Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Special Committee of the Whole - 13 Oct 2025 - Agenda - Pdf
CITY OF RENTON AGENDA - Special Committee of the Whole Meeting 4:45 PM - Monday, October 13, 2025 7th Floor Council Chambers 1. MID-BIENNIAL BUDGET ADJUSTMENT a) Presentation b) 2025 Mid-Biennial Issue Paper c) 2025-2026 Mid-Biennial Budget Amendment Detail d) 2025-2026 Vehicle Acquisitions & Replacements 2. LEGISLATION a) DRAFT 2025 Mid-Biennial Budget and Salary Table Amendment Ordinance b) DRAFT 2026 Property Tax Levy Ordinance c) DRAFT 2026 Property Tax Increase Ordinance d) DRAFT 2025-2026 Fee Schedule Resolution If you would like to attend this week's meeting remotely, you can do so by going to https://us02web.zoom.us/j/86753290028?pwd=M2pOc09HWWNrY05uVnlIWnpGS1E4UT09 Zoom Meeting ID: 867 5329 0028, Passcode: 881839 You can call through Zoom at (253) 215-8782 and use the Meeting ID. 2025 –2026 MID-BIENNIAL BUDGET COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE OCTOBER 13, 2025 AG E N D A I T E M # 1 . a ) BUDGET-RELATED LEGISLATION •Property Tax Levy Ordinance •2025-2026 Budget Ordinance •Various User Fee Adjustments (Fee Schedule and Resolution) AG E N D A I T E M # 1 . a ) REMAINING BUDGET ACTIVITIES Committee of the Whole –6 pm •Mid-Biennial Update 13 Oct. Regular Council Meeting –7 pm •1st Public hearing 13 Oct. Regular Council Meeting –7 pm •2nd Public hearing 20 Oct. Finance Committee •Discuss proposed budget-related legislation •Finalize committee report 27 Oct. Regular Council Meeting –7 pm •Adopt committee report •1st reading of 2025-2026 budget ordinance •1st reading 2026 property tax levy ordinance •2025-2026 user fee ordinance 27 Oct. Regular Council Meeting –7 pm •2nd reading & enactment all budget-related legislation •Adopt fee schedule resolution 3 Nov. AG E N D A I T E M # 1 . a ) PROPERTY TAX LEVY King County Assessed Value (AV)29,143,362,451$ 29,920,283,640$ 2025 2026 Prior Year Levy 25,783,496 26,293,862 Limit factor (lessor of 1% or IPD)257,835 262,939 Banked Capacity Levied - - Prior Year Refunds 65,423 - New Construction 187,108 14,709 Total Property Tax Levied 26,293,862$ 26,571,510$ Base Levy Rate/$1,000 AV 0.902 0.888 Estimated Levy Amount 26,285,139$ 26,571,510$ Estimated Levy Rate/$1,000 AV 0.902 0.888 2025 2026 Median Residential AV 706,000$ 722,500$ Estimated Annual Tax 637$ 642$ Average Annual Tax Bill Increase to Household:5$ AG E N D A I T E M # 1 . a ) GENERAL FUND: Proposed Revenue Adjustments Revenue (in millions) 2025 2026 Total Taxes: B&O Tax 4.0$ 3.0$ 7.0$ Utility Tax 2.0 2.0 4.0 HB2015 Public Safety Sales Tax - 3.5 3.5 Sales Tax 1.0 1.0 2.0 Gambling Tax 0.5 - 0.5 Property Tax - (0.5) (0.5) Interest Earnings 3.0 1.0 4.0 Permit Fees 0.5 - 0.5 Grants 0.4 - 0.4 Fines & Penalties (0.8) (0.8) (1.5) Leases (0.05) (0.1) (0.2) Charges for Services - (0.2) (0.2) Total Revenue Adjustment 10.6$ 8.9$ 19.5$ AG E N D A I T E M # 1 . a ) Business Taxes Business and Occupation (B&O) tax increase of $4M and $3M for 2025 and 2026 respectively. Sales tax trending 1.3% less than prior year and 7% over budget AG E N D A I T E M # 1 . a ) UTILITY TAXES Collections anticipated to increase approximately 5% in 2025 over prior year $2M increase to budget in both 2025 and 2026 AG E N D A I T E M # 1 . a ) INTEREST EARNINGS Investment yield rates are decreasing to align with federal funds rates $3M and $1M added to 2025 and 2026 budget, respectively AG E N D A I T E M # 1 . a ) OTHER REVENUES Increases Gambling tax $500K in 2025 Permit fees $500K in 2025 Grants $400K in 2025 Public safety sales tax $3.5M in 2026 Decreases Fines & penalties $750K both years Charges for services $200K in 2026 Leases $50K in 2025 and $140K in 2026 AG E N D A I T E M # 1 . a ) GENERAL FUND: Proposed Expenditure Adjustments Expenditures (in millions)2025 2026 Total Community Center Land Acquisition 13.0$ -$ 13.0$ House Bill 2015 Public Safety - 3.2 3.2 Staffing Changes - 1.9 1.9 Stabilization Policy Reserves 1.5 1.5 3.0 Animal Control Contracted Services 0.5 - 0.5 Grants 0.4 - 0.4 Other (0.08) 0.4 0.3 Electronic Home Detention Program - (0.2) (0.2) Total Expenditure Adjustment 15.3$ 6.8$ 22.1$ AG E N D A I T E M # 1 . a ) STAFFING - PROPOSED CHANGE in FTEs Dept FTE Proposed*2025 2026 Funding Source Community Econ Dev 1 Add one Code Compliance Manager at M32 in 2025 203.7$ General Fund Community Econ Dev 1 Add one Assistant Bulding Official at M35 in 2025 210.5 General Fund Community Econ Dev 1 Add one Engineering Specialist at A14 in 2025 105.0 General Fund Community Econ Dev (1) Remove one Administrative Secretary at A10 in 2025 (95.0) General Fund Police (2) Remove two Electronic Home Detention Coordinator positons at pn61 in 2026 (379.4) General Fund Parks & Rec 1 Add one Human Services Director at M38 in 2025 190.0 General Fund Parks & Rec (1) Remove one Human Servicse Manager at N22 in 2026 (165.0) General Fund Parks & Rec 1 Add one Recreation Supervisor at N16 in 2026 135.0 General Fund Parks & Rec (1) Remove one Museum Manager at N19 in 2026 (145.0) General Fund City Attorney 1 Add one Prosecuting Attorney at N22 in 2026 185.9 House Bill 2015 City Attorney 1 Add one Paralegal at A17 in 2026 143.6 House Bill 2015 Proposed Change to FTEs:2 Total Fiscal Impact:389.4$ *Positions requested in 2025 will be absorbed with salary savings AG E N D A I T E M # 1 . a ) NON-REPRESENTED SALARY STUDY Align with market comparable Manage compression New and expanded pay scales AG E N D A I T E M # 1 . a ) LONG RANGE FORECAST 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Summary ($ in Millions)Actual Actual Adjusted Adjusted Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Beginning Fund Balance 83.6$ 99.2$ 116.0$ 98.4$ 94.4$ 89.7$ 83.3$ 74.9$ 64.7$ Operating Revenue 145.2$ 156.3$ 147.9$ 150.0$ 152.3$ 155.4$ 158.6$ 161.9$ 165.3$ Base Operating Expenditure (132.1) (139.5) (143.4) (149.8) (155.3) (160.1) (165.3) (170.4) (175.6) Operating Surplus (Deficit)13.1$ 16.7$ 4.4$ 0.3$ (3.0)$ (4.7)$ (6.7)$ (8.5)$ (10.3)$ 1X Sources 3.1$ 3.4$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1X Uses (0.6) - (25.4) (4.3) (1.7) (1.7) (1.7) (1.7) (1.7) Net Resources - (Uses)15.6$ 16.7$ (17.6)$ (4.0)$ (4.7)$ (6.4)$ (8.4)$ (10.2)$ (12.0)$ Ending Fund Balance 99.2$ 116.0$ 98.4$ 94.4$ 89.7$ 83.3$ 74.9$ 64.7$ 52.6$ AG E N D A I T E M # 1 . a ) OTHER FUND ADJUSTMENTS Capital: •Park Land Acquisition •Legacy Square Phase 2 •Oaksdale Ave SW Construction •SW 43rd Street Improvements •Sound Transit Hawk Signal •Rainier Ave/Oaksdale Surface Water Pump Station •Taxiway Alpha Rehabilitation Project Remove Special Capital Fund Garbage Disposal Fees – 2025 & 2026 Fleet Fuel Costs and Repairs AG E N D A I T E M # 1 . a ) FEE SCHEDULE CHANGES UPDATED SCHOOL IMPACT FEES UPDATED FIRE IMPACT FEES GOLF COURSE GREEN FEES AG E N D A I T E M # 1 . a ) MID-BIENNIAL BUDGET ADJUSTMENT: ACTIONS REQUIRED Set Property Tax Levy for 2026 01 Adopt Budget Legislation 02 Update Fee Schedule 03 AG E N D A I T E M # 1 . a ) QUESTIONS AG E N D A I T E M # 1 . a ) DATE: October 13, 2025 TO: James Alberson, Jr., Council President Members of Renton City Council VIA: Armondo Pavone, Mayor FROM: Kari Roller, Administrator STAFF CONTACT: Kristin Trivelas, Fiscal Services Director SUBJECT: 2025-2026 Mid-Biennium Budget Amendment Ordinance, Fee Schedule Resolution, and Property Tax Ordinances RECOMMENDATION Adopt the ordinances amending the 2025-2026 Biennial Budget, 2025-2026 Salary Tables, and set the 2026 property tax rate and resolutions amending the 2025-2026 Fee Schedule. OVERVIEW The primary purpose of the proposed 2025-2026 mid-biennium budget amendment is to adjust the projected revenues midway through the biennium and set the property tax rate for the upcoming year. This budget adjustment will also incorporate additional budget for new grants awarded and associated expenditures during the period; adjustments for unanticipated expenditures; and any adjustments to various capital projects as needed. The proposed revenue budget adjustment totals $64.4M and the proposed expenditure budget adjustment totals $76.5M for the biennium. FISCAL IMPACT I. PROPOSED GENERAL GOVERNMENTAL ADJUSTMENTS: The proposed budget amendment increases budgeted general fund revenues by $19.5M largely made up of adjustments to projected taxes. The budget adjustment also includes an increase of general fund expenditures of $22.1M which includes $13M transfer to the capital fund for the purchase of parks property and an additional $3M transfer over the biennium for stabilization fund reserves. The proposed expenditure adjustments are described in the attached 2025-2026 Mid-Biennial Budget Amendment Detail document. The adjustments will leave $95.2M in General Fund balance. AGENDA ITEM #1. b) James Alberson, Jr., Council President Members of Renton City Council Page 2 of 3 October 13, 2025 II. OTHER FUNDS: The proposed budget amendment includes an increase of $44.9M in revenue for newly awarded grants, transfers and rate adjustments and an increase of $54.4M in proposed expenditure adjustments that are described in the attached 2025-2026 Mid-Biennial Budget Amendment Detail document. The adjustments will leave $197.1M in all other city funds combined fund balance. III. CLOSEOUT OF FUND: The proposed budget amendment includes the closeout of Fund 346, New Family First Center Development Fund. This fund was created in 2017 to account for revenues and expenditures used to construct a new Family First Community Center. The project was completed in 2024, and the remaining funds will be transferred to the Municipal Facilities Capital Investment Program, to support the purchase of the parks land acquisition, necessitating the formal closure of this fund. IV. CHANGES TO AUTHORIZED POSITIONS: The proposed budget amendment will add 7.0 FTE and remove 5.0 FTE to the currently adopted 2025-2026 positions. Below is a summary of the changes. 1. Community and Economic Department: a. Add 1.0 FTE Code Compliance Manager (M32) in 2025 b. Add 1.0 FTE Assistant Building Official (M34) in 2025 c. Remove 1.0 FTE Administrative Secretary 1 (A10) in 2025 d. Add 1.0 FTE Engineering Specialist 1 (A14) in 2025 2. Parks and Recreation Department: a. Add 1.0 FTE Human Services Director (M41) in 2025 b. Remove 1.0 FTE Human Services Manager (NR22) in 2026 c. Add 1.0 FTE Recreation Supervisor (NR16) in 2026 d. Remove 1.0 FTE Museum Manager (NR19) in 2026 3. Police Department: a. Remove 2.0 FTE Electronic Home Detention Coordinator positions (pn61) in 2026 4. City Attorney Office: a. Add 1.0 FTE Prosecuting Attorney (NR22) in 2026 b. Add 1.0 FTE Paralegal (A18) in 2026 V. 2025-2026 FEE SCHEDULE AMENDMENT: The proposed fee schedule amendments include changes to the Maplewood Golf Course Fees, remove school impact fees as established in the Kent, Issaquah, and Renton School District’s Capital Facilities Plans, and adjust the fire impact fees as established in the Renton Regional Fire Authority’s Capital Facilities Plan. Below are the sections of the fee schedule with proposed changes. Additional details can be found in the attached 2025-2026 Fee Schedule (redlined version). AGENDA ITEM #1. b) James Alberson, Jr., Council President Members of Renton City Council Page 3 of 3 October 13, 2025 1. Section II. Maplewood Golf Course 2. Section XII. Development Fees 3. Section XIII. Fire Department Fire Marshal Fees (RFA) VI. SALARY TABLE AMENDMENT: A comprehensive salary study was conducted for the non-represented employee group. The new 2026 non-represented salary table reflects market adjustments that align with similar positions from comparable agencies and an expanded pay scale moving from five steps to eight steps within each grade category. Along with the changes noted above in FTE positions, the proposed salary schedules also reflect the following changes to title only and will not add additional positions. 1. Change Vehicle and Equipment Mechanic to Vehicle and Equipment Mechanic 2 (A16) and create a position series to include Vehicle Equipment Mechanic 1 position (A12) in 2025 2. Change Senior Human Resources Analyst – DEI to Senior Human Resources Analyst – Workforce and Equity in 2025 3. Change Assistant Airport Manager to Airport Operations Manager in 2025 4. Convert Economic Development Assistant Director (M36) to Business Recruitment and Retention Manager (M36) in 2025 5. Change Deputy City Clerk/Public Records Officer to Deputy City Clerk/Public Disclosure Manager in 2026 The budget adjustment proposes to adjust the 2025 and 2026 salary schedules to reflect the proposed position changes, changes in wages for both cost of living adjustments as well as market rate adjustments, and various title changes. The new salary tables can be found in the attached Budget Amendment Ordinance, Exhibit C and D. VII. PROPERTY TAX INCREASE AND LEVY: The proposed adoption of the Property Tax Increase Ordinance and Property Tax Levy Ordinance to increase property tax for the year 2026. CONCLUSION The mid-biennial budget amendment will amend the 2025-2026 Biennial Budget by $64.4M in revenues and $76.5M in expenditures; set the 2026 property tax rate; amend the 2025- 2026 Salary Tables; and amend the 2025-2026 Fee Schedule. Staff recommends Council approve the proposed adjustments. Attachments: Budget Amendment Ordinance, Exhibit A, Exhibit B, Exhibit C, and Exhibit D 2025-2026 Mid-Biennial Budget Amendment Detail 2025-2026 Vehicle Acquisitions & Replacements 2025-2026 Fee Schedule and Amendment Resolution 2026 Property Tax Increase Ordinance and 2026 Property Tax Levy Ordinance AGENDA ITEM #1. b) FUND Description Adopted 2025 Adjustment 2026 Adjustment Amended CF or NEW Prior Council Approval? GENERAL FUND (Fund 0XX) Beginning Fund Balance 115,968,224 - - 115,968,224 REVENUES CED Port of Seattle Grant - Economic Development Partnership 60,000 CF Y CED Port of Seattle Grant - Economic Development Partnership 120,000 NEW Y CED Washington Department of Commerce Grant - Transit-Oriented Development Implementation 54,000 CF Y CW House Bill 2015 - Public Safety Funding 3,500,000 NEW N CW B&O Tax Revenue Adjustment 4,000,000 3,000,000 NEW N CW Building Permit Revenue Adjustment 500,000 NEW N CW City Utility Tax Revenue Adjustment 500,000 500,000 NEW N CW Gambling Tax Revenue Adjustment 500,000 NEW N CW Interest Income Adjustment 3,000,000 1,000,000 NEW N CW Photo Enforcement Revenue Adjustment (750,000) (750,000)NEW N CW Sales Tax Revenue Adjustment 1,000,000 1,000,000 NEW N CW Electric Utility Tax Revenue Adjustment 1,500,000 1,500,000 NEW N CW Property Tax Revenue Adjustment (500,000)NEW N ESD Simple Possession Advocacy and Representation Grant 8,800 NEW Y MC 2024 Therapeutic Grant Duplicate Funds Correction (8,000)CF Y MC Administrative Office of Courts - Blake Grant 5,000 NEW Y MC Administrative Office of Courts and Renton Municipal Court - Community Court Program 228,283 NEW Y MC Blake Grant Expiration (285,984)NEW Y P&R Rotary Club of Renton Grant 3,500 NEW N P&R United Way of King County Grant - Summer Lunch Program 8,000 NEW N PD Internet Crimes Against Children 6,362 CF Y PD Registered Sex Offender Verification Grant 19,599 NEW Y PD Remove EHD Program (200,000)NEW N PD Washington Criminal Justice Training Commission - Officer Wellness Grant 24,342 NEW Y PW Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant 157,700 NEW Y PW Amazing Grace Lutheran Church Lease - 200 Mill Ave (60,000) (140,000)NEW Y PW Cleveland Property Lease 10,000 NEW N PW Washington Department of Transportation Grant - Commute Trip Reduction 16,732 CF Y Total Revenue Adjustment 281,772,227 10,618,334 8,910,000 301,300,561 EXPENDITURES CA Process Costs for Increased Number of Trials 15,800 NEW N CA New Paralegal 143,647 NEW N CA New Prosecuting Attorney 185,897 NEW N CA ISF Charges for 2 New FTE Positions - Facilities 20,000 NEW N CA ISF Charges for 2 New FTE Positions - IT 8,000 NEW N CED Engineering Specialist 10,000 NEW N CED Graffiti Abatement Program 40,000 50,000 NEW N CED New Assistant Building Official 210,523 NEW N CED New Code Compliance Manager 203,713 NEW N CED Port of Seattle Grant - Economic Development Partnership 180,000 NEW Y CED Washington State Department of Commerce Grant - Middle Housing 6,544 CF Y CW AFSCME Collective Bargaining Agreement (157,089) 78,543 NEW Y CW House Bill 2015 - Public Safety Funding 3,170,455 NEW N ESD 2026 Pilot Print Publications 69,000 NEW N ESD Graphic Design 10,500 NEW N ESD Graphic Design - Let's Go Renton! 13,000 NEW N ESD New Salaries and Wages for Fellowship Program 26,250 NEW Y ESD Nishiwaki Sister City Delegation Visit 15,000 NEW N ESD Paper Supplies 15,000 NEW N ESD Simple Possession Advocacy and Representation Grant 8,800 NEW Y ESD Translation Services 5,000 NEW N FIN Non-Represented Salary Study 1,465,000 NEW N FIN Finance Position Changes from Q2 213,624 NEW Y FIN Utility Tax Rebates 30,000 NEW N HRRM Stabilization Policy Reserves 1,500,000 1,500,000 NEW N MC Administrative Office of Courts - Blake Grant 5,000 NEW Y MC Administrative Office of Courts and Renton Municipal Court - Community Court Program 228,283 NEW Y MC Blake Grant Expiration (285,984)NEW Y MC Interpreter Services 30,000 NEW N MC Therapeutic Court Supplies 5,000 NEW N P&R Transfer B&O Tax for Community Center Acquisition 13,000,000 NEW Y P&R Human Services Director 25,000 NEW N P&R Rotary Club of Renton Grant 3,500 NEW N P&R United Way of King County Grant - Summer Lunch Program 8,000 NEW N P&R Recreation Supervisor at Museum (10,000)NEW N P&R Urban Tree Canopy Project Grant 13,302 CF Y PD Animal Control Veterinary Services 500,000 NEW N PD Registered Sex Offender Verification Grant 19,599 NEW Y PD Remove Electronic Home Detention Program (208,147)NEW N PD Remove (2) Electronic Home Detention Coordinators (379,420)NEW N PD Washington Criminal Justice Training Commission - Officer Wellness Grant 24,342 NEW Y PW Project Development & Predesign Program - Planning (50,000)NEW N PW Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant 157,700 NEW Y PW Cleveland Property Lease 1,200 NEW N Total Expenditure Adjustment 299,928,652 15,337,496 6,787,087 322,053,235 Ending Fund Balance 97,811,799 (4,719,161) 2,122,913 95,215,550 2025 3rd Quarter Budget Amendment Detail Page 1 of 6 AGENDA ITEM #1. c) FUND Description Adopted 2025 Adjustment 2026 Adjustment Amended CF or NEW Prior Council Approval? CABLE COMMUNICATIONS DEVELOPMENT (Fund 127) Beginning Fund Balance 372,210 - - 372,210 REVENUES Total Revenue Adjustment 120,000 - - 120,000 EXPENDITURES ESD Attorney Fees for Renegotiation of the Comcast Franchise Fee 25,000 NEW N Total Expenditure Adjustment 195,348 25,000 - 220,348 Ending Fund Balance 296,862 (25,000) - 271,862 FUND Description Adopted 2025 Adjustment 2026 Adjustment Amended CF or NEW Prior Council Approval? HOUSING AND SUPPORTIVE SERVICES (FUND 130) Beginning Fund Balance 15,430,639 - - 15,430,639 REVENUES Total Revenue Adjustment 8,060,000 - - 8,060,000 EXPENDITURES PD Project Be Free Alternative Response Services 92,500 185,000 NEW Y Total Expenditure Adjustment 8,345,719 92,500 185,000 8,623,219 Ending Fund Balance 15,144,920 (92,500) (185,000)14,867,420 FUND Description Adopted 2025 Adjustment 2026 Adjustment Amended CF or NEW Prior Council Approval? REET 1 (Fund 308) Beginning Fund Balance 5,060,894 - - 5,060,894 REVENUES Total Revenue Adjustment 5,040,000 - - 5,040,000 EXPENDITURES P&R Transfer out REET 1 for Community Center Acquisition 2,000,000 NEW Y P&R Cleveland Richardson Park (200,000)NEW Y Total Expenditure Adjustment 5,460,000 2,000,000 (200,000)7,260,000 Ending Fund Balance 4,640,894 (2,000,000) 200,000 2,840,894 FUND Description Adopted 2025 Adjustment 2026 Adjustment Amended CF or NEW Prior Council Approval? SCHOOL IMPACT MITIGATION (FUND 31X) Beginning Fund Balance 2,368 - - 2,368 REVENUES CW Renton School District Impact Fee Adjustment (495,000)NEW N CW Issaquah School District Impact Fee Adjustment (95,000)NEW N Total Revenue Adjustment 1,200,000 - (590,000)610,000 EXPENDITURES CW Renton School District Impact Fee Adjustment (495,000)NEW N CW Issaquah School District Impact Fee Adjustment (95,000)NEW N Total Expenditure Adjustment 1,200,000 - (590,000)610,000 Ending Fund Balance 2,368 - - 2,368 Page 2 of 6 AGENDA ITEM #1. c) FUND Description Adopted 2025 Adjustment 2026 Adjustment Amended CF or NEW Prior Council Approval? MUNICIPAL FACILITIES CIP (Fund 316) Beginning Fund Balance 28,180,515 - - 28,180,515 REVENUES CED Washington Department of Commerce Grant - Legacy Square 1,498,650 NEW N P&R Cedar River Trail Flood Repair (200,952)NEW Y P&R Closeout Fund 346 and Transfer for Community Center Acquisition 4,020,187 NEW N P&R Sam Chastain Trail 485,000 NEW N P&R Transfer in B&O Tax for Community Center Acquisition 13,000,000 NEW Y P&R Transfer in REET 1 for Community Center Acquisition 2,000,000 NEW Y P&R Cleveland Richardson Park (200,000)NEW Y PW Puget Sound Energy Conservation Grant 222,228 NEW Y PW Washington Department of Commerce Grant - Energy Retrofits for Public Buildings (94,115)CF Y Total Revenue Adjustment 23,112,336 20,930,998 (200,000)43,843,334 EXPENDITURES CED Legacy Square - Phase 2 301,350 NEW N CED Washington Department of Commerce Grant - Legacy Square 1,498,650 NEW N CED Compton Lumber Acquisition 54,000 NEW Y P&R Cedar River Trail Flood Repairs 130,000 NEW N P&R Cleveland Richardson Park 200,000 (200,000)NEW N P&R Community Center Land Acquisition 21,000,000 NEW Y P&R May Creek Flood Repairs 400,000 NEW N P&R Sam Chastain Trail 485,000 NEW N P&R Park Ave Maintenance Facility 60,000 NEW N PW Washington Department of Commerce Grant - Energy Retrofits for Public Buildings (94,115)CF Y Total Expenditure Adjustment 45,151,490 24,034,885 (200,000)68,986,375 Ending Fund Balance 6,141,362 (3,103,887) - 3,037,475 FUND Description Adopted 2025 Adjustment 2026 Adjustment Amended CF or NEW Prior Council Approval? CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT (Fund 317) Beginning Fund Balance 14,132,444 - - 14,132,444 REVENUES PW Oakesdale Ave SW Grant 1,737,015 NEW Y PW Project Development & Predesign Program - Planning (50,000)NEW N PW Sound Transit Grant - Hawk Signal Project 790,000 NEW Y PW S 2nd St Conversion Grant Deobligation (1,328,562)NEW Y PW S 7th St Project TIB Grant 42,495 NEW Y Total Revenue Adjustment 38,804,715 1,190,948 - 39,995,663 EXPENDITURES PW Arterial Circulation - Project Development and Redesign Program 148,275 NEW N PW Arterial Circulation Rehab Construction - SW 43rd 750,000 NEW N PW Oakesdale Ave SW Construction 1,737,015 NEW Y PW Sound Transit Grant - Hawk Signal Project 790,000 NEW Y PW Project Development & Predesign Program - Planning (163,748)NEW N PW S 2nd St Conversion Grant Deobligation (1,328,562)NEW Y PW S 7th St Project TIB Grant 42,495 NEW Y Total Expenditure Adjustment 48,256,146 1,975,474 - 50,231,621 Ending Fund Balance 4,681,013 (784,527) - 3,896,486 FUND Description Adopted 2025 Adjustment 2026 Adjustment Amended CF or NEW Prior Council Approval? FAMILY FIRST CENTER DEVELOPMENT (Fund 346) Beginning Fund Balance 3,937,547 - - 3,937,547 REVENUES P&R Fund 346 Investment Interest Rebalance 82,641 NEW N Total Revenue Adjustment - 82,641 - 82,641 EXPENDITURES P&R Closeout Fund 346 and Transfer for Community Center Acquisition 4,020,187 NEW N Total Expenditure Adjustment - 4,020,187 - 4,020,187 Ending Fund Balance 3,937,547 (3,937,547) - - FUND Description Adopted 2025 Adjustment 2026 Adjustment Amended CF or NEW Prior Council Approval? AIRPORT OPERATIONS AND CIP (Fund 4X2) Beginning Fund Balance 13,353,300 - - 13,353,300 REVENUES PW Federal Aviation Administration Grant - Airport Improvement for Air Traffic Control Tower Siting Study 470,184 NEW Y PW Taxiway A Rehabilitation Project 17,438,914 NEW Y Total Revenue Adjustment 10,054,521 17,909,098 - 27,963,618 EXPENDITURES CW AFSCME Collective Bargaining Agreement 16,554 16,554 NEW Y PW Non-Represented Salary Study 5,000 NEW N PW Federal Aviation Administration Grant - Airport Improvement for Air Traffic Control Tower Siting Study 470,184 NEW Y PW Taxiway A Rehabilitation Project 17,438,914 NEW Y Total Expenditure Adjustment 19,791,007 17,925,652 21,554 37,738,213 Ending Fund Balance 3,616,814 (16,554) (21,554)3,578,706 Page 3 of 6 AGENDA ITEM #1. c) FUND Description Adopted 2025 Adjustment 2026 Adjustment Amended CF or NEW Prior Council Approval? SOLID WASTE UTILITY (Fund 403) Beginning Fund Balance 3,972,834 - - 3,972,834 REVENUES PW Local Solid Waste Financial Assistance Grant 131,694 NEW N PW Revenue from Solid Waste Customers 1,000,000 1,000,000 NEW Y Total Revenue Adjustment 54,502,934 1,131,694 1,000,000 56,634,628 EXPENDITURES CW AFSCME Collective Bargaining Agreement 2,084 2,084 NEW Y PW Garbage Disposal Fees - Per Ton 1,000,000 1,000,000 NEW N PW Local Solid Waste Financial Assistance Grant 131,694 NEW N PW Non-Represented Salary Study 5,000 NEW N Total Expenditure Adjustment 55,949,978 1,133,778 1,007,084 58,090,840 Ending Fund Balance 2,525,789 (2,084) (7,084)2,516,622 FUND Description Adopted 2025 Adjustment 2026 Adjustment Amended CF or NEW Prior Council Approval? GOLF COURSE SYSTEM & CAPITAL (Fund 4X4) Beginning Fund Balance 2,611,728 - - 2,611,728 REVENUES Total Revenue Adjustment 9,453,764 - - 9,453,764 EXPENDITURES CW AFSCME Collective Bargaining Agreement 1,998 1,998 NEW Y P&R Non-Represented Salary Study 15,000 NEW N Total Expenditure Adjustment 10,114,982 1,998 16,998 10,133,978 Ending Fund Balance 1,950,509 (1,998) (16,998)1,931,513 FUND Description Adopted 2025 Adjustment 2026 Adjustment Amended CF or NEW Prior Council Approval? WATER OPERATIONS & CAPITAL (Fund 4X5) Beginning Fund Balance 56,673,939 - - 56,673,939 REVENUES PW Highlands Water Main Improvements Project 30,751 NEW N Total Revenue Adjustment 39,791,275 30,751 - 39,822,025 EXPENDITURES CW AFSCME Collective Bargaining Agreement 23,397 23,397 NEW Y PW Non-Represented Salary Study 15,000 NEW N PW Highlands Water Main Improvements Project 30,751 NEW N Total Expenditure Adjustment 70,627,629 54,148 38,397 70,720,174 Ending Fund Balance 25,837,584 (23,397) (38,397)25,775,790 FUND Description Adopted 2025 Adjustment 2026 Adjustment Amended CF or NEW Prior Council Approval? WASTEWATER OPERATIONS & CAPITAL (Fund 4X6) Beginning Fund Balance 27,706,296 - - 27,706,296 REVENUES Total Revenue Adjustment 25,807,752 - - 25,807,752 EXPENDITURES CW AFSCME Collective Bargaining Agreement 9,815 9,815 NEW Y PW Non-Represented Salary Study 15,000 NEW N Total Expenditure Adjustment 40,143,001 9,815 24,815 40,177,631 Ending Fund Balance 13,371,046 (9,815) (24,815)13,336,417 Page 4 of 6 AGENDA ITEM #1. c) FUND Description Adopted 2025 Adjustment 2026 Adjustment Amended CF or NEW Prior Council Approval? SURFACE WATER OPERATIONS & CAPITAL (Fund 4X7) Beginning Fund Balance 25,766,980 - - 25,766,980 REVENUES PW King County Flood Control District Grant - Lind Ave SW Storm System Project (225,000)NEW Y PW Monroe Ave NE Project Closeout (1,901,063)NEW Y Total Revenue Adjustment 47,219,583 (2,126,063) - 45,093,520 EXPENDITURES CW AFSCME Collective Bargaining Agreement 10,955 10,955 NEW Y PW Non-Represented Salary Study 15,000 NEW N PW Burnett Ave S/Williams Ave S Project Completion (850,000)NEW N PW King County Flood Control District Grant - Lind Ave SW Storm System Project (225,000)NEW Y PW Monroe Ave NE Project Closeout (1,751,063)NEW N PW Rainier Ave/Oaksdale Ave Pump Station 1,661,614 NEW N PW Rolling Hills Creek Project (611,614)NEW N PW Windsor Hills Storm System Improvements (200,000)NEW N Total Expenditure Adjustment 54,737,583 (1,965,108) 25,955 52,798,431 Ending Fund Balance 18,248,980 (160,955) (25,955)18,062,069 FUND Description Adopted 2025 Adjustment 2026 Adjustment Amended CF or NEW Prior Council Approval? KING COUNTY METRO (Fund 416) Beginning Fund Balance 7,647,811 - - 7,647,811 REVENUES PW Additional King County Metro Revenue 500,000 1,200,000 NEW Y Total Revenue Adjustment 46,582,924 500,000 1,200,000 48,282,924 EXPENDITURES PW Additional King County Metro Expenditures 500,000 1,200,000 NEW Y Total Expenditure Adjustment 46,582,924 500,000 1,200,000 48,282,924 Ending Fund Balance 7,647,811 - - 7,647,811 FUND Description Adopted 2025 Adjustment 2026 Adjustment Amended CF or NEW Prior Council Approval? EQUIPMENT RENTAL (Fund 501) Beginning Fund Balance 19,535,828 - - 19,535,828 REVENUES Total Revenue Adjustment 13,934,743 - - 13,934,743 EXPENDITURES PW 2024 Vehicle Upfits 231,160 CF Y PW Office and Operating Supplies 200,000 NEW N PW Repairs and Maintenance 400,000 400,000 NEW N PW Street Maintenance Snow Plow (39,000)NEW Y Total Expenditure Adjustment 18,893,521 792,160 400,000 20,085,681 Ending Fund Balance 14,577,051 (792,160) (400,000)13,384,891 FUND Description Adopted 2025 Adjustment 2026 Adjustment Amended CF or NEW Prior Council Approval? INSURANCE (Fund 502) Beginning Fund Balance 25,781,346 - - 25,781,346 REVENUES HRRM Stabilization Policy Reserves 1,500,000 1,500,000 NEW N HRRM Safety National Insurance Recovery 900,000 NEW N Total Revenue Adjustment 14,094,435 2,400,000 1,500,000 17,994,435 EXPENDITURES HRRM Origami Duplicate Funds Transfer (52,868) (52,868)NEW N HRRM Settlement Claims Increase 1,500,000 NEW Y Total Expenditure Adjustment 16,442,102 1,447,132 (52,868)17,836,367 Ending Fund Balance 23,433,679 952,868 1,552,868 25,939,414 FUND Description Adopted 2025 Adjustment 2026 Adjustment Amended CF or NEW Prior Council Approval? INFORMATION SERVICES (Fund 503) Beginning Fund Balance 9,632,207 - - 9,632,207 REVENUES CA ISF Charges for 2 New FTE Positions - IT 8,000 NEW N HRRM Origami Duplicate Funds Transfer (52,868) (52,868)NEW N Total Revenue Adjustment 20,178,674 (52,868) (44,868)20,080,939 EXPENDITURES CA ISF Charges for 2 New FTE Positions - IT 8,000 NEW N CW AFSCME Collective Bargaining Agreement 52,450 52,450 NEW Y ESD IT Software Applications and Network Systems 200,000 NEW N ESD Non-Represented Salary Study 60,000 NEW N HRRM Origami Duplicate Funds Transfer (52,868) (52,868)NEW N Total Expenditure Adjustment 24,357,560 199,582 67,582 24,624,724 Ending Fund Balance 5,453,322 (252,450) (112,450)5,088,422 Page 5 of 6 AGENDA ITEM #1. c) FUND Description Adopted 2025 Adjustment 2026 Adjustment Amended CF or NEW Prior Council Approval? FACILITIES (Fund 504) Beginning Fund Balance 1,962,169 - - 1,962,169 REVENUES CA ISF Charges for 2 New FTE Positions - Facilities 20,000 NEW N Total Revenue Adjustment 15,714,846 - 20,000 15,734,846 EXPENDITURES CA ISF Charges for 2 New FTE Positions - Facilities 20,000 NEW N CW AFSCME Collective Bargaining Agreement 39,837 39,837 NEW Y PW Non-Represented Salary Study 5,000 NEW N Total Expenditure Adjustment 16,229,320 39,837 64,837 16,333,993 Ending Fund Balance 1,447,695 (39,837) (44,837)1,363,022 FUND Description Adopted 2025 Adjustment 2026 Adjustment Amended CF or NEW Prior Council Approval? FIREMENS PENSION (Fund 611) Beginning Fund Balance 9,636,752 - - 9,636,752 REVENUES Total Revenue Adjustment 1,800,000 - - 1,800,000 EXPENDITURES FIN Fire Pension Fund 50,000 50,000 NEW N Total Expenditure Adjustment 540,450 50,000 50,000 640,450 Ending Fund Balance 10,896,302 (50,000) (50,000)10,796,302 Page 6 of 6 AGENDA ITEM #1. c) Dept Assigned Charge Code Equipment Number Make Model Class Description Original Cost Year Purchased Life 2025 Adjusted Budget 2026 Adjusted Budget FACILITIES POOL32 C204 CHEV SONOMA 2000 CHEVROLET EXT CAB PU 16,760 2001 10 50,000 FACILITIES POOL32 C211 GMCX SONOMA 2000 SONOMA EXT CAB 15,212 2002 10 50,000 FACILITIES POOL32 C219 CHEV VAN 2330 VAN 3500 W/CABINETS 19,221 2002 10 50,000 FACILITIES POOL32 C223 FORD RANGER 2000 2003 FORD RANGER 16,762 2003 10 45,500 PARK POOL31 P082 WOOD NONE 5050 WOODS ROTARY MOWER 6,120 1995 10 26,000 PARK POOL31 P091 JNDR 5300 3900 5300 2WD TRACTOR 14,183 1997 10 45,500 PARK POOL31 P100 JNDR 5310 3900 JOHN DEERE 2 WHL DR TRACTOR 18,305 1998 10 52,000 PARK POOL31 P109 TORO 7200 5600 TORO WORKMAN SPRAYER 20,526 1999 10 52,000 PARK POOL31 P128 JNDR 4250M 5000 JOHN DEERE WALK BEHIND MOWER 5,075 2004 10 26,000 PARK ADMIN POOL30 C214 GMCX SONOMA 2000 GMC SONOMA 14,348 2002 10 45,500 POLICE POOL03 C242A CHEV SILVERADO 2034 2008 CHEVROLET SILVERADO PU 26,351 2008 10 58,500 POLICE POOL02 B163 FORD ESCAPE 2010 2011 FORD ESCAPE 4X4 22,079 2011 8 85,000 POLICE POOL08 B172 CHEV TAHOE 2020 CHEVROLET TAHOE 30,186 2013 8 85,000 POLICE POOL08 B174 CHEV TAHOE 2020 CHEVROLET TAHOE 30,213 2013 8 85,000 POLICE POOL08 B175 CHEV TAHOE 2020 CHEVROLET TAHOE 20,214 2013 8 85,000 POLICE POOL09 B176 CHEV TAHOE 2020 CHEVROLET TAHOE K9 30,214 2013 8 100,000 POLICE POOL08 B177 CHEV TAHOE 2020 CHEVROLET TAHOE 30,186 2013 8 85,000 POLICE POOL10 B178 CHEV TAHOE 2020 CHEVROLET TAHOE 34,040 2013 8 85,000 POLICE POOL08 B179 CHEV TAHOE 2020 CHEVROLET TAHOE 30,186 2013 8 85,000 POLICE POOL08 B180 CHEV TAHOE 2020 CHEVROLET TAHOE 30,186 2013 8 85,000 POLICE POOL10 B181 CHEV TAHOE 2020 CHEVROLET TAHOE 30,186 2013 8 85,000 POLICE POOL08 B222 CHEV TAHOE 2020 CHEVROLET TAHOE 29,949 2016 8 85,000 POLICE POOL08 B223 CHEV TAHOE 2020 CHEVROLET TAHOE 29,949 2016 8 85,000 POLICE POOL08 B224 CHEV TAHOE 2020 CHEVROLET TAHOE 29,948 2016 8 85,000 POLICE POOL08 B225 CHEV TAHOE 2020 CHEVROLET TAHOE 29,949 2016 8 85,000 POLICE POOL08 B226 CHEV TAHOE 2020 CHEVROLET TAHOE 30,997 2016 8 85,000 POLICE POOL10 B194 FORD POLICE UTILITY 2010 2015 FORD POLICE UTILITY 33,763 2015 8 85,000 POLICE POOL07 B201 CHEV TAHOE 2020 CHEVROLET TAHOE 32,959 2015 8 85,000 POLICE POOL08 B205 CHEV TAHOE 2020 CHEVROLET TAHOE 32,959 2015 8 85,000 POLICE POOL08 B206 CHEV TAHOE 2020 CHEVROLET TAHOE 32,959 2015 8 85,000 POLICE POOL09 B207 CHEV TAHOE 2020 CHEVROLET TAHOE - K9 32,959 2015 8 100,000 POLICE POOL08 B208 CHEV TAHOE 2020 CHEVROLET TAHOE 32,959 2015 8 85,000 POLICE POOL10 B209 CHEV TAHOE 2020 CHEVROLET TAHOE 32,959 2015 8 85,000 POLICE POOL04 B210 CHEV TAHOE 2020 CHEVROLET TAHOE - SRO 32,959 2015 8 85,000 STREETS POOL25 S177 BEAN SPRAYER 5060 JOHN BEAN SPRAYER 9,199 2000 10 20,000 STREETS POOL25 D105 FRLN FL80 2200 5/6 YD DUMP FL80 96,441 2002 15 250,000 SURFACE WATER POOL26 S161 SULL D185QV 7100 TRL MTD AIR COMPRESSOR 10,601 1996 10 29,900 CS PARKS POOL31 C213 Dodge 3500 2060 FLATBED DUMP 24,183 2002 15 65,000 CS PARKS POOL31 C247 FORD F250 2060 PICKUP 3/4 TON 21,538 2008 10 57,000 CS PARKS POOL31 C250 FORD F250 2060 PICKUP 3/4 TON 21,538 2008 10 57,000 CS PARKS POOL31 D106 FORD F450 2090 BUCKET TRUCK 70,142 2001 15 255,000 CS PARKS POOL31 D118 FORD F350 2080 DUMP 1 TON 34,873 2008 10 58,500 CS PARKS POOL31 D119 FORD F350 2080 DUMP 1 TON 30,236 2008 10 58,500 CS PARKS POOL31 P009 LNCN WELDER 6425 ARC WELDER 1,600 1995 10 7,150 CS PARKS POOL31 P015 HWRD ROTO TILLER 3910 ROTO TILLER 2,649 1995 15 20,800 CS PARKS POOL31 P079 SPLT SPRAY TANK E SPRAY TANK 1,088 1995 8 4,550 CS PARKS POOL31 P084 SPLT SPRAY TANK E SPRAY TANK 1,039 1995 8 4,550 CS PARKS POOL31 P112 FRYS TRAILER 6000 TRAILER 3,547 2000 15 13,000 CS PARKS POOL31 P117 BROY 5054X2 3910 ROTO TILLER 5,731 1999 10 13,000 CS PARKS POOL31 P118 BROY 5054X2 3910 ROTO TILLER 2,394 1999 10 13,000 CS PARKS POOL31 P119 BROY 5054X2 3910 ROTO TILLER 6,172 1999 10 13,000 CS PARKS POOL31 P122 JNDR LOADER TILLER 3900 TRACTOR 27,047 2002 10 45,500 CS PARKS POOL31 P125 TORO SANDPRO 5050 ROTARY MOWER 13,577 2003 5 39,000 CS PARKS POOL31 P127 FRYS TRAILER 6425 ARC WELDER 3,152 2003 15 9,100 CS PARKS POOL31 P130 JNDR PROGATOR 5060 PRO GATOR 16,439 2004 10 26,000 PW AIRPORT POOL20 C234 FORD F150 2034 PICKUP 1/2 TON 18,165 2007 8 45,500 PW STREET MAINT POOL25 D123 FORD F550 2070 FLATBED 1 TON 42,675 2008 10 24,139 PW STREET MAINT POOL25 E109 INGERSOL DD34HF 3200 VIBRATOR 46,761 2005 10 145,600 PW STREET MAINT POOL25 S208 MNRO MSPV-96-50-32 4100 SANDER/SPREADER 8,367 2008 10 26,000 PW SURFACE WATER MAINT POOL26 C217 FORD F250 2060 PICKUP 24,946 2002 8 11,945 PW SURFACE WATER MAINT POOL26 S125 BEAN SPRAYER 6700 SPRAYER 1,000 1985 5 7,150 PW TRANS SYSTEM MAINT POOL23 S057 UTIL POLE TRL 6400 TRAILER STAKE 370 1968 15 32,500 PW STREET MAINT POOL25 TBD FORD F550 2085 TRUCK 1 TON - TBD 15 55,812 PW WATER MAINT POOL27 B097 WORK GRUMMAN 2390 STEP VAN 33,727 2001 8 78,000 PW WATER MAINT POOL27 B141 DMCH SPRINTER 2390 STEP VAN 43,377 2008 10 72,185 PW WATER MAINT POOL27 B142 DMCH SPRINTER 2390 STEP VAN 43,377 2008 10 72,185 PW WATER MAINT POOL27 C254 CHEV SILVERADO 2034 PICKUP 1/2 TON 24,682 2008 10 42,073 PW WATER MAINT POOL27 D100 FORD F550 2080 STAKEBED DUMP 39,428 2000 10 25,000 PW WATER MAINT POOL27 E123 CASE 580SM 3500 BACKHOE 96,714 2008 10 200,200 PW WATER MAINT POOL27 S191 DEERE 345 5050 ROTARY MOWER 6,892 2002 5 39,000 PW WATER MAINT POOL27 S218 DEERE X720 5000 MOWER 9,652 2011 5 26,000 CS PARKS TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD 4X4 TRUCK - TBD TBD 75,000 CS PARKS TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD 4X4 TRUCK - TBD TBD 75,000 CS PARKS TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD FLATBED TRUCK - TBD TBD 90,000 PW SOLID WASTE MAINT TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD 1 TON SLW FLATBED DUMP TRUCK - TBD TBD 90,000 CS PARKS TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD 4X4 TRUCK - TBD TBD 75,000 CS PARKS TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD 4X4 TRUCK - TBD TBD 75,000 CS PARKS POOL31 C268 CHEV COLARADO 2000 PU COMPACT 28,698 2015 8 58,500 IT POOL49 B125 DMCH COMMANDER 2010 UTIL VEH COMP 23,893 2007 8 70,000 PW AIRPORT POOL20 S224 DEERE 1585 5050 MOWER, RIDING 75,000 2012 5 50,000 PW STREET MAINT POOL25 S182 VERMEER BC1800XL 6281 CHIPPER/SHREDDER 35,800 2001 6 130,000 CS PARKS POOL31 C239 FORD F250 2060 PU 3/4 TON 22,599 2007 10 60,000 CS PARKS POOL31 C240 FORD F250 2060 PU 3/4 TON 21,619 2007 10 60,000 CS PARKS POOL31 P144 TORO 4000 5050 MOWER, RIDING 55,246 2009 15 103,000 CS PARKS POOL31 D106 FORD F450 2090 CHERRY PICKER 60,940 2001 10 275,000 Police POOL07 M057 HDMC FLHTP DOM 1000 MOTORCYCLE 36,522 2015 4 60,000 Police POOL10 B202 Chev TAHOE 2020 UTIL VEH FULL 47,932 2015 8 100,000 Police POOL02 B220 Chev TAHOE 2020 UTIL VEH FULL 54,832 2016 8 100,000 Police POOL07 B221 Chev TAHOE 2020 UTIL VEH FULL 53,825 2016 8 100,000 Police POOL08 B227 Chev TAHOE 2020 UTIL VEH FULL 55,256 2016 8 100,000 Police POOL08 B230 Chev TAHOE 2020 UTIL VEH FULL 51,040 2017 8 100,000 Police POOL04 B231 Chev TAHOE 2020 UTIL VEH FULL 50,514 2017 8 100,000 Police POOL08 B233 Chev TAHOE 2020 UTIL VEH FULL 49,972 2017 8 100,000 Police POOL07 B236 Chev TAHOE 2020 UTIL VEH FULL 48,396 2017 8 100,000 Police POOL08 B237 Chev TAHOE 2020 UTIL VEH FULL 54,985 2017 8 100,000 Police POOL08 B241 Chev TAHOE 2020 UTIL VEH FULL 51,555 2017 8 100,000 Water POOL27 D110 T800 Kenworth 2200 DUMP TRUCK 71,115 2007 15 266,000 Surface Water POOL26 E138 T800 Kenworth 2660 VACTOR 361,779 2015 5 750,000 Street POOL25 E148 Elgin Elgin 2640 STREET SWEEPER 266,978 2015 5 500,000 Police TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD 4 New Police Vehicles - TBD TBD 400,000 Facilities TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD New - TBD TBD 70,000 Utility Maintenance TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD New - TBD TBD 70,000 Fund 501 - Equipment Rental Fund 2025-2026 Vehicle Acquisitions/Replacements Page 1 of 2 AGENDA ITEM #1. d) Dept Assigned Charge Code Equipment Number Make Model Class Description Original Cost Year Purchased Life 2025 Adjusted Budget 2026 Adjusted Budget Fund 501 - Equipment Rental Fund 2025-2026 Vehicle Acquisitions/Replacements Police POOL07 B203 Chev TAHOE 2020 UTIL VEH FULL 44,637 2015 8 100,000 Police POOL04 B204 Chev TAHOE 2020 UTIL VEH FULL 44,084 2015 8 100,000 Police POOL02 B212 Chev TAHOE 2020 UTIL VEH FULL 69,884 2015 8 100,000 Police POOL09 B228 Chev TAHOE 2020 UTIL VEH FULL 58,656 2016 8 100,000 Police POOL07 B242 Chev TAHOE 2020 UTIL VEH FULL 48,107 2017 8 100,000 Police POOL09 B243 Chev TAHOE 2020 UTIL VEH FULL 53,998 2017 8 100,000 Police POOL02 B244 Chev TAHOE 2020 UTIL VEH FULL 56,257 2017 8 100,000 Police POOL08 B255 Chev TAHOE 2020 UTIL VEH FULL 81,464 2018 8 100,000 Police POOL09 B256 Chev TAHOE 2020 UTIL VEH FULL 81,464 2018 8 100,000 Police POOL09 B257 Chev TAHOE 2020 UTIL VEH FULL 81,739 2018 8 100,000 Police POOL09 B258 Chev TAHOE 2020 UTIL VEH FULL 82,014 2018 8 100,000 Police POOL08 B259 Chev TAHOE 2020 UTIL VEH FULL 82,124 2018 8 100,000 Police POOL08 B260 Chev TAHOE 2020 UTIL VEH FULL 81,681 2018 8 100,000 Police POOL08 B261 Chev TAHOE 2020 UTIL VEH FULL 81,448 2018 8 100,000 Police POOL08 B262 Chev TAHOE 2020 UTIL VEH FULL 81,998 2018 8 100,000 Police POOL08 B263 Chev TAHOE 2020 UTIL VEH FULL 81,823 2018 8 100,000 Police POOL08 B264 Chev TAHOE 2020 UTIL VEH FULL 81,511 2018 8 100,000 Police POOL08 B265 Chev TAHOE 2020 UTIL VEH FULL 74,927 2018 8 100,000 Police POOL08 B266 Chev TAHOE 2020 UTIL VEH FULL 74,264 2018 8 100,000 Police POOL08 B267 Chev TAHOE 2020 UTIL VEH FULL 74,711 2018 8 100,000 Police POOL08 B268 Chev TAHOE 2020 UTIL VEH FULL 74,848 2018 8 100,000 Police POOL08 B269 Chev TAHOE 2020 UTIL VEH FULL 74,649 2018 8 100,000 Police POOL08 B270 Chev TAHOE 2020 UTIL VEH FULL 74,649 2018 8 100,000 Police POOL08 B271 Chev TAHOE 2020 UTIL VEH FULL 74,649 2018 8 100,000 Police POOL08 B272 Chev TAHOE 2020 UTIL VEH FULL 74,893 2018 8 100,000 Street POOL25 E149 Elgin Elgin 2640 STREET SWEEPER 256,544 2015 5 500,000 Street POOL25 E152 Global Global 2640 STREET SWEEPER 264,027 2019 5 500,000 231,157 Total:9,082,496$ 3,500,000$ 2024 Replaced Vehicles Upfits Page 2 of 2 AGENDA ITEM #1. d) 1 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. ________ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE CITY OF RENTON FISCAL YEARS 2025/2026 BIENNIAL BUDGET AS ADOPTED BY ORDINANCE NO. 6147 AND AMENDED BY ORDINANCE NOS. 6156, 6158 AND 6163, BY INCREASING THE BUDGETED REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES BY $64,410,665 AND $76,520,979 RESPECTIVELY, AUTHORIZING POSITION CHANGES, AMENDING THE 2025 SALARY TABLE, AND ADOPTING THE 2026 SALARY TABLE; AUTHORIZING SEPARATION PAY FOR ELIMINATED POSITIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, on November 18, 2024, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 6147 adopting the City of Renton’s 2025/2026 Biennial Budget, incorporating therein the job classifications and pay ranges for City employees set forth in the 2025 City of Renton Salary Table; and WHEREAS, on December 2, 2024, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 6156 amending and replacing the 2025 City of Renton Salary Table; and WHEREAS, on May 5, 2025, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 6158 amending the 2025/2026 Biennial Budget, increasing the budgeted revenues and expenditures, and amending the 2025 City of Renton Salary Table; and WHEREAS, on July 21, 2025, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 6163 amending the 2025/2026 Biennial Budget, increasing the budgeted revenues and expenditures, eliminating Fund 505, and amending the 2025 City of Renton Salary Table; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 35A.34 RCW, the City Council is required to provide for a mid-biennial review, and any modification thereto no sooner than eight months after the start, but no later than the conclusion of the first year of the biennium; and AGENDA ITEM #2. a) ORDINANCE NO. ________ 2 WHEREAS, minor corrections and the recognition of grants, contributions and associated costs, and new cost items not previously included in the budget require additional adjustments to the 2025/2026 Biennial Budget; and WHEREAS, the New Family First Center Development Fund (346) previously established by the City of Renton is no longer an active and utilized capital investment program (CIP) fund; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to amend the 2025 City of Renton Salary Table to reflect the conversion of the Economic Development Assistant Director position at M36 to the Business Recruitment and Retention Manager at M36; and make changes to the currently authorized 2025 positions as shown in Exhibit C to this ordinance: add one new Full-Time Equivalent (1 FTE) Code Compliance Manager position at M32; add one new Full-Time Equivalent (1 FTE) Assistant Building Official position at M34; add one new Full-Time Equivalent (1 FTE) Human Services Director at M41; remove one Full-Time Equivalent (1 FTE) Administrative Secretary 1 position at A10; add one new Full-Time Equivalent (1 FTE) Engineering Specialist 1 at A14; and make changes to position titles as follows: change Vehicle & Equipment Mechanic to Vehicle & Equipment Mechanic 2 at A16 and create a position series to include Vehicle & Equipment Mechanic 1 position at A12; change Senior Human Resources Analyst – DEI to Senior Human Resources Analyst – Workforce & Equity; and change Assistant Airport Manager to Airport Operations Manager; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to adopt the 2026 City of Renton Salary Table as shown in Exhibit D to this ordinance, reflecting grade and step changes of various non-represented positions based on a comprehensive non-represented pay-equity salary study that was AGENDA ITEM #2. a) ORDINANCE NO. ________ 3 conducted to determine how to expand pay scales to be in line with market comps and create a new salary table that aligns with similar market non-represented positions from comparable agencies; reflecting cost of living adjustments required by collective bargaining agreements and, for non-represented employees, consistent with the negotiated cost of living increases for AFSCME members; and reflecting changes to the currently authorized 2026 positions as follows: remove two Full-Time Equivalent (2 FTE) Electronic Home Detention Coordinator positions previously at pn61; remove one Full-Time Equivalent (1 FTE) Human Services Manager position at NR22; remove one Full-Time Equivalent (1 FTE) Museum Manager position at NR19; add one Full-Time Equivalent (1 FTE) Prosecuting Attorney position at NR22; add one Full-Time Equivalent (1 FTE) Paralegal position at A18; and add one Full-Time Equivalent (1 FTE) Recreation Supervisor position at NR16; and make a change to a position title as follows: change Deputy City Clerk/Public Records Officer to Deputy City Clerk/Public Disclosure Manager; and WHEREAS, the reorganization reflected in the amended budget involves elimination of positions, including positions that may be filled, resulting in the layoff of affected employees through no fault of their own; and WHEREAS, the City Council recognizes the contributions of these employees and desires to mitigate the financial hardship of such layoffs by authorizing the provision of separation pay as a gesture of appreciation and fairness, contingent upon the employee’s execution of a complete release of claims against the City; and WHEREAS, to ensure flexibility in addressing individual circumstances, potential negotiation requirements, and budgetary constraints, the City Council finds it appropriate to AGENDA ITEM #2. a) ORDINANCE NO. ________ 4 grant the Mayor discretion in determining the amount of separation pay offered to each eligible employee, not to exceed available budgeted funds; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The City of Renton’s 2025/2026 Biennial Budget, originally adopted by Ordinance No. 6147 and last amended by Ordinance No. 6163 is hereby amended to increase revenues by $64,410,665, for an amended total revenue of $771,958,723 over the biennium, and increase expenditures by $76,520,979, for an amended total expenditure of $914,159,258 over the biennium. SECTION II. The City Council hereby adopts the amended 2025/2026 Biennial Budget. The 2025 Mid-Biennial Budget Adjustment Summary by Fund is attached as Exhibit A and the 2026 Adjusted Budget Summary by Fund is attached as Exhibit B. Detailed lists of adjustments are filed and available for public review in the Office of the City Clerk at Renton City Hall. SECTION III. The New Family First Center Development Fund (346) is hereby closed and eliminated with the available balance transferred to Fund 316, Municipal Facilities Capital Investment Program. SECTION IV. The City Council hereby amends and replaces the 2025 City of Renton Salary Table and authorizes revisions to authorized positions as set forth in Exhibit C. The amendments to the Salary Table shall take effect on the effective date of this ordinance, and are intended to be consistent with all applicable collective bargaining agreements. In the event of conflicts, applicable collective bargaining agreements control. Red font, strikethrough, and underline are for illustrative purposes only to reflect changes. AGENDA ITEM #2. a) ORDINANCE NO. ________ 5 SECTION V. The City Council hereby adopts the 2026 City of Renton Salary Table and authorizes revisions to authorized positions as set forth in Exhibit D to be effective on January 1. 2026. The adopted Salary Table is intended to be consistent with all applicable collective bargaining agreements. In the event of conflicts, applicable collective bargaining agreements control. SECTION VI. The Mayor is authorized to offer and provide separation pay to any City employee who is laid off as a direct result of a reorganization that eliminates their filled position. The provision of separation pay shall be conditioned upon the employee’s execution of a complete release of all claims against the City, in a form approved by the City Attorney. The amount of separation pay for each eligible employee shall be determined at the sole discretion of the Mayor, based on factors including length of service, position level, provided that such payments shall not exceed the amounts allocated in the City's adopted budget or as otherwise approved by City Council. The Council hereby ratifies any such agreement that was entered into prior to this ordinance. SECTION VII. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality thereof shall not affect the constitutionality of any other section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this ordinance. SECTION VIII. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect five (5) days after publication of a summary of this ordinance in the City's official newspaper. The summary shall consist of this ordinance's title. AGENDA ITEM #2. a) ORDINANCE NO. ________ 6 PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2025. ______________________________ Jason A. Seth, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2025. ______________________________ Armondo Pavone, Mayor Approved as to form: Shane Moloney, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD-FIN:25ORD020: 10/7/2025 AGENDA ITEM #2. a) ORDINANCE NO. ________ 7 Exhibit A: 2025 2nd Quarter Budget Adjustment Summary by Fund AGENDA ITEM #2. a) BEGINNING FUND BALANCE REVENUES EXPENDITURES ENDING FUND BALANCE Fund 2025 Beg Fund Bal Changes 2025 Adjusted Fund Bal 2025 Budgeted Revenue Changes 2025 Adjusted Revenue 2025 Budgeted Expenditure Changes 2025 Adjusted Expenditure Ending Fund Balance Reserved/ Designated Available Fund Balance 0XX GENERAL FUND 115,968,224 - 115,968,224 140,674,865 10,618,334 151,293,199 153,311,658 15,337,496 168,649,154 98,612,269 (22,737,899) 75,874,370 110 SPECIAL HOTEL-MOTEL TAX 1,184,978 - 1,184,978 355,000 - 355,000 644,939 - 644,939 895,040 895,040 127 CABLE COMMUNICATIONS DEVELOPMENT 372,210 - 372,210 60,000 - 60,000 97,674 25,000 122,674 309,536 309,536 130 HOUSING AND SUPPORTIVE SERVICES 15,430,639 - 15,430,639 4,030,000 - 4,030,000 6,595,719 92,500 6,688,219 12,772,420 12,772,420 135 SPRINGBROOK WETLANDS BANK 722,963 - 722,963 - - - 40,000 - 40,000 682,963 682,963 140 POLICE SEIZURE 790,432 - 790,432 - - - 790,432 - 790,432 - - 141 POLICE CSAM SEIZURE 132,667 - 132,667 - - - 132,667 - 132,667 - - 150 AFFORDABLE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT 292,923 - 292,923 - - - - - - 292,923 292,923 215 GENERAL GOVERNMENT MISC DEBT SVC 5,812,247 - 5,812,247 2,950,225 - 2,950,225 2,952,717 - 2,952,717 5,809,755 (2,706,325) 3,103,430 303 COMMUNITY SERVICES IMPACT MITIGATION 359,743 - 359,743 100,000 - 100,000 105,000 - 105,000 354,743 354,743 304 FIRE IMPACT MITIGATION 2,489 - 2,489 200,000 - 200,000 200,000 - 200,000 2,489.31 (2,489) - 305 TRANSPORTATION IMPACT MITIGATION 3,613,321 - 3,613,321 1,000,000 - 1,000,000 1,450,935 - 1,450,935 3,162,387 3,162,387 308 REET 1 5,060,894 - 5,060,894 2,520,000 - 2,520,000 4,560,000 2,000,000 6,560,000 1,020,894 1,020,894 309 REET 2 2,312,665 - 2,312,665 2,520,000 - 2,520,000 2,799,625 - 2,799,625 2,033,040 2,033,040 31X SCHOOL DISTRICT IMPACT MITIGATION 2,368 - 2,368 600,000 - 600,000 600,000 - 600,000 2,368 - 2,368 316 MUNICIPAL FACILITIES CIP 28,180,515 - 28,180,515 20,312,336 20,930,998 41,243,334 42,751,490 24,034,885 66,786,375 2,637,475 2,637,475 317 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT 14,132,444 - 14,132,444 33,179,715 1,190,948 34,370,663 42,796,146 1,975,474 44,771,621 3,731,486 3,731,486 346 NEW FAMILY FIRST CENTER DEVELOPMENT 3,937,547 - 3,937,547 - 82,641 82,641 - 4,020,187 4,020,187 - - 402 AIRPORT OPERATIONS & CIP 13,353,300 - 13,353,300 5,151,234 17,909,098 23,060,331 15,251,099 17,925,652 33,176,751 3,236,881 (287,557) 2,949,324 403 SOLID WASTE UTILITY 3,972,834 - 3,972,834 27,285,119 1,131,694 28,416,813 27,714,646 1,133,778 28,848,424 3,541,223 (400,000) 3,141,223 404 GOLF COURSE SYSTEM & CAPITAL 2,611,728 - 2,611,728 4,650,594 - 4,650,594 5,390,273 1,998 5,392,271 1,870,050 (998,353) 871,697 405 WATER OPERATIONS & CAPITAL 56,673,939 - 56,673,939 19,912,731 30,751 19,943,481 51,889,092 54,148 51,943,239 24,674,180 (3,157,328) 21,516,852 406 WASTEWATER OPERATIONS & CAPITAL 27,706,296 - 27,706,296 12,765,439 - 12,765,439 27,854,666 9,815 27,864,481 12,607,253 (1,677,307) 10,929,946 407 SURFACE WATER OPERATIONS & CAPITAL 25,766,980 - 25,766,980 32,714,435 (2,126,063) 30,588,372 40,617,905 (1,965,108) 38,652,798 17,702,554 (2,068,195) 15,634,359 416 KING COUNTY METRO 7,647,811 - 7,647,811 22,791,462 500,000 23,291,462 22,791,462 500,000 23,291,462 7,647,811 (380,000) 7,267,811 501 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 19,535,828 - 19,535,828 7,163,736 - 7,163,736 12,050,727 792,160 12,842,887 13,856,677 (13,856,677) - 502 INSURANCE 25,781,346 - 25,781,346 8,020,527 2,400,000 10,420,527 7,970,555 1,447,132 9,417,688 26,784,185 (22,268,021) 4,516,164 503 INFORMATION SERVICES 9,632,207 - 9,632,207 10,106,932 (52,868) 10,054,064 14,508,707 199,582 14,708,289 4,977,982 (2,785,647) 2,192,335 504 FACILITIES 1,962,169 - 1,962,169 7,696,815 - 7,696,815 8,046,138 39,837 8,085,974 1,573,009 (970,317) 602,692 505 COMMUNICATIONS 779,556 - 779,556 3,791 - 3,791 783,348 - 783,348 - - 512 HEALTHCARE INSURANCE 10,517,642 - 10,517,642 16,538,492 - 16,538,492 17,049,360 - 17,049,360 10,006,774 (5,114,808) 4,891,966 522 LEOFF1 RETIREES HEALTHCARE 20,672,179 - 20,672,179 920,000 - 920,000 1,686,222 - 1,686,222 19,905,957 (19,905,957) - 611 FIREMENS PENSION 9,636,752 - 9,636,752 1,500,000 - 1,500,000 275,475 50,000 325,475 10,811,277 (10,811,277) - Total Other Funds 318,591,613 - 318,591,613 245,048,581 41,997,199 287,045,780 360,397,017 52,337,041 412,734,058 192,903,336 (87,390,259) 105,513,077 TOTAL ALL FUNDS 434,559,837 - 434,559,837 385,723,446 52,615,533 438,338,979 513,708,675 67,674,538 581,383,212 291,515,604 (110,128,157) 181,387,447 CARRY FORWARD 34,979 CARRY FORWARD 156,891 NEW 52,580,553 NEW 67,517,647 2025 Adjustment By Fund H:\Finance\Budget\2025-2026 Budget\2.Budget Adjustments\03_2025.Mid.Bi\00MASTER_2025.Q3 Mid-Bi Budget Amendment AG E N D A I T E M # 2 . a ) ORDINANCE NO. ________ 8 Exhibit B: 2026 Budget Adjustment Summary by Fund AGENDA ITEM #2. a) BEGINNING FUND BALANCE REVENUES EXPENDITURES ENDING FUND BALANCE Fund 2026 Beg Fund Bal Changes 2026 Adjusted Fund Bal 2026 Budgeted Revenue Changes 2026 Adjusted Revenue 2026 Budgeted Expenditure Changes 2026 Adjusted Expenditure Ending Fund Balance Reserved/ Designated Available Fund Balance 0XX GENERAL FUND 103,339,181 (4,726,913) 98,612,269 141,097,362 8,910,000 150,007,362 146,616,994 6,787,087 153,404,081 95,215,550 (20,908,490) 74,307,060 110 SPECIAL HOTEL-MOTEL TAX 895,040 - 895,040 350,000 - 350,000 - - - 1,245,040 1,245,040 127 CABLE COMMUNICATIONS DEVELOPMENT 334,536 (25,000) 309,536 60,000 - 60,000 97,674 - 97,674 271,862 271,862 130 HOUSING AND SUPPORTIVE SERVICES 16,264,920 (3,492,500) 12,772,420 4,030,000 - 4,030,000 1,750,000 185,000 1,935,000 14,867,420 14,867,420 135 SPRINGBROOK WETLANDS BANK 682,963 - 682,963 - - - 40,000 - 40,000 642,963 642,963 140 POLICE SEIZURE - - - - - - - - - - - 141 POLICE CSAM SEIZURE - - - - - - - - - - - 150 AFFORDABLE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT 292,923 - 292,923 - - - - - - 292,923 - 292,923 215 GENERAL GOVERNMENT MISC DEBT SVC 5,782,755 27,000 5,809,755 2,943,075 - 2,943,075 2,941,644 - 2,941,644 5,811,186 (2,704,675) 3,106,511 303 COMMUNITY SERVICES IMPACT MITIGATION 354,743 - 354,743 100,000 - 100,000 - - - 454,743 454,743 304 FIRE IMPACT MITIGATION 2,489 - 2,489 200,000 - 200,000 200,000 - 200,000 2,489 (2,489) - 305 TRANSPORTATION IMPACT MITIGATION 4,363,321 (1,200,935) 3,162,387 1,000,000 - 1,000,000 749,000 - 749,000 3,413,387 3,413,387 308 REET 1 3,020,894 (2,000,000) 1,020,894 2,520,000 - 2,520,000 900,000 (200,000) 700,000 2,840,894 2,840,894 309 REET 2 2,033,040 - 2,033,040 2,520,000 - 2,520,000 2,146,475 - 2,146,475 2,406,565 2,406,565 31X SCHOOL DISTRICT IMPACT MITIGATION 2,368 - 2,368 600,000 (590,000) 10,000 600,000 (590,000) 10,000 2,368 - 2,368 316 MUNICIPAL FACILITIES CIP 9,936,301 (7,298,826) 2,637,475 2,800,000 (200,000) 2,600,000 2,400,000 (200,000) 2,200,000 3,037,475 3,037,475 317 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT 5,494,006 (1,762,520) 3,731,486 5,625,000 - 5,625,000 5,460,000 - 5,460,000 3,896,486 3,896,486 346 NEW FAMILY FIRST CENTER DEVELOPMENT 3,937,547 (3,937,547) - - - - - - - - - 402 AIRPORT OPERATIONS & CIP 6,721,411 (3,484,530) 3,236,881 4,903,287 - 4,903,287 4,539,908 21,554 4,561,462 3,578,706 (297,346) 3,281,359 403 SOLID WASTE UTILITY 3,513,550 27,672 3,541,223 27,217,815 1,000,000 28,217,815 28,235,332 1,007,084 29,242,416 2,516,622 (400,000) 2,116,622 404 GOLF COURSE SYSTEM & CAPITAL 1,898,055 (28,004) 1,870,050 4,803,170 - 4,803,170 4,724,709 16,998 4,741,707 1,931,513 (1,060,123) 871,391 405 WATER OPERATIONS & CAPITAL 24,666,731 7,450 24,674,180 19,878,544 - 19,878,544 18,738,537 38,397 18,776,935 25,775,790 (3,221,283) 22,554,507 406 WASTEWATER OPERATIONS & CAPITAL 12,583,378 23,875 12,607,253 13,042,313 - 13,042,313 12,288,335 24,815 12,313,150 13,336,417 (1,694,805) 11,641,612 407 SURFACE WATER OPERATIONS & CAPITAL 17,833,242 (130,688) 17,702,554 14,505,148 - 14,505,148 14,119,678 25,955 14,145,633 18,062,069 (2,076,264) 15,985,805 416 KING COUNTY METRO 7,647,811 - 7,647,811 23,791,462 1,200,000 24,991,462 23,791,462 1,200,000 24,991,462 7,647,811 (380,000) 7,267,811 501 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 15,152,837 (1,296,160) 13,856,677 6,771,008 - 6,771,008 6,842,794 400,000 7,242,794 13,384,891 (13,384,891) - 502 INSURANCE 26,091,818 692,368 26,784,185 6,073,908 1,500,000 7,573,908 8,471,547 (52,868) 8,418,679 25,939,414 (19,418,731) 6,520,683 503 INFORMATION SERVICES 5,511,683 (533,700) 4,977,982 10,071,742 (44,868) 10,026,875 9,848,853 67,582 9,916,435 5,088,422 (2,785,647) 2,302,774 504 FACILITIES 1,903,704 (330,695) 1,573,009 8,018,031 20,000 8,038,031 8,183,182 64,837 8,248,019 1,363,022 (163,563) 1,199,459 505 COMMUNICATIONS 779,556 (779,556) - - - - - - - - - 512 HEALTHCARE INSURANCE 10,006,774 - 10,006,774 17,682,747 - 17,682,747 18,202,177 - 18,202,177 9,487,344 (5,460,653) 4,026,690 522 LEOFF1 RETIREES HEALTHCARE 19,905,957 - 19,905,957 920,000 - 920,000 1,776,327 - 1,776,327 19,049,630 (19,049,630) - 611 FIREMENS PENSION 10,861,277 (50,000) 10,811,277 300,000 - 300,000 264,975 50,000 314,975 10,796,302 (10,796,302) - Total Other Funds 218,475,632 (25,572,296) 192,903,336 180,727,250 2,885,132 183,612,382 177,312,610 2,059,354 179,371,964 197,143,753 (82,896,402) 114,247,351 TOTAL ALL FUNDS 321,814,813 (30,299,209) 291,515,604 321,824,612 11,795,132 333,619,744 323,929,604 8,846,441 332,776,046 292,359,303 (103,804,892) 188,554,411 2 year total 707,548,058 64,410,665 771,958,723 837,638,279 76,520,979 914,159,258 292,359,303 (103,804,892) 188,554,411 CARRY FORWARD - CARRY FORWARD - NEW 11,795,132 NEW 8,846,441 2026 Adjustment By Fund H:\Finance\Budget\2025-2026 Budget\2.Budget Adjustments\03_2025.Mid.Bi\00MASTER_2025.Q3 Mid-Bi Budget Amendment AG E N D A I T E M # 2 . a ) ORDINANCE NO. ________ 9 Exhibit C: 2025 Amended Salary Table AGENDA ITEM #2. a) 3.8% Grade Position Title Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Current FTE /Remov al Revised FTE 1 1 e10 Mayor (1) 18,094 217,128 18,094 217,128 1 1 e09 City Council President (2)(7) 6 6 e09 City Council Members (2) 2 2 e11 Municipal Court Judge (6) Salary established pursuant to RMC 3-10-2.E 1 1 m53 Chief Administrative Officer 16,390 196,680 17,226 206,712 18,094 217,128 19,008 228,096 19,960 239,520 1 1 m52 Police Chief (3) 15,988 191,856 16,798 201,576 17,655 211,860 18,549 222,588 19,476 233,712 m51 15,599 187,188 16,390 196,680 17,226 206,712 18,094 217,128 19,008 228,096 m50 15,217 182,604 15,988 191,856 16,798 201,576 17,655 211,860 18,549 222,588 1 1 m49 City Attorney 14,852 178,224 15,599 187,188 16,390 196,680 17,226 206,712 18,094 217,128 1 1 m49 Parks & Recreation Administrator 14,852 178,224 15,599 187,188 16,390 196,680 17,226 206,712 18,094 217,128 1 1 m49 Community & Economic Development Administrator 14,852 178,224 15,599 187,188 16,390 196,680 17,226 206,712 18,094 217,128 1 1 m49 Deputy Chief Administrative Officer 14,852 178,224 15,599 187,188 16,390 196,680 17,226 206,712 18,094 217,128 1 1 m49 Finance Administrator 14,852 178,224 15,599 187,188 16,390 196,680 17,226 206,712 18,094 217,128 1 1 m49 Human Resources & Risk Mgmt Administrator 14,852 178,224 15,599 187,188 16,390 196,680 17,226 206,712 18,094 217,128 1 1 m49 Judicial Administrative Officer 14,852 178,224 15,599 187,188 16,390 196,680 17,226 206,712 18,094 217,128 1 1 m49 Public Works Administrator 14,852 178,224 15,599 187,188 16,390 196,680 17,226 206,712 18,094 217,128 2 2 m48 Police Deputy Chief (4) 14,486 173,832 15,217 182,604 15,988 191,856 16,798 201,576 17,655 211,860 m47 14,134 169,608 14,852 178,224 15,599 187,188 16,390 196,680 17,226 206,712 1 1 m46 Prosecution Director 13,789 165,468 14,486 173,832 15,217 182,604 15,988 191,856 16,798 201,576 m45 13,454 161,448 14,134 169,608 14,852 178,224 15,599 187,188 16,390 196,680 m44 13,128 157,536 13,789 165,468 14,486 173,832 15,217 182,604 15,988 191,856 1 1 m43 Economic Development Director 12,803 153,636 13,454 161,448 14,134 169,608 14,852 178,224 15,599 187,188 6 6 m42 Police Commander (5) 12,492 149,904 13,128 157,536 13,789 165,468 14,486 173,832 15,217 182,604 3 3 m42 Sr Assistant City Attorney 12,492 149,904 13,128 157,536 13,789 165,468 14,486 173,832 15,217 182,604 1 1 m41 Finance Director 12,190 146,280 12,803 153,636 13,454 161,448 14,134 169,608 14,852 178,224 0 1 1 m41 Human Services Director 12,190 146,280 12,803 153,636 13,454 161,448 14,134 169,608 14,852 178,224 1 1 m41 Information Technology Director 12,190 146,280 12,803 153,636 13,454 161,448 14,134 169,608 14,852 178,224 1 1 m40 Airport Director 11,893 142,716 12,492 149,904 13,128 157,536 13,789 165,468 14,486 173,832 1 1 m40 Development Engineering Director 11,893 142,716 12,492 149,904 13,128 157,536 13,789 165,468 14,486 173,832 1 1 m40 Development Services Director 11,893 142,716 12,492 149,904 13,128 157,536 13,789 165,468 14,486 173,832 1 1 m40 Facilities Director 11,893 142,716 12,492 149,904 13,128 157,536 13,789 165,468 14,486 173,832 1 1 m40 Maintenance Services Director 11,893 142,716 12,492 149,904 13,128 157,536 13,789 165,468 14,486 173,832 1 1 m40 Planning Director 11,893 142,716 12,492 149,904 13,128 157,536 13,789 165,468 14,486 173,832 1 1 m40 Transportation Systems Director 11,893 142,716 12,492 149,904 13,128 157,536 13,789 165,468 14,486 173,832 1 1 m40 Utility Systems Director 11,893 142,716 12,492 149,904 13,128 157,536 13,789 165,468 14,486 173,832 m39 11,603 139,236 12,190 146,280 12,803 153,636 13,454 161,448 14,134 169,608 1 1 m38 City Clerk/Public Records Officer 11,320 135,840 11,893 142,716 12,492 149,904 13,128 157,536 13,789 165,468 1 1 m38 Communications and Engagement Director 11,320 135,840 11,893 142,716 12,492 149,904 13,128 157,536 13,789 165,468 1 1 m38 Emergency Management Director 11,320 135,840 11,893 142,716 12,492 149,904 13,128 157,536 13,789 165,468 1 1 m38 Enterprise Applications Manager 11,320 135,840 11,893 142,716 12,492 149,904 13,128 157,536 13,789 165,468 1 1 m38 HR Labor Relations & Compensation Manager 11,320 135,840 11,893 142,716 12,492 149,904 13,128 157,536 13,789 165,468 1 1 m38 Infrastructure & Security Manager 11,320 135,840 11,893 142,716 12,492 149,904 13,128 157,536 13,789 165,468 1 1 m38 Lead Prosecutor 11,320 135,840 11,893 142,716 12,492 149,904 13,128 157,536 13,789 165,468 1 1 m38 Parks and Trails Director 11,320 135,840 11,893 142,716 12,492 149,904 13,128 157,536 13,789 165,468 1 1 m38 Recreation Director 11,320 135,840 11,893 142,716 12,492 149,904 13,128 157,536 13,789 165,468 2025 CITY OF RENTON SALARY TABLE NON-REPRESENTED Wage Adjustment Revised May November 2025 STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E ELECTED OFFICIALS MANAGEMENT & SUPERVISORY (NON-UNION) Authorized Positions As established by the Independent Salary Commission pursuant to RMC 2-20 As established by the Independent Salary Commission pursuant to RMC 2-20 AGENDA ITEM #2. a) 3.8% Grade Position Title Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual 2025 CITY OF RENTON SALARY TABLE NON-REPRESENTED Wage Adjustment Revised May November 2025 STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E Authorized Positions 1 1 m37 ITS and Maintenance Manager 11,047 132,564 11,603 139,236 12,190 146,280 12,803 153,636 13,454 161,448 1 1 m37 Transportation Design Manager 11,047 132,564 11,603 139,236 12,190 146,280 12,803 153,636 13,454 161,448 1 1 m37 Transportation Operations Manager 11,047 132,564 11,603 139,236 12,190 146,280 12,803 153,636 13,454 161,448 1 1 m37 Transportation Planning Manager 11,047 132,564 11,603 139,236 12,190 146,280 12,803 153,636 13,454 161,448 3 3 m37 Utility Engineering Manager 11,047 132,564 11,603 139,236 12,190 146,280 12,803 153,636 13,454 161,448 1 1 m36 Budget & Accounting Manager 10,775 129,300 11,320 135,840 11,893 142,716 12,492 149,904 13,128 157,536 0 1 1 m36 Business Recruitment and Retention Manager 10,775 129,300 11,320 135,840 11,893 142,716 12,492 149,904 13,128 157,536 1 1 m36 Construction Engineering Manager 10,775 129,300 11,320 135,840 11,893 142,716 12,492 149,904 13,128 157,536 1 1 m36 Current Planning Manager 10,775 129,300 11,320 135,840 11,893 142,716 12,492 149,904 13,128 157,536 1 1 m36 Development Engineering Manager 10,775 129,300 11,320 135,840 11,893 142,716 12,492 149,904 13,128 157,536 1 -1 0 m36 Economic Development Assistant Director 10,775 129,300 11,320 135,840 11,893 142,716 12,492 149,904 13,128 157,536 1 1 m36 Financial Operations Manager 10,775 129,300 11,320 135,840 11,893 142,716 12,492 149,904 13,128 157,536 1 1 m36 Government Affairs Manager 10,775 129,300 11,320 135,840 11,893 142,716 12,492 149,904 13,128 157,536 1 1 m36 Long Range Planning Manager 10,775 129,300 11,320 135,840 11,893 142,716 12,492 149,904 13,128 157,536 1 1 m36 Redevelopment Manager 10,775 129,300 11,320 135,840 11,893 142,716 12,492 149,904 13,128 157,536 1 1 m35 Assistant City Attorney 10,510 126,120 11,047 132,564 11,603 139,236 12,190 146,280 12,803 153,636 1 1 m34 Asset Manager 10,249 122,988 10,775 129,300 11,320 135,840 11,893 142,716 12,492 149,904 0 1 1 m34 Assistant Building Official 10,249 122,988 10,775 129,300 11,320 135,840 11,893 142,716 12,492 149,904 1 1 m34 GIS & Data Manager 10,249 122,988 10,775 129,300 11,320 135,840 11,893 142,716 12,492 149,904 1 1 m34 Human Resources Benefits Manager 10,249 122,988 10,775 129,300 11,320 135,840 11,893 142,716 12,492 149,904 1 1 m34 Organizational Development Manager 10,249 122,988 10,775 129,300 11,320 135,840 11,893 142,716 12,492 149,904 1 1 m34 Risk Manager 10,249 122,988 10,775 129,300 11,320 135,840 11,893 142,716 12,492 149,904 1 1 m33 Sustainability & Solid Waste Manager 10,003 120,036 10,510 126,120 11,047 132,564 11,603 139,236 12,190 146,280 1 1 m33 Water Maintenance Manager 10,003 120,036 10,510 126,120 11,047 132,564 11,603 139,236 12,190 146,280 1 1 m32 Capital Projects Manager 9,758 117,096 10,249 122,988 10,775 129,300 11,320 135,840 11,893 142,716 0 1 1 m32 Code Compliance Manager 9,758 117,096 10,249 122,988 10,775 129,300 11,320 135,840 11,893 142,716 1 1 m32 Economic Development Manager 9,758 117,096 10,249 122,988 10,775 129,300 11,320 135,840 11,893 142,716 1 1 m32 Fleet Manager 9,758 117,096 10,249 122,988 10,775 129,300 11,320 135,840 11,893 142,716 1 1 m32 Human Services Manager 9,758 117,096 10,249 122,988 10,775 129,300 11,320 135,840 11,893 142,716 1 1 m32 Parks Planning & Trails Manager 9,758 117,096 10,249 122,988 10,775 129,300 11,320 135,840 11,893 142,716 1 1 m32 Street Maintenance Manager 9,758 117,096 10,249 122,988 10,775 129,300 11,320 135,840 11,893 142,716 1 1 m32 Urban Forestry and Natural Resources Manager 9,758 117,096 10,249 122,988 10,775 129,300 11,320 135,840 11,893 142,716 1 1 m32 Waste Water/Special Operations Manager 9,758 117,096 10,249 122,988 10,775 129,300 11,320 135,840 11,893 142,716 1 1 m31 Facilities Manager 9,523 114,276 10,003 120,036 10,510 126,120 11,047 132,564 11,603 139,236 1 1 m31 Parks Maintenance Manager 9,523 114,276 10,003 120,036 10,510 126,120 11,047 132,564 11,603 139,236 1 1 m30 Comms & Community Engagement Manager (PD) 9,290 111,480 9,758 117,096 10,249 122,988 10,775 129,300 11,320 135,840 1 1 m30 Police Manager 9,290 111,480 9,758 117,096 10,249 122,988 10,775 129,300 11,320 135,840 1 1 m29 Communications Manager 9,058 108,696 9,523 114,276 10,003 120,036 10,510 126,120 11,047 132,564 1 1 m29 Golf Course Manager 9,058 108,696 9,523 114,276 10,003 120,036 10,510 126,120 11,047 132,564 3 3 m29 Prosecuting Attorney 9,058 108,696 9,523 114,276 10,003 120,036 10,510 126,120 11,047 132,564 1 1 m29 Recreation Manager 9,058 108,696 9,523 114,276 10,003 120,036 10,510 126,120 11,047 132,564 1 1 m28 Permit Services Manager 8,845 106,140 9,290 111,480 9,758 117,096 10,249 122,988 10,775 129,300 1 1 m28 Tax & Licensing Manager 8,845 106,140 9,290 111,480 9,758 117,096 10,249 122,988 10,775 129,300 1 1 m27 Enterprise Content Manager 8,627 103,524 9,058 108,696 9,523 114,276 10,003 120,036 10,510 126,120 1 1 m27 Financial Operations Supervisor 8,627 103,524 9,058 108,696 9,523 114,276 10,003 120,036 10,510 126,120 1 1 m27 Senior Grants Analyst 8,627 103,524 9,058 108,696 9,523 114,276 10,003 120,036 10,510 126,120 1 1 m27 Museum Manager 8,627 103,524 9,058 108,696 9,523 114,276 10,003 120,036 10,510 126,120 1 1 m26 Chief of Staff 8,416 100,992 8,845 106,140 9,290 111,480 9,758 117,096 10,249 122,988 2 2 m25 Court Services Manager 8,212 98,544 8,627 103,524 9,058 108,696 9,523 114,276 10,003 120,036 1 1 m25 Head Golf Professional 8,212 98,544 8,627 103,524 9,058 108,696 9,523 114,276 10,003 120,036 2 2 m25 Senior Benefits Analyst 8,212 98,544 8,627 103,524 9,058 108,696 9,523 114,276 10,003 120,036 2 2 m25 Senior Employee Relations Analyst 8,212 98,544 8,627 103,524 9,058 108,696 9,523 114,276 10,003 120,036 7 7 m25 Senior Finance Analyst 8,212 98,544 8,627 103,524 9,058 108,696 9,523 114,276 10,003 120,036 1 1 m25 Senior Human Resources Analyst - DEI Workforce & Equity 8,212 98,544 8,627 103,524 9,058 108,696 9,523 114,276 10,003 120,036 1 1 m25 Senior Risk Management Analyst 8,212 98,544 8,627 103,524 9,058 108,696 9,523 114,276 10,003 120,036 1 1 m25 Solid Waste Program Manager 8,212 98,544 8,627 103,524 9,058 108,696 9,523 114,276 10,003 120,036 AGENDA ITEM #2. a) 3.8% Grade Position Title Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual 2025 CITY OF RENTON SALARY TABLE NON-REPRESENTED Wage Adjustment Revised May November 2025 STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E Authorized Positions 1 1 m24 Deputy City Clerk/Public Records Officer 8,015 96,180 8,416 100,992 8,845 106,140 9,290 111,480 9,758 117,096 0 0 m23 Benefits Analyst 7,811 93,732 8,212 98,544 8,627 103,524 9,058 108,696 9,523 114,276 1 1 m23 Employee Relations Analyst 7,811 93,732 8,212 98,544 8,627 103,524 9,058 108,696 9,523 114,276 4 4 m23 Recreation Supervisor 7,811 93,732 8,212 98,544 8,627 103,524 9,058 108,696 9,523 114,276 0 0 m23 Risk Management Analyst 7,811 93,732 8,212 98,544 8,627 103,524 9,058 108,696 9,523 114,276 1 1 m22 Community Events Coordinator 7,627 91,524 8,015 96,180 8,416 100,992 8,845 106,140 9,290 111,480 1 1 m22 Community Outreach Coordinator 7,627 91,524 8,015 96,180 8,416 100,992 8,845 106,140 9,290 111,480 1 1 m22 Golf Course Supervisor 7,627 91,524 8,015 96,180 8,416 100,992 8,845 106,140 9,290 111,480 1 1 m22 Parks & Recreation Program Coordinator 7,627 91,524 8,015 96,180 8,416 100,992 8,845 106,140 9,290 111,480 1 1 m21 Executive Assistant 7,438 89,256 7,811 93,732 8,212 98,544 8,627 103,524 9,058 108,696 1 1 m21 Senior Tax & Licensing Auditor 7,438 89,256 7,811 93,732 8,212 98,544 8,627 103,524 9,058 108,696 m20 7,257 87,084 7,627 91,524 8,015 96,180 8,416 100,992 8,845 106,140 m19 7,083 84,996 7,438 89,256 7,811 93,732 8,212 98,544 8,627 103,524 2 2 m18 Payroll Technician 3 6,905 82,860 7,257 87,084 7,627 91,524 8,015 96,180 8,416 100,992 1 1 m17 Legal Analyst 6,742 80,904 7,083 84,996 7,438 89,256 7,811 93,732 8,212 98,544 7 7 n16 Administrative Assistants (All Depts) 6,550 78,600 6,880 82,560 7,217 86,604 7,589 91,068 7,968 95,616 0 0 n16 Finance Analyst 3 6,550 78,600 6,880 82,560 7,217 86,604 7,589 91,068 7,968 95,616 1 1 n16 Tax & Licensing Auditor 2 6,550 78,600 6,880 82,560 7,217 86,604 7,589 91,068 7,968 95,616 n15 6,380 76,560 6,709 80,508 7,046 84,552 7,404 88,848 7,783 93,396 n14 6,229 74,748 6,550 78,600 6,880 82,560 7,217 86,604 7,589 91,068 0 0 n13 Finance Analyst 2 6,075 72,900 6,380 76,560 6,709 80,508 7,046 84,552 7,404 88,848 2 2 n13 Human Resources Specialist 6,075 72,900 6,380 76,560 6,709 80,508 7,046 84,552 7,404 88,848 0 0 n13 Payroll Technician 2 6,075 72,900 6,380 76,560 6,709 80,508 7,046 84,552 7,404 88,848 0 0 n13 Tax & Licensing Auditor 1 6,075 72,900 6,380 76,560 6,709 80,508 7,046 84,552 7,404 88,848 n12 5,933 71,196 6,229 74,748 6,550 78,600 6,880 82,560 7,217 86,604 1 1 n11 Assistant Golf Professional 5,784 69,408 6,075 72,900 6,380 76,560 6,709 80,508 7,046 84,552 0 0 n10 Finance Analyst 1 5,645 67,740 5,933 71,196 6,229 74,748 6,550 78,600 6,880 82,560 0 0 n10 Payroll Technician 1 5,645 67,740 5,933 71,196 6,229 74,748 6,550 78,600 6,880 82,560 n09 5,511 66,132 5,784 69,408 6,075 72,900 6,380 76,560 6,709 80,508 n08 5,372 64,464 5,645 67,740 5,933 71,196 6,229 74,748 6,550 78,600 n07 5,242 62,904 5,511 66,132 5,784 69,408 6,075 72,900 6,380 76,560 n06 5,112 61,344 5,372 64,464 5,645 67,740 5,933 71,196 6,229 74,748 n05 4,989 59,868 5,242 62,904 5,511 66,132 5,784 69,408 6,075 72,900 n04 4,869 58,428 5,112 61,344 5,372 64,464 5,645 67,740 5,933 71,196 n03 4,755 57,060 4,989 59,868 5,242 62,904 5,511 66,132 5,784 69,408 n02 4,639 55,668 4,869 58,428 5,112 61,344 5,372 64,464 5,645 67,740 1 1 n01 Office Specialist 4,532 54,384 4,755 57,060 4,989 59,868 5,242 62,904 5,511 66,132 NON-UNION (CLERICAL, OTHER) AGENDA ITEM #2. a) 3.8% Grade Position Title Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual 2025 CITY OF RENTON SALARY TABLE NON-REPRESENTED Wage Adjustment Revised May November 2025 STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E Authorized Positions 145 3148 $7,524 Completion of 5 Yrs Completion of 10 Yrs Completion of 15 Yrs Completion of 20 Yrs Completion of 25 Yrs Completion of 30 Yrs (1) In addition to salary receives annual car allowance of $4800 or use of a city vehicle. Not eligible for longevity. (2) (3) Eligible for Longevity at the Non-Represented Longevity pay scale. Not eligible for Education or Uniform Allowance. (4) Eligible for Longevity at the Non-Represented Longevity pay scale and Education Premium. Not eligible for Uniform Allowance. Eligible for 3% cash premium or 3% into deferred compensation per employee's discretion for passing physical fitness. (5)Receive Education/Longevity & Uniform Allowance based on Union Contract. Eligible for 3% deferred compensation for passing physical fitness. Eligible for P2 paid job injury leave based on Union Contract. (6) 4 year term. Not eligible for longevity. (7) Council president to be paid $300/month above council members salary. 2% Step a14E $150 per month NON-REPRESENTED LONGEVITY PAY The city contributes 4% of employee's base wage per year to a deferred compensation account Step a14, E = 3% Step a14E $226 per month 4% Step a14E $301 per month for Management and Non-Represented employees; except for CAO receives 11% per year. 5% Step a14E $376 per month 6% Step a14E $451 per month 7% Step a14E $527 per month Council members salary set per Independent Salary Commission pursuant to Chapter 2-20 RMC. Council receives 2% of salary for deferred comp. If members are prohibited from participating in PERS, they receive an extra 1.4 % of salary for deferred compensation. Not eligible for longevity. AGENDA ITEM #2. a) Wage Adjustment 3.8% Revised 8/xx/202 Grade Position Title Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual a40 11,711 140,532 12,295 147,540 12,919 155,028 13,575 162,900 14,260 171,120 a39 11,445 137,340 12,013 144,156 12,602 151,224 13,243 158,916 13,913 166,956 a38 11,153 133,836 11,711 140,532 12,295 147,540 12,919 155,028 13,575 162,900 5 5 a37 Principal Civil Engineer 10,897 130,764 11,445 137,340 12,013 144,156 12,602 151,224 13,243 158,916 a36 10,621 127,452 11,153 133,836 11,711 140,532 12,295 147,540 12,919 155,028 a35 10,367 124,404 10,897 130,764 11,445 137,340 12,013 144,156 12,602 151,224 1 1 a34 Structural Plans Examiner 10,113 121,356 10,621 127,452 11,153 133,836 11,711 140,532 12,295 147,540 19 19 a33 Civil Engineer 3 9,869 118,428 10,367 124,404 10,897 130,764 11,445 137,340 12,013 144,156 11a32Assistant Airport Manager Airport Operations Manager 9,631 115,572 10,113 121,356 10,621 127,452 11,153 133,836 11,711 140,532 2 2 a32 Principal Planner 9,631 115,572 10,113 121,356 10,621 127,452 11,153 133,836 11,711 140,532 1 1 a31 Client Technology Sys & Support Super 9,388 112,656 9,869 118,428 10,367 124,404 10,897 130,764 11,445 137,340 5 5 a30 Civil Engineer 2 9,163 109,956 9,631 115,572 10,113 121,356 10,621 127,452 11,153 133,836 2 2 a30 Senior Systems Analyst 9,163 109,956 9,631 115,572 10,113 121,356 10,621 127,452 11,153 133,836 4 4 a29 Capital Projects Coordinator 8,940 107,280 9,388 112,656 9,869 118,428 10,367 124,404 10,897 130,764 1 1 a29 ITS & Signal Maintenance Supervisor 8,940 107,280 9,388 112,656 9,869 118,428 10,367 124,404 10,897 130,764 1 1 a29 Network & Security Engineer 2 8,940 107,280 9,388 112,656 9,869 118,428 10,367 124,404 10,897 130,764 1 1 a29 Program Development Coordinator 2 8,940 107,280 9,388 112,656 9,869 118,428 10,367 124,404 10,897 130,764 2 2 a29 Senior Network Systems Specialist 8,940 107,280 9,388 112,656 9,869 118,428 10,367 124,404 10,897 130,764 2 2 a29 Senior Planner 8,940 107,280 9,388 112,656 9,869 118,428 10,367 124,404 10,897 130,764 4 4 a28 Senior Business Systems Analyst 8,719 104,628 9,163 109,956 9,631 115,572 10,113 121,356 10,621 127,452 1 1 a28 Transportation Planner 8,719 104,628 9,163 109,956 9,631 115,572 10,113 121,356 10,621 127,452 1 1 a28 Water Treatment Operations Supervisor 8,719 104,628 9,163 109,956 9,631 115,572 10,113 121,356 10,621 127,452 6 6 a27 GIS Analyst 3 8,508 102,096 8,940 107,280 9,388 112,656 9,869 118,428 10,367 124,404 0 0 a27 Systems Analyst 8,508 102,096 8,940 107,280 9,388 112,656 9,869 118,428 10,367 124,404 0 0 a26 Civil Engineer 1 8,298 99,576 8,719 104,628 9,163 109,956 9,631 115,572 10,113 121,356 1 1 a26 Facilities Coordinator 8,298 99,576 8,719 104,628 9,163 109,956 9,631 115,572 10,113 121,356 1 1 a26 Lead Building Inspector 8,298 99,576 8,719 104,628 9,163 109,956 9,631 115,572 10,113 121,356 1 1 a26 Lead Code Compliance Inspector 8,298 99,576 8,719 104,628 9,163 109,956 9,631 115,572 10,113 121,356 1 1 a26 Lead Construction Engineering Inspector 8,298 99,576 8,719 104,628 9,163 109,956 9,631 115,572 10,113 121,356 1 1 a26 Lead Electrical/Ctrl Systems Technician 8,298 99,576 8,719 104,628 9,163 109,956 9,631 115,572 10,113 121,356 1 1 a26 Neighborhood Program Coordinator 8,298 99,576 8,719 104,628 9,163 109,956 9,631 115,572 10,113 121,356 0 0 a26 Program Development Coordinator 1 8,298 99,576 8,719 104,628 9,163 109,956 9,631 115,572 10,113 121,356 0 0 a25 Network & Security Engineer 1 8,096 97,152 8,508 102,096 8,940 107,280 9,388 112,656 9,869 118,428 1 1 a25 Network Systems Specialist 8,096 97,152 8,508 102,096 8,940 107,280 9,388 112,656 9,869 118,428 1 1 a25 Senior Economic Development Specialist 8,096 97,152 8,508 102,096 8,940 107,280 9,388 112,656 9,869 118,428 1 1 a24 Airport Ops & Maintenance Supervisor 7,901 94,812 8,298 99,576 8,719 104,628 9,163 109,956 9,631 115,572 2 2 a24 Building Plan Reviewer 7,901 94,812 8,298 99,576 8,719 104,628 9,163 109,956 9,631 115,572 0 0 a24 Business Systems Analyst 7,901 94,812 8,298 99,576 8,719 104,628 9,163 109,956 9,631 115,572 6 6 a24 Engineering Specialist 3 7,901 94,812 8,298 99,576 8,719 104,628 9,163 109,956 9,631 115,572 1 1 a24 GIS Analyst 2 7,901 94,812 8,298 99,576 8,719 104,628 9,163 109,956 9,631 115,572 1 1 a24 Property Services Specialist 7,901 94,812 8,298 99,576 8,719 104,628 9,163 109,956 9,631 115,572 1 1 a24 Street Maintenance Services Supervisor 7,901 94,812 8,298 99,576 8,719 104,628 9,163 109,956 9,631 115,572 2 2 a24 Waste Water Maint. Services Supervisor 7,901 94,812 8,298 99,576 8,719 104,628 9,163 109,956 9,631 115,572 1 1 a24 Water Maintenance Services Supervisor 7,901 94,812 8,298 99,576 8,719 104,628 9,163 109,956 9,631 115,572 Revised FTE STEP D STEP E Effective 1/1/2025 (revised July 2025) Revised November 2025 2025 CITY OF RENTON SALARY TABLE STEP A STEP B STEP C Authorized Positions AFSCME, Local 2170 Current FTE Addition/ Removal AGENDA ITEM #2. a) Wage Adjustment 3.8% Revised 8/xx/202 Grade Position Title Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Revised FTE STEP D STEP E Effective 1/1/2025 (revised July 2025) Revised November 2025 2025 CITY OF RENTON SALARY TABLE STEP A STEP B STEP C Authorized Positions AFSCME, Local 2170 Current FTE Addition/ Removal 1 1 a23 Client Technology Services Specialist 3 7,710 92,520 8,096 97,152 8,508 102,096 8,940 107,280 9,388 112,656 2 2 a23 Custodial Maintenance Supervisor 7,710 92,520 8,096 97,152 8,508 102,096 8,940 107,280 9,388 112,656 1 1 a23 Data Analyst 7,710 92,520 8,096 97,152 8,508 102,096 8,940 107,280 9,388 112,656 2 2 a23 Emergency Management Coordinator 7,710 92,520 8,096 97,152 8,508 102,096 8,940 107,280 9,388 112,656 1 1 a23 Facilities Supervisor 7,710 92,520 8,096 97,152 8,508 102,096 8,940 107,280 9,388 112,656 1 1 a23 Housing Repair Coordinator 7,710 92,520 8,096 97,152 8,508 102,096 8,940 107,280 9,388 112,656 1 1 a23 Pavement Management Technician 7,710 92,520 8,096 97,152 8,508 102,096 8,940 107,280 9,388 112,656 0 0 a23 Plan Reviewer 7,710 92,520 8,096 97,152 8,508 102,096 8,940 107,280 9,388 112,656 0 0 a23 Senior Paralegal 7,710 92,520 8,096 97,152 8,508 102,096 8,940 107,280 9,388 112,656 4 4 a23 Signal & ITS Technician 3 7,710 92,520 8,096 97,152 8,508 102,096 8,940 107,280 9,388 112,656 1 1 a23 Utility Accounts Supervisor 7,710 92,520 8,096 97,152 8,508 102,096 8,940 107,280 9,388 112,656 6 6 a22 Associate Planner 7,524 90,288 7,901 94,812 8,298 99,576 8,719 104,628 9,163 109,956 2 2 a22 Building Inspector/Combination 7,524 90,288 7,901 94,812 8,298 99,576 8,719 104,628 9,163 109,956 3 3 a22 Building Inspector/Electrical 7,524 90,288 7,901 94,812 8,298 99,576 8,719 104,628 9,163 109,956 2 2 a22 Case Manager 7,524 90,288 7,901 94,812 8,298 99,576 8,719 104,628 9,163 109,956 4 4 a22 Code Compliance Inspector 7,524 90,288 7,901 94,812 8,298 99,576 8,719 104,628 9,163 109,956 1 1 a22 Communications Specialist 2 7,524 90,288 7,901 94,812 8,298 99,576 8,719 104,628 9,163 109,956 7 7 a22 Construction Engineering Inspector 7,524 90,288 7,901 94,812 8,298 99,576 8,719 104,628 9,163 109,956 0 0 a22 GIS Analyst 1 7,524 90,288 7,901 94,812 8,298 99,576 8,719 104,628 9,163 109,956 2 2 a22 Parks Maintenance Supervisor 7,524 90,288 7,901 94,812 8,298 99,576 8,719 104,628 9,163 109,956 1 1 a22 Water Meter Tech. Services Supervisor 7,524 90,288 7,901 94,812 8,298 99,576 8,719 104,628 9,163 109,956 1 1 a21 Business Coordinator - Airport 7,335 88,020 7,710 92,520 8,096 97,152 8,508 102,096 8,940 107,280 1 1 a21 Human Services Coordinator 7,335 88,020 7,710 92,520 8,096 97,152 8,508 102,096 8,940 107,280 1 1 a21 Lead Vehicle & Equipment Mechanic 7,335 88,020 7,710 92,520 8,096 97,152 8,508 102,096 8,940 107,280 1 1 a21 Public Records Analyst 7,335 88,020 7,710 92,520 8,096 97,152 8,508 102,096 8,940 107,280 1 1 a21 Traffic Signage & Marking Supervisor 7,335 88,020 7,710 92,520 8,096 97,152 8,508 102,096 8,940 107,280 1 1 a21 SCADA/Telemetry Technician 7,335 88,020 7,710 92,520 8,096 97,152 8,508 102,096 8,940 107,280 1 1 a20 Client Technology Services Specialist 2 7,156 85,872 7,524 90,288 7,901 94,812 8,298 99,576 8,719 104,628 1 1 a20 Economic Development Specialist 7,156 85,872 7,524 90,288 7,901 94,812 8,298 99,576 8,719 104,628 1 1 a20 Engineering Specialist 2 7,156 85,872 7,524 90,288 7,901 94,812 8,298 99,576 8,719 104,628 1 1 a20 Enterprise Content Specialist 2 7,156 85,872 7,524 90,288 7,901 94,812 8,298 99,576 8,719 104,628 1 1 a20 Inspecting Arborist 7,156 85,872 7,524 90,288 7,901 94,812 8,298 99,576 8,719 104,628 1 1 a20 Senior Program Specialist 7,156 85,872 7,524 90,288 7,901 94,812 8,298 99,576 8,719 104,628 1 1 a19 Electrical Technician 6,981 83,772 7,335 88,020 7,710 92,520 8,096 97,152 8,508 102,096 1 1 a19 Encampment Clean-Up Lead 6,981 83,772 7,335 88,020 7,710 92,520 8,096 97,152 8,508 102,096 1 1 a19 Farmers Market Coordinator 6,981 83,772 7,335 88,020 7,710 92,520 8,096 97,152 8,508 102,096 1 1 a19 HVAC Systems Technician 6,981 83,772 7,335 88,020 7,710 92,520 8,096 97,152 8,508 102,096 7 7 a19 Recreation Program Coordinator 6,981 83,772 7,335 88,020 7,710 92,520 8,096 97,152 8,508 102,096 3 3 a19 Senior Sustainability Specialist 6,981 83,772 7,335 88,020 7,710 92,520 8,096 97,152 8,508 102,096 0 0 a19 Signal & ITS Technician 2 6,981 83,772 7,335 88,020 7,710 92,520 8,096 97,152 8,508 102,096 4 4 a19 Water Treatment Plant Operator 6,981 83,772 7,335 88,020 7,710 92,520 8,096 97,152 8,508 102,096 1 1 a18 Assistant Planner 6,817 81,804 7,156 85,872 7,524 90,288 7,901 94,812 8,298 99,576 0 0 a18 Development Services Representative 6,817 81,804 7,156 85,872 7,524 90,288 7,901 94,812 8,298 99,576 1 1 a18 Lead Golf Course Maintenance Worker 6,817 81,804 7,156 85,872 7,524 90,288 7,901 94,812 8,298 99,576 7 7 a18 Lead Maintenance Services Worker 6,817 81,804 7,156 85,872 7,524 90,288 7,901 94,812 8,298 99,576 2 2 a18 Lead Parks Maintenance Worker 6,817 81,804 7,156 85,872 7,524 90,288 7,901 94,812 8,298 99,576 1 1 a18 Maintenance Buyer 6,817 81,804 7,156 85,872 7,524 90,288 7,901 94,812 8,298 99,576 4 4 a18 Paralegal 6,817 81,804 7,156 85,872 7,524 90,288 7,901 94,812 8,298 99,576 1 1 a18 Water Utility Maintenance Technician 6,817 81,804 7,156 85,872 7,524 90,288 7,901 94,812 8,298 99,576 1 1 a17 Digital Communications Specialist 6,646 79,752 6,981 83,772 7,335 88,020 7,710 92,520 8,096 97,152 2 2 a17 Lift Station Technician 6,646 79,752 6,981 83,772 7,335 88,020 7,710 92,520 8,096 97,152 0.75 0.75 a17 Program Assistant 6,646 79,752 6,981 83,772 7,335 88,020 7,710 92,520 8,096 97,152 1 1 a17 Public Records Specialist 6,646 79,752 6,981 83,772 7,335 88,020 7,710 92,520 8,096 97,152 1 1 a17 Senior Traffic Maintenance Worker 6,646 79,752 6,981 83,772 7,335 88,020 7,710 92,520 8,096 97,152 0.5 0.5 a17 Sustainability Specialist 6,646 79,752 6,981 83,772 7,335 88,020 7,710 92,520 8,096 97,152 0 0 a17 Water Treatment Plant Operator Trainee 6,646 79,752 6,981 83,772 7,335 88,020 7,710 92,520 8,096 97,152 AGENDA ITEM #2. a) Wage Adjustment 3.8% Revised 8/xx/202 Grade Position Title Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Revised FTE STEP D STEP E Effective 1/1/2025 (revised July 2025) Revised November 2025 2025 CITY OF RENTON SALARY TABLE STEP A STEP B STEP C Authorized Positions AFSCME, Local 2170 Current FTE Addition/ Removal 2 2 a16 City Clerk Specialist 2 6,491 77,892 6,817 81,804 7,156 85,872 7,524 90,288 7,901 94,812 2 2 a16 Client Technology Services Specialist 1 6,491 77,892 6,817 81,804 7,156 85,872 7,524 90,288 7,901 94,812 1 1 a16 Court Operations Specialist 6,491 77,892 6,817 81,804 7,156 85,872 7,524 90,288 7,901 94,812 0 0 a16 Enterprise Content Specialist 1 6,491 77,892 6,817 81,804 7,156 85,872 7,524 90,288 7,901 94,812 2 2 a16 Facilities Technician 2 6,491 77,892 6,817 81,804 7,156 85,872 7,524 90,288 7,901 94,812 0.75 0.75 a16 Recreation Specialist 6,491 77,892 6,817 81,804 7,156 85,872 7,524 90,288 7,901 94,812 5 5 a16 Vehicle & Equipment Mechanic 2 6,491 77,892 6,817 81,804 7,156 85,872 7,524 90,288 7,901 94,812 1 1 a15 Airport Operations Specialist 6,323 75,876 6,646 79,752 6,981 83,772 7,335 88,020 7,710 92,520 1 1 a15 Asset Management Systems Technician 6,323 75,876 6,646 79,752 6,981 83,772 7,335 88,020 7,710 92,520 1 1 a15 Communications Specialist 1 6,323 75,876 6,646 79,752 6,981 83,772 7,335 88,020 7,710 92,520 1 1 a15 Grounds Equipment Mechanic 6,323 75,876 6,646 79,752 6,981 83,772 7,335 88,020 7,710 92,520 1 1 a15 Housing Maintenance Technician 6,323 75,876 6,646 79,752 6,981 83,772 7,335 88,020 7,710 92,520 4 4 a15 Planning Technician 6,323 75,876 6,646 79,752 6,981 83,772 7,335 88,020 7,710 92,520 1 1 a15 Signal & ITS Technician 1 6,323 75,876 6,646 79,752 6,981 83,772 7,335 88,020 7,710 92,520 0 1 1 a14 Engineering Specialist 1 6,174 74,088 6,491 77,892 6,817 81,804 7,156 85,872 7,524 90,288 4 4 a14 Facilities Technician 1 6,174 74,088 6,491 77,892 6,817 81,804 7,156 85,872 7,524 90,288 1 1 a14 Golf Course Maintenance Worker 3 6,174 74,088 6,491 77,892 6,817 81,804 7,156 85,872 7,524 90,288 26 26 a14 Maintenance Services Worker 3 6,174 74,088 6,491 77,892 6,817 81,804 7,156 85,872 7,524 90,288 12 12 a14 Parks Maintenance Worker 3 6,174 74,088 6,491 77,892 6,817 81,804 7,156 85,872 7,524 90,288 3 3 a14 Permit Services Specialist 6,174 74,088 6,491 77,892 6,817 81,804 7,156 85,872 7,524 90,288 1 1 a14 Print & Mail Supervisor 6,174 74,088 6,491 77,892 6,817 81,804 7,156 85,872 7,524 90,288 0 0 a14 Program Specialist 6,174 74,088 6,491 77,892 6,817 81,804 7,156 85,872 7,524 90,288 1 1 a14 Recreation Systems Technician 6,174 74,088 6,491 77,892 6,817 81,804 7,156 85,872 7,524 90,288 3 3 a14 Traffic Maintenance Worker 2 6,174 74,088 6,491 77,892 6,817 81,804 7,156 85,872 7,524 90,288 3 3 a13 Judicial Specialist 2 6,021 72,252 6,323 75,876 6,646 79,752 6,981 83,772 7,335 88,020 3 3 a12 Airport Maintenance Worker 5,878 70,536 6,174 74,088 6,491 77,892 6,817 81,804 7,156 85,872 0 0 a12 City Clerk Specialist 1 5,878 70,536 6,174 74,088 6,491 77,892 6,817 81,804 7,156 85,872 00a12Vehicle & Equipment Mechanic 1 5,878 70,536 6,174 74,088 6,491 77,892 6,817 81,804 7,156 85,872 1 1 a12 Water Meter System Specialist 5,878 70,536 6,174 74,088 6,491 77,892 6,817 81,804 7,156 85,872 2 2 a11 Encampment Clean-Up Worker 5,733 68,796 6,021 72,252 6,323 75,876 6,646 79,752 6,981 83,772 1 1 a11 Fleet Management Technician 5,733 68,796 6,021 72,252 6,323 75,876 6,646 79,752 6,981 83,772 1 1 a11 IT Procurement & Contract Coordinator 5,733 68,796 6,021 72,252 6,323 75,876 6,646 79,752 6,981 83,772 2 2 a11 Lead Maintenance Custodian 5,733 68,796 6,021 72,252 6,323 75,876 6,646 79,752 6,981 83,772 2 2 a11 Legal Assistant 5,733 68,796 6,021 72,252 6,323 75,876 6,646 79,752 6,981 83,772 7 7 a10 Accounting Assistant 4 5,593 67,116 5,878 70,536 6,174 74,088 6,491 77,892 6,817 81,804 15 -1 14 a10 Administrative Secretary 1 5,593 67,116 5,878 70,536 6,174 74,088 6,491 77,892 6,817 81,804 1 1 a10 Golf Course Maintenance Worker 2 5,593 67,116 5,878 70,536 6,174 74,088 6,491 77,892 6,817 81,804 1 1 a10 Golf Course Operations Assistant 5,593 67,116 5,878 70,536 6,174 74,088 6,491 77,892 6,817 81,804 23 23 a10 Maintenance Services Worker 2 5,593 67,116 5,878 70,536 6,174 74,088 6,491 77,892 6,817 81,804 6 6 a10 Parks Maintenance Worker 2 5,593 67,116 5,878 70,536 6,174 74,088 6,491 77,892 6,817 81,804 3 3 a10 Recreation Assistant 5,593 67,116 5,878 70,536 6,174 74,088 6,491 77,892 6,817 81,804 0 0 a10 Traffic Maintenance Worker 1 5,593 67,116 5,878 70,536 6,174 74,088 6,491 77,892 6,817 81,804 5 5 a09 Judicial Specialist 1 5,456 65,472 5,733 68,796 6,021 72,252 6,323 75,876 6,646 79,752 1 1 a09 Purchasing Assistant 5,456 65,472 5,733 68,796 6,021 72,252 6,323 75,876 6,646 79,752 1 1 a08 Accounting Assistant 3 5,324 63,888 5,593 67,116 5,878 70,536 6,174 74,088 6,491 77,892 1 1 a08 Court Security Officer 5,324 63,888 5,593 67,116 5,878 70,536 6,174 74,088 6,491 77,892 3 3 a08 Maintenance Custodian 5,324 63,888 5,593 67,116 5,878 70,536 6,174 74,088 6,491 77,892 2 2 a08 Secretary 2 5,324 63,888 5,593 67,116 5,878 70,536 6,174 74,088 6,491 77,892 2 2 a08 Water Meter Technician 5,324 63,888 5,593 67,116 5,878 70,536 6,174 74,088 6,491 77,892 4 4 a07 Maintenance Services Worker 1 5,195 62,340 5,456 65,472 5,733 68,796 6,021 72,252 6,323 75,876 AGENDA ITEM #2. a) Wage Adjustment 3.8% Revised 8/xx/202 Grade Position Title Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Revised FTE STEP D STEP E Effective 1/1/2025 (revised July 2025) Revised November 2025 2025 CITY OF RENTON SALARY TABLE STEP A STEP B STEP C Authorized Positions AFSCME, Local 2170 Current FTE Addition/ Removal 0 0 a06 Accounting Assistant 2 5,073 60,876 5,324 63,888 5,593 67,116 5,878 70,536 6,174 74,088 0 0 a06 Golf Course Maintenance Worker 1 5,073 60,876 5,324 63,888 5,593 67,116 5,878 70,536 6,174 74,088 2 2 a06 Parks Maintenance Worker 1 5,073 60,876 5,324 63,888 5,593 67,116 5,878 70,536 6,174 74,088 a05 4,946 59,352 5,195 62,340 5,456 65,472 5,733 68,796 6,021 72,252 0 0 a04 Accounting Assistant 1 4,828 57,936 5,073 60,876 5,324 63,888 5,593 67,116 5,878 70,536 6 6 a04 Parks Maintenance Assistant 4,828 57,936 5,073 60,876 5,324 63,888 5,593 67,116 5,878 70,536 1 1 a04 Print & Mail Assistant 4,828 57,936 5,073 60,876 5,324 63,888 5,593 67,116 5,878 70,536 2 2 a04 Pro Shop Assistant 4,828 57,936 5,073 60,876 5,324 63,888 5,593 67,116 5,878 70,536 1 1 a03 Golf Course Associate 4,709 56,508 4,946 59,352 5,195 62,340 5,456 65,472 5,733 68,796 13 13 a02 Custodian 4,604 55,248 4,828 57,936 5,073 60,876 5,324 63,888 5,593 67,116 a01 4,483 53,796 4,709 56,508 4,946 59,352 5,195 62,340 5,456 65,472 366 0 366 $7,524 Completion of 5 Yrs Completion of 10 Yrs Completion of 15 Yrs Completion of 20 Yrs Completion of 25 Yrs Completion of 30 Yrs 5% Step a14E $376 3% Step a14E $226 per month 4% Step a14E $301 per month per month 2% Step a14E $150 per month Step a14, E = LONGEVITY PAY - The city contributes 1% of employee's base wage per year to a VEBA account. (Article 12.3 of AFSCME CBA) - The city contributes 3% of employee's base wage per year to a deferred compensation account. (Article 14 of Agreement By and Between City of Renton and Local 2170, Washington State Council of County and City Employees, American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees) 6% Step a14E $451 per month 7% Step a14E $527 per month AGENDA ITEM #2. a) 4.0% Grade Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Police Chief Police Deputy Chief Police Commander 17 17 pc61 Sergeant*11,858 142,299 12,807 153,684 (15% over Police Officer 2)*Step increase at 12 months 111 111 pc60 8,357 100,288 9,016 108,192 9,661 115,938 10,313 123,755 pc59 7,866 94,398 8,485 101,821 9,093 109,114 9,705 116,466 128 0 128 Percent Interpreters -----------------------------3% Detectives -------------------------------3% Traffic Assignment---------------------3% Motorcycle Assignment------------------- 2% Background Investigator--------------- 3% Canine Officer --------------------------4% Corporal Assignment -----------------7.5% Field Training Officer -----------------3% 8% when assigned student(s) Training Officer-------------------------3% SWAT Assignment -------------------- 4% SRO Assignment------------------------3% Civil Disturbance Paid at rate of double time with 3 hrs Unit ---------------------------------------minimum when called to an emergency. Special Weapons and Tactics------------------------------ Negotiator--------------------------------4% SET/DET-----------------------------------3% VIIT-----------------------------------------2%* VIIT Lead------------------------------------- 4%* STEP D STEP E Authorized 2025 CITY OF RENTON SALARY TABLE Wage AdjustmentEffective January 1 2025 POLICE DEPARTMENT - Commissioned Officers STEP A STEP B STEP CCurren t FTE Addition /Remov Revised FTE Paid at rate of time and one half with a *In addition to a paid rate of time and one half with 3 hr minimum when called out. Position Title HAZARD DUTY AND PREMIUM PAY (Article 6.7 and 6.8) Frozen Frozen ( Schedule) (6.25% over Police Officer 1) minimum when called to an Police Officer 1 (Newly Hired 2080 Hours) See Management & Supervisory Matrix, Grade m52 See Management & Supervisory Matrix, Grade m48 See Management & Supervisory Matrix, Grade m42 AGENDA ITEM #2. a) Percentage (of base wage) Percentage (of base wage) - - - 6% The city contributes 1% of employee's wage base toward deferred compensation. (Appendix A.2.2 of Agreement By and Between City of Renton and Renton Police Guild Representing Commissioned Employees (January 1, 2024- December 31, 2026) (Commissioned Guild CBA)) BA Degree/Masters Degree AA Degree (90 credits) MONTHLY LONGEVITY PAY (Appendix B) Years of Service Completion of 5 Yrs 2% NOTE: Please refer to the current labor agreement for specific information. Completion of 10 Yrs 4% Completion of 15 Yrs 6% Completion of 20 Yrs 10% Completion of 25 Yrs 12% Completion of 30 Yrs 14% MONTHLY EDUCATIONAL INCENTIVE PAY (Appendix B) 4% The city contributes 3% of employee's wage base toward deferred compensation for passing physical fitness. (Article 6.8.4, and Appendix A.2.3 of Commissioned Guild CBA) Effective January 1, 2025, the city contributes 3% of employee's wage base to a VEBA plan. (Article 14.10 of Commissioned Guild CBA) AGENDA ITEM #2. a) 4.0% Grade Position Title Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual pn70 7,376 88,512 7,974 95,688 8,762 105,144 9,628 115,536 10,135 121,620 pn69 7,195 86,340 7,778 93,336 8,548 102,576 9,394 112,728 9,887 118,644 pn68 7,020 84,240 7,590 91,080 8,340 100,080 9,164 109,968 9,647 115,764 33pn67Community Engagement Coord.6,849 82,188 7,405 88,860 8,137 97,644 8,940 107,280 9,411 112,932 pn66 6,681 80,172 7,224 86,688 7,937 95,244 8,722 104,664 9,180 110,160 pn65 6,518 78,216 7,047 84,564 7,745 92,940 8,510 102,120 8,958 107,496 11pn64Crime Analyst 6,498 77,976 7,021 84,252 7,713 92,556 8,315 99,780 8,731 104,772 pn63 6,205 74,460 6,708 80,496 7,369 88,428 8,100 97,200 8,526 102,312 2 2 pn62 Police Services Specialist 8,556 102,672 (15% above Specialist, Step E) 2 2 pn61 Electronic Home Detention 6,048 72,576 6,526 78,312 7,186 86,232 7,901 94,812 8,294 99,528 pn60 6,130 73,560 6,624 79,488 7,276 87,312 7,844 94,128 8,237 98,844 1 1 pn59 Domestic Violence Victim 5,722 68,664 6,216 74,592 6,907 82,884 7,594 91,128 7,996 95,952 3 3 pn58 Evidence Technician 5,770 69,240 6,228 74,736 6,854 82,248 7,539 90,468 7,928 95,136 1 1 pn57 Police Services Specialist Lead 7,998 95,976 (7.5% above Specialist, Step E) 2 2 pn56 Animal Control Officer 5,441 65,292 5,883 70,596 6,469 77,628 7,114 85,368 7,471 89,652 16 16 pn54 Police Services Specialist 5,419 65,028 5,854 70,248 6,444 77,328 7,088 85,056 7,440 89,280 3 3 pn53 Police Administrative Specialist 4,851 58,212 5,245 62,940 5,766 69,192 6,343 76,116 6,655 79,860 2 2 pn52 Parking Enforcement Officer 4,700 56,400 5,072 60,864 5,587 67,044 6,146 73,752 6,449 77,388 36 0 36 Interpreter Premium…………...