Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA90-097 • • 12W0I1 oil U M rf'- -- —- -- r -- -- I —---�-73. —VGA— 7- ,o __i . I 1 - 1G� - —- f tme20 09 L'<iz- (-i yJ,Icopvi) pcof, I I 1 I I ' I s 1 ' i I I ill LU>l-tT`f : 1 L o-F1 03-4t"r7-- ,_17[: v-t .7„..„,—L- le' f'w 17V.00tVa FIO.,eiP•"? k v.t .-T- riPfig-fri 1 . Pagion . Auffi-24 Rii VauArti wa, io 1 I -f,,,1 1---- gr t' itevei..- 1= 1 = I= 1 T _) '_ I t I S 1 v,.3 i y ' idlio .,,,-,,-f pow, 1( -2 P-I .13-I .1 --I3I '• r > , v1 V.--I • I U NCI i iT7 Al L ih of lx.6 11-FIVI M I(iv A 0 l-eoP\/IG1 ti\\-TY tll,12 Corr-- 1,1 --. i2(ir1lvrt Olt}' UM 'T7 ) . 73.- —Mrab.— to ---i I , - --- r - -- ` ---..voor i 9= co f' _ i --4+rti lcvrrrf -- - I -- - - -- - - -- —? .—_J_1 Dill . N „)i i_. riv I i -=_ dpgii„ Z _I\ <1 ! iggix-7 1 ic2--V°121x,"? p,p_reil>"? 7474112 ti l6g-7;1 1 I . i i-PNet, . f - I rfy,i I--- Parsza • i 1 Vg-fill P'-I ) �, t` > ��' �5 Jot- .� A/E.r1u., t+,r ,70� �N� -�,ve, 0-rper,-tr - Ir I i - - - C mmr) is,.c.e Ut4I f T7 DLl eo,r OF 1P5 IHT*101p1V., ' Irc�li2�lh Call-ko L IeOk:-o'' gyp`-(3�1r tl 111 f 1 11 ., Ill I'I 11 - - 11 1 NoRTk� '�'l I II - d - I - 0. / /' \, I at-( I�J / l I /if �' II ,I II �� /° I ' \1 .. I I , ° Il 'I idauaclu (IprPaxaezt7� V,OT, 1 II I'1 i I /' I 1 T , .,,- • I I 11 t II 1 ' I I 1 -Ft -v/r- I ; 'G , _ II J' ZII I 7 — —— — f I� II 11 pef I/ '/ I i ✓"{fi/'{l , I I Ao l 1 I / ---- - I I ' • CIa — / II — \ I 1 OFJt'\;\j, 5uaa ��WAtgA v f;'la 'ill 1 'V' stub t'' v..3' _Jett-W//l Del i. ✓ 1i I q1 1/43/V,1;1y'Ric I'' I ,,,,Q -Y6 II iI 1 - 11 1, 1t 1 i 11 1 I i _,,,,,,,,„..„,_ Imgos,,,,poy, 9P�vZ 7 r •t_exttrAAg„y_t‹,t,1 t -ritztvi-' • ---(7,•W-G1 V Veg) - 177-1\iVis•lr>1 . 0 .,,4„.,;1 Oti - ,. ______) AV4I t r ,,,,,,,„7 . I ' i � I 0 0 0 0kIot%YI17rr. 4r I • I I I II 'I I II . . j !I - ba`(.„,— --� No I RTlI — _� _ gi� �� - 0 ,- i,7 7 \ . I L / er / 1 - 1. I jl ,, : Ve,i,V•114. ,, 1 I 1 /, M ' \ V . t ! • ! 0 i aKb01 2aptoji? I 1 s� Imo' II II ,, I 1 1 I` 1, I iIf I (ift-Pfd.../W7 lic1i,L,' 'fe,, - - --1 I�/ I • > I I � I . ,I I I/ / 1 I `!° i 11 / I I I r 1 ; i_____I, 1 I �..)0iN, 5Q t —� wAug £ • {-ViaY 4 Sk�ti scab ~' w.,� 11 O1•,)A., gic P I v II .l I1 1 'I I --------- - - Y-62e- .62-4=0- — - - - - A<1114-gafa 1'244044-- 00 0 _ _ _ � 4 • 3rg -IT Oa Z ►ate -rah-Z (4-1-'4V244- G )_.\,0\12Q . wi4fift$ • -J J21 %61'171..7411:1 I , . I eirihalA u1901L, • • • '► `rvrl,r11101 CITY---JF RENTON NaL z'• :.; Administrative Services Earl Clymer, Mayor Dan Clements, Director I' March 20, 1992 Mr. Carl Haglund 3308 S. Judkins Street Seattle, WA 98144 Re: Haglund Rezone, File No. R-097-90 Dear Mr. Haglund: Approval of the referenced rezone was conditioned upon the filing of two sets of restrictive covenants with King County. Enclosed for your records are recorded copies of both declarations of restrictive covenants. Please feel free to call if additional assistance is needed. Sincerely, ` •-h Marilyn J. sen, CMC City Clerk 235-2501 it 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 Ja '� ry 27, 1992 Renton City Council Minutes Page 39 CAG: 92-002, Referred 1/13/92 - The Community Services Committee recommended that ,1 Replacement Water the Mayor be authorized to sign a construction contract for municipal Booster Pump, City Hall, building domestic hot and cold water booster pumps with the MacDonald- I' MacDonald-Miller Miller Company. The work, at a cost of $25,520, has been included in the ,! 1991 budget for Municipal Campus Long-Term Space Needs. MOVED BY. NELSON, SECONDED BY SCHLITZER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. , Appointment: Human Referred 1/20/92 - The Community Services Committee recommended Rights & Affairs Council concurrence in the Mayor's appointment of Mark L. Fristo, Jr., 901 Commission Sunset Blvd. NE, #D-112, Renton, 98056, to the Human Rights and Affairs] Commission for a two-year term, expiring 4/25/93. MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY SCHLITZER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. H&HS: Sexually Referred 1/6/92 - The Community Services Committee, at its 1/21/92 Transmitted Disease meeting, received an informational briefing from representatives of the ;I Study Group Report Renton Sexually Transmitted Disease (STD) Study Group. The briefing included general information on the comparative high rates of sexually- II transmitted diseases in Renton youth, the impacts this has for the community, and the Group's intentions to develop community-based responses to this 1,1 situation. The Committee agreed that this issue be referred to the Committee of the Whole for a complete briefing by the Renton STD Study Group, and recommended Council concurrence. MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY SCHLITZER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Finance Committee Finance Committee Chairman Mathews presented a report recommending Vouchers approval of payment claims checks #86431 through 86889 and five wire transfers totaling $2,298,970.18, and payroll vouchers #105424 through ill 105786, and 271 direct deposits, in the amount of $903,837.47. MOVED B,.Y MATHEWS, SECONDED BY SCHLITZER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN APPROVAL OF THE VOUCHERS. CARRIED. 'i Plannin2 & Develonment Planning and Development Committee 1991 Chairman Mathews presented the Committee following Committee reports: Citizen Comment: ] Referred 12/16/91 - The Planning and Development Committee. Il Haglund - Rezone, 4016 recommended to the City Council in favor of the petition by Carl Haglund!to Jones Avenue, R-097-90 rezone his 1.32 acre property at NE 40th and Jones Avenue from R-1 (Single-Family Residential) to B-1 (Business District), to be consistent with' the Comprehensive Plan designation for this site. The Committee approval of this rezone action is conditioned upon a restrictive covenant which ensures that Mr. Haglund will agree to support the area-wide commercial zoning designation proposed for the subject property under the revised 1992 Comprehensive Plan, and to abide by any revised use restrictions on the property because of a change of permitted uses or changled development requirements under that Plan. With this zoning change, the existing legal non-conforming office use on the site (which has been in place since approximately 1978) will become a conforming use. No redevelopment is intended to take place under this rezone action; Mr. Haglund has previously provided a restrictive covenant Januaiv 27, 1992 Renton City Council Minutes Page 40 agreeing to apply for environmental and site plan approval for any changes to the existing structure or to the existing use. The Committee hereby submitted the proposed rezone to Council for first reading on 1/27/92. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY EDWARDS, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT.* In response to Councilman Stredicke's inquiry, Senior Planner Lenora Blauman said that this rezone would change the property's designation but not its use. She advised that a restrictive covenant, signed by Mr. Haglund, requires environmental and site plan review for any change in the use or the exterior of the building. She further stated that the property would be subject to benefit zone fees in effect at the time an application is made. *MOTION CARRIED. (See Page 42 for ordinances on first reading.) Rezone: Northward Referred 1/25/92 - The Planning and Development Committee met and Development (The considered a resolution proposed by the Planning/Building/Public Works Orchards), NE 4th St., R- Department that would modify the intent of Ordinance No. 3795, adopted 018-82 3/12/84, which approved the reclassification of properties on the Orchards site from G-l (General Use) to R-1 (Single-Family Residential), R-2 and R- 3 (Multi-family Residential). That ordinance required the applicant to apply for a Planned Unit Development (PUD) as a condition of the rezone to ensure an approved site plan that would be binding. At that time, the City had not yet adopted its Site Plan Review Ordinance (Ordinance No. 3981, 1986). The proposed resolution would allow City staff to make a determination that the intent of Ordinance No. 3795 (Northward Rezone) would be achieved by site plan review (RMC 4-31-33). The Committee recommended adoption of the resolution. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY EDWARDS, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY SCHLITZER, THE RESOLUTION BE PLACED ON THE 2/3/92 AGENDA FOR READING AND ADOPTION. CARRIED. Transportation Referred 12/16/91 - Transportation Committee 1991 Chairman Edwards Committee presented a report stating that the Committee recommended Council approval Streets: Speed Limits, to amend Section 10-11-1.0 of the City Code to include: 17. Oakesdale Oakesdale Avenue SW & Avenue Southwest from Monster Road Southwest to Southwest 43rd Street. Benson Drive S. The Committee also recommended that Section 10-11-1.E, Part 2, be deleted and that Section 10-1-1.C, Part 16, be rewritten to read: "On Benson Drive South between the south City limits to South Puget Drive." The Transportation Committee recommended the ordinance for first reading. MOVED BY EDWARDS, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT.* In response to Councilman Stredicke's inquiry, Mr. Edwards said that the intent of the ordinance is change the speed limit on Oakesdale and Benson Drive from 25 mph to 35 mph. *MOTION CARRIED. (See Page 42 for ordinances on first reading.) Transportation (Aviation) Committee Chairman Stredicke presented the following reports: •'January 27, 1992 Renton City Council Minutes Page 42 Legal: Control of Junk Councilman Stredicke stated that on 12/2/91, he had requested legislation to Cars, Recreational regulate the parking of junk cars, large recreational vehicles, boats, etc. in Vehicles, Boats, Etc. in the yards of single-family residential areas and the screening of such Residential Yards eyesores. He requested further review of the proposed draft ordinance to ensure that his concerns regarding screening were adequately addressed. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY EDWARDS, COUNCIL REFER THE DRAFT ORDINANCE TO THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Board/Commission: Senior Responding to Councilman Stredicke's inquiry as to why the Senior Housing Housing Bond Issue Bond Issue document did not include a provision that one percent of the total cost of construction be used for the selection, acquisition, and or installation of art as stipulated in the City Code, Mayor Clymer said that the Administration will investigate this matter and report back to Council. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS The following ordinances were presented for first reading and will be adopted at the next Council meeting. Public Works: Sanitary An ordinance was read amending Section 8-5-1, 8-5-2.D, 8-5-6, 8-5-7, 8-5- Sewer Update in City 11, 8-5-15.C, 8-5-19, and adding a new Section 8-5-21, to Chapter 5, Code Sewers, of Title VIII (Health and Sanitation) of the City Code, relating to sewers and sewer requirements. Utility: Storm & Surface An ordinance was read amending Section 4-22-16 of Chapter 22, Storm and Water Drainage Water Drainage, of Title IV (Building Regulations) of the City Code, relating Ordinance Amendment to alternates, modifications, and appeals of storm water utilities. Citizen Comment: An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of 1.32 acres at NE Haglund - Rezone, 4016 40th and Jones Avenue from R-1 (Single-Family Residential) to B-1 Jones Avenue, R-097-90 (Business District) (Haglund rezone; File No. R-097-90). Streets: Speed Limits, An ordinance was read amending Sections 10-11-1.0 and 10-11-1.E, of Oakesdale Avenue SW & Chapter 11, Speed Limits, of Title X (Traffic), of the City Code, establishing Benson Drive S. speed limits on Oakesdale Avenue Southwest and Benson Drive South at thirty-five miles per hour. The following resolutions were presented for reading and adoption: Resolution #2877 A resolution was read endorsing the Renton School District bond issues, Finance: Renton School Proposition No. 1 (Maintenance and Operations Levy), and Proposition No. 2 District Levy & Bond ( Construction Bond); and urging a "Yes" vote on them on the 2/4/92 ballot. Issue, 2/4/92 Election MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED UNANIMOUSLY, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. Resolution #2878 A resolution was read establishing a procedure and schedule for processing of Planning: Comprehensive land use amendments and rezone applications for completion of the Plan Land Use Element Comprehensive Land Use Element. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, Schedule & Procedure SECONDED BY EDWARDS, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. Resolution #2879 A resolution was read extending and declaring a moratorium for connections Public Works: Sanitary to sanitary sewers within the South Highlands, Maplewood, and Heather Sewer Moratorium Downs drainage basins to expire 8/31/93 (Amends Resolution #2764 adopted Extension in Highlands 7/17/89). MOVED BY TANNER, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ.* • • APOVE D PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE /-�7i9a COMMITTEE REPORT JANUARY 27, 1992 CARL HAGLUND REZONE (R 097-90) (Referred December 16, 1991) The Planning and Development Committee recommends to City Council in favor of the petition by Carl Haglund to rezone his 1.32 acre property at N.E. 40th and Jones Avenue from R-1 to B-1, to be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Designation for this site. The Planning and Development Committee approval of this rezone action is conditioned upon the attached duly signed and executed covenant (approved by the City Attorney) which ensures that Mr. Haglund (and his heirs, assigns, designees and successors) will agree to support the area-wide commercial zoning designation proposed for the subject property under the revised 1992 Comprehensive Plan, and to abide by any revised use restrictions on the property because of a change of permitted uses or changed development requirements under that Plan. With this zoning change, the existing legal non-conforming office use on the site (which has been in place since approximately 1978) will become a conforming use. No redevelopment is intended to take place under this rezone action; Mr. Haglund has previously provided a duly signed and executed covenant (approved by the City Attorney) agreeing to apply for environmental and site plan approval for any changes to the existing structure or to the existing use. The Planning and Development Committee hereby submits the proposed rezone to Council for first reading on January 27, 1992. fla1o206 . Nancy Math ws, Chair c-;61 10,6_ Bob Edwards, Vice-Chair Ok eezgiepi at y Keolk r-Wheeler, Member cc: Lenore Blauman Don Erickson it • CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO . 4341 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM R-1 (SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) TO B-1 (BUSINESS DISTRICT) (HAGLUND REZONE; FILE NO .R-097-90) . WHEREAS, under Chapter 31 (Zoning Code) of Title IV (Building ; Regulations ) of Ordinance No . 4260 known as the "Code of General,ll' Ordinances of the City of Renton, " as .. amended, and the maps and'l reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the property hereinbelowiil described has heretofore been zoned as R-1; and WHEREAS, a proper petition for change of zone classification ofi said property has been filed with the Planning Division on or about, August 15 , 1990 , which petition was duly referred to the hearing? examiner for investigation, study, and public hearing, and a public hearing having been held thereon on or about February 7 , 1991 , and; said matter having been duly considered by the hearing examiner, and said zoning request being in conformity with the city' s1 comprehensive plan, as amended, and the city council having duly , considered all matters relevant thereto, and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto; and WHEREAS, the City Council has concerns about the timeliness of this rezone since amendments to the Comprehensive Plan are proposed and there are changes also proposed in the permitted uses in the B-d Zone, or alternatively, the B-1 Zone may be split into several zoning categories; and 1 ORDINANCE NO. 4341 WHEREAS, the City Council resolves the issue of timeliness by requiring further restrictive covenants from the property owner requiring the owner to comply with changes in the Comprehensive Plan and/or changes in the permitted uses under the ultimate zoning H category. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, .' WWASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS : SECTION I . The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby rezoned to B-1 , as hereinbelow specified, subject„II to the findings , conclusions, and decision of the hearing examiner dated February 11, 1991 , and subject further to restrictive 11 covenants filed under King County Auditor' s File No.. 9110070843 and under King County Auditor' s File No . 9201301568 and which said covenants are hereby incorporated and made a part ': hereof as if fully set forth, the Planning Manager is hereby , authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance-, H as amended, to evidence said rezoning, to-wit : See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as. if fully set forth herein . (57 , 584 sq. - ft . of property being located at 4016 Jones Avenue N.E . ) SECTION II . This Ordinance• shall be effective upon its1 passage, approval, and five days after its publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 3rd day of February 19 9//2 Marilyn J e 'ersen, City Clerk 2 • • ORDINANCE NO. 4341 APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 3rd day of February 19922 Earl Clymer, Mayo Approvfas to form: 411, L- ence J. Wa n, City Attorney Date of Publication: February 7 , 1992 ORB. 207 : 1/23/92 : as . • . III EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SOUTH 1/2 OF LOT 9 IN BLOCK 2 AND THE EAST 1/2 OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF LOT 9 IN BLOCK 2 OF C.D. HILLMAN'S LAKE. WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN, DIVISION NO. 7 AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 16 OF PLATS, PAGE 18 RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON TOGETHER WITH ALL THAT PORTION OF LINCOLN PLACE NE AS VACATED BY CITY OF RENTON ORDINANCE 2961 THAT WOULD ATTACH BY OPERATION OF LAW TO SAID LOT 9 OF C. D. HILLMAN'S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN DIVISION NO. 7. II D:91-772:MD: s P • . . - . . , • . . • • . . , • •- . . 0"/ ' -."1::7/ ''' :,11j;Vi .:'-''41'.z .1'1 ',I.BP.*W.-;.; • t ; ill yi CITY OF RENTON ZONING MAP •I r/•;:".. •••,,,, / -''.'4.4,,,,,. • •:':::g... f.it:T:7:::2L ______ u j 1 • - .. :::......;lak:F"tT:::SAIV. R 1(/) ZONING MAP LEGEND PROPOSED REZONE AREA,:::;:',:ifligSair:it::•cl I / • SYMBOL DISTRICT. USE ..• ... -.. ••• . /..•--::..,--'2./.„..-,.-:.') A-t?„,7 -'4.04€4.4.0,,,,-;,:r.. ....T.-:. , . ,s,- ,.-...-..A.:..::,;..,:f 4p -,.,- / NI . .. .. ...... ....., . z•-z; , G-1 RESIDENTIAL - SINGLE-FAMILY • -,?' .3-0-4..; , Nil. ST \it.14r114:;;.,.;....1k , . R-1 RESIDENTIAL - -SINGLE-FAMILY MIAMI - .1 I-11 . - - . I— RESIDENTIAL - TWO-FAMILY • - ,3- ~Mill I R-2 ABE T R-1 8 4111111111 - 1-1 ,-, , L..., -= ...0- . R,.. .t.,:s. :•-',0,-60. RESIDENTIAL - MULTIPLE-FAMILY .• Pc-R7,i,,a Z . . 1111111111111111111 tJ 1 = c> 6dqUP iiiiii MEI Raini _1 I --- irt11,51 RESIDEN11AL --' MULTIPLE-FAMILY HIM AMMIIIIIBMWS1 -1 ig _ , e • ..„ ......... , • 0 . ..,,....-,........, NL. 111 36th ST . mg PUBLIC USE MN IIIIMISIN17111%1 _ , ' p7 1 -; ,,,,-..„: BUSINESS USE t: ..re.;,_. . : • AY 41I 10-- -I — .'- I I I r.c.--:••.:t• . .. • I I I I HU I I - J ›- -‹ • 1::::64‘,41 OFFICE PARK _] NI341-ti 41 1 1 tq 3 ' kg,4.,-,.4\, ' • --c R-1 - 1. ....„1 • • -c',1 . •. . .1•.... E i I ,11:5Wiq- ___J 1 ..._7..,Ait7 1 ::tr":: ')'t ' .1 G-1 - NE-33rd Sr 1:: 1 : LIGHT INDUSTRIAL 11 I 14-p-311, sY 1 1 taiti MANUFACTURING PARK co -.-.k.::4;:•.0 I NIIMAS -- I I I I -2:1 flee4ii$ .ilikl ,. . liffa . HEAVY INDUSTRIAL , M_111111111111111AR1_1111111 NE 31st ST :3-• • . immiltsL 11111111. - • 111011".1 ----- :;:,mr.viiiii I kiql.lifil•iii TRAILER PARK ..t.F•:,i.•,m4m-: 111111111_11111.11911.111111 - G-1,____ :::::::4. , - MliffiliniligUEUM fi,....i • Cp ,y....•z ------•-- ;,-.,........, lit - CITY LIMITS sit -*.t..4,•,..:.t.: G-1 IMPORTANT CHECK EACH REZONE ORDINANCE II I h I V t ill_. .L _...±.,1 •.tF.- ::iii:,•:.k,-.i.F? \,oes.frir",/.," . • FOR POSSIBLE RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS • ssf /A DEPARTMENT OF RLANNING/BUILONCUPUBUC WORKS r-Yrn64—P-W I 1 \ _1-4- 1 ift ----- ----- • NE 2e th ST --I n G-1 . II 111111 111 WILLIl'f'24 '--- G R-1 R-1- , IA A.:)-- DEVELOPMENT BERMES DP(ISKM PAGE . __ -PK___,. • SCALE! 1' x 600' _. • __ __ • ' . . . . . , • - FILED,-FOR RECORD AT REQUEST OF R-097-90 Office of the City Clerk • Renton Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 RESTRICTIVE COVENANT N N � W WHEREAS, the undersigned is the owner of certain real CD Ui rn property within the city limits of the City. of Renton located at, co Jones Avenue and N. E . 40th Street, legally described as follows ; and See Attachment A which is incorporated herein as if . fully set forth WHEREAS, the property has an existing non-conforming office use which would become conforming should the property be rezoned' to B-1; and WHEREAS, the City of Renton is in the process of adopting al new Comprehensive Land Use Plan which designates this property as a commercial use; and WHEREAS, the City of Renton is in the process of revising the definitions of uses allowed in commercial zones and/or creating additional and different commercial zones; and WHEREAS, without a restrictive covenant that the owner would . abide by and support the area-wide commercial zoning designation proposed for the subject property with a revised definition of use allowed in commercial zones or limitations on uses permitted in additional commercial zones; and WHEREAS, the owner wishes to impose such a restrictive covenant to convince the city that this rezone is timely. NOW, THEREFORE, comes the - undersigned owner and imposes upon the property legally described hereinabove the following restrictive covenant . The property owner , and the owners , heirs , RESTRICTIVE COVENANT-HAGLUND - Page 1 I assigns , designees and successors in interest do hereby covenant ' and agree to support the area-wide commercial zoning designation " proposed for the subject property under the revised 1992 Comprehensive Plan and to abide by any revised use restrictions on the property because of a change of permitted uses under the commercial zone or any changes in use or additional or changed development requirements or restrictions because of the creation of additional commercial zoning categories which might be applied "' to the subject rop rty. �� day of \3 f/ 199 DATED TH I y }, , • ;j . • i ../ . . �A1 r AG�(TND STATE OF WASHINGTON ) . ss i COUNTY OF KING' ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that CARL , HAGLUND signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his free' and voluntary act for :the uses and purposes mentioned in the! instrument . i DATED: 000._4 .a )2 , 1992 . 3 9(--(•,---. , of y_24 P blic in and for the Sta of Wa . ' A ton, residing at u� - My appointment expires : /i-aS-9S CITY9 : 20 : as . I RESTRICTIVE COVENANT-HAGLUND - Page 2 • EXHIBIT "A" • LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SOUTH 1/2 OP LOT 9 IN BLOCK 2 AND THE EAST 1/2 OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF LOT 9 IN BLOCK 2 OF C.D. HILLMAN'S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN, DIVISION NO. 7 AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 16 OF PLATS, PAGE 18 RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON TOGETHER WITH ALL THAT PORTION OF LINCOLN PLACE NE AS VACATED BY CITY OF RENTON ORDINANCE 2961 THAT WOULD ATTACH BY OPERATION OF LAW TO SAID. LOT 9 OF C. D. HILLMAN'S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN DIVISION NO. 7. 0:91-772:MD:ps • • II • I ' • • • • • • • • • • • . CITY OFN(TO ( !� ..•�i� � ,:i:} �:;�°: I L l I ZONING MAP � ,#:: if. L �i= • /64:�% C :'r4.:�!::;. • N ZONING MAP LEGEND:% ;,.�ie�. ,.:;:s:: :,;.. R-I> I / SYMBOL DISTRICT USE PROPOSED REZONE AREA :' + " �:'"'•-°I . -d • • "```" ""�` y RESIDENTIAL - SINGLE-FAMILY • ���4,:. "• �+1 •• I - itj :'•:�� RESIDENTIAL - SINGLE-FAMILY ,�� • tea' _ I l- I R-2. RESIDENTIAL - TWO-FAMILY ,,t �■■1 I z �L. K. 8 1 1 I 3 R_1 0 ` sNAM� ��TI W J Gy3 7 'kilt RESIDENTIAL - MULTIPLE-FAMILY it 1Y ��I� /�O,1111a"1 I 1 II = • D1P4'g , RESIDENTIAL - MULTIPLE-FAMILY It12l� • ( 1 mil ).1 1 ). �a ��, AME�11�i�L � `7 I ` ST PUBLIC USE ■� I6Ih �� .rw�7 •. MINI Meg . 1411111N ' II . c° [ 1-1I ;r•"=E -.±� BUSINESS USE III I I 6r I ��ftW I I `" OFFICE PARK (I r Ih U��II I 1 Q =o- z, II I (Y I ���lI :331i[Ili Il. � ,,ik � N R-1 I LIGHT INDUSTRIAL Id, fare ;I NE S rd S[w V _ ci � .I f '" I MANUFACTURING PARK II IYfi �.;;: HEAVY INDUSTRIAL II l ( LAIN. ^1[ �I • \ •NE 31st ST •�- (.:r:��n U1I�llle�1111!!�I�1■ - _� 4;itae TRAILER PARK ,,.. pil � CITY LIMITS• liiiIIIBINI1sU� G-�-- _ __ E ORDINANCE �11�pvfi1;11121.111.. - _u ' , IMPORTANT CHECK EACH REZON. • / G-I FOR POSSIBLE RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS l l I t Ir p- a:• E; �. / OF PLAR141NQ/BURl-DRIQ/POBIJC WORKS :r+ �r� DEPAR7f tEN7 P� R-1 (I�II I11i 2f�Tl'T4 [ 11.1 ip a I. :: t 11 R-� �E 2�th ST G-1 • A + D�vrZOPs x7 SERVICES ocvu,o1+ ';� II UI111 111 I llll l l -'N r�0: tiITT ,ocro7 scr.o,�__ SCALE: 1' X 600' r'I<<ED VOR RECORD AT REQUEST 7 R-097-90 Office of the City Clerk 1, Renton Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 RESTRICTIVE COVENANT WHEREAS, the undersigned is the owner of certain real property within the city limits of the City of Renton located at Jones Avenue and N.E . 40th Street, legally described as follows; and See Attachment A which is incorporated herein as. if fully set forth WHEREAS, the property has an existing non-conforming office j use which would become conforming should the property be rezoned Q,Q, to B-l; and 1.4 WHEREAS, the .,City of Renton is in the process of adopting a O new Comprehensive Land Use Plan which designates this property as a commercial use; and 0) WHEREAS, the City of Renton is in the process of revising the definitions of uses allowed in commercial. zones and/or creating additional and different commercial zones; and WHEREAS, without a restrictive covenant that the owner would abide by and support the area-wide commercial 'zoning designation proposed for the subject property with a revised -definition of use allowed in commercial .zones or limitations on uses permitted in ; OC additional commercial zones; and 2 WHEREAS, the owner wishes to impose such a restrictive x covenant to convince the city that this rezone is timely. 0. I p 1 NOW, THEREFORE, comes the undersigned owner and imposes upon the property legally described hereinabove the following 47 m restrictive covenant. The property owner and the owners, heirs, 177 RESTRICTIVE COVENANT-HAGLUND - Page 1 J I - I EXHIBIT "A" - i LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SOUTH 1/2 OF LOT 9 IN BLOCK 2 AND THE EAST 1/2 OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF LOT 9 IN BLOCK 2 OF C.D. HILLMAN'S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN, DIVISION NO. 7 AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 16 OF PLATS, PAGE 18 RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON TOGETHER WITH ALL THAT PORTION OF LINCOLN PLACE NE AS VACATED BY CITY OF RENTON ORDINANCE 2961 THAT WOULD ATTACH BY OPERATION OF LAW TO SAID LOT 9 OF C. D. HILLMAN'S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN DIVISION NO. 7. D:91-772:MD:ps - W 0 I O • 9201301568 ' N ref,.. ,-,::::,. n CITY OF t ' � :,IA r -- •I` ZONING MAP "- ./ ZONING M LEGEND PROPOSED REZONE AREA _ ' = F_y 'l• R-1Q . l I SYMBOL DISTRICT USE sr ' t '` - • lSINGLE-FAMILY •`� ' ® :.;,. f,.tL `: I -.• 4o C `,r' A % • ' k ' M1, CVJ G-1 I RESIDENTIAL �� w'..,n.,.1 ' / .• ST R-1 RESIDENTIAL - SINGLE-FAMILY mot �� — L— I1eg 8-‹ ,I � RESIDENTIAL - TWO-FAMILY 3 d4'yM _ I Z �� �. R-2. CM� R-1 0 jf RESIDENTIAL - MULTIPLE-FAMILY • /�l`YII�iJl�ll �T I z I kR � . II�III11111!!!! 1 I r — 111 �t� F=.=t RESIDENTIAL = MULTIPLE-FAMILY Abmm,� • — i. IL:LLJ::J �MM NCMf�om I - -� PUBLIC USE 4. �1r _m • /���1M'IP�''i111"NII�•� � I 36th ST i -� • �j Co I :-;, BUSINESS USE Y i Q =O-F?,` OFFICE PARK • - N I Y� �9 ► I 1 N 3 R-1 '" � r `� L�:11' LIGHT INDUSTRIAL w I�IOirIL'111M9�11 Il 1 + _,;. NE Ord S r m I ki F L `t G-1 ;:M1, MANUFACTURING PARK I t S� 1 11 � L�II 111 ) ( ��� HEAVY INDUSTRIAL I 1 (1 LEI Z( -l-1 l I � .;� , I•IIRIII JUII,IIIUIU Mil ■ -NE 31st ST 11111111111tL'IPJ{1111111 -\�� _..„ TRAILER PARK 1111111li111it1s�1♦ 1'-� ` � --- --- CITY LIMITS • 1I��Y1jll12l�lll�. -�__ 40 W. , G-1 IMPORTANT CHECK EACH REZONE ORDINANCE II I I �t if T) `�`, 1 :; �:`�� FOR POSSIBLE RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS I ��// DEPARTMENT OF PUltRI1GBUELDiNG/PUBUC WORKS ':+e:.i'! .��� PAGE r-i=�L=�L-�- '_'��..,.`1 G�1 ••/ ' R_1 R-1 ti`� . PAGE. 9 I I 2:t1 �1; .... 1 �E 2E th ST l n G-1 04. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIYtSKM �...,I SCALE 1' ■'600' •ANT,$ ING rf pn./PV MOW.,sCrViCa_ • • - - — _ assigns, designees and successors in interest do hereby covenant and agree to support the area-wide commercial zoning ' designation proposed for the subject property under the revised 1992 Comprehensive Plan and to abide by any revised use restrictions on the property because of a change of permitted uses under the commercial zone or any changes in use or additional or changed development requirements or restrictions because of the creation of additional commercial zoning categories which might be applied to the subject ro ty. DATED THI day of c,l mac: , 199 . CAAG ND ..! PI .4 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) S�9 - ) ss COUNTY OF KING ) f4 I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that CARL 41) HAGLUND signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the , instrument. DATED: (:2O ua a , 1992 . C.Gu c��1i%L(,�t of y P blic in and for the Sta of Wa ' ton, residing aty ,, My appointment expires : it-aS-9S / CITY9 : 20 :as . RESTRICTIVE COVENANT-HAGLUND - Page 2 C'TY OF RENTON. WASHING ON ORDINANCE NO. 4341 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION•OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM R-1 (SINGLE- FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) TO B-1 (BUSI- NESS DISTRICT)(HAGLUND REZONE; FILE NO. R-097-90). WHEREAS, under Chapter 31 (Zoning Code) of Title IV (Building Regulations) of Ordinance No.4260 known as the"Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton," as amended, and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the prop- erty hereinbelow described has heretofore been zoned as r-1; and WHEREAS, a proper petition for change of zone'classification of said property has been filed with the Planning Division on or about August 15, 1990, which petition was duly referred to the hearing examiner for investigation,study, and public hearing,and a public hearing having been held thereon on or about February 7, 1991, and said matter having been duly considered by the hearing examiner, and said zoning request being in conformity with the city's compre- hensive plan, as amended, and the city council having duly considered all matters relevant thereto. and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto; and WHEREAS, the City Council has con- cerns about the timeliness of this rezone since amendments to the Comprehensive Plan are proposed and there are changes also proposed in the permitted uses in the B-1 Zone, or alternatively the B-1 Zone may be split into several zoning categories; and WHEREAS,the City Council resolves the issue of timeliness by requiring further restrictive covenants from the property own- er requiring the owner to comply with changes in the Comprehensive Plan and/or changes in the permitted uses under the ultimate zoning category. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUN- CIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASH- INGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby rezoned to B-1, as hereinbelow specified, subject to the findings, conclusions, and decision of the hearing examiner dated Feb- ruary 11, 1991, and subject further to restrictive covenants filed under King Coun- ty Auditor's File No. 9110070843 and under King County Auditor's File No.9201301568, and which said covenants are hereby incor- porated and made a part hereof as if fully set forth, the Planning Manager is hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to evidence said rezoning, to-wit: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein. (57,584 sq. ft. of property being located at 4016 Jones Avenue N.E.) SECTION II. This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and five days after its publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 3rd day of February, 1992. Marilyn J. Petersen, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 3rd day of February, 1992. Earl Clymer, Mayor Approved as to form: ' Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SOUTH 1/2 OF LOT 9 IN BLOCK 2 AND THE EAST 1/2 OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF LOT 9 IN BLOCK 2 OF C.D. HILLMAN'S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN, DIVISION NO. 7 AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 16 OF PLATS, PAGE 18 RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON TOGETHER WITH ALL THAT PORTION OF LINCOLN PLACE NE AS VACATED BY CITY OF RENTON ORDINANCE 2961 THAT WOULD ATTACH BY OPERATION OF LAW TO SAID LOT 9 OF C. D. HILL- MAN'S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN DIVISION NO. 7. Published in the Valley Daily News Feb- ruary 7, 1992. 7036 • AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Dolores E. Ashbaugh ,being first duly sworn on oath acct. 050640 states that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the VALLEY DAILY NEWS - - - 600 S. Washington Kent, WA. 98032 Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week. That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published in the English language continually as a daily newspaper in - Kent, King County, Washington. The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Valley Daily News (and not in supplement form) which was regularly distrib- uted to the subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed noticea public notice 07036-City of Renton , ordinance 04341 was published on February 7 , 1 99 2 The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $ 1 2 2 . 9 3 A. Subscribed and sworn before thi • day of Feb.f,' 19 92 NOy Public for the State of Washington residing at Kent King County, Washington VDN/H83 Revised 11/91 • 7 CITY' F RENTON Administrative Services Earl Clymer, Mayor Dan Clements, Director February 4, 1992 Mr. Carl- Haglund 3308 S. Judkins Street Seattle, WA 98144 Re: Haglund Rezone, R-097-90 Dear Mr. Haglund: At the regular Council meeting of February 3, 1992, the Renton City Council adopted Ordinance No. 4341 approving the referenced rezone. A copy is enclosed for your records. Copies of the restrictive covenants bearing the recording number will be mailed to you upon receipt from King County. Please call if I can provide additional assistance or information. Sincerely, 107, . Marilyn J. rsen, CMC City Clerk 235-2502 cc: Mayor Earl Clymer Council President Kathy Keolker-Wheeler Lenore Blauman, Senior Planner Fred Kaufman, Hearing Examiner 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 February 3. 