Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA90-055 V-d' s'S- 90 Jay W. Deeds 3607 Lake Washington Blvd. North Renton, WA 98056 ATTACHMENT 6. FRONT SETBACKS IN NEIGHBORHOOD 1 /2 Y 14; e .S^• ! � .r �Y � Ili~ • i'� , —:;-iit a, Iti% ., kitit, . 4 ., , , , 1...);:)....:*----- • M ° . . , : J , . . . 0 y' 4._ , i , , - - . , . . , ' / _.. .... . I", - Illimr-.., ' i • 1 - Imm- _ t "I i'- C �•F _ d APR 0 91990 V-o55c- 90 Jay W. Deeds 3607 Lake Washington Blvd. North Renton, WA 98056 ATTACHMENT 3. CURRENT SIDEYARD CONDITIONS. ., . , , - • rFir • . kw, j �F4t It' *e. 4,:„,. '. f. iiiIp, . - Weir 1 404,44 7 - ' 4 _ Ire:f- 1 l r f. t"C' etr ` • IIIPQ -r ! , `/�� _ SOUTH PROPERTY LINE ; by PLANNING DIVISION NORTH PROPERTY LINE 4vXIAnrREtmISION CITY OF RENTON APR-namOr , i)i air.FVialV4 d-ccc-- 9a Jay W. Deeds ATTACHMENT 6. FRONT SETBACKS IN NEIGHBORHOOD 2/''_ 3607 Lake Washington Blvd. North Renton, WA 98056 I lk - 1- -✓- -1:1. . , ' t : Ill -....., .4.il 1:**its, • :.,-,....:1;b.,.!. %, i . - _ 1 '51°' II' 1 1 .1r* - • , 011106‘.* ,---vr-- 1 /4'� It' .,., , 00 ..tea. * ji ?4,. '' , ._ - �~ C .fit.= +f lik 1 PLANNING DIVISIO i 4� 1 : s T ( RENTON . APR 0 9 T9 _.- ___ ,� -- , f___- � �`VV �' . -OSS-90 Jay W. Deeds 3607 Lake Washington Blvd. North Renton, WA 98056 ATTACHMENT 5. REAR SETBACKS IN NEIGHBORHOOD 2/2 'S' • I'r 1 r z' . - 10► ! 1 I % _ - -- '1-7 -01.4•6E414 '-•I 6 IIII, . -.-• 2-> • ..ii'l' ''-'1' c' - - ic.f.,,_„ . ' '' k i'• . .... - .4,,i., - at i - ,4 • . II 10 q . -• - •• ...Moir I ( __- N ..:. I 1-I� .4( '- 4....4 _ __ . __. .... 0-- - -- - ..:_.- _ 4 _, . __ 0...T ..i3 _- r"Urf --- PLANNING DIVISION POMP FR61R$'0I ZDN CITY OF RENTON APR 0 91990 I t s-%016.,1 V C I ti:Ao =I VC d- e3SS-90 PLIINQING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON Jay W. Deeds : •"3 ` q 1'90 3607 Lake Washington Blvd. North Renton, WA 98056 , +/ ATTACHMENT 5. REAR SETBACKS IN NEIGHBORHOOD 1 /2 r111. :ct 1 : fiti . ••-.. , :, -_.61..4 _.+ it , ...� I - 91 oi:.--3. ., -,. —en -.'.eirememprit . ... T ,1 1. ,I 1 as - . 0 l . 1 ` by i :. ? i I \�a. �.�� — : 1 i ,:: .:,..-.1. r 0414t 1 ,,:k1 ':. , ' -.1 )t ! toillir'St_41- — - i ti .: ',It. 1 ...aIlk1 -, El Ili if „, , tx - • -' lilt I" , I i IIII . i 1� '1 � ��lillllli II [ `f { illll �1111 11 .I 1 .loir , — i 1 mum , I ' �' .r , `r �1 , Isin �i I - -. � i J . I ' I W ! a fit' �� • S� \ � 141, - -sr-. -_-..- ___ .„. 4Wita 4 r -o sZs-f" sfrE. Jay W. Deeds 3607 Lake Washington Blvd. North Renton, WA 98056 ATTACHMENT 4. j1- �. lir ig .1.-: :- f'\... . AN, :. , , ...,-* -,..24, Ils. .111k- - ./ t. �•~ `ht. 'Jr I - 1 . 1 1 41 1 RIVA . cNTON POSTMA PLANNING DIVISION AFrOo@ N v�......i....ARVED LL. L#IG1 VED ....n-.....,,...... . , 1111111111111111111111111110w- Jay W. Deeds 3607 Lake Washington Blvd . North Renton, WA 98056 ATTACHMENT 2. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION � , FIRST FLOOR LINE 4 � , in O ' 2ND FLOOR LINE i � o �J� l LAKE t‘8 WA91IAI' l " Q ! ROAD EASEMENT GARAGE I IN : o t _ _ /) / 0 / PROPOSED HOUSE / / / 4 (40# 'MP- .1111.- 91•11!Ar mit 4 ditil° In 1 N . GI r Vall 9 M E ti. 0554. 90EXHIBIT NO. yL . ,,,a, o ITEM NO. Vo d£.6'- 'Po I / I sr�E 1 r------Thi 7 / 7 ---r _ ,, I II I I i i I 1 :: t z%?____P: Immft oC? 1 = aMal , _ _ __ -._____________7 ___ 1 '• • . • '. • • F. . -, --- - i . d,z)us, l _ _ .____ _ __ . _ ___ _.__ , _ ________.--- -- --- --4_ ____________ _, _______ .''.. ., �_ 5 ........ ... 7 -- , • \\, a \.c..!' --(,-- --_ • 3(o t1 • r CA �teop,-7 cialtimo ellatib , rr 13 oi.1 ill ------_,,_____________ 5 Fi I?urp eT; L'"'E C AV,ToRT l�ov,SE -3613 - Zg * . 4, 2P ING DIVISION V A z OF REPlTON ` f �� ��ZE M 0 81990 `XHIBI O. �T r - IVIED TEI'i/I IT �/• D � a,1 r \I OC•lt4,,. _ • ...___:_ ,..,+.,,z, ty L__\.)' ........... airk( / ‘.... , i el ------- rti gi 1 i -4;:-St / ' 4 ,---q I. ..'.;...: ._______._.... . .. , . . (110 2 I...,... , 0 co 6 I / .....- "114.en. IN ,,, 1.... If Is """.". , _ ....,, f ri 1 ODOM": ...A.7...ts.: to 19: arQat -4<i°I cm C:, •-trett6i ./ ' ... ...........— _.--- — •Oh* c' 4 ' U :-.-''.. 4.,-‘,. •- Cl . .., t D t" / 4. / , 4 I \‘it -‘!-- ' Mot f -,t -7/C- i c. (/'. I' 0 z.KEi Ti -,.., , ;44,101•'k Z -- - - • - , 1- I• •I•-' • " ' ' '• .."'' .4 'SrA 10 . I -2005... • . (----) P41 4 * af, i 'I p • 1.914, I.. a)1 r--4 _-- - ---- -:--:::.•-..., at tratc km...1 t.-...-.1 -10 C.C. `- . ASIV .4:4;:,1 S. ' I-rl P----4 ' fl _.. _... ...... _ ..1 0 -• 10 +Z l r<K "; •..: / •: --" f'''''"4 Li...) ;........./at Lt. Ab, N. 1 • -it 4k /ii..s../.... I 'I ._.. ...› . , , Or rill Zi ,v1...q,c. IN •i .,, ..-1-- / j . , C4 Z" ..... cl ,,..) . y ' I; 1 ''''11. 4:0'1(41::) , SA (..' " is. ON' l-- 42 Nik re C)1‘-*1 54, ti,S It,Crl .A--1 Lc,1c 4 c, . 4P",l;‘ _,--.4,. -- X ,.),\NX 'i //t'..\\ / ..k‘ / ,if7 04 agSSO dill1H5 A C!'C '' 1 -..r".$ 'eZ-, / .... -, • •., . , / ../ .•.‘ ' ", - 1 _ RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING .DEPARTMENT: DATE CIRCULATED: 5-11-90 COMMENTS DUE: 5-25-90 SME - 055 - 90 1 APPLICATION NO(S) : V-055-90 PROPONENT: Jay W. and Elizabeth A. Deeds PROJECT TITLE: Deeds Shoreline Exemption and Variances. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicants seek a Shorelines Master Plan Exemption from Section 4. 07. 02 (D) of the Renton Shorelands Master Plan and •• three Variances from Section 4-31-5 (C) (4) of the Renton City Code in order • to build a single-family residence adjacent to Lake Washington. They wish to . reduce the setback from the lake front from twenty (20) to fifteen (15) feet, the front yard setback from twenty (20) to five (5) feet and one sideyard setback from five (5) feet to zero. LOCATION: 3607 Lake, Washington Blvd. North SITE AREA 2,465 BUILDING AREA (gross): 1,262 sq. ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 0 0 0 o _ 0 0 1 2. Air 0 0 0 O O i3 . WaterO O 4. Plants ° ° O 0 0 5. Animals ( ° 0 0 ', O 0 0 6. Energy & Natural Resources 0 0 0 O 0 0 7. Environmental Health 0 0 0 ; O 0 0 8. Land & Shoreline Use 0 0 0 O 0 0 9 . Housing 0 0 0 O 0 0 10. Aesthetics 0 0 0 O 0 0 11. Light & Glare 0 0 C° O 0 0 1 12 . Recreation ° 0 0 O 0 0 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° 0 0 ; O 0 0 14. Transportation - 0 0 0 i O 0 0 15. Public Services 0 0 0 j O 0 0 16. Utilities ° ° a COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Rev. 6/88 1 ---44111111.11111111 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET SME-055-90 APPLICATION NO(S) . : V-055-90 PROPONENT: Jay W. and Elizabeth A. Deeds PROJECT TITLE: Deeds Shoreline Exemption and Variances BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicants seek a Shorelines Master Plan Exemption from Section 4. 07. 02 (D) of the Renton Shorelands Master Plan and three Variances from Section 4-31-5 (C) (4) of the Renton City Code in order to build a single family residence adjacent to Lake Washington. They wish to reduce the setback from the lake front from twenty (20) to fifteen (15) feet, the front yard setback from twenty (20) to five (5) feet and one sideyard setback from five (5) feet to zero feet. LOCATION: 3607 Lake Washington Blvd. North TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 6-15-90 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED INj WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON May 25, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED DATE SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 I RFCE VED'f 2 Q/ PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. yq� ,889 a° CITY OF RE TON STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Mail Stop PV-11 • Olympia, Washington 98504-8711 • (206) 459-6000 June 26, 1991 Lynn Guttmann Community Development & Planning Dept. PLANNING DIVISION City of Renton CITY OF REN T ON 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 JUL 2 1991 RECEIVE' Mr. Jay and Mrs. Elizabeth Deeds 3607 Lake Washington Boulevard N Renton, WA 98056 Re: City of Renton Permit #V-055-90 Jay and Elizabeth Deeds - Applicant i Shoreline Variance Permit #1991-12280 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Deeds: 1 The Department of Ecology has reviewed the above referenced Variance Permit to ,! construct a single family residence within the 20 foot setback from Lake Washington. We concur that the proposal, as conditioned by the City of Renton, meets the 1 intent of the master program and the criteria set forth in WAC 173-14-150 for granting a Variance. The permit is hereby approved. This approval is given pursuant to requirements of the Shoreline Management Act of 1971. Other federal, state, or local approvals may be required. Construction is not authorized until thirty days from the transmittal date of this approval letter and enclosed permit or until conclusion of any review ii proceeding initiated within the thirty-day period. If you have any questions on the above action, please contact me at (206) 459-6764 or Don Bales at (206) 4'59 ! 'lYl - •m- Mar , 'ICP Supervisor, Management Section . !� Shorelands and Coastal Zone ji Management Program TM:dh ! APPRVAR.WP Enclosure 1 �, 3 Z.T•.Y....OF .; . � :::::: : : :>:::>::::;< ::::>::: CURRENTPLANN;INC..:DI.VIS.IO ...�..;:._:._::.. ::......:.............::::::.: FFIDA V F... ERV>>Y It:::::. On the J day of 3,kin,e__ 19 I deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing S\ore.\kv�P_ 1-Q Vvvk lt- . documents . This information was .sent to: Name Representing • Z3o.L . ici_ii.)-±- 0.,_ • __-----_-f___choi,6 • • (Signature of Sender) oi& (_- -Py Subscribed N b"!ip;n to me this S day of 19 c / . �0 GpRET� 4,, ,��• .Q'.;,iassio y G •., 1 • TARP to.m. M . Nota Publi n and for the y PuEto : : Sta of Washington residing '•,�6`'G 9a.-2�.e at .,a 19,. ,�O'� '#e R •"••' G ..• therein. **is�I'ASH�N��.. P: r.o< .e ct .N� ame � - Project Number 5Jfl V> ::`s: }. r t flLED FOR RECORD AT REQUEST Ur SME; V 055-90 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK RENTON MUNICIPAL BLDG. 200 MILL AVE. SO. r RENTON, WA 98055 DECLARATION : OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS ? tTh JAY W. DEEDS, HIS HEIRS, SUCCESSORS AND/OR ASSIGNS, for and in consideration Athe variance granted by the City of Renton for the property described below, do declare `dtovenant that: The 15 foot setback as established by variance action by the City of Renton, shall be maintained as open planting area or ground level patio. Plantings may include any combination of living ground cover, shrubs, trees, bark, or other material commonly used for landscaping. FURTHER, within the 15 foot setback, no structure shall be constructed above the existing grade including but not limited to decks, patios and rear stairways. Any stairway shall meet grade outside of the 15 foot setback. Only eaves, as otherwise permitted by the City of Renton zoning code, may intrude into the setback. THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY: PARCEL A: The South 12 feet of Lot 62, all of Lot 63, and the North 4 feet of Lot 64 in Block "A", C.D. HILLMAN'S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN ADDITION TO SEATTLE NO.2, according to the plat recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, page 64, records of King County, Washington; TOGETHER WITH shorelands of the second class, as conveyed by the State of Washington, a- 1 lying in front of, adjacent to or abutting upon said premises. IJ' PARCEL B: That portion of the former Northern Pacific Railway Company's right-of-way adjoining the 0) South 12 feet of Lot 62, all of Lot 63 and the North 4 feet of Lot 64, in Block "A", C.D. HILLMAN'S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN ADDITION TO SEATTLE NO.2, according to the plat recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, page 64, records of King County, Washington, and lying between the Northerly and Southerly lines of said premises produced Easterly, and lying Westerly of a line parallel to and 35 feet Westerly, measured at right angles, from the center line of the main track of the Lake Washington Belt Line Branch of said Railway Company; EXCEPT the Easterly 10 feet thereof for road purposes. DATED this ` day of Naef' 1991. Pam'=�` 5, ��s RECFEE 2. on CASH :+:4:8,4:r• 00 Jay W. e , Property Owner STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss cou\r YOF i4G-' SUBSCRIBED AND.SWORN to be before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington, residing in Su- n e�— , on theme day of atel , 19 /. • _siosit11I,, i off,, ••••••ot ••.•• • • l, a SAY i Notar ublic CITY OF RENTON SHORELINE MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1971 SHORELINE VARIANCE APPLICATION NO.: V-055-90 DATE RECEIVED: May 11, 1990 DATE OF PUBLICATION: September 27, 1990 DATE APPROVED: November 29, 1990 DATE DENIED: N/A TYPE OF ACTION(S): [ ] Substantial Development Permit [ ] Conditional Use Permit [X] Variance Permit Pursuant to Chapter 90.58 RCW,the City of Renton has granted a Shoreline Variance Permit. This action was taken on the following application: APPLICANT: Jay W.and Elizabeth A. Deeds 3607 Lake Washington Blvd. North Renton,WA 98056 DEVELOPMENT DESCRIPTION: Applicants sought a variance from Section 4.07.02.D.and Section 7.14.01.E of the Renton Shoreline Master Program to allow a fifteen (15)foot setback from Lake Washington rather than the prescribed twenty(20)foot setback. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Please see Attachment. SEC-TWNP-R: 32-24-5 East W.M. WITHIN SHORELINES OF: Lake Washington STATE SHORELINE OF SIGNIFICANCE (YES/NO): Yes ENVIRONMENT DESIGNATION: Urban APPLICABLE MASTER PROGRAM: City of Renton The following section/page of the Master Program is applicable to the development: Section 8.01-8.02.05 Development of this project shall be undertaken pursuant to the following terms and conditions: The fifteen (15) foot setback as established by variance action by the City of Renton, shall be maintained as open planting area or ground level patio. Plantings may Include any combination of living ground cover, shrubs, trees, bark, or other material commonly used for landscaping. FURTHER, no structure shall be constructed above the existing grade of the property within the fifteen (15) foot setback including, but not limited to, decks, patios and rear stairways. Any stairway shall reach grade outside of the fifteen foot setback. Only eaves, as otherwise permitted by the City of Renton zoning code, may intrude Into the setback. This permit is granted pursuant to the Shoreline Management Action of 1971 and pursuant to the following: 1. The issuance of a license under the Shoreline Management Act of 1971 shall not release the applicant from compliance with federal, state, and other permit requirements. 2. This permit may be rescinded pursuant to Section 14(7) of the Shoreline Management Act of 1971 in the event the permittee falls to comply with any condition hereof. 3. A construction permit shall not be issued until thirty (30) days after approval by the City of Renton . Planning/Building/Public Works Department or until any review proceedings Initiated within this thirty(30)day review period have been completed. Planning/Building/Public( 'orks Administrator Date J { THIS SECTION FOR DEPARTMENT USE ONLY IN REGARD TO A CONDITIONAL USE OR VARIANCE PERMIT DATE RECEIVED: APPROVED: DENIED: This Conditional Use/Variance permit Is approved/denied by the Department pursuant to Chapter 90.58 RCW. Development shall be undertaken pursuant to the following additional terms and conditions: The fifteen (15)foot setback as established by variance action by the City of Renton, shall be maintained as open planting area or ground level patio. Plantings may Include any combination of living ground cover, shrubs, trees, bark, or other material commonly used for landscaping. FURTHER, no structure shall be constructed above the existing grade of the property within the fifteen (15) foot setback including, but not limited to, decks, patios and rear stairways. Any stairway shall reach grade outside of the fifteen (15) foot setback. Only eaves, as otherwise permitted by the City of Renton zoning code, may intrude into the ' setback. Date Signature of Authorized Department Official cc: D.O.E., NW District Office Attorney General's Office City of Renton, Development Services Division City of Renton,Transportation Systems City of Renton, Utility Systems Applicant chsi ihrI v ;; ` -1 CIT' OF RENTON { Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttman,Administrator April 2, 1991 Jay W. Deeds 3607 Lake Washington Blvd. North Renton, WA 98056 Subject: Restrictive Covenants File #SME; V-055-90 Location: 3607 Lake Washington Blvd. North Dear Mr. Deeds: The City Attorney, Larry Warren, has reviewed your restrictive covenant which was submitted on March 22, 1991 and suggests the following changes be made: 1. In the fourth line of the actual covenant, it states that "no structure shall be constructed above the existing grade of the property" . Mr. Warren says that this would prohibit any structure above the existing grade of the entire parcel of property, while the actual reference is to the fifteen foot setback area. 2 . At the same point in the restrictive covenant, the Hearing Examiner's language should be added, i.e. "including but not limited to decks, patios and rear stairways" and "any stairway shall reach grade outside of the fifteen foot setback" . I am returning the March 22 , 1991 restrictive covenant to you for revision. When we receive the revised restrictive covenant, we will continue to process your Shoreline Exemption Permit. Sincerely, Mary Savela Project Manager 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS . I JAY W. DEEDS, HIS HEIRS, SUCCESSORS AND/OR ASSIGNS, for and in consideration of the I, variance granted by the City of Renton for the property described below, do declare and covenant that: The 15 foot setback as established by variance action by the City of Renton, shall be maintained as open planting area or ground level patio. Plantings may include any combination of living ground cover, shrubs, trees, bark, or other material commonly used for landscaping. FURTHER, no structure shall be constructed above the existing grade of the property. Only eves, as otherwise permitted by the City of Renton zoning code, may intrude into the setback. THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY: PARCEL Az The South 12 feet of Lot 62, all of Lot 63, and the North 4 feet of Lot 64 in Block "A", C.D. HILLMAN'S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN ADDITION TO SEATTLE NO.2, according to I, the plat recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, page 64, records of King County, Washington; ' TOGETHER WITH shorelands of the second class, as conveyed by the State of Washington, lying in front of, adjacent to or abutting upon said premises. PARCEL B: • That portion of the former Northern Pacific Railway Company's right-of-way adjoining the South 12 feet of Lot 62, all of Lot 63 and the North 4 feet of Lot 64, In Block "A", C.D. !' HILLMAN'S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN ADDITION TO SEATTLE NO.2,according to the plat recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, page 64, records of King County, Washington, and lying between the Northerly and Southerly lines of said premises produced Easterly, and lying Westerly of a line parallel to and 35 feet Westerly, measured at right angles, from the • center line of the main track of the Lake Washington Belt Line Branch of said Railway Company; EXCEPT the Easterly 10 feet thereof for road purposes. DATED this 2.2— day of March, 1991. (i0 i Jay W. eeds, Property Owner STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss COUIVfYOF KuI ) me, allotary P is SUBSCRIBED AN SWORN to be before , in and for the State of Washington, residing in,/ tic.[& , on theme day of , 19 9/ „ ........ a • �Go• Notar blic tiornRY 1 Pu8UG S Z: -1""et : 5ME. 7 Y--05S- 70 • 6 Q, CITY OF RENTON Office of the City Attorney Earl Clymer, Mayor ! Lawrence J. Warren. PLANNING DIVISION CITY GI:RENTON March 26, 1991mAR 7 7 1991 TO: Mary Savela, Assistant Planner REC W ED FROM: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RE: ' Restrictive Covenants for Deeds Property, File #V-055-90 Dear Ms . Savela: The language in the restrictive covenant generally mirrors the hearing examiner's requirements. However, I see three problems with the Declaration of Restrictive Covenants : 1. In the fourth line of the actual covenant itself is a ' reference, at the very end of the sentence, to the existing grade of the property. That reference is improper as it would prohibit any structure above the existing grade of the entire parcel of property, when I think the reference must be to the 15 foot setback property. 2 . At the same point in , the restrictive covenant it would be wise to include the examiner's language, "including but not limited to decks, patios and rear stairways. " 3 . Finally,, at ' the same spot it would be advisable to include the hearing examiner's language, "any stairway shall reach grade outside of the 15 foot setback. " With those changes the covenant could be approved as to legal form. Lawrence J. Warren LJW:as . cc: Mayor Clymer , A8 . 68 :07 . Post Office Box 626- 100 S 2nd Street-Renton,Washington 98057- (206) 255-8678 ti ii I• MEMORANDUM Date: March 22, 1991 To: Larry Warren City Attorney II From: Mary Savela 7778 Assistant Planner Subject: Restrictive Covenant for Deeds Property File #V-055-90 Location: '3607 Lake Washington Blvd. North . a Enclosed is a copy of a restrictive covenant submitted today by Jay Deeds for the above referenced property. The covenant was required by Fred Kaufman, Hearing Examiner, in a letter of reconsideration he sent to Mr. Deeds on November 14, 1990. In his letter, Mr. Kaufman states: "You will be required to execute restrictive covenants that provide that the 15 foot setback will be maintained as landscaped open yard or ground level patio. This will mean that no structure can be erected above the natural grade of the property - including but not limited to decks, patios and rear stairways. Only eaves, as otherwise permitted by code, may intrude into the setback. Any stairway shall reach. grade outside of the 15 foot setback. " Please review the enclosed covenant for form. I also would like your opinion as to whether the wording of the covenant adequately refledts Mr. Kaufman's decision. 'I note that the word "eaves" is misspelled. I, Thank you for your help with this matter. • `I II % '. CIT' . OF RENTON sal I N. Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttman,Administrator February 15, 1991 Jay W. Deeds 3607 Lake Washington Blvd. North Renton, WA 98056 Subject: Substantial Shoreline .Berm File #V-055-90 Location: 3607 Lake Washington Blvd. North Dear Mr. Deeds: The City of Renton Planning/Building/Public Works Department was informed yesterday by the Washington State Department of Ecology that your request for a Substantial Shoreline Permit to build a new single-family residence on the above referenced property cannot be issued until the restrictive covenants are approved by the City and registered with King County. Please submit restrictive covenants as described in the Hearing Examiner's November 14, 1990 letter to you. When Mr. Kaufman modified his original decision regarding the Shoreline Variance you had requested, he conditioned the granting of the variance as follows: "It will be necessary to limit all constructed improvements to assure that they abide by the fifteen foot (15' ) setback. Therefore, while the variance will be granted, it will be conditioned to assure that no further intrusions into the setback occur. You will be required to execute restrictive covenants that provide that the 15' setback will be maintained as landscaped open yard or ground level patio. This will mean that no structure can be erected above the natural grade of the property - including, but not limited to decks, patios and rear stairways Only eaves, as otherwise permitted by code, may intrude into the setback. Any stairway shall reach grade outside of the 15' setback. " When we receive your restrictive covenants as outlined above, we will review them for accuracy, the City's attorney will review them for form, and when they meet all requirements, the City will file them with King County. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 As required by Washington State Code (WAC 173-14-090) , copies of the original application, affidavit of public notice, site plan, vicinity map, permit, and final order (including restrictive covenants) will be filed with the Washington State Department of Ecology and the Attorney General. We will continue to process your application after we receive the restrictive covenants required by the Hearing Examiner's decision. Sincerely, Mary Lynne Myer Senior Environmental Planner MLM/MBS ' 40. CITY OF RENTON ..11 Hearing Examiner Earl Clymer, Mayor Fred J. Kaufman December 21, 1990 Jay W. Deeds 3607 Lake Washington Blvd. North Renton, WA 98056 RE: Variance Requests File No. V-055-90 Dear Mr. Deeds: The Examiner' s Report regarding the referenced application which was published October 23 , 1990 has not been appealed within the 14-day period established by ordinance. Therefore, this matter ; is considered final and is being transmitted to the City Clerk this date for filing. Please feel free to contact this office if further assistance or information is required. Sincerely, • X-71- S -L� �- •-•-r)/ FRED J. KAUFMAN HEARING EXAMINER FJK:dk cc: City Clerk Building Division Planning Division • .. .. 1r% :T.__, • _ _ nnncc inns\ nnc ncn7 t '' ;= CITY OF RENTON Hearing Examiner Earl Clymer, Mayor Fred J.Kaufman • November 14, 1990 Jay W. Deeds 3607 Lake Washington Blvd. North Renton, WA 98056 Re: Request for Reconsideration File No: V-055-90 Dear Mr. Deeds: • I have reviewed your request for reconsideration. First, this office appreciates your withdrawing the. request for'a zero (0) sideyard setback. Finally, it seems appropriate to review the shoreline variance denial. I have determined that sufficient hardships do indeed exist to allow the variance for a 15 foot setback from Lake Washington. The primary hardship is the relatively limited upland area and the fact that existing construction already intruded into the setback. With this issue aside, there remains the necessity of showing some measure of fidelity to the Shoreline Master Program. It will be necessary to limit all constructed improvements to assure that they abide by the 15 foot setback. Therefore, while the variance will be granted, it will be conditioned to assure that no further intrusions into the setback occur. You will be required to execute restrictive convenants that provide that the 15 foot setback will be maintained as landscaped open yard or ground level patio. This will mean that no structure can be erected above the natural grade of the property - including but not limited to decks, patios and rear stairways. Only eaves, as otherwise permitted by'code, may intrude into the setback. Any stairway shall reach grade outside of the 15 foot setback. Obviously, a sensitive design should have no trouble satisfying these requirements. To provide you with additional time for review of this reconsideration response, the appeal period for this proposal will be extended to 5:00 P.M.,-November 28, 1990. If this office can be of further assistance, please free to make contact. Sincerely, FRED J. KA FMAN HEARING EXAMINER cc: All Parties of Record All Parties of Staff 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2593 RECEIVE6 Renton,Washington N 0 V 5 1990 November 2, 1990 CITY OF RE TOil HEARING EXAMINER SUBJECT: Reconsideration of Rear Yard Setback Decision in File No. V-055-90 REFERENCE: a) City of Renton File No. V-055-90,Jay W. and Elizabeth A.Deeds applicants for Rear,Side,and Front Yard Variances b) Hearing Examiner's Report and Decision for same File No. TO: Renton Hearing Examiner Dear Mr. Kaufman Due primarily to a change in Staff recommendation on the rear yard variance on the day of the hearing,errors in facts stated in both the reference documents, and following consultation with a professional Land Use Planner,I request that you please reconsider my application for a rear yard setback of 15 feet. A hand written amendment to Staff recommendation for the rear yard setback was provided to me in the hearing chambers on October 9, 1990. This amendment changed the recommendation from approval to denial. This late change did not allow sufficient time for me to prepare rebuttal statements and produce data for the hearing,including amendments to the requests. I feel that Renton Planning Staff did not give me the same consideration in preparing the Staff Report and presentation as is given to other variance applicants. This was very obvious on the date of the hearing for my variance applications. The Staff representative in the hearing ahead of mine had obviously worked closely with the applicant and offered no surprises to the applicant during the hearing. The Staff member presenting my application to you ,Mary Sevala,had not once contacted me since I filed the applications in early April 1990. Her words were essentially,"don't call me, I'll call you." I also wish to amend my variance application and eliminate the request for the zero side yard setback on the north property line. I agree that it is not in the best interests of me,my neighbor,or the City of Renton. A summary of my variance request follows: Original Examiners Revised Applicant/ Request Report Request Examiners Agreement Front Yard 5 feet 5 feet 5 feet Applicant agrees with Examiners report for acceptance. Side Yard 5 feet 0 feet 0 feet Applicant agrees with Examiner and withdraws request. �I Rear Yard 15 feet 20 feet 15 feet Applicant requests Examiners reconsideration. c - After consulting with a professional planner,Mr.Robert W.Thorpe, the issues of the rear yard, shoreline variance seem to boil down to fairness and determination of hardship. A copy of Mr.Thorpe's analysis is attached. I hope that the following discussions and analysis will persuade you to grant the 15 feet rear yard setback as requested. I believe that it is also important to consider each variance request separately and not treat them as a total package. Let's first address the hardship issue. As we all have certainly agreed in the referenced documents, the lot being discussed is small,of irregular shape,bounded on.the west and east by the lake shoreline and road easement,and has a large area under water. This lot also is very narrow,being 35 feet in width while most other lots in the area are at least 45 feet in width. These limitations and hardships are not self-created, but have been in existence since before the property was annexed in 1959. The house is a remodeled beach cabin,parts of which are 75 years old,and has reached the practical limit for remodeling and improving. The buildable area of the portion of the lot which is not underwater is 2465 square feet without accounting for setbacks. Setbacks as outlined in the reference b)report would reduce the buildable area to 944 square feet or 38 % of the buildable area. Approving the rear yard setback to 15 feet as requested would increase the buildable area to 1071 square feet or 43% of the buildable area. Strict enforcement of the setback requirements would interfere with reasonable utilization of the property. An error appears in the Hearing Examiner's Report on page 3 item 16. Both of Burdick's lots are 69 to 72 feet deep by 45 feet wide, not 45 feet deep. (I have personally inspected the Burdick properties and the bulkhead does not have the jog in it as indicated in his drawing.) I believe that the prospective portrayed by this transposition in numbers is significant. The Burdick case very closely parallels my situation. Also item 16 mentions that one of Burdick's variances was denied. Yes it was,but his request was for 14 feet and he was granted 15 feet. A summary of the Burdick decisions follows: 3709 Lk.Wash. Blvd.N- ask for and received 15 feet rear yard setback. - ask for and received 2 feet front yard setback. 3711 Lk.Wash. Blvd. N. - ask for 14 feet and received 15 feet rear yard setback. - ask for 2 feet and received 5 feet front yard setback A little history on Mr. Burdick may also be of interest and contribute to the fairness issue. Mr. Burdick purchased a 90 feet wide lot on which a single family residence existed,with the intent of removing the existing house and dividing the lot into two parcels on which two houses would be built. Through the variance process he was granted rear yard variances allowing 15 feet rather than 20 feet setback for both lots. As a point of reference,the area of my lot is only 79% of either of Burdick's lots to begin with. The variances issued to Mr. Burdick allowed for utilization of 59 % of the buildable area at 3709, which is a lot of approximately 3105 square feet and 55 % at 3711, which is also a lot of approximately 3105 square feet in area. My amended request(without the zero side yard setback)is to build on 43%of a considerably smaller lot of 2465 square feet in area. Existing utilization of the property including carport and raised deck is 57%. My immediate neighbor to the north,has a rear yard,shoreline setback of 10 feet,and a review of the photographs submitted with the variance application shows that a majority of houses in the area have less than 15 feet setback. I will continue to work with my neighbors and keep them informed of my building plans during the design so that any problems and conflicts can be avoided. Denial of my variance of 15 feet is totally inconsistent with rulings made on the Burdick cases. Why is granting my variance precedent setting,when his was not? Denial of the variance for rear yard setback of 15 feet definitely does not permit me the utilization of land and denies privileges enjoyed by a majority of neighbors. Please accept this as my formal request for reconsideration. If your response is delayed beyond November 5, 1990,please authorize an extension for an appeal submittal to allow me time for preparation. Please advise me with the results of your reconsideration so that I can consider the option for an appeal. Thank you for your time and consideration. spectfully Submitted, Ja W. Deeds 3607 Lk. Wash. Blvd.N. Renton, Wash. Phone 277-0421 (home) 544-0048 (work) R.W. Thorpe & Associates, 1 _.CAVED maikal Planning • Landscape • Environmental • Economic 1990 sNOV 0�p5,,,, �� �g, �g �� iWeiQF :REyG ®'Oiler November 1, 1990 Roza` iGF 1lAI�� Associates: Jay W. Deeds Jeff Buckland 3607 Lake Washington Blvd. North Stephen Speidel, ASLCI Jennifer Tubb Renton, WA 98056 Len Zickler, ASLA RE: Variance Applications- City of Renton - File No. V-055-90 - Jay W. and Elizabeth Deed's Request for Modification and Reconsideration Dear Mr. Deeds: At your request, I have looked at your application, the staff report, photographs, site plan and other information relevant to your three variance applications on your home at 3607 Lake Washington Blvd. North. You asked me to look at this in an j, impartial manner and give you my recommendations. They are as follows: 1. I agree with the examiner's findings to approve on the front yard setback. 2. I agree with the examiner's findings on the side yard setback although there is an existing structure there now. I believe your deletion of this portion of your request is appropriate in the overall plan. 3. I believe that you should ask for reconsideration on the rear yard setback for fifteen feet with the possible addition of conditions for analyzing your buildings envelope as an average between your two neighbors. The following are my findings and an analysis of all of the four required showings under Section 31 of the Renton Code. These are confined only to the rear yard setback recommendation. Initially, let me say based on my own experience of five years of reviewing and recommending on variances as a planning supervisor at the City of Mercer Island and my familiarity with variance procedures at the City of Renton as well as other variances that our staff has done, that your application has substantial merit on the rear yard setback issue. My feeling is that the application had all the various points j and findings that were necessary; however, some clarification and additional bringing out of the significant amount of information that you supplied to the examiner, may assist in his re-evaluation. Further, I believe that the original staff report recommending approval with a change on a handwritten note given to you at the Staff Hearing probably should have resulted in a continuation at that time and given you ample time to respond. I trust the examiner will see the fairness in your request for reconsideration and an opportunity to clarify some points that you did not have any opportunity prior to the Hearing. Seattle: 1 300 Alaska Bldg. • 61 B Second Avenue • Seattle,WA 98104 • (20S)S24-8239 • Fax(20B)625-0930 Seattle • Spokane • Anchorage • Denver Jay W. Deeds 11/02/90 Page 2 of 3 Summary of Revised Request Examiner's Revised Original Recommendation Revision Request Side yard 5-0 Deny 0-0 Withdraw Front yard 5-0 Approve none Concur Rear yard 15-0 Deny 15-0 Reconsider Merits of the Issue As provided for Building Regulation, City of Renton, 4-31-19 F.3. The following findings (all of which are required), appear to be in order. A. Hardship - We believe that this hardship exists because of the special circumstances of the size of the property including shape, topography, and location, and that the adjacent property owners had their houses extended waterside beyond that of the request. Further we believe that the hardship is not of applicant's making. In addition, under the Shorelines Management Act, an averaging of frontage on adjacent properties for bulkheads and structures is allowed. As one looks at the site plan of the two adjacent properties, your 15-0 request effect, would be an averaging between the structures on the north and south (see Site Plan Exhibit). Further, we believe that this hardship and extension to other property owners, was set forth in a precedence of the two Burdick variances. These two variances, along with several others cited by Mr. Deeds in the area, show several precedences, and the allowance of this type of mitigation for site hardship on a majority of the properties in the area. Further, review of the photographs shows that numerous buildings throughout the area not only have houses in the rear yard setback, but that they have decks, guardrails and fences that extend to the waterline. Guardrails and fences are considered structures and should be at the shoreline setback. Thus, the denial of this variance would make Mr. Deed's property truly an anomaly in terms when compared to most of the properties in the area. B . "The granting would not be materially detrimental to the public welfare." We believe this finding can be demonstrated by the fact that the two adjacent property owners have indicated no objection and in fact, have supported the applicant's request. It is my understanding that no other property owners have objected to this. From my own education and experience in M.A.I. classes (real estate appraisal), it would appear that there would not be an adverse economic impact or degradation in values of the adjacent properties, nor would there be any adverse environmental impact on these properties. Seattle: 1300 Alaska Bldg. •2nd&Cherry•Seattle, WA 98104•(206)624-6239 rtikal Anchorage: Suite 503•1110 West Sixth Avenue•Anchorage, AK 99501 •(907)276-0005 Fi.W.Thorpe6 Aeeooetee Jay W. Deeds 11/02/90 I Page 3 of 3 Therefore, we believe this showing can be clearly demonstrated. C. "Approval will not constitute the granting of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations of the properties in the vicinity and zone" - see findings in ' B - see also: photographs and see site plan that shows two adjacent properties already have this rear yard development patterns. D. "That the application is the minimum variance that will accomplish the desired purpose." I have advised Mr. Deeds to discuss this matter with staff and his adjacent property owners to insure that there may not be some minor alteration of the fifteen foot rear yard setback, for design purposes, to create the best design and have a minimal impact. This would likely be minor in nature, a foot or two in terms of this variance, or an averaging between his neighbors in order to accomplish the desired purpose. In summary we feel that Mr. Deeds has prepared an extensive record on his property and that he is asking for a variance to expand his house similar to others. In the Burdick case, a single site was taken, the house was removed and two additional I houses were placed on the property and variances granted for both houses. Here, Mr. Deeds is proposing to utilize his property similar to every other one in the area. His request is only to be able to upgrade an aging house and make it compatible with the surrounding uses both for enjoyment and value. Denial of this request would mean that he would not be able to enjoy the views and the interior space similar to the other property owners. We believe there is precedence for this request and that all impacts can be mitigated so that there are no significant impacts attached to this request. We also feel there is a clear showing on all four points. We trust this gives you some additional insight. We would encourage you to work ' with staff and neighbors to see if there are any modifications or conditions that might be attached to the fifteen foot rear yard setback that may clarify this matter before the Hearing Examiner. Please contact me if you need any additional information. _iv R- . a- 'ully sub• itt-••, .,../4 /7-- A. •ert W. T o • AICP Attachment: Photograph of house from waterside cc: Renton Hearing Examiner Seattle: 1300 Alaska Bldg. •2nd&Cherry•Seattle, WA 98104•(206)624-6239 Anchorage: Suite 503•1110 West Sixth Avenue•Anchorage, AK 99501 •C907]276-0005 R.W.Thorpe&Aesociecee I r 1 . AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )ss. County, of King ) I, • DOTTY KLINGMAN , being first duly sworn,) upon oath, deposes and states: That on the 23rd day of October , 1990 affiant I deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a • 1 decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. LEI ISG0.C.LL SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this 2-3 day of eCO b-er , 1990. J I' N tary P is i and for the State of Washington, residing n2 , therein. Application, Petition, or Case #: V-055-90 - JAY AND ELIZABETH DEEDS (The minutes contain a list of the parties of record.) NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, Renton, Washington, on October 9, 1990 at 9:00 a.m. to consider the following petitions: Heatherrose Preliminary Plat ECF;PP-071-90 Applicant seeks to subdivide a 3.34 acre property, zoned R-1 into 14 parcels for future single-family home development. The platting encompasses four discrete parcels, of which two have been previously subdivided; three single-family residences which now exist on the property (proposed Lots #12, #13, #14) are to be retained. The project is located at N.E. 19th Street at Union Avenue. Deeds Shoreline Exemption and Variances S M E;V-055-90 Applicants seek a Shorelines Master Plan Exemption and a Variance from Section 4.07.02 (D) and Section 7.14.01 (B) of the Renton Shorelands Master Plan and two Variances from Section 4-31-5 (C) (4) of the Renton City Code in order to build a single-family residence adjacent to Lake Washington. They wish to reduce the setback from the lake front from twenty (20) to fifteen (15) feet, the front yard setback from twenty (20) to five (5) feet, and one sideyard setback from five (5) feet to zero. The project is located at 3607 Lake Washington Blvd North. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton. All interested persons to said petitions are invited to be present at the Public Hearing on October 9, 1990 at 9:00 a.m. to express their opinions. Publication Date: September 27, 1990 Account No. 51067 hexpub 9, / 67 '7 v , • RECEIVED OCT 09 1990 f .7-e G V, Eye ,ii f /f/ , (? 7 17 o G14-0 CITY OF RE 3. T HEARING EXAMINER J 6-/L f'�� ceEY S',' ` o i a�i r:e jC C ai 74,v 44. s . . Gc1 e a re.. r%►e • v ume eS c?cc,va`rrs rb tee- Wu A/vo/ moo, a��, clus`,% "0 �e do rl.o`f D � &7L e. of roof C k f` � �r 71‘e, re4r yIrci . • / e Pi 7Yr� gi,d-eeri we . co cc..ioc.l7` S,a/e 4, e-q/ SQ f o o.0 r /, 'y e GJ ,c 4 fl ro o S-e a ., • &J� c/o s4 7` v o S-e _S? S ti•f r ;'S 714e re ar 7- 4 017` r,S4 Sovvi, e c✓ :;. • :c>44 rq "o e /c ie e e. k %oo-d--es > .Z Aioc Q - sJ q/e k 4 s l --/-4ac/k y-- yowy ea_ 711:01-4ifP0 yopir-s S', `Pi r.e r /c/ /• • ins , A i/-e. ;' 5 e • pret-r-e.„:" 7,-c. Oee (Ks, . • ass n t ake_c /0' f-- G q c 01, cOf9ll?-1O/7 / Js Rfku7`4•��P 'u S i •mil Q � At r-e • RECEIVED October 8, 1990 OCT 091990 CITY OF RENTON Hearing Examiner, City of Renton HEARING EXAMINER • Subject: Deeds Shoreline Exemption and Variances,File Number SME; V-055-90 We are the owners and occupants of the property known as 3611 Lake Washington Blvd.N. Renton,Washington. Our property is on the north and immediately adjacent to the Deeds property. Mr.Deeds has reviewed the variance application, and preliminary building plans,which include the zero side yard setback on our common property line,with us. The proposed use of the property would constitute little if any change from the present use of the Deeds property, as their car port wall and fence are now on the property line. We have no objections to the current use or the proposed plans which include the zero side yard setback on the Deeds north property line. We have no objections to the front yard setback of 5 feet, or the rear yard setback of 15 feet either. Sincerely, caner 36D1 Lk. Wash. vd.N. Renton, Wash. OCT 08 '90 09:45 PHOEI CAC • P. * ************** ********** . r**** FA x IRANSMITTAL M ! M Q To: M R , Y _D e GDS NO.OF DEFT: FAX#41.06) 5 %' -'ig3.