……………………..…………….................….....…3% of base pay (Article 6.5.2) 4% of base pay (Article 6.5.3) 4% of base pay (Article 6.5.1) Double time with 3 hrs min (Article 6.4) 2025 CITY OF RENTON SALARY TABLE POLICE DEPARTMENT - Non-Commissioned Employees Curren t FTE Addition /Remov Revised FTE Effective January 1, 2025 STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E Wage Adjustment Authorized NON-COMMISSIONED PREMIUM PAY (Articles 6.4 and 6.5) Public Records Act Premium……..…………………………………...............……… Field Training Officer, FTO (Police Service Specialist)…...............………… Crisis Communication Unit………..........…………………………..............……… AGENDA ITEM #2. a) 4.0% 2025 CITY OF RENTON SALARY TABLE POLICE DEPARTMENT - Non-Commissioned Employees Effective January 1, 2025 Wage Adjustment Completion of 5 Yrs 2% POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED - MONTHLY LONGEVITY INCENTIVE PAY SCHEDULE (Article 12, Appendix B.1) Years of Service ercentage (of base wage 4% Completion of 15 Yrs 6% Completion of 20 Yrs 10% Completion of 10 Yrs Completion of 25 Yrs 12% Completion of 30 Yrs 14% MONTHLY EDUCATIONAL INCENTIVE PAY SCHEDULE (Appendix B.2) Percentage (of base wage) AA Degree (90 credits) 4% BA/BS Degree or Masters Degree 6% - The city contributes 3.5% of the employee's base wage to a deferred comp account. (Appendix A.3 of Non- Commissioned Guild CBA) - The city contributes an additional 3% of employee's wage base toward deferred comp for passing physical fitness. - The city contributes 2% of the employee's base wage to a VEBA plan. (Article 14.10 of Agreement By and Between City of Renton and Non-Commissioned Employees of the Renton Police Guild (2024- 2026) (Non-Commissioned Guild CBA)) AGENDA ITEM #2. a) Grade h50 20.90 h51 21.00 h52 22.00 h53 23.00 h54 24.00 h55 25.00 h56 26.00 h57 27.00 h58 28.00 h59 29.00 h60 30.00 h61 31.00 h62 32.00 h63 33.00 h64 34.00 h65 35.00 h66 40.00 h67 45.00 h68 50.00 h69 55.00 h70 60.00 h71 65.00 h72 70.00 h73 75.00 h74 80.00 h75 85.00 h76 90.00 h77 95.00 h78 100.00 2025 CITY OF SUPPLEMENTAL WAGE TABLE AGENDA ITEM #2. a) ORDINANCE NO. ________ 10 Exhibit D: 2026 Salary Table AGENDA ITEM #2. a) $0 $0 2.7% Grade Position Title Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual 2025 FTE Addition/ Removal 2026 FTE 1 1 E10 Mayor (1) 20,968 251,615 1 1 E09 City Council President (2)(7) 6 6 E09 City Council Members (2) 2 2 E11 Municipal Court Judge (6) to RMC 3-10-2.E E2 17,364 208,369 18,088 217,051 18,841 226,095 19,626 235,515 20,444 245,328 21,296 255,550 22,183 266,198 23,108 277,290 1 1 Chief Administrative Officer E1 15,756 189,075 16,413 196,954 17,097 205,160 17,809 213,708 18,551 222,613 19,324 231,888 20,129 241,550 20,968 251,615 1 1 City Attorney 1 1 Parks & Recreation Administrator 1 1 Community & Economic Development Administrator 1 1 Deputy Chief Administrative Officer 1 1 Finance Administrator 1 1 Human Resources & Risk Mgmt Administrator 1 1 Public Works Administrator P3 16,399 196,793 17,083 204,993 17,795 213,534 18,536 222,431 19,308 231,699 20,113 241,353 20,951 251,410 21,824 261,885 1 1 Police Chief (3) P2 14,792 177,499 15,408 184,895 16,050 192,599 16,719 200,624 17,415 208,983 18,141 217,691 18,897 226,762 19,684 236,210 2 2 Police Deputy Chief (4) P1 11,898 142,771 12,393 148,720 12,910 154,917 13,448 161,372 14,008 168,095 14,592 175,099 15,200 182,395 15,833 189,995 6 6 Police Commander (5) MG24 14,470 173,641 15,073 180,876 15,701 188,412 16,355 196,263 17,037 204,440 17,747 212,959 18,486 221,832 19,256 231,075 MG23 14,149 169,782 14,738 176,856 15,352 184,225 15,992 191,901 16,658 199,897 17,352 208,226 18,075 216,902 18,828 225,940 1 1 Finance Director 1 1 Information Technology Director 1 1 Judicial Administrative Officer MG22 13,827 165,923 14,403 172,837 15,003 180,038 15,628 187,540 16,280 195,354 16,958 203,494 17,664 211,973 18,400 220,805 1 1 Development Engineering Director 1 1 Planning Director 1 1 Transportation Systems Director 1 1 Utility Systems Director MG21 13,505 162,065 14,068 168,817 14,654 175,851 15,265 183,179 15,901 190,811 16,563 198,761 17,254 207,043 17,973 215,670 3 3 Sr Assistant City Attorney MG20 13,184 158,206 13,733 164,798 14,305 171,664 14,901 178,817 15,522 186,268 16,169 194,029 16,843 202,114 17,545 210,535 1 1 Parks and Trails Director 1 1 Prosecution Director MG19 12,862 154,347 13,398 160,778 13,957 167,478 14,538 174,456 15,144 181,725 15,775 189,297 16,432 197,184 17,117 205,400 1 1 Economic Development Director MG18 12,541 150,489 13,063 156,759 13,608 163,291 14,175 170,094 14,765 177,182 15,380 184,564 16,021 192,254 16,689 200,265 1 1 Maintenance Services Director MG17 12,219 146,630 12,728 152,740 13,259 159,104 13,811 165,733 14,387 172,639 14,986 179,832 15,610 187,325 16,261 195,130 1 1 Communications and Engagement Director 1 1 Development Services Director 1 1 Government Affairs Manager 1 1 Infrastructure & Security Manager MG16 11,898 142,771 12,393 148,720 12,910 154,917 13,448 161,372 14,008 168,095 14,592 175,099 15,200 182,395 15,833 189,995 1 1 Airport Director 1 1 Development Engineering Manager 1 1 Enterprise Applications Manager 1 1 Facilities Director 1 1 HR Labor Relations & Compensation Manager 1 1 Recreation Director MG15 11,576 138,913 12,058 144,701 12,561 150,730 13,084 157,010 13,629 163,552 14,197 170,367 14,789 177,466 15,405 184,860 1 1 Construction Engineering Manager 1 1 Human Services Director 1 1 ITS and Maintenance Manager 3 3 Utility Engineering Manager MG14 11,255 135,054 11,723 140,681 12,212 146,543 12,721 152,649 13,251 159,009 13,803 165,635 14,378 172,536 14,977 179,725 1 1 Assistant City Attorney 1 1 Budget & Accounting Manager 1 1 Business Recruitment and Retention Manager 1 1 Human Resources Benefits Manager 1 1 Lead Prosecutor 1 1 Redevelopment Manager 1 1 Risk Manager 1 1 Transportation Design Manager 1 1 Transportation Planning Manager 1 1 Transportation Operations Manager MG13 10,933 131,195 11,389 136,662 11,863 142,356 12,357 148,287 12,872 154,466 13,409 160,902 13,967 167,606 14,549 174,590 1 1 City Clerk/Public Records Officer 1 1 Current Planning Manager Authorized 2026 CITY OF RENTON SALARY TABLE NON-REPRESENTED (NON-UNION) Wage Adjustment STEP 1 STEP 2 STEP 3 STEP 4 STEP 5 STEP 6 Effective January 2026STEP 7 STEP 8 ELECTED OFFICIALS As established by the Independent As established by the Independent AGENDA ITEM #2. a) $0 $0 2.7% 2026 CITY OF RENTON SALARY TABLE NON-REPRESENTED Wage Adjustment STEP 1 STEP 2 STEP 3 STEP 4 STEP 5 STEP 6 Effective January 2026STEP 7 STEP 8 1 1 Economic Development Manager 1 1 Emergency Management Director 1 1 Long Range Planning Manager 1 1 Water Maintenance Manager AGENDA ITEM #2. a) $0 $0 2.7% 2026 CITY OF RENTON SALARY TABLE NON-REPRESENTED Wage Adjustment STEP 1 STEP 2 STEP 3 STEP 4 STEP 5 STEP 6 Effective January 2026STEP 7 STEP 8 MG12 10,611 127,337 11,054 132,642 11,514 138,169 11,994 143,926 12,494 149,923 13,014 156,170 13,556 162,677 14,121 169,455 1 1 Asset Manager 1 1 Capital Projects Manager 1 1 Financial Operations Manager 1 1 Organizational Development Manager 1 1 Street Maintenance Manager 1 1 Waste Water/Special Operations Manager MG11 10,290 123,478 10,719 128,623 11,165 133,982 11,630 139,565 12,115 145,380 12,620 151,437 13,146 157,747 13,693 164,320 1 1 Enterprise Content Manager 1 1 Facilities Manager 1 1 Fleet Manager 1 1 Parks Planning & Trails Manager 1 1 Sustainability & Solid Waste Manager MG10 9,968 119,619 10,384 124,603 10,816 129,795 11,267 135,203 11,736 140,837 12,225 146,705 12,735 152,818 13,265 159,185 1 1 Communications Manager 1 1 Parks Maintenance Manager 1 1 Permit Services Manager 1 1 Tax & Licensing Manager NR22 9,647 115,760 10,049 120,584 10,467 125,608 10,904 130,842 11,358 136,294 11,831 141,972 12,324 147,888 12,838 154,050 1 1 Assistant Building Official 1 1 GIS & Data Manager 3 1 4 Prosecuting Attorney 1 1 Recreation Manager 1 -1 0 Human Services Manager NR21 9,325 111,902 9,714 116,564 10,118 121,421 10,540 126,480 10,979 131,750 11,437 137,240 11,913 142,958 12,410 148,915 1 1 Code Compliance Manager 1 1 Financial Operations Supervisor NR20 9,004 108,043 9,379 112,545 9,770 117,234 10,177 122,119 10,601 127,207 11,042 132,508 11,502 138,029 11,982 143,780 1 1 Comms & Community Engagement Manager (PD) 1 1 Golf Course Manager 1 1 Police Manager 1 1 Senior Human Resources Analyst - Workforce & Equity NR19 8,682 104,184 9,044 108,525 9,421 113,047 9,813 117,758 10,222 122,664 10,648 127,775 11,092 133,099 11,554 138,645 2 2 Senior Benefits Analyst 2 2 Senior Employee Relations Analyst 7 7 Senior Finance Analyst 1 1 Urban Forestry and Natural Resources Manager 1 -1 0 Museum Manager NR18 8,361 100,326 8,709 104,506 9,072 108,860 9,450 113,396 9,843 118,121 10,254 123,043 10,681 128,170 11,126 133,510 1 1 Senior Grants Analyst 1 1 Senior Risk Management Analyst NR17 8,039 96,467 8,374 100,487 8,723 104,673 9,086 109,035 9,465 113,578 9,859 118,310 10,270 123,240 10,698 128,375 1 1 Chief of Staff 2 2 Court Services Manager 1 1 Deputy City Clerk/Public Disclosure Manager 1 1 Employee Relations Analyst 1 1 Senior Tax & Licensing Auditor 1 1 Solid Waste Program Manager NR16 7,717 92,608 8,039 96,467 8,374 100,487 8,723 104,673 9,086 109,035 9,465 113,578 9,859 118,310 10,270 123,240 0 0 Benefits Analyst 1 1 Executive Assistant 1 1 Golf Course Supervisor 1 1 Head Golf Professional 1 1 Legal Analyst 2 2 Payroll Technician 3 4 1 5 Recreation Supervisor 0 0 Risk Management Analyst NR15 7,396 88,750 7,704 92,448 8,025 96,300 8,359 100,312 8,708 104,492 9,071 108,846 9,448 113,381 9,842 118,105 1 1 Community Events Coordinator 1 1 Community Outreach Coordinator 0 1 1 Finance Analyst 3 1 1 Parks & Recreation Program Coordinator NR14 7,074 84,891 7,369 88,428 7,676 92,113 7,996 95,951 8,329 99,949 8,676 104,113 9,038 108,451 9,414 112,970 1 1 Tax & Licensing Auditor 2 NR13 6,753 81,032 7,034 84,409 7,327 87,926 7,632 91,589 7,951 95,406 8,282 99,381 8,627 103,522 8,986 107,835 0 0 Finance Analyst 2 NR12 6,431 77,174 6,699 80,389 6,978 83,739 7,269 87,228 7,572 90,862 7,887 94,648 8,216 98,592 8,558 102,700 7 7 Administrative Assistants (All Depts) 0 0 Payroll Technician 2 0 0 Tax & Licensing Auditor 1 NR11 6,110 73,315 6,364 76,370 6,629 79,552 6,906 82,866 7,193 86,319 7,493 89,916 7,805 93,662 8,130 97,565 1 1 Assistant Golf Professional 2 2 Human Resources Specialist NR10 5,788 69,456 6,029 72,350 6,280 75,365 6,542 78,505 6,815 81,776 7,099 85,183 7,394 88,733 7,703 92,430 0 0 Finance Analyst 1 0 0 Payroll Technician 1 NR01 4,654 55,852 4,883 58,601 5,124 61,484 5,384 64,602 5,660 67,918 5,895 70,743 6,140 73,686 6,396 76,751 1 1 Office Specialist AGENDA ITEM #2. a) $0 $0 2.7% 2026 CITY OF RENTON SALARY TABLE NON-REPRESENTED Wage Adjustment STEP 1 STEP 2 STEP 3 STEP 4 STEP 5 STEP 6 Effective January 2026STEP 7 STEP 8 148 1 149 $7,727 Completion of 5 Yrs Completion of 10 Yrs Completion of 15 Yrs Completion of 20 Yrs Completion of 25 Yrs Completion of 30 Yrs (1) In addition to salary receives annual car allowance of $4800 or use of a city vehicle. Not eligible for longevity. (2) (3) Eligible for Longevity at the Non-Represented Longevity pay scale. Not eligible for Education or Uniform Allowance. (4)Eligible for Longevity at the Non-Represented Longevity pay scale and Education Premium. Not eligible for Uniform Allowance. Eligible for 3% cash premium or 3% into deferred compensation per employee's discretion for passing physical fitness. (5)Receive Education/Longevity & Uniform Allowance based on Union Contract. Eligible for 3% deferred compensation for passing physical fitness. Eligible for P2 paid job injury leave based on Union Contract. (6) 4 year term. Not eligible for longevity. (7) Council president to be paid $300/month above council members salary. 7% Step a14E $541 per month Council members salary set per Independent Salary Commission pursuant to Chapter 2-20 RMC. Council receives 2% of salary for deferred comp. If members are prohibited from participating in PERS, they receive an extra 1.4 % of salary for deferred compensation. Not eligible for longevity. The city contributes 4% of employee's base wage per year to a deferred compensation account for Management and Non-Represented employees; except for CAO receives 11% per year. 5% Step a14E $386 per month 6% Step a14E $464 per month 3% Step a14E $232 per month 4% Step a14E $309 per month NON-REPRESENTED LONGEVITY PAY Step a14, E = 2% Step a14E $155 per month AGENDA ITEM #2. a) COLA 2.7% Authorized Grade Position Title Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual a40 12,027 144,324 12,627 151,524 13,268 159,216 13,942 167,304 14,645 175,740 a39 11,754 141,048 12,337 148,044 12,942 155,304 13,601 163,212 14,289 171,468 a38 11,454 137,448 12,027 144,324 12,627 151,524 13,268 159,216 13,942 167,304 5 5 a37 Principal Civil Engineer 11,191 134,292 11,754 141,048 12,337 148,044 12,942 155,304 13,601 163,212 a36 10,908 130,896 11,454 137,448 12,027 144,324 12,627 151,524 13,268 159,216 a35 10,647 127,764 11,191 134,292 11,754 141,048 12,337 148,044 12,942 155,304 1 1 a34 Structural Plans Examiner 10,386 124,632 10,908 130,896 11,454 137,448 12,027 144,324 12,627 151,524 19 1 20 a33 Civil Engineer 3 10,135 121,620 10,647 127,764 11,191 134,292 11,754 141,048 12,337 148,044 1 1 a32 Airport Operations Manager 9,891 118,692 10,386 124,632 10,908 130,896 11,454 137,448 12,027 144,324 2 2 a32 Principal Planner 9,891 118,692 10,386 124,632 10,908 130,896 11,454 137,448 12,027 144,324 1 1 a31 Client Technology Sys & Support Super 9,641 115,692 10,135 121,620 10,647 127,764 11,191 134,292 11,754 141,048 5 5 a30 Civil Engineer 2 9,410 112,920 9,891 118,692 10,386 124,632 10,908 130,896 11,454 137,448 2 2 a30 Senior Systems Analyst 9,410 112,920 9,891 118,692 10,386 124,632 10,908 130,896 11,454 137,448 4 4 a29 Capital Projects Coordinator 9,181 110,172 9,641 115,692 10,135 121,620 10,647 127,764 11,191 134,292 1 1 a29 ITS & Signal Maintenance Supervisor 9,181 110,172 9,641 115,692 10,135 121,620 10,647 127,764 11,191 134,292 1 1 a29 Network & Security Engineer 2 9,181 110,172 9,641 115,692 10,135 121,620 10,647 127,764 11,191 134,292 1 1 a29 Program Development Coordinator 2 9,181 110,172 9,641 115,692 10,135 121,620 10,647 127,764 11,191 134,292 2 2 a29 Senior Network Systems Specialist 9,181 110,172 9,641 115,692 10,135 121,620 10,647 127,764 11,191 134,292 2 2 a29 Senior Planner 9,181 110,172 9,641 115,692 10,135 121,620 10,647 127,764 11,191 134,292 4 4 a28 Senior Business Systems Analyst 8,954 107,448 9,410 112,920 9,891 118,692 10,386 124,632 10,908 130,896 1 1 a28 Transportation Planner 8,954 107,448 9,410 112,920 9,891 118,692 10,386 124,632 10,908 130,896 1 1 a28 Water Treatment Operations Supervisor 8,954 107,448 9,410 112,920 9,891 118,692 10,386 124,632 10,908 130,896 6 6 a27 GIS Analyst 3 8,738 104,856 9,181 110,172 9,641 115,692 10,135 121,620 10,647 127,764 0 0 a27 Systems Analyst 8,738 104,856 9,181 110,172 9,641 115,692 10,135 121,620 10,647 127,764 0 0 a26 Civil Engineer 1 8,522 102,264 8,954 107,448 9,410 112,920 9,891 118,692 10,386 124,632 1 1 a26 Facilities Coordinator 8,522 102,264 8,954 107,448 9,410 112,920 9,891 118,692 10,386 124,632 1 1 a26 Lead Building Inspector 8,522 102,264 8,954 107,448 9,410 112,920 9,891 118,692 10,386 124,632 1 1 a26 Lead Code Compliance Inspector 8,522 102,264 8,954 107,448 9,410 112,920 9,891 118,692 10,386 124,632 1 1 a26 Lead Construction Engineering Inspector 8,522 102,264 8,954 107,448 9,410 112,920 9,891 118,692 10,386 124,632 1 1 a26 Lead Electrical/Ctrl Systems Technician 8,522 102,264 8,954 107,448 9,410 112,920 9,891 118,692 10,386 124,632 1 1 a26 Neighborhood Program Coordinator 8,522 102,264 8,954 107,448 9,410 112,920 9,891 118,692 10,386 124,632 0 0 a26 Program Development Coordinator 1 8,522 102,264 8,954 107,448 9,410 112,920 9,891 118,692 10,386 124,632 0 0 a25 Network & Security Engineer 1 8,315 99,780 8,738 104,856 9,181 110,172 9,641 115,692 10,135 121,620 1 1 a25 Network Systems Specialist 8,315 99,780 8,738 104,856 9,181 110,172 9,641 115,692 10,135 121,620 1 1 a25 Senior Economic Development Specialist 8,315 99,780 8,738 104,856 9,181 110,172 9,641 115,692 10,135 121,620 1 1 a24 Airport Ops & Maintenance Supervisor 8,114 97,368 8,522 102,264 8,954 107,448 9,410 112,920 9,891 118,692 2 2 a24 Building Plan Reviewer 8,114 97,368 8,522 102,264 8,954 107,448 9,410 112,920 9,891 118,692 0 0 a24 Business Systems Analyst 8,114 97,368 8,522 102,264 8,954 107,448 9,410 112,920 9,891 118,692 6 6 a24 Engineering Specialist 3 8,114 97,368 8,522 102,264 8,954 107,448 9,410 112,920 9,891 118,692 1 1 a24 GIS Analyst 2 8,114 97,368 8,522 102,264 8,954 107,448 9,410 112,920 9,891 118,692 1 1 a24 Property Services Specialist 8,114 97,368 8,522 102,264 8,954 107,448 9,410 112,920 9,891 118,692 1 1 a24 Street Maintenance Services Supervisor 8,114 97,368 8,522 102,264 8,954 107,448 9,410 112,920 9,891 118,692 2 2 a24 Waste Water Maint. Services Supervisor 8,114 97,368 8,522 102,264 8,954 107,448 9,410 112,920 9,891 118,692 1 1 a24 Water Maintenance Services Supervisor 8,114 97,368 8,522 102,264 8,954 107,448 9,410 112,920 9,891 118,692 1 1 a23 Client Technology Services Specialist 3 7,918 95,016 8,315 99,780 8,738 104,856 9,181 110,172 9,641 115,692 2 2 a23 Custodial Maintenance Supervisor 7,918 95,016 8,315 99,780 8,738 104,856 9,181 110,172 9,641 115,692 1 1 a23 Data Analyst 7,918 95,016 8,315 99,780 8,738 104,856 9,181 110,172 9,641 115,692 2 2 a23 Emergency Management Coordinator 7,918 95,016 8,315 99,780 8,738 104,856 9,181 110,172 9,641 115,692 1 1 a23 Facilities Supervisor 7,918 95,016 8,315 99,780 8,738 104,856 9,181 110,172 9,641 115,692 1 1 a23 Housing Repair Coordinator 7,918 95,016 8,315 99,780 8,738 104,856 9,181 110,172 9,641 115,692 Effective January 1, 2026 STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E 2026 CITY OF RENTON SALARY TABLE AFSCME, Local 2170 2025 FTE Addition/ Removal 2026 FTE AGENDA ITEM #2. a) COLA 2.7% Authorized Grade Position Title Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Effective January 1, 2026 STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E 2026 CITY OF RENTON SALARY TABLE AFSCME, Local 2170 2025 FTE Addition/ Removal 2026 FTE 1 1 a23 Pavement Management Technician 7,918 95,016 8,315 99,780 8,738 104,856 9,181 110,172 9,641 115,692 0 0 a23 Plan Reviewer 7,918 95,016 8,315 99,780 8,738 104,856 9,181 110,172 9,641 115,692 0 0 a23 Senior Paralegal 7,918 95,016 8,315 99,780 8,738 104,856 9,181 110,172 9,641 115,692 4 4 a23 Signal & ITS Technician 3 7,918 95,016 8,315 99,780 8,738 104,856 9,181 110,172 9,641 115,692 1 1 a23 Utility Accounts Supervisor 7,918 95,016 8,315 99,780 8,738 104,856 9,181 110,172 9,641 115,692 6 6 a22 Associate Planner 7,727 92,724 8,114 97,368 8,522 102,264 8,954 107,448 9,410 112,920 2 2 a22 Building Inspector/Combination 7,727 92,724 8,114 97,368 8,522 102,264 8,954 107,448 9,410 112,920 3 3 a22 Building Inspector/Electrical 7,727 92,724 8,114 97,368 8,522 102,264 8,954 107,448 9,410 112,920 2 2 a22 Case Manager 7,727 92,724 8,114 97,368 8,522 102,264 8,954 107,448 9,410 112,920 4 4 a22 Code Compliance Inspector 7,727 92,724 8,114 97,368 8,522 102,264 8,954 107,448 9,410 112,920 1 1 a22 Communications Specialist 2 7,727 92,724 8,114 97,368 8,522 102,264 8,954 107,448 9,410 112,920 7 7 a22 Construction Engineering Inspector 7,727 92,724 8,114 97,368 8,522 102,264 8,954 107,448 9,410 112,920 0 0 a22 GIS Analyst 1 7,727 92,724 8,114 97,368 8,522 102,264 8,954 107,448 9,410 112,920 2 2 a22 Parks Maintenance Supervisor 7,727 92,724 8,114 97,368 8,522 102,264 8,954 107,448 9,410 112,920 1 1 a22 Water Meter Tech. Services Supervisor 7,727 92,724 8,114 97,368 8,522 102,264 8,954 107,448 9,410 112,920 1 1 a21 Business Coordinator - Airport 7,533 90,396 7,918 95,016 8,315 99,780 8,738 104,856 9,181 110,172 1 1 a21 Human Services Coordinator 7,533 90,396 7,918 95,016 8,315 99,780 8,738 104,856 9,181 110,172 1 1 a21 Lead Vehicle & Equipment Mechanic 7,533 90,396 7,918 95,016 8,315 99,780 8,738 104,856 9,181 110,172 1 1 a21 Public Records Analyst 7,533 90,396 7,918 95,016 8,315 99,780 8,738 104,856 9,181 110,172 1 1 a21 Traffic Signage & Marking Supervisor 7,533 90,396 7,918 95,016 8,315 99,780 8,738 104,856 9,181 110,172 1 1 a21 SCADA/Telemetry Technician 7,533 90,396 7,918 95,016 8,315 99,780 8,738 104,856 9,181 110,172 1 1 a20 Client Technology Services Specialist 2 7,349 88,188 7,727 92,724 8,114 97,368 8,522 102,264 8,954 107,448 1 1 a20 Economic Development Specialist 7,349 88,188 7,727 92,724 8,114 97,368 8,522 102,264 8,954 107,448 1 1 a20 Engineering Specialist 2 7,349 88,188 7,727 92,724 8,114 97,368 8,522 102,264 8,954 107,448 1 1 a20 Enterprise Content Specialist 2 7,349 88,188 7,727 92,724 8,114 97,368 8,522 102,264 8,954 107,448 1 1 a20 Inspecting Arborist 7,349 88,188 7,727 92,724 8,114 97,368 8,522 102,264 8,954 107,448 1 1 a20 Senior Program Specialist 7,349 88,188 7,727 92,724 8,114 97,368 8,522 102,264 8,954 107,448 1 1 a19 Electrical Technician 7,169 86,028 7,533 90,396 7,918 95,016 8,315 99,780 8,738 104,856 1 1 a19 Encampment Clean-Up Lead 7,169 86,028 7,533 90,396 7,918 95,016 8,315 99,780 8,738 104,856 1 1 a19 Farmers Market Coordinator 7,169 86,028 7,533 90,396 7,918 95,016 8,315 99,780 8,738 104,856 1 1 a19 HVAC Systems Technician 7,169 86,028 7,533 90,396 7,918 95,016 8,315 99,780 8,738 104,856 7 7 a19 Recreation Program Coordinator 7,169 86,028 7,533 90,396 7,918 95,016 8,315 99,780 8,738 104,856 3 3 a19 Senior Sustainability Specialist 7,169 86,028 7,533 90,396 7,918 95,016 8,315 99,780 8,738 104,856 0 0 a19 Signal & ITS Technician 2 7,169 86,028 7,533 90,396 7,918 95,016 8,315 99,780 8,738 104,856 4 4 a19 Water Treatment Plant Operator 7,169 86,028 7,533 90,396 7,918 95,016 8,315 99,780 8,738 104,856 1 1 a18 Assistant Planner 7,001 84,012 7,349 88,188 7,727 92,724 8,114 97,368 8,522 102,264 0 0 a18 Development Services Representative 7,001 84,012 7,349 88,188 7,727 92,724 8,114 97,368 8,522 102,264 1 1 a18 Lead Golf Course Maintenance Worker 7,001 84,012 7,349 88,188 7,727 92,724 8,114 97,368 8,522 102,264 7 7 a18 Lead Maintenance Services Worker 7,001 84,012 7,349 88,188 7,727 92,724 8,114 97,368 8,522 102,264 2 2 a18 Lead Parks Maintenance Worker 7,001 84,012 7,349 88,188 7,727 92,724 8,114 97,368 8,522 102,264 1 1 a18 Maintenance Buyer 7,001 84,012 7,349 88,188 7,727 92,724 8,114 97,368 8,522 102,264 4 1 5 a18 Paralegal 7,001 84,012 7,349 88,188 7,727 92,724 8,114 97,368 8,522 102,264 1 1 a18 Water Utility Maintenance Technician 7,001 84,012 7,349 88,188 7,727 92,724 8,114 97,368 8,522 102,264 1 1 a17 Digital Communications Specialist 6,825 81,900 7,169 86,028 7,533 90,396 7,918 95,016 8,315 99,780 2 2 a17 Lift Station Technician 6,825 81,900 7,169 86,028 7,533 90,396 7,918 95,016 8,315 99,780 0.75 0.75 a17 Program Assistant 6,825 81,900 7,169 86,028 7,533 90,396 7,918 95,016 8,315 99,780 1 1 a17 Public Records Specialist 6,825 81,900 7,169 86,028 7,533 90,396 7,918 95,016 8,315 99,780 1 1 a17 Senior Traffic Maintenance Worker 6,825 81,900 7,169 86,028 7,533 90,396 7,918 95,016 8,315 99,780 0.5 0.5 a17 Sustainability Specialist 6,825 81,900 7,169 86,028 7,533 90,396 7,918 95,016 8,315 99,780 0 0 a17 Water Treatment Plant Operator Trainee 6,825 81,900 7,169 86,028 7,533 90,396 7,918 95,016 8,315 99,780 2 2 a16 City Clerk Specialist 2 6,666 79,992 7,001 84,012 7,349 88,188 7,727 92,724 8,114 97,368 2 2 a16 Client Technology Services Specialist 1 6,666 79,992 7,001 84,012 7,349 88,188 7,727 92,724 8,114 97,368 1 1 a16 Court Operations Specialist 6,666 79,992 7,001 84,012 7,349 88,188 7,727 92,724 8,114 97,368 0 0 a16 Enterprise Content Specialist 1 6,666 79,992 7,001 84,012 7,349 88,188 7,727 92,724 8,114 97,368 2 1 3 a16 Facilities Technician 2 6,666 79,992 7,001 84,012 7,349 88,188 7,727 92,724 8,114 97,368 0.75 0.75 a16 Recreation Specialist 6,666 79,992 7,001 84,012 7,349 88,188 7,727 92,724 8,114 97,368 5 5 a16 Vehicle & Equipment Mechanic 2 6,666 79,992 7,001 84,012 7,349 88,188 7,727 92,724 8,114 97,368 1 1 a15 Airport Operations Specialist 6,494 77,928 6,825 81,900 7,169 86,028 7,533 90,396 7,918 95,016 1 1 a15 Asset Management Systems Technician 6,494 77,928 6,825 81,900 7,169 86,028 7,533 90,396 7,918 95,016 1 1 a15 Communications Specialist 1 6,494 77,928 6,825 81,900 7,169 86,028 7,533 90,396 7,918 95,016 AGENDA ITEM #2. a) COLA 2.7% Authorized Grade Position Title Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Effective January 1, 2026 STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E 2026 CITY OF RENTON SALARY TABLE AFSCME, Local 2170 2025 FTE Addition/ Removal 2026 FTE 1 1 a15 Grounds Equipment Mechanic 6,494 77,928 6,825 81,900 7,169 86,028 7,533 90,396 7,918 95,016 1 1 a15 Housing Maintenance Technician 6,494 77,928 6,825 81,900 7,169 86,028 7,533 90,396 7,918 95,016 4 4 a15 Planning Technician 6,494 77,928 6,825 81,900 7,169 86,028 7,533 90,396 7,918 95,016 1 1 a15 Signal & ITS Technician 1 6,494 77,928 6,825 81,900 7,169 86,028 7,533 90,396 7,918 95,016 1 1 a14 Engineering Specialist 1 6,341 76,092 6,666 79,992 7,001 84,012 7,349 88,188 7,727 92,724 4 4 a14 Facilities Technician 1 6,341 76,092 6,666 79,992 7,001 84,012 7,349 88,188 7,727 92,724 1 1 a14 Golf Course Maintenance Worker 3 6,341 76,092 6,666 79,992 7,001 84,012 7,349 88,188 7,727 92,724 26 26 a14 Maintenance Services Worker 3 6,341 76,092 6,666 79,992 7,001 84,012 7,349 88,188 7,727 92,724 12 12 a14 Parks Maintenance Worker 3 6,341 76,092 6,666 79,992 7,001 84,012 7,349 88,188 7,727 92,724 3 3 a14 Permit Services Specialist 6,341 76,092 6,666 79,992 7,001 84,012 7,349 88,188 7,727 92,724 1 1 a14 Print & Mail Supervisor 6,341 76,092 6,666 79,992 7,001 84,012 7,349 88,188 7,727 92,724 0 0 a14 Program Specialist 6,341 76,092 6,666 79,992 7,001 84,012 7,349 88,188 7,727 92,724 1 1 a14 Recreation Systems Technician 6,341 76,092 6,666 79,992 7,001 84,012 7,349 88,188 7,727 92,724 3 3 a14 Traffic Maintenance Worker 2 6,341 76,092 6,666 79,992 7,001 84,012 7,349 88,188 7,727 92,724 3 3 a13 Judicial Specialist 2 6,184 74,208 6,494 77,928 6,825 81,900 7,169 86,028 7,533 90,396 3 3 a12 Airport Maintenance Worker 6,037 72,444 6,341 76,092 6,666 79,992 7,001 84,012 7,349 88,188 0 0 a12 City Clerk Specialist 1 6,037 72,444 6,341 76,092 6,666 79,992 7,001 84,012 7,349 88,188 0 0 a12 Vehicle & Equipment Mechanic 1 6,037 72,444 6,341 76,092 6,666 79,992 7,001 84,012 7,349 88,188 1 1 a12 Water Meter System Specialist 6,037 72,444 6,341 76,092 6,666 79,992 7,001 84,012 7,349 88,188 2 2 a11 Encampment Clean-Up Worker 5,888 70,656 6,184 74,208 6,494 77,928 6,825 81,900 7,169 86,028 1 1 a11 Fleet Management Technician 5,888 70,656 6,184 74,208 6,494 77,928 6,825 81,900 7,169 86,028 1 1 a11 IT Procurement & Contract Coordinator 5,888 70,656 6,184 74,208 6,494 77,928 6,825 81,900 7,169 86,028 2 2 a11 Lead Maintenance Custodian 5,888 70,656 6,184 74,208 6,494 77,928 6,825 81,900 7,169 86,028 2 2 a11 Legal Assistant 5,888 70,656 6,184 74,208 6,494 77,928 6,825 81,900 7,169 86,028 AGENDA ITEM #2. a) COLA 2.7% Authorized Grade Position Title Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Effective January 1, 2026 STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E 2026 CITY OF RENTON SALARY TABLE AFSCME, Local 2170 2025 FTE Addition/ Removal 2026 FTE 7 7 a10 Accounting Assistant 4 5,744 68,928 6,037 72,444 6,341 76,092 6,666 79,992 7,001 84,012 14 14 a10 Administrative Secretary 1 5,744 68,928 6,037 72,444 6,341 76,092 6,666 79,992 7,001 84,012 1 1 a10 Golf Course Maintenance Worker 2 5,744 68,928 6,037 72,444 6,341 76,092 6,666 79,992 7,001 84,012 1 1 a10 Golf Course Operations Assistant 5,744 68,928 6,037 72,444 6,341 76,092 6,666 79,992 7,001 84,012 23 23 a10 Maintenance Services Worker 2 5,744 68,928 6,037 72,444 6,341 76,092 6,666 79,992 7,001 84,012 6 6 a10 Parks Maintenance Worker 2 5,744 68,928 6,037 72,444 6,341 76,092 6,666 79,992 7,001 84,012 3 3 a10 Recreation Assistant 5,744 68,928 6,037 72,444 6,341 76,092 6,666 79,992 7,001 84,012 0 0 a10 Traffic Maintenance Worker 1 5,744 68,928 6,037 72,444 6,341 76,092 6,666 79,992 7,001 84,012 5 5 a09 Judicial Specialist 1 5,603 67,236 5,888 70,656 6,184 74,208 6,494 77,928 6,825 81,900 1 1 a09 Purchasing Assistant 5,603 67,236 5,888 70,656 6,184 74,208 6,494 77,928 6,825 81,900 1 1 a08 Accounting Assistant 3 5,468 65,616 5,744 68,928 6,037 72,444 6,341 76,092 6,666 79,992 1 1 a08 Court Security Officer 5,468 65,616 5,744 68,928 6,037 72,444 6,341 76,092 6,666 79,992 3 3 a08 Maintenance Custodian 5,468 65,616 5,744 68,928 6,037 72,444 6,341 76,092 6,666 79,992 2 2 a08 Secretary 2 5,468 65,616 5,744 68,928 6,037 72,444 6,341 76,092 6,666 79,992 2 2 a08 Water Meter Technician 5,468 65,616 5,744 68,928 6,037 72,444 6,341 76,092 6,666 79,992 4 4 a07 Maintenance Services Worker 1 5,335 64,020 5,603 67,236 5,888 70,656 6,184 74,208 6,494 77,928 0 0 a06 Accounting Assistant 2 5,210 62,520 5,468 65,616 5,744 68,928 6,037 72,444 6,341 76,092 0 0 a06 Golf Course Maintenance Worker 1 5,210 62,520 5,468 65,616 5,744 68,928 6,037 72,444 6,341 76,092 2 2 a06 Parks Maintenance Worker 1 5,210 62,520 5,468 65,616 5,744 68,928 6,037 72,444 6,341 76,092 a05 5,080 60,960 5,335 64,020 5,603 67,236 5,888 70,656 6,184 74,208 0 0 a04 Accounting Assistant 1 4,958 59,496 5,210 62,520 5,468 65,616 5,744 68,928 6,037 72,444 6 6 a04 Parks Maintenance Assistant 4,958 59,496 5,210 62,520 5,468 65,616 5,744 68,928 6,037 72,444 1 1 a04 Print & Mail Assistant 4,958 59,496 5,210 62,520 5,468 65,616 5,744 68,928 6,037 72,444 2 2 a04 Pro Shop Assistant 4,958 59,496 5,210 62,520 5,468 65,616 5,744 68,928 6,037 72,444 1 1 a03 Golf Course Associate 4,836 58,032 5,080 60,960 5,335 64,020 5,603 67,236 5,888 70,656 13 13 a02 Custodian 4,728 56,736 4,958 59,496 5,210 62,520 5,468 65,616 5,744 68,928 a01 4,604 55,248 4,836 58,032 5,080 60,960 5,335 64,020 5,603 67,236 366 3 369 $7,727 Completion of 5 Yrs Completion of 10 Yrs Completion of 15 Yrs Completion of 20 Yrs Completion of 25 Yrs Completion of 30 Yrs 4% Step a14E $309 per month 5% Step a14E $386 per month - The city contributes 3% of employee's base wage per year to a deferred compensation account. (Article 14 of Agreement By and Between City of Renton and Local 2170, Washington State Council of County and City Employees, American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees) - The city contributes 1% of employee's base wage per year to a VEBA account. (Article 12.3 of AFSCME CBA) 6% Step a14E $464 per month 7% Step a14E $541 per month 3% Step a14E $232 per month LONGEVITY PAY Step a14, E = 2% Step a14E $155 per month AGENDA ITEM #2. a) 3.5% Grade Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Police Chief See Non-Represented Salary Table, Grade P3 Police Deputy Chief See Non-Represented Salary Table, Grade P2 Police Commander See Non-Represented Salary Table, Grade P1 17 17 pc61 Sergeant* 12,275 147,300 13,257 159,084 111 4 115 pc60 8,649 103,788 9,332 111,984 9,999 119,988 10,674 128,088 pc59 8,141 97,692 8,782 105,384 9,411 112,932 10,045 120,540 128 4 132 Percent Interpreters -----------------------3% Detectives ------------------------3% Traffic Assignment---------------3% Motorcycle Assignment------------- 2% Background Investigator------------ 3% Canine Officer -------------------4% Corporal Assignment -----------7.5% Field Training Officer ------------3% 8% when assigned student(s) Training Officer-------------------3% SWAT Assignment ---------------4% SRO Assignment-----------------3% Civil Disturbance Paid at rate of double time with 3 hrs Unit --------------------------------minimum when called to an emergency. Special Weapons and Tactics------------------------ Negotiator-------------------------4% SET/DET---------------------------- VIIT----------------------------------2%* VIIT Lead------------------------------- 4%* Percentage (of base wage) Wage Adjustment 2026 CITY OF RENTON SALARY TABLE POLICE DEPARTMENT - Commissioned Officers Position Title HAZARD DUTY AND PREMIUM PAY (Article 6.7 and 6.8) Frozen Frozen Budgeted Police Officer 2 (2189 Schedule) (6.25% over Police Police Officer 1 (Newly Hired 2080 2025 FTE Addition /Remov 2026 FTE (15% over Police Officer 2) *Step increase at 12 months Effective January 1 2026 STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E Paid at rate of time and one half with a MONTHLY LONGEVITY PAY (Appendix B) Years of Service Completion of 5 Yrs 2% 3% minimum when called to an *In addition to a paid rate of time and one half with 3 hr minimum when called out. Completion of 10 Yrs 4% Completion of 15 Yrs 6% Completion of 20 Yrs 10% Completion of 25 Yrs 12% Completion of 30 Yrs 14% AGENDA ITEM #2. a) 3.5% Grade Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Wage Adjustment 2026 CITY OF RENTON SALARY TABLE POLICE DEPARTMENT - Commissioned Officers Position Title Budgeted 2025 FTE Addition /Remov 2026 FTE Effective January 1 2026 STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E Percentage (of base wage) - - - 6% The city contributes 1% of employee's wage base toward deferred compensation. (Appendix A.2.2 of Agreement By and Between City of Renton and Renton Police Guild Representing Commissioned Employees (January 1, 2024-December 31, 2026) (Commissioned Guild CBA)) BA Degree/Masters Degree AA Degree (90 credits) NOTE: Please refer to the current labor agreement for specific information. MONTHLY EDUCATIONAL INCENTIVE PAY (Appendix B) 4% The city contributes 3% of employee's wage base toward deferred compensation for passing physical fitness. (Article 6.8.4, and Appendix A.2.3 of Commissioned Guild CBA) Effective January 1, 2025, the city contributes 3% of employee's wage base to a VEBA plan. (Article 14.10 of Commissioned Guild CBA) AGENDA ITEM #2. a) 3.0% Grade Position Title Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual pn70 7,597 91,164 8,213 98,556 9,025 108,300 9,917 119,004 10,439 125,268 pn69 7,411 88,932 8,011 96,132 8,804 105,648 9,676 116,112 10,184 122,208 pn68 7,231 86,772 7,818 93,816 8,590 103,080 9,439 113,268 9,936 119,232 33pn67Community Engagement Coord.7,054 84,648 7,627 91,524 8,381 100,572 9,208 110,496 9,693 116,316 pn66 6,881 82,572 7,441 89,292 8,175 98,100 8,984 107,808 9,455 113,460 pn65 6,714 80,568 7,258 87,096 7,977 95,724 8,765 105,180 9,227 110,724 11pn64 Crime Analyst 6,693 80,316 7,232 86,784 7,944 95,328 8,564 102,768 8,993 107,916 pn63 6,391 76,692 6,909 82,908 7,590 91,080 8,343 100,116 8,782 105,384 2 2 pn62 Police Services Specialist Supervisor 8,813 105,756 (15% above Specialist, Step E) 2(2)0 Electronic Home Detention Coord 6,229 74,748 6,722 80,664 7,402 88,824 8,138 97,656 8,543 102,516 pn60 6,314 75,768 6,823 81,876 7,494 89,928 8,079 96,948 8,484 101,808 1 1 pn59 Domestic Violence Victim Advocate 5,894 70,728 6,402 76,824 7,114 85,368 7,822 93,864 8,236 98,832 3 3 pn58 Evidence Technician 5,943 71,316 6,415 76,980 7,060 84,720 7,765 93,180 8,166 97,992 1 1 pn57 Police Services Specialist Lead 8,238 98,856 (7.5% above Specialist, Step E) 2 2 pn56 Animal Control Officer 5,604 67,248 6,059 72,708 6,663 79,956 7,327 87,924 7,695 92,340 16 16 pn54 Police Services Specialist 5,582 66,984 6,030 72,360 6,637 79,644 7,301 87,612 7,663 91,956 3 3 pn53 Police Administrative Specialist 4,997 59,964 5,402 64,824 5,939 71,268 6,533 78,396 6,855 82,260 2 2 pn52 Parking Enforcement Officer 4,841 58,092 5,224 62,688 5,755 69,060 6,330 75,960 6,642 79,704 36 (2)34 2026 CITY OF RENTON SALARY TABLE POLICE DEPARTMENT - Non-Commissioned Employees STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E Budgeted 2025 FTE Addition /Remova 2026 FTE pn61 AGENDA ITEM #2. a) 3.0% 2026 CITY OF RENTON SALARY TABLE POLICE DEPARTMENT - Non-Commissioned Employees Interpreter Premium…………...……………………..…………….................…3% of base pay (Article 6.5.2) 4% of base pay (Article 6.5.3) 4% of base pay (Article 6.5.1) Double time with 3 hrs min (Article 6.4) AA Degree (90 credits) POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED - MONTHLY LONGEVITY INCENTIVE PAY SCHEDULE (Article 12, Appendix B.1) Years of Service Percentage (of base wage) NON-COMMISSIONED PREMIUM PAY (Articles 6.4 and 6.5) Public Records Act Premium……..…………………………………...............… Field Training Officer, FTO (Police Service Specialist)…...............……… Crisis Communication Unit………..........…………………………..............… Completion of 15 Yrs 6% Completion of 20 Yrs 10% Completion of 5 Yrs 2% Completion of 10 Yrs 4% Completion of 25 Yrs 12% Completion of 30 Yrs 14% MONTHLY EDUCATIONAL INCENTIVE PAY SCHEDULE (Appendix B.2) Percentage (of base wage) BA/BS Degree or Masters Degree 6% - The city contributes 3.5% of the employee's base wage to a deferred comp account. (Appendix A.3 of Non- Commissioned Guild CBA) - The city contributes an additional 3% of employee's wage base toward deferred comp for passing physical fitness. (Article 6.8 of Non-Commissioned Guild CBA) - The city contributes 2% of the employee's base wage to a VEBA plan. (Article 14.10 of Agreement By and Between City of Renton and Non-Commissioned Employees of the Renton Police Guild (2024-2026) (Non- Commissioned Guild CBA)) 4% AGENDA ITEM #2. a) Grade h51 21.57 h52 22.00 h53 23.00 h54 24.00 h55 25.00 h56 26.00 h57 27.00 h58 28.00 h59 29.00 h60 30.00 h61 31.00 h62 32.00 h63 33.00 h64 34.00 h65 35.00 h66 40.00 h67 45.00 h68 50.00 h69 55.00 h70 60.00 h71 65.00 h72 70.00 h73 75.00 h74 80.00 h75 85.00 h76 90.00 h77 95.00 h78 100.00 2026 CITY OF RENTON SUPPLEMENTAL EMPLOYEE WAGE TABLE AGENDA ITEM #2. a) BEGINNING FUND BALANCE REVENUES EXPENDITURES ENDING FUND BALANCE Fund 2025 Beg Fund Bal Changes 2025 Adjusted Fund Bal 2025 Budgeted Revenue Changes 2025 Adjusted Revenue 2025 Budgeted Expenditure Changes 2025 Adjusted Expenditure Ending Fund Balance Reserved/ Designated Available Fund Balance 0XX GENERAL FUND 115,968,224 - 115,968,224 140,674,865 10,618,334 151,293,199 153,311,658 15,337,496 168,649,154 98,612,269 (22,737,899) 75,874,370 110 SPECIAL HOTEL-MOTEL TAX 1,184,978 - 1,184,978 355,000 - 355,000 644,939 - 644,939 895,040 895,040 127 CABLE COMMUNICATIONS DEVELOPMENT 372,210 - 372,210 60,000 - 60,000 97,674 25,000 122,674 309,536 309,536 130 HOUSING AND SUPPORTIVE SERVICES 15,430,639 - 15,430,639 4,030,000 - 4,030,000 6,595,719 92,500 6,688,219 12,772,420 12,772,420 135 SPRINGBROOK WETLANDS BANK 722,963 - 722,963 - - - 40,000 - 40,000 682,963 682,963 140 POLICE SEIZURE 790,432 - 790,432 - - - 790,432 - 790,432 - - 141 POLICE CSAM SEIZURE 132,667 - 132,667 - - - 132,667 - 132,667 - - 150 AFFORDABLE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT 292,923 - 292,923 - - - - - - 292,923 292,923 215 GENERAL GOVERNMENT MISC DEBT SVC 5,812,247 - 5,812,247 2,950,225 - 2,950,225 2,952,717 - 2,952,717 5,809,755 (2,706,325) 3,103,430 303 COMMUNITY SERVICES IMPACT MITIGATION 359,743 - 359,743 100,000 - 100,000 105,000 - 105,000 354,743 354,743 304 FIRE IMPACT MITIGATION 2,489 - 2,489 200,000 - 200,000 200,000 - 200,000 2,489.31 (2,489) - 305 TRANSPORTATION IMPACT MITIGATION 3,613,321 - 3,613,321 1,000,000 - 1,000,000 1,450,935 - 1,450,935 3,162,387 3,162,387 308 REET 1 5,060,894 - 5,060,894 2,520,000 - 2,520,000 4,560,000 2,000,000 6,560,000 1,020,894 1,020,894 309 REET 2 2,312,665 - 2,312,665 2,520,000 - 2,520,000 2,799,625 - 2,799,625 2,033,040 2,033,040 31X SCHOOL DISTRICT IMPACT MITIGATION 2,368 - 2,368 600,000 - 600,000 600,000 - 600,000 2,368 - 2,368 316 MUNICIPAL FACILITIES CIP 28,180,515 - 28,180,515 20,312,336 20,930,998 41,243,334 42,751,490 24,034,885 66,786,375 2,637,475 2,637,475 317 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT 14,132,444 - 14,132,444 33,179,715 1,190,948 34,370,663 42,796,146 1,975,474 44,771,621 3,731,486 3,731,486 346 NEW FAMILY FIRST CENTER DEVELOPMENT 3,937,547 - 3,937,547 - 82,641 82,641 - 4,020,187 4,020,187 - - 402 AIRPORT OPERATIONS & CIP 13,353,300 - 13,353,300 5,151,234 17,909,098 23,060,331 15,251,099 17,925,652 33,176,751 3,236,881 (287,557) 2,949,324 403 SOLID WASTE UTILITY 3,972,834 - 3,972,834 27,285,119 1,131,694 28,416,813 27,714,646 1,133,778 28,848,424 3,541,223 (400,000) 3,141,223 404 GOLF COURSE SYSTEM & CAPITAL 2,611,728 - 2,611,728 4,650,594 - 4,650,594 5,390,273 1,998 5,392,271 1,870,050 (998,353) 871,697 405 WATER OPERATIONS & CAPITAL 56,673,939 - 56,673,939 19,912,731 30,751 19,943,481 51,889,092 54,148 51,943,239 24,674,180 (3,157,328) 21,516,852 406 WASTEWATER OPERATIONS & CAPITAL 27,706,296 - 27,706,296 12,765,439 - 12,765,439 27,854,666 9,815 27,864,481 12,607,253 (1,677,307) 10,929,946 407 SURFACE WATER OPERATIONS & CAPITAL 25,766,980 - 25,766,980 32,714,435 (2,126,063) 30,588,372 40,617,905 (1,965,108) 38,652,798 17,702,554 (2,068,195) 15,634,359 416 KING COUNTY METRO 7,647,811 - 7,647,811 22,791,462 500,000 23,291,462 22,791,462 500,000 23,291,462 7,647,811 (380,000) 7,267,811 501 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 19,535,828 - 19,535,828 7,163,736 - 7,163,736 12,050,727 792,160 12,842,887 13,856,677 (13,856,677) - 502 INSURANCE 25,781,346 - 25,781,346 8,020,527 2,400,000 10,420,527 7,970,555 1,447,132 9,417,688 26,784,185 (22,268,021) 4,516,164 503 INFORMATION SERVICES 9,632,207 - 9,632,207 10,106,932 (52,868) 10,054,064 14,508,707 199,582 14,708,289 4,977,982 (2,785,647) 2,192,335 504 FACILITIES 1,962,169 - 1,962,169 7,696,815 - 7,696,815 8,046,138 39,837 8,085,974 1,573,009 (970,317) 602,692 505 COMMUNICATIONS 779,556 - 779,556 3,791 - 3,791 783,348 - 783,348 - - 512 HEALTHCARE INSURANCE 10,517,642 - 10,517,642 16,538,492 - 16,538,492 17,049,360 - 17,049,360 10,006,774 (5,114,808) 4,891,966 522 LEOFF1 RETIREES HEALTHCARE 20,672,179 - 20,672,179 920,000 - 920,000 1,686,222 - 1,686,222 19,905,957 (19,905,957) - 611 FIREMENS PENSION 9,636,752 - 9,636,752 1,500,000 - 1,500,000 275,475 50,000 325,475 10,811,277 (10,811,277) - Total Other Funds 318,591,613 - 318,591,613 245,048,581 41,997,199 287,045,780 360,397,017 52,337,041 412,734,058 192,903,336 (87,390,259) 105,513,077 TOTAL ALL FUNDS 434,559,837 - 434,559,837 385,723,446 52,615,533 438,338,979 513,708,675 67,674,538 581,383,212 291,515,604 (110,128,157) 181,387,447 CARRY FORWARD 34,979 CARRY FORWARD 156,891 NEW 52,580,553 NEW 67,517,647 2025 Adjustment By Fund H:\Finance\Budget\2025-2026 Budget\2.Budget Adjustments\03_2025.Mid.Bi\00MASTER_2025.Q3 Mid-Bi Budget Amendment AG E N D A I T E M # 2 . a ) BEGINNING FUND BALANCE REVENUES EXPENDITURES ENDING FUND BALANCE Fund 2026 Beg Fund Bal Changes 2026 Adjusted Fund Bal 2026 Budgeted Revenue Changes 2026 Adjusted Revenue 2026 Budgeted Expenditure Changes 2026 Adjusted Expenditure Ending Fund Balance Reserved/ Designated Available Fund Balance 0XX GENERAL FUND 103,339,181 (4,726,913) 98,612,269 141,097,362 8,910,000 150,007,362 146,616,994 6,787,087 153,404,081 95,215,550 (20,908,490) 74,307,060 110 SPECIAL HOTEL-MOTEL TAX 895,040 - 895,040 350,000 - 350,000 - - - 1,245,040 1,245,040 127 CABLE COMMUNICATIONS DEVELOPMENT 334,536 (25,000) 309,536 60,000 - 60,000 97,674 - 97,674 271,862 271,862 130 HOUSING AND SUPPORTIVE SERVICES 16,264,920 (3,492,500) 12,772,420 4,030,000 - 4,030,000 1,750,000 185,000 1,935,000 14,867,420 14,867,420 135 SPRINGBROOK WETLANDS BANK 682,963 - 682,963 - - - 40,000 - 40,000 642,963 642,963 140 POLICE SEIZURE - - - - - - - - - - - 141 POLICE CSAM SEIZURE - - - - - - - - - - - 150 AFFORDABLE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT 292,923 - 292,923 - - - - - - 292,923 - 292,923 215 GENERAL GOVERNMENT MISC DEBT SVC 5,782,755 27,000 5,809,755 2,943,075 - 2,943,075 2,941,644 - 2,941,644 5,811,186 (2,704,675) 3,106,511 303 COMMUNITY SERVICES IMPACT MITIGATION 354,743 - 354,743 100,000 - 100,000 - - - 454,743 454,743 304 FIRE IMPACT MITIGATION 2,489 - 2,489 200,000 - 200,000 200,000 - 200,000 2,489 (2,489) - 305 TRANSPORTATION IMPACT MITIGATION 4,363,321 (1,200,935) 3,162,387 1,000,000 - 1,000,000 749,000 - 749,000 3,413,387 3,413,387 308 REET 1 3,020,894 (2,000,000) 1,020,894 2,520,000 - 2,520,000 900,000 (200,000) 700,000 2,840,894 2,840,894 309 REET 2 2,033,040 - 2,033,040 2,520,000 - 2,520,000 2,146,475 - 2,146,475 2,406,565 2,406,565 31X SCHOOL DISTRICT IMPACT MITIGATION 2,368 - 2,368 600,000 (590,000) 10,000 600,000 (590,000) 10,000 2,368 - 2,368 316 MUNICIPAL FACILITIES CIP 9,936,301 (7,298,826) 2,637,475 2,800,000 (200,000) 2,600,000 2,400,000 (200,000) 2,200,000 3,037,475 3,037,475 317 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT 5,494,006 (1,762,520) 3,731,486 5,625,000 - 5,625,000 5,460,000 - 5,460,000 3,896,486 3,896,486 346 NEW FAMILY FIRST CENTER DEVELOPMENT 3,937,547 (3,937,547) - - - - - - - - - 402 AIRPORT OPERATIONS & CIP 6,721,411 (3,484,530) 3,236,881 4,903,287 - 4,903,287 4,539,908 21,554 4,561,462 3,578,706 (297,346) 3,281,359 403 SOLID WASTE UTILITY 3,513,550 27,672 3,541,223 27,217,815 1,000,000 28,217,815 28,235,332 1,007,084 29,242,416 2,516,622 (400,000) 2,116,622 404 GOLF COURSE SYSTEM & CAPITAL 1,898,055 (28,004) 1,870,050 4,803,170 - 4,803,170 4,724,709 16,998 4,741,707 1,931,513 (1,060,123) 871,391 405 WATER OPERATIONS & CAPITAL 24,666,731 7,450 24,674,180 19,878,544 - 19,878,544 18,738,537 38,397 18,776,935 25,775,790 (3,221,283) 22,554,507 406 WASTEWATER OPERATIONS & CAPITAL 12,583,378 23,875 12,607,253 13,042,313 - 13,042,313 12,288,335 24,815 12,313,150 13,336,417 (1,694,805) 11,641,612 407 SURFACE WATER OPERATIONS & CAPITAL 17,833,242 (130,688) 17,702,554 14,505,148 - 14,505,148 14,119,678 25,955 14,145,633 18,062,069 (2,076,264) 15,985,805 416 KING COUNTY METRO 7,647,811 - 7,647,811 23,791,462 1,200,000 24,991,462 23,791,462 1,200,000 24,991,462 7,647,811 (380,000) 7,267,811 501 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 15,152,837 (1,296,160) 13,856,677 6,771,008 - 6,771,008 6,842,794 400,000 7,242,794 13,384,891 (13,384,891) - 502 INSURANCE 26,091,818 692,368 26,784,185 6,073,908 1,500,000 7,573,908 8,471,547 (52,868) 8,418,679 25,939,414 (19,418,731) 6,520,683 503 INFORMATION SERVICES 5,511,683 (533,700) 4,977,982 10,071,742 (44,868) 10,026,875 9,848,853 67,582 9,916,435 5,088,422 (2,785,647) 2,302,774 504 FACILITIES 1,903,704 (330,695) 1,573,009 8,018,031 20,000 8,038,031 8,183,182 64,837 8,248,019 1,363,022 (163,563) 1,199,459 505 COMMUNICATIONS 779,556 (779,556) - - - - - - - - - 512 HEALTHCARE INSURANCE 10,006,774 - 10,006,774 17,682,747 - 17,682,747 18,202,177 - 18,202,177 9,487,344 (5,460,653) 4,026,690 522 LEOFF1 RETIREES HEALTHCARE 19,905,957 - 19,905,957 920,000 - 920,000 1,776,327 - 1,776,327 19,049,630 (19,049,630) - 611 FIREMENS PENSION 10,861,277 (50,000) 10,811,277 300,000 - 300,000 264,975 50,000 314,975 10,796,302 (10,796,302) - Total Other Funds 218,475,632 (25,572,296) 192,903,336 180,727,250 2,885,132 183,612,382 177,312,610 2,059,354 179,371,964 197,143,753 (82,896,402) 114,247,351 TOTAL ALL FUNDS 321,814,813 (30,299,209) 291,515,604 321,824,612 11,795,132 333,619,744 323,929,604 8,846,441 332,776,046 292,359,303 (103,804,892) 188,554,411 2 year total 707,548,058 64,410,665 771,958,723 837,638,279 76,520,979 914,159,258 292,359,303 (103,804,892) 188,554,411 CARRY FORWARD - CARRY FORWARD - NEW 11,795,132 NEW 8,846,441 2026 Adjustment By Fund H:\Finance\Budget\2025-2026 Budget\2.Budget Adjustments\03_2025.Mid.Bi\00MASTER_2025.Q3 Mid-Bi Budget Amendment AG E N D A I T E M # 2 . a ) 3.8% Grade Position Title Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Current FTE /Remov al Revised FTE 1 1 e10 Mayor (1) 18,094 217,128 18,094 217,128 1 1 e09 City Council President (2)(7) 6 6 e09 City Council Members (2) 2 2 e11 Municipal Court Judge (6) Salary established pursuant to RMC 3-10-2.E 1 1 m53 Chief Administrative Officer 16,390 196,680 17,226 206,712 18,094 217,128 19,008 228,096 19,960 239,520 1 1 m52 Police Chief (3) 15,988 191,856 16,798 201,576 17,655 211,860 18,549 222,588 19,476 233,712 m51 15,599 187,188 16,390 196,680 17,226 206,712 18,094 217,128 19,008 228,096 m50 15,217 182,604 15,988 191,856 16,798 201,576 17,655 211,860 18,549 222,588 1 1 m49 City Attorney 14,852 178,224 15,599 187,188 16,390 196,680 17,226 206,712 18,094 217,128 1 1 m49 Parks & Recreation Administrator 14,852 178,224 15,599 187,188 16,390 196,680 17,226 206,712 18,094 217,128 1 1 m49 Community & Economic Development Administrator 14,852 178,224 15,599 187,188 16,390 196,680 17,226 206,712 18,094 217,128 1 1 m49 Deputy Chief Administrative Officer 14,852 178,224 15,599 187,188 16,390 196,680 17,226 206,712 18,094 217,128 1 1 m49 Finance Administrator 14,852 178,224 15,599 187,188 16,390 196,680 17,226 206,712 18,094 217,128 1 1 m49 Human Resources & Risk Mgmt Administrator 14,852 178,224 15,599 187,188 16,390 196,680 17,226 206,712 18,094 217,128 1 1 m49 Judicial Administrative Officer 14,852 178,224 15,599 187,188 16,390 196,680 17,226 206,712 18,094 217,128 1 1 m49 Public Works Administrator 14,852 178,224 15,599 187,188 16,390 196,680 17,226 206,712 18,094 217,128 2 2 m48 Police Deputy Chief (4) 14,486 173,832 15,217 182,604 15,988 191,856 16,798 201,576 17,655 211,860 m47 14,134 169,608 14,852 178,224 15,599 187,188 16,390 196,680 17,226 206,712 1 1 m46 Prosecution Director 13,789 165,468 14,486 173,832 15,217 182,604 15,988 191,856 16,798 201,576 m45 13,454 161,448 14,134 169,608 14,852 178,224 15,599 187,188 16,390 196,680 m44 13,128 157,536 13,789 165,468 14,486 173,832 15,217 182,604 15,988 191,856 1 1 m43 Economic Development Director 12,803 153,636 13,454 161,448 14,134 169,608 14,852 178,224 15,599 187,188 6 6 m42 Police Commander (5) 12,492 149,904 13,128 157,536 13,789 165,468 14,486 173,832 15,217 182,604 3 3 m42 Sr Assistant City Attorney 12,492 149,904 13,128 157,536 13,789 165,468 14,486 173,832 15,217 182,604 1 1 m41 Finance Director 12,190 146,280 12,803 153,636 13,454 161,448 14,134 169,608 14,852 178,224 0 1 1 m41 Human Services Director 12,190 146,280 12,803 153,636 13,454 161,448 14,134 169,608 14,852 178,224 1 1 m41 Information Technology Director 12,190 146,280 12,803 153,636 13,454 161,448 14,134 169,608 14,852 178,224 1 1 m40 Airport Director 11,893 142,716 12,492 149,904 13,128 157,536 13,789 165,468 14,486 173,832 1 1 m40 Development Engineering Director 11,893 142,716 12,492 149,904 13,128 157,536 13,789 165,468 14,486 173,832 1 1 m40 Development Services Director 11,893 142,716 12,492 149,904 13,128 157,536 13,789 165,468 14,486 173,832 1 1 m40 Facilities Director 11,893 142,716 12,492 149,904 13,128 157,536 13,789 165,468 14,486 173,832 1 1 m40 Maintenance Services Director 11,893 142,716 12,492 149,904 13,128 157,536 13,789 165,468 14,486 173,832 1 1 m40 Planning Director 11,893 142,716 12,492 149,904 13,128 157,536 13,789 165,468 14,486 173,832 1 1 m40 Transportation Systems Director 11,893 142,716 12,492 149,904 13,128 157,536 13,789 165,468 14,486 173,832 1 1 m40 Utility Systems Director 11,893 142,716 12,492 149,904 13,128 157,536 13,789 165,468 14,486 173,832 m39 11,603 139,236 12,190 146,280 12,803 153,636 13,454 161,448 14,134 169,608 1 1 m38 City Clerk/Public Records Officer 11,320 135,840 11,893 142,716 12,492 149,904 13,128 157,536 13,789 165,468 1 1 m38 Communications and Engagement Director 11,320 135,840 11,893 142,716 12,492 149,904 13,128 157,536 13,789 165,468 1 1 m38 Emergency Management Director 11,320 135,840 11,893 142,716 12,492 149,904 13,128 157,536 13,789 165,468 1 1 m38 Enterprise Applications Manager 11,320 135,840 11,893 142,716 12,492 149,904 13,128 157,536 13,789 165,468 1 1 m38 HR Labor Relations & Compensation Manager 11,320 135,840 11,893 142,716 12,492 149,904 13,128 157,536 13,789 165,468 1 1 m38 Infrastructure & Security Manager 11,320 135,840 11,893 142,716 12,492 149,904 13,128 157,536 13,789 165,468 1 1 m38 Lead Prosecutor 11,320 135,840 11,893 142,716 12,492 149,904 13,128 157,536 13,789 165,468 1 1 m38 Parks and Trails Director 11,320 135,840 11,893 142,716 12,492 149,904 13,128 157,536 13,789 165,468 1 1 m38 Recreation Director 11,320 135,840 11,893 142,716 12,492 149,904 13,128 157,536 13,789 165,468 2025 CITY OF RENTON SALARY TABLE NON-REPRESENTED Wage Adjustment Revised May November 2025 STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E ELECTED OFFICIALS MANAGEMENT & SUPERVISORY (NON-UNION) Authorized Positions As established by the Independent Salary Commission pursuant to RMC 2-20 As established by the Independent Salary Commission pursuant to RMC 2-20 AGENDA ITEM #2. a) 3.8% Grade Position Title Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual 2025 CITY OF RENTON SALARY TABLE NON-REPRESENTED Wage Adjustment Revised May November 2025 STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E Authorized Positions 1 1 m37 ITS and Maintenance Manager 11,047 132,564 11,603 139,236 12,190 146,280 12,803 153,636 13,454 161,448 1 1 m37 Transportation Design Manager 11,047 132,564 11,603 139,236 12,190 146,280 12,803 153,636 13,454 161,448 1 1 m37 Transportation Operations Manager 11,047 132,564 11,603 139,236 12,190 146,280 12,803 153,636 13,454 161,448 1 1 m37 Transportation Planning Manager 11,047 132,564 11,603 139,236 12,190 146,280 12,803 153,636 13,454 161,448 3 3 m37 Utility Engineering Manager 11,047 132,564 11,603 139,236 12,190 146,280 12,803 153,636 13,454 161,448 1 1 m36 Budget & Accounting Manager 10,775 129,300 11,320 135,840 11,893 142,716 12,492 149,904 13,128 157,536 0 1 1 m36 Business Recruitment and Retention Manager 10,775 129,300 11,320 135,840 11,893 142,716 12,492 149,904 13,128 157,536 1 1 m36 Construction Engineering Manager 10,775 129,300 11,320 135,840 11,893 142,716 12,492 149,904 13,128 157,536 1 1 m36 Current Planning Manager 10,775 129,300 11,320 135,840 11,893 142,716 12,492 149,904 13,128 157,536 1 1 m36 Development Engineering Manager 10,775 129,300 11,320 135,840 11,893 142,716 12,492 149,904 13,128 157,536 1 -1 0 m36 Economic Development Assistant Director 10,775 129,300 11,320 135,840 11,893 142,716 12,492 149,904 13,128 157,536 1 1 m36 Financial Operations Manager 10,775 129,300 11,320 135,840 11,893 142,716 12,492 149,904 13,128 157,536 1 1 m36 Government Affairs Manager 10,775 129,300 11,320 135,840 11,893 142,716 12,492 149,904 13,128 157,536 1 1 m36 Long Range Planning Manager 10,775 129,300 11,320 135,840 11,893 142,716 12,492 149,904 13,128 157,536 1 1 m36 Redevelopment Manager 10,775 129,300 11,320 135,840 11,893 142,716 12,492 149,904 13,128 157,536 1 1 m35 Assistant City Attorney 10,510 126,120 11,047 132,564 11,603 139,236 12,190 146,280 12,803 153,636 1 1 m34 Asset Manager 10,249 122,988 10,775 129,300 11,320 135,840 11,893 142,716 12,492 149,904 0 1 1 m34 Assistant Building Official 10,249 122,988 10,775 129,300 11,320 135,840 11,893 142,716 12,492 149,904 1 1 m34 GIS & Data Manager 10,249 122,988 10,775 129,300 11,320 135,840 11,893 142,716 12,492 149,904 1 1 m34 Human Resources Benefits Manager 10,249 122,988 10,775 129,300 11,320 135,840 11,893 142,716 12,492 149,904 1 1 m34 Organizational Development Manager 10,249 122,988 10,775 129,300 11,320 135,840 11,893 142,716 12,492 149,904 1 1 m34 Risk Manager 10,249 122,988 10,775 129,300 11,320 135,840 11,893 142,716 12,492 149,904 1 1 m33 Sustainability & Solid Waste Manager 10,003 120,036 10,510 126,120 11,047 132,564 11,603 139,236 12,190 146,280 1 1 m33 Water Maintenance Manager 10,003 120,036 10,510 126,120 11,047 132,564 11,603 139,236 12,190 146,280 1 1 m32 Capital Projects Manager 9,758 117,096 10,249 122,988 10,775 129,300 11,320 135,840 11,893 142,716 0 1 1 m32 Code Compliance Manager 9,758 117,096 10,249 122,988 10,775 129,300 11,320 135,840 11,893 142,716 1 1 m32 Economic Development Manager 9,758 117,096 10,249 122,988 10,775 129,300 11,320 135,840 11,893 142,716 1 1 m32 Fleet Manager 9,758 117,096 10,249 122,988 10,775 129,300 11,320 135,840 11,893 142,716 1 1 m32 Human Services Manager 9,758 117,096 10,249 122,988 10,775 129,300 11,320 135,840 11,893 142,716 1 1 m32 Parks Planning & Trails Manager 9,758 117,096 10,249 122,988 10,775 129,300 11,320 135,840 11,893 142,716 1 1 m32 Street Maintenance Manager 9,758 117,096 10,249 122,988 10,775 129,300 11,320 135,840 11,893 142,716 1 1 m32 Urban Forestry and Natural Resources Manager 9,758 117,096 10,249 122,988 10,775 129,300 11,320 135,840 11,893 142,716 1 1 m32 Waste Water/Special Operations Manager 9,758 117,096 10,249 122,988 10,775 129,300 11,320 135,840 11,893 142,716 1 1 m31 Facilities Manager 9,523 114,276 10,003 120,036 10,510 126,120 11,047 132,564 11,603 139,236 1 1 m31 Parks Maintenance Manager 9,523 114,276 10,003 120,036 10,510 126,120 11,047 132,564 11,603 139,236 1 1 m30 Comms & Community Engagement Manager (PD) 9,290 111,480 9,758 117,096 10,249 122,988 10,775 129,300 11,320 135,840 1 1 m30 Police Manager 9,290 111,480 9,758 117,096 10,249 122,988 10,775 129,300 11,320 135,840 1 1 m29 Communications Manager 9,058 108,696 9,523 114,276 10,003 120,036 10,510 126,120 11,047 132,564 1 1 m29 Golf Course Manager 9,058 108,696 9,523 114,276 10,003 120,036 10,510 126,120 11,047 132,564 3 3 m29 Prosecuting Attorney 9,058 108,696 9,523 114,276 10,003 120,036 10,510 126,120 11,047 132,564 1 1 m29 Recreation Manager 9,058 108,696 9,523 114,276 10,003 120,036 10,510 126,120 11,047 132,564 1 1 m28 Permit Services Manager 8,845 106,140 9,290 111,480 9,758 117,096 10,249 122,988 10,775 129,300 1 1 m28 Tax & Licensing Manager 8,845 106,140 9,290 111,480 9,758 117,096 10,249 122,988 10,775 129,300 1 1 m27 Enterprise Content Manager 8,627 103,524 9,058 108,696 9,523 114,276 10,003 120,036 10,510 126,120 1 1 m27 Financial Operations Supervisor 8,627 103,524 9,058 108,696 9,523 114,276 10,003 120,036 10,510 126,120 1 1 m27 Senior Grants Analyst 8,627 103,524 9,058 108,696 9,523 114,276 10,003 120,036 10,510 126,120 1 1 m27 Museum Manager 8,627 103,524 9,058 108,696 9,523 114,276 10,003 120,036 10,510 126,120 1 1 m26 Chief of Staff 8,416 100,992 8,845 106,140 9,290 111,480 9,758 117,096 10,249 122,988 2 2 m25 Court Services Manager 8,212 98,544 8,627 103,524 9,058 108,696 9,523 114,276 10,003 120,036 1 1 m25 Head Golf Professional 8,212 98,544 8,627 103,524 9,058 108,696 9,523 114,276 10,003 120,036 2 2 m25 Senior Benefits Analyst 8,212 98,544 8,627 103,524 9,058 108,696 9,523 114,276 10,003 120,036 2 2 m25 Senior Employee Relations Analyst 8,212 98,544 8,627 103,524 9,058 108,696 9,523 114,276 10,003 120,036 7 7 m25 Senior Finance Analyst 8,212 98,544 8,627 103,524 9,058 108,696 9,523 114,276 10,003 120,036 1 1 m25 Senior Human Resources Analyst - DEI Workforce & Equity 8,212 98,544 8,627 103,524 9,058 108,696 9,523 114,276 10,003 120,036 1 1 m25 Senior Risk Management Analyst 8,212 98,544 8,627 103,524 9,058 108,696 9,523 114,276 10,003 120,036 1 1 m25 Solid Waste Program Manager 8,212 98,544 8,627 103,524 9,058 108,696 9,523 114,276 10,003 120,036 AGENDA ITEM #2. a) 3.8% Grade Position Title Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual 2025 CITY OF RENTON SALARY TABLE NON-REPRESENTED Wage Adjustment Revised May November 2025 STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E Authorized Positions 1 1 m24 Deputy City Clerk/Public Records Officer 8,015 96,180 8,416 100,992 8,845 106,140 9,290 111,480 9,758 117,096 0 0 m23 Benefits Analyst 7,811 93,732 8,212 98,544 8,627 103,524 9,058 108,696 9,523 114,276 1 1 m23 Employee Relations Analyst 7,811 93,732 8,212 98,544 8,627 103,524 9,058 108,696 9,523 114,276 4 4 m23 Recreation Supervisor 7,811 93,732 8,212 98,544 8,627 103,524 9,058 108,696 9,523 114,276 0 0 m23 Risk Management Analyst 7,811 93,732 8,212 98,544 8,627 103,524 9,058 108,696 9,523 114,276 1 1 m22 Community Events Coordinator 7,627 91,524 8,015 96,180 8,416 100,992 8,845 106,140 9,290 111,480 1 1 m22 Community Outreach Coordinator 7,627 91,524 8,015 96,180 8,416 100,992 8,845 106,140 9,290 111,480 1 1 m22 Golf Course Supervisor 7,627 91,524 8,015 96,180 8,416 100,992 8,845 106,140 9,290 111,480 1 1 m22 Parks & Recreation Program Coordinator 7,627 91,524 8,015 96,180 8,416 100,992 8,845 106,140 9,290 111,480 1 1 m21 Executive Assistant 7,438 89,256 7,811 93,732 8,212 98,544 8,627 103,524 9,058 108,696 1 1 m21 Senior Tax & Licensing Auditor 7,438 89,256 7,811 93,732 8,212 98,544 8,627 103,524 9,058 108,696 m20 7,257 87,084 7,627 91,524 8,015 96,180 8,416 100,992 8,845 106,140 m19 7,083 84,996 7,438 89,256 7,811 93,732 8,212 98,544 8,627 103,524 2 2 m18 Payroll Technician 3 6,905 82,860 7,257 87,084 7,627 91,524 8,015 96,180 8,416 100,992 1 1 m17 Legal Analyst 6,742 80,904 7,083 84,996 7,438 89,256 7,811 93,732 8,212 98,544 7 7 n16 Administrative Assistants (All Depts) 6,550 78,600 6,880 82,560 7,217 86,604 7,589 91,068 7,968 95,616 0 0 n16 Finance Analyst 3 6,550 78,600 6,880 82,560 7,217 86,604 7,589 91,068 7,968 95,616 1 1 n16 Tax & Licensing Auditor 2 6,550 78,600 6,880 82,560 7,217 86,604 7,589 91,068 7,968 95,616 n15 6,380 76,560 6,709 80,508 7,046 84,552 7,404 88,848 7,783 93,396 n14 6,229 74,748 6,550 78,600 6,880 82,560 7,217 86,604 7,589 91,068 0 0 n13 Finance Analyst 2 6,075 72,900 6,380 76,560 6,709 80,508 7,046 84,552 7,404 88,848 2 2 n13 Human Resources Specialist 6,075 72,900 6,380 76,560 6,709 80,508 7,046 84,552 7,404 88,848 0 0 n13 Payroll Technician 2 6,075 72,900 6,380 76,560 6,709 80,508 7,046 84,552 7,404 88,848 0 0 n13 Tax & Licensing Auditor 1 6,075 72,900 6,380 76,560 6,709 80,508 7,046 84,552 7,404 88,848 n12 5,933 71,196 6,229 74,748 6,550 78,600 6,880 82,560 7,217 86,604 1 1 n11 Assistant Golf Professional 5,784 69,408 6,075 72,900 6,380 76,560 6,709 80,508 7,046 84,552 0 0 n10 Finance Analyst 1 5,645 67,740 5,933 71,196 6,229 74,748 6,550 78,600 6,880 82,560 0 0 n10 Payroll Technician 1 5,645 67,740 5,933 71,196 6,229 74,748 6,550 78,600 6,880 82,560 n09 5,511 66,132 5,784 69,408 6,075 72,900 6,380 76,560 6,709 80,508 n08 5,372 64,464 5,645 67,740 5,933 71,196 6,229 74,748 6,550 78,600 n07 5,242 62,904 5,511 66,132 5,784 69,408 6,075 72,900 6,380 76,560 n06 5,112 61,344 5,372 64,464 5,645 67,740 5,933 71,196 6,229 74,748 n05 4,989 59,868 5,242 62,904 5,511 66,132 5,784 69,408 6,075 72,900 n04 4,869 58,428 5,112 61,344 5,372 64,464 5,645 67,740 5,933 71,196 n03 4,755 57,060 4,989 59,868 5,242 62,904 5,511 66,132 5,784 69,408 n02 4,639 55,668 4,869 58,428 5,112 61,344 5,372 64,464 5,645 67,740 1 1 n01 Office Specialist 4,532 54,384 4,755 57,060 4,989 59,868 5,242 62,904 5,511 66,132 NON-UNION (CLERICAL, OTHER) AGENDA ITEM #2. a) 3.8% Grade Position Title Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual 2025 CITY OF RENTON SALARY TABLE NON-REPRESENTED Wage Adjustment Revised May November 2025 STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E Authorized Positions 145 3148 $7,524 Completion of 5 Yrs Completion of 10 Yrs Completion of 15 Yrs Completion of 20 Yrs Completion of 25 Yrs Completion of 30 Yrs (1) In addition to salary receives annual car allowance of $4800 or use of a city vehicle. Not eligible for longevity. (2) (3) Eligible for Longevity at the Non-Represented Longevity pay scale. Not eligible for Education or Uniform Allowance. (4) Eligible for Longevity at the Non-Represented Longevity pay scale and Education Premium. Not eligible for Uniform Allowance. Eligible for 3% cash premium or 3% into deferred compensation per employee's discretion for passing physical fitness. (5)Receive Education/Longevity & Uniform Allowance based on Union Contract. Eligible for 3% deferred compensation for passing physical fitness. Eligible for P2 paid job injury leave based on Union Contract. (6) 4 year term. Not eligible for longevity. (7) Council president to be paid $300/month above council members salary. 2% Step a14E $150 per month NON-REPRESENTED LONGEVITY PAY The city contributes 4% of employee's base wage per year to a deferred compensation account Step a14, E = 3% Step a14E $226 per month 4% Step a14E $301 per month for Management and Non-Represented employees; except for CAO receives 11% per year. 5% Step a14E $376 per month 6% Step a14E $451 per month 7% Step a14E $527 per month Council members salary set per Independent Salary Commission pursuant to Chapter 2-20 RMC. Council receives 2% of salary for deferred comp. If members are prohibited from participating in PERS, they receive an extra 1.4 % of salary for deferred compensation. Not eligible for longevity. AGENDA ITEM #2. a) Wage Adjustment 3.8% Revised 8/xx/202 Grade Position Title Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual a40 11,711 140,532 12,295 147,540 12,919 155,028 13,575 162,900 14,260 171,120 a39 11,445 137,340 12,013 144,156 12,602 151,224 13,243 158,916 13,913 166,956 a38 11,153 133,836 11,711 140,532 12,295 147,540 12,919 155,028 13,575 162,900 5 5 a37 Principal Civil Engineer 10,897 130,764 11,445 137,340 12,013 144,156 12,602 151,224 13,243 158,916 a36 10,621 127,452 11,153 133,836 11,711 140,532 12,295 147,540 12,919 155,028 a35 10,367 124,404 10,897 130,764 11,445 137,340 12,013 144,156 12,602 151,224 1 1 a34 Structural Plans Examiner 10,113 121,356 10,621 127,452 11,153 133,836 11,711 140,532 12,295 147,540 19 19 a33 Civil Engineer 3 9,869 118,428 10,367 124,404 10,897 130,764 11,445 137,340 12,013 144,156 11a32Assistant Airport Manager Airport Operations Manager 9,631 115,572 10,113 121,356 10,621 127,452 11,153 133,836 11,711 140,532 2 2 a32 Principal Planner 9,631 115,572 10,113 121,356 10,621 127,452 11,153 133,836 11,711 140,532 1 1 a31 Client Technology Sys & Support Super 9,388 112,656 9,869 118,428 10,367 124,404 10,897 130,764 11,445 137,340 5 5 a30 Civil Engineer 2 9,163 109,956 9,631 115,572 10,113 121,356 10,621 127,452 11,153 133,836 2 2 a30 Senior Systems Analyst 9,163 109,956 9,631 115,572 10,113 121,356 10,621 127,452 11,153 133,836 4 4 a29 Capital Projects Coordinator 8,940 107,280 9,388 112,656 9,869 118,428 10,367 124,404 10,897 130,764 1 1 a29 ITS & Signal Maintenance Supervisor 8,940 107,280 9,388 112,656 9,869 118,428 10,367 124,404 10,897 130,764 1 1 a29 Network & Security Engineer 2 8,940 107,280 9,388 112,656 9,869 118,428 10,367 124,404 10,897 130,764 1 1 a29 Program Development Coordinator 2 8,940 107,280 9,388 112,656 9,869 118,428 10,367 124,404 10,897 130,764 2 2 a29 Senior Network Systems Specialist 8,940 107,280 9,388 112,656 9,869 118,428 10,367 124,404 10,897 130,764 2 2 a29 Senior Planner 8,940 107,280 9,388 112,656 9,869 118,428 10,367 124,404 10,897 130,764 4 4 a28 Senior Business Systems Analyst 8,719 104,628 9,163 109,956 9,631 115,572 10,113 121,356 10,621 127,452 1 1 a28 Transportation Planner 8,719 104,628 9,163 109,956 9,631 115,572 10,113 121,356 10,621 127,452 1 1 a28 Water Treatment Operations Supervisor 8,719 104,628 9,163 109,956 9,631 115,572 10,113 121,356 10,621 127,452 6 6 a27 GIS Analyst 3 8,508 102,096 8,940 107,280 9,388 112,656 9,869 118,428 10,367 124,404 0 0 a27 Systems Analyst 8,508 102,096 8,940 107,280 9,388 112,656 9,869 118,428 10,367 124,404 0 0 a26 Civil Engineer 1 8,298 99,576 8,719 104,628 9,163 109,956 9,631 115,572 10,113 121,356 1 1 a26 Facilities Coordinator 8,298 99,576 8,719 104,628 9,163 109,956 9,631 115,572 10,113 121,356 1 1 a26 Lead Building Inspector 8,298 99,576 8,719 104,628 9,163 109,956 9,631 115,572 10,113 121,356 1 1 a26 Lead Code Compliance Inspector 8,298 99,576 8,719 104,628 9,163 109,956 9,631 115,572 10,113 121,356 1 1 a26 Lead Construction Engineering Inspector 8,298 99,576 8,719 104,628 9,163 109,956 9,631 115,572 10,113 121,356 1 1 a26 Lead Electrical/Ctrl Systems Technician 8,298 99,576 8,719 104,628 9,163 109,956 9,631 115,572 10,113 121,356 1 1 a26 Neighborhood Program Coordinator 8,298 99,576 8,719 104,628 9,163 109,956 9,631 115,572 10,113 121,356 0 0 a26 Program Development Coordinator 1 8,298 99,576 8,719 104,628 9,163 109,956 9,631 115,572 10,113 121,356 0 0 a25 Network & Security Engineer 1 8,096 97,152 8,508 102,096 8,940 107,280 9,388 112,656 9,869 118,428 1 1 a25 Network Systems Specialist 8,096 97,152 8,508 102,096 8,940 107,280 9,388 112,656 9,869 118,428 1 1 a25 Senior Economic Development Specialist 8,096 97,152 8,508 102,096 8,940 107,280 9,388 112,656 9,869 118,428 1 1 a24 Airport Ops & Maintenance Supervisor 7,901 94,812 8,298 99,576 8,719 104,628 9,163 109,956 9,631 115,572 2 2 a24 Building Plan Reviewer 7,901 94,812 8,298 99,576 8,719 104,628 9,163 109,956 9,631 115,572 0 0 a24 Business Systems Analyst 7,901 94,812 8,298 99,576 8,719 104,628 9,163 109,956 9,631 115,572 6 6 a24 Engineering Specialist 3 7,901 94,812 8,298 99,576 8,719 104,628 9,163 109,956 9,631 115,572 1 1 a24 GIS Analyst 2 7,901 94,812 8,298 99,576 8,719 104,628 9,163 109,956 9,631 115,572 1 1 a24 Property Services Specialist 7,901 94,812 8,298 99,576 8,719 104,628 9,163 109,956 9,631 115,572 1 1 a24 Street Maintenance Services Supervisor 7,901 94,812 8,298 99,576 8,719 104,628 9,163 109,956 9,631 115,572 2 2 a24 Waste Water Maint. Services Supervisor 7,901 94,812 8,298 99,576 8,719 104,628 9,163 109,956 9,631 115,572 1 1 a24 Water Maintenance Services Supervisor 7,901 94,812 8,298 99,576 8,719 104,628 9,163 109,956 9,631 115,572 Revised FTE STEP D STEP E Effective 1/1/2025 (revised July 2025) Revised November 2025 2025 CITY OF RENTON SALARY TABLE STEP A STEP B STEP C Authorized Positions AFSCME, Local 2170 Current FTE Addition/ Removal AGENDA ITEM #2. a) Wage Adjustment 3.8% Revised 8/xx/202 Grade Position Title Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Revised FTE STEP D STEP E Effective 1/1/2025 (revised July 2025) Revised November 2025 2025 CITY OF RENTON SALARY TABLE STEP A STEP B STEP C Authorized Positions AFSCME, Local 2170 Current FTE Addition/ Removal 1 1 a23 Client Technology Services Specialist 3 7,710 92,520 8,096 97,152 8,508 102,096 8,940 107,280 9,388 112,656 2 2 a23 Custodial Maintenance Supervisor 7,710 92,520 8,096 97,152 8,508 102,096 8,940 107,280 9,388 112,656 1 1 a23 Data Analyst 7,710 92,520 8,096 97,152 8,508 102,096 8,940 107,280 9,388 112,656 2 2 a23 Emergency Management Coordinator 7,710 92,520 8,096 97,152 8,508 102,096 8,940 107,280 9,388 112,656 1 1 a23 Facilities Supervisor 7,710 92,520 8,096 97,152 8,508 102,096 8,940 107,280 9,388 112,656 1 1 a23 Housing Repair Coordinator 7,710 92,520 8,096 97,152 8,508 102,096 8,940 107,280 9,388 112,656 1 1 a23 Pavement Management Technician 7,710 92,520 8,096 97,152 8,508 102,096 8,940 107,280 9,388 112,656 0 0 a23 Plan Reviewer 7,710 92,520 8,096 97,152 8,508 102,096 8,940 107,280 9,388 112,656 0 0 a23 Senior Paralegal 7,710 92,520 8,096 97,152 8,508 102,096 8,940 107,280 9,388 112,656 4 4 a23 Signal & ITS Technician 3 7,710 92,520 8,096 97,152 8,508 102,096 8,940 107,280 9,388 112,656 1 1 a23 Utility Accounts Supervisor 7,710 92,520 8,096 97,152 8,508 102,096 8,940 107,280 9,388 112,656 6 6 a22 Associate Planner 7,524 90,288 7,901 94,812 8,298 99,576 8,719 104,628 9,163 109,956 2 2 a22 Building Inspector/Combination 7,524 90,288 7,901 94,812 8,298 99,576 8,719 104,628 9,163 109,956 3 3 a22 Building Inspector/Electrical 7,524 90,288 7,901 94,812 8,298 99,576 8,719 104,628 9,163 109,956 2 2 a22 Case Manager 7,524 90,288 7,901 94,812 8,298 99,576 8,719 104,628 9,163 109,956 4 4 a22 Code Compliance Inspector 7,524 90,288 7,901 94,812 8,298 99,576 8,719 104,628 9,163 109,956 1 1 a22 Communications Specialist 2 7,524 90,288 7,901 94,812 8,298 99,576 8,719 104,628 9,163 109,956 7 7 a22 Construction Engineering Inspector 7,524 90,288 7,901 94,812 8,298 99,576 8,719 104,628 9,163 109,956 0 0 a22 GIS Analyst 1 7,524 90,288 7,901 94,812 8,298 99,576 8,719 104,628 9,163 109,956 2 2 a22 Parks Maintenance Supervisor 7,524 90,288 7,901 94,812 8,298 99,576 8,719 104,628 9,163 109,956 1 1 a22 Water Meter Tech. Services Supervisor 7,524 90,288 7,901 94,812 8,298 99,576 8,719 104,628 9,163 109,956 1 1 a21 Business Coordinator - Airport 7,335 88,020 7,710 92,520 8,096 97,152 8,508 102,096 8,940 107,280 1 1 a21 Human Services Coordinator 7,335 88,020 7,710 92,520 8,096 97,152 8,508 102,096 8,940 107,280 1 1 a21 Lead Vehicle & Equipment Mechanic 7,335 88,020 7,710 92,520 8,096 97,152 8,508 102,096 8,940 107,280 1 1 a21 Public Records Analyst 7,335 88,020 7,710 92,520 8,096 97,152 8,508 102,096 8,940 107,280 1 1 a21 Traffic Signage & Marking Supervisor 7,335 88,020 7,710 92,520 8,096 97,152 8,508 102,096 8,940 107,280 1 1 a21 SCADA/Telemetry Technician 7,335 88,020 7,710 92,520 8,096 97,152 8,508 102,096 8,940 107,280 1 1 a20 Client Technology Services Specialist 2 7,156 85,872 7,524 90,288 7,901 94,812 8,298 99,576 8,719 104,628 1 1 a20 Economic Development Specialist 7,156 85,872 7,524 90,288 7,901 94,812 8,298 99,576 8,719 104,628 1 1 a20 Engineering Specialist 2 7,156 85,872 7,524 90,288 7,901 94,812 8,298 99,576 8,719 104,628 1 1 a20 Enterprise Content Specialist 2 7,156 85,872 7,524 90,288 7,901 94,812 8,298 99,576 8,719 104,628 1 1 a20 Inspecting Arborist 7,156 85,872 7,524 90,288 7,901 94,812 8,298 99,576 8,719 104,628 1 1 a20 Senior Program Specialist 7,156 85,872 7,524 90,288 7,901 94,812 8,298 99,576 8,719 104,628 1 1 a19 Electrical Technician 6,981 83,772 7,335 88,020 7,710 92,520 8,096 97,152 8,508 102,096 1 1 a19 Encampment Clean-Up Lead 6,981 83,772 7,335 88,020 7,710 92,520 8,096 97,152 8,508 102,096 1 1 a19 Farmers Market Coordinator 6,981 83,772 7,335 88,020 7,710 92,520 8,096 97,152 8,508 102,096 1 1 a19 HVAC Systems Technician 6,981 83,772 7,335 88,020 7,710 92,520 8,096 97,152 8,508 102,096 7 7 a19 Recreation Program Coordinator 6,981 83,772 7,335 88,020 7,710 92,520 8,096 97,152 8,508 102,096 3 3 a19 Senior Sustainability Specialist 6,981 83,772 7,335 88,020 7,710 92,520 8,096 97,152 8,508 102,096 0 0 a19 Signal & ITS Technician 2 6,981 83,772 7,335 88,020 7,710 92,520 8,096 97,152 8,508 102,096 4 4 a19 Water Treatment Plant Operator 6,981 83,772 7,335 88,020 7,710 92,520 8,096 97,152 8,508 102,096 1 1 a18 Assistant Planner 6,817 81,804 7,156 85,872 7,524 90,288 7,901 94,812 8,298 99,576 0 0 a18 Development Services Representative 6,817 81,804 7,156 85,872 7,524 90,288 7,901 94,812 8,298 99,576 1 1 a18 Lead Golf Course Maintenance Worker 6,817 81,804 7,156 85,872 7,524 90,288 7,901 94,812 8,298 99,576 7 7 a18 Lead Maintenance Services Worker 6,817 81,804 7,156 85,872 7,524 90,288 7,901 94,812 8,298 99,576 2 2 a18 Lead Parks Maintenance Worker 6,817 81,804 7,156 85,872 7,524 90,288 7,901 94,812 8,298 99,576 1 1 a18 Maintenance Buyer 6,817 81,804 7,156 85,872 7,524 90,288 7,901 94,812 8,298 99,576 4 4 a18 Paralegal 6,817 81,804 7,156 85,872 7,524 90,288 7,901 94,812 8,298 99,576 1 1 a18 Water Utility Maintenance Technician 6,817 81,804 7,156 85,872 7,524 90,288 7,901 94,812 8,298 99,576 1 1 a17 Digital Communications Specialist 6,646 79,752 6,981 83,772 7,335 88,020 7,710 92,520 8,096 97,152 2 2 a17 Lift Station Technician 6,646 79,752 6,981 83,772 7,335 88,020 7,710 92,520 8,096 97,152 0.75 0.75 a17 Program Assistant 6,646 79,752 6,981 83,772 7,335 88,020 7,710 92,520 8,096 97,152 1 1 a17 Public Records Specialist 6,646 79,752 6,981 83,772 7,335 88,020 7,710 92,520 8,096 97,152 1 1 a17 Senior Traffic Maintenance Worker 6,646 79,752 6,981 83,772 7,335 88,020 7,710 92,520 8,096 97,152 0.5 0.5 a17 Sustainability Specialist 6,646 79,752 6,981 83,772 7,335 88,020 7,710 92,520 8,096 97,152 0 0 a17 Water Treatment Plant Operator Trainee 6,646 79,752 6,981 83,772 7,335 88,020 7,710 92,520 8,096 97,152 AGENDA ITEM #2. a) Wage Adjustment 3.8% Revised 8/xx/202 Grade Position Title Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Revised FTE STEP D STEP E Effective 1/1/2025 (revised July 2025) Revised November 2025 2025 CITY OF RENTON SALARY TABLE STEP A STEP B STEP C Authorized Positions AFSCME, Local 2170 Current FTE Addition/ Removal 2 2 a16 City Clerk Specialist 2 6,491 77,892 6,817 81,804 7,156 85,872 7,524 90,288 7,901 94,812 2 2 a16 Client Technology Services Specialist 1 6,491 77,892 6,817 81,804 7,156 85,872 7,524 90,288 7,901 94,812 1 1 a16 Court Operations Specialist 6,491 77,892 6,817 81,804 7,156 85,872 7,524 90,288 7,901 94,812 0 0 a16 Enterprise Content Specialist 1 6,491 77,892 6,817 81,804 7,156 85,872 7,524 90,288 7,901 94,812 2 2 a16 Facilities Technician 2 6,491 77,892 6,817 81,804 7,156 85,872 7,524 90,288 7,901 94,812 0.75 0.75 a16 Recreation Specialist 6,491 77,892 6,817 81,804 7,156 85,872 7,524 90,288 7,901 94,812 5 5 a16 Vehicle & Equipment Mechanic 2 6,491 77,892 6,817 81,804 7,156 85,872 7,524 90,288 7,901 94,812 1 1 a15 Airport Operations Specialist 6,323 75,876 6,646 79,752 6,981 83,772 7,335 88,020 7,710 92,520 1 1 a15 Asset Management Systems Technician 6,323 75,876 6,646 79,752 6,981 83,772 7,335 88,020 7,710 92,520 1 1 a15 Communications Specialist 1 6,323 75,876 6,646 79,752 6,981 83,772 7,335 88,020 7,710 92,520 1 1 a15 Grounds Equipment Mechanic 6,323 75,876 6,646 79,752 6,981 83,772 7,335 88,020 7,710 92,520 1 1 a15 Housing Maintenance Technician 6,323 75,876 6,646 79,752 6,981 83,772 7,335 88,020 7,710 92,520 4 4 a15 Planning Technician 6,323 75,876 6,646 79,752 6,981 83,772 7,335 88,020 7,710 92,520 1 1 a15 Signal & ITS Technician 1 6,323 75,876 6,646 79,752 6,981 83,772 7,335 88,020 7,710 92,520 0 1 1 a14 Engineering Specialist 1 6,174 74,088 6,491 77,892 6,817 81,804 7,156 85,872 7,524 90,288 4 4 a14 Facilities Technician 1 6,174 74,088 6,491 77,892 6,817 81,804 7,156 85,872 7,524 90,288 1 1 a14 Golf Course Maintenance Worker 3 6,174 74,088 6,491 77,892 6,817 81,804 7,156 85,872 7,524 90,288 26 26 a14 Maintenance Services Worker 3 6,174 74,088 6,491 77,892 6,817 81,804 7,156 85,872 7,524 90,288 12 12 a14 Parks Maintenance Worker 3 6,174 74,088 6,491 77,892 6,817 81,804 7,156 85,872 7,524 90,288 3 3 a14 Permit Services Specialist 6,174 74,088 6,491 77,892 6,817 81,804 7,156 85,872 7,524 90,288 1 1 a14 Print & Mail Supervisor 6,174 74,088 6,491 77,892 6,817 81,804 7,156 85,872 7,524 90,288 0 0 a14 Program Specialist 6,174 74,088 6,491 77,892 6,817 81,804 7,156 85,872 7,524 90,288 1 1 a14 Recreation Systems Technician 6,174 74,088 6,491 77,892 6,817 81,804 7,156 85,872 7,524 90,288 3 3 a14 Traffic Maintenance Worker 2 6,174 74,088 6,491 77,892 6,817 81,804 7,156 85,872 7,524 90,288 3 3 a13 Judicial Specialist 2 6,021 72,252 6,323 75,876 6,646 79,752 6,981 83,772 7,335 88,020 3 3 a12 Airport Maintenance Worker 5,878 70,536 6,174 74,088 6,491 77,892 6,817 81,804 7,156 85,872 0 0 a12 City Clerk Specialist 1 5,878 70,536 6,174 74,088 6,491 77,892 6,817 81,804 7,156 85,872 00a12Vehicle & Equipment Mechanic 1 5,878 70,536 6,174 74,088 6,491 77,892 6,817 81,804 7,156 85,872 1 1 a12 Water Meter System Specialist 5,878 70,536 6,174 74,088 6,491 77,892 6,817 81,804 7,156 85,872 2 2 a11 Encampment Clean-Up Worker 5,733 68,796 6,021 72,252 6,323 75,876 6,646 79,752 6,981 83,772 1 1 a11 Fleet Management Technician 5,733 68,796 6,021 72,252 6,323 75,876 6,646 79,752 6,981 83,772 1 1 a11 IT Procurement & Contract Coordinator 5,733 68,796 6,021 72,252 6,323 75,876 6,646 79,752 6,981 83,772 2 2 a11 Lead Maintenance Custodian 5,733 68,796 6,021 72,252 6,323 75,876 6,646 79,752 6,981 83,772 2 2 a11 Legal Assistant 5,733 68,796 6,021 72,252 6,323 75,876 6,646 79,752 6,981 83,772 7 7 a10 Accounting Assistant 4 5,593 67,116 5,878 70,536 6,174 74,088 6,491 77,892 6,817 81,804 15 -1 14 a10 Administrative Secretary 1 5,593 67,116 5,878 70,536 6,174 74,088 6,491 77,892 6,817 81,804 1 1 a10 Golf Course Maintenance Worker 2 5,593 67,116 5,878 70,536 6,174 74,088 6,491 77,892 6,817 81,804 1 1 a10 Golf Course Operations Assistant 5,593 67,116 5,878 70,536 6,174 74,088 6,491 77,892 6,817 81,804 23 23 a10 Maintenance Services Worker 2 5,593 67,116 5,878 70,536 6,174 74,088 6,491 77,892 6,817 81,804 6 6 a10 Parks Maintenance Worker 2 5,593 67,116 5,878 70,536 6,174 74,088 6,491 77,892 6,817 81,804 3 3 a10 Recreation Assistant 5,593 67,116 5,878 70,536 6,174 74,088 6,491 77,892 6,817 81,804 0 0 a10 Traffic Maintenance Worker 1 5,593 67,116 5,878 70,536 6,174 74,088 6,491 77,892 6,817 81,804 5 5 a09 Judicial Specialist 1 5,456 65,472 5,733 68,796 6,021 72,252 6,323 75,876 6,646 79,752 1 1 a09 Purchasing Assistant 5,456 65,472 5,733 68,796 6,021 72,252 6,323 75,876 6,646 79,752 1 1 a08 Accounting Assistant 3 5,324 63,888 5,593 67,116 5,878 70,536 6,174 74,088 6,491 77,892 1 1 a08 Court Security Officer 5,324 63,888 5,593 67,116 5,878 70,536 6,174 74,088 6,491 77,892 3 3 a08 Maintenance Custodian 5,324 63,888 5,593 67,116 5,878 70,536 6,174 74,088 6,491 77,892 2 2 a08 Secretary 2 5,324 63,888 5,593 67,116 5,878 70,536 6,174 74,088 6,491 77,892 2 2 a08 Water Meter Technician 5,324 63,888 5,593 67,116 5,878 70,536 6,174 74,088 6,491 77,892 4 4 a07 Maintenance Services Worker 1 5,195 62,340 5,456 65,472 5,733 68,796 6,021 72,252 6,323 75,876 AGENDA ITEM #2. a) Wage Adjustment 3.8% Revised 8/xx/202 Grade Position Title Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Revised FTE STEP D STEP E Effective 1/1/2025 (revised July 2025) Revised November 2025 2025 CITY OF RENTON SALARY TABLE STEP A STEP B STEP C Authorized Positions AFSCME, Local 2170 Current FTE Addition/ Removal 0 0 a06 Accounting Assistant 2 5,073 60,876 5,324 63,888 5,593 67,116 5,878 70,536 6,174 74,088 0 0 a06 Golf Course Maintenance Worker 1 5,073 60,876 5,324 63,888 5,593 67,116 5,878 70,536 6,174 74,088 2 2 a06 Parks Maintenance Worker 1 5,073 60,876 5,324 63,888 5,593 67,116 5,878 70,536 6,174 74,088 a05 4,946 59,352 5,195 62,340 5,456 65,472 5,733 68,796 6,021 72,252 0 0 a04 Accounting Assistant 1 4,828 57,936 5,073 60,876 5,324 63,888 5,593 67,116 5,878 70,536 6 6 a04 Parks Maintenance Assistant 4,828 57,936 5,073 60,876 5,324 63,888 5,593 67,116 5,878 70,536 1 1 a04 Print & Mail Assistant 4,828 57,936 5,073 60,876 5,324 63,888 5,593 67,116 5,878 70,536 2 2 a04 Pro Shop Assistant 4,828 57,936 5,073 60,876 5,324 63,888 5,593 67,116 5,878 70,536 1 1 a03 Golf Course Associate 4,709 56,508 4,946 59,352 5,195 62,340 5,456 65,472 5,733 68,796 13 13 a02 Custodian 4,604 55,248 4,828 57,936 5,073 60,876 5,324 63,888 5,593 67,116 a01 4,483 53,796 4,709 56,508 4,946 59,352 5,195 62,340 5,456 65,472 366 0 366 $7,524 Completion of 5 Yrs Completion of 10 Yrs Completion of 15 Yrs Completion of 20 Yrs Completion of 25 Yrs Completion of 30 Yrs 5% Step a14E $376 3% Step a14E $226 per month 4% Step a14E $301 per month per month 2% Step a14E $150 per month Step a14, E = LONGEVITY PAY - The city contributes 1% of employee's base wage per year to a VEBA account. (Article 12.3 of AFSCME CBA) - The city contributes 3% of employee's base wage per year to a deferred compensation account. (Article 14 of Agreement By and Between City of Renton and Local 2170, Washington State Council of County and City Employees, American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees) 6% Step a14E $451 per month 7% Step a14E $527 per month AGENDA ITEM #2. a) 4.0% Grade Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Police Chief Police Deputy Chief Police Commander 17 17 pc61 Sergeant*11,858 142,299 12,807 153,684 (15% over Police Officer 2)*Step increase at 12 months 111 111 pc60 8,357 100,288 9,016 108,192 9,661 115,938 10,313 123,755 pc59 7,866 94,398 8,485 101,821 9,093 109,114 9,705 116,466 128 0 128 Percent Interpreters -----------------------------3% Detectives -------------------------------3% Traffic Assignment---------------------3% Motorcycle Assignment------------------- 2% Background Investigator--------------- 3% Canine Officer --------------------------4% Corporal Assignment -----------------7.5% Field Training Officer -----------------3% 8% when assigned student(s) Training Officer-------------------------3% SWAT Assignment -------------------- 4% SRO Assignment------------------------3% Civil Disturbance Paid at rate of double time with 3 hrs Unit ---------------------------------------minimum when called to an emergency. Special Weapons and Tactics------------------------------ Negotiator--------------------------------4% SET/DET-----------------------------------3% VIIT-----------------------------------------2%* VIIT Lead------------------------------------- 4%* STEP D STEP E Authorized 2025 CITY OF RENTON SALARY TABLE Wage AdjustmentEffective January 1 2025 POLICE DEPARTMENT - Commissioned Officers STEP A STEP B STEP CCurren t FTE Addition /Remov Revised FTE Paid at rate of time and one half with a *In addition to a paid rate of time and one half with 3 hr minimum when called out. Position Title HAZARD DUTY AND PREMIUM PAY (Article 6.7 and 6.8) Frozen Frozen ( Schedule) (6.25% over Police Officer 1) minimum when called to an Police Officer 1 (Newly Hired 2080 Hours) See Management & Supervisory Matrix, Grade m52 See Management & Supervisory Matrix, Grade m48 See Management & Supervisory Matrix, Grade m42 AGENDA ITEM #2. a) Percentage (of base wage) Percentage (of base wage) - - - 6% The city contributes 1% of employee's wage base toward deferred compensation. (Appendix A.2.2 of Agreement By and Between City of Renton and Renton Police Guild Representing Commissioned Employees (January 1, 2024- December 31, 2026) (Commissioned Guild CBA)) BA Degree/Masters Degree AA Degree (90 credits) MONTHLY LONGEVITY PAY (Appendix B) Years of Service Completion of 5 Yrs 2% NOTE: Please refer to the current labor agreement for specific information. Completion of 10 Yrs 4% Completion of 15 Yrs 6% Completion of 20 Yrs 10% Completion of 25 Yrs 12% Completion of 30 Yrs 14% MONTHLY EDUCATIONAL INCENTIVE PAY (Appendix B) 4% The city contributes 3% of employee's wage base toward deferred compensation for passing physical fitness. (Article 6.8.4, and Appendix A.2.3 of Commissioned Guild CBA) Effective January 1, 2025, the city contributes 3% of employee's wage base to a VEBA plan. (Article 14.10 of Commissioned Guild CBA) AGENDA ITEM #2. a) 4.0% Grade Position Title Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual pn70 7,376 88,512 7,974 95,688 8,762 105,144 9,628 115,536 10,135 121,620 pn69 7,195 86,340 7,778 93,336 8,548 102,576 9,394 112,728 9,887 118,644 pn68 7,020 84,240 7,590 91,080 8,340 100,080 9,164 109,968 9,647 115,764 33pn67Community Engagement Coord.6,849 82,188 7,405 88,860 8,137 97,644 8,940 107,280 9,411 112,932 pn66 6,681 80,172 7,224 86,688 7,937 95,244 8,722 104,664 9,180 110,160 pn65 6,518 78,216 7,047 84,564 7,745 92,940 8,510 102,120 8,958 107,496 11pn64Crime Analyst 6,498 77,976 7,021 84,252 7,713 92,556 8,315 99,780 8,731 104,772 pn63 6,205 74,460 6,708 80,496 7,369 88,428 8,100 97,200 8,526 102,312 2 2 pn62 Police Services Specialist 8,556 102,672 (15% above Specialist, Step E) 2 2 pn61 Electronic Home Detention 6,048 72,576 6,526 78,312 7,186 86,232 7,901 94,812 8,294 99,528 pn60 6,130 73,560 6,624 79,488 7,276 87,312 7,844 94,128 8,237 98,844 1 1 pn59 Domestic Violence Victim 5,722 68,664 6,216 74,592 6,907 82,884 7,594 91,128 7,996 95,952 3 3 pn58 Evidence Technician 5,770 69,240 6,228 74,736 6,854 82,248 7,539 90,468 7,928 95,136 1 1 pn57 Police Services Specialist Lead 7,998 95,976 (7.5% above Specialist, Step E) 2 2 pn56 Animal Control Officer 5,441 65,292 5,883 70,596 6,469 77,628 7,114 85,368 7,471 89,652 16 16 pn54 Police Services Specialist 5,419 65,028 5,854 70,248 6,444 77,328 7,088 85,056 7,440 89,280 3 3 pn53 Police Administrative Specialist 4,851 58,212 5,245 62,940 5,766 69,192 6,343 76,116 6,655 79,860 2 2 pn52 Parking Enforcement Officer 4,700 56,400 5,072 60,864 5,587 67,044 6,146 73,752 6,449 77,388 36 0 36 Interpreter Premium…………...……………………..…………….................….....…3% of base pay (Article 6.5.2) 4% of base pay (Article 6.5.3) 4% of base pay (Article 6.5.1) Double time with 3 hrs min (Article 6.4) 2025 CITY OF RENTON SALARY TABLE POLICE DEPARTMENT - Non-Commissioned Employees Curren t FTE Addition /Remov Revised FTE Effective January 1, 2025 STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E Wage Adjustment Authorized NON-COMMISSIONED PREMIUM PAY (Articles 6.4 and 6.5) Public Records Act Premium……..…………………………………...............……… Field Training Officer, FTO (Police Service Specialist)…...............………… Crisis Communication Unit………..........…………………………..............……… AGENDA ITEM #2. a) 4.0% 2025 CITY OF RENTON SALARY TABLE POLICE DEPARTMENT - Non-Commissioned Employees Effective January 1, 2025 Wage Adjustment Completion of 5 Yrs 2% POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED - MONTHLY LONGEVITY INCENTIVE PAY SCHEDULE (Article 12, Appendix B.1) Years of Service ercentage (of base wage 4% Completion of 15 Yrs 6% Completion of 20 Yrs 10% Completion of 10 Yrs Completion of 25 Yrs 12% Completion of 30 Yrs 14% MONTHLY EDUCATIONAL INCENTIVE PAY SCHEDULE (Appendix B.2) Percentage (of base wage) AA Degree (90 credits) 4% BA/BS Degree or Masters Degree 6% - The city contributes 3.5% of the employee's base wage to a deferred comp account. (Appendix A.3 of Non- Commissioned Guild CBA) - The city contributes an additional 3% of employee's wage base toward deferred comp for passing physical fitness. - The city contributes 2% of the employee's base wage to a VEBA plan. (Article 14.10 of Agreement By and Between City of Renton and Non-Commissioned Employees of the Renton Police Guild (2024- 2026) (Non-Commissioned Guild CBA)) AGENDA ITEM #2. a) Grade h50 20.90 h51 21.00 h52 22.00 h53 23.00 h54 24.00 h55 25.00 h56 26.00 h57 27.00 h58 28.00 h59 29.00 h60 30.00 h61 31.00 h62 32.00 h63 33.00 h64 34.00 h65 35.00 h66 40.00 h67 45.00 h68 50.00 h69 55.00 h70 60.00 h71 65.00 h72 70.00 h73 75.00 h74 80.00 h75 85.00 h76 90.00 h77 95.00 h78 100.00 2025 CITY OF SUPPLEMENTAL WAGE TABLE AGENDA ITEM #2. a) $0 $0 2.7% Grade Position Title Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual 2025 FTE Addition/ Removal 2026 FTE 1 1 E10 Mayor (1) 20,968 251,615 1 1 E09 City Council President (2)(7) 6 6 E09 City Council Members (2) 2 2 E11 Municipal Court Judge (6) to RMC 3-10-2.E E2 17,364 208,369 18,088 217,051 18,841 226,095 19,626 235,515 20,444 245,328 21,296 255,550 22,183 266,198 23,108 277,290 1 1 Chief Administrative Officer E1 15,756 189,075 16,413 196,954 17,097 205,160 17,809 213,708 18,551 222,613 19,324 231,888 20,129 241,550 20,968 251,615 1 1 City Attorney 1 1 Parks & Recreation Administrator 1 1 Community & Economic Development Administrator 1 1 Deputy Chief Administrative Officer 1 1 Finance Administrator 1 1 Human Resources & Risk Mgmt Administrator 1 1 Public Works Administrator P3 16,399 196,793 17,083 204,993 17,795 213,534 18,536 222,431 19,308 231,699 20,113 241,353 20,951 251,410 21,824 261,885 1 1 Police Chief (3) P2 14,792 177,499 15,408 184,895 16,050 192,599 16,719 200,624 17,415 208,983 18,141 217,691 18,897 226,762 19,684 236,210 2 2 Police Deputy Chief (4) P1 11,898 142,771 12,393 148,720 12,910 154,917 13,448 161,372 14,008 168,095 14,592 175,099 15,200 182,395 15,833 189,995 6 6 Police Commander (5) MG24 14,470 173,641 15,073 180,876 15,701 188,412 16,355 196,263 17,037 204,440 17,747 212,959 18,486 221,832 19,256 231,075 MG23 14,149 169,782 14,738 176,856 15,352 184,225 15,992 191,901 16,658 199,897 17,352 208,226 18,075 216,902 18,828 225,940 1 1 Finance Director 1 1 Information Technology Director 1 1 Judicial Administrative Officer MG22 13,827 165,923 14,403 172,837 15,003 180,038 15,628 187,540 16,280 195,354 16,958 203,494 17,664 211,973 18,400 220,805 1 1 Development Engineering Director 1 1 Planning Director 1 1 Transportation Systems Director 1 1 Utility Systems Director MG21 13,505 162,065 14,068 168,817 14,654 175,851 15,265 183,179 15,901 190,811 16,563 198,761 17,254 207,043 17,973 215,670 3 3 Sr Assistant City Attorney MG20 13,184 158,206 13,733 164,798 14,305 171,664 14,901 178,817 15,522 186,268 16,169 194,029 16,843 202,114 17,545 210,535 1 1 Parks and Trails Director 1 1 Prosecution Director MG19 12,862 154,347 13,398 160,778 13,957 167,478 14,538 174,456 15,144 181,725 15,775 189,297 16,432 197,184 17,117 205,400 1 1 Economic Development Director MG18 12,541 150,489 13,063 156,759 13,608 163,291 14,175 170,094 14,765 177,182 15,380 184,564 16,021 192,254 16,689 200,265 1 1 Maintenance Services Director MG17 12,219 146,630 12,728 152,740 13,259 159,104 13,811 165,733 14,387 172,639 14,986 179,832 15,610 187,325 16,261 195,130 1 1 Communications and Engagement Director 1 1 Development Services Director 1 1 Government Affairs Manager 1 1 Infrastructure & Security Manager MG16 11,898 142,771 12,393 148,720 12,910 154,917 13,448 161,372 14,008 168,095 14,592 175,099 15,200 182,395 15,833 189,995 1 1 Airport Director 1 1 Development Engineering Manager 1 1 Enterprise Applications Manager 1 1 Facilities Director 1 1 HR Labor Relations & Compensation Manager 1 1 Recreation Director MG15 11,576 138,913 12,058 144,701 12,561 150,730 13,084 157,010 13,629 163,552 14,197 170,367 14,789 177,466 15,405 184,860 1 1 Construction Engineering Manager 1 1 Human Services Director 1 1 ITS and Maintenance Manager 3 3 Utility Engineering Manager MG14 11,255 135,054 11,723 140,681 12,212 146,543 12,721 152,649 13,251 159,009 13,803 165,635 14,378 172,536 14,977 179,725 1 1 Assistant City Attorney 1 1 Budget & Accounting Manager 1 1 Business Recruitment and Retention Manager 1 1 Human Resources Benefits Manager 1 1 Lead Prosecutor 1 1 Redevelopment Manager 1 1 Risk Manager 1 1 Transportation Design Manager 1 1 Transportation Planning Manager 1 1 Transportation Operations Manager MG13 10,933 131,195 11,389 136,662 11,863 142,356 12,357 148,287 12,872 154,466 13,409 160,902 13,967 167,606 14,549 174,590 1 1 City Clerk/Public Records Officer 1 1 Current Planning Manager Authorized 2026 CITY OF RENTON SALARY TABLE NON-REPRESENTED (NON-UNION) Wage Adjustment STEP 1 STEP 2 STEP 3 STEP 4 STEP 5 STEP 6 Effective January 2026STEP 7 STEP 8 ELECTED OFFICIALS As established by the Independent As established by the Independent AGENDA ITEM #2. a) $0 $0 2.7% 2026 CITY OF RENTON SALARY TABLE NON-REPRESENTED Wage Adjustment STEP 1 STEP 2 STEP 3 STEP 4 STEP 5 STEP 6 Effective January 2026STEP 7 STEP 8 1 1 Economic Development Manager 1 1 Emergency Management Director 1 1 Long Range Planning Manager 1 1 Water Maintenance Manager AGENDA ITEM #2. a) $0 $0 2.7% 2026 CITY OF RENTON SALARY TABLE NON-REPRESENTED Wage Adjustment STEP 1 STEP 2 STEP 3 STEP 4 STEP 5 STEP 6 Effective January 2026STEP 7 STEP 8 MG12 10,611 127,337 11,054 132,642 11,514 138,169 11,994 143,926 12,494 149,923 13,014 156,170 13,556 162,677 14,121 169,455 1 1 Asset Manager 1 1 Capital Projects Manager 1 1 Financial Operations Manager 1 1 Organizational Development Manager 1 1 Street Maintenance Manager 1 1 Waste Water/Special Operations Manager MG11 10,290 123,478 10,719 128,623 11,165 133,982 11,630 139,565 12,115 145,380 12,620 151,437 13,146 157,747 13,693 164,320 1 1 Enterprise Content Manager 1 1 Facilities Manager 1 1 Fleet Manager 1 1 Parks Planning & Trails Manager 1 1 Sustainability & Solid Waste Manager MG10 9,968 119,619 10,384 124,603 10,816 129,795 11,267 135,203 11,736 140,837 12,225 146,705 12,735 152,818 13,265 159,185 1 1 Communications Manager 1 1 Parks Maintenance Manager 1 1 Permit Services Manager 1 1 Tax & Licensing Manager NR22 9,647 115,760 10,049 120,584 10,467 125,608 10,904 130,842 11,358 136,294 11,831 141,972 12,324 147,888 12,838 154,050 1 1 Assistant Building Official 1 1 GIS & Data Manager 3 1 4 Prosecuting Attorney 1 1 Recreation Manager 1 -1 0 Human Services Manager NR21 9,325 111,902 9,714 116,564 10,118 121,421 10,540 126,480 10,979 131,750 11,437 137,240 11,913 142,958 12,410 148,915 1 1 Code Compliance Manager 1 1 Financial Operations Supervisor NR20 9,004 108,043 9,379 112,545 9,770 117,234 10,177 122,119 10,601 127,207 11,042 132,508 11,502 138,029 11,982 143,780 1 1 Comms & Community Engagement Manager (PD) 1 1 Golf Course Manager 1 1 Police Manager 1 1 Senior Human Resources Analyst - Workforce & Equity NR19 8,682 104,184 9,044 108,525 9,421 113,047 9,813 117,758 10,222 122,664 10,648 127,775 11,092 133,099 11,554 138,645 2 2 Senior Benefits Analyst 2 2 Senior Employee Relations Analyst 7 7 Senior Finance Analyst 1 1 Urban Forestry and Natural Resources Manager 1 -1 0 Museum Manager NR18 8,361 100,326 8,709 104,506 9,072 108,860 9,450 113,396 9,843 118,121 10,254 123,043 10,681 128,170 11,126 133,510 1 1 Senior Grants Analyst 1 1 Senior Risk Management Analyst NR17 8,039 96,467 8,374 100,487 8,723 104,673 9,086 109,035 9,465 113,578 9,859 118,310 10,270 123,240 10,698 128,375 1 1 Chief of Staff 2 2 Court Services Manager 1 1 Deputy City Clerk/Public Disclosure Manager 1 1 Employee Relations Analyst 1 1 Senior Tax & Licensing Auditor 1 1 Solid Waste Program Manager NR16 7,717 92,608 8,039 96,467 8,374 100,487 8,723 104,673 9,086 109,035 9,465 113,578 9,859 118,310 10,270 123,240 0 0 Benefits Analyst 1 1 Executive Assistant 1 1 Golf Course Supervisor 1 1 Head Golf Professional 1 1 Legal Analyst 2 2 Payroll Technician 3 4 1 5 Recreation Supervisor 0 0 Risk Management Analyst NR15 7,396 88,750 7,704 92,448 8,025 96,300 8,359 100,312 8,708 104,492 9,071 108,846 9,448 113,381 9,842 118,105 1 1 Community Events Coordinator 1 1 Community Outreach Coordinator 0 1 1 Finance Analyst 3 1 1 Parks & Recreation Program Coordinator NR14 7,074 84,891 7,369 88,428 7,676 92,113 7,996 95,951 8,329 99,949 8,676 104,113 9,038 108,451 9,414 112,970 1 1 Tax & Licensing Auditor 2 NR13 6,753 81,032 7,034 84,409 7,327 87,926 7,632 91,589 7,951 95,406 8,282 99,381 8,627 103,522 8,986 107,835 0 0 Finance Analyst 2 NR12 6,431 77,174 6,699 80,389 6,978 83,739 7,269 87,228 7,572 90,862 7,887 94,648 8,216 98,592 8,558 102,700 7 7 Administrative Assistants (All Depts) 0 0 Payroll Technician 2 0 0 Tax & Licensing Auditor 1 NR11 6,110 73,315 6,364 76,370 6,629 79,552 6,906 82,866 7,193 86,319 7,493 89,916 7,805 93,662 8,130 97,565 1 1 Assistant Golf Professional 2 2 Human Resources Specialist NR10 5,788 69,456 6,029 72,350 6,280 75,365 6,542 78,505 6,815 81,776 7,099 85,183 7,394 88,733 7,703 92,430 0 0 Finance Analyst 1 0 0 Payroll Technician 1 NR01 4,654 55,852 4,883 58,601 5,124 61,484 5,384 64,602 5,660 67,918 5,895 70,743 6,140 73,686 6,396 76,751 1 1 Office Specialist AGENDA ITEM #2. a) $0 $0 2.7% 2026 CITY OF RENTON SALARY TABLE NON-REPRESENTED Wage Adjustment STEP 1 STEP 2 STEP 3 STEP 4 STEP 5 STEP 6 Effective January 2026STEP 7 STEP 8 148 1 149 $7,727 Completion of 5 Yrs Completion of 10 Yrs Completion of 15 Yrs Completion of 20 Yrs Completion of 25 Yrs Completion of 30 Yrs (1) In addition to salary receives annual car allowance of $4800 or use of a city vehicle. Not eligible for longevity. (2) (3) Eligible for Longevity at the Non-Represented Longevity pay scale. Not eligible for Education or Uniform Allowance. (4)Eligible for Longevity at the Non-Represented Longevity pay scale and Education Premium. Not eligible for Uniform Allowance. Eligible for 3% cash premium or 3% into deferred compensation per employee's discretion for passing physical fitness. (5)Receive Education/Longevity & Uniform Allowance based on Union Contract. Eligible for 3% deferred compensation for passing physical fitness. Eligible for P2 paid job injury leave based on Union Contract. (6) 4 year term. Not eligible for longevity. (7) Council president to be paid $300/month above council members salary. 