Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
RES 4568
ϭ /dzK&Z EdKE͕t^,/E'dKE Z ^K>hd/KEEK͘____ Z ^K>hd/KE K& d, /dz K& Z EdKE͕ t^,/E'dKE͕ KWd/E' z Z & Z E d, hZZ EdW/d>&/>/d/ ^W>E^&KZ< Ed͕/^^Yh,͕E Z EdKE ^,KK> /^dZ/d^͕ E hZZ Ed W/d> &/>/d/ ^ W>E &KZ Z EdKEZ '/KE>&/Z hd,KZ/dz͖ED E/E'd, ϮϬϮϱͲϮϬϮϲ/dzK& Z EdKE& ^, h> ͘ t, Z ^͕ŽŶEŽǀĞŵďĞƌϮϯ͕ϮϬϬϵ͕ƚŚĞŽƵŶĐŝůĂĚŽƉƚĞĚKƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞEŽ͘ϱϱϬϵ͕ ǁŚŝĐŚƌĞŵŽǀĞĚŵĂŶLJĨĞĞƐĨƌŽŵƚŚĞZĞŶƚŽŶDƵŶŝĐŝƉĂůŽĚĞ;͞ZD͟ͿĂŶĚĐŽŶƐŽůŝĚĂƚĞĚ ƚŚĞŵŝŶƚŽƚŚĞϮϬϭϬŝƚLJŽĨZĞŶƚŽŶ&ĞĞ^ĐŚĞĚƵůĞďƌŽĐŚƵƌĞ͕ǁŚŝĐŚŚĂƐďĞĞŶƐƵďƐĞƋƵĞŶƚůLJ ĂŵĞŶĚĞĚ͖ĂŶĚ t, Z ^͕ŽŶEŽǀĞŵďĞƌϭϴ͕ϮϬϮϰ͕ƚŚĞŝƚLJŽƵŶĐŝůƉĂƐƐĞĚKƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞEŽ͘ϲϭϰϳ͕ ĂĚŽƉƚŝŶŐĂŶĂŵĞŶĚĞĚĨĞĞƐĐŚĞĚƵůĞĨŽƌϮϬϮϱĂŶĚϮϬϮϲ͖ĂŶĚ t, Z ^͕ ŽŶ DĂLJ ϱ͕ ϮϬϮϱ ƚŚĞ ĨĞĞ ƐĐŚĞĚƵůĞ ĨŽƌ ϮϬϮϱ ĂŶĚ ϮϬϮϲ ǁĂƐ ƐƵďƐĞƋƵĞŶƚůLJ ĂŵĞŶĚĞĚďLJKƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞEŽ͘ϲϭϱϴ͖ĂŶĚ t, Z ^͕ŝƚŝƐŶĞĐĞƐƐĂƌLJƚŽĂƉƉƌŽǀĞĂŶĂŵĞŶĚĞĚĨĞĞƐĐŚĞĚƵůĞƚŽŵĂŬĞƉĞƌŝŽĚŝĐ ƵƉĚĂƚĞƐĂƐƉĂƌƚŽĨƚŚĞŝƚLJ͛ƐDŝĚͲŝĞŶŶŝĂůƵĚŐĞƚĂŵĞŶĚŵĞŶƚ͖ĂŶĚ t, Z ^͕ƵŶĚĞƌ ZD^ĞĐƚŝŽŶ ϰͲϭͲϭϵϬ͕ƚŚĞ ŝƚLJ ŽĨ ZĞŶƚŽŶŚĂƐŚĞƌĞƚŽĨŽƌĞ ĐŽůůĞĐƚĞĚ ƐĐŚŽŽůŝŵƉĂĐƚĨĞĞƐŽŶďĞŚĂůĨŽĨƚŚĞ<ĞŶƚ͕/ƐƐĂƋƵĂŚ͕ĂŶĚZĞŶƚŽŶ^ĐŚŽŽůŝƐƚƌŝĐƚƐ͕ĂŶĚĐŽůůĞĐƚĞĚ ĨŝƌĞŝŵƉĂĐƚŝŵƉĂĐƚƐŽŶďĞŚĂůĨŽĨƚŚĞZĞŶƚŽŶZĞŐŝŽŶĂů&ŝƌĞƵƚŚŽƌŝƚLJ;͞ZZ&͟Ϳ͖ĂŶĚ t, Z ^͕ ƚŚĞ <ĞŶƚ͕ /ƐƐĂƋƵĂŚ͕ ĂŶĚ ZĞŶƚŽŶ ^ĐŚŽŽů ŝƐƚƌŝĐƚƐ͕ ĂŶĚ ZZ& ĞĂĐŚŚĂǀĞ ƌĞƋƵĞƐƚĞĚƚŚĂƚƚŚĞŝƚLJŽĨZĞŶƚŽŶĂĚŽƉƚƚŚĞŝƐƚƌŝĐƚ͛ƐĂŶĚZZ&͛ƐĐƵƌƌĞŶƚĂƉŝƚĂů&ĂĐŝůŝƚŝĞƐWůĂŶƐ͕ ƌĞŵŽǀĞƚŚĞƐĐŚŽŽůŝŵƉĂĐƚĨĞĞƐĂƐĞƐƚĂďůŝƐŚĞĚŝŶƚŚĞŝƐƚƌŝĐƚ͛ƐĂƉŝƚĂů&ĂĐŝůŝƚŝĞƐWůĂŶƐ͕ĂŶĚĂĚũƵƐƚ ƚŚĞĨŝƌĞŝŵƉĂĐƚĨĞĞƐĂƐĞƐƚĂďůŝƐŚĞĚŝŶƚŚĞZZ&͛ƐĂƉŝƚĂů&ĂĐŝůŝƚŝĞƐWůĂŶ͖ĂŶĚ 4568 Ϯ Z ^K>hd/KEEK͘_____ t, Z ^͕ŝƚŝƐĨƵƌƚŚĞƌŶĞĐĞƐƐĂƌLJƚŽĂƉƉƌŽǀĞĂŶĂŵĞŶĚĞĚĨĞĞƐĐŚĞĚƵůĞƚŽĂŵĞŶĚƚŚĞ ŝŵƉĂĐƚĨĞĞƐĨŽƌ<ĞŶƚ͕/ƐƐĂƋƵĂŚ͕ĂŶĚZĞŶƚŽŶ^ĐŚŽŽůŝƐƚƌŝĐƚƐ͕ĂŶĚƚŽĞdžƚĞŶĚƚŚĞĞdžŝƐƚŝŶŐĂƉƉůŝĐĂďůĞ &ŝƌĞ/ŵƉĂĐƚ&ĞĞƐĂŶĚ&ŝƌĞDĂƌƐŚĂůWůĂŶZĞǀŝĞǁĂŶĚ/ŶƐƉĞĐƚŝŽŶ&ĞĞƐ͕ƉƵƌƐƵĂŶƚƚŽŝƚLJŽƵŶĐŝů͛Ɛ ĂƉƉƌŽǀĂůŽŶEŽǀĞŵďĞƌϭϴ͕ϮϬϮϰ͕ƵŶĚĞƌ/ŵƉĂĐƚ&ĞĞƐŝŶ^ĞĐƚŝŽŶy//ĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ&ĞĞƐĂŶĚ&ŝƌĞ DĂƌƐŚĂů&ĞĞƐƵŶĚĞƌ^ĞĐƚŝŽŶy///&ŝƌĞĞƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚ&ŝƌĞDĂƌƐŚĂů&ĞĞƐŽĨƚŚĞĨĞĞƐĐŚĞĚƵůĞ͖ EKt͕d, Z &KZ ͕ d, /dzKhE/>K&d, /dz K&Z EdKE͕ t^,/E'dKE͕K Z ^K>s ^&K>>Kt^͗ ^ d/KE/͘dŚĞĨĞĞƐĐŚĞĚƵůĞŝƐĂŵĞŶĚĞĚĂŶĚƌĞƉůĂĐĞĚǁŝƚŚƚŚĞϮϬϮϱͲϮϬϮϲŝƚLJŽĨZĞŶƚŽŶ &ĞĞ^ĐŚĞĚƵůĞďƌŽĐŚƵƌĞ͕ǁŚŝĐŚŝƐĂƚƚĂĐŚĞĚŚĞƌĞƚŽĂŶĚĂĚŽƉƚĞĚďLJƚŚŝƐƌĞĨĞƌĞŶĐĞ;͞&ĞĞ^ĐŚĞĚƵůĞ͟Ϳ͘ ŶƵƉĚĂƚĞĚĐŽƉLJŽĨƚŚĞ&ĞĞ^ĐŚĞĚƵůĞƐŚĂůůĂƚĂůůƚŝŵĞƐďĞĨŝůĞĚǁŝƚŚƚŚĞŝƚLJůĞƌŬĂƐƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚďLJ KƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞEŽ͘ϱϱϬϵ͘ ^ d/KE//͘dŚĞŝƚLJŽƵŶĐŝůŚĞƌĞďLJĂĚŽƉƚƐďLJƌĞĨĞƌĞŶĐĞĂƐŝĨĨƵůůLJƐĞƚĨŽƌƚŚŚĞƌĞŝŶƚŚĞ ĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐĂƉŝƚĂů&ĂĐŝůŝƚŝĞƐWůĂŶƐ͗ ͘ dŚĞ<ĞŶƚ^ĐŚŽŽůŝƐƚƌŝĐƚ^ŝdžͲzĞĂƌĂƉŝƚĂů&ĂĐŝůŝƚŝĞƐWůĂŶϮϬϮϰͲϮϬϮϱƚŚƌŽƵŐŚϮϬϯϬͲϮϬϯϭ͕ ĚĂƚĞĚ:ƵŶĞϮϬϮϱ͕ĂƚƚĂĐŚĞĚĂƐ džŚŝďŝƚ͖ĂŶĚ ͘ dŚĞϮϬϮϱĂƉŝƚĂů&ĂĐŝůŝƚŝĞƐWůĂŶŽĨ/ƐƐĂƋƵĂŚ^ĐŚŽŽůŝƐƚƌŝĐƚEŽ͘ϰϭϭ͕ĚĂƚĞĚ:ƵŶĞϮϬϮϱ͕ ĂƚƚĂĐŚĞĚĂƐ džŚŝďŝƚ͖ĂŶĚ ͘ dŚĞϮϬϮϱĂƉŝƚĂů&ĂĐŝůŝƚŝĞƐWůĂŶŽĨZĞŶƚŽŶ^ĐŚŽŽůŝƐƚƌŝĐƚEŽ͘ϰϬϯ͕ĚĂƚĞĚ:ƵŶĞϮϬϮϱ͕ ĂƚƚĂĐŚĞĚĂƐ džŚŝďŝƚ͖ĂŶĚ ͘dŚĞZĞŶƚŽŶZĞŐŝŽŶĂů&ŝƌĞƵƚŚŽƌŝƚLJϮϬϮϲZĂƚĞ^ĐŚĞĚƵůĞ͕ĂƉŝƚĂů&ĂĐŝůŝƚŝĞƐWůĂŶ͕ĂŶĚZĂƚĞ ^ƚƵĚLJĨŽƌ&ŝƌĞ/ŵƉĂĐƚ&ĞĞƐ͕ĚĂƚĞĚƵŐƵƐƚϮϬϮϱ͕ĚĂƚĞĚƵŐƵƐƚϮϬϮϱ͕ĂƚƚĂĐŚĞĚĂƐ džŚŝďŝƚ ͘ 4568 City of Renton Fee Schedule 2025-2026 Rev. September 2025 2025-2026 City of Renton Fee Schedule Exhibit A City of Renton Fee Schedule 2025-2026 Table of Contents Page SECTION I. MISCELLANEOUS FEES 1 SECTION II. MAPLEWOOD GOLF COURSE 2 SECTION III. CITY CENTER PARKING FEES 2 SECTION IV. AQUATIC FEES 3 SECTION V. CARCO THEATER (REPEALED) 3 SECTION VI. PARKS AND FACILITIES USE AND RENTAL 3 SECTION VII. COMMUNITY CENTER PASS CARD & FEES 4 SECTION VIII. AIRPORT CHARGES 4 SECTION IX. ANIMAL LICENSES FEES - RMC 5-4-2 4 SECTION X. BUSINESS LICENSES 5 SECTION XI. ADULT ENTERTAINMENT LICENSES 5 SECTION XII. DEVELOPMENT FEES 6 Building Fees:6 Land Use Review Fees:8 Site Work, Utilities, and Right of Way Fees: 10 Technology Surcharge Fee 14 Impact Fees: 14 Miscellaneous Fees: 15 SECTION XIII. FIRE DEPARMENT FIRE MARSHAL FEES (RFA) 15 17SECTION XIV. MONETARY PENALTY SCHEDULE FOR INFRACTIONS ISSUED UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF CHAPTER 7.80 RCW City of Renton Fee Schedule 2025-2026 SECTION I. MISCELLANEOUS FEES*2025 2026 1. Maps: a.$4 $4 b. $12 $12 c. $4 $4 d. $12 $12 e. $5 $5 2. Plat: a. $2 $2 b. $1 $1 3. Photocopies: a. $0.15 $0.15 b. $0.20 $0.20 c. $0.25 $0.25 4. Budget: a. $10 $10 b. N/C N/C 5. Audio or Video Recording Copies: a.$2 $2 b.$2 $2 6. Regulations and Plans: a.Comprehensive Plan and Map $30 $30 b.Title IV, Development Regulations: (i) Text and Zoning Map $110 $110 (ii) Text only $100 $100 c.Individual Chapters of Development Regulations $10 $10 d. Renton Municipal Code (two volumes)$400 $400 e.Code Supplements, per year: (i) Titles I - III and VI - X $70 $70 (ii) Title IV $70 $70 7. Miscellaneous Services: a.Certification and Notary Fees - Clerk's Certification $10 $10 b.Notary Public Attestation or Acknowledgement or as $10 $10 otherwise provided for in RCW 42.28.090, per signature c.Hold Harmless Agreements and other similar documents $20 $20 not otherwise provided for d.Lamination of licenses, pictures $6 $6 e.Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) Loan Program: (i) Application Fee $200 $200 (ii) Loan Origination Fee $150 or 0.25% of loan amount, whichever is greater $150 or 0.25% of loan amount, whichever is greater (iii) Closing Costs (including any legal fees)50% of total actual costs 50% of total actual costs 8. Miscellaneous Charges for Police Services: a.Police Reports per page $0.15 $0.15 b.Record Checks (Written Response) $5 $5 c.Photographs - Digital on CD $2 $2 d.Photographs - black & white or color - Cost of developing film Cost Cost e.Fingerprint Cards $5 $5 (i) Each additional card $1 $1 9. Charges for Fire Documents: a.Fire reports per page $0.15 $0.15 b.Fire investigative report on CD $2 $2 c.First copy - black & white or color - Cost of developing film Cost Cost d.Additional copy - black & white or color - Cost of developing film Cost Cost 10. Computer Listings: a.City of Renton new business list $10 $10 b.List of all business licenses $20 $20 c.Copies requested to be faxed, local number $3 $3 d.Copies requested to be faxed, long distance number (i) Multi-family: 2 units, Duplexes, & Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) 1 $10 $10 (ii) Six (6) or more pages (ten (10) page limit)$20 $20 11. Utility Fee: a.Special Request Water Meter Reading $30 $30 b.Utility New Account Setup $25 $25 c.Utility Billing Account Transfer (tenant billing form)$5 $5 d.Water utility outstanding balance search requested by $25 $25 fax, messenger, or letter e Water turn off and turn on fee $60 $60 f Water utility shutoff list processing fee $60 $60 g Water delinquent late fee of 10% of past due charges but not less than fifty cents 10% 10% h Water after hours service charge to turn on water after 3 p.m. (additional fee)$90 $90 i Tenant notification fee for impending shutoff of water per tenant $5 $5 j Petition filing fee for stormwater appeal from category determination and assessment $75 $75 k Meter Accuracy Reading - For testing 3/4" through 2" meter $40 $40 l Meter Accuracy Reading - For testing meters larger than 2"Time & Materials, requires Time & Materials, requires a $60 refundable deposit a $60 refundable deposit prior to test prior to test 12. Schedule of Fines for False Alarms - Security/Burglar: (effective February 1, 2019) a.$25 $25 b.N/C N/C c.N/C N/C d.$100 $100 e.$250 $250 f.$25 $25 g.$50 $50 1 A registration year shall mean January 1 thru December 31 each year. 13. NSF Check Fees $25 $25 14. Veteran Park Tile: Three lines $75 $75 Late Payment Fee Unregistered Alarm System Fee First False Alarm in a registration year1 One-time Registration Fee Annual Registration Renewal Second False Alarm in a registration year1 Third or more False Alarm in a registration year1 Audio recording, each copy Video recording, each copy City's Budget to other municipality or quasi-municipal corporation or other nonprofit charitable or education organization City's Budget Zoning maps - standard 11 x 17 Zoning maps - large 24 x 36 Comprehensive Plan map - standard 11 x 17 Comprehensive Plan map - large 24 x 36 Precinct maps First page Each additional page Each 8.5" x 11" or 8.5" x 14" Each 11" x 17" Each 8.5" x 11" or 8.5" x 14" color 1 City of Renton Fee Schedule 2025-2026 SECTION I. MISCELLANEOUS FEES* (CONTINUED)2025 2026 15. Electronic Records 1,2,3: a.Photocopies or printed copies of electronic records, per page $0.15 $0.15 b.Scanning paper records, per page $0.10 $0.10 c.$0.05 $0.05 d.$0.10 $0.10 e.Body worn camera footage redaction, per minute of documented staff time, plus other documented costs of redaction $0.64 $0.64 16. Document Recording Fees: a.Actual Costs Actual Costs b.Actual Costs Actual Costs 17. Publication Fees: Actual Costs Actual Costs SECTION II. MAPLEWOOD GOLF COURSE 2025 2026 1. a.Weekday: (i) 18 Hole $48 $50 $52 (ii) 9 Hole $35 $37 $40 (iii) 18 Hole, Senior $40 $42 $45 (iv) 9 Hole, Senior $30 $32 $35 (v) 18 Hole, Junior $26 $28 (vi) 9 Hole, Junior $20 $22 b.Weekend: (i) 18 Hole $55 $60 $62 (ii) 9 Hole $40 $42 $45 2. Club Rental: a.Regular $35 $35 b.Premium $65 $65 3. Golf Cart Fees: a.18 Hole $38 $40 b.18 Hole Single Rider $28 $30 c.9 Hole $26 $28 d.9 Hole Single Rider $18 $20 e.Trail Fee $20 $20 f.Half Cart, 18 Hole $19 $20 g.Half Cart, 9 Hole $13 $14 4. Driving Range Fees: a.Large Bucket $14 $15 b.Small Bucket $11 $12 c.Warm-up Bucket $7 $7 5. Lesson Fees: a.1/2 Hour Private $60 $65 b.1 Hour Private $90 $95 c.1/2 Hour Series Private $220 $230 d.1 Hour Series Private $330 $340 e.Group Series $160 $180 f.1/2 Hour Private, Junior $40 $45 g.Playing Lesson(3-hole minimum/9-hole maximum) per hole $30 $35 SECTION III. CITY CENTER PARKING FEES 2025 2026 1. City Center Parking Garage Fees 1: Parking rates for retail parking will be as follows: a.Zero (0) - two (2) hours N/C N/C b.Two (2) - four (4) hours $2 $2 c.Four (4) - six (6) hours $4 $4 d.Six (6) - (10) hours $6 $6 e. 10 hours or more $10 $10 f.Monthly pass-holders, tax included $35 $35 1 1 The charges identified in RCW 42.56.120(3)(b) (and referenced above) may be combined to the extent that more than one type of charge applies to copies produced in response to a particular request. The actual cost of any digital storage media or device provided by the agency. Alternatively, the City may charge a flat fee of up to $2 for the entire request as long as the cost of uploading and transmitting the electronic records is reasonably estimated to equal or exceed that amount. Only one $2 flat fee per request is authorized for electronic records produced in installments. When records are provided electronically on a CD, DVD, thumb drive, flash drive, or other electronic device, the requestor will be charged for the cost of the electronic storage device. The City may charge an actual-cost service charge for requests that require use of IT expertise to prepare data compilations or provide customized electronic access services when not used by the City for other purposes. A cost estimate and explanation will be provided to the requestor before incurring the costs. 2 Option to waive charges. The City may waive charges associated with fulfilling a request. The decision will be based on various factors, including the volume and format of the responsive documents. The decision to assess fees for fulfilling a public records request shall be made on a consistent and equitable basis, dependent primarily upon the amount of staff time required for copying, scanning, shipping, uploading, and/or transmitting the records associated with fulfilling a request. 3 Certified copies. If the requestor is seeking a certified copy of a City record, an additional charge of $1.00 per each complete document may be applied to cover the additional expense and time required for certification. *Should Section I fees due total less than $4.00 and no other fee is due to the City at the same time, the department administrator may authorize to waive the entire amount due at their discretion. For purposes of this section, "weekend" shall mean Friday, Saturday, and Sunday. "Weekday" shall mean the remaining four days of the week. "Junior" shall mean ages 17 and under, "Senior" shall mean ages 62 and over. Green Fees: Parking garage fees for periods of up to 10 hours are waived by Ord 6139 until 12/31/2025. Transmission of records in an electronic format or for the use of agency equipment to send the records electronically, per gigabyte (GB) Electronic files or attachments uploaded for electronic delivery (email, cloud-based data storage service, or other means of electronic delivery), for each four (4) files The applicant shall pay all document recording fees charged by King county and all administrative fees charged by the title company for processing. Payment in full shall by submitted to the City before documents are sent for recording. Off-season and promotional rates determined by management; posted on website. The applicant shall pay all Publication fees charged by publication outlet used by the City (The Seattle Times or equivalent). Payment in full shall be made to the City prior to public hearing, permit approval or issuance, whichever comes first. Miscellaneous charges associated with document recording, such as courier fees 2 City of Renton Fee Schedule 2025-2026 SECTION IV. AQUATIC FEES 2025 2026 1. Admission for the Aquatic Center shall be as follows: a.Regular Session: (i) Infants - under 1 year N/C N/C (ii) Youth - 1 to 4 years $8 $8 (iii) Ages 5 and up $16 $16 (iv) Lap swim - water walking only $7 $7 (v) Locker Rental $0.25 $0.25 b.Canopy Rental Fees1: (includes canopy and admission for one leisure swim session): (i) Henry Moses Party Tent #1 (10' x 20' for up to twenty-five (25) guests on wave pool): (1) Resident Rate, per session $600 $600 (2) Non-resident Rate, per session $700 $700 (ii) Henry Moses Party Tent #2 (10' x 20' for up to twenty-five (25) guests): (1) Resident Rate $500 $500 (2) Non-Resident Rate $600 $600 (iii) Henry Moses Party Tent #3 (10' x 10' for up to ten (10) guests): (1) Resident Rate, per session $250 $250 (2) Non-resident Rate, per session $300 $300 c.Resident Rate all inclusive1 $3,800 $3,800 d.Non-resident Rate all inclusive1 $4,800 $4,800 e.Swim Lesson Program: Fees and associated descriptions are published in the "Let's Go Renton " Renton Activities Guide f.End-of-year School Party Rentals: (i) Renton School District (1) 001 - 299 students $1,900 $1,900 (2) 300 - 399 students $2,250 $2,250 (3) 400 - 499 students $2,400 $2,400 (4) 500 - 599 students $2,550 $2,550 (ii) Other Schools and Districts (1) 001 - 299 students $2,450 $2,450 (2) 300 - 399 students $2,850 $2,850 (3) 400 - 499 students $3,150 $3,150 (4) 500 - 599 students $3,360 $3,360 1 Sales tax not included in the rental fee 2. Boat Launch Rates: a.Daily resident - 7 days a week $20 $20 b.Daily Non-resident - 7 days a week $25 $25 c.Overnight resident - 7 days a week $25 $25 d.Overnight Non-resident - 7 days a week $45 $45 e.Annual parking boat launch permit - resident $70 $70 f.Annual parking boat launch permit - non-resident $130 $130 g. (i) $110 $110 (ii) $115 $115 SECTION V. CARCO THEATER (REPEALED)2025 2026 SECTION VI. PARKS AND FACILITIES USE AND RENTAL 2025 2026 1. Outlying Picnic Shelters (Cedar River Trail, Liberty Park, Philip Arnold Park, Teasdale Park and Heritage Park) Maximum of 50 people: a.Resident 10am-7pm $150 $150 b.Non-resident 10am-7pm $290 $290 c.Refundable Security and Damage deposit $100 $100 2. Gene Coulon Beach Park Shelters (South #1, South #2 and Creekside) Maximum of 75 people: a.Resident 10am-7pm $150 $150 b.Non-resident 10am-7pm $290 $290 e.South Shelters 1 & 2 Resident rate $310 $310 f.South Shelters 1 & 2 Non-resident rate $610 $610 g.Refundable Security and Damage deposit $100 $100 3. Gene Coulon Beach Park Shelters (North Shelter): a.Resident 10am-7pm $200 $200 b.Non-resident 10am-7pm $360 $360 c.Refundable Security and Damage deposit $100 $100 4. Basketball court rate per hour (Tournament Play Only): a.Resident rate $25 $25 b.Non-resident rate $30 $30 c $750 $750 5. a.Resident rate per hour $25 $25 b.Non-resident rate per hour $30 $30 c.Temporary Event Permit Fee $85 $85 d.Refundable Security and Damage deposit $750 $750 6. Piazza Park Open Space Event Rental a.Full day rental 10am - 7pm $500 $500 b.Refundable Security and Damage deposit $750 $750 7. Photo Shoots per hour: a.Commercial Film and Photo Shoots per hour $300 $300 8. Electrical Spider Box rental: a. Electrical spider box rental per box, per event, with special event approval $200 $200 Open Space Area in the Parks (Cascade, Teasdale, Philip Arnold, Cedar River, Earlington, Gene Coulon, Glencoe, Kennydale Lions, Sunset, and Riverview Parks): Fishing Tournaments at Coulon Beach (additional rental fee if using the Pavilion area for weigh in and or electricity at the current rental rate) per event Resident rate Non-resident rate Refundable Security and Damage deposit 3 City of Renton Fee Schedule 2025-2026 SECTION VI. PARKS AND FACILITIES USE AND RENTAL (CONTINUED)2025 2026 9. Athletic Field Rental, Lights and Prep Fees: a.Sports field rental per hour - resident $30 $30 b.Sports field rental per hour - non-resident $36 $36 c.Renton Area Youth Sports Agencies, per hour $8 $8 d.Field prep for softball/baseball - resident per occurrence $35 $35 e.Field prep for soccer - resident per occurrence $50 $50 f.Custom Field prep - resident per occurrence $100 $100 g.Field prep for softball/baseball - non-resident per occurrence $40 $40 h.Field prep for soccer - non-resident per occurrence $55 $55 i.Custom Field prep - non-resident per occurrence $100 $100 j.Field lights all sports - resident per hour $30 $30 k.Field lights all sports - non-resident per hour $36 $36 l.Refundable Security and Damage deposit $750 $750 10. Banquet & Classroom Rental - Community Center & Senior Activity Center: a.Friday evening 5 hour minimum - resident $750 $750 b.Weekend Rates 10 hour minimum - resident $1,500 $1,500 c.Extra hours - per hour - resident $150 $150 d.Friday 5 hour minimum - non-resident $900 $900 e.Weekend Rates 10 hour minimum - non-resident $1,800 $1,800 f.Extra hours - per hour - non-resident $180 $180 g Banquet Room - Mon - Fri - daytime - resident/hr 3 hour min $100 $100 h Banquet Room - Mon - Fri - daytime - non-resident/hr 3 hour min $120 $120 i.Refundable Security and Damage deposit $750 $750 j.Cancellation Fee - Less than 90 days $550 $550 11. Classroom and Gymnasium Rental - Renton Community Center: a.Resident single gym athletic - per hour $50 $50 b.Non-resident single gym athletic - per hour $60 $60 c.Resident double gym athletic - per hour $100 $100 d.Non-resident double gym athletic - per hour $120 $120 e.Resident single gym non-athletic $1,000 $1,000 f.Non-resident single gym non-athletic $1,200 $1,200 g.Resident double gym non-athletic $2,000 $2,000 h.Non-resident double gym non-athletic $2,400 $2,400 i.Carpet fee single gym - resident & non-resident $325 $325 j.Carpet fee double gym - resident & non-resident $650 $650 k.Classroom resident $40 $40 l.Classroom Non-resident $48 $48 12. Facility Rental - Neighborhood Center: a.Meeting room - resident $40 $40 b.Gymnasium - resident $40 $40 c.Meeting room - non-resident $48 $48 d.Gymnasium - non-resident $48 $48 e.Refundable Security and Damage deposit $750 $750 13. Farmer's Market a.10x10 Lot $40 $40 b.Half Lot $20 $20 c.Application fee $30 $30 d.Electrical fee $10 $10 14. Parklet Rentals a. Parklet Rental including Installation per Occurrence1,2 $500 $73/month, $876/year 15. Outlying Park Buildings (Tiffany Park Building, Kennydale Park Building, Teasdale Park Building) a.6-hour block - resident $200 $200 b.6-hour block - non-resident $240 $240 c.Deposit resident & non-resident $250 $250 d.Non-profit fee - per hour (no deposit required)$40 $40 e.Refundable Security and Damage deposit $750 $750 16. Renton History Museum a.Adult (18 yrs + up)$5 $5 b.Child ( 9 yrs - 17 yrs)$2 $2 SECTION VII. COMMUNITY CENTER PASS CARD & FEES 2025 2026 Fees and associated descriptions are published and available in the "Let's Go Renton" Recreation Guide. SECTION VIII. AIRPORT CHARGES 2025 2026 1.Airport Fuel Flow Charge: per gallon $0.08 $0.08 2.JetA Fuel Flow Charge: per gallon $0.10 $0.10 3.T-Hangar Waitlist, one time fee $100 $100 4 T-Hangar, Move-in Fee (non-refundable)$250 $250 5 T-Hangar Rental Space (monthly) (plus leasehold excise tax)$580 $580 6 Tie-down Waitlist, one time fee $25 $25 7 Tie-down Rental Space (monthly) (plus leasehold excise tax)$185.60 $185.60 8.Penalty for violation of Minimum Standards/Airport Rules & Regulations (each occurrence)$500 $500 9.Penalty for Movement Area Incursions (each occurrence), assessed to sponsor/tenant $500 $500 10 Lost gate card fee per occurrence $50 $50 11 Transient airplane parking (daily)$8 $8 SECTION IX. ANIMAL LICENSES FEES1 - RMC 5-4-2 2025 2026 1.Altered Animal Annual License $30 $30 2.Unaltered Animal Annual License $50 $50 3.Economically Qualified Resident Special Lifetime License $0 $0 4.Duplicate Tag $10 $10 2 Parklet rental is subject to sales tax 1 Long-Term Right of Way Permit will be required if located within the City Right of Way. See Section XII, Development Fees, of the City of Renton Fee Schedule Brochure: Subsection e of subsection 3, Site Work, Utilities, and Right of Way Fees 1 Please note, impounded animals are subject to license fees, microchipping costs, and other out-of-pocket costs as specified in RMC 6-6-2. 4 City of Renton Fee Schedule 2025-2026 SECTION X. BUSINESS LICENSES 2025 2026 1. General Business License: a.Registration Fee $150 $150 b.Per hour fee, for each worker hour *$0.0352 $0.0352 b.Appeal of Business License Decision $250 $250 2. Short Term Employment within the City: a.A temporary ninety (90) day license maybe purchased for each FTE on a temporary job*$50 $50 *Not to exceed 270 consecutive days 2. Penalties: a.The penalty to reinstate an expired business license $50 $50 b.The penalty for failure to obtain a business license $250 $250 c. SECTION XI. ADULT ENTERTAINMENT LICENSES 2025 2026 1. Every person applying for a adult entertainment license shall pay the applicable nonrefundable application fee: a.Adult Entertainment Business License $750 $750 b.Entertainer $75 $75 c.Manager $75 $75 d.License Replacement $10 $10 2. Penalties: a.Civil Penalty, per violation $1,000 $1,000 5%-15% 5%-15% * Payment of all license fee amounts still owing for the last three (3) years, plus a penalty of (20%) per annum for all amounts owing, plus any accounting, legal or administrative expenses incurred by the City in determining the nonreporting, or the unpaid portion over the last (3) years or in collecting the tax and/or penalty. Failure to pay the license fee within one day after the day on which it is due and payable pursuant to subsection C7 of Chapter 5 of the RMC shall render the business enterprise subject to a penalty of (5%) of the amount of the license fee for the first month of the delinquency and an additional penalty of (5%) for each succeeding month of delinquency, but not exceeding a total penalty of (15%) of the amount of such license fee. * Per hour rate shall be adjusted every other year by Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, All Items, Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (also known as CPI-W) ending August 31, for the same two year period. 5 City of Renton Fee Schedule 2025-2026 SECTION XII. DEVELOPMENT FEES 2025 2026 1. a. (i)$43 $44 b. (i)$327 $337 (ii)$359 $370 (iii)$262 $270 (iv)$294 $303 (v)$294 $303 (vi)$359 $370 c. (i)65% of permit fee 65% of permit fee (ii)50% of initial plan Check Fee 50% of initial plan Check Fee d. (i)$25 $25 (ii) (1)$6.50 $6.50 (2)$2 $2 e. (i) (1) (a)$277 $286 (b)$294 $303 (2) (a)$215 $222 (b)$228 $235 (c)$27 $28 (d)$215 $222 (e)$96 $99 (ii) (1)$85 $88 (2)$85 + 4.95% of value $88 + 5.03% of value (3)$109.75+ 4.95% of value $113.15 + 5.24% of value (4)$313.20 + 2.66% of value $322.91 + 2.74% of value (5)$1,508.46 + 1.76% of value $1,555.22 + 1.81% of value (6)$5,021.92 + 1.50% of value $5,177.60 + 1.55% of value (7)$16,265.03 + 0.55% of value $16,769.25 + 0.56% of value (iii)$215 $222 (iv) (1)$215 $222 (2)$215 $222 (3)$215 $222 (5) (a)$139 $143 (b)$215 $222 f.$196 $202 $5,149.40 + $7.56 x each $1,000 value $5,308.23 + $7.79 x each $1,000 value $8,928.40 + $5.83 x each $1,000 value $9,205.04 + $6.02 x each $1,000 value 50% of commercial fees Minimum $209 50% of commercial fees Minimum $209 $196 on 1st unit / $25 each add'l unit $202 on 1st unit / $26 each add'l unit 1 This covers only the Building Section inspection of the structure prior to move. There is a separate additional fee charged by the Public Works Department to cover the actual house move permit. A building permit is also required in order to site the structure on the new site. 1 This fee shall be $0 for City of Renton Capital Improvement Projects or city funded projects. 2 Building Plan Check Fee is in addition to the building permit fees, demolition permit fees, and combination building permit fees. The plan check fee is equal to 65% of the building permit fee, or the demolition permit fee, or the combination building permit fee. Includes three (3) review cycles. Building Plan Check Fee1,3 Combination Building Permit Fees1,2 $500.01 to $1,000.00 $1,000.01 to 5,000.00 $5,000.01 to $50,000.00 $50,000.01 to $250,000.00 $250,000.01 to $1,000,000.00 Cooling system circuit for new or replaced appliance Up to 200 AMP Over 200 AMP Base Residential Fee Each additional unit after first unit $43 + $4.87 x each $100 value $44 + $7.98 x each $100 value $116.06 + $22.30 x each $1,000 value $119.66 x $22.99 each $1,000 value $628.97 + $16.05 x each $1,000 value $648.47 + $16.55 x each $1,000 value $1,029.90 + $11.19 x each $1,000 value $1,062.23 + $11.53 x each $1,000 value $1,589.40 + $8.90 x each $1,000 value $1,638.89 + $9.17 x each $1,000 value Review Fee Temporary Electrical Services Miscellaneous Electrical Fees Multi-Family, Commercial and Industrial Fees: Fees based on value of work. Residential Fees - Single -Family and Duplex State Building Code Fee: Electrical Permit Fees1: Non-residential projects $1.00 to $500.00 Signs per each Mobile Homes Low Voltage Work (e.g., alarm systems; thermostats; computer, data, or phone lines; fiber optics, cable television, etc.) (4) Job Trailers $1,000,000.01 and up Building and Demolition Permit Fees1: Building Fees: (viii) (vii) (vi) (ii) (iii) (iv) (v) Base Fee/Valuation $1.00 to $500.00 Valuation $501.00 to $2,000.00 Valuation $2001.00 to 25,000.00 Valuation $25,001.00 to $50,000.00 Valuation $50,001.00 to $100,000.00 Valuation $100,001.00 to $500,000.00 Valuation $500,001.00 to $1,000,000.00 Valuation $1,000,001.00 and up Residential projects: Residential Photovoltaic (PV) Solar Panel Permit fee New Service - Single Family and Duplex Service Changes/New Circuits - Single Family and Duplex: Change up to 200 AMP Change over 200 AMP Any new circuits added to above price is per each up to a maximum of $80.00 Minimum fee for remodel/addition of new circuits without a service charge Inspection Fee For Condominium Conversions House Moving1 - minimum per hour Inspection Fee: Plumbing up to 3,000 sq ft Plumbing over 3,000 sq ft Mechanical up to 3,000 sq ft Mechanical over 3,000 sq ft Electrical up to 3,000 sq ft Electrical over 3,000 sq ft g. 1 This fee shall be $0 for Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU) that are through the City of Renton's Permit Ready ADU (PRADU) Program as they have already been reviewed. 1 Combination Building Permit fees are required for each new single family residential structure. 2 This fee shall be $0 for City of Renton Capital Improvement Projects or city funded projects. 3 This fee shall be $0 for City of Renton Capital Improvement Projects or city funded projects. 