1992 , . Renton City Council Minutes Page 53 12) Seek authorization for a sentencing judge to allow public agencies the authority to charge a person up to $1,000 for emergency responses to incidents caused by impairment from drug or alcohol use. 13) Support legislation which reduces the blood alcohol legal intoxication standard to .08. The Committee further recommended that the City of Renton support an interim reform of the Metro Council and endorse placement of a regional governance measure on the November, 1992, ballot as recommended by the SCA. The interim reform measure proposes appointment of seven members to the Metro Council from the County, seven from the City of Seattle, seven; from suburban cities, three elected at-large, one representative from sewer districts, and a chair selected by the Council. MOVED BY KEOLKER- WHEELER, SECONDED BY EDWARDS, COUNCIL ADOPT THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Public Works: Pesticide In response to Council President Keolker-Wheeler's inquiry, Executive Control, HB2531 Assistant Covington stated that the City of Renton and other agencies lobbied against proposed legislation which would have removed regulation of pesticides from local control (HB2531), and that the Bill has died for lack of; support. Mr. Covington stated further that the Administration will continue to monitor legislation regarding this issue. Public Works: Sign In response to Councilman Stredicke's inquiry regarding a sign violation at Violation, Honeydew the Honeydew Apartments, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator Apartments Guttmann reported that the matter being investigated. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS The following ordinances were presented for second and final reading and adoption. All ordinances were on first reading on 1/27/92. Ordinance #4341 An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of 1.32 acres at NE Rezone: Haglund, 4016 I 40th and Jones Avenue from R-1 (Single-Family Residential) to B-1 Jones Avenue, R-097-90 (Business District) (Haglund rezone; File No. R-097-90). MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS PRESENTED.* Responding to Councilman Stredicke's request that the record show the conditions of property owner's agreement with the City, Mr. Haglund advised that he has signed restrictive covenants that require environmental and site plan review for any change in the property use or the exterior of the building, and that subject him to any benefit zone fees in effect at the time, an application is made. *ROLL CALL: SIX AYES: KEOLKER-WHEELER, EDWARDS, SCHLITZER, MATHEWS, NELSON, TANNER. ONE NAY: STREDICKE. MOTION CARRIED. Ordinance #4342 An ordinance was read amending Section 4-22-16 of Chapter 22, Storm and Utility: Storm & Surface ; Water Drainage, of Title IV (Building Regulations) of the City Code, relating Water Drainage to alternates, modifications, and appeals of storm water utilities. Ordinance Amendment Responding to Councilman Stredicke's inquiry, City Attorney Warren advised that this ordinance provides the Planning/Building/Public Works Department with the opportunity to consider alternative available technology for the design of storm and surface water drainage. FA M E ,� O TO: LC. Was eer DEPT: Cdaj MADV1AshFAX#: 255' 64/4 PAGES FROM: L'D' . w PHONE: CO: FAX#: Post.It'"brand fax transmittal memo 7671 CITY-OF-RENTON ----- - MEMORANDUM DATE: January 17, 1992 TO: Lawrence J.Warren, City Attorney FROM: Donald K. Erickson, Principal Planner STAFF: Lenora Blauman, Project Manager irii.710 • I I SUBJECT: Haglund Rezone (97-90) • The Planning and Development Committee, at its meeting of January 16, 1992, considered a petition by Carl Haglund to rezone a 1.32 acre property located at Jones Avenue and N.E.40th Street from R-1 to B-1, Commercial Use. The purpose of this rezone is to permit an existing non-conforming office use to become a conforming development. Mr. Haglund has no plans to change or expand the use at this time, and has provided a covenant (which has been approved by your office) agreeing to submit applications for environmental and land use review, should he be interested in making any change at a future date. The Planning and Development Committee was concerned about the timeliness of the rezone. Specifically,, Committee members noted that, while the site is designated for commercial use on both the existing and anticipated Comprehensive Plan Maps, plans to revise definitions of uses allowed in commercial zones could affect future redevelopment of the site. To address that concern, Committee members agreed that it would be necessary to obtain a covenant from the applicant agreeing to support commercial designations/allowed uses approved by Council for this site. The Committee asked that you develop specific language for a covenant based upon the following premises: The property owner(and his heirs and assignees) do hereby covenant and agree to support the area wide commercial zoning designation proposed for the subject property under the revised 1992 Comprehensive Plan,and to abide by commercial development restrictions approved for the property under that revised Comprehensive Plan, as adopted by City Council. • The applicant has agreed to sign such a covenant. We would appreciate your early attention to this matter so that the existing Planning and Development Committee can act to approve the covenant during the week of January 20th, and to,then, bring a . recommendation in favor of the rezone to the full Council at its meeting of January 27th. If you have questions or need additional information, please telephone us. Thank you for your consideration. a �1 :: rmr CITY RENT V017-q0 Renton City Council Earl Clymer, Mayor PLANNING D1ViSiON • CII( OF RENT ON • JAN i 7 15.12 • January 7 , 1992 ' I • Mr. Carl Haglund 3308' S. Judkins Street Seattle, Washington 98144 Dear Mr. Haglund: At the regular Council meeting of December 16, 1991, the Renton City Council voted to reconsider the ordinance adopting the referenced rezone, which was denied at the Council meeting of December 9, 1991. The rezone file and accompanying ordinance were referred to the Council's ' Planning and. Development Committee for review. The Planning and Development Committee will meet to review this matter on Thursday, January 16, 1992, at 3:30 pm in the sixth floor conference room of City Hall. You are welcome to attend the meeting. If you have any questions, please phone the Council secretary at 235-2586. Sincerely, Nancy Ma ews, Chair Planning and Development Committee • NM: bd cc: Parties of Record 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2586 , / 01TYOF RENTON December 10, 1991 DEC. Y � ���� -� ' ° ^w*x 3308 S. Judkins St 'ICUIVED Seattle, WA 98144 7/CLERKSQFRCE (206) 329-7601 Toni Nelson Renton City Council 200 Mill Ave S Renton , WA q8055 RE: Haglund Rezone 4016 Jones Ave NE Renton , WA Dear Toni: I am writing to request areconsideration. On Monday night , December 9, 1991 , my request for rezone was denied by the city coucil . I was not notified and would have attended had I known of your meeting. I am requesting a reconsideration for the following reasons: 1. There was significant "due process" of my rezone application the rezone staff , the enviromenal committee- and the hearing . examiner reviewed my applcation. The 'three groups approved my application for rezone subject- to some considerations; I cannot further develop the site without a future review; I cannot expand the existing building or build additional buildings without' a review. 2. Other "interested" parties were notified;' the` city followed`` all notification processes. The owner of the single family home next door was asked by me to join the rezone; they refused but never rejected my rezone; 3. The property is "nonconforming" and, the use of the building' would continue to be the- same after the rezone; origionAlly built as a house, the structure was converted into an office over� a decade ago. and has continued to be used as an office since that time. 4. The rezone matches the current comprehensive plan; under current laws, this is an acceptable rezone. Under theproposed changes to the comprehensive plan, the th& comp plan for -my property would continue to be commercial . . ' Please schedule this matter on your callender for another- hearing , so we can discuss these issues and approve the proposdd rezone. Thank youfor your help and consideration. Sincerely, C lund ~' CC:- Marlyn Peterson Nancy Mathews L CITY OF RENTON "LL Finance Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Dan Clements,Director December 11, 1991 Mr. Carl Haglund 3308 S. Judkins Street Seattle, WA 98144 Re: Haglund Rezone, R-097-90 Dear Mr. Haglund: The'ordinance adopting the referenced rezone was read at the Renton City Council meeting of December 9, 1991. The Council expressed concern regarding emergency response time to the area, and, consequently, the motion to adopt the ordinance failed and the rezone request was denied. Please feel free to contact this office or Lenora Blauman, Development Services Division, for additional information or assistance. Sincerely, Marilyn J. en, CMC City Clerk 235-2502 cc: Mayor Earl Clymer Council President Toni Nelson Don Erickson, Principal Planner Lenora Blauman, 'Senior Planner Fred Kaufman, Hearing Examiner • • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2558 +Y"Dec:tuber 9. 1991 Renton City Council Minutes Pane 404 Rezone: Haglund, 4016 An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of property located Jones Ave., R-097-90 at 4016 Jones Avenue, from R-1 (Single-Family Residential) to B-1 (Business �—' District) (Haglund rezone, File No. R-097-90). Moved by Mathews, seconded by Nelson, Council adopt the ordinance as presented.* Councilman Stredicke stated that building should not be allowed in this area since fire services are not available for additional building at this time. Councilwoman Keolker-Wheeler expressed concern that the rezone to B-1 would landlock an adjacent R-1 property. *Roll Call: Ayes: Nelson, Schlitzer, Mathews. Nays: Zimmerman, Keolker- Wheeler, Stredicke, Edwards. Motion failed. Ordinance #4334 An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of existing 40,000 Rezone: M-V Properties, square foot medical office building at Valley Gardens Health Center, 601 Valley Gardens Health South Carr Road, from P-1 (Public Use) to O-P (Office Park) (Valley Gard-n Center, R-053-91 Health Center/M-V Properties rezone; File No. R-053-91). MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY EDWARDS, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS PRESENTED.* Councilwoman Keolker-Wheeler noted that restrictive covenants restrict the building to medically-related business uses. *ROLL CALL:. ALL AYES. MOTION CARRIED. - Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke presented the following ordinances for first reading: Annexation: Honey Creek An ordinance was read annexing approximately 44 acres, located at 124th Ridge Avenue SE and 125th Avenue SE in the general vicinity of SE 100th and SE 104th Streets (Honey Creek Ridge Annexation; A-001-90). MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE BACK TO WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. Utility: 1992 Rates An ordinance was read amending Sections 8-1-0.A, B & C, 8-4-31.A & B-4, and 8-5-15.A & D of Title VIII (Health and Sanitation) of the City Code, relating to water and sewer charges, and amending the income level to qualify for certain senior citizen and/or disability rates for water, sewer, garbage, and storm drainage. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE BACK TO WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. Budget: 1992 An ordinance was.read: 1) Adopting the annual budget for the year 1992 in the total balanced amount of $101,624,688; 2) Adopting the additional 1/4 percent real estate excise tax; 3) Amending Section 5-5-3(C)7 of Chapter 5, Business Licenses; 4) Amending Section 7-1-4(D)2, adding Section 7-1-4(D)3; amending section 7-4-4(H)6, and adding Section 7-1-4(H)8, Fire Uniform Code Permit Fees and Construction Fees; 5) Establishing and adjusting park and golf course fees, and police private security fees; 6) Establishing a new fund for the Community Development Block Grant program; 7) Adjusting salaries for bargaining and non-bargaining unit employees; and 8) Dissolving the 1983 limited general obligation refunding bond fund. In response to Councilman Stredicke's inquiry, Deputy Finance Director Iwen Wang stated that the City's property tax amounted to $11,498,588. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE BACK TO WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. 1 NEW BUSINESS Council President Nelson opened nominations for Council President. Council: Election of Nominated were Kathy Keolker-Wheeler and Richard Stredicke. MOVED'I Officers BY NELSON, SECONDED BY EDWARDS, COUNCIL APPOINT KATH KEOLKER-WHEELER AS COUNCIL PRESIDENT FOR THE YEAR 19 2. CARRIED. Council President Nelson opened nominations for Council President Pro Tempore. Nominated were Robert Edwards and Richard Stredicke. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY SCHLITZER, COUNCIL APPOINT ROBERT EDWARDS AS COUNCIL PRESIDENT PRO - TEMPORE FOR THE YEAR 1992. CARRIED. . . APPROVED -9 9'/ 'moo WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE . COMMITTEE REPORT DECEMBER 9, 1991 ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS • I The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following ordinances for second and final reading: Carl Haglund Rezone from R-1 to B-1 located at 4016 Jones Avenue „ dzi1tze- L M-V Properties Rezone, Valley Gardens Health Center, 601 South"Carr Road from P-1 to O-P The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following ordinances for first reading: 1992 Rates Ordinance 1992 Budget Ordinance Honey Creek Ridge Annexation • Richard Stredicke, Chair Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Vice-Chair /i2?(-1 () Nancy Math s, Member Copies: Don Erickson Lenora Blauman Kay Shoudy Iwen Wang Joan Pringle I, x December 2, 1991 - Renton City Council Minutes - - Page 3,195 Streets: Parking Transportation Division recommended implementation of proposed parking Restrictions, Pelly North restrictions and permit system to the 400 block of Pelly Avenue N and the & Burnett North east side of the 300 block of Burnett Avenue N. Refer to Transportation Committee. CAG: 90-070, Bronson & Utility Systems Division/Stormwater Utility submitted CAG-070-90, Bronson Houser Storm System and Houser.Storm System Rehabilitation Project; and requested approval of! Rehabilitation the project, authorization for final pay estimate in the amount of $286,437.86, commencement of 30-day lien period, and release of retained amount of $13,236.49 to contractor, Gelco Insituform, Inc., if all required releases have been received. Council concur. MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS AMENDED. CARRIED. OLD BUSINESS Council President Nelson presented a Committee of the Whole report stating Committee of the Whole that the Committee recommended approval of Policy and Procedure 800-101, Policy: Filling Council "Filling Council Vacancies" which is consistent with State law (RCW 42.30; Vacancies RCW 35A.12). MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY KEOLKER- WHEELER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. King County: General Councilman Stredicke provided information from the City Clerk which stated Election Results 1991 that 67 percent of eligible Renton voters participated in the November, 19911, election; and 14 percent of the voters participated through absentee ballots. He supported continuation of efforts to encourage voter registration and election turnout. Legal: Control of Junk Councilman Stredicke expressed concern that the City Code does not prohibit Cars, Recreational the parking of junk cars, large recreational vehicles, boats, etc. in the yards, Vehicles, Boats, Etc. in of single-family residential areas, nor does it require screening of storage Residential Yards areas. He cited ordinances adopted by other cities to protect the quality of life in neighborhoods and make such practice a violation, noting that lack of regulation is resulting in an abundance of eyesores throughout Renton. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY ZIMMERMAN, COUNCIL REFER THIS MATTER TO THE LEGAL DEPARTMENT FOR THE PREPARATION OF AN ISSUE PAPER. CARRIED. MOVED BY EDWARDS, SECONDED BY ZIMMERMAN, COUNCIL REFER THIS MATTER TO THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE. CARRIED. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways & Means Referred 11/25/91 - Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke Committee presented a report stating that the Committee recommended concurrence in Finance: Cellular Phone the request to extend the City's cellular phone discount to the City Attorney's Discount Extension (City office. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, Attorney) COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke presented the following ordinances for first reading: Rezone: Haglund, 4016 An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of property located Jones Ave., R-097-90 at 4016 Jones Avenue, from R-1 (Single-Family Residential) to B-1 (Business District) (Haglund rezone, File No. R-097-90). MOVED BY STREDICKE,'� SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE BACK TO WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. Rezone: M-V Properties, An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of existing 40,000 Valley Gardens Health square foot medical office building at Valley Gardens Health Center, 601 Center, R-053-91 South Carr Road, from P-1 (Public Use) to O-P (Office Park) (Valley Garden Health Center/M-V Properties rezone; File No. R-053-91). MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL REFER, THE ORDINANCE BACK TO WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke presented a Committee report recommending the following resolution for reading and adoption: • ; 7_ dr , -)PROVECI WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT ,I DECEMBER 2, 1991 •I CELLULAR PHONE DISCOUNT EXTENSION (Referred 11/25/91) The Ways and Means Committee recommends concurrence in the request to extend the City's cellular phone discount to the City Attorney's office. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following ordinances for first I reading: Carl Haglund Rezone from R-1 to B-1 located at 4016 Jones Avenue it M-V Properties Rezone, Valley Gardens Health Center, 601 South Carr Road • ,I • from P-1 to O-P The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following resolution for reading and adoption: Authorizing Mayor to Ehter into Interlocal Cooperative Agreement with King County to Establish a Growth Management Planning Council of King County II ! 10/74-40 /if Sk96,..,i/A-9 Richard Stredicke, Chair • 4_,6-the4 W - / 1'1 ICI I. Kathy lker-Wheeler, Vice-Chair rii)4(.(ttE/24. 2 Nancy Mat ews, Member Copies: Larry Warren Don Erickson Kay Shoudy CITY OF RENTON NOV 2 6 1991 CITY OF RENTON Iie.t;EIVED iY CLERK'S OFFICE MEMORANDUM • DATE: November 25, 1991 TO: Marilyn Petersen, City Clerk FROM: Lenora Blauman, Senior Planner SUBJECT: Ordinance Of The City Of Renton,Washington changing the zoning classification of certain properties within the City of Renton from R-1 (Single-Family Residential)to B-1 (Business District) (Haglund Rezone; File No.R-097-90). I have reviewed and approved the attached draft ordinance ordinance. Feel free to contact me if you have any questions. • • • it • . EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SOUTH 1/2 OF LOT 9 IN BLOCK 2 AND THE EAST 1/2 OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF LOT 9 IN BLOCK 2 OF C.D. HILLMAN'S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN, DIVISION NO. 7 AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 16 OF PLATS, PAGE 18 RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON TOGETHER WITH ALL THAT PORTION OF LINCOLN PLACE NE AS VACATED BY CITY OF RENTON ORDINANCE 2961 THAT WOULD ATTACH BY Y OPERATION OF ii LAW TO SAID LOT 9 OF C. D. HILLMAN'S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN DIVISION NO. 7. D:91-772:MD:ps • • i II ' l III r.;ya AFr .. / ,,,..... .„,_....:„. r CITY OF RENTON 'jn'`..i': J i f(f' /� '�Y.f /�bl /r'/''i 4 *Lk, � � /' 6' f.:/ ,;�� .fc r. �.vpy�Y1. i<S s I.: _ _' r, ;:�:-.;:r, ' ,::. . .;* ;, rf ZONING MAP .. . ; �.•,' '" //. s , L - J' fogp Lii . .... .... :,:: � , _ \ R-1 ZONING MAP LEGEND k i . . PROPOSE. ZONE-ARE F I YMB - - - TRIC=T USE - -- , .N . D - A fir .. `— -- — _— 5 GL--- — D1S U-SE / fl N f�i z. %�i���;�i/ 4 1,11 = _ cv G-1 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE—FAMILY ,%,, 0 ST . ..]%' ' \ ~ `'eLe� T ` ► R-1 RESIDENTIAL- — SINGLE—FAMILY 7 �� , , ��' , I Q j � IM�� z I ((� �-7 - 0. :II R-2 RESIDENTIAL — TWO—FAMILY ��11 f 11� R-1 CD Ma ` RESIDENTIAL MULTIPLE—FAMILY A! ! ?LMI SST IAA w -0 � Ff '7zY, ,E= RW , � i © Pfili eitIP ' �. li ;it' , RESIDENTIAL — MULTIPLE—FAMILY �� R ■ ,x F4.,; Q ■■ 11EL�a� Ui F 4"1! '!' i \164th ST � � PUBLIC USE 1 o ...f--"a v.., _ BUSINESS USE I I i tti 55ii-11 j hi- _,,‘ wa. :;!..,.,:„..,_,...:1:.,. — . >,. !' . - r „ :, r ## 11 O OFFICE PARK ] I I N 3 tf STI .� Loa �=E ; l0 R_1 � , MIN F— 11 �I V1 4 ---I (` .�-, L ::::: LIGHT INDUSTRIAL �, g 1 NE Ord S tF-t FEE '.j �� itift cc m II I I i I �. c. G-1 MANUFACTURING PARK 11 11 I,� N 3,2n1r04 r�c --4 *441 ` m 11111111 ' I 1 ;;" = %% HEAVY INDUSTRIAL ■li�lll�L!JAIAIlI!11�1■ II. NE 31 st ST — 11111111/�J�L'1C�Ia1111� ..� `.'' \Ili �' - _ TRAILER PARK 111111fl1_9.._ 1111 G-1,- ,�. — ' oe �,. CITY LIMITS ■I.�Y�ii��il�lll■ 4Q5 . ,� I I T ' r'`� • ,� G-1',, IMPORTANT CHECK EACH REZONE ORDINANCE` �i _ .,,����• FOR POSSIBLE RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS I I I G- I G, 1 .01 DEPARTMENT of PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC woks ( I I I l I �I K8�! [ I �I ti ��� R-1 R-1 �T , \ PAOEI N 28t �i�,, NE 2 ® ST `� �1 G-1 dR ♦ DEvaoPM�r sERY10E8 DmsK�, SCALES 1• • 6OO o4 �: NAP L CRAVING BY P/H/PV TEX]facAL SERVICES SfTTIIH 02/23/91 15: 26: 30 October 7. 1991 Renton City Council Minutes e. Page 335 stating gross vehicle weight (GVW) be changed to read gross registered vehicle weight (GRVW). MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY ZIMMERMAN, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. CARRIED. Councilmembers made the following inquiries: 1) Has the transportation of hazardous waste materials been addressed? 2) Are there any restrictions for trucks carrying chemicals in the aquifer protection area? Mr. Wilson recommended that restrictions for vehicles transporting hazardous materials be addressed as a separate issue from the truck route ordinance. MOVED BY ZIMMERMAN, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION AND REFER THIS MATTER TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED. AUDIENCE COMMENT Ralph Evans, 3306 NE 11th Place, Renton, 98056, stated that he had attended Citizen Comment: Evans a public meeting of the ,King County citizen advisory committee considering - Regional Justice Center proposed sites for the regional justice center. He said that the proposed Renton site for the center located on Monroe Avenue NE off NE 4th Street was discussed. He reported that members of the audience opposed the site and expressed concern about the sewer moratorium, lack of adequate access, Comprehensive Plan, impact of additional traffic, and nearness to single- family residential properties; and stated his opinion that these comments were not adequately considered by the committee. Mr. Evans commented that the facility will be extensive, and suggested that the City initiate further action if it does not want the justice center on the, Monroe site. Councilwoman Zimmerman reported that she attended the meeting and had submitted the 8/19/91 Public Safety Committee report regarding the Counicil's opposition to the Monroe site to the advisory committee. Citizen Comment: Webb - Sanford Webb, 430 Mill Avenue South, Renton, 98055, objected to the SEPA Process, Election newspaper coverage of election activities. He also stated his opinion that the Mayor and Council had not adhered to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) process on the Boeing EIS. Citizen Comment: Tajon Connie Tajon, 2033 Harrington Place NE, Renton, 98056, extended an - Fund Raising Event, invitation to the Council and public for a fund raising event benefiting the Victims of Mount victims of the Mount Pinatubo eruption in the Philippine Islands. The event, Pinatubo Eruption, entitled "Family Night in the Philippines," will be held at the Renton Firsts 10/12/91 - United Methodist Church on Saturday, 10/12/91 at 6:00 p.m. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the, listing. Court Case: Boulevard Court case in an undetermined amount filed by Boulevard Excavating, Inc;, Excavating, Inc., CRT- alleged non-payment of work performed as a subcontractor on construction 91-009 project located at 601 Monster Road SW (Eland Distribution Center Project). Refer to City Attorney and insurance service. �I CAG: 91-095, Senior City Clerk reported bid opening 10/2/91 for Renton Senior Housing Project; Housing Project 4 bids; Engineer's estimate: $5,897,366.00 (base bid). Refer to Community Services Committee. Rezone: Haglund, 4016 Hearing Examiner requested approval with restrictive covenants of Carl Jones Avenue, R-0790 Haglund rezone from R-1, single family residential, to B-1, business, zone w�9 9`0" for property located at 4016 Jones Avenue, File No. R-097-90. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Public Works: Noise Level Development Services Division requested approval of variance provisions to Regulations, Variance be included in Title 8, Chapter 7, Noise Level Regulations, of City Code Ito Applications authorize the Board of Public Works to consider variance applications. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. to t� Tr. CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI #: r • •SUBMITTING DATA: FOR AGENDA OF: 10/7/91 Dept/Div/Board. .Hearing Examiner Staff Contact. .Fred J. Kaufman AGENDA STATUS: Consent SUBJECT: Carl Haglund Rezone. Rezone Public Hearing. . from R-1 to B-1. Property is Correspondence. . located at 4016 Jones Avenue Ordinance. .X. . . . . Resolution Old Business. . . . EXHIBITS: Examiner's Report - 2/11/91 New Business. . . . Applicant ltr - 5/18/91 Study Session. . . Examiner ltr - 7/18/91 Information. . . . Dotson memo - 9/18/91 RECOMMENDED ACTION:Refer to Ways and Means 1 APPROVALS: Committee 1 Legal Dept 1 Finance Dept. . . . 1 Other FISCAL IMPACT: Expenditure Required.N/A. . Transfer/Amendment. . Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated. . . SUMMARY OF ACTION:Approval request for rezone from R-1 to B-1. H.E. re- commends approval by City Council subject to filing of restrictive covenants and conditions set out in his report of I February 11, 1991. There was a permit problem with this property and it was not until this was resolved with the Building Department that the applicant submitted covenants. The legal description was found to be incorrect. This has now been completed and the Restrictive Covenants are ready to be filed with King County. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval by the City Council, with conditions set out in the Hearing Examiner report of February 11, 1991. { rr MEMORANDUM T o ,nyr/.r Date /.g-7% From /40/cf Z)Q 74,f)/) / / e i4 ,d �� Subject Gam/ l � %�r� �� /?- �i'7- 7a rive lcs� csc��/Iv_� � s ��cc1 4 A _ d �/1 /� d 4 r G� ��O/!G • � Cs"Cri on C �c 1�' 4..S E;r lir./�// 0/0C,S- 4 of GIC r� � // o/ -7 0_5 /c7r-cel/j ,/ j 1 / _�j 7- �. GSlCC/ G�SSc5S�� �T /7 G7/20�GTL GGCSG,"p./ 4-9 �/ //2oSc iLL / � // i / / / I // S �j�✓G.,,. / 7 /'e of d rc / -- �jr`�,,L'J f7 UGC G� ✓ �fJonf /�Gt-C c / X 6/!�2 y47'4 °' X -u 4 -2 RECEIVED SEP-19-1991 - - ClTY OF tiENTON HEARING EXAMINER � CITY _ RENTON i Hearing Examiner Earl Clymer, Mayor Fred J. Kaufman July 18 , 1991 Carl Haglund 3308 So. Judkins Street Seattle, WA 98144 Re: Rezone 097-90 Property located at 4016 Jones Avenue Dear Mr. Haglund: On May 18 , 1991 you sent this office the Restrictive Covenant on the above property, but failed to include a typed, verified legal description of the subject property. Your letter to us said you were working with Ron Nelson from the Building Department and the matter would be concluded in a month or so . Again we must remind you that this matter has been lingering in our files since February of this year. Before any work can be accomplished on the site the rezone must receive final approval from the City Council. We can not forward this matter until the legal description for the property is forwarded to this office, verified by our Public Works Department, and then placed on the schedule to be heard by the City Council. With the length of time this matter has been held in abeyance for further action from you, it is now imperative that we move ahead with the process . We will expect to receive the legal description from you by no later than 5 : 00 P.M. , Friday, August 16 , 1991 so me may move this matter forward to the City Council for their consideration. • Sincerely, Xvf...(2z-Z c9{rs�L�ircJ� FRED J. KAUFMAN G1 / HEARING EXAMINER FJK/dk cc: Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator Lenora Blauman, Senior Planner Ron Nelson, Building Department . . - &KK� �21991 �`n' - arm��� "~ m ~�^ ! HEA��m�^'-' May is, 1991 3308 S. Judkins St Seattle, Wa 98144 (206) 309-7601 Dotty Klingman Office of the Hearing Examiner City of Renton � 200 Mill Avenue South | � Renton , WA 98055 RE: Haglund Rezone at: � 4016 Jones Ave. NW Renton , WA � Dear Dotty: As per your requests, enclosed is the restrictive covenant which has been notorized and signed. Regarding the "filling and grading permit" required for the rezone finalization , Ron Nelson and I are working together to force my previous .tenant , Cascade West Underground Construction to resolve the dumping permit problem. Cascade West has been ordered to appear in Renton Municipal Court this Thursday. | 'Hopefuly this court action will motivate the contractor to � complete the necessary doccumentation to satisfy the City. Resolution of the filling and grading permit problem could casily take an additional 2 months to resolve. I will keep you updated . / | If you have any questions or need any additional information, pleases do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you for your help. �znce | . . � ~- [ /- ' | U ` / J | , , 1 February 11, 1991 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION APPLICANT: CARL HAGLUND File No: R-097-90 LOCATION: 4016 Jones Avenue I SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Approval of a non-project, programmatic rezone of an • approximately 57,584 sq. ft. parcel from R-1 to B-1. 1 SUMMARY OF ACTION: Planning Division Recommendation: Approval, with j conditions. I PLANNING DIVISION REPORT: The Planning Division Report was received by the Examiner on January 31, 1991 PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Division Report, examining) available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: 1 MINUTES The hearing was opened on February 7, 1991 at 2:30 P.M. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit #1 - Yellow File containingapplication, proof of posting and publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. 1 Exhibit #2 - Vicinity Map Exhibit #3 - Site Plan i The hearing opened with a presentation of the staff report by LENORA BLAUMAN, Senior Planner.I Her review follows. The rezone of this property is intended to not only match the Comprehensive Plan designation g but will be consistent with properties to the north and west which are commercial uses. The south property is zoned for residential use. The applicant's property is currently developed with a single family structuk'e and accessory building which were converted previous to 1978 to a business use when commercial uses were permitted in the R-1 zone; the applicant is not planning to change the property but wants the i property to comply with the Comprehensive Plan so that whatever future improvements he may make will comply with code requirements. Utilities are currently on the site, with a tributary to May Creek crossing the site; development currently conforms to commercial use regulations and if rezoned I landscaping along the northern boundary would be necessary; future improvements may be required on the site and the city is asking for site plan review for any future development on the property. Reviewing the rezone criteria Ms. Blauman said the subject site was not considered at the time of the I last area-wide land use analysis; the property is properly classified for the zone that is requested as it is surrounded with commercial zoning; the change of zoning would be consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan and public utilities in the area will support the conversion to commercial use; and it is felt by staff that this request is timely as the surrounding infrastructure and public services are supportive. The lot is large enough to adequately support a neighborhood-type commercial development. Impacts from commercial uses on the site that may appear at a later date I would be addressed at the time of site plan review. Staff recommends approval of this rezone with the applicant providing landscaping, fencing, a landscape maintenance surety device for a period of two years, restrictive covenants to ensure commercial use conformance with the Zoning Code, an agreement to participate in the provision of future utility and other public service improvements and an agreement to submit to site plan and environmental review for any exterior modifications to the existing or new development that may be on the site. The applicant, CARL HAGLUND, 3308 South Judkins Street, Seattle, 98144 confirmed his acceptance' of the information and conditions set out by Ms. Blauman, and had no further comment. Carl Haglund R-097-90 February 11, 1991 Page 2 it • Not present, but requesting a copy-of the Examiner's report was: Bob Fawcett, 305 - Second Avenue NE, Issaquah, 98027. The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak, and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 2:45 P.M. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicant, Carl Haglund, filed a request for approval of a rezone of approximately 57,584 square feet of property from R-1 (Single Family; Lot size - 7,200 sq ft) to B-1 (Business/Commercial). 2: The yellow file containing the staff report, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. 3. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the City's responsible official, issued a Declaration of Non-Significance (DNS) for the subject proposal. 4'i The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. 5.. There was no opposition from the public regarding the subject proposal. 6. The subject site is located at 4016 Jones Avenue N.E. The site is southeast of the N.E. 44th Street I-405 interchange. The site is bounded on the south and east by N.E. 40th Street. li 7. The subject site is an irregularly shaped parcel. It is shaped somewhat like a backwards 'L' with the crook to the northwest. 8.� The subject site was annexed to the city with the adoption of Ordinance 1823 which was enacted in April, 1960. The single family zoning was applied at that time. n, 9. ' The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of commercial uses, but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the Plan. 10. The site is provided with water and sewer service by the city, with lines located along Jones and N.E. 40th. Storm water drains into a channel that crosses the center of the subject site. � 4 11:. The single family home and accessory building located on the subject site have been converted to commercial uses. The conversion occurred prior to 1978 when commercial uses were still permitted in the R-1 zone. The building maintains its single family appearance. 12L While the original conversion was permitted, the current code makes the use a legal non- conforming use which may not be modified, enlarged or improved except within very specific limits. Therefore, the applicant has proposed reclassifying the site to B-1. B-1 zoning would permit normal repair and maintenance and enlargement and modification. '! 13. Single family uses are located north of the site. Commercial uses are located both south and east of the site. A mix of commercial and single family uses are located west of the site. A single family home is located in the crook of the 'L.' Staff and the applicant invited the owner of that property to join in this rezone but the owner declined to participate. 