Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA86-016 1 I I y I 3 I 4 I 5 I . 6 -TOP 30:5 -TOP 292 FOP 30.5 '��-7bP 2/2- Cg C • INVT 23,8 •C8 INVT/2•WEST 2Z2 TOP 29.3 CB /NVT/2"1WRTH 25.5 �Z� 4 .8 INVT 6"EAST ZZ4 INVT ZZ.2�/�VFt INVT 6' EAST Z6./ TOP 28-/ /NyT/5'NORTH 25.5 't, 70P 29.4 - - - ----"-- -- --- _ - -_-- INVT 24,2(PLAN) NH /NVT/2-50UTH 25.7 _ INVT/2.50UTHWEST 25.6 INVT/2•50L/TH26.0 _- - 70P 18.7 TOP 29.0 -- - ----- - TOP 195 L INVT/2"EAST?6.0 INVT/2"Sa1THwE5T•H2, /NVT 21.8 TOP 2B./ /NVT /B"NORTH 2/..6 Cs/ INVT 23.6 /NVT/8"E957 20,5 pv iS - • • !NV /.2(PLR -TOE'295 _ •B -�- ❑SL=B _- --LPCL ONCRETE-3/OEW.4LK -G TiJP 2T3 - = _ --- - ` 6,r OB NI•/ q LP .-__-_. /NVT/2"NORTHWEST 25.4 / • TOP 30,0 1 /' i,� 4-- H✓ {� STw TLV' 360 P. pi I PP �' a0.00' PP-(} it II aS.o4' O'er K 'O-/NVT/B'"NORTH f 50f/TH 20. B P • ,rr I C ❑ I 44,11' /NVT/1"EAST 25.4 R yY / �i INVT/Z"A82 TH 24.3(PLAN "--1 I I I I I I I /NVT/2'"WEST 26./ '(� .�T6•A6 �i //� EASEMENT ) , ' 1 I f I\•\' I I I I INVT 42" 1L3 O i'L / I ) 1 O EASEMENT I FH 0/ /i • AUDITOR FILE 8208270.i58 1 0 1- I A j / \ \ / I 11 I I •11 AUOTOR FILE 8206270338 I B TOP 28.2 P // j - `\ / I I1I1 m I /INVT/2"'NORTH 23.4 / / \ rl 11 I I HI --- PARCEL B I / l \ T O 35'09 II 41--- Nr/NVT IZ"SOVTH 24.6 ��� PP / l / / \ 7099' T�OB•203J't IIIIIIII I I(�I II•• / 5� - _ ^- IW.aB„ ., I, 1i11 - �-{-�6PZB.7 � I / 1 D •y9 `' -1\ _ II-' �. I[` �IlJI 5Yr0.-__ __ _^ \ o /NVT 12"SouTHWEST 24.7(PPLAN) 10 r i0{<00 / ,y70.0d. I �` •n . I I .III\ 41O.B9 -�`�� r /NVT/B-50UTH 22.3(RAN}' /Z �I .- P2e i 2 y0 \\ // /1 L.52620 - j `\ to, EASEMENT 11 `�g l, 19 I I I N71 B \ apG`',( / , /i-'1`\di _ AUDITOR FILE 0208270360 119'III I L / / i/x� / %i/ \` IIII ,,'°',3,1k21 I , i rH " $o // / I h0 ii/ \" -II 1 ''i -+--- - - - -- �'V97�y4 VV 99i4 l ® ..- AI $'s� A. / 1 //�/ \ \ " l_. _ . J I II I\26 CB I • I I _LW 'l \ / / -Th I'/ / \ \\ I I Iln1 /�// I \\ I3 /lam •lb FH\\ \\ ,I // I -ii ----1\25, // I I° o°U ° `\��_--- r.0 - ----- I.{•!r` 1\ v I • _ 1 \� / /1- i,-, //Jib \I1 I 1° ° ° 3oenD-===_====�i/Jz5 I I o N ��cBN.• �A4,,• --//INVT/2"NORTH 2443 1\ / / II I 1%/ /./ \ \\\ I \ o / �- - -- '-- I 1 �� CB (B✓PIED) / ! //I I 1 1 I \ ° s I �''�--- I I U c'e i .r�.... ■ .1,-1, I /Ir `// l I \ 1 .... �m h \ o ( el a 1 / I 3I rr /26�: / l 1 °\ ° ° • I�_ I ..ww \ Tt, % \ `•' I I I °\° ° • CONCRETE / ly I h W g T �\ \,:b.SLP.E1 �1 \\ i \�I^ `mil J\`J I j II ° I ° SLAB %/ i! ---- - ---- I ^m R I �- U ` � /? 1 I ` ` q �("1 \\ E0.EMENT \ I i I °/° ° ��� / °I:I I I I �❑ A61TOR FILE B203270358 )I I v / '1 I I CB ■ p�1 PARCEL A _fi -.:, \''`\'�\ Wj'zzi,��--_-zt/ I II • �I �io ° U ° ig.....: f� 1 I\�oo° of III m 1 I I l I B .. ,I,,,i. m m • •\ & J I I CONCRETE° I I / I y 1 I 3 11. I \ II" ,{- I SLABS f ! \ / °, I. -,5-1 - I no I III RI-- , � I F CB 1-'^h`- i-- I III 0 FnsTs ° 0 / _ � b m TB • \P� 11 1 1 O 80 /J C SLAB TE i' _____H I I B lot •U TOP 25.5 • .‘\..{\�\ I• 1W I I ! / Ej I •11 I e I �� G -�}��-{(���\\\\j /NVT B'" EDGE _ I I I i O (3) •I C B v1 CL H-- I L-/ WEST ZZ.3 \ ,\` //^\" \ 1 I i /° ° a -_ OI I ``- _ a\S OP 27.0 'F� \ - Ill 1 ° ° /' I I I ,,L A', FN• \ _ 11/ B'"NORTH 234 1 ❑ \ / I 1 °/ °I // `Lr ( \ \ I 1 I o I I-Lh co •EASEMENT W O • y� I �\ /29�i 1 I� ° °1 AUgTOR FILE 85110a05B2 I (7 fp +`l '/oP Z7.0 I • `. / I I I o °I ;Mom ° I I I PARCEL A B B Q \e0�i`,O,'. \``,\/r�T/8 WEST2I,6 CPL4N) l 1 ° lI 1 I I J C'` r.. .•� (NKT 8'"SOUTH 23.3I(P1AN) 1 I 0 : oo 1 'In° n° gm 0 °ill' I 1 �� ``. l I \\. 1 ,/% i u o o a °\ °` S��� ° °II�IIi • l �I PPQ Z \9 \ :\ / o ° ° �/ ,I ,Ifs_ I \ \ / \15/ /-� -- / ��___---_--. -_��y\1, III -- .-_ __ c�• J\\ // III!; 1111I1 l pNH x TOP 24.9 • \\` ` 1 • �_-• TOP 24.0 C IIII�111II) I 3 INVT 8"EAST 2/.4 \ /` INVT 18-NORTH 1B.9 \ III I III111 43" _�, INVT/2'WEST 21.3 i.iD i25 INVT/8`'• 1TH 19.0 I.\ i- ! I1111 I 1 II 1 • N U1 �mf,d• ` INVT 4-EAST 2/./�S -) I \ ¢n I \7�1'millI I CB ^ I ^I .q, LoU1.1 �y s� // ce /B-ss �P ; - cB 1 • m IBSS \ \ 1 III O \ , G7aP 24.0 I VI f ` ,'Ja I/ TOP 24.3 INVT/B NORTH/8.5 - _ \ INVT le-NORTHWEST 18.^ INVT r8-SOUTH[9.4 I 11 I \\-25, I \ • \ /� INVT/B"SOUTH lB.9 .- -INVT 6'EA57 20.3 I _ I N • Ul TOP 25.9 •. I 1 N /- _ -i I\I �:. -_-_ '',- 1 i i• 111 A/Nv7e NORTH h ` \�o\ ____ \ ., m N LEGEND s 22.0(PLAN) •` F1 I ����- -c j1i \ 1 40/44 t a..._r _ PY-- a I, s TOP 24./ -. 70P 23.6 -~ � - -- -_• \ T I __- ,{ ❑CB CATCH BASIN l INVT/B'A(ORTH/9.4 `�A INVT 6-EA5T2/./ `rA A -- FH 2 WATER METER TOP 25.2 INVT 18-5.4ST/9.3 \ /NVT6"WESTZ/.l / 1 INVT/2""NORTH its \ 11 •CB OpV \\ - - ` � ` J y5`�' `TI1CB C= OMI MAN HOLE INVT /B"EAST /9,5 • �� N• •CB ' - R,• 9341 -•T� OT A.. 'o-PP POWER POLE • /NVT 12"WEST lt.9 _ ' - -- CO•FH __• FIFA fl 4290' FH - • INVT 18 SOUTH 19.7 I• \ PV F1TY 4071' • • '' -- CJ F+r/N POWER VAULT/ TELEPHONE VAULT 1 EAT , V I.040 E - ' Co - 6 W CB•• M B40.76' ® 2 IL?4 TOP 30.3 TOP 24.2 !NWT 6"TOP 24.4 OOP 25.0 ` ® INVT I8.6 FO1 LP LIGHT POST INVTB"WEST 2Q-2 EAST 22.2 INVT 6'"EAST 22.2 TFH FIRE HYDRANT INVT IL"EAST 20./ INVT 6-WEST 22.3 INVT 4"WEST 22. . INVT/Z"SOUTH 19.9 \ \ I t r .-•7-• 0714 \ NOTE, NOTES' a�j( S'`..';''1.'''��dd 1 DO WATER VALVE FROM THIS LINE I. THE SITE IS SHOWN AS SURVEYED k Q"�1f (y(0 �I INVT INVERT --- - - - -- _ _ NORTH/5 ON FEBRUARY 1986. Iy�7 �p4��p1'1�, �1 '•• 1: 4 \ SECTION AA _ ^ `)_� _ ; i. �I O SLPB STREET LIGHT POWER BO1( • 2,UTILITY LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS - - '---- \\\ - -y1-- 1` l❑dPi HERE TAAEN FROM AS-BUILT PLANS p ,_- - -- ti - AND VERIFIED IN THE FIELD WHENPRA I19LIil 1yr_� PROPERTY DNE EB 2 0 3 TOPOGRAPHY INFORMATION SOUTH 1986 EASEMENT LINE OF SECTION A A, TAKEN FROM II ----EXISTING CONTOUR D v0 i RENTON PLACE DESIGN DRAWING. SITE CURRENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION. /�� �Ie��c{�yp (^ 2.icAI/� EXISTING FENCE OAND RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. BWLk/Il9IEJ S�� ��1��77 <U w 4 PROPERTY SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS • o • 5 CITY OF RENTON VERTICAL DATUM A-- • ATTACHMENT 4S Q DSGN 1 REUSE OF CPOCUMENTS � SHEET = ® DR THIS DOCUMENT,AND THE'UFOs AND DESIGNS BAR IS ONE INCH ON THREE REN TON PLACE DWG //y�am�7� PORATED HEREIN,AS AN IN;4 RUMENT OF PROFESSIONAL ORIGINAL DRAWING. K1 HILL CHK SERVICE.IS THE PROPERTY 0/OH2M HILL AND IS NOT TO BE 0 I. 1` NO. ni USED.IN WHOLE OR IN PAR!.FOR ANY OTHER PROJECT IF NOT ONE INCH ON DATE FEB. 86 NUJ WITHOUT THE WRITTEN AU'YORIZATION OF CH2M HILL TOPOGRAPHY APVD THIS SHEET,ADJUST D NO, DATE REVISION BY APVD\ °CH2M HILL groat FS ACCORDINGLY. NO JS 2C866.A4 _• ATTACHMENT ' 5 I� 1 EX I� T �`Vj`�. . 1 r... 2 ITEM NO. -Q/4, -$(d rSs; 3 4 BEFORE THE CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER 5 In re THE CALLISON ) City File No. R-016-86 6 PARTNERSHIP; REZONE ) APPLICATION ON BEHALF- OF . ) - APPLICANT' S SUBMITTAL IN 7 RENTON VILLAGE COMPANY, ) SUPPORT OF REZONE APPLICATION ) 8 9 I , 10 REQUEST FOR REZONE 11 A. B-1 Zoning Requested. 12 The applicant requests a rezone for 15 .44 acres to B-1, 13 Business District, from the Heavy Industry District, H-1 and 14 General, G-1 . This rezone will implement Renton' s 15 Comprehensive Plan which designates the site as "Commercial . " 16 This site currently contains an office building (Two Renton 17 Place) which is nearing completion and is proposed for a third 18 office building (Three Renton Place) . The site plan approval 19 application for Three Renton Place has been submitted and a 20 mitigated DNS published. 21 B. Applicant ' s Existing Development on Adjoining Property. 22 The Renton Village Company owns the adjoining property west 23 of the rezone site and has undertaken coordinated development 24 25 APPLICANT' S SUBMITTAL - 1 DAVIS WRIGHT&JONES 3 8 5 3 G LAW OFFICES A PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS 2600 CENTURY SQUARE'150I FOURTH AVENUE SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98101.1688 (206)62z-315o 1, of office, commercial and recreational uses . The existing 2 development on the adjoining land includes the Sheraton Hotel: 3 The Evergreen Building, One Renton Place, retail shopping and 'a 4 cinema complex. This prior development was done under the H-1 5 zoning applicable to the site, which until a 1985 amendment 6 allowed office and retail uses in the H-1 District . The Two 7 Renton Place and Three Renton Place buildings on the rezone 8 site are a continuation of that overall development plan. 9 C. Background on Zoning Request . 10 After the Renton Comprehensive Plan was adopted (1983) 11 showing this site as Commercial and appropriate for B-i zoning, 12 the applicant believed the city had initiated an area-wide 13 rezone to implement the comprehensive plan (as was done in the 14 Valley Planning Area) . As a result of the applicant ' s 15 misunderstanding that the rezone was being done by the City 16 through an area-wide procedure, several consequences have 17 occurred which present severe timing problems for the 18 applicant : (1) the applicant did not object to nor seek any 19 modification of the 1985 amendment to the H-1 zoning which 20 deleted as permitted uses the office/retail development the 21 applicant had undertaken (Two Renton Place was then under 22 construction) and planned for the site (i .e. , the current Three 23 Renton Place proposal) ; (2) the applicant did not previously 24 file a rezone and the project now is subject to the new site 25 APPLICANT' S SUBMITTAL - 2 DAVIS WRIGHT&JONES 3 8 5 3 G LAW OFFICES A PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS 2600 CENTURY SQUARE.1501 FOURTH AVENUE SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 9810I-1688 (206)622-3150 1 plan approval procedures which became effective on April 16, 2 1986; and (3) the applicant has negotiated and committed to the 3 Boeing Commercial Airplane Company for occupancy of the nearly 4 completed Two Renton Place building and the proposed Three 5 Renton Place building. 6 D. Coordination of Rezone and Site Plan Hearings . 7 The rezone hearing of April 29, 1986, will be followed by 8 the site plan hearing before the examiner on May 6, 1986 . The 9 applicant conferred with city officials and the city attorney,; 10 about the method to phase in the new site plan requirements in 11 circumstances where public, notice had already been given and ' 12 the rezone hearing scheduled for April 29 . Rather than have a 13 combined hearing, it was concluded that the rezone hearing 14 could proceed as scheduled, with the site plan hearing one week 15 later on May 6, for several reasons : (1) the rezone hearing 16 was set prior to adoption of the site plan ordinance, (2) the 17 site plan ordinance provides for combined hearings in normal 18 circumstances where the rezone would be applied for after the 19 effective date of the ordinance; environmental mitigation for a 20 specific project, such as the office building proposed, would 21 be addressed as part of the site plan approval for a specific 22 project rather than at the rezone phase; and (3) rezone 23 procedure necessarily requires the city council action by 24 25 APPLICANT' S SUBMITTAL - 3 DAVIS WRIGHT&JONES 3 8 5 3 G LAW OFFICES A PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS 2600 CENTURY SQUARE'1501 FOURTH AVENUE SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 95101.1688 (zo6)622.3150 • II 'fl 1 ordinance, whereas site plan approval does not (unless appealed 2 to the city council) . 3 Consequently, the applicant requests the hearing examiner 4 issue its decision on the rezone prior to the full 14-day 5 period and the applicant recognizes the rezone would be subject ', 6 to approval of the site plan and no permit can be issued until 7 that procedure was completed. 8 II . 9 REZONE CRITERIA ARE MET 10 Renton' s code sets forth criteria for rezones which are it 11 fully met here, including the comprehensive plan designation 12 for Commercial use, the surrounding consistent development and 13 the inappropriateness of the H-1 and G-1 zoning for this site. 14 The staff report also analyzes _the rezoning criteria, concludes 15 they are all met, and recommends the rezone (pp.2-3) . We 16 concur in that analysis . 17 A. The Comprehensive Plan Classifies the Area 1 for the Proposed Zone. 18 The city code requires certain circumstances to exist prior 19 to a rezone. Renton City Code 4-3014 (C) (1) (b) . Here, the 20 Comprehensive Plan classifies this site for the proposed zone 21 being requested, i .e. , B-1 is fully consistent and implements 22 the Comprehensive Plan map (see attached) ) and policies for Commercial uses . 24 25 APPLICANT' S SUBMITTAL - 4 DAVIS WRIGHT 61 JONES 3 8 5 3 G LAW OFFICES A PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS 2600 CENTURY SQUARE' 1501 FOURTH AVENUE SEATTLE,WXIASHINGTON 98101.1688 (206)622.31j0 1 The adopted Comprehensive Plan, which incorporates the 2 Central Renton plan adopted by Ordinance 3712 on March 9 , 1983 , 3 designates this site as "Commercial . " The comprehensive plan 4 map itself reflects the applicability of the commercial 5 policies to this site. Also, the text of the comprehensive 6 plan fully justifies the rezoning to B-1. The Central Renton 7 plan contained "Implementing Policies" which explained the 8 mapped land use designations . Those policies described the 9 mapping for "Commercial" (which applies to our site) as follows : 10 An area intended for retail activities, shopping centers, office uses, personal and 11 professional service amenities, non-industrial wholesale, mixed commercial, 12 residential uses and similar compatible uses . 13 Those policies further encourage intense commercial use 14 adjacent to major arterials and near other nonresidential uses 15 (both of which apply here) . 16 In addition to the Central Renton plan' s Implementing 17 Policies, the general commercial goals set out in the 18 Comprehensive Plan support this rezone: 19 V.A. Commercial Policies : 20 1. Commercial zoning should only be allowed to the extent of short term needs . 21 22 3 . To improve access, planned 23 clusters of commercial development should be encouraged, and commercial strip areas 24 should be discouraged. 25 APPLICANT' S SUBMITTAL - 5 3 8 5 3 G DAVIS WRIGHT&JONES LAW OFFICES A PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS 2600 CENTURY SQUARE•1501 FOURTH AVENUE SEATILE,WASHINGTON 9810E-1688 (206)622.3150 1 4 . Commercial areas should be located and designed to minimize travel and 2 congestion and to promote safety. 3 5 . Sufficient access, circulation, walkways and off-street parking and loading 4 should be provided by commercial development . 5 . . . 6 7. Commercial areas should be compatible with adjacent land uses . I� 7 8 9 . A variety of goods and services 9 should be available in each commercial area. 10 10 . Various uses within a commercial area should be compatible with each other. 11 11. Joint parking facilities should be 12 encouraged. 13 Renton Comprehensive Plan Commercial Policies, V.A. (pp. 16-17) . , 14 This rezone will promote the policies listed above. It is 15 a large planned commercial area with adjacent retail uses, 16 office uses and entertainment uses . There will be joint 17 parking facilities along with access and internal roadways to i8 provide for appropriate circulation. Likewise, this zoning is necessary y and appropriate for immediate needs as reflected by 20 the demand and full occupancy slated for the two office 21 buildings to be located on the site. 22 B. Rezone Is In Public Interest. 'I 23 The public interest in appropriate, compatible land uses is , 24 embodied in these Comprehensive Plan p policies and map which 25 APPLICANT' S SUBMITTAL - 6 DAVIS WRIGHT 6z JONES 3 8 5 3 G LAW OFFICES A PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS 2600 CENTURY SQUARE'150i FOURTH AVENUE SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98i0I.1688 (zo6)622-3I5o - - i 1 call for this site to be business use. In contrast, the public 2 interest is not served by the existing H-1 and G-1 zoning. 3 Neither the heavy industrial uses of H-1 nor the low density 4 single family residential of G-1 are consistent with the 5 City' s Comprehensive Plan or existing development. 6 C. Substantial Property Rights of Petitioner. 7 As stated above, the owner presented to the City in 1978 an 8 overall plan of development and since then has been 9 consistently implementing that plan. This is a phased, 10 coordinated project which has required substantial investments 11 in site development which constitute property rights of 12 petitioner. The owner not only has constructed office '.I 13 buildings, cinemas and retail shopping, but the infrastructure .i 14 and utilities have been installed with the completion of all 15 development phases in mind. For example, in 1982 oversized 16 draining facilities (72" pipe and 60" pipe) were installed on 17 this site to accommodate the office buildings now to be located '1 18 within the rezone site. Likewise, we installed a 24" water 19 main with a "T" stub in the vicinity of the proposed Three 20 Renton Place project. Further, we have installed coaxial cable 21 linking all of the buildings . As shown in the building plans ' I 22 submitted to the City for One Renton Place, conduits for 23 coaxial cable were run to the access road (terminating in a 24 manhole) for linkage to the then-future construction of Two 25 I , APPLICANT' S SUBMITTAL - 7 DAVIS WRIGHT&JONES 3 8 5 3 G LAW OFFICES A PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS 2600 CENTURI SQUARE'1501 FOURTH A\'ENUE SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 95101-1688 (206)622-3150 1. Renton Place. Likewise, as shown on the building plans 2 submitted for Two Renton Place, coaxial cable conduits were run ' 3 to a manhole just across the street from the previously 4 installed conduits . Additional conduits are being installed 5 running from Two Renton Place to the edge of the site for the 6 Three Renton Place building. To provide further linkage, six 7 more conduits to expand communications linkage are being 8 installed for One, Two and Three Renton Place Buildings . it 9 Roadway improvements also were staged, with the City' s 10 approval, to take into account internal roadway systems and to :I 11 II avoid the necessity of replacing roadway improvements for 12 subsequent phases of the development. 13 All of these installations and expenditures by the 14 applicant constitute substantial property rights and further 15 support the requested B-1 rezone. 16 D. No Material Detriment to the Public Welfare or Other Properties. 17 18 The rezone will not be materially detrimental to the public "I welfare nor other properties . In fact, development under the ' 19 current H-1 and G-1 zoning would be a material detriment . 20 The proposed rezone is consistent with surrounding uses on 21 adjoining properties . The site is bounded by major arterials 22 ;i on the north and east and by I-405 on the south. Across Talbot 23 24 Road on the east, Puget Power owns property which is designated 25 APPLICANT' S SUBMITTAL - 8 DAVIS WRIGHT&.JONES 3 8 5 3 G LAW OFFICES A PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS 2600 CENTURY SQUARE'1501 FOURTH AVENUE SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98101-1688 (206)622-3150 1 "Office/Office Park" on the Comprehensive plan. South Grady 2 Way is the north boundary of the site. To the north of Grady 3 Way again is property owned by Puget Power which is designated 4 "Commercial" under the Comprehensive Plan. Moving westward I 5 from Puget Power ' s property on South Grady is the Metro Park 6 and Ride and Sound Ford. To the west of the site is the 7 remainder of the applicant ' s development consisting of hotel, I 8 retail, office and entertainment uses and is designated 9 "Commercial . " 10 In sum, the rezone will not be a material detriment to the '' 11 public welfare or other properties, but rather will enhance and 1 12 be fully consistent with surrounding properties and the planned 13 uses as reflected in the City' s Comprehensive Plan. 14 E. Rezone in Harmony with Comprehensive Plan. 15 As discussed in Sections A and D above, the rezone will 16 implement the Comprehensive Plan' s "Commercial" designation for i 17 this site and therefore satisfies the Code requirement that it 18 be in harmony with the purposes and effect of the Comprehensive I 19 Plan. 20 F. Rezone of B-1 of Adjoining Property. 21 The appropriateness of B-1 zoning for this site is further 22 reflected in the rezone granted on the adjoining property owned I 23 by Puget Power for its electrical distribution substation. 24 That rezone was granted from H-1 to B-1 in 1984 under City file 25 number R-010-84 . 1 APPLICANT' S SUBMITTAL - 9 DAVIS WRIGHT& JONES 3 8 5 3 G LAW OFFICES A PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS 2600 CENTURY SQUARE'1502 FOURTH AVENUE I SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98101.1688 (206)622-3150 1 III . 2 SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS 3 The applicant has submitted various studies and documents \ 4 as part of its rezone application demonstrating the 5 appropriateness of the proposed B-1 zoning for office use, 6 including: 7 1. Environmental Checklist with attachments including: 8 Three Renton Place office building 9 traffic analysis (by CH2M Hill dated February 19 , 1986) . I, 10 Geotechnical investigation (Geo 11 Engineers) 12 Report of supplemental soils investigation, proposed drainage (Geo 13 Engineers 5/19/82) 14 Report of supplemental geotechnical engineering services, storm drain at 15 Puget Power Substation (Geo Engineers 7/16/82) 16 Photographs of existing and proposed 17 development 18 Data from Puget Power rezone for Renton switching station 19 2 . Site Survey (CH2M Hill) 20 3 . Site Development Plan (CH2M Hill) 21 4 . Property legal description and 22 confirming title report 23 The applicant requests all of the documents submitted with the 24 application be made part of the hearing record for this 25 APPLICANT' S SUBMITTAL - 10 DAVIS WRIGHT&.JONES 3 8 5 3 G LAW OFFICES A PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS 2600 CENTURY SQUARE'150I FOURTH AVENUE SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 96101-1688 (zo6)622•3150 1 rezone. (A copy of the list of rezone attachments and 2 Environmental Checklist attachments are attached hereto for the 3 examiner ' s convenience. ) �I 4 As stated above, the applicant has submitted an application 5 for a site plan approval for the Three Renton Place project . 'A 6 mitigated DNS has been published for that project (copy 7 attached) , which DNS is requested by considered as part of the 8 hearing record for the rezone. At the site plan hearing, the 9 applicant will present evidence with regard to environmental 1 10 mitigation which is part of the proposal for drainage, traffics! 11 and parks and recreation. 12 IV. 13 EXPEDITED REZONE DECISION REQUESTED 14 As explained in the Background (Section I .C. ) above, Renton 15 Village Co . entered into commitments prior to adoption of the 1 16 new site plan ordinance and had believed an area-wide rezone 17 had previously reclassified the site to B-1 . The owner 18 recognizes the need to comply fully with the regulations 19 applicable to both the rezone and site plan approval 20 decisions . Because of the circumstances and timing commitments ' 21 made to Boeing, the owner respectfully requests, to the extent 22 possible, an expedited decision before the full 14-day period 23 to the extent possible. An early decision on the rezone is 24 requested since it requires City Council action by ordinance, 25 APPLICANT' S SUBMITTAL - 11 DAVIS WRIGHT&JONES 3 8 5 3 G LAW OFFICES A PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS I 2600 CENTURY SQUARE'150I FOURTH AVENUE SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 9810i-1688 (206)622-3150 1 whereas site plan approval scheduled for hearing May 6 does not 1,1 2 (unless there is an appeal to City Council) . The (rezone would 3 be subject to approval of the site plan and no permits could 4 issue until that procedure was completed. The site plan 5 approval deals with the specific project impacts and conditions 6 such as access, layout and landscaping. Having the time 7 periods for the City Council ' s review of the rezone could begin 8 while the site plan decision is being made by the examiner. 9 V. 10 CONCLUSION 11 The applicant requests the hearing examiner enter findings 12 and conclusions and a recommendation to the City Council for 13 the site to be reclassified to B-1 from H-1 and G-1. Arki 14 DATED this 2� day of , 1986 . 15 DAVIS, WRIGHT, TODD, RIESE & JONES Attorneys for Applicant Renton 16 Village Company 17 18 BY a0.441/4dP Thomas A. Goeltz 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 APPLICANT' S SUBMITTAL - 12 3 8 5 3 G DAVIS WRIGHT&JONES LAW OFFICES A PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS 2600 CENTURY SQUARE•150I FOURTH AVENUE SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 9810D1688 (206)6221150 1 __ II. • 1 ' SE LAND USE ELEMENT •• ... i ) . • ... ! - 1. I Single Family Commercial ,.. , • . . • - • • 4i 1 4 .:.:.•'. ...ST 7 Low DeMultiFamily nsity 1 Office / Office Park , . :' . •••••• •• ..... 1.11 A1. 11 111.116 • - • 'in --v...• II.N;; . . •§Sk 0. - Alla .4 . • I ' . a iiE ._ • .. '1111'.4 . Medium Density ,- . .:::.::::::::::::::::IiiiiN r AlfliiiAllo::::::::: :::::::04:00:00: Public/Quasi-Public ]•:i].i::::ii•i:i::i.:::i Multi-Fa ! ::, ... ,..,.....•*::i* ........... .0.00- '•:Ksi,:.:' , 1t. .,.. ..4 wm im , i ."' High Density Light Industrial Recreation • • Heavy Industrial •AMINIF? . ir-: ' * • • - 1 v •.;: ,-,.i, Greenbelt --:-:----- Manufacturing Park di,/ ", ..<.: • / Multiple Option , I • \1' ti; - !.5.:.:7.. .;,. 1..., : 1••••..1 iliksik:••--tzfre,,,......,..64..,$.4." 017 :"•:!...;.:.. ...7:;-.'...:7.. .t.,..Z.:1.4 Vow , ,.•.______, Revised April 1985 •( %,,,, iiefail ...ii % i, ''''.'•---it ,• ',..s.:Villill''.. 1*P6AIM .4.4.1.‘ r 11 A I •-` Y . % . .'• _ ... .;,. 0 1"""........N LAKE !..t .V• 1 _. / v4; 4 . 3 •)!, , '• I. t \ 1•': .1 IV &1`'• WASHINGTON 1IIIU ._, • • , \icillin -I- i • ISO II- • •4 % • • • •w i OP %II,.0.'N -.‘`14, iiii . . 1 o - bib • • •--, k....i . • _._. - • • - r,.....„ ,.„,..,.. ::,,.... gi.E • • • • • • •. , \--2.7. 4r......._ _ • mIrIII.Mm.Mr.Ier.:. ,.-•.•--•-•-:••. id . i a g - . .•.•"•.:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:*.*•*.,-.•• -, . \ ..,0• Ait • • • • • • • • • %V '. , • • • • • • • • • 5 SVT -- 0 mi '. ',<7. 1,5 1104110111q E imi:ig;::......11;ggggg g:ii ••••••• ••••••• • e• e•e• -i i ANNIVE . ••innris 11C i'M:•,?g?:MEM 1.ggigig Ki:v..1 .0,0• •• 0, ••••••• ••• ••••• aim Miii.. • 11:0000400.As . .• • • • • • • • \.: WM 6 .100- 011111.n..it.:;:4"g°°°: •114."'VA, • • • • • • • • • AIM lira "I" Ill A 'i\i•gn°g,4133C.tr... • • • • • • • • • • • li ....11111111,ni,..., i&L.1110.1.11.1 • • ti.°K.C. • • • • • • .1‘ tr:4: ityi.l.. )11 •,0,,,0,, 0 0:...„, . . . ___ -.-..r. • • • • • • • • • 11111111;t7t1m===11 !I' ° : . Or° •lii: • . . • . • , • • • • \ L •:„;0: ‘ "1 4 •:.?„,... /"NA!.0.00:.g000.,u,..,""' ,1\ :ggg g gg:i. -.•.•.• 1 PO:2):.•o011 111.1114.c.••,.. '°go o ogo.*. , • • •i 1 • • • 1 • • • • • • • 1,e...k , 4.. ;:og og.u4s e • • _ ___z. I • • • • • -.,. • • • • • ir • ii10 '\11.1.1 0 • • .1:,:;g00 g g°g•/..1.• • • ' essi• • • • • r.„ . .6- ,E„t;.,,,, , It_...,,,.. ::\.gg:,g,,...44 . • • :::, • • • • • 0. f,„,.,,, :, ...gog000gog.0:4 • • p __.=__..E 1 We 'eV I lar EN -':ogrogo;si,• • • - i .4 40,6,,,,,w, .._. al i • if.„gc. ,,,,gogo:„:.,....,jalpii 1..„,„!.,:?...... 4,;1 ellit • .......--• tliedie 1,1V.,. ..,:i -4111 • "VI •'''1 4, 0 0 0 ogog• 14'Sg;g;•1 .111 '' /11 k Ili .igE, 1**.Vmggg7.'--Ensii;i$1 csIg"ii 411\;,1 .. 0000 000,„..r,,,,gg•,,,,v •Mt 4 o, iit_ . •..I "IF, igsigi:igigis,;••,,,*? :o., :LIM::::.11 in€6,4.0 4.7 \., v .•PO;01lattip•aopc.c0000• 1 ..o0o0o00, .0_ , 0 III • I I :tojalordbors' oli'1/44; 144M os IM "8' . '.816.111111 '.IIIIIIIIIIIIW Vlirs.'Tait t1111.!!!.'11*1"411F7• .i.17ks 11:84 :'' ) 7Atir '0 04: \ '‘';V•;•'•;:•i3•,;‘'‘t, '.)`•';'' ‘1&- 4I,, --- lart..... ..-..000WE•••14.13'IJ•',',o,:,o;o'r; li•••••IV:111Ib 11r.; %VONT din= •0•OgOgO°0°0 V-11!NU'. 4 4: ,. 7 0 ag'legal gog0000020g0 1 gm eggiifie;.*4. / /. lk , In •000. •000 / •••°' , Ms cm. ?ogogogogog ..••••....... N.; \ ''',1 ,`/".:: ;1°,4,N•iimh,,,,...r........, 1 k , #1:::!!!1,. .i.:::::1;;;:rd..:4,4, //tolgo,. .i'i. .•-,.It i :- ‘s., .,-; ,..:mmii]: ._ . .o. :,,,,,-0-0,„r.,k--., 17,741%**4' Ile lloatili --iiiiiiiiin•-:-•-.--..-;;;;;9:000r.:,, - '''`WalB1111:..,n:::•:••.,„7. 11•1111 MI •1111•111116•1 ? \ * ,:71.MMEMMi::i:::::.•V,•:,Cr,\;‘•,..`,3•••,;,,Ifigo il ar oe ;!: 7t. 7....t.i...."....•'- 2 :::.m.wii*:::.:-......,••••"",-"...:..:•?. ;: oc. .,,,, .•••• '110.:al • .::::*PNi]:::. •,;..0,,i'"; ;')e. .: •__..... C'.'.: ,‘•M tiiii:::::11!-:iiii; A , . _ .. . 1. .; ,,zi• k...m.o. •' ' l .. t. ' IV AI Ilannrar"Ba :::::: ;: :M ...:C"•,- ----= ---- "' ".•::::;::::•&!"7.771....:•:•.•...r, see• • :• .401.0. .4 , .,.\••,, .. um • ;, c• ---:-- - ---j-1-1-=-_\ ."":":::::::::iii:Iii:ii::]iiiii•::::::i:::*...• ' •••!:..0. 11-h . --__..---_,___,_,_\ ;:mi::- -4,..:,;•,.-...: • -_---_-_-_-_---__.:_::_•••••:•mii;: g. - ..., iiiri .;,.,;,. . ..,n•qi., ---„,, ___ ..`•••..:•••• :•:•:i:•:;i:• .1.0 ' 6:'",•`.:,;4...'•'•.:• •-•00.'•,.2_‘,-;;,....,1 • " ,.-.7.:.• _-/AUF49/0 '''''''----•_,!.......,.: -PM • 1 I .101 ••'•f*'•4/**r. re.:•k?,., VI'' ..4:''''*--*-• Ilk - •-4?+' ''" if(_•.-21:'''•••- ---.777,a• -=-=. W , ri..1:10/4 ., (.,•,}1,1,,..,". d\;1 %WNW i --- -------- - - -- / • •• ...' --=-:-:-=-:-:-:-.: - :- ------ . 1 -sa., ' •.v00000.0. u,g ' 1:11.::' ' . 111 . oc,c,c, ..0000.leffrAlf0- :0:07,00.9;0. -_-_-_-_-_-_-_ - _- :-=-17 ' cc ---_-:-.=-=-:- - - id- _ ' : .°.i. .,..0.; . - !.::::...: ___ 2,00.000.0000.0000000.. __ ________.=I• O . :.. Dtc:."'" , ...e.• ,\ -_-_- .•00000000000000 o o o o• _-_-_-_-_ .... " : \ --••o o o o o o o NoVocii. ---- 1.1t ,AW.;.,'C'..0 ,te,,,,,.:,•.; "•,-0.u ;:', 'r - 7055L°"%:1:1°°4 1 V ..::i:::i*:*::::::::::::::::: :":,:0•'..C7,.....t`l,••.; o, *.i.4....-:00000000.00000000.30.00000.000000000.0.000% :: -=-----,*.......f,z, a rit 1 0 r p,7(:,,, . . --,- 1 ."..• . r. .* •0000000000000 . _ .''ti iiMiniglIPPIP::'r:: h.k --- 1 \(v.. 00040.000.00000.00:0.0..... ____.:_-- ....1 A. ,..„..001 OA F.9-1VA lilk.._.._.. :41,t *i*io:::,::::::::::::,.::::.: .0;,.,,,•q - ,'.., .• 0, • ' •j; 0.. •000 ,, 0 \\ ........„.. rora...E....-........:::.:.:.:::;;:::::::::410 .7.,,,, .0.0..00.. ,.y,.• : • f•••• - -:-------,\ Nmell' AfAl ii.- .lik iiwow.mil!i.' . _. .. \',..i, .,'F7,: i,.'.). . ,---- ' '' ki.. •: '- ' • ''' •0, .w.ilik‘ il 000000, V....:.::1:i:*] -.•i .4 1 •000000.0 ( A I I.1 g t;....,II MP::1 -:: : ::::: Ati7 - =-=-=-=-: :--'-',,z .:% ..]'::..741i;:r •'''' # I- ...............•.• - Box-4--:-.=-__-:-:-.1•;-, .0.. .. .. ..„,,,a '44•Noft. PP :".•.: 1:=MR::`•••.'-::-_--:- ------_ ----:-:-:1..27, grir, :sr;0, ..:ii,,i,,::.:A.1 i 6 ,......- --- .... I.. -4.. .00000..'',.•:•:,•:•,:i•:•• • 4, ••••.i • • • 7::::. . ••••• ;; ::•:., _. - / •••••• 4•Fie 111611 "* - ?:*-- ---------- ---------I '''i' /1 st7::.""1i..00.••i..'•I'f'' I IMIlt 1,... . •.. • . . _ • . , ,, ., . 4_,....t.-, .. •• ,J44, i . _ . . .,. . , •. . - , . .,„..10-..0,0„:,•,:., , . .,7:-,.-look ,4 '-. -4 .- ''''- : 4-.: L''--: 7,... ., ,,,,, , , ,V.i..•,,N. ., .._ en' :',.,'": 1,1*:41 ' 1• .t. - ...'-'t.:O.'4....'."' '''' ' ' '` , --,,,.-.''.1 :,.•• '".1; -„ •••- '4';''1‘4it'',..•:`:-?. ', '''.'3''i.•- ' I r.5•141RMIVIkilM."177'15 77,.5-11.!..V,.„-,,,' .r.: ..,.''': ....;,..;,-,•.....,,.1 . '. •,.!'l ...:',-....-';,,i,i,l,4'7,..!_-„,:,....._`-‘,..„,-....;.:1",'' ,,,r7,77-•..; 1,..1:02, ,r...,.:.,-..' '..z, '.'ii-v.....,... '...‘,....,!...,, •., :,..1...••',•-.,N or, . ••.- ,,, . ;:::::::..;:: ! -,,,:,',....J:),,..e.‘„;,„ .--zpvv...;‘,1",.1/4.A....,4,1/4..,. -;„ , 7,..,-.-7,21.1;1,-,...„ 1..j • '.,;;,,,,i,,-i.'.,te:,,,,--; 4,..;1,',-,'. 1, ,E,...?•;;-.1.... '",, 1.,,#..4.,•.11.•,., it .:,•tt" ,t-itto,,i' k,--.___._ .. • ,-.. ... ..,. , 1.) . ..i.: 4,, ; ' iiir;,,, , ' : ; .. , ', .•• ...• k ...--= ,.- . --,'N, ..•-.N :r 4' 4 779.1171 '- '4.'4*(47'1 : 0'.' ? ` "%ri4f,-::'''''‘' ''44,4".'•-.Ii• !I 4"::00 1.1 ',.-...=s'',;44. • ' .- :. . 0'-.4.'.,.- ,,,,,, 4. ' *'.?'''t• 41' , '' -*, ,t,i'•,., !' .0 r. - • , ::..f.„,- ,;, ..iditi.,-1,...-# ,.-: If_t__-7,,,,,..,:•, .. . ....- .... ..r. v - . . .,-,..,s,..;•!,,.. • -• .. , • -: . '•,.: ... . . . 4 .pi' " - ' '''0 4,1, . l'- 4,r-T•i, •I i .lifiloi. It.•.,,••' .-.* - ------4':. '' ' ''' . . '' '•'' 't ' ' - .' '''' / -• • $f 1$•'i* it 4o,,•'. • ''''' '''''••'''''g'-•''''.'•i At ri' 1 ,"• 41, • ,.:,,,'4*- •--,‘".f.-- -- _,--v-7--•'-fz",":7----..,, .-- ..1 ,%1. ...,,, !,: -•• • A ,..,.1.,-,‘, - -, ,.. . ir, -!... - -•-,.,,..--. 1,,-,, ' • ,, ,, ' ..` ,•i4 ''•''..•••'... , 'A, 1.''',4,1,..•,. '-:•,.*".' ik'e''''*,:', ,, r '• If --*I'''''...;,• '...'‘,.... •''';.';'?...'c'-'-..- ''''''' . .1"• ,,,,,,C.i..,.... . .0-‘ . !.34."0:1‘,4,i•:;?, . ,..1,..:111,',•t •r..., , _./ i,..,. .,, - ,.• -:'' '•• '''•'•'' '..• •.#' I .ft‘:'.' ;.y ''''141, t•rt,',.i,tii'-''.1,!. , ...1.•q•,...4".•: . '''' ''''•••••":: ..... •.... ['.L •. -t•il 1-.7iA"r*”.-"i64'' L • ' '..",*t'1;7' 0 •',I •'0,f/4 , - • ‘'... .'''''. ,,.,--'- ' . ; .,“i i•;:e ^ ,'"7. • ' ---' . : ' ` '. •r.'1 ' ,-;'. i -: , •n''''. Y' '-''';•:'..••• •j1.1.4 4•' 7" '11' * . ''..:,. 1". .-.4i`f'.`.1 P.'''.'17f'Y':. -4 ' I. l'.;V i;',e,. „ -'' . ,; i., ,: - ''. "...4a4,.. - -------....;,._ u.:"- -$--!'4. 1",01.r,r,''',-I -' i!..r,..;:•'••;,• ' . :;,•'......I'A / . ' ,''-• ..", '1, '.',-744'.',,' - : ;$, J.. i . -.' -•":'A.'. 11.-11'4,8;,•,--.PJ:7:',i.'`:•• 1.. ..7.•;:" .y, ',.;17t.'d• ': , r,.t.„:. .;. ,I'i ''S'it .-4,, t •••';',,,,; litii -:-- ••••••=...-;....„ 4:.........Llit!..;,!.1 •,, ,,;.,; ..,'.. ! .. _or, „, ,..: :,,,...,. ,.., ,, , ,,. , ,.. ,;„,, ,,.. ,. i g , , fn •'. !.41..“1.. '41 .,:'. . ii 1! 1 ‘ii,,:.1.;;;t?.q1.-•-ea,,r-T,:%",,Ip.;i: ,tel.ic.i.,41;::,4,,,,,:',...,',/,,,,9.).;/' 1,:•••„,ter. ;',, 1, :,/;,,,i ' .. r---,,.- . ,i.;.;..,,,tti '1'ei, , -,7-- • '-:L 2,,,7 441r_, • :,,,'1 V''''...'.', •, , ' i ,-:,,,..tj : tit. ..;i:.•4 .,.''. T , ) • ' •A';;;'.0,„ fl'vAlf4,01."1-: ,,e':..:.:-,.:Nri,,, ,''''," .:'::I',',11k:'!,:''''''.I.'' L.4iii.-' : $ ..'• 1-,. .`:....'''''..."i:-.,,:/...' -,-,,..•.,,.„ - - '-,'.., . . ••=z1t,. t.-...,.1. - - 1 -,.c,.4'7'1'2,'.. ‘. ... :, :.• , ::. '' 4! •‘• - • - • z <- f,....,..,.: -,-/'-' ' '4 tit•I'4,-''''',4,0f.' .•/' ; 1.;;;;-.. ; ' , i ' /7‘ t74--,1y.i,....!i.. .1. ',,,‘ t4rii:4''t,,,,'"...'-' ,i.'".0'...' '' ' t '-'Al.,.._, ...'- , ' ..i.4..,,..,,,,.'-', .,, 44 '..' , ,' , '- ,t 1 . ., ,. . , • •";,.......- i' . - . ., ...• ' -. i . • , .4"4... - ,,,.. 1 ...,\ ts.,N.iir'tit,'._.,,,. N • ...„,s, ',46.. 41.• ...,.. . 1, 441.,.' t • ,,, '--f - • t 1 .' • • . -, ' . 4- '.-'. ' • (fJ . ,•• •-t •tii-_.':*:`,,.:,- , -\,. ',.-: 4 :',i if i' i A. er t-.. .-, '': .;‘`J, :,414','"' • ,-,°...-,' ,.-, :,- - / i s•-• ' " 4," :11.0'0; • t / ' k''' 41if kg, , .L., -t,,, - _.7.,.:74,- ..,, .-..„. ... ,. ..%.1, '"'..:.':. • - ', --Li,v 4_,' '' -,...i , 4 47...0 '."';',1.*:„4,4f.-4•''''i''..44 .., - - / 1...:.,,- -•e.. -.'.• 41.1 •' ' •"1.:§4.-:k - gl•.. st') ' . , ''1..!'''''s '''4`, ,I• '''•• `1`.4•., • ' ' , , i,r., -'-': ' .-.'%s...., '-,'•tit• •.. '4,,,''','.".,,,r'..:;..'.nti*-4 ' f.,.. . ' -,,,.''.," •,.',.,V.r• ,•,/- sof-, .,..i,I4f, r-.1 .r , ,... )jj . k,,, i , . • -, i„ , .. • , ' :. - ---. -• --...,,,,..,.., '. .. --1,4,4,...,, ,' . - '; . .,, 4 t b '11 i AI •,,,s •, .1 •• , .• i• 4 1 • 1,,, ' . - . " • — - Li r. 3 ...•`,:' '•,i-.• '','''' . rt.!/ ,..."-:-'-1',.. ';',2,-,-"k.`,.:10,4.tr.w Ili 1\64-: , .•, • i -,i,,,, N. ,,'''!. ja, ". ,, #1.!4,tv, ",i,-,,, - . , . .1.,',-. , . - ,„„_44.. .‘-k,,, '4. '.'...,• ' .:-41',1,....„'.4.- / .. ,,,,..itsti /. 'il;',ti r,.i 4,,,ivio,,t,„.•.'.14.Jfic,. ,. ,,,,;,,44,-;',i.• • . -, ''"'" ,.1.,1,,,,•,,.' .., . , ''7. P. 01,1 • •*,,,t • • •`' ‘,,, .,.:N•i:;'...t,,,.., -,,,IN - ":"' .---.4,,.. - -......„4 i „.'':.t44-,`.+' J ' .,• .:.',.. ' • ;-ii , ,'..ie : 4., f,'_?i..,,-'#,L, i.,. .•' 47, -, - '?.; , „ti •'. Ai/..,•,40: • .,-.- t v .,_,LP• , ,,,,,,, .wko.....40,•4 I ,. , 't ,•';. ' ,---•=1" ,',,,,.-1, '.;;t1.3.' e , t. ,•• • ,,,,,,.• \,',L .•i..t," j ...;,r-'4•1; - ,,,.. ' 14,44 0 • IV. •, •(',;.4.:,:t.,. .f',4 i co , , I ' -. ti,-,, . • - -: -• - ..'41.!"•-' •'• ' 't, 1"- '‘'`\''' ,. 'I- •,' ' .(Al ' IC ''.... ",4.02., :,, ..':',;,.1 .1.21ef; , . u_s-;. .,,,--.'. . i ir,--. i).:. 14-,4,12i1 lag AA% . L - •.44.1. '-,-',',,-!--;-Lisr, , ',. : • %.• ;,.."-4..... -....,--- -4.,_- ' u ' ' , --.• ,7111,"4,-- --, '':'!*`L,FiLL,3"- .,"..A; '\ -t., i i - . v, -,1 -- '.°•.,,. F _-•, . •4 .... ' ' ' .'' '' "" '''''' ...,1-q. 1 6-• ' ••‘''' ',; • •\‘,,:, • •S,,'.4.11. !_#.2,21,'--'-','- : ,- 4 i,Fr.,..rt ,,, ..cti,,, ,, \ ,.. • ..,',4 v _ - • --,,, ---., ..,...„..- 1 r,: , .st." .L.,. !,,t-.41•:'.::' ''•", ',„' 'i''',...,,,,)iii.)71 h. ., •\ f,,, ' 411 -,, -, , \ii• -•%1.1, i-irr,---„,a.1.10,,,,n,iiiiii,, ,-..,,,..,•,,,, us,f ,,,,' „f-4,.. • \ .7. ' ,;• ''''s,,,,,, •--.t..„,„. ..--i,tii, ,,,'..: •..x ,,,,d;r4,4,.,..41,, , i ..•,,, .1!;•-,tti 41„Ievii-, .,.. 1, ., ,;,,,N. . " - , NDI ,,,i, -, k.-..C,:.;.,!. '.;,.. - • . ' 1.# ir..,'%.1.4 .' • ' .'-.• .., ' ....i•cia•r ..-:I : , , .......,:. „,..,:.4......, ,,,,,..: ./i.'; !../.;`,t ,,,, ' \ q(i. .......• .. l' '•1 'Ir.li . •, ,. -"i•:" P,1, i., ' .."''C•N'al 741 AltAll I" t. -' '''It 4-,,,,r \ ,' •L' ,....4,'(.-,---,-4.. , y 1 • •,,,,,,,Iliry ',,I i I) /Vs.:. , •- .-'...' - 1..i .'*'' A':'•!. '- '• '' ' '''-`,..,...,,,,... - .''' ,.. .. • . ''.'" - iff";.;"7::,,,...1.1.414'. ,1 'i'-0.f4", ,,,1`, . ,' li, 4 , tk., im.,..,, . 4,4 ,/ _.. , ', .* ;1:11.•.i., ,1 1. :.°Ti'l*:, it- „ •i. .. ''. ... ' . ptc,4-•*- i _ r_Ari • .: - .. . .0,.. -,..„ , . . ; • ..:. .:,,, -,_ , ..... fi.'' :T' ., ,..,, . - - _1,11..4, ,-...-..‘-,k. ., ,, ek....71,:,01 .k.li, -• !, , :.,_, , ,.-, .,.c. ,- : 4't•-:* -- 1 , '-‘ t ''. - ' Tv-N'''''''' '- ..4-i';'''.1 .1 it ,i• ss'•' .*iik. ils•616flt,tr--'i • L'Aifit''-'1.•(''.-...•i -:', .!., i'..., /,/ : , il•1.,'• ' i. y40119,,, i lio it ., .,,,, :. ,,, . ..,. .......s.1,,,,,,,,,:.. .:-. .. . L.......!:,,-.:„! .1. - ,,,, .. -- . ,. ,,‘ ,.4,....... ..,', A . ..i4e.-. ';r e,‘:, '.i.,4,,-..''v 1, 1-0: ," \'.,,4-':.; -,t; ,:•.1:, '•• .kirjti Mty• . 1,/ 1.„.iittfl. -,':,,,,,_,,,,1 I . 1,,' . j. ., „4.1 't4', '4;',:.'1,.. '., ' ,' : 4 ,--.;.',.:l '. el. , ' i: • .,1,. 4 ., ,4„,,'f,or„4. ... ' - .r. ' 434,A. ti', 41, .tisl.f.911,,',i''• r. .4.,,...... , /, ../qh-A. k_t ,..,;.,-.;i•ii,.E.i.i-cAltril,44 "Iv 4 ...,,,,....i,--- !. ' .. - ., , . :.. •.,. , ..- ; - . ./ ., ': , ..4 • .' 'tr' Siiii'l';f4t ' :4' '31.1'"'"i• .}1 ' 'i"4.1,:l'''1'-'' : .1.-- ..-"•144..,!r7'11 k'f ' ".rii,AV'?ti. ',. :Tic IN :•,1-ii.„;-,,P7i,.- -- -- - . .-- r. ,...• 1 ' ...;.4,- r •••.,11,,,,‘ :: ... : -. ' ; - :•; - ;,.;, 1..'... L., •• yr-,Fot....„•,1:4P- . 'i '-. 1 c,•T4'i-1,.,V, '''''cv3....!'•.•-ii.1 if.,3-1..?,,,,, ?ti ttilie/Mil,c, 1',11{4.i;r• ,.. .. • .1 i.if. lc . - • ..,.i ,iir' 1 .'. ...,--s.:4-1 .: , 1 .,.`,..) - ' • , ".1,;•,,',;,; '-' ' '4,.., 'kr ' 4 *'IA '' 'lqi 11 •3' ''t .AVM ' !,:::k• .lild. , id 1.:ii I'.p'1..,/,-, ',..-• ' I . • • :,•-•,-0. ' "\ .'"./-. 4.'...r..^,•••- +' ...,-.•'.,.' ' ' . i'' t ' .• . V),'-.1- ( 1,1 /ij t kf-'1.1' i 'N "i44,5 r. I••• fi, .1,•0 .14.\:::4f a i ici, ,.. . . ..? • r ki..___— .„,,.., ‘, ..„,,,,,,,„, ..,,s., ,. , , i tif.41 t 1 1 UP:rit.i'•• I i :"...'l 27''. .%‘"•. i 1.v Z . — • if;, ‘,•', ii,..14IN.I,4 i.4:1•4?.ti r . ! ...'f'' • '14 ' '""1.to.-, .','' / I.';,''..; '''', % .Z. ',';'-:,,!,' • - i't 1,4**4::•- . ' '''' ?rNt'ib 441 iilif : k•-•"..'1. , ., .,,7„)'4 4 Pr I 4','. :4.4 f '.''6\f;., .•1•,...,,':ii•;•-''‘.f"''''‘• '• _so! ,• . • -Ozt. • 41 • \• ,-. '' it; /' .,, e'!',, -- ' .• .,1••'-•''''' 1•-•°"A'`,/.' itrisl..' '••:-'1,, ' '`Ii$ mk • lAir''' ' . Z44,- .;,0 . ;A's," VA' f 1.11e1•••,k ti. , •Aj,....• .• • i,..)i ,$:., ..,•t "f uo, , 1 . ,, . "- . --. •'..if . A li f, '1. ... "i',' ‘ '', -•lif',It 1 Ifir- - ,' 'k'', 1141 'iji A i'4,..0:;,''.1., ..,X.-, ' , '..,,,i--,-T-'4, -ti,,i , .,,'..14'' i'.:, 1g ' s - .;•., •' . • : -.,' '•Ail• ' i''. .''It';',:; ':- ' ' i' . '°'''..'• .3- ..•" .`•*1 ''' i'1i1-...",.4.1. •1..1...., „,, ,-44,, i.,11,,__.:$ '..--:' ,i, ''' .1:4,, 4,,,,kt:.,-!..,..1..... ,,,,,i ',-\.:, , ,,T,,‘,.. 0,, -., . v],.. . - ,.., , -,-,. . ,s:,..:4......zz.. ,.. i . .-51,•.. 4 1"'L.A= .4 Y 1 Ni,r' *.'.."i' e4,,,....ie kAN.1.4, '' 't . .4'.. -., A ,i1C : ' i ' ' f ' !r•i'•*.7, • t ' . '!'i•'" ' , ,i.i. +., •••4.,,, .3 , . Is!,,, i el't if'' . . •' 1: . ‘,. 1 '..,, ••'•v ''../1:, ,,,,• '17:- -,,•''...-..'1.-... 1 • - '''.1:::;! 2‘r....:',, ,•; -,._ kr- . it..A , •,•• "3' ' ..., ''•4:" it447.•.1 ' 'ill •' ..::',%1''''.'74.'.."- -' , tt."--7 "----'--..--- • ' --.4'''• ' .r '4 I tc':•• ,A. 1,.. -. , ..,..:, ,..,41,4‘,. i ' ....-_, :i.:.:ra., . ..,,. • .„,..,..Ir. , .. • ....,_...,.., ...44;.,,,, .„ ,.,... .c . ...4, ...e.,..- .., ,..,...,,.,., .. 4 • ' ••. te" '1'(4-... ."‘'. \ - I. ,-, ..' 4,1( 0- s •k., ""•-•:h4---'4`.. •' •;,1-.1. i ,''.1:,, , '‘ *,-,',,,, ..r 01. . •: :... .,-,,-,., ... .. .,„ ,. .. , 'f". .4 •,!‘;.'4,..41.-0. , '- VI t, i ''''. ..!•k•,'...;.1,,,,,''N'4\1„,,-4 ; e./., 1 i-,,,,t-ky'l 1: - ,'' -I ''' '''' '!',",li &Pt ,..' .-.;', ‘,....';').'.^.4,, ' . 11r,V.,''.4 -)1,': '-;,,,,i";rkyil:,'..,.1i: ',,p, -\• ‘.. A ,?, . . . --.', :', lvi 1 - "."-. 4 ..-.''' \.“...,1'1N •-t, , en,,,,..,.. k .' •1•••L 4 .i 4.'"`A Ilk. -'• ;,,N . tit -, ,.- ,. .,., ,.,, .irri, ...".......,„ ,, .,,,. , _ _ i 1,.„,i - :-. . , -,.:, ,,,,,...(;,,,. : .. - _ -,N - L.-' ' '..--•.-,,ot -,.', .:, ...,.....,, . , 1,,,,4 , ' - . L,/ , .•... , ..,If*, .... '' :44'''. 1 ''' k -2c4;'. ..--,`:',"!y-41I' I ,, *.''t',lei- , - .i7 1 1 - -. -• •,... 4, 4, :" 1'1 4 '''. ' • ,'• ,. \'•;,-'•;• "-" '' !y1-...\1,.. •; ''' #3c, ,t,A "4 ",, ' vitt ,, . , . • ' w',•.4,, r `•••,,.; . 3.. lek,; , t: /,:.T.,1,,„ ''' ' • i• 'or - . s., ,/ . It le/r,'"L. .., ' -f.;. ,'-;'t • .j.‘..'' , , ,-,,I.,•;t11 ..„.... -•11( '.1."41:41' 1 lq -$1 i 'tkl.e • ' !••• •'-i`• ,'-',..'!'i. ';''''''' I '''.`1:\ k' i I ic, ' ' # r • I .1% --- --- -.''''''''j ' .'4 .4) \ ., 'I' r , ' 4 _,,,. .. t,,, is.- i, v .--42,4, -.'''1.,...,‘ii., -.--14,. '1. e''IL,,..N,,41.* '-' 1. ,......i" il\;144 s',-,t: 4, v -,''',..: 't :''''.,o'h,•,...t' :•"faii'. ,4.1,,,i'!Nt',7,sitt'...,• .'- &II...4'-y)pc:' -' i , .‘•••).'t‘• ?.. ''' ''"- 's ''''''' ' f • fa.:. .. .,-b, .44, .i„,.,,,Ir ,-r-II '1*1•;,\'/' - =',411t -4 ill r'4-._.--,f,'.1.,.''' s. ' .., ' ''''.-.1.'i'l . '• ' .- '‘ ''.: • ' 1 lit' I ' ''',-.1.'",es..4-' 'I t.,, rti . ''''` 1 4 1 _.„7,,itt,',‘. ...-..: ; .t.i.:11T. -,' ,'• . - , ',• \'‘!,1"..‘'''',:;, ;' t fri ,,'iiill:i.l.. ..,(-',,,,tik•--Y•\1"+,,,,,,, k.:.,;,:‘,,,,, #21._• ill..,.,'1. ...1,;',,P1--.:\,. .::,...e.":4,..' ..: 1...,4.4::..c. .1 ,r'' ,; 4, .1.,,t,.:.•;:,.;4::,..,,,il"il;..,:ii:rwl '•,.•,11,,,, N .,.., ", ,....,:'tt ik.:14.',,:`{ '.. C:,••,' ,1- . ''' ' -141ISIV J .• •1 ,i,t e.vok. A. \,, ., ti , ,,h, . i,I.,,••• 1 41.11; 1' ;,1" 4' : .,i i i ,!, lir- ,- 1 -t y ;...;,,., , f, ,,, ,...,...,,,,ii. ..,,,:,....„;.,,,,0P9.4..,44.2,,,......Nopp**_, , , , , ,, LA,,-, '•• : . ,. '1 ,n, •04 i - , -' .. ' .. ..\,.J4i '-i 4 ..'. ,',- , - y A‘fr ,' -:•4 ,-, . i' '' t ' 1.4 '• 't' . •-' :- -, ..•-,!4 4 4 .'• .• . ,. i. ,.1 it, 1 i •-aW '' ', : ..'.,,, •' ' . i,, ',,,'-#. •••••• A__ ' - ••••;., •10.,,'',..‘ ."...f - '14, . i , of ,,,, , ( , i . , . s ' • 'ilti'''1‘' ''' f I.- .•• ..1.111.,. -- ;,„•4j..•!-i' ‘,., ,•' • , I '• i • ,, ,,.t,,,,t , .,,, ,!,;,._•.'.4,,,,,.4....!ry, ,.,.. ,4, - . • , .„ t .1 '•,-,,, ,,-, *.--,'.1,,L -. 1 '''' .i 4* ,,,ks .,t, . _i_ 44.lit .. 1 ,.„ ,,„ . -:. .:44,,'•,.., ::...';',141::.4.)..-..,.'r!.,,,,, iiieiet,,,,, .. . .,.:..,..,, ,• .,$!,,,,,,,,t,,,,;4t.e,i-:;.:, ,,,:,,cf„.:6.',-;,,,.,..,y„. 1-..,,Yt'.. .. 44,4 i;.' - ,,. ..... ., , , . .. , , ti• \ 7111 .••• .- 1.,/ , -1 -I - .` , .,,,,:t .-ai• , L,. ,::' 0.,,t,.. : -.7 • - • ,8,+' 4. ip \. : f. -,t;fiii'ilfii . --.'ijiii -,01- ./A.T. -t 4. '1/4 . '''' --,,.4 , e ,i. ,b- i -;11„, - . , • , , „ . , ,' ' , 44/. iv,i , • - .•,i,,,,,,„ , . ,, . .„„..,,, -,„, q 1,,,„.,-•, • ,,,--i • ,',, ' (6, ' 4,,, ,,, p ,„ r \ . . i., . ' .' .i• '11 '•/ ' , - firft)',1 ii V.'. '1114 . • . )14./ , fii, ., ...... -. -..„_ . A ''i.4.? 7. , 40... .,-, 1, ,f - ,iyri,,-....-,,,i-. ‘4.0 ...t.., -44;t• A 1 F . , . •'^. • - r-,, 1,-,,,,,,i1,1,/,rf,,t.,, . .--, , • .. .,-, .. ..-f,„ i f „ ., , ,..-_., i/. i,, ,,,t,, ,8*..,, ,,..,.,..,,,...... ..,,, ,ti...tit,..T.4,-,..,,,,,,,,,,, . 'i'llf,$''',/,..!! ,,cl i..,,!!. •: .:,,...........iLi,.:"..:._ .‘, ,,,,s.. '', JP,:i!..-. .- ...li•‘-`%'',A,?-fii‘....-1.,C.11•$44fi' ' )1 ,ili. ' d*?`"\' ..- l'• . tiO . . . 1•.t'•I/, '',4, „' ii' i, ft,..‘ ..14 `.', l''' ''A '-`4C. • ''- , pl, i. ,!y ..u. 6 iff'.'XL' AL:1 4., Sii• -,-. '‘ • • • • - - tk., -..t.c.., ..;." .! t 1.. •‘; 'I • . •.-.., • ' ,•. I ttl •'....-.1:--L.':,..,:i•e'l yk,i441-irt ''''It't ‘.\-ifil-: .' I. 1 ' i'. •"--'..-:-.'f'. ' • ''. • L • lb ."*,-v. ' .--1,--:.-:-....-,.. ..r.04." •, - Rezone Application List of Attachments it #/1 Property legal description (attachment 1/ I, Environmental Checklist) //2 Environmental Checklist and .attachments #/3 King County Assessor Map #/4= Site Survey (attachment #/10, Environmental Checklist) #/S Reduced Site Survey #/6 Site Development Plan, (Two and Three Renton Place Site Plan) #/7. Title Company Certification of Legal Owner, Title Report For further attachments see the Environmental Checklist and List .of" Attachments thereto. • w ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST LIST OF ATTACHMENTS ##I. Property legal description. ##2 City of Renton, Declaration of Non Significance - Renton Village Properties, dated .12/29/78 11B175. _ it ##3 Three Renton Place, Rendering. ##4 Three Renton Place, Site Plan, dated January 26, 1986. ##5 Three Renton Place, First Floor Plan. 16 Three Renton Place, Building Section, drawing Sheet A-I3. #f7 Report of Supplemental Soils Investigation, Proposed Storm Drainage, 5/19/82 - Prepared by Geo Engineers. ##8 Report of Supplemental Geotechnical Engineering Services, Storm Drain at Puget Power Substation 7/16/82 - Prepared by Geo Engineers. ##9 Color Rendering of Three Renton Place. 1110 Site survey. for Three Renton Place, Renton illage Company, Renton, Washington, February 1986 - Prepared by CH I'd4 Hill. #I I Three Renton PlFce Office Building, Traffic Analysis February 1986 - Prepared by CH M Hill. //I2 Geotechnical Investigation, February 1986 - Prepared by Geo Engineers. //13 City of Renton, Determination of Non-Significance - Two Renton Place dated, May 15, 1985. + 1101N • CITY OF RENTON ;I DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO.: ECF-028-86 APPLICATION NO(s).: SA-032-86 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for site plan approval to construct office building (III Renton Place). PROPONENT: The Callison Partnership LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Southwest corner of South Grady Way and Talbot Road South. • LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton. Building and Zoning Department. The lead agency for this:g yproposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. Additional conditions were imposed as mitigating measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-2822(D) Renton Municipal Code. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton. WA 98055 Phone: 235-2550 APPEAL: You may appeal this determination in writing to Renton Hearing Examiner no later than May 5. 1986. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. DATE OF DECISION: April 17. 1986 f PUBLICATION DATE: April 21. 1986 /Io. IC. .�.-: R nald G. Nelson .r i �. p Fer Building and Zoning Director olicy Devement . ector Richard oughton Public Works Director . I mai; of Kir , err' �� . , �'y -+ • j st ",t. ,,,...,. ,,.„ it 4,1, . . I i„I i,1'II 1 e •., • • , ,I .'Ili •, -,," '14\tr . . .... .44;fif tit, . . . . fc r.kU�� Iitz ' I �11 rze I 1 ,.. `� G • 11 rptt„ t , ,,�' � � 1 4 10*Ns. 4 oit / .........-- ii . , 4)1 t • 4 t, .. ii4°4 1 I ' \ \\,..,..... . // I . s . a f. + 1 . •%Ns ( ,:i 4V - 1 • .. ... i . ‘f \ ' \ 1 ... it, , .i IN .1 - ‘ -'s "',. , ] ' 1' r �' �Ia, • J ? • , - \,+` r f f .c - '' '!': r ,. w • f „,, , , , , • J' i ' ' I :$ .t . ,tA:, „i,.. , .,*. . , ,,, -.. „ is t r k\. ;r• 141 EXHIFIT NO. ITEM NO - dJc 1 C , . , ,,, ),,:ii, . loer/1.11".11"111111111" ,,. . ' .,. .. , , : , i 1 ioode0.00,10004/. '''. :, _ .. H ' '-'. ..J -,.. ' r 7 4z .k.M ...� a } , r s i s , ,..„,1, ._ .. . . TR �z) n "V�tl�r ' ^, .- ��� •'•y — - - ,_ i `�i!� �{ wL r�'i ��tt.Z .fF .. • ... . itrA i. d p� I ,,(` _ ,.a. 4,� � ". i f - yam,, cY _C, `X R - b s , - ,•` 1 _ 'c - .. } '�✓'< , ,.f..: ,n` ,s X i-�� ".s T`�"�3. 111 :•..:.4'„' .•' � ,, ....j^ �glf:. ;_. x *'1''.4'r�� i t w w a:MG4+ { _ .1, r - -- :-.Q, n. F• ,, ��'^,}' � 't.':t+f '�f ":Y/. f+''�-t}„'_ ._ w. 7 :. trj �' 1 -,•; ,,.%� t ,, .c• - ,,hr, i T v+9,I', I• - ��''ii�N'' '- 6 Q ',.- y o .v w. q.4I'' '1.-✓h .2+0„'., f• t J ,y ir' -R l'• i �x.�• `. 0 _. 4 /i ���{/ py !' 1. ,J .i�' r' , _.'i�4.�1y��+� •�■. d r. . -' `1 1!i ' 1•. ' ,• ` %1I!• •,. -t-0 ' n '" p. y; .j.'F -i.4. r ',;.f ,, {� iay3- .7,7, .1 y�,. ,Y l�v7•%-,?t"w .."' /,�l• ' C .i ^ fts "- •f %w7% ZZL 1•_ mar` ti ,.!'�:7 h • ram. r ke, 'i -` /L=._ , _ r��',a ., ,y. _^- ` }- _ _ - _Td�v „7 .ac - - T 7 t • f- - 1, y- pO • D _ _ ._ - —_-- I K m z $ co THREE RENTON PLACE - i 'FILE: , - • THREE RENTON PLACE OFFICE BUILDING TRAFFIC ANALYSIS February 19, 1986 CH2M HILL Attachment No. 11 -,73‘-u FEB 2 0 1986' BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. se5701rr ATTACHMENT #1 1 CONTENTS Page Introduction 1 Project Description 1 Scope of Work 1 Methodology 1 Existing Conditions 3 Street System 3 Proposed Roadway Improvements 3 Traffic Circulation 5 Future Conditions 8 Trip Generation 8 Trip Distribution 9 Mitigation Measures 17 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts 17 Conclusion 17 Appendix A. Level-of-Service Definitions, Two-Lane Roadways Appendix B. Level-of-Service Methodology ii se5701tt TABLES Page 1 Summary of Existing Level of Service 7 2 Comparison Between ITE Trip Rate and Proposed Office Trip Rate 9 3 Project Trip. Generation 9 4 Summary of Future Level of Service 16 B-1 Level of Service for Unsignalized Intersections FIGURES 1 Project Impact Area 2 2 Existing Street System 4 3 1986 Traffic Volumes 6 4 Trip Distribution Pattern 10 5 Site-Generated Trips--A.M. Peak 12 6 Site-Generated Trips--P.M. Peak 13 7 Projected 1987 Traffic Volumes Without the Proposed Project 14 8 Projected 1987 Traffic Volumes With the Proposed Project 15 iii se5701uu INTRODUCTION PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed project is a seven-story office building to be located in the Renton Village development. The site is lo- cated in the southwest quadrant of the South Grady Way and Talbot Road South intersection. Renton Village is located south of the central business district of the City of Renton. The proposed building will contain approximately 131 ,000 gross square feet on a 335, 410-square-foot site that is currently vacant. Parking for the building tenants will be "provided onsite. The parking area is proposed to consist of 667 spaces including 25 percent reserved for compacts only. Site access will be provided along Grady Way, Talbot Road, and throughout the Renton Village. SCOPE OF WORK The scope of this study included a physical inventory of the existing street system, vehicular volume counts, estimates of future-year traffic volumes, and identification of traffic- related impacts. Vehicular volumes were, forecast for the year 1987 for average weekday morning and afternoon peak hours. METHODOLOGY The prbposed development and its associated direct impact area are shown in Figure 1 . Definition of the direct impact area is based upon assessment of travel patterns accessing the project site. • Five signalized intersections, one unsignalized intersection (estimated to be relatively most impacted) , and two future site access points (A and B entrances) are also shown in Figures 1 and 2. The morning and afternoon peak-period conditions were considered in performing the analysis. Project-generated traffic volume forecasts were developed based on the 1982 edition of the "Trip Generation Manual" by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) . Future background traffic was estimated on the basis of anticipated growth in population and employment in the area. The project- related traffic was added to the background traffic to esti- mate total traffic volumes for the year 1987. Desirable improvements to the street system In the project vicinity were identified using these traffic volumes. se5701vv1 1 N Q 6 ill t ( j 2a mQ S.7TH STREET 11 1 II I . P 1 Ris2 B . - • • -- i`—��i PROJECT ' " j v i' SITE i 1001 I WAYS ��'�`���I �� , GRAp'; ; "—,ll11 I a S. ,, I o II _ --il , 1, II /J/ I • - _ I% _ ,/ II i I i • • �� =—�I )... — REUIL=1 1 I! I HOTEU `'` I III - -- , ill �r-___—__ -11 l ��`l_ —_ ---:Si ; j�;. -l1.LpGE_PL� . • ,` ` �� �`� — ^ — ____"�� ENT¢ v— 'I 1 \` 1 TH�►� 1 r _ • \teams_. . . 4;1�1�:\I 1 • ► ■ • I . • I I I I I • S. 15TH T. • I L_.-.-. ._.-. . . . •.5.-. .5.-.s. LEGEND •. Project Impact Area • Analysis Intersections _ FIGURE 1 PROJECT IMPACT AREA , 2 a4MHlu EXISTING CONDITIONS STREET SYSTEM The existing street system that serves the project site is shown in Figure 2. The major streets in the project impact area include Talbot Road South (SR 515) , South Grady Way, East Valley Freeway (SR 167) , South 15th Street/South Puget Drive, and Renton Village Place. Direct access to the proposed site area is provided along South Grady Way and Talbot Road South. South Grady Way has four lanes and provides direct east-west access to the site. Grady Way is a two-way arterial with two travel. lanes in each direction. At selected signalized intersections, left- and right-turn lanes are provided. Curb parking is prohib- ited on South Grady Way, and partial pedestrian facilities are provided on both sides of the arterial. Talbot Road South (SR 515) is adjacent to the east side of the proposed site. Talbot Road is a two-way arterial with two travel lanes in each direction and a reserved two-way left-turn lane. On-street parking is prohibited, and side- walks are provided on both sides. Renton Village Place is a two-lane, two-way road with sepa - rated left/right-turn lanes at Talbot Road South, on-street parking is prohibited on the south side, and partial side- walks exist on Renton Village Place. South 15th Street/South Puget Drive is a four-lane, two-way street with raised curbs and no sidewalks. East Valley Free- way (SR 167) is a four-lane facility that becomes Rainier Avenue South on the north leg of the intersection with South Grady Way. East Valley Freeway is a major north/south free- way stretching between Auburn and Kent on the south and the South Renton area to the north. This freeway connects to Interstate 405 (I-405) with a full cloverleaf interchange. Intersection control in the project study area is shown in Figure 2 . Traffic signals are used at all the study inter- sections with the exception of Talbot Road South at Renton Village Place and all access points to the project. These intersections are controlled by a stop sign. PROPOSED ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS The Puget Sound Council o.f Governments ' 1990 highway plan includes the following improvements near the project site. 1 .. I-405 from I-90 to SR 167. Provide exclusive transit and carpool lanes. se5701vv2 3 vi La OJ cIyu \�)2,�JaiQ 'r` ( - N 2 `l ( I( ._ _A_..