1 Exemption: Residential telephone communication systems, thermostats, security systems, and cable television installations are exempt from fees Initial Building Plan Check Fee2 Additional Building Plan Check Fee 6 City of Renton Fee Schedule 2025-2026 SECTION XII. DEVELOPMENT FEES (CONTINUED)2025 2026 1. h. (i)$196 $202 (ii)Building Permit Fees Building Permit Fees i. (i)$67 $69 (1)$27 $28 (2) Boiler or Compressor $27 $28 (3)$27 $28 (4) Ventilation/exhaust fan $27 $28 (5) Fuel Gas Piping (each gas piping system up to 6 outlets)$27 $28 (ii)$99 $102 (1)$46 $47 (2) Boiler or Compressor $99 $102 (3) Refrigeration System $99 $102 (4)$99 $102 (5) Incinerator: Installation or relocation of each $131 $135 (6)$46 $47 (7) Fuel Gas Piping (each gas piping system up to 6 outlets)$46 $47 j. (i) Residential - Plumbing Permit base fee plus itemized fees below: $67 $69 (1)$12 $12 (2) Water Service: For meter to house $12 $12 (3) Per fixture for repair or alteration of drainage or vent piping $12 $12 (4) Per drain for rainwater systems $12 $12 (5) Per lawn sprinkler system, includes backflow prevention $12 $12 (6) Per vacuum breaker or backflow protection device on tanks, vats, etc.$12 $12 (7) Per interceptor for industrial waste pretreatment $12 $12 (8) Fuel Gas Piping: (each gas piping system up to 6 outlets)$27 $28 (ii) Commercial or Multi-Family: Plumbing Permit base fee plus itemized fees below: $99 $102 (1)$20 $21 (2)$20 $21 (3)$20 $21 (4)$20 $21 (5)$20 $21 (6)$20 $21 (7)$20 $21 (8)$34 $35 (9)$99 $102 k. (i) (1)$327 $337 (2)$327 $337 (ii) (1)$99 $102 (2)$99 $102 (3)$65 $67 (4)$163 $168 (5)$99 $102 (6)$99 $102 l. (i) (1)$163 $168 (2)$163 $168 (3)$163 $168 (4)$175/hr $175/hr (ii) (1)40% 40% (2)50% 50% (3)$158/hr $158/hr (4)5% of Permit Fee 5% of Permit Fee (5)5% of Permit Fee 5% of Permit Fee (iii)2 X Permit Fee 2 X Permit Fee Decorative Flags fee is per entrance and valid until flag(s) are removed Roof, projecting, awning, canopy, marquee, and wall signs Freestanding ground and pole signs Temporary and Portable Signs: Per plumbing fixture (e.g., sink, shower, toilet, dishwasher, tub, etc.) or set of fixtures on one trap Water Service: For meter to building Mechanical Permit Fees: Residential - Mechanical Permit base fee plus itemized fees below: Commercial or Multi-Family - Mechanical Permit base fee plus itemized fees below: Miscellaneous Fees: Fuel Gas Piping: (each gas piping system up to 6 outlets) Medical Gas Piping: (each gas piping system up to 6 outlets) Sign Permit Fees1: Plumbing Permit Fees: Per fixture for repair or alteration of drainage or vent piping Per drain for rainwater systems Per lawn sprinkler system, includes backflow prevention Heating system (furnace, heat pump, suspended heater, fireplace, wood stove, etc.). A/C system (air conditioner, chiller or Air Handling Unit (VAV) including ducts and vents) Additional Plan Review Fees: Over three review cycles (percentage of plan review fee) Miscellaneous Plan Review: hourly fee. Within a manufactured home park Manufactured/Mobile Home Installation Fees1: Appliance or piece of equipment regulated by this code but not classed in other appliance categories, or for which no other fee is listed in this code Appliance or piece of equipment regulated by this code but not classed in other appliance categories, or for which no other fee is listed in this code Outside of a manufactured home park Building Fees: (Continued) WABO - Adult Family Home; Misc building inspection Commercial Hood: Installation of each served by a mechanical exhaust, including the ducts for such hood each Heating system (furnace, heat pump, suspended heater, fireplace, wood stove, etc.). A/C system (air conditioner, chiller or Air Handling Unit (VAV) including ducts and vents) Reinspection Fee; Misc building inspection Real Estate Directional Signs, pursuant to RMC 4-4-100J2, permit valid for a 12-months period Grand Opening Event Signs, pursuant to RMC 4-4-100J6d(i) Per plumbing fixture (e.g., sink, shower, toilet, dishwasher, tub, etc.) or set of fixtures on one trap Minimum Housing Inspection Per vacuum breaker or backflow protection device on tanks, vats, etc. Per interceptor for industrial waste pretreatment 3 This fee shall be $0 for City of Renton Capital Improvement Projects or city funded projects. 1 This fee shall be $0 for Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU) that are through the City of Renton's Permit Ready ADU (PRADU) Program as they have already been reviewed. 2 Applies to inspection performed on Saturdays, Sundays, observed City of Renton holidays, and non-holiday Monday-Fridays outside the hours of 7:00AM to 3:30PM Work commencing before permit Issuance: Where work for which the permit is required is started prior to obtaining the permit, a special investigation fee in an amount equal to twice the permit fee shall be charged. The special investigation fee shall be paid in addition to the required permit fees.3 Permanent Signs: Inspection Fees: Plan Review Fees3: Event Signs, pursuant to RMC 4-4-100J6d(ii) and (iii) per sign, per promotion A-Frame Signs, pursuant to RMC 4-4-100J5 Charge is for the first sign, all subsequent signs are $50.00 Commercial Property Real Estate Banner each sign permit is valid for 12 months. After hours inspection2 1 This fee shall be $0 for City of Renton Capital Improvement Projects or city funded projects. 1 Includes plan review and inspection fees for the foundation (electrical, plumbing, mechanical, sewer and water connection fees are in addition to the below amounts). Site Plan/Zoning Review1 Engineering Review1 Electrical, Plumbing, or Mechanical Permits (percentage of permit fee) 7 City of Renton Fee Schedule 2025-2026 SECTION XII. DEVELOPMENT FEES (CONTINUED)2025 2026 2. a. (i)$58 $60 (ii)$124 $128 (iii) (1)$6,083 $6,272 (2)$6,083 $6,272 (iv) (1)$577 $595 (2)$577 $595 (3)$577 $595 (v) (1)$3,057 $3,152 (2)$6,114 $6,304 (vi) (vii)$6,083 $6,272 (viii) (1)$3,825 $3,944 (2)$1,856 $1,914 (3)50% of Application Fee 50% of Application Fee (4)Application Fee Application Fee (ix)N/C N/C (x)$1,454 $1,499 (xii)$11,588 $11,947 (xiii)100% of cost 100% of cost (xiv)$1,856 $1,914 (xv)$1,856 $1,914 (xvi)$186 $192 (xvii)$6,268 $6,462 (xviii) Home Occupation Permit (Special)$230 $230 (xix)$186 $192 (xx)N/C N/C (xxi)$588 $606 (xxii)$1,268 $1,307 (xxiii) (1)$1,268 $1,307 (2)$3,763 $3,880 (3)$1,856 $1,914 (xxiv)$175 $180 (xxv) (1)$6,268 $6,462 (2)$3,134 $3,231 (3)$12,547 $12,936 (4)$6,268 $6,462 (5)50% of Application Fee 50% of Application Fee (6)Application Fee Application Fee (xxvi) (1)$6,268 $6,462 (2)$3,124 $3,221 (xxvii) (1)$588 $606 (2)$1,784 $1,839 (xxviii)N/C N/C (xxix)$6,083 $6,272 (xxx)$124 $128 (xxxi) (1)N/C N/C (2)$3,124 $3,221 (3)$3,763 $3,880 (4)$3,763 $3,880 (xxxii) (1)$4,402 $4,538 (2)$3,124 $3,221 (3)50% of Application Fee 50% of Application Fee (4)Application Fees Application Fees (xxxiii)$588 $606 (xxxiv)$3,124 $3,221 (xxxv) (1)$289 $298 (2)$289 $298 (xxxvi) (1)$124 $128 (2)$237 $244 (xxxvii)$1,536 $1,584 (xxxviii)$299 $308 (xxxix)$557 $574 100% of contract cost 100% of contract cost Modification (major) required new application and repayment of fee required Small Cell Permit, per site4 Special Permit (Hearing Examiner) Street Naming (Honorary) Substantial Development Permit Planned Urban Development: Preliminary Plan Final Plan Reasonable Use Exception: In conjunction with land use permit Stand alone Application Conditional Use Permit Variance Hearing Examiner Review Administrative Review Modification (minor, administrative) Site Development Plan (Site Plan or Master Plan which includes design review fee for projects subject to RMC 4-3- 100): Waiver or Modification of Code Requirements cost is per request Zoning Compliance Letter Installation Temporary Use Permits: Tier 1 Tier 2 Variance (per each variance requested) Administrative or Hearing Examiner Public Arts Exemption Rezone Routine Vegetation Management Permit without Critical Areas Shoreline-Related Permits: Shoreline Permit Exemption Major Plat Amendment Manufactured/Mobile Home Park: Tentative Preliminary Final Open Space Classification Request Plats: Preliminary Short Plat Final Short Plat Preliminary Plat Final Plat Minor Plat Amendment Development Agreement Environmental Impact Statement Cost include the coordination, review and appeal. Draft and Final3 Environmental Checklist Review General Land Use Review1,5: Additional Animals Permit Address Change Annexation: Less than 10 acres Administrative Appeal of: Hearing Examiner's Decision Administrative Decision Environmental Decision Binding Site Plan Code Text Amendment Comprehensive Plan Map or Text Amendment (each) Conditional Use Permit: Critical Areas Exemption Critical Areas Permit (xi)Critical Areas Review Fee: for those projects that propose impacts to critical areas and will be billed at the cost of contract biologist’s review.2 Lot Line Adjustment Environmental (SEPA) Addendum Fence Permit (special) Grading and Filling Permit (Hearing Examiner) Landscape Review Fee Legal Lot Segregation Lot Consolidation 10 acres or more Land Use Review Fees: HEX Revision (minor, administrative) Revision (major) Preliminary Final 8 City of Renton Fee Schedule 2025-2026 SECTION XII. DEVELOPMENT FEES (CONTINUED)2025 2026 2. a. b. (i)$175/hr $175/hr 1 Exception for Projects Vested in the County: For those projects that have vested to a land use permit under the development regulations of King County, the King County Land Use Review Fee Schedule shall apply, and is hereby adopted by reference. A copy of that fee schedule has been filed with the City Clerk and is available at the City Clerk’s office for public review. SECTION XII. DEVELOPMENT FEES (CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE) Permit review staff overtime (applies only if permit review is requested by the applicant to be performed on Saturdays, Sundays, observed City of Renton holidays, and non-holiday Monday-Fridays outside of the hours of city staff regular work schedule) Land Use Review Fees: (Continued) Miscellaneous Fees1: General Land Use Review1,5: (Continued) 5 This fee shall be $0 for City of Renton Capital Improvement Projects or city funded projects. 1 Exception for Projects Vested in the County: For those projects that have vested to a land use permit under the development regulations of King County, the King County Land Use Review Fee Schedule shall apply, and is hereby adopted by reference. A copy of that fee schedule has been filed with the City Clerk and is available at the City Clerk’s office for public review. 2 Per RMC 4-3-050F7, the City may charge and collect fees from any applicant to cover costs incurred by the City in review of plans, studies, monitoring reports and other documents related to evaluation of impacts to or hazards from critical areas and subsequent code-required monitoring. 3 When the City is the lead agency for a proposal requiring an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) determines that the EIS shall be prepared, the City may charge and collect a reasonable fee from any applicant to cover costs incurred by the City in preparing the EIS. The ERC shall advise the applicant(s) of the projected costs for the EIS prior to actual preparation; the applicant shall post bond or otherwise ensure payment of such costs. The ERC may determine that the City will contract directly with a consultant for preparation of an EIS, or a portion of the EIS, and may bill such costs and expenses directly to the applicant. Such consultants shall be selected by mutual agreement of the City and applicant after a call for proposals. If a proposal is modified so that an EIS is no longer required, the ERC shall refund any fees collected under this subsection which remain after incurred costs are paid. The City may collect a reasonable fee from an applicant to cover the cost of meeting the public notice requirements of this Title relating to the applicant’s proposal. The City shall not collect a fee for performing its duties as a consulted agency. The City may charge any person for copies of any document prepared under this Title, and for mailing the document, in a manner provided by chapter 42.17 RCW. 4 Prior to issuance of a small cell permit, the applicant shall pay the actual administrative expenses incurred by the City that are directly related to the City's review of the application, including plan inspection, and approval, as authorized by RCW 35.21.860(1)(b), as may be amended. 9 City of Renton Fee Schedule 2025-2026 2025 2026 3. a. (i) Grade and Fill Quantity Cleared or Disturbed Area < 50 cy < 500 sf 50 cy - 499 cy 500 sf - < 3/4 acre 500 cy - 4,999 cy 3/4 ac - < 1 ac 5,000 cy - 49,999 cy 1 ac - < 2.5 ac 50,000 cy - 99,999 cy 2.5 ac - < 5 ac 100,000 cy and larger 5 ac and larger (1) (a)N/A N/A (b)$536 $553 (c)$722 $744 (d)$1,083 $1,117 (f)$1,443 $1,488 (e)$1,804 $1,860 (2) (a)N/A N/A (b)$516 $532 (c)$1,031 $1,063 (d)$1,371 $1,414 (f)$2,742 $2,827 (e)$4,114 $4,242 (3)1.5 x Review/Intake Fee 1.5 x Review/Intake Fee (4)1.5 x Review/Intake Fee 1.5 x Review/Intake Fee (ii) (1)6% of cost 6% of cost (2)$9,000 + 5% over $150,000 $9,000 + 5% over $150,000 (3)$17,500 + 4% over $350,000 $17,500 + 4% over $350,000 (iii)0.5% of cost 0.5% of cost (iv) $289 $298 (2)$1,753 $1,807 (v)$3,093 $3,189 b. (i) (1)$1,155 $1,191 (2)$2,320 $2,392 (3)$4,640 $4,784 (ii) (1)15% of total 15% of total (2)10% of total 10% of total (3)5% of total 5% of total (iii)$866 $893 c. (i) (1) (a)$5,025 $5,025 (b)$671 $671 (c)$4,025 $4,025 (2) (a)$25,125 $25,125 (b)$3,355 $3,355 (c)$20,125 $20,125 (3) (a)$40,200 $40,200 (b)$5,368 $5,368 (c)$32,200 $32,200 1 Fees are based on the amount covered by the Latecomers'. 2 The administration and collection fee is deducted from each individual latecomer fee payment and the balance forwarded to the holder of the latecomer’s agreement pursuant to RMC 9-5, Tender of Fee. Water service fee3 Fire sprinkler service fee 1,2 Wastewater fee3 1-1/2 inch: SECTION XII. DEVELOPMENT FEES (CONTINUED) Site Work, Utilities, and Right of Way Fees: Site Work and Civil Construction Fees3,4,5,9: Tier 0 1 2 3 4 Clearing, Grading, Excavation, and Mining Permits and License Fees: Fees shall be based on the highest tier triggered. Civil construction plan review and inspection fees 6,7,8: Plan Revision following Permit Issuance: (1)Minor (Results in a change 10% or less than the cost of improvements 7. Excludes minor adjustments that are approved by the City to be shown on record drawings.) Major (Results in a change of greater than 10% of the cost of improvements 7.) Annual Licenses of Solid Waste Fills Review Fee1,2: $150,000.00 or less Over $150,000.00 but less than $350,000.00 $350,000.00 and over Site Plan/Zoning Review and Inspection Fee6,7 1 The fee for a grading license authorizing additional work to that under a valid license shall be the difference between the fee paid for the original license and the fee shown for the entire project. 2 Any unused fee may be carried forward to the next year. If any work is done before the license is issued, the grading license fee shall be doubled. 3 All developers, municipal or quasi-municipal entities, or utility corporations or companies, except those specifically exempted, shall pay fees under this Section. Exempted entities include City- franchised cable TV, cable modem, natural gas, telecommunications, and electrical power. 4 Includes three (3) review cycles. Additional reviews will be charged $1,700 each. Multi-family: 2 units, Duplexes, & Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU)1 $50,000 or less Wastewater fee3 2 inch: Water service fee3 Water service fee3 Segregation processing fee, if applicable $200,000 and over Tier 4 Tier 5 Over $50,000 but less than $200,000 5/8 x 3/4 inch and 1 inch: Water and Wastewater System Development Charges (SDC): Utility System Development Charges (SDC): Latecomers' Agreement Application Fees1,3: Processing fee2 (Nonrefundable) $50,000 or less Over $50,000 but less than $200,000 $200,000 and over Wet weather (annual fee) 5 If deemed necessary by the City in its sole discretion, the City will contract with one or more consultants to provide plan reviews and/or inspections with the related costs and expenses payable by the applicant. 6 The fee shall be based up percentage of the estimated cost of improvements. 7 Cost of improvements shall be based on the City's bond quantity worksheet and shall include all project related improvements outside of the building envelopes, including, but not limited to, all costs required to construct the following: paved parking lots, private sidewalks or walkways; private and public storm water management facilities; temporary erosion and sedimentation control facilities; water quality facilities; public and private streets; public and private sanitary sewers; public water main improvements; required off-site street, bike and pedestrian improvements; street lighting improvements; required landscaping and street tree improvements; and site grading and mobilization costs. The applicant may elect to submit a separate, itemized cost estimates for each item of improvement subject to the approval by the City. 9 This fee shall be $0 for City of Renton Capital Improvement Projects or city funded projects. Project shall pay for site inspection services at actual cost. 8 Fifty Percent (50%) of the fee is due at Civil Construction Permit Application and the remaining shall be due prior to permit issuance. 3 This fee shall be $0 for City of Renton Capital Improvement Projects or city funded projects. Fire sprinkler service fee 1,2 Wastewater fee3 Fire sprinkler service fee 1,2 Solid Waste Fills Review Fee1: Inspection/Issuance Fee: Review/Intake Fee: Tier 0 (no permit required) 5 New or Replaced Hard Surface < 500 sf 500 sf - 4,999 sf 5,000 sf - < 1 ac 1 ac - < 2.5 ac 2.5 ac - < 5 ac 5 ac and larger Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 Tier 0 (no permit required) Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 10 City of Renton Fee Schedule 2025-2026 2025 2026 3. c. (4) (a)$80,400 $80,400 (b)$10,736 $10,736 (c)$64,400 $64,400 (5) (a)$125,625 $125,625 (b)$16,776 $16,776 (c)$100,625 $100,625 (6) (a)$251,250 $251,250 (b)$33,551 $33,551 (c)$201,250 $201,250 (7) (a)$402,000 $402,000 (b)$53,682 $53,682 (c)$322,000 $322,000 (ii) (1)$2,350 $2,350 (3)$0.940 per sq foot $0.940 per sq foot (iii)$840 + administrative costs $840 + administrative costs (iv) d. (i) (1) (a)$50 $50 (c)Time and materials Time and materials (d)$275 $275 (e)$95 $95 (f)$250 $250 (g)$560 $560 (h)$1,025 $1,025 (i)$80 $80 (k)$185 $185 (n)Time and materials Time and materials (o)$50 $50 (p)$200 $200 (2) (a) (i)$2,875 $2,875 (ii)$400 $400 (b) (i)$2,935 $2,935 (ii)$400 $400 (c) (i)$2,875 $2,875 (ii)$460 $460 (d) (i)$4,605 $4,605 (ii)$750 $750 1 Based upon the size of the fire sprinkler service (NOT detector bypass meter) 2 Unless a separate fire sprinkler service is provided, the system development charge(s) shall be based upon the size of the meter installed and a separate Fire sprinkler service fee will not be charged. 3 Any parcel that currently has water and or sewer service is eligible for a prorated system development charge is eligible for credit of the existing connection. Fee(s) based upon meter(s) proposed for final project will be reduced by the fee(s) based upon meter existing on site. 4 The applicant shall pay the City’s administrative costs for the preparation, processing and recording of the partial payment of the fee(s). If the same segregation is used for more than one utility’s special assessment district, and/or latecomer’s charge, then only one administrative fee is collected. 5 Temporary connection may be granted for a one-time, temporary, short-term use of a portion of the property for a period not to exceed three (3) consecutive years. Fee shall be paid annually (non- prorated), and shall be nonrefundable, nontransferable (from one portion of the property to another) and shall not constitute a credit to the system development charge due at the time of permanent use of the utility system. The application for temporary connection shall consist of a detailed plan and a boundary line of the proposed development service area for use in the fee determination. $2,000 deposit + time and materials $250 + $0.15 per lineal foot Cost of test + $70 processing fee Cost of test + $70 processing fee $2,000 deposit + time and materials $250 + $0.15 per lineal foot $0.940 per sq foot $0.940 per sq foot 30% of SDC $60 deposit + time and materials $60 deposit + time and materials Fire sprinkler service fee 1,2 Wastewater fee3 Water service fee3 Fire sprinkler service fee 1,2 Wastewater fee3 Water service fee3 Temporary Utility Connection5: (2) Utility SDC Segregation Request4 (1) Utility Construction Permit Fees: Water Construction Permit Fees: 30% of SDC 30% of SDC 30% of SDC 30% of SDC 30% of SDCWater Fee; Annual fee equal to thirty percent (30%) of the current SDC applicable to the size of the temporary water meter(s). (3) Storm Water Fee; Fee equal to thirty percent (30%) of the current SDC applicable to that portion of the property. Water service fee3 6 inch: Wastewater Fee; Annual fee equal to thirty percent (30%) of the current SDC applicable to the size of the temporary domestic water meter(s). Storm Water System Development Charges (SDC): New single family residence (including mobile/manufactured homes) & Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) Site Work, Utilities, and Right of Way Fees: (Continued) Utility System Development Charges (SDC): (Continued) (2) Water main cut and cap Installation of stub service and meter setter only. Water meter installation fees – City installed: Installation fees for ring and cover castings (l) (m) Water quality/inspection/purity tests Water turn ons/offs after hours New water line chlorination fee. Fee plus $0.15 per lineal foot for any footage after the first two hundred fifty (250) lineal feet Water meter tests for 3/4” to 2" meter Water Testing, Construction, and Administration Fees: Drop in meter only Drop in meter only Drop in meter only Drop in meter only 3/4” meter installed by City outside City limits (b) (j) Water meter tests on meters 2" or larger Specialty water tests (lead, copper, etc) Water main connections Installation of isolation valve. Open and close fire hydrants for fire flow tests conducted by others. Water service disconnection (cut at main) Meter resets Repair of damage to service Miscellaneous water installation fees. Service size reductions Installation of stub service and meter setter only. 3/4” meter installed by City within City limits. Fire sprinkler service fee 1,2 Wastewater fee3 8 inch: Addition to existing single family residence greater than 500 square feet (including mobile/manufactured homes) Fee not to exceed $2,350 3 inch: Water service fee3 All other uses charge per square foot of new impervious surface, but not less than $2,350 Fire sprinkler service fee 1,2 Wastewater fee3 4 inch: Installation of stub service and meter setter only. 1” meter installed by the City. Installation of stub service and meter setter only. 1-1/2" meter installed by the City. SECTION XII. DEVELOPMENT FEES (CONTINUED) 11 City of Renton Fee Schedule 2025-2026 2025 2026 3. d. (e) (i)$4,735 $4,735 (ii)$950 $950 (4) (a)$50 $50 (b) (i)$500 $500 (ii)$2,000 $2,000 (iii)$25 $25 (c) (i)$50 $50 (ii)$250 $250 (ii) (1) (a)$375 $375 (b)$375 $375 (2) (a)$375 $375 (b)$375 $375 (3) (a)$375 $375 (b)$375 $375 (4) (a)$375 $375 (b)$375 $375 (5) (a)$375 $375 (b)$375 $375 (6)$375 $375 $375 $375 (iv)$525 $525 (v) (1)$500 $500 (2)$1,000 $1,000 e. (i) (1)$175/hr $175/hr (2) (a)$690 $710 (b)$690 + Time and Materials $710 + Time and Materials (c)$690 $710 (3) (a)Time and Materials Time and Materials (b)$140 $140 (c)$880 + Time and Materials $910 + Time and Materials (i) (1)$715.38 $715.38 (2)$1,430.76 $1,430.76 (3)$2,146.14 $2,146.14 (4)$2,861.51 $2,861.51 (5)$3,576.89 $3,576.89 (ii)Actual cost Actual cost (e)$270 $270 (f)Actual cost Actual cost (4) (a)$10.00 $10.00 (b)$20.00 $20.00 (c)$30.00 $30.00 (ii) (1)$380 $390 (2)$720 $740 (3)$375 $375 $220 $220 plus King County sewer rate on discharged amount plus King County sewer rate on discharged amount 2” meter installed by the City. Hydrant Meter fees: Hydrant meter permit fee Deposits: (3)Water meter processing fees – Applicant installed: For meters larger than 2”, the applicant must provide materials and install the meter. Installation of stub service and meter setter only. SECTION XII. DEVELOPMENT FEES (CONTINUED) Site Work, Utilities, and Right of Way Fees: (Continued) Utility Construction Permit Fees: (Continued) Drop in meter only Wastewater permit fee Street light system fee, per new connection to power system Utility Locate Refresh Fee (Fee is due each time excavator calls in for locate refresh during 45-day locate ticket) Ground water discharge (temporary connection to wastewater system for discharge of contaminated ground water over 50,000 gallons) Rate plus billed for current Renton and King County sewer rate on discharged amount (meter provided by property owner) Surface water permit fee Repair or modification of any of the above Surface water permit fee Commercial: Wastewater permit fee Surface water permit fee Industrial: Wastewater permit fee 3/4” meter and backflow prevention assembly. 3” meter and backflow prevention assembly. Deposit processing charge, nonrefundable. Meter rental (begins on day of pickup): 3/4” meter and backflow prevention assembly. Per month. 3” meter and backflow prevention assembly. Per month. Wastewater and Surface Water Construction Permit Fees: Residential: Wastewater permit fee All other work, permit fee plus staff time per hour 6 Other public agencies constructing utilities within City right-of-way Small Cell Master Lease Agreement including Site License Addendum and Small Cell Permits Master Lease Agreement Administrative Costs, Staff time per hour and/or cost of materials.6 Pole Reservation, per pole Administrative Fee, Base plus time and/or cost of materials.6 Large project locate Surface water permit fee Right of Way (ROW) Use Permits Fees1 Small work, including trenching less than 60 linear feet or installation of 6 or less utility poles Master Service Agreement Application Fee3 (7) Cut and Cap/Demolition Permit: Wastewater permit fee Surface water permit fee Reinspection for Wastewater or Surface Water Permits Franchise Permit Fees: 4,5 Standard locate Franchise Permit Fees: All other reimbursement Tier 2, conduit outside of planter strips excluding signalized intersection crossings, bridges and train tracks Short-Term ROW Permit Fees (duration 30 days or less)2,7: Public Reimbursement (any costs incurred by the City on behalf of the permit applicant for installation or operation of site equipment) All other fees6 Tier 1, Daily peak kWh <20 Tier 2, Daily peak kWh 21 - 40 Tier 3, Daily peak kWh 41 - 60 Tier 4, Daily peak kWh 61 - 80 Tier 5, Daily peak kWh >81 (d) Site License Addendum Rent Conduit Lease Rates per Lineal Foot (annual fee): Tier 1, conduit in existing planter strips Tier 3, conduit within signalized intersection crossings, bridges and train tracks Electrical service (annual fee) Single family residence, one unit only All other uses, excluding those listed 13 Wastewater or storm water service 12 City of Renton Fee Schedule 2025-2026 2025 2026 3. e. (iii) (1) (b) (i)$1,025 $1,025 (ii)$1,025 $1,025 (2) (i) (iv)$10 $10 f. (i)$290 $300 (ii)$290 $300 g. (i)$580 $600 (ii) (1)$870 $900 (2)$1,450 $1,490 (3)$2,320 $2,390 h. (i) (1) (a)$134/LF $138/LF (b)$159/LF $164/LF (ii)$163 $168 (iii)$163 $168 (iv)$158/hr $158/hr (v)$175/hr $175/hr (vi)$175/hr $175/hr (vii)Actual cost Actual cost (viii)$691 $712 3 Applies to inspections performed on Saturdays, Sundays, observed City of Renton holidays, and non-holiday Monday-Fridays outside the hours of 7:00am to 3:30pm. 4 Applies only if permit review is requested by the applicant to be performed on Saturdays, Sundays, observed City of Renton holidays, and non-holiday Monday-Fridays outside of the hours of city staff regular work schedule 5 Any work performed by City forces or under City contract on behalf of a permit applicant to repair damage to the City infrastructure or caused by the permit applicant or contractor under its control, or any and all roadway or right-of-way cleanup efforts performed by City forces or under City contract that resulted from the work performed by the permit applicant or contractors under its control. 2 Work and/or use of the right of way, including those associated with a Civil Construction Permit and excludes utilities from other public agencies and service providers which shall be considered under a franchise permit. 