HomeMy WebLinkAboutWTR2700489 W-489 WEST HILL RESERVOIR -
#1 Gener-1 Correspondence
- -I m
M- 0 5}eRaGe Ficillfie3
BEGINNING
OF
a
F�ILE
FILE TITLE OI AP� U e
0��
WestM� l � IP�s�xue � R
# 1 gelveeaL
CokRe sPau6enice
w�
OF R'P
�.� PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
V
DESIGN/UTILITY ENC.INEERiNG 0 ?35-25JI
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH 98066
vtl
IEO SEPtE.0
BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH
MAYOR
April 9, 1982
Puget Sound Council of C wernments
216 - 1st Avenue South
Seattle. Washington 98104
Atten0 on: Ms Mary Olson
Gentlemen:
Please find enclosed two copies of the A-95 form for a water
system proposed project for the Renton West Hill/Skyway area.
This proier.t is an approximately 52,000,000 new reservoir, pump
station, piping systems and source improvements to service the
City cf Renton and Water District Nos. 14, 63, 69, 77 and 88.
If you have any Questions, pleas* contact our office.
Very truly y,urs,
Robert E. Bergstrom, P.E.
Engineering Supervisor
ItEbtjft
Enclosures
a.
i ; 1 Tj-
-
• .es o W.D, 1
o Renton
er 1 �A, T ission M in
WON °
o ter Statign
y IBM OM
it .,r.F- • ` - �: ,e e •S ' may!
„ . 495 i 5 4
Existing '
'ter t i
o r .
r
REGIONAL WA IE
•ti j ]
rt_
ar t
• • r V.
y OF RF1
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
R RICHARD C HOUGHTON • DIRECTOR
p_ PIC. MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE SO RENTON.WASH 98055
�aO,y. e
,�ee� 206 235 '2569
.Er• sev.t.
BAP.BARA Y. SHINPDXH
MAYOR
April 9, 1982 RECEIVE
APR 9 1"'
Honorable Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor CITY OF PCNTON
!htnicipal Building �MAYI)F•.'1: (1FF}f,E�
Renton, WA 98055
Subject: Vest will RIservoir
Dear Havoc lnpoch:
We request vour approval and signature to th, attached A-95 Review
form for d potential application for Referendum 38 Water System
Improvement Graota from the State Department of Social and Health
Services.
At this point, ve do not know exactly who will participate in this
Proposed projacl nor do we know if the Referendum 38 program will
receive additional funds In the current Legislative Session. out
this application to to keep our "hat in the rinR" and since we are
the Only Category "C" project that the DSHS 1148, we will he virtu-
ally assured of A grant If funds are uvailahie.
Vary truly yours,
x r
Richard C. Houghton ,
Public Works Director
REB:Jfr
Attachments
OF RE,
.q
,} z PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
DESIGN, OTILi Ty EN&NEERIN6 • 235 2631
✓R NUNICI►ALBVILDIND NOIALL AVE.5O. RENTON.WASH.98055
b
P
e'en met E` INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM
SARf3ARA Y. SHINPOCii
MAYOR
Date: April 15. 1982
TO: Dick HouSkton
From: Bob Bergstrom
Subject: 'west Hill Reservoir
Dick, as I showed you we had RH2 Engineers prepare a A-95 Review Form for
the West Hill joint use reservoir. With the passage in the State Legislature
of an additional S10 million for Referendum 38, the DSHS will be in a very
good Position to fund this project. We have included in this Project for
401! State funding
A. Well Na. 9
B. West Mill Reservoir
C. West Mill Pump Station
D. Pump Lines from Rainier Ave, to the Reservoir
E. A Major Transmission Main to tie to W.D. p63
F. A Large Booster Pump Station to Supply I.' 0. a 69, 77 f 88
The next item of work will be to check the tank site soil conditions, complete
our negotiations with Skyway Water Districts and decide who will go In with
us. Then we will need to complete the Final Referendum 38 Application, Up
to now, I ha • had RM2 comp`�te the minor paper work Referendum 38 grants and
billing his time to the Taltx,t Hill Transmission Main.
The next ems of work 1 would like to start are:
1. Do some .oil borings on the Olm ;tt Junior High School
r site to test soil bearing capacities on this site offered
VA us by the Renton School District,
ro�
f t�s 2. If the soil conditions are adequate. I would like ;o get
S • gsd AC an easement for the Tank Site from Bill Belmondo.
PV5j3L131, � 3. Prepere an agreement for the Skyway Water Districts
tie them to us.
4. Revise Engineering Study AH2 had prepared in 1981 so
that the major Reservoir and Pump elerients are sized
right.
5. Complete Final Referendum 38 Application for approximately
S.8 Million Dollars In State :ropey.
Please reviaw and your approval would be apPrec Lrted,
RE9:Jft
0
OF RFC
� � T
z PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
"M DESIGN/UTI'.ITY ENGINEERING 0 235-2631
g MUNICI►AI RUILWNG 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON.WASH.980a6
0
P
ED st'l
BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH
MAYOR
April 28, 1982
Renton School District
435 Main Avenue South
Renton, WA 98055
Attention: Mr. William Belmondo, Property Manager
Subject: Proposed Water Reservoir on Dimmitt
Junior High School Site
Dear Bill:
As we discussed by phone and in person, thr- City of Renton Water
Department is considering construction of a 1.5 Million gallon
reservoir on the Dimmitt Junior High School site in Skyway. We
would like to test the soil conditions on the southerly end of
the site whey, you have indicated the District could accommodate
a reservoir.
We would like to get a soils testing firm on site and drill into
the fill to determine the suitability of the existing soils after
school is Out.
Could we obtain permission to perform soils Lasts during the
summer on the Dimmitt Junior High School stet
Please feel free to contact Ron Olsen or myself if you have any
questions.
Very truly yours,
Robert E. Bergstrom, P. .
Engineering Supervisor
Jft
cc: Richard Houghton
020-i •
Renton School District 403
u75 Main Avenue South, Renton, Washington 98055
May 5, 1982
Mr. Robert E. Bergstrom
Enoineering Supervisor
Public Works Department i
City of Renton
200 Mill Ave. S.
Renton WA 98055
near Bob:
Some time ago I indicated to Ron Olson that the District had approved
the request from the City to conduct soil to-•s on the south end of
the Di mitt Middle School site.
We are happy tc cooperate with the City in their search to find a
location for a 1.5 million gallon reservoir.
If I can be of further help, please feel free to give me a call.
Sincerely,
.� .
Belmondr
Director of Plant Operations
cs
cc: Dick Houghton
Gorden Thompson
Ralph Hite
Cis C'f!t�,1 ��
ov
� T
„} z THE CITY OF RENTON
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE SQ RUITON.WASH 911065
BA14BARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • FINANCE DIRECTOR
e MICHAEL J MLILCAHY
v 235 2556
rE0 SEPtE�.
August 19, 1982
Mr. Lin Gay
Roberts 5 Shclelmars, Suite 4100
g00 5th Avenue
Seattle, WA 98I04
Uear Jim:
Attached please find a proposal for a joint use reservoir project on Renton's West Hlli.
The general proposal is to zonstruct a pump station, adequate mains, a 12 million
gallon reservoir, and sume distribution facilities to the West Hill area. Pleat see the
map Included as the last page of the attachment. 11 the project can be structured as a
joint use project with districts uthcr than Fenton participating, the project may be
eligible for a $400,000 Referendum 38 grant. For this reason, various combinations of
joint use projects have been proposed Because the project is grant eligible with other
participation, Renton stands to save significant costs in the construction of the
project. A xecondarr bents is that the water sold to participating districts would
replace City of Seattle water and allow Renton to spread its fixed O&M costs over a
larger customer base. This project has been discussed oft and on for a number of
years and, as currently configured, seems to make sense for all part:es involved.
Your review of the project concept and the proposed contract for joint water supply
would be appreciated. Please note that Renton would be fully responsible for
construction of the entire project, including the issuance and retirement of bond, and
m return recehe capital recovery payments from the districts, including required debt
service coverage as well as amounts for the actual operation and maintenance
expenses incurred. Every effort has been made to place this obligation as an O&M
level lien on the revenues of the participating utilities. The project has progressed to
the point where I believe your input an this contract is necessary.
A wrinkle in the proposal is a suggestion that Renton "up front" some of the debt
service costs that would be normally attributable to the districts on a normal bond
amortization schedule. The example of this is shown, on Tables 14 and Its. On Tahle
Id, the capital costs for Water District #63 participation only is .3W per 100 cubic
feet. Since this high initial cost may not make the protect look cost effective to the
district, it has Leer proposed that the initial year capital cost be .17C and increase 2A
v •
•
Mr. Jim Gay
August 19, 1982
Page Two
cents Per year there4U-- for the IS-year proposed life o1 the bonds. The ?recent
value of these factors is exactly .3W in 1982 dollars but does not p„yvide for any real
rate of return to Renton for this non y, However, Renton still would save
subatanuatly under this approach if, in fact, it resulted in a fuint use project which is
eligible for make-up of grant monks.
Your initial reactions to this proposal would be appreciated. Give me a call, when we
can discuss it further.
Sincerely,
Michael J.Mulcahy
Finance Director
MJMucl
CC. Robert lsergstroni, Engineering Supervisor
Richard Kennedy
Attachments
CITY OF RENTON CASH REQUIREMENTS
Pirticipants: City of Renton and Water District No, 63
�196J — 1984 � 1985 '
Bond Payment !Principal 8 Int.) II S 90.000.00 $ 90,000,00 90.000.03
Coverage 27,000.00 1 27,000.00 27,000.00
Negative Amortization ( 13,100.00 I 10.500.00j 7,900,00
TOTAL S1JO,100.OD , 5127,500.DO S124,900T00
CITY OF RENTON CASH REQUIREMENTS
Participants: City of Renton
Water Districts Nos.. 663, 1414. 69.777 a8
1983 1984 1985
—t-
8ond Payment (Principal A Tnt.) I f 90,000.00 90,000.00i $ 90,000.010
Coverage ( 27,000.00 I 27,000.001 27,0P0.00
Negative Amortization/ 63 1Z,100.00 II 9.700.001 7,300.�.10
/ 14 I 1,500.00 1,100.00, 800.07
/ 69,77,881 17,800.00 I 14,20O.00i 10,700.00
TOTAL 5148 4 i $142,000.001 S135 80 O
October 5, 198-I
PW 82-078.07
City of Renton
200 Mill Avenue
4th Floor - F.ngineeiing
Renton, Washinqton 98055
Attention% Mr. Robert berostrom
Engineering Supervisor
Gentlemen:
Proposal
Standpipe Foundation Investigation
Renton, Washington
This letter presents our proposal to perform a foundation
investigation at the site of a proposed standpipe and to
exam.iro art alternate site for the structure. The proposed
site is between 80th and 82nd hvenurs south and south
of the extension of 126th Street Sc.uth in Renton, Washington.
The proposed standpipe will have a capacity of 2,000,000
gallons and a diameter of 50 feet. We understand that the
design may change depending upon the soil characteristics
at tho site and could include an elevated t ik of sualler
size. An alternate site on 84th Avenue South is also un,let
consideration at this time.
The proposed site is covered with fill soils which may extum.?
to depths of 20 fee, or to. Typical subsurface conditions
in the area consist of a veneer of glacial till overlying
sandstone bedrock. The site is very near known outcrops
of bedrock which generally indicates that rack could be
encountered at a relatively shallow depth.
The purpose of our work is to investigate subsurface conditiont,
at the site as a basis for our recommendations regarding
the suitability of the exist'nq fill for foundation support.
or to develop recommendations for alternative means of founctn-
tion support. We will also examine the alternate site and
Ja[aOQSm.a J R,,.,M45 M*4538383 :.tV"m1r»1 w+hT.. Wrath.ry,
!ia4Y.HJK:'�i`• f'a r:x YM'+'a:': f4 lath \e.;:M a.a V
October 5, 1982 A...<1 ,..
PW 82-078.07
Mr. Robert Bergstrom
City of Renton
Page 2
provide preliminary recommendations regarding its suitability.
Specifically, our work will consist oft
1. An evaluation of the suitability of the existing
fill for foundation support, and if appropriate,
recommendations for improvirg the fill.
2. Recommendations for site preparation and drainage.
3. Recommendations for the design of foundations,
support for the standpipe, or for an elevated
tank alternative.
G. Preliminary recommendations regarding the suitability
of the alternate site for the proposed structure.
we propose to evaluate subsurface conditions by drilling one
boring to a depth of 70 feet or at least 10 feet into firm
bedrock. The field work will be continuously observed by
our representative who will locate the boring, classify the
materials encountered, obtain samples that are represert.ative
of the soils, observe groundwater conditions and levels, and
keep a continuous log of the exploration. The samples would
be further examined in our laboratory and selected samples
tested to evaluate pertinent physical properties of the soil
such as compressibility and strength.
A few days after completing the field work, we would be
available to discuss our preliminary conclusions and recommenda-
tions with you. Upon completion of our work, our findings
and conclusions, together with the support data, would W
summarised in a written report.
We are currently able to begin the field work within a week
after receiving your authorisation to proceed. The field work
should require one day. Laboratory testing, enaineering
analysis, and the final. report preparation should be complete
two to three weeks after the field work has been completed.
out fee will be determined on a time and expense basis in
accordance with the attached Service Agreement, Schedule of
Charges, and General Conditions, which are a part of this
proposal. For the scope rf services outlined above, our fee
October 5, 1982
PW 82-076.07
Mr. Robert R�rgstrom
City of Fenton -
Page 3
would be 51,20C. We will not exceed this amount without
your prior authorization. Please confirm our agreement
for work by signing one copy of the Service Agreement in the
space provided and returning it to us, or by your purchase
order or other preferred method.
Please note the space in the Service Agreement where you
should initial to indicate your choice of Professional
Liability limitations.
We look forward to working with yr,, on this project. If
you have any questions or require :urther services, please
call.
Yours very truly,
t1ARDING Ln',SON ASSOCIATF'�S
Rdger L Cd
Prin �1•in-Charge
RAL/caq
Attachments
2 copies submitted
,OF R�•�
� T
• x
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
RICHARD C HOUGHTON • DIRECTOR
>P MIJNICIPAL SW LDiNG WO MILL AVE SO RENTON.WASH.EEEEE
kkP
206 235 2569
erFn atPtt•�.
BARDARA Y. SHINPUCH 1_ RtCrk.IbG�7
MAYOR
"F�,JV $L 1982
November 26, 1981 , r N;sJA,
! rAe Y�f .ft'�?FFtcE
Honorable Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor
Municipal Building
Renton, WA 98055
Subject: Professional Services for West Hill Reservoir,
Pump Station and Two and One-Malf Hiles of TraMnission
Water Main
Dear Mayor Shinpoch:
The Public Works 0eparlment would like In hire Consultant services
for assistance in design, drafting and specla,iaed structural, mocha•
niul and electrical inspection for the West Hill Reservoir, Pump
Station and Transmission Main Project
,a Ton City has completed its final application for state funds from
Referendum 038, managed by the Department of Social L Health Ser-
vices. We anticipate the grant offer at any time, as indicated by
your discussions with the Director of the Water Supply Section, We
have previously Indicated to the state that we can promptly move
Into design and construction at this project upon the Staff Grant
offer.