7% Step a14E $541 per month Council members salary set per Independent Salary Commission pursuant to Chapter 2-20 RMC. Council receives 2% of salary for deferred comp. If members are prohibited from participating in PERS, they receive an extra 1.4 % of salary for deferred compensation. Not eligible for longevity. The city contributes 4% of employee's base wage per year to a deferred compensation account for Management and Non-Represented employees; except for CAO receives 11% per year. 5% Step a14E $386 per month 6% Step a14E $464 per month 3% Step a14E $232 per month 4% Step a14E $309 per month NON-REPRESENTED LONGEVITY PAY Step a14, E = 2% Step a14E $155 per month AGENDA ITEM #2. a) COLA 2.7% Authorized Grade Position Title Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual a40 12,027 144,324 12,627 151,524 13,268 159,216 13,942 167,304 14,645 175,740 a39 11,754 141,048 12,337 148,044 12,942 155,304 13,601 163,212 14,289 171,468 a38 11,454 137,448 12,027 144,324 12,627 151,524 13,268 159,216 13,942 167,304 5 5 a37 Principal Civil Engineer 11,191 134,292 11,754 141,048 12,337 148,044 12,942 155,304 13,601 163,212 a36 10,908 130,896 11,454 137,448 12,027 144,324 12,627 151,524 13,268 159,216 a35 10,647 127,764 11,191 134,292 11,754 141,048 12,337 148,044 12,942 155,304 1 1 a34 Structural Plans Examiner 10,386 124,632 10,908 130,896 11,454 137,448 12,027 144,324 12,627 151,524 19 1 20 a33 Civil Engineer 3 10,135 121,620 10,647 127,764 11,191 134,292 11,754 141,048 12,337 148,044 1 1 a32 Airport Operations Manager 9,891 118,692 10,386 124,632 10,908 130,896 11,454 137,448 12,027 144,324 2 2 a32 Principal Planner 9,891 118,692 10,386 124,632 10,908 130,896 11,454 137,448 12,027 144,324 1 1 a31 Client Technology Sys & Support Super 9,641 115,692 10,135 121,620 10,647 127,764 11,191 134,292 11,754 141,048 5 5 a30 Civil Engineer 2 9,410 112,920 9,891 118,692 10,386 124,632 10,908 130,896 11,454 137,448 2 2 a30 Senior Systems Analyst 9,410 112,920 9,891 118,692 10,386 124,632 10,908 130,896 11,454 137,448 4 4 a29 Capital Projects Coordinator 9,181 110,172 9,641 115,692 10,135 121,620 10,647 127,764 11,191 134,292 1 1 a29 ITS & Signal Maintenance Supervisor 9,181 110,172 9,641 115,692 10,135 121,620 10,647 127,764 11,191 134,292 1 1 a29 Network & Security Engineer 2 9,181 110,172 9,641 115,692 10,135 121,620 10,647 127,764 11,191 134,292 1 1 a29 Program Development Coordinator 2 9,181 110,172 9,641 115,692 10,135 121,620 10,647 127,764 11,191 134,292 2 2 a29 Senior Network Systems Specialist 9,181 110,172 9,641 115,692 10,135 121,620 10,647 127,764 11,191 134,292 2 2 a29 Senior Planner 9,181 110,172 9,641 115,692 10,135 121,620 10,647 127,764 11,191 134,292 4 4 a28 Senior Business Systems Analyst 8,954 107,448 9,410 112,920 9,891 118,692 10,386 124,632 10,908 130,896 1 1 a28 Transportation Planner 8,954 107,448 9,410 112,920 9,891 118,692 10,386 124,632 10,908 130,896 1 1 a28 Water Treatment Operations Supervisor 8,954 107,448 9,410 112,920 9,891 118,692 10,386 124,632 10,908 130,896 6 6 a27 GIS Analyst 3 8,738 104,856 9,181 110,172 9,641 115,692 10,135 121,620 10,647 127,764 0 0 a27 Systems Analyst 8,738 104,856 9,181 110,172 9,641 115,692 10,135 121,620 10,647 127,764 0 0 a26 Civil Engineer 1 8,522 102,264 8,954 107,448 9,410 112,920 9,891 118,692 10,386 124,632 1 1 a26 Facilities Coordinator 8,522 102,264 8,954 107,448 9,410 112,920 9,891 118,692 10,386 124,632 1 1 a26 Lead Building Inspector 8,522 102,264 8,954 107,448 9,410 112,920 9,891 118,692 10,386 124,632 1 1 a26 Lead Code Compliance Inspector 8,522 102,264 8,954 107,448 9,410 112,920 9,891 118,692 10,386 124,632 1 1 a26 Lead Construction Engineering Inspector 8,522 102,264 8,954 107,448 9,410 112,920 9,891 118,692 10,386 124,632 1 1 a26 Lead Electrical/Ctrl Systems Technician 8,522 102,264 8,954 107,448 9,410 112,920 9,891 118,692 10,386 124,632 1 1 a26 Neighborhood Program Coordinator 8,522 102,264 8,954 107,448 9,410 112,920 9,891 118,692 10,386 124,632 0 0 a26 Program Development Coordinator 1 8,522 102,264 8,954 107,448 9,410 112,920 9,891 118,692 10,386 124,632 0 0 a25 Network & Security Engineer 1 8,315 99,780 8,738 104,856 9,181 110,172 9,641 115,692 10,135 121,620 1 1 a25 Network Systems Specialist 8,315 99,780 8,738 104,856 9,181 110,172 9,641 115,692 10,135 121,620 1 1 a25 Senior Economic Development Specialist 8,315 99,780 8,738 104,856 9,181 110,172 9,641 115,692 10,135 121,620 1 1 a24 Airport Ops & Maintenance Supervisor 8,114 97,368 8,522 102,264 8,954 107,448 9,410 112,920 9,891 118,692 2 2 a24 Building Plan Reviewer 8,114 97,368 8,522 102,264 8,954 107,448 9,410 112,920 9,891 118,692 0 0 a24 Business Systems Analyst 8,114 97,368 8,522 102,264 8,954 107,448 9,410 112,920 9,891 118,692 6 6 a24 Engineering Specialist 3 8,114 97,368 8,522 102,264 8,954 107,448 9,410 112,920 9,891 118,692 1 1 a24 GIS Analyst 2 8,114 97,368 8,522 102,264 8,954 107,448 9,410 112,920 9,891 118,692 1 1 a24 Property Services Specialist 8,114 97,368 8,522 102,264 8,954 107,448 9,410 112,920 9,891 118,692 1 1 a24 Street Maintenance Services Supervisor 8,114 97,368 8,522 102,264 8,954 107,448 9,410 112,920 9,891 118,692 2 2 a24 Waste Water Maint. Services Supervisor 8,114 97,368 8,522 102,264 8,954 107,448 9,410 112,920 9,891 118,692 1 1 a24 Water Maintenance Services Supervisor 8,114 97,368 8,522 102,264 8,954 107,448 9,410 112,920 9,891 118,692 1 1 a23 Client Technology Services Specialist 3 7,918 95,016 8,315 99,780 8,738 104,856 9,181 110,172 9,641 115,692 2 2 a23 Custodial Maintenance Supervisor 7,918 95,016 8,315 99,780 8,738 104,856 9,181 110,172 9,641 115,692 1 1 a23 Data Analyst 7,918 95,016 8,315 99,780 8,738 104,856 9,181 110,172 9,641 115,692 2 2 a23 Emergency Management Coordinator 7,918 95,016 8,315 99,780 8,738 104,856 9,181 110,172 9,641 115,692 1 1 a23 Facilities Supervisor 7,918 95,016 8,315 99,780 8,738 104,856 9,181 110,172 9,641 115,692 1 1 a23 Housing Repair Coordinator 7,918 95,016 8,315 99,780 8,738 104,856 9,181 110,172 9,641 115,692 Effective January 1, 2026 STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E 2026 CITY OF RENTON SALARY TABLE AFSCME, Local 2170 2025 FTE Addition/ Removal 2026 FTE AGENDA ITEM #2. a) COLA 2.7% Authorized Grade Position Title Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Effective January 1, 2026 STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E 2026 CITY OF RENTON SALARY TABLE AFSCME, Local 2170 2025 FTE Addition/ Removal 2026 FTE 1 1 a23 Pavement Management Technician 7,918 95,016 8,315 99,780 8,738 104,856 9,181 110,172 9,641 115,692 0 0 a23 Plan Reviewer 7,918 95,016 8,315 99,780 8,738 104,856 9,181 110,172 9,641 115,692 0 0 a23 Senior Paralegal 7,918 95,016 8,315 99,780 8,738 104,856 9,181 110,172 9,641 115,692 4 4 a23 Signal & ITS Technician 3 7,918 95,016 8,315 99,780 8,738 104,856 9,181 110,172 9,641 115,692 1 1 a23 Utility Accounts Supervisor 7,918 95,016 8,315 99,780 8,738 104,856 9,181 110,172 9,641 115,692 6 6 a22 Associate Planner 7,727 92,724 8,114 97,368 8,522 102,264 8,954 107,448 9,410 112,920 2 2 a22 Building Inspector/Combination 7,727 92,724 8,114 97,368 8,522 102,264 8,954 107,448 9,410 112,920 3 3 a22 Building Inspector/Electrical 7,727 92,724 8,114 97,368 8,522 102,264 8,954 107,448 9,410 112,920 2 2 a22 Case Manager 7,727 92,724 8,114 97,368 8,522 102,264 8,954 107,448 9,410 112,920 4 4 a22 Code Compliance Inspector 7,727 92,724 8,114 97,368 8,522 102,264 8,954 107,448 9,410 112,920 1 1 a22 Communications Specialist 2 7,727 92,724 8,114 97,368 8,522 102,264 8,954 107,448 9,410 112,920 7 7 a22 Construction Engineering Inspector 7,727 92,724 8,114 97,368 8,522 102,264 8,954 107,448 9,410 112,920 0 0 a22 GIS Analyst 1 7,727 92,724 8,114 97,368 8,522 102,264 8,954 107,448 9,410 112,920 2 2 a22 Parks Maintenance Supervisor 7,727 92,724 8,114 97,368 8,522 102,264 8,954 107,448 9,410 112,920 1 1 a22 Water Meter Tech. Services Supervisor 7,727 92,724 8,114 97,368 8,522 102,264 8,954 107,448 9,410 112,920 1 1 a21 Business Coordinator - Airport 7,533 90,396 7,918 95,016 8,315 99,780 8,738 104,856 9,181 110,172 1 1 a21 Human Services Coordinator 7,533 90,396 7,918 95,016 8,315 99,780 8,738 104,856 9,181 110,172 1 1 a21 Lead Vehicle & Equipment Mechanic 7,533 90,396 7,918 95,016 8,315 99,780 8,738 104,856 9,181 110,172 1 1 a21 Public Records Analyst 7,533 90,396 7,918 95,016 8,315 99,780 8,738 104,856 9,181 110,172 1 1 a21 Traffic Signage & Marking Supervisor 7,533 90,396 7,918 95,016 8,315 99,780 8,738 104,856 9,181 110,172 1 1 a21 SCADA/Telemetry Technician 7,533 90,396 7,918 95,016 8,315 99,780 8,738 104,856 9,181 110,172 1 1 a20 Client Technology Services Specialist 2 7,349 88,188 7,727 92,724 8,114 97,368 8,522 102,264 8,954 107,448 1 1 a20 Economic Development Specialist 7,349 88,188 7,727 92,724 8,114 97,368 8,522 102,264 8,954 107,448 1 1 a20 Engineering Specialist 2 7,349 88,188 7,727 92,724 8,114 97,368 8,522 102,264 8,954 107,448 1 1 a20 Enterprise Content Specialist 2 7,349 88,188 7,727 92,724 8,114 97,368 8,522 102,264 8,954 107,448 1 1 a20 Inspecting Arborist 7,349 88,188 7,727 92,724 8,114 97,368 8,522 102,264 8,954 107,448 1 1 a20 Senior Program Specialist 7,349 88,188 7,727 92,724 8,114 97,368 8,522 102,264 8,954 107,448 1 1 a19 Electrical Technician 7,169 86,028 7,533 90,396 7,918 95,016 8,315 99,780 8,738 104,856 1 1 a19 Encampment Clean-Up Lead 7,169 86,028 7,533 90,396 7,918 95,016 8,315 99,780 8,738 104,856 1 1 a19 Farmers Market Coordinator 7,169 86,028 7,533 90,396 7,918 95,016 8,315 99,780 8,738 104,856 1 1 a19 HVAC Systems Technician 7,169 86,028 7,533 90,396 7,918 95,016 8,315 99,780 8,738 104,856 7 7 a19 Recreation Program Coordinator 7,169 86,028 7,533 90,396 7,918 95,016 8,315 99,780 8,738 104,856 3 3 a19 Senior Sustainability Specialist 7,169 86,028 7,533 90,396 7,918 95,016 8,315 99,780 8,738 104,856 0 0 a19 Signal & ITS Technician 2 7,169 86,028 7,533 90,396 7,918 95,016 8,315 99,780 8,738 104,856 4 4 a19 Water Treatment Plant Operator 7,169 86,028 7,533 90,396 7,918 95,016 8,315 99,780 8,738 104,856 1 1 a18 Assistant Planner 7,001 84,012 7,349 88,188 7,727 92,724 8,114 97,368 8,522 102,264 0 0 a18 Development Services Representative 7,001 84,012 7,349 88,188 7,727 92,724 8,114 97,368 8,522 102,264 1 1 a18 Lead Golf Course Maintenance Worker 7,001 84,012 7,349 88,188 7,727 92,724 8,114 97,368 8,522 102,264 7 7 a18 Lead Maintenance Services Worker 7,001 84,012 7,349 88,188 7,727 92,724 8,114 97,368 8,522 102,264 2 2 a18 Lead Parks Maintenance Worker 7,001 84,012 7,349 88,188 7,727 92,724 8,114 97,368 8,522 102,264 1 1 a18 Maintenance Buyer 7,001 84,012 7,349 88,188 7,727 92,724 8,114 97,368 8,522 102,264 4 1 5 a18 Paralegal 7,001 84,012 7,349 88,188 7,727 92,724 8,114 97,368 8,522 102,264 1 1 a18 Water Utility Maintenance Technician 7,001 84,012 7,349 88,188 7,727 92,724 8,114 97,368 8,522 102,264 1 1 a17 Digital Communications Specialist 6,825 81,900 7,169 86,028 7,533 90,396 7,918 95,016 8,315 99,780 2 2 a17 Lift Station Technician 6,825 81,900 7,169 86,028 7,533 90,396 7,918 95,016 8,315 99,780 0.75 0.75 a17 Program Assistant 6,825 81,900 7,169 86,028 7,533 90,396 7,918 95,016 8,315 99,780 1 1 a17 Public Records Specialist 6,825 81,900 7,169 86,028 7,533 90,396 7,918 95,016 8,315 99,780 1 1 a17 Senior Traffic Maintenance Worker 6,825 81,900 7,169 86,028 7,533 90,396 7,918 95,016 8,315 99,780 0.5 0.5 a17 Sustainability Specialist 6,825 81,900 7,169 86,028 7,533 90,396 7,918 95,016 8,315 99,780 0 0 a17 Water Treatment Plant Operator Trainee 6,825 81,900 7,169 86,028 7,533 90,396 7,918 95,016 8,315 99,780 2 2 a16 City Clerk Specialist 2 6,666 79,992 7,001 84,012 7,349 88,188 7,727 92,724 8,114 97,368 2 2 a16 Client Technology Services Specialist 1 6,666 79,992 7,001 84,012 7,349 88,188 7,727 92,724 8,114 97,368 1 1 a16 Court Operations Specialist 6,666 79,992 7,001 84,012 7,349 88,188 7,727 92,724 8,114 97,368 0 0 a16 Enterprise Content Specialist 1 6,666 79,992 7,001 84,012 7,349 88,188 7,727 92,724 8,114 97,368 2 1 3 a16 Facilities Technician 2 6,666 79,992 7,001 84,012 7,349 88,188 7,727 92,724 8,114 97,368 0.75 0.75 a16 Recreation Specialist 6,666 79,992 7,001 84,012 7,349 88,188 7,727 92,724 8,114 97,368 5 5 a16 Vehicle & Equipment Mechanic 2 6,666 79,992 7,001 84,012 7,349 88,188 7,727 92,724 8,114 97,368 1 1 a15 Airport Operations Specialist 6,494 77,928 6,825 81,900 7,169 86,028 7,533 90,396 7,918 95,016 1 1 a15 Asset Management Systems Technician 6,494 77,928 6,825 81,900 7,169 86,028 7,533 90,396 7,918 95,016 1 1 a15 Communications Specialist 1 6,494 77,928 6,825 81,900 7,169 86,028 7,533 90,396 7,918 95,016 AGENDA ITEM #2. a) COLA 2.7% Authorized Grade Position Title Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Effective January 1, 2026 STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E 2026 CITY OF RENTON SALARY TABLE AFSCME, Local 2170 2025 FTE Addition/ Removal 2026 FTE 1 1 a15 Grounds Equipment Mechanic 6,494 77,928 6,825 81,900 7,169 86,028 7,533 90,396 7,918 95,016 1 1 a15 Housing Maintenance Technician 6,494 77,928 6,825 81,900 7,169 86,028 7,533 90,396 7,918 95,016 4 4 a15 Planning Technician 6,494 77,928 6,825 81,900 7,169 86,028 7,533 90,396 7,918 95,016 1 1 a15 Signal & ITS Technician 1 6,494 77,928 6,825 81,900 7,169 86,028 7,533 90,396 7,918 95,016 1 1 a14 Engineering Specialist 1 6,341 76,092 6,666 79,992 7,001 84,012 7,349 88,188 7,727 92,724 4 4 a14 Facilities Technician 1 6,341 76,092 6,666 79,992 7,001 84,012 7,349 88,188 7,727 92,724 1 1 a14 Golf Course Maintenance Worker 3 6,341 76,092 6,666 79,992 7,001 84,012 7,349 88,188 7,727 92,724 26 26 a14 Maintenance Services Worker 3 6,341 76,092 6,666 79,992 7,001 84,012 7,349 88,188 7,727 92,724 12 12 a14 Parks Maintenance Worker 3 6,341 76,092 6,666 79,992 7,001 84,012 7,349 88,188 7,727 92,724 3 3 a14 Permit Services Specialist 6,341 76,092 6,666 79,992 7,001 84,012 7,349 88,188 7,727 92,724 1 1 a14 Print & Mail Supervisor 6,341 76,092 6,666 79,992 7,001 84,012 7,349 88,188 7,727 92,724 0 0 a14 Program Specialist 6,341 76,092 6,666 79,992 7,001 84,012 7,349 88,188 7,727 92,724 1 1 a14 Recreation Systems Technician 6,341 76,092 6,666 79,992 7,001 84,012 7,349 88,188 7,727 92,724 3 3 a14 Traffic Maintenance Worker 2 6,341 76,092 6,666 79,992 7,001 84,012 7,349 88,188 7,727 92,724 3 3 a13 Judicial Specialist 2 6,184 74,208 6,494 77,928 6,825 81,900 7,169 86,028 7,533 90,396 3 3 a12 Airport Maintenance Worker 6,037 72,444 6,341 76,092 6,666 79,992 7,001 84,012 7,349 88,188 0 0 a12 City Clerk Specialist 1 6,037 72,444 6,341 76,092 6,666 79,992 7,001 84,012 7,349 88,188 0 0 a12 Vehicle & Equipment Mechanic 1 6,037 72,444 6,341 76,092 6,666 79,992 7,001 84,012 7,349 88,188 1 1 a12 Water Meter System Specialist 6,037 72,444 6,341 76,092 6,666 79,992 7,001 84,012 7,349 88,188 2 2 a11 Encampment Clean-Up Worker 5,888 70,656 6,184 74,208 6,494 77,928 6,825 81,900 7,169 86,028 1 1 a11 Fleet Management Technician 5,888 70,656 6,184 74,208 6,494 77,928 6,825 81,900 7,169 86,028 1 1 a11 IT Procurement & Contract Coordinator 5,888 70,656 6,184 74,208 6,494 77,928 6,825 81,900 7,169 86,028 2 2 a11 Lead Maintenance Custodian 5,888 70,656 6,184 74,208 6,494 77,928 6,825 81,900 7,169 86,028 2 2 a11 Legal Assistant 5,888 70,656 6,184 74,208 6,494 77,928 6,825 81,900 7,169 86,028 AGENDA ITEM #2. a) COLA 2.7% Authorized Grade Position Title Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Effective January 1, 2026 STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E 2026 CITY OF RENTON SALARY TABLE AFSCME, Local 2170 2025 FTE Addition/ Removal 2026 FTE 7 7 a10 Accounting Assistant 4 5,744 68,928 6,037 72,444 6,341 76,092 6,666 79,992 7,001 84,012 14 14 a10 Administrative Secretary 1 5,744 68,928 6,037 72,444 6,341 76,092 6,666 79,992 7,001 84,012 1 1 a10 Golf Course Maintenance Worker 2 5,744 68,928 6,037 72,444 6,341 76,092 6,666 79,992 7,001 84,012 1 1 a10 Golf Course Operations Assistant 5,744 68,928 6,037 72,444 6,341 76,092 6,666 79,992 7,001 84,012 23 23 a10 Maintenance Services Worker 2 5,744 68,928 6,037 72,444 6,341 76,092 6,666 79,992 7,001 84,012 6 6 a10 Parks Maintenance Worker 2 5,744 68,928 6,037 72,444 6,341 76,092 6,666 79,992 7,001 84,012 3 3 a10 Recreation Assistant 5,744 68,928 6,037 72,444 6,341 76,092 6,666 79,992 7,001 84,012 0 0 a10 Traffic Maintenance Worker 1 5,744 68,928 6,037 72,444 6,341 76,092 6,666 79,992 7,001 84,012 5 5 a09 Judicial Specialist 1 5,603 67,236 5,888 70,656 6,184 74,208 6,494 77,928 6,825 81,900 1 1 a09 Purchasing Assistant 5,603 67,236 5,888 70,656 6,184 74,208 6,494 77,928 6,825 81,900 1 1 a08 Accounting Assistant 3 5,468 65,616 5,744 68,928 6,037 72,444 6,341 76,092 6,666 79,992 1 1 a08 Court Security Officer 5,468 65,616 5,744 68,928 6,037 72,444 6,341 76,092 6,666 79,992 3 3 a08 Maintenance Custodian 5,468 65,616 5,744 68,928 6,037 72,444 6,341 76,092 6,666 79,992 2 2 a08 Secretary 2 5,468 65,616 5,744 68,928 6,037 72,444 6,341 76,092 6,666 79,992 2 2 a08 Water Meter Technician 5,468 65,616 5,744 68,928 6,037 72,444 6,341 76,092 6,666 79,992 4 4 a07 Maintenance Services Worker 1 5,335 64,020 5,603 67,236 5,888 70,656 6,184 74,208 6,494 77,928 0 0 a06 Accounting Assistant 2 5,210 62,520 5,468 65,616 5,744 68,928 6,037 72,444 6,341 76,092 0 0 a06 Golf Course Maintenance Worker 1 5,210 62,520 5,468 65,616 5,744 68,928 6,037 72,444 6,341 76,092 2 2 a06 Parks Maintenance Worker 1 5,210 62,520 5,468 65,616 5,744 68,928 6,037 72,444 6,341 76,092 a05 5,080 60,960 5,335 64,020 5,603 67,236 5,888 70,656 6,184 74,208 0 0 a04 Accounting Assistant 1 4,958 59,496 5,210 62,520 5,468 65,616 5,744 68,928 6,037 72,444 6 6 a04 Parks Maintenance Assistant 4,958 59,496 5,210 62,520 5,468 65,616 5,744 68,928 6,037 72,444 1 1 a04 Print & Mail Assistant 4,958 59,496 5,210 62,520 5,468 65,616 5,744 68,928 6,037 72,444 2 2 a04 Pro Shop Assistant 4,958 59,496 5,210 62,520 5,468 65,616 5,744 68,928 6,037 72,444 1 1 a03 Golf Course Associate 4,836 58,032 5,080 60,960 5,335 64,020 5,603 67,236 5,888 70,656 13 13 a02 Custodian 4,728 56,736 4,958 59,496 5,210 62,520 5,468 65,616 5,744 68,928 a01 4,604 55,248 4,836 58,032 5,080 60,960 5,335 64,020 5,603 67,236 366 3 369 $7,727 Completion of 5 Yrs Completion of 10 Yrs Completion of 15 Yrs Completion of 20 Yrs Completion of 25 Yrs Completion of 30 Yrs 4% Step a14E $309 per month 5% Step a14E $386 per month - The city contributes 3% of employee's base wage per year to a deferred compensation account. (Article 14 of Agreement By and Between City of Renton and Local 2170, Washington State Council of County and City Employees, American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees) - The city contributes 1% of employee's base wage per year to a VEBA account. (Article 12.3 of AFSCME CBA) 6% Step a14E $464 per month 7% Step a14E $541 per month 3% Step a14E $232 per month LONGEVITY PAY Step a14, E = 2% Step a14E $155 per month AGENDA ITEM #2. a) 3.5% Grade Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Police Chief See Non-Represented Salary Table, Grade P3 Police Deputy Chief See Non-Represented Salary Table, Grade P2 Police Commander See Non-Represented Salary Table, Grade P1 17 17 pc61 Sergeant* 12,275 147,300 13,257 159,084 111 4 115 pc60 8,649 103,788 9,332 111,984 9,999 119,988 10,674 128,088 pc59 8,141 97,692 8,782 105,384 9,411 112,932 10,045 120,540 128 4 132 Percent Interpreters -----------------------3% Detectives ------------------------3% Traffic Assignment---------------3% Motorcycle Assignment------------- 2% Background Investigator------------ 3% Canine Officer -------------------4% Corporal Assignment -----------7.5% Field Training Officer ------------3% 8% when assigned student(s) Training Officer-------------------3% SWAT Assignment ---------------4% SRO Assignment-----------------3% Civil Disturbance Paid at rate of double time with 3 hrs Unit --------------------------------minimum when called to an emergency. Special Weapons and Tactics------------------------ Negotiator-------------------------4% SET/DET---------------------------- VIIT----------------------------------2%* VIIT Lead------------------------------- 4%* Percentage (of base wage) Wage Adjustment 2026 CITY OF RENTON SALARY TABLE POLICE DEPARTMENT - Commissioned Officers Position Title HAZARD DUTY AND PREMIUM PAY (Article 6.7 and 6.8) Frozen Frozen Budgeted Police Officer 2 (2189 Schedule) (6.25% over Police Police Officer 1 (Newly Hired 2080 2025 FTE Addition /Remov 2026 FTE (15% over Police Officer 2) *Step increase at 12 months Effective January 1 2026 STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E Paid at rate of time and one half with a MONTHLY LONGEVITY PAY (Appendix B) Years of Service Completion of 5 Yrs 2% 3% minimum when called to an *In addition to a paid rate of time and one half with 3 hr minimum when called out. Completion of 10 Yrs 4% Completion of 15 Yrs 6% Completion of 20 Yrs 10% Completion of 25 Yrs 12% Completion of 30 Yrs 14% AGENDA ITEM #2. a) 3.5% Grade Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Wage Adjustment 2026 CITY OF RENTON SALARY TABLE POLICE DEPARTMENT - Commissioned Officers Position Title Budgeted 2025 FTE Addition /Remov 2026 FTE Effective January 1 2026 STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E Percentage (of base wage) - - - 6% The city contributes 1% of employee's wage base toward deferred compensation. (Appendix A.2.2 of Agreement By and Between City of Renton and Renton Police Guild Representing Commissioned Employees (January 1, 2024-December 31, 2026) (Commissioned Guild CBA)) BA Degree/Masters Degree AA Degree (90 credits) NOTE: Please refer to the current labor agreement for specific information. MONTHLY EDUCATIONAL INCENTIVE PAY (Appendix B) 4% The city contributes 3% of employee's wage base toward deferred compensation for passing physical fitness. (Article 6.8.4, and Appendix A.2.3 of Commissioned Guild CBA) Effective January 1, 2025, the city contributes 3% of employee's wage base to a VEBA plan. (Article 14.10 of Commissioned Guild CBA) AGENDA ITEM #2. a) 3.0% Grade Position Title Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual pn70 7,597 91,164 8,213 98,556 9,025 108,300 9,917 119,004 10,439 125,268 pn69 7,411 88,932 8,011 96,132 8,804 105,648 9,676 116,112 10,184 122,208 pn68 7,231 86,772 7,818 93,816 8,590 103,080 9,439 113,268 9,936 119,232 33pn67Community Engagement Coord.7,054 84,648 7,627 91,524 8,381 100,572 9,208 110,496 9,693 116,316 pn66 6,881 82,572 7,441 89,292 8,175 98,100 8,984 107,808 9,455 113,460 pn65 6,714 80,568 7,258 87,096 7,977 95,724 8,765 105,180 9,227 110,724 11pn64 Crime Analyst 6,693 80,316 7,232 86,784 7,944 95,328 8,564 102,768 8,993 107,916 pn63 6,391 76,692 6,909 82,908 7,590 91,080 8,343 100,116 8,782 105,384 2 2 pn62 Police Services Specialist Supervisor 8,813 105,756 (15% above Specialist, Step E) 2(2)0 Electronic Home Detention Coord 6,229 74,748 6,722 80,664 7,402 88,824 8,138 97,656 8,543 102,516 pn60 6,314 75,768 6,823 81,876 7,494 89,928 8,079 96,948 8,484 101,808 1 1 pn59 Domestic Violence Victim Advocate 5,894 70,728 6,402 76,824 7,114 85,368 7,822 93,864 8,236 98,832 3 3 pn58 Evidence Technician 5,943 71,316 6,415 76,980 7,060 84,720 7,765 93,180 8,166 97,992 1 1 pn57 Police Services Specialist Lead 8,238 98,856 (7.5% above Specialist, Step E) 2 2 pn56 Animal Control Officer 5,604 67,248 6,059 72,708 6,663 79,956 7,327 87,924 7,695 92,340 16 16 pn54 Police Services Specialist 5,582 66,984 6,030 72,360 6,637 79,644 7,301 87,612 7,663 91,956 3 3 pn53 Police Administrative Specialist 4,997 59,964 5,402 64,824 5,939 71,268 6,533 78,396 6,855 82,260 2 2 pn52 Parking Enforcement Officer 4,841 58,092 5,224 62,688 5,755 69,060 6,330 75,960 6,642 79,704 36 (2)34 2026 CITY OF RENTON SALARY TABLE POLICE DEPARTMENT - Non-Commissioned Employees STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E Budgeted 2025 FTE Addition /Remova 2026 FTE pn61 AGENDA ITEM #2. a) 3.0% 2026 CITY OF RENTON SALARY TABLE POLICE DEPARTMENT - Non-Commissioned Employees Interpreter Premium…………...……………………..…………….................…3% of base pay (Article 6.5.2) 4% of base pay (Article 6.5.3) 4% of base pay (Article 6.5.1) Double time with 3 hrs min (Article 6.4) AA Degree (90 credits) POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED - MONTHLY LONGEVITY INCENTIVE PAY SCHEDULE (Article 12, Appendix B.1) Years of Service Percentage (of base wage) NON-COMMISSIONED PREMIUM PAY (Articles 6.4 and 6.5) Public Records Act Premium……..…………………………………...............… Field Training Officer, FTO (Police Service Specialist)…...............……… Crisis Communication Unit………..........…………………………..............… Completion of 15 Yrs 6% Completion of 20 Yrs 10% Completion of 5 Yrs 2% Completion of 10 Yrs 4% Completion of 25 Yrs 12% Completion of 30 Yrs 14% MONTHLY EDUCATIONAL INCENTIVE PAY SCHEDULE (Appendix B.2) Percentage (of base wage) BA/BS Degree or Masters Degree 6% - The city contributes 3.5% of the employee's base wage to a deferred comp account. (Appendix A.3 of Non- Commissioned Guild CBA) - The city contributes an additional 3% of employee's wage base toward deferred comp for passing physical fitness. (Article 6.8 of Non-Commissioned Guild CBA) - The city contributes 2% of the employee's base wage to a VEBA plan. (Article 14.10 of Agreement By and Between City of Renton and Non-Commissioned Employees of the Renton Police Guild (2024-2026) (Non- Commissioned Guild CBA)) 4% AGENDA ITEM #2. a) Grade h51 21.57 h52 22.00 h53 23.00 h54 24.00 h55 25.00 h56 26.00 h57 27.00 h58 28.00 h59 29.00 h60 30.00 h61 31.00 h62 32.00 h63 33.00 h64 34.00 h65 35.00 h66 40.00 h67 45.00 h68 50.00 h69 55.00 h70 60.00 h71 65.00 h72 70.00 h73 75.00 h74 80.00 h75 85.00 h76 90.00 h77 95.00 h78 100.00 2026 CITY OF RENTON SUPPLEMENTAL EMPLOYEE WAGE TABLE AGENDA ITEM #2. a) 1 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. ________ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, ESTABLISHING THE PROPERTY TAX LEVY FOR THE YEAR 2026 FOR GENERAL CITY OPERATIONAL PURPOSES IN THE AMOUNT OF $26,621,838, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Council has met and considered its budget for the fiscal year 2026; and WHEREAS, the Council, after hearing and considering all relevant evidence and testimony presented, determined that, in order to discharge the expected expenses and obligations of the city and in its best interest, the City of Renton requires a regular levy in the amount of $26,621,838 for 2026; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The regular property tax levy is hereby authorized for 2026 in the amount of $26,621,838. This amount includes new construction and improvements to property in the amount of $65,037; re-levy of prior year refunds in the amount of $0; adjustments as a result of annexations that have occurred in the amount of $0; and any increase in the value of state- assessed property. SECTION II. The regular levy includes levy for the Firemen’s Pension at the rate of $0.225 per $1,000 assessed valuation. SECTION III. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality thereof shall not affect the constitutionality of any other section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this ordinance. AGENDA ITEM #2. b) ORDINANCE NO. ________ 2 SECTION IV. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect five (5) days after publication of a summary of this ordinance in the City's official newspaper. The summary shall consist of this ordinance's title. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2025. __________________________ Jason A. Seth, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2025. __________________________ Armondo Pavone, Mayor Approved as to form: Shane Moloney, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD-FIN: 25ORD022:10/06/2025 AGENDA ITEM #2. b) 1 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. ________ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING A ONE PERCENT (1%) INCREASE IN THE PROPERTY TAX TO BE LEVIED FOR THE YEAR 2026, PLUS INCREASES ATTRIBUTABLE TO NEW CONSTRUCTION, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council has properly given notice of the public hearing to consider the city’s 2025-2026 proposed budget pursuant to RCW 84.55.120; and WHEREAS, the City Council, after hearing and after duly considering all relevant evidence and testimony presented, has determined that there is a need to increase the property tax revenues from the prior year, in addition to the increase resulting from annexations, the addition of new construction, and improvements to property, and any increases in the value of state- assessed property, in order to discharge the expected expenses and obligation of the city; and WHEREAS, RCW 84.55.120 requires the adoption of a separate ordinance specifically authorizing the property tax increase; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The 2026 regular property tax levy in the amount of $26,621,838 requires an increase of 1.00% or $262,939 above the 2025 levy without consideration for increases attributable to annexation, new construction, improvements to property, and re-levy of prior year refund and correction amounts. Such increase as shown below is hereby authorized. AGENDA ITEM #2. c) ORDINANCE NO. ________ 2 SECTION II. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality thereof shall not affect the constitutionality of any other section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this ordinance. SECTION III. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect five (5) days after publication of a summary of this ordinance in the City's official newspaper. The summary shall consist of this ordinance's title. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2025. __________________________ Jason A. Seth, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2025. __________________________ Armondo Pavone, Mayor AGENDA ITEM #2. c) ORDINANCE NO. ________ 3 Approved as to form: Shane Moloney, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD-FIN:25ORD021:10/06/2025 AGENDA ITEM #2. c) 1 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. _______ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THE CURRENT CAPITAL FACILITIES PLANS FOR KENT, ISSAQUAH, AND RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICTS, AND CURRENT CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN FOR RENTON REGIONAL FIRE AUTHORITY; AND AMENDING THE 2025-2026 CITY OF RENTON FEE SCHEDULE. WHEREAS, on November 23, 2009, the Council adopted Ordinance No. 5509, which removed many fees from the Renton Municipal Code (“RMC”) and consolidated them into the 2010 City of Renton Fee Schedule brochure, which has been subsequently amended; and WHEREAS, on November 18, 2024, the City Council passed Resolution No. 6147, adopting an amended fee schedule for 2025 and 2026; and WHEREAS, on May 5, 2025 the fee schedule for 2025 and 2026 was subsequently amended by Resolution No. 6158; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to approve an amended fee schedule to make periodic updates as part of the City’s Mid-Biennial Budget amendment; and WHEREAS, under RMC Section 4-1-190, the City of Renton has heretofore collected school impact fees on behalf of the Kent, Issaquah, and Renton School Districts, and collected fire impact impacts on behalf of the Renton Regional Fire Authority (“RRFA”); and WHEREAS, the Kent, Issaquah, and Renton School Districts, and RRFA each have requested that the City of Renton adopt the District’s and RRFA’s current Capital Facilities Plans, remove the school impact fees as established in the District’s Capital Facilities Plans, and adjust the fire impact fees as established in the RRFA’s Capital Facilities Plan; and AGENDA ITEM #2. d) RESOLUTION NO. _______ 2 WHEREAS, it is further necessary to approve an amended fee schedule to amend the impact fees for Kent, Issaquah, and Renton School Districts, and to extend the existing applicable Fire Impact Fees and Fire Marshal Plan Review and Inspection Fees, pursuant to City Council’s approval on November 18, 2024, under Impact Fees in Section XII Development Fees and Fire Marshal Fees under Section XIII Fire Department Fire Marshal Fees of the fee schedule; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The fee schedule is amended and replaced with the 2025-2026 City of Renton Fee Schedule brochure, which is attached hereto and adopted by this reference (“Fee Schedule”). An updated copy of the Fee Schedule shall at all times be filed with the City Clerk as required by Ordinance No. 5509. SECTION II. The City Council hereby adopts by reference as if fully set forth herein the following Capital Facilities Plans: A. The Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan 2024-2025 through 2030-2031, dated June 2025, attached as Exhibit B; and B. The 2025 Capital Facilities Plan of Issaquah School District No. 411, dated June 2025, attached as Exhibit C; and C. The 2025 Capital Facilities Plan of Renton School District No. 403, dated June 2025, attached as Exhibit D; and D. The Renton Regional Fire Authority 2026 Rate Schedule, Capital Facilities Plan, and Rate Study for Fire Impact Fees, dated August 2025, dated August 2025, attached as Exhibit E. AGENDA ITEM #2. d) RESOLUTION NO. _______ 3 SECTION III. The amended Fee Schedule adopted by Section I of this resolution shall be effective upon passage and approval of this resolution, and thereafter act as the City of Renton’s Fee Schedule for all fees or changes referenced therein. The Fee Schedule shall remain in effect until amended or otherwise replaced by the City Council. In the event the Fee Schedule is not amended prior to the year 2027, the fees specified for the year 2026 shall continue to apply into and beyond 2027 until amended by the City Council. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this ______ day of _____________________, 2025. ______________________________ Jason A. Seth, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this ______ day of _____________________, 2025. ______________________________ Armondo Pavone, Mayor Approved as to form: ______________________________ Shane Moloney, City Attorney RES-FIN:25RES024:10/07/2025 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) City of Renton Fee Schedule 2025-2026 Rev. September 2025 2025-2026 City of Renton Fee Schedule Exhibit A AGENDA ITEM #2. d) City of Renton Fee Schedule 2025-2026 Table of Contents Page SECTION I. MISCELLANEOUS FEES 1 SECTION II. MAPLEWOOD GOLF COURSE 2 SECTION III. CITY CENTER PARKING FEES 2 SECTION IV. AQUATIC FEES 3 SECTION V. CARCO THEATER (REPEALED) 3 SECTION VI. PARKS AND FACILITIES USE AND RENTAL 3 SECTION VII. COMMUNITY CENTER PASS CARD & FEES 4 SECTION VIII. AIRPORT CHARGES 4 SECTION IX. ANIMAL LICENSES FEES - RMC 5-4-2 4 SECTION X. BUSINESS LICENSES 5 SECTION XI. ADULT ENTERTAINMENT LICENSES 5 SECTION XII. DEVELOPMENT FEES 6 Building Fees:6 Land Use Review Fees:8 Site Work, Utilities, and Right of Way Fees: 10 Technology Surcharge Fee 14 Impact Fees: 14 Miscellaneous Fees: 15 SECTION XIII. FIRE DEPARMENT FIRE MARSHAL FEES (RFA) 15 17SECTION XIV. MONETARY PENALTY SCHEDULE FOR INFRACTIONS ISSUED UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF CHAPTER 7.80 RCW AGENDA ITEM #2. d) City of Renton Fee Schedule 2025-2026 SECTION I. MISCELLANEOUS FEES*2025 2026 1. Maps: a.$4 $4 b. $12 $12 c. $4 $4 d. $12 $12 e. $5 $5 2. Plat: a. $2 $2 b. $1 $1 3. Photocopies: a. $0.15 $0.15 b. $0.20 $0.20 c. $0.25 $0.25 4. Budget: a. $10 $10 b. N/C N/C 5. Audio or Video Recording Copies: a.$2 $2 b.$2 $2 6. Regulations and Plans: a.Comprehensive Plan and Map $30 $30 b.Title IV, Development Regulations: (i) Text and Zoning Map $110 $110 (ii) Text only $100 $100 c.Individual Chapters of Development Regulations $10 $10 d. Renton Municipal Code (two volumes)$400 $400 e.Code Supplements, per year: (i) Titles I - III and VI - X $70 $70 (ii) Title IV $70 $70 7. Miscellaneous Services: a.Certification and Notary Fees - Clerk's Certification $10 $10 b.Notary Public Attestation or Acknowledgement or as $10 $10 otherwise provided for in RCW 42.28.090, per signature c.Hold Harmless Agreements and other similar documents $20 $20 not otherwise provided for d.Lamination of licenses, pictures $6 $6 e.Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) Loan Program: (i) Application Fee $200 $200 (ii) Loan Origination Fee $150 or 0.25% of loan amount, whichever is greater $150 or 0.25% of loan amount, whichever is greater (iii) Closing Costs (including any legal fees)50% of total actual costs 50% of total actual costs 8. Miscellaneous Charges for Police Services: a.Police Reports per page $0.15 $0.15 b.Record Checks (Written Response) $5 $5 c.Photographs - Digital on CD $2 $2 d.Photographs - black & white or color - Cost of developing film Cost Cost e.Fingerprint Cards $5 $5 (i) Each additional card $1 $1 9. Charges for Fire Documents: a.Fire reports per page $0.15 $0.15 b.Fire investigative report on CD $2 $2 c.First copy - black & white or color - Cost of developing film Cost Cost d.Additional copy - black & white or color - Cost of developing film Cost Cost 10. Computer Listings: a.City of Renton new business list $10 $10 b.List of all business licenses $20 $20 c.Copies requested to be faxed, local number $3 $3 d.Copies requested to be faxed, long distance number (i) Multi-family: 2 units, Duplexes, & Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) 1 $10 $10 (ii) Six (6) or more pages (ten (10) page limit)$20 $20 11. Utility Fee: a.Special Request Water Meter Reading $30 $30 b.Utility New Account Setup $25 $25 c.Utility Billing Account Transfer (tenant billing form)$5 $5 d.Water utility outstanding balance search requested by $25 $25 fax, messenger, or letter e Water turn off and turn on fee $60 $60 f Water utility shutoff list processing fee $60 $60 g Water delinquent late fee of 10% of past due charges but not less than fifty cents 10% 10% h Water after hours service charge to turn on water after 3 p.m. (additional fee)$90 $90 i Tenant notification fee for impending shutoff of water per tenant $5 $5 j Petition filing fee for stormwater appeal from category determination and assessment $75 $75 k Meter Accuracy Reading - For testing 3/4" through 2" meter $40 $40 l Meter Accuracy Reading - For testing meters larger than 2"Time & Materials, requires Time & Materials, requires a $60 refundable deposit a $60 refundable deposit prior to test prior to test 12. Schedule of Fines for False Alarms - Security/Burglar: (effective February 1, 2019) a.$25 $25 b.N/C N/C c.N/C N/C d.$100 $100 e.$250 $250 f.$25 $25 g.$50 $50 1 A registration year shall mean January 1 thru December 31 each year. 13. NSF Check Fees $25 $25 14. Veteran Park Tile: Three lines $75 $75 Late Payment Fee Unregistered Alarm System Fee First False Alarm in a registration year1 One-time Registration Fee Annual Registration Renewal Second False Alarm in a registration year1 Third or more False Alarm in a registration year1 Audio recording, each copy Video recording, each copy City's Budget to other municipality or quasi-municipal corporation or other nonprofit charitable or education organization City's Budget Zoning maps - standard 11 x 17 Zoning maps - large 24 x 36 Comprehensive Plan map - standard 11 x 17 Comprehensive Plan map - large 24 x 36 Precinct maps First page Each additional page Each 8.5" x 11" or 8.5" x 14" Each 11" x 17" Each 8.5" x 11" or 8.5" x 14" color 1 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) City of Renton Fee Schedule 2025-2026 SECTION I. MISCELLANEOUS FEES* (CONTINUED)2025 2026 15. Electronic Records 1,2,3: a.Photocopies or printed copies of electronic records, per page $0.15 $0.15 b.Scanning paper records, per page $0.10 $0.10 c.$0.05 $0.05 d.$0.10 $0.10 e.Body worn camera footage redaction, per minute of documented staff time, plus other documented costs of redaction $0.64 $0.64 16. Document Recording Fees: a.Actual Costs Actual Costs b.Actual Costs Actual Costs 17. Publication Fees: Actual Costs Actual Costs SECTION II. MAPLEWOOD GOLF COURSE 2025 2026 1. a.Weekday: (i) 18 Hole $48 $50 $52 (ii) 9 Hole $35 $37 $40 (iii) 18 Hole, Senior $40 $42 $45 (iv) 9 Hole, Senior $30 $32 $35 (v) 18 Hole, Junior $26 $28 (vi) 9 Hole, Junior $20 $22 b.Weekend: (i) 18 Hole $55 $60 $62 (ii) 9 Hole $40 $42 $45 2. Club Rental: a.Regular $35 $35 b.Premium $65 $65 3. Golf Cart Fees: a.18 Hole $38 $40 b.18 Hole Single Rider $28 $30 c.9 Hole $26 $28 d.9 Hole Single Rider $18 $20 e.Trail Fee $20 $20 f.Half Cart, 18 Hole $19 $20 g.Half Cart, 9 Hole $13 $14 4. Driving Range Fees: a.Large Bucket $14 $15 b.Small Bucket $11 $12 c.Warm-up Bucket $7 $7 5. Lesson Fees: a.1/2 Hour Private $60 $65 b.1 Hour Private $90 $95 c.1/2 Hour Series Private $220 $230 d.1 Hour Series Private $330 $340 e.Group Series $160 $180 f.1/2 Hour Private, Junior $40 $45 g.Playing Lesson(3-hole minimum/9-hole maximum) per hole $30 $35 SECTION III. CITY CENTER PARKING FEES 2025 2026 1. City Center Parking Garage Fees 1: Parking rates for retail parking will be as follows: a.Zero (0) - two (2) hours N/C N/C b.Two (2) - four (4) hours $2 $2 c.Four (4) - six (6) hours $4 $4 d.Six (6) - (10) hours $6 $6 e. 10 hours or more $10 $10 f.Monthly pass-holders, tax included $35 $35 1 1 The charges identified in RCW 42.56.120(3)(b) (and referenced above) may be combined to the extent that more than one type of charge applies to copies produced in response to a particular request. The actual cost of any digital storage media or device provided by the agency. Alternatively, the City may charge a flat fee of up to $2 for the entire request as long as the cost of uploading and transmitting the electronic records is reasonably estimated to equal or exceed that amount. Only one $2 flat fee per request is authorized for electronic records produced in installments. When records are provided electronically on a CD, DVD, thumb drive, flash drive, or other electronic device, the requestor will be charged for the cost of the electronic storage device. The City may charge an actual-cost service charge for requests that require use of IT expertise to prepare data compilations or provide customized electronic access services when not used by the City for other purposes. A cost estimate and explanation will be provided to the requestor before incurring the costs. 2 Option to waive charges. The City may waive charges associated with fulfilling a request. The decision will be based on various factors, including the volume and format of the responsive documents. The decision to assess fees for fulfilling a public records request shall be made on a consistent and equitable basis, dependent primarily upon the amount of staff time required for copying, scanning, shipping, uploading, and/or transmitting the records associated with fulfilling a request. 3 Certified copies. If the requestor is seeking a certified copy of a City record, an additional charge of $1.00 per each complete document may be applied to cover the additional expense and time required for certification. *Should Section I fees due total less than $4.00 and no other fee is due to the City at the same time, the department administrator may authorize to waive the entire amount due at their discretion. For purposes of this section, "weekend" shall mean Friday, Saturday, and Sunday. "Weekday" shall mean the remaining four days of the week. "Junior" shall mean ages 17 and under, "Senior" shall mean ages 62 and over. Green Fees: Parking garage fees for periods of up to 10 hours are waived by Ord 6139 until 12/31/2025. Transmission of records in an electronic format or for the use of agency equipment to send the records electronically, per gigabyte (GB) Electronic files or attachments uploaded for electronic delivery (email, cloud-based data storage service, or other means of electronic delivery), for each four (4) files The applicant shall pay all document recording fees charged by King county and all administrative fees charged by the title company for processing. Payment in full shall by submitted to the City before documents are sent for recording. Off-season and promotional rates determined by management; posted on website. The applicant shall pay all Publication fees charged by publication outlet used by the City (The Seattle Times or equivalent). Payment in full shall be made to the City prior to public hearing, permit approval or issuance, whichever comes first. Miscellaneous charges associated with document recording, such as courier fees 2 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) City of Renton Fee Schedule 2025-2026 SECTION IV. AQUATIC FEES 2025 2026 1. Admission for the Aquatic Center shall be as follows: a.Regular Session: (i) Infants - under 1 year N/C N/C (ii) Youth - 1 to 4 years $8 $8 (iii) Ages 5 and up $16 $16 (iv) Lap swim - water walking only $7 $7 (v) Locker Rental $0.25 $0.25 b.Canopy Rental Fees1: (includes canopy and admission for one leisure swim session): (i) Henry Moses Party Tent #1 (10' x 20' for up to twenty-five (25) guests on wave pool): (1) Resident Rate, per session $600 $600 (2) Non-resident Rate, per session $700 $700 (ii) Henry Moses Party Tent #2 (10' x 20' for up to twenty-five (25) guests): (1) Resident Rate $500 $500 (2) Non-Resident Rate $600 $600 (iii) Henry Moses Party Tent #3 (10' x 10' for up to ten (10) guests): (1) Resident Rate, per session $250 $250 (2) Non-resident Rate, per session $300 $300 c.Resident Rate all inclusive1 $3,800 $3,800 d.Non-resident Rate all inclusive1 $4,800 $4,800 e.Swim Lesson Program: Fees and associated descriptions are published in the "Let's Go Renton " Renton Activities Guide f.End-of-year School Party Rentals: (i) Renton School District (1) 001 - 299 students $1,900 $1,900 (2) 300 - 399 students $2,250 $2,250 (3) 400 - 499 students $2,400 $2,400 (4) 500 - 599 students $2,550 $2,550 (ii) Other Schools and Districts (1) 001 - 299 students $2,450 $2,450 (2) 300 - 399 students $2,850 $2,850 (3) 400 - 499 students $3,150 $3,150 (4) 500 - 599 students $3,360 $3,360 1 Sales tax not included in the rental fee 2. Boat Launch Rates: a.Daily resident - 7 days a week $20 $20 b.Daily Non-resident - 7 days a week $25 $25 c.Overnight resident - 7 days a week $25 $25 d.Overnight Non-resident - 7 days a week $45 $45 e.Annual parking boat launch permit - resident $70 $70 f.Annual parking boat launch permit - non-resident $130 $130 g. (i) $110 $110 (ii) $115 $115 SECTION V. CARCO THEATER (REPEALED)2025 2026 SECTION VI. PARKS AND FACILITIES USE AND RENTAL 2025 2026 1. Outlying Picnic Shelters (Cedar River Trail, Liberty Park, Philip Arnold Park, Teasdale Park and Heritage Park) Maximum of 50 people: a.Resident 10am-7pm $150 $150 b.Non-resident 10am-7pm $290 $290 c.Refundable Security and Damage deposit $100 $100 2. Gene Coulon Beach Park Shelters (South #1, South #2 and Creekside) Maximum of 75 people: a.Resident 10am-7pm $150 $150 b.Non-resident 10am-7pm $290 $290 e.South Shelters 1 & 2 Resident rate $310 $310 f.South Shelters 1 & 2 Non-resident rate $610 $610 g.Refundable Security and Damage deposit $100 $100 3. Gene Coulon Beach Park Shelters (North Shelter): a.Resident 10am-7pm $200 $200 b.Non-resident 10am-7pm $360 $360 c.Refundable Security and Damage deposit $100 $100 4. Basketball court rate per hour (Tournament Play Only): a.Resident rate $25 $25 b.Non-resident rate $30 $30 c $750 $750 5. a.Resident rate per hour $25 $25 b.Non-resident rate per hour $30 $30 c.Temporary Event Permit Fee $85 $85 d.Refundable Security and Damage deposit $750 $750 6. Piazza Park Open Space Event Rental a.Full day rental 10am - 7pm $500 $500 b.Refundable Security and Damage deposit $750 $750 7. Photo Shoots per hour: a.Commercial Film and Photo Shoots per hour $300 $300 8. Electrical Spider Box rental: a. Electrical spider box rental per box, per event, with special event approval $200 $200 Open Space Area in the Parks (Cascade, Teasdale, Philip Arnold, Cedar River, Earlington, Gene Coulon, Glencoe, Kennydale Lions, Sunset, and Riverview Parks): Fishing Tournaments at Coulon Beach (additional rental fee if using the Pavilion area for weigh in and or electricity at the current rental rate) per event Resident rate Non-resident rate Refundable Security and Damage deposit 3 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) City of Renton Fee Schedule 2025-2026 SECTION VI. PARKS AND FACILITIES USE AND RENTAL (CONTINUED)2025 2026 9. Athletic Field Rental, Lights and Prep Fees: a.Sports field rental per hour - resident $30 $30 b.Sports field rental per hour - non-resident $36 $36 c.Renton Area Youth Sports Agencies, per hour $8 $8 d.Field prep for softball/baseball - resident per occurrence $35 $35 e.Field prep for soccer - resident per occurrence $50 $50 f.Custom Field prep - resident per occurrence $100 $100 g.Field prep for softball/baseball - non-resident per occurrence $40 $40 h.Field prep for soccer - non-resident per occurrence $55 $55 i.Custom Field prep - non-resident per occurrence $100 $100 j.Field lights all sports - resident per hour $30 $30 k.Field lights all sports - non-resident per hour $36 $36 l.Refundable Security and Damage deposit $750 $750 10. Banquet & Classroom Rental - Community Center & Senior Activity Center: a.Friday evening 5 hour minimum - resident $750 $750 b.Weekend Rates 10 hour minimum - resident $1,500 $1,500 c.Extra hours - per hour - resident $150 $150 d.Friday 5 hour minimum - non-resident $900 $900 e.Weekend Rates 10 hour minimum - non-resident $1,800 $1,800 f.Extra hours - per hour - non-resident $180 $180 g Banquet Room - Mon - Fri - daytime - resident/hr 3 hour min $100 $100 h Banquet Room - Mon - Fri - daytime - non-resident/hr 3 hour min $120 $120 i.Refundable Security and Damage deposit $750 $750 j.Cancellation Fee - Less than 90 days $550 $550 11. Classroom and Gymnasium Rental - Renton Community Center: a.Resident single gym athletic - per hour $50 $50 b.Non-resident single gym athletic - per hour $60 $60 c.Resident double gym athletic - per hour $100 $100 d.Non-resident double gym athletic - per hour $120 $120 e.Resident single gym non-athletic $1,000 $1,000 f.Non-resident single gym non-athletic $1,200 $1,200 g.Resident double gym non-athletic $2,000 $2,000 h.Non-resident double gym non-athletic $2,400 $2,400 i.Carpet fee single gym - resident & non-resident $325 $325 j.Carpet fee double gym - resident & non-resident $650 $650 k.Classroom resident $40 $40 l.Classroom Non-resident $48 $48 12. Facility Rental - Neighborhood Center: a.Meeting room - resident $40 $40 b.Gymnasium - resident $40 $40 c.Meeting room - non-resident $48 $48 d.Gymnasium - non-resident $48 $48 e.Refundable Security and Damage deposit $750 $750 13. Farmer's Market a.10x10 Lot $40 $40 b.Half Lot $20 $20 c.Application fee $30 $30 d.Electrical fee $10 $10 14. Parklet Rentals a. Parklet Rental including Installation per Occurrence1,2 $500 $73/month, $876/year 15. Outlying Park Buildings (Tiffany Park Building, Kennydale Park Building, Teasdale Park Building) a.6-hour block - resident $200 $200 b.6-hour block - non-resident $240 $240 c.Deposit resident & non-resident $250 $250 d.Non-profit fee - per hour (no deposit required)$40 $40 e.Refundable Security and Damage deposit $750 $750 16. Renton History Museum a.Adult (18 yrs + up)$5 $5 b.Child ( 9 yrs - 17 yrs)$2 $2 SECTION VII. COMMUNITY CENTER PASS CARD & FEES 2025 2026 Fees and associated descriptions are published and available in the "Let's Go Renton" Recreation Guide. SECTION VIII. AIRPORT CHARGES 2025 2026 1.Airport Fuel Flow Charge: per gallon $0.08 $0.08 2.JetA Fuel Flow Charge: per gallon $0.10 $0.10 3.T-Hangar Waitlist, one time fee $100 $100 4 T-Hangar, Move-in Fee (non-refundable)$250 $250 5 T-Hangar Rental Space (monthly) (plus leasehold excise tax)$580 $580 6 Tie-down Waitlist, one time fee $25 $25 7 Tie-down Rental Space (monthly) (plus leasehold excise tax)$185.60 $185.60 8.Penalty for violation of Minimum Standards/Airport Rules & Regulations (each occurrence)$500 $500 9.Penalty for Movement Area Incursions (each occurrence), assessed to sponsor/tenant $500 $500 10 Lost gate card fee per occurrence $50 $50 11 Transient airplane parking (daily)$8 $8 SECTION IX. ANIMAL LICENSES FEES1 - RMC 5-4-2 2025 2026 1.Altered Animal Annual License $30 $30 2.Unaltered Animal Annual License $50 $50 3.Economically Qualified Resident Special Lifetime License $0 $0 4.Duplicate Tag $10 $10 2 Parklet rental is subject to sales tax 1 Long-Term Right of Way Permit will be required if located within the City Right of Way. See Section XII, Development Fees, of the City of Renton Fee Schedule Brochure: Subsection e of subsection 3, Site Work, Utilities, and Right of Way Fees 1 Please note, impounded animals are subject to license fees, microchipping costs, and other out-of-pocket costs as specified in RMC 6-6-2. 4 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) City of Renton Fee Schedule 2025-2026 SECTION X. BUSINESS LICENSES 2025 2026 1. General Business License: a.Registration Fee $150 $150 b.Per hour fee, for each worker hour *$0.0352 $0.0352 b.Appeal of Business License Decision $250 $250 2. Short Term Employment within the City: a.A temporary ninety (90) day license maybe purchased for each FTE on a temporary job*$50 $50 *Not to exceed 270 consecutive days 2. Penalties: a.The penalty to reinstate an expired business license $50 $50 b.The penalty for failure to obtain a business license $250 $250 c. SECTION XI. ADULT ENTERTAINMENT LICENSES 2025 2026 1. Every person applying for a adult entertainment license shall pay the applicable nonrefundable application fee: a.Adult Entertainment Business License $750 $750 b.Entertainer $75 $75 c.Manager $75 $75 d.License Replacement $10 $10 2. Penalties: a.Civil Penalty, per violation $1,000 $1,000 5%-15% 5%-15% * Payment of all license fee amounts still owing for the last three (3) years, plus a penalty of (20%) per annum for all amounts owing, plus any accounting, legal or administrative expenses incurred by the City in determining the nonreporting, or the unpaid portion over the last (3) years or in collecting the tax and/or penalty. Failure to pay the license fee within one day after the day on which it is due and payable pursuant to subsection C7 of Chapter 5 of the RMC shall render the business enterprise subject to a penalty of (5%) of the amount of the license fee for the first month of the delinquency and an additional penalty of (5%) for each succeeding month of delinquency, but not exceeding a total penalty of (15%) of the amount of such license fee. * Per hour rate shall be adjusted every other year by Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, All Items, Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (also known as CPI-W) ending August 31, for the same two year period. 5 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) City of Renton Fee Schedule 2025-2026 SECTION XII. DEVELOPMENT FEES 2025 2026 1. a. (i)$43 $44 b. (i)$327 $337 (ii)$359 $370 (iii)$262 $270 (iv)$294 $303 (v)$294 $303 (vi)$359 $370 c. (i)65% of permit fee 65% of permit fee (ii)50% of initial plan Check Fee 50% of initial plan Check Fee d. (i)$25 $25 (ii) (1)$6.50 $6.50 (2)$2 $2 e. (i) (1) (a)$277 $286 (b)$294 $303 (2) (a)$215 $222 (b)$228 $235 (c)$27 $28 (d)$215 $222 (e)$96 $99 (ii) (1)$85 $88 (2)$85 + 4.95% of value $88 + 5.03% of value (3)$109.75+ 4.95% of value $113.15 + 5.24% of value (4)$313.20 + 2.66% of value $322.91 + 2.74% of value (5)$1,508.46 + 1.76% of value $1,555.22 + 1.81% of value (6)$5,021.92 + 1.50% of value $5,177.60 + 1.55% of value (7)$16,265.03 + 0.55% of value $16,769.25 + 0.56% of value (iii)$215 $222 (iv) (1)$215 $222 (2)$215 $222 (3)$215 $222 (5) (a)$139 $143 (b)$215 $222 f.$196 $202 $5,149.40 + $7.56 x each $1,000 value $5,308.23 + $7.79 x each $1,000 value $8,928.40 + $5.83 x each $1,000 value $9,205.04 + $6.02 x each $1,000 value 50% of commercial fees Minimum $209 50% of commercial fees Minimum $209 $196 on 1st unit / $25 each add'l unit $202 on 1st unit / $26 each add'l unit 1 This covers only the Building Section inspection of the structure prior to move. There is a separate additional fee charged by the Public Works Department to cover the actual house move permit. A building permit is also required in order to site the structure on the new site. 1 This fee shall be $0 for City of Renton Capital Improvement Projects or city funded projects. 2 Building Plan Check Fee is in addition to the building permit fees, demolition permit fees, and combination building permit fees. The plan check fee is equal to 65% of the building permit fee, or the demolition permit fee, or the combination building permit fee. Includes three (3) review cycles. Building Plan Check Fee1,3 Combination Building Permit Fees1,2 $500.01 to $1,000.00 $1,000.01 to 5,000.00 $5,000.01 to $50,000.00 $50,000.01 to $250,000.00 $250,000.01 to $1,000,000.00 Cooling system circuit for new or replaced appliance Up to 200 AMP Over 200 AMP Base Residential Fee Each additional unit after first unit $43 + $4.87 x each $100 value $44 + $7.98 x each $100 value $116.06 + $22.30 x each $1,000 value $119.66 x $22.99 each $1,000 value $628.97 + $16.05 x each $1,000 value $648.47 + $16.55 x each $1,000 value $1,029.90 + $11.19 x each $1,000 value $1,062.23 + $11.53 x each $1,000 value $1,589.40 + $8.90 x each $1,000 value $1,638.89 + $9.17 x each $1,000 value Review Fee Temporary Electrical Services Miscellaneous Electrical Fees Multi-Family, Commercial and Industrial Fees: Fees based on value of work. Residential Fees - Single -Family and Duplex State Building Code Fee: Electrical Permit Fees1: Non-residential projects $1.00 to $500.00 Signs per each Mobile Homes Low Voltage Work (e.g., alarm systems; thermostats; computer, data, or phone lines; fiber optics, cable television, etc.) (4) Job Trailers $1,000,000.01 and up Building and Demolition Permit Fees1: Building Fees: (viii) (vii) (vi) (ii) (iii) (iv) (v) Base Fee/Valuation $1.00 to $500.00 Valuation $501.00 to $2,000.00 Valuation $2001.00 to 25,000.00 Valuation $25,001.00 to $50,000.00 Valuation $50,001.00 to $100,000.00 Valuation $100,001.00 to $500,000.00 Valuation $500,001.00 to $1,000,000.00 Valuation $1,000,001.00 and up Residential projects: Residential Photovoltaic (PV) Solar Panel Permit fee New Service - Single Family and Duplex Service Changes/New Circuits - Single Family and Duplex: Change up to 200 AMP Change over 200 AMP Any new circuits added to above price is per each up to a maximum of $80.00 Minimum fee for remodel/addition of new circuits without a service charge Inspection Fee For Condominium Conversions House Moving1 - minimum per hour Inspection Fee: Plumbing up to 3,000 sq ft Plumbing over 3,000 sq ft Mechanical up to 3,000 sq ft Mechanical over 3,000 sq ft Electrical up to 3,000 sq ft Electrical over 3,000 sq ft g. 1 This fee shall be $0 for Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU) that are through the City of Renton's Permit Ready ADU (PRADU) Program as they have already been reviewed. 1 Combination Building Permit fees are required for each new single family residential structure. 2 This fee shall be $0 for City of Renton Capital Improvement Projects or city funded projects. 3 This fee shall be $0 for City of Renton Capital Improvement Projects or city funded projects. 1 Exemption: Residential telephone communication systems, thermostats, security systems, and cable television installations are exempt from fees Initial Building Plan Check Fee2 Additional Building Plan Check Fee 6 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) City of Renton Fee Schedule 2025-2026 SECTION XII. DEVELOPMENT FEES (CONTINUED)2025 2026 1. h. (i)$196 $202 (ii)Building Permit Fees Building Permit Fees i. (i)$67 $69 (1)$27 $28 (2) Boiler or Compressor $27 $28 (3)$27 $28 (4) Ventilation/exhaust fan $27 $28 (5) Fuel Gas Piping (each gas piping system up to 6 outlets)$27 $28 (ii)$99 $102 (1)$46 $47 (2) Boiler or Compressor $99 $102 (3) Refrigeration System $99 $102 (4)$99 $102 (5) Incinerator: Installation or relocation of each $131 $135 (6)$46 $47 (7) Fuel Gas Piping (each gas piping system up to 6 outlets)$46 $47 j. (i) Residential - Plumbing Permit base fee plus itemized fees below: $67 $69 (1)$12 $12 (2) Water Service: For meter to house $12 $12 (3) Per fixture for repair or alteration of drainage or vent piping $12 $12 (4) Per drain for rainwater systems $12 $12 (5) Per lawn sprinkler system, includes backflow prevention $12 $12 (6) Per vacuum breaker or backflow protection device on tanks, vats, etc.$12 $12 (7) Per interceptor for industrial waste pretreatment $12 $12 (8) Fuel Gas Piping: (each gas piping system up to 6 outlets)$27 $28 (ii) Commercial or Multi-Family: Plumbing Permit base fee plus itemized fees below: $99 $102 (1)$20 $21 (2)$20 $21 (3)$20 $21 (4)$20 $21 (5)$20 $21 (6)$20 $21 (7)$20 $21 (8)$34 $35 (9)$99 $102 k. (i) (1)$327 $337 (2)$327 $337 (ii) (1)$99 $102 (2)$99 $102 (3)$65 $67 (4)$163 $168 (5)$99 $102 (6)$99 $102 l. (i) (1)$163 $168 (2)$163 $168 (3)$163 $168 (4)$175/hr $175/hr (ii) (1)40% 40% (2)50% 50% (3)$158/hr $158/hr (4)5% of Permit Fee 5% of Permit Fee (5)5% of Permit Fee 5% of Permit Fee (iii)2 X Permit Fee 2 X Permit Fee Decorative Flags fee is per entrance and valid until flag(s) are removed Roof, projecting, awning, canopy, marquee, and wall signs Freestanding ground and pole signs Temporary and Portable Signs: Per plumbing fixture (e.g., sink, shower, toilet, dishwasher, tub, etc.) or set of fixtures on one trap Water Service: For meter to building Mechanical Permit Fees: Residential - Mechanical Permit base fee plus itemized fees below: Commercial or Multi-Family - Mechanical Permit base fee plus itemized fees below: Miscellaneous Fees: Fuel Gas Piping: (each gas piping system up to 6 outlets) Medical Gas Piping: (each gas piping system up to 6 outlets) Sign Permit Fees1: Plumbing Permit Fees: Per fixture for repair or alteration of drainage or vent piping Per drain for rainwater systems Per lawn sprinkler system, includes backflow prevention Heating system (furnace, heat pump, suspended heater, fireplace, wood stove, etc.). A/C system (air conditioner, chiller or Air Handling Unit (VAV) including ducts and vents) Additional Plan Review Fees: Over three review cycles (percentage of plan review fee) Miscellaneous Plan Review: hourly fee. Within a manufactured home park Manufactured/Mobile Home Installation Fees1: Appliance or piece of equipment regulated by this code but not classed in other appliance categories, or for which no other fee is listed in this code Appliance or piece of equipment regulated by this code but not classed in other appliance categories, or for which no other fee is listed in this code Outside of a manufactured home park Building Fees: (Continued) WABO - Adult Family Home; Misc building inspection Commercial Hood: Installation of each served by a mechanical exhaust, including the ducts for such hood each Heating system (furnace, heat pump, suspended heater, fireplace, wood stove, etc.). A/C system (air conditioner, chiller or Air Handling Unit (VAV) including ducts and vents) Reinspection Fee; Misc building inspection Real Estate Directional Signs, pursuant to RMC 4-4-100J2, permit valid for a 12-months period Grand Opening Event Signs, pursuant to RMC 4-4-100J6d(i) Per plumbing fixture (e.g., sink, shower, toilet, dishwasher, tub, etc.) or set of fixtures on one trap Minimum Housing Inspection Per vacuum breaker or backflow protection device on tanks, vats, etc. Per interceptor for industrial waste pretreatment 3 This fee shall be $0 for City of Renton Capital Improvement Projects or city funded projects. 1 This fee shall be $0 for Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU) that are through the City of Renton's Permit Ready ADU (PRADU) Program as they have already been reviewed. 2 Applies to inspection performed on Saturdays, Sundays, observed City of Renton holidays, and non-holiday Monday-Fridays outside the hours of 7:00AM to 3:30PM Work commencing before permit Issuance: Where work for which the permit is required is started prior to obtaining the permit, a special investigation fee in an amount equal to twice the permit fee shall be charged. The special investigation fee shall be paid in addition to the required permit fees.3 Permanent Signs: Inspection Fees: Plan Review Fees3: Event Signs, pursuant to RMC 4-4-100J6d(ii) and (iii) per sign, per promotion A-Frame Signs, pursuant to RMC 4-4-100J5 Charge is for the first sign, all subsequent signs are $50.00 Commercial Property Real Estate Banner each sign permit is valid for 12 months. After hours inspection2 1 This fee shall be $0 for City of Renton Capital Improvement Projects or city funded projects. 1 Includes plan review and inspection fees for the foundation (electrical, plumbing, mechanical, sewer and water connection fees are in addition to the below amounts). Site Plan/Zoning Review1 Engineering Review1 Electrical, Plumbing, or Mechanical Permits (percentage of permit fee) 7 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) City of Renton Fee Schedule 2025-2026 SECTION XII. DEVELOPMENT FEES (CONTINUED)2025 2026 2. a. (i)$58 $60 (ii)$124 $128 (iii) (1)$6,083 $6,272 (2)$6,083 $6,272 (iv) (1)$577 $595 (2)$577 $595 (3)$577 $595 (v) (1)$3,057 $3,152 (2)$6,114 $6,304 (vi) (vii)$6,083 $6,272 (viii) (1)$3,825 $3,944 (2)$1,856 $1,914 (3)50% of Application Fee 50% of Application Fee (4)Application Fee Application Fee (ix)N/C N/C (x)$1,454 $1,499 (xii)$11,588 $11,947 (xiii)100% of cost 100% of cost (xiv)$1,856 $1,914 (xv)$1,856 $1,914 (xvi)$186 $192 (xvii)$6,268 $6,462 (xviii) Home Occupation Permit (Special)$230 $230 (xix)$186 $192 (xx)N/C N/C (xxi)$588 $606 (xxii)$1,268 $1,307 (xxiii) (1)$1,268 $1,307 (2)$3,763 $3,880 (3)$1,856 $1,914 (xxiv)$175 $180 (xxv) (1)$6,268 $6,462 (2)$3,134 $3,231 (3)$12,547 $12,936 (4)$6,268 $6,462 (5)50% of Application Fee 50% of Application Fee (6)Application Fee Application Fee (xxvi) (1)$6,268 $6,462 (2)$3,124 $3,221 (xxvii) (1)$588 $606 (2)$1,784 $1,839 (xxviii)N/C N/C (xxix)$6,083 $6,272 (xxx)$124 $128 (xxxi) (1)N/C N/C (2)$3,124 $3,221 (3)$3,763 $3,880 (4)$3,763 $3,880 (xxxii) (1)$4,402 $4,538 (2)$3,124 $3,221 (3)50% of Application Fee 50% of Application Fee (4)Application Fees Application Fees (xxxiii)$588 $606 (xxxiv)$3,124 $3,221 (xxxv) (1)$289 $298 (2)$289 $298 (xxxvi) (1)$124 $128 (2)$237 $244 (xxxvii)$1,536 $1,584 (xxxviii)$299 $308 (xxxix)$557 $574 100% of contract cost 100% of contract cost Modification (major) required new application and repayment of fee required Small Cell Permit, per site4 Special Permit (Hearing Examiner) Street Naming (Honorary) Substantial Development Permit Planned Urban Development: Preliminary Plan Final Plan Reasonable Use Exception: In conjunction with land use permit Stand alone Application Conditional Use Permit Variance Hearing Examiner Review Administrative Review Modification (minor, administrative) Site Development Plan (Site Plan or Master Plan which includes design review fee for projects subject to RMC 4-3- 100): Waiver or Modification of Code Requirements cost is per request Zoning Compliance Letter Installation Temporary Use Permits: Tier 1 Tier 2 Variance (per each variance requested) Administrative or Hearing Examiner Public Arts Exemption Rezone Routine Vegetation Management Permit without Critical Areas Shoreline-Related Permits: Shoreline Permit Exemption Major Plat Amendment Manufactured/Mobile Home Park: Tentative Preliminary Final Open Space Classification Request Plats: Preliminary Short Plat Final Short Plat Preliminary Plat Final Plat Minor Plat Amendment Development Agreement Environmental Impact Statement Cost include the coordination, review and appeal. Draft and Final3 Environmental Checklist Review General Land Use Review1,5: Additional Animals Permit Address Change Annexation: Less than 10 acres Administrative Appeal of: Hearing Examiner's Decision Administrative Decision Environmental Decision Binding Site Plan Code Text Amendment Comprehensive Plan Map or Text Amendment (each) Conditional Use Permit: Critical Areas Exemption Critical Areas Permit (xi)Critical Areas Review Fee: for those projects that propose impacts to critical areas and will be billed at the cost of contract biologist’s review.2 Lot Line Adjustment Environmental (SEPA) Addendum Fence Permit (special) Grading and Filling Permit (Hearing Examiner) Landscape Review Fee Legal Lot Segregation Lot Consolidation 10 acres or more Land Use Review Fees: HEX Revision (minor, administrative) Revision (major) Preliminary Final 8 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) City of Renton Fee Schedule 2025-2026 SECTION XII. DEVELOPMENT FEES (CONTINUED)2025 2026 2. a. b. (i)$175/hr $175/hr 1 Exception for Projects Vested in the County: For those projects that have vested to a land use permit under the development regulations of King County, the King County Land Use Review Fee Schedule shall apply, and is hereby adopted by reference. A copy of that fee schedule has been filed with the City Clerk and is available at the City Clerk’s office for public review. SECTION XII. DEVELOPMENT FEES (CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE) Permit review staff overtime (applies only if permit review is requested by the applicant to be performed on Saturdays, Sundays, observed City of Renton holidays, and non-holiday Monday-Fridays outside of the hours of city staff regular work schedule) Land Use Review Fees: (Continued) Miscellaneous Fees1: General Land Use Review1,5: (Continued) 5 This fee shall be $0 for City of Renton Capital Improvement Projects or city funded projects. 1 Exception for Projects Vested in the County: For those projects that have vested to a land use permit under the development regulations of King County, the King County Land Use Review Fee Schedule shall apply, and is hereby adopted by reference. A copy of that fee schedule has been filed with the City Clerk and is available at the City Clerk’s office for public review. 2 Per RMC 4-3-050F7, the City may charge and collect fees from any applicant to cover costs incurred by the City in review of plans, studies, monitoring reports and other documents related to evaluation of impacts to or hazards from critical areas and subsequent code-required monitoring. 3 When the City is the lead agency for a proposal requiring an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) determines that the EIS shall be prepared, the City may charge and collect a reasonable fee from any applicant to cover costs incurred by the City in preparing the EIS. The ERC shall advise the applicant(s) of the projected costs for the EIS prior to actual preparation; the applicant shall post bond or otherwise ensure payment of such costs. The ERC may determine that the City will contract directly with a consultant for preparation of an EIS, or a portion of the EIS, and may bill such costs and expenses directly to the applicant. Such consultants shall be selected by mutual agreement of the City and applicant after a call for proposals. If a proposal is modified so that an EIS is no longer required, the ERC shall refund any fees collected under this subsection which remain after incurred costs are paid. The City may collect a reasonable fee from an applicant to cover the cost of meeting the public notice requirements of this Title relating to the applicant’s proposal. The City shall not collect a fee for performing its duties as a consulted agency. The City may charge any person for copies of any document prepared under this Title, and for mailing the document, in a manner provided by chapter 42.17 RCW. 4 Prior to issuance of a small cell permit, the applicant shall pay the actual administrative expenses incurred by the City that are directly related to the City's review of the application, including plan inspection, and approval, as authorized by RCW 35.21.860(1)(b), as may be amended. 9 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) City of Renton Fee Schedule 2025-2026 2025 2026 3. a. (i) Grade and Fill Quantity Cleared or Disturbed Area < 50 cy < 500 sf 50 cy - 499 cy 500 sf - < 3/4 acre 500 cy - 4,999 cy 3/4 ac - < 1 ac 5,000 cy - 49,999 cy 1 ac - < 2.5 ac 50,000 cy - 99,999 cy 2.5 ac - < 5 ac 100,000 cy and larger 5 ac and larger (1) (a)N/A N/A (b)$536 $553 (c)$722 $744 (d)$1,083 $1,117 (f)$1,443 $1,488 (e)$1,804 $1,860 (2) (a)N/A N/A (b)$516 $532 (c)$1,031 $1,063 (d)$1,371 $1,414 (f)$2,742 $2,827 (e)$4,114 $4,242 (3)1.5 x Review/Intake Fee 1.5 x Review/Intake Fee (4)1.5 x Review/Intake Fee 1.5 x Review/Intake Fee (ii) (1)6% of cost 6% of cost (2)$9,000 + 5% over $150,000 $9,000 + 5% over $150,000 (3)$17,500 + 4% over $350,000 $17,500 + 4% over $350,000 (iii)0.5% of cost 0.5% of cost (iv) $289 $298 (2)$1,753 $1,807 (v)$3,093 $3,189 b. (i) (1)$1,155 $1,191 (2)$2,320 $2,392 (3)$4,640 $4,784 (ii) (1)15% of total 15% of total (2)10% of total 10% of total (3)5% of total 5% of total (iii)$866 $893 c. (i) (1) (a)$5,025 $5,025 (b)$671 $671 (c)$4,025 $4,025 (2) (a)$25,125 $25,125 (b)$3,355 $3,355 (c)$20,125 $20,125 (3) (a)$40,200 $40,200 (b)$5,368 $5,368 (c)$32,200 $32,200 1 Fees are based on the amount covered by the Latecomers'. 2 The administration and collection fee is deducted from each individual latecomer fee payment and the balance forwarded to the holder of the latecomer’s agreement pursuant to RMC 9-5, Tender of Fee. Water service fee3 Fire sprinkler service fee 1,2 Wastewater fee3 1-1/2 inch: SECTION XII. DEVELOPMENT FEES (CONTINUED) Site Work, Utilities, and Right of Way Fees: Site Work and Civil Construction Fees3,4,5,9: Tier 0 1 2 3 4 Clearing, Grading, Excavation, and Mining Permits and License Fees: Fees shall be based on the highest tier triggered. Civil construction plan review and inspection fees 6,7,8: Plan Revision following Permit Issuance: (1)Minor (Results in a change 10% or less than the cost of improvements 7. Excludes minor adjustments that are approved by the City to be shown on record drawings.) Major (Results in a change of greater than 10% of the cost of improvements 7.) Annual Licenses of Solid Waste Fills Review Fee1,2: $150,000.00 or less Over $150,000.00 but less than $350,000.00 $350,000.00 and over Site Plan/Zoning Review and Inspection Fee6,7 1 The fee for a grading license authorizing additional work to that under a valid license shall be the difference between the fee paid for the original license and the fee shown for the entire project. 2 Any unused fee may be carried forward to the next year. If any work is done before the license is issued, the grading license fee shall be doubled. 3 All developers, municipal or quasi-municipal entities, or utility corporations or companies, except those specifically exempted, shall pay fees under this Section. Exempted entities include City- franchised cable TV, cable modem, natural gas, telecommunications, and electrical power. 4 Includes three (3) review cycles. Additional reviews will be charged $1,700 each. Multi-family: 2 units, Duplexes, & Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU)1 $50,000 or less Wastewater fee3 2 inch: Water service fee3 Water service fee3 Segregation processing fee, if applicable $200,000 and over Tier 4 Tier 5 Over $50,000 but less than $200,000 5/8 x 3/4 inch and 1 inch: Water and Wastewater System Development Charges (SDC): Utility System Development Charges (SDC): Latecomers' Agreement Application Fees1,3: Processing fee2 (Nonrefundable) $50,000 or less Over $50,000 but less than $200,000 $200,000 and over Wet weather (annual fee) 5 If deemed necessary by the City in its sole discretion, the City will contract with one or more consultants to provide plan reviews and/or inspections with the related costs and expenses payable by the applicant. 6 The fee shall be based up percentage of the estimated cost of improvements. 7 Cost of improvements shall be based on the City's bond quantity worksheet and shall include all project related improvements outside of the building envelopes, including, but not limited to, all costs required to construct the following: paved parking lots, private sidewalks or walkways; private and public storm water management facilities; temporary erosion and sedimentation control facilities; water quality facilities; public and private streets; public and private sanitary sewers; public water main improvements; required off-site street, bike and pedestrian improvements; street lighting improvements; required landscaping and street tree improvements; and site grading and mobilization costs. The applicant may elect to submit a separate, itemized cost estimates for each item of improvement subject to the approval by the City. 9 This fee shall be $0 for City of Renton Capital Improvement Projects or city funded projects. Project shall pay for site inspection services at actual cost. 8 Fifty Percent (50%) of the fee is due at Civil Construction Permit Application and the remaining shall be due prior to permit issuance. 3 This fee shall be $0 for City of Renton Capital Improvement Projects or city funded projects. Fire sprinkler service fee 1,2 Wastewater fee3 Fire sprinkler service fee 1,2 Solid Waste Fills Review Fee1: Inspection/Issuance Fee: Review/Intake Fee: Tier 0 (no permit required) 5 New or Replaced Hard Surface < 500 sf 500 sf - 4,999 sf 5,000 sf - < 1 ac 1 ac - < 2.5 ac 2.5 ac - < 5 ac 5 ac and larger Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 Tier 0 (no permit required) Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 10 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) City of Renton Fee Schedule 2025-2026 2025 2026 3. c. (4) (a)$80,400 $80,400 (b)$10,736 $10,736 (c)$64,400 $64,400 (5) (a)$125,625 $125,625 (b)$16,776 $16,776 (c)$100,625 $100,625 (6) (a)$251,250 $251,250 (b)$33,551 $33,551 (c)$201,250 $201,250 (7) (a)$402,000 $402,000 (b)$53,682 $53,682 (c)$322,000 $322,000 (ii) (1)$2,350 $2,350 (3)$0.940 per sq foot $0.940 per sq foot (iii)$840 + administrative costs $840 + administrative costs (iv) d. (i) (1) (a)$50 $50 (c)Time and materials Time and materials (d)$275 $275 (e)$95 $95 (f)$250 $250 (g)$560 $560 (h)$1,025 $1,025 (i)$80 $80 (k)$185 $185 (n)Time and materials Time and materials (o)$50 $50 (p)$200 $200 (2) (a) (i)$2,875 $2,875 (ii)$400 $400 (b) (i)$2,935 $2,935 (ii)$400 $400 (c) (i)$2,875 $2,875 (ii)$460 $460 (d) (i)$4,605 $4,605 (ii)$750 $750 1 Based upon the size of the fire sprinkler service (NOT detector bypass meter) 2 Unless a separate fire sprinkler service is provided, the system development charge(s) shall be based upon the size of the meter installed and a separate Fire sprinkler service fee will not be charged. 3 Any parcel that currently has water and or sewer service is eligible for a prorated system development charge is eligible for credit of the existing connection. Fee(s) based upon meter(s) proposed for final project will be reduced by the fee(s) based upon meter existing on site. 4 The applicant shall pay the City’s administrative costs for the preparation, processing and recording of the partial payment of the fee(s). If the same segregation is used for more than one utility’s special assessment district, and/or latecomer’s charge, then only one administrative fee is collected. 5 Temporary connection may be granted for a one-time, temporary, short-term use of a portion of the property for a period not to exceed three (3) consecutive years. Fee shall be paid annually (non- prorated), and shall be nonrefundable, nontransferable (from one portion of the property to another) and shall not constitute a credit to the system development charge due at the time of permanent use of the utility system. The application for temporary connection shall consist of a detailed plan and a boundary line of the proposed development service area for use in the fee determination. $2,000 deposit + time and materials $250 + $0.15 per lineal foot Cost of test + $70 processing fee Cost of test + $70 processing fee $2,000 deposit + time and materials $250 + $0.15 per lineal foot $0.940 per sq foot $0.940 per sq foot 30% of SDC $60 deposit + time and materials $60 deposit + time and materials Fire sprinkler service fee 1,2 Wastewater fee3 Water service fee3 Fire sprinkler service fee 1,2 Wastewater fee3 Water service fee3 Temporary Utility Connection5: (2) Utility SDC Segregation Request4 (1) Utility Construction Permit Fees: Water Construction Permit Fees: 30% of SDC 30% of SDC 30% of SDC 30% of SDC 30% of SDCWater Fee; Annual fee equal to thirty percent (30%) of the current SDC applicable to the size of the temporary water meter(s). (3) Storm Water Fee; Fee equal to thirty percent (30%) of the current SDC applicable to that portion of the property. Water service fee3 6 inch: Wastewater Fee; Annual fee equal to thirty percent (30%) of the current SDC applicable to the size of the temporary domestic water meter(s). Storm Water System Development Charges (SDC): New single family residence (including mobile/manufactured homes) & Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) Site Work, Utilities, and Right of Way Fees: (Continued) Utility System Development Charges (SDC): (Continued) (2) Water main cut and cap Installation of stub service and meter setter only. Water meter installation fees – City installed: Installation fees for ring and cover castings (l) (m) Water quality/inspection/purity tests Water turn ons/offs after hours New water line chlorination fee. Fee plus $0.15 per lineal foot for any footage after the first two hundred fifty (250) lineal feet Water meter tests for 3/4” to 2" meter Water Testing, Construction, and Administration Fees: Drop in meter only Drop in meter only Drop in meter only Drop in meter only 3/4” meter installed by City outside City limits (b) (j) Water meter tests on meters 2" or larger Specialty water tests (lead, copper, etc) Water main connections Installation of isolation valve. Open and close fire hydrants for fire flow tests conducted by others. Water service disconnection (cut at main) Meter resets Repair of damage to service Miscellaneous water installation fees. Service size reductions Installation of stub service and meter setter only. 3/4” meter installed by City within City limits. Fire sprinkler service fee 1,2 Wastewater fee3 8 inch: Addition to existing single family residence greater than 500 square feet (including mobile/manufactured homes) Fee not to exceed $2,350 3 inch: Water service fee3 All other uses charge per square foot of new impervious surface, but not less than $2,350 Fire sprinkler service fee 1,2 Wastewater fee3 4 inch: Installation of stub service and meter setter only. 1” meter installed by the City. Installation of stub service and meter setter only. 1-1/2" meter installed by the City. SECTION XII. DEVELOPMENT FEES (CONTINUED) 11 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) City of Renton Fee Schedule 2025-2026 2025 2026 3. d. (e) (i)$4,735 $4,735 (ii)$950 $950 (4) (a)$50 $50 (b) (i)$500 $500 (ii)$2,000 $2,000 (iii)$25 $25 (c) (i)$50 $50 (ii)$250 $250 (ii) (1) (a)$375 $375 (b)$375 $375 (2) (a)$375 $375 (b)$375 $375 (3) (a)$375 $375 (b)$375 $375 (4) (a)$375 $375 (b)$375 $375 (5) (a)$375 $375 (b)$375 $375 (6)$375 $375 $375 $375 (iv)$525 $525 (v) (1)$500 $500 (2)$1,000 $1,000 e. (i) (1)$175/hr $175/hr (2) (a)$690 $710 (b)$690 + Time and Materials $710 + Time and Materials (c)$690 $710 (3) (a)Time and Materials Time and Materials (b)$140 $140 (c)$880 + Time and Materials $910 + Time and Materials (i) (1)$715.38 $715.38 (2)$1,430.76 $1,430.76 (3)$2,146.14 $2,146.14 (4)$2,861.51 $2,861.51 (5)$3,576.89 $3,576.89 (ii)Actual cost Actual cost (e)$270 $270 (f)Actual cost Actual cost (4) (a)$10.00 $10.00 (b)$20.00 $20.00 (c)$30.00 $30.00 (ii) (1)$380 $390 (2)$720 $740 (3)$375 $375 $220 $220 plus King County sewer rate on discharged amount plus King County sewer rate on discharged amount 2” meter installed by the City. Hydrant Meter fees: Hydrant meter permit fee Deposits: (3)Water meter processing fees – Applicant installed: For meters larger than 2”, the applicant must provide materials and install the meter. Installation of stub service and meter setter only. SECTION XII. DEVELOPMENT FEES (CONTINUED) Site Work, Utilities, and Right of Way Fees: (Continued) Utility Construction Permit Fees: (Continued) Drop in meter only Wastewater permit fee Street light system fee, per new connection to power system Utility Locate Refresh Fee (Fee is due each time excavator calls in for locate refresh during 45-day locate ticket) Ground water discharge (temporary connection to wastewater system for discharge of contaminated ground water over 50,000 gallons) Rate plus billed for current Renton and King County sewer rate on discharged amount (meter provided by property owner) Surface water permit fee Repair or modification of any of the above Surface water permit fee Commercial: Wastewater permit fee Surface water permit fee Industrial: Wastewater permit fee 3/4” meter and backflow prevention assembly. 3” meter and backflow prevention assembly. Deposit processing charge, nonrefundable. Meter rental (begins on day of pickup): 3/4” meter and backflow prevention assembly. Per month. 3” meter and backflow prevention assembly. Per month. Wastewater and Surface Water Construction Permit Fees: Residential: Wastewater permit fee All other work, permit fee plus staff time per hour 6 Other public agencies constructing utilities within City right-of-way Small Cell Master Lease Agreement including Site License Addendum and Small Cell Permits Master Lease Agreement Administrative Costs, Staff time per hour and/or cost of materials.6 Pole Reservation, per pole Administrative Fee, Base plus time and/or cost of materials.6 Large project locate Surface water permit fee Right of Way (ROW) Use Permits Fees1 Small work, including trenching less than 60 linear feet or installation of 6 or less utility poles Master Service Agreement Application Fee3 (7) Cut and Cap/Demolition Permit: Wastewater permit fee Surface water permit fee Reinspection for Wastewater or Surface Water Permits Franchise Permit Fees: 4,5 Standard locate Franchise Permit Fees: All other reimbursement Tier 2, conduit outside of planter strips excluding signalized intersection crossings, bridges and train tracks Short-Term ROW Permit Fees (duration 30 days or less)2,7: Public Reimbursement (any costs incurred by the City on behalf of the permit applicant for installation or operation of site equipment) All other fees6 Tier 1, Daily peak kWh <20 Tier 2, Daily peak kWh 21 - 40 Tier 3, Daily peak kWh 41 - 60 Tier 4, Daily peak kWh 61 - 80 Tier 5, Daily peak kWh >81 (d) Site License Addendum Rent Conduit Lease Rates per Lineal Foot (annual fee): Tier 1, conduit in existing planter strips Tier 3, conduit within signalized intersection crossings, bridges and train tracks Electrical service (annual fee) Single family residence, one unit only All other uses, excluding those listed 13 Wastewater or storm water service 12 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) City of Renton Fee Schedule 2025-2026 2025 2026 3. e. (iii) (1) (b) (i)$1,025 $1,025 (ii)$1,025 $1,025 (2) (i) (iv)$10 $10 f. (i)$290 $300 (ii)$290 $300 g. (i)$580 $600 (ii) (1)$870 $900 (2)$1,450 $1,490 (3)$2,320 $2,390 h. (i) (1) (a)$134/LF $138/LF (b)$159/LF $164/LF (ii)$163 $168 (iii)$163 $168 (iv)$158/hr $158/hr (v)$175/hr $175/hr (vi)$175/hr $175/hr (vii)Actual cost Actual cost (viii)$691 $712 3 Applies to inspections performed on Saturdays, Sundays, observed City of Renton holidays, and non-holiday Monday-Fridays outside the hours of 7:00am to 3:30pm. 4 Applies only if permit review is requested by the applicant to be performed on Saturdays, Sundays, observed City of Renton holidays, and non-holiday Monday-Fridays outside of the hours of city staff regular work schedule 5 Any work performed by City forces or under City contract on behalf of a permit applicant to repair damage to the City infrastructure or caused by the permit applicant or contractor under its control, or any and all roadway or right-of-way cleanup efforts performed by City forces or under City contract that resulted from the work performed by the permit applicant or contractors under its control. 2 Work and/or use of the right of way, including those associated with a Civil Construction Permit and excludes utilities from other public agencies and service providers which shall be considered under a franchise permit. 1 Bond required pursuant to RMC 9-10-5. 3 The fixed application fee established herein is intended to cover the City’s internal administrative costs in processing and administering the franchise. In addition to the fixed application fee, the City may require applicants to either directly pay or reimburse the City for external costs reasonably incurred to process the application and/or administer the franchise agreement. The City may require applicants to deposit funds in advance to cover legal and/or other professional services fees as they are incurred. 4 The City may decide to contract with a consultant to perform plan reviews and inspections and may bill such costs and expenses directly to the applicant. 5 If a franchise agreement does not specify the fee amount, the generic fee, as identified in this fee schedule, shall be collected. 6 Regular hours and standard after hour and overtime fees apply. 7A no fee permit may be issued for the following: individual homeowners performing work in street ROW for street tree or parking strip irrigation systems; residential moving pods or moving trucks provided that they are in the ROW for no more than three (3) days; use in CD zone provided ground disturbing activity is not proposed; and work associated with City of Renton capital improvement projects or City funded projects. 8 A no fee permit may be issued for the following: A public agency and when the proposed use of the right-of-way provides a direct service to the public (e.g., Metro applications for right-of-way for bus shelters); and work associated with City of Renton capital improvement projects or City funded projects. 9 Leasehold excise tax (LET) imposed pursuant to Chapter 82.29A RCW on leasehold interests for the use of real or personal public property shall be collected from the permittee at a rate established by the State of Washington. 10 Insurance Required: Public Liability and property damage insurance is also required pursuant to RMC 9-2-5B, Minimum Permit Requirements for Excess Right-of-Way Use. 11 Except those single family and two family uses that utilize right of way along a waterfront. 12 Right-of-way value shall be based on the assessed value of the land adjoining the property as established by the King County Assessor. 1 Unscheduled work includes, but is not limited to, site work that is found to be occurring, or did occur, for which an inspection was not scheduled. Fee is subject to be applied for each occurrence but does not replace a stop work order or other code violation as determined applicable by the City. The fee is in addition to any other applicable inspection fees. The fee may provide day of inspection at the discretion and availablility of the City inspector. 2 Applies only to those fees that are noted as time and materials and performed during city staff regular work schedule. Short-Term ROW Permit Fee + LET9 Short-Term ROW Permit Fee + LET9 $50 + LET9 $50 + LET9 0.5% x Value12 + LET9 0.5% x Value12 + LET9 0.5% x Value12 + LET9 0.5% x Value12 + LET9 (Sq Ft of addition / 1,160 sq ft) of Fee-in-lieu (Sq Ft of addition / 1,160 sq ft) of Fee-in-lieu Street with existing conveyance ditch Street with existing storm drainage main line (iii) 1 This fee shall be $0 for City of Renton Capital Improvement Projects or city funded projects. Within City Limits8; Short-Term ROW Permit Fee associated with use plus leasehold excise tax (LET)9 Service Installation Only Utility Extension per 100' of Length (Min 200' Length) All uses without public benefit; fee is a per month charge assessed annually based on property value 12 of land to be utilized, plus leasehold excise tax 9, if applicable. (a) Long Term ROW Permit Fees (duration over 30 days)2,13: SECTION XII. DEVELOPMENT FEES (CONTINUED) Site Work, Utilities, and Right of Way Fees: (Continued) Right of Way Use Permits Fees1 (Continued) King County ROW Permits/Inspections: Single family and two family uses11 Duration greater than thirty (30) days but no more than one (1) year: Duration greater than one (1) year8,10: (ii) 1 This fee shall be $0 for City of Renton Capital Improvement Projects or city funded projects. All other uses; fee is a per year charge of assessed value of land adjoining the property 12, plus leasehold excise tax9, if applicable. In no case less than $50.00. Processing and completion fee, payable upon Council approval of the vacation and upon administrative determination of appraised value of vacated right-of-way. Appraised Value of Vacated right-of-way: Street and Alley vacation Fees: The imposition, collection, payment and other specifics concerning this charge are detailed in chapter 9-14 RMC, Vacations.1 Release of easement fees: The imposition, collection, payment and other specifics concerning this charge are detailed in chapter 9-1 RMC, Easements.1 Filing fee Processing fee Filing fee 6 This fee shall be $0 for City of Renton Capital Improvement Projects or city funded projects. Project shall pay for site inspection services at actual cost. Less than $25,000 $25,000 to $75,000 Re-inspection Fee Over $75,000 Street Frontage Improvements Fee-In-Lieu: Miscellaneous Fees6: Public Works Reimbursement5 Standard or minor drainage adjustment review All eligible uses except Single Family Additions less than 1,160 sq ft: Single Family Additions less than 1,160 Sq Ft: Proportional share of the fee in lieu of all eligible uses fee based on square footage of addition. (2) Permit review staff overtime4 Regular Staff Review and Inspection Hours2 Inspection for Unscheduled Work 1 After hours inspection 3 Oversize Load Permits 13 This fee shall be $0 for City of Renton Capital Improvement Projects or city funded projects. 13 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) City of Renton Fee Schedule 2025-2026 2025 2026 4. 