- w NL.J, y`NP / ' : ,- ;__ ,lh ?\‘\ .._.-. .../4... ly / 'tt '� PROJECT ' 4 SITE ^. \ttt( u RENTON VILLAGE PL. — ,, c 10 11 r), i 1 I R qp5 0 �Nt� gZP'�E - 0 a 0 CC 0 m iii:::: J CC . ...4') i:y - -S.15TH ST. J PUGET DR.! u, . . LEGEND Travel Lane and Direction XTraffic Signal ' • I+ Stop Sign I FIGURE 2 EXISTING STREET SYSTEM 1 1 1 • CHMHIu 2. SR 169 from I-405 to SR 18 . Widen existing two- lane roadway to four-lane roadway. TRAFFIC CIRCULATION Traffic Volume Information regarding average daily traffic volumes and peak- hour volumes was collected in November 1984 , February 1985, and February 1986. Automatic traffic counts were obtained at the major intersections within the study area, and a sum- mary of the counts is shown in Figure 3. The most recent traffic counts at the intersection of Grady Way/Talbot Road have shown a significant change over the past year during the p.m. peak hour. Ten percent annual growth factor was applied to the 1984 and 1985 traffic volumes to reflect the 1986 existing conditions. The daily volumes ranged from a high of 23,750 vehicles on East Valley Freeway south of South Grady Way to a low of approximately 500 vehicles on South 15th Street west of Talbot Road South. The peak-hour volumes ranged between 1 percent and 17 percent of the daily volumes. _ During the week, the morning peak hour generally occurs be- tween 7:00 to 8 :00 a.m. , and the afternoon peak hour between . 4 :00 to 5:00 p.m. The afternoon peak hour for the proposed site is slightly varied because of the mixture of Renton Village development. The afternoon peak hour is between 4 :30 to 5:30 p.m. 41 Level of Service Level of service (LOS) is a concept developed to quantify the degree of comfort afforded to drivers as they travel through an intersection or roadway segment. The degree of comfort includes such elements as travel time, number of stops, total amount of stopped delay, and impedances caused by other vehicles. Six grades are used to denote the var- ious LOS ' s and are described in Appendix A. They range from LOS A, which represents the best condition where little or no delay is experienced, to LOS F, where extreme congestion is experienced. LOS F describes forced-flow operation at low speeds where volumes are below capacity. These condi- tions usually result from queues of vehicles backing up from II a restriction downstream of the intersection. Speeds are reduced substantially and stoppages may occur for short or long periods of time. An analysis of existing levels of service at two unsignal- ized intersections of Talbot Road/Renton Village Place and Grady Way/Access Point A and five signalized intersections-- Rainier Avenue/Grady Way, Lake Avenue/Grady Way, Shattuck Avenue/Grady Way, Talbot Road/Grady Way, and Talbot Road/ se5701vv3 5 . I . (n 1u Y r y4 °°°OJT \4 b �� (/i U lS r?00 � q OJ = ®°�J o W F- ti QW = 11�1jey0��P� 1��eb°1 N illi .4 P�� NC J o c'�c'�PO11 Q� lZ9:0) f/ (`bpol 1"o _ 1 �b n�o ��0 6690 ( ►e, �..y .. 11710) t1 tool l 0220 ' (�W n 0 0 il2►Ol r� `ltiolns .0 0 ypl Oq►^ « o o y '� e► l .. v n o n t v 9lo l 10 2201 0231t.0 �n.. (240) yIOC)" 0 CH 0Nn 0i � :0n.0 in r„ SO ° :no ona .Np4 1880 J n.wN N.ro - '� N v r N (ID) (290] 2140 C3LeD) . I} tERSTPZE 4�5 N �N °a 0 ' Cr i 0 m .C- Q Fa- , W 00� o00 1i) ^^ Nn wD } S00 7560 W (20) (1290) I JCJ: (eol _ Ii9p] QN (80) ( (120) . N (70]� (960] Q 510 5820 W o00 000 O0N nn+ LEGEND 1 xxxx Average Weekday Volumes (xxx) A.M. Peak Hour Volumes ' (xxx] P.M. Peak Hour Volumes FIGURE 3 Direction of Travel 1986 TRAFFIC VOLUMES . 6 CIOA HILL Puget Drive--indicates unsatisfactory traffic operating conditions during both the a.m. and the p.m. peak hours (LOS D or E/F) , with the exception of Grady Way/Access Point A which operated at LOS A (a.m. peak) and LOS D (p.m. peak) . For all signalized intersections, the LOS calculations are based on Webster' s formulation for the calculation of volume/capacity (v/c) ratios. The calculTted v/c ratios are then related -to LOS grades as follows : Maximum v/c Ratio LOS 0 to 60% A 61 to 70% B 71 to 80% C 81 to 90o D 91 to 100% E Over 100o F The methodology used for calculating the LOS at one-way, stop-controlled intersections is summarized in Appendix B. Table 1 SUMMARY OF EXISTING LEVEL OF SERVICE LOS (V/C) Intersection A.M. Peak P.M. Peak Rainier/Graadya E (96%) F (124%) Lake/Grad D (91%) E (94%) Shattuck/Gradya D (84%) E (94%) Talbot/Gradya E (94%) E (100%) ' � Talbot/Pugeta b F (144%) F (125%) Talbot/Renton VillagE Place E (NA) E (NA) Grady/Access Point A A (NA) D (NA) aSignalized intersection. bUnsignalized intersection. 1 F. V. Webster. Traffic Signal Settings. Road Research Technical Paper No. 39. 1961 . • 2Interim Materials on Highway Capacity. Transportation Research Board Circular No. 212 . January 1980 . se5701vv4 7 Pedestrian and Bicycle Activity Field observations indicate that pedestrian and bicycle acti- vity in the project impact area is insignificant. There are no special provisions for pedestrians besides handicap ramps at signalized intersections . No bicycle routes are desig- nated along any major arterials. Transit Service Transit service is provided near the site by Metro. Route 247 provides peak-hour service on Grady Way and five other routes (145, 148, 149 , 155, and 156) provide service on Talbot Road .I - at. the project site. The South Renton Park and Ride is op- erating on the north side of Grady Way between Lake Avenue and Shattuck Avenue. It is assumed that only 2 percent of the employees would arrive at the proposed office building by transit during the peak hour. FUTURE CONDITIONS TRIP GENERATION Trip generation rates for the proposed office building are based on ITE ' s Trip Generation, Third Edition, 1982 . The manual indicates an office building with 100,000 to 199,999 gross square feet (GSF) will generate approximately 14 .3 average weekday vehicle trip ends per 1 ,000 GSF based on an employee density of 4 . 2/1,000 GSF. The Three Renton Place building will employ 800 people in 131,000 GSF; this results in an employee density of 6. 1/1 , 000 GSF. Because of , the higher employee density at the proposed facility, the average weekday vehicle trip end rate shown in the ITE man- ual of 14 . 3/1 ,000 GSF was factored up to 20. 8/1 , 000 GSF for use in this study. Table 2 shows the comparisons of the ITE trip rate and those used in this study. -� It is estimated that the proposed facility will generate approximately 2,715 vehicle trip ends on an average weekday, 380 trip ends during the morning peak hour, and about 385 trip ends during the afternoon peak hour. The trips generated by the proposed facility during the day, morning peak hour, and afternoon peak hour.,,are summarized in Table 3. TRIP DISTRIBUTION 1 Trip distribution is the process of analyzing the influence area of the proposed project with respect to the direction and, more specifically, the route likely taken by vehicles going to and from the proposed development. The 1990 travel desire prepared by the Department of Budget and Program Plan- ning, King County (King County Interim Transportation Plan-- 1 Foc4s;' 1990) , for the Renton area was used as a basic input se5701vv5 8 ;1 for the estimation of trip distribution from the site to the adjacent arterial streets. It was assumed that once on the adjacent arterials, the vehicles would be distributed ac- cording to the existing turning-movement ratios at the inter- sections. Travel times and site access points were also taken into consideration. Table 2 COMPARISON BETWEEN ITE TRIP RATE AND PROPOSED OFFICE TRIP RATE Proposed Office ITE Trip Rate Trip Rate Building size 100,000 to 131 ,000 GSF 199 ,999 GSF Average weekday vehicle trip end rate 14 . 3/1 ,000 GSF 20. 8/1 ,000 GSF A.M. enter 12. 5% 12. 5% A.M. exit 1 . 5% • 1 . 5% P.M. enter 2'. 8% 2. 8% P.M. exit 11 .4% 11 .4% Employee density 4 .2/1 , 000 GSF 6. 1/1 , 000 GSF aFrom Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) . Trip Generation. Third Edition. 1982. Table 3 PROJECT TRIP GENERATION Daily trip generation: 2 , 725 trip ends A.M. peak-hour generation: 380 trip ends in : 340 trip ends out: 40 trip ends P.M. peak-hour generation: 385 trip ends in : 75 trip ends out: 310 trip ends Note: Rounded to the nearest five trip ends. Figure 4 identifies the estimated trip distribution pattern. This trip distribution pattern reflects the following basic assumptions. se5701vv6 9 • IL 1 Q OJ W a- �ii Q - N - sY 4 P � aFyNea(-. IFK ,S L..--1 Spl c. - N 38% 4 1v cr, (38%)—,ii 35'5 n� � ,33% chi �gZP � 6% 12% � Olt S.RZEN(7%PL(1.2%) x0 c,c3chr) os co 0 cc I 0 m J , Cictic-7\..... 2enOON > r N Q W • LEGEND I 48% A.M. Peak (45%) P.M. Peak i i FIGURE 4 TRIP DISTRIBUTION PATTERN 10 1 atMHIL1 1 . 'For new trips generated (a.m. peak-hour) by the proposed Three Renton Place building, 9& percent would access the site from the west side of the study area, 22 percent from the northeast, and 30 percent from the south side of the proposed site. 2 . During the evening peak hour, 45 percent of the total trips exiting the proposed site would use Shattuck Avenue, about 2 to 3 percent would exit at two proposed access points along Grady Way, and 38 percent would leave the site through the east entrance along Talbot Road. It is estimated that 12 percent would exit at the proposed signalized intersection of Talbot Road/Renton Village Place. Using the estimated trip distribution pattern shown in Fig- ure 4 , the traffic anticipated to be generated by the pro- posed development during the two peak hours was distributed into the street system within the study area. Figures 5 and 6 summarize the distribution of project-generated traffic. For the purposes of the traffic impact analysis, the "1987 no-build" traffic volumes assume that the proposed project will not be built. The 1987 no-build volumes are provided so that the relative magnitude of the project impacts can be understood. The "1987 build" volumes reflect the estimate of traffic generated by the proposed project. The estimated 1987 volumes for the study area are shown in Figures 7 and 8. The background volumes were increased by about 3 percent over existing 1986 conditions to reflect projected 1987 con- ditions. According to City of Renton staff, this is consist- ent with historical growth in the area. Traffic generated by Two Renton Place office building was also included into the background volumes. The result of the LOS analysis for estimated 1987 peak-hour conditions, both with and without the proposed facility, is presented in Table 4 . This tabulation indicates that the project itself causes insignificant changes in the level of service for any of the intersections studied. All inter- sections studied are expected to operate at LOS E-F with or without the building during both the morning and afternoon peak hours, with the exception of Grady Way/Access Point A. This intersection will operate at LOS A during the morning . peak hour with or without the project. Traffic leaving the site at Shattuck Avenue will pass through the commercial areas adjacent to the site. 1 se5701vv7 11 J \. tit N -' . e 11 m EAST VSLRLESY7FREEWAY 10—• R4j��FA O o m \lid. o D v o1..) v( •S 40.4, ] a a Ui w • cr. e LA AVE. S. • . —3cin,p o (115)-J (25r r'"5 SHATTUCKKE AVE,S, N Z� Nr CP 1 13 �v �, `I' 3o . cn �+ a ir co ran rn z \a '�f oo rm • � z 1, . ...\Q C7 10 C140�) TALBOT ROAD SOUTH 5 0 ). j k., L ---. ` (80) 15 o�Ly s ti� 1 15 :° 2 o `J' W Q ' Y /17" wQY I = J .9 5'GPO 2`ly P4 nu.) l y� (/ J9y I 41 v 6 r (5)�. 30, .165 ri 10 v to 1 20 �` r ? CC (5J 1 . Cal:Dra.................„ , . IN in -se ti ,��RS ' CAp5 y ' �N c a ' 0 CC 0 CO J i .j''' . ." ~.C''.. .%)u.-..,.J1a r,. 4: W^ ry } t0 �� 5 _/ ,46-50 N a 1 W tn a LEGEND 15— Inbound (25)— Outbound FIGURE 5 SITE GENERATED TRIPS • AM PEAK HOUR • 13 (wtf HILL I I v) 1 W �0o' rl*o .2. 1 t4 �� Q • � o r<0 a?BBB 6> �,4ti'o J N JBO of J o 4:47. lir 4.) 1.1.1 cc 1/1 . ( s:\.6.................„....„6-..%.1 sato - N • 00o :::.. , a x22 Can �l'' 106 q01 r� 10) 1118°1 o a n (4301 '°►0) 115" may. 0 0 0 ~ I ,1 ZO1 �0 0 0 N. 16 ^n N 1.►660 0 0 0 `0^9 t— .„ 4e+o I -- ram., n.. .[150) 25 0) N` .".� 000 ....4 (270) t ( 0 0 0 . 0 0 O N r.f fir.fl 2360 4.0, vr+N f r N N v 2620 (20) (390) i (~ te�s'iP/E q�5 rn .ICAZ:Hrp..................-"---• . �N a Q O co J C.1?kGT:).....\\....7 H-.nc 000 y.,N N o 0LL.- so In }P 530 6270 W...Ice (20) (13e0) N [80 ,, _ ( l0)~ > �1� N [70]� � ( 30 Q (90) (1040) 540 6200 la/ o00 000 1 • N 1yr.-. n 1 N N N N wt f P A v LEGEND xxxx Average Weekday Volumes (xxx) A.M. Peak Hour Volumes FIGURE 7 [xxx] P.M. Peak Hour Volumes Direction of Travel PROJECTED 1987 TRAFFIC VOLUMES WITHOUT THE PROPOSED PROJECT 14 Oaf HILL U) Y �.�a irs�mo `.o qoo /.'r (I C) .Q ,o of ,,o of q J JO J � � O W 4�°O1 ii COitii\ ''-4( 42 0 ki o p be It 0 23 650 �10z°� 0 �► pl (S) .rv~ NNa .... (25]�0) S .,o g201 \wr 200lp 13201n... \\..10 iia (IOr� ^or. �44 ) cl2l°� 1=6 .. �"=�I ono eoo 0 0 0 ` .Se3p .. ^^ n� 1100� ` `^"^^ na... i �/ 1 o00 000 oa • .-. (160] • al , al I «.00 ��« ,I ++ N 2700 (20) ;I • (tool I II Cd1:::).L............„ • • \N��aS.�ptE q05 CO c II O ' H O )0 .7.1\.....:;) J FQ- 000 H0000aaN.0 o N O ACC a v N N r^~ - . 530eseo(20) (1390](60� - . (460)• _ � i � (70] � (140) i N (100)� � (1090, Q 570 6560 W .00 coon f N« n c a 1.v..• .Nra N r . LEGEND I xxxx Average Weekday Volumes ,i ' (xxx) A.M. Peak Hour Volumes l • (xxx) P.M. Peak Hour Volumes FIGURE 8 Direction of Travel l PROJECTED 1986 TRAFFIC VOLUMES II WITH THE PROPOSED PROJECT II I 15 1 CHILLI i i :I The proposed development is not expected to have a signifi- cant adverse effect on traffic safety within the study area. j There may be a slight increase in the annual number of acci- I dents, but this will be due more to an increase in the amount of exposure than to an increase in the risk associated with each exposure. J Table 4 SUMMARY OF FUTURE LEVEL OF SERVICE (percent saturation) A.M. Peak P.M. Peak II 1986 1986 1986 1986 Intersection No Build Build No Build Build Rainier/GrRdya F (101%) F (102%) ' F (128%) F (134%) ; Lake/Grady E (93%) E (93%) E (95%) E (95%) • Shattuck/Gradya E (92%) E (94%) E (95%) E (97%) Talbot/Gradya E (95%) E (95%) F (102%) F (105%) jl Talbot/Pugeta F (154%) F (160%) F (128%) F (133%) , Talbot/Renton Placeb E (NA) . E (NA) F (NA) F (NA) Talbot/Renton Placebb C (74%) C (77%) E (94%) E (97%) ;1 Grady/Access Point A A (NA) A (NA) E (NA) E (NA) Talbot/Access Point Bb NA E (NA) NA E (NA) a Signalized intersection. bUnsignalized intersection. 1 1 cWith proposed signal. 1 I Impact on transit, bicycles, and pedestrian travel is not I expected to be significant because of the current low level j of travel by these modes. j A traffic signal warrant analysis performed for the inter- 1 section of Talbot Road South and Renton Village Place indi- 1 cates that a signal would be warranted (Warrant 1 and 2-- Minimum Vehicular Volume and Interruption of Continuous Traffic, Manual of Traffic Signal Design, ITE, 1982) under the existing traffic conditions. ' a An analysis of the future levels of service at the proposed signalized intersection of Talbot Road/Renton Village Place is also presented in Table 4 . The proposed signal would im- prove the level of service to LOS C during the a.m. peak 1 • hour, but would be at LOS E during the p.m. peak hour under yi both-build and no-build conditions. ,1 . I se5701vv8 16 I • MITIGATION MEASURES To ensure safe and efficient movement of traffic and pedes- trians within the study area, the following traffic- opera- tional improvements are proposed. o Access Point B--approaching movement to Talbot Road South should consist of a separate right-turn lane and a left-turn lane. o Install -a traffic signal on Talbot Road at Renton Village Place. The installation should include an interconnect with the existing signals at Talbot Road/Grady Way and Talbot Road/Puget Drive. o Provide speed-limit signing within Renton Village. o Establishment of a carpool/vanpool program should encourage employees at the proposed site to use !, this alternative rather than single-occupant vehicles for their work trips. The proposed development is expected to be used by The Boeing Company. Boeing encourages the use of carpool/ vanpool programs. UNAVOIDABLE ADVERSE IMPACTS o The proposal will cause a slight increase in traffic on surrounding streets. o The increased traffic will increase the degree of satu- ration by approximately 1 to 6 percent at surrounding intersections. o The traffic generated by the proposal will contribute to the need to provide transportation improvements in the area. CONCLUSION The proposed site would add some 380 new morning peak-hour trips and 385 afternoon peak-hour trips, amounting to an approximate 3 percent increase in total approaches at each intersection within the impact area. Construction of the proposed site would not change the level of service at any of the intersections in the impact study area; however, the degree of saturation would increase slightly at several locations. Based on the results of the traffic-impact analysis shown in this study, the proposed Three Renton Place office building can be developed with minimal impacts on the existing street system and traffic operations. se5701vv9 17 APPENDIX A LEVEL-OF-SERVICE DEFINITIONS TWO-LANE ROADWAYS Level of g� Service Characteristics A Operating speeds at or near the posted speed limit. Little or no intersection delay. B Operating speeds approaching the posted speed limit. Some delay at intersections because of turning movements. C Operating speeds may be reduced because of conflicts with other vehicles. Intersection delay will increase, particularly for left- turn movements or crossing traffic at unsig- nalized intersections. D Approaching unstable flow. Operating speeds may vary .considerably. Conflicts with turn- ing vehicles may cause slowdowns or occa- sional stoppages. Considerable delay can be expected at intersections for vehicles wish- ing to cross the main traffic flow. E Unstable flow. Operating speeds will vary from 15 mph to 30 mph. Occasional stoppages can be expected because of conflicts with turning movements. Significant delay will be '! experienced by traffic at intersections • attempting to cross the main traffic flow. F Forced congested flow with unpredictable characteristics. Typical operating speed below 15 mph. Source: A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets. 1984 . se5701ww1 • • APPENDIX. B ;i LEVEL-OF-SERVICE METHODOLOGY UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS LOS The methodology used for calculating the LOS at one-way and two-way, stop-controlled intersections is based on informa- tion contained in Transportation Research Board Circular 212, Interim Materials . on Highway Capacity (January 1980) . For these nonsignalized intersections, LOS is defined differ- ently from that for signalized intersections in that it is based upon the concept of "reserve capacity. " Specifically, the definition shown in the table below has been recommended for use. The reserve-capacity concept applied only to an individual traffic movement (or shared-lane movement) . Once the capacity of all the individual movements has been calcu- lated and their LOS and expected delay determined, an over- all evaluation of the intersection can be made. Normally, the movement with the worst LOS defines the overall evalua- tion, but this may be tempered by engineering judgment. This is particularly true in cases where the most critical movement serves a very minor percentage of the total traffic entering the intersection. Past experience with the unsig- nalized analysis procedures indicates that this methodology is very conservative and that it tends to overestimate the magnitude of any potential problems that might exist. Therefore, the result of any unsignalized intersection analysis should be reviewed with this thought in mind. Table B-1 LEVEL OF SERVICE FOR UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Level of Reserve • Service Capacity Expected Traffic Delay A 400 or more Little or no delay B 300 to 399 Short traffic delays C 200 to 299 Average traffic delays D 100 to 199 Long traffic delays E 0 to 99 Very long traffic delays F Less than 0 Failure; extreme congestion • se5701xx1 . k . i - - FILE: R-016-86- . • . 1 \ I 1 . . -- - - . . - . i . I . .. . i . . I , . i i 1 1 1 1 . .,.. . • . 1 1 I • 1 ,-- . . 1 i • . , 1 . , . . , . . I 1 : , . . . , . . . , , . ‘• ..../Aare. ‘,-witioe '.. k,i: f .'" , . .-•''' ',`7.1 1 - \ • A H:... A"'-' ' ...1 ...') A, \A ,i 'A 4, ',-.:. e, ,,—+ %',--, ;., • 1,,',.i :,:i "I 1 •\ GeoEnginees .._ TEB 2 0 1986 ,1 --------i- Incorporated , i Engineers and Geologists Consulting Geotechntcal ', . BUILDiNG/ZONING DEPT. • 12. Arr AcHtAgisfr 4: PRELIMINARY DESIGN MEMORANDUM • GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES THREE RENTON PLACE RENTON, WASHINGTON FOR • RENTON VILLAGE COMPANY EE - -0 R. (ler) Dim _ .e® j FEB 1i19i986 FEB 2 01986 �� BUiL.DiNG/?Q1iMG DEPT THE CALE.ISUiv PART Sr;1;' GeoEngineers Incorporated 4400 %NO GeoEngineers Incorporated (206)746-5200 P.O.Box6325 Consulting Geotechnical 2405-140th Ave.N.E. Bellevue,WA 98008 Engineers and Geologists February 19, 1986 Renton Village Company Evergreen Building Renton, Washington 98055 Attention: Mr. Everett Johnson Gentlemen: Preliminary Design Memorandum Geotechnical Engineering Services Three Renton Place Renton, Washington File No. 344-08 Pertinent preliminary geotechnical design information for the project is summarized in this memorandum. Subsurface Conditions: Subsurface conditions in the proposed building area have been defined by examining the logs of previous borings and by drilling three new borings to depths of 83.5 to 111.5 feet., Borings 1 and 2 of the new explorations are located about 45 feet north of the proposed northeast and northwest building corners, respectively. Boring 3 is located ' about midway along the south edge of the proposed building. Preliminary logs of the new borings, along with descriptions of the soil classification system and boring log symbols, are attached (Figures 1 through 11). The borings encountered a complex sequence of interbedded silts, organic silts, peat, sand and gravel overlying bedrock. In general, deposits of soft or loose organic silt, peat, silt and silty sand are present from the surface to depths ranging from 12 to 20 feet. These upper deposits are underlain by loose to medium dense fine sand and silty sand to a depth of approximately 40 feet. Traces of peat and occasional layers of soft silt are present within the sand. Between 40 and 60 feet, the borings encountered interbedded deposits of loose to medium dense sand and silty sand with occasional layers of dense gravel and soft organic silt and peat. Deposits Renton Village Company February 19, 1986 Page Two of medium dense to very dense sand and silty sand with occasional layers of very stiff silt are present from a depth of approximately 60 feet to bedrock. Siltstone bedrock was encountered in Borings 1 and 3 at depths of 104 and 80 feet, respectively. Boring 2 encountered sandstone bedrock at a depth of 96 feet. Ground water was encountered in all of the borings at depths ranging from 7 to 11 feet. Foundation and Slab Support Options: We expect that the new building will have similar loads to the Two Renton Place office building. We recommend that the structure and the lower floor slab be supported on piling. We have considered the following options regarding pile support: 1. Support the structure and floor on friction piles. 2. Support the structure on piles bearing on bedrock and the floor on friction piles. 3. Support the ' structure on piles bearing on bedrock and the floor on-grade or on piles bearing on bedrock. We recommend that either Option 2 or 3 be used. Option 1 has the disadvantage that significant (1 to 2 inches) settlement could result under large pile groups. We have considered the use of 12-, 14-, and 16-inch-diameter augercast and 18-inch prestressed concrete piles. Steel piles are also technically feasible; however, the corrosion potential of the site may be inhibitive for steel piles. Based on our preliminary analyses, we expect that capacities on the � I • order of 20 to 40 tons can be developed for frictional piles installed to depths of about 30 to 60 feet, depending on the diameter of pile selected. The recommended allowable design capacities for augercast or prestressed concrete piles supported on sound bedrock is 50, 65, 90, and 110 tons, respectively, for 12-, 14-, 16-, and 18-inch-diameter piles. We recommend that the piles be spaced a minimum of 3 diameters apart. Normal pile installation procedures are anticipated. Piles bearing on bedrock should be drilled or driven into the rock until practical refusal is encountered. GeoEngineers Incorporated I ` i Renton Village Company February 19, 1986 Page Three Floor Slab Support: We recommend that the lower floor slab be supported on-grade if only minor fill is to be placed in the building area. Otherwise, the floor should be supported on piles because of the potential for differ- ential ential settlement, both across the floor slab and between the slab and building frame. To protect the slab from dampness, we recommend that a 6-inch blanket of coarse sand or gravel with a vapor barrier be placed beneath the slab. Site Preparation and Filling: Surface vegetation and rubble should be ' removed from the building and parking areas prior to filling. Existing foundations can be left in place; however, pedestals which extend above the existing ground surface should be removed. Prior to filling in the parking area, a woven geotextile should be placed over the ground. Fill in the building areas need only be compacted 'I to support construction equipment. In the parking areas, the fill should be compacted. to 90 percent of the maximum dry density according to ASTM D-1557. The upper 2 feet below subgrade should be compacted to 95 percent. We understand that the site grades will be raised 3 to 4 feet. If earthwork is done during wet weather, the fill should consist of clean sand and gravel containing less than 5 percent fines. If fill is placed during extended periods of dry weather, the fines content can be increased somewhat. Settlements of 2 to 3 inches are expected from the influence of filling over the site. To limit differential settlements in areas where foundations are left in place, we recommend that this fill be reinforced with layers of geotextile. Placement of the pavement section should be delayed as long as practical to minimize postconstruction settlements. Entries: Steps and side walks on the outside of the structure are expected to experience long-term settlements on the order of 2 to 3 inches in areas where 3 to 4 feet of fill is to be placed. Elsewhere, settlements will be proportionately smaller. We recommend that this settlement be considered in the design of sidewalks and entries to the building. 0 0 o - GeoEngineers Incorporated Renton Village Company February 19, 1986 Page Four Laboratory tests on soil samples obtained from the borings are underway and will be complete within about one week. A detailed report for the ' project will be issued thereafter. We are available to meet with you to expand on the contents of this preliminary design memorandum and provide other additional input for project design, as appropriate. ,p.'.- Yours very truly, ��SB. Th �� ,� t wAs--,�..'o00 GeoEngineers, Inc. 0../14elic/Z1446 I `' Nancy L. Tochko L., ��F�F�/STER�0 �' Staff Engineer SiONAL EN� . J ., 3 s Jam-s B. Thompson S- • or Engine r , 4 /.23„e4__ . K. Tuttle P' incipal NLT:JBT:da Three copies submitted cc: Callison Partnership (2) 1423 Third Ave, Suite 300 Seattle, WA 98101 Attn: Mr. Dail Ereckson GeoEngineers Incorporated 1 9 1 SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM GROUP i MAJOR DIVISIONS SYMBOL GROUP NAME GRAVEL CLEAN GRAVEL GW WELL—GRADED GRAVEL,FINE TO COARSE COARSE GRAVEL GRAINED GP POORLY—GRADED GRAVEL SOILS I MORE THAN 60% GRAVEL GM SILTY GRAVEL 1 OF COARSE FRACTION WITH FINES RETAINED ON NO.4 SIEVE GC CLAYEY GRAVEL MORE THAN 50% RETAINED ON SAND CLEAN SAND SW WELL—GRADED SAND, FINE TO NO. 200 SIEVE COARSE SAND t0 SP POORLY—GRADED SAND _ co c:rb\ MORE THAN 60% SAND SM SILTY SAND .—I OF COARSE FRACTION WITH FINES PASSES N NO.4 SIEVE SC CLAYEY SAND SILT AND CLAY • ML SILT tY FINE INORGANIC .. GRAINED CL CLAY I— J SOILS LIQUID LIMIT Z LESS THAN 60 ORGANIC OL ORGANIC SILT, ORGANIC CLAY SILT AND CLAY MH SILT OF HIGH PLASTICITY, ELASTIC SILT co MORE THAN 60% INORGANIC O PASSES NO. 200 I SIEVE CH CLAY OF HIGH PLASTICITY, FAT CLAY LIQUID LIMIT 60 OR MORE ORGANIC OH ORGANIC CLAY, ORGANIC SILT M HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS PT PEAT I NOTES: SOIL MOISTURE MODIFIERS: 1. Field classification is based on Dry — Absence of moisture, dusty, dry 11 visual examination of soil in general to the touch accordance with ASTM D2488-83. Moist — Damp, but no visible water 2. Soil classification using laboratory tests is based on ASTM D2487-83. Wet — Visible free water or saturated, ;i usually soil is obtained from _ !, 3. Descriptions of soil density or below water table consistency are based on - interpretation of blowcount data, visual appearance of soils, and/or rTh test data. I in !, 0 I co w C7 �/'111I` SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM ` GeoEngineers \`O Incorporated FIGURE 1 I Y I LABORATORY TESTS: SOIL GRAPH: AL Atterberg limits SM Soil Group Symbol . CP Compaction (See Note 1) - CS Consolidation DS Direct shear I Distinct contact between GS Grain—size analysis Soil Strata - HA Hydrometer analysis K Permeability Gradual Change between M Moisture content Soil Strata MD Moisture and density SP Swelling pressure - Water Level TX Triaxial compression UC Unconfined compression z Bottom of Boring rn BLOW—COUNT/SAMPLE DATA: v Blows required to drive sampler 22 1.1 Location of relatively I 12 inches or other indicated n undisturbed sample distances using300 pound hammer falling 30 inches. 12 ® Location of disturbed sample -J z "P" indicates sampler pushed with p Location of sampling attempt weight of hammer or hydraulics with no recovery of drill rig. o 10 0 Location of sample attempt , 1 using Standard Penetration Test i' t procedures n NOTES: 4 1. Soil classification system is summarized in Figure 1. 2. The reader must to the discussion in the report text as well as the exploration logs for a proper understanding of subsurface conditions. 6 a r, I co ;I 1 I m c W o GecEngineerS KEY TO BORING LOG SYMBOLS Incorporated w4R FIGURE 2 TEST DATA BORING NO. 1 `Y T co c d .- .0'� o c m o o' Group ft DESCRIPTION os a)_11. mo Go coo co Symbol 0 OL BLACK ORGANIC SILT WITH A TRACE OF PEAT, LIGHT GRAY CLAY, AND WITH COAL AND WOOD FRAGMENTS - (MEDIUM STIFF TO STIFF, MOIST) - 11 ® .- - 5— — MD 54°%0 68 5 MI ML GRAY SILT WITH STRINGERS OF FINE SAND, ORGANIC SILT, AND A TRACE OF COAL FRAGMENTS (SOFT - 10— / TO MEDIUM STIFF, WET) — - SP/ INTERBEDDED LAYERS OF GRAY FINE SAND AND FINE - ML SANDY SILT (LOOSE OR MEDIUM STIFF, WET) _ 9 - 15 _ - ML GRAY SILT WITH ORGANIC MATTER, WOOD FRAGMENTS - H AND OCCASIONAL LAYERS OF DARK BROWN PEAT 4 III (SOFT, WET) -• - —20_ - — I- SP DARK GRAY FINE SAND WITH A TRACE OF SILT AND a W WOOD FRAGMENTS (MEDIUM DENSE, WET) 0 - w MD 31% 90 19 III _ 0 25— — I N - _ d _ J MD,DS 27% 96 11 I _ z _ 30— — I r S M _ 14 SP- GRAY FINE SAND WITH SILT (MEDIUM DENSE, WET1) - SM 35-- — OL- FsROWN ORGANIC SILT WITH PEAT (SOFT, MOIST) PT - MD 73% 55 5 • _ • 40— / / Note: See Figure 2 for Explanation of Symbols -.. OS* LOG OF BORING GeoEnglneers`� Incorporated �0. FIGURE 3 TEST DATA BORING NO. 1 (CONTINUED) I « �,c 3 DESCRIPTION pp oo 5 Group 1: oo coo m Symbol 40 - GW GRAY SANDY FINE TO COARSE GRAVEL (MEDIUM DENSE, WET) - 25 ED • 45— SP GRAY FINE TO COARSE SAND WITH GRAVEL AND LENSES OF SILTY SAND (MEDIUM DENSE, WET) 26 11 - 50— — GW GRAY FINE TO COARSE SANDY GRAVEL (DENSE, WET) MD,DS 8% 131 46 ■ SP GRAY FINE TO MEDIUM SAND WITH OCCASIONAL - 55-- LENSES OF SILTY FINE SAND (DENSE, WET) — - PT DARK TO LIGHT BROWN PEAT WITH FINE SAND - • _ PARTINGS (MEDIUM STIFF, MOIST) W MD 104% 42 11 S ▪ - -60— — d - SW BROWN FINE TO COARSE SAND WITH A TRACE OF uJ SILT (MEDIUM DENSE, WET) • - 0 24 II - c. - SP-SM INTERBEDDED GRAY FINE SAND WITH SILT AND - ~ OL DARK BROWN ORGANIC SILT (MEDIUM DENSE OR J _ MD,DS 49% 67 11 III MEDIUM STIFF, MOIST) - 70— / — s ML/ DARK BROWN ORGANIC SILT AND FINE SANDY SILT OL (MEDIUM STIFF TO STIFF, MOIST) - MD 38% 81 10 • 75— - - SM GRAY SILTY FINE SAND WITH LENSES OF FINE - SANDY SILT (LOOSE TO MEDIUM DENSE, WET) 10 a - 60— Note: See Figure 2 for Explanation of Symbols �,(1�v. LOG OF BORING �� GeoEngineers Incorporated FIGURE 4 TEST DATA BORING NO. 1 (CONTINUED) w � 3 R. DESCRIPTION 0 0 T m o o fl Group �F 20 CO mV co Symbol 80 i - 19 A SP GRAY FINE TO MEDIUM SAND WITH A TRACE OF - SILT AND OCCASIONAL LENSES OF GRAY SILTY - FINE SAND (MEDIUM DENSE, WET) ' 85— — - SM GRAY SILTY FINE SAND WITH LENSES OF FINE - ML SANDY SILT (MEDIUM DENSE OR MEDIUM STIFF, 21 0 WET) 90— — - SM BLUEISH-GRAY FINE SAND WITH GRAVEL OVER GRAY ML SILT WITH A TRACE OF PEAT OVER GRAY SILTY --. 50-5" 0 FINE SAND (MEDIUM DENSE, MEDIUM STIFF, - VERY DENSE, MOIST) (RESPECTIVELY) - 95— — SM GRAY SILTY FINE SAND WITH A TRACE OF FINE I- ML GRAVEL WITH LENSES OF FINE SANDY SILT ww - 93-8�� 0 (VERY DENSE OR VERY STIFF, WET) u. - � • 100— i — a SM GRAY SILTY FINE SAND WITH A TRACE OF GRAVEL G AND OCCASIONAL FRAGMENTS OF SANDSTONE - - 30 (MEDIUM DENSE TO DENSE, MOIST) _ ' co iii 105— • — x - SS MOTTLED LIGHT GRAY AND BROWNISH-GRAY SANDY - SILTSTONE (WEATHERED) (VERY HARD, MOIST) -J _ 50-3" 0 - z 0 110— - -I' - 50-1"[] - BORING COMPLETED AT 111. 5 FEET ON 1/29/86 - OBSERVATION WELL INSTALLED TO 111. 5 FEET; _ DEPTH TO WATER MEASURED AT 10. 0 FEET - ON 1/29/86 115-- — Note: See Figure 2 for Explanation of Symbols --, L am. �I GeoEngineers LOG OF BORING 1111440 Incorporates! FIGURE 5 i I BORING NO. 2 I I — TEST DATA 6� T Cam = m a I o m c c >m o o Group DESCRIPTION _i i_ 20 0o coo co Symbol 0 SM MIXED BROWN AND BLACK SILTY FINE SAND WITH - A TRACE OF GRAVEL AND PARTINGS OF COAL I - FRAGMENTS (MEDIUM DENSE, MOIST) - I - 8 OL BLACK ORGANIC SILT WITH COAL FRAGMENTS I - (MEDIUM STIFF, MOIST) ,i - I 5— i — ML/ GRAY FINE SANDY SILT AND SILTY FINE SAND SM WITH OXIDIZED STAINS (SOFT OR LOOSE, WET) ! " 2 ■ - 10— I — _ 1 _ i SP- GRAY FINE SAND WITH SILT (VERY LOOSE, WET) i - SM - MD 22% 101 3 II 16— W - I - uJ 4 0 GRADES TO FINE SAND WITH A TRACE OF SILT I lL - - z 20_ 1 I - I _ a w o - - - ❑ I - . I N 25— 1 cc - SP- GRAY FINE SAND WITH SILT AND OCCASIONAL I - '� _ SM PARTINGS OF PEAT (LOOSE TO MEDIUM DENSE, ' z 10 • WET) ! - m I 30— I — 1 s - S , I _ MD 30% 92 10 U SM/ GRAY SILTY FINE SAND WITH LENSES OF BROWN i - PT PEAT (MEDIUM DENSE, WET) I - i 35— I — GRADES WITH A TRACE OF PEAT ,I - l - I • - I - MD,DS 25% 101 10 II♦ 40— �� _ / 'f Note: See Figure 2 for Explanation of Symbols • - I ��`1ll► LOG OF BORING `, GeoEngineers �� Incorporated FIGURE 6 I TEST DATA BORING NO. 2 m« (CONTINUED) I re -o c m c c Group DESCRIPTIONI F.- 2 rj oo coo co Symbol 40 i GW GRAY SANDY FINE TO COARSE GRAVEL WITH A I - - TRACE OF SILT (DENSE TO VERY DENSE, WET) I - _ i - 50-2" ■ - 45- 1 - 50-6" U - PT/ BROWN PEAT AND ORGANIC SILT WITH SAND 50— OL PARTINGS (SOFT TO MEDIUM STIFF, MOIST) I, -- 5 II I - SM GRAY SILTY FINE SAND WITH WOOD FRAGMENTS I ; 55—� AND A TRACE OF GRAVEL (MEDIUM DENSE, MOIST) _ H I- - ML BLUISH-GRAY CLAYEY SILT WITH A TRACE OF - ul MD 33% 90 '8 II FINE SAND AND WOOD FRAGMENTS (MEDIUM I U. - STIFF, WET) - 60- _ I- W C - - CO 5 • GRADES TO CLAYEY SILT WITH OCCASIONAL ''I - c - LENSES OF FINE SANDY SILT - N 65- _ ;n - w F - 1 - J _ Z 33 III I' - I - SP- GRAY FINE SAND WITH SILT (DENSE, MOIST TO WET) - 0 70--m S M I - 1 I - / I / I - SP GRAY FINE SAND WITH A TRACE OF SILT (VERY I - _ DENSE, WET) I ' MD,DS 21% 107 64 II - 75- I _ i - SM GRAY SILTY FINE SAND WITH A TRACE OF GRAVEL (MEDIUM DENSE TO DENSE, MOIST) 28 II' - I 80- / Note: See Figure 2 for Explanation of Symbols i 1 - ill' LOG OF BORING `��� GeoEngineers � Incorporated FIGURE 7 1 , TEST DATA BORING NO. 2 (CONTINUED) co m a� rC 3 C DESCRIPTION 11m oo �m °o Group 20 Do mc) m Symbol 80 ML/ GRAY FINE SANDY SILT AND SILTY FINE SAND - SM WITH A TRACE OF GRAVEL (VERY STIFF OR 22 VERY DENSE, MOIST) - 85— _ 40 0 SM LIGHT GRAY SILTY FINE SAND (VERY WEATHERED SANDSTONE) (DENSE, MOIST) 90— 5x 0 BLOW COUNT NOT REPRESENTATIVE OF SOIL - ENCOUNTERED - 95— I _ SS LIGHT GRAY SANDSTONE WITH LENSES OF SILTSTONE 50-1" 0 (VERY DENSE, MOIST) - W BORING COMPLETED AT 97. 5 FEET ON 1/31/86 W LL - Z100^ GROUND WATER ENCOUNTERED AT APPROXIMATELY — 7 FEET DURING DRILLING a. - W �o CO � I • N U7 - Q I- • Z W O S , M ^ Note: See Figure 2 for Explanation of Symbols �`��' LOG OF BORING GeoEnglneers `� Incorporated FIGURE 8 • • TEST DATA BORING NO. 3 c m a 0, a) c >m o c Group DESCRIPTION _Jco F_ V CG COU CO Symbol 0 _ PT BROWN SANDY PEAT WITH COAL FRAGMENTS (SOFT, WET) - 3 0 COAL BLACK COAL FRAGMENTS (LOOSE, WET) 5— OL GRAY ORGANIC SILT WITH WOOD FRAGMENTS AND LENSES OF SILTY FINE SAND (SOFT, WET) MD 52% 70 2 0 10— _ ML/ GRAY SILT WITH WOOD FRAGMENTS AND PT LAYERS OF DARK BROWN PEAT (SOFT, MOIST - TO WET) 3 • 0 - 15— — SP/ INTERBEDDED LENSES OF GRAY SILTY FINE SAND W - MD 32% 89 9 0 SM AND FINE SAND WITH A TRACE OF PEAT (LOOSE, - u. - WET) - z 20— — - 5M/ GRAY SILTY FINE SAND WITH A TRACE OF ORGANICi• _ ML MATTER AND GRAY FINE SANDY SILT (LOOSE, 0 - SOFT, WET)up - o MD,DS 30% 93 8 .o . • o 25— ct _ SP GRAY FINE SAND WITH A TRACE OF. SILT (VERY LOOSE TO LOOSE, WET) J 4 0 - 30— — 8 4 GRADES WITH LAYERS OF PEAT 35— - I _ MD 29% 94 15 0 GRAY FINE SANDY SILT AND SILTY FINE SAND SM WITH A TRACE OF WOOD FRAGMENTS (MEDIUM - STIFF, MEDIUM DENSE, WET) 40— _ Note: See Figure 2 for Explanation of Symbols GeoEn�gineers LOG OF BORING Incorporated FIGURE 9 1 BORING NO. 3 TEST DATA (CONTINUED) I a.„ GO--- I. c r m ca m o o m o o E Group DESCRIPTION 11- 20 co COO co Symbol 40 C GRAY SILTY CLAY AND CLAYEY SILT (STIFF, 'I - ML MOIST) 'I - I --- MD,DS 28% 97 15 01 45— 1 — _ SP GRAY FINE SAND WITH A TRACE OF SILT _ (DENSE, WET) - 34 0 1 - 1 50— 1 - 1 - • 21 0 1 - ASP- GRAY FINE SAND WITH SILT (DENSE TO VERY I - '55'-- SM DENSE, WET) I - - - 1 LLIW MD,DS 18% 112 52 0 IL - 1 _ 60— 1 a I W SM GRAY SILTY FINE SAND (MEDIUM DENSE TO DENSE) . I D WET) - 26 0 I - o N 65 1 — Z - 21 0 CONTAINS A TRACE OF GRAVEL 1 - _ I - , o 70— S _ / S K, 1 SM/ GRAY SILTY FINE SAND AND FINE SANDY SILT - MD,DS 14% 123 32 0 ML WITH A TRACE OF GRAVEL (DENSE, STIFF, WET). - I 75— 1 SS MOTTLED GRAY AND BROWN WEATHERED SANDY -- SILTSTONE (DENSE, MOIST) I - - 40 0I - _ I - 80— Note: See Figure 2 for Explanation of Symbols • 1 . ��(1�' LOG OF BORING 1 �A GeoEnglneers . 1, �� Incorporated 1 FIGURE 10 TEST DATA BORING NO. 3 (CONTINUED) co m to' m I « o m `o c0 .0 o o al Group DESCRIPTION oo mco w Symbol 80 1 - - 50-3" Q GRADES TO HARD UNWEATHERED SILTSTONE 50-2" p BORING COMPLETED AT 83.5 FEET ON 2/3/86 85— GROUND WATER ENCOUNTERED AT APPROXIMATELY 11 FEET DURING DRILLING 90_ I - I _ w w w z - x a • w o - N — 6 If, C i I- -J z CO , o � M - Note: See Figure 2 for Explanation of Symbols LOG OF BORING � GeoEnglneers ,wo Incorporated \/ FIGURE 11 FILE: R-016-86 REPORT OF SUPPLEMENTAL SOILS INVESTIGATION PROPOSED STORM DRAINAGE . — SOUTH OF PUGET POWER SWITCHING STATION • RENTON, WASHINGTON . FOR RENTON VILLAGE COMPANY • • • CD • • _ . . . . CITY OF l4:NTON FEB .2 0 ig86 . BUILDING/ZONING DPI, •• GeoEngineers , Inc. Consulting Geotechnical Engineers and Geologists ATTACHMENT #7 GeoEngineers, Inc. Consulting Geotechnical Engineers and Geologists May 19, 1982 Renton Village Company Evergreen Building Renton, Washington 98055 Attention: Mr. Everett Johnson Gentlemen: We are pleased to submit six copies of our Report of Supplemental Soils Investigation for the planned 60-inch storm drain to be constructed south of the Puget Sound Power & Light Company's switching station in Renton, Washington. The explorations accomplished for this investigation supplement the informa- tion developed in our initial soils investigation on this project, ehc. results of which are presented in our report to Puget Western, Inc. , dated March 26, 1982. The original concept for the drain included an open channel along the Talbot Road Extension side of the property. This section is now being planned as a culvert rather than an open channel. The scope of our services is described in our proposal letter of April 20, 1982. Authorization for our work was provided by S your acceptance of our pro- posal on April. 22, 1982. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you and are available to answer questions which may arise and to assist you in any further aspects, of the project, as appropriate. Yours very truly, • Ge eers, ip• J ck K. Tuttle ident WRC:JKT:wd File No. 344-02 P.O. Box 6325 • 2020- 124th Ave N.E. -Suite 201 • Bellevue, Washington 98007 • (206) 881-7900 • REPORT OF SUPPLEMENTAL SOILS INVESTIGATION PROPOSED STORM DRAINAGE k . • SOUTH OF PUGET POWER SWITCHING STATION RENTON, WASHINGTON INTRODUCTION The results of our supplemental soils investigation for the proposed storm drainage system are presented in this report. The planned drainage system is shown on the Site Plan, Plate 1, and will consist of 60- and 72-inch pipe. The 60-inch pipe will extend from the existing pipe arch which crosses Talbot Road t• South to a manhole at Station 7+55. At this point the drain will join with 42- and 12-inch pipes which cross Renton Village Road. The remainder of the new drain line will be 72 inches in diameter. It will tie into an existing drain- pipe near the southeast corner of the Malmo Nursery store. The invert of the 60-inch pipe will range from Elevation 20.11 to 21.14 feet (City of Renton datum). { • Filling to raise the existing site grade to cover the pipe will be necessary at the north end of the alignment. The invert elevation of the 72-inch pipe will range from 19 to 17 feet and is from 7 to 21 feet below the present ground sur face. Five access manholes will be spaced along the drainpipe alignment. Our report of March 26, 1982 discussed geotechnical considerations of the 72-inch drainpipe_portion of the project. The scope of this supplemental report 44 focuses on the 60-inch pipe portion and on the soil conditions near Manhole No. f.. . 1. Our proposal letter of April 20, 1982 outlined a series of Dutch cone pene- tration tests to explore subsurface conditions. However, site conditions were such that the Dutch cone equipment could not easily gain access, so we elected , to substitute borings with Standard Penetration Tests. SCOPE I - ` The purpose of this investigation is to explore the subsurface conditions along the 60-inch pipe alignment to develop additional information on the pres • ence of soft, compressible soils at or below the invert grade of the culvert. Additionally, we are to provide general comments on the suitability of condi- tions for either direct soil support, overexcavation and replacement of native ,', soils, or pile support. • GeoEngineers, Inc. Our conclusions and opinions are based solely on a review of the data obtained from these explorations plus information developed in our previous investigation. EXPLORATIONS Subsurface conditions were explored by drilling six borings along the alignment at the locations shown on Plate 1. The borings were drilled to depths! ranging between 19 and 29 feet. An engineering geologist from our staff estab- I lished the boring locations and examined and classified the soil samples obtained by the drilling subcontractor. The log of Boring P-1 at the west end of the drain line is shown on Plate 2. A generalized subsurface profile interpreted j from the driller's logs of Borings P-2 through P-6 is presented on Plate 3. The' stratigraphic information shown on the profile is based on interpolation of con ditions between the explorations and may vary significantly from actual conditions. The horizontal to vertical scale exaggeration on Plate 3 is 10 to 1 and was chosen to coincide with the drainpipe profile information provided us. Surveying for the boring locations was accomplished by taping from existing landmarks shown on the plan provided us. The elevations were determined from the topographical information on that plan. The locations and elevations of the borings should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method _ used. Disturbed samples of the subsurface soils were obtained from the borings at 5-foot intervals using a standard split-barrel sampler. The sampler was driven 18 inches into undisturbed soil with a weight of 140 g pounds falling a vertical distance of about 30 inches. The number of blows required to drive the sampler the final 12 inches give an indication of the relative density or consistency of the soils. The soil classification system used on the boring log (Plate 2) is described on Plate 4. SITE DESCRIPTION Vegetation along the 60-inch drainpipe portion of the alignment consists of tall bushes and grasses along the southern one-half. The northern one-half . is relatively clear of tall vegetation. Manhole No. 1 is located in an asphaltic concrete paved parking area. The ground surface along the alignment parallel to Talbot Road South i ranges from approximately 29 to 25 feet in elevation. The ground generally slopes downward from Station 8+00 to 7+70. - 2 - GeoEngineers,� Inc. An existing stream flows from north to south, crossing the storm drain at Station 7+70. This stream flows into an existing east-west drainage channel' . which enters the property from under Talbot Road South at the north end of the 1 proposed 60-inch pipe. Water flows from east to west parallel to the south side of the Puget Power switching station area. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Our explorations indicate variable soil conditions along the 60-inch drain' pipe alignment. The uppermost soil unit generally consists of manmade fill. i At our boring locations the fill consists of layers of clean sand, silty sand i and sandy silt placed in random fashion. The soil density or consistency ranges from very loose or soft to medium dense or stiff. The fill thickness at our 1 boring locations ranges from approximately 4 to 11 feet. Approximately 3 feet r of fill was encountered in our boring near the location of Manhole No. 1. A layer of soft, wet peat underlies the fill along the north-south portion; of the 60-inch drainpipe alignment. Within the depth of our explorations, the peat thickness ranged between 3 and 17 feet, the thicker and deeper portions occurring between Stations 9+00 and 11+00. Thin lenses of sand and seams of organic silt occur within the peat layer. ' I Medium dense sand and/or medium stiff silt underlie the peat at depths ranging between g g approximately 15 feet in the borings near the ends of the north- south portion of the alignment and at about 28 feet at Station 10+00. No peat was encountered in the boring near Manhole No. 1. A layer of medium stiff to stiff clayey to sandy silt about 7 feet thick underlies the fill at that location. Below this deposit, silty sand occurs to the depth p penetrated 'I by the boring (19 feet). Water was encountered in all of the borings. The elevation of the statical water level measured in the five borings on March 22, 1982 ranged between 25 ` • and 29 feet and is above the bottom of the proposed excavation. The inter- preted preted ground water level is shown on the subsurface profile. The log of Boring P-1 shows the water level near the location of Manhole No. 1 on May 1, L; 1982. Ground water levels should be expected p cted to fluctuate with seasonal change. L 1 � • I ` L - 3 - Ii GeoEngineers;Inc. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SUPPORT OF 60-INCH DRAINPIPE [. Our explorations along the 60-inch pipe alignment reveal varied conditions and significant depths of compressible soils at and below the planned invert level of the pipe. We recommend pile support of the pipe from the connection ' with the pipe arch crossing Talbot Road South to at least Manhole No. 4. Man- hole Nos. 4 and 5 should also be pile-supported. The pipe should be supported on bents located at the pipe joints. Two piles per bent should be adequate as loads will be fairly small. We recommend the use of timber piles although it must be recognized that somewhat overlength piles should be ordered because it will not be possible to predict accurately the required pile lengths due to variations in depth to supporting soils. We recommend that the piles be driven at least four (4) feet into the medium dense sands encountered in the lower portions of the borings, except in Boring No. P-4 ' Pile lengths should be estimated using the inferred soil profile shown on Plate 3 and then increased by 5 feet to allow for possible variations in the depth to the supporting layer. The manhole (No. 3) at Station 7+55 and the sections of pipe connecting this manhole to the one at approximately Station 8+40 (Manhole No. 4) can be soil-supported if the pipe joints can tolerate a small amount of differential - settlement. We recommend that Manhole No. 3 be supported on a layer of thor- oughly compacted crushed rock at least 18 inches thick. The section of pipe between Manhole Nos. 3 and 4 should be supported on a 12-inch thick bedding of clean coarse sand and gravel. Differential settlement between the pipe and pile-supported Manhole No. 4. should not exceed one-fourth to one-half inch for one length of pipe,providing that the natural soils beneath the bedding layer are not badly disturbed during excavation. SUPPORT OF MANHOLE NO. 1 The indicated bottom elevation for Manhole No. 1 should result in support ' of the structure on the medium dense sands which underlie the silt deposit. The manhole can be supported directly on this material if the bearing area is kept in an essentially undisturbed state. Dewatering in advance of excavation to the base level for the manhole will be an important element of successful installation. It may be desirable to overexcavate and place a layer of - 4 - II • thoroughly compacted crushed rock to protect the bearing surface. This layer should be at least 12 inches thick. •I r DEWATERING Careful attention to dewatering in advance of trench excavation to invert grade will be an important part of this project, particularly where the pipe and manhole structures will be soil-supported. We suggest that at .least six observation wells be installed along the alignment to monitor the effectiveness of the dewatering system chosen by the contractor. These wells should extend approximately five feet below the pipe invert elevation. EXCAVATIONS Excavations along the pipeline alignment were discussed in our report of March 26, 1982. If dewatering is accomplished as intended, we estimate that trench slopes may stand as steep as from 1:1'to 11:1 (horizontal to vertical) where cohesive silty or clayey soils are encountered and 11:1 (horizontal to j.. vertical) in ,cleaner sands. Trench slopes may have to be flattened if seepage : I , which cannot be controlled by the dewatering system should occur. It may be preferable to excavate a partially sloped cut and use a trench box for the lower j few feet of the excavation. It -should be the contractor's responsibility to provide adequate and safe shoring throughout the construction activities. r BACKFILL We understand that the intended future use of the area over the pipeline will be for parking. It is our opinion that backfill over the pile-supported section of the pipe can consist of excavated material, excluding peaty soils, for that portion of trench which is more than two feet below the desired sub- 1 L. grade level. The upper two feet of soil should be basically granular and should be compacted well enough to provide a stable subgrade for the planned parking. , t,: This procedure also applies to the alignment which parallels Renton Village Road. If excavated soils are too wet so that they cannot be compacted to form stable subgrade, it may be necessary to import a more suitable granular fill material: CONSTRUCTION MONITORING We are available to provide assistance in monitoringthe earthwork ortions p , of the construction. This includes review of the dewatering system installa- tion and operation, pile installation and excavation and backfill activities. ,• - 5 - GeoEngineers, Inc. tJ • • USE OF THIS REPORT AND WARRANTY We have prepared this report for Renton Village Company and their engineers i for use in design of this project. The data and report should be provided to prospective contractors for their bidding or estimating purposes, but our re- port, conclusions and interpretations should, not be construed as a warranty of ! the subsurface conditions. If there are changes in the grades, location, configuration or type of construction, the conclusions and recommendations presented may not be appli- cable. If design changes are made, we request that we be given the opportunity; to review our conclusions and recommendations and to provide a written modifica- tion and verification. When the design has been finalized, we recommend that the final design and specifications be reviewed by our firm to see that our recom- mendations have been properly interpreted and implemented. The scope of our work does not include services related to construction safety precautions and our recommendations are not intended to direct the con- ' tractor's methods, techniques, sequences or procedures, except as specifically described in our report for consideration in design. There are probable variations in subsurface conditions between the explora- tions. A contingency-for unanticipated conditions should be included in the budget and schedule. Sufficient monitoring, testing and consultation by our firm should be provided during construction to confirm that the conditions en- countered are consistent with those indicated by the explorations, to provide recommendations for design changes should the conditions revealed during the work differ from those anticipated, and to evaluate whether or not earthwork and foundation installation activities comply with contract plans and specificaL tions. Within the limitations of scope, schedule and budget for our work, we warrant that our work has been done in accordance with generally accepted practices followed in this area at the time the report was prepared. No other warranty, express or implied, is made. 1 V [j GeoEngineers, Inc. ; If there are any questions concerning this report or if we can provide additional services, please call. Respectfully submitted, GeoEngineers, Inc. Ir G of WAS;ZiN' e �'�y'�'� )• e Will :m R. Clevenger Proj,ct Geologi A //,P R F,o )5ki OFF FGISTE ���+tf ss„NM.Edit Ja . Tutt e P •- -ident WRC:JKT:wd • L'..i Attachments - • • i - • L.