The City Department of Public Works does not have on-staff porsounel
qualified to design or inspect structural water reservoirs, mechanical
pump systems, nor large power and complex telemetry systems. Our
recent watar/sewer utility budget hat adequate fund resources in Its
proposed band ISsue element to provide funds for the City's share of
construction, " the City's costs for design and Inspectlon services.
the Department of Public Works requests peirmissli+n to advertise for
professional services, form a selection committee, and Interview Con-
sultants. We need the approval to begin this process in order for us
to meet our overall project schedule. Our staff will, of course, keep
your office notified on progress toward formal acceptance of the kefor-
endum r36 Grant, and will request approval prior to any professional
sar.ices fee and contract negotiatlons
The Department of Public Works requests appolntment of a Selection
Board in accordance with Resolution No. 2185 by the Mayor's office.
We respectfully submit these three staff individuals:
I Mayor Shinpoch -2- November 24, 1982
)AJWA YJc Frr+w D��
s
Ron Olsen, Utilities Engineer
Bob Bergstrom, Engineering Supervisor
and Rater District No. 63. as a partner in this project, ties requested
that one of their commissioners be included in the sele.tion process:
Bruce Gould, R.D. a63 tommissiorer
Your review and approval cf this process is requested.
Very truly yours,
Richard C. Moughton
Public Works Director
REB:jft
Approved.
Date: 11l29167.
of Rp
z PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
RiCHARO C HOUGHiON • PIRECTOR
MUNICl/AL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE SO RENTON.IYASH.9110116
2D5 235 2569
'VrED sEPtcrfa"
SARyARA Y. SNINPOCn
MAYOR
CITY OF PENTON
wEPARTMENT nr PUBLIC WORKS
REQUEST FOR LETTERS OF INTEREST FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES
The City of Renton is proposing construction of a 1.4 Million Gallon
Standpipe, Pump Station, and approximately 2.5 Miles of Transmission
Water Wins for its West Hill Service Area. Professional services
required, but aye n't limited to:
Preparation of a Pr; Design Report on proposed water system operation,
size., controls And pumps. Preparation of plans and specifications
for the 1.4 Million Gallon Standpipe, Pump Station and Transmission
wins.
The City's Fair Practices and Non-Discrimination Policies shall apply.
A more detailed project Scope of Work and project outline are avail-
able at the City of Renton Department of Public Works, phone 235-2631.
Letters of Interest must be received by the City of Renton Department
of Public Works, 200 Mill Ave. S. , Renton, WA 98055. no later than
January 7th, 1983
Maxine Motor, Ci[r Clerk
Published:
Record Chronicle: 12/10/82
Daily Journal of
Commerce: 12/8/R2 and 12/15/82
pF RFy
i
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
U "L
DESIGN/UTILITY ENGINEERING o 235-2631
� F MUNICIPAL EIN LDIt10 aaO MLL AVE.aO. RENTON,WAaN.9Eeaa
a
\Pro SE,100� December 13, 1982
BARBARA Y. SHINPDCH
MAYOR
WEST HILL RESERVOIR, PUMP STATION AND..WELL NO. 9
Professional Design a Construction Management Services
PROJECT OUTLINE
Professioral land surveying, design engineering, construction management and inspec-
tion serv,ce are requested to build a major series of water system Improvements for
the City )f Renton. These system improvements have been resolved into three sepa-
rate professional services contracts with project descriptions and Scope of Work
as follows:
i. West 0_11 Reservoir, Booster_PuIT StationP Line, Supervisory Cunt OL System
This project element includes a steel standpipe reservoir at the Diesmitt Junior
High School, a 1,2D0 gallon per minute booster pump station on the Renton Muni-
cipal Airport, a 12" transmission main between the two facilities, and a super-
visory control system. This project will pump City water to the West Hill Citi
distribution system and Water District No. 63 for domestic and fire supply water.
Primary Professional Services are: Preliminary Design Report; Field Surveying;
Water Main; Pump Station and Stand Pipe Design; Specification Preparation;
Supervisory Control Design; Bid Evaluation; Construction Inspection and Manage-
ment and Project Start-up.
2. West Hill Water Transmission Main
This project element is a 135 mile long 12" Ductile Iron T nsmission Main on
County rights-of-way generally along 80th Avenue South, inc,4ding metered con-
nections to Water District No. 63, and umetered connections to the City system.
Primary Professional Services are: Field Surveying; Hater Main Design; Speci-
fication Preparation and Right-of-May Permit Application.
3. Well No. 9
This project element is a new Well House; Panps; Motors, Supervisory Control;
Electro-Mechanical Systems for approximately 3,000 9pm yield well on an exist-
ing 24" - 100' deep well casing and screen. This well is locates in the City's
Cedar River Park, east of I-405, and south of Maple Valley Highway. Primary
Professional Services are: Pump; Electrical and Mechanical Design; Architectural
Building Design, Specification Preparation; Bid Evaluation; Construction Inspec-
tion and Management and Project Start-up.
The three Professional `.ervices tasks may be applied for separately or in any
:ombination by interested professional services firs.
•
WEST HILL RESERVOIR, PIMP STATION
ANU WELL NO. 9 - PROJECT OUTLINE - 2 - December 13, 1982
Interested Professional '�rvices firms must proviie in a Letter of Interest!
1, Experience witn past projects of similar "ature.
2. Personnel assignments and experience.
3. Sub-consultants, if any.
4. Availability of the firm to begin work in Merch of 1983.
F jr copies of the Letter of Interes. must be provided to the City of Renton
Department of Public Works, 4th Flcjr, Municipal Bur'ding, Renton, WA 98055,
by January ?, 1983.
Upon submittal of Letters of Interest, the Uepartmert f Pubiic Works will prepare
a short list of Professional Services firms fcl the selection interviews in late
January, 1983.
The selection of Professional Services firms will be made in early February, 1983,
If you have any questions, please contact Robert Bergstrom, Engineering Supervisor,
City of Renton, 235-2631.
Attachments: Well I9 Vicinity Map
West Hill Water System vicinity Map
CITY OF RENTON, NASMINCTON
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
FOR OFFILE,USE ONLY
Applitat�on No.
Environmental Checklist No.
PRUPu SLJ, dd Lv: _ t1NAL, date: -
Decla'at tun of Significance Q Declaration of Significance
Declaration of Non-Significance declaration of Non-Significance
. - . ' - ' - ' - - . - - - - . - - - ' - -
IntivA "on 'he Slaty Environmental Policy Act of I971, Chapuer 43.21t, RCM, requires
iTl • , •nd local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their
own o Ions and when licensing private proposals. The Act also requires that an EIS be
prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment.
The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involve.- determine whether or not a
proposal is such a major action.
Please a^.saver the following questions is completely as you can with the information
presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where
you Sllieva an an Ianation would be helpful to government decision makers, include your
explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You snoulA
include ref#rel,ca6 to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are vole-
Yont is the answers you yrovide. Complete answers to theso questions now will help all
agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with-
out unnecessdry delay.
The +ollowing questions apply to your total proposal, not just to the license for which
you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers
should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed,
even though conpletion may not occur until sometime in trio future. This will allow all
of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with-
out duplicating piparwork in the future.
NOTE: This Is a standard form being used by al' st,,te and local agencies in the State
of Ua 1hington tar various types of proposals. Many of the questions may not apply to
Your proposal, I` a question does not apply, just rswer it "no" and continue on to the
next question.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
I. BAACROUNU
1. Name o, Proponent city of Rprtnn nopartment of Public Works
2. Adores% and phone number of Proponent:
Municipal Building. 200 Mill Ave. S. Renton, WA )8055 (235-2631)
3. Date Check' it submitted neroabler IS, IC82
A. Agatoy requiring Checklist City of Renton
5. Name o: proposal, if applicable: West Hill Reservoir, Pump Station, Water
Transmission Mains and Well No. 9 Water System Improvements
6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its
site. efieral design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate
:.od, rs ending of its scope and nature):
The Dtoiect emphasis to lriprove water supply for the West Hill Connwrity
served by the City of Renton and the Lakeridge Corvnunity served by Water
District No. 63 in a joint water system improvement project. The major
eJ,jileients are a 1.4 million gallon standpipe water reservoir, a 1,200 gpm
pump sta-iun to fill the reservoir, 2.5 miles of ttinsmission water mains_
to distribute the water required for bath domestic and fire use around the
West Hill and Lakeridge service area, and a new Well a9 to be built in the
City's Cedar River Park.
-3-
(;) Fir. Will the proposal result in:
ta) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air
quality? 01
(b) The creation of objectionable odors? in- M71F y1Ett wTl lc) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperat.re.
or any change in climate, either locally or
n•glenallyT X
YE S� Mt�FBE tl�
E xplanat)=n: No impact It, air n..ality y1i 11 occur from operation of this
wit[ piajD= -•a ter tower. Sans pn tent'aI for cn�orine Leatti can occur a[ .
the well and Booster pump Station, Chlorinators, .Harm Warning and Venting
of Chlorine leaks.
(3) Water. Will the proposal result in:
ia) Changes In currents, or the course of direction of
water movements, in either marine or fresh waters?
4•€'a� Mfi`TF N
ib) Chances in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or
the rate and amount of surface water runoff? X
M_ WMT NZ-
lc) Alterttions to the course or flow of flood waters? X
7M A—my o —
\d) C.-nue in the amount of soiface water in any water
body
YF- M-,tFbt N
;e) Diec.,arge into surface waters, or in any altvrotion
surface water quality, including tut not limited to
temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? y
YES_ NA W NU
IF, Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of
ground waters?
iS) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either
through direct additions or withdrawals, or through
lot a rception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? X
V_ N Y E N
,h' Deterioration in O-ound water quality, either through
d,n,.t injection or through the seepage Ot leechate.
pliosihates, detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria,
o, O'.har substances into the ground waters? X
`M NE
;l1 Redv-tion in the amount of water otherwise available
for aublic water supplies? X
YM iiA4gF NS
Explanation: This project is a new major public water system improvement.
It will improve public water supply by construction of a new well in Cedar
River Park
(a) Flg a. aill the proposal result in:
(a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any
species of flora ' ncluding trees, shrubs, grass, crops,
micriflora and aquatic plants)? X
;b Redv:tion of the numbers of any unique, rare or
endaigered species of flora?
PCS' nAY6E n0
(c: lntnduction of new species of flora into an area, or
i°•. a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing
Species? X
(d Rods:tion in acreage of any agricultural crop?
r E5' v-MT
T. Location of proposal (descr'oo the physical setting of the proposal, as eels
as the e+b.rnl of the lard area affected by any environmootol impacts, Including
any other reformation needed to give An accurate understanding of the cnviror-
tental setting of the proposal):
_ The_Rroj ect elements are scattered arountl the central and western neighbci
hoods of the City and Lakeridge conmunit ies. Well No. 9 will be_built in_
_ Cedar River Park, just cast of 1-405. The West Hill Reservoir will.be built
cn a Portion of the 0immitt Junior High SchociI site. The Pup Station will
DC built in the City Airpppprt and the watermatns w�M be ut t on easements
1. tatlmatcu gate for completion of the proposal: an str e[ s shown on the
attached v�c�ni ty maps.
Fall, 14R4
9, List of al`. permits, licenses or qm re rnmenl approvals required fo, the proposal
(federal, state and local.-including rezones):
King County pi,,mlajrio Permit - Kin-' CQUntY Riaht-of-Way Permit
City of Renton Building Perr,it, City of Renton Park Board approval,
_.CIty_o( Renton_Municipal Arts Commission approval.
10 Do you have any plant for future additions, evpaniloA, or further activity
related to or connected a lh this proposal? if yes, explain:
_.NO other related water system improyeneots of this scale proposed. only
small steel main replacement; and small water system qrid link construction.
11. Do you snow of any Plans by others which may affect the property covered by
your proposal. If yet, [.Plain:
140
I2 Attach aI,y other aPPIIca L7on form that ,as been completed regarding tie pro.
posal; It ^on41 has been completed, but is expected to be filed At sown future
date, dc:cribe the nature of such application form:
_ 9t3P.P�Ir�b ley
I1. EhOIRalMEVAL I 'PAC?S
(taPLanattens of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required)
(-1 Earth. till the proposal result in:
la) Unsta:.le earth conditions or in changes in geologic
substructures?
K
TCT- 4iTHF N>S
(b) O1sruPtlons, displacements, COMpaction or over-
cov ring of the $oli? y
(c) Cha nqe in topography or ground surface relief
fe:%101 T x
TM W"U
(C) -he destruction, covering or mpdifica lion of any
w:iqu, geologic or physical features? K
TM MR N'r
(e) Any increase in wind r water erosion of soils,
on or rrf the >ite?
M
( ) ':ha,.get in deposition or erosion of beach ,.Ads, cr
-:hahgis In silt&tlon, depotltiun vt erosvlm. which
u) modify the channel of a river or stream or the
Jet 0' the ocean or any bay, milt cr lakt? x
E 1+ Wr
,
- Water n�5- reservoir and Pump ststlon const ucf i .l
_
haxe._lLMUCII "civ-1 ion and back`;I I ea tpwurf The const uction_ oro'ects
will i_Elyldg erosion and s'Itat'a cg t as ..ere of n�- t e contracto- wprk.
.a-
(5) Faume. Will the proposal result in:
14) Changes in the diversity of species, or numeart of
any species of fauna (birds, and animals Including
reptiles. fish and shellfish, bentait organisms,
insects or microfauna)?
(b) Reduction of the rumbers of any unique, rare cr
endangered species of fauna? X tc) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area.
,r result in a barrier to the migration or wuremeet
of faunal X
to) Deterioration to existing fish or wil.,life habitat? X
PT NMI qr
Explanatioc:
(6) Nolse. Will ttie proposal increase existing noise levels, -_`—� X__
Explanation;
(7) Light and blare. Will the proposal produce new light or
9 srT e; X
V' - Wr R'm-
txLjanatIon: Some Iightin of the Pump Station, Reservoir and Well No. 9_
rnay be added to illuminate the structures exterior to protect them t-om
vandatism.