5.0% 5.0% 5. a. (i) (1)$4,728 $4,728 $0.00 (2)$0.00 $0.00 (ii) (1)$0.00 $0.00 (2)$0.00 $0.00 (iii) (1)$1,003 $1,003 $0.00 (2)$3,268 $3,268 $0.00 (iv)5% x School Impact Fee 5% x School Impact Fee b. ITE Land Use Codes (i)ITE LUC 220 See Footnote 5 See Footnote 5 (ii)ITE LUC 560 $4.79 $4.79 (iii)ITE LUC 936 $175.21 $175.21 (iv)ITE LUC 937 $211.59 $211.59 (v)ITE LUC 851 $207.87 $207.87 (vi)ITE LUC 565 $19.81 $19.81 (vii)ITE LUC 975 $14.58 $14.58 (viii)ITE LUC 912 $120.84 $120.84 (ix)ITE LUC 930 $68.10 $68.10 (x)ITE LUC 933 $180.23 $180.23 (xi)ITE LUC 934 $182.87 $182.87 (xii)ITE LUC 945 $89,966.30 $89,966.30 (xiii)ITE LUC 944 $87,536.72 $87,536.72 (xiv)ITE LUC 110 $6.36 $6.36 (xv)ITE LUC 710 $14.07 $14.07 (xvi)ITE LUC 492 $35.23 $35.23 (xvii)ITE LUC 157 $2.57 $2.57 (xiii)ITE LUC 155 $2.33 $2.33 (xix)ITE LUC 156 $10.12 $10.12 (xx)ITE LUC 154 $1.61 $1.61 (xxi) ITE LUC 610 $7.22 $7.22 (xxii) ITE LUC 310 $4,216.05 $4,216.05 (xxiii)ITE LUC 130 $5.62 $5.62 (xxiv) ITE LUC 140 $10.36 $10.36 (xxv)ITE LUC 420 $2,286.67 $2,286.67 (xxvi) ITE LUC 720 $36.23 $36.23 (xxvii) ITE LUC 240 $7,068.11 $7,068.11 (xxviii)ITE LUC 320 $3,001.25 $3,001.25 (xxix) ITE LUC 445 $786.04 $786.04 (xxx)ITE LUC 220 $6,184.59 $6,184.59 (xxxi) ITE LUC 620 $1,285.11 $1,285.11 (xxvii) ITE LUC 932 $56.02 $56.02 (xxxiii)ITE LUC 151 $1.50 $1.50 (xxxiv)ITE LUC 251 $3,694.69 $3,694.69 (xxxv)ITE LUC 820 $24.37 $24.37 (xxxvi)ITE LUC 210 $11,485.67 $11,485.67 (xxxvii)ITE LUC 850 $63.17 $63.17 (xxxiii)ITE LUC 215 $6,987.79 $6,987.79 (xxxix)ITE LUC 150 $3.29 $3.29 (xxxx)$8,031.94 $8,031.94 c. (i)$3,276.44 $3,276.44 (ii)$2,659.70 $2,659.70 (iii)$2,531.21 $2,531.21 (iv)$2,222.84 $2,222.84 (v)$2,325.63 $2,325.63 d. (i)$421.98 $421.98 $779.24 (ii)$579.41 $579.41 $1,099.68 (iii)$346.22 $346.22 $669.37 (iv)$1,052.00 $1052.00 $2,173.16 (v)$0.14 $0.14 $0.28 Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU)5, per dwelling Church, per sq foot Technology Surcharge Fee General Light Industrial, per sq foot High-Cube Warehouse: Cold Storage, per sq foot2 High-Cube Warehouse: Fulfillment Center (NS), per sq foot2 Impact Fees: Coffee/Donut Shop, no drive up, per sq foot SECTION XII. DEVELOPMENT FEES (CONTINUED) Transportation Impact Fees1,3,4,5: School Impact Fees: Issaquah School District Single Family Fee, per dwelling Multi Family, Duplex, & Accessory Dwelling Fee (ADU), per dwelling Kent School District Single Family Fee, per dwelling Multi Family, Duplex, & Accessory Dwelling Fee (ADU), per dwelling Renton School District Single Family Fee, per dwelling Multi Family, Duplex, & Accessory Dwelling Fee (ADU)1, per dwelling School Impact Fee Administration An additional technology surcharge shall be required for all fees included in the following Subsections of Section XII, Development Fees, of the City of Renton Fee Schedule Brochure: Subsection 1, Building Fees; Subsection a, except for appeals, critical areas review fee, and direct EIS costs, of subsection 2, Land Use Review Fees; Subsections a, b, c(iii), d, and e, except Master Franchise/Small Cell Permit Application Fee and Long Term ROW Permit Fees (duration over one year), of subsection 3, Site Work, Utilities, and Right of Way Fees; and Section XIII, Fire Department Fire Marshall Fees 1 Per House Bill 1337, effective 7/1/25, the impact fee for an ADU shall be capped at 50% of the impact fee that would be imposed on the principal unit, as defined in RCW 36.70A.696. If there are multiple principal unit types on a lot, the impact fee for the ADU shall be based on the principal unit on the lot that has the lowest impact fee. Coffee/Donut Shop, with drive up, per sq foot Convenience market - 24 hour, per sq foot Daycare, per sq foot Drinking Place, per sq foot Drive-in bank, per sq foot Fast food, no drive-up, per sq foot Fast Casual Dining with 30 seat max, incl. only walk-up window, per sq foot Park Impact Fees: 2 Impact fees include a Passenger Car-Equivalent (PCE) factor. 3 Applied fee reductions based on uses by percentage of Net New PM Peak Hour Person Vehicle Trip: Early Learning Facilities (i.e. Daycare) is 20% and Commercial/Retail/Industrial is 88.97% except uses with PCE factors which will remain at 100%. 4 All uses within the Center Downtown (CD) Zone shall be reduced to 20% of the assessed transportation impact fee. High-Cube Warehouse: Parcel Hub, per sq foot2 High-Cube Warehouse: Transload/Short-Term, per sq foot2 Industrial Park, per sq foot2 Multifamily Housing, per dwelling Self-service Storage, per sq foot Fast food, with drive-up, per sq foot 5 ADU fees shall be $6,184.59 per dwelling until 6/30/2025. Per House Bill 1337, effective 7/1/25, the impact fee for an ADU shall be capped at 50% of the impact fee that would be imposed on the principal unit, as defined in RCW 36.70A.696. If there are multiple principal unit types on a lot, the impact fee for the ADU shall be based on the principal unit on the lot that has the lowest impact fee. Single family, per dwelling unit Multi-family: 2 units, Duplexes, & Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU)1 , per dwelling unit Motel, per room Gas station with convenience store, per pump Gas station, per pump General office, per sq foot Health/fitness club, per sq foot Hospital, per sq foot Hotel, per room Manufacturing, per sq foot2 Marina, per boat berth Medical office, per sq foot Mobile home, per dwelling Movie theater, per seat Nursing home, per bed Restaurant: sit-down, per sq foot Senior housing - detached, per dwelling Shopping center, per sq foot Single family house, per dwelling Supermarket, per sq foot Net New PM Peak Hour Person Vehicle Trip (Proposed - Existing), per PM Peak Hour Person Vehicle Trip Townhouses, per dwelling Warehouse, per sq foot2 1 ITE LUC: Institutue of Transportation Engineers Land Use Codes defined in the 11th Edition ITE Trip Generation Handbook Multi-family: 5 or more units, per dwelling unit Mobile home, per dwelling unit Fire Impact Fees: Residential - single family (detached dwellings & duplexes), per dwelling unit Residential - multi family & Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU)1, per dwelling unit Multi-family: 3 or 4 units, per dwelling unit Hotel/motel/resort, per room Medical care facility, per bed Office, per sq foot 1 Per House Bill 1337, effective 7/1/25, the impact fee for an ADU shall be capped at 50% of the impact fee that would be imposed on the principal unit, as defined in RCW 36.70A.696. If there are multiple principal unit types on a lot, the impact fee for the ADU shall be based on the principal unit on the lot that has the lowest impact fee. 14 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) City of Renton Fee Schedule 2025-2026 2025 2026 5. (vi)$0.61 $0.61 $1.28 (vii)$0.66 $0.66 $1.19 (viii)$0.42 $0.42 $0.90 (ix)$1.44 $1.44 $2.32 (x)$0.05 $0.05 $0.10 (xi)$0.24 $0.24 $0.49 (xii)$28.02 $28.02 $63.96 (xiii)$0.13 $0.13 $0.27 e.$560 $560 f. (i)$100 $100 (ii)$100 $100 6. a.$1,000.00 $1,000.00 b. (i)$225.00 $225.00 (ii)$500.00 $500.00 c. (i) (1)$235,836.73 $235,836.73 (2)$227,510.20 $227,510.20 (3)$253,469.39 $253,469.39 (4)$406,775.51 $406,775.51 (5)$495,673.47 $495,673.47 (ii) (1)$167,265.31 $167,265.31 (2)$156,489.80 $156,489.80 (3)$170,204.08 $170,204.08 (4)$296,571.43 $296,571.43 (5)$368,326.53 $368,326.53 (iii) (1)$135,428.57 $135,428.57 (2)$124,653.06 $124,653.06 (3)$133,469.39 $133,469.39 (4)$247,591.84 $247,591.84 (5)$314,448.98 $314,448.98 (iv) (1)$201,551.02 $201,551.02 (2)$193,224.49 $193,224.49 (3)$211,836.73 $211,836.73 (4)$352,897.96 $352,897.96 (5)$432,000.00 $432,000.00 (iv) (1)$270,122.45 $270,122.45 (2)$261,795.92 $261,795.92 (3)$292,653.06 $292,653.06 (4)$458,204.08 $458,204.08 (5)$556,897.96 $556,897.96 SECTION XIII. FIRE DEPARMENT FIRE MARSHAL FEES (RFA)2025 2026 a. (i)$50 $50 $60 (ii)$50 + 2% of the cost $50 $75 + 2% of the cost (iii)$75 + 2% of the cost $200 $100 + 2% of the cost (iv)$200 + 1.5% of the cost $200 $250 + 1.5% of the cost (v)$450 + 1.2% of the cost $450 $525 + 1.2% of the cost (vi)$950 + .75% of the cost $950 $1,100 + .75% of the cost (vii) (viii) (ix) (x) (1)N/C N/C (2)$75 $75 (3)$150 $150 (xi)$35 $35 b. $150 $150 $185 $75 $75 $92.50 (iii)$250 $250 $325 $175 $175 $200 $150 $150 $175 $250 $250 $300 20% of plan review fee - 20% of plan review fee - Multifamily Tax Exemption Application Tree Fee in lieu, credit replacement, and/or credit supplement Per diameter inch measured at 4.5 feet above grade Labor cost for each 2" caliper (or 6ft tall) tree to be planted Miscellaneous Fees Fire plan review and inspection fees: Restaurant/lounge, per sq foot Independent Fee Calculation Review (or unless otherwise established by School District or Renton Regional Fire Authority)1 SECTION XII. DEVELOPMENT FEES (CONTINUED) Impact Fees: (Continued) Medical/dental office, per sq foot Retail, per sq foot Leisure facilities, per sq foot Industrial/manufacturing, per sq foot Church, per sq foot Education, per student Special public facilities, per sq foot 1 Per House Bill 1337, effective 7/1/25, the impact fee for an ADU shall be capped at 50% of the impact fee that would be imposed on the principal unit, as defined in RCW 36.70A.696. If there are multiple principal unit types on a lot, the impact fee for the ADU shall be based on the principal unit on the lot that has the lowest impact fee. (iv) Construction permit: Operational fire code permit (issued in accordance with Section 105.6 of the IFC) fee is yearly (includes items such as fire special events, covered stages, mobile food facilities, hot works, etc.) Permits for Mobile food facilities that have passed a fire and life safety inspection in another jurisdiction that has reciprocity with Renton RFA Hazardous materials and HPM facilities yearly (ADD & High Piled Storage) Late Payment Penalty $0 to $249.99 $250.00 to $999.99 $1,000.00 to $4,999.99 $5,000.00 to $49,999.99 $50,000.00 to $99,999.99 $100,000.00 and above Construction Re-inspection. Fee is per hour with a 2 hour minimum. The minimum maywill be assessed if the requested inspection does not meet the approval of the inspector. Violation/Second Re-Inspection after 30-day period (whenever 30 days or more have passed since Fire Department notification of a violation, which required a first re-inspection, and such violation has not been remedied or granted an extension) Third and subsequent re-Inspection/Pre-Citation Follow-Up Inspection when re-inspections are required beyond the first and second re-inspections Preventable Fire alarm fee: First, second, and third preventable alarms Fourth and fifth preventable alarms in a calendar year, fee is per each alarm. Sixth preventable alarm and successive preventable alarms in a calendar year, fee is per each alarm. Fire Permit type: (i) (ii) 3 The bedroom count utilized to calculate the cash payment in lieu shall be based on the bedroom count majority developed on-site. If the bedroom counts developed on-site are equally divided (e.g. 50% 1 bedrooms and 50% 2 bedrooms), the higher bedroom count shall be utilized for calculation. The bedroom number selection for payment calculation shall also comply with RMC 4-4-155.D, Number of Bedrooms. 1 This fee shall be $0 for City of Renton Capital Improvement Projects or city funded projects. 4-Bedroom Zip Code 98057 Studio 1-Bedroom 2-Bedroom 3-Bedroom 4-Bedroom Zip Code 98058 Impact Fee Deferral Administration: Each Lot, Single Family Dwelling, or Condominium Each Multi-family Building Affordable Housing Cash Payment in Lieu1,2,3: Zip Code 98055 Studio 1-Bedroom 2-Bedroom 3-Bedroom 4-Bedroom Studio 1-Bedroom 2-Bedroom 3-Bedroom Zip Code 98056 Studio 1-Bedroom 2-Bedroom 3-Bedroom 4-Bedroom Zip Code 98059 1 The cash payment in lieu is calculated by multiplying the fee shown in the table by the number of affordable housing units requested for cash payment in lieu of on-site development. 2 The cash payment in lieu shall be based on the zipcode of the project site. If the project site is located in a zipcode not listed in the table above, the closest abutting zipcode shall be utilized to determine payment calculation. 4-Bedroom Studio 1-Bedroom 2-Bedroom 3-Bedroom 15 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) City of Renton Fee Schedule 2025-2026 (vii)$200 $200 $300 (ix)WFC Current Wage and Equipment Rate WFC Current Wage and Equipment Rate (x)$25 $25 See Fire plan review and construction permit fees See Fire plan review and construction permit fees $175 $175 $200 5% 5% Min. $75 Min. $75 Min. $100 $250 $250 $325 (xi) (viii) Underground tank removal or abandonment-in- place permit (residential) (vi) (v) Other requested inspection when not required by the fire code, or when requested for after hours inspections. Fee is per hour with a minimum 2 hours when approved by the Fire Marshal, such as home daycares. RFA technology surcharge fee applied to Fire Department Fire Marshal Fees, subsection a. (i, ii, iii, iv, v, vi) and subsection b. (iii) NSF check fees Underground tank removal permit (commercial) Hazardous production materials permit (for businesses storing, handling, or using hazardous production materials as regulated in the fire code) permit is yearly (VIII) Non-emergency Billable Services (ie: boat assists, etc) Rates published at: www.washingtonfirechiefs.com 16 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) City of Renton Fee Schedule 2025-2026 2025 2026 3. a.RMC 2-9-8.C $73 $73 i. RMC 2-9-8.C.1 $73 $73 ii. RMC 2-9-8.C.2 $73 $73 iii. RMC 2-9-8.C.3 $73 $73 iv. RMC 2-9-8.C.4 $73 $73 v. RMC 2-9-8.C.5 $73 $73 vi. RMC 2-9-8.C.6 $73 $73 vii. RMC 2-9-8.C.7 $73 $73 viii. RMC 2-9-8.C.8 $73 $73 ix. RMC 2-9-8.C.9 $73 $73 x. RMC 2-9-8.C.10 $73 $73 xi. RMC 2-9-8.C.11 $73 $73 xii. RMC 2-9-8.C.12 $73 $73 xiii. RMC 2-9-8.C.13 $73 $73 xiv. RMC 2-9-8.C.14 $73 $73 xv. RMC 2-9-8.C.15 $73 $73 xvi. RMC 2-9-8.C.16 $73 $73 xvii. RMC 2-9-8.C.17 $73 $73 xviii. RMC 2-9-8.C.17 $73 $73 b.RMC 4-5-070.C.102 $49 $49 c.RMC 5-4-1 $49 $49 d.RMC 6-14-22 $50 $50 i. RMC 6-14-3 $50 $50 ii. RMC 6-14-4 $50 $50 iii. RMC 6-14-5 $50 $50 iv. RMC 6-14-6 $50 $50 v. RMC 6-14-7 $50 $50 vi. RMC 6-14-8 $50 $50 vii. RMC 6-14-10 $50 $50 viii. RMC 6-14-11 $50 $50 ix. RMC 6-14-12 $50 $50 x. RMC 6-14-13 $50 $50 xi. RMC 6-14-14 $50 $50 xii. RMC 6-14-15 $50 $50 xiii. RMC 6-14-16 $50 $50 xiv. RMC 6-14-17 $50 $50 xv. RMC 6-14-18 $50 $50 xvi. RMC 6-14-19 $50 $50 xvii. RMC 6-14-20 $50 $50 e.RMC 6-6-1.A $49 $49 f.RMC 6-6-5.A $49 $49 g.RMC 9-17-10 $100 $100 h.RMC 9-3-5 $42 $42 i.RMC 9-3-7 $42 $42 j.RMC 9-3-10 $122 $122 k.RMC 9-3-26 $42 $42 l.RMC 9-3-31 $42 $42 m.RMC 10-12-25 $67 $67 n.RMC 10-12-26 $42 $42 o.RMC 10-12-27 $42 $42 p.RMC 10-12-28.C $42 $42 q.RMC 10-12-28.D $42 $42 r.RMC 10-12-28.E.1 $42 $42 s.RMC 10-12-28.E.2 $42 $42 t.RMC 10-12-28.F $42 $42 u.RMC 10-12-28.G $42 $42 v.RMC 10-12-28.H $42 $42 w.RMC 10-2-5 $47 $47 $48 $48 Effect of Schedule. This schedule establishes default base penalties for violations of the Renton Municipal Code that are issued as infractions under the authority of RCW 7.80 RCW, but these penalties do not include any state-imposed statutory assessments. Except as otherwise prohibited by law or court rule, a court with jurisdiction over the infraction may impose on a defendant a lesser penalty in an individual case. Provided that, whenever the base penalty plus mandatory statutory assessments results in a total payment that is not an even dollar amount, the base penalty is deemed to be amended to a higher amount which produces the next greatest even dollar total. Penalties Established by Court Rule or Specific Penalty Established by Law. This schedule does not apply to penalties established by state or local court rule or to a penalty that is established in law with a specific amount (i.e. ordinance or statute setting a penalty equal to a specified amount rather than a penalty up to a maximum amount). To the extent a penalty scheduled herein conflicts with a state or local court rule or a penalty that is established in law, this schedule shall be deemed preempted by the court rule or penalty established in law. Owner to Maintain Premises Free of Litter Litter of Vacant Lots Unsafe Use of Scooter Prohibiting Distribution of Handbills Where Properly Posted Distributing Handbills at Inhabited Private Premises Dropping Litter from Aircraft Posting Notices Prohibited Litter on Occupied Private Property Truck Loads Causing Litter Litter in Lakes and Fountains Throwing/Distributing Commercial Handbills in Public Places Placing Handbills on Vehicles Depositing Handbills on Uninhabited/Vacant Premises Smoking in Park Operating Scooter When Prohibited Use of Scooter Where Prohibited Use of Scooter Without a Helmet No Reflectors on Scooter No Muffler on Scooter Scooter Operator Under Age 13 Sweeping Litter in Gutters Merchants’ Duty Glass Container in Park with Swimming Area Group Rally/Special Use Permit Parking & Mooring Violation City Events Violation Alcohol in Park SCUBA Diving in Park Camping/Overnight Stay in Parks Metal Detecting Litter in Public Spaces Placement of Litter in Receptacles All other violations identified by Renton Municipal Code as an infraction not listed or otherwise specified by court rule or law. Animal Control – No License Littering Animal Control – Animal at Large Animal Control – Animal/Fowl Habitual Noise Violation of ATV Ordinance Inattentive Driving Truck Route Violation Avoiding Intersection Encroachment on Public Property Negligent Operation of Watercraft Speed Regulations of Watercraft Obstructions of Waterways Equipment Numbering Violation Violation of Rules of the Road Litter Thrown By Persons in Vehicles Violation of Park Rules (Civil Infraction) Possession/Sale/Discharge of Fireworks SECTION XIV. MONETARY PENALTY SCHEDULE FOR INFRACTIONS ISSUED UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF CHAPTER 7.80 RCW Penalties: The following violations shall carry the following listed default base penalty, not including statutory assessments: 1. 2. Fire/Barbeque in Park Activities Prohibited in a Park Disregard Park Trail Sign Unauthorized Vehicle in a Park Operating Motorized Vehicle on Park Trail Dismount Zone Violation Speeding on Trails Vehicle/Boat Repair in Park Racing in Park 17 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan 2024-2025 through 2030-2031 June 2025 Kent School District No. 415 12033 SE 256th Street Kent, Washington 98030-6643 (253) 373-7526 BOARD of DIRECTORS Ms. Meghin Margel, President Mr. Donald Cook, Vice President Mr. Tim Clark, Legislative Representative Mr. Andy Song, Director Ms. Teresa Gregory, Director ADMINISTRATION Israel Vela Superintendent of Schools Dr. Wade Barringer, Deputy Superintendent Dave Bussard, Executive Director Operations Raul Parungao, Executive Director of Finance Gordon Cook, Director of Facilities Brett Scribner, Assistant Director Capital Projects Exhibit B AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table of Contents I - Executive Summary ................................................................................................. 1 II - Six - Year Enrollment Projection ............................................................................. 4 III - Current Kent School District “Standard of Service" ................................................. 7 Current Standards of Service for Elementary Students ................................................... 7 Current District Standards of Service for Secondary Students ........................................ 8 IV - Inventory and Capacity of Existing Schools ............................................................ 9 V - Six-Year Planning and Construction Plan .............................................................. 14 VI - Portable Classrooms ........................................................................................... 21 VII - Projected Six-Year Classroom Capacity ............................................................... 25 VIII - Finance Plan ..................................................................................................... 30 IX - Summary of Changes to June 2024 Capital Facilities Plan ..................................... 34 X - Appendices .......................................................................................................... 35 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) I - Executive Summary This Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan has been prepared by the Kent School District as the organization's capital facilities planning document, in compliance with the requirements of Washington's Growth Management Act, King County Code K.C.C. 21A.43 and Cities of Kent, Covington, Renton, Auburn, Black Diamond, Maple Valley, and SeaTac. This annual Plan update was prepared using data available in the spring of 2025 for the 2024-2025 school year. This annual update of the Plan reflects no new major capital projects. This Plan is consistent with prior long-term capital facilities plans adopted by the Kent School District. This Plan is not intended to be the sole planning document for all the District's needs. The District may prepare interim and periodic Long-Range Capital Facilities Plans consistent with Board Policies, considering a longer or shorter period, other factors and trends in the use of facilities, and other needs of the District as may be required. Prior Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent School District have been adopted by Metropolitan King County Council and Cities of Kent, Covington, Auburn, and Renton and included in the Capital Facilities Plan element of the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction. This Plan has also been submitted to the cities of Black Diamond, Maple Valley, and SeaTac for their information and inclusion in their Comprehensive Plans. In order for impact fees to be collected in the unincorporated areas of Kent School District, the Metropolitan King County Council must adopt this Plan and a fee- implementing ordinance for the District. For impact fees to be collected in the incorporated portions of the District, the cities of Kent, Covington, Renton and Auburn must also adopt this Plan and their own school impact fee ordinances. This Capital Facilities Plan establishes a standard of service in order to ascertain current and future capacity. While the State Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, those guidelines do not account for local program needs in the District. The Growth Management Act, King County and City codes and ordinances authorize the District to make adjustments to the standard of service based on specific needs for students of the District. This Plan includes the standard of service as established by Kent School District. Functional capacity is based on an average capacity and updated to reflect changes to special programs served in each building. Portables in the interim capacity calculation use the same standard of service as the permanent facilities. 1 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) The capacity of each school in the District is calculated based on the District’s standard of service and the existing inventory of permanent facilities. The District's program capacity of permanent facilities reflects program changes and the state’s mandated reduction of class size to meet the standard of service for Kent School District. Portables provide additional interim capacity. Kent School District is the fifth largest (FTE basis) district in the state. Enrollment is electronically reported monthly to the Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction (“OSPI”) on Form P-223. Although funding apportionment is based on Annual Average Full Time Equivalent (AAFTE), enrollment on October 1 is a widely recognized “snapshot in time” that is used to report the District’s enrollment for the year as reported to OSPI (See Table 1). The District's standard of service, enrollment history and projections, and use of interim facilities are reviewed in detail in various sections of this Plan. The District plans to continue to satisfy concurrency requirements through the interim use of portables. This Plan currently represents projects in progress funded primarily by the Kent School District’s 2016 Bond, the 2018 Capital Levy, and our newly passed 2024 Capital and Tech Levy. Additional information about these projects can be found on the District’s capital projects homepage (link). Additionally, project updates sent to our community of stakeholders can be accessed on the KSD website (link). Based on revised student generation rates, our capacity and enrollment projections, the District will stay current with non-collection of student impact fee rate for the coming year. For a short overview, see Section IX (Summary of Changes to the June 2025 Capital Facilities Plan). 2 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Description/Year 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 King County Live Births 24,630 25,032 24,910 25,348 25,487 26,011 25,274 24,337 24,090 23,638 Increase/(Decrease)402 (122)438 139 524 (737)(937)(247)(452) Kindergarten/Birth (%)8.3%8.0%8.2%7.8%7.9%6.5%7.3%7.7%7.3%7.7% Source: https://doh.wa.gov/data-and-statistical-reports/washington-tracking-network-wtn/county-all-births-dashboard Grade/Fiscal Year 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 K 2,045 2,013 2,037 1,989 2,010 1,703 1,836 1,874 1,761 1,811 1 2,131 2,067 2,056 2,061 2,036 1,882 1,768 1,945 1,931 1,793 2 2,163 2,163 2,077 2,008 2,091 1,980 1,818 1,840 1,965 1,958 3 2,176 2,195 2,143 2,043 1,995 2,001 1,938 1,887 1,878 1,970 4 2,089 2,195 2,218 2,118 2,038 1,912 1,924 1,953 1,924 1,945 5 1,958 2,103 2,189 2,170 2,120 1,937 1,872 1,953 1,973 1,924 6 2,058 1,952 2,119 2,184 2,164 2,024 1,893 1,962 1,948 1,928 7 1,974 2,021 1,922 2,044 2,166 2,010 1,925 1,906 1,949 1,951 8 2,100 2,021 2,043 1,882 2,073 2,086 1,937 1,956 1,922 1,936 9 2,093 2,105 2,006 2,003 1,888 2,001 2,042 2,010 1,955 1,922 10 2,165 2,099 2,080 1,946 2,034 1,811 1,959 2,048 2,000 1,947 11 1,818 1,865 1,823 1,732 1,663 1,743 1,584 1,679 1,729 1,782 12 1,742 1,730 1,810 1,653 1,634 1,453 1,655 1,467 1,500 1,565 Total Enrollment 26,512 26,529 26,523 25,833 25,912 24,543 24,151 24,480 24,435 24,432 Yearly Increase/ (Decrease)(211)17 (6)(690)79 (1,369)(392)329 (45)(3) Cumulative Increase/ (Decrease)(211)(194)(200)(890)(811)(2,180)(2,572)(2,243)(2,288)(2,291) Source: https://ospi.k12.wa.us/policy-funding/school-apportionment/safs-report (1251H Headcount.pdf) King County Live Births Enrollment KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 ENROLLMENT HISTORY 26,512 26,529 26,523 25,833 25,912 24,543 24,151 24,480 24,435 24,432 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 Enrollment TABLE 1 3 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) II - Six - Year Enrollment Projection For capital facilities planning, enrollment projections are based on cohort survival and student yield from documented residential construction projected over the next six years (See Table 2). For this Plan, the District used data from OSPI Information and Condition of Schools (ICOS), Report 1049. King County live births and the District's relational percentage average were used to determine the number of kindergartners entering the system (See Table 2). 7.5% of 23,390 King County live births in 2021 is projected for 1,755 students expected in Kindergarten for October 1, 2025. This is a decrease of 248 live births in King County over the previous year. The District’s enrollment from 2025-26 to 2030-31 is projected to decrease by an average of 1.5% each year or a total of 2,089 students. The projected enrollment for 2030-31 is 22,343. Early Childhood Education students (also identified as “ECE”), “Early Childhood Special Education (“ECSE”) students are forecasted and reported to OSPI separately on Form P-223H for Special Education Enrollment. Capacity is reserved to serve students in the ECE programs at elementary schools. Within practical limits, the District has kept abreast of proposed developments. The District will continue to track new development activity to determine impact on schools. Information on new residential developments and the completion of these proposed developments in all jurisdictions will be considered in the District's future analysis of growth projections. The Kent School District serves eight permitting jurisdictions: unincorporated King County, the cities of Kent, Covington, Renton, and Auburn and smaller portions of the cities of SeaTac, Black Diamond, and Maple Valley. 4 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) STUDENT GENERATION FACTOR "Student Generation Factor" is defined by King County code as "the number derived by a school district to describe how many students of each grade span are expected to be generated by a dwelling unit" based on district records of average actual student generated rates for developments completed within the last ten years. Following these guidelines, the student generation rate for Kent School District is as follows: Single Family Elementary 0.222 Middle 0.092 High 0.116 Total 0.430 Multi-Family Elementary 0.075 Middle 0.030 High 0.032 Total 0.137 The student generation factor is based on 1,927 new SFD (Single Family Detached) units built between 2018 and 2023. The student generation factor is based on 1,908 new MF (Multi- Family) units built during the same period. The multi-family units consisted of 1,590 apartment units and 318 townhome units. The District sees an average of 43 students for every 100 single family units that are built and an average of 14 students for every 100 multi-family units that are built. The rate for apartment units is higher than for townhome units. The rate for apartments can vary, depending on the affordability of the units and the number of bedrooms per unit for specific buildings. Many of the apartment units built between 2018 and 2023 have market rate rents and they tend to have fewer bedrooms per unit than some of the buildings that were completed in 2016 and 2017. The multi-family rate is lower this year than it was in March 2024 because the date range used in the analysis includes fewer affordable units and fewer multiple bedroom units. In preparing the 2024-2025 to 2030-2031 Capital Facilities Plan the District contracted with Educational Data Solutions, LLC led by Dr. Les Kendrick, a noted expert in demographic studies for school districts, to analyze and prepare the student generation factor. 5 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Description/Year 2021 2022 2023 2024 (Proj) 2025 (Proj) 2026 (Proj) King County Live Births 23,390 23,012 22,408 22,236 22,065 21,896 Increase/(Decrease)(248)(378)(604)(172)(171)(169) Kindergarten/Birth (%)7.5%7.5%7.6%7.6%7.5%7.5% Grade/Fiscal Year 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31 K 1,755 1,732 1,710 1,687 1,665 1,643 1 1,841 1,784 1,760 1,738 1,714 1,692 2 1,794 1,842 1,785 1,761 1,739 1,715 3 1,956 1,793 1,841 1,784 1,760 1,738 4 1,963 1,949 1,787 1,834 1,778 1,754 5 1,928 1,946 1,932 1,771 1,818 1,762 6 1,906 1,910 1,928 1,914 1,755 1,801 7 1,882 1,861 1,865 1,882 1,868 1,713 8 1,929 1,861 1,840 1,844 1,861 1,847 9 1,930 1,924 1,856 1,835 1,839 1,856 10 1,895 1,902 1,896 1,829 1,808 1,812 11 1,684 1,639 1,645 1,639 1,582 1,563 12 1,631 1,540 1,499 1,504 1,499 1,447 Total Enrollment 24,094 23,683 23,344 23,022 22,686 22,343 Yearly Increase/ (Decrease)(338)(411)(339)(322)(336)(343) Cumulative Increase/ (Decrease)(338)(749)(1,088)(1,410)(1,746)(2,089) Source: School Facilities Organization, Information and Condition of Schools (Report 1049) KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 ENROLLMENT PROJECTION King County Live Births Enrollment Projection Source: https://doh.wa.gov/data-and-statistical-reports/washington-tracking-network-wtn/county-all-births- dashboard TABLE 2 6 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) III - Current Kent School District “Standard of Service" In order to determine the capacity of facilities in a school district, King County Code 21A.06.1225 references a "standard of service" that each school district must establish to ascertain its overall capacity. The standard of service identifies the program year, the class size, the number of classrooms, students and programs of special need, and other factors determined by the district which would best serve the student population. This Plan includes the standard of service as established by Kent School District. The District has identified schools with significant special needs programs as “impact” schools and the standard of service targets a lower-class size at those facilities. Portables included in the capacity calculation use the same standard of service as the permanent facilities. The standard of service defined herein will continue to evolve in the future. Kent School District is continuing a long-term strategic planning process combined with review of changes to capacity and standard of service. This process will affect various aspects of the District's standard of service and future changes will be reflected in future capital facilities plans. Current Standards of Service for Elementary Students •Class size ratio for grades K - 3 is planned for an average of 24 students per class, not to exceed 26. •Class size ratio for grades 4 - 5 is planned for an average of 27 students per class, not to exceed 29. Some special programs require specialized classroom space and the program capacity of some of the buildings housing these programs is reduced. Some students, for example, leave their regular classroom for a short period of time to receive instruction in special programs and space must be allocated to serve these programs. Students may also be provided with music instruction and physical education in a separate classroom or facility. Some identified students will also be provided educational opportunities in classrooms for special programs such as those designated as follows: Career and Technical Education (CTE) – State Program Closing Educational Achievement Gaps (Title I – Part A) - Federal Program Highly Capable Students (HiCap) - State Program 7 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Learning Assistance Program (LAP) – State Program Multilingual Education (MLE) - State Program Inclusive Education Service for Elementary and Secondary students with disabilities may be provided in a separate or self-contained classroom sometimes with a capacity of 10-15 students, depending on the program. Current District Standards of Service for Secondary Students The standards of service outlined below reflect only those programs and educational opportunities provided to secondary students which directly affect the capacity of the school buildings per the negotiated collective bargaining agreement with KEA. •The average class size ratio for grades 6–8 is 28 students per class and 135 students per day, with a maximum daily class load/enrollment of 142 based on five class periods per day. •The average class size ratio for grades 9-12 is 32 students per class and 153 students per day, with a maximum daily class load/enrollment of 160 based on five class periods per day. Like Inclusive Education Programs listed above, many other secondary programs require specialized classroom space which can reduce the functional capacity of the permanent school buildings, such as technology labs, performing arts activities, a variety of career and technical education programs, and other specialized programs. Space or Classroom Utilization As a result of scheduling conflicts for student programs, the need for specialized rooms for certain programs, and the need for teachers to have a workspace during their planning periods, it is not possible to achieve 100% utilization of regular teaching stations at secondary schools. Based on the analysis of actual utilization of classrooms, the Kent School District has determined that the standard utilization rate is 64% for secondary schools. Functional capacity at elementary schools reflects 56% utilization at the elementary level. 8 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) IV - Inventory and Capacity of Existing Schools Currently, the District has a total functional capacity to house 39,705 students, which consists of a permanent functional capacity of 35,494 and interim (portable) capacity of 4,211. This capacity is based on the District's Standard of Service as set forth in Section III. Included in this Plan is an inventory of the District's schools by type, address and current capacity (See Table 3). The ratio between permanent capacity and portable capacity is 89% - 11%. The functional capacity is periodically updated for changes in the programs, additional classrooms, and new schools. Functional capacity has been updated in this Plan to reflect program changes implemented in the fall of 2024. Calculations of Elementary, Middle School and High School capacities are set forth in Table 3. Maps of existing schools are included. For clarification, the following is a brief description of some of the non-traditional programs for students in Kent School District: iGrad - Kent School District has developed the Individualized Graduation and Degree Program or “iGrad”. iGrad is an Open Door (Drop-out Reengagement) School that offers a second plus chance to students aged 16-21 who have dropped out of high school or are at risk of not earning a high school diploma by age 21. iGrad is not included in this Capital Facilities Plan, because it is served as a leased space at the Kent Hill Plaza Shopping Center. Over the past three years, enrollment in the iGrad program has averaged over 340 students. Kent Virtual Academy - The Kent Virtual Academy is open to grades 6-12 and is currently serving 167 students. The virtual school offers a flexible learning experience designed to engage students when and where they work best. Each school day includes a combination of live (synchronous) virtual instruction and on-demand (asynchronous) learning opportunities outside of a traditional bell schedule. Students can attend live virtual lessons with their teachers and classmates, participate in live virtual class or small group discussions, check-in or meet with teachers, watch recorded video lessons, work independently on projects and lessons, participate in learning experiences outside the school setting for credit or to meet competencies. Virtual school students may also attend their boundary school for select classes and services. 9 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Year Opened Carriage Crest Elementary 1990 CC 18235 - 140th Avenue SE, Renton 98058 626 Cedar Valley Elementary 1971 CV 26500 Timberlane Way SE, Covington 98042 541 Covington Elementary 2018 CO 25811 156th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 744 Crestwood Elementary 1980 CW 25225 - 180th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 602 1953 EH 9825 S 240th Street, Kent 98031 779 1999 EP 11800 SE 216th Street, Kent 98031 653 1969 FW 16600 - 148th Avenue SE, Renton 98058 528 East Hill Elementary Emerald Park Elementary Fairwood Elementary George T. Daniel Elementary 1992 DE 11310 SE 248th Street, Kent 98030 640 Glenridge Elementary 1996 GR 19405 - 120th Avenue SE, Renton 98058 591 Grass Lake Elementary 1971 GL 28700 - 191st Place SE, Kent 98042 595 Horizon Elementary 1990 HE 27641 - 144th Avenue SE, Kent 98042 634 Jenkins Creek Elementary 1987 JC 26915 - 186th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 641 Kent Elementary 1999 KE 24700 - 64th Avenue South, Kent 98032 760 Lake Youngs Elementary 1965 LY 19660 - 142nd Avenue SE, Kent 98042 725 Martin Sortun Elementary 1987 MS 12711 SE 248th Street, Kent 98030 768 Meadow Ridge Elementary 1994 MR 27710 - 108th Avenue SE, Kent 98030 706 Meridian Elementary 1939 ME 25621 - 140th Avenue SE, Kent 98042 793 Millennium Elementary 2000 ML 11919 SE 270th Street, Kent 98030 688 Neely-O'Brien Elementary 1990 NO 6300 South 236th Street, Kent 98032 864 Panther Lake Elementary 2009 PL 12022 SE 216th Street, Kent, 98031 744 1963 PO 11010 SE 232nd Street, Kent 98031 728 1967 PT 27825 - 118th Avenue SE, Kent 98030 732 1987 RW 18030 - 162nd Place SE, Renton 98058 661 2021 RR 22420 Military Rd. S., SeaTac, WA 98198 886 Park Orchard Elementary Pine Tree Elementary Ridgewood Elementary River Ridge Elementary Sawyer Woods Elementary 1994 SW 31135 - 228th Ave SE, Black Diamond 98010 549 1960 SH 837 1971 SC 591 1969 SB 730 1992 SR 719 20,055 1966 CR 1,110 1993 CH 1,140 1981 MA 1,020 1970 MK 1,230 1958 MM 1,110 2005 MC 1,200 Scenic Hill Elementary Soos Creek Elementary Springbrook Elementary Sunrise Elementary Elementary TOTAL 1996 NW 1,140 7,950 1951 KM 2,595 1997 KL 2,714 1968 KR 2,932 1981 KW 2,917 11,158 2021 KLA 542 Canyon Ridge Middle Cedar Heights Middle Mattson Middle Meeker Middle Meridian Middle Mill Creek Middle Northwood Middle Middle TOTAL Kent-Meridian High Kentlake High Kentridge High Kentwood High High TOTAL Kent Laboratory Academy DISTRICT TOTAL 39,705 2024-2025 Functional SCHOOL ABR ADDRESS 26025 Woodland Way South, Kent 98030 12651 SE 218th Place, Kent 98031 20035 - 100th Avenue SE, Kent 98031 22300 - 132nd Avenue SE, Kent 98042 11000 SE 264th Street, Kent 98030 19640 SE 272nd Street, Covington 98042 16400 SE 251st Street, Covington 98042 12600 SE 192nd Street, Renton 98058 23480 - 120th Avenue SE, Kent 98031 620 North Central Avenue, Kent 98032 17007 SE 184th Street, Renton 98058 10020 SE 256th Street, Kent 98030 21401 SE 300th Street, Kent 98042 12430 SE 208th Street, Kent 98031 25800 - 164th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 105 SE 208th St., Kent, WA 98031 Table 3 10 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Kent-Meridian High School Kentlake High School Kentridge High School Kentwood High School King County, WA State Parks GIS, Esri, HERE, Garmin, SafeGraph, METI/NASA, USGS, Bureau of Land Management, EPA, NPS, USDA Kent School District 2024/2025 School Year High School Boundaries Legend High School Buildings Kent-Meridian High School Kentlake High School Kentridge High School Kentwood High School ± 0 4 82 Miles 11 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Cedar Heights Mattson Meeker MeridianMill Creek Northwood Canyon Ridge King County, WA State Parks GIS, Esri, HERE, Garmin, SafeGraph, METI/NASA, USGS, Bureau of Land Management, EPA, NPS, USDA Middle Schools Cedar Heights Middle School Canyon Ridge Middle School Mattson Middle School Meeker Middle School Meridian Middle School Mill Creek Middle School Northwood Middle School Kent School District 2024/2025 School Year Middle School Boundaries 0 3.75 7.51.88 Miles Ü 12 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Carriage Crest Cedar ValleyCovington Crestwood East Hill Emerald Park Fairwood George T. Daniel Glenridge Grass Lake Horizon Jenkins Creek Kent Lake Youngs Martin Sortun Meadow Ridge Meridian Millennium Neely O Brien Panther Lake Park Orchard Pine Tree Ridgewood Sawyer Woods Scenic Hill Soos Creek Springbrook Sunrise River Ridge King County, WA State Parks GIS, Esri, HERE, Garmin, SafeGraph, METI/NASA, USGS, Bureau of Land Management, EPA, NPS, USDA Carriage Crest Elementary Cedar Valley Elementary Covington Elementary Crestwood Elementary Daniel Elementary East Hill Elementary Emerald Park Elementary Fairwood Elementary Glenridge Elementary Grass Lake Elementary Horizon Elementary Jenkins Creek Elementary Kent Elementary Lake Youngs Elementary Martin Sortun Elementary Meadow Ridge Elementary Meridian Elementary Millennium Elementary Neely O Brien Elementary Panther Lake Elementary Park Orchard Elementary Pine Tree Elementary Ridgewood Elementary River Ridge Elementary Sawyer Woods Elementary Scenic Hill Elementary Soos Creek Elementary Springbrook Elementary Sunrise Elementary Elementary Schools Kent School District 2024/2025 School Year Elementary School Boundaries 0 3.75 7.51.88 Miles Ü 13 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) V - Six-Year Planning and Construction Plan In November 2016, the voters of the Kent School District approved a bond measure for $252 million. This bonding authority provided for the replacement of Covington Elementary school, which opened in August of 2018, the new River Ridge Elementary school, and our new Kent Laboratory Academy, which both opened in August 2021. As a critical component of capital facilities planning, county and city planners and decision- makers are encouraged to consider safe walking conditions for all students when reviewing applications and design plans for new roads and developments. This should include sidewalks for pedestrian safety to and from schools and bus stops, as well as bus pull-outs and turn- arounds. Included in this Plan is an inventory of potential projects and sites identified by the District which are potentially acceptable site alternatives in the future (See Table 4 & Sitemap). Voter approved bond issues have included funding for the purchase of sites for future schools and district use; the sites acquired to date are included in this Plan. Some funding is secured for the purchase of additional sites but may also be funded with impact fees as needed. Not all undeveloped properties meet current school construction requirements, and some property may be traded or sold to meet future facility needs. The Board will continue an annual review of standards of service and those decisions will be reflected in each update of the Capital Facilities Plan. The Kent School District continues to make improvements to the facilities through completion of the 2016 Bond, 2018 Levy, and the recent voter approved 2024 Levy. At this moment the standing of the current measures are as follows: Measure Complete In Progress Not Started 2016 Bond 85% 13% 2% 2018 Levy 72% 13% 15% 2024 Levy 0% 14% 86% The Kent School District anticipates and is planning to run a Bond in 2028 for additional emergent needs, differed maintenance, tenant improvement projects, and possible facility replacement. As a part of the planning process, the District has been tracking a few major development projects which have affected enrollment and will continue to increase students' forecasts. On Meeker Street in Kent, we have seen several major apartment complexes, ETHOS and Midtown 64 Apartments. These continue to have an impact on enrollment as they fill up their newly built facilities. The Alexian Gateway Project is located on the corner of Military Road 14 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) and Veterans Drive in Kent and began occupying its 283 units in 2023-2024. In Covington, we are tracking a multi-family house development which has been approved and construction has begun. The 1700-unit Lakepointe Urban Community will fall within our enrollment boundary and proposed completion of Phase 4 is shown to be 2027. Construction in the Kent School District boundaries have been steadily rising over the last five years and planned communities are now being recognized through the planning teams in multiple city and county jurisdictions we serve. 15 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 Site Acquisitions and Projects Planned to Provide Additional Capacity Projected Projected % for SCHOOL / FACILITY / SITE LOCATION Type Status Completion Program new Date Capacity Growth Approximate Approximate # on Map ELEMENTARY MIDDLE & HIGH TEMPORARY FACILITIES Additional Capacity # on Map 2 OTHER SITES ACQUIRED Land Use Designation Type 16 White House - Kent 11027 SE Kent-Kangley Kent, WA 98030 Commercial Purchased 16a Green Building - Kent 11109 SE Kent-Kangley Kent, WA 98030 Commercial Purchased Notes: None King County Land Use Jurisdiction King County Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 4 May 2022 16 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) © copyright KROLL MAP COMPANY, INC. This map has been modified by KSD 05/22 Sawyer Woods Elementary Jenkins Creek Elementary Fairwood Elementary Ridgewood Elementary Northwood Middle School Lake Youngs Elementary Glenridge Elementary Kentridge High School Springbrook Elementary Soos Creek Elementary Sunrise Elementary Meridian Middle School Kentwood High School Park Orchard Elementary Martin Sortun Elementary Daniel Elementary East Hill Elementary Mill Creek Middle School Kent Elementary Kent-Meridian High School Scenic Hill Elementary Kent School District Administration Center Meadow Ridge Elementary Pine Tree Elementary Horizon Elementary Covington Elementary Cedar Heights Middle School Cedar Valley Elementary Crestwood Elementary Mattson Middle School Kentlake High School Neely O’Brien Elementary Carriage Crest Elementary MeridianElementary Meeker Middle School Grass Lake Elementary Emerald Park Elementary Millennium Elementary iGrad Kent Valley Early Learning Center The Outreach Program (TOP) Panther Lake Elementary River Ridge Elementary Kent Laboratory Academy 17 AG E N D A I T E M # 2 . d ) cccc cc ccc cc c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c V E T E R A N S D R I V E O L D M I L I T A R Y R O A D S O U T H AMENITY SPACE TRASH ENCLOSURES TRASH ENCLOSURES TRASH ENCLOSURES TRASH ENCLOSURES TRASH ENCLOSURES 2 1 0 1 2 2 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 4 0 1 2 1 0 4 2 2 0 4 2 3 0 4 2 4 0 4 2 1 0 5 2 2 0 5 2 3 0 5 2 4 0 5 2 1 0 8 2 2 0 8 2 3 0 8 2 4 0 8 2 1 0 9 2 2 0 9 2 3 0 9 2 4 0 9 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 2 3 1 2 2 4 1 2 2 1 1 3 2 2 1 3 2 3 1 3 2 4 1 3 2 1 1 6 2 2 1 6 2 3 1 6 2 4 1 6 2 1 0 2 2 2 0 2 2 3 0 2 2 4 0 2 2 1 0 3 2 2 0 3 2 3 0 3 2 4 0 3 ------ 2 2 0 6 2 3 0 6 2 4 0 6 ------ 2 2 0 7 2 3 0 7 2 4 0 7 ------ 2 2 1 0 2 3 1 0 2 4 1 0 ------ 2 2 1 1 2 3 1 1 2 4 1 1 ------ 2 2 1 4 2 3 1 4 2 4 1 4 ------ 2 2 1 5 2 3 1 5 2 4 1 5 MAINTENANCE SHED M001 1. UNIT NUMBERS READ TOP TO BOTTOM (FLOOR 1-4) AS INDICATED ON THE UNIT STACK ONE BEDROOM UNITS TWO BEDROOM UNITS THREE BEDROOM UNITS LEGEND 3102 3202 3302 3402 3101 3201 3301 3401 3103 3203 3303 3403 3104 3204 3304 3404 3106 3206 3306 3406 3105 3205 3305 3405 3107 3207 3307 3407 3108 3208 3308 3408 3110 3210 3310 3410 3109 3209 3309 3409 3112 3212 3312 3412 3114 3214 3314 3414 3111 3211 3311 3411 3101 3201 3301 3401 TYPE A UNITS 3115 3215 3315 3415 3116 3216 3316 3416 ------ 3217 3317 3417 3118 3218 3318 3418 3119 3219 3319 3419 ------ 3220 3320 3420 ------ 3221 3321 3421 3122 3222 3322 3422 3123 3223 3323 3423 ------ 3224 3324 3424 1 1 0 5 1 2 0 5 1 3 0 5 1 4 0 5 NO UNIT - GARAGE ONLY----- * * * * * * *BUILDING SIGNAGE ------ 1 2 0 4 1 3 0 4 1 4 0 4 ------ 1 2 0 1 1 3 0 1 ------ ------ ------ 1 3 0 2 ------ ------ 1 2 0 3 1 3 0 3 1 4 0 3 1 1 0 6 1 2 0 6 1 3 0 6 1 4 0 6 1 1 0 7 1 2 0 7 1 3 0 7 1 4 0 7 1 1 1 0 1 2 1 0 1 3 1 0 1 4 1 0 1 1 0 8 1 2 0 8 1 3 0 8 1 4 0 8 1 1 0 9 1 2 0 9 1 3 0 9 1 4 0 9 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 3 1 2 1 4 1 2 1 1 1 5 1 2 1 5 1 3 1 5 1 4 1 5 1 1 1 6 1 2 1 6 1 3 1 6 1 4 1 6 1 1 1 7 1 2 1 7 1 3 1 7 1 4 1 7 ------ 1 2 1 8 1 3 1 8 1 4 1 8 ------ 1 2 1 5 1 3 1 5 1 4 1 5 ------ 1 2 1 4 1 3 1 4 1 4 1 4 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 4 1 1 1 1 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 3 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 3 2 1 1 4 2 1 1 1 2 4 1 2 2 4 1 3 2 4 1 4 2 4 1 1 2 5 1 2 2 5 1 3 2 5 1 4 2 5 1 1 2 8 1 2 2 8 1 3 2 8 1 4 2 8 1 1 2 9 1 2 2 9 1 3 2 9 1 4 2 9 1 1 3 2 1 2 3 2 1 3 3 2 1 4 3 2 1 1 3 3 1 2 3 3 1 3 3 3 1 4 3 3 1 1 3 6 1 2 3 6 1 3 3 6 1 4 3 6 1 1 3 7 1 2 3 7 1 3 3 7 1 4 3 7 ------ 1 2 1 9 1 3 1 9 1 4 1 9 ------ 1 2 2 2 1 3 2 2 1 4 2 2 ------ 1 2 2 3 1 3 2 3 1 4 2 3 ------ 1 2 2 6 1 3 2 6 1 4 2 6 ------ 1 2 2 7 1 3 2 7 1 4 2 7 ------ 1 2 3 0 1 3 3 0 1 4 3 0 ------ 1 2 3 1 1 3 3 1 1 4 3 1 ------ 1 2 3 4 1 3 3 4 1 4 3 4 ------ 1 2 3 5 1 3 3 5 1 4 3 5 1 1 3 8 1 2 3 8 1 3 3 8 1 4 3 8 APARTMENT PROJECTS WITH MULTIPLE BUILDINGS SHALL HAVE MONUMENT SIGNS ------- SHOWING THE STREET ADDRESSES OF EACH BUILDING AT EACH VEHICLE ENTRANCE TO THE SITE. EACH ETHICAL ENTRANCE SHALL ALSO HAVE AN ILLUMINATED SITE PLAN AND / OR DIRECTLY SIGNS. THE SIGNS SHALL SHOW THE LOCATION OF THE SIGN (THE VIEWER'S CURRENT LOCATION) AND ALL BUILDING ADDRESSES. DWELLING NUMBERS SHALL BE INCLUDED. THE MONUMENT SIGNS SHALL HAVE A CONTRASTING BACKGROUND COLOR. ALL SITE SIGNAGE TO BE PER OWNERS SPECIFICATION AND DESIGN AND UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT. * INDICATE APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF ILLUMINATED BUILDING ADDRESS SIGNAGE. SIGNAGE FOR BUILDINGS MUST INCLUDE THE ENTIRE BUILDING ADDRESS AND STREET NAME. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE NO LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT. THE BUILDING SIGN SHALL HAVE A CONTRASTING BACKGROUND COLOR. 542 1st AVE. SOUTH, FLOOR 4 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104 © 2019 KATERRA ARCHITECTURE LLC © 2019 KATERRA ARCHITECTURE II LLC © 2019 KATERRA ARCHITECTURE III PLLC © 2019 KATERRA ARCHITECTURE IV LLC ALL DRAWINGS, SPECIFICATIONS, PLANS, IDEAS, ARRANGEMENTS AND DESIGNS REPRESENTED OR REFERRED TO ARE THE PROPERTY OF AND ARE OWNED BY KATERRA INC. WHETHER THE PROJECT FOR WHICH THEY ARE MADE IS EXECUTED OR NOT. THEY WERE CREATED, EVOLVED, DEVELOPED AND PRODUCED FOR THE SOLE USE ON AND IN CONNECTION WITH THIS PROJECT AND NONE OF THE ABOVE MAY BE DISCLOSED OR GIVEN TO OR USED BY ANY PERSON, FIRM OR CORPORATION FOR ANY USE OR PURPOSE WHATSOEVER INCLUDING ANY OTHER PROJECT, EXCEPT UPON WRITTEN PERMISSION AND DIRECTION OF KATERRA INC. Owner Consultant BLDG. 1 BLDG. 2 BLDG. 3 Key plan Revisions Mark Date Description N 10/30/2020 UNIT NUMBERING/ ADDRESSING SHEET(1,2,3) G.00.014 ALEXAN GATEWAY APARTMENTS 23000 MILITARY RD S, KENT, WA 98032 RM RM 075-18001 12/13/19 IFC SET Drawn By Project Manager Job Number Date Of Original Professional Seal SCALE: 3/64" = 1'-0"1 UNIT NUMBERING PLAN NORTH 0 06/12/2019 PERMIT SET 2 01/09/2020 REV.3 ITCD UPDATES 6 05/22/2020 PC1 CORRECTIONS ''18 AG E N D A I T E M # 2 . d ) Phase 1B Phase 2 Phase 3 SE 260th St 18 9 t h A v e S E 1 8 8 t h A v e S E 19 1 s t P l S E SE 259th Pl 19 3 r d P l S E 19 6 t h A v e S E SE 2 5 9 t h S t SE 2 6 0 t h S t 19 9 t h A v e S E S E T i m b e r l a n e B l v d 198th Pl SE SE 2 5 6 t h S t SR 1 8 20 4 t h A v e S E 201s t A v e S E S E 2 5 8 t h S t 20 3 r d A v e S E S E 2 5 8 t h P l Phase 4 Phase 1A Phasing Legend Phasing MapLakepointe Urban Village Phasing MapLakepointe Urban Village 200 400 400' 0 100 SCALE: 1" = N NOTE: THE LOCATION OF DEVELOPMENT, INCLUDINGS ROADWAYS AND TRAILS, IS APPROXIMATE AND DOES NOT VEST TO THIER SPECIFIC LOCATION. THE LOCATION OF ALL DEVELOPMENT WILL BE BASED ON EXISTING CONDITIONS AT THE TIME OF APPLICATION AND THE TERMS OF THE PLANNED ACTION, THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, AND APPLICABLE LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL LAWS. January 30, 2017 Phase 1B - Approximate Years 2019-2024 Phase 2 - Approximate Years 2020-2025 Phase 3 - Approximate Years 2023-2028 Establishment of final grade, construction of Covington Connector to Southeast boundary, construction of first phase of commercial development. Establishment of final lake perimeter, construction of 191st Place SE extension and associated R-12 residential development, construction of second phase of commercial development on peninsula. Construction of third phase of commercial development. Preliminary Plat approval in third quarter 2021. Construction and Final Plat Recording 2022. Phase 1A - Maple Hills Division 5 Phase 4 - Approximate Years 2020-2027 Completion of gravel pit reclamation, construction of MR and R-12 residential development Updated September 15, 2021 11 9 10 8 8 19 AG E N D A I T E M # 2 . d ) 1 9 1 s t P l S E Jenkins Creek SE 260th St 18 9 t h A v e S E 1 8 8 t h A v e S E 19 1 s t P l S E SE 259th Pl 193 r d P l S E 19 6 t h A v e S E SE 2 5 9 t h S t SE 2 6 0 t h S t 19 9 t h A v e S E S E T i m b e r l a n e B l v d 198th Pl SE SE 2 5 6 t h S t SR 1 8 20 4 t h A v e S E 201s t A v e S E S E 2 5 8 t h S t 20 3 r d A v e S E S E 2 5 8 t h P l B RCMU PARKS 24,956 SF 0.57 AC RCMU PARKS 97,621 SF 2.24 AC MR PARKS 110,686 SF 2.54 AC R-12 PARKS 14,185 SF 0.33 AC R-12 PARKS 12,500 SF 0.29 AC MR PARKS 128,425 SF 2.95 AC R-12 PARKS 32,553 SF 0.75 AC R-6 PARKS 14,112 SF 0.32 AC R-12 PARKS 7,254 SF 0.17 AC R-6 OPEN SPACE 1,880,037 SF 43.16 AC R-12 OPEN SPACE 572,210 SF 13.14 AC R-12 OPEN SPACE 4,549 SF 0.10 AC R-12 OPEN SPACE 34,788 SF 0.80 AC RCMU OPEN SPACE 86,894 SF 1.99 AC R-6 PARKS 9,908 SF 0.23 AC MR PARKS 12,799 SF 0.29 AC MR OPEN SPACE 22,507 SF 0.52 AC R-12 OPEN SPACE 5,687 SF 0.13 AC R-6 OPEN SPACE 139,837 SF 3.21 AC R-6 OPEN SPACE 57,182 SF 1.31 AC P Covi n g t o n C o n n e c t o r Master Development PlanLakepointe Urban Village Master Development PlanLakepointe Urban Village January 30, 2017 Wetland Wetland Buffer Undisturbed Open Space Publicly Accessible Parks and Plazas Medium Density Residential (R-6) Central Pond Feature Covington Highlands Trail Trails / Offsite Trail Connections Stop Light Proposed Park and Ride Facility Transit Stop Proposed Truck and Bus Return Route Public Streets High Density Residential (R-12) Mixed Residential (MR) Mixed Use / Commercial (RCMU) Legend B Bike Route CENTRAL POND FEATURE Gateway Element Steep Slope and Buffer 200 400 400' 0 100 SCALE: 1" = N Proposed Trail Parking Focal Point / Public Gathering Spot Landscape Areas Jenkins Creek P Pedestrian / Wildlife Undercrossing NOTE: THE LOCATION OF DEVELOPMENT, INCLUDINGS ROADWAYS AND TRAILS, IS APPROXIMATE AND DOES NOT VEST TO THIER SPECIFIC LOCATION. THE LOCATION OF ALL DEVELOPMENT WILL BE BASED ON EXISTING CONDITIONS AT THE TIME OF APPLICATION AND THE TERMS OF THE PLANNED ACTION, THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, AND APPLICABLE LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL LAWS. Mix of Multi-Family and Commercial is Encouraged within Peninsula Area Updated September 15, 2021 Disturbed (Graded) Open Space SPECIAL PAVEMENT PARKS TABLE RCMU MR R-12 R-6 ZONE SQ FOOTAGE ACREAGE 122,577 SF 251,910 SF 66,492 SF 24,020 SF 2.81 AC 5.78 AC 1.53 AC 0.55 AC TOTAL 464,999 SF 10.67 AC POND TABLE RCMU MR R-12 R-6 ZONE SQ FOOTAGE ACREAGE 366,128 SF 106,040 SF 334,094 SF 0 SF 8.41 AC 2.43 AC 7.67 AC 0.00 AC TOTAL 806,262 SF 18.51 AC OPEN SPACE TABLE RCMU MR R-12 R-6 ZONE SQ FOOTAGE ACREAGE 86,984 SF 22,507 SF 617,234 SF 2,077,056 SF 1.99 AC 0.52 AC 14.17 AC 47.68 AC TOTAL 2,803,691 SF 64.36 AC COMBINED OPEN SPACE TABLE RCMU MR R-12 R-6 ZONE PARKS 2.81 AC 5.78 AC 1.53 AC 0.55 AC TOTAL 10.67 AC 91.25 AC 34.00 AC 35.34 AC 53.51 AC 214.10 AC OPEN SPACE* POND 8.41 AC 2.43 AC 7.67 AC 0.00 AC 18.51 AC *OPEN SPACE INCLUDES CRITICAL AREAS, BUFFERS, AND OTHER GREEN SPACES 13.21 AC 8.73 AC 23.37 AC 48.23 AC 93.55 AC NET ACRES** 78.03 AC 25.27 AC 11.98 AC 5.27 AC 120.55 AC 1.99 AC 0.52 AC 14.17 AC 47.68 AC 64.36 AC GROSS ACREAGE TOTAL AMENITIES WILDLIFE / PEDESTRIAN UNDER-CROSSING **NET ACRES EQUALS GROSS ACREAGE MINUS TOTAL AMENITIES FUTURE CONNECTION BEYOND PROPERTY BY OTHERS 3 6 4 6 1 2 5 7 20 AG E N D A I T E M # 2 . d ) VI - Portable Classrooms The Plan references use of portables as interim capacity for facilities. Currently, the District utilizes portables to house students in excess of functional capacity and for program purposes at some school locations (Please see Appendices A, B, C). Based on enrollment projections, implementation of full day kindergarten programs, lower state mandated class sizes, functional capacity, and no need for additional interim capacity, the District anticipates no need to purchase or lease additional portables during the next six- year period to ensure capacity requirement (Noted in section V. Six Yr. Planning Construction). During the time period covered by this Plan, the District does not anticipate that all of the District’s portables will be replaced by permanent facilities. During the useful life of some of the portables, the school-age population may decline in some communities and increase in others, and these portables provide the flexibility to accommodate the immediate needs of the community. Portables may be used as interim facilities: 1.To prevent overbuilding or overcrowding of permanent school facilities. 2.To cover the gap between the times of demand for increased capacity and completion of permanent school facilities to meet that demand. 3.To meet unique program requirements. Portables currently in the District’s inventory are continually evaluated and maintained. The District's goal is to reduce the number of portables so we may provide an equitable learning environment for all. The Plan projects that the District will use portables to accommodate interim housing needs for the next six years and beyond. The use of portables, their impacts on permanent facilities, life cycle and operational costs, and the interrelationship between portables, emerging technologies, and educational restructuring will continue to be examined. 21 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT FACTORS FOR ESTIMATED IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS Student Generation Factors - Single Family Student Generation Factors - Multi-Family Elementary (Grades K - 5)0.222 Elementary (Grades K - 5)0.075 Middle (Grades 6- 8)0.092 Middle (Grades 6- 8)0.030 Senior High (Grades 9 - 12)0.116 Senior High (Grades 9 - 12)0.032 Total 0.430 Total 0.137 Projected Increased Student Capacity OSPI - Square Footage per Student Elementary 0 Elementary 110 Middle 0 Middle 134 Senior High (Academy)0 Senior High 144 Special Education 153 Required Site Acreage per Facility Elementary (required)12 Average Site Cost / Acre Middle (required)25 Elementary $161,678 Senior High (required)40 Middle $0 Senior High $0 $68,000,000 Temporary Facility Capacity & Cost $155,000,000 Elementary @ 24 $315,000 $220,000,000 Middle @ 28 $315,000 Senior High @ 32 $315,000 State Funding Assistance Credit 123,702 District Funding Assistance Percentage 54.31% 10,256 21,296 155,254 Construction Cost Allocation CCA - Cost/Sq, Ft. $375.00 1,567,594 760,483 District Average Assessed Value 1,077,315 Single Family Residence $657,970 3,405,392 District Average Assessed Value 1,691,296 Multi-Family Residence $320,116 770,739 New Facility Construction Cost Elementary Middle Senior High Temporary Facility Square Footage Elementary Middle Senior High Total 4.4% Permanent Facility Square Footage Elementary Middle Senior High/Other Total 95.6% Total Facilities Square Footage Elementary Middle Senior High/Other 1,098,611 Total 3,560,646 Bond Levy Tax Rate/$1,000 $0.46 Current Rate / 1,000 Tax Rate 0.0005 Developer Provided Sites / Facilities Value 0 General Obligation Bond Interest Rate Dwelling Units 0 Current Bond Interest Rate 4.37% CPI Inflation Factor 5.80% Budget Preparations | OSPI (www.k12.wa.us) * Reflects current facility construction (APPENDIX A) 22 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT FACTORS FOR ESTIMATED IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS Site Acquisition Cost per Single Family Residence Formula: ((Acres x Cost per Acre) / Facility Capacity) x Student Generation Factor Required Site Acreage Average Site Cost/Acre Facility Capacity Student Factor A 1 (Elementary)12 $161,678 0 0.222 A 2 (Middle)25 $0 0 0.092 A 3 (Senior High)40 $0 0 0.116 Total 77 $161,678 0 0.430 A a $0.00 Permanent Facility Construction Cost per Single Family Residence Formula: ((Facility Cost / Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Permanent/Total Square Footage Ratio) Construction Cost Facility Capacity Student Factor Footage Ratio B 1 (Elementary)$68,000,000 0 0.222 0.903 B 2 (Middle)$155,000,000 0 0.092 0.984 B 3 (Senior High)$220,000,000 0 0.116 0.998 Total $443,000,000 0 0.430 B a $0.00 Temporary Facility Cost per Single Family Residence (Portables) Formula: ((Facility Cost / Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Temporary / Total Square Footage Ratio) Facility Cost Facility Capacity Student Factor Footage Ratio C 1 (Elementary)$315,000 24 0.222 0.097 $282.63 C 2 (Middle)$315,000 28 0.092 0.016 $15.99 C 3 (Senior High)$315,000 32 0.116 0.020 $23.57 Total $945,000 84 0.430 C a $322.20 State Funding Assistance Credit per Single Family Residence (formerly "State Match") Formula: Area Cost Allowance x SPI Square Feet per student x Funding Assistance % x Student Factor Construction Cost AllocationSPI Sq. Ft. / Student Assistance %Student Factor D 1 (Elementary)$375.00 110 0.5431 0.222 $4,973.44 D 2 (Middle)$375.00 134 0.5431 0.092 $2,510.75 D 3 (Senior High)$375.00 144 0.5431 0.116 $3,401.98 D a $10,886.17 Tax Credit per Single Family Residence Average SF Residential Assessed Value (AAV)$657,970 Net Present Value (per EQ) (NPV)8.32 Current Debt Service Rate / 1,000 ( r )0.05%TC a $2,534.98 (Below used to calculate NPV) Current Bond Interest Rate 4.37% Years Amortized (10 Years)- Used in NPV Calculation 10 Developer Provided Facility Credit Facility / Site Value Dwelling Units 0 0 FC a 0 Fee Recap ** A = Site Acquisition per SF Residence $0.00 B = Permanent Facility Cost per Residence $0.00 C = Temporary Facility Cost per Residence $322.20 Subtotal $322.20 D = State Match Credit per Residence $10,886.17 TC = Tax Credit per Residence $2,534.98 Subtotal $13,421.15 Total Unfunded Need ($13,098.95) 50% Developer Fee Obligation ($6,549) FC = Facility Credit (if applicable)$0 District Adjustment $6,549 Net Fee Obligation per Residence - Single Family $0.00 (APPENDIX B) 23 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT FACTORS FOR ESTIMATED IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS Site Acquisition Cost per Multi-Family Residence Unit Formula: ((Acres x Cost per Acre) / Facility Capacity) x Student Generation Factor Required Site Acreage Average Site Cost/Acre Facility Capacity Student Factor A 1 (Elementary)12 $161,678 0 0.075 A 2 (Middle)25 $0 0 0.030 A 3 (Senior High)40 $0 0 0.032 Total 77 $161,678 0 0.137 2 A $0.00 Permanent Facility Construction Cost per Multi-Family Residence Unit Formula: ((Facility Cost / Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Permanent / Total Square Footage Ratio) Construction Cost Facility Capacity Student Factor Footage Ratio B 1 (Elementary)$68,000,000 0 0.075 0.903 B 2 (Middle)$155,000,000 0 0.030 0.984 B 3 (Senior High)$220,000,000 0 0.032 0.998 Total $443,000,000 0 0.137 B $0.00 Temporary Facility Cost per Multi-Family Residence Unit Formula: ((Facility Cost / Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Temporary / Total Square Footage Ratio) Facility Cost Facility Capacity Student Factor Footage Ratio C 1 (Elementary)$315,000 24 0.075 0.097 $95.48 C 2 (Middle)$315,000 28 0.030 0.016 $5.21 C 3 (Senior High)$315,000 32 0.032 0.020 $6.50 Total $945,000 84 0.137 C $107.20 State Funding Assistance Credit per Multi-Family Residence (formerly "State Match") Formula: Area Cost Allowance x SPI Square Feet per student x Funding Assistance % x Student Factor Area Cost Allowance SPI Sq. Ft. / Student Equalization %Student Factor D 1 (Elementary)$375.00 110 0.5431 0.075 $1,680.22 D 2 (Middle)$375.00 134 0.5431 0.030 $818.72 D 3 (Senior High)$375.00 144 0.5431 0.032 $938.48 D $3,437.42 Tax Credit per Multi Family Residence Average MF Residential Assessed Value (AAV)$320,116 Net Present Value (per EQ) (NPV)8.32 Current Debt Service Rate / 1,000 ( r )0.05%TC $1,233.32 (Below used to calculate NPV) Current Bond Interest Rate 4.37% Years Amortized (10 Years)- Used in NPV Calcula 10 Developer Provided Facility Credit Facility / Site Value Dwelling Units 0 0 FC 0 Fee Recap ** A = Site Acquisition per Multi-Family Unit $0.00 B = Permanent Facility Cost per MF Unit $0.00 C = Temporary Facility Cost per MF Unit $107.20 Subtotal $107.20 D = State Match Credit per MF Unit $3,437.42 TC = Tax Credit per MF Unit $1,233.32 Subtotal $4,670.73 Total Unfunded Need ($4,563.53) 50% Developer Fee Obligation ($2,282) FC = Facility Credit (if applicable)0 District Adjustment $2,282 Net Fee Obligation per Residential Unit - Multi-family $0.00 (APPENDIX C) 24 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) VII - Projected Six-Year Classroom Capacity As stated in Section IV, the functional capacity study is periodically updated for changes in special programs and reflects class size requirements, class size fluctuations etc. As shown in the Inventory and Capacity chart in Table 3, the functional capacity is also reflected in the capacity and enrollment comparison charts (See Tables 5 & 5 a-b-c). Enrollment is electronically reported to OSPI on Form P-223 on a monthly basis and funding apportionment is based on Annual Average FTE (AAFTE). The first school day of October is widely recognized as the enrollment “snapshot in time” to report enrollment for the year. Kent School District continues to be the fifth largest district (both FTE and headcount basis) in the State of Washington. The P-223 Headcount for October 2024 was 24,432, excluding ECSE and college-only Running Start students. In October 2024, there were 1,159 students in 11th and 12th grade participating in the Running Start program at different colleges and receiving credits toward both high school and college graduation. Of these students, 629 attended classes only at the college (“college-only”) and are excluded from FTE and headcount for capacity and enrollment comparisons. Kent School District has one of the highest Running Start program participation rates in the State. Based on the enrollment forecasts, permanent facility inventory and capacity, current standard of service, portable capacity, and future additional classroom space, the District plans to continue to satisfy the required capacity through the interim use of portables (See Table 5 and Tables 5 a-b-c). While the District currently shows available capacity to address projected need on a purely statistical basis, there are a variety of extenuating factors that need to be considered. The Kent School District currently makes significant use of portables, which we do not consider as part of our permanent standard of service. We have included portable space in our interim capacity figures, and we do not count that as a permanent space solution. Kent School District is unusual in that it incorporates neighborhoods intersecting with 8 jurisdictions, including Kent, Covington, Auburn, Black Diamond, Maple Valley, Renton, unincorporated King County and SeaTac. The district covers 72 square miles and includes over 40 schools. Within this large geographic area, we expect to have pockets of localized capacity need that are not necessarily reflected in the aggregate figures. As one example, the Lakepointe Urban Village development in Covington may require new classroom capacity even as space may exist in schools on the far other end of the District’s boundaries. 25 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY TOTAL DISTRICT SCHOOL YEAR 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31 Actual Permanent Functional Capacity 1 35,494 35,494 35,494 35,494 35,494 35,494 35,494 Changes to Permanent Capacity 1 Capacity Increase (F) Additional Permanent Classrooms 0000000 Permanent Program Capacity Subtotal 35,494 35,494 35,494 35,494 35,494 35,494 35,494 Interim Portable Capacity Elementary Portable Capacity Required 3,228 3,228 3,228 3,228 3,228 3,228 3,228 Middle School Portable Capacity Required 375 375 375 375 375 375 375 High School Portable Capacity Required 608 608 608 608 608 608 608 Interim Portable Capacity Total 4,211 4,211 4,211 4,211 4,211 4,211 4,211 TOTAL CAPACITY 1 39,705 39,705 39,705 39,705 39,705 39,705 39,705 Total Enrollment/Projection 2 24,432 24,094 23,683 23,344 23,022 22,686 22,343 DISTRICT AVAILABLE CAPACITY 15,246 15,584 15,995 16,334 16,656 16,992 17,335 1 Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes. 2 Projection Source: School Facilities Organization, Information and Condition of Schools (Report 1049) P R O J E C T E D Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 May 2025 26 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY SCHOOL YEAR 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31 Actual Elementary Permanent Capacity 1 16,696 16,696 16,696 16,696 16,696 16,696 16,696 Additional Permanent Classrooms 2 0000000 Permanent Program Capacity Subtotal 16,696 16,696 16,696 16,696 16,696 16,696 16,696 Interim Portable Capacity 3,228 3,228 3,228 3,228 3,228 3,228 3,228 TOTAL CAPACITY 1 19,924 19,924 19,924 19,924 19,924 19,924 19,924 ENROLLMENT / PROJECTION 2 11,401 11,237 11,046 10,815 10,575 10,474 10,304 SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY 8,496 8,660 8,851 9,082 9,322 9,423 9,593 1 Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes. 2 Projection Source: School Facilities Organization, Information and Condition of Schools (Report 1049) ELEMENTARY: Grades K - 5 Elementary Grade K-5 P R O J E C T E D Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 A May 2025 27 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY SCHOOL YEAR 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31 Actual Middle School Permanent Capacity 1 7,216 7,216 7,216 7,216 7,216 7,216 7,216 Changes to Middle School Capacity 0000000 Permanent Program Capacity Subtotal 7,216 7,216 7,216 7,216 7,216 7,216 7,216 Portable Interim Capacity 1 375 375 375 375 375 375 375 TOTAL CAPACITY 1 7,591 7,591 7,591 7,591 7,591 7,591 7,591 ENROLLMENT / PROJECTION 2 5,815 5,717 5,632 5,633 5,640 5,484 5,361 SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY 1,776 1,874 1,959 1,958 1,951 2,107 2,230 1 Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes. MIDDLE SCHOOL: Grades 6 - 8 2 Projection Source: School Facilities Organization, Information and Condition of Schools (Report 1049) P R O J E C T E D Middle School Grade 6-8 Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 B May 2025 28 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY SCHOOL YEAR 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31 Actual Senior High Permanent Capacity 1 10,097 10,097 10,097 10,097 10,097 10,097 10,097 Changes to High School Capacity 0000000 Permanent Program Capacity Subtotal 10,097 10,097 10,097 10,097 10,097 10,097 10,097 Portables Interim Capacity 1 608 608 608 608 608 608 608 TOTAL CAPACITY 1 10,705 10,705 10,705 10,705 10,705 10,705 10,705 ENROLLMENT / PROJECTION 2 7,216 7,140 7,005 6,896 6,807 6,728 6,678 SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY 3,489 3,565 3,700 3,809 3,898 3,977 4,027 1 Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes. HIGH SCHOOL: Grades 9 - 12 P R O J E C T E D 2 Projection Source: School Facilities Organization, Information and Condition of Schools (Report 1049) Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 C May 2025 29 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) VIII - Finance Plan The finance plan shown on Table 6 demonstrates how the Kent School District plans to finance improvements for the years 2024-2025 through 2030-2031. The financing components include secured and unsecured funding and impact fees. The plan is based on future bond issues, state school construction assistance, collection of impact fees under the State Growth Management Act and voluntary mitigation fees paid pursuant to State Environmental Policy Act. In November 2016, the District held a special election to approve the authorization of $252,000,000 in bonding authority. The projects described below are part of this authorization. The first series of bonds ($80 million) were issued in February 2017, which funded the Covington Elementary Replacement School, as well as other infrastructure projects. Impact fees were used at both River Ridge Elementary School and Kent Laboratory Academy projects due to escalation in construction pricing across the Pacific Northwest. According to RCW 82.02.090, the definition of an impact fee is ". . . a payment of money imposed upon development as a condition of development approval to pay for public facilities needed to serve new growth and development, and that is reasonably related to the new development that creates additional demand and need for public facilities, that is a proportionate share of the cost of the public facilities, and that is used for facilities that reasonably benefit the new development. `Impact fee' does not include a reasonable permit or application fee." Mitigation or impact fees can be calculated on the basis of "unhoused student need" or "the maintenance of a district's level of service" as related to new residential development. A mitigation/impact fee may be imposed based upon a determination of insufficient existing permanent and/or interim portable school space or to pay for permanent and/or newly acquired interim portable school space previously constructed as a result of growth in the district. A district's School Board must first approve the application of the mitigation or impact fees and, in turn, approval must then be granted by the other general government jurisdictions having responsibility within the district, counties, cities and towns (Kent, Covington, Renton, Auburn, Black Diamond, Maple Valley, SeaTac, and Unincorporated King County). Though the current enrollment projections increase for both elementary and secondary schools are relatively flat, the ongoing need to provide permanent instructional facilities to house students is a driving need as the shifts in our family populations continue, due to ongoing development. Previously collected impact fees may be used to support and address the challenges related to the number of interim instructional facilities currently in use, the replacement of some of these aged facilities, the maintenance of the district's level of services, and the potential expansions to existing facilities in future years. The Kent School District 2024-2025 CFP update includes continued execution of the 2016 Capital Bond Projects, the 2018 Levy Projects, and the data collection and review of our Facility Assessment Reports. The District Facilities and Capital Planning Teams had come together and joined the Capital 30 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Bond Planning Task Force (CBPTF) which included District personnel, design professionals, teaching staff, student voices, as well as community members who collaborated and discussed the District’s needs. The initial plan revealed priorities including school replacement due to age, and the need for added permanent facilities to (1) reduce and eliminate our need for portables and (2) accommodate future growth as housing in the Kent region continues to expand. We started with a list of 2 billion in needs and through itemizing and prioritizing, we brought the list of essential projects to 495 million. This list was brought before the District’s Board of Directors for comments, discussion, and approval. A Capital Bond Measure followed and went out to vote in April 2023 and did not pass with voter approval. After the failure to pass the 2023 Bond, we re-evaluated needs as well as next steps. Surveys went out to the community to see what people would like to prioritize from the list of needed projects. A new list of projects was presented through the 2023 Levy in November. This levy did not pass. This list was again taken and revised to prioritize projects that are critical to operations and life safety within our buildings. In April we set forth our 2024 Levy to a vote, which also did not receive the needed support to pass. We once again reduced the Levy list to include only emergent needs to critical building operations, and the measure was approved by voters in November of 2024. Future updates to this Capital Facilities Plan will include details of any adopted planning. With the opening of Canyon Ridge Middle School, our sixth grade moving from elementary to middle school, and our boundary change, we have advanced opportunities to even out capacity at each site to accommodate our programs, district-wide site capacity, and student-based needs. For the Six-Year Finance Plan, costs of future schools are based on estimates from Kent School District Capital Planning Team. Please see pages 13-14 for a summary of the cost basis. Cost Basis Summary For impact fee calculations, construction estimated costs are based on the last elementary school built in Kent, adjusted for inflation, and projected cost future elementary school, as well as average pricing of nearby school districts recently built new middle and new high school projects. Project Projected Cost New Elementary School $68,000,000 New Middle School $155,000,000 New High School $220,000,000 Site Acquisition Cost The site acquisition cost is based on an average cost of sites purchased or built on within the last ten years. Please see Table 7 for a list of site acquisition costs and averages. District Adjustment The impact fee calculations on Appendix B & C result in a zero-dollar impact fee total for this year but may be adjusted if needed per RCW 36.70A.130(2)(b) provision. 31 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 SIX-YEAR FINANCE PLAN Secured Unsecured Impact SCHOOL FACILITIES *2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 TOTAL Local & State State 2 or Local 3 Fees 5 Estimated Estimated PERMANENT FACILITIES No School Projects at this time.$0 TEMPORARY FACILITIES Additional portables 3 - 4 $0 OTHER N / A Totals $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 * F = Funded U = Unfunded NOTES: 2 The District anticipates receiving some State Funding Construction Assistance for some projects. 3 Facility needs are pending review. Some of these projects may be funded with impact fees. 4 Cost of portables based on current cost and adjusted for inflation for future years. 5 Fees in this column are based on amount of fees collected to date and estimated fees on future units. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 6 May 2024 32 AG E N D A I T E M # 2 . d ) KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 Site Acquisitions & Costs Average of Sites Purchased, Sold or Built on within last 10 Years Type & # on Map School / Site Year Open / Purchased Sold Location Acreage Cost/Price Avg cost-price/acre Total Average Cost / Acre Elementary No Acquisitions for Elemenary Schools 0.00 $0 Elementary Site Subtotal 0.00 $0 $0 Elem site average Middle School No Acquisitions for Middle Schools 0.00 $0 Middle School Site Subtotal 0.00 $0 $0 Middle Schl Site Avg. Senior High No Acquisitions for High Schools 0.00 $0 $0 Senior High Site Subtotal 0.00 $0 $0 Sr Hi Site Average Note: All rural sites were purchased prior to adoption of Urban Growth Area. Numbers correspond to locations on Site Bank & Acquisitions Map on Page 17. 1 / Urban Site - Covington area North (So of Mattson MS)1984 2 / Rural Site - Ham Lake east (Pollard)1992 4 / Urban Site - Shady Lake (Sowers-Blaine-Drahota-Paroline)1995 0.00 $0 5 / Rural Site - SE of Lake Morton area (West property)1993 0 0 0 9 / Rural Site - McMillan Assemblage (South of MC)98 - 04 10 / Urban Site - Yeh-Williams (W of 132 Ave SE at SE 288)1999 12a / Urban Site - 156th Ave. SE Covington (Wikstrom)2004 12b / Urban Site - SE 256th St. Covington (West of CO)2004 16 Site - 11027 SE Kent-Kangley, WA 98030 2023 Site - 11027 SE Kent-Kangley, WA 98030 0.9 $1,382,696.90 Land included building 16a Site - 11109 SE Kent-Kangley, WA 98030 2023 Site - 11109 SE Kent-Kangley, WA 98030 0.84 $1,744,009.52 Land included building Total Acreage & Cost Total Average Cost / Acre #DIV/0! Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 7 May 202233 AG E N D A I T E M # 2 . d ) IX - Summary of Changes to June 2025 Capital Facilities Plan The Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") is updated annually based on previous Plans in effect since 1993. The primary changes from the June 2024 Plan are summarized here. Capacity changes continue to reflect fluctuations in class size ratio and program changes. Changes in portables or transitional capacity reflect use, lease or purchase, sale, surplus and/or movement between facilities. The District worked with Educational Data Solutions, LLC to update student generation factors. The updated rates are included in the body of the Plan. The District expects to receive some State Funding Assistance (formerly called “state matching funds”) for projects in this Plan and tax credit factors are updated annually. Unfunded site and facility need will be reviewed in the future. The impact fees for 2025 calendar year will result in no collection of impact fees for both Single-Family and Multi-Family due to the capacity study completed in spring 2025. 34 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) X - Appendices KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT FACTORS FOR ESTIMATED IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS Changes to Impact Fee Calculation Factors Include: ITEM Grade /Type FROM TO Increase/ Decrease Comments Student Generation Factor Elem 0.229 0.222 -0.007 Single Family (SF) MS 0.087 0.092 0.005 SH 0.113 0.116 0.003 Total 0.429 0.430 0.001 Student Generation Factor Elem 0.109 0.075 -0.034 Multi-Family (MF) MS 0.037 0.030 -0.007 SH 0.054 0.032 -0.022 Total 0.200 0.137 -0.063 State Funding Assistance Ratios (“State Match”) 52.88% 54.31% 1.43% Per OSPI Website Area Cost Allowance $375.00 $375.00 0.000 Per OSPI Website Link Average Assessed Valuation (AV) SF $594,679 $657,970 63,291 King County AV - Average of Condominiums & Apts. MF $310,811 $320,116 9,305 King County Debt Service Capital Levy Rate / $1000 $1.11 $0.46 ($0.65) Per King Co. Assessor Report General Obligation Bond Interest Rate 3.48% 4.37% 0.89% Bond Buyers 20 year GO Index Impact Fee - Single Family SF $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 No Change Impact Fee - Multi-Family MF $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 No Change 35 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) The Issaquah School District No. 411 hereby provides this Capital Facilities Plan documenting present and future school facility requirements of the District. The plan contains all elements required by the Growth Management Act and King County Council Ordinance 21-A. The Issaquah School District No. 411 hereby provides this Capital Facilities Plan documenting present and future school facility requirements of the District. The plan contains all elements required by the Growth Management Act and King County Council Ordinance 21-A. Exhibit C AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Page 2 of 30 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................... 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................. 3 STANDARD OF SERVICE ............................................................................................................... 4 WHEN TO CONSTRUCT A NEW BUILDING .................................................................................. 5 ENROLLMENT METHODOLOGY .............................................................................................. 6-7 TABLE 1: ACTUAL STUDENT COUNTS & ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS ................................. 8 TABLE 1A: 10-YEAR LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH ENROLLMENT FORECAST .................................... 9 TABLE 2: ENROLLMENT HISTORY .............................................................................................10 TABLE 3: STUDENT FACTORS – SINGLE FAMILY & MULTI-FAMILY .......................................11 INVENTORY AND EVALUATION OF CURRENT FACILITIES .....................................................12 SITE LOCATION MAP ...................................................................................................................13 URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY MAP ...........................................................................................14 SIX-YEAR CONSTRUCTION PLAN ..............................................................................................15 TABLE 4: PROJECTED CAPACITY TO HOUSE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL STUDENTS ............16 TABLE 5: PROJECTED CAPACITY TO HOUSE MIDDLE SCHOOL STUDENTS .......................17 TABLE 6: PROJECTED CAPACITY TO HOUSE HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS ...........................18 APPENDIX A: 6-YEAR FINANCE PLAN ........................................................................................19 APPENDIX B: 2024-25 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CAPACITIES ..................................................20 APPENDIX C: 2024-25 MIDDLE SCHOOL CAPACITIES .............................................................21 APPENDIX D: 2024-25 HIGH SCHOOL CAPACITIES ..................................................................22 APPENDIX E: 2024-25 TOTAL SCHOOL CAPACITIES ...............................................................23 NEED FOR IMPACT FEES AND GROWTH-RELATED CAPACITY NEEDS ........................ 24-25 BASIS FOR DATA USED IN SCHOOL IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS ......................................26 SCHOOL IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS .....................................................................................27 APPENDIX F: STUDENT GENERATION RATES MEMO ..................................................... 28-30 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Page 3 of 30 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") has been prepared by the Issaquah School District (the “District”) as the District’s primary facility planning document for the period 2025–2031. The Plan is prepared in compliance with the Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA) and King County Council Code Title 21A. The GMA, enacted in 1990, requires fast-growing counties and cities to develop comprehensive plans to manage population growth, protect natural resources, and coordinate land use with public infrastructure—including schools. Under the GMA, school districts are required to plan for future facility needs and demonstrate that adequate capacity exists to support projected development. This Plan incorporates enrollment projections, facility capacities, and known development trends using the most current data available as of April 2025. This Plan represents an update to previously adopted long-term Capital Facilities Plans. While it serves as the District’s primary planning document for the six-year period, it is not intended to provide a static or exhaustive response to all facility needs. The District actively monitors enrollment trends, development activity, facility utilization, and educational program changes, and adjusts planning efforts to respond to evolving conditions. As necessary, the District may develop interim or supplemental long-range Capital Facilities Plans consistent with Board policy and informed by updated data and forecasts. All such plans will align with the overall direction and framework provided in this Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan. In June 1992, the District first requested that King County impose and collect school impact fees on new developments in unincorporated areas. The King County Council adopted the District’s initial plan and implementing ordinance on November 16, 1992. This Plan represents the District’s annual update to the Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan. King County and the cities of Issaquah, Renton, Bellevue, Newcastle, and Sammamish currently collect school impact fees on behalf of the District. Most jurisdictions provide exemptions for senior housing and certain types of low-income housing. In accordance with the requirements of the Growth Management Act, the District will continue to update this Plan on an annual basis, with adjustments to the fee schedule(s) as needed to reflect current data and conditions. AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Page 4 of 30 STANDARD OF SERVICE School facility and student capacity needs are dictated by the types and amounts of space required to accommodate the District’s adopted educational program. The educational program standards which typically drive facility space needs include State-mandated requirements and locally adopted programming decisions relevant to grade configuration, optimal facility size, class size, educational program offerings, as well as classroom utilization and scheduling requirements and use of re- locatable classroom facilities (portables). Class sizes vary by grade level and program to reflect the differing instructional needs of students, including those in special education and highly capable programs. The Issaquah School Board has established local class size standards, which are maintained through the use of local levy funds. The District uses an average class size of 20 students for grades K–5, 26 students for grades 6–8, and 28 students for grades 9–12 when calculating building capacities. Special education class sizes are based on an average of 12 students per classroom. The District has offered Full-Day Kindergarten since the 2016–2017 school year. For the purposes of capacity analysis, rooms designated for special use, consistent with King County Council Code Title 21A, are excluded from classroom counts. Invariably, some classrooms will have student loads greater in number than this average level of service and some will be smaller. Program demands, state and federal requirements, collective bargaining agreements, and available funding may also affect this level of service in the years to come. Due to these variables, a utilization factor of 95% is used to adjust design capacities to what a building may actually accommodate. Historically, in Capital Facilities Plans, the ISD has used a utilization rate of 95% which is very conservative. Other districts use utilization rates between 70% to 85%. Lower utilization rates have the effect of showing less capacity. Portables used as classrooms accommodate enrollment increases for interim purposes until permanent classrooms are available. In addition to serving temporary capacity needs, portables also provide flexible instructional space that can be adapted to changing programmatic or scheduling requirements. When permanent facilities become available, portables may be relocated to other school sites to address emerging needs or removed from service, depending on long-term facility planning. The District currently has one undeveloped site, planned for a new high school and future elementary school. The State does not provide funding for property purchases. The District’s voters approved the 2016 Bond to provide funding for a new high school, new middle school, two new elementary schools, a rebuild/expansion of an existing middle school and additions to six existing elementary schools. All of those projects are now complete with the exception of the new high school and one new elementary school. The new high school is discussed further in this Capital Facilities Plan and will require additional funding sources. The new elementary school is on indefinite hold until capacity at the elementary level is needed. In 2022 voters approved a capital levy in amount of $44,000,000 to help pay for the new comprehensive high school. Unfortunately, due to construction cost escalation from conditions surrounding the pandemic, this amount plus other capital funds the district already had, was still not sufficient to build the full comprehensive high school as planned and designed. The District is currently working through a plan to build a portion of the new high using the funds from the previously approved levy and other dedicated capital funds. This plan would help alleviate some of the overcrowding at the high school level but would not solve the issue entirely. AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Page 5 of 30 WHEN TO CONSTRUCT A NEW BUILDING The Issaquah School District Capital Facilities Plan proposes construction of a new high school to meet capacity needs at the high school level related to recent enrollment growth. The District in recent years, funded by the 2016 Bond, completed construction of a new elementary school, Cedar Trails Elementary School, a new middle school, Cougar Mountain Middle School, as well as additions at several elementary schools, all to help address recent growth needs. The need for new schools and school additions is triggered by comparing our enrollment forecasts with our permanent capacity figures. These forecasts are by grade level and, to the extent possible, by geography. The analysis provides a list of new construction needed by school year. The decision on when to construct a new facility involves factors other than verified need. Funding is the most serious consideration. Factors including the potential tax rate for our citizens, the availability of state funds and impact fees, the ability to acquire land, and the ability to pass bonds and capital levies determine when any new facility can be constructed. New school facilities are a response, in part, to new housing which the county or cities have approved for construction. The District's Six-Year Finance Plan is shown in Appendix A. AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Page 6 of 30 ENROLLMENT METHODOLOGY Development Tracking and Student Generation Rates In order to increase the accuracy and validity of enrollment projections, a major emphasis has been placed on the collection and tracking data of known new housing developments. This data provides two useful pieces of planning information. First, it is used to determine the actual number of students that are generated from a single family or multi-family residence. Secondly, it provides important information on the impact new housing developments will have on existing facilities and/or the need for additional facilities. Developments that have been completed or are still selling houses are used to forecast the number of students who will attend our schools from future developments. The District used a third-party consultant to review recent development data and provide updated student generation rates for elementary school, middle school and high school student per new single-family residence and new multi-family housing. Updated rates are shown in Table 3. Enrollment Methodology The District uses two primary methods to estimate future student enrollment. These projections are inherently variable and are influenced by local land use decisions, market conditions, economic factors, and regional infrastructure improvements, including major transit projects. As such, the District analyzes a range of scenarios and, for planning purposes, adopts the high-range projection to ensure adequate capacity is available to meet potential growth. 1. The student 3-2-1 cohort survival method. Examine Issaquah School District enrollments for the last 5 years and determine the average cohort survival for the consecutive five-year period. Because cohort survival does not consider students generated from new development it is a conservative projection of actual enrollment. For the same reason, these projections are also slow to react to actual growth. The cohort method is also hampered by the fact that it does not account for anomalies affecting enrollment (i.e., the Covid-19 pandemic, temporary remote learning and the variations in the transition back to in-person learning). 