Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRegular Council Agenda Packet - 02 Dec 2013 - Agenda - PdfAGENDA RENTON CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING December 2, 2013 Monday, 7 p.m. 1.CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2.ROLL CALL 3.SPECIAL PRESENTATION a. King County Councilmember Julia Patterson 4.PUBLIC HEARING a. Six-month moratorium on accepting applications for business licenses or permits for medical and/or recreational marijuana businesses 5.PUBLIC MEETING a. Trace Matthew Annexation - 10% Notice of Intent to Commence Annexation Proceedings; 4.54 acres located in the vicinity of 154th Ave. SE & SE 139th Pl 6.ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT 7.AUDIENCE COMMENT (Speakers must sign up prior to the Council meeting. Each speaker is allowed five minutes. The first comment period is limited to one-half hour. The second comment period later on in the agenda is unlimited in duration.) When you are recognized by the Presiding Officer, please walk to the podium and state your name and city of residence for the record, SPELLING YOUR LAST NAME. 8.CONSENT AGENDA The following items are distributed to Councilmembers in advance for study and review, and the recommended actions will be accepted in a single motion. Any item may be removed for further discussion if requested by a Councilmember. a. Council meeting minutes of 11/25/2013. Council concur. b. Administrative Services Department recommends approval of an addendum for Project #67 to the Community Connectivity Consortium agreement (CAG-11-176), to provide additional fiber optic cable from S. 7th St. and Talbot Rd. S. to S. 7th St. and Rainier Ave. S. Council concur. c. Community and Economic Development Department requests final approval of the 15-year latecomer agreement (LA-11-01) submitted by the Renton Housing Authority for watermain extension related to the Glennwood Townhomes project located at 1139 and 1147 Glennwood Ave NE; and requests authorization to finalize the agreement per City Code. Refer to Utilities Committee. d. Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of Supplemental Agreement No. 7 to CAG-09-077, with Berger/Abam Engineers, Inc., in the amount of $334,791 for additional construction administration and inspection services on the SW 27th St./Strander Blvd. Extension project. Refer to Transportation (Aviation) Committee. Page 1 of 198 e. Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with KPG, PS in the amount of $204.502.46 for construction management services for the Highlands to Boeing/Landing Pedestrian Connection project. Refer to Transportation (Aviation) Committee. f. Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a Local Agency Certification Acceptance Qualification Agreement with the Washington State Department of Transportation delegating authority to develop, advertise, award, and manage agency transportation projects. Refer to Transportation (Aviation) Committee. g. Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of an airport utility easement agreement with AT&T establishing a new lease rate of $16,578.90 annually through 10/31/2025. Refer to Transportation (Aviation) Committee. 9.UNFINISHED BUSINESS Topics listed below were discussed in Council committees during the past week. Those topics marked with an asterisk (*) may include legislation. Committee reports on any topics may be held by the Chair if further review is necessary. a. Committee of the Whole: 2014 Legislative Priorities b. Committee on Committees: 2014 Council Committee Assignments c. Finance Committee: Vouchers d. Planning & Development Committee: Title IV (Development Regulations) Docket #9*; Comprehensive Plan Amendments*; Affordable Housing - McOmber Correspondence 10.RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES Resolution: a. 2014 Fee Schedule (Approved via 11/25/2013 Committee of the Whole committee report) Ordinances for second and final reading: a. Establishing the 2014 property tax levy (1st reading 11/25/2013) b. Decreasing water utility tax (1st reading 11/25/2013) c. 2013/2014 Mid-biennium budget adjustment (1st reading 11/25/2013) d. Deed of donation from Erwin & Scott for S. Carr Rd properties (1st reading 11/25/2013) 11.NEW BUSINESS (Includes Council Committee agenda topics; call 425-430-6512 for recorded information.) 12.AUDIENCE COMMENT 13.ADJOURNMENT Page 2 of 198 COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE AGENDA (Preceding Council Meeting) COUNCIL CHAMBERS December 2, 2013 Monday, 6 p.m. 2014 Legislative Priorities • Hearing assistance devices for use in the Council Chambers are available upon request to the City Clerk • CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS ARE TELEVISED LIVE ON GOVERNMENT ACCESS CHANNEL 21 AND ARE RECABLECAST: Tues. & Thurs. at 11 AM & 9 PM, Wed. & Fri at 9 AM & 7 PM and Sat. & Sun. at 1 PM & 9 PM Page 3 of 198 !"# $ %& ' ( ) * + ' ,' - # . % $ %& ' % % / ) % & & % ' . . ) % # . +, $ 0/ # . % % 0 & " % & # +! $ & 0 & ' % ,'+,1 % / % & % ' & % ) % 2 3 4)23 5 $ % 2 ( ' & % 6 & )1, 7 ' - 8# 17 )1, & & # )23 % & # & 9 +-+,' 7 &% . $ ' & % :& % &.% % # ; # %% ' & % %% %% < ' & 7 &% ! 3 ' -' 3 :& &% & 7 $ % ' 5a. - Trace Matthew Annexation - 10% Notice of Intent to Commence Annexation Page 4 of 198 5a. - Trace Matthew Annexation - 10% Notice of Intent to Commence Annexation Page 5 of 198 CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Subject/Title: Consortium Fiber Project Agreement 67 Meeting: Regular Council - 02 Dec 2013 Exhibits: Issue Paper Agreement Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board: Administrative Services Staff Contact: Ron Hansen, Network Systems Manager, x-6873 Recommended Action: Council Concur Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required: $ Transfer Amendment: $ Amount Budgeted: $ Revenue Generated: $ Total Project Budget: $ City Share Total Project: $ SUMMARY OF ACTION: Council approved an updated and expanded interlocal agreement that consolidates the Eastside Fiber Consortium and government agencies in the Valley Cities group into the “Community Connectivity Consortium” to jointly construct, manage, and share fiber optic resources in August of 2011 The City of Renton and the fiber Consortium have worked under this Consortium Agreement and partnered on a number of projects which have resulted in many schools and City facilities within the community being connected with high-speed fiber optic connections as well as getting access to fiber and facilities outside the City. This specific project will provide a 288 strand backbone fiber optic cable from South 7th Street and Talbot Road South to South 7th Street and Rainier Ave S. (SE corner) in Renton, adding to consortium backbone fiber and continuing to build around Lake Washington and to Snohomish and Pierce counties. The total cost of this project is approximately $162,450 (including $37K UASI Grant funds and $125,000 in kind contribution (sharing conduit) from the City of Renton). STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the Interlocal Agreement to be executed with participating agencies. 8b. - Administrative Services Department recommends approval of an addendum Page 6 of 198 FINANCE AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY M E M O R A N D U M DATE:December 05, 2013 TO:Randy Corman , Council President Members of the Renton City Council VIA:Denis Law, Mayor FROM:Mehdi Sadri, Information Technology Director STAFF CONTACT:Ronald Hansen, Network Systems Manager SUBJECT:Consortium Fiber Project Agreement 67, Backbone fiber from Talbot Road S to Rainier Ave S, Renton ISSUE: Should the City approve Consortium Project Agreement with the City of Bellevue, the City of Kirkland, and the University of Washington to share City underground conduit in exchange for fiber optic cabling within and outside the City limits? RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Consortium Project Agreement. BACKGROUND SUMMARY: Council approved an updated and expanded interlocal agreement that consolidates the Eastside Fiber Consortium and government agencies in the Valley Cities group into the “Community Connectivity Consortium” to jointly construct, manage, and share fiber optic resources in August of 2011 The City of Renton and the fiber Consortium have worked under this Consortium Agreement and partnered on a number of projects which have resulted in many schools and City facilities within the community being connected with high-speed fiber optic connections as well as getting access to fiber and facilities outside the City. This specific project will provide a 288 strand backbone fiber optic cable from South 7th Street and Talbot Road South to South 7th Street and Rainier Ave S. (SE corner) in Renton, adding to consortium backbone fiber and continuing to build around Lake Washington and to Snohomish and Pierce counties. The total cost of this project is approximately $162,450 (including $37K UASI Grant funds and $125,000 in kind contribution (sharing conduit) from the City of Renton). 8b. - Administrative Services Department recommends approval of an addendum Page 7 of 198 CONCLUSION: Staff recommends that the City Council approve the interlocal agreement and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the Consortium project agreement to be executed with participating agencies. cc:Bonnie Walton, City Clerk Iwen Wang, Finance and Information Technology Administrator Mehdi Sadri, Information Technology Director 8b. - Administrative Services Department recommends approval of an addendum Page 8 of 198 1 Consortium Project Agreement 67 City of Bellevue 450 110th Ave NE Bellevue, WA 98009 City of Kirkland 123 Fifth Ave Kirkland, WA 98033 City of Renton 1055 S Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 University of Washington 4545 15th Ave NE Seattle, WA 98105 Provide for the design and installation of fiber optic cabling between South 7th Street and Talbot Road South and South 7th Street and Rainier Avenue South, Renton, Washington. An Addendum to the Community Connectivity Consortium’s Project Agreement Template Policy 8b. - Administrative Services Department recommends approval of an addendum Page 9 of 198 2 Table of Contents I.Project Description.................................................................................................. 3 A.Project Number 67............................................................................................... 3 B.Project Name........................................................................................................ 3 C.Project Description............................................................................................... 3 D.Lead Agency / Project Manager........................................................................... 3 E.Participating Agencies ......................................................................................... 3 II.Physical Description of Project............................................................................... 3 A.Project Route........................................................................................................ 3 B.Points of Demarcation.......................................................................................... 3 C.Facilities to be Used, Owners and Managers....................................................... 3 D.Project Specifications and Scope of Work........................................................... 4 E.Fiber Apportionment...........................................Error! Bookmark not defined. III.Anticipated Project Budget....................................Error! Bookmark not defined. A.Construction Budget ...........................................Error! Bookmark not defined. B.Construction Cost Apportionment......................Error! Bookmark not defined. C.In-Kind Asset Contributions...............................Error! Bookmark not defined. D.Maintenance Responsibilities and Costs, including Ongoing Maintenance and Responsibilities for Moves..................................................................Error! Bookmark not defined. IV.Apportionment of Liability....................................Error! Bookmark not defined. V.Project Schedule.....................................................Error! Bookmark not defined. VI Changes or Addenda to Project Agreement Template PolicyError! Bookmark not defined. 8b. - Administrative Services Department recommends approval of an addendum Page 10 of 198 3 I. Project Description A. Project Number 67 B. Project Name Consortium Backbone S 7th St/Talbot Road S to S 7th St/Rainier Ave. S, Renton. C. Project Description Provide a 288 strand fiber optic cable from South 7th Street and Talbot Road South to South 7th Street and Rainier Ave. S. (southeast corner) in Renton, as generally illustrated in Exhibit A (Route Illustration). D. Lead Agency / Project Manager City of Bellevue E. Participating Agencies City of Renton City of Bellevue City of Kirkland University of Washington II. Physical Description of Project A. Project Route From a manhole in the right of way at the northwest corner of the Brown Bear Car Wash lot at S 7th Street and Talbot Road S to a 25-TA vault adjacent to the KC RR ITS termination cabinet on the southeast corner of Rainier Ave S and S 7th St. B.Points of Demarcation A 25-TA vault adjacent to the KC RR ITS termination cabinet on the southeast corner of Rainier Ave S at S 7th St., Renton, Washington. Manhole on the northwest side of the Brown Bear Car Wash at S 7th and Talbot Road S, Renton, Washington C. Facilities to be Used, Owners and Managers City of Renton existing underground conduit including all vaults, hand holds and traffic signal cabinets necessary to the installation of the fiber optic cable. All upgrades to conduit systems installed on City of Renton property and in City of Renton right of way will be owned and maintained by City of Renton where the conduit system is installed. 8b. - Administrative Services Department recommends approval of an addendum Page 11 of 198 4 D. Project Specifications and Scope of Work This project shall meet all the requirements of the City of Renton Public Works Department, i.e. traffic control plans, street use permits, waiver of existing underground ordinance, city business license requirements, and the City of Renton IT Department. Route Preparation Work to be done during normal working hours: Inventory and proof the route described above in A. Project Route from an existing 25-TA vault on the southeast corner of Rainier Ave. South at South 7th St. to an existing City of Renton manhole/vault on the southeast side of the intersection of South 7th St. and Talbot Road South (adjacent to the Brown Bear Car Wash) in Renton. This route utilizes existing City of Renton infrastructure including conduit, pathway, handholds and vaults. Note: All construction instructions are subject to conditions that may not be known before proofing/locates are completed. However, the contractor is responsible for knowing all project conditions. Underground and Aerial Fiber Placement Work to be done during normal working hours: 1.Installation shall conform to generally accepted, industry standards. 2.All cabling will be labeled with the UASI Project data and emergency contact information. 3.Project will install a 288 strand, single mode, all wave, full spectrum, low water peak fiber including ITU-T G.652. 