Land ..se. will um proposal result in the alteration of the
pro Sent or )N,Md land use of an area? X Vr- 1&'W a,
C_miklanation: Improvement to the Duillic water �s[cm may enco_ura�te private
and commercial development on the -st Hi it in accorda, ce with both Renton
Renton and Ring County Zoning and Planrinq. �^
(9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in
(a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? gg
PtT� Gi4gT Fsi
Ib) nePletion Of any nonrenewable natural resource' _M wrhr Irr
tap lancet i on: _ The new well and booster pumps will require additional elec-
trical power to operate. The construction noterials used in this facility
are non-renewable natural resources.
flu! Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an
cap onion or the release of hazardous substances (including,
but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation)
in the event of an accident or upset Conditions? X
IM EMT wr
tapla'ution. Chlorine leaks may occur at the well and pump station site,
if_.ghese facilities are fitted with water chlorination systems. The City
Water,Sy.t.Iep�figg ale rms,au tomaticaiiv trarsmitced to the Police and Water _
Uti lity in the Bent of a chlorine leak for prompt etnergency response.
lli. Pppyla tl on. Will the proposal alter the loration, distri-
bution, density, or growth rate of the haman population
of an area? �L
PT' N'A�fi[ ur
-5-
i'.:') Witl the pies posU affect e,�sN ng noustnq, or
c ra ate a tlOOand for additional housing? x
il€S' NTv'i[ �-
p'!klanation: See
c13) .ranggbLE le tian Irpu on. Will the propose] reya It in: -- --
(a) WeneratiOn Of additional vohicYTar movement?
lb) Etrects on eyttting parking facilities, or demand Y[S' b 4l Nu
for new parking' y
1ES- Ni'C NO
(t) tsryact upon ea1sti ny transportation systems? x
FET' NZiV'6€ 9�
(d) Alterations to pros*,,% patterns of circulation 0r
mOverent of DOWN and/or goods}
it) alterations to waterborne, rail or air treffict
�S- Ili€ N•7
if) In<rtase in traffic haaards to motor vinicles,
Oicycllats or De dent r}any?
044� ri_-ces. Will the proposal rare in effect upon, or
re sue in a need for new Or altered governmental services
in aoy + i the following areas
(a) f re protection? x
MY UnT N'b
,b) police protet tiuni
X
T NAPiT N�
luI Schoula?
Yh— RWR wr
(d) Perk: or other retreat;../l facilftiOyp x
Y(V YFY SC N�
e) M, ,ntenanee of public facilities, including roads? x
Y1j- RAW W
'f) Offer governmental sarrtoes?
E kD lanat-+un: This water system inprovement project wiii enhance fire flows
and wat&C suoe ly-'QrThe RAU
i f' ih
tank mmy attract v ndalisr; and will repu'r ww' t
(loj cn� '.ill the proposal result in:
U) Use of subst&"tfal amdUpts of fuel or energy? x
TM Nun 3
-b1 Om.ei0 upon 0aISU ng sources of energy, or require
tA! Wre lopmlRt Of new fOYrtes Of lMrgy?
vrr RareF �
g tma tt.n: The new ell and_ boosttr o mca i l l D 'electrical Dower tO operate.
0i11 the proposal result in a name for new
ys3+ma . . r alterations to the follows% utilities:
e) Pi.„e, or natural gas? x
M NAy-bf Wr
b) Cc m,nicationi $yjtorS? x
iTS- Wry IT ilk
c' wate''?
x
NATpf RQ
i
6
;d) 3ewr or oolttc 21nks1
YFf- IE?n''6T N5
U Stone rater drainage? X
J, So1io waste a,,a disposal?
9'iT` AAT'aF No
(17) lijnan Nealth. Will the proposal result In the creation of
my healihlia za rd or potential health Willard (excluding
mental health)? x
TIES` RM
E.xplana ion:
(18) kes n tr s. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of
uny step (-I vista or view open to the public, or will the
Proposal r suit in the creation of an aesthetically offensive
site open to public view? A
YTS 14WY-S-E 14
W-1 taftfon: The Nest Hill Reservoir is proposed es a 53' diamete
85' high steel water tank. The reservoir may obscure some views, but view
b 1ocF qe is minimized as s4o s_n She attached dlaararis. ihe_4ank w(II_¢e
Painted in colors a�atterns to be selected at a later date
(lit will Uw proposal re Lull In en Irpa ct upon the
qua y or quantity of existing rec Teat tonal oopdrtunftiec? X
is�tfna tto n: _}(gl l_�14,-�33L the West NI11 Psxervo'r will be s•ced
_recreational and la round areas. 4e1�No.� will be placed at�
the ecl a of Cedar River Park to minimize its Jimiliact, The West Hill Reservoir
will occupyy some o the passive play areas o the oo
D mm1tt Schl srto—Tee
(to) Ar thee loaiLailNtstc o rtcal. will ttheproposal result in an attached diagrams.
a era ton a s.9n unt arch►oio9 feel or hf sea ri cal
site, structure, object or ovildin9±
Ex ianatipn:
I1. SIGNATURE
E, the undersigned, state that to the pest of wy know1e090 the above Inforeatior
Is true and cowPl*te, it is understood that the lead agency MAY withdraw any decla-
ration of non-tipntNcInco that it Might issue in reliance u on this checklist should there be any Willful misrepresentation or Willful lac. of full dlx losure on my part.
Proponent.
R b ri E. Berri strom P
nave pr nta . Enr glnrerinq $upe ry isor
Dec !E n /9Fi2_
-------------
FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE
Application Nois): --
Environmental Checklist No.: ECF-089-82
Description of Proposal : Project emphasis is to
improve the water supply for
the West Hill community
served by the City of Renton
and the Lakeridge community
served by Water District No.
63 in a joint water system
improvement protect.
Proponent: City of Renton Public Works
Department
Location of Proposal: Project elements are
scattered around the central
and western neighborhoods of
the City and Lakeridge
communities.
Lead Agency: City of Renton Building and
Zoning Department.
This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on December 29, 1982 and January 5,
1983, following a presentation by Robert Bergstrom of the Public Works
Department. Oral comments were accepted from: Robert Bergstrom, Richard
Houghton, Donald Persson, Ronald Nelson, Jerry Lind, Roger Blaylock, Gary
Norris and David Clemens
Incorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings of the ERC on
application ECF-089-82 are the following:
1) Environmental Checklist Review Sheet, prepared by: Robert E. Bergstrom,
dated: December 13, 1982.
2) A,,pli,ations: N/A
3) Recummerdations for a declaration of non-significance: Fire Prevention
Bureau, Utility Engineering Division, Traffic Engineering Division,
Design Engineering Division. More Information - Building and Zoning
Department, Policy Development Department.
Acting as the Responsible Official, the ERC has determined this development
has a non-significant adverse impact on the environment. An EIS is not
required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review by
the lead agency of a complete environmental checklist and other information on
file with the lead agency.
Reasons for a declaration of environmental non-significance: Will not
adversely impact the environment or adjacent properties.
- _NF_fClemens
1�onaTdZlkTson omens
Building Official Policy Development Director
e.
ATe�e� uy on
Public Works Director `
PUBLISHING DATE: January 10, 1983
APPEAL DATE: January 24, 1983
F
Date Circulated: Dececuer leN: Comments due: 198"
ENVIROWK NIAL CKECKL-ISI REVIEW SKEET
ECF - nRa -
APPLICATION No(s). NSA
PROPONENT% CITY OF RENTON - PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
AND WE
PROJECT TITLE: NJ. 9 WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS.
THE PRWICT EMPHASIS IS TO IMPROVE 111E Wh SUPPLY
Grief Description of Prulect:FOR THE WEST HILL COMMUNITY SERVED BY THE CITY OF
RENTON AND THE LAKERIDGE COMMUNITY SERVED BY WATER DISTRICT NO. 63 IN A J TER
SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT PROTECT.
THE PROJECT ELEMENTS ARE SCATTERS✓ AROUND THE CENTRAL AND WE..—ERN
LOCATIUN: NEIGHBORHOODS OF THE iITY AND LAKERIDGE COMMJNITIES.
SITE AREA:, BUILDING AREA (gross)
DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE Mt
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
INFO
1) Topographic changes: _
2) Direct/indirect air quality : >
3) Water 8 eater Courses:
a) Plant life: K
5) Animal life: K
6) %uk3c• %
7) Light 8 glare: x
8`� Land Use; north: _
east:
south__
west :
Land use corifljet5i MINIMAL
View obstruction: POSSIBLE AS A RESULT OF ABOVE :,ROUNDWA-.5:➢
9) Natural resources:
10) Risk of upset:
11) Population/Employment :
12) Number of Dwellings:
13) Trip ends (ITE ) : SMALL INCREASE WITH CONSTRUCTION ACIIVI'ri LS
traffic impacts: MINOR _
III) Public nervicest_
15) Energy : x
16) Utilities:
17) Human health:
18) Aesthetics:
19) Recreation; s
20) Archeology/history:_ x
COMMENTS:
Signatures: -
ona a son Dovid R. CfemenS
Puilding Official Policy Development Director
c ar oug^ton,
Public Works Director
Renton School District 403
Y,7 4t5 Main Aveaar Soui(, Rra tea, Wash ln gton 96055
103 ' January 10, 1981
�E ct��Eu
Mr. Robert E. Bergstrom
Engineering Supervisor
Dept. of Public Works
City of Renton
200 Mill Avenue South
Ren:,n WA 98055
Dear Bob:
Pe.mission is hereby granted to the Publif. Works Department of the City of
Renton to enter the M imitt Middle School site for the purpose of soils
investigation. Soils investigation at this particular location is in con-
junction with the proposed construction of a water reservoir on the South
portion of the site.
Bob, if I can be of further help at this stage of the project, please feel
free to give me a call.
Sincerely,
4-e &*MV
Wm. 0. Belm,ndo
Director oi Plant Operations
CS
CC: MS. Walker, Oimnitt Principal
Mr. MtPherren, Maintenance
OF RP
v.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
DE S,GN�UttU 7v EN&tiEE R!NG • .135 263t
OR
n rg MUNICIPAL lNLOING 300 MILL AVE 50 RENTON,AASH.99055
0
b
�rED sEPtf."
BAHBARA •. SHINPOi.H
MAYOR January 21, 1963
TO. Dick Houghton
FROM: Bob Berqstrom
SUBJECT. West Hill Water System Professional Services
I am recommending the- following firms to be interviewed for the three
professional service, ,ontracts for the West Hill Reservoir, Well 49,
Pump Station and Transmission Mains.
Please feel free to review the attached ratinc sheets.
This is my suggested list, but on page two firms from points 42 to 22 are
recommended for consideration:
W.H. Reservoir, Pump Station Water Transmission
and_Pump_tine Well 09 Main
RH2 Lnars. RH2 Enqrs. Myron Anderson
N.E. Jacobson CH2M-Hill Gardner
R.W. Beck Horton 6 Dennis Mullen
CH2M-Hill Mullen
Blaizer
Gardner
1 request your approval of this short list and to form our review committee
made up of Ron Olson, Mike Mulcahy, Bruce Gould (W.D. 063) and myself for
interviews of the candidates.
Thank you,
Approval --------- - --
• RECE D P.O. No. 32500
FEB 7HART
•
CRft
QO/�a'W/��S�ERa� �saa�
P-1775 mis�+.t� iw,u..
Ic GEOTECHN!CALCONSLATANTS
February A, 1983
City of Renton Engineering Department
Municipal Building
200 Mill Avenue South
Renton, Washington 98055
Attn: Mr. Robert B,rgstrom
Re: Ceotechnlal Feasibility Study
Proposed West Mil Reservoir
Renton, Washington
"h.
Gentlemen:
By your request we are pleased to submit our proposed scope of work and assoc-
tated costs for the referenced project. This proposal Is t- .ed on conversations
with Mr. Ron Hart and Dennis Ftettler of Hart-Crowser 6 Associates and `R'.
Robert Bergstrom of the City of Renton. We have visited the site and re-
viewed a general topographic map of the area provided by the city.
The project site is located south of Dtmait Junior High School near the inter-
section of 82nd Avenue South and South 126th Street in Renton. Washingto•.. 1h,
site is located east of a recently filled ravine and it appears likely tat some
thickness of fill would be encountered ar, sa the site. We understand tie
project calls for the construction of a water reservoir, 50 feet in diameter
and 85 feet high. Our proposal would be ' r a geotechnical feasibility study
of the site to outline the kty geotechn onsiderations for design and
construction of a reservoir at this lor. Our scope of work would be
limited to an assessment of d,e general feasibility and geotechnical constraints
to construction of the reservoir. If this site is selected, additional studies
would be required In the design phase of the pt>ject to provide geotechnical
recommendations and design criteria.
We expect the subsurface conditions to consist of the previously mentioned
recent fill in thicknesses potentially as great as about 15 feet overlying
either glacial till or weathered bedrock, Both of these subsurface conditions
have been observed in the vicinity. We do not expect significant groundwater
to he encountered although some wet zones could exist above the relatively
impermeable lower soil.
The scope of the proposed feasibility study would include one boring to be
positioned w?thin the area of the proposed water tank as located by the City
of Renton. The boring would be advanced to a depth of about 30 feet below the
existing ground surface. The boring would be continuously observed by a Rao-
technical engineer or engineering geologist from our firm. During the drilling
ptocess, disturbed split-spoon samples w.ald be obtained at regular depth intervals
Oe.rn Sstiee{kAmte.l+0rvnwrwems�Ese Us et wAmeV..M'a!V49KW�
P•-117 5
City of Renton Engineering Department P-1775
February L, 1983. Page 2
In conlunctionwlth the Standard Penetration Test (SPT). The SPT provides
an estimate of the In-place density of the .,impled boll. Following drilling,
the samples would be returned to our laboratory for further classification.
Following completion of the field and laburatorc testing we would prepare a
letter report the subctaface conditions and their potential effect
on the proposed reservoir. We would analyze the -iuitabiliq of the site for the
reservoir, discuss possible methods of providing appropriate four-nation suppo,'t
and nxke recommendations for a scope of work to iv completed i•t -,Olw, t+,nt with
a design piwabe study.
We anticipate the scope of work outlined above could be completee ithir, about
two weeks of authorization. we would provide a verbal assessment and update
you ci progress during the course of the work. We estimate the cost we+uld
be between SISW and $2000, depending on the conditions encountered.
Our prrtesslonal service wil.: be pettut d, our findings obtained and our recom-
mendations prepared in accordance with bvnerally accepted Routetchnical practices.
This warranty is in lieu of all other warranties expressed or implied.
If you agree to authorize this work according to the above outlined scope of
work and cost, please thous this letter signed by the appropriate authority and
return a signed copy to Hart-Crasser 6 Associates, Inc.
We appreciate the opportunity to submit this proposal and look forward to your
favorable cunsiderarion. Shu,.ld you 14n•o any questfona, please call at vnur
earliest convenience.
Respectfully submitted, AZE0:
f
HART-t'tiASER d ASSOCIATES. INC.
DAVID t:. nINIER (`:use and Tit a Hesse Print.
C otecl Ideal Engineer
DEflNIS R. S'IETTLkR, Y.E.
Vice president
DCWID'KS:bjf (Data)
Enclosure: 1982 Schedule of
CLarges and Co?idittons
mcHART
CROWSER
ssodates t.