2. Based on information from King County, realtors, developers, etc., the District seeks to establish the number of new dwelling units that will be sold each year and converts those units to new students based on the following: a) The number of actual new students as a percentage of actual new dwellings for the past several years. (The student generation factors are shown in Table 3) b) Determine the actual distribution of new students by grade level for the past several years, i.e., 5% to kindergarten, 10% to first grade, 2% to 11th grade, etc. c) Based on an examination of the history shown by (a) and (b) above, establish the most likely factor to apply to the projected new dwellings. After applying these methods, current enrollment is moved forward year-by-year, with adjustments for anticipated new students. It is important to note that while new housing typically signals growth, enrollment may decline even as population increases. This occurs as communities mature, resulting in fewer young children per household. To address this, the District monitors the number of school-age children per dwelling and adjusts projections accordingly, particularly at the kindergarten level. However, no precise statistical formula currently exists to capture these shifts perfectly. AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Page 7 of 30 ENROLLMENT METHODOLOGY (cont.) Past experience has shown that cohort-based projections tend to be more accurate over longer periods (e.g., 10 years), while development-based projections are more reliable in the short term. Recognizing this, the District examines both methods and adopts a projection range. For planning purposes, the high projection is used to ensure the District is prepared to meet growth-related facility needs (Table 1A). Enrollment projections for the 2025–26 through 2030–31 school years are provided in Table 1. Although modest increases are anticipated during this period, the District does not expect to return to historical peak enrollment levels in the near term. Several factors are expected to influence future enrollment, including: • Market conditions, such as housing supply and affordability • Regional labor trends that affect family relocation and job accessibility • Residential development activity within the District’s boundaries • Major infrastructure projects, particularly the planned Sound Transit light rail extension to the City of Issaquah, which is likely to: o Increase residential density near transit stations o Attract new families due to enhanced commuter access o Contribute to long-term enrollment growth beyond the current six-year planning horizon The City of Issaquah’s 2044 Comprehensive Plan anticipates zoning and infrastructure to support more than 14,000 new housing units, with 3,500 targeted by 2044. These units, concentrated in areas such as Central Issaquah and the Issaquah Highlands, are expected to impact school enrollment over the next two decades. While substantial increases in student population are not expected within the current six-year planning horizon, significant growth is projected in the 15-to-20-year timeframe. The District will continue to monitor local development activity, housing trends, and transit infrastructure plans to refine its projections and update future Capital Facilities Plans accordingly. Ongoing coordination with the City of Issaquah will be essential in planning for future school capacity, especially in areas of anticipated high-density development and transit access. AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Page 8 of 30 TABLE 1: ACTUAL STUDENT COUNTS & ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS ACTUAL STUDENT COUNTS: 2024-25 ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS: 2025-26 THRU 2030-31 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Page 9 of 30 TABLE 1A: 10-YEAR LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH ENROLLMENT FORECAST The District uses the high enrollment forecast shown in the chart above as the basis for long-range facilities planning. While actual enrollment may align more closely with medium or low projections over the short term, relying on the high projection allows the District to proactively address potential capacity needs and avoid underbuilding in the face of uncertain future growth. This approach ensures that school facilities can accommodate increases in student population that may result from market conditions, housing development, or regional infrastructure projects. Using the high forecast reflects a conservative and responsible planning strategy that prioritizes preparedness and long-term flexibility. AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Page 10 of 30 TABLE 2: ENROLLMENT HISTORY The 10-Year Enrollment History table provides critical context for interpreting the six-year enrollment projections presented in Table 1. These historical headcounts, based on October 1st data, illustrate key enrollment trends, including a peak in 2019–20, a decline during the COVID-19 pandemic, and modest stabilization in recent years. It is important to clarify that the high projection presented in Table 1 does not rely solely on a traditional cohort progression model, where student counts are advanced from grade to grade based strictly on historical trends. Instead, the high forecast incorporates additional factors such as projected housing development, updated student generation rates, and regional influences—including the planned Sound Transit light rail extension into Issaquah. This approach allows the District to plan proactively for potential enrollment increases that may arise from new residential growth and infrastructure investments, ensuring school facilities can accommodate a range of future scenarios. AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Page 11 of 30 TABLE 3: STUDENT FACTORS – SINGLE FAMILY & MULTI-FAMILY Table 1 provides student generation rates (SGRs) based on recent housing development within the District. These rates quantify the average number of students generated per new single-family and multi-family housing unit by grade level and are a critical input for projecting future enrollment and assessing the impact of residential growth on school facility needs. AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Page 12 of 30 INVENTORY AND EVALUATION OF CURRENT FACILITIES Currently, using the 95% utilization factor, the District has the capacity to house 18,630 students in permanent facilities and an additional 4,688 students in portables. While portables are critical for meeting short-term enrollment fluctuations, they are not considered a viable long-term solution for capacity planning. For that reason, the District relies on its adjusted permanent capacity when determining growth-related needs. The projected student enrollment for the 2025–26 school year is 18,355, leaving a modest districtwide surplus of 275 permanent seats. However, this overall surplus does not reflect the ongoing imbalance across grade levels. High school enrollment continues to exceed permanent capacity, and projections show that this pressure will persist throughout the six-year planning period. As a result, the District remains focused on identifying long-term solutions to address high school overcrowding, even as elementary and middle school capacity remains sufficient. Calculations of elementary, middle school, and high school capacities are provided in Appendices B, C, and D, respectively. These facility locations and sites are shown on the District Site Location Map. EXISTING FACILITIES LOCATION GRADE SPAN K-5: Apollo Elementary 15025 S.E. 117th Street, Renton Briarwood Elementary 17020 S.E. 134th Street, Renton Cascade Ridge Elementary 2020 Trossachs Blvd. S.E., Sammamish Cedar Trails Elementary 4399 Issaquah-Pine Lake Rd S.E. , Sammamish Challenger Elementary 25200 S.E. Klahanie Blvd., Issaquah Clark Elementary 335 First Ave. S.E., Issaquah Cougar Ridge Elementary 4630 167th Ave. S.E., Bellevue Creekside Elementary 20777 SE 16th Street, Sammamish Discovery Elementary 2300 228th Ave. S.E., Sammamish Endeavour Elementary 26205 S.E. Issaquah-Fall City Rd., Issaquah Grand Ridge Elementary 1739 NE Park Drive, Issaquah Issaquah Valley Elementary 555 N.W. Holly Street, Issaquah Maple Hills Elementary 15644 204th Ave. S.E., Issaquah Newcastle Elementary 8440 136th Ave S.E., Newcastle Sunny Hills Elementary 3200 Issaquah-Pine Lake Rd. S.E., Sammamish Sunset Elementary 4229 W. Lk. Sammamish Pkwy. S.E., Issaquah GRADE SPAN 6-8: Beaver Lake Middle School 25025 S.E. 32nd Street, Issaquah Cougar Mountain Middle School 1929 NW Talus Dr, Issaquah Issaquah Middle School 600 2nd Ave. Ave. S.E., Issaquah Maywood Middle School 14490 168th Ave. S.E., Renton Pacific Cascade Middle School 24635 SE Issaquah-Fall City Rd, Issaquah Pine Lake Middle School 3095 Issaquah-Pine Lake Rd., Sammamish GRADE SPAN 9-12: Issaquah High School 700 Second Ave. S.E., Issaquah Liberty High School 16655 S.E. 136th Street, Renton Skyline High School 1122 228th Ave. S.E., Sammamish Gibson Ek High School 379 First Ave. S.E., Issaquah SUPPORT SERVICES: Administration Building 5150 220th Ave S.E., Issaquah Holly Street Early Learning Center 565 N.W. Holly Street, Issaquah May Valley Service Center 16404 S.E. May Valley Road, Renton Transportation Center - Main 805 Second Avenue S.E., Issaquah Transportation Center - Satellite 3402 228th Ave. S.E., Sammamish AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Page 13 of 30 SITE LOCATION MAP AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Page 14 of 30 URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY MAP AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Page 15 of 30 SIX-YEAR CONSTRUCTION PLAN The District's Six-Year Finance Plan is shown in Appendix A. State funding and impact fees are also not reliable sources of revenue for construction related projects. State funding is available only for certain qualifying school construction projects, with funds received only after the matched project is complete. Site acquisition and site improvements are not eligible to receive state matching funds. Impact fee revenue is dependent on growth activity and not always easy to predict. As a result, the District must also rely on voter-approved ballot measures to fund school construction. Table 6 presents the District’s projected capacity to accommodate high school students, including the addition of a new high school facility. In April 2016, voters approved a $533 million bond to fund a range of capital projects, including land acquisition and construction of a new high school, a new middle school, two new elementary schools, the rebuild and expansion of an existing middle school, and additions to six existing elementary schools. To support the high school project further, voters passed a $44 million capital levy in April 2022. These funds will be used to construct a new high school to alleviate overcrowding at existing campuses. The District also anticipates receiving State matching funds for the high school project, which will be applied back to the project. AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Page 16 of 30 TABLE 4: PROJECTED CAPACITY TO HOUSE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL STUDENTS AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Page 17 of 30 TABLE 5: PROJECTED CAPACITY TO HOUSE MIDDLE SCHOOL STUDENTS AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Page 18 of 30 TABLE 6: PROJECTED CAPACITY TO HOUSE HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS As shown in Table 6, the District’s high school enrollment is projected to exceed existing permanent capacity beginning in 2025 and continuing through the 6-year planning period. In 2025 and 2026, the District is expected to operate with a permanent capacity deficit of over 1,000 students after accounting for a 95% utilization rate. To address this growing enrollment pressure, the District will add permanent capacity for 656 high school students in 2027 through the construction of a new high school facility. This added capacity significantly reduces the shortfall, bringing the permanent capacity deficit down to fewer than 400 students and continuing to narrow the gap through 2030. As needed to address capacity needs, before the high school addition is complete, the District may consider adjusting the building utilization factor to create additional interim capacity. With this new capacity in place, the District will be positioned to phase out its reliance on portable classrooms. While portables will still be required in the short term, the addition of permanent space sets the stage for a gradual reduction in their use. This transition will enhance the learning environment and promote more equitable access to core instructional spaces and amenities. The strategy aligns with the District’s long-term capital planning goals and its commitment to providing equitable, high-quality educational facilities across all attendance areas. AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Page 19 of 30 APPENDIX A: 6-YEAR FINANCE PLAN AG E N D A I T E M # 2 . d ) Page 20 of 30 APPENDIX B: 2024-25 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CAPACITIES AG E N D A I T E M # 2 . d ) Page 21 of 30 APPENDIX C: 2024-25 MIDDLE SCHOOL CAPACITIES AG E N D A I T E M # 2 . d ) Page 22 of 30 APPENDIX D: 2024-25 HIGH SCHOOL CAPACITIES AG E N D A I T E M # 2 . d ) Page 23 of 30 APPENDIX E: 2024-25 TOTAL SCHOOL CAPACITIES AG E N D A I T E M # 2 . d ) Page 24 of 30 NEED FOR IMPACT FEES AND GROWTH-RELATED CAPACITY NEEDS The District historically relied on school impact fee revenue to help fund growth-related capacity needs. However, by law, impact fees can only be used to fund a portion of a growth-related capacity project. As demonstrated in Appendix B the District currently has a permanent capacity (at 95%) to serve 8,763 students at the elementary level. This leaves the District’s elementary enrollment under permanent capacity by 901 students (current enrollment is identified in Table 1). As demonstrated in Appendix C the District currently has a permanent capacity (at 95%) to serve 4,946 students at the middle school level. This leaves the District’s middle school enrollment under permanent capacity by 469 students (current enrollment is identified in Table 1). As demonstrated in Appendix D the District currently has a permanent capacity (at 95%) to serve 4,921 students at the high school level. This leaves the District’s high school enrollment over permanent capacity by 1,095 students (current enrollment is identified in Table 1). The capacity need is driven by historic and recent growth. However, the District’s six-year enrollment projections in Table 1 demonstrate that the District does not anticipate growth to occur over the six-year planning period. Thus, while the high school capacity need remains significant, it is not related to anticipated growth in the six-year period and, therefore, the project is no longer eligible as a basis for impact fees. Future updates to this CFP will consider growth-related eligibility for inclusion in the impact fee formula. Based on the District’s student generation rates (Table 3), the District expects that 0.615 students will be generated from each new single family home and 0.189 students will be generated from each new multi-family dwelling unit. Comparatively, the previous year SGR’s were 0.641 for single family home and 0.159 for a multi-family unit. Applying the enrollment projections contained in Table 1 to the District’s existing permanent capacity (Appendices A, B, and C) and if no capacity improvements are made by the year 2029-30, and permanent capacity is adjusted to 95%, the District elementary population will be under its permanent capacity by 659 students, under permanent capacity at the middle school level by 838 students, and over permanent capacity by 778 students at the high school level. Importantly, the above figures incorporate recently completed growth-projects at the elementary and middle school levels. The District recently opened the new Cougar Mountain Middle School, with permanent capacity of 828, and the new Cedar Trails Elementary School, with permanent capacity of 496 students. Both schools were funded by the April 2016 bond and provide capacity to serve new growth. AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Page 25 of 30 NEED FOR IMPACT FEES AND GROWTH-RELATED CAPACITY NEEDS (cont) In those years when the District requests school impact fees for growth-related projects, the school impact fee formula ensures that new development only pays for the cost of the facilities nec essitated by new development. The fee calculations examine the costs of housing the students generated by each new single family dwelling unit or each new multi-family dwelling unit and then reduces that amount by credits for the anticipated state match and future tax payments. The resulting impact fee is then discounted as required by local ordinances. Thus, by applying the student generation factor to the school project costs, the fee formula only calculates the costs of providing capacity to serve eac h new dwelling unit. The formula does not require new development to contribute the costs of providing capacity to address existing needs. The King County Council and the City Councils of the cities of Bellevue, Issaquah, Newcastle, Renton and Sammamish have created a framework for collecting school impact fees and the District can demonstrate that new developments will have an impact on the District. Impact fees must be used in a manner consistent with RCW 82.02.050-110 and the adopted local ordinances. Engrossed Senate Bill 5923, enacted in the 2015 Legislative Session, requires that developers be provided an option to defer payment of impact fees to final inspection, certificate of occupancy, or closing, with no fees deferred longer than 18 months from building permit issuance. The District adopts the positions that: (1) no school impact fee should be collected later than the earlier of final inspection or 18 months from the time of building permit issuance; and (2) no developer applicant should be permitted to defer payment of school impact fees for more than 20 dwelling units in a single year. The District is not requesting school impact fees as a part of this 2025 Capital Facilities Plan update. AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Page 26 of 30 BASIS FOR DATA USED IN SCHOOL IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS This section is not updated for the 2025 Capital Facilities Plan since the District is not requesting a school impact fee. Future updates to this CFP may include an impact fee. AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Page 27 of 30 SCHOOL IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS This section is not updated for the 2025 Capital Facilities Plan since the District is not requesting a school impact fee. Future updates to this CFP may include an impact fee. AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Page 28 of 30 APPENDIX F: STUDENT GENERATION RATES MEMO AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Page 29 of 30 APPENDIX F: STUDENT GENERATION RATES MEMO (cont) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Page 30 of 30 APPENDIX F: STUDENT GENERATION RATES MEMO (cont) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) D>‘énton CAPITAL PLANNING SCHOOL DISTRICT AND CONSTRUCTION SERVICE |EXCELLENCE |EQUITY DATE:June 16,2025 TO:Dr.Damien Pattenaude,Superintendent FROM:Matt Feldmeyer,Executive Director,Capital Planning and Construction Mee Ss FOR BOARD MEETING:June 25,2025 G/\e/2 CONSENT AGENDAITEM:2025-2031 Capital Facilities Plan A Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan,to be updated annually,is required by the Washington State Growth Management Act and the School Impact Fee Ordinance Act,of King County,Code Title 21A.If serves as a guide to the development of school facilities and forms the basis for the calculation of school impact fees that are imposed on new development by King County and the cities whose service areas overlap the Renton School District. The Plan is intended to evaluate the need for future facilities based on forecast enrollment growth and student capacity of existing facilities.The Plan also identifies potential sources of funding for additional construction or acquisition. DISTRICT GOALS: Removing Barriers &Supporting Students BUDGET IMPLICATION: This item has no budget implication. RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the District's 2025 Capital Facilities Plan. Attachment:2025 Capital Facilities Plan Recommendations: |haye reviewed ang |a i.i _ jennifer A.(Fprmer /pe ‘Agsistant Stperintendent of Finance and Operations/CFO SERVICE |EXCELLENCE |EQUITY 7812 S 124 St,Seattle,Washington 98178-4830 |p.425.204.4403 |£.425.204.4476 Exhibit D AGENDA ITEM #2. d) 1 2025 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Renton School District No. 403 Board of Directors Stefanie McIrvin, Ed. D, President Justin Booker, Vice President Avanti Bergquist, MD Susan Talley Pam Teal Damien Pattenaude, Ed. D, Superintendent Adopted: _June 25, 2025_ AGENDA ITEM #2. d) 2025 SIX YEAR CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Renton School District No. 403 TABLE OF CONTENTS II. II. IV. VI. VIL. VII. INTRODUCTION ENROLLMENT TRENDS STANDARD OF SERVICE & CAPACITY ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS GROWTH RELATED PROJECTS SIX-YEAR FINANCE PLAN IMPACT FEES APPENDICES AGENDA ITEM #2. d) I. INTRODUCTION Purpose of the Capital Facilities Plan: This Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan (the “Plan”)is prepared by the Renton School District (the “District”) in compliance with the requirements of the Washington State Growth Management Act (the “GMA”), King County Code, and applicable ordinances of the cities of Bellevue, Newcastle, and Renton. The Plan was prepared using data available in the spring of 2025. The GMA outlines 14 broad goals including adequate provision of necessary public facilities and services. Schools are among these necessary facilities and services. School districts adopt capital facilities plans to satisfy the requirements of RCW 36.70A.070 and to identify additional school facilities necessary to meet the educational needs of the growing student populations anticipated in their districts. It is the District’s intent that the Plan be adopted by King County and the cities of Bellevue, Newcastle, Renton, SeaTac, and Tukwila as a sub-element of their respective Capital Facilities Plans. Currently, King County and the cities of Bellevue, Newcastle, and Renton collect school impact fees on behalf of the District when requested. The Capital Facilities Plan contains the following required elements: 1. Enrollment forecasts for each grade span over the next six years. 2. Aninventory of the existing capital facilities owned by the District and capacity of those facilities based on the District’s current Standard of Service. 3. A forecast of future needs for capital facilities and the proposed capacities of expanded or new facilities. 4. A six-year plan for financing those capital improvements. As relevant, a calculation of school impact fees and data substantiating such fees.5. Overview of the Renton School District: The District is located on the south end of Lake Washington,eleven miles southeast of Seattle and eleven miles south of Bellevue. Home to more than 100,000 people who value working, living, and playing in the Pacific Northwest, Renton has a strong economic base and a favorable business climate. The District spans approximately thirty-two square miles and serves a diverse population of approximately 14,000 students in pre-K through 12th grade at four high schools, four middle schools, sixteen elementary schools, and an early childhood learning center. District programs also address the special needs of disabled, academically gifted, and artistically talented students. Three schools (Renton Park Elementary, McKnight Middle, and Lindbergh High) are U.S. Department of Education-recognized Blue-Ribbon Schools of Excellence. Community support for Renton schools is strong. School levies, which make up 25% of the district's budget, have been consistently approved by the community for more than 20 years. Voter-approved bond measures or capital facilities levies from 1992 through 2022 have brought exciting improvements in school buildings and support facilities, including the rebuilding of all AGENDA ITEM #2. d) elementary schools, the remodeling of most middle and high schools, and the recent additional construction of two new elementary schools (Sartori and Hilltop Heritage) and a middle school (Risdon). Voter support has also provided state-of-the-art technology -a must to prepare students for living and working in this leading high-tech region. Every classroom has high-speed Internet connections and ample computer devices for all students. Ensuring each student graduates with options and is prepared to participate fully in our democracy is at the heart of Renton School District's mission. Three core values of Service, Excellence, and Equity guide the district’s strategic framework in family and community engagement, excellence in learning and teaching, and removing barriers and supporting students. Students are encouraged to reach for excellence through a variety of programs that focus on rigorous academic skills, problem solving, creative and critical thinking, and social and emotional growth. Renton School District staff are committed to preparing all students for success in their post-secondary journey. Teachers are encouraged to take an active role in promoting their own professional growth through collaborating on the use and development of high-quality instructional materials, sharing successful strategies, and looking for new ways to assess student progress. This focus on continuous staff development enables teachers to consistently improve the quality of instruction and prepares them to help students meet rigorous state academic standards. The District’s voters in 2019 approved a $249.6 M bond measure to fund a new elementary school (Hilltop Heritage Elementary School) to accommodate enrollment needs. Sartori Elementary School opened in 2018 as a choice school, providing additional capacity relief. The voters in November 2022 approved a $676 M bond to fund property acquisition and construction of a new Renton High School and security, seismic, and building systems updates at various schools throughout the District. Property acquisition is currently in process and the high school project is in the design phase currently. In recent years the District’s K-12 enrollment has seen an overall decline. Consistent with much of the region, the District’s enrollment was affected by the global pandemic, lower birth rates, and increases in home based school instruction. The number of new homes planned for future construction in the District continues to be higher than the number of permitted units that were built between 2019 and 2023. The District anticipates, based on recent enrollment projections, that enrollment at all grade levels is likely to see a small decrease over the six year planning period. The District plans to monitor actual enrollment patterns closely and will incorporate new information as a part of future updates to this Plan. AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Il. STANDARD OF SERVICE & CAPACITY The District’s Standard of Service is the standard adopted by the District that identifies the program year, school organizational structure, student/teacher ratios by grade level (considering the requirements of students with special needs), daily class schedule, types of facilities and other factors identified by the District as necessary to support its educational programs and objectives. The Standardof Service is used to ascertain current and future capacity. It should also be noted that although the State Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square foot guidelines for capacity funding criteria, those guidelines do not account for the actual program needs in the District. The Growth Management Act and King County Code 21A.43 authorize the District to adjust the standard of service based on the District's specific needs. The District uses a traditional elementary (K-5)/middle (6-8)/high school (9-12) organizational structure. The District, and the Renton Education Association, recognize that reasonable class size is necessary for optimum learning, and have established the following targets in student/teacher ratios for most regular classroom purposes: Students receive instruction in classes such as band/orchestra, choir, physical education at a larger ratio based on program and space. Student /teacher ratio for special education classes held in self-contained classrooms within comprehensive elementary and secondary facilities is assumed to be 12:1. Educational facilities dedicated solely to special education or other specialized programs are excluded from capacity calculations, as are associated student headcounts. At the high school level, due to adopted State and local graduation requirements,it is not possible to achieve 100% utilization of regular teaching stations. Based on actual utilization due to these considerations, the District uses a standard utilization rate of 80% at the high school level (4 out of 5 periods) for determining high school capacity. Beginning with the graduating class of 2020-2021, high school graduation requirements require one additional credit of science (three instead of two), and a total of twenty-four credits; three more than the previously required 21. This requirement impacts high school capacity as well. Additionally, similar to the high school utilization rate, a typical middle school utilizes a six period day and requires that one period be designated for teacher planning. This requirement reduces middle school capacity by one-sixth, or 17 percent. Student/teacher ratios are applicable to both permanent and relocatable classrooms. However, since relocatable facilities do not allow for the full range of educational activities promoted by the District, they are generally viewed as temporary or interim housing, necessary to Grade Levels K-1 21% Grade Level 2 22:1 Grade Level 3 24:1 Grade Levels 4-12 29:1 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) accommodate enrollment fluctuations and interim development driven enrollment increases until such time as permanentfacilities can be financed and constructed. For those reasons,relocatable classrooms capacities are calculated, but not used in the analysis of future facility needs. Using the Standard of Service, the District calculates building capacity for each of its facilities. The calculation is made by reviewing the use of each classroom/teaching station in each facility in collaboration with individual school leadership. Spaces in buildings used for special program purposes such as special education and alternative learning environments are not included in the District’s regular classroom capacity. Core facilities, such as the cafeteria or gymnasium,are not considered regular classrooms. A building’s regular classroom capacity may change from year to year. For example,if the school enrollment has a higher number of special education students in a given year, there is potential that a teaching station is removed from the capacity inventory, thereby reducing the overall school capacity for that given year. Capacity at the secondary school level is further limited by the previously identified class scheduling restrictions and student distribution among elective classes. Based on a typical middle school six-period day, where one period is designated for teacher planning, capacity is reduced by one-sixth, or 17 percent of theoretical capacity. Similarly, at high schools with a five-period day, capacity is reduced for a teacher planning period by one-fifth, or 20 percent. Elective classes, many of which require specialized classrooms, also figure into the equation for determining a school’s capacity, which together with required classes, require a well thought out master schedule if the facility’s capacity is to be maximized. The District’s capital facilities include both permanent structures and relocatable (interim or portable) classrooms. The District’s permanent K-12 facilities include 16 elementary schools, four middle schools, and four high schools. Two Special Instructional Use facilities house the District’s early childhood, special education, and alternative learning programs. Support facilities include the Kohlwes Education Center (District administration), Transportation Center, Facilities Operations and Maintenance Center, Nutrition Services/Warehouse, Renton Memorial Stadium, and the Lindbergh Swimming Pool. Total permanent facilities encompass 2,670,757 square feet, with 2,495,051 square feet (93%) devoted to K-12 and instructional special use. See Appendix A for District Maps. The District currently has a permanent K-12 facilities capacity of 15,342 (including the opening of Hilltop Heritage Elementary School fall of 2023). See Tables 1 & 2 below and Appendix B. Importantly, current and future capacity at the elementary level, as documented in this report, is based on the District’s current Standard of Service, and does not necessarily reflect aspirational K-3 student/teacher ratios of seventeen students to one teacher. The District continues to make progress towards these requirements, by utilizing available classroom space, added staffing and plans to utilize the new elementary school classrooms to work towards this ratio. Most recent ratios have been anywhere from 17.3 to 19:1 but staffing recent enrollment changes and budget impacts have slowed the district’s progress. The District relocatable or portable facilities are used primarily to address enrollment fluctuations and to house students on an interim or temporary basis until permanent facilities can Current Capacity: AGENDA ITEM #2. d) || be constructed. For those reasons they are not considered a long-term solution for housing students and are not considered “permanent” capacity. Of the 55 relocatable facilities in the ” containing two classrooms (approximately 1,792District’s inventory, 46 are “double portables square feet together), and nine are singles (each approximately 896 square feet). See Appendix B. Combined, they provide the District with a total of 101 relocatable classrooms, encompassing 90,496 square feet of additional space available for instruction. The tables below summarize existing K-12 permanent and portable classroom capacity. See also Appendix B for detail by school building. Table 1 -Existing Permanent and Portable Capacity by Grade Level FACILITY ELEMENTARY HIGH SCHOOLS TOTAL (K-12)TYPE SCHOOLS MIDDLE SCHOOLS Total TotalTotal Total Capacity/Permanent to Capacity/Permanent to Capacity/Permanent to Capacity/Permanent to Portable PortablePortable Portable 4,458 97.97% 15,342 89.02%PERMANENT 7,449 85.61% 3,435 86.22% 92 2.03% 1,892 10.98%RELOCATABLE 1,252 14.39% 548 13.76% TOTAL 8,701 100.00% 3,984 100.00% 4,550 100.00% 17,235 100.00% AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Table 2 -Inventory and Capacity of Permanent Facilities PROGRAM NAME LOCATION AREA (ft?) CAPACITY Benson Hill 18665 116th Ave. SE, Renton, 98058 67,533 520 Bryn Mawr 8212 S 118th St., Seattle, 98178 49,157 338 Campbell Hill 6418 S 124th St., Seattle, 98178 57,072 332 Cascade 16022 116th Ave. SE, Renton, 98058 59,164 467 a Hazelwood 7100 116th Ave. SE, Newcastle, 98056 66,161 591 5 Highlands 2727 NE 7th St., Renton, 98056 60,000 547 9 Hilltop Heritage 1075 Duvall Ave NE 98059 79,881 554 a Honey Dew 800 Union Ave. NE, Renton, 98059 54,620 336 z Kennydale 1700 NE 28th St., Renton, 98056 65,169 622 i Lakeridge 7400 S 115th St. Seattle, 98178 52,958 398 S Maplewood Hgts. 130 Jericho Ave., Renton, 98059 56,220 402 a Renton Park 16828 128th Ave. SE, Renton, 98058 65,955 476 m Sartori 332 Park Ave. N, Renton, 98057 76,797 554 Sierra Heights 2501 Union Ave. NE, Renton, 98058 53,992 472 Talbot Hill 2300 Talbot Rd., Renton, 98055 57,844 460 Tiffany Park 1601 Lake Youngs Way, Renton, 98058 58,758 380 Total Grades K-5 Capacity 981,281 7,449 Dimmitt 12320 -80th Ave. S, Seattle, 98178 109,070 794 WY McKnight 2600 NE 12th St., Renton, 98056 126,706 847 —! a SB Nelsen 2304 Jones Ave. S, Renton, 98055 124,234 896 = o Risdon 6928 -116th Ave. SE, Newcastle 98056 133,934 898 Total Grades 6-8 Capacity 493,944 3,435 a Hazen 1101 Hoquiam Ave. NE, Renton, 98059 327,395 1,462 3 Lindbergh 16426 -128th Ave. SE, Renton, 98058 242,662 1,211 © Renton 400 S 2nd St., Renton, 98057 278,373 1,389 2 Talley 7800 S 132nd St., Renton, 98178 70,831 397 oO = Total Grades 9-11 Capacity 919,261 4,458 TOTAL GRADE LEVELS K-12 2,394,486 15,342| 6 Meadow Crest ELC 1800 Index Ave. NE, Renton, 98056 68,752 464 2 = HOME Program -Spring Glen 2607 Jones Ave. S, Renton, 98055 7,008 84 < WW Renton Academy 2607 Jones Ave. S, Renton, 98055 24,805 48 Z Total Instructional Special Use 100,565 596 Total Instructional Facilities 2,495,051 15,938 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) | Facilities Operations Center 7812 S 124th St., Seattle, 98178 21,894 57,200Kohlwes Educational Center 300 SW 7th St., Renton, 98057 16740 -128th Ave. SE, Renton,ia 13,7102 Lindbergh Pool 98058 a Nutrition Services / iB Warehouse 409 S Tobin St., Renton 98057 27,466 & Renton Memorial Stadium 405 Logan Ave. N, Renton, 98057 35,193 20,243a Transportation Center 420 Park Ave. N, Renton, 98057 175,706Total Support Services 2,670,757|Total All Permanent Facilities Undeveloped Property The District currently has the following undeveloped real property in its inventory: Skyway Site S Langston Rd. & 76th Ave. S, Seattle 4.18 Acres AGENDA ITEM #2. d) D IV. ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS The District saw consistent year over year growth between 2011 and 2018. In 2019, enrollment started to decline slightly and, like most school districts, the District’s enrollment was impacted by the global pandemic and temporary closure of in-person learning. The District’s enrollment has continued to decline between 2021 and 2025. Using medium growth projections, the District expects that its enrollmentwill continue to decline approximately | percent each year for the next six-year planning period. Numerous methodologies are available for projecting long-term enrollments. The most common method is known as cohort survival which tracks groups of students through the system and adjusts the populations to accountfor the average year-to-year growth. For example, fourth grade enrollment is adjusted based on the average enrollment trend of the past in order to estimate next year’s fifth grade enrollment. This calculation method considers the past five years’ trends to determine the average adjustmentfactor for each grade, or cohort. The method works well for all grades except kindergarten, where there is no previous year data. For kindergarten, two methodologies are generally used: A linear extrapolation from the previous five years of kindergarten enrollment, assuming thatthere is a trend; or, alternatively, a comparison of the kindergarten enrollmentto births from five years prior can be used to calculate a “birth-to-k” ratio. For example, kindergarten enrollmentin 2025 is divided by the total births in King County in 2020 to produce a birth-to-k ratio. The average ratio for the last five years can then be applied to births in subsequentyears to estimate kindergarten enrollment. The Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction (OSPI) uses the cohort survival method to project enrollments for purposes of the School Construction Assistance Program. The cohort survival method generally works well for Districts that have a consistent trend of gradual increases or declines in enrollment.It is less reliable in Districts where spikes in demographic trends (especially a marked increase or decrease in new housing or other enrollment factors) can lead to dramatic swings in enrollment from one yearto the next. In addition, the use of the linear extrapolation method at the kindergarten level can result in a distorted trend since it does not consider changes in birth rate trends. Combining cohort survival with other information about births, housing, regional population trends, and even trends in service area and private school enrollment can often provide for a more accurate forecast. The District contracts with FLO Analytics to prepare a modified cohort survival projection. The modified cohort survival projection combines the average rollup at existing grades with estimates of growth expected from new housing, as well as assumptions about market share gains or losses that the District is likely to see at certain grade levels. Estimates of housing growth for this model were obtained from building permit information provided by the respective jurisdictions. However, there are many unknowns due to current market concerns in real estate, inflation, and recent changes in government funding and job markets. As a result, and to be prepared for the different scenarios, the District reviews three projections: a low, medium, and high. See Appendix for recent enrollment history and projected enrollment. Projection Methodology: 10 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) || The District reviewed FLO Analytics’ low, medium, and high modified cohort survival projections to determine our enrollment forecast for 2024-2030, and chose the medium scenario as the likely enrollment forecast for this time period. All of these scenarios included a continued decline in enrollment for the District. However, the medium scenario projected an enrollment decline similar to the last five years of enrollment, with slightly less of a decline per year to accommodate the current residential developments in the pipeline for our area. The District will continue to monitor development, move-in/move-outs, and trends within the four-county area to better predict enrollment more than two years out. Table 3 below identifies projected enrollment CHANGE ACTUALOCT.| Soso HEADCOUNT CHANGE 2024 -2030 2024 -2030 (medium) -6.30% (405) 6,027 6,432 ELEMENTARY -4.80% (148) 2,938 3,086 MIDDLE -6.29% (263) 3,917 4,180 HIGH -6.06% (10) 155 165 other/alt -5.96% (826.00) 13,037 13,863 TOTAL Projections through 2030-2031: using the medium growth scenario. Table 3 — Projected Enrollment — 2024 to 2030 11 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) || |||||| ||||| |||||| |||||| ||||| ||||| V. CAPITAL FACILITIES NEEDS AND PLANNING Capacity Needs: When considering the District’s existing permanent capacity as compared to projected enrollment through the 2030-2031 school year, the District shows sufficient capacity in the near term at the elementary, middle school, and high school level. Importantly, the opening of the new Sartori Elementary School in August 2018 and Hilltop Heritage Elementary School in 2023 addressed capacity-specific needs and provides an overall increase in capacity for the elementary grade span, which were identified during 2015 & 2018 long-range planning and Citizens’ Facilities Advisory Committee sessions in preparation for our voter-approved 2016 capital levy (which provided funding to construct Sartori Elementary School) and 2019 capital bond (which provided funding to construct Hilltop Heritage Elementary School). Table 4 compares the District’s permanent capacity (from Table 2) with the six year enrollment projections by grade level (Appendix D). Anticipated capacity additions over the planning period are included in the analysis but are subject to funding and completion. Table 4 -Capacity Analysis: Surplus/Deficit Projections* (2024/25 -2030/31) [ SURPLUS / DEFICIT CAPACITY PROJECTIONS’2024/25 -2030/31 | 24/25* 25/26 | 26/27 | 27/28 28/29 | 29/30 | 30/31 | BLEW K-5 "| PROGRAM CAPACITY STUDENT ENROLLMENT SURPLUS / (DEFICIT CAPACITY) 7,449 6 940 7,449 6,352 1,097 7,449 6,273 1,176 7,449 6,210 1,239 7,449 6,076 1,373 7,449 6,044 1,405 7,449 6,027 1,422 MIDDLE 6-8 PROGRAM CAPACITY STUDENT ENROLLMENT SURPLUS / (DEFICIT CAPACITY) 3,435 3, 3,435 3,194 241 3,435 3,162 273 3,435 3,129 306 3,435 3,057 378 3,435 3,008 427 3,435 2,938 497 HIGH 9-12 PROGRAM CAPACITY? STUDENT ENROLLMENT SURPLUS / (DEFICIT CAPACITY) | 4,458 \ 4,458 4,156 302 4,458 4,012 446 4,458 3,960 498 4,669 3,989 680 4,669 3,939 730 4,669 3,917 752 medium range projection -24/25 and beyond 1. Doesnot include relocatable facilities (portables) High School capacity increases by 211 students in 2028 with Renton HS replacement2. The 2022 voter-approved capital bond provided funding for property acquisition, planning, and construction of a replacement of Renton High School. This project is expected to include added program capacity to address potential enrollment growth beyond the six-year planning period. The project is also intended to replace an aging school building and work towards program equity across the high school grade space atall District high schools. 12 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Additionally, the 2022 capital bond included a building modernization of Hazen High School, including seismic structural updates, safety/security updates, HVAC system updates,finish updates in classrooms, corridors, and the library. This project is eligible for approximately $28.6 million from OSPI — School Construction Assistance Program (SCAP) funding for a building modernization at the secondary school grade level. We are currently pursuing the SCAP funding for this project and it is the only OSPI — SCAP funding that the District is currently eligible to receive. Table 4 does not include planned capacity additions at the middle school level but there is discussion for future bond planning that includes the need to replace both Nelson Middle School and Dimmitt Middle School, based on the age and condition of the school buildings. The District will continue to monitor middle school enrollment growth to determine if additional capacity as a part of these potential projects is needed for growth. It should be noted that the District is also reaching its maximum limit in providing portable classrooms at many of its existing sites due to current land use and building code requirements. For the last six-year period, the District’s highest priorities have been to address existing and projected facility capacity deficits, aging infrastructure at secondary schools, and responding to/planning for both growth and program related added capacity. These projects funded by the 2019 bond, 2022 bond, and impact fees, are projects responding to growth. This has included: Completion of Hilltop Heritage Elementary School, helping to relieve capacity needs in e the Hazen High School service area. With the opening of Hilltop Heritage Elementary School in 2023, the District continues to have available capacity at the elementary level to serve potential enrollment growth. High school additions and/or renovations to create additional science classroom/laboratory space to address changes in State graduation requirements. e Planning for replacement of Renton High School, Dimmitt Middle School, and/or Nelson e Middle School — all aging facilities and potentially impacted by future growth. Acquisition of land for future development. e Addition and or relocation of relocatable classrooms (interim classroom space knownas e portables). Over the next six years the District will continue to implement the projects funded by the votes in the November 2022 bond. These projects include the following capacity and non-capacity projects: e Interior door hardware/lock updates e New key system Capital Construction Plan: Safety & Security 13 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Main entry video intercoms e Entryway improvements to provide front door line-of-sight for office staff e Security camera updates and new installations e e Updated fire alarm and security alarm panels, devices, and systems Update seismic and structural systems in older buildings (retrofitting e and modification of existing structures to make them more resistant to seismic activity, ground motion,or soil failure) Improvements and equipment replacement of school Heating, Ventilation, and Air e Conditioning (HVAC)systems Upgrades to electrical, plumbing, and mechanical systems e Upgrades to boilers and domestic hot water heaters e Replacement of aging roofs at school buildings e Build anew high school facility for the Renton High School service area, providing e a modern learning environment and equitable athletic opportunities for all students. The District’s intent in structuring its capital improvement program is to maintain a constant level of construction throughout the program period to optimize the utilization of its management capabilities. The District utilizes a combination of in-house project management (Capital Planning and Construction Office) and outside managementconsultants to accomplish this. School Improvements Purchase Property Provide for up to forty acres for a Renton High School replacement and the e relocation of our Nutrition Services/Warehouse facility. Build New Renton High School 14 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) VI. SIX-YEAR FINANCE PLAN Funding for planned improvements is typically secured from several sources including voter- approved bonds or capital levies, State Construction Assistance Program funding, and impact fees. Bonds are typically used to fund the construction of new schools and other capital improvement projects and require a 60% voter approval. The District’s voters in 2019 approved a $249.6 M bond measure to fund a new elementary school (Hilltop Elementary School) to accommodate enrollment needs. Sartori Elementary School opened in 2018 as a choice school, providing additional capacity relief. The voters in November 2022 approved a $676 M bond to fund property acquisition and construction of a new Renton High School and security, seismic, and building systems updates at various schools throughout the District. State School Construction Assistance funds come from the Common School Construction Fund. The State deposits revenue from the sale of renewable resources from State school lands set aside by the Enabling Act of 1889 into the Common School Account. If these sources are insufficient to meet needs, the Legislature can appropriate General Obligation Bond funds, or the Superintendent of Public Instruction can prioritize projects for funding. School districts may qualify for State School Construction Assistance Program (SCAP) funds for specific capital projects based on a prioritization system. The District anticipates receiving approximately $28 M in SCAP funding for the Hazen High School Modernization project. Where a district is eligible, impact fees are a means of supplementing traditional funding sources for the construction of public facilities needed to accommodate new development. See Section VII School Impact Fees. The primary funding sources for all capital construction projects scheduled over the next six years include 2022 Bond funds and remaining funds from the 2022 technology/capital levy. Growth driven projects funded by impact fee revenue and 2019 bond funds are nearing completion. The majority of the recent bond funds will be directed towards land acquisition and the replacement of Renton High School. Construction of this school will not begin for two years due to the need to complete land acquisition and site preparation. If enrollment projections change to show that added capacity is needed to accommodate growth at the 9-12 grade level, the District will evaluate including the high school capacity additions as a part of a future impact fee calculation. Capacity adding projects represent only a portion of the district’s total capital improvement plan. Estimated expenditures for capacity projects over the duration of this six-year plan are indicated in Table 5 below. Funding Sources: Finance Plan: 15 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) |||||||| Table 5a— Six Year Finance Plan — Added New Capacity Estimated Expenditures‘ ($1,000,000's) Funding ($1,000,000's) Project 2024-2025-2026-2027-2028-2029-2030-. 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Total Secured? Unsecured? 2 2 0New Elem. School 2 HS Science 0 0 0Classrooms 0 2 2 0Land Acquisition 2 4 4 0portables 4 0 0 0 8 8 0Total 8 0 0 0 1. Estimated expenditures based on total project cost, including hard and soft costs. 2. Secured funding includes 2022 bond monies, and previously collected school impact fees. The District did not receive SCAP funds for the capacity projects identified in Table 5a. Unsecured funds include, where relevant, future school impact fees and potential bond initiatives.3. 16 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) |||||||| Table 5b — Six Year Finance Plan -Projects not Related to Added Capacity Funding ($1,000,000's) Estimated Expenditures' ($1,000,000's) 2030-2025-2026-2027-2028- 2 0 2 9 - 2024-Project 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Total Secured? Unsecured Total 62 97 156 192 64 18 0} 589 589 0 Estimated expenditures based on total project cost, including hard and soft costs. 1. 2. Secured funding includes 2022 bond monies. Includes approximately $28.6 M in WA State OSPI -SCAP funding. 3. Renton High School Replacement & Site Expansion 36 52 102 146 55 18 409 409 0 Hazen HS Modernization? Sierra Heights Secure Entry and Admin Remodel & Seismic Updates 10 5 20 1 20 18 3 71 6 71 6 0 0 Lindbergh HS HVAC & Seismic Updates 1 2 16 20 4 43 43 0 District-wide Safety/Security Updates 2 4 4 2 12 12 0 District-wide Seismic Updates (phase 1) District-wide HVAC Updates (phase I) District-wide Building Envelope and Roof Updates (phase 1) 3 3 2 10 5 3 7 4 3 1 4 1 2 21 18 9 21 18 9 0 0 0 17 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) The GMA authorizes jurisdictions to assess and collect impact fees to supplement funding of additional public facilities needed to accommodate new development. Impact fees cannot be used for the operation, maintenance,repair, alteration, or replacement of existing capital facilities used to meet existing service demands.In the case of public schools, impact fees are assessed only on residential new development. King County and the cities of Bellevue, Newcastle, and Renton currently collect impact fees on behalf of the District. Where applicable, the District calculates its impact fees in conformance with the codes of each jurisdiction. To be eligible to collect school impact fees for new capacity projects, a district must demonstrate expected grade level enrollment growth over the six-year planning period and a related need for new capacity. The school impact fee formula examines the costs of housing new students from growthby using a student generation factor, which indicates the number of students that each type of dwelling produces based on recenthistorical data. See Appendix C for detail on the student generation rates. Other factors used to calculate school impact fees include: Site Acquisition Costs -the actual or estimated cost per acre to purchase property. Building Cost — the actual or estimated cost to construct growth related facilities. Temporary Facility Cost -the actual or estimated cost per classroom to purchase and install a relocatable classroom,including site work and utilities. State Construction Assistance Program Funding Credit -the amount of funding provided by the State, subject to District eligibility, based on a construction cost allocation and funding assistance percentage established by the State. Tax Credit — the estimated amountthat a new homeowner will pay toward the school construction bond primarily funding the capacity improvement, derived from assessed property values, taxation rate, and current bond interest rates. As required by local ordinances, the District’s fee formula incorporates a fifty (50) percent “discount rate,” which operates to set the final fee at 50% of the calculated unfunded need. Table 6 below compares the District’s current impact fee with the recommended 2026 impact fee. VU. IMPACT FEES 18 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) | CHANGE 2026 2025 IMPACT FEES SINGLE-($1,003 $0 $1,003 FAMILY ($3,268) $0 $3,268 MULTI-FAMILY Due to the current projection of no expected grade level enrollment growth at K-5, 6-8, or 9-12, The District intends to monitor the District is not eligible to collect impact fees for 2026. enrollment growth closely and will update the CFP accordingly should the District become eligible for school impact fees in the future. Table 6 — School Impact Fees Effective Proposed January January 19 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) =———=— =——— t APPENDIX A —RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT MAP CES THE™ NMS= . FE aE Remy ae kat Fees Abbreviations Renton School District Map Legend Secondary Schools: Elementary Schools: Dimmitt Middle School OMS Benson Hill Elementary BHE Hazen High School HHS Bryn Mawr Elementary BME i)Renton Ue Bellevue Lindbergh High School LHS Cascade Elementary CES McKnight Middle School MMS Campbell Hill Elementary CHE Nelsen Middle School NMS Honeydew Elementary HDE ee Seatac a Kent Renton High School RHS Hazlewood Elementary HES Risdon Middle School Hilltop Heritage Elementary RMS THS HHE Talley High School Highlands Elementary HLE . Kennydale Elementary KDEKing County ee Tukwila a Lakeridge Elementary LRE Maplewood Heights Elementary MHE i Renton Park Elementary RPE City Limits Newcastle Early Learning & Specialty: Sartori Elementary SAE of Renton Meadow Crest Sierra Heights Elementary MEC SHE Early Learning Center Talbot Hill Elementary THE KC UG —Renton Academ' RAS Park Elementa -Tiffany y TPE Boundary Eyal) ie AGENDA ITEM #2. d) |||| | ||| ||| | |||| | «|| |||| || APPENDIX B — SCHOOL CAPACITY CHARTS Appendix B: Table 1 -Elementary School Capacity FACTORS: Student/Teacher Ratios: Grades K-1 21:1 Grade 2 22:1 Grade 3 24:1 Grades 4-5 29:1 Scheduling Efficiciency 1.00 Program Efficiency 1.00 TOTALRELOCATABLE CLASSROOMSSCHOOL PERMANENT TEACHING STATIONS 2 3 45 SPED JOTHER| CAP TOTAL] K-14 2 3 45 SPED|OTHER| CAP CAPTOTAL] K-1 32 8 3 3 6 4 8 520 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 520BENSONHILL BRYN MAWR 25 7 3 5 0 1 9 338 6 0 0 0 5 0 1 145 483 25 6 2 6 0 2 9 332 8 0 0 a 5 0 0 217 549CAMPBELLHILL 4 0 0 2 96 5634 0 7 3 10 467 6 0 0CASCADE 31 7 2 6 591 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 591HAZELWOOD 32 9 4 4 7 a2 8 4 3 7 2 8 547 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 547HIGHLANDS 0 0 0 5544 6 3 5 554 0 0 0 0 0 22 7 4 4 0 i 6 336 8 0 0 0 6 0 2 174 510HILLTOP HERITAGE 30 8 4 HONEY DEW 9 3 5 8 2 6 622 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 622KENNYDALE 33 5 29 427283986 0 0 0 1 0LAKERIDGE 26 6 3 3 4 26 1 5 2 0 2 6 402 12 0 0 3 9 0 0 333 735MAPLEWOOD HGTS.} 3 A 6 2 1 476 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 476RENTON PARK 32 7 3 7 554 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 554SARTORI 32 8 4 4 6 8 4 3 4 3 7 472 8 0 0 1 3 0 4 111 583SIERRA HGTS. 29 6 { 6 460 5 0 0 2 0 { 2 60 520TALBOT HILL 26 8 3 2 4 0 0 0 3 0 1 87 46727 8 3 3 2 2 9 380TIFFANY PARK 35 121 7,449 65 0 0 13 32 1 49 1,252 8,704TOTAL 460 117 56 54 69 RELOCATABLE CLASSROOMS TOTALLINDBERGH SERVICE PERMANENT TEACHING STATIONS 2 3 45 SPED |OTHER| CAP |TOTAL| K-1 2 3 4-5 SPED|OTHER| CAP CAPAREA TOTAL] K-1 32 8 3 3 6 4 8 520 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 520BENSONHILL 0 7 3 10 467 6 0 0 4 0 0 2 %6 563CASCADE 31 7 4 0 0 47647600 0 0 0 0RENTONPARK 32 7 3 3 2 1 8 3 3 2 2 9 380 4 0 0 0 3 0 1 87 467TIFFANY PARK 27 10 0 0 4 3 0 3 183 2,026122 30 13 9 21 11 38 1,843TOTAL TOTALRELOCATABLE CLASSROOMSHAZEN PERMANENT TEACHING STATIONS 3 45 SPED |OTHER| CAP TOTAL] K-1 2 3 4-5 SPED|OTHER| CAP CAPSERVICE AREA TOTAL] K-1 2 9 4 4 7 2 6 591 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 591HAZELWOOD 32 0 554355540 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 it 4 4 0 1 6 336 HILLTOP HERITAGE 30 8 4 4 6 8 0 0 0 6 0 2 174 510HONEY DEW 3 5 8 2 6 622 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 622KENNYDALE 33 9 26 1 5 2 0 2 6 402 12 0 0 3 9 0 0 333 735MAPLEWOOD HGTS.}| 8 4 3 4 3 7 472 8 0 0 { 3 0 4 111 583SIERRA HGTS. 29 30 0 0 4 18 0 8 618 3,595172 44 24 2 25 13 36 2,977TOTAL TOTALRELOCATABLE CLASSROOMS CAP TOTAL} K-1 2 3 45 SPED|OTHER| CAP CAPRENTON HIGH PERMANENT TEACHING STATIONS SPED|OTHER| BRYN MAWR 25 7 3 5 0 1 9 338 6 0 0 0 5 0 {145 483 25 6 2 6 0 2 9 332 SERVICE AREA TOTAL] K-1 2 3 45 8 0 0 3 5 0 0 217 549CAMPBELL HILL 0 0 0 0 0 54737285470 0 0HIGHLANDS 32 8 4 29 427283986 0 0 0 1 0 5LAKERIDGE 26 6 3 3 4 8 3 2 6 1 6 460 5 0 0 2 0 ¢ 2 60 520TALBOT HILL 26 451 2,5268 40 2,075 25 0 0 .1 1 8TOTAL 134 35 15 19 17 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Appendix B: Table 2 -Middle School Capacity Appendix B: Table 3 -High School Capacity (24:1 @ Talley) Core Classes 29:1 PE 40:1 Band /Orchestra 40:1 Choir 50:1 SPED 12:1 Other 31:1 (24:1 @ Talley) Scheduling Efficiciency 0.80 Program Efficiency 0.90 FACTORS: Student/Teacher Ratios: Core Classes 29:1 PE 35:1 Band /Orchestra 40:1 Choir 50:1 SPED 12:1 Other 31:1 Scheduling Efficiency 0.83 Program Efficiency 0.95 SCHOOL FACTORS: Student/Teacher Ratios: SCHOOL AGENDA ITEM #2. d) J|||||| |||||]|||||||]||| ff||||| | |}||||| |||ff||| || || | SGRs I Students Housing Housing Type K-12 9-12 6-8 K-12 || K-5 9-12 6-8 «-5 Units 0.219 0.065 0.045 0.108 121 36 25 60 553 Single-family 0.214 0.046 0.038 0.131 108 23 19 66 505 Multifamily 0.213 0.043 0.037 |] 0.133 80 16 14 50 376 AptiPlex 0.217 0.054 0.039 jf 0.124 28 7 5 16 129 Townhome Notes APPENDIX C — STUDENT GENERATION RATES (SGR) The formula for determining school impact fees, as established by King County Council Ordinance 11621, requires that school districts provide “student factors based on district records of average actual student generation rates for new developments constructed over a period of not more than five years prior to the date of the fee calculation.” The Ordinance also provides that, in the event this information is not available in the District, “data from adjacent districts, districts with similar demographics, or county-wide averages must be used.” Appendix C: Table 1 -Student Generation Rates by Housing Subcategory (2025) Units built in 2024 are excluded, because they may not have been completed and occupied by October 2024, King County code Title 214.43 defines the housing types as such, “single family units shall mean single detached dwelling units, and multi-family units shail mean townhouses and apartments.” (a) The multifamily category represents all structures with five or more housing units, including the following structure types: apartment, townhome,and plex (i.e., duplex,triplex, and fourplex}. (b) The multifamily Apt/Plex subcategory includes the following structure types: apartment and plex. Sources Renton School District October 2024-25 headcount enrollment. King County GIS parcels and King County Department of Assessments assessor information. Appendix C: Table 2 -Student Generation Rates for Projects with 25+ Housing Units (2019-2023) Housing Type Project Name YearBuilt 1 Bed| 2 Bed| 3 Bed 4 Bed| 5 Bed Units K-5 Students 6-8 9-12] K-12] K-5 SGRs 6-8 9-12 K-12 Apt/Plex Leonard Place} 2019 23 21| 5 o 0 4a 12 3 0 15 ]]0.250} 0.063] 0.000] 0.313 Apt/Plex Oaks 2021 4a] 12} 0] 04 0 60 5 2 3 10 |]0.083]0.033] 0.050] 0.167 Apt/Plex Tenace 2021 73 o o wos 2 1 4 |10.019] 0.009} 0.009 | 0.037 Apt/Plex 2022 32 0 145 0.186] 0.041 0.069] 0.297 Townhome Village 2019 60 0.100 0.033] 0.067 0.200 Farms No. 06 ~ f=. f-P= --32 0,156] 0.063] 0.031 0.250 At Tiffany Park ~f.f->= |. -95 0.074] 0.021} 0.042] 0.137 Terrace ~-= -= 7 -5s? 0.102] 0.051 0.136 0.288 Lake Wash Of Eden ~ ~ ~ ~ -~ 34 0.118] 0.088} 0.059 0.265 Notes Only developments wilh 25 or more unils included. Units built in 2024 are excluded, because they may not have been completed and occupied by October 2024. King County code Title 21A.43 defines the housing types as such, “single family units shall mean single detached dwelling units, and multi-family units shall mean townhouses and apartments.” {a} The multifamily Apt/Plex subcategory includes the following structure types: apartment, and plex (i.e., duptex,triplex. and fourplex). Sources Renton SchoolDistrict October 2024-25 headcount enrollment, King County GIS parcels and King County Department of Assessments assessor information. AGENDA ITEM #2. d) ° Permitted Units 2019-2023 Units in the Pipeline Appendix C: Table 3 -Past & Future Housing Development 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 mi MF 706 5,590 @SF 470 136 Source City of Renton, Planning Division. Prepared by special request, April 11, 2025. Appendix C:Table 4 — Residential Development Details ID Jurisdiction Name Units Notes RI of Renton Renton MF 3,458 TBD R_2 of Renton 800 Renton MF 1,179 1(419 under construction soon R3 of Renton Triton Towers MF 900 TBD R_4 of Renton Solera MF 651 i 2025; 277 affordable units Red) of Renton MF 385 R_6 of Renton 6 MF R7 of Renton Solera Townhomes MF 90 R of Renton Camellia Court MF 72 for 2025 R9 of Renton Grant Place Townhomes MF 36 R_10 of Renton 4th Dimension MF 26 R11 of Renton Towns on 12th SF 90 has not started R 12 of Renton Lakeview Terrace SF 55 R 13 of Renton SF 21 R 14 of Renton Willowcrest Il SF 19 R 15 of Renton Christelle SF 19 recorded R 16 of Renton SF 18 R 17 of Renton Jefferson SF 13 R 18 of Renton VEK on Aberdeen SF 12 R 19 of Renton Emerald SF 10 na Oo SF 15 Total SF 272 Total MF 902 Total Units 7AT4 Notes King County code Tille 21A.43 defines the housing lypes as such, “single family units shall mean single detached dwelling units, and mulli-family units shall mean townhouses and apartments.” SF is single-family and MF is multifamily, which representsall structures with five or more housing units, including the following structure types: opariment, townhome,and plex{i.e., duplex, triplex, and fourplex). Sources City of Renton and King County. AGENDA ITEM #2. d) APPENDIX D —-ENROLLMENT HISTORY AND PROJECTIONS Appendix D: Table 4 -Historical Enrollment by Grade 2018-19 Grade 2018-19] 2019-20] 2020-21 2021-22} 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 to 2024-25 K 1,263 1.097 1,116 1,097 1,022 | | -255 | 1,248 1,213 1,099 1,124 1111 F-| -238 2 1,208 1.216 181 1,099 | -153 3 1,225 1.142 176 116b | -187 4 1,256 1,186 106 1,162 1,172 | -257 5 1,286 1,204 137 |. | 1,137 -140 6 1,236 113 1,052 | : “141 7 1,175 145 1,117 1,043 8 1,125 1,167 1,131 1,078 9 L118 1,123 127 1,110 ‘| 1,131 1,109 106 1,164 iW | 992 973 1,017 1,021 12 980 971 969 1,006 K-12 Total 15,172 14,918 14,433 14,383 14,125 Notes Students enrolled in Running Start full time are excluded from analysis. The lowest and highest enrollment values per grade are highlighted blue and orange,respectively. Sources Renton School District October 2018-19 to 2024-25 headcount enrollment. 2 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) ||| | ff= 2030-31 Grade 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 , 70 oe | . kK 30 1 2 3 4 5 b 7 8 9 os —-1,03 1,0581114 10 | 946 ; 872. s1072 1 | 892 910 : _ 9a 944 dP 2 6,027 6,044 6,076 6,210 6,273 6,352 6,509 K-5 2,938 3,008 3,057 3,127 3,162 3,194 3,143 6-8 3217 3.239 3.289 3.260 4012 4156 A201 212 12,882 12,991 13,122, 13,299 13,447 13,702 13,853 K-12 Appendix D: Table 2 -Enrollment Forecasts by Individual Grade -Middle Scenario Notes Students enrolled full-time in Running Start are excluded from analysis. Darker shading represents higher values and lighter shading represents lower values. Sources Renton School District October 2024-25 headcount enrollment and FLO 2025-26 to 2030-3] enrollment forecasts (middie scenario). AGENDA ITEM #2. d) APPENDIX E —-IMPACT FEE CALCULATION Due to the current projection of no expected grade level enrollment growth at K-5, 6-8, or 9- 12, the District is not eligible to collect impact fees for 2026. AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Exhibit E AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan 2024-2025 through 2030-2031 June 2025 Kent School District No. 415 12033 SE 256th Street Kent, Washington 98030-6643 (253) 373-7526 BOARD of DIRECTORS Ms. Meghin Margel, President Mr. Donald Cook, Vice President Mr. Tim Clark, Legislative Representative Mr. Andy Song, Director Ms. Teresa Gregory, Director ADMINISTRATION Israel Vela Superintendent of Schools Dr. Wade Barringer, Deputy Superintendent Dave Bussard, Executive Director Operations Raul Parungao, Executive Director of Finance Gordon Cook, Director of Facilities Brett Scribner, Assistant Director Capital Projects AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table of Contents I - Executive Summary ................................................................................................. 1 II - Six - Year Enrollment Projection ............................................................................. 4 III - Current Kent School District “Standard of Service" ................................................. 7 Current Standards of Service for Elementary Students ................................................... 7 Current District Standards of Service for Secondary Students ........................................ 8 IV - Inventory and Capacity of Existing Schools ............................................................ 9 V - Six-Year Planning and Construction Plan .............................................................. 14 VI - Portable Classrooms ........................................................................................... 21 VII - Projected Six-Year Classroom Capacity ............................................................... 25 VIII - Finance Plan ..................................................................................................... 30 IX - Summary of Changes to June 2024 Capital Facilities Plan ..................................... 34 X - Appendices .......................................................................................................... 35 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) I - Executive Summary This Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan has been prepared by the Kent School District as the organization's capital facilities planning document, in compliance with the requirements of Washington's Growth Management Act, King County Code K.C.C. 21A.43 and Cities of Kent, Covington, Renton, Auburn, Black Diamond, Maple Valley, and SeaTac. This annual Plan update was prepared using data available in the spring of 2025 for the 2024-2025 school year. This annual update of the Plan reflects no new major capital projects. This Plan is consistent with prior long-term capital facilities plans adopted by the Kent School District. This Plan is not intended to be the sole planning document for all the District's needs. The District may prepare interim and periodic Long-Range Capital Facilities Plans consistent with Board Policies, considering a longer or shorter period, other factors and trends in the use of facilities, and other needs of the District as may be required. Prior Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent School District have been adopted by Metropolitan King County Council and Cities of Kent, Covington, Auburn, and Renton and included in the Capital Facilities Plan element of the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction. This Plan has also been submitted to the cities of Black Diamond, Maple Valley, and SeaTac for their information and inclusion in their Comprehensive Plans. In order for impact fees to be collected in the unincorporated areas of Kent School District, the Metropolitan King County Council must adopt this Plan and a fee- implementing ordinance for the District. For impact fees to be collected in the incorporated portions of the District, the cities of Kent, Covington, Renton and Auburn must also adopt this Plan and their own school impact fee ordinances. This Capital Facilities Plan establishes a standard of service in order to ascertain current and future capacity. While the State Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, those guidelines do not account for local program needs in the District. The Growth Management Act, King County and City codes and ordinances authorize the District to make adjustments to the standard of service based on specific needs for students of the District. This Plan includes the standard of service as established by Kent School District. Functional capacity is based on an average capacity and updated to reflect changes to special programs served in each building. Portables in the interim capacity calculation use the same standard of service as the permanent facilities. 1 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) The capacity of each school in the District is calculated based on the District’s standard of service and the existing inventory of permanent facilities. The District's program capacity of permanent facilities reflects program changes and the state’s mandated reduction of class size to meet the standard of service for Kent School District. Portables provide additional interim capacity. Kent School District is the fifth largest (FTE basis) district in the state. Enrollment is electronically reported monthly to the Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction (“OSPI”) on Form P-223. Although funding apportionment is based on Annual Average Full Time Equivalent (AAFTE), enrollment on October 1 is a widely recognized “snapshot in time” that is used to report the District’s enrollment for the year as reported to OSPI (See Table 1). The District's standard of service, enrollment history and projections, and use of interim facilities are reviewed in detail in various sections of this Plan. The District plans to continue to satisfy concurrency requirements through the interim use of portables. This Plan currently represents projects in progress funded primarily by the Kent School District’s 2016 Bond, the 2018 Capital Levy, and our newly passed 2024 Capital and Tech Levy. Additional information about these projects can be found on the District’s capital projects homepage (link). Additionally, project updates sent to our community of stakeholders can be accessed on the KSD website (link). Based on revised student generation rates, our capacity and enrollment projections, the District will stay current with non-collection of student impact fee rate for the coming year. For a short overview, see Section IX (Summary of Changes to the June 2025 Capital Facilities Plan). 2 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Description/Year 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 King County Live Births 24,630 25,032 24,910 25,348 25,487 26,011 25,274 24,337 24,090 23,638 Increase/(Decrease)402 (122)438 139 524 (737)(937)(247)(452) Kindergarten/Birth (%)8.3%8.0%8.2%7.8%7.9%6.5%7.3%7.7%7.3%7.7% Source: https://doh.wa.gov/data-and-statistical-reports/washington-tracking-network-wtn/county-all-births-dashboard Grade/Fiscal Year 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 K 2,045 2,013 2,037 1,989 2,010 1,703 1,836 1,874 1,761 1,811 1 2,131 2,067 2,056 2,061 2,036 1,882 1,768 1,945 1,931 1,793 2 2,163 2,163 2,077 2,008 2,091 1,980 1,818 1,840 1,965 1,958 3 2,176 2,195 2,143 2,043 1,995 2,001 1,938 1,887 1,878 1,970 4 2,089 2,195 2,218 2,118 2,038 1,912 1,924 1,953 1,924 1,945 5 1,958 2,103 2,189 2,170 2,120 1,937 1,872 1,953 1,973 1,924 6 2,058 1,952 2,119 2,184 2,164 2,024 1,893 1,962 1,948 1,928 7 1,974 2,021 1,922 2,044 2,166 2,010 1,925 1,906 1,949 1,951 8 2,100 2,021 2,043 1,882 2,073 2,086 1,937 1,956 1,922 1,936 9 2,093 2,105 2,006 2,003 1,888 2,001 2,042 2,010 1,955 1,922 10 2,165 2,099 2,080 1,946 2,034 1,811 1,959 2,048 2,000 1,947 11 1,818 1,865 1,823 1,732 1,663 1,743 1,584 1,679 1,729 1,782 12 1,742 1,730 1,810 1,653 1,634 1,453 1,655 1,467 1,500 1,565 Total Enrollment 26,512 26,529 26,523 25,833 25,912 24,543 24,151 24,480 24,435 24,432 Yearly Increase/ (Decrease)(211)17 (6)(690)79 (1,369)(392)329 (45)(3) Cumulative Increase/ (Decrease)(211)(194)(200)(890)(811)(2,180)(2,572)(2,243)(2,288)(2,291) Source: https://ospi.k12.wa.us/policy-funding/school-apportionment/safs-report (1251H Headcount.pdf) King County Live Births Enrollment KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 ENROLLMENT HISTORY 26,512 26,529 26,523 25,833 25,912 24,543 24,151 24,480 24,435 24,432 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 Enrollment TABLE 1 3 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) II - Six - Year Enrollment Projection For capital facilities planning, enrollment projections are based on cohort survival and student yield from documented residential construction projected over the next six years (See Table 2). For this Plan, the District used data from OSPI Information and Condition of Schools (ICOS), Report 1049. King County live births and the District's relational percentage average were used to determine the number of kindergartners entering the system (See Table 2). 7.5% of 23,390 King County live births in 2021 is projected for 1,755 students expected in Kindergarten for October 1, 2025. This is a decrease of 248 live births in King County over the previous year. The District’s enrollment from 2025-26 to 2030-31 is projected to decrease by an average of 1.5% each year or a total of 2,089 students. The projected enrollment for 2030-31 is 22,343. Early Childhood Education students (also identified as “ECE”), “Early Childhood Special Education (“ECSE”) students are forecasted and reported to OSPI separately on Form P-223H for Special Education Enrollment. Capacity is reserved to serve students in the ECE programs at elementary schools. Within practical limits, the District has kept abreast of proposed developments. The District will continue to track new development activity to determine impact on schools. Information on new residential developments and the completion of these proposed developments in all jurisdictions will be considered in the District's future analysis of growth projections. The Kent School District serves eight permitting jurisdictions: unincorporated King County, the cities of Kent, Covington, Renton, and Auburn and smaller portions of the cities of SeaTac, Black Diamond, and Maple Valley. 4 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) STUDENT GENERATION FACTOR "Student Generation Factor" is defined by King County code as "the number derived by a school district to describe how many students of each grade span are expected to be generated by a dwelling unit" based on district records of average actual student generated rates for developments completed within the last ten years. Following these guidelines, the student generation rate for Kent School District is as follows: Single Family Elementary 0.222 Middle 0.092 High 0.116 Total 0.430 Multi-Family Elementary 0.075 Middle 0.030 High 0.032 Total 0.137 The student generation factor is based on 1,927 new SFD (Single Family Detached) units built between 2018 and 2023. The student generation factor is based on 1,908 new MF (Multi- Family) units built during the same period. The multi-family units consisted of 1,590 apartment units and 318 townhome units. The District sees an average of 43 students for every 100 single family units that are built and an average of 14 students for every 100 multi-family units that are built. The rate for apartment units is higher than for townhome units. The rate for apartments can vary, depending on the affordability of the units and the number of bedrooms per unit for specific buildings. Many of the apartment units built between 2018 and 2023 have market rate rents and they tend to have fewer bedrooms per unit than some of the buildings that were completed in 2016 and 2017. The multi-family rate is lower this year than it was in March 2024 because the date range used in the analysis includes fewer affordable units and fewer multiple bedroom units. In preparing the 2024-2025 to 2030-2031 Capital Facilities Plan the District contracted with Educational Data Solutions, LLC led by Dr. Les Kendrick, a noted expert in demographic studies for school districts, to analyze and prepare the student generation factor. 5 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Description/Year 2021 2022 2023 2024 (Proj) 2025 (Proj) 2026 (Proj) King County Live Births 23,390 23,012 22,408 22,236 22,065 21,896 Increase/(Decrease)(248)(378)(604)(172)(171)(169) Kindergarten/Birth (%)7.5%7.5%7.6%7.6%7.5%7.5% Grade/Fiscal Year 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31 K 1,755 1,732 1,710 1,687 1,665 1,643 1 1,841 1,784 1,760 1,738 1,714 1,692 2 1,794 1,842 1,785 1,761 1,739 1,715 3 1,956 1,793 1,841 1,784 1,760 1,738 4 1,963 1,949 1,787 1,834 1,778 1,754 5 1,928 1,946 1,932 1,771 1,818 1,762 6 1,906 1,910 1,928 1,914 1,755 1,801 7 1,882 1,861 1,865 1,882 1,868 1,713 8 1,929 1,861 1,840 1,844 1,861 1,847 9 1,930 1,924 1,856 1,835 1,839 1,856 10 1,895 1,902 1,896 1,829 1,808 1,812 11 1,684 1,639 1,645 1,639 1,582 1,563 12 1,631 1,540 1,499 1,504 1,499 1,447 Total Enrollment 24,094 23,683 23,344 23,022 22,686 22,343 Yearly Increase/ (Decrease)(338)(411)(339)(322)(336)(343) Cumulative Increase/ (Decrease)(338)(749)(1,088)(1,410)(1,746)(2,089) Source: School Facilities Organization, Information and Condition of Schools (Report 1049) KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 ENROLLMENT PROJECTION King County Live Births Enrollment Projection Source: https://doh.wa.gov/data-and-statistical-reports/washington-tracking-network-wtn/county-all-births- dashboard TABLE 2 6 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) III - Current Kent School District “Standard of Service" In order to determine the capacity of facilities in a school district, King County Code 21A.06.1225 references a "standard of service" that each school district must establish to ascertain its overall capacity. The standard of service identifies the program year, the class size, the number of classrooms, students and programs of special need, and other factors determined by the district which would best serve the student population. This Plan includes the standard of service as established by Kent School District. The District has identified schools with significant special needs programs as “impact” schools and the standard of service targets a lower-class size at those facilities. Portables included in the capacity calculation use the same standard of service as the permanent facilities. The standard of service defined herein will continue to evolve in the future. Kent School District is continuing a long-term strategic planning process combined with review of changes to capacity and standard of service. This process will affect various aspects of the District's standard of service and future changes will be reflected in future capital facilities plans. Current Standards of Service for Elementary Students •Class size ratio for grades K - 3 is planned for an average of 24 students per class, not to exceed 26. •Class size ratio for grades 4 - 5 is planned for an average of 27 students per class, not to exceed 29. Some special programs require specialized classroom space and the program capacity of some of the buildings housing these programs is reduced. Some students, for example, leave their regular classroom for a short period of time to receive instruction in special programs and space must be allocated to serve these programs. Students may also be provided with music instruction and physical education in a separate classroom or facility. Some identified students will also be provided educational opportunities in classrooms for special programs such as those designated as follows: Career and Technical Education (CTE) – State Program Closing Educational Achievement Gaps (Title I – Part A) - Federal Program Highly Capable Students (HiCap) - State Program 7 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Learning Assistance Program (LAP) – State Program Multilingual Education (MLE) - State Program Inclusive Education Service for Elementary and Secondary students with disabilities may be provided in a separate or self-contained classroom sometimes with a capacity of 10-15 students, depending on the program. Current District Standards of Service for Secondary Students The standards of service outlined below reflect only those programs and educational opportunities provided to secondary students which directly affect the capacity of the school buildings per the negotiated collective bargaining agreement with KEA. •The average class size ratio for grades 6–8 is 28 students per class and 135 students per day, with a maximum daily class load/enrollment of 142 based on five class periods per day. •The average class size ratio for grades 9-12 is 32 students per class and 153 students per day, with a maximum daily class load/enrollment of 160 based on five class periods per day. Like Inclusive Education Programs listed above, many other secondary programs require specialized classroom space which can reduce the functional capacity of the permanent school buildings, such as technology labs, performing arts activities, a variety of career and technical education programs, and other specialized programs. Space or Classroom Utilization As a result of scheduling conflicts for student programs, the need for specialized rooms for certain programs, and the need for teachers to have a workspace during their planning periods, it is not possible to achieve 100% utilization of regular teaching stations at secondary schools. Based on the analysis of actual utilization of classrooms, the Kent School District has determined that the standard utilization rate is 64% for secondary schools. Functional capacity at elementary schools reflects 56% utilization at the elementary level. 8 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) IV - Inventory and Capacity of Existing Schools Currently, the District has a total functional capacity to house 39,705 students, which consists of a permanent functional capacity of 35,494 and interim (portable) capacity of 4,211. This capacity is based on the District's Standard of Service as set forth in Section III. Included in this Plan is an inventory of the District's schools by type, address and current capacity (See Table 3). The ratio between permanent capacity and portable capacity is 89% - 11%. The functional capacity is periodically updated for changes in the programs, additional classrooms, and new schools. Functional capacity has been updated in this Plan to reflect program changes implemented in the fall of 2024. Calculations of Elementary, Middle School and High School capacities are set forth in Table 3. Maps of existing schools are included. For clarification, the following is a brief description of some of the non-traditional programs for students in Kent School District: iGrad - Kent School District has developed the Individualized Graduation and Degree Program or “iGrad”. iGrad is an Open Door (Drop-out Reengagement) School that offers a second plus chance to students aged 16-21 who have dropped out of high school or are at risk of not earning a high school diploma by age 21. iGrad is not included in this Capital Facilities Plan, because it is served as a leased space at the Kent Hill Plaza Shopping Center. Over the past three years, enrollment in the iGrad program has averaged over 340 students. Kent Virtual Academy - The Kent Virtual Academy is open to grades 6-12 and is currently serving 167 students. The virtual school offers a flexible learning experience designed to engage students when and where they work best. Each school day includes a combination of live (synchronous) virtual instruction and on-demand (asynchronous) learning opportunities outside of a traditional bell schedule. Students can attend live virtual lessons with their teachers and classmates, participate in live virtual class or small group discussions, check-in or meet with teachers, watch recorded video lessons, work independently on projects and lessons, participate in learning experiences outside the school setting for credit or to meet competencies. Virtual school students may also attend their boundary school for select classes and services. 9 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Year Opened Carriage Crest Elementary 1990 CC 18235 - 140th Avenue SE, Renton 98058 626 Cedar Valley Elementary 1971 CV 26500 Timberlane Way SE, Covington 98042 541 Covington Elementary 2018 CO 25811 156th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 744 Crestwood Elementary 1980 CW 25225 - 180th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 602 1953 EH 9825 S 240th Street, Kent 98031 779 1999 EP 11800 SE 216th Street, Kent 98031 653 1969 FW 16600 - 148th Avenue SE, Renton 98058 528 East Hill Elementary Emerald Park Elementary Fairwood Elementary George T. Daniel Elementary 1992 DE 11310 SE 248th Street, Kent 98030 640 Glenridge Elementary 1996 GR 19405 - 120th Avenue SE, Renton 98058 591 Grass Lake Elementary 1971 GL 28700 - 191st Place SE, Kent 98042 595 Horizon Elementary 1990 HE 27641 - 144th Avenue SE, Kent 98042 634 Jenkins Creek Elementary 1987 JC 26915 - 186th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 641 Kent Elementary 1999 KE 24700 - 64th Avenue South, Kent 98032 760 Lake Youngs Elementary 1965 LY 19660 - 142nd Avenue SE, Kent 98042 725 Martin Sortun Elementary 1987 MS 12711 SE 248th Street, Kent 98030 768 Meadow Ridge Elementary 1994 MR 27710 - 108th Avenue SE, Kent 98030 706 Meridian Elementary 1939 ME 25621 - 140th Avenue SE, Kent 98042 793 Millennium Elementary 2000 ML 11919 SE 270th Street, Kent 98030 688 Neely-O'Brien Elementary 1990 NO 6300 South 236th Street, Kent 98032 864 Panther Lake Elementary 2009 PL 12022 SE 216th Street, Kent, 98031 744 1963 PO 11010 SE 232nd Street, Kent 98031 728 1967 PT 27825 - 118th Avenue SE, Kent 98030 732 1987 RW 18030 - 162nd Place SE, Renton 98058 661 2021 RR 22420 Military Rd. S., SeaTac, WA 98198 886 Park Orchard Elementary Pine Tree Elementary Ridgewood Elementary River Ridge Elementary Sawyer Woods Elementary 1994 SW 31135 - 228th Ave SE, Black Diamond 98010 549 1960 SH 837 1971 SC 591 1969 SB 730 1992 SR 719 20,055 1966 CR 1,110 1993 CH 1,140 1981 MA 1,020 1970 MK 1,230 1958 MM 1,110 2005 MC 1,200 Scenic Hill Elementary Soos Creek Elementary Springbrook Elementary Sunrise Elementary Elementary TOTAL 1996 NW 1,140 7,950 1951 KM 2,595 1997 KL 2,714 1968 KR 2,932 1981 KW 2,917 11,158 2021 KLA 542 Canyon Ridge Middle Cedar Heights Middle Mattson Middle Meeker Middle Meridian Middle Mill Creek Middle Northwood Middle Middle TOTAL Kent-Meridian High Kentlake High Kentridge High Kentwood High High TOTAL Kent Laboratory Academy DISTRICT TOTAL 39,705 2024-2025 Functional SCHOOL ABR ADDRESS 26025 Woodland Way South, Kent 98030 12651 SE 218th Place, Kent 98031 20035 - 100th Avenue SE, Kent 98031 22300 - 132nd Avenue SE, Kent 98042 11000 SE 264th Street, Kent 98030 19640 SE 272nd Street, Covington 98042 16400 SE 251st Street, Covington 98042 12600 SE 192nd Street, Renton 98058 23480 - 120th Avenue SE, Kent 98031 620 North Central Avenue, Kent 98032 17007 SE 184th Street, Renton 98058 10020 SE 256th Street, Kent 98030 21401 SE 300th Street, Kent 98042 12430 SE 208th Street, Kent 98031 25800 - 164th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 105 SE 208th St., Kent, WA 98031 Table 3 10 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Kent-Meridian High School Kentlake High School Kentridge High School Kentwood High School King County, WA State Parks GIS, Esri, HERE, Garmin, SafeGraph, METI/NASA, USGS, Bureau of Land Management, EPA, NPS, USDA Kent School District 2024/2025 School Year High School Boundaries Legend High School Buildings Kent-Meridian High School Kentlake High School Kentridge High School Kentwood High School ± 0 4 82 Miles 11 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Cedar Heights Mattson Meeker MeridianMill Creek Northwood Canyon Ridge King County, WA State Parks GIS, Esri, HERE, Garmin, SafeGraph, METI/NASA, USGS, Bureau of Land Management, EPA, NPS, USDA Middle Schools Cedar Heights Middle School Canyon Ridge Middle School Mattson Middle School Meeker Middle School Meridian Middle School Mill Creek Middle School Northwood Middle School Kent School District 2024/2025 School Year Middle School Boundaries 0 3.75 7.51.88 Miles Ü 12 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Carriage Crest Cedar ValleyCovington Crestwood East Hill Emerald Park Fairwood George T. Daniel Glenridge Grass Lake Horizon Jenkins Creek Kent Lake Youngs Martin Sortun Meadow Ridge Meridian Millennium Neely O Brien Panther Lake Park Orchard Pine Tree Ridgewood Sawyer Woods Scenic Hill Soos Creek Springbrook Sunrise River Ridge King County, WA State Parks GIS, Esri, HERE, Garmin, SafeGraph, METI/NASA, USGS, Bureau of Land Management, EPA, NPS, USDA Carriage Crest Elementary Cedar Valley Elementary Covington Elementary Crestwood Elementary Daniel Elementary East Hill Elementary Emerald Park Elementary Fairwood Elementary Glenridge Elementary Grass Lake Elementary Horizon Elementary Jenkins Creek Elementary Kent Elementary Lake Youngs Elementary Martin Sortun Elementary Meadow Ridge Elementary Meridian Elementary Millennium Elementary Neely O Brien Elementary Panther Lake Elementary Park Orchard Elementary Pine Tree Elementary Ridgewood Elementary River Ridge Elementary Sawyer Woods Elementary Scenic Hill Elementary Soos Creek Elementary Springbrook Elementary Sunrise Elementary Elementary Schools Kent School District 2024/2025 School Year Elementary School Boundaries 0 3.75 7.51.88 Miles Ü 13 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) V - Six-Year Planning and Construction Plan In November 2016, the voters of the Kent School District approved a bond measure for $252 million. This bonding authority provided for the replacement of Covington Elementary school, which opened in August of 2018, the new River Ridge Elementary school, and our new Kent Laboratory Academy, which both opened in August 2021. As a critical component of capital facilities planning, county and city planners and decision- makers are encouraged to consider safe walking conditions for all students when reviewing applications and design plans for new roads and developments. This should include sidewalks for pedestrian safety to and from schools and bus stops, as well as bus pull-outs and turn- arounds. Included in this Plan is an inventory of potential projects and sites identified by the District which are potentially acceptable site alternatives in the future (See Table 4 & Sitemap). Voter approved bond issues have included funding for the purchase of sites for future schools and district use; the sites acquired to date are included in this Plan. Some funding is secured for the purchase of additional sites but may also be funded with impact fees as needed. Not all undeveloped properties meet current school construction requirements, and some property may be traded or sold to meet future facility needs. The Board will continue an annual review of standards of service and those decisions will be reflected in each update of the Capital Facilities Plan. The Kent School District continues to make improvements to the facilities through completion of the 2016 Bond, 2018 Levy, and the recent voter approved 2024 Levy. At this moment the standing of the current measures are as follows: Measure Complete In Progress Not Started 2016 Bond 85% 13% 2% 2018 Levy 72% 13% 15% 2024 Levy 0% 14% 86% The Kent School District anticipates and is planning to run a Bond in 2028 for additional emergent needs, differed maintenance, tenant improvement projects, and possible facility replacement. As a part of the planning process, the District has been tracking a few major development projects which have affected enrollment and will continue to increase students' forecasts. On Meeker Street in Kent, we have seen several major apartment complexes, ETHOS and Midtown 64 Apartments. These continue to have an impact on enrollment as they fill up their newly built facilities. The Alexian Gateway Project is located on the corner of Military Road 14 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) and Veterans Drive in Kent and began occupying its 283 units in 2023-2024. In Covington, we are tracking a multi-family house development which has been approved and construction has begun. The 1700-unit Lakepointe Urban Community will fall within our enrollment boundary and proposed completion of Phase 4 is shown to be 2027. Construction in the Kent School District boundaries have been steadily rising over the last five years and planned communities are now being recognized through the planning teams in multiple city and county jurisdictions we serve. 