14. The zoning in the area reflects a mix of uses. The subject site is zoned R-1, while the site;to the east is zoned B-1. The zoning north of the site is R-1. B-1 zoning is located adjacent'{to the 44th Street interchange north of the site. , 15. There has been substantial development near the 44th Street interchange in the last five years. These uses included commercial and residential uses. Property south and east of the subject site has recently been annexed to the city. 16. Because, the site wraps around a single family home on two sides and is close to other single family properties, staff has recommended that the site be subject to site plan review. - • • Carl Haglund R-097-90 February 11, 1991 Page 3 17. With the conversion of the site to commercial zoning, staff has also recommended that the applicant provide a landscaping and fencing screen along property lines that abut the single family uses north and west of the site. 18. A tenant of the subject site imported some fill materials to the site. These materials were not approved, nor was the actual filling. A court action has been filed, and the site must be ' brought into compliance with city requirements. CONCLUSIONS ' 1. The proponent of a rezone must demonstrate that the request is in the public interest, that it will not impair the public health, safety and welfare and in addition, complies with at least one of the criteria found in Section 4-8-14, which provides in part that: a. The subject site has not been considered in a previous area-wide rezone or land use analysis; or b. The subject site is potentially designated for the new classification per the Comprehensive Plan; or c. There has been a material and substantial change in the area in which the subject site is located since the last rezoning of the property or area. The requested classification is justified and should be approved. 2. There has been no analysis of the zoning of the subject site since it was annexed in 1960. It further appears that there was no special review of the conversion of the site from single family uses to commercial uses when the site was converted. 3. The area in which the site is located is designated for commercial uses by the Comprehensive Plan. A commercial node has been designated near the 44th street interchange of I-405. Staff has reported that there is sufficient capacity in the underlying infrastructure, including the roads and utilities, to support commercial uses on the site. 4. ' In addition to the Comprehensive Plan's designation of the site for commercial uses, the area has shifted from'scattered single family uses to commercial uses, particularly north and east of the site. The reclassification of the subject site to B-1 would be a logical extension of the commercial zoning, although care must be exercised since some surrounding uses are still single family in character. The proposed reclassification will extend B-1 zoning further south and away from the 44th Street node. The result will probably hasten the conversion of the intervening single family uses. The fact that the site is already utilized for commercial uses makes the request more appropriate, and the fact that the Comprehensive Plan suggests that this would be the logical southern extent of the commercial node also supports this conversion. 5. Staff's recommendation that the site be subject to site plan review seems appropriate. Site plan review can be used to assure that any redevelopment of the commercial uses on the subject site is compatible with surrounding uses. 6. Similarly, the conversion of the site to B-1 should be accompanied by the installation of landscaping and screening between the incompatible zoning districts. While the use has been" there for a number of years, the city did not thoroughly review the original conversion. Incompatible uses, according to the Comprehensive Plan, should'be separated by a combination of landscaping and fencing to soften the impacts on the less intense uses by the more intense commercial uses. ' 7. Any filling and grading that has occurred on the site shall remain subject to city review and approval. ' 8. In conclusion, the proposed reclassification, subject to the conditions enumerated above, is appropriate and should be approved by the City Council. Carl Haglund R-097-90 February 11, 1991 Page 4 RECOMMENDATION The City Council should approve the reclassification of the subject site from R-1 to B-1 subject to the following'conditions: 1. The applicant shall install landscaping along all property lines not abutting a public, street. The landscaping shall be supplemented by a wooden fence. The landscaping and fence shall be subject to the approval of the Planning Division. 2. The applicant shall post a bond in an amount to be determined by the Planning Division to insure that the landscaping survives its initial installation. 3. The applicant shall execute restrictive covenants requiring site plan review for any ; redevelopment of the subject site. 4. The applicant shall comply with all city requirements in regard to the filling and grading that has occurred on the site. No further filling or grading shall occur on this site without the issuance of a fill and grade permit ORDERED THIS 11 th day of February, 1991. FRED J. FMAN HEARING EXAMINER TRANSMITTED THIS 11 th day of February, 1991 to the parties of record: Carl Haglund 3308 S. Judkins Street Seattle, WA 98144 Bob Fawcett 305 Second Avenue NE Issaquah, WA 98027 • TRANSMITTED THIS 11 th day of February, 1991 to the following: Mayor Earl Clymer Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator Lynn A. Guttmann, Administrator Members, Renton Planning Commission Jim Hanson, Development Services Manager Gary Gotti, Fire Marshal Ronald Nelson, Building Director Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Jay Covington, Mayor's Executive Assistant Transportation Systems Division Valley Daily News Utilities System Division Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 15 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 P.M. February 25, 1991. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment,_ or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing mayi . make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 16, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of $75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. The Ap pearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision May not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in,,the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication y, permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and wouldallow them to I, openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. ' .....___,.. . • ., i . . • . , I.,....•,:,:-.••• „r : f..'s,;• 1 ' • 1$ 1 I I I ,6° .: 1 1 i 1 . . . ; / * -1 : NI V''‘, . l'uli . .' . ,., . 1 _ j_ e. 1 —... . . • . • I I 11 4 4 . 0 114 0 ...1' 1109 \. • 1 / - . ' - FA 1 t, I 14ir'l'S' / iir l. I . .!I,,. t.... . 1 1 I A (11,1', . fr V ,Y/ as ' .. . :.• ', (. . ,..\ , ,... I.' >4 14'..I....L..; ,;. . .,. .. , , .., y '. I Bi - ...,!p,.;,•' ;',,,I1' r.',... • , ..?4,irslIk'40,.'C':'t*". . ''• 411. • // .B—1 / '.,:'i.... ,i4i:i'14:4!,, .•' -, -'1- .:.[1./ ' .7 5 . 7G— II ma., ples t.,,,,,,,N,f.oc r:, • • , . 4..ii:_lz;:i. zz ._.. 167 s 5 0 Z 5 i, . . ' -7: P •••,:' Z1 ,•‘ '••••••• li . • . ,// IP • _ N . ."' . . 4lit) o59 , -- ‘,„,, ., ,--) • it . . . / \1(' . . ...• / / ‘. . . .... ,.F....` if. • -------• ... .-- --.. ... 1 ...4.9 ir V7:-. ST 1 N... • . R-1 . A • 3 4 • : : . i I.. I i ; i • c ;;:N1,.•t vy, • : :-----'-----:"..1"."-...• .)::.s...ti C, 1 5 , •• ' • 7 ". . j'., /4 . R-3 --->, _....... i /4. . ;.'s-i--;;;;$, •2 .. \ • i IA. . —1 • 'V . • , . \ 11*,/,. ' . • • 7 / ' i .. tat. - W. . 1 • 111 . ... .. . - //,/ .Y. // /Y ___ .. 8 7 : \f 4 • ,0 5 1 . _ ,‘,3 _._ _... • ..... : .10 --- IP I \ •' . I --7:- ------- _2.—- • . .5 b .. ----• [- .'',.:.• ,,,••,1-:" 7 , . , , . . i 0 5 [•// 4 'I „1 SI I ; •'Z . , —2..r:z;:t. IIII . . . . . . , .. . . -----------. . . . . . • ' I', '.. f.2.:rst T"-;',1:; .ii,,Yi.: '..—.0 • . • . , .. . . Carl Haglund ;•:.,, A;..•:-;,;,..z,.•-,, , ,. ,,, ,...,. • • . , . • ECF;R09 .,-.90; l.• :. •—• —• • • - • • ' ' - . . ,..I i:..-:i q.!;:;3,,:•.,!.:.:,..'Q:•••i" • :'......::.! .,,,, ',:•:. . . ' • . " ' .;!•,•:,:'• !,::\;In.,:'‘. : ;,..ii:. , :.. : : .' . ' • . • . . . , • . . : ,V,% •.:.. .':!•';',WI!...0..! i';', ::.: ,.. •:" • ' • • . • ..1•:.1 ''''!..',,..s C: 1:3;.;ii•:.:,-., .,.. :, • APPLICANT : Carl Ha 1 und ' • .; . ,..v.; ..,:i. i..',170T.AL AREA . 57,584-SqUare feet . PRINCIPAL ACCESS Jones Avenue NE • ,: it •:; ,:',•,,.fc.,,..1:,,... ,., •• . : )<*i STING ZONING Si ngl e-Family Residenial.:.Use (R7.1 ) : . , 1 . . EXISTING USE small business office 1:,.. ; ...:.;:i.ir,.1z:,!.:•• i.;. , :. ' • . . . . . . . PROPOSED USE . small business office • • I 1 - , • ...,.:.:•,, ,;..yi.:,:,. .,;:.1 ..,, ,... . I COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN - Commercial Use . • •- yi..,,,ILL,4.q.sils ..• . . • COMMENTS Located at 4016 Jones• Avenue'":.:2Y::' 4J'r9.f.il.':., ':.:.---, : ' 1 . : .;,-..;.i -....:,,:,:,i•-.,..,,:r,piw,;:?. ..)r,,,I..t.,.‘,,., :" ;. .. ,. . •. • : . • . : , ,. • • . . . . • - . 1 - . . , . 1 1 . . .• . . • . , : .... .•• . ;,,., ,:,,,ir .!. . . • . . , , • , . • • . . . . . ' . . , .. .- . . . • . . . . . .•• • . . . . • . . • . . , te,ek, .. . . . . . • _ . .._ -- .„-- z /..ri,kfiriefc.- • . . • / / . ,, \ • . ._. \ •:!, - • \ I . . . .I• .•:-:-. -: ' .. . - A• .7 . . 1 • • , . . / - ‘x V1/411/ - • • • . . . Z . • / I . " . • I ' / .# i I . * - . I -: tatA,..\ •''I Z I . . . I , • • • . . . -• • . . \ -.. . _ -— l, v •I. . - • • . • • - • \ ...,/ - • - • • . • - . • • ,/ ,- 1 • / •, i. . .,-.s.,5;s;z i • . 1.:-.., :i'..,:.- -.:.,-,-,::s,:!::;:.-.-,-.:.:,, t:,,:.•:-,....-.-....-: .::::•...-:::....,.:-..,..,:•,...,-, ...-, . ..-..:....•. .:,.... . . . •• -.,,..::•-• , • - . •7 I i • %. I . . \ . . • ' . 1.- . • . --. . II . . . I. . / . - I * 4 Valt/ 1 ' I I •. . . • . . . . 1 ' I , . .. Vel-11,14/ 2 aV'On eAy_ I '.# 1 . . . T •• • , _ , 1 y Le. 11/ / 11 '4111111 ., f'illii-t1 / ,i, . .. . • _y_entracry/r, 1 1 1241‘-e- , . . feP.Vh VP- 1/1,;(::,,,,6„. . I :i-' Irveit.v7 7 ,/ , i 1 ,••• I• . / • .,, > - •,- 1 -, •-11,74.0),„>-(21 - I L-> I I / . . I ,. ' Fewte-r1 / . .. ... t . It 1 / I -' -i• 1 - ,, ___ _ _, . . ,, • / \ 1 . • Cl 0 191/ --1-1 ip,6. 74. f;14 . 4 __5SZ'' ,kur. .. 0 c_ ,,, .. . -,V. - ....v rob . - .. . . • . . _.. .. . • 1 Jot-1-5P2 P,N.lef— rne-, - . . . . . . . . . . ..., . . . . . . . . . . . . - - _--__—__—_---_--_- _- _ _ _ -= -- 1 1 I 1 le---WCOrtir? ACrl, e'7.Z> q._)..-/COPV17 P,06.61,2 7 I H .9 I11L12%: • ' 1— rrTsf I - - -- - - I k ,,t i j p-i I 1 -\ il D-I1 -l - .. lY , w : i 1 Z :uhrFr h .r b_____I -- t�I�t • i ryw. I Ci 11 I t ) - - . . 1 kagi-77) 1 i v'Z/r- 1 Qyzr/A P--t r �I ¢ � � � l2S • par, m sr,,(P.4.4., • 1 1 1 1 • urci if-2 L/ of 106 I'h 'f> 4 - • II \' A- 61- 11407Pll \U . + --4ii c 7G' \ , urn CT- C,3,1`1G10 F 1 c. CITY of RENTON Wi • Hearing Examiner Earl Clymer, _Mayor Fred J.Kaufman I i September 25, 1991 1 i Carl Haglund I ' 3308 So. Judkins Street Seattle, -WA 98144 1 ( . I RE: Haglund Rezone Request File No. R-097-90 . ' Dear Mr. Haglund: I . The Examiner' s Report and Recommendation regarding the referenced request has not. been appealed within the time period established by ordinance. Also, the Restrictive Covenants for this rezone have . finally been completed and will be transmitted from the City. Clerk' s Office to the County Recorder for recording. This .matter is being submitted to the City. Clerk this date for transmittal to the City Council for, review on or about October 7, 1991. Before that date you should contact that office to verify the date and time. You will receive notification of final approval, as well as a, copy i the enacting ordinance, from the City Clerk upon adoption by the City Council. . • You will: be notified of all action taken by the City Council upon approval of the request. . Please feel free to contact the City Clerk' s Office if further assistance or information is required. i Sincerely, . . I -Stzipe c,-2. 4.4./i,r...0..,0X, . • 1 FRED J. KAUFMAN HEARING EXAMINER 1 . FJK:dk . I cc: % City Clerk Building Division. Planning Division Inn -ram AvPrnnP Smith - Rentnn_ Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2593 I ECEIVED September 23, 1991 3308 S . Judkins St Sip 24 1991 Seattle , WA 98144 CITY %.0 ,HEARIN Dotty Klingman Office of the Hearing Examiner City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton , WA 98055 RE : Haglund Rezone AT : 4016 Jones ave NW Renton , WA Dear Dotty : As per your requests , enclosed is the ammended subject legal1 description . If you have any questions or need any additional information , please do not h st ' ate to call me . Thank you for your hep . Sincere y , 1 Ha and ' _ I . I 1 1l v1EMORANDDUM "�J ,- To i-e /1� -, .�e�., c irsinvr Date 9/8 / From 44 4- Do7s/9,) ��oP� /Lierv�� 2 P, . Subject ��,-1 : / ��� te, /?- -'7- 9a 7/- S 14 CG. z - Wes-cry,A2,/ / a#a c 1 ee/ cis ,,t'Arl l 4 Goes 4 074 ` Ql/ ©, o.sJe «ie� ,/,�1,/ 4'/ ' 0,1 �j /OGCi ` ®vi G���/!o,-�f /p 4. C is X lo/ 2. /`u--/ ye ZA • 41 RECEIVED SEP 19, 1991 HEARING ,k EXAMINER• • • I I EXHIBIT `A ' fi • LEGAL DESCRIPTION ; 5= 1 /2 OF LOT c4 IN BLOCK 2 AND THE EAST 1 /2 , OF THE NORTH 1 /2 OF LOT 9 IN BLOCK 2 OF HILLMAN 'S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN DIVISION NO . 7 AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 16 OF PLATS , ;' PAGE 16 Q.e`ary o k��S Co,... (AJasl.�.,5 }b,. • 1-o9efi wiii,, a// 71141 /z 7Z L / P/4Ca /11 S O r Oit. O I/I C o K C< by C,Ly / �/ o. tia�� Z96 i 11,.w� wou// 63.-4zi 4)45A `/44. � G rG(e.. o 74 Ede-.-... No_ 7 • %St° -c 014 I. f� I N 46 �� CITY OF R.ENTON mil Hearing Examiner Earl Clymer, Mayor Fred J. Kaufman cThn )Fc--'2110, ofq SEP I F 1991 CITY OF RENTON PUBLIC WORKS r ,t 1.STOMMMER SERVICES MEMORANDUM DATE: September 16, 1991 TO: Mike Dotson, Property Management FROM: Fred Kaufman, Hearing Examiner SUBJECT: Carl Haglund Rezone - R-097-90 / � • Legal Description verification . Mike: Attached is a copy .of a portion of the assessors map and a legal description submitted for the referenced rezone request. The street I address is 4016 Jones Avenue. Would you please verify the legal description and sign your approval on the bottom of this memo. When we receive your verification we will submit to the council for final approval. Thanks for your assistance. ( 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2593 MEMORANDUM DATE: September 16, 1991 TO: Mike Dotson, Property Management FROM: Fred Kaufman, Hearing Examiner/ SUBJECT: Carl Haglund Rezone - R-097-90 Legal Description verification Mike: Attached is a copy of a portion of the assessors map and a legal description submitted for the referenced rezone request. The street address is 4016 Jones Avenue. Would you please verify the legal j description and sign your approval on the bottom of this memo. When we receive your verification we will submit to the council for final approval. Thanks for your assistance. aM1 ,« to 6 0° 6 0 30 S y •b A Lti ti 6 A° °�u is Zi/ Cl 2 '0.o 061 ^yM9 y gi I ,�o I o 0�� II ry \��l f B 09 1 Ao 1 0 O2 96 9B 2 9L 'Q D k ° (� c� 9 k ^ ° ��yo ^� 29c •7- . �►` _ ° b 9 p• °° ry N 0 N. A`'. 0 0 55D" �'N v a� n5 b o°� ; 7 ° 1q7 �o °h a3s 7s Icy' O 0 °° N 'P. N. 99-SS 0 P. r—S-E 83RD.. ST. \$0� 7• 0 2 8 u a� N r op« b li '� h \ 3 U' b N /B9.76 . .j I 3y'`1 0' o �4 / . N S°aAv B D 1 69 / 2 Z a kIi � o 00 \ 4a.es. /4.S.es. Q 0 . 4V q /'1 �: 296 97 i , 4 h :II ` pc / to /\�J^ • N o ti ba I b /, N N , n 4 o Zx _ ti h 10,9 °,16 ti°09V 7 y� Al a y 4, h 9 i'• ��U\n° N 0 249.o y) o V a l \H /O h 9 ' 0 t � ti °7 n AA ,it� 0a J ,o o fi ' • • a S N I — 252./s •P`asa�L �� - _ 00 —p Il� {r '' 1 °�9 , 9 1. \ ° /•90I� ^I' 1 — �0 Zy'o� °1 B 1 V' �29G N.69- SS L!' 297/9 ) ,m A/of. o,,c„ I 1 / 3Q 44 p�7vtnN arto 9 Z 297. 66 'ors ' "�, S E. 84TH. ST. c'`'";•� sr.) o 296 � , �/ . -'- Not oo,,, b 2 9G Z,l o b. ; -� 29 x a N O 2oi z,c 3p 192 3 ^r a I p g 5FI CIy v'� I 8 o,oQ I Zgfl • °1) /���GG Yy4 , Zei h 4 A-ezzA 5-6y —— — \y oiroz 0 N N /77GYJG3 17) 770 1/ �'o_ — o7Go 3 h h N 3 z I 4T,, 414) 0 n ¢5 A6 2 j p etzo /. 0II6 2� 2 / 9600P I 4�°°� 297 97 ° � ol�va ¢ /./4.AG . vL— 334577O-CL g5--01 f 7 2 11.49890 91 '151 :A S S TRI- 112TIINC AVE SE CIC I ?VNS LK 4N GARDEN OF EDEN # 7 I �• 1 1 RENTON WA 90C ll 1 12C:!1 1 334570-0095-09 L9 2 11.49890 [51 ••.'I. 1 DI CHARLES C 559999 LK WN GARDEN OF EDEN # 7 I . IS 8 3737 PARK AVE N 1/2 OF N 1/2 RENTON W1 98056 570-0096•08 • 2 11.49890 91 '151 s se 35 ts. S JWICCINS ST DEVEL CO 998144 I /LL OF N 1/�2 TOW VAC 5T ADJ # 7 TTLE WA 98144 1 1 570-0097-07 2 11.49890 • �•151 � ,,,- • CARE+SPAIN,CARYN 939999 ILL?W S LK WN GARDEN OF EDEN # 7 1 .5:1I 1 LSS EJUDKINS ST reA981 1/2 LOT 9 TGW VAC ST ADJ 33345�70T-00100-C2 -2�►�q�J� 3 11.49890 ' 1151 23 le i 8425 11CRC AV�E SErRTR4 061573 ES�S S SUET OFG�EZ OF EDEN # 7 IRENTCN WA 98053 GW VAC ST ADJ 3334,,pp577R0�-M1-01 3 11.49890 : '151 31.81 36334 p 228 21505C196TH AVE SE 911 ,ILL?W S LK IN GARDEN OF EDEN # 7 RENTCN WA9858 �J FT E i 334570-0110-03 3 10.93452 : 36 ARCS CON INS.} D ON NEXT PA 2 334570-0115-05 L. 1 >TE ( PARCEL NUMBER - NAME & ADDRESS LEGAL DESCRIPTION LEVY SR RL S LEVY VALUATIONS GEN'L TAX SPEC AS'MT TOTAL AMOUNT PAW NEC 111 `_ RATE EX YR T COOE L-LAND I-IMPS '_A - ROBERTS MICHAEL C &PHYLLISG+MARTH NAL0617•1 IIM FT OF SD L�OTD3 OF EDEN # ., 36 I 3a: ;1 1541 154'f C O GEORGE5L 20U6 N 1ZTH ST 6 •• LOT A OF1KCILA S8913063 I I :':i1 8699 RENTON WA • • 11- -89 334570-0115-05 1 3 10.93452 • 365E 37700 4177 41 3016 R C�LYCO INC C39999 14. YWS Of SDD npliN OF EDEN # SESEA1TTTLEIE W{ 98105 1-SLLOTT,TB11-13-89 S8 3 334570-0120-06 3 10.93452 365L.. 43 43 HELLSON J W H 9D2685 ILLMANS LK WN GARDEN OF EDEN # 8189 S SANDY HOCK DRClINTCN WA 36 M4570-0125-03 • 3 10.93452 ' 36 41 4581• 6581 �TTERSON RCBERTS CN1905 ILLMANS LK WN GARDEN OF EDEN # _ 10 172MD RENTCN WA 98058 334570-0130-06 • 3 10.93452 ' 36 NIELSEN ROLLAMD C 01 183 SILL? INSS LK $W4 GARDEN OF # • .. RENTCN W�3835 OLN AVE NE 071�56 *EC #8702110422 SD SPRT TDA�9 OT 6 OF SD SUED 334570-0132-04 • 3 10.93452 ' 36 3 1� I• NI OINEAVE NE CN4052 IUJ21AMMSS LK WW►NpGGARDENTOF EDEN9#7 Z . 1 .:a RENTON 4A 98056 'EC #870211Q422 30 SP DA#Sf86-03 OT 6 OF SD SLBO 334570-0135-01 7 3 8.175035 • 365c 1 FARR WALTER ON1435 ILLMANS LK WN GARDEN OF EDEN %7 I 1!I ^S SS •v•:: 3785 LINCCLN AVE NE AX P0R PARTIALLY EX 5 s . RENTON WA 98056 •CW 84.36.381 THR+J .389 I 7617. H 7617 i 313095 334570-0135-84 3 10.93452 ' 365.. 1m.IS 111 ' 111 FARR WALTER ON1435 ILLMYWS LK WN GARDEN OF EDEN #7 3785 LINCCLN AVE NE AX POR PARTIALLY EX UNDER RC% RENTON W1 98056 .35.381 THRU .389 NOT INCLUDED 334570-0140-04 • 3 10.93452 ' 365` O•111 44 14 44 0N19 PATTER50N ROBERT 05 ILL1 WS LK WN GARDEN Of EDEN # 7 19110 1 T2MD PL SE RENTCN W1 90058 334570-0145-09 3 11.49890 : •1CCL 3 aS 4277• ` 4277 CNAGRES P3279 ILLM ANS LK WN GARDEN Of EDEN # 7 PO BOX 2576 HIGHLANDS STATICN RENTCN WA 98055 334570-0150-01LLAq 10 3 11.49890 • •1COL 2 •5i LA BEAU4 K JAVE NE ?W HILL S LK WN GARDEN OF EDEN # 7 I offs ;“4 RENTCN W1 98056 334570-01 f 09 1 4 10.93452 • �'365E II+ 3 3<3569I $-4 WILLIAMI G 734141 HILLMANS LK WN GARDEN OF EDEN # 7 �73 MIM PL N 100 FT LESS W 96 FT HELB*A MT 59601 E ( 334570-0161-08 1-2 4 10.93452 '21 3R9 -AI PARCE CON INU 0 ON NEXT PA I II Fi **PARCEL # A 151640 6-85 B 1+11�.7sy ,• CITY if' RENTON wvtu. :„N... Hearing Examiner '`it Fred J. Kaufman Earl Clymer, Mayor • • • July 18, 1991 • • Carl Haglund 308 SO. Judkins Street Seattle, WA 98144 • Ile: Rezone 097-90 Property located at 4016 Jones Avenue Dear Mr. Haglund: On May 18 , 1991 you sent this office the Restrictive Covenant on the ! above property, but failed to include a typed, verified legal • description of the subject property. Your letter to us said you were working with Ron Nelson •from the Building Department and the matter would be concluded in a month or so. • . Again we must remind you that this matter has been lingering in our files since - February of this year. Before any work can be accomplished on the site the rezone must receive final approval from, the City Council . We can not forward this matter until the legal description for the property is forwarded to this office, verified by our Public Works Department, and then placed on the schedule to be heard by the City Council. • With the length of time this matter has 'been held in abeyance for ;, further action from you, it is now imperative that we move ahead with the process. We will expect to receive the legal description from you by no later than 5.: 00 P.M. , Friday, August 16 , 1991 so me may move this matter forward to the City Council for their consideration. • Sincerely, • FREI) J. KAUFMAN HEARING EXAMINER • PJK/dk cc: Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator Lenora Blauman, Senior Planner Rbn Nelsbn, Building Department • • I „ r,..,+h - DPnt,ln Wachinatnn 98055 - (206) 235-2593 1 •� ez iri-s. - Haglund R on'e .:_ ,?' .... ....... ...._.. R—o97-90 1, . . _.. �� F ME CITY CLERK Q�1 . a OFFICE OF .RENTON MUNICIPAL BLDG. I 200 MILL AVE. SO. • RENTON, WA 98055 . I LSD DECLARATION OF .RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS ! o . . I c) o0 y_ WHEREAS , Carl fiaglund and Carn_Spain are the owners of the ! following real property in the City of Renton, County of King, Stat:e of Washington, described as Exhibit 'A' attached hereto . I WHEREAS , the owner (s) of said described property desire to impose the following restrictive covenants running with the land as to use!, .present and future, of the above described real property . NOW, THEREFORE, the aforesaid owner (s) hereby establish, grant; and impose restrictions and covenants running with the land • hereinabove described with respect to the use by the undersigned, their successors, heirs, and assigns as follows: SITE PLAN REVIEW The applicant shall execute restrictive covenants requiring S. Ite Plan Review for any redevelopment of the subject mite. „ i • DURATION • i These covenants shall run with the land and expire on December. :n. , j 2025 . If at any time improvements are installed pursuant to these covenants, the portion of the covenants pertaining to the specific_. ; installed improvements as required. by the Ordinances of the City ofi Renton shall terminate without necessity of further documentation . Any violatiot o b each of these restrictive, covenants may be enforced by proper 1 a pr cedures in the Superior Court of King County by ! either the Ci y o ' Renton or any property owners adjoining subject , . , property h are adversely affected by said breach . 1 1 -rl, aglund car pain i • . 1 11 II . • ; • • . i 1 . I ._... ,. . t. • ' STATE OF WASHINf N . • . - ss. county of KING Carl Haglund On this -/S day of 199] , before me personally appeared the ) who xecuted the within and • foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to he the frnn and voluntary act and deed of said person (s) for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, :Lhave hereunto set my hand and . affixed my • • . official seal the day -and. year• first bove written. Notary Public in�f�a�nd�,for the State ofWashington,ng on, residing at -J C77 • J cQP , L r661 • • • n — 3t ` • ;.:a ; C7 0 '/ e9 dV . :>a Uj• U�(h5 ••)CP': • STATE OF WASHINGTON ss. ,i County of KING • . nryn Spain On this day of 1991 , before me. personally appeared the - ) .who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and 'acknowledged said instrument to he the fr.ne and voluntary act and deed of said person (s) for the uses and uri,oses therein mentioned. p ' IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I -have hereunto set. my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first 'above written. . ' ota _y Pu lic in and for the State of Washington, residing. at ��' I -\OZT q 3 . a.Z- . , �� G�S�aZ5C\66 k1,0-47E '' . �GAN L ��� 'P , SI o N C 11 yH e °o N�USL\0.),`1'f" • qJJ<�nF 17 o°a\'a 40q; • • • EXHIBIT 'A ' • LEGAL DESCRIPTION : SOUTH 1 /2 OF LOT 9 IN BLOCK 2 AND THE EAST 1 /2 OF THE NORTH 1 /2 OF LOT 9 IN BLOCK .2 OF HILLMAN 'S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN , DIVISION NO . 7 AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 16 OF PLATS , PAGE 18 RECORDS OF KING COUNTY , WASHINGTON TOGETHER WITH ALL THAT PORTION OF LINCOLN PLACE NE AS VACATED BY CITY OF RENTON ORDINANCE 2961 THAT WOULD ATTACH BY OPERATION OF LAW TO SAID LOT 9 OF HILLMAN 'S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN DIVISION NO . . 7 . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • , _ ' ' ^ K� ��� ��K .�~�� �� � C^" �����G���v"". May 18, 1991 3308 S. Judkins St Seattle, Wa 98144 (206) 329-7601 Dotty Klingman Office of the Hearing Examiner City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton , WA 98055 RF: Haglund Rezone at: 4016 Jones Ave. NW Renton , WA Dear Dotty: As per your requests, enclosed is the restrictive covenant which has been notorized and signed. Regarding the "filling and grading permit" required for the rezone finalization , Ron Nelson and I are working together to force my previous tenant , Cascade West Underground Construction to resolve the dumping permit problem. Cascade West has been ordered to appear in Renton Municipal Court this Thursday. Hopefuly this court action will motivate the contractor to complete the necessary doccumentation to satisfy the City. Resolution of the filling and grading permit problem could easily . take an additional 2 months to resolve. I will keep you updated' If you have any questions or need any additional information, pleases do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you for ypur help. Sincer / ` . 7 CITY kJ RENTON 1 .ah Hearing Examiner Earl Clymer, Mayor Fred J. Kaufman May 1, 1991 . I Carl Haglund 3308 So. Judkins Street Seattle, WA 98144 Re: Rezone at 4016 Jones Avenue 1' R-097-90 Dear Mr. Haglund: On February 11, 1991 a Recommendation was published by this office on your rezone request for the above property. I. As a condition of recommended approval to the City Council you are to furnish us with a Restrictive Covenant that states the described property will be subject to site plan review for any redevelopment of the site (condition #3) . To date we have not received this covenant, nor have we received correspondence from you as to when you expect to furnish us with same. This matter must go before the City Council for final approval prior to any work being accomplished on the site. In order for the matter ; to reach that office, we must have the conditioned restrictive covenant, which will in turn be filed with King County. After that , the matter will then be forwarded to the City Council for their review and determination. We wish to have this process move forward and would appreciate it if you would complete the above request and forward to this office. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 235-2593 . Sincerely, DOTTY LING ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER ?on Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2593 %, . - CITY I RENTON Hearing Examiner Earl Clymer, Mayor Fred J.Kaufmaii February 27, 1991 Carl Haglund - 3.3.08 So. Judkins Street Seattle, WA 98144 Re: Haglund Rezone - R-097-90 Dear Mr. Haglund: The Examiner' s Report and Recommendation issued on February 11, 1991 has not been appealed within the time period established by ordinance. As .a condition of approval, it is necessary that you, and all owners of the subject property, sign restrictive covenants requiring site plan review for any redevelopment of the property. We have attached a sample of what these covenants should be, and request that you have a like document drawn up, signed by all parties, attach a current legl description as Exhibit A, and have notarized. When this is completed please mail the document (original) to, this office. Once we have , verified the legal, this matter will then be forwarded to the City Clerk's office for transmittal to the City Council for their review. Your prompt attention to this matter. will be appreciated so we may close our files. If you have any questions please contact this office. Sincerely, ' FRED J. KAUFMAN HEARING EXAMINER FJK/dk 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2593 i • i DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS WHEREAS, Carl Haglund and Caryn Spain are the owners of the following real property in the City of Renton; County of King, State' of Washington, described as Exhibit 'A' attached .hereto. WHEREAS, the owner(s) of said described property desire to impose the following restrictive covenants running with the land as to use, present and future, of the above described real property. NOW, THEREFORE, the aforesaid owner(s) hereby establish, grant and impose restrictions and covenants running with the land hereinabove described with respect to the use by the undersigned, their successors, heirs, and assigns as follows: SITE PLAN REVIEW The applicant shall execute restrictive covenants requiring Site Plan Review for any redevelopment of the subject site. �- DURATION These covenants shall run with the land and expire on December 31, 2025. If at any time improvements are installed pursuant to these covenants, the portion of the covenants pertaining to the specific installed improvements as ,required by the Ordinances of the City of Renton shall terminate without necessity of further documentation. Any violation or breach of these restrictive covenants may be enforced by proper legal procedures in the Superior Court of King County by either the City of Renton or any property owners adjoining subject property who are adversely affected by said breach. (type name under line and sign above line (type name under line and sign above line STATE OF WASHINGTON ss. County of KING On this day of 1991, before me personally appeared the person(s) who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said person(s) for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. ' IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year. first above written. I! • Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing' • at 1 • • • I • 1 i, • • • • -. AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE' BY MAILING' • STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )ss. County :of King ) • • DOTTY KLINGMAN being first duly sworn , upon oath, deposes and states: • • • ii That on the . 11th day of February 1.991 affiant • deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties .of record in the below entitled application or petition. • L . • • • Ofet,-*)'7rrz-e2-4 SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this fl day : of -re/YYCkk-y , 19 91„ / • i\9.1,01)-V\_ No ary lic in and for the State of Washington, residin K.6:15 Ca-u,l,t , therein. • Application, Petition, or Case #: R-097-90 - CARL HAGLUND (The minutes contain a list of the parties of.record.) I• i - • February 11, 1991 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION APPLICANT: CARL HAGLUND File No: R-097-90 LOCATION: 4016 Jones Avenue SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Approval of a non-project, programmatic rezone of an approximately 57,584 sq. ft. parcel from R-1 to B-1. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Planning Division Recommendation: Approval, with conditions. PLANNING DIVISION REPORT: The Planning Division Report was received by the Examiner on January 31, 1991 PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Division Report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES The hearing was opened on February 7, 1991 at 2:30 P.M. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit #1 - Yellow File containing application, proof of postin• and publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit #2 - Vicinity Map Exhibit #3 - Site Plan The hearing opened with a presentation of the staff report by LENORA BLAUMAN. Senior Planner. Her review follows. The rezone of this property is intended to not only match the Comprehensive Plan designation but wil be consistent with properties to the north and west which are commercial uses. The south property is zoned for residential use. The applicant's property is currently developed with a single family structure and accessory building which were converted previous to 1978 to a business use when commercial uses were permitted in the R-1 zone; the applicant is not planning to change the property but wants the property to comply with the Comprehensive Plan so that whatever future improvements he may make will comply with code requirements. Utilities are currently on the site, with a tributary to May Cree crossing the site; development currently conforms to commercial use regulations and if rezoned landscaping along the northern boundary would be necessary; future improvements may be required on • the site and the city is asking for site plan review for any future development on the property. Reviewing the rezone criteria Ms. Blauman said the subject site was not considered at the time of the last area-wide land use analysis; the property is properly classified for the zone that is requested as it is surrounded with commercial zoning; the change of zoning would be consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan and public utilities in the area will support the conversion to commercial use; and it is felt by staff that this request is timely as the surrounding infrastructure and public services are supportive. The lot is large enough to adequately support a neighborhood-type commercial development. Impacts from commercial uses on the site that may appear at a later date would be addressed at the time of site plan review. Staff recommends approval of this rezone with the applicant providing landscaping, fencing, a landscape maintenance surety device for a period of two years, restrictive covenants to ensure commercial use conformance with the Zoning Code, an agreement to participate in the provision of future utility and other public service improvements and an agreement to submit to site plan and environmental review for any exterior modifications to the existing or new development that may be on the site. • The applicant, CARL HAGLUND, 3308 South Judkins Street, Seattle. 98144 confirmed his acceptance of the information and conditions set out by Ms. Blauman, and had no further comment. 1 Carl Haglund R-097-90 February 11, 1991 Page 2 Not present, but requesting a copy of the Examiner's report was: Bob Fawcett. 305 - Second Avenue NE, Issaauah, 98027. The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak, and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 2:45 P.M. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicant, Carl Haglund, filed a request for approval of a rezone of approximately 57,584 square feet of property from R-1 (Single Family; Lot size - 7,200 sq ft) to B-1 (Business/Commercial). 2. The yellow file containing the staff report, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. 3. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the City's responsible official, issued a Declaration of Non-Significance (DNS) for the subject proposal. 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. 5. There was no opposition from the public regarding the subject proposal. 6. The subject site is located at 4016 Jones Avenue N.E. The site is southeast of the N.E. 44th Street I-405 interchange. The site is bounded on the south and east by N.E. 40th Street. 7. The subject site is an irregularly shaped parcel. It is shaped somewhat like a backwards 'L' with the crook to the northwest. 8. The subject site was annexed to the city with the adoption of Ordinance 1823 which was enacted in April, 1960. The single family zoning was applied at that time. 9. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of commercial uses, but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the Plan. 10. The site is provided with water and sewer service by the city, with lines located along Jones and N.E. 40th. Storm water drains into a channel that crosses the center of the subject site. 11. The single family home and accessory building located on the subject site have been converted to commercial uses. The conversion occurred prior to 1978 when commercial uses were still permitted in the R-1 zone. The building maintains its single family appearance. 