4.Fusion splices along the route such that there are no breaks in the Consortium strands and that all Consortium fibers are continuous strands between the identified points of demarcation. 5.Attach an orange label with black lettering to the 288 count SM fiber cable at each access point reading: Purchased with 2010/UASI Funds Grant No.2010-SS-T0-0084. Fiber Optic Cable City of Renton @ 425-430-6870 6.Where toneable medium does not already exist in the conduit, provide and install toneable mule tape along the fiber cable in the underground such that future locates can identify the path of the conduit. In hand holes and vaults where the mule tape is not continuous splice the conductors together using water and corrosion resistant splicing crimps and secure the mule tape such that it cannot be pulled into the open conduit end. Fiber Terminations and Splicing Work to be done during normal working hours: Important note: Confirm all splice details prior to undertaking any work under this section. 8b. - Administrative Services Department recommends approval of an addendum Page 12 of 198 5 The items below will be detailed in a separate splice document. Where appropriate, each participating agency will provide the splice details for the fibers assigned to them in E. Fiber Apportionment below. Any splice diagrams/tables/details will be consistent with paragraph E. below and are noted in paragraph F. Fiber Splice Details below. 1.At the City of Renton manhole at South 7th Street and Talbot Road South leave a 100 foot service loop with 288 strands spliced 1-288 to the existing 1-288 strand Consortium cable. 2.At the 25-TA vault adjacent to the KC RR ITS termination cabinet on the southeast corner of Rainier Avenue South, a 100 foot slack loop shall be left with the splicing of strands 73 through 288 to a cable coming from the City of Tukwila. The remaining 72 strands are to be left unterminated. 3.Splice cases in this agreement shall be labeled with orange label with black machine reading: Purchased with 2010/UASI Funds Grant No.2010-SS-T0-0084. PA#37 Fiber Optic Cable City of Renton @ 425-430-6870 Purchased with 2010/UASI Funds Grant No.2010-SS-T0-0084. PA#42 Fiber Optic Cable City of Renton @ 425-430-6870 Purchased with 2010/UASI Funds Grant No.2010-SS-T0-0084. PA#67 Fiber Optic Cable City of Renton @ 425-430-6870 Existing splice cases will be identified by the project manager for appropriate labeling. 4.Test procedures shall follow industry standards, specifically TIA/EIA-455 and shall be submitted to the owner for approval prior to final invoicing. Test results shall be submitted on DVD. Testing shall be coordinated with the owner such that all splices are tested. Note: more splice sections may follow detailing splices to the owner agencies when the fiber topology and fiber count and ownership has been fully negotiated. E. Fiber Apportionment One 288 count single-mode fiber optic cable will be installed along the entire above described route. Actual strand assignments will be determined through the splice tables and be dependent upon existing fiber splice connections. 8b. - Administrative Services Department recommends approval of an addendum Page 13 of 198 6 1.Fibers 1 - 24 (24 fibers) will be owned and maintained by the City of Renton.* 2.Fibers 25 – 72 (48 fibers) will be held in trust by the consortium for the future use of current or future consortium members which may include: cities, school districts, fire districts, water districts, hospital districts and others. 3.Fibers 73 - 78 (6 fibers) will be owned and maintained by the City of Bellevue. 4.Fibers 79 – 80 (2 fibers) will be owned and maintained by the City of Renton. 5.Fibers 81 - 108 (28 fibers) will be held in trust by the consortium for the future use of current or future consortium members which may include: cities, school districts, fire districts, water districts, hospital districts and others. 6.Fibers 109 - 132 (24 fibers) will be owned and maintained by the University of Washington. 7.Fibers 133 - 134 (2 fibers) will be owned and maintained by the City of Kirkland. 8.Fibers 135 - 288 (154 fibers) will be held in trust by the consortium for the future use of current or future consortium members which may include: cities, school districts, fire districts, water districts, hospital districts and others. . *Strand numbers may change dependent upon strand assignments by King County. F. Fiber Splice Details Attached as Exhibit B of this agreement is the project splice table. III. Anticipated Project Budget A. Construction Budget Estimated Construction Budget Item Description Quantity Price Extended Provide 288 single mode fiber optic cable strands from a 25-TA vault adjacent to the KC RR ITS termination cabinet on the southeast corner of Rainier Ave S. at S 7th St, Renton to a manhole/vault on the southwest corner of South 7th Street and Talbot Road South, Renton. Project includes all necessary infrastructure improvements necessary to complete the described route. 1 1 $25,000.00 Tax 9.8 %$2,450.00 Total $27,450.00 8b. - Administrative Services Department recommends approval of an addendum Page 14 of 198 7 B. Construction Cost Apportionment Construction Cost Apportionment Table Participating Agency Cost UASI Grant Funds $27,450.00 Total $27,450.00 C. In-Kind Asset Contributions In-Kind Asset Contribution Table Contribution Type and Agency Value (est.) UASI Grant Administration/Project Mgmt – City of Bellevue $10,000 Conduit 2,500 feet in length – City of Renton $125,000 Total In-Kind Contributions $135,000 Project Funding (see para B, above) $27,450 Estimated Total Project Valuation $162,450 D. Maintenance Responsibilities and Costs, including Ongoing Maintenance and Responsibilities for Moves. Expected future maintenance has been broken down into the categories below. If a maintenance issue arises that is not listed below, those costs will be proportionately split based on fiber ownership in each fiber segment by the participating agencies. Locates The City of Renton agrees to perform or pay for all locates required and requested through Underground Utilities Locate Center (UULC) for the fiber and conduit installed as a result of this agreement that is on property owned by the City, in the City right-of-way and in the right-of-way in potential annexation areas. Relocation Any and all relocations will be borne by the parties to this agreement. Cost shall be apportioned based on the percent of fiber owned by each participating agency. Repairs/Breaks The Community Connectivity Consortium and the City of Renton shall be responsible for immediate and timely repair of all breaks or outages of fiber in the project agreement. The Community Connectivity Consortium and 8b. - Administrative Services Department recommends approval of an addendum Page 15 of 198 8 City of Renton shall contract with a competent and qualified vendor to provide 7x24x365, four hour response to any fiber breaks/outages that happen on the fiber segments in the agreement. The Community Connectivity Consortium and/or the City of Renton will determine Cost Apportionment using a formula based on the percentage of fiber owned by each partner to this agreement. Upon completion of the repair, the Community Connectivity Consortium or the City of Renton shall invoice each partner for their share of costs. IV. Apportionment of Liability During construction, the Contractor shall be responsible for the project work and the project site. In the event that the project work causes or contributes to any harm, damage, injury or loss to any person or property, whether during construction or after completion of the project, each party shall be responsible as set forth in Section VI, Indemnification and Limitation of Liability, of the Consortium Project Agreement Template Policy (adopted Feb. 2, 2012). Each participating agency to this agreement shall ensure that the participating agency and all persons performing the Work, including without limitation project suppliers and subcontractors, maintain in effect at all times during the Work, coverage or insurance in accordance with the applicable laws relating to worker’s compensation and employer’s liability insurance (including, but not limited to, the Washington Industrial Insurance Act and the laws of the state in which any such person was hired), regardless of whether such coverage or insurance is mandatory or merely elective under the law. The Lead Agency or contracting party shall furnish to Participating Agencies such assurance and evidence of such coverage or insurance (such as copies of insurance policies and Certificates of Compliance issued by the Washington State Department of Labor and Industries) as Participating Agencies may request. Each Participating Agency shall maintain in full force and effect throughout the term of this Agreement, a minimum of One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) liability insurance for property damage and bodily injury. In satisfying the insurance requirements set forth in this section, the Participating Agency may self-insure against such risks in such amounts as are consistent with good utility practice or shall obtain a coverage agreement through a Risk Pool authorized by Chapter 39.24 RCW which shall provide liability coverage to the Participating Agency for the liabilities contractually assumed by the Participating Agency in this Agreement. At the time of execution of this Agreement, and prior to commencement of performance of any of the Work, each Participating Agency shall furnish Participating Agencies, upon request, with a Certificates of Insurance as evidence that policies providing insurance (or self-insurance) with such provisions, coverage’s and limits are in full force and effect. V. Project Schedule Task Target Completion Date Circulate and sign copies of the project PA August 2013 Award Contract/Obtain permits October 2013 Terminate and splice fibers November 2013 8b. - Administrative Services Department recommends approval of an addendum Page 16 of 198 9 VI Changes or Addenda to Project Agreement Template Policy This Agreement shall run concurrent with the Project Agreement Template Policy document. This document may supersede the Project Agreement Template Policy document to the extent it contains terms and conditions which change, modify, delete, add to, supplement or otherwise amend the terms and conditions of the Project Agreement Template Policy document. 8b. - Administrative Services Department recommends approval of an addendum Page 17 of 198 10 Approvals IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Project Agreement on the respective dates indicated below. _________________________ ________ __________________ Brad Miyake Date City Attorney Acting City Manager City of Bellevue _________________________ ________ Kurt Triplett Date City Manager City of Kirkland Approved as to Form: _________________________ ________ __________________ Denis Law Date City Attorney Mayor City of Renton _________________________ ________ Clare Donahue Date Associate Vice-President, Information Technology University of Washington 8b. - Administrative Services Department recommends approval of an addendum Page 18 of 198 Exhibit A8b . - A d m i n i s t r a t i v e S e r v i c e s D e p a r t m e n t re c o m m e n d s a p p r o v a l o f a n a d d e n d u m Pa g e 1 9 o f 1 9 8 "Exhibit B" Project Agreements 65 and 67 Splice Table Project Agreement #37 - 288 Strands Project Agreement #42 - 288 Strands Project Agreement #67 - 288 Strands Project Agreement #65 - 288 Strands Splice Case #1 Splice Case #2 Uses Splice Case#1 Splice Case #3 Owner S 7th & Talbot Road S Owner S 7th & Talbot Road S Owner S 7th & Talbot Road S S 7th & Rainier Ave S S 7th & Rainier Ave S SW Grady Way & Interurban Ave S CoR 1 CoR 1 Unterminated in vault CoR* 1 CoT* CoR 2 CoR 2 Unterminated in vault CoR 2 CoT CoR 3 CoR 3 Unterminated in vault CoR 3 CoT CoR 4 CoR 4 Unterminated in vault CoR 4 CoT CoR 5 CoR 5 Unterminated in vault CoR 5 CoT CoR 6 CoR 6 Unterminated in vault CoR 6 CoT CoR 7 CoR 7 Unterminated in vault CoR 7 CoT CoR 8 CoR 8 Unterminated in vault CoR 8 CoT CoR 9 CoR 9 Unterminated in vault CoR 9 CoT CoR 10 CoR 10 Unterminated in vault CoR 10 CoT CoR 11 CoR 11 Unterminated in vault CoR 11 CoT CoR 12 CoR 12 Unterminated in vault CoR 12 CoT CoR 13 CoR 13 Unterminated in vault CoR 13 CoT CoR 14 CoR 14 Unterminated in vault CoR 14 CoT CoR 15 CoR 15 Unterminated in vault CoR 15 CoT CoR 16 CoR 16 Unterminated in vault CoR 16 CoT CoR 17 CoR 17 Unterminated in vault CoR 17 CoT CoR 18 CoR 18 Unterminated in vault CoR 18 CoT CoR 19 CoR 19 Unterminated in vault CoR 19 CoT CoR 20 CoR 20 Unterminated in vault CoR 20 CoT CoR 21 CoR 21 Unterminated in vault CoR 21 CoT CoR 22 CoR 22 Unterminated in vault CoR 22 CoT CoR 23 CoR 23 Unterminated in vault CoR 23 CoT CoR 24 CoR 24 Unterminated in vault CoR 24 CoT CoR 25 Held in Trust 25 King County King County 25 King County CoR 26 Held in Trust 26 King County King County 26 King County CoR 27 Held in Trust 27 King County King County 27 King County CoR 28 Held in Trust 28 King County King County 28 King County CoR 29 Held in Trust 29 King County King County 29 King County CoR 30 Held in Trust 30 King County King County 30 King County CoR 31 Held in Trust 31 King County King County 31 King County CoR 32 Held in Trust 32 King County King County 32 King County CoR 33 Held in Trust 33 King County King County 33 King County CoR 34 Held in Trust 34 King County King County 34 King County 8b . - A d m i n i s t r a t i v e S e r v i c e s D e p a r t m e n t re c o m m e n d s a p p r o v a l o f a n a d d e n d u m Pa g e 2 0 o f 1 9 8 "Exhibit B" Project Agreements 65 and 67 Splice Table CoR 35 Held in Trust 35 King County King County 35 King County CoR 36 Held in Trust 36 King County King County 36 King County CoR 37 Held in Trust 37 King County King County 37 King County CoR 38 Held in Trust 38 King County King County 38 King County CoR 39 Held in Trust 39 King County King County 39 King County CoR 40 Held in Trust 40 King County King County 40 King County CoR 41 Held in Trust 41 King County King County 41 King County CoR 42 Held in Trust 42 King County King County 42 King County CoR 43 Held in Trust 43 King County King County 43 King County CoR 44 Held in Trust 44 King County King County 44 King County CoR 45 Held in Trust 45 King County King County 45 King County CoR 46 Held in Trust 46 King County King County 46 King County CoR 47 Held in Trust 47 King County King County 47 King County CoR 48 Held in Trust 48 King County King County 48 King County CoR 49 Held in Trust 49 King County King County 49 King County CoR 50 Held in Trust 50 King County King County 50 King County CoR 51 Held in Trust 51 King County King County 51 King County CoR 52 Held in Trust 52 King County King County 52 King County CoR 53 Held in Trust 53 King County King County 53 King County CoR 54 Held in Trust 54 King County King County 54 King County CoR 55 Held in Trust 55 King County King County 55 King County CoR 56 Held in Trust 56 King County King County 56 King County CoR 57 Held in Trust 57 King County King County 57 King County CoR 58 Held in Trust 58 King County King County 58 King County CoR 59 Held in Trust 59 King County King County 59 King County CoR 60 Held in Trust 60 King County King County 60 King County CoR 61 Held in Trust 61 King County King County 61 King County CoR 62 Held in Trust 62 King County King County 62 King County CoR 63 Held in