15 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 Site Acquisitions and Projects Planned to Provide Additional Capacity Projected Projected % for SCHOOL / FACILITY / SITE LOCATION Type Status Completion Program new Date Capacity Growth Approximate Approximate # on Map ELEMENTARY MIDDLE & HIGH TEMPORARY FACILITIES Additional Capacity # on Map 2 OTHER SITES ACQUIRED Land Use Designation Type 16 White House - Kent 11027 SE Kent-Kangley Kent, WA 98030 Commercial Purchased 16a Green Building - Kent 11109 SE Kent-Kangley Kent, WA 98030 Commercial Purchased Notes: None King County Land Use Jurisdiction King County Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 4 May 2022 16 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) © copyright KROLL MAP COMPANY, INC. This map has been modified by KSD 05/22 Sawyer Woods Elementary Jenkins Creek Elementary Fairwood Elementary Ridgewood Elementary Northwood Middle School Lake Youngs Elementary Glenridge Elementary Kentridge High School Springbrook Elementary Soos Creek Elementary Sunrise Elementary Meridian Middle School Kentwood High School Park Orchard Elementary Martin Sortun Elementary Daniel Elementary East Hill Elementary Mill Creek Middle School Kent Elementary Kent-Meridian High School Scenic Hill Elementary Kent School District Administration Center Meadow Ridge Elementary Pine Tree Elementary Horizon Elementary Covington Elementary Cedar Heights Middle School Cedar Valley Elementary Crestwood Elementary Mattson Middle School Kentlake High School Neely O’Brien Elementary Carriage Crest Elementary MeridianElementary Meeker Middle School Grass Lake Elementary Emerald Park Elementary Millennium Elementary iGrad Kent Valley Early Learning Center The Outreach Program (TOP) Panther Lake Elementary River Ridge Elementary Kent Laboratory Academy 17 AG E N D A I T E M # 2 . d ) cccc cc ccc cc c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c V E T E R A N S D R I V E O L D M I L I T A R Y R O A D S O U T H AMENITY SPACE TRASH ENCLOSURES TRASH ENCLOSURES TRASH ENCLOSURES TRASH ENCLOSURES TRASH ENCLOSURES 2 1 0 1 2 2 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 4 0 1 2 1 0 4 2 2 0 4 2 3 0 4 2 4 0 4 2 1 0 5 2 2 0 5 2 3 0 5 2 4 0 5 2 1 0 8 2 2 0 8 2 3 0 8 2 4 0 8 2 1 0 9 2 2 0 9 2 3 0 9 2 4 0 9 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 2 3 1 2 2 4 1 2 2 1 1 3 2 2 1 3 2 3 1 3 2 4 1 3 2 1 1 6 2 2 1 6 2 3 1 6 2 4 1 6 2 1 0 2 2 2 0 2 2 3 0 2 2 4 0 2 2 1 0 3 2 2 0 3 2 3 0 3 2 4 0 3 ------ 2 2 0 6 2 3 0 6 2 4 0 6 ------ 2 2 0 7 2 3 0 7 2 4 0 7 ------ 2 2 1 0 2 3 1 0 2 4 1 0 ------ 2 2 1 1 2 3 1 1 2 4 1 1 ------ 2 2 1 4 2 3 1 4 2 4 1 4 ------ 2 2 1 5 2 3 1 5 2 4 1 5 MAINTENANCE SHED M001 1. UNIT NUMBERS READ TOP TO BOTTOM (FLOOR 1-4) AS INDICATED ON THE UNIT STACK ONE BEDROOM UNITS TWO BEDROOM UNITS THREE BEDROOM UNITS LEGEND 3102 3202 3302 3402 3101 3201 3301 3401 3103 3203 3303 3403 3104 3204 3304 3404 3106 3206 3306 3406 3105 3205 3305 3405 3107 3207 3307 3407 3108 3208 3308 3408 3110 3210 3310 3410 3109 3209 3309 3409 3112 3212 3312 3412 3114 3214 3314 3414 3111 3211 3311 3411 3101 3201 3301 3401 TYPE A UNITS 3115 3215 3315 3415 3116 3216 3316 3416 ------ 3217 3317 3417 3118 3218 3318 3418 3119 3219 3319 3419 ------ 3220 3320 3420 ------ 3221 3321 3421 3122 3222 3322 3422 3123 3223 3323 3423 ------ 3224 3324 3424 1 1 0 5 1 2 0 5 1 3 0 5 1 4 0 5 NO UNIT - GARAGE ONLY----- * * * * * * *BUILDING SIGNAGE ------ 1 2 0 4 1 3 0 4 1 4 0 4 ------ 1 2 0 1 1 3 0 1 ------ ------ ------ 1 3 0 2 ------ ------ 1 2 0 3 1 3 0 3 1 4 0 3 1 1 0 6 1 2 0 6 1 3 0 6 1 4 0 6 1 1 0 7 1 2 0 7 1 3 0 7 1 4 0 7 1 1 1 0 1 2 1 0 1 3 1 0 1 4 1 0 1 1 0 8 1 2 0 8 1 3 0 8 1 4 0 8 1 1 0 9 1 2 0 9 1 3 0 9 1 4 0 9 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 3 1 2 1 4 1 2 1 1 1 5 1 2 1 5 1 3 1 5 1 4 1 5 1 1 1 6 1 2 1 6 1 3 1 6 1 4 1 6 1 1 1 7 1 2 1 7 1 3 1 7 1 4 1 7 ------ 1 2 1 8 1 3 1 8 1 4 1 8 ------ 1 2 1 5 1 3 1 5 1 4 1 5 ------ 1 2 1 4 1 3 1 4 1 4 1 4 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 4 1 1 1 1 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 3 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 3 2 1 1 4 2 1 1 1 2 4 1 2 2 4 1 3 2 4 1 4 2 4 1 1 2 5 1 2 2 5 1 3 2 5 1 4 2 5 1 1 2 8 1 2 2 8 1 3 2 8 1 4 2 8 1 1 2 9 1 2 2 9 1 3 2 9 1 4 2 9 1 1 3 2 1 2 3 2 1 3 3 2 1 4 3 2 1 1 3 3 1 2 3 3 1 3 3 3 1 4 3 3 1 1 3 6 1 2 3 6 1 3 3 6 1 4 3 6 1 1 3 7 1 2 3 7 1 3 3 7 1 4 3 7 ------ 1 2 1 9 1 3 1 9 1 4 1 9 ------ 1 2 2 2 1 3 2 2 1 4 2 2 ------ 1 2 2 3 1 3 2 3 1 4 2 3 ------ 1 2 2 6 1 3 2 6 1 4 2 6 ------ 1 2 2 7 1 3 2 7 1 4 2 7 ------ 1 2 3 0 1 3 3 0 1 4 3 0 ------ 1 2 3 1 1 3 3 1 1 4 3 1 ------ 1 2 3 4 1 3 3 4 1 4 3 4 ------ 1 2 3 5 1 3 3 5 1 4 3 5 1 1 3 8 1 2 3 8 1 3 3 8 1 4 3 8 APARTMENT PROJECTS WITH MULTIPLE BUILDINGS SHALL HAVE MONUMENT SIGNS ------- SHOWING THE STREET ADDRESSES OF EACH BUILDING AT EACH VEHICLE ENTRANCE TO THE SITE. EACH ETHICAL ENTRANCE SHALL ALSO HAVE AN ILLUMINATED SITE PLAN AND / OR DIRECTLY SIGNS. THE SIGNS SHALL SHOW THE LOCATION OF THE SIGN (THE VIEWER'S CURRENT LOCATION) AND ALL BUILDING ADDRESSES. DWELLING NUMBERS SHALL BE INCLUDED. THE MONUMENT SIGNS SHALL HAVE A CONTRASTING BACKGROUND COLOR. ALL SITE SIGNAGE TO BE PER OWNERS SPECIFICATION AND DESIGN AND UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT. * INDICATE APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF ILLUMINATED BUILDING ADDRESS SIGNAGE. SIGNAGE FOR BUILDINGS MUST INCLUDE THE ENTIRE BUILDING ADDRESS AND STREET NAME. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE NO LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT. THE BUILDING SIGN SHALL HAVE A CONTRASTING BACKGROUND COLOR. 542 1st AVE. SOUTH, FLOOR 4 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104 © 2019 KATERRA ARCHITECTURE LLC © 2019 KATERRA ARCHITECTURE II LLC © 2019 KATERRA ARCHITECTURE III PLLC © 2019 KATERRA ARCHITECTURE IV LLC ALL DRAWINGS, SPECIFICATIONS, PLANS, IDEAS, ARRANGEMENTS AND DESIGNS REPRESENTED OR REFERRED TO ARE THE PROPERTY OF AND ARE OWNED BY KATERRA INC. WHETHER THE PROJECT FOR WHICH THEY ARE MADE IS EXECUTED OR NOT. THEY WERE CREATED, EVOLVED, DEVELOPED AND PRODUCED FOR THE SOLE USE ON AND IN CONNECTION WITH THIS PROJECT AND NONE OF THE ABOVE MAY BE DISCLOSED OR GIVEN TO OR USED BY ANY PERSON, FIRM OR CORPORATION FOR ANY USE OR PURPOSE WHATSOEVER INCLUDING ANY OTHER PROJECT, EXCEPT UPON WRITTEN PERMISSION AND DIRECTION OF KATERRA INC. Owner Consultant BLDG. 1 BLDG. 2 BLDG. 3 Key plan Revisions Mark Date Description N 10/30/2020 UNIT NUMBERING/ ADDRESSING SHEET(1,2,3) G.00.014 ALEXAN GATEWAY APARTMENTS 23000 MILITARY RD S, KENT, WA 98032 RM RM 075-18001 12/13/19 IFC SET Drawn By Project Manager Job Number Date Of Original Professional Seal SCALE: 3/64" = 1'-0"1 UNIT NUMBERING PLAN NORTH 0 06/12/2019 PERMIT SET 2 01/09/2020 REV.3 ITCD UPDATES 6 05/22/2020 PC1 CORRECTIONS ''18 AG E N D A I T E M # 2 . d ) Phase 1B Phase 2 Phase 3 SE 260th St 18 9 t h A v e S E 1 8 8 t h A v e S E 19 1 s t P l S E SE 259th Pl 19 3 r d P l S E 19 6 t h A v e S E SE 2 5 9 t h S t SE 2 6 0 t h S t 19 9 t h A v e S E S E T i m b e r l a n e B l v d 198th Pl SE SE 2 5 6 t h S t SR 1 8 20 4 t h A v e S E 201s t A v e S E S E 2 5 8 t h S t 20 3 r d A v e S E S E 2 5 8 t h P l Phase 4 Phase 1A Phasing Legend Phasing MapLakepointe Urban Village Phasing MapLakepointe Urban Village 200 400 400' 0 100 SCALE: 1" = N NOTE: THE LOCATION OF DEVELOPMENT, INCLUDINGS ROADWAYS AND TRAILS, IS APPROXIMATE AND DOES NOT VEST TO THIER SPECIFIC LOCATION. THE LOCATION OF ALL DEVELOPMENT WILL BE BASED ON EXISTING CONDITIONS AT THE TIME OF APPLICATION AND THE TERMS OF THE PLANNED ACTION, THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, AND APPLICABLE LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL LAWS. January 30, 2017 Phase 1B - Approximate Years 2019-2024 Phase 2 - Approximate Years 2020-2025 Phase 3 - Approximate Years 2023-2028 Establishment of final grade, construction of Covington Connector to Southeast boundary, construction of first phase of commercial development. Establishment of final lake perimeter, construction of 191st Place SE extension and associated R-12 residential development, construction of second phase of commercial development on peninsula. Construction of third phase of commercial development. Preliminary Plat approval in third quarter 2021. Construction and Final Plat Recording 2022. Phase 1A - Maple Hills Division 5 Phase 4 - Approximate Years 2020-2027 Completion of gravel pit reclamation, construction of MR and R-12 residential development Updated September 15, 2021 11 9 10 8 8 19 AG E N D A I T E M # 2 . d ) 1 9 1 s t P l S E Jenkins Creek SE 260th St 18 9 t h A v e S E 1 8 8 t h A v e S E 19 1 s t P l S E SE 259th Pl 193 r d P l S E 19 6 t h A v e S E SE 2 5 9 t h S t SE 2 6 0 t h S t 19 9 t h A v e S E S E T i m b e r l a n e B l v d 198th Pl SE SE 2 5 6 t h S t SR 1 8 20 4 t h A v e S E 201s t A v e S E S E 2 5 8 t h S t 20 3 r d A v e S E S E 2 5 8 t h P l B RCMU PARKS 24,956 SF 0.57 AC RCMU PARKS 97,621 SF 2.24 AC MR PARKS 110,686 SF 2.54 AC R-12 PARKS 14,185 SF 0.33 AC R-12 PARKS 12,500 SF 0.29 AC MR PARKS 128,425 SF 2.95 AC R-12 PARKS 32,553 SF 0.75 AC R-6 PARKS 14,112 SF 0.32 AC R-12 PARKS 7,254 SF 0.17 AC R-6 OPEN SPACE 1,880,037 SF 43.16 AC R-12 OPEN SPACE 572,210 SF 13.14 AC R-12 OPEN SPACE 4,549 SF 0.10 AC R-12 OPEN SPACE 34,788 SF 0.80 AC RCMU OPEN SPACE 86,894 SF 1.99 AC R-6 PARKS 9,908 SF 0.23 AC MR PARKS 12,799 SF 0.29 AC MR OPEN SPACE 22,507 SF 0.52 AC R-12 OPEN SPACE 5,687 SF 0.13 AC R-6 OPEN SPACE 139,837 SF 3.21 AC R-6 OPEN SPACE 57,182 SF 1.31 AC P Covi n g t o n C o n n e c t o r Master Development PlanLakepointe Urban Village Master Development PlanLakepointe Urban Village January 30, 2017 Wetland Wetland Buffer Undisturbed Open Space Publicly Accessible Parks and Plazas Medium Density Residential (R-6) Central Pond Feature Covington Highlands Trail Trails / Offsite Trail Connections Stop Light Proposed Park and Ride Facility Transit Stop Proposed Truck and Bus Return Route Public Streets High Density Residential (R-12) Mixed Residential (MR) Mixed Use / Commercial (RCMU) Legend B Bike Route CENTRAL POND FEATURE Gateway Element Steep Slope and Buffer 200 400 400' 0 100 SCALE: 1" = N Proposed Trail Parking Focal Point / Public Gathering Spot Landscape Areas Jenkins Creek P Pedestrian / Wildlife Undercrossing NOTE: THE LOCATION OF DEVELOPMENT, INCLUDINGS ROADWAYS AND TRAILS, IS APPROXIMATE AND DOES NOT VEST TO THIER SPECIFIC LOCATION. THE LOCATION OF ALL DEVELOPMENT WILL BE BASED ON EXISTING CONDITIONS AT THE TIME OF APPLICATION AND THE TERMS OF THE PLANNED ACTION, THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, AND APPLICABLE LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL LAWS. Mix of Multi-Family and Commercial is Encouraged within Peninsula Area Updated September 15, 2021 Disturbed (Graded) Open Space SPECIAL PAVEMENT PARKS TABLE RCMU MR R-12 R-6 ZONE SQ FOOTAGE ACREAGE 122,577 SF 251,910 SF 66,492 SF 24,020 SF 2.81 AC 5.78 AC 1.53 AC 0.55 AC TOTAL 464,999 SF 10.67 AC POND TABLE RCMU MR R-12 R-6 ZONE SQ FOOTAGE ACREAGE 366,128 SF 106,040 SF 334,094 SF 0 SF 8.41 AC 2.43 AC 7.67 AC 0.00 AC TOTAL 806,262 SF 18.51 AC OPEN SPACE TABLE RCMU MR R-12 R-6 ZONE SQ FOOTAGE ACREAGE 86,984 SF 22,507 SF 617,234 SF 2,077,056 SF 1.99 AC 0.52 AC 14.17 AC 47.68 AC TOTAL 2,803,691 SF 64.36 AC COMBINED OPEN SPACE TABLE RCMU MR R-12 R-6 ZONE PARKS 2.81 AC 5.78 AC 1.53 AC 0.55 AC TOTAL 10.67 AC 91.25 AC 34.00 AC 35.34 AC 53.51 AC 214.10 AC OPEN SPACE* POND 8.41 AC 2.43 AC 7.67 AC 0.00 AC 18.51 AC *OPEN SPACE INCLUDES CRITICAL AREAS, BUFFERS, AND OTHER GREEN SPACES 13.21 AC 8.73 AC 23.37 AC 48.23 AC 93.55 AC NET ACRES** 78.03 AC 25.27 AC 11.98 AC 5.27 AC 120.55 AC 1.99 AC 0.52 AC 14.17 AC 47.68 AC 64.36 AC GROSS ACREAGE TOTAL AMENITIES WILDLIFE / PEDESTRIAN UNDER-CROSSING **NET ACRES EQUALS GROSS ACREAGE MINUS TOTAL AMENITIES FUTURE CONNECTION BEYOND PROPERTY BY OTHERS 3 6 4 6 1 2 5 7 20 AG E N D A I T E M # 2 . d ) VI - Portable Classrooms The Plan references use of portables as interim capacity for facilities. Currently, the District utilizes portables to house students in excess of functional capacity and for program purposes at some school locations (Please see Appendices A, B, C). Based on enrollment projections, implementation of full day kindergarten programs, lower state mandated class sizes, functional capacity, and no need for additional interim capacity, the District anticipates no need to purchase or lease additional portables during the next six- year period to ensure capacity requirement (Noted in section V. Six Yr. Planning Construction). During the time period covered by this Plan, the District does not anticipate that all of the District’s portables will be replaced by permanent facilities. During the useful life of some of the portables, the school-age population may decline in some communities and increase in others, and these portables provide the flexibility to accommodate the immediate needs of the community. Portables may be used as interim facilities: 1.To prevent overbuilding or overcrowding of permanent school facilities. 2.To cover the gap between the times of demand for increased capacity and completion of permanent school facilities to meet that demand. 3.To meet unique program requirements. Portables currently in the District’s inventory are continually evaluated and maintained. The District's goal is to reduce the number of portables so we may provide an equitable learning environment for all. The Plan projects that the District will use portables to accommodate interim housing needs for the next six years and beyond. The use of portables, their impacts on permanent facilities, life cycle and operational costs, and the interrelationship between portables, emerging technologies, and educational restructuring will continue to be examined. 21 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT FACTORS FOR ESTIMATED IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS Student Generation Factors - Single Family Student Generation Factors - Multi-Family Elementary (Grades K - 5)0.222 Elementary (Grades K - 5)0.075 Middle (Grades 6- 8)0.092 Middle (Grades 6- 8)0.030 Senior High (Grades 9 - 12)0.116 Senior High (Grades 9 - 12)0.032 Total 0.430 Total 0.137 Projected Increased Student Capacity OSPI - Square Footage per Student Elementary 0 Elementary 110 Middle 0 Middle 134 Senior High (Academy)0 Senior High 144 Special Education 153 Required Site Acreage per Facility Elementary (required)12 Average Site Cost / Acre Middle (required)25 Elementary $161,678 Senior High (required)40 Middle $0 Senior High $0 $68,000,000 Temporary Facility Capacity & Cost $155,000,000 Elementary @ 24 $315,000 $220,000,000 Middle @ 28 $315,000 Senior High @ 32 $315,000 State Funding Assistance Credit 123,702 District Funding Assistance Percentage 54.31% 10,256 21,296 155,254 Construction Cost Allocation CCA - Cost/Sq, Ft. $375.00 1,567,594 760,483 District Average Assessed Value 1,077,315 Single Family Residence $657,970 3,405,392 District Average Assessed Value 1,691,296 Multi-Family Residence $320,116 770,739 New Facility Construction Cost Elementary Middle Senior High Temporary Facility Square Footage Elementary Middle Senior High Total 4.4% Permanent Facility Square Footage Elementary Middle Senior High/Other Total 95.6% Total Facilities Square Footage Elementary Middle Senior High/Other 1,098,611 Total 3,560,646 Bond Levy Tax Rate/$1,000 $0.46 Current Rate / 1,000 Tax Rate 0.0005 Developer Provided Sites / Facilities Value 0 General Obligation Bond Interest Rate Dwelling Units 0 Current Bond Interest Rate 4.37% CPI Inflation Factor 5.80% Budget Preparations | OSPI (www.k12.wa.us) * Reflects current facility construction (APPENDIX A) 22 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT FACTORS FOR ESTIMATED IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS Site Acquisition Cost per Single Family Residence Formula: ((Acres x Cost per Acre) / Facility Capacity) x Student Generation Factor Required Site Acreage Average Site Cost/Acre Facility Capacity Student Factor A 1 (Elementary)12 $161,678 0 0.222 A 2 (Middle)25 $0 0 0.092 A 3 (Senior High)40 $0 0 0.116 Total 77 $161,678 0 0.430 A a $0.00 Permanent Facility Construction Cost per Single Family Residence Formula: ((Facility Cost / Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Permanent/Total Square Footage Ratio) Construction Cost Facility Capacity Student Factor Footage Ratio B 1 (Elementary)$68,000,000 0 0.222 0.903 B 2 (Middle)$155,000,000 0 0.092 0.984 B 3 (Senior High)$220,000,000 0 0.116 0.998 Total $443,000,000 0 0.430 B a $0.00 Temporary Facility Cost per Single Family Residence (Portables) Formula: ((Facility Cost / Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Temporary / Total Square Footage Ratio) Facility Cost Facility Capacity Student Factor Footage Ratio C 1 (Elementary)$315,000 24 0.222 0.097 $282.63 C 2 (Middle)$315,000 28 0.092 0.016 $15.99 C 3 (Senior High)$315,000 32 0.116 0.020 $23.57 Total $945,000 84 0.430 C a $322.20 State Funding Assistance Credit per Single Family Residence (formerly "State Match") Formula: Area Cost Allowance x SPI Square Feet per student x Funding Assistance % x Student Factor Construction Cost AllocationSPI Sq. Ft. / Student Assistance %Student Factor D 1 (Elementary)$375.00 110 0.5431 0.222 $4,973.44 D 2 (Middle)$375.00 134 0.5431 0.092 $2,510.75 D 3 (Senior High)$375.00 144 0.5431 0.116 $3,401.98 D a $10,886.17 Tax Credit per Single Family Residence Average SF Residential Assessed Value (AAV)$657,970 Net Present Value (per EQ) (NPV)8.32 Current Debt Service Rate / 1,000 ( r )0.05%TC a $2,534.98 (Below used to calculate NPV) Current Bond Interest Rate 4.37% Years Amortized (10 Years)- Used in NPV Calculation 10 Developer Provided Facility Credit Facility / Site Value Dwelling Units 0 0 FC a 0 Fee Recap ** A = Site Acquisition per SF Residence $0.00 B = Permanent Facility Cost per Residence $0.00 C = Temporary Facility Cost per Residence $322.20 Subtotal $322.20 D = State Match Credit per Residence $10,886.17 TC = Tax Credit per Residence $2,534.98 Subtotal $13,421.15 Total Unfunded Need ($13,098.95) 50% Developer Fee Obligation ($6,549) FC = Facility Credit (if applicable)$0 District Adjustment $6,549 Net Fee Obligation per Residence - Single Family $0.00 (APPENDIX B) 23 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT FACTORS FOR ESTIMATED IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS Site Acquisition Cost per Multi-Family Residence Unit Formula: ((Acres x Cost per Acre) / Facility Capacity) x Student Generation Factor Required Site Acreage Average Site Cost/Acre Facility Capacity Student Factor A 1 (Elementary)12 $161,678 0 0.075 A 2 (Middle)25 $0 0 0.030 A 3 (Senior High)40 $0 0 0.032 Total 77 $161,678 0 0.137 2 A $0.00 Permanent Facility Construction Cost per Multi-Family Residence Unit Formula: ((Facility Cost / Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Permanent / Total Square Footage Ratio) Construction Cost Facility Capacity Student Factor Footage Ratio B 1 (Elementary)$68,000,000 0 0.075 0.903 B 2 (Middle)$155,000,000 0 0.030 0.984 B 3 (Senior High)$220,000,000 0 0.032 0.998 Total $443,000,000 0 0.137 B $0.00 Temporary Facility Cost per Multi-Family Residence Unit Formula: ((Facility Cost / Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Temporary / Total Square Footage Ratio) Facility Cost Facility Capacity Student Factor Footage Ratio C 1 (Elementary)$315,000 24 0.075 0.097 $95.48 C 2 (Middle)$315,000 28 0.030 0.016 $5.21 C 3 (Senior High)$315,000 32 0.032 0.020 $6.50 Total $945,000 84 0.137 C $107.20 State Funding Assistance Credit per Multi-Family Residence (formerly "State Match") Formula: Area Cost Allowance x SPI Square Feet per student x Funding Assistance % x Student Factor Area Cost Allowance SPI Sq. Ft. / Student Equalization %Student Factor D 1 (Elementary)$375.00 110 0.5431 0.075 $1,680.22 D 2 (Middle)$375.00 134 0.5431 0.030 $818.72 D 3 (Senior High)$375.00 144 0.5431 0.032 $938.48 D $3,437.42 Tax Credit per Multi Family Residence Average MF Residential Assessed Value (AAV)$320,116 Net Present Value (per EQ) (NPV)8.32 Current Debt Service Rate / 1,000 ( r )0.05%TC $1,233.32 (Below used to calculate NPV) Current Bond Interest Rate 4.37% Years Amortized (10 Years)- Used in NPV Calcula 10 Developer Provided Facility Credit Facility / Site Value Dwelling Units 0 0 FC 0 Fee Recap ** A = Site Acquisition per Multi-Family Unit $0.00 B = Permanent Facility Cost per MF Unit $0.00 C = Temporary Facility Cost per MF Unit $107.20 Subtotal $107.20 D = State Match Credit per MF Unit $3,437.42 TC = Tax Credit per MF Unit $1,233.32 Subtotal $4,670.73 Total Unfunded Need ($4,563.53) 50% Developer Fee Obligation ($2,282) FC = Facility Credit (if applicable)0 District Adjustment $2,282 Net Fee Obligation per Residential Unit - Multi-family $0.00 (APPENDIX C) 24 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) VII - Projected Six-Year Classroom Capacity As stated in Section IV, the functional capacity study is periodically updated for changes in special programs and reflects class size requirements, class size fluctuations etc. As shown in the Inventory and Capacity chart in Table 3, the functional capacity is also reflected in the capacity and enrollment comparison charts (See Tables 5 & 5 a-b-c). Enrollment is electronically reported to OSPI on Form P-223 on a monthly basis and funding apportionment is based on Annual Average FTE (AAFTE). The first school day of October is widely recognized as the enrollment “snapshot in time” to report enrollment for the year. Kent School District continues to be the fifth largest district (both FTE and headcount basis) in the State of Washington. The P-223 Headcount for October 2024 was 24,432, excluding ECSE and college-only Running Start students. In October 2024, there were 1,159 students in 11th and 12th grade participating in the Running Start program at different colleges and receiving credits toward both high school and college graduation. Of these students, 629 attended classes only at the college (“college-only”) and are excluded from FTE and headcount for capacity and enrollment comparisons. Kent School District has one of the highest Running Start program participation rates in the State. Based on the enrollment forecasts, permanent facility inventory and capacity, current standard of service, portable capacity, and future additional classroom space, the District plans to continue to satisfy the required capacity through the interim use of portables (See Table 5 and Tables 5 a-b-c). While the District currently shows available capacity to address projected need on a purely statistical basis, there are a variety of extenuating factors that need to be considered. The Kent School District currently makes significant use of portables, which we do not consider as part of our permanent standard of service. We have included portable space in our interim capacity figures, and we do not count that as a permanent space solution. Kent School District is unusual in that it incorporates neighborhoods intersecting with 8 jurisdictions, including Kent, Covington, Auburn, Black Diamond, Maple Valley, Renton, unincorporated King County and SeaTac. The district covers 72 square miles and includes over 40 schools. Within this large geographic area, we expect to have pockets of localized capacity need that are not necessarily reflected in the aggregate figures. As one example, the Lakepointe Urban Village development in Covington may require new classroom capacity even as space may exist in schools on the far other end of the District’s boundaries. 25 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY TOTAL DISTRICT SCHOOL YEAR 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31 Actual Permanent Functional Capacity 1 35,494 35,494 35,494 35,494 35,494 35,494 35,494 Changes to Permanent Capacity 1 Capacity Increase (F) Additional Permanent Classrooms 0000000 Permanent Program Capacity Subtotal 35,494 35,494 35,494 35,494 35,494 35,494 35,494 Interim Portable Capacity Elementary Portable Capacity Required 3,228 3,228 3,228 3,228 3,228 3,228 3,228 Middle School Portable Capacity Required 375 375 375 375 375 375 375 High School Portable Capacity Required 608 608 608 608 608 608 608 Interim Portable Capacity Total 4,211 4,211 4,211 4,211 4,211 4,211 4,211 TOTAL CAPACITY 1 39,705 39,705 39,705 39,705 39,705 39,705 39,705 Total Enrollment/Projection 2 24,432 24,094 23,683 23,344 23,022 22,686 22,343 DISTRICT AVAILABLE CAPACITY 15,246 15,584 15,995 16,334 16,656 16,992 17,335 1 Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes. 2 Projection Source: School Facilities Organization, Information and Condition of Schools (Report 1049) P R O J E C T E D Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 May 2025 26 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY SCHOOL YEAR 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31 Actual Elementary Permanent Capacity 1 16,696 16,696 16,696 16,696 16,696 16,696 16,696 Additional Permanent Classrooms 2 0000000 Permanent Program Capacity Subtotal 16,696 16,696 16,696 16,696 16,696 16,696 16,696 Interim Portable Capacity 3,228 3,228 3,228 3,228 3,228 3,228 3,228 TOTAL CAPACITY 1 19,924 19,924 19,924 19,924 19,924 19,924 19,924 ENROLLMENT / PROJECTION 2 11,401 11,237 11,046 10,815 10,575 10,474 10,304 SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY 8,496 8,660 8,851 9,082 9,322 9,423 9,593 1 Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes. 2 Projection Source: School Facilities Organization, Information and Condition of Schools (Report 1049) ELEMENTARY: Grades K - 5 Elementary Grade K-5 P R O J E C T E D Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 A May 2025 27 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY SCHOOL YEAR 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31 Actual Middle School Permanent Capacity 1 7,216 7,216 7,216 7,216 7,216 7,216 7,216 Changes to Middle School Capacity 0000000 Permanent Program Capacity Subtotal 7,216 7,216 7,216 7,216 7,216 7,216 7,216 Portable Interim Capacity 1 375 375 375 375 375 375 375 TOTAL CAPACITY 1 7,591 7,591 7,591 7,591 7,591 7,591 7,591 ENROLLMENT / PROJECTION 2 5,815 5,717 5,632 5,633 5,640 5,484 5,361 SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY 1,776 1,874 1,959 1,958 1,951 2,107 2,230 1 Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes. MIDDLE SCHOOL: Grades 6 - 8 2 Projection Source: School Facilities Organization, Information and Condition of Schools (Report 1049) P R O J E C T E D Middle School Grade 6-8 Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 B May 2025 28 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY SCHOOL YEAR 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31 Actual Senior High Permanent Capacity 1 10,097 10,097 10,097 10,097 10,097 10,097 10,097 Changes to High School Capacity 0000000 Permanent Program Capacity Subtotal 10,097 10,097 10,097 10,097 10,097 10,097 10,097 Portables Interim Capacity 1 608 608 608 608 608 608 608 TOTAL CAPACITY 1 10,705 10,705 10,705 10,705 10,705 10,705 10,705 ENROLLMENT / PROJECTION 2 7,216 7,140 7,005 6,896 6,807 6,728 6,678 SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY 3,489 3,565 3,700 3,809 3,898 3,977 4,027 1 Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes. HIGH SCHOOL: Grades 9 - 12 P R O J E C T E D 2 Projection Source: School Facilities Organization, Information and Condition of Schools (Report 1049) Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 C May 2025 29 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) VIII - Finance Plan The finance plan shown on Table 6 demonstrates how the Kent School District plans to finance improvements for the years 2024-2025 through 2030-2031. The financing components include secured and unsecured funding and impact fees. The plan is based on future bond issues, state school construction assistance, collection of impact fees under the State Growth Management Act and voluntary mitigation fees paid pursuant to State Environmental Policy Act. In November 2016, the District held a special election to approve the authorization of $252,000,000 in bonding authority. The projects described below are part of this authorization. The first series of bonds ($80 million) were issued in February 2017, which funded the Covington Elementary Replacement School, as well as other infrastructure projects. Impact fees were used at both River Ridge Elementary School and Kent Laboratory Academy projects due to escalation in construction pricing across the Pacific Northwest. According to RCW 82.02.090, the definition of an impact fee is ". . . a payment of money imposed upon development as a condition of development approval to pay for public facilities needed to serve new growth and development, and that is reasonably related to the new development that creates additional demand and need for public facilities, that is a proportionate share of the cost of the public facilities, and that is used for facilities that reasonably benefit the new development. `Impact fee' does not include a reasonable permit or application fee." Mitigation or impact fees can be calculated on the basis of "unhoused student need" or "the maintenance of a district's level of service" as related to new residential development. A mitigation/impact fee may be imposed based upon a determination of insufficient existing permanent and/or interim portable school space or to pay for permanent and/or newly acquired interim portable school space previously constructed as a result of growth in the district. A district's School Board must first approve the application of the mitigation or impact fees and, in turn, approval must then be granted by the other general government jurisdictions having responsibility within the district, counties, cities and towns (Kent, Covington, Renton, Auburn, Black Diamond, Maple Valley, SeaTac, and Unincorporated King County). Though the current enrollment projections increase for both elementary and secondary schools are relatively flat, the ongoing need to provide permanent instructional facilities to house students is a driving need as the shifts in our family populations continue, due to ongoing development. Previously collected impact fees may be used to support and address the challenges related to the number of interim instructional facilities currently in use, the replacement of some of these aged facilities, the maintenance of the district's level of services, and the potential expansions to existing facilities in future years. The Kent School District 2024-2025 CFP update includes continued execution of the 2016 Capital Bond Projects, the 2018 Levy Projects, and the data collection and review of our Facility Assessment Reports. The District Facilities and Capital Planning Teams had come together and joined the Capital 30 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Bond Planning Task Force (CBPTF) which included District personnel, design professionals, teaching staff, student voices, as well as community members who collaborated and discussed the District’s needs. The initial plan revealed priorities including school replacement due to age, and the need for added permanent facilities to (1) reduce and eliminate our need for portables and (2) accommodate future growth as housing in the Kent region continues to expand. We started with a list of 2 billion in needs and through itemizing and prioritizing, we brought the list of essential projects to 495 million. This list was brought before the District’s Board of Directors for comments, discussion, and approval. A Capital Bond Measure followed and went out to vote in April 2023 and did not pass with voter approval. After the failure to pass the 2023 Bond, we re-evaluated needs as well as next steps. Surveys went out to the community to see what people would like to prioritize from the list of needed projects. A new list of projects was presented through the 2023 Levy in November. This levy did not pass. This list was again taken and revised to prioritize projects that are critical to operations and life safety within our buildings. In April we set forth our 2024 Levy to a vote, which also did not receive the needed support to pass. We once again reduced the Levy list to include only emergent needs to critical building operations, and the measure was approved by voters in November of 2024. Future updates to this Capital Facilities Plan will include details of any adopted planning. With the opening of Canyon Ridge Middle School, our sixth grade moving from elementary to middle school, and our boundary change, we have advanced opportunities to even out capacity at each site to accommodate our programs, district-wide site capacity, and student-based needs. For the Six-Year Finance Plan, costs of future schools are based on estimates from Kent School District Capital Planning Team. Please see pages 13-14 for a summary of the cost basis. Cost Basis Summary For impact fee calculations, construction estimated costs are based on the last elementary school built in Kent, adjusted for inflation, and projected cost future elementary school, as well as average pricing of nearby school districts recently built new middle and new high school projects. Project Projected Cost New Elementary School $68,000,000 New Middle School $155,000,000 New High School $220,000,000 Site Acquisition Cost The site acquisition cost is based on an average cost of sites purchased or built on within the last ten years. Please see Table 7 for a list of site acquisition costs and averages. District Adjustment The impact fee calculations on Appendix B & C result in a zero-dollar impact fee total for this year but may be adjusted if needed per RCW 36.70A.130(2)(b) provision. 31 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 SIX-YEAR FINANCE PLAN Secured Unsecured Impact SCHOOL FACILITIES *2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 TOTAL Local & State State 2 or Local 3 Fees 5 Estimated Estimated PERMANENT FACILITIES No School Projects at this time.$0 TEMPORARY FACILITIES Additional portables 3 - 4 $0 OTHER N / A Totals $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 * F = Funded U = Unfunded NOTES: 2 The District anticipates receiving some State Funding Construction Assistance for some projects. 3 Facility needs are pending review. Some of these projects may be funded with impact fees. 4 Cost of portables based on current cost and adjusted for inflation for future years. 5 Fees in this column are based on amount of fees collected to date and estimated fees on future units. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 6 May 2024 32 AG E N D A I T E M # 2 . d ) KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 Site Acquisitions & Costs Average of Sites Purchased, Sold or Built on within last 10 Years Type & # on Map School / Site Year Open / Purchased Sold Location Acreage Cost/Price Avg cost-price/acre Total Average Cost / Acre Elementary No Acquisitions for Elemenary Schools 0.00 $0 Elementary Site Subtotal 0.00 $0 $0 Elem site average Middle School No Acquisitions for Middle Schools 0.00 $0 Middle School Site Subtotal 0.00 $0 $0 Middle Schl Site Avg. Senior High No Acquisitions for High Schools 0.00 $0 $0 Senior High Site Subtotal 0.00 $0 $0 Sr Hi Site Average Note: All rural sites were purchased prior to adoption of Urban Growth Area. Numbers correspond to locations on Site Bank & Acquisitions Map on Page 17. 1 / Urban Site - Covington area North (So of Mattson MS)1984 2 / Rural Site - Ham Lake east (Pollard)1992 4 / Urban Site - Shady Lake (Sowers-Blaine-Drahota-Paroline)1995 0.00 $0 5 / Rural Site - SE of Lake Morton area (West property)1993 0 0 0 9 / Rural Site - McMillan Assemblage (South of MC)98 - 04 10 / Urban Site - Yeh-Williams (W of 132 Ave SE at SE 288)1999 12a / Urban Site - 156th Ave. SE Covington (Wikstrom)2004 12b / Urban Site - SE 256th St. Covington (West of CO)2004 16 Site - 11027 SE Kent-Kangley, WA 98030 2023 Site - 11027 SE Kent-Kangley, WA 98030 0.9 $1,382,696.90 Land included building 16a Site - 11109 SE Kent-Kangley, WA 98030 2023 Site - 11109 SE Kent-Kangley, WA 98030 0.84 $1,744,009.52 Land included building Total Acreage & Cost Total Average Cost / Acre #DIV/0! Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 7 May 202233 AG E N D A I T E M # 2 . d ) IX - Summary of Changes to June 2025 Capital Facilities Plan The Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") is updated annually based on previous Plans in effect since 1993. The primary changes from the June 2024 Plan are summarized here. Capacity changes continue to reflect fluctuations in class size ratio and program changes. Changes in portables or transitional capacity reflect use, lease or purchase, sale, surplus and/or movement between facilities. The District worked with Educational Data Solutions, LLC to update student generation factors. The updated rates are included in the body of the Plan. The District expects to receive some State Funding Assistance (formerly called “state matching funds”) for projects in this Plan and tax credit factors are updated annually. Unfunded site and facility need will be reviewed in the future. The impact fees for 2025 calendar year will result in no collection of impact fees for both Single-Family and Multi-Family due to the capacity study completed in spring 2025. 34 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) X - Appendices KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT FACTORS FOR ESTIMATED IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS Changes to Impact Fee Calculation Factors Include: ITEM Grade /Type FROM TO Increase/ Decrease Comments Student Generation Factor Elem 0.229 0.222 -0.007 Single Family (SF) MS 0.087 0.092 0.005 SH 0.113 0.116 0.003 Total 0.429 0.430 0.001 Student Generation Factor Elem 0.109 0.075 -0.034 Multi-Family (MF) MS 0.037 0.030 -0.007 SH 0.054 0.032 -0.022 Total 0.200 0.137 -0.063 State Funding Assistance Ratios (“State Match”) 52.88% 54.31% 1.43% Per OSPI Website Area Cost Allowance $375.00 $375.00 0.000 Per OSPI Website Link Average Assessed Valuation (AV) SF $594,679 $657,970 63,291 King County AV - Average of Condominiums & Apts. MF $310,811 $320,116 9,305 King County Debt Service Capital Levy Rate / $1000 $1.11 $0.46 ($0.65) Per King Co. Assessor Report General Obligation Bond Interest Rate 3.48% 4.37% 0.89% Bond Buyers 20 year GO Index Impact Fee - Single Family SF $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 No Change Impact Fee - Multi-Family MF $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 No Change 35 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) The Issaquah School District No. 411 hereby provides this Capital Facilities Plan documenting present and future school facility requirements of the District. The plan contains all elements required by the Growth Management Act and King County Council Ordinance 21-A. The Issaquah School District No. 411 hereby provides this Capital Facilities Plan documenting present and future school facility requirements of the District. The plan contains all elements required by the Growth Management Act and King County Council Ordinance 21-A. AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Page 2 of 30 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................... 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................. 3 STANDARD OF SERVICE ............................................................................................................... 4 WHEN TO CONSTRUCT A NEW BUILDING .................................................................................. 5 ENROLLMENT METHODOLOGY .............................................................................................. 6-7 TABLE 1: ACTUAL STUDENT COUNTS & ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS ................................. 8 TABLE 1A: 10-YEAR LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH ENROLLMENT FORECAST .................................... 9 TABLE 2: ENROLLMENT HISTORY .............................................................................................10 TABLE 3: STUDENT FACTORS – SINGLE FAMILY & MULTI-FAMILY .......................................11 INVENTORY AND EVALUATION OF CURRENT FACILITIES .....................................................12 SITE LOCATION MAP ...................................................................................................................13 URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY MAP ...........................................................................................14 SIX-YEAR CONSTRUCTION PLAN ..............................................................................................15 TABLE 4: PROJECTED CAPACITY TO HOUSE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL STUDENTS ............16 TABLE 5: PROJECTED CAPACITY TO HOUSE MIDDLE SCHOOL STUDENTS .......................17 TABLE 6: PROJECTED CAPACITY TO HOUSE HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS ...........................18 APPENDIX A: 6-YEAR FINANCE PLAN ........................................................................................19 APPENDIX B: 2024-25 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CAPACITIES ..................................................20 APPENDIX C: 2024-25 MIDDLE SCHOOL CAPACITIES .............................................................21 APPENDIX D: 2024-25 HIGH SCHOOL CAPACITIES ..................................................................22 APPENDIX E: 2024-25 TOTAL SCHOOL CAPACITIES ...............................................................23 NEED FOR IMPACT FEES AND GROWTH-RELATED CAPACITY NEEDS ........................ 24-25 BASIS FOR DATA USED IN SCHOOL IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS ......................................26 SCHOOL IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS .....................................................................................27 APPENDIX F: STUDENT GENERATION RATES MEMO ..................................................... 28-30 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Page 3 of 30 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") has been prepared by the Issaquah School District (the “District”) as the District’s primary facility planning document for the period 2025–2031. The Plan is prepared in compliance with the Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA) and King County Council Code Title 21A. The GMA, enacted in 1990, requires fast-growing counties and cities to develop comprehensive plans to manage population growth, protect natural resources, and coordinate land use with public infrastructure—including schools. Under the GMA, school districts are required to plan for future facility needs and demonstrate that adequate capacity exists to support projected development. This Plan incorporates enrollment projections, facility capacities, and known development trends using the most current data available as of April 2025. This Plan represents an update to previously adopted long-term Capital Facilities Plans. While it serves as the District’s primary planning document for the six-year period, it is not intended to provide a static or exhaustive response to all facility needs. The District actively monitors enrollment trends, development activity, facility utilization, and educational program changes, and adjusts planning efforts to respond to evolving conditions. As necessary, the District may develop interim or supplemental long-range Capital Facilities Plans consistent with Board policy and informed by updated data and forecasts. All such plans will align with the overall direction and framework provided in this Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan. In June 1992, the District first requested that King County impose and collect school impact fees on new developments in unincorporated areas. The King County Council adopted the District’s initial plan and implementing ordinance on November 16, 1992. This Plan represents the District’s annual update to the Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan. King County and the cities of Issaquah, Renton, Bellevue, Newcastle, and Sammamish currently collect school impact fees on behalf of the District. Most jurisdictions provide exemptions for senior housing and certain types of low-income housing. In accordance with the requirements of the Growth Management Act, the District will continue to update this Plan on an annual basis, with adjustments to the fee schedule(s) as needed to reflect current data and conditions. AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Page 4 of 30 STANDARD OF SERVICE School facility and student capacity needs are dictated by the types and amounts of space required to accommodate the District’s adopted educational program. The educational program standards which typically drive facility space needs include State-mandated requirements and locally adopted programming decisions relevant to grade configuration, optimal facility size, class size, educational program offerings, as well as classroom utilization and scheduling requirements and use of re- locatable classroom facilities (portables). Class sizes vary by grade level and program to reflect the differing instructional needs of students, including those in special education and highly capable programs. The Issaquah School Board has established local class size standards, which are maintained through the use of local levy funds. The District uses an average class size of 20 students for grades K–5, 26 students for grades 6–8, and 28 students for grades 9–12 when calculating building capacities. Special education class sizes are based on an average of 12 students per classroom. The District has offered Full-Day Kindergarten since the 2016–2017 school year. For the purposes of capacity analysis, rooms designated for special use, consistent with King County Council Code Title 21A, are excluded from classroom counts. Invariably, some classrooms will have student loads greater in number than this average level of service and some will be smaller. Program demands, state and federal requirements, collective bargaining agreements, and available funding may also affect this level of service in the years to come. Due to these variables, a utilization factor of 95% is used to adjust design capacities to what a building may actually accommodate. Historically, in Capital Facilities Plans, the ISD has used a utilization rate of 95% which is very conservative. Other districts use utilization rates between 70% to 85%. Lower utilization rates have the effect of showing less capacity. Portables used as classrooms accommodate enrollment increases for interim purposes until permanent classrooms are available. In addition to serving temporary capacity needs, portables also provide flexible instructional space that can be adapted to changing programmatic or scheduling requirements. When permanent facilities become available, portables may be relocated to other school sites to address emerging needs or removed from service, depending on long-term facility planning. The District currently has one undeveloped site, planned for a new high school and future elementary school. The State does not provide funding for property purchases. The District’s voters approved the 2016 Bond to provide funding for a new high school, new middle school, two new elementary schools, a rebuild/expansion of an existing middle school and additions to six existing elementary schools. All of those projects are now complete with the exception of the new high school and one new elementary school. The new high school is discussed further in this Capital Facilities Plan and will require additional funding sources. The new elementary school is on indefinite hold until capacity at the elementary level is needed. In 2022 voters approved a capital levy in amount of $44,000,000 to help pay for the new comprehensive high school. Unfortunately, due to construction cost escalation from conditions surrounding the pandemic, this amount plus other capital funds the district already had, was still not sufficient to build the full comprehensive high school as planned and designed. The District is currently working through a plan to build a portion of the new high using the funds from the previously approved levy and other dedicated capital funds. This plan would help alleviate some of the overcrowding at the high school level but would not solve the issue entirely. AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Page 5 of 30 WHEN TO CONSTRUCT A NEW BUILDING The Issaquah School District Capital Facilities Plan proposes construction of a new high school to meet capacity needs at the high school level related to recent enrollment growth. The District in recent years, funded by the 2016 Bond, completed construction of a new elementary school, Cedar Trails Elementary School, a new middle school, Cougar Mountain Middle School, as well as additions at several elementary schools, all to help address recent growth needs. The need for new schools and school additions is triggered by comparing our enrollment forecasts with our permanent capacity figures. These forecasts are by grade level and, to the extent possible, by geography. The analysis provides a list of new construction needed by school year. The decision on when to construct a new facility involves factors other than verified need. Funding is the most serious consideration. Factors including the potential tax rate for our citizens, the availability of state funds and impact fees, the ability to acquire land, and the ability to pass bonds and capital levies determine when any new facility can be constructed. New school facilities are a response, in part, to new housing which the county or cities have approved for construction. The District's Six-Year Finance Plan is shown in Appendix A. AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Page 6 of 30 ENROLLMENT METHODOLOGY Development Tracking and Student Generation Rates In order to increase the accuracy and validity of enrollment projections, a major emphasis has been placed on the collection and tracking data of known new housing developments. This data provides two useful pieces of planning information. First, it is used to determine the actual number of students that are generated from a single family or multi-family residence. Secondly, it provides important information on the impact new housing developments will have on existing facilities and/or the need for additional facilities. Developments that have been completed or are still selling houses are used to forecast the number of students who will attend our schools from future developments. The District used a third-party consultant to review recent development data and provide updated student generation rates for elementary school, middle school and high school student per new single-family residence and new multi-family housing. Updated rates are shown in Table 3. Enrollment Methodology The District uses two primary methods to estimate future student enrollment. These projections are inherently variable and are influenced by local land use decisions, market conditions, economic factors, and regional infrastructure improvements, including major transit projects. As such, the District analyzes a range of scenarios and, for planning purposes, adopts the high-range projection to ensure adequate capacity is available to meet potential growth. 1. The student 3-2-1 cohort survival method. Examine Issaquah School District enrollments for the last 5 years and determine the average cohort survival for the consecutive five-year period. Because cohort survival does not consider students generated from new development it is a conservative projection of actual enrollment. For the same reason, these projections are also slow to react to actual growth. The cohort method is also hampered by the fact that it does not account for anomalies affecting enrollment (i.e., the Covid-19 pandemic, temporary remote learning and the variations in the transition back to in-person learning). 2. Based on information from King County, realtors, developers, etc., the District seeks to establish the number of new dwelling units that will be sold each year and converts those units to new students based on the following: a) The number of actual new students as a percentage of actual new dwellings for the past several years. (The student generation factors are shown in Table 3) b) Determine the actual distribution of new students by grade level for the past several years, i.e., 5% to kindergarten, 10% to first grade, 2% to 11th grade, etc. c) Based on an examination of the history shown by (a) and (b) above, establish the most likely factor to apply to the projected new dwellings. After applying these methods, current enrollment is moved forward year-by-year, with adjustments for anticipated new students. It is important to note that while new housing typically signals growth, enrollment may decline even as population increases. This occurs as communities mature, resulting in fewer young children per household. To address this, the District monitors the number of school-age children per dwelling and adjusts projections accordingly, particularly at the kindergarten level. However, no precise statistical formula currently exists to capture these shifts perfectly. AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Page 7 of 30 ENROLLMENT METHODOLOGY (cont.) Past experience has shown that cohort-based projections tend to be more accurate over longer periods (e.g., 10 years), while development-based projections are more reliable in the short term. Recognizing this, the District examines both methods and adopts a projection range. For planning purposes, the high projection is used to ensure the District is prepared to meet growth-related facility needs (Table 1A). Enrollment projections for the 2025–26 through 2030–31 school years are provided in Table 1. Although modest increases are anticipated during this period, the District does not expect to return to historical peak enrollment levels in the near term. Several factors are expected to influence future enrollment, including: • Market conditions, such as housing supply and affordability • Regional labor trends that affect family relocation and job accessibility • Residential development activity within the District’s boundaries • Major infrastructure projects, particularly the planned Sound Transit light rail extension to the City of Issaquah, which is likely to: o Increase residential density near transit stations o Attract new families due to enhanced commuter access o Contribute to long-term enrollment growth beyond the current six-year planning horizon The City of Issaquah’s 2044 Comprehensive Plan anticipates zoning and infrastructure to support more than 14,000 new housing units, with 3,500 targeted by 2044. These units, concentrated in areas such as Central Issaquah and the Issaquah Highlands, are expected to impact school enrollment over the next two decades. While substantial increases in student population are not expected within the current six-year planning horizon, significant growth is projected in the 15-to-20-year timeframe. The District will continue to monitor local development activity, housing trends, and transit infrastructure plans to refine its projections and update future Capital Facilities Plans accordingly. Ongoing coordination with the City of Issaquah will be essential in planning for future school capacity, especially in areas of anticipated high-density development and transit access. AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Page 8 of 30 TABLE 1: ACTUAL STUDENT COUNTS & ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS ACTUAL STUDENT COUNTS: 2024-25 ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS: 2025-26 THRU 2030-31 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Page 9 of 30 TABLE 1A: 10-YEAR LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH ENROLLMENT FORECAST The District uses the high enrollment forecast shown in the chart above as the basis for long-range facilities planning. While actual enrollment may align more closely with medium or low projections over the short term, relying on the high projection allows the District to proactively address potential capacity needs and avoid underbuilding in the face of uncertain future growth. This approach ensures that school facilities can accommodate increases in student population that may result from market conditions, housing development, or regional infrastructure projects. Using the high forecast reflects a conservative and responsible planning strategy that prioritizes preparedness and long-term flexibility. AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Page 10 of 30 TABLE 2: ENROLLMENT HISTORY The 10-Year Enrollment History table provides critical context for interpreting the six-year enrollment projections presented in Table 1. These historical headcounts, based on October 1st data, illustrate key enrollment trends, including a peak in 2019–20, a decline during the COVID-19 pandemic, and modest stabilization in recent years. It is important to clarify that the high projection presented in Table 1 does not rely solely on a traditional cohort progression model, where student counts are advanced from grade to grade based strictly on historical trends. Instead, the high forecast incorporates additional factors such as projected housing development, updated student generation rates, and regional influences—including the planned Sound Transit light rail extension into Issaquah. This approach allows the District to plan proactively for potential enrollment increases that may arise from new residential growth and infrastructure investments, ensuring school facilities can accommodate a range of future scenarios. AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Page 11 of 30 TABLE 3: STUDENT FACTORS – SINGLE FAMILY & MULTI-FAMILY Table 1 provides student generation rates (SGRs) based on recent housing development within the District. These rates quantify the average number of students generated per new single-family and multi-family housing unit by grade level and are a critical input for projecting future enrollment and assessing the impact of residential growth on school facility needs. AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Page 12 of 30 INVENTORY AND EVALUATION OF CURRENT FACILITIES Currently, using the 95% utilization factor, the District has the capacity to house 18,630 students in permanent facilities and an additional 4,688 students in portables. While portables are critical for meeting short-term enrollment fluctuations, they are not considered a viable long-term solution for capacity planning. For that reason, the District relies on its adjusted permanent capacity when determining growth-related needs. The projected student enrollment for the 2025–26 school year is 18,355, leaving a modest districtwide surplus of 275 permanent seats. However, this overall surplus does not reflect the ongoing imbalance across grade levels. High school enrollment continues to exceed permanent capacity, and projections show that this pressure will persist throughout the six-year planning period. As a result, the District remains focused on identifying long-term solutions to address high school overcrowding, even as elementary and middle school capacity remains sufficient. Calculations of elementary, middle school, and high school capacities are provided in Appendices B, C, and D, respectively. These facility locations and sites are shown on the District Site Location Map. EXISTING FACILITIES LOCATION GRADE SPAN K-5: Apollo Elementary 15025 S.E. 117th Street, Renton Briarwood Elementary 17020 S.E. 134th Street, Renton Cascade Ridge Elementary 2020 Trossachs Blvd. S.E., Sammamish Cedar Trails Elementary 4399 Issaquah-Pine Lake Rd S.E. , Sammamish Challenger Elementary 25200 S.E. Klahanie Blvd., Issaquah Clark Elementary 335 First Ave. S.E., Issaquah Cougar Ridge Elementary 4630 167th Ave. S.E., Bellevue Creekside Elementary 20777 SE 16th Street, Sammamish Discovery Elementary 2300 228th Ave. S.E., Sammamish Endeavour Elementary 26205 S.E. Issaquah-Fall City Rd., Issaquah Grand Ridge Elementary 1739 NE Park Drive, Issaquah Issaquah Valley Elementary 555 N.W. Holly Street, Issaquah Maple Hills Elementary 15644 204th Ave. S.E., Issaquah Newcastle Elementary 8440 136th Ave S.E., Newcastle Sunny Hills Elementary 3200 Issaquah-Pine Lake Rd. S.E., Sammamish Sunset Elementary 4229 W. Lk. Sammamish Pkwy. S.E., Issaquah GRADE SPAN 6-8: Beaver Lake Middle School 25025 S.E. 32nd Street, Issaquah Cougar Mountain Middle School 1929 NW Talus Dr, Issaquah Issaquah Middle School 600 2nd Ave. Ave. S.E., Issaquah Maywood Middle School 14490 168th Ave. S.E., Renton Pacific Cascade Middle School 24635 SE Issaquah-Fall City Rd, Issaquah Pine Lake Middle School 3095 Issaquah-Pine Lake Rd., Sammamish GRADE SPAN 9-12: Issaquah High School 700 Second Ave. S.E., Issaquah Liberty High School 16655 S.E. 136th Street, Renton Skyline High School 1122 228th Ave. S.E., Sammamish Gibson Ek High School 379 First Ave. S.E., Issaquah SUPPORT SERVICES: Administration Building 5150 220th Ave S.E., Issaquah Holly Street Early Learning Center 565 N.W. Holly Street, Issaquah May Valley Service Center 16404 S.E. May Valley Road, Renton Transportation Center - Main 805 Second Avenue S.E., Issaquah Transportation Center - Satellite 3402 228th Ave. S.E., Sammamish AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Page 13 of 30 SITE LOCATION MAP AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Page 14 of 30 URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY MAP AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Page 15 of 30 SIX-YEAR CONSTRUCTION PLAN The District's Six-Year Finance Plan is shown in Appendix A. State funding and impact fees are also not reliable sources of revenue for construction related projects. State funding is available only for certain qualifying school construction projects, with funds received only after the matched project is complete. Site acquisition and site improvements are not eligible to receive state matching funds. Impact fee revenue is dependent on growth activity and not always easy to predict. As a result, the District must also rely on voter-approved ballot measures to fund school construction. Table 6 presents the District’s projected capacity to accommodate high school students, including the addition of a new high school facility. In April 2016, voters approved a $533 million bond to fund a range of capital projects, including land acquisition and construction of a new high school, a new middle school, two new elementary schools, the rebuild and expansion of an existing middle school, and additions to six existing elementary schools. To support the high school project further, voters passed a $44 million capital levy in April 2022. These funds will be used to construct a new high school to alleviate overcrowding at existing campuses. The District also anticipates receiving State matching funds for the high school project, which will be applied back to the project. AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Page 16 of 30 TABLE 4: PROJECTED CAPACITY TO HOUSE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL STUDENTS AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Page 17 of 30 TABLE 5: PROJECTED CAPACITY TO HOUSE MIDDLE SCHOOL STUDENTS AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Page 18 of 30 TABLE 6: PROJECTED CAPACITY TO HOUSE HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS As shown in Table 6, the District’s high school enrollment is projected to exceed existing permanent capacity beginning in 2025 and continuing through the 6-year planning period. In 2025 and 2026, the District is expected to operate with a permanent capacity deficit of over 1,000 students after accounting for a 95% utilization rate. To address this growing enrollment pressure, the District will add permanent capacity for 656 high school students in 2027 through the construction of a new high school facility. This added capacity significantly reduces the shortfall, bringing the permanent capacity deficit down to fewer than 400 students and continuing to narrow the gap through 2030. As needed to address capacity needs, before the high school addition is complete, the District may consider adjusting the building utilization factor to create additional interim capacity. With this new capacity in place, the District will be positioned to phase out its reliance on portable classrooms. While portables will still be required in the short term, the addition of permanent space sets the stage for a gradual reduction in their use. This transition will enhance the learning environment and promote more equitable access to core instructional spaces and amenities. The strategy aligns with the District’s long-term capital planning goals and its commitment to providing equitable, high-quality educational facilities across all attendance areas. AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Page 19 of 30 APPENDIX A: 6-YEAR FINANCE PLAN AG E N D A I T E M # 2 . d ) Page 20 of 30 APPENDIX B: 2024-25 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CAPACITIES AG E N D A I T E M # 2 . d ) Page 21 of 30 APPENDIX C: 2024-25 MIDDLE SCHOOL CAPACITIES AG E N D A I T E M # 2 . d ) Page 22 of 30 APPENDIX D: 2024-25 HIGH SCHOOL CAPACITIES AG E N D A I T E M # 2 . d ) Page 23 of 30 APPENDIX E: 2024-25 TOTAL SCHOOL CAPACITIES AG E N D A I T E M # 2 . d ) Page 24 of 30 NEED FOR IMPACT FEES AND GROWTH-RELATED CAPACITY NEEDS The District historically relied on school impact fee revenue to help fund growth-related capacity needs. However, by law, impact fees can only be used to fund a portion of a growth-related capacity project. As demonstrated in Appendix B the District currently has a permanent capacity (at 95%) to serve 8,763 students at the elementary level. This leaves the District’s elementary enrollment under permanent capacity by 901 students (current enrollment is identified in Table 1). As demonstrated in Appendix C the District currently has a permanent capacity (at 95%) to serve 4,946 students at the middle school level. This leaves the District’s middle school enrollment under permanent capacity by 469 students (current enrollment is identified in Table 1). As demonstrated in Appendix D the District currently has a permanent capacity (at 95%) to serve 4,921 students at the high school level. This leaves the District’s high school enrollment over permanent capacity by 1,095 students (current enrollment is identified in Table 1). The capacity need is driven by historic and recent growth. However, the District’s six-year enrollment projections in Table 1 demonstrate that the District does not anticipate growth to occur over the six-year planning period. Thus, while the high school capacity need remains significant, it is not related to anticipated growth in the six-year period and, therefore, the project is no longer eligible as a basis for impact fees. Future updates to this CFP will consider growth-related eligibility for inclusion in the impact fee formula. Based on the District’s student generation rates (Table 3), the District expects that 0.615 students will be generated from each new single family home and 0.189 students will be generated from each new multi-family dwelling unit. Comparatively, the previous year SGR’s were 0.641 for single family home and 0.159 for a multi-family unit. Applying the enrollment projections contained in Table 1 to the District’s existing permanent capacity (Appendices A, B, and C) and if no capacity improvements are made by the year 2029-30, and permanent capacity is adjusted to 95%, the District elementary population will be under its permanent capacity by 659 students, under permanent capacity at the middle school level by 838 students, and over permanent capacity by 778 students at the high school level. Importantly, the above figures incorporate recently completed growth-projects at the elementary and middle school levels. The District recently opened the new Cougar Mountain Middle School, with permanent capacity of 828, and the new Cedar Trails Elementary School, with permanent capacity of 496 students. Both schools were funded by the April 2016 bond and provide capacity to serve new growth. AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Page 25 of 30 NEED FOR IMPACT FEES AND GROWTH-RELATED CAPACITY NEEDS (cont) In those years when the District requests school impact fees for growth-related projects, the school impact fee formula ensures that new development only pays for the cost of the facilities nec essitated by new development. The fee calculations examine the costs of housing the students generated by each new single family dwelling unit or each new multi-family dwelling unit and then reduces that amount by credits for the anticipated state match and future tax payments. The resulting impact fee is then discounted as required by local ordinances. Thus, by applying the student generation factor to the school project costs, the fee formula only calculates the costs of providing capacity to serve eac h new dwelling unit. The formula does not require new development to contribute the costs of providing capacity to address existing needs. The King County Council and the City Councils of the cities of Bellevue, Issaquah, Newcastle, Renton and Sammamish have created a framework for collecting school impact fees and the District can demonstrate that new developments will have an impact on the District. Impact fees must be used in a manner consistent with RCW 82.02.050-110 and the adopted local ordinances. Engrossed Senate Bill 5923, enacted in the 2015 Legislative Session, requires that developers be provided an option to defer payment of impact fees to final inspection, certificate of occupancy, or closing, with no fees deferred longer than 18 months from building permit issuance. The District adopts the positions that: (1) no school impact fee should be collected later than the earlier of final inspection or 18 months from the time of building permit issuance; and (2) no developer applicant should be permitted to defer payment of school impact fees for more than 20 dwelling units in a single year. The District is not requesting school impact fees as a part of this 2025 Capital Facilities Plan update. AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Page 26 of 30 BASIS FOR DATA USED IN SCHOOL IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS This section is not updated for the 2025 Capital Facilities Plan since the District is not requesting a school impact fee. Future updates to this CFP may include an impact fee. AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Page 27 of 30 SCHOOL IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS This section is not updated for the 2025 Capital Facilities Plan since the District is not requesting a school impact fee. Future updates to this CFP may include an impact fee. AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Page 28 of 30 APPENDIX F: STUDENT GENERATION RATES MEMO AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Page 29 of 30 APPENDIX F: STUDENT GENERATION RATES MEMO (cont) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Page 30 of 30 APPENDIX F: STUDENT GENERATION RATES MEMO (cont) AGENDA ITEM #2. d) D>‘énton CAPITAL PLANNING SCHOOL DISTRICT AND CONSTRUCTION SERVICE |EXCELLENCE |EQUITY DATE:June 16,2025 TO:Dr.Damien Pattenaude,Superintendent FROM:Matt Feldmeyer,Executive Director,Capital Planning and Construction Mee Ss FOR BOARD MEETING:June 25,2025 G/\e/2 CONSENT AGENDAITEM:2025-2031 Capital Facilities Plan A Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan,to be updated annually,is required by the Washington State Growth Management Act and the School Impact Fee Ordinance Act,of King County,Code Title 21A.If serves as a guide to the development of school facilities and forms the basis for the calculation of school impact fees that are imposed on new development by King County and the cities whose service areas overlap the Renton School District. The Plan is intended to evaluate the need for future facilities based on forecast enrollment growth and student capacity of existing facilities.The Plan also identifies potential sources of funding for additional construction or acquisition. DISTRICT GOALS: Removing Barriers &Supporting Students BUDGET IMPLICATION: This item has no budget implication. RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the District's 2025 Capital Facilities Plan. Attachment:2025 Capital Facilities Plan Recommendations: |haye reviewed ang |a i.i _ jennifer A.(Fprmer /pe ‘Agsistant Stperintendent of Finance and Operations/CFO SERVICE |EXCELLENCE |EQUITY 7812 S 124 St,Seattle,Washington 98178-4830 |p.425.204.4403 |£.425.204.4476 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) 1 2025 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Renton School District No. 403 Board of Directors Stefanie McIrvin, Ed. D, President Justin Booker, Vice President Avanti Bergquist, MD Susan Talley Pam Teal Damien Pattenaude, Ed. D, Superintendent Adopted: _June 25, 2025_ AGENDA ITEM #2. d) 2025 SIX YEAR CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Renton School District No. 403 TABLE OF CONTENTS II. II. IV. VI. VIL. VII. INTRODUCTION ENROLLMENT TRENDS STANDARD OF SERVICE & CAPACITY ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS GROWTH RELATED PROJECTS SIX-YEAR FINANCE PLAN IMPACT FEES APPENDICES AGENDA ITEM #2. d) I. INTRODUCTION Purpose of the Capital Facilities Plan: This Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan (the “Plan”)is prepared by the Renton School District (the “District”) in compliance with the requirements of the Washington State Growth Management Act (the “GMA”), King County Code, and applicable ordinances of the cities of Bellevue, Newcastle, and Renton. The Plan was prepared using data available in the spring of 2025. The GMA outlines 14 broad goals including adequate provision of necessary public facilities and services. Schools are among these necessary facilities and services. School districts adopt capital facilities plans to satisfy the requirements of RCW 36.70A.070 and to identify additional school facilities necessary to meet the educational needs of the growing student populations anticipated in their districts. It is the District’s intent that the Plan be adopted by King County and the cities of Bellevue, Newcastle, Renton, SeaTac, and Tukwila as a sub-element of their respective Capital Facilities Plans. Currently, King County and the cities of Bellevue, Newcastle, and Renton collect school impact fees on behalf of the District when requested. The Capital Facilities Plan contains the following required elements: 1. Enrollment forecasts for each grade span over the next six years. 2. Aninventory of the existing capital facilities owned by the District and capacity of those facilities based on the District’s current Standard of Service. 3. A forecast of future needs for capital facilities and the proposed capacities of expanded or new facilities. 4. A six-year plan for financing those capital improvements. As relevant, a calculation of school impact fees and data substantiating such fees.5. Overview of the Renton School District: The District is located on the south end of Lake Washington,eleven miles southeast of Seattle and eleven miles south of Bellevue. Home to more than 100,000 people who value working, living, and playing in the Pacific Northwest, Renton has a strong economic base and a favorable business climate. The District spans approximately thirty-two square miles and serves a diverse population of approximately 14,000 students in pre-K through 12th grade at four high schools, four middle schools, sixteen elementary schools, and an early childhood learning center. District programs also address the special needs of disabled, academically gifted, and artistically talented students. Three schools (Renton Park Elementary, McKnight Middle, and Lindbergh High) are U.S. Department of Education-recognized Blue-Ribbon Schools of Excellence. Community support for Renton schools is strong. School levies, which make up 25% of the district's budget, have been consistently approved by the community for more than 20 years. Voter-approved bond measures or capital facilities levies from 1992 through 2022 have brought exciting improvements in school buildings and support facilities, including the rebuilding of all AGENDA ITEM #2. d) elementary schools, the remodeling of most middle and high schools, and the recent additional construction of two new elementary schools (Sartori and Hilltop Heritage) and a middle school (Risdon). Voter support has also provided state-of-the-art technology -a must to prepare students for living and working in this leading high-tech region. Every classroom has high-speed Internet connections and ample computer devices for all students. Ensuring each student graduates with options and is prepared to participate fully in our democracy is at the heart of Renton School District's mission. Three core values of Service, Excellence, and Equity guide the district’s strategic framework in family and community engagement, excellence in learning and teaching, and removing barriers and supporting students. Students are encouraged to reach for excellence through a variety of programs that focus on rigorous academic skills, problem solving, creative and critical thinking, and social and emotional growth. Renton School District staff are committed to preparing all students for success in their post-secondary journey. Teachers are encouraged to take an active role in promoting their own professional growth through collaborating on the use and development of high-quality instructional materials, sharing successful strategies, and looking for new ways to assess student progress. This focus on continuous staff development enables teachers to consistently improve the quality of instruction and prepares them to help students meet rigorous state academic standards. The District’s voters in 2019 approved a $249.6 M bond measure to fund a new elementary school (Hilltop Heritage Elementary School) to accommodate enrollment needs. Sartori Elementary School opened in 2018 as a choice school, providing additional capacity relief. The voters in November 2022 approved a $676 M bond to fund property acquisition and construction of a new Renton High School and security, seismic, and building systems updates at various schools throughout the District. Property acquisition is currently in process and the high school project is in the design phase currently. In recent years the District’s K-12 enrollment has seen an overall decline. Consistent with much of the region, the District’s enrollment was affected by the global pandemic, lower birth rates, and increases in home based school instruction. The number of new homes planned for future construction in the District continues to be higher than the number of permitted units that were built between 2019 and 2023. The District anticipates, based on recent enrollment projections, that enrollment at all grade levels is likely to see a small decrease over the six year planning period. The District plans to monitor actual enrollment patterns closely and will incorporate new information as a part of future updates to this Plan. AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Il. STANDARD OF SERVICE & CAPACITY The District’s Standard of Service is the standard adopted by the District that identifies the program year, school organizational structure, student/teacher ratios by grade level (considering the requirements of students with special needs), daily class schedule, types of facilities and other factors identified by the District as necessary to support its educational programs and objectives. The Standardof Service is used to ascertain current and future capacity. It should also be noted that although the State Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square foot guidelines for capacity funding criteria, those guidelines do not account for the actual program needs in the District. The Growth Management Act and King County Code 21A.43 authorize the District to adjust the standard of service based on the District's specific needs. The District uses a traditional elementary (K-5)/middle (6-8)/high school (9-12) organizational structure. The District, and the Renton Education Association, recognize that reasonable class size is necessary for optimum learning, and have established the following targets in student/teacher ratios for most regular classroom purposes: Students receive instruction in classes such as band/orchestra, choir, physical education at a larger ratio based on program and space. Student /teacher ratio for special education classes held in self-contained classrooms within comprehensive elementary and secondary facilities is assumed to be 12:1. Educational facilities dedicated solely to special education or other specialized programs are excluded from capacity calculations, as are associated student headcounts. At the high school level, due to adopted State and local graduation requirements,it is not possible to achieve 100% utilization of regular teaching stations. Based on actual utilization due to these considerations, the District uses a standard utilization rate of 80% at the high school level (4 out of 5 periods) for determining high school capacity. Beginning with the graduating class of 2020-2021, high school graduation requirements require one additional credit of science (three instead of two), and a total of twenty-four credits; three more than the previously required 21. This requirement impacts high school capacity as well. Additionally, similar to the high school utilization rate, a typical middle school utilizes a six period day and requires that one period be designated for teacher planning. This requirement reduces middle school capacity by one-sixth, or 17 percent. Student/teacher ratios are applicable to both permanent and relocatable classrooms. However, since relocatable facilities do not allow for the full range of educational activities promoted by the District, they are generally viewed as temporary or interim housing, necessary to Grade Levels K-1 21% Grade Level 2 22:1 Grade Level 3 24:1 Grade Levels 4-12 29:1 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) accommodate enrollment fluctuations and interim development driven enrollment increases until such time as permanentfacilities can be financed and constructed. For those reasons,relocatable classrooms capacities are calculated, but not used in the analysis of future facility needs. Using the Standard of Service, the District calculates building capacity for each of its facilities. The calculation is made by reviewing the use of each classroom/teaching station in each facility in collaboration with individual school leadership. Spaces in buildings used for special program purposes such as special education and alternative learning environments are not included in the District’s regular classroom capacity. Core facilities, such as the cafeteria or gymnasium,are not considered regular classrooms. A building’s regular classroom capacity may change from year to year. For example,if the school enrollment has a higher number of special education students in a given year, there is potential that a teaching station is removed from the capacity inventory, thereby reducing the overall school capacity for that given year. Capacity at the secondary school level is further limited by the previously identified class scheduling restrictions and student distribution among elective classes. Based on a typical middle school six-period day, where one period is designated for teacher planning, capacity is reduced by one-sixth, or 17 percent of theoretical capacity. Similarly, at high schools with a five-period day, capacity is reduced for a teacher planning period by one-fifth, or 20 percent. Elective classes, many of which require specialized classrooms, also figure into the equation for determining a school’s capacity, which together with required classes, require a well thought out master schedule if the facility’s capacity is to be maximized. The District’s capital facilities include both permanent structures and relocatable (interim or portable) classrooms. The District’s permanent K-12 facilities include 16 elementary schools, four middle schools, and four high schools. Two Special Instructional Use facilities house the District’s early childhood, special education, and alternative learning programs. Support facilities include the Kohlwes Education Center (District administration), Transportation Center, Facilities Operations and Maintenance Center, Nutrition Services/Warehouse, Renton Memorial Stadium, and the Lindbergh Swimming Pool. Total permanent facilities encompass 2,670,757 square feet, with 2,495,051 square feet (93%) devoted to K-12 and instructional special use. See Appendix A for District Maps. The District currently has a permanent K-12 facilities capacity of 15,342 (including the opening of Hilltop Heritage Elementary School fall of 2023). See Tables 1 & 2 below and Appendix B. Importantly, current and future capacity at the elementary level, as documented in this report, is based on the District’s current Standard of Service, and does not necessarily reflect aspirational K-3 student/teacher ratios of seventeen students to one teacher. The District continues to make progress towards these requirements, by utilizing available classroom space, added staffing and plans to utilize the new elementary school classrooms to work towards this ratio. Most recent ratios have been anywhere from 17.3 to 19:1 but staffing recent enrollment changes and budget impacts have slowed the district’s progress. The District relocatable or portable facilities are used primarily to address enrollment fluctuations and to house students on an interim or temporary basis until permanent facilities can Current Capacity: AGENDA ITEM #2. d) || be constructed. For those reasons they are not considered a long-term solution for housing students and are not considered “permanent” capacity. Of the 55 relocatable facilities in the ” containing two classrooms (approximately 1,792District’s inventory, 46 are “double portables square feet together), and nine are singles (each approximately 896 square feet). See Appendix B. Combined, they provide the District with a total of 101 relocatable classrooms, encompassing 90,496 square feet of additional space available for instruction. The tables below summarize existing K-12 permanent and portable classroom capacity. See also Appendix B for detail by school building. Table 1 -Existing Permanent and Portable Capacity by Grade Level FACILITY ELEMENTARY HIGH SCHOOLS TOTAL (K-12)TYPE SCHOOLS MIDDLE SCHOOLS Total TotalTotal Total Capacity/Permanent to Capacity/Permanent to Capacity/Permanent to Capacity/Permanent to Portable PortablePortable Portable 4,458 97.97% 15,342 89.02%PERMANENT 7,449 85.61% 3,435 86.22% 92 2.03% 1,892 10.98%RELOCATABLE 1,252 14.39% 548 13.76% TOTAL 8,701 100.00% 3,984 100.00% 4,550 100.00% 17,235 100.00% AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Table 2 -Inventory and Capacity of Permanent Facilities PROGRAM NAME LOCATION AREA (ft?) CAPACITY Benson Hill 18665 116th Ave. SE, Renton, 98058 67,533 520 Bryn Mawr 8212 S 118th St., Seattle, 98178 49,157 338 Campbell Hill 6418 S 124th St., Seattle, 98178 57,072 332 Cascade 16022 116th Ave. SE, Renton, 98058 59,164 467 a Hazelwood 7100 116th Ave. SE, Newcastle, 98056 66,161 591 5 Highlands 2727 NE 7th St., Renton, 98056 60,000 547 9 Hilltop Heritage 1075 Duvall Ave NE 98059 79,881 554 a Honey Dew 800 Union Ave. NE, Renton, 98059 54,620 336 z Kennydale 1700 NE 28th St., Renton, 98056 65,169 622 i Lakeridge 7400 S 115th St. Seattle, 98178 52,958 398 S Maplewood Hgts. 130 Jericho Ave., Renton, 98059 56,220 402 a Renton Park 16828 128th Ave. SE, Renton, 98058 65,955 476 m Sartori 332 Park Ave. N, Renton, 98057 76,797 554 Sierra Heights 2501 Union Ave. NE, Renton, 98058 53,992 472 Talbot Hill 2300 Talbot Rd., Renton, 98055 57,844 460 Tiffany Park 1601 Lake Youngs Way, Renton, 98058 58,758 380 Total Grades K-5 Capacity 981,281 7,449 Dimmitt 12320 -80th Ave. S, Seattle, 98178 109,070 794 WY McKnight 2600 NE 12th St., Renton, 98056 126,706 847 —! a SB Nelsen 2304 Jones Ave. S, Renton, 98055 124,234 896 = o Risdon 6928 -116th Ave. SE, Newcastle 98056 133,934 898 Total Grades 6-8 Capacity 493,944 3,435 a Hazen 1101 Hoquiam Ave. NE, Renton, 98059 327,395 1,462 3 Lindbergh 16426 -128th Ave. SE, Renton, 98058 242,662 1,211 © Renton 400 S 2nd St., Renton, 98057 278,373 1,389 2 Talley 7800 S 132nd St., Renton, 98178 70,831 397 oO = Total Grades 9-11 Capacity 919,261 4,458 TOTAL GRADE LEVELS K-12 2,394,486 15,342| 6 Meadow Crest ELC 1800 Index Ave. NE, Renton, 98056 68,752 464 2 = HOME Program -Spring Glen 2607 Jones Ave. S, Renton, 98055 7,008 84 < WW Renton Academy 2607 Jones Ave. S, Renton, 98055 24,805 48 Z Total Instructional Special Use 100,565 596 Total Instructional Facilities 2,495,051 15,938 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) | Facilities Operations Center 7812 S 124th St., Seattle, 98178 21,894 57,200Kohlwes Educational Center 300 SW 7th St., Renton, 98057 16740 -128th Ave. SE, Renton,ia 13,7102 Lindbergh Pool 98058 a Nutrition Services / iB Warehouse 409 S Tobin St., Renton 98057 27,466 & Renton Memorial Stadium 405 Logan Ave. N, Renton, 98057 35,193 20,243a Transportation Center 420 Park Ave. N, Renton, 98057 175,706Total Support Services 2,670,757|Total All Permanent Facilities Undeveloped Property The District currently has the following undeveloped real property in its inventory: Skyway Site S Langston Rd. & 76th Ave. S, Seattle 4.18 Acres AGENDA ITEM #2. d) D IV. ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS The District saw consistent year over year growth between 2011 and 2018. In 2019, enrollment started to decline slightly and, like most school districts, the District’s enrollment was impacted by the global pandemic and temporary closure of in-person learning. The District’s enrollment has continued to decline between 2021 and 2025. Using medium growth projections, the District expects that its enrollmentwill continue to decline approximately | percent each year for the next six-year planning period. Numerous methodologies are available for projecting long-term enrollments. The most common method is known as cohort survival which tracks groups of students through the system and adjusts the populations to accountfor the average year-to-year growth. For example, fourth grade enrollment is adjusted based on the average enrollment trend of the past in order to estimate next year’s fifth grade enrollment. This calculation method considers the past five years’ trends to determine the average adjustmentfactor for each grade, or cohort. The method works well for all grades except kindergarten, where there is no previous year data. For kindergarten, two methodologies are generally used: A linear extrapolation from the previous five years of kindergarten enrollment, assuming thatthere is a trend; or, alternatively, a comparison of the kindergarten enrollmentto births from five years prior can be used to calculate a “birth-to-k” ratio. For example, kindergarten enrollmentin 2025 is divided by the total births in King County in 2020 to produce a birth-to-k ratio. The average ratio for the last five years can then be applied to births in subsequentyears to estimate kindergarten enrollment. The Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction (OSPI) uses the cohort survival method to project enrollments for purposes of the School Construction Assistance Program. The cohort survival method generally works well for Districts that have a consistent trend of gradual increases or declines in enrollment.It is less reliable in Districts where spikes in demographic trends (especially a marked increase or decrease in new housing or other enrollment factors) can lead to dramatic swings in enrollment from one yearto the next. In addition, the use of the linear extrapolation method at the kindergarten level can result in a distorted trend since it does not consider changes in birth rate trends. Combining cohort survival with other information about births, housing, regional population trends, and even trends in service area and private school enrollment can often provide for a more accurate forecast. The District contracts with FLO Analytics to prepare a modified cohort survival projection. The modified cohort survival projection combines the average rollup at existing grades with estimates of growth expected from new housing, as well as assumptions about market share gains or losses that the District is likely to see at certain grade levels. Estimates of housing growth for this model were obtained from building permit information provided by the respective jurisdictions. However, there are many unknowns due to current market concerns in real estate, inflation, and recent changes in government funding and job markets. As a result, and to be prepared for the different scenarios, the District reviews three projections: a low, medium, and high. See Appendix for recent enrollment history and projected enrollment. Projection Methodology: 10 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) || The District reviewed FLO Analytics’ low, medium, and high modified cohort survival projections to determine our enrollment forecast for 2024-2030, and chose the medium scenario as the likely enrollment forecast for this time period. All of these scenarios included a continued decline in enrollment for the District. However, the medium scenario projected an enrollment decline similar to the last five years of enrollment, with slightly less of a decline per year to accommodate the current residential developments in the pipeline for our area. The District will continue to monitor development, move-in/move-outs, and trends within the four-county area to better predict enrollment more than two years out. Table 3 below identifies projected enrollment CHANGE ACTUALOCT.| Soso HEADCOUNT CHANGE 2024 -2030 2024 -2030 (medium) -6.30% (405) 6,027 6,432 ELEMENTARY -4.80% (148) 2,938 3,086 MIDDLE -6.29% (263) 3,917 4,180 HIGH -6.06% (10) 155 165 other/alt -5.96% (826.00) 13,037 13,863 TOTAL Projections through 2030-2031: using the medium growth scenario. Table 3 — Projected Enrollment — 2024 to 2030 11 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) || |||||| ||||| |||||| |||||| ||||| ||||| V. CAPITAL FACILITIES NEEDS AND PLANNING Capacity Needs: When considering the District’s existing permanent capacity as compared to projected enrollment through the 2030-2031 school year, the District shows sufficient capacity in the near term at the elementary, middle school, and high school level. Importantly, the opening of the new Sartori Elementary School in August 2018 and Hilltop Heritage Elementary School in 2023 addressed capacity-specific needs and provides an overall increase in capacity for the elementary grade span, which were identified during 2015 & 2018 long-range planning and Citizens’ Facilities Advisory Committee sessions in preparation for our voter-approved 2016 capital levy (which provided funding to construct Sartori Elementary School) and 2019 capital bond (which provided funding to construct Hilltop Heritage Elementary School). Table 4 compares the District’s permanent capacity (from Table 2) with the six year enrollment projections by grade level (Appendix D). Anticipated capacity additions over the planning period are included in the analysis but are subject to funding and completion. Table 4 -Capacity Analysis: Surplus/Deficit Projections* (2024/25 -2030/31) [ SURPLUS / DEFICIT CAPACITY PROJECTIONS’2024/25 -2030/31 | 24/25* 25/26 | 26/27 | 27/28 28/29 | 29/30 | 30/31 | BLEW K-5 "| PROGRAM CAPACITY STUDENT ENROLLMENT SURPLUS / (DEFICIT CAPACITY) 7,449 6 940 7,449 6,352 1,097 7,449 6,273 1,176 7,449 6,210 1,239 7,449 6,076 1,373 7,449 6,044 1,405 7,449 6,027 1,422 MIDDLE 6-8 PROGRAM CAPACITY STUDENT ENROLLMENT SURPLUS / (DEFICIT CAPACITY) 3,435 3, 3,435 3,194 241 3,435 3,162 273 3,435 3,129 306 3,435 3,057 378 3,435 3,008 427 3,435 2,938 497 HIGH 9-12 PROGRAM CAPACITY? STUDENT ENROLLMENT SURPLUS / (DEFICIT CAPACITY) | 4,458 \ 4,458 4,156 302 4,458 4,012 446 4,458 3,960 498 4,669 3,989 680 4,669 3,939 730 4,669 3,917 752 medium range projection -24/25 and beyond 1. Doesnot include relocatable facilities (portables) High School capacity increases by 211 students in 2028 with Renton HS replacement2. The 2022 voter-approved capital bond provided funding for property acquisition, planning, and construction of a replacement of Renton High School. This project is expected to include added program capacity to address potential enrollment growth beyond the six-year planning period. The project is also intended to replace an aging school building and work towards program equity across the high school grade space atall District high schools. 