� . L.i • .• L f ' _ 7 - GeoEngineers, Inc. L_.. . , .. . • . . . . . . , . "' •..,. . •. .. • • • - . . . PLATE 1 • * ' • . .-- , . . ... .. . . ( j 1 • . .i . . • .. . .,,. . , . . • •- . . . . . . . . . ' * . . • .•• . . . . _ , . . , . t-•:. , -. • ' / . * - • • . I.: -. ' * ..r., • . . . . . ' * . . •. .. ,. , • . ',i ..i . . , . . • rc • . . . . MH-5 0 P-• • , . . . • - . • . . . - . - ' . • . , . . - x.' . . • [1 . - .;- •-: ; ' - -.- . . . - . . . . . , PUGET POWER • 41 • • • SWITCHING. STATION_ _ _ _ , _ ____ • . _... .._,.. __ ___ . . .__,, _ . . .../._-..A-__ ' . • , , • . ( • , 1 •• . . x. , x x , _ x • _ _. „ . , . [TIL . _ .. . . . . :. • , , , .._ic- ...._ _____ 25 ______<. _._....,_____. .._._..___ , . . . ..,. < • . . ...._ . ,- • . . ,... _ . .-. . . • „ . - - . , . 4›. __--- ' ... . i , • , , . 0 . . -,. - • ,_ - . , • - • i ' . •'1 - ''I • * . 0• • . . . . , . i it, - .. - ..•-•'-'---- *.--------- --------.----.----- 25 . . _ .. . AI" m % • ,. ,...• -... . •. - (------ • - . . . •. , -0. P-5 - . . . , , . . . , - ' . . . •- , .. -PAY' N-SAVE . - ' • • • "-- • - . • . , . . . . ., . . ... . . . . . - . Li ..-- ..-. • - -. . •- . . . . . • . • . . . . . , - • - • . . . .. • ,. • A i.Q - - -- - • .. . .. - • • .... . , . . , . .. ... . . . . • . • • . . . . . . . , . • - - • , • .. .. . . . : :,-.-•:- , .• . . . . . . . ._ . [I. (Ni_:,• ., , . . -. . • - . . . - . • - -‘.... . • • -,. • _ : • . - •. • . .- ... •• 0 • • ' .• ..... •- • . . .. . • • . . .. . . . • _ . _ . .. ..• • _ . • • • • . - • • •. . •< . . . N.- ., : .. .. \.- ••• . . . . . . . _ . .... .,„. . . . . , • • - . - • .. , . . . • . • • „ . • . . . . . • - - • • ' - • : '\' • \ ,... . . -. • . . • • • • i-- . .•. . : •I in . . . ..• . . •• • . _ _ . . . . . • . .. ., . . .. .L._: - . -- • • . . .-. , • . .. • . •. •- - .. EXISTING 2 . • . • . . • \ . ..• ., \CONCRETE PIPE LA \ .... . . ,....:„. . a. • c,• . .1 . + . . • - :-, - ...__,_ . • • - ) . . : . . -:. - -: -..•--• . , • . , .. , . 0 • • • - , .. „: , - P-4 - '1 --1 • . - - • ' .-.;., ., k. : ' ' •', .. • . Y ... . _..., .. ., ' - - -.' .... . . , •- '.'-:'' . • . ' •: ... ,. ... -..., • ' ' • " - • . . ., ' I • i - - - \ , ,,... 2, . ,., ,,, , .. . ED'.•.--. , : . .. ,"---. . : -• • -. ... _ , . . .. . . . ... .. -.•.--..;„. ,. , . ., . • . , _ .-- .,....., . ..-.. .-.=. ' , - . '"-- ' ----'•- ---.-'•-'1----,•• ••'•-•.i-.- ' ' - 60". STORM'-'1:::-.. .,,. -•' -• .. ...-- - - D RA IN .. , . .. , ... . ,.. „ . . • ... . . ....• -.. .. .__ ''' ---z' 0 PS PL ''.- I=• ' --..--:•• . . . , _,, - .. --....-. • - - VAULT . . ....., ,... ..,.... „ „ . „_. . . . -Fr'?-f,:::.....5.•-• -,. ....,-,....,-,:,-.: -••• , . - H..... '. --:-;. - ,- . . A.:.......i.:;:-,-.:-.:::::-.:..,,,,...-_:e:-L'. :-. - ,,,,- -,---,,,,- - .--,---.% .:' -.- -', - - -, -:' --:-,:,-. .----- „---",,, :.„....,,,,.....:.,.:.,,,,,,..,,,,.,,,,-, :-.7...,.-...--,,,,....--,..,..„,,,: /-,. --. -..., . :,. •.:-. . ,;::,--;;.... -.. .;•-z.--„„:-........,- ..;',,,,.:' ,':.,1.'.1„.;,...:,-.: ,'::s;.%:. . 1 . ..--:,,,D,.--..., '. --„,„;,..----, • • ......... b'-''..,-'-''''Ll'-:.i.-.,t•'-',.,'-'',..'". '' : ::'1-:,',':-•' .-. ' , —• / --',..........-:,--.---:-'2;: -. PROPOSED •72 tt '''''.2.:-..:::-. ••-- •"•:- •.• '-:- ;•---- /---."----: .2,-", ...3,_:;-,...,-:;:'. .--•."-..-.•...,..:_.',-„,-,-....__-,J..•--.:,---.%,•!_-„,..;.'1.,::'•__,•;,3.•-,,',._z.,,-,,,...":„.,,,-.:,,-.._',..:-1,•=:.....__,.;,..,..-...,•..,-...„..: . ,i.:,.."-',: • .• '.'.:.=.'-.1"' - ' .U-7.--:-;:`,..-•,!....."..'':"'- -•:;':•;2:7'1-.4•";:•.':1:;7'•%'-:":13;',7...•'•••11-•••.'::.z.".•;]• ..••-:::•••••• • • 4* ,. . ..., -.F.',.-.''..•'-.,•••2,-;':' :': .'-`..`'' * 0,.....''.:.::-*-',.*:'.:' . •••-.' . •STORM DRAIN/---;', .''-•'-.••-•--......;-j'''..'.'•.-..-• /'-'.-.;f.: ...-r -...:'.-'''':-.-":-..-„:-:'2'..-- ''-f--.'''';':'.?:'-'•..'t-,‘;'2'.'.'•:s•-.'....:';:---'..'••7'.7:4;:--";74r:"-•,....',",...-'-"-7.'-.. -1-`,.';';';',":;'-.'-',.:'•.:::::':i ' •-• :•K:, •"":1:- ‘'N ''''L.)•-*'.::'--.• -.- ,.•'.,' • •• *. •••.•-•_;;T"•:-: ' ';.•-• --.:'.1.'-',•.•,;•••',;.--•;- . ....,. ., . -. *. •.:*'-'-'," :,•-•• • .,)•• . :-.,- , •.-:'-' °. .. .!•,.-.1„,,,,,...„::,,,;,,-.;;;,-: ..--,.--,F•_.•••• ‘ . , , .-,..,...-;,.:,,,-,..,,,•, ,: ,L,. ,.„..•,,, • - _. ,,,: ....... -r...,,,,‘,-,..- •.••_,..i.:N."-:-..;- :- • (:,,,,,:.• _ .,..,•-.-.,-!..--•,-,....... .:Sr..,=;',•,' '-''..,,..-•-:..:.,;'.•-•‘---•:::„.:;-':,- -'-''',.f-:-'...•'',,•:',.,'-'•:,'ff.:---: : - -:•.,.-. -.,.: .- .',='-. -.• ...-.,-\-... '-,:-.•.:'-.,`.- - - . • '-z'';::':2-'_''•'.-. .'•:,-"!:.•:,,,,.:'-:,:-:'-•.f•,:".-•," '.-' • •It::::.,':- , ''- - . -- 1:-.1,-:,-. ,- .-•',-!:117:;f:,`-_ :',Vi.: !•7--•,:.1 -_-..'•-l' T.:-.;-,-_1.-;.:-.'•;:; : ..2.-,', ,-,.', .,:— .".- .,-'5'• :',':::-2.:._;:....• '..-‘. •:: :'-C7.7. :-,-...: -',:j..';'-'.:-.. '.:•-.;•:::•-,11.-,:.j..';',-C.4..''.:k.-'''.:.-;.,-;:',:1:,--i'i;.--,:•!?...:-. :::.:'.314-1. ,'-/-''-':'::••:; :-.A-;':':--.V._'•:"-•:::: 2..•''.---.;'''.: ."-:';''''-•:;-'''-',-'.1:.;,:.:,. --.2 ':-.=-,''''.''`'':.:-'_'-'...-.. :-.3i.'sa ...-:-::'-'g',..'?'--•;';':-.T•A*1;-:' :::: :::".',?'''''i^ .:-...„,..,,, —_... .•:-,i1‘,,,..,,-,-.-15, 1. f:r.:1;2:,.-2,'- ',,,Yz:7r,:':-::-,•-'4:',.;_.':*;:‘:::: :,$-.-2:.,:. 'z':-.::•'-.::,,,::,.. ...„,:,-i.,...-:,_ . .-•::,,:::•,•-..:: :L.,,"...:, ..-..4 '----'••)'-',•„:";-*•,:i;=,1t:'•' -`;;::.-,'7.••1"-',-;*-••••-1,f,-.-1---,j.••; ,•:'4':•;;;_;,..':,-.-:,,.--..:,?-,-.,"•':-'',tr....--.,.:4•.:1;:7Z., •'•21,7'.,.'..--••..', „.•T.'•-.2....-.•...•'..•-i•-•.-----c•,,; ;-•,..-.-,..-- ' '...,'-','-•,,••-•,..::•:',,C-,,,.•- '-„s*"•---........._;•,,,.......„..'::':-.'-.:--;....-:••(`':'...: .:,--- ''.•:ii,‘•--J*%-;- ' ' '.- 1, 1::-..,.;.. . :4), :-...•- - :.-']-'....--...••..',-..• _:..-•-•-•••—•,,, - • 0 - •Ir.r.-.. . . , 03 -•,'-'?-: _ .,.,. 7,1''''',..s,',;*•7-.. .-:.',‘,,,7:---;;;•, -.=1:.-- ,-;:..'',-,---','.•-•:".-- EWE SI-3-3 ' < ._.. -. ,-. .-... , . . • : .. ,'• . ,, . . 0 - PS PL ..- . - .. . .,Ii \'':' p.L.2141111‘j.' • ." ,-,,,..-.;;.: .1:- ' . - .. .. - ... 1.-- ...,. ..,. ., .„ ,. . . P-1 - - - •. . . PS PL ,. • . ... . . ___- .. . . . . . . .,. ....: .. . Dycutz.1-,' - •• " •:—.' ' ' -., - • • • ' .. . .. .. . ... -.--„7:'..:/!-.--1,, --,---.::::,:,-. . --,."--.',":-: . -. .:',--.-4-.5,,::..' _. ' - .----' -.. .- - '---7"-- - ."-' — •• ,-'- - . • ',' -., -,_-- ----_,) ':.. - .: -.. .-- --.-- i ---,' •:..- .• .-- -- - -- - - . . 7--,c , -- .. . ,: ;.•'- --•_-:-''.•'-;--,:..-:-..=": --.--..... _ . . ,.. . . .... . ,. . • ._. _._ ...... , .. .. ._ . . .... . . . . .. 8+00 ,- - • • - . . .. , .. 5+00 6+00. 747.1.60 - . . - - - '•• — - - - ' 0+00. ••• - . -'' ••• 1+00 ( • '2-100•'' -- -' :-. ' " - ••- 1.:3+00- . ' - -- /++.00 . _.. — . . . . . , • . . . . • . • . . ... .... • • , •ft, SOUTH.,gENTON VILLAGE PLACE . . ... - „. - - . . -. ...-• • . . • • • ....- - • . - ... . . . , . . - • • -. . -... ..,. ... . .. - `'-• - ' . .,, •, ..„ .. . . ., . . . .. . - . . , -------- • . --...• --......,-,,,-. • - '- .,..- .' -..77.\,-.-7.-:-. • .,-.., -..„-.-; .-, • !,:".•••.3,-,-,:,,,..,..,--.-..,_...,.., -, ,i,:0„,/,,z-.,j.:•••-,,.,.....•-....-,.„..... .. -.. ....... .'....•.•-•..„:,7',:,,7,,?,..;!,i......-s_..7.-,..--.,,:.;::7'.:,,,i.',. ;,:-......_:,,,t.:..,,,,,......;.:.,,....,...z, .•:„.,,,,•.,-..: i, .., - --- J -. - . . ... - 30:--•.*:••:.:,t,-1.7•-:;?;,:•• ,„' ;';'..-* ;‘''',• -•-.'''''..•-*'.;--'...",:•,- \'•:-.-: . - ---. •:--. .`.•••'!--.. . EXPLANATIoN:':.:,,, " - - -" - „. , . ,., .. . ... . •. • --; --''.. 1.± .. -. '• ,':..- '-'7--:- - .:.,-;;' • - .. .• . ' : ..: ..':.- ''' ::-,:-..-,..:-:, ,1';'::::',:,;,:;:--,.,::•.---:1,;4..,. -,•:':_ ',.‘?,•:;.'.'-':'-'1:":,,, :'-.....,..,:!.::--::::'. , . - -.; :-''..;'. ...- -'• T-,.,-,•::-. ..'. -,-,. , '':F.--::::- • : -.1:ii 6.0' .'':‘.: .: - ::-'-. a -. . ' HF"'', 60 ''''.','.: -- •-•-,:-.-'• . - ::::"----- --.--?',. <- DIRECTION OF STREAM- FLOW , . ..,., . , . ,.,. . ... ., ,,. . .‘,....- — --- .., -11, ' ' ....„.,...,- ,::,-,-,-..„-,,,,..;;',...._-.,-.-.... -. -:.•:,':::-..----„, ..:'..i.,.. . - ' '- .--' ' ' ' - :' - - ''-- ..i---:-I'. -----".:'-.."'" '''''---=-''"...--`'=''''L-'-i--;"'.-'''-' ',-- '':-."'':,-- • ' - ' - '" - : '-.." • , ''''.': - • •• SCALE IN. FEET,-.1..-.1-'..7-4:-`;;;,..-',,'-.,-,..:-..-_ "--,-;' ... . . . ' - •REFERENCE : ... . -...--- . . r -':.;-2:-.•,-.' - .., DRAWING ENTITLED "EAST BASIN INTERCEPTOR • . ' A '. .- • : .-',-,-..;,•:4-,.,- • • -i-,--....-• STORM DRAIN-, RENTON, WASH INGTON",• ..., ., ,,,. ;:•,.....,•• . .„ , .. ,, . .. . . , ,..., _ ,., .., ....,.- '• - -.- •BY JONES . ASSOCIATES', INC. - .',....,-- .. . . • • • DATED MARCH 5, 1982 & REVISED MAY 13, 1982 ., - Gec•Engineers Inc. . i - • - SITE PLAN _ . . ..., . 1 •• . ....—..— - .- . 1 • . - • . if , - . . • . • •• . - . • a = •-::::1 , Y , w ' - 4, ,' x GROUND WATER ' EVEL "� 25 I .`. �^ LOOSE TO MEDIUM — ` • 25 ' - �fil DENSE :SILTY SAND LOOSE LOOSE SILTY SAND AND �� I. SOFT SANDY SILT 'SAND - i,:. SOFT . LL 72 0 \ FI _. PIPE PEAT \ a PIPE !r �' SAND _ Yy: - 0 _T OF — S - r2 FT � "S . I i I— S �, •S I • i. S IL T Y 0 S N D E - - 00 - L PEAT " r. : AND• :::::S OFT EA r. �r. ...... LOOSE _ SE .. L 15' _ - . - SAND w . . w a r tL = SOFTPEAT °� ao .PEA T,:. . z, LOOSE_ SI T Y C— L AND" _ j, MED.IUM DENSE _ -.] SAND OOSE., s. LT ; 571 @ �' li wR P F.1,E:iiiON _ 5" - SIL `( '-MEDFIi1N; DENSE SAND ! : i . ,„ LoosE ANo _ � VE8 ? 01986. . - • 4 0 SOFT TO' P1EDIUM STIFF SANDY I . _ ,_ -,...B0U.11.,017/ZONING DEPT, -.,.. i AND CLAYEY SILT JNOTES: 1) THE SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS" SHOWN PRE BASED - ON INTERPOLAT I ON 'BETWEEN. THE EXPLORATIONS. VARIATIONS FROM ' I • I THE DEPICTED SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS ] _ _ 8+00 � �9100 10-+00 11+00 NAY BE EXPECTED. . • 2) VERTKCAL SCALE' I:S EXAGGERATED TEN • NATIONS IN .FEET TIMES THE HORIZONTAL SCALE . ] .. , , i = 5'Yi 3) LOCATION OF EXPLORATIONS IS SHOWN 17 ' ON PLATE 1 . t n„g IONSUNKNOWN JI /" 4) ;-�NhiOLE BASF ELE�!�TI ...,� 1 PIPELINE ALIGNMENT PROFILE j _ GPI®EE1�tneers I1`�c0 OFf EET 10 TO 15 FEET WEST OF EXPLORATIONS.. j, (-I ' PLATE 2 • BORING NO. P-1 ELEVATION : 26 FEET *GRAPHIC 0 *TEST DATA LOG DESCRIPTION ASPHALTIC CONCRETE 1� GM BROWN SILTY SANDY GRAVEL (MEDIUM DENSE, MOIST)(FILL) 5- ML BROWN AND GRAY MOTTLED CLAYEY TO SANDY SILT (MEDIUM STIFF TO STIFF, MOIST) 12 a 0 `F la+ 1 Q� I Z N SM BROWN SLIGHTLY SILTY FINE TO MEDIUM SAND � . 3: (MEDIUM .DENSE, MOIST) o w A 15- 1: 20.E r BORING COMPLETED AT 19 FEET ON 5-1-82 r Y - ''' WATER LEVEL AT 9 FEET (ELEVATION 17) DURING DRILLING CITY OF REI aO M Of /1.1 FEB 2 01986 • BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. *SEE KEY FOR EXPLANATION OF SYMBOLS GeoEngineers Inc. LOG OF EXPLORATION - DEPTH PLATE 4 N BORING LOG AND SAMPLE DATA KEY DRIVEN SAMPLES BLOWS REQUIRED TO DRIVE SAMPLER ONE FOOT OR INDICATED j ! MOISTURE /PENETRATION USING 140 POUND HA}t9ER FALLING 30 INCHES CONTENT "P" INDICATES SAMPLER PUSHED WITH WEIGHT OF HA*4MF.R - 11.2""/."�111 28 • DRY DENSITYINDICATES LOCATION OF UNDISTURBED SAMPLE IN PCF ® INDICATES LOCATION OF DISTURBED SAMPLE INDICATES LOCATION OF SAMPLING GRAPHIC LOG ATTEMPT WITH NO RECOVERY LETTER SYMBOL • SM SOIL TYPE OTHER TYPES OF SAMPLES DISTINCT CONTACT INDICATES LOCATION OF THIN WALL, BETWEEN SOIL STRATA PITCHER, OR OTHER TYPES OF SAMPLES (SEE TEXT) / GRADUAL CHANGE BETWEEN SOIL STRATA BOTTOM OF BORING 1.' UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM I MAJOR DIVISIONS LETTER DESCRIPTIONS •. SYMBOL GRAVEL CLEAN GRAVELS GW afLL-GRADED GRAVELS. auWL-SAND ' •COARSE AND NIXT111Es. LITRE OR NO FINES GRAVELLY ILITTLE OR PO FI►ES) rl GRAINED SOILS GP jv-G:IDE s.Y LS.LE o rpcs SOILS ,ow ,sox GRAVELS CF COARSE FRAC- WITH FINES GM SILTY GRAVELS. GRAVEL-SAND-SILT TION RFTAIrf Di IC.4 SIEVE (APPRECIABLE APOIYT CLAYEY GRAVELS. GRAVEL-SAN:• -SILT or FINES) GC MIXTURES SAND CLEAN SANDS SW YELL GRADED SANDS. GRAVELLY SAS. AND LITTLE OR W FINES - T)wN sox SANDY SOILS (LITTLE OR IC FRCS) OGRE SP POORLY-CAVED SANDS. GRAVELLY SACS. ff)MTERIAL IS LITTLE ff W FINES WWI TWW!O. TWA 30% 200 SIEVE SIZE tF tcaARSE - SANDS SM s 'rim pg � WITH FINESSILTY suns, SAND-SILT MIXTURES v.4 SIEVE 'APPRECIABLE AMOUNT ff FPCS) SC CLAYEY SAWS. SNC-C,AY MIXR/ffs INORGANIC SILTS. AND VERY FINE SANDS. ROCK FINE SILTS ML SANDS OR CCLUAYYEY SILTS WIn'H sitar. GRAINED AND LIQUID LIMIT PLASTICITY SOILS LESS CLAYS THAN 50 INEMANtc curs OF LOM TD)EDILP • CL PLASTICITY. GRAVELLY CLAYS. SANDY CLAYS. SILTY CLAYS. LEAK CLAYS OL ORGANIC SILTS AM ORGANIC SILTY • CLAYS OF LOr PLASTICITY SILTS MH INORGANIC M,CE OISFlit SAS. ND OR SILTY SO SOILS POW THAN LIQUID LIMIT ' OF MATERIAL IS ,y4VALLER mi W. AND G;{���,��ATER_ CH PORG,NIC CLAYS OF NIGH PLASTICITY !00 SIEVE SIZE �I ITf"IA �B �dIT1T . CLAYS 1 4 (.1 I, IT @9. ., FAT cuts• is cu CF MEDIUM TD NIGH PP 111H PLASTICITY. ORGANIC SILTS HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILSE IQ `2' 6 1986 OPT PEAT. . sump sons WITS NICK! ORGANIC coNTEr.YTs BUILDING/70N NG roPT 0101L S I(LS IC!ATE eoRnERLTiE SOIL CLASSIFICATIM. GeoEngineers Inc. UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM AND KEY TO SAMPLE DATA - - • FILE: R-016-86 • REPORT OF SUPPLEMENTAL GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES STORM DRAIN AT PUGET POWER SUBSTATION TALBOT ROAD AND RENTON VILLAGE PLACE RENTON, WASHINGTON 1 1 I C3 1 _ NtLi.J'e! LU FEB 2O19 6 BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. GeoEngineers, ATTA(HMFNT #R GeoEngineers, Inc. Consulting Geotechnical Engineers and Geologists July 16, 1982 I- Renton Village Company • 830 Logan Building - Seattle, Washington 98101 Attention: Mr. James E. Warjone Gentlemen: We are pleased to submit six copies of our "Report of Supplemental Geotechnical Engineering Services" for a portion of the proposed storm drain alignment which will be constructed on the Puget Power switching station site in Renton, Washington. Our current services supplement information presented in our previous reports for the project dated March 26 and May 19 , 1982. The supplemental services have r included additional subsurface explorations, consideration of a possible surcharging program to preinduce settlement along the storm drain alignment, and finalizing pile j-, design criteria for storm drain support. i The scope of our current services is described in our Confirming Agreement dated July 9, 1982. Our work was authorized by your "Confirming Agreement Supplement Geotechnical Engineering Services Storm Drain- of Puget Power Station, Talbot and Renton Village Place, Renton, Washington, File No. 344-03" dated July 15, 1982. Preliminary results of the study have been discussed with you and other members of the design team as our findings were developed. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you on this project. If you -) have any questions concerning the contents of this report or if we can be of further service, please call. Your very truly, G- .`- •gineers, J K. Tuttle resident JBT:JKT:wd cc: Renton Village Co. Li Attn: Mr. Everett Johnson Northwest Engineering Company KPFF Attn: Mr. Lawrence M. Grimm Attn: Mr. Joe Hofbeck File No. 344-03 P.O. Box 6325 • 2020 - 124th Ave N.E. -Suite 201 • Bellevue, Washington 98007 • (206) 881-7900 REPORT OF SUPPLEMENTAL GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES STORM DRAIN AT PUGET POWER SUBSTATION • TALBOT ROAD AND RENTON VILLAGE PLACE RENTON, WASHINGTON • INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of our supplemental pp geotechnical engineering services for a portion of the proposed storm drain alignment which will be constructed on the Puget Power switching station site in Renton, Washington. A description of the storm drain is presented in our previous reports for the project dated March 26 and May 19, 1982. Our supplemental services focus on the portion of the storm drain between the culvert which crosses Talbot Road and approximately Station 7+00 (Plate 1). The E:! purposes of our current work are to perform additional subsurface explorations, P , _ consider a possible surcharging program to preinduce settlement along the storm drain alignment, and finalize pile design criteria for storm drain support. EXPLORATIONS r- I - Six additional-borings (Borings 6 through 11) were drilled to depths ranging from 24 to 6654 feet at the approximate locations shown on Plate 1 to develop information on the full soil profile down to the bedrock.surface. All borings, with the exception of Li Borings 7 and 10, extended to bedrock. Boring 7 did not extend to bedrock because of a misunderstanding with respect to your desires to define bedrock along the full length I. of this portion of the storm drain. Boring 10 was not extended to bedrock because of the existence of adequate data from a nearby boring drilled for a previous investigation. The borings were advanced using a truck-mounted, continuous-flight, hollow- stem auger, Mobile B-61 drill rig. All borings were performed under the full-time ' monitoring of a member of our staff who recorded the progress of drilling, obtained representative samples of the soils encountered, observed ground water levels, and maintained a detailed log of each exploration. Soils were classified in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System described on Plate 3. The logs of the borings are presented on Plates 4 through 14. The boring logs are based on our interpretation of the field and laboratory data and indicate the various types of soils encountered. u They also indicate the depths at which the soils or their characteristics changed, although the change may actually be gradual. If the change occurred between samples, it was interpreted. Li GeoEnglneers, Inc. r One-dimensional consolidation tests were performed on two representative samples to measure the dimensional and time-rate compressibility characteristics of the more compressible soils. The results of the consolidation tests are presented on Plate 15. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS A subsurface profile showing the variation in soil conditions along the alignment from Station 7+00 to the Talbot Road culvert is presented on Plate 2. As shown on this profile, the subsurface conditions encountered in the current borings are similar to those encountered in the previous borings. The greatest thickness of compressible soils is indicated to exist between approximately Stations 7+50 and 11+00. The reader should refer to our earlier reports for a general description of subsurface conditions along the storm drain alignment. The results of the borings indicate that the sandstone bedrock surface slopes downward to the north. The bedrock surface was encountered at a depth of 41 feet in f Boring B-6 located at approximately Station 7+60, while the bedrock surface was encountered at a depth of about 64 feet in Boring 11 located near the northern end of the storm drain project. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS GENERAL The portion of the storm drain alignment between T-albot Road and approxi- ' mately Station 7+00 is underlain by significant thicknesses of compressible soils. Two possible means for support of this portion of the storm drain have been considered: soil support with an appropriate surcharging program to preinduce settlements or pile support. Geotechnical design criteria have been developed for bot h th means of support. The advantages and disadvantages of these options have been discussed at several meetings with members of the design team, as well as representatives of Renton Village Company. We understand that the pile support scheme has been selected. Use of pile foundations has the following major advantages. 1.. The drain pipe can be installed without delay for surcharging (estimated three to six months), thus preventing full construction to proceed as soon as permits are received and a contract is let. r2. Slightly steeper trench slopes can be used for pipe installation since minor , sloughing can be tolerated. 3. Careful preparation of soil bearing surfaces for pipe and structure support will not be necessary. • - 2 - GeoEngineers, Inc. ;i 3 4. The need for controlled bedding and backfill requirements will be reduced. 5. Although trench dewatering to the extent necessary to work in the dry will be needed, limited seepage or quick conditions in the bottom of the trench can be tolerated. r 6. Postconstruction settlements of the storm drain line will be minimized. i , 7. Constraints on future development of the property relating to the presence of the storm drain will be minimized. The following section of this report presents geotechnical criteria for pile design. PILE DESIGN r We have analyzed pile design criteria for both timber friction piles supported in the alluvial soils which overlie the bedrock and higher capacity end-bearing pipe piles r which would be driven into the sandstone bedrock. The relative costs of these two i- ' types of piles have been evaluated by KPFF, Consulting Engineers. We understand that the results of this evaluation indicate that timber friction piles will be more 1_H economical than end-bearing pipe piles. Therefore, the remainder of this report deals exclusively with timber friction piles. We recommend that the pipe be supported on pile bents located at the pipe joints. Manholes and other vaults located along this portion of the alignment should r also be supported on piles to reduce the potential for differential settlement. ' Construction might be expedited if the piles are driven from the surface using a follower rather than driving the piles after the trench has been excavated. We understand that the timber piles will be designed for g an axial capacity of 25 tons each. Pile cutoff will be at about Elevation 18. We recommend that timber piles [J penetrate to the tip elevations presented in Table 1 or to practical refusal, whichever occurs first, to achieve an axial capacity of 25 tons per pile. Table 1 - Timber Pile Design Estimated Pile Tip Elevation Estimated Pile �; Project Station For 25-Ton Capacity (Feet) Downdrag Force (Tons) 11 6+75 -2 7 7+50 -10 7 Li 8+00 -10 3 8+50 -12 3 9+00 -14 3 ri 9+50 -17 3 Li 10+00 -18 3 11+00 -19 11+50 -20 7 Lij 12+00 -20 7 7 12+50 -20 7 • _J - 3 - GeoEngineers, Inc. Ee~j The pile tip elevations presented in Table 1 have been computed based on the strength of the supporting soils using a factor of safety of 2.5. It is expected that two-pile bents E�:t will be used for most of the alignment. If surface conditions (such as overhead power lines) require a greater bent spacing, the piles should be spaced at least three diameters on center. If this is done, no reduction for group efficiency will be necessary. We recommend that piles be ordered somewhat overlength to account for variations in the i depth to supporting soils. Piles driven from Station 6+75 to about 8+00 are expected to encounter bedrock. We estimate that the settlement of timber piles installed as recommended above will be on the order of one-half inch or less. Most of this settlement will tend to occur during construction as loads are applied. Postconstruction differential settlements ri should be minor. Plans are to fill the property in the future to about Elevation 32 feet. The r placement of this fill will cause pile downdrag forces as the soil settles relative to the J pile. Estimated downdrag forces for timber piles are presented in Table 1. These downdrag forces should be deducted from the allowable pile capacity of 25 tons to determine the net working capacity of the piles. Pile design should also consider the weight of the soil overlying the pipe. Future placement of fill will also result in significant differential settlements between the ground surface over the pile-supported pipe and adjacent planting or parking areas. We estimate that these differential settlements could be on the order of 12 to 18 inches, depending on the thickness of the fill and the filling sequence. The effects of these differential settlements can be mitigated by performing rough grading a year or so in advance of final yard grading so that compensating fill can be placed. As an alternate, a preloading program could be considered if it is desired to reduce the waiting period needed for settlement under the fill. We recommend that the timber piles be driven to the penetrations indicated in Table 1 or to refusal, whichever occurs first, using a pile-driving hammer having a minimum rate of energy of 13,000 foot-pounds per blow. Refusal criteria for pile Li Li driving will be dependent on the specific characteristics of the hammer used. When the hammer has been selected, we can establish appropriate refusal criteria. EXCAVATION Excavation of the storm drain trench should proceed only after the site has been dewatered. Observation wells should be installed to evaluate the effectiveness of the dewatering system. - GeoEngineers, Inc. -I We anticipate that the trench excavation will extend to about Elevation 18 feet, including a two-foot allowance for pile cap construction in the area under study. Based on the results of the explorations, it appears that the bottom of the granular fill along this portion of the alignment ranges from Elevation 20 to 24 feet. Therefore, most of the cut will be in sandy soils. We estimate that trench slopes in these materials may stand as steep 1 X:1 to 1 f4:1 (horizontal to vertical). However, flatter slopes are r-• expected to be necessary if seepage which cannot be controlled by dewatering is 1 ; encountered. It should be the contractor's responsibility to monitor the trench excavation and provide flatter slopes or shoring, as necessary, for safety. Material excavated from the trench can be used as backfill providing that it is not too wet to handle. The upper two feet of the trench backfill should consist of well- compacted granular material to provide a stable surface for later site development. USE OF THIS REPORT AND WARRANTY We have prepared this report for use by Renton Village Company and their L') engineers in the design of the project. The data and report should be provided to t prospective contractors for bidding or estimating purposes, but our report, conclusions and interpretations should not be construed as a warranty of the subsurface conditions. If there are changes in the grades, location, configuration or type of construction, -17 the conclusions and recommendations presented in this report may not be fully i.: applicable. If such changes are made, we should be given the opportunity to review our conclusions and recommendations and to provide written modification or verification of these recommendations. When design is finalized, , we recommend that we be given the opportunity to review the final design and specifications to see that our recommenda- ri tions have been interpreted and implemented as intended. The scope of our work does not include services related to construction safety precautions and our recommendations are not intended to direct the contractor's methods, techniques, sequences or procedures, except as specifically described in our report for consideration in design. The re are possible variations in subsurface conditions between the locations of the explorations. Some contingency for unanticipated conditions should be included in the project budget and schedule. We recommend that sufficient monitoring, testing and consultation should be provided by our firm during construction to confirm that the [1] conditions encountered are consistent with those indicated by the explorations, to provide recommendations for design changes should the conditions revealed during construction differ from those anticipated, and to evaluate whether or not earthwork ' and foundation installation activities comply with the contract plans and specifications. - S - GeoEngineers, Inc. j • Within the limitations of scope, schedule and budget for our services, we warrant that our work has been done in accordance with generally accepted practices followed in this area at the time the report was prepared. No other warranty, express or implied, is made. If there are any questions concerning this report or if we can provide additional services, please call. Respectfully submitted, (fO;;4f\ TVG Engineers, Inc. B. ;--/ I - ames B. Thompso ` S= .• • Engi�n/eer NA Ike op 44,10 --- ANAL too �50.0�10,1~ filk K. Tuttle esident JBT:JKT:wd Attachments t - 1 j J d 1 - 6 - GeoEnglneers, Inc. . , • , . • . , PLATE 1 - ' - ..1 .. „ . , x. . . .. - • „ , . I_. ,.'.'.c_. .• . -. ____- _ _ _ ...,._ • ._ _ /PUGETROWER _ WITCHING STATION i X X i - ... _:-.. M.( H-P,-€--6• 1-1• 11(+0 0- ' • -. - . — —______--7. . ---- - ------- - 7-7-7 , . - . -- —,___ '". ': - - Ls 1 cf.) ,.._. - - . 1 w> PAY-N7SAVE . _ : , • • rx ., i.--------- " '- . „. . . XISTI 8: .. ,. ., ,. _. . . .. ' - - E \1 - , ' \ -. •• "-7. - „ _ , , 10+0 I Ln , " '4-2" „.., - , : :: \ \ - - . . CONCRETE PIPE 1 j 0 , . - - . PROPOSED , VAULT - .r‘• -.:.-z 0— = _.•\.___,_-....„ i '35 '' '' l' + -'-'' 1 ' 1 :- ) - `' - ---------__ i i . II vlil . . ......--/-- 0 vPAsuPLLT'' ' - - '') ' i . : - PSPL : r: ‘'' 1(1-: fril-il 4411111_1171 6 .8::: VII -. VAULT 0+00 ' . 1+0.0 (. - ,. . :2-+00: 3+00 (.._ 4+00i - 5+00 6+00 -, .:- +00 \. ._ -- SOUTH RENTON VILLAGE PLACE 2'. .50 --,---.. 35 1 . , - - • 5 '. ; 3 EXPLANATION: _ 0 - . .. . ._ . . . - J —BORING w.,-,LocATIo ,AND . Num6ER 0 60 60, .-, DIRECTION OF StRtAM ".FLOW . -' • , • . ,.- - _____ REFERENCE : •' SCALE IN FEET . ..; . „ DRAWING ENTITLED "EAST BASIN INTERCEPTOR J . STORM DRAIN, RENTON, WASHINGTON", . . : . . , BY JONES ASSOCIATES', INC . , .. ...,. DATED MARCH 5, 1982 & REVISED MAY 13, 1982 „ 2 GeoEngineers Inc. L - ' SITE - PLAN , • . PLATE 2. • F- - • C W - . - Q W 5.y 1. W W. 111 lL'• I' S':;I I S I 1' I . • I 1 I. 1 . n W pp' .. m �`. ll - O m FILL JFI S ' • PEAT WITH LAYERS INTERLAYERED ' , ' - • OF SAND 'AND : _ SILTY" SAND; , _ ORGAN I G 'SILT.:. SAND :AND PEAT+ , S - -- • I LTY"SAND `^ I— w c" r-� _ SILTY ' SAND WITH ORGANICS- —p w ob : 'RF 1. " ' . EATLAYERS r SILT 1— "�. FINE TO: MEDIUM SAND �_ .. - T T�I L L -' " SAND r, - SAN,D,STONE , ....... ...".-...."-•••--' .......:"..... . . :. NOTE : HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1" 5.p ' `. THE STRATIGRAPHY SHOWN IS BASED' ON - INTERPOLATION BETWEEN" EXPLORATIONS • . '. - AND 'SHOULD BE CONSIDERED AS ACCURATE ONLY: AT EXPLORATION LOCATIONS • i l GeoEngineers Inc. " j� SUBSURFACE PROFILE - 1 'Jt� PLATE 3 BORING LOG AND SAMPLE DATA KEY DRIVEN SAMPLES - . BLOWS REQUIRED TO DRIVE SAMPLER ONE FOOT OR INDICATED - ! MOISTUREPENETRATION USING 250^POUND HAMMER FALLING 30 INCITES CONTENT "P" INDICATES SAMPLER PUSHED WITH WEIGHT OF HAMMER ' l 1 .2"Z 111 28 ::BORING NO. 11 USED 325 POUND HAMMER • DRY DENSITY U INDICATES LOCATION OF UNDISTURBED SAMPLE • IN PCF ® INDICATES LOCATION OF DISTURBED SAMPLE 0 INDICATES LOCATION OF SAMPLING GRAPHIC LOG ATTEMPT WITH NO RECOVERY LETTER SYMBOL SM SOIL TYPE OTHER TYPES OF SAMPLES DISTINCT CONTACT INDICATES LOCATION OF THIN WALL, BETWEEN SOIL STRATA PITCHER, OR OTHER TYPES OF SAMPLES • (SEE TEXT) / GRADUAL CHANGE BETWEEN SOIL STRATA BOTTOM OF BORING UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM MAJOR DIVISIONS LETTER DESCRIPTIONS SYMBOL GRAVEL .ELL-GRACED GRAVELS. GRAVEL-SAND AND CLEAN GRAVELS GW MIXTURES. LITTLE OR►D FINES COARSE GRAVELLY - GRAINED SOILS (LITTLE CR to FINEST GP Po:PLY D GRAVELS. GAVEL- _ WO MIXTURES. LITTLE OR PD FINES • SOILS Mow TWA 50% GRAVELS _ GM SILTY GRAVELS. CARAVEL-SMO-SILT OF COARSE FRAC- WITH FINES minors TICg>I ON PC.. SIEVE tAPPRVAABLE NOWT OF FI'VSI GC CLAYEY GRAVELS. GRAVEL•SAMO-SILT MIXTURES SAND CLEAN SANDS SW YELL GRACED SMOS. GRAVELLY SANDS. AND LITTLE ER NO FIFES SANDY SOILS (LITTLE ER PC FINEST MORE TTV{N sox Sp PootLT-EPArco SMOs.GRAVELLY SANDS. OF MATERIAL IS LITTLE ER NO FINES LAME TAN PC. MORE THAN SOS Roo SIEVE SIZE OF COARSE FRAC- SANDS SM SILTY SANDS. SAND-SILT MIXTIES TIC PACSTNR WITH FINES `O.ASIEVE (APPRECIABLE MOUNT CV FINEST SC CLAYEY SANDS, svc.(T-AY MIXTURES ML IMONGANIC SILTS. AND VERY FOE SANDS. J� FINE SILTS ( A FLOUR. SILTY CR CLAYEY FINE j SANDS OR CLAYEY SILTS WITH sLIGMT GRAINED AND LIQUID LIMIT PLASTICITY LESS ' SOILS CLAYS THAN 50 INORGANIC CLAYS OF LOG,TD MEDIUm CL PLASTIcm.GRAVELLY CLAYS. SANDY j curs.SILTY CLAYS. LEAN CLAYS OL ORGANIC SILTS AND ORGANIC SILTY CLAYS CF LOW PLASTICm j SILTS INORGANIC SILTS. MICACEOUS OR DIATD- LIQUID LIMIT MH JNO M ACEOUS FRPE SAND C SILTY SOILS TORE TIAN eox LOF ERRIT Ito. AND GREATER CH IPORGANIC CLAYS O'HIGH PLasncm too SIEVE SIZE CLAYS THAN 50 FAT CLAYS '1 • i OH PORGANLASTICITY.n,CR AANNIC SILTTO s1O' HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS PT PEAT. HUMUS. SO*SOILS WITH HIGH ORGANIC COd?TMS DOTE, DUAL SYMBOLS INDICATE BORDERLINE SOIL CLASSIFICATION GeoEngineers Inc. UNIFIED DNSSOIL LYCLASSIFICATION ONASYSTEM " - I [1 PLATE 4 • BORING NO . 6 ELEVATION : 29 FEET *GRAPHIC *TEST DATA LOC DESCRIPTION 0 - BROWNISH GRAY SILTY SAND WITH GRAVEL (LOOSE, DAMP) (FILL) 6 mm SM 33% 81 DARK BROWN SILTY SAND WITH ORGANIC MATTER ' 5 — (LOOSE, DAMP) r-- SM 3 H fs. 10 -. Z a 2 GRADES TO WET WITH THIN LENSES OF SANDY PEAT ' 15 — 2 PT DARK BROWN PEAT AND SANDY PEAT WITH LENSES OF • 52% 59 . FINE TO MEDIUM SAND (VERY SOFT, DAMP) 20 — / 5 SW GRAY FINE TO COARSE SAND WITH GRAVEL . (LOOSE, WET) SM BROWN SILTY FINE TO MEDIUM SAND WITH ABUNDANTH 25 " ORGANIC MATTER (LOOSE, WET) I4 14 30% 91 SP LIGHT GREENISH GRAY FINE TO MEDIUM SAND 30— (LOOSE TO MEDIUM DENSE, SATURATED) N L . 4 • 20% 102 41 ---- GP LIGHT GREENISH GRAY. SANDY FINE TO MEDIUM GRAVEL 40— -- (DENSE, SATURATED) *SEE KEY FOR EXPLANATION OF SYMBOLS GeoEngineers Inc. Lon OF EXPLORATION • PLATE 5 BORING NO. 6 CONT 'D i~ *GRAPHIC *TEST DATA LOG DESCRIPTION 40 66 6” SP LIGHT GRAY TO SILTY MEDIUM SAND (VERY DENSE, 1,1 SATURATED) (WEATHERED SANDSTONE) 4 - BORING COMPLETED AT A DEPTH OF 44 FEET ON 5 6/ 15/82 GROUNDWATER LEVEL OBSERVED AT 111i FEET DURING DRILLING V. 50 -1 z 55 r.. L ! L 1.1 L. *SEE KEY FOR EXPLANATION OF SYMBOLS GeoEngineers Inc. . LOG OF EXPLORATION PLATE h BORING NO. 7 ELEVATION : 2612. FEET *GRAPHIC *TEST DATA LOG DESCRIPTION 0 i 3 24° 98 II SM BROWN AND GRAYISH BROWN. SILTY SAND WITH WOOD (LOOSE, DAMP) (FILL) i 5 _ / [12 II ML BROWNISH GRAY SANDY SILT AND SILTY SAND WITH ri w SM ORGANIC MATTER (SOFT, DAMP) 1 $. 10 "' z �t F 1 L , w 880 47 II GRADES WITH THIN LENSES OF SANDY PEAT a 15 f 2 I . 5 SP GRAY FINE TO MEDIUM SAND WITH TRACE OF SILT, AND SM ORGANIC MATTER (VERY LOOSE, SATURATED) 20 / . 3 45% 72 II SM 1NTERLAYERED SILTY SAND, DARK BROWN PEAT AND i I 25 PT GRAYISH BROWN SILTY PEAT (LOOSE; SOFT, DAMP TO SATURATED) PI J 2 80 0 50 II r) 30 j / i E1 6 Y 22% 106 ll ML GREENISH GRAY TO BROWNISH GRAY SANDY SILT' ±� (MEDIUM STIFF TO STIFF, DAMP) II 35 - Li 19 II SM GREENISH GRAY TO GRAY SILTY FINE TO MEDIUM SAN D 40 — �,-- (MEDIUM . DENSE TO DENSE, SATURATED) L *SEE KEY FOR EXPLANATION OF SYMBOLS rGeoEngineers Inc. LOG OF EXPLORATION 7).LATf 7 BORING NO. 7 CONT 'D *GRAPHIC • 40 *TEST DATA LOG DESCRIPTION 25 20% 11211 SP LIGHT GREENISH GRAY 'FINE TO MEDIUM SAND (MEDIUM DENSE, DAMP) 45- 12 E-4 • - BORING COMPLETED AT A DEPTH OF 49 FEET ON t 50 6/ 16/82 z GROUNDWATER LEVEL OBSERVED AT 151/2 FEET DURING DRILLING C21 5 5 JD -14) 1 j *SEE KEY FOR EXPLANATION OF SYMBOLS GeoEngineers Inc. LOG OF EXPLORATION JJ PLATE 8 BORING NO. 8 ELEVATION: 28 FEET *GRAPHIC 0 *TEST DATA LOG DESCRIPTION 4 • 140 117 II SM GRAYISH BROWN SILTY SAND WITH GRAVEL ., (LOOSE, DAMP) (FILL) 5 — / 3 PT DARK BROWN TO GRAYISH BROWN SILTY PEAT WITH E`. SAND LENSES (SOFT, DAMP-) ! 10 _ 2 a 127% 35 � 15 ., GRADES WITH LENSES OF SILTY SAND AND ORGANIC SILT 2 211% 23 II 20- - [ j / 5 SP LIGHT GREENISH GRAY FINE TO MEDIUM SAND 25 (LOOSE, SATURATED) 3 400 79 OL GRAYISH BROWN ORGANIC SILT WITH SAND LENSES SP (SOFT, DAMP) 30 — 11 ML GREENISH GRAY SANDY SILT (MEDIUM STIFF, DAMP) 20% 109 35 — SM BROWN SILTY SAND WITH ABUNDANT ORGANIC MATTER (MEDIUM DENSE, WET) c: SP LIGHT GREENISH GRAY FINE TO MEDIUM SAND 40 — (MEDIUM DENSE, SATURATED) *SEE KEY FOR EXPLANATION OF SYMBOLS I ? GeoEngineers Inc. LOG OF EXPLORATION NATE 01 BORING NO. 8 CONT 'D *GRAPHIC 40 *TEST DATA LOG DESCRIPTION 5 39% 82 II ML GRAY TO GREENISH GRAY CLAYEY SILT WITH LENSES OF FINE SAND (MEDIUM STIFF, DAMP) 45- 25 II SM GRAY SILTY SAND WITH GRAVEL (MEDIUM DENSE TO DENSE, DAMP) (TILL) z 77 8" 0.42E:4 ED SM LIGHT GRAY SILTY FINE TO MEDIUM SAND = ---- (VERY DENSE, WET) (SANDSTONE) 55-1 BORING COMPLETED AT A DEPTH OF 54 FEET ON 6/15/82 GROUNDWATER LEVEL OBSERVED AT 12 FEET DURING DRILLING - 60— • co p . t41 *SEE KEY FOR EXPLANATION OF SYMBOLS GeoEngineers Inc. LOG OF EXPLORATION PLATE 10 BORING NO . 9 ELEVATION : 28'2 FEET *GRAPHIC 0 *TEST DATA LOG DESCRIPTION 19 6% 115 II SM GRAYISH BROWN SILTY SAND WITH GRAVEL (MEDIUM DENSE, DAMP) (FILL) 1 5 - i 3 132% 34 II PT DARK BROWN SILTY PEAT (SOFT, DAMP) w10 ^ z 2 66% 57 II • GRADES WITH LENSES OF SAND AND SILTY SAND - 7 15 - i 1. 2 710 56 • 20 - 4 Ld I. SM BROWNISH GRAY SLIGHTLY SILTY FINE TO MEDIUM SAND WITH ORGANIC MATTER (LOOSE, DAMP) :, 25 0 3 37% 82 II SM BROWN SILTY SAND WITH ABUNDANT ORGANIC MATTER ,^' AND LAYERS OF GRAYISH BROWN SANDY SILT c 30 " (LOOSE, DAMP) L 11 35 - 14 ak. 22% 107 II SP ..LIGHT GREENISH GRAY FINE TO MEDIUM SAND (LOOSE TO MEDIUM DENSE, SATURATED) *SEE KEY FOR EXPLANATION OF SYMBOLS GeoEngineers Inc. I LOG OF EXPLORATION H • PLATE 11 r-- BORING NO. 9 CONT 'D *GRAPHIC 40 *TEST DATA LOG DESCRIPTION 1 25 6" gl SP 45 .- 7 GP GREENISH GRAY SANDY GRAVEL (MEDIUM DENSE, 79 — • SATURATED) ag SM LIGHT GRAY SILTY SAND (VERY DENSE, DAMP) ri • E-1 (SANDSTONE) t 50 BORING COMPLETED AT A DEPTH OF 49 FEET ON 6/15/82 csa GROUNDWATER LEVEL OBSERVED AT 12 FEET DURING = DRILLING r""1 55 fl c-1 IS . . *SEE KEY FOR EXPLANATION OF SYMBOLS . • GeoEngineers Inc. LOG OF EXPLORATION L^^ / L- A Z ' ^ BORING NO . lO ELEVATION : 29/a FEET *GRAPHIC *TEST DATA LOG DESCRIPTION ' 5 15% Ill SM BROWN SLIGHTLY SILTY FINE TO COARSE SAND WITH Sp GRAVEL (LOOSE, DAMP) (FILL) 5 � ~_ / . 5 620. PT DARK BROWN SILTY SANDY PEAT WITH WOOD (SOFT, �- .4., DAMP)� � lO - / ss 6 '5M LIGHT GREENISH GRAY SILTY FINE TO MEDIUM SAND ' (LOOSE, WET) _ l5 ~~ l3 \ / 240. 103 �� ! �~ 2O ~~ ' ' 7 GRADES TO SILTY FINE SAiND WITH LENSES OF CLAYEY _ SILT �v 25 ~~ 00 `~ BORING COMPLETED AT A DEPTH OF 24 FEET ON -n� 6/ 16/82 -�� GROUNDWATER LEVEL OBSERVED AT 71u FEET DURING DRILLING 3U~~ �] K% � � , *SEE KEY FOR E%9LANAJI00 OF SY14BOLS ������ Inc.n�eoEn��N m LOG OF EXPLORATION t'LMI h 1 ) BORING NO. 11 ELEVATION: 26 FEET r hV *GRAPHIC ' *TEST DATA LOG DESCRIPTION 0 SP BROWN SLIGHTLY SILTY SAND WITH GRAVEL SM (DRY TO DAMP, LOOSE) (FILL) 2 . SM BLACK SILTY SAND WITH ABUNDANT ORGANIC MATTER AND TRACE GRAVEL (LOOSE, DAMP TO WET) (FILL) . , 5 SP GRAY FINE TO MEDIUM SAND (LOOSE, WET) f II ML BROWNISH GRAY PEATY SILT WITH PEAT LENSES ' cw OLD, (SOFT, WET) L z 10 — SP GRAY MEDIUM SAND (LOOSE, WET) M P E 2 a w II PT BROWN PEAT (SOFT, WET) a 15 .. 17 SP GRAY FINE TO MEDIUM SAND (LOOSE, WET) Fl II N 20 [.r. ' .0 10 . i� II SP ML LAYERS OF BROWN GRAY SILT WITH ORGANIC MATTER `� AND DARK BROWN PEAT (SOFT) �5 � _ PT ri6 11 0 30 CM [i 10 { 1 35 ' • •U ' [-] II . 40 _ l Li *SEE KEY FOR EXPLANATION OF SYMBOLS GeoEngineers Inc. LOG OF EXPLORATION • ' L� PLATE 14 BORING NO. 11 CONT ' D *GRAPHIC *TEST DATA LOG DESCRIPTION 40 i-- DECREASING LAYERS OF SILT AND PEAT 19 SP • 45 l. l.; • 7 50 ' z H 9 F.I A LAYERS OF GREENISH GRAY CLAYEY SILT (MEDIUM STIFF) 55 " 13 SM GRAY SILTY FINE TO MEDIUM SAND (LOOSE, WET) r, U - SM GRAY SILTY FINE TO COARSE SAND AND GRAVEL 60 (MEDIUM DENSE, WET) (WEATHERED TILL) 1 : 32 ® PIECES OF SANDSTONE 121 65 5„ SP LIGHT GRAY WEATHERED SANDSTONE (VERY DENSE) 111 70 ~ BORING COMPLETED AT A DEPTH OF 66i FEET ON } . 6/22/82 l GROUNDWATER OBSERVED AT 6 FEET DURING DRILLING Ii • 1 L, *SEE KEY FOR EXPLANATION OF SYMBOLS • GeoEngineers Inc. LOG OF EXPLORATION PLATE 15 PRESSURE (LBS/FT2 x 103) • 1 . 2 ,3 ,4 .5 1 2 3 4 5 10 20 30 40 50 T - 1 I I I t 1 I _ I I I I I I I I t l I \ t 1 . 1 • 1 \t I I I I.__, I I I \ I I . x \ I I • I I I 1-1 i t 1 0 I I z1-4 ( 1 . 2 . .a_. II II o \-"41 HII A .0 ' i o . 0 I . . I I I I i I 1 . 3 t I I I I I I I t I i i I I t t I . I I i I- . pSampl I I Boring Depth Soil Moisture Densit y 1 Key Number (Fr ) Classification Content Lbs/Ft3 6 18 PT 52% 59 9 18 PT 71° 56 GeoEngineers Inc. CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS V) I W Q Dp OJpep� `9 qb°° jl �� N U �s... °° °p J �gtib 6 42 ui P. ti cc cc PI � ` Sy P 1 11 QP 12g50 70) n ET', z-je-t p 166g0 /' �3,bpl 171 `% .00 a Ol p2Z0 . (610) n o 0 II 02 g01 l�q►0,_ o _ , `,..I.0 0 II °) 00O .... ..1 Y1 O O00 (5601 0 0 n....1 o,0 •-•OO 1 /' `�qt° 4."yl �o 0o y�� t (240) 000 �000 n• (i2o1 rt.in ] �13001 000 0nCA �:ar :N� rn 1880 J I 8030 �n� ona p n N v..o 1 N,,,r rN (10) [290] 1 d Dr a_________ . .2140 I I .1 1 ii 5 n `N�Es'irS AO 0 a 0 cc 1 1- 0 CO a � I' 000 000 Wnn.. Nn�oII li N..... LLp----------- ulN.+Nv ..} 600r 75601 W (20) (1290)J ole0} i [ 90] N (120) Q 510 5820 W 0oo 000 0 ONI .nrF. n�p v.r ..1.�p O 1) r I LEGEND xxxx Average Weekday Volumes (xxx) A.M. Peak Hour Volumes (xxx] P.M. Peak Hour Volumes il FIGURE 3 II --- Direction of Travel • 1986 TRAFFIC VOLUMES I . 6 1 CHM HILL .I Puget Drive--indicates unsatisfactory traffic operating conditions during both the a.m. and the p.m. peak hours (LOS D or E/F) , with the exception of Grady Way/Access Point A which operated at LOS A (a.m. peak) and LOS D (p.m. peak) . For all signalized intersections, the LOS calculations are based on Webster' s formulation for the calculation of volume/capacity (v/c) ratios . The calculIted v/c ratios are then related -to LOS grades as follows : Maximum f v/c Ratio LOS 0 to 60% A 61 to 70% B 71 to 80% C 81 to 90% D 91 to 100% E Over 100% F The methodology used for calculating the LOS at one-way, stop-controlled intersections is summarized in Appendix B. Table 1 SUMMARY OF EXISTING LEVEL OF SERVICE LOS (V/C) Intersection A.M. Peak P.M. Peak Rainier/Gradya E (96%) F (124%) Lake/Gradya D (91%) E (94%) Shattuck/Gradya D (84%) E (94%) Talbot/Gradya E (94%) E (100%) • Talbot/Pugeta F (144%) F (125%) Talbot/Renton Village Place E (NA) E (NA) Grady/Access Point A A (NA) D (NA) aSignalized intersection. bUnsignalized intersection. • 1F. V. Webster. Traffic Signal Settings. Road Research Technical Paper No. 39. 1961 . • 2Interim Materials on Highway Capacity. Transportation Research Board Circular No. 212. January 1980. se5701vv4 7 • Pedestrian and Bicycle Activity it Field observations indicate that pedestrian and bicycle acti- vity in the project impact area is insignificant. There are �I no special provisions for pedestrians besides handicap ramps at signalized intersections . No bicycle routes are desig- nated along any major arterials. ., ,I Transit Service I'� it I , Transit service is provided near the site by Metro. Route 247L provides peak-hour service on Grady Way and five other routes I' (145, 148, 149, 155, and 156) provide service on Talbot Road I - at the project site. The South Renton Park and Ride is op- II erating on the north side of Grady Way between Lake Avenue 1 ' and Shattuck Avenue. It is assumed that only 2 percent of ;il the employees would arrive at the proposed office building ; l by transit during the peak hour. I ' I . FUTURE CONDITIONS TRIP GENERATION I ' • I Trip generation rates for the proposed office building are based on ITE' s Trip Generation, Third Edition, 1982 . The manual indicates an office building with 100, 000 to 199,999 gross square feet (GSF) will generate approximately 14 . 3 average weekday vehicle trip ends per 1 ,000 GSF based I on an employee density of 4 . 2/1,000 GSF. The Three Renton I Place building will employ 800 people in 131 ,000 GSF; this 1', results in an employee density of 6. 1/1 , 000 GSF. Because of the higher employee density at the proposed facility, the i1 average weekday vehicle trip end rate shown in the ITE man_ { , ual of 14 . 3/1 ,000 GSF was factored up to 20. 8/1 , 000 GSF for use in this study. Table 2 shows the comparisons of the ITE I''i trip rate and those used in this study. i It is estimated that the proposed facility will generate approximately 2,715 vehicle trip ends on an average weekday, it 380 trip ends during the morning peak hour, and about 385 trip ends during the afternoon peak hour. The trips generated by I the proposed facility during the day, morning peak hour, and 1! afternoon peak hour are summarized in Table 3 . II r, TRIP DISTRIBUTION I Trip distribution is the process of analyzing the influence '1 area of the proposed project with respect to the direction and, more specifically, the route likely taken by vehicles ' �I going to and from the proposed development. The 1990 travel desire prepared by the Department of Budget and Program Plan- ning, King County (King County Interim Transportation Plan-- Focus, 1990) , for the Renton area was used as a basic input f ii se5701vv5 8 �{ for the estimation of trip distribution from the site to the adjacent arterial streets. It was assumed that once on the adjacent arterials, the vehicles would be distributed ac- cording to the existing turning-movement ratios at the inter- sections. Travel times and site access points were also taken into consideration. Table 2 COMPARISON BETWEEN ITE TRIP RATE AND PROPOSED OFFICE TRIP RATE i Proposed Office ITE Trip Rate Trip Rate li Building size 100,000 to 131 , 000 GSF 199 ,999 GSF • Average weekday vehicle trip end rate 14 .3/1 ,000 GSF 20. 8/1 ,000 GSF A.M. enter 12. 5% 12. 5% A.M. exit 1 . 5% • 1 . 5% P.M. enter 2. 8% 2. 8% P.M. exit 11 .4% 11 .4% Employee density 4 .2/1 , 000 GSF 6. 1/1 , 000 GSF aFrom Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) . Trip Generation. Third Edition. 1982. Table 3 PROJECT TRIP GENERATION Daily trip generation: 2 , 725 trip ends A.M. peak-hour generation: 380 trip ends in : 340 trip ends out: 40 trip ends P.M. peak-hour generation: 385 trip ends 1 in : 75 trip ends out: 310 trip ends I� Note: Rounded to the nearest five trip ends. Figure 4 identifies the estimated trip distribution pattern. ,i This trip distribution pattern reflects the following basic assumptions. se5701vv6 9 i W a J (IS 0 o co uj tlil . aQ� 410 '1.1ti4'� .0 -N; '7w Q J GR � S. i L.........j It cri4azt — N38p t 4 a670 if (38%) 45 elm 3 ). 03% ^ /1 �� 6% 12% E.(7%)(12%)-� S.RENTON PL. ' 7.) Ca—D • - �g'(A��Ao5 No �N'�� o a 0 t- .CC:l\> m J 3 W W }, nr W r J N j H W LEGEND '' f 48% A.M. Peak (45%) P.M. Peak 1 il FIGURE 4 '1 TRIP DISTRIBUTION PATTERN i !I 10 WA HILL • 1 . For new trips generated (a.m. peak-hour) by the proposed Three Renton Place building, 9& percent would access the site from the west side of the study area, 22 percent from the northeast, and 30 percent from the south side of the proposed site. 2 . During the evening peak hour, 45 percent of the total trips exiting the proposed site would use Shattuck Avenue, about 2 to 3 percent would exit at two proposed access points along Grady Way, and 38 percent would leave the site through the east entrance along Talbot Road. It is estimated that 12 percent would exit at the proposed signalized intersection of Talbot Road/Renton Village Place. Using the estimated trip distribution pattern shown in Fig- ure 4 , the traffic anticipated to be generated by the pro- posed development during the two peak hours was distributed into the street system within the study area. Figures 5 and 6 summarize the distribution of project-generated traffic. For the purposes of the traffic impact analysis, the "1987 no-build" traffic volumes assume that the proposed project will not be built. The 1987 no-build volumes are provided II so that the relative magnitude of the project impacts can be understood. The "1987 build" volumes reflect the estimate of traffic generated by the proposed project. The estimated 1987 volumes for the study area are shown in Figures 7 and 8 . The background volumes were increased by about 3 percent over existing 1986 conditions to reflect projected 1987 con- ditions. According to City of Renton staff, this is consist- , ent with historical growth in the area. Traffic generated by Two Renton Place office building was also included into the background volumes. _ The result of the LOS analysis for estimated 1987 peak-hour conditions , both with and without the proposed facility, is presented in Table 4 . This tabulation indicates that the project itself causes insignificant changes in the level of service for any of the intersections studied. All inter- sections studied are expected to operate at LOS E-F with or without the building during both the morning and afternoon peak hours, with the exception of Grady Way/Access Point A. This intersection will operate at LOS A during the morning . peak hour with or without the project. Traffic leaving the site at Shattuck Avenue will pass through the commercial areas adjacent to the site. se5701vv7 11 J ll \ N � 1 cri c 1 I m EAST VSLRLESY7 FREEWAY 10—� �-10 R4i,�,�� O .- z 1 � R�`FS O o 3 0 ?Si (/j cri y a a a W LAKE AVE. S. • ; --)cda\ (115(25) r'S SHATTUCK AVE.S, VC N 0 'O !, 'n j 3 re � pr (10)^ r— a M m y y � M a) z• rn o���� � �f IW ) Z -N\ • 0r(40) TALBOT ROAD SOUTH 155 (80) 15--' _ `3 1 ( 1 C CA o __ 2 - --- • N W Q Y o 741 W ~ / h xcn py jL1 ...-..-,.‘.t°..3\ 0 5,G 25 (5),r,L ii e "0c/ie.-) '‘\ r....i ,(.. W�. (t0)1 -- . ,, ..`�pj �65� in ,0 �• 2O ? �\ ( y 1g o 4.2 (5J - (SIEG) U 1 N 0 s. . .7 eiCCI 1911--)--------'.----' - ". . tellsIPSE q05 0 �N a , o ' ,71:13.------- - cc al W W � ^n i0 -J a: _ J s — •. >� 5 - ' ''-50 a cn � i � .. W ' in LEGEND 15-- Inbound (25)-- Outbound FIGURE 5 ' SITE GENERATED TRIPS AM PEAK HOUR 13 ( kM HILL (ri u.i o\ • Y /e, A,B 00 l ltq��� ' J~ y = JBO OJ J O Vil LL150 �- :16- Q 410 ("7° _' G�,...„") , ctleiLi eta o) lsgo1 �'° 1 o 0.55 ' 10) tp6 q01 (i2so1 \ if0 a O `►301 (t0►Ol t1Sp0 n'r� o 0 o aim N t6z ^^ -- 1 J to 3 2 -- N ►660 o0o r^o! ono c'noI }..-. g+ :nr I1501 (250) o0o .-.-- re c0o .r• (270) tj601 ..•- N n n •P. 2360 c..,1,::,z=:).(_):............_............ O00 Nan v....n 0 N N r- N.......1 , 4 4 n v u N N 2620 N•� (20) (3901 • _ - F- • Nt��SZA/E 4°5 0 1 Q O CC m J C"kC****N.....)7.. 1.->IC1 F- W 000 000 W :" 7 0 •n Q 0 o 0 0 V. �,� 530 e230 J (20) (13e0) N (70--i —(1 N (90) �11010I) Q 540 6200 ) W o00 000 N A N A w • r N 1 V N f 0 A v '� LEGEND xxxx Average Weekday Volumes (xxx) A.M. Peak Hour Volumes FIGURE 7 [xxx] P.M. Peak Hour Volumes -- Direction of Travel PROJECTED 1987 TRAFFIC VOLUMES WITHOUT THE PROPOSED PROJECT 14 pfM HILL rn . o,!Iii 4� `qv^o-1 rr.a ire,4 a0 l�o aoo A. Cl; () c�i O 1 OJ 4 0 ju..4..„. J = JO OJ! OJ O J S.G�/ /,- „,.2. 00. IS. :Jo (J' . J 1►�01 (S) .. 0 (25] 20�'' \�3201 ri� (lOr� n o\13 ✓ 67p0 (100) ^n— (440� 1121p) 1Z o/.n JJ}} ( Nr�{10p0 eoo 000 .� M \1660 . .. I i000 ., n,o,n fNo 156j0 000 000 .0.ro„, —n �...0 ,o,..o }}000 oi.�. 10'" (1e0] i (2,0) oN..� I .� �. .. --^ (280) 1 3101 .... 000 "" rn 2540 6510 .OD,o nn.D • N.O O N..N II M.+N vrN «r„r 2700 (20) dali:D-I_ . . • , [400] _ • I}" N�,.,,ks E q05 c 0 .