1 Bond required pursuant to RMC 9-10-5. 3 The fixed application fee established herein is intended to cover the City’s internal administrative costs in processing and administering the franchise. In addition to the fixed application fee, the City may require applicants to either directly pay or reimburse the City for external costs reasonably incurred to process the application and/or administer the franchise agreement. The City may require applicants to deposit funds in advance to cover legal and/or other professional services fees as they are incurred. 4 The City may decide to contract with a consultant to perform plan reviews and inspections and may bill such costs and expenses directly to the applicant. 5 If a franchise agreement does not specify the fee amount, the generic fee, as identified in this fee schedule, shall be collected. 6 Regular hours and standard after hour and overtime fees apply. 7A no fee permit may be issued for the following: individual homeowners performing work in street ROW for street tree or parking strip irrigation systems; residential moving pods or moving trucks provided that they are in the ROW for no more than three (3) days; use in CD zone provided ground disturbing activity is not proposed; and work associated with City of Renton capital improvement projects or City funded projects. 8 A no fee permit may be issued for the following: A public agency and when the proposed use of the right-of-way provides a direct service to the public (e.g., Metro applications for right-of-way for bus shelters); and work associated with City of Renton capital improvement projects or City funded projects. 9 Leasehold excise tax (LET) imposed pursuant to Chapter 82.29A RCW on leasehold interests for the use of real or personal public property shall be collected from the permittee at a rate established by the State of Washington. 10 Insurance Required: Public Liability and property damage insurance is also required pursuant to RMC 9-2-5B, Minimum Permit Requirements for Excess Right-of-Way Use. 11 Except those single family and two family uses that utilize right of way along a waterfront. 12 Right-of-way value shall be based on the assessed value of the land adjoining the property as established by the King County Assessor. 1 Unscheduled work includes, but is not limited to, site work that is found to be occurring, or did occur, for which an inspection was not scheduled. Fee is subject to be applied for each occurrence but does not replace a stop work order or other code violation as determined applicable by the City. The fee is in addition to any other applicable inspection fees. The fee may provide day of inspection at the discretion and availablility of the City inspector. 2 Applies only to those fees that are noted as time and materials and performed during city staff regular work schedule. Short-Term ROW Permit Fee + LET9 Short-Term ROW Permit Fee + LET9 $50 + LET9 $50 + LET9 0.5% x Value12 + LET9 0.5% x Value12 + LET9 0.5% x Value12 + LET9 0.5% x Value12 + LET9 (Sq Ft of addition / 1,160 sq ft) of Fee-in-lieu (Sq Ft of addition / 1,160 sq ft) of Fee-in-lieu Street with existing conveyance ditch Street with existing storm drainage main line (iii) 1 This fee shall be $0 for City of Renton Capital Improvement Projects or city funded projects. Within City Limits8; Short-Term ROW Permit Fee associated with use plus leasehold excise tax (LET)9 Service Installation Only Utility Extension per 100' of Length (Min 200' Length) All uses without public benefit; fee is a per month charge assessed annually based on property value 12 of land to be utilized, plus leasehold excise tax 9, if applicable. (a) Long Term ROW Permit Fees (duration over 30 days)2,13: SECTION XII. DEVELOPMENT FEES (CONTINUED) Site Work, Utilities, and Right of Way Fees: (Continued) Right of Way Use Permits Fees1 (Continued) King County ROW Permits/Inspections: Single family and two family uses11 Duration greater than thirty (30) days but no more than one (1) year: Duration greater than one (1) year8,10: (ii) 1 This fee shall be $0 for City of Renton Capital Improvement Projects or city funded projects. All other uses; fee is a per year charge of assessed value of land adjoining the property 12, plus leasehold excise tax9, if applicable. In no case less than $50.00. Processing and completion fee, payable upon Council approval of the vacation and upon administrative determination of appraised value of vacated right-of-way. Appraised Value of Vacated right-of-way: Street and Alley vacation Fees: The imposition, collection, payment and other specifics concerning this charge are detailed in chapter 9-14 RMC, Vacations.1 Release of easement fees: The imposition, collection, payment and other specifics concerning this charge are detailed in chapter 9-1 RMC, Easements.1 Filing fee Processing fee Filing fee 6 This fee shall be $0 for City of Renton Capital Improvement Projects or city funded projects. Project shall pay for site inspection services at actual cost. Less than $25,000 $25,000 to $75,000 Re-inspection Fee Over $75,000 Street Frontage Improvements Fee-In-Lieu: Miscellaneous Fees6: Public Works Reimbursement5 Standard or minor drainage adjustment review All eligible uses except Single Family Additions less than 1,160 sq ft: Single Family Additions less than 1,160 Sq Ft: Proportional share of the fee in lieu of all eligible uses fee based on square footage of addition. (2) Permit review staff overtime4 Regular Staff Review and Inspection Hours2 Inspection for Unscheduled Work 1 After hours inspection 3 Oversize Load Permits 13 This fee shall be $0 for City of Renton Capital Improvement Projects or city funded projects. 13 City of Renton Fee Schedule 2025-2026 2025 2026 4. 5.0% 5.0% 5. a. (i) (1)$4,728 $4,728 $0.00 (2)$0.00 $0.00 (ii) (1)$0.00 $0.00 (2)$0.00 $0.00 (iii) (1)$1,003 $1,003 $0.00 (2)$3,268 $3,268 $0.00 (iv)5% x School Impact Fee 5% x School Impact Fee b. ITE Land Use Codes (i)ITE LUC 220 See Footnote 5 See Footnote 5 (ii)ITE LUC 560 $4.79 $4.79 (iii)ITE LUC 936 $175.21 $175.21 (iv)ITE LUC 937 $211.59 $211.59 (v)ITE LUC 851 $207.87 $207.87 (vi)ITE LUC 565 $19.81 $19.81 (vii)ITE LUC 975 $14.58 $14.58 (viii)ITE LUC 912 $120.84 $120.84 (ix)ITE LUC 930 $68.10 $68.10 (x)ITE LUC 933 $180.23 $180.23 (xi)ITE LUC 934 $182.87 $182.87 (xii)ITE LUC 945 $89,966.30 $89,966.30 (xiii)ITE LUC 944 $87,536.72 $87,536.72 (xiv)ITE LUC 110 $6.36 $6.36 (xv)ITE LUC 710 $14.07 $14.07 (xvi)ITE LUC 492 $35.23 $35.23 (xvii)ITE LUC 157 $2.57 $2.57 (xiii)ITE LUC 155 $2.33 $2.33 (xix)ITE LUC 156 $10.12 $10.12 (xx)ITE LUC 154 $1.61 $1.61 (xxi) ITE LUC 610 $7.22 $7.22 (xxii) ITE LUC 310 $4,216.05 $4,216.05 (xxiii)ITE LUC 130 $5.62 $5.62 (xxiv) ITE LUC 140 $10.36 $10.36 (xxv)ITE LUC 420 $2,286.67 $2,286.67 (xxvi) ITE LUC 720 $36.23 $36.23 (xxvii) ITE LUC 240 $7,068.11 $7,068.11 (xxviii)ITE LUC 320 $3,001.25 $3,001.25 (xxix) ITE LUC 445 $786.04 $786.04 (xxx)ITE LUC 220 $6,184.59 $6,184.59 (xxxi) ITE LUC 620 $1,285.11 $1,285.11 (xxvii) ITE LUC 932 $56.02 $56.02 (xxxiii)ITE LUC 151 $1.50 $1.50 (xxxiv)ITE LUC 251 $3,694.69 $3,694.69 (xxxv)ITE LUC 820 $24.37 $24.37 (xxxvi)ITE LUC 210 $11,485.67 $11,485.67 (xxxvii)ITE LUC 850 $63.17 $63.17 (xxxiii)ITE LUC 215 $6,987.79 $6,987.79 (xxxix)ITE LUC 150 $3.29 $3.29 (xxxx)$8,031.94 $8,031.94 c. (i)$3,276.44 $3,276.44 (ii)$2,659.70 $2,659.70 (iii)$2,531.21 $2,531.21 (iv)$2,222.84 $2,222.84 (v)$2,325.63 $2,325.63 d. (i)$421.98 $421.98 $779.24 (ii)$579.41 $579.41 $1,099.68 (iii)$346.22 $346.22 $669.37 (iv)$1,052.00 $1052.00 $2,173.16 (v)$0.14 $0.14 $0.28 Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU)5, per dwelling Church, per sq foot Technology Surcharge Fee General Light Industrial, per sq foot High-Cube Warehouse: Cold Storage, per sq foot2 High-Cube Warehouse: Fulfillment Center (NS), per sq foot2 Impact Fees: Coffee/Donut Shop, no drive up, per sq foot SECTION XII. DEVELOPMENT FEES (CONTINUED) Transportation Impact Fees1,3,4,5: School Impact Fees: Issaquah School District Single Family Fee, per dwelling Multi Family, Duplex, & Accessory Dwelling Fee (ADU), per dwelling Kent School District Single Family Fee, per dwelling Multi Family, Duplex, & Accessory Dwelling Fee (ADU), per dwelling Renton School District Single Family Fee, per dwelling Multi Family, Duplex, & Accessory Dwelling Fee (ADU)1, per dwelling School Impact Fee Administration An additional technology surcharge shall be required for all fees included in the following Subsections of Section XII, Development Fees, of the City of Renton Fee Schedule Brochure: Subsection 1, Building Fees; Subsection a, except for appeals, critical areas review fee, and direct EIS costs, of subsection 2, Land Use Review Fees; Subsections a, b, c(iii), d, and e, except Master Franchise/Small Cell Permit Application Fee and Long Term ROW Permit Fees (duration over one year), of subsection 3, Site Work, Utilities, and Right of Way Fees; and Section XIII, Fire Department Fire Marshall Fees 1 Per House Bill 1337, effective 7/1/25, the impact fee for an ADU shall be capped at 50% of the impact fee that would be imposed on the principal unit, as defined in RCW 36.70A.696. If there are multiple principal unit types on a lot, the impact fee for the ADU shall be based on the principal unit on the lot that has the lowest impact fee. Coffee/Donut Shop, with drive up, per sq foot Convenience market - 24 hour, per sq foot Daycare, per sq foot Drinking Place, per sq foot Drive-in bank, per sq foot Fast food, no drive-up, per sq foot Fast Casual Dining with 30 seat max, incl. only walk-up window, per sq foot Park Impact Fees: 2 Impact fees include a Passenger Car-Equivalent (PCE) factor. 3 Applied fee reductions based on uses by percentage of Net New PM Peak Hour Person Vehicle Trip: Early Learning Facilities (i.e. Daycare) is 20% and Commercial/Retail/Industrial is 88.97% except uses with PCE factors which will remain at 100%. 4 All uses within the Center Downtown (CD) Zone shall be reduced to 20% of the assessed transportation impact fee. High-Cube Warehouse: Parcel Hub, per sq foot2 High-Cube Warehouse: Transload/Short-Term, per sq foot2 Industrial Park, per sq foot2 Multifamily Housing, per dwelling Self-service Storage, per sq foot Fast food, with drive-up, per sq foot 5 ADU fees shall be $6,184.59 per dwelling until 6/30/2025. Per House Bill 1337, effective 7/1/25, the impact fee for an ADU shall be capped at 50% of the impact fee that would be imposed on the principal unit, as defined in RCW 36.70A.696. If there are multiple principal unit types on a lot, the impact fee for the ADU shall be based on the principal unit on the lot that has the lowest impact fee. Single family, per dwelling unit Multi-family: 2 units, Duplexes, & Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU)1 , per dwelling unit Motel, per room Gas station with convenience store, per pump Gas station, per pump General office, per sq foot Health/fitness club, per sq foot Hospital, per sq foot Hotel, per room Manufacturing, per sq foot2 Marina, per boat berth Medical office, per sq foot Mobile home, per dwelling Movie theater, per seat Nursing home, per bed Restaurant: sit-down, per sq foot Senior housing - detached, per dwelling Shopping center, per sq foot Single family house, per dwelling Supermarket, per sq foot Net New PM Peak Hour Person Vehicle Trip (Proposed - Existing), per PM Peak Hour Person Vehicle Trip Townhouses, per dwelling Warehouse, per sq foot2 1 ITE LUC: Institutue of Transportation Engineers Land Use Codes defined in the 11th Edition ITE Trip Generation Handbook Multi-family: 5 or more units, per dwelling unit Mobile home, per dwelling unit Fire Impact Fees: Residential - single family (detached dwellings & duplexes), per dwelling unit Residential - multi family & Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU)1, per dwelling unit Multi-family: 3 or 4 units, per dwelling unit Hotel/motel/resort, per room Medical care facility, per bed Office, per sq foot 1 Per House Bill 1337, effective 7/1/25, the impact fee for an ADU shall be capped at 50% of the impact fee that would be imposed on the principal unit, as defined in RCW 36.70A.696. If there are multiple principal unit types on a lot, the impact fee for the ADU shall be based on the principal unit on the lot that has the lowest impact fee. 14 City of Renton Fee Schedule 2025-2026 2025 2026 5. (vi)$0.61 $0.61 $1.28 (vii)$0.66 $0.66 $1.19 (viii)$0.42 $0.42 $0.90 (ix)$1.44 $1.44 $2.32 (x)$0.05 $0.05 $0.10 (xi)$0.24 $0.24 $0.49 (xii)$28.02 $28.02 $63.96 (xiii)$0.13 $0.13 $0.27 e.$560 $560 f. (i)$100 $100 (ii)$100 $100 6. a.$1,000.00 $1,000.00 b. (i)$225.00 $225.00 (ii)$500.00 $500.00 c. (i) (1)$235,836.73 $235,836.73 (2)$227,510.20 $227,510.20 (3)$253,469.39 $253,469.39 (4)$406,775.51 $406,775.51 (5)$495,673.47 $495,673.47 (ii) (1)$167,265.31 $167,265.31 (2)$156,489.80 $156,489.80 (3)$170,204.08 $170,204.08 (4)$296,571.43 $296,571.43 (5)$368,326.53 $368,326.53 (iii) (1)$135,428.57 $135,428.57 (2)$124,653.06 $124,653.06 (3)$133,469.39 $133,469.39 (4)$247,591.84 $247,591.84 (5)$314,448.98 $314,448.98 (iv) (1)$201,551.02 $201,551.02 (2)$193,224.49 $193,224.49 (3)$211,836.73 $211,836.73 (4)$352,897.96 $352,897.96 (5)$432,000.00 $432,000.00 (iv) (1)$270,122.45 $270,122.45 (2)$261,795.92 $261,795.92 (3)$292,653.06 $292,653.06 (4)$458,204.08 $458,204.08 (5)$556,897.96 $556,897.96 SECTION XIII. FIRE DEPARMENT FIRE MARSHAL FEES (RFA)2025 2026 a. (i)$50 $50 $60 (ii)$50 + 2% of the cost $50 $75 + 2% of the cost (iii)$75 + 2% of the cost $200 $100 + 2% of the cost (iv)$200 + 1.5% of the cost $200 $250 + 1.5% of the cost (v)$450 + 1.2% of the cost $450 $525 + 1.2% of the cost (vi)$950 + .75% of the cost $950 $1,100 + .75% of the cost (vii) (viii) (ix) (x) (1)N/C N/C (2)$75 $75 (3)$150 $150 (xi)$35 $35 b. $150 $150 $185 $75 $75 $92.50 (iii)$250 $250 $325 $175 $175 $200 $150 $150 $175 $250 $250 $300 20% of plan review fee - 20% of plan review fee - Multifamily Tax Exemption Application Tree Fee in lieu, credit replacement, and/or credit supplement Per diameter inch measured at 4.5 feet above grade Labor cost for each 2" caliper (or 6ft tall) tree to be planted Miscellaneous Fees Fire plan review and inspection fees: Restaurant/lounge, per sq foot Independent Fee Calculation Review (or unless otherwise established by School District or Renton Regional Fire Authority)1 SECTION XII. DEVELOPMENT FEES (CONTINUED) Impact Fees: (Continued) Medical/dental office, per sq foot Retail, per sq foot Leisure facilities, per sq foot Industrial/manufacturing, per sq foot Church, per sq foot Education, per student Special public facilities, per sq foot 1 Per House Bill 1337, effective 7/1/25, the impact fee for an ADU shall be capped at 50% of the impact fee that would be imposed on the principal unit, as defined in RCW 36.70A.696. If there are multiple principal unit types on a lot, the impact fee for the ADU shall be based on the principal unit on the lot that has the lowest impact fee. (iv) Construction permit: Operational fire code permit (issued in accordance with Section 105.6 of the IFC) fee is yearly (includes items such as fire special events, covered stages, mobile food facilities, hot works, etc.) Permits for Mobile food facilities that have passed a fire and life safety inspection in another jurisdiction that has reciprocity with Renton RFA Hazardous materials and HPM facilities yearly (ADD & High Piled Storage) Late Payment Penalty $0 to $249.99 $250.00 to $999.99 $1,000.00 to $4,999.99 $5,000.00 to $49,999.99 $50,000.00 to $99,999.99 $100,000.00 and above Construction Re-inspection. Fee is per hour with a 2 hour minimum. The minimum maywill be assessed if the requested inspection does not meet the approval of the inspector. Violation/Second Re-Inspection after 30-day period (whenever 30 days or more have passed since Fire Department notification of a violation, which required a first re-inspection, and such violation has not been remedied or granted an extension) Third and subsequent re-Inspection/Pre-Citation Follow-Up Inspection when re-inspections are required beyond the first and second re-inspections Preventable Fire alarm fee: First, second, and third preventable alarms Fourth and fifth preventable alarms in a calendar year, fee is per each alarm. Sixth preventable alarm and successive preventable alarms in a calendar year, fee is per each alarm. Fire Permit type: (i) (ii) 3 The bedroom count utilized to calculate the cash payment in lieu shall be based on the bedroom count majority developed on-site. If the bedroom counts developed on-site are equally divided (e.g. 50% 1 bedrooms and 50% 2 bedrooms), the higher bedroom count shall be utilized for calculation. The bedroom number selection for payment calculation shall also comply with RMC 4-4-155.D, Number of Bedrooms. 1 This fee shall be $0 for City of Renton Capital Improvement Projects or city funded projects. 4-Bedroom Zip Code 98057 Studio 1-Bedroom 2-Bedroom 3-Bedroom 4-Bedroom Zip Code 98058 Impact Fee Deferral Administration: Each Lot, Single Family Dwelling, or Condominium Each Multi-family Building Affordable Housing Cash Payment in Lieu1,2,3: Zip Code 98055 Studio 1-Bedroom 2-Bedroom 3-Bedroom 4-Bedroom Studio 1-Bedroom 2-Bedroom 3-Bedroom Zip Code 98056 Studio 1-Bedroom 2-Bedroom 3-Bedroom 4-Bedroom Zip Code 98059 1 The cash payment in lieu is calculated by multiplying the fee shown in the table by the number of affordable housing units requested for cash payment in lieu of on-site development. 2 The cash payment in lieu shall be based on the zipcode of the project site. If the project site is located in a zipcode not listed in the table above, the closest abutting zipcode shall be utilized to determine payment calculation. 4-Bedroom Studio 1-Bedroom 2-Bedroom 3-Bedroom 15 City of Renton Fee Schedule 2025-2026 (vii)$200 $200 $300 (ix)WFC Current Wage and Equipment Rate WFC Current Wage and Equipment Rate (x)$25 $25 See Fire plan review and construction permit fees See Fire plan review and construction permit fees $175 $175 $200 5% 5% Min. $75 Min. $75 Min. $100 $250 $250 $325 (xi) (viii) Underground tank removal or abandonment-in- place permit (residential) (vi) (v) Other requested inspection when not required by the fire code, or when requested for after hours inspections. Fee is per hour with a minimum 2 hours when approved by the Fire Marshal, such as home daycares. RFA technology surcharge fee applied to Fire Department Fire Marshal Fees, subsection a. (i, ii, iii, iv, v, vi) and subsection b. (iii) NSF check fees Underground tank removal permit (commercial) Hazardous production materials permit (for businesses storing, handling, or using hazardous production materials as regulated in the fire code) permit is yearly (VIII) Non-emergency Billable Services (ie: boat assists, etc) Rates published at: www.washingtonfirechiefs.com 16 City of Renton Fee Schedule 2025-2026 2025 2026 3. a.RMC 2-9-8.C $73 $73 i. RMC 2-9-8.C.1 $73 $73 ii. RMC 2-9-8.C.2 $73 $73 iii. RMC 2-9-8.C.3 $73 $73 iv. RMC 2-9-8.C.4 $73 $73 v. RMC 2-9-8.C.5 $73 $73 vi. RMC 2-9-8.C.6 $73 $73 vii. RMC 2-9-8.C.7 $73 $73 viii. RMC 2-9-8.C.8 $73 $73 ix. RMC 2-9-8.C.9 $73 $73 x. RMC 2-9-8.C.10 $73 $73 xi. RMC 2-9-8.C.11 $73 $73 xii. RMC 2-9-8.C.12 $73 $73 xiii. RMC 2-9-8.C.13 $73 $73 xiv. RMC 2-9-8.C.14 $73 $73 xv. RMC 2-9-8.C.15 $73 $73 xvi. RMC 2-9-8.C.16 $73 $73 xvii. RMC 2-9-8.C.17 $73 $73 xviii. RMC 2-9-8.C.17 $73 $73 b.RMC 4-5-070.C.102 $49 $49 c.RMC 5-4-1 $49 $49 d.RMC 6-14-22 $50 $50 i. RMC 6-14-3 $50 $50 ii. RMC 6-14-4 $50 $50 iii. RMC 6-14-5 $50 $50 iv. RMC 6-14-6 $50 $50 v. RMC 6-14-7 $50 $50 vi. RMC 6-14-8 $50 $50 vii. RMC 6-14-10 $50 $50 viii. RMC 6-14-11 $50 $50 ix. RMC 6-14-12 $50 $50 x. RMC 6-14-13 $50 $50 xi. RMC 6-14-14 $50 $50 xii. RMC 6-14-15 $50 $50 xiii. RMC 6-14-16 $50 $50 xiv. RMC 6-14-17 $50 $50 xv. RMC 6-14-18 $50 $50 xvi. RMC 6-14-19 $50 $50 xvii. RMC 6-14-20 $50 $50 e.RMC 6-6-1.A $49 $49 f.RMC 6-6-5.A $49 $49 g.RMC 9-17-10 $100 $100 h.RMC 9-3-5 $42 $42 i.RMC 9-3-7 $42 $42 j.RMC 9-3-10 $122 $122 k.RMC 9-3-26 $42 $42 l.RMC 9-3-31 $42 $42 m.RMC 10-12-25 $67 $67 n.RMC 10-12-26 $42 $42 o.RMC 10-12-27 $42 $42 p.RMC 10-12-28.C $42 $42 q.RMC 10-12-28.D $42 $42 r.RMC 10-12-28.E.1 $42 $42 s.RMC 10-12-28.E.2 $42 $42 t.RMC 10-12-28.F $42 $42 u.RMC 10-12-28.G $42 $42 v.RMC 10-12-28.H $42 $42 w.RMC 10-2-5 $47 $47 $48 $48 Effect of Schedule. This schedule establishes default base penalties for violations of the Renton Municipal Code that are issued as infractions under the authority of RCW 7.80 RCW, but these penalties do not include any state-imposed statutory assessments. Except as otherwise prohibited by law or court rule, a court with jurisdiction over the infraction may impose on a defendant a lesser penalty in an individual case. Provided that, whenever the base penalty plus mandatory statutory assessments results in a total payment that is not an even dollar amount, the base penalty is deemed to be amended to a higher amount which produces the next greatest even dollar total. Penalties Established by Court Rule or Specific Penalty Established by Law. This schedule does not apply to penalties established by state or local court rule or to a penalty that is established in law with a specific amount (i.e. ordinance or statute setting a penalty equal to a specified amount rather than a penalty up to a maximum amount). To the extent a penalty scheduled herein conflicts with a state or local court rule or a penalty that is established in law, this schedule shall be deemed preempted by the court rule or penalty established in law. Owner to Maintain Premises Free of Litter Litter of Vacant Lots Unsafe Use of Scooter Prohibiting Distribution of Handbills Where Properly Posted Distributing Handbills at Inhabited Private Premises Dropping Litter from Aircraft Posting Notices Prohibited Litter on Occupied Private Property Truck Loads Causing Litter Litter in Lakes and Fountains Throwing/Distributing Commercial Handbills in Public Places Placing Handbills on Vehicles Depositing Handbills on Uninhabited/Vacant Premises Smoking in Park Operating Scooter When Prohibited Use of Scooter Where Prohibited Use of Scooter Without a Helmet No Reflectors on Scooter No Muffler on Scooter Scooter Operator Under Age 13 Sweeping Litter in Gutters Merchants’ Duty Glass Container in Park with Swimming Area Group Rally/Special Use Permit Parking & Mooring Violation City Events Violation Alcohol in Park SCUBA Diving in Park Camping/Overnight Stay in Parks Metal Detecting Litter in Public Spaces Placement of Litter in Receptacles All other violations identified by Renton Municipal Code as an infraction not listed or otherwise specified by court rule or law. Animal Control – No License Littering Animal Control – Animal at Large Animal Control – Animal/Fowl Habitual Noise Violation of ATV Ordinance Inattentive Driving Truck Route Violation Avoiding Intersection Encroachment on Public Property Negligent Operation of Watercraft Speed Regulations of Watercraft Obstructions of Waterways Equipment Numbering Violation Violation of Rules of the Road Litter Thrown By Persons in Vehicles Violation of Park Rules (Civil Infraction) Possession/Sale/Discharge of Fireworks SECTION XIV. MONETARY PENALTY SCHEDULE FOR INFRACTIONS ISSUED UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF CHAPTER 7.80 RCW Penalties: The following violations shall carry the following listed default base penalty, not including statutory assessments: 1. 2. Fire/Barbeque in Park Activities Prohibited in a Park Disregard Park Trail Sign Unauthorized Vehicle in a Park Operating Motorized Vehicle on Park Trail Dismount Zone Violation Speeding on Trails Vehicle/Boat Repair in Park Racing in Park 17 Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan 2024-2025 through 2030-2031 June 2025 Kent School District No. 415 12033 SE 256th Street Kent, Washington 98030-6643 (253) 373-7526 BOARD of DIRECTORS Ms. Meghin Margel, President Mr. Donald Cook, Vice President Mr. Tim Clark, Legislative Representative Mr. Andy Song, Director Ms. Teresa Gregory, Director ADMINISTRATION Israel Vela Superintendent of Schools Dr. Wade Barringer, Deputy Superintendent Dave Bussard, Executive Director Operations Raul Parungao, Executive Director of Finance Gordon Cook, Director of Facilities Brett Scribner, Assistant Director Capital Projects Exhibit B Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table of Contents I - Executive Summary ................................................................................................. 1 II - Six - Year Enrollment Projection ............................................................................. 4 III - Current Kent School District “Standard of Service" ................................................. 7 Current Standards of Service for Elementary Students ................................................... 7 Current District Standards of Service for Secondary Students ........................................ 8 IV - Inventory and Capacity of Existing Schools ............................................................ 9 V - Six-Year Planning and Construction Plan .............................................................. 14 VI - Portable Classrooms ........................................................................................... 21 VII - Projected Six-Year Classroom Capacity ............................................................... 25 VIII - Finance Plan ..................................................................................................... 30 IX - Summary of Changes to June 2024 Capital Facilities Plan ..................................... 34 X - Appendices .......................................................................................................... 35 I - Executive Summary This Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan has been prepared by the Kent School District as the organization's capital facilities planning document, in compliance with the requirements of Washington's Growth Management Act, King County Code K.C.C. 21A.43 and Cities of Kent, Covington, Renton, Auburn, Black Diamond, Maple Valley, and SeaTac. This annual Plan update was prepared using data available in the spring of 2025 for the 2024-2025 school year. This annual update of the Plan reflects no new major capital projects. This Plan is consistent with prior long-term capital facilities plans adopted by the Kent School District. This Plan is not intended to be the sole planning document for all the District's needs. The District may prepare interim and periodic Long-Range Capital Facilities Plans consistent with Board Policies, considering a longer or shorter period, other factors and trends in the use of facilities, and other needs of the District as may be required. Prior Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent School District have been adopted by Metropolitan King County Council and Cities of Kent, Covington, Auburn, and Renton and included in the Capital Facilities Plan element of the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction. This Plan has also been submitted to the cities of Black Diamond, Maple Valley, and SeaTac for their information and inclusion in their Comprehensive Plans. In order for impact fees to be collected in the unincorporated areas of Kent School District, the Metropolitan King County Council must adopt this Plan and a fee- implementing ordinance for the District. For impact fees to be collected in the incorporated portions of the District, the cities of Kent, Covington, Renton and Auburn must also adopt this Plan and their own school impact fee ordinances. This Capital Facilities Plan establishes a standard of service in order to ascertain current and future capacity. While the State Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, those guidelines do not account for local program needs in the District. The Growth Management Act, King County and City codes and ordinances authorize the District to make adjustments to the standard of service based on specific needs for students of the District. This Plan includes the standard of service as established by Kent School District. Functional capacity is based on an average capacity and updated to reflect changes to special programs served in each building. Portables in the interim capacity calculation use the same standard of service as the permanent facilities. 