12 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Additionally, the 2022 capital bond included a building modernization of Hazen High School, including seismic structural updates, safety/security updates, HVAC system updates,finish updates in classrooms, corridors, and the library. This project is eligible for approximately $28.6 million from OSPI — School Construction Assistance Program (SCAP) funding for a building modernization at the secondary school grade level. We are currently pursuing the SCAP funding for this project and it is the only OSPI — SCAP funding that the District is currently eligible to receive. Table 4 does not include planned capacity additions at the middle school level but there is discussion for future bond planning that includes the need to replace both Nelson Middle School and Dimmitt Middle School, based on the age and condition of the school buildings. The District will continue to monitor middle school enrollment growth to determine if additional capacity as a part of these potential projects is needed for growth. It should be noted that the District is also reaching its maximum limit in providing portable classrooms at many of its existing sites due to current land use and building code requirements. For the last six-year period, the District’s highest priorities have been to address existing and projected facility capacity deficits, aging infrastructure at secondary schools, and responding to/planning for both growth and program related added capacity. These projects funded by the 2019 bond, 2022 bond, and impact fees, are projects responding to growth. This has included: Completion of Hilltop Heritage Elementary School, helping to relieve capacity needs in e the Hazen High School service area. With the opening of Hilltop Heritage Elementary School in 2023, the District continues to have available capacity at the elementary level to serve potential enrollment growth. High school additions and/or renovations to create additional science classroom/laboratory space to address changes in State graduation requirements. e Planning for replacement of Renton High School, Dimmitt Middle School, and/or Nelson e Middle School — all aging facilities and potentially impacted by future growth. Acquisition of land for future development. e Addition and or relocation of relocatable classrooms (interim classroom space knownas e portables). Over the next six years the District will continue to implement the projects funded by the votes in the November 2022 bond. These projects include the following capacity and non-capacity projects: e Interior door hardware/lock updates e New key system Capital Construction Plan: Safety & Security 13 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Main entry video intercoms e Entryway improvements to provide front door line-of-sight for office staff e Security camera updates and new installations e e Updated fire alarm and security alarm panels, devices, and systems Update seismic and structural systems in older buildings (retrofitting e and modification of existing structures to make them more resistant to seismic activity, ground motion,or soil failure) Improvements and equipment replacement of school Heating, Ventilation, and Air e Conditioning (HVAC)systems Upgrades to electrical, plumbing, and mechanical systems e Upgrades to boilers and domestic hot water heaters e Replacement of aging roofs at school buildings e Build anew high school facility for the Renton High School service area, providing e a modern learning environment and equitable athletic opportunities for all students. The District’s intent in structuring its capital improvement program is to maintain a constant level of construction throughout the program period to optimize the utilization of its management capabilities. The District utilizes a combination of in-house project management (Capital Planning and Construction Office) and outside managementconsultants to accomplish this. School Improvements Purchase Property Provide for up to forty acres for a Renton High School replacement and the e relocation of our Nutrition Services/Warehouse facility. Build New Renton High School 14 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) VI. SIX-YEAR FINANCE PLAN Funding for planned improvements is typically secured from several sources including voter- approved bonds or capital levies, State Construction Assistance Program funding, and impact fees. Bonds are typically used to fund the construction of new schools and other capital improvement projects and require a 60% voter approval. The District’s voters in 2019 approved a $249.6 M bond measure to fund a new elementary school (Hilltop Elementary School) to accommodate enrollment needs. Sartori Elementary School opened in 2018 as a choice school, providing additional capacity relief. The voters in November 2022 approved a $676 M bond to fund property acquisition and construction of a new Renton High School and security, seismic, and building systems updates at various schools throughout the District. State School Construction Assistance funds come from the Common School Construction Fund. The State deposits revenue from the sale of renewable resources from State school lands set aside by the Enabling Act of 1889 into the Common School Account. If these sources are insufficient to meet needs, the Legislature can appropriate General Obligation Bond funds, or the Superintendent of Public Instruction can prioritize projects for funding. School districts may qualify for State School Construction Assistance Program (SCAP) funds for specific capital projects based on a prioritization system. The District anticipates receiving approximately $28 M in SCAP funding for the Hazen High School Modernization project. Where a district is eligible, impact fees are a means of supplementing traditional funding sources for the construction of public facilities needed to accommodate new development. See Section VII School Impact Fees. The primary funding sources for all capital construction projects scheduled over the next six years include 2022 Bond funds and remaining funds from the 2022 technology/capital levy. Growth driven projects funded by impact fee revenue and 2019 bond funds are nearing completion. The majority of the recent bond funds will be directed towards land acquisition and the replacement of Renton High School. Construction of this school will not begin for two years due to the need to complete land acquisition and site preparation. If enrollment projections change to show that added capacity is needed to accommodate growth at the 9-12 grade level, the District will evaluate including the high school capacity additions as a part of a future impact fee calculation. Capacity adding projects represent only a portion of the district’s total capital improvement plan. Estimated expenditures for capacity projects over the duration of this six-year plan are indicated in Table 5 below. Funding Sources: Finance Plan: 15 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) |||||||| Table 5a— Six Year Finance Plan — Added New Capacity Estimated Expenditures‘ ($1,000,000's) Funding ($1,000,000's) Project 2024-2025-2026-2027-2028-2029-2030-. 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Total Secured? Unsecured? 2 2 0New Elem. School 2 HS Science 0 0 0Classrooms 0 2 2 0Land Acquisition 2 4 4 0portables 4 0 0 0 8 8 0Total 8 0 0 0 1. Estimated expenditures based on total project cost, including hard and soft costs. 2. Secured funding includes 2022 bond monies, and previously collected school impact fees. The District did not receive SCAP funds for the capacity projects identified in Table 5a. Unsecured funds include, where relevant, future school impact fees and potential bond initiatives.3. 16 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) |||||||| Table 5b — Six Year Finance Plan -Projects not Related to Added Capacity Funding ($1,000,000's) Estimated Expenditures' ($1,000,000's) 2030-2025-2026-2027-2028- 2 0 2 9 - 2024-Project 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Total Secured? Unsecured Total 62 97 156 192 64 18 0} 589 589 0 Estimated expenditures based on total project cost, including hard and soft costs. 1. 2. Secured funding includes 2022 bond monies. Includes approximately $28.6 M in WA State OSPI -SCAP funding. 3. Renton High School Replacement & Site Expansion 36 52 102 146 55 18 409 409 0 Hazen HS Modernization? Sierra Heights Secure Entry and Admin Remodel & Seismic Updates 10 5 20 1 20 18 3 71 6 71 6 0 0 Lindbergh HS HVAC & Seismic Updates 1 2 16 20 4 43 43 0 District-wide Safety/Security Updates 2 4 4 2 12 12 0 District-wide Seismic Updates (phase 1) District-wide HVAC Updates (phase I) District-wide Building Envelope and Roof Updates (phase 1) 3 3 2 10 5 3 7 4 3 1 4 1 2 21 18 9 21 18 9 0 0 0 17 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) The GMA authorizes jurisdictions to assess and collect impact fees to supplement funding of additional public facilities needed to accommodate new development. Impact fees cannot be used for the operation, maintenance,repair, alteration, or replacement of existing capital facilities used to meet existing service demands.In the case of public schools, impact fees are assessed only on residential new development. King County and the cities of Bellevue, Newcastle, and Renton currently collect impact fees on behalf of the District. Where applicable, the District calculates its impact fees in conformance with the codes of each jurisdiction. To be eligible to collect school impact fees for new capacity projects, a district must demonstrate expected grade level enrollment growth over the six-year planning period and a related need for new capacity. The school impact fee formula examines the costs of housing new students from growthby using a student generation factor, which indicates the number of students that each type of dwelling produces based on recenthistorical data. See Appendix C for detail on the student generation rates. Other factors used to calculate school impact fees include: Site Acquisition Costs -the actual or estimated cost per acre to purchase property. Building Cost — the actual or estimated cost to construct growth related facilities. Temporary Facility Cost -the actual or estimated cost per classroom to purchase and install a relocatable classroom,including site work and utilities. State Construction Assistance Program Funding Credit -the amount of funding provided by the State, subject to District eligibility, based on a construction cost allocation and funding assistance percentage established by the State. Tax Credit — the estimated amountthat a new homeowner will pay toward the school construction bond primarily funding the capacity improvement, derived from assessed property values, taxation rate, and current bond interest rates. As required by local ordinances, the District’s fee formula incorporates a fifty (50) percent “discount rate,” which operates to set the final fee at 50% of the calculated unfunded need. Table 6 below compares the District’s current impact fee with the recommended 2026 impact fee. VU. IMPACT FEES 18 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) | CHANGE 2026 2025 IMPACT FEES SINGLE-($1,003 $0 $1,003 FAMILY ($3,268) $0 $3,268 MULTI-FAMILY Due to the current projection of no expected grade level enrollment growth at K-5, 6-8, or 9-12, The District intends to monitor the District is not eligible to collect impact fees for 2026. enrollment growth closely and will update the CFP accordingly should the District become eligible for school impact fees in the future. Table 6 — School Impact Fees Effective Proposed January January 19 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) =———=— =——— t APPENDIX A —RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT MAP CES THE™ NMS= . FE aE Remy ae kat Fees Abbreviations Renton School District Map Legend Secondary Schools: Elementary Schools: Dimmitt Middle School OMS Benson Hill Elementary BHE Hazen High School HHS Bryn Mawr Elementary BME i)Renton Ue Bellevue Lindbergh High School LHS Cascade Elementary CES McKnight Middle School MMS Campbell Hill Elementary CHE Nelsen Middle School NMS Honeydew Elementary HDE ee Seatac a Kent Renton High School RHS Hazlewood Elementary HES Risdon Middle School Hilltop Heritage Elementary RMS THS HHE Talley High School Highlands Elementary HLE . Kennydale Elementary KDEKing County ee Tukwila a Lakeridge Elementary LRE Maplewood Heights Elementary MHE i Renton Park Elementary RPE City Limits Newcastle Early Learning & Specialty: Sartori Elementary SAE of Renton Meadow Crest Sierra Heights Elementary MEC SHE Early Learning Center Talbot Hill Elementary THE KC UG —Renton Academ' RAS Park Elementa -Tiffany y TPE Boundary Eyal) ie AGENDA ITEM #2. d) |||| | ||| ||| | |||| | «|| |||| || APPENDIX B — SCHOOL CAPACITY CHARTS Appendix B: Table 1 -Elementary School Capacity FACTORS: Student/Teacher Ratios: Grades K-1 21:1 Grade 2 22:1 Grade 3 24:1 Grades 4-5 29:1 Scheduling Efficiciency 1.00 Program Efficiency 1.00 TOTALRELOCATABLE CLASSROOMSSCHOOL PERMANENT TEACHING STATIONS 2 3 45 SPED JOTHER| CAP TOTAL] K-14 2 3 45 SPED|OTHER| CAP CAPTOTAL] K-1 32 8 3 3 6 4 8 520 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 520BENSONHILL BRYN MAWR 25 7 3 5 0 1 9 338 6 0 0 0 5 0 1 145 483 25 6 2 6 0 2 9 332 8 0 0 a 5 0 0 217 549CAMPBELLHILL 4 0 0 2 96 5634 0 7 3 10 467 6 0 0CASCADE 31 7 2 6 591 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 591HAZELWOOD 32 9 4 4 7 a2 8 4 3 7 2 8 547 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 547HIGHLANDS 0 0 0 5544 6 3 5 554 0 0 0 0 0 22 7 4 4 0 i 6 336 8 0 0 0 6 0 2 174 510HILLTOP HERITAGE 30 8 4 HONEY DEW 9 3 5 8 2 6 622 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 622KENNYDALE 33 5 29 427283986 0 0 0 1 0LAKERIDGE 26 6 3 3 4 26 1 5 2 0 2 6 402 12 0 0 3 9 0 0 333 735MAPLEWOOD HGTS.} 3 A 6 2 1 476 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 476RENTON PARK 32 7 3 7 554 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 554SARTORI 32 8 4 4 6 8 4 3 4 3 7 472 8 0 0 1 3 0 4 111 583SIERRA HGTS. 29 6 { 6 460 5 0 0 2 0 { 2 60 520TALBOT HILL 26 8 3 2 4 0 0 0 3 0 1 87 46727 8 3 3 2 2 9 380TIFFANY PARK 35 121 7,449 65 0 0 13 32 1 49 1,252 8,704TOTAL 460 117 56 54 69 RELOCATABLE CLASSROOMS TOTALLINDBERGH SERVICE PERMANENT TEACHING STATIONS 2 3 45 SPED |OTHER| CAP |TOTAL| K-1 2 3 4-5 SPED|OTHER| CAP CAPAREA TOTAL] K-1 32 8 3 3 6 4 8 520 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 520BENSONHILL 0 7 3 10 467 6 0 0 4 0 0 2 %6 563CASCADE 31 7 4 0 0 47647600 0 0 0 0RENTONPARK 32 7 3 3 2 1 8 3 3 2 2 9 380 4 0 0 0 3 0 1 87 467TIFFANY PARK 27 10 0 0 4 3 0 3 183 2,026122 30 13 9 21 11 38 1,843TOTAL TOTALRELOCATABLE CLASSROOMSHAZEN PERMANENT TEACHING STATIONS 3 45 SPED |OTHER| CAP TOTAL] K-1 2 3 4-5 SPED|OTHER| CAP CAPSERVICE AREA TOTAL] K-1 2 9 4 4 7 2 6 591 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 591HAZELWOOD 32 0 554355540 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 it 4 4 0 1 6 336 HILLTOP HERITAGE 30 8 4 4 6 8 0 0 0 6 0 2 174 510HONEY DEW 3 5 8 2 6 622 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 622KENNYDALE 33 9 26 1 5 2 0 2 6 402 12 0 0 3 9 0 0 333 735MAPLEWOOD HGTS.}| 8 4 3 4 3 7 472 8 0 0 { 3 0 4 111 583SIERRA HGTS. 29 30 0 0 4 18 0 8 618 3,595172 44 24 2 25 13 36 2,977TOTAL TOTALRELOCATABLE CLASSROOMS CAP TOTAL} K-1 2 3 45 SPED|OTHER| CAP CAPRENTON HIGH PERMANENT TEACHING STATIONS SPED|OTHER| BRYN MAWR 25 7 3 5 0 1 9 338 6 0 0 0 5 0 {145 483 25 6 2 6 0 2 9 332 SERVICE AREA TOTAL] K-1 2 3 45 8 0 0 3 5 0 0 217 549CAMPBELL HILL 0 0 0 0 0 54737285470 0 0HIGHLANDS 32 8 4 29 427283986 0 0 0 1 0 5LAKERIDGE 26 6 3 3 4 8 3 2 6 1 6 460 5 0 0 2 0 ¢ 2 60 520TALBOT HILL 26 451 2,5268 40 2,075 25 0 0 .1 1 8TOTAL 134 35 15 19 17 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Appendix B: Table 2 -Middle School Capacity Appendix B: Table 3 -High School Capacity (24:1 @ Talley) Core Classes 29:1 PE 40:1 Band /Orchestra 40:1 Choir 50:1 SPED 12:1 Other 31:1 (24:1 @ Talley) Scheduling Efficiciency 0.80 Program Efficiency 0.90 FACTORS: Student/Teacher Ratios: Core Classes 29:1 PE 35:1 Band /Orchestra 40:1 Choir 50:1 SPED 12:1 Other 31:1 Scheduling Efficiency 0.83 Program Efficiency 0.95 SCHOOL FACTORS: Student/Teacher Ratios: SCHOOL AGENDA ITEM #2. d) J|||||| |||||]|||||||]||| ff||||| | |}||||| |||ff||| || || | SGRs I Students Housing Housing Type K-12 9-12 6-8 K-12 || K-5 9-12 6-8 «-5 Units 0.219 0.065 0.045 0.108 121 36 25 60 553 Single-family 0.214 0.046 0.038 0.131 108 23 19 66 505 Multifamily 0.213 0.043 0.037 |] 0.133 80 16 14 50 376 AptiPlex 0.217 0.054 0.039 jf 0.124 28 7 5 16 129 Townhome Notes APPENDIX C — STUDENT GENERATION RATES (SGR) The formula for determining school impact fees, as established by King County Council Ordinance 11621, requires that school districts provide “student factors based on district records of average actual student generation rates for new developments constructed over a period of not more than five years prior to the date of the fee calculation.” The Ordinance also provides that, in the event this information is not available in the District, “data from adjacent districts, districts with similar demographics, or county-wide averages must be used.” Appendix C: Table 1 -Student Generation Rates by Housing Subcategory (2025) Units built in 2024 are excluded, because they may not have been completed and occupied by October 2024, King County code Title 214.43 defines the housing types as such, “single family units shall mean single detached dwelling units, and multi-family units shail mean townhouses and apartments.” (a) The multifamily category represents all structures with five or more housing units, including the following structure types: apartment, townhome,and plex (i.e., duplex,triplex, and fourplex}. (b) The multifamily Apt/Plex subcategory includes the following structure types: apartment and plex. Sources Renton School District October 2024-25 headcount enrollment. King County GIS parcels and King County Department of Assessments assessor information. Appendix C: Table 2 -Student Generation Rates for Projects with 25+ Housing Units (2019-2023) Housing Type Project Name YearBuilt 1 Bed| 2 Bed| 3 Bed 4 Bed| 5 Bed Units K-5 Students 6-8 9-12] K-12] K-5 SGRs 6-8 9-12 K-12 Apt/Plex Leonard Place} 2019 23 21| 5 o 0 4a 12 3 0 15 ]]0.250} 0.063] 0.000] 0.313 Apt/Plex Oaks 2021 4a] 12} 0] 04 0 60 5 2 3 10 |]0.083]0.033] 0.050] 0.167 Apt/Plex Tenace 2021 73 o o wos 2 1 4 |10.019] 0.009} 0.009 | 0.037 Apt/Plex 2022 32 0 145 0.186] 0.041 0.069] 0.297 Townhome Village 2019 60 0.100 0.033] 0.067 0.200 Farms No. 06 ~ f=. f-P= --32 0,156] 0.063] 0.031 0.250 At Tiffany Park ~f.f->= |. -95 0.074] 0.021} 0.042] 0.137 Terrace ~-= -= 7 -5s? 0.102] 0.051 0.136 0.288 Lake Wash Of Eden ~ ~ ~ ~ -~ 34 0.118] 0.088} 0.059 0.265 Notes Only developments wilh 25 or more unils included. Units built in 2024 are excluded, because they may not have been completed and occupied by October 2024. King County code Title 21A.43 defines the housing types as such, “single family units shall mean single detached dwelling units, and multi-family units shall mean townhouses and apartments.” {a} The multifamily Apt/Plex subcategory includes the following structure types: apartment, and plex (i.e., duptex,triplex. and fourplex). Sources Renton SchoolDistrict October 2024-25 headcount enrollment, King County GIS parcels and King County Department of Assessments assessor information. AGENDA ITEM #2. d) ° Permitted Units 2019-2023 Units in the Pipeline Appendix C: Table 3 -Past & Future Housing Development 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 mi MF 706 5,590 @SF 470 136 Source City of Renton, Planning Division. Prepared by special request, April 11, 2025. Appendix C:Table 4 — Residential Development Details ID Jurisdiction Name Units Notes RI of Renton Renton MF 3,458 TBD R_2 of Renton 800 Renton MF 1,179 1(419 under construction soon R3 of Renton Triton Towers MF 900 TBD R_4 of Renton Solera MF 651 i 2025; 277 affordable units Red) of Renton MF 385 R_6 of Renton 6 MF R7 of Renton Solera Townhomes MF 90 R of Renton Camellia Court MF 72 for 2025 R9 of Renton Grant Place Townhomes MF 36 R_10 of Renton 4th Dimension MF 26 R11 of Renton Towns on 12th SF 90 has not started R 12 of Renton Lakeview Terrace SF 55 R 13 of Renton SF 21 R 14 of Renton Willowcrest Il SF 19 R 15 of Renton Christelle SF 19 recorded R 16 of Renton SF 18 R 17 of Renton Jefferson SF 13 R 18 of Renton VEK on Aberdeen SF 12 R 19 of Renton Emerald SF 10 na Oo SF 15 Total SF 272 Total MF 902 Total Units 7AT4 Notes King County code Tille 21A.43 defines the housing lypes as such, “single family units shall mean single detached dwelling units, and mulli-family units shall mean townhouses and apartments.” SF is single-family and MF is multifamily, which representsall structures with five or more housing units, including the following structure types: opariment, townhome,and plex{i.e., duplex, triplex, and fourplex). Sources City of Renton and King County. AGENDA ITEM #2. d) APPENDIX D —-ENROLLMENT HISTORY AND PROJECTIONS Appendix D: Table 4 -Historical Enrollment by Grade 2018-19 Grade 2018-19] 2019-20] 2020-21 2021-22} 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 to 2024-25 K 1,263 1.097 1,116 1,097 1,022 | | -255 | 1,248 1,213 1,099 1,124 1111 F-| -238 2 1,208 1.216 181 1,099 | -153 3 1,225 1.142 176 116b | -187 4 1,256 1,186 106 1,162 1,172 | -257 5 1,286 1,204 137 |. | 1,137 -140 6 1,236 113 1,052 | : “141 7 1,175 145 1,117 1,043 8 1,125 1,167 1,131 1,078 9 L118 1,123 127 1,110 ‘| 1,131 1,109 106 1,164 iW | 992 973 1,017 1,021 12 980 971 969 1,006 K-12 Total 15,172 14,918 14,433 14,383 14,125 Notes Students enrolled in Running Start full time are excluded from analysis. The lowest and highest enrollment values per grade are highlighted blue and orange,respectively. Sources Renton School District October 2018-19 to 2024-25 headcount enrollment. 2 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) ||| | ff= 2030-31 Grade 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 , 70 oe | . kK 30 1 2 3 4 5 b 7 8 9 os —-1,03 1,0581114 10 | 946 ; 872. s1072 1 | 892 910 : _ 9a 944 dP 2 6,027 6,044 6,076 6,210 6,273 6,352 6,509 K-5 2,938 3,008 3,057 3,127 3,162 3,194 3,143 6-8 3217 3.239 3.289 3.260 4012 4156 A201 212 12,882 12,991 13,122, 13,299 13,447 13,702 13,853 K-12 Appendix D: Table 2 -Enrollment Forecasts by Individual Grade -Middle Scenario Notes Students enrolled full-time in Running Start are excluded from analysis. Darker shading represents higher values and lighter shading represents lower values. Sources Renton School District October 2024-25 headcount enrollment and FLO 2025-26 to 2030-3] enrollment forecasts (middie scenario). AGENDA ITEM #2. d) APPENDIX E —-IMPACT FEE CALCULATION Due to the current projection of no expected grade level enrollment growth at K-5, 6-8, or 9- 12, the District is not eligible to collect impact fees for 2026. AGENDA ITEM #2. d) .RENTON REGIONAL FI REmum;3 mm msxhwnr Loummmly mmugh \rm:7 August 18.2025 City of Renton 1055 S Grady Way Renton,WA 98055 RE:Submission of 2026 Rate Schedule,Capi‘al Facilities P l Distinguished Mayor Pavone. I am writingtopresent Regional Author E AUTHORITY mHaboranon,mnovanon and a [omlnltnwnt to pubhc safe-w, an,and Rate Study for Fire Impact Fees 5 updated Capital Facilities Plan,Rate Study for Fire Impact rees,and our 1016 Hre Impact ree Kate schedule and revision reflects our ongoing commitment to serve the re: and with the highest standard of safety. Ihe Capital racmtles Plan has been meticulously updated and projecrions for the next six years.It outlines our goals and evolve,our Fire Authority remains fully equipped and Mmultaneously,the reVIsea Hre Impact i-ee Kate bcnet requirements and the economic considerations of our cor that the fees are not only fair but also aligned with the services for our growing community. Our objective,in presenting these updated documents,is Schedule as outlined in our agencies’interlocal agreeme RFA.Their inclusion will ensure cohesive planning and com strategic Vision.I believe (his will signmcanny benem o Renton's residents and businesses. I would like to offer our sincere appreciation to the city st; mmrmauon [or the my 01 Kenton.Ine Kenton Regional with (he City of and we deeply value our collabor rewsed Hre Marshal Fee schedule.Ihls comprehenslve sidents and businesses of Renton efficiently.responsively, to encompass our latest assessments,strategic priorities, and initiatives,ensuring that as Renton continues to grow prepared to address emergem and ongoing needs. lule seeks m stnke a balance between our operatlonal nmunity.We have taken a methodical approach to ensure actual costs of providing fire prevention and emergency for them to be incorporated into the City of Renton's Fee nts regarding the city’s collection of fees of behalf of the 'dination between our Fire Authority and the city's broader ur shared goal:the sarety,well-nelng,and prosperity m aff members who worked with our staff to provide growth rvre Authority remains estimates (0 sen/mg In partnersmp a?ve relationship. Thank you for your attention to this important matter.I a‘ integration of our updated plan and rate schedule into tht Respectfu IIy, StevenC h‘eftman Suave Heitman Fire Chief Enc:RRFAResolution 202504 Adopting the Amendec Fees 2026 Fire Impact Fee Schedule (Section XII)and www.re @rento 42572763500 (phone) 425276-9592 (fax) wanyour feedback and am optimistic about the seamless a city‘s comprehensive framework. ICapitai Facilities Plan and Rate Study for Fire Impact lire Marshal Fee Schedule (Section XIII) nlonrfa‘com a 18002 108m Ave SE nrfa Rentun,WA 98055 Page |1 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) RENTONREGION A RESOLUTIO NTHE RENTON CAPITALFACILITIESPLANAND WHEREAS,the Renton Regional Fire Authority " \uurvuu I'Iullubhlllhlll nu§l “nun.ullhvulullluthu uuu u- and high quality of life enjoyed by residents of the R I WHEREAS,the Renton RFA is committed to ensur ,,AAAAAA,A,LA A,,A,A-A J-,,-I-__-__L ___l ___...A.L ...2LI_2..necessary [0 support development anu growm WlInll at the time development occurs without decreasing WHEREAS,the Renton RFA is committed to a ” and emergency service capacity must grow concurre L FIREAUTHORITY N0.2025-04 EGIONAL AUTHORITY RATESTUDYFOR IMPACT FEES ton RFA"has determined,consistent with the State cafphl Prullluuu vaIvLIl runs":‘1 Nu uuL ;v u".”yuan",JUIEIIY' enton RFA;and ing that the Renton RFA facilities and equipment _.._‘-._.--A..._..I U18 Kenton NI'A are auequate I0 SENS GEVBImeEHI current service levels;and Irrency”philosophy to service delivery;meaning ?re ntly with development;and WHEREAS,the Renton RFA recognizes that as the co :be required to adequately meet the growing demant \llllfnl‘?f‘——--1VVI’IEHCHD,UIE HEIIIUII HI’H UBIIEVE)llllpdCl ICE)[JIUV capitai cost of public facilities that are needed to set use the new development;and WHEREAS,the Renton RFA recognizes that in ordertc consistent with the State EnvironmentalPolicyAct a nRFArequiresaCapitalFacilitiesPlan;and WHEREAS,the Renton RFA recognizes that a Cap iadoption,and collection of impact fees under Chapt l WHEREAS,Capital Pla Fees to es'tablishtherates for impectfees in the Cit yRCW82.02.0900). fhp Ivvvu llll-III-l Una,an.II "havuvuv,ulul.un-vv-y- hereby adopts and approves the Renton Regional Fi 'nmunity continues to grow,additional resources will :Ifor services;and .nm.._.‘_&me O IICLCDDGIYLUHIPUIICIIL Ul IUIIUI'IIB[U auuu-nb LIIE ve new development and the people who occupy or J achieve its commitment to concurrency in a manner Idthe State Growth Management Act that the Renton tal Facilities Plan is required for the development, er 82.02 RCW;and n,Renton RFA has developed Rate Study for Impact I of Renton for ?re protection facilities authorized by qua-n.»uvuI v-v-II II.II»IIVI III-\ubv IuI I ..:u-u-v-u.’ re Authority Capital FacilitiesPianand theRate Study for Impact Fees,attached hereto. ADOPTEDby the Governance Board ofthe RENTON of such Board on the 11‘hday of August 2025,the f mg h‘.Manonl. ,m m n W mum Board Member anI"(II VVII’I 3 ,._..My Board Member Beard Member Board Member {EGIONAL FIREAUTHORITYat an Open public meeting Illowing Members being present and voting: Board Mamba! HIM 5%91‘0“" Wag—— Board Member *A“'—«mum.)mum Board Member AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Section XII.Development Fees 2026 d.Five Impact Fees (I)Residential -single family (detected dwelling &duplexes), (ll)Residential -multI-famllv&accessory dwelling unit (ADU) (Ill)Hotel/motel/resort,per room* (IV)Medical care,per bed” (V)Office,per sq foot (VI)Medical/dentaloffice,per sq foot (VII)Retail,per sq foot (VIII)Leisure facilities,per sq foot ‘.wwwuuqmnbw ,.......my. (X)InduskriaI/manufacturing,per sq ft (XI)Church,per sq ft (XII)Education,per student“*“ |(X|||)Special public Vacllmes.per sq1t 2024 2026 perdwelling unit S S 421.58.per dwelling unit 964.53 579.41 5 1,099.68 1.29 346.22 3 669.37 3.92 $2,173.16 mmmm 0.26 S S 3 1,052.00 $0.14 s 0.28 1.99 0.61 1.28 1.25 0.66 1.19 04.0mm 2.36 Ammm 0.42 Ammm 0.90 at}? 0.72 s:0.15 g 0.05 §0.10 S 0.56 S 0.24 S 0.49 $3 S 4.48 S 0.13 S 0.27 **Changed from sq ft to bed in 2023 ”‘Changed from sq ft to student in 2023 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) OFM Feas Section xm.File nepmmem File Malshal Fees (an) a.Fire Plzns Review 8.Inspeniun Fees MSG $24999 W)usuvuu,3599.99 (m)51,000 ,$439939 UV)$5,000 ,$49,999.99 M $50,000 ,$99,999.99 {ij $100,000 and above (VII)Conslvumon Reinspection.Fee is per hourwith a 2 hour mlnimum.The rr with (will)be assessed il me required mspecuon dues nal meexme approval of (VIII)Violation/SecondRarlnspectlon after aaday penud [whenever an days or r since ?re department nullflcatron of a vlulatmn,which required a first rarlnspec! has noxbeen remedied av granted an extension. ux)mm and subseguent rermspecuon «onowp inspection when rerinspedlcn me ?rst and second Ie-inspec?uns. (x)Preventable me alarm fEE' 1.First,second,and third preventable alarms Fourth and fi?h preventable alarms a calendar year,fee is per each alarm 1013-2015 PROPOSED 1026 bau v 1%0!me cost >lb +m ov me cosx $75 +2%onne cost $100 ;2%mm can $200 +15%subs con $250 +1.5%of me can $451:‘11%aflhe (051 $525 «1.1%loe cusK $950 ¢15%?fths (on $1100 «.75%of the cast ‘inimum (may)replace the mspecmv.5175 $100 "are have passed Ian,and such vIu‘a?un 5150 $175 s ave reqmved beyond 5250 $300 N/C $75 N/C $75 3.smh pyevemameexamand sucesslve pveventable alavms m a calendar year,l {xn me payment penany h.Fire Permit Type: mOperztmnal ME code permvl (vssued m acturdante mmSemun 105.5 ufthe | mnhllpfnnrlfarll (m Pevmns rmmabibe mod lacihues ma!have passed a ?re and lile safeky inspe: wisdic?on mat has reopmcity wrlh Renlun RFA (m)Hazardous materials and HFM mums yearly (ADD &'h Filed Storage) {1v}consnucuon peymk w)Hazardous pvodunion malenals permu (for businesses slaving,handlmg,or produztlon materia‘s as regulated .n the ?ve cude]permlt .s yearly (w Undergroundtankremuvarm abandunment rplatE permll {residenllzlj wu,umer requesxea mspecnon wnen not requvveu Dy meme code.ree vs pen 1 hourwhen apploved by me Fire Marshal,such as home daycares. (VII!)NSF madness (x)RFA ledmolugy Surcharge fee apphed m erE Department Fire Marshal Fees, w,V,VI) '35 is pev each alalm $150 $150 $35 $35 Fijeelsvearly on in another $75 $92.50 $150 3315 (M.'ma/N‘”I“M...“mm \H ,1...”mm.y“, minimum $75 “mm,“ mlmmum $100 Jsing hazardous $150 $315 $100 $300 Iouv wvm a mmlumum 5175 $200 $25 $25 subsecnun a.mun, 5%(match COR ram)5% AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Ktl\|IUN Kl‘? ? :IIUI\II-\L I'IKl:AU I I'IUKI I Y IRE ‘TATION16 :ral ITI| 2026—2031 PR‘OFESSIONALISM INTEGRITV . LEADERS F by hnl‘ {1P LOYALTVACCOUNTABILITY RESPECT AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............ 1.1 PURPOSE... (‘ADITAI 1.3 1.4 1.5 DEFINITION OF CAPITAL FACILITIES PRINCIPLESGUIDING CAPITAL INVESTMENTS RRFA HISTORV AND GOVERNANCE... 1.7 CURRENTCONDITIONSAND PROJECTEDGROW’ 2.0 INVENTORY OF EXISTING RRFA CAPITAL FACILITI E 2.2 APPARATUS INVENTORY‘ w555rn 3.0 MEASURING FUTURE CAPITAL FACILITV NEEDS 3.1 LEVELOF SERVICEMEASURES.... FORECAST OF FUTURE 2026-203 4.1 APPARATUS FACILITYNEEDS 4.2 STATION FACILITYNEEDS“ 4.3 PROPOSED LOCATIONSANDCAPACITIESOF E 5.0 CAPITAL FACILITIES REVENUE ANALVSIS.... 5.1 OVERVIEW ..... 5.2 FUNDING THE CAPITALFACILITIESPLAN. AbbUMP I IUN>.. FIREIMPACT FEES OPERATING TRANSFER SIXVVEARCOST AND REVENUECOMPARISON 3./PULILV UP I IUN)ANU UI HtK I-UNUINu >UUKLI: APPENDIXA:AMORTIZATION SCHEDULE..... APPENDIXB:MAJOR REPAIRAND REHABILITATION FOR APPENDIXC:FIRESTATION 11 DRIVETIME (AIDUNIT)...... .........................................................................................22 .........................................................................................23 ANDEDOR NEW CAPITALFACILITIES...............................25 ....................................................................................26 .........................................................................................26 .........................................................................................26 ....................................................................................29 {TATIONS ......................................................................30 ....................................................................................32 APPENDIX D:FIRESTAHON 12-13 DRIVETIME (LADDERS). ... APPENDIXE:FIRESfATION 16/WAREHOUSEBUILDING PR E ....................................................................................33 ILIMINARYDESIGN.........................................................34 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Table of Exhibits Exhibit 171.Service Area and Station Locations .......... Exhibit 1-2.Service Area Population and Projected G Exhibit 2-1.Fire Station Inventorym. Exhibit 2-2.Engines in RRFA Flee! , Exhibit 24.Aid Units in RRFA Fleet Exhibit 25.Hazardous Materials Vehicle in RRFA Fle Exhibit 2—6.Brush Trucks in RRFA Fleet ....................................................................................................10 Exhibit 2-7‘Command Vehicles in RRFA Fleet........... ....Exhibit 2-8‘Dive Apparatus in RRFA Fleet ............... ...... Exhibit 2-10‘Staff Vehicles in RRFA Fleet ............... ......Exhibit 2711.Utiliky Vehicles in RRFA Fleet ................... Exhibit 2712.Small Utility Vehicles in RRFA Fleet ...... ...Exhibit2713.Other Apparatus/Equipment in RRFA FI E 3-1.Cost Use Exhibit 3-2.Response Time Level of Service Standard: Exhibit 3-3‘2024 Response Time Level of Service Stan Exhibit 3-4.2024 Response Time Level of Sen/ice Stan Exhibit 3-5.City of Renton 2024 PC Rating .................. Exhibit 3—6.Fire Station 11 Ladder with 2.5 Road Mil Exhibit 3—7.Highlighted City of Renton Planned Devel ................................................................................11 ................................................................................11 ................................................................................12 ................................................................................12 ................................................................................13 eet ............................................................................13 16 ;...............................................................................17 dards for Fire/Other................................................17 dards for EMS .........................................................17 ................................................................................18 e Radius ....................................................................19 )pment ....................................................................20 Exhibik 471.Capikal Costs for Apparatus,202672031 Exhibit 42.Capital Facility Costs for Stations,202672( Exhibit 473.Fire Station 16 Exhibit 5-1.Projected Dedicated Capital Revenues an Exhibit 5-2.Estimated Capital Facilities Revenuesand ................................................................................22 )31 ...........................................................................23 ................................................................................24 d Costs ....................................................................28 Costs,YOE ..............................................................28 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) .L.U IIILIUUULLIUII 1.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) the Renton Regional Fire Authority (RRFA)to ac .,-.growthoverthe next six years (2026-2031)and I elements of the City of Renton (City)and Ki r(“mung rncnlIUCIILIIICDDUUIIUIIDDaIPUIIDICDall“IUIIUIIIS ICDUD is to identify capital facility needs necessary for hieve and maintain adopted standards for levels devalnnmpnr .--.V"..- 5 consistent with the land use and transportation -,._e ”To. lg County comprehensive plans.This CFP also Irma:(m DC.)IUI IPICI I ICI ILaLIUI 1.2 CAPITALPLANNINGREQUIRE IV The Washington State Growth Management A should consist of:a)an Inventory of existing ‘ forecast of the future needs for capital faciliti -expanded or new capital facilities;d)a six-year funding capacities and clearly identified source requirement to reassess the land use element (RCW 367010708”.The GMA requires that all for capital facility needs and thatjurisdictions h ewhennewdevelopmentcomesinormustbe0 1TheCitypreparesaCFPelementaspartofit Interlocal Agreement (ILA)in place between the RRFA’ssix-year plan for fire and emergency ser That allows the City to impose an impact fee,|m| public facilities addressed by a CFP element of a IENTS ct (GMA)requires that a county/s or city’s CFP capltal tacllltles owned by publlc entltles;b)a as;c)the proposed locations and capacities of plan to finance capital facilities within projected -,s of public money for such purposes;and e)a if probable funding falls short of existing needs capital facilities have ”probable funding”to pay ive capital facilities in place and readily available ‘sufficient capacity when the population grows. s comprehensive plan.in accordance with the ‘City and the RRFA,the City will incorporate the Vices facilities into its comprehensive plan CFP. oact fees may be collected and spent only for the comprehensive land use plan adopted pursuant to the GMA (RCW 82.02.050 (4)). Levels of service (LOS)are established in the CFP am “ML“,LMAmeyme.n.>Lu||uu|u>catuunancu uy u“: the RRFA service area at a certain levei of qualii As the population grows,it is expected that der WIII EISO grows HUUIIIOHEI TECIHEIES W||I De NECESSI standards are influenced by local citizens,elec standards,mandates,and other considerations, Growth,LOS standards,and a funded capital im case where the LOS cannot be met by a service Capital Facilities Plan 7 August 2025 and represent quanti?able measures of capacity. 0"”min,”(Mnnu.r\w meuc may“.munues mm 3:.v...“w :y and within the financial capacity of the RRFA. nands for fire and emergency response services ary (0 meet (HIS growlng uemancl TUr SEerCE.LU) ted,and appointed officials,national and state such as available funding. provement program are to be in balance.In the l or facility,the jurisdiction could do one of the AGENDA ITEM #2. d) following:1)add proposed facilities within f lmanannmanq-ucmunu manage-”cm allatcsvca,a,.uweu mu 3. use plan. 4.4 ”Ln-unvuu.Vn...n._.n\,.._. The CFP addresses public facilities necessaryfor Capital facilities generally have a long useful buildings,land,equipment,and apparatus.Ca operation and maintenance,but it does include facilities.The RRFA considers capital assets to estimated useful life of more than one year. Jnding resources,2)reduce demand through “New,“has;I’m; uulua,~91.“a):Elku ,u:4,Huang:we .anu ...__a providing fire and emergency response services. ife and include RRFA-owned and/or -operated pital facilities planning does not cover regular major repair,rehabilitation,or reconstruction of be assets of more than $5,000 in value and an 1.4 PRINCIPLESGUIDINGCAPITA LI are two guiding procedures (SOP)that define fiscal policies and SOP Z317 "Long-Term Planning"address the (‘FP <|mnnrf< effort. RRFA intends to use the CFP as: a tool for budgeting; the basis for capital spendingg .V,n...m.up...”um..a useful guidance document f0 Toward that end,RRFA has developed and used before adding them to the CFP: iNVESTMENTS planning:operating the GMA.RRFA SOP 2315 "Reserve Funds"and RRFA's policies regarding capital reserves and '<|mnnrf ~._~\.°.v vurrl~ul ....-_,.,...-...,_,~.._-.-mr'r'v.-.u..- giving a degree of assurance about how public r leadership and staff. the following guidelines to evaluate projects Growth-related project costs 5 }fire impact fee revenues, ”-1--.-u-..m...-n.n...b.“ revenues available through ope Projects should be spaced to al n:nnri:|l\l ..Fh 1.5 RRFAHISTORYANDGOVERN AI Ine Kenton Regional Hre Authority (KKrA)IS 5 emergency medical services within the City of R :King County Fire District 40 (KCFD40),It was of approval of Proposition 1 by voters in both the ( Capital Facilities Plan 7 August 2025 iould be timed to match with available remitted zrating transfers. low for progress on RRFA’s other financial goals, )I any! \ICE l speCIaI purpose district that prowdes tire and anton,King County Fire District 25 (KCFDZS),and icially established on July 1,2016,following the .Ity and KCFDZS.This measure created the RRFA 5 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) and authorized the use of a fire benefit charge t ! Before RRFA’s formation,fire services were p (RF&ES)within the City,while both KCFDZS protection.The establishment of RRFA consolid a single regional authority.The contract for ser and renewed in 2022 for an additional 20 years. an»:uu Julv ;,LVLJ,.uuuwm5 me pubbase u.rlvpu annexed into the RRFA on a permanent basis. considered part of the RRFAfor the purposes of 1,6 0 fund operations. rovided by Renton Fire &Emergency Services and KCFD4O contracted with the City for fire ated fire services for the City and KCFDZS under vices with KCFDAOwas transferred to the RRFA :lllUll ;uy I\\.ru-¢v vuLch,I\\4I'IJ‘1U Wu)ullluany As a result,both KCFDZS and KCFD40 are now this Capital Facilities Plan (CFP). RRFA is located atthe south end of Lake Washin, King County GIS data,the RRFA’s total respons Renton and KCFDZS (27 square miles)and the | KCFDZS is located in the area east of the City a Renton Highlands.KCFD4O and Lake Young:are State Route 169 known as Fairwood.The RRFA of King County,as well as the cities of Kent,Tuk 'a few miles northwest.Exhibit 1-1 presents a ma Exhibit 1-1.Service Area and Station Locations gton,between Seattle and Tacoma.According to re area is 37 square miles,including the City of (CFD40 and Lake Youngs area (10 square miles). nd north of State Route 169 known as the East located in the area east of the City and south of ervice area is bordered by unincorporated areas wiia,and Newcastle,with the City of Seattle just p ofthe RRFA service area and station locationsr I_____.—l Capita|Facilities Plan 7 August 2025 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) 1.7 CURRENTCONDITIONSAND P Renton is the fourth largest city in King Coun' estimated 2024 population of 108,584,The G 1industrialbase,and a growing commercial/ manufacturing area were designated as a regio Council (PSRC)in 1995.The northern part ofthel and emphasizes mixed use and regional emplo‘ Plant and The Landing,3 significant recent retail of the regional growth center includes the Downtown Renton has seen investment in rec Center and Piazza Park,the Renton Transit Cente {OJ ECTEDGROWTH ty,covering 23.54 square miles and having an :y includes residential neighborhoods,3 strong ice sector.The City’s downtown and northern nal growth center by the Puget Sound Regional 'egional growth center borders Lake Washington yment,including the Boeing Company’s Renton and residential development The southern part iowntown core and adjacent residential area. rent years,including the Renton Pavilion Event :r,the IKEAPerforming Arts Center,Top Golf,the Hyatt,and Southport.The City also contains extensive single-family neighborhoods,KCFDZ ElocatedinKingCountyoutsideofRentoncity li Population projections for Renton,KCFDZS,and in Exhibit 1-2‘1 The City is expected to grow [ 1 growth forecasted for the RRFA service area. Exhibit 1-2.Service Area Population and Projecl Description 2024 City of Renton 108,58- KCFDZS 7,725 KCFD4O Total Service Area 138, commercial corridors,multi-family nodes,and i and KCFDAO mostly contain residential areas iits. KCFD40 for the years 2025-2031 are presented ‘y 9,405 residents,87%of the total population :ed Growth Projected Growth 20252031 9,405 City of Renton Share of Population Growth 1 Suuvce:Source:City of Ramon projections are from PSRC,KCFDZS and Capital Facilities Plan 7 August 2025 87% KCFDACIare [mm the Office of Financial Management {OFML AGENDA ITEM #2. d) ')In|lnn+n|n1 L.U IIIVCIILUI y UI LAIDLHIS I' This section provides a current inventory of ca pit KRI-A,Including both stations and apparatus. 2.1 BUILDINGINVENTORY Exhibit 1-1 in Section 1 maps the locations and RRFA.Exhibit 2-1 provides station locations and Exhibit 2-1.Fire Station Inventory )DEA Eqn \\l I"MGPILGI I GLIIILICD al facilities that are either owned or operated by twnership ofthe seven fire stations operated by square footage operated by RRFA. Station Address ”a““117 ’111AAIAACD-..rue oLauun ;.r 4;;mm Ave a,nun Fire Station 12 (Ex EOC)3 1209 Kirkland Ave Fire Station 13 18002 108th Ave S Fire Station 13 Shop 18002 108th Ave S I Fire Station 14 1900 Lind Ave SW, Fire Station 14 Tower 1900 Lind Ave SW, Fire Station 15 1404 N 30th St,R Fire Station 16 12923156th Ave Fire Station 17 14810Petrovit Building Square Footage Operated by RRFA um,vvn yous:LU,JDU \IE,Renton,WA 98056 14,800 Renton,98055 5,Renton,WA 93055 6,000 Renton,WA 98057 13,559 Renton,WA 98057 3,658 nton,WA 98056 7,497 Renton,WA 93059 7,732 id SE,Renton,WA 98058 6,836 2 Fire Slatian 1115 owned bythe City of Ramon and leased to RRFA.Th :3 Fire S‘anon 12 vsawned by the my of Kenton and leased to (he mm is unlvzed by my of Renmn Emergency Management. Capital Facilities Plan 7 August 2025 e hmldiug square footage excludes the avea leased by KC Medics. The building square lomage excludes (he pamon 0f the building that AGENDA ITEM #2. d) 2.2 APPARATUSINVENTORY The RRFA maintains a wide variety of highly spet protect the community it serves.Inventories materials vehicles,brush trucks,command v1 vehicles,utility vehicles,small utility vehicles, Exhibits 2-2 through 2-13. Exhibit 2-2.Engines in RRFA Fleet Statian/Vehicle Call Number Sign Veer Mak: Ass gnmem :ialized apparatus in order to fulfill its mission to of RRFA engines,ladders,aid units,hazardous ahicles,dive apparatus,service vehicles,staff and other apparatus/equipment are shown in Model Replacement Vear Est.Cast in Vear of neplacemem m.-1,.....u A.“ L'Lll F085 E414 Station 14 2005E- Ol‘F093 E412 Station 12 2008 E- F114 E313 Station 13 2015 E- OI‘ F115 E314 Station 14 2015 E- F123 E311 Station 11 2017 E- OI‘ F124 E312 Station 12 2017 E- Ol‘ F137 E316 Station 16 2019 E- Ol‘ 2022 PIE R! F145 [:514 Nation 14 mu PltKl F2515E316 Station 16 200E- u.\.yuu.n: IE Cyclone ll IE Quest 2026 $1,790,964 IE Cyclone II 2031 IE Cyclone Il 2031 $2,076,218 IE Cyclone n 2033 $2,202,660 IE Cyclone H 2033 $2,202,660 IE Cyclone|l -t tntorcer £058 §£,bb$,4¥b IE Cyclone II 2026 $1,790964“ Q7 Yl—Ivv".vv Capital Facilities Plan 7 August 2025 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Exhibit 2-3.Ariel Ladder Inventory Vehicle Call Station/Division Number Sign Assignment Year M I F105 L311 Station 11 2011 E- F135 L311 Station 11 2019 E- C r..|_=n_:._ :xnlult L-a.Alu Unit:“KPH I'IEEI Vehicle Call Station/Division Number Sign Assignment Year M E F110 A313 Station 13 2014 I Replacement Est.Cost in VearakaModelYearofReplacement )NE Aerial 2029 $3,092,898 )NE CycloneII 2037 $2,915,353 Replacement Est.Cast in YearIkeMOdEIYearofReplacement TE NorthStar 2025 $526,713 A312 Station 12 2014 I N F111 F138 A311 Station 11 2020 F0 F153 A313 Station 13 2022 F0 F154 A312 Station 12 2022 F0 F440 A317 Station 17 2022 F0 Exhibit 2-5.Hazardous Materials Vehicle in RR Vehicle _Station]Division Number Call Sign A ment l-lZU HlVldl4 branch 14 101/hi Exhibit 2-6.Brush Trucks in RRFA Fleet Vehicle Station]D'' TE Nor‘thStar 2025 RD F-450 2032 RD F-450 2034 $687,241 RD F-450 2034 $687,241 RD F-450 2034 $687,241 A Fleet Model Replacement Year Est.Cast in Vear of Replacement )ne Heightllner 405 /51,050,410 Replacement Est.Cast in Vear Number F091 BR317 Station 17 2008 F t l'lhb bKélb btatlon lb [Ull H F158 BR317 Station17 2024F : Capital Facilities Plan 7 August 2025 axe muuel Vear of Replacement )rd F-SSO not scheduled $0 )rd )rd f-bbU F-550 2039 [01/>:at:490 $579771 10 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Exh''t 2-7.Command Vehicles in RRFA Fleet Vehicle Station]Division Number Call Sly.Assignment Vear Makl F109 B413 Station 13 2013 Chevrc F119 B312 Station 12 2016 Ch evrF121C312Station132017Chevrc F122 C314 Station 13 2017 For c F125 5313 Station 13 2018 Chevrc F134 C313 Station 13 2020 For Replacement Est.Cast in Year 3 Model Vear of Replacement nlet Tahoe not scheduled $0 Ilet Tahoe 2027 $140 177 l Explorer 2027 $140,177 nlet Silverado 2028 $144,382 Explorer 2030 $153 175 F139 C311 Station 13 2020 F orF156TBDStation112023C Exhibit 2-8.Dive Apparatus in RRFA Fleet 5nNumber Assignment F129 DIV312Station 12 2018 Exhibit 2-9.Service Vehicles in RRFA Fleet Vehicle Call Station/Division EMS 2019Fo r 7(17: I L—Il uru\.ll_I—IVIJ LULJ l Explorer 2030 $153,175 2033 $167,378 Replacement Est.Cast in Year ”.4“an:Ivlwcl Year of Replacement am 5500 2039 $589,305 Replacement Est Costin Vear (e Vear of Replacement d F-150 Pursuit 2029 $126,598 J.JU ul Juli.LUJ—l ‘IJ._I'L,_I'UU Capital Facilities Plan 7 August 2025 11 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Exh''t 2-10.Staff Vehicles in RRFA Fleet Vehicle Call Station/Division Number Sign Assignment Year Makl F096A N/A OFM 2009 For: 2012 For: F116 N/A Administration 2016 For: 2015 For c 2018 For: F127 N/A OFM 2018 For: Replacement Est.Cast in Vear 3 Model Year of Replacement l Escape not scheduled $0 1 Escape 2033 F128 N/A OFM 2018For: F130 N/A OFM 2020 For c F143 N/A OFM 2020 For: F144 N/A OFM 2020 For: [Arr "In v vun. F146 N/A SupportServices 202For: F147 N/A SupportServices 2020For Exhibit 2-11.Utility Vehicles in RRFA Fleet Vehicle Call Station]Division Number Sign Assignment Vear M E F066 N/A SupportServices 1999 G I Escape 2033 $58,515 l Escape 2035 $62,078 pagwb $62,078 ReplacementkMdlIE02Year /|C Savana not scheduled F113 N/A OFM 2015 D0 : F132 N/A SupportServices 2019 F F133 N/A SupportSerVIces 2019 F 0 'stration 2020 ChevF140N/A Adm F151 N/A SKCFTC 2021 F 0 F152 N/A SKCFI'C 2021 F 0 N/A Support SerVIces 2019 202‘!C“ ?!F o Capital Facilities Plan 7 August 2025 :lge Promaster2030 $98 014 rd F-250 2034 $110,316 rd F-150 2036 $117,034 rolet _. rd F-350 notscheduled $0 12 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Exhibit 2-12.Small Utility Vehicles in RRFA Fleet Vehicle Call Station]Division Number Sign Assignment Year Make F131 N/A PublicEducator 2020 Ford F142 N/A ITVZ 2020 Nissan Exhibit 2-13.Other Apparatus/Equipment in R R "gum- Number Sign Assignment Vear Make Replacement Est.Cast in VearModelYearofReplacement Transit Connect 2035 $68,482 NVZOOS 2035 $68 482 NVZODS 2035 $68,482 :FA Fleet L...Lu; of Replacement Model F092 N/A N/A 2007 F094 N/A N/A 2008 F101 N/A N/A 2008 Club F103 N/A N/A 2008 PLRS F118 N/A N/A 2016 EZLD “F150 N/A N/A 200595 Trailer22Ft not scheduled$0 not scheduled $0 Inteltrak not scheduled $0 Spirit 2025 $129,548 2026 $29,992 2025 5,11.’ Capital Facilities Plan 7 August 2025 13 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) ':-KEN IUN Ktl N6*63%a'3; 9, :IIUNAL l'IKI:I-\U I I'IUKI I Y 4:29" KAI I:bl UUY I'UK 2026-2031 WWW.RENTONRFA.COM PROFESSIONAHSM INTEGRITY LEADERS}- IIVIPAL I I'ttb HP LOYALTY ACCOUNTABILITY RESPECT AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCI'ION 1.1 FIREIMPACT FEERATESCHEDULE“, (TI 2.0 STATUTORY BASIS... 2.1 STATUTORY REQUIREMENTSFOR IMPACT FEES . 3.0 FIRE IMPACT FEE METHODOLOGV 3.1 SERVICEAREA 3.2 DATASOURCES ANDROUNDING |F\IF| 3.4 CAPITALCOST OF RESPONSE CALCULATIONS. 3.5 CAPITALPROJECTS ELIGIBLEFOR IMPACT FEES. .3.6 IMPACT FEE RATE ADJUSTMENTS APPENDIXA:CURRENT KEVDEVELOPMENT MAP..... AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Table of Exhibits Exhibit 1-1.2024 Fire Impact Fee Rate Schedule... Exhibit 371.Renton Regional Fire Authority Service Area an Fyhih 2,7 Exhibit 3-3.Apparatus Inventory and Emergency Response: Exhibit 34.Building Inventory and Building Square Feet pe Exhibit 3-5.Annualized Apparatus Cost in 2025.. Exhibit 3-6.Apparatus Costs per Response. Exhibit 37.Annual Fire/Otherand EMS Incidents Exhibit 38.Fire/OtherResponses per Incident by ApparatL ...........................................................................................6 d Stations ........................................................................14 s 2024 ...............................................................................18 r Incident 2024 .................................................................19 .........................................................................................21 .........................................................................................22 .........................................................................................23 IS Type ..............................................................................24 Exhibit 39.Apparatus Cost per Fire/OtherIncidenL... Exhibit 3-10.StaffVehicle and Other Equipment/Apparatu: Exhibit 3-11.Annualized Station Cost Square Foot Exhibit 3712.Station Cost per Inciden Exhibit 3-13.Fire/OtherIncidents by Location txnlmt 5714,rue/utner Inclaents BI )peclnc Lana Uses .... ..Exhibit 3-15.Fire/OtherIncidents in Roads and Streets -Al| Exhibit 3716.Total Fire/O‘herIncidents by Land Use Exhibit 3-17.Annual Fire/OtherIncidem Rate by Land Use. Exhibit 3718.Engine Cost of Response to Fire/OtherIncide l Exhibit 3719,Ladder Cost of Response to Incide Exhibit 3-20.Aid Unit Cost of Response to Fire/OtherIncid : Exhibit 3721.Hazardous Materials Vehicle Cost of Respons1 Luu's"‘:n‘:muuuo14.mu>n uuux LUNJJI n=>pull>=lu rIIE/Umel n un».,« .........................................................................................24 5 Cost per Incident ............................................................25 26 .........................................................................................27 .........................................................................................28 ocated to Land Uses ........................................................30 .........................................................................................31 .........................................................................................32 1ts,per Unit of Development ...........................................34 nts,per Unit of Development ...........................................35 ants,per Unit of Development 3 (o Fire/OtherIncidents,per Unit of Development ..... ”an nu mum:Wu u.“capul 1::w .”qu Exhibit 3724.Dive Apparatus Cost of Response to Fire/ 0thzExhibit3-25.Service Vehicle Cost of Response to Fire/ Exhibit 3726.StaffVehicle Cost of Response to Fire/OtherI r Exhibit 3727.Utility Vehicle Cost per Fire/Otherincident,pl Exhibit 3-28.Small Utility Vehicle Cost of Response to Fire Exhibit 3-29.Other Apparatus/Equipment Cost of Respons Exhibit 3730.Fire Station Cost of Response to Fire/OtherIn - Fyhihit 2,21 Fyamnln Residenual Dwelling Unit Exhibit 3—32.Total Capital Cost of Response to Fire/ Otherl mum,ycl mum.vcvclvyul 3r Incidents,per Uni(of Development” ‘r Incidents,per Unit of Development“ Icidents,per Unit of Development, 3r Uni‘of Development.. Other Incident,per Unit of Development e to Fire/OtherIncident,per Unit of Development. dent,per Unit of Development, (inalanzmilv ncidents,per Unit of Development ..................................48 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Exhibit 3733,EMS Response per Incident Rate by Apparatu {‘an A .4.”n.“”4.“qu w“,M k...“ Exhibit 3735.EMS Incidents by Location Exhibit 3-36.EMS Incidents at Specific Land Uses Exhibit 3737.EMS Incidents in Roads and Streets * AiiOCEtEI Exhibit 3738.Total EMS Incidents by Land Use Exhibit 3-39.Annual EMS Incident Rate by Land Use Exhibit 3740.Engine Cost of Response to EMS Incidents,pe Exhibit 3—41.Ladder Cost of Response to EMS Incidents,p6 (Inst Exhibit 3-43.Hazardous Materials Vehicle Cost of 5 Type ...............................................................................49 j to Land Uses ..................................................................53 .........................................................................................54 .........................................................................................55 ‘r Unit of Development.... :r Unit of Development eto EMS per Unit of Development Exhibit 3-44.Brush Truck Cost of Response to EMS Incidenl Exhibit 3745.Command Vehicle Cost of Response to EMS I r txmmt J-ub.UlVe Apparatus Lost 01 Response m th inCK Exhibit 3-47.Service Vehicle Cost per EMS incidem,per Un Exhibit 3748.Staff Vehicles Cost of Response to EMS Incider Exhibit 3-49.Utility Vehicle Cost of Response to EMS Incid s Exhibit 3-50.Small Utility Vehicle Cost of Response to EMS Exhibit 3-51.Other Apparatus/Equipment Cost of Response Exhibit 3752.Fire Station Cost of Response to EMS incident Exhibit 3-53.Example of Calculation of Total Cost of Respt Dwelling Uni Exhibit 3-54.Total Capi‘al Cost of Response to EMS Incider Exhibit 3755,Total Cost of Response to All Incidents by Le n C.An.—umuu :10.mm om um:med rupulduull auu rlujtutu \ 5,per Unit of Developmen Icidents,per Uni(of Development. 1ents,per Unit or Uevelopment .......................................hi it of Development ............................................................64 1t,per Unit of Development .............................................65 ant,per Unit of Development... Incident,per Unit of Developmemm >to EMS Incident,per Unit of Development ,per Unit of Development ...............................................69 )nse to EMS Incidents for a Single-Family Residential .........................................................................................70 Its,per Unit of Development ............................................71 d Use Category .................................................................72 7’)JIUWLII... mm.“r c.“pun,.m.r1 4:.m:n.ca Exhibit 3758.Projection of Annual incidents Associated wit Exhibit 3-59.Baseline Front-Line Apparatus Responses per Exhibit 360.Projected Apparatus Need Associated with C i Exhibit 3761.Impact Fee Eligible Costs Associated with Plar Exhibit 3-62.Value of Station Capacity Needed for Growth- Exhibit 3-63.Impact Fee Eligible Costs Associated with Syst Exhibit 3764.Capital Costs for Apparatus,20262031.. (‘nctcv Exhibit 3-66.Impact Fee Eligible Cos‘s Compared to Projeci Exhibit 3767.2026 RRFAFire impact Fee Rate Schedule .... h City of Renton Growth,2031 .........................................74 Incident,2024 .................................................................75 [y of Renton Grow(h,202672031 med Additions «7 Fleet... Related Response Staffing Increases. :em Improvements ...........................................................78 .........................................................................................79 ted Impact Fee Revenues,2026-2031 ..............................81 .........................................................................................82 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) The purpose of this study is to establish the ra Authority (RRFA)for fire protection facilities auI the City of Renton (City),King County Fire Prote Protection District 40 (KCFD40).However,only' on this rate study. Impact fees are charges paid by new developmel cost of public facilities that are needed to serve or use the new Throughout this st expression to describe anyone who is obligated tes for impact fees in the Renton Regional Fire :horized by RCW 82.02.0900).1 The RRFA serves ction District 25 (KCFDZS),and King County Fire the City will be implementing impact fees based 1t to reimburse local governments forthe capital !new development and the people who occupy the term ”developer”is used as a shorthand to pay impact fees,including builders,owners, or developers. Local governments charge impact fees for sever; to obtain revenue to pay for some of to implement a public policy that he! of facilities that it requires,and that cost of such facilities;and to assure that adequate public faciliti e In £1111,[TIE LIIY completed an Impact TEE transportation,parks,and fire protection.Z in 2 1impactfeeratestudy3whichutilizedmethodol :_«Ma _...4..J:«”4.__ U580 I"HIE LUlJ.>LUUy,Uul UIU IHCIUUE >UHIE approach to measuring level of service and its at the future,as described in Chapter 3.This meth: ”WM”..0.“,.a-..”nu;LLIIIEIIL lclu'::Luuy IUIIUW)Lu:-mm:mun <mdip< 3|reasons: the cost of new public facilities; N development should pay a portion of the cost existing development should not pay all of the as will be constructed to serve new development. I’BIE SIUCIV Ina:Incluaeu ree calculations TOY 317,the RRFA and the City adopted an updated ogy generally consistent with the methodology lellnemenn LU 'EIIECl [HE “KTHS HIE”LUIIEHL )ility to serve growth-related service demands in )dology was utilized again in the 2023 rate study. ,...|....i.¢:~‘.A;1/111m,a:>ulllpuull:,anu anumuuu:u:LII:“uh |tinn<thp rurrpnr levpl of service for the RRFA. IMPACT SCHE Impact fees are paid by all types of new develop development are based on,and vary according' rates TEYIECI GISCOUI'IIS based on avallanle runu shows the fire impact fee rates adopted withint 1 Revised Code of Washmgmn (RCW)vsthe sum law of Washmglon 5m: 1 Henderson,young8.Company.[AugusK26,2011).Rule Study/orlmpac 3 BERK.(Augusx 28,2017).Rate Sfudyfor (Impact Fees,Kenton Regional! 4 The .mpm fee ordinance may specify exempnons for Ioqumme musx be paid far by public money,not other Impad fees,The on remodeling,etc. Rate Study for Fire Impact Fees -August 2025 Iment within the City.4 Impact fee rates for new to the type of land use.Additionally,impactfee s to pay ror Ellglble capital projects.txhlblt 1—1 he City. r FEES,Crly afnenron, 'Ire Aurhomy. musing and/or ”broad public purposes”,m such exemptions linance may specify if impact fees apply to changes in use, AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Exhibit 1-1.2026 Fire Impact Fee Rate Schedule Land Use Unit C:nn|a,[amilu mummy."y ncmumma. Multi-Family Residential Dwelling Unit (d. L Room Medical/DentalOffice Square Foot Fire Impact Fee 1., 1.)$1,099.68 $669.37 $2,173.16 $0.28 Restaurant/Lounge Square Foot Industrial/ManufacturingSquare Foot Church/Non-Pro?t Square Foot Education Student quual rquIL ruumm:Jquul:rum 1.2 STUDYORGANIZATION This rate study includes three chapters. Chapter 1 provides an introduction ar .pu.4/ Id defines the 2026 fire impact fee rate schedule. Chapter 2 summarizes the statutory r and describes how the RRFA’s impact Chapter 3 includes the RRFA service calculating impact fee rates,and the response by unit of development,| projects that are eligible for impact f to account for eligible costs and rutul Rate Study for Fire Impact Fees -August 2025 equirements for impact fees in Washington State :fees comply with the statutory requirements. -,area,level of service used for the purpose of methodology for calculating the capital costs of I also provides a list of growth-related capital ass and final adjustments to the impact fee rates 'e payments or other revenues. AGENDA ITEM #2. d) *""'*1 This chapter summarizes the statutory requirel describes how the RRFA’s impact fees comply w 2.1 STATUTORYREQUIREMENT S The Growth Management Act of 1990 (Chap authorizes local governments in Washington 82.02.110 contain the provisions ofthe Growthh requirements for impact fees. nents for impact fees in Washington State and ith the statutory requirements‘ OR IMPACT FEES ter 17,Washington Laws,1990,1St Ex.Sess.) State to charge impact fees.RCW 82.02.050 » Aanagement Act that authorize and describe the .....Hanan“;”n.1,“....4.u...my."“sum“... Revised Code of Washington as an aid to readel statutes. 2.1.1 Types of Public Facilities Four types of public facilities can be the subje wnlcn may also encompass related transportatl facilities;2)publicly owned parks,open space 4)fire protection facilities (RCW 82.02.090i7)). 2.1.2 Types of Improvements Impact fees can be spent on "system imp development),as opposed to "project improv developer on-site within the development).Imp or operational needs (RCW 82.02.050(5)and R Dnnn'pi-l- .Hu..-...-....u.u...m...”mum...“mum...w .m. '5 who wish to review the exact language of the act of impact fees:1)public streets and roads, on Infrastructure such as nlcycle and pedestrlan and recreation facilities;3)school facilities;and rovements”(which are typically outside the 'ements"(which are typically provided by the act fees can never be used to fund maintenance w 82.02.090(5)and (9)). L.)ucnclu lU ucvclupmcnl Impact fees must be limited to system improvel will benefit new development (RCW 82‘02.050(- reasonable service areas (one area,or more th local government),and local governments mus‘ land uses (RCW 82.02.060). 2.1.4 Proportionate Share Capital improvement costs can be funded using are reasonably related to the new developmen' Costs assessed on a development cannot excee improvements.The impact fee amount shall Rate Study for Fire Impact Fees -August 2025 nents that are reasonably related to,and which 4)(a)and (c)).Local governments must establish an one,as determined to be reasonable by the t develop impact fee rate categories for various ‘mpact fees to the extent that the improvements t and reasonably benefit the new development. d its proportionate share of the costs of system be based on a formula (or other method of AGENDA ITEM #2. d) calculating the fee)that determines the propc y_.v “Np”. 2.1.5 Reductions of Impact Fee Amour Impact tees rates must be adjusted to account I such payments are earmarked for or pro-rat: 82.02.060(1)(b)).Impactfees may be credited f ,I-z, construction provuueu my me ueveloper m su- improvements eligible for impact fees and are r( (RCW 82.02.060(5)). Exemptions Impact rrtionate share (RCW 82.02‘050(4)(b)and RCW Its or other revenues that the development pays m able to particular system improvements)RCW )I'the value of dedicated land,improvements or :n racnmes are In me auopteo er'as system acquired as a condition of development approval) Local governments have the discretion to provi: housing (RCW8202.060(2))other pl early learning center,but all such exempt Tees fee accounts)(RCW 82.02.0608”. 1.4.:vaLIvyLI uyLluHa Developers who are liable for impact fees can that the impacts of the proposed development study (RCW 82.02.0600».Developers can pay i calculations (RCW 82.02.070(4)and (5)),The tie the local government fails to expend or obligat terminates the impact fee requirement,or development (and creates no impacts)(RCW 82 1.1.8 Lapltal racmtles Plans 1e exemptions from impact fees for low-income JbiiC purposes including the development of an us:be paid from punllcrunus (other than Impact submit data and/or an analysis to demonstrate are less than the impacts calculated in this rate mpact fees under protest and appeal impact fee veloper can obtain a refund of the impact fees if e the impact fee payments within ten years,or the developer does not proceed with the 02.080). Impact fees must be expended on public facilitie to reimburse the government for the unused cap to the Growth Management Act of 1990 and mu for current development,capacity of existing additional facility capacity needed for new deve and RCW 82.02.070(2)). 2.1.9 New Versus Existing Facilities impact fees can be charged for new public faci capacity of existing public facilities (RCW 82J limitation described above‘ Rate Study for Fire Impact Fees -August 2025 sin a capital facilities plan (CFP)element or used )acity of existing facilities.The CFP must conform st identify existing deficiencies in facility capacity facilities available for new development,and Iopment (RCW 82.02.050(4),RCW 82.02.060(9), lities (RCW 82.02.060(1)(a))and for the unused 32.060(9))subject to the proportionate share AGENDA ITEM #2. d) 2.1.10 Accounting Requirements The local government must separate the impact money on CFP projects within ten years,ar expenditures (RCW 82.02.070(1)-(3)), 2.1.11 Compliance with Statutory Requ Many of the statutory requirements listed abo presents the calculation of the fire impact fees. in other ways,as described below. 2.1.12 Types of Public Facilities fees from other monies,expend or obligate the Id prepare annual reports of collections and irements for Impact Fees Ie are fulfilled in Chapter 3 of this study,which Some of the statutory requirements are fulfilled This study contains impact fees for fire protecti defines ”fire protection”as fire protection facilit apparatus,and any furnishings and equipment- definition in the Renton Municipal Code (RMC 4 |n general,local governments that are author specmc public Tacmtles for which they may government charge impact fees for private fac public facilities that it does not administer government entltles"(KLW ammuw (In.A Clt an agreement with a regional fire authority (RF !fire impactfees for the RFA A city mayonlycha an agreement WItn me KrA,and me clty S gr?r 1 As part of the RRFA plan,the City and the RRFA :16-116)in which the City agreed to collect the fir the City and the RRFA in 2017 (CAG-lS-OZZ)and on facilities as authorized by statute.The RRFA ies,including but not limited to fire stations,fire that be capitalized.The uses this same 4-190). ized to charge impact fees are responsible for arge such fees.In no Instance may a local ties,but it may charge impact fees for some if such facilities are "owned or operated by y may charge Impact tees for nre and enter Into \)for the transfer,expenditure,and reporting of rge and use impact fees on RFA projects if it has Eterences the “HA er’. entered into an interlocal agreement (ILA)(CAG- e impact fees.Subsequent agreements between in 2019 (CAG-19-022,Adden #1-19)affirmed the City will collect fire impact fees on behalf of the 2.1.13 Types of Improvements The impact fees in this study are based on syster No project improvements are included in this stI Ine pUDIIC racnltles mat can be pala Tor Dy Imp typically outside the development),and ”des community at large"as provided in RCW 82.02. “At un?t.“lwnlcn are [yplCElly provlueu Dy the Developer 0 development),and ”designed to provide servic: are necessary for the use and convenience of th ‘ Rate Study for Fire Impact Fees -August 2025 RRFA,subject to specific requirements. n improvements that are described in Chapter 3, Adv. act tees are system Improvements (wnlcn are igned to provide service to areas within the 090(9)),as opposed to “project improvements” u“ n-SIIE WIInIn (HE uEVEICPmEnI or EUJECEHI ID me a for a particular development project and that e occupants or users of the project”as provided AGENDA ITEM #2. d) in RCW 82.02.090(5).The capital improvements .y?-.......\,..w. Impact fee revenue can be used for the capital c cforoperatingormaintenanceexpenses.The cos! fees include design studies,engineering,Ian :engineering,permitting,financing,administrath casts,and capital equipment pertaining to capit. 2.1.14 Benefit to Development,Prop: Amounts The law imposes three tests of the benefit costs contained in Chapter 3 comply with these )st of public facilities.impact fees cannot be used :of public facilities that can be paid for by impact :1 surveys,land and right of way acquisition, Ie expenses,construction,applicable mitigation al improvements. thionate Share and Reductions of Fee provided to development by impact fees:1) proportionate share,2)reasonably related to (RCW 80.20.050(4)).In addition,the law requin (RCW 82.02‘060(8)). Proportionate Share First,the "proportionate share"requirement me portion of the cost of public facilities that is "re: words,impact fees cannot be charged to pay f0 in existing facilities. Second,there are several important implications not specifically addressed in the law,but which' Costs of facilities that will benefit apportioned between the two group be accomplished in either of two wa I')\ mm cAvauHE we”,v.\g,hulyuluulls new development when calculating i 1eed,and 3)reasonably related to expenditure as the designation of one or more service areas aans that impact fees can be charged only forthe asonably related”to new development.In other r the cost of reducing or eliminating deficiencies of the proportionate share requirement that are follow directly from the law: new development and existing users must be sin determining the amount of the fee.This can vs:(1)by allocating the total cost between new ring w:“m ycl u. mpact fees. .ullu gnaw-.5 m:“a.“uluy w 'Impact fees that recover the costs of government's actual cost.Carrying 5 actual or imputed interest expense. The third aspect of the proportionate share reqL provide adjustments and credits to impact fees, ,: mat [ne amount or me Impact Tee Goes not exce.The "adjustments"requirement redu payments of other revenues (if such the system improvements that are calculated in this study include an a that is used by the RFA to pay for a p Rate Study for Fire Impact Fees -August 2025 existing unused capacity should be based on the osts may be added to reflect the government‘s iirement is its relationship to the requirement to where appropriate.These requirements ensure zecl me propomonate Snare. ces the impact fee to account for past and future payments are earmarked for,or pro-ratable to, needed to serve new growth).The impact fees djustment that accounts for any other revenue ortion of growth’s proportionate share of costst 10 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) This adjustment is in response to th 82.02.0500}. The "credit"requirement reduces improvements or construction provic (‘FP mu,“-..,‘N r..-” required as a condition of developm government from establishing reasc example,the location of dedicated I government. Reasonably Related to Need There are many ways to fulfill the requirement e limitations in RCW 82.02060 (1)(b)and RCW impact fees by the value of dedicated land, ied by the developer (if such facilities are in the rnllprhad ent approval).Thelaw does not prohI it a local mable constraints on determining credits.For nd can be required to be acceptable to the local that impact fees be ”reasonably related"to the development's need for publlc tacclities,includln business enterprise (direct benefit),use by p: services to the fee--payingpropertyor are cu (Indirect benefit),and geographical pI'OleKy (pr are implemented by the following techniques: 'Impact fees are charged to propert facilities‘The RRFA provides fire pr: throughout its service area,therefor of property. The relative needs of different type amounts (i.e.,different impact valu ethisstudyanalyzedfire/otherand E for each type of land use. Feepavers can pay a smaller fee if th elessimpactthanispresumedintheir classification Such reduced needs m “ca g personal use and use by others in the family or ersons or organizations who provide goods or stomers or visitors at the fee-paying property esumed bene?t).lhese measures of re|atedness ies which need (i.e.,benefit from)new public )tection facilities to serve all kinds of property e impact fees have been calculated for all types is of growth are considered in establishing fee is for different types of land use).For instance, iS incident and response data to determine rates 2y demonstrate that their development will have npact fee schedule calculation fortheir property ust be permanent and enforceable (i.e.,via land Mac ycau New...» Reasonably Related to Expenditures (‘ih/v: n-F............-......-..,.”up.-.n..."mum.-. be ”reasonably related”to the development the fee revenue must be earmarked for specific pxnpnriihlrs:hpnpfii the need forthe projects and the portion of the c fees as described in this study.Second,impact fa reauiring Rate Study for Fire Impact Fees -August 2025 r"!v - t paid the impact fee.First,the requirement that uses related to public facilities ensures that datprmininw ...., 'o ost of needed projects that are eligible for impact e revenue must be expended or obligated within 11 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Service Areas for |mpact Fees Impact tees in some jurisdlctions are collected ar than the jurisdiction that is collecting the fees service areas unless such"zones'are necess the development.Because of the compact Slze 0‘ to all properties within the service area,the R Farea,therefore the impact fees are based 0 Dounaarles oY the KKI-A. 2.1.15 Exemptions The City’s impact fee ordinance addresses the s rd expended within serVIce areas that are smaller .Impact fees are not required to use multiple :0 establish the relationship between the fee and rtne KKr-A and the acceSSIbIIIty of Its Tlre TaCIIItIes {FA’s fire facilities serve the entire RRFA service n a single sen/ice area corresponding to the ubject of exemptions.Exemptions do not affect the impact tee rates calculated in this study exempted impact fee must be paid from other impact fee rates to make up for the exemptior account 35 a result OT the exemption. 2.1.16 DeveloperOptions A developer who is liable for impact fees h: developer can submit data and or/analysis to development are less than the impacts calculat the impact fee calculation by the RRFA.If the l payments within ten years of receipt of such pa yimpactfees.The developer can also obtain a re no impacts are created These provisions are ac none of them affect the calculation of impact fe 1.1.1]Lapltal l'aCIlltleS Han Jecause ot the statutory requirement that any public funds.As a result,there is no increase in \because there is no net loss to the impact fee IS several options regarding impact fees‘The demonstrate that the impacts of the proposed ed in this rate study‘The developer can appeal ocal government fails to expend the impact fee Iments,the developer can obtain a refund of the fund if the development does not proceed,and ldressed in the City's impact fee ordinance,and e rates in this study. There are references in RCW to the CFP as the b impact fees.The RRFA published a CFP in Augu 82.02.050 et.seq.pertaining to a "capital faciliti Facilities Plan Element of the City/s Comprehens The requirement to identify existing deficiencie of sen/ice for fire/otherand emergency respons 2.1.18 New Versus Existing Facilities,A |mpact fees must be spent on capital projects c ctoreimbursethegovernmentfortheunused Rate Study for Fire Impact Fees -August 2025 asis for projects that are eligible for funding by st 2025 which fulfills the requirements of RCW es plan".This CFP is referenced in the Capital ive Plan. is,capacity available for new development,and (lmmlnnmnnr,. e.Chapter 3 provides this analysis. counting Requirements mtained in an adopted CFP,or they can be used :apacity of existing facilities.Washington State 12 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) GMA states that an impact fee ordinance ”may (”<me..,.. growth and development will be served by the such fee shall not be imposed to make up f0 060“)“Chanrpr accounts for excess station capacity systemwidi systemwide capacity,impact fees collected can additional growth Impact fee payments that are not expended o unlessthe City Council makes a written findingtf ,IJAL,£,,,£ provide for the imposition of an impact fee for eyfanf.,‘4 “mm“-..,,y.w....w .m..mw...H.”m... previously constructed improvements provided r any system improvement deficiencies"(RCW existing a for serving new growth‘Because of this excess be used to pay for the debt servicing of stations serving r obligated within ten years must be refunded at an extraordinary and compelling reason exists .£..J.L___L..._u__.....‘_._-_._1._.._-___J..C__ u-.._._..__[U nOIU [FIE TEES TDI’longer (nan ten years.IO ver must be deposited into separate accounts of th eimpactfeerevenueandexpenditures.These req UlullldllUU dllu dlU IIUL IdULUI)Ill LIIU Illlpdul.ICU! ITV(nese (WC requirements,Impact Tee revenues agovernment,and annual reports must describe uirements are addressed by the City's impact fee bdlUuIdLIUllb Ill Llll)>Luuy. Rate Study for Fire Impact Fees -August 2025 13 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) 3.0 Fire Impact Fee Meth This chapter describes the methodology used facilities.It begins with a discussion of the sen (nilnulnrl A;.....u w...“u,u u..n.u.....u..u.u...my...u. facili Ies,which are de?ned to include stations, other vehicles).Then a series of calculations ar 3.1 SERVICEAREA ._w..."....-....,m“...,.._.mu“..... .. As noted above the RRFA includes the City,K CI_.______.___ odology :o calculate impact fee rates for fire protection 'ice area considered for the rate study analysis. yum“,u.H...Mathew... equipment,and apparatus (such as engines and e presented to document the methodology for .vu-vy-I lulu.u,nun-v:“as.~yrou 3025 and KCFD40 as shown in Exhibit 3-1.RRFA h.‘_.._;A_____J__:.__.L“- pluvlue:>elv|u¢>w “12>:area)a:une Inlegld areas are owned and/or operated by the R Rconsidersfacilitycostsperunitofdevelopment Exhibit 3-1.Renton Regional Fire Authority Service I mu >y:u-:lll.H FA.Therefore,the analysis in this rate study throughout the entire service area. IdLlllLlE:neeueu LU serve mes: \rea and Stations Rate Study for Fire Impact Fees -August 2025 14 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) While this rate study considers incidents and f: r:|r|||:finn are directly related to anticipated growth with collected in the City are not used to pay for capit KCFDAO, 3.2 DATA SOURCESANDROUNDI I‘ lne data In thls study or Impact was provmed different source is specifically cited.Inventory,i rRRFA’s planning section and reflect condition: Inventory. ilities throughout the RRFA service area when r:nif:|f:ri|ifia( in the City only.This ensures that impact fees al facility costs associated with growth expected by statt trom the thy and the KKI—A,unless a \cident,and response data were provided by the s in the year 2024 for incidents and 2025 for The data in this study was prepared using compl study,there may be very small variations fro calculator based on the same values presented. that the spreadsheet software calculates results in the tables of these reports.The calculation accuracy of the end results but causes occasion: appears in this study‘ 3.3 LEVELOF SERVICE The need for fire protection facilities is influence call loads,geographical area,land use develop standards of the National Fire Protection Associ Bureau. RRFA measures level service (LOS)from cost 01'TaCIIItIES Tor InCICIent response per unit 01 ' {-Ilrnnlli-{-Imnc Jter spreadsheet software In some tables in this m the results that would be obtained using a The reason for these insignificant differences is to more places after the decimal than is reported to extra places after the decimal increases the II minor differences due to rounding of data that ed by a variety of factors,such as response time, ment,topographic and manmade barriers,and ation and the Washington Surveying and Rating ee different perspectives.The first concerns the -|.--|development.lhe second perspectlve concerns mi»; “mum.allu Icapvllac concerns the Protection Class rating for eacl rKCFD40).This study focuses on the first perspe rcp Inc)In uknuluulluc v For the purpose ofquantifying the need for firef of apparatus and stations to incidents.To mea inventory and incident data.For apparatus,the an acceptable LOS,and there are no deficienci eandthereforemoreapparatuswillbeneeded tc For stations,LOS is measured in two different w used for apparatus by measuring using the ral Rate Study for Fire Impact Fees -August 2025 nu:cammuucu puny.m:uum gasps-4w: I of the areas served (the City,KCFDZS,and Ictive,the latter two are addressed in the RRFA acilities to serve growth,this study uses the ratio sure this ratio,this study analyzes both facility current ratio of apparatus to incidents provides as.A5 growth occurs,more incidents will occur, ,maintain this standard. ays,The first approach mirrors the LOS standard :io of station square footage to incidents‘This 15 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) approach accounts for the systemwide demand: Hw?,. in Exhi It 3-2.This capacity comes in the form 0 response facilities and apparatus.It is anticipat- camp high-ri<6 City.As this growth occurs,the RRFA intends to increase its capacity for emergency response at new growth‘ Exhibit 3-2.Emergency Response Bed Capacity by S ;for response created by new growth‘From this nyrn<<(BYVB (hnmln.,.. fbeds necessary for staffing fire and emergency ed that much of the growth in the RRFAservice - utilize excess bed capacity in current stations to existing stations.Systemwide,this analysis finds ation Station Name Total Beds Fire Station 11 9 Fire Station 12 Fire Station 13 rlre Manon 14 Fire Station 15 Fire Station 17 Total 51 urrentlvin Use Percentage of Capacity in Use Rate Study for Fire Impact Fees -August 2025 16 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) 3.4 CAPITALCOST OF RESPONSE This section guides the reader through a serie determining the total capital costs of respon inventory of fire apparatus and stations and t responded.Next is an analysis of the capital including calculation of the capital cost per resp: Amnrn‘nnnn 5N-m:sumac-my Icayullaca m::u mum.m... responses,and incident rates are calculated t responses per unit of development for each ty r9<nnn<n nun] ”dram"”am.-."”4“...«u.“n.“w w.» medical service (EMS)and to inci ALCULATIONS s of formulas and calculations with the goal of se by unit of development.It begins with an he number of emergencies to which the RRFA cost of fire protection apparatus and stations snse. {ulnar “me rnnniun?mums,w m:Lyyca u.mnu uaca mm Ichclvcu o quantify the average number of emergency pe of land use.The costs per response and the ratnnn<9<Amaruanruu...u.....~...0.“‘Nu v.qurdvvlaVa N “Hwy...” ients at each tvpe of land use‘The EMS and fire/other cost per unit of development are c cdevelopment.The total cost is adjusted for pay fee rates for the RRFA for development within tl These steps are described below in the formulz explanation of calculations of fire impact fees. 3.4.1 Formula F-1:Inventory and Fire /The RRFA owns and/or operates a variety of fir Units,etc‘).Each vehicle responds to many eme per apparatus is used as one element in calculat rormula r-L:Responses There are two variables that require explanation Ire Apparatus )mbined to calculate the total cost per unit of ments of other and the result is the fire impact 1e City. as,descriptions of variables,tables of data,and Other and EMS Responses 2 apparatus (L9,,fire engines,ladder trucks,Aid rgencies.The average number of EMS responses ing the cost per EMS response. paratus Kesponses per Apparatus :(A)fire apparatus and (B)fire stations. The term “fire apparatus”applies to vehicles ' contains a list of each type of primary fire appar 5 lnthls study,”?re/other"refers to all emergency Incidents m which R fires,hazarduus maxerlalsvgas leaks,and other nonrmedlcal related Rate Study for Fire Impact Fees -August 2025 that the RRFA uses for operations.Exhibit 3-3 atus and the number of each type. m responds exceptlm medical emelgencles/EMS.These would include emergencies. 17 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Exhibit 3-3.Apparatus Inventory and Emergency Re s Count of ApparalTypeofApparatusinInventory Engine 12 Ladder Aid Unit Hazardous Materials Vehicle Brush Truck Command Vehicle :ponses 2024 :us Total Annual EMS EMS Responses per Responses Individual Apparatus 13,150 1,096 Dive Apparatus Service Vehicle )[BI’T Vehicle UtilityVehicle Other Apparatus/liquipment6 Total 68 5 Includes trailers,cans,boat,em Rate Study for Fire Impact Fees -August 2025 18 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Variable (B):Fire Stations RRFA provides fire/other and EMS services ou stations and the total square footage of RRFA fi shop and tower).Exhibit 3-4 also shows the tot; square footage of fire station per incident (calcl fire stations by the number of annual fire/ oi:incidents from stations is less than the total inci than one apparatus responds to many calls, apparatus responding to a calla "MN;”my:av/‘nrrn:Ilulcu cal m LAIIqu.4-4 ,um:I)cAncoa : t of seven stations.Exhibit 3-4 lists the seven re stations and associated support facilities (Let, 1|fire/otherand EMS incidents,and the average Jlated by dividing the total square footage of all her and EMS incidents)‘The total number of ients from apparatus (Exhibit 3-3)because more but often one station is the source of all the §5§3nn A”;mum.Layauuy apt:lwvu:uuc w m:uvuuamc square feet in use per incident. Exhibit 3-4.Building Inventory and Building Square Building Anna S!f N > a '0“ame Square Feet lnclde" Fire Station118 20,550 Fire Station12(ExEOC)9 14,800 Fire Station 13 20,521 Fire Station 13 Shop 6,000 Fire Station14 13.659 Hre station lb /,49/ =eet per Incident 2024 TotalBuiIding Patina?“Station5quare Square Feet per ..Feet in Use Per _Capacl .Incldent Incident II ts vac Fire Station 16 7,732 Fire Station 17 6,836 quu “1;,‘33 “1,”: 7 See Exhibit 372 ior calculation of systemwide siztion capacity m use 3 Statmn u IS owned by the my 0f Ramon and leased m RRFA, 9 sxanon12 IS wwned by the my of Ramon and leased to me RRFA. utvllzed exclusively by the my of Kenton Emergency Managemem n. - Rate Study for Fire Impact Fees -August 2025 0')1|: 4.9:m In 3‘: The building square fnoxage excludes the poDn of me Slauon [hm .5 Ilsmn. 19 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) 3.4.2 Formula F-2:Annua|Cost per Ap Formulas F-2 through F4 are needed to calculat first step in this calculation is to identify and an formula F-Z.The capital cost per apparatus is b and major support equipment.The annualize¢ dividing the capital cost of each type of apparatl rormula r74:Hre Apparatus LOSE + There are two variables that require explanation Variable (C):Fire Apparatus Cost paratus e the apparatus cost per fire/otherincident.The nualize the cost of each type of apparatus using ased on the cost of primary response apparatus 1 capital cost per apparatus is determined by JS by its useful life: Usevu)Lwe Annual LosK Per/Apparatus :(C)fire apparatus cost and (D)useful life. Exhibit 3-5 shows the annualized cost for each ty cost perapparatus includes the vehicle,fire and equipped apparatus Variable (D):Useful Life Exhibit 3-5 also shows the number of years of uss cost is calculated by dividing each apparatus co expects apparatus to serve one half of its use1 reserve or call-back vehicle. pe of primary apparatus listed in Exhibit 3-3.The EMSequipment,and communication equipment. represent zful life ofeach type of apparatus.The annualized st by the useful life of that apparatus,Note that ,*7”H”,,,,,,,,,,,,,*1 ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,I,I,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, =u|life in a front-line status and one have as a Rate Study for Fire Impact Fees -August 2025 20 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Exhibit 3-5.Annualized Apparatus Cast in 2025 Apparatus Type Cost per Apparal Engine $1,738,800 Ladder $2,748,000 Aid Unit $526,713 (71-:71;: IIuLquvualvlalcllala mum:3,44,,” Brush Truck $383,297 CommandVehic|e $132,130 Dive Apparatus $389,600 Average Uselul Lifespan11 13.71 Annualized Cost of Apparatus $126,827.13 21 $18,552.38 Service Vehicle $112,481 Staff Vehicle $46,192 Utility Vehicle $84,548 Small Utility Vehicle $50,957 Other Apparatus/Equipment10 $235,607 3.4.3 Formula F-3:Cost per Apparatus The second step in calculating the apparatus co: Ihe capltal COSI per nre/otner or th1D Inclaent annualized cost per apparatus by the total annu of apparatus responds to.Each type of apparatu type OT apparatus responalng [0 an H'ICIDEI'II va incident. Formula F-3:Annual Per + Apparatus 15 15 15 $149873 $3,07a‘47 $5,636.53 15 $15,707.13 per Fire/Otheror EMS Response st per fire/otheror EMS response is formula F-3. IS Calculated ror each apparatus Dy lelOlf‘lg the al response (both fire/other and EMS)each type sis analyzedseparately because the number and rles uepenulng on me type and seventy OT me nual Responses Annual Apparatus Cost 'er Apparatus yer nasponse There are no new variables used in formula formula; 3-6 the cost per or EMS re: Exhibit 3-6 shows the annualized cost of one of 6 average annual EMS responses for each type of per response is calculated by dividing the annue number of annual responses for the same type W Includes carts,trailers,near,and mr.Cast is cumulative. 11 Fm Engines,Laddevs,and Aid unrrs,\he average useml Irfespans haw front-llne vs reserve or callback. Rate Study for Fire Impact Fees -August 2025 -3,Both variables were developed in previous sponse is calculated each of aach type of apparatus (from Exhibit 3-5)and the Ipparatus (from Exhibit 3-3).Each apparatus cost Ilized cost of that type of apparatus by the total >fapparatus. 3 been weighted to reflect the proportion of vehicles in the fleet that are 21 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Exhibit 3-6.Apparatus Costs per Response Annualized C 4AtTpparausVPeApparatu .—an,:nglne puma“ Ladder $152,666 Brush Truck $25,553, Command Vehicle $13,213. A A l )st of verage nnua Apparatus Cost PerResponsesPer ‘5 Apparatus Response "‘nan,Hu—q. $258.76 13 1 1 52,323.01 D e Apparatus $18,552, ServiceVehicle $7,498.? Staff Vehicle $3,079.! Utility Vehicle $5,636. Small Utility Vehicle $3,397.] Other Amparatus/Equipment12 $15,707, 12 Includes carts,trailers,boat,and lift. Rate Study for Fire Impact Fees -August 2025 22 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) 3.4.4 Formula F-4:Total Apparatus Co The third step in calculating the apparatus cost apparatus cost per fire/other incident is cal cpercent calculation accounts forthefact that multiple ap that some apparatus are only dispatched to calculation is a weighted average total cost of Annual Cost Per Appara'Formula F4:Response X Fire/ 0 There is one new variable that requires exl ;t per Fire/OtherIncidents per fire/other incident is Formula F-4.The total ulated by multiplying the apparatus cost per 1ts tvpe apparatus responds to, iparatuses are dispatched to many incidents,and specific types of incidents The result of this )Daratus incident [us Percem ofall _Apparatus COSt Per ther Responses 7 Fire/OtherIncident )Ianation:(F)apparatus percent of fire/other responses‘ Variable (E):Apparatus Percent of Fire Responses The next step in calculating the apparatus cost number of incidents that RRFA responds to. categories:EMS.Exhibit 3-7 l Incidents responded to during 2014. Exhibit 3-7.Annual Fire/Otherand EMS Incidents Incident Type Annual lncidems Fire/Other 4,905 EMS 15,881 Total 20,786 per fire/other incident is to identify the annual Emergency incidents are separated into two St:the annual number of ?re/other and EMS Different types of fire/otheremergencies need a result,the usage of apparatus varies amon Important TBCIOY In uetermtnlng me COSI per If each type of apparatus is calculated in Exhibit 3- each type of apparatus by the total annua|fire/ “L A;n“Lu.A.“ CEICUIEIIDH ||'|CXnIUIE 3'0 IS the percent DT TII'E apparatus. Rate Study for Fire Impact Fees -August 2025 :iifferent types or combinations of apparatus.As g the types of apparatus.This variance is an iCIGEnL Ine percent OT TIrE/omer responses Dy 8 by dividing the annual fire/other responses for ither incidents from Exhibit 37.The result of the 1A..”.nuh -4“.”AL (utner |nc|uents responueu (O my eacn type or 23 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Exhibit 3-8.Fire/OtherResponses per Incident by A ; Annual Fire/ 0theApparatusTypeRelatedResponses Apparatus Engine 4,667 Ladder 505 Hazardous Materials Vehicle 130 Brush Truck 33 )paratus Type er— for Annual Fire/Other-Apparatus Response per lnri?nnf: 0.951 0.103 CommandVehicle 527 Dive Apparatus 17 Service Vehicle 0 Total 6,343 The final step in calculating the apparatus cost p Exhi t 3-9.The cost per responseforeach ty [1-,]the percent OT nre/other II'ICIGEFIIS OISPEKCneQ [0 cost per fire/other incident.The "bottom line"i ‘incident of $17425.In other words,every fi dppdvdluh Exhibit 3-9.Apparatus Cost per Fire/OtherIncident Apparatus cast Apparatus Type 0.000 4,905 er fire/otherincident is shown in Exhibit 3-9. .of apparatus(from Exhibit 3--6)IS multiplied by urom tanDlI 3-5}resultlng In the total apparatus n Exhibit 3-9 is the apparatus cost per fire/other 'e/other incident ”uses up"$17415 worth of Jer Apparatus Response per Apparatus Cost per Imp."Inri?nn} $11572 U Hazardous Materials Vehicle $38.40 $258.76 $2323.01 Command Vehicle $119.04 Dive Apparatus $452.50 DEFVICE Vehicle Total Rate Study for Fire Impact Fees -August 2025 U,UUU u.uw $174.25 24 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) The RRFA dispatch system does not track usage uuvvevel,mes:appal muses me alau esseuua.n for the cost of these apparatus in this rate study the useful lifespan and divides these annualizec phi-,I N.”narm:ww.um um umueum Exhibit 3-10.Staff Vehicle and Other Equipment/ A3) Total Cost of AllApparatusTvpeApparatus CL_K€\I..Lemu vmnu:QUUU,H=U )f staffvehicles and otherequipment/apparatus. nrH emu-5cm”leapuuuc upcu auull).w uLLquu ,Exhibit 3-10 divides the total apparatus cost by [costs by the total annual incidents to calculate paratus Cost per Incident Useful lifespan (years) Annualiled Cost Annual Cost par of Apparatus Incidents Incident (An A33L3Q‘l-U,U33.UI .PJ..273 Utillty Vehicle $845,480 Small Ut ty Vehicle $152,871 {725. .Wm ”mum“.vhuww Total 15 $56,365.33 $2.71 15 $10,191‘40 $0.49 (1:7n712 (n73 ,u‘ww 20,786 ,umv Rate Study for Fire Impact Fees -August 2025 25 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) 3.4.5 Formula F-5:Annual Station Cost The annual station cost is determined by dividing Formula F75:Cost Per + vanaule rap;aluuun Luil pal aqua":rum Exhibit 3-11 presents the calculation of the a nsquarefoot,based on estimates from TCA.Th First,the land cost per building square foot is d g the station capital cost by its useful life. Annual Station Cost PerUsefulLife ion:(G)station cost per square foot. 'erage annualized fire station cost per building is cost is broken down into three components. arived by dividing the total land cost for the new btatlon 1b by the combined area of the land Second,the cost for the building,furnishings, actual costs for Station 16 and the Maintena calculated by taKIng the total Interest on the O E and dividing it by the total square footage of the The useful life represents the length of time the replaced‘The annualized cost is calculated by di average useful life‘The ”bottom line"of Exhibi tsquarefoot. Exhibit 3-11.Annualized Station Cost per Square For (0:! Type of Cost Square Land $52.1 Building,Furnishings,&$862. and adding the site work cost per square foot. and equipment is based on the average of the Inca Building.Lastly,the cost of borrowing is EDI SEI’VICE payments associated Wlth btatlon lb Station 16 site. station is expected to last before it needs to be viding the estimated cost per square foot by the 3-11 is an annualized station cost of $20.68 per )t 00‘(years)Square Foot L1 CostofBorrowing $119. 5 Total $1,034. 13Theestimates were pvovided by TCA as of 5/29/2021 The station casts.An addmonal 53%.s added for svte preparation and soft costs k,g.