„,PAGES FROM:, Bled- DS PHONE: (E07-22-41 -g or CO: FAX#, Poaf•lebrand fax transmittal mama 7671 _ OCT 09 1990 WY OF RE TO HEARING EXAMINER October 8, 1990 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: • re : Deeds Shoreline Exemption and Variances SME; V-055-90 This is to advise that I am the owner of the property at 3605 Lake Washington Blvd . North , Renton, WA , said property being located on the south side and directly adjacent to the Deeds ' property at 3607 Lake Washington Blvd . North . On July 7, 1990, Mr . and Mrs. Deeds met with me to discuss their plans and to show me a plot plan of the proposed construction project . Based on our discussions and the plans which Mr . and Mrs . Deeds presented , I have no objections to the granting of the Exemptions and Variances as described in the above referenced petition . Parties having any questions regarding this letter can reach me at C602)269-6608 during business hours, or at C602) 439- 9453 rafter 6 pm. Sincerely , 12) % 4144-404--- Darius F. Richards current residence: 18202 N . 44th Avenue Glendale, AZ 85306 . ' - . - � -- ------------------ -- - .-' - -- - ' - /' i� � ' ' ' - -- `- ----------�------- - �---'- -'-'--- - - - --� - - - --' _ .. � .. | AO r^ '' � ' - -------------�------- ------- ---' �. ���- �'- ' - -- -- Oc - ~` /| o r` - � �- ' � � --- - -'---'--'-�---�-----------'--'- ' ----------------' -�-,----'--- - -'- | � � i � ' - '- ----------� '------ - -' — -- --- '�__ __ || ' '-- ---' - - --' �- --'-'--------'---------- - - � � '-___-_-_--_--_-' , v ` --'-_-______'---- - � |''� - - � - ^ -- '- - '-'--'-- '-- -------- ---'-- ----------- --- -' ---- -------- �| / ! |- ' - - ' �� ' - -' -'- - --- ' ---- '----- --- ----� �--'-------- ---'' ----- - - - -- - | �y �'- ---'_-� �' � ~ - n r . -_- -- ` --� �- ��n�' !-----�-' - '�" /~ ] ~ 44. - I October 23, 1990, OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION APPLICANT: JAY W. AND ELIZABETH A. DEEDS File No: V-055-90 LOCATION: 3607 Lake Washington Blvd. North SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Variances to allow a rear yard setback of 15 ft. rather than; 20 ft. from Lake Washington, and variances from city code' to reduce the front yard from 20 ft. to 5 ft. and side yard from 5 ft. to 0 ft. in order to build a new single-family residence adjacent to Lake Washington. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Planning Division Recommendation: Deny rear yard and side yard setbacks requested. Approve front yard setback request. PLANNING DIVISION REPORT: The Planning Division Report was received by the Examiner on October 2, 1990 PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Division Report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES The hearing was opened on October 9, 1990 at 10:00 A.M. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit #1 - Yellow File containing application, proof of posting and publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit #2 - Vicinity Map Exhibit #3 - Map showing existing homes in the area. II Exhibit #4 - Map showing proposed setbacks. The hearing opened with a presentation of the staff report by MARY SAVELA. Assistant Planner. it Her review comments follow. The applicants wishes to build a new home on this site to replace the current older residence. The it requested reduced setbacks were felt to be necessary to accomplish the completed design. Mr. and Mrs. Deeds wish to reduce the rear yard setback from 20 ft. to 15 ft., the side yard from 5 ft. to 0 ft., and the front yard setback from 20 ft. to 5 ft. There were three letters from adjacent neighbors submitted I,I at the hearing, two from neighbor Mr. John. In his second letter Mr. John expressed opposition to the requested 0 ft. side yard setback along his common property line. Ms. SAVELA noted the property is located in the Kennydale area, is located along Lake Washington Blvd., the lot is very narrow with a building footage of 2,465 sq. ft., with the remainder of the lot under Lake Washington. This request is subject to special provisions of the Shoreline Master Program for Renton. In reviewing criteria for a variance SAVELA addressed the three variance requests separately. The front yard variance is on the easterly side of the property facing the easement road which provides access to the property. It must be determined if the variance is necessary due to special circumstances applicable to the property that would cause undue hardship to the applicant should he wish to develop the property in generally the same manner as other properties in the area. The lot is narrow, ,I irregularly shaped, with the shoreline and a railroad right-of-way making it difficult to develop. Staff feels there are special circumstances that make consideration-of this front yard setback from 20 ft. to 5 j ft. necessary. It is felt the front yard variance will not be detrimental to public welfare as other front Jay W. and Elizabeth A. Deeds V-055-90 October 23, 1990 Page 2 yards in the area have been reduced. This request (front yard setback) would not be considered a special privilege granted to the applicant. The variance for a side yard setback from 5 ft. to 0 ft. was reviewed. SAVELA said staff believes reducing the side yard setback to 0 ft. will not be necessary to build a reasonable home on this site. It is felt the granting of a 0 ft. side yard setback would be injurious to the property to the north due to possible fire hazards and interference with that property's light and air. She said it is felt the 0 ft. variance would be granting a special privilege not enjoyed by other property owners in the area, and is not a pattern the city would want to continue (even though there may be some currently in the area). Staff does not recommend the Examiner approve the 0 ft. side yard request. Regarding the rear yard request from 20 ft. to 15 ft., staff feels the existing house on the site currently respects the 20 ft. setback, and a reduced rear yard from Lake Washington is not necessary to accomplish the building of a newer residence. SAVELA said staff feels, if approved, the shoreline request would be a special privilege to this applicant that is not enjoyed by neighboring sites. Based on information available, Ms. Savela said staff recommends the request for reduced rear and side yard setbacks be denied and approval for the front yard setback from 20 ft. to 5 ft. be granted. The applicant, JAY DEEDS, 3607 Lake Washington Blvd. North, Renton 98056 responded stating he and his wife moved into this seventy-five year old residence approximately 10 years ago. He said they have completed as much remodeling as is practical on such an old house, and now desire to build a new residence on the site. He said the square footage for building is consistent with other sites in the neighborhood; agrees with the recommendation to reduce the front setback to 5 ft.; feels the requested 15 ft. rear yard setback from the shoreline is consistent with what has been approved in the neighborhood in the past (3709 and 3711 Lake Washington North have been approved); he said nearly all the homes in the area have rear yard setbacks of less than 15 ft.; does not agree his requests would create a hardship for surrounding neighbors because the home is a remodeled beach cabin and is not, by today's standards, as large as most homes that are being constructed. He said he feels the hardship is a result of the lot size, dimensions, and location, and requested the 15 ft. setback be approved. Referring to the 0 ft. side yard setback, MR. DEEDS said the request is consistent with present utilization. He said in 1988 a variance was approved permitting the 0 ft. side yard setback for the existing carport and wall along the northern property line. Deeds said there will be no difference in light and air between what is currently on his property and what they are requesting, and prior to rebuilding the carport the old carport was of the same dimension and size and was in place for over thirty years. He referred to two variances approved in 1987 (properties north of his) which have a 0 ft. setback for building carports. It was clarified that this request for 0 ft. side yard setback is for the house, not a carport, and the Examiner questioned how Mr. Deeds would maintain the northern property line without trespassing. Mr. Deeds responded he would have to obtain permission from his neighbors. The Examiner pointed out that the second letter received this date from that neighbor expressed objection to the 0 ft. setback request. DEEDS also said all of the lots in the neighborhood, excepting his, are a minimum of 40 ft. wide. His lot is 36 ft. wide, parking in the area is a premium, , and by allowing additional width on the house and going to a 0 ft. setback it would allow him to put in a two-car garage and keep their vehicles off the street, which he believes is much more aesthetic for the neighborhood and provides more security for him. He requested this 0 ft. lot line setback on the north side be approved. Expressing support for the complete proposal was a neighbor JAMES DENZER, 3613 Lake Washington Blvd. North, Renton 98056. The Examiner pointed out that the shoreline portion of this application will be a recommendation to the State Department of Ecology, who will make the final determination on that portion of this application. The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak, and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 11:15 A.M. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: j Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicants, Jay W. and Elizabeth A. Deeds, filed a request for approval of two variances from the setback provisions of the Zoning Code and for one variance from the provisions of the Shoreline Master Program 2. The yellow file containing the staff report, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. • Jay W. and Elizabeth A. Deeds V-055-90 October 23, 1990 E' Page 3I 3. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the City's responsible official, determined that the proposal is exempt from an environmental assessment. ti 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. 5. The subject site is located at 3607 Lake Washington Boulevard North. The site is located on the shore of Lake Washington approximately 600 feet north of Kennydale Beach Park. 6. The subject site was initially annexed to the city with the adoption of Ordinance 1791 enacted in September, 1959, as amended by Ordinances 1800 and 1804 enacted in October and December 1959, respectively. 7. The site is zoned R-1 (Single Family; Lot size - 7,200 sq ft). 8. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of single family uses, but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the Plan. 9. The parcel is shaped like a parallelogram. The north and south property lines run almost rl directly east to west. The west and east property lines angle from the southwest to the northeast - constrained by the shoreline on the west and the road and railroad right-of-way on the east. 10. Being a shoreline lot the majority of the lot is submerged below the waters of Lake Washington. The upland or buildable portion of the lot is approximately 2,465 square feet in area. This small lot area does support an existing single family home located on the subject site. 11. The Shoreline Master Program requires a 20 foot setback from the shores of Lake Washington. The existing home sits back the required 20 feet, thereby observing the required setback. A deck attached to the home observes a setback that varies from 6 feet to more than 13 feet. 12. The Zoning Code requires a 20 foot front yard and a 5 foot minimum side yard. The existing house is constructed along the normal east/west-north/south axis and, therefore, sits off-angle on the lot. This configuration creates uneven setbacks. The front yard setback varies from approximately 5 feet to approximately 14.5 feet. The side yards vary from approximately 2.5 feet to approximately a half foot, where a bay-type projection extends from the house on the south side, to approximately 10 feet excluding the attached carport. The variance approved by the Board of Public Works permitted a carport with a zero (0) setback on the north side. While the carport does observe a zero (0) foot setback it is angled low, and its height near the property line probably does not exceed 7 to 8 feet. 13. The applicant proposes erecting a new house on the site that would reflect the parallelogram 'I shape of the parcel. The lines of the new home would more or less be parallel to the property lines, although there would be some articulations that would create a stepped setback. The proposed second floor would overhang the first floor along the front yard and be stepped in along the north sideyard. 14. The neighbor to the north, the owner of the property adjacent to the proposed zero setback, objected to the setback if it would affect the property and if a setback is required. This reversed an earlier endorsement of the proposal prepared by the applicant. 15. An easement roadway approximately 15 feet wide serves the subject site and other homes along the waterfront in this area. The setbacks vary ranging from almost a zero setback for some ;j garages to approximately 4 to 5 feet of setback. A number of homes have setbacks of 2 to 3 feet. tit 16. The applicant referenced the Burdick variances. The Shoreline variances produced mixed, although limited relief. One variance was denied. The one that was approved was for a lot that; was only 45 feet deep, whereas the applicant's lot is between 60 and 64 feet deep. The variances to reduce front yard setback were approved. CONCLUSIONS 1. The nature of the variances requires separate considerations of each one individually. Two of ;I the variances are from provisions of the Zoning Code, while the third variance is from provisions of the Shoreline Master Program. While similar, the criteria for review for Zoning Code variances is different than the criteria used to review variances from the Shoreline Master Program. • • Jay W. and Elizabeth A: Deeds til it V-055-90 October 23, 1990 Page 4 2. The following criteria are applicable to both the variance from front yard setback requirements 11 and the variance from side yard setback requirements. Variances may be granted when the property satisfies all the conditions described in part below: ;j a. The applicant suffers undue hardship caused by special circumstances such as: the size, li shape, topography, or location where code enforcement would deprive the owner of rights and privileges enjoyed by others similarly situated; b. The granting of the variance would not materially harm either the public welfare or �! other property in the vicinity; c. The approval will not constitute a special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on 1 other property in the vicinity; and d. The variance is the minimum variance necessary to allow reasonable development of the subject site. Front Yard Variance ill 3. The applicant's property appears ripe for the variance requested. The limited upland area of this Lake Washington lot, coupled with the variance relief afforded other property owners along the narrow access road, demonstrates that the front yard variance should be granted. The lot's limited size (uplands) of approximately 2,465 feet, and its irregular parallelogram shape, would deprive the owner of rights granted to others along this street. 4. Granting a variance to reduce the front yard to five feet is reasonable given the nature of the 1 development along this stretch of Lake Washington Boulevard. One can approach the subject site in two ways. The lot was platted in an arbitrarily small fashion, and as such, the hardship pi was self-created by the applicant or his predecessor in interest, and deserves little consideration. On the other hand, it seems equitable to ignore to some extent the self-created hardship and grant the variance to permit the applicant to utilize the site in a fashion similar to the use enjoyed by others in the immediate vicinity. The site is undersized and is not shaped like the i ordinary rectangular lots elsewhere in the city. 5. The approval should not materially affect adjacent properties since they are similarly aligned along the frontage. Setbacks vary from almost zero to closer to standard, but many approach the five foot setback requested by the applicant. The clearance provided elsewhere along the easement already permits the maneuvering of emergency vehicles. The requested variance would not additionally hamper passage. 6. Since other properties along the frontage have similar setbacks, the approval of the variance will it not grant the applicant a special privilege inconsistent with rights conferred elsewhere under similar circumstances. 1 7. Reviewing this variance is not done in a vacuum. The proposed front yard variance is balanced against the other requested variances, the side yard and rear yard/shoreline variances to allow a reasonable redevelopment. In that balance, the front yard setback appears reasonable. As explained below, the other variances are not justified in this balancing scheme. Side Yard Variance 8. This variance must be denied. While it obviously meets some of the criteria demonstrated for the front yard variance (the lot is still obviously small and irregularly shaped) it fails in two important respects. It infringes on the rights and property interests of the adjacent homeowner. It also is not beneficial to the public welfare in maintaining reasonable setbacks and distances j between property for light and air. 9. First, the neighboring property owner has objected. But even if the objection had not been !, registered, the public welfare is not preserved by imposing zero setbacks between existing properties. It is not as if these adjacent properties had been initially designed with a zero setback where design skills could have been employed to counter the loss of light and air. The zero setback is being imposed on an existing house which was not designed to be nestled so close to its neighbor. The proposed sidewall will be approximately 35 to 40 feet long and at least one story high. This is not a carport. 10. Its obvious that with a zero setback the only way the applicant would be able to maintain the exterior wall would be to intrude on the northerly lot's privacy. While it may be infrequent, there is no justification to allow such an intrusion. It is also the neighboring property which will be left to stare at this wall. III Jay W. and Elizabeth A—. V-055-90 October 23, 1990 Page 5 11. The prior variance was granted by the Board of Adjustment for a carport. The Board was dealing with existing construction, and existing constraints may have dictated the results. This office will not second guess the Board of Adjustment since preexisting development may have precluded locating off-street parking in any other fashion. That is not the case any longer. There are no preexisting conditions on locating the parking. This will be new construction. When that variance was granted the existing development may have justified a zero setback, but' with a new design there can be absolutely no justification for intruding on the neighboring property as now proposed. 12. The applicant indicated that a reasonable home could be constructed on the lot, but that it might have to be three stories. Since variance relief is only available when reasonable alternatives don't exist, the exceptional relief sought must be denied. Shoreline Variance for a Rear Yard I' 13. The criteria for a Shoreline Variance generally parallel those for ordinary variances, and the same conclusions are applicable to the uniqueness of the size and shape of the parcel. The conclusions must diverge in the area of material hardship. Again, while there is no question that the lot is small and irregularly shaped, a variance from the Shoreline Master Program is not justified. The existing house, exclusive of the deck, observes the required setback. The approval of the front yard variance already provides more than enough relief to allow reasonable development on the subject site. Finally, the request if approved, would create an inappropriate precedent where similar requests have been either denied or strictly limited. 14. As stated in the previous conclusion, a balancing of the front yard variance against encroachment along the shoreline yields approval of the front yard request, but does not necessitate a precedent setting shoreline variance. The constraints on this lot were, or should have been evident when it was purchased. It is inappropriate to squeeze too large a home on j such an undersized lot. While it is reasonable on occasion to waive some setback requirements (in this case the front yard setback) waiving others creates a poor precedent permitting overdevelopment or inappropriate development. That is one reason the side yard variance is inappropriate, and similar logic guides review of the variance sought from the Shoreline Master Program. 15. There is no pressing need to extend any precedent as the city attempts to enforce its shoreline regulations. If the setback standards are to mean anything they must be observed and not waived unless there is a compelling reason to do so. As staff noted, there is no compelling reason. Reasonable development can occur on this site without variance relief. It's just that the , applicant has chosen a design that requires a variance, not that other methods would not permit reasonable development. Since a reasonable home can be constructed with the frontage variance approved without further encroaching on the shoreline and the neighboring property, this variance is unnecessary. 16. Finally, since similar requests have been denied it would be inappropriate to grant this request. DECISION 1. The Front Yard Variance is approved. The home may have a front yard of not less than five (5) feet. 2. The Side Yard Variance is denied. 2. The Shoreline Variance is denied. ORDERED THIS 23rd day of October, 1990. • III`_ FRED J. KA AN HEARING E MINER TRANSMITTED THIS 23rd day of October, 1990 to the parties of record: II Jay and Elizabeth Deeds 3607 Lake Washington Blvd. No. Renton, WA 98056 • Jay W. and Elizabeth h. Deeds V-055-90 October 23, 1990 Page 6 James Denzer 3613 Lake Washington Blvd. No. Renton, WA 98056 TRANSMITTED THIS 23rd day of October, 1990 to the following: Mayor Earl Clymer Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator Lynn A. Guttmann, Administrator Members, Renton Planning Commission Jim Hanson, Development Services Manager Glen Gordon, Fire Marshal Ronald Nelson, Building Director Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Jay Covington, Mayor's Executive Assistant Transportation Systems Division Valley Daily News Utilities System Division Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 15 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 P.M. November 6, 1990. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 16, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of$75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. ' - ~ ' w � � 1 107 104. 