Trust 63 King County King County 63 King County CoR 64 Held in Trust 64 King County King County 64 King County CoR 65 Held in Trust 65 King County King County 65 King County CoR 66 Held in Trust 66 King County King County 66 King County CoR 67 Held in Trust 67 King County King County 67 King County CoR 68 Held in Trust 68 King County King County 68 King County CoR 69 Held in Trust 69 King County King County 69 King County CoR 70 Held in Trust 70 King County King County 70 King County CoR 71 Held in Trust 71 King County King County 71 King County CoR 72 Held in Trust 72 King County King County 72 King County 8b . - A d m i n i s t r a t i v e S e r v i c e s D e p a r t m e n t re c o m m e n d s a p p r o v a l o f a n a d d e n d u m Pa g e 2 1 o f 1 9 8 "Exhibit B" Project Agreements 65 and 67 Splice Table CoB 73 CoB 73 CoB CoB 73 CoB CoB 74 CoB 74 CoB CoB 74 CoB CoB 75 CoB 75 CoB CoB 75 CoB CoB 76 CoB 76 CoB CoB 76 CoB CoB 77 CoB 77 CoB CoB 77 CoB RSD 78 CoB 78 CoB CoB 78 CoB RSD 79 CoR 79 CoR CoR 79 CoR RSD 80 CoR 80 CoR CoR 80 CoR RSD 81 Held in Trust 81 Held in Trust Held in Trust 81 Held in Trust RSD 82 Held in Trust 82 Held in Trust Held in Trust 82 Held in Trust RSD 83 Held in Trust 83 Held in Trust Held in Trust 83 Held in Trust RSD 84 Held in Trust 84 Held in Trust Held in Trust 84 Held in Trust RSD 85 Held in Trust 85 Held in Trust Held in Trust 85 Held in Trust RSD 86 Held in Trust 86 Held in Trust Held in Trust 86 Held in Trust RSD 87 Held in Trust 87 Held in Trust Held in Trust 87 Held in Trust RSD 88 Held in Trust 88 Held in Trust Held in Trust 88 Held in Trust RSD 89 Held in Trust 89 Held in Trust Held in Trust 89 Held in Trust RSD 90 Held in Trust 90 Held in Trust Held in Trust 90 Held in Trust RSD 91 Held in Trust 91 Held in Trust Held in Trust 91 Held in Trust RSD 92 Held in Trust 92 Held in Trust Held in Trust 92 Held in Trust RSD 93 Held in Trust 93 Held in Trust Held in Trust 93 Held in Trust RSD 94 Held in Trust 94 Held in Trust Held in Trust 94 Held in Trust RSD 95 Held in Trust 95 Held in Trust Held in Trust 95 Held in Trust RSD 96 Held in Trust 96 Held in Trust Held in Trust 96 Held in Trust RSD 97 Held in Trust 97 Held in Trust Held in Trust 97 Held in Trust RSD 98 Held in Trust 98 Held in Trust Held in Trust 98 Held in Trust RSD 99 Held in Trust 99 Held in Trust Held in Trust 99 Held in Trust RSD 100 Held in Trust 100 Held in Trust Held in Trust 100 Held in Trust RSD 101 Held in Trust 101 Held in Trust Held in Trust 101 Held in Trust RSD 102 Held in Trust 102 Held in Trust Held in Trust 102 Held in Trust RSD 103 Held in Trust 103 Held in Trust Held in Trust 103 Held in Trust RSD 104 Held in Trust 104 Held in Trust Held in Trust 104 Held in Trust RSD 105 Held in Trust 105 Held in Trust Held in Trust 105 Held in Trust RSD 106 Held in Trust 106 Held in Trust Held in Trust 106 Held in Trust RSD 107 Held in Trust 107 Held in Trust Held in Trust 107 Held in Trust RSD 108 Held in Trust 108 Held in Trust Held in Trust 108 Held in Trust UoW 109 UoW 109 UoW UoW 109 UoW UoW 110 UoW 110 UoW UoW 110 UoW 8b . - A d m i n i s t r a t i v e S e r v i c e s D e p a r t m e n t re c o m m e n d s a p p r o v a l o f a n a d d e n d u m Pa g e 2 2 o f 1 9 8 "Exhibit B" Project Agreements 65 and 67 Splice Table UoW 111 UoW 111 UoW UoW 111 UoW UoW 112 UoW 112 UoW UoW 112 UoW UoW 113 UoW 113 UoW UoW 113 UoW UoW 114 UoW 114 UoW UoW 114 UoW UoW 115 UoW 193 UoW 121 to 115 UoW UoW 115 UoW UoW 116 UoW 194 UoW 122 to 116 UoW UoW 116 UoW UoW 117 UoW 195 UoW 123 to 117 UoW UoW 117 UoW UoW 118 UoW 196 UoW 124 to 118 UoW UoW 118 UoW UoW 119 UoW 197 UoW 125 to 119 UoW UoW 119 UoW UoW 120 UoW 198 UoW 126 to 120 UoW UoW 120 UoW UoW 121 UoW Held in Trust 121 Held in Trust Held in Trust 121 Held in Trust UoW 122 UoW Held in Trust 122 Held in Trust Held in Trust 122 Held in Trust UoW 123 UoW Held in Trust 123 Held in Trust Held in Trust 123 Held in Trust UoW 124 UoW Held in Trust 124 Held in Trust Held in Trust 124 Held in Trust UoW 125 UoW Held in Trust 125 Held in Trust Held in Trust 125 Held in Trust UoW 126 UoW Held in Trust 126 Held in Trust Held in Trust 126 Held in Trust UoW 127 UoW 205 Held in Trust 127 Held in Trust Held in Trust 127 Held in Trust UoW 128 UoW 206 Held in Trust 128 Held in Trust Held in Trust 128 Held in Trust UoW 129 UoW 207 Held in Trust 129 Held in Trust Held in Trust 129 Held in Trust UoW 130 UoW 208 Held in Trust 130 Held in Trust Held in Trust 130 Held in Trust UoW 131 UoW 209 Held in Trust 131 Held in Trust Held in Trust 131 Held in Trust UoW 132 UoW 210 Held in Trust 132 Held in Trust Held in Trust 132 Held in Trust CoK 133 Cok 133 Cok Cok 133 Cok CoK 134 CoK 134 CoK CoK 134 CoK Held in trust 135 Held in Trust 135 Held in Trust Held in Trust 135 Held in Trust Held in trust 136 Held in Trust 136 Held in Trust Held in Trust 136 Held in Trust Held in trust 137 Held in Trust 137 Held in Trust Held in Trust 137 Held in Trust Held in trust 138 Held in Trust 138 Held in Trust Held in Trust 138 Held in Trust Held in trust 139 Held in Trust 139 Held in Trust Held in Trust 139 Held in Trust Held in trust 140 Held in Trust 140 Held in Trust Held in Trust 140 Held in Trust Held in trust 141 Held in Trust 141 Held in Trust Held in Trust 141 Held in Trust Held in trust 142 Held in Trust 142 Held in Trust Held in Trust 142 Held in Trust Held in trust 143 Held in Trust 143 Held in Trust Held in Trust 143 Held in Trust Held in trust 144 Held in Trust 144 Held in Trust Held in Trust 144 Held in Trust Held in trust 145 Held in Trust 145 Held in Trust Held in Trust 145 Held in Trust Held in trust 146 Held in Trust 146 Held in Trust Held in Trust 146 Held in Trust Held in trust 147 Held in Trust 147 Held in Trust Held in Trust 147 Held in Trust Held in trust 148 Held in Trust 148 Held in Trust Held in Trust 148 Held in Trust 8b . - A d m i n i s t r a t i v e S e r v i c e s D e p a r t m e n t re c o m m e n d s a p p r o v a l o f a n a d d e n d u m Pa g e 2 3 o f 1 9 8 "Exhibit B" Project Agreements 65 and 67 Splice Table Held in trust 149 Held in Trust 149 Held in Trust Held in Trust 149 Held in Trust Held in trust 150 Held in Trust 150 Held in Trust Held in Trust 150 Held in Trust Held in trust 151 Held in Trust 151 Held in Trust Held in Trust 151 Held in Trust Held in trust 152 Held in Trust 152 Held in Trust Held in Trust 152 Held in Trust Held in trust 153 Held in Trust 153 Held in Trust Held in Trust 153 Held in Trust Held in trust 154 Held in Trust 154 Held in Trust Held in Trust 154 Held in Trust Held in trust 155 Held in Trust 155 Held in Trust Held in Trust 155 Held in Trust Held in trust 156 Held in Trust 156 Held in Trust Held in Trust 156 Held in Trust Held in trust 157 Held in Trust 157 Held in Trust Held in Trust 157 Held in Trust Held in trust 158 Held in Trust 158 Held in Trust Held in Trust 158 Held in Trust Held in trust 159 Held in Trust 159 Held in Trust Held in Trust 159 Held in Trust Held in trust 160 Held in Trust 160 Held in Trust Held in Trust 160 Held in Trust Held in trust 161 Held in Trust 161 Held in Trust Held in Trust 161 Held in Trust Held in trust 162 Held in Trust 162 Held in Trust Held in Trust 162 Held in Trust Held in trust 163 Held in Trust 163 Held in Trust Held in Trust 163 Held in Trust Held in trust 164 Held in Trust 164 Held in Trust Held in Trust 164 Held in Trust Held in trust 165 Held in Trust 165 Held in Trust Held in Trust 165 Held in Trust Held in trust 166 Held in Trust 166 Held in Trust Held in Trust 166 Held in Trust Held in trust 167 Held in Trust 167 Held in Trust Held in Trust 167 Held in Trust Held in trust 168 Held in Trust 168 Held in Trust Held in Trust 168 Held in Trust Held in trust 169 Held in Trust 169 Held in Trust Held in Trust 169 Held in Trust Held in trust 170 Held in Trust 170 Held in Trust Held in Trust 170 Held in Trust Held in trust 171 Held in Trust 171 Held in Trust Held in Trust 171 Held in Trust Held in trust 172 Held in Trust 172 Held in Trust Held in Trust 172 Held in Trust Held in trust 173 Held in Trust 173 Held in Trust Held in Trust 173 Held in Trust Held in trust 174 Held in Trust 174 Held in Trust Held in Trust 174 Held in Trust Held in trust 175 Held in Trust 175 Held in Trust Held in Trust 175 Held in Trust Held in trust 176 Held in Trust 176 Held in Trust Held in Trust 176 Held in Trust Held in trust 177 Held in Trust 177 Held in Trust Held in Trust 177 Held in Trust Held in trust 178 Held in Trust 178 Held in Trust Held in Trust 178 Held in Trust Held in trust 179 Held in Trust 179 Held in Trust Held in Trust 179 Held in Trust Held in trust 180 Held in Trust 180 Held in Trust Held in Trust 180 Held in Trust Held in trust 181 Held in Trust 181 Held in Trust Held in Trust 181 Held in Trust Held in trust 182 Held in Trust 182 Held in Trust Held in Trust 182 Held in Trust Held in trust 183 Held in Trust 183 Held in Trust Held in Trust 183 Held in Trust Held in trust 184 Held in Trust 184 Held in Trust Held in Trust 184 Held in Trust Held in trust 185 Held in Trust 185 Held in Trust Held in Trust 185 Held in Trust Held in trust 186 Held in Trust 186 Held in Trust Held in Trust 186 Held in Trust 8b . - A d m i n i s t r a t i v e S e r v i c e s D e p a r t m e n t re c o m m e n d s a p p r o v a l o f a n a d d e n d u m Pa g e 2 4 o f 1 9 8 "Exhibit B" Project Agreements 65 and 67 Splice Table Held in trust 187 Held in Trust 187 Held in Trust Held in Trust 187 Held in Trust Held in trust 188 Held in Trust 188 Held in Trust Held in Trust 188 Held in Trust Held in trust 189 Held in Trust 189 Held in Trust Held in Trust 189 Held in Trust Held in trust 190 Held in Trust 190 Held in Trust Held in Trust 190 Held in Trust Held in trust 191 Held in Trust 191 Held in Trust Held in Trust 191 Held in Trust Held in trust 192 Held in Trust 192 Held in Trust Held in Trust 192 Held in Trust Held in trust 193 Held in Trust 193 Held in Trust Held in Trust 193 Held in Trust Held in trust 194 Held in Trust 194 Held in Trust Held in Trust 194 Held in Trust Held in trust 195 Held in Trust 195 Held in Trust Held in Trust 195 Held in Trust Held in trust 196 Held in Trust 196 Held in Trust Held in Trust 196 Held in Trust Held in trust 197 Held in Trust 197 Held in Trust Held in Trust 197 Held in Trust Held in trust 198 Held in Trust 198 Held in Trust Held in Trust 198 Held in Trust Held in trust 199 Held in Trust 199 Held in Trust Held in Trust 199 Held in Trust Held in trust 200 Held in Trust 200 Held in Trust Held in Trust 200 Held in Trust Held in trust 201 Held in Trust 201 Held in Trust Held in Trust 201 Held in Trust Held in trust 202 Held in Trust 202 Held in Trust Held in Trust 202 Held in Trust Held in trust 203 Held in Trust 203 Held in Trust Held in Trust 203 Held in Trust Held in trust 204 Held in Trust 204 Held in Trust Held in Trust 204 Held in Trust Held in trust 205 Held in Trust 205 Held in Trust Held in Trust 205 Held in Trust Held in trust 206 Held in Trust 206 Held in Trust Held in Trust 206 Held in Trust Held in trust 207 Held in Trust 207 Held in Trust Held in Trust 207 Held in Trust Held in trust 208 Held in Trust 208 Held in Trust Held in Trust 208 Held in Trust Held in trust 209 Held in Trust 209 Held in Trust Held in Trust 209 Held in Trust Held in trust 210 Held in Trust 210 Held in Trust Held in Trust 210 Held in Trust Held in trust 211 Held in Trust 211 Held in Trust Held in Trust 211 Held in Trust Held in trust 212 Held in Trust 212 Held in Trust Held in Trust 212 Held in Trust Held in trust 213 Held in Trust 213 Held in Trust Held in Trust 213 Held in Trust Held in trust 214 Held in Trust 214 Held in Trust Held in Trust 214 Held in Trust Held in trust 215 Held in Trust 215 Held in Trust Held in Trust 215 Held in Trust Held in trust 216 Held in Trust 216 Held in Trust Held in Trust 216 Held in Trust Held in trust 217 Held in Trust 217 Held in Trust Held in Trust 217 Held in Trust Held in trust 218 Held in Trust 218 Held in Trust Held in Trust 218 Held in Trust Held in trust 219 Held in Trust 219 Held in Trust Held in Trust 219 Held in Trust Held in trust 220 Held in Trust 220 Held in Trust Held in Trust 220 Held in Trust Held in trust 221 Held in Trust 221 Held in Trust Held in Trust 221 Held in Trust Held in trust 222 Held in Trust 222 Held in Trust Held in Trust 222 Held in Trust Held in trust 223 Held in Trust 223 Held in Trust Held in Trust 223 Held in Trust Held in trust 224 Held in Trust 224 Held in Trust Held in Trust 224 Held in Trust 8b . - A d m i n i s t r a t i v e S e r v i c e s D e p a r t m e n t re c o m m e n d s a p p r o v a l o f a n a d d e n d u m Pa g e 2 5 o f 1 9 8 "Exhibit B" Project Agreements 65 and 67 Splice Table Held in trust 225 Held in Trust 225 Held in Trust Held in Trust 225 Held in Trust Held in trust 226 Held in Trust 226 Held in Trust Held in Trust 226 Held in Trust Held in trust 227 Held in Trust 227 Held in Trust Held in Trust 227 Held in Trust Held in trust 228 Held in Trust 228 Held in Trust Held in Trust 228 Held in Trust Held in trust 229 Held in Trust 229 Held in Trust Held in Trust 229 Held in Trust Held in trust 230 Held in Trust 230 Held in Trust Held in Trust 230 Held in Trust Held in trust 231 Held in Trust 231 Held in Trust Held in Trust 231 Held in Trust Held in trust 232 Held in Trust 232 Held in Trust Held in Trust 232 Held in Trust Held in trust 233 Held in Trust 233 Held in Trust Held in Trust 233 Held in Trust Held in trust 234 Held in Trust 234 Held in Trust Held in Trust 234 Held in Trust Held in trust 235 Held in Trust 235 Held in Trust Held in Trust 235 Held in Trust Held in trust 236 Held in Trust 236 Held in Trust Held in Trust 236 Held in Trust Held in trust 237 Held in Trust 237 Held in Trust Held in Trust 237 Held in Trust Held in trust 238 Held in Trust 238 Held in Trust Held in Trust 238 Held in Trust Held in trust 239 Held in Trust 239 Held in Trust Held in Trust 239 Held in Trust Held in trust 240 Held in Trust 240 Held in Trust Held in Trust 240 Held in Trust Held in trust 241 Held in Trust 241 Held in Trust Held in Trust 241 Held in Trust Held in trust 242 Held in Trust 242 Held in Trust Held in Trust 242 Held in Trust Held in trust 243 Held in Trust 243 Held in Trust Held in Trust 243 Held in Trust Held in trust 244 Held in Trust 244 Held in Trust Held in Trust 244 Held in Trust Held in trust 245 Held in Trust 245 Held in Trust Held in Trust 245 Held in Trust Held in trust 246 Held in Trust 246 Held in Trust Held in Trust 246 Held in Trust Held in trust 247 Held in Trust 247 Held in Trust Held in Trust 247 Held in Trust Held in trust 248 Held in Trust 248 Held in Trust Held in Trust 248 Held in Trust Held in trust 249 Held in Trust 249 Held in Trust Held in Trust 249 Held in Trust Held in trust 250 Held in Trust 250 Held in Trust Held in Trust 250 Held in Trust Held in trust 251 Held in Trust 251 Held in Trust Held in Trust 251 Held in Trust Held in trust 252 Held in Trust 252 Held in Trust Held in Trust 252 Held in Trust Held in trust 253 Held in Trust 253 Held in Trust Held in Trust 253 Held in Trust Held in trust 254 Held in Trust 254 Held in Trust Held in Trust 254 Held in Trust Held in trust 255 Held in Trust 255 Held in Trust Held in Trust 255 Held in Trust Held in trust 256 Held in Trust 256 Held in Trust Held in Trust 256 Held in Trust Held in trust 257 Held in Trust 257 Held in Trust Held in Trust 257 Held in Trust Held in trust 258 Held in Trust 258 Held in Trust Held in Trust 258 Held in Trust Held in trust 259 Held in Trust 259 Held in Trust Held in