,401fCHNICALCONSLALTANTS
1182 SCHEDULE OF CHARGES AND CONDITIONS
r:YMAI Of C11AYE{—Ow P,MS4.W SVWft.N cna6M m a wo and mA%.1 Mira VINk.11 m f IN Mf SLWNA TM It"a Nslaainrro N IK tP an Sa
Who a1<gryn u' oNo 45CAft
A tir�ewnmay.oMMfomits A +c.on Jwgs a 41 anti 019."axrnyµd-W olMrry dabMp
"9 a owmmMgO,n Pb rw,*v w,a No wed m tN Most KNa.Ma
mps
nor ftm Iokry ron':ro-�SrSr iW.maA TKINMP 30 moor
,rcdYEprcer:Oemlcn K
, 13f w EROe 301Poa
aw wrnws 14 nM mmrn.m 1 Iro lnrY CAN 2S,AoA
Sean Aumwa EngnNe opsl 65111,d vat INS, S01aY
Asset"El1pr�wwmiftoost Y.XVP IN. 3WmPa
1aAn eaWCIEI1dnMKiWNpa1 SS n'aa T ,XbaM aWmrb
PrgKl E."oviaeeada" SO moor I S1copE
SNaa sb : 'WaOPit a:lwr 0.. 'oo laa Crra M,It
S1M En�fl 40 a Lawamry Couftot 30Wrrm
Ery+MenfdMepgt 3S 0qX a rpa.mry AOa
Sella!Ka w 3S'Na Oubr60 Sa.Kai a SWVIIIXbm C.,a.'11•.
U&V%as mdo 10 wromm Avatd a 6rap�eYeM..NT-a-.1-.a,f maid and No bearCa eq,Ka lMr1Y16YKM gKM mww k P Nwt crop"an net tads N A,' 'A:Yaab,a.
mallom, dk A e moompoo dYdPY1 f ftyAww 1"a MYE rdme ne IxIAM n Mftog.
PA"M,ttt1MAT.MUCIWN-[a.m..4be agrdrldMa"t,to wSoa00dealae"feeramwood.e 1011 a M 001030 GM of go revdca aq
Xeratt Sam AN ave to KcemlaM AnA}i At III to aY mod eft Atl Dana ilWV far daYNenMd nrrMrMwaaYNNa lleNld 2Nrarrt
pa�e rY 6AANN 0ayy Aw AN No~maoss b win a a60Np 6aeaMb wom M M MMl IN atwaNy'N fm*Rasa SOL a110NN1M
6nft�1N M=" a -Aft"waMamMMgdl Osgw{�N0 ald6N�W dYNAN
4IN 11ftMaA aItMNMW alaompem,aearl
rW,YwW Mrswn,Mdlftpd rot,".laa aAam 4kaNd YaM1.NO 40 MY I ft rR- soom yNY.pWIA• [d7MMNIgYItNA OMnry
Uy•1wdyY6aaralMNMMaNa MaNee}N(lmrarA Ai/arrA be.wdyddrawdwlwwmvw*w MYr aeI drw lWftjor oft rn
weffy Vmra PMaIber,No ds Sq ONospotbrbKw- StlM r+Y MI M/Wn6gaglf Ea1adM YM 6MA.rMMI /YNwW WM Yvn
Erq[11E qqn Xq CMnI aPNa b gmd/5f Md MKTar.aPl L10wia.M IYN
TEAMATTM—M IN font XMI db Clen;gpmin wmrNean IN f*WI Prot beMdeN%OWtt M A YNeddW,M AY 1N V11 rMNMNN db VoIl.5 aN IeCaa
,ecawry to Cbce a.,net,.aw as m cmar0a nKeSwY to Now aft Polim atd gWMW A wOMMIMOaP MANY MC a MISS to tear•rePKa MWUDm and
A6mniXaan cosh g4lY roaw vaA IaCAYM oat rrciWe mrailNttb s•pnNM rprAWMMMNYEQwer{AUKgw t OerMMCA}60G at 1~raw
tUHd NlMdrpMMrAi1M1-lb dM1 a rAyaLs6w to pOrW.or mw rMrMbM��,efta+Mad ar ereNa,M1.IV rocaam"IN bwear NI ells IN*.ADm5 a s1l1C
MK'Ne wa aft Y Lett N�II�f OIIIy*agar Iron ams6a ro idMIMM dARANY rMA,YrrY,rle0•ab vdroi.ab 1 taco W MIOaAM ro au,allmnm and ca
qeN SNwn M NI IbAe 111NNYC-M.a ardKYm wpm IM nM pMwngN M Id,
tMNT M tNi{t-DdrM ArrdlY ENE/,w eK Y AAnN]rant a M6y m tN w,0 b toe gaaM OdN''1,4",m0.1XW*."moms we.41 yya rwanMq
WYrwwrMwll�nl�M 616f MnLMwrN not rrrcrt6ae.n PXM ma sett Iw mbNM do gPach Ito,root I'm.colo ra lf"airq,to
alalrb b/qry Ilrllr Mfteearaft r awr raN latter Cadem w ed Kienann tr aY aft N OEIrt N w M
Vmt mom—YYKN d ar d W eat dd NrNY do pa rb m sar"m samew"No alrrtaA N aadayis ate,S.Mnnirm a as gporl.nw5 aray.mern ore
Waft w Ipcingn6 qd soya NIa.AAVftNdd,M N SAMr gwsl.me Yblre ar Y*MOM f M ORWI e.Neroa
MOM"Y OOp0N11—AN6aN. 6dawI I opYACMms."I-i aa,semdla,m ovook g6M1 W orre,war mreraew N tilt C toms,S Ailoc,.w,
rrc IN,nsnmm�n choose W Y NASA @~M It""NO KartKartC,o.irr A ASYPara,ft.114=Arm:rrMKdra AM M,mInS aft Ma NNI,MVt C'No ar 6 AssKraM,Mo
III a"lNI rN daadM,rftaA mooft No ftabft.wNan6 strawy i NNA aW{W d M LOBA%I M ea a Ilex 6K.rr.M%
WOUMP3 COYIEMATMN MNMAM6—We N Clow"No warm>n 5 Cm1ANNanm mePNM W*W BIyNYa i L.A&MY rwyyancal AS,aprg0 6t t a "ibb
'M,vn
EDIL LOW Y■NMANCE iai Daepde a"40 N Pak Latta}aN Mr Plows aW 1410111111 sae M Pobcb6 ay PXOK LabrrY rlgylanCN b A coalman a
SSW m cagMn AngM:mk b ale v ed'a N NWdM Nbnry arc.rX I.,..sn ran'Kaw INwa m'so,w wnan Me rrmrn"fad rwl+ma .e apt b u's
,W hoatss Iran And W0111 n.,,t 611 ,16rXY a a'oC1,tan MN K,Can1 xrt n omr5umi ar.w,•e'ren ryr rmP.NaS ae.,b suara•.xtds AN tnml
r o"m ad aaenp X YYaX emhKt P P Khos aYa MKMraEIr'NiCmS.YriMS re:.S a'gv.•n5 nyMN, ni„'ah:!Cc."w nr.'I sw"KMN NIKM:'"'W..,n'lke
nM MPFPW Me.,res Irl pbeaaWl q PPbc1 ua.al raa eefttw.PII wa:wr wt d asemedq to P Wsrri ruma6e Iran am ca.sN wndrry Iw Ard e.c �.m OeYo,d tN
u a.M Vol eerwa6K a 0a m.&Nci,
Lrdlm No too"M{IfI "UNANI rMeaaalftwroballo rolaNbxNOWCr1ldAr Nod wPrreXt laaary mp^amMp a,X pgNisrana sNakr- +a nt uu rtit
60aeppMNdtaaN11r1Kaaa.adl 100ftainp,%arri ft teaommolfoo NOW Ir raWa6Y•aOrNeeaarpW.gmY arntar6a66yn. Neanata 10
aWgaapdNANYNYMAMIgeMaKAM ererr,■MOa.NYa'wNaddasrR AaMwr.MWMsf rrpdM rMNad Polumae wgmf mlk' mNa,Nmit nlM
w Ifwrr I F NNa No W MaBdN.YaI a1M aY A oa ftIM6[INPYMNKE d YaA II�YqN K1ra{d2Yt ft awr taNNMwad NrnralNe Srtr'a anrb6 b MAN
mul d 04 omm"r10wMMas on Pal MaYM11 o$1a Ard Ny6��aoraBrNft•SM.MO.aroftom IRr one"A to cool Gas nN l b
dal aX 6rdYYrd NNYOaqgb NrfdN.w Wroe NI YA3ral 000660 ism maCMK6 MNMaNNYNlydrdYWd MNdiAI1/w1 ryyb INS.rc Ido ar adAaW
CmadaarwM MMIOMIWdYa rM MM pM bbCNms paw iw cwM ara MsaMYaY{WY INNrEeNE AbdrNNdarry 1pN AK adMu
Cr4fa1 Ca4MIMY w abNalw YN dadYM a MIIaI1nM.ar'P.Mn ma,e.pr16 Y d1;4a61M a6NMY d r"�Ar.
M M eNa tAd etI eVlnl MANNA N Mr aM6M NdE1.'INalr{AdKddA me ll Ma}PAla.q,wqMe��yyMM aqf.MlWdl fdAf 6d MNA�drE a NMdrdrga d
aAsso4w IN fla "SodaMia aI-
+MMwaNr6W dNCKP ncNK eMw.MrASYM{Yrpra AaM}NMYwwd16YNMOwar
a AUKMw rrc mdaa,WpadlA eN+NIM�MNd NeNM r+aYddW iNaw>i'wsn,aW MR dYMWNaMSNMaNdMMIr�sMY dsw MaNECAy Nf1
no coo AtSKaw. rc afmYNo iid YIdw owdo 61dYYNY.atwty ANN Md orm WA
osimmdaft6d6A MEom"sW ►
tN cwm,i aa6mPDe'a ra.ya av gMaand IrranrMasa arM ""aAmb Pse'N�V~u$ dw"Wa"Waft
AN We bloom rlftaMaM L�raeAN6d
,wooronce mgam IVcom AAiaKMeirrcrmpm CANpa Vle Ile Afts f+ WMVW Oin YW 61Na My1MaNIN1AaIiwrWaleaNWeee.WMM
cope.NN n,N a Is cmd4ke w,m as ArraN6a di IKemmNma6aa wryss ape^<adagaarda w W61N MMdM.
O ,,rt Sw.c.T ow, IaiOPa,iw.Ana.r E ns:S.Are WA"I'M 12061324IM
WEST HILL RESERVOIR - WELL 19
PUMP STATION
INTERVIEW RATINGS FROM WRITTEN AND IN-PERSON INTERVIEWS
Febraary 8 - 10. 1983
Average Score Ranking
Gardner Engineers 117.6 11
HCWL 177.55 6
SEA 161.05 7
CH2M-Hill 232.05 2
Mullen/ESM 139.75 8
N. G. Jacobsen 139.15 9
RM2 Engineers 279.35 1
Blaizer Engineers i9L.57 5
Morton 6 Dennis 219.13 3
Myron-Anderson VM only 135.4 10
R. W. Beck 214. 4
OF RE.
Q PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
_ DESIGN/UTILITY ENGINEERING 0 235-2631
1 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 20D MILL AVE.SO. RENTON.WASK 99M
m
E4s
'ED SE ,t.p0
BARBARA 1. SHINPOCH
MAYOR
MEMORANDUM
Date: February 8, 1983
To: Dick Houghton
From: Bob Bergstrom
Subject: West Hill Reservoir Soils Investigation
1 have rece,w, two proposals from soils testing firms to investi-
gate the soils at the West Hill Reservoir Site at Di mmitt School.
Hart Crouser I. Associalts
Estimated Fee - 51,500 - $2,000 AO""
Harding Lawson 6 Associates
Fee - $4.200
While the scope of work from Harding Lawson s Associates is
slightly larger. I would recommend that Hart Crouser b Associates
be used to perform this preliminary investlgatian. I request
approval to get this preliminary so:ls work underway. We do need
to know if the lower end of the Dimmitt School site, which is an
old fill, is usable for a reservoir. Our other presently owned
lower site is available, but I need to know if our Dinnitt Schol
site is usable, and if we should proceed with site easement nego-
tiations with the School District.
REB jft
Approval :
1
�l WF
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
DESIGN/UTILITY FVG:NFER,NG 0 235-2631
7 WILL
{ — $ MUNICIPAL OU1LDING 70A MILL AVE SO RERTON.WASH.2e055
J9f Y
P
o9"E0
DARPARA Y. SHINPOCH
MAYOR
February lt, 1983
Hart Crowser 8 Associates
Design Service Building
1910 Fairview Avenue East
Seattle, WA 98102
Att.Pntion Mr. David G. Winter, Geotechnical Engineer
Mr. Dennis R. Mettler, P.E., Vice President
Supiect: Geotechnical Feasibility Study • Proposed
West Hill Reservoir
Gentl eaten:
Enclosed Please find a signed copy of Your proposed Scope
of Work for the subject Study.
The Purchase Order number •^r cnis project Is P.O. No. 32500.
very truly yours,
Robert E. Bergstrom, V.E.
Engineering Supervisor
jft
Enclosure
i
ATE t hr,a,�y 16 14A1 S 1 ' Y O F i E N T 0 N • P.O.No. 32500 _
REOVI$ITiON
EPT•11tility Engineering
. 4Q]LQgg/15,5?Q.32.31.18 S.,__ .__ VENDOR NO.
CT. _— �_ "—_.---- PHONE N0,
VENDOR SANE AND ADP ESS VENDOR "REMITTANCE" ADDRESS
Same
Geotechnical Consultants
1910
1910 tairvlw Ave. East
12A-9530
Y. L)M RIVIIJN IN DETAIL ANCUNT
_ ��egte f,ni yj feas l6it itv �[gdv, Proposed Me<_t Ni11 �CiCLYSit __ __
51.500 and
i
,I
a
OF RA,
1
t�f 7- z PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
_ RICHARD C. HOUGHTON • DIRECTOR
O .1R MUNICIPAL BUILDING 2W MILL AVE SO. RENTON,WASH.9Bp55
s ° Februar 17, 1983 2D6 235 2569
Fp
rQ SEP'E RP��.EIT%t.�1..�.�.
BARBARA Y. SHINPOCM
MAYOR '.9 Q2 l��4
MEMORANDUM cl,Yo F1FUTaN
FRoK 11" Barbara Y. shinpuc'h, Mayor
PIWr Richard C. Houghton, Public Works Department
SUBJECT: Consultant Services Selection for
West Hill Peservoir-Rump Station
Water Transmission Main and
Well •9 Project;
------------ ---
The Consultant Selection Committee has completed the selection process for
the engineering desiggn and construction management of the West Hill Water
System Improvements fO1loWinq the interview and proposal review process
which ended on February 10, 1983.
The Committee rated the top three firms as follows:
1. RH2 Enqineers
2. CH2-M Hill Engineers
3. Horton b Dennis
Because this over all West Hill Water System improvements has three district
projects, the Well a9 improvement in the Cedar River Park; the 1.5 mile
long 80th Avenue South Water Transmission Main; and the Reservoir-pump line-
pump .tation system it is the committee's recommendation that the over all
improvements be broken into three professional services contrvcts.
After consideration of the various film's specific abilities, the colryittee
rrccmEmends that the projects be assigned to these professional services firms:
1, Well *9 - CH2-M Hill Engineers
2. 80th Ave. S. dater Transmission Main - Horton G Dennis
3. West Hill Reservoir-Pump Station-Pump Water Main - RH?
Engineers
MEMO
February 17, 1983
Page 2 of 2
We request authorization to commence contract negotations with these firms.
We will, of course, report our negotation results to your office prior to
final contract execution.