12. While the original conversion was permitted, the current code makes the use a legal non- conforming use which may not be modified, enlarged or improved except within very specific limits. Therefore, the applicant has proposed reclassifying the site to B-1. B-1 zoning would permit normal repair and maintenance and enlargement and modification. 13. Single family uses are located north of the site. Commercial uses are located both south and east of the site. A mix of commercial and single family uses are located west of the site. A single family home is located in the crook of the 'L.' Staff and the applicant invited the owner of that property to join in this rezone but the owner declined to participate. 14. The zoning in the area reflects a mix of uses. The subject site is zoned R-1, while the site to the east is zoned B-1. The zoning north of the site is R-1. B-1 zoning is located adjacent to the 44th Street interchange north of the site. 15. There has been substantial development near the 44th Street interchange in the last five years. These uses included commercial and residential uses. Property south and east of the subject side has recently been annexed to the city. 16. Because the site wraps around a single family home on two sides and is close to other single family properties, staff has recommended that the site be subject to site plan review. Carl Haglund R-097-90 February 11, 1991 Page 3 17. With the conversion of the site to commercial zoning, staff has also recommended that the applicant provide a landscaping and fencing screen along property lines that abut the single family uses north and west of the site. 18. A tenant of the subject site imported some fill materials to the site. These materials were not approved, nor was the actual filling. A court action has been filed, and the site must be brought into compliance with city requirements. CONCLUSIONS 1. The proponent of a rezone must demonstrate that the request is in the public interest, that it will not impair the public health, safety and welfare and in addition, complies with at least one of the criteria found in Section 4-8-14, which provides in part that: a. The subject site has not been considered in a previous area-wide rezone or land use analysis; or b. The.subject site is potentially designated for the new classification per the Comprehensive Plan; or c. There has been a material and substantial change in .the area in which the subject site is located since the last rezoning of the property or area. The requested classification is justified and should be approved. 2. There has been no analysis of the zoning of the subject.site since it was annexed in 1960. It further appears that there was no special review of the conversion of the site from single family uses to commercial uses when the site was converted. 3. The area in which the site is located is designated for commercial uses by the Comprehensive Plan. A commercial node has been designated near the 44th street interchange of I-405. Staff has reported that there is sufficient capacity in the underlying infrastructure, including the roads and utilities, to support commercial uses on the site. 4. In addition to the Comprehensive Plan's designation of the site for commercial uses, the area has shifted from scattered single family uses to commercial uses, particularly north and east o the site. The reclassification of the subject site to B-1 would be a logical extension of the commercial zoning, although care must be exercised since some surrounding uses are still single family in character. The proposed reclassification will extend B-1 zoning further south and away from the 44th Street node. The result will probably hasten the conversion of the intervening single family uses. The fact that the site is already utilized for commercial uses makes the request more appropriate, and the fact that the Comprehensive Plan suggests that this would be the logical southern extent of the commercial node also supports this conversion. 5. Staff's recommendation that the site be subject to site plan review seems appropriate. Site plan review can be used to assure that any redevelopment of the commercial uses on the subject site is compatible with surrounding uses. 6. Similarly, the conversion of the site to B-1 should be accompanied by the installation of landscaping and screening between the incompatible zoning districts. While the use has been there for a number of years, the city did not thoroughly review the original conversion. Incompatible uses, according to the Comprehensive Plan, should be separated by a combinatio 0 of landscaping and fencing to soften the impacts on the less intense uses by the more intense commercial uses. 7. Any filling and grading that has occurred on the site shall remain subject to city review and approval. 8. In conclusion, the proposed reclassification, subject to the conditions enumerated above, is appropriate and should be approved by the City Council. Carl Haglund R-097-90 February 11, 1991 Page 4 RECOMMENDATION The City Council should approve the reclassification of the subject site from R-1 to B-1 sub j ct to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall install landscaping along all property lines not abutting a public street. The landscaping shall be supplemented by a wooden fence. The landscaping and fence shall be subject to the approval of the Planning Division. 2. The applicant shall post a bond in an amount to be determined by the Planning Division to insure that the landscaping survives its initial installation. 3. The applicant shall execute restrictive covenants requiring site plan review for any redevelopment of the subject site. 4. The applicant shall comply with all city requirements in regard to the filling and gradi g that has occurred on the site. No further filling or grading shall occur on this site without the issuance of a fill and grade permit. ORDERED THIS 11 th day of February, 1991. FRED J. FMAN HEARING EXAMINER TRANSMITTED THIS 11th day of February, 1991 to the parties of record: Carl Haglund 3308 S. Judkins Street Seattle, WA 98144 Bob Fawcett 305 Second Avenue NE Issaquah, WA 98027 TRANSMITTED THIS 11th day of February, 1991 to the following: Mayor Earl Clymer Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator Lynn A. Guttmann, Administrator Members, Renton Planning Commission Jim Hanson, Development Services Manager Gary Gotti, Fire Marshal Ronald Nelson, Building Director Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Jay Covington, Mayor's Executive Assistant Transportation Systems Division Valley Daily News Utilities System Division Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 15 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 P.M. February 25, 1991. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision ;of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment or the discovery of new evidence which could'not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 16, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of $75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the e request by the Court. ._ • ,.:,. • ir i I o • . // o 1 Gi , . , 1..... ;. • , ., .(03.a4.- • , ....• . I - .:r— 411 / 14 I `. ; ! i . r I li { : •: p � 1VV ms • g� ///, i � / t1. mG �12 i tv.:0py , , ,, /// ///' _.3 J • ..� 13• ,Ct: 1 ......!,.. ..../.. . . //'././ . (i. 0/ . / . 4..At' .'',1. ZZ ( j/ 1 _ • /7 • /:0////// //1:.' (/' ' • .+...• 4 J7J;f:17,i . r • . 11 FP -7( . tee 'I I.O • y n• I IP•� �b N / ST 2 R-1 ! 4 . I / •// / . . • • fi't. . \ I . i., r),I' I ./..,I V, . ... : ' 1. .i l• [ ' 1\ • • . . . ‘, • ....' R7 3 • .--...—.. ,, . .i . is . \ . N Tw ST r . • r 1 / ",I ,T ,'' — r t3 12 Ohl, I i t / :. eT • vs Ii /� • i , 101 -12 _ " .L f:> i' '1x __ _ ..._ j 177 — I `‘ .. _4_ I(i 1 • • rj I_ i ,1- _ ••61,�<t:.,)r,r )•iLL:;1.L•41-+i `1'•:V.t.1.'., ;t.i'; . i - , tt'il I • >✓t' ,, at U:1.•r,: •. :.•v ;l'•1't11:.tii r ' . ,'Ir _ . '(; • r' '.,4' i�?t;f3G; t, tf sTr;ou ij;.7,1.3�: il'-.-rI'i}. ._..`t:,.:E.,:.`-.' , i; 1[1, Rill.) '.t i:' tIJ:-:'- ?-;'.s"c,+10,1,iO c'Ji f E �,d:I j:FE.i41'}t(itr" 1c...; ,i 't'" 4"..'Si.t.t,7 k.)Y �I1i�.t' f -s. r" ,y.m,-,•..^.71.i1 :ii:• ;.. Carlt.t.Hagl,,un.0.ip'/ o4 1;.; c"q j. Al i.�a!"' .k,'`'it .f..t�-'�0'd ,;,x:•:::'Ki#30 1 �1 is ,C '� . I,':,` ');S�r�. 9 :•'. L :if, :4-';;'�,._,,s:. s'. ECF;R-09.7.7. 9 i.R,. • ci.4.:'.} i=Sil'a-ii.t rE"i t'i !+ % ,J 0?.) .y;s;..:, .2 : 1 . .)', ,°:'.,i ; .. ,. .1,, ,fti7,ti;t„rd,, ;4, {.'j(.!co.3, I.:..!.; `j:'•:it 1. 3 .. i, 'ri' •:''.LI- 1 • ,x , .t. :; L'• •1 .,,,; 41.'':isft,„t,'PJ.1 t:CAI{il 1' +i x -. : , •f �2. „• , aa (( ;.f,p.isr, • f'. •n;':g'�}'0 d::••?�FI,':v .y I�tj.i47` .t,.a ::^i7''i,:t('tI7;^a:ti.',l':..;,-•,,7 , ;;i L- yr;,i t 6,..',c Tt.O1T�ALs.:.ARE,A,'2. 57";,584' Sq•uare.• APPLICANT Carl Haglund `. •_ • ieet PRINCIPAL ACCESS " 'Jones NE .: , • , c9'..1.0,-? it"aii'I.g_ 4•CAVIpt.,, Ia; :}' .1; -,:,:, • of , • EXISTING ZONING Single Family• Resi delbial .Use E(R-1).ar'.•::;. _:,,,\'. ;. „c'`:G USE small bu i i? , 8.c. ri: - ,,, I . s Hess office=a"; -�„ ; � �; • EXISTING •;;, stiy.tl:9;Vs=::•iliN•4, 17•3,t ' ",i;. ... ,. _:,-, -.,t. . PROPOSED • USE small business office- , :'V:"' -•,'',• : • . " ,•;c14:e 9i.3; ix,{f3-,E:Q 1,i']l•)A;,etsi f ;? . COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN • Commercial''Us'e • .. c .e'"✓ • , .f :y; COMMENTS Loatd Fat 4016 "Jonesl'AVenue�,Ri . r. vMi,Ei:pc..;ir.';, "' ::.li.•." ,, i;i • . ;,,I.,..-;, • . r . - ., . ; Ga:. 1«rt63141:`a4!:',9,-ti,:6,,•g i ,r,'. ^:,E=1. . .:s ' 13 ;i;i"}'i • • .;)�"9 .,• - ..i•.. . .+..C. ar ,?;�.f;-`!.,1•0: why ilE°„ii4'gi.i\9• :.Cf y�:.Er"::yam, L.� I, • --- — - - — - - --- - - - -- - ---=-- -- - - • .• _ -•I-54 • � _ r _� \- / UNhPr>r �i' '• • . f J° / • 11 • VWih ui( I�' -, f / • i� ; b -- -It9.-, - / • • • r � 1 0 /I - - 1 I - r I Yam'O' � 1 • V ` p '- LPri7 42 ! 1 I v � I 1 /• r I 1 �/', f ■ I _ 1 - - . . 1 f4111p"t1 ,, -d r - / 1 omit f • .d,v ram, 1 _ 1 1. I 1jr;:146y421, ,. 1 r - - -1 i_ 1 Yet I/ , . �, f I r I• I / j I ► ' o f;r. . 4 5yX,) s Yttofb ~ w _ ,JUG 1 2 P.(V .. rolYti . - . . . , en I ' - s , -12 -' _,' • • - P-011-7 .-11/)<D • 1 ,. , . --. Lk-1 /Sti\\ 3r1 , , , -, .• r•",..-- ---- 1\-t -10-1674> • - , ' - - • , , , _ -.•:... - . . , , . _ . ' . - --__14.11,0•04-0 94' .A/ ." . ... -- , 7-Th blef172-1 _1/011,-1 rl .._ , 1 _ • 1 :,---- - 1 1 . , . 1 I I i-Lintw• • I ..1A-moci)-1-1 -Ai 1 —•4C1-tl.c.-7r027eft. 1-"'-; }--1 :_;111-1//\.<7 U/a1.-IF Az 1 ••••=mi , 4-,-.14---elk, ,-, )--Lrim• • • :" -rt.;t.-•!.. . .1 , -, r 1 ii. I , 1--4 ‘4,tiva, . • , • . . „._ . , 1 4- • ;•-, . _ i ,,,-. . f443774 1,a. I „.„ r-• —.4-- -7,z . _.,.c.,-- - _.. — 1 ")4 pLiL 1 I j,e 04., n! ,., .,-- . I 7 -.-...:•,'/-Tai, .,. I I -•,74.--,•.:,-.-c•-•- -,,: t:::,- - o•.,,' ,`-'. •,•-•1 -- .... e-•,<}-a'21.-='' ii'x30:1/\\•7 i 7 I'VO614idei- f. I Vr3 L:-‘1 . I Ill ... _...._ I..41 I _ ___LArtic II__ ,... :F. --...4.--: •,-,.'7:- --%Z--I--- - -- ----1- -.VoEvy ' 7-- -----____________________ 1;-- -i,..-, - . 7 I I I , I I . 1 I i II 1 , 1 1I1 - . • • . VV - - - ---- - - -- •( Vt •41.1 n 1_1(211.yil _ _ _ _ \ - . _ • , - I I ...................... .. r o PROJECT NAME: SUMMERWIND SHORT PLAT PROJECT NUMBERS: LLA;SHPL;V-147-90 • PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Applicant seeks: a) a short plat to redesign two existing lots with proposed Lot #1 to support an existing single-family home (discrete from the Summerwind development) and with Lot#2 to support a detention system for Summerwind #4/#5; b) a variance for j proposed Lot #2 to accommodate the fact that the parcel is designed with a depth/width ratio greater than that customarily allowed by the Renton Subdivision Ordinance; and c) a lot line adjustment to correct the boundary between the subject property and Summerwind #4 immediately to the west of this site by adjusting that line ten feet to the east.adjacent to Lots #1 -#8 inclusive. The project is located , at 4940/5000.Sunset Boulevard. • PROJECT NAME: HAGLUND REZONE PROJECT NUMBERS: ECF;R-097-90 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Applicant seeks a non-project, programmatic rezone of an approximately 57,584 square foot parcel from R-1, Single-Family Residential Use, to B-1, Commercial Use. The proposed rezone is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. The parcel is currently developed with a small business office in a residential-type structure which would remain on the site; no revision,to the existing use or new development is presently being considered, however, as the building is an older one, it is conceivable that redevelopment might take place in the foreseeable future. The project is located at 4016 Jones Avenue. ! ,..,1, i DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING APPLICANT: Carl Haglund PROJECT NAME: Haglund Rezone FILE NUMBER: ECF;R-097-90 LOCATION: 4016 Jones Avenue A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: Applicant seeks a non-project, programmatic rezone of an approximately 57,584 square foot parcel from R-1, Single-Family Residential Use, to B-1, Commercial Use. The parcel currently is developed with a small business office in a residential-type structure which would remain on the site; no revision to the existing use or new development is presently being considered. B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record: Carl Haglund ' 2. Applicant: Carl Haglund , . I 3. Existing Zoning: Single-Family Residential Use (R-1) 4. Existing Zoning in the Area: Single-Family Residential Use(R-1); Commercial Use(B- 1). 5. Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Commercial Use. 6. Size of Property: 57,584 square feet. 7. Access: • 'Jones Avenue N.E. 8. Land Use: Residential-type building used as a business office. 9. Neighborhood Characteristics: North: Single-Family Residential; Commercial Use. East: Commercial Use. South: Commercial Use. West: Commercial Use; Single-family Residential. i C. HISTORICAL/BACKGROUND: Action File Ordinance Date Initial Annexation --- 1823 4-21-60 PUBLIC SERVICES: 1. Utilities ir a. Water: A twelve inch water line runs along the south side of the subject property. An eight inch line runs along Jones Ave. N.E. immediately west of the subject site. b. Sewer: A sanitary sewer line runs south in Jones Ave. N.E.to a point adjacent to the northwest corner of the subject property. c. Storm Water Drainage: Storm water drains into the Gypsy Creek Drainage Collection Basin. f prelmrpt PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER Haglund Rezone PUBLIC HEARING February 7, 1991 Page 2 2. Fire Protection: Provided by the City of Renton as per ordinance requirements. 3. Transit: This site is not served by Metro transit. 4. Schools: Not applicable. 5. Recreation: Not applicable. E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1. Section 4-31-5, R-1 Residence District 2. Section 4-31-10, B-1 Business District 3. Section 4-8-14(C), Change of Zone Classification (Rezone). F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT: 1. Northeast Renton Plan, City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium, 1986 (pgs. 55 60). 2. Commercial Goal, Objectives and Policies, City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium, 1986 (pgs. 16-18). 3. Residential Goal, Objectives and Policies, City of Renton, Comprehensive Plan Compendium, 1986 (pgs. 14-16) G. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1. The applicant, Carl Haglund, is requesting a non-project, programmatic reclassification of a 57,584 square foot parcel of property from R-1 (Single-Family Residential Use) to B-1 (Business Use). i• Currently, there is one structure on the property, which was used historically as 1.a residence, but which has been utilized as a business office for more than a decade. Commercial uses were permitted in residential areas by the Zoning Ordinance when this structure was converted to an office. At the present time, commercial uses are not permitted outright In residential areas, and, therefore, the existing office is defined as'a legal, non-conforming use under the City's Zoning Ordinance. 1 The applicant is seeking reclassification of the site at this time so that the existing use becomes a conforming one. This will facilitate maintenance and/or improvement of the existing development. It will also enable the creation of a new development at the site at a future time,with appropriate/necessary City authorization. j 2. Representatives of various City departments have reviewed this application and have been generally supportive of the proposed rezone action. Their comments have been presented in the appendix to this report and have been integrated into the analysis of this application. II I 3. The Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of Non-Significance for the proposed non-project rezone on October 10, 1990. No mitigation measures were required • In conjunction with the Determination. 4. REZONE CRITERIA Section 4-8-14(C)(1) lists three criteria that the Hearing Examiner is asked to consider along with all other relevant information In making a decision on a rezone application. a. That substantial evidence was presented demonstrating the subject reclassification appears not to have been specifically considered at the time of the last area land use analysis and area zoning. prelmrpt • PRELIMINARY REPORT TO i nE HEARING EXAMINER Haglund Rezone PUBLIC HEARING February 7, 1991 Page 3 The subject property was annexed into the City in 1960 and was designated for single-family residential use (R-1) at that time. The property had been developed with a residence prior to annexation. Conversion to an office occurred prior to 1978, however City records do not indicate the precise date that the existing office was created. No structural changes were made to the residence on the parcel at that time. There is no information which Indicates that the subject property has been , specifically evaluated In conjunction with any area-wide land use analysis since the time of annexation. Neither has there been a previous request for rezone of II the parcel to B-1, Commercial Use. The present application is designed to establish the existing office development as a conforming and principally permitted use. The reclassification will also address City policies/regulations for commercial uses, for both the current structure and for future modifications/improvements to the site. b. That the property is potentially classified for the proposed zone being requested pursuant to the policies set forth In the Comprehensive Plan and conditions have been met which would indicate the change is appropriate. The subject property was designated for Commercial Use on the initial Comprehensive Plan Map in 1965; this designation was reconfirmed both in the Northeast Renton Plan established in 1986 and in the general Compendium review of 1986. No changes were made in land use zoning in the area in conjunction with these reviews. Properties in the neighborhood of the site are improved with a variety of commercial uses and residential developments (primarily single-family homes). As noted previously,the subject site is developed with a one-story, residential-type structure,which Is used as a business office. Public utilities (water and sewer) are provided to the area by the City of Renton. Utility lines are available to serve the site; improvements would be needed in the event that the use is modified at some future date. Similarly, storm water management systems, and rights-of-way/street are currently adequate -- or can easily be improved to be adequate --to serve the site as well as other commercial and residential developments in the area. Finally, the Police Department and the Fire Prevention Bureau report sufficient resources to serve this site. c. That since the last previous land use analysis of the area zoning of the subject property,authorized public Improvements,permitted private development or other circumstances affecting the subject property have undergone significant and material change. As noted previously In this report, the subject site is designated for Commercial ' Use on the Comprehensive Plan Map. Similarly,the proposed action is consistent with Comprehensive Plan Goals, Policies and Objectives for commercial zones both the municipality at-large and for this section of the City. For example, the Comprehensive Plan calls for: 1) the creation of sound commercial areas and for the revitalization of declining areas (V.A.); 2) commercial zoning should only be allowed to the extent of short term needs (V.A.1); 3) commercial areas should be located to minimize travel and congestion (V.A.4); and 4) commercial areas should be compatible with adjacent land uses(V.A.7). The site/area Is well-able to support the currently existing commercial development. New development could also be supported on this site. The parcel ' Is located on Jones Avenue near its intersection with N.E. 40th Street; both of these roadways are well-travelled commuting routes. The sites Immediately to the south, southwest, east and northeast of the subject property are zoned for/developed with commercial uses. Property to the north of the site is developed with a residence --the owner of that property was invited to participate in the proposed action, but declined to do so. Some other properties to the west of the site are also developed with residential uses. Because of the proximity of this property to properties developed with residential uses, staff would recommend that a covenant be established to require site plan , prelmrpt PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER Haglund Rezone PUBLIC HEARING February 7, 1991 Page 4 approval for any redevelopment of the parcel -- such a covenant would serve to encourage compatibility of design and use with and mitigate environmental impacts to that existing surrounding residential development. d. The final test to determine whether a rezone is appropriate Is to address the question of timeliness. Is it appropriate to rezone the subject property at this time? Staff believe that the proposed rezone Is timely for the following reasons: The reclassification can be categorized as an "infill" action. The subject property is located in an area which generally includes a mix of residential and commercial zoning designations and uses. The block on which the subject property is located reflects a similar combination of zoning and activities. As noted above, the Northeastern Section of Renton, in which the site is located, has been described as appropriate for new development, and growth is taking place in this area. The subject property -- while a single lot -- is of a size, configuration and dimensions which currently allows commercial use, and could be anticipated to satisfactorily support redevelopment. Because the property is proximate to a commercial development, residential areas, and major thoroughfares, it is reasonable to expect that commercial development on this site would continue to be viable and a positive addition to the community. Recommendations will also be established to ensure that new development on this site is compatible with surrounding residential uses. Impacts from new commercial uses on the site -- should such new uses be proposed at a future date--could likely be mitigated utilizing: 1. The Environmental Review Ordinance(4-6) 2. The Zoning Ordinance (e.g. Section 4-31-10, Commercial Use, Section 4-31-34 Landscaping, Section 4-14 Parking and Loading). 3. A restrictive covenant requiring site plan approval for any development on this site using criteria established in Section 4-31-33 of the Zoning Ordinance and related regulations. 4. A site plan which is acceptable to the State Department of Fisheries policies/regulations based upon the fact that a May Creek tributary traverses the subject property (see letter dated October 19, 1990 from Gail Kreitman,Washington State Department of Fisheries). Staff note that City facilities and services -- including public services, utility lines and roadways -- are generally currently available (as provided, or with minor modifications to accommodate Building/Zoning Code requirements) to this site and neighboring sites at a level sufficient to accommodate allowed development (Also see Section 4.b. above). I• • H. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommend that the Hearing Examiner recommend to the City Council in favor of the proposed rezone of the subject property(File#097-90) from R-1, Single-Family Residential Use, to B-1, Commercial Use,with the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall provide landscaping and/or wood fencing along the northern boundary of the site sufficient to provide a visual buffer between the site and the abutting residential development. The fencing and/or planting/landscaping irrigation plan shall be approved by and installed to the satisfaction of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department prior to the recording of the reclassification of the subject property with King County. • prelmrpt • it PRELIMINARY REPORT Tv I rIE HEARING EXAMINER Haglund Rezone PUBLIC HEARING February 7, 1991 Page 5 2. The applicant shall provide a landscaping maintenance surety device, to support new plantings,to be valid for a period of two years,to the satisfaction of the City Attorney, prior to the recording of the reclassification of the subject property with King County. 3. The applicant shall provide restrictive covenants to run with the land including: a) an agreement ensuring that all use/activity on the subject property shall conform with requirements established in the Zoning Ordinance for commercial uses; b) an agreement to submit an application for environmental review/site plan approval for any exterior modification to the existing development and/or new development on the subject site;and c) an agreement to participate in providing future improvements to utilities and other public services that benefit said site,at the time of site redevelopment. These covenants shall be provided in conjunction with approval of reclassification; documents shall be recorded with King County and placed on file with the City of Renton. 4. The applicant shall provide documentation that filling/grading undertaken on the site between 1989 and the present has been duly approved by the City of Renton and King County Superior Court. This documentation shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Attorney prior to the recording of the reclassification of the subject property. (Note: Environmental and land use review for future developments will include an assessment by the City Renton,the State Department of Ecology and the State Department of Fisheries, as well as other interested government agencies/private organizations of the impacts which such development might cause to the May Creek Tributary on the site.) • prelmrpt i . r7w r . •p11 }f 1 /�v 1 .I k riii,.,4,:,, , , ,. ' 1 �� I — iii ;!. is . • / I r I 1 • , 1 ,.,H1 ! ...- , . -iiiiiii,f);- e / If 1 , 1 1; +. Y' Ali ., ' , I S, i. 1-Ai‘....1... ,.• • • l IQiI kokitiN4a. 11,4 8-1 ,(. • i'"• k+{`t / 1 /;4// / 1S 41 T.'4ikt i'L , 'i,"f�, i / // 1 z ,y ,4 16 11 1i19 . H_ 1 / iB2. Ib7 s a ,, �; '6 z`• v. • N ) .) — 0 r•i a ^ re re w _ /7/./. /07/1.: •,1. PPtJD o59- "' A 1 ^� 1 b'� I., ICJ 1.1 7 N4 .1 IR N . / / +�R7. c ST r —R. -1 /i/ r , 1/ . . I: .l; 1 ,C 9 6 _\ 1 / I'. : „'„1•:'i psf\/,' . ' ; . ' • I'':3:t;ii,''t --->,R-3 ,7 ee••,, 1 6 t ) ) . • # '41 %' 15 ' • / . . \ •' - N .._ .JII �-- •—Ad-• V :1•--• ...__r • 89 N107jt Ime .. r l a �• / r/•i 87 105 r, ...—, 1 • . 104 1ib 311,• \.11 -- 9 6, I , i . Q. — 3 � J '1111 . � . 1, , 1. ® 1. Ilti I t 1 • Carl Haglund •• ECF;R-097-90 • APPLICANT Carl Haglund TOTAL AREA . 57,584 Square, feet • I PRINCIPAL ACCESS Jones Avenue NE , EXISTING ZONING Single-•Family Residential Use (R-1 ) EXISTING USE small business office • ' ' PROPOSED USE small business office COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Commercial Use • • COMMENTS Located at 4016 Jones Avenue 4 • r/ ' , ,.- • • 1 { 1 , . . SE 6/3"ST 1 c).),LAND USE ELEMENT . . ••\•/ • . I )\ i 1 • .4.- L. - • I • : i - ,• .,,, :..4 I . ••MMMMM I . Single Family I Commercial iikik . 1, ,./.'..::::;:§6: Az, 74. sT ..........••••••••• • ,./,./•::iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii. ii,is i • Office / Office Park 1 • Multi-Family „,. ,---.:.,.. ilii.•;;..:ii:.ji, Hi :.:.:•:.:•:•:•:•:•:. . ••. ..:.:.:.:. i . . In i . / I ill104 ---i . . 1 .:.......1....... "DOI .:i: :ii 1 .0000000 i • .::::::::, .sre,kNirk. Ant iiiiiiiii .. Medium. Density 00.00.0. Public , .0000.00-0-000°, / Quasi-Public ,- - .- .,.:.:....::: ......, look •.dinum .......:.• ........ imuZ, imitam Multi-Family .......0.0.0.00, 1 i i ali ",:..\IS MOH ilii , ,:•;, , i„,,,,....,.. ; ,4„... .1 .. . .• ,446. , um, i .1 .• • %iiimiin High Density 1 , , , , ,..,.:.i.,?,.,.......,i • Light Industrial i . 11.i..34. .- is, filing% Multi-Family . - li ., op . ......,.... ...,.. n , , ,0„ ,,,,,,, II • • i O ', lik:1 ..=_ Recreation . •••••• Heavy Industrial ;4# I cr• . :'•• 1. •; '' •_• • d ., ., . . .. - . .... it. _. , • . • ,.. • • : -L..,-.,I,". ' , I•of . L .. Greenbelt - --- Manufacturing Park .f / -,..,.. . ... ...I.. • ti';•• ^!'''''E 4,0.-r i,,,. / •:?.Z:•;*'•.1.•,.. 1 ., ..,. _ i •• • ./ Multiple Option / ( .04- -.v., • - iliac, A Revised April 1985 8 , • . 0 fn nal 1 •• . l'•Ct-e..*:..?.V,.1;',.!c ' "wit 4 •v.,:r. . ..,. 71/4. . . .. , . --T . . • . •,,,%. igsr,N • • . . • . . -%. Atitli:, • 1 . 1 .... ,it LAKE :::::: *::*: 1, ".. I ii,, - • 1.4 . 1 ••. ..':-f b*: w-A 1 r VI-.••P.:-,.,.t•.•..*p-i. .1.11..1W1...%.".A A,.„tS) H\,„•g: I...•...Na.,.,.•...•.--G.•.•..y.•.Ti••.....•.•".•O.-..-e.•"":•./.••N•..,••.•. •.•••.•• •.•4•••.••.•4.,••.•1,11'••.:, i••.f9.''j• Y1r. I•..• i.1:.t..:1 16,,..-4.*.,•4'.)i.•.,e ,i9iL.•.•,:.,.. 1.a1;V.s-:,,i,• Vi c,,.:'O, t,::•::i:i./_.:/...:.„:,.„.._„.:..„:,..:„.:„..:.1:./,„.:„,/..1:„.:„:•:.,..:„:.::1,rp(il.a... ..a..=..1 d __ L - tM::i : i1 - ert .-:. ..I . , ,. iI.i.ikillirrem.°.‘.. 1, , !'0•0'11116111111rik 7;21LT24. •••••••••••••••••• •••• ••• . .' )1 lini: .0000AI - --1 c'. I.'. • • • • • • • • • • • • • '.. :*i*i: MIMI' 1,:gnognogg ggiA• • • • • • • • • • • •• • i.. .:,„,, 1-1 rA.,&!tabi, le -- PR ME A ?,502-,o0o0og; , • • • • • • • • • • • • • ,:,, .::., E. .. ,,, 00...nd000 „A pte)pilit,Air• • • • • • • • • ., :. rillialim,_ 111111.= Aggggsggsklyme•iii;••••• ••••••• • • ••_!ii• ,..... li UM' "IIM I 1°2'7 ik ca;.,11:1 : • •f 4,,' , .. • IM11.11 fikA.A t:gogq gao 4. • • • • • • • • L -'1____1111111 " :V.igiF, 82,8i, ' e••••••• •••••• • • • • ". • • • le • ',,,,ii, milligin .; IMIIIMIM i4rggg TO; . • • • • [ ••• 1' •:•:•:t:e ';',..,: '. 11 __ mom mu „ moot • • • 1 . ; :: og,.,.... • • •i . • • • • • .3.4 . ; :640:0 g00.,i 1 . • • • .41t • • • 4 • -. X • • ILI.;sigg.94ggs 4 t. . . Irg lio. .::i5hi:1%.......... ..,- .•:lk II?ggMfg°:V•-•-• liiiiiiiiiniiiiiiiiiiiniiii: S • • •. i• 7.1).. cif 1 I 7.- '"?.ri: ::goOgggilk!' ••••• ;.'g::=.`;;;!,1 ViaileVP, aksis•cohLig 1 11.MEM• 11 °;;Blgtfigoligol. kg-itio6i.i14"111111:1•.'•°"6.4:1.(7/1 iltpi..`..--fe ‘ ra Agiinia im„ ivrith,,, _a•_._ i) , . --j 6' f 11 EllOsigEgi."'50A,tffiliillry.:*• Av v...iiii.,.:.ND -i illiggeitAgRe ilr. oteli, .11111k.:':. • , it., ,... ..,..,A01 .. . . .00,0600., . `1.-3,3. • In _o 0 0 0 o, o oc.....o020:44•101411:1111 .1113:4 ,02 .z.,.•. , 1 • ..11.1000000000. "Want -"ION . ' • V;;a4P <4011,446.ad--:I... ,, '..eifirs. IBM"Wish°Ill"law 1111•;::' °.°9A ,,. -•,,..4,41. NW . ..---4(ftlitiji tr. •0000000 1 1 111111447PMY rir/ 7.. 4 / •oc)0(.0 •,..,. ., mum ,•0 0000ecp. „,1 1. \lb. _. ..,f .(% .. ,/ ',o'Clob 14"..10410 III ,104,, o.• A I c.,00:3000g000g000=0000 iii.in iliketp.k..,...41.,.(7,.. .i.:.....44.!, :.....,:. I ...°cPOIP....oC .....°),I'L.$1..•;.,..1:1.,.:,;•.:rfs---- Nelda 44.44,441::65;- B„, &___ . .04,11.112!1:11ro'•-/ -tacM4.4r-611 4%, .• --.'.: ..:iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiti:,:....'.'''. v ..,, „ . • , . • 41Not.,1421!.!: 0./ r liiiiiniiiiiiiiiiiiiigiiii:ii$:::•:,..:.'..,'.61;1'' t',',[.‘:.;C)7\a, 11111111141111111111..1:, --.. me. 4. 4., PO 1171P. ...."••••'''...' 'n.''. I. ...6. (t.'.CI.I.., .t..• •:'..1•••C1::4A'i;;;t:14:U,17;';'Nillifill "gli;iiikli Ili-- alp rill In I i ii ii t a i'd 1,;03,,..p .' . ..• . 1.esi,),,,4% .”1• , ..:•:.:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:::•:•:•::••• if l'K%C..3"4(1*.. . 1 '•C'•p•''• •• \ .mum,fisa. Arlitesp1"110, 110ammiamil arriiim :i.*:?i,c1", :IISP....*-1‘_.,3%.0 4.4•'eift-SI - ..:•:•:.::::-:•:.:.:•:•:•:•:•:. .,,,ik.„ ,.,4 . - -,•,:t, . -.^...,., IS i aninoultil No MIN!!••in, ....limitgo, •,,•,i•.',...• •64:1•;••7•Eri•;(••. 11111k.41.4.P.•• Milniiiiiiii: •4 PI";'e• • ----:-:.-E-E-7--7:- . '‘3....::•;%.--,.s.`41,11- ...ectIdAl MR MIMI - ti i:i:::itiK:,;,...•' IN NMI, . • ', `c!'s:t•:. .4;-•re, 111iii. .,...e, \ :00r•,'' 'r k:•-,0$ • c 'clm ••••.; ::iiiiiii.i:ii::K:i:iiiiii l'Is1:1. --_-:-=-:-_-_-_-_-_-_-_ .,-,. *-::::c..................... ga , •••11' • ',:i:i:::v .>c a I- - ' ''-g:.•,,`F,';‘`i,',,......-;•.P.O''W .4::: i:--i,7:•4i-::i--::,.-:.•-,.'-,:.•,,,.:=..,-,..._='',.%._-.-•;._?.--:,,-,-•,;,:„,1.!,".±i;,:=-:..•TzR.,,.-,r:,?.,...-.-0••_-.--._-_--.,.7.P•:E-. -,2:=--_L-1-__-_;_--:--_41_--12-4_-_--_-__•--__0--S-__-i-_:r-_-.,_._..--L_.-,-..._--:i:i-.,ili-iii:•.i-iii ii-imi i-iii i-0i iii..i.-i:m:i-11l 1m1m..i=1_.m111..0 0rn.e...u.r.l..r..,.r,t.e1a.Mi„.I..wW.OaN..r.a.Mr..ra.n,;0r-1;r10":,i::i,iO::i•i:i•:i•r::i"ai•::::i::::,' i,. g'5.v.i , . , , , •• ,.. . ____ iiiiiiii m , ......i:;...,f.,)•::,::,i:,).k},0•r:e'-.;.,,, , P- - . t i _- 41 =-__-_- m . 1 - -tte ____ 6L -__ _- n-.,•,•„-4:rc.4',in'.,16.•1,,4,,t.:,,,1„.p,"i..",•• C7 e " 1. •.00000l - •I'Ltii. I ce• ‘ ------------. ..0-00 "" --------:-:-.7.----- --:----------------.=-Essimeamerammi ogo 1119"111111,' III,61 000.00/00:, • .::9)..N, *.(1.1 7-111P-Avia- 00.6.• -,------------- ---------------- --,11.1111.FAIRM go°1 1111411r :- ,...••'4 o0g .1 . .c if. ..°0°0 • ',,„(q 5% .0•30•3000 t.....1. -- -_ __, 0 III - - ..,." "Cc,°' -••.1A",',?''',- CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO.: ECF-097-90 , APPLICATION NO(S): R-097-90 PROPONENT: Carl Haglund t' PROJECT NAME:. . Haglund Rezone , DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Applicant seeks a non-project, programmatic rezone of an approximately 57,584 square foot parcel from R-1, Single-Family Residential Use, to B-1, Commercial Use. The proposed rezone Is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. The parcel is currently developed with a small business office in a residential-type structure which would remain on the site; no revision to the existing use or new development is presently being considered, however, as the building is an older one, it is conceivable that redevelopment might take place in the foreseeable future. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 4016 Jones Avenue LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works • Development&Planning Section The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This Information is available to the public upon request. • There is no comment period for this Determination of Non-Significance. 7 Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee• c/o Don Erickson, Secretary Development Services Division Department of Planning/Building/Public Works 200 Mill Avenue South Renton,WA 98055 You may appeal this determination in writing to Renton Hearing Examiner no later than 5:00 p.m., October 29,/1990. To appeal this Declaration, you must file your appeal document with the hearing examiner within fourteen (14)'days of the date the Declaration of Non-Significance is final or the Declaration of Significance has been published In the official city newspaper. See City Code Section 4-6-23, RCW 43.21C.075 and WAC 197-11-680 for further details. There shall be only one appeal of a Declaration of Non-Significance or Declaration of Significance, and if an appeal has already been flied, your appeal may be joined with the prior appeal for hearing or may be dismissed if the other appeal has already been heard. i You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact City of Renton, Community Development Department to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. PUBLICATION DATE: ��h° +r 1 J) lain O , 1 1 DATE OF DECISION: OC6 QLr ID) 19 9O > SIGNATURES: '' l /? ( / 2 .