• 0 m 3 _170-1 — .C.1/4.4.N ..... I<>A-7 Q W o00 ct 000 O P W .1.I r�or. f s.N v.'N .r .. >"t` 530 eseo J (20) [1390] J� [eon] ( ) ) N (500)_ f (1090] 4 570 6560 (11 000 1 000 ..O,D M1oo P.v IN N f N CA A .. e LEGEND xxxx Average Weekday Volumes (xxx) A.M. Peak Hour Volumes [xxx] P.M. Peak Hour Volumes FIGURE e -- Direction of Travel PROJECTED 1986 TRAFFIC VOLUMES WITH THE PROPOSED PROJECT • 15 V NMHlu 1 The proposed development is not expected to have a signifi- cant adverse effect on traffic safety within the study area. . There may be a slight increase in the annual number of acci- dents, but this will be due more to an increase in the amount of exposure than to an increase in the risk associated with each exposure. Table 4 SUMMARY OF FUTURE LEVEL OF SERVICE (percent saturation) A.M. Peak P.M. Peak 1986 1986 1986 1986 Intersection No Build Build No Build Build Rainier/Gradya F (1010) F (102%) ' F (128%) F (134%) Lake/Grady E (93%) E (93%) E (95%) E (95%) '• Shattuck/Gradya E (92%) E (94%) E (95%) E (97%) Talbot/Gradya E (95%) E (95%) F (102%) F (105%) Talbot/Pugeta F (154%) F (160%) F (128%) F (133%) Talbot/Renton Placeb E (NA) . E (NA) F (NA) F (NA) Talbot/Renton Placebb C (74%) C (77%) E (94%) E (97%) Grady/Access Point A b A (NA) A (NA) E (NA) E (NA) Talbot/Access Point B NA E (NA) NA E (NA) aSignalized intersection. bUnsignalized intersection. cWith proposed signal. Impact on transit, bicycles, and pedestrian travel is not expected to be significant because of the current low level of travel by these modes. A traffic signal warrant analysis performed for the inter- section of Talbot Road South and Renton Village Place indi- cates that a signal would be warranted (Warrant 1 and 2-- Minimum Vehicular Volume and Interruption of Continuous Traffic , Manual of Traffic Signal Design, ITE, 1982) under the existing traffic conditions. An analysis of the future levels of service at the proposed signalized intersection of Talbot Road/Renton Village Place is also presented in Table 4 . The proposed signal would im- prove the level of service to LOS C during the a.m. peak hour, but would be at LOS E during the p.m. peak hour under both-build and no-build conditions. " l� se5701vv8 16 • l MITIGATION MEASURES To ensure safe and efficient movement of traffic and pedes- trians within the study area, the following traffic- opera- tional improvements are proposed. o Access Point B--approaching movement to Talbot Road South should consist of a separate right-turn l lane and a left-turn lane. o Install -a traffic signal on Talbot Road at Renton Village Place. The installation should include an interconnect with the existing signals at Talbot Road/Grady Way and Talbot Road/Puget Drive. II o Provide speed-limit signing within Renton Village. I o Establishment of a carpool/vanpool program should encourage employees at the proposed site to use this alternative rather than single-occupant vehicles for their work trips. The proposed development is expected to be used by The Boeing Company. Boeing encourages the use of carpool/ vanpool programs. UNAVOIDABLE ADVERSE IMPACTS o The proposal will cause a slight increase in traffic on surrounding streets. o The increased traffic will increase the degree of satu- ration by approximately 1 to 6 percent at surrounding intersections. o The traffic generated by the proposal will contribute to the need to provide transportation improvements in the area. CONCLUSION • The proposed site would add some 380 new morning peak-hour ,I trips and 385 afternoon peak-hour trips, amounting to an approximate 3 percent increase in total approaches at each intersection within the impact area. Construction of the proposed site would not change the level of service at any of the intersections in the impact study area; however, the degree of saturation would increase slightly at several locations. Based on the results of the traffic-impact analysis shown in this study, the proposed Three Renton Place office building can be developed with minimal impacts on the existing street system and traffic operations. se5701vv9 17 APPENDIX A LEVEL-OF-SERVICE DEFINITIONS TWO-LANE ROADWAYS Level of Service Characteristics A Operating speeds at or near the posted speed limit. Little or no intersection delay. B Operating speeds approaching the posted speed limit. Some delay at intersections because of turning movements. C Operating speeds may be reduced because of conflicts with other vehicles. Intersection delay will increase, particularly for left- turn movements or crossing traffic at unsig- nalized intersections. D Approaching unstable flow. Operating speeds may vary considerably. Conflicts with turn- ing vehicles may cause slowdowns or occa- sional stoppages. Considerable delay can be expected at intersections for vehicles wish- ing _ ! to cross the main traffic flow. E Unstable flow. Operating speeds will vary from 15 mph to 30 mph. Occasional stoppages can be expected because of conflicts with turning movements. Significant delay will be experienced by traffic at intersections • attempting to cross the main traffic flow. F Forced congested flow with unpredictable characteristics. Typical operating speed below 15 mph. Source: A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets. 1984 . se5701ww1 f � � ► APPENDIX B LEVEL-OF-SERVICE METHODOLOGY i UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS LOS The methodology used for calculating the LOS at one-way and two-way, stop-controlled intersections is based on informa- tion contained in Transportation Research Board Circular 212, Interim Materials . on Highway Capacity (January 1980) . For these nonsignalized intersections, LOS is defined differ- ently from that for signalized intersections in that it is • based upon the concept of "reserve capacity. " Specifically, the definition shown in the table below has been recommended for use. The reserve-capacity concept applied only to an individual traffic movement (or shared-lane movement) . Once the capacity of all the individual movements has been calcu- lated and their LOS and expected delay determined, an over- all evaluation of the intersection can be made. Normally, the movement with the worst LOS defines the overall evalua- tion, but this may be tempered by engineering judgment. This is particularly true in cases where the most critical movement serves a very minor percentage of the total traffic entering the intersection. Past experience with the unsig- nalized analysis procedures indicates that this methodology is very conservative and that it tends to overestimate the magnitude of any potential problems that might exist. " 1 Therefore, the result of any unsignalized intersection analysis should be reviewed with this thought in mind. Table B-i LEVEL OF SERVICE FOR UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Level of Reserve • Service Capacity Expected Traffic Delay 1 A 400 or more Little or no delay B 300 to 399 Short traffic delays C 200 to 299 Average traffic delays D 100 to 199 Long traffic delays E 0 to 99 Very long traffic delays F Less than 0 Failure; extreme congestion se5701xx1 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT Audrey De Jo i e , being first duly sworn on oath states that THIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE he/she is the Chief Clerk of the COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE SEC- OND FLOOR OF CITY HALL. RENTON, WASHINGTON ON MAY 6, 1986.AT 9 00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING VALLEY NEWSPAPERS PETITIONS: � THE CALLISON PARTNERSHIP, LTD. Application to rezone 15.44 acres from i^ Daily News Journal, Daily Record Chronicle, Daily Globe News G-1,General Use,and H-1 Heavy Indust- •• rial, to B-1, Business Use, to allow future '` Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week.That said newspapers "III Renton Place" office building and • zoning compliance with II Renton Place are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six (file R-016-86): property located at south- months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published west corner of South Grady Way and in the English language continuallyas dailynewspapers in Kent KingTalbot Road South. ` g THE CALLISON PARTNERSHIP, LTC County, Washington. Valley Newspapers have been approved as legal Application for site plan approval to • newspapers by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for constructofficeSA-032-86);buildingrp (IIIy Renton Place) ' (file property located at the .. King County. southwest corner of South Grady Way and in Talbot Road South. .. Legal descriptions of the files noted The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Daily News above are on file in the Renton Building and Zoning Department. • Journal , Daily Record Chronicle -> , Daily Globe News , (and ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID a, not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRE- • Ssubscribers duringthe below statedperiod. The annexed notice a MAY AT THE,AT PUBLIC HEARING ON N MAY 6,1986, 9:00 A.M.TO EXPRESS Notice f Public Je a rind published THEIR OPINIONS. was p Ronald G. Nelson on April 25, 1966 R1535 Building and Zoning Director Published in the Daily Record Chronicle April 25, 1986 R1535 The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $ 2b• 73 • Subscribed and sworn to before me this 28th day of April 19 36 N y Public for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, CITY OF RFNTOA KingCounty, Washington. r o �i y g LU VN M87 Revised 10�84 MAY 9 286 3U!L DiNIG/?nnr11G CErT. Pis -c RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON,WASHINGTON AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION THE REA NTON HEARINGG ILL BE HELD BY EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUN- CIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND Audrey DeJoie , being first duly sworn on oath states that FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON ON APRIL 29, 1986. AT he/she is the Chief Clerk of the 9:OOA.M.TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOW- ING PETITIONS: VALLEY OFFICE AND INDUSTRIAL VALLEY NEWSPAPERS PARK, INC.(AUSTIN CO.) PHASE II Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of'a four story Daily News Journal, Daily Record Chronicle, Daily Globe News office building of 140,000 square feet (file SA-017-86): property located at Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week.That said newspapers 1601 East Valley Road. THE CALLISON PARTNERSHIP, are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six LTD. months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published Application to rezone 15.44 acres of propertyto in the English language continuallyas dailynewspapers in KingB-1. Business fre Hs Heavy Industrial p- gKent, B-1. Use,for future develop- County, Washington. Valley Newspapers have been approved as legal ment of "Ill Renton Place" and to newspapers by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for enable zoning compliance for "II Re- nton King County. located Place" theleso hwesstt corner86): er off South Grady Way and Talbot Road South. The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Daily News Legal descriptions of the files noted above Journal____, Daily Record Chronicle X , Daily Globe News_, (and Zre on file inthe Renton Building and Zoning Department. not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice a SEN INVITED EA PR SENTT A TST THHEE PUBLIC HEARING O N ANN Notice of Public Jiearinb was published APRIL 29, 1986, AT 9:00 A.M. TO EX- PRESS THEIR OPINIONS. on April 18, 1986 R1 51)1 Ronald G. Nelson Building and Zoning Director Published in the Daily Record Chronicle April 18, 1986. R1514 The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $ 28 .22 Subscribed and sworn to before me this �3rd day of tiprihq 86 Nota y Public for the State of Washington, CITY OF f (NTO'•I residing at Federal Way, ((� (� t �] ------��� King County, Washington. l�� ►ti 14! VN I87 Revised 10/84 MAY 9 1986 RU!!DSNG/ZO^:iNG DEPT 1? I ci 2 -ocy - Vto - ff0AFEIDAVIT OF PUBLICATI®N ° - m - m0 no . I ® Om Sm 4, m P, m m »'7 m °' OD? W 7 MI Z Q 'T7. udre y De Jo i e being first duly sworn on oath states th e ` o H•o O n b g' $m o y Z+ o°m m ,D Cr- he/she is the Chief Clerk of the c a?m m (To --N v st 68 z o,-m o n' Krtairn ro o, o e -e xo rn� m 7mDo m E D3Zat< Z VALLEY NEWSPAPERS 3 s N a o x * m°V)m D D 0 O m•Ian, * ,i3, .. 'oc ma ^.* ..4 mZA f�uv _.f Daily News Journal, Daily Record Chronicle, Daily Globe News c N o � 0 a Q-0 3 a o o o o - Z 032.03 cI 3 - moo3Z ' D Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week. That said newspaper ,7 in , 3 g n '9 70•• a 3 r- are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than s o m 4$ m 2, 2 g k; p ' / months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and publish( in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, Kir v-0 94 n(00;, )o rn�.11 z�m i g CD Count Washington. ValleyNewspapers have been approved as leg2 Q= m -.a d g 5.�,.. _ 2 �7 n m- g Y, gPP � � � wm�0� � cog�?I newspapers by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington f1 m m-at.m o pa° _ 'O D s k > > �m3 f. cooAr ro King County. «�3.3 .o G)�'4 ii m N c roy3 w _—m - —a'!n n) Q mo gl co P 'aw �c.m a Z 9 5 The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Daily Nev og 6�- g r g D a o"o -o ° ro�D o°-' �� w Ica m m Journal , Daily Record Chronicle i, , Daily Globe News , (ar mCR L m a m i v m = 1 .-4 O fD -f DC.7 � � O m � c to Z m not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to i o i s� as a a s Q a„ F a 5— subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice a -m 9 p f N r m 0 OcDmv n7 vN m- —0 = K Notice of Environmental Determi nat . nn waspublishe o.$0 F o r °o�,D m N -° S on 1986 R1482 a = w0 � � °o �° , r , i:arch 31 , m = oco 3 T, 33 o w n The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $23. 76 . _.------i;:ii" :...i —e____72,....4..,--j."--- ---77"-e:::- Subscribed and sworn to before me this 2nd day of Apri 119 86 . ' - y.-...--(e- (r2- 6 - ----''''. :2. "6 NtStary Public for the State of Washington, Ci;Y OF 7 c:a residing at Federal Way, 1 D. _ ' P. ��I F, R King County, Washington. (� i b VN#87 Revised 10:84 'i� j MAY Q NPR BUILDING/ZONING DEPT L(-1 OF R , THE CITY OF RENTON U MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 o rn BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • MAXINE E.MOTOR, -Po `O• CITY CLERK • (206) 235-2501 ,40, SEPS �P June 12, 1986 Mr. Richard King, AIA • . The Callison Partnership, Ltd. 1423 3rd Avenue Suite 300 Seattle, Washington 98101 RE: City of Renton - Ordinance No. 3996 - The Callison Partnership, Ltd. - R-016-86 Dear Mr. King: The requested rezone was officially approved by the Renton City ' Council at its regular meeting of June 2, 1986, by adoption of Ordinance No. 3996. A copy of the ordinance is enclosed for your records. If we can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, CITY OF RENTON Maxine E. Motor, CMC City Clerk cc: Hearing Examiner Building and Zoning Enclosure MEM/gn Thomas A. Goeltz, Davis Wright & Jones 2600 Century Square 'or RA, 1501 Fourth Avenue �� Seattle, Washington - .._1)1-1688 0 O OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK t- 480Z ., City of Renton 0 200 Mill Avenue South o Renton, Washington 98055 9,0 co- 235-2501 (206) 0,9gT6*0 SEP1oF54 ' June 12, 1986 Enclosed is the material you requested. !! Your letter of June 3, 1986 i MAXINE E. MOTOR, CMC City Clerk • • • • I it • II 14 • I ' iI Everett Johnson Renton Village Co. OF 1?4, 15 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 �► OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK Z City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South o — Renton, Washington 98055 9.0 `)- 235-2501 (206) 09gT�D sEPI `s° June 12, 1986 Enclosed is the material you requested. MAXINE E. MOTOR, CMC City Clerk cithoaI, )/uitaem • • • • • • 001 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 3996 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM HEAVY INDUSTRIAL (H-1) AND GENERAL CLASSIFICATION DISTRICT (G-1) TO BUSINESS DISTRICT (B-1) (R-016-86 THE CALLISON PARTNERSHIP, LTD. ) WHEREAS under Chapter 7, Title IV (Building Regulations) of Ordinance No. 1628 known as the "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton" , as amended, and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the property hereinbelow has heretofore been zoned as Heavy Industrial District (H-1) and General Classification District (G-1) ; and WHEREAS a proper petition for change of zone classification of said property has been filed with the Building & Zoning Department on or about February 20 , 1986, which petition was duly referred to the Hearing Examiner for investigation, study and public hearing, and a public hearing having been held thereon on or about May 6 , 1986, and said matter having been duly considered by the Hearing Examiner and said zoning request being in conformity with the City' s Comprehensive Plan, as amended, and the City Council having duly considered all matters relevant thereto, and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto, NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I: The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby rezoned to Business District (B-1) as hereinbelow ti ORDINANCE NO. 3996 specified; subject to the findings, conclusions and decision of May 14, 1986 the Hearing Examiner dated May 7, 1986 and the/site plan approval conditions imposed by the Hearing Examiner in SA-032-86; the Building and Zoning Director is hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to evidence said rezoning, to-wit: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein. (Said property being located at the Southwest corner of South Grady Way and Talbot Road South) . SECTION II: This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval and five days after its publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 2nd day of June, 1986 . Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 2nd day of June, 1986 . ►30A6.)►w ,SL oelek Barbara T. Shinpbch, Mayor Approved as to form: AAkM1114M1.1.44P Lawrence J. W en, City Attorney Date of Publication: June 6 , 1986 I' . • ORDINANCE NO. 3996 EXHIBIT A That portion of Block 2, Walsworth.'s First Addition to Renton, as re- corded in Volume 6 of Plats, page' 23, records of King County, Washington, TOGETHER WITH. vacated Dora Street and vacated 8th Avenue adjoining, as vacated under Ordinances 1067 and 2850, respectively, of the City of Renton; and that portion of the Northeast quarter of the Northeast quarter and the Southeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 19, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington, lying South of the southerly margin of Grady Way (also known as Secondary State Highway No. I-L) , being 100 feet in width as presently established; lying North of the northerly margin of South Renton Village Place (also known as Service Road) , as conveyed to the City of Renton by deed recorded under King County recording number 5475310; and lying West of the westerly margin of Talbot Road (also known as Burnett Road Extension) , as conveyed to the State of Washington by deed recorded under King County Recording Number 5754046, and State Road No. 515, as condemned by decree entered in King County Superior Court Cause No. .' 761065; EXCEPT that portion thereof lying West of the following described line: Commencing at the Southeast corner of the Northwest quarter of said Northeast quarter; thence southerly along the West line of the Southeast quarter of the Northeast quarter a distance of 190 feet to the northerly margin of South Renton Village Place (also known as. Service Road) ; thence easterly along the northerly margin of said South Renton Village Place a distance of 402.42 feet to the True Point of Beginning of the line herein described; thence North 1°04 ' 08" East a distance of 839 .92 feet, more or less, to the southerly margin of Grady Way, and the terminus of said line. LESS THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCEL: That portion of the Northeast quarter of Section 19, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington, described as follows.: Beginning at the intersection of the North margin of Renton Village. Place and the West margin of Talbot Road South (State Route 515) ; thence northerly along said West margin of Talbot Road South 410' to the True Point of Beginning; thence due West 175 ' ; thence due North 200 ' ; thence due East 1971 + to the West margin of Talbot Road South; thence southerly along said West margin of Talbot Road South to the True Point of Beginning. /f/ % 1.2% 'qr.,. - ,:•0.,ez ours. _A), /r -.-- " •i 1:i /14 ii iii.:/"...41111 litik a ' -4517- .,- a.\% 4. % ' 00. ' ' )"mr1.1.:I-411 7.1..r::1111141/11 MIMI • r iti/RP a,147 tiiiiii//, 4 X ' I/11114,101,,lifiril ...:47w leb ( \ \ . %,:.: • . , i1 :.',. ..7„.,.: -.' t 4*441612t'''c IA I I/ /iiiitl:NZIL 1:9P.00 % % _..di, SI_ MC_ me. M 1 9 Pr •---,Pat aL. mon • , _imi (VI • t •,. 7- - •f '=Lir --- B. 'fl,, ' la. 3Er eLvo. ,, -0. r -ASCS4101.6, I •r.!...,. ;___.-.A .v.4; ..ri;6',vaitkie .%"" Ili 1,7111Z.1.1 liar ! qj C.411!!1' • f'::;_I- rrTZ • . -... heCTs 4,:•. enho , • ORDINANCE NO. 3996 . sii - R i'Zirrz.,' IF Plill. "04 44 i; afftWril .3;i 1:: Z it. . or • 04c ---4-..!.,., oh • . % dt- \ rr. is...JPIP/.., ..s:21 iti •`) - • • . • :` oh 4g•t4441 h. ..4 :PIO 41174, ‘ A:.:,"0 , .... % ‘ illii 'J.' ...."." , MIS SU me nwersc.j. For .isiii_: -• ..;• -• CP% '4141., ...,, •' 4 ahri-W.! •:J el :I o. . t- ' % ‘ 4,41111 . ''..li -. lallgt- hi: az , .4 WIT' r , ... ..,... r,11:;•,111 , %. . .."......-- ."1,1,:- • -.4reputur. _-_ . . -111417 4/4114 • 'rP„.-) 41Ir y h ..16e, it;r ".. ..,tam nor, 44 1 roL 1•w• -um 611C 4 .• 1 99 N. •46-21 mgr. i . .: Riu, . --- % - " . ---t9.1 Mimi • ' "CCililigi .. • -- ---- % 1, S. -Iv,sr .*__,_,4 •-tm A ...0==:: .. - -1-I a mff, rii maga" 9 t 1 w As t En im-• Ilili 1. NC moo nse NE • 4 14 9. • • silik. :36,1 4,,, ' % % .---'- ..---. '1, % SI rit i A I / t: , , , .... , • vi 1 , !.... , ; ,. • ti, t , % m i,g • . ,.. M pulz--, Al 14 ilm . 1 ,.................. ..; ,,i,. 1 . / 1.1 „:„ rW I / i-...............• % tlit II t,a. ,• .I 4, , '""-u1"--A. " . _Alilu MO-- I. ild' -1!..w. 11"115 ST. i VI -MIMI Lr•T7P.•• •.-•• 4 ' / 0. 1 /irti • .1 . , I... An s A I •) 1 1 ____4 .............• O. iLi 0 •in• / .6- . I Iri\i: . • .......61-.............. :I I q I .•-•''' _l''' .....[ 2 • I •' I • 1 ,-Tv'00 o z . 0!"--0 .- I. • o % Dtlal I` , ti° 4/' 41111 .4:71. --- Ilir . . I 1 ...., .....-• % 1 . d......,.,xt I . ..... 01 ' ., •• v•P' 0111111I!.. „_ .to"' l000lgl. ll I "- 011111 0 a .. • ... .../. 1011E•11.migl/ nT111131OM ..r,,F G .S1'4:1111111-RIP411111111 IIIIIIIIII 1 8/ Ti.. , _ ..... .REN01611U-AG4 c tizo 004-0...."41‘.•*• 5 • 1111 witillils 4A,1% /11 ..„.... ........ ,477..7.;._i t144-.,0015-- 1*I•1 I II !--1 I IiiiiifillITI [41111111 P 110" -- ‘ %.. C .. ' , Ili I I I =^1ifillill i. 1 11111-D- altiiiiitio _ . N N 1 N N . ( I ... ' ire 1111 I ;110 1 i"" 111011 4 jillilalli .1.) . • ( il Id, \ . . . _._. 1 0.. 1 iii."._______7_____________li iii iii __. gituilin 1 iii____ _____7_11 111140001.1 mil I . 1111 nielLii fir s 9111111 11110111.411111 ..,• 1 1...•00 ....010!„; ___,I.7-- 11.111 • • . --....-••••'- rim ilIl I.- : fffill -- 77,--:-----,. .,.-- -1.; .,, •,,t1:I I.. ....-% . , ,----- -011; -,lagk,;1111 ' .0 _ \ ......,__-:- 0, . . Am parg41111311 iik . A MI.., ,1,M ::. fr,:inbill Z 41 \ \ . E -.•-• L. , // 41011 , igg \ .......' . . ,iist no WV •EMI I illiV ' .r47:41•11 C1'. 1117:114:014. 61\ ....44'••• • '4% --.12--42 % • 1...,,---..,,U4.66 1 E..-'-----. 444446••••m• IM. ,., - .4 swim am ST 4, 14 4 EN . % ,....% \ • , ...„, - -N, Ars rat us•Nors 341 46 Lrbir---.--- • 41 ' :::: I ' I -- ... IR" so ••5‘ 1 , 7.-1---- • •1 11 llwrMIl _. ammo ' r'6 . • ..17.• =Awn. 'urvula vim .4., it. _ • E. ist 0 ;•% - __ 1.....e...ara ardius 16.1 iv . . . . Ed" • 0 • , 1 V • ' K MIrii WIWI lin'i ••is WM 1.-1211141.11 L ,. 147 Irani t Ir. , IA 1 ‘.9.. Irli‘719ER ; q..;s• .. . . 1:7 . , • . tk ilmmuni isilim. 1 ,.., , ir..... • 0 ! • In wawa MIR= " ....., • v . -1 \ ,•ut ST --...--S6 " I IV 6 ii • ' I----------------- =/1-----W. ilim44 _ ' a . SO - 11C11/.1111111111 w , -- a ____ IP 66 it 69 IN .., at •e . ____ - r, ft" ...., -, is 61 (2 66 AS ,...11 10 l'-'• I • --- immilimm -5 • . ' limn amme -,‘ • NIMMININ/M4 immit sous ' . I- CA at . IL. • is . 4,..._//........ 1 -- ---7-- Imiwil . 1 waffin1 rum a ta,., 7:31151 =AI i -- - . . 96 40 INIIK • ej t • - .'• • - • i --- , • , 0 4 CITY OF RENTON _ DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS • - ----- -I,, , 1,-... • ----.---..- ... .-.--. •, . • \ ' . • C A LL/SON RE ZONE R-016-86 :1 1 ' DATF-daVE/98 . FILE NOff & -a -ig . , DESIGNED DRAWN CHECKED SGALF 1141.0,SOOK--PAGI.--- I APPROVED SHEET.----OF----- 01.11CCIIIN Cif PIM IC VI01111• . I AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Audrey DeJoie , being first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the VALLEY NEWSPAPERS Daily News Journal, Daily Record Chronicle, Daily Globe News Daily newspapers published six(6)times a week.That said newspapers are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King County, Washington. Valley Newspapers have been approved as legal newspapers by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the Daily News Journal—, Daily Record Chronicle—, Daily Globe News , (and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice a Ordinance No. 3996 was published on June 6, 1986 R1626 The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $ 1 06,92 Subscribed and sworn to before me this 10th day of June 19 86 Notary Public for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, King County, Washington. VN#87 Revised 10/84 1, CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGI I __ ORDINANCE NC. : 6 PuJIic Notice 1067 and 2850,respectively,of the City of AN UHUIN ASH OF THE CITY NGOF Renton; and that portion of the Northeast TTHE .ZONING CI CLASSIFICATION CHANGING quarter of the Northeast quarter and the CERTAIN R THEOE Southeast quarter of the Northeasttquarter PROPERTIES WITHIN of Section 19,Township 23 North,Range 5 DUSTRCITY I RENTON FROM HEAVYCLAS-IN- East, W.M., in King County,Washington, SIFICATION (H I AND (G-1) TO GENERALBUST- lying South of the southerly margin of NESSDISTRICT DISTRICT ( BTHE Grady Way (also known as Secondary CALL N PARTNERSHIP,(R-016-86State Highway No. I-L), being 100 feet in CALLISON WHEREAS LTD.) width as presently established;lying North ngRegulations)under of Ordinance 7 Title I No. of the northerly margin of South Renton' 1628Blding C ra Village Place (also known as Service Ordinancesknown as the "Code ofe General Road), as conveyed to the City of Renton amended, and the City maps Renton", as by deed recorded under King County adop ed in the and reports rcording number 5475310; and lying adopted hereinbelow has therewith,the beenpro- West of the westerly margin of Talbot Road zone hereinbelow heretofore (also known as Burnett Road Extension), zo and n Heavy Industrialo is riot (G-1); as conveyed to the State of Washington by and General Classification District deed recorded under King County Record- WHEREASand in Number 5754046,and State Road No. a properionsaid propertyn for hashange 5 5, as condemned by decree entered in bf enne ed withathe of said & ing KingCounty Superior Court Cause No. been filed with the Building & Zoning 761065; Department on or about February 29, EXCEPT that portion thereof lying West of 1986, which petition was duly referred to the followingEPT describedo line: the Hearing Examiner for investigation, Commencing t he Southeast corner of study and public hearing, and a public the Northwest quarter of said Northeast hearing having been held thereon on or quarter; about May 6,1986,and said matter having q noon southerly along the West line of the Examinern duly zoningconsidered by the Hearing Southeast quarter of the Northeast quarter and said C request being in a distance of 190 feet to the northerly confo Plan, as men the City's Comprehensive margin of South Renton Village Place(also Plan, as amended, and the City Council known as Road); having duly considered all matters relevant easterly r Service Rothe northerly margin thereto, and all parties having been heard thenceof said South Renton Village Placer a appearingthereto,in support thereof or in opposi- distance of 402.42 feet to the True Point of lioTHECITY NOW COUNCIL OF THE CITY, Beginning of the line herein described; WASHINGTON,HT OF THE ORDAIN N thence North 1°04'08" East a distance of RENTON, DO 839.92 feet, more or less,to the southerly AS FOLLOWS: margin of Grady Way,and the terminus of SECTION I: The following described said line. property in the City of Renton is hereby rezoned to Business District (B-1) as LESS THE FOLLOWING EASEMENT: hereinbelow specified;subject to the find- EASEMENT ings, conclusions and decision of the For and in EASENT of ONE and Hearing Examiner dated May 7, 1986 and N Fo 00in DOLLARS consideration and other the May 1 imposed986 site plan Hearingapp Ex-val valuable consideration, the receipt of aminer io n A-032- by the and which is hereby acknowledged, RENTON Zoning in Stor is hereby the Building VILLAGE COMPANY,a Washington gen- directeddireine Director is themaps of thauthorized ing eral partnership("Grantor"herein),hereby Ordinance,to change age the vi the Zoning grants, conveys and warrants to PUGET - amended,to evidence said SOUND POWER & LIGHT COMPANY,a rezoning,S t bit Washington corporation ("Puget" herein), See Exhibit "A"e attached if fully hereto and for the purposes hereinafter set forth, a made a part hereof as if set forth perpetual exclusivep easement over,across herein. and under the following described real (Said property being ofSouth located awayt the ro ert (the "Property" herein) in King Southwest corner Grady Way property Washington: and Talbot Road South). e That portion of the Northeast quarter of effeSECTION II:itsT passage,is Ordinance ppllannd Section 19,Township 23 North,Range five daysd upon s approval5 East,W.M.,in King County,Washing- PASSEDfiv aftBYer tTs publication.C. ton, described as follows: BY THE CITY COUNCIL this Beginning at the intersection of the 2nd day of June, 1986.BYNorth margin of Renton Village Place M E. Motor,THE MAYOR this 22nd City Clerkand the West margin of Talbot Road APPROVED nSouth(State Route 515);thence north- lay of June, 1986. erlyalongsaid West margin of Talbot Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Road South 410' to the True Point of approved as to form: Beginning; thence due West 175'; awrence J. Warren, City Attorney thence due North 200';thence due East EXHIBIT A 197'plus or minus to the West margin of \hat portion of Block 2, Wrded inh's First Talbot Road South; thence southerly 3d of Plats,on to Renton,ge23, ecas rds of King Volume alongsaid West margin of Tablot Road i Nashington, TOGETHER records of County, South to the True Point of Beginning. Doraee WITH Avenvacatue Published in the Daily Record Chronicls Dora Street and vacated 8th Avenue June 6, 1986. R1626 tdjoining, as vacated under Ordinances DAVIS WRIGHT & JONES LAW OFFICES A PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS 2600 CENTURY SQUARE • 1501 FOURTH AVENUE ' SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 9810I-1688 (206)622 3150 22688-13 THOMAS A. GOELTZ June 3 , 1986 Clerk of Renton City Council Renton Municipal Bldg. 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Re : Rezone Ordinance : The Callison Partnership/ Renton Village Company/City File No. R-016-86 j Dear City Clerk: The City Council adopted a rezone ordinance at its meeting on June 2 , 1986 in the above matter. That was item 6F of the Consent Agenda, for which the Council suspended rules and advanced all readings. I would appreciate your forwarding to me a copy of the signed ordinance for our files. Thank you for your assistance. ° I Respectfully submitted, DAVIS WRIGHT & JONES Thomas A. Goe tz TAG:ff cc: Mr. James Warjone CITY,OF RE TON 'JUN 4 1986. piCCITY CLERK'S OFFICE ) TELEX:328919 DWJ SEA • TELECOPIER:(2(36)628-7040 Anchorage,Alaska • Bellevue,Washington • Richland,Washington • Washington,D.C. !!//2 00, For.Use By City Clerk's Office Only A. I . # AGENDA ITEM RENTON CITY COUNCIL MEETING i SUBMITTING Dept./Div./Bd./Comm. HEARING NG EXAMINER'S OFFICE For Agenda Of Juno 2, r,,04 (Meeting Date) Staff Contact Fred J. O',a.ofmwn (Name) Agenda Status: ' SUBJECT: Tl•IF CAl_LISO;a PARTNERSllip. LTD. - Consent Public Hearing 'soutnwes,t corner of South Grady W;Av and Talbot Correspondence ;.,nnd 1 1i t4-1 end Ordinance/Resolution "P1 to -i for buildinn o; III %entor Old Business Exhibits: (Legal Descr. , Maps, Etc.)Attach New Business Study Session A. Vnl lcw Vi In Other.. B. C. Approval : Legal Dept. Yes No N/A • COUNCIL ACTION RECOMMENDED: _ Finance Dept. Yes No. N/A REFER TO cAYS AND MEANS COI•?MIBTEE. Other Clearance FISCAL IMPACT: Expenditure Required $ Amount $ Appropriation- $ Budgeted Transfer Required SUMMARY (Background information, prior action and effect of implementation) (Attach additional pages if necessary.) eh rezone would permit office buildings on the site and also change the st.aLu of II Pi-.nm. Place from legally non-conforming legal and conforming, ner;iitr h r' renevatlon if necessary. The applicant wishes to construct 101 Renton Place en nor horn half of the site. Dearing Examiner reeom ena:s approval , no appals have f.)r_o filed. hearing Examiner also approved a site plan (SAp.)32..U1) contingent upon approv,ril Qi this rc.+yore by the City Counci l PARTIES OF RECORD/INTERESTED CITIZENS TO BE CONTACTED: Se vcAlow fi Se THIS COPY TO BE SUBMITTED ON TUESDAY AT DEPARTMENT HEAD MEETING. i, aTY OF RENTON • RENTON VILLAGE COMPANY [X JUN 2 1986 15 SOUTH GRADY WAY, RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 • (206) 228-3000 BUILDING/ZONING DEPT, CINEMA I, II & III ONE RENTON PLACE SHERATON-RENTON INN EVERGREEN OFFICE BUILDING RENTON VILLAGE SHOPPING CENTER June 2, 1986 Mr. Roger Blaylock `' , City of Renton . "' ��* ! -<' -, -" 200 Mill Street Renton, WA 98055 RE: Legal Description .fox Renton Village Rezone 1 Dear Mr. Blaylock, Enclosed for your review- and attached as Exhibit A is the registered legal description of, the property that Renton Village Company wishes to have rezoned to B-1, Also attached and labeled as: Exhibit B._ is, the registered legal description of that portion of the property that is- already rezoned B-1 and is in use as: a Puget Power substation, Therefore, Exhibit A is the legal description for the entire property except that portion described in the attached Exhibit B. Thank you fox your help in this matter and if you desire any additional information, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely Everett ohnson Construction _Manager Encls.. EJ/lm V • fc =la v?r o n�i o F -L/2-4 0 F�, ,ti ✓ ram— Co 1,0 •�-�- v -� . J 9 8 y • EXHIBIT A ' ' That portion of Block 2, Walsworth's First Addition-to Penton, as recorded in Volume 6 of Plats, page 23, records of King County, Washington, TOGETHER, WITH vacated Dora Street and vacated 8th Avenue adjoining, as vacated under Ordinances 1067 and 2850, respectively, of the City of Renton; and that portion of the Northeast quarter of the Northeast quarter and the Southeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 19, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington, lying South of the southerly margin of Grady Way (also known as Secondary State Highway No. I-L) beine 100 feet in widthlas presently established; lying_ North of the northerly mars-in of South Renton Village Place (also known as Service Road) , as conveyed tothe City of Renton by deed recorded .under King County recording number 5475310; and lying West of the westerly margin of Talbot Road (also known as Burnett Road Extension), as conveyed to the State of Washington by deed recorded under King County Recording Number 5754046, an'd Sete Road No. 515, as condemned by decree entered in King County Superior Court Cause No. 761065; EXCEPT that portion thereof lying West of the following described line: Commencing at the Southeast corner of the Northwest quarter of said Northeast quarter; thence southerly along the West line of the Southeast quarter of the Northeast quarter a distance of 1.90 feet to the northerly margin of South Renton Village Place (also known as Service Road); thence easterly along the northerly margin of said South Renton Viflaoe Place a distance of 402.42 feet to the True Point of Beginning of the line herein described; thence North 1 °04' 08" 'East a distance of 839.92 feet, more or less , Ito the southerly margin of Grady Way, and the terminus of said line. LESS THE FOLLOWING EASEMENT : EASEMENT For and in consideration of ONE and NO/100 DOLLARS l and other valuable consideration, the receipt of which is here- by acknowledged , RENTON VILLAGE COMPANY partnership ( "Grantor " herein) hereby , a Ws convey generald warrants to PUGET SOUND POWER � grants , conveys and OWER & LIGET COMPANY, a Washington corporation ("Puget" herein) , for the purposes hereinafter seat forth , a perpetual exclusive easement over , across and under the following described real property (the "Property" herein), in Ring County, Washington: That portion of the Northeast quarter of Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , Section un , Washington , described as follows: � � in County, Beginning at the intersection of they North margin of Renton Village Place and the West margin of Talbot Road South (State Route 515) ; thence northerly along' said West margin of Talbot Road South 410 ' to the. True Point of Beginning ; thence due West 175 ' ; thence duet North 200 ' ; thence due East 197 ' + to the West mar in of Talbot Road South ; thence southerly along said West margin of Talbot Road South to the True Point of Beginning . I � 'f - ;r i 1c OD - . Exhibit B �BIY ®p REP�TON --' Into 7- VO.?:. ti Y-I '—' Ili :.E.T. F 1. ;'.. JUN 2 1986 = _ - _ . _ _ BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. ' -- • EASEMENT For and in consideration of ONE and NO/100 DOLLARS and other valuable consideration, the receipt of which (s here- by acknowledged , RENTON VILLAGE COMPANY, is V) partnership ( "Grantor " herein) , herebygrants , a Washington, ve general � warrants to PUGET SOUND POWER 9r an is , conveys and t,. corporation ("Puget" OWER LIGET COMPANY, a Washington ( Puget herein) , for the purposes hereinafter set forth , a perpetual exclusive easemento the followingdescribed over , across and under a h Ring County, Washington: real property (the "Property" herein) n ty , That portion of the Northeast quarter of Township 23 North , Range 5 East, Section 19 , W.M. , in King County,described as follows : Beginning at the intersection of the North margin of Renton Village Place and the West margin of Talbot Sou West Sth (State Route R ; d out mar 515) ; thence northerly along gin of Talbot Road South 410 'of Beginning ; thence due West 175 ' ; � toe tee dueTeue North 200 ' ; thence due East thence of197 ' + to the West margin Talbot Road South ; thence southerly along t to the True Point of margin of Talbot Road Southsaid Weser Beginning .1 . Purpose . Puget shall h� con- struct , operate , maintain , repair , eve the right to�_ ; replace and enlarge an electrical distribution substation , • Property together withall under and upon the necessary or convenient appurte- nance5 thereto , which may include but are not limited to the following : Transformers , power circuit breakers and other e) ec- trical equipment. Concrete for, ' L : pads . . Ove - i _nes . _ _ aces , guys anc, di+c..�._ . - s , cross .:ndercround transmission or distribution lines includ- ing conduits, cables , vaults and manholes. • Overhead and/or underground communication and signal lines . • Access roads . ik;__,v 1_4,/If -ti/(-4-4-6 eirip [-!�A-1— �E5 t OTT b At © � ��"� �u 2 C 6J �� �?�� ��-- Pv� �� �-1 • .• '' ' ?- . / 9 8 7- F "A _ _ EXHIBIT A ' That portion of Block 2, Walsworth 's First Addition-to P.enton, as recorded in Volume 6 of Mats, pace 23, records of King County, Washington, TOGETHER k'I TH vacated Dora Street and vacated 8th Avenue adjoining, as vacated under Ordinances 1067 and 285D, respectively, of the City of Renton; and that portion of- the Northeast quarter of the Northeast quarter and the Southeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 19, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington, lying 'South- of the southerly margin of Grady Way (also known -as Secondary State Highway No. I-L) , beine 100 -feet in width as presently established; lying North of the northerly margin of South Renton n Village Place (also known as Service Road) , as conveyed to the City of Renton • r by deed recorded under King County recording number 5475310; an st P of the westerly margin of Talbot Road (also known as Burnett RoadlExte ying 'nsion) , . as conveyed to the State of Washington by deed .recorded under King County 0 Recording Number 5754046, and State Road No. 515, as condemned by decree entered Din King County Superior Court Cause No. 761065; 0 - - EXCEPT that portion thereof lying West of the following described line: Commencing at the Southeast corner of the Northwest quarter of said Northeast quarter; • . thence southerly along the West line of the Southeast quarter of the Northeast quarter a distance of 190 feet to the northerly margin of South Renton Villaoe Place (also known as' Service- Road);the . thence easterly along the northerly margin trf said South Renton Village Place a distance of 402.42 feet to the True Point-. of Beginning of the line herein described; - _ thence North 1 °04 '08" 'East a distance of 839.92 feet, more or less to the southerly margin of Grady Way, and the terminus of said line. � ' LESS THE FOLLOWING EASEMENT : 1, $s xiap. following Easement: —•- Sf FECO TITLE INs1n 1,N COMPM -_, :-� STATE OF•-- ,�, onveyarnc : _' _ ' !rII GS���flQ� %�� _--fax= -' - _ t:Ef'1. Oi :,i.�r�2: r (:•; �_ f•- _ = p CITY OF RENTON REVENUE— •- i ,,-- 03!'—,,_��i!'_,-•. _ •- • i-D~ . [1n. N [i :it� ..'- !._�.'i1�t �i.��'"lf.'.�I'31�1i.- i_- `-- i { ` .Ty.. .tt•+�nr� .1. -- R ECO 1'i....�r_� � -Sr.F TITLE INSURANCE{;litOMPANYr-•:— - = . o - II 57ATF - unveyance_- BUILDING;Z:,NI G DEPT. 1.-- -- Li.ri. Of ..,G13-.t'I;r-.7�.1..i. 0 -t. G-/•� • - -_-- 1::PEYENUEI7- ''— — ,•— -- "_I_ — - -- `_ - -- ATTACHMENT # 1 Renton City Council -2- 6/2/86 PUBLIC HEARING WITH THE REQUIRED DEDICATION AND WITH THE PROVISION THAT continued SITE PLAN REVIEW BE REQUIRED PRIOR TO ANY DEVELOPMENT. Mother' s Park Rezone CARRIED. Advance to Tom Goeltz, 1501 4th Avenue, Seattle, requested advancement Consent Agenda to Consent Agenda Item 5.f. , Callison Partnership Ltd. rezone. MOVED BY HUGHES, SECONDED BY KEOLKER, COUNCIL SUSPEND THE REGULAR ORDER OF BUSINESS AND ADVANCE TO CONSENT AGENDA. CARRIED. ' . •I Callison Partnership Hearing Examiner recommended approval. of Callison Partnership, Ltd. Rezone Ltd. rezone, File No. R-016-86, 15.44 acres located on the ' R-016-86 southwest corner of South Grady Way and Talbot Road South , from H-1 , Heavy Industry, and G-1 , General , to B-1 , Business, ; zone to construct a development known as III Renton Place. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. MOVED BY HUGHES, SECONDED BY KEOLKER, COUNCIL SUSPEND THE REGULAR ORDER OF BUSINESS AND ADVANCE TO WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Ways and Means ;Ways and Means Committee Chairman Hughes presented a report ; Committee recommending the following ordinance for first reading, ' advancement to second and final reading, and adoption: Callison Partnership 'An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of ; Ltd. Rezone property located at the southwest corner of South Grady R-016-86 Way and Talbot Road South from H-1 , Heavy Industry, zone, to B-1 , Business, zone for Callison Partnership, Ltd. , File No. R-016-86. MOVED BY HUGHES, SECONDED BY TRIMM COUNCIL ' SUSPEND THE RULES AND ADVANCE THIS ORDINANCE TO SECOND AND FINAL READING. CARRIED. Ordinance #3996 Following second and final reading of the aforementioned ;; Callison Partnership ordinance, it was MOVED BY HUGHES, SECONDED BY KEOLKER, Ltd. Rezone COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. Noting that the R-016-86 Hearing Examiner had issued a report approving the site plan for the proposal on 5/14/86, following rezone approval on 5/7/86, it was requested by Council that the ordinance incorporate site plan conditions by reference. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Advance to MOVED BY TRIMM, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL SUSPEND THE Correspondence REGULAR ORDER OF BUSINESS AND ADVANCE TO CORRESPONDENCE. CARRIED. - I; Bids for Limited Letter was read from Deputy Finance Director W. E. Bennett GO Bonds' recommending acceptance of the low bid submitted by Merrill ,� Lynch Capital Markets in the net interest rate of 7.6362% for the $9,220,000 Limited General Obligation Bonds as authorized by Ordinance No. 3995. Further, notification was received last week that the City has retained its A-1 bond rating from Moody' s Investors Service. The issue was also insured by MBIA, but FGIC decided not to offer the insurance. Since the low bidder used the insurance, the result was a net savings in interest costs over the life of the issue of $1.79,000. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE DEPUTY FINANCE DIRECTOR.* Recess MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL RECESS FOR FIVE MINUTES. CARRIED. Time: 8:42 p.m. ' 9 Council convened at 8:45 p.m. ; roll was called; all members were present except Mathews, previously excused. ,I Bids for Limited Responding to Councilwoman Keolker's inquiry regarding impact! GO Bonds to. the bond issue if Mother' s Park property is not sold for continued the anticipated amount, Mayor Shinpoch reported that because they are separate issues, the bond sale will not be affected at all by the sale of Mother' s Park. Since The Boeing Company submitted the onry bid this date for the park property and it was unacceptably low, the Administration 'I will discuss alternatives and report back to Council . id A • , • • For.Use .By City Clerk's Office Only • A. I . # AGENDA ITEM • RENTON CITY COUNCIL MEETING ____ • SUBMITTING • Dept./Div./Bd./Comm. HEARING EXAMINER'S OFFICE For Agenda Of June 2, 1986 (Meeting Date) Staff Contact Fred J. Kaufman (Name) • , Agenda Status: • SUBJECT: THE CALLISON PARTNERSHIP, LTD. - Consent Southwest corner of South Grady Way and TalbotPublic Hearing Correspondence Road So. - Rezone of 15..44 acres from H-1 'and. Ordinance/Resolution X G-1 to B-1 for building of III Renton Place. Old Business Exhibits: "(Legal Descr. ; Maps, Etc.)Attach• New Business Study Session A. Yellow File • Other B. • C. Approval : Legal Dept. Yes_ No_ -N/A_ COUNCIL ACTION RECOMMENDED: • Finance Dept. Yes No. N/A REFER TO WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. , Other Clearance • FISCAL IMPACT: Expenditure Required $ ' Amount $ Appropriation- • $ Budgeted Transfer Required SUMMARY (Background information, prior action and effect of implementation) • (Attach additional pages if necessary.) The rezone would permit office buildings op the. site and also change the status of II Renton Place from legally non-conformi.ig to legal and conforming , permitting ,, renovation if neces`.sary. The applicant wishes to construct III Renton Place on the northern half of the site. Hearing Examiner recommends approval , no appeals have been filed. Hearing Examiner- also approved a site plan (SA-032-86) contingent •upon approval of this rezone by theCity Council . . • PARTIES OF RECORD/INTERESTED CITIZENS TO BE CONTACTED: See yellow file. • SUBMIT THIS. COPY TO CITY CLERK BY NOON ON THURSDAY WITH DOCUMENTATION. WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT JUNE 2, 1986 APPOINTMENT The Ways and Means Committee recommends concurrence in the Mayor's appointment of Ms. Pat O'Dell , 15775 - 188th Place S.E. , Renton, to the Municipal Arts Commission to complete the term of Joan Yoshitomi (resigned). The term is effective to December 31 , 1986. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following ordinances and summary ordinance for second and final reading: Amending Regulations Regarding Taxicab Parking 1985 Uniform Fire Code Changes and Summary Ordinance The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following ordinance for first reading: Uniform Building Code The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following ordinance for first reading and further recommends suspension of the rules and advance it to second and final reading: Renton Village Rezone (R-016-86) from H-1 and G-1 to B-1 - The Callison Partnership, Ltd. - Southwest. corner of South Grady Way and Talbot Road South The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following resolutions for reading and adoption: . Authorizing an Interlocal Planning Agreement with King County S)• -/-1-4--) / Robe Hughes, airman at y Keo er 7-/-;)/ Thomas Trim o 4 OF R4,4, '$i:.. `; z THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL MUNICIPAL BUILDING • 200 MILL AVENUE SOUTH • RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 . 235-2586 C) o 0,91 7.e0 SEPle*30' MEMORANDUM • DATE: May 28, . 1986. TO: Mayor Shinpoch . City Council FROM: Nancy Mathews SUBJECT: Renton Village Rezone (R-016-86) from H-1 and G-1 to B-1 The attached is a request for Council action on June 2 to give first, second and final approval of this rezone ordinance. • The current zoning of this property is H-1 and G-1 and includes the site of their previous two office buildings; One Renton Place and ,Two Renton Place. When Council approved the changes in the H-1/M-P/O-P/ and L-1 ordinances in September 1985, we were aware some existing construction would become non-conforming because it would no longer allow cascading to lesser uses. However, I don't believe it was the intent of the Council to create mixed zoning in this area, especially with H-1 uses. The Hearing Examiner has determined the B-1 zoning appropriate and it is my understanding city staff would have no objection to facilitating the request of Renton Village Company and The Boeing Company. I hope you will favorably consider this request. • Nancy thews, Council President NM:bd Attachment DAVIS WRIGHT & JONES LAW OFFICES A PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS • z600 CENTURY SQUARE • 1501 FOURTH AVENUE • SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98101-1688 (206)622-3150 May 23 , 1986 RECEIVED MAY 2 71986 CITY OF RENTON CITY COUNCIL Councilmember Nancy Matthews, President of Renton City Council Renton Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 RE: Adoption of Rezone Ordinance for Rention Village Company; City File No. R-016-86 Dear Councilmember Matthews : The Renton Village Company requests the City Council advance to June 2 , 1986 all of its readings of the ordinance which would rezone property owned by the Renton Village Company to B-1 under City File No. R-016-86 . The site is located at the eastern end of our property located adjacent to S. Grady Way and Talbot Road. The hearing examiner issued his report and recommendation on May 7 , 1986 in favor of the rezone stating that "The City Council should approve the reclassification of the subject site from G-1 and H-1 to B-1. " The Examiner further noted that "The rezone will permit the establishment of high quality office buildings on the site,." which are known as Two Renton Place and Three Renton Place. A copy of the Examiner' s report is attached. The appeal period has expired with no appeal having been filed. We have discussed our request for advanced reading of the rezone ordinance with Larry Warren. We understand he has prepared the ordinance so that it will be fully available at your June 2, 1986 meeting. (It will be available sooner, but the Council does not meet during the week of May 26 due to Memorial Day) . We request the Council adopt the rezone ordinance at its June 2 , 1986 meeting because of the circumstances in which the Renton Village Company finds itself. Specifically, we have a commitment from Boeing , to occupy the nearly finished office building located on the sit (Two Renton Place) and the building proposed on the remainder of the site (Three Renton Place) . TELEx:328919 DWJ SEA • TELECOPIER: (206)6287040 Anchorage,Alaska • Bellevue,Washington • Richland,Washington • Washington,D.C. Councilmember Nancy Matthews May 23 , 1986 Page Two There are several reasons which support our request to advance the readings. First, the Renton Village Company believed the City had previously rezoned the site as part of an area-wide rezone to implement the Central Area portion of the Comprehensive Plan as had been done in the Valley Planning area. Because of our misunderstanding that the rezone had already been accomplished, we negotiated and committed to the Boeing Company for occupancy of the nearly completed Two Renton Place Building and the proposed Three Renton Place Building. In order to meet our commitment, we need to have the property rezoned as soon as possible. A second reason for our request is that the Comprehensive Plan, including the "Commercial" designation on the Comprehensive Plan map, called for the B-1 zoning proposed. Third, there is no opposition whatsoever to the B-1 rezone. Finally, the hearing examiner has unequivocally recommended adoption of the rezone. We appreciate your consideration and we are available to provide any information which the Council desires before or at the June 2 , 1986 meeting. Respectfully submitted, DAVIS WRIGHT & JONES ,ZrIse,s16 d, Thomas A. Goeltz , for Renton Village Co. Enclosure cc: Mr. James Warjone, Renton Village Co. Mr. Larry Warren, Renton City Attorney Mr. Richard King, The • Callison Partnership TAG:vpw • OF I a• : THE CITY OF RENTON 3.>>••- a;,;r}• MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 o ° BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR a LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 40- 9A0 FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 0,9gTcSEPT`-• R MAY 2 3 1986 May 22. 1986 T.A.G. Tom Goeltz -1501 - 4th Avenue 2600 Century Square Seattle, Washington, 98101-1688 RE: File No. R-016-86 The Callison Partnership Ltd. Dear Mr. Goeltz: The Examiner's Report and Recommendation regarding the referenced request has not been appealed within the time period established by ordinance. Therefore, this matter is being submitted to the City Clerk for transmittal to the City Council for review. You will receive notification of final approval, as well as a copy of the enacting ordinance, from the City Clerk upon adoption by the City Council. If further assistance or information is desired, please do not hesitate to contact this office. • Sincerely, FRED J. KAUFMAN HEARING EXAMINER FJK:dk • 1223E cc: City Clerk Building & Zoning Department 1215E s M 986 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER MAY 1 5 CITY OF RENTON 1986 REPORT AND DECISION. T.kG. APPLICANT: THE CALLISON PARTNERSHIP, LTD. • FILE NO. SA-032-86 LOCATION: Southwest corner of South Grady Way and Talbot Road South. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Approval to construct an office building known as III • Renton Place, consisting of 131,000 square feet, together with an associated parking lot of 660 parking stalls. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Building and Zoning Department Recommendation: Approval. Hearing Examiner Decision: Approved, subject to approval of Rezone R-016-86 by City Council,. BUILDING & ZONING The Building & Zoning Department Report was DEPARTMENT REPORT: received by the Examiner on April 29, 1986. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Building and Zoning Department Report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on May 6, 1986, at 9:40 A.M. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into. the record: Exhibit 01 - Yellow file containing application, proof of posting and publication and other documentation • pertinent to this request. Exhibit #2 - Revised Site Plan dated April 23, 1986. Exhibit #3 - Photograph of III Renton Place. Exhibit #4 - Letter dated April 23, 1986 establishing Transportation Management Plan. Exhibit #5 - Letter dated April 30, 1986 from Metro to Ron Nelson. Exhibit #6 - By reference, Rezone file for Callison Partnership, Ltd. R-016-86. A review of this proposal was presented by Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator. He referred to Exhibit #2 stating the property is 8.55 acres, designated as commercial, and is to be the future home of an office building to be called Three Renton Place. The 7 story building will be identical to the One and Two Renton Place buildings on adjacent sites. Access will be from Grady Way at the northwest corner of the site as well as the southeast corner of the site adjacent to the Puget Power Substation. The accesses are limited to right-in and right-out turns. As a mitigation for Two Renton Place a traffic signal was required at Talbot and Lake which will further accommodate the traffic to be generated from this proposal. Upon further review Mr. Blaylock advised the applicant will . • participate in storm water drainage improvements for the area: recreational facilities have been relocated adjacent to the Puget Power Substation site as shown on Exhibit #2: and a pedestrian corridor has been established between Two and Three Renton Place. Mr. Blaylock stated the applicant has reached a transportation agreement with Metro as referenced in Exhibit Nos. 4 and 5. The Calljson.Parftnership, =_3 t.5A'd3'2=86' ' May 14, 1986,,/; Pade 2 Initially 'the proposed parking lot was of concern as it was felt the pedestrian and vehicle movement was not properly separated; perimeter landscaping was reviewed along with the proposed access in the northwest corner of the site. It is felt the intent of the site plan ordinance has been met with the modifications to pedestrian circulation, on-site recreation, perimeter landscaping, circulation and access. It was pointed out the driveways within the subject site are in need of improvement. The only area of expressed concern was the proposed recreational area of 9000 sq. ft. which the City feels should be increased to 10,500 sq. ft., thereby eliminating 3 parking spaces on either end. Mr. Blaylock closed with a recommendation of approval with six conditions set out in the staff report. Calling for testimony in support of this application from the applicant or their representative, responding was: Tom Goeltz 1501 - 4th Avenue 2600 Century Square Seattle, Washington, 98101-1688 Mr. Goeltz clarified the exhibits as presented and requested that the Rezone file to cover this property also be made a part of the permanent record. This was accomplished by the entering of Exhibit #6. Mr. Goeltz continued stating the condition regarding the timing of the drainage requirement imposed by ERC does not mean the physical improvements must be in place prior to occupancy, but instead referred to the applicant entering into an agreement commiting them to fund their fair share of the improvements. A traffic analysis by CH2M Hill was referred to regarding traffic mitigation measures specifically shown on page 17. He said with the mitigating measures it is felt the traffic generated by this project will be adequately addressed, as well as the improvements to the area, enabling them to provide an increased level of service. Mr. Goeltz said the applicant will be requesting a Latecomers Agreement from the City Council for the extra lanes to be added on Talbot as well as some of the intersection improvements that are not adjacent to the site but seem to provide a system-wide benefit. He then introduced the architect for the project. Testifying was: Richard King, Architect 1423 - 3rd Avenue Seattle, Wa. 98101 Mr. King referred to traffic circulation and said it is his understanding there is also a channelized left-turn lane into the project on the northwest corner of the site, not just a right turn-in and out as had previously been stated by staff. They do not intend to revise the configuration of that street at this time as it is not a condition to do so by the City. He addressed, the area proposed for on-site recreation stating they have provided on-site, and within the other buildings of the associated project, amenities such as 30,000 sq. ft. park, shower facilities and approximately 4600 sq. ft. of food service area. Mr. King said in Two as well as Three Renton Place there will be a provision allowed for the tenant to provide more shower facilities within the building. The anticipated tenant of the new building is Boeing Computer Services. He feels with the 2300 sq. ft. of food service provided in One and Two Renton Place, along with 9,000 sq. ft. of on-site recreational areas including tables, benches, etc., this would seem to exceed the 10,500 sq. ft. the City requested. He requested that the applicant be permitted to determine, at the building permit process, whether or not the tenant desires to have recreational services. Mr. King stated additional parking has been provided as they anticipate a high need due to the type of occupants that will be using the building. He requested approval of this proposal, with the original 9000 sq. ft. requirement for on-site recreational services. In closing, Mr. King advised the signage to be used will be office-park type, no higher than approximately 10 ft. He had no further comments. The Examiner called for further testimony in support of or in opposition to this proposal. There was no one wishing to speak. Gary Norris, Traffic Engineer for the City of Renton, requested clarification of the two letters referred to in Exhibit Nos. 4 and 5 as pertains to traffic improvements. He stated the ERC reviewed and set forth recommendations and he has had no further information from the developer as to what he will be providing. Mr. Goeltz clarified stating on Page 17 of the CH2M Hill report were referenced mitigation measures that would tie in with the ERC requirements. Mr. Goeltz closed with a request for an expedient determination by the Hearing Examiner. There being no one else wishing to testify, the hearing was declared closed at 10:15 A.M. The Callison Partnership, Ltd SA-032-86 May 14, 1986 Page 3 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicant, The Callison Partnership, Ltd., has requested approval of a Site Plan for an approximately 131,000 sq ft office building on approximately 8.55 acres of property. 2. The application file containing the application, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation, the Building and Zoning Department Report, and other pertinent documents was entered in the record as Exhibit #1. 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43.21 C, 1971, as amended), a Declaration of Non-Significance has been issued for the subject proposal by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the responsible official. 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all City departments affected by the impact of this proposal. 5. There was no opposition to the subject proposal from any member of the public. 6. The subject site is located at the southwest corner of South Grady Way and Talbot Road South. 7. The site was annexed into the City by the adoption of Ordinance 1547 in June, 1956. An application to reclassify the site and adjoining southerly acreage to B-1 (Business/Commercial) is pending. The portion of the site zoned C-1 (General; Single Family Residential; Minimum lot size - 35,000 sq ft) automatically received that designation with the adoption of the original zoning for the City. The H-1 (Heavy Industry) district at one time had been zoned an equivalent to single family. It was zoned H-i by the adoption of Ordinance 1741 enacted in March, 1959. 8. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of commercial uses, but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the plan. 9. The site is irregular in shape although almost rectangular. The northeastern and northern property line is described by the intersection of Grady Way and Talbot Road S. In addition, a small square segment at the southeast corner of the site, along the Talbot Rd frontage, is utilized by a Puget Power Substation. 10. The zoning around the site is a mix of H-1 and G-1, the site's current zoning, north and west of the site. An L-1 (Light Industry) district is just northwest of the site. The Puget Power Substation is zoned B-1. 11. The site is at the extreme eastern end of the Renton Village (Ernst/Pay N Save) Shopping Center. Two Renton Place, a companion building, is under construction just south of the subject site and One Renton Place is located southwest of the site. 12. Immediately west of the site is the shopping center and a gas station. The Evergreen Building, a movie theater and the Sheraton Renton Inn are also located on this large block. I-405 is located south of the subject site. 13. The proposed B-1 zoning would permit an office building of the type proposed for the subject site. The applicant proposes construction of Three Renton Place on the subject site. It would be a complement to Two Renton Place, now under construction, and One Renton Place, a completed office building. The building will be 7 stories in height and will match the exterior treatment of Two Renton Place. Concrete bands will be intermixed with rows of windows of clear glass. 14. In response to the staff and ERC analysis the applicant provided modified plans. As now proposed, the project will contain the approximately 131,000 sq. ft. building, parking for 657 cars, bike racks, on-site recreation, perimeter and internal landscaping and connecting pedestrian links tying the subject development to the other 'Renton Place' developments. The Callison Partnership, Lt. SA-032-86 May 14, 1986 Page 4 15. More specifically, a perimeter of trees and lawn will parallel the street frontage along Grady and Talbot. The trees will be offset from the street to avoid view blockage, and particularly near the intersection they will be moved toward the interior of the site providing a location for signage. The tree/landscape theme will be continued along the southern edge of the site between the proposed project and its neighboring Two Renton Place. Similar treatment will be provided on the interior of the site. 16. The applicant will provide landscaped pedestrian corridors through and around the parking areas. This will permit access between the various buildings, from the buildings to the recreation areas, and to the street on walkways somewhat separated from vehicular traffic. 17. The applicant has provided an outdoor recreation area adjacent to the Puget Power Substation rather than one surrounded on all sides by parking stalls. The area will be approximately 9,000 sq ft. Indoor showers and food service will be left to the discretion of the tenants, although similar facilities have been provided for the adjoining development. 18. Driveways to Grady and Talbot will be limited to right in/right out only. Aisle alignment will be consistent with Two Renton Place to provide a link to S. Renton Village Place and its controlled access to Talbot Road. The existing access immediately west of the site, between the site and the gasoline service station, will be maintained in its current state. 19. The Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle has entered into an agreement with the applicant to ensure a cooperative information effort to alert and encourage public mass transit, active enlistment for ride sharing/car pools, bike racks, signed reserved parking for car/van pools, and pedestrian corridors to promote easy access to the Metro Park and Ride lot north of the subject site. 20. The applicant has agreed to participate in and make extensive drainage improvements. The applicant will participate to the extent of $50,000 to $60,000 to fund area wide drainage improvements to include new and expanded culverts under I-405. An agreement in principle has been worked out between the applicant and the Public Works Department. 21. Traffic mitigation measures include the right-in access indicated above as well as modifications to the Lake/Grady Way intersection - two lane configuration northbound, permitting left lane left only turns, and right lane left turns, through movement and right turns; the Grady/Shattuck intersection would receive a new controller, and the three lane configuration northbound with similar turning and through movements enhanced by an additional lane. The leg of the Grady/Talbot intersection north to S. 7th would receive an additional lane. Renton Village Place would be improved. The applicant reserved the right to request Latecomer Agreements for some of these improvements. 22. In designing the parking lots, staff has permitted the applicant to take advantage of the adopted but not yet effective modifications of the Parking and Loading Ordinance. These permit more compact stalls and base required parking on lowered floor area ratios. The parking meets the intent of these provisions. CONCLUSIONS 1. The proposed project appears to serve the public use and interest. The applicant has made extensive modifications to satisfy both staff and the ERC in areas of traffic, landscaping and site amenities. 2. The site will be extensively landscaped both along the site's perimeter public road frontages and lot line, but also interior to the site and, throughout the parking areas. Pedestrian links will be discreet from the parking areas and will also be landscaped. 3. The applicant will provide improved access to the site by improving access to the entire block at Intersections west of the site, Grady/Lake and Grady/Shattuck, east of the site, Grady/Talbot, and south of the site, Talbot/Renton Village Place. Driveways will be limited to right- in/right-out to avoid turning conflicts on the major arterials adjacent to the site. • The Callison Partnership, Ltd SA-032-86 • •May 14, 1986 Page 5 4. The design of the site has been tied to the complementary One and Two Renton Place projects to provide an office park-type atmosphere when the site's B-1 zoning did not require such amenities. 5. The project appears well designed, and it appears that traffic conditions will not deteriorate substantially with the combined traffic improvements and the cooperative efforts of the applicant and Metro. 6. The proposal appears to be one of the better designed projects, and since it is located at a major focal point it will be seen by many persons passing through the City. . 7. The recreational space provided appears sufficient and will be sufficient if coupled with additional indoor amenities such as the food service area and showers for , active recreationalists. 8. Therefore, subject to approval of the pending Rezone, the Site Plan is approved. DECISION The Site Plan is approved subject to approval of the rezone of the subject site by the City Council. The Metro agreement shall be an explicit condition of approval. The ERC conditions are incorporated by reference. ORDERED THIS 14th day of May. 1986. rye\ FRED J. KA MAN HEARING E AMINER • TRANSMITTED THIS 14th day of May, 1986 to the parties of record: Tom Goeltz 1501 - 4th Avenue 2600 Century Square Seattle, Washington, 98101-1688 Richard King, Architect 1423 3rd Avenue Seattle, Washington, 98101 TRANSMITTED THIS 14th day of May, 1986 to the following: Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Richard Houghton, Public Works Director Larry M. Springer. Policy Development Director Members, Renton Planning Commission Ronald Nelson, Building & Zoning Director Glen Gordon, Fire Marshal Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Renton Record-Chronicle Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before May 28, 1986. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, • or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of $75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. • II • fir- III ;�� '1= .li 7_, .1 7‘•4.7. E... 1... .1 , 1 : --., .. f , 1 • t.....L •.. ,,, . :' . . • ,. t .77 -1-7— 1 I * ,‘,4 -,1 4. ' ' • e l 1 i. — — e I I O 1 ,�: r 1 j Jf : r f! I./ �� r �<. 1 1 ..j 1.J 5 rfe Ir..C'M i, • .��V .. J- — 1. I I • , ;r.t y r 1� • 1 '�••YIT1711i1IIT 1 1 I I - Q ' ' II I ' 1 1 ,:� ' '° e > . 11j11�'u' I, ;,;:. t >r ' ti e-� ; I 1 '::' t im! I 1 .... . • :.! .,, .. ' , , ,. i�• 11' I I 'J ' .a /1 1 `: ! may' " ; • I . . - �q . , . . IIIL. 1 I ✓�I . , . , I: , - _ 1 , _�• Ti ��f , II VTL RC•p�� .--J j• - "-" 'raw — —1 f— ,• ^nl�1 I; q ..-i--.t .Z I I , ... 7.N .e 4 . g- — •\\ ( 1 /,' ! . , RIZ.i, 1- I R-4 • : ;.:4i )i III :' 'a �� ��1 �" "" ' y • ' —.. • a., ti —. 1-7—r —r'Lr `.- � •, � I I. —.r u. .- I of d-1 ! 1 I — -'r f •. .. . •_ao ., ,o -0,s•r;q°�,! R-4 G— y' R I • . ; W�.. _ -- R-'0 J '_ .77 • . • ®^ 3(Z---_r+r 'I.1': =,nL�_:�f I I .. . CI-1^I ... r " - r\ . _ — 'r ?';� 1 . ' -_ .•. . ',-- - - 1 t ,. .. Rp I Y 1 j ' ,U ../...--„...._- .._-- i q .,. -� .. . ." L,. ' ''� . / I t a - —'c �fr I ., _ ' \C- . i 71: -"t"..--.11 j i. , — -7, ..1.......__ 1___•:-.-_.;,' (:...;`,..,:-...„,.--..<4,.c, _\-.(. ..‘ ,r . ___ .1.-A i..._ .j \\. .,....; .• _iri.n F.f.-_ - 4' • . )•/;-: • :I k • • THE CALLISON PARTNERSHIP, LTD. . i SA-032-86 i . APPLICANT THE CALLISON PARTNERSHIP, LTD. TOTAL AREA ±8-5ci ACRFS PRINCIPAL ACCESS SOUTH GRADY WAY EXISTING ZONING G-1, GENERAL USE AND H-1 , HEAVY INDUSTRIAL ' i EXISTING US E UNDEVELOPED ' PROPOSED USE , OFFICE BUILDING WITH 131 ,000 SQUARE FEET AND PARKING LOT OF 66,0 stz COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN COMMEkCIAL . COMMENTS I • 1 • I • I I- I ri „., - koz,0600z„ - ... . . . ..,.,„ :, .....,. ,.. I 111 • 0 • 0 • m,..... .:c.1, : :. ripiolil.. .41.4::ii. .C:, 4:14:, • ' .:. 1.1 ...• - o • 416 k/IN . - a ,. • mai 1 o'gg ,c,tOg`o' \ ,-, aim 0 0 •• • :,11 4' a fidgirbraill6...... r_ _ ._ ....; k a 000000 • ill I ii . o000o,o,,ogog. .t.k• ,s.',-,:.. ;.. .itoitir 1 ilk- . ifir r( , 0.00.0.„0,n.„0. .• •?, fig ..-, *, ....j PO, R 11 q p'0060;00,, ii: Ill lir. " -lighl 1 - 'Zoo 4,-, . -71 . 4, c, . . .:,<,....c...,, ‘,,,,,1,• . .., 1 ..gq,.,googgm9mc•c, ' 0.1,,,, ma km Attic .:-.t O'Agro°0"`• 1 ° ° °- ° °‘:.90 90 0 c, ill l'n .....u.g ' MS NMI . . , +0111111 •- sows T.. •...•,:":441011 .....40: UN. 11,!,_•.. N.. , ....4,, !:::,77'77'.'1., ,. ..:• ' . up „„ , • s"..„,c,‘NrIk, ni..0.occAcigc,' I„ trilnig. Atrir.;,671\( i . . ...I,,.. . ,,,,, ..,, .......-----________ , e ,?.,,, t . • .•. ---------. .. • „444.144... ". ',.:. it: 0,4,5,. ., ,,,...„„,...„„ cc,:.4„,„, •••: .•;,„ 0 0 •• : :.: . ,. •at...pialapapwal:. .4../....Air ''••- • .'"•11?‘ It -.1•141S, )0 t) ..' .' ••...:••• :....::.....-.....'... ‘..\:"..‘"•(4!fi..4.6 s'.0\.1.. '411\' & 11111INIF is:iligurati OA algiormari,..c.-/,- . , ... :• ,. .::..,:..... . ..•.::..,,..:.:i.-.)• ;•,..,,,,:A. •,•.;,. Lj Mph `VI ' illernatro-°-%-r . ---•••• s - ylripirsoit'ititirlifirri-Welfei • '........, ....\,• . ,, , .., 4 .,..:,.. :..-. : ,..:,:._;:.:,,....-..;1,-.4'•,4,','.1'..T....•A , - . ' ' .. 'i ''', Z1''•it'.:'. , :r,, :..:,, ,• lb 1. Ili , lo': • Ill II III .103=' ST r ,...c.:1"..1.•.r.,. ':.....::':::::::. . s''1';:,:‘••••' ' -:--4-'.-4--;-4 • •4„.. ... 1 r a r. • , . .„ t•It . ', .04/1 1 1 1 — 11,.-mi% •r •wse ‘• ...1'.. :...:.' .-11'. ------7--------•-------.• •' .:•':••''.* •*.--—,--iiiitigi*L. a MU IAA 1 01)- - plait • 1 ,\ , .,:,....::::. ... _, .__ . __ . .____________ .....•••••••:::::::.,.i.::::: : ::::: .:.::...::..1.-.1 1.4:11.10.1 .. „do tiLia.". ' ' ' :... • .(;:s.:t r.s.• r: .... \ 1;::?-:]::•, - . ,..,..32.... - ...,7:::•_--", -_-_-_- -__ _..„. . ,. .,••:•-.m.::::.:-K:;:l NIlei • • \ ••••• 1 , \llif . i . . . • • , W ' • • ----\\\.,' .• .V),:;.P.',: •'%.,.,,x 4,',i'.'7 ' ---41.P1W:::"------- e igim.....11:6 1 i piTar ( : i , .... 1 1 \ r.. ....,,,.,...3.4..... I •_. ,,• ,-,Ir._.:-__:_-_-__f*Iiv 0161 --.:.- --_.•:3....f._t iq...__ ...:.-...,_-_:_:_•-; 2.._.-.._.iff 4: ianiel rTliipmlmi,1 41....7,...,.::•,Awfiglirifiaaii iw% i I / , e ,''.• --IV-A/6: ). 0 0.' '-:s ------------------ —7.— — *---- "_--__—•-•1 p I jig 1:1.(,,, ,, dux',P. ,I 1 . ; ::::„.,... ,,, • ,..,..e. - ______, .0.1,00.0.0.; - -..-_-.-_---_-------- --- -...}._--• -_--_-_ .1: i.Af.i.:: •.„11 rrii01,4, v. '.1.e.i.e• '------------ :o°o°r°093°0°01` ,.—..—_—_—_---_---•-:'---••- --7-—,-17-7 L—_.. .. • - ,. g e:CX k ---------- 'oc'ouoVuOcaro%- -‘'L-••-•-•-•••-----:.1 -7- .WO/MO- of s.,1 ,i s,g,,:g„... . -__-__-_:_-_-__:20.yonoocpoo.93000,,...j.... __-__-,_-_-__:__,.. .. .....1.,, ,_._, PI pler V" /' cli /'-.. .7-•,!.tf• 1 I :re.,• 1,7- -_-_- y con00000000•.t:: • ------,--------------- •J iii:i ...• • ..-L -1. • • • . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .4••• -44-4:•--- '-.. •- a*.C.'-....•:. 1 •'^•-• lag": ir”r1"4 II:WM*41° s • . •. . ' • 000000000000000 - ---7_ .. • 7• - los \.\ Ea ill ,, ,.• 40118) .;lalotr• -gi. ,. . ,0„,,,c,..c,,,c,...0.•: , -_.„„. ,,,„ . .„• _ 0, . <•• aria,'lb,. ' 7 . ..0..0.000....„ . .. _, .. . •. 7, . • 4 00000000000 • . ,e 0000000 4 • g. • -- ••••---•-, ., ' • •.°O°0°13°4°4' • • • • '.- i It'C .....- - allini:rri _.ir....47...:...;•••lii Alike . 1 0 or p. :- ...''.:.:...,....., .. ,' X 060 000•i••••••,•C4 ii..:-_ra...-0.. -- -:••••• - ,,,-,r,A....,..7111dii...,..,*_ii.---- 41 '• . • ,-.;•: ,• •', :.. • lops . , ..• [ '''' • '...A,'''' ' '-ak--sem-s, • •,. •,..., ''' . _ . ... ,-.-_,......... Iiiir•IPE, 1 11111 .. , ---...----- 1".*•-• . -;•,...--........\\_-_-_--_--we rfigiliNik,— ' ,x. .-‹ c..... ,•5'''' "ilea Illi,• ,,,-*°' .aVIIMII11.4 -- -- - .., . - Joy ij Itok4,10....,. • . .. :upa.,,:,,,,,,., In: .1 8 4 -_-_----.,-____ __-_-_-_-_- ,-, • ...... .,•.. ..--...v.:'‘ du- 'I ' • c-------- - -- -- - . - -- - -' - ' ' 4.." 11 i r 0,,,..,c,, , ion, A-diming' .-_-_-_:-•-_--_-------- ----------- ':' °I'm.' " ''''''' .... 11 Ak‘. .,,,,i-,./ij )•.•.•. I,1 ' iiiinwaillaiiimiC::L. .-.1:-_-_ 2,1_114.9-__ -;.--._--:_-_-_-_-_-:: :'::••::.; 1 i miff ,..• ' ' .• , .-- v . ._ III 0. 00 •--.L.i.-' ..,,.., ,,,,,,,. .,i....•. , i...: :Ea OMR r: - .• jerk s 00 • -••---"- ''' ;Mai • • ' "i'll' vesafassaa'., ----- -_ .7.-..---•°°° --- '• c.: i. oco o o 'la 'MO \---- o OMB:•...• flue am imose ., - - -----.9,ca;------- ' ,•• sum , , u I ,' lit s woonsomos, ----•-- -------- 00.0000..------ . ... )000 .;•./: insists 1 IllpiL•- ..','• tisss::::: , .:::::;;'_---_-• ----- -- ------------------- ';--..'.'''.; • lii .8 I .'. 1 Isision . um;.,: _-_ - ------- -_--_--_--_-_-_-- ,,::-.,fi 1 1 411116, 711—_-:1 . . • 1 ..., ,. •.'gat,; r..6 ,.• - ---- --- - - 1 . -- ' 1 • 1•118,c•• II Inn r, SIMI L..''... ,.. ••0. ../‘ INDIUMUMIgt -•/..: 0000 CA • 1 41' ' r.. :1111/ungg• ; I Sill .P.:_.:, 00004 \ I id Id !F..:„.....,:.:I fiiiiiiii i X: •it,911.7..1...•''.....--iTi :.----112....:E-.]E _/-....1:i=1.-:11-17-1-T17-_: 1.1.•••'t.'4;,'.11 4°00°00°4 r 0• :,?4C I ...: -. (me „is , •• e ,. . - , • _00000000.. irile• 1 •;;4:.. p ii q tow, _-wo- --_--_-_--: :114PZMO.: _---_\:;,`' . . .- ... 1.1 - -_-_-_ _--- -- - - - ,_-_,.:;, ..,3 3 3 3 lk • 1 t.,':13 4 1 St• I ''• 1 i • : 1 6::. HPir • 4r.:-...:•.H 1-..:27....7-. %H.'•:-:'-:•••:- CL r..:. IP l, I I ittli ";•IMMO IM11111111 if m.. • ,-- , •; 1 * .''Iiimilldadib IMP ..‘"'"!•-•7....--- • --- -- --------_K ---- ' . • 4, .Ill ....IMMO woomos Noe ••..'-.• .)•,r -- --- -- 1.'e• I •,, %. . 1 Ir"t. Nu•0-','':-3.....•. . .------ ---- -- -- .._ _-_- ;-,• •••.. r,f..• • r-i--z----1 ..: , •..:P,:•,)..c.';',:,,,,,,`..,:''':.':,:,SI.:::::::.,- ,. .-_ __-_ _ __-_-_-_-_, 0 4 7-'4;7,' _12..L.L.-'Z-2 L'. ::..,r..,_.,c.,.:.. .. .___________-_____:): _-__-__:1.c . .._. -; ! ! e • , coo , ...",... _ ___ _ _. .L g. ;. :2-- -- --- -La 2------'..":.!• 0 0 , 0 o I :• :: 0 • r-.. •-• __ _ ______ _ ,.<.• —1 - • . _ . . ___________ ...__ ,...• ) AP- 0 -_- —- - - cr . . L _. IL ,\1 . ._-_- , 7. -•:-/Tr_Ctid.S.P-V _--:.---- • -:-=1WP-74.4----- --- -:--- ----- .• 1,,S:11. 1,1%, . I ...0.0='. __ __ ___ _ / -- --— ............., __ , : ?go •0000000•L, • „oxim,,,,,,,.). . :Av..=,.....„ r , ---7,- Nir ( I 00000000 ,, sir. 4. • 0- ti' 4 e•Z 1 4; .. 1 ' o fie'--. --:- _________ .,c.,- -__-„, .. ......,}3__;_ 1 ________________:. :::::Fil i .0..00.0.000,,• , ._1, i •-IR _,:.,, • . . . ••;,t•,:,0.0.0 • 0 C.,.,.-p-•,0000 0 00.• ..:...i... .4"I'.. ••'••.••-• 4•. 1.• 4_ \III ) . 1_ 0 0 . ...ta 4,. 0.0_0_0_0 0000... 0 4 ::'•::•.i.::,:: •• .....1 44 I :i::..; %.'4;. • ' .. '''' :'.. ./••'.:%.•'•'I'.A LAI.,ID USE ELEMENT .,.:, r- • - --• . I • 1 Single Family 1 • 1 I •Commercial . I. ,......: ,„ • • . ..•. ...:.1 • ::..,::.,:.•••:.:.:.:.::.?. Low Mul Deti-Fnsityamily Office / Office Park, . • •• . • . lei., ., .. . •oo o uo oo. . . . .. •,:;:::',. •••••.:,.. Mediurn Density .0 V ••:•:::.:::•:::.:::•::::i:.. Multi-Famny •000,-,c, ,....0000.00 iP Public/Quas - ublic oc,c, I ... ... ... _ --- 1`,.{k.:e••. Nigh Density H'ic,•,,H .: Light Industrial roopo....,-1..... .. 1 .00.00.000,;.0,7„ 0.0.000000.0.0„1 - 0.„0...0._.. ., • .. 00.0c,ogogogoop ` 01Noc,000cogocol c '0g0 0.%22-9.-2%• "z - d 4- I 0 'II * k2.149o..22qii,..r.y , Z •-- fa •Z __ i ... • . -i• Recreation .. 0 ° °000 Heavy industrial t .3 . • 0 0 a_..qa.• •— • qc e, . . .I _ • -___ _, . _ __ A.'4'.;.''e.: Greenbelt __ -- ---- ___ _ Manufacturing Park ,4z -,,...•••• ...1 I — • • - / Multiple Option ! . OF I . ,...�- 1-0n O THE CITY OF RENTON h :f MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 isIL n moo � 'f rn BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 9'O co FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 o9gTco SEl'rV ° Q, May 22. 1986 Tom Goeltz 1501 - 4th Avenue 2600 Century Square Seattle. Washington, 98101-1688 • RE: File No. R-016-86 The Callison Partnership Ltd. Dear Mr. Goeltz: The Examiner's Report and Recommendation regarding the referenced request has not been appealed within the time period established by ordinance. Therefore. this matter is being submitted to the City Clerk for transmittal to the City Council for review. You will receive notification of final approval. as well as a copy of the enacting ordinance. from the City Clerk upon adoption by the City Council. If further assistance or information is desired, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Sincerely. FRED J. KAUFMAN HEARING EXAMINER FJK:dk 1223E cc: %/City Clerk Building & Zoning Department ' y -4 „ F flF 4R.4, OFFICE OF. THE CITY ATTORNEY • RENTON, WASHINGTON V `$ {�+ z POST OFFICE BOX 626 100 S 2nd STREET • RENTON, WASHINGTON 98057 255-8678 Z `' o np LAWRENCE J. WARREN, CITY ATTORNEY DANIEL KELLOGG, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY 4 - `O _ DAVID M. DEAN, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY _ o9�TEo SEP�E �� MARK E. BARBER, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY May 9, 1986 ZANETTA L. FONTES, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY MARTHA A. FRENCH,ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY TO: Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk FROM: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RE: Rezone Ordinance - The Callison Partnership, Ltd. R-016-86 Dear Maxine: Enclosed please find the original of a proposed Ordinance as above captioned. I am sending this ordinance before the Hearing Examiner' s appeal period has expired because of the need for prompt handling of this .rezone. The owners of this property met with the City and presented a very convincing case that we should do everything possible to expedite the rezone . The need for the rezone was created by the change of the City' s H-1 Zoning ordinance under which the applicant built several buildings in the same general vicinity. I was also requested by the Council President to do what I could to see that this_ matter was promptly handled. The Hearing Examiner's appeal date expires on May 21. The first available date for presentation to the Council would be June 2, 1986 . It is my hope that the Public Works Department will have the opportunity to check the legal descriptions by then and that the Council will consider this Ordinance on first and second readings on the 2nd of June. There was no opposition to this rezone and this is a continuation of the building projects wherein One Renton Place and Two Renton ,'' Place have been approved and built. This rezone is for Three Renton Place. If you have any questions, please let me know. e' La rence J. W rren ti LJW:nd Encl. cc: Ways and Means 'Committee Mayor Council President Bldg. &Zoning Dept. Public Works Dept. AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON ). )ss. County, of King ) DOTTY KLINGMAN , being first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and states: That on. the 7th day of May , 1986 , affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this 7 jy day of A14 r , 1986.. cae_.404,./0 ree_eceil. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at " Fhl7`a ,�,.) , therein. Application, Petition, or Case it: The Callison Partnership, LTD. R-016-86 (The minutes contain a list of the parties of record.) 4 l C � • 1208E May 7. 1986 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. APPLICANT: The CALLISON PARTNERSHIP. LTD. FILE NO. R-016-86 LOCATION: Southwest corner of South Grady Way and Talbot Road south. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Approval to rezone 15.44 acres of property from H-1 and G-1 to B-1. for future development of III Renton Place and to enable zoning compliance for II Renton Place. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Building and Zoning Department Recommendation: Approval _ Hearing Examiner Recommendation: Recommend approval by City Council. BUILDING & ZONING The Building & Zoning Department Report was DEPARTMENT REPORT: received by the Examiner on April 22. 1986. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Building and Zoning Department Report. examining available information on file with the application and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on May 6. 1986, at 9:35 A.M. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit #1 - Yellow file containing application. proof of posting and publication and other documents pertinent to this request. Exhibit #2 - Assessors Map. Exhibit #3 - Illustrative Site Plan. Exhibit #4 - Written testimony of Tom Goeltz, representing applicant. Exhibit #5 - Aerial photo of Renton Village and surrounding area. Exhibit #6 - Verbatim tapes of hearing of April 29, 1986. The subject site is located on the southwest corner of Grady Way and Talbot Road South. Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator. opened the hearing with a review of the proposal stating the rezone is for 15.44 acres to be changed from its current zoning of G-1 and H-1 to B-1 due to a change in the language for the Heavy Industrial zoning code. The change would bring both an office building currently under construction and another proposed office building for the site into compliance with the zoning code. He reviewed the surrounding uses in the area: traffic generation projections noting the area is going through a significant transition with the redevelopment of the power substation site that originally covered a majority of the subject property; utilities are available to the area; storm water drainage needs to be increased in the area; and the buildings are each 7 stories in height containing 131,000 sq. ft.. Mr. Blaylock continued stating an office park type atmosphere is planned; the ERC requested that additional environmental mitigation be placed on the site plan approval of proposed Three Renton Place with regard to storm water drainage. recreation, and traffic circulation. The Callison Partnership, R-016-86 May 7, 1986 Page 2 In reviewing the criteria to be considered for a rezone request, he advised the proposal appears to be consistent with the commercial areas on the Comprehensive Plan; traffic , access in the area is from two main arterials; reviewed major development in the area; and feels the request is timely due to development in the surrounding area. It was requested that the Hearing Examiner recommend approval of this application by the City Council. Calling for testimony in support of this application from the applicant or their representative, responding was: Tom Goeltz 1501 - 4th Avenue 2600 Century Square Seattle, Wa. 98101-1688 Attorney Goeltz stated he felt the applicant's request was given a complete review by staff; doesn't believe the current zoning on the property is appropriate for the surrounding uses or the Comprehensive Plan designation. This request will correct that problem. ' There will be joint recreation, parking, consistent landscaping and he feels the rezone for both sites is appropriate. Attorney Goeltz,referred to the Comprehensive Plan and its goals and policies and noted the City has already rezoned the site now occupied by Puget Power for the substation to B-1. He referred to the aerial photo and noted they will be presenting a Site Plan request to be tied to this rezone request. Mr. Goeltz said the applicant mistakenly thought the property had been involved in an area-wide rezone by the City Council and found this was not true, thus prompting this request. He requested a timely decision to expedite the possibility of the rezone request being presented to the City Council for their consideration, should approval be recommended by the Hearing Examiner. It was also mentioned that the drainage concerns expressed by the ERC and staff would be discussed during the Site Plan review process. The Examiner called for further testimony in support of the application. There was no one wishing to testify. No one spoke in opposition to this request, and there were no further comments presented by staff. The hearing was closed at 10:20 A.M. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS 1. The applicant, The Callison Partnership, Ltd., has requested approval of a rezone on appoximately 15.44 acres of property from H-1 and G-1 to B-1 . 2. The application file containing the application, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation, the Building and Zoning Department Report, and other pertinent documents was entered in the record as Exhibit #1. 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43.21C. 1971, as amended), a Declaration of Non-Significance has been issued for the subject proposal by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the responsible official. 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all City departments affected by the impact of this proposal. 5. There was no opposition to the subject proposal from any member of the public. 6. The subject site is located at the southwest corner of South Grady Way and Talbot Road South. 7. The site was annexed into the City by the adoption of Ordinance 1547 in June, 1956. The portion of the site zoned G-1 (General; Single Family Residential; Minimum lot size - 35,000 sq ft) automatically received that designation with the adoption of the original zoning for the City. The H-1 district was initially, equivalent to single family and was zoned H-1 by the adoption of Ordinance 1741' enacted in March, 1959. 8. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan, designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of commercial uses, but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the plan. The Callison Partnership, �.:.. R-016-86 May 7. 1986 Page 3 9. The site is irregular in shape although almost rectangular. The northeastern and northern property line is determined by the intersection of Grady Way and Talbot Road S. In addition, a segment along the central portion of the Talbot Rd frontage utilized by the Puget Power Substation intrudes into the site. 10. The zoning around the site is a mix of H-1 and G-1, the site's current zoning, north and west of the site, as well as L-1 (Light Industry) just northwest of the site. The Puget Power Substation located midblock with the subject site is zoned B-1, the category requested for the site by the applicant. 11. The site is at the extreme eastern end of the Renton Village (Ernst/Pay N Save) Shopping Center. Currently under construction on the site is the Two Renton Place building. 12. Immediately west of the site is a shopping center and gas station. The Evergreen building, the movie theater and the Sheraton Renton Inn are also located on this large block. I-405 is located south of the subject site. 13. A separate office building is proposed for the corner of Grady and Benson Road S. 14. SR-515 has been constructed within the last 2 years providing a major north-south corridor and also increasing the traffic at the corner of Grady and Talbot, making the intersection one of the busiest in the City. 15. The proposed B-1 zoning would permit office buildings on the subject site outright, whereas the H-1 zoning does not permit such uses. The zoning would also change the status of Two Renton Place from legally non-conforming to legal and conforming, allowing renovation if necessary. 16. The applicant proposes construction of Three Renton Place on the northern half of the subject site. It would be a complement to Two Renton Place, now under construction, and One Renton Place, a completed office building. CONCLUSIONS 1. The proponent of a rezone must demonstrate that the request is in the public interest, it will not impair the public health, safety and welfare and in addition. complies with at least one of the three criteria found in Section 4-3010, which provides in part that: a. The subject site has not been considered in a previous area-wide rezone or land use analysis: or b. The subject site is potentially designated for the new classification per the Comprehensive Plan: or c. There has been a material and substantial change in the circumstances in the area in which the subject site is located since the last rezoning of the property or area. The requested reclassification is justified. 2. The request is not only compatible with the map element of the Comprehensive Plan but it is also compatible with the existing uses on the site and surrounding uses. The H-1 zoning appears to be a holdover from when the site was occupied with a substantially larger Puget Power switching station and the power line corridor. 3. The area in the last 5 to 10 years has been modified to include the adjacent "Renton Places", the Evergreen building, the shopping center, the elimination of the large switch yard and the construction of SR-515. 4. The rezone will permit the establishment of high quality office buildings on the site. It will also enable the applicant to pursue legally compatible development on all portions of the subject site. The zoning is compatible with the area, the Comprehensive Plan and the applicant's needs, and should be approved by the City Council. RECOMMENDATION The City Council should approve the reclassification of the subject site from G-1 and H-1 to B-1. The Callison Partnership, R-016-86 May 7, 1986 Page 4 ORDERED THIS 7th day of May, 1986. FRED J. KAU AN HEARING EX INER TRANSMITTED THIS 7th day of May, 1986 to the parties of record: Tom Goeltz 1501 - 4th Avenue 2600 Century Square Seattle, Wa. 98101-1688 TRANSMITTED THIS 7th day of May, 1986 to the following: Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Richard Houghton, Public Works Director Larry M. Springer, Policy Development Director Members, Renton Planning Commission Ronald Nelson, Building & Zoning Director Glen Gordon, Fire Marshal Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator Lawrence J. Warren. City Attorney Renton Record-Chronicle Pursuant to Title IV. Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before May 21, 1986. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV. Section 3016. which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of $75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or' purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. For purposes of these decisions and recommendations the terms "Should" and "Shall" are to be considered mandatory. The term "May" will be considered discretionary. When the report is a recommendation to the City Council the terms "should" and "shall" are intended to inform the City Council that if they approve the recommendation the items should be mandatory to preserve the intent of the decision. {�Z� S[ 1 •„ �\r .. ,ii!ii .■ 00.00.00,o °o°o°p��• •'•• _ ;a .• • •:JL�� \ J 0000 ° o W n o c n j Ja °°00000°00000 ° 7i1, a i •r> ° oo• 0000 ��u'■se r I rE _ q . 0000= 'oo' 0`•1 ..r^ •M1 00000000 '!C 'o° nn ip _r r� �a, ,opopopp 0°°p0°o0 ° 00000 • �1 •' o 0 0°0 0 0 0 0mil,0 0p0p0 .. 1 •:; •°OO°oOOia•io o oo OpOro°00 �.r1r ll.r C110 0o0O000o° )1 i/• o-o' •t.:44.:044:1411 �y'� un .ram.cur � A ton � nlrar�- /;r:.'(:a1'� �� , \ rO.� 1:•111;1a .•0 No �.:±v�.yt/ !r . ,sal : 1� ••r l i.r�f • q¢•�'./a1'O o o o O o /■/•/.__ • ) P t I 1})•l *:0 .41 IV/ \ ' iL 1631 • �g1//1teg°O°O°O°O •..•fra■/I/ .` • /r��C r'yr• . ldd, 1 ` ` 88F ,moo ° / ia lu■•i��'1�'�/� ,', �:�'' i _ •.•1,tie{l;,,9•Y. _ `- - --iiiiiii•iiiiiiiiiiiii .'000 ••� • • e. y'?Lti?;{ {•:;yti; v'.•'.•:p}:.:•.: '�e:int /:�cC • 1 Ilan.al./a//11•a•1 °./- •'+ •a _ :Cry'1r.a 1.w �• .is.i iial00000.iini'isia/.: ' oaf'e' ' .'' „ y,t :.C)n ,v ,• t2 a t,•"! ® vr.=■H/r/HJC)1 ,Nu ■aH••u, r' « " •r 1;:#}•: t, �':�••.' .4.. r Aril . :: :1 t. fir'-,',wy,,'r --• c oniais� ,:■I:Hp/ T^• ^lv' iii ill , \ I ..••*. ::',,. •:'at); ■i paw:.'__ •• ISO•••,;,•:,,;•,A ::,,A;-:Ft' re . s:•••:c;.. • --......:.\ •i:i*:::•• • 3.:2:1• C::" .'`...." .,.s...-----•••--------.----- ..•:.::::!:ii:gii!;i: i L• I"4,•;••;::,•.::k,,•*•:':A a. IIII • •, ..... ..•: ''.4-"••••••.....V•,• •*":"'''.:;P....ri"I"% **".••4';:j.7 :7-h/FrAV--------- ''''''......••21,0.1..1., i.' 1...i:. .,,v 4•; r 1 .: ... ,.., „,ws:w',n g• .... •... • _Al_ o- `__= == -_ - .• , 1"f rt •'� oo°0000 I'= - ,I • � . 1::::',000 .w •i• ,. ;� ¢ 0000000000 -; __ -- _ L�r_1s ///■ol' ,.° o.., v.ia' ` . •`I" 1: :. g ,. 0000000000••; _ _ _ ■///•'.:.Mist .i••�� l. ,•,.,• 1� 1 (T' —.- •OOOOOOOOOO•J: _--- t __- /M_MM/rI/S.00 o l a• ••^• ` • t! �' 111 r i• • •00000000000•.C: - _ _ ■• 1 1 .■I, o __ 000000000000 ••:, -----' _ �'1 . 1�•.a `.�.•.,.. '� C •.;'� . -•• 0000°00°00000000.7J - 1 .! III M�` i is ' �'�•t\•,a \ . .�•�- .'O°°°°°000°°°000 - _{�- fir"� i , _ ) °-.•a•.� �•.. c' alt o0000000000000 : - :, C ` � .' ::::%%%i:, •'•:: ';. r I •M?. ^ , • 000000000000°.- --L .,r,�15 �� ;:_.,.•:........:..:.:,; �.:,.,, C •• 0000°a°Ooo°O • • i• oti •Ir.r- :::;:•::•::,;::.: 1 '. 114112....4M:::i•ii.iiii::i:i: :i:. ::.1i::::.•: ."-C3::.:::... • . . . • ....-....7 '' VSSA"Z..Ing IMV111111. Al iiiiiii1.1.11N.:•:•-•.:::'. '.:.: ' . . ••=:.•I. s. . / .fir* • --- \ .„'w •11114110 Wit 14o, .:::...:::.:::.:::: . it. .. ji,.....J., ;iv: i3,1 o a tis:Hs'1 ------- -------- ----------- '.',-..,." jai ' •°0 •:•:si::: *:''• •:. • i i.-_.. • • • n/1 1 _ EI:LEttF?Ifr t' IL•■ • • A1 • • • to • C ikk: • iHH; yl■1 f ' _ ___- ice;�..r� r C:" nu•. • 1 t;.• •• . diWSP'i•net-t- 110 `' •0`000°`e- I Al 0_1 ,'1.1 :..111• • •' i0 0000 00000 0 • , 11 ( r, OOOo• 000000• •. ■al III '• . _,•!= = --_ •... •0000 : 0000000 )•, • ' a..1 tl1,1'�.✓I'.II• tt•--- • ---- •.•l.• •0000. •t 00000 0 _ „i =_ _ - 00000 0000000 '1 ' ■....Q1 ..f• 1.2...2 --./.1 p '•'� - ---- •(:c 000. o0000C MBA 1 _-- •MPI _ ••000000• - -ow •1 '.F'1 10 -- - I+c 000 000.. 1H•.1: ••• . ---- -------- ^ •0000 • mr I:1 i: • • • .16 �1 " ' f -— =11ir_ �6 •_---- - l.ry :.uHH.11. I �.a -�-�_- '� --___- ---- •i1.aa 0000 }'•,:•,i`:?•}i}�4•:w:i11.~ilai t _ •�1��1 000000° .• __ -/' ---------- --- .iH Is./ 00000000 �c.•Y •�•�� �HIiH11' i •� ' , Y 1 00000000• 0 .• r • l t, ^. 000000000 00000000 • �, 1S; 000000°• Y".; C `:°000000• 1 P I,i.' r '' c l r,•a °000000• 7 �/ e°°°o° f �:le . ./�, 1��w�1� - • •-0000 f` • re+,• e 000.• .0000° .• }:_i• 1 LAND 0000. •': �-;ZLIP �_.:� • USE ELEMENT '°•° ;°:. •1 ,.jJ 1 r w• • Single Family Commercial ! 1 • Low Density \ •'=� Multi-Family \; Office / Office Park _ • A • iiiNiig Medium D®nsit ,..0.0.000000.0.000.'0000wr yy •....• MultDensi-Fa ly "° Public/Quasi-Public 0000 • oar- . fi High Density Light Industrial �ogogogogoo o° i ) • Multi-Family ° °°000eo°o°o°o°a Z . JJJ egop0p0°0gegogi C '000• voQ° o°°05 z Fix .. .Recreation .�0.•.•• Heavy Industrial 19 • Zgai: C0 i '� ' :i =_- o f;`z Greenbelt Manufacturing Park I ,k• ` 6 / Multiple Option _ ► ` Y 'i. _ _.._ ._ .._,4:1 1 ._ f� ! sir, \• 5..7"'"7"'—'7"----0 . I '•Vim ' 7 .t -. e ,• If 1 . 1 I. ..'. • .it ,/- i .:, 1 ! , /..1-.4.,- i...E • ;r1.1 .'. Q 1 � . . ' (la.',H—/ „ 1 ikI �'1 ��_ _ , -ram' • • 1 ' �i��lu�l 90541tCor , : , 1 l'ill 1 • s ;% III.., 0 0IMII/ C {• 6 ...., , 1 1 ' „� j �llll.y :III I�j' IIIMI,,,,t.�' ;; :�• - ;,�... . 'i.� � • �; 1, I Il II �, I ; t. , r.; R-4 III 4,,,,.. II ..,E t I; I . J 511111111 I �_ -yam_ • i, nnyy •"---.' --.----'-----'---:-.*-:--- . II ' 7-.) is'" Ir-,• OW' , 3'17:-1 6.4 „, .‘s \'!;2211kr• - •,:! •t:.•• • ': .:i 4 .1 ‘ 1 ; r,,, 4 . . .,) R—, I te-,*m"' I" iiWEEIL. ! /./i IIERI 11;11 - s, 'd I. "- --;77 ! li \\....... , rG. d TT1 n WOMB • J.1. . i i •.i_3r if I\ "" .. ��7,. • 49 .ate u� 3 \ , •� " III_ice . — - I A. ,, O-;_, ' 1 . rum .. -, is 1'-. l \ �\ \ urna von d -oOr�s •o• s,- — ar ), _....1._ Ii _ wi. ._ -1 -CO I-I , .- _.- —N 1010. , / a R ' a� •••:791' .1- 7/ . imEr G1 -_ -- = _ r� - _. o ., .a as a. o ' �- :.,......„_---r u...,. - gi . ' . .. . 2' id — i..,/ i - - ...,-7-• (....1/41::?' 1 '',: ••••'‘ , .%\ . '-' --"--7.Mg.115- 11A i 1%t. ?,. ,......:::,- . Al// . 44 . .• ....,. .,ji...4„zr..•• o,:,_ �__ - y11. ,s a ��' i t� " �r L J r - . /�/ r.:,..0, ... 1n.4nt HIII PARK CALLISON PARTNERSHIP, LTD. R-016-86 • APPLICANT THE CALLISON PARTNERSHIP, LTD TOTAL AREA - 15.44 ACRES PRINCIPAL ACCESS S.W. GRADY WAY & SOUTH RENTON VILLAGE PLACE EXISTING ZONING G-1, GENERAL USE AND H HEAVY INDUSTRIAL . EXISTING USE UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY AND OFFICE USE PROPOSED USE REZONE FOR FUTURE AND EXISTING OFFICE USES COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN COMMERCIAL COMMENTS • OF RA,A A ao . 0 THE CITY OF RENTON t z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 z &NIL o °' BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 90 `O• FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 4)4 67) SEP�E�O�P May 2, 1986 Mr. Tom Goeltz 1501 - 4th Avenue 2600 Century Square Seattle, Washington, 98101-1688 Re: The Callison Partnership Ltd. R-016-86 Dear Mr. Goeltz: It was brought to my attention after the close of the Public Hearing on your client's rezone request (R-016-86) that the legal notice published for the hearing was in error. Unfortunately, this Office has consistently taken the position that a defective notice is invalid. I understand that Building and Zoning did republish for May 6, 1986 and therefore, I will rehear the matter on that date. If this Office can be of any further assistance please feel free to call. Sincerely. • FRED J. KA FMAN HEARING EXAMINER FJK/dk cc: City Attorney City Clerk Building and Zoning Department 2348Z CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING APRIL 29. 1986 AGENDA COMMENCING AT 9:00 A.M.: COUNCIL CHAMBERS, SECOND FLOOR, RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING The applications listed are in order of application number only and not necessarily the order in which they will be heard. Items will be called for hearing at the discretion of the Hearing Examiner. BLAKLEY/DOYLE SHORT PLAT Application for short plat approval to subdivide 0.42 acres of property into two lots (file Short Plat-025-86): property located at 2905-2907 N.E. 7th Street. VALLEY OFFICE AND INDUSTRIAL PARK, INC. (AUSTIN CO.) PHASE II Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of a four story office building of 140,000 square feet (file SA-017-86): property located at 1601 East Valley Road. THE CALLISON PARTNERSHIP. LTD. Application to rezone 15.44 acres of property from H-1. Heavy Industrial. and G-1, General Use. to B-1. Business Use, for future development of "III Renton Place" and to enable zoning compliance for "II Renton Place" (file R-016-86); property located at the southwest corner of South Grady Way and Talbot Road South. 2359Z NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON ON MAY 6, 1986, AT 9:00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: THE CALLISON PARTNERSHIP, LTD. Application to rezone 15.44 acres from G-i, General Use, and H-1, Heavy Industrial, to B-1, Business Use, to allow future "III Renton Place" office building and zoning compliance with II Renton Place (file R-016-86); property located at southwest corner of South Grady Way and Talbot Road South. THE CALLISON PARTNERSHIP, LTD. Application for site plan approval to construct office building (III Renton Place) (file SA-032-86); property located at the southwest corner of South Grady Way and Talbot Road South. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Building and Zoning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON MAY 6, 1986, AT 9:00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. PUBLISHED : April 25, 1986 Ronald G. Nelson Building and Zoning Director CERTIFICATION I. JEANETTE SAMEK-MC KAGUE. HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for the §tate of Washington residing in R ?JT D on the Z-S Thi day of April, 1986. SIGNED• -Yrt, 2355Z BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING APRIL 29, 1986/MAY 6, 1986 APPLICANT: THE CALLISON PARTNERSHIP, LTD. FILE NUMBER: R-016-86 A. SUMMARY & PURPOSE OF REQUEST: The applicant seeks approval to rezone 15.44 acres of property from H-1. Heavy Industrial. and G-1. General Use, to B-1, Business Use. for future development of "III Renton Place" and to enable zoning compliance for "II Renton Place." B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record: Renton Village Company 2. Applicant: The Callison Partnership. Ltd. 3. Location: (Vicinity Map Attached) Southwest corner of South Grady Way and Talbot Road South 4. Existing Zoning: C-1, General Use: H-1. Heavy Industrial 5. Existing Zoning in the Area: G-I, General Use; B-1, Business Use; L-1, Light Industrial.; and H-1. Heavy Industrial 6. Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Commercial 7. Size of Property: ± 15.44 acres 8. Access: S.W. Grady Way and South Renton Village Place 9. Land Use: Undeveloped property together with an office building and associated parking areas 10. Neighborhood Characteristics: North: Undeveloped Property East: Light Industrial Use South: Parking Lot; I-405 West: Commercial/Office Uses C. HISTORY/BACKGROUND: Action File Ordinance Date Annexation --- 1547 June 5, 1956 G-1, General Zone - on-site since 1953 when zoning ordinance and map adopted for City Rezone (S-1 to H-1) 1741 March 24, 1959 D. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1. Utilities: a. Water: There is a 24-inch water line that ends at the far northeast corner of the subject site; a 6-inch water line along the west property line: and a 12-inch line along South Renton Village Place. PRELIMINARY REPORT THE HEARING EXAMINER THE CALLISON PARTNErNardIP. LTD.. FILE NO. R-016-86 • APRIL 29. 1986/MAY 6. 1986 v„ PAGE 2 b. Sewer: An 8-inch sanitary sewer line is located along the west property line. An 18-inch sanitary sewer line is located along Talbot Road South and along South Renton Village Place adjacent to the subject property. 2. Fire Protection: Provided by the City of Renton as per =ordinance requirements. 3. Transit: Metro transit route No. 912 operates along S.W. Grady Way and transit routes No. 149 and 156 operate along Talbot Road South near the subject site. A Metro park-and-ride lot is located on the north side of South Grady Way northwest of the subject site. 4. Schools: a. Elementary Schools: N/A b. Middle Schools: N/A c. High Schools: N/A 5. ,Recreation: Talbot Hill Park (new name) is located approximately .7 of a mile south of the subject property. Some passive recreation will be provided on-site as part of future development plans. E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1. Section 4-704. General Use (G-1). 2. Section 4-713. Heavy Industrial (H-1). F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT: 1. Commercial Goal and Objectives: Commercial Areas Objective and Commercial Structure and Sites Objective. Policy Element. City of Renton. Comprehensive Plan Compendium. January 1985. p. 61-67. 2. Section 3014(C). Change of Zone Classification (Rezone). G. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1. The applicant. The Callison Partnership, Ltd., is requesting a rezone of 15.44 acres from G-1. General Use, and H-1, Heavy Industrial. to B-1. Business Use. to allow the future construction of "III Renton Place". an office building, and bringing into compliance "II Renton Place". an office building that is presently under construction. The zoning request is a necessity resulting from the change in the language of the Heavy Industrial zone. The property is located on the southwest corner of the intersection of S.W. Grady Way and Talbot Avenue South. The site will ultimately house two 7-story office buildings containing approximately 131.000 square feet. 2. The Environmental Review Committee has issued a declaration of non-significance for the subject rezone request. file number R-016-86. subject to the condition that site plan approval would be required for the development of "III Renton Place." In addition to the site plan review, the specific environmental concerns of traffic circulation. storm water drainage, and recreational facilities would be addressed. The applicant has filed a site plan approval request that will be heard before the Hearing Examiner on Tuesday, May 6th. 3. The Hearing Examiner in reviewing a request for rezoning must consider specific criteria established under Section 4-3014(C)(1): a. That substantial evidence was presented demonstrating the subject reclassification appears not to have been specifically considered at the time of the last area land use analysis and area zoning. PRELIMINARY REPORT THE HEARING EXAMINER THE CALLISON PARTNERSHIP, LTD.. FILE NO. R-016-86 APRIL 29. 