83 24 95 -77 75 Igo Jay -and Elizabeth Deeds 3ME^,V-055-90 | . - APPLICANT Jay & Elizabeth Deeds TOTAL AREAOpprOX, 2,465 S.f. |� / PRINCIPAL ACCESS Lake Washington Blvd North / EXISTING ZONING R-1 , 3inqle-Family Residential 1 EXISTING USE Single-Family Resigen i |� -- � PROPOSED USE Single-Family Residence | COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN | Single-Family Residence ' COMMENTS Located at 3607 Lake Washington Blvd North . '� ^ | ^ Jay W. Deeds f . 3607 Lake Washington Blvd. North Renton, WA 98056 ATTACHMENT 1. LOT DETAILS AND EXISTING CONSTRUCTION 6' FENCE • COVERED CARPORT I , -- 0 FIRST FLOOR LINE 2 --- - - — tL ROAD EASEMENT - Q' �I = W z Z .5ca DECK o O o u_ I / 2 0 . Z o N EXISTING HOUSE N i \.\\ \ FENCE dO, API 1 INCH = 10 FEET N , c-7. O T.' C.. . , Jay W. Deeds . - 3607 Lake Washington Blvd. North Renton, WA 98056 ATTACHMENT 2. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION I FIRST FLOOR UNE ? 0 2ND FLOOR LINE I i-. —74/ , CD I 2 a , 2 a . tf I .9 ROAD EASEMENT . __•T - ic . 5 - -- - GARAGE-- 4:20- 35/ licl ------- 2 :9..__________ -2 01 . -5 1: I . • 0 7 2 o • (..) PROPOSED HOUSE I / / 7i)F / • in ..• , , , 6 0• ' . N • 1 INCH = 10 FEET I • <; C:•:: x;•::::::; ;•x::;:+w:;•::NT::1\1:iE;i» : :iNiii ' . 'i i ii::: :.. ::•CURRENT :P.LaNN;ING.<;: IV:I TON�� • >•':>::: ::;: i ::::<::::::>:<::::;::�::;:::r:;:z>`::.;:>: . : : :`A�FI-.D.AvIT.:b� ::SV- .C:�:ii3:Y:::.MAI:L1Ni*:.:-.:::ii .i:: . i ;:>: >:::: ::::: :. ; :On the • 3. day of de-1a6DeY • , 19 10 , I • deposited in the mails of the United Sta es a sealed envelope containing 4.E . {ee1 e);:t �'• documents . This information was .sent to: Name Representing ieu.i. 4. EkaloezOr\ i.)ce.cis • • • • 4; • • (Signature of Sender) �ayq C. Sub cribed as dl'E°�c.0 to me this 5 day of • 19 0 �so,p.RETJ A••,� •° NOTARY 17 Note y •Publ ' c in and for the Poi : : State of Washington residing . . -7h% / 9t":es �,#0 00%....9,°C,'C 4 therein. 4aOoeRASH\ ee°' > :P:ro>::'e.c .:::. : .... .. : :> ..::::.:..:.:::; 4::.:......•. :. :.: :'.ift . :::: :..ismin :::::::::::: t Name ...::. : ... �� �.• • ::. ......O*. .. .. : N.umb:e r::: ::? < •.`:::' . :V .;.. :::.:. ::;.:: .::.:::.a::-..:::::: :;::::::>:;<:2:;;::;::::;:': :>.`•:C<;::>:::::> :;;:::2:; I . ! 1 CITY HEA RING.RIN G XA R .� PUBLIC HEARI :.:::.<...::.«.::...:.:.:....«...: AGENDA ;:<.C.OMMENCIN ..... ...... ... ........ ...:..:::::::.: CHAMBERS. $ECOND'.FLOOq; FtENTONMUNICIPAL.p he:applicatlon(s) listed..are:in.order of application number:onlyand not:necessaril••�>th``r e`in ... .. .... . ..:::::.:.:.:.:.:..:. .:.., ::. :. .. .......:.. ... ...,. ..:>. :.:..:.y.: .:...: .:.:::.. .:..:;:::;:::..::.;)!>:..::e::or.de�;tn.which;:.: :t eY!^!! : e: �ard;::::Items:will.:kiecalled for:hearin• at t e di r . ........ . . .... . ...::.; ::.:....:..:.::..::.::::::':::>::>:::>:<>::>:::::::>:::: : : . . .. .; .:::..::...:.9..:..... h...:.::.scetionofaheHeai� Ex� iner,<.;:>:::;;:.:.:.::::.:::;;.:.:: ................. PROJECT NAME: Heatherrose Preliminary Plat �• PROJECT NUMBERS: ECF;PP-071-90 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Applicant seeks to subdivide a 3.34 acre property, zoned R-1 Into 1•4 parcels for future single-family home development. The platting encompasses four discrete parcels, of which two have been previously subdivided; three single-family residences which now exist on the property(proposed Lots#1,2, #13, #14) are to be retained. • l PROJECT NAME: Deeds Variances, Shoreline Variance and Shoreline Exemption PROJECT NUMBERS: SME;V-055-90 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: . Applicants seek a Shorelines Master Plan Exemption and a Variance from Section 4.07.02 (D) and Section 7.14.01 (B) of the Renton Shorelands Master Plan and two Variances from Section 4-31-5 (C) (4) of the Renton City Code In order to build a single-family residence adjacent to Lake Washington. They wish to reduce the setback from the lake front from twenty (20)to fifteen (15) feet,the front yard setback from twenty (20) to five (5) feet, and one sideyard setback from five (5) feet to zero. I • • 1 - hi ri ,I DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER - I PUBLIC HEARING APPLICANT: Jay W. and Elizabeth A. Deeds FILE NUMBER: SME;V-055-90 LOCATION: 3607 Lake Washington Blvd. North A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: Applicants seek a Shoreline Master Plan exemption and a variance from Section 4.07.02(D) and Section 7.14.01(B) of the Renton Shoreline Master Program to allow a 15 foot rather than the !. prescribed 20 foot setback from Lake Washington and two variances from Section 4-31-5(C)(4)(a and c) of the Renton City Code to reduce the required R-1 front yard from 20 feet to 5 feet and the ri required side yard from 5 feet to 0 feet in order to build a single-family residence adjacent to Lake Washington. They wish to reduce the setback from the lake front from twenty (20) to fifteen (15) feet,the front yard setback from twenty (20) to five (5) feet, and one side yard setback from five (5) to zero (0)feet. B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record: Jay W. and Elizabeth A. Deeds 2. Applicant: Jay W.and Elizabeth A. Deeds it 3. Existing Zoning: R-1, Single-Family Residential 4. Existing Zoning in the Area: R-1, Single-Family Residential. 5. Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Single-Family Residential ' I 6. Size of Property: Approximately 2,465 square feet of buildable area. The remainder of the property is under water. li 7. Access: Lake Washington Blvd. North 8. Land Use: The property currently Is developed with a single-family residence. 9. Neighborhood Characteristics: North: Single-Family Residences I, East: Single-Family Residences South: Single-Family Residences West: Lake Washington C. HISTORICAL/BACKGROUND: Action File Ordinance Date Initial annexation --- 1791 9-8-59 II Amended --- 1800 10-13-59 Amended --- 1804 12-8-59 Rezone (G-6000 to R-1) --- 3634 6-13-82 prelmrpt • G PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER Deeds Variances, Shoreline Variance and Shoreline Exemption PUBLIC HEARING October 2, 1990 Page 2 D. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1. Utilities a. Water: An eight inch water main runs along Lake Washington Blvd. North. b. Sewer: A force main is available In Lake Washington to serve this.site. c. Storm Water Drainage: Storm water flows into Lake Washington. L 2. Fire Protection: Provided by the City of Renton as per ordinance requirements. 3. Transit: The subject site is not served by Metro transit. 4. Schools: N/A 5. Recreation: Kennydale Beach Park Is approximately 600 feet south of the subject property and Gene Coulon Park is within one-half mile to the south of the subject site. E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1. Section 4-31-5, R-1 Residential Zone. 2. Section 4-31-19(F),Variance. -- k F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT: 1. Residential Goal, City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium, 1986 (pgs. 14-16). 2. Section 4.07.02(D), Residential Element, City of Renton Shoreline Master Program, 1985. ! . 3. Section 7.14.01(B), Residential Development, City of Renton Shoreline Master Program, 1985. ' .4. Section 8.02,Variance, City of Renton Shoreline Master Program, 1985. 5. Section 4-8-10(A)(5), Duties of the Examiner, City of Renton Code. G. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1. The applicants, Jay and Elizabeth Deeds, are seeking approval of three variances to allow the I development of a single-family residence on Lake Washington. The applicants are asking for two variances from the Zoning Code setback regulations for a single-family house in an R-1 zone, one to reduce the front yard setback from twenty (20) feet to five (5) feet and one to reduce one side I yard setback from five (5) to zero (0) feet. In addition, they are requesting a variance from the I Shoreline Master Program to allow a fifteen.(15) foot setback from Lake Washington instead of the , twenty(20)foot setback required by the Shoreline Master Program. + I The variances are being sought because the buildable area of the lot is approximately 2,465 square feet.. The remainder of the property is under water in Lake Washington. 2. The application for a variance is exempt from environmental review under the State Environmental Protection Act (WAC 197-11-800(a)). 3. Staff from various City departments and sections have reviewed and commented on the applicants' requests. These comments are incorporated into this report. prelmrpt • PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER Deeds Variances, Shoreline Variance and Shoreline Exemption it PUBLIC HEARING October 2, 1990 Page 3 FRONT YARD VARIANCE 4. In considering a variance, the Hearing Examiner is asked to consider the following conditions and find that they exist: • a. That the applicant suffers undue hardship and the variance is necessary because of special circumstances applicable to subject property, Including size, shape, topography, location, or surroundings of the subject property, and the strict application of the Zoning Code is found to deprive subject property owner of rights and privileges enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity and under identical zone classification. The buildable area of the applicants' lot is ap proximately pproximately 2,465 square feet in size with the remainder of the lot being under water. The lot Is long and narrow and the buildable area is almost a parallelogram in shape. Although the buildable area is constrained by the location of an easement roadway and a railroad right-of-way along the eastern property fI line, the site accommodates an existing single-family house that does respect the twenty I' (20) foot setback from Lake Washington established in the Shoreline Master Program. The size and shape of this lot constitute special circumstances that make a variance necessary however for both side yard and front yards under the City's Zoning Code. b. That the granting of the front yard variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which subject property is situated. The granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or Injurious to the it property or improvements in the vicinity. Front yard setbacks in the area vary from almost zero to the required twenty feet. Several homes in the area have setbacks of from two to ten feet. Currently, emergency vehicles are able to maneuver along Lake Washington Blvd. North even though several properties In the vicinity have reduced front yard setbacks. c. The approval shall not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitation upon uses of other properties In the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is situated. The approval of a reduced front yard variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege which is inconsistent with the manner in which nearby properties have been developed. As noted above, several homes in the vicinity have similar front yard setbacks. The applicants submitted photographs showing other properties with comparable front yard 'l setbacks. d. That the approval, as determined by the Hearing Examiner, is a minimum variance that will accomplish the desired purpose. . The approval of this front yard variance would appear to be the minimum that will accomplish the desired purpose, particularly if the Shoreline Master Program setback from the lake is respected. SIDE YARD VARIANCE 5. As noted in (4) above, in considering a variance,the Hearing Examiner is asked to consider the following conditions and find that they exist: a. That the applicant suffers undue hardship and the variance is necessary because of special circumstances applicable to subject property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings of the subject property, and the strict application of the Zoning Code is found to deprive subject property owner of the rights and privileges enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity and under identical zone classification: As noted above,the subject lot is small, narrow, and of an irregular shape, however, these conditions will be substantially relieved by the recommended granting of reduced front yard setback. The present house located on the subject property received a variance (V- 538-88) in 1988 to allow a zero side yard on the north side of the property, but the applicants' intention is to remove the existing house and construct a new house. The 1988 variance does not go with the land; it expires when the existing house is demolished. prelmrpt PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER 41 Deeds Variances, Shoreline Variance and Shoreline Exemption ,4 PUBLIC HEARING October 2, 1990 Page 4 A zero side yard setback would not be in the best Interests of neighboring property owners, especially those immediately north of the subject property. It would limit light and I1 air to the neighboring property and create a serious fire hazard. G' b. That the granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which subject property is situated: The granting of this side yard variance would be materially detrimental to the public welfare (fire hazard) and injurious to the property in the vicinity, especially the adjoining property to the north (fire hazard,deprivation of light and air). c. That approval shall not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitation upon uses of other properties in the vicinity and zone In which the subject property is situated: .1 Approval of this side yard variance would be a grant of special privilegernot commonly enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity. Many of the lots in the area are'narrow and the houses are close together, but zero side yards are unusual. The fact that zero side yards occasionally were allowed in the past Is not a reason to allow new construction to follow this pattern. Most homes in the vicinity were built under King County standards before the area was annexed into the City of Renton. As these older homes are replaced, City of Renton regulations should be followed whenever reasonable. d. That the approval as determined by the Hearing Examineris a minimum variance that will accomplish the desired purpose: .1 Approval of the zero side yard variance is not necessary to allow construction of a new house on the subject property. The recommended approval of the variance for the front yard setback would, in staff's opinion, provide the applicants with a reasonable building area without the detrimental effects on neighboring properties that the zero side yard setback would cause. SHORELINES VARIANCE 6. The applicants also seek approval of a variance from the required 20 foot setback from Lake Washington in the City Shoreline Master Program. The State of Washington, in the legislation for Shorelines Management (RCW 90.58) establishes the criteria with which to review variance applications which affect state shorelines. The City of Renton Shoreline Master Program, in Section Eight, reflects the criteria established by the State. These criteria are as follows: a. That the strict application of the bulk, dimensional or performance standards set Ili forth in the applicable master program precludes or significantly interferes with a reasonable use of the property not otherwise prohibited by the master program: The City of Renton's Shoreline Master Program requires that all residential structures be set back a minimum of twenty (20)feet from the shoreline. The existing house on the site currently respects this setback. In this case, with the granting of the front yard setback to five (5) feet, staff do not believe that the strict enforcement of the setback requirement would interfere with the reasonable use of the property. Therefore, staff do not support this setback if the front yard setback Is granted. • b. That the hardship described in WAC 173-14-150 (2) (a)above is specifically related to the property, and is the result of unique conditions such as irregular lot shape, size, or natural features and the application of the master program, and not, for example, from deed restrictions or the applicant's own actions: Since an existing house on the site does meet the prescribed shoreline setback, it would appear that hardship, in this case, is a result of the applicant's own actions. c. That the design of the project is compatible with other permitted activities in the area I and will not cause adverse effects to adjacent properties or the shoreline environment: Ij Although some properties in the area have reduced rear yard setbacks, by no means do all lots. prelmrpt PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER Deeds Variances, Shoreline Variance and Shoreline Exemption PUBLIC HEARING October 2, 1990 Page 5 d. That the requested variance does not constitute a grant of special privilege not enjoyed by the other properties in the area and is the minimum necessary to afford relief: See c. response above. e. That the public interest will suffer no substantial detrimental effect: The granting of the rear yard setback, although it does not appear to be highly detrimental to the public interest, establishes further precedent for similar actions on other lots. Thus, the individual/combined impacts of such actions would not be In the public interest. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION: Based upon the above analysis, Staff recommend that the Hearing Examiner deny the variances to reduce the rear yard setback to fifteen (15) feet and the side yard setback to zero(0)feet. Staff recommend that the Hearing Examiner grant the variance to allow a front yard setback of five (5) feet. prelmrpt c� CITY ^)F RENTON Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ' Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann, Administrator September 25, 1990 Jay W. & Elizabeth A. Deeds 3607 Lake Washington Blvd N Renton, WA 98056 SUBJECT: Deeds Shoreline Exemption and Variances SME;V-055-90 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Deeds: The date of Tuesday, October 9, 1990, at 9:00 a.m., has been set for review of exemption request and variances for the above-referenced matter. The hearing will be held in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, Renton, Washington. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you before the hearing. If you have any questions, please call 235-2550. Sincerely, Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator • • 11 hexltr/DKE/kac inn k/17i1 Aven„e South - RPntnn Washington 9R0.55 - (2061 235-2631 '' IN-1 •_ 'C —v 1 _ :.� �Ivti , vim. . �54.9s 7,T,:.;:-1 ,5i77.:'0; 51067 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Kathleen Hoover ,being first duly sworn on oath states NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A Public Hearing will be held by the Ren- VALLEY DAILY NEWS ton Hearing Examiner at his regular meet- ing in the Council Chambers on the second • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition floor of City Hall, Renton, Washington, on October 9, 1990 at 9:00 a.m. to consider the following petitions: Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week. That said newspapers Heatherrose Preliminary Plat ECF;PP- 071-90are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six monthsprior to the date ofpublication referred to, Applicantt , zoned seeks R-1 subdivide4 a parcels3.34 acre for printed and published property, into 14 for in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King future single-family home development.The Count Washington. The ValleyDailyNews has been approved as a legal platting encompasses four discrete parcels, y g pP of which two have been previously subdivid- newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for ed; three single-family residences which King County. now exist on the property (proposed Lots #12, #12, #14)are to be retained. The pro- ct is l The notice in the exact forrr1X itached, was published inxt ie Kent Edition Avenueocated at N.E. 19th Street at Union Renton Edition , Auburn Edition , (and not in Deeds Shoreline exemption and Varianc- es SME;V-055-90 supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers Applicants seek a Shorelines Master Plan during the below stated period. The annexed notice a p,1 h i i r Nn 1-i r-a Exemption and a Variance from Section 4.07.02 (D) and Section 7.14.01 (B) of the (Notice of Public Hearing) 4693 Renton Shorelands Master Plan and two variances from Section 4,31-5(C)(4)of the Renton City Code in order to build a single- was published on Sept . 2 7, 19 9 0 family residence adjacent to Lake Washing- was ton. They wish to reduce the setback from the lake front from twenty(20)to fifteen(15) feet,the front yard setback from twenty(20) The full am u tthe fee char to five (5) feet, and one sideyard setback 4n,y Q f 5 ged for said fore din g g Publication is the from five (5) feet to zero. The project is sum of$ located at 3607 Lake Washington Blvd. North. Legal descriptions of the files noted XaLitb—(//,()/(49-1! above are on file in the Development Ser- vices Division, Third Floor, Municipal Build- ing, Renton. All interested persons to said petitions are invited to be present at the Public Hear- ing on October 9, 1990 at 9:00 a.m, to Subscribed and sworn before me this 2 n d day of Oct . 19 90 express their opinions. Published in the Valley Daily News Sep- tember 27, 1990. 4693 \.._.-/ Lgt/---10',4e--k-Z �-E Notary Public for the State of Washingtonc.)-- residing at Atikwa,43,.44,t King County, Washington VDN#87 Revised 4/89 I I NOTICE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON,WASHINGTON • A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, Renton, Washington, on October 9, 1990 at 9:00 a.m. to consider the following petitions: Deeds Shoreline Exemption and Variances SME;V-055-90 Applicants seek a Shorelines Master Plan Exemption and a Variance from Section 4.07.02 (D) and Section 7.14.01 (B) of the Renton Shorelands Master Plan and two Variances from Section 4-31-5 (C) (4) of the Renton City Code in order to build a single-family residence adjacent to Lake Washington. They wish to reduce the setback from the lake front from twenty (20) to fifteen (15) feet, the front yard setback from twenty (20) to five (5) feet, and one sideyard setback from five (5) feet to zero. The project is located at 3607 Lake Washington Blvd North. ' Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton. 1 All interested persons to said petitions are invited to be present at the Public Hearing on October 9, 1990 at 9:00 a.m.to express their opinions. Publication Date: September 27, 1990 ;I — I --- - - -- - - _ 43. &/ 01: "- - - - - - - / •� _ - - - ® . - _ �7 G ,ao r - - O 2 _ _ _ _ __ __ if 7 0 ill I I I W le s/A j N 2• sue. - - - - - - -- - alliir' / So it \411114114" $ - - - — - 61 ' '/ / m -{\" �� A — — — _ —__ ®- 3S z4 e C I°-laolf ' / l w Vly�eot�..;s3a-a`-.S I . 