- n /.—70- Y 6 ,; Lynif (Guttmann,A mintstrator DATE ✓ •�bepartment of Planning/Building/Public Works ,1' ' I:54 ._ ' '‘ 1 Joh E.Webley,Administrator d DATE Cmunity Service Department ./ ,r,e% /1 ) , 7 • . •(1)11(1. lei,,I re 'lef .-'• - `� / DATE Rere Department mllslg • ' DEPARTM___ r OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PU C WORKS ,1 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET • ECF-097-90 APPLICATION NO(S).: R-097-90 PROPONENT: Carl Haglund I. PROJECT TITLE: Haglund Rezone BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks a nonproject programmatic rezone of an approximately 57,584 sf parcel from R-1, Single-Family Residential Use to B-1, Commercial Use. The parcel 'is currently developed with a small business office. No revision to the existing use or new development is presently being considered. Rezone would result In a nonconforming use becoming a conforming use. Any change to the use would require site plan approval under the Zoning ordinance. LOCATION: 4016 Jones Ave TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 9/21/90 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION CURRENT PLANNING LONG RANGE PLANNING PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON SEPTEMBER 13, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: refork.% 8v 'tSP�.Y(9 tdV1 APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED • • I 2 I DATE: Fs SIG ATURE 0 IRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 5/90 11 UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT, COMMU TY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION CURRENT PLANNING LONG RANGE PLANNING PARKS'AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMME NTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE gEPTEMBER 13. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Csn'1 _-- NOT APPROVED APPROVED PPROVED WITH CONDITIONS a 7/K S ) 17-e. s PA-0 a ‘5, y kiv--a ob-dtiki DATE: SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 5/90 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT DIVISION: fre--- PGu2-r14-Lr APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED .,wit e. V .• DATE: a � /9 9' SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE •I u REV. 5/90 r C�vu+.�.,_ ., MAJOR 4, + kiiVip,i.-,J4 zi MPACT"rit=Vtew ON ENVittQi3 Et lAL ELL'N1-t d t • MINOR 1�ECESCA[t"f IMPACT • • "TACT r • - 1. Earth illNIIIIIIIIIIIIII II 2. Air IIIIIIIIIIIINlll 1, 3. Water C 4: Plants 5. Animals I i 6. Energy&Natural Ref ources 7. Environmental Healr 6. Land &Shoreline Ube 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics i 11. Light&Glare_. 12. Recreation I 13. Historic&Cultural Preservation 1 14. Transportation,. 15. Public Service, 16. Utilities .I a.xq�, - 1 1 COMMENTS _ _ � , ` � s ?�� • �� �L J 1*G/'Cr �--r2/ A::'Ci-A-- I 2‘8--• lail-ej,..,61. 2-7-'‹Kt-'" ..1e4-.17,4_61-Ce.,Cle,,Lee_C--e--- '....4* ' . 6:40"7'0',,,X61-e.L:-/.L..g' - -e.C.,a. ;.L., , 9Z-.L .-_-. ---.1,e 17.- --- ." -e-,•-•.--' ‘/-,l'e/ 1' li °2 ep_c e ;2(e y�✓.� '� ,„?g-- _,. ._,-,1_40_,,„,. .7 .a.c . .„,,-,r ---r-ce-_ -1''-/-&-e- e. C- --e4- 6/6--- 11r77 expertise and have identified .2-6-1- -e-- ----4.g--) in which we have We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areassal. areas of a impact or areas where additional information Is needed to properly assess this propo • !C � D e • Signature of Direct&or Authorize Representative Rev.6/88 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: e44 NOT APPROVED' I APPROVED • APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 1 60.0 G4c i'n c/4.17 ez4 W 4e r L JZ - / Ga Z.--". l'a 'N/, ,v`' �' zdwe ik ' KG«G� G f Gr', 4 0&-1 f "Nb`i G 'vawS' c % /Gyu//'PAS. /D / r aaa /5" 141)/(44 Ler4010e'a.e--' 'Gr/ _//,77 /2es.�.•G.al`'/ DATE: 1,//_____/—L-. -* ;TL SIGNATURE OF DIRECTO AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 5/910 -/ UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION CURRENT PLANNING LONG RANGE PLANNING PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT _OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS DIVISION BYN5:00 SHOULD BE SEPTEMBER 13, PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLAN 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: _ APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED ' 1 i ' aVreSia DATE: _ SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. /90 - i REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: `J . i/e 1 APPROVED v APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED \i/LT1 /9""""gi /11/ /etcq- 1 #.- ',it' 1 • 11 l�/c1. '/�/ pj j� ✓�%irp. �t, „/ln jjo / A CC2 z 91 p `�`� 7 if04,0-v-ed ' , \ , DATE: // S' /596 SIG ATURE CF D RECTOR OR UTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE I REV. 5/90 - _ I' TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHLDULL°IitAMINU IJIA i : ' I UTILITIES E..... DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION • T i CURRENT PLANNING LONG RANGE PLANNING PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS.OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING.' PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON SEPTEMBER 13,E 1990. REVIEWIN DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: fv,a-•-•88-,4�7.-XLA '-1 s%'s��I • APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED I Ns cl 14 /r a-�._s(moo et i i d I-, --sjsCks31 54 jam/ DATE: SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED RE RESENTATIVE REV. 5/90 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: . A//72tC V APPROVED. yAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVE ti ,q a . 1 I, P /i j A:A- • DATE: /0 ,S7//996 SIGNA-TIRE OF DI ECTOR OR THORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 5/90 ■: r APPLICATION: f DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET / L 'ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET E1 PLAN REVIEW ROUTING SLIP O OTHER � DATE: 7'/D*- 94 APPLICANT: -- 6,44- • JOB ADDRESS: .1140/ - 7"0�.t,ai l • ii• . NATURE OF WORK: • 521/PROPERTY MANAGEMENT in 3,-q0 DATE RECEIVED • Comments Due BY PROPERTY MGMT. q - go . Comments or suggestions regarding this application should be provided in writing. Please provide comments to the Comm. Bev. Dept.(C.D.D.) by 5:00 p.m. on above date. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION . )11-4+1611-4$424' l EcEES APPLIED CANNOT APPLY FEES El LEGAL DESCRIPTION O NEED MORE INFORMATION O SQUARE FOOTAGE O FRONT FOOTAGE O VICINITY MAP It is the intent of this development fee analysis to put the developer/owner on notice, that the fees quoted below will apply to the subject site upon development of the property. All quoted fees are due and payable at the time the construction permit is issued to install the on-site and off-site improvements (i .e. underground utilities, street improvements, etc.) - PROJECT COST LATECOMER LATECOMER AGREEMENT - WATER NO PER. FTG. FEE CITY HELD D PRIVATE DEVELOPER HELD - --4 - LATECOMERS AGREEMENT - SEWER ' I. CITY HELD — 0- PRIVATE DEVELOPER HELD —D - SPECIAL UTILITY CONNECTION CHARGE - WATER UNITS SUCC FEE ! Single family residential dwelling unit $300/lot x Apartment, Condo, each multiplex unit $175/ea. unit x �s � �. , Commercial/Industrial $.-O41'sq. ft. of property x ,57--6-8•f ■ /2( SPECIAL UTILITY CONNECTION CHARGE - SEWER Single family residential dwelling unit $300/lot x Apartment, condo, each multiplex unit $175/ea. unit x Commercial/Industrial $,04/sg. t, of property x .5Z,'2/ gt( l0o`F�f. ,� • Dlo3¢ SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT jHospital_Area) WATER UNITS SAD FEE DEVELOPMENTS WITH 1500 GPM TIRE FLOWS OR LESS: Area Charge $0.03, p. sq.ft. x Frontage Charge $ 6 00 per front ft. .x DEVELOPMENTS WITH GREAT,' TFIAN 1500 GPM FIRE FLOWS: Area Charge $0.0, : per sq.ft. x I Frontage Charg= $1: .00 per front ft. x 0- SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRIC (Honey Crk. Intercptr) - SEWER UNITS SAD FEE AREA CHARGES: ! Residential dwel ing upits, apartments or equivalents, $2 o .per dwelling unit x 1 Commercial develo'm• t: $.05 per sq.ft. oI gross site area x FRONT FOOTAGE CHARGES. $37.19 per Fro F . (on ea. side) x $74.38 per f .ft. (p 'tv .on both sides of imprv,) x Q Ll/GII 8' TOTAL: s9 /� e5�. 37 7 e a ove ?i1I*tii' ees o. 0 nc u e nspec on ees, si a sew r p s, r/w permit fees r the ost of Ovate met rs. • )� Gs/'M , 0-c16.4.1. b/t . it DATE__7—/4 - 9d b Signature of Director or Authorized Representativ IDfEPARTi{ @.ii i Ur FLAIllIVi14�f uva........... , - — DEVELOPI _ IT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEI j ECF-097-90 APPLICATION NO(S).: R-097-90 � PROPONENT: Carl Haglund. . I PROJECT TITLE: -Haglund Rezone BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks a nonproject programmatic rezone The of an • • approximately 57,584 sf parcel from R-1, Single-Family Re Residen Use to tial lion to 1, Commercial al Use. new parcel is currently developed with a small b , development Is presently being considered. would Rezone a site plan approval underould result In a �heoZoning ordinance.becoming a conforming use. Any change to the useq 4016 Jones Ave I LOCATION: I l i I TO: - • PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 9/21/90 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION.BUREAU ' POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION CURRENT PLANNING • • • LONG RANGE PLANNING PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT • OTHERS:________--.--•----- COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION BY SHOULD BE.M. PROVIDED EPI EMB WRITING.. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: • NOT APPROVED • APPROVED' APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS L/0A,5€.1",/ z,?r,i-t-cdfr/eGet'-e--- 69'4' - 6-1,-4 Lik-‘,%.- DATE: - ����- rrn�ri �E SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR A�ITHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE I V • REV. 5/90 •-- ; • • • • • _ — n�G ua1.S1/`\'}a �}l 14 ,NQr" °I •-2. aVA l r►2I1\cictrl ktn-l4It . • you ' - -4y4lr l l saY PA-724 cyoilAti 1 crauwn1 - - -- 1 i I • _ `: I 14. p p , p I -„,w,� -� 1. I 41 I 1 1 I ,....,°'�`,od bearooN4 '' 'al - .a I { 1ril _ - TJJ _I ; . I I I { I "0 I 1' I I-e. 1 I-41- I , I I4%441/Q1-1K7 4001.\--?.A I I 1 ; • • • bb — ` I • NoRTkI • —r ` ``� �, hFiF� 1,, '/ 1 I Ied 1 ° / ,'I .0 art I / 1 li �" / I • / / 1 . . . . 1 ..• I • 1 / I . -- —IZ1.7 -- 1\ /•• /4, 1 a • I s ' • ._ _ _ 0 1 . 1 . • 7 I . I 1 • 1 ° I . -, .� x� / a v 2,..,,,oe g, 1 . 1 . ,, . I .,„ , 1 ... 1 • ,.....< , _ IT •• • // - / I I I ' / i . • . i , , , I 4hrn.. 6v'r'" foiiiwt, I1 I 1 > • 11 1 l'ilP;',1"7",e;,,_ - ----- p 1 1 • / / / I ► 4fv.1I1• 1 1 , I i •1 i---- --i i 2� -, \° Ili -- In, -- /- 11 1 . 14 • . d .: aF.04a, y,+a�� �� wktsp • t,f } • =..Jar W7 P'`� _. t 1ty • o 09'A../Po lc ,,,,,,,,,,Npd ,i....2•1011 . • • . ..ir,:,.. . - 1.7-4411:11 I 1 zar)41-1._clev. _ _ - • . ,gtivioaod 1-21-41k4O04 0 0 CI 0 ' . . . 1 1 . 1 . .. . 2 . . . I , . . i.3702,14,,,twAl • . . . - i•VAL i . • 2, ,m_pcid •--ramah,2, I 1, • . • - . >frau lik-i*fne., .,,,,oz,„,_.„0,21,,,d_ 1 . .4pityokivemm— — 1441.1e,iiita/ i • 1 • .',/---N, 0 G _ ),,,,,• , . . , 4/4/0 . ,-i2.1.1tv4 ..7i_ •* . 2 t./.622.14,.i.,7e147,. ,a1921400-1. (a I 1 . . , i I . . . I . . . I ' —LAI icniKI 171.1)0 7 • • • . . -r-akirl_ • . . _ 4-10 4 te? . W,. - I . . . I . . • , ' 0 I • Z4P 1 OAVOIV,411 . . . . . . . . • • : I • • . . I . . . . . . . . . I/ 1 . • . . . • . . . . . . . . , . oF E. @ ° ) NOTI >,9gTEO sEpi„ City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner will hold a _ PUBLIC HEARING :,,, ,. , in CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS. CITY HALL ON FEBRUARY 7, 1991 BEGINNING AT A.M. 2:00 P.M. 1 CONCERNING: HAGLUND REZONE ECF;R-097-90 DESCRIPTIONAPPLICANT SEEKS A NON-PROJECT, PROGRAMMATIC REZONE OF AN APPROXIMATELY 57,584 SQUARE FOOT PARCEL FROM R-1, SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USE, TO B-1, COMMERCIAL USE. ' THE PROPOSED REZONE IS CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THE PARCEL IS CURRENTLY DEVELOPED WITH A SMALL BUSINESS OFFICE IN A RESIDENTIAL-TYPE STRUCTURE WHICH WOULD REMAIN ON THE SITE; NO REVISION TO THE EXISTING USE OR NEW DEVELOPMENT IS PRESENTLY BEING CONSIDERED, HOWEVER, AS THE BUILDING IS AN OLDER ONE, IT IS CONCEIVABLE THAT REDEVELOPMENT MI HT TAKE PLACE IN THE FORESEEABLE FUTURE. - er 6Y •� t I ,• ti WIJI k.,far L+ ri ' 1-1-1 r A., ,_, ri ,,.,. ___TH . I !i__1. r i-----d--- , i GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS: 4016 JONES AVENUE FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION 235-2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT herptr PROPER AUTHORIZATION > CERTIFICATION I , Mwegj Save, 16. , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT 3 0 CUPIES • THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN - • , CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON OR NEARBY THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY ON 1 - !-sosseemioosa4 -q i , I ��0 CUES.C.a •�� 1 • �,40: 8Bee::r�'••1�sworn to before me, a a• uQ i �'• the State of Washington I , resiifing ia. ij. t on the ____ Lode._ Itaat : 2i ,SIGNED : . �aA �l�ode.. , .tee, . ..aj.� ,, (.�i3O�• WASa����n • F OF R�4, 0 4 NOTICE U t$ © z C IM ... o9/TEO SEPS��OP City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner will hold a , PUBLIC HEARING , in CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY. HALL ON FEBRUARY7, 1991 BEGINNING AT • A.M. 2:00 P.M. CONCERNING: HAGLUND.REZONE • EC F;R-097-90 DESCRIPTIONAPPLICANT SEEKS A NON-PROJECT, PROGRAMMATIC .I REZONE OF AN APPROXIMATELY 57,584 SQUARE FOOT PARCEL FROM R-1 , SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USE, TO. B-1 , COMMERCIAL USE. THE PROPOSED REZONE IS CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THE PARCEL ' IS; CURRENTLY DEVELOPED WITH A SMALL BUSINESS OFFICE IN A RESIDENTIAL-TYPE STRUCTURE WHICH WOULD REMAIN ON THE SITE; NO REVISION TO THE EXISTING USE OR NEW DEVELOPMENT IS PRESENTLY BEING CONSIDERED, HOWEVER, AS THE BUILDING IS AN OLDER ONE, IT IS CONCEIVABLE THAT REDEVELOPMENT MI HT TAKE PLACE IN THE FORESEEABLE FUTURE. ri _ ; lEIII ! ;irT1 ' . . ( Jo r_l_i x j 1 i j i 1 . • Yr I i 1 2 M'I' 0 1 ' ( r -- U i 1 — ..- ' • ik 1 1 H 1 ' -----ri 0 1.4 , 1 1 . 1 2 r--g ....._ ___ 1 gf :11-- . I 1 4\1 I . GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESSn� II 4016 JONES AVENUE FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF ' RENTON PLANNING DIVISION ' 235-2550 ' THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE ' REMOVED WITHOUT hexpstr PROPER AUTHORIZATION ' L• CITY OF RENTON FEB U 41991 RECEIVED CITY CLERK'S OFFICE AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION 510 67 .fit VY. 96 Kathleen Hoover ,being first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the VALLEY DAILY NEWS • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week. That said newspapers RENTON HEARING EXAMINER are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six RENTON,willbeheld WASHINGTON A Public Hearing be h by the Renton months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King the Council Chambers on the second floor County, Washington. The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal of City Hall, Renton,Washington,or Febru- ary 7, 1991 at 2:00 p.m. to consider the newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for following petitions: King County. HAGLUND REZONE ECF;R-097-90 Applicant seeks a non-project, p'ogram- Thiiiotice in the exact form attached, was published in the Kent Edition matic rezone of an approximately 57,584 X , Renton Edition , Auburn Edition XX , (and not inX square foot parcel from R-1, Single-Family Ressupplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers Theideopol Use, ot ein, Commerc al Use. PP g Y proposed rezone in consistent with the during the below stated period. The annexed notice a Public Notice City's Comprehensive Plan. The parcel is currently developed with a small business office in a residential-type structure which (Notice of Public Hearing) 5246 would remain on the site, no revision to the existing use or new development is present- ly on January n u a x y 2 7 . 19 91 • being considered, however, as the build- Was publisheding is an older one, it is conceivable that redevelopment might take place in the fore- seeable future. The project is located at The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the ao1 Jones Avenue. 44.96 Lee gal description of the files, noted sum of$ above are on file in the Development Ser- vices Division, Third Floor, Municipal Build- ing,_ f ��� Renton. ✓�( 151-64— All interested persons to said petitions areet invited to be present at the Public Hear- ing on February 7, 1991 at 2:00 p.m. to express their opinions. Published in the Valley Daily News Janu- Subscribed and sworn before me this 3 T s t day of Jan. 19 91 ary 27, 1 ss1 52as Public for the State of Washington residing at Auburn, King County, Washington • VDN#87 Revised 4/89 • NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON,WASHINGTON A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, Renton, Washington, on February 7, 1991 at 2:00 p.m. to i; consider the following petitions: HAGLUND REZONE ECF;R-097-90 Applicant seeks a non-project, programmatic rezone of an approximately 57,584 square foot parcel from R-1, Single-Family Residential Use, to B-1, Commercial Use. The proposed rezone is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. The parcel is currently developed with a small business office in a residential-type structure which would remain on the site; no revision to the existing use or new development is presently being considered, however, as the building is an older one, it is conceivable that redevelopment might take place in the foreseeable future. The project is located at 4016 Jones Avenue. 1 Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton. All interested persons to said petitions are invited to be present at the Public Hearing on February 7, 1991 at 2:00 p.m.to express their opinions. Publication Date: January 27, 1991 - • I. Account No.51067 • 1 hexpub 40 4$' CITY 1.,_ F RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann,Administrator January 23, 1991 Carl Haglund 3308 S Judkins St Seattle,WA 98144 SUBJECT: Haglund Rezone ECF;R-097-90 Dear Mr. Haglund: The date of Thursday, February 7, 1991, at 2:00 p.m., has been set for rezone review for the above- referenced matter. The hearing will be held in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, Renton,Washington. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you before the hearing. If you have any questions, please call 235-2550. Sincerel t, Donald K. Erickson,AICP Zoning Administrator cc: Caryn Spain Charles Dietsch Clarissa Fawcett J W H Chellson Fryc Oldrich James Evaold S ,I II�� • 1 • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 %0 CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann,Administrator November 2, 1990 • Carl Haglund 3308 S Judkins St Seattle,WA 98144 SUBJECT: Haglund Rezone ECF;R-097-90 Dear Mr. Haglund: This letter is to inform you that the appeal period has ended, for the Determination of Non-Significance- Mitigated, on the above-referenced project. No appeals were filed. However, aletter of informati:�n, submitted by Department of Fisheries which may be of interest to you, is attached. A tentative public hearing date of February 26, 1991 has been established. If you have questions or desire clarification of the above, please call Lenora Blauman at 235-2550. For Environ ental Review Committee, Donald K. Erickson,AICP Secretary cc: Caryn Spain Charles Dietch Clarissa Fawcett J.W. H. Chellson Fryc Oldrich James Evaold 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton. Washington 98055 - 1 tL r - CITY .OF RENTON "LL Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann, Administrator v I l 11 November 2, 1990 1, Carl Haglund 3308 S Judkins St ;i; Seattle,WA 98144 i' SUBJECT: Haglund Rezone 1 ECF;R-097-90 , 11 Dear Mr. Haglund: j This letter is to inform you that the appeal period has ended, for the Determination of Non-Significance- Mitigated, on the above-referenced project. No appeals were filed. However, a letter of information, submitted by Department of Fisheries which may be of interest to you, Is attached. 1 A tentative public hearing date of February 26, 1991 has been established. If you have questions or desire clarification of the above, please call Lenora Blauman at 235-2550. For the Environmental Revie ' ee, 1 cDo / II Erickson, ICP Secretary i l 'i I ,I cc: Caryn Spain 3308SJudkinsSt Seattle,WA 98144 - 1' , 1 !I , i ' I , , 1 II 1' noeppeel/DKE/kee 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2569II %4 @ CITY OF RENTON "u. Hearing Examiner Earl Clymer, Mayor Fred J.Kaufmat• MEMORANDUM ��DATE: JANUARY 14, 1991 TO: Lenora Blauman, Senior Planner FROM: Fred J. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner SUBJECT: Change In Scheduling Summerwind and Haglund As we briefly discussed today, due to an exceptionally full calendar; on February 5th - the Summerwind and Haglund hearings will have to be rescheduled. You may contact both applicants, Summerwind and Haglund, and adviser, that we will hold their hearings on THURSDAY, February 7, 1991 beginning at 2 : 00 PM. The above date is the -best accommodation we can make at this time. Lets hope it is agreeable with all parties concerned. If this presents a problem -contact my secretary. cc: Earl Clymer, Mayor Jay Covington, Mayor's Executive Assistant Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator Mark Pywell, Senior Planner 11 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2593 0 M CITY. . ....O F. .......................... .. ...CURRENT,:`;PLANNING.,::DIVISION.� ::..:::;;;::.;:.;;:.;;:.::;.;::.;>;:.;>:.:.;::::.::.::......:....:... :: ... .......::.:: <: : ; AF FIDAVIT DAV I F;SERVICE BY MAILING : , On the 01:51.S day of I'atelt.t.a KA , 19 91 , I deposited in the mails of thettnited States a sealed envelope containing P .P . em7t arci iletriAcla_ documents . This information was sent to: Name Representing C.aYLr SI n ' (Signature of Sender) S' r•4,t. L. 5�,m, • Sub cribed �v nErti4 to me this cWd day of , / 19 �/ �• OW J,A*♦ w. . N 1• PUBLIC Not Publ in and for the ro y �G UBLIC ,'? St t of Wa ington residing '•.♦>..: , j9cp. O'�e' a t ♦♦'OA.WASN`NC,�,�� ♦ therein. ,.f,,nunn•I '•. Project Name: I Project Number: -» Den „10 STATE • 0 4 ' i iii ifii' -'..i6fIF ` PLANNING DIVISION JOSEPH R. BLUM Director • - ''ec a°'' CITY OF RENTON 1889 STATE OF WASHINGTON OCT 2 3 1990 DEPARTMENT OF FISHERIES g • rpn 115 General Administration Building • Olympia, Washington 98504 • (206) 753-6600 a ( A 'j2 4'6`6 October 19, 1990 En 'ironmenta:L Review Committee c/p Don Erickson, Secretary Development Services Division Department of Planning/Building/Public Works 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 - • SUBJECT: Determination of Non-Significance - ECF-097790 Haglund Rezone - May Creek, Tributary to - Lake Washington, King County, WDF SEPA Log No . 12520, ' I WRIA 08 . 0282 Dear Mr . Erickson: The Washington Department of Fisheries (WDF) has reviewed the above proposal and has the following comments . Maintaining habitat for natural populations of trout and salmon, ; 1 in urban areas of the Pacific Northwest has become challenging in recent years . Increasing rates and intensity of development, especially in the Puget Sound region, have adversely affected streams to the point where only remnant fish populations exist in many areas . Not only has structural habitat been lost through clearing of streamside vegetation, removal of instream debris and , ; rechanneling, but physical habitat features have been altered through improper stormwater management . Retaining habitat for these fish is not only important culturally to the northwest but is the mandate of WDF. May Creek is a salmon-bearing stream. Future development should be consistent with protection for fish and fish habitat, and the riparian vegetation necessary to healthy streams . Thank you for this opportunity to comment . If you have any questions regarding these comments please contact me at ( 206 ) 392-7190 . Sincerely, • Abo- H Gayle Kreitman Regional Habitat Manager gk • , i cc: WDF - Olympia 3 41116. VPWashington State Duane Berentson Department of Transportation Secretary of Transportation District 1 15325 S.E. 30th Place Bellevue, Washington 98007-6538 PLANNING DIVISION (206)562-4000 CITY OF RENTON DATE: October 16, 1990 OCT 1 7 1990 TO: Don Erickson, Chief, Current Planning 'RECEIVED Planning Division Public Works Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 FROM: JAMES L. LUTZ , P. E. , Utilities/Developer Engineer Washington State Department of Transportation District 1 15325 SE 30th Place, MS 113 Bellevue, WA 98007-6597 This letter is in response to the Determination of Non-Significance documents that we received from the City of Renton on October 15, 1990 . X We have reviewed the subject documents and have determined that the traffic generated by these developments will not have a significant adverse impact upon any state highways. File No. SR Hattivid ECF-097-90 405 vie,t4c i ECF-100-90 167 Please contact Robert Eichelsdoerfer of my Developer Services section at PHONE: 562-4297 , SCAN 638-4297 , if you have any questions. 4o ��_ CITY OF RENTON "LL t Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann, Administrator October 12, 1990 Carl Haglund 3308 S Judkins St Seattle,WA 98144 SUBJECT: Haglund Rezone ECF;R-097-90 Dear Mr. Haglund: This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee and Is to inform you that they have completed their review of the environmental impacts of the above-referenced project. The Committee, on October 10, 1990, decided that your project will be Issued a Determination of Non-Significance. Because there were no mitigation conditions, this Determination is final and may be appealed to the City's Hearing Examiner no later than 5:00 p.m., October 29, 1990. Any appeal must state clearly, in writing,why'I the Determination should be revised and must be accompanied by a nonrefundable $75.00 filing fee. To appeal this Declaration, you must file your appeal document with the hearing examiner within fourteen (14) days of the date the Declaration of Non-significance is final or the Declaration of Significance has been published in the official city newspaper. See City Code Section 4-6-23, RCW 43.21C.075 and WAC 197-11-, 680 for further details. There shall be only one appeal of a Declaration of Non-Significance or Declaration l of Significance, and if an appeal has already been filed, your appeal may be joined with the prior appeal for , hearing or may be dismissed if the other appeal has already been heard. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call Lenora Blauman or me at 235-, , 2550. e Environm al evie ommittee, • Donald K. Erickson,AICP I Secretary cc: Caryn Spain 3308 S Judkins St Seattle,WA 98144 ercdecsn/DKE/kac /fin Mill AvPn11P cnuth - Pentnn Wachinntnn QRf15S - Of1Al7tt-�SF.Q A,I , :>'`•:z----'ii : :: : : <>:s:: :...... URRENT --...NN:IN ...bI. .ISION............. ........... .......................... :. >::: F'r.T.DI1. IT T'•:..�...O : I� .R I CII::•II:50MhT; •': G::>>::::>`: a::::::::::: :i:::s::>:::::W on the 11� day of Q D6.4- , 19 clo , .1 deposited in the mails of the United States e sealed envelope containing clurx—k‘vgt e A .Vrwoat1il • . documents . This information was sent to: • . Name Representinci • T.....)-e_p-1--. car Ee.,01 oil • • ' Mr. Paul Reitenbach, Chief, Community Planning Mr. Gregory M. Bush, Metro • Department of Wildlife - Mr. Joe Robels, Department of Fisheries . Mr. James Lutz, Department of Transportation - • Ms. Connie Corpuz,•City of Seattle Duwamish Tribal Office • Muckleshoot Tribal Office - Charles C. Dietsch . Clarissa Fawcett J W H Chellson • Fryc Oldrich • James Evaold • . • • (Signature of Sender) 'a ,cam Subscribed lgi-nelln i 1n to me this /� dayof S-6., E'Zef 19 L/0 . ���GN,RET j A 4,� I ' aii".'.••�SsioNEi-• •. ,•••. //'' p `��/� .o A/••� • 'lam i -1,--7/. . c° NOTARY mil°:?� = No , Public in and for the cr) PusUc St= ' f Washington residing tG =i��• •ti g°' Oe* at ,•,# F�. 9, 1e..ta. 6SS th ein. .0° F'� WASH\ Os r i ...:::::::::::::::::::::i:::::::::•::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::•.::::::::::.:::::::::::::-..:,.......::.::...:•:.:.:.::...:.::.::::::::::.::::::::::::::.::=:-w:.ili :i : :•.:::•i:.:;ii:tiim:: :-.:,,.,:...uii•:::::::::::::::::::::::.:„.:.:.:.:.:.:.. . Pro:ject:: Name::.: : :. . . <::»:::D: , .:: •.:;::P:r.o:j::ect: N.umkier::::::;:: �lbCy: :.. b:<:::: :�;:;::: ::::. ::;:<:.».: `' '� CIT-Yf O F RENTO � Department of Planning/Building/Public Earl Clymer, Mayor Wor Lynn Guttmann, Administrater II October 12, 1990 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section Mail Stop PV-11 Olympia,WA 98504 SUBJECT: Environmental Determinations I Transmitted herewith are copies of Environmental Determinations and Environmental Checklists for thos projects reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee on October 10, 1990: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE HAGLUND REZONE ECF;R-097-90 Applicant seeks a non-project, programmatic rezone of an approximately 57,584`square foot parcel from R-1, Single-Family Residential Use, to B-1, Commercial Use. The proposed rezone is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. The parcel Is currently developed with a small business office In a residential-type structure which would remain on the site; no revision to the existing use or new development is presently being considered, however, as the building Is an older one, it is conceivable that redevelopment might take place in the foreseeable future. The project is located at 4016 Jones Avenue. The Determinations are final and may be appealed to the City's Hearing Examiner no later than 5:00 p.m.�'' on October 29, 1990. Any appeal must state clearly In writing why the Determination should be revised and must be accompanied by a non-refundable$75.00 filing fee. To appeal this Declaration, you must file your appeal document with the hearing examiner within fourteen (14) days of the date the Declaration of Non-significance is final or the Declaration of Significance has been published in the official city newspaper! See City Code Section 4-6-23, RCW 43.21C.075 and WAC 197-11-680 for further details. There shall be only one appeal of a Declaration of Non-Significance or Declaration of Significance, and if an appeal has already been filed, your appeal may be joined with the prior appeal for hearing or may be dismissed if the other appeal has already been heard. If you have questions, please call Lenora Blauman or me at 235-2550. For the Environmental Review Committee, (7: Y Donald K. Erickson, AICP Secretary cc: Mr. Paul Reitenbach, Chief, Community Planning Mr. Gregory M. Bush, Metro Department of Wildlife Mr.Joe Robels, Department of Fisheries Mr. James Lutz, Department of Transportation Ms. Connie Corpuz, City of Seattle Duwamish Tribal Office Muckleshoot Tribal Office agncyltr/DKE/kac 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2569 CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO.: ECF-097-90 APPLICATION NO(S): R-097-90 PROPONENT: Carl Haglund PROJECT NAME: Haglund Rezone DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Applicant seeks a non-project, programmatic rezone of an approximately 57,584 square foot parcel from R-1, Single-Family Residential Use, to I13-1, Commercial Use. The proposed rezone is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. The parcel is currently developed with a small business office in a residential-type structure which would remain on the site; no revision to the existing use or new development is presently being considered, however, as the building is an older one, it is conceivable that redevelopment might take place in the foreseeable future. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 4016 Jones Avenue 1 LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ' Development&Planning Section The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable signifipant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public upon request. There is no comment period for this Determination of Non-Significance. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee c/o Don Erickson, Secretary Development Services Division Department of Planning/Building/Public Works 200 Mill Avenue South Renton,WA 98055 You may appeal this determination in writing to Renton Hearing Examiner no later than 5:00 p.m., October 29, 1990. To appeal this Declaration, you must file your appeal document with the hearing examiner within fourteen (14) day,s of the date the Declaration of Non-Significance is final or the Declaration of Significance has been published in the official city newspaper. See City Code Section 4-6-23, RCW 43.21 C.075 and WAC 197-11-680 for further details. There shall be only one appeal of a Declaration of Non-Significance or Declaration of Significance, and if an appeal has already been filed, your appeal may be joined with the prior appeal for hearing or may be dismissed if the other appeal has already been heard. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact City of Renton, Community Development Department to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. PUBLICATION DATE: o A b€ - IS, 1990 DATE OF DECISION: Q: o� .,r 10) 19 1O SIGNATURES: - 2f e per- //-/d-?6 L yrf A' Guttmann,administrator DATE apartment of Planning/Building/Public Works /t5I Gr-4-1,-- F U. 18 c — , d J�S7 E. Webley, Administrator rf DATE o munity Service Departmerff /' ,`/©—P 9 er, ire ie - DATE Re ton Fire Department mitsig CITY OF RENTON OCT 2 2 1990 RECEIVED CITY CLERK'S OFFICE '74- 51067 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENT4L Kathleen Hoover ,being first duly sworn on oath states DETERMINATION ARMINAI REVIEW COMMITTEE that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Ccmmittee VALLEY DAILY NEWS (ERC) has issued a Determinationolloig o Non- Significance for the following roject(s)F • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition under the authority of the Renton ^unicipal Code. HAGLUND REZONE ECFDaily newspapers published six (6) times a week. That said newspapers Applicant seeks a non-project program- are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six matic rezone of an approximately 57,584 months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published square foot parcel from R-1, Singe-Family in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King Thheeid T Use, , Commer:wi Use. proposed rezone ol is consistent with the County, Washington. The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal City's Comprehensive Plan. The parcel is newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for currently developed with a small business King County. office in a residential-type structure which would remain on the site; no revision to the existing use or new development is present- The notice in the exact form attached, was published i tt}h,e Kent Edition ly being considered, however, as the build- ing tha XX , Renton Edition . XX , Auburn Edition X , (and not in redevelopmedntrmight take placeone, it iseiv inthle e fore- supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers seeable future. The project is located at during the below stated period. The annexed notice a Pub 1 i c N o t i.c e 4016 Jones Avenue. This Determination if FINAL.Any interest- ed party may appeal the above determine- (Environmental Determination) 4775 tion within fourteen(14)days of the determi- nation date. Written appeals will be accepted until 5:00 p.m. on October 29, was published on October 15 , 1990 . _ 1990. To appeal this Declaration, you must file your appeal document with the hearing examiner within fourteen (14) days of the date the Declaration of Non-signi'icance is The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the final or the Declaration of Significance has sum of$6 4 .9 4 been published in the official city newspa- per. See City Code Section 4-6-23, RCW 43.21C.075 and WAC 197-11-680 for further L/!