The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA90-049 r . '. -.4zr • 1 - • .__ _ .... .16 alai .4... 1 . / di Z i iI /, At ee.112m•,-..a3PG0/-FIZ*1-fr- eLeia. i 0 / / .... _ - WkiNtA20_ la. glEtca eLEVATot--1 . ..... .... .,.. 14 .1.111-1";6' 151-41X--1' 1 1 4. I 0 11 S?) 5 ,F. 1"----- d ,. v6 I •.• . 'SO 1 1 - Per,e- --ifiP ACIT-4\iNTIE 70 APP.*. ..CF ' St6s. ,041-9 0 1 --- ----- 4 - - -. - •••••••••••• ommimi i••••••. ... .mom.••mino. .. . ....., ... / e . I 1 • / f • / ii - i__.-- .. I 4 itrft.0 - /I ---. /.. I 1 i I. i '1/4. 5 1 4 Z. 1 i i 1 CRY OF RENTON 1 ma -.1 111111r ....e.. . i • I,1 if V 41.... R E c E V E ...... (.4 ' Aaw ---rAus 2 • 8 1990 lima "ft'................a.+. i • _...1 .......A..."4- -.d.16. BUILDING DIVISION •,__-24--- • . ..,......” I•g 0 IJ_TA-a-r3 .-1-ca'gra CET 9 - . '®m4,1-1...1 _1_1 . . H mszt-as4aor *R ——7 MI . IiiIILLU t'-':'h z.:, •or•: '''° - 1pe \ v ,. \\,\ / ,101.L... 9so21=e GrW11-0.13-.0.2 .n ./''''''''' 'P - ' \''\ \ N 5 • *Mt....04,031 , .1„...6.. ,t '' t..eN\ .‘.#4'''' • . --- -1,..,4,,,., . , > •P'pl — • ,.1.4.91,VAII-L54-"1 i37)7- IP \g-. 1111 c 4414.\\ • 5 . I'll I il I . :4:' ,• ,, . G &5 Tt''''.., ,..• .•' . \\ \ ,, : , _,,-- .. .. N..1 ";.''-- 5- I'72:1'..L84'ise.-re -1- .3r1- c.,-'` ' - N - - A ''','' ‘ X!-....,-.IL to-4.•...L ..-.-,,,,,II..`•— 1--- --1/i.e,,ce,-,•%P.S,g/. P it.4 kiv:10\ -; -'';''-_,,- ;-,,,:a•bz ‘, 6. •-, — 3 • 1-_ \ ) ------•,0,.)1 0.,1 sanis-T¢_- :S. gISP11110 0 • - :\ ' \ - \ 1 • 1 1 , C .. .....---- • --- --- -'•. s 11.CriM1,40....1 T. I. 4,,,., ,Ilt! ------- . .‘,.. . , , ,..,... .J ,... wiLd .. , , ,,, , e ® 1 :9 mot9n.32r.. • Z . N 114 N.5.f.ia H.L.rc,S , P • 1 , , I i I§) 1•''' I•', ' \111, , - . it 1, I ' ,..: ,1 -,-,', L I NI • 1.11111111111111 :::• ;i1.,1. • _auti.10,Ja ::.;: 'I/ ' 11 -'' MN,,'IMI :1;'..•' ,,,c-) Iggimmummosimmommommumiliiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiism mom immommommilliliiiiiiiii0 . II , ••••:,,f-.:.. ..r, 1,, ,-..i55,Z , * •, 1 1 i ' - • 'Srli VerJ,,84 ' ,. .,.. ,„....... . ., . 0 ;I .! .-.0'' . • A.-‘101 8 9 4. I ii I. •:;, • II. , I I . I n ! 11 : _ • i 6 1 _.,),...,,,-.141:144.T.T1 . 0 I 0 . G ;•..,.-4 -,17,1 1 I. CID . 1 G 0 . . I .. • SANDRA CARTER 13603 S.E. 107TH PL RENTON WA 98055 FLOYD F FIGGINS 4225 NE 19TH ST RENTON WA 98056 SUNSET HIGHWAY SELF STORAGE ASSOCIATES 2000 - 124TH AVE N ;E. SUITE B-100 BELLEVUE WA 98005 CITY OF RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 ei6(1k- f l� . F7Ezrcet,Az 4242-PTV 4 /yam 5" 8'/x" 42" 21" 42" 25" o O 8%x" VAULT . No.4242-PTV .a;:''"9 33'/z" 33'h". °;e 1920Ibs. 30 .•' ,..,.., jii A. 3-%"Dia.Lifting Inserts b'7 ��7 26%z" : ; a9 o-.d .: ...: ,. igoi goo,.,,/2 Ilk 24" � 6" 18'h'. 48" 48" 1 For details see reverse side. Copyright 1980 6 I , i r O O. O - O - 0 - 0 N • - 0 G I - • - 0 ' N ' c - 0 1111 • 0 k:- - - 0 0 G U+-z • 5 PLAN le.,-NTON I-aTAIL i5UILGINGI NED NELSON.ARCHITECT N.xeeimun D 1 / ��N�R RWNTON Wp N NeA via • . • . • . • ,., „ _ n G,i LANDSCAPE NOTES, ,, i , l n• aY�cEo,1.a _ ��/J� Ilyn oaMEH ay. 0,f0 16ub=redo.inclu6� ran w to 1/1M t paned M h /UrtC THpcv� /��il,l'iL` F ama•al e mW. m inlet: Imwota Ey I- LLOM v M3E l/ +1 ape arp�dteec or emr'.npxmmaLa[Sve far landowwy / I 4 installation. - I Ill F w 2 Landscape contractor shall malty sub gra.. . s //. 1 le d pN topsoil in all planting area,pacific Topsoil 5-way mix • $flf/pELY GI.rvCAt //, /U E IfC U//FE �g 4.Pr approved.dual. /N/O,r,ve sz s N / s ` vrtNM4wrp c[.f^ _"•e s depth mulct in an planting l.a.. bat,. -/�/��%/// I�\y IJ el; 6A11 plant material Wall be lama landscape architect or iTte.OSLMrOMO .reap ow/do 'I�I,a� I. 0.,5/N p'fopp Dr.°ant ..a before installation. e¢eKN eWceO • GAMIN Iy,Nrovccn. N/IIf MULLII <o8d m 6 All utplanting.shall have triangular spacing. %�' _ 5 T All elan material Wall conform • for nursery '11 9 dw2 X.•.CES •w i. .latest edition. sage,WVep 111. um6 M/r4//✓S �y( �y,�rl� ypeep^r ex... Z w^ a plant materiel o as Rind not available my M substituted • MEtN t.Snm Mt4Ce4 -- r ^/ CE. \It l /P IFiM1Ke. O C•38•• with approval of landscape architect. -- .. r IIn�. I nK.NJX d Y colt-KTeD/y v.aza& g arc r pots shall Inspected for proper dtolmga by landscape ul sub-< architect o saner• pLe.maintain. - - TCO T'[.'M 6 ''. NO pY\&,r rove. Id Positive as. Maximum mumll op maintained. Y planting.wean ,0n0 eIHA'I'c1 < ...� I et- em anti. A: Ti16 (/.KnG rWK6 z minimum lisp es elope]..uNmas otherwisecar tap RMmNO rT rWKO ,.- :-. eel fpLe et-/'wr?e.AA4. :. -.:�I,F .�i fV2e Lit ptprB+Lt Z 11 eels and alma•g•fa turn for mar overhang.unless . sync Kar eA[L J:'.�_ ,f l tope not.. u d•mCI 1d..u1W mowing.tall meant la 1a until fi m Calla EVERGREEN IA *',wand rwewpw,oaetetr.all maintain.14 until final lama. SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL TREE PLANTING DETAIL TREE PLANTING DETAIL z by owner. ItN'CIOHt: y p • �L^'% aNYORN'R `` _ 14t Od -- H6B•49'2P'Ll �' .��/' • v-, 0 RETAIL 6UILgHG \ — MGR'S Vs - Z}- gY 'U •II / X _\ _ f''' }1 A. 1. per . \ \ V. 'g N, a I'IAIHT LIST "`-' 40. h'.i.Ar/s err e,on.rie+.-/GonrM1 H H.r1c Al --/ lh y • �' 9 AGC.L R4bmtk-1/K.� rteeLer PVC,- ad. 0,01_O1I o.O. / 4 9 rt•12•2 ccw.stlt[tA.THdHt.Rz+cJO/H.OI.ERIH4 Pllrri I%.ica.L. e.HG �•- 4 N{4O niHTo0.TA/2Hca-e flHt H I'Ivi 6l6 p7C e GYT1em19 r-Adel.1HOLLAHOIAI/ PIHii bVoeH 1 GALLON 10 14 AL,. odc1HAT4P1/Jige-run U'rim-i. .14P11 / J ' r�®`ek 44 pHorria rmauen-I 24i1 ' P=I - Hpme.aa. H&Llx/2-fYLIe4 IVY 4 Pc,24'O.C.. H J06I9o-125N 1 - 1 *covf-G 'A1-'H LAHDA.PE PLAN 1.1 c .e...� 23 "Nab,0 ruW.n10ALIs/PYFAHICAL AF-ec+mtrit.4'rH.a 4'-o'Oc. 5'-2d-d p M • \ • .r \ ._,/- . Pp.l \ / �:' I \ s� I' /' • \ ////////////////////////// /////2////•'%/// ///// $ Ely... of Tee- $ \ / x- MI•61.1-pti. d d 8�`N • BLDG-A I / l / m I 2.' num. j .7".Z...___Nlofi7XY :,-/1('r 4.,(21X!///10/ / /.,/_/,.._ c,,,,,,,..---Z//..... .,:<, . ,Y 0.1.:. '. 7'',,. ' .., ,,,..,./7 \ UNIT% II \ / \\ '//'///% /m �/// /s �/ I� COVE man s I I 1 ///l//,�,/_////'/' /////////////'* 's° 1 ' 400.43SCALE:1'..20' a • : .w.. i' /{// .,alai "�� ; mo.+,B,TI ea ' 1 •• /a /%/ , / E.ib 22 IM',HJ•r1J Ten _ � n�,of LEGAL DESCRIPTION .Qom e`°s •' Lot 2 0l Renton Short ant No.052-BB b / 0.� / • (submitted for approval 2/1E/g0).a o.S • o 6 �o.w portion of Tract 10 of Jonepb,NoreNaR - f / OF 1 v / j / 1� Tract;as per aai>page J0.Rewde • Fro ( G o .'Y m // of King CauntY.IYin9 N Ne SW 1/4 h / a tYd' �' tulle �/ j% of Ne SW 1/4 of SaUm J.T2g.R5E. / ^ ® / / W.N..Litt of Renton. ' � \••.. \ Are /1 .// V/ moo e/ BENCH MARK i, ' ® G G 2' A _ - •, /• ! . 'P'In Power Vault mini m.comer of Building'o' ` I G G � ?411, j 4T E/ of SpNng4ea Condominium. Elev.612.47. 10'SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT /' , N { i \`• City of Renton Datum. AUDITOR'S FILE NO.620)240 " NSt /G'�/,G ©� /� WOM/ �\P • , , TYJP s+.H me.�Eza t I G G �/ v�f/// /'�j /orvnw /�' V ,xTTrna tat=..r��.�T.o >i' N lip' re '.. ...o,,,„,. S•ra a.rh.le I \ .14¢•6G-rb MI•rL t Y < ,M $ T.A. / 9TA 6.T9.19 BITE - .21E / Tv .P0.4a u'l,LNC VICINITY MAP "��.os su reT eo. N.TS U/ N4ROVAl PREPARED BY OWNER SRER Baima & Holmberg Inc. 5b pewHRIS LEAD W meal BARE :•� — 1 • ENGINEERS . SURVEYORS 0s-05-90 _ tom Dun amo RENTON RETAIL BUILDINGOF A]B Na GEMQEDCBY asuil m a. DRAWN BY•n ns�cro„CHEMED BY as-0m REV. BY CHECKED DARE MEN su °' `"°''�, PRELJMINARY DRAINAGE PLAN •s ' i D . NED NELSON NED NELSON • ARCHITECT THREE LAKE BELLEVUE DRIVE,SUITE 200 ____Lecytai '• BELLEVUE,WASHINGTON 98005 ' ____ . (206) 455 4900 -k • • j :• w �i a. �: . t . ________ ' T � tif , ...... .........„...............„....................7 • - . . VI> . 1.. .._ r.._....-__..__- ---'--i / / . .. . .ter-i- -- — - - �- 1 - .!_ ._f.__�_ r! .-- r../J.—,i�3'`�•Y�/�—' r �-----______- i lq7 or - { E r •11 C. I 3 t I C G . . /111111: /D 1 l , eill . , filw . ._ . _ . .. I 1*.n . HLJ1LH EfC E V E IL160( itrvi I� • i (-A oi Ali 2 8 1990 .rR BUILDIN DIVISI °(.N 4242-PTV A'— I I-3/I6"X2"X3" BRASS OR BRONZE PLATE (IMBEDDED) i 1-- -�=I I=�- -I =N ' CO ---2I"X 25"OPENING - -il - �- - I ® a o 11 -_ -3-5/8"DIA. PLASTIC � 25�� - - LIFTING INSERTS - I co cr ' ' 1 - 0) I I a ° I L - - ---- _I . 24" _I 24" .... 48" Al -- I 42" 42" 8/2" 25" 81/2" 1 16" 21" 5" f' f 331/2" 1 1 - 33 1/2" r- f-\., ' I 4 7"X 7" OPENINGS I = . 2-LIFT HOLES = 11 M I 1/2" DIA. 01 I co . ,,: ) +• ,\.. 1 , - . v air VP ..1SECTION AA li 710111 i - i 61113111° . . - SCALE: " _ - „,... t.: , ;1 6.1 -.cu lest ON 4 MMus® , ;« III II #., .414hh,. • .. Mik .______,..• •— ::,- , . . i , •.•-•" _ t 1 a - I III . I r (1 lil r I __________: ---- --- • . . - . I . A - -.••• 1111 Ell • _____--__j_.11..........mmonemorr.......r................------ - -------- ,-;-,---••••••••••••..- MIIIMINOMMONN., '..-..7.-•:•-.. _.... ...... ........".""..'... ... -.....- ••.-• -...s...........""..'"."""."."... , , .--••-..........A.b.../.._.4 #al.'__,... ... " , —..••••-if — -i 00.°°'11111111‘iii I . 1 • IN .t1 I. i ii O M MIMI 1 - -a - , NEN i li'i I U'I\\\ \\\\\\'\\\\\\ \\\\ IIIII'�I�iill ' - . / Ili4 ' .40 i 4 belga `22 - .....rk ---..z - - -.• -. 11 iim Imminui.„'-MI Mums .....- —- ---------__ _ . . . . - . . 1 . , ., CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department l ` 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 P /-tOtO 6 :4)..„ CITY IF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann,Administrator October 13, 1991 Craig Johnson 16327 Maplewild Avenue SW PO Box 66285 Seattle,WA 98166 SUBJECT: Leady Retail Building, 4454 Sunset Blvd NE SA-049-90 Dear Mr. Johnson: At your request, we have reviewed the proposed revised site plan (dated September 11, 1991) for the above-referenced project. As you are aware, the City previously approved a site plan design with the mansard roof and related architectural features to be extended to include all building perimeters. This plan was approved in order to ensure that mitigation would be achieved for on-site and off-site aesthetic impacts (particularly as these impacts would affect abutting approved residential development to the northwest and potential future commercial development to the west). This approved roofing plan is consistent with criteria listed in the Site Plan Review Ordinance, which mandates that we address both on-site and vicinity impacts both over the life of the project. Requirements for this development are also consistent with requirements for other area developments --for example,the Leady Public Storage facility which was approved with gable/hip roofing to address visual impacts from neighboring properties and public streets. Following a review of the now proposed modifications of the roofing treatment, based upon the above- described criteria, staff has concluded that the removal of the mansard roofing treatment (and related architectural features approved during Site Plan Review would not be consistent with the subject development or recently approved developments nearby. Neither would such modifications comply with City development standards. Therefore, staff and I conclude that the initial site plan conditions should be retained without modification. Since this is an administrative decision, it may be appealed, pursuant to Section 4-8-11(A)(3), to the Hearing Examiner within fourteen (14) days of the date of this decision by filing an appeal with the Office of the Hearing Examiner and paying a$75.00 appeal fee. If you have questions or would like additional information, please feel free to contact me or Lenora Blauman, project planner, at 235-2550. el , Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator cc: Lach Foss, Architect 3 Lk Bellevue Dr, #200 Bellevue, WA 98005 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 -'OCT-01-199i 18:14 FROM CRAIG M JOHNSON TO 2352513 P.01 C :AIG M. JOHNSON x6 27 MAPI.EWILD AVICNVE r3OUTHWF.aT 7P0$T OFPICIC$ ox 6452go tMATTLE.WAAMNOTON 9AIOB PANNING DIVISION soe a�araGa44 CITY OF RENTON PAX 204.gx52 OCT - 3 19Jq 1 October 1 , 1991 RECEIVED Lenora Blauman, Project Manager Department of Planning/Building/Public Works b:L ty of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South it,'',, enton, WA 9b055 VIA FACSIMILE RE: J 1i Building Dear Lenora: Thank you for meeting with my architect, Lachlan Foss and me on Friday, September 20th, to discuss our request to modify the roof/ parapet treatment of our proposed retail building. Lach left for your review drawing of the requested revisions and photographs of an identic i building in Kent. We reasonably believe that the revisions are asthetically pleasing . and are consistent and continuous around the building. We respect- fully request your review and approval of the revisions or in the alternative, specific written guidance as to what would be accepted if our request does not meet your approval . Please call me if you have any questions . Sincerely, g . Johnson Project Owner cc: Lachlan Foss OCT-07-1991 16:51 FROM CRAIG M JOHNSON TO 2352513 P.01 JOHNSON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES maNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON OCT — 8 1991 `. POST OFFICE BOX 66285 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98166 RECEIVED TELEPHONE: 2.06-244-3535 24 HOUR FAX: 206-244-91i2 DATE; 10/1 TO I% J, LPJ F'" EPAC N v. FROI TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES, INCLUDING THIS FAX COVER SHEET: COMMENTS/INSTRUCTIONS: 4Nc P Me44 CAN PA:DO . __ UI.I-0(-1=1 10•aeJ 11N,, .,,., .. .. .__. . 4. CRA,IG M. JOHNSON 10247 4APLEWTLD AVENUE STOUT iWEST PORT OFFICE BOX 004135 AfCATTLE.WASitt2KOTOjr 9810C. PLANNING DIVISION 200-444.3535 CITY OF RENTON FAY 40C•32444ut.4 OCT - 81991 October 7, 1991 RECEIVED Do:, .. ld K. Erickson Del:Ir.tment of Planning City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 93055 VIA FACSIMII:c RE: � ail Bu; . , lns • rson : = : ; day, SF ptembez ,i , . a .�; � I met .nnora I 1 auman * - _ . ng ng. ns, Id 1 4: .xma`�: CIT OF RENTON ' Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann, Administrator December 19, 1990 Craig M. Johnson 16327 Maplewood Ave SW P.O. Box 66285 Seattle, WA 98166 SUBJECT: Leady Retail Building Landscape Plan SA-049-90 Dear Mr. Johnson: To confirm our discussion over the telephone on December 13, 1990, the approved landscape plans for the Leady retail building can be modified to provide 100% sod, as a ground cover, in the 10' wide area along Sunset Blvd, between the property line and the south edge of the parking lot. The trees will still be required in this area as indicated on the approved landscape plans. All ground cover, shrubs and trees on the remainder of the project site shall be provided as indicated on the approved landscape plans. The colored portion of the attached plan accurately reflects the area in which the ground cover may be modified. If you have any further questions regarding this matter, please contact me at 235-2550. Sincerely, ,/f Mark R. P , ICP Senior Planner Leady2 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 `' . ,� CITN -OF R,ENTON Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann, Administrator December 12, 1990 Craig M. Johnson 16327 Maplewood Ave SW P.O. Box 66285 Seattle,WA 98166 SUBJECT: Leady Retail Building SA-049-90 Dear Mr. Johnson: We have completed a review of the requested changes to the approved landscaping plans for the Leady retail building. We can not agree that 100% sod will give the property a higher quality look than the approved combination of shrubs and ivy ground cover. The shrubs are used to buffer the view of the parking lot from adjacent roadways and properties. As you will recall, the site plan approval process required additional landscaping in order to improve the visual appearance to this project. Condition#5 reads as follows: "That the applicant, in order to provide a more visually pleasing environment, shall provide a landscaping plan which includes increased number," size and diversity of plantings throughout the site, with particular attention to the western, northern and southern boundaries, the area abutting the structure, and parking area. The plan shall be approved by the Planning Division prior to site preparation/building permits." At this time, we do not believe that the requested plan, which would reduce the number and diversity of plant materials in the parking lot, can be approved. The landscaping should be installed in accordance with the approved landscape plan. If you have any further questions regarding this matter, please contact either Lenora Blauman or myself at 235-2550. Sincerely, WO/ Mark R. P , AICP Senior Planner Leadyllr 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 ►1EMORANDUM To Marilyn Peterson, City Clerk Date 11/19/90 From SagfOger, Developmeit Planning Subject Chris Ieady (ECF;SA-049-90) This project has been completed by Administrative Site Plan Review and is being sent to your offfde to be filed. CITY OF RENTON Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann, Administrator November 16, 1990 Ned Nelson, Architect 3 Lk Bellevue Dr, #200 Bellevue, WA 98005 SUBJECT: Leady Retail Building ECF;SA-049-90 Dear Mr. Nelson: This letter is to inform you that the appeal period has ended for the site plan review for the above- referenced project. No appeals were filed. This decision is final and application for building permits may proceed. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact Lenora Blauman or me, at 235-2550. cerely, ~it Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator cc: Chris Leady 2000- 124th Ave NE, #B100 Bellevue,WA 98005 final/DKE/kac 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 1 N.. P .........• dayof. .. .. ,ar-:..:.::::.:•.:::::..::......::..:.:.:::.:.:.::::.;:.::.: :'.::.:<;.:;:.:';>:;•:: :•:.;:.:.::•:•:::<.::.::;•:;•:.;:•:<. • On the 199Q I deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing A w tr t5 ilue„ Si-�-t 1 a.n }Reizo-r documents . This information was .sent to: Name Representing C I'111iS U9ta -k_ 14.e\SCA • • • • • • • (Signature of Sender) . • Subscribed and sworn to me this � day of OCR (9-ex- , 1990 . Notary• bli in c and for the . State Wa ington residing at �21,v.01 • therein. ) • :Prod ect Tzr ADMINISTRATIVE SITE PLAN REVIEW CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION OCTOBER 25, 1990 APPLICATION NO.: ECF; SA-049-90 APPLICANT: Chris Leady LOCATION: 4546 Sunset Blvd. N.E. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Applicant seeks site plan approval for revised plans (dated September/October 1990)for a 10,500 square foot retail center. The center will be subdivided to suit tenant requirements as space is leased. COMMITTEE REVIEW: Review was conducted after receiving written comment from all divisions of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department, and the Fire, Police,and Parks Departments. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing application, proof of posting and publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No. 2: Site plan (received October 12, 1990). Exhibit No.3: Landscape plan (received September 19, 1990). Exhibit No. 4: Building elevation plans (received October 12, 1990). FINDINGS,CONCLUSIONS,AND DECISION Having reviewed the written record in the matter,the City now makes and enters the following: Findings: 1. The applicant, Chris Leady, has requested site plan approval for a 10,500 square foot retail center. The center will be constructed as a single, one-story structure with an articulated facade, stucco siding and gabled metal roofing. The structure is to be located near the north boundary of the site, on an axis which parallels Sunset Boulevard, with a service area to the north of the building. Parking and landscaping abut Sunset Boulevard. An access is provided on the western property line to be used jointly with the Figgins/Bechtold property to the west of the site, to provide ingress/egress to Anacortes Avenue. 2. The applicant's file containing the application, the State Environmental Policy Act• (SEPA) documentation,the comments from various City departments,the public notices requesting citizen comment,and other pertinent documents was entered as Exhibit No. 1. 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43.21.C., 1971 as amended),a Determination of Non-Significance- Mitigated was issued for the subject proposal on June 27, 1990,with the following conditions: a. That the applicant, in order to mitigate transportation impacts, provide: a) a fair share contribution of $4426.00 toward the realignment and signalization of the Sunset Boulevard/Anacortes Avenue intersection; and b) restrict access to right in/right out only for the western most ingress/egress point for the subject site. (Note 1.a: The applicant may be called upon to participate in the development of a cross- easement providing entry access from the subject site to the immediately abutting property to the west and obtaining exit passage rights from the subject site via the Anacortes Avenue access on the immediately abutting property to the west. If such an easement is established, it is to be approved by the City Attorney and recorded prior to the issuance of site preparation/building permits.) b. That the applicant, in order to mitigate impacts to the City's sole source aquifer, provide an agreement, in conjunction with site plan review, to submit to the City for approval of proposed specific uses, in order that the City may ascertain that such uses are suitable, or can be Improved to be suitable, for development in Zone 2 of the APA. Uses and improvements are to be approved by the Planning Division, the Public Works Department and the Fire Prevention Bureau. The agreement is to be valid for the life of the project,and is to be approved by the City Attorney in advance of the issuance of site preparation/building permits. Administrative Site Plan Review Report and Decision October 25, 1990 Page 2 c. That the applicant provide a construction mitigation plan including the following components: 1) an erosion control element; 2) an element for wheel-washing of all construction vehicles prior to leaving the site; 3) an element for watering down the site periodically to control dust and debris; 4) an element for restriction of hauling routes and hours of hauling operations; and e) an element for signage of site and structures during construction to facilitate emergency service provision. These elements/plans are to be approved by the City prior to issuance of site preparation/building permits. (Note 1.c.: The applicant shall ensure that the construction mitigation plan is made a part of the contractor's agreements.) In addition, staff recommend: d. That the applicant, in order to mitigate recreation impacts, be encouraged to make a voluntary contribution toward the development of public recreation facilities in the area which may be utilized by the center's employees and/or consumers. (NOTE #1: At the time of site plan review and/or building permit review, staff will recommend conditions including, but not limited to: 1) extension of roof treatment to the east and west sides of the structure; 2) redesign of the parking area to reduce 53 provided spaces to 44 required spaces, including the elimination of the four parallel parking spaces, in order to ensure safe, effective circulation; 3) introduction of additional landscaping to provide a more visually pleasing environment; 4) development of an on-site exterior lighting plan to illuminate the site; 5) development of a thematically integrated signage plan; 6) development of storm drainage management systems; and 7) development of utility service systems. • (NOTE #2: At the time of building standard off-site improvements will be required for this development.) 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all City departments affected by the impact of this proposal. 5. The site plan as presented, provides sufficient parking to comply with the Parking and Loading Ordinance of the City of Renton. 6. The subject site was annexed into the City in 1974 by the Adoption of Ordinance No. 2894. The site was zoned B-1, Business District on September 23, 1985 by Ordinance No.3943. 7. Land use surrounding the subject site is commercial uses and multi-family residential uses. 8. The applicant's revised site plan complies with the requirements for information for site plan review. Review of the application was conducted based upon Section 4-31-33 (D,1) of the Zoning Ordinance (Site Plan Review)together with all other relevant information, as follows: a. Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan, its elements and policies; The proposed development is permitted for this property under the Commercial designation on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. Similarly,the development conforms with Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies. For example, the proposed development is consistent with Urban Design Goals calling for development to be allowed only where it can be shown to be compatible with future uses in the vicinity (III.A.1). The property is surrounded to the east, west and south by parcels zoned for commercial use; those parcels are now developed or planned for development in the near future. It is bounded to the north by a commercially zoned property which is being developed with a public storage facility, a permitted light industrial use. It is consistent with Commercial Goals, such as: 1) promoting attractive, convenient,viable systems of commercial facilities (V); 2) planned clusters of commercial development should be encouraged to improve access (V.A.3); 3) Commercial areas should be located and designed to minimize travel and congestion and to promote safety(V.A.4);4) sufficient access, circulation, walkways and off-street parking and loading should be provided by commercial developments (V.A.5); 5) commercial areas should be compatible with adjacent land uses (V.A.7); 6)various uses within a commercial area should be compatible with each other (V.A.10); and 7) individual stores in an area should follow a common design and landscape theme (V.A.12). Administrative Site Plan Review Report and Decision October 25, 1990 Page 3 Finally,the proposed development generally conforms to the Northeast Area Commercial Development Objective B.1.which states that commercial uses developed ... along Sunset Boulevard N.E. should be oriented within shopping centers or other sizeable complexes. Although not a part of a major shopping center, this development does appear to satisfy this goal because this development is planned to be coordinated with future/existing abutting commercial and light industrial uses. b. Conformance with existing land use regulations; Revised project design/siting as suggested by the proponent in conjunction with land use/environmental review (e.g. height, set backs) and improvements, such as landscaping, parking, lighting and pedestrian linkages conform to requirements established in the Zoning Ordinance. c. Mitigation of impacts to surrounding properties and uses; Potential impacts to the surrounding environment and to neighboring land uses have been identified by staff in the areas of aesthetics/land use (see this Section and Section 8.d), traffic circulation (see Section 8.f), noise (see Section 8.h), light and glare (see Section 8.g). 1) Aesthetics/Land Use The applicant, working with staff, has endeavored to make the proposed commercial development one which is compatible in design and scale with surrounding existing commercial, light industrial and residential developments. The proposed center includes a generally attractive design concept, which is appropriately scaled to the size and configuration of the site. Staff will recommend modifications to the proposed development for the purpose of providing an attractive view from neighboring properties and for vehicles travelling along adjacent corridors. These recommendations include: a) extension of roof treatment to the north side of the structure; b) development of an on-site exterior lighting plan; and c) development of a thematically integrated signage plan. d. Mitigation of impacts of the proposed site plan to the site; Potential impacts to the site have been identified by staff with respect to aesthetics (see also Section 8.c), traffic circulation (see Section 8.f), noise (see Section 8.h.), light and glare(see Section 8.g.). 1) Aesthetics The site plan as proposed by the applicant, and/or as recommended by staff, provides an integrated design theme and a pleasant, efficient environment for consumers and employees. The structure is planned to have generally attractive, durable exterior facades (with proposed extended roofing treatment). With the revised plan, open areas, landscaping, and parking areas have been modified to improve the appearance and effective functioning of the site. e. Conservation of area-wide property values; The proposed new commercial complex is not expected to have a negative impact on property values in the area since this development is designed to: 1) utilize vacant property; 2) be compatible with uses on neighboring properties; and 3) introduce an attractive permitted commercial development. f. Safety and efficiency of vehicle and pedestrian circulation; 1) Off-site Based upon ITE Reports, staff anticipates that the proposed development will generate approximately 427 daily vehicle trip ends. Impacts to adjacent Sunset Boulevard (as well as nearby Anacortes Avenue and Duvall Avenue) are anticipated to be addressed by the Ingress/egress plan, the on-site flow plan,and the joint-access easement with the property due west of the site. This access/circulation plan is designed to promote safe, efficient flow of traffic to the Administrative Site Plan Review Report and Decision October 25, 1990 Page 4 site via two driveways along Sunset Boulevard (the eastern one of which is an ingress/egress route and the western one of which is an ingress route only) and one egress point on Anacortes Avenue, via the property to the west of this site. Signage/lighting which have been proposed by the applicant and/or recommended by the City are also intended to enhance traffic circulation,thereby reducing the likelihood of queueing to access the site or conflicts between entering/exiting traffic (vehicle-vehicle and pedestrian-vehicle). 2) On-site Applicant proposals and City recommendations for access and circulation routes on the site are also designed to protect pedestrian safety and to enhance vehicle circulation. Recommendations are made for: a) provision of signage and lighting of the truck loading area which is adequate to protect truckers and patrons, and which protects abutting residential and commercial properties from light/glare impacts; b)wheel stops to protect vehicles and to preserve abutting areas outside of the circulation routes; c) pedestrian linkage (raised sidewalks, crosswalks) between the site and adjacent rights-of-way; and d) signage and pedestrian- scaled exterior pole lighting to identify/illuminate the structure, vehicle travel routes, parking areas, and pedestrian pathways. g. Provision of adequate light and air; The proposed development has been designed and sited so that the structure is generally well-separated from neighboring sites (except that the rear of a portion of the proposed building immediately abuts the rear of a building on the adjacent storage facility site -- a plan which is proposed to enhance effective, efficient use of this site). This plan allows good exposure to natural light and reduces shadow impacts both to the subject site and to neighboring properties. Exterior pedestrian-scaled pole lighting is planned/recommended to supplement natural light so that the site is fully illuminated in order to mitigate aesthetic impacts as well as to protect personal safety and property. Similarly, design and location of the structure and open spaces generally protects air circulation on-site. h. Mitigation of noise, odors and other harmful or unhealthy conditions; 1) Construction Construction activity will generate some dust and debris. Mitigation measures recommended in conjunction with environmental review are sufficient to address impacts from these proposed activities. 2) Operation The proposed development is not anticipated to generate notable increases in sound levels or to be harmful in any other way. As the structure and exterior illumination fixtures will be located well-away from the right-of-way, on-site activities should not distract vehicle operators on the adjacent roadway. It is possible that some potential uses (such as restaurants) could generate odors; no significant deleterious impact upon environmental health is anticipated from any permitted use on this site. No other harmful or unhealthy conditions are anticipated. i. Availability of public services and facilities to accommodate the proposed use;and The site is adequately served by existing public services and utilities. Neither the Police Department nor the Fire Prevention Bureau has indicated that the proposed facility would place a major burden on their respective services, if code provisions (e.g. signage) are met. Public Works will required development of storm drainage management systems and utilities systems which address Code requirements. j. Prevention of neighborhood deterioration and blight. The proposed facility is expected to have a positive impact on surrounding properties and on the local area as a whole by providing improved service uses which are conveniently Administrative Site Plan Review Report and Decision - October 25, 1990 Page 5 located with respect to two major arterials and to nearby residences. Further, the improvement of the existing structures (coordination of exterior materials, screening of equipment) should enhance both the site and the area and possibly act as a catalyst for new development and/or other redevelopment efforts in the area. Decision: The revised site plan for the Leady Retail Building, file no. ECF; SA-049-90 (dated September/October 1990) is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall comply with all conditions established by the Environmental Review Committee in the Determination of Non-Significance issued June 27, 1990. 0 2&. The applicant, in order to mitigate aesthetic impacts, shall extend the roofing treatment to include the north, west, south and east facades of the structure. This plan is to be approved by the Planning/Building/Public Works Department prior to issuance of site preparation/building permits. 3. The applicant shall, in order to ensure safe, effective circulation and address Parking and Loading Ordinance requirements shall: a) design a cross-easement granting entry access from the subject site to the immediately abutting property to the west and obtaining exit passage rights from the subject site via the Anacortes Avenue access on the immediately abutting property to the west; and b) provide pedestrian linkage between the site and Sunset Boulevard (e.g., marked crosswalks, raised sidewalks). These plans are to be approved by the Planning/Building/Public Works Department prior to issuance of site preparation/building permits. The easement is to,be approved by the City Attorney and recorded prior to the issuance of site preparation/building permits. 4. The applicant shall provide a landscaping maintenance and replacement surety device in an amount equivalent to ten percent of the value of the landscaping, to be valid for a period of three (3) years. The device is to be approved by the City Attorney and provided to the City prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 5. The applicant, in order to protect public safety, shall provide a revised on-site exterior lighting plan, which employs pedestrian-scaled pole lighting and wall mounted lighting sufficient to fully illuminate the site, while directing light toward the interior of the site, and controlling nighttime glare. This plan shall be approved by the Development Planning Section prior to the issuance of site preparation/building permits. 6. The applicant, in order to mitigate aesthetic impacts and address Sign Code requirements, shall provide a thematically integrated signage plan. The plan shall be approved by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of site preparation/building permits. For the purpose of these decisions, the term "should" and "shall"are to be considered mandatory and the term"may" is considered discretionary. Notes to Applicant: An applicant complying with these provisions and willing to hold the City harmless for any expense or damages incurred for work begun prior to the exhaustion of the 14-day appeal period and/or for work which may consequently be stopped by an appeal or work required to be altered or returned to its preconstruction state, may begin construction activities with the issuance of the proper permits. ORDERED this 25th day of October, 1990,_on behalf of the City of Renton Site Plan R Committee. Donald K. Erickson,AICP Secretary TRANSMITTED this 25th day of October, 1990,to the parties of record: Ned Nelson,Architect 3 Lake Bellevue Dr, #200 Bellevue,WA 98005 Administrative Site Plan Review Report and Decision October 25, 1990 Page 6 Chris Leady 2000-124th Ave NE, #B100 Bellevue,WA 98005 TRANSMITTED this 25th day of October, 1990,to the following: Mayor Earl Clymer Lynn Guttmann, Planning/Building/Public Works Director Jim Hanson, Planning/Building/Public Works Ronald Nelson, Building Director Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Members, Renton Planning Commission Glen Gordon, Fire Marshall Arneta Henninger, Public Works Department Lawrence J.Warren, City Attorney Valley Daily News REQUESTS FOR RECONSIDERATION must be filed in writing on or before November 8, 1990. Any, aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Site Plan Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior meeting, may make a written request to the Zoning Administrator for review by the Site Plan Committee within fourteen (14) days of the decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Committee may, after review of the record, take further action as it deems proper. If an appeal is made to the Hearing Examiner, requests for reconsideration will be forwarded to that office for consideration at the same time as the appeal. AN APPEAL TO THE HEARING EXAMINER is governed by Title IV, Section 3011(6)(1),which requires that such appeals be filed directly with the Hearing Examiner. Appeals must be made in writing before 5 p.m. on November 8, 1990, accompanied by a$75.00 fee and other specific requirements. THE APPEARANCE OF FAIRNESS DOCTRINE provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning land use decision. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial committee decision, but to all Request for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the Hearing Examiner. All communications after the decision date must be made in writing through the Zoning Administrator. All communications are public record and this permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence in writing. Any violation of this doctrine could result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. • 5-\. CITE :')F RENTON Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann, Administrator • October 15, 1990 Ned Nelson - Architect ' • • . 3 Lake Bellevue Drive #200 Bellevue, Washington . 98005 • • RE: Leady Retail Building;, 4454 Sunset Boulevard N.E. , (SA 049-90) Dear Mr. Nelson;:, At your, request, we have reviewed the proposed revised site plan - . (dated- October 12 , 1990). for the above-referenced project. - • • Staff. would support the proposed revision's to the site :plan` for design/location .of the' structure, with roof treatment and ' architectural features'to extended to include all building perimeters. Similarly, the proposed fencing, .parking areas, landscaping and service areas: appear satisfactory. However, each of these modifications must .be approved through administrative site plan review. The access route.. connecting the subject site to the abutting Figgins/Bechtold property may be constructed at a location along the common property line which provides direct access to an aisle leading to Anacortes Avenue. The -selected location must be • mutually acceptable, to the property owners. This access route ' should be clearly marked with directional signs. A final plan for this route, together with the easements required by the Environmental Review Committee/Site Plan Administrative Review Committee must be approved by the City prior to the issuance of site preparation/building permits for the Leady Building. . These recommendations are made for the -purpose of ensuring- that development on. this site is both. attractiveand functional, with respect to characteristics ,ofthis 'parcel; and is consistent with existing/future development. on neighboring sites. • • • • 200 Mi11 Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2631 The Administrative Site Plan Review Committee will issue a report on the above-described revised plans by no later than October 30, 1990. If you have questions or would like additional information, please contact me or Lenora Blauman at 235-2550. Sincerely, Dona d K. Erickson, .AICP Zoning Administrator cc: Chris Leady PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON 1 WILLIAM M. BECHTOLD OCT u 3 1990 ATTORNEY AT LAW H'EC fig VED 18032 STARMONT LANE October 1, 1990 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92649 TELEPHONE &FAX(714)846-2667 City of Renton Planning Division Atten: Lenora Blauman TRANSMITTED VIA FAX 200 Mill Avenue South HARD COPY TO FOLLOW Renton, Washington 98055 RE: Reciprocal Easement Agreement Review of New Leady Site Plan Dear Ms. Blauman: Subsequent to my letter to you dated September 14, 1990, a new reciprocal easement agreement has been drafted by counsel associated with Chris Leady. Attorney, Serena Schourup will be sending to you directly a copy of our new proposed reciprocal easement. I would note for the record that I have no problems with this new draft. As you'know, Chris and I have worked a long time on this agreement and I would sincerely hope it can be finalized in the earliest possible time. I am also in receipt of the new Leady site plan. During our telephone conversation late Monday afternoon you requested that I reduce to writing my comments noted in our conversation. Obviously, the landscaping is superior to that proposed in his first plan. The parking seems slightly reduced and the building is now tiled to run parallel with Sunset Boulevard. As long as there is no serious visual impact to our proposed units, I am comfortable with the new plan. The building is a few feet closer to our east property line but farther away from our north property line. On balance, I have not serious objections with the plan and will defer to your administrative review with review with Chris. Thank you for your continuing help. Very truly yours, i' aftif.,1464/ William M. Bechtold WMB:s incls. cc: Chris Leady -4i 0 CITY OF RENTON PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann, Director September 26, 1990 Ned Nelson Architect 3 Lake Bellevue Drive #200 Bellevue, Washington 98005 RE: Leady Retail Building, 4454 Sunset Boulevard N.E. , (SA 049-90) Dear Mr. Nelson: At your request, I have reviewed the proposed revised site plan (dated September 11, 1990) for the above-referenced project with my staff. We continue to believe that the proposed revision is sufficiently significant to require additional administrative site plan review by the City. In such a review, staff would be likely to recommend: 1) That the structure be sited as proposed in the initial application -- with the optional addition of a service entry door at the north end of the west side of the structure and a corridor at the north side of the interior of the building to accommodate service deliveries; 2) That the parking plan be generally accepted as designed in the initially revised plan (August 28 , 1990) , with the addition of wheel stops to all parking stalls, and with adjustments to address the relocation of the structure to be parallel with the north property line of the site; 3) That the landscaping plan be generally accepted as designed in the revised plan dated September 11, 1990 . 4) That the dumpster be placed at the northeast corner or northwest corner of the site and adequately screened with fencing and landscaping. (NOTE: These recommendations are made for the purpose of ensuring that development on this site is both attractive and functional with respect to characteristics of this parcel, and is consistent with existing/future development on neighboring sites. For example, the presently proposed location of the commercial structure creates less than optimally efficient circulation from your site to the adjoining Bechtold site. Additionally, the service area 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2569 F 1 ` T0: CON GM A CONTROL�IJIfNiQE9� A D !/ , t .� f j t, ! 'SS / DATE r f-� `�4' 9t. � i ., I L.LK L t-)-�' : ..... ()U' (. L. r .f-�r ...Amery:: ''Y 'F-• Lim kilt- 1 / p..'.{' t� .. /. f 1 �' 3PU) DRIVER_1 DRIVER 2 - ; :-� CO ZONE CITY/ � r., • ' , ZJ •., s ZONE CUST9MyR N}1MBER- • CHARGE TO t RVICE TYPE`I V CODE CHARGES t „` "•'1 / - \. PP(1 COIL C, - DESCRIPTION OF GOODS(SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS/INFORMATION 1 DRI1(ER PA1VOUT/ETC.) PIECES WEIGHT t� - RIO/1n ! /r ter^ ./�'+ '�ri . k ?�e . [ y - CUST.REF.1/ 4, j` - COST.REF.2 - DECLARED VALUE C.O D.AMOUNT ! CHARGES WAIT TIME WAIT TIME CUST.REF.3 t't SHIPPER� . PICK ER 1 DELf RECEIVED IN GOOD ORDER TOTAL CHARGES IY C .t LL` (7, �,. , � �/ U/G ME DATE) ' I'v*�/�p ,e- /'� P 02 1 k f I - PU. IME /f EF4 UME {i� ENA • COURIERS 0 v F DELIVEFt�' RECEIPT planned for the north side of the building has potential aesthetic , noise, light and glare impacts upon the planned multi-family residential complex to the northwest of your site. Further, the proposed axis of this structure is not in alignment with existing structures in the vicinity; axes which are dissimilar result in a streetscape that is visually unattractive. Discontinuous axes may also necessitate the creation of dissimilar access/circulation routes to individual properties which may result in reduction of safety and efficiency of vehicle and pedestrian travel. ) At this time you may choose to either: 1) adapt your proposal to address conditions established in the Administrative Site Plan Report, by making the above-recommended modifications to the proposed site plan; or 2) request administrative review of your revised plan submitted on September 11, 1990. If you choose to modify the plan at this time, those revisions would, adequately address the Site Plan Review Committee's initial conditions, and would not constitute a sufficiently significant change to the initial plan to require new site plan review. If you wish to have the City undertake formal review of your newly proposed plan, through an administrative review process., you should submit three copies each of the new site plan, the new landscaping plan, and a narrative statement describing the rationale for the proposed site plan. One set of PMTs should also be submitted. If you wish to pursue this option, we would be able to schedule the revisions for review by mid-October. . If you have questions or would like additional information concerning submittals necessary to address initial site plan review conditions or submittals necessary for new review by the Site Plan Review Committee, please contact me at 235-2550. • ely, Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator cc: Chris Leady .FA a� CITX ='OF RENTON Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann, Administrator September 19, 1990 William Bechtold 18032 Starmont Lane Huntington Beach, California 92649 RE: Leady Retail Center (049-90) . Dear Mr. Bechtold: Attached please find a copy of a revision to the Leady Retail Center proposed by Chris Leady. In conjunction with the Cit 's review of this proposed revision, we are interested in hearin! from you about the ways in which these revisions may impact .oth the residential and commercial developments on :your abutti g properties. Of particular interest to the City are: 1) traffic impacts which may occur from the redesign of the route conne ting the Leady property through your site to Anacortes Avenue; a d 2) aesthetic impacts from the relocation of the Leady building to potential commercial development and planned res dential development on your properties. We would appreciate receiviig your comments at your earliest convenience. If you have questions or wo ld like additional information, please contact me at 235-25',0. • Sincerely, 0 Lenora Blauman Project Manage • • 200 Mill Avenue South - R+nton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2631 foisT) CITY OF RENTON Pt'' °_ Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann, Administrator August 29, 1990 Ned Nelson Architect 3 Lake Bellevue Drive #200 V Bellevue, Washington 98005 RE: Leady Retail Building, 4454 Sunset Boulevard N.E. ,_ (SA 049-90) Dear Mr. Nelson: At your request, I have presented the proposed revised site plan for the above-referenced project to Donald Erickson, Zoning Administrator. After evaluating both the proposed plan and the applicable regulations, and consulting with staff in other City departments, we have determined that this revision is sufficiently significant to require new site plan review by the City. If you wish to pursue this route, we would be able to schedule the revisions for review by mid-September. In conjunction with such a review, staff would be likely to recommend that: 1) the structure be relocated as proposed in the initial application -- with the optional addition of a service entry door at the north end of the west side of the structure and a corridor at the north side of the interior of the building to accommodate service deliveries; 2) the parking plan be generally accepted as designed in the revised plan (August 28, 1990) ; V 3) landscaping be placed in, those areas on the front and sides of the site which are not utilized for required parking, related amenities (e.g. sidewalks) and/or service areas. 4) the dumpster be placed at the northeast corner or northwest corner of the site and adequately screened with fencing and landscaping. Alternatively, you may choose to make theabove-recommended modifications at this time. Those suggested modifications would adequately address the Site Plan Review Committee's initial 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2631 conditions, and would not constitute a sufficiently significant change to the initial plan to require new site plan review. If you have questions or would like additional information concerning submittals necessary to address initial site plan review conditions or submittals necessary for new review by the Site Plan Review Committee, please contact me at 235-2550. Sincerely, Le ora Blauman Project Manager cc: Chris Leady • . NIN •••••• ..........::::.....:::......• X'z`:::0 ':.;SE 2V :C .. B ::.MAl.Z,1N.G.::. ::.::.:;;.:•::::::. ::::::::::::. ::::•::: On the day of us� • , 19 410 , I deposited in the mails of he Un 'ted States a sealed envelope containing S►\c ` 1 �cr.tS Imo_ • documents. This information was .sent to: Name Representing NCe=k {.� . • • • • • • • (Signature of Sender) • Subscribed anca sworn to me this — day of 19 � . • ,0q"" n��••• �� PRET�A �♦♦i , `127,/ , • 4. �� NOTARY trip s. • Not. bl in and for the *— St. - o Was ington residing • •. PUBLIC S a t N�1• "G sta..' OZi ♦♦.9>'....:VF s is.e •� th e r i n. ♦♦� Of IAIA C�``,wS�, ::.:.J.>.::.::t;:.:dame:>::<:>: �:>::�:.;: :�:•::�:::>:;:. ::: :> <: ::xo:;ect: N.uiiiber::::>::: .:: ::;:::>:::.:•..;. . .:;;:; •::_ .::;:::::::::::;:::>.;;::.;>;:>;;:: .>:�:.»:.::::;:.;:;�>:�.;:.,..::...�:.:.:.:..:•.:•:..:...:.�..:.:•:..... • ADMINISTRATIVE SITE PLAN REVIEW CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION AUGUST 15, 1990 APPLICATION NO.: ECF; SA-049-90 APPLICANT: Chris Leady LOCATION: 4546 Sunset Blvd. N.E. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 10,500 square foot retail center. The center will be subdivided to suit tenant requirements as space is leased. COMMITTEE REVIEW: Review was conducted after receiving written comment from all divisions of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department, and the Fire, Police, and Parks Departments. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing application, proof of posting and publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No. 2: Site plan (received April 19, 1990). Exhibit No. 3: Landscape plan (received April 19, 1990). Exhibit No. 4: Building elevation plans. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS,AND DECISION Having reviewed the written record in the matter,the City now makes and enters the following: Findings: 1. The applicant, Chris Leady, has requested site plan approval for a 10,500 square foot retail center. The center will be constructed as a single, one-story structure with an articulated facade, stucco siding and gabled metal roofing. The structure is to be located on the north boundary of the site, with parking and landscaping abutting Sunset Boulevard. 2. The applicant's file containing the application, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation,the comments from various City departments,the public notices requesting citizen comment, and other pertinent documents was entered as Exhibit No. 1. 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43.21.C., 1971 as amended), a Determination of Non-Significance- Mitigated was issued for the subject proposal on June 27, 1990, with the following conditions: a. That the applicant, in order to mitigate transportation impacts, provide: a) a fair share contribution of $4426.00 toward the realignment and signalization of the Sunset Boulevard/Anacortes Avenue intersection; and b) restrict access to right in/right out only for the western most ingress/egress point for the subject site. (Note 1.a: The applicant may be called upon to participate in the development of a cross- easement providing entry access from the subject site to the immediately abutting property to the west and obtaining exit passage rights from the subject site via the Anacortes Avenue access on the immediately abutting property to the west. If such an easement is established, it is to be approved by the City Attorney and recorded prior to the issuance of site preparation/building permits.) b. That the applicant, in order to mitigate impacts to the City's sole source aquifer, provide an agreement, in conjunction with site plan review, to submit to the City for approval of proposed specific uses, in order that the City may ascertain that such uses are suitable, or can be improved to be suitable, for development in Zone 2 of the APA. Uses and improvements are to be approved by the Planning Division, the Public Works Department and the Fire Prevention Bureau. The agreement is to be valid for the life of the project, and is to be approved by the City Attorney in advance of the issuance of site preparation/building permits. Administrative Site Plan Review -- Report and Decision August 15, 1990 Page 2 c. That the applicant provide a construction mitigation plan including the following components: 1) an erosion control element; 2) an element for wheel-washing of all construction vehicles prior to leaving the site; 3) an element for watering down the site periodically to control dust and debris; 4) an element for restriction of hauling routes and hours of hauling operations; and e) an element for signage of site and structures during construction to facilitate emergency service provision. These elements/plans are to be approved by the City prior to issuance of site preparation/building permits. (Note 1.c.: The applicant shall ensure that the construction mitigation plan is made a part of the contractor's agreements.) In addition, staff recommend: d. That the applicant, in order to mitigate recreation impacts, be encouraged to make a voluntary contribution toward the development of public recreation facilities in the area which may be utilized by the center's employees and/or consumers. (NOTE #1: At the time of site plan review and/or building permit review, staff will recommend conditions including, but not limited to: 1) extension of roof treatment to the east and west sides of the structure; 2) redesign of the parking area to reduce 53 provided spaces to 44 required spaces, including the elimination of the four parallel parking spaces, in order to ensure safe, effective circulation; 3) introduction of additional landscaping to provide a more visually pleasing environment; 4) development of an on-site exterior lighting plan to illuminate the site; 5) development of a thematically integrated signage plan; 6) development of storm drainage management systems; and 7) development of utility service systems. (NOTE #2: At the time of building standard off-site improvements will be required for this development.) 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all City departments affected by the impact of this proposal. 5. The site plan as presented, provides sufficient parking to comply with the Parking and Loading Ordinance of the City of Renton. 6. The subject site was annexed into the City in 1974 by the Adoption of Ordinance No. 2894. The site was zoned B-1, Business District on September 23, 1985 by Ordinance No. 3943. 7. Land use surrounding the subject site is commercial uses and multi-family residential uses. 8. The applicant's site plan complies with the requirements for information for site plan review. Review of the application was conducted based upon Section 4-31-33 (D,1) of the Zoning Ordinance (Site Plan Review)together with all other relevant information, as follows: a. Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan, its elements and policies; The proposed development is permitted for this property under the Commercial designation on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. Similarly,the development conforms with Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies. For example, the proposed development is consistent with Urban Design Goals calling for development to be allowed only where it can be shown to be compatible with future uses in the vicinity (III.A.1). The property is surrounded to the east, west and south by parcels zoned for commercial use; those parcels are now developed or planned for development in the near future. It is bounded to the north by a commercially zoned property which is being developed with a public storage facility, a permitted light industrial use. It is consistent with Commercial Goals, such as: 1) promoting attractive, convenient,viable systems of commercial facilities (V); 2) planned clusters of commercial development should be encouraged to improve access (V.A.3); 3) Commercial areas should be located and designed to minimize travel and congestion and to promote safety(V.A.4); 4) sufficient access, circulation, walkways and off-street parking and loading should be provided by commercial developments (V.A.5); 5) commercial areas should be compatible with adjacent land uses (V.A.7); 6)various uses within a commercial area should be compatible with each other (V.A.10); and 7) individual stores in an area should follow a common design and landscape theme (V.A.12). Administrative Site Plan Review Report and Decision August 15, 1990 Page 3 Finally,the proposed development generally conforms to the Northeast Area Commercial Development Objective B.1.which states that commercial uses developed ... along Sunset Boulevard N.E. should be oriented within shopping centers or other sizeable complexes. Although not a part of a major shopping center, this development does appear to satisfy this goal because this development is planned to be coordinated with future/existing abutting commercial and light industrial uses. b. Conformance with existing land use regulations; Project design/siting as suggested by the proponent and/or as recommended by staff in conjunction with land use/environmental review (e.g. height, set backs) and improvements, such as landscaping, parking, lighting and pedestrian linkages -- conform to requirements established in the Zoning Ordinance. c. Mitigation of impacts to surrounding properties and uses; Potential impacts to the surrounding environment and to neighboring land uses have been identified by staff in the areas of aesthetics/land use (see this Section and Section 8.d), traffic circulation (see Section 8.f), noise (see Section 8.h), light and glare (see Section 8.g). 1) Aesthetics/Land Use The applicant, working with staff, has endeavored to make the proposed commercial development one which is compatible in design and scale with surrounding existing commercial, light industrial and residential developments. The proposed/recommended center includes a generally attractive design concept,which is appropriately scaled to the size and configuration of the site. Staff will recommend modifications to the proposed development for the purpose of providing an attractive view from neighboring properties and for vehicles travelling along adjacent corridors. These recommendations include: a) extension of roof treatment to the east and west sides of the structure; b) redesign of the parking area; c) introduction of additional landscaping to provide a more visually pleasing environment; d) development of an on-site exterior lighting plan; and e) development of a thematically integrated signage plan. d. Mitigation of impacts of the proposed site plan to the site; Potential impacts to the site have been identified by staff with respect to aesthetics (see also Section 8.c), traffic circulation (see Section 8.f), noise (see Section 8.h.), light and glare (see Section 8.g.). 1) Aesthetics The site plan as proposed by the applicant, and/or as recommended by staff, provides an integrated design theme and a pleasant, efficient environment for consumers and employees. The structure is planned to have generally attractive, durable exterior facades (with proposed extended roofing treatment). Open areas, landscaping, parking areas, illumination and signage will be recommended to be modified to improve the appearance and effective functioning of the site. e. Conservation of area-wide property values; The proposed new commercial complex is not expected to have a negative impact on property values in the area since this development is designed to: 1) utilize vacant property; 2) be compatible with uses on neighboring properties; and 3) introduce an attractive permitted commercial development. f. Safety and efficiency of vehicle and pedestrian circulation; 1) Off-site Based upon ITE Reports, staff anticipates that the proposed development will generate approximately 427 daily vehicle trip ends. Impacts to adjacent Sunset Boulevard (as well as nearby Anacortes Avenue and Duvall Avenue) are anticipated to be addressed by the ingress/egress plan,the on-site flow plan,and the joint-access easement with the property due west of the site. This Administrative Site Plan Review Report and Decision August 15, 1990 Page 4 • access/circulation plan is designed to promote safe, efficient flow of traffic to the site via two driveways along Sunset Boulevard (the eastern one of which is an ingress/egress route and the western one of which is an ingress route only) and one egress point on Anacortes Avenue, via the property to the west of this site. Signage/lighting which have been proposed by the applicant and/or recommended by the City are also intended to enhance traffic circulation,thereby reducing the likelihood of queueing to access the site or conflicts between entering and exiting traffic (vehicle-vehicle and/or pedestrian-vehicle). 2) On-site Applicant proposals and City recommendations for access and circulation routes on the site are also designed to protect pedestrian safety and to enhance vehicle circulation. Recommendations are made for: a) provision of parking/loading areas on-site which are adequate to serve consumers and which are coordinated in a manner which is compatible with on-site circulation routes; b) wheel stops to protect vehicles and to preserve abutting areas outside of the circulation routes; c) pedestrian linkage (raised sidewalks, crosswalks) between the site and adjacent rights-of-way; and d) signage and pedestrian-scaled exterior pole lighting to identify/illuminate the structure, vehicle travel routes, parking areas, and pedestrian pathways. g. Provision of adequate light and air; The proposed development has been designed and sited so that the structure is generally well-separated from neighboring sites (except that the rear of this building immediately abuts the rear of a building on the adjacent storage facility site--a plan which is proposed to enhance effective, efficient use of this site). This plan allows good exposure to natural light and reduces shadow impacts both to the subject site and to neighboring properties. Exterior pedestrian-scaled pole lighting is planned/recommended to supplement natural light so that the site is fully illuminated in order to mitigate aesthetic impacts as well as to protect personal safety and property. Similarly, design and location of the structure and open spaces generally protects air circulation on-site. h. Mitigation of noise, odors and other harmful or unhealthy conditions; 1) Construction Construction activity will generate some dust and debris. Mitigation measures recommended in conjunction with environmental review are sufficient to address impacts from these proposed improvements. 2) Operation The proposed development is not anticipated to generate notable increases in sound levels or to be harmful in any other way. Because the structure and exterior illumination fixtures are to be located well- away from the right-of-way, on-site activities should not distract vehicle operators on adjacent rights-of-way. It is possible that some potential uses (such as restaurants) could generate odors; no significant deleterious impact upon environmental health is anticipated from any permitted use on this site. No other harmful or unhealthy conditions are anticipated. Availability of public services and facilities to accommodate the proposed use;and The site is adequately served by existing public services and utilities. Neither the Police Department nor the Fire Prevention Bureau has indicated that the proposed facility would place a major burden on their respective services, if code provisions (e.g. signage) are met. Public Works will required development of storm drainage management systems and utilities systems which address Code requirements. Administrative Site Plan Review Report and Decision August 15, 1990 Page 5 j. Prevention of neighborhood deterioration and blight. The proposed facility is expected to have a positive impact on surrounding properties and on the local area as a whole by providing improved service uses which are conveniently located with respect to two major arterials and to nearby residences. Further, the improvement of the existing structures (coordination of exterior materials, screening of equipment) should enhance both the site and the area and possibly act as a catalyst for new development and/or other redevelopment efforts in the area. Decision: The site plan for the Leady Retail Building,file no. ECF; SA-049-90 is subject to the following conditions: 1. That the applicant comply with all conditions established by the Environmental Review Committee in the Determination of Non-Significance issued June 27, 1990. 2. That the applicant, in order to mitigate aesthetic impacts, shall extend the roofing treatment proposed for the south facade of the structure to the eastern and western facades. This plan is to be approved by the Planning Division prior to issuance of site preparation/building permits. 3. That the applicant, in order to ensure safe, effective circulation and address Parking and Loading Ordinance requirement: a) redesign the parking plan to facilitate implementation of the vehicular cross-easement; b) redesign the parking plan to reduce the fifty-three (53) provided spaces to forty-four (44) required spaces (with wheel stops), including the elimination of the four parallel parking spaces; and c) provide improved pedestrian linkage between the site and Sunset Boulevard (e.g., marked crosswalks, raised sidewalks). These plans are to be approved by the Planning Division prior to issuance of site preparation/building permits. 4. That the applicant, in order to ensure safe, effective circulation, shall provide a cross-easement granting entry access from the subject site to the immediately abutting property to the west and obtaining exit passage rights from the subject site via the Anacortes Avenue access on the immediately abutting property to the west. The easement is to be approved by the City Attorney and recorded prior to the issuance of site preparation/building permits. 5. That the applicant, in order to provide a more visually pleasing environment, shall provide a landscaping plan which includes increased number, size,and diversity of plantings throughout the site, with particular attention to the western, northern and southern boundaries, the area abutting the structure, and the parking area. The plan shall be approved by the Planning Division prior to site preparation/building permits. 6. That the applicant shall provide a landscaping maintenance surety device in an amount equivalent to ten percent of the value of the landscaping, to be valid for a period of three (3) years. The device is to be approved by the City Attorney and provided to the City prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 7. That the applicant, in order to protect public safety;, shall provide a revised on-site exterior lighting plan, which employs pedestrian-scaled pole lighting sufficient to fully illuminate the site, while directing light toward the interior of the site, and controlling nighttime glare. This plan shall be approved by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of site preparation/building permits. 8. That the applicant, in order to mitigate aesthetic impacts and address Sign Code requirements, provide a thematically integrated signage plan. The plan shall be approved by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of site preparation/building permits. For the purpose of these decisions, the term "should" and "shall"are to be considered mandatory and the term"may"is considered discretionary. Notes to Applicant: An applicant complying with these provisions and willing to hold the City harmless for any expense or damages incurred for work begun prior to the exhaustion of the 14-day appeal period and/or for work Administrative Site Plan Review Report and Decision August 15, 1990 Page 6 which may consequently be stopped by an appeal or work required to be altered or returned to its preconstruction state, may begin construction activities with the issuance of the proper permits. ORDERED this 15th day of August. 1990, on behalf of the City of Renton Committee. 17-1 4,1t Donald K. Erickson,Al P Zoning Administrator TRANSMITTED this 15th day of August. 1990,to the parties of record: Ned Nelson,Architect 3 Lake Bellevue Dr, #200 • Bellevue,WA 98005 Chris Leady 2000- 124th Ave NE, #B100 Bellevue,WA 98005 TRANSMITTED this 15th day of August. 1990,to the following: Mayor Earl Clymer Lynn Guttmann, Planning/Building/Public Works Director Jim Hanson, Planning/Building/Public Works Ronald Nelson, Building Director Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Members, Renton Planning Commission Glen Gordon, Fire Marshall Arneta Henninger, Public Works Department Lawrence J.Warren, City Attorney Valley Daily News REQUESTS FOR RECONSIDERATION must be filed in writing on or before August 29, 1990.Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Site Plan Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior meeting, may make a written request to the Zoning Administrator for review by the Site Plan Committee within fourteen (14) days of the decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Committee may,after review of the record,take further action as it deems proper. If an appeal is made to the Hearing Examiner, requests for reconsideration will be forwarded to that office for consideration at the same time as the appeal. AN APPEAL TO THE HEARING EXAMINER is governed by Title IV, Section 3011(B)(1),which requires that such appeals be filed directly with the Hearing Examiner. Appeals must be made in writing before 5 p.m. on August 29. 1990,accompanied by a$75.00 fee and other specific requirements. THE APPEARANCE OF FAIRNESS DOCTRINE provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning land use decision. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial committee decision, but to all Request for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the Hearing Examiner. All communications after the decision date must be made in writing through the Zoning Administrator. All communications are public record and this permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence in writing. Any violation of this doctrine could result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. 44%,„ - . CITI OF RENTON Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann, Administrator City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Memorandum Date: August 6, 1990 To: Lawrence Warren City Attorney From: Lenora Blauman Project Manager Subject: Cross-Access Easement for Figgins Property (ShPl ; R; SA 100-89) and Leady Property (SA 049-90) City Council has required a cross-access easement to link the Figgins Property, at 4444 Sunset Boulevard to the adjacent Leady property at 4546 Sunset Boulevard. I have attached a draft of that document prepared by William Bechtold. I would appreciate your review and comment by August 21, 1990. Thank you. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2631 OT I C e • ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION ECF;SA-049-90 APPLICATION NO. PROPOSED ACTION LEADY RETAIL BUILDING CHRISTOPHER LEADY APPLICANT SEEKS SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR A 10,500 SQUARE FOOT RETAIL CENTER. THE CENTER WILL BE SUBDIVIDED TO SUIT TENANT REQUIREMENTS AS SPACE IS LEASED. GENERAL LOCATION AND OR ADDRESS 4546 SUNSET BOULEVARD POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE CE.R.C.] HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION n00ES <(DO.ES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT fW1/ILL WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., AI iGI IST R 1990• FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION • CERTIFICATION I , 404i,f n n. piF't / p , ' HEREBY CERTIFY THAT COPIES OF • THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN CONSPICUOUS PLAC-ES !ONS'V,R NEARBY THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY . ON ATT-EST Subscribed and sworn to before me, a / qQ N�Tory Pub=� in and /.r the St.te of Washington / • a s�citw -n11_ i/ �� , on the iS� SIGN ' :JaY ji E D ,i \f " Nn.,L CITY OF RENTON PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn. Guttmann, Director July 20, 1990 Ned Nelson,Architect 3 Lk Bellevue Dr, #200 Bellevue, WA 98005 SUBJECT: Leady Retail Building ECF;SA-049-90 Dear Mr. Nelson: This letter is to inform you that the comment period has ended for the Determination of Non-Significance- Mitigated for the above-referenced project. No substantive comments were received. The Committee's determination is final and may be appealed to the City's Hearing Examiner no later than 5:00 p.m. on August 6, 1990. Any appeal must state clearly why the determination should be revised and must be accompanied by a non-refundable$75.00 filing fee. If you have questions or desire clarification of the above, please call Lenora Blauman at 235-2550. For the Environmental Review Committee, Donald K. Erickson, AICP Chief, Current Planning cc: Chris Leady 2000- 124th Ave NE, #B100 Bellevue, WA 98005 • strtapel/DKE/kac 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2569 oor-or o y : WILLIAM M. BECHTOLD • ATTORNEY AT LAW 18032 STARMONT LANE HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92649 July 19, 1990 TELEPHONE &FAX(714)846-2667 Mr. Chris C. Leady PLANNING DIVISION 2000 124th Avenue N.E. CITY OF RENTON Building B - Suite 100 Bellevue, Washington 98005 JUL 2 3 1990 City of Renton EE Atten: Donald K. Erickson . ! Zoning Administrator 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 RE: Cross-Access Easements Gentlemen: As you are well aware, the Renton City Council has upheld our appeal from the Hearing Examiner's decision thus granting us the short plat that we desired as well as rezoning the northern portion of our lot to a R-3 zoning. Condition #2 of their approval states: "2 . The Applicant shall provide to the city for approval a copy of the cross-easements between applicant and Leady. " We have agreed that the cross-access easements should line up with those 20 ' ingress/egress easements previously granted and. shown on Lot 2 of Short Plat 052-88 ("Leady Short Plat") . The joint access point would begin 89 ' south of the northwest corner of Lot 2 of the Leady Short Plat and continue running south for 24 ' . The joint access will be memorialized by a three party agreement between the Leady group, Floyd and Jean Figgins (the current property owners of our parcel) and the City of Renton. I would propose that the following points be included in that agreement: (1) Each landowner grants an easement across their respective land to the other landowner for vehicular and pedestrian traffic at the 24 ' access point. The actual easement portion running through the respective properties shall be later defined by the grantors. (2) Neither landowner shall have any further rights or duties to participate in any future LID's within 500 ' of said cross-access easement merely because of the granting of these cross-access easements. Please note, as a A • • condition of our being granted the zoning change, short plat and specific site plan approval, we have agreed to participate in any future LID to both realign Anacortes Avenue as well a signalize its intersection with NW Sunset Boulevard. (3) The grantee of said easements shall have the right to construct a temporary road over the grantor's land until such time as the grantor's property is developed with building and/or driveway improvements. (4) the granting of these easements shall not imply any rights of cross-easement parking on either of the grantor' s or grantee's land. (5) This agreement is condition on Leady being granted at least right turn egress from that portion of the 20 ' ingress/egress easement fronting on NE Sunset Boulevard as shown on Lot 2 of the Leady Short Plat. Don, Lenora Blauman requested that I forward to her a copy of the legal description for each lot. Enclosed are those descriptions for your files. I would appreciate both of you reviewing these suggested points for the agreement and getting back to me with your comments as soon as possible. Thanks for your time and assistance. Very truly yours, 7/i/74/ William M. Bechtold WMB:s incls. AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION 51067 ,being first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DEVALLEY DAILY NEWS ENVIRONMENTALTREVIEWN REVIEW COMMITTEE • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition REronmeTON,WASHINGTONlReview Committee Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non- Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week. That said newspapers Significance Mitigated for the following pro are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six Municct(s) under the authorityl of the Renton gMunicipal Code. The following Applicant(s) months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published have completed a mitigation process: in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King LEADY RETAIL BUILDING County, Washington. The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 10,500 square foot retail center. The center King County. will be subdivided to suit tenant require- ments as space is leased. The project is d. The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Kent Edition locatedFurtat 4546rSunset regardingBa this information this action Renton Edition1,A , Auburn Edition z' , (and not in is available in the Planning Division, Munici- supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers pal Building, Renton,Washington 235-2550. duringthe below statedperiod. The annexed notice a This Determination is FINAL. There is a Pu u 1 i C Jo C fourteen (14) day appeal period which will end at 5:00 p.m. on August 6, 1990. Any (-Lavir3n:dental Determination) 4,361 appeal of this decision may be made to the City's Hearing Examiner, Municipal Build- ing, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, Wash- was published on Jul V 23, l' _) - ington 98055. An appeal must state clearly, in writing, why the Determination should be revised and must be accompanied by a non-refundable $75.00 filing fee. The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the Published in the Valley Daily News on sum of$2 • v July 23, 1990. 4361 7aUlie4,0 410--0— A/ Subscribed and sworn before me this 3 rr�_day of II r u t 19 9 0 Notary Public for the State of Washington residing at-Aubur King County, Washington VDN 487 Revised 4/89 NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has Issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated for the following project(s) under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code.: 'The following Applicant(s) have completed a mitigation process: LEADY RETAIL BUILDING • ECF;SA-049-90 Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 10,500 square foot retail center.•The center will be subdivided to suit tenant requirements as space is leased. The project is located at 4546 Sunset Boulevard. Further information regarding this action is available in the Planning'Division, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington,235-2550. This Determination is FINAL. There is a fourteen (14) day appeal period which will end at 5:00 p.m. on August'6, 1990. Any appeal of this decision, may be made to the City's Hearing Examiner, Municipal Building, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton,`Washington 98b55. An appeal must state clearly, in writing,why the.Determination should be revised and must be accompanied by a non-refundable $75.00 filing fee. .. . Publication Date: July 23, 1990 Account No. 51067 • i Washington State Duane Berentson Department of Transportation Secretary of Transportation District 1 15325 S.E. 30th Place Bellevue,Washington 98007-6538 (206)562-4000 July 3 , 1990 PLANNING DIVISION TO: Lenora Blauman CITY OF RENTON Senior Planner Planning Division JUL 5 �990 Community Development Department 200 Mill Avenue South RECEIVED Renton, Wa. 98055 SR 900 M.P. 14. 15 C. S. 171300 Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance Leady Retail Building File ECF-049-90 FROM: JAMES L. LUTZ, P.E. , Utilities/Developer Services Engineer Washington State Department of Transportation District 1 15325 SE 30th Place, MS 113 Bellevue, WA 98007-6597 Thank you for giving us the opportunity to review this document. Our response is checked below. XX We have reviewed the subject document and have no comments. We concur with the mitigation imposed. We have already submitted comments on this project. Our comments are included in our letter dated from to . We have no further comments on this project. We have reviewed the subject document and request the applicant provide further information. We concur with the mitigation except: Please contact Robert Eichelsdoerfer of my Developer Services Section at PHONE: 562-4297, SCAN 638-4297, if you have any questions. RTE:rte State of - --_ - --__------ _ e, - Washington Q DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION • ;• .v; _ {`� �i'�. =ry r ., y District 1 15325 S.E.30th Place,Bellevue,WA 98007-6538 s•_ 3� JUL 3'gp ias9�° (206)562-4000 `v , q_ E �r•. Ms . Lenora Blauman City of Renton Community Development Dept. 200 Mill Ave. S. 41, Renton, WA 98055 ,7_ , ____ i , .. ......, N ,our lc E • ENVIRON M E.NTAL DECLARATION • • APPLICATION NO. ECF;SA-049-90 PROPOSED ACTION LEADY RETAIL BUILDING CHRISTOPHER LEADY APPLICANT SEEKS SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR A 10,500 SQUARE FOOT RETAIL CENTER. THE CENTER WILL BE SUBDIVIDED TO SUIT TENANT REQUIREMENTS AS SPACE IS LEASED. GENERAL LOCATION AND OR ADDRESS 4546 SUNSET BOULEVARD POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (E.R.C.3 HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION EIDOES U1DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT f1WILL NIWILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY JULY 17, 1990 AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE - WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION CERTIFICATION I , I • feze.1 , ' HEREBY CERTIFY THAT c, COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMEN/IWERE POSTED BY ME IN • c.3 CONSPICUOUS PLA,C'ESOR NEARBY THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY ON 6 - ' ,ATTEST= Subscribed and sworn to before me, a -',,,,• _ ICOCary:Public 'n and f the State of Washington • r,- s i, t;> >n /�` on the e(/__ vY� �" SIGNED : • • .Z.T ... F...RE . . RE GUR �.•::..::..::..::.�::....:.:. :.:•::....::: :;.;pL7�NN.ING;.::b:I V�S TO .;.:>.:»: • • • • • • .. �'FIDAV.I'I�...O.�'.:.;S•E�2V.�. .::. . .::: . On the 2.°7 day of I .c„ 19 1 D I deposited in the mails of the United States asealed envelope containing 4=1c�cirmvvva.:1101 c_c-te-I tits documents . This infoLmation was .sent to: Name Representing 1 e-0 riPl'annUt IcJl1/41Gle-SL, cbr (2Lii tic \oc,_ elret-f3t. ofN • ca- „n,e, • (Signature of Sender) e ,-"AgraL • Subscribed and sworn to me this jqek. day o � 19 .0„ tAA, :, - Notary ' 't.lic in and •-.r the State .f wa ingto . iding �` at , • ` ther in • • "i . . . .. ..... ............ .. .. :. .. ro e� , CITY--JF RENTON Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann,Director • June 29, 1990 Ned Nelson,Architect 3 Lk Bellevue Dr, #200 - Bellevue,WA 98005 Re: Leady Retail Building ECF;SA-049-90 Dear Mr. Nelson: This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee and is to inform you that they have completed their review of the environmental impacts of the above referenced project. The Committee, on June 27, 1990, decided that your project may be issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with the following conditions: 1. That the applicant, in order to mitigate transportation impacts, provide: a) a fair share contribution of $4426.00 toward the realignment and signalization of the Sunset Boulevard/Anacortes Avenue intersection; and b) restrict access to right in/right out only for the western most ingress/egress point for the subject site. (Note 1.a: The applicant may be called upon to participate in the development of a cross-easement providing entry access from the subject site to the immediately abutting property to the west and obtaining exit passage rights from the subject site via the Anacortes Avenue access on the immediately abutting property to the west. If such an easement is established, it is to be approved by the City Attorney and recorded prior to the issuance of site preparation/building permits.) 2. That the applicant, in order to mitigate impacts to the City's sole source aquifer, provide an agreement, in conjunction with site plan review, to submit to the City for approval of proposed specific uses, in order that the City may ascertain that such uses are suitable, or can be improved to be suitable, for development in Zone 2 of the APA. Uses and improvements are to be approved by the Planning Division, the Public Works Department and the Fire Prevention Bureau. The agreement is to be valid for the life of the project, and is to be approved by the City Attorney in advance of the issuance of site preparation/building permits. 3. That the applicant provide a construction mitigation plan including the following components: a) an erosion control element; b) an element for wheel-washing of all construction vehicles prior to leaving the site; c) an element for watering down the site periodically to control dust and debris; d) an element for restriction of hauling routes and hours of hauling operations; and e) an element for signage of site and structures during construction to facilitate emergency service provision. These elements/plans are to be approved by the City prior to issuance of site preparation/ building permits. (Note 6.a.:The applicant shall ensure that the construction mitigation plan is made a part of the contractor's agreements.) • 1 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2631 4 Ned Nelson Leady Retail Building June 29, 1990 Page 2 In addition, staff recommend: 4. That the applicant, in order to mitigate recreation impacts, be encouraged to make a voluntary contribution toward the development of public recreation facilities in the area which may be utilized by the center's employees and/or consumers. (NOTE #1: At the time of site plan review and/or building permit review, staff will recommend conditions including, but not limited to: 1) extension of roof treatment to the east and west sides of the structure; 2) redesign of the parking area to reduce 53 provided spaces to 44 required spaces, including the elimination of the four parallel parking spaces, in order to ensure safe, effective circulation; 3) introduction of additional landscaping to provide a more visually pleasing environment; 4) development of an on-site exterior lighting plan to illuminate the site; 5) development of a thematically integrated signage plan; 6) development of storm drainage management systems; and 7) development of utility service systems. (NOTE#2: At the time of building, standard off-site improvements will be required for this development.) Because the Environmental Review Committee imposed specific mitigation measures rather than issue a Determination of Significance,there is a required fifteen (15) day comment period during which comments are solicited from various agencies, jurisdictions or individuals (including the applicant) who may have an interest in the Committee's decision. The comment period will end July 17, 1990. Following the end of the comment period, the City will finalize its Determination unless comments received require a reevaluation. Following the finalization of the Determination,there is a required fourteen (14) day appeal period. Staff urges you to contact the various City representatives, as appropriate, (e.g. the Public Works Department) as soon as possible, to obtain more information concerning specific mitigation elements recommended for this project, if you have specific questions. This information will assist you in planning for implementation of your project and will enable you to exercise your appeal rights more fully, if you choose to do so. In addition, by the end of the comment period, we should be able to establish a tentative public hearing date before the Hearing Examiner, should a public hearing be necessary. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call Lenora Blauman or me at 235- 2550. for the nvironmental R iew or/i ee, Donald-K. ric son, AIC Chief, Current Planning DKE:kac cc: Chris Leady 2000- 124th Ave NE, #B100 Bellevue, WA 98005 • • 1123 .a8 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION 51067 Kathleen Hoover ,being first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the VALLEY DAILY NEWS NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON Dailynewspapers six (6) times a week. That said newspapers The as i issued atal Review Committeeofpublished (ERC) has Determination of Non- are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six Significance-Mitigated for the following months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed, and published project(s)under the authority of the Renton in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King - Municipal Code. LEADY County, Washington. The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal ECF;S RETAIL BUILDING CF;SA-049-90 newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for Applicant seeks site plan approval for a King County. 10,500 square foot retail center. The cen- ter will be subdivided to suit tenant requirements as space is leased.The pro- The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Kent Edition ject is located at 4546 Sunset Boulevard. XX , Renton Edition XX , Auburn Edition _XX , (and not in This decision will be finalized in fifteen (15)days.Written comments received after supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers 5:00 p.m., July 17, 1990, will not be con- during the below stated period. The annexed notice a Public Notice sidered. A fourteen(14)day appeal period will commence following the finalization of (Environmental Determination) 4273 DNS-M.The mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the was July y published 2 , 1990 Planning Division located on the Third Floor of the Municipal Building Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. Published in the Valley Daily News July The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the 2, 1990. 4273 sum of$ 23 . 28 Xata.ti/K) • Subscribed and sworn before me this 12 t h day of u 1 Y 19 9 0 r No Public for the State of Washington residing at Auburn, King County, Washington VDN 487 Revised 4/89 ri i NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE _RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated for the following project(s) under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. LEADY RETAIL BUILDING ECF;SA-049-90 Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 10,500 square foot retail center. The center will be subdivided to suit tenant requirements as space is leased. The project is located at 4546 Sunset Boulevard. This decision will be finalized in fifteen (15) days. Written comments received after 5:00 p.m., July 17, 1990,will not be considered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period will commence following the.finalization of DNS-M. The mitigation measures imposed by. the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Planning Division.,located on the Third Floor of the Municipal Building Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235- 2550. Publication Date: July 2,.1990 Account No. 51067 _r f N OT E ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION APPLICATION NO. ECF;SA-049-90 PROPOSED ACTION LEADY RETAIL BUILDING CHRISTOPHER LEADY APPLICANT SEEKS SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR A 10,500 SQUARE FOOT RETAIL CENTER. THE CENTER WILL BE SUBDIVIDED TO SUIT TENANT REQUIREMENTS AS SPACE IS LEASED. GENERAL LOCATION AND OR ADDRESS 4546 SUNSET BOULEVARD • POSTED TO NOTIFY. INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE [ E. R.C. ] HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION E JDOES DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT ❑WILL INZWILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY JULY 17, 1990 AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., • FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION AT 2 3 5-2 5 5 0. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION CITE ,'OF RENTON "LL Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann,Director June 29, 1990 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section Mail Stop PV-11 Olympia,WA 98504 Re: Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith are copies of Environmental Determinations and Environmental Checklists for those projects reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee on June 27,,1990: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED LEADY RETAIL BUILDING ECF;SA-049-90 Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 10,500 square foot retail center. The center will be subdivided to suit tenant requirements as space is leased. The project is located at 4546 Sunset Boulevard. The fifteen (15) day comment period for these projects will end on July 17, 1990. Following the end of the comment period, the City will finalize it's Determination unless comments received require a reevaluation. Following the finalization of the Determination,there is a required fourteen (14) day appeal period. .+ If you have questions, please call Lenora Blauman or me at 235-2550. For the Environmental Review Committee, Qii)t Donald K. Erickson, AICP Chief, Current Planning DKE:kac cc: Mr. Craig Larson, King County Planning Division Mr. Gregory M. Bush, Metro Department of Wildlife Mr. Joe Robels, Department of Fisheries Mr. James Lutz, Department of Transportation Ms. Connie Corpuz, City of Seattle 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2631 CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO.: ECF-049-90 APPLICATION NO(S): SA-049-90 PROPONENT: Christopher Leady PROJECT NAME: Leady Retail Building DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 10,500 square foot retail center. The center will be subdivided to suit tenant requirements as space is leased. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 4546 Sunset Boulevard LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Community Development Department Current Planning Division The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-2822(D) Renton Municipal Code (see attached sheet). These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. This Determination of Non-Significance -Mitigated (DNS-M) is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2). Because mitigation measures have been imposed,the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fifteen(15) days from July 2, 1990. Any interested party may submit written comments which must be submitted by 5:00 p.m., July 17, 1990, in order to be considered. A fourteen (14)day appeal period will commence following the finalization of the DNS-M. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee c/o Don Erickson, Chief, Current Planning Current Planning Division Community Development Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton,WA 98055 PUBLICATION DATE: July 2, 1990 DATE OF DECISION: June 27, 1990 SIGNATURES: Lynn A G m n, D rector Public ks epartment John ebley,Actin Executive As stant to Mayor DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED MITIGATION MEASURES PROJECT: Leady Retail Building PROPONENT: Christopher Leady ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF;SA-049-90 APPLICATION NUMBER: ECF;SA-049-90 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 10,500 square foot retail center. The center will be subdivided to suit tenant requirements as space is leased. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 4546 Sunset Boulevard RECOMMENDATIONS: The Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with the following conditions: TRANSPORTATION 1. That the applicant, in order to mitigate transportation impacts, provide: a) a fair share contribution of $4426.00 toward the realignment and signalization of the Sunset Boulevard/Anacortes Avenue intersection; and b) restrict access to right in/right out only for the western most ingress/egress point for the subject site. (Note 1.a: The applicant may be called upon to participate in the development of a cross- easement providing entry access from the subject site to the immediately abutting property to the west and obtaining exit passage rights from the subject site via the Anacortes Avenue access on the immediately abutting property to the west. If such an easement is established, it is to be approved by the City Attorney and recorded prior to the issuance of site preparation/building permits.) AQUIFER PROTECTION 2. That the applicant, in order to mitigate impacts to the City's sole source aquifer, provide an agreement, in conjunction with site plan review, to submit to the City for approval of proposed specific uses, in order that the City may ascertain that such uses are suitable, or can be improved to be suitable, for development in Zone 2 of the APA. Uses and improvements are to be approved by the Planning Division, the Public Works Department and the Fire Prevention Bureau. The agreement is to be valid for the life of the project, and is to be approved by the City Attorney in advance of the issuance of site preparation/building permits. CONSTRUCTION 3. That the applicant provide a construction mitigation plan including the following '- components: a) an erosion control element; b) an element for wheel-washing of all construction vehicles prior to leaving the site; c) an element for watering down the site periodically to control dust and debris; d) an element for restriction of hauling routes and hours of hauling operations; mmdoc- 1 • and e) an element for signage of site and structures during construction to facilitate emergency service provision. These elements/plans are to be approved by the City prior to issuance of site preparation/ building permits. (Note 6.a.: The applicant shall ensure that the construction mitigation plan is made a part of the contractor's agreements.) In addition, staff recommend: RECREATION 4. That the applicant, in order to mitigate recreation impacts, be encouraged to make a voluntary contribution toward the development of public recreation facilities in the area which may be utilized by the center's employees and/or consumers. (NOTE #1: At the time of site plan review and/or building permit review, staff will recommend conditions including, but not limited to: 1) extension of roof treatment to the east and west sides of the structure; 2) redesign of the parking area to reduce 53 provided spaces to 44 required spaces, including the elimination of the four parallel parking spaces, in order to ensure safe, effective circulation; 3) introduction of additional landscaping to provide a more visually pleasing environment; 4) development of an on-site exterior lighting plan to illuminate the site; 5) development of a thematically integrated signage plan; 6) development of storm drainage management systems; and 7) development of utility service systems. (NOTE#2:At the time of building, standard off-site improvements will be required for this development.) mmdoc-2 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE TAFF .................................................................... .......... .......REPORT ........................................................................... ....................... ............................... •••• ••••••••••••••••••••••••••• • •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••....................-- ...••.••••.•.• N E:27•:::::1 9 9 0 ...................................................................................... A BACKGROUND. PROJECT, Leady Retail Bui'ding foot retail center The center will be subdivided to suit tenant requirements as space is leased, .............................................. lS$UE$ Aesthtics traffic, noise, light&glare, public service RECOMMENDATIONS That the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination of Nonsignificance Mitigated with conditions (see Page 2) • Environmental Review Commie , Staff Report • • .Leady Retail Building • June 27, 1990 • Page 2 Ep pmAl•: QATto TRANSPORTATION . 1.. That the applicant, in order to mitigate • transportation impacts, provide: a) a fair share contribution of $4426.00 toward the realignment and signalization of the Sunset Boulevard/Anacortes Avenue intersection; and b) restrict access to right in/right out only for the western most ingress/egress point for the • subject site. • (Note 1.a: The applicant may be called upon to • participate in the development of a cross- easement providing entry access from the subject site to the immediately abutting property • to the west and obtaining exit passage rights from the subject site via the Anacortes Avenue access on the immediately abutting property to the west. If such an easement is established, it is to be approved by the City Attorney and recorded prior to the issuance of site preparation/building permits.) AQUIFER PROTECTION 2. That the applicant, in order to mitigate impacts to the City's sole source aquifer, provide an agreement, in conjunction with site plan review, to submit to the City for approval of proposed specific uses, in order that the City may ascertain that such uses are suitable, or can be improved to be suitable, for development in Zone 2 of the APA. Uses and improvements are to be approved by the Planning Division, the Public • Works Department and the Fire Prevention Bureau. The agreement is to be valid for the life of the project, and is to be approved by the City Attorney in advance of the issuance of site • preparation/building permits. CONSTRUCTION 3. That the applicant provide a construction • mitigation plan including the following • components: a) an erosion control element; b) an element for wheel-washing of all construction vehicles prior to leaving the site; c) an element for watering down the site periodically to control dust and debris; d) an element for restriction of hauling routes and hours of hauling operations; and e) an element for signage of site and structures during construction to facilitate emergency service provision. These elements/plans are to be approved by the City prior to issuance of site preparation/ building permits. (Note 6.a.: The applicant shall ensure that the • construction mitigation plan is made a part of the contractor's agreements.) • In addition, staff recommend: . RECREATION 4. That the applicant, in order to mitigate recreation • impacts, be encouraged to make a voluntary contribution toward the development of public recreation facilities in the area which may be utilized by the center's employees and/or • • consumers. • • Environmental Review Comm Staff Report Leady Retail Building • June 27, 1990 Page 3 • (NOTE #1: At the time of site plan review and/or building permit review, staff will recommend conditions including, but not limited to: 1) extension of roof treatment to the east and west sides of the structure; 2) redesign of the parking area to reduce 53 provided spaces to 44 required spaces, including the elimination of the four parallel parking spaces, in order to ensure safe, effective circulation; 3) introduction of additional landscaping to provide a more visually pleasing environment; 4) development of an on-site exterior lighting plan to illuminate the site; 5) development of a thematically integrated signage plan; 6) development of storm drainage management systems; and 7) development'of utility service systems. (NOTE #2:At the time of building standard off-site improvements will be required for this development.) 1. Whether the applicant has adequately identified and addressed the following environmental impacts likely to occur in conjunction with the proposed development? a. Land Use/Aesthetics Impacts: Commercial development appears appropriate to the site, based upon. site characteristics (size, configuration, etc.) and based upon the fact that abutting properties are zoned for and primarily developed with commercial uses, or other uses which are . consistent with commercial development on this site. No substantive environmental impacts are identified. The proposed 10,500 square foot, one-story structure generally meets or exceeds Code standards as proposed or can be readily modified to do so -- for example, at the time of site plan review, staff will recommend the addition of roof treatment to the east and west sides of the structure to address aesthetic impacts. Recommendations will also be made to reduce the number of parking stalls from 53 to 44 to address Parking and Loading Ordinance requirements and to redesign parking to ensure safe, effective circulation. Additionally, recommendations will be made to utilize space now dedicated to parking to increased landscaping to provide a more visually pleasing environment. Finally, recommendations will be made to provide an on-site exterior lighting plan to illuminate the - site. Mitigation Measures: None required. Policy Nexus: Not applicable. b. Noise, Light and Glare Impacts: Activities on the subject property are anticipated to generate some sound, light and glare, based upon the number and type of commercial activities undertaken thereupon. No significant impacts are anticipated; levels of sound and light are expected to be similar to those generated by abutting commercial uses and adjacent Sunset Boulevard,which is a principal arterial. At the time of site plan review, staff will establish recommendations for design and location of parking areas to address occurring noise impacts, and for design/location of landscaping and lighting on the site, to mitigate light and glare impacts. Mitigation Measures: None required. Policy Nexus: Not applicable. c. Transportation • Impacts: The proposed commercial development is anticipated to generate approximately 427 ADWVTE onto Sunset Boulevard,'a heavily travelled roadway with mixed levels of service. The site is also proximate to the Sunset Boulevard/Anacortes Avenue intersection,which is scheduled for realignment and signalization to improve service levels in that area. Mitigation measures recommended for this development will include a traffic mitigation fee for a fair share of improvements to the Sunset Boulevard/Anacortes Avenue intersection, limited entry and exit points, and directional signage. Additionally,the applicant will be called upon to participate In the development of-a cross- easement providing entry/exit access for the subject site and for the immediately abutting property to the west via Anacortes Avenue. • c , Environmental Review Commii.,,,Staff Report Leady Retail Building June 27, 1990 Page 4 Mitigation Measures: Please see Recommendation #1. Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance, 4-6; Streets and Arterials Plan. d. Public Services Impacts: Staff from the Public Works Department, Fire Prevention Bureau and Police Department report that resources available are adequate to serve the site with standard improvements (e.g., utility lines, signage, and hydrants). • The site is in Zone 2 of the APA. As a result, in conjunction with site plan review, the City will establish a condition calling for the determination of suitable uses and the development of special improvements with specific uses, as necessary to protect the aquifer. Uses and improvements are to be approved by the Planning Division, the Public Works Department and/or the Fire Prevention Bureau. • The Parks and Recreation Department notes that the subject property is located within an area of Renton which is targeted as a priority area for public recreation improvements. A voluntary contribution toward these improvements is recommended. Mitigation Measures: See Recommendations #2, and #3 land #5. Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance, 4-6; Aquifer Protection Area; Comprehensive Parks Plan. e. Construction Impacts: Standard construction-related impacts are anticipated from the development of this site, including noise, dust, debris and traffic. Thus, standard mitigation elements are determined to be sufficient to address these impacts. Mitigation Measures: See Recommendation #4. Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance, 4-6. • ENT:&: F.O R EV I EW I�::::::;:;:::;<:>:<::>: . ............... ... G DEPARTMENT � s d artm nt .hav .r viewed. d comment t ........................... .:................:...:.:.::.....:..... • • Er•v;:.:>;:;:;;;.::: Rent• < > « <> <'< <<< < . . ..............................::::.:::. •e al R ••v•:•••• <:;: • June 27, 1990 • To: Larry Springer, Planning Manager Mayor's Administrative Assistant Lynn Guttmann, Public Works Director Ron Nelson, Building Official Glen Gordon, Fire Marshall From: Don Erickson, Secretary e n D <:«9.::;�>:•.��:::::.�:::. June 27, 199Q ... .. :.......................................................................................................................................... rc,V l:: o )01,er::n::::e .;:.:;pGatipn...... :;:;:;::;>::;:•>: Thl►'d Floor CpOter�nce;Room.»>:»:•>:::::<:.:�<:<:::;:�»>:>:•;;:�•>:. <.:;.>:::>:�::: ;;;;:;:.::.;;::;:<.:: Agenda attached below. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA JUNE•27, 1990 Third Floor Conference Room Commencing at 10:00 AM TIME/KEY PARTICIPANTS NEW LEADY RETAIL BUILDING ECF;SA=049-90 Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 10,500 square foot retail center. The center will be subdivided to suit tenant requirements as space is leased. RECONSIDERATION ARBY'S ROAST BEEF SA;V-020-90 Application for site plan approval to allow for a parking lot rearrangement and for a new drive through window, and variance application to allow five (5) feet of landscaping along Rainier Avenue instead of ten (10) feet in order to accommodate revised vehicular circulation. KENSINGTON APARTMENT HOMES ECF;SA-043-90 Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 24 unit apartment complex, to be located on a vacant parcel of approximately one (1) acre, which is zoned R-3, medium density multi-family residential use. . .. ..........:::::::.:::: • .. ....... ........................................................ . •• .••••••••••••••..•••••••••••••••••••••••••••• -4. 1 "••••••:':'::::::':'•••••'' •••• •••• TME.......;:.:.?...•.:.:::•:::::::::::::::•; :h.... : K:::•*•••:::::•::•:..::::::...:*•:::: • ..,. ••••. DEVELOPMENT•••:.-.i:::•:•:•:•••••••:::::::::,':', . ......'...:' .... •••,''''''..-tWiC... ... ............:.::::::::::::::::::::•:* :: ::':::.:?:*...*:':*::::.:::::::: :::.*: *::::::::::*,•••.:::..:•.::: ::::.::::::: .....,. .. .• . . • • • • - • .' • .••••••• • -•••• ••• ;* ' .....:-.%•..........::.:...COMMUNITY.•••••• ............,..........,........,............„........... ..........".............,............ ".....:..•••.-::":::::::::.:2:••••::::::',......it.i..:::::::::::•••;:: :::::.:-._Z.'...zL-;••' '''.;./.:. :•ENVIRONMENTAL•• ••..:••••••••EbeiRT::::::::::a•e.:•.•a:::.:::::::: :::::::........n•ii.:... ....:::•••g:..... ..gi....ii.:iii.e..:. :••...:• •.•::::::::••••.: :::•• :. • •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••1•••••.::•• D..........::-:Tvii. . .. EE ctAFPRA-7.1-...... : ::.:miii:ii.::::: igitmiig.: ::: : :::::::::::ftirsi::..,•,::::: :.a.:::::::?:?:i.:: :::?..: :: 1,.....::::::::::::::::::::::::::... ....iim::::::.••••.....:::::: :.:::::: : ::.:s.iii:•:•••:: :::.....:i.......:ii...a.:.::::•::•:•:...?:: ::::::::m.ai :•,.f....:...........:::: : :•••• ••4::::•:,...::: :: ::::::.•?-.........:: ::•:.... .........q:•:: •g: :::::: :::: :::::::::::::.•••.....*::::•::::-:?:*•..:•:::::•::::::::.,.••••••••••••••• •••,...............:::::::::::::•:•::•:mi : ::-:::: :::::: ::*a...•:•?••••••••.:ni::::::: ::.:.• : :::: : :: :::: :::: ::.:1111 .•.•••........••••••••••••.....•............•..•.•.•......•...•....•••..„.•.............•••••••..••.•.•...„.••••••••••••.• """........„:•...:•:•...........:....„.........................•.............,....•......••................................................... ...„............„.. . ' ........'...---..........................."...................."..--•••••••••'••••••••••:.............-.....................,.................:.... UND ............................„.......„...............„....,::::::::::v.*iiiio:::::::::. :.......:::::.:........ ..0.• :...::::::::ai:A....:Ei:::im:::...... ....a:::: :::a::. ...n::::::•:: :::::: :::... ...:.... .?..:•.:: ::.::::: : :. h)i •• •-•••••••••••••.BAOKO...........:......::::.:.:.....::::::.::.•••:::::u:::.:: :::::•••.:.m:?::.X....:..........),::::::•a:?: .FrikeitihOrii*:•:•:.:.::: ::::::::::::.m::::i... ?:•:::::::::::::::::]:imi.:::•:•::::::..::.z:::::: ::: :::::::::::i... ..]:•: ::::*ili. -,.....•.:::::.•:.:....s.........2.....iib.,:•..-ApPW9!.,N...i....ii..... ... .....m....:::.,::::::::•::::::::::::::: :Ii.:::::g::::::::::::WMN:::::•::t6ki :RPIT,....i.,....:....w:::: :: : :••••..M.S•ini ::::::.:::::::•:::•::::::*..•••••• •:::::::: : :: : :.,.%: ::: :......:: :::•:.:::::•::::::':' dy '•::::::::.::::::::::::::tii.i....:: g::::::::.q...:::.igiiii.i:.i:•••••:. :Q::::•0'...i:•:q••••••.!ifiii.•%:: :::: ::::R: irss....i:....0...•..1..::•.k.............A4:1::•i.iis...:f:.•:::::::::::::::::•.*:••?:::: :g•••••:.::::NM. ::R::::::•:.No.g:: :.••• •••••••••:•::::::::::::::•:-:••••••••••••••:::•;••.........,:„...::::::::::....m, :........:::.:.x....:::::::::...:0ii6JEpli:•va:•..............,...... ...........: :::::::::::::::::::::.::: :.:ME ....:::::1: ::.c.:?:::.:(,.: g::••6•A::4)40•0•.0.•••::. iiiii :::::•:•::?:••••••••••::::•:':**:.: •••,:.:...::::::::::.::::::::::::::::ii:::::.::::::: :•::::iaos064tgij . iiiii?.:1"6h..............6.::.00?,...11:.i.f.g.r::q::...1.: .: :::....::::?,............::::,. .su!....,i:i subdivided.: Q.:.-......./„:: ::::::::::::: ::::-. ...,............ .tNV)(10.N.Mg..................,............................r....... . ..... ,. A .:::..........................„.,................................:....::::........„.,....... ...::::::...b........o.i:.„.060 . :.4::61:1:.:::::*...4..:•.;:i.1%.:.Iii #01! 1111Z::efil5:t....;F-5:.:iltcifitlT........:k:i..110:.1...::rlir....ii!..e::::! ::•$...1::::sp:::!::.!0.:!.....!;1.......H ..i.1::::.:.!.:::i:::.1.i.:::...:i:....:::.i......1.•!..:::•:.:•::.:•:::::::::::::::::1:,..!..:.::' Building 16Ot::..Teei....................... ...................................::::::::.::::::::Mb:E..$6111P31.!9:::::.:::::.::::::: :::.g .::::.::::::0: :::Mi::::::%:.::::: :::.:::::::::::::isiti'4.(ftii.t...0.7.?..9.,.::::::::.:::::::.:.:•:.:.:*.--—......,.......:....:.:::::::::::::]:.::::::::%::.M .::Z:::: : :::•:::::W:Mili "::::::.::::•:-.':::::::::: :::::;:::::;.::n:.?:. :::::::: ::: :::::::::::::::•:•:':' ..................::::„......................::: :m .. ..4. 48.....$:14.1.-...). .e....................................::::::.:.:.:.:.......... •::***•:::::...-.:?::::::•::::::::::::::LOH:C'...:44:.1:....I.O...N.;::::(:)....::.E:::.::.::::PH:.:::.R: P:::::::::.::•9:.:......... .::i::::.:?.ai:.::.::.::::::::::.:................... .. 0..::.r;.:.t;1s::.;:!.:...:::..::! ::.:......::..:.:..:::):.:...::.*1:..i,3u:..j.:>."•...•l.:..):.::...:::..,........i:!7:!!F! :....::..::.::,i.:,•, ....•.........:.::.::::::::::::.....:*•0:.:::::: : :::L.......e.-...g::...tte..1Q.k.:..:.:.....:....:.:.:.....:..... ...... .... . . ......-...-....-..::::::-.:.:::::::,: i.::::: ::: :•:.:::...,::::ia::Ae.s.t!..)9....!.c....:!.........:::::.:::::.:.:-............................:......................i::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.:68h)....ropp9........:::i.7 : •riNi,,:::.: . .•• •••••••••••••:........,.:::::.:i::::::::::.:.::::::::::::.i:::::::Q:::::::::::::::::::::::•:::::::::',i.::::.::-..:.:.:.::::::::.:•::::.:::::::::.::::..:....,::.;..,::::.:4giReyi.P.M.:::.......:::,:.::::::::. :.............................:::::::::::ii.:i.:::1:i...gi6iiiiliiii:iiiiiii.. .......1.,.::::::.Ni".:::::;........ . :::.:::-:::......,.........:::.:.....,:..-:.:.:...........:....,....::::.::::::::::.:......:.::::ff.....,•ii,6yitiier1.....:::::.::....:::....:::::::::.:.:.:::.:•6ii:i::......::::.:.:K/I.jir0q14; :?ii :::: ::.:.:.•:::::ili :-.........,... ... .:: ,fhtsitiki:........,:py..........................:::::.................: No iiSidhitiqp. ::...:...:••:::::.::::::mi..,:::..:::::.m.f..:-..:::•::::...i.:::.: ::::..::...*!T .......-:.:.:•.:•:••:''..::::::::::,:::::::::::e':.::.::*"......:"'''''::::.:-..........:Ai,i's:• ::::A:: :::::.:::::::: &:?.sis.:::•:: '0:—••:'::•:fibK::::::::Oki::: •••••••••••••••••• ••••- • ••••••••••••••••••:•:•Ki•••hATI,, ,,,:::::.••• ••••••:::: :: •:::::•.:.::::::•••••:: :tet•ermip ........::•:::::":::.::,"-::::•••••••••••••••••2)::::•••••••••••:•••:::. • • •:::.::.::.::::::::••.............,•••• •• • . • • rniVINIEuii-,.........-.:.:,..,•:::: :::::.:,...:::::::•::::*::::: :: ::::,:::::•:::::::•....i....,.::::::::..........;:::..............::,(see::RagP.............:.:::::::.:-:.h.......:.:...- .. . .......::-..x.s.h•-•••••••...REL----...........:.:.:..:::.:•::::::.:'''.•"•-••::•••• •• . • • conditions .....:..............::,............ 1 , • , 1 • .• .\ • , ru\g•T • • r----- -,_.•,) , „ , 0: --* AlLXC Wfl I •LiJr-r-'''r--. . Y 1-.. .. •. ' . ... , . . . )z--- • ' irT....i,,,,i_:-.,:ror-A:".; .,/,..,/,, i 1 -.0 1.. .L I. . I • 0 q\. . 0 IIIIIIIIIIIIIII/11111 _. .• -Ns i • D2 /x„, .,/ . ., ."_________ ...... . I 1 i t,.'s . .. •% •I'\ , - II I / 1 1 1;)\--::\,. .0."°77::'7.-rr LY w'71-1`' 6 P.r-.ri ,..,LeiririCk 1 ' ,-'-• • ( . \ 1\ , j,(2* .- 41° • . -. ' , • IDI r _. '-el` • --' • ____ ........_ 111 • ., „...____-- • ,. ..,, - ,---. . _\,,,,\I„...... . ----'::____. •• (----.---:-.. . ., •-e.x1•5Tv-,.. —.),.. _,7,_ .,....e -1_,-- •t-11- 17.- • - - ,<. 1- • '...':•: „•_Ki51-11-k..--1 • • • ....;,--;-- ..•••--- .....„...,......:;.• • ,L, ,..---,..L.----:-.--1,_•„---' ,_.;21. . I ,.. - • ' •-- -‹ ' • I 2-s. • ........„.„....- ______..ae,....-\r' I /• (-.- Ai • \S .-1. ---- .....::. ....-:::•'...i. ;,..-. or' • t-?-1 1---14-c `,),,_ -- • . _ . . o„ , • • . , . •,___—•• 7 i . , • . . .--• , • . ' __..- g-') .pr-r-le•-• .. 1 I -- . _ ... __----- _--- ------- . •______--- • 'Environmental Review Commi ee Staff Report Leady_Retail Building , June 25, 1990 Page 2 C RECOMMENDATIONS R:E :O:IVI fVl EN.../�:.. Q TRANSPORTATION 1. That the applicant, in order to mitigate _ transportation impacts, provide: a) a fair share contribution of $4426.00 toward the realignment and signalization of the Sunset Boulevard/Anacortes Avenue intersection; and b) restrict access to right in/right out only for the western most ingress/egress point for the subject site. . (Note 1.a: The applicant may be called upon to participate in the development of a cross- easement providing entry access from the subject site to the immediately abutting property to the west and obtaining exit passage rights from the subject site via the Anacortes Avenue • access on the immediately abutting property to • the west. If such an easement is established, it is to be approved by the City Attorney and recorded prior to the issuance of site preparation/building permits.) AQUIFER PROTECTION 2. That the applicant, in order to mitigate impacts to the City's sole source aquifer, provide an agreement, in conjunction with site plan review, to submit to the City for approval of proposed specific uses, in order that the City may ascertain that such uses are suitable, or can be improved to be suitable, for development in Zone 2 of the • • APA. Uses and improvements are to be approved by the Planning Division, the Public Works Department and the Fire Prevention Bureau. The agreement is to be valid for the life of the project, and is to be approved by the City Attorney in advance of the issuance of site preparation/building permits. CONSTRUCTION 3. That the _applicant provide a construction mitigation plan including the following components: a) an erosion control element; b) an element for wheel-washing of all construction vehicles prior to leaving the site; c) an element for watering down the site periodically to control dust and debris; d) an element for restriction of hauling routes and hours of hauling operations; and e) an element for signage of site and structures during construction to facilitate • emergency service ,provision. These elements/plans are to be approved by the City prior to issuance of site preparation/ building permits. In addition, staff recommend: RECREATION 4. That the applicant, in order to mitigate recreation impacts, be encouraged to make a voluntary contribution toward the development of public recreation facilities in the area which may be utilized by the center's employees and/or consumers. (NOTE: At the time of site plan review, staff will recommend conditions including, but not limited to: 1) extension of roof treatment to the east and west sides of the structure; 2) redesign of the parking area to reduce 53 provided spaces to 44 required spaces, including the elimination of the four parallel parking spaces, in order to ensure safe, effective circulation; 4) introduction of additional landscaping to provide a more visually pleasing environment; 5) development of an on-site exterior lighting plan to illuminate the site; and 6) development of a thematically integrated signage plan. ' Environmental Review Commi de Staff Report Leady Retail Building June 25, 1990 • Page 3 1. Whether the applicant has adequately identified and addressed the following environmental impacts likely to occur in conjunction with the proposed development? • a. Land Use/Aesthetics Impacts: Commercial development appears appropriate to the site, based upon site characteristics (size, configuration, etc.) and based upon the fact that abutting properties are zoned for and primarily developed with commercial uses, or other uses which are consistent with commercial development on this site. No substantive environmental impacts are identified. The proposed 10,500 square foot, one-story structure generally meets or exceeds Code standards as proposed or can be readily modified to do so -- for example, at the time of site plan review, staff will recommend the addition of roof treatment to the east and west sides of the structure to address aesthetic impacts. Recommendations will also be made to reduce the number Of parking stalls from 53 to 44 to address Parking and Loading Ordinance requirements and to redesign parking to ensure safe, effective circulation. Additionally, recommendations will be made to utilize space now dedicated to parking to increased landscaping to provide a more visually pleasing environment. Finally, recommendations will be made to provide an on-site exterior lighting plan to illuminate the site. Mitigation Measures: None required. Policy Nexus: Not applicable. b. Noise, Light and Glare Impacts: Activities oh the subject property are anticipated to generate some sound, light and glare, based upon the number and type of commercial activities undertaken thereupon. No significant impacts are anticipated; levels of sound and light are expected to be similar to those generated by abutting commercial uses and adjacent Sunset Boulevard, which is a principal arterial. At the time of site plan review, staff will establish recommendations for design and location of parking areas to address occurring noise impacts, and for design/location of landscaping and lighting on the site,to mitigate light and glare impacts. Mitigation Measures: None required. Policy Nexus: Not applicable. c. Transportation • Impacts: The proposed commercial development is anticipated to generate approximately 427 ADWVTE onto Sunset Boulevard, a heavily travelled roadway with mixed levels of service. The site is also proximate to the Sunset Boulevard/Anacortes Avenue intersection, which is scheduled for realignment and signalization to improve service levels in that area. Mitigation measures recommended for this development will include a traffic mitigation fee for a fair share of improvements to the Sunset Boulevard/Anacortes Avenue intersection, limited entry and exit points, and directional signage. Additionally, the applicant will be called upon to participate in the development of a cross- easement providing entry/exit access for the subject site and for the immediately abutting property to the west via Anacortes Avenue. Mitigation Measures: Please see'Recommendation #1. Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance, 4-6; Streets and Arterials Plan. d. Public Services Impacts: Staff from the Public Works Department, Fire Prevention Bureau and Police Department report that resources available are adequate to serve the site with standard improvements (e.g., utility lines, signage, and hydrants). 'Environmental Review Commi l0 Staff Report • Leady Retail Building June 25, 1990 Page 4 The site is in Zone 2 of the APA. As a result, in conjunction with site plan review, the City will establish a condition calling for the determination of suitable uses and the development of special 'improvements with specific uses, as necessary to protect the aquifer. Uses and improvements are to be approved by the Planning Division, the Public Works Department and/or the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Parks and Recreation Department notes that the subject property is located within an area of Renton which is targeted as a priority area for public recreation improvements. A voluntary contribution toward these improvements is recommended. Mitigation Measures: See Recommendations#2, and #3 land #5. Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance, 4-6; Aquifer Protection Area; Comprehensive Parks Plan. e. Construction • Impacts: Standard construction-related impacts are anticipated from the development of this site, including noise, dust, debris and traffic. Thus, standard mitigation elements are determined to be sufficient to address these impacts. Mitigation Measures: See Recommendation #4. Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance, 4-6. • • • • • • • • RENr COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT RTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF- 049-90 APPLICATION NO (S) . : SA 049-90 PROPONENT: Ned Nelson PROJECT TITLE: Leady Retail Building BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 10 , 500 square foot retail center. The center will be subdivided to suit tenant requirements as space is leased. LOCATION: 4546 Sunset . Boulevard TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION 'BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P.M. ON MAY 24 , 1990 . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: (-c7L ICE-(� ' APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED p gCC -L i Tu rf ' L Lv1 SAI,oub "Be �Onrr�Nub c�, Y eA sr- i weS r I bES cq ^1")-k-E $v LD(U (E�r-n L-et,..5 c.,r71A) E D I Des l u_ 13 UI 6 2, c !� fry -P✓g�� kc�cv ( AST ��,R,2� Taus!bg' ,-4—. ti L.Q cAs �-� S 1( ? IS C-0r s 1 s-ter c,pc o ace. cc S ro2� '�Tcd1\.1-cs .. i L-p se- k 1�Pf�T D4= p SI 1PLAA) Sr 9w A- PA12— SelzV Li° I 11 15 P- �U cA.e-L_ GO/ Ste ' � /-6at nAPLo-1 PArrEALho serwtut ti -Y re-ea T7- 6q,� � S-7 . � �.�-- DATE 70 SIGNAT O D RECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE / REV. 9/88 - REN_ JN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DL_'ARTMENT `',: ''s: ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET .:{,. ),,, REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: a� 6), �. ' DATE CIRCULATED: May 10 , 1990 COMMENTS DUE:_May 24 , 1990 ``. ECF 049-90 • APPLICATION NO (S) : SA 049-90 PROPONENT: Ned Nelson PROJECT TITLE: Leady Retail Bldq. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 10 , 50( square foot retail center . The center will be subdivided to suit tenant requirements as space is leased. LOCATION: 4546 Sunset Boulevard SITE AREA 37 , 500 sq. ft. BUILDING AREA (gross) : 10 , 500 sq ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1 . Earth 0 0 ° O 0 0 2 ; Air 0 0 0 o 0 0 , 3 . Water 0 0 0 O ° ° 4 . Plants ° ° ° o ° O 5 . Animals ° 6 . Energy & Natural Resources ° ° ° o ° ° 7 . Environmental Health ° 0 0 O ° ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use 0 0 0 o ° O 9 . Housing ° ° o ° ° 10 . Aesthetics 0 0 0 o ° O 11 . i Light & Glare 0 0 ° ° ° o O 0 0 12 . Recreation O 0 0 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° 0 0 O 0 0 14 . ! Transportation 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 . Public Services 00 O 0 0 16 . Utilities 0 0 s, COMMENTS : 17L I,z(9 et,"� w\LI - ADD q-1). � T V c.o,Ji ttv 2_ to-,A Lto a' -X4/0 /4 g- 17 0 r b e--1--n o -_, •--sy_5„, 6 o - 13 L.117)• 7��. 'h9 (Ze-P<1-1(9N Ar gyp,Lori S SP-co w 3 e 1-ze3r1-4 a, Mort ru 734-e- 41 rc-7- P Tte-t-- E.J et-�i v`9 u . f '1.T St-tGLk.D [-cs t-o B(}re' `-() W CW- 11 o.J I i,.`Pfzr'`-t'—cg,,T S . I Weihave reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas i which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or area where additiona information is needed to properly. assess this proposal . ( S/Zz, io , Signature o irector or Authorized Representative Date Rev. 6/88 REND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT D RTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF- 049-90 APPLICATION NO (S) . : SA 049-90 RECEIVED PROPONENT: Ned Nelson MAY 1 1 1990 PROJECT TITLE: Leady Retail Building :RECEIVED BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 10 , 500 square foot retail center. The center will be subdivided to suit tenant requirements as space is leased. LOCATION: 4546 Sunset Boulevard TO : PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE _ • PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN . WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON MAY 24 , 1990 . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: ry L S l �� APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED • DATE 3- ^c-g t'- %2 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. ,'6/88 REN1UN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Dhl'ARTMENT - ,;,`� ;::• ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ;; ,.., :. .,. ,,, „„ REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Pe_ud,, .. .. .. ., - :;::::,.n DATE CIRCULATED : May 10 , 1990 COMMENTS 'DUE:-May 24 , 1990 ECF 049-90 r --77tr-_ .-.._.u.y,.Y.�. � , APPLICATION NO (S) : SA 049-90 11 RECEIVE" I PROIPONENT: Ned Nelson 'i WY 1 1 1990 k h I PROJECT TITLE: Leady Retail Bldg. I1 k-,,y14K{5 2 ?EGrtEkT1ON }, BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: ' Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 10 , 50Y square foot retail center . The center will be subdivided to suit tenant requirements as space is leased. LOCATION: 4546 Sunset Boulevard SITjE AREA _37 , 500 sq. ft. BUILDING AREA (gross) : 10 , 500 sq ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT • NECESSARY 1 . Earth 0 0 0 • 0 0 0 Y. . .2 . Air 0 0 0 O 0 0 3 . . Water 0 0 ° 0 0 . 0 4 . ' Plants 0 0 0 • 0 0 0 5 . Animals . 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 . Energy & Natural Resources ' 0 0 0 1 7 . ! Environmental Health 0 0 0 0 , 8 . Land & Shoreline Use. 00 O 0 0 9 . ' Housing ° . ° ° o ° ° 10 . Aesthetics 0 0 O 0 0 11 . Light & Glare 0 ° ° ° • ° ° 12 . Recreation ° ° • o ° ° • 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ' 0 • 0 0 14 ., Transportation o ° ° 15 . Public Services 0 ° 0 0 0 • 16 . Utilities 0 0 0 f COMMENTS . ��/�..?-- ? - :./ ' J . , . ' • . /":/ . . ( f;J¢ 2;r, - ?'�'� tJc-• ..J...'-/,-. ✓ : . e/ .'r \jjk.( %J/ .., / "<•,--:..1` -:'.L:--c.V/-1f !. .r o-C.� " • .e- • ' • "-..- • -G>_• ;<,,.,,.-r .,_ ,,• We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas i which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or ares where ad 'itional inff000rrmat ' on is needed to properly assess this proposal . ,Si ature of Director r Authorized Representative . Date Rev.. 6/88 . 1 1 REN - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT t, " 1..RTMENT DEVELOPMENT 'APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF- 049-90 APPLICATION NO (S) . : SA 049-90 PROPONENT: Ned Nelson PROJECT TITLE: Leady Retail Building BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant • seeks site plan approval for a 10 , 500 square foot retail center. The center will be subdivided to suit tenant requirements as space is leased. LOCATION: 4546 Sunset Boulevard TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: . UTILITIES ENG.; DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION • PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE • PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS 'REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN - WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P.M. ON MAY 24 , 1990 .' • REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED t-' APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS - NOT APPROVED i+ /, � ?vim/ •/V'•l-!..�./✓J %L- • • p /lJ ii DATE • h SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR• AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. ;6/88 • RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DL "IRTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: � 7 p_ ✓.� DATE CIRCULATED: May 10 , 1990 COMMENTS DUE: May 24 , 1990 ECF 049-90 APPLICATION NO (S) : SA 049-90 • PROPONENT: . Ned Nelson PROJECT TITLE: Leady Retail Bldg. ' 1 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF, PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 10 , 50 square foot retail center. The center will be subdivided to suit tenant requirements as space is leased. LOCATION: 4546 Sunset Boulevard SITE AREA 37 , 500 sq. ft. BUILDING AREA (gross) : 10 , 500 sq ft. IMPIACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1 . Earth 0 0 0 O 0 0 2 . I Air 0 t/ 0 0 0 0 0 3 . Water ° 0 0 O 0 0 4 . : Plants 0 ° 0 O 0 0 5 . Animals 0 0 0 O 0 0 6 . , Energy & Natural Resources 0 0 0j - O 0 0 7 . Environmental Health 0 00 O 0 0 8 . .Land & Shoreline Use o ✓ o o O 0 0 9 . Housing 0 0 ° O 0 0 10 . Aesthetics ° O 0 0 11 . Light & Glare 0 ✓ ° O 0 0 12 . Recreation 0 0 0 O 0 0 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° O 0 0 14 . • Transportation V.� ° O 0 0 15 . Public Services 0 ✓ 0 0 O 0 0 16 . Utilities 0C_./ 0 ° COMMENTS : J C L:3 C_ C--(s-c,- CJUs-,,,, a- r(\--s'-4 -4 " cpkjr,_. \-,IZZ.i.,-1 \,_,, eu,.,.,_ „t.„-___L__. „,_ L_ Cb 0.*-- Li._, I (,9_4,. .u.a..,, �y ; ca � LLAm-, % 4_--__- - ‘\-- \f)k-g_ --6 k•--3\ - l c ��-l� 6,c).., ) . pitzvx9„6 -, ci -vd\c:,, )* y q,_,) ,0QJ ,Q43-6—es: cdv._., 1-6 CT__Q_SL- ,( 2j)---N2_,Ic. We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas is which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or area, where additional infor ation is needed to properly assess this roposal . Signature of Directow'of Authorized Representative Date ' "" , , . Rev. 6/88 1 REN7 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT D RTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF- 049-90 APPLICATION Nb (S) . : SA 049-90 PROPONENT: Ned Nelson PROJECT TITLE: Leady Retail. Building BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 10 , 500 square foot retail center. The center will be subdivided to suit tenant requirements as space is leased. LOCATION: 4546 Sunset Boulevard TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT . • COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT 'OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON MAY 24 , 1990 . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT DIVISION: V APPROVED APPROVED .WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED • • . • DATE • `: SIGNATURE-'OF 'DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. :"S/88- RENI..:N COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Di URTMENT • ' ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 61- -;-gS, DATE CIRCULATED : May 10 , 1990 OMMENTS DUE: 24 1990 ECF 049-90 . . .- ' / [I ) L� C LS O U 1990 APPLICATION NO (S) : SA 049-90 '': ' — i /ft MAY 'i' PROPONENT: Ned Nelson • O PROJECT TITLE: Leady Retail Bldq. i+ •BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for_aJ10 , 5C square foot retail center. The center will be subdivided to suit tenant requirements as space is leased. LOCATION: 4546 Sunset Boulevard . SITE AREA 37 , 500 sq. ft. BUILDING AREA (gross) : 10 , 500 sq ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1 . Earth 0 0 ° o 0 0 2 . Air ° ° ° o O O 0 3 . Water 0 0 . O. 0 0 4 . Plants 0 0 0 O 0 0 5 . Animals 0 0 0 o 0 • 0 6 . Energy & Natural Resources ° o O O 7 . Environmental Health 0 0 o 0 0 8 . Land & Shoreline Use 00 o 0 0 9 . Housing ° ° ° o O ° , 10 Aesthetics 0 0 . O 0 0 111 Light & Glare ° O O 'O 12 .. Recreation 0 0 0 o 0 0 13 Historic & Cultural Preservation ° 0 0 o 0 0 • 14 . Transportation ° O O O • 15 : Public Services 00 0 O 0 0 16 . Utilities 00 CO ir ENTS : r , ;.. ;C; 'svtSK-.)N crc'- i?F RECs r .N MAY ! 4'WO O I • We have reviewed this application with particular attention to thos•e-areas which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are where additional information/is needed to properly ' assess this proposal . Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Rev. 6/88 RE-- N COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT` ARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET `_., REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: p SZ> DATE CIRCULATED : May 10 , 1990 COMMENTS DUE:_May 24 , 1990 .F';. ECF 049-90 APPLICATION NO (S) : SA 049-90 • PROPONENT: Ned Nelson PROJECT TITLE: Leady Retail Bldq. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 10 , 5( square foot retail center . The center will be subdivided to suit tenant requirements as space is leased . LOCATION: 4546 Sunset Boulevard SITE AREA 37 , 500 sq. ft. BUILDING AREA (gross) : 10 , 500 sq ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1 . Earth 0 0 ° o 0 0 2 . Air 0 0 ° o 0 0 3 . Water 0 0 ° o 0 0 4 . Plants 0 0 ° ° 0 0 5 . Animals 0 0 ° o ° 0 6 . Energy & Natural Resources ° 0 ° o ° ° 7 . Environmental Health 0 0 ° o 0 0 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° o 0 0 9 . Housing 0 0 ° o ° ° 10 . Aesthetics 0 0 0 o ° 0 11 . Light & Glare 0 0 ° ° ° ° 12 . Recreation 0 0 ° ° 0 0 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° 0 ° 0 0 0 14 . Transportation 0 0 ° o ° ° 15 . Public Services 0y ° ° ° ° 16 . Utilities 0 0 0 , COMMENTS : (10k-ak" a b -SU- (oLdL v-,24(wcytmu.4.-i-/)2 ki,v0 7 pgioz„,476 PlP-P S PLorc2-- - d, f\.5 c6P bor 6 L.0,2bvcf;? .ow 11., We have reviewed this applicat n th part ular atilention to those areas 3 which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or area where addi ' onal information is needed to properly assess this )p�rooposal . '() Signature of Dire or o uthorized Representative Date Rev. 6/88 RENTOIv COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPr._ZTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ' ECF- 049-90 APPLICATION NO (S) . : SA 049-90 PROPONENT: Ned Nelson PROJECT TITLE: Leady Retail Building BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 10!, 500 square foot retail center. The center will be subdivided to suit tenant requirements as space is leased. LOCATION: 4546 Sunset Boulevard TO': PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON MAY 24 , 1990 . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS IZ NOT APPROVED P001/ AA, 67,, btkoStvAcu ff-ovvL 1.-0 (3. poozwo M(att_d _. 1 JLAiVL d3c63 o*Ld 6 /bc_, ( t/u tocco*}&- DATE aSZV SIGNATURE OF DIRECT OR A ORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. ::6/88 • REQUIRED FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS HAZARD IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION NAME: D)/ E7Q/,: /c�q, U.B.C. CLASS OF BUILD ADDRESS: // FIRE MGMT AREA DETERMINE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION - CLASS (CIRCLE ONE) : I - II IV III V RE-RESISTIVE NON-COMBUSTIBLE ORDINARY FRAME MIXED TOTE: IF MIXED, " SEE SPECIAL INSTRUCTION FOR AREA AND BASIC FIRE FLOW) DETERMINIE AREA: GROUND FLOOR AREA: FT2 NUMBER OF STORIES TOTAL BUILDING AREA: /D, ,;aD (A) DETERMINIE BASIC FIRE FLOW FROM TABLE -#1, USING AREA (A) : �1,'/SU GPM (B) DETERMINIE OCCUPANCY FACTOR ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: GPM (C) IF LOW HAZARD, SUBTRACT UP TO 25% OF (B) : IF HIGH HAZARD, ADD UP TO 25% of (B) COMPUTE ''SUB-TOTAL (B+C) : 7S U GPM (D) (IF B+C LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) DETERMINIE SPRINKLER ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: GPM (E) (IF COMPLETELY SPRINKLERED, SUBTRACT UP TO 50% OF (D) : IF LIGHT HAZARD OCCUPANCY AND FIRE RESISTIVE OR NON-COMBUSTIBLE CONSTRUCTION, SUBTRACT UP TO 75% OF (D) . DETERMINIE EXPOSURE ADJUSTMENT: USING THE TABLE AS A GUIDE, ENTER THE SEPARATION AND ADJUSTMENT FOR EACH OF THE "FOUR FACES" OF THE BUILDING IN THE TABLE AT THE RIGHT: SEPARATION MAX. ADJUSTMENT EXPOSURE SEPARATION ACT. ADJ. 0-10 25% MAX NORTH ADD Z' 6 % 11 ,-1 30 20% MAX EAST -/O ' ADD /6 % 31 - 60 15% MAX SOUTH / S U'-t- ADD 61 -' 100 10% MAX WEST ' ADD / 5 % 101 150 5% MAX TOTAL % OF ADJUSTMENT 150 or 4-Hr WALL 0% MAX (NOT TO EXCEED 75%) S 5 (TOTAL % ADJUSTMENT TIMES (D) ADJUSTMENT: -{— I S ) G 'GPM (F) DETERMINE ROOF AND SIDING COVERING ADJUSTMENT: (IF SHINGLE COVERING, ADD 500 GPM) ADJUSTMENT: GPM (G) . COMPUTE ESTIMATED FIRE FLOW REQUIRED: F D+E+F+G IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) _ F D+E+F+G IS GREATER THAN 12, 000 GPM, INSERT 12,000 GPM) '4/2 G s (D+E+F+G) REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: A,5-0 GPM (H) . SIGNED: / lr DATE: / /Uf /`/9a / • RAW COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT “RTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF- 049-90 APPLICATION NO (S) . : SA 049-90 PROPONENT: Ned Nelson PROJECT TITLE: • Leady Retail Building BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 10 , 500 square foot retail center. The center will be subdivided to suit tenant requirements as space is leased. LOCATION: 4546 Sunset Boulevard TO : PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: : ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE - LONG RANGE I PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON MAY 24 , 1990 . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: P-•GLX1'1tic APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED Any development and/or construction shall comply with current Fire and Building Codes .and Ordi- nances. A so-oorrd means of approved access is required. Fire Department access roads/lanes shall be paved minimum width 20'; minimum height 13' 6". Yes —No Preliminary fire flow calculations show a fire flow of 6-0 is required. '-/ hydrants with a minimum flow of gpm each is required. Primary hydrant is required to be within js° feet of the structure. Secondary hydrants are required to be within _ 360 feet of the structure. An approved automatic sprinkler system is required to protect the total structure. Yes No All fire department access roads are to be paved and installed prior to construction. Yes No _ All fire hydrants are required to be installed and approved prior to construction.. Yes No DATE 770.7 /O / 20 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. ',6 8 8 REN_ •N COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT D. ARTMENT . r{ ., RE DEPT. �:k �nf;� Pig ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET; 2PLF! NTIOff,;;ziJ A!!. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: �, V 1 0 "Kw .-+,'� DATE CIRCULATED: May 10 , 1990 COMMENTS DUE:_MaVr247�:..: 1:990:, �.y ,�; J L!2.... L- J__:1 �:^t bxs.^ipt./. • ECF 049-90_ -,:„!,3 APPLICATION NO (S) : SA 049-90 PROPONENT: Ned Nelson PROJECT TITLE: - Leady Retail Bldq. I BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 10 , 50 square foot retail center. The center will be subdivided to suit tenant requirements as space is leased . ' I LOCATION: 4546 Sunset Boulevard SITE AREA 37 , 500 sq. ft. BUILDING AREA (gross) : 10 , 500 sq ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION. . IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1 . 1 Earth ° ° ° o ° ° • 2 . Air 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 3 . Water 0 0 ° • ° 0 0 4 . Plants 00 ° 0 0 5 . . Animals 01 ° O 0 0 G. Energy & Natural Resources 0 ° O O 7 . Environmental Health - 0 ° o O O • 8 . Land & Shoreline Use 0 0 0 O 0 0 9 . ! Housing ° ° o ° ° 10 .' Aesthetics 0 0 ° O 0 • 0 11 .'i Light & Glare ° ° ° o ° ° 12 . Recreation O 0 0 13 ., Historic & Cultural Preservation ° 0 0 O 0 0 14 .' Transportation ° o ° • ° 15 . Public Services • 0 �° 0 O 0 0 16 .! Utilities . 0 0 ° COMMENTS : ' I We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas i which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or area where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal . /Of /%9G Signature of Director or Authorized Representative 'Jae,/ Rev. 6/8.8 REND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF- 049-90 APPLICATION NO (S) . : SA 049-90 PROPONENT: Ned Nelson PROJECT TITLE: Leady Retail Building BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 10 , 500 square foot retail center. The center will be subdivided to suit tenant requirements as space is leased. LOCATION: 4546 Sunset Boulevard TO : PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ' ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG" RANGE • PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVID1ED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON MAY 24 , 1990 . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: j-LofLy,,-\ (k)a APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS /NOT APPROVED Cq )cu.)af onj sAa/) the refu_ m itf4 ?L'or drq nq ( l� ��e C vglv� e_/( .ds OiSS �o,- �G� sI / �i dd� frva �l�Y�il�ro�7 �v, If b, f0) I I rv7.o1/11 f _1 1 I n1 i.2P ry I Ovs G.nd 1 (v o vJ a req /)f 1 ,6e s/jd4r„� q h� C� ICu 1��rors . I — A r? v i set{ I . E S.C. P What Is 110b/e ,b11( 1.t)0;ks �I?ti// bf Svbrned ( I ij4 ;r)� tr, 14YS S11�i � I �C. lip cl4/6d I(� V� N1�Lf C�tco-yes n .5'-O if M d 4 f �� ( 7. /G 5.�.. P, • • 62C . V e DATES-PO-0 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. -6./88 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENVIRON NTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: C�`��LO-P2L. ,. . DATE CIRCULATED : May 10 , 1990 COMMENTS DUE:_May 24 , 19'9,0 . EC 049-90 • APPLICATION NO (S) : SA 049-90 PROPONENT: Ned Nelson . . PROJECT TITLE: Leady Retail Bldq. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 10 , 5C square foot retail center . The center will be subdivided to suit tenant requirements as space is leased. LOCATION: 4546 Sunset Boulevard SITE AREA 37 , 500 sq. ft. BUILDING AREA (gross) : 10 , 500 sq ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1 . Earth ° o 0 0 • 2 . ' Air • 0 ° o 0 0 3 . ' Water • 00 o 0 • . 0 4 Plants 0 0 0 O . 0 0 '5 . Animals 00 O 0 0 6 . Energy & Natural Resources o ° ° 7 . . Environmental Health - ° ° o ° ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 . Housing ° ° ° o O ° . 10 .: Aesthetics 0 0 0 O 0 • 0 11 . Light &. Glare 0 0 ° o ° ° 12 . Recreation 0 0 0 0 0 ° 13 ., Historic & Cultural Preservation ° 0 0 O 0 0 14 .; Transportation 0 0 ° P 0 0 0 • 15 .; Public Services o ° ° 16 . Utilities 0 0 . COMMENTS : • • We 'have• reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas i which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or area where additional information is needed to properly' assess this proposal . -1\ '0'2-1 j'4'-' J114ze> 4 et] .,- Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date (-4,7 Rear. 6/88 I I • RENT4WOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT D TMENT . . DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET H ECF- 049-90 APPLICATION NO (S) . : SA 049-90 • • PROPONENT: • Ned Nelson PROJECT TITLE: Leady Retail 'Buildinq BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval . fo a 1.0', 500 'square foot retail center. The center will be subdivided toll suit tenant requirements as space is leased. LOCATION: 4546 Sunset Boulevard TO: • PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT • SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION • PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING -THIS APPLICATION SHOULD. BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE .COMMENTS 'TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE CO MMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5; 00 P .M. ON MAY 24 , 1990 .. . . • REVIEW IN DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT PPROVED ; e; ; / P 6 7 S X ExiTs--)1211 7';-; (- 7 / ? 