Ri t�ia'rd C. Houghton—� _—..
Public Works Director
Authorization confirmed to negotate consultant services contracts as
detailed above.
�sw�.ay iiLL
ar a�a npoc 1�ayor_. —_— j7aie �--
NEB:Jd
OF sF
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
.} 7.
DE S1dN IUTit iTv ENGINEERING • 236 263:.
p MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.S0. RENTON.WASH,98055
R"'kkk
P
BAR134RA Y. SHINPOCH
MAYOR
March 1, 1983
Attention:
Subject: Professional Services Froposals
West Hill Water System Improvements
Gentlemen:
The City of Renton Consultant Selection Committee has com-
pleted its deliberation on the professional services work
on the West HI11 Water System Improvements. your firm was
not selected for final Scope of Mork and fee negotiations;
however, it the negotiations with the current finalists are
not completed, you may become eligible for this project
work.
Thank you for your consideration and efforts.
Very truly yours,
Robert E. Bergstrom, P.F.
Engineering Supervisor
REB: jft
THIS LETTER SENT TO: R. W. Beck 6 Associates
Hammond, .ollier b Wade Livingstone Assoc.
Mullen Associates, Surveyors
Gardner Engineers, Inc.
Myron Anderson L Associates
N. G. Jacobsen b Associates, Inc.
Blazier Engineers
SEA Engineers/Planners, Inc.
JOB NO. J-1215
DATE !tares;. 8,
INVOICE NO. o5-3.A3 GAEOrEC mc
YtNCALCgtISl1
P. O. NO. 32300
Put.lic Workr 'lepart+ t RE: ueocecluji,- passlbllity Btwp
City of Botca TrcpoMtI Mast h121 Reeareotr
20JKU1'1 Rulldi$O tenon, waph114t"
20'J Mill tlwtala So�[h
Aeatau, We11tl tEt" 98055
ATTN: Mr. Robart E. stwrpet:roR. F.E.
PLEASE PAY FROM THIS INVOICE (Return Sluc Copy rite peym,,,)
Balance FOIWard
Interest at 1.5%
PROFESSIONAL. SERVICES (11;rauAa 2/28l81)
Principal 21yt "r 0,0 hrs $15/ht) t ;,
Senior rrv,;stt .:;+I,iarex (2, 1 yr€ 0
PMJQU JmeiaeaY (.25 lire sl iSolhs) 1,,
5.eniat Staff filvinalrJCmlopi.t. f,J `:rx ;a ;.t5lhx)
S tatf Wh iurar (1i.5 are B e4war)
twelftlst (.5 h" Q i]S/Bt)
Q411rica2 U•73 his 0$251Mr> ♦u
Subieatract iarvirssa
FU laduatriea (drilling) ii
Sereentreat mad.TlbA the 0 12(.
,'SVGA
taplorluaticu , .
eYeaallauaow (Poston, dallve .1
Reut.'as: 1sb .gulpasct
sr:f'xT STf.1cm
Tll L Ww YthP.
1011:01 Wtisatsd ;1,500 - 4',000
lard wd to Date .-_.1u670
talc to ? °'3p
�w �eyl^8ehe.e tpp Feerw
Brbrq i1+nN Fee.aew.We Mi(@_(tg1)i4#SAn
12t5 OW R HART
*C C SER $i
associates mc.
EGMNIGAL C.J4JtTANT$
March 11, 1983
City of Renton Public .arks Derartment d-, RttF�"to
Mmicipal building 'T j
200 Mill Avenue South w, Sb3
Renton, Washington 98055 `` s
At tn-. Mr. Rtbert E. Bergstrom
Engineering Supervisor
ke: Gac•tec bnical Feasibility Study
Proposed West Hill Rest- voir
Renton, Washington
6entlamen:
This letter prenvnts the results of our preliminary assessment of the subsurface
conditions and gvetachni,al site evaluation far the proposed reservoir develop-
went. The purpose of the study was to Provide geotechnicsl input to the City of
Renton to aid in the drterminatian of cite feacibilEty And sub.equent proliminary
planning of design and cunstruction altersatives.
The scope of work tot this study included the drilling of one hollow stes auger
boring and a preliminary gectochnical evaluation of the design and construction
tonsidarat ions relevant to the site. Because the study was ireliminary in nature,
to specific deoign recommendations have been made, it the site is selected, it is
revaara•mded that a more detailed assessment be made of the conditions, and goo-
technical analynea should be umiertaken to develop ue�;gn parameters and
construction tunsidorations prior to or ,.v a part of final design. We an!tcipate
this dosif.o study w,uitl I, c:oot'ufratted with tho %trucrural Aesiane-. of the took
in ordal that the most cost offettive foundation alteroativ,, cculit be selected.
This otady was performed in general "voidance with our propane, dated February t,
198). This report boa been ptepnred tot the ek.luaive use u' the City of Rentou
&W their dosisn i..nsultants for evotifit application to the refsrsmced project.
Tuts"rspott 'box been prepared it actutdanrv. with geserotiv sctoptsd gaetechnical
engias-ring ptwcticer. xv tC.vi wnrtantc, wsprecsed or tmrl. ed, is m d*.
The project site is loc41e3 imove.14tely south of the athletic stack souto of
piswitt3totior High school near the tnteraMtiou of 82nd Avenue south and South
ifbth street in Renton. Washington. the pruleot calls lot the couatructic=n of s
steel voter tank about 50 taut in dimatter and 85 feet high, The bottom attmescivn
of the took in turfrantly planted near existlog sxt« ,alas'., The proposed reseryctr
location is in a.flat dpttomfolo t G"NoRtmatefly thtoo cast bala�� tht pro,!.• of tTMe
a,I,.t.•oni athlsrfe 11010. At the ttma of esploratton shelle= 11 ,'.;1c. =11" e.u.
Lwsar Sr.Mtea.rwee.�q•n•anar A.rratao Sra+e wase.ti.gy,]ytYak'
City of Renton Public Works Department J-1 215
March 11, 1983 Page 2
observed across the depression. Old to. ographic surveys indicate the proposed
reservoir location is as the east side a.` a previous north-south ravine.
Subsurface Conditions
A preliminary evaluation of the subsurface c,ndltions was made based on an exam-
ieution of available topographic information and on the results of a single hollow-
atem auger boring advanced to a depth of 29 feet. The boring was located in the
field by Mr. .Robert Bergstrom of the City of Renton, and was apparently oriented
near the center of the proposed tank location. The drilling process was observed
by David Winter from our office who prepared a detailed log of the conditions
encountered. 4pIIt-spoon sanplen were obtained dcring the drilling process and an
approximate measure of the soil density was obtained using the Standard Penetra-
tion lest procedure.
The exploration disclosed about seven to eight feet W fill at the boring location
underlain by weathered glacial till and slightly silty cast. The till consisted
of silty, gravelly sand and sandy silt and was generally war and Iona* to medium
dense in nature. Information regarding the method of placement and compacted
deasity of this fill is lot available. ibpaoding on the swthod of placement, the
fill could be highly variable. For tW reawon it to our opinion that the fill
soil would tat provide suitable foundation support for the proposed reservoir.
The glacial till soil below the fill consisted of silty sand with same gravel.
This material has been glacially overeansolidatod and is very dense. Same slams
of weathering were evident as a result of previous groundwater contact. The
glacial till, as well as the underlying very dense sand would provide excellent
support for both shallow and deep foundations.
Water "a observed during drilling at around 25 feet baba the existing ground
aurfacr within the loser ar..d unit.. This water likely represent; a rune of local
parched groundwater rather than a regional grauudwator table.
Although only about seven or eight feet of fill were rut*d in the boring, limited
information regardltnWg,, the previous and oxiatirtg topography of the area suggests
that the thicka'soo of fill .could he highly variable acroas the tank location. The
thtckne*s of till it) the. tank at" could tar on the order of five feet can less,
la.reasing to 15 feat or mare within the prevlously esiating ravine ttaaediately
vast of the reservoir site.
� sarrxl.;-RCS �n,.d1Ld,C,nnrt„rpcto„yt Cet+�ldrt;��,,opa
Structural loads for the proposed tank would be a uniform load of about 5.1 kips
per saaare fact (ksf) acteae the haee due to tho weight of the water only with a
c.,u.entrated iwrlaster Mite load at the c1a11. Several muthoris of pruvidine
ta•tniatt" support aatrt and. will he briefly dearylbed. A detailed evaluation
of each foundation alternative should ba sad# in cooperatlon Witt rhu structural
attuinvvr a, part of a desigt phase study.
City of Kenton Public Vorks Department a-1115
March 11, 1983 Page a
Shallow foundation support could be provided through the use of spread `ootings
or a -igid -At. The weight of the filled tank would likely result 'r. foundation
pressures .,, high to be applied to the in-place fill without sir,.ificant and
potentially damaging differential settlement. As a result, shallow foundation
support for the reservoir would require removal of the existing fill soils.
one method of shallow support would require backfilling the zone of excavated
in-place fill with well-compacted, select, clean sand and gravel. It would be
necessary to extend the excavation and backf filing beyond the perimeter of the
reservoir to provide for a suitable distribution of the load through the select
fill and into the underlying glacial till. A perimeter ring footing could be
utilized to support the weight of the steal shell in addition to transient loads
cau�ud by wind or seismic events. The steel bottom of the reservoir would act as
u f.,\able mat and distribute the water load evenly across the compacted fill.
Some total settlement and differential settlement would he expected within the
fill, however, it bee beer. noted In the literature that steal reservoirs are
generally able to withstand settlements on the order of several inches without
structural damage, if the fill thickness beneath the reservoir is variable, the
differential settlmonts could be reduced by minimizing the difference in compacted
fill thickness through overexcavation of natural sail and sub_-quent backfilling.
Total settlements could he mini!rizod through careful attention t,, fill pireement
and cunpactiwn.
Another support method would be to loeate a perimetet ring fo,Atiog directly on
the glacial till. This would require extanding the depth of the footing as
necessary to .,cuuntei this material. As with the previous method, the in-place
fill should he replaced with compacted. select fill although excavation bevond the
reservoir perimeter would not be required, Footings bearing on the glacial soils
could he designed for higher %oil pressures than those located within the fill
thereby reducing the site of the footing. The steel tank bottom would again act
AS a flexible mat in dimtribatiuy, the water loads. because of theme applied loads
tht perimeter ring wall should be designed to withstand the associated surcharge
lateral pressures.
We mwld expo..t relatively minor settlements of the ;ank shell usink this method.
'State differential settlement could Occur betwen the renter of the flexible tank
hottom " the well-supported perlact.^r of tb,: reservoir.
A rikid mat, tou,niatton consisting of a reinforced cun.rety slab may also be a
viable appr.ach. The 3n-place fill could be replaced with either well-
co®gpavted salezt fill fvleaa woad sod gravell,or with the existing fill material
replaced atd compacted as structural: fill. The feasibility of readtly recampacting
the on-site till as structural fill depends on. moisture conditions as theme sells
are copnldor"S moisture sensitive, The select fill would have the advantage of
easier rlacencnt and compaction during construetiwn and a higher allowable soil
pressure which would result in a smaller mot size and corresponding limits of
axcavmtlon. if placed cn structural. fill comfposed of the existing site $Oil.$, it
is '.lkely that the met would havt to extend bavotnl the perimeter of the reservoir.
M � •
iitr of Renton Public Works Department 3-1215
%larch 11, 1983 Page 4
Again, some total and differential settl,ments could he expected within the fill
but could be minimised by careful fill placement and monitoring and by a reduc-
tion in the difference in fill thickness across the reservoir.
The use of deep foundation support for the tank could also be considered, however
at this time it does not appear to be economically practical Based on a 50 to 60
ton capacity per pile, on the order of 100 piles would be required. Augercast
piles would probably be used due to the difficulty of driving piles into the dense
glacial soils. It is our opinion that shallow foundations in conjunction with re-
moval of the existing fill would probably result in a more economical and suitable
design.
We wish to emphasise that this Is a feasibility study with no design recommenda-
tions included. Prier to the final design of the reservoir foundation system, we
recommend that a design geotechnical study be made of the various support schemes
outlined in this letter. A key consideration relating to the suitability of tree
various foundation alternatives is the depth of the existing fill across the reser-
voir location. We recommend several additional shallow explorations to determine
the variability in depth of the existing fill. gearing capacity determinations
and associated settlemee.t analyses would be performed for each foundation alterna-
rive, including the eft,,cts of both static and dynamic load conditions. The study
w.w1J alas) include recommendations for subgrade preparation and site and subsurface
dralnege criteria.
Because of the apparent variability of the subsurface conditions and the existence
of several Potentially viable foundation support alternatives, we feel it is
important that Start-Crow.re- A Associates work closely with the designer of the
reservoir In order to incorporate the mst effective foundation design. We would
be pleased to discuss thLa letter with you at your ioovenlence and to provide you
with an estieat� of the ..oats for performing a design phase study. We appreciate
this opportur., to he of service to you and look forward to our rontlnued rove h•e-
ment in this pr.jert.
SIac PTPly,
ItARI-f'RfrV,SFR 66��..AC50CIATPS, INC.
�fS'Rnw�
W%V10 G. WINIM
Geotechuical �Fngtneer
DENNIS h. i14;I I. ;R, P.C.
i'E'.. Presldent
N;s15R=:lk
cc: Richard H. Harbert, IM2 Engineering, P.S.
OF RE •
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
RICHARD C HOUGHTON * DIRECTOR
$' MUNICIPAL BUILDING 2M MILL AVE SO RENTOIa,WA3K 9B 6
ee 2M 236-2569
RFD sEV E
BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH June 16, 1983
MAYOR
MEMORANDUM
1J: Bob Berystran
Ron Olsen ,
f RnR: Richard Houghton
SUBJECT: Mesthill Tank Site
The School Board meets June 23, July 14th or August l8th.
We M11ST obtain thn nacessary easements A.S.A.p, for the water line
across the school grounds at Dimmitt.
Also, keep in nand we have to Construct the line through the school
grounds before school starts in August.
CN:qnp
Renton City Council • •
9/17/84 Page four
Old Business continued
Asphalt Resurfacing MOVED BY TRIMM, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE
Phase II , 1984 Cont. RECOMMENDATION Of THE COMMITTEE. CARRIED.
Utilities Utilities Committee Chairman Mathews presented a report
Committee regarding the Metro appeal of the City's special connection
Metro Appeal of charge filed on 8/6/84. The Committee held a meeting with
Special Connection representatives of Metro who had suggested the charge was
Charges unfair due to previous work, the ordinance does not apply,
and the charge violates previous city commitment with Metro.
Continued In a letter from the City Attorney, he indicates that the
City's present policy provides no mechanism to credit,
waive or create exceptions to the utility area ,large.
To preclude setting a precedent by making a du tarmination
on the referenced appeal, the Utilities Committee recommended
that Council review the policy on special connection charges.
Continued The Utilities Committee recommended the subject matter of
the special connection charge be referred to the Utilities
Committee for review. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY
KF LK R, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED.