�� details. Thion e shall on bSi onlye once appeal of a // 4 -%Cn/K,J/ Declaration of Non Significance cy Declara- tion of Significance, and if an appeal had already been filed, your appea may be joined with the prior appeal for hearing or 9 0 may be dismissed if the other appeal has Subscribed and sworn before me this 18 th day of Oct . 19 already been heard.Appeals should be spe- cific and shall set forth the reasons why the particular environmental determination should be reversed. Appeals shell be filed with the Renton Hearing Examiner, Munici- pal Building, 200 Mill Avenue South, Ren- ton,Washington 98055.All appeals must be accomplished by a non-refundable$75.00 filing filing fee. Notary Public for the State of Washingto Published in the Valley Daily News Octo- ber 15, 1990. 4775. residing at katrtrrn,,-4.54".._ King County, Washington VDN#87 Revised 4/89 -- II NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE II RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued •a Determination of Non-Significance for the following project(s) under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. HAGLUND REZONE ECF;R-097-90 Applicant seeks a non-project, programmatic rezone of an approximately 57,584 square foot parcel from R-1, Single-Family Residential Use, to B-1, Commercial Use. The proposed rezone is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. The parcel is currently developed with a small business office in a residential-type structure which would remain on the site; no revision to the existing use or new development is presently being I� considered, however, as the building is an older one, it is conceivable that redevelopment might take place in the foreseeable future. The project is located at 4016 Jones Avenue. This Determination a on is FINAL. Any interested party may appeal the above determination within fourteen (14)' j days of the determination date. Written appeals will be accepted until 5:00 p.m. on October 29, 1990. To appeal this Declaration, you must file your appeal document with the hearing examiner within fourteen (14) days of the date the Declaration of Non-significance is final or the Declaration of Significance has been published in the official city newspaper. See City Code Section 4-6-23, RCW 43.21C.075 and WAC 197-11 h •680 for further details. There shall be only one appeal of a.Declaration of Non-Significance or Declaration) of Significance, and if an appeal has already been filed, your appeal may be joined with the prior appeal fo tiI hearing or may be dismissed if the other appeal has already been heard. Appeals should be specific and shall set forth the reasons why the particular environmental determination should be reversed. Appeals shall be filed with the Renton Hearing Examiner, Municipal Building, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, Washington 98055. All appeals must be accompanied by a non-refundable$75.00 filing fee. ; Publication Date: October 15, 1990 Account No. 51067 I� I I pubnot i NOTIC8 ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION APPLICATION NO. ECF;R-097-90 HAGLUND REZONE . PROPOSED ACTION CARL HAGLUND APPLICANT SEEKS A NON-PROJECT, PROGRAMMATIC REZONE OF AN APPROXIMATELY 57,584 SQUARE FOOT PARCEL FROM R-1, SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USE, TO B-1, COMMERCIAL USE, THE PROPOSED REZONE IS CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THE PARCEL IS CURRENTLY DEVELOPED WITH A SMALL BUSINESS OFFICE IN A RESIDENTIAL- TYPE STRUCTURE WHICH WOULD REMAIN ON THE SITE; NO REVISION TO THE EXISTING USE OR NEW DEVELOPMENT IS PRESENTLY BEING CONSIDERED, HOWEVER, AS THE BUILDING IS AN OLDER ONE, IT IS CONCEIVABLE THAT REDEVELOPMENT MIGHT TAKE PLACE IN THE FORESEEABLE FUTURE. GENERAL LOCATION AND OR ADDRESS 4016 JONES AVENUE POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (E,R.C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DDOES ZDOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT DWILL (;g,WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. . THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., OCTOBER 29, 1990 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION CERTIFICATION NOTICE ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION APPLICATION NO. ECF;R-097-90 HAGLUND REZONE PROPOSED ACTION CARL HAGLUND APPLICANT SEEKS A NON-PROJECT, PROGRAMMATIC REZONE OF AN APPROXIMATELY 57,584 SQUARE FOOT PARCEL FROM R-1 , SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USE, TO B-1 , COMMERCIAL USE, THE PROPOSED REZONE IS CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THE PARCH IS CURRENTLY DEVELOPED WITH A SMALL BUSINESS OFFICE IN A RESIDENTIAL- TYPE STRUCTURE WHICH WOULD REMAIN ON THE SITE; NO REVISION TO THE EXISTING USE OR NEW DEVELOPMENT IS PRESENTLY BEING CONSIDERED, HOWEVER, AS THE BUILDING IS AN OLDER ONE, IT IS CONCEIVABLE THAT REDEVELOPMENT MIGHT TAKE PLACE IN THE FORESEEABLE FUTURE. GENERAL LOCATION AND OR ADDRESS 4016 JONES AVENUE POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE [ E.R.C. ] HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION ❑DOES NODES NOT OT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT DWILL C,WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. . THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. • COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., OCTOBER 29, 1990 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION envpstr • •.) ., . — ' . ?''"•••••••.:'••::::::::•::•:::::::::: .'66":4 '6 '''.i.4.*:!...•.7.....:....:•::::;4::::::;::::::::::•:::.;:::•:•:::•••••:::::::::::::.Tiiii:• ItivileSte0/p.p.g..:..i.......:::::::::.::::.:::::::mii.o....mimmx ....:,.. , : '' '' "''' '!':`..7:...'.:....'...'.....,........'.7.::... ..-.-:‘:7::.:':::::::::-.::-...........:.:t"':.;•••6'''...ii...1•J''''':6:..:43.....f::::K.:::::§.:.:1:::.1.111:::111111:...illibli....h11111.,,, .,....7.7'.:,;.:•7....:.,.........„....7.!...‘..:.'::::::::::::::::,:::::z: „.::::::: kfi::::oFoL4114qLN69.-4;imt.COMMITTEE. ...mi.loNg ..... .g:..iii:.ifim!...i:.. .iii ..„....-..i6iiiqmtNtiRnOts-i•.••••••• •i-isiti.giK.:::.W.•••::::4•:::. ... . .:.•a: :•k :•.1:::P:.:•: :::.: .:•. ...•••....:.:::. ...g.!:i:„i::?...::, •• f....:::::.•......*;::::::::::::::::::::::::: M::::: aM :M.::::EN.Y:.! .!. ::::::: ::.•git!ArgliEFe..yn.:::::::•....a.,...:u::.?.......:...:....:.:::: mos,........... ...m::........ .........:.....„....a ...m::: :::...i.m....:....:::::.: ••••• ••••••••-•••••••••-•-•,,:::.:-.....••••••••••••••.•:-••••••••••••••-••-•••••••••••••.:•••••,.::::•••••••••:•.:::•••:::::,••••:•:•••••':•••••• •••::••............:•••••••.:::::::••••::::••••••::::::•:•::::::-::::::::.:•:::::::•:::::::•.:::,::••::::::,:.::•.:::.:::::::::::::::::.::::::::.„...:,.:.::::.:.::::::::............ ...,,...::....::::.:::: ,:'-'''''.::::::::::';':•':'.i..:::::.::.:::•••:::':::::•:"-:•:::::........:.''.::.•••••••••••••••••••••:•••••••••:.:."'•••••••••••••••••••••:••••••••••••••••••••-••••••:.::•••••••••••;:••••••••::::•••••••••:•:::::•:::::,::::::::::•::::::::,..:::.:::::::::::•::::::::,...:.•••••:,.....:::::::::::.::::'.::.::::::::.::::::::::.::::::.::::::::::.:::::.::.::::::.:.:::......:.:::„...:,....:.:...........;;.:,,l.,,,....,.:. :::::.:*:::.:::: : ::;:::•....: ::: :a .2.,..:40:.:•:Y•,i1:990::::::. ; ::::::* :.:: :: :::::.::......:....:..:::::....:,.....,,..., '''''7..;::::.':'''.:::::'::::.:::::.:Ali'l.:1::::::.:::.:'1:::::.::::::::.:': a:.:.:.A......:!:',::',..'''':::::::.:::::i::::•1::.:::1;::::::.:::.:1:'::::::::i:..i: ::':::: :ii::'i!,,:!i:,:i1::0......'..0..,TH.....0.........:B....,.......E,......P..........,:::.:.....:::..:-...,: ...:;.':.::::.:.,::.:.:: :91.,::...,,.'i:,.......'1::';',,.,:';',...",,,•". -,:, ``," .• ' • ........:.....::::::::::.:::::...........::.,7 ..A:::::.:..-::''.::::.:*:':::::.':::::'..::-:..::::-::':..::::::::::•.:'..::::::•:::::::::-..:.::::::::::.:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::,....;.:•......;;;.....;•,,,,,,„1,,,,,z7x.,)„E.:gr. ,''....: ::''''. ... ... ::::',.'''.;: :::.''R''''' ''''''....' i?•: ::::::. ::,::::::::'....:,:.:.::.:'::::::::.::::.::::::::,;:,.'-';',',',4:.-ri,: ','V','§21,,,,.... . -4.- :••••••••••:.:.:::••:::::::::::.::,:':::.::,:::::,::.:::::::::::::::::::::„......:,........... ...'..s..:' ..••....:•••••:-:::::•:•:::::: ::.•:•:•::::::::::.:::••:::::::::::.:::::::::::•::::::::::::::::.:::::: ::::: :::::: :11b ::'::':''''':';':';:::.':%''''..*:::':'::'...:':':::::::''::::::::::::::::::':::::::::::::.::::.:.:::..:-:.::::•;::::::.:'::::.::::::::::.,:::::::::::::::::.:.:.:....,......:....ff, :",,,,'::.....::.:.::::::?::1:.::.:.:::::::::::::.:.%,:::.::::::•.:. ...,12...;,:::,;.,H,i..;:.x..: :ii'li„i::',,.,,,,,H...):.:nr.:,-;,:...1.,,.::. ...z.,,,•„1,-,;,,,,,,...,.,,..,,..,. , ::,::::::......::::'::::::?':::?::.:. a.'...:: :.:*...S.:* * ::: ::::::::: ::.::.: :::::'•;••• ••::.:•••:::::: ::.:: :?:,:::: ::: : :: ::::: ::,::: : '.''T.'-'"IT''"r'.4"'" ' . . . ,......... ................................:......::::,:::......:::::::::::::::: :::::=:•.::::::::::,::::: :::'4..:.:: :::: ::::::::::* :: :il.: ::?.:.iii:?:: : :::::: :*::?,:::,::::.::::: :: ::.::.:::**: : :::: U:::K :i::,:: ::.:':?...i:ii, •............:...?:.::::::::::::::::'..A..::;.'se..,''''''.:'..v.':::::rz::'::):1;::.::iiii:N ii:•';;: . .:':::::::•;i:Si.:". i:::0::::giai.M.:MM:::::::•Ma... ..:M.::::i.:: :t0: ::::ft.agii:di: in:A.:. .i::ii::::iii.::!:;: i.: : : ii:',.i;::i :::All , .........:A........:.;.:':.1:::..::::::::::15ANt'.i l'‘":".•''''''''''''''''':::'"..'...:•;.... ..;::-'''''':::::::::: ::::::a:':n: ::.::!::.:.::.:W:'.........::':.:::: ::::::?'.::.:::::::.,:.:•:...,:61:: :,..:::.':?;: ::::: :'..:„„:: : :::: ::.:'::: ::.:::::::.:::.:.:...:::::::: :::.:: ::... .....: :.. ..........m...:....?iii.. 1 . ':::''''''.........qH:: :: .'..:.':...i.:::::•:''::::: :•".......:Q::::::::M:.•:•::::::%%*.:::.W::::=nMMQ.'..C4.r.t.i.11P.9.1..91.::.j..::.:: :::..:U.::::::::::::::'=: ::: :M:im.,:...:•::•:::n::m..: :...:•.:. ....:::::....:.:.... ...i.i::•:. ....J.11.: , .:::::::::.::::::::.:::::::::.:..:::::::: ::::::L::: :::::::."6: AN 1:::.*'''TH: " . .." "":::.": : : ::: : " ... .:MM.::: ::**T...ai'l.. q:.'::WW.;:::::.•t:':'.:::ffs: M: :: :: ::::::.:::..: i .: :::: :: : ::: :.:,:.:•:'Si:::,.1....:.:.f.: .' :.:.:.'..a.......::'..;,'..;. ..:.'Zii, ''.....:::.....::::::::;•'....:.':::::: ::::k,+.0:11. ..!7,......, ::::.':'..s...;'''...::::;;:'..........:..0::g:''.:::1:::::::.::.:0:: :.:4i... .:::ft:::..:;:::: ::...:i'ai:.:. :.:.::::'1.-'''::.n.: izifie:::;:a:... ...::U..:::::...:M.:: :.W:.C::::.V::.:.:;:.:.s.:::•.:Y:;.::.;:::Hi:. *:::':M: :::Tiii. ' . :::::.:::..::::::.:?....M.:.;':::::.:::: :: :: :::::::::...M:':::•'::':...::z::.::::::::,::::::::::.:::::::.::::::::.:...:'..-•:...-:.....M::.: :::: :::. ::'::':::: t.ra,,,11..rt-I.r1.i...1.-.:m...........::: :::,:,.. .....m..............:?..:am:iw::::::::::::::m..........mi:: :::::::::::::::: ::: ::: :::.:::iii!i 1 ,:.:::::::''..:1'...:.;::: ::::',':-.:::.:::.: ::::: ::::: :::.:2-::':: ::.................:..:::::?::::::::::,,:in:H:::::: :: ::::a ...E.i.:•.a,:w....,.niA...t....ff...... ....7 :::::..... . ....,....:::.......::::.. omii:::::::m..... ........min...:..m .:......... ....:: :::::::::::::.::::::::,..,i, 1 'i:.'"::':::::......:1::.:::':::::.'';:i'[':P.I4O.J....E......C.T.'::a......:::::::::::::::k::::::.::1 .::::::::::::.:::::':..:::: ::: :•;:..,.,4g:.:I.M.:M.::::.:::::::':.:ii.:b6.: W. :': :::Mias:WM : ::: ::,:.:::::::::.::'::'::::::::=..s....:................:-.:::::::'..... ...:::,..::::....:. .M:;;::ii,. , .:..:i'::::::::::....:::'::::::::::::::::::::::::::::':::::.::::: ::::::::::'::::::'::::.:::::':: :::::::::::::::::;sfeti: :::::::::::ft:::::g.9.f.?:•::?:::::::?::::::: :::::::: :•:.:::.:2:.:':':::::::::: : :::b..... .:„......... .:.•]. . ......:::::::••••.......:.::::i. iiii:a.::103...pz..9.,.9.3 , ..... i.....:v6614.4d .::::,..:::: ::,.:....:::::........?........;.:gN).:(-1:. .:9: 1,..: :........: :...:?:...: :.... ......::::..........::::::::.....:......:.......:::::....;.. .... ... ...:: : ;......,.......::::::::;,„:: i..,i: go :NT...t............:........:::::„..:::....,.......:,:2-., .,r;:„..,,I.:::.,,a!:..0 .... .......*?„..,i;; . ii61telYit. :7::; .f;: „!C..11T.. ..i...... ...:.i' l-si....... edmrT)ff041.T, 58 s -:.•::.'''''..::::::::::::::.k.v.•......-,:,,R,F•la%;;,...,..•,:s7"..:,..:::',:'....:.:.........::.:.:....:•••:'..::::.:::::,:::::::::::,::::::::::; Q1::g........:,....P.P.,...... a se o 1 '....Residential,.y.......:.:::!-........-.............:::.::.:.:........... S t with:the?.QJtY.:•. d.: ..::::.:.:::::,:."?......M:::::::. •: -§::.•...::-.•::::::::::•::::::::::,:.:::::.•:-:::::•Mins:•:::: :::.::?.. . .*::::. :*: ::•::i::....:..I::;: iiiide.tF7..:,:•.:t::...,.,•.:,.;•,-.g .:Ai46:16.6.i.lsi§ P: .-:••••••• :;;. .iiffi.g .:::::::::1::-...::::::::t.: :: ::: :: : :.....;:. ...,. ....:.::::::::::::•.j.:::::::: %.:.........:::•; •.. ....::1:::.:.... ':.::''''''':::::::::'::•...:...•.:':...'1..:::.:'...:0*-2 ........ i.kg,i6i619.00YinYi::.;4. ..7.7:... .t.6.g..... ..! 4:.ii.601..V ! :5..1.1. ..7....:ii4:..i'li, 1 . se: ......' i.: f ::::: :;7.&::1: ::::::::.g: mfi.66j0.0:...x. Jy9!.....1...........::,:...::::.t3, ..........:,;:-:„.......,„...:..........,:....: ,-...:.......;:....;.......„. ...s..:..-.::: :.....-..c....::::.....-.:-.....:..--:,..??.. .. : Comprehensiveii..: .: iiiall....::10. §9P '......,...,.......,, ,....,...:.544.::: Itg.,.. pR......i developed s ''''''''.....:'::::::' 1.:::::.:.' s'''. . ' ...- . .' :.;•....-:::.:::i. ,:::,..,;.,hibh.....,w2p...........................:::?...................... " L type emain .....:" • :development...:::::,is :::: : ;ii::.:••••••:......:....:::••••••::•.:::-...•...-:::.. ..,-.......-'..• .•-•.:..•. • ..,....••..-:::::..::::...-...::-•••.......:•::::::::::'.......;.:•:...:2•••.......:•...':-...6tructureh:-. ..'-..... :: ::::iitf:v0W.:...:•,•:.: ...:::::•:•:building.•:::••;••••.,,i;: 1.:::'::•::::'...''.:::..../.:?:..::-.•• ••••:••••::::::-::::::::::::'.1::::•:......: •••:-.......-::•':::::.'....•:.::::::::::::::::.::•[..::::::•-:;.:.::•:::•h::::::::•:•'":•::2::: ::::.:•::: A....itilhe existing:.'... •:•:•:.. ::::::......:•:::7•••:s•:"..:••••••vd•r;:...as....bp...........,... ........ ...•.,,,, us ::::::?,.......:f..........::,....-...:::?..:....:'.:::-........:.•-:::::::::-...:. .:--....?...:;:.:.....:...,........'„?..-:-....-...-:::::.:::::::::.:.:•::::::.:::.. ..:......:: ::-..0:?. ::::;.?:: :::,........):::.....:::.:kiibelfi :....:.1 ..... i:14::::....thq1:::::Y. ....--...7.....;.....:::::::::::::::::::::::...........:::::a -::::::.4......:•::::::•:::,.. .. ..::::.....'.:::::::::....:::.:::•„ ......:: :::::•*;:.:::::::.:MtiRM..::...m.o.:::... .....0..1:5 .:-.....„.........,...:.,, il6: it ..*:. 9T. ..)..y..... ...1..i?.......;:......,.....:....:•.•;::.:..;.,:;.i...,,:;•.. .:.......w. ...:„.:..:...........:.::::.............::,........,, teviSic)''':::: . .•giiidbi-Oc.,::.4,.PYY...?..... :::::•.. a..:p.:.velbijmnti, .:::"...".: ".....:.;:::::"....:.:::: :::::::::1::*.**::::::::::::::::::::";::::2:M::: :2:•. 0:::: ::ft ::: : ::•40 .:PYP!:•Ii: -.81i'i:....ih#10?.0. .,..9P...9!... T.:-...t:7::::::::.............! !::::::::.::::::':-:: :::::::::......:,,i:,;.:::::1:, iiijoh ::... 0p..p.....,.....;.:::.::::............::::::.,:.: :.: ::::.:::::::::::::: ::..t...... ...... ... ....mmmE :2:::::::...............i........1,I ::::::•;;.:::::::;•:::::..:::::::::•:::::,...•:::::::::::::;••'::••::::::::::::::::::'::::::::: ::::::: ::::::•i:.::::: ::• , V0:::• ania.....................::::.•::::::::.:.:::::::::::•...... ..............:,:: ::::::::::: ::•:;•:::::: ::::::::: : -......::::......:.m.. ..::m ..::::m :•::0.:•.,::.-..:.. ...:::::::::•:.:::::::::::..::.::: .....::••••••;••:•••••::::::.:.::::•:•.h.::.::•::•:::•••„..:•.:•:::.::::: :::•?:.:::::•::.:: ::::*::::w..:?:: :::::::• :::::::•:::::•••••:::.::::::::•...-...........„......:).,-.......,.:,... ...*::::....:,:.;:::.::......::::.:::,:,,,,,,,,...;,..,....:.......:.....:::•....,...........:•.,.................:•...........:::.........:::::...................................:......„........„...........:.„...................,:cp 1 ::•>:•::::: ::::•:::::.....::::'•:::::::::::::•::.::::•.:::::::::::.:.:'.......:::*??:':::.:::•••••••••••:::::::••••••• ••••?•?..•:: ::::•Q:. :•.:,.:•.:"::*;:. 4.0):..$4.4.n.9.§.: N•1:: :!::'•.: 72.H:::::::.:'• . .1•••••••••••:::::•....,.....!..... ....;:i.......:::.............. ...A.::.:.............. ......... ..,:::,......:::::::s.siiiii, ...:.:,.::,•:::-.::::::::::::::.::,•:•••.,:•:••"_-:-.-.........:-.-::::::•:•„.:::::::::::••••.:,,,:•••••:0-":,\":1.:::::::•:::.:;::::::.:.:.:::::::::.::::;:::•,...::::.......................„......:•.•:-.•:•:•.....::: .•.............................,...::::::::„..„:„.... .,:::::::„........,:.....,..„....:...........„............:::::,...........:.....:,,::::„....,Ii• , ':..'...........:.........•••••••::::::.:.:....-........•:••••••.2••••:••••,<••••• .::::::;:::.:',...:.:::::::...i•p......: •.•01.7...00. ..,71.-...::::..:::::::::::::::::::::••••••••:•:.....:::::',,:.:•••••.•..,••:......:.-.,......./.......:.:::::•.:•:::::.::::........::::::•::::::.:::..:.:::::::::::•:.,::::::::.:::::::.:::::...........:::::;h:..„:::::.:...........:...:::•:.........„......::::..........„:..,......:..,.2. .:::.::.:::::::::•::::•.::.:::.....::.:::Lo:GA 1:1 ).p,!.•..0.....,:::!•::?:•1 :•:.••••••••:.,...:::::::::::::::::•••••••:•.--":•::::::::::. ...:,..:::.::::::min:...i.::: : :.-:,::.::::......;:,::.:,....6•••.:::::::.:::::::::..:::: ::.:::::::.-:::::..:.•::n::::•:•::::::::::::::::.::.:.•••:••.:.:..„......-,:-.........i...:.....:......:•:.;,.... :.:1:-•:::••••:•:•::-::•:::::'::::::.•::-..s.•••••.:::.:::„•••::::•••••:-.:••••••••:•:.•••••••••••::.;.::.:.::::::::::-::-: ::::::.::::.:?•im.: :::::::.... .. ::.:::::::.:: : :,:,.:.:...::...::::: ::•••: .......: ::::.::::::.::„......::::•?:•:•.:•••••:.....•:...•...:„...-.....-.........................„..,.....:....:..................:..,,....,„,:.....„IF ........:1••••::;•-•;••::.:•..::::....:..:::::::::::::.:::::.:.::::-::-:::•::::::.•••::.,::::::::•: .?.. :•:a.:• : ::::: :: : :::: :• •••,...;: ::?.....:.:•-.1....:::-......r.:::....::••••••-•.:•.••••,::::•:.:.......:......:::.....ii.::.....,:::......................:.;.::.:::.........,::.:4:::b.e.tor.n.3)r.! :.!...?.... ...!-..!::::Rli ,;'•,....:6.:.:.r:'•.-.:::....-,,::,...,,.. .....,:.,:::::•::::::: :::::.::.....:::::::::: ::....: ::::::: :::::::::.,...-..:-.:::::..:.:.......,...,..,.....:.....:....:::::...,: ::.'.'...:::.:::.:-.1iatER.Q.:1§.§:YF......:........:::.:::::. ::.:::::.......:h2....rojecte, 1.0.SY.!,,.: : ::::.k......:::::::::::::::::::::.:-............:.. ..... ..::.::::::.............................:.:',...........;.:::.:::::::.:::::..-.:::.Q......,.•.:::41......--: offimebd::.t.....-....•::::::::.--,.... ,.....;,,,...:-...,...:..n•-i-•6058ed.::::.:•-.171P.,:•:.:•P. ::-:::::::::::•.? . L.. ••••••••.•••,---...••......:•••••••••••:,::::::••••:•:,•:•:,,::.:.::.::...,::•_:.:.:::;•:::::,: .11:•-•:•••:•::•:R:•:::::::•::::::::".::•::: :::::::::.:::::::::::: • ••:••••••••••••••••::::::::: : :••••••:: : :;MM::.;.:: -.... ..:•••••••.::•::::.:::.::-?.. -...:::••••••••• :::•::::,iiaitite.::::?.............:,............:„.......:::„:..2...::.:....::::i.::::::.„:...... ....m.............:.:.....,:sh.,:.........................................::::.„. „ :::::::.::::i.6::.:.::".::::::.:::::::::::'::::%bkik.iitNIOAIJI:ON .:':;:::.p:::p.•::.: ::::::: :: ::::.g.N...00.:... ..1gr!!..::::::.:•::•.::•••.*:;i8•66 :;:::::.....w...0...Qm:::...:.....?....,:...:..................„.,.....„...:...:........ , . ..::•.::::''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''':.::::::}3::.:::•:::-..:.::....;:.::-.19..11::::1..................::::.:::::..:.:..::::::::1.•il:iiiii.."1.111::..,.......1.1:::::::•::...1::::.1.:....::....1::::::1':::...:...........::......•:::1::.:',..•.::.;:•:.:::::..:,1.!...:11!::::.:.;:.:....:.::......::::::....•:,:::::•:::::::::,....*:.....:1..1.:1'..:1,:i.j!,...:::i:l...1......i....1:::::::::....:::.......1.....•i::.1;:..... .::..1.•11:11.:!.13......_.....i'....:6:_::,.0.....:...t.:_...:_:;:fti......,:___:.°:...._t:... ._.........1:P. 1 ,, ::".1:,:,•::::_...,,r:.::•:::::::::::.:.:::::............ , . /. -- / , . ••.) L _---. , / / . / -el 1. . 74, I • I_ ' • > . , / • 1 _- • • ..---- A 3 • 'i- _— ---— . v\ . ,. :._., . 5 • 7:0 .?.‘ ,)' . • --'C''' . 1 • C...., — : L" I. ---/ ' . t/ _ _ • • , s,----\ •-------. . ' .5\ [ ,-,,. f.___) n .............- • .1 q;,1) •‘-.:5'; 6_,9\-]i ,, „.: / ? 0..41;•1.',. 1 .i",i3. '.,,'. i — ii‘,---,s, ‘2711-] .1' / _ J, I,.-. vs, .., --. ..i..L..,-:..,,,i...,,,..,71 i , - „It= _,.„.., -1 -, ., , ss . _ ..____. c., „ - -.. _. 11 ._ - ''''' I ze A,.. . ---I*7- I .,., A.- 7 \ ' c.,•• .1. iA , • - --' ' -."5 1. . - • f - I , t :,.,,,,,, ,.., s ..\R,_.. _ ____ ,, • -,...N1 ,s..; _ 1 • . -, . -.. & • i...... _IT..1 _. ;I:c.'.••1 :-:, • T.I .' .1'• V , . 1 • t) , • ' Environmental Review Comr____=_9 Staff Report Haglund Rezone October 10, 1990 Page 2 • • Staff recommend that ERC issue a Determination of Non-Significance for the proposed non-project, programmatic rezone. Note #1: There is no present intent to redevelop the property. The applicant will be notified, however, that at the public hearing for reclassification, staff will,recommend that: a) landscaping be provided, according . to Landscaping Code requirements, to screen the subject property from the abutting residential development, prior to the recording of the rezone; b) all present use of the property will be required to conform to use regulations established in the Zoning 'Ordinance for the Commercial zone; and c) environmental review and land use review are to be undertaken for any,application submitted for remodeling or for new development on this site. • LAND USE 1. • Whether the proposed rezone is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and related land use regulations/guidelines? The applicant seeks a rezone of the subject property to comply with the Commercial designation established for this property in the Comprehensive Plan. The requested rezone will also serve to convert the existing small business office development on the site from a non-conforming use to a conforming use. The development is generally compatible (e.g., type of use, size of structure, project design) with neighboring residential developments and nearby commercial uses. The existing development is generally consistent with development standards established in the Zoning Ordinance for business uses (4-31-10). Code requirements are not achieved under the Parking and Loading Ordinance (4- 14) or the Landscaping Ordinance (4-31-34). Staff will prepare an evaluation for public hearing of the rezone including a study of conformance of the proposed action with the four reclassification criteria -- e.g., consistency with the Comprehensive Plan, compatibility with vicinity uses, availability of public improvements, and timeliness of the action. Conformity to at least one of those criteria, together with the absence of contraindication in any of the other categories,.is required for the support of a rezone action. The Zoning Ordinance requires site plan approval (4-31-33) for any substantial remodeling of an existing use or for any new development in the Commercial Zone; this regulation would be applied in the event that any renovation or change is proposed for the existing development. In addition, at the time of site plan review, any proposed project will be required to conform to all land use regulations (e.g., Environmental Review Ordinance, Commercial Development, Parking and Loading, Landscaping Ordinance, Building Code, Fire Code). Particular attention may need to be directed to protection of the adjacent residential structures in conjunction with any modifications to the site. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Whether environmental impacts are anticipated in conjunction with the proposed non-, project, programmatic rezone? No environmental impacts are identified as being likely to occur in conjunction with the proposed rezone. The property is fully developed at this time and no plans are presented for reconstruction V or new development. • SEPA and the City's Environmental Review Ordinance.mandate environmental review in the event • that any significant remodeling or new construction is undertaken on the property. At the time of that review, areas of particular interest are likely to include the following: aesthetics, land use, transportation, public services and utilities. While there are likely to be some impacts in all of those areas, there is no evidence to indicate that customary mitigation measures would be insufficient to address the anticipated impacts. • • , Environmental Review Comn ;Staff Report Haglund Rezone October 10, 1990 • Page 3 . LAND USE Construction Field Services: Approved with condition that total site is brought into compliance to City code. Development Planning: Consider including adjacent 'R-1 lot in with this rezone. Driveways appear excessive. Code requires 10' landscape strip along public roads and 15' wide landscape strip along residential boundary. Fire Prevention Bureau: Any new construction or development must comply with current Building & Fire Codes at time of construction or development. Long Range Planning: . Approved subject to meeting all the City's requirements. Parks and Recreation: No impacts at this time. Police Department: Approved. • Sewer Utilities: Project is approved for rezone only. Utility Plan Review reserves the right to comment on site approval. Storm Water: Project is approved for rezone only. Utility Plan Review reserves the right to comment on site approval. Transportation: No noted transportation related problems. Water Utilities: Project is approved for Rezone Only. Utility Plan Review reserves the right to comment on Site approval. ENVIRONMENTAL Construction Field Services: Rezone of property is need to bring into compliance. • • Illegal fill was placed on site (court action taken). They • should be applying for required permits and approval. Development Planning: Probable minor impact. . Fire Prevention Bureau: Probable minor impact. Long Range Planning: The subject site is designated as commercial in the City's Comprehensive Plan. The property is surrounded by commercial uses. The site is very close to the freeway and it is affected by the freeway noise. The proposed zone is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.. • Parks and Recreation: No impacts at this time. Police Department: No impact on police services. Sewer Utilities: Site does not lie in Sanitary Sewer Mort. Site lies in May Creek Sanitary Sewer Basin- Honey Creek Sub Basin. Storm Water: Site lies in Gypsy Creek Drainage Collection Basin. Transportation: No transportation problems noted. Water Utilities: Project is not impacted by APA. 7 .... ........ ........... City of Renton Environmental Review Committee MEETING NOTICE October 10, 1990 To: Lynn Guttmann, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator John Webley, Community Services Administrator Lee Wheeler, Fire Chief From: on Erickson, Secretary Meeting Date: October 10, 1990. Time: 10:00 AM Location: Third Floor Conference Room Agenda attached below. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA OCTOBER 10, 1990 Third Floor Conference Room Commencing at 10:00 AM TIME/KEY PARTICIPANTS NEW VMC OFFICE ADDITION ECF;SA-100-90 The applicant seeks site plan approval to construct two story office addition to provide conference rooms. The project is located at 400 South 43rd Street. HAGLUND REZONE ECF;R-097-90 Applicant seeks a non-project, programmatic rezone of an approximately 57,584 square foot parcel from R-1, Single-Family Residential Use, to B-1, Commercial Use. The parcel is currently developed with a small business office in a residential-type structure which would remain on the site; no revision to the existing use or new development is presently being considered, however, as the building is an older one, it is conceivable that redevelopment might take place in the foreseeable future. The project is located at 4016 Jones Avenue. cc: J. Covington, Executive Assistant to the Mayor L. Warren, City Attorney F. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner G. Gordon, Fire Marshal • . •---... • ... r ..........: . . ..,.. ... ___ . ... . :::::.i;::.:,P::::.;i:]i•:::::::i:':-:: :. ;i:liEPARTMENT OF pLANNING/Ei.UILDING/P.P.O.L....1C....:...#.pjqi:::Aliiiig:::1:::.:Ingilli :'::.....,•.i:::::.;,.i:................................................................:.... . • '''' TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE , ... STAFF.REPORT ...'.i• ..•••••• :..::.•:...:.:..,........::.:: . .:•.• •:•,•:.:: -,..:...... ..• . .. ,:.,..:".••::: :••:.;] ii.:i.;,, ..:::•••:.:: :.),...::.,:.:..:::],.:,.::::::.•:•:•i..:::.i]i: :.. ." :.:,:..:.:::.:i.::. ,:m.:mma;:m::•:im...,....t....i...:.:.....: .::::..::•:::A::i:;::::::.::::.:.::.::,::::::.::: .::::::••••. .:.:::,..••.•.., .....• . .• • , .. .::.....:,:.::::.::::::::: :::„.:,....:. ••:: ...,•:::.•::::::-•::.::: •..:::....:::•:.:.::...:•.:i..i:::::,.,...:i:::::,:i: :,...:::•::•:::.::•:::::::•::::•:::•:::::::i:•:.:i:.:::::::.g:. BER 1990 ..:-.. ::M::-;:.•:.".::::: ::i:::.:.•:.:.:::::....::................:............. .. ... ........:.:.....i:.........::•::........::................................................................... . , . •••••:Ai: :.:::[:...13-.AO:KO-Ot•psuND: .........„...:••••••:.....:.::.,.......:•....:,......„. •:.:::•:...•:.:•:.:••:iAP..PLIcANT: Carl Haglund .:=•:::•-::::.. - •• Haglund Rezone .:..:i: •: .:1•...i::::11:::.P.noigeT.;•ii . .• • • .. • . ..••.:•.:.•:;•.::.::•:ii:•::•::•:: .•:::::.::•.:::i::.::.:::.::.:::.::.::.::.::.:::.:.:.,.• . :•:::-;•,..:.•:: .....,..:..;::;,:.:.:...11::::.:,..;•...:. ]:::.:::mmmima.i .g .. ... ..............,...,..:...„-• •:. ,-... ..,.. .... .. E lSIVIRONMENTAI.:.CHCKi..lST; ..:• .:i." •.EC..,R; R...0.‘,9,:.7 9...:9.i.. ii::::::::. .........::....iii:j:1:::,:::•::.::!.,'..:i..:;.,,.::.:i.iiiiii:::::..iii.::...]......0::.: :.i::!....i....::::!•:.!.:.:!....!!..]:•:;]!•:.:!•:,!:ifi...iiirl DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL '• --..: Applicant seeks anOn-ProjeCt;'PrpbTmTrp :...:„.......1 .. • " • • ---'::-..:-..,:. •• •• •-• ' - • .. an approximately:-.57,584 stiOat: .:...1.004:1::.1.:0..r:Ps,p1:1:::f1::!:r.....:'....:.F.':i.::t:.1..::.:;,1 ... ..:... • . • ' •. • • . • • •Single Family Residential 118-6.; ta..B..:-1?.:cPp...:rn.:.. ..rP..11-.Y..:!...p:....:t .•...,..:. ...:..:.:::.•,.....:.•-• . ... •:.::::: .....: ..,..,:.,...,....... ... The parcel is currently develOped4ith:p!io.m...01.-,:Oppp.:..§:.i. ...:.:..: . ...- •.• :. office in a residential type structure.whiebyiidbfd:::.rernafq. .. . , . ....: • . : . on the site;. no revision to the existifiRs:::-1.! g::-,.:pr. Tys4 development is presently being considered,....:.bbw....:..e...y..:r...i:::ali the building is an ,older..:One•,.:...fti,Jk!pp.:.op.:,01yo..,pi!.p,zr1::p1 • .. ... ... redevelopment ,Might talc..e.::.plabe:::....:fr.....!.:.:';:jbp.::::i:1.fpf.'::e$ee.t.....sa0!P...:: .: . . . •-. ••futute..:..:1...:.:-:........:...,...'.:....:h.::::::: i•-•:*.E. ::::,...'.::::E:4::.::a.: .! ii:.:•::i:i: :::::::.::.:a.::.:•:.:::::: : :]*.::•:...:.: - .,..::,.,..... .....,:::..,:....:.........i.:.:........:.:...... ..... . . . . ..,....;,,,.....,.:...„......„.,......,....... . LOCATION OF PROPOSAL : - 4016--:...- Jp....00...iyotio*:..:..;-:.•::•:. ::.:..:..•::::::......-.:..:,..::::::„....::.....:i.::.:]::.i,.:::::.,.....,:.........::::::„.:, :.::::::.i..g.„.•::„.•:„„.„,,:„::.. .:•„.:,,,.,:: ,,, ::::.::.::•:•:•:•-•:•••::•:•:•:•......-...••••••••••••••••••••—• • • • ..ir, ,. : rd It. 1 ,. —114 2 1------: ' ei 1 ? 1 - , 1.._,......_.-_-__i._..,___ I . __...i I• i - , — %__ -4 i 3,: • . t 9 i' j S 1 PI '' ? . ' ..,—,, C . . -\ •- . 1 'r • --...-1 25•1 fi D . = .. ___ . .0 F r 7 -- ..: ••, _____$_ . ,ctF. [k ' il gi:'.g..--.... Y i R ______.. ri ' i- v in. f.-----•- -I- - - -I gl .x --_- • -fIX9' 1 ,‘• -- -----i--1-- -- - -----! ___________ .14 t , f . i. • Technical Advisory Committ&e,staff Report Haglund Rezone October 5, 1990 Page 2 LAND USE 1. Whether the proposed rezone is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and related land use regulations/guidelines? The applicant seeks a rezone of the subject property to comply with the Commercial designation established for this property in the Comprehensive Plan. The requested rezone will also serve to convert the existing small business office development on the site from a non-conforming use to a conforming use. The development is generally compatible (e.g., type of use, size of structure, project design) with neighboring residential developments,and nearby commercial uses. The existing development is generally consistent with development standards established in the Zoning Ordinance for business uses (4-31-10). Code requirements are not achieved under the Parking and Loading Ordinance (4- 14) or the Landscaping Ordinance (4-31-34). The Zoning Ordinance requires site plan approval (4-31-33) for any substantial remodeling of an existing use or for any new development in the Commercial Zone;this regulation would be applied in the event that any renovation is proposed for the existing development. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Whether environmental impacts are anticipated in conjunction with the proposed non- project, programmatic rezone? No environmental impacts are identified as being likely to occur in conjunction with the proposed • rezone. The property is fully developed at this time and no plans are presented for reconstruction or new development. SEPA and the City's Environmental Review Ordinance mandate environmental review in the event that any significant remodeling or new construction is undertaken on the property. At the time of that review, areas of particular interest are likely to include the following: aesthetics, land use, transportation, public services and utilities. While there are likely to be some impacts in all of those areas,there is no evidence to indicate that customary mitigation measures would be insufficient to address the anticipated impacts. Note#1: Staff will prepare an evaluation for public hearing of the rezone including a study of conformance of the proposed action with the four reclassification criteria -- e.g., consistency with the Comprehensive Plan, compatibility with vicinity uses, availability of public improvements; and timeliness of the action. Conformity to at least one of those criteria,together with the absence of contraindication in any of the other categories is required for the support of a rezone action. There is no present intent to redevelop the property. The applicant will be notified, however, that in the event that the rezone is approved, City and State regulations will mandate that the applicant bring the • existing development into conformance with all City regulations (e.g., the Landscaping Ordinance, UBC, UFC) prior to recording the rezone, and that all use of the property will be required to conform to regulations established in the Zoning Ordinance for the Commercial zone. The applicant will also be notified that environmental review and land use review are to be undertaken for any application is submitted for significant remodeling or for new development on this site. For example, 11 the Zoning Ordinance requires site plan approval (4-31-33) for any substantial remodeling of an existing use or for any new development in the Commercial Zone. At the time of site plan review, a proposed project will be required to conform to all land use regulations (e.g., Site Plan Review Criteria, Environmental Review Ordinance, Commercial Development, Parking and Loading, Landscaping Ordinance, Building Code, Fire Code). Particular attention may need to be directed to protection of the residential structures in conjunction with any modifications to the site, through the creation of development on this site which is thematically integrated in terms of design and use. • Technical Advisory Commiti'ce'Staff Report • - Haglund Rezone October 5, 1990 Page 3 >D< >> : : MME: T. � F REVIEWI; '' PAF THE...T `< <> >� >> < < << < > ' > > > �� >> ' CO�. NTS.O :. tE11�/ �1G DE A M N S .:::.:::::.:::.:::... iiiiii iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii .::.:...;: ::<::::Va�loue:Cty.depar�r�en.s.ha.e.re.:re.....e�.and.comtnen.ed.gpon..he..