Trust 259 Held in Trust Held in trust 260 Held in Trust 260 Held in Trust Held in Trust 260 Held in Trust Held in trust 261 Held in Trust 261 Held in Trust Held in Trust 261 Held in Trust Held in trust 262 Held in Trust 262 Held in Trust Held in Trust 262 Held in Trust 8b . - A d m i n i s t r a t i v e S e r v i c e s D e p a r t m e n t re c o m m e n d s a p p r o v a l o f a n a d d e n d u m Pa g e 2 6 o f 1 9 8 "Exhibit B" Project Agreements 65 and 67 Splice Table Held in trust 263 Held in Trust 263 Held in Trust Held in Trust 263 Held in Trust Held in trust 264 Held in Trust 264 Held in Trust Held in Trust 264 Held in Trust Held in trust 265 Held in Trust 265 Held in Trust Held in Trust 265 Held in Trust Held in trust 266 Held in Trust 266 Held in Trust Held in Trust 266 Held in Trust Held in trust 267 Held in Trust 267 Held in Trust Held in Trust 267 Held in Trust Held in trust 268 Held in Trust 268 Held in Trust Held in Trust 268 Held in Trust Held in trust 269 Held in Trust 269 Held in Trust Held in Trust 269 Held in Trust Held in trust 270 Held in Trust 270 Held in Trust Held in Trust 270 Held in Trust Held in trust 271 Held in Trust 271 Held in Trust Held in Trust 271 Held in Trust Held in trust 272 Held in Trust 272 Held in Trust Held in Trust 272 Held in Trust Held in trust 273 Held in Trust 273 Held in Trust Held in Trust 273 Held in Trust Held in trust 274 Held in Trust 274 Held in Trust Held in Trust 274 Held in Trust Held in trust 275 Held in Trust 275 Held in Trust Held in Trust 275 Held in Trust Held in trust 276 Held in Trust 276 Held in Trust Held in Trust 276 Held in Trust Held in trust 277 Held in Trust 277 Held in Trust Held in Trust 277 Held in Trust Held in trust 278 Held in Trust 278 Held in Trust Held in Trust 278 Held in Trust Held in trust 279 Held in Trust 279 Held in Trust Held in Trust 279 Held in Trust Held in trust 280 Held in Trust 280 Held in Trust Held in Trust 280 Held in Trust Held in trust 281 Held in Trust 281 Held in Trust Held in Trust 281 Held in Trust Held in trust 282 Held in Trust 282 Held in Trust Held in Trust 282 Held in Trust Held in trust 283 Held in Trust 283 Held in Trust Held in Trust 283 Held in Trust Held in trust 284 Held in Trust 284 Held in Trust Held in Trust 284 Held in Trust Held in trust 285 Held in Trust 285 Held in Trust Held in Trust 285 Held in Trust Held in trust 286 Held in Trust 286 Held in Trust Held in Trust 286 Held in Trust Held in trust 287 Held in Trust 287 Held in Trust Held in Trust 287 Held in Trust Held in trust 288 Held in Trust 288 Held in Trust Held in Trust 288 Held in Trust * The first 72 strands are owned, allocated and managed by King County Rapid Ride. 8b . - A d m i n i s t r a t i v e S e r v i c e s D e p a r t m e n t re c o m m e n d s a p p r o v a l o f a n a d d e n d u m Pa g e 2 7 o f 1 9 8 CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Subject/Title: Final approval of Latecomer Agreement request from Renton Housing Authority for watermain extension related to Glennwood Townhomes project (File: LA-11-01/PRM-27-0046) Meeting: Regular Council - 02 Dec 2013 Exhibits: Issue Paper Final Latecomer’s Agreement Final Notice Vicinity Map Final Assessment Roll Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board: Community and Economic Development Staff Contact: Abdoul Gafour, x7299 Recommended Action: Refer to the Utilities Committee Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required: $ Transfer Amendment: $ Amount Budgeted: $ Revenue Generated: $ Total Project Budget: $ City Share Total Project: $ SUMMARY OF ACTION: City Code allows the City to grant a latecomer agreement when extension of City’s utilities and related facilities are installed by a developer, in order to ensure that each property benefiting from the new utilities improvements be assessed its fair share of the costs. On December 12, 2011, Council granted preliminary approval of a latecomer agreement (LA-11-01) request to Renton Housing Authority. Following the completion of the construction of the improvements and the verification of actual costs, staff presents the latecomer agreement for final approval by Council. Renton Housing Authority has completed the installation of the agreed upon improvements and transferred title of these improvements to the City. The final authorized cost of the latecomer agreement is $214,393.00 and the preliminary cost was $224,000.00. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Grant a final 15-year latecomer agreement (LA-11-01) to Renton Housing Authority for a watermain extension related to the Glennwood Townhomes project and authorize the City Clerk to mail out notices of potential final assessment and the right to appeal to owners of benefitting properties and to finalize the latecomer agreement per City Code. 8c. - Community and Economic Development Department requests final Page 28 of 198 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT M E M O R A N D U M DATE:November 14, 2013 TO:Ed Prince, Committee Chair Members of the Utilities Committee VIA:Denis Law, Mayor FROM:Chip Vincent, CED Administrator STAFF CONTACT:Abdoul Gafour, Interim Plan Review Supervisor (x7299) SUBJECT:Latecomer Agreement LA-11-01 for Renton Housing Authority for Glennwood Townhomes Watermain Improvements ISSUE: Should Council grant final approval of a 15-year latecomer agreement (LA-11-01) to Renton Housing Authority for the installation of watermain improvements related to the Glennwood Townhomes project? RECOMMENDATION: Grant a final 15-year latecomer agreement (LA-11-01) to Renton Housing Authority for a watermain extension related to the Glennwood Townhomes project and authorize the City Clerk to mail out notices of potential final assessment and the right to appeal to owners of benefitting properties and to finalize the latecomer agreement per City Code. BACKGROUND SUMMARY: On September 21, 2011, Renton Housing Authority submitted an application for a Latecomer Agreement Request (File No. LA-11-001) related to the extension of a City water main for the Glennwood Townhomes project located at 1139 and 1147 Glennwood Ave NE. City Code (Section 9-5) allows private developers and property owners to apply for a latecomer agreement for the reimbursement of a portion of their original utility construction costs when it is deemed that the improvements can benefit adjacent properties. The costs or assessments are equitably spread on a pro rata share to the benefiting properties. On December 12, 2011, Council granted preliminary approval of the request for a latecomer’s agreement from the Renton Housing Authority for a period of two (2) years to recover a portion of the estimated cost of $224,000.00 related to the water main 8c. - Community and Economic Development Department requests final Page 29 of 198 Ed Price, Committee Chair Page 2 of 2 November 14, 2013 \AG extension along Harrington Ave NE and Glennwood Ave NE for the Glennwood Townhomes project. Prior to the installation of the watermain improvements by Renton Housing Authority, the existing 6-inch water mains in Harrington Ave NE and in Glennwood Ave NE can only provide 1,500 gallons per minute (gpm) along with low water pressure. The new improvements increase the fire flow capacity to 3,000 gpm along with higher water pressure. The recommended method of cost distribution for this latecomer agreement is based on the front-footage of properties abutting on each side of the streets where the new water main will be constructed. The assessment will be triggered when the properties within the latecomer boundary are developed or redeveloped and the development or redevelopment of said properties require a fire flow that exceeds the water system capacity of 1,500 gallons per minute before the water main improvements. The final cost of the installed improvements is $214,393.00 which is less than the preliminary estimated cost of $224,000. The total assessable front-footage is 1,510.06 feet and the assessment unit-cost is $141.98 per front-foot. There are ten properties within the latecomer agreement boundary that are subject to the potential assessment. CONCLUSION: The applicant has completed the installation of the watermain improvements and has conveyed the improvements to the City for ownership and maintenance. The applicant has met all City code requirements for the request of the final approval of the latecomer agreement. Staff recommends Council’s approval of the final 15-year latecomer agreement and final assessment roll for the Renton Housing Authority Glenn wood Townhomes project. Staff also recommends Council to authorize the City Clerk to mail out notices, to the owners of the benefitting properties, of potential final assessment and the right to appeal. Attachments cc:Denis Law, Mayor Neil Watts, Development Services Director Lys Hornsby, Utility Systems Director Tom Malphrus, Acting Utility Engineering Supervisor – Water Utility File 8c. - Community and Economic Development Department requests final Page 30 of 198 Page 1 Return Address: City Clerk’s Office City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 Title: LATECOMER’S AGREEMENT Property Tax Parcel Numbers: 722780-1325,-1330,-1265,-1370,-1365,-1360,- 1355,1670,1675 and 8143450010 to 8143450040 Project File #: PRM-27-0046, LA-11-01 Grantor(s): Grantee(s): 1. City of Renton, a Municipal Corporation Renton Housing Authority Complete legal description is in Exhibit “B” of this document. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A portion of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 9, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. in the City of Renton, King County, Washington THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into this day of , 20 , by and between the CITY OF RENTON, hereinafter referred to as “CITY,” and Renton Housing Authority, hereinafter referred to as “DEVELOPER”; WHEREAS, the “DEVELOPER” is desirous of installing certain utility or road systems and appurtenances thereto at, near, or within the herein below described property and to connect same to the “CITY’S” utility or road system(s) so that such improvements will constitute an integral part thereof; and WHEREAS, no other property owners or users are presently available to share in the cost and expense of construction of such improvements, and the parties hereto having in mind the provisions and terms of the “Municipal Water and Sewer Facilities Act” (RCW 35.91.020 et seq.) and street latecomer’s legislation (RCW 35.72.010, et seq.); and WHEREAS, the “DEVELOPER” is willing to pay all the costs and expenses for the installation of said improvements; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED AND COVENANTED BY AND BETWEEN THE AFORESAID PARTIES AS FOLLOWS: 8c. - Community and Economic Development Department requests final Page 31 of 198 PRM27-0046: RENTON HOUSING AUTHORITY GLENNWOOD TOWNHOMES LATECOMER AGREEMENT Page 2 1. The “DEVELOPER” hereby acknowledges and covenants that he is the owner of the following described property, to wit: See Exhibit “A” and the “DEVELOPER” hereby agrees and covenants to have installed the following described improvements, to wit: 1. 900 linear feet of 12-inch DI water main 2. 3 fire hydrant assemblies 3. 4 12-inch gate valves and such installation made in full compliance with all applicable codes and regulations of the “CITY”. The “DEVELOPER” further covenants and warrants that all expenses and claims in connection with the construction and installation of the aforesaid improvements, whether for labor or materials or both, have been or will be paid in full, all at the “DEVELOPER’S” expense, and the “DEVELOPER” covenants and agrees to hold the “CITY” harmless from any liability in connection therewith. 2. The “DEVELOPER” further certifies that the total cost of said construction as herein above specified is $214,393.00. The legal description of the boundary line encompassing the lands affected by this latecomer agreement is attached hereto as Exhibit “B”. The map showing in outline the land affected by such additional charges per the terms of this agreement is attached hereto as Exhibit “C”. 3. The total amount of the cost of said improvement shall be employed to determine the pro rata reimbursement to the “DEVELOPER” by any owner of real estate who did not contribute to the original cost of such improvement, and who subsequently taps into, or hooks up to, or benefits from said facilities, which tap or hookup shall include connections to lateral or branches connecting thereto, all subject to the laws and 8c. - Community and Economic Development Department requests final Page 32 of 198 PRM27-0046: RENTON HOUSING AUTHORITY GLENNWOOD TOWNHOMES LATECOMER AGREEMENT Page 3 ordinances of the “CITY” and the provisions of this agreement. The portion of total cost that may be reimbursed: $185,997.70 The method of assessment to be used: Front-footage The pro rata cost is $141.98 per front-foot Criteria for triggering of Latecomer assessment The assessment from the Latecomer Agreement will be triggered only when a property within the latecomer boundary area is developed and/or redeveloped, such that the development or redevelopment of the property requires a fire flow demand over 1,500 gallons per minutes (gpm), which is the existing water system capacity before the developer’s installed improvements. The water main improvements that were installed by the developer under this latecomer agreement will provide fire flow capacity over 1,500 gallons per minute. 4. It is hereby found and determined that the construction and installation of said aforedescribed improvement is in the public interest. 5. The “DEVELOPER” hereby agrees and covenants to convey, transfer, and assign unto the “CITY” all rights, interest and title in and to said improvements and all appurtenances and accessories thereto, free from any claim and encumbrance of any party whomsoever; “CITY” agrees to accept and maintain said improvement as part of its present system upon approval thereof by the Administrator of the Public Works Department or his/her authorized representative and after inspection of said construction. The “DEVELOPER” further agrees and covenants to execute and to deliver unto the “CITY” any and all documents including Quit Claim Deeds and Bills of Sale that may reasonably be necessary to fully vest title to the “CITY” and to effectuate this conveyance and transfer. The “DEVELOPER” further agrees and covenants to pay unto the “CITY” such service charges or other charges as may be imposed by the “CITY” for use of the improvements for which 8c. - Community and Economic Development Department requests final Page 33 of 198 PRM27-0046: RENTON HOUSING AUTHORITY GLENNWOOD TOWNHOMES LATECOMER AGREEMENT Page 4 this agreement is granted. 6. The “CITY” reserves the right, without affecting the validity or terms of this agreement, to make or cause to be made extensions to or additions of the above improvement and to allow service connections to be made to said extensions or additions, without liability on the part of the “CITY”. 