«?gs? Rate Study for Fire Impact Fees -August 2025 ,11 50 and maintenance shop average 5554.05pal sq.ft.for "hard"building such as sales tax,design,permvmng and furnishings.The mrzl cost per 26 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) 3.4.6 Formula F-6:Station Cost per Fi The station cost per fire/other and EMS inciden cost per square foot by the station square feet Annual Station Cost Station Formula F-6:pequuare Foot X Fire/ Othe' There are no new variables used in formula formulas‘ This calculation is shown in Exhibit 3-12,The St multxplled by the station square reet per Inelaen a”~§L a/Otherand EMS Incident t is calculated by multiplying the annual station rer fire and EMS incident. Square Fee‘Per Annual Station Cost Per and EMS Incident 7 Fire/Otherand EMS Incident -6.Both variables were developed in previous ation cost per square foot (from Exhibit 3-11)is I (Trom IZXI'IIDII$47}.lhe result IS the station COSt ”4,m gm.“pal Inc/mum allu meumucu up"$67.17 worth of fire station. Exhibit 3-12.Station Cost per Incident Annual Siation Cost per Square Foot Square Feet p: 52068 3.25 3.4.7 Formula F-7:Annual Fire Inciden The annual fire/other incident rate per unit of d non-residential development)is calculated by each type of land use by the number of d mdevelopmentforthattypeoflanduse. Annual Fire/Other Nu CI VVUI ua,Cabl I IIC/ULIICI allu LIVIJIIIDIUCIIL UDC) 2r Incident Annualized Station Cost per |ncident $67.17 t Rate per Unit of Development evelopment (i.e.,dwelling unit or square foot of dividing the total annual fire/other incidents to ielling units or square feet of non-residential nberowaelling Units Annual Fire/Other Formula F77:Incidents at Each Type of +or Land Use There are two variables that require explanatio land use types,and (l)number of dwelling units Rate Study for Fire Impact Fees -August 2025 Square Feet of Each =Incidents Per Unit of Type of Land Use Development (H)annual emergency incidents at or square feet. 27 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Variable (H):Annual Emergency Fire Incidents at land The emergency inudent data comes trom tr individual incident by property type.For the combines property types into 13 broad [and use As shown in Exhibit 3-13,RRFA responded to incidents,3,240 were coded to a specific pro categories (i .the incident occurred at a spa business).428 incidents occurred in roads and The records for the remaining 1,237 were not roadways.These include incidents with no code as vacant land or construction sites.To accow Use Types ie RRFA’s dispatch records.RRFA codes each purpose of developing impact fees,this study categories.1A -,905 fire/other incidents during 2024.Of these perty type related to one of the 13 land use fic property address,such as a residence or streets (in most cases these are traffic-related) coded to one of the 13 land use categories or at all or those at other kinds of properties such 1t for all incidents,these 1,237 incidents were allocated proportionally to properties or roads 5 Exhibit 3-13.Fire/OtherIncidents by Location Fire/Other Percent Incidents ldemi?abIncldentLocatlcnIdenti?able by Fire/ anation Incidents At Proper?es 3,240 88.33% In Roads and Streets 428 11‘67‘ k Total 3,668 The next four exhibits present the allocation categories Ind streets. Unidenti?ahle Fire/Other Total Incidents Fire/Other of Fire/Other ie Incidents Nat -r Identi?able by Property Type 1,093 4,333 144 572 1.237 4,905 of fire/other incidents among the 13 land use 1“RRFA dispatch data mcludes pmpertv codes far 172 um!resrdence :caKegory ”smglErfamIIY'and ”mulllrfamllv’?However,developme- duplexes,”Mulli»famil‘f'is inclusive 0'all structures with mars famliy”land use Kype conslslenily. Rate Study for Fire Impact Fees -August 2025 ,and muMJaml‘y residences.For Slmpllclly,this rate study labels each m data for each of these caxegones starting m Exhibit 3.14 re?eds me «942mm a;(immhmnu ,.\..u.....,u...“u..\.qr".._.....,...._...\.u."u...“no"..u.....,"an“...u...‘ 2 than 2 units.Additionally,mobile homes are included in the ”multi— 28 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Exhibit 3-14 shows the fire/other incidents that .Luuuy [nylon— >Iluw>m:m :[ulllcl muucms um Wm c u.luau: of the analysis of fire/otherincidents.The total the fire/other incidents allocated among direct MN,,Ilm-ao-i...‘inridnn§r allu we allvhauuu u.muucuu a»luau.)ullu an: 3-15).Exhibit 3-16 combines the fire/otherincid 3-17 shows the fire/otherincident rate per unit Exhibit 3-14 shows the distribution of the 3,240 use along with the percent distribution of thes 4,333 fire/otherincidents (3,240 traceable +1,( types using the percent distribution column.Th were identifiable by land use type,Exhibit 3-15 ”m“..auu su Eek).meu 3-“;summa-me:u I:msuus annual fire/otherincidents are a combination of responses to land use types (from Exhibit 3-14) ‘5...“a.“(tram cl.)unacu uu u up Ecllcluuv ent data (those land use and traffic),and Exhibit of development. lalc.)\nvm Lmuuu fire/other incidents that are traceable to a land 3 3,240 incidents.In the ?nal column,the total )93 allocated)are allocated among the land use a result is the total annual fire/otherincidents at each at the land use types. Exhibit 3-14.Fire/OtherIncidents at Specific Land U : Annual Hre/Utner Land Use Type Incidents Identi?able to Land Use Single-Family Residential 828 Hotel/MoteI/Resort91 LEISUFE I-acmtles ses Percent or All Property Allocate Iotal Property Fire/OtherIncidents Related Fire/OtherIncidents Identi?able In Land Use (4,333)to Land Uses 25,5670 1,107 49 11.51%499 U.85‘7o Restaurant/Lounge Industrial/Manufacturing 131 Education 164 Total 3,240 l|\- Exhibit 3-15 shows total units of development dwelling unit counts comes from City staff.These Rate Study for Fire Impact Fees -August 2025 0.43%19 4,333 :y [and use category for the year 2025.Data on adata reflect conditions in 2025 within the entire 29 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) RRFA service area,including City,KCFDZS,and K ! (:me ebb.cw. The fire/otherincidents in roads and streets are of traffic generated by each type of land use.|r square feet of non-residential15 construction number of daily trips that are generated by eat of Trip Generation by the Institute of Transport: associated with each land use type.The percer calculated from the total of all trips. tot: streets (428 traceable +144 allocated)are assig :FD40.These data on units of development were <|Imm:r\l 1 r“r 1 www- allocated to land use types based on the amount I Exhibit 3-15,the number of dwelling units and in the RRFA service area is multiplied by the :h land use type as reported in the 11th Edition ation Engineers (ITE).The result is the total trips It of trips associated with each land use type is :nedto land use types using the percent of trips generated‘ Exhibit 3-15.Fire/OtherIncidents in Roads and Sue: Units of Land U52 TYPE Development Sing|erFamily Residential 30,598 d.u. MuItI-Famlly Residential 23,814 d,u. Hotel/Motel/Resort 1 850 room Medical Care Facility 615 bed 7:0a,1.).7,-r-1a «‘1 Medical/DentalOffice 955,776 sq.ft. Retail 5 397 968 Sq-ft- Leisure Fac ies 522,943 sq.ft- _ its -Allocated to Land Uses Annual Fire/Other Incidents in Roads and per ITETrip Percent of ieneration Total Trips Trips Rate Generated 0v uevelupmem 9.43000 288,539 27.93%160 6.74000 160,506 15.54%89 7.99000 14 782 1.43%8 ’2 32000 13 727 n1noA u.u1ua-¢y~,aJ/_3.1:m 0.03600 34,408 3.33% 0.03701 199779 19.34%111 0.02882 15,071 1.46%8 r Industrial/Manufacturing 15,465,470 ,S,qift' .Church/NonimeIt 864,390 sq.ft. Education student Special Public Fac ties 1,700,376 sq.ft. Ivuul 15 Nonrresidemal unns of?evelopmem exclude summed parklng. 51ngInallsuucmreslzvgevwin.more man‘wo units plus mobile homes, Rate Study for Fire Impact Fees -August 2025 0.00475 73,461 0.00760 6,569 0.64%4 1 94000 0.02259 38,411 3.72%21 :7) II-Iv-I-I’vvu'a. :le—familyunits include duplexes.Multi—familyresidential includes units 30 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Exhibit 3-16 summarizes the results of the an responses to land use types (from Exhibit 3—14) a|based on trip generation rates (from Exhibit 3-1! Exhibit 3-16.Total Fire/OtherIncidents by Land Use Annual Fire/Other Land Use Single-Family Residential 1,107 Mul -Family Residential 1,773 alysis of fire/other incidents.The total annual (ira/nfhnr 1d the allocation of incidents at roads and streets 5). Annual Fire/OtherIncidents Alloca‘ed to Land Use Incidents by Land Use 160 1,267 Hotel/Motel/Resort 122 M d'cal C Leisure Facilities Restaurant/Lounge 63 Industrial/Manufacturing 175 Church/Non-Profit Education 2 19 SpeCIal Public FaCIlItIes 19 Total 4,333 572 4,905 Rate Study for Fire Impact Fees -August 2025 31 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Thefinal step in determiningtheannualfire/athi 1‘]m meu xuw IIIE Lulu!alulual HIE/vulcl un. 16)are divided by the number of dwelling uni annual incident rate per dwelling unit or square ma.Amp—"n.“im-ipignnwasuacuwum:uu Iclalcu «mum-u- The results in Exhibit 3-17 Show how manytimes incident to which the RRFA respondsi For exam 0.0414141 fire/otherincidents per year.This is t homes have a fire/otherincident in a year.Anot lanaveragesingle-family home would have a fir 2r incident rate per unit ofdevelopment is shown menu nu.:aul type:uv muu use \num Lmuuu J' ts or square feet of structures to calculate the foot.The units of development are the same as '23;Evklkiq-2,1lac:Lmuuu 414,. ‘an average unit ofdevelopment has a fire/other ple,a single-family residence has an average of he same as saying that about 4%of single-family wer way of understanding this information is that :/other incident once every 25 years. a“...._,.. Total Annual Fire/0t ?Land Use Type Incidents Attributed SingleFamily Residential 1,267 -Fami|v Hotel/Mctel/Resort Medical Care Facility 61 Medical/DentalOff e Retail Leisure Facilities 44 Restaurant/Lounge ner Annual Fire/Other to Units 0'Development Incidents Per Unit of n....|m‘m...o 30,598 d. room 0 0702098 615 bed 000993483 8,759,448 sq.ft.0.0000243 955,776 sq.ft.000000717 0 0001129 522,943 sq.ft.000000850 373,733 sq.ft.0.0002276 EOUCEIIOI"£45 Special Public Fac 40 15 source:RRFA and City of Ramon Rate Study for Fire Impact Fees -August 2025 15,465 470 864 390 sq.ft.0 0000140 ft 0 0000692 4/,155 1,700,376 SIUGenI sq‘ft. U.UUU 1455 00000235 32 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Formula F-8:Fire/OtherIncident The capital cost of fire/other incidents per unit annual fire/otherincidents per unit of developn cost tvpe Exhibit 3-12),then multiplying that result times Annual Fire/Other Formula Lg;Incidents per Unit of X Fire InckDevetopment are no formulas.In Exh'‘3-18 through Exhibit 3-30,e: Capital Cost per Unit of Development )f development is determined by multiplying the lent (from Exhibit 3-17)times the annual capital iaratus (from 3-9)(from the useful life of the apparatus or fire station‘17 Useful Lifeof Fire Incident capital rm“, x Apparatusgr :WNW WW. '8'“DevelopmentS‘ation were ach fire/otherincident rate (from Exhibit 3-17)is multiplied by the annual capital cost per fire/ otlusefullifeoftheapparatusorstationtocalcul aeachtypeofapparatusandstation.For ex 0.0414141 fire/other incidents per year (i.e.,4% multiplying this incident rate times the annual c 9)per incident indicates a cost of about $4.55 fire engines for one year.Since the weighte4 residential dwelling needs to pay for 13.71 time: vear‘ 1er incident.The result is then multiplied by the lte the capital cost per unit of development for ample,single-family residential units average of a fire/other incident per year).In Exhibit 3-18, apital cost of an engine ($110.10 from Exhibit 3- )er single-family dwelling unit to provide it with :1 useful life of an engine is 13.71 years,the sthe annual rate,for a total of about $62.51 per 17 Some ?re Impact fees are calculaxed for me economic life 0!‘ apparatus and stations that provide the fire protection,Both methuc ram smdvcharges .mpm fees fur the ?rst of each type 0f apparams. ovapparatus and stamens are tun?en ny omer revenues avauamem t Rate Study for Fire Impact Fees -August 2025 he property pavmg the Impact fee,rather than the useful Me at the ‘5 meet the legal requirements for Impact fees.The method used in this and statmn needed for new development,but subsequent replacements he RNA. 33 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Exhibit 3-18.Engine Cost of Response to Fire/ Other Unit 0'Annual F ILandUseTypeDevelopment Incidents of Develn Single-Family Residential d .0.041 Mul -Family Residential Hotel/Motel/Resort room 0.070 Medical Care FaCIIIty bed 0.099 Office sq‘ft.0.000 Incidents,per Unit of Development Engine cast at 511040 Engine Life Cost per per Fire/Other Unit of Development Incident,per Unit of Based on 13.71-Vear Development useful life re/Ot‘ner Per Unit ‘pment M dical/DentalOffice Retall LeisureFacilities Educaon student 0.009 Special Public Fac ties sq.ft.0,000 0850 50.0094 2276 $0.0251 (n Rate Study for Fire Impact Fees -August 2025 34 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Exhibit 3-19 calculates the capital cost per unit 0 1H.“muucuu.me umumu um:\uum LNIIDIL J'LI fire/other incident ($2367 from Exhibit 3-9). weighted useful life of 18 years to calculate the Exhibit 3-19.Ladder Cost of Response to Fire/ Other Annual F Development Incident of Devel: Land Use Type Residential d.u.0.01 l\/l|||fi—F:mi|\l 'development for a ladder response to fire/other a”,I)lvluluplleu uy we muum >Lapuul um ycl The result is then multiplied by the ladder’s :apital cost per unit of development for ladders. Incidents,per Unit of Development Ladder Cost at $23.67re/Other Ladder Life Cost per Per Unit )pment Unit of DevelopmentIncident,per UH“of Based on ls-Vear lifeDevelopment $038 (7'; Hotel/Motel/Resort room 0.07 Medical Care Facility bed 0.05 Of?ce sq.ft.0.0( Medical/DentalOffice sq.ft.0.0( Retail sq.ft.0.0( LEISUre FaCIIItIes sq.ft.0.0( Restaurant/Lounge Industrial/ Nu.m“. sq.?. Lnurcn/Non-FrOTII sq.l'(.LI.UL Education student 0.0( Special sq.0.0( '02098 $156 322.7842 i93483 $235 332.2401 ruuouz )u.uu )u.u4(3 191433 $022 $2.9671 Rate Study for Fire Impact Fees -August 2025 35 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Exhibit 3-20 calculates the capital cost per uI a; rue/umm HILIUEIIL).In:umumu um:\num LA fire/other incident ($363 from Exhibit 3-9).' weighted average useful life of an aid unit to ca 6,..—,Hw.alu mun. Exhibit 3-20.Aid Unit Cost of Response to Fire/ Othe Unit of Annual Fi r-Land Use Type Development lnciden' Single-Family Residential d.u.0.041: wit of development for aid units responses to mullainlinpl a-..mun an“,I)IIIuILIlecu uy we ulu mm.mm ycl The result is then multiplied by the nine-year lculate the capital cost per unit of development r Incidents,per Unit of Development Ald Unit Cost at a/Other $3.63 per Fire/Other t Rate Incident,per Unit of Development Aid Unit Life Cost per Unit at Development at 9-Vear life 1141 50.1503 51.3530 Mul -Fam yResidential d. Hotel/MoteI/Resort MedicalCare Facility bed 0.0993 Of?ce sq‘ft.0.000! LCIDUIE raulluch Industrial/Manufacturingsq,ft.0.000! Church/Non-Prcfit Educa Ion 0.000: 3717 50.0003 50.0023 Rate Study for Fire Impact Fees -August 2025 36 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Exhibit 3-21 calculates the capital cost per unit Ie>pullaca lU Hue/mum muuenm,me muucn hazardous materials vehicle cost per fire/ otherthenmultipliedbythe21-year useful life of a he :”we may m3.-yuan ycl mm w ucvcluyvllcln nu.IIuLquuu)mm Exhibit 3-21.Hazardous Materials Vehicle Cost of R :Development Annua ”n"°f Fire/Lam use TV” Incident! of development for hazardous materials vehicle ”h L Idle \uum LAIIIUIL r“,.3 Illulupllcu uy m: incident ($585 from Exhibit 3-9).The result is zardous materials vehicle to calculate the capital c.luv.)vcumca. asponse to Fire/OtherIncidents,per Unit of Hazardous Materials Hazardous Materials Vehicle Cost at $6.86 per Vehicle Life Cost per Firp/thpr Inzidpnt,npr stplnnmpnt II Ier late UnI of Develupment at 21-Vear I e Single-Family Residential d.u.0.04141 Multi-Fa mily Residential d.u.0.07815 Hotel/MoteI/Resort 0.0702( Medical Care Facility bed 0.09931 Medical/DentalOffice sq.ft.0.00002 Retail sq.ft.0.00012 LeisureFacilities sq.ft.0.00002 “can“.um,“mus:valuvL: Industrial/Manufacturing sq.ft.0.00002 sq.ft.0.00006 [41 50.2841 55.9661 )98 $05365 511.2655 50.0163 50.0122 (n Special Public Facilities sq.ft. Rate Study for Fire Impact Fees -August 2025 37 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Exhibit 3-22 calculates the capital cost per uni ?.—a»“h rue/mm"u-uucms.Illculuuelu.IaLc‘IIUIII LAIII fire/otherincident ($15.63 from Exhibit 3-9).T|1 life of a brush truck to calculate the capital cost Exhibit 3-22.Brush Truck Cost of Response to Fire/ O Annue Land Use Type Fire/ 0HDeveoen!I p'"Incident! Residential d.u.0‘0414 0791( t of development for brush truck responses to .,.I,a”uu 4-.“,u Illulupllcu uy me u.um.u u“um pcl e result is then multiplied by the 15-year useful per unit of development for brush trucks. \ther Incidents,per Unit of Development Brush Truck Cost at tin/(mm.Brush Truck Life Cast per.. ent,per Unit of Development [41 Ier late Unit of Development at 15-Vear Life (1 (12 Hotel/Motel/Resort room 0.0702( Medical Care Facility bed 0.09931 Of?ce sq.ft.0.00002 Medical/DentalOffice sq.ft.0000'. Retail sq.ft.0.00012 Lelsu re FaCIlItIes sq.ft.0.00005 Restaurant/Lounge sq.ft.0.00022 Industrial/sq.R.0.0000: Nu.m“.Mm,"Lnurcn/Non-FrOTII sq.l'(.u.uuuu: Education student 0.00911 Special sq. 183 51.5528 523.2922 Rate Study for Fire Impact Fees -August 2025 38 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Exhibit 3-23 calculates the capital cost per unit A“;”h (5..-...w me/uuvuv muucuu.me muuenuane mm"L. cost perfire/other incident ($12.79 from Exhibit useful life of a command vehicle to calculate yullulluuu vcmuca. Exhibit 3-23.Command Vehicle Cost of Response to Annua Fire/0!} Incident Unit ofLandUseTypeDevelopment Single-Fa mily Residential d.u.0.04142 3f development for command vehicle responses :,Lu.&l«nmumJul,I)Inuluplleu uy m:wuuua..u mum..- 3-9).The result is then multiplied bythe ten-year the capital cost per unit of development for Fire/OtherIncidents,per Unit of Development Lommana VEhICIE Cast at command vehicle me $12.79 per Fire/Other Cost per Unit of Incident,per Unit 0f Development at Development IO-Vear Life |er late [41 50.5297 57.2620 Mul-FamilyRestdentlald.0.07815 room 0.0702( bed 0.0993: sq.ft.0.0000; Medical/DentalOffice sq.ft.0.00007 Retail sq.ft.0.00012 LCIDUIE raulluch \1.uvuu‘ Restaurant/Loungesq.ft.0.00022 Industrial/Manufacturingsq,ft.0.00002 Church/Non-Prcfit 0.0000E Educa Ion student 0.0091: 183 51.2707 517.4208 717 50.0009 50.0126 Rate Study for Fire Impact Fees -August 2025 39 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Exhibit 3-24 calculates the capital cost per unit Fyhi per ?re/other Incident ($157 from Exhlblt 3-9). life of a dive apparatus to calculate the capita|c‘ Exhibit 3-24.Dive Apparatus Cost of Response to Fi r Annua _Unit of Land use Type Fire/0nDevelopmentIncident Single»Family Residential d.u.0.041 of development for dive apparatus responses to V“, he result Is then multipliedbythe21--year useful ast per unit of development for dive apparatus‘ e/OtherIncidents.per Unit of Development Dive Apparatus cast at Dive Apparatus Life may Cost per Unit of ler late Incident,per Unit uf Development at Development Zl-Vear Life [41 300650 30.9753 Hotel/Mctel/Resort room 0.0702( Medical Care Facility bed 0.0993: Office sq.ft.0.00002 Office sq.ft.0.0000". 0.00012 Leisure Facilities 0.00002 Restaurant/Lounge sq.ft.0.00022 Industrial/Manufacturingsq.ft 0.00002 Education student0. SpecialPublic Facilitiessq.ft.0. Rate Study for Fire Impact Fees -August 2025 4o AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Exhibit3-25 calculates the capital cost per unit a».une/uuvev mun-ems.me muuem mu.-\num um per fire/otherincident ($000 from Exhibit 3-9). life of a service vehicle to calculate the capital c c Exhibit 3-25.Service Vehicle Cost of Response to Fir : Unit of Development Fire/0t} Incident! Land Use Type Single-Family ResidentiaI d.u.0‘04141 of development for service vehicle responses to ..-L.:,.I,\mu J'Lll I)Illulupllcu uy we bun/1b:vemue um 'he result is then multiplied by the 15-year useful )5:per unit of development for service vehicles. a/OtherIncidents,per Unit of Development Service Vehicle cast at Service Vehicle Life Cost $0.00 per Fire/Other per Unit of Incident,per Unit of Development at Development 15-Year Life her late Multi-Family Residential d.u.0.07815 0.0702( Medical Lare faclllty bed U.U5351 0.00002 0.00011 Lelsu re FaCIlItIes sq.ft.0.00002 Restaurant/Lounge sq.ft.0.00022 Industrial/sq.ft.0.00002 Church/Non-Profit sq.ft.0.0000E Education student 0.00911 Special Public Facilities sq.ft.0.00002 Z35 50.0000 50.0000 Rate Study for Fire Impact Fees -August 2025 41 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Exhibit 3-26 calculates the capital cost per uni ! rue/unwed u-uuenu.me muuem um:\uum Lu per fire/other incident ($133 from Exhibit 3- 11usefullifeofastaffvehicletocalculatethecapitz Exhibit 3-26.Staff Vehicle Cost of Response to Fire/( Annue Land Use Type Fire/ 0t?Deveo en!I p'"Incident! Single-Familv ??—lnn :of development for staff vehicle responses to ....L.:,.l,\ Hun J’JJ/m mmupueu my me eluu vemue Luak J).The result is then multiplied by the 15-year alcost per unit of development for staff vehicles. )ther Incidents,per Unit of Development Staff Vehicle Cost at Staff Vehicle Life Cast Ier late Incident,per Unit of Development at Develapment 15-Year Life IVIqu-ramny Keslaentlal CLU. Hotel/Mctel/Resort room 0.0702 IVIeGICaI Lare faclllty bed U,U35: sq.ft.0,000C IVIEOICaI/UEHIEI UTTICe Retail sq.ft.0.000] LelSU re racmnes Restaurant/Lounge sq.ft.00002 InuustrIal/IvIanuracturIngsq.rt. Church/Non-Prcfit sq.ft.0,000C taucauon stuaent u,Uu:u .433 DU.UJ.ID DU.AD4I Special Public Facilities sq.ft.0,000C Rate Study for Fire Impact Fees -August 2025 D235 $0.0000 $0.0007 42 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Exhibit 3-27 calculates the capital cost per unit muucuu.m:”qu:le um:\Hvlu Lmuuu 4-; fire/otherincident ($271 from Exhibit 3-10).T| 1 life of a utility vehicle to calculate the capital co: Exhibit 3-27.Utility Vehicle Cost per Fire/OtherInci c , An_ Land Use Type Fire/0thDevelomentplncidem Single-Family Residential d.u.0.04141 3f development for utility vehicles for fire/other ;. I]u Illulupllcu uy we quILy vemue wan ye. e result is then multiplied by the 15-year useful ;t per unit of development for utility vehicles. lent,per Unik of Development UtllltvVehicle Life Cost |lJtllItyVehicle cast at er $2.71 per Incident,per ale Unit of Development Development at 15-Vear Life 41 $0.1122 $1.6835 Hotel/Motel/Resortroom 0.07020 Medical Care Facility bed 0,09934 Office sq.ft.0.00002 Medical/DentalOffice sq.ft.0,00007 sq.ft.0.00011 LeisureFacilities sq.ft.0,00008 Restaurant/Lounge 0,00022 Industrial/sq.‘ft‘.0.00001 ?n??? Education student 000914 Special Public Facilities sq.ft.0.00002 ‘98 $01903 52.8540 83 30.2692 34.0385 Rate Study for Fire Impact Fees -August 2025 43 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Exhibit 318 calculates the capital cost per un ?.—”w ”h nus/unwed uuuuema.In:mun—lei”.law:\uum LN vehicle cost per fire/otherincident ($0.49 from 15-year useful life of other small utility vehi ucvcwwncm w.mum omen uumy vcmuca. Exhibit 3-28.Small Utility Vehicle Cost of Response Annual Fire/ 0th:Incident R Unit ofLandUseType Development it of development for small utility vehicles for mm 4-“,u mumpueu uy m:mum slllan uumy Exhibit 3-10).The result is then multiplied by the cles to calculate the capital cost per unit of :o Fire/OtherIncident,per Unit of Development Small Utility Vehicles Small Utility Vehicles Life Cost at $0.45 per Cost per Unit of Incident,per Unit of Development at 15-Vear Development life 2! ate Single-Family Residential d.u.0.04141: Multi-Fa mily Residential d‘u.0.07819' u-»,\| ”mm/muwuncwu mum umuw. MedicalCare Facility bed 0‘09934. sq.ft.0.00002- Medical/DentalOffice sq.ft.0. Retail sq.ft.0. Leisure Facilities sq‘ft.0,00008. Restaurant/Lounge sq.ft.0.00022' Industrial/Manufacturingsq.ft.0.00001- Church/Non-Profit sq‘ft.0.00006' taucatlon student U.UUE)14.:53 50.004!)$0.0b/Z Special Public Facilities sq.ft.0,00002 Rate Study for Fire Impact Fees -August 2025 35 50.0000 50.0002 44 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Exhibit 3-29 calculates the capital cost per unit ;“hwInc/mum umueuu.m:muuem IGLC l“ apparatus/equipment cost per fire/other incid emultipliedbythe15-year useful life of other ap may (A, yet ullu.uv ucvclvylllclu .uu wuc.aypulutuo/m1 - Exhibit 3-29.Other Apparatus/Equipment Cost of R ‘Development Unit of Am”; Land Use Type Develapment Fire/0t} Iulucl of development for other apparatus/equipment §L...:11\;.w.”mun J'LI'u mumpncu uy we mus. ant ($0.76 from Exhibit 3-10).The result is then paratus/equipment to calculate the capital cost my... esponse to Fire/OtherIncident.per Unit of Other Apparatus/Equip. Cost at $0.76 per Incident,per Unit of other Apparatus/Equip.Life Cast per Unit of n‘...lnnm..¢a? Development Sin Ie-Famil Residential d.u.0.04142 Mul —family d.0.07815 Hotel/Motel/Resortroom 0.0702( MedicalCare Facility bed 0.0993: vmu:sq.u.u.uvuw Medical/DentalOffice sq.ft.0.0000" . sq.ft.0.00012 Leisure Facilities sq.ft.0.00005 Restaurant/Lounge sq.ft.0.00022 Industrial/Manufacturing sq.ft.0.00002 Church/Non-Prcfit sq.ft.0.0000E Education student 0.0091! Special Public Facilities sq.ft.0.00002 Rate Study for Fire Impact Fees -August 2025 235 $0.0000 $0.0003 45 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Exhibit 3-30 calculates the capital cost per un :nn:r:h|< per fire/other cldent ($67.17 from Exhibit 3-] useful life of fire stations to calculate the capital Exhibit 3-30.Fire Station Cost of Response to Fire/ 0‘ Land Use Type Fire/ O“D l teveopmen lncidentl Single»Family Residential d.u.0.0414: {167521l it of development for fire stations that house ..--.,.- 2)The result'Is then multiplied bythe 50--year cost per unit of development for fire stations. ther Incident,per Unit of Development 1|Fire Station Cost at Fire Station Life Cost per 1er $67.17 perlncident,per Unit of Development at {ate Uni!of Development 50-Vear Life 141 $3.0460 $139.09 ,m....,-. Hotel/MoteI/room 0 07 Medical Care Facllity bed 0 09 Office sq‘ft.00000; Retail sq.ft.0,0001‘ Leisure Facilities sq.ft.00000: Restaurant/Lounge sq.ft.0.00022 Industrial/Manufacturing sq ft.00000: LllulLlI/NUII'FIUIIL M...IL.L:UUUUI Education student 0 0 Spe al Facilities sq ft. mea $30.71 $0.08 Rate Study for Fire Impact Fees -August 2025 46 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Exhibit 3-31 combines the capital costs of all ty §L...tnt~| ulluusll LAIllUll J'JUI LU :Ivuw Ln:wm:Lapllal single-family unitl Exhib'3-31.Example of Calculation of Total Cost o Family Residential Dwelling Unit Cost Component Cost Engine $62.5 1 Ladder $13.44 pes of apparatus and station (from Exhibit 3-18 .u);u:l=>yUlI>ED LU Inc/umm Iliwuclu.)ml uuc Response to Incidents for a Single- HazardousMaterialsVehicle Brush Truck CommandVehicle Dive Apparatus Staff Vehicle $1.58 $0.30 (n Small Utility Vehicle umc.Lqu.,4.u:m,n,4,w.mw 4mm Fire Station $139.09 Total $243.97 Rate Study for Fire Impact Fees -August 2025 47 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) This example is repeated for each land use to c :~npl Eulde;3’) allu >LuLIUHII1LAHIUIL J'JL. Exhibit 3-32.Total Capital Cost of Response to Fire /I Land Use Type Unit of Developmq Single»Family Residential d.u. Medical Care Facility bed )mbine its capital costs of all types of apparatus )ther Incidents,per Unit of Development Fire/DtherIncidents:LifeCost of All Apparatus & Stations per Unit of Development $243.97 $585.25 Kestaurant/Lounge Industrial/Manufacturing sq.rt. sq.ft. Special Public Facilities sq.ft. Formula F-9:Apparatus Cost per per EMS Incident per fire/other incident in Exhibit 3-9.The total ap multiplying the cost per apparatus per respons responds to.This calculation accou dispatched to many incidents,and that some a; incidents The result of this calculation is a wei incidents Fotmula F79:Apparatus Cost Per Response There are no new variables used in formula F- SExhibit3-6,and the second variable concerning to Variable F,but using EMS responses instead Rate Study for Fire Impact Fees -August 2025 paratus cost per EMS incident is calculated by e by the percent of EMS incidents each type of nts for the fact that multiple apparatuses are )paratus are only dispatched to speci?c types of ghted average total cost of apparatus per EMS aparatus Percem of _Apparatus Cost Per EMS EMS Responses —Incident I,The first variable is identical to the data from the percent of EMS responses works identically If fire/otherresponses. 48 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Different types of EMS incidents need different :nn:r:h|< H...“ in determining the cost per incident.The percer calculated in Exhibit 3—33by dividing the annual 3-7, percent of EMS incidents responded to by ea cht8,483 responses to the 15,881 EMS incidents,e :average cost of respondingtoanEMS incident includes ‘ Exhibit 3-33.EMS Response per Incident Rate by Ap types or combinations of apparatus.As a result, :nn:r:h|< up...“ It of EMS responses by each type of apparatus is EMS responses for each type of apparatus by the ype of apparatus.Forexample,engines provided qualing 53.4%of all EMS incidents,Another way engines 8.4%of the cost of an engine. paratus Type A r t T 'pm a us we Responses for Appal Engine 8,483 Hazardous Ivlaterlals venlcle 3 Brush Truck Service Vehicle 24 Total 18,366 ..,.,,_ 'atus In:ems EMS Incident Rate 15,881 Rate Study for Fire Impact Fees -August 2025 49 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) The finaI step in calculating the apparatus cost LuaL pm chpullhe nu::uul Lyp:u:appalaLu)\l EMS incidents dispatched to (from Exhibit 3-33 incident The "bottom line"in Exhibit 3-34 is thé "UNA,mum.”nu,mum wvvua,cvcvy LIVVJ Illuuclu vac)up ‘uu- Exhibit 3-34.Apparatus Cost per EMS Incident Apparams Cost PerApparatusTypeResponse Engine $11572 per EMS incident is shown in Exhibit 3-34.The n;nun.meu J'VI I)Illulupncu uy ul:pclhclu u. ‘r)resulting in the total apparatus cost per EMS z apparatus cost per EMS incident of $104.84.In n;”mane-n.r-Uhl‘VVUI LII UI CIPPCII GILMO- Apparatus Response per Apparatus Cost per EMS EMS Incident Rate Incident [1534 $61.81 Brush Truck $2,323.01 Command Vehicle $119.04 DiveApparatus $452. 50ServiceVehicie- um: lullllula l’4u.r1llnual LIVIJIIILIUE Formula P10 is the same as Formula F-7.The ar is calculated using the same methodology as d through 3-30 are no new 00022 $10.09 0.002 0.000 ammo-o no!n; L uau:pcu uuuun ucvcnupmcnu mual EMS incident rate per unit of development escribed for fire/other incidents in Exhibit 31.4 In are identical to those used in Formula F-7,but using EMS inci AnnualEMSIncidentsat .Numbel Formula F40:Each Type of Land Use T Feet As shown in Exhibit 3-35,RRFA responded tc incidents,12,922 were coded to a specific pr: Mc-n?mim Lamp...1::uacu H.u....Luuy.J.,u1.u undue...)we are traffic-related).The records for the remaini use categories or roadways.These include incid e ylvycluc.)Juvu a.)vuwm .uuu v.yvllauuuuvll incidents were allocated proportiona?y to props Rate Study for Fire Impact Fees -August 2025 dents instead ot fire/other incidents. *ol‘Dwelling Units or Square Annual EMS Incidents Per of Each Type of Land Use 7 Unit of Development I 15,881 EMS incidents during 2024‘Of these Jperty type related to one of the 13 land use ma»Mm”nun Luéca u 1:):Lullcu m luau:nllu >u==u\ ng 1,943 were not coded to one of the 13 land ants with no code at all orthose at other kinds of (Ar mucuu,u :4:Arum =rties or roads and streets. 50 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Exhibit 3-35.EMS Incidents by Location EMS lncldents Percent oI Incident Location Identi?able by Identi?able Lacetion Incidents At Properties 12,922 92.71% In Roads and Streets 1,016 7.29% OIEI 15,335 Exhibits 3-36 through 3-39 present the allocation l.:xnInK 3:30 Snows me EIVD Inciuents I EMS Incidents unidenti?able EMS Total EMSMSNotIdentifiableIncidentsAllocated_Incidents by Location to Location 1801 14,723 142 1,153 1,343 13,661 1 of EMS incidents among types of land use: ‘tnat were Iuentlrlanle Dy Ianu use type. 2.txhlblt 5-3/shows the tMS Incidents 3.Exhibit 3—38combines the EMS incid s Exhibit 3-39 shows the EMS incident ‘that were In roads and streets. ant data (at properties and in road and streets). rate per unit of development. Rate Study for Fire Impact Fees -August 2025 51 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Exhibit 3-36 shows the distribution of the 12,92 m.” type mulls vvlul we pereem umuuuuuu w Luca EMS incidents (12,922 traceable to land use typ land use types using the percent distribution col lgnunu,nu hm“a;cam.w m:muu u):\yyca. Exhibit 3-36.EMS Incidents at Specific Land Uses Annual EMS IncidentLa“use TV”Identi?able to Land U s Qinalp-Familv Raddpntial 2 EMS incidents that are traceable to a land use I~peumucuu.u.we no»wmum,me mm ",1“ e +1,801 that are not)are allocated among the Jmn.The result isthe total annual EMS incidents _-Percent at All em:Allocate Iota:Property lncidentsldenti?ahle Related EMS Incidents to Land Use (14,723)to Land Uses 2:) [Inmynumuullua Hotel/Motel/Resort 196 Medical Care Facility 297 Office 359 Medical/DentalOffice 238 Restaurant/Lounge 114 Industrial/113 Church/Non-Prom Education 174 uyuv-u-l uwllv l uvuuuuu ‘r-l 1‘)na‘) ‘l-U.‘l-‘l-/O J,3J‘l‘ v-vv/u 4v Rate Study for Fire Impact Fees -August 2025 you“) 52 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) The EMS incidents in roads and streets are allot ”4“,.”MAR”;....\uauu.sellelakeu uy em.“type V:muu we,m LAIII feet of non-residential18 construction in the se that are generated by each land use type in the s: ”m §una Th;”aulpaunuumcuvauIcm.“.unu uac Lyvc.m:y: is calculated from the total of all trips. In the final calculation in Exhibit 3-37 the total streets (1,016 traceable +142 allocated)are ass trips generated. :xnlnlt 3-31.cm:Incluems In Kuaus anu >treets -AI :ated to land uses on the basis of the amount of ,uu J'JI,we “unme-u.uwcullls umu allu )qual: rvice area is multiplied by the number of trips ime manner as Exhibit 3-15 The result is the total ?ank ”m hm,”-5.“menu u.my:uaauumcu Wu.cum .uuu us:Lyy: ,158 annual EMS incidents that are in roads and igned to the land use types using the percent of IOCHIEU to Lana USES Land Use Type Units of Development Single»Family Residential 30,598 d,u. MultiiFamily Residential 23,814 d.u. Hotel/Motel/Resort 1,850 room ; Medical Care Facility 615 bed Office 8,759,448 sq.ft, Medical/DentalOffice 955,776 sq.ft.( Retail 5,397,968 sq.ft, Leisure Facilities 522,943 sq.ft. 37':73') nundul a:n,LUul :5:2/3,: Annual EMS ‘15 Trip Percent of Incidents in Roads eneration TotalTrips Trips and Streets Per Rate19 Generated Unit of uevempmem L43000 288,539 27.93%323 i.74000 160,506 15.54%180 2.32000 13,727 #01084 94,952 9.19%106 [03600 34,408 333%39 L03701 199,779 19.34%224 15,071 1.46%17 |.1U/ZU 4U,Ub4 5.258% Industrial/Manutacturing 15,465,470 sq.ft. Church/NoniProfit 864,390 sq.ft. cfll?nnf< Special Public Facilities 1,700,376 sq.ft. Total 15 Non»resvdenna|unns of developmem exclude srmcmred parking,5m .In all structures lavgev with more than two units plus mobile homes. 19 Daily trip genela?on rates are from the nth Edition a!Trip Generaum Rate Study for Fire Impact Fees -August 2025 [00475 [00760 Mann 73,461 6,569 ‘11: 7.11% 0.64% 82 .yhcuuu 34,133 3.1170 #02259 38,411 372%43 1,033,005 1,158 gleJamIVVum Include duplexes.Mum-family residennzl Includes unus my the Insmute niTranspDnalion E ngineers [ITE]. 53 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Exhibit 3-38 summarizes the results of the an muucm:w u wmumauun u.ul:LIVIJ undue-u types (from Exhibit 3-36)and the allocation c generation rates (from Exhibit 3-37). Exhibit 3-38.Total EMS Incidents by Land Use Annual Property Relate [and [ant Multi-Family Residential 5,954 alysis of EMS incidents.The total annual EMS >uIIuLatcu alllUlls uucu Ichpullbcb lU lallu u): ‘f incidents in roads and streets based on trip 11 Annual EMS Incidents in Assigned Tm"Amma'EMS Incidents by Land Use to Land Use 323 6,099 Hotel/MoteI/Resort Medical Care Facility nu-,, UTTICE “US Medical/DentalOffice 271 Leisure Facilities 81 Restaurant/Lounge 130 Industrial/Manufacturing 129 Church/Non-Profit 57 Education 198 Special Public Facilities 56 Total 14,723 1,158 Rate Study for Fire Impact Fees -August 2025 54 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) The final step in determining the annual EMS i nEuLde;un&-.|a......|a».LAIIIUII.4-4:.nu:«ma:ullllual L I.)luuucllt:w divided by the number of dwelling units or squa‘ incident rate per dwelling unit or square foot.T| Onuacuwabalsl Exhibit 3-39 show how many times an average the RRFA responds. uucuu m wuua allu auccu w Exhibit 3-39.Annual EMS Incident Rate by Land Use Total Annual EMS Lana use lvpe Incluenls Anrmuxeu to Land Use cident rate per unit of development is shown in .—an”!.un [cram «.0.u eaw type u.new we \uum Lmuuu J'Joy we re feet of structures to calculate the annual EMS 1e units of development are the same that were 0 2,20\Th;m;hm“Ianu use Lyyc.)\acc LAI 1it of development has an EMS incident to which uu J’JJ].I c Icauu.)I Annual EMS units 01 uevelopment Incluents Per unit of Development Hotel/Motel/Resort 240 Medical Ca re Facility 354 Office 515 Medical/DentalOffice 310 Industrial/Manufacturing 211 d.u.0 1993249 23,814 d.u.0.2575922 1,850 room 0 1296689 615 bed 0 5752554 0 0000588 955,776 sq.ft.0.0003241 5,397 958 sq‘ft.00002454 5‘15 Ann/I517313,133 :0].IL u.uuu40/I 15,465,470 sq.ft.0.0000136 Special Public Facilities 99 Total 15,831 Rate Study for Fire Impact Fees -August 2025 1,700,376 sq‘ft‘o‘oooossz 55 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) iv.Formula F-11:EMS Incident Capi The capital cost of EMS incidents per unit of deve EMS incidents per unit ofdevelopment (from E x(Exhibit multiplying that result times the useful life ofth- Annual EMS Incidents Annual C( :mmm; perUnitof Development A EMS Inc There are no new variables used in formula F- formula r-8 but using th Incident rates and co tal Cost per Unit of Development ‘Iopment is determined by multiplying the annual hibit 3-39)times the annual capital cost per EMS 34)(from 3-12). e apparatus or fire station. Useful Life of )5(Per EMS Incident Capital nnr|lni1 ident .Stauon Development 11.The variables are identical to those used in 5135instead 01'tire/other incident rates and COStS. In Exhibit 3-40 through Exhibit 3-52,each EMS the annual capital cost per EMS incident.The r apparatus or station to calculate the capital apparatus and station. ncident rate (from Exhibit 3-39)is multiplied by esult is then multiplied by the useful life of the ost per unit of development for each type of Rate Study for Fire Impact Fees -August 2025 56 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Exhibit 3-40 calculates the EMS related capital :Aalllplc,Mllsle'lallluy chluclulal mm)avm ask: an EMS incident peryear).Multiplying this by th: Exhibit 3-34)results in a cost of $12.32 per dwe (int-n awning an “mm";“a,"Jlllloc m:any”:man.w.avcrus:AJ.I L ycala u for 13.71 times the annual rate,for a total of 5 1 Exhibit 3-40.Engine Cost of Response to EMS Incide Unit of AnnualLandUseTypeDevelopmentlnciden :osts of an engine per unit of development.For ”A...mummy LIVIJ Illuuellm pe-ycal \..e.,um u. 3 annual capital cost of $61.81 per incident (from Hing unit to provide it with engines for one year. angry","AAA,”anuuvclasc,m:Icalucll a.uwclulls llccu)w yay 68.91. nts,per Unit of Development Engine cast at $61.81 Engine Life Cost per per EMS Incident,per Unit of Development [nit EMS t Rate Ibul‘.v:"nun—nay Single-Fa milvResidential d.u. Mul -Fa mily Residential u_._|/M_._un___,. pvuulel/meson U.J.L:1l MedicalCareFacility bed 0.5752 sq. Medical/DentalOfficesq.ft.0.0003 Retail sq.ft.0.0002 Leisure Faclllties sq.ft.0.0002 Restaurant/Lounge sq.ft.0.000: Industrial/Manufacturing sq.ft.0.000! Church/Non-Profit sq.ft.0.000! Education students 0.009: 3249 512.3203 5168,9109 5922 $153218 52182875 on”may 90.0““))1u:0034 2554 535.5565 $487.4801 1679 50.5852 58.0233 Special Public Facilities sq.ft,0.000! Rate Study for Fire Impact Fees -August 2025 )582 $00036 $00493 57 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Exhibit 3-41 calculates the capital cost per unit H.“muucuu.m:muucm um:\num LAIIIUH.J'JJ/ incident ($11.90 from Exhibit 3—34),The result life of a ladder to calculate the capital cost per Exhibit 3-41.Ladder Cost of Response to EMS lncide Un"07 AnnUal Development Inciden Single-Family Residential d.u‘0.199= Multi-Family Residential d.u.0.257! of development for ladders responding to EMS "u.”A.I)mumyueu uy we luuucl Lupllul w“ycl LIVIJ s then multiplied by the 18-year average useful nit of development for ladders. nts,per Unit of Development Ladder Cos:at $11.90 Ladder Life Cast perEMS n of Development 18-Vear life 3249 $2.37 5416954 5922 53.07 555.1762 Hotel/MoteI/Resort room 0.1291 Medical Care Facility bed 0.5752 nu-,,,,UTTICE Sq.TE.U.UUU| Medical/DentalOffice sq.ft.0.0003 Leisure Facilities sq.ft.0.0002 Restaurant/Lounge sq.ft.0.000: Industrial/Manufacturing sq.ft.0.000! Church/Non-Pro?t sq.ft.0.000: Education students 0.009: Special Public Facilities sq.ft,0.000! 5589 $1.54 327.7751 2554 $6.85 5123.2197 \rnn a».Adar1356)UJJU puuuc» 3241 $0.00 50.0694 1679 $0.11 $20280 3582 $0.00 $00125 Rate Study for Fire Impact Fees -August 2025 58 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Exhibit 3-42 calculates the capital cost per unit ”amuucun.mu:muumu mu:\num LNHUIL J'JJII incident ($2099 from Exhibit 3-34).The result i slifeofanaidvehicletocalculatethecapitalcost Exhibit 3-42.Aid Vehicle Cost of Response to EMS I n Uni‘of Annua unu the Inn:Development Incider Single-Family Residential Lin.0199 Multi-Fa mily Residential d.u.0.257 of development for aid units responding to EMS ?~|N”.3 Hlulupllcu uy me mu mm Luplkal um pet LIVIJ then multiplied by the nine-year average useful per unit of development for aid units. cidents,per Unit of Development Aid Vehicle Cost at Aid Vehicle l EMS $20.99 per EMS per Unit of It Rate Incident,per Unit of Development at Development 9-Year life 3249 34.1838 $37.6545 5922 55.4069 $486617 Hotel/Motel/Resort room 0.129 Medical Care Facility bed 0.575 Office sq.ft.0.000 Medical/DentalOffice sq.ft.0.000 KetaII LeisureFacilities deauranr? w... Industrial/Manufacturing sq.ft. Church/Non-Profit sq.ft. students 0.009 SpecialPublic Fac ies sq.ft.0.000 Rate Study for Fire Impact Fees -August 2025 59 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Exhibit 3-43 calculates the capital cost per unit a.“ Icapullullls w LIVIJ meme-nu.me umuem I uLc‘ materials vehicle capital cost per EMS inciden multiplied by the 21-year average useful life of may (m.Luna,-myua.unu ycv ulm u.ucvclupulclll .w ”mum“. Exhibit 3-43.Hazardous Materials Vehicle Cost of R e Unit of AnnualLandUseTypeDevelopmentIncident Single-Family Residential d.u.0.1993 )f development for hazardous materials vehicles nun.”mun 4-4:,I:“lump-mu uy m:ll?LuluUu) t (5005 from Exhibit 3-34).The result is then a hazardous materials vehicles to calculate the ”?gural,ma mum mu vellluco. spouse to EMS Incidents.per Unit of Development Halaruaus Materials nataruous materials EMS Vehicle Cost at $005 per Vehicle Life Cost per Rate EMS Incident,per Unit Unit of Development at of Development Zl-Vear life 249 50.0100 $02093 Multi--FamilyResidentiald.u.0,2575 Hotel/Motel/room 0.1296 Medical Care Facility bed 0.5752 Off'sq.ft.0.0000 Medical/Dental Umce sq.ft.U.UUUS sq.ft.0.0002 ..1 _....... sq.ft.0.0004 Industrial/Manufacturing sq.ft.0.0000 Church/Non-Profit sq.ft.0.0000 Education students 0.0094 Special Public Facilities sq.ft.0.0000 582 $0.0000 $0.0001 Rate Study for Fire Impact Fees -August 2025 60 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Exhibit 3-44 calculates the capital cost per unit (cm... LIVIJ muucun.mu:muucm um:\num LNumL J' per EMS incident ($0.00 from Exhibit 3-34).The useful life of a brush truck to calculate the capits Exhibit 3-44.Brush Truck Cost of Response to EMS I r Development lncidemLandUseType of development for brush trucks responding to an,I)muluyueu uy me u.uall uuem Lapllal um result is then multiplied by the 15-year average 2|cost per unit of development for brush trucks. ncidents,per Unit of Development Brush Truck cast at Brush Truck Life Cost my F.... late per Unit of Development at Development 15-Vear Life $0.0000 $0.0000 mum mum,ulcaluclluul u.u.v.5414. Hotel/Motel/Resort room 0.129“ Medical Care Facility bed 0.57525 Retail sq.ft.0.0002! Leisure Facilities sq.ft.0.00012 Restaurant/Lounge sq.ft.0.0004“ I d str'l/Manufacturing sq.ft.0.00002 LnLlI'Cn/l‘lOn-PTOTII sq.TI.U.UUUU. Education students 0.00946 Special .“gunlvvv VVNVVV 589 $0.000!)$0.0000 354 50.0000 50.0000 54 30.0000 30.0000 £70 $0.000!)50.0000 S77 [36 30.0000 puuuuu 30.0000 $00000 Rate Study for Fire Impact Fees -August 2025 61 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Exhibit 3-45 calculates the capital cost per unit 0 1 &»w qu muueuu.In:muumu nu:\nvm mm capital cost per EMS incident ($0.00 from Exhib ivearaverageusefullifeofacommand vehi (m— ucvcvuyvllclu w.Luuuuuuu vcumca. Exhibit 3-45.Command Vehicle Cost of Response to Unit of AnnualLandUseTypeDevelopmentIncident Single-Fa mily Residential d.u.0.1993 ‘development for command vehicles responding *:r\|:r\!‘p—nmm-n,‘uu J'JJI m Inuluylleu uv m:wmmunu vmuu: ‘t 3-34).The result is then multiplied by the ten— ‘cle to calculate the capital cost per unit of EMS Incidents,per Unit of Development (‘nmmanll EMS at $0.00 per EMS Life Cast per Unit of Rats Incident,per Unit of Development at Development 10-Vear Life 249 50.0000 50.0000 Multi-FamilyResidential d.u.0.2575 H t I/M tel/Resort room Medical Lare I'BCIIIty bed 0.3/51 Office sq.ft.0.0000 Lelsu re Faculltles sq.ft.0.0001 Restaurant/Lounge sq.ft.0.0004 Industrial/sq.ft.0.0000 Church/Non-Profit sq.ft.0.0000 Education students 0.0094 Special Public Facilities sq.ft 0.0000 582 50.0000 50.0000 Rate Study for Fire Impact Fees -August 2025 62 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Exhibit 3-46 calculates the capital cost per unit c LIVIJ "mm-nu).In:muumn um:\nvm Lmnuu cost per EMS incident ($1009 from Exhibit 3 — 3averageusefullifeofadiveapparatustocalcul rung.”mane-”eulv:upyuimuo. Exhibit 3-46.Dive Apparatus Cost of Response to E N Unit of AnnualLandUseTypeDevelopmentIncident Single-Family Residential d.u.0.19932 yf development for dive apparatus responding to rm,.3 Illulupllcu uy ulc ulv:uppmukub Laplhal 4).The result is then multiplied by the 21-year ate the capital cost per unit of development for 1SIncidents,per Unit of Development manyywm...w...“munyymmw u... MS $10.05 per EMS Incident,Cost per Unit of late per Unit of Development at Development 21-Vear Life Z49 52.0112 542.2350 Multi-Family Residential d.u.0.25755 H t I/M tel/Re rt m 0.12966 Medical Lare I'BCIIIty bed U.b/bl: Office sq.ft.0.00005 Lelsu re Faculltles sq.ft.0.00012 Restaurant/Lounge sq.ft.0.00046 Industrial/sq.ft.0.00002 Church/Non-Profit sq.ft.0.0000". Education students 0.00946 Special Public Facilities sq.ft.0.00005 354.5812 527.4755 582 50.0006 50.0123 Rate Study for Fire Impact Fees -August 2025 63 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Exhibit 3-47 calculates the capital cost per unit ”hIdle Wu...Lmuuu J'JJ}I)mumpncu uy m:as“ Exhibit 3-34)The result is then multiplied by th to calculate the capital cost per unit of developr Exhibit 3-47.Service Vehicle Cost per EMS Incident “ Unit of Annual Lana use Iype Development lncidentl Single-Family Residential d.u.0.19932 Multi-Family Residential d.u.0.25752 If development for service vehicles.The incident n~ni¢-l human;(tn (m...me vemue Lapllul w»pen Hluuclu me nun. e 15-year average useful life of a service vehicle nent for service vehicles. per Unit of Development Service Vehicle LifeServiceVecIeCostat Cost per Unit ofMM,MS >u.uu per lncluent,perlateUnitofDevelopment Development at 15—Vearlife 149 $00000 $00000 922 $0.0000 $0.0000 Hotel/MoteI/room 0.1296E Medical Care Facility bed 0.57525 sq.ft.0.00005 Medical/DentalOf?ce sq.ft.0.00032 Retail sq.ft.0.00021 LeisureFacilities sq.ft.0.00012 mm“.ncatuululIL/Lvullsc M1.u.u.vvv-l\ Industrial/sq.ft.0.00002 Profit sq.ft.0.0000". students 0.0094£ Special Public Fac ties sq.ft.0.00005 Rate Study for Fire Impact Fees -August 2025 64 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Exhibit 3»48 calculates the capital cost per unit r§”ml; lul:Wu...Luuuu J'JJI I:Iliulupllcu uy we at Exhibit 3-10).The result is then multiplied by th calculate the capital cost per unit of developmel Exhibit 3—48.Staff Vehicles Cost of Response to EMS Unit of Annual Lana use Iype Development lncidentl Single-Family Residential d.u.0.19932 Multi-Family Residential d.u.0.25752 of development for staff vehicles.The incident [(1 (m...m vellum:Luplkal wu pen muucm \gAJ.)mm. a 15-year average useful life of a staff vehicle to wt for staff vehicles, Incident,per Unit of Development Staff Vehicle Life CastStaffVehicleCostatperUnitof M,, MS )1.”per IncluEnl’,per“‘2 Unit of Develupment Development at 15—Vearlife 149 30.3847 $57705 322 $0.4972 $7.4573 Hotel/MoteI/room 0.12966 Medical Care Facility bed 0.57525 sq.ft.0.00005 Medical/DentalOf?ce sq.ft.0.00032 Retail sq.ft.0.00021 LeisureFacilities sq.ft.0.00012 mm“.ncatuululIL/Lvullsc M1.u.u.vvv-l\ Industrial/sq.ft.0.00002 Profit sq.ft.0.0000". students 0.0094E Special Public Fac ties sq.ft.0.00005 Rate Study for Fire Impact Fees -August 2025 65 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Exhibit 3-49 calculates the capital cost per unit “hlul:Wu...meu 4-4:,I)«Ilulupllcu uy we uul Exhibit 3-10).The result is then multiplied by the calculate the capital cost per unit of developmel Exhibit 3-49.Utility Vehicle Cost of Response to EM S UM 0‘Annual Development Incident Single-Family Residential d.u.0.19932 Multi-Family Residential d.u.0.25752 of development for utility vehicles‘The incident a;IC')uy veil-Me LapILaI w»pm muumu pg.”mm. a 15-year average useful life of a utility vehicle to it for utility vehicles. i Incident,per Unit of Development Utility Vehicle Cost at Utility Vehicle Life CastMS$2.71 Unit of Development $05402 922 50.6981 510.4711 Hotel/MoteI/Resort room 0.12966 Medical Care Facility bed 0.5752E nu-,,,,Mum,UTTICE sq.TL U.UUUU: Medical/DentalOffice sq.ft.0.00032 Leisure Facilities sq.ft.0.00015 Restaurant/Lounge sq.ft.0.0004“ Industrial/Manufacturing sq.ft.0.00002 Church/Non-Pro?t sq.ft.0.00007 Education students 0.0094E Special Public Facilities sq.ft.0.00005 589 $013514 35.2710 954 $15589 $233841 Ann'u 5». 579 $0.0257 $0.3849 382 $0.0002 $0.0024 Rate Study for Fire Impact Fees -August 2025 66 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Exhibit 3-50 calculates the capital cost per uni' Fylnihif --.,,\. ($0.49 from Exhl t 3-10).The result IS then m small utility vehicle to calculate the capital cost Exhibit 3-50.Small Utility Vehicle Cost of Response! Unit of Annual I Development Incident Single»Family Residential d.u.0.19932 Mul -Fa mily Residential t of development for small utility vehicles.The ultlplied by the 15-year average useful life of 3 )er unit of development for small utility vehicles‘ ‘0 EMS Incident,per Unit of Development Small Utility Vehicle Small Utlllty Vehicle Cost Life Cost per Unit 0'MS .._,”~-.ate Unit ofDevelopment Development at 15-Year Life 49 50.0977 51.4650 Hotel/Motel/Resort room 0.12966 Medical Care Faullty bed 0.57525 Office sq‘ft.0.00005 Medical/DentalOffice sq.ft.000032 M4.n.u.uuu4q LEISUre Facilities sq.ft.0,00018 Restaurant/Lounge sq.ft.0,00046 Industrial/Manufacturing sq.ft.0.00001 Church/Non-Profit sq.ft.0.00007 Education students 000946 SpecialPublicFac sq.ft.0 00005 ‘88 50.0000 50.0004 Rate Study for Fire Impact Fees -August 2025 67 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Exhibit 3-51 calculates the capital cost per unit( Fylnihif ...‘. per incident ($0.76 from Exhibit 3-10).The resuil life of other apparatus/equipment to calculate t lannarahn/enuinment, Exhibit 3-51.Other Apparatus/Equipment Cost of Re Unit of AnnualLandUseTYPEDevelopmentIncident _._nanni— blllgle-l’d?l y ne>|uenud|u.u.U.J.:1:JJ: )f development for other apparatus/equipment. :nn:r:h|</9nllinmnnf ~,.-r,_ .Is then multiplied by the 15-year average useful er 1e capital cost per unit of development for other sponse to EMS Incident,per Unit of Development DtherAnparatus/Equin otherADnaratus/Equin MS Cost-at$0.76 'peé ' Life cés'tper unit'of' iate Incident,per Unit of Development at Development 15»Vear Life 14:7 QU.J.3J.3 94.4ILD Multi--FamilyResidentiald.u.0.2575E room 0.12966 (7:75 sq.ft.0.00005 Office sq.ft.0.00032 sq.ft.0.00021 Leisure Faci ies sq.ft.0.00012 Restaurant/Lounge sq.ft.0.0004E Industrial/sq.ft.0.00002 Church/Non-Pro?t sq.ft.0.0000". Education students 0.0094( _ DPECIEI ruullc racmues sq.n.U.UUU 322 50.1958 52.9366 389 50.0985 31.4782 (A )OL DU.UUUU DU.UUUI Rate Study for Fire Impact Fees -August 2025 68 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Exhibit 3-52 calculates the capital cost per unitt :nn:r:h|<Fylnihir' per ?re/other and EMS Incident ($67,117 from 50-year useful life of a fire station to calculate <tatinns, Exhibit 3-52.Fire Station Cost of Response to EMS I n Unit of AnnualLandUseTypeDevelopmentIncident _._ blllgle-l’d?l y ne>|uenud|u.u.may: 3f development for fire stations that house EMS (farinn r:nif:|.-,‘ xhlblt 3-12)‘The result Is then multiplied by the :he capital cost per unit of development for fire cident,per Unit of Development Fire Station Life Cost.Hre Manon Lost at:MS _per Unit of Rate $67.17 per Incident,per Development atUnitofDevelopmentSD-Vear Life 44:7 QLD.DOOI 90027.43 Multi--FamilyResidentiald.u.0.2575 Hotel/Motel/room 0,1296 (7:? sq.ft.0.0000 Office sq.ft.0.0003 0.0002 Leisure Faci ies sq.ft.0.0001 Restaurant/Lounge sq.ft.0.0004 Industrial/sq.ft.0.0000 Church/Non-Pro?t sq.ft.0.0000 Education students 0.0094 _ DPECIEI ruullc racmues sq.n.u.uuuu 922 5173025 $865.12 689 58.7099 $435.49 (EA (292 DOA DU.UU35 DU.LU Rate Study for Fire Impact Fees -August 2025 69 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Exhibit 3-53 combines the capital costs of all ty uuuusu LAIIHJII.J'JLI w wuvv we LULuI Lapllal u single-family residential development, Exhib'3-53.Example of Calculation of Total Cost o Residential Dwelling Unit Cost Component Cost Engine $168.91 Ladder $42.70 pes of apparatus and station (from Exhibit 3-40 a.»J)L u:hubpulwch LU LIVIJ uluuclub nu:uuc mm m Response to EMS Incidents for a Single-Family HazardousMaterialsVehicle Brush Truck CommandVehicle $0.00 Dive Apparatus $42.23 S 'ceV h'Ie $0.00 Staff Vehicle $5.77 $8.10 Small Utility Vehicle $1.47 umc.Lqu.,4.u:m,n,4,w.mw 45.41 Fire Station $669.43 Total $978.75 Rate Study for Fire Impact Fees -August 2025 70 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) This example is repeated for each land use to co ~npl pa-u:nn. allu >Luuvu>m Lmnuu J'J‘Q. Exhibit 3-54.Total Capital Cost of Response to EMS Land Use Type Unit of Development Single-Family Residential d.u. Medical Care Facility bed mbine its capital costs of all types of apparatus ncidenls,per Unit of Development EMSIncidents:Life Cost per Unit of Development of All Apparatus 81Stations $97875 $2,824.69 Restaurant/Lounge sq.TI. Industrial/sq.ft. Special Public Facilities sq.ft. IUIIIIuIaI _J.L-I ULCII LaUDL PCI UIII L UI IJCVCIUPIIICI IL The fire/other and EMS costs per unit of develop the total fire/otherand EMS cost per dwelling u Formula F712: Firelncident Capital Cost Per Unit of Development E MPe Inere are no new varlanles used In Tormula r- formulas and exhibits. Rate Study for Fire Impact Fees -August 2025 ment are combined in Exhibit 3-55 to determine nit or nonresidential square foot. S Incident Capital Cost Total Cost of Response Per rUnI‘of Development Unit of Development ll.DOU‘Val’laDleS were developed In preVIous 71 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Exhibit 3-55.Total Cost of Response to All Incidents Fire/ OHIELife(20: Appar Unit ofLandUseTypeDevelopment Juauu Cost of Fl y Single-Family Residential d.u.$24 Multi-FamilyResidentialHotel/MoteI/Resort d.u. room Medical Lare I'ECIIItY bed 558 by Land Use Category er Incident EMS Incident Life Tatal Cost of Response st of All Cost oi All to EMS,Fire,&other alus &Apparatus 8.Incidents Per Unit of mm“"mm“.n,...-|~.‘....‘-.nun“.- 9.....qu lung-cu ucvcluylllulll uy mllu re/O?ler)Cost of EMS)Use Category 397 $978.75 $1,222.71 0.67 $1,264.86 $1,725.53 5.2!)$2,824b9 $3,409.94 OfficeMedical/DentalOf?ce $0 $0 neLdII LeisureFacilities Restaurant/Lounge Church/Non-Proflt sq‘ft.$0 Industrial/Manufacturing sq.ft.$0 Education students $ 53 Special Public Facilities sq.ft.$0 Rate Study for Fire Impact Fees -August 2025 72 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) b.CAPITALPROJECTSELIGIBLEF( As discussed in Section 3.2,the City is expected growth,and the new development associated pmeruenrv re<nnn<p proportion of those needs that are related to identify the proportion of capital facility costs Following projects at stations needed to increase operatic Projected Growth in the RRFASe Fyhihif )R IMPACT FEES to grow during the period of 2025 to 2031.This ‘ith it,will create increased demands for fire and nrniprf:inrrpamd..,_._ expected growth within the City only‘This is to i that can be funded with City fire impact fee growth—related nal capacity for emergency response. ‘rvice Area =<um|l urnu?'ln_e F”...--,.. projections for the years 2025 through 2031,10 grow by 10,799 residents,of which 9,405 are C igrnwrhzrpa ,V Exhibit 3-56.RRFA Service Area Population and Pro] Description City of Renton Population KCFD 25 Population KCFD 40 Population TotalServiceArea Population City ofRentonShare of Population Growth ii.2031 Incident Projections .-.,.-b. The total service area population is expected to ‘ty residents.This is 87%of the total population ected Growth 2024 Growth 2025-2031 108,584 9,405 138,195 10,799 87% The number of incidents in the service area is compares population estimates area to total e 21 continue.By 2031,the rate is assumed to be 01 ~41 10 Source:City of Ramon projections ave from PSRC,KCFDZS and KCFD 42‘source:Kenton RFA Planning section Rate Study for Fire Impact Fees -August 2025 expected to grow with population.Exhibit 3—57 mergency incidents for the years 2021 through rat; 873. n ale (ram the Office of Financial Management (om). 73 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Exhibit 3-57.Total Incidents Per Capita,RRFA Servic Description A;DN‘M» Z K \.I|.y u.ncmun rupumuun n10, KCFD25Population KCFD 40 Population Total Service Area Population 134, Total Incidents 18, Total Incident per Capita E A163 121 2022 2023 2024 10:1no 1no {on {17 22,148 21,852 21,885 504 137,995 138,142 138,195 [81 19,185 20,370 20,786 359 0.1390 0.1475 0.1504 As shown in Exhibit 3-56,the City is projected tc 3-58 shows the projected number of annual inci using the projected incidents per capita rate for Exhibit 3-58.Projection of Annual Incidents Associa l Description City of Renton Projected Population Valul VVGVfoyvtlv'jgv2026—2031 3,4u Incidents per Capita,2031 0187 Annual mClOenIS ASSOCIBIEU WIIn UIV of Renton Population Growth 1’ 76 {-Inn i grow by 9,405 between 2025 and 2031.Exhibit dents associated with this growth in population, 2031. :ed with City of Renton Growth,2031 KKPA AnaIVSISOT LIIYOT Kenton rorecast ,V RRFA projection basédon hisfoi'ic‘t‘reria‘“ 7 (2021-2024) Z RRFA Calculation through {-L‘rnnm0:44,we nnrH upeuaneu vvlul seven nun line Aid Units.Exhibit 3-59 presents baseline responses per front-line apparatus Unlike thl (irn/nthnr Ar?'c:uvul my...auu ...c,umc.”mum.”L. measure represents the total annual response c of projecting service demands in 2031,this anal' \...-,m...“MM,In: between 2021 and 2024. .9“......mummy Rate Study for Fire Impact Fees -August 2025 e:cuisine),uuu num-u:muucn auu uncc num- .responses per incident and average annual .calculations in Chapter 3,these calculations Age-Arming rnrhnncnu:Icayvllac .mcs ,lc."mum...nus apacity for each type of vehicle.For the purpose ysis assumes the proportion of incidents by type LIUII I.)aural-lulu...“Ivy ullulyglg Ul ”Honolulu.uuhu 74 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Exhibit 3-59.Baseline Front-Line Apparatus Respons Apparatus Caunt of Front-Annual Type Line Apparatus Responses I n Imam, I LJleU Ladder 1 1,327 Aid Unit 4 9,144 Total Exhibit 3-60 calculates the number of addi projected in the City.First it calculated projectec ‘.es per Incident,2025 \nnual Response Rate Annual Responses per \cidents per Incident Front-Line Apparatus 97¢: unhagv A,UIJ 0.0638 1,327 0.4399 2,286 0,786 anal apparatus needed to serve new growth I growth-related responses by apparatus type by multiplying the projected growth-related annI response rate per incident from Exhibit 3-60,N -bythe annual responses per front-line apparatu: 0.59 new engines,0.08 new ladders and 0.34 ne City‘ nu ”It 343".rlujeueu prdlaw:lueeu Aauuateu I Annual Incidents Apparatus Associated w h Response Rate Iype nenwn ropulauun per Incluem Growth.2031 Engine 0.6326 Iotal 1,]bt Jal incidents from Exhibit 3-59 by the annual ext,these growth-related responses are divided 5 from Exhibit 360‘It shows that RRFA will need w Aid Units to serve projected growth inside the mm Lucy In nemun uluwm,LuLu -LUJJ. Annual Additional Front—Line Responses per Apparatus Needed to Projected lrowth—Related rmnt-une nerve Kenton umwm,Responses Apparatus 2031 1,115 1,879 059 112 1,327 0.08 775 2,286 0.34 Rate Study for Fire Impact Fees -August 2025 75 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Exhibit 3-61 shows the planned apparatus addit (eruira 2|<n fleet that are associated with City growth-rela apparatus to respond to an additional 775 aid npw growth the RRFA service area will come in the form of the City‘As the growth occurs,the RRFA inten housing! ("ailiunit). Exhibit 3—61.Impact Fee Eligible Costs Associated wi ions to fleet to address anticipated needs in the tnf:| ted needs.Ex I It 3-60 identl Ies the need for mit responses and 1,227 non-aid unit responses growth infill development and increased density within ds to add additional apparatus units to address emergencv th Planned Additions to Fleet Iotal Additional l-rom-Rel aPlannedLineApparaxus:pf'ams Additions Neededto Serve 'w to Fleet Renton Growth. __Gn Engine lUlb-lUSI 0 dder Aid Unit 1 0.34 xted ta ty of Unit Cost 01 Impact Fee Cost 0'Future nlon ApparatusZZ Eligible Costs Reserve Capacity )wth. 3-2051 7%$0 So so /%>455 1,895 >z,zu5,Ubs >5zb,ssz 7%$426,918 $371,809 $55,109 22 Unit Cost of apparatus re?ects the estimated cost in the year of repla c Rate Study for Fire Impact Fees -August 2025 :ement. 76 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) iv.System Improvement Costs Alre As discussed in Section 33,the RRFA has excess< increased emergency response staffing.Betwee staffing tc total station value associated with the station c a response operations staffing,systemwide. Exhibit 3-62.Value of Station Capacity Needed for Description )dy Incurred :apacity at stations systemwide to accommodate an 2026 and 2031,the RRFA intends to increase ‘ apacity needed to accommodate this increase in rowth-Related Response Staffing Increases Value A.Total station square feet in RRFA inventory B.Total cost per building square foot (from E x C.Total value of RRFA station inventory (A mL D.Baseline percentage of RRFA station capaci F.Percent increase in response and EMS staffi H.Percentage of projected service area growt (fromExhibit3--56) L Value ofincreased usage of station capac ,4L..u\ LILY Ul nemun gluwul \u mumpueu uy n, (from Exhibit 3-4)101,253.00 bit 3-11)$1,034.11 Iltiplied by B)$104706,881.80 tv in use (from Exhibit 3-2 )67% mg,2026-2031 18% city (EmultipliedbyF)$12,858,739.87 h Inside City of Renton 87% I needed to accommodate $11,198,856.23 Rate Study for Fire Impact Fees -August 2025 77 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Exhibit 3-63 shows the estimated debt sen/ice (an/it‘s ayrnari -rm- to accommodate response staffing needed to Therefore,the entire amount of this debt servic- Exhibit 3-63.Impact Fee Eligible Costs Associated wi Station Name Addr Fire Station iii/Maintenance on RRFA capital facilities.The anticipated debt serve Renton growth (row I in Exhibit 3-62)‘ 5 is impact fee eligible.23 th System Improvements ess Debt Service Pavments 2026-2031 $17,811,779.17 23 Note that RCW 82.02.05012)states that ”mlhe ?nancing forsystem an Impact fees.”Exhibit 3766 Idennfles other revenue Sources [a be a Rate Study for Fire Impact Fees -August 2025 improvements to serve new developmenl cannot rely solely pplled m cnmply wlth thls requirement. 78 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Summary of Impact Fee Eligible Exhibit 3-64 presents RRFA’s capital cost for app It includes both replacements to existing appar new growth. Exhibit 3-64.Capital Costs for Apparatus,2026-2031 Hvelnge Project Description Quantity Unit Cost 2026-2031 ’roject Costs )aratus during the six-year period of 2026-2031. atus as well as fleet expansions necessitated by hall-G‘s]mm Lual m rulLelIlage neuamu Illlpnu rue Year of to City of Renton Eligible Costs Replacement Growth,2026-2031 (2031) 5 $1,905,066 2 $3,004 I-uu unu HazMatVehicle Brush $0 $0 Dive Apparatus 0 $0 Service Vehicle 1 $126,598 Staff Vehicle 3 $52,034 Utility Vehicle 0 $98,014 5 Ut'l't V h'cle 0 $0 vu um Apparatus/Equipment $0 $9,525,323 $3,092,898 0% Aerial 1 Aid Unit 1 $426,918 Apparatus Total Rate Study for Fire Impact Fees -August 2025 $2,531,895 87%$2,205,063 $426,918 87%$371,809 $7,261,526 $2,576,871 79 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Exhibit 3-65 presents RRFA's capital facility cost: LUJL.n umuueu ucm scrum:paymema,anu n: proportion ofthat cost that is reasonably relate < Exhib'3-65.Capital Faci ‘ty Costs for Stations,2026- Project Description Station Debt Servicing Fire Station 16 Debt Service Payments s for stations during the six»year period of 2026- (Auvauunam:upeuauuuau Menu::1)wen a:mu: ito sewing new growth in the City of Renton. -2031 Percentage Related to City of Total Cost (2026-203 1) Impact Fee Eligible Casts $10,566,414 17%$1,796,290 Maintenance Shop Debt Service Payments Admin Headquarters Facility Improvements Fire Station 11 Facility Improvements Fire Station 12 Facility Improvements Fleet Shop Facility Improvements Tn|nlnr IUWUI I'CILIIILY IIIIIJI UVUIIIUI IL) $7,245,365 23%$1,644,693 $315,654 $480,807 0% 0% $0 $0 U/O OFM Facility Improvements Fire Station 15 Facility Improvements Fire Station 16 Current Facility Improvements Fire Station 16 Future Facility Improvements Improvements Total Station Costs Rate Study for Fire Impact Fees -August 2025 $98,004 $31,656,935 0% 0% $0 $0 $51,783,712 $3,440,988 80 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) c.IMPACT FEE RATE ADJUSTME Exhibit 3-66 summarizes total impact fee e|igib|e to use for funding a portion of impact fee eligib 9*;marrpnt fp. _.~,..,. Exhibit 3-66.Impact Fee Eligible Costs Compared to Description Total Impact Fee Eligible Costs (Apparatus +Sta ITS costs and accounts for revenues that RRFA plans le costs.The remaining impact fee eligible costs a elinihlp Projected Impact Fee Revenues.2026-2031 Estimated Cost]Revenue Itions)$6,017,859 Payments TI’Om UII’ISI’Kevenue DOUI'CeS Remaining Impact Fee Eligible Costs Percentage of Impact Fee Eligible Costs to be F IRevenues Projected Impact Fee Revenues AséumingRent |hp.mm m uevelupmem Projected Revenues in Excess of Remaining Im p Impact Fee Eligible Costs as a Percentage of Revenues are impac‘ impact fee schedule equal to the full capitai co: 55.25 The remaining impact fee eligib|e costs Therefore,to avoid collecting more costs,the full capital costs per unit of developr >433,DDU Jnded With Impact Fee 95% on Adopts Total Cost Per $8,972,530 :act Fee Eligible Costs $3,254,320 mu m '[34% assuming an its per unit of development shown in Exhibit 3» mount to about 64 percent of these projected Ipact fee revenue than impact fee eligible capital nent are multiplied by 64 percent to determine the fire impact fee rate. M Assumescitvomenmnimplements an impaa iee schedule equal [GI 15 ijected impact fee [avenues ave based on piqemons provided by! (August 2025)”as shown in Appendix A. Rate Study for Fire Impact Fees -August 2025 hemucapim costs pev unit oidevelopmem shown in Exhibit 3755 he my of Kenton and cantained within the "Current Key Development 81 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Exhibit 3-67.2025 RRFA Fire Impact Fee Rate Schedt Total Ca L U U itandSEn PerUniK: Single»Family Residential d.u.$ Multi--Family Residentiald.u.$ 1 Hotel/Motel/Resort Medical Care Facility bed S E Office sq.ft. Medical/DentalOffice sq.ft. Ile ‘st oi Response Percentage Needed F'l (.1 F)fDevelopmen!for Eligible Costs Ire mpa 22 .,222.71 64%$779.24 $1,099.68 $669.37 $247346 $0.28 Restaurant/Lounge sq.ft. SpecialPublicFacilities 82.02.0500]requires development cannot rely solely on impact fees fee eligible costs used as the basis for the imp; total impact fee eligible costs. ..._1....5-].u..- improvements serve new ."As shown in Exhibit 3-67,the remaining impact :ct fee calculation amount to just 64 percent of A“L-L_I :....._-L -I:..:L.I._ ”Immune,me mug:m :xmuu 3-01,wmul are un: costs,comply with RCW82.02.050(2). Rate Study for Fire Impact Fees -August 2025 :eu un umy on pElLElll Ul LULdI unpau lee englule 82 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Appendix A:Current Legend mamas .w u m m 334 w ey Development Mapl‘S D I Am A:Woven; ADLHJ?der Skewers- 26 (mm-a-m“ Rate Study for Fire Impact Fees -August 2025 ani<n7aznna?ahm17<17nmM‘nnha 83 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Q [\Annourinn EII+|Irn J.U The GMA was enacted to provide local oversigh governments such as counties,cities,and towns GMA Goal 1 promotes placing growth in urban ar while GMA Goal 12 promotes adequate facilities (1)Urban growth.Encourage development in u services exist or can be provided in an efficient (12)Public facilities and services‘Ensure that +ql IILGI I GLI ILy I‘ICCUD t of community growth with the intent for local ‘to monitor and mitigate the Impacts of growth. 'eas where there are public faci ties and services, ;and services to support development: rban areas where adequate public facilities and nanner. :hose public facilities and services necessary to support development shall be adequate to serv< is available for occupancy and use without c established minimum standards (RCW 36.70A,02 Concurrency for transportation infrastructure is given the authority to establish concurrency gl servicp?' Purpose..The purpose of concurrency is necessawto support developn the time it is available for occu| below locally established minin Concurrency describes the sin when the impacts of developm Concurrency ensures consisten adequate public facilities a: a the development at the time the development lecreasing current service levels below locally ZO(12)). mandated by the GMA,and local agencies were Jidelines for other public needs such as water, :0 ensure that those public facilities and services lent are adequate to serve that development at Danny and use,without decreasing service levels 1um standards. nation in which adequate facilities are available lent occur,or within a specified time thereafter. cy in land use approval and the development of ;plans are implemented,and it prevents ._J._..LI:__:I:L:-__-_-___.‘..L__..___.‘J.uevelopment mat IS lnCOnSISIE the development, With respect to facilities may Tasman melr own regulat moratoria on development dur (WAC 365-196-840). The RRFA CFP identifies the need for $26.7Min1 4-2,to maintain fire service concurrency througl 5.1 LtVtL Ul'btKVIU:IVltAbUKtb RRFAmeasures LOSfrom three different perspe Capital Facilities Plan 7 August 2025 n(with me pLIDIIC TECIIIIIES necessary [0 suppurt than transportationfacilities,counties and ory responses anu are ”OK llmIIECI (O Imposing ing periods when concurrency is not maintained :apital investments as shown in Exhibits 4-1 and '1 the year 2031. ctives.The first concerns the cost of facilities for 14 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) incident response per unit of development.' r9<nnn<n”dram”.~ Protection Class (PC)rating for each of the a KDFD40).Each of these LOS measures are descri 3.1.1 Cost of Facilities for Incident Res In 2025,RRFA conducted a rate study forfire im quantifying the need for fire and EMS station purpose of collecting ?re impact fees.The level and stations to EMS and fire/other incidents. annualized facility value per incident as well as I'he second perspective concerns turnout and u ram“.m- reas served (the City of Renton,KCFDZS,and bed below. u ,.~....,~w.n.“my...“u... ponse per Unit of Development )act fees.That study presents a methodology for s and apparatus to serve new growth,for the )f service standard is the 2024 ratio of apparatus More specifically,the rate study calculates the the number of incidents produced by different kinds of development.This determines the tot; per unit of development.This standard is used ' to support incident response throughout the R Full documentation of the methodology is availa For apparatus,including engines and other resp as of 2024 was selected as an acceptable LOS occur,and therefore more apparatus will be ne that much of the growth in the RRFA service are. increased density within the City.As the grov apparatus units to address the anticipated (aid unit). For fire stations,the rate study measures L Oincidents.However,a deduction to the square f could accommodate additional fire and eme ll cost of facilities for incident response needed to measure the systemwide capacity of facilities FA service area. bie in the rate study.A brief summary follows. onse vehicles,the ratio of apparatus to incidents ;tandard.As growth occurs,more incidents will eded to maintain this standard.It is anticipated a will come in the form of infill development and 1th occurs,the RRFA intends to add additional increase in multi—story housing (ladder)and 5 using the ratio of station square footage to ootage is made to account for unused beds that rgency response staff‘As stated above,it is antiCIpated that much of the growth in the R Fdevelopmentandincreaseddensitywithinthe utilize excess bed capacity in current stations to existing stations. On the next page,Exhibit 3-1 shows the cost of <n||ars <tudpn? -‘1‘.._.‘..vv..,.vv...,v.........II .1,n...“v.--'—~‘ for Fire Impact Fees.These represent the total need to make to maintain the current level of s {-hn {-n pharanrl ”UL IIUL LI IC GUI-Mal III C IIIIPUDL ICC LU MC DI Ialsc Capital Facilities Plan 7 August 2025 {FA serVIce area will come In the form or Infill City.As this growth occurs,the RRFA intends to increase its capacity for emergency response at 'esponse per unit of development (dwelling unit, 707‘;Qfm‘lv amount of facility investment the RRFA would ervice as growth occurs within the service area, 15 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Exhibit 3-1.Total Cost of Response by Land Use Land Use Type Unit of Develo| Single-Family Residential d.u. Mul-Fami|v Residential d.u. Hotel/MoteI/Resort room MedicalCareFacility bed Medical/DentalOffice Category Total Cost of Response to EMS,Fire,&Other ament _.Incidents,Per Unit of Development“ $779.24 $2,173,15 “Restaurant/Lounge sq.ft. Education Speual Public Facilities 3.1.2 Turnout and Response Time Star Traffic and geographic barriers currently present in some areas.Forthis reason,RRFA also has tur performance across the entire service area and Turnout and response time standards are docurr Idards challenges to providing adequate response time nout and response time standards for measuring by individual station. Iented SOP 4101 "Response Guidelines".First, this policy addresses turnout times,or the interv is received by firefighters from the 911 center ar emergent hundred twenty seconds."Second,this policy begins with notification and ends with the time ' :(nira:(ihiafinn equipment,to respond to 90%of the emergenc from the time of dispatch." These standards are summarized in Exhibit 3-2. 4 Source RRFA Rate Study forFIre Impac:Fees,2025 Capital Facilities Plan 7 August 2025 al that begins when audible or visual notification id ends at the beginning point oftravel time.SOP expedient longer addresses response times,or th interval that the unit arrives on scene.SOP 4101 states:“The (faf?na,,.....n.3,m... :y service calls within 7 minutes and 30 seconds 16 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Exhibit 3-2.Response Time Level of Service Star Service Standard Turnout time for emergency response First unit arrival _._ IVIEESLII'Ing response (ImE "EIPS KKFH (D luenun also helps to identify where current conditions geographic barriers are presenting challenges to example,Hre SISIIOI'IS ii and 1b are multl»ston ”4‘ Idards Response Time Meet Response Time Goal 120 seconds 100% utes and 30 seconds the time of dispatch “1.1:“rwnere aaumonal CEpECIIy may ue necessary.It such as station design,local traffic,land use,or responding to incidents in a timely manner.For (buildings that require response crews to travel ....|mm:a heLuIIu >luly LU me maul story In omen compared to a single-story station.Similarly,th commercial development outside of the Fire Sta meeung me response standard and Impacts resp The response time level of service standards for Exhibit 3-3.2024 Response Time Level of Servic: ln/Outof Jurisdidion Turnoul InJurisdiction OutofJurisdiction Exhibi‘3-4.2024ResponseTime Level of Servic n ln/Outof Jurisdiction Turnaut LU Ie>pullu,mu)"meaning men lumum ume e increased density of multi-family housing and tion 11 response area reduces the probability of ‘OI'ISS [”119 level OT SeI'VICE for [n81 property type, 2024 are displayed in Exhibit 33 and 3-4. 3 Standards for Fire/Other time under 120 seconds Response time under 7.5m 54,57”/ 55.14%:83.11%; 3 Standards for EMS time under 120 seconds Response time under 7.5m Out of Jurisdiction Capital Facilities Plan 7 August 2025 74.55%96.27% 71 94%95.13% 17 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) 3.1.3 Washington Surveying Rating B A Washington Surveying Rating Bureau (WSRB) represents the community-provided fire protect PC of 1 indicates exemplary fire protection capa protection capabilities,if any,are not sufficient in Washington state has a PC,which is used as In 2018,the City’s PC was upgraded from a Class City’s 2024 WSRB rating.This rating places the the state in terms of protection class ratings.In reau Protection Class protection class (PC)is a score from 1 to 10 that ion capabilities available at a specific property.A bilities are available;a PC of 10 indicates the fire to receive credit for insurance.Each community starting point to determine the PC of individual 3 to a Class 2.5 This rating was maintained in the Iity in the top 5.6%in the country and top 2.4%in July of 2022,the City of Seattle became the first and only fire department in the state to achieve Exhibit 3-5.City of Renton 2024 PC Rating PC Ratings Cnunlrywide .1.s The improvements made to fire and life safety have led to this outstanding upgrade In PL Tori PC is one of the key factors in insurance prem represent exceptional fire and life safety prote< even greater opportunity to realize insurance a Class 1 PC. PC Ratings Statewide (2024) throughout Renton over the past several years :he Kenton community‘Because a community's ium determination,not only does this upgrade on,but Renton property owners also have an -premium savings.KCFDZS and KCFD40 both maintain a FL.OT mass 5. A community's PC rating is evaluated using the f :m.|.nu:uepuun equipment,and personnel trail lII.rum],muL Watersupply(35%),including InamLenanLe. Emergency communications staffing,and training. -Fire safety control (16%),inclu fire investigations,and public f i around me-{oumgl State Wide PC Ratings were published'In the Capital Facilities Plan 7 August 2025 allowing criteria: A;mm;umuuuuuu u.“mums,mam-.5 IEVEI), 1mg. water flow capacity,fire hydrant location,and system (9%),including dispatching system, ding fire code and building code enforcement, re education programs. menu.”mm/r.,m.m,..wpzum:,,m,e.n..m,,Mnmmmam, (5 Protection Class Repay:for Reman,dated April 1,201A. AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Because the PC criteria that most affect the over of resources for fire protection,the RRFA must and deployment that supports its current PC requires a ladder to be positioned within 2.5 roa a single ladder located at Fire Station 11 in dov mile radius of Fire Station 11in comparison to It second ladder is required to address the growth Exhibit 3-6.Fire Station 11 Ladder with 2.5 Roa 1 ’v we all rating are the fire operations and deployment maintain the fire protection apparatus,staffing, rating as growth occurs.For example,WSRB 121miles ofa given structure.The RRFA maintains vntown Renton.Exhibit 3-6 shows the 2.5 road Ie projected new development within the City.A in these areas. 1 Mile Radius rmm nounuirv D .4 (nmmwlrz\/M|Hmhmlluhunk @ mm“-mm“.w, Rina: Capital Facilities Plan 7 August 2025 «un?lg?nd‘m H.3 w.qmm 15um"...mum wwwa... ‘V 19 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Some of the City-projected developments that w 6 Exhibit 3-7.Highlighted City of Renton Planned ill require a ladder response are shown in Exhibit Development 11"1'T:“1015;: m:III 5 Sourcezmtyofkemom?mmn i hli v ?nale 2 m ism"ac Capital Facilities Plan 7 August 2025 cessed 07/23/2025. 20 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Capital Facilities Plan 7 August 2025 21 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) HHU IUICLGDL UI I uLuICIGL The following is a summary of capital facility nee 4.1 APPARATUS FACILITYNEEDS Over the next six years,RRFAwill need to replau its fleet The inventory of apparatus in Sectio apparatus in the current fleet.Exhibit 4-1 sum total costs through the year 2031,It also include needed to serve new growth.7 .IHLY I‘ICCUD,LULU‘LUJJ. d5 for the period of 2026-2031 a 17 apparatus and add 2 additional apparatus to n 2.2 provides the year of replacement for all ’narizes scheduled apparatus replacements and s the cost of expansions to the RRFA vehicle fleet Exhibit 4-1.Capital Costs for Apparatus,2026-2I mmu?v. CostProjectDescriptionQuantity Apparatus Replacements 5 $1 905 06 6 Ladder 1 7 $3,092 ,892AldUnit0$0 {‘nmmznd ¢1AR717 Dive Apparatus Service Vehicle 1 $126, Staff Vehicle 3 $52,034 331 Total Cast in Percentage Eligible CostsVearofRelatedtoCityof Replacement Renlon Growth $9,525,328 0% Utility Vehicle Sm.Utility Vehicle Apparatus/Equipment Lagggr 1 $425,918 Apparatus Total 7 See the RRFA Raxe Study for ere ImpacK Fees (2025)fonhe mexhodolc based on popula?an. Capital Facilities Plan 7 August 2025 £2,205,063, $2,576,87 1 .gy used to determine the proportion of growth—related apparatus needs 22 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) RRFA has three categories of station facility costs construction,and renovations to address operat summarized in Exhibit 4-2 and described in mort Exhibit 4-2.Capital Facility Costs for Stations,2( Project Description T: "debt servicing for existing stations,new station ional needs.The costs related to these needs are a detail below. )26-203 1 Percentage )tal Cost Rela‘ed to City of Renton Growth Impact Fee Eligible Casts .—.—.—4—...1 —..\.—Hre >tat|on lb §1L Future Fleet Maintenance Shop $7 _ Fire Station Improvements for Operational Needs Fire Station 11 Facility Improvements Fire Station 12 Facility Impmvements $ Fire Station 13 Facility Improvements $1 . Fire Station 13 Shop Facility Improvements Fire Station14Facility Improvements Fire Station 14 Tower Facility Improvements Fire Station 15 Facility Improvements Fire Station 16 Facility Improvements .uyuuuuvn +1 IMUIIII.’Viv n... Lana/:14 11%>1,/yb,wu 245,365 23%$1,644,698 520,962 0% $0 0% mm:rue amuun LU>l> 4.2.1 Debt Servicing 9;: RRFA intends to relocate Fire Station 16 and 5 within the City limits to support anticipated gro developed:however,provided exclusive of land acquisition,design,and other has no debt but does intend to issue Limited Ta) finnnrinp approximately$33MThe RRFA received a AA+ in Exhibit 4-2 represents anticipated bond paymi {akin Capital Facilities Plan 7 August 2025 .,ooL,‘u.L pa?‘iu?oo onstruct a new maintenance and repair facility wth in the area.Construction costs have not yet apnroximatelv $32M proiect. pre-construction expenses‘The RRFA currently (General Obligation (LTGO)bonds in September 'ating from 5&P in July of 2025.The debt service ants for the years 2026-2031 See Appendix A for 23 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) 4.2.2 New Facility Needs RRFA has identified the need to replace Fire Sta northeast side of Renton‘The existing facility w and does not accommodate the modern need: increase capacity to serve expected growth i naddition,the RRFAintends to build a new maint conduct apparatus service and repair as we coni Construction of the new Fire Station 16 and mai The total estimated cost of station and main design,and other pre-construction expenses is tion 16 in the East Plateau neighborhood on the as built in 1974 and is approaching 50 years old s of the fire service.Building a new station will this area of Renton for the next 50 years.In enance facility to provide the space necessaryto ue to expand ourfleet. ntenance facility is anticipated to begin in 2025. tenance facility construction,land acquisition, Ipproximately $40,000,000 The portion of project costs attributed to City 3 corresponds to the increase in bed capacity fr c§L...upeuuuuuau Lupauly.rul me maumeummc mun on a weighted analysis of the fleet’s service derr The facility is specifically designed to support h engines and ladder trucks,which require adva bays,reinforced vehicle lifts,and high-capacit weight.weights cost share takes into account the disproportion compared to engines.The following assum; w infrastructure demands. The current fleet includes 12 engines (12 un maintenance units.With the addition of one ne rowth for the new Fire Station 16 is 17%,which 1m six to seven,representing a 17%increase in t”many”: Ly,LJ/o u:m:Lubl I:alluLalcu w 5“.)qu uu>=u lands. zavy-duty emergency response vehicles,such as nced infrastructure including oversized service y tooling systems to accommodate their size, growth-related ate maintenance requirements of ladder trucks )tions were applied:one engine equals one mmnlayim its)and 2 ladder trucks (5 units),totaling 17 rW ladder truck and the retention of the current ladder truck as a reserve,the maintenance load of 22 maintenance units.The growth-related formula: Future Load 7 Current Growth Allocation::— Futu re Load Capital Facilities Plan 7 August 2025 will increase by 5 units,resulting in a future total share of this increase is calculated using the 22-17 23% 22 24 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Exhibit 4-3.Fire Sta?on 16 FIRESTATION16 4.2.3 Capital Projects Associated with Station Operational Needs The RRFA anticipates several improvement proji operational needs and maintain concurrency of 1 ”mum:map.Icyull mm .mmmmuuun mm uvl They are summarized in Exhibit 4-2 above and d Q DRODOQFD lnr‘ATlnNQCAPITALFACILITI Q “4.;”wrung“... The RRFA has identified the need to add one a iwithintheCity.Appendix C highlights the area Station 11,much of which inc|udes new develo covered by adding an additional ladder and Ioca Station 13. acts at existing fire stations necessary to address Fireservices through 2031.These improvements w.mum‘s Icsulul vycluuvvla mm .. etailed in Appendix B‘ ”ADAFITIFQ I‘VIIII—u VI I—I‘I 1 ‘I-II—I-I VII III—II d unit and one ladder to serve the new growth 5 covered by the addition of an aid unit at Fire pment parcels.Appendix D highlights the areas ting one ladder at Fire Station 12 and one at Fire 4.3.2 Station The new Fire Station 16 and maintenance facilit (fat-inn.uc emu-“r,.u:uhuuvll Lu m 1,1".mum:.ccu Due to the limited size of the current lot,the me will not accommodate a station intended to se ungevuy Ul a me >ldLIUI.m duuluull,Ln:LUHEI is at maximum capacity and cannot accommodz additional maintenance facility is needed.The bl-parcel or lam:and that wm allow up to £3,1L approximately 15,150 square feet will accomm( maintenance facility are planned for the new p2 the parcel. Capital Facilities Plan 7 August 2025 y will be located at 15815 SE 128mSt in Renton. 3 gm:(Fy.,mm m alxuutcu m.u Jv,uv\l .n yulucl u.«mu. Iximum building area allowed is 12,800 SF which we growth over the next 50 years,the average vu delILendnLe mumy IuLaLeu at rue alauull 13 me servicing any additions to the RRFA fleet.An 1ew Fire Station 16 will be located on a 151,721 lU 5r 0T Dulldlng space.A Single-story station or Jdate seven beds and three bays,and a five-bay ircel.See Appendix E for a preliminary layout of 25 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) 5.0 Capital Facilities Reve 5.1 OVERVIEW {‘ED..m.mums..."Hwy...“H”.t.t..- by RCW 36.70A.070(3)(d).Revenue estimates,u used to represent realistic expectations for reve This revenue analysis provides an approximah sources.The numbers projected in this analysis sensitivities such as local,state,and federal p analysis may not align with RRFA’s annual budge 1ue Analysis u.y.v..u...5 mum"...m.....\_.um...”u.’.hdwwu sing assumptions based on historical trends,are nue that may be available for capital funding. 3,and not exact,projection of future revenue Ire for planning purposes and cannot account for olicy,economic trends,and other factors.This t because it is based on multi-year projections of revenue,while the annual budget presents pre: in a specific fiscal year. 5.2 FUNDINGTHE CAPITALFACILI T Estimated future revenues are projected for w “45V.Inn.“«WV.y....5 w. -Dedicated Capital Revenues. certain types of capital spend revenues TDI’nnrH II'ICHJCIE nre Operating Transfers.Operating transferred in from the op sources (0 De reueu on TOI'capl' operating transfers-in to its res are not specifically dedicated t < Lluu Bonus.Hnanclng bonds Ipwina ray ('0 :ise estimates of available revenue for spending IES PLAN the years 2025-2031.The revenue analysis is )edicated revenues are required to be used for ing,outlined by the law.The dedicated capital A“...L..LL_Impact tees remlueu (u nm-A my me thy. ;transfers-in are those revenue sources that are ating fund.Although these are not dedicated [3|Iunulng,me KKI’A endeavors [O maKe regular erves on a level basis each year.These transfers )capital spending and could be used elsewhere, that do not requlre Voter approval or Inctuae tne Other Funding Sources.The available to fund capital projec 5.3 ASSUMPTIONS The RRFA revenue analysis is based on the follov Analysis Boundary.The analysi in Exhibit 1-1. Growth targets were as of August 2025, Property Tax.This analysis assl an annual rate of 1%going construction growing accordir Capita|Facilities Plan 7 August 2025 -r.._,.. RRFA continuously explores external sources ts such as grant opportunities. ving assumptions: 5 includes the current RRFA boundary as shown )rovided the staff and reflect proiections Jmes that property tax revenues will increase at forward,with the assessed value and new \g to the July 2025 King County Economic and 26 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Revenue Forecast —Office of E c nu:DEIIEIII.“muse.m LVLL,u benefit charge with a vote of n efirebenefitchargemaybeusec the fire benefit makes up Fire Impact Fees.This analysis fees proposed by the RRFA and the interlocal residential and commercial im nonresidential growth projecti: increase at an annual growth r onomic and Financial Analysis. ”.4", IE vum;appluvcu a Lull'ycal .eucwm u.m:me early 82%in favor ofthe proposition.By law,the lfor up to 60%of the RRFA operating budget.In rapproximatelv 19%of the RRFA‘s total budget. assumes the City will adopt the 2026 fire impact will remit fees collected to the RRFA as outlined between the and the pact fee revenues are based on residential and ms provided by City staff‘ has ate of 3%. Fermi“and Fees.This analysis and fees will increase slightly 0 Sprvirsm..,_... at a rate of 3%per year and revenues will remain level.G Igovernmentandtheprogram ( 5.4 FIREIMPACT FEES 201] paid in full using impact fees collected by the RRFA on a monthly basis.Impact fees collected t (‘FD fac ty needs identified in this CFP.The RRFA prc 2026 through 2031.Exhibit 5-1 compares the pl ”M”«5SIUVVLIICIGLCUPIUJCDLDUDL),a)PICDCIILCU LAI ;assumes revenues from miscellaneous permits ver the current rates‘ <prvirn<im‘rpaq: Ground Emergency Medical Transport (GEMT) EMT funding is at the discretion of the federal :ould be modified or cancelled at any time‘ ity.The City now remits fire impact fees to the hrough 2025 will be used for capital facility needs ujects fire impact fees of $5,718,210 for the years 'ojected fire impact fee revenue to the projected A,1 Evkik?[L1 l.hI’L- Capital Facilities Plan 7 August 2025 27 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Exhibit 5-1.Projected Dedicated Capital RevenL Dedicated Revenues and Project Costs Fire Impact Fee Revenues (remitted) Planned Growth-Related Project Costs Estimated Dedicated Funding Surplus/(Deficit) 5.5 OPERATINGTRANSFERS The projected revenues available for operating tr is $51,200,000.RRFA‘s funding streams for tl [es and Costs 2026-1031 Total Revenues and Costs $5,713,210 ($299,650) ansfers-in over the planning period of 2026-2031 lese transfers-in and for capital facilities costs include revenues from its property tax,fire ben LTGO bonds,and miscellaneous permits and fee DIX-YtAK LUDI ANIJ KtVtNUt This six-year comparison looks at RRFA’stotal re‘ planning horizon of 2026-2031 order to Uncl capital costs and potential future revenues,Ca ;(VOE)and include growth-related capital facilit “"""'—"—“I“‘1"“"'—I"‘—'‘—"""“'""""‘ Exhibit 5-2.Estimated Capital Facilities Revenue Lapl‘al Keplacement ana PFOJECILOSIS,not UFO efit charge,transport and GEMT fees,EMS levy, s. LUIVI PAK IDUN venues and planned project costs forthe six-year rstand the difference between future dedicated 3ita|costs are presented as year of expenditure y and apparatus replacement costs.Exhibit 5-2 costs} -s and Costs VOE Revenues and Costs 2026-2031 wm-Kelateu )LO,“15,434 ? Impact Fee Revenue uyunuuns “mule:rulcnum neveuu: 5.7 POLICYOPTIONSANDOTHER F One additional potential funding source option i s 'Unlimited Tax General Ubligatl voter approval and inciude the 8 source:Ramon RFA,1025 Capital Facilities Plan 7 August 2025 $5,718,210 (:1 gJL,Luu,uvu 'UNDING SOURCES Ion (UTGU)Bonds:i-Inanclng bonds that require levying of an additional tax to repay them. 28 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Estimated Debt Servicing Amortization 6 Months Amount:$33,150,000 Vear Interest Principal 1.Year NJ.)5]/,U[:1.J./)1,325U,UUU.' Schedule Term:20 Years Interest Rate:5.0% Debt Service Year W $2,357,029.17 4w; VaarN/I 7|:nn.ma.w-v “mun“.w “,“JNW. 5 Vear?S $1 395 500 00 $1,000 6.Year #6 $1,336,500.00 $1240 000. 7.Year #7 $1,274,500.00 $1,300,000. s.Vear #8 $1,209,500.00 $1,365,000. 9.Year #9 $1 141 250.00 $1,435,000. 10.Vear #10 $1,069,500.00 $1, 11.Year #11 $994,250.00 $1,580,000. 12.Vear #12 $915 250.00 15.Year #15 >85£,ZDU.UU >1,/4b,UUU. ”0 $2,575,250.00 2027 W )4:lb,l:>U.UU Ausu 0°2030 $2,574,500.00 2031 2032 “0 $2,574,250.00 2035 00 “U $2,577,250.00 405/ 14.Year #14 $745,000.00 $1,830,000. 15.Vear #15 $653,500.00 $1,920,000 . (Anm.may "m 9.).)I ,Juu.uu JL,uLu,Uuu. 17.Vear #17 $456,500.00 $2,120,000 . 18.Vear #18 $350,500.00 $2,225,000 19.Year #19 $239,250.00 $2,335,000. 20‘Vear #20 $122,500.00 $2,450,000. Capital Facilities Plan $2,575,000.00 W §Z,b//,5(X).UO AH" 00 $2,576,50000 00 00 $2,574,250.00 2043 00 $2,572,500.00 2044 29 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Appendix B:Major Repair an Station/Description 2026 2017 Fire Stat n #11 $25,095 5186,49 Water heater $26,095 , Exhaust Fan,Furnace 5186, 49.“'Fiaon‘ngmeigFinIsh‘e‘s,‘"" ExpansionTank,Fainting Hrs 52::mm 53mm $117. 14: Air handler unit,pump $304,134 , Automatic Transfer Switch,Boiler, -$117, d Rehabilitation for Stations 2028 2029 2030 2031 $0 $103,063 so so ~NWNBG - rurnlture/IVIIIIWOrK Pump,water heater,Painting '' Fire Smlon ~13 50 $423. 40 Storage Tank and Painting '' AC Unit,Condensing Unit, Evaporative Unit,Fire Alarm *Hts/ml Systems,Lighting,Roofing ,, Air Compressor, Carpet,Auto 7....,;,.., Water Heater, Package Unit ,_, Fire Sutian "M $0 5119,41 Electrical panel, pgmnng '$129, 415 Dams/hardware, Flooring,Pump, _¢71 _¢ERR VHF,“,...w,wu $123,889 ——— $67,011 —$643 :xpanslon Ianx AC Unit,Water Heater Exhaust Fan,Unit Heate Generator > Painting - ‘ Water Heater , Grand Total $379,541 5556,45 Capital Facilities Plan _.511,014 $16,659 -$13,658 -- ,$1,059 ,, 5 $157,337 $214,151 $15,501 $631,122 30 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Appendix C:Fire Station 11 Drive Time (Aid Unit) RRFABoundary El rnmmarirallh/lr||H_E2mHu ,.um.” “\v Newcastle _:1 ,,_Q mmsunm-New Demcpmemhmels' 1 ‘Name-am 11 n.1,; w mam wam u wuw‘ 7 , \) on 17 Plnamsxy Capital Facilities Plan [?pm \Echo oumam 2 m La»:Lake Desm;Pavk 1.‘1 Shadaw LakeMap-Bale:Open "eelMapw mm Facebaok m.m ‘Emma:Esn CummumwMaps znmnbutms Map VayaPWq J 31 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Appendix D:Fire Station “\x // 2-13 Drive Time (Ladders) RRFABoundary El rammmzmllnm.IH_:;mHu-.M",m...w...” Q mm Sulwns-New Dev?cpmem Panels Name Par -RRFAII 10-75-”mamas w“ Peak i V. A] Capital Facilities Plan Ecm wnlam 2 m ng takclake am ‘I c .-‘I Shadow um Map-dam a OpenSIrealMapw Mosul!Farabauk m.m»; ‘Emma:Esn CummumwMap:znmnbutmg Map vaymwg 32 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) Appendix E:Fire Station 16/laintenance Building Preliminary Design (D Emma mm mmummm : ._=a... r;Fm:sumo»nsnsozcnvs vtw mu nomwssv Capital Facilities Plan Inl.m1: G an:sum"nchmE new mu mum 33 AGENDA ITEM #2. d) II- ‘n 2” ®numemwct nuluuouin msvliwrnou mums! ' Capital Facilities Plan 34 AGENDA ITEM #2. d)