4_ / ' ',:"2"• •- (21 C21,. • • ) _f DATE --=5-17- 4.--> • SIGNA URE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZ REPRESENTATIVE . REV. 6/88 /-‘• 1- \ -1 . , • / . A1)'•=) / ZO-OD • 7- • k. .REN'1. ,N COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Di ARTMENT 1 j '�,c�'oiy. .9cn /,s/ ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET �� 2 Doti K EY•22-GSM 9 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: C� � `�,,;��,,,-;. CIRCULATED : Ma• 10 , 1990 COMMENTS DUE: Ma 24 , 1990 DATE CIR V � DUE:_May ECF 049-90 ' APPLICATION NO (S) : SA 049-90 PROPONENT: Ned Nelson PROJECT TITLE: Leady Retail B1dq. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 10 , 50C square foot retail center. The center will be subdivided to suit tenant requirements as space is leased . LOCATION: 4546 Sunset Boulevard • SITE AREA 37 , 500 sq. ft. BUILDING AREA (gross) : 10 , 500 sq ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT � IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth � ° ° 0 0 0 2 . Air • ° O 0 ° 3 . Water ° O i 0 0 4 Plants, ° 5 . Animals 0 0 0 0 0 11I 6 . Energy & Natural Resources - 0 0 ° 0 0 0 7 . Environmental Health 0 O 0 0 I 8 . Land & Shoreline Use 0 0 9 . Housing 0 0 • 0 10 . Aesthetics • 0 0 0 11 . Light & Glare 0 0 0 .0 0 0 12 . Recreation 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 • 13 . Historic & • Cultural Preservation ° 00 O 0 0 I 14 . 1 Transportation 0 • • 0 0 0 15 . Public Services 0 /..„..------0 O O O • _ 16 . Utilities 0 �/~ 0 COMMENTS . - r • G jj =( %1 J 7 Y'' h-cI 't r - !' -:l- I r..:)C-r )' L -if: j - ▪ ' - 7,C.:' 7�i- :S•c._.0 ) �'3- 2. /c I j/ L,G-p `_• C2-/_- - 7,4.0 //7 . c•- Y _s c:_,.! /fl vj C^- � G a--->C-_'r J ' G�!-�� 2 A.f'� ,�'' c:�Y-/ -e-j / .ti- , L. 7.e>: 7• -, l�_:/•'�iA- ` G-i :'.- ---/,_.. - . i.// <)•. k /'L�..,l.-J I _ — j--- r ✓ •./ rI/ J( / 7 % 7Z ) " Fe • / 0. , _ J) C)O.AllLi Py/ 7../ 7 7 7= ,.7 , 4/9 53;_7 0 )Lici- . � We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal . 6;(7)1/2° ' Signature of Director Authorized Repre' n tive Da •/V Rev. 6/88 /,- ;- . - / .. - . 2 <L• / /"4.)' / _ /y ' / 2/, 7 - 'CZ).•#, il RE '' COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET jl 1. ECF- 049-90 APPLICATION NO (S) . : SA 049-90 it I' PROPONENT: Ned Nelson I; ii PROJECT TITLE: Leady Retail Building I. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval fOr a 10 , 500 square foot retail center . The center will be subdivided to suit tenant requirements as space is leased. !I i1 ' LOCATION: 4546 Sunset Boulevard TO : 1 I PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: 1 UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION I FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU I POLICE DEPARTMENT i 1 1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE _ LONG RANGE - PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT I OTHERS : 1 COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P.M. ON MAY 24 , 1990 . ; I Ii REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: ..7?-5-- S/r ' I APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 1,77.1;OT,iAPPROVED J ', ' '1 _C:IVAi2 )../ y///,/_ fi- A.21-?c,,) /7/(_-i.,_ , .u...).3c4.1.ii.,-:_fi. T /9,..,,..-,,./te,,,, A.6 ,/,. .__2.- ,‘..,,, -, __ ....•J.. .4. , i ,a,:, ./..•i ,•-> .1-: .,:.:.T� ;G/� °� siG-,-Wit.- ... 5 Gf /1 :._ e, Gam. J ,Gc -.(7.(1/:: t. ,t. ,...,/,,,,z.,. ,,,x,ef,,,,. 7)„,-.A.1,,,,,/-...„ .a., i ,,,,,,-,-.„6„ -:.,-(./. ,,,,,,,,/,„ - --6). ,,,,-,:-, .„.z..,,,,.,v,/,/7,(., 7//6=- , A p/2,,:i.,,..,: i ,„,/,,,,fi „0/./cct V..f•_e )2,6' ..c4-.6,--) -1. ./g oe'r(//1-i,fr(,1,-;--.-/1,-61 ....0/Lcd 1- 'dHst.ii-°`'lis'-i I ..., ,, .... / l C r c 6, ��`` ,. ,--,J,,-1 „ i 7/.(x-, 0y- 1 /7/27, ..,g. ,:,„._./.., /_,,,e'p. ,c,e,i k 71%-r) '4:4-/K L;c.),/ , .1 si i j , 9 i 61, i,!,, //,.y j 4.7.1z 1.4 `:�(` , 0 1;.,) 1 A i t �� 9- � � 'hP�c ��.� �'�', ' DATE �� /�Ci� �/ /�' SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORI REPRESENTATIVE t II REV.'- 6/88 � ,{', �� YY /rr 7 �-GL•:� .��1�_ ,l(��YZ(i' >vGG!/,r'V V .� iT l -l3-A-s. , -g47-1•-e-, (24 7 0 6.R.Q,11-C/ y� ,a/ 4 ,..G'.--„0-&, �-�102d -d_ ic 6 , 4l/ h.,.,,.__ ,aA REN'i,JN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DL._ARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW' SHEET REVIEWING' DEPARTMENT: S).0)-cit-e2r- (.-/-7 1,P-� ;'��. ' )',��„ DATE CIRCULATED: May 10 , 1990 COMMENTS 'DUE: May 2 4 , 19'9`0 . '4/// ECE 049-90 . I I APPLICATION NO (S) : SA 049-90 • PROPONENT: Ned Nelson ! • PROJECT TITLE: Leady Retail Bldg. I BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 10 , 50 square foot retail center . The center will be subdivided to suit tenant requirements as space is leased. LOCATION: 4546 Sunset Boulevard SITE AREA 37 , 500 sq. ft. BUILDING AREA (gross) : 10 , 500 sq ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT - IMPACT NECESSARY 1 . , Earth 0 0 0 O 0 0 2 . ; Air 0 0 0 o ° 0 I 3 . Water O 0 0 4 . Plants 0 °' , O 0 0 5 . Animals 0 0 0 O 0 0 6 . Energy & Natural Resources o ° ° 7 . 1 Environmental Health o ° ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use O 0 0 9 . Housing O 0 • 0 • 10 . ' Aesthetics 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 . 1 Light & Glare ° 12 . ' Recreation O 0 0 13 . i. Historic & Cultural Preservation ° 0 0 O 0 ° 14 . 1 Transportation 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 . I Public Services o / O O 16 . 1, Utilities 0 /_/ ° 1 �1 `CO ENT S . f� ,�� %/-��:'.�.��( � � �©, .� '�_ � I i7` / , • / / I, / d�CIL?c'�(: AIL 1 C kQ /Y .., , , .. 1, N l% ..,-i' Ci Q ;.`'�•Ci,,, ?x.Ji -ter Y•.�iy:;, 7,<✓ '/(''E l'`-;(Si� • 1 U/� J J • We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas IA which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or area: where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal . 1 1 I 'exl,,,--4 -/-7. .- . 4, r, Of ,/ . 2 Signature of DireCjor or Atrtlhorized Representative Date R . 6/88 i FEE APPLICATION: E:j DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION -REVIEW SHEET 171 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET 1 I PLAN REVIEW ROUTING SLIP I OTHER I I >L9 DATE: w . /.:> :=/,I • APPLICANT: .•-4 ,?-/-;, .. -:�,.c.LL' , _ . . . JOB ADDRESS: 4.5-4-t,I'' - 1- -1y . ,r3. .,,_ . lee . ' - NATURE OF WORK: !,EJ�!2.5. .- "G.zetz,J 1) I PROPERTY MANAGEMENT `/�1.A/ DATE RECEIVED Comments Due BY PROPERTY MGMT. Comments or suggestions regarding this application should be provided in writing. Please provide comments to the Comm: Dev. Dept. (C.D.D. ) by 5:00 p.m. on above date. I! REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION \-// .LC� �,/,�s��4--A.r�1;..,o�i . II '/ U IXIFEES APPLIED CANNOT APPLY FEES. (./ ❑ LEGAL DESCRIPTION / ` r�• NEED MORE INFORMATION El SQUARE FOOTAGE . . �-`I �, �1 1r 0,`2- ❑ FRONT FOOTAGE ❑ VICINITY MAP It is .the intent of this development fee analysis to put the developer/owner on notice, that the fees quoted below will apply to the subject site upon development of the property. All quoted fees are due and payable at the time the construction permit is issued to install the on-site and off-site improvements (i .e. underground utilities, street improvements, etc. ) PROJECT COST LATECOMER LATECOMER AGREEMENT - WATER NO PER. FTG. FEE II CITY HELD //V 3/3- .7//o. !9/ /.5-9 •PL, y-/. / H PRIVATE DEVELOPER HELD _o _ LATECOMERS AGREEMENT - SEWER !I CITY HELD 1'-PR-I-VATS-DEVELOPER-HELD- (5--230 'UD1� C '7='1 ,, D 1/- JS- SS C/7 y To CoLGEGT SPECIAL UTILITY CONNECTION CHARGE - WATER - UNITS • SUCC FEE Singlle family residential dwelling unit $300/lot x Apartlment, Condo, each multiplex unit $175/ea. unit x ., Commercial/Industrial $.04/sq. ft. of property x .32 9Fov% r/ S/;e . Ot• 4' 1 SPECIAL UTILITY CONNECTION CHARGE - SEWER Singlle family residential dwelling unit $300/lot x Apartment, condo, each multiplex unit $175/ea. unit x Commel-ci al/Industrial $.04/sq. ft. of property x 7.9ooL 7/ 3//t. co :z- i� SPECIIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT (hospital/Area) WATER UNITS SAD FEE DEVELOPMENTS WITH 1500 GPM FIRE FLOWS OR LESS: HArea Charge $0.034 per sq\ ft! x :IFrontage Charge $16.00 per/front ft. .x DEVELOPMENTS WITH GREATER THAN/15'00 GPM FIRE FLOWS: liArea Charge $0.048 per/Sq.ft. x iFrontage Charge $18.00 per front ft. x 0— I \ SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT (Honey Crk. Intercptr) - SEWER UNITS SAD FEE . AREA CHARGES: !!Residential dwelling units, apartments li or equivalents ; $250 per dwelling unit x !Commercial development: - il$.05 per sq.ft. of gross site area x 37.9ooL7 f-//. &-q6".'!;D FRONT'HFOOTAGE CHARGES: - 337. 19 per Front Ft. (on ea. side) x !;$74.38 per fr.ft..Cprpty .on both sides of imprv. ) x '4--.J(„6 ,/_ ,2,,, , sG•.... _Le-c--t- ,• . .��.t_j-,'-'-J`.''. 4„<..c:.(-Z. ram.,-L- • /�/ '"-TOTAL: $ 4.2, G /q ..% The above quoted fees do NOT include inspection fees, side sewer permits, r/w permit fees or the cost of water meters. li I I i_..J { L,:,_.L. �•'• . • /l-;.L1_T.!•'-Y- /S /C l f\ DATE , /J Signature of Director or Authorized Representative U .. 0 111 . . I =/ ay' , . �_� it REN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT D RTMENT it DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET • ECF- 049-90 APPLICATION NO (S) . : SA 049-90 PROPONENT: Ned Nelson ' f PROJECT TITLE: Leady Retail Building BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval fOr a 10 , 500 square foot retail center. The center will be subdivided t'6 suit tenant requirements as space is leased. LOCATION: 4546 Sunset Boulevard TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: 1 ,, UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION . SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE IFOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON MAY 24 , 1990 . Ii REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: ti\i ICR LITICIN E 6I1.1 E :rz;, C Der. APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS X NOT APPROVED �ThE P R E li t� t o.'i (+R E F um -De Nsi 0 O F -C IT E t�y.'��cOcsec DE\JEloPt-lt>vT 4, 2 7G C-PM) CEIns E ci(2E SLIP?l�y' C� 3)3 S5 GPM) — RG'CoNhND ALE p '& �- CGUST4�Lma� FCe-oloo CDe- U)Ep 'v-t) REOcICE `fkE- FCo1\) 7%r1r+�0 "1V 111: ssc fr1 AdA1l.Ac3iLiT i O Q. 111 cR(r1St The PcaPoe D luMY:1-1lP10,1 1-OOP 61.1 LOT 2 Gc 'knell- PIAr . A F i 2 e FAGi-L) I c H As' C3 e. l.0 i {t.f o . A00i-F1 a 4\-st 2P11-115 f12E LCC��i11FQ C MoarN - f:01, Eling.y' ),G(L (-PH GF fiY14"cow DEPIANf. /tl(�G11fC�'\c S Q(� �S\C CCiC S(S'i rt � i S R•E'CAC,i?El) Pell } ��.,"i`c�i F.i1-t.�� 9 E . . 9 ) !: 5U13 1i1l ;tPA12F�CE ��_,i'\cYL .r'. \rSJ 11' ��C'-GV -rlerc`C LA-LI tr y PL 2ftVTc'-)./ 11{,{, ' Y r 11II 1 S-TNNo rte'DS E12.'3 ;;F Ci 1 (S l Ti!.i"C";r`s _ I 51.1�j�CT -ch JG oc)1Eu� FFe-S 2E11. i-y1. l\-cYtFh FrE "c vcE(A.) ,S EI • • • 4c13-5;c7u.L, Z--7 oucz---- 235-263 I DATE .5/ 161/ cio SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV: ,_ 6I/88 REN1.1.J.N COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT D.b-:.A.RTMENT -,... . ' ,• ...,,, . .. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET . . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: DATE CIRCULATED : May 10 , 1990 COMMENTS DUE: May 24 , 1990° , EC F 049-90 _ ..),..t.p I) APPLICATION NO (S) : SA 049-90 ' EA. '"- MAY 1 4 19u PROPONENT: Ned Nelson UF REN i ON PROJECT TITLE: Leady Retail Bldq. PUBLIC WORKS CUS1 OiviLk SENVIL;ES BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 10 , 5( square foot retail center . The center will be subdivided to suit tenant requirements as space is leased . : LOCATION: 4546 Sunset Boulevard I I SITE AREA 37 , 500 sq. ft. BUILDING AREA (gross) : _ 10 , 500 .sq ft . 1 IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE ' MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1 . Earth 0 0 • 0 0 0 2 . Air 0 0 . . 0 0 0 3 . • Water 0 0 O 0 0 4 . Plants 0 0 • 0 0 0 5 . Animals 0 0 0 O 0 0 6 . Energy & Natural Resources 0 0 0 0 0 , 7 . Environmental Health 0 0 . 0 O 0 0 8 . Land & Shoreline Use 0 0 . 0 • 0 0 0 9 . Housing 0 0 0 • • O 0 0 10 . Aesthetics 0 0 o a o o 11 . Light & Glare 0 , 0 0 1.2!: Recreation 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 Historic & Cultural Preservation ° 0 0 r 0 0 0 14117 Transportation 0 0 0 0 15I. Public Services 0 0 0 16 Utilities 0 >< 0 0 .. P COMMENTS : -5ce cot-,5 , ,- ..C\M%IC° 1)Ekit:loPr!I"c-rn AVO 1.i(A-6 c!,..: ,-,s?c v;6(„) EA- !: " -t•cAl SilE.-el- 1 , . / .-In' 1 k-• ' • ''.:i t i 7 , i1 .- M .---'// . • \______--- . I We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas 1 which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable imact or are where additional information is needed to properly- assess- this p#oposal . 1 I . .5/ Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Da t EP e ,,. , • . ,Rev. 6/88 1Ir . • Cify of Renton Technical Advisory Committee • MEETING NOTICE • June 22, 1990 To: Paul Lumbert Mark Isaacson Glen Gordon Sam Chastain Penny Bryant Jim Hanson From: Don Erickson, Chairman Meeting Date June 22, 1990 ' • Time: 8 30 AM Locat on Third Floor Conference Room Agenda is listed below. TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA JUNE 22, 1990 Third Floor Conference Room Commencing at 8:30 AM TIME/KEY PARTICIPANTS NEW PROJECTS LEADY RETAIL BUILDING ECF;SA-049-90 Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 10,500 square foot retail center. The center will be subdivided to suit tenant requirements as space is leased. DISCUSSION BOEING WATERFRONT TRAIL ECF;SM-061-90 Design and construction of a pedestrian trail along the north boundary of Boeing's Commercial Airplane's Renton Plant. The trail is to extend from the western edge of the plant near the mouth of the Cedar River to the eastern edge at the Puget Power property lines. 1 1 ,1 ..... ..........:•:•:•::::::::::::.:::::. :::::::.::':::.:iii:.MU::::.:::::::::iiii:.iii:i: ::::::::::::::•0.::........:i.:::.:.:.:::::.::.:•:.::.:;.:•::::::::::::Maia::::0-:::••• •••,77.:•••,;...-•• •'•r:;...'Ll''''''ky.'::1:::r.H.:::'..A.::-i::H.''''K:''.r.N''':''':'''''h:.''R-.':V.:::;t.:::.::a.MMIT:tEt:M: :MO•U:.g :.:M: : :::*:.: :•a:..........iii:iii:::.:•MQ.:::::00:...C:,:n •••••: '...ii.r.i.:i.:,::1.•.c:iit...!.174..k.;;:;47. , :. :i,;!...)1::1 .,,..,...,,:,.,:::::.:-:-..................:;:i:::::::: :::::::::•:::.::•:::.:::::: .:::ai:Min.M.::: ::?.:•: : :::: ::::al'Q.:•: . :.::::::'::::::::::::::':::::::::::::::::::::"::::: :.:::::::::ii::::::i::::?::::::::::::::::.:)::: °::::*.:::"":::::"":;i: ::::::::::::tteAP.FitteP01.14:V.::: ::M?:::::.:M:: ::i0:::::.M.:::jiM:::::6.: ::: •:::: *...*i...iiie.:•.M.:::•::: :::::::::::4::::::::::::4:::::.:::": ::::::::::::'4.:;:::::::1:i.:?:::::::4Mig:iii.::::.::::.!:81:::::::::ii:T:il•g:1:•;iiiii:::iii%:::::::•!ij:46.4,IgiiiI ggPiiiiiiniiiiiii::::;:i.::iii::.!: iiiiiit::.:11 ::31:ii:i.2...ii!: T...ii.nii•!.b.".E:::::::Nii.:•::.:::M •••••••••••••:•-•::?...:.:::.:•::::•:•:•:.••••••••:::•:::•:•:.•:-?•:::-:::,..5.::.::::::::::::•:::•:•:•::::::::::::.::::::::::::,:::•::::::::::::::::::::::*:.::::M::::::::.:.:•.:: :::::::::::::::::::::::....:.:.:.:.:.:.:.,:.:...................................... ....0::::•:::im:................i:.:::::::? :...:...:::....:i::::,:i:.;:i:i::,:i:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::......:.:....:.:....:.:.:.:..................... . 11 '...........:-..••••••••••••••:•::::::::::::::::'::::i..i:::i*i:ii! ' s''"""".••••••••'''''''.:".:".:*:':::::::.::.5.iii:.:i5;:.:.':::::::.ini:::n.::::::.1:iiiig:::::0;iii.iiii:::....%::.: :::::::.... *:.,..............?.:.:.,.........:..?•oi„ :.:-:::::::::::::::::::*i::::::':::*i'''''''''"'"••,""::"-i:::::•:::::::::::::: ::::.:::::::::::::::::**::::1:?':::*:::-:•:::::::::::::::::::::::::::.:K:::::;.::::.::::::::i :::::: :: :.:•:::::::::::::::::::::*,*•::':*:*i:::1::::::::::":•"::i::.:i*.:::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::•: : :.::::::::::•:: ''..... .::.:::::.::•:.::::.M.:::•::::::::::::::::::: :::::.:•::::::::::::::**:*:.:•:::::::::::::::•.0i*:::-.:?::.... ::::::.:::::::.:::::.*?..::::•:.:: ::.*i*... n......it.:i*i*:::::::::*:.::.*:::::::::•:.::::::::::::::•::::::•:':*::i:: ::?::::::::•:.:: :: ::::.:M:::.: :a::.: ::;: ::: :.::::::::.: :U. ...0.: :: : iiT :.:::::::::::::.:1:::.::.:::::.'.::::.:•:A.':::11„:.:.::n:'.:•,..:::::.i.:r..:::.::i.A:".::KI::::'-'1,:';':::::*::::•0::::: :::::*:•*;•::::::::.:•.::•.:::.::4:::Mig:).0:n:.:::::.:t.f.i..11.#.000K.L:04.0.k.: :::::ig *:::•:: :::::.::i;.•:0::: : :.:i.:.a.M.: :::::).:: :::::uii...:•..:Ai ,:..11 ::•:::::.::::::::::.:::::::.:eir r•Li v.;:iriiN.4.:;::::::::::::::::::::::.:: : : ::.::.... ..:i:::.:::: ::::.::::.:::]::.:i::,::: : ::.:';:i::.*.:*:.:....i::::::::::::.:.::;:i..i.:::::::.::::,a:::::::.:ii: n:i::.: ::.:*:::::.:::i:iii:::::::::............. .......::?...:)......::::::....::, ..... .....,:: :::,............... ., iii.4.::: ..... • ....:: ::::::::::::::::... • ''''''''''. ....... ....:::::::. .....: :::::::::::::''''''''::::: *::).......;:::::*::::::::*.::..:.::::::° :::::: :::::::::: .:i:::.:M ::::::..0:::::::k.::::M..::::::::::::::::::::::::::.:::.:&1........ .-..s..:...'.....,..i:':.•:::::!•:',.....:.!:::....:y,..:.-., . rtiY;,,;. , „*:.:..,:::::::.::::4:::Mtg:iiiiI,:::::::::: :::::m:•: . . :: ::::::,:L66ak:11dtai): 01101oggn:::g.::........*iiiiii.:: : .niiaim::A...,:.:::::,?::::::::::,....,::::.:::::.:,?......:g :) Y.... :.::4::.0::.0.::...:..............)i.::.:::::::: ::.0::: : : : :: : ....:::: ,....,:,.:.:::::::::::::::::::„....,,..:,,,,,...:::::::::::, ,m:.....::::;;,..s,m,..:.. .:....,.......:, ,,..:.... .:,,..:.:,....,.::::::::::..:::::.,,.........::::.,,,,,:.,,,...:::,....:::::::„.m... 4n ........:•••••..........:::::::i.::::::::::::::::.:::.:::..:1:C.:::::::::'''.::::::::::::;.::::i'DESCRIPTibkiW.1.1:i466s:X:6;:::::::..i.:::::.;:::::1;:...:::..': ::1::1::.::::-:::::::::::.i'Ao'...:1.'ii.:cg.iie..........:.:::::14:.:01..::::::614.0::::.:..::::0:0:010'..):01:.:1:f0r.....::::4::1.........0p.......o.....p.::....::::.:s51v5g1.1, :::•:•:•••••••••••••••••::::••••::••••••••••):::::::: :::-:::::::;:::::i•::::::::::.:: ::: :::: :: :,:i .::::•:iii:M•::•:.:•::::::::n.: ::::.w.:10(5t::...i.04i1::::,0.4.0),.....,i.,1•:::.:...T.p....01::i.1p..pI" .:.y,/i),ii.i13.........p....:.....:.:::..,.§.....,:,..y....,.....„b:d..,,......:J......y.;)ti......,:e...............di:„...1.. ...i.::,,...?y..... ,,,..i 6iiiii:74:::::a4iArompnt§,a§...:§pqqAi§::::lp.. . .. q:2,.::::: ::: :,....:::::::::::::::::::.::,:::.::,:::::::: ::.m........„:0=;:::.... ..............::::::.::::::::„.:..............:;,...,.:,..,:,:,,,:::,:::..::,::::::,„ i66Xild...0.6Rp:60::.-..-0..:6§..A....L.....,;.:::::::1::::.,:iii.:::.:,:;:iiiiiiii::::::.:ii:::::::::.:::-::::::::::,:i::::.:.:14....5......4.....:6........i: ..0..003poomo...,,,,,,,,,,,,:,,,:,:„.::::,:,:.:,..,...::::,,::::::.:,:,.....„.:::::::.::::::::::::.................../..........................:... , , • I I• • L . , T. . . 1 • . , •. . tiv-{,- , mi,ga- fi A , • ---N\ , . • , >;-14-fr.11-.-lc-1 • \____j__-- .....% ,2 : ,,- ,-- _ , • . Ai . . Il Ica! . . .p.-.1., ,um,.., -'5 ' • ..I di • a_ 1 ,„ . I.IJ. ----------1 i d_. 1 .. . . ,,,,,,„,•,,-- T , . , . ,. mullmil1.,,,,,_ 1 ,..,..__,.. .._,.L. .. . ..7,..,..).„. ... f . , - • , • 1,h ., , „ . , , , , . . . TM-- ••-•-• • _..,...,,,;" • . •-• • I [ . . ' ria..-ri-F-t..r-ux Hoi.J•5 .6, / j2:1. .‘..\;,•••••001,...,r. .,. !'-- _•,/ , •• • I'. '. 7'4.4.1,• -- % I, --i- \\ . *. n-I •I 1 i -1111172:;\) • \ -' 1, .•. ill • Igo w- _L. %N 1 ,,, •-(...y(). •, •41 :• •ax.15111 . ‘ - ::) 1 it • -'t, ' _ : • _ • / ./ , .. . . • . ' (0 . _,..„----->> _......- -- ' . • P " • 1. -- ..---- ..„...— . • . . 1. ., ... .....,... -- I I 1 , ,,,i_r-Eic_1--,,H•-, -7 - , e.- 1--i-ri,- . .-. - • E.X.151-11-16i • ..- ...,... ;;•--'' ,„,.,----''' •:-. ' --''''''.- .,..---<-: l ' 1 • . 1 1 1 _ --I I, •...-5----1. . I 1\31 1 . 4_21.'_ • . -1.1,ii %ill _ . - . . . ZR • • %Ji l•- . •c_=..---.- • . II' . • . . . [ I I . I • • . 11 . r ' ' ' • . . • . i I1 g., . CIY-IGE-- • a-X.I•eirlt-'4, I I rl- 1 •-••L -- ....,.------- - .I ----- -- . Hf . I . . . • • "1#1.•rg-r11-7...&a. I . . I-4=1,-D1 • • 'I I I -'---\ 11 I I \. , Technical Advisory Committee.waif Report ' -Leady Commercial Center June 22, 1990 �; Page 2 j LAND USE 1. Whether the proposed development is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the Land Use Map designation? The proposed commercial development is consistent with the commercial designation established on both the Comprehensive Plan Map and the Land Use Map. 2. Whether the proposed development is consistent with the Zoning Ordinance and other applicable regulations/standards? The development, as proposed by the applicant, generally addresses Zoning Ordinance elements' (e.g., Commercial Use [4-31-10], Landscaping [4-31-34]; Site Plan Review Ordinance [4-31-33]l Parking and Loading Ordinance [4-14]). Some modifications to the plan, particularly to the parking and landscaping plans, may be required at the time of site plan review; these modifications can be achieved without major alteration to the proposed development. 3. Whether the proposed development is consistent with vicinity land uses? The subject property is bordered to the north by a public storage facility, to the east and south by properties developed with commercial uses and to the west by a property zoned for limited commercial use which is now vacant and unimproved. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS �1 1. Whether the applicant has adequately identified and addressed the following environmental! impacts likely to occur in conjunction with the proposed development? a. Land Use/Aesthetics Impacts: Commercial development appears appropriate to the site, based upon site characteristics (size, configuration, etc.) and based upon the fact that abutting properties are zoned for and primarily developed with commercial uses, or other uses which are consistent with commercial development on this site. No substantive environmental impacts are identified. The proposed 10,500 square foot, one-story structure generally meets or exceeds Code standards as proposed or can be readily modified to do so -- for example, at the time of site plan review, staff will recommend the addition of roof treatment to the east and west sides of the structure to address aesthetic impacts. Recommendations will also be made to reduce the number of parking stalls from 53 to 44 to address Parking and Loading Ordinance requirements and to redesign parking to ensure safe, effective circulatiori! Additionally, recommendations will be made to utilize space now dedicated to parking to increased landscaping to provide a more visually pleasing environment. Finally; recommendations will be made to provide an on-site exterior lighting plan to illuminate the site. ,' Mitigation Measures: None required. Policy Nexus: Not applicable. b. Noise, Light and Glare Impacts: Activities on the subject property are anticipated to generate some sound, light and glare, based upon the number and type of commercial activities undertakers thereupon. No significant impacts are anticipated; levels of sound and light are expected to be similar to those generated by abutting commercial uses and adjacent Sunset Boulevard, which is a principal arterial. At the time of site plan review, staff will establish recommendations for design and location' of parking areas to address occurring noise impacts, and for design/location of landscaping and lighting on the site,to mitigate light and glare impacts. Mitigation Measures: None required. • Technical Advisory Committee ,., Report -:Leady Commercial Center June 22, 1990 Page 3 • Policy Nexus: Not applicable. c. Transportation Impacts: The proposed commercial development is anticipated to generate approximately 427 ADWVTE onto Sunset Boulevard, a heavily travelled roadway with mixed levels o'II service. The site is also proximate to the Sunset Boulevard/Anacortes Avenue intersection,which is scheduled for realignment and signalization to improve service levels . in that area. Mitigation measures recommended for this development will include a traffic mitigation fee for a fair share of improvements to the Sunset Boulevard/Anacortes Avenue intersection; limited entry and exit points, and directional signage. Additionally, the applicant will be called upon to participate in the development of a crossil easement providing entry/exit access for the subject site and for the immediately abutting property to the west via Anacortes Avenue. Mitigation Measures: Please see Recommendation #1. Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance, 4-6; Streets and Arterials Plan. d. Public Services Impacts: Staff from the Public Works Department, Fire Prevention Bureau and Police Department report that resources available are adequate to serve the site with standard improvements (e.g., utility lines, signage, and hydrants). The site is in Zone 2 of the APA. As a result, in conjunction with site plan review, the City will establish a condition calling for the determination of suitable uses and the development of special improvements with specific uses, as necessary to protect the aquifer. Uses and improvements are to be approved by the Planning Division, the Public Works Department and/or the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Parks and Recreation Department notes that the subject property is located within an area of Renton which is targeted as a priority area for public recreation improvements. A, voluntary contribution toward these improvements is recommended. Mitigation Measures: See Recommendations#2, and #3 land #5. Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance, 4-6; Aquifer Protection Area; Comprehensive Parks Plan. e. Construction Impacts: Standard construction-related impacts are anticipated from the development of this site, including noise, dust, debris and traffic. Thus, standard mitigation elements are determined to be sufficient to address these impacts. Mitigation Measures: See Recommendation #4. Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance, 4-6. TRANSPORTATION 1. That the applicant, in order to mitigate transportation impacts, provide: a) a fair share • contribution of $4426.00 toward the realignment and signalization of the Sunset Boulevard/Anacortes Avenue intersection; and b) restrict access to right in/right out only for the western most ingress/egress point for the subject site. (Note 1.a: The applicant may be called upon to participate in the development of a cross) easement providing entry access from the subject site to the immediately abutting property, to the west and obtaining exit passage rights T6chnical Advisory Committee Drdrf Report ,' '-Leady Commercial Center June 22, 1990 Page 4 • from the subject site via the Anacortes Avenue access on the immediately abutting property to the west. If such an easement is established, it should be approved by the City Attorney and recorded prior to the issuance of site preparation/building permits. AQUIFER PROTECTION 2.- That the applicant, in order to mitigate impacts to the City's sole source aquifer, provide an agreement, in conjunction with site plan review to submit to the City for approval of proposed specific uses, in order that the City may ascertain that such uses are suitable, or can be improve to be suitable, for development in Zone 2 of the APA. Uses and improvements are to be approved by the Planning Division, the Public Works Department and the Fire Prevention Bureau. The agreement is to be valid for the life of the project, and is to be approved by the Cit, Attorney in advance of the issuance of site preparation/building permits. CONSTRUCTION 3. That the applicant provide a construction mitigation plan including the following components: a) an erosion control element; b) an element for wheel-washing of all construction vehicles prior to leaving the site; c) an element for watering down the site periodically to control dust and debris; d) an element for restriction of hauling routes and hours of hauling operations; and e) an element for signage of site and structures during construction to facilitate emergency service provision. These elements/plans are.to be approved by the City prior to issuance of site preparation/ building permits. In addition, staff recommend: RECREATION 4. That the applicant be encouraged to make a voluntary contribution toward the development of public recreation facilities in the area which may be utilized by the center's employees and/or consumers. (NOTE: At the time of site plan review, staff will recommend conditions including, but not limited to: 1) extension of roof treatment to the east and west sides of the structure; 2) redesign of the parking area tot reduce 53 provided spaces to 44 required spaces, including the elimination of the four parallel parking spaces, in order to ensure safe, effective circulation; 4) introduction of additional landscaping to provide a� more visually pleasing environment; 5) development of an on-site exterior lighting plan to illuminate thel site; and 6) development of a thematically integrated signage plan. O :we n ::::::::•:•:ent th.;. ;:r: >:::•:t Th:>:::: c rr meat e s a e .e ,e .ed a d comme etl u on e o ......................................................................................... ...... . .......... .......... ...... . .... . .. . ..................................................... ................................................................................................ .............. ....... ....... .. ....... .................................................... .... ............................... ............................................................................................................................................................... • I iI June 22, 1990 • it To: Paul Lumbert Mark Isaacson • Glen Gordon Sam Chastain Penny Bryant �I Jim Hanson .I From: Don Erickson, Chairman ;1 t::•::•;:::: t::: : : :; �un:•::::22�>1990 > > >`> >> :> > > :>`;: : :z»:> > z:>: > : :z > >' >:,:: s sli 'Ttir '`FI r Co a en Ia � Agenda is listed below. • TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA JUNE 22, 1990 Third Floor Conference Room Commencing at 8:30 AM TIME/KEY PARTICIPANTS NEW PROJECTS • Ij LEADY RETAIL BUILDING ECF;SA-049-90 Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 10,500 squar foot retail center. The center will be subdivided to suit tenant requirements as space is leased. DISCUSSION BOEING WATERFRONT TRAIL ECF;SM-061-90 it Design and construction of a pedestrian trail along the north boundary of Boeing's Commercial Airplane'is Renton Plant. The trail is to extend from the wester''n edge of the plant near the mouth of the Cedar River to the eastern edge at the Puget Power property lines. I I II I • JUN — •1 - 90 FR I C. : 04 IA I LL I Pi Fl . BECHTDLD P a3AI3o3IJ WILLIA i 1 . :BECHTOLD 0661. 8 - Nfr ATTORNEY AT LAu NOIN3U 3O A110 NOISIAIO 9NINNVId `NE :RNIA.92649 3-2667 - 0 - r ._I r" FC 1 0 - C. '-F W J. L L 1 I I 11 I - 0 C L rl . .J I- L ITILLIAM M. BECHTOLD OLD ATTORNEY AT LAW 80:12 STA T MONT LANE ,, :. to < (1, CALIFORNIA 92649 , "Y14) 846-2667 PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON JUN - 8 1990 RECEIVED J UN — Y — %al@ I- K 1 8 : i . W I LL I F4I"1 I"1 . j: u H I I_IL lI r' . I. ` • We are scheduled to appear before the Planning and Developmont Committee on Tun!*•-lay, June 12 , 1990 at 1: 30 PM at the Renton cit.:: Hsii ! . f F c.•;.nfore.?ICE,.' room. My partnee ord 7 .:.1 " _ ke t . .r_ &t 9 : 25 a.m. and we wo!-:_ - - • r 10: 3 0 'r a, m. ,. get 1" 1< 1 G 11 1.1 1 L 1_ 1 FI 1.1 1.1 . 1'S C Iv 1"1 1 lJ 1- 1.1 1- . R7 Y • • Jr1 } I r f It' 1 w • ;gir:t • i3? 4 F+ ' I %0 CITY OF RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Planning Division May 10, 1990 Ned Nelson 3 Lake Bellevue Drive #200 • Bellevue, Washington 98005 Re: Leady Retail Building, 4546 Sunset Boulevard, (SA049-90) Dear Mr. Nelson: The Community Development Department has formally accepted the above referenced application for preliminary review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Technical Advisory Committee on June 8, 1990. Following that review you will be notified that: 1) your application is complete and has been scheduled for environmental review and determination, or 2) that additional informatidn is required to continue processing your application for environmental review. If you have any questions, please contact Lenora Blauman, project manager, at 235-2550. Since , Donald K. Erickson, AICP Chief, Current Planning • DKE/mr cc: Chris Leady 2000 124 Avenue N.E. #8100 Bellevue, Washington 98005 • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 Facsimile (206) 235-2513 OF R4, (f . o O U `'o © ZNCTICE 99. 5` O,fl1r.0 SEPTBI'0 . OF_ PENDING SITE PLAN APPLICATION Leady Retail Building DESCRIPTION : ECF;SA049-90 Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 10,500 square foot retail center. The center will be subdivided to suit tenant requirements as space is leased. GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS: 4546 Sunset Boulevard PUBLIC APPROVALS REQUIRED : • Environmental Review Site Plan Approval Building Permit PUBLIC COMMENTS WILL BE RECEIVED BY THE BUILDING .& ZONING DEPARTMENT :ANYTIME PRIOR TO. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND DURING PUBLIC HEARINGS. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED --. - -WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION - CERTIFICATION • I , Mo0Y[.i .. �A_ve IA ,"HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ry r;vn T.rc nr . /OF 1?4, k? 0J Tj SEP OF_ PENDING SITE PLAN APPLICATION Leady Retail Building DESC R I P T I O N : ECF;SA 049-90 Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 10,500 square foot retail center. The center will be subdivided to suit tenant requirements as space is leased. GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS 4546 Sunset Boulevard PUBLIC APPROVALS REQUIRED : Environmental Review Site Plan Approval Building Permit PUBLIC COMMENTS WILL . BE RECEIVED BY THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT .ANYTIME PRIOR TO PUBLIC HEARINGS AND DURING PUBLIC HEARINGS. ' FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION I NOTICE OF PENDING SITE PLAN APPROVAL RENTON,WASHINGTON A Site Plan Application has been filed and accepted with the Current Planning Division of the Community Development Department. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. DESCRIPTION: Leady Retail Building ECF;SA 049-90 • Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 10,500 squa re foot retail center. The center will be subdivided to s4 tenant requirements as space is leased. 9' GENERAL LOCATION: 4546 Sunset Boulevard PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review Site Plan Approval Building Permit The application can be reviewed in the Current Planning Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval. For further information on the application or dates of final action by the City, please contact the Community Development Department, Current Planning Division at 235-2550. i \ (�tiY7caNT- \YY{{\\ - 295.co' N EB'A9'2i' J 1 al I2I:TAIL. CI-IIIAING \, t"14R'S , `,['- , N \vk, v,,,,. Nfu,---..-,„\ \ ` Go-nb'- io.5m e.r< \ � UNIT Grtof Fim,�i .\ \\ \ ` • 2,-0. 9�-p+ 21-9+ 1 _-i'I S'.o' 3!'-�n � 7r I' I_ �: \ ,1 & \ - \' i F \ L, 1\ \ —' }/III STA:.LS , , �~w\ \ 1 1 o �—' \\ _ \ \b •\\Qr`"�\ \. • . - I o Z\VV, 7:?ALE /— N \ \ \`� • n \ '. G G I I Y�%~ \li1.G N OV11 Y Uh" \ y e. i ' % o,p2' �'G h I , N SITE FLAN I'-2d-o" r I 5 i I 1 „ . 1 .I F I REN_-_! COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT D LRTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET 61-tA-LO r i;,REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: � ;i DATE CIRCULATED: May 10, 1990iCOMMENTS DUE: .May 24 , 1990 ECF 049-90 , ,•' , APPLICATION: NO(S) : _SA 049-90 ) ECEVED I PROPONENT: Ned Nelson 1.6 ill MAY TO 1990 PROJECT TITLE: Leady Retail Bldq. j r1,fi�,rngq '� BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan apmro-val -ford! 10, 500 square foot retail center. The center will be subdivided to suit tenant • requirements as space is leased. 1! H. LOCATION: 4546 Sunset Boulevard I I SITE AREA _37 , 500 sq. ft. BUILDING AREA (gross) : 10, 500 sq ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 0 0 0 . O 0 0 • 2 . Air ° ° ° I I o ° ° 3 . Water 0 0 0 i' •I 0 0 0 � 4 . Plants 0 0 0 O 0 0 II 1 5. Animals 0 0 0 O 0 ° d 6 . Energy & Natural Resources 0 0 ° 11 O O 0 M 7. Environmental Health ° ° O 0 0 11 8 . Land & Shoreline Use 0 0 0 11 O O O 9 . Housing ° ° ° i O - 0 0 i 10. Aesthetics 0 0 0 I 0 0 - 0 11. Light & Glare ° ° ° ii o ° ° 12 . Recreation 0 - 0 0 O 0 0 II 11 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° ° 0 O 0 0 14 . Transportation • 0 • 0 0 O 0 0 ' 15 . Public Services 0 0 0 • 11 16. Utilities ° ° ° COMMENTS: II PLANNING ON CITY OF RENTOk MAY 1 419901 LGfio We have reviewed this application with particular attention to o reas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additi al information s needed to properly assess this proposal. /7 (-57- 22-A70 Signat e /f Director or Authorized Representative Date ' ,I Rev;'; 6/8 8 REN'I1' COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DL -L TMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF- 049-90 APPLICATION NO (S) . : SA 049-90 PROPONENT: Ned Nelson PROJECT TITLE: Le,ady Retail Building BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 10,500 square foot retail center. The center will be subdivided to suit tenant requirements as space is leased. ' s LOCATION: 4546 Sunset Boulevard. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION. BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT r COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION i+ PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE . LONG RANGE , PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: " COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE CO MUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON MAY 24 , 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: S(..7) 6; . APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED DATE 3 7-1 V- _ SIGNATU O, TD'IRECTOR OR A THORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/8 . REM:,,,, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT D: RTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET I REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: wruLv1 1 I DATE CIRCULATED: May 10, 1990 COMMENTS DUE:_May 24 , 1990 ECF 049-90 APPLICATION NO(S) : _SA 049-90 PROPONENT: Ned Nelson I l PROJECT TITLE: Leady Retail B.ldq• l 1I BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval forma 10, 500 square foot retail center. The center will be subdivided to suit tenant requirements as space is leased. II LOCATION: 4546 Sunset Boulevard 1I I SITE AREA _37 , 500 sq. ft. BUILDING AREA (gross) : 10, 500 sq fit. Ij IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARIY 1. Earth 0 0 0 II O 0 0 II 2 . Air 0 0 0 1 O 0 0 I� 3 . Water ° 0 0 I 0 • 0 0 4 . Plants. ° ° ° O 0 0 5. Animals ° ° ° O 0 0 6 . Energy & Natural Resources 0 0 0 ;I O 0 0 7 . Environmental Health 0 0 0 jl O 0 0 8 . Land & Shoreline Use • 0 O 0 0 it 9 . . Housing 0 0 0 11 O 0 0 10. Aesthetics 0 ✓ 0 0 I 1 11. Light & Glare 0 , / 0 0 O 0 0 12 . Recreation 0 , 0 0 0 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation. ° ° 14 . Transportation 0 V ° 0 I O 0 O 15. Public Services 0 ✓ 0 0 1 O 0 0 I • 16 . Utilities 0 (..,/ 0 0 COMMENTS: ' a " a_ Cv ` c „ - n^ 4 , '___ . I aill,_ '- -T--e-ti A_Allo t .- t� t'b - ( II 6,1u.) . ot"..S,n ' c":) • rk-u1) --D (01),D9-pi P4-34-c"1- WV-, ..(")_ ---- 1 '0. kip i'L'IL- 8t1)47"-`'t 4-) Y-1, 2_Z{A zc--311- f/k CB--0 We have reviewed this application with particular attention to thoseiareas, in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impacthor areas where additional infor ation is needed to properly assess this ropoal. (X 94./uti ,k_ ,4-t-t 6 %lam' Signature of Directo or Authorized Representative Date ' it Rev j 6/88 I v r I I - I I I 1 � I kol-tcps 3 c'L II i • - it RENTul. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DE__ aMENT . DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ,I ECF- 049-90 APPLICATION NO (S) . : SA 049-90 . PROPONENT: Ned Nelson PROJECT TITLE: Leady Retail Building L BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 10, 500 square foot retail center. The center will be subdivided to ,Suit tenant requirements as space is leased. LOCATION: 4546 Sunset Boulevard ,I TO: I PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. .DIVISION 11 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT !4 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT l it BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION I� SHORT RANGE • LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: ' • COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN ,I WRITING. . PLEASE. PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON MAY 24 , 1990 . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: C li DA- APPROVED '✓ APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED DATE SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR QR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/£9 rJ - q� �/ I REN'�--1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT D ,.,�RTMENT -ov,o'4!�, �t9®,��,i ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET : -.'ib h, REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: p0-6pQ, L ,, ?`;i9,0 DATE CIRCULATED: May 10, 1990 COMMENTS DUE: May 24 , 1990 ECF 049-90 APPLICATION NO (S) : SA 049-90 PROPONENT: Ned Nelson ;I PROJECT TITLE: Leady Retail Bldg. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval fora 10, 500 square foot retail center. The center will be subdivided to suit tenant requirements as space is leased. LOCATION: 4546 Sunset Boulevard SITE AREA _37, 500 sq. ft. BUILDING AREA (gross) : • 10, 500 sq ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° ° ° - • ° 0 0 2 . Air ° ° ° ti o 0 0 1 3 . Water 0 0 0 o 0 0 4 . Plants . 0 0 0 o 0 ° S. Animals 0 0 . ° o ° 0 'I 6. Energy & Natural Resources • 0 0 ° 7 . Environmental Health 0 0 H O 0 0 1 8 . Land & Shoreline Use 0 0 0 o 0 0 9 . Housing ° ° 0 ° 0 0 10. Aesthetics ° ° ° o ° ° 11. Light & Glare V 0 0 ° H o 0 0 12 . Recreation ° ° ° ° 0 0 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° ° ° 1 o 0 0 14 . • Transportation ° 0 ° 11 O O O . 15 . Public Services ° y ° ° ° 11 16. Utilities ° ° ° '� • COMMENTS: i 1 PU(LC4 paOuLvr ' . r5 PUTA 5167(COIL A)v i A- N6 Cktib c 'o\ efti2,(A4. ?We have reviewed this applicat n th partular attentionto thoselareas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impactor areas where addi ' onal information is needed to properly assess this propoial. 6 Signature of Dire or o uthorized Representative Date il Rev:• 6/88 RENT61, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DE1__LTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF- 049-90 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA 049-90 PROPONENT: Ned Nelson PROJECT TITLE: Leady Retail Building BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval fora 10,500 square foot retail center. The center will be subdivided to Inuit tenant requirements as space is leased. '. I LOCATION: 4546 Sunset Boulevard II TO: �I PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: - I UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT' BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON MAY 24, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS IZ NOT APPROVED OD/ 66 bta-nw. took pituat 9--(A7cLou, to- Aut. sa- P4 - -y Lot ?0 � VL OfiLss wwk W /i0( (A tocc DATE M524 ; SIGNATURE OF DIRECT OR A ORIZED REPRESENTATIVE h REV. 6/88 m O 44c REN.L%Ad COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT D��ARTMENT OP ei� Aq,�, 9c '�/S/o ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET 'r(� c,< oN M -,7 ,991 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Pia. � , DATE CIRCULATED: May 10, 1990 COMMENTS DUE: May 24 , 1990 ECF 049-90 ' APPLICATION NO(S) : _SA 049-90 FRECEIVEI II PROPONENT: Ned Nelson NW 1 1 1990 1 PROJECT TITLE: Leady Retail Bldg. PikiiKS43,RECREATION BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval forha 10, 500 square foot retail center. The center will be subdivided to suit tenant requirements as space is leased. LOCATION: 4.546 Sunset Boulevard SITE AREA _37 , 500 sq. ft. BUILDING AREA (gross) : 10, 500 sq ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° ° ° lj O 0 0 2 . Air ° ° ° 1 O 0 ° 3 . Water ° ° ° O 0 0 11 I 4 . Plants ° ° ° O 0 0 1 5. Animals ° ° ° O 0 ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources 0 0 0 #� o 0 0 �I 7 . Environmental Health 0 0 0 'I ii O 0 0 8 . Land & Shoreline Use 0 0 0 O O 0 , 9 . Housing ° ° ° 10. Aesthetics 0 0 0 O 0 0 I' 11. Light & Glare ° 0 0 ,1 O 0 0 11 12 . Recreation 0 0 0 d O 0 0 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° ° ° O 0 0 14 . Transportation ° 0 0 .I O 0 0 15 . Public Services ° ° ° II O 0 0 16. Utilities ° 0 0 !I ii COMMENTS: a p4-Gc-G� 4.0 ,0-0.,.c..� ,2,...-rG d,. 0 .z e9�2 - <- � t i e �j ` III/l - — 1'/- / //1 (�'a'YL-Cr.�9�_( �r��(�te i,�'e'y s� r^� /yLL r/f�-,4 Ld ret4-1=- • (..../ :,'"el.---.5-7-4.4;,_',::-.1:_-___) A.-2--Z--e-- -- /----e--th•••-•-- ..---rX.-4.— G2--7,324-etr / 1 We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those :areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impactor areas where ad ional informat ' on is needed to properly assess this proposal. �Si ature of Director r Authorized Representative Date h Rev.il 6/88 'I I l RENT.±. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DLL—RTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF- 049-90 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA 049-90 IECEIVIE PROPONENT: Ned Nelson i ' .:iY 1 1 1990 ' PROJECT TITLE: Leady Retail Building : PARKS&RECREATION BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for; a. 10, 500 square foot retail center. The center will be subdivided to !suit tenant requirements as space is leased. LOCATION: 4546 Sunset Boulevard TO: 1 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT' SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU II POLICE DEPARTMENT 1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE • • LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT • OTHERS: i I� COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDE! IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON MAY 24, 1990. ' REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: 16r ji APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT AiPPROVED I 1 1 • jl 4 I D4%7"7. DATE ^a 9�/ I,GNATURE OF DI ECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE • REV. 6/8:8 II . ., , /y,. I I REIN v COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT I P,RTMENT op 64, Rc Sio ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET �� IT�oN REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: • R Q, 63:4-Art.24C;0109° kbDATE CIRCULATED: May 10, 1990 COMMENTS DUE: May 24 , 1990 ECF 049-90 APPLICATION NO(S) : _SA 049-90 I PROPONENT: Ned Nelson I PROJECT TITLE: Leady Retail Bldg. I BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval fora 10, 500 square foot retail center. The center will be subdivided to suit tenant requirements as space is leased. ,I II 1 LOCATION: 4546 Sunset Boulevard . SITE AREA -37 , 500 sq. ft. BUILDING AREA (gross) : 10 , 500 sq ft. ' IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 0 0 0 II O 0 0 I I 2 . Air 0 0 0 11 i O 0 0 `I 3 . Water 0 0 0 II I • 0 0 0 4 . Plants ° ° ° II O 0 0 5 . Animals • 0 0 ° i i "I 6 . Energy & Natural Resources 0 0 O 0 0 II 7 . 'Environmental Health 0 0 0 II O O 0 1 8 . Land & Shoreline Use 0 ° ° i O 0 0 !, 9 . Hou,sing ° ° ° O 0 0 10. Aesthetics ° 0 0 1 _ O 0 0 11. Light & Glare 0 0 0 I'l 12 . Recreation 0 0 0 'I O 0 0 • • H 11 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° 0 ° O 0 0 it 14 . Transportation 0 0 0 O 0 0 11 15 . Public Services 0 ° ° l O 0 0 16. Utilities 0 0 0 II COMMENTS: "(J7 'AL I �,zo ecr kmLt.- 4 j qD Vc_00.3eseno) a. /1Cn41/4[,ve.rrs 14/12- I4 Lr Ito'f bet,nuv, /SLiuseT- 131_,dt,, 1 S iv xP0.1(9N tea.Carts sAtt 7L-P 'e- izePo-t rr.." Pat 02 TI, me- el4J9-iiijor- II Myr t.. bei m O'1Pu . 1Pitmee:r• St D tw zesure i0 tur°6'6EZ. O J I wtP(a"—c9wTS. 1 We have reviewed this application with particular attention to thoseiareas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact,lor areas :::: ::i::3z;::h::I:::ff:P:S:z:: toproperlyAe resentative Date '1 •Revd 6/88 ii iI 11 • 1I I RENT__. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DE_ _ZTMENT 1 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF- 049-90 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA 049-90 I PROPONENT: Ned Nelson PROJECT TITLE: Leady Retail Building BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval forma 10 , 500 square foot retail center. The center will be subdivided to suit tenant requirements as space is leased. I I' LOCATION: 4546 Sunset Boulevard I TO: 11 I�� I' PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: i it ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU 1 POLICE DEPARTMENT ,' COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT il BUILDING DIVISION I' i PLANNING DIVISION I I SHORT RANGE 11, LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT 11 1 1 OTHERS: '1 I1 COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON MAY 24, 1990. 1 1 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: (�►J'G (2 ( - APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED it p tea -!-1►. € & L L-� S)t.t ae co,.r-�N 1T• SIDES or Bvii--Not., Ceu- ►e8- Lett,-nA) 1/AE Sibes z« i e Ui6oac.ir 1 FRENA TOEILA L tOL4.) CEaST) FLT1A7 e- Rai Dt 1 aL. C c .,weZev0►` G1-0e7.$ i1 SIC-9N ?go&imp^ Moir IS . CON s,slevr- Ilk—rikizaiouP,oc,T" au of W 1 5-m z e CrtoNyrs . t9�p tie- k PaRi' off' P2 c'4-7: Sl'� l>LAr+1/4.5 S1-1/4Ck91.),c, I -e-c-o r-t,owercr .6eizkiL L4UL 2--- i, 12 I S -1 ec /a` lam( t17 OAX Ql� b1-D(,, dRodzk Le-r Lt.,/ Ste " i, /-Gam I �^1;1-o'"I e8 g -tz-14 t, w Se tut liec,►vaLl to razr rt . 7 i, 1-Qit�.0 DATE 5--Z4/fo i SIGNAT O D RECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 III 1I 1 I it • REN_=_T COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT D___�RTMENT A ,I ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET c/0 ye4 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: S?lak4J-C1c, l�f ��=X�c ee —a k4,k, I; II/A • DATE CIRCULATED: May 10, 1990 COMMENTS DUE: May 24 , 19c(d�, ;,v00 V ECF 049-90_ '1,‘) APPLICATION NO(S) : SA 049-90 PROPONENT: Ned Nelson 1 PROJECT TITLE: Leady Retail Bldg. it BRIEF. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval fora 10, 500 square foot retail center. The center will be subdivided to suit tenant requirements as space is leased. II I I LOCATION: 4546 Sunset Boulevard I; SITE AREA _37 , 500 Sq. ft. BUILDING AREA (gross) : 10, 500 sq ft. • 11 IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 0 0 1; O 0 0 jl 2 . Air ° 0 id . O 0 ° 3 . Water 0 0 0 I' O 0 0 II 4 . Plants 0 0 . O 0 0 1 5. Animals ° ° ' 0 O 0 0 6. Energy & Natural Resources 0 0 0 O 0 0 7 . Environmental Health 0 0 0 o o ° Ih 8 . Land & Shoreline Use 0 0 0 ,I O 0 0 . 9 . Housing ° ° ° o _ 0 0 i 10 . Aesthetics 0 0 0 O 0 0 11. Light & Glare 0 0 0 I. O 0 0 12 . Recreation 0 0 0 d O 0 0 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° 0 ° is O 0 0 14. Transportation 0 0 0 jl O 0 0 I; 15 . Public Services ° ° ° II O 0 0 it 16 . Utilities ° [// ° ° II, COMMENTS:,r,v d ^,a4Cat.Gd �i.-Q� 6 z APR' /a iinz ,o,-J V Gdild„et...4 / fa4-041-'4" .,, ,c1 `j'il ir-``L'4"' &- -71-(44',=-.'-i-fr,;!1, ‘. • ( fie, /S-5 , 2 �e--4(5 ,0,1 `ate So- kr �.,-- ,d- 11 ;I We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where addit.' onal information is needed to properly assess this proposl. 11 Signature of Direc r or A horized Representative Date / Rev. ;6/88 1 RENTviv COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEL TMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET '� ECF- 049-90 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA 049-90 i PROPONENT: Ned Nelson PROJECT TITLE: Leady Retail Building BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval fora 10 , 500 square foot retail center. The center will be subdivided to suit tenant requirements as space is leased. LOCATION: 4546 Sunset Boulevard TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: II ENGINEERING DIVISION jl TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU 1 POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT it BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE I LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON MAY 24 , 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 1,40T APPROVED fir- 4411 ,ak��' �► - '�`''� �'�' ��`��Z 4/e<4, ely -&.g ,(A/d4„-ett .4k) ;66 d, cticr-,--(x...) ate,-) A404,4,4 ‘,/,14,0 h-cdfrel-.) -(<(x/a id-zdiM," 114-Q bc-d'-' uli( -614864P7''' 1611r19 ,, u � ,� �� di m dea61-• !i 1N VP-al.-*r) Al,ez SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR 0 AUTHORI REPRESENTATIVE DATE /.5 ` 7;i REV. 6/8;8 (P, P /� X mac, ,G�i/✓YGI�r.J�G!/�+V / .5/ �' ' frje14-fA\I'd' -e41-' A.�.�1Li9-�' J % I ,_' REN J COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT E URTMENT RENTON FIRE Do ENVIRONMENTAL ECKLIST REVIEW SHE pREVENTION 6U ��e,„ 'QtC /9 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ,�� MAY 1 0 "� : 1 'lb/OM DATE CIRCULATED: May 10, 1990 COMMENTS DUE:-—6fib b �. , , '�99' 11 . ECF 049-90 69 APPLICATION NO(S) : _SA 049-90 PROPONENT: Ned Nelson j I PROJECT TITLE: Leady Retail Bldg. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval fora 10, 500 square foot retail center. The center will be subdivided to suit tenant requirements as space is leased. LOCATION: 4546 Sunset Boulevard SITE AREA _3.7 , 500 sq. ft. BUILDING AREA (gross) : 10 , 500 sci ft. it _ IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth . 0 0 0 O 0 0 , • 2 . Air 0 0 0 1 O 0 0 3 . Water 0 0 0 O 0 0 4 . Plants 0 0 0 O 0 0 ,1 5 . Animals 0 0 0 'I O 0 0 6 . Energy & Natural Resources 0 ° O 0 0 . 7 . Environmental Health 0 0 0 O 0 0 ,I 8 . Land &Shoreline Use 0 0 0 O 0 0 1 9 . Housing 0 0 0 O 0 0 ,0 0 0 10. Aesthetics ,I O 0 o it 11. Light & Glare 0 0 0 • 0 0 0 it 12 . Recreation 0 0 0 O 0 0 i 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° 0 0 i O 0 0 14 . Transportation 0 0 0 O 0 0. • 15. Public Services • ° 0 0 O 0 • 0 16 . Utilities 0 0 0 i COMMENTS: it ii We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those: areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact,, or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess. this proposal. . ' 401/4", _,,- ,-___ l a/ /77 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Dat Rev;! 6/8 8 1 RENT_ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DE __aTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF- 049-90 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA 049-90 PROPONENT: Ned Nelson PROJECT TITLE: Leady Retail Building BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 10 , 500 square foot retail center. The center will be subdivided to suit tenant requirements as space is leased. LOCATION: 4546 Sunset Boulevard II TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: ,1 UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION Ij FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU I POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE - I LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON MAY 24, 1990. II 11 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: FYI Re ,r,-h APPROVED 4--APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED Any development and/or construction shall comply with current Fire and Building Codes and Ordi- nances., A eeoend means of approved access is required. Fire Department access roads/lanes shall bel paved minimum width 20'; minimum height 13' 6". Yes —fVo Preliminary fire flow calculations show a fire flow of '`�� .5 0 '1 is required: hydrants with a minimum flow of gp n each is required. Primary hydrant is required to be within /So . . feet of the stricture. Secondary hydrants are required to be within 3vo . feet of the structure. An-approved automatic sprinkler system is required to protect the total structure. Yes o `� All fire department access roads are to be paved and installed prior to construction. Yes �i; No _ ., P All fire hydrants are required to be installed and approved prior to construction. Yes No DATE 776,/// /OBI /990 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE 1 REV. 6/88 REQUIRED FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS 1. HAZARD IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION NAME: ',Fp A/y/� ,� 7A?4. g/�,/9 U.B.C. CLASS OF BUILD ,�'�4 ADDRESS: ,c/S v„s -7- ,, j�v42, FIRE MGMT AREA 2. DETERMINE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION - CLASS (CIRCLE ONE) : I - II IV III V FIRE-RESISTIVE NON-COMBUSTIBLE ORDINARY FRAME MIXED (NOTE: IF "MIXED," SEE SPECIAL INSTRUCTION FOR AREA AND BASIC FIRE FLOW) 3. DETERMINE AREA: GROUND FLOOR AREA: FT2 NUMBER OF STORIES TOTAL BUILDING AREA: /®, ,y'ed (A) 4. DETERMINE BASIC FIRE FLOW FROM TABLE #1, USING AREA (A) : ,,'75® GPM (B) 5. DETERMINE OCCUPANCY FACTOR ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: Cam--' GPM (C) IF LOW HAZARD, SUBTRACT UP TO 25% OF (B): IF HIGH HAZARD, ADD UP TO 25% of (B) 6. COMPUTE SUB-TOTAL (B+C): (IF B+C LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) / 7S0 GPM (D) 7. DETERMINE SPRINKLER ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: -@— GPM (E) (IF COMPLETELY SPRINKLERED, SUBTRACT UP TO 50% OF (D) : IF LIGHT HAZARD OCCUPANCY AND FIRE RESISTIVE OR NON-COMBUSTIBLE CONSTRUCTION, SUBTRACT UP TO 75% OF (D). 8. DETERMINE EXPOSURE ADJUSTMENT: USING THE TABLE AS A GUIDE, ENTER THE SEPARATION AND ADJUSTMENT FOR EACH OF THE "FOUR FACES" OF THE BUILDING IN THE TABLE AT THE RIGHT: SEPARATION MAX. ADJUSTMENT EXPOSURE SEPARATION ACT. ADJ. 0-10 25% MAX NORTH -G- ADD 2a 6- % 11 - 30 20% MAX EAST 1-/a � ADD 15 % 31 - 60 15% MAX SOUTH / s U'- ADD 4 L % 61 - 100 10% MAX WEST ADD % 101 - 150 5% MAX TOTAL % OF ADJUSTMENT 150 or 4-Hr WALL 0% MAX (NOT TO EXCEED 75%) 5 5- % (TOTAL % ADJUSTMENT TIMES (D) ADJUSTMENT: S- 17_ e S .'GPM(F) 9. DETERMINE ROOF AND SIDING COVERING ADJUSTMENT: (IF SHINGLE COVERING, ADD 500 GPM) ADJUSTMENT: ' GPM (G) 10. COMPUTE ESTIMATED FIRE FLOW REQUIRED: (IF D+E+F+G IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) (IF D+E+F+G IS GREATER THAN 12,000 GPM, INSERT 12,000 GPM) eye ,/� (D+E+F+G) REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: .-/,r,2��U dPM (H) 11. SIGNED: / DATE: / /pf /990 REN'ToN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT I' ENVIRO NTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ci "p RF" 11sso REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 02.4 7 CSC. Utz qy �� I DATE CIRCULATED: May 10, 1990 COMMENTS DUE: May 24 ,E 1 ,O_ 19 ECF 049-90 �a� ' ii APPLICATION NO(S) _SA 049-90 PROPONENT: Ned Nelson :I PROJECT TITLE: Leady Retail Bldg. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval fora 10, 500 square foot retail center. The center will be subdivided to suit tenant requirements as space is leased. j LOCATION: 4546 Sunset Boulevard SITE AREA -37 , 500 sq. ft. BUILDING AREA (gross) : 10, 500 sq ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 0 0 0 O 0 0 , 2 . Air ° 0 0 O 0 0 3 . Water 0 0 0 0 0 4 . Plants 0 0 O 0 o i 5 . Animals 0 0 0 O 0 0 6 . Energy & Natural Resources 0 0 0 O 0 0 7 . Environmental Health 0 0 0 O 0 0 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° ° ° 1' O 0 0 9 . Housing ° ° ° O 0 0 10 . Aesthetics 0 0 0 O 0 0 ;� 11. Light & Glare 0 0 O , 0 0 12 . Recreation 0 0 0 ,I O 0 0 I, 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° 0 0 1 O 0 0 14 . Transportation 0 0 0 i' O 0 0 , 15 . Public Services 0 0 0 16 . Utilities 0 0 0 ,/ COMMENTS: ii I, LI We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those:iareas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impactor areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this propoal. . 0.- .11 tG et i //6/iV Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Am Date Rev 6/88 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT it DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF- 049-90 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA 049-90 I' PROPONENT: Ned Nelson PROJECT TITLE: Leady Retail Building !j BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for'ja 10,500 square foot retail center. The center will be subdivided to suit tenant requirements as space is leased. LOCATION: 4546 Sunset Boulevard TO: II PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: I ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT II COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT .I BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT � �j OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDEb IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON MAY 24 , 1990. it REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: 3(c '- (,jccirev I APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT PROVED — Ca Icwf a-f—loni urhall ,be resuJmi it 71‘or drat'"a( e , the. C v4v eiGaff s 0 83 -'he s d-c dd i *(1, 0 l U d&,,t,o,i u01l be re ui k' fro)-n 1 ,v,4oevr a,4 irrparVl ovs and te,v►o vj crag Wl// 4e sM i /' <1'he CGr lCu t41(OrJ . 'I riv ,SeD( I- E.S.C,, e ,-1- iS accrfobfe fo Plsc La ks fp //6-e sUboirY1-0 , — i !r y 14r5 5 4I cl41-a Eo vet►e 'fr cAco,ges In ,5+Qv'r1 cLr6tr✓,4y�' ctvtd T. E .C.c. P E1- 44 '( ' lF'li DATE /#1Ur !j . SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE al REV. 6/80 ii 'kg REN__A COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT C__ARTMENT o,��M,,� 4' ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEETA . /�k o�147o%,f REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: & UL '* 4'"4 DATE CIRCULATED: May 10, 1990 COMMENTS DUE: May 24 , 190� ECF 049-90 21,%©2N1. APPLICATION NO(S) : SA 049-90 1D MAY 1 4 1990 " , PROPONENT: Ned Nelson Cii{ Y OF REN f ON PROJECT TITLE: Leady Retail Bldg. PUBLIC WORKS CUSTOMER SERVICES 1 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval foria 10, 500 square foot retail center. The center will be subdivided to suit tenant requirements as space is leased. LOCATION: 4546 Sunset Boulevard SITE AREA -37 , 500 sq. ft. BUILDING AREA (gross) : 10, 500 sq ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 0 0 0 O 0 0 2 . Air 0 0 0 O 0 0 3 . Water ° ° ° O O 0 4 . Plants ° 0 ° O O O 5. Animals ° ° ° O 0 0 6. Energy & Natural Resources 0 0 0 O O 0 7. Environmental Health 0 0 0 O 0 0 8 . Land & Shoreline Use 0 0 0 O 0 0 9 . Housing ° 0 0 O 0 0 10. Aesthetics 0 0 0 O O O 11. Light & Glare ° ° ° O 0 0 12 . Recreation 0 0 0 O 0 0 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° 0 0 O O 0 14 . Transportation ° 0 0 O O O 15. Public Services 0 0 0 O O O 16 . Utilities ° X ° ° COMMENTS: 5 CgraMeKsys au p,-c-Pene-o atu> ph rcvoL(.h-6'cs*3 17-v V i6w Sit E-61— M+9 c'ees Itt‘tielfJ ShEei--- q CI �IIl. We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those :areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impactjor areas where additional information is needed to properly assess- this proposal. A'3-auv q�sUr 1)R 51 1 6 /q p; Signature of Director or Authorized Representative e� Date .(�C_ Rev j 6/8 8 RENIviv COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DErriRTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF- 049-90 APPLICATION NO (S) . : SA 049-90 PROPONENT: Ned Nelson PROJECT TITLE: Leady Retail Building 1 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval fors a 10, 500 square foot retail center. The center will be subdivided to �'suit tenant requirements as space is leased. I I LOCATION: 4546 Sunset Boulevard i! TO: .I it PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: !I ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: ,I UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION • FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT I BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION �I SHORT RANGE ii LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT ;1 OTHERS: it COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON MAY 24, 1990. it I I REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: V\IAIER UT1UT'( Et61n1Eer- & De • APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS X NOT APPROVED 'The PREawiu fiP-6 Fuem 'e mmiC, Of 4&aDosen DEVE1aP►,e►.+T 4,2 So GPM) 'Ex tEEns ThE 0.01M1-t t3 ciREFtoW Su4B►.%( 3,3 83 6e1r9 ., 'RECOKKE*�D;, 'ThA" AUi fpF,siGil, � Cat4S'Ce.uetiow KE(vtoos pE USED TO (educe - fhtog6- heEftow (DE-rtpNP TU i-u SYST to AI LAC3 iti j 0 R. 1 W caeoe The P Was 0 1'L tri 1 LOOP Om LAT 2 0c Sk 6I 7-'t- PLAT A P i 1ZE FtAu.) post 'l.T &SS M!a ("e TZC-atv,i - AD 0 Ti oU hl, INVDRAVG flRE RlE61.01k9 C l 4t`tottn4'r F-or1, etiKit 000 &plq of- firLE4 DEMAND) - s Q R tuYtev P�2. 2 ox1 filLE ¶�. (� gtXro►`+�i� e'��s,u.c-rt. s�ts� �s 5 U(41 iT S•E P'OATS- l) ATE-�R.-tA A�iNi \M p czov Ert D ►.I P t'YL 1 `n � STh14.0 ken -F'CSYL '05.uEt,QPEYLS Eu-rts, .1 dp 6T`(s l�TitA-riN65_ �.1 5Ut cV TU 'DFVEI )PhemT re 3 A-r-lk-e-vi Ft-5 Review SriErr- I I11� uli u'r�_ 235-2C3I DATE 5/ 1 6 /156 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE ;I REV. 6/88 I�1 I i FEE APPLICATION: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET CAn ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET 1:::11 PLAN REVIEW ROUTING SLIP OTHER N DATE: (/ /� 9p , /� • APPLICANT. • � 11 . JOB ADDRESS: .c - II NATURE OF WORK: II PROPERTY MANAGEMENT `' y DATE RECEIVED II Comments Due BY 'PROPERTY MGMT. s-/17/-9p Comments or suggestions regarding this. application should be provided in writing. Please provide comments to the Comm: Dev. Dept. (C.D.D.) by 5:00 p.m. on above date. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION 5CRI FEES APPLIED ri CANNOT APPLY FEES O LEGAL DESCRIPTION NEED MORE INFORMATION CJ SQUARE FOOTAGE i Lor 21 S 4 OSZ-$g - ' 0 FRONT FOOTAGE ❑VICINITY MAP It is the intent of this development fee .analysis: to put the developer/owner on notice, that the' fees quoted below will apply to the subject site upon develo ment of the property. All quoted fees are due and payable at the time the construction permit is issued to install the on-site and off-site improvements (i .e. underground utilities, street improvements, etc.) I: LATECOMER AGREEMENT - WATER PRNOECT COST FTG. LATECOMER CITY HELD FEE PRIVATE DEVELOPER HELD _o_ LATECOMERS AGREEMENT - SEWER 4 CITY HELD — o - II RRIVATE DEVE� f1PER :;r� nAkA) Ax pi .wp //- /5-e Ci 'To CO LL 6 T. 230 F.9.2441 �31D/.S!p ' c3, !S'I.D/=1►CiTr.GC�4� SPECIAL UTILITY CONNECTION CHARGE - WATER Single family residential dwelling unit $300/lot x UNITS SUCC FEEI Apartment, Condo, each multiplex unit $175/ea. unit x II Commercial/Industrial $.04/sq. ft. of property x 3? ®off II SPECIAL UTILITY CONNECTION CHARGE - SEWER Single family residential dwelling unit $300/lot x !I Apartment, condo, each multiplex unit $175/ea. unit x II Commercial/Industrial $.04/sq.ft. of property x ,37,90D2:1 Af/,S/6,0d1 * 1 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT Cospital Area) WATER UNITS SAD FEE i! DEVELOPMENTS WITH 1500 GPM FIRt FLO OR LESS: H Area Charge $0.034 per sq f . x II Frontage Charge $16.00 per front ft. x I I DEVELOPMENTS WITH GREATER THAN 10 GPM FIRE FLOWS: iI Area Charge $0.048 per q.f' . x kI Frontage Charge $18. 0i per f ont ft. x --O- 1 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT (Honey Crk. Intercptr) - SEWER UNITS SAD FEE AREA CHARGES: Residential dwelling units, apartments or equivalents; $250 per dwelling unit x Commercial development: I $.05 per sq.ft. of gross site area x 37 9ooL/1 y l 61q e FRONT FOOTAGE CHARGES: $37.19 per Front Ft. (on ea. side) x $74.38 per fr.ft. (prpty .on both sides of imprv.J x p 4- Qed.?,G . Z`o 14:ckt2-4-4-1.' w`. /990. TOTAL: $ /a, 035. '/9 The above quoted fees do NOT include inspection fees, side sewer permits, r/w permit fees or the cost of water meters. • .r s// ' DATE - /S19v l . Signature of Director or Authorized Repr tative O • i - REN f COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT D _ LRTMENT �A� oc�� o/ s�/ o ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET .• y 642 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: d-)2-0.rvalla-71-ee-i-7 C� ,, , ' ,,, DATE CIRCULATED: May 10, 1990 COMMENTS DUE:_May 24 , 1990 ECF 049-90_ APPLICATION NO(S) : SA 049-90 1 PROPONENT: Ned Nelson PROJECT TITLE: Leady Retail Bldg. i1 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval fora 10 , 500 square foot retail center. The center will be subdivided to suit tenant requirements as space is leased. ;1 LOCATION: 4546 Sunset Boulevard II 1 SITE AREA _37 , 500 sq. ft. BUILDING AREA (gross) : 10 , 500 sq ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE ' MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° `° ° • 6 ° ° 2 . Air ° ° ° t O 0 0 3 . Water ° ° 0 O 0 0 II 4 . Plants ° ° ° O 0 0 5. Animals ° 0 ° O 0 0 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° 0 ° li O 0 0 7 . Environmental Health 0 0 0 O 0 0 8 . Land & Shoreline Use 0 0 0 O 0 0 11 9 . Housing 0 0 0 O 0 0 10. Aesthetics 0 0 0 O O O 11. Light & Glare 0 0 0 O O O 12 . Recreation 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation 0 0 O O O 14 . Transportation ° l/ ° ° ;I o ° ° I I 15. Public Services 0 /� 0 O O O 16. Utilities ° /-------0 0 COMMENTS:C�t''l 3.v1 C�`—c Gv�r tr. �,ct '-7-v ' /17 `a S -�///o�/Jj - ,1 cz- , l 1-.. o-le iI SG/--,-7-s�i & 2. ,¢MI a r;--� e ve Ivy' ?.v;744, rti -� __r`./z� / . .-7 0_ --, ..,/; q k 1--A_, ", • , v ;VC , 6 7 b /'', 6-a z.;� /. 0 p`� i 45//tip 7ri,--s ,1 5 7 CiTv)17 tcc<iL> ,.nc?U / 7 / 7Z, ) rZc", f y a / 7'172 = a?, 51-, % cp?u)4-er 'c'X�l `)E b =-.0- 42C , ® r � We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those' areas n which we have expertise and have identified areas of proba le impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. C :,-: PA 11 10 Signature of Director Authorized Re Pre n tive Da / ' C Rev. 6/88 d,, Pns7 /� 74 « , 4k:- / .s—'/S9'/ 2/,R,74 - .ez).#9_ RENT.... COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DE_ _iTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF- 049-90 APPLICATION NO (S) . : SA 049-90 PROPONENT: Ned Nelson PROJECT TITLE: Leady Retail Building BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval fora 10, 500 square foot retail center. The center will be subdivided to suit tenant requirements as space is leased. LOCATION: 4546 Sunset Boulevard TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: 1 UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT 1 I COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION ;I SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON MAY 24, 1990. REVIEWIN DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: r- /a S>,-- 6 �S I I APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED Q P/ CO�, Yid 71-1-7 s 0 7-Yrp#1:e., it4 7)--;a2P.21.),-4 sip-- a t- /k7 vs e. ,e,g ss- cc,,-9,7416Lcv.-1-0,3 A N Y g 26J / 7 /b - 2./1 p 7 6 X /z,, 5 DO gyo f Ex/S l✓ l)- 7 14—x-7/ /,71 ` � L_y ( e 71? ZD 0 2 �1�j y -1 Saozz - it DATE SIGNA URE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZ REPRESE71_, NTATIVE • O� REV. 6/88 0/ /, 1-5 /o 76/„./? ,6) a('. :::::::•:.:::. > ::> »> z >.:.:.:.:.:.:::.:::::::....>:»: MUN TYRE :EI �. .ME:: D PAK <: ::::::i:::::::`:::'t::::: : :: :::M`'..: ;::><::: :>:< ;> ::<>.;:: I>;>>. «::<; <`::• : :>: >� < :> I::< :III im: < »I < � : >' ><::>: < A TER.AR.P L�. .A•. N. .:• ;:.;::.;:.;:;;.;:<.:::.:. ::. ::.>;::.:.;:;.>::<.::.;;:. . : . 1 l :�><� ��`1IUNERI��: � > :<> ::�> � :� >:>:�>:�`:>>: TYPE> >�•�FAAPP T O ' FEE:` ' . . ............ 11 NAME: _'REZONE $ Chris Leady _SPECIAL PERMIT $ 1I _TEMPORARY PERMIT $ :! ADDRESS: _'CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $ 1' 2000 - 124th Ave N.E. #B100 X_SITEPLANAPPROVAL $ 800,1. 00 _SPECIAL PERMIT • $ CITY: • .ZIP: _GRADE&FILL PERMIT 11 $ Bellevue, WA 98005 (NO.CU.YDS: ) II • • _'VARIANCE $ I TELEPHONE NUMBER 4 5 5-0 5 0 4 (FROM SECTION: ) :1 _*WAIVER $ ROUTINE VEGETATION `::;C.O,;,.TAC..T;PERSON:APPLI:CANT ::;:,:,, MANAGEMENT PERMIT $ , (`JUSTIFICATION REQUIRE,„. d ,NAME: Ned `Nelson Architect d e .`•> c�_' . . r--� n 4 l ti r'J ADDRESS: SUBDIVISION: - o s��-,dam o :,f - y 3 Lake Bellevue Drive #200 on v - - _LOT LINE ADJUSTMEN'1;�� °,v: -$; 'I .••• w .,a^n CITY: ZIP: SHORT PLAT °' 'c7 "°°$ '-w_� Bellevue, WA 98005 — r ,.f l TENTATIVE PLAT ,E. ' • f,;. PRELIMINARY PLAT $ 11 TELEPHONE NUMBER 4 5 5-4 9 0 0 —FINAL PLAT $ NO.OF LOTS: • • PLATNAME: ::::» ;PR .`�.�E >:f N F�� >R MA . N> _ _ <I� , PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ ;I Leady Retail Building 1 —PRELIMINARY 1 FINAL PROPERTY/PROJECT ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION: • • 4546 Sunset Blvd. i Renton, WA ___BINDING SITE PLAN: $ ,I KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): 516970-0110-08 MOBILE HOME PARKS: $ '1 —TENTATIVE EXISTING LAND USE(S): _PRELIMINARY none —FINAL iI PARK NAME: :1 EXISTING ZONING: B-1 (Business ) NO.OF SPACES: X ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $ 92. 50 11 PROPOSED LAND USE(S): Retail PROJECT VALUE: $ 325, 000 SENSITIVE AREA: APA: _1 tillOTHER —N/A ellp 1 • SEWER MORATORIUM AREA: YES • PROPOSED ZONING: B-1 ' TOTAL FEES: $ 892. 50 STI'EAREA(SQ.FT.OR ACREAGE): ± 37, 900 s. f. DATE PAID: �J19/9'0 4pDaotoci POSTAGE PROVIDED: NO 1 ?L4NNII a }:::::•iI'�: } *}:4' i {:r:$.:y,?:;:;:;{:;:'r:•:?{�:PiSi•}:•:v:;?•y}iTr::•ii:•>}: l� p • �u ti t e:::c��m 1 i:i: ....P.�.Y.C.o.4:.. :31,g,........ .. .4. .... .... ..� i. ..4!.:!:. . .................. ..... . .......... .. ...... ... ...... .. ::.„ti:; i'.::i}i::}}:::::ititi::,:•::::::•:;:i:;:.}}}}:.}if'iiiii::•:C.:.: :...„.: Numb ; :<>...•:.:•:::.9::. :�;;>::::>;::>:;:•:>:<•:�;:•;::•::•:;•;:•;;:::•::i;:>:•:>::•;:•::•:;;::::: ;;: :;;>.; ::< .. . .... . . : : ;:::R.. E:•;:::;::•::::.>::>::. :.;: ; :.: : ::,•.;.:.:. . ... ......:.:..;.:.;.;.:•.:.;.::.:........;.;.. ;...:..... :..:.....::.•.:.:.:...:. •;;;:..E 17:;: R... HPL::•::.:C .:>:•:.LLA::;:PP ;:F.t:i3::i: : > . • : ai:: ..;i :. :::.:i .: i.:: :. i ,: :: : . ...:: : ;.. : U : : .I :.: SSM :SME» PMH : F�1I BS • : . : .: : : . .. .. . . . . . ............ .... 1 I .»::::V: : . :: ::. ... . .. •:, ::::::: :::::::>:<: :::::>:::::::::::<>:;:>::::<:::: ::>:::::::::> SCRIP.TI.CN..O.F..P.RO.PERTY. ore aC re Ulr. .d`''';;i;>:::>:< :�'`::'��::: :;::: ;:::: :::> `'�I�et'>i ` » »>i> ��M � �>g> < e ea a atta a se ar to s Lot 2 pf Renton Short Plat No. 052-88 (submitted for approval ' 2/16/90) , a portion of Tract 10 of Joseph P. Marshall Tract , . as ' • per Plats, Page 30, Records of King County, lying in the SW 1/4 • of the SW 1/4 of Section 3 T23N, R5E, W.M. , Cit/ of Renton • I. • .... ... ....... .................... .................................................................. ...........