Bid Award - Utilities Committee Chairman Mathews presented a report
1984 Sanitary concurring in the Public works Department recommendation
Sewer Rehabilitation to reject the low bid of Ford Construction for the 1984
Program Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation Program due to unsatisfactory
past performance. The Committee further concurs In the
departmental recommendation to accept the second low bid
Of M. L. Jacobsen, Jr. Construction Company in the amount
of 5221,346.63. The Engineer's estimate for the project
was $245,421.19. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED By KEOLKEP,
COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE BID AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR
AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. EMIED,
Bids for Rolling Utilities Com^ittee Chairman Mahtews prose^•:,d a report
Mills Sewer Tr�mx concurrine in the Public works Department •o.onrmr^Aar on
Road Repair to reject all bids. The Commlttee further recomrended that
the project be held and rebid in the spring of 1985 in
conjunction with related projects. MOVED BY MATMEWS,
SECONDED by KLOLKER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT,
CARRIED.
w-400
Bid Award - Steel Utilities Come, ttee Chairman Mathews presented a report
Reservoir - Both concurring in the Public W,rks Department recommendation tc
Avenue s S. 126th accept the low bid of Reliable Steel Fabricators In -he amount
of 5536.713.10. The Engineer's estimate for the project was
$568.243.67. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY KEOLKER, COUNCIL
CONCUR IN THE 110 AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK
r0 EXECUTE THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. CARRIES
inclaimed Property Councilman Stredicke questioned why the City of Renton and
or Funds Renton Municipal Court are listed in legal sect,on of newspaper
as having unclaimed property or funds with State Revenue
Department. finance Director Mulcahy explained new State
law which requires that a listing of unclaimed property rust
be filed annually, (Cities were previously exempt from tMe
recui rement,)
Money Creek Councilman Stredicke questioned whether projected start date
Sewer Project of Juns of 1965 for Money Creak Sewer Project will allow
coma "cement of new construction being delayed due to building
moratorium. Mayer Shinpoch advised that commencement date
depends upon approval of the Department of Fisheries since
the project effects stream beds navigable by fish
Planning and Planning and Development Committee Chairman Stredicke presented
Rgw a report indicating completion of Committee review of the
i greenbelt Regulations proposed by the Planning Commission,
Greenbelt Several minor changes, including parking provisions in utility
Regulations greenbelts, have been made to the proposed regulations. The
Cormlttse recomvnded referral of the matter to the Ways and
Means Comm little and approval of proposed regulation% as revised.
v r ICKE, SECONDED BY REED. COUHCII CONCUR IN THE
COMMITTEE REPORT.
1V kt.t
T
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
7.
RICHARD C HOUGH1014 • 0!RECTOR
MUNICIPAL e111 LDING no MILL AVE 50 RENTON,WASH.99M
P` ?N 235 ?569
cl�vrEO se vi EMel�
BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH
MAYOR
November 15. 1994
S1049.19 (tOISA)
Mr. G.F. Wannamaker, P.E.
OEVELOPNENT REVIEW SECTION
Surface Water Management Division, Rana 976
King County Administration Building
500 - ath Avenue
Seattle, WA 9BID4
Subject- Storm Water Management Review
West Hill 1.4 MG Reservoir Building Permit Application C84-6348
Dear Mr. Wannamaker:
It has come to our attention that during the review of the storm water
system for the West Hill Reservoir Project, concern has been raised about
the effects of discharges from the overflow and drain piping on the
downstream drainage facilities. It Is the City's intention that the
overflow and drain piping be used only during an emergency condition (i.e..
overflow of the reservoir due to failure of the pump control system;
draining of the reservoir after an earthquake to check for possible damage,
or other similar emergency).
To accomplish normal maintenAnce, the reservoir would be drained through
consumption to meet the demands of the water System, The drain and
overflow piping would have no effect on the downstream drainage system,
since their use would only be during an emergency condition. Should yo•,
have any questions or need additional information, plPase do not hesitate
t0 contact me.
Sincerely,
rITY of RE"TN
Rohert F, Rergstrm, J.
Engineering Supervisor ;�•
. RH2 Engineering
Mr. Richard H. HArbwrt w '
,i • • - System Number:
SO4FAC. NAMED M1tWTIVIr DIVISION -- .-
AT1l.`.'TION/DE^R.'1'f(1N _ _ — — _ — _ _— _ -
_l;h_'lX7i�'fiT'IDC: �. .. project curter:
�l D 9
C,. ., ;,i•;�Vi (DO NDT FRITF IV ?HIS BIc(.:
Plat Name/Short Plat a Dimmit Middle School Petiranent Easement for lest Mill Reservoir
Street Address o 12600 - 82nd Avenue S.
Section 12 _ Township 23N uange 4E Draira,7e Basin
Area Served (Acres)- N/A No. of lots A.crornedatei • N/A
Class of Facility: X Retention x Tetention , Infiltration
Type of Facility: _ Oonveyanee olily ___ Pord _X pile ^ 'rank Infiltration
Facility Characteristics:
Surface Area (sq. ft.) 6,000 Developed Area) _
volume (ctt. ft.) 321 (.67) (storloe requireftrovi ed)
Release Rate (cfsl 0,11
Length (ft.) 78
width (ft.) N/A
Depth (ft-)
Diameter (in.) _ 16-inch Pipe
Numter of Mi or CH S
length of Fence (LF) --
Filter Bag (No.) " N/A
Surface Area of Access Road (ft-2l 9.LOW
Rode Riprao (cu. yd.) 10
Conveyanoc Characteriatics: (Downstream of Control Manhole)
Type: _` Stream _ Ditch X pipe __ swale __. ctmbination
Surface Area of Easa-mt/7Yact (sn. ft.) N,'A
1,ergth (ft.) v 114 _
Rottor width or diameter (in.) -,,.-12 Slope • _
Ntrrber of Mi or CA 0 (excluding control manhole)_
Rock Riprap (cu. ye.) 10 _.
vale* of Faeilityl
Land $- Perm4nent_ inpmvanents t 425,000.00 -, Tntal S-_4252M.00
Easement
Signed by:
Date:
• unless facility O.ky has a cenveyanm system
SlOQ8.19 (11123)
ATTACHMENT 5
WFST Rlli RFSFRVOIR - ORAIMAGF OESIGNf�r/
Development Area � !/^'."•N—
Driveway Area . S,OnO SF
Water Tank • Pavement Circle 42.5' Radius 5,675 SF
Total Area - 10,675 (.25 AC)
Pre-Development 10 year storm run off
1 2.2 in/hr for 5 minute time of colic.
C .2
0 NA (2.21( .2)1.251 .11 cfs
Using vrjanainen and Warren Method
Assume Orifice outlet
Peak Storage Tim -25 * 1762100
Qo Allowable Outflow/Area x Future runoff coefficient
• (.1)/(f .?5)1.911 .49 cfs/AC
T -25 • (3.62/.49)1/2 • 35.0 min
Vs • (2820 T/T • 251 - 40 OoT
• 959.0 cu. ft./ AC
Vt • V . it Area x C • (959.0)(.25)(.91
• ?15.8 cubic feet
Maximum Peak Rate 10 year storm
0 • NA (.9)12.2)( .?5) .5 cis
To reach the needed amount of storage pipe, catch hasin, and manhole
storage will be. used. Calculations will not include dead storage.
Stnrage Available in cubic feet
128 LF of IV CMP • 226
48" Oia Control Manhole (4 FT)(11.78 SF) • 47
CR al (Type 1' (2.1)(3.97) 8
CS 02 (Type 1) (1.6)(3.P) e 6
CR 03 (Type 11) (3.7)(9.261 • 34
CR 44 (Excluded) ' 0
TOTAL STORAGE. GREATER THAN REQUIRED 321 > 215.8
Matisua Flow at 1% slope r,.✓p 1�`'
PPolavlw':t
10" 1.2 tfs
lo lA efs
Both
h greater than pe{k rate
. � f
llrifite Size •e o/,a-,�
Asswe: Cd • .62 ^"
N • 3.5'
0 • .t tfs
A • I,403 In
Diameter of orifice 1 3/8' ^ 1
November 16, 19R4
S1098.19 (10155)
IRIWNSTRFAM ANALYSIS Of
RESERVOIR SITF STORMWATER DISCHARGE
LOCATION:
The reservoir site is located in the upper section of one of the many small
drainage basins on the south side of the West Hill area. The site is
generally flat with the southern ent, gradually sloping into a small ravine.
The ravine runs northeast to southwest for 600 feet, and is approximately
45 feet lower than the surrounding area. while there are houses located
along the top, there is no development in the ravine and it is currently
being used as a defacto greenbelt. The ravine broadens out at the southern
end prior to crossing S. 128th Street.
ORIINAGE CHARACTERISTICS:
An intermittent unnamed stream flows from the ravine during most of the
year. There is evidence that during the winter months, a small pond,
approximately 30 feet by 40 feet, forms in the southern end of the ravine.
From this point, the streari crosses S. 128th Street through a a,-inch
concrete pipe acd flows approximately 900 feet in a grass-lined swal,. to
its intersection with Renton Avenue South.
At Ren on Avenue S., the drainage channel enters a 36-inch diameter
concrete pipe. At this point, it enters the City of Renton's ;tormwater
system l,.ated along Renton Averune South.
Constriction of the reservoir and the adjacent access road should have
little or not impact on the existing downstream drainage facilities. These
facilities ap,ear to be adequately sized to stormwater 'rom this area.
There was no evidence that any flooding, errosion, etc., is occuring along
the drainage channel . Since stormwater will be released from the site at
pre-development rates, we believe these existing facilities are sufficient
and no off-site improvements are required. Further, the proposed reservoir
stormwater detention system has been oversized by approximately 150% to
insure adequate storage during larger storm events.
MELT HILL RESERVOIR - TEMPORARY EROSION/SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN
The plan of construction calls for excavation of the driveway and reservoir
area. .Since the primary di,ection of possible silt movements and erosion
problems lies to the southern nortion of the lot, it is recommended that a
filter fence be placed across the lower portion of the property around the
390' e,evation (see drainage plan). The fence would follow the driveway
and would be approximately 160' long, serving in capture the increased
runoff and sill, before the sediment reaches the sloped area of the lot.
The upper portion of the lot wool'1 have a hens of fill arounn the north end
portion of the drivewav, This would not treat: a problem outside the
existing property. The berm would he landscaped during or shortly after
construction.
It is doubtful that a temporary retention b,,cin would be needed during
construction, con<idering the small amount ur lano (.2 ac) affected, and
its pervious soil,
• SAFETY CONDITIONS •
Plat Name/Short Plat
Traffic Level (check if yes) '^a lor �a �Clitih4.1.£ t� ' .-! ti:idicate aumbe r,
Heavy Curbside
Moderate Middle of Intersection
Light Lane of Traffic
None Parking Lot
Comments: Comments:
Exn!au*,e •tmosoherei0"cen Deficiency (check if present)
Procedures Foll,cv_� (check if applicable)
Traffic
Emergency flashers 30t
Rotary flasher used
Vehicle parked behind manhole
Coned and/or barricaded unattended manholes
Coned both sides of road
Coned around vehicle and worksite
Posted 'yen Working" signs
posted "One Let � Road" and ^Flagmen" signs
Flagman used
Comments:
Used air tester
Ventilated system
Used safety harnesf
cutmeent s:
Plat In sl,eetor:,•�•___•_
t illi?/:10 ..—
rev:''see
H£:SVTTQ:/L't'1E1;'ICN IM:'!'rfOFiY
Page Wo
'own ;vo cOry tz
A. OMtNl Strugtural.i1 seosr to-
1. Catch basin is the proper dismemter. _ t��•,
2. Catch basin is free of aeries. settlem t
or other structural defects.
3. Catch tasin ewer i leveling becks are
grouted in place. v _
A. T-section riser has proper side c!.earsnce
(2' minimum) . V
5. T-section riser is proper diameter.
6. T-section riser constructed with proper
matenals. V
7. T-sectim nser is securely fastened to
catch basin. y
d. Su-p is at proper depth below on-ice/
riser (2' mAnimuft) .
d. Ckitice plate is in place.
-0. Ori ice is the proper diameter.
11. Oilhice is free of debris. _Y
12. Orifice is at proper depth below invert
eles,+tion (2' minimrN . V __
13. Cleewut gate is securely attach d to
T-sect:on.
14. Cleanout gate is sane material as —'
T-sect cn. y
IS. watertight seal between cl�wcsrt gate
i T-section.
16. Cleanout gate is closed.
17. Cleanout gate operates freely.
18. Chain is secured to
19. Chain is slack when clearout pate is
closed.
20. 'hain is of sufficient strength. Y
21. Omrf low elevatim is proper height dbovv `
the outlet inert eleiat.rn.
22. O0.erflw has proper Clearance below catch
basin .cp.
23. Overf Lv is not directly under an open
grate.
24. Catch basin lid 1b solid.
25. Catch basin lid is locking.
26. Ca -h kr <n hart
Catch L..:ir. U4 is marked IIXIWM'. -� �..•._ -"�
2S- a^.7: h. .1ir l-d is o.;r is ant 1.ne.
2?. "at.-h or:;hr lid is as shrn+n .r, plan.
KING COUNTY
B ILDtNGA LANC OEVf LOPMENT DIVISION
NIN A KG COUNT Y ADMINISTRATION BUILDING
NO FOURTH AVNNUE-SEATTLE,WA Ul"
PERMITS 344-7900 INSPECTIONS 344-7E30
P%�rsPIL/I AT ION FOR PERMIT ��LD�Na�ERM�*»Ir-�ER
....((.�////�����LL{{.�]�s�]tt{{Ifi((/JJ�.II �1/�'�(/�I tt�.1� ,,gyp...
R INIORMATg11 O/V Ot�.Si/L! . ,
ry
E N roN L _.
OWrO•. Arr .+w ".0"a s �1
ADORM
L CEO I , I , .NJ I _.
n Wy�MR DO1 RIIIR"mass OR MM[N OWINT TrM M1
—pT—Y Snn ripDi
PROPERTY KNIORNAT101/ OPRMR
Avra
«owS"UNW16" L pp N 1 irRtf T N�w7 o�i1 Now RE 'I"'�' ar T r a gsl"- suaucS a❑
7 RR",F aU
'�C+ Lij
6IL _. SM t \ C TWN
ii " aNIN A Woo L-j I 1 J
aoT aLwR/Q q I KI.•i«AAN «v
LEGALDES`CMPTION GrA/
low,
41,6.0
USE
N
TY UN R R
"EA 1 oLe'. aLO111R TiiP Uc•ARRroA eT O&VO STORMS AMA / VALUATION
.R' E r",Rs «W », 7' No NND« �. MICNASNCAI.
AL
NEE$
P O PERMIT WILOING --
PANKINGSTALLS �^'�� FURNAC PLAN IIEVIfW
w- s FIREPLACE MECHANICAL _
N PLAN TO PUB WORKS t+%
PARKING
SIPA
TOTAL /
PLAN TOP lD / 'PUBL WORDS
._...___. .__-. •�
IN --- ------ DEVELONMENTC01RR06Y ,.B TOTAL
N TO P SU"IK
f LESS MIp
'PLAN TO SNORE lKllE _ w IUD I RALAKtE OUE '
Ss
IAPKINNC PL'KIC N1011KS C V �4r- � R .. ccess STATCAAUNTV
DRAINAGE SN _._ IRS Rill T♦
.._... GRADING.