1 The capacity of each school in the District is calculated based on the District’s standard of service and the existing inventory of permanent facilities. The District's program capacity of permanent facilities reflects program changes and the state’s mandated reduction of class size to meet the standard of service for Kent School District. Portables provide additional interim capacity. Kent School District is the fifth largest (FTE basis) district in the state. Enrollment is electronically reported monthly to the Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction (“OSPI”) on Form P-223. Although funding apportionment is based on Annual Average Full Time Equivalent (AAFTE), enrollment on October 1 is a widely recognized “snapshot in time” that is used to report the District’s enrollment for the year as reported to OSPI (See Table 1). The District's standard of service, enrollment history and projections, and use of interim facilities are reviewed in detail in various sections of this Plan. The District plans to continue to satisfy concurrency requirements through the interim use of portables. This Plan currently represents projects in progress funded primarily by the Kent School District’s 2016 Bond, the 2018 Capital Levy, and our newly passed 2024 Capital and Tech Levy. Additional information about these projects can be found on the District’s capital projects homepage (link). Additionally, project updates sent to our community of stakeholders can be accessed on the KSD website (link). Based on revised student generation rates, our capacity and enrollment projections, the District will stay current with non-collection of student impact fee rate for the coming year. For a short overview, see Section IX (Summary of Changes to the June 2025 Capital Facilities Plan). 2 Description/Year 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 King County Live Births 24,630 25,032 24,910 25,348 25,487 26,011 25,274 24,337 24,090 23,638 Increase/(Decrease)402 (122)438 139 524 (737)(937)(247)(452) Kindergarten/Birth (%)8.3%8.0%8.2%7.8%7.9%6.5%7.3%7.7%7.3%7.7% Source: https://doh.wa.gov/data-and-statistical-reports/washington-tracking-network-wtn/county-all-births-dashboard Grade/Fiscal Year 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 K 2,045 2,013 2,037 1,989 2,010 1,703 1,836 1,874 1,761 1,811 1 2,131 2,067 2,056 2,061 2,036 1,882 1,768 1,945 1,931 1,793 2 2,163 2,163 2,077 2,008 2,091 1,980 1,818 1,840 1,965 1,958 3 2,176 2,195 2,143 2,043 1,995 2,001 1,938 1,887 1,878 1,970 4 2,089 2,195 2,218 2,118 2,038 1,912 1,924 1,953 1,924 1,945 5 1,958 2,103 2,189 2,170 2,120 1,937 1,872 1,953 1,973 1,924 6 2,058 1,952 2,119 2,184 2,164 2,024 1,893 1,962 1,948 1,928 7 1,974 2,021 1,922 2,044 2,166 2,010 1,925 1,906 1,949 1,951 8 2,100 2,021 2,043 1,882 2,073 2,086 1,937 1,956 1,922 1,936 9 2,093 2,105 2,006 2,003 1,888 2,001 2,042 2,010 1,955 1,922 10 2,165 2,099 2,080 1,946 2,034 1,811 1,959 2,048 2,000 1,947 11 1,818 1,865 1,823 1,732 1,663 1,743 1,584 1,679 1,729 1,782 12 1,742 1,730 1,810 1,653 1,634 1,453 1,655 1,467 1,500 1,565 Total Enrollment 26,512 26,529 26,523 25,833 25,912 24,543 24,151 24,480 24,435 24,432 Yearly Increase/ (Decrease)(211)17 (6)(690)79 (1,369)(392)329 (45)(3) Cumulative Increase/ (Decrease)(211)(194)(200)(890)(811)(2,180)(2,572)(2,243)(2,288)(2,291) Source: https://ospi.k12.wa.us/policy-funding/school-apportionment/safs-report (1251H Headcount.pdf) King County Live Births Enrollment KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 ENROLLMENT HISTORY 26,512 26,529 26,523 25,833 25,912 24,543 24,151 24,480 24,435 24,432 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 Enrollment TABLE 1 3 II - Six - Year Enrollment Projection For capital facilities planning, enrollment projections are based on cohort survival and student yield from documented residential construction projected over the next six years (See Table 2). For this Plan, the District used data from OSPI Information and Condition of Schools (ICOS), Report 1049. King County live births and the District's relational percentage average were used to determine the number of kindergartners entering the system (See Table 2). 7.5% of 23,390 King County live births in 2021 is projected for 1,755 students expected in Kindergarten for October 1, 2025. This is a decrease of 248 live births in King County over the previous year. The District’s enrollment from 2025-26 to 2030-31 is projected to decrease by an average of 1.5% each year or a total of 2,089 students. The projected enrollment for 2030-31 is 22,343. Early Childhood Education students (also identified as “ECE”), “Early Childhood Special Education (“ECSE”) students are forecasted and reported to OSPI separately on Form P-223H for Special Education Enrollment. Capacity is reserved to serve students in the ECE programs at elementary schools. Within practical limits, the District has kept abreast of proposed developments. The District will continue to track new development activity to determine impact on schools. Information on new residential developments and the completion of these proposed developments in all jurisdictions will be considered in the District's future analysis of growth projections. The Kent School District serves eight permitting jurisdictions: unincorporated King County, the cities of Kent, Covington, Renton, and Auburn and smaller portions of the cities of SeaTac, Black Diamond, and Maple Valley. 4 STUDENT GENERATION FACTOR "Student Generation Factor" is defined by King County code as "the number derived by a school district to describe how many students of each grade span are expected to be generated by a dwelling unit" based on district records of average actual student generated rates for developments completed within the last ten years. Following these guidelines, the student generation rate for Kent School District is as follows: Single Family Elementary 0.222 Middle 0.092 High 0.116 Total 0.430 Multi-Family Elementary 0.075 Middle 0.030 High 0.032 Total 0.137 The student generation factor is based on 1,927 new SFD (Single Family Detached) units built between 2018 and 2023. The student generation factor is based on 1,908 new MF (Multi- Family) units built during the same period. The multi-family units consisted of 1,590 apartment units and 318 townhome units. The District sees an average of 43 students for every 100 single family units that are built and an average of 14 students for every 100 multi-family units that are built. The rate for apartment units is higher than for townhome units. The rate for apartments can vary, depending on the affordability of the units and the number of bedrooms per unit for specific buildings. Many of the apartment units built between 2018 and 2023 have market rate rents and they tend to have fewer bedrooms per unit than some of the buildings that were completed in 2016 and 2017. The multi-family rate is lower this year than it was in March 2024 because the date range used in the analysis includes fewer affordable units and fewer multiple bedroom units. In preparing the 2024-2025 to 2030-2031 Capital Facilities Plan the District contracted with Educational Data Solutions, LLC led by Dr. Les Kendrick, a noted expert in demographic studies for school districts, to analyze and prepare the student generation factor. 5 Description/Year 2021 2022 2023 2024 (Proj) 2025 (Proj) 2026 (Proj) King County Live Births 23,390 23,012 22,408 22,236 22,065 21,896 Increase/(Decrease)(248)(378)(604)(172)(171)(169) Kindergarten/Birth (%)7.5%7.5%7.6%7.6%7.5%7.5% Grade/Fiscal Year 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31 K 1,755 1,732 1,710 1,687 1,665 1,643 1 1,841 1,784 1,760 1,738 1,714 1,692 2 1,794 1,842 1,785 1,761 1,739 1,715 3 1,956 1,793 1,841 1,784 1,760 1,738 4 1,963 1,949 1,787 1,834 1,778 1,754 5 1,928 1,946 1,932 1,771 1,818 1,762 6 1,906 1,910 1,928 1,914 1,755 1,801 7 1,882 1,861 1,865 1,882 1,868 1,713 8 1,929 1,861 1,840 1,844 1,861 1,847 9 1,930 1,924 1,856 1,835 1,839 1,856 10 1,895 1,902 1,896 1,829 1,808 1,812 11 1,684 1,639 1,645 1,639 1,582 1,563 12 1,631 1,540 1,499 1,504 1,499 1,447 Total Enrollment 24,094 23,683 23,344 23,022 22,686 22,343 Yearly Increase/ (Decrease)(338)(411)(339)(322)(336)(343) Cumulative Increase/ (Decrease)(338)(749)(1,088)(1,410)(1,746)(2,089) Source: School Facilities Organization, Information and Condition of Schools (Report 1049) KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 ENROLLMENT PROJECTION King County Live Births Enrollment Projection Source: https://doh.wa.gov/data-and-statistical-reports/washington-tracking-network-wtn/county-all-births- dashboard TABLE 2 6 III - Current Kent School District “Standard of Service" In order to determine the capacity of facilities in a school district, King County Code 21A.06.1225 references a "standard of service" that each school district must establish to ascertain its overall capacity. The standard of service identifies the program year, the class size, the number of classrooms, students and programs of special need, and other factors determined by the district which would best serve the student population. This Plan includes the standard of service as established by Kent School District. The District has identified schools with significant special needs programs as “impact” schools and the standard of service targets a lower-class size at those facilities. Portables included in the capacity calculation use the same standard of service as the permanent facilities. The standard of service defined herein will continue to evolve in the future. Kent School District is continuing a long-term strategic planning process combined with review of changes to capacity and standard of service. This process will affect various aspects of the District's standard of service and future changes will be reflected in future capital facilities plans. Current Standards of Service for Elementary Students •Class size ratio for grades K - 3 is planned for an average of 24 students per class, not to exceed 26. •Class size ratio for grades 4 - 5 is planned for an average of 27 students per class, not to exceed 29. Some special programs require specialized classroom space and the program capacity of some of the buildings housing these programs is reduced. Some students, for example, leave their regular classroom for a short period of time to receive instruction in special programs and space must be allocated to serve these programs. Students may also be provided with music instruction and physical education in a separate classroom or facility. Some identified students will also be provided educational opportunities in classrooms for special programs such as those designated as follows: Career and Technical Education (CTE) – State Program Closing Educational Achievement Gaps (Title I – Part A) - Federal Program Highly Capable Students (HiCap) - State Program 7 Learning Assistance Program (LAP) – State Program Multilingual Education (MLE) - State Program Inclusive Education Service for Elementary and Secondary students with disabilities may be provided in a separate or self-contained classroom sometimes with a capacity of 10-15 students, depending on the program. Current District Standards of Service for Secondary Students The standards of service outlined below reflect only those programs and educational opportunities provided to secondary students which directly affect the capacity of the school buildings per the negotiated collective bargaining agreement with KEA. •The average class size ratio for grades 6–8 is 28 students per class and 135 students per day, with a maximum daily class load/enrollment of 142 based on five class periods per day. •The average class size ratio for grades 9-12 is 32 students per class and 153 students per day, with a maximum daily class load/enrollment of 160 based on five class periods per day. Like Inclusive Education Programs listed above, many other secondary programs require specialized classroom space which can reduce the functional capacity of the permanent school buildings, such as technology labs, performing arts activities, a variety of career and technical education programs, and other specialized programs. Space or Classroom Utilization As a result of scheduling conflicts for student programs, the need for specialized rooms for certain programs, and the need for teachers to have a workspace during their planning periods, it is not possible to achieve 100% utilization of regular teaching stations at secondary schools. Based on the analysis of actual utilization of classrooms, the Kent School District has determined that the standard utilization rate is 64% for secondary schools. Functional capacity at elementary schools reflects 56% utilization at the elementary level. 8 IV - Inventory and Capacity of Existing Schools Currently, the District has a total functional capacity to house 39,705 students, which consists of a permanent functional capacity of 35,494 and interim (portable) capacity of 4,211. This capacity is based on the District's Standard of Service as set forth in Section III. Included in this Plan is an inventory of the District's schools by type, address and current capacity (See Table 3). The ratio between permanent capacity and portable capacity is 89% - 11%. The functional capacity is periodically updated for changes in the programs, additional classrooms, and new schools. Functional capacity has been updated in this Plan to reflect program changes implemented in the fall of 2024. Calculations of Elementary, Middle School and High School capacities are set forth in Table 3. Maps of existing schools are included. For clarification, the following is a brief description of some of the non-traditional programs for students in Kent School District: iGrad - Kent School District has developed the Individualized Graduation and Degree Program or “iGrad”. iGrad is an Open Door (Drop-out Reengagement) School that offers a second plus chance to students aged 16-21 who have dropped out of high school or are at risk of not earning a high school diploma by age 21. iGrad is not included in this Capital Facilities Plan, because it is served as a leased space at the Kent Hill Plaza Shopping Center. Over the past three years, enrollment in the iGrad program has averaged over 340 students. Kent Virtual Academy - The Kent Virtual Academy is open to grades 6-12 and is currently serving 167 students. The virtual school offers a flexible learning experience designed to engage students when and where they work best. Each school day includes a combination of live (synchronous) virtual instruction and on-demand (asynchronous) learning opportunities outside of a traditional bell schedule. Students can attend live virtual lessons with their teachers and classmates, participate in live virtual class or small group discussions, check-in or meet with teachers, watch recorded video lessons, work independently on projects and lessons, participate in learning experiences outside the school setting for credit or to meet competencies. Virtual school students may also attend their boundary school for select classes and services. 9 Year Opened Carriage Crest Elementary 1990 CC 18235 - 140th Avenue SE, Renton 98058 626 Cedar Valley Elementary 1971 CV 26500 Timberlane Way SE, Covington 98042 541 Covington Elementary 2018 CO 25811 156th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 744 Crestwood Elementary 1980 CW 25225 - 180th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 602 1953 EH 9825 S 240th Street, Kent 98031 779 1999 EP 11800 SE 216th Street, Kent 98031 653 1969 FW 16600 - 148th Avenue SE, Renton 98058 528 East Hill Elementary Emerald Park Elementary Fairwood Elementary George T. Daniel Elementary 1992 DE 11310 SE 248th Street, Kent 98030 640 Glenridge Elementary 1996 GR 19405 - 120th Avenue SE, Renton 98058 591 Grass Lake Elementary 1971 GL 28700 - 191st Place SE, Kent 98042 595 Horizon Elementary 1990 HE 27641 - 144th Avenue SE, Kent 98042 634 Jenkins Creek Elementary 1987 JC 26915 - 186th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 641 Kent Elementary 1999 KE 24700 - 64th Avenue South, Kent 98032 760 Lake Youngs Elementary 1965 LY 19660 - 142nd Avenue SE, Kent 98042 725 Martin Sortun Elementary 1987 MS 12711 SE 248th Street, Kent 98030 768 Meadow Ridge Elementary 1994 MR 27710 - 108th Avenue SE, Kent 98030 706 Meridian Elementary 1939 ME 25621 - 140th Avenue SE, Kent 98042 793 Millennium Elementary 2000 ML 11919 SE 270th Street, Kent 98030 688 Neely-O'Brien Elementary 1990 NO 6300 South 236th Street, Kent 98032 864 Panther Lake Elementary 2009 PL 12022 SE 216th Street, Kent, 98031 744 1963 PO 11010 SE 232nd Street, Kent 98031 728 1967 PT 27825 - 118th Avenue SE, Kent 98030 732 1987 RW 18030 - 162nd Place SE, Renton 98058 661 2021 RR 22420 Military Rd. S., SeaTac, WA 98198 886 Park Orchard Elementary Pine Tree Elementary Ridgewood Elementary River Ridge Elementary Sawyer Woods Elementary 1994 SW 31135 - 228th Ave SE, Black Diamond 98010 549 1960 SH 837 1971 SC 591 1969 SB 730 1992 SR 719 20,055 1966 CR 1,110 1993 CH 1,140 1981 MA 1,020 1970 MK 1,230 1958 MM 1,110 2005 MC 1,200 Scenic Hill Elementary Soos Creek Elementary Springbrook Elementary Sunrise Elementary Elementary TOTAL 1996 NW 1,140 7,950 1951 KM 2,595 1997 KL 2,714 1968 KR 2,932 1981 KW 2,917 11,158 2021 KLA 542 Canyon Ridge Middle Cedar Heights Middle Mattson Middle Meeker Middle Meridian Middle Mill Creek Middle Northwood Middle Middle TOTAL Kent-Meridian High Kentlake High Kentridge High Kentwood High High TOTAL Kent Laboratory Academy DISTRICT TOTAL 39,705 2024-2025 Functional SCHOOL ABR ADDRESS 26025 Woodland Way South, Kent 98030 12651 SE 218th Place, Kent 98031 20035 - 100th Avenue SE, Kent 98031 22300 - 132nd Avenue SE, Kent 98042 11000 SE 264th Street, Kent 98030 19640 SE 272nd Street, Covington 98042 16400 SE 251st Street, Covington 98042 12600 SE 192nd Street, Renton 98058 23480 - 120th Avenue SE, Kent 98031 620 North Central Avenue, Kent 98032 17007 SE 184th Street, Renton 98058 10020 SE 256th Street, Kent 98030 21401 SE 300th Street, Kent 98042 12430 SE 208th Street, Kent 98031 25800 - 164th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 105 SE 208th St., Kent, WA 98031 Table 3 10 Kent-Meridian High School Kentlake High School Kentridge High School Kentwood High School King County, WA State Parks GIS, Esri, HERE, Garmin, SafeGraph, METI/NASA, USGS, Bureau of Land Management, EPA, NPS, USDA Kent School District 2024/2025 School Year High School Boundaries Legend High School Buildings Kent-Meridian High School Kentlake High School Kentridge High School Kentwood High School ± 0 4 82 Miles 11 Cedar Heights Mattson Meeker MeridianMill Creek Northwood Canyon Ridge King County, WA State Parks GIS, Esri, HERE, Garmin, SafeGraph, METI/NASA, USGS, Bureau of Land Management, EPA, NPS, USDA Middle Schools Cedar Heights Middle School Canyon Ridge Middle School Mattson Middle School Meeker Middle School Meridian Middle School Mill Creek Middle School Northwood Middle School Kent School District 2024/2025 School Year Middle School Boundaries 0 3.75 7.51.88 Miles Ü 12 Carriage Crest Cedar ValleyCovington Crestwood East Hill Emerald Park Fairwood George T. Daniel Glenridge Grass Lake Horizon Jenkins Creek Kent Lake Youngs Martin Sortun Meadow Ridge Meridian Millennium Neely O Brien Panther Lake Park Orchard Pine Tree Ridgewood Sawyer Woods Scenic Hill Soos Creek Springbrook Sunrise River Ridge King County, WA State Parks GIS, Esri, HERE, Garmin, SafeGraph, METI/NASA, USGS, Bureau of Land Management, EPA, NPS, USDA Carriage Crest Elementary Cedar Valley Elementary Covington Elementary Crestwood Elementary Daniel Elementary East Hill Elementary Emerald Park Elementary Fairwood Elementary Glenridge Elementary Grass Lake Elementary Horizon Elementary Jenkins Creek Elementary Kent Elementary Lake Youngs Elementary Martin Sortun Elementary Meadow Ridge Elementary Meridian Elementary Millennium Elementary Neely O Brien Elementary Panther Lake Elementary Park Orchard Elementary Pine Tree Elementary Ridgewood Elementary River Ridge Elementary Sawyer Woods Elementary Scenic Hill Elementary Soos Creek Elementary Springbrook Elementary Sunrise Elementary Elementary Schools Kent School District 2024/2025 School Year Elementary School Boundaries 0 3.75 7.51.88 Miles Ü 13 V - Six-Year Planning and Construction Plan In November 2016, the voters of the Kent School District approved a bond measure for $252 million. This bonding authority provided for the replacement of Covington Elementary school, which opened in August of 2018, the new River Ridge Elementary school, and our new Kent Laboratory Academy, which both opened in August 2021. As a critical component of capital facilities planning, county and city planners and decision- makers are encouraged to consider safe walking conditions for all students when reviewing applications and design plans for new roads and developments. This should include sidewalks for pedestrian safety to and from schools and bus stops, as well as bus pull-outs and turn- arounds. Included in this Plan is an inventory of potential projects and sites identified by the District which are potentially acceptable site alternatives in the future (See Table 4 & Sitemap). Voter approved bond issues have included funding for the purchase of sites for future schools and district use; the sites acquired to date are included in this Plan. Some funding is secured for the purchase of additional sites but may also be funded with impact fees as needed. Not all undeveloped properties meet current school construction requirements, and some property may be traded or sold to meet future facility needs. The Board will continue an annual review of standards of service and those decisions will be reflected in each update of the Capital Facilities Plan. The Kent School District continues to make improvements to the facilities through completion of the 2016 Bond, 2018 Levy, and the recent voter approved 2024 Levy. At this moment the standing of the current measures are as follows: Measure Complete In Progress Not Started 2016 Bond 85% 13% 2% 2018 Levy 72% 13% 15% 2024 Levy 0% 14% 86% The Kent School District anticipates and is planning to run a Bond in 2028 for additional emergent needs, differed maintenance, tenant improvement projects, and possible facility replacement. As a part of the planning process, the District has been tracking a few major development projects which have affected enrollment and will continue to increase students' forecasts. On Meeker Street in Kent, we have seen several major apartment complexes, ETHOS and Midtown 64 Apartments. These continue to have an impact on enrollment as they fill up their newly built facilities. The Alexian Gateway Project is located on the corner of Military Road 14 and Veterans Drive in Kent and began occupying its 283 units in 2023-2024. In Covington, we are tracking a multi-family house development which has been approved and construction has begun. The 1700-unit Lakepointe Urban Community will fall within our enrollment boundary and proposed completion of Phase 4 is shown to be 2027. Construction in the Kent School District boundaries have been steadily rising over the last five years and planned communities are now being recognized through the planning teams in multiple city and county jurisdictions we serve. 15 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 Site Acquisitions and Projects Planned to Provide Additional Capacity Projected Projected % for SCHOOL / FACILITY / SITE LOCATION Type Status Completion Program new Date Capacity Growth Approximate Approximate # on Map ELEMENTARY MIDDLE & HIGH TEMPORARY FACILITIES Additional Capacity # on Map 2 OTHER SITES ACQUIRED Land Use Designation Type 16 White House - Kent 11027 SE Kent-Kangley Kent, WA 98030 Commercial Purchased 16a Green Building - Kent 11109 SE Kent-Kangley Kent, WA 98030 Commercial Purchased Notes: None King County Land Use Jurisdiction King County Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 4 May 2022 16 © copyright KROLL MAP COMPANY, INC. This map has been modified by KSD 05/22 Sawyer Woods Elementary Jenkins Creek Elementary Fairwood Elementary Ridgewood Elementary Northwood Middle School Lake Youngs Elementary Glenridge Elementary Kentridge High School Springbrook Elementary Soos Creek Elementary Sunrise Elementary Meridian Middle School Kentwood High School Park Orchard Elementary Martin Sortun Elementary Daniel Elementary East Hill Elementary Mill Creek Middle School Kent Elementary Kent-Meridian High School Scenic Hill Elementary Kent School District Administration Center Meadow Ridge Elementary Pine Tree Elementary Horizon Elementary Covington Elementary Cedar Heights Middle School Cedar Valley Elementary Crestwood Elementary Mattson Middle School Kentlake High School Neely O’Brien Elementary Carriage Crest Elementary MeridianElementary Meeker Middle School Grass Lake Elementary Emerald Park Elementary Millennium Elementary iGrad Kent Valley Early Learning Center The Outreach Program (TOP) Panther Lake Elementary River Ridge Elementary Kent Laboratory Academy 17 cccc cc ccc cc c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c V E T E R A N S D R I V E O L D M I L I T A R Y R O A D S O U T H AMENITY SPACE TRASH ENCLOSURES TRASH ENCLOSURES TRASH ENCLOSURES TRASH ENCLOSURES TRASH ENCLOSURES 2 1 0 1 2 2 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 4 0 1 2 1 0 4 2 2 0 4 2 3 0 4 2 4 0 4 2 1 0 5 2 2 0 5 2 3 0 5 2 4 0 5 2 1 0 8 2 2 0 8 2 3 0 8 2 4 0 8 2 1 0 9 2 2 0 9 2 3 0 9 2 4 0 9 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 2 3 1 2 2 4 1 2 2 1 1 3 2 2 1 3 2 3 1 3 2 4 1 3 2 1 1 6 2 2 1 6 2 3 1 6 2 4 1 6 2 1 0 2 2 2 0 2 2 3 0 2 2 4 0 2 2 1 0 3 2 2 0 3 2 3 0 3 2 4 0 3 ------ 2 2 0 6 2 3 0 6 2 4 0 6 ------ 2 2 0 7 2 3 0 7 2 4 0 7 ------ 2 2 1 0 2 3 1 0 2 4 1 0 ------ 2 2 1 1 2 3 1 1 2 4 1 1 ------ 2 2 1 4 2 3 1 4 2 4 1 4 ------ 2 2 1 5 2 3 1 5 2 4 1 5 MAINTENANCE SHED M001 1. UNIT NUMBERS READ TOP TO BOTTOM (FLOOR 1-4) AS INDICATED ON THE UNIT STACK ONE BEDROOM UNITS TWO BEDROOM UNITS THREE BEDROOM UNITS LEGEND 3102 3202 3302 3402 3101 3201 3301 3401 3103 3203 3303 3403 3104 3204 3304 3404 3106 3206 3306 3406 3105 3205 3305 3405 3107 3207 3307 3407 3108 3208 3308 3408 3110 3210 3310 3410 3109 3209 3309 3409 3112 3212 3312 3412 3114 3214 3314 3414 3111 3211 3311 3411 3101 3201 3301 3401 TYPE A UNITS 3115 3215 3315 3415 3116 3216 3316 3416 ------ 3217 3317 3417 3118 3218 3318 3418 3119 3219 3319 3419 ------ 3220 3320 3420 ------ 3221 3321 3421 3122 3222 3322 3422 3123 3223 3323 3423 ------ 3224 3324 3424 1 1 0 5 1 2 0 5 1 3 0 5 1 4 0 5 NO UNIT - GARAGE ONLY----- * * * * * * *BUILDING SIGNAGE ------ 1 2 0 4 1 3 0 4 1 4 0 4 ------ 1 2 0 1 1 3 0 1 ------ ------ ------ 1 3 0 2 ------ ------ 1 2 0 3 1 3 0 3 1 4 0 3 1 1 0 6 1 2 0 6 1 3 0 6 1 4 0 6 1 1 0 7 1 2 0 7 1 3 0 7 1 4 0 7 1 1 1 0 1 2 1 0 1 3 1 0 1 4 1 0 1 1 0 8 1 2 0 8 1 3 0 8 1 4 0 8 1 1 0 9 1 2 0 9 1 3 0 9 1 4 0 9 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 3 1 2 1 4 1 2 1 1 1 5 1 2 1 5 1 3 1 5 1 4 1 5 1 1 1 6 1 2 1 6 1 3 1 6 1 4 1 6 1 1 1 7 1 2 1 7 1 3 1 7 1 4 1 7 ------ 1 2 1 8 1 3 1 8 1 4 1 8 ------ 1 2 1 5 1 3 1 5 1 4 1 5 ------ 1 2 1 4 1 3 1 4 1 4 1 4 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 4 1 1 1 1 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 3 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 3 2 1 1 4 2 1 1 1 2 4 1 2 2 4 1 3 2 4 1 4 2 4 1 1 2 5 1 2 2 5 1 3 2 5 1 4 2 5 1 1 2 8 1 2 2 8 1 3 2 8 1 4 2 8 1 1 2 9 1 2 2 9 1 3 2 9 1 4 2 9 1 1 3 2 1 2 3 2 1 3 3 2 1 4 3 2 1 1 3 3 1 2 3 3 1 3 3 3 1 4 3 3 1 1 3 6 1 2 3 6 1 3 3 6 1 4 3 6 1 1 3 7 1 2 3 7 1 3 3 7 1 4 3 7 ------ 1 2 1 9 1 3 1 9 1 4 1 9 ------ 1 2 2 2 1 3 2 2 1 4 2 2 ------ 1 2 2 3 1 3 2 3 1 4 2 3 ------ 1 2 2 6 1 3 2 6 1 4 2 6 ------ 1 2 2 7 1 3 2 7 1 4 2 7 ------ 1 2 3 0 1 3 3 0 1 4 3 0 ------ 1 2 3 1 1 3 3 1 1 4 3 1 ------ 1 2 3 4 1 3 3 4 1 4 3 4 ------ 1 2 3 5 1 3 3 5 1 4 3 5 1 1 3 8 1 2 3 8 1 3 3 8 1 4 3 8 APARTMENT PROJECTS WITH MULTIPLE BUILDINGS SHALL HAVE MONUMENT SIGNS ------- SHOWING THE STREET ADDRESSES OF EACH BUILDING AT EACH VEHICLE ENTRANCE TO THE SITE. EACH ETHICAL ENTRANCE SHALL ALSO HAVE AN ILLUMINATED SITE PLAN AND / OR DIRECTLY SIGNS. THE SIGNS SHALL SHOW THE LOCATION OF THE SIGN (THE VIEWER'S CURRENT LOCATION) AND ALL BUILDING ADDRESSES. DWELLING NUMBERS SHALL BE INCLUDED. THE MONUMENT SIGNS SHALL HAVE A CONTRASTING BACKGROUND COLOR. ALL SITE SIGNAGE TO BE PER OWNERS SPECIFICATION AND DESIGN AND UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT. * INDICATE APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF ILLUMINATED BUILDING ADDRESS SIGNAGE. SIGNAGE FOR BUILDINGS MUST INCLUDE THE ENTIRE BUILDING ADDRESS AND STREET NAME. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE NO LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT. THE BUILDING SIGN SHALL HAVE A CONTRASTING BACKGROUND COLOR. 542 1st AVE. SOUTH, FLOOR 4 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104 © 2019 KATERRA ARCHITECTURE LLC © 2019 KATERRA ARCHITECTURE II LLC © 2019 KATERRA ARCHITECTURE III PLLC © 2019 KATERRA ARCHITECTURE IV LLC ALL DRAWINGS, SPECIFICATIONS, PLANS, IDEAS, ARRANGEMENTS AND DESIGNS REPRESENTED OR REFERRED TO ARE THE PROPERTY OF AND ARE OWNED BY KATERRA INC. WHETHER THE PROJECT FOR WHICH THEY ARE MADE IS EXECUTED OR NOT. THEY WERE CREATED, EVOLVED, DEVELOPED AND PRODUCED FOR THE SOLE USE ON AND IN CONNECTION WITH THIS PROJECT AND NONE OF THE ABOVE MAY BE DISCLOSED OR GIVEN TO OR USED BY ANY PERSON, FIRM OR CORPORATION FOR ANY USE OR PURPOSE WHATSOEVER INCLUDING ANY OTHER PROJECT, EXCEPT UPON WRITTEN PERMISSION AND DIRECTION OF KATERRA INC. Owner Consultant BLDG. 1 BLDG. 2 BLDG. 3 Key plan Revisions Mark Date Description N 10/30/2020 UNIT NUMBERING/ ADDRESSING SHEET(1,2,3) G.00.014 ALEXAN GATEWAY APARTMENTS 23000 MILITARY RD S, KENT, WA 98032 RM RM 075-18001 12/13/19 IFC SET Drawn By Project Manager Job Number Date Of Original Professional Seal SCALE: 3/64" = 1'-0"1 UNIT NUMBERING PLAN NORTH 0 06/12/2019 PERMIT SET 2 01/09/2020 REV.3 ITCD UPDATES 6 05/22/2020 PC1 CORRECTIONS ''18 Phase 1B Phase 2 Phase 3 SE 260th St 18 9 t h A v e S E 1 8 8 t h A v e S E 19 1 s t P l S E SE 259th Pl 19 3 r d P l S E 19 6 t h A v e S E SE 2 5 9 t h S t SE 2 6 0 t h S t 19 9 t h A v e S E S E T i m b e r l a n e B l v d 198th Pl SE SE 2 5 6 t h S t SR 1 8 20 4 t h A v e S E 201s t A v e S E S E 2 5 8 t h S t 20 3 r d A v e S E S E 2 5 8 t h P l Phase 4 Phase 1A Phasing Legend Phasing MapLakepointe Urban Village Phasing MapLakepointe Urban Village 200 400 400' 0 100 SCALE: 1" = N NOTE: THE LOCATION OF DEVELOPMENT, INCLUDINGS ROADWAYS AND TRAILS, IS APPROXIMATE AND DOES NOT VEST TO THIER SPECIFIC LOCATION. THE LOCATION OF ALL DEVELOPMENT WILL BE BASED ON EXISTING CONDITIONS AT THE TIME OF APPLICATION AND THE TERMS OF THE PLANNED ACTION, THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, AND APPLICABLE LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL LAWS. January 30, 2017 Phase 1B - Approximate Years 2019-2024 Phase 2 - Approximate Years 2020-2025 Phase 3 - Approximate Years 2023-2028 Establishment of final grade, construction of Covington Connector to Southeast boundary, construction of first phase of commercial development. Establishment of final lake perimeter, construction of 191st Place SE extension and associated R-12 residential development, construction of second phase of commercial development on peninsula. Construction of third phase of commercial development. Preliminary Plat approval in third quarter 2021. Construction and Final Plat Recording 2022. Phase 1A - Maple Hills Division 5 Phase 4 - Approximate Years 2020-2027 Completion of gravel pit reclamation, construction of MR and R-12 residential development Updated September 15, 2021 11 9 10 8 8 19 1 9 1 s t P l S E Jenkins Creek SE 260th St 18 9 t h A v e S E 1 8 8 t h A v e S E 19 1 s t P l S E SE 259th Pl 193 r d P l S E 19 6 t h A v e S E SE 2 5 9 t h S t SE 2 6 0 t h S t 19 9 t h A v e S E S E T i m b e r l a n e B l v d 198th Pl SE SE 2 5 6 t h S t SR 1 8 20 4 t h A v e S E 201s t A v e S E S E 2 5 8 t h S t 20 3 r d A v e S E S E 2 5 8 t h P l B RCMU PARKS 24,956 SF 0.57 AC RCMU PARKS 97,621 SF 2.24 AC MR PARKS 110,686 SF 2.54 AC R-12 PARKS 14,185 SF 0.33 AC R-12 PARKS 12,500 SF 0.29 AC MR PARKS 128,425 SF 2.95 AC R-12 PARKS 32,553 SF 0.75 AC R-6 PARKS 14,112 SF 0.32 AC R-12 PARKS 7,254 SF 0.17 AC R-6 OPEN SPACE 1,880,037 SF 43.16 AC R-12 OPEN SPACE 572,210 SF 13.14 AC R-12 OPEN SPACE 4,549 SF 0.10 AC R-12 OPEN SPACE 34,788 SF 0.80 AC RCMU OPEN SPACE 86,894 SF 1.99 AC R-6 PARKS 9,908 SF 0.23 AC MR PARKS 12,799 SF 0.29 AC MR OPEN SPACE 22,507 SF 0.52 AC R-12 OPEN SPACE 5,687 SF 0.13 AC R-6 OPEN SPACE 139,837 SF 3.21 AC R-6 OPEN SPACE 57,182 SF 1.31 AC P Covi n g t o n C o n n e c t o r Master Development PlanLakepointe Urban Village Master Development PlanLakepointe Urban Village January 30, 2017 Wetland Wetland Buffer Undisturbed Open Space Publicly Accessible Parks and Plazas Medium Density Residential (R-6) Central Pond Feature Covington Highlands Trail Trails / Offsite Trail Connections Stop Light Proposed Park and Ride Facility Transit Stop Proposed Truck and Bus Return Route Public Streets High Density Residential (R-12) Mixed Residential (MR) Mixed Use / Commercial (RCMU) Legend B Bike Route CENTRAL POND FEATURE Gateway Element Steep Slope and Buffer 200 400 400' 0 100 SCALE: 1" = N Proposed Trail Parking Focal Point / Public Gathering Spot Landscape Areas Jenkins Creek P Pedestrian / Wildlife Undercrossing NOTE: THE LOCATION OF DEVELOPMENT, INCLUDINGS ROADWAYS AND TRAILS, IS APPROXIMATE AND DOES NOT VEST TO THIER SPECIFIC LOCATION. THE LOCATION OF ALL DEVELOPMENT WILL BE BASED ON EXISTING CONDITIONS AT THE TIME OF APPLICATION AND THE TERMS OF THE PLANNED ACTION, THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, AND APPLICABLE LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL LAWS. Mix of Multi-Family and Commercial is Encouraged within Peninsula Area Updated September 15, 2021 Disturbed (Graded) Open Space SPECIAL PAVEMENT PARKS TABLE RCMU MR R-12 R-6 ZONE SQ FOOTAGE ACREAGE 122,577 SF 251,910 SF 66,492 SF 24,020 SF 2.81 AC 5.78 AC 1.53 AC 0.55 AC TOTAL 464,999 SF 10.67 AC POND TABLE RCMU MR R-12 R-6 ZONE SQ FOOTAGE ACREAGE 366,128 SF 106,040 SF 334,094 SF 0 SF 8.41 AC 2.43 AC 7.67 AC 0.00 AC TOTAL 806,262 SF 18.51 AC OPEN SPACE TABLE RCMU MR R-12 R-6 ZONE SQ FOOTAGE ACREAGE 86,984 SF 22,507 SF 617,234 SF 2,077,056 SF 1.99 AC 0.52 AC 14.17 AC 47.68 AC TOTAL 2,803,691 SF 64.36 AC COMBINED OPEN SPACE TABLE RCMU MR R-12 R-6 ZONE PARKS 2.81 AC 5.78 AC 1.53 AC 0.55 AC TOTAL 10.67 AC 91.25 AC 34.00 AC 35.34 AC 53.51 AC 214.10 AC OPEN SPACE* POND 8.41 AC 2.43 AC 7.67 AC 0.00 AC 18.51 AC *OPEN SPACE INCLUDES CRITICAL AREAS, BUFFERS, AND OTHER GREEN SPACES 13.21 AC 8.73 AC 23.37 AC 48.23 AC 93.55 AC NET ACRES** 78.03 AC 25.27 AC 11.98 AC 5.27 AC 120.55 AC 1.99 AC 0.52 AC 14.17 AC 47.68 AC 64.36 AC GROSS ACREAGE TOTAL AMENITIES WILDLIFE / PEDESTRIAN UNDER-CROSSING **NET ACRES EQUALS GROSS ACREAGE MINUS TOTAL AMENITIES FUTURE CONNECTION BEYOND PROPERTY BY OTHERS 3 6 4 6 1 2 5 7 20 VI - Portable Classrooms The Plan references use of portables as interim capacity for facilities. Currently, the District utilizes portables to house students in excess of functional capacity and for program purposes at some school locations (Please see Appendices A, B, C). Based on enrollment projections, implementation of full day kindergarten programs, lower state mandated class sizes, functional capacity, and no need for additional interim capacity, the District anticipates no need to purchase or lease additional portables during the next six- year period to ensure capacity requirement (Noted in section V. Six Yr. Planning Construction). During the time period covered by this Plan, the District does not anticipate that all of the District’s portables will be replaced by permanent facilities. During the useful life of some of the portables, the school-age population may decline in some communities and increase in others, and these portables provide the flexibility to accommodate the immediate needs of the community. Portables may be used as interim facilities: 1.To prevent overbuilding or overcrowding of permanent school facilities. 2.To cover the gap between the times of demand for increased capacity and completion of permanent school facilities to meet that demand. 3.To meet unique program requirements. Portables currently in the District’s inventory are continually evaluated and maintained. The District's goal is to reduce the number of portables so we may provide an equitable learning environment for all. The Plan projects that the District will use portables to accommodate interim housing needs for the next six years and beyond. The use of portables, their impacts on permanent facilities, life cycle and operational costs, and the interrelationship between portables, emerging technologies, and educational restructuring will continue to be examined. 21 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT FACTORS FOR ESTIMATED IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS Student Generation Factors - Single Family Student Generation Factors - Multi-Family Elementary (Grades K - 5)0.222 Elementary (Grades K - 5)0.075 Middle (Grades 6- 8)0.092 Middle (Grades 6- 8)0.030 Senior High (Grades 9 - 12)0.116 Senior High (Grades 9 - 12)0.032 Total 0.430 Total 0.137 Projected Increased Student Capacity OSPI - Square Footage per Student Elementary 0 Elementary 110 Middle 0 Middle 134 Senior High (Academy)0 Senior High 144 Special Education 153 Required Site Acreage per Facility Elementary (required)12 Average Site Cost / Acre Middle (required)25 Elementary $161,678 Senior High (required)40 Middle $0 Senior High $0 $68,000,000 Temporary Facility Capacity & Cost $155,000,000 Elementary @ 24 $315,000 $220,000,000 Middle @ 28 $315,000 Senior High @ 32 $315,000 State Funding Assistance Credit 123,702 District Funding Assistance Percentage 54.31% 10,256 21,296 155,254 Construction Cost Allocation CCA - Cost/Sq, Ft. $375.00 1,567,594 760,483 District Average Assessed Value 1,077,315 Single Family Residence $657,970 3,405,392 District Average Assessed Value 1,691,296 Multi-Family Residence $320,116 770,739 New Facility Construction Cost Elementary Middle Senior High Temporary Facility Square Footage Elementary Middle Senior High Total 4.4% Permanent Facility Square Footage Elementary Middle Senior High/Other Total 95.6% Total Facilities Square Footage Elementary Middle Senior High/Other 1,098,611 Total 3,560,646 Bond Levy Tax Rate/$1,000 $0.46 Current Rate / 1,000 Tax Rate 0.0005 Developer Provided Sites / Facilities Value 0 General Obligation Bond Interest Rate Dwelling Units 0 Current Bond Interest Rate 4.37% CPI Inflation Factor 5.80% Budget Preparations | OSPI (www.k12.wa.us) * Reflects current facility construction (APPENDIX A) 22 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT FACTORS FOR ESTIMATED IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS Site Acquisition Cost per Single Family Residence Formula: ((Acres x Cost per Acre) / Facility Capacity) x Student Generation Factor Required Site Acreage Average Site Cost/Acre Facility Capacity Student Factor A 1 (Elementary)12 $161,678 0 0.222 A 2 (Middle)25 $0 0 0.092 A 3 (Senior High)40 $0 0 0.116 Total 77 $161,678 0 0.430 A a $0.00 Permanent Facility Construction Cost per Single Family Residence Formula: ((Facility Cost / Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Permanent/Total Square Footage Ratio) Construction Cost Facility Capacity Student Factor Footage Ratio B 1 (Elementary)$68,000,000 0 0.222 0.903 B 2 (Middle)$155,000,000 0 0.092 0.984 B 3 (Senior High)$220,000,000 0 0.116 0.998 Total $443,000,000 0 0.430 B a $0.00 Temporary Facility Cost per Single Family Residence (Portables) Formula: ((Facility Cost / Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Temporary / Total Square Footage Ratio) Facility Cost Facility Capacity Student Factor Footage Ratio C 1 (Elementary)$315,000 24 0.222 0.097 $282.63 C 2 (Middle)$315,000 28 0.092 0.016 $15.99 C 3 (Senior High)$315,000 32 0.116 0.020 $23.57 Total $945,000 84 0.430 C a $322.20 State Funding Assistance Credit per Single Family Residence (formerly "State Match") Formula: Area Cost Allowance x SPI Square Feet per student x Funding Assistance % x Student Factor Construction Cost AllocationSPI Sq. Ft. / Student Assistance %Student Factor D 1 (Elementary)$375.00 110 0.5431 0.222 $4,973.44 D 2 (Middle)$375.00 134 0.5431 0.092 $2,510.75 D 3 (Senior High)$375.00 144 0.5431 0.116 $3,401.98 D a $10,886.17 Tax Credit per Single Family Residence Average SF Residential Assessed Value (AAV)$657,970 Net Present Value (per EQ) (NPV)8.32 Current Debt Service Rate / 1,000 ( r )0.05%TC a $2,534.98 (Below used to calculate NPV) Current Bond Interest Rate 4.37% Years Amortized (10 Years)- Used in NPV Calculation 10 Developer Provided Facility Credit Facility / Site Value Dwelling Units 0 0 FC a 0 Fee Recap ** A = Site Acquisition per SF Residence $0.00 B = Permanent Facility Cost per Residence $0.00 C = Temporary Facility Cost per Residence $322.20 Subtotal $322.20 D = State Match Credit per Residence $10,886.17 TC = Tax Credit per Residence $2,534.98 Subtotal $13,421.15 Total Unfunded Need ($13,098.95) 50% Developer Fee Obligation ($6,549) FC = Facility Credit (if applicable)$0 District Adjustment $6,549 Net Fee Obligation per Residence - Single Family $0.00 (APPENDIX B) 23 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT FACTORS FOR ESTIMATED IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS Site Acquisition Cost per Multi-Family Residence Unit Formula: ((Acres x Cost per Acre) / Facility Capacity) x Student Generation Factor Required Site Acreage Average Site Cost/Acre Facility Capacity Student Factor A 1 (Elementary)12 $161,678 0 0.075 A 2 (Middle)25 $0 0 0.030 A 3 (Senior High)40 $0 0 0.032 Total 77 $161,678 0 0.137 2 A $0.00 Permanent Facility Construction Cost per Multi-Family Residence Unit Formula: ((Facility Cost / Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Permanent / Total Square Footage Ratio) Construction Cost Facility Capacity Student Factor Footage Ratio B 1 (Elementary)$68,000,000 0 0.075 0.903 B 2 (Middle)$155,000,000 0 0.030 0.984 B 3 (Senior High)$220,000,000 0 0.032 0.998 Total $443,000,000 0 0.137 B $0.00 Temporary Facility Cost per Multi-Family Residence Unit Formula: ((Facility Cost / Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Temporary / Total Square Footage Ratio) Facility Cost Facility Capacity Student Factor Footage Ratio C 1 (Elementary)$315,000 24 0.075 0.097 $95.48 C 2 (Middle)$315,000 28 0.030 0.016 $5.21 C 3 (Senior High)$315,000 32 0.032 0.020 $6.50 Total $945,000 84 0.137 C $107.20 State Funding Assistance Credit per Multi-Family Residence (formerly "State Match") Formula: Area Cost Allowance x SPI Square Feet per student x Funding Assistance % x Student Factor Area Cost Allowance SPI Sq. Ft. / Student Equalization %Student Factor D 1 (Elementary)$375.00 110 0.5431 0.075 $1,680.22 D 2 (Middle)$375.00 134 0.5431 0.030 $818.72 D 3 (Senior High)$375.00 144 0.5431 0.032 $938.48 D $3,437.42 Tax Credit per Multi Family Residence Average MF Residential Assessed Value (AAV)$320,116 Net Present Value (per EQ) (NPV)8.32 Current Debt Service Rate / 1,000 ( r )0.05%TC $1,233.32 (Below used to calculate NPV) Current Bond Interest Rate 4.37% Years Amortized (10 Years)- Used in NPV Calcula 10 Developer Provided Facility Credit Facility / Site Value Dwelling Units 0 0 FC 0 Fee Recap ** A = Site Acquisition per Multi-Family Unit $0.00 B = Permanent Facility Cost per MF Unit $0.00 C = Temporary Facility Cost per MF Unit $107.20 Subtotal $107.20 D = State Match Credit per MF Unit $3,437.42 TC = Tax Credit per MF Unit $1,233.32 Subtotal $4,670.73 Total Unfunded Need ($4,563.53) 50% Developer Fee Obligation ($2,282) FC = Facility Credit (if applicable)0 District Adjustment $2,282 Net Fee Obligation per Residential Unit - Multi-family $0.00 (APPENDIX C) 24 VII - Projected Six-Year Classroom Capacity As stated in Section IV, the functional capacity study is periodically updated for changes in special programs and reflects class size requirements, class size fluctuations etc. As shown in the Inventory and Capacity chart in Table 3, the functional capacity is also reflected in the capacity and enrollment comparison charts (See Tables 5 & 5 a-b-c). Enrollment is electronically reported to OSPI on Form P-223 on a monthly basis and funding apportionment is based on Annual Average FTE (AAFTE). The first school day of October is widely recognized as the enrollment “snapshot in time” to report enrollment for the year. Kent School District continues to be the fifth largest district (both FTE and headcount basis) in the State of Washington. The P-223 Headcount for October 2024 was 24,432, excluding ECSE and college-only Running Start students. In October 2024, there were 1,159 students in 11th and 12th grade participating in the Running Start program at different colleges and receiving credits toward both high school and college graduation. Of these students, 629 attended classes only at the college (“college-only”) and are excluded from FTE and headcount for capacity and enrollment comparisons. Kent School District has one of the highest Running Start program participation rates in the State. Based on the enrollment forecasts, permanent facility inventory and capacity, current standard of service, portable capacity, and future additional classroom space, the District plans to continue to satisfy the required capacity through the interim use of portables (See Table 5 and Tables 5 a-b-c). While the District currently shows available capacity to address projected need on a purely statistical basis, there are a variety of extenuating factors that need to be considered. The Kent School District currently makes significant use of portables, which we do not consider as part of our permanent standard of service. We have included portable space in our interim capacity figures, and we do not count that as a permanent space solution. Kent School District is unusual in that it incorporates neighborhoods intersecting with 8 jurisdictions, including Kent, Covington, Auburn, Black Diamond, Maple Valley, Renton, unincorporated King County and SeaTac. The district covers 72 square miles and includes over 40 schools. Within this large geographic area, we expect to have pockets of localized capacity need that are not necessarily reflected in the aggregate figures. As one example, the Lakepointe Urban Village development in Covington may require new classroom capacity even as space may exist in schools on the far other end of the District’s boundaries. 25 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY TOTAL DISTRICT SCHOOL YEAR 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31 Actual Permanent Functional Capacity 1 35,494 35,494 35,494 35,494 35,494 35,494 35,494 Changes to Permanent Capacity 1 Capacity Increase (F) Additional Permanent Classrooms 0000000 Permanent Program Capacity Subtotal 35,494 35,494 35,494 35,494 35,494 35,494 35,494 Interim Portable Capacity Elementary Portable Capacity Required 3,228 3,228 3,228 3,228 3,228 3,228 3,228 Middle School Portable Capacity Required 375 375 375 375 375 375 375 High School Portable Capacity Required 608 608 608 608 608 608 608 Interim Portable Capacity Total 4,211 4,211 4,211 4,211 4,211 4,211 4,211 TOTAL CAPACITY 1 39,705 39,705 39,705 39,705 39,705 39,705 39,705 Total Enrollment/Projection 2 24,432 24,094 23,683 23,344 23,022 22,686 22,343 DISTRICT AVAILABLE CAPACITY 15,246 15,584 15,995 16,334 16,656 16,992 17,335 1 Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes. 2 Projection Source: School Facilities Organization, Information and Condition of Schools (Report 1049) P R O J E C T E D Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 May 2025 26 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY SCHOOL YEAR 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31 Actual Elementary Permanent Capacity 1 16,696 16,696 16,696 16,696 16,696 16,696 16,696 Additional Permanent Classrooms 2 0000000 Permanent Program Capacity Subtotal 16,696 16,696 16,696 16,696 16,696 16,696 16,696 Interim Portable Capacity 3,228 3,228 3,228 3,228 3,228 3,228 3,228 TOTAL CAPACITY 1 19,924 19,924 19,924 19,924 19,924 19,924 19,924 ENROLLMENT / PROJECTION 2 11,401 11,237 11,046 10,815 10,575 10,474 10,304 SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY 8,496 8,660 8,851 9,082 9,322 9,423 9,593 1 Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes. 2 Projection Source: School Facilities Organization, Information and Condition of Schools (Report 1049) ELEMENTARY: Grades K - 5 Elementary Grade K-5 P R O J E C T E D Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 A May 2025 27 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY SCHOOL YEAR 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31 Actual Middle School Permanent Capacity 1 7,216 7,216 7,216 7,216 7,216 7,216 7,216 Changes to Middle School Capacity 0000000 Permanent Program Capacity Subtotal 7,216 7,216 7,216 7,216 7,216 7,216 7,216 Portable Interim Capacity 1 375 375 375 375 375 375 375 TOTAL CAPACITY 1 7,591 7,591 7,591 7,591 7,591 7,591 7,591 ENROLLMENT / PROJECTION 2 5,815 5,717 5,632 5,633 5,640 5,484 5,361 SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY 1,776 1,874 1,959 1,958 1,951 2,107 2,230 1 Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes. MIDDLE SCHOOL: Grades 6 - 8 2 Projection Source: School Facilities Organization, Information and Condition of Schools (Report 1049) P R O J E C T E D Middle School Grade 6-8 Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 B May 2025 28 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY SCHOOL YEAR 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31 Actual Senior High Permanent Capacity 1 10,097 10,097 10,097 10,097 10,097 10,097 10,097 Changes to High School Capacity 0000000 Permanent Program Capacity Subtotal 10,097 10,097 10,097 10,097 10,097 10,097 10,097 Portables Interim Capacity 1 608 608 608 608 608 608 608 TOTAL CAPACITY 1 10,705 10,705 10,705 10,705 10,705 10,705 10,705 ENROLLMENT / PROJECTION 2 7,216 7,140 7,005 6,896 6,807 6,728 6,678 SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY 3,489 3,565 3,700 3,809 3,898 3,977 4,027 1 Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes. HIGH SCHOOL: Grades 9 - 12 P R O J E C T E D 2 Projection Source: School Facilities Organization, Information and Condition of Schools (Report 1049) Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 C May 2025 29 VIII - Finance Plan The finance plan shown on Table 6 demonstrates how the Kent School District plans to finance improvements for the years 2024-2025 through 2030-2031. The financing components include secured and unsecured funding and impact fees. The plan is based on future bond issues, state school construction assistance, collection of impact fees under the State Growth Management Act and voluntary mitigation fees paid pursuant to State Environmental Policy Act. In November 2016, the District held a special election to approve the authorization of $252,000,000 in bonding authority. The projects described below are part of this authorization. The first series of bonds ($80 million) were issued in February 2017, which funded the Covington Elementary Replacement School, as well as other infrastructure projects. Impact fees were used at both River Ridge Elementary School and Kent Laboratory Academy projects due to escalation in construction pricing across the Pacific Northwest. According to RCW 82.02.090, the definition of an impact fee is ". . . a payment of money imposed upon development as a condition of development approval to pay for public facilities needed to serve new growth and development, and that is reasonably related to the new development that creates additional demand and need for public facilities, that is a proportionate share of the cost of the public facilities, and that is used for facilities that reasonably benefit the new development. `Impact fee' does not include a reasonable permit or application fee." Mitigation or impact fees can be calculated on the basis of "unhoused student need" or "the maintenance of a district's level of service" as related to new residential development. A mitigation/impact fee may be imposed based upon a determination of insufficient existing permanent and/or interim portable school space or to pay for permanent and/or newly acquired interim portable school space previously constructed as a result of growth in the district. A district's School Board must first approve the application of the mitigation or impact fees and, in turn, approval must then be granted by the other general government jurisdictions having responsibility within the district, counties, cities and towns (Kent, Covington, Renton, Auburn, Black Diamond, Maple Valley, SeaTac, and Unincorporated King County). Though the current enrollment projections increase for both elementary and secondary schools are relatively flat, the ongoing need to provide permanent instructional facilities to house students is a driving need as the shifts in our family populations continue, due to ongoing development. Previously collected impact fees may be used to support and address the challenges related to the number of interim instructional facilities currently in use, the replacement of some of these aged facilities, the maintenance of the district's level of services, and the potential expansions to existing facilities in future years. The Kent School District 2024-2025 CFP update includes continued execution of the 2016 Capital Bond Projects, the 2018 Levy Projects, and the data collection and review of our Facility Assessment Reports. The District Facilities and Capital Planning Teams had come together and joined the Capital 30 Bond Planning Task Force (CBPTF) which included District personnel, design professionals, teaching staff, student voices, as well as community members who collaborated and discussed the District’s needs. The initial plan revealed priorities including school replacement due to age, and the need for added permanent facilities to (1) reduce and eliminate our need for portables and (2) accommodate future growth as housing in the Kent region continues to expand. We started with a list of 2 billion in needs and through itemizing and prioritizing, we brought the list of essential projects to 495 million. This list was brought before the District’s Board of Directors for comments, discussion, and approval. A Capital Bond Measure followed and went out to vote in April 2023 and did not pass with voter approval. After the failure to pass the 2023 Bond, we re-evaluated needs as well as next steps. Surveys went out to the community to see what people would like to prioritize from the list of needed projects. A new list of projects was presented through the 2023 Levy in November. This levy did not pass. This list was again taken and revised to prioritize projects that are critical to operations and life safety within our buildings. In April we set forth our 2024 Levy to a vote, which also did not receive the needed support to pass. We once again reduced the Levy list to include only emergent needs to critical building operations, and the measure was approved by voters in November of 2024. Future updates to this Capital Facilities Plan will include details of any adopted planning. With the opening of Canyon Ridge Middle School, our sixth grade moving from elementary to middle school, and our boundary change, we have advanced opportunities to even out capacity at each site to accommodate our programs, district-wide site capacity, and student-based needs. For the Six-Year Finance Plan, costs of future schools are based on estimates from Kent School District Capital Planning Team. Please see pages 13-14 for a summary of the cost basis. Cost Basis Summary For impact fee calculations, construction estimated costs are based on the last elementary school built in Kent, adjusted for inflation, and projected cost future elementary school, as well as average pricing of nearby school districts recently built new middle and new high school projects. Project Projected Cost New Elementary School $68,000,000 New Middle School $155,000,000 New High School $220,000,000 Site Acquisition Cost The site acquisition cost is based on an average cost of sites purchased or built on within the last ten years. Please see Table 7 for a list of site acquisition costs and averages. District Adjustment The impact fee calculations on Appendix B & C result in a zero-dollar impact fee total for this year but may be adjusted if needed per RCW 36.70A.130(2)(b) provision. 