7. No person, firm, or corporation shall be granted a permit to use or be authorized to tap into the facility during the period of fifteen (15) years from date hereof, without first paying unto the “CITY”, in addition to any and all other costs, fee, and charges made or assessed for each tap, or for the main facilities constructed in connection therewith, or for street, signalization, and lighting improvements, the amount required by the provisions of this contract except such charges shall not apply to any extension of the main facility. Furthermore, in case any tap, hookup, or connection is made into any such contracted facility without such payment having been first made, the legislative body of the “CITY” may cause to have removed such unauthorized tap, hookup, or connection, and all connections or related accessories located in the facility or right-of-way, and dispose of such unauthorized material so removed, without any liability on the part of the “CITY” whatsoever. It is further agreed, and covenanted that upon expiration of the terms of this agreement; to wit: fifteen (15) years from date hereof, the “CITY” shall be under no further obligation to collect or make any further sums unto the “DEVELOPER”. The decision of the Administrator of the Public Works Department or his/her authorized representative in determining or computing the amount due from any benefited owner who wishes to hookup to such improvement shall be final and conclusive in all respects. 8. It is further agreed and understood that the aforedescribed improvements to be undertaken and paid for by the “DEVELOPER” have been or are about to be connected with the utilities/transportation systems of the “CITY”, and upon such connection and 8c. - Community and Economic Development Department requests final Page 34 of 198 PRM27-0046: RENTON HOUSING AUTHORITY GLENNWOOD TOWNHOMES LATECOMER AGREEMENT Page 5 acceptance by the “CITY” through its legislative body, said extension and/or improvement shall be and become a part of the municipal utilities or transportation systems. 9. This agreement shall be placed for record with the King County Auditor’s Office within thirty (30) days of final execution of the agreement. 10. Before the “CITY” will collect any latecomer’s fee, the “DEVELOPER” will transfer title to all of the improvements under the latecomer’s agreement to the “CITY”. The “DEVELOPER” will also assign to the “CITY” the benefit and right to the latecomer’s fee should the “CITY” be unable to locate the “DEVELOPER” to tender any latecomer’s fee that the “CITY” has received. The “DEVELOPER” shall be responsible for keeping the “CITY” informed of its correct mailing address. Should the “CITY” be unable to locate the “DEVELOPER” in order to deliver a latecomer’s fee, the “CITY” shall undertake an independent investigation to determine the location of the “DEVELOPER”. Should the “CITY” after a good faith attempt to locate the “DEVELOPER” be unable to do so, then the latecomer’s fee shall be placed in the Special Deposit Fund held by the “CITY” for two (2) years. At any time within the two-year period the “DEVELOPER” may receive the latecomer’s fee, without interest, by applying to the “CITY” for that latecomer’s fee. After the expiration of the two-year period, all rights of the “DEVELOPER” to that fee shall expire, and the “CITY” shall be deemed to be the owner of those funds. 11. When the “CITY” has received the funds for a latecomer’s fee, it will forward that fee, less an administration and collection fee as described in Section 12 below, to the “DEVELOPER” within thirty (30) days of receipt of the funds. Funds received by negotiable instrument, such as a check, will be deemed received ten (10) days after delivery to the “CITY”. Should the “CITY” fail to forward the latecomer’s fee to the “DEVELOPER” through the “CITY’S” sole negligence, then the “CITY” shall pay the “DEVELOPER” interest on those monies at the rate of twelve (12%) percent per annum. 8c. - Community and Economic Development Department requests final Page 35 of 198 PRM27-0046: RENTON HOUSING AUTHORITY GLENNWOOD TOWNHOMES LATECOMER AGREEMENT Page 6 However, should the “DEVELOPER” not keep the “CITY” informed of its current correct mailing address, or should the “DEVELOPER” otherwise be negligent and thus contribute to the failure of the “CITY” to pay over the latecomer’s fee, then no interest shall accrue on late payment of the latecomer’s fee. 12. The “CITY” shall collect an administration and collection fee at the time funds are collected under this agreement. The amount of the fee retained by the “CITY” when funds are collected will be a percentage based upon the following: • If the portion of total cost that may be reimbursed is $20,000 or less, the CITY will retain a fee equal to fifteen (15%) percent of each amount collected under this agreement. • If the portion of total cost that may be reimbursed is more than $20,000 but not more than $100,000, the CITY will retain a fee equal to ten (10%) percent of each amount collected under this agreement. • If the portion of total cost that may be reimbursed is more than $100,000, the CITY will retain a fee equal to five (5%) percent of each amount collected under this agreement. 13. When authorized by the City Council, a latecomer’s agreement can be granted for a period of up to but not to exceed fifteen (15) years. No extensions will be granted beyond the period of time established by City Council. The latecomer’s agreement will expire at the end of the period of time established by the City Council. 14. By instituting the latecomer’s agreement, the “CITY” does not agree to assume any responsibility to enforce the latecomer’s agreement. The recorded latecomer agreement will be a matter of public record and will serve as a notice to the owners of the potential assessment area should connection to the improvements be made. The assessment roll 8c. - Community and Economic Development Department requests final Page 36 of 198 PRM27-0046: RENTON HOUSING AUTHORITY GLENNWOOD TOWNHOMES LATECOMER AGREEMENT Page 7 listing the affected properties and the pro -rata potential latecomer charge for each will be on file with the “CITY”. The “DEVELOPER” has responsibility to monitor those parties connecting to the improvement. Should the “CITY” become aware of such a connection it will use its best efforts to collect the latecomer’s fee, but shall not incur any liability should it inadvertently fail to collect the latecomer’s fee. 8c. - Community and Economic Development Department requests final Page 37 of 198 PRM27-0046: RENTON HOUSING AUTHORITY GLENNWOOD TOWNHOMES LATECOMER AGREEMENT Page 8 CITY OF RENTON By: Denis Law, Mayor By: Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk Notary Seal must be within box STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) On this _______ day of _____________, 20____, I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Denis Law is the person who appeared before me, and who signed this instrument, on oath stated that he was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged as the Mayor of the City of Renton to be to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary (Print)_____________________________________ My appointment expires:____________________________ Dated: 8c. - Community and Economic Development Department requests final Page 38 of 198 PRM27-0046: RENTON HOUSING AUTHORITY GLENNWOOD TOWNHOMES LATECOMER AGREEMENT Page 9 DEVELOPER By: By: INDIVIDUAL FORM OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT Notary Seal must be within box STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that ______________________ ___________________________________________ signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary (Print)_____________________________________ My appointment expires:____________________________ Dated: REPRESENTATIVE FORM OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT Notary Seal must be within box STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that ______________________ ___________________________________________ signed this instrument, on oath stated that he/she/they was/were authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the _________________________ and ____________________ of ___________________________ to be the free and voluntary act of such party/parties for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary (Print)_____________________________________ My appointment expires:____________________________ Dated: CORPORATE FORM OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT Notary Seal must be within box STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) On this _______ day of _____________, 20____, before me personally appeared to me known to be of the corporation that executed the within instrument, and acknowledge the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and each on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute said instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary (Print)_____________________________________ My appointment expires:____________________________ Dated: 8c. - Community and Economic Development Department requests final Page 39 of 198 H:\File Sys\PRM - Property Services Administration\PRM-27 - Assessment Districts From 1994 and Forward\0046\Glennwood Townhomes Latecomer\Final\Exhibit A.doc\AG EXHIBIT A Renton Housing Authority – Glennwood Townhomes Project Latecomer Agreement (PRM-27-0046/LA-11-01) Developer’s Property Legal Description: Parcel A: Lot 9, Block 42, Corrected Plat of Renton Highlands No.2, according to the plat thereof, recorded in volume 57 of Plats, pages 92 through 98, inclusive, in King County, Washington. Situate in the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 9, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. in the City of Renton, King County, Washington. And Parcel B: Lot 10, Block 42, Corrected Plat of Renton Highlands No.2, according to the plat thereof, recorded in volume 57 of Plats, pages 92 through 98, inclusive, in King County, Washington. Situate in the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 9, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. in the City of Renton, King County, Washington. 8c. - Community and Economic Development Department requests final Page 40 of 198 H:\File Sys\PRM - Property Services Administration\PRM-27 - Assessment Districts From 1994 and Forward\0046\Glennwood Townhomes Latecomer\Final\Exhibit B.doc\AG EXHIBIT B Renton Housing Authority – Glennwood Townhomes Project Latecomer Agreement (PRM-27-0046/LA-11-01) Benefitting Properties within Latecomer’s Boundary Parcel No. Legal Description King County Parcel ID 1 Lot 13, Block 41, Corrected Plat of Renton Highlands No. 2, Vol 57 pg 92 to 98 7227801325 2 Lot 14, Block 41, Corrected Plat of Renton Highlands No. 2, Vol 57 pg 92 to 98 7227801330 3 Lot 1, Block 41, Corrected Plat of Renton Highlands No. 2, Vol 57 pg 92 to 98 7227801265 4 Lot 8, Block 42, Corrected Plat of Renton Highlands No. 2, Vol 57 pg 92 to 98 7227801370 5 Lot 7, Block 42, Corrected Plat of Renton Highlands No. 2, Vol 57 pg 92 to 98 7227801365 6 Lot 6, Block 42, Corrected Plat of Renton Highlands No. 2, Vol 57 pg 92 to 98 7227801360 7 Lots 4 & 5, Block 42, Corrected Plat of Renton Highlands No. 2, Vol 57 pg 92 to 98 7227801355 8 Sunset North Condominium, Vol 147 pg 64-65 Condominiums Plats 8143450010 to 8143450040 9 Lot 21, Block 46, Corrected Plat of Renton Highlands No. 2, Vol 57 pg 92 to 98 7227801670 10 Lot 22, Block 46, Corrected Plat of Renton Highlands No. 2, Vol 57 pg 92 to 98 7227801675 8c. - Community and Economic Development Department requests final Page 41 of 198 EXHIBIT C 8c. - Community and Economic Development Department requests final Page 42 of 198 \AG CITY OF RENTON NOTICE OF POTENTIAL FINAL ASSESSMENT LA-11-001, PRM-27-0046 Private Developer Held Latecomer Agreement (FINAL NOTICE) Mailed: Month/Day/2013 The Final Assessment of the Latecomer’s Agreement does not create a lien on your property and is not a charge against your property until the property connects to or gains benefit from the new water mains. <Name >Potential Final Assessment: <$ Amount> <Secondary name>Total Front Footage Assessed: <footage> feet <Street address>Assessment cost per front-foot: $141.98 <City, State Zip code) King County Property Identification No. <PID> On January 5, 2012, Bonnie I. Walton, the City Clerk of Renton, Washington, acting on behalf of Renton Housing Authority, as the owner/developer of certain water mains and related facilities that were installed to serve its property known at the Glennwood Townhomes, mailed you a notice of potential assessment. These facilities are covered by Latecomer Agreement LA-11-001/ PRM-27-0046 and are eligible for cost recovery for the installation of 900 lineal feet of 12-inch water main, 4 fire hydrants and related appurtenances. In August 2012, the facilities were completed and the final costs for the facilities were distributed among the benefiting properties. The costs will become payable by the future user(s) upon issuance of a City permit authorizing the future user(s) to construct improvements on their properties that would derive direct benefit from the installed facilities. It is the intent of this notice to inform you that your property has been included in the latecomer recovery boundary and your potential final assessment is shown above. A map of the latecomer boundary is attached with this notice. Criteria for Triggering the Latecomer Charges: The assessment from the Latecomer Agreement will be triggered only when a property within the latecomer boundary area is developed and/or redeveloped, such that the development or redevelopment of the property requires a fire flow demand over 1,500 gallons per minutes (gpm), which is the existing water system capacity before the developer’s installed improvements. The water main improvements that were installed by the developer under this latecomer agreement will provide fire flow capacity over 1,500 gallons per minute. Therefore, any property that is developing or redeveloping and benefits from the additional fire flow capacity created by Renton Housing Authority’s water main improvements shall be subject to this Latecomer Charge whether or not a physical connection is made to the improvements. 