0". APR ,7 t l . ' hexpub OF RED m T ' U 2 © OZ Lip 1 Z O,99TfD SEp-coi'P City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner - will hold a puBtleHEARING , I I I in 1 CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL OCTOBER 9, 1990 9:00 P.M. ON BEGINNING AT A.M. CONCERNING: DEEDS SHORELINE EXEMPTION AND VARIANCES SME;V-055-90 • APPLICANTS SEEK A SHORELINES MASTER PLAN EXEMPTION AND A VARIANCE FROM SECTION 4.07.02 (D) AND SECTION 7.14.01 (B) OF THE RENTQN SHORELANDS MASTER PLAN AND TWO VARIANCES FROM SECTION 4-31-5 (C) (4) OF THE RENTON CITY CODE IN, ORDER TO BUILD A SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE ADJACENT TO LAKE WASHINGTON. THEY WISH TO REDUCE THE SETBACK FROM THE LAKE FRONT FROM "TWENTY (20) TO FIFTEEN (15) FEET, THE FRONT YARD SETBACK FROM TWFITE (20) TO FIVE (5) FEET, AND ONE SIDEYARD SETBACK (5) FEET.TO ZERO. - ---- ---- / Q 7-- -TT- - T-- w/ z I ® tI Yj c �/ / 2 1 r •-•- o a ------ -- _�//ys•�/ _so Si 3 — _ _ /�\ knlibMr-,4-6..‘riiiimt,-/ 4 e..- I sad / _ GENERAL L 4 CATION • n) • - , CRESS: 3607 LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD NORTH FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION • 235-2550 'THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT P" PROPER AUTHORIZATION CERTIFICATION I tk , ' HEREBY CERTIFY THAT lit,0eG COPIES HE ABOVE D CUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN ��iw� CON CUPCOPIESUS OF SPICUO LACES ON ' OR NEARBY THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY ON f. �� /r a 1 ,loss eueeia°°. beer IGARET °s, ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to be,�re rnep�lSS/p� '.O tee® I c� G e Notary Public, in and for the Stat�►of 4fiasliir% n .o:< residing i'n : ���, 7-°S, o day of ' ' //� .D `e U . � +'off, I G N E D • ©7121e6 eneoo515 • OF R4, L ;I' t$ © :-; 0 ._ __ iii, 0,9A 099T6D SEPZEOP . ii I City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner will hold a NEARING pooLic in CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL. 1 OCTOBER 9, 1990. 9:00 it ON BEGINNING AT _ A.M. P,LM. CONCERNING: DEEDS SHORELINE EXEMPTION AND VARIANCES. SME;V-055-90 APPLICANTS SEEK A SHORELINES MASTER PLAN EXEMPTION 1 AND A VARIANCE FROM SECTION 4.07.02 (D) AND SECTION 7.14.01 (B) OF THE RENTON SHORELANDS MASTER PLAN AND TWO VARIANCES .FROM SECTION 4-31-5 (C) 4 OF THE RENTON CITY CODE IN ORDER TO BUILD A SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE ;I ADJACENT TO LAKE WASHINGTON. THEY WISH TO REDUCE THE SETBACK FROM THE LAKE FRONT FROM TWENTY (20) TO t FIFTEEN (15) FEET, THE FRONT YARD SETBACK FROM TWENTY !' (20) TO FIVE (5) FEET, AND ONE SIDEYARD SETBACK FROM FIVE (5) FEET TO ZERO. .._ -- - - - - •ifi / Rc III . ?- -1 - - - -® / o ii - _ .41 / -1., _ ri co. - J_ -- - -I - .- - - - 46 . / ')• ;' I t e — _ _ _ ___ corr///t e/,': /► �'�-v 7 k o c ---- — --___ Mr . V , 2? "'? GENERAL L CATION = • - .; �-RESS: . / I / _T . �,n :.. . . 36.07 LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD NORTH ' FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL. THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION 235-2550 THIpsxpsNOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION •a • ENT : '> . <:< > �C�� :�111i`IVI:;':::IV:t::::..; :D:::>:,;�::::::::::< ::;>:;>::»::>:::D:;»��������.��"f`IVIE . ..::.::::::::::::.: .:. .:.:..;. O U TY". .�. .EL P.NCENT.. E .AR { :`:TEC PIN .:.:E1=::��::': ::::`i::::::::':>:::::::::::::`:::>:::::::<:::::: CH CAL.AD�VISORY�C•OIIV(NIITT :::::: 7.t:AfF:..REPO.R::: ��: > > > > . S A .. ..REP.ORT . :: 6i.::: 't 1• 0 : ` >:: ::: ::: : :: : :<: : :......: ::::::::: ::: :::>:,f,5:::: : .Ju .j.3 .. 990...... . , ::::AP:PLI•��A`1' : �?:� � � ; >:�� > � > W: iz �:'�tSA. eds C...N........... Jay.......and.:.::..abe.......... .e ...............:..:::::::::::::.:::::::: ::::::.::: •::•.:':f���•ri'����nd. r a ce: �>P:R� J;E::'TAD::::::::::; h<:r::�;:n::::�'x�:`m o a a ::>:::::ENUIaONM•ENTALC4CK IST.................SMEU-055=90:l:::>$i:i::> i: m: :::Ii:< ::>: ii: ::: :: ��> : :<:<1:::: :: .DE.. .::::R:::::•<::::<'';:>:;<:`�::;;::::::::::::.::':.>:;:•::'::=:: :� :< ; < >�: :>.::: :::>:>:::::>::<::k_:::�:' �:<:::rlin ::N[a e a SC fP7lON OP' PROPOSAL .•Applicants see a S o e...,es... ....... ...........,,•,.:.. p:•:...:.; ;, : h :r.ln ........ ........ .... ::>::::::>::::>:::::: :: nci:::a::::Uariane.e'>.from: S.ecti rr:::4�0Z02 D:::: nd.S.e�•fiorr�:��71401::. t3 ..of?the.:�Rntan.:.S..o e.a..ds..; : .#:.;...:.;t:..,...:::;:'it >Go fe.i ode :> �:: ::::: ::<Mas.er...Pla...and:two.1/.anances:fromSetion;4:=31:=5. .� .. .. ..o.... .e ... .....o..... ...y... . ..:..:.. ..:.:::: o-: t.:ack: � ���::tfi•�.se bac ::<: : : � �::::::biilci'a::sing e.:famll ::residence.ad acentto.:Lake Wasfiin .o...........e.Y...... ..:: .::::::.:::: �::::...:::.:.:::.. : .:-: ::: ::::::::>:::: :fr..om..<the>lake::front>'from::twenty 20:::t ::fifteen::.:1.5: eet�::the:�fr.f.ifi�ardgsetback:fromtwei ty: 2p:::to; : :»f v .....:.. f•::oti::•an:: n;.: ;:1.0:o..;.:r:: ;.::.:f<:::;<.:<:f: m<fiiv : 5>fe t�.to ro : > ::>:::: :: > :>:::::'::::::>::> :::>:: .:.::::: :::<::::> . .:.: e�5�..ee a d•o• e.s.deya.d.se:back.:ro::::::::e:.( .).:::e..: ...: e.::.:::::: :::.:::::.�::::::: : ...•::•`B..... s:::•:'.., :.::::: :::::>: ::::::s::::?:z.::::.:.::.< ' .:.....::..:: . ...00A7IONOF..PROP.OSQL.::::::.::::.:::::::..360.7,.Lake:Was. .n. o.... ....d.... . .......................:.. .:::...::::::::.::: :.:.:.:.:..:.:..;. 'io 4 / : v — — — — — — — — ®/ a / o ,{5, a II - - 11 �• -- - - - - - ,ia . / , e . 'q't ' / / . , ti I z" _ __ . _ _ _ ______.a a m.i 7 �� N I • - - - - - - -- �,s/; 2 i. Yo - - - - — - -- 54 /. . � / , i / / - - - — - -- -- •5 6 ,/'-# . / S0 ` - - - - - - - - S8 i\ - - - - - -- - " / 41- 1 60 .._....- —...._................._.-..-,_— 3S . Q , ./ . v C k4,22 -- -. -- - - - --- ,/4°,..c,/ 3.Q/ / /;I/` k cirri.;,•/_ J G°��\. S s I ,I 1 I it 1 I Technical Advisory Commitl taff Report • Deeds Shoreline Exemption and Variances July 13, 1990 Page 2 • LAND USE ELEMENTS 1. Whether the proposed use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan? The proposed use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Map which designates the subject site for single-family residential use. It also generally is consistent with the Goals and Policies for single-family residential use as stated in the Comprehensive Plan. 2. Whether the proposed use is consistent with the'Land Use Map and the applicable zoning ordinances? The proposed single-family residence is allowed outright in the R-1 zone in which the subject property is located. The proposed single-family development does not meet two setback provisions of the Renton Zoning Code, Section 4-31-5 (C) (4), nor does it meet the setback requirement from Lake Washington as stated in the Shorelines Master Program, Section 4.07.02 (D) and Section 7.14.01 (B). An exemption and a variance are sought from the Shorelines Master Program and two variances from the Zoning Code. Variances are sought from the Zoning Code to reduce the front yard setback from twenty (20) feet to five (feet) and to reduce one sideyard setback from five (5) feet to zero feet. A variance is sought from the Shorelines Master Plan to reduce the rear yard setback from twenty (20) feet (minimum setback from Lake Washington) to fifteen (15) feet. r. The Hearing Examiner has the authority to grant variances, provided that the following conditions are met: City Code 4-31-19(F)(3): The Hearing Examiner....shall have authority to grant a variance upon making a determination in writing that the conditions specified below have been found to exist: 1) That the applicant suffers undue hardship and the variance is necessary because of special circumstances applicable to subject property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings of the subject property, and the strict application of the Zoning Code is found to deprive subject property owner of rights and privileges enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity and under identical zone classification: Variance• (a): ,request to reduce the back yard (Lake Washington frontage) setback from twenty (20) to fifteen (15) feet: The applicant does suffer undue hardship and there are special circumstances that would justify granting this variance. The lot is of an unusual shape, being nearly a parallelogram and smaller than average even in this lake front residential area which has many small lots. The buildable area of the lot is approximately 2,465 square feet. The houses on either side of the subject site are setback approximately fifteen (15) feet from the lake front. Variance (b): request to reduce the front yard setback from twenty (20) to five (5) feet. The applicant does suffer undue hardship and there are special circumstance as stated in Variance (a) above. However, a five (5) foot setback does not seem adequate from the road easement. Averaging the setbacks of the houses on each side of the Deeds property (not including carports) it is found that the average setback from the road is fifteen (15) feet. Staff recommend that the new Deeds residence be required to be setback fifteen (15) feet also. • Variance (c): request to reduce the side yard setback on the north side of the property from five (5) feet to zero setback. Staff recommend that this request be 'denied.'The special circumstances described in Variance (a) above do not justify a zero setback. The fire danger of construction on a lot line is severe. 2) That the granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public•welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which subject property is situated: Technical Advisory Commit itaff Report ' Deeds Shoreline Exemption.and Variances July 13, 1990 Page 3 The granting of variances (a) and (b), as modified by staff recommendations, will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property in the'vicinity, however, granting of variance (c) would be materially detrimental to the public welfare because of the fire hazard involved. 3) That approval shall not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitation upon uses of other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is situated: The granting of variances (a) and (b), as modified by staff recommendation, would not constitute a grant of special privilege since they are consistent with existing uses in the immediate vicinity. However, the granting of variance (c) would be a grant of special privilege and a fire hazard. It is true that the existing Deeds carport wall is on the lot line, but when new residences are constructed, they should conform to all regulations unless sound grounds for a variance can be shown. 4) That the approval as determined by the Hearing Examiner is a minimum variance that will accomplish the desired purpose: The granting of the three variances is the minimum action that would accomplish the desired purpose. However, the granting of variances (a) and (b), as modified by the staff recommendations, and the denial of'•variance (c) would allow the applicant to construct a house that would reasonably fulfill his needs without being detrimental to nearby residents. I Staff recommend that variance (a) be approved, that variance (b) be approved with the modifications recommended by Staff, and variance (c) be denied. ;I >;;;;: COIVIMEIVTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTIMENTS • .ous.C. de artments have reviewed and commented u on the ro ect hese co....... ..,.s:..: . .I o Ren on .. d o Co e 1VG TC ..• • a • July 13, 1990 To: Paul Lumbert Mark Isaacson Fire Marshall Sam Chastain Penny Bryant Jim Hanson From: Don Erickson, Chairm :;:Mee..ing Date........::::::::J•. : Agenda is listed below. TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE • AGENDA JULY 13, 1990 Third Floor Conference Room Commencing at 8:30 AM • • TIME/KEY PARTICIPANTS NEW PROJECTS DEEDS VARIANCES/SHORELINE VARIANCES SME;V-055-90 Applicants seek a Shorelines Master Plan Exemption from Section 4.07.02 (D) of the Renton Shorelands Master Plan and three Variances from Section 4-31-5 (C) (4) of the Renton City Code in order to build a single family residence adjacent to Lake Washington. They ° wish to reduce the setback from the lake front from twenty (20) to fifteen (15) feet, the front yard setback from . twenty (20) to five (5) feet.and one sideyard setback from five (5) feet to zero feet. BOEING WATERFRONT TRAIL ECF;SM-061-90 Design and construction of a pedestrian trail along the north boundary of Boeing's Commercial Airplane's Renton Plant. PUGET POWER SOILS REMEDIATION ECF-057-90 Removal of two tanks which are out-of-service and remediation of oil contamination of the surrounding soil. ' The work must be done during the summer months because the water table is very close to the surface in this location. We are asking for a quick turn-around on your review. KENNY VUE PRELIMINARY PLAT PP-012-90 Applicant seeks to subdivide a vacant 7.32 acre parcel into twenty-nine (29) lots for future development with 27 new single-family residences and retention of two existing • single-family residences. DISCUSSION SUNPOINTE FENCE PROPOSAL a RE1-__N COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT L__ARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET "0 ff.-o * REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: OI-4 �, 0�9 ,,I,�� k 09 'vio�4, DATE CIRCULATED: 5-11-90 COMMENTS DUE: 5-25- � ©,9 L, SME - 055 - 90 � � A, APPLICATION NO(S) : V-055-90 PROPONENT: Jay W. and Elizabeth A. Deeds PROJECT TITLE: Deeds Shoreline Exemption and Variances BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicants seek a Shorelines Master Plan Exemption from Section 4. 07 . 02 (D) of the Renton Shorelands Master Plan and three Variances from Section 4-31-5 (C) (4) of the Renton City Code in order to build a single-family residence adjacent to Lake Washington. They wish to reduce the setback from the lake front from twenty (20) to fifteen (15) feet, the front yard setback from twenty (20) to five (5) feet and one sideyard setback from five (5) feet to zero. LOCATION: 3607 Lake Washington Blvd. North SITE AREA 2 , 465 BUILDING AREA (gross) : 1, 262 .sq. ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE ' MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 0 0 0 2 . Air 0 0 ° o 0 0 3 . Water ° ° 0 o 0 0 4 . Plants 0 0 o 0 0 5. Animals 0 ° o ° 0 • 6 . Energy & Natural Resources ° ° ° o ° ° 7 . Environmental Health 0 0 0 o ° - 0 8 . Land & Shoreline Use 0 0 O 0 0 9 . Housing 0 0 o 0 0 10. Aesthetics 0 0 o ° 0 11. Light & Glare 0 0 ° O 0 0 12 . Recreation �� 0 �0 0 O O O 13 . Historic •& Cultural Preservation ° 0 0 O _- 0 0 14 . Transportation ° ° o ° ° 15. Public Services - 0 0 0 O 0 0 16 . Utilities / 0 ° COMMENT��) / '// c/S 4- 74 -7 ' S 7s•,-, 2 'I We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we ve expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where a tional i or ation is needed to properly assess this proposal. . ---.007------7--t-- i- ,..r=3--- --,75 ---9, b --Si ture of Direct4or or Authorized Representative Date Rev. 6/'8 8 A REl._..N COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Ui ARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET SME-055-90 APPLICATION NO (S) . : V-055-90 PROPONENT: Jay W. and Elizabeth A. Deeds PROJECT TITLE: Deeds Shoreline Exemption and Variances ' BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicants seek a Shorelines Master Plan Exemption from Section 4 . 07 . 02 (D) of the Renton Shorelands Master Plan and three Variances from Section 4-31-5 (C) (4) of the Renton City Code in order to build a single family residence adjacent to Lake Washington. They wish to reduce the setback from the lake front from twenty (20) to fifteen (15) feet, the front yard setback from twenty (20) to five (5) feet and one sideyard setback from five (5) feet to zero feet. LOCATION: 3607 Lake Washington Blvd. North TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 6-15-90 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON May 25, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED DATE SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 REN 1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT D LRTMENT i° ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ��� o'��O oil/ �N � REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: L'1.V1 .2,7kR-‘7,2 ��V �v�0 DATE CIRCULATED: 5-11-90 COMMENTS DUE: 5-25-90 #� ;; SME - 055 - 90 OggIWIR 1 Di APPLICATION NO(S) : V-055-90 ' MAY 1 4 1990 PROPONENT: Jay W. and Elizabeth A. Deeds CITY OF REN i ON PROJECT TITLE: Deeds Shoreline Exemption and VarianceyUBUC WORKS CUSTOMER SERVICES BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicants seek a Shorelines Master Plan 1 Exemption from Section 4 . 07 . 02 (D) of the Renton Shorelands Master Plan and three Variances from Section 4-31-5 (C) (4) of the Renton City Code in order to build a single-family residence adjacent to Lake Washington. They wish to reduce the setback from the lake front from twenty (20) to fifteen (15) , feet, the front yard setback from twenty (20) to five (5) feet and one sideyard setback from five (5) feet to zero. ' LOCATION: 3607 Lake Washington Blvd. North SITE AREA 2, 465 BUILDING AREA (gross) : 1, 262 sq. ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° ° ° O 0 0 2 . Air ° ° ° O 0 0 3 . Water ° ° ° O 0 0 4 . Plants 0 0 ° O 0--- - - --- 0 5. Animals ° ° ° O 0 0 6 . Energy & Natural Resources ° O 0 0 7 . Environmental Health 0 ° ° O 0 0 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° ° ° O 0 0 9 . Housing ° ° ° O 0 0 10. Aesthetics 0 0 0 O 0 0 11. Light & Glare 0 ° ° 1 O 0 0 12 . Recreation 0 0 0 0- - 0 0 1' 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° ° ° O 0 0 14 . Transportation 0 '— ° ° O 0 0 15 . Public Services 0 ��° 0 O O 0 i 16 . Utilities ° /...------' 0 ° COMMENTS: - _ 1 r 1 1 1 We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact orlareas where addition- 1 information is needed to operly assess this proposal.' ei--7--,,/' / . . -"`. - p Si/, v Signature of irector or Aut{ ized Repre entdtive Date 6S) 1 Rev. 6488 • RENT___ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DE_ UMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET SME-055-90 APPLICATION NO (S) . : V-055-90 PROPONENT: Jay W. and Elizabeth A. Deeds PROJECT TITLE: Deeds Shoreline Exemption and Variances BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicants seek a Shorelines Master Plan Exemption from Section 4 . 07 . 02 (D) of the Renton Shorelands Master Plan and three Variances from Section 4-31-5 (C) (4) of the Renton City Code in order to build a single family residence adjacent to Lake Washington. They wish to reduce the setback from the lake front from twenty (20) to fifteen (15) feet, the front yard setback from twenty (20) to five (5) feet and . one sideyard setback from five (5) feet to zero feet. LOCATION: 3607 Lake Washington Blvd. North TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 6-15-90 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNIITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON May 25, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: , yam Oipaea--- )e--7 1 APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED 7•• // - -_--� DATE SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 it\ RE ...-.4 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT D�rARTMENT 0*4/V G ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET 0,�'94'0% 41411. 7 �sREVIEWING DEPARTMENT: �'�,� 1900 DATE CIRCULATED: 5-11-90 COMMENTS DUE : 5(,J25t,(,0 ' `tea, SME - 055 - 90 D E C c; O , i APPLICATION NO(S) : V-055-90 MAY f 4 1990 ' ttt PROPONENT: Jay W. and Elizabeth A. Deeds .1 PROJECT TITLE: Deeds Shoreline Exemption and Variance, I BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicants seek a Shorelines Master Plan ' Exemption from Section 4. 07. 02 (D) of the Renton Shorelands Master Plan and three Variances from Section 4-31-5 (C) (4) of the Renton City Code in order to build a single-family residence adjacent to Lake Washington. They wish to reduce the setback from the lake front from twenty (20) to fifteen (15) , feet, the front yard setback from twenty (20) to five (5) feet and one sideyard setback from five (5) feet to zero. LOCATION: 3607 Lake Washington Blvd. North SITE AREA 2 , 465 BUILDING AREA (gross) : 1, 262 sq. ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 0 0 ° 0 0 0 2 . Air ° ° ° O 0 0 3 . Water ° 0 ° 0 0 0 4 . Plants 0 ° ° O 0 0 i 5 . Animals ° ° ° O 0 0 6 . Energy & Natural Resources 0 0 ° O 0 0 7 . Environmental Health ° ° ° 0 0 0 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° ° ° 9 . Housing ° ° ° ° ° ° 10. Aesthetics ° ° ° 0 0 0 11. Light & Glare ° ° O 0 0 12 . Recreation ° ° ° 0 0 0 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° ° ° O 0 0 14 . Transportation 0 0 0 O 0 0 15. Public Services 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 . Utilities ° 0 0 COMMENTS: We have re ' ewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which w h e expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where ddltional info ation is. needed to properly assess this proposal. �-rnl--0 — - =/<s ' v S ' .'ture of Director or Authorized Representative Date Rev. 6/88 1 ^ RENT..... COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DE__._ZTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET SME-055-90 APPLICATION NO(S) . : V-055-90 PROPONENT: Jay W. and Elizabeth. A. Deeds PROJECT TITLE: Deeds Shoreline Exemption and Variances BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicants seek a Shorelines Master Plan Exemption from Section 4. 07 . 02 (D) of the Renton Shorelands Master Plan and three Variances from Section 4-31-5 (C) (4) of the Renton City Code in order to build a single family residence adjacent to Lake Washington. They wish to reduce the setback from the lake front from twenty (20) to fifteen (15) feet, the front yard setback from twenty (20) to five (5) feet and one sideyard setback from five (5) feet to zero feet. LOCATION: 3607 Lake Washington Blvd. North TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 6-15-90 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON May 25, 1990 . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: L,-12) C APPROVED y APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED 13L.:b6 � `le- C ock €SA)& , asp— DATE 6 —1 y - d SIGN . E OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE C REV. 6/88 4\`., A(A- REIN—N COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT E ARTMENT ei). O4,o/ ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ligi9. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: P6i4e_L 14 7 90 DATE CIRCULATED: 5-11-90 COMMENTS DUE: 5-25-90 ',, SME - 055 - 90 APPLICATION NO(S) : V-055-90 PROPONENT: Jay W. and Elizabeth A. Deeds PROJECT TITLE: Deeds Shoreline Exemption and Variances BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicants seek a Shorelines Master Plan Exemption from Section 4 . 07 . 02 (D) of the Renton Shorelands Master Plan and three Variances from Section 4-31-5 (C) (4) of the Renton City Code in order to build a single-family residence adjacent to Lake Washington. They wish to reduce the setback from the lake front from twenty (20) to fifteen (15) feet, the front yard setback from twenty (20) to five (5) feet and one sideyard setback from five (5) feet to zero. LOCATION: 3607 Lake Washington Blvd. North SITE AREA 2 ,465 BUILDING AREA (gross) : 1, 262 sq. ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 0 0 0 o ° 0 2 . Air 0 0 0 O ° 0 3 . Water 0 0 0 o ° 0 4 . Plants 0 0 0 o ° ° 5 . Animals 0 0 0 o ° 0 6 . Energy & Natural Resources 0 0 ° o ° 0 7 . Environmental Health 0 0 ° ° 0 0 8 . Land & Shoreline Use 0 0 0 o 0 0 9 . Housing 0 0 0 o ° 0 10 . Aesthetics 0 0 ° o - - 0 0 11. Light & Glare 0 0 ° o ° ° 12 . Recreation 0 0 0 o ° 0 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° 0 0 O 0 0 14 . Transportation 0 0 ° 15 . Public Services ° ✓ 0 ° o ° ° 16 . Utilities 0 0 0 COMMENTS: VA 5WM N� � ��� �� riw otA-s(,v6 nmrt-i-u-A-) [Ak, A-( (m/i/uwyk_.,00 . !Up +v,t aut,k+- wupoo pia a' , We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where addit-' onal in ormation ' s needed to properly assess this proposal., Signature of Dire Vor o 'uthorized Representative Date Rev. 6/88 RENT___ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DE ZTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET SME-055-90 APPLICATION NO(S) . : V-055-90 PROPONENT: Jay W. and Elizabeth A. Deeds PROJECT TITLE: Deeds Shoreline Exemption and Variances BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicants seek a Shorelines Master Plan Exemption from Section 4 . 07 . 02 (D) of the Renton Shorelands Master Plan and three Variances from Section 4-31-5 (C) (4) of the Renton City Code in order to build a single family residence adjacent to Lake Washington. They wish to reduce the setback from the lake front from twenty (20) to fifteen (15) feet, the front yard setback from twenty (20) to five (5) feet and one sideyard setback from five (5) feet to zero feet. LOCATION: 3607 Lake Washington Blvd. North TO: ti PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 6-15-90 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P.M. ON May 25, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: 1%Itc..<1, V APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED Algje DATE 1C -2,�0 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR`AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 REN___T COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DLL ARTMENT 1 OP'Ala �Fo&N ENVIRONMENTAL CH CKLIST REVIEW SHEET ��r 1990 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: i'f,o„,„ DATE CIRCULATED: 5-11-90 COMMENTS DUE: 5-25-90 SME - 055 - 90 APPLICATION NO(S) : V-055-90 PROPONENT: Jay W. and Elizabeth A. Deeds PROJECT TITLE: Deeds Shoreline Exemption and Variances BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicants seek a Shorelines Master Plan Exemption from Section 4 . 07 . 02 (D) of the Renton Shorelands Master Plan and three Variances from Section 4-31-5 (C) (4) of the Renton City Code in order to build a single-family residence adjacent to Lake Washington. They wish to reduce the setback from the lake front from twenty (20) to fifteen (15) feet, the front yard setback from twenty (20) to five (5) feet and one sideyard setback from five (5) feet to zero. LOCATION: 3607 Lake Washington Blvd. North SITE AREA 2 , 465 BUILDING AREA (gross) : 1, 262 sq. ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 0 0 0 o ° 0 - 2 . Air ° ° ° o ° 0 J 1 3 . Water 0 ° ° o - 0 0 4 . Plants 0 0 ° o ° 0 5. Animals ° 0 ° O 0 0 6. Energy & Natural Resources 0 ° o 0 0 7 . Environmental Health 0 0 0 o 0 0 8 . Land & Shoreline Use 0 ° o 0 0 9 . Housing 0 ° ° o ° ° 10. Aesthetics 0 0 ° O 0 0 11. Light & Glare 0 0 ° o ° ° 12 . Recreation 0 0 ° o ° 0 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° °' 0 O 0 0 -- - - - -14 . Transportation ° ° ° o ° ° 15 . Public Services 0 0 ° O O O 16 . Utilities ° X ° ° COMMENTS: 566 COWMEN TW ps-Tmmen DEueLOPHiNiC AQPUcpervop 4LEuiew SHEET . 0," We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly ssess this proposal. PDC:uv C-t A-C-V u� P SPA"" /1 U Signature of Director or Authorized Representative 0 Date Rev. 6/88 r RENTJ. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DErtit.TMENT a I DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET SME-055-90 APPLICATION NO (S) . : V-055-90 PROPONENT: Jay W. and Elizabeth A. Deeds 1 PROJECT TITLE: Deeds Shoreline Exemption and Variances BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicants seek a Shorelines Master Plan Exemption from Section 4 . 07 . 02 (D) of the Renton Shorelands Master Plan and three Variances from Section 4-31-5 (C) (4) of the Renton City Code in order to build a single family residence adjacent to Lake Washington. They wish to reduce the setback from the lake front from twenty (20) to fifteen (15) feet, the front yard setback from twenty (20) to five (5) feet and one sideyard setback from five (5) feet to zero feet. LOCATION: 3607 Lake Washington Blvd. North TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 6-15-90 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN! WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON May 25, 1990. IEWING DEPART NT/ ISION: 1rAtet2- (II-hilt' M611-- Div ,)f. Fo& VARi 1\14c6 ONLY APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED pp �,c�000 ��f.Gai h0 Gt�cv 34007 4dk . ss qd DE ?ER fRelrii3v1 1Q6 HA2S)I ArL,' '.:E6Ew) A WA)eA+41" 's REQui Qf0 lu',TW ih1 Soo feel- of -r+it noose, 5-fizti-Cutie- 1\6 CAIA. 5t /cisVI \ 09-Avis is APPQox tiA et'( 650 fEE( 5u4sC-cf 99-069=0( , A NEW MOV.�n,r MSc iresriu.en Oiima.) SMio 200 4ffEr Feu"' 'tp 'D�JEt0,PM 0`2 Q'Nclitu-clio*i 1}, Meth(p.W Ek Tf G 4 I REltua2c-D. r A99 04,K vkvs< suit 11" p cfPAQATE WINTE11)6eN EkVNSo.J PI.A) .fi, riLhlitt,/ 4 9U ezta f� CoWs'rim�ON kr/ UN STAapAIIO fort 6\1610E i OrretssiOJ or C rft - 1" RM'- O P EQn G is MP( 6 UiVADD Tn f�Te o The Lu irri a,�- '6 hDdIK• DATE 6 l4 l 410 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 1 p44 I RENiug COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 0?y`4,4,0 ' oe*64,yob ENVIRONMENTAL - ECKLIST REVIEW SHEET A°"d4r Al REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: i�eU�JU Arm ,_.,, �7'940 7811 DATE CIRCULATED: 5-11-90 COMMENTS DUE: 5-25-90 SME - 055 - 90 APPLICATION NO(S) : V-055-90igoirm41 PROPONENT: Ja W. and Elizabeth A. Deeds y MAY 1 4 1990 PROJECT TITLE: Deeds Shoreline Exemption and Vararlf- 8stoi s;�vc+� BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicants seek a i�Oa er Plan Exemption from Section 4. 07 . 02 (D) of the Rent IQ ter Plan and three Variances from Section 4-31-5 (C) (4) of the Renton City Code in order to build a single-family residence adjacent to Lake Washington. They wish to reduce the setback from the lake front from twenty (20) to fifteen (15) 1feet, the front yard setback from twenty (20) to five (5) feet and one sideyard setback from five (5) feet to zero. . LOCATION: 3607 Lake Washington Blvd. North SITE AREA 2 , 465 BUILDING AREA (gross) : 1, 262 sq. ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 0 0 0 O 0 0 2 . Air 0 0 0 O 0 0 I 3 . Water 0 0 0 O 0 0 4 . Plants 0 0 0 O 0 0 5 . Animals 0 0 0 O 0 0 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° ° ° O 0 0 7 . Environmental Health 0 0 0 O 0 0 8 . Land & Shoreline Use 0 0 0 O 0 0 9 . Housing ° ° ° O 0 o 10 . Aesthetics 0 0 0 O 0 0 1 11. Light & Glare 0 0 0 O 0 0 1 12 . Recreation 0 0 0 O 0 0 ' 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° 0 0 O 0 0 14 . Transportation 0 0 0 O 0 0 15. Public Services 0 0 0 O 0 0 16. Utilities 0 :✓ 0 0 COMMENTS: I - . We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or ,lareas where/ ,/ dditional i ,formation is needed to properly asses this proposal.! fN ��K/..✓.-. � yii RX i 7 199� Signature of Director orCuthorized Representative § Date Rev. 6/88 � r , RENTGiv COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET SME-055-90 APPLICATION NO(S) . : V-055-90 PROPONENT: Jay W. and Elizabeth A. Deeds PROJECT TITLE: Deeds Shoreline Exemption and Variances BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicants seek a Shorelines Master Plan Exemption from Section 4 . 07 . 02 (D) of the Renton Shorelands Master Plan and three Variances from Section 4-31-5 (C) (4) of the Renton City Code in order to build a single family residence adjacent to Lake Washington. They wish to reduce the setback from the lake front from twenty (20) to fifteen (15) feet, the front yard setback from twenty (20) to five (5) feet and one sideyard setback from five (5) feet to zero feet. LOCATION: 3607 Lake Washington Blvd. North TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 6-15-90 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON May 25, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: W -2 APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS OT APPROVED LJ ij ,;7-1.(A,cycpta„ C,Cu- �'"j /h1—4 DATE /6 T / %) SIGNATURE OF DIRE TOR OR AU ORIZE REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 4 , A REN.UN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DLPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CH5CKLIST REVIEW SHEET op'.04, REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: �ULP� � , M04 DATE CIRCULATED: 5-11-90 COMMENTS DUE: 5 25 90 �`4t RENTON FIRE De SME - 055 - 90 FIRE PREVENTION BUREA APPLICATION NO(S) : V-055-90 MAY 1 41990 PROPONENT: Jay W. and Elizabeth A. Deeds RECEIVED PROJECT TITLE: Deeds Shoreline Exemption and Variances 1i BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicants seek a Shorelines Master Plan Exemption from Section 4 . 07 . 02 (D) of the Renton Shorelands Master Plan and three Variances from Section 4-31-5 (C) (4) of the Renton City Code in order to build a single-family residence adjacent to Lake Washington. They wish to reduce the setback from the lake front from twenty (20) to fifteen (15) feet, the front yard setback from twenty (20) to five (5) feet and one sideyard setback from five (5) feet to zero. LOCATION: 3607 Lake Washington Blvd. North SITE AREA 2,465 BUILDING AREA (gross) : 1, 262 sq. ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 0 ° ° O 0 0 2 . Air ° ° ° O 0 0 3 . Water ° 0 ° O 0 0 4 . Plants 0 ° ° O 0 0 5 . Animals ° ° ° O 0 0 6 . Energy & Natural Resources ° ° ° O 0 0 7 . Environmental Health 0 ° O 0 0 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° ° ° O 0 0 9 . Housing 0 ° O 0 0 10. Aesthetics ° ° ° O 0 0 11. Light & Glare ° ° ° O 0 0 12 . Recreation ° ° ° O 0 0 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° 0 0 O 0 0 14 . Transportation 0 ° 0 0 15 . Public Services 0 0 0 O 0 0 16. Utilities 0 0 0 COMMENTS: . 77:az 4/ g,e,n!-24.1 g/t_eryeig, We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative D e Rev. 6/88 RENT_; COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEF--ATMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET SME-055-90 APPLICATION NO(S) . : V-055-90 PROPONENT: Jay W. and Elizabeth A. Deeds PROJECT TITLE: Deeds Shoreline Exemption and Variances BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicants seek a Shorelines Master Plan Exemption from Section 4 . 07 . 02 (D) of the Renton Shorelands Master Plan and three Variances from Section 4-31-5 (C) (4) of the Renton City Code in order to build a single family residence adjacent to Lake Washington. They wish to reduce the setback from the lake front from twenty (20) to fifteen (15) feet, the front yard setback from twenty (20) to five (5) feet and one sideyard setback from five (5) feet to zero feet. LOCATION: 3607 Lake Washington Blvd. North TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 6-15-90 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON May 25, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: fr Ppet...rey-NA-4:vv APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED —Xi4 At4c 0-1'2-0 77-4791 74:6?-) _4:a) /I-227 1/64, �� DATE ',ley /'cam SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 I RENTuN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DErARTMENT 10 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET /tel c�,c9tOi��si REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: r4 9 j? 6(. 2-4'— it CZ. 90 : _ U : 5-11-90 COMMENTS DU ;i b "11) APPLICATION NO(S) : V-055-90 MAY 1 4 1990 PROPONENT: Jay W. and Elizabeth A. Deeds CITY Or Ktivivol PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT TITLE: Deeds Shoreline Exemption and VariancST0MER SERVICES BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicants seek a Shorelines Master Plan Exemption from Section 4 . 07 . 02 (D) of the Renton Shorelands Master Plan and three Variances from Section 4-31-5 (C) (4) of the Renton City Code in order to build a single-family residence adjacent to Lake Washington. They wish to reduce the setback from the lake front from twenty (20) to fifteen (15) feet, the front yard setback from twenty (20) to five (5) feet and one sideyard setback from five (5) feet to zero. LOCATION: 3607 Lake Washington Blvd. North SITE AREA 2 , 465 BUILDING AREA (gross) : 1, 262 sq. ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 0 0 0 o 0 0 2 . Air ° ° 0 o 0 0 3 . Water ° ° ° o 0 0 4 . Plants ° ° ° o 0 0 5. Animals ° ° ° o 0 0 6 . Energy & Natural Resources ° ° o ° ° 7 . Environmental Health ° ° ° o 0 0 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° 0 0 o 0 0 9 . Housing 0 0 ° o 0 0 10. Aesthetics ° 0 0 o 0 0 11. Light & Glare ° 0 0 o 0 0 12 . Recreation ° 0 ° o 0 0 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° 0 0 o 0 0 14 . Transportation 0 0 ° o 0 0 15 . Public Services ° 0 ° o 0 0 16 . Utilities ° ° ° COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly a sess this proposal. -deli. A - 1,4i, P4-5/21,/ID Signature of Director or uthorized Representative Date 6§) Rev. 6/88 , RENTOIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET SME-055-90 APPLICATION NO(S) . : V-055-90 PROPONENT: Jay W. and Elizabeth A. Deeds PROJECT TITLE: Deeds Shoreline Exemption and Variances BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicants seek a Shorelines Master Plan Exemption from Section 4. 07. 02 (D) of the Renton Shorelands Master Plan and three Variances from Section 4-31-5 (C) (4) of the Renton City Code in order to build a single family residence adjacent to Lake Washington. They wish to reduce the setback from the lake front from twenty (20) to fifteen (15) feet, the front yard setback from twenty (20) to five (5) feet and one sideyard setback from five (5) feet to zero feet. LOCATION: 3607 Lake Washington Blvd. North TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 6-15-90 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON May 25, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION COckleje APPROVED V APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED t 4 ie y e rti Si(77 Se d 1 vvElmf 4`1'rosl £:,-r) t I Pig h rshr 1 I A n a CGP9 fk b y e ��'►'►e 0� be svbw+; et ~-v Qvbl�c works en' r 115-""ct 4 rerwii+ r E►eve.,tc o s 511 a it Cd kei 6 t) Fes° -y-a I i f G.P1.4) t u I dwYls S feritaill C1ftt Cc)oit . OV . ./ AtOkteitif DATE J� 2 y `�O SIGNAT E O/4441F DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 • RENT.. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DE±_1RTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET SME-055-90 APPLICATION NO(S) . : V-055-90 PROPONENT: Jay W. and Elizabeth A. Deeds PROJECT TITLE: Deeds Shoreline Exemption and Variances BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicants seek a Shorelines Master Plan Exemption from Section 4 . 07 . 02 (D) of the Renton Shorelands Master Plan and three Variances from Section 4-31-5 (C) (4) of the Renton City Code in order to build a single family residence adjacent to Lake Washington. They wish to reduce the setback from the lake front from twenty (20) to fifteen (15) feet, the front yard setback from twenty (20) to five (5) feet and one sideyard setback from five (5) feet to zero feet. LOCATION: 3607 Lake Washington Blvd. North TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 6-15-90 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON May 25, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED DATE 7/� SIGNA E OF DIRECTOR R AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 REN'.. �N COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Di. ARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: DATE CIRCULATED: 5-11-90 COMMENTS DUE: 5-25-90 SME - 055 - 90 APPLICATION NO(S) : V-055-90 PROPONENT: Jay W. and Elizabeth A. Deeds PROJECT TITLE: Deeds Shoreline Exemption and Variances BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicants seek a Shorelines Master Plan Exemption from Section 4 . 07 . 02 (D) of the Renton Shorelands Master Plan and three Variances from Section 4-31-5 (C) (4) of the Renton City Code in order to build a single-family residence adjacent to Lake Washington. They wish to reduce the setback from the lake front from twenty (20) to fifteen (15) feet, the front yard setback from twenty (20) to five (5) feet and one sideyard setback from five (5) feet to zero. LOCATION: 3607 Lake Washington Blvd. North SITE AREA 2 ,465 BUILDING AREA (gross) : 1, 262 sq. ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° ° ° O 0 0 2 . Air 0 0 0 O 0 0 3 . Water ° 0 0 O O 0 4 . Plants 0 0 0 O 0 0 5. Animals ° 0 0 O 0 0 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° 0 O 0 0 7 . Environmental Health 0 0 0 O O O 8 . Land & Shoreline Use 0 ° O O O 9 . Housing ° 0 O 0 0 10. Aesthetics 0 0 0 O 0 0 11. Light & Glare ° ° ° O 0 0 12 . Recreation 0 0 0 O 0 0 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° 0 0 O 0 0 14 . Transportation ° ° ° O 0 0 15 . Public Services ° 0 0 O 0 0 16 . Utilities 0 0 ° COMMENTS: ` 4A1, 4 v A. ISt ! ra 114" SOL R \ k. c{ C.. "' u t — c� t� n ( A S 4.0 A tst t , " ff (1` t. i f` ' C?`�J. K.�l✓P� 1 t' *� Q& \ + ° I l 1 ;•. G_ cY\ -,s._.._ , 'h. 1.. (;.v.V�f�.•,5 _ `�.�;;.c l ... '- ,�-.'i.. I�.l,._q 1.,,L.l�t1 4 I - f (r, We have reHewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. C /7/?6 Signature of Di ector or Authorized Representative Date Rev. 6/88 REN'i JN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DL=ARTMENT c/4,NC,+ ENVIRONMENTA CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET �'4k �nilA'�' REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: C. ,��799 Cam? ( .€ 9 - �VO DATE CIRCULATED: 5-11-90 COMMENTS DUE: 5- 90 `6 SME - 055 - 90 APPLICATION NO(S) : V-055-90 PROPONENT: Jay W. and Elizabeth A. Deeds PROJECT TITLE: Deeds Shoreline Exemption and Variances BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicants seek a Shorelines Master Plan Exemption from Section 4 . 07 . 02 (D) of the Renton Shorelands Master Plan and three Variances from Section 4-31-5 (C) (4) of the Renton City Code in order to build a single-family residence adjacent to Lake Washington. They wish to reduce the setback from the lake front from twenty (20) to fifteen (15) feet, the front yard setback from twenty (20) to five (5) feet and one sideyard setback from five (5) feet to zero. LOCATION: 3607 Lake Washington Blvd. North SITE AREA 2 , 465 BUILDING AREA (gross) : 1, 262 sq. ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 0 0 0 o 0 0 2 . Air 0 0 0 O 0 0 3 . Water 0 0 0 O 0 0 4 . Plants 0 0 0 O 0 0 5 . Animals ° 0 0 O 0 0 6 . Energy & Natural Resources ° ° 0 O 0 0 7 . Environmental Health 0 0 0 O 0 0 8 . Land & Shoreline Use 0 0 0 O 0 0 9 . Housing 0 0 0 O 0 0 10. Aesthetics 0 0 0 O 0 0 11. Light & Glare 0 0 0 O 0 0 12 . Recreation ° 0 0 O 0 0 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° 0 0 O 0 0 14 . Transportation ° 0 0 o 0 0 15. Public Services 0 0 0 O 0 0 16 . Utilities 0 0 0 COMMENTS: • 5 Nv A S cAx.e Frrt-►u-t 6z- 4 (e,,•51511 rz, cog . 1-k. Cc iuo wv, c ELICLt 57- 77 We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where a d' io a information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signatuie of Director or Authorized Representative Dat� Rev. 6/88 RENTOir COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPru2TMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET SME-055-90 APPLICATION NO(S) . : V-055-90 PROPONENT: Jay W. and Elizabeth A. Deeds PROJECT TITLE: Deeds Shoreline Exemption and Variances BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicants seek a Shorelines Master Plan Exemption from Section 4 . 07 . 02 (D) of the Renton Shorelands Master Plan and three Variances from Section 4-31-5 (C) (4) of the Renton City Code in order to build a single family residence adjacent to Lake Washington. They wish to reduce the setback from the lake front from twenty (20) to fifteen (15) feet, the front yard setback from twenty (20) to five (5) feet and one sideyard setback from five (5) feet to zero feet. LOCATION: 3607 Lake Washington Blvd. North TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 6-15-90 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON May 25, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: 61411;644.r. V&ANMAI) APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED S�C'$aCK ( .) LN4e- err tziCc.eZI, Se7134411._ A. s1 Q 3 ibc.)0?-‘406 U.,«s d 1 2 c eoliver T1 i i,q NU smTk t _ mu_ peT-Ea. I NQ F tt (1-9 4. G+^�f DATE ( Z-.3 SIGNATURE OF D RECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE l REV. 6/88 1 . • • . . . „,- •,1'..•-v.t.;. -•'.- 4.. . . •f:,4 ,,,I,i'•4.4';'"P.:4•4:-• •:-.:.••"44..4,;",..... ....,.: ..',.....;.,. , ..,. i,,,,,-, '' '''s'.- •:,... ••••-..,...„,:;,,, ---,i.:,:-:.:... , ,..!fix-,,,,..s-,,,, .1,14,,,,,,,...,;;., C--t-..,..,-- ,...,,,,;-„..,;-:-' ., •.,•‘":.;.-T, '''', '`",•,',414..;':::••,'•-it;,X"ra:',,I.,,,V,,,-,,,• ' ,%% 1,,,•• , ' •'1 : ,: '. '''',,.,,,--,/-,,,,,,,kir'•6F• ,K4,,,, •,„;',444::‘, .::.6:.' „",,,z'6:::',.:!.', •7';',';Y, ;.;44....••4•N• ,..i.,,..':'•;:i'W.4 " ''''''''•' .;'''k": ,,::' ••••- 4 , ,j,r4t. . ' • " •,: ,"4- .'"• ", "F ''`..''' :',' 'k ..,.:: '',,,',"- ..:,::4N ,- •:' .6.•::••4° 0 -':'. ."'''''':',•';', ',,, q,;. t'. . ..ti'-, 7,4" ., •''• `:: ',:...:,,. , . ,..„. ,.,4,,24-.1;;!',J,f%-r,a: .,,-, %•'..,.,,...2../ ,,,.:, ,,..,A, ',:,,,,, :0_, , •.„.''''',..„„'„.1NE.-. . „..„., „....,,,..,,,..,,,,.- ,-.,. i.-, ; ••••`•• :,.,--.I: :,.',.....:'-..1.• •'t,''''','.•' '•''''':: :••• • '; :" ,'":";-:, •-,•,', :,'• . '':., ': ' '•44 .Z4trf,;•;;;fc?;•• ,•:)',,Ai"it4•••,,,,t',17,14,•[,,,,- ,,,-•", -, :,:,.!,..,., ,,,,,,,14,,,,,,,:,.,,,,„,,,„.,,,,,,,:.,,,,,,,, , , ,. ,,, ,,,,., ,f:..,,:),,,.,.,, , .; . . , .,.".;':.::'q-7.!P•-):Er47,,}S!: • A.!•Fii.ii::44.!.,..!'''''-' ......:,,,Ii. :el:'..;',.;,:'.'...', .'..--,21.,..:, -. , . -:, '-,',„ -‘,..,.,.:-::,,, ,, ..-.: 7., .::- . . ..-', ',-,!Yz.`,%!kel-,,i,1-',1z. ,, •••.';';igrni'44Ai4;.;,',' •,.." '`-.4,' •''''.....'-'5:4.„'.'''.':. •'"'''-',• ' ' ::',..., f'4'..•,'4.•4-,•'•...2.", , ;'`;',•- • ' '' ' 4 3.'OF :'. -•:':,.-. , ' y.,...;.; .-r...• . ,.. • . , : . , -..:,,•:.•;;•...‘,.,i.:,i4,1,!•v0 4,-4 ..::fi';'0'.4-"!,,,,,'.' ',.: PENDING• ... r ,.,APPLICATION "c , • gill. ORE . .. .4...4*. ,!,.;1. .,. tA.,. .... ...",.A.,'. i , ',/',,,,,,,,,4,--, .q.;,-n.,4,.* .,47..:,,i';''-::,.1..2, . ‘. :, , ,-. ,./ •, ,: .:., :•',,,'.,,. ' o'-.....* - .'"..--lik'-4 i *1' '* '•• " ' ' .1.4:4,14!;, -••;. ;:::;:li,-,•;, .' S MEV 055-9 ,,*F:. ,.. -..4.-,,..L,,..;,. ..1!„.7..',, '..,,..,...,,,f,,,,,.',,r,!