31 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 SIX-YEAR FINANCE PLAN Secured Unsecured Impact SCHOOL FACILITIES *2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 TOTAL Local & State State 2 or Local 3 Fees 5 Estimated Estimated PERMANENT FACILITIES No School Projects at this time.$0 TEMPORARY FACILITIES Additional portables 3 - 4 $0 OTHER N / A Totals $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 * F = Funded U = Unfunded NOTES: 2 The District anticipates receiving some State Funding Construction Assistance for some projects. 3 Facility needs are pending review. Some of these projects may be funded with impact fees. 4 Cost of portables based on current cost and adjusted for inflation for future years. 5 Fees in this column are based on amount of fees collected to date and estimated fees on future units. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 6 May 2024 32 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 Site Acquisitions & Costs Average of Sites Purchased, Sold or Built on within last 10 Years Type & # on Map School / Site Year Open / Purchased Sold Location Acreage Cost/Price Avg cost-price/acre Total Average Cost / Acre Elementary No Acquisitions for Elemenary Schools 0.00 $0 Elementary Site Subtotal 0.00 $0 $0 Elem site average Middle School No Acquisitions for Middle Schools 0.00 $0 Middle School Site Subtotal 0.00 $0 $0 Middle Schl Site Avg. Senior High No Acquisitions for High Schools 0.00 $0 $0 Senior High Site Subtotal 0.00 $0 $0 Sr Hi Site Average Note: All rural sites were purchased prior to adoption of Urban Growth Area. Numbers correspond to locations on Site Bank & Acquisitions Map on Page 17. 1 / Urban Site - Covington area North (So of Mattson MS)1984 2 / Rural Site - Ham Lake east (Pollard)1992 4 / Urban Site - Shady Lake (Sowers-Blaine-Drahota-Paroline)1995 0.00 $0 5 / Rural Site - SE of Lake Morton area (West property)1993 0 0 0 9 / Rural Site - McMillan Assemblage (South of MC)98 - 04 10 / Urban Site - Yeh-Williams (W of 132 Ave SE at SE 288)1999 12a / Urban Site - 156th Ave. SE Covington (Wikstrom)2004 12b / Urban Site - SE 256th St. Covington (West of CO)2004 16 Site - 11027 SE Kent-Kangley, WA 98030 2023 Site - 11027 SE Kent-Kangley, WA 98030 0.9 $1,382,696.90 Land included building 16a Site - 11109 SE Kent-Kangley, WA 98030 2023 Site - 11109 SE Kent-Kangley, WA 98030 0.84 $1,744,009.52 Land included building Total Acreage & Cost Total Average Cost / Acre #DIV/0! Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 7 May 202233 IX - Summary of Changes to June 2025 Capital Facilities Plan The Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") is updated annually based on previous Plans in effect since 1993. The primary changes from the June 2024 Plan are summarized here. Capacity changes continue to reflect fluctuations in class size ratio and program changes. Changes in portables or transitional capacity reflect use, lease or purchase, sale, surplus and/or movement between facilities. The District worked with Educational Data Solutions, LLC to update student generation factors. The updated rates are included in the body of the Plan. The District expects to receive some State Funding Assistance (formerly called “state matching funds”) for projects in this Plan and tax credit factors are updated annually. Unfunded site and facility need will be reviewed in the future. The impact fees for 2025 calendar year will result in no collection of impact fees for both Single-Family and Multi-Family due to the capacity study completed in spring 2025. 34 X - Appendices KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT FACTORS FOR ESTIMATED IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS Changes to Impact Fee Calculation Factors Include: ITEM Grade /Type FROM TO Increase/ Decrease Comments Student Generation Factor Elem 0.229 0.222 -0.007 Single Family (SF) MS 0.087 0.092 0.005 SH 0.113 0.116 0.003 Total 0.429 0.430 0.001 Student Generation Factor Elem 0.109 0.075 -0.034 Multi-Family (MF) MS 0.037 0.030 -0.007 SH 0.054 0.032 -0.022 Total 0.200 0.137 -0.063 State Funding Assistance Ratios (“State Match”) 52.88% 54.31% 1.43% Per OSPI Website Area Cost Allowance $375.00 $375.00 0.000 Per OSPI Website Link Average Assessed Valuation (AV) SF $594,679 $657,970 63,291 King County AV - Average of Condominiums & Apts. MF $310,811 $320,116 9,305 King County Debt Service Capital Levy Rate / $1000 $1.11 $0.46 ($0.65) Per King Co. Assessor Report General Obligation Bond Interest Rate 3.48% 4.37% 0.89% Bond Buyers 20 year GO Index Impact Fee - Single Family SF $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 No Change Impact Fee - Multi-Family MF $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 No Change 35 The Issaquah School District No. 411 hereby provides this Capital Facilities Plan documenting present and future school facility requirements of the District. The plan contains all elements required by the Growth Management Act and King County Council Ordinance 21-A. The Issaquah School District No. 411 hereby provides this Capital Facilities Plan documenting present and future school facility requirements of the District. The plan contains all elements required by the Growth Management Act and King County Council Ordinance 21-A. Exhibit C Page 2 of 30 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................... 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................. 3 STANDARD OF SERVICE ............................................................................................................... 4 WHEN TO CONSTRUCT A NEW BUILDING .................................................................................. 5 ENROLLMENT METHODOLOGY .............................................................................................. 6-7 TABLE 1: ACTUAL STUDENT COUNTS & ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS ................................. 8 TABLE 1A: 10-YEAR LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH ENROLLMENT FORECAST .................................... 9 TABLE 2: ENROLLMENT HISTORY .............................................................................................10 TABLE 3: STUDENT FACTORS – SINGLE FAMILY & MULTI-FAMILY .......................................11 INVENTORY AND EVALUATION OF CURRENT FACILITIES .....................................................12 SITE LOCATION MAP ...................................................................................................................13 URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY MAP ...........................................................................................14 SIX-YEAR CONSTRUCTION PLAN ..............................................................................................15 TABLE 4: PROJECTED CAPACITY TO HOUSE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL STUDENTS ............16 TABLE 5: PROJECTED CAPACITY TO HOUSE MIDDLE SCHOOL STUDENTS .......................17 TABLE 6: PROJECTED CAPACITY TO HOUSE HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS ...........................18 APPENDIX A: 6-YEAR FINANCE PLAN ........................................................................................19 APPENDIX B: 2024-25 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CAPACITIES ..................................................20 APPENDIX C: 2024-25 MIDDLE SCHOOL CAPACITIES .............................................................21 APPENDIX D: 2024-25 HIGH SCHOOL CAPACITIES ..................................................................22 APPENDIX E: 2024-25 TOTAL SCHOOL CAPACITIES ...............................................................23 NEED FOR IMPACT FEES AND GROWTH-RELATED CAPACITY NEEDS ........................ 24-25 BASIS FOR DATA USED IN SCHOOL IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS ......................................26 SCHOOL IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS .....................................................................................27 APPENDIX F: STUDENT GENERATION RATES MEMO ..................................................... 28-30 Page 3 of 30 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") has been prepared by the Issaquah School District (the “District”) as the District’s primary facility planning document for the period 2025–2031. The Plan is prepared in compliance with the Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA) and King County Council Code Title 21A. The GMA, enacted in 1990, requires fast-growing counties and cities to develop comprehensive plans to manage population growth, protect natural resources, and coordinate land use with public infrastructure—including schools. Under the GMA, school districts are required to plan for future facility needs and demonstrate that adequate capacity exists to support projected development. This Plan incorporates enrollment projections, facility capacities, and known development trends using the most current data available as of April 2025. This Plan represents an update to previously adopted long-term Capital Facilities Plans. While it serves as the District’s primary planning document for the six-year period, it is not intended to provide a static or exhaustive response to all facility needs. The District actively monitors enrollment trends, development activity, facility utilization, and educational program changes, and adjusts planning efforts to respond to evolving conditions. As necessary, the District may develop interim or supplemental long-range Capital Facilities Plans consistent with Board policy and informed by updated data and forecasts. All such plans will align with the overall direction and framework provided in this Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan. In June 1992, the District first requested that King County impose and collect school impact fees on new developments in unincorporated areas. The King County Council adopted the District’s initial plan and implementing ordinance on November 16, 1992. This Plan represents the District’s annual update to the Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan. King County and the cities of Issaquah, Renton, Bellevue, Newcastle, and Sammamish currently collect school impact fees on behalf of the District. Most jurisdictions provide exemptions for senior housing and certain types of low-income housing. In accordance with the requirements of the Growth Management Act, the District will continue to update this Plan on an annual basis, with adjustments to the fee schedule(s) as needed to reflect current data and conditions. Page 4 of 30 STANDARD OF SERVICE School facility and student capacity needs are dictated by the types and amounts of space required to accommodate the District’s adopted educational program. The educational program standards which typically drive facility space needs include State-mandated requirements and locally adopted programming decisions relevant to grade configuration, optimal facility size, class size, educational program offerings, as well as classroom utilization and scheduling requirements and use of re- locatable classroom facilities (portables). Class sizes vary by grade level and program to reflect the differing instructional needs of students, including those in special education and highly capable programs. The Issaquah School Board has established local class size standards, which are maintained through the use of local levy funds. The District uses an average class size of 20 students for grades K–5, 26 students for grades 6–8, and 28 students for grades 9–12 when calculating building capacities. Special education class sizes are based on an average of 12 students per classroom. The District has offered Full-Day Kindergarten since the 2016–2017 school year. For the purposes of capacity analysis, rooms designated for special use, consistent with King County Council Code Title 21A, are excluded from classroom counts. Invariably, some classrooms will have student loads greater in number than this average level of service and some will be smaller. Program demands, state and federal requirements, collective bargaining agreements, and available funding may also affect this level of service in the years to come. Due to these variables, a utilization factor of 95% is used to adjust design capacities to what a building may actually accommodate. Historically, in Capital Facilities Plans, the ISD has used a utilization rate of 95% which is very conservative. Other districts use utilization rates between 70% to 85%. Lower utilization rates have the effect of showing less capacity. Portables used as classrooms accommodate enrollment increases for interim purposes until permanent classrooms are available. In addition to serving temporary capacity needs, portables also provide flexible instructional space that can be adapted to changing programmatic or scheduling requirements. When permanent facilities become available, portables may be relocated to other school sites to address emerging needs or removed from service, depending on long-term facility planning. The District currently has one undeveloped site, planned for a new high school and future elementary school. The State does not provide funding for property purchases. The District’s voters approved the 2016 Bond to provide funding for a new high school, new middle school, two new elementary schools, a rebuild/expansion of an existing middle school and additions to six existing elementary schools. All of those projects are now complete with the exception of the new high school and one new elementary school. The new high school is discussed further in this Capital Facilities Plan and will require additional funding sources. The new elementary school is on indefinite hold until capacity at the elementary level is needed. In 2022 voters approved a capital levy in amount of $44,000,000 to help pay for the new comprehensive high school. Unfortunately, due to construction cost escalation from conditions surrounding the pandemic, this amount plus other capital funds the district already had, was still not sufficient to build the full comprehensive high school as planned and designed. The District is currently working through a plan to build a portion of the new high using the funds from the previously approved levy and other dedicated capital funds. This plan would help alleviate some of the overcrowding at the high school level but would not solve the issue entirely. Page 5 of 30 WHEN TO CONSTRUCT A NEW BUILDING The Issaquah School District Capital Facilities Plan proposes construction of a new high school to meet capacity needs at the high school level related to recent enrollment growth. The District in recent years, funded by the 2016 Bond, completed construction of a new elementary school, Cedar Trails Elementary School, a new middle school, Cougar Mountain Middle School, as well as additions at several elementary schools, all to help address recent growth needs. The need for new schools and school additions is triggered by comparing our enrollment forecasts with our permanent capacity figures. These forecasts are by grade level and, to the extent possible, by geography. The analysis provides a list of new construction needed by school year. The decision on when to construct a new facility involves factors other than verified need. Funding is the most serious consideration. Factors including the potential tax rate for our citizens, the availability of state funds and impact fees, the ability to acquire land, and the ability to pass bonds and capital levies determine when any new facility can be constructed. New school facilities are a response, in part, to new housing which the county or cities have approved for construction. The District's Six-Year Finance Plan is shown in Appendix A. Page 6 of 30 ENROLLMENT METHODOLOGY Development Tracking and Student Generation Rates In order to increase the accuracy and validity of enrollment projections, a major emphasis has been placed on the collection and tracking data of known new housing developments. This data provides two useful pieces of planning information. First, it is used to determine the actual number of students that are generated from a single family or multi-family residence. Secondly, it provides important information on the impact new housing developments will have on existing facilities and/or the need for additional facilities. Developments that have been completed or are still selling houses are used to forecast the number of students who will attend our schools from future developments. The District used a third-party consultant to review recent development data and provide updated student generation rates for elementary school, middle school and high school student per new single-family residence and new multi-family housing. Updated rates are shown in Table 3. Enrollment Methodology The District uses two primary methods to estimate future student enrollment. These projections are inherently variable and are influenced by local land use decisions, market conditions, economic factors, and regional infrastructure improvements, including major transit projects. As such, the District analyzes a range of scenarios and, for planning purposes, adopts the high-range projection to ensure adequate capacity is available to meet potential growth. 1. The student 3-2-1 cohort survival method. Examine Issaquah School District enrollments for the last 5 years and determine the average cohort survival for the consecutive five-year period. Because cohort survival does not consider students generated from new development it is a conservative projection of actual enrollment. For the same reason, these projections are also slow to react to actual growth. The cohort method is also hampered by the fact that it does not account for anomalies affecting enrollment (i.e., the Covid-19 pandemic, temporary remote learning and the variations in the transition back to in-person learning). 2. Based on information from King County, realtors, developers, etc., the District seeks to establish the number of new dwelling units that will be sold each year and converts those units to new students based on the following: a) The number of actual new students as a percentage of actual new dwellings for the past several years. (The student generation factors are shown in Table 3) b) Determine the actual distribution of new students by grade level for the past several years, i.e., 5% to kindergarten, 10% to first grade, 2% to 11th grade, etc. c) Based on an examination of the history shown by (a) and (b) above, establish the most likely factor to apply to the projected new dwellings. After applying these methods, current enrollment is moved forward year-by-year, with adjustments for anticipated new students. It is important to note that while new housing typically signals growth, enrollment may decline even as population increases. This occurs as communities mature, resulting in fewer young children per household. To address this, the District monitors the number of school-age children per dwelling and adjusts projections accordingly, particularly at the kindergarten level. However, no precise statistical formula currently exists to capture these shifts perfectly. Page 7 of 30 ENROLLMENT METHODOLOGY (cont.) Past experience has shown that cohort-based projections tend to be more accurate over longer periods (e.g., 10 years), while development-based projections are more reliable in the short term. Recognizing this, the District examines both methods and adopts a projection range. For planning purposes, the high projection is used to ensure the District is prepared to meet growth-related facility needs (Table 1A). Enrollment projections for the 2025–26 through 2030–31 school years are provided in Table 1. Although modest increases are anticipated during this period, the District does not expect to return to historical peak enrollment levels in the near term. Several factors are expected to influence future enrollment, including: • Market conditions, such as housing supply and affordability • Regional labor trends that affect family relocation and job accessibility • Residential development activity within the District’s boundaries • Major infrastructure projects, particularly the planned Sound Transit light rail extension to the City of Issaquah, which is likely to: o Increase residential density near transit stations o Attract new families due to enhanced commuter access o Contribute to long-term enrollment growth beyond the current six-year planning horizon The City of Issaquah’s 2044 Comprehensive Plan anticipates zoning and infrastructure to support more than 14,000 new housing units, with 3,500 targeted by 2044. These units, concentrated in areas such as Central Issaquah and the Issaquah Highlands, are expected to impact school enrollment over the next two decades. While substantial increases in student population are not expected within the current six-year planning horizon, significant growth is projected in the 15-to-20-year timeframe. The District will continue to monitor local development activity, housing trends, and transit infrastructure plans to refine its projections and update future Capital Facilities Plans accordingly. Ongoing coordination with the City of Issaquah will be essential in planning for future school capacity, especially in areas of anticipated high-density development and transit access. Page 8 of 30 TABLE 1: ACTUAL STUDENT COUNTS & ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS ACTUAL STUDENT COUNTS: 2024-25 ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS: 2025-26 THRU 2030-31 Page 9 of 30 TABLE 1A: 10-YEAR LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH ENROLLMENT FORECAST The District uses the high enrollment forecast shown in the chart above as the basis for long-range facilities planning. While actual enrollment may align more closely with medium or low projections over the short term, relying on the high projection allows the District to proactively address potential capacity needs and avoid underbuilding in the face of uncertain future growth. This approach ensures that school facilities can accommodate increases in student population that may result from market conditions, housing development, or regional infrastructure projects. Using the high forecast reflects a conservative and responsible planning strategy that prioritizes preparedness and long-term flexibility. Page 10 of 30 TABLE 2: ENROLLMENT HISTORY The 10-Year Enrollment History table provides critical context for interpreting the six-year enrollment projections presented in Table 1. These historical headcounts, based on October 1st data, illustrate key enrollment trends, including a peak in 2019–20, a decline during the COVID-19 pandemic, and modest stabilization in recent years. It is important to clarify that the high projection presented in Table 1 does not rely solely on a traditional cohort progression model, where student counts are advanced from grade to grade based strictly on historical trends. Instead, the high forecast incorporates additional factors such as projected housing development, updated student generation rates, and regional influences—including the planned Sound Transit light rail extension into Issaquah. This approach allows the District to plan proactively for potential enrollment increases that may arise from new residential growth and infrastructure investments, ensuring school facilities can accommodate a range of future scenarios. Page 11 of 30 TABLE 3: STUDENT FACTORS – SINGLE FAMILY & MULTI-FAMILY Table 1 provides student generation rates (SGRs) based on recent housing development within the District. These rates quantify the average number of students generated per new single-family and multi-family housing unit by grade level and are a critical input for projecting future enrollment and assessing the impact of residential growth on school facility needs. Page 12 of 30 INVENTORY AND EVALUATION OF CURRENT FACILITIES Currently, using the 95% utilization factor, the District has the capacity to house 18,630 students in permanent facilities and an additional 4,688 students in portables. While portables are critical for meeting short-term enrollment fluctuations, they are not considered a viable long-term solution for capacity planning. For that reason, the District relies on its adjusted permanent capacity when determining growth-related needs. The projected student enrollment for the 2025–26 school year is 18,355, leaving a modest districtwide surplus of 275 permanent seats. However, this overall surplus does not reflect the ongoing imbalance across grade levels. High school enrollment continues to exceed permanent capacity, and projections show that this pressure will persist throughout the six-year planning period. As a result, the District remains focused on identifying long-term solutions to address high school overcrowding, even as elementary and middle school capacity remains sufficient. Calculations of elementary, middle school, and high school capacities are provided in Appendices B, C, and D, respectively. These facility locations and sites are shown on the District Site Location Map. EXISTING FACILITIES LOCATION GRADE SPAN K-5: Apollo Elementary 15025 S.E. 117th Street, Renton Briarwood Elementary 17020 S.E. 134th Street, Renton Cascade Ridge Elementary 2020 Trossachs Blvd. S.E., Sammamish Cedar Trails Elementary 4399 Issaquah-Pine Lake Rd S.E. , Sammamish Challenger Elementary 25200 S.E. Klahanie Blvd., Issaquah Clark Elementary 335 First Ave. S.E., Issaquah Cougar Ridge Elementary 4630 167th Ave. S.E., Bellevue Creekside Elementary 20777 SE 16th Street, Sammamish Discovery Elementary 2300 228th Ave. S.E., Sammamish Endeavour Elementary 26205 S.E. Issaquah-Fall City Rd., Issaquah Grand Ridge Elementary 1739 NE Park Drive, Issaquah Issaquah Valley Elementary 555 N.W. Holly Street, Issaquah Maple Hills Elementary 15644 204th Ave. S.E., Issaquah Newcastle Elementary 8440 136th Ave S.E., Newcastle Sunny Hills Elementary 3200 Issaquah-Pine Lake Rd. S.E., Sammamish Sunset Elementary 4229 W. Lk. Sammamish Pkwy. S.E., Issaquah GRADE SPAN 6-8: Beaver Lake Middle School 25025 S.E. 32nd Street, Issaquah Cougar Mountain Middle School 1929 NW Talus Dr, Issaquah Issaquah Middle School 600 2nd Ave. Ave. S.E., Issaquah Maywood Middle School 14490 168th Ave. S.E., Renton Pacific Cascade Middle School 24635 SE Issaquah-Fall City Rd, Issaquah Pine Lake Middle School 3095 Issaquah-Pine Lake Rd., Sammamish GRADE SPAN 9-12: Issaquah High School 700 Second Ave. S.E., Issaquah Liberty High School 16655 S.E. 136th Street, Renton Skyline High School 1122 228th Ave. S.E., Sammamish Gibson Ek High School 379 First Ave. S.E., Issaquah SUPPORT SERVICES: Administration Building 5150 220th Ave S.E., Issaquah Holly Street Early Learning Center 565 N.W. Holly Street, Issaquah May Valley Service Center 16404 S.E. May Valley Road, Renton Transportation Center - Main 805 Second Avenue S.E., Issaquah Transportation Center - Satellite 3402 228th Ave. S.E., Sammamish Page 13 of 30 SITE LOCATION MAP Page 14 of 30 URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY MAP Page 15 of 30 SIX-YEAR CONSTRUCTION PLAN The District's Six-Year Finance Plan is shown in Appendix A. State funding and impact fees are also not reliable sources of revenue for construction related projects. State funding is available only for certain qualifying school construction projects, with funds received only