*x:::....................... I, 1 Ned Nelson , being duly sworn, declare that I am (please check one) x the authorized representative to act for the property owner,_ the owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted.are in all respects true and correct to the bestjof my knowledge and belief. . SUBSCRIBED OF7—CfJj�(XC.SWORN TO�pRE ME THIS •,_� �' _ " , , -=. U 7 r`_ NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF ' WASHINGTON,RESIDING AT: ' '• Kirkla d 24, / e_ieXieeL 1; S.A. Klebold (Name of Notary Public) • (Signs a of Owner) 201 2nd Street South # 209 2000 — 124th. Avenue N.E. #B100 (Address) (Address) I Kirkland, WA 98. 0. 33 Bellevue, WA 98005 (City/State/Zip) (City/State/Zip) 455-4900 455-0504 (Telephone) (Telephone) i ! . AcIceptance of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete application. Plans and other material required to constitute a complete application are listed in the"Application Procedure." RtnMastr 2/90 V NED NELSON . ARCHITECT THREE LAKE BELLEVUE DRIVE, SUITE 200 BELLEVUE, WASHINGTON 98005 (206) 455-4900 PROJECT NARRATIVE The proposed project will be a 10 , 500 s . f . retail building located ; on a 37 , 900 s . f . site zoned B- 1 . The structure will be type V-N , fully sprinklered , and is targeted to begin construction the summer of 1990 . The proposed retail building shell will take approximately 4 months from the start of the project to complete . Tenant improvements will take place as space is leased . PLANAING coy or ,VrsioN ReAfroN 1 Y9 7990 kikeMEMBER ■ AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS ■ NCARB NED NELSON ■ ARCHITECT THREE LAKE BELLEVUE DRIVE, SUITE 200 BELLEVUE, WASHINGTON 98005 (206) 455-4900 BUILDING COLORS FOR LEADY RETAIL BUILDING Dark (Persian) Blue - .Trim Color • Off (Navaho) White - Body Color Grey - Standing Seam Metal Roof . I . I PLANNING DIVPSIO_�4 CITY OFyglyioN 1990 ‘g 11 VE MEMBER ■ AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS ■ NCARB • • IT'.Y O.': F REN CT N • Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental; agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An, ,Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) 'must be prepared for all proposals with probably significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is! to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to. .reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide, whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist ask you to describe some basic information about your proposal.; Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the...environmental impacts of: your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer.the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. • You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In! most•cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project. plans .without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or If a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. • Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer .these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental. agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all -part's of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period Of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impacts. Use of Checklist for Nonproject Proposals: (Please Type or Print Legibly) Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply'. IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT' ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the i • references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be, read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: mr Retail Bldg. • LEA®), • • 2. Name of applicant:Ned Nelson, Architect • • • 3. Address and phone number Of applicant'and contact person: (z.aco) 455—49oc Three Lake Bellevue Drive, Bellevue , Washington 98005 • 4. Date checklist prepared: / 2-22-90 . 5. Agency requesting checklist: • � fyi�t�t)IVIsI0N Building, and Zoning Department °�Yo�� O�R APR 191990 • -2- 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Begin upon permit issuance 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansions, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. no !8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. none known • Do`youu_:know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. ' none known 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. 1.. Site plan approval . 2. Building permit 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. 10, 500 s. f. one story retail/restaurant bldg on ± 37, 900 s. f. lot 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient Information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section,. township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topography map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans • submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. Adjacent to and directly South from property at 4546 Sunset! Blvd Renton, WA B. • ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS I. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one); flat, rollin: hilly,{ steep, slopes, mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?) Approx 9% 1, • I c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, scaly, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the,classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Assume clayey sp./id/soils test will be executed per conditional use 'approval d. Are there surface indications( or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. • Do( not think so � I • • ' r w • -3- e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate,,guant•iti,es:.of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of--fill: Approximately balanced site f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe: Erosion control per city g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? approximately 85% h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: ' 1. Erosion control per city 2. Complete landscape 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke). during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities ;' if known. auto emmision from customers b. Are there any off-site sources of emission? passing- autos c. Proposed measures to„reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: . none II 3. WATER a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or In the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If.yes, describe type and provide. names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. no 2) Will the project require anywork over, in, or to (within 200 feet) the 9 adjacent described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. no 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from' surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. none . 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give,general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. no • • 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. . no 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. none • I� I , I , -4- b. Ground: • i . 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to 'ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. !! no 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system,, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or'humans the system(s) are expected to serve. none I' c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if'known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters, If so, describe. Rain water is collected from pervious areas in underground pipes. Runoff is controlled with an orifice restrictor ywvh it leaves site 2) Coulldnwaste material enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe.' Waste could enter catch basins in driveways d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Grasses will be planted in pervious areas -:.::.Orifices *ill be used on underground detention pipe 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: f deciduous tree: .lder apl•, aspen, other evergreen tree 4 cedar, pine, other shrubs • CIP crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Site completely cleared and re-landscaped periplan • c. List threatened or endangered species known to be.on or near the site. ' none • d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measure to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any:• per plan I 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site:• j Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, ongbir other yi Mammals:. deer; bear, elk, beaver, othe . SaviR12eLS Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other 1 1 -5- • b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. none known c. Is the site part of ,a migration route? If so, explain no d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Shrubbery and grasses will provide nesting areas 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, wood, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electric heat and A/C. Electricity for heating and power: b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. no s' c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal.? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, i any: Thermal pane glass in storefronts — thick insulation in alls (R-19) and ceilings (R-30) 7. Environmental Health ._ a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. no 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. F.ire; department, ' ambulance and police 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: 1 I Fire exinguishers b. Noise 1) What types of noise . exist in the areas which may affect your project (for . example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Traffic 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with th project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Short term construction noise (7AM — 5PM) . No significa 't long term noise other than vehicle traffic entering site. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or. Control noise impacts, if any: none since so minimal .8. Land and Shoreline Use • a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? site currently unused b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. no ti ' I • -6- I, . r � c. Describe any structures on the site. none d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? no e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? B-1 ;! f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? I, Business district g. If applicable, .what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A • h. Has any 'part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. no • i. Approximately how many people would reside or work In the completed project?I I_}o l2.: persons j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? none k. Proposed measures to,avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: N/A 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: low rise development will blend in with neighborhood • 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. N/A • b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. j' N/A • c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: N/A 1 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building muterial(s) proposed. 26 feet is tallest poi'nt — stucco • b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? none c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Buildings will be painted subdued colors . j, 11. Light and Glare ti • -7- • a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? none b. Could, light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? no c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? none d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: none I 12. Recreation.. a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? none known • b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. no - c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: none 13,. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. no b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, , scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. none c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: • none • • • i -8- 1 14. Transportation . a. Identify public .streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed 1, • access to the existing street system. Show oh site plans, if any. , i; Access off S.E. Renton/Issaquah Rd. (Sunset Blvd. ) , 1! ' b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? 1 yes i; c. ' How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would . the project eliminate? . 53 provided. None eliminated i, d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or Improvements to existing 1' roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate • whether public or,private? . i no e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. . no ' f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. • i Approx. 10 '0trips per day during business hours g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: I, • none f . 15. Public Services • a. Would the project result in an' increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. . 1 . ; Minimal increase in need for fire protective service arid ,i police protection :V b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any Property will be fenced for security. Fire detection devices will be provided . 1, 16. Utilities � a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: ectricit ,6iatural gasp water, • use servi ,. elephone (sanitary sewe septic system, other. ,� . b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Telephone - Pacific N.W. -Bell 1 Electricity -Puget Power , • ' Water .- Renton Public,,:Works ,Dept. . . • . 1 Sewer - ,Renton`Public Works Dept ' . -9- I I I C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of • y knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the 1-ad agen,y may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it migh ' ue `, r9 fiance upo this checklist should there be any ,I willful misrepresentation or r illfu41:11 dis osure on my part. 1 Proponent: Name Printed: • ,! '1 I1 i1 '1 !I I I I S l , I .1 II • I II it it I ` II -10- D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (This sheet should only be used for actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs. Do not use this sheet for project actions.) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them In conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. • When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of • activities Iikely to result 'from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. Flow would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: • 12. Flow would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? • Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? • I I Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: 4. Flow would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic o'r cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? • Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: ' f i j,5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether t would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? • • • • • • . I i I ` t ' i -11- • • Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: • 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: 7. . Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of Iron-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: • Name Printed: • • • • • • • . I i . _ I • i I • • MINI- I MAP- j I . ) . • I I XI41fIMGI • _ : • • -aTo veGW corivrharpN f 1 .. .., —- - rrorttQJasncc}.trr 1 • .._._2ED !LJ t I � :� .� I 10 i.' 2. - ' MuILTI-FAMILY HoLY7 c, ,\� / . / • . • •�XfiTING 111 _____I. • y / 1 ExISr 1 I • it • I '- /•�'� P.LpI1eT5�15 "il•b'Pll•�n G-ENr�R • / / .- / EwSTING1 , . ' a /1 LaiL 1 1 /,. a I I z .t>-I %/ OP �b_I41? Q 0 -I ' 1— •I i [ r _ ... . . . . tIiiH -1 Imo.—.- _— • 1 • �j•.„ NoK•TI h.f�.. r,..,,,v.• 3 I sr : 4 q IMiF''Y ■ i..R I pq, �y I - 5 x III. \ ail V SitC •, ! ; F : : n, . . x AdUA Ij +4 .• I.•rt..; T . . r -21 , i?SMmK I. r�'"ZIT — ,Y•, 7 �t®� „ Y All R I • • V .T" � i u.um,x�� ;LA wm�`1T : I 1.% 111)152E • :� 'GEL a: • 'a I. . . n• iI '•a • II }. 1 i. _ .� t a.KO Jilln. ' I +',.cm.R. : .aI i I yam, t.111 "T r "I a R ',. • I. _li L._.. • yi_,._ .. Nr:..-• .--...._IT. kl. ri 11 I ..t.1 .I", .I.. IN ' SITE • • . -J I • VI G 1 q 1 ' .MAP• . P-�N�roNG D VfSj VISION . "IYpENENTON I 1 ' APR 191990 1 ' ,Citl H • I. O.A. .� — I 1 : I ; I G..1.•�v; �.v/., e-s/M Pooh P4'—ir 7V M.4T«/Di1�C "'p '.4 /?,�F 4 W/7-I 5—4,-,i9 f—/Y 7Z �[r vs7—.rs., �. - • 1 • 7/ /M A,feON: 77JP"4.t?p5th '/JL•'Tie/i- B.4-r. 5/7- 5,_/-77'Y/- • U5E ea,c5. L/6f-/7- /'xiz—q E O.� �'M(/G/!T� . 1a.=^Z. i \• �I" •�,. I ' 7�/M Hc�.4rfOv..10 /JET 'V/N/T� S/7'_5. �Erl. kA • . 9 /rl -i-MF'7- o-ct7� / —�^!U oFl.�[t s, P4/i\/-TDr° -* z30PG2*= ' ' • r'oGOSS (, i-i--c• l-f41,,c; 3e"/�fj V!`IHD Wh//7 "P.-6-/'y7-- -/n!/y`-f /NN-G� S'+, f;4.,,,,, uvp 5T(/cGo g/�!/ `4✓i4/-'D,•�//-//Tim ' -/)T-P/'1l. / - -- - ser F4-SF2/« . y ..5'3-M7tK-S'6�6�f1'B/N ''/Z �//r✓F,E -7-M,'N �'S • . i .. I p.•tr•v>-To M.1}7-ci-/P.4.P/� 4 P'�S/i4�/ Su�E' _ • • Ft.LL% /LG.(iM/AL...Tip�/6N'7 i, .S%O.F11J,:w., j G/1.M P<ti/./T T27 rv/i4>z'-,/',AL.,'✓.aH0 W,v/T.� ( . Z///�"0..4 Avro. /✓1/}/r.L L,. . SN.4. O eP•9r•v T)�73oM F�.til5 /4 f-4 $OTTOn9 70 ,...-5,,,ill a G 4 /4/ A7-7a' 7/� !a-. .Ori>-G,,,, P.4,--.t7-7a n—'ii r-✓--/ P.c¢.zsi!t`r e,/- '• YI` v F-ANAL F-3.6 PR/../7T0 7 ' M/arr-/ y /z�'�N B' t ; CG H I 0- H Nil/A Y rs"AV. .4-9 P.s-,..7 7 t -, -/:A/-1✓.1,-ia '✓/"/,f I ! .:\ 0, `�` D� �� a — / ¢�on..4YG Gr�S P4, .lT -—+_'•Aeo .No•1.:{'.!- r.. 1 1 1 Z � �' • - 1n411 \I "i -..-• _ Tt--' ,. /-10 , :prp'Rose'6oh//=., . VZ.7Aii r. .e`✓T-->eE:�-'/!./ - �T r/ x P.r- -' - "li '� ...__.-. __—___ O./`a'^-l-ONiGY%e„ STUceo Pi.J/5-,'P/Fi,./7z-C.,7 /W 4:c„,,4,44 v:9ri0 ✓///7 /!.... '=iN/ / 11 !- S - SL/NC'5 P.' may"�P.Li-rignLG, P-�i'4' SG7.4a"�D t—r, .. MT-7— Tz-- 7743-- I • li /in/.a�/iyr, W/-!/7 " ,�4:'.—!./>./c,irO�NO- - I ir) C . :!off . • {, P!P_ 7NPo n, - j. ' __ _ —P/ �/S: ';/r_T.l0•/.�:_/ 'S/rv! ':,�= M..J c„ ;:..-- ,. /:;A,,'.cr�n,.�/--//,,. s/2°� .1;:�.x. 1 - — / - --•- 5Y•..CIa li//.,`,J c:-,'..'!'L/, , - -.�-f lA-./.-. ..-- - Pf - 5'!'lx.".J, r � • / .v� ; ,i I .;Z"�- c_.p'p. 0.5`3. ?4r. -va /vmt/^'f.s- :_!-/r-� : 34 zJitr a.ss� y/GJ5/6'.!.-yi (4 izi�e-- /c/'% i:^ r/"./ -\:il_rr :A-7//-lam?/'We I)es . - �s,e : ' ' I f � � �: ; ' . • � I. I . I c: i 79, 7,4rl lh/ z=c%r �Cx--¢'—.�"' o,�-- ,ram - . - - . • Ma Maim x na rmaremir ---' oftMm:ieur Ka,.rank: Northwest Neon & Plastic __ LG�/ /O V v✓ 16.,.,/P1- • /��rl•�/r r -V�'l7Uh/ - AmMKL'Aa„,.xoa.u�om.. sls-inn stix« exx-ix00 •M-M..M � ii90NlG DIVISION...!.. .k.me m[xmmtM. •Kirkland.Wn.98033 MASI%Me•: OF RE{ -Oil • G f ' �� l /nG' 7i/ l•9- -� os rre�✓H xf :won..ny5ersrgrcwY erare-uvc oes cx o 7Z - /GNT/7`/-'6+'.! FY/LL/ GLUM/NA i9a=,-//G•S 7 � TAtV - -IV /4 • • • DATE ' ICT APPROVAL I�(f-'dMt xEV6[0 • � � • _ _ _ .. . _ __ . __ _ ._ . .... _ _ _ _ . _t • „.=„ ., . •f • Christopher Brown 0 Associates 879 Rainier Avenue N., Suite A-201 Renton, WA 98055-1380 (206) 772-1188 Fax 772-4321 • .I CHRIS C. LEADY • Commercial Site On Sunset Boulevard S.E. Between Duvall and Anacortes Avenues N.E. Renton King County Traffic Study March 29, �l-1 `0�G DIVISION : AO'� ;. : CITY OF 4�ENTON K g'1 1 1990 ` �f- r _i E E d �D ;14 '•^. a • • Traffic Engineers 0 Transportation Planners CHRIS C. LEADY Commercial Site Traffic Study TABLE OF CONTENTS Purpose 1 . Location and Land Use 1 . Access 3 . Traffic Data 3 . Transit 3 . Adjacent Land Uses 5 . Background Traffic 5 . Trip Generation 5 . Traffic Assignment 6 . Horizon Year Volumes 7 . Levels of Service 7 . Accidents 11 . Discussion 11 . Recommendations 12 . LIST OF FIGURES 1 . Vicinity Map 2 . 2 . Current Traffic Volumes 4. 3 . Trip Distribution as a % of Peak Hour 7 . 4 . Horizon Year Traffic Volume With Project 8 . LIST OF TABLES I Trip Generation 5 . II Trip Generation-Total Site 6 . III Net Generation, On System 6 . IV Levels of Service Definitions 9 . V Levels of Service 10 . APPENDIX Capacity Calculations Ct Chri8topher brown e A6sociate� 879 Rainier Avenue N., Suite A-201 Renton, WA 98055-1380 (206) 772-1188 CHRIS C. LEADY 1 I Commercial Site . 1 On Sunset Boulevard S.E. 1 1 Between Duvall and Anacortes Avenues N.E. I . Renton 1 1 Traffic Study 1 Purpose • . . .. _ , - . The-;purpose of this -study was to gather a data base of .current traffic operations on" the .adjacent arterial road serving a proposed suburban commercial retail site and, as a part.:of the background issues related to the project, to also include an • " adjacent mini-storage facility being -developed by others (likely in the sameltime frame) . The study is to define the expected . peak hour trip generation characteristics. of this project (and 1- the adjacent mini-storage project>, the expected horizon year traffic demands, in this case the _1990 traffic demands, 'to _ quantify the horizon year levelsof service (LOS) at the . driveways serving the site'and the key adjacent intersections, and to comment on driveway design requirements with respect to location on the arterial system. Location and Land Use 1 • : 1 The proposed commercial site is -situated- between Duvall Avenue . to the east of the site and Anacortes Avenue to'-the west . . slightly west of the mid point of the block, on -Sunset Boulevard is _ S.E. , in theCity of Renton. It is shown in the Vicinity Map, - page- 2. I - Both of the sites, the proposed commercial and the adjacent • mini-storage site are presently vacant. However, other retail- commercial enterprises are located to the east including. a gas ! - station and mini mart and, immediately next: to the subject site, is a lumber yard. To the south, across -Sunset Boulevard, :is a I . neighborhood shopping center with=an :Albertsons store and a Pay 1 'n Save. and Earnst Malmo hardware/garden store. Close by on : Anacortes Avenue is a McDonalds and south of that a Kindercare child care: center. Christopher Brown Ccs AmocialC8 4 - 879 Rainier Avenue N., 8uiLe'A-201 _ Renton. WA 98055-1380 1 . (206) 772-1188 i ., TIDST t; n' 1..... SSE 1 ST > �.•5 [,l�� ✓ 1i � / TiEo15TST • . • 'Fl ::~.'•• "` .,L.^. • AFi� Sf giF S� •' .�/V 9 T ` ' f f 2 ..; < s MP — 'may. ►'4LL ,E^ _ N \� .E ` - • St 8E HPi La: 1 • l • 1\ _ • _tau 7 toy C 2 > 1 -' -W y�u� �+ Tr SE STAR✓ Z i t _ w! - `� • —�� - r < t 'c;utlrrs "r• HSl `..E. lA^TN, ST v I E, $Egi f HE 1 s.tH 1 S� - - a SE 1=.1TH >r R . ti . 8. ,,, '.... . 101ST • -.II. .' E. , • �•TN • • T . t \ si7N 'i s .r; _ N r. Z 0 ZpI, to c 5 ` . • +. >t < .41'`_ Q4Tli ST �: rL .e• ,r 1 • .iTN T - I' sT u SE 11_T ... H 1 it 16 C W W NE In ST 1 [4` 4 3 2 >EIfDTH SE 10(TH li 1 '�PZ W > NE MTH ST (� 1 1- 4 I ` , - L� > Z NE 1�TH 2 �E T \,G4 N NE Z W I • > `f��µ r` -ST• Z�a r� ,e• _ E i - S- a+'`` a < ,. . :,o': a Z �m <j PAR, namf Z �', • 1 c° �--- _ ¢ �TbTF RA •7ti. tts•>R —Z N>�ns T,`• j' c 1 Hi• s 1�TM T�' t Bah C� .. >___ O < • 6, z r I Ig.> o .::PiGO.� o z o t6T. < 1 1 �NEjJ>ISlCh 57 F r f r ill, �: j O' w >c �Iji 44 zi y > • ,.. 2-11.1 > W'J W NE>: ¢i3 Nt, t�Th �T > �` • �' Z <1 l Ni 3TH Si ? i �`7?` �,,DfF.7 D V: . NE 17TH " 6 3T ■ 131H• L/E 1 !LICENSING 2.+ o~c I. v, > ,n GJ}. „� NE j171H � 'S, ST <Z Oi p < a " �+1 j �: 1,. > -E! NE P.• • 2:- V r , <.... 0=0 z ---' ,SE. 112TH • c 4, .P. z z g+ j Z r1 ql4/( i •.•.e PO 1�C2' NE 11Th Tr--- > i NE NE tTHt ti • = < 1 ,. OUVER PA ST , oR , •W>¢I :�' �'` E NE 11Th r <i 1i7H C? � t1T � S,/ I OLIVE Z ¢<. t` `.` =I NE ieTh F: 5T M� T. 4 i Y WI I j i NS •E 1 I4 W < NE 10Th _ 0'n �\ g z -1 NE inn. 1 P 1 i ai 0 1 I r'.. QC1 `e9.''? _ piE.RCE ��CTI C1 t/ w ti`- 1GTn 1ST Or� cl NE ►1E 1GTh LN �E a>— NE 1 TH<sT I __-..-1 to< 'tj"� tizl < Z H, <7 < < . Y'o =;SE .116TH ST NE 9ThPL•� < .•1 > c a S .CC 4, -- •- - - .-�1E- --air,- -� — _ _ Can. v. • / 9Th ST l ST - i W C <--e a -I 11ETM T> . , -NE eTHP� �`�aEy�� a � .Z '�M�' r, :'•�;s'. <.� —Fr,. 1,-., ST (U • E BTy .•d: .'F.' F: Syr J 7 J w I gF•r > 0 S� > ..c.aa,, r t•\ c. 9 , 0 a 7` NE BIN C > k •'�� is , • �'r .x::•;^.;: U �r fth. s7 �- I L_SE _1 TH Si ® f E r•H , ,, y�Z NE 4 NE i NE - � " �::. , a'�,,: x >• TTh E 171157. ST W t 7 > � 4. O•. < i > ST qt f ¢.h Cr' z NE 'Ftµ PG NE 7TM ycf�Rc D I ...• �E Fri-. Cl hD ST \ • 1 \\ Thy/- W Ipet tl— ' -1: 'n • FIGURE 1 Vicinity Map ristopher a � page 2 •• // 879Ch Rainier flvenueBrown N.fl��oc, e5uite tefl 201 1?enton, WA 98055-1380 (206) 772-1188 . . As planned at the moment, the' commercial sector has some 10, 500 g..s. f. leasable space and will have parking for 55 vehicles . To the northeast,' on an adjacent property, there will- be a mini- • warehouse with some 65, 000 g.s. f. of rentable space. . Access ' : , . � . . . Access to both sites will be from two existing driveways. The east.erly •driveway, .primarily, serving the mini-warehouse site, is:: - on the boundary of the site with the second one, - serving the commercial sector, being 170 feet to the west close to the middle of the site.' Anacortes Avenue, an off set intersection, .: V - has its southern leg about 180 feet beyond this main driveway : _ while the northern leg of -Anacortes Avenue is a further 300 feet ' . • to the west.. . • : . Sunset Boulevard has a five lane section across- the entire site • . frontage with .the center two-way left turn lane serving both' - driveways without any intervening interruptions. As a mid-block • . - - - property, the five lane section. provides -assess to the facility - . with the center .lane eliminating delay to eastbound through V ' •vehicles as _well as providing. a substantial margin' of .safety by. : : eliminating rear end. type accidents to this group of vehicles . - Traffic Data Current peak hour and derived average weekday traffic volume - : data was obtained from manual intersection peak hour turning movement data collected in mid-March, 199D under fair weather conditions. : The data are shown on Figure 2, Current Traffic - Volumes . = _ . As noted in the capacity computations in the Appendix, the' truck . • : percentage has been set at one (2) percent. BusI_ traffic did not impede operations at _the intersection or along this route. - • - Transit - V V - • = - In terms of .the proposed project, transit is not a: delimiting - factor. for trip generation. It was observed that pedestrian - - - demands across the intersection at' Duvall Avenue were transit _ - related. For .the most part, these were :oriented to the newly - built "Honey Creek Apartments" . , . Christopher Brown Asoci _ � ,Les� • 879 Rainier Avenue N., Suite A-201 • Denton, WA 980551380. • • (206) 7721188 1 ,sz)i -N Anacortes Avenue N .E . I ® Q I r-- I , 0 I N / . c._, ______ ' Driveway to m 4 Commercial Site O p w _ rt O N o b C. LEGEND 1N m r O Driveway to 411110 A .W . D . T . C w n ° Mini Storage Site Design Hour Q x x Traffic Volumes (PM Peak Hour ) O N o 2).....s----'/) Duvall Avenue S . E . -T 4 V q (QR) , 1 I FIGURE 2 1 Current Traffic Volumes (March , 1990) I Christopher brown Associates page 4 � � 1 879 Rainier Avenue N., eSuiLe A-201 \\,,.. Renton, WA 98055-1380 (206) 772-1188 ....--! ' I Adiacent Land Uses Adjacent land uses include the previously noted neighborhood shopping center to the south, across Sunset Boulevard, and the lumber yard followed by the mini-mart lying to the east at the intersection of Duvall Avenue and Sunset Boulevard. To the north of the site, the land uses tend to residential . A mixed use facility is planned immediately to the west of the site. Background Traffic Background traffic, normally used to take into account the overall growth in traffic demand apart from that produced by the' subject development, has not been factored into this project since the build out is to be within the 1990 calender year. Essentially, the horizon year for this project is assumed to be in the 1990 . Trip Generation The trip generation data for the project is derived on the basis of the published data of the Institute of Transportation Engineers ' ( I .T.E. ) under Land Use Code 820 which applies to shopping centers and Land Use Code 151 for mini storage facilities . The data is noted below in Table I . TABLE I Trip Generation Time/Direction ITE Code 820 ITE Code 151 A.W.D.T. 1 , 717 155 trips/day P.M. Peak, IN 95 8 trips/hour P.M. Peak, OUT 98 7 trips/hour Christopher Brown tlssdciates� 879 Rainier Avenue N., &lite A-201 -5_ C.4 Renton, WA 98055-1380 (206) 772-1188 Combining both sectors, the total site traffic generation is derived, as shown in Table II, below. TABLE II Trip Generation, Total Site Time Interval Volume A.W.D.T. * 1 , 872 vehicles per day P.M. Inbound 103 vehicles per hour P.M. Outbound 105 vehicles per hour However, in accordance with published data, 44 . 9 percent of the demand at the commercial site will come from the existing traffic stream with the mini storage site ' s demand being a primary trip and amounting to new traffic (Trip Generation, 4th Edition, ) so that new traffic added to the system will be somewhat less than the data of Table II . The new traffic added to the system will be as follows . TABLE III Net Trip Generation, On System Time Interval Volume A.W.D.T. * 926 vehicles per day P.M. Inbound 51 vehicles per hour P.M. Outbound 51 vehicles per hour Traffic Assignment Site generated traffic is assigned to the network on the basis of current traffic distribution patterns on the south side of Sunset Boulevard at Anacortes Avenue N.E. since the majority of traffic will be derived from the same traffic stream. The project' s traffic distribution, as a percent of all site traffic, is described in Figure 3 . Chri8topher Brown Amociates� _ ; 879 Rainier Avenue N., &lite A-201 _6 Renton, WA 98055-1380 (206) 772-1188 • co 0 Cji Sunset Boulevard FIGURE 3 Trip Distribution as a Percent of Peak Hour Trips Horizon Year Volumes As noted earlier, the horizon year for this project is assumed to be 1990 . The data of Figure 4 describes the driveway and intersection traffic volumes with full site development. The data of Figure 4 is used for the level of service (LOS) analysis and assumes full ann unrestrained turning movement opportunities at the driveways . These driveways can function with all movements unless heavy queuing from the Duvall Avenue signal, back to the west, precludes them. With judicial signal timing, this can be negated. Levels of Service The Level of Service (LOS) describes the quality of traffic flow. This ranges from the best or highest level, 'A' , usually denoted by an ability to select ones ' own speed or the ability to change lanes or overtake at will, down to the • Christopher Brown 0 Associates -7- 879 Rainier Avenue N., (Suite 'A-201 Renton, WA 98055-1380 (206) 772-1188 111111 Qz) 0 , s w Anacortes Avenue N .E . .._.) 1 1 1 i I 'CZ')w N a C , \�� Driveway to m Commercial Site (h m N N , \ 0 LEGEND G 1 � I Driveway to X>CM A .W .D . T . c n Mini Storage Site. Design Hour l x 7_ Traffic Volumestil 1 (PM Peak Hour ) I ) 1-....... i `b 1 1 �� 2C� Duvall Avenue S .E . . 0,, (/,,-.1 , N o CO FIGURE 4 Horizon Year Traffic Volumes With Project Christopher Brown 0 Associates ° 879 Rainier Avenue N., suite A-201 page 8 *1 Renlon, WA 980551380 } (206) 772-1188 Ili/ I lowest of worst level 'F ' . This LOS is the lowest possible level and is one where traffic is severely constrained. It is usually denoted by "jam" conditions and attendant long traffic delays . As a measure of intersection delay, it is described in terms the stopped delay each vehicle is expected to encounter at signalized intersections and in terms of both reserve capacity as well as expected delay at non-signalized intersections. These are shown below in Table IV. TABLE IV Level of Service Definitions Signalized intersections Level of Service Delay Per Vehicle (Seconds) A Under 5 seconds B 5 . 1 - 15 . 0 seconds C 15 . 1 - 25 . 0 seconds D 25 . 1 - 40 . 0 seconds E 40 . 1 - 60 . 0 seconds F Greater than 60 sec. Unsignalized intersections Level of Service Reserve Capacity Expected Delay A 400 or more Little or none B 300 to 399 Short delays C 200 to 299 Average delays D 100 to 199 Long delays E 0 to 99 Very long delays F none failure, extreme congestion Capacity computations were performed in accordance with Special ; Report 209, the Highway Capacity Manual, using the computer program CAPCALC 85, Version 2 . 2 published by Roger Creighton and Associates and licensed to this firm. The "Operations and Design" method, more rigorous than the "Planning" method, is used for signalized intersections . STOP sign controlled Chri8topher Drown As8ociate8 -9- 879 Rainier Avenue N., e3uitei t1-201 Denton, WA 98055-1380 (206) 772-1188 4111 I intersections used parameters for arterial roads with speeds 1 under 35 m.p.h. As noted earlier, all input data is listed in the appendix, along with computer output. When reviewing the appended computer data, it may be noted that i each set of data has its ' own file reference number. This is located at the top right of each data sheet. The title and other descriptive material is on the upper left corner. Levels of service for the horizon year traffic with the project j in place are shown in Table V, below. TABLE V Levels of Service Weekday P.M. Peak Intersection Horizon Year w/site 1 On Sunset On Driveway Sunset Boulevard/Commercial Drive A E* Sunset Boulevard/Mini-storage Drive A E* * Left turn only, worst case On Anacortes 1 Sunset Boulevard/Anacortes A E* W.B. left turn to Anacortes D i Signalized LOS, Overall Sunset Boulevard/Duvall Avenue D The low levels of service on the two driveway at the site noted in the above table apply to only the outbound left turn movements onto Sunset Boulevard. This is because these LOS values do not assume the use of the two way, left turn lane as a refuge-merge lane. Accordingly, this is a worst case representation. In actual fact, the two-way, left turn lane will function as a refuge-merge lane and the LOS will be in the ' C' range for the commercial driveway and 'A' range at the mini storage. Christopher Brown Assoiciates� -1 0- 879 Rainier Avenue N., &lite A-201 Renton, WA 98055-1380 / (206) 772-1188 4 • 41111 4 Accidents According to city records, there were at the intersections of: ' Sunset Boulevard/Anacortes 23 accidents Sunset Boulevard/Duvall 27 accidents and in the block between these two intersections: Mid-block on Sunset Boulevard 11 accidents over the last four years . At Anacortes Avenue, of the 23 accidents, 19 were right angle types . This is to be expected given the unsignalized nature of the intersection. The accident rates at the two intersections were: Sunset Boulevard/Anacortes 1 . 08/MEV Sunset Boulevard/Duvall 1 . 01 /MEV With very low accident rates, it appears from a general sense that accident causation or culpability does not appear to be associated with the system operation, per se, although the four year frequency is somewhat high. Discussion With a five lane arterial serving the site, complete with curbs, gutter, nighttime illumination and also with a center two-way, left turn lane, and with a low accident rate by most urban standards', it appears that from a traffic operations viewpoint the project can be safely and efficiently accommodated at the site. The levels of service are satisfactory by normal standards that would be applicable. There are no sight distance restrictions, no adverse grades, no , heavy pedestrian traffic flows nor other features or factors that can delimit the use of the site in its proposed mode. In view of the foregoing, there are no suggested mitigating measures; none are warranted given the adequate LOS and historical accident record. (While not a function of this project study, the city may wish to review its current signal phase sequence and timing at the Duvall/Sunset signal in the p.m. peak hour to address the eastbound left turn queue. ) Christopher Brown Associates\ -11 - €04) 879 Rainier Avenue N., Suite A-201 Renton, WA 98055-1380 (206) 772-1188 lib . i Recommendations , - I . Since the attendant increase in traffic volume as a consequence of -the proposed action (including the adjacent mini-storage project) is marginal, since there is no change in. the LOS as a result of or due to the project, since the driveway traffic volumes are relatively minor and that the . two driveways providing access to the site will continue to have adequate levels of service, and since the accident 1 . - history is not significant and not expected. to change as a result of the proposed use, the only major concern will reside with the_ outbound left-turn movements• to the arterial 1 street (Sunset Boulevard) : However, with a center two-way, left turn lane in place that can .function as a refuge-merge _ 1 lane, no remedial mitigation •measures are appropriate. The • . existing arterial infrastructure is suited. to accommodate _ this project. . ;. • • Christopher Brown a Assocjates�- -1 2- - 879 Rainier Avenue N., Suite A-201 . Renton. WA 98055-1380 (206)-772-1188 _ CHRIS C. LEADY Commercial Site On Sunset Boulevard S.E. Between Duvall and Anacortes Avenues N.E. Renton APPENDIX Capacity Computations File No. Intersection Page LEADY01 Sunset Boulevard/Commercial Drive 1 LEADY02 Sunset Boulevard/Mini-storage Drive 3 LEADY03 Sunset Boulevard/Anacortes Avenue 5 LEADY04 Sunset Boulevard/Duvall Avenue 7 Analyses with 2-way left turn lane as merge-refuge lane. LEADY11 Sunset Boulevard/Commercial Drive 11 LEADY22 Sunset Boulevard/Mini-storage Drive 13 C CHRISTOPHER BROWN 3/28/1990 CHRIS LEADY COMMERCIAL LEADY01 INTERSECTION : SUNSET BOULEVARD @ SUNSET BOULEVARD @ COMMERCIAL DRIVE AVERAGE P.M. 1990 CBD?N UNSIGNALIZED - MAJOR STREET RUNS EAST / WEST TRAFFIC & ROADWAY CONDITIONS GRADE HV ADJ. PKG LN. BUSES CONF. PEDS PED BUTTON ARR APP (%) (%) Y/N Nm (Nb) PHF (peds/hr) Y/N SEC1 TYPE --- --- ---- ---- ---- EB 0 2 N 0 0 0 .95 0 N 0 . 