--.,:.:,,,,-.:„ •. . .', 7,04N,•. - ', .. . . ',. '•,:-..:.•'• ,•-,. ...•.c.', 1,,',.,:.,:,!,,,'„,..,••:-. ' . . ,-,,I,, :, FILE ,-.NO (St.;)!;:4144-15424,p....414.:-h;A ik-,,.: 1 , - . . i IZAbETiLl A'•-DEEDSI:!4,::- .A rtrt' ...%,,..%" .itLl''''' .r. .,„,':721..,.-7..,;;. .:7..1,144,424.2.1..JAY NAL 4,EL , .„ lv,,,ItgatiokaK,,:,;:,,,,,,,"`":".:.1.,`'L....,:•':i...,•":-..r':- 44 r r LI V4 Mill 11'''•`,4:';''c•t4',:•;4-f4'FaittrialaIt,a'AVP-k6,-,?;:•,";•-.:•:.',: „:s'.•"'• -,":"'''''' -.''''''•••I;:14.. , ._ ;.,; ,,,, .,:,. ;,-4";,..1-.• :'. .' ''.•V'',1,,t•ie,,,i..,:;:;.'2'.• - -• ' •.... „,,. - ,,., '„::- .0'‘fe i4,,,Viki : -',..r„::"i,t14i3O;44, -,' 1."4. ,-,,;a , '".( ‘,:',.:,'' ,,,,,,'..„-r,,,". '',.-,: r ' -c' :a ic . N',?1,:••,.i,4;,,-1.,7"4 ,•• 1,,,,:::,,,,,,4,-,,,,4 y,,:,,,',,:,.,,.,.,j:..,,-.,,-i.,.•.,a:•:,„,....,„.-„e,,,.,•,.i,-,,L,1..„:,-.,...-,,,•:,,,,„-,„,,,,,',,;,,A,,,,,.','.:r,i,,.,,y,I,,71,,,,,,,,,,,.,,,.,:,,,,,.',,.,,.,:..?,,;v:ii.,.,,,,,,,4a-,m01,,,'::,,,,,..„:..i,,i.nI,c,e,,.-...?-,.,,,,4.-•,•:-4..,..-t,,,,.-,:,y,•;.r::..,.,-:,...,;.,..::y;•:..::,:,:,:,,,:.:,,;,,:,.,.....-.•;: oto, W '''''2'''''''.''''f* ''''' '.11444 -. !;'''•::t.,4 ';•'' ,Wilif'5;:lf4i4i•k44-,-'..4,-;:,'',.114zi".•::ilriit,41.:;'irtk;; -: ,-'?„',:',-,:i.,,•,,,,•,. ,H. 4 :..: .A t,•'.1.'' -- :',• '; ''. . 'f ' ''SebtiOn '7 q;),A;.',76,:',1,_,,''-;:.-t:F'P'."4!!'tt,e,,-: ''''''''''''='4; " ' '' '''. .4'•• — • .'Pli-'iE*emption'from, . ,4.07.02;.,:::. 65-151[6d6t1-seel.,5:'," "t 1.19,rel..i_nes3Master, ''ID. lanild'thred,VrianceS,'...from,§ection.,L, • ( YOfitheTteritoheStiorelp:dsMstet...'.,..,...,„1, .. 4 cii*derT-tO:'.ibuild;:.a.;single":,.fallii.ly,5,::.:::,-•.„...-..!,:::.-:.,. : • 4 31 t:5.A(Cy,t(4) Ofktb.elftekgpn,iigityl4Q.9 .1l RC.. -.‘ wish "redudejthe"sbtbacw:Ji•-., ,,,, :,:.-: d.- ' - ''I''''a.kenttlei'Lakelt,WashinptOn _, to,,, . _ ., f '4 lientyf(20)!,cififteent(15)feet; the rot) y . f t''ard setback' ..',..,.., , . ••,41,,,,,,Ifrom!th9,'Slakelrontl r.or,r,t, , (5) feet "' -•.:',-.-'.-,..ct'Olie•Sidejtard setback from,five from'AiiveitSi.,1(2Q,$t,oi,fiN:t&T(5)..letj4r1, ,: ,. ,,.:....:...,...e.,,,...,.,...,.: .:, , .4.- ,,,,.:.,....,,!.,./.,, f-,-. -.:.;.f.,-4..-*.:•, 1: •'''''4',',4441,,,,t,',,,k,,-;+;.;•4,,k•,,•`,•,,..0".,:,t,-qt"','- •,-.'' ,',",•,,* , •.'':'' '"?-:::-.',-.•:'". g::•:;:44,to-iei-!:-i-feet,,,-i.:';',*;4!.'.:',5'4:',`Plic ivi.:, ',,,,,v-v4,',,;.Ns',Z , . •:,,,,,,47,,,t,Pr',.44,, liojti' :1,',..-i '-', -...,,,',,i,t.:.,.•:', ',Y-,',..,...-•:.,;-„,',..',:..:,'..u,,p,,,,. -,. -,,,-...,i„,:q .jt-1..,,,,,•:vy.k?,:,,,,.-ii.44:-:.-7„,.4_,.. ,',,,,,',;,,,',;,..:4,;;,.._1,,,tizii,-.,',- ',,,',..,A.•, ;',.:,:.r:.;',-i:.;,P;,',t,',',,•q,..i':p:-!:i i-;,.r';,',,,..,,. ..'...',:: ":-,'-'-i -,,v,i.'4''''',.''' ,,: ''....:,:',V.:.: '2".•:,',...:`,.,:4.14,:`,•;:0'•„0.,i t t',...,,4,..te,t.'...'',--,:4,:,...,t144,' ...,-4.'71,,i',i4.'"?.t. ''4'„., ...:','41`..tV4':';::i'10)':'"I'..:'',..•Ii;,,',,..,:4-v :::',•,'"....i':;41'•••.,;:e.f-A,Aii.,,,,:, ,, ,. --,,,,t,,,,,: ,....,,, ,.•,,, .,,,,,,,,t,,.., ',7j ',r;••• '' .,4,044404'' ' .. .'''.'1' c',.'.'.:,.,Ht...",.`''....*;?..;.f. :•;•1'..1',`..' :• :,'.,'',,,';:s4):,,rik.O.V ?-.7.,41.4-,2 A:',11,:'-'. -Arip..tit,:-.',,Y40,:';:..,-g.41, ..,,,,4',,. -,., .,,,,,,,,,,,4-p,',„.442.',",,..-.::..'L,' 71:--....:. 2.11'''":.,3•i'4';.t4 :"'.'' "• i -.:z..,,,=r,..,,,,',,,,;,,31•W"-‘,4i:i.;•ft.....,ii '.z,',';fr.' ,.1 v.t1,7,:.t!:0,' c,„„p.:'i,t,:',,;',.4-•,;,:.*L.'P.,..•47' .;ii*,1 444 OleirM 4:". ,''''tV','*:,;:* ,"• . '',%,.; ,;,-.., _.::,!3';':r,r, ..,.-'.; . '',:,',-ilhir ...':' xt ..;*71..ri...eti!,::;::,W,,.,'!,..,41,3,,...',4:.'• :‘,,,„•.,_;,,.:-,,,,:,„=.',.-':.'•,4.- ,,,„ . 4,,,,,,„14 1.,r . --,..,-,..-:.-',.,vf,',',A17,-.--',41r..,,A.,..p ,-,y,,,,8,At, .;,e.4,,,:',.;.-14,..,ocr:,,,,,i,;,,,,',,,--,-, ,4,..:',,,,., ,;,„J•,, 1:.iii..4V44.;^,,;414-40,i i r A''.."7-':*.`::;'.•"''1;i'll,.''.*':',;,'.`t'''.-';';.:,41*"Y,,,,••• "': ' 4W• '.#.• 17', '.;''*''•.r.t'':':''''':]:/.*::;,:-.!':;'':.1'..:*';....f, :::t'741.;;;;.','.. ;: ...Li......: •,,,,..,my.,•*...e: '-., ,,, ,.,'.• , _.... ' t, -Ki—P P.': '' 1,17;CA''n- —a-rAND/OR '''''.........._.:._....t.....',...s.,.....,._,..._..„, , „.„,, .,Itiewr_14.464.-:::•'§,..Y4'.4. 4z,:;';•,41:''!•:'.:,r,4:774 f;'::- ,-;:::,:: ' 4.:,. , • N,--,'"-',.!:.•,.',...:,:g,''.4. ".4 , ',WW.Piql.'7 '-:.....„:,:a:F,Ye.!...:4:.::•%','' ..-'i,:''' ' n:',',:'::. ^'?;:;',?:;': ' , ','•-*- ''s;ritt.2•'-,'i,•(•:..-•;11:!;'....5 4.n..,:,.,..Y ,'•,... ,41 •.,.. ',...i. f..1-:. ., • ,:l.,,,,,'-:;:,'.,,,,A;1)•:?:,:.,,i'lt.;'..-,..-;;,,,.',•,:.-,,t . '••,..',',1:C.-;‘,.1.'e4:.!.:- ,,, -• , -, , . ,,,,,,,,,r.,,` 4A,,...,,I. .*1 lt..,: :,,,,,;,,,,,.,,.1., .,..i.-.r,, ,,, ;..,,,.,.,;r,.,,,L,:', 4,4 ,.•....fiv.4::-,',`,•'.',V,'445..,,,,i':.:`',.141;44, qfli,::',A'',',.',:'-'',.,. • ....,..,.,z.;, --, '':;.'','‘,',4' -. i,',:iie.,q4,,,i,',.:'s'''''‘'''..1:'4';'0.7'4.'. '''•:''''''!-'''''''':41i:`''f'.'••-:;.'''''' : ;,„.i,A."', 1?",;',.,..,,,,,L,44f,::-.3,,1,41..,,,dt,:i.P3•:`.'N• '''. :•-..Z.,$,' '..4,-t.".•4 :-; ••'4,,. . ,-.''.-'1,•• =', .',"..';l'i'.„,.:1,1:ii.2 zV):, ,',:''',•;' ''.'"'4V':...-,-.-''.' • . 'i or31-6b7- :LAKLANASHINGTON,BLVD‘.N.'.:-::,A,,f.,4:7 !:':[-y- ,f:::,, •.A,.,. ' ''„....,,,. ., , tr ,.•••:',::•'''-, ---:,..g,-,y,, .'0,•-k1"•':,-."'''';',A.'iA-,,„..,..,..ikt,,,. ,:.. i...;,,:„.2,14-,.•i-31,-4,,,, ,:?,'• * :•:-.,*:,':'•,-."'-:,,.:1,.,4.,,: ?-',.•••,•,. . ..-:',,,,,...;i,..,,,,,:.0-, ,;( -,,,,,.., ,..44,..,:,;,^,:,:ilq•,--'d?,;4:t.c4i,c,,,, ,4„;,:ti',,:is l',,,!1•141`. l'',..-.:11:;:-:.•`-,;'Llik ,',.?:',.'"''t' Tri;:',0:1‘.:•:.'0:' ,•• I'i'.':I;',-;;..1:.‘.."'',':•--!:= - •,.'''....44.:,:si..,;," . "-:.:', ‘ : :`4:4_,-':,4,11.:i,-!'"'k,'-'3..„<ffir.•=,05.4., ,-.I.:::.-.`ii.A•i• 'f•.',4-:" •' ',:4;,414:•;k,'." ,:.„%,-.4,),•4,,,:•';' ,„ "" T.,..,_ ,;',..„1-4.;:,,,..0b4), . _,.sit...v64,k.,-,.;.,.:. .-,',.:......,,,,,,,,,,v,,, , ,,?..- 7,,,,,,,-.,,,,,,-f, ..!-•,*5?5,0,,,,,,137* .::,.1.-. .4,'..,1,''4i''..',44f4:.'1:''a Irl.'q"..41•i'•,', .•,"4• e,',>.,414,,,,,,f,-gdfi,:',,,"--,,,?:",,,,J:,,•f,:"%,,,F4,-,',.;:-`,',,, *,•-•,„'' ,,,,•;•''...'*' a'„; ,• :',.-1,,,,?•,•44,. ,,,•4i",•."li•;••.,t44.4,.'1'y7,!,"\ S":?:flit',:-,k.',..;.•;,. iZi'fiit': .4tri7'..i'.C.•-":f,'.-',:f•;•''k-'.':,;:r,' . ,tAt44',ilt i,_,''•":-. ..•,•:,',44,'';:.:-:`,•,'•,•-'7'-',',.•;'i-;;:pa'.'.::•..,,': '-':--5.,?7. it,*;4!-- z ,,-4,i.'N. getlt.V.1,4 k.,),,,K.,- 10;11.r..`li 'r, v..,.".'44..-,-.:eiri'-',: ;',...vi.;6,',V.i.,::Y.:,'..,:7;',.. : ,,•0•-i:.?•,,''...•i:::;!';:'...i... .'..,...T,...,• , , •,• 1.,•,..!.., 1 en,,f,•1,,,-.,0•'',.1.4,.I.‘,$. ,.,1..!::,4.',,,,, :44,4:44,4 _14.-.,-. f,,,,,,,,,,,41,,,,4. .-q ;kV„111 ;.•+,•f.'0,`,,-, ',',- ;":"••;•!.:-•••;'':*:'•,,-i-4..• ' ' ;v;".".•;';••:la14,,•4' ,1[',.•:::'''.;:z .f.-'44•,,",.i);•1 ,.,:,''', ',"!-''..1•••*,•1;41i4igik4 .,:',,',7t..-k0::• .- P-': 44."'•,"4;k:•••:t•I'g,':•,.•:4',;"' ..47'.. , .' RERA ' '.: *. ' ' ' ' t''.TH El Rd1/1 EWS '-.1*.,-.0.-* -;,:,i,;,*,/,,,,,.,., ' §ONpESIR I N G4,14TO p R ES E N. ,, ..,,..,..., ,..,...,--- t •:......'ii,,,,i,,,,,,,,T,,,,....,,,, „,„....,..,&, ''''' .''''''''sw''''. ., •.4._ , „...)Af.. , ......&....,..„4„.4,,,...4,,,,.; „:.„0:,. , ,..!:.,,,4,.:,,,,,„..:.1,,,4.,,,,‘sii;.1'r .',•,,,,, .. .,•:•,',.'f`';?:-T4•;•-;;; 4,,;.,,,';''‘,,t4t;),..;•.1,•:g,- ::41:0e.,`'...4,:.•:,1Y.:.Y,1:4*,, ,,,. 1$44.':',:::4, Alf;.=,,-H,•;;'::,,f,;:,‘.2;4§:::4-ti ic,',::. 4,::* .1,e''%:' ''';:,,),"5:!•*.,,. • ',',.;.,4'.''.•.17, , . .1.a .."-..o.. , •,?,,,itio:',45,1Aii:,.A.;-It's,',WV• :*•"-:‘":', •::•:c MIT •S' - -- i.,-,t•-,;,--,A-i:, ''.64'•"b ':''''''..'-'''''. '4§UtiSTANTU • ' SHuRELINETEF. .. - -...--..- AL' '''''''' '' ' ' SifOR.-",,, i , 1. = .i.,- -. ..., ''.00 M M ENT ... -.,-.--; ,',..;-,',:,-..4,',.--''''''''''''44'4';' .-AiRTY-.DAYS.'FRO M'' HE. ,. .. ........,3,..4,,,N,*-4.v., ---,i.;Y- cEIVEDAWITHIN T 'L- :-,' : , . , ... ,•. . ., . MUST '13E-e RE ,,, ., .. .;,...„ ,. .. ,.. , . - 0.,...40,..,ivAi..:1:%1W, ''4,VI l':,,es, 1, ,. ,A.ri, ki t Q...,..-..1%,,2-,,,,k,e,.'i ,i,,,,,,",,,:i4V:*,,,,•,,,''1.7•:,'4;;,'''4'• '',' C ' ''''' * '' ':'4'''ill . DAT E4OF P LI D LI ' iivi i im• ;::1.,'''',4:!..... ...,,;:-',,'.‘i:.',':::,4,'.4t,',.,,,..T,;71-.,!..,.:,:.7.:r:1--.:': ...: . ".•:•.:.• ,,i,4--,,;...- : •- ,,,tAsT 1 ,, ,t,,, . ,',,,,,1-;„ • ,,,,.... - 144.0,.•:',.'.•• it.• •J'.V . - . 4 : . ...„,e,..,6 .,, ,,.ro. y,-,-.. ,.:.:' •:,:-:,',:: .'..,.!-..,. :',,Y•jk'('''..,-::' :, -:..:i -,:: ' ''.:;:,':', . ,5,i',i, •' : '' :::•IN.•,••••• :•••,•-'-'••4,4 ,..:,:::,) '.•,,,-,"4:;,.",'",4.4,..,,:.•:',!.`,•4 ',•''''' -:'' - -:.'.,' ' ,' :^. ':'1,),-:',',.- "4....".k,„.. I.1,,•.',',,: ..•'', 14, ' ,5;', • , %PS','. ' ;'' `',e'',^?a 4,,,,'.„.:,' ., ; .,-.,P, '„..,-.. :,...4,,,,,,.,:imil,:.,,0•. ;,,;-.. '.' , .---....1.." -,, t i,.....,0,.,;..... r.,,,,v.i.:iAsif:,„..;,,,-1,.,,,,.:t'..:i.:,,,:z1,.„1.,,w1.1.v- .!,,- . ..,,;.4.„ .,...4,:,;.:4.1,,,, ,,.....1;;;;:t:,..,. ... : ,4.:;:'/,,,2,-.f-.-•.,3,.1.,:•',',..1T',,---'C•4'A1,It:AOT, Yit•:4a,i..rViiOFk4,tit"•,1.•,'Ri*$EN-;‘',..•,e',WTO•t•N O,n.,P L,''••A n N:A, ,\V I N4.74G.'1 DVI.'S', IO''• N 42b,...*o3,0',MI4.L,2'L.'.'e•;:0,',,'.A'"' V•.• •'E N',i't,-,,.U,,,,,,..•,,:E:„,•",••‘,,•,.,.•i,:•:S,• O,.,.,.-,,U,,.,.,,T.,..,.m,:.,,,-..,.:.,,.,,"-,...:.,..,,.-,.:.,•.„,. '. ''W-.44:.,,..','':1)vi.l'-.."'4' :‘,..Ms,+"*':•.:2 ,::'.''-ht.....•'%:-' p'''', .i,'' :.'4„f^' - t1-44,1`,,!,-,.t.."....,,,'. .. ,r..: . • 1 '; .',"'..;,',,Ne4,,,Ite,., ':'.:V.,,',1 ia,.5 ir:i'.mste,,,-,:...,:eii,.•• .i, „ • .7 ':`,`,4A c ev-.',.;.'il,'•"':..•,nr ' tq,,•.‘-•T'.4''Allrr.:.*.',":,•,..';',4;;;- ','F''" '•-.'•';'f.:-+ZI'Als,"4 ;.:. '' ":W4''!''S''''t1:0:'PHONE:.'r.235-4740 y u.,,,,!:-.„,f,,A.7,.,11.'„,.1-!,p,..1.,, ,,...'f,:;,A., .,,,,.::' ,:, ,,... .,:.,,:v:!..:... ,,,.,...-,'r .‘4,..:.,',..!,Yi..,04;934:3T-t,,,,,,f..,:_'4,•:•:4'rii, •.6.1.iF4.5.4....1 ,... :lit.•,,klia,41144114c,:i4,•;S:i5;..;,''••':.f'.:.:•,.. !?•.,;?..ii.:'444,fig....•:'•;:•,-,S.,•.' •'';-, :,,,''''',•:', 1•-•,,.!,• „:„•, E nl''''6 A/ED''t",,'' :' .. :.'•';. - : • , .i.,,,,,,,,-.,4,,q,„ ..,. .,,,i,•,••••4., --.-. ‘-.4.-.,,,,.i.:!..:,,..1-07r6:-;41'. ,,,,,,, .k.Cli•-,BEvR • : . ,,,. :,.., ''• ,,,,,,,r,:,-,;,;',(:);,..,4,t..'„':,,,, ''..*"'-''''.i.-..l&oiNOT : 4,,,,,,0,44.44,14 ,..:40,•i.4.,,,,,,, ,,,,-,4,0*,:ipi,' ,5:.-4:0.:;:f,:',.,';',0,5(.4.!.."-,.. ..?.,?,;:s,,•,..:. . •.,:„...„. 4...1,,,,, ., (4.. , ,§ ' , ,,, 11:10N.,„"a— •'.-..r '''''''' '''''• ' ' • T OUT PR 40P4 —RIt..,1 ••,,44, •• ,,,,„„ :",......„....,;.,,:.,...,t.'n.41,w',,::' .. . S,•• ' ';'i.l.t :'1'.'r'. ' '..' •;-',-Ito* , CERTIFICATION 3 COPIES OF , " HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I , M a r -S ekV c irk. THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON OR NEARBY THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY ON 5-/12 - ATTEST: subscribed and sworn to before me, a • Not;lry Public, in and for the State of Washington 1 I 44k resioi g i n kill (CUM , on the i ida S I G N E D : 7)/d.'tc,/ xfAiAe,et. 1 da,, of /11 i596',41 1 u t$ CITY OF RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Planning Division May 11, 1990 Jay W. and Elizabeth A. Deeds 3607 Lake Washington Blvd. North Renton, WA 98056 Re: Shoreline Exemption and Three Setback Variances File #SME; V-055-90 Location: 3607 Lake Washington Blvd. North Dear Mr. and Mrs. Deeds: The Community Development Department has accepted the above referenced application for preliminary review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Technical Advisory Committee on June 15, 1990. Following that review, you will be notified that: 1) your application is complete and has been scheduled for environmental review and determination or 2) that additional information is required to continue processing your application for environmental review. If you have any questions, please contact Mary Savela of our office at 235-2550. Sincerely, t. Donald K. Erickson, AICP Chief, Current Planning DKE/MBS:kc 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 Facsimile (206) 235-2513 CITA. OF RENTON Community Development Department Earl,Clymer, Mayor Kenneth E.Nyberg,Director April 9, 1990 Jay W. and Elizabeth Deeds 3607 Lake Washington Blvd. North Renton, WA 98056 Re: Request for two variances and shoreline exemption to build a single-family house adjacent to Lake Washington Location: 3607 Lake Washington Blvd. North Dear Mr. and Mrs. Deeds: Your application for two variances and a shoreline exemption to build a single-family house adjacent to Lake Washington was reviewed by Current Planning staff recently and some additional information is required before the application can be routed to other City departments for review and comment. The information required is as follows: 1. A vicinity map which shows all properties and land uses within a three hundred foot (300' ) radius of the subject property. The vicinity map that has been submitted is too small to show sufficient detail. 2 . A site plan that shows the footage of the front yard setback from the property line to the proposed new house. 3 . A neighborhood plan, to scale and with measurements of distances to lot lines, that shows all neighboring properties and the location and size of all houses and accessary buildings on those properties. When we receive the additional information referenced above, we will continue to process your application. If you have any questions, please telephone Mary Savela of my staff at 235-2550. • Sincerely, D• ald , 1, a. icks CP Chie , Cur ent Planning 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 :;:.....::......:..:»:.::...:.::.;:.;:.:....:.:.;:..:.::<.:.....: ... ....:i:...,,.;..:: ..::•:......:......:.:.;.,,.--..::v::::..:::..:"::.::::•::.::is.•::..."':w:.v:•:::i.....:....^;.^..�.......}'.... NOTE TO APPLICANT: Since this is a comprehensive application form, only those items related to your specific type of application(s) are to be completed. Please e print or type, and attach additional sheets if necessary. APPLICANT TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES NAME: -371rNi _•REZONE FROM ( TO ) $ SPECIAL PERMIT ADDRESS: _TEMPORARY PERMIT ��-1 `.-.v. kNip8N• _CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT SITE PLAN APPROVAL CITY: ZIP: SPECIAL PERMIT - GRADE&FILL IZ1TL.L Q4 fj`IO. CU.YDS:. ) r/•VARIANCE 4-104 LO 4 `(h,v) TELEPHONE NUMBER: (FROM SECTION:4.166(C)ilk Y Ei) ioE "LI ' _ROUTINE VEGETATION MANAGEMENT PERMIT CONTACT PERSON (*'JUSTIFICATION REQUIRED) NAME: SUBDIVISION: $ SHORT PLAT ADDRESS: _TENTATIVE PLAT rA1 - \atsrb%-• -��y.A W.. _PRELIMINARY PLAT FINAL PLAT CITY: ZIP: _•WAIVER 4YJL *(JUSTIFICATION REQUIRED) NO. OF LOTS: TELEPHONE NUMBER: PLAT NAME: -0 42t ( ) -cze.4' PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ OWNER PRELIMINARY NAME: _FINAL �k ( P.U.D. NAME: ADDRESS: . - M _BINDING SITE PLAN: $ CITY: ZIP: 5-8 o% MOBILE HOME PARKS: $ TELEPHONE NUMBER: TENTATIVE PRELIMINARY LOCATION FINAL PROPERTY ADDRESS: PARK NAME: Ir6J01 \j .. �,AS,µ,�`.41), NO. OF SPACES: EXISTING USE: CU6 riIL.- Si+M1611r t1.1 ZONING:1Z I _ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $ PROPOSED USE: TOTAL FEES: $ 14351D 774L- Sti ,6L1 �4M.LL1 AREA: SQ. FT. OF PROPERTY: PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON STAFF USE ONLY- - ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING APR 0 iRCI0 DATE RECEIVED: APPLICATION RECEIVED &DETERMINED TO BE: f1Ia%0I. 11VIL DATE ROUTED: _ACCEPTED,NOTIFICATION SENT: _INCOMPLETE,NOTIFICATION SENT: BY: • Jay W. 3607 Deeds Renton a WA ke 9g056 gton Blvd. Nor th Legal Description: Policy No, 446093 EXHIBIT ►►I,, PARCEL A The South 12 604 in Block „fleet of Lot 62 Seattle No. ' C. D. Hillman's, A11 of Lot Page 64� in 2' according Lake 63' and the t pageTOGE ER WITH King County, Washington; to the plat recorded Garden North 4 feet of Lot premises. gton slYinn ins of sthegse�on recorded in voume of Eden Addition of PARCEL B front of, adjacent class, or as conveyed by the f Plats' That butting upon saidtate at Portion way adjoining of the former Northern Eden Aa Lot 64, in Block uth 12 feet o Pacific Railw 11 o f pia tion to Seatt nAn� C. D. Lot 62, All of ay Company's Northerly Plats, page 64, in le No. 2, according Lake Lot 63 and the North of lying Wes and Southerly King Count ding to the WashingtonNorth 4 right angles, n terly of a line lines of said Washington,produced plat recorded aGarden of g les and in Washington ' from the parallel to Premises West lying between Volume EXCEPT East Line center line and 35 feet Easterly, the the Easterly Branch of s of the main Westerly, r1Y� and to y 10 said n t , me feet thereof for 1Woyd Company; of the Lake red at Purposes. of r a'4ypc APR ? 9 0 Jay W. Deeds 3607 Lake Washington Blvd. North Renton, WA 98056 • • Legal Description: Policy No. 446093 EXHIBIT "I" • PARCEL A The South 12 feet of Lot 62, All of Lot 63, and the North 4 feet of Lot 64 in Block "A", C. D. Hillman's .Lake Washington Garden of Eden Addition to Seattle No. 2, according to the plat recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, page 64, in King County, Washington; TOGETHER WITH shorelands of the second class, as conveyed by the State of Washington, lying in front of, adjacent to or abutting -upon said premises. PARCEL B That portion of the former Northern Pacific Railway Company's right of way adjoining the South 12 feet of Lot 62, All of Lot 63 and the North 4 feet of Lot 64, in Block "A", C. D. Hillman's Lake Washington Garden of Eden Addition to Seattle No. 2, according to the plat recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, page 64, in King County, Washington, and lying between the Northerly and Southerly lines of said premises produced Easterly, and lying Westerly of a line parallel to and 35 feet Westerly, measured at right angles, from the center line of the main track of the Lake Washington Belt Line Branch of said Railway Company; EXCEPT the Easterly 10 feet thereof for road purposes. Ip P i9619dR9C�®B�b4�s� ,oN �rY® ��Y19'P02 _I Jay W. Deeds 3607 Lake Washington Blvd. North I' Renton, WA 98056 Legal Description: NORTH PROPERTY LINE Legal Description of Boundary line per Superior Court Case No. 85-2-17170-5. Commencing at the monumented centerline of Southeast 86th Street (Griffith Avenue) and 104th Avenue Southeast (Hillman Boulevard) as shown on the Plat of "BUE'S VIEW ADDITION" as recorded in Volume 58 of Plats at page 46 and on the Plat of C.D. Hillman's 'LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN" Addition to Seattle No. 2 as recorded in Volume 11 of plats at page 64, records of King County Auditor, Washington; thence S 00° 00' 00" E along the centerline of 104th Avenue Southeast, 670. 60 Feet to a point on the East-West centerline of Section 32, Township 24 North, Range 5 East of the Willamette Meridian as shown on said LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN Plat; thence S 89° 23 ' 22" W, 1298.80 feet to the West one-quarter corner of said Section 32 ; thence continuing S 89° 23 ' 22" W, 62 .53 feet to a 3/4" iron pipe, said point is 35 feet Westerly, as measured perpendicular from the as-built centerline of the Northern Pacific Railway Company's railroad tracks as they existed on November 16, 1984 ; thence N 18° 17 ' 02" E parallel with and 35 feet Westerly of said railroad track centerline 108. 68 feet to a hub and tack, said point being 3 . 15 feet South of an existing power pole and the True Point of Beginning of the here in described line; thence S 89° 30 ' 57" W, 14.94 feet to a P-K nail set at the Southeast corner of a .6" high retaining wall; thence continuing S 89° 30 ' 57" W, 65.74 feet to a P-K nail set in the bulkhead on Lake Washington, said point is at the intersection of the bulkhead line to the south and the retaining wall to the east; thence S 88° 45 ' 34" W to the inner harbor line, and the terminus point of the line description. ,II . I prilAmssikG®abisiot� nra oat • r Jay W. Deeds 3607 Lake Washington Blvd. North Renton, WA 98056 Legal Description: SOUTH PROPERTY LINE Legal Description of Boundary line per Quit Claim Deed #E0806569 That portion of Lot 64 in Block "A" of C.D. Hillman's Lake Washington Garden of Eden Addition to Seattle No. 2, according to Plat recorded at Volume 11, page 64 in King County, Washington, lying North of the following line: Commencing at a brass monument marking the centerline intersection of North 38th Street and Park Avenue in the Northwest one-quarter of Section 32, Township 24 North, Range 5 East of the Willamette Meridian; thence South along said centerline, 670. 60 feet to the South line of said Northwest one-quarter; thence S 89° 23 ' 22" W, 1298.80 feet to the West one-quarter corner of said Section 32 ; thence continuing S 89° 23 ' 22" W, 25.54 feet to the as-built centerline of the Northern Pacific Railway Company Lake Washington belt line; thence continuing S 89° 23 ' 22 " W 36.99 feet to a point on the Westerly right-of-way line of said as-built railway, said point being 35.0 feet West of said as-built railway, thence N 18° 17 ' 02" E along said right-of-way line 70. 12 feet; thence N 89° 06 ' 04" W, 15.72 feet to a point which is 50. 00 feet West of said as-built railway centerline and the True Point of Beginning: thence N 89°06 ' 04" W, 60.30 Feet to an angle point in a concrete blockhead on Lake Washington and the Terminus Point of this line description. i o.; PIANNING.DOVMs oN PTX 9f.RENToN r? 0 9 too • . I Jay W. Deeds 3607 Lake Washington Blvd. North Renton, WA 98056 — �) — 11 • This sketch is not based upon a survey of the property described in Order No. 3 ) . i 0 I of Safeco Title Insurance Company of Washington. It is furnished without charge solely for the purpose of assisting in locating the said premises. It does not purport to show all roads or easements. The Com- pany assumes no liability for inaccuracies therein. -- - - - - — - -- , Q - - — — — M . / / ' 0. _ AO, / . a - - - - - - - - - - - � 'Ib - o . / / - -- - - - - - - 46 • / I ft. s - - - - - - - •---- 50 . // • �02 - - - - - - - - - m'r!� / _ • N rid es, ' / • Y�o — - — — — — -- 54 , . Effillr, / Ny ` — --- ®� 4. 1 8 \1/4\-----. 60 .',// . or — -- — — - --- , .S/. kcv VCIIll � N'AZ Raviss o 'i: .I M Aii-* 0 9 t; . t,. U CI ‘1• - --- - -------- -__ Jay W. Deeds „ 3607 Lake Washington Blvd. North '43 Renton, WA 98056 '', ..A , ATTACHMENT 1. LOT DETAILS AND EXISTING CONSTRUCTION I 4 , k taber '''' . . *,-.,,,..----,...,._. _ 6' FENCE 1. COVERED CARPORT / 2 0 /... ...:0 1 FIRST FLOOR LINE ' 1 z w z ROAD EASEMENT • Lu n M ,c 17) CO DECK cc cc ' .5 cp LL1 0 , 0 0 , 0 -J 0 U- U. .‘$ Z 0 0 0 0 Z Z C.) CM 01 -.- EXISTING HOUSE / i d / . • . , I I FENCE . C)C)( 1 INCH = 10 FEET N I or '', Jay W. Deeds 3607 Lake Washington Blvd. North Renton, WA 98056 Z2 :_; ATTACHMENT 2. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION : .,---z. , ` ° ' 'kik/ ; 041 - AI I FIRST FLOOR LINE in 2ND FLOOR LINE- i _Z0_. O Q 11 .. �0/i7v ROAD EASEMENT s J GARAGE p co '^ /$'0° co z o in PROPOSED HOUSE F . / , in (DO( S -r 1 INCH = 10 FEET I 'R f 5ME 0398Z • c'• CITY OF RENTON Building & Zoning Department (206). 