1986/MAY 6, 1986 PAGE 3 The property that is being reviewed has not been considered by the City of Renton since the implementation of the Central Area Plan in March of 1983. In fact, the City of Renton had initially contemplated an area-wide rezone that would have addressed the problem of non-conforming uses on the subject site. The final area-wide rezone only covered the Green River Valley and excluded this area from its scope of action. b. That the property is potentially classified for the proposed zone being requested pursuant to the policies set forth in the Comprehensive Plan and conditions have been met which would indicate the change is appropriate. The Comprehensive Plan designates the subject site as Commercial. The area lying east of Talbot Road South is designated as Office Park. The intersection of S.W. Grady Way and Talbot Road South is one of the most active intersections in the City of Renton. c. That since the last previous land use analysis of the area zoning of the subject property, authorized public improvements. permitted private development or other circumstances affecting the subject property have undergone significant and material change. Major development has been occurring in the general area. Presently. one major office building is under construction on the site and another 9-story building is being built within 1,000 feet to the northeast. With the construction of SR-515, access from the southeastern portion of the City to the general vicinity of the subject site has increased dramatically. Therefore, both public and private improvements suggest that there is a major trend towards the higher use of the property as offices and office parks. d. The final test to determine whether a rezone is appropriate is to address the question of timeliness. The subject site is in an area that is undergoing a high degree of transition from undeveloped and retail commercial to a major employment center in the form of mid-rise office buildings. Public improvements and private development suggest that the area is strongly in transition and is supportive of the zoning reclassification request. H. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION: Based upon the above analysis, it is recommended that the rezone request, file number R-016-86, be recommended for approval to the City Council. ..I•'I •• , �•:' i 4 ' If I -1 ' / i /' 1 ''' ' ! I / 1:7', . ..r •IQl ' I• , i'1,0** i• Ar"At r L n 3. 1. s `' I ',14-1 ZI I I - ►.'01101111"IIIIIMMllp�1 i‘11/67tCr. 1 A4 I IS iten I I l��, 'IIUIIt 11 IIIIM��' . 6 5-1 I ` N _ l . A 1 1101 :I ill awn�� Ill r 'il\ .� �� ; 11:1,''.:11 � `... . I :=�:;. , 1....li'. ill Il1'� 6t / / -III„ q Ii, )� _ MT(R•-��':E u - _ ' .J 11114 _z_.7_......_•.7-•'---.:arzz.--__:.---.--' "1,_---1-F-ritA• : :41.: "Ai' ,�M i M : ;-"_� ii„ /.: idl l :; „R •`' S a� R— i,)___. ....._ •1i it s I_`_,Eo\ I �a 1 illikV „ ;� I. • ! T I. II\ \\•1,. - : - ' ; R .• !4 �•� J.. �k4: ® • , - •O .T.-., l.1. w- 4 _ ` � ' !_ =A _.= i .. A-1 .,,,- -- c- . R- 1 \ �B 1 i/ ' c .1- •--trr • \\I! r L.._ _ /, y .' -a -,-. 1 .:, IILL l 1 --_- . - G /in,af,t HIIIF"ALPK° CALLISON PARTNERSHIP, LTD. R-016-86 • • APPLICANT THE CALLISON PARTNERSHIP, LTD TOTAL AREA - 15.44 ACRES PRINCIPAL ACCESS S.W. GRADY WAY & SOUTH RENTON VILLAGE. PLACE EXISTING ZONING G-1, GENERAL USE AND H-1, HEAVY INDUSTRIAL EXISTING USE UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY AND OFFICE USE • PROPOSED USE REZONE FOR FUTURE AND EXISTING OFFICE USES COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN COMMERCIAL ' COMMENTS - 00000 O��S,■■ 0 0 0 0 0 °0°O°O• j III .n..4 0•1 • •••S,.4: = I k ` ■■ cpop00000000 0 0 ��. ::. ._1:.:.:.i:.:.i:.:.l.:1.ii.:.l.:ns ._ ■■ 0IIIN 00000_c t.000p• l■ 4.1 lIi ■ O-1 ■ oo° . o°o° • t n r l • 1 •r .' •o ' r■r °°o°o°°°o o°o°o 'l!' °g.11 •ire uer 'oo\ • ` ril 000e00000po ° ■I■ prays. y ' .•p0p0po •t_ ■■1 •°p°O°O°p°p0000°000\ia0o iiii ■.■r°°000°po° ii o 0 0 ornanr...O°°• ,py °•) . „ m ■■ • 0000 n Ail 1 IIIIW Ite IlatiwiLiNdhad WE al MIMI IP IP Mr NNitzvolgr AZ; J it I' W.' I •Vat. ,I OOO aV .11 f �• ti• t• I9l■■lone 000000000 I■■■■ i •r y ▪ .( V 000 1■■• • Inn Ma iI n. 00 `'•\ i :.'•(n':\p n15.43 t.. l i■■t mimosa ■■■■11■■■1 • /� •-• .■■ N•=n • ! M ,/, •n•::.•'$•::•}r} �•tF 1l'.k 1•I:• .• 1l'C .t+, afr '4,.•••••tlimo ■■allim1■. ■•• I^ . \ r-+1y�^ -- ' i:•,:1; '-,'\` Mill `•M■.•ilian ' ,'r , ^*••1�.t.;r 1■1■■■■■■■,• A■11•■•■I ill■11■" %/.�•!.` y I■� - +• 1.gQ1 ,r,,cr. .:•-y‘,. ^ ...I c/..,... :. ---------_-_. --•••• ......,-.%• :•:••••::•::::.,1 L. L lir :v%::>.; .:.,:.,w.:1 it. •,.. .,,:::: :... a. - ••^ _ ' _— l����yy — _ ——_ —— sac:1 `•Y. \ii'::,„kW 0' di. I, 1 - -� Moo^ '� -- 1:0g. `co- ---- ___ - - • • , .0000• .---------..-/.o00oG• M IV 41, _-_-__ X -�o�L il%i1�i ` 111 4 = • - °o°o°o o°o°o°o o°o o'.'J`•: -__-- v.■■ 1 MP.a r.+ �'•c•%•t' ----- __r ••.• •p _- •'00000• 000000•.C: �.�- I- 1 .■►.. _ •0000000000000•• `�./ �1 • I \• C • OOo0o0o00000o0•!i: \1 _ �"I I■ ■ �I� ` / :. •.1.';•: . of .'000000000000000 __ tia.a Weil 1 .•1•• :::i:3>::. 'iiim: ` .. ; 000000000000•0: 5:: _ tiiii - 1 1 `.if. -r+t'+++•.a \ /X} riIi / •-• k.l si i...Z:.:.:::::*::..::'::'.:::.•4::•.:.•:::;:.:;*..:.:i:*.:.i'•:::.*1.::.::::::i::.;:i.:.::::i::::.:f:.'.,•:.:•. •.[•:'•:')• •':.i.:',..... ..•.• El, 1'■ -_ .� if a. • 1 • • • III■1 tt •_ _ ____ O°O•__ •� •0 O O • ice' :i::i r {ii� _ ___= po'-== �1' 1■■■M'� Ill./ 1 li - - ;9i9 •••' .?• .. ---.. aims 111■l■ 1 ---- ' - C:' w ::U l t• l iiQgW�lf1S7RF0 .• 0000 `0000 • •S \ I a■ r-1 1'III ..■.1 ? 1 - y 0000 000000- •■ ■■1 II, „• __- _ _=_ . •0000 000.000 ), • ' al■al•■.,G''' 111 v _-_ --__-- 1. •0000•y� lain•■■ •;F In _ _ - 00000 nun let•:1• nisi.••= ■■■�c �- �- X �_ 000. °°o°o°o°o°c°O• , _ ,,. . 4, •1 11 �.E!■ �.! l -—.- —_ _-- :. /; •0000• .. . ...,.. r ��••-'�.• •-A.!.P 6*°',,-:.� •:;r� ,�... col .r LT': • j I 6 . • ... ___. . .. V. .I�SJRV — r-" .., r, ts :6 •f . __=f _,._ _- JuryMal u■ a■)l mow I a 1 1 •..�. _ ---- - •■ '�• •": :,a■■■■al lama -_—— _ _- - _- •no■ 0000 :.:•:. amai w■1 00000000• Si. 'oo...... 1.•e• - elier•Ari�Y' • lir i• f�. _ _ ,_• ro 00000000 � all■.'� _ o0000000•'• l . o00000000 C •• i J' ip" ::::: _C __ .■I :::0000•, :::•:;F:f. `:::0000• ): y • z, t n��� \-e.o°o°o°o° _ %V 1 1� ti. /•'0000:. •°0o0o0o0o• : :Vic»•1 v oo -`oo • ' "�:� `: • LAND USE ELEMENT • •°y Single Family • Commercial I • • 1 • Low Density \ '_'� • .......• Multi-Family \\ Office / Office Park , • i . °°.°000 Medium Densit '°°°°°°°' ��� •0000 Public/Quasi-Public Multi-Fa mi�ji .000000.00.0/°. , �° • - boo°°0000 . _ . 1 • " High Density Light Industrial iogogogoeogog � a • Multi-Family ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° • • °o °o°SC(9 Z • °,000°°°Op°°00• G , t Recreation �•�.�• HeavyIndustrial 19 a • . p0c I -J pope k▪ F ri% Greenbelt ____ Manufacturing Park 0.. ° / Multiple Option j --�. —� -� _ ___ .- .. _ ._ 1 ( . REVIEWINGi DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : f'GIcY c( V i- P/YY N 1 . APROVED El 'ROVED WITH CONDITIONS .. El NOT APPROVED ....._ it j4Q "fir j 4\4 ,.e.,..).,u2 4 . . 4 _. t•. : r r 1 `7). YC� / t4 vt a . DATE: L.- f 6 SIGNATURE; OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : B4-1--)� APPROVED El APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS Ej NOT APPROVED (D /" Lam - S G cQuG:� -,/ • : --7 :, / • ; „ ' �.�-- e Cl/7C-7e- DATE: 2—Z�4SIGNAT ' ,OF DIRECTOR ORRIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 REVIE INC DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : ZOi'LIMQ-) • APPROVED a APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS E NOT APPROVED • RE c,Ovvl iAel eK)o R. •zOrvE, Ai rPPrk.ovPiu P1/41v0. su 666s-( 1O 11)P6 I(AAA' it 5t.C,ON siZX m PAIK.7018R. eV R-i (Ors) v tLL C6 S116 i-o 90.1 VNOF6RN 1r01O 60,4.1RAA cf., w 111 _1 C)0YvI pRFt- tUSIv6 'PLAN 44 • • • F. alm CO� DATE: 3 f7 - 80 SIGNATURE OF DIR TOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE -•— • ---„•,..+, ua.rnRll'IC.IVI/U1V1510N: . DAPPRVED TKFROVED WITH CONDITION NOT APPROVED /_+ / '"e/ce?0,[F / *f'f.. C0.4dt's �- C/ s>S77';- ; ,Q /9y>0.Pc,0Y-:0 /257 77 /err:elf e9e1,7- �.��ul. o Ccve—._; 1 77 c:/eti • • SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVEATE; FF-B• -1 i --- REVISION 5/1982 -L—.--. Form 182 REVIEWINCY'DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; S APPROVED PROVED WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED trpa VVLUI..70\• t � S GNATUREI`OF DIR CTOR OR DATE: g� AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : n APPF 'VED 'AppROVED WITH CONDITIONS I ! NOT APPROVED' COMMENTS: 1) Major concern about traffic entering and leaving the area. The two present entrances on Grady Way should be improved. Especially the entrance closest to the Sheraton Inn. needs to be widened and signal needs to be improved. Traffic system in the shopping area can not presently handle the traffic from the one present building, much less' the building under construction and then an additional building. 2) Need another entrance to the site off of Grady Way by the Gull station, wou suggest right in and right out only entrance. ld 3) Need another entrance on Talbot road between Grady Way & Renton Village P1 . again it should be right in & right out only. 4) Major,concerns about car prowls in the parking lots ' 'tea • G ., SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR R AUTHCRT7Fn RcDI�CCCflITATT��DATE; 3 ‘ - REVIEWINC' DEPARTMENT/DIVTCTON : TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION APPF VED I 'J .., -PROVED WITH CONDITIONS 1ZNOT APPROVED 1 . Provide City with action plan and letter of commitment for car and vanpooling. . Building to have an information center for Metro transit and vanpooling. This is to help reduce traffic impact. 2. Project development impact at the intersection of Rainier Ave. South and South Grady Way is 3% increase. The development should contribute to the intersection improvement at 3% of the cost of improving the efficiency of the intersection. Widening of Grady Way - Maple Ave. SW to Rainier, 7 ft. $300,000 Channelization modification 10,000 1. 5310,000 3% x 310,000 = $5,300.00 assessment#3 - #$ a ached DATE: ,.7 // S/ SIGNATURE1OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZEDREPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 3. Development should contribute to cost of widening of Puget Drive South 'at Talbot Road South to accommodate a dual westbound right turn lane. 3% x 40,000 = $1 ,200.00 assessment 4. .)-in Grady Way South at the existing most easterly entrance/exit point the shrubs that exist cause a sight distance problem when looking westerly. ` Phis problem to be addressed. 5. ; ieferenced entrance in item above should be opened up in the development o prevent cars from backing up into Grady Way South. 6. ( roposed new most easterly entrance on Grady Way is undesirable to traffic l low and should be eliminated. 7. More details of the proposed entrance on Talbot Road South need to be shown. Example: number of lanes into site, width of entrance proposed .and channelization on Talbot Road South using the centerlane left turn. %-2uestion: Are two lanes into site needed to prevent backup on to Talbot `toad? 8. ?age 16 of the Traffic Analysis - provide mitigating measure proposals . co reduc&t Prated intersection to a 'D' level of service. Provide cost ?.stimates for those measures. REVIEWING .DEPARTMENT/DIVISION; ` , APPROVED p_, )PROVED WITH NDITIONS 0 NOT APPROVED, . • • • DATE: SIGNATURE ,OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 i, Form 182 • REVIEWING ,DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; l%/,G/Ty • V ,Al,EsEE /VG APPF VED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED girlagELPMCT 1TI • . LATE Cart AMEEM_IT-WATER . LATE CIS ASKEW-SEWER No SYSTEM I VELOPMENT CHARGE-WATER YES T.o¢�SQ• FrZ 72,4029 `2�. gq� o SYSTEM D''ROPIEST CHARGE-SEWER yrs. P0.04/ 4 G 72,¢02 4' W Sql� /- (0 SPECIAL 1 `+ESSMENT A:?Eii fliI1RGE-WAVER /�/0 053' 792' SPECIAL A! ESSMENT afARGE-SEWER NO 4A fie APPROVED PATER PLAN _ APPROVE[ EWER PLAN - AFrROVED FIRE MAR .k1WNS • AIL III NM NOM Wad~ • BY FIRE DEPT. MINIM COOSISICTIOI' FICz 11. .;AN • DATE: 3/ /� /ry e SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE • • REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 • • • • • • • • OF A A qv AD Cj , ® 0 z BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT -i sal RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR o MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON.WASH.98055 • 235-2540 ,0 co- 0 ,Q.4r�O SEPZtg'�P BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR MEMORANDUM DATE; April 11, 1986 TO: Fred J. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner FROM: Environmental Review Committee SUBJECT: THE CALLISON PARTNERSHIP, LTD.. FILE NO. R-016-86 LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF'SOUTH GRADY WAY • AND TALBOT ROAD SOUTH The E"`vironmental Review Committee (ERC) has analyzed the information submitted by . the C; lison Partnership, Ltd., to rezone 15.44 acres from H-1. Heavy Industrial. to B-1, Busine > Use, to allow the future construction of "III Renton Place." Based upon the enviro' mental information submitted with the application. the Environmental ,Review Committee has issued a declaration of non-significance for the rezone only. They have found that the information is insufficient in the areas of storm water drainage. traffic generation. and on-site recreation to release the environmental declaration for the proposed building.. The Environmental Review Committee, therefore. conditions the declaration of non-significance for the rezone subject to the condition that the rules and regulations governinc+ `he State_,F-•firnnmental Policy. '�Yil appiic�.: the individual site plan review. The EIAC also wishes to inform the Hearing Examiner and the applicant that the City's new site'plan approval process will most probably be applicable to the subject site because the rezone application presently being reviewed could not possibly be completed prior to the anticipated enactment date of the site plan ordinance. Therefore. all parties should be aware that a separate site plan approval will most probably be required. Under Section 4-2822(D). the decision maker must accept these conditions as binding upon his ulf`;mate decision unless he identifies in writing a substantial error in fact or conclusion by the Environmental Review Committee. The decision maker then has the option of asking the Environmental Review Committee for reconsideration for revising the recommended conditions. The..applicant also has the ability to request reconsideration of these conditions from the ERr or appeal these conditions directly to the Hearing Examiner under authority granted In . action 4-2823(A)(1)(a) within fourteen (14) days of the date that the DNS is final. The,afore, the appeal date would be Monday, April 28. 1986. at 5 p.m. Appeals must be submitted in the form prescribed by both the Environmental Ordinance of the City of Renton and the Hearing Examiner Ordinance, Section 4-3011(B). • RJB:ss • 1086r I • ' cc:' �a....,,,,. :7artnership. Ltd. Attention: Rick King 1423 Third Avenue ;eattle. Washington 98101 "he Renton Village Company • .ttention: Everett Johnson Evergreen Building 15 South Grady Way Renton, Washington 98055 1078N CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO.: ECF-014-86 • APPLICATION NO(s).: R-016-86 DESC UIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application to rezone 15.44 acres from H-1 to B-1 to allow future "III Renton Place" office building and zoning compliance with II Renton Place. PROPONENT: The Callison Partnership. Ltd. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Property located at southwest corner of South Grady Way and Talbot Road South. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton. Building and Zoning Department. The .`a ad agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable signii cant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) Is nd ;required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a comi ted environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This formation is available,to the public on request. Additional conditions were imposed as mitigating measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-2822(D) Renton Municipal Code. Respi ,isible Official: Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South. Renton. WA 98055 ' Phone: 235-2550 APPEAL: You may appeal this determination in writing to Renton Hearing Examiner no later than April 14. 1986. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact City of Renton. Building and Zoning Department to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. DATE OF DECISION: March 26. 1986 PUBLICATION DATE: March 31, 1986 AI2J • I nal G. Nelson . • y 41111#: . Spri •_ Building and Zoning Director Policy Develop, :nt D or RIc rd C. ughton Public Works Director RENTC. -,BUILDING & ZONING DEPAr7OIENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 014 _ 86 ' APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE: R-016-86 PROPONENT : THE CALLISON PARTNERSHIP, LTD. PROJECT TITLE : RENTON VILLAGE COMPANY REZONE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 15.44 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM H-1 TO B-1 IN ORDER TO MAKE T 1 BUILDING. ON THE SITE AND TO ALLOW A THIRD BUILDING HAVING 130,000 SQ. FT. TO BE BUILT ON THE SUBJECT SITE. LOCATION : LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST INTERSECTION OF SOUTH GRADY WAY & TALBOT ROAD SOUTH. TO : PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 3/12/86 EtENGINEERING DIVISION l ( TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : , ( UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU Ell PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT 0 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT El POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M, ON MARCH 6, 1986 L ' REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : \ El APPROVED APPROVED WITH C NDITIONS NOT APPROVED DATE: SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 RENTC BUILDING & ZONING DEPAr—'IAENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 014 _ 86 APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE: R-016-86 PROPONENT : THE CALLISON PARTNERSHIP, LTD. PROJECT TITLE : RENTON VILLAGE COMPANY REZONE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 15.44 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM H-1 TO B-1 IN ORDER TO MAKE T 1 BUILDING, ON THE SITE AND TO ALLOW A THIRD BUILDING HAVING 130,000 SQ. FT. TO BE BUILT ON THE SUBJECT SITE. LOCATION : LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST INTERSECTION OF SOUTH GRADY WAY & TALBOT ROAD SOUTH. TO : El PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 3/12/86 El ENGINEERING DIVISION n TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : XUTILITIES ENG , DIVISION 111 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU 111 PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT .BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT El POLICE DEPARTMENT El POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P ,M, ON MARCH 6, 1986 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : (_4/,././Ty • -A/, i/t/,E.E,//V1 n APPROVED X APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS I INOT APPROVED raTIELIPPL TO LATE LM AIREEMENT-WATER ? W--134 LATE MRS AQREEMER-SEWER p10 SYSTEM DEYELOPMENT CHARGE-WATER YE5 fre•0¢js4. Arm 6D.7,4t2 a = 7 2�, g�( o g SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-SEWED yr• A0,D4�So. 4T. G72,4102L --.Trq�' ePECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CURGE-WATER WOy 53, 792. 1�0 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREn CHARGE-SEWER All) APPROVED WATER PLAN APPROVED SEWER PLAN APw13OVED FIRE HYDRAIdt . CAEIONS ILtFN>8s ms s RMII T MCRIIIdINE� W BY FIRE DEPT. METER OPPUCATIONS PRIOR TO NIT CONSTRUCTION. 1-07 DATE: 3/ /b /y6e, SIGNATUREOF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 • RENTC"`BUILDING & ZONING DEPAEMIIENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 014 - 86 APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE: R-016-86 PROPONENT : THE CALLISON PARTNERSHIP, LTD. PROJECT TITLE : RENTON VILLAGE COMPANY REZONE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 15.44 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM H-1 TO B-1 IN ORDER TO MAKE T BUILDING.. ON THE SITE AND TO ALLOW A THIRD BUILDING HAVING 130,000 SQ.' FT. TO BE BUILT ON THE SUBJECT SITE. LOCATION: LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST INTERSECTION OF SOUTH GRADY WAY & TALBOT ROAD SOUTH. TO : El PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 3/12/86 El ENGINEERING DIVISION tIRITRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : ( UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT 1::] BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT ' 0 POLICE DEPARTMENT 0 POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT . 0 OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON MARCH 6, 1986 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION • El APPROVED LI APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ANOT APPROVED 1 . Provide City with action plan and letter of commitment for car and vanpooling. Building to have an information center for Metro transit and vanpooling.. This is to help reduce traffic impact. 2. P1roject development impact at the intersection of Rainier Ave. South and South Grady Way is 3% increase. The development should contribute to the intersection improvement at 3% of the cost of improving the efficiency of the intersection. Widening of Grady Way - Maple Ave. SW to Rainier, 7 ft. $300,000 Channelization modification 10,000 $310,000 3% x 310,000 = $9,300.00 assessment #3 - #$ attached DATE: , / e/ SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 THREE RENTON PLACE 3. Development should contribute to cost of widening of Puget Drive South at Talbot Road South to accommodate a dual westbound right turn lane. 3% x 40,000 = $1 ,200.00 assessment 4. On Grady Way South at the existing most easterly entrance/exit point the shrubs that exist cause a sight distance problem when looking westerly. This problem to be addressed. 5. Referenced entrance in item above should be opened up in the development to prevent cars from backing up into Grady Way South. 6. Proposed new most easterly entrance on Grady Way is undesirable to traffic flow and should be eliminated. 7. More details of the proposed entrance on Talbot Road South need to be shown. Example: number of lanes into site, width of entrance proposed and channelization on Talbot Road South using the centerlane left turn. Question: Are two lanes into site needed to prevent backup on to Talbot Road? 8. Page 16 of the Traffic Analysis - provide mitigating measure proposals to reduce` 4 ' rated intersection to a 'D' level of service. Provide cost estimates for those measures. RENTQ- BUILDING & ZONING DEPAV 1ENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET i J.r f °/ ECF - 014 - 86 ' APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE: R-016-86 PROPONENT , THE CALLISON PARTNERSHIP, LTD. I, PROJECT TITLE : RENTON VILLAGE COMPANY REZONE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 15.44 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM H-1 TO B-1 IN ORDER TO MAKE T 1 BUILDING. ON THE SITE AND TO ALLOW A THIRD BUILDING HAVING 130,000 SQ.• FT. TO BE BUILT ON THE SUBJECT SITE. LOCATION : LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST INTERSECTION OF SOUTH GRADY WAY & TALBOT ROAD SOUTH. TO : , El PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 3/12/86 s El ENGINEERING DIVISION 0 TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : FlUTILITIES ENG , DIVISION • JMFIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT 0 'BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT El POLICE DEPARTMENT Li POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT . El OTHERS : 1 COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON MARCH 6, 1986 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 111 APPROVED PPROVED WITH CONDITIONS n NOT APPROVED ! / ,Q93/i e .s g Aee- ec i v - C'Gv/' Q,r>,2,.,vCv�� wT 5Ys7025 /2S AL,/,:e0U.ei9 /3y L/Z;E OE�i .g Alhaligrz' s=7=5, I /,.efoe 7 Cdec s ® 7-7ai2 a "C 6/�, ,� DATE: �6B• .��, /99-' SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 RENTC'' BUILDING & ZONING DEPA711IENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 014 - 86 . APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE: R-016-86 PROPONENT ; THE CALLISON PARTNERSHIP, LTD. PROJECT TITLE : RENTON VILLAGE COMPANY REZONE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT; APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 15.44 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM H-1 TO B-1 IN ORDER TO MAKE THE LUNING IN CUMNLIGHNCE W11H IHt ONE EXISIiNG urriut BUILDING.. ON THE SITE AND TO ALLOW A THIRD BUILDING HAVING 130,000 SQ. FT. TO BE BUILT ON THE SUBJECT SITE. LOCATION ; LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST INTERSECTION OF SOUTH GRADY WAY & TALBOT ROAD SOUTH. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 3/12/86 ❑ ENGINEERING DIVISION El TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : ri UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT OPOLICE DEPARTMENT OPOLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 00THERS : 1 COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 ; 00 P .M, ON MARCH 6, 1986 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; (Wp,� APPROVED PROVED WITH CONDITIONS I ( NOT APPROVED ,g,i,t4yr_e_ \,-(Ata.-- 0/\.1 i I , J� picr\,�-2 � ( �(s) .L DATE; S GNATURE OF DIR CTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 RENTQ'`' BUILDING & ZONING DEPAIr TENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 014 - 86 APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE: R-016-86 PROPONENT : THE CALLISON PARTNERSHIP, LTD. PROJECT TITLE : RENTON VILLAGE COMPANY REZONE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TQ REZONE APPROXIMATELY 15.44 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM H-1 TO B-1 IN ORDER TO MAKE T 1 BUILDING. ON THE SITE AND TO ALLOW A TH RD BUILDING HAVING 130,000 SQ. FT. TO BE BUILT ON THE SUBJECT SITE. LOCATION : LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST INTERSECTION OF SOUTH GRADY WAY & TALBOT ROAD SOUTH. TO : 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 3/12/86 0 ENGINEERING DIVISION l ( TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : F-1 UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT 0 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT El POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT El OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT ' BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON MARCH 6, 1986 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : OAPPROVED 'APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 11] NOT APPROVED ,Sfi DATE: 3‘cg- SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISIQN 5/1982 Form 182 RENTCi BUILDING & ZONING DEPAfl ENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET CITY OF RENTON ECF - 014 - 86 • E B 2 6 1986 APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE: R-016-86 POLICY Y��•,�LUPM� r!I !!cPr, PROPONENT : THE CALLISON PARTNERSHIP, LTD. PROJECT TITLE : RENTON VILLAGE COMPANY REZONE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 15.44 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM H-1 TO B-1 IN ORDER TO MAKE T 1 BUILDING. ON THE SITE AND TO ALLOW A THIRD BUILDING HAVING 130,000 SQ. FT. TO BE BUILT ON THE SUBJECT SITE. LOCATION : LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST INTERSECTION OF SOUTH GRADY WAY & TALBOT ROAD SOUTH. TO : El PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 3/12/86 • El ENGINEERING DIVISION n TRAFFIC ENG, DIVISION SpEDULED HEARING DATE : ( UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU El PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT .BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT El OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P ,M, ON MARCH 6, 1986 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : PP/WY cLVt /YW1J I APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS El NOT APPROVED Al4Q ifrezrj 4\ AO-en-a 4 , 1 ( 5 DATE : LR/v/ a SIGNATURE OF DIRE TOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 RENTC;t" BUILDING & ZONING DEPAr—AENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 014 _ 86 • APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE: R-016-86 PROPONENT : THE CALLISON PARTNERSHIP, LTD. PROJECT TITLE : RENTON VILLAGE COMPANY REZONE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 15.44 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM H-1 TO B-i IN ORDER TO MAKE T t BUILDING.. ON THE SITE AND TO ALLOW A THIRD BUILDING HAVING 130,000 SQ. FT. TO BE BUILT ON THE SUBJECT SITE. LOCATION : LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST INTERSECTION OF SOUTH GRADY WAY & TALBOT RQAD SOUTH. TO : PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 3/12/86 DENGINEERING DIVISION OTRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : OUTILITIES ENG , DIVISION , FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU [71:1PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT 14BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT ['POLICE DEPARTMENT OPOLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 00THERS : COMMEIITS OR SUGGESTION'S REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHQULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P ,M, ON MARCH 6, 1986 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 5JL-"D . APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 0 NOT APPROVED (,0 Sie-ece.?e- 62--/ 1 , ;7� DATE : SIGNATU' of DIRECTOR OR UTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 RENTC " 'BUILDING & ZONING DEPAI, $ENT , DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 014 _ 86 • . APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE: R-016-86 PROPONENT : THE CALLISON PARTNERSHIP, LTD. PROJECT TITLE : RENTON VILLAGE COMPANY REZONE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 15.44 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM H-1 TO B-1 IN ORDER TO MAKE T 1 BUILDING. ON THE SITE AND TO ALLOW A THIRD BUILDING HAVING 130,000 SQ. FT. TO BE BUILT ON THE SUBJECT SITE. LOCATION : LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST INTERSECTION OF SOUTH GRADY WAY & TALBOT ROAD SOUTH. TO : 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 3/12/86 El ENGINEERING DIVISION n TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : l ( UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU 0 PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT in BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 0 POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT El OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO ,THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M, ON MARCH 6, 1986 i REVIE ING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Z Dr ) IfV • IX‘41 APPROVED 0 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS1 0 NOT APPROVED Rc C,Ovv-I►w1 cm p Re z10 1zdo NE Ai PPRoQioku Fvo0 SV G , s-( ti l CANNq TO REz,o, \ nexPAikyoft, eir 1 fo-fon) v tiLL PiG6 •. -7 tio 1TI4 C)OYvl IpRE t-1klU 51 v6 '(>LINq �i `2J 1. & DATE: 3- /' ow SIGNATURE OF DIR TOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE \ REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 PTh 2346Z NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON. WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL. RENTON. WASHINGTON ON APRIL 29, 1986. AT 9:00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: VALLEY OFFICE AND INDUSTRIAL PARK, INC..(AUSTIN CO.) PHASE II Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of a four story office building of 140.000 square feet (file SA-017-86); property located at 1601 East Valley Road. THE CALLISON PARTNERSHIP, LTD. Application to rezone 15.44 acres of property from H-1. Heavy Industrial to B-1, Business Use, for future development of "III Renton Place" and to enable zoning compliance for "II Renton Place" (file R-016-86); property located at the southwest corner of South Grady Way and Talbot Road South. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Building and Zoning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON APRIL 29, 1986, AT 9:00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. • PUBLISHED : April 18. 1986 Ronald G. Nelson Building and Zoning Director CERTIFICATION I. JEANETTE SAMEK-MC KAGUE, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE __ -,. pOCUMENTS_yllEIPC' F B_Y_.� � �_ N , THREE- THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me. a Notary Public. in and for the State of Washington residing in 610-0 V on the a 1, day of April, 1986. C d SIGNE r W • c.3. 6 .° c3TicE o9„e9 F0 SEPZ City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner will hold a puotic HEARING in CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL `rON • APRIL .29, 198E BEGINNING AT 9: 00 A.M. . P.M. CONCERNING: THE CALLISON PARTNERSHIP, LTD. REZONE From H-1 HEAVY' INDUSTRIA`To B BUSINESS1 USE X - rl. SPECIAL / CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT To SITE . APPROVAL SHORT PLAT/SUBDIVISION of Lots PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT [] VARIANCE FROM rl GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SOUTH GRADY WAY & TALBOT ROAD SOUTH LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON FILE IN THE RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT.'; ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION El SIGNIFICANT © NON—SIGNIFICANT • FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING&ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 ' • THIS NOTICE NOT•7TO:,; BE REMOVED :WITHOUT • ': ?ROPER; AUTHORIZATION r-, ". OF RE • A �s? A. 0 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT v ovr.�: z RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR Z o ..LL MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON.WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 O,Qgr�D SEP1��O�Q BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR MEMORANDUM DATE: April 11. 1986 TO: Fred J. Kaufman. Hearing Examiner FROM: Environmental Review Committee SUBJECT: THE CALLISON PARTNERSHIP, LTD., FILE NO. R-016-86 LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF'SOUTH GRADY WAY AND TALBOT ROAD SOUTH The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has analyzed the information submitted by . the Callison Partnership, Ltd., to rezone 15.44 acres from H-1, Heavy Industrial, to B-1, Business Use, to allow the future construction of "III Renton Place." Based upon the environmental information submitted with the application, the Environmental Review Committee has issued a declaration of non-significance for the rezone only. They have found that the information is insufficient in the areas of storm water drainage, traffic' generation, and on-site recreation to release the environmental declaration for the proposed building. The Environmental Review Committee, therefore, conditions the; declaration of non-significance for the rezone subject to the condition that the rules and regulations governing,.;the_.State__E-nvir.onr»Z- -of--.1981 are still applicable for=< -:- the individual site plan review. The ERC also wishes to inform the Hearing Examiner and the applicant that the City's new site-plan approval process will most probably be applicable to the subject site because the rezone application presently being reviewed could not possibly be completed prior to the anticipated enactment date of the site plan ordinance. Therefore, all parties should be aware that a separate site plan approval will most probably be required. Under Section 4-2822(D), the decision maker must accept these conditions as binding upon his ultimate decision unless he identifies in writing a substantial error in fact or conclusion by the Environmental Review Committee. The decision maker then has the option of asking the Environmental Review Committee for reconsideration for revising the recommended conditions. Fred J. Kaufman April 11. 1986 Page 2 The applicant also has the ability to request reconsideration of these conditions from the ERC or appeal these conditions directly to the Hearing Examiner under authority granted in Section 4-2823(A)(1)(a) within fourteen (14) days of the date that the DNS is final. Therefore, the appeal date would be Monday. April 28, 1986, at 5 p.m. Appeals must be submitted in the form prescribed by both the Environmental Ordinance of the City of Renton and the Hearing Examiner Ordinance, Section 4-3011(B). • RJB:ss 1086N cc: The Callison Partnership, Ltd. Attention: Rick King 1423 Third Avenue Seattle, Washington 98101 The Renton Village Company Attention: Everett Johnson Evergreen Building 15 South Grady Way Renton. Washington 98055 RENTON VILLAGE COMPANY 15 SOUTH GRADY WAY, RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 •(206) 228-3000 CINEMA I,II E.III ONE RENTON PLACE TWO RENTON PLACE SHERATON-RENTON INN EVERGREEN OFFICE BUILDING RENTON VILLAGE SHOPPING CENTER April 11 , 1986 CITY ri-oO� R NTTON rh APR 11 1986 Mr . Roger Blaylock Zoning Administrator City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton , WA 98055 • Re: Rezone R-016-86 Dear Roger : This letter is submitted on behalf of the Renton Village Company. We understand that from the city on March 31 , 1986 , notice of our D.N.S. was published , posted and mailed in accordance with the city' s established procedure, except notice was not mailed to the Renton Village Company as the applicant. The Renton Village Company hereby waives its right to cause any reissuance of the notice . We acknowledge receipt of the notice and will submit any comments on or before April 14th, 1986. - Consequently; -we-- unde•rstand--theor•ig-i-L,_-TA. v=od- and -dead- ---• --r line based on the March 31, 1986 notice shall continue to apply. If this is not correct, please let us know immediately. Very truly our Everett nson Construction Manager EJ:rj ' f 1089N NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE , RENTON. WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a declaration of non-significance for the following projects with additional conditions imposed as mitigating measures under their authority of Section 4-2822(D) of the Renton Municipal Code: THE CALLISON PARTNERSHIP. LTD. (ECF-014-86) , • Application.•to rezone 15.44 acres from H-1 to B-1 to allow future "III Renton Place" office building and zoning compliance with II Renton Place (file • R-016-86): property located at southwest corner of South Grady Way and Talbot Road South. - Further information regarding this action . is available in the Building and Zoning Department; Municipal Building. Renton, Washington. 235-2550. Any appeal of ERC action must be filed with the Renton Hearing Examiner by April 28. 1986. Published: • April 14. 1986 - • • RENTON VILLAGE COMPANY 15 SOUTH GRADY WAY, RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 • (206) 228-3000 CINEMA I,II&III ONE RENTON PLACE TWO RENTON PLACE SHERATON-RENTON INN EVERGREEN OFFICE BUILDING RENTON VILLAGE SHOPPING CENTER April 11, 1986 CITY OF RENTON r 'TO n APR 11 1986 Mr . Roger Blaylock Zoning Administrator r ! j . .I;.+ City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton , WA 98055 Re: Rezone R-016-86 Dear Roger : This letter is submitted on behalf of the Renton Village Company. We understand that from the city on March 31 , 1986 , notice of our D.N.S. was published , posted and mailed in accordance with the city' s established procedure, except notice was not mailed to the Renton Village Company as the applicant. The Renton Village Company hereby waives its right to cause any reissuance of the notice . We acknowledge receipt of the notice and will submit any comments on or before April 14th, 1986. Consequently, we understand the original time period and dead- line based on the March 31 , 1986 notice shall continue to apply. If this is not correct, please let us know immediately. Very truly our , Everett nson Construction Manager EJ:rj OF I 11 ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Z '' RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR p ® MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 o 235-2540 O �P 9�TED SEP1E03 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR April 8, 1986 Mr. Richard King The Callison Partnership, Ltd. 1423 Third Avenue, Suite 300 Seattle, Washington 98101 RE: MEETING OF MARCH 28, 1986 Dear Mr. King: Reviewing the list of items discussed in the minutes prepared for our meeting of March 28th, it was drawn to my attention that the statement, "the City proposes to continue process for rezone and new site plan review process simultaneously" appears the City is processing both a rezone and a site plan for the applicant. This is not the case, and the applicant would need to submit a -site plan application for simultaneous review. It is estimated that if the rezone process goes ahead initially followed by site plan process it would be approximately September before a building permit could be issued. On the other hand if a site plan was processed along with the rezone, it would appear with the approval of both applications a building permit would be issued sometime in July or early August. If you disagree with my understanding of Item #B as discussed, please contact me immediately. Sincerely, Roger-91 g J. Blaylock Zoning Administrator RJB:ss 2334Z The Callison Part" 'ship CITY OF 1 NTC;.i D \J! (ft March 28, 1986 -� . APR 41986 Architecture THREE RENTON PLACE eu��DINcizon!!Nc; DEPT Programming MINUTES OF MEETING Planning Interior Design Project Number 85203 Those Present: Roger Blaylock City of Renton Ron Nelson City of Renton Jim Warjone Renton Village Co. Everett Johnson Renton Village Co. Rick King The Callison Partnership Location: City of Renton - 2:00 P.M. I terns Discussed A. Nelson reviewed status summarizing DNS was granted at meeting. B. City proposes to continue process for rezone and new City Site Plan Review process simultaneously. C. City adoption of Site Plan Review projected to occur within 45 days. (May 9th, 1986) - (April 18th, 1986) D. Nelson confirmed that the City would accept for review building permit materials. E. Can not get through process prior to June 20th. F. Site Plan Review - reviews site plan and interrelationships of development with adjacent developments. G. Prior to City's formalizing position Nelson feels that legal counsel will need to be consulted and review conditions of rezone. H. City expressed that concerns addressed in environmental review need to be dealt with in concrete terms. 1423 Third Avenue Suite 300 Seattle,Washington 98101 (206)623-4646 A Professional Service Corporation / • THREE RENTON PLACE MINUTES OF MEETING Project Number 85203 March 28, 1986 page two - I. Warjone and RVCo. legal counsel to meet with City of Renton legal counsel on zoning ordinance revisions which disallowed use. 94:'C))°4 Richard King, AIA The Callison Partners ip, Ltd. RK:dm/77 cc: Those Present The Callison Par „ership • CITY OF "��arch 28, 1986 11 Il- 'APR 1986 Architecture THRFF RENTON PLACE Programming F.01 DNG/7Om!NI/ IBC=EST. Planning MINUTES OF MEETING Interior Design Project Number 85203 Those Present: Roger Blaylock City of Renton Ron Nelson City of Renton Jim Warjone Renton Village Co. Everett Johnson Renton Village Co. Rick King The Callison Partnership Location: City of Renton - 2:00 P.M. I terns Discussed A. Nelson reviewed status summarizing DNS was granted at meeting. B. City proposes to continue process for rezone and new City Site Plan Review process simultaneously. C. City adoption of Site Plan Review projected to occur within 45 days. (May 9th, 1986) - (April 18th, 1986) D. Nelson confirmed that the City would accept for review building permit materials. E. Can not get through process prior to June 20th. F. Site Plan Review - reviews site plan and interrelationships of development with adjacent developments. G. Prior to City's formalizina position Nelson feels that legal counsel will need to be consulted and review conditions of rezone. H. City expressed that concerns addressed in environmental review need to be dealt with in concrete terms. 1423 Third Avenue Suite 300 Seattle,Washington 99101 (206)623-4646 A Professional Service Corporation f � • THREE RENTON PLACE MINUTES OF MEETING Project Number 85203 March 28, 1986 page two I. Warjone and, RVCo. legal counsel to meet with City of Renton legal counsel on zoning ordinance revisions which disallowed use. • (ir4:44Q Richard King, AIA The Callison Partners ip, Ltd. RK:dm/77 cc: Those Present • • • it The Callison Partnership March 24, 1986 Architecture Mr. Gary Norris Programming • Planning City of Renton Interior Design 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 RE: THREE RENTON PLACE Project Number 85203 • Dear Mr. Norris: We would like to thank you for making yourself available and providing us with some additional advise regarding traffic impacts and analysis associated with our desired development of Three Renton Place. As we discussed, traffic in this area of Renton has become and as development continues is furthering traffic congestion at adjacent intersections to our proposed project. Our understanding from our meeting and our intent is that Renton Village Co. will continue to develop a •Site Specific Traffic Analysis as requested. This analysis will detail means of making improvements in upgrading the existing levels of service to the requested level "D". Based on our data generated and additional evaluation of data base on file at the City of Renton we intend on participating in the required improvements at the level equal to our pro rata share associated with this project. Renton Village Co. has attempted to work with the City closely in developing its projects to benefit all. We hope that this demonstrated participation and our on-going meetings between yourself and Dean Hobson, of CH2MHiI1 our traffic engineers, show our real commitment to meeting these shared concerns. 1423 Third Avenue Suite 300 Seattle,Washington 98101 (206)623-4646 A Professional Service Corporation r � Mr. Gary Norris City of Renton Project Number 85203 March 24, 1986 page two We appreciate your departments' support in our efforts to obtain Environmental Review and Rezone approval for this project. Again, thank you for your assistance in this matter. Y. tru , / -ich•rd King, A A The Callison Partnership, td. RK:mc/79 . cc: City of Renton: Ron Nelson, Roger Blaylock Puget Western: Dick Causey, Wilbur Watson Renton Village Co.: Jim Warjone, Everett Johnson The Callison Partnership: Tony Callison, File ##9 The Callison Partnership CITY O RENTON IR P 'II \II C"4", 'Vii'C , ... ., MAR 2 41986 March 24, 1986 Architecture Mr. Gary Norris Programming Planning City of Renton Interior Design 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 RE: THREE RENTON PLACE Project Number 85203 Dear Mr. Norris: We would like to thank you for making yourself available and providing us with some additional advise regarding traffic impacts and analysis associated with our desired development of Three Renton Place. As we discussed, traffic in this area of Renton has become and as development continues is furthering traffic congestion at adjacent intersections to our proposed project. Our understanding from our meeting and our intent is that Renton Village Co. will continue to develop a Site Specific Traffic Analysis as requested. This analysis will detail means of making improvements in upgrading the existing levels of service to the requested level "D". Based on our data generated and additional evaluation of data base on file at the City of Renton we intend on participating in the required ,improvements at the level equal to our pro rata share associated with this project. Renton Village Co. has attempted to work with the City closely in developing its projects to benefit all. We hope that this demonstrated participation and our on-going meetings between yourself and Dean Hobson, of CH2MHill our traffic engineers, show our real commitment to meeting these shared concerns. 1423 Third Avenue Suite 300 Seattle,Washington 98101 (206)623-4646 A Professional Service Corporation Mr. Gary Norris City of Renton Project Number 85203 March 24, 1986 page two We appreciate your departments' support in our efforts to obtain Environmental Review and Rezone approval for this project. Again, thank you for your assistance in this matter. Y• tru , i ichard King, A A The Callison Partnership, td. RK:mc/79 cc: City of Renton: Ron Nelson, Roger Blaylock Puget Western: Dick Causey, Wilbur Watson Renton Village Co.: Jim Warjone, Everett Johnson The Callison Partnership: Tony Callison, File #9 ri , RENTON VILLAGE COMPANY . 830 LOGAN BUILDING SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 624-5810 RENTON uf3 , , 1 , , E March 20, 1986 MAR 2 4 1986 e Mr. Ed Hayduk Parks and Recreation Department City of Renton Municiple Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Wa. 98055 Dear Mr. Hayduk: . We understand that you are requesting that we provide a passive recreation area for our proposed Three Renton Place. We now recognize the requirement to provide recreational amenities on our property and will show them on our building plans when we submit for permits. Thank you very much for pointing out the need for the tenant amenitie•. . You s ve' y truly, 441111%1 JAM ARJONE Joint Venture Manager cc: Roger J. Blaylock RENTON VILLAGE COMPANY 830 LOGAN BUILDING SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 624-5810 CITY OF iic1\110 ) • f I�y7 C� I � . MAR 2 5 1986 March 20, 1986 BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. Mr. Ed Hayduk Parks and Recreation Department City of Renton Municiple Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Wa. 98055 Dear Mr . Hayduk: We understand that you are requesting that we provide a passive recreation area for our proposed Three Renton Place. We now recognize the requirement to provide recreational amenities on our property and will show them on our building plans when we submit for permits. Thank you very much for pointing out the need for the tenant amenities. • Yours very truly, \ i t J' S E. WA:JON j \ r0, \ Joi t Ventu = .nager ?C$.5- uFzuctkaidc- cc: Roger J. Blaylock RENTON VILLAGE COMPANY 830 LOGAN BUILDING SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 624-5810 March 20, 1986 Mr. Ed Hayduk Parks and Recreation Department City of Renton Municiple Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Wa. 98055 Dear Mr. Hayduk: We understand that you are requesting that we provide a passive recreation area for our proposed Three Renton Place. We now recognize the requirement to provide recreational amenities on our property and will show them on our building plans when we submit for permits. Thank you very much for pointing out the need for the tenant amenities. • Yours ve y truly, (-1) (cY-- •�' WARJONE Joint 4- -ture Manager / I cc: Roger J. Blaylock bc: Dick Houghton // Everett Johnson Wilbur Watson -11 I111��� • RENTON VILLAGE COMPANY RECEIVED 15 SOUTH GRADY WAY, RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 •(206) 228-3000 PUBUC WORKS DEPT. CITY OF RENTON CINEMA I,II&III ONE RENTON PLACE TWO RENTON PLACE SHERATON-RENTON INN EVERGREEN OFFICE BUILDING • RENTON VILLAGE SHOPPING CENTER March 18, 1986 Mr . Dick Houghton Director of Public works City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Dear Dick: Thank you very much to responding to our request for additional advice on how respond to the broad request for a drainage proposal for our new Three Renton Place office building. As we discussed when we were with you, Renton Village is prepared to participate in the ultimate solution of the drainage problems, that are resident on our site . We are willing to make a contribution to what is deemed to be in our judgment, a fair share of the cost of putting the large culvert under Interstate 405 in. the Southwestern corner of our property. In our opinion, a formula which addresses our responsibility as a percentage of the total square footage of hard surface in the drainage area or an equivalent system would probably be be the fairest--a system which might be incorporated in your proposed drainage utility. Renton Village has always tried to shoulder its responsibility by providing at its own cost, a significant part of the City' s ultimate build-out of the storm interceptor system. A recent investment of nearly three quarters of a million dollars in the system on the eastern boundary of our property is indicative of our interest in helping the City solve its drainage problems. Prior to doing that work, we did quite a bit of engineering work. Our studies show that the proposed pipe under I-405 if 'sized to handle the 100 year storm' s .flow that could flow on to our property (which includes the water which was diverted off of the 7th Avenue Interceptor on to our property) should be at • D. Houghton 3/18/86 page 2 at least 72 inches in diameter . We certainly appreciate your department' s support in our efforts to obtain a rezone for the sites of Two and Three Renton Place . We hope that the City will proceed soon with its administrative rezone of our area to bring our current usage into compliance . Again , thank you very much for your. assistance . Yours very truly, s E. Warjone Joint Venture Manager JEW: rj 1077N NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a declaration of non-significance for the following project: CONTAINER CORP. OF AMERICA (ECF-019-86) Application to annex approximately 42 acres and to rezone property from G-1 to M-P (file R-021-86); property located on the west side of Monster Road S.W. at the 600-1100 block. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a declaration of non-significance for the following projects with additional conditions imposed as mitigating measures under their authority of Section 4-2822(D) of the Renton Municipal Code: THE CALLISON PARTNERSHIP, LTD. (ECF-014-86) Application to rezone 15.44 acres from H-1 to B-1 to allow future "III Renton Place" office building and zoning compliance with II Renton Place (file R-016-86); property located at southwest corner of South Grady Way and Talbot Road South. Further information regarding this action is available in the Building and Zoning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. Any appeal of ERC action must be filed with the Renton Hearing Examiner by April 14, 1986. Published: March 31, 1986 FORM 115 NOTICE ENVIRONMENTAL , EcL 4 , RATION • • APPLICATION NO. ECF-014-86 CALLISON PARTNERSHIP LTD, PROPOSED ACTION APPI TCATTON TO RF7ONF 15.44 ACRFS FRAM H-1 TO B-1 TO .ALLOW FUTURE "III : RENTON PLACE" OFFICE BIM DING AND 7ONTNG , COMPLIANCE WITH II RENTON PLACE (FILE R-016-86) GENERAL LOCATION AND OR ADDRESS PROPERTY LOCATED AT SOUTHWEST CORNER 'OF SOUTH .GRADY WAY AND TALBOT ROAD SOUTH POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE t E.R.C.3 HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION CIDOES ®ODES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT ❑WILL OWILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 1 S DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MIST BE RECEIVED BY APRIL 14, 1986 AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., APRIL 14, 1986 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION NVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: POLICie DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUARY 26, 1986 COMMENTS DUE: MARCH 6, 1986 ECF - 014 - 86 APPLICATION NO(s). REZONE: R-016-86 PROPONENT: THE CALLISON PARTNERSHIP, INC. PROJECT TITLE: RENTON VILLAGE COMPANY REZONE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 15.44 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM H-1 TO B-1 IN ORDER TO MAKE THE ZONING IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE EXISTING "TWO RENTON PLACE" BUILDING ON THE SITE AND TO ALLOW A NEii 7-STORY BUILDING HAVING LOCATION: 130,000 SQUARE FEET TO BE BUILT ON THE SUBJECT SITE. LOCATED Al THE SOUTHWEST INTERSECTION OF SOUTH GRADY WAY & TAIRDT RnAn c0UTH SITE AREA:_ 15.44 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 13n,nnn SQIJARF FFFT IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services_ xxx • 16) Utilities 4' COMMENTS: 1) Major concern about traffic entering and leaving the area. The two present entrances on Grady Way should be improved. Especially the entrance closest to the Sheraton Inn. needs to be widened and signal needs to be improved. Traffic system in the shopping area can not presently handle the traffic from the one present building, much less the building under construction and then an additional building. 2) Need another entrance to the site off of Grady Way by the Gull station, would suggest right in and right out only entrance. 3) Need another entrance on Talbot road between Grady Way & Renton Village P1 . again it should be right in & right out only. 4) Major concerns about car prowls in the parking lots clL RECOMMENDATION: El DNS MITIGATED DNS EIS REVIEWED BY �TTTLE:��✓/�rr� v' '`%��!? DATE: 3-�e-c FORM #14 REVISED 9/10/85 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: \'"cx,1 (..,--rEveL4p melq DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUARY .26, 1986 COMMENTS DUE: MARCH 6, 1986 ECF - 014 - 86 CITY OF RENTON APPLICATION NO(s). REZONE: R-016-86 EB 2 6 198R PROPONENT: THE CALLISON PARTNERSHIP, INC. POW", PROJECT TITLE: RENTON VILLAGE COMPANY REZONE n Fura_oQMrtT !IC PT BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 15.44 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM H-1 TO B-1 IN ORDER TO MAKE THE ZONING IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE EXISTING "TWO RENTON PLACE" BUILDING ON THE SITE AND TO ALLOW A NEv1 7-STORY BUILDING HAVING • LOCATION: 130,000 SQUARE FEET TO BE BUILT ON THE SUBJECT SITE. LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST INTERSECTION OF SOUTH .GRADY WAY 14 TAtRUT Run SOUTH SITE AREA: 15.44 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 130,000 SQl1ARF FFIT IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants C� 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources v/ 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation Z/ 15) Public Services L/ 16) Utilities L� , COMMENTS: 443 Ar-PAA:‘.e D/4581), A,F5.0-.,e / v t/(461-6^c- c-1.:7 RECOMMENDATION: DNS n MITIGATED DNS EIS REVIEWED BY: VTR 4401/1 TITLE: /k4i 4°IkcHQ4r--- DATE: -3/4/J Sgo _ FORM #14 ` REVISED 9/10/85 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW -cYET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: t3 O IL OIQ\& DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUARY .26, 1986 COMMENTS DUE: MARCH 6, .1986 ECF - 014 - 86 . APPLICATION NO(s). REZONE: R-016-86 PROPONENT: THE CALLISON PARTNERSHIP, INC. PROJECT TITLE: RENTON VILLAGE COMPANY REZONE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 15.44 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM H-1 TO B-1 IN ORDER TO MAKE THE ZONING IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE EXISTING "TWO RENTON PLACE" BUILDING ON THE SITE AND TO ALLOW A NEw 7-STORY BUILDING HAVING LOCATION: 130,000 SQUARE FEET TO BE BUILT ON THE SUBJECT SITE. LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST INTERSECTION OF SOUTH GRADY WAY R TAINT Rom SOUTH SITE AREA: 15.44 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 130,000 SQIIARF FFFT IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT ' IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services_ ��- 16) Utilities _ COMMENTS: RECOMMENDATION: 1 NS rI MITIGATED DNS EIS REVIEWED BY: TITLE: _! DATE: 2- 2 D - . FORM #14 REVISED 9/10/85 'ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW sH ET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: -27,,m(W I R)C DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUARY .26, 1986 COMMENTS DUE: MARCH 6, 1986 ECF - 014 - 86 APPLICATION NO(s). REZONE: R-016-86 PROPONENT: THE CALLISON PARTNERSHIP, INC. PROJECT TITLE: RENTON VILLAGE COMPANY REZONE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 15.44 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM H-1 TO B.1 IN ORDER TO MAKE THE ZONING IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE EXISTING "TWO RENTON PLACE" BUILDING ON THE SITE AND TO ALLOW A NEW 7-STORY BUILDING HAVING LOCATION: 130,000 SQUARE FEET TO BE BUILT ON THE SUBJECT SITE. LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST INTERSECTION OF SOUTH GRADY WAY & TAIRDT ROAn SOUTH SITE AREA: 15.44 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): t3(l,0b0 SQIIARF FFFT , IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water >0‹ 4) Plants 5) Animals ��- 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics J� 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreatio,n , 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities __, ✓\ COMMENTS: RECOMMENDATION: .X DNS I MITIGATED DNS n EIS REVIEWED BY: DJ ury.'0( TITLE: DATE: 3- 7- ( 6 — FORM ##14 REVISED 9/10/85 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: u v(ojee.ki7 DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUARY 26, 1986 COMMENTS DUE: MARCH 6, 1986 ECF - 014 - 86 APPLICATION NO(s). REZONE: R-016-86 PROPONENT: THE CALLISON PARTNERSHIP, INC. PROJECT TITLE: RENTON VILLAGE COMPANY REZONE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 15.44 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM H-1 TO B-1 IN ORDER TO MAKE THE ZONING IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE EXISTING "TWO RENTON PLACE" BUILDING ON THE SITE AND TO ALLOW A NEvi 7-STORY BUILDING HAVING LOCATION: 130,000 SQUARE FEET TO BE BUILT ON THE SUBJECT SITE. LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST INTERSECTION OF SOUTH GRADY WAY & TAIROT RnAn SOUTH SITE AREA: 15.44 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 13n.nnn SQHARF FFFT IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air ✓ 3) Water r/ 4) Plants ✓ 5) Animals +✓ 6) Energy and Natural Resources ✓ 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use ✓ 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation /✓ 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation �✓ 14) Transportation l/ 15) Public Services_ ✓ 16) Utilities COMMENTS: 3-74N _ !ram,�'`'` � �P�t�z�r�-G��� a z _ � 1"-- !^^�1 df�Jerre 2-5/r RECOMMENDATION: 17, DNS MITIGATED DNS EIS REVIEWED BY: 1� TITLE: DATE: ?� �i/ � FORM #14 REVISED 9/10/85 - JVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW $' FT REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: IISAFrif, DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUARY .26, 1986 COMMENTS DUE: MARCH 6, 1986 ECF - 014 - 86 APPLICATION NO(s). REZONE: R-016-86 PROPONENT: THE CALLISON PARTNERSHIP, INC. PROJECT TITLE: RENTON VILLAGE COMPANY REZONE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 15.44 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM H-1 TO B-1 IN ORDER TO MAKE THE ZONING IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE EXISTING "TWO RENTON PLACE" BUILDING ON THE SITE AND TO ALLOW A NEvi 7-STORY BUILDING HAVING LOCATION: 130,000 SQUARE FEET TO BE BUILT ON THE SUBJECT SITE. LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST INTERSECTION OF SOUTH GRADY WAY RI TAIROT ROAn SOUTH SITE AREA: 15.44 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 130,000 SQUARE FFFT IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 1� 2) Air 3) Water [/ 4) Plants 5) Animals Lam/ 6) Energy and Natural Resources l/ 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use L/ 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics [/: 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services_ • - 16) Utilities _ COMMENTS: ICI �z o,r e_ d e , 4 w Y► lam �-r d��� � �� `7-- 1 b 7-f 2,, S, -7/ee S h j IL ®fr") TU14F R , S , v 5 , ►� GV e s �'�a� -awe r� �- 2r-e-,2L-S 71-v b l RECOMMENDATION: DNS MITIGATED DNS EIS REVIEWED BY: TITLE: DATE: C �''---� !/ l - FORM #14 REVISED 9/10/85 4*.3 azta.c�ied. 3. Page 16 of the Traffic Analysis - provide mitigating measure proposals to reduce E4 '"rated intersection to a ' D' level of service. Provide cost estimates for those measures. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: rfr,Ry, 7 AgC-Wisirfoly DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUARY 26, 1986 COMMENTS DUE: MARCH 6, 1986 ECF - 014 - 86 APPLICATION NO(s). REZONE: R-016-86 PROPONENT: THE CALLISON PARTNERSHIP, INC. PROJECT TITLE: RENTON VILLAGE COMPANY REZONE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 15.44 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM H-1 TO B-1 IN ORDER TO MAKE THE ZONING IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE EXISTING "TWO RENTON PLACE" BUILDING ON THE SITE AND TO ALLOW A NEvi 7-STORY BUILDING HAVING ' LOCATION: 130,000 SQUARE FEET TO BE BUILT ON THE SUBJECT SITE. LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST INTERSECTION OF SQUTH GRADY WAY P TAIBOT ROAD SOUTH_ SITE AREA: 15.44 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 130.000 SQIIARF FFFT IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services • 16) Utilities COMMENTS: ProF01-ed 011, 1112, )Z7 -e m l oy . a-2fc_QQ c am l r e rWct,- wU rim r-� � A I c c u shoukrz ovc cQe� sores --}-y I eccb UY11 q9Fu r4uivt(=t0.v \at- 0,,40,0i- hA/1 cut-ea, bet6)(eAL61-Q P ) tor, m I v 0o�6 clA 4612/_ y - 60i uivi-\ ,h vs-ccauLuy\s cis an -0q CA 4Y'J ?WC `s- M . RECOMMENDATION: DNS MITIGATED DNS EIS REVIEWED BY: TITLE: l( DATE: JiQj FORM #14 REVISED 9/10/85 ' NVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHFET • REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: F I &E Iv: EVENTIntil flAKIEA4.4 DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUARY 26, 1986 COMMENTS DUE: ,ARCH 6, 1986 ECF - O14 - 86 -- APPLICATION NO(s). REZONE: R-016-86 PROPONENT: THE CALLISON PARTNERSHIP, INC. PROJECT TITLE: RENTON VILLAGE COMPANY REZONE 1FE B 2 O 47^, BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 15.44 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM H-1 TO B-1 IN ORDER TO MAKE THE ZONING IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE EXISTING "TWO RENTON PLACE" BUILDING ON THE SITE AND TO ALLOW A NEw 7-STORY BUILDING HAVING LOCATION: 130,000 SQUARE FEET TO BE BUILT ON THE SUBJECT SITE. LOCATED Al THE SOUTHWEST INTERSECTION OF SOUTH GRADY WAY F TAIBDT RnAn SOUTH SITE AREA: 15.44 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross) : 13n,nnn sQUARF FFFT IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services_ _ 16) Utilities ✓ COMMENTS: RECOMMENDATION: MITIGATED DNS EIS REVIEWED BY: /c/,,, /� " .rJ TITLE: /.4:240.E_ / 6 es ve DATE: ,' A'. vZC /9k_S FORM #14 REVISED 9/10/85 :NVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW -7ET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: V T I L t I DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUARY 26, 1986 COMMENTS DUE: MARCH 6, 1986 ECF - 014 - 86 APPLICATION NO(s). REZONE: R-016-86 PROPONENT: THE CALLISON PARTNERSHIP, INC. PROJECT TITLE: RENTON VILLAGE COMPANY REZONE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 15.44 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM H-1 TO B-1 IN ORDER TO MAKE THE ZONING IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE EXISTING "TWO RENTON PLACE" BUILDING ON THE SITE AND TO ALLOW A NEv1 7-STORY BUILDING HAVING LOCATION: 130,000 SQUARE FEET TO BE BUILT ON THE SUBJECT SITE. LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST INTERSECTION OF SOUTH GRADY WAY R TAIROT ROAD SOUTH SITE AREA: 15.44 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 130,000 SQUARF FFIT IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services_ 16) Utilities COMMENTS: RECOMMENDATION: DNS MITIGATED DNS EIS f2L REVIEWED BY: yI TITLE: ar/4/27Y/ ZS/ iNVERP _ Y DATE: 41:?//( ®® 40 FORM #14 REVISED 9/10/85 ,f 1 Mary Ryan .a= real estate 645 shattuck ave. so., renton, wa. 98055 271-5311 March 11, 1986 Environmental Review Committee % Roger Blaylock City of Renton Planning Department 200 Mill Ave South Renton, WAsh 98055 Dear Committee, I read in the Valley paper Three Renton Place is in th.e planning stages. I am writing you to encourage you to please consider the implications of the issuance 'of another building permit for an office building on the already strained surface water drainage system and the traffic system. The traffic is of concern to me because many drivers are by- passing Rainier and using South 7th. It may be necessary to install a light at the intersection of South 7th Street and Shattuck Ave. Has a traffic study been done to determine the pressure the new buildings are going to have on this intersection? Is there a current actual traffic count on South 7th or is it estimated? The traffic at my intersection is already using the courtesy system at the peak hours of 6:30 AM to 7:30 AM to allow someone traveling east on South 7th to turn north on Shattuck. A red light at Rainier already stacks traffic to Moses Lane and sometimes to Morris Avenue. Two building permits have already been issued and now you are contemplating a third large office buildings. Of most concern to me is the surface water drainage. I don't know if there is anything you could do to please me about this issue other than the city and/or the developers to actually buy my nondeductable flood insurance and then have a city employee or the developer 's maintenance staff stand by my storm drains any time it rains for more than six hours straight keeping the debris and beauty bark from clogging the drains to stall the flooding till the last possible moment and to have this same maintenance crew standing by to row me back and forth to my car. And then once the water subsides for them to spend the next few days of their lives cleaning up after the mess. I think I experienced $10, 000 worth of damage during the January 18, 1986 record rainfall. The told me after the record rainfall of the winter of 1981 it was a once every hundred year occurance. CITY OF RENTON EE )i MAR 121986 BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. January 18, 1986 was 95 years early. I had seven inches of water in 1981 . I had 13 inches of water this time. Mrs. Schwartzenberger had water in the living area of her units. She had layed new carpet two weeks previously. I finished laying new carpet Friday night January 17th. Dr. Donnelly, Jack Coble, Mr and Mrs. Troy Hutchinson went to sleep that night with the water less than an inch from our main floors. Troy Hutchinson had water in his entry. Mrs. Schwartzenberger had a good nights sleep. She was in Oregon. Which leads me to another issue. We can not leave town without worrying about the storm sewer backing up on us. I had a lawyer over to my property the morning of January 20th to survey my damage and to advise me if he thought the city was responsible and liable for the damage. He said the city was the responsible party that granted the building permits for the new development which is causing this flooding. The first flood occured after the Park and Ride was built. The reserve flow capacity system of the Park and Ride lot was explained to me. I don ' t know the course of the surface water drainage system but when Renton Village has water, I have water. I know those systems are connected. January 20th I called the planning department and complained about the beauty bark from the park and ride and the new automobile dealerships clogging the storm drains. I was told the beauty bark was not the culprit, the storm drains were overloaded. I am not convinced the city departments are communicating properly about this surface water issue. Sunday January 19th I went up to the city shops and was told the crews were busy cleaning beauty bark out of the storm drains in other areas and would get to me. They never came. The night of the 19th, I pleaded with the police department to close off South 7th and Shattuck Avenue. They never came. The top three inches of water was created by waves from cars playing in the water. The surface water drainage system is critical in Renton Village/Shattuck Ave. No further development can be allowed without addressing the surface water problem with solutions that will not compound the problem in any way. Over here on Shattuck Avenue we cannot absorb one extra gallon of water. One more inch of surface water and there will be at least six property owners here who will have water in their living rooms. I am enclosing photos of our intersection after the g t® ated to subside. This is a very serious issue. We t t solutions before you issue more building permit '. MAR 12 1986 '- Yours very truly BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. Mar P Rvan x ¢ ? ,A �i. w..�..�..��" 4 IT_*.,i a ,e-- .,. s. i. [ f:,o-y -y. ., — H• 2 }t 3'y-1 sa',L2 _ 'bl^.taa^e.'; •- ��ro,..�• Frh . '� :; •'fir ',.Flees;,_•,;:?• - • r, 1. •il; _ • ; o S F l • X: a y _ " t' t bJ � Ii'.. a Dri;,11 j i k.tF.'elYiyK.e uA • li ' �' -'`•ttYr-a/// r`i . S.3t_ 'i. -i.11,A . ‘,....k .'"): r'= ' �1 'i t _ ri Iwt `4L• ,._rr a l 1 1 _.-..,1 , �r11 t a., s 13 ' ,:' . ,i,. rt;4',1,10 i ' 1 s �F '9�•.s 7 5 al. • `-,+ - -`:. K^A`•'z$-•vim'•..-%•A,.•r'�'y '�' � ' ice-. -1-.i.__-- _ ,.J ---7 p�lr f7 SZs'r'/� '..y.'711.*: '_ .0 _she y , + ... 17 '. `I-CS k•'?Y 'W' ' �+ TT9o��a�-.+',.7C f C. •`3.'i "'y'� �`�- _ ' S �s .•.K--"4' ... ...... .:`1_'ram_- -�—� • i _"'!n'- . . -- '-`. .MOAN. �� ��,.l.. - \` ill 'I� 1 ;• ' ': ate)... '�lt .. . ,I ,I•.i.. .r�.�:-I a • :, 1ST • i -.. -. � 64 •xv.. _ .., a t om., _ - - _ fir �.-y • _- ,L`. -.4 _ sal, - .fir•,•!4?`- ,- _ _ __ • • 1, • G(/.4 CITY 0 i Rr",k fo ' fr�AR .12 _...! 1986 BUILDt G,ZGtiIIVG ©EI'T. ' OF RSA to BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT - RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR z =my :F t, 0 - MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 co- 0,9gT�D SEP1 _ts0 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR March 14. 1986 Everett Johnson Renton Village Company Evergreen Building 15 South Grady Way Renton, Washington 98055 RE: REZONE R-016-86/THE CALLISON PARTNERSHIP ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION Dear Mr. Johnson: The Environmental Review Committee initially considered the proposed construction of Three Renton Place on Wednesday, March 12, 1986, and determined that some additional information was necessary prior to reaching an environmental decision. The information concerns the issues of (1) adjacent off-site traffic circulation through Renton Village Shopping Center. (2) on-site recreation, (3) and storm water drainage. The traffic study that was presented shows that approximately 30 percent of the p.m. peak hour traffic generated from the site will have to access through the Renton Village Shopping Center to Shattuck Avenue to allow westbound access onto S.W. Grady Way. This represents approximately a 20 percent increase in the existing turning movements at Shattuck Avenue and could create some internal circulation problems on the shopping center site. The shopping center is approximately 20 years old and was not designed for the intensive movement of motor vehicles through the parking areas. Therefore, we need to analyze the circulation plan of the shopping center, how it presently functions, and whether it would have to be modified to meet safety concerns. Onsite recreation is becoming more of an issue with the development of large daytime populations in the City of Renton. In the Green River Valley, developers have been required to provide approximately 80 to 100 square feet of outdoor recreation area per 1,000 square feet of office structure constructed. Environmental Review Committee is concerned that pedestrian/traffic conflicts will occur with people moving from the office buildings to the outdoor public recreation areas north of the subject site during the lunchtime periods. Recreation can be provided in many forms both inside and outside the building. Based upon our conversation of March 13th, you should clearly state what the present situation is concerning internal recreation for One Renton Place and Two Renton Place. The fact that there is a cafeteria within the building suggests a reduction in the movement of people to public outdoor eating areas. Everett Johnson, ERC Information March 14,1986 page 2 Storm water drainage is final major concern. During the last five years, two major storms have created significant flooding not only in the commercial areas, but in some of the adjacent residential areas. Mary Ryan, a nearby property owner, has complained that no new development should occur until the storm water issue is resolved. The City of Renton and the Department of Transportation have come to a conclusion that the drainage underneath I-405 should be increased by adding a 95-inch storm drainage culvert. This would not only allow for the developed of the proposed site, but it would resolve the present flooding problem that happens in the Renton Village Shopping Center. The Environmental Review Committee requests that your firm propose a methodology to implement the construction of the 95 inch storm water culvert or another possible solution to the storm water drainage problem. Please find attached comments from various City departments. The Traffic Engineering Division is still reviewing the traffic analysis prepared by CH2M Hill and we anticipate a response next Wednesday. Your ability to respond quickly and completely to the questions raised will help the Environmental Review Committee reach an early decision in the environmental determination. If you have any further questions, please contact me directly at 235-2550. For the Environmental Review Committee, • Ge&_ Roger J. Blaylock Zoning Administrator RJB;ss 1067N ti Y O (�'TTY OF1 EN C71 FILE NO(S): ' -0 45". No • Goa B'iii�DING �c ZONING DEPARTMEi T ' s: N MASTER APPLICATiON ft, NOTE TO APPLICANT: Since this is a comprehensive application form, only those Items related to your specific type of application(s) are to be completed. (Please print or type. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) APPLICANT 1TYPE OF APPLICATION NAME . The Callison Partnership, Ltd. FEES ® REZONE*(FROM H-1 TO B-1 ADDRESS ) 4' r' 1423 Third Avenue E3 SPECIAL PERMIT* • TEMPORARY PERMIT* CITY ZIP Seattle, Washington 98101 EIL��-�� CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT* TELEPHONE L�•_ SITE PLAN APPROVAL SPECIAL PERMIT FOR GRADE AND FILL (206) 623-4646 No. of Cubic Yards: p' CONTACT PERSON Q VARIANCE*From Section:: NAME * Justification Required • Rick King - The Callison Partnership, Ltc . OTC SUBDIVISIONS: (206) 632-4646 Q SHORT PLAT QSaflG9C >no 0 TENTATIVE PLAT Everett Johnson - Renton Vil.liage Co. Q PRELIMINARY PLAT XgREORROONNIX . FINAL PLAT (206) 228-3000 • LD WAIVER (Justification Required) • OWNER NO. OF LOTS: NAME PLAT NAME: _ Renton Village Company , ADDRESS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: • Everegreen Bldg, 15 South Grady Way . 0 PRELIMINARY CITY ZIP 0 FINAL • Renton, 'Washington 98055 P.U.D. NAME: TELEPHONE (206) 228-3000 0 Residential Q Industrial Commercial D Mixed LOCATION MOBILE.HOME PARKS: PROPERTY ADDRESS S. W. Corner of S. Grady Way & Talbot Rd. S. 0 TENTATIVE CD EXISTING USE PRESENT ZONING PRELIMINARY Vacant Site and Office Bldg, H-1 FINAL PROPOSED USE . PARK NAME: ' Office Building and Associated Parking NUMBER OF SPACES: • Cgi ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE • S940 NO SQ. FT. ACRES '—— �, i,^ AREA.: 672,402 • , 1.5.44 R.� Q-( !�r 11710„ TOTAL FEES , m 1 V� 1 CITY O T ONST; f 'USE ONLY -- ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING 1 1' ``" Vu ('r Wi Og [t1 DATE�SfAA�F9 r�r R ! ?a APPLICATION RECEIVED BY: �� 1986 APPLI T.ION DETERMINED TO BE: '6 IJV GL FEB 20 • Accepted . ED ' Incomplete Notification Sent On By: BU14 DING/ZOJNINC DEPT. (Initials) DATE ROUTED ADDITIONAL MATERIAL RECEIVED BY:' • `� APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: G�..- 2.G- � Q Accepted • Q Incomplete Notification Sent On By: (Initials) ROUTED TO: Cil Building EmDesign Eng; i. Fire 4.g1 Parks 21 Police Policy Dev. Traffic Eng. [21Utilities Legal description of property (if more space Is required, attach a separate sheet). See Attachment #1 • AFFIDAVIT I, Richard D. King, AIA I being duly sworn, declare that I am ®authorized representative to act for the property owner,[]owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS t3 DAY . OF ^ a. _ 19 ��. V NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, RESIDING AT d - (Name,of;Notary Public) (Signature of Owner) moo� .N• (1-^g"ccA. (-^D (1� ,���; C44u Y ill ,( (Addr'ess) VAR..cs ' 44.-Q, ,/, CAM ar)� ( dress) Qsici , (City) (State) (Zip) NOG) )176 4(440. (Telephone) Acceptance of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete application. Plans and other materials required to constitute a complete application are listed in the "Application Procedure." �.,, 41'7n The Callison Pare rrship • 1.5 Col:c P 9C'q?N February 13, 1986 I. 9 ,,� FEB 2 01986 Architecture Mr. Roger Blaylock CIJILrsf(*1Ca/%�' ��'"�9 DEPT. Programming City of Renton Planning Interior Design 200 Mill Street Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Rezone of Property for Two and Three Renton Place. Project Number 85203 Dear Mr. Blaylock: This cover letter is for the Two and Three Renton Place rezone application and briefly outlines circumstances under which this application is made. In the city's information sheets on rezoning of property, you state that the proponent must show why the rezone should be granted. This request for rezone is clearly a change which should be processed expediently by the City of Renton and granted approval for the following reasons: I. Rezone Request is from H-I to B-I. B-I is the zoning which is intended under the city's adopted comprehensive plan. 2. Existing land use is Business and Commercial. • 3. Adjacent land uses are Business and Commercial (retail). 4. In September, 1984, the city revised the H-I Zoning Ordinance to allow only heavy industry. In so doing, the property's only allowed land use is Heavy Industry. This would be inappropriate to all existing land uses in the area and in conflict with both community and city comprehensive planning intents. 5. This property was not rezoned under a City Administrative Rezone process at the time of ordinance revision for reasons which cannot be determined at this time. Knowing that, while the zoning ordinance revision was created, a non compliant use is currently under construction (Two Renton Place) and active building permit through the city, for which Tenant Improvement Permits are required within the next two months. 1423 Third Avenue Suite 300 Seattle,Washington 98101 (206)623-4646 A Professional Service Corporation , ••- Mr. Roger Blaylock City of Renton Project Number 85203 February 13, 1986 page two 6. The Owner of this property has worked with the City of Renton for many years to upgrade city improvements in and around this site. The Owner was working with various agencies of the City of Renton while the ordinance was rewritten to exclude all existing uses and known proposed uses compliant with the City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Zoning. 7. The Owner wishes to pursue the currently under construction Two Renton Place building and its occupancy. Further Renton Village Company wishes to construct Three Renton Place at the earliest possible date. The accompanying application and data have been prepared in accordance with our understanding of City of Renton requirements for processing this Application for Rezone. Attachments have been included to provide your reviewing agencies with as much data as we could anticipate being required. We would request at this time that at the conclusion of this rezone that the City begin an administrative rezone of the remaining Renton Village properties. The Renton Village Company will be pleased to provide the city with any required information to supplement your administrative process. If you should require any additional information, please do not hesitate to call either Everett Johnson, 228-3000; or myself at 623-4646. ' Sincerely, C-4),UMAK6 i Richard King, AIA 1 The Callison Partnership, Ltd. RK:bm/2 10(bm) Attachments: Application for Rezone Environmental Checklist and Attachments �a� f asu Crys 0p gp�'1, f�� n c 1 i a� 1 ` i 5F F EB 2 01986 Op R4,,' ECF: l 4"f © z City of Renton LU: 3, sell ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST � TF0 SEPTEtf �Q Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43,21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for allproposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose • of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impacts. Use of Checklist for Nonproject Proposals: (Please Type or Print Legibly) Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Three Renton Place 2. Name of applicant: Renton Village Company, The Callison Partnership, Ltd. ; Architect 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Renton Village Company The Callison Partnership, Ltd. Evergreen Building, 15 South Grady 1423 Third Avenue, Suite 300 Renton, Washington 98055 Seattle, Washington 98101 206/228-3000 Everett Johnson 206/623-4646 Richard King, AIA t� checklist 4. Date prepared: Vd• February 3, 1986 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Proceed with construction immediately, spring construction start if approved with early 1987 occupancy. COT? OF, a-?LIEA ,...._ F� pry qp }• :...., FEB 2 0 1986 L ATTACHMENT #2 1 a e. Describe thE.' ,.rpose. type, and approximate qu i ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. General grading for parking and drainage approximately:'40_,_000' yards of filling will be required, local pit run type fill and on site 1 material . f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. None foreseen due to relative flat condition of site and extensive storm drainage systems installed previously (see attachment and installation of an approved Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) . g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Lot coverage of impervious materials equals approximately 86%. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: None foreseen, beyond Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Program (TESCP) . 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Automobile traffic by building occupants, minimal emissions occuring before and afterwork hours principally. Electric operated HVAC units producing minimum emissions. .b. Are there any off-site sources of emission? None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: None. foreseen. 3. WATER a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names_ If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. None on site or in immediate vicinity. Prior existing area drainage ditches and culverts all converted to underground culvert, drainage detention systems under previous work, see _attachments. All work City approved and completed in the Fall of 1982. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. NOne. - 3 - 4) Will the prop I require surface water withdraw 'or diversions? Give general description. purpose, and approximately quantities if known. None. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description. purpose, and appaoximately quantities if known. No ground water will be withdrawn or discharged. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals . . .; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. No waste materials will be discharged into ground. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities. if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Surface collection and distribution of storm drainage to existing 72" storm drainage piping. Flow will be into established drainage course through the 405/167th interchange into .Springbrook Creek and then the Green River. 2) Could waste materials enter. ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. None foreseen. - 4 - • d. Proposed me, ,.es to reduce or control surface, `lmd, and runoff water impacts, if ai v: Tie in and use of existing storm drainage controls in place, (see attachments #10 & #5) _ . and providing during construction an approved TESCP. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: o deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other o evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other re. Shrubs la grass o crop or grain o Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other o water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other o other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Majority will be removed and replaced with nursery quality landscaping and irrigation.. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Proposed landscaping and irrigation complete for all unpaved or developed areas, particularly using native plant materials. All planted areas will have ongoing maintenance. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: Hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other none. Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other none. Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other none. b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Not to our knowledge or experience. - 5 - d. Proposed mea.aaes to preserve or enhance wildlife, .. any: Enhancement could be foreseen through establishing more intensive landscape development of site than presently exists, birds nesting areas principally - overall impact will be minimal . 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electric; HVAC and lighting. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No, shadows from project will fall within adjacent parking areas contained within project development area. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this - proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Compliance wtih current Washington State Energy Code requirements. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. None foreseen. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None foreseen. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if N° any: None foreseen. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Largest impact in project area is traffic noise generated by Interstate 405, South Grady Way, and Talbot Road South. - 6 - • ' 2) What types aa:. . :levals of noise would be created t'<,_er associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic. construction. operation. other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Short term construction related o,peratoins and piling,. Long term additional traffic generated by building occupants however, this should be minimized due to Metro Park and Ride station adjacent to project site at northwest. The project will not generate any per- ceptible noise within the area due to high ambient noise levels. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts. if any: None foreseen. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Site Use: Existing site is unused and abandoned power substation and power poles. Adjacent property uses are office buildings, theater, bank, service station, ret-a;l shopping development, and power substation. (See attachment #10.)„ b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so. describe. No. • c. Describe any structures on the site. Power poles servicing substation and main power distribution lines to remain. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? • Footings from demolished power poles and small vacant block building. e. ' What is the current zoning classification of the site? Heavy industry (H-1) (see attached application for rezone to B-1 ) . f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Business District (B-1 ) . g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not applicable. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 131 ,300 sf of office - UBC occupant laod approximately 1267 persons. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? Nane. II k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts. if any: None. - 7 - 1. Proposed me�o..J:es to ensure the proposal is com;,o' ble with existing and projected land uses and plans. if any: Proposal is consistent with both the existing land uses and proposed comprehensive plan uses. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high. middle, or low-income housing. Not applicable. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high. middle, or low-income housing. Not applicable. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Not applicable. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. 91 '-8" to top of parapet, approximately 100'-0" to top of rooftop penthouse. Exterior building materials precast concrete and metal _framed wi ndo s. . ((Se tta.chments - #9 i #5,. & #3) b. whaat�'views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None. ' c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Similar to One and Two Renton Place (see attachments#9) .) ;;t 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Minimal glare mid-day due to window overhanging precast exterior panels. Early morning and late afternoon reflection will be most probably extent will be similar to One Renton Place (see attach- ment b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? To our knowledge based on prior, identical project experiences. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None foreseen. • d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Building design with all windows being recessed 2 feet from building precast panel faces. (See attachments #3, #6, & - 8 - i 2. Recreation • a. What designated and Informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? None. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No recreational uses would be displaced by proposed project. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. None known or foreseen. • b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None known and no evidence of site historic or cultural importance on site. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Public Streets Adjacent: Talbot Road South along project east boundary, no direct access. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximately distance to the nearest transit stop? Directly adjacent along Talbot Road and Park and Ride main transit station is located northwest of • Renton Village project development area. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many .would the project eliminate? 666 parking stalls would be provided with project per City of Renton requirements. No existing parking would be eliminated. (See attachment #4.) d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). Driveway access points are proposed along South Grady Way at project north, and along Talbot Road South. _ 9 - e. Will the projd::/use (or occur in the immediate vi:.,..;ty of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. None will be used. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Refer to attachment '' , page & Traffic Analysis, 2/V1/86, CH2M g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: Encourage use of public transit, carpooling and van pooling by • building occupants. Owner will furnish letter of encouragement to tenant/occupants. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Project will increase area office occupancy, however, impact on all of the above should be minimal when viewed in overall area need for public services. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Fire Protection: Project will be fully sprinklered per current City of Renton requirements. 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currentl available 4 the site: CgMb natural gas, wa er fuse service elephoriej„ sanitary sewe3 sep is sys em, o er. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or • in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. • See Appendix A. C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. , Proponent: *NA4-Q. Name Printed: Richard D. King, A The Callison Partnership, Ltd. • — 10 — The Callison Par rship CON O RENTON D PI \'t17 o' February 13, 1986 i a :. FEB 201986 BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. Architecture Mr. Jim Hanson Programming The City of Renton Planning Interior Design 200 Mill Street Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Submittal of Environmental Checklist and Attachments Three Renton Place Project Number 85203 Dear Mr. Hanson: This cover letter is for the Three Renton Place Environmental Checklist to outline the project submittal data, scope and schedule. Attached herein is the Environmental Checklist for this project and is intended to begin the city and related approval processes so that this project can commence construction at the earliest possible date. Attachments included with the Checklist have been provided at this time so that we could provide your reviewers with as much data as we could anticipate being required. The scope of the project submittal for your review is the construction of a seven story concrete frame 130,000 square feet office building, associated parking, site development, and related utility extensions, improvements and upgrades. The described utility improvements have been listed herein due to our preliminary meetings and requests made by the City on January 30, 1986. The clearest definition of project scope can be seen in One and Two Renton Place on the adjacent site completed in 1980 and currently under construction. Attachments included with this Environmental Checklist are supplemental material and reports that aid in defining the project related site conditions and impacts foreseen. Technical data requested on the checklist are included as follows: legal description, topographic survey and site plan. Reports and analysis data requested include; traffic analysis, on immediately adjacent and vicinity roadways; soils report, and two soils reports prepared in conjunction with the storm drainage piping installed on the site in 1982. 1423 Third Avenue Suite 300 Seattle,Washington 98101 (206)623-4646 A Professional Service Corporation Mr. Jim Hanson Submittal of Environmental Checklist and Attachments Three Renton Place Project Number 85203 February 13, 1986 In addition to the above information we have included the following data to further clarify and define the project: prior City of Renton Declarification of Non-Significance, December 29, 1978 which included this development along with proposed overall development of the Renton Village site; Building Rendering, First Floor Plan and Building Section which are presented herein to aid in understanding the the building construction, scale and detail; project color rendering for the Three Renton Place to provide additional detail familiarity of the project. It is our hope that this Environmental Checklist and attachments will adequately define the proposed project and its potential impacts so that your agency may review the project completely at this time. If on review of submitted data you have any questions or feel that you would like additional information, please do not hesitate to call either Everett Johnson, Renton Village Company (228-3000) or myself at 623-4646. We look forward to working with you on this project and hope that it meets with your approval. 'ncerel , ic)\ Richard King, AlA The Callison Partnership, Ltd. RKl:dm/I29 cc: Those Present Renton Village Company: Everett Johnson, Jim Warjone Puget Power: Wilbur Watson, Dick Causey The Callison Partnership: Tony Callison, File Rezone Application List of Attachments i I Property legal description (attachment #I, Environmental Checklist) Environmental Checklist and attachments #3 King County Assessor Map #4 Site Survey (attachment #10, Environmental Checklist) #5 Reduced Site Survey #6 Site Development Plan, (Two and Three Renton Place Site Plan) #7 Title Company Certification of Legal Owner, Title Report For further attachments see the Environmental Checklist and List of Attachments thereto. CITY OF RENTON Ve'J VEB 2 01986 -v_. BU{LplN'G/ ONiNQ PEPT. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST LIST OF ATTACHMENTS #I Property legal description. #2 City of Renton, Declaration of Non Significance - Renton Village Properties, dated 12/29/78 #B175. ##3 Three Renton Place, Rendering. #4 Three Renton Place, Site Plan, dated January 26, 1986. #5 Three Renton Place, First Floor Plan. #6 Three Renton Place, Building Section, drawing Sheet A-I3. #7 Report of Supplemental Soils Investigation, Proposed Storm Drainage, 5/19/82 - Prepared by Geo Engineers. #8 Report of Supplemental Geotechnical Engineering Services, Storm Drain at Puget Power Substation 7/16/82 - Prepared by Geo Engineers. #9 Color Rendering of Three Renton Place. 1/I0 Site survey for Three Renton Place, Renton village Company, Renton, Washington, February 1986 - Prepared by CH M Hill. #I 1 Three Renton Place Office Building, Traffic Analysis February 1986 - Prepared by CH`M Hill. #12 Geotechnical Investigation, February 1986 - Prepared by Geo Engineers. #13 City of Renton, Determination of Non-Significance - Two Renton Place dated, May 15, 1985. COW OF RENT eiN9 - -1 FEB 2 61986 BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. APPENDIX A Item A-8 The following studies and reports have been prepared which relate to this site and/or proposal. Attachment 2 City of Renton, Declaration of Non Significance, Renton Village Properties, dated December 19, 1978, B 175. Attachment 7 Report of Supplemental Soils Investigation, Proposed Storm Drainage, May 19, 1982, prepared by Geo Engineers. Attachment 8 Report of Supplemental Geotechnical Engineering Services, Storm Drain at Puget Power Substation July 16, 1982, prepared by Geo Engineers. Attachment 11 Three Renton Place Office Building, Traffic Analysis, prepared by CH2M Hill. Attachment 12 GeotechnicaI Investigation, February, 1986, prepared by Geo Engineers. Attachment 13 City of Renton, Determination of Non Significance, Two Renton Place, dated May 15, 1985. Item B-I 6 (b) Connection to existing storm drainage system installed in 1982. Connection to existing water main with installation of water loop for fire protection. Connection to existing sanitary sewer, connection to existing electricity and telephone utilities. General construction activities on the site will include connections to utilities as described above (see attachments //I0 and #/4). CITY OP RED TON nj LIR< 1.0 FEB 201986 BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. ,g - - �� tee s V-0 Al 1 �c-+6 u; 'Cro vv la a c,6-rie+— j_ L— t Per t)i,r © F EXHIBIT A • That portion of Block 2, Walsworth 's First Addition to Renton, as recorded in Volurre 6 of Plats, pane 23, records of King County, Washington, TOGETHER WITH vacated Dora Street and vacated 8th Avenue adjoining, as vacated under Ordinances 1067 and 2850, respectively, of the City of Renton; and that portion of the Northeast quarter of the Northeast quarter and the Southeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 19, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington, lying Southof the southerly margin of Grady Way (also known as Secondary State Highway No. I-L) , being 100 feet in width as ' presently established; lying North of the northerly margin of South Renton ul • Village Place (also known as Service Road) , as conveyed to the City of Renton If) by deed recorded under King County recording number 5475310; and lying West' 0 of the westerly .margin of Talbot Road (also known as Burnett Road Extension) , r- as conveyed to the State of Washington by deed recorded under King County OD Recording Number 5754046, and State Road No. 515, as condemned by decree entered 0 in King County Superior Court Cause No. 761065; oo EXCEPT that portion thereof lying West of the following described line: Commencing at the Southeast corner of the Northwest quarter of said Northeast quarter; thence southerly along the West line of the Southeast quarter of the Northeast quarter a distance of 190 feet to the northerly margin of South Renton Village Place (also known as Service Road); thence easterly along the northerly margin of said South Renton Village Place a distance of 402.42 feet to the True Point of Beginning of the line herein described; thence North 1 °04' 08" •East a distance of 839.92 feet, more or less , to the southerly margin of Grady Way, and the terminus of said line. Y: '-7-.!':- FECO KE,INSU?AN COMPANY'-;j -�ATE OF: t_ „A„ ` bnveya is c 1`, i . ,. f a8ho�tas1 o~-` °¢`:,;-Tax- 's • _ •_ f2EVENUE—;• •E?a.1103 ,1�' f•' 11•ll:'•1C•I ,,11-71]'iii.11.:_jl.1i.ji:_ti,:_1a.;L�-'� . 1!._' -SAFECO TIn. INS1t ii AkNCE tip f PJ tY�;•I,. ; !!.,. • ;1" ' _=To .STATFflf; :,.i .sa7Di,tonveyance -- .'. _ t l�< ti tom^ __ i; !1 ! a.J..si� :;z_ _ t -I ' -REVEh1U�!--i �--;R8:T1U31� i i_ ; - 1:-j: 1 !lTELL"iTii,li."1('I3 +...;';t :1 i'i ,.,,.... -.. • ,.- ! ATTACHMENT_ # 1f ,;. , r STEWART TITLE COMPANY a l 07 E!a GN" OF WASHINGTON, INC. ) 5, { 801 Second Avenue DI Norton Building, Suite 600 FEB FEB 2 0 1986 Seattle, Washington 98104 Senior Title Officer, Marilyn Sanden Title Officer, Bob Curtis "i°`'�''"'J''-"'""' • ' Unit No. 2 343-1345 Renton Village Company Order No. 28216 830 Logan Building, 5th Floor CERTIFICATE FOR Seattle, Washington FILING PROPOSED PLAT Attention: Barry Sheppard PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE A GENTLEMEN: In the matter of the plat submitted for your approval, this Company has examined the records of the County Auditor and County Clerk of King County, Washington, and the records of the Clerk of the United States Courts holding terms in said County, and from such examination hereby certified that the title to the following described land: As on Schedule A, page 2, attached. VESTED IN: RENTON VILLAGE COMPANY, a Washington general partnership EXCEPTIONS: As on Schedule B, attached hereto. CHARGE: $100. 00 TAX: 7. 90 TOTAL CHARGE: $107.90 RECORDS EXAMINED TO: February 10, 1986 at 8: 00 a.m. STEWART TITLE COMPANY OF--WASHINGTON, INC, Marilyn Sanden Senior Title Officer Unit No. 2 ATTACHMENT # 7 Order No. 28216 PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE A Page 2 In the matter of the plat submitted for your approval, this Company has examined the records of the County Auditor and County Clerk of King County, Washington, and the records of the Clerk of the United States Courts holding terms in said County, and from such examination hereby certified that the title to the following described land: That portion of Block 2, Walsworth' s First Addition to Renton, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 6 of Plats, page 23, in King County, Washington; TOGETHER WITH vacated Dora Street and vacated 8th Avenue adjoining, as vacated under Ordinances 1067 and 2850, respectively, of the city of Renton; and that portion of the northeast quarter of the northeast quarter and the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 19, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington, lying south of the southerly margin of Grady Way (also known as Secondary State Highway No. 1-L) , being 100 feet in width as presently established, lying north of the northerly margin of South Renton Village Place (also known as Service Road) , as conveyed to the city of Renton by Deed recorded under King County Recording Number 5475310; and lying west of the westerly margin of Talbot Road (also known as Burnett Road Extension) , as conveyed to the state of Washington by Deed recorded under King County Recording Number 5754046, and State Road No. 515, as condemned by decree entered in King Ccunty Superior Court Cause Number 761065; EXCEPT that portion thereof lying west of the following described line: Commencing at the southeast corner of the northwest quarter of said northeast quarter; thence southerly along the west line of the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter a distance of 190 feet to the northerly margin of South Renton Village Place (also known as Service Road) ; thence easterly along the northerly margin of said South Renton Village Place a distance of 402. 42 feet to the true point of beginning of the line herein described; thence north 1°04' 08" east a distance of 839. 92 feet, more or less, to the southerly margin of Grady Way, and the terminus of said line. END OF SCHEDULE A STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY PLAT CERTIFICATE Schedule B Order No. 28216 GENERAL EXCEPTIONS: 1. Rights of claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. 2 . Public or private easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public record. 3 . Encroachments, overlaps, boundary line disputes, or other matters which would be disclosed by an accurate survey or inspection of the premises. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records, or Liens under the Workmen' s Compensation Act not shown by the public records. 5 . Any title or rights asserted by anyone including but not limited to persons, corporations, governments or other entities, to tide lands, or lands comprising the shores or bottoms of navigable rivers, lakes, bays, ocean or sound, or lands beyond the line of the harbor lines as established or changed by the United States Government. 6. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water. 7. Any service, installation, connection, maintenance or construction charges for sewer, water, electricity or garbage removal . 