01 3 WB 0 2 N 0 0 0 . 85 0 N 0 . 0 3 SB 0 0 N 0 0 0 .80 0 N 0 . 0 3 GEOMETRICS / VOLUMES LANE GROUPS VOLUME 1 2 3 APP LT TH RT MVM LNS WD MVM LNS WD MVM LNS WD I ' EB 82 1095 0 L 1 12 . 0 T 2 24. 0 WB 0 521 13 TR 2 24 . 0 SB 52 0 46 L 1 10 . 0 R 1 10 . 0 All 411 CHRISTOPHER BROWN 3 ' 28-/1990 CHRIS LEADY COMMERCIAL LEADY01 INTERSECTION : SUNSET BOULEVARD @ SUNSET BOULEVARD @ COMMERCIAL DRIVE AVERAGE P.M. 1990 CBD?N UNSIGNALIZED - MAJOR STREET RUNS EAST / WEST UNSIGNALIZED CRITICAL GAPS CRITICAL GAPS (SEC) APP LEFT TURN THROUGH RIGHT TURN EB 5 . 50 --- --- WB --- --- --- SB 7 . 00 --- 5 .50 VOLUME ALLOCATION TO LANES LANE 1 LANE 2 LANE 3 APP L T R L T R L T R EB 82 0 0 0 547 0 0 548 0 F WB 0 267 0 0 254 13 0 0 0., SB 52 0 0 0 0 46 0 0 0 UNSIGNALIZED Ij APP LANE 1 LANE 2 LANE 3 EB RESERVE CAPACITY 512 --- --- LEVEL OF SERVICE A WB RESERVE CAPACITY --- --- --- LEVEL OF SERVICE SB RESERVE CAPACITY 1 776 --- LEVEL {S OF SERVICE E A MAJOR STREET - EB/WB 6 4111• • CHRISTOPHER BROWN 3/i 8/1990 CHRIS LEADY COMMERCIAL LEADY02 INTERSECTION : SUNSET BOULEVARD @ SUNSET BOULEVARD @ MINISTORAGE DRIVE AVERAGE P.M. 1990 CBD?N UNSIGNALIZED - MAJOR STREET RUNS EAST / WEST TRAFFIC & ROADWAY CONDITIONS GRADE HV ADJ. PKG LN. BUSES CONF. PEDS PED BUTTON ARR APP (%) (%) Y/N Nm (Nb) PHF (peds/hr) Y/N SEC TYPE EB 0 2 N 0 0 0 .95 0 N 0 . 0 3 WB 0 2 N 0 0 0 .85 0 N 0 . 0 3 SB 0 0 N 0 0 0 .80 0 N 0 . 0 ! 3 GEOMETRICS / VOLUMES LANE GROUPS VOLUME 1 2 3 APP LT TH RT MVM LNS WD MVM LNS WD MVM LNS WD EB 4 1143 0 L 1 12 . 0 T 2 24. 0 WB 0 531 4 TR 2 24. 0 SB 4 0 3 L 1 10 . 0 R 1 10 . 0 CHRISTOPHER BROWN 3/28/1990 . CHRIS LEADY COMMERCIAL LEADY02 INTERSECTION : SUNSET BOULEVARD. @ SUNSET BOULEVARD @ MINISTORAGE DRIVE AVERAGE P.M. 1990 CBD?N ' • ti UNSIGNALIZED — MAJOR STREET RUNS EAST / WEST i UNSIGNALIZED CRITICAL GAPS CRITICAL GAPS (SEC) APP LEFT TURN THROUGH RIGHT TURN • EB 5 . 50 --- --- WB --- --- --- SB 7 . 00 --- 5 . 50 . 1 ti VOLUME ALLOCATION- TO LANES i LANE 1 LANE 2 LANE 3 APP L • T R L T R L T R EB 4 0 0 0 571 0 0 572 0 1 WB 0 267 0 0 264 4 0 0 0 SB 4 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 • 0 i UNSIGNALIZED C APP LANE 1 LANE 2 LANE 3 EB RESERVE CAPACITY 591 --- --- LEVEL OF SERVICE A WB RESERVE CAPACITY --- --- --- LEVEL OF SERVICE a ' SB RESERVE CAPACITY 56 813 --- LEVEL OF SERVICE • E A MAJOR STREET — EB/WB I • lil 1 CHRISTOPHER BROWN 3/28/1990 CHRIS LEADY COMMERCIAL LEADY03 INTERSECTION : 1 ' SUNSET BOULEVARD @ SUNSET BOULEVARD @ ANACORTES @ ANACORTES AVERAGE P.M. 1990 CBD?N UNSIGNALIZED 1 1 - MAJOR STREET RUNS EAST / WEST 1 1 1 TRAFFIC & ROADWAY CONDITIONS GRADE HV ADJ. PKG LN. BUSES CONF. PEDS PED BUTTON ARR APP (%) (%) Y/N Nm (Nb) PHF (peds/hr) Y/N SEC1 TYPE EB 0 2 N 0 0 0.95 0 N 0 . 0 ' 3 WB 0 2 N 0 0 0 .85 0 N 0 . 0 3 NB 2 0 N 0 0 0 .83 0 N 0 . 0 3 SB -2 0 N 0 0 0 .80 0 N 0 . 0 3 GEOMETRICS / VOLUMES LANE GROUPS VOLUME 1 2 3 I APP LT TH RT MVM LNS WD MVM LNS WD MVM LIITS. WD EB 6 1143 142 L 1 12 . 0 TR 2 24. 0 WB 24 539 4 L 1 12 . 0 TR 2 24. 0 , NB 28. 0 32 LT 1 11 . 0 R 1 1.1 . 0 1 SB 2 0 0 LT 1 10 . 0 R 1 10 . 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I • 1 1 CHRISTOPHER BROWN 3/28/1990 CHRIS LEADY COMMERCIAL LEADY03 INTERSECTION : SUNSET BOULEVARD @ SUNSET BOULEVARD @ ANACORTES @ ANACORTES AVERAGE P.M. 1990 CBD?N UNSIGNALIZED - MAJOR STREET RUNS EAST / WEST UNSIGNALIZED CRITICAL GAPS CRITICAL GAPS (SEC) APP LEFT TURN THROUGH RIGHT TURN ' EB 5 . 50 --- --- WB 5 . 50 --- --- NB 7 . 00 6 . 50 5 . 50 SB 7 . 00 6 . 50 5 . 50 VOLUME ALLOCATION TO LANES LANE 1 LANE 2 LANE 3 APP L T R L T R L T R EB 6 0 0 0 642 0 0 501 142 WB 24 0 0 0 271 0 0 268 4 NB 28 0 0 0 0 32 0 0 0 SB 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 UNSIGNALIZED APP LANE 1 LANE 2 LANE 3 EB RESERVE CAPACITY 583 --- --- LEVEL OF SERVICE A WB RESERVE CAPACITY 196 --- --- LEVEL OF SERVICE D NB RESERVE CAPACITY 15 530 --- LEVEL OF SERVICE E A SB RESERVE CAPACITY 47 --- --- LEVEL OF SERVICE E • CHRISTOPHER BROWN 3/28/1990 CHRIS LEADY COMMERCIAL LEADY04 INTERSECTION : SUNSET BOULEVARD @ SUNSET BOULEVARD @ DUVALL AVENUE @ DUVALL AVENUE AVERAGE P.M. 1990 CBD?N ACTUATED SIGNAL TRAFFIC & ROADWAY CONDITIONS GRADE HV ADJ. PKG LN. BUSES CONF. PEDS PED BUTTON ARR APP (%) (%) Y/N Nm (Nb) PHF (peds/hr) Y/N SEC TYPE EB 0 2 N 0 0 0 .95 12 Y 18 . 0 3 WB 0 2 N 0 0 0 . 85 12 Y 18 . 0 3 NB 2 0 N 0 0 0 .83 10 Y 18 . 0 3 SB -2 0 N 0 0 0 .80 10 Y 18 . 0 3 GEOMETRICS / VOLUMES LANE GROUPS VOLUME 1 2 3 APP LT TH RT MVM LNS WD MVM LNS WD MVM LNS WD EB 408 637 101 L 1 12 . 0 TR 2 24. 0 WB 47 262 48 L 1 12 . 0 TR 2 24. 0 NB 69 268 53 L 1 12 . 0 TR 2 24 . 0 SB 70 372 284 L 1 12 . 0 TR 2 24 . 0 SIGNAL PHASING APP PHASE 1ST MV 2ND MV 3RD MV PROT PMSV G Y+R --- ---- ---- -- --- EB 1 TR R 20 80 EB 2 L TR L R 15 85 EB 6 L L 15 85 WB 1 TR R 20 80 WB 6 L L 15 85 WB 3 L TR LR 10 90 NB 4 L L 15 ' 85 NB 5 TR R 20 80 SB 4 L L 15 85 SB 5 TR R 20 80 SB 7 L TR LR 5 95 • 3/28/1990 CHRISTOPHER BROWN INTERSECTION LEADY04 N W -+- E S SB TOTAL DUVALL AVENUE A 48 726 N/S STREET WB TOTAL 262 357 < ' ` > < 284 70 47 v 372 2 1 SUNSET BOULEVARD E/W STREET <*[ v *> A <*-- 2 *--- 1 v A \/ 1 ---* 2 --*> v <* A *> SUNSET BOULEVARD E/W STREET 1 2 268 A 408 A 69 53 EB TOTAL 1146 637 > DUVALL AVENUE 1 N/S STREET NB TOTAL I 101 390 v 1 PAGE 1 CHRISTOPHER BROWN 3/28/1990 CHRIS LEADY COMMERCIAL LEADY04 INTERSECTION : I SUNSET BOULEVARD @ SUNSET BOULEVARD @ DUVALL AVENUE @ DUVALL AVENUE AVERAGE P .M. 1990 CBD ? N ACTUATED SIGNAL VOLUME ADJUSTMENT APPROACH LANE GROUP FLOW RATE LANE UTIL ADJ FLOW PROP OF TURNS MVM VOLUME IN GROUP FACTOR RATE LT IT --- ---- ---- ---- EB L 408 429 1 . 00 429 1 . 00 0100 TR 738 777 1 . 00 777 0 . 00 014 WB L 47 55 1 . 00 55 1 . 00 0 . 00 TR 310 365 1 . 00 365 0 . 00 0115 NB L 69 83 1 . 00 83 1 . 00 0100 TR 321 387 1 . 00 387 0 . 00 017 SB L 70 87 1 . 00 87 1 . 00 0 . 00 TR 656 820 1 . 00 820 0 . 00 0143 SATURATION FLOW IDEAL # OF ADJUSTMENT FACTORS ADJ. APP MVM SAT FLOW LANES WIDTH H.V. GRADE PARK BUS AREA RT LT FLOW ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- EB L 1800 1 1 . 00 0 . 99 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 0 . 95 1693 TR 1800 2 1 . 00 0 . 99 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 0 .98 1 . 00 3493 WB L 1800 1 1 . 00 0 . 99 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 0 . 5 ! 1693 TR 1800 2 1 . 00 0 . 99 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 0 . 98 1 . 00 3493 NB L 1800 1 1 . 00 1 . 00 0 . 99 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 0 . 95 1693 TR 1800 2 1 . 00 1 . 00 0 . 99 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 0 . 97 1 . 00 3457 SB L 1800 1 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 01 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 0 . 95 1727 TR 1800 2 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 01 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 0 .93 1 . 00 , 3381 I • PAGE 2 CHRISTOPHER BROWN 328/199.0 CHRIS LEADY COMMERCIAL , LEADY04 INTERSECTION : I SUNSET BOULEVARD @ , SUNSET BOULEVARD @ 1 DUVALL AVENUE @ DUVALL AVENUE I AVERAGE P.M. 1990 CBD ? N ACTUATED SIGNAL 1 1 CAPACITY ANALYSIS LN GR ADJ FLOW PMSV ADJ SAT FLOW GREEN LN GR V/C APP MVM RATE LT FLOW FLW RT RATIO CRIT ? RATIO CAPACITY RATIO EB L 429 0 1693 0 .253 Y 0 . 300 508 � . 844 TR 777 0 3493 0 . 222 N 0 . 350 1223 0 . 635 WB L 53 2 1693 0 . 031 N 0 . 150 254 0 . 209 TR 365 0 3493 0 . 104 Y 0 . 300 1048 0 . 348 NB L 83 0 1693 0 . 049 Y 0 . 150 254 0 . 327 TR 387 0 3457 0 . 112 N 0 . 200 691 0 . 560 SB L 36 51 1727 0 . 021 N 0 . 150 259 0 . 139 TR 820 0 3381 0 . 243 Y 0 . 250 845 0 . 970 CYCLE LENGTH : 1,00 . 0 SUM OF CRITICAL LANES' FLOW RATIOS : 0 . 649 LOSS TIME PER CYCLE : 21 INTERSECTION V/C : 0 . 822 LEVEL OF SERVICE LN GR V/C GREEN CYC 1st LN GR 2nd LN GR LN GR APP APP APP MVM RATIO RATIO LEN DELAY CAP DELAY PF DELAY LOS DELAY LOS EB L 0 .844 0 . 300 100 24 ..9 508 8. 6 1 . 00 33 . 5 D TR 0 . 635 0. 350 100 20 . 6 1223 0 .8 0 .85 18 . 2 C 23 . 6 C WB L 0 . 209 0 . 150 100 28 . 3 254 0 . 1 1 . 00 28 . 4 D TR 0 . 348 0 . 300 100 20 .8 1048 0 . 1 0 .85 17 .8 C 19 . 1 C NB L 0 . 327 0 .150 100 28 .9 254 0 . 3 1 . 00 29 . 2 D 1 TR 0 . 560 0 . 200 100 27 . 4 691 0 .8 0 .85 24. 0 C 124. 9 C SB L 0 . 139 0 . 150 100 28. 0 259 0 . 0 1 . 00 28. 0 D j TR 0 .970 0 . 250 100 28. 2 845 17 . 7 0 . 85 39 . 0 D 37 . 9 D 1 INTERSECTION DELAY : 27 . 5 secs/veh LEVEL OF SERVICE : D ' CHRISTOPHER BROWN 3/29/1990 CHRIS LEADY COMMERCIAL LEADY11 INTERSECTION : SUNSET BOULEVARD @ SUNSET BOULEVARD @ COMMERCIAL DRIVE AVERAGE P.M. 1990 CBD?N UNSIGNALIZED - MAJOR STREET RUNS EAST / WEST TRAFFIC & ROADWAY CONDITIONS GRADE HV ADJ. PKG LN. BUSES CONF. PEDS PED BUTTON ARR APP (%) (%) Y/N Nm (Nb) PHF (peds/hr) Y/N SEC TYPE EB 0 2 N 0 0 0 .95 0 N 0 . 0 3 WB 0 2 N 0 0 0 . 85 0 N 0 . 0 3 SB 0 0 N 0 0 0 . 80 0 N 0 . 0 3 GEOMETRICS / VOLUMES LANE GROUPS VOLUME 1 2 3 APP LT TH RT MVM LNS WD MVM LNS WD MVM LNS WD EB 82 0 0 L 1 12 . 0 T 2 24. 0 WB 0 521 13 TR 2 24 . 0 SB 52 0 46 L 1 10 . 0 R 1 10 . 0 I I . CHRISTOPHER BROWN 3)29/1990 CHRIS LEADY COMMERCIAL LEADY11 INTERSECTION : SUNSET BOULEVARD @ SUNSET BOULEVARD @ COMMERCIAL DRIVE AVERAGE P.M. 1990 CBD?N UNSIGNALIZED - MAJOR STREET RUNS EAST / WEST UNSIGNALIZED CRITICAL GAPS CRITICAL GAPS (SEC) APP LEFT TURN THROUGH RIGHT TURN EB 5 . 50 ---- --- WB --- --- --- SB 7 . 00 --- 5 . 50 VOLUME ALLOCATION TO LANES LANE 1 LANE 2 LANE 3 APP L T R L T R L T R EB 82 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WB 0 267 0 0 254 13 0 0 0 SB 52 0 0 0 0 46 0 0 0 UNSIGNALIZED APP LANE 1 LANE 2 LANE 3 EB RESERVE CAPACITY 512 --- --- LEVEL OF SERVICE A WB RESERVE CAPACITY --- --4 --- LEVEL OF SERVICE SB RESERVE CAPACITY 278 776 --- LEVEL OF SERVICE C A . MAJOR STREET - EB/WB CHRISTOPHER BROWN 3/29/1990 CHRIS LEADY COMMERCIAL LEADY22 INTERSECTION : SUNSET BOULEVARD @ SUNSET BOULEVARD @ MINISTORAGE DRIVE AVERAGE P.M. 1990 CBD?N UNSIGNALIZED - MAJOR STREET RUNS EAST / WEST TRAFFIC & ROADWAY CONDITIONS GRADE HV ADJ. PKG LN. BUSES CONF. PEDS PED BUTTON ARR APP (%) (%) Y/N Nm (Nb) PHF (peds/hr) Y/N SEC TYPE EB 0 2 N 0 0 0 . 95 0 N 0 . 0 3 WB 0 2 N 0 0 0 . 85 0 N 0 . 0 , 3 SB 0 0 N 0 0 0 . 80 0 N 0 . 0 3 GEOMETRICS / VOLUMES LANE GROUPS VOLUME 1 2 3 APP LT TH RT MVM LNS WD MVM LNS WD MVM LEIS WD EB 4 0 0 L 1 12 . 0 T 2 24. 0 I WB 0 531 4 TR 2 24. 0 SB 4 0 3 L 1 10 . 0 R 1 10 . 0 ( r n . , CHRISTOPHER BROWN 3/j29/1990 _ CHRIS LEADY COMMERCIAL LEADY22 INTERSECTION : SUNSET BOULEVARD @ SUNSET BOULEVARD @ MINISTORAGE DRIVE AVERAGE P .M. 1990 CBD?N UNSIGNALIZED — MAJOR STREET RUNS EAST / WEST UNSIGNALIZED CRITICAL GAPS CRITICAL GAPS (SEC) APP LEFT TURN THROUGH RIGHT TURN EB 5 . 50 --- --- WB --- --- --- SB 7 . 00 --- 5 . 50 VOLUME ALLOCATION TO LANES LANE 1 LANE 2 LANE 3 APP L T R L T R L T R EB 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WB 0 267 0 0 264 4 0 0 0 SB 4 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 UNSIGNALIZED APP LANE 1 LANE 2 LANE 3 EB RESERVE CAPACITY 591 --- --- LEVEL OF SERVICE A WB RESERVE CAPACITY --- --- --- LEVEL OF SERVICE SB RESERVE CAPACITY 403 813 --- LEVEL OF SERVICE A A MAJOR STREET — EB/WB • CITY OF RENTON . :;: ; . • ,:. : DEPARTMENT.•:O .COMMUNI`I'Y:DEVELOPMENT ' CERTIFICA'T'ION:OF NOTIFICATION OF ADJACENT,:PROPERTY:OWNERS%SITE . PLAN :• : : : : • *** FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY *** • . •. . PROJECT TITLE: I c • . . , . . . APPLICANT: arlkig �.�.y • APPLICATION•NUMBER: SI�1 a49"/) • • . . IL • The following is a list of adjacent property owners and their addresses. A notification of the pending site plan application shall be sent to these individuals as prescribed by Renton City Code, Chapter 7 Section 38 of Title IV (Building Regulations).of Ordinance No. 1628 relating to site plan approval. NAME . : ADDRESS • ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER (see attached) • • • • • PLANNING® C BVISION am.OF FIE' N APR 191990 P- • • E. • li NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER • • Sandra Carter 13603 SE 107th Pl . 770310?0652 Q2 " Renton, WA 98055 Floyd F. Figgins '4225 NE 19th St . 032305-9060-03 Renton, WA 98656 • Sunset Highway Self 2000 - 124th Ave NET 0110-08 ' Storage Associates 'Suite B-100 • . Bellevue, WA 98005• • • • • • • • • • • • • • 1 • I ,, CERTIFICATION I, £vzS !/-� hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property owners and thei addresses were taken from the records of the King County • Assessor as prescribed by law. • • ATTEST: '&&scribed and sworn to before me, a Notary:public, in a for fthAe State f • Washingto. " resi:ling at � o - on tie1 6 • clay of , • Signed: • I CERTIFICATION FOR MAILING • I, rwAve,- IC• , hereby certify that notices of the public meeting on • the subject site plan approv 1 were mailed on ritilo ( to each listed adjacent property owner as prescribed by law," p. DJ.Pei#• , ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to befo:'.r.rst • me, a Notary Public, in d for the State gf NOTARY. w Washington siding at �w%yYvy�iej d PUBLIC S on the day of Ig , —*— inj►% a1 O 4 • • • Rev /8 CER T.doc • • • PLANNING &ZONING FEES NAME: •MCA A3S0 c-r PROJECT: I-,�c-d-(i1J . 22��,�C :19-G(-4>' Annexation Fees 000/000/345.81.00.02 Appeals &Waivers 000/000/345.81.00.03 Binding Site Plan/Short Plat 000/000/345.81.00.04 Comprehensive Plan Amendment 000/000/345.81,00.05 Conditional Use Fees 000/000/345.81.00.06 • Environmental Review Fees 000/000/345.81.00.07 Preliminary Plat 000/000/345.81.00.08 50% Final Plat (General Fund) 000/000/345.81.00.09 50% Final Plat (Park Fund) 101/00.0/345.81..00.00 Final/Preliminary PUD 000/000/345.81.00.10 Grading & Filling Fees 000/000/345.81.00.11 Lot Line'Adjustment 000/000/345.81.00.12 Mobile Home Parks 000/000/345.81.00.13 Rezone 000/000/345.81.00.14 Routine Vegetation Mgmt Fees 000/000/345.81.00.15 Shoreline Substantial Dev Fees 000/000/345.81.00.16 Site Plan Approval . 000/000/345.81.00.17 ��O.60 Special/Temporary Review Fees 000/000/345.81.00.18 Variance Fees 000/000/345.81.00.19 Other Misc.Planning/Zoning Fees 000/000/345.81.00.20 • Maps • 000/000/341.50.00.00 7041 Photo Copies 000/000/341.60.00.24 Publications 000/000/341.60.00,24 Postage 000/000/369.90.00.18 7055 Sales Tax 000/000/231:70.00.00 9998 MiniMMOrAREMONSOiln BY: cam/v DATE: 5 - 1 • W" '9O ,1,,.....„.„,14 ,1; . . ...; , ,. y,..„:„,,, • . ,,. . :: --- ,.,.,.1.11..;,,,,:s. :,...„. ,!.i.!, ...4?'., ,,,,,,*,...,,f....,,, ,,,, ,.!•,•,,••,..,•:!,,,, -,.• ,g.,4;4•:.,,,;.,:- .,•,r,';,...,:.i...1•\, A•4:..,. ,ti,i.}21,1.5.;,,...:3..,.,,,'i .......ty,i ,,4',.4.31,..:..,0;..t...,%..tiT. ;,,,..,.‘,...,.. ..'.'''''''!...'''..... ."ili'::,16''''''''.. • ; :;:''''. .., .1' '.' ...'.....: t 1: ''.i' : ',....7.1)t.',7(4T/1...':;`;:.7,•;„.:;::Z;i'',4.1":`,:iijkl,I.:tj,;1.,,.. t.q11".;:‘..2'?..f.'..;1•••••:!.; 1 ...'''''!•'.‘'',. ,,:$./1);'?;.1•'''''''F:7'!•4:::7714.• ti''';',1:6'(!..5i''i,.'•••!:';'!'''''''.7‘.:ir...;;:ilVi i'''''"'''.;!•;:.'''''''''';';:;''' e '.'''''' '' '7 :.''.3.''':';'''''''..".'. .: "'.::'.' '• ..:.'..... ! - :. ': •7 It .'.'.'‘j..:17. " ...I,i .:7),k.L..''''i-T..S.'''.l.'1.1•!../..{.4'i'1,.:It.,1(:"./;1ti.•°'.ii''P',f'7.1\v‘i'.%"...1:..V;:% ;..7',......1..1'::.IN.::t151;k:177,1;;i'',,.'7 3;;'',f7',...:r.e,`".•';','.;,;74.';';,:.; s''..‘,.:•;:',.',...';'..••,',.S.,7'.';'...t. . : C. 4%';..,,,=e$,-,.. ...t...,., . ,.:i,v.,, ..., .?', :•,.. '.. •.1.; t ...;,..z.;,.:-.:•c.,,,4,4,;l'Ot.,..1.,.(11ii,'. ;;,.);0,f...t,.4.!.:Y..0 i•• ',,t.;'.. ',!'i,,.'•,.?,p'•,:i.‘4•,....i.,9,A..,k1,;,;:s:.'.vx.::.,14,.':i•f-'•).1'..i.1.,,,.'•,%•:.';',:•4101-2,, '1,'t'",,,•;•`....'..' ....4•',,,..,... '•1'.'. '. i-•, ,i'i;',1„:, :::.i. : • • '..' r•, . :'':',,Y: ''•.-.', ,.• . i':•..."..',''`.!... ;..‘• ,'..,...‘','../'.:iNi.),A;;;i:'r;.11•;'•.:;f/i'•••••,•Y1.44....'';P:;..:'••f•NV •811...1..'1'.•''!:.'4.1V.f,.11rj:1.11‘.1‘ci•';';',t i''•'?.-•S'.41.1i.,4Yi'..s&f-1,';;S:17c';.''V••,•%.' ': ...,1,:•?,'(:';,',.....i,:,:;•:'i,1 ) ... , , .:si.4.....,,,p:,:,.., ..• ',...,.„•j,.,...,..:,-.:".1.1.:, ,,..:,.........:,....,.•,,,... f. ,.'...:0If.,.,'-,•:,,,,',1: ','.'..qt,'...i:it,,C:1,',.`.•,!,.;Y•I'.,f,';'.....:!':',i;i1;ei".;;.•-•'i,IJi.:',4.,i1.1 ..r,i'.•,•.'..:•,"''....,,''.,?,;,1';'.:•.:.?';';:,,..:'.%`:1;1'14::. :';'::.:?:;•riie.i.';':',?•si$,•,..3.1)...;',i,i',.,.?i,:,.,,'":_'' ,'/'::').,,"'";,i''''•;:1•''''.......;;'•;,;;:•?•,.., . ..,'•',., : :'...1','1.=:.',', ';,.1: •.:!i'..;:••.:',•• ... ;:'.....•'...', '.;:,•'•: :..i.•',Ii1):11,-.'''..% ,..;';'',..1,?•:., •:''r•':;qi',:i •i',•;41,''',(;;.-;.;',...:i,T,P"'jt,..‘"'4,•...'1,;,'J; i,:.:-',=i'•':',..li`.';'1.:,'P.1;,,'..i'•;1:';',41.),,;.?il:..,t;=;•14.i.';;;',',.1'.,%-i.,1'.i:.';'';,•-"''..7..itel . ..',.':.''.. :..;...''.1•..;•'•••: :•'.1,''',• • •.• :, : 41:,,1-).7.; ' ;:..:..: ',..•'. . .,. •• .: ...•; . .,.1t4,,,t I, ,41;„.•:,.14,e.t„,:i,41..,j..,••.•••,.Ak...'',,, .,q,••,,:•f,t,.1,..:••;-:,,' ':'•''‘rr'''i. .F•A!'1,....,:••••••;;'*:P:',4,1y/:.',74".'''::',',:'.4,',",'•:'',:,'•,;:d':‘•' ‘' f'''',c•.'tj!.;':''''.''',4.';...,. ,' ,ft ' • •qt ', •• 1•:.•:•••,',,,!',',•',.•. c't ' - .,,'.t•' • I "• ' . *,•••'•: ' ''''t-if&e•'•' 1•,,,:"'',•1!,,,t''•',''I.''.,./.'i.).::.'51,1.Y,Ii•I'.-,,.. :: ' '''.''.'0 '•'i;-...4.',...;:r'•..•Th•.,:f?,s;;;,4•,)...:b•;',,,•r,;I... ;.,,!..:.',..'••;...J,i*pt, ..,;:;.• ; ..•• ,„;,•, V:::'" '• • :' . .. : ;' . ''••. '. • ''• ..' •••.,' ....''':11i,, •7- '•‘'' il.::'°.r • r•-. . C,.r.'••i';'' •'tt••••,''' ... ,t•:..... •t- .1',.. ,:t• !ci••::,!•,••.: :'•:,•,:::',,,/,•:''•••), ,•-• t.••,,•• ,',..•,.' .& ... .4".', . '• , •'.'• ••', ' ''•!'t,',1;:"'...'• :''.•1 IN!V.,i,c;'i:I''.1‘...,'1!,.41..',..!•,•J; ..-:.-;;;•'.„5.i j ye.j.......,,'t.,tc,,..:-.;;;.,,., 4 ;.....„):;...„.,...,i,....,,.." •;,...,z..t..,...,.:,,,....fpr 4':i,: ",.•'' -',:.'. • 1'!A.:1;4,•• , .;;. • , :i 1''...... -*. • • ,• ..•/•••••:;.tV5i,*.:--/..' `').s.!':ii %!•41.,..; /. r.'...?.1k,' :..,;.:*.*;••••i':''1 ';''Y I .(.1..;;*•••••:-..*--l',,.,.':,1*.',..•; :..**...,;,,*!:;•;:::1,/ '...:,-,7..,....,•11•.•1,•••i,:,;;;...,A.11)?t.t, ; ..., '...•,,f, . ) ';.' '''. •t,•ii.P'-'01,'.•'..., . •,..,.,.•:...-•.c.',',..s..-. . •,•,:',••••,: •:•.''',, .••• t 4, c; '1. s/P1;'.', ,.i%I T•'..`1'1,-,`1.:.i'''..;.:..:'' '..•4:It,,4''•,'11:•i''1'''t'?...4f1••••'.::,,./.1'••••i•1':','.4: V „z;g1:.:•.,...:• :.•ir.'' .':;.1::•••4•'Vg-sf..r• •.:.....-.'.2.•'::.'• ••,:::• ' ••••,:14jq't.4''.'•. •`' ':'•••." i',.%!:•.1! •2I..! • ...:••• •.' ' .•".t',P!,.:.•. •', C.t':LtYLI.12.1'1‘"-''...i.t.._i_t.!.*:•,...1•A..,_71....,.1.,s, • --;.‘,....',•,;.•),...,?,',..;•,f.',.d.;),.,.:.!...j1..1J.,.;',',.. y,...,,....,..,..,...t.,',..,,,,,.....0....4q!,i,L,AT..,-ci:;,.,.,.,•.. ,,,,,,.;'..,.. ' r :}F:•1:',.‘,:" , ;,7, .'. 'i 9. •7•-"`'.4 ' , 4' ''' "71.1',:tP 14 j:;',7141,.,,$,;'!:',-ii',1;'1';‘,::',*ler'-'1::if:1111',-4-1.4.::•;':•-• ' :'4i"- ,,•I•::..•,•••• ' ; .. ..'!: • •••,.... - !.Y.:14''`.• -:.".:1' *'*'be:.;-r?-1';0.'," '';:?',',..**';'-'•'....;*.'1V,*'3/44;4•'",'.,.';.'•• • :••.' " ' ;,' •••.:i.. • • ), :•:.• •.- „: ,. .••,'' ..,..•;••;,.,', ".• • .' '1-,,is„.•".4t1.-:..r' -..4: ';. ,,••' .?:•:.',,,4, q:.',•;•-..i.i../....;;,,,..:5•••••:.;:.,:,'..01',.,'k,$.,''.;:.'•j..',•• -..• •••:, '. ;,,•'..•• ..•::.0";;;;•;.... .'•": •.• • -, •j•.: ,: ...,I.', = ,t:':•,,,,,•"i.':::,.-,••:.14"..1.',ifii',:.:.•ri.',.•:,',..,';,,;,'v,.1!•,',,:::::,...i'j•::;',,,t,:•:;,,. ,,,,••••"..'..••r."":••••••. .' CITY•OF RENTON4..;14,,'•.•',: •. ' •>. * i•', .. *..' itt'tfy."• .., '• • •..;-.. . -.:t., CITY TREASURER -v'e•- • .t.:,...s..„.s•..,(i..",:•!.:2..,•,..!.;:•:t•,/...,,,,;J ;..-/.... .,..',...1........ s'?A.!:',...% •..•.'.....,:• ::1.,... ,..... .;r, •. .....• .. ..,f.,.,..1. -../.?..,.).., ill r ,•,,•1;.1'....:...s''...'..:•:.,S;.":•;:1);':'1,tr,••••••••:"...,••J',.,..•.:,...•:::• .1.....:4;;`.,:..1:1.••••,.. ....... . :,•' ..''',,:s..:f.•.'i,....,,,, .. ..... ,• '...1.,,•-•' •'•.' '. REG/RCPT : 02-069 12 04-20-1990 .., 1 ..., . k..‘i....1.;,....,,,.?.....;,.r...,,,,:,.........'..r...,‘: :!','.2'•'!.••'J.',":-..•,c•':'.•)''-" •:.,.'•,.'."•• ."1.'. r i')',3•••• -1'4•l•••-11::. ,.•,,.,,rr•'...,,.;,.,,,t...-1.;..<•.,•..,..,•••:4t,r,it,•••.." . ;'•.• : . *.. ', f;'....I''.1:.-r 411 45 am ;'''''-.;;'*,'' • ***.-::°;.;.' ••,'‘ ;'".• CASHIER ID : H1..,!...:1.,:.•:......,:..i.,...41.„4. 1.,,:,.',....,s;?),,••••';;;••,,-;,•:,;•.'.,,,,;••.',•,,,,....'•!•. "--,:,;.:. • •:,•,.- .. •.'. • ..' •?4,*;,,,i,.'...• '.. ..'.• :, 'c, :••. ...' •':.:',1 --.--- = 1,;,....,47,7./..,,,::‘.:7*.;P:....,:1.4i.q`c%;!:...!;'1.17::2,'''.:,77'..1.,:ifill''..,':. : .: . 7 ' L::..' ''.%. ' '".!i.7 •: 1 i..4;::"; .:. 7'.....;• ' 8000 MISCELLANEOUS RE $92.50 •ti,..'•?..v,s.,z..,;;;,... . ''.•':.i .ii..i:•.1„.:t'v•••-i'''.1';:-.::.:.••',...11;:•••',.41.1, '''.••••' •.: ."• ''..' .•31;'•••••$'.4 •':?`.."' e%;J:4'4,•••••tr,•'•::::',,..''2..",''.'.•;•1'.11,:11CP-'.'',•,''..,:'•• .•'',:l""; ''';''''''' •.''.-.1..'ir'''''''';'''''"'''''''''''' :'''''r..'•'•••..:..*''''''''.''isti.'."•::; ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FEES /,:.1,,...,:•,.;',.:•.;.,.,•!.,ki',U;.1(iti: t.74:'•,'‘:.:-1:',,.*'•'1.:-:'1,•:••••••.',••;.. .i .,,,,,I(. .'....';:..-.•;::,q:„!.:`:.:','.';;.';::::.:".;.,:,....'..::'••..''..:'. : •''.;',.....",......".. 000.1300.00.345.81.00.000007 1,s(i.i.,..;,...:.,;•1.•:iy.V;•i'.,c.,;;;V..,:• .i...•:,-"....;;:',i,.:'•, ••.,•/,.'',.,.-',,,,,t;'4,..k,it.•••••':•,!: '''''':':;'''''•.::. ....1.4"'C''''''f';`‘...'"' '.....•••,••••••';'i 7:'•••.;''''••••••••.gs.,;'s;'s';.;• 8000 MISCELLN1EOUS RE $800.00 !,c---•i':::p.,,,....s•-..f,':,...-;•,.-..,,,,..,,.....••.... ..,..1)e,h.v,.........:f, •,-.'7.1. 7: r5,'••':.2.i!'•r•;1•;;'f:Vi'''''',....,r,'.?:..;:ti'.;i•.•'•ti.;,-,..:• 'i'..';•'...;;;•,..rmfv,:,..:?:... ...,,,,,...i• .•;i1.';''....'.' ...• :••••.1f.-Y1,-.':;:...: • .......•-" • •'',a..;',.• '•::.•••:: -:' SITE FLAN APPROVAL (..c.:••-•....,:','-.1..:i:'....i....,A.,;•:••,,,,..s.:•',':,.....,..:•,.,..:.. ...4..0 ,..:••,... •. ,.. ,. ,. ...,...f..5 ..., :,,...s.,,....:ti.,••Ot,-,•,•"..•.'; -'.:••.• :•.• ,...,•";. te.?!.. ....0'". * . '.'''''' ''''''''." ..• '''.. .. ' '''''''.. ';..:' . 1-11111 000 00 345.81.00.0001317 i:T..'..,/..:•••;2'..1,,1.:1.:."',i' .(:',i;3'..if•••••;•;•.,..•:•:::`.•:•1..•.2'.';:-..•:...:3':•1,1•1•:;•:•.•,•,-:;5•-:....••••'...• ..-"... .:' :: .:!•§1c..??).•!•': •..'';'''.• -• ,'---......•• - .'-'•i' .'. h..,......,-,;:...•••:...5....1...:.:;F.:,..1..f..f,,..4', -..,,z!,:,.,1,-....,. . •....- TOTAL DUE $892.50 .....„.,..‘,...;::".••4;.•)-;::•:i':'..i.,.'.:;P,.4.4,''-...,..i..:::`•.;.,..',...,': ,..',.'.1.•,•.,'.1'.1i•-,-,•,,,',:•.'"... '.' : .,' • ., ' - •:....#0.Ao's.r...s;'.. ..27•''.•.l.': ..!''.'' ',.'''..i '..: '''•.. ''''. ..I'lq:''. .'.1 ''.. 'e,t-i'ii::: : •:'.';'. ''''• RECEIVED FROM ii.,1,•i,i';';'...•:.•,,..•.:',..;;''..s if•i•!,:,•,:'",.';',Y,`"E,.:,.1..j.i-.'"'1.;''...1.,-1':1 iiqPi.11,..!';'7,:'•:,:',.:-•. ......'• ' :5.;;.'4..1:.•'`...".A'..•/:‘.1"''';,44,..q'Ast,...,'1•,..1.'",;',.!''.:%,,`,!."'-:!.1''..'..;,f rt•.'ile,';•',.i:• .••••;;•,... . '.,.•:;•:1:';,,,, ..n....',...'!...1.,.11•;;,:146'-:.,-.1..1',..'•'•;.' ..''.''::•..'.' '. •••:.''......;.'f..,''' .* .;),,,: •, MCA ASSOCIATES • ,,••••:..... ...•,1..?:3.,.....:,..••••,:i•; ..., „,, :"......?..'.'•••.,4•,•!-- %:-.' ...'; •• t'.. ;',-•,••'!...'.-,'•;-'),:k••'',"5..." 1-;•,-"••.•'q..;.r..,:,....,4,0,,,;•4174. 4.,:•., .: '..-,";• •''...• •'.,; -. i•liii,.....),•„;!: .f • ;. i:: '•• .1..,'.-,•. . .j.,,7:• $892.50 ,(',1,4?••,;c...1'...-!•iiii ',.;./. .I.'./:-..:. ..•:.,II. `..•;.;'•;.:'''A'14P'''''.1';': . '..•.:; '. - .. •. : :.'it,',;:v.,••:....•... ,7 ..'' •....i..', ••' .' .'•':'..- (11ECY, ,.: i., '•.....i.g.',,W .'.. 1...' ".. ...• .' :7.1• ' It,''''.,V1.• '•I l'," ‘','•`'.'•'':•':.•" •':••.,•,%.• ,...2 A,,,-..•.,••- • •:• • TOTAL TENDERED $892.50 it,ity.i; ,......?..r,;••,•:4..,; ; ;- - •.,...;"fs.......;-.,.'..i.:1_,?),-•!.:!•:. •... .:-g• . ..:....,•:•;':,..:••:•.'slYi'.:••.'11-ji...:',. •;,.:•'• ...;..!.; .' ,. . . : ni i.,.:•..i;',"..;°i•i k.q..•. ..,....,J•••,c•; •••:'.•,:.•-.17,:-,R,,..,.. : • 4 . IK•e;3 's4•.5.,,T.'.': !. ;•ii:: ':••••.., ..• .•• fl".'•11;1'•i:"•-• • •:,•:, ...,'. *•:.:•'.b,..:.;i:v......:. .;: .',;'• ': •i'... .; .2„.-;•••••:.! .CHANGE DUE • $0.00 1, :'....'•.",'......,..,.1.e....;..,•,,•?•,..,,,,••••,.. ,,,,:.-.•,. ..1:-.o... •.' •••-• .,„... „,;...,,,..,...7,-.......,qs,...„.;...„:,......,....:=:. ..:.:',.•1.•;.•4:'. 1....:-..,,,,•,.r:•• •i v. ,,-.-: , ,',,,"41,•Ts.,•,..;,,.'.;.•..• . •;: • '..•....',?...,.....:• :'....,*,:t,.t..i'..f,••-•... ,'•,',:.•:,, • '.,.,1i,....i,.: :.:.:'.•" - • = );i,.'.;...:,i'.....11i,,.L),,....Y.(,...,:,_:..,,.:•...;i.%,,.•,:i:‘;;?,,,,•,,l,1iid..-'••'•..,.,:.,;:.;.;..,.y,.'.,,•*,':'..•..•,.:,!.‘.:..1.',:i:17.(,i.•;.t..,'b.;r-c1'::..i''i‘ts.1,':•:,.':':.::.';.....:•.•...•,`...•,''i',,......;•'1•-,:•...,.*.:,,•.:,,;..r i!..k.-..t,.1°.,:41,.!;;..•..!,(...,,?" ; ,, • - , I ; ° 1 ,,',;•',;.,,.•r,:.....,,,'.•..•••',•••..'•'.1'..•f;'•.'':,. .•.':•.,-".i:".,/,•;;1.;•., • •.•.- • ••,.., , . - • . 4".-1'r' •- ; t . .,.... ,.•;••.k' • ''L'''j....':...'.A..:•.,•r;:;''', . .4'•::..:.;'...• •-•'':'•• • • ,:',...:';'•,',...',:•5'.•-•1'.1 P••••=i':•'•';f'•:.,'.•.'• '; '''''.'''.4.'• -• • •• ,•,,,.......4 '•-,.•';• .:-...••:••.•I • .,'..: ••,,i,:i'lq•-,:'", . .. ,• •. , ,,‘;,,i"::,.• . . . • :,.:.•., ;. ,..,e. • • • . i .t.i...,...,•ii•2,:i',...' .. ...* ...•,:!.i.,',7, 7.1::.;:••. V........7.• .;',;•.$';‘..:•.:,,,,:2'..!:,..',..:',..J.,.r.„.•,.:.,;i....:•;.'1,,,..i,?.0:,!!.,,....... . •• ; •/• ' ' :'-4-'''•.'.'4••1''•' ,..•'1.:'r." 'i:•:.".•• •'••::';''''.... ':...',4'?::.,-,' '•',.i.:.'•;:•-::'i.•'f':..;..fl ....' ..;.'•....`:••'.'•'';',,,••1r•Atk'''::'.'... • . ': ... ;-1-,17.4,4,..,7,,,..,P:;.,••••:••:,:i...1,i''''';'.•'...1,:•:.,..',1.,:!,:.;','•,1, ,;'....•-•."';',...',..:,..!.',1.: •,'•••••.'.......',....''''01,113."'"....;••:. .•, ..,....•,,•„.. ,.: ,11,4• •••,,,;',,..• - ',.*:_;•••. .• .•.').,.i..,',.•.: : .,...;.':• ' .:,,',..,:.•-. .; 1,1•11 ;•,1 ik-y,...3rjr),;;;..,:•:.•,;.•:1,';....31',';''';';',-4.1;'•e.':•;/-...',. ..1',.•,..•„4 r,,,,.„ ,.d ‘4..,:::,-,..t...,... • ...•T.',•••••••,.,.;:.',' .1,‘-.ii'.j.•• '.- '••'.'.'• .•''•••• 1;•:;:i';''.1*•*';i';•.''.1.-*,;- '*4'::•.... .'• ;:;•;'*;'•:'••"'i'''*••••ii*. . ••1•:'*'••'' ;` '•'*••••51'.••• :''21:tr.;r•-':•1' *'•-•'.;‘.'i*:::',•;*.•••' 1‘..:, .....'C..f.';•';4.4..I.'..,fAt,., ,;i•:.,,: vAq,..ir. .:,,,:i.,i...?f.';,..;4;':, •:•',./i ,';• ..”:::',..:44,ki0,..,.'.....,,-. ' • .;•;" '... •;:'.'....•ii;',4‘.`::.-: :•.:':;::::::..:,..ii,.'.;,';:,.. •,:, ,.'.-::•''..:•.•:.....„ .';:•:,.........'.'t...; ....'.tiP ':''..i'llti'..:`'ii:z!..`....!:'.:P'i; i.',.:•:',:q •:;',..,,,.z.:'•.;i!:i';;.?:',2,.......?‘...;i:`,:;U:',.. ...'::.iii:''....::;••:;;:!‘'4)';.1:;.'st,21::::::....• , ....•' .. Th.... • ....,.,...,,, --. .•• ........,.... ,:..,.•:, • .... .'or ••-•;:.: 1...• •• •••f.• !,..•-•••:.'‘:F. '1,••.:-4.' ',••"1-1•A'A'-''-'-'%••••••"'-'‘..': •'tt."4,•;''''.c•*•7--',1-A'•••'.1:d• '!,-"""::''*-'';'',4'''' '7.:',•'.^::'.:77•k A St'''''.i:"'':- • .• • * • • : . • • •••:(..v;•,_. . •;-., • ., tv,,..„, . .,... • -,.... •••-..."•‘, •k.•,. :.'':••'(2..;ni'i';t:•.•.':- •.r.'..-0". .....-i',.,;.4-,..: :,.-,,''.1,;,';,f.ei 1'..,'• 7....?'tli..f7...7..'`...'..7....i.;:t.;,.. ::.i' '.7'...!•,;;:;:','''.1''21.';7'-...";',.'....?'•;•.:,•„,;•••,-•'• t •.€•..t • ..'.,,•:,,i,1"..04;‘:i'.,.:• '.,,.. . ,,,. . ;,;.,,, . i,, '...•••'• ::. :; . '.. ....,{,^41•II:,-'4•i:t. " .:'g''i ,1 .:,.;,.,':..'.,'.•',iti,'l',..•:..,‘..,,,,,..),'..- •:,;•.::.•.:;•••:,%:.•::.•• -,..-.• c.f••-.-:••• •::,..,;41 f,-• i...''..r. •••:.-"::'`'.':•1•4;1'P,::;':• '7 : ..'..,,• .: ..: :..,;.:,.1,',7.1.:?...'":7..1': ..'...:.'...... :1;'...:•;•... f*'...*.-.‘'...• •Sk.; •. . -, ,:*,W;' :,,,•:,..,,•...,••• ...,: ,.!,, .,•J.,•••••••;,•!.i.5.: ::,.•••,.,';:.•-•,:•',•:,••• ii,,.it:.!,!.,:•••••,,,.„..,:zt•-•,;.' . .,•,•;,•,',•••,,,•1••,.,......,,,' -,..••, ' :, i,;.-;•:-.1y,,,;14,,,,,..4'..:,-,.':•• •'.... • '''..- ::: . :.'..'•'•%.K'f:f..'"''.•••••.••'.!'•.' '.'....:'••':'•:''• ,•••••••••••••• .. '::•':','::••• s's.'41,11 i:'-•,V:' .:;,•ii'l$.•••••;',•''f,';',',•t;•'.,,1•14. ' •,,'„.'•- ',?•::!:::',..„.i.,...y.:•:;!,,,,,,,.. ,..Y.,:.i;.. .,•:.:t.,:',.:...•:,; ,.'iL:•.•,.:'.:,.,,,,:,'::•••••,:•,.:•;/.•••' it'i....it.:!•'?•.....•'; ..', , , k . ... . ..: ,,f,-.:,i,..,1:1-........E,:,......•.....,,, ,... .:-...,;„,- ,:,. : ;:,.....•.. ,... ,'.........::‘.1 : ,, . ,,.. ,„.......,,,,.,,q ,)1„.„,,,...i.:....; ,..0 .,..,,..••I''i;*• '''*."•••••-•-•• '•!•"•• .4.- . .-. . ..10.,-::,.:,,.:, .,... •• • ••:., ...' ..• •••:.,, ,; .. ..'.., •. .•....,,,,„„t. .,,...:,.::. : ,•...)y,;......;: ... ...,..:,.;!,:;..:.t,..,... .......1,itf,571,,-;'.1,,.;'•ii.l..;.;:.;').,:;•:1,.,...:•:;11,.'i ;;;',,f,,...",,‘•.A.;!'.%:„..';'...-.,..•1..:',:'.......;:.."..;•,.,:t.:1.-ki1';l';'..., :;'..: '.. :,; ::-. ,.. •,..,....•;?v.,,,,•;,.,,:.,:,•,. '.....::,.., ,..-:•-,..sy•-. , 1 ..;',....!,.. .,'•..........•; •!••..."I411,•. T:.•,,.; .1,...,,, .; ....:.. ,..•....,,..,,.:::,•••. ....,.,,...„1., .'. ,..:•,,,,i ':.•A; •;,•.'",. t',:•r•.k:',••••••••••'4'•::...1-r.•-'.•:•,:" •'•$••ti-t•'c;....-•'- ' •••- :•*,'''• .•1•••:'.1*C4i .•••• •,:*-;,'•., ':••••••.•••' • .•*'•:,i..•,"• :• •••. , • ''•Et.,.'fir.;•••*•••....if, ••••;., .,;'&*•:/:,•:!- ...; •.I. ..!..;• .-;:'.•‘'•;;;•':•.k• 1114:1.','."...4,;:14'•:• ., -••.'`;..;.'..:.;.....,1.1".!i,:',':c...'.....:)-'-',.',.;1....:••.•:1':.:...:•••:!.."-,qt1•:•,:.:'-,..•-.• •,.... ,. ,:::.,..... .,....q..,i,,,...,,,,.,.... .,...:r• ....;.!:. • •;•, • . ... ... ‘. ,.5 ; .•.'••;1..r..,) :',....:;•.:".:.••..,•.•'..i1.5',.-'•.• ''-,•,..':...-i...,:2'.'41'„4..f......:::-,.7.i.' ... ••••3!-...!,'•';:.''',ti::::',-::,:i.',:•:,':;:(•:7.1 .. ...."..,:.''':,•';'1,:21,1•-'i -,•''. . ...:.-...:. ''•::, ' .•'. k,•'' ''‘... : ,.. • .•'•., • • ''''. • .:.;.; '•;.:',;74'. i., •'',n,' •", ,..,...,:.!..,..;:.,' -. -;,.....t1....v.,f,'.1 ,.:,.'.." ;•.,..n-'4i.;••••. .:"[,.-:t..;,..,.....•',.:;;,`:,-.!.;!.A..•;':-...!;•.:•:.....-'•:.;,........-L04:-:''..',. .•".-: . • : .1,,,,,),...'-ii:.'...' • ••• • • -'•.: .• ". .., .... .• f,..-;•t(Ps.:..•:'. ' '..:-•::::,c,'::;',....: , '; .".' ..,....?'....' :';','-'/: :.,',.P‘IT''',...,•••,. :, ....., .'• : ,••••••, , ., ,.. i .•'•#:.::',1-illi,':'...' • • . ,,4,,!:, e,:•:,•••...• :.,::... : ‘:•:. • ..-••• . ..• ....),,,',,,A,:,,,i,. .... .,:L..•,.. •.:::-....,....,;,,..,, ....;.......vo ',.....• ..-i.,;•;.:P-.....•',,;;;;.,. '....,.,.•,•:c. '„'-1,..(fi. ; .. . , . • ..4,v...;„•.,... .,„;.,, . ,i,v,: .: .f'',..; :•. ...;,"',''...':''.,'t, ',..l'A',„••.i,...•',.,1' •1:::.',...,,',.:i i 7:: ;', ...,"'...:,? .......f",.:;;;..•,y;:i.'• i;'', •'17)4.;f• :'....7''. '''-'.4$:+1,`....;•';''`...•:'.7‘'......'-',1:r'''.74'' '' •':'''. • • I -; . ' ii'•'',,'"','''' • •'• . .•. ;•..' ';'''.,. .•. ' '• . i.1'1.'V l••'''';.•••'.• !''.;,•k. .' ••`....'.''.•' ,..i'. ', ‘..,1.'.. ...r I.!''.', • ':,`.....c:•?;.'''',. ...• `:!,...: !•::•, •,;:1, •••, ...., -•.•:;'Efr4',5• .'• . . ;,h,,j,•• .••„ . . . ).*I , r ). f , I. ,, . • . ,. • ti 'r, '•'''' :•:. ... •••••;':. : .:::f. . - • ' ,. ‘': : '-....4...'• .•.': . • ..,..i • .• ib ,, •'..•:.„' • 1)::,.. •,:..••.1,`,,••.;''.• '. •• • '.r','•••,,,i; •• '.••.'.. . . . 1,•'•;,.1.... . ..e, .•': ,. • .•• "• • ..'••'.: • 1 .4)) l''':' ; •.?;f....;: . i . ' 'C!,lil-; ..:'.:,''.•!•.';ti': i1.2!.,...c..'•:-..'.:!,:•:.-.:.' ,•?,'..-:•••J'....,..'.,.-• ••,-r.*:.••••,..:, ,•...:•;.: -,' ',i......,-,i1...,...;. .. :.. • - • • , ''..' • ••, . . •; ••. ,,.tY,,o, .,•. •••,.,,,,'''l r•',•. ••• .','",••..) •• '.,lir, V....:' '..;;: '.: : ••4;r:' '...-..k •-•:'.••.•••,-.':.•,..1,•,.,•,-.4','•••:;.`, • •. , .,2,‘,',..,,,::k •.;'. ;: -';•i••:;. •• . . , , • : :;ilt;', ,',-,•,.•'.!• ,-.:'vf, :••:' ,,•'•':•••"j4.':•:.- •i ..,,•,1).‘,. ;:.,.. ,••,.......• ..,.,.., .:..:675..,. ..'.•i.,•:cf,}j.......i',7.7::'.' 7. „.;;.1,..,...7...);:.: • . •. ;1...ii. , 1 ..' • .' ,. . .. ; ..!V. :•• . '1, .' . .• "i...i i "..7:i':: ..•.', .7':IL.° • 70 ':i'.i.'.; .,;}7 '''. '•:;s./;:"-;. ... ,.: ..:9'. :,'••., TiV:7-•6'.. •.. : 'it,,..:....,''':. :.' •. '' •.'.' '.: s' .. .7:.. •• ;;••••• !....:'7•.':i,.7. *• ''.'..;*':....,:* '....*•:-;‘,1 Cif, ."...::';.•'..:;;:"..* ',' • ;11;'. • •••:,...•'1:.••1:.••••'',•• t; *; .'.,•:1: 11",j;•••• •; • .. '' •' ..3.-'':.•A'-;l'': *.•1*- - .•'• • • '.• , ' • ..- . '• •• :..4:1;`,..T;•Iii•:•1 * ' •'..1'1,..! • *`--'.;, f.'': i-'. '.•'•''*1' ''' • ••; •'•';-. ' • ..."•,-*'•*'.1- '''-•:;:.-•-.-'•,' '' `. '.• i'',,,•*•";:li•.• .' . ' • ., . ;•f,.1'.;°.•••• . • , ' • ..X.1';'fA1:,••,'':'., .• ',;;'1'i :., •',;: :‘.,...•••• ,•,....-,•,, Ifr, •:.!. : •,...,...• • ...•::, ., .....,.•:,t•'•.. • -- . '•..: 4,11',' '••- . . , .•,•:,`-w•'24::,. . .:• • .' •'. • ;iyi,e'•,,rt' .,'1 '•'' ';1 .".'•.',. . '','1';,••.' 's".,.i.',.i.,,„f.; •:!:•.:: .;.,.. 1,;•: • ,:...,.•.. . ,.......•:.::.., ....'•,•:, •••..:: •,•••.4,11,..?,,,e,,...,•• •• •• . • I . • •• ;,.1.1i.P ;'• • . ,•• ...,.. .. l •••••• • ''''.!•-,.1',; ...,' . 1 ,..1!.',.: . '••-i 1''....:.,...,...:,..fs....". •,••... : - ,,,f,',...;:;f::•.. •;:q1.'',•%.• ••''' • .'•;:(;-': :: '", . .,.. •'•'... .'-• '11•-•••)•q;‘•`• :;.'•'••.:`•••••:'••'.•: 1':•••'..." '. •1.:.'•;,.',;• : •,,'. •.::• ..':§7', .i.!, • '' • • ' :.. . .. . '','.1•,.•..• ' - . .1,Iri,t.,. ' .'.:..-.: • I . :. v..; •;•....•,. . .- • .'",.. •. . •. • ., . ;0.J),y:•,;111.••••":,'•',.,•..,:,.i.... ;-: :. ,;..'7.1.•... ,.,• •,•, . ',:i1,,••••' •-••••'••,•'"-,:..•'. •'.•,•,•,:::.• •..--;:•'1.1 ! ' ; . if '•. •, '•., • •'•1'0:,...1'C'":?;',..: - • • •.:• •....••-..',,,-,.: . . .: ... ..:' -1,4';:4•,-' '.• . • ' 1.i'.',i' • : . . . .. . . .• ' •',i •.'. ''•••1'.; • •'I. . ,:•'‘ ..;'... .1 - •.,;••!:1,1 1. • • .- 7••! .•,..:;;Ir., ; • ..1.,f•.:" ..•'.,,.'., . 4-,,,,,::•: . .. • . • s ."'•' •.• ; , .•4..•;•• •., :!...,., . ..,, •.::.:. ,......,,•:..f.1:• „•1..,:.,,,..• .. ..„•••,;...?0,... ..1",.::,,,.,• , . .., ... ..•. . • ..,,,ii ,. . .' :,,'.J,i •.•••1;•,.. ....':•;',...::',1 ‘i:-i•:"::: •,/,'''',fs; :.....,;•'.•°."•••••:,....".1;.. •r.-........,•:,.••:.i,.!;:i'/'!,- :.••.•• .••,,":••..••'.'',•.•z;.,•',•!rf,.. , , - .•- ' :;'5'':';'.• • • ... . : . ; ' .:.;r4:1;::.' • ..'..'•.1.;;; ,•i;i .!: .,7,'i•-;•,;:: i.• T;ir '•,':: .... -.1..: ......"i,i...,%.....;',.-•:....,ki,•:',iii.:-.,: :,..'•••1:. ,: ::•.,....•;c4,,,,,:1,,,:.s.::.. • ...0.,/,. ; .. ,..,.....?l:- '•'' , ...,.,"...e.:.;' r:•„'.....:.,:,,,,, '-s:..-•.......(:'.., ,,.. : ;,•••.,:;.....:-..,.:•;' ,,.-:;;..;: :.,.. •.• ...,'.;.....,-.Y.7,,u:•• :. . . • . •'.,r.„...,...,"_.- . .. ... . •••• •,•,. ,.,. •••. ..- ,(..;,Av. • . ..2.-.:,••:, .-.... .... ';';;•:!,..;•: 1.....•'...-',.,••••,....;, ......:: .;,•-,::•,,..,.,',..,,,,................,.,,...„.•,,.., ..,-.,.• •,...., ••:.'i.li:,,,:4,,,, . • • •-. .:1.7;,"i,i,;,.•,'.. • ... - ,•....., ••.. , - :,.../..‘4,:, ,:. .,'. .•. ..-?,", .:::;.% . '...s.,): 1,,.:',..'..,/..i.o..,,, ":',.. ..:-,:..,;•::...... , .....;.. .. :;-..,....... . •,,,, ..., .....i.:47..,.... . '•. •..t.'• ...;" • d'• l',''-''' •."'•.'(''i ' I• t,•.,, .(,, •I.', :' ,.. .4 4 t ". ' • ' l";.`,:: • . .: * .. .: * *. • ...''. -• ../ii',4 .• . . .•'--•t 1• • -• .• 1,. • • A : . . . . ••.-•. '•-.,I: ..' -.,•-•,-•• . • . -.:‘. .:LAG . .. . ; •!?1:'*it;;• * 1.'1•,4.'..• *• '.': - " •• ' •*''''•' •' ' •1.1-:;',.••• t •.*t.'''* • *-••';.;',"•-•"".;:i.:1'::'.• . .. "..4',..!;.r• - ... :;•1"?1..V .'' ''•'•'"•!, • ",'. ' 1:.••'•••• ;: ' : 1,(':,11 ?' ' .,••'- so, :, • . .•': ;•"...,i...." ,",. ; . , .,'1.;,,,c7,•J,. ,:!' ',. . • • ' .• • • .•::. i.21:.106•:.. • ., • . . • ..., ... s.,4(.ii•- 1 REr'ON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT r\ ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWI-NG DEPARTMENT: DATE CIRCULATED: May 10, 1990 COMMENTS DUE:_May 24 , 1990 ECF 049-90 APPLICATION NO(S) : _SA 049-90 PROPONENT: Ned Nelson PROJECT TITLE: Leady Retail Bldg. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for 10,500 square foot retail center. The center will be subdivided to suit tenant requirements as space is leased. 1 LOCATION: 4546 Sunset Boulevard SITE AREA _37,500 sq. ft. BUILDING AREA (gross) : 10,500 sq ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY' 1. Earth 0 0 0 O 0 0 2 . Air 0 0 0 O 0 0 3 . Water 0 0 0 O 0 0 4. Plants 0 0 0 O 0 0 5. Animals 0 0 0 0 0 0 6. Energy & Natural Resources 0 0 0 O 0 0 7. Environmental Health 0 0 0 O 0 0 8. Land & Shoreline Use ° ° 0 O 0 0 9. Housing ° ° 0 0, 0 0 10. Aesthetics ° ° ° O 0 0 11. Light & Glare 0 0 0 O 0 0 12 . Recreation ° ° 0 O 0 0 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° ° 0 O 0 0 14. Transportation 0 0 0 O 0 0 . 15. Public Services 0 0 0 0- 0 0 16. Utilities o 0 0 1 COMMENTS: 1 We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact oi- areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Rev. 6/88 RENyoN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF- 049-90 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA 049-90 PROPONENT: Ned Nelson PROJECT TITLE: Leady Retail Building BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for . 10,500 square foot retail center. The center will be subdivided to suit tenant requirements as space is leased. LOCATION: 4546 Sunset Boulevard TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED1IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE CO I ITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON MAY 24, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED DATE SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 '