CURBING LANDSCAPE BONG '.�� _ HEALTH '"'-'-'-'
i', SEWER, 1 ^EPTIC ❑ WATER
APMOACWS -��_ ORO- SBN�K.E.►.A. -- 1
BMO TOTAL � If.AT E./MET Nt(I ON[ [ii lBY
FCZJI3WM,LSA'dA1
�_O�� ❑ ❑ �— NNIIfIW
SSMN CONIpITR)H? _�. a ,(///nJ�yt CI NO
•I'lot1A T UNION,NMn\TY Ur NRJ4R` VNNA T.a LATO DE ME aTATa DI
WAaHINCTON THAT WrORMATIUN TYRMIa«aC ST TRa CONE. 0. ORI A; _,_SSLlt1
A"%% A aVNOKT OF T«ra AML,CAr,ON it TRUE AND CVRMCT ,K VAT«EA vN
caRTIKT To a iCAul •NO COUNTT RlOUIRSYSNTa FOR TN1 WORK O
AJRIai1 aY Mat
ftAW
- i T�
- OWhIR •OaNT.«Onp LpwiAAC�M�NN
CPNTCt
PRECONSTRUCTION MFETIN.G FOR THE PLAT OF
LOCATION OF MEETING: _ C. 1-.., v/- Qe.nFG� rtly;rnr P ( 0)d4
tIME: 3" 0 G DATE:
MANE ADDRESS PHONE NO.
DEVELOPER
i
CONTRACTOR:
CONTRACTOR; (' _r ? •> _<///'-,(L
ENGINEER / / �1✓.,�J 111n' .drR-Gf/�. rttk�hyj .
SR. PLAT INSPECTOR:
PLAT INSPECTOR; It „rr try 51,E �s 3R•z9�/
AGENDA FOR MEETING: CHECK ITEMS DISCUSSED
Temporary Erosion/Sedimentation Control Plan
__ 14,90nd - built to plan - slopes should be three (3) Horizontal
to One (1) vertical, or flatter.
^— j.\Stand pipe with gravel cone.
3. Pipe installation - rocked outlets. 1J;
4ACut off trenches - slopes laid back - Positive gradient.
__ZS- Mud/Erosion onto existing streets - cl+aning schedule.
6. r.,eneral Nctes - If not working, build a system that will.
c� Ma!ntenance schedule.
�L 7 2r 7. Projected start of TESCP Phase.
Camments: 51"4"ti niwl.11 .
tlnderaround Utilities/Drainage
I. Sanita Sewer - Submit a letter to this office regarding t��e
consv ;Lion requirements to be followed by the local sewer
district.
• \ ••���
•"• June 19, 1985
Mr. Bryan Glynn
Manager
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Building 8 Land Development Division
450 King County Administration Building
500 Fourth Avenue
Seattle, Washington 98104
Dear Bryan:
We have reviewed your letter of June 17 to peter Norman and
the proposed King County agreement with Interstate Aobilephone
Company of the same date. Enclosed please find the fully executed
copy of such agreement that, along with this letter, shall
a uthorlie Interstate MDbilephone Company to secure necessary
building permits to proceed with erection of cellular telephone
whip artennas +sn selected water tower tanks for certain cell
sites .o serve IMC's mobile telephone network in King County.
Following receipt of your letter, we phoned Mr. Richard Flaten's
office t) work out the necessary details. Mr. Flaten was
unavoilaoie but we were able to work out all our questions
with Mi. John Rae. Pursuant to Mr. Rae's instructions, we
are provioing -mu the enclosed executed agreement and this
letter, the content of which, it it our understanding, will
be adequate to secure our authority to proceed with construction
of the whip antennas on the water tanks.
With regard to the proposed method of attachment of the whip
antennas to the tanks, we wish to call your attention to the
plan prepared for you earlier entitled "IMC Mobilephone System-
Airport Cell Site", drawing ON847-276 dated Marsh 1985. Although
this print reflects specifically information regarding the
Airport Cell Site, the portions of the drawing labeled "Elevation-
Antenna Mounts" and "Detail A-Pipe Bracket" are reflective
of the method of attachment which will be used for the whip
antennas to the tank. Further, application of these brackets
ro 104
9,S9
` * m ia'd#01s9
201 twit A e fait.Sww 220
SMw.'%A 96n9-4.4
206.21"SSS5
Mr. Bryan Glyna/Mlaneger
June 19, 1985
Pagc 11
and the antannaa to the water tanks will not act to impala the Water
Districts`performence of their responsibilities in providing water services
. .•■a�■ nor will it create a safety hazard. In other words, the physical condition or
���■ characteristics of the tanks upon which the whip antennas will be mounted
. ••aa■ will not be negatively affected in any way,
.■■■•
. .••■u Consistent with ;fir. Rae's request, we have notified the various controlling
agencies of the water tank sites and informed them of this proposed interim
use of the tanks for the whip antennas. It will be necessar\ that we coordinate
the application of these brackets to the tanks with the Water Districts'main-
tenance schedules which will be coordinated by our field personnel.
Consistent with Mr. Rae's comments, it is our understanding that final
acceptance of the whip antenna mounting devices will be subject to field
inspection by representatives from Mr. Rae s Department. By copy of this
letter and the agreement to Mr. John Rae and the various water districts,
we will advise them of this correspondence to your office And proceed imme-
diatelc with working out any other details ne.cessan to allow us to proceed
et the oarliest possible opportunity.
Sincerviv.
Douglas B. Raaff
Presiden,
Interstate Mobilephone Company
enclasurc
cc: Mr. John Rae
Mr. Peter Norman
r ,
' � ^�a6J:c Id'rvCc
7 THE CITY OF RENTON
MUNICIPAL 110 LOING 70u MILL AVE $0 RENTON Serer.WARN
s F BARBARA Y SHINPOC4, MAYOR 235.2590
yp
�Vrfp gEott4o'
July 3, 1985
King County Boundary Review Boa:d
King County Courthouse
Seattle,Washington "Joe
HE: NOTICE Of INTENTION
WEST HILL RESERVOIR ANNEXAI 11.1"
Gentlemen!
As required by Chapter 36,93 of the Revised Cods of Washington, the City of Renton
gives Notice of Intention to annex by the municipal purposes method (Chapter 35A.1A,X*
RCW), the tarfltory generally referred to At the 'West Hill Reservoir Annotation.' The
land encompassed by this Annexation Is located On the waft side of 92nd Avenue South at
the intersection with South 126th Street.
The following exhibits are submitted to assist the Boarh
Exhibit No. 1(a) A map Illustrating current municipal boundaries with the proposed
annexal Ion.
Exhibit No. I(b) A description of the prW)%,d action.
Exhibit No. l(c) A brief ttatemwit regarding the background and reasons for
asking the annexation.
Exhibit No. 2 Vicinity maps) showing tf,a following special dlsGlcts: water, fire,
end sewer districts.
Exhibit No. 3 A King County Aswssor's map stowing Renton's corporate limits in
the apprgoriale vicinity, the proposed annexation, and the number
Of acres proposed for Annexation (provided separately in this
Notice of IntanUon package).
.. n sn.•i .+a., cnw.,we.row
July 19. 1985
Mr. Bob Bergstrom
Szpervising Director
CiTY OF RENTON
hng+neering Division
City Mall
WO Mill Avenue South
Renton. Washington 98055
Dear Mr, Bergstrom:
Enclosed please find copy of a letter recently provided King County with
regard to an interim agreement for development of our cellular telephone
communication sites. The content of this letter is confimiwtien with the
county that we will work with the owners of each of our cell sites to reach
an agreement regarding erection of whip antennas on the owners' tanks.
As you are likely aware, we have been discussing with you the Dossibility
of erecting these whip antennas on your water tanks for an interim period
Of time, pending county approval of our monopole towers. This provides
an ,ippurt n,ty for Interstate Mobilephone Company (IMC)• as a public utility,
to supply their service to the public without having to wait through the
uo:entially protracted municipal approval process.
If you have any questions regarding the content of this letter or the attached,
please don't hesitate to contact me (6274166) or Phillip Oxley at 11K:
(264-5555) at your earliest convenience.
Very truly ypurs.
pater Norman
PAN/lop
enClOSwre ( 'i� r,y;M(i=;�
b ii' m
cc: Mr. Phillip OaleyjIMC
. • • .. -n<a ROP1YalU:Ie e+ W I eat • Twc.')4r A.t dt,..l..:....y;ea • .3.`.4.
afi
� 1^
z
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
CIESIGN!UTILITY ENGINEERING a 235-2631
MUNICIPAL BUILDING +AD UIIl AVE.a0. RENTON.WASH,Aao-.^
P
rE0 SaPTE�
BAR9ARA Y, SNINPOCH
YAVOR
Seotember 26. 1985
S1098.14 (15i5ll
Mr, Bart Olsen
RELIABLE STEEL FABRICATORS, INC.
P.O. Box 9
Olympi&, WA 98507
Subject: West Hilt Reservoir
Contract Time Extension
Dear Bart:
In accordance with your request for a contract time axtensi0n, the ,lew
completion deadline for the &bore referenced project is November 1, 1985.
Please ca,i if you have questions or comeents.
Sincerely,
CITY Of RE14TON
Richard Nowghtoe
Director of Public Works
Z
Etgneerinq
seotember 26. 1985
S10gg,19 (1515n)
Mr, Ron Olsen
CITY OF RENTON
?On Mill Avenue N.
4ftton, WA 9ROSS
Subject: West Hill Reservoir Project No. W484
Request for Extension of Project Completion
Dear Ron!
We received a request trom Reliable Steel Fabricators, the General
Contractor for the above referenced project, for an extension in project
completion time to November 1, 1985. The Contrar w cites poor weather and
th, inabll ity to complete punch list items as the reason for the delay.
Please note that the Reservoir has been tested and is available for use and
normal operation.
We recommend that the completion deadline be extended to November 1. 1985,
as requested, Please call if you hale questions or require additional
information.
Sincerely,
R42 ENG:NEFRSNG, P.S.
Daniel R. Ervin, P.E.
1410 Market Street,PO Box 1180,Kirkland,Washington 9SM(206)827.6400
OF ksp�
z PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
_ DESIGN/UTILITY ENGINEERING 0 235-2631
�' rg MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON.WASH.98055
+rFo sEasEMepe DEVELOPMENT INSPECTION SECTION
BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH OCT 19 i985
MAYOR
October 10, 1995
S1098.19 (15/42)
KING COUNTY DEVELOPMENT INSPFCI:ONS
155 - Monroe Avenue N.E.
Renton. WA 98156-4199
Attention: Mary Lynn
Subject: City of Renton
West Hill 1.4 MG Reservoir
Dear Ms. Lynn:
In accordance with your recent discussion with Mr. Dan Ervin of RH2
Engineering on-site at the West Hill Reservoir, this letter confirms that
the City of Renton will accept all responsibility for servicing and
maintaining thA on-site Stormwater System upon completion of City
annexation of the site. We expect annexation procedures to be completed by
the beginning of December, 1985.
We understand that King County Surface Water Management has not approved
the on-site improvements, and we accept the System "as is".
Thank you for your considerat'on. Please call if you have questions or
require additional information.
Very truly yours,
CITY OF RENTON
Ronald L. Olsen
Utility Engineer
QM 0900�
CC: Dan Ervin
Renton city Council
1/6/86 Page two
Special Report continued
Snow supplies. Me also advised that weight restiictions h6ve been
Removal posted on certain damaged streets, and clean-up efforts are
underway to remove the sand. Council President Mathews and
Public Works Director Houghton extended appreciation to Jack
Cr umley and City crews fa Commendable service through the
adverse weather period.
CONoENT AGENDA Items on the Consent Agenda are adopted by one moll on which
follows the listing:
Planning Mayor Shinpoch appointed Mr. Bill Taylor, 2201 WE 27th Street,
Commission Renton to the Planning Cowissiun to complete the term Of Mr,
Appointment Michael McCloud, effective to 10`31/87. Mr. Taylor, marketing
and sales director for eastern firms the past ten years, is
now employed as Director of Business Development at Lo,•gacres
Race Track. Refer to Way. end Means Committee.
Schroeter Claim for damages in an undetermined amount filed by Richard L.
Claim for Schroeter, 337 Factory Avenue Borth, for damage to concrete slab
uamages allegedly caused by City contractor (12/85)• Refer to City
CL 59-85 Attorney and insurance service.
West Mill City Clerk reported King County Boundary Review Board approval
Reservoir of West Mill Reservoir Annexation on 11/20/85; 1.75 acre parcel
Annexation located on the west side of 82nd Avenue South and South 126th
Street. Refer to Ways and Means Committer.
Tibbles/ City Clerk reported ping County Boundary Review Board approval
Underwood of Tibbles/Underwood Annexation on 11/28/85; 38.38 acre parcel
Annexation located along the east side of 138th Avenue SE (Duvall NE),
approximately 1.500 feet north of Sunset Boulevard NE. •fer to
Ways and Nears Committee.
Brown/Wong City Clerk transmits petition for alley vacation submitted by
Alley Larry Brown and Tole Wong; located between Park Avenue North,
vacation Garden Avenue North, North 6th Street and vacated North 7th
VAC-007-85 Street (VAC-007-85); Public Works Department has verified that
100% Of abutting property ownership is represented by signatures
on the petition. Refer to Ways and Means Committee for resolution
setting public hearing or 2/10/86; end to Board of Public Works.
City Mal: Parks Department submitted CAG 05-85, Energy Conservation
Energy Measures at City Nall; and requested approval of the project,
Conservation outhol;=ation for final pay estimate in the amount of Si4,5uS A4,
Measures commencement of 30-day lien period, and release of retaihad
CAG 045-85 amount of $1,673.41 to contractor, CARECO, Inc., if all required
releases have been received. Council concur.
Interlocal Policy Development Department submitted Planning Commission
Agreement recommendation for adoption of definitions for use in negotiating
Terminology future interioeal agreements with King County. Terms have beer
defined for Impact Area, Planning Area, Municipal Service Area.
and Anrexai on Area in a model resolution to be adopted by Renton
and other Cities as proposed by Suburban Cities Planning Directors.
Refer to Planninc and Dcvelopment Comer ittee.
Release of Public Works Department requested release of sanitary sewer
Easement - easement running north :. . ~ ;?. t,rougi, hentcm, Mlgh School
Renton Nigh practice field at no c,st toRentnn School District since
School replacement easement ptoyided just rest of anq para',le' tc
RE-001-86 existing easement At nt test ty City i.i corjunction with 1485
CID Serer Trunk Replacement. Auwhor itat ion requested frr, No, r
and City Clerk to execute release documt en Council concur. -
MOVED By KEOLKER, SECONHO By NUGHES, COJNCiL ADOPT THE 'oNSEkt
AGENDA AS PRESENTED. C•1RRIE0.
ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS
Ways antl Mews Ways and Means Comm;tteC Chai-mar Hughes presented a Moore
Committer recommending the following resolution far reedirq a adoptiitr
1�
wi I tin H�1 t�cu{iva
Depart nenl of Public l4orks
D\mald I IAWle nA ar
January 28, 1986
Mr, Ronald Olson
City of Renton
Public Works Department
200 Mill Avenue S.
Renton, WA 98055
RE: C84-6348 - City of Renton West Hill Reservoir
Dear Mr. Olson:
An inspection of this development was made on December 21, 1985 by Mary Lynn,
representing the Department of Public Work.. 9ased on that inspection, the
attached punch list of construction deficiencies was prepared,
Within fifteen (15) working days of the date of this letter, please contact Mary
Lynn at 839-n31 with the schedule for completing these items and indicating
when the work will begin. When all Items are Completed, a followup inspection
will be held. If all items are approved, you will have fulfilled the require.
ments for Courty Acceptance.
If ycu havc any questions or problems which ca be resolved, please refer
them to the Inspection Supervisor, Mike Sizemor, at 839-2931.
Sincerely,
1 A 11�w
James H. Sanders, P.E.
Manager
Development Inspection Section
OlO/JHS/M(..:..1
Enclosure
cc: Mary Lynn, tospec'.er
1��:1a\Mm)aaa,tiurNYn MIda11M .N111 naurt�\,1M1e }rynf.{\'Uh rry1{MIW AYW 3N LIr
A E U:rsEA CITY OF RENTON, FASHINGTON
..... ORDINANCE NO. 3973 86/03' 12 00"? f
REM F —.00
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF REVTON, WAS ,N .nq.7,00
At1NEXING CERTAIN TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF RFNTON !s„5
(WEST HILL RESERVOIR ANNEXATION)
WHEREAS under the provisions of RCW 35A.14.3000 :he legisluti.ve
body, by majority vote. elected to annex certain territory outsr.da
its City Limits as hertinbelow more particularly described, for
municipal purposes; and
r WHEREAS the City Council fixed June 24, 1985 as a time and
place for a public hearing in the City Council Chambers, City
Hall, Renton, Washington; and
WHEREAS pursuant to said Notice, a public hearing has been
held at the time and place specified in the aforesaid notice anc
the Council having duly considered all matters and further determined
that all legal requirements and procedures of the law applicable
have been duly complied withr and
WHEREAS a orcper "Notice of Intention" having been filed with the
King County Boundary Review Board as required by law, and said
boundary Review Board having duly waived its jurisdictibe tjprea.ver�
m _
per its letter dated December 23, 1985 •-
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COl1NOIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON,— -
WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWSt '
SECTION I: The aforesaid findings, recitals and deterjana• r.P
are hereby found to be true and correct in all respects; all
requirements of the law in regard to the annexation as per
RCW 35A.14.300 have been fully complied with.
f.fA.taa�.t cEanflutt rM TOR ffm AT Rai►X
City of ftrA R W00140ls, OSP Mp Wi 19•ha
sutarntel sea SasMd 4Ns.w «'M..--:, AIL 11
� 16
ORDINANCE M. 397)
It is further det:rrmined that the below described p:cperty
is being annexed into the City of Penton for muricipal purposes and
aucn annexaticn to be effective on and after the approval, passage,
and publieatisn of this Ordiaanca: and on and after said date said
proprrty shall be and constitute a part of the City of Penton and
ahal'. bt sub+ect to all its laws and ordinances ther, and tnereafter
in P+.r•e and effectr said property being described as fr4lows-
See E %hit "A" attached hereto and made a pare
her.-O` as if fully set tarth herein.
rSr.rd property located on the west side of 82nd
Ave. S. at intersection with South 116th Street)
h SECTION Ili This ordinance shalt be effective upon its paasace,
Cr, `
approval and five days aster its publication.
�.. A eertifiod cop) of this Ordi..anoe shall be tiled with the
4 King Cam dy Couneal. State of Mashing on, and as otherwise provide.'.
by 1nw.
SECTION Illi The aoovfi described annexed property located oust
of Hrorrnct No. 11-1 of the City cf Ib•nton shall bt and cofl;tatutQ
a Fart of Pre:imt No, lI-3 of sand Ci:y.
PASSED BY T88 CITY COUNCIL this 20tt d: y )f January, 106.
biz no
E. Mo:."r, City Crik
APPPOVED BY VIE: npt'OR :his 2Cth lay of January, 198b .
CAAAAWNancy errs, ayor Pro:am
Ap Quad ay t,) rm:
Lawrence J. Walmlian,wCity Attorney
Date of Publication: January 24. 1986
WE51 HILL RESERVOIR ANNt Xr,11ON
Lowy.:A Lcm:1CD"
The "at 293 f"� of the North 190 feel of the S',n 1/4 of the SE i/r of the SE 1/4 of
Section 12, lnwnsrur 23 North, Ranpa 4 East, W.M . Loa* East 30 Net thereof for County
ford,and also;
the South 100 feat of the Fast 293 feel cf ttVS NW I'4 of the SE ,/o of the SE 1/4 of
Sef tion 12. Town" 23 fdo th Rang, a East. W.M.. pass Fast 30 feat ".hereof tar County
Road
r
a
t�
. !. 1!I 91lR1)�IlN
rp � I 1{♦� II �( M1t]4:I lal II 1 t � • I ', . �\ntn Il III�111r1� 11I�111111Y�I�I -1 i _
P li
ItC:NANC6 NO. 3973
C n
II I � i II R`p-:
_r
I.
lu
�,
( w.i 11 11 .W J1111I !. l l 1
t , ff 111 r , l I 11' fall �
1 • S 1 1 I 11,.1 f
% `LLl1111tYtLL11 _ }�
i , • 54 VNgV ! 'WW1111W11
Cl SCN if ,114Y1+11tLW
it
So
Cn'Mi t T
hF 111 ,•
... r .it111.
r
ie1��tl[w1 NTr.wr �,_.�_ 1jjj ,• �.,
WEST HILL RESERVOIR T� 1M1 "� fir
ANNEXATION II` :,1' •" j„ } ` .L'
f TT1
CITY OF RENTON
1 h t
s;.•1� 1' Goo' ,
I M_J LJ L:V_.i
Itly lYumy a•wurk• -
rtx x+ft 'APR 4 ]l
Laputa m of Public YAwAm
tkwk+1 l,kke ,O.rr
Agri' a, !936
Mr, Rrnla Olser.
utility Engineer
City of Renton
%nicipal 3uilliig
20- NiO Avenue iuntr
Rentor, WA 9605:+
K;.: 'icy or Rentor. we. ' 'ill Reserv0`r
TTIFWn-79 MIT-
Dear Mr. Olsen:
0u, off L-_ has ecenAy Deer irfbrsad that ,+ portion of uninc.orpurated
Kip,, County Pas been antxed by vcur city. Per ynur reouest, tht DeveloFaaent
Inspection Section WIS! is f ew3raing the project file for the City
of Rentor. West frill Reserv^'r, file No. CF4-6348, included within Lire
annexation boundarl .
King Coenty will no longer nrovide inspecticn and entorc-wnt on tt,e
Jevek)me :, tc: ensure the ot'ginai t'rmit and ,man uunO
»dta and min,au:^ conscru'.tinn spec ticetiors •re att. dy I;Ine.xatian.
,four C'fy has assuaicd all Adniaistrati•r ji.•isd'ctior on this development,
8asc:. on your f2teber hi, ',9s5 letter, DrS �.:derstan;is you are otrepring
all responsibility for sorvic\?ry and maintatnina toe storrnwater system
at tors site and are acLe,.tinc If - •_ .
A copy of this le'.tar and your letter, will be forwarded to the Building
and Lan: Divi',ion (BALD). CIS recommends that BALD release the bones
held as Su,'ety that the origin. permit conditions woi d be met.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact Mike Sizemore,
Inspection Supervisor, at 839-2931.
&1Qcer.,ly,4 10jy
\ `
James H. :,antlers, P.E„ Manager
Development Inspection Section
JRS:kwg
cc: Joseph J. Simmler, Manger, Development Inspection section
ATIN; Mike Sizemore, Inspection Supervisor
Mary Lynn, Inspector
Bryan Glynn, Manager. Ouildia, and Land Development Division
AI Dave Peterson, Section Supervisor, Comurerr al Permits
•
r �
.Vo 4, 1986
Rst I4NEE STEEi FACIA KATORS
P.O, Box t'
nlympia, wasaington 9RSO4
PIThi Mr Fart ,lion
�uo,i,tt• r,ty of Renton
West Mill (t.;servn,
Nctire of Uarr,nry wt„
Da.i r Bar•
Please rtf*r to out letter to your office dated t!,,ca9,9er 9, 1984 where;,
the City eato-,14d your wa^ranty o6l gallon to,, pa,ePtent. •; !ling and
patching to evae 1, 19Ra, Since you have not prrviotsly had an o;.nortunity
to Perrone: this w,)rk due to ratty weather, we or ectohding your o0ig[tion
to repair the paving until July 1, 114g6'
Please a1St he aware that WFV trees ht•,� +...,f on the rnsrrvoir a".te and
Will fired to he -aiiac1.9 enter the wan an re,pti^tventa aP thr oriaiaal
co•t-act.
01ease call if you require additional lnforaatioi or wish to discuss this
procedure. Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Rif? ENGINEERING, P.S.
narini P. twin, P.E.
CC. Mr, Ron 01Sen, city of Renton
Mr. Ray Sled, City or Renton
1410 Market Street,PO.Sot I IW,K,rklsnd.WaSnYnyton9BtK4.9120fi1827,6400
OT Rr
R 1%'
t M I i PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
DES:uN JTIUTY ENGi NEEWNG 0 235 2631
P MUNICIPAL 11L.tOING ste PALL AVE.so RENTON.WASH.99M
pr
YF5 SFc1Cv BARPARa r. SHmc;;C-, cry
NNrWI W
MEMORANDUM 'ED ?m
OAT`... sea;.namer 3, t*w
TC: Ron Nelson. Building pepatt,aent
PROP: Ron 01W. Utility Engtneerinq
SIN.IF.CT: City Address for Hest Will Reservoir
Dear RLn:
Please Nave i eviler of your staff assign a City addres% for the Nest Will
Reservoir.
The Nest Pill Reservoir property was antexed into the City under 0•dinance
9y. 3013 un Jsnulrr 20. 1ti86.
the previous King County address was 12601-12603 82nd Avelr,e South.
Thank you.
,1
i
AW:mf I+
t'
�i.
r
e 1.� .v Y •` . �.
Y ` '
I
• •
nz
OCT 1 � 15+a
Engineering
October 13, 1986
51013
RELIAW. STEEL fASRICATORS, INf,
PO Sox 9
1218 west Ray Drive
Olympia, NA o8507
Attention: Mr. Part Olson
Subject: City of Renton West Hill Reservoi-
Notice of Warranty Work
Interior foaling
Bear Sa rt
we have completed our one-year ines kti the interior costing of the
West Hill Reservoir in Renton. Several vr1`3s inside the tank are •'usting.
In accordance with Section R of your Contract, we are requesting that you
repair the damaged arees. Please coordinate your repainting schedule with
Mr, Ray Sled who can he reached at 235-2646. Thank you for your
cooperation. Please call if you have any questions ar require additional
Information.
Si nco re y,
GRIN/Z 6�NEERIt{9��R:
Bar Ervin, PC
cc: IMr, Ron Olsen
Mr. Ray Sled
la•,i Ma,kat 5traat,P.O.Box I IOD,Ki,kiand.Washington 98O33i2061 e27-MM
OF Rp
J 1i
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
DESIGN/UT41TY ENGINEERING 0 235 26d1
R MUNICIPAL 2UILOINO 200 MLL WE SO. RENTON,W43H.96066
b
P
rf/, 4fctsw�'
BARBARA r SHINFOCH
MA VOA
Oc.o9er 31, 19R6
RFLIARLF STFFL FARRIC.ATORS
PO Box g
Olympia, Nashingtoe 48%07
Attention.. Mr. Dart Olson
SuNJecc.: City of Renton Nest H10 Reservoir
Interior Coatine lnspection
Pear Rart:
W- have Completed air inspection of the interior spnt recoating at the Nest
Hit? Reservoir that yLu performed in auardance with warranty requirements
for the tank. Th1 spot coating that was narfor"od 1S satisfactory amd
meets the warranty requirements. Thank you for your cooperation and rapid
resnnnse to air requPit for work. Plnase call if yo, have any quPstijns.
Sincerely,
CITY OF RFNTON
Ron Olsen
Utility Engineer
cc* Mr. Dan Frvin, RHi Fn9ineeriny
Mr, Ray Sled, City of Renton
en
> Y,/03PS,;z
Mari 4f �i: TR orb
Nate >N�oG/eTo Sri To Ti- o; Cons.rch
Fc. .c%fion of ;a.rlf r" "M E4v 39t-&,
��brrt ycE/t Fr. Ylon y�/J.;ed h1an E/r✓.
'/t�0 7 Ie•/ 8 2 �rr S t S IPG Jj
�s4sr/ y/al/L L� F/oae} '
R
CITY OF RENTON
rL PUBLIC W iRKS nErA4.T6lEN1'
Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Richard C N4ujhcor. Di;auor
MEMORANDUM
May 27, 198'
TO: Larry Springer, Policy Developmen'
FROMi Richard Houghton, ru6lic Works Director
SUBJECT: Zoning of West Hill Reaerwir
Larry:
As we discussed at staff meal inq It is probably no the approhrrcte
time to zona IAis site.
Annexation of the site Without prior aopr, at from tte 3d:001 Dlstri.t
(owner) was not our greatest moment; and, believe me w4 Nava haera about
it - loud and clear. We are trying to get this clet,,;ed up and if we
continue now with this action it will only muddy the waiters.
I believe we can weather the present storm and flntlize the issues.
When. that is accomplished and the dust settles we can then prrw_eVd W.th
the zoning question but only with prior school board approvel. we
art) not successful we may very well have to de-annex the oropewv
RCH:pmp
cc: Ron Olsen
Bob Bergstrom
200 Mill Avenuc South - Renton, Washing' 98055 • (206)235.2569
Renton Sefiool District 403
GG43.% Mail letese MOW, WAA491ee S60SS
January 21, 088
Mr. Richard t:oughton
Director of Public Worlts
City of Renton
211 Mill Ave. S.
Renton WA 48055
Dear Dicks
Ttis in to inform you arat tie tensor. School District Board of
Cirectors have rode a decision regard).ng ..he city"s Annexation
of the nria of land at Dimmitt Middle School on wtich the
2ity's water uterage tank is loct:ted. I nm please, to c*.ate
the city will not be required to rescind the anrex• tial of tills
area.
If You have any qurattons pletse feel free to give er n cal` .
Tr,ank you.
Sincerely,
Wm. C. Be'lmondo
ca
CC. Cr. Kohlwes
WYP- II "'StoRaGre- Fo-r_� li }ies
ENDING
F FiL
(4000ok Ago
FILE TITLC
14 V I
)41sl- iq 11 .,5ep, of.
� I ceNeQat