235-2550 SHORELINE MASTER APPLICATION APPLICATION FOR: OFFICE USE ONLY: ' • Application No. : V-OSS- �L) I_I SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT ECF No. : PERMIT SEC-TWP-R: 31'2-9'—5 East- J. M . I CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - • • Date Approved: WO/ 2.411 VW) I VARIANCE Date Denied: Publication'Date: 17c EXEMPTION Comprehensive Plan: I REVISION Zoning: • • Water Bo'dy: • f•P,.•. .� j . STAFF USE ONLY -- ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING Date Received: Application Received By: Application Determined To Be: o Accepted o Incomplete Notification Sent On: By ( Initials) : Date Routed : Additional Material Received by: Application Determined To Be: o Accepted o `Incomplete Notification Sent On: By ( Initials) : In addition to the information below, the applicant should include a site map and any other pertinent information which will assist in the review of this. application: ' .- The Building- and• Zoning -Department reserves the right to require additional information .needed to evaluate the application. .. APPLICANT TO PROVIDE INFORMATION REQUIRED IN ITEMS 1-10 THROUGH 14-16 BELow: INFORMATION: 1. Applicant._. Owner ✓ Purchaser Name: \ia .-1�4-BCT'41 Lessee Other Mailing Address 3G0r) �--�• �A ►-���• IJ IRE"*L-rbm Phone: 2J11-04-2.1 a) 54A.. cco4+ib Cu..NA40 2. Name of Property Owner SA Mailing Phone: PLANNNGDv�inrAddress CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION 3 . Contact, RgNm Consultant : SE '. • APR 0 91990 Mailing ` Address Phonek.I=.L vE® PROJECT INFORMATION: 4 . General location or proposed project (give street address if any nearest street and intersection) 3c01 LK. �.AS-1-1 7st... t). ^1. 2eNA-rc J1 s05c.. ri 5 . Legal Description (if lengthy, attach as separate sheet) : A-n-A c V ' 6 . Name of adjacent water area or wetlands : L-A.Ksa V1 NIklfabO. 7. Current use of property and existing improvements : SI ..1(.,1_c 8 . PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY and proposed improvements (be specific) : sl►Sbl�.. -+��1�7 2�1 c� Minn ro17.._ ow►vQs?...3 9 . Proposed construction costs and schedule: A. Total construction cost and fair market value of proposed project include additional developments contemplated but not included in this application: (cX C�� B. Construction dates (month/year)Y ) for which permit is requested: Begin kU,.6 1.Z�0 End i n9I 10. List any other permits for this project from state, federal , local governmental agencies or the City of Renton for which you have applied or will apply, including the name of the issuing agency, whether the permit has been applied for, and if so, the date of the application, whether the application was approved or denied and the 11 date of same, and number of the application or permit: "b c1..m ta.1 "1,g;avMtT 1 2 en&CNl4L EC1ST/11/4!6 S'i R1.latt2£f -Zu.L`tb43 ,..lk, ]" - V VAR i A kk — Si.") 5 c 13 1 C - - 4-1 96 /TENS 11, 12,, AND 13 TO BE,CONPLETED BY LOCAL OFFICIAL: 11. NATURE OF THE EXISTING SHORELINE. (Describe type of shoreline, such as marine, stream, lake, lagoon, ,marsh, bog, swamp, flood plain, flbodway, delta; type of 'beah, suOh as accretion, erosion, high bank, 1'dw' bank, or dike; material, such as sand, gravel, mud, clay, rock, riprap; and extent and type of bulkheading, if any) : In the event that any of the proposed buildings or structures will .exceed a height of thirty-five (35) feet above the average grade e. level, indicate the approximate location of and number of residential units, existing and potential, that will have an obstructed view. 13 . If the application involves a conditional use or variance, set forth in full that portion of the master program which provides that the proposed use may be a conditional use, or, in the case of a variance, from which the variance is being sought. ITEMS I4, 15, AND 26 TO BE PROVIDED BY APPLICANT: 14 . If applying for a variance or a conditional use, complete the variance or conditional use form. 15 . Project Maps : Attach to application accurate site plan and vicinity maps . Refer to application instruction handout for map requirements . 16. Additional information (If necessary, attach as separate sheet) : STATE OF WASHINGTON SS CITY OF RENTON J I J. � , being duly sworn, certify that I am the above-named applicant for a permit to con- struct a substantial development pursuant to the Shoreline Management Act of 1971, and that the foregoing statements, answers, and information are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief . Sign e Subscribed and sworn to me this day of 4( lid otary Pu i in and f=c?t=the State ,-of Washington, residing a ~ :. FORM 177 //-°SS"--2.6' 1986Z 5/1/E SHORELINE APPLICATION NOTICE OF APPLICATION FOR SHORELINE MANAGEMENT SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT it Notice is hereby given that J A..\( has filed an application for a substantial development permit for the construction or development of ta= 4 S[n� t t— 1(7 i i ,) . iI located at: 3Qtr) 1,.�. w +.s4�1• L.va. NI. AB.I.-im&.1 ' wQ . J "within Section(s) 3Z of Township 74 N, Range 5 , W.M. , in the City of Renton, King County, Washington.' Said development is proposed to be within LAKS W,AStk-ikL6Zoki and/or its associated wetlands. Any person desiring to express his views or to be notified of the action taken on this application should notify the Building and Zoning Department, Renton Municipal Building, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, Washington 98055 in i . writing of his interest within thirty (30) days of the last publication of this notice. Publication dates of this notice are and PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF REN"TON City of Renton APR 0 �� 1990 Building and Zonigep rtrnentj 10-85 !i V- os5-- JAYE ' April 9, 1990 Jay W. and Elizabeth Deeds 3607 Lake Washington Blvd. North Renton, WA 98056 Re: Request for two variances and shoreline exemption to build a single-family house adjacent to Lake Washington Location: 3607 Lake Washington Blvd. North Dear Mr. and Mrs. Deeds: Your application for two variances and a shoreline exemption to build a single-family house adjacent to Lake Washington was reviewed by Current Planning staff recently and some additional information is required before the application can be routed to other City departments for review and comment. The information required is as follows: '4_. 1. A vicinity map which shows all properties and land uses within a three hundred foot (300') radius of the subject property. The vicinity map that has been submitted is too small to show sufficient detail. 2 . A site plan that shows the footage of the front yard setback from the property line to the proposed new house. i 3 . A neighborhood plan, to scale and with measurements of distances to lot lines, that shows all neighboring properties and the location and size of all j1 houses and accessary buildings on those properties. When we receive the additional information referenced above, we will continue to process your application. If you have any questions, please telephone Mary Savela of my staff at 235-2550. Sincerely, 1 Donald K. Erickson,__AICP PL.4NWING DBV.pSO4 Chief, Current Planning caY.QFRe ;qN. P�''riN a C2WQSl0N G171/of ReTQ . __ ttlj „ . , . ' I I , . 1 I . 1 . 1 • ! i 1 N 79 - TO 951 Or/ .. -,p_ i: FRO , / / A ”LI ezees ' A CODE I ..00 a: OF t 1131 . EXT. .17• 5., . . -:-; ,fift,, pripi , .40.6;;, -, E W.1)5d8 i // l.°11.6114-6.''rf 111L, "•111MEN.- Am i 0- malINIIII/Aprieirk / * •7;,C.:ifeffr-'-/-rip- gr.spium PHONED pk"..r.4/11 CALL LVI1 RETURNED 1--1 WANTS T r--7 WILL CALL 71 lairmil. ,A.. MCK 'FA.. ALL 1----1 SEE YOU° 1-1 AGAIN L.. L...j WAS IN 0 URGENT 0 , I I . • :;. , • ,.. . . , . . . . ' t CITY „ JF RENTON u ' - Community Development Department Earl,Clymer, Mayor Kenneth E.Nyberg,Director li April 9, 1990 Jay W. and Elizabeth Deeds 3607 Lake Washington Blvd. North Renton, WA 98056 Re: Request for two variances and shoreline exemption to build a single-family house adjacent to Lake Washington Location: 3607 Lake Washington Blvd. North Dear Mr. and Mrs. Deeds: Your application for two variances and a shoreline exemption to build a single-family house adjacent to Lake Washington was reviewed by Current Planning staff recently and some additional information is required before the application ' can be routed to other City departments for review and comment. The information required is as follows: 1. A vicinity map which shows all properties and land uses within a three hundred foot (300' ) radius of the subject property. The vicinity map that has been submitted is too small to show sufficient detail. 2 . A site plan that shows the footage of the front yard setback from the property line to the proposed new house. 3 . A neighborhood plan, to scale and with I� measurements of distances to lot lines, that shows all neighboring properties and the location and size of all houses and accessary buildings on those properties. When we receive the additional information referenced above, we will continue to process your application. If you have any questions, please telephone Mary Savela of my staff at 235-2550. Sincerely, D•. ald . sl icks. CP Chie , Cur ent Planning PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON APR 091EO il =4 V to 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 } 1/ 053''- 90 Jay W. Deeds 3607 Lake Washington Blvd. North Renton, WA 98056 This request is for a side yard setback of zero feet on the north property line 1. What condition of the subject property (i.e. , size, shape, topography, location or surroundings) NOT CREATED BY THE OWNER OR APPLICANT which have created the hardship and are the basis for granting a variance? The buildable area of the lot is approximately 2465 square feet. The remainder of the property is underwater. This lot is one of the narrowest in the neighborhood, as most lots are 40 feet or more in width. The buildable area is nearly a parallelogram of this shape and dimensions: 64' Lake Washington 35' 36' N 60' The buildable area is limited by Lake Washington on the west, and a roadway easement on the east. See Attachment 1 for lot details and existing construction. 2. How is the hardship a result of the application of the requirements of the Shoreline Act and Master Program? The Shoreline Act and Master Program does not accommodate lots having small , irregular shaped buildable areas, with the major portion of the lot under water. A house of reasonable size and proportion will not fit on this lot without variances to setback requirements. The proposed house has 862 square feet of living space and 400 square feet of garage on the first floor. The second floor has 936 square feet for a total of 1798 square feet of living space. See Attachment 2 for proposed construction. Compliance with the Shorelines Act and Master Program would not allow for the construction of this modest sized house. The existing house was built on the lot with zero to 2.5 feet side setbacks prior to annexation by the City of Renton and adoption of the Shoreline Act and Master Program. The lot was platted and easements establ ' hN@?s . ►o ' -1 :€ ^' annexation. � 7.091 CITY'OF RENTO PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTONN APE-,D„ 1c907 v 11 Jay W. Deeds 3607 Lake Washington Blvd. North Renton, WA 98056 Side Yard Setback Page 2 1 3. How is the variance incompatible with the general purpose and intent of the Shoreline Master Program? The setback requirement as required by the Shoreline Management Program does not allow for reasonable use of the property. This request is consistent with present construction. 4. Is the development proposed for the subject property similar to other developments which presently exist in the immediate area (and within the same shoreline environment designation), and if so, in what respect is it similar? In what respect (if any) does it differ? Give specific illustrations if possible. The proposed construction is consistent with existing conditions and utilization of the property. See Attachment 1 which shows present utilization of the lot. The carport north wall is currently on the north property line and the house is setback from 0.5 to 2.5 feet on the southern property line. The carport was erected in November 1988 following approval of variance V-538- 88 on October 26, 1988. As the carport has two enclosed sides, (the house to the south and the wall to the north) it is considered to be a garage. The north wall was constructed as a fire wall per variance requirements. The neighbor to the north has a deck attached to the house which has less than one foot setback from the common property line. See Attachment 3 for current side yard conditions. Two other variances for carport walls on side property lines have been issued to home owners in the neighborhood. Variance V-505-85 was approved for Mr. Riva at 3619 Lake Washington Blvd. No. , and variance V-534-88, was approved for Mr.Postma at 3825,Lake Washington Blvd. No. The Riva carport is also inclosed on two sides. See Attachment 4 for photographs of these two constructions. ,II The design of the proposed house will be similar and consistent with other permitted activities in the neighborhood. The proposed construction does not create an adverse effect to adjacent neighbors. The footprint of the proposed construction is less than the existing house, carport and elevated deck. AP W. 91290 Jay W. Deeds 3607 Lake Washington Blvd. North Renton, WA 98056 Side Yard Setback Page 3 5. How will the public welfare and interest be preserved? The proposed construction goes beyond preservation, it will enhance the public welfare and interests. The new construction will be built per code and therefore be safer, it will be more energy efficient, and certainly will be more pleasing to the eye. The closeness to the northern neighbor will remain the same on the first level but will be setback to the required five feet on the second level , see Attachment 2 for proposed construction. The proposed plan also allows for conforming to a five foot side yard setback from the southern property line. cnY of RE oN V 6 Jay W. Deeds 3607 Lake Washington Blvd. North Renton, WA 98056 LOT DETAILS AND EXISTING CONSTRUCTION I 6¢' 6'FENCE i---- • COVERED CARPORT O , FIRST FLOOR LINE 2 co WL . 3Q Y w z ROAD EASEMENT � 35' > > m DECK o cc O ' 36' ccc I l� o z Z z U N N EXISTING HOUSE - I 1 FENCE if.1 „. 6o' Mc 0011 4 ,r1: -4.3 E SIO_ �' �9 0 1 INCH = 10 FEET m I G6 8 2 ® Jay W. Deeds 3607 Lake Washington Blvd. North Renton, WA 98056 PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION (05-' FIRST FLOOR LINE 4 lc _ O 2ND FLOOR LINE 1 �� 5 o �2 1... 2 t 0 z h ROAD EASEMENT 5 GARAGE p Y 3.5 11, �5�0, i a S � L____ _ / 7' 36 ' I PROPOSED HOUSE i i 4 in 6o' 4 1 INCH = 10 FEET 1 ' r 1 I2 .:N:T`� . .................. .. ........ <.: :: : > >::;:�>< :::>. .;:<..:::pARTM�hiT.0�' CQMM��1T')�"Y:.DE�E�.O�'LVI�N.T.: ;:.; .: :.: .:. .: .::;. 1 :.; :::.: Tt`YT 'IGATZON Off:;-NATI TCA' iO T 4t At.:0-t1 p170P-kYZTY..b.W i:E S. . -::: : <<: :>:> «: :::>:: :>:= :; :>:::>::><:::> :: :;:<::::»: YVI TON:... . . ....................... ............................. . • *** FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY *** PROJECT TITLE: tee% 'S{lorc..t Yree, �)CuY'Np � f vo..Vlo.YYc.eS APPLICANT: cy ....t s . '. .. 1 : APPLICATION NUMBER: SME i V—oSS A.90 . tilling is a list of adjacent property owners and their addresses. A notification , ' c.,,'am �ofethe?ci, �pe.ding site plan application shall be sent to these individuals as prescribed by 1 y;: o ]Coion�Cit-y:code, Chapter 7'Section 38 of Title IV (Building Regulations) of Ordinance a >yo. 1628;rel4ting to site plan approval. . • ', °.NtiME v,.• . ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 334210-3010-pi 334270-0230-08 IGELMUND DARREL A E LINDA J470731 WIESMANN MICHAEL J+MICHELLE019999 . 3602 LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD N 3711 LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD N RENTON WA 98056 RENTON WA 9805 334270-0240-06 334270-0250-03 BURDICK JONATHAN R 8N9800 PROVOST. ALAN E 6099991 3711 LK WASHINGTON BLVD PO BOX 823 RENTON WA 98056 MERCER ISLAND WA 98040 , 334270-0260-01 334270-0270-09 i , PROVOST ALAN E 6N9999 ANDERSEN'LOUIS L 3707 LAKE. WASHINGTON BLVD 3703-LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD j RENTON WA 98056 RENTON WA. 98055 I 334270-0280-07 334270-0290-05 LYNN WILLIAM F 210090 BLACKLER CAROLYN M. 799999 3625 LK WASH BLVD N 3619 LAKE WASHI+NGTON BLVD N RENTON WA 98056 RENTON WA 98055 334270-0300-03 334270-0310-01 DENZER JAMES E 1N3863 JUHN YONG W & GIL 900313 3613 LK, WA BLVD N 3611 LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD N j RENTON WA • 98056 RENTON WA 93056 334270-0330-07 ` 334270-0355-07 RICHARDS DARIUS F' 953762 HASSON HELEN M 590002 18202 N. 44TH. AVE 3601 LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD N GLENDALE AZ 85308 RENTON. WA 98055 334270-0360-00 334270-0365-05 ' CONKLIN E S - RUPP CLETA 8N9999j 3608 LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD SE 3616 LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD N RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 980561 , 334270-0369-01 334270-0375-03 MALONE ANGELEEN D 379999 WALKER GORDON M 749999 3626 LK WA BLVD N 3701 WELLS AVE N RENTON WA 98056 RENTON WA 980561 a PLANNING DIVISION 322405-9005-05 - CITY OF RENTON NORTHERN PACIFIC RY CO 1 • • NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER • • ti 1 I • • • • • • II, I - T CERTIFICATION I, —1(k -/ 6� 7 , hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property owners and their addresses were taken from the records of the King County Assessor as prescribed by law. • •,,\'''ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington',residing at e, - - • 1. on -the-6 day of ( 70, • ff ,, \\ 1;� Signed: �/V CERTIFICATION FOR MAILING I, . ,�,r' hereby certify that notices of the public meeting on the subject site plan approval were mailed on `'y '2S !qv , to each listed • adjacent property owner as prescribed by law. • ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before 'I me, a Notary Public, in at d for the State of ' Washington jresiding -at on the day of �,,; i • 71,./ fir.. / tit Signed: . tl%uInsp, 1 Rev.0/84 tsV4 PRETj Aso� CE' •+0T2.doc ;tee, /tQ' �SsioN G�,•��•. :o *;� • • NOTARY �';- PUBLIC ooiy��•(. 9 199 ' �: o4, WASH�r� �N��� `� o,s'S 90 Sft PLANNING &ZONING FEES NAME: 'rpy peeps T �1 l PROJECT: 1i � D Y, tweeer+7(viiawe tom voc0 I, Annexation Fees 000/000/345.81.00.02 Appeals &Waivers 000/000/345.81.00.03 Binding Site Plan/Short Plat 000/000/345.81.00.04 Comprehensive Plan Amendment 000/000/345.81.00.05 Conditional Use Fees 000/000/345.81.00.06 Environmental Review Fees 000/000/345.81.00.07 Preliminary Plat 000/000/345.81.00.08 50% Final Plat (General Fund) 000/000/345.81.00.09 50% Final Plat (Park Fund) 101/00.0/345.81.00.00 • • Final/Preliminary P•UD 000/000/345.81.00.10 Grading & Filling Fees 000/000/345.81.00.11 Lot Line Adjustment 000/000/345.81.00.12 Mobile Home Parks 000/000/345.81.00.13 Rezone 000/000/345.81.00.14 Routine Vegetation Mgmt Fees 000/000/345.81.00.15 Shoreline Substantial Dev Fees 000/000/345.81.00.16 Site Plan Approval 000/000/345.81.00.17 Special/Temporary. Review Fees 000/000/345.81.00.18 Variance Fees 3 cip 3OO 000/0.00/345.81.00.19 700. 00 Other Misc Planning/Zoning Fees 000/000/345.81.00.20 • Maps • 000/000/341.50.00.00 7041 Photo Copies 000/000/341.60.00.24 Publications 000/000/341.60.00,24 Postage . Z. ® 1() 000/000/369.90.00.18 4/ 0#0 7055 Sales Tax 000/000/231.70.00.00 9998 ...................:::... BY: WV • DATE: if/CP /N A! .0 9 1290 1 .W s ,4,ek' i. , . it ; ' i` � 1 y , , t1.E7 Iii - J<?Y . , r k t , ,.. r ;'1 ' � , , .„ ;c ,• i `�9.ajugii„ I4,, , `.y ::6,,PO 1 lii;;:t jj'nf. UT-4I..4141;i:.1.1,=1:,I E.: PA,. 1. t-r; t • " , .:0f;1S_St 1 i13l,lICJ'„ tj._j„t31'.,411i,liS,li;9.:!2 ,. r: ;Cl} i;»ip11c�C;l 11 l.i�ril:Il.t:le.l 'f;, I., I, , ,.r r.. 1 ,1 1,QS i,.�(' 0.6 Sri;Zi) 1 f 1. I� �, ,i,'- � '1f1,lf_S'L'SOU;J„,SiSit„.h(.,`6,'S,i;;S�ilSoIH;!:1{t y ._.._ _ I 5L'.i LIV,_D 'fI i11°Iy, , i'., • 'tR.,' 'i t,:;l ,' t l'i (1' ' • I N Ol `. i ii , , PLANING DIVN Y L.1 'CITY OF stare-1 -Itp�1•'� iSli Tflf ''i ' i1 '�I '',L,,l _� ,i-'1•l- �� 0 ^-1q_,1 ,.'.Y4ni_i-S i, +..I, n`I(:i- A 9, Q9 ' • • 1 I d . U oss-Fo (.5711£/C3 le / �; `4s. , a`-L �`e ' FN.. `' t i 1.t :v,{ S,0 & 'f • (. v- 34.c.-7 Lv. U.),,,,s t.), Waal 0 .hi 1 Q. . , /-...o ...„, . - IS gala - l . i1. A i .4.e-r3• . kJ f e de N r...." (if t .. -.../e/.1,Q7 ri . /r 4, ,.- • • ---) ie Nrf ; 107 17-a .. Ir -', 7 I( i •.Z::::‘- 'n‘41- ).‘........ .., ,_ife.;0344), ')1,. i 0 0 ItiLa 'i.TE : Q---yast/.,0, / e .7,7,-7 -.. -..:.-----.' "..-...-------..'....' 7.1.,...::::::._ - • ... *-..'.- 1, ,7 36og i 10lZ 1- .N'31 i 0 j 121. :C:'- , I `-', ij 1904- Le, 1„,,,,,4_ loctf. .5%,:in... la ,o D f 4, , . • 4':71, / "s.4,1-..4 A. 3 9 9"5 1 e-�7 v lI U f . /rill' :: A - 3'JaZ c2., /Y ' APR, 0 9`1990 _ - i _ _ _ I . Jay W. Deeds 3607 Lake Washington Blvd. North Renton, WA 98056 PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ��Iin FIRST FLOOR LINE QI Z 1 l 2ND FLOOR LINE 1 41 _co �o ROAD EASEMENT j GARAGE 2 ill JI W 15 or N L ._ /5-----7.. . / o / PROPOSED HOUSE / a. / / _ ....._ rC., 0 moo CcD( �� Z z 1 INCH = 10 FEET cz _ l'i I "}) O - 22U-16 • .271 FLAMM DMON GITY OF RENTON APR 0 9 19 safriwL-063--fe ;(7. ,,, ,c—, f...; _ _. t„,___ / • -. ,-, '77— ILI c'' i h 1#114 • • aENTON >. cn Ail?, tLi LLI ‹ ,iel a //Win) i k5, ) 1 (1qc X --7-77- 444,... - 4: 0 „ l' ,tmnptit ' ss- s207E CIT'i OF RENTON "LL `h`' Community Development Department Earl,Clymer, Mayor Kenneth E.Nyberg,Director April 9, 1990 Jay W. and Elizabeth Deeds 3607 Lake Washington Blvd. North Renton, WA 98056 Re: Request for two variances and shoreline exemption to build a single-family house adjacent to Lake Washington Location: 3607 Lake Washington Blvd. North Dear Mr. and Mrs. Deeds: Your application for two variances and a shoreline exemption to build a single-family house adjacent to Lake Washington , was revieweth.by Current Planning staff recently and some additional information is required before the application can be routed to other City departments for review and comment. The information required is as follows: • 1. A vicinity map which shows ,all properties and land uses within a three hundred foot (300' ) radius of the // 00('' subject property. The vicinity map that has been J submitted is too small to show sufficient detail. 2 . A site plan that shows the footage of the front yard setback from the property line to the proposed new house. 3 . A neighborhood plan, to scale and with measurements of distances to lot lines, that shows all neighboring properties and the location and size of all houses and accessary buildings on those properties. When we receive the additional information referenced above, we will continue to process your application. If you have any questions, please telephone Mary Savela of my staff at 235-2550. Sincerely, D. ald .) /, m icks. CP Chie , Cur ent Planning PLANNING DIVISVOW KAMM MVO APR 0 -9. 1990 *ECTIEf,,,,41 go 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055