after the matched project is complete. Site acquisition and site improvements are not eligible to receive state matching funds. Impact fee revenue is dependent on growth activity and not always easy to predict. As a result, the District must also rely on voter-approved ballot measures to fund school construction. Table 6 presents the District’s projected capacity to accommodate high school students, including the addition of a new high school facility. In April 2016, voters approved a $533 million bond to fund a range of capital projects, including land acquisition and construction of a new high school, a new middle school, two new elementary schools, the rebuild and expansion of an existing middle school, and additions to six existing elementary schools. To support the high school project further, voters passed a $44 million capital levy in April 2022. These funds will be used to construct a new high school to alleviate overcrowding at existing campuses. The District also anticipates receiving State matching funds for the high school project, which will be applied back to the project. Page 16 of 30 TABLE 4: PROJECTED CAPACITY TO HOUSE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL STUDENTS Page 17 of 30 TABLE 5: PROJECTED CAPACITY TO HOUSE MIDDLE SCHOOL STUDENTS Page 18 of 30 TABLE 6: PROJECTED CAPACITY TO HOUSE HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS As shown in Table 6, the District’s high school enrollment is projected to exceed existing permanent capacity beginning in 2025 and continuing through the 6-year planning period. In 2025 and 2026, the District is expected to operate with a permanent capacity deficit of over 1,000 students after accounting for a 95% utilization rate. To address this growing enrollment pressure, the District will add permanent capacity for 656 high school students in 2027 through the construction of a new high school facility. This added capacity significantly reduces the shortfall, bringing the permanent capacity deficit down to fewer than 400 students and continuing to narrow the gap through 2030. As needed to address capacity needs, before the high school addition is complete, the District may consider adjusting the building utilization factor to create additional interim capacity. With this new capacity in place, the District will be positioned to phase out its reliance on portable classrooms. While portables will still be required in the short term, the addition of permanent space sets the stage for a gradual reduction in their use. This transition will enhance the learning environment and promote more equitable access to core instructional spaces and amenities. The strategy aligns with the District’s long-term capital planning goals and its commitment to providing equitable, high-quality educational facilities across all attendance areas. Page 19 of 30 APPENDIX A: 6-YEAR FINANCE PLAN Page 20 of 30 APPENDIX B: 2024-25 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CAPACITIES Page 21 of 30 APPENDIX C: 2024-25 MIDDLE SCHOOL CAPACITIES Page 22 of 30 APPENDIX D: 2024-25 HIGH SCHOOL CAPACITIES Page 23 of 30 APPENDIX E: 2024-25 TOTAL SCHOOL CAPACITIES Page 24 of 30 NEED FOR IMPACT FEES AND GROWTH-RELATED CAPACITY NEEDS The District historically relied on school impact fee revenue to help fund growth-related capacity needs. However, by law, impact fees can only be used to fund a portion of a growth-related capacity project. As demonstrated in Appendix B the District currently has a permanent capacity (at 95%) to serve 8,763 students at the elementary level. This leaves the District’s elementary enrollment under permanent capacity by 901 students (current enrollment is identified in Table 1). As demonstrated in Appendix C the District currently has a permanent capacity (at 95%) to serve 4,946 students at the middle school level. This leaves the District’s middle school enrollment under permanent capacity by 469 students (current enrollment is identified in Table 1). As demonstrated in Appendix D the District currently has a permanent capacity (at 95%) to serve 4,921 students at the high school level. This leaves the District’s high school enrollment over permanent capacity by 1,095 students (current enrollment is identified in Table 1). The capacity need is driven by historic and recent growth. However, the District’s six-year enrollment projections in Table 1 demonstrate that the District does not anticipate growth to occur over the six-year planning period. Thus, while the high school capacity need remains significant, it is not related to anticipated growth in the six-year period and, therefore, the project is no longer eligible as a basis for impact fees. Future updates to this CFP will consider growth-related eligibility for inclusion in the impact fee formula. Based on the District’s student generation rates (Table 3), the District expects that 0.615 students will be generated from each new single family home and 0.189 students will be generated from each new multi-family dwelling unit. Comparatively, the previous year SGR’s were 0.641 for single family home and 0.159 for a multi-family unit. Applying the enrollment projections contained in Table 1 to the District’s existing permanent capacity (Appendices A, B, and C) and if no capacity improvements are made by the year 2029-30, and permanent capacity is adjusted to 95%, the District elementary population will be under its permanent capacity by 659 students, under permanent capacity at the middle school level by 838 students, and over permanent capacity by 778 students at the high school level. Importantly, the above figures incorporate recently completed growth-projects at the elementary and middle school levels. The District recently opened the new Cougar Mountain Middle School, with permanent capacity of 828, and the new Cedar Trails Elementary School, with permanent capacity of 496 students. Both schools were funded by the April 2016 bond and provide capacity to serve new growth. Page 25 of 30 NEED FOR IMPACT FEES AND GROWTH-RELATED CAPACITY NEEDS (cont) In those years when the District requests school impact fees for growth-related projects, the school impact fee formula ensures that new development only pays for the cost of the facilities nec essitated by new development. The fee calculations examine the costs of housing the students generated by each new single family dwelling unit or each new multi-family dwelling unit and then reduces that amount by credits for the anticipated state match and future tax payments. The resulting impact fee is then discounted as required by local ordinances. Thus, by applying the student generation factor to the school project costs, the fee formula only calculates the costs of providing capacity to serve eac h new dwelling unit. The formula does not require new development to contribute the costs of providing capacity to address existing needs. The King County Council and the City Councils of the cities of Bellevue, Issaquah, Newcastle, Renton and Sammamish have created a framework for collecting school impact fees and the District can demonstrate that new developments will have an impact on the District. Impact fees must be used in a manner consistent with RCW 82.02.050-110 and the adopted local ordinances. Engrossed Senate Bill 5923, enacted in the 2015 Legislative Session, requires that developers be provided an option to defer payment of impact fees to final inspection, certificate of occupancy, or closing, with no fees deferred longer than 18 months from building permit issuance. The District adopts the positions that: (1) no school impact fee should be collected later than the earlier of final inspection or 18 months from the time of building permit issuance; and (2) no developer applicant should be permitted to defer payment of school impact fees for more than 20 dwelling units in a single year. The District is not requesting school impact fees as a part of this 2025 Capital Facilities Plan update. Page 26 of 30 BASIS FOR DATA USED IN SCHOOL IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS This section is not updated for the 2025 Capital Facilities Plan since the District is not requesting a school impact fee. Future updates to this CFP may include an impact fee. Page 27 of 30 SCHOOL IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS This section is not updated for the 2025 Capital Facilities Plan since the District is not requesting a school impact fee. Future updates to this CFP may include an impact fee. Page 28 of 30 APPENDIX F: STUDENT GENERATION RATES MEMO Page 29 of 30 APPENDIX F: STUDENT GENERATION RATES MEMO (cont) Page 30 of 30 APPENDIX F: STUDENT GENERATION RATES MEMO (cont) D>‘énton CAPITAL PLANNING SCHOOL DISTRICT AND CONSTRUCTION SERVICE |EXCELLENCE |EQUITY DATE:June 16,2025 TO:Dr.Damien Pattenaude,Superintendent FROM:Matt Feldmeyer,Executive Director,Capital Planning and Construction Mee Ss FOR BOARD MEETING:June 25,2025 G/\e/2 CONSENT AGENDAITEM:2025-2031 Capital Facilities Plan A Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan,to be updated annually,is required by the Washington State Growth Management Act and the School Impact Fee Ordinance Act,of King County,Code Title 21A.If serves as a guide to the development of school facilities and forms the basis for the calculation of school impact fees that are imposed on new development by King County and the cities whose service areas overlap the Renton School District. The Plan is intended to evaluate the need for future facilities based on forecast enrollment growth and student capacity of existing facilities.The Plan also identifies potential sources of funding for additional construction or acquisition. DISTRICT GOALS: Removing Barriers &Supporting Students BUDGET IMPLICATION: This item has no budget implication. RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the District's 2025 Capital Facilities Plan. Attachment:2025 Capital Facilities Plan Recommendations: |haye reviewed ang |a i.i _ jennifer A.(Fprmer /pe ‘Agsistant Stperintendent of Finance and Operations/CFO SERVICE |EXCELLENCE |EQUITY 7812 S 124 St,Seattle,Washington 98178-4830 |p.425.204.4403 |£.425.204.4476 Exhibit D 1 2025 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Renton School District No. 403 Board of Directors Stefanie McIrvin, Ed. D, President Justin Booker, Vice President Avanti Bergquist, MD Susan Talley Pam Teal Damien Pattenaude, Ed. D, Superintendent Adopted: _June 25, 2025_ 2025 SIX YEAR CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Renton School District No. 403 TABLE OF CONTENTS II. II. IV. VI. VIL. VII. INTRODUCTION ENROLLMENT TRENDS STANDARD OF SERVICE & CAPACITY ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS GROWTH RELATED PROJECTS SIX-YEAR FINANCE PLAN IMPACT FEES APPENDICES I. INTRODUCTION Purpose of the Capital Facilities Plan: This Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan (the “Plan”)is prepared by the Renton School District (the “District”) in compliance with the requirements of the Washington State Growth Management Act (the “GMA”), King County Code, and applicable ordinances of the cities of Bellevue, Newcastle, and Renton. The Plan was prepared using data available in the spring of 2025. The GMA outlines 14 broad goals including adequate provision of necessary public facilities and services. Schools are among these necessary facilities and services. School districts adopt capital facilities plans to satisfy the requirements of RCW 36.70A.070 and to identify additional school facilities necessary to meet the educational needs of the growing student populations anticipated in their districts. It is the District’s intent that the Plan be adopted by King County and the cities of Bellevue, Newcastle, Renton, SeaTac, and Tukwila as a sub-element of their respective Capital Facilities Plans. Currently, King County and the cities of Bellevue, Newcastle, and Renton collect school impact fees on behalf of the District when requested. The Capital Facilities Plan contains the following required elements: 1. Enrollment forecasts for each grade span over the next six years. 2. Aninventory of the existing capital facilities owned by the District and capacity of those facilities based on the District’s current Standard of Service. 3. A forecast of future needs for capital facilities and the proposed capacities of expanded or new facilities. 4. A six-year plan for financing those capital improvements. As relevant, a calculation of school impact fees and data substantiating such fees.5. Overview of the Renton School District: The District is located on the south end of Lake Washington,eleven miles southeast of Seattle and eleven miles south of Bellevue. Home to more than 100,000 people who value working, living, and playing in the Pacific Northwest, Renton has a strong economic base and a favorable business climate. The District spans approximately thirty-two square miles and serves a diverse population of approximately 14,000 students in pre-K through 12th grade at four high schools, four middle schools, sixteen elementary schools, and an early childhood learning center. District programs also address the special needs of disabled, academically gifted, and artistically talented students. Three schools (Renton Park Elementary, McKnight Middle, and Lindbergh High) are U.S. Department of Education-recognized Blue-Ribbon Schools of Excellence. Community support for Renton schools is strong. School levies, which make up 25% of the district's budget, have been consistently approved by the community for more than 20 years. Voter-approved bond measures or capital facilities levies from 1992 through 2022 have brought exciting improvements in school buildings and support facilities, including the rebuilding of all elementary schools, the remodeling of most middle and high schools, and the recent additional construction of two new elementary schools (Sartori and Hilltop Heritage) and a middle school (Risdon). Voter support has also provided state-of-the-art technology -a must to prepare students for living and working in this leading high-tech region. Every classroom has high-speed Internet connections and ample computer devices for all students. Ensuring each student graduates with options and is prepared to participate fully in our democracy is at the heart of Renton School District's mission. Three core values of Service, Excellence, and Equity guide the district’s strategic framework in family and community engagement, excellence in learning and teaching, and removing barriers and supporting students. Students are encouraged to reach for excellence through a variety of programs that focus on rigorous academic skills, problem solving, creative and critical thinking, and social and emotional growth. Renton School District staff are committed to preparing all students for success in their post-secondary journey. Teachers are encouraged to take an active role in promoting their own professional growth through collaborating on the use and development of high-quality instructional materials, sharing successful strategies, and looking for new ways to assess student progress. This focus on continuous staff development enables teachers to consistently improve the quality of instruction and prepares them to help students meet rigorous state academic standards. The District’s voters in 2019 approved a $249.6 M bond measure to fund a new elementary school (Hilltop Heritage Elementary School) to accommodate enrollment needs. Sartori Elementary School opened in 2018 as a choice school, providing additional capacity relief. The voters in November 2022 approved a $676 M bond to fund property acquisition and construction of a new Renton High School and security, seismic, and building systems updates at various schools throughout the District. Property acquisition is currently in process and the high school project is in the design phase currently. In recent years the District’s K-12 enrollment has seen an overall decline. Consistent with much of the region, the District’s enrollment was affected by the global pandemic, lower birth rates, and increases in home based school instruction. The number of new homes planned for future construction in the District continues to be higher than the number of permitted units that were built between 2019 and 2023. The District anticipates, based on recent enrollment projections, that enrollment at all grade levels is likely to see a small decrease over the six year planning period. The District plans to monitor actual enrollment patterns closely and will incorporate new information as a part of future updates to this Plan. Il. STANDARD OF SERVICE & CAPACITY The District’s Standard of Service is the standard adopted by the District that identifies the program year, school organizational structure, student/teacher ratios by grade level (considering the requirements of students with special needs), daily class schedule, types of facilities and other factors identified by the District as necessary to support its educational programs and objectives. The Standardof Service is used to ascertain current and future capacity. It should also be noted that although the State Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square foot guidelines for capacity funding criteria, those guidelines do not account for the actual program needs in the District. The Growth Management Act and King County Code 21A.43 authorize the District to adjust the standard of service based on the District's specific needs. The District uses a traditional elementary (K-5)/middle (6-8)/high school (9-12) organizational structure. The District, and the Renton Education Association, recognize that reasonable class size is necessary for optimum learning, and have established the following targets in student/teacher ratios for most regular classroom purposes: Students receive instruction in classes such as band/orchestra, choir, physical education at a larger ratio based on program and space. Student /teacher ratio for special education classes held in self-contained classrooms within comprehensive elementary and secondary facilities is assumed to be 12:1. Educational facilities dedicated solely to special education or other specialized programs are excluded from capacity calculations, as are associated student headcounts. At the high school level, due to adopted State and local graduation requirements,it is not possible to achieve 100% utilization of regular teaching stations. Based on actual utilization due to these considerations, the District uses a standard utilization rate of 80% at the high school level (4 out of 5 periods) for determining high school capacity. Beginning with the graduating class of 2020-2021, high school graduation requirements require one additional credit of science (three instead of two), and a total of twenty-four credits; three more than the previously required 21. This requirement impacts high school capacity as well. Additionally, similar to the high school utilization rate, a typical middle school utilizes a six period day and requires that one period be designated for teacher planning. This requirement reduces middle school capacity by one-sixth, or 17 percent. Student/teacher ratios are applicable to both permanent and relocatable classrooms. However, since relocatable facilities do not allow for the full range of educational activities promoted by the District, they are generally viewed as temporary or interim housing, necessary to Grade Levels K-1 21% Grade Level 2 22:1 Grade Level 3 24:1 Grade Levels 4-12 29:1 accommodate enrollment fluctuations and interim development driven enrollment increases until such time as permanentfacilities can be financed and constructed. For those reasons,relocatable classrooms capacities are calculated, but not used in the analysis of future facility needs. Using the Standard of Service, the District calculates building capacity for each of its facilities. The calculation is made by reviewing the use of each classroom/teaching station in each facility in collaboration with individual school leadership. Spaces in buildings used for special program purposes such as special education and alternative learning environments are not included in the District’s regular classroom capacity. Core facilities, such as the cafeteria or gymnasium,are not considered regular classrooms. A building’s regular classroom capacity may change from year to year. For example,if the school enrollment has a higher number of special education students in a given year, there is potential that a teaching station is removed from the capacity inventory, thereby reducing the overall school capacity for that given year. Capacity at the secondary school level is further limited by the previously identified class scheduling restrictions and student distribution among elective classes. Based on a typical middle school six-period day, where one period is designated for teacher planning, capacity is reduced by one-sixth, or 17 percent of theoretical capacity. Similarly, at high schools with a five-period day, capacity is reduced for a teacher planning period by one-fifth, or 20 percent. Elective classes, many of which require specialized classrooms, also figure into the equation for determining a school’s capacity, which together with required classes, require a well thought out master schedule if the facility’s capacity is to be maximized. The District’s capital facilities include both permanent structures and relocatable (interim or portable) classrooms. The District’s permanent K-12 facilities include 16 elementary schools, four middle schools, and four high schools. Two Special Instructional Use facilities house the District’s early childhood, special education, and alternative learning programs. Support facilities include the Kohlwes Education Center (District administration), Transportation Center, Facilities Operations and Maintenance Center, Nutrition Services/Warehouse, Renton Memorial Stadium, and the Lindbergh Swimming Pool. Total permanent facilities encompass 2,670,757 square feet, with 2,495,051 square feet (93%) devoted to K-12 and instructional special use. See Appendix A for District Maps. The District currently has a permanent K-12 facilities capacity of 15,342 (including the opening of Hilltop Heritage Elementary School fall of 2023). See Tables 1 & 2 below and Appendix B. Importantly, current and future capacity at the elementary level, as documented in this report, is based on the District’s current Standard of Service, and does not necessarily reflect aspirational K-3 student/teacher ratios of seventeen students to one teacher. The District continues to make progress towards these requirements, by utilizing available classroom space, added staffing and plans to utilize the new elementary school classrooms to work towards this ratio. Most recent ratios have been anywhere from 17.3 to 19:1 but staffing recent enrollment changes and budget impacts have slowed the district’s progress. The District relocatable or portable facilities are used primarily to address enrollment fluctuations and to house students on an interim or temporary basis until permanent facilities can Current Capacity: || be constructed. For those reasons they are not considered a long-term solution for housing students and are not considered “permanent” capacity. Of the 55 relocatable facilities in the ” containing two classrooms (approximately 1,792District’s inventory, 46 are “double portables square feet together), and nine are singles (each approximately 896 square feet). See Appendix B. Combined, they provide the District with a total of 101 relocatable classrooms, encompassing 90,496 square feet of additional space available for instruction. The tables below summarize existing K-12 permanent and portable classroom capacity. See also Appendix B for detail by school building. Table 1 -Existing Permanent and Portable Capacity by Grade Level FACILITY ELEMENTARY HIGH SCHOOLS TOTAL (K-12)TYPE SCHOOLS MIDDLE SCHOOLS Total TotalTotal Total Capacity/Permanent to Capacity/Permanent to Capacity/Permanent to Capacity/Permanent to Portable PortablePortable Portable 4,458 97.97% 15,342 89.02%PERMANENT 7,449 85.61% 3,435 86.22% 92 2.03% 1,892 10.98%RELOCATABLE 1,252 14.39% 548 13.76% TOTAL 8,701 100.00% 3,984 100.00% 4,550 100.00% 17,235 100.00% Table 2 -Inventory and Capacity of Permanent Facilities PROGRAM NAME LOCATION AREA (ft?) CAPACITY Benson Hill 18665 116th Ave. SE, Renton, 98058 67,533 520 Bryn Mawr 8212 S 118th St., Seattle, 98178 49,157 338 Campbell Hill 6418 S 124th St., Seattle, 98178 57,072 332 Cascade 16022 116th Ave. SE, Renton, 98058 59,164 467 a Hazelwood 7100 116th Ave. SE, Newcastle, 98056 66,161 591 5 Highlands 2727 NE 7th St., Renton, 98056 60,000 547 9 Hilltop Heritage 1075 Duvall Ave NE 98059 79,881 554 a Honey Dew 800 Union Ave. NE, Renton, 98059 54,620 336 z Kennydale 1700 NE 28th St., Renton, 98056 65,169 622 i Lakeridge 7400 S 115th St. Seattle, 98178 52,958 398 S Maplewood Hgts. 130 Jericho Ave., Renton, 98059 56,220 402 a Renton Park 16828 128th Ave. SE, Renton, 98058 65,955 476 m Sartori 332 Park Ave. N, Renton, 98057 76,797 554 Sierra Heights 2501 Union Ave. NE, Renton, 98058 53,992 472 Talbot Hill 2300 Talbot Rd., Renton, 98055 57,844 460 Tiffany Park 1601 Lake Youngs Way, Renton, 98058 58,758 380 Total Grades K-5 Capacity 981,281 7,449 Dimmitt 12320 -80th Ave. S, Seattle, 98178 109,070 794 WY McKnight 2600 NE 12th St., Renton, 98056 126,706 847 —! a SB Nelsen 2304 Jones Ave. S, Renton, 98055 124,234 896 = o Risdon 6928 -116th Ave. SE, Newcastle 98056 133,934 898 Total Grades 6-8 Capacity 493,944 3,435 a Hazen 1101 Hoquiam Ave. NE, Renton, 98059 327,395 1,462 3 Lindbergh 16426 -128th Ave. SE, Renton, 98058 242,662 1,211 © Renton 400 S 2nd St., Renton, 98057 278,373 1,389 2 Talley 7800 S 132nd St., Renton, 98178 70,831 397 oO = Total Grades 9-11 Capacity 919,261 4,458 TOTAL GRADE LEVELS K-12 2,394,486 15,342| 6 Meadow Crest ELC 1800 Index Ave. NE, Renton, 98056 68,752 464 2 = HOME Program -Spring Glen 2607 Jones Ave. S, Renton, 98055 7,008 84 < WW Renton Academy 2607 Jones Ave. S, Renton, 98055 24,805 48 Z Total Instructional Special Use 100,565 596 Total Instructional Facilities 2,495,051 15,938 | Facilities Operations Center 7812 S 124th St., Seattle, 98178 21,894 57,200Kohlwes Educational Center 300 SW 7th St., Renton, 98057 16740 -128th Ave. SE, Renton,ia 13,7102 Lindbergh Pool 98058 a Nutrition Services / iB Warehouse 409 S Tobin St., Renton 98057 27,466 & Renton Memorial Stadium 405 Logan Ave. N, Renton, 98057 35,193 20,243a Transportation Center 420 Park Ave. N, Renton, 98057 175,706Total Support Services 2,670,757|Total All Permanent Facilities Undeveloped Property The District currently has the following undeveloped real property in its inventory: Skyway Site S Langston Rd. & 76th Ave. S, Seattle 4.18 Acres D IV. ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS The District saw consistent year over year growth between 2011 and 2018. In 2019, enrollment started to decline slightly and, like most school districts, the District’s enrollment was impacted by the global pandemic and temporary closure of in-person learning. The District’s enrollment has continued to decline between 2021 and 2025. Using medium growth projections, the District expects that its enrollmentwill continue to decline approximately | percent each year for the next six-year planning period. Numerous methodologies are available for projecting long-term enrollments. The most common method is known as cohort survival which tracks groups of students through the system and adjusts the populations to accountfor the average year-to-year growth. For example, fourth grade enrollment is adjusted based on the average enrollment trend of the past in order to estimate next year’s fifth grade enrollment. This calculation method considers the past five years’ trends to determine the average adjustmentfactor for each grade, or cohort. The method works well for all grades except kindergarten, where there is no previous year data. For kindergarten, two methodologies are generally used: A linear extrapolation from the previous five years of kindergarten enrollment, assuming thatthere is a trend; or, alternatively, a comparison of the kindergarten enrollmentto births from five years prior can be used to calculate a “birth-to-k” ratio. For example, kindergarten enrollmentin 2025 is divided by the total births in King County in 2020 to produce a birth-to-k ratio. The average ratio for the last five years can then be applied to births in subsequentyears to estimate kindergarten enrollment. The Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction (OSPI) uses the cohort survival method to project enrollments for purposes of the School Construction Assistance Program. The cohort survival method generally works well for Districts that have a consistent trend of gradual increases or declines in enrollment.It is less reliable in Districts where spikes in demographic trends (especially a marked increase or decrease in new housing or other enrollment factors) can lead to dramatic swings in enrollment from one yearto the next. In addition, the use of the linear extrapolation method at the kindergarten level can result in a distorted trend since it does not consider changes in birth rate trends. Combining cohort survival with other information about births, housing, regional population trends, and even trends in service area and private school enrollment can often provide for a more accurate forecast. The District contracts with FLO Analytics to prepare a modified cohort survival projection. The modified cohort survival projection combines the average rollup at existing grades with estimates of growth expected from new housing, as well as assumptions about market share gains or losses that the District is likely to see at certain grade levels. Estimates of housing growth for this model were obtained from building permit information provided by the respective jurisdictions. However, there are many unknowns due to current market concerns in real estate, inflation, and recent changes in government funding and job markets. As a result, and to be prepared for the different scenarios, the District reviews three projections: a low, medium, and high. See Appendix for recent enrollment history and projected enrollment. Projection Methodology: 10 || The District reviewed FLO Analytics’ low, medium, and high modified cohort survival projections to determine our enrollment forecast for 2024-2030, and chose the medium scenario as the likely enrollment forecast for this time period. All of these scenarios included a continued decline in enrollment for the District. However, the medium scenario projected an enrollment decline similar to the last five years of enrollment, with slightly less of a decline per year to accommodate the current residential developments in the pipeline for our area. The District will continue to monitor development, move-in/move-outs, and trends within the four-county area to better predict enrollment more than two years out. Table 3 below identifies projected enrollment CHANGE ACTUALOCT.| Soso HEADCOUNT CHANGE 2024 -2030 2024 -2030 (medium) -6.30% (405) 6,027 6,432 ELEMENTARY -4.80% (148) 2,938 3,086 MIDDLE -6.29% (263) 3,917 4,180 HIGH -6.06% (10) 155 165 other/alt -5.96% (826.00) 13,037 13,863 TOTAL Projections through 2030-2031: using the medium growth scenario. Table 3 — Projected Enrollment — 2024 to 2030 11 || |||||| ||||| |||||| |||||| ||||| ||||| V. CAPITAL FACILITIES NEEDS AND PLANNING Capacity Needs: When considering the District’s existing permanent capacity as compared to projected enrollment through the 2030-2031 school year, the District shows sufficient capacity in the near term at the elementary, middle school, and high school level. Importantly, the opening of the new Sartori Elementary School in August 2018 and Hilltop Heritage Elementary School in 2023 addressed capacity-specific needs and provides an overall increase in capacity for the elementary grade span, which were identified during 2015 & 2018 long-range planning and Citizens’ Facilities Advisory Committee sessions in preparation for our voter-approved 2016 capital levy (which provided funding to construct Sartori Elementary School) and 2019 capital bond (which provided funding to construct Hilltop Heritage Elementary School). Table 4 compares the District’s permanent capacity (from Table 2) with the six year enrollment projections by grade level (Appendix D). Anticipated capacity additions over the planning period are included in the analysis but are subject to funding and completion. Table 4 -Capacity Analysis: Surplus/Deficit Projections* (2024/25 -2030/31) [ SURPLUS / DEFICIT CAPACITY PROJECTIONS’2024/25 -2030/31 | 24/25* 25/26 | 26/27 | 27/28 28/29 | 29/30 | 30/31 | BLEW K-5 "| PROGRAM CAPACITY STUDENT ENROLLMENT SURPLUS / (DEFICIT CAPACITY) 7,449 6 940 7,449 6,352 1,097 7,449 6,273 1,176 7,449 6,210 1,239 7,449 6,076 1,373 7,449 6,044 1,405 7,449 6,027 1,422 MIDDLE 6-8 PROGRAM CAPACITY STUDENT ENROLLMENT SURPLUS / (DEFICIT CAPACITY) 3,435 3, 3,435 3,194 241 3,435 3,162 273 3,435 3,129 306 3,435 3,057 378 3,435 3,008 427 3,435 2,938 497 HIGH 9-12 PROGRAM CAPACITY? STUDENT ENROLLMENT SURPLUS / (DEFICIT CAPACITY) | 4,458 \ 4,458 4,156 302 4,458 4,012 446 4,458 3,960 498 4,669 3,989 680 4,669 3,939 730 4,669 3,917 752 medium range projection -24/25 and beyond 1. Doesnot include relocatable facilities (portables) High School capacity increases by 211 students in 2028 with Renton HS replacement2. The 2022 voter-approved capital bond provided funding for property acquisition, planning, and construction of a replacement of Renton High School. This project is expected to include added program capacity to address potential enrollment growth beyond the six-year planning period. The project is also intended to replace an aging school building and work towards program equity across the high school grade space atall District high schools. 12 Additionally, the 2022 capital bond included a building modernization of Hazen High School, including seismic structural updates, safety/security updates, HVAC system updates,finish updates in classrooms, corridors, and the library. This project is eligible for approximately $28.6 million from OSPI — School Construction Assistance Program (SCAP) funding for a building modernization at the secondary school grade level. We are currently pursuing the SCAP funding for this project and it is the only OSPI — SCAP funding that the District is currently eligible to receive. Table 4 does not include planned capacity additions at the middle school level but there is discussion for future bond planning that includes the need to replace both Nelson Middle School and Dimmitt Middle School, based on the age and condition of the school buildings. The District will continue to monitor middle school enrollment growth to determine if additional capacity as a part of these potential projects is needed for growth. It should be noted that the District is also reaching its maximum limit in providing portable classrooms at many of its existing sites due to current land use and building code requirements. For the last six-year period, the District’s highest priorities have been to address existing and projected facility capacity deficits, aging infrastructure at secondary schools, and responding to/planning for both growth and program related added capacity. These projects funded by the 2019 bond, 2022 bond, and impact fees, are projects responding to growth. This has included: Completion of Hilltop Heritage Elementary School, helping to relieve capacity needs in e the Hazen High School service area. With the opening of Hilltop Heritage Elementary School in 2023, the District continues to have available capacity at the elementary level to serve potential enrollment growth. High school additions and/or renovations to create additional science classroom/laboratory space to address changes in State graduation requirements. e Planning for replacement of Renton High School, Dimmitt Middle School, and/or Nelson e Middle School — all aging facilities and potentially impacted by future growth. Acquisition of land for future development. e Addition and or relocation of relocatable classrooms (interim classroom space knownas e portables). Over the next six years the District will continue to implement the projects funded by the votes in the November 2022 bond. These projects include the following capacity and non-capacity projects: e Interior door hardware/lock updates e New key system Capital Construction Plan: Safety & Security 13 Main entry video intercoms e Entryway improvements to provide front door line-of-sight for office staff e Security camera updates and new installations e e Updated fire alarm and security alarm panels, devices, and systems Update seismic and structural systems in older buildings (retrofitting e and modification of existing structures to make them more resistant to seismic activity, ground motion,or soil failure) Improvements and equipment replacement of school Heating, Ventilation, and Air e Conditioning (HVAC)systems Upgrades to electrical, plumbing, and mechanical systems e Upgrades to boilers and domestic hot water heaters e Replacement of aging roofs at school buildings e Build anew high school facility for the Renton High School service area, providing e a modern learning environment and equitable athletic opportunities for all students. The District’s intent in structuring its capital improvement program is to maintain a constant level of construction throughout the program period to optimize the utilization of its management capabilities. The District utilizes a combination of in-house project management (Capital Planning and Construction Office) and outside managementconsultants to accomplish this. School Improvements Purchase Property Provide for up to forty acres for a Renton High School replacement and the e relocation of our Nutrition Services/Warehouse facility. Build New Renton High School 14 VI. SIX-YEAR FINANCE PLAN Funding for planned improvements is typically secured from several sources including voter- approved bonds or capital levies, State Construction Assistance Program funding, and impact fees. Bonds are typically used to fund the construction of new schools and other capital improvement projects and require a 60% voter approval. The District’s voters in 2019 approved a $249.6 M bond measure to fund a new elementary school (Hilltop Elementary School) to accommodate enrollment needs. Sartori Elementary School opened in 2018 as a choice school, providing additional capacity relief. The voters in November 2022 approved a $676 M bond to fund property acquisition and construction of a new Renton High School and security, seismic, and building systems updates at various schools throughout the District. State School Construction Assistance funds come from the Common School Construction Fund. The State deposits revenue from the sale of renewable resources from State school lands set aside by the Enabling Act of 1889 into the Common School Account. If these sources are insufficient to meet needs, the Legislature can appropriate General Obligation Bond funds, or the Superintendent of Public Instruction can prioritize projects for funding. School districts may qualify for State School Construction Assistance Program (SCAP) funds for specific capital projects based on a prioritization system. The District anticipates receiving approximately $28 M in SCAP funding for the Hazen High School Modernization project. Where a district is eligible, impact fees are a means of supplementing traditional funding sources for the construction of public facilities needed to accommodate new development. See Section VII School Impact Fees. The primary funding sources for all capital construction projects scheduled over the next six years include 2022 Bond funds and remaining funds from the 2022 technology/capital levy. Growth driven projects funded by impact fee revenue and 2019 bond funds are nearing completion. The majority of the recent bond funds will be directed towards land acquisition and the replacement of Renton High School. Construction of this school will not begin for two years due to the need to complete land acquisition and site preparation. If enrollment projections change to show that added capacity is needed to accommodate growth at the 9-12 grade level, the District will evaluate including the high school capacity additions as a part of a future impact fee calculation. Capacity adding projects represent only a portion of the district’s total capital improvement plan. Estimated expenditures for capacity projects over the duration of this six-year plan are indicated in Table 5 below. Funding Sources: Finance Plan: 15 |||||||| Table 5a— Six Year Finance Plan — Added New Capacity Estimated Expenditures‘ ($1,000,000's) Funding ($1,000,000's) Project 2024-2025-2026-2027-2028-2029-2030-. 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Total Secured? Unsecured? 2 2 0New Elem. School 2 HS Science 0 0 0Classrooms 0 2 2 0Land Acquisition 2 4 4 0portables 4 0 0 0 8 8 0Total 8 0 0 0 1. Estimated expenditures based on total project cost, including hard and soft costs. 2. Secured funding includes 2022 bond monies, and previously collected school impact fees. The District did not receive SCAP funds for the capacity projects identified in Table 5a. Unsecured funds include, where relevant, future school impact fees and potential bond initiatives.3. 16 |||||||| Table 5b — Six Year Finance Plan -Projects not Related to Added Capacity Funding ($1,000,000's) Estimated Expenditures' ($1,000,000's) 2030-2025-2026-2027-2028- 2 0 2 9 - 2024-Project 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Total Secured? Unsecured Total 62 97 156 192 64 18 0} 589 589 0 Estimated expenditures based on total project cost, including hard and soft costs. 1. 2. Secured funding includes 2022 bond monies. Includes approximately $28.6 M in WA State OSPI -SCAP funding. 3. Renton High School Replacement & Site Expansion 36 52 102 146 55 18 409 409 0 Hazen HS Modernization? Sierra Heights Secure Entry and Admin Remodel & Seismic Updates 10 5 20 1 20 18 3 71 6 71 6 0 0 Lindbergh HS HVAC & Seismic Updates 1 2 16 20 4 43 43 0 District-wide Safety/Security Updates 2 4 4 2 12 12 0 District-wide Seismic Updates (phase 1) District-wide HVAC Updates (phase I) District-wide Building Envelope and Roof Updates (phase 1) 3 3 2 10 5 3 7 4 3 1 4 1 2 21 18 9 21 18 9 0 0 0 17 The GMA authorizes jurisdictions to assess and collect impact fees to supplement funding of additional public facilities needed to accommodate new development. Impact fees cannot be used for the operation, maintenance,repair, alteration, or replacement of existing capital facilities used to meet existing service demands.In the case of public schools, impact fees are assessed only on residential new development. King County and the cities of Bellevue, Newcastle, and Renton currently collect impact fees on behalf of the District. Where applicable, the District calculates its impact fees in conformance with the codes of each jurisdiction. To be eligible to collect school impact fees for new capacity projects, a district must demonstrate expected grade level enrollment growth over the six-year planning period and a related need for new capacity. The school impact fee formula examines the costs of housing new students from growthby using a student generation factor, which indicates the number of students that each type of dwelling produces based on recenthistorical data. See Appendix C for detail on the student generation rates. Other factors used to calculate school impact fees include: Site Acquisition Costs -the actual or estimated cost per acre to purchase property. Building Cost — the actual or estimated cost to construct growth related facilities. Temporary Facility Cost -the actual or estimated cost per classroom to purchase and install a relocatable classroom,including site work and utilities. State Construction Assistance Program Funding Credit -the amount of funding provided by the State, subject to District eligibility, based on a construction cost allocation and funding assistance percentage established by the State. Tax Credit — the estimated amountthat a new homeowner will pay toward the school construction bond primarily funding the capacity improvement, derived from assessed property values, taxation rate, and current bond interest rates. As required by local ordinances, the District’s fee formula incorporates a fifty (50) percent “discount rate,” which operates to set the final fee at 50% of the calculated unfunded need. Table 6 below compares the District’s current impact fee with the recommended 2026 impact fee. VU. IMPACT FEES 18 | CHANGE 2026 2025 IMPACT FEES SINGLE-($1,003 $0 $1,003 FAMILY ($3,268) $0 $3,268 MULTI-FAMILY Due to the current projection of no expected grade level enrollment growth at K-5, 6-8, or 9-12, The District intends to monitor the District is not eligible to collect impact fees for 2026. enrollment growth closely and will update the CFP accordingly should the District become eligible for school impact fees in the future. Table 6 — School Impact Fees Effective Proposed January January 19 =———=— =——— t APPENDIX A —RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT MAP CES THE™ NMS= . FE aE Remy ae kat Fees Abbreviations Renton School District Map Legend Secondary Schools: Elementary Schools: Dimmitt Middle School OMS Benson Hill Elementary BHE Hazen High School HHS Bryn Mawr Elementary BME i)Renton Ue Bellevue Lindbergh High School LHS Cascade Elementary CES McKnight Middle School MMS Campbell Hill Elementary CHE Nelsen Middle School NMS Honeydew Elementary HDE ee Seatac a Kent Renton High School RHS Hazlewood Elementary HES Risdon Middle School Hilltop Heritage Elementary RMS THS HHE Talley High School Highlands Elementary HLE . Kennydale Elementary KDEKing County ee Tukwila a Lakeridge Elementary LRE Maplewood Heights Elementary MHE i Renton Park Elementary RPE City Limits Newcastle Early Learning & Specialty: Sartori Elementary SAE of Renton Meadow Crest Sierra Heights Elementary MEC SHE Early Learning Center Talbot Hill Elementary THE KC UG —Renton Academ' RAS Park Elementa -Tiffany y TPE Boundary Eyal) ie |||| | ||| ||| | |||| | «|| |||| || APPENDIX B — SCHOOL CAPACITY CHARTS Appendix B: Table 1 -Elementary School Capacity FACTORS: Student/Teacher Ratios: Grades K-1 21:1 Grade 2 22:1 Grade 3 24:1 Grades 4-5 29:1 Scheduling Efficiciency 1.00 Program Efficiency 1.00 TOTALRELOCATABLE CLASSROOMSSCHOOL PERMANENT TEACHING STATIONS 2 3 45 SPED JOTHER| CAP TOTAL] K-14 2 3 45 SPED|OTHER| CAP CAPTOTAL] K-1 32 8 3 3 6 4 8 520 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 520BENSONHILL BRYN MAWR 25 7 3 5 0 1 9 338 6 0 0 0 5 0 1 145 483 25 6 2 6 0 2 9 332 8 0 0 a 5 0 0 217 549CAMPBELLHILL 4 0 0 2 96 5634 0 7 3 10 467 6 0 0CASCADE 31 7 2 6 591 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 591HAZELWOOD 32 9 4 4 7 a2 8 4 3 7 2 8 547 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 547HIGHLANDS 0 0 0 5544 6 3 5 554 0 0 0 0 0 22 7 4 4 0 i 6 336 8 0 0 0 6 0 2 174 510HILLTOP HERITAGE 30 8 4 HONEY DEW 9 3 5 8 2 6 622 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 622KENNYDALE 33 5 29 427283986 0 0 0 1 0LAKERIDGE 26 6 3 3 4 26 1 5 2 0 2 6 402 12 0 0 3 9 0 0 333 735MAPLEWOOD HGTS.} 3 A 6 2 1 476 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 476RENTON PARK 32 7 3 7 554 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 554SARTORI 32 8 4 4 6 8 4 3 4 3 7 472 8 0 0 1 3 0 4 111 583SIERRA HGTS. 29 6 { 6 460 5 0 0 2 0 { 2 60 520TALBOT HILL 26 8 3 2 4 0 0 0 3 0 1 87 46727 8 3 3 2 2 9 380TIFFANY PARK 35 121 7,449 65 0 0 13 32 1 49 1,252 8,704TOTAL 460 117 56 54 69 RELOCATABLE CLASSROOMS TOTALLINDBERGH SERVICE PERMANENT TEACHING STATIONS 2 3 45 SPED |OTHER| CAP |TOTAL| K-1 2 3 4-5 SPED|OTHER| CAP CAPAREA TOTAL] K-1 32 8 3 3 6 4 8 520 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 520BENSONHILL 0 7 3 10 467 6 0 0 4 0 0 2 %6 563CASCADE 31 7 4 0 0 47647600 0 0 0 0RENTONPARK 32 7 3 3 2 1 8 3 3 2 2 9 380 4 0 0 0 3 0 1 87 467TIFFANY PARK 27 10 0 0 4 3 0 3 183 2,026122 30 13 9 21 11 38 1,843TOTAL TOTALRELOCATABLE CLASSROOMSHAZEN PERMANENT TEACHING STATIONS 3 45 SPED |OTHER| CAP TOTAL] K-1 2 3 4-5 SPED|OTHER| CAP CAPSERVICE AREA TOTAL] K-1 2 9 4 4 7 2 6 591 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 591HAZELWOOD 32 0 554355540 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 it 4 4 0 1 6 336 HILLTOP HERITAGE 30 8 4 4 6 8 0 0 0 6 0 2 174 510HONEY DEW 3 5 8 2 6 622 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 622KENNYDALE 33 9 26 1 5 2 0 2 6 402 12 0 0 3 9 0 0 333 735MAPLEWOOD HGTS.}| 8 4 3 4 3 7 472 8 0 0 { 3 0 4 111 583SIERRA HGTS. 29 30 0 0 4 18 0 8 618 3,595172 44 24 2 25 13 36 2,977TOTAL TOTALRELOCATABLE CLASSROOMS CAP TOTAL} K-1 2 3 45 SPED|OTHER| CAP CAPRENTON HIGH PERMANENT TEACHING STATIONS SPED|OTHER| BRYN MAWR 25 7 3 5 0 1 9 338 6 0 0 0 5 0 {145 483 25 6 2 6 0 2 9 332 SERVICE AREA TOTAL] K-1 2 3 45 8 0 0 3 5 0 0 217 549CAMPBELL HILL 0 0 0 0 0 54737285470 0 0HIGHLANDS 32 8 4 29 427283986 0 0 0 1 0 5LAKERIDGE 26 6 3 3 4 8 3 2 6 1 6 460 5 0 0 2 0 ¢ 2 60 520TALBOT HILL 26 451 2,5268 40 2,075 25 0 0 .1 1 8TOTAL 134 35 15 19 17 Appendix B: Table 2 -Middle School Capacity Appendix B: Table 3 -High School Capacity (24:1 @ Talley) Core Classes 29:1 PE 40:1 Band /Orchestra 40:1 Choir 50:1 SPED 12:1 Other 31:1 (24:1 @ Talley) Scheduling Efficiciency 0.80 Program Efficiency 0.90 FACTORS: Student/Teacher Ratios: Core Classes 29:1 PE 35:1 Band /Orchestra 40:1 Choir 50:1 SPED 12:1 Other 31:1 Scheduling Efficiency 0.83 Program Efficiency 0.95 SCHOOL FACTORS: Student/Teacher Ratios: SCHOOL J|||||| |||||]|||||||]||| ff||||| | |}||||| |||ff||| || || | SGRs I Students Housing Housing Type K-12 9-12 6-8 K-12 || K-5 9-12 6-8 «-5 Units 0.219 0.065 0.045 0.108 121 36 25 60 553 Single-family 0.214 0.046 0.038 0.131 108 23 19 66 505 Multifamily 0.213 0.043 0.037 |] 0.133 80 16 14 50 376 AptiPlex 0.217 0.054 0.039 jf 0.124 28 7 5 16 129 Townhome Notes APPENDIX C — STUDENT GENERATION RATES (SGR) The formula for determining school impact fees, as established by King County Council Ordinance 11621, requires that school districts provide “student factors based on district records of average actual student generation rates for new developments constructed over a period of not more than five years prior to the date of the fee calculation.” The Ordinance also provides that, in the event this information is not available in the District, “data from adjacent districts, districts with similar demographics, or county-wide averages must be used.” Appendix C: Table 1 -Student Generation Rates by Housing Subcategory (2025) Units built in 2024 are excluded, because they may not have been completed and occupied by October 2024, King County code Title 214.43 defines the housing types as such, “single family units shall mean single detached dwelling units, and multi-family units shail mean townhouses and apartments.” (a) The multifamily category represents all structures with five or more housing units, including the following structure types: apartment, townhome,and plex (i.e., duplex,triplex, and fourplex}. (b) The multifamily Apt/Plex subcategory includes the following structure types: apartment and plex. Sources Renton School District October 2024-25 headcount enrollment. King County GIS parcels and King County Department of Assessments assessor information. Appendix C: Table 2 -Student Generation Rates for Projects with 25+ Housing Units (2019-2023) Housing Type Project Name YearBuilt 1 Bed| 2 Bed| 3 Bed 4 Bed| 5 Bed Units K-5 Students 6-8 9-12] K-12] K-5 SGRs 6-8 9-12 K-12 Apt/Plex Leonard Place} 2019 23 21| 5 o 0 4a 12 3 0 15 ]]0.250} 0.063] 0.000] 0.313 Apt/Plex Oaks 2021 4a] 12} 0] 04 0 60 5 2 3 10 |]0.083]0.033] 0.050] 0.167 Apt/Plex Tenace 2021 73 o o wos 2 1 4 |10.019] 0.009} 0.009 | 0.037 Apt/Plex 2022 32 0 145 0.186] 0.041 0.069] 0.297 Townhome Village 2019 60 0.100 0.033] 0.067 0.200 Farms No. 06 ~ f=. f-P= --32 0,156] 0.063] 0.031 0.250 At Tiffany Park ~f.f->= |. -95 0.074] 0.021} 0.042] 0.137 Terrace ~-= -= 7 -5s? 0.102] 0.051 0.136 0.288 Lake Wash Of Eden ~ ~ ~ ~ -~ 34 0.118] 0.088} 0.059 0.265 Notes Only developments wilh 25 or more unils included. Units built in 2024 are excluded, because they may not have been completed and occupied by October 2024. King County code Title 21A.43 defines the housing types as such, “single family units shall mean single detached dwelling units, and multi-family units shall mean townhouses and apartments.” {a} The multifamily Apt/Plex subcategory includes the following structure types: apartment, and plex (i.e., duptex,triplex. and fourplex). Sources Renton SchoolDistrict October 2024-25 headcount enrollment, King County GIS parcels and King County Department of Assessments assessor information. ° Permitted Units 2019-2023 Units in the Pipeline Appendix C: Table 3 -Past & Future Housing Development 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 mi MF 706 5,590 @SF 470 136 Source City of Renton, Planning Division. Prepared by special request, April 11, 2025. Appendix C:Table 4 — Residential Development Details ID Jurisdiction Name Units Notes RI of Renton Renton MF 3,458 TBD R_2 of Renton 800 Renton MF 1,179 1(419 under construction soon R3 of Renton Triton Towers MF 900 TBD R_4 of Renton Solera MF 651 i 2025; 277 affordable units Red) of Renton MF 385 R_6 of Renton 6 MF R7 of Renton Solera Townhomes MF 90 R of Renton Camellia Court MF 72 for 2025 R9 of Renton Grant Place Townhomes MF 36 R_10 of Renton 4th Dimension MF 26 R11 of Renton Towns on 12th SF 90 has not started R 12 of Renton Lakeview Terrace SF 55 R 13 of Renton SF 21 R 14 of Renton Willowcrest Il SF 19 R 15 of Renton Christelle SF 19 recorded R 16 of Renton SF 18 R 17 of Renton Jefferson SF 13 R 18 of Renton VEK on Aberdeen SF 12 R 19 of Renton Emerald SF 10 na Oo SF 15 Total SF 272 Total MF 902 Total Units 7AT4 Notes King County code Tille 21A.43 defines the housing lypes as such, “single family units shall mean single detached dwelling units, and mulli-family units shall mean townhouses and apartments.” SF is single-family and MF is multifamily, which representsall structures with five or more housing units, including the following structure types: opariment, townhome,and plex{i.e., duplex, triplex, and fourplex). Sources City of Renton and King County. APPENDIX D —-ENROLLMENT HISTORY AND PROJECTIONS Appendix D: Table 4 -Historical Enrollment by Grade 2018-19 Grade 2018-19] 2019-20] 2020-21 2021-22} 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 to 2024-25 K 1,263 1.097 1,116 1,097 1,022 | | -255 | 1,248 1,213 1,099 1,124 1111 F-| -238 2 1,208 1.216 181 1,099 | -153 3 1,225 1.142 176 116b | -187 4 1,256 1,186 106 1,162 1,172 | -257 5 1,286 1,204 137 |. | 1,137 -140 6 1,236 113 1,052 | : “141 7 1,175 145 1,117 1,043 8 1,125 1,167 1,131 1,078 9 L118 1,123 127 1,110 ‘| 1,131 1,109 106 1,164 iW | 992 973 1,017 1,021 12 980 971 969 1,006 K-12 Total 15,172 14,918 14,433 14,383 14,125 Notes Students enrolled in Running Start full time are excluded from analysis. The lowest and highest enrollment values per grade are highlighted blue and orange,respectively. Sources Renton School District October 2018-19 to 2024-25 headcount enrollment. 2 ||| | ff= 2030-31 Grade 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 , 70 oe | . kK 30 1 2 3 4 5 b 7 8 9 os —-1,03 1,0581114 10 | 946 ; 872. s1072 1 | 892 910 : _ 9a 944 dP 2 6,027 6,044 6,076 6,210 6,273 6,352 6,509 K-5 2,938 3,008 3,057 3,127 3,162 3,194 3,143 6-8 3217 3.239 3.289 3.260 4012 4156 A201 212 12,882 12,991 13,122, 13,299 13,447 13,702 13,853 K-12 Appendix D: Table 2 -Enrollment Forecasts by Individual Grade -Middle Scenario Notes Students enrolled full-time in Running Start are excluded from analysis. Darker shading represents higher values and lighter shading represents lower values. Sources Renton School District October 2024-25 headcount enrollment and FLO 2025-26 to 2030-3] enrollment forecasts (middie scenario). APPENDIX E —-IMPACT FEE CALCULATION Due to the current projection of no expected grade level enrollment growth at K-5, 6-8, or 9- 12, the District is not eligible to collect impact fees for 2026. Exhibit E