#arolec.��These.�c�m:..:e.:..s:a...e::: LAND USE Construction Field Services: Approved with condition that total site is brought into compliance to City code. Development Planning: Consider including adjacent R-1 lot in with this rezone. Driveways appear excessive. Code requires 10' landscape strip along public roads and 15' wide , landscape strip along residential boundary. Fire Prevention Bureau: Any new construction or development must comply with current Buidling & Fire Codes at time of construction or development. Long Range Planning: Approved subject to meeting all the City's requirements. Parks and Recreation: No impacts at this time. Police Department: Approved. Sewer Utilities: Project is approved for rezone only. Utility Plan Review reserves the right to comment on site approval. Storm Water: Project is approved for rezone only. Utility Plan Review reserves the right to comment on site approval. Transportation: No noted transportation related problems. Water Utilities: Project is approved for Rezone Only. Utility Plan Review reserves the right to comment on Site approval. ENVIRONMENTAL Construction Field Services: Rezone of property is need to bring into compliance. Illegal fill was placed on site (court action taken). They should be applying for required permits and approval. Development Planning: Probable minor impact. Fire Prevention Bureau: Probable minor impact. Long Range Planning: The subject site is designated as commercial in the City's Comprehensive Plan. The property is surrounded by commercial uses. The site is very close to the freeway and it is affected by the freeway noise. The proposed zone is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Parks and Recreation: No impacts at this time. Police Department: No impact on police services. Sewer Utilities: Site does not lie in Sanitary Sewer Mort. Site lies in May Creek Sanitary Sewer Basin-Honey Creek Sub Basin. Storm Water: Site lies in Gypsy Creek Drainage Collection Basin. , • Transportation: No transportation problems noted. Water Utilities: Project is not impacted by APA. City of Renton Technical Advisory Committee MEETING NOTICE October 5, 1990 To: Gregg Zimmerman Rubin Yu Glen Gordon Sam Chastain Penny Bryant Jim Hanson From: on Erickson, Chairman Meeting Date: October 5, 1990 Time: 8:30 AM Location: Third Floor Conference Room Agenda is listed below. TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA OCTOBER 5, 1990 Third Floor Conference Room Commencing at 8:30 AM TIME/KEY PARTICIPANTS NEW PROJECTS VMC OFFICE ADDITION ECF;SA-100-90 The applicant seeks site plan approval to construct a two story office addition. The project is located at 400 South 43rd Street. HAGLUND REZONE ECF;R-097-90 Applicant seeks a non-project, programmatic rezone of an approximately 57,584 square foot parcel from R-1, Single-Family Residential Use, to B-1, Commercial Use. The parcel is currently developed with a small business office in a residential-type structure which would remain on the site; no revision to the existing use or new development is presently being considered, however, as the building is an older one, it is conceivable that redevelopment might take place in the foreseeable future. The project is located at 4016 Jones Avenue. Village Place North ECF;SA;CU;V-078-90 Applicant seeks: 1) a conditional use permit for development of a new ten-story (95 foot) office/retail sales building; 2) site plan approval for renovation (including partial demolition) of an existing retail center on the subject property and for renovation of service areas (e.g., landscaping, ingress/egress routes, parking); and 3) a variance for the construction of a new private roadway to serve the development. The project is located at Renton Village Center/South Grady Way. M NOTICE OF PROPOSED REZONE RENTON, WASHINGTON A Rezone Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the Department of Planning/Building/Public Works. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals: 1 I DESCRIPTION: HAGLUND REZONE ECF;R-097-90 Applicant seeks a nonproject programmatic rezone of an approximately 57,584 sf parcel from R-1, Single-Family Residential Use to B-1, Commercial Use. The parcel is currently developed with a small business office. No revision to the existing use or new development is presently being'considered. Rezone would result in a nonconforming use becoming a conforming use. Any change to the use would require site plan approval under the Zoning ordinance. . GENERAL LOCATION: 4016 Jones Ave I PUBLIC APPROVALS: 1 Environmental Review Land Use Approval Building Permit The application can be reviewed at the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to Public Hearings or during Public Hearings. For 1 .. " further information on the application_or dates of final action by the City, please contact the Development 1 • Services Division at 235-2550. Please reference the project application number when calling. n�4f4sir x , iA 0-k s ,__, i _p i , .; , , I . --- \-F-- 4 -- , .., ,,z-,--, , . . T 1 a,_ t . y 1 r Jr ' . -, i,v. r ., c 4 1 __I rL1J.._62 0 t i 09 mii i — - -- -- - ---- J s i ec DEPARTIV:L I IT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/P6di-IC L4p ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET liek, 1 eitk 0 c� REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: �^ •�l ����`�C�p� DATE CIRCULATED: 8/30/90 COMMENTS DUE: 9/ 1f 'Q/rsN itcp EFC-097-90 c, �� s APPLICATION NO(S): R-097-90 4 Z4,PROPONENT: Carl Haglund ,90 9 PROJECT TITLE: Haglund Rezone BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks a nonproject programmatic rezone of an approximately 57,584 sf parcel from R-1, Single-Family Residential Use to B-1, Commercial Use. The parcel is currently developed with a Small business office. No revision to the existing use or new development is presently being considered. Rezone would resat in a nonconforming use becoming a conforming use. Any change to the use would require site plan approval under the Zoning ordinance. LOCATION: 4016 Jones Ave SITE AREA: 51,584 sf BUILDING AREA (gross): 1200 sf IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATI IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air 3. Water 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy&Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land &Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light&Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic&Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities _ I COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. (//e, Signature of Director or Authorized Representat' e / Date Rev. 6/88 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-097-90 APPLICATION NO(S).: R-097-90 PROPONENT: Carl Haglund PROJECT TITLE: Haglund Rezone BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks a nonproject programmatic rezone of an approximately 57,584 sf parcel from R-1, Single-Family Residential Use to 5-1, Commercial Use. The parcel is currently developed with a small business office. No revision to the existing use or new development is presently being considered. Rezone would result in a nonconforming use becoming a conforming use. Any change to the use would require site plan approval under the Zoning ordinance. LOCATION: 4016 Jones Ave TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAG DATE: 9/21/90 ENGINEERING DIVISION- TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION CURRENT PLANNING LONG RANGE PLANNING PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON SEPTEMBER 13, 1990. REVIEWIN DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: 71;:a.4-...05>A0 27.--XLA7L7oy SlS�`-�t--�5 APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED /�/G may,G?T_[_, �'v i/ DATE: "5.7 ` ' 7 /7 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED RE RESENTATIVE REV. 5/90 , DEPARTNL. T OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PI. IC WORKS ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: DATE CIRCULATED: 8/30/90 COMMENTS DUE: 9/13/90 EFC 097-90 PLANNING two OITY OF RENTON APPLICATION NO(S): R-097-90 AUG .3-.1 1990 PROPONENT: Carl Haglund RECEIyED PROJECT TITLE: Haglund Rezone BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks a nonproject programmatic rezone of an approximately 57,5S4 sf parcel from R-1, Single-Family Residential Use to B-1, Commercial Use. The parcel is currently developed with a small business office. No revision to the existing use or new development is presently being considered. Rezone would result in a nonconforming use becoming a conforming use. Any change to the use would require site plan approval under the Zoning ordinance. LOCATION: 4016 Jones Ave SITE AREA: 51,584 sf BUILDING AREA (gross): 1200 sf IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY, 1. Earth 2. Air 3. Water 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy&Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land &Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light&Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic&Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities COMMENTS: /, We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of prob impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Au orized,Representative Date Rev. /88 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-097-90 APPLICATION NO(S).: R-097-90 PROPONENT: Carl Haglund PROJECT TITLE: Haglund Rezone BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: - Applicant seeks a nonproject programmatic rezone of an approximately 57,584 sf parcel from R-1, Single-Family Residential Use to B-1, Commercial Use. The parcel is currently developed with a small business office. No revision to the existing use or new development is presently being considered. Rezone would result in a nonconforming use becoming a conforming use. Any change to the use would require site plan approval under the Zoning ordinance. LOCATION: 4016 Jones Ave TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 9/21/90 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: ; . UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION CURRENT PLANNING LONG RANGE PLANNING PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON SEPTEMBER 13, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: rack% evc' P�.Y dY1 h-APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED DATE: SIGNATURE 0 IRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 5/90 DEPARTIVILI4T OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PL,-..'JC WORKS ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET c►rya�FQr,orv, /oV ��-- ��P � "trl ry REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 'TiY-- �'e-�111�'l /996 DATE CIRCULATED: 8/30/90 COMMENTS DUE: 9/'I 3/90 � RENTON FIRE DEFT. EFC-097-90 , FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU , APPLICATION NO(S): R-097-90 J 1990 AUG `' PROPONENT: Carl Haglund PROJECT TITLE: Haglund Rezone ° " 1 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks a nonproject programmatic rezone of an approximately 57,584 sf parcel from R-1, Single-Family Residential Use to B-1, Commercial Use. The parcel is currently developed with a small business office. No revision to the existing use or new development is presently being considered. Rezone would result in a nonconforming use becoming a conforming use. Any change to the use would require site plan approval under, the Zoning ordinance. LOCATION: 4016 Jones Ave SITE AREA: 51,584 sf BUILDING AREA (gross): 1200 sf IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air 3. Water 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy& Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land &Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light&Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic&Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. ael7 .fe'/ /9 9.4 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date I Rev. 6/88 • I • DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-097-90 APPLICATION NO(S).: R-097-90 PROPONENT: Carl Haglund PROJECT TITLE: Haglund Rezone BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks a nonproject programmatic rezone of an approximately 57,584 sf parcel from R-1, Single-Family Residential Use to B-1, Commercial Use. The parcel is currently developed with a small business office. No revision to the existing use or new development is presently being considered. Rezone would result in a nonconforming use becoming a conforming use. Any change to the use would require site plan approval under the Zoning ordinance. LOCATION: 4016 Jones Ave TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 9/21/90 ENGINEERING DIVISION ' TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION CURRENT PLANNING LONG RANGE PLANNING PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON SEPTEMBER 13, 1990. II • 'cuev�-ll. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISI��ON://��"�ll(�- � APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED .11-cL ;� �- eezeiz ate_,-n%4- .7/ — c Yet, y • • DATE: Lice e)j/9/ CJ SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE (/ REV. 5/90 � . DEPARTII;l��JT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PL;JC WORKS PLANo s biv R�jy�,ONN ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET14118 3 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: C y\ .c-tc n I L4-4 at® DATE CIRCULATED: 8/30/90 COMMENTS DUE: 9/13/90 EFC-097-90 CITY OF RENTON RECEIVED APPLICATION NO(S): R-097-90 AUG 3 0 1990 PROPONENT: Carl Haglund 611ILDING DIVISION PROJECT TITLE: Haglund Rezone BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks a nonproject programmatic rezone of an approximately 57,584 sf parcel from R-1, Single-Family Residential Use to B-1, Commercial Use. The parcel is currently developed with a small business office. No revision to the existing use or new development is presently being considered. Rezone would result in a nonconforming use becoming a conforming use. Any change to the use would require site plan approval under the Zoning ordinance. LOCATION: 4016 Jones Ave SITE AREA: 51,584 sf BUILDING AREA (gross): 1200 sf IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air 3. Water 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy&Natural Resources I 7. Environmental Health 8. Land &Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light&Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic&Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities COMMENTS: a z O - 1?-4 ,,f , De—eV .4 //ON t pJ g /„ells -� a,„,(' GU p Lfd or,/ g e-c a" 7® 1 1,O rig-iee403 Vey 440 We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. t I Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Rev. /88 • DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-097-90 APPLICATION NO(S).: R-097-90 PROPONENT: Carl Haglund PROJECT TITLE: Haglund Rezone BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks a nonproject programmatic rezone of an approximately 57,584 sf parcel from R-1, Single-Family Residential Use to B-1, Commercial Use. The parcel is currently developed with a small business office. No revision to the existing use or new development is presently being considered. Rezone would result in a nonconforming use becoming a conforming use. Any change to the use would require site plan approval under the Zoning ordinance. LOCATION: 4016 Jones Ave TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 9/21/90 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMU TY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION CURRENT PLANNING LONG RANGE PLANNING PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. ' PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON SEPTEMBER 13, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: CAPs c t0/1 �(L APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED Trii 70#-0 S s ter / Am) fa /44 DATE: SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 5/90 r _ s_ l DEPARTML NT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PL,AC WORKS ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: '"OLOCIOttinent ' O ' , I DATE CIRCULATED: 8/30/90 COMMENTS DUE: 9/13/ Wpwm EFC-097-90 EAtro ' APPLICATION NO(S): R-097-90 ;, EP , Y :7/4. PROPONENT: Carl Haglund 7 PROJECT TITLE: Haglund Rezone BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks a nonproject programmatic rezone of an approximately 57,584 sf parcel from R-1, Single-Family Residential Use to B-1, Commercial Use. The parcel is currently developed with a small business office. No revision to the existing use or new development is presently being considered. Rezone would result in a nonconforming use becoming a conforming use. Any change to the use would require site plan approval unded the Zoning ordinance. LOCATION: 4016 Jones Ave SITE AREA: 51,584 sf BUILDING AREA (gross): 1200 sf IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air • 3. Water 4. Plants v 5. Animals 6. Energy& Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land &Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light&Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic&Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities i COMMENTS: i We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identiified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. 917WiL / Signature of Director or Au ized Representative Date Rev. /88 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-097-90 APPLICATION NO(S).: R-097-90 PROPONENT: Carl Haglund PROJECT TITLE: Haglund Rezone BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks a nonproject programmatic rezone of an approximately 57,584 sf parcel from R-1, Single-Family Residential Use to B-1, Commercial Use. The parcel is currently developed with .a small business office. No revision to the existing use or new development is presently being considered. Rezone would result in a nonconforming use becoming a conforming use. Any change to the use would require site plan approval under the Zoning ordinance. LOCATION: 4016 Jones Ave TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 9/21/90 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION CURRENT PLANNING LONG RANGE PLANNING PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON SEPTEMBER 13, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: IJvTe t APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED 6045/%' ,n c/0447 ad/'mac,/ !Z - / Ga z ie7 At/ '13-47id z'4, `pis rle , Ge,G if Code /O Ga 4-0/4e- f1,—,ij" a/On J nN44`i /v,QZ. a/a //9 w.��,� tow06G�r�c- sGr,� 0/4i`l7, bou/t /17 97//er// DATE: 74)- ee' SIGNATURE OF DIRECTO)#r AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 5/90 12 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PAL WORKS ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: U-(k1 -V.ole_ -bit'Ur - V DATE CIRCULATED: 8/30/90 COMMENTS DUE: 9/13/90 EFC-097-90 cm(„Ti V�sI • FR.e�,oN N APPLICATION NO(S): R-097-90 SEP '2 '990 PROPONENT: Carl Haglund ECE fr PROJECT TITLE: Haglund Rezone BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks a nonproject programmatic rezone of an approximately 57,584 sf parcel from R-1, Single-Family Residential Use to B-1, Commercial Use. The parcel is currently developed with a small business office. No revision to the existing use or new development is presently being considered. Rezone would result in a nonconforming use becoming a conforming use. Any change to the use would require site plan approval under the Zoning ordinance. LOCATION: 4016 Jones Ave SITE AREA: 51,584 sf BUILDING AREA (gross): 1200 sf IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air 3. Water 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy& Natural Resources_ 7. Environmental Health 8. Land &Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics ! 11. Light&Glare - 12. Recreation 13. Historic&Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities Lartycl—skor._. COMMENTS: �..a 5'!/- 2‘e— We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of le impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. /-tc;'? Signature of Director or Authorize Representative D e ti v. /88 Cam, ✓ �� -E2w, . - -es G-� Reo DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-097-90 APPLICATION NO(S).: R-097-90 ;I PROPONENT: Carl Haglund PROJECT TITLE: Haglund Rezone BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks a nonproject programmatic rezone of an approximately 57,584 sf parcel from R-1, Single-Family Residential Use to B-1, Commercial Use. The parcel is currently developed with a small business office. No revision to the existing use or new development is presently being considered. Rezone would result in a nonconforming use becoming a conforming use. Any change to the use would require site plan approval under the Zoning ordinance. LOCATION: 4016 Jones Ave TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 9/21/90 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION CURRENT PLANNING r I LONG RANGE PLANNING PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON SEPTEMBER 13, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED AAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED alzs- • I DATE: 741.2-7 IGNATURE OF DIRECT OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 5/90 DEPARTr IL I4T OF PLANNING/BUILDING/Pua'iIC WORK Q ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET egre4 46, l' i, REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: S+IR-MY1 1a 4kQJO,04s14,4 4 DATE CIRCULATED: 8/30/90 COMMENTS DUE: 9/7 f �e4 'V/. ,r EFC-097-90 PLANNING DIVISION t'rirs APPLICATION NO(S): R-097-90 ell��OF R�'f\ITON �LC�S' - SEP 2 0 1990 PROPONENT: Carl Haglund ECEWED PROJECT TITLE: Haglund Rezone 97 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks a nonproject programmatic rezone of an approximately 57,584 sf parcel from R-1, Single-Family Residential Use to B-1, Commercial Use. The parcel is currently developed with a small business office. No revision to the existing use or new development is presently being considered. Rezone would result in a nonconforming use becoming a conforming use. Any change to the use would require site plan approval under the Zoning ordinance. LOCATION: 4016 Jones Ave SITE AREA: 51,584 sf BUILDING AREA (gross): 1200 sf IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air 3. Water 4. Plants 5. Animals ' 6. Energy& Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land &Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light&Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic&Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services ' 16. Utilities COMMENTS: - ,� C/ ,Oj .& (g ff � We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Azosi ,, ,,,,i949.t i Representative .,,pDat Sign re of Director or Au hor d e Rev. 6/88 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-097-90 APPLICATION NO(S).: R-097-90 PROPONENT: Carl Haglund PROJECT TITLE: Haglund Rezone BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks a nonproject programmatic rezone of an approximately 57,584 sf parcel from R-1, Single-Family Residential Use to B-1, Commercial Use. The parcel is currently developed with a small business office. No revision to the existing use or new development is presently being considered. Rezone would result in a nonconforming use becoming a i siteIna approval under the Zoning use. Any change to the use would require plan pp ordinance. LOCATION: 4016 Jones Ave TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 9/21/90 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION CURRENT PLANNING LONG RANGE PLANNING PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING: PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON SEPTEMBER 13, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED L APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED Oigpi /(4/3/04-e?-<-4 CyrAzhv-ell 1biz DATE: 1/ �1 P9O SIG ATURE OF D RECTOR OR UTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 5/90 ' DEPARTII IT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PI _ _ _IC WORKS R ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET of y�'tiil,G REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: o I IJZ_ sep � o� ' DATE CIRCULATED: 8/30/90 COMMENTS DUE: 9/1 EFC-097-90 lekb APPLICATION NO(S): R-097-90 PROPONENT: Carl Haglund PROJECT TITLE: Haglund Rezone BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks a nonproject programmatic rezone of an approximately 57,51;14 sf parcel from R-1, Single-Family Residential Use to B-1, Commercial Use. The parcel is currently developed with a small business office. No revision to the existing use or new development is presently being considered. Rezone would result in a nonconforming use becoming a conforming use. Any change to the use would require site plan approval underl the Zoning ordinance. LOCATION: 4016 Jones Ave SITE AREA: 51,584 sf BUILDING AREA (gross): 1200 sf • IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY' 1. Earth 2. Air 3. Water 4. Plants 1 5. Animals 6. Energy&Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land &Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light&Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic&Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities COMMENTS: uNtroF poia 30-AAAL We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of robable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. V 016 Signature of Direct or Aut zed Representative Date Rev. 6/88 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-097-90 APPLICATION NO(S).: R-097-90 PROPONENT: Carl Haglund PROJECT TITLE: Haglund Rezone BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks a nonproject programmatic rezone of an approximately 57,584 sf parcel from R-1, Single-Family Residential Use to B-1, Commercial Use. The , parcel is currently developed with a small business office. No revision to the existing use or new development is presently being considered. Rezone would result in a nonconforming use becoming a conforming use. Any change to the use would require site plan approval under the Zoning ordinance. LOCATION: 4016 Jones Ave TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 9/21/90 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION CURRENT PLANNING LONG RANGE PLANNING PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON SEPTEMBER 13, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: '-FlIc. P APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED \24DAA,6511(j1141-1. DATE: IP) Sq SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 5/90 DEPARTIL-.,.1T OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PL..,,,IC W %' `• el ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET C/7), G3p )) REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 00Lt32r- S co A&,6). °P /990 !1 DATE CIRCULATED: 8/30/90 COMMENTS DUE: 9 ..S o,p4(4 EFC 097-90 v PLANNING DIVISION FR�/ CITY QF RFC,,rev �'�s APPLICATION NO(S): R-097-90 SEP 2 0 ,41,G0 PROPONENT: Carl Haglund . PROJECT TITLE: Haglund Rezone BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks a nonproject programmatic rezone of an approximately 57,584 sf parcel from R-1, Single-Family Residential Use to B-1, Commercial Use. The parcel is currently developed with a small business office. No revision to the existing use or new development is presently being considered. Rezone would result in a nonconforming use becoming a conforming use. Any change to the use would require site plan approval under'the Zoning ordinance. LOCATION: 4016 Jones Ave SITE AREA: 51,584 sf BUILDING AREA (gross): 1200 sf IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air 3. Water 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy& Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land &Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light&Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic&Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities • COMMENTS: 7/76-721. We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. . 4-tOhled "is‘//() .5,/:74 45190 Signature of Director or Authorized R resentative 1 Date 9 Rev. 6/88 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-097-90 APPLICATION NO(S).: R-097-90 PROPONENT: Carl Haglund PROJECT TITLE: Haglund Rezone BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks a nonproject programmatic rezone of an. approximately 57,584 sf parcel from R-1, Single-Family Residential Use to B-1, Commercial Use. The parcel is currently developed with a small business office. No revision to the existing use or new development is presently being considered. Rezone would result in a nonconforming use becoming a conforming use. Any change to the use would require site plan approval under the Zoning ordinance. LOCATION: 4016 Jones Ave TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 9/21/90 ENGINEERING DIVISION I TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION CURRENT PLANNING LONG RANGE PLANNING PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON SEPTEMBER 13, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: ��/C1/774� V APPROVED vAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED Ottyl. 76frd—r-1 X.fri,'(-0-e-4/- 4:7 „ et., AlLijo. 662,9 .--,,v-,--74- /9 e / ../...a -4/19p-171 (1fr A7,19"--g— fr,-,1--,0 _:i'6' 9/2,4"01;"'d DATE: /0 �?; ef/9961 SIGNA RE OF DI ECTOR OR THORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 5/90 DEPARTIL::`JT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PL-.,SIC -iiikegrif n, ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET s ep s REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: LAX LCTIll et co /tr..& Ot� /Pt si- 14 DATE CIRCULATED: 8/30/90 COMMENTS DUE: 9/1 709/(ij# EFC-097-90 _ PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF PENTON APPLICATION NO(S): R-097-90 PROPONENT: Carl Haglund SEP 2 0 1990 irsl PROJECT TITLE: Haglund Rezone BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks a nonproject programmatic rezone of an approximately 57,584 sf parcel from R-1, Single-Family Residential Use to B-1, Commercial Use. The parcel is currently developed with a small business office. No revision to the existing use or new development is presently being considered. Rezone would result in a nonconforming use becoming a conforming use. Any change to the use would require site plan approval under the Zoning ordinance. LOCATION: 4016 Jones Ave SITE AREA: 51,584 sf BUILDING AREA (gross): 1200 sf IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air 3. Water 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy&Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land &Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light&Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic&Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services • 16. Utilities COMMENTS: -Pil We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. / ,0 Signature of Director or Authorized Rep�ative Dat \t Rev. 6/88 • DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-097-90 APPLICATION NO(S).: R-097-90 PROPONENT: Carl Haglund PROJECT TITLE: Haglund Rezone BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT,: Applicant seeks a nonproject programmatic rezone of an approximately 57,584 sf parcel from R-1, Single-Family Residential Use to B-1, Commercial Use. The parcel is currently developed with a small business office. No revision to the existing use or, new ;I development is presently being considered. Rezone would result in a nonconforming use becoming a conforming use. Any change to the use would require site plan approval under the Zoning ordinance. LOCATION: 4016 Jones Ave TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 9/21/90 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION CURRENT PLANNING LONG RANGE PLANNING PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON SEPTEMBER 13, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: //7d7—g/e APPROVED vAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED C92/Aa4 4a-47: DATE: ! ( /' SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR A THORIZED REPRESENTATIVE . REV. 5/90 FEE APPLICATION: r9"DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET tENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET • EJ PLAN REVIEW ROUTING SLIP OTHER • APPLICANT: DATE: 9-/Ar 9p JOB ADDRESS: f C��i D/ S-D�tG � tl . �'!• _ NATURE OF WORK: • PROPERTY MANAGEMENT I' 3,-qD DATE RECEIVED Comments Due BY PROPERTY MGMT. Comments or suggestions regarding this application should be provided in writing. Please provide comments to the Comm. Dev. Dept. (C.D.D.) by 5:00 p.m. on above date. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION hole.44.0.rsed,44r FEES APPLIED ri CANNOT APPLY FEES O LEGAL DESCRIPTION NEED MORE INFORMATION O SQUARE FOOTAGE O FRONT FOOTAGE ❑VICINITY MAP It is the intent of this development fee analysis to put the developer/owner on notice, that the fees quoted below will apply to the subject site upon development of the property. All quoted fees are due and payable at the time the construction permit is issued to install the on-site and off-site improvements (i .e. underground utilities, street improvements, etc.) LATECOMER AGREEMENT - WATER PROJECT COST LATECOMER CITY HELD PER• FTG. FEE PRIVATE DEVELOPER HELD —a - LATECOMERS AGREEMENT - SEWER CITY HELD PRIVATE DEVELOPER HELD — _D _ SPECIAL UTILITY CONNECTION CHARGE - WATER UNITS SUCC FEE Single family residential dwelling unit $300/lot x Apartment, Condo, each multiplex unit $175/ea. unit x Commercial/Industrial $.-e�'sa. ft. of property x -S-7,58V-47 . /26 ). SAS. `?1 SPECIAL UTILITY CONNECTION CHARGE - SEWER Single family residential dwelling unit $300/lot x Apartment, condo, each multiplex unit $175/ea. unit x Commercial/Industrial S.01s .ft. of property x ..5Z,6179 gic3 60a SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT (Hospital Area) WATER UNITS SAD FEE DEVELOPMENTS WITH 1500 GPM rIRE FLOWS OR LESS: Area Charge $0.03' p: sq.ft. x Frontage Charge $ .6 00 per front ft. .x DEVELOPMENTS WITH GREAT,' THAN 1500 GPM FIRE FLOWS: Area Charge $0.0+ : per sq.ft. x Frontage Charg: $1: 00 per front ft. x SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRIC (Honey Crk. Intercptr) - SEWER UNITS SAD FEE AREA CHARGES: Residential dwel ing u, ts, apartments or equivalents, $2 % per dwelling unit x Commercial develoim• t: $.05 per sq.ft. of gross site area x FRONT FOOTAGE CHARGES:. $37.19 per Fro: F (on ea. side) x $74.38 per f .ft. (p 'tv .on both sides of imprv.) x —o - rs / 9_ V01� TOTAL: S/0 t 3. 37 V/a above quoyted fggi/no NO ` inc u e nspec on ees, s e se r s r w permit fees or the ost of water met rs. p . , AeOLlote GitAe4.41 17. • DATE 7- rib p Signature of Director or Authorized Re resentativ V �i J IlI . -.•_ Z..; '.'f I " , j \\r . • l. sr1.i.,J,I GOl 1.:•� — ; — — i 11 1 ]hnl=T 21. m _ .sr 4 _ �\ 10002s 1 G► 7, i4 �'llllll` II�Ij1iA111111111� bb tcbo3 ,Ia11'° '31 OJ,, M 4 1 If11111 illimilvmm. A \ \ :. • I, _"•.»iyull 1 vwi<1 : IIIIIIIIIi i11111111f' 11'I�i�AAA� tc ii 1 '13�40 . to '°' " 'I ' 111111111111 111111111! ,1•.• ••1 u. r-'�,� I ��r.,� ,, I` °G Ga i i11111111111111i1111111111 ��„, 1 I. '' E ri 1 !IIIIIIUhIIf1 91lllmlih or1Wl�Gol�®� ,, dplu 1�11►1� 7C1 !s AAAilPSAA I f I. 1' 1 ' f f !i11111111 j1111111111��,r�Cg;11 ,a ` • "c 9` `� \ 11i111111111i1i11 / /11111110.AAAr�AAA t'a: .:3: j;> + II 1i 2i ; " !111111 11 jIN1111111111! iai"G'�'- 1 Xlmint I :6irAl>cl�4TRRI& rillfll�Q�liilO AbAso Si. tL r�1O7r ar03M F� .� i2 vs A11118�111Pllfppil7f�OFi1� GA v I'••I Si.1..:'r:f the Vw r .:'fb•"7 • I 111111/11111N111 - /' �2 1i .+c I as 7 Ci111111! NOW -�,�� zL . I ..Inn f1�111�l111111gs �� iL o, ,� �, / . i ffill:17 / '.3'' wry' sry,►`a + Vv'"• - •I`Ilhi ,� rllf■fl■f■11■11■11W11f11ff110 I ��it_ '�■.ter: 3 vp)r t i y ;Ii:GC�r0OOOO�if�cGGGG lmo / - -'1 1 1% ; 1 G CI P. ' L Ft or ® gin■ ' --�"'�°■� ,; � a ��� ® ; ® you�«r•�MIMI �n.]'+41k?q p rto . . IF.� i�a�� c rs ® a 1ii��i�11,, u�Jpp APR- • 1 • L ' c Ent ' sat CliZEBEW CM 5' • IN ® NM= one no a© ©v / // ' ®- auszw..IVIArriIPi 'Q'D 1 k : /11".