8. General taxes not now payable or matters relating to special assessments and special levies, if any, preceding the same becoming a lien. B. SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS: As on Schedule B, page 2, attached. Order No. 28216 PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B Page 2 SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS: 1. CONDEMNATION BY THE STATE OF WASHINGTON OF RIGHT OF ACCESS TO STATE HIGHWAY AND OF LIGHT, VIEW AND AIR, BY DECREE: ENTERED: November 15, 1972 CASE NUMBER: 590383 2 . RESTRICTIONS CONTAINED IN INSTRUMENT: RECORDED: December 10, 1963 RECORDING NUMBER: 5674305 AS FOLLOWS: It is understood and agreed that the grantee shall not place, construct or maintain any building or other structure on the two above described portions of easement as reserved. Grantee shall do no biasing whatsoever within a distance of 300 feet from said lines unless reasonable notice thereof has first been given to grantor in writing. Grantor shall have the right at any and all times to cut, top and/or trim all brush or trees now or hereafter standing or growing upon the two above described portions which in the opinion of the Grantor constitute a danger to its lines or property. 3 . Relinquishment of certain rights granted to the state of Washington by instrument recorded on June 26, 1961 under King County Recording Number 5754046. 4. Right to make necessary slopes for cuts or fills upon property herein described as condemned in King County Superior Court Cause Number 761065. 5. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF, AS HERETO ATTACHED: GRANTEE: City of Renton, a municipal corporation PURPOSE: Water line AREA AFFECTED: Portion of said premises DATED: April 2, 1974 RECORDED: May 29, 1974 RECORDING NUMBER: 7405290484 (continued) Order No. 28216 PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B Page 3 - 6. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: Puget Sound Power & Light Company, a Washington corporation PURPOSE: The right to construct, operate, maintain, repair; replace and enlarge one or more electric transmission. and/or distribution lines AREA AFFECTED: Portion of said premises DATED: August 24, 1982 RECORDED: August 27, 1982 RECORDING NUMBER: 8208270358 7. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: Puget Sound Power & Light Company, a Washington corporation PURPOSE: Right to construct, operate, maintain, repair, replace and enlarge one or more electric transmission and/or distribution lines AREA AFFECTED: Portion of said premises and other property RECORDED: August 27, 1982 RECORDING NUMBER: 8208270359 8. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE:- Puget 'Sound Power & Light Company, a. Washington corporation PURPOSE: Right to construct, operate, maintain, repair, replace and enlarge an underground electric transmission and/or distribution system AREA AFFECTED: Portion of said premises DATED: October 22, 1985 RECORDED: November 4, 1985 RECORDING NUMBER: 8511040582 (continued) k(1 Order No. 28216 PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B Page 4 9. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: Puget Sound Power and Light PURPOSE: construct, operate, maintain, repair, replace and enlarge an electrical distribution substation AREA AFFECTED: Portion of said premises DATED: August 24, 1982 RECORDED: August 27, 1982 RECORDING NUMBER: 8208270360 10. GENERAL TAXES: FIRST HALF DELINQUENT MAY 1; SECOND HALF DELINQUENT NOVEMBER 1: YEAR: 1986 AMOUNT BILLED: $26, 436.99 AMOUNT PAID: $ -0- AMOUNT DUE: $26, 436. 99 TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 192305-9001-07 LEVY CODE: 2110 11. DEED OF TRUST AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTOR: Renton Village Company, a Washington general partnership TRUSTEE: Safeco Title Insurance Company BENEFICIARY: Puget Sound Power & Light, Co. AMOUNT: $3, 600,000.00 DATED: August 24, 1982 RECORDED: August 27, 1982 RECORDING NUMBER: 8208270356 The amount now secured by said Deed of Trust and the terms upon which the same can be discharged or assumed should be ascertained from the holder of the indebtedness secured. 12 . Unrecorded leaseholds, if any; rights of vendors and holders of security interests on personal property installed upon said property and rights of tenants to remove trade fixtures at the expiration of the term. (continued) Order No. 28216 PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B Page 5 13 . Terms and conditions of the partnership agreement for Renton Village Company, a Washington General partnership. NOTE: A copy of the partnership agreement and any amendments must be submitted. 14. Any conveyance or mortgage by Renton Village Company, a Washington general partnership, must be executed by all of the general partners and their respective spouses as of the date of acquisition or evidence submitted that certain designated partners have been authorized to act for the partnership. 15. Matters of record, if any, against the names of the undisclosed general partners of Renton Village Company, a Washington General partnership. END OF SCHEDULE B TM/cc/6296d III _ ,,s..--) STEM.. __ T ['LE COMPANY \ '/ of Washington, Inc. \y 26 2 1 "'' ORDER NO. IMPORTANT:This is not a Plat of Survey. It is furnished as a convenience to locate the land indicated hereon with reference to streets and other land. No liability is assumed by reason of reliance hereon. 4• iu.7._Tw —' . •.. • f• ••-T •• I,.., ?TN i t .��.. �, T ,• , +. •. _ I I i II •'. .!S ....... „' B �. 1 I I. I .•• I:' •. 1 J •• 4. . ' a r ' .. 1 L__ - . ��J -_'', 4" A '. • i .: / 7/ , r.:: AV zr. , III • 4.2 `j` I 1. o4 in • - r • •• a • T _- o ,1 tr\' , .f•. •.•, , a r.a.•,o..• \� 7 'a�' S b;ll• *,t. 4. .11 S P (, L� CO su /- �� I rSMUfFLET• tr.0 sz :S5 Mi•r • I 1 • ' f. - — I I� 1, I ♦ L ; •_ZI • p. -• 2 1 t. I .0 • y I V 'I I \ o ♦ I �' ; A \ I ry I_t `� .. t Z� J w ; i 1 -; Ili k kfl ,• � p - i L'3u�€T-�P. a r co ec•.taLrl i+o I IlO.v. �Ir� I a I ,a', • T • m •I J J i , ,,►•�. Q I • • f`,ate .- T .•^ - �1 "SOUTH PENT 1 —NiTtLA . 'rt.^. I co I r 11r►►' _ -_. _ <.r• •. w<wre" ♦3../..a . a• _ _� •_ '"'"47► l' -... ..... •a$-..-..a veT.a I •.41'••_i.a .-- T' �. i 1 • rSTT°.•‘• FILEiiTE1F� rn r>> j `...l C Mwt 24; , ' .,`. • PROPOSED/FINAL D - ARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE/,r :tN-SIGNIFICANCE zi Application No. ___:& RECEIVEU &i :4 i ''`s_ PROPOSED Declaration Environmental Checklist No, ' - CSIFIN„L Declaration = Description of proposal 7_. ,v 4�,a . _: X .t t 5,�1. s` 4. i-03' tt ' L • ` �.i : w`,• • _ "r'ropone t c .Location of Proposal" . IS- o P4:7Z, .Lead Agency L ` _ This proposal osal has been determined to significant adverse impact upon the environment.have se-` `.'' (� i s not required under i ronment. An° have a made sfnot. review byRCW 43 . 2IC. 030(2) (c • EISTh :� :is _: . ::' the lead agency of a completed �environmentals decision s- .°;1.::;_- checklist and :other information on file with the l Reasons for declaration of environmental si 9 �n • dad agency:-.:.Q f� cance : . • Jii'11 kl {60 �i�,�i i:1 i 1 +'. C"n7 1 • • _ PC[3 2-0 19$6 BUILDING/zoNING DEPT. Measures , if any, that could. be taken to environmental impacts to such an extent thatr environmental itsa declarationimts to preventth leador mitigate the _ - with raw of non- of s the agency would ,. . significance and issue a (proposed/final ) _ .. • O' / 9 .4-- -.4 _ . 1 /. 74 ' -5. .. -- -.: -.. '. - • e. ,e,4....7-5-1.-7.-7,77L /V----es •• ' ' Responsible ' Official P e �� ''1 ''� '- --� fit}e .f/>C/,�I Sfl/(/ Date /2- r Z -- / 7 >ignature . d ------ ATTA 'HMrMr db 6 . LI . ; -• ....,-.:- :-... ., :,;11,. • INTEROFFICE CORRESPONDENCE December '2 ` �• '�'' �.. ... Date 8, 197a'-'' ' ;' • y:r` l s �` tiff TO: Warren :C:.;Gonnasorti • ':�ii':t •s � ; rRC I: Richa-rd•:C•. Houghton - , . - • ;;_= .- a.,-V.: 4 •, ', �. , . `• ",:• . • • �A" " - SUBjECT� ;' 'RentonVillage Drainage Analysis for E.'I::S.. : -f_; "y• ' . • • • • .. • .,�Z`fi::' .;._.:ter-• ��. ., ' • ' i 4 The analysis submitted' by Jones Associates was• a',study of:'::the:;:exi:sting :storiit•,=:_: ;:':: ,drai n Lsystem through.;the Renton Village:Shopping Center and::across;,the;:.South '`4.:•:= • ,;. • Rentorl.,Interchange ::to the •discharge.poin.t west of East"Val leyl,;Road.. • _The: r .�-' ::�: purpose 'of;••their' study was to determine the capaci•ty.:•of :the: system as`: it,:;Home' �--•::'; ' "~- • exists•,-'and to.determine the impact of .the proposed development:-upon :the:: : : :i--, '.. -' :existing: system. ' Their study shows the existing capaci:ty off the.:Sys teni,--to4e • 35 CFSand 'with cleaning and restoration," the original capacity •of "44 CFS;==`:! .`:• could be-reached. We agree with their conclusion that the proposed development would. have.-.a_ .'. �'. . minima 1 ' impact on the "system as i t now exists since the site i s presently', of-;i_.. . ., an impervious nature. - However, we feel ' that the existing;'system is inadequate':, • to handle the existing runoff to the site,. A preliminary study::shows :that .z:. s.1 much as *95-- CFS `.(10 •yr:) 'could occur at the upstream end of-. the system;;:`: See:1-.• . ' attached.) A projected 10 year flow of approximately 130 CFS could occur:_at •-_. • this point. :. ; • We feel that consideration should be given to upgrading the system, to -accomo-•` date the projected run-off, or relieving the system by some. other r' ;ns ','::,, Restoring the existing system to its original, capacity will help but will ::not• - '- significantly relieve the flooding in this. area.'• :.,, ::. .. .• . f,t .. = _RB:pmp ' . b•oV CS • ,..4••. 1..• ' ,,,, '. 1131 I `�_'i� 1 •`w F, Jill �_ • kL "P lip /.J ,�' _ :,IJ' �'to. TJ�; ��'L,r t.'-. ', �., -• • • s 'I'43' i.: •;t.:• .1 n'" "°--� ' •-. �;../- _.:tip s • -� = ram mot °:..n • • • --r_. •. •r` �r �.;y•r�.1 •�-•,tom ,_� .�_••.•..• Ir - `,•'I� - ' ••�•'•C. lii.7":. -;En • ..�;� f o • • •1='!• 1 w�} • ••• • .....� ' 1 ,, r •rw+, ; 'r 1 •- : - ,qVO4:,�p� .4-::ad L' �• 'r• Itl•a /. • r /y viarigh. . 01 41• _ •i . - -I \ �; ! I.. • tv CD '-' -- - - _•,. Tyr•; • .' a� j Q '�� �s ., • .4 r I I I Mall . r•_r•.xa.r�...�si: C�— , V ,._.—•• `• :...a: , .' J. , -l' ••r :1!•:�'•-r; `�1��. 1�_��` ���•1�� -, am = _ _ F �. .. 1._t- , O— ,-aw •• • • �Mi� ' .� �:r r _ is � 71141'om• • 1 �'- .. , � '. r i` 'slalom_MO' + .4 'l, ;'Cj?, t ' • - . y - 7r - - , .':- • l a 't•• ,l 'p, t' ., f /7 , • ii. `•,c' ®� m• ai •••' :` T/• • l• y a. ;. .. •. • ...•1 -; j .TI'.� w4• � �. I. -( �I • • � `,a . 10 I,:i•�:t j•_I .r• f; Ji•;•'r. :fir t y(- '''-`1 ': ia! : r•�• )... F • • '• ✓�^ •'t�"'" • ,,, ,...,-,...• 1'• .:.'� ,• 'r '' •: .;.a •<��'ii ty%• ', t. , . .•, / 1 ., .V ,• ./ •"�s: .r..,--"-ti:..,. • ti/` y '!�� •rlr+-:�'•:.�.._ ` ..,�•�• ,� �'""•'• lG •r;•-" '[''. I• .�l�.r. r�� r��•1.1 M1-"• ,:: \ 25 • • IW v • IQ; ,,,•••fll ,/ a:: • .Y-.::,• • e ;,-.3 'Y •'•7•*. .• •• '• • t. ^% i,4•��•/ a) ..- U▪ \• `i<, / `�t` •' ,- t .t'1: -.f' ♦ :f, •,• ( • _,hey., ' 'i. o •:' • \ S.• •�... :1 1' ,�•• -- /,,• • 4`. .• F...� C7, •.1�o:r.�.n�3'i:�fj • ..fie' .,. Y-'a ;�✓.! (4J�. • ''6j .-'17 C7.T�.• � ��� • 1•' ';-% 1 '/ �'"'•,--f• ••./..:we.3�:!„I.a,...�• �%•' ,s '�Lj ? •i :•��) a ` ' • 'i' U. .a •i.''./ �••, ,J X D / 1' ?' •'1 •l r� 'I • ,�: :• .}'.• 1�'�''`-• •- ,,: ry t`p •�,.`cry /.�: I �yy.1'�.:'•' }'VI!' 1�ar�'•''••e.' r y' a•{,.• .1. L'i, \•::, - /• �C+J [ ,J•f i :If: • ''��( ) •`� '•��• II'• i•%'71.,r :!• yl...' '• is a i ij '.•••11'''•. E/ ':'. /••• C � •• • \-' f - :r _i11 / i.. `,`, ✓ �� a Ri, - +rr xSi:w-r' 4• rat,••..,-� ``-• Cin• 'a�%�.•,y' • ?.7�: :. • \ /' \"�q `' ..5. 1.1 tr ^te �V • i - ,� y�i..,.,.,•..j:ves ,• j♦ •�.�'i.:-..:''I;-t.,.•, i rr,\ ,..!:JI•' •��.e� is i 1) •'1 t \ • . , — \ Lf --• ! , { ,, , �;: ,•, �: Yri �. it �:rj.l ::,,F y, ., 4 • • l '`� � ,• •' \ ! li r t,J,:r•.n•t.,.,..1,.n„f.1 f'`r'.�' „.:,'. : n 1,:4,r. . y 4• ''� r / . `444/I • • S ,1 ' �� '� ) ,'ITS • ~ !�• ,•• , if\':. I i•�' �,f t',�• 1 • •$ 1 • .,r V., i ••,_ C N• .��u•f ii fri j; h� '' ▪,• , :%:.... ,✓ >: . ' 1 r' :.i-�.:-.. <ae;.. �, +• , (•r,�1. i' C! a p J.' � ` yy ,.. rat.......• ♦ ' S :.: e. •!'? • . I}y •;,_ o "1r111 ''' 11' •Y._ • 11 7ti. I ewl� • _ •• ... _ J 1 K L ::.c...l .=!, 7r:�iurr :*::;� y,� r. •f;- r�. :, Yr. , -:J`-' , , f i j� � r, 11 -\ '�-��..._J/'• -_.:I 1.••iwr.......... • • • •:; ,;.:i v;..4.; ••1.r.. ,.�.i.' '•� ;. u!\•, ./- ',.t� _ a. •%;.( �• G n 4; i+ .. �••1 -- w• . 'tir':yir`[\,"i�:',}� y, ,; ••d ay:n_:..i� iC...P'!�,�Ir��•,. - •l- • u�1' '.l. (,' 4 ::+�' .„a•'•C[,"r� � •�� 4 c' ^ - � '; • •� ��. Y • ` . •• {{• y, .4:..:.:r r•�.�.;:I r�� .••. .•}; i .. 1 ( J-. ., ' 1•I, i .' %' •. , -�,•,,,,,..r,{,;.-fir' y1•,s•i'.:�A • f':j: .8.:. .8 .Pa ✓ • ••� .�-!1e1 -.• • 't •'�/•),.!:' '! 1}•11:' /� �:,•,I�.•'F.':•.f�'�,�t. ,ef Nr�: :i�•►e�c61! r,/.��( �/„� .(� :•. ,•%•! `/' • ` i )o •f,/': - '`t . •,.. • ..1 ••_ '7;u nril�,, r.%eYfl f?�.''.:M1:.••1.�QQ��(�..!':'• •,. •.'t.• :1' •s• \' • i +.!•iff• / • Yva:�.9 '...)t • ♦ • ., • `o E" .. i,1#• �.c�;�'4y/; ;•r�.ya,..rj.. ^ y_.:... � .,d,;e!' { ,C1�•• �. 'N...r.`K•:��%J .,•.;t 11! •.t \� +_. -��'! ':�'i;;����':2:�e�;1, . .J'' e;. ?I �.,•y�f•:i\, 4: ,/.� ,,.i. i'' ':.�:4._..•)' `i%S�, "#V:l,�• ✓`•'\•-'••.`'• • r' .._1 n• �-. •(•',;,-+..... ` •,• :'i.:r: a! /r :�ti 1 .r•11(1 r �•;^�.�,.��%:�::. ,•�i�*'.�'1 tkAT�. .�"}� i': � j w ti.• t'% �4.�'� • t�r' '''�• S.Swt13:•`;; • ��/••,1. ....1.�• ;f`.-,^,� .,:,.:::s: 't ..j.. �. _ • �::.- r•., ;��"'• �; ,_,.. • j ='Z(-•1� 3 • • •p� ,7i t !/!:fy :n;:r4'.'•:• ::^ .Z :'.'a' ./ 1 �,?j .• r.r ti ati %`•• t' �) • G` '.1• -•.,m,.Y• t-, •'i f A 'vl,,•. ,,,• Y. .`'.•• ..0 J/♦:i' '4 • • .i.{/'' . • _(•' . .f •',.*. {4:'•. /f'• • • �. :A': ,'it. .�~ •' 'vl:')e•• K••. �, 8,7• lti,•:'C41 '1'< ` ..i. "5 •t .t!. .., ... e..iiVwwwiiiiii...••••, • f ;.. ! .•t•.;{...:•r' .t,•`,-774• t,..4�'" ,0,.,, -•...„,..:y,lf 1 �•,,,i4 •✓). i+/J!: 1 .•r, , •�!i')'f1 •.• �J1 r� '.j / ''1,"'/. • •!': .. , ' f';� Y; 7 •yllr,J{��"I 'f tr Y. ( ,(Q(��.Q'�• hl•,! �..-_„1=. , • �1 _ _ •y ,1' 1 1 y..• , •11 Ni • .�• •• • 'tr ii� l is• �M r •Y'\ ,l 74Z•'{ } • S it r ^.� „ . 1`( t,n.,ja <• aj,y• tY•t�.:••.. —,t•,•„` r7p 4 ��;•S �lI i1.. ! � /:rf... .I.r•�'- �� � 1•. 14 ,, . • .,•...•• J ;',aa.•• • J. y,•.,•. ...,t�• f ',..• a: 7 \ •„ )[. ,. ;err,. .' -444 : �•' t', •'4::1,.r�7•i .. Lzx'C 1 ►:;4 '�• • 'Y�•.•'r• I � a/ .f ;. t, ,•��1�Ar • : �� • ' •,._.✓ .1.J l!.I;�,:,J,11Z. - •,•,• • 'I. ! .!•l.` "A' ,'�I'Nitl. 44..a • rl:,.):,,�� - `} •�, r\11fF•F •}!• •\e' 1 / `'` . r ',i':?•• •trl:•f � ,•� „'l J,,,•••,.1 i��'°• •✓• •'+�,••11 /'^`a.. •r1 1%-..•••y ✓%' 7 ► 1p y 1 �. .�I.• 4,;'L, 5 ' •�'i „T.•IJ' •p„ ,•• Jr; ,•'�,i ,;.,, • ..: �..;' •�'. ...., •' %�' ,-'_ '4• I• 7;•. . ,,;.'''r''•i "14112Zedf l \I••� '�. t.' ,1.4h,c.1':" a \� ' . 1; , ,4r yy,,i: r , •• .•a wi -•"fir.. .r • . �:1• 1 1. •� •r e7• ., • • )� • 1 r; 1 LL J�• • ". cr.. ,/,.'t,.ltl: ••y• .,.D',• .'1 �:! .. '1,•IC.r' .++i`,.•\:. .P'.:. ."r.'� .t •�, .� rVtd1S!li 't••.t..t..1 \1 . ... '1. .1.• I 1" • ASSOCIATES. INC_ CONSUL r/NG December 8, 1978 ENG/NEERS Warren C. Gonnason, Director. • • Department of Public Works ' - City of Renton Renton, Washington - + • Dear Mr. Gonnason: Thank you for reviewing the City of Renton staff with us regarding a proposed expansion of Renton Village Shoppingts and concerns At that time, you identified three topics of concern thatyour sf Center. felt needed additional analysis and clarification. staff members . y This letter supplements • and amends the Environmental Checklist submitted to the CityBuilding Department, August 22, 1978, and provides further inf ro Renton, the three topics — storm drainage, traffic and airpollution. information•on • " review, we have conducted extensive environmental and i Since your Checklist tions of these issues for Renton Village Co. engineering inve:;iga- . are the subject of this letter. g The findings of these studies Storm Drainage. Runoff and storm drainage channeled Village site derives from two drainage basins, one a through the Renton site. The present capacity of this total drainage `-h south and east of the second (cfs). The system as designed and constructed has a35 cubic feet per of 44 cfs. Siltation subsequent to installation of the system hydraulic capacity stream of Renton Village accounts for present flow reductions.in sections down- maintenance of the on-site portion of the system would result in Improved only an insignifi- cant 1 cfs increase in this capacity. However, in regard to the o the culvert running under State Highway only site system, • and debris that restrict drainage flow. Proper cleaninghas become clogged with sediment and of this portion of the drainage system would permit flow at the original maintenance design capacity. Maintenance of the n design I-405 right-of-way is the responsibility fof ithe he system in the State Highway Washington State Department of Transportation. 2700 NORTHUP WAY 4 BELLEVUE,WA 33004 4 ;?03) 827-9555 + - f4 ' r , r Traffic. Renton Village S Shopping Center is bounded by south, the East Valley Freeway Interstate 405 to theGrad Way (SR-i67)/Rainier Avenue S. to VI:: west, S. Y y to the north and Talbot Road S. to the east.to both S. Grady Way and Talbot Road S. It has direct access Traffic volumes in the vicinity of the site are great • of S. Grady Way and the East ValleyFreewa greatest at the intersection - intersection, 1978 traffic counts show daily voR For this .meter Avenue S. : •• _ s on S. 11,000 vehicles eastbound and Grady Way of nearly • approximately 10,900 westbound. However; • in front of Renton Village,g , eastbound traffic on S. Grady Way drops to some 6,400 vehicles per day. Along Talbot Road S. adjacent to Renton • average daily traffic volumes are some 5,700 vehicles southb Village, northbound. Peak-hour demand was derived from machineounsd and 7,e0 by the City of Renton. The morning and evening peaks rangedro providedt11 percent of the average daily directional traffic flow. The amount from 5 to 11 • presently generated by facilities at Renton Villageis.ind' of traffic • . Estimated Traffic Generation, 1978. rcated in Table A, Estimates of trip generation for the proposed Renton Village ion at the "horizon year" (the year when the entire facility is completed aSd c are shown in Table B, and occupied Estimated Traffic Generation, Horizon Year. For con- venience, additional "horizon year" generation has been shown se parately. It can be seen that adverse traffic impacts associated with the sion at the horizon year will be primarily associated with peak-hour con e ton- The intersection of S. Grady Way and the East Valley Freeway/Rainier additionalaYi Rau coninier ,vengestiue on. • S. will be most impacted by traffic. However, the service rating of this intersection is not likely to change. The existing p.m. peak-hour directional flow is 1,268 trips. P h„ur peak P At the horizon year, the peak-hour flow at the same point is estimated at approximately congestion impacts are expected to be insignificant, trips. As sociated ssociated non- traffic volumes might g rcant, except that these higher traffic result in a slight increase in the number of low-speed non-injury accidents at this intersection. • • •-1/it t,-t`2, cy c --, --- TABLE A RENTON VILLAGE ESTIMATED TRAFFIC GENERATION 1978 Traffic b Generation A.M. P.M. Facility Existing (ADT) Peak Peak . Hotel 185 rooms 1,943 . - 159 ' . 135 Offices 78,000* 912 184 184 Retail 101,000* 3,483 . 64 266 - • . Theater 1,500 seats 900 *** - *** Bank ** 310 . *** *** Service ** 1,496. 42 50 ' Stations 9,044 . 449 635 * Gross square feet ** Existing facilities *** Not applicable in peak hour Source: Jones Associates, Inc. ; ' • Institute of Transpor- tation Engineers (1976) Traffic Generation TABLE B. ` RENTON VILLAGE • • TRAFFIC GENERATION, HORIZON YEAR . Traffic Proposed Generation A.M. P.M. Facility Expansion (ADT) Peak Peak ' Hotel 150 rooms 1,575 126 110 Offices 600,000* 7,014 1,403 1,403 - Retail 450,000* 15,517 465 1,552 Restaurant 8,000* • 450 9 28 Theater 1,500 seats 900 -- -- 25,456 2,003 3,093 * Gross square feet 5 Source: Jones Associates, Inc. ; - . Institute of Transpor- tation Engineers (1976) . Traffic Generation Measures that may be used to mitigate traffic impacts include: Revising signalization at access points from Renton Village to S. Grady Way and Talbot Road S. • Encouraging use of public,transit by adding bus stops on S. Grady • Way or within the Renton Village-site. . • Using dual left-turn lanes at entrances to Renton Village, to allow a decrease in signalized "green time" for turning. • Using two-phase traffic signals, coordinated for simultaneous operation, as a means of enhancing signal progression. Using on-site channelized right-turn pockets to improve the traffic- merge pattern from Renton Village to S. Grady Way and Talbot • Road S. Air Quality. Existing concentration levels of carbon monoxide were measured by the Washington State Department of Transportation along Benson Road south of the site, and at the Puget Power Division Yard east of the intersection of Talbot Road S. and S. Grady Way. In no instance did the readings exceed the national, state of regional standards for ambient air quality. The highest 1977 concentration in relation to the standards at the Puget Power Division Yard was the March-April eight-hour level of 3.3 ppm, compared :o the 9.0 ppm ambient air quality standard. This level of concentration is most likely • a result of the more stable meteorological conditions that prevail during this time period. The lowest concentrations recorded at any time were 0.2 ppm a__ • the Puget Power Division Yard and 0.0 ppm at the Benson Road Station. Air quality impacts computations were based on hypothetical "worst-case" traffic generation and weather conditions. The 15-year construction cycle • was assumed to begin in 1979 and extend to 1994 (the horizon year). Air quality computations were made for average hourly traffic volumes during the critical 1 eight-hour period of maximum carbon monoxide concentrations. Cn no occasion during the forecast period does the predicted air quality exceed the existing national, Washington State or Puget Sound Regional standards of 9 ppm. t - Thus we have found that: • 1) Proper maintenance of the Renton Village storm drainage-system .. where it passes through the State Highway 1-405 right-of-way r:.`.. would restore system capacity to the design capacity. . • 2) The only critical effect of increased traffic volumes will be in • an area of existing congestion, the intersection of S. Grady Way • • and East Valley Freeway/Rainier Avenue S. However, the level • of service provided at this intersection is not likely to change. 3) National, state and regional air quality carbon monoxide concentra- tions will not be exceeded as a result of the proposed project. Should you have questions regarding these amendments, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, 'ES ASSOCIATES, INC. eg.) R. B. Kearton, h.D. t Director of Planning Services • - • s • • • • . 4 , • ,C/ 4i • • • • From the desk of CHIEF GEISSI"[;K 8/9/ 78 RE: Renton Village expansion The fire department re • _ requirements are as follows; l• The f :.. `i: fire flow will have to befor this area is - _ . . flow stud upgraded fornot sufficient fo Y on the computer• any nev structure as r the present • 2• Hydrant Per Water Engineering s will: Bring and .structures. _ `nave to be added to provide 3. All buildings the required-coverage for:- . : .-. requirements. 9s will have any new ' to; meet UFC and city ordin Hance. for fire. safety : : . - ' ' Richard Geissler, Chie/Pre-z-:..../—:__,........ ;f--t, — r_- _ • • • • • We feel that. consideration should be given to upgraaln• y �� J • Restoring the existing system to its original capacity o s other means. - • significantly relieve the flooding in this area. �1P but will noz , • • ,;, . RB:pmp PROPOSED/FINAL L__._'LARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE, ; JN-SIGNIFICANCE • Application No. - 1-3 S . PROPOSED Declaration _ 2.. Environmental Checklist No . D FINAL Declaration : Description of proposal _ :.;,:, ► rro ►.1 Vr•L-tr54- -- xFA Kt.Si•p : M - Proponenti. Tt'a� ' ? _ . , '• ui L-t_,A, 6 Location of Proposal . . )S S,::::, R.��{ t (.&.) ../ ,: A.. Lead Agency 3Lb6,• -12)1 ‘../, - This proposal has been determined to 0 have ❑ not have a - significant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS Ei is. • [] is not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 (2 ) (c) . This decisonwas made after review by the lead agencyof a completed • • checklist and other information on file with heleadnagency • ental Reasons for declaration of environmental significance : (2) ..:57-4,-,7V 1 (/73 77-2,Fx121.- 41;) ' . . 1 ` • Measures , if any, that could be taken to prevent or mitiga the environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a (proposed/final ) declaration,,of non-significance : 5 • G '• , 7-----›c• c,- . a_.._ ,,,__ z.e_._, . ,,_,____,. c...,40(._,_ _ • I • • c .ez-e—t-e.t/ 2 ,41._ ,Z.e.:JP; ,=, , / . j0 --.),„...1,,Z...?:;e4.,,..-, =__:v -)464.0%.e...42-4-,.....t-e-a_ Responsib Official • � C --^ a/4,y(2,--z._ - -- ,✓‘(„1„,1 5J , - Tit1e U i✓ //07--i „l 1 .7 2,--- Date (;/=. 7v S i g n a.t u r:: )/ -4 s - CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM • • FOR OFFICE USE ONLY • - Application No. • • Environmental Checklist No. • • • PROPOSED, date: FINAL, date: Declaration of Significance Declaration of Significance Declaration of Non-Significance Declaration of Non-Significance COMMENTS: • • Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C. RCW,- requires . • all state and O ocal governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing: private proposals.. The Act also requires that an EIS be prepared for all major actions signlficantly.affecting the quality of the. environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the .agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is ,such a major action. - - . Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required. or where - you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers. include your explanation in the space provided. or use additional pages if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele- vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with- out unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal . -not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers shbuld include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed. --even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with- out duplicating paperwork in the future. • NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in. the State of Washington for various types of proposals. Many• of the- questions may not apply to your proposal. If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM . I. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent • Renton Village Co. 2. Address and phone number of Proponent: • .15 5. Grady Renton, Washington' 9.8055 Telephone, 228-3000 • 3. Date Checklist submitted 4. Agency. requiring' Checklist City of Renton• Division of Buildings 5. Name of proposal , if applicable: Renton Village • 6. Nature and brief description of the. proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements . and other factors that will give an. accurate understanding of its scope and nature) : Expansion of existing Renton Village Shopping Center facilities to include a maximum of: (1) 150-room addition to existing Sheraton Hotel , (2) office buildings containing 600,000 gross square feet, (3) 350,000 gross square feet of general retail shopping space, (4) major department store containing 100,000 gross square feet, (5) malls to link existing and future shops, (6) future parking structures to handle additional needs for parking space, (7) expansion of the existing theater, and (8) a free-standing restaurant. • -2- 7. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ- mental setting of the proposal ) : See Addendum. • 8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal : Project completion is expected to extend over a time period lasting up to 15 years. 9. List of all permits, licenses or government approvals required for the proposal (federal , state and local--including rezones): Demolition, grading, building, utility hookup, small parcel rezone S-1 to L-I. • 10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes , explain: • • No. Checklist addresses a maximum development secnario. 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by • - your proposal? If yes. explain: No. - • 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the.pro- posal ; if none has been completed, but is expected -to be filed at some future • date. describe the nature of such application form: None. . • • • II . ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS • • (Explanations of all "yes" and 'maybe" answers are required) • (1) Earth. Will the .proposal result in: • . (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic • • X substructures? YES MAYBE (b) Disruptions . displacements , compaction or over- X • covering of the soil? • • YES. MAYBE NO (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief X features? YES MAYBE Nib (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any • unique geologic or physical features? X Yam— RATITE NO (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, X either on or off the site? • YES MAYBE NO (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands. or changes in siltation . deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay. inlet or lake? X YES MAYBE au— • Explanation: See Addendum. 00, -3- (2) Air. Will the proposal result in: (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air X quality? YET— MAYBE (b) The creation of objectionable odors? X VT MAYBE WU— (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or X regionally? YES MAYBE NO • Explanation: See Addendum. (3) Water. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in currents, or the course of direction of water movements , in either marine or fresh waters? X YES MAYBE - NO • (b) Changes in.absorption rates, drainage patterns , or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? X MAYBE 0— (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? X YES M YBE NO (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water X body? YES RKTITE NO (e) _ Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration surface water quality, including but not limited to X temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? TE—S-- MAYBE i- (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of X ground waters? YES MAYBE NO (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either through direct additions or withdrawals , or through X interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? YES MAYBE NO (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? Yam- RATITE NO (i ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available X for public water supplies? _vryMAYBE • Explanation: See Addendum. (4) Flora. Will the proposal result in: (a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs , grass, crops, X microflora and aquatic plants)? Tar— MAYBE WU— (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique , rare or X endangered species of flora? YES MAYBE 0— (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing X • species? -S— KATI€ N (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: See Addendum. f � • (5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of fauna (birds , land animals including reptiles . fish and shellfish. benthic organisms , X insects or microfauna)? YES MAYBE WO-- (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or X endangered species of fauna? YES MAYBE NO (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area . or result in a barrier to the migration or movement X of fauna? YES MAYBE NO (d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat•? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: • (6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: See Addendum. (7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or - X glare? YES MAYBE Mr Explanation: See Addendum. • • (8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the X present or planned land use of an area? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: See Addendum. _ (9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? YESX MAYBE NO (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? X YES MAYBE NO • Explanation: See Addendum. • (10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including. but not limited to, oil . pesticides , chemicals or radiation) X in the event of an accident or upset conditions? �S MAYBE NO Explanation: (11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, •density, or growth rate of the human population X of an area? yam-- MAYBE EY— • Explanation: • -5 • - ( 12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing , or X create a demand for additional housing? TES MAYBE NO Explanation: • (13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? X YES MAYBE NO • (b) Effects on existing parking facilities , or demand X for new parking? YES MAYBE NO (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? X YE- MAYBE N� (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or X movement of people and/or goods? • YES MAYBE NO (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? • X • YES • MAYBE NO (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles , bicyclists or pedestrians? X YET— RATITE FRY— . Explanation: - See Addendum. (14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas : • (a) Fire protection? • X YES MAYBE NO • (b) Police protection? X . YES • MAYBE •NO • (c) Schools? X YES MAYBE NO (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? X YES RATITE NO. (e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? X YES . MAYBENO (f) Other governmental services? X YES MAYBE NO • Explanation: See Addendum. • - (15) Energy,. Will the proposal result in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X ES M YBE NO (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require X the development of new sources of energy? Yam- MAYBE 0— Explanation: See Addendum. (16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: (a) Power or natural gas? X YES MBE NO • (b) Communications systems? X YES MMAYBE NO (c) Water? X YES MAYBE ‘ NO { • -6- (d) Sewer or septic tanks? X YES M V6E NO (e) Storm water drainage? X YEms- MAYBE O— M Solid waste and disposal? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: See Addendum. (17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding X mental health)? Yrr MAYBE i — • Explanation: (1B) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view• open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive X site open to public view? YES MAYBE NO • Explanation: • (19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? X YES MA rYBE NO• Explanation: • (20) Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical X site, structure, object or building? Y€S MAYBE I0 Explanation: • • • • III. SIGNATURE • I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information. is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla- ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part., Proponent: (signed) • (name printed) • CHECKLIST ADDENDUM 7. Location of Proposal The proposed project is an extension of the existing Renton Village shopping mall , located in the east one-half of the northeast one- quarter of Section 19, Township 23 North, Range 5 East. The expansion would be bounded by Talbot Road on the east, Grady Way on the north, I-405 on the south and Rainier Avenue on the west. The project site is surrounded by development and is itself presently committed to commercial buildings, parking space, a Puget Sound Power and Light Company switching station and low-quality shrub and tree vegetation. Because of these existing uses or conditions, physical environmental impacts associated with Renton Village expansion will be minimized, and less significant than if the development were in a less intensely urbanized area. Impacts of the proposed expansion are primarily related to transportation, public services and resource use. These impacts, discussed in the body of the checklist, will be minimal because adequate transportation and public financed services are already available and significant disruption or alteration of service would be unnecessary. (1) Earth (b) Expansion of Renton Village will require some disruption of earth due to site preparation and clearing. Following project completion, parking lots, landscaping, or buildings would cover nearly the entire project area. Site landscaping would cover substantially more of the project site than the five percent required by the City of Renton. (2) Air (a) Minor short-term deterioration of ambient air quality could result during construction. Depending on weather conditions, dust from earth movement might become airborne. Sprinkling would mitigate • • dust impacts. When the project is complete, increased vehicular traffic will cause long-term but minor deterioration of air quality. Air quality impacts would be comparatively minor be- cause of the extent of development in the surrounding area and the heavy traffic associated with I-405. (b) Paving of the surface areas may result in objectionable odors on a short-term, one-time basis and will be dispersed from the site by winds. (3) Water (b) The surface soil has already been compacted and is now nearly impervious. Therefore, the resulting reduction in absorption rates and increase in surface water runoff from overcovering of uncovered portions of the site will be minimal . Neither will alter the regional groundwater or surface water regime. (4) Flora (c) Landscaping of the project area will include the introduction of native and non-native species. Existing non-native and native species will be replaced with species compatible with species already present in the area. (6) Noise Construction-related noise will be noticeable to passersby during working hours. When the project is complete, ambient noise increases should be insignificant because of existing high levels of noise associated with traffic on interstate 405 and nearby arterials. (7) Light and Glare The proposed expansion would increase light and glare over amounts currently generated but the impacts associated with the project would be similar to light and glare generated from similar buildings else- where. (8) Land Use The proposal would add to the existing Renton Village shopping center. The future expansion area is currently occupied by a Puget Power switching station, the office/factory area of Buyken Stamping & Machine Works, Inc. , a veterinary clinic and parking for Renton Village. Proposed retail and office uses would be consistent with existing zoning and the "commerical" use suggested for the area by Renton's comprehensive plan. Expansion eastward to Talbot Road will necessitate removal or sub- stantial reduction in size of the Puget Power switching station located southeast of the intersection of Grady Way and Talbot Road. A small parcel in the northeast corner, presently zoned S-1 (single-family residential ), would need to be rezoned, to either M-P (manufacturing park) or L-I (light industry), to accommodate proposed uses. This required zoning change would reflect the comprehensive plan's suggestion of light industrial/manufacturing park use for that area. (9) Natural Resources (a) and (h) The proposed project 'will increase the rate of use of natural resources and contribute to a depletion of some non- renewable natural resources. However, the amounts would not be disproportionate to those for similar development elsewhere and would be less than for similar developments in areas requiring additional utility service. The planned location permits more N . intensive use of capital facilities in place. Significant long- term conservation of natural resources would be achieved, because development is an expansion of existing facilities and will be located in an already urbanized area. (13) Transportation (a) Additional traffic will be generated as a result of the increased services provided and the anticipated increased patronage and support requirements. (b) New parking facilities will be provided on-site in accordance with city requirements. (c) Impacts on existing transportation systems will be in the form of increased traffic on surrounding arterials and the adjacent . access ramps on I-405. The major impact will be in the form of additional traffic during the morning and evening "rush hours" on nearby routes that already are heavily used at those times. A Metro Park-and-Ride Lot, to be built across Grady Way from the site, will also attract "rush hour" traffic. However, the prox- imity of this facility will provide the site with bus service as a potential alternative to private transportation. (d) The present pattern of circulation of people and goods may be altered to the extent that the volume of persons using Renton Village may increase. Possible minor changes in site access would also affect the circulation pattern. (f) Increased traffic volumes may' result-in more traffic hazards, and increased ingress-egress concomitant with Village expansion may require additonal traffic flow regulation to minimize these" hazards. Existing traffic control strategies will help reduce the hazards identified in design stages. Additional signalization is now in place. The Renton Traffic Engineering Department will operate these as actuated signals and coordinate them with other signalization in this same area of Renton. (14) Public Services Because of the location of the proposed development, near existing fire and police service centers, development will cause impacts on public services which are less than for similar development located further from the city core. (a) Fire protection. The Renton Fire Department is capable of meeting existing need for fire protection services at Renton Village. On the first response to a call at Renton Village, there would be a minimum os 12 fire fighting personnel available within 2 to 4 minutes from Stations No. 11 and No. 12. (b) Police protection. Expansion of Renton Village will not create a need for new or altered police services. However, the impact of this development combined with other development proposed for the Renton urban area within the next few years may require additional personnel . (15) Energy (a) Substantial amounts of fuel and energy will be needed for con- struction and maintenance of the additional facilities. However, some net increase in efficient use of energy will result from the fact that the urbanized setting already has powerlines and energy sources. Energy for the planned expansion will be all electric, and therefore there will be no on-site consumption of fossil fuel. (b) The development of the project site will increase demand upon existing and future sources of energy. However, this development in itself will not require the development of new sources of energy. (16) Utilities (a - f) The utilities necessary to serve the expansion of Renton Village are presently in place with enough capacity to serve the entire site. Service stub extension of water, sewer and storm drainage lines are required, and development of new systems will not be required. Storm water, sanitary sewage and water distribution facilities related to the proposal will require the usual maintenance procedures followed by the City of Renton Public Works Department. (18) Aesthetics The planned expansion of Renton Village will be a complementary addition to the City of Renton. The amount of landscaping planned for the project site will exceed the five percent of the land area required by the City of Renton. Expansion of the present facilities will require removel or substantial reduction in the size of the switching station at the northwest corner of the site, as well as re- moval of the scrub vegetation that has sprung up on the compacted earth and gravel at the east edge of the site. Also,the. old existing office/factory of Buyken Stamping & Machine Works, Inc. and existing veterinary clinic will be removed and replaced by new structures with - appropriate landscaping. New landscaping will consist of mostly native species indigenous to the Pacific Northwest, and some non-native species. All landscaping will be compatible with natural vegetation in this area. No views will be obstructed by new construction. ' I APPENDIX A Federal Aviation Administration regulations regarding building heights are applicable to the proposed development, because the location is within 20,000 feet of the end of an airport runway. For any proposed structure within that distance, form 7460-1, Notice of Proposed Construction or Alteration, must be filed with the FFA if the structure height would exceed one-hundredth the distance from run- way end to structure base. On the proposed site, this distance could range from 5,500 to 6,000 feet, so filing with the FFA would be required for proposed structures over 55 to 60 feet in height -- approximately five to six stories. Navigational and aircraft safety lighting is typically required on any structure of a height exceeding 1/34 the distance between the runway end and the base of the proposed structure. For the proposal site, this standard would apply to structures 161 to to 176 feet tall -- 16 to 17 stories. The structures proposed for the addition to Renton Village will be of heights less than this range. . • • • • ' • , • •• (/� \` ' r -�Lsi !lam :2" / �L _:: ,`\ i 1\ ,•""\\. A ) '''��y j/ l� j� ij ' /iS�SwitR9 �/ I I Ii j I( 4 ,f r • Ir_ 1 ,, I Ic �I �%.��' -- 1 I i 1� iti � tiG j ,, N. ,.... Li i..________j_.__.„ ,... 1 1 ,s„,,,,,,f1/4.-.....__,.....,..r-- �I � � „-----1 k------ � ���-..r•'+ti 1 \•.,.......:...7....."4".Z\4."' "'ftt. '3\i'VV"*"/' AA \ ‘•.... ...'Vt.' ... ...i1.1:...... • -"-....-_---------7- los gip• 1 NOi r • SCALE IN • J ( PROFESSIONAL CERT IF:CA7: N OWN: APPD: I�w�� ��/rr!!l���/� CCALE DATE: • 0 - "�/� �i•..ti ASSOCIATES i m SCALE: RENTON VILLAGE Lsd/6(j�l d1✓ INCORPORATED REVISIONS SV DATE O ENGINlERING•PLANNING• INVIRONMENTAL ANALwIS OSURVEYING AND MAPPING•SYSTEMS I .N700 NOIITHUP WAY• WM•WA••004 1.0.1.as••EE• m.o•••Was 0676N ; CITY OF RENTON lyig@gOUET :DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCEI MAY 2 21985 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO.: ECF-050-85 ',' • APPLICATION NO(s).: Not applicable THE CAWSON PARTNERSHIP • DESCRIPTION'OF PROPOSAL: Application for building permit to allow the construction of a seven story concrete frame building (Two Renton Place) having approximately 130.000 square feet for office use and associated parking. PROPONENT: Renton Village Company LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Located on the west side of Talbot Road South at the 1100 block. LEAD AGENCY: • City of Renton. Building and Zoning Department. The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable F.: - significant adverse Impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) Is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2Xc). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. • This information is available to the public on request. This DNS is issued under 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 15 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by June 3. 1985 Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South. Renton. WA 98055 • Phone: 235-2550 You should be prepared to make specific factual'objections. Contact City of Renton. Building and Zoning Department to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. DATE OF DECISION: May 15. 1985 - PUBLICATION DATE: May 20. 1985 Y / 624 !.i...... • onald G. Nelson Larry . Spri a-r Building and Zoning Director Policy Develo ent Direc or 1 r`J7'1it1 .� 7_1 i' : t 4. (.1 ••", Richard C. Hou ton �� „i id 01, if,) r L34 Public Works bfrector n FEB 2 81°86 BUILr: G/ZONING DEPT, 1 c M ATTACHMENT #13 P8 47 CiT1' O,= RENTON RENTON VILLAGE COMP ` l ( G; (1 `YI [1! n 830 LOGAN BUILDING _ SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 FEB 81985 624-5810 BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. February 5, 1985 Roger J. Blaylock Zoning Administrator The City of Renton Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 , Dear Mr. Blaylock: I am in receipt of your letter of January 28, 1985, and appreciate your desire to be of assistance during what we hope, to be a rather smooth administrative rezone process to convert our property from heavy industrial to business. • During our meeting on January 9th it was the consensus of the group that we should wait until after we have been granted our building permit for Two Renton Place before proceeding with the rezone activity. I certainly appreciate your volunteering to help and I look forward to working with you when we take on this project, probably later this year. Sincerely your, . J S DDY JONE oin Venture Manager The Callison Par rship CITY I RENTON C E `` t. -g F71 1.7) k . JA.N 15 1985 BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. January 9, 1985 Architecture TWO RENTON PLACE Programming MINUTES OF MEETING Planning Interior Design Project Number 84266 Those Present: Larry Springer City of Renton Jim Hanson City of Renton Ron Nelson City of Renton Dick Naughton City of Renton Jim Matthew Renton Fire Department Dick Causey Puget Western Inc. Jim Warjone Renton Village Corrpany Loren Laskow Renton Village Corrpany Everett Johnson Renton Village Corrpnay Bill Lewis Lease/Crutcher Construction Rick King The Callison Partnership Location: City of Renton, Conference Room 3rd Floor, 1:30 p.m. Items Discussed: A. King presented building proposal as represented on January 8, 1985 site plan and Renton Village schematic site plan January 19, 1984. B. Zoning was discussed stating that under current and intended zoning per comprehensive plan use proposed is an approved land use. C. Submittal for construction would not require property rezone if submittal process was begun in early 1985. D. There will be no site plan review required based on preliminary information presented at this time. 1423 Third Avenue Suite 300 Seattle,Washington 98101 (206)623-4646 A Professional Service Corporation L . TWO RENTON PLACE MINUTES OF MEETING Project Number 84266 January 9, 1985 page two E. Regarding the intersection of Talbot Road South and Renton Village Place, the City of Renton will probably require the installation of a traffic signal. Gary Norris of the City Traffic Division is the contact for specific requirements and City specification data for this signal and related street intersection improvements to Renton Village Place. F. For project estimating purposes cost should be estimated at approximately $100,000.00. Requirements for interface with master control on lighting is 'to be confirmed with Norris.. Signal should include dual indicators and underground control. G. Project will be responsible only for initial installation. After which the 'City shall accept installation and be responsible for ongoing maintenance costs. H. Savings on cost and schedule may 'be realized by having the project subcontract this work independent of the City however, use of an approved subcontractor is recommended. I. ' Storm drainage on the project and storm water detention appear. acceptable based on site installed storm water improvements recently completed designed to satisfy overall site improvements. J. All site access as shown off 'Renton Village Place is acceptable and preferred over access off Talbot Road. K. On review of water related requirements the fire department will require a looped main service for the building, size of service to be determined based on fire flow requirements, Matthew will provide required flow and Houghton' will confirm. For estimating purposes and 8-10" line should be used. L. In addition to building water service, extension'of the City 24" main presently installed to project southeast corner will be required along eastern property boundary to northern extreme of developed property. Cost for this main' extension is to be review with Public works. ' The City may' share costs due to the size of this main. Possibly providing costs for the oversizing of this line above that size required for building demand. M.' Regarding waste disposal it was recommended that a concrete slab be provided for dumpster and that Jerry' Hardick of'Rainier Disposal be contacted regarding specific requirements. • TWO RENTON PLACE . MINUTES OF MEETING Project Number 84266 . January 9, 1985 page three . N. Pedestrian circulation for parking provided on portion of site across Renton Village Place be accommodated at intersection with Talbot Road only. O. Off-site parking permit will not be required as all property in proposed development is contiguous. P. SEPA requirements and Environmental Checklist preparation and submittal data should include the following specific information: . I. Traffic/transportation data including, trip data and impact .on existing roadway-loads.' 2. Building height and view blockage information, if applicable. • 3. Review of. potential .for glare. Q. City Review and related .time frames were discussed as follows: ' Environmental Review will take the:City 3 weeks .if all required engineering study data is included and acceptable. Following Environmental Review a two week public notice/appeal period is required prior .to issuance of piling/fill or foundation permit issuance. Total time frame to be anticipated prior to start of construction . activities is 4-6 weeks if .no unforeseen difficulties should arise. R. All City Right.of Way related improvements must be submitted in City approved format for acceptance. On request, the City will provide mylar drafting sheets 'to ,assure acceptable format. S. City costs to be anticipated related to project include the following: - Building Permit Fee - based on UBC, Chapter 5 - Water Assessment @ .$.04/sq.ft.. development area - . Sewer Assessment @ $.04/sq.ft. development area - Environmental Review Fee ' - Mechanical Permit Fee - Plumbing Permit Fee'. • • - Electrical Permit Fee ' - . Storm 'Water Permit Fee • . - :Sewer Permit Fee TWO RENTON PLACE MINUTES OF MEETING Project Number 84266 January 9, 1985 page four There should not be any anticipated bond requirements from the City provide all improvements are completed prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy. T. Meeting was concluded at approximately 3:15 p.m. Opib Richard King, AIA The Callison Partnership, PS RK:kp/74 cc: Those Present Tony Callison