-0 l I''J rY► I :I NZ.: � �// 1/ • i- _ �,1, " ,Icy , . - .4.n, IIIV/4/ /• .,\\< '\ :: . iff;- •, A `<a.l�a -1,--1�'111-1 '0 ili I / 11 : •. ' ' ,. ,4, tii._47 1 - . .; . . ' r ' . /) , ' t . •2 641` OGI Q G+1 MI 1 i91 W I... Ai S . J' ' I IxIfiT ,t c s -- 0 6 -� 6 / t s1+��1t q I.1 I KI sl►r_ z� rt � L71 201 fO1, y� 9�� / f"41�1V tl,1 IT 2 1 � 1 / ' / 7y--..- - . 9L • . '...• 4!7r .. / j i 111 / / , . . • . C ..__(.1_...;..11. 2G1"11i+l p71 1 ,� ___1[7 rti • I Oil 9,11 iil�mr S ''T y / // / ,. ,a 7!I ,P I/Jp II /� I /4)I 4'"'t�r' 1 7 r ..` DEPARTMI f OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PU 'C WORKS J ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET o/,ouvRo sI REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: -T'i1rC— � 1 �'1 b 4 /990, Et- DATE CIRCULATED: 8/30/90 COMMENTS DUE: 9/13/90t_� EFC-097-90 RE 1TON FIRE DEPT. FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU - APPLICATION NO(S): R-097-90 AUG 31990 PROPONENT: Carl Haglund PROJECT TITLE: Haglund Rezone RECE IVED BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks a nonproject programmatic rezone of an approximately 57,58/ sf parcel from R-1, Single-Family Residential Use to B-1, Commercial Use. The parcel is currently developed with a small business office. No revision to the existing use or new development is presently being considered. Rezone would result in a nonconforming use becoming a conforming use. Any change to the use would require site plan approval under the Zoning ordinance. LOCATION: 4016 Jones Ave SITE AREA: 51,584 sf BUILDING AREA (gross): 1200 sf - IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air 3. . Water 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy&Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land &Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light&Glare _ 12. Recreation 13. Historic&Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services ci 16. Utilities COMMENTS: ; We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. a a-99 . .��! /9?d Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Rev. 6/88 DEPARTML . : OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUC WORKS DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-097-90 APPLICATION NO(S).: R-097-90 PROPONENT: Carl Haglund PROJECT TITLE: Haglund Rezone BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks a nonproject programmatic rezone of an approximately 57,584 sf parcel from R-1, Single-Family Residential Use to B-1, Commercial Use. The parcel is currently developed with a small business office. No revision to the existing use or new development is presently being considered. Rezone would result in a nonconforming use becoming a conforming use. Any change to the use would require site plan approval under the Zoning ordinance. LOCATION: 4016 Jones Ave TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 9/21/90 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION CURRENT PLANNING LONG RANGE PLANNING PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. .I PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON SEPTEMBER 13, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED al66/ ee-A-')-3r-4/ • �y�-- DATE: a", s SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 5/90 / `� • CITY OF RENTON Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann, Administrator August 30, 1990 Carl Haglund 3308 S Judkins St Seattle,WA 98144 SUBJECT: Haglund Rezone R-097-90 • Dear Mr. Haglund: The Development Services Division of the City of Renton has formally accepted the above-referenced application for preliminary review. , It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Technical Advisory Committee on September 21, 1990. Within three days of that review, you will be notified that: 1) your application Is complete and has been scheduled for environmental review and determination, or 2) that additional Information Is required to continue processing your application for environmental review. Please contact me,at 235-2550, if you have any questions. . Sincerely, id4jr\j°1(3L" Lenora Blauman Project Manager cc: Caryn Spain 3308 S Judkins St Seattle, WA 98144 • accplltr/LB/kac 200 Mill Avenue South- Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2631 . - . ' [ rezone.': August 22, 1990 3308 S. Judkins St. PLANNING DIVISION Seattle, WA 98144 CITY OFRENTON ' (206) 329 7601 ' ADG9 4 1990 Laureen Nicolay ��������G��Q��� Community Development Department ������Q�0Yf ���� City of Renton Renton , WA RE: Haglund Rezone 4016 Johes Ave NE Renton , WA Dear Laureen: Enclpsed are the PMT 's I forgot to include with my rezone application last week. Please review the materials I have submitted and let me know how , I .can assist you and your staff in this rezoning process. Thank You for ezur oelp and patience. . ' ` �� � � >MA�•�TE•RAPPLI. A • >� ����`1ISlNE��: > �< > �< ���> � <`�� ��<>�> >« �...�.P•:'::�� �F'APP:Lt.0 O FEES ... • . . ..... ..... . ..... ....... .. . .. ..... ... . ... ..... .... ... ...... .............. NAME: Carl Haglund /REZONE $ g'9.O CO Caryn Spain _SPECIAL PERMIT $ _TEMPORARY PERMIT' $ _ ADDRESS: 3308 S. Judkins St _.CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $ Seattle, WA 98144 _SITE PLAN APPROVAL $ _SPECIAL PERMIT $ CITY: Seattle .'r _GRADE&FILL PERMIT• • $ (NO.CU.YDS: *VARIANCE $ TELEPHONE NUMBER 329-7601 (FROM SECTION: • ) *WAIVER $ ROUTINE VEGETATION MANAGEMENT PERMIT• $ NAME: Carl Haglund e (*JUSTIFICATION REQUIRED) ADDRESS: 3308 S. Judkins St. SUBDIVISION: $ _LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $ CITY: Seattle ZIP: 98144 _SHORT PLAT $ _TENTATIVE PLAT $ _PRELIMINARY PLAT $ TELEPHONE NUMBER FINAL PLAT $ 329-7601 NO.OF LOTS: • PLAT NAME: PRODEC fNFO:F MAAT:ON: PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT:• $ 4016 Jones Ave. NE _PRELIMINARY FINAL , ',PROPERTY/PROJECT ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION: 401:6 Jones Ave, NE . Renton, WA "• _BINDING SITE PLAN: $ • KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): 334570 0096 08 MOBILE HOME PARKS: $ 334570 0097 07 TENTATIVE EXISTING LAND USE(S): _PRELIMINARY small office FINAL PARK NAME: EXISTING ZONING: NO.OF SPACES: R-1 • /ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $ I,C, •CO PROPOSED LAND USE(S): PROJECT VALUE: $ 55.O00 SENSITIVE AREA: N Personal office space for small business APA: 1 _2 _OTHER Na Churl P+ SEWER MORATORIUM AREA: YES PROPOSED ZONING. • B-1 ' • TOTAL SITE AREA(SQ.FT.OR ACREAGE): :DATE PAID: 57,584' • • • • POSTAGE PROVIDED: AP NO '60 PLANNING DIVISION ::.4•i;';':��};' i::tiv::.•::'::•:•::'•:•��•i.'}i:';'i'ri:'::�:•i;'':''r: :':i::•:ii:•;;:•:•;•:::'t�:}�;:'r;•:'i?Y•:':v::::'�• v;:;:.i::;:};iC,r:�;:':::'':•:•.'':':•:•:•: }}:':•::i•y;i;ti;�:ti�(:�;+,i,: • s�s:�:ct on::k:o:be�:c�ori:•:leke�dt����::�:it":�t�................................................................................. ................ ::: V:>:f1�AD::<>W`:<>PI:lD::::>::�FP7D::<:>'SM::::::::' 1VIE:<:s:P1VIr I�'. ... ....5................ ............. ......... ....... .............. .. ....... ........... . .. .. ..::........:::.:.... ........::.......:...:....... P .. ; O .; 1400:ERT igr im<> i nmo < . ES.CRIPTION.O.�..R.ROiPERTY.. .. ..... .... .. .. ..... . ... ......... . . e s att C � se ar to s eet . • The South 1/2 of Lot 9 in Block 2 and the East 1/2 of the North 1/2 of Lot 9 in Block 2 of Hillman's Lake. Washington Garden of Eden Division No. 7, as per plat recorded in volume 16 of Plats, Page 18, Records of King County. • I, ` i § xx: CARYN, SPAYN , being duly sworn, declare that.I:"am (plrease check one) _ ibccliatlamindc XX the owner-;of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. SU SCRIBED SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS / cAY OF_______19 do.Ask-11K0 NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE S,' 0F;a,„"* WASHINGTON,RESIDING A 4 rc°, N '9R oTy � A ��•:t1�6.�UBLI • o , j• r �6� 1 �� � _ %. . 0 eon ��F •.ti 2�. r� ' g j (Name of Notary Public) ®0p�...S \� �1 (Signat of Owne Caryri Spain V f' �Qe 3308 S. Judkins St (Address) (Address) Seattle, WA 98144 • (City/State Zip) (City/State/Zip). (206) 329-7601 (Telephone) (Telephone) Acceptance of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete application. Plans and other material required to constitute a complete application are listed in the"Application Procedure." • • RRtnMastr 2/90 • State of Washington ) County of King ) ss . Carl Haglund being first duly sworn upon oath , deposes and states ; that he is the 'applicant for the subject City of Renton Master Application ; he is the owner of the property nvolved in the application ; he states the foregoing statement and answers contained in the application and the information submitted with the application are in all respects true and cor ct t he best of my knowledge and belief . Car land 3308 S . Ju i St . Seattle , W. 8144 SUBSCRIBED & SWORN to before me this / ay of 1990 NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RESIDING AT 4.. MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES //. /;& �ey0 41/4�-°°. ®°��.A74 4®o ° °®, v 006 ° ^A ( N e ofc Notary P lic) } :o OT4Ay rn, 4(,&44 N ( Addy s� /�� '�` t?`%-.;°26, '• �po� (UJ rim `c wA S�+\ pi, ( City/State ip) �'� a6 7 Lam- /ire Z ( Telephone) ti PLANNING DIVISION rezone CITY OF RENTON July 26, 1990 JUL 3 1 1990 RECEIVED Department of Planning City of Renton Renton , WA RE : Rezoning R1 propert to B1 4016 Jones Ave NE Renton , WA Dear Person : I need your help . I am applying to have my property rezoned from R1 to 81 . The subject property is approximately 52, 000 ' . There is an exisiting garage and house on the property . The house was converted into a small office over ten years ago and has been used as an office since that time . I am seeking to have the zoning formally changed to bring this structure into compliance . I do not have any plans to further develop the property through the construction of additional buildings or expansion of the existing structures . Pursuant to your requests , I asked the property owner immediatly to the North of my parcel to particpate in the joint rezoning of our R-1 parcels . The person wants to buy my parcel and is not willing to participate at this time . Will you please review my request for a rezone in the light that the other parcel owner does not want to participate . My property is currently zoned R1 and is designated in the comprehensive plan as a B1 site . The property is located just 300 ' East of I-405 and just 500 ' south of the # 7 exit from the highway . The neighborhood is charectorized by large undeveloped parcels to the South and West and commercial uses to the North . There is significant noise pollution as I-406 is only 300 ' from the subject . Except for the small house next door , all other neighborhoods are commercial . Except for the subject and the small house next door all other parcels to the immediate East , West and North are currently zoned 81 . The immediate neighbors include : a trucking company , a mini storage facility, a cabinet ' manufacturing facility, and a large warehouse . To the North • approximately 700 ' is a large commercial and retail neighborhood . The commerical center includes a Motel , a couple of restaurants, a couple professional office buildings , a convience food store and some community businesses . { 4- Currently the subject property is used by a Civil Engineering firm and office space is provided for a contractor . I have no plans to develop the property any further . Any changes the City would require to bring the site into compliance with the Commercial building codes or commercial landscaping codes would be completed in an expediant mannor . I am requesting the zoning be changed from R1 to 81 . This zoning change is both appropriate and timely for the following reasong : • 1 . A residential use of the property is incompatable with adjacent land uses . The charector of the neighborhood is commercial and industrial . Significant noise pollution from I-405 and the commercial nature of the neighborhood are incompable with residential zones . 2 . The property is potentially zoned for commercial use according to the City of Renton Comprehensive plan . 3. The property has been used continuiously for over a decade as a commercial office and this use is appropriate for the neighborhood and fits in with the long term development plans for the City of Renton . 4. There is a shortage of moderately priced older offices in the area located a convient distance from I- 405 . Reasonably .priced office space in the South Bellevue and Factoria areas are unavailable . Reasonably priced office space in South Renton , is too far South for many , Business Because of I-405 congestion . There is a demand for the moderately priced office space at the subject property which is still located a short commuting distance to South Bellevue . Please review the materials I have submitted and let me know how I can assist you in this rezoning process . Thank You for you help and patience . Sincere , • • 1 H 1 d • OF RENTON .... :... . : .:;:.;:::::::. •:CITY: MENT/aL' CHE CKLIST Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probably significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide • whether an EIS is required. • Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist ask you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. • You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not•know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. • Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark , designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will ' help describe your proposal or its environmental.effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impacts. • • Use of Checklist for Nonproject Proposals: (Please Type or Print Legibly) Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply". IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). • For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: 014 6L Lmo J2 Q3A 0661 c nru iv 2. Name of applicant: • Nom Carl Haglund No s kQ d A.uo rrid 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 3308 S. Judkins St., Seattle, WA 98144; (206) 329-7601 4. Date checklist prepared: 5. Agency requesting the klist: CC Vt-rtkA -2- • 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): nk 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansions, or further activity related to or • connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. no 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. p o�J 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. no 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for. your proposal, if known. none 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topography map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. 4016 Jones Ave NE, Renton; S. 1/2 of lot 9 in block 2 of the North 1/2 of Lot 9 in block 2 of Hillman's lake washington garde on eden division no. 7 as per plat recorded in volume 16. of plats,page 18 B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS Earth a. General description of the site (circle one); flat, rolling, hilly, steep, slopes, mountainous, other FLAT . b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?) level c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, scaly, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. peat and sandy loam and gravel d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. none -3- e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. none f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, • generally describe. no g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? under 10% of the lot h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. none b. Are there any off-site sources of emission? none c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: 3. WATER a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. small stream ap proximately 80' south of site 2) Will the.project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. no 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. none 4)' Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. no 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. no 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. no 1 "-' .... ..,..�. ..+7.. ,dA y h.. r .v.A.:. ,,.,, ,?;;.:. . ._ °+r w.7S+d,..,. .. .+.. .t ,.4 r'_'.L''•;g FF'4., eC' .. 4. * ,�'4:L as; ,,. ,. .r , ��., ., • -4- b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. no 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. no -discharge; property on sewer c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters, If so, describe. water runoff will be collected on site 2) Could waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. no • d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Limit-the development of the site; most of the property will remainunpaved and not covered by buildings. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: x deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other x evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other x shrubs grass crop or grain x wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Some grass and wet soilds plants will be removed. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. none d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measure to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Propose to landscape front of property to screen building from roadway. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Some small brown birds observed on property. Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other ^.'xt, d',:.:a r...i,;...•3X' s.. ,',., r+YS ru x..i..A` ".h. .. ,d R.. . n r'-i+-w ` -5- • b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. none c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain • no d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: none 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, wood, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. • Electric heat will be used to heat the office. • b. Would' your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. no c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any k.) 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. no 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. 0N � 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the areas which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Located 1/2 block from 405. Significant traffic noise at the property. • 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Some traffic noise would be.generated. • 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Small office for a contractor. Neighboring property is. a single family house. All other neighbors are•businesses. • b.• Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. no • �1 y..,,$'....N i.•..M;' f�.�"r.rY'';.., :;rev:-s a..r AY:;. .?iJ .'�."k'.syF ..,r.zr ,rc.•t`�ti`...f. ,n.,,a,,:. r^r.y, ^r�.. :e ,' .. � EtM,::.nNl.,... .. , t • -6- c. Describe any structures on the site. Small house that has been converted into an office. A detached garage approximately 1 ,000 square feet. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? no e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Single.family - designated on comp plas as B-1 f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? B-1 g. If applicable, what is the.current shoreline master: program designation of the site? lI::: J ) . h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. no i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? =5-_regular workers j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? none k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: 1 1 b0 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land` uses and plans, if any: • 6\1-11 ) Lt+b(-4 9. Housing , a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing.. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: jo ,‘„, 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal .exterior building material(s) proposed. 1.2' b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? none c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Landscaping buffer along street . 11. Light and Glare { -7- a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? none b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere • with views? no • c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? none • d. Pro sed measures to reduce or control light an glare impacts, if any: -(06,c ,..\Dj U 0\AL 12. Recreation V a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? • none b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. • no c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. • no b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site, none c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: • • -8- • 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Property is on Jones Avenue NE b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? no. Bus stop is approximately 1 ,000' away. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? 7 parking spaces d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private? no e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. no f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. 10 round trips g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: 1�J"o 1 5. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. no b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. Electricity, water, telephone, sewer, refuse service b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. no additional utilities proposed • • • 1! -9- - C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the'bes•t of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understos•i th t e lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it mi!, 'It is e n Iiance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation 6r wil ul ac of full c 'Jclosure on my part. Proponent: ' Name Prii d: aglu i C yn Spa' • -10- 4 � wry . • D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR.NONPROJECT ACTIONS (This sheet should only be used for actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs. Do not use this sheet for project actions.) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: • 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: • 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: • 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? 4 4 -11- Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information► is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misreCA!LJ- 74 nt ' m oillful lack of full disclosure my rt. AZu \ OProponent: J Name Printed: i PLEASE DIRECT CORRESPONDENCE TO: Transamerica No. : 0858405 Transamerica Title Insurance Co. Customer No. -- 320 108th Avenue N.E. Seller : Haglund/Spain P.O. Box 1493 Buyer/Borrower . ---- Bellevue, WA 98009 Prepared for: By C ��� 20TH CENTURY DEVELOPMENT itle gf�cer 3308 S. JUDKINS (I SEATTLE, WA 98144 For service on this order, call: ATTN: CARL HAGLUND 646-8589 (FAX #646-8593) JOHN W. JONES or CINDY L. ESSER SCHEDULE A EFFECTIVE DATE: March 7 , 1989 at 8:00 A.M. 1 . Policy or policies to he issued: Amount (X) Alta Loan Policy (6-1-87) See Note 1 Premium ( ) Alta Loan Policy-1970 Tax (Amended 10-17-70) Short Term Rate Proposed Insured: TO BE DETERMINED Total 2. Title to fee simple estate or interest in said land is at the effective date hereof vested in: CARL HAGLUND AND CARYN SPAIN, HUSBAND AND WIFE 3. The land referred to in this commitment is situated in the County of King, State of Washington and is described as follows: THE SOUTH 1/2 OF LOT 9 IN BLOCK 2 AND THE EAST 1/2 OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF LOT 9 IN BLOCK 2 OF HILLMAN'S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN DIVISION NO. 7, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 16 OF PLATS, PAGE 18, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY; SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. PLANNING DIVISION crf(OF RErfON f 1 5 1990 SCHEDULE B EXCEPTIONS: Schedule B of the policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following matters unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company. A. Standard exceptions set forth on inside back cover. B. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires for value of record the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. C. Instruments necessary to create the estate or interest to be properly executed, delivered and duly filed for record. 1 . General taxes, as follows, together with interest, penalty and statutory foreclosure costs, if any, after delinquency: (1st half delinquent on May 1; 2nd half delinquent on November 1) TAX ACCOUNT NO. YEAR AMOUNT BILLED AMOUNT PAID PRINCIPAL BALANCE 334570-0097-07 1989 $705.00 $ .00 $705.00 The levy code for the property herein described is 2151 for 1989. 2. Liability for supplemental taxes for improvements which have recently been constructed on the property. Said improvements are not presently assessed, , but may appear on future rolls. 3. ASSESSMENT: ORIGINAL AMOUNT: $844 .57 INTEREST: 7.75% FROM: August 10, 1979 ANNUAL INSTALLMENTS: 10 INSTALLMENTS PAID: 4 INSTALLMENTS DELINQUENT: 5 NEXT INSTALLMENT DELINQUENT: August 10, 1989 LEVIED BY: City of Renton FOR: Sewers L. I.D. NO: 284 ASSESSMENT NO. : 14 (Covers the East 1/2 of the North 1/2 of said Lot 9) (Said assessment is in foreclosure) • PAGE 2 0858405 4. ASSESSMENT: /://:/// ORIGINAL AMOUNT: $4 .301 .09 INTEREST: 7.75% • FROM: August 10, 1979 ANNUAL INSTALLMENTS: 10 • INSTALLMENTS PAID: 4 INSTALLMENTS DELINQUENT: 5 • NEXT INSTALLMENT DELINQUENT: August 10, 1989 LEVIED BY: City of Renton FOR: Sewers L. I .D. NO: 284 ASSESSMENT NO. : 15 (Covers the South 1/2 of said Lot 9) (Said assessment is in foreclosure) 5. ASSESSMENT: ORIGINAL AMOUNT: $2,651 .21 • INTEREST: 7.75% • FROM: September 27, 1976 ANNUAL INSTALLMENTS: 17 INSTALLMENTS PAID: 3 • INSTALLMENTS DELINQUENT: 9 NEXT INSTALLMENT DELINQUENT: September 27, 1989 LEVIED BY: City of Renton FOR: Watermains • L. I .D. NO: 291 ASSESSMENT NO. : 28 (Covers the East: 1/2 of the North 1/2 of said Lot 9) (Said assessment is in foreclosure) 6. PENDING ACTION IN: King County SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NO. : 89-2-01556-1 BEING AN ACTION TO: Foreclose L. I .D. Assessments 284 and 291 PLAINTIFF: City of Renton DEFENDANT: GVR, et al ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF: Lawrence J. Warren 7. MATTERS RELATED TO ALTA MORTGAGEE'S POLICY COVERAGE, DISPOSITION OF WHICH WILL BE DETERMINED BY OUR INSPECTION: (a) Questions of survey; • (b) Rights of persons in possession; (c) Material or labor liens; • NOTE: Our ALTA inspection and our report of the matters disclosed thereby will be made when the mortgage lien is perfected. WE WILL REPORT ON CLEARANCE OF ENCROACHMENT AND REMAINING ALTA QUESTIONS UPON BEING ADVISED THAT THE FOUNDATION FORMS ARE IN PLACE. PAGE 3 0858405 • NOTE 1 : The Company may have further requirements if the amount to be insured exceeds the current assessed valuation. NOTE 2: Assessed Valuation: Land $24,300.00 Improvements $31 ,000.00 END OF EXCEPTIONS INVESTIGATION SHOULD BE MADE TO DETERMINE IF THERE ARE ANY SERVICE, INSTALLATION, MAINTENANCE OR CONSTRUCTION CHARGES FOR SEWER, WATER OR ELECTRICITY. IN THE EVENT THIS TRANSACTION FAILS TO CLOSE, A CANCELLATION FEE WILL BE CHARGED FOR SERVICES RENDERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH OUR RATE SCHEDULE. ENCLOSURES: Sketch RLR/al PAGE 4 0858405 No. W-AYi-555 ' viow Form No.eoR) "'?ER NO._aS&`/C B.,.:ROW NO. LOAN NO. MORTGAGOR PLAT MAP Vol PG iai Q w w CO Z 9` 5e S Z 9iC o Do05rsi Q o t Na y �o �� ' 7 1 a3s �s1. 5 n, • u .v es- s3-API ? E-,-83RD. ST 1 o S ry% o et' ti / iV ifi. s� 29>'.za i4te. 4-4 r Q o i % N' ..... I v I Dr V r _ / V 1tif 9 / i. t 49. oy AI 14 " ° f ti A y '. 2 •N \ ti� 0 t i Aior (leer, 1 I, 'CoNTyN omo .:e.7, • f-- .his map does not purport to show all-highways , roads or easements affecting said property; no liability is assumed for variations in dimensions and location. `: �NTo • .. ...... ............ .......... >1111: 1;>: 1.1 >:: :•s:-DE'PARTMEN1 ;Q:."6.OMMUN: :T:Y 144" EL;OPMEN.111:::::::. :::..•:.11:iili.. .... •=;F<<N.OTI.F,ICATI:O.N;::O.F::PRAP:ERT1(. .�W.N........ .. ..................::::::::::::::::: �i}:�:•:::•}ii'ri?'::}iii):•i:?J:i•}:ii:i}:ii::•i::.4�:�; •. :.:1.'��'�::i.; �; �: ".;:;. :::.:'�� '�::::.•... :;.: � :•�:•:.:...... ..�.,...: .::ti•.....: ::...:•:.::::::CJiii?ii::v?ii'•iii:Ji:• :•::i:J}}:� 5;:•s0:0'::.'",f.e.e.t:>.<:.o f::.>the:: :sub j ect:.::•:s;it.e:::;:»> .;:.:o::.::;:.::- >::•::<.:;.;;:•>:.;;:.: ***FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY*** PROJECT TITLE: 4016 Jones Ave NE,, Renton APPLICANT: Carl Haglund APPLICATION NUMBER: 1:3—cD17- 'j0 . . The following is a list of property owners within 300 feet of the subject site. The Community Development Department will notify these individuals of the proposed development. NAME • ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER Clarissa Fawcett ' 4008 Meadow Ave N. 322405-9010-0 Renton, WA 98056 JWH Chellson 8189 S. Sandy Hook Dr 334570-0120-0 Clinton, WA 98236 Fryc Oldrich 21505 196th Ave SE 334570-0076-0 Renton, Wa 98058 • James D. Evavold 8425 110th Ave SE 334570-0110-0 Renton;' WA 98056 Charles C Dietsch 3737 Park Ave N - 334570-0095-0 Renton, WA 98056 334570-0085-0 334570-0080-0 334570-0082-0 ' ,I NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER • CERTIFICATION • I, Carl Haglund , hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property owners and their addresses were taken from the records of the King County Assessor as prescribed by law. pes6 M L. ► f ATTEST: Subscribed .nd sworn.to before�o9Q \�� at C{e3C,' me, allot P `\.li in,: d fir the eo �`� °`< 5 , �a Washington si.e�,�la at � aN o on the / to -` � o `7 �I p acn a.�, �ignean:< 77of; o o ° 40, L Or WAS`' 1S19P CERTIFICATION FO ` YA,J 4G I, __.4 C.. , hereby cer ify that notices of the public meeting on. the : bject site plan approval ere mailed on 3©)i°I.IO , to each listed a d jacent property owner as-prescribed"by law. 111 ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in ..ad for the State of Washington ,r siding at ✓tLia__.i on the day o ta..,,A` `G . `%TN i Signed: `"- 4 t. Rev 1/ ' ,,,�� nngqig,i CER '4OT2.doc p♦�pe►ETJ.pG :♦ �Q;••.s10N •• ,��i ;• s g•n NOTARY'S • � • _*— : PUBLIC : 2? p.tt` •... .. A ♦♦ .( •'.%-'{'' .t•i'• ,' .r ',y •'i: .:lr'• 'lj,r' ,h.,t,;,,..' '''sJ;i `•..IS1 i'+ - .p.' .)I.'. t': • �5�:$,. • '.:ti' it's .rA s•' {{ ,A"+.gp',r.:.- Y��'°. •a:`�r i •-1 !•7J`t. r;b.e.., ,'1�;5::5, ,,.: 1- y'•. Ja". ;E' o.� 7 k ;',"V. 't: v! n;. r :-,° a•:. �'d''.o;: .>' ,rer` ,c.�_: ,3 :.R t 'a. 4'rt"' :r '`.�, p �,1. 't ,.1: is 1-..�' ''t�. p 4"' f I. Li, �+iY .:l. t t ' J" .J,i .A '7 Y, J•n '4 sr• n., :Yt:H - ▪ V'l 4' `r• ( i:ry r. t: i; •a .'ir 'F. 'Y'a t 1, , :, 1' t. y,'' i •!' m y:. �`r 'r •. rS'i S'• 7 t E _`% iir ` 'a 'r.' .4: 'f C�• '•t • �s d' 'l..r' •r,E' �,lF •i n.: e t. 1 ✓ .r r„� J•Y„ r}�.,.. i�• ,ylt 7: ,:f ::i� :t' 1'r • F wYr ti� h+' F y)• - 3r ' ?niv� 'iY, r'.{ a3, ; p „`�.; .fit_. K .+"7 %Y+,t f - e}i s 1 •.r!Y a;l� 7f 41{ :1 r 9 - 4 ,Y r'�,, i•" }� I ! '1.r •t' 1. r't r`5..y t,.a r1. b 'i '1`i. a .j,' b ,� { •i Y. J +.V k 11 ,yi: F :.7a "Y l i•,'',: t_ r�Y J�^Ii )' :�.i 1f i) 4' L 4�' '7 fu { c'�� 11 +4�'t , Ise' ,,r. �'S;i ''C� ry r ,� 4' t,' `5• �/ • 'T '`l1 ��'r t`:r'' '•7 (7 1' i t: •r 1 • aK' mac' �i• 'S".' •: '�6'.'. ur. • . i. i f<.q: a x 1'• S ( t' •t:j.•J P 4 ,J. :�• • i't1 �'S' - '1' I h /�t ,S1 'i S : it: ' ; F. ?4P ' : '$ , )' j. i•r z .K i . 1 ',t. t0 ..r -r 1� t; ' r' ,i �JY :r.4•.•� t' I ' , ��cI �' '1. s ir', „ , e 'lc' :i;A pi' ti '• k' r':1i _.' •is :• J - 1 k l ' • t F • ^.id' ' .,' '7r •'r� a: .di ` bi ' ' �Yi t 4:. R. F.` b'Fy ' ip:t yJ , , o- ` + ' t �y( •'> 1 � r r'• t :4 ,4• L ,' r)i 7 i� LIB, { , a 'f 1 t. ek:;1 r K `Y � • I 4: • r, ti Via. .A �.:.,:..,,t+p .,k. '�l.'�1 E. '(t .•r... �t' ^).:,P `ly,�l .1. • .t •� i 'y q'%t.'Fi �c+ .,I .3:k, ,4 't -3.t":' is h h t :3: .r l: rti' t' e • s- tc •'4. Y v'1:L` f:. p 'i`%' •v' S t. 1�+▪ 4' .±ir .......:,4•.•i,.....,...... ,..,....,.• Nei. ,f• ^7' f'•., sr �r S` F. •7'k t ''Y "1' i r,s, it • .i:. {, ���,;.. tr 1, i ,) 'ak '4 - +'i.1• R .s! F "j �' e, %.y r,, ( Fi. . ni 5° rn- r i4 7 ,n 'i 'Y rr ��.{. �(, •r k T �'Y 1� a ' • y.. F , 'i: i 1• , t: ;y. a y. �A t :p, • :: '` • • `` 1 IGATE RECEIPT 7i; •,-. ris. , i,, EC•EIF'T DUET_ —__.-__- =— ,�;• •; F'1._'CAT E fi —_ --=__-- fiJ'; ';.:• : _' A ' +'';: CI'i'i '1 REA JUF F.,• , t; 4r4 f7r�: f 1° 1991:1 7— it19 Its_ ,— ;,. REIa,hC:F 1 _ — ',r;4s, CASHIER ID =--•---- _-- j. t4 -•_•-_'--_—_--- — tuff.l)1:1 '.i ':i<s`, , r.r °.; ---= - RE D c, :`.-4 e-!in] 11I5C:ELLA1';EOU A 5 v : F ':';` tJl .VIEW FEE 111EhaTAL RF ,,','.:;:k;,; +, '.Aa,'' .`r't�: 'IRiI1 1 li litl:113 7 f: : r;, ;7;;;,: lV 7.81.u+t. t o',it„ilii �. . :``.,: :;E,"' ;"4- ..t Q+,. 11.1EDU5 RE • `:;tip' • c Jl-f;1''1 Af'F'FtOVAL _. - I:- 7.;.' ; { 4' ,JIfE ci ui,itti4.ltitl}L,1� S tall . ss,1:ii '.i.. 11._. - 1E0Us RE y' ; • . ;' : + _I,_I_AF ,:ti,4,i "Y 'z FC3TACE1 9.9_.42,itiiiII1 1rt''';' , = I0.30•'-'1 -- • 1 c 4 TOTAL. DUI: . a; : ": I ED FFcOt1� ,]1.:.`" ;, %'i'i •'`'I C•ARt- ED H'r:"'?, • 4 t • f41 r,jl„00 rMir • ..;.f« .`,. • ` .r' ^NGE" DUE ,`:' :''4. 41: Ca.IM 5: ::),Ii. ATE RECE IPT DUF'l ','•t t:, ey,, • `cSi • ti 1' 'r i. • s +r, ` • f p • • �(• lrIr .. o-,rt s, • Y ;' •� < ',. I ,':., ..7 ' a , :>; . { fii; t 1 t r'• ':1 k( ,, .l�7 : 7 ,1. ' y I4. t ' Y5` K • 'r f 'i r r • •?rl3 �� I '1 ;�J ;:.q+' • , , L • t• EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SOUTH 1/2 OF LOT 9 IN BLOCK 2 AND THE EAST 1/2 OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF LOT 9 IN BLOCK 2 OF C.D. HILLMAN'S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN, DIVISION NO. 7 AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 16 OF PLATS, PAGE 18 RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON TOGETHER WITH ALL THAT PORTION OF LINCOLN PLACE NE AS VACATED BY CITY OF RENTON ORDINANCE 2961 THAT WOULD ATTACH BY OPERATION OF LAW TO SAID LOT 9 OF C. D. HILLMAN'S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN DIVISION NO. 7. D:91-772:MD:ps • • . . . . ... , CITY OF RENTON t.. . rir, ,Z-:;::?.:,';''V.:X.ti,f;P.' "0-5' • '`,.i.',:1,--.:-:::?..::_T: NTON ,,,,,,,-:•,,,,,,„:,,,,,,,,,:::-/ ir,st,'.,..;: ,. ....,:.....7:.,----:,7 . I t .: ZONING MAP , . 1_1J i A, ,,.. .i•-., „,-, i : .:•::-..::,,,,-.-,:, „ • '-:"...-, '' ::::1: R-1.(1) ZONING MAP LEGEND . . PROPOSED REZONE AREA --:%-.1 >-, --.< . I I / SYMBOL DISTRICT USE _ ... ..,,,,,,;!",,,.•,, / 4,,,, .ir-, • • ,.:`, E-1 • I G-1 I RESIDENTIAL - SINGLE-FAMILY 4,-.2-•;:- / a '' 41' ST . . c•-•;- 0--, / :f...L1,%#ZZAL-;,----- -;k i I R-1 RESIDENTIAL - SINGLE-FAMILY Y__ 11 - < ik 1 , - * .,-krqi R-1 _,8- • 1 1 II . _ Awn I R-2. I . RESIDENTIAL - TWO-FAMILY r , (..9 - minsmaii • d I . AlfgaitliU1111 3T - Pil • Li_i = . -‘ rirr-m:411R4 RESIDENTIAL -.MULTIPLE-FAMILY 44,43::::eli'l . ...-N11111115,1 i i LI n 10•11111111011111M '--- 1 \III , ' 111111 ,......oelftgiq RESIDENTIAL - MULTIPLE-FAMILY : AID11111111 Siff/AIM= 1 k 0 , /SIMI UM munorms I - i j6th - ST k - . PUBLIC USE i • imptInes. Atm AINEW,11211111111/111111M 1 1 1 . i c_ c, W fl -...,----,.: BUSINESS USE I I _i ki ,3•54 1 n'i :=F---- . ....,: . "i : .,,,:-.;0-4 OFFICE PARK , , , IINI341_11's'ri 1 1 111 - '1.1 3, ••••;1410, •:,:•i- --4 T..loolli3 R-1 . _7 f E I 1 1413WI1411 U ir-1 I WORIO,Ftilli 40:4)il" NE-3-.3rd -Sr 1: ' ..,,.... -. -‘-1-- LIGHT INDUSTRIAL . . { • co f1I II I Ir-U_o 1K jEf3P rF1 I•S If1 1r i. —_ NI3-2: 1111,,,401,;.,,?„,. G-1 - .. . MANUFACTURING PARK I414 1,4 • HEAVY INDUSTRIAL E11KI011R111 • NE 31st ST — - . . • • 111111111111LIMIIIIII . ... _ iiti TRAILER PARK • . , \NIP--•-•-.-------------. - ..___________---N 1111111111k11110,EIN. G-1 , _ .:....,..........111111E11110411g111111111 ri_; : , IVs6 "..." I., 1 9i.IINT11 ... : .:-..2-.T., G-1 IMPORTANT CHECK EACH REZONE ORDINANCE . wrni. \,.;,t‘PF;'.47; • /- FOR POSSIBLE RESTRICTIVE OVENANTS . . .ir."‘,. .... \ f, G, 1 .. ----....."'" • - DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BIRLDING/PUNLIC WORKS 4i.li R-1 R-1 1. E 2Eth ST 1 n . G-1 2 - • i on - 1 .4-0 \ DEVELOINMENT SERVICES INVISION 411).1 • . SCALE. 1' ' 600' • 4, 'I'° MOP 1.DRAVDG V PIM,Tozwarx soma sEcnoi , . , . 02/23/91 15:26:30 . .