8c. - Community and Economic Development Department requests final Page 43 of 198 \AG Per Renton Municipal Code (RMC) Section 9-5-5, you may request an appeal hearing by writing to the Renton City Council, c/o City Clerk, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055, within twenty (20) days of this (final) mailing or by Month Day, 2013. Grounds for protest: An appeal shall include a statement of claimed errors that concern the proposed assessment and must be accompanied by a $75.00 nonrefundable fee. Errors which are not set forth in writing will not be considered. Pursuant to RMC Section 9-5-5.C, the only items of appeal that will be considered are the cost of the facilities, the costs distribution methodology and the issue of benefit to the properties to be assessed. These three (3) allowable items of appeal are further defined on the attached citizen hand- out. Appeal Fee and Appeal Process: A nonrefundable appeal fee in the amount of $75.00 shall be submitted with each appeal. If a protest is received and deemed timely and establishes a proper ground for protest according to City Ordinance, a public hearing will be held. You will be notified in advance of the public hearing so that you or your representative may attend. If no protests are received, the above quoted assessment will be recorded against your property. The assessment will not be collected until you subsequently tap onto or use the facilities covered by the latecomer agreement. Bonnie Walton, CMC, City Clerk 8c. - Community and Economic Development Department requests final Page 44 of 198 VICINITY MAP 8c. - Community and Economic Development Department requests final Page 45 of 198 CITY OF RENTON FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL RENTON HOUSING AUTHORITY GLENNWOOD TOWNHOMES LATECOMER AGREEMENT FOR WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS LA-11-01/PRM-27-0046 Type of Improvements:Water Main Extension Final Total Latecomer Assessment Amount: $214,393.00 Total Assessable front foot 1510.06 front-feet Final Assessment Cost/front-foot $141.98 Property Identification Name/Address of Owner Total Front-Foot Final Assessment \AG Page 1 of 3 Parcel # 1 ROGER W THOMAS 11325-162nd AVE SE RENTON WA 98059 70.00 $9,938.35 KC Tax Act #7227801325 Legal Description:Lot 13, Block 41, Corrected Plat of Renton Highlands No. 2, Vol 57 pg 92 to 98 Parcel # 2 SHARON A BARKER 15718-SE 143RD ST RENTON WA 98059 94.00 $13,345.79 KC Tax Act #7227801330 Legal Description:Lot 14, Block 41, Corrected Plat of Renton Highlands No. 2, Vol 57 pg 92 to 98 Parcel # 3 ALEX ANDERSEN E P.O. BOX 441 MILTON WA 98354 226.44 $32,149.15 KC Tax Act #7227801265 Legal Description:Lot 1, Block 41, Corrected Plat of Renton Highlands No. 2, Vol 57 pg 92 to 98 Parcel # 4 LINDA C PERRINE 306 SENECA AVE N RENTON WA 98057 85.75 $12,174.48 KC Tax Act #7227801370 Legal Description:Lot 8, Block 42, Corrected Plat of Renton Highlands No. 2, Vol 57 pg 92 to 98 Parcel # 5 KARSON CHEUNG & SANDY B VUONG 1159 GLENNWOOD AVE NE RENTON WA 98056 73.15 $10,385.58 KC Tax Act #7227801365 Legal Description:Lot 7, Block 42, Corrected Plat of Renton Highlands No. 2, Vol 57 pg 92 to 98 8c. - Community and Economic Development Department requests final Page 46 of 198 CITY OF RENTON FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL RENTON HOUSING AUTHORITY GLENNWOOD TOWNHOMES LATECOMER AGREEMENT FOR WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS LA-11-01/PRM-27-0046 Type of Improvements:Water Main Extension Final Total Latecomer Assessment Amount: $214,393.00 Total Assessable front foot 1510.06 front-feet Final Assessment Cost/front-foot $141.98 Property Identification Name/Address of Owner Total Front-Foot Final Assessment \AG Page 2 of 3 Parcel # 6 BRIAN UNSDERFER & GLORIA RAMI 1100-106TH AVE NE #802 BELLEVUE WA 98004 83.00 11,784.05 KC Tax Act #7227801360 Legal Description:Lot 6, Block 42, Corrected Plat of Renton Highlands No. 2, Vol 57 pg 92 to 98 Parcel # 7 CARLTON VISTA LLC 2103 LAKESHORE DR MANSON WA 98831 334.41 $47,478.35 KC Tax Act #7227801355 Legal Description:Lots 4 & 5, Block 42, Corrected Plat of Renton Highlands No. 2, Vol 57 pg 92 to 98 Parcel # 8 SUNSET NORTH CONDOMINIUM HOA 1159 HARRINGTON AVE NE RENTON WA 98056 98.87 $14,037.21 KC Tax Act #8143450010 to 8143450040 Legal Description:Sunset North Condominium, Vol 147 pg 64-65 Condominiums Plats Parcel # 9 ANNMARIELINN LLC 19244 - 39TH AVE S SEATAC WA 98188 128.44 $19,052.59 KC Tax Act #7227801670 Legal Description:Lot 21, Block 46, Corrected Plat of Renton Highlands No. 2, Vol 57 pg 92 to 98 Parcel # 10 RONALD J & SHARON GOODMAN 2916-91ST AVE E. PUYALLUP WA 98371 116.00 $16,469.27 KC Tax Act #7227801675 Legal Description:Lot 22, Block 46, Corrected Plat of Renton Highlands No. 2, Vol 57 pg 92 to 98 8c. - Community and Economic Development Department requests final Page 47 of 198 CITY OF RENTON FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL RENTON HOUSING AUTHORITY GLENNWOOD TOWNHOMES LATECOMER AGREEMENT FOR WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS LA-11-01/PRM-27-0046 Type of Improvements:Water Main Extension Final Total Latecomer Assessment Amount: $214,393.00 Total Assessable front foot 1510.06 front-feet Final Assessment Cost/front-foot $141.98 Property Identification Name/Address of Owner Total Front-Foot Final Assessment \AG Page 3 of 3 Developer’s Parcel RENTON HOUSING AUTHORITY P.O. BOX 2316 RENTON WA 98056 96.00 $13,629.74 KC Tax Act #7227801375 Legal Description:Lot 9, Block 42, Corrected Plat of Renton Highlands No. 2, Vol 57 pg 92 to 98 Developer’s Parcel RENTON HOUSING AUTHORITY P.O. BOX 2316 RENTON WA 98056 104.00 $14,765.55 KC Tax Act #7227801380 Legal Description:Lot 10, Block 42, Corrected Plat of Renton Highlands No. 2, Vol 57 pg 92 to 98 8c. - Community and Economic Development Department requests final Page 48 of 198 CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Subject/Title: SW 27th Street/Strander Blvd. Extension Project Phase 1, Segment 2A, Supplemental to CAG-09-077 by BergerABAM Engineers, Inc. Meeting: Regular Council - 02 Dec 2013 Exhibits: Supplemental Agreement Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board: Public Works Staff Contact: Keith Woolley, Transportation Design Project Manager, x7318 Recommended Action: Refer to Transportation/Aviation Committee Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required: $ 334,791 Transfer Amendment: $ Amount Budgeted: $ 8,222,575 (2013)Revenue Generated: $ Total Project Budget: $ 19,136,777 (Phase 1, Seg 2A)City Share Total Project: $ SUMMARY OF ACTION: This supplemental agreement provides additional construction administration and inspection (CA&I) services and design construction support services (DCSS) for the SW 27th Street/Strander Blvd. Extension Project, Phase 1, Segment 2A. This supplemental agreement funds approximately four full-time consultant positions and associated sub-consultants to administer the construction of the project for an additional four months. Funds originally budgeted for the last four months of construction were expended when the contractor received permission from BNSF and proceeded to work during the holiday shutdown periods in 2012 and 2013. Additionally, execution and administration of the project require the additional four months due to project challenges and delays encountered during the dewatering and tieback installation phases of the project. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the supplemental agreement with BergerABAM Engineers, Inc., in the amount of $334,791 for additional construction administration and inspection and design construction support services on the SW 27th Street/Strander Blvd. Extension Project. 8d. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of Supplemental Page 49 of 198 Section IV, TIME FOR BEGINNING AND COMPLETION, is amended to change the number of calendar days for completion of the work to read: Section 1, SCOPE OF WORK, is hereby changed to read: DOT Form 140-063 EF Revised 9/2005 If you concur with this supplement and agree to the changes as stated above, please sign in the appropriate spaces below and return to this office for final action. By: Consultant Signature By: I Section V, PAYMENT, shall be amended as follows: BergerABAM Inc.City of Renton Supplemental Agreement Number Organization and Address Project Number Description of Work BergerABAM Inc. 33301 Ninth Avenue S., Suite 300 Federal Way, WA 98003 The purpose of Supplement No. 7 is for additional construction administration to cover project delays. All provisions in the basic agreement remain in effect except as expressly modified by this supplement. and executed on The Local Agency of desires to supplement the agreement entered into with See Exhibit A-1. Extend contract completion date to 12/31/14. See Exhibits E-1 and G-1. 4,292,191.00 as set forth in the attached Exhibit A, and by this reference made a part of this supplement. Strander Boulevard/Southwest 27th Street East Project Title New Maximum Amount Payable Original Agreement Number CAG-09-077 206-431-2300Phone: City of Renton BergerABAM Inc. 4/17/2009 CAG-09-077and identified as Agreement No. $ The changes to the agreement are described as follows: II III Approving Authority Signature 7 Date 4/17/2009 12/31/2014 Execution Date Completion Date 8d. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of Supplemental Page 50 of 198 City of Renton, Construction Support, Admin, and Inspection Services BergerABAM, A12.0141.00 Strander Boulevard Extension Project November 2013 Renton, Washington Exhibit A-1 Page 1 EXHIBIT A-1 (SUPPLEMENT NO. 7) SCOPE OF WORK – CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION AND INSPECTION PLUS DESIGN CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT SERVICES PROJECT NO. CAG-09-077 INTRODUCTION The City of Renton (CITY) has executed Consultant Agreement CAG-09-077, and subsequent supplements, with BergerABAM Inc. (CONSULTANT) to develop this grade separation project, which includes a bridge structure that will carry the Burlington Northern/Santa Fe (BNSF) railroad tracks over a new Strander Boulevard. Strander Boulevard, which is to be constructed under Phase 1, Segment 2A (this project), is a two-lane roadway that connects Southwest 27th Street to the east to the future Sounder Tukwila Station parking lot. The two-lane roadway also provides a segment of the future eastbound four-lane Strander Boulevard. The project has experienced delays, but is still scheduled for completion in April 2014. However the Contractor worked through the duration of the 2012 BNSF Moratorium and is currently working through the 2013 BNSF Moratorium to mitigate project delays. The original staffing calendar used to prepare the fee estimate for the construction administration and inspection did not account for work during the BNSF Moratorium. During these time frames, the staffing calendar listed staff on site but for a reduced duration. Due to the addition of work in both moratoriums, the current fee will be depleted in December 2013. This supplement provides for Construction Administration and Inspection (CA&I) Services and Design Construction Support Services (DCSS) from mid December 2013 through April 2014, with closeout anticipated in May 2014. SCOPE OF WORK - CONSTRUCTION ADMINSTRATION AND INSPECTION (CA&I) SERVICES General 1. Contract administration duties will be provided up to the Contract Completion Date to facilitate close out of the project. 2. The CONSULTANT will assist the CITY in preparing contract documentation, data, and reports required by Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) for receiving Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) funding. 3. The CONSULTANT will provide computers, copiers, fax, and other miscellaneous office equipment and supplies required for both the CONSULTANT and CITY staff. 4. The CONSULTANT shall provide materials testing services and special inspections through Mayes Testing Engineers. 5. The CONSULTANT will provide all environmental services through subconsultant Widener & Associates. 6. The CITY will provide all public notice/involvement services required, including notices regarding the closure of streets and other CITY facilities affected by the project. The CITY 8d. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of Supplemental Page 51 of 198 City of Renton, Construction Support, Admin, and Inspection Services BergerABAM, A12.0141.00 Strander Boulevard Extension Project November 2013 Renton, Washington Exhibit A-1 Page 2 will take the lead in informing appropriate public interests on the progress of the project. Therefore, no efforts and/or costs for public involvement services are included in the fee estimate. 7. No efforts and/or costs are included in this proposal to accommodate discovery, testing, and/or disposal of hazardous materials from the site. CA&I Staffing Under these services, the CONSULTANT will provide staff for the following positions at the construction site. More detailed descriptions of the duties of these staff are described in the following section. 1. Resident Engineer - The Resident Engineer will be full time and will be experienced in construction administration and inspection procedures on large federally funded projects to oversee all activities on the project site. 2. Office Engineer - The CONSULTANT shall provide a part-time Office Engineer to assist the Resident Engineer with evaluation of Contractor requests for compensation, schedule review and analysis, claims analysis, and assisting with progress payments. 3. Structures Inspector - The Structures Inspector will inspect sheet pile shoring, ground anchor installations, reinforced concrete retaining walls and the BNSF Bridge foundations, abutments, piers, and superstructure on the project. The Structures Inspector will coordinate with the Resident Engineer or Assistant Resident Engineer/Office Engineer in scheduling subconsultant structural inspections. 4. Document Control Technician/Assistant Inspector - The Document Control Specialist/ Assistant Inspector will be experienced in federally funded projects to organize and maintain all project records and materials documentation in accordance with FHWA/WSDOT requirements. This position will also assist with any supplemental inspection needs. Also under these services, the CITY will provide staff for the following positions at the construction site. 1. Earthwork, Roadway, and Utilities Inspector - The Earthwork, Roadway, and Utilities Inspector will be responsible for inspection and documentation of all civil work. Job Descriptions for, Duties of, and Prospective CA&I Staff More detailed job descriptions, duties, and prospective personnel for each of the key positions are described below. Resident Engineer Ed Cline - BergerABAM Position reports to City of Renton (Bob Hansen) and BergerABAM (Bob Fernandes) 8d. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of Supplemental Page 52 of 198 City of Renton, Construction Support, Admin, and Inspection Services BergerABAM, A12.0141.00 Strander Boulevard Extension Project November 2013 Renton, Washington Exhibit A-1 Page 3 Job Description: The resident engineer supervises the inspection team, materials approval engineer, assistant resident engineer/office engineer, and document control specialist. The resident engineer is responsible for the daily operations and functions of the field and office staff for the Strander Boulevard/Southwest 27th Street Extension - Phase 1, Segment 2A. The resident engineer will work closely with the City of Renton to keep the CITY informed of the progress of the project in regards to scope, schedule, and budget. The resident engineer will be the main contact for CITY. It will be the responsibility of this position to ensure that project staff is trained and aware of elements of construction inspection, project documentation, and materials testing in accordance with the WSDOT Construction Manual, WSDOT Standard Specifications, and Local Agency Guidelines. Duties include  Review and evaluate construction documents  Establish construction administration tasks  Oversee construction contract administration and field inspections  Oversee the materials documentation filing system in conjunction with the document control specialist and materials approval engineer. This will include training and overseeing office engineering staff in updating the ROM, at a minimum, of a weekly basis; processing/distributing and filing QPLs, ensuring also that approval codes are acted upon; using the WSDOT on-line aggregate source approval database; processing RAMs for signature and distribution; and final processing and filing of certs, CMOs, materials inspection reports, field density reports, concrete test reports, HMA gradation test reports, HMA density reports, approved for shipment documentation, and all other information regarding materials  Supervise field staff in practices and procedures of codes, regulations, federal, state, and local contract requirements; oversee contract compliance  Facilitate weekly (or periodic) construction meetings  Supervise construction project inspection  Oversee correspondence, records, and change orders during construction of the project  Supervise staff to ensure adequacy of field project notes and monthly estimates for progress payments  Act as a resource and lead with federal and state auditors ensuring appropriate contract compliance 8d. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of Supplemental Page 53 of 198 City of Renton, Construction Support, Admin, and Inspection Services BergerABAM, A12.0141.00 Strander Boulevard Extension Project November 2013 Renton, Washington Exhibit A-1 Page 4  Supervise subordinate teams of staff  Provide and/or arrange for staff training  Ensure personal protective equipment is available in the job site office  Ensure inspection staff is provided with appropriate inspection equipment and/or tools for job site inspection  Draft or delegate drafting of serial letters to the contractor  If the contractor requests additional compensation for any item, the resident engineer will determine merit. If merit is warranted, then the resident engineer will evaluate any cost and/or schedule impacts, and review response with CITY staff  Oversee the drafting of change orders  Facilitate and/or lead change order negotiations with the Contractor. The negotiations will be done in conjunction with the CITY representative or other CITY officials with signatory authority  Supervise and guide office staff in initial setup of project files, documentation flow, and computer systems  Ensure that design team support staff is notified promptly of potential field design revisions and/or changes. Supervise and oversee office staff personnel in routing RFIs, shop drawings, and other information to design team support staff  Provide coordination for material testing in accordance with WSDOT and FHWA requirements. This will also include coordination with items inspected by WSDOT fabrication inspectors  Other duties as assigned Office Engineer Shawna Lawrence – BergerABAM Position Reports to Resident Engineer Job Description: Office Engineer will assist the Resident Engineer with evaluation of Contractor requests for compensation, schedule review and analysis, claims analysis and assisting with progress payments. Structures Inspector Mike Niehl – BergerABAM Position Reports to Resident Engineer 8d. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of Supplemental Page 54 of 198 City of Renton, Construction Support, Admin, and Inspection Services BergerABAM, A12.0141.00 Strander Boulevard Extension Project November 2013 Renton, Washington Exhibit A-1 Page 5 This position will assume the day-to-day inspection activities for sheet pile shoring, ground anchors, reinforced concrete retaining walls, and on-site BNSF Bridge construction. He will work with the resident engineer in coordinating all subconsultant inspections assigned to the Strander Boulevard/Southwest 27th Street Extension - Phase 1, Segment 2A project. Duties include  Participate in inspection of structural elements of the project  Complete and/or review field note records for payment. Ensure items for payment have complete documentation prior to payment. This includes materials documentation, such as RAMs, certs, samples, and approved for tags or other. For QPL items, ensure that approval code action is completed  Take preconstruction photographs and/or videos, periodic photo records during construction, and post-construction project photos (digital photos, minimum resolution of 2 mega pixels)  Provide inspection records, including a record of field changes for use in preparing re cord drawings as described below  Coordinate scheduling of materials testing lab personnel with the resident engineer  Serve as structural inspector and assign duties to assistant inspector(s) if applicable  Coordinate scheduling of geotechnical inspector, as needed, with the resident engineer to document activities, such as driven steel piles, sheet pile installation, ground anchor installation, and other elements of work as needed  Be first level to resolve field disputes with contractors  Evaluate issues of concern and develop corrective actions based on the Contract  Other duties as assigned Document Control Specialist/Assistant Inspector Dana Salyer – BergerABAM Position Reports to Resident Engineer The document control specialist will work under the direction of the resident engineer at a construction site field office in the collection, logging, distribution, and processing of all incoming and outgoing office correspondence. This position will assist the resident engineer in updating and keeping current the project filing system, including materials documentation system. The position will compute and/or check field note records for payment and enter into the project ledger. The document control specialist will assist the resident engineer to ensure that all applicable materials documentation for each bid item within a progress payment is 8d. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of Supplemental Page 55 of 198 City of Renton, Construction Support, Admin, and Inspection Services BergerABAM, A12.0141.00 Strander Boulevard Extension Project November 2013 Renton, Washington Exhibit A-1 Page 6 received prior to payment for the individual bid items. All EEO documentation, including required forms to be submitted by the Contractor, will be processed and tracked by this position; this will also include checking payrolls for compliance to Contract requirements. As the need arises, document control specialist may be assigned to construction inspection duties as an assistant to construction inspectors. This will involve assisting in the inspection of all project elements, including but not limited to TESC measures, grading operations (shoofly), structural elements of the project, pile driving operations, sheet pile wall and ground anchor installations, drainage, bridge substructure and superstructure, and other miscellaneous construction features. Duties include  Assist the assistant resident engineer and materials documentation engineer with elements of the materials documentation system as requested  Assist the resident engineer in computing and/or checking field note records, collecting/computing and/or checking totals of item quantity tickets, entering pay information into the project ledger or checking information entered into project ledger, and running monthly pay estimates. Check progress estimates for accuracy, completeness, and then submit to the resident engineer for review with the Contractor. After review, make any revisions and submit to the resident engineer for final reviews and processing  Assist the resident engineer in filing all field note records submitted for monthly progress payments into the office field note record books. File and reference all item quantity tickets and any backup tickets for neat line items in the office file cabinet or storage boxes. Check to ensure that all items paid by neat line that require cross section and end area information and calculations are submitted with such. File and reference all backup information in the project files or backup boxes  Assist the resident engineer in the processing of force account bid items. This includes contractor and subcontractor personnel weighted wage rates, contractor and subcontractor equipment rates, and all backup information to determine the rates. Complete the calculation portion of the inspector’s daily report of force account. This will include entering the weighted wage rates and equipment rates, then totaling and applying applicable markups to determine total compensation in accordance with WSDOT Standard Specification 1-09.6. Maintain all backup information for payment of force account items  Assist the resident engineer in collecting, compiling, packaging, distributing, and filing all change order backup information, including, but not limited to, serial letters, e-mails, verbal and/or written approvals to proceed, independent estimates, and any other backup to be included in each change order file  Attend meetings as requested by the resident engineer 8d. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of Supplemental Page 56 of 198 City of Renton, Construction Support, Admin, and Inspection Services BergerABAM, A12.0141.00 Strander Boulevard Extension Project November 2013 Renton, Washington Exhibit A-1 Page 7  Assist the resident engineer to ensure that all required contract forms and/or reports are received from the contractor in a timely manner, processed, and filed. These include, but are not limited to, Apprentice Utilization Plan, Statement of Apprentice Journeyman Participation, Quarterly Report of Amounts Paid to DBE, Annual EEO Report, monthly Utilization Report, Request to Sublet, and Notice of Intent to Pay Prevailing Wage  Process training plan, trainee requests, and payment of training if applicable to the project  Check weekly payrolls for prime contractor and all subcontractors to ensure applicable contract prevailing wage rates and benefits are paid. Compare to employee interview reports to ensure contractor field staff is being paid in accordance with the contract  Update and keep the project files, as new correspondence is received, current on a daily basis  Assist the resident engineer in the processing of incoming and outgoing correspondence, such as serial letters, transmittals, submittals, materials information, shop drawings, catalogue cuts, and miscellaneous documentation. This will include date stamping, logging information into an Excel spreadsheet for tracking, distributing copies for routing, and ensuring copies are placed in the project files  Attend preconstruction and weekly construction meetings to record and transcribe meeting minutes and distribute to attendees for comment  Assist field inspectors in conducting or conduct Employee Wage Rate interviews and DBE on-site reviews  Arrange meetings and schedule appointments, as necessary; prepare in computer format (PowerPoint)  Distribute office mail, draft and prepare written correspondence, and review routine invoices for payment  Answer and handle telephone calls and route to appropriate individual or take detailed messages  Make copies of project documentation and/or scan information for distribution and electronic filing  Assist project inspectors in as needed  Other duties as assigned Earthwork, Roadway, Utilities Inspector (Civil Work) Ken Sandberg - City of Renton Position Reports to Resident Engineer 8d. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of Supplemental Page 57 of 198 City of Renton, Construction Support, Admin, and Inspection Services BergerABAM, A12.0141.00 Strander Boulevard Extension Project November 2013 Renton, Washington Exhibit A-1 Page 8 This position will assume the day-to-day inspection activities for all nonstructural construction activities. This will include, but not be limited to, inspection of Contractor’s TESC operations, clearing and grubbing, preparation activities, grading operations, shoofly and roadway embankment construction, roadway excavation, drainage and pond installation, illumination system construction, surfacing, paving, striping and signing. He will work with the resident engineer in coordinating all subconsultant inspections assigned to the Strander Boulevard/Southwest 27th Street Extension - Phase 1, Segment 2A project. The position requires the ability to work in a team environment, provide solutions to construction field issues, and be able to clearly articulate both orally and in writing. Duties include  Complete and/or review field note records for payment. Ensure items for payment have complete documentation prior to payment. This includes materials documentation such as RAMs, certs, samples, and approved for tags or other. For QPL items, ensure that approval code action is completed  Take preconstruction photographs and/or videos, periodic photo records during construction, and post-construction project photos (digital photos, minimum resolution of 2 mega pixels)  Provide inspection records, including a record of field changes for use in preparing record drawings as described below  Coordinate scheduling of materials testing lab personnel with the resident engineer  Serve as civil inspector and assign duties to assistant inspector(s) if applicable  Coordinate scheduling of geotechnical inspector, as needed, with the resident engineer to document activities, such as shoofly embankment inspections, subgrade inspections, dewatering operations monitoring, and other elements of work as needed  Be first level to resolve field disputes with contractors  Evaluate issues of concern and develop corrective actions based on the contract  Other duties as assigned Schedule for CA&I Services The accompanying fee estimate is based on an estimated completion date of April 1, 2014 based on the calendar for involvement of the above staff as a fraction of available time in accordance with the current estimated completion date. The calendar is included with Exhibit E-1. It is recognized by both parties that this schedule is estimated and that the Contractor’s schedule will become the “real” schedule against which staffing plans must be made. 8d. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of Supplemental Page 58 of 198 City of Renton, Construction Support, Admin, and Inspection Services BergerABAM, A12.0141.00 Strander Boulevard Extension Project November 2013 Renton, Washington Exhibit A-1 Page 9 Key assumed milestones in this estimated Construction Time Estimate are as follows. Physical Completion 1 April 2014 Contract Completion – Close Out May 2014 Budget for CA&I Services Field Office Equipment and Supplies Field office equipment includes computers, printer, faxes, copiers, and phones, including cell phones. Allowances have been established for the purpose of acquiring these items and/or covering monthly expenses associated with their use. The actual monthly expenses will be invoiced. The actual cost to purchase the equipment shall also be invoiced. Vehicles and Mileage CONSULTANT field staff shall be compensated for mileage to and from the permanent duty station (Federal Way Office) to the site. CONSULTANT field staff shall be compensated for mileage for travel at the site. Travel expenses for part-time and temporary inspection services, as well as for project meetings attended by engineer support staff of the CONSULTANT and its Subconsultants, shall be invoiced on the basis of mileage. SCOPE OF SERVICES – DESIGN CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT SERVICES (DCSS) DCSS provides continuity of the design team through the construction process. Services to be provided by the CONSULTANT during construction will include shop drawing review, submittal review, and responses to Contractor requests for information. Services may also include adjustments to the project design to work around unforeseen site conditions. Services will also include site visits, attendance at project meetings, design-team inspections, and preparation of record drawings. Under DCSS, five basic tasks will be provided as follows. DCSS Task 1 – Project Administration, Permitting Support, and Meetings The CONSULTANT will attend project site meetings as necessary. The CONSULTANT shall also prepare monthly invoices for the CONSULTANT’s services that include a brief description of services provided during the month. Invoices will be based on the task descriptions contained in this scope of work. Deliverable(s)  Monthly CONSULTANT invoices and progress reports DCSS Task 2 – Requests for Information (RFIs) and Submittal Review The CONSULTANT will respond to questions and RFIs by the Contractor and shall review Contractor submittals as assigned by the CONSULTANT CA&I staff. Assumed submittal items are as indicated in the accompanying fee estimate. Deliverable(s)  Responses to CONSULTANT CA&I staff to support RFIs, as required 8d. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of Supplemental Page 59 of 198 City of Renton, Construction Support, Admin, and Inspection Services BergerABAM, A12.0141.00 Strander Boulevard Extension Project November 2013 Renton, Washington Exhibit A-1 Page 10 DCSS Task 3– Change Orders The CONSULTANT shall provide revised plans and specifications as required to execute change orders. Deliverable(s)  Revised plans and specifications will be provided, as required DCSS Task 4 – Inspections BergerABAM design staff and railroad, geotechnical, pump station electrical, illumination, and environmental subconsultant design staff will provide part-time inspections on an as-needed or as-desired basis. Possible specialized inspection services may include the following.  Geotechnical observation for the installation of driven bridge foundation piles, sheet piles, and tieback anchors. It is assumed that this will be a part-time effort for each operation.  Geotechnical observation and evaluation of shoofly embankment subgrade preparation, shoofly embankment construction, and evaluation of settlement monitoring information  Geotechnical observation and evaluation of the Contractors dewatering system installation and subsequent operation  Geotechnical observation and evaluation of subgrade beneath the Strander Roadway  Geotechnical observation and evaluation of “final” groundwater control system  Structural inspections for BNSF Railroad Bridge components and shoofly embankments  Special inspections of pump station electrical  Special inspections of pump station mechanical  Special inspections for pump station building structural  Provide materials testing and special inspections of structures  Assist the project engineer in staking and verifying the wetland boundary on the ground prior to the contractor beginning work on the project  Provide permit modification support as needed during construction. The work includes possible modifications proposed by the contractor, such as work window extensions and design changes. The work will only be performed if changes are needed during construction  Provide biological assessment updates and consultation assistance for Section Seven of the Endangered Species Act 8d. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of Supplemental Page 60 of 198 City of Renton, Construction Support, Admin, and Inspection Services BergerABAM, A12.0141.00 Strander Boulevard Extension Project November 2013 Renton, Washington Exhibit A-1 Page 11  Provide weekly assistance in NPDES inspections with the Contractor to ensure compliance with the NPDES permit and Section 401 water quality certification. Deliverable(s)  CONSULTANT staff will provide daily inspection reports whenever on site to conduct these inspections. DCSS Task 5 – Record Drawings The CONSULTANT shall prepare a record set of drawings for the CITY that reflect field changes (additions, modifications, or deletions) to the bid drawing set during construction. The record drawing set shall include any drawings revised or reissued during construction as a result of change orders and shall include changes resulting from RFI responses. The basis for the record drawings shall be a set of bid drawings redlined with changes by the CITY and supplied to the CONSULTANT. These drawings shall be noted as “record drawings” in the drawing revision block, but shall not require seals or signatures of registered professionals. The intent of the record drawing set is to provide the best information available to capture significant field changes, but not necessarily every minor change that may occur. Deliverable(s)  One set of 11 x 17 final record drawings  One electronic set in AutoCAD format  One set of 22 X 34 final record drawings on mylar. SUBCONSULTANTS These construction support services include services provided by the following subconsultants.  Shannon & Wilson – Geotechnical  Hanson Professional services – Railroad  RH2 Engineering – Pump Station Electrical  BCE Engineers – Illumination  Perteet Engineering – Survey Control/Survey QA  Mayes Testing – Material Testing and Inspection Services  Widener & Associates – Environmental/Permit Services 8d. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of Supplemental Page 61 of 198 EXHIBIT E-1 CONSULTANT FEE DETERMINATION CA plus DCSS Costs 11/19/2013 Construction Administration and Inspection (CA&I) Supplement DIRECT SALARY COSTS (DSC) for BergerABAM Personnel Hours Rate Cost 1 Project Manager 120 X 53.85 = 6,462 2 Resident Engineer 748 X $50.60 = 37,849$ 3 Office Engineer 239 X $44.71 = 10,677$ 4 Asst RE/Office Engineer 0 X $0.00 = -$ 5 Materials Engineer 0 X $0.00 = -$ 6 Inspector - Earthwork/Utilities City 0 X $0.00 = -$ 7 Inspector - Structures 568 X $31.25 17,750$ 8 Document Control/Asst Inpsector 606 X $25.48 15,441$ 9 Field Engr/Inspector 0 X $0.00 = -$ BERGER/ABAM Hours, TOTAL 2,161 Subtotal Direct Salary Costs (DSC) =88,178$ Salary Escalation - Estimated Salary Escalation Costs are included in above rates -$ Overhead (OH)156.92%of (DSC + SE) =138,370$ Fixed Fee (FF)25.00%of (DSC + SE) =22,045 TOTAL SALARY COSTS (DSC + SE + OH + FF) =248,593$ DIRECT NONSALARY COSTS (DNSC) Courier 20 packages @ 25.00$ Field Office Computers 0 @ 1,500.00$ -$ Portable Laptops 2 @ 2,000.00$ Printer (by contractor) @ -$ Copier (by contractor) @ -$ Fax (by contractor) @ -$ Office Phones (by contractor) @ -$ Cell Phones (3) 5 months @ 240$ 1,200$ Mileage (2 @ 40 miles / Day = 80 mile) 5 months @ 924.00$ 4,620$ Mileage (private vehicle use, 50 miles/day) - miles @ 0.55$ -$ Miscellaneous Expendables (film, etc) estimate @ 500$ 500$ TOTAL REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES (DNSC) =6,320$ TOTAL BergerABAM FEE (DSC + SE + OH + FF + DNSC) =254,913$ BergerABAM CA&I services will be paid on a DSC multiplier equal to 2.819 DESIGN CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT SERVICES (DCSS) COSTS BergerABAM 23,112$ SUBCONSULTANTS Widener 35,010$ Hanson Professional Services 10,880$ Shannon and Wilson 10,877$ TOTAL ESTIMATED DESIGN CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT FEES = 79,879$ TOTAL ESTIMATED AMOUNT FOR CA&I + DCSS SERVICES =334,791$ -$ TOTAL AUTHORIZED AMOUNT REQUESTED FOR SUPPLEMENT NO 7 =334,791$ Page 1 of 128d. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of Supplemental Page 62 of 198 EXHIBIT E-1 CONSULTANT FEE DETERMINATION BergerABAM CA Rates 11/19/2013 Classification Name Rate (July 1, 2013 to June 30, 2014) Percent (%) Participation Blended Hourly Wage Rate Estimated Salary Escalation Factor Project Manager Bob Lee $53.85 100% $53.85 Resident Engineer Ed Cline $50.60 100% $50.60 Office Engineer Shawna Lawrence $44.71 100% $44.71 Materials Engineer $0.00 Inspector - Structures Mike Niehl $31.25 100% $31.25 Document Control/Asst Inpsecto Dana Salyer $25.48 100% $25.48 Field Engr/Inspector $0.00 Page 2 of 128d. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of Supplemental Page 63 of 198 Exhibit E-1 CONSULTANT FEE DETERMINATION BergerABAM CA Field Staff Hours 11/19/2013 STRANDER CONSTRUCTON ADMINISTRATION AND INSPECTION PLUS CSS STAFFING HOURS POSITION FIRM CY 2011 CY 2012 CY 2013 CY 2014 BA SY 2012 BA SY 2013 BA SY 2014 CY HRS BA SY HRS BA SY 2012 ESCALATION Project Manager BA 16 104 120 120 120 Resident Engineer BA 0 0 96 652 0 0 748 748 748 Office Engineer BA 0 0 92.8 146 0 0 238.8 238.8 238.8 Asst RE/Office Engineer City 000000000 Materials Engineer BA 000000000 Inspector - Earthwork/Utilities City 000000000 Inspector - Structures BA 0 0 160 408 0 0 568 568 568 Document Control/Asst Inpsector BA 0 0 48 558 0 0 606 606 606 Field Engr/Inspector BA 000000000 Estimated Hours Per Week 40 Estimated DSC Increase BA SY 2012 to BA SY 2013 5.0% Estimated DSC Increase BA SY 2013 to BA SY 2014 5.0% Page 3 of 12 8d . - T r a n s p o r t a t i o n S y s t e m s D i v i s i o n re c o m m e n d s a p p r o v a l o f S u p p l e m e n t a l Pa g e 6 4 o f 1 9 8 Exhibit E-1 CONSULTANT FEE DETERMINATION BergerABAM and City CAField Staff Hours 11/19/2013 CA&I STAFFING CALENDAR POSITION AGENCY FRACTION OF AVAILABLE TIME ALLOCATED TO POSITION FOR YEAR AND MONTH CALENDAR YEAR AND MONTH Calendar year 2011 2012 2013 2014 Month SEP OCT NOV NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN Weeks per Month 44405445445454454445454454454544454 Project Manager BA 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 Resident Engineer BA 0.60 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.20 Office Engineer BA 0.20 0.33 0.33 0.25 0.25 Asst RE/Office Engineer City Materials Engineer BA Inspector - Earthwork/Utilities City Inspector - Structures BA 1.00 1.00 0.80 0.50 Document Control/Asst Inpsector BA 0.30 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.75 Field Engr/Inspector BA Totals City + BA 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.20 2.23 2.83 2.55 2.25 1.50 0.95 0.00 BNSF SD BNSF SUTDOWN BNSF SHUTDOWN Page 4 of 12 8d . - T r a n s p o r t a t i o n S y s t e m s D i v i s i o n re c o m m e n d s a p p r o v a l o f S u p p l e m e n t a l Pa g e 6 5 o f 1 9 8 Exhibit E-1 CONSULTANT FEE DETERMINATION BergerABAM DCSS Costs 11/19/2013 DIRECT SALARY COSTS (DSC) Personnel Hours Rate Cost 1 Project Manager 0 X $82.00 = -$ 2 Project Engineer 53 X $38.00 = 2,014$ 3 Civil Engineer 62 X $32.00 = 1,984$ 4 Structural Engineer 20 X $45.00 = 900$ 5 Designer-CADD 88 X $30.00 = 2,640$ 6X=-$ 7 Admin, Clerical 22 X $25.00 = 550$ Total Hours 245 Subtotal Direct Salary Costs (DSC) =8,088$ Salary Escalation (SE) = 5% of DSC = Subtotal (DSC + SE) =8,088$ Overhead (OH)156.92%of (DSC + SE) =12,692$ Fixed Fee (FF)25.00%of (DSC + SE) =2,022$ TOTAL SALARY COSTS (DSC + SE + OH + FF) =22,802$ DIRECT NONSALARY COSTS (DNSC) Mileage 200 miles @ 0.550$ 110$ Inspection EquipmentEquipment -$ Copies 200$ TOTAL REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES (DNSC) =310$ TOTAL AUTHORIZED AMOUNT =23,112$ PAYMENT BergerABAM DCSS will be paid on a DSC multiplier equal to 2.819 Page 5 of 12 8d. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of Supplemental Page 66 of 198 Exhibit E-1 CONSULTANT FEE DETERMINATION BergerABAM DCSS Hours 11/19/2013 BergerABAM DCSS Staff BergerABAM Task TASK DESCRIPTION No.Totals DESIGN CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT SERVICES TASK 1 - Project Admin & Meetings 1 - - 24 - - - 18 42 Project Preconstruction Meeting - Attendance at Weekly Site Meetings (60 Mtgs) - Site Visits (10 site visits - 2 persons each) - 2 2 Quantity assistance - 24 - 24 Monthly Invoices and Progress Reports - - 16 16 TASK 2 - RFI's & Submittal Review 2- 29 10 - - - - 39 Construction Access Plan By CA&I Staff SWPPP Construction Stormwater Dewatering Plan Drain Pipe and Structures By CA&I Staff - Gravel By CA&I Staff - CTSB By CA&I Staff - HMA By CA&I Staff - Traffic Control Plan By CA&I Staff - Retaining Wall Piles - Retaining wall rebar - Construction Stormwater - Pump Station Shoring Pump Station Wetwell Pump Station Manhole Pump Station Mechanical Equipment Pump Station Building 24 RFI's (Assume 10) 5 10 15 TASK 3 - Change Orders 3 8 8 16 TASK 4 - Inspections 4 - - - - - - - - Included in CA&I Services and Task 1 - - TASK 5 - Record Drawings 5 - 24 20 20 80 - 4 148 Task 7 - Subconsult Ad, Bid, and Award 7 - TOTAL ESTIMATED HOURS FOR DCSS - 53 62 20 88 - 22 245 Admin, Clerical Project Manager Project Engineer Civil Engineer Structural Engineer Designer- CADD Page 6 of 12 8d . - T r a n s p o r t a t i o n S y s t e m s D i v i s i o n re c o m m e n d s a p p r o v a l o f S u p p l e m e n t a l Pa g e 6 7 o f 1 9 8 EXHIBIT G-1 SUBCONSULTANT FEE DETERMINATION Hanson Costs 11/19/2013 DIRECT SALARY COSTS (DSC) Personnel Hours Rate Cost 1 Principal 0 X $76.00 = -$ 2 Project Manager 10 X $54.00 = 540$ 3 Bridge Engineer 20 X $48.00 = 960$ 4 Shoofly Engineer 10 X $38.00 = 380$ 5 CADD-Admin 50 X $30.00 = 1,500$ Total Hours 90 Subtotal Direct Salary Costs (DSC) =3,380$ Salary Escalation (SE) = 5% of DSC =169$ Subtotal (DSC + SE) =3,549$ Overhead (OH)172.20%of (DSC + SE) =6,111$ Fixed Fee (FF)30.00%of (DSC + SE) =1,065$ TOTAL SALARY COSTS (DSC + SE + OH + FF) =10,725$ DIRECT NONSALARY COSTS (DNSC) Mileage 100 miles @ 0.550$ 55$ Miscellaneous Expendables (photographs, equip rental, etc) 100$ TOTAL REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES (DNSC) =155$ TOTAL AUTHORIZED AMOUNT =10,880$ PAYMENT Services will be paid on a DSC multiplier equal to 3.022 Page 7 of 128d. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of Supplemental Page 68 of 198 EXHIBIT G-1 SUBCONSULTANT FEE DETERMINATION Hanson Hours 11/19/2013 Project Bridge Shoofly CADD Hanson Task Principal Manager Engineer Engineer Admin Prof Svcs TASK DESCRIPTION No. Totals CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT 4 TASK 1 - Project Admin & Meetings 1 - - - - - - Precon Meeting - Project Meetings (10 each)- Site Visits (10 each - 2 persons)- Processing Monthly Construction Billings - TASK 2 - RFI's & Submittal Review 2- - - - - - Shoring and Ground Anchors - Bridge Piling - Bridge Foundation slab Rebar - Bridge Abutments and Center Pier Rebar - Bridge Structural Steel - Shoofly Track Geometry - RFIs (assume 5 each)- TASK 3 - Change Orders 3 - TASK 4 - Inspections 4 - - - - - Included in Site Visits above TASK 5 - Record Drawings 5 10 20 10 50 90 Task 7 - Subconsult Ad, Bid, and Award Support 7 - TOTAL ESTIMATED HOURS - 10 20 10 50 90 Page 8 of 128d. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of Supplemental Page 69 of 198 EXHIBIT G-1 SUBCONSULTANT FEE DETERMINATION Widener Costs 11/19/2013 DIRECT SALARY COSTS (DSC) Personnel Hours Rate Cost 1 Project Manager 213 X $140.00 = 29,820$ 2 Project Biologist 60 X $86.50 = 5,190$ 3 -$ Total Hours 273 Subtotal =35,010$ Salary Escalation (SE) = 0% of DSC =-$ Subtotal (DSC + SE) =35,010$ Overhead (OH)0.00%of (DSC + SE) =-$ Fixed Fee (FF)0.00%of (DSC + SE) =-$ TOTAL SALARY COSTS (DSC + SE + OH + FF) =35,010$ DIRECT NONSALARY COSTS (DNSC) TOTAL REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES (DNSC) =-$ TOTAL AUTHORIZED AMOUNT =35,010$ PAYMENT Services will be paid on a DSC multiplier equal to 1.000 9 of 128d. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of Supplemental Page 70 of 198 Project Manager Project Biologist Wetland Verification and Staking Field Work 13 0 Permit Verification 10 NPDES permit coordination and inspections 110 20 Construction Support 90 20 Dewater/Injection well permits 010 Totals 213 60 10 of 128d. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of Supplemental Page 71 of 198 DIRECT SALARY COSTS (DSC) Personnel Hours Rate Cost 1 Principal 17 X $61.20 = 1,040$ 2 Associate 20 X $57.69 = 1,154$ 3 Senior Engineer 2 10 X $43.27 = 433$ 4 Project Eng/Env Sci 1 0 X $34.24 = -$ 5 Staff 3 Eng/Env Sci 12 X $30.93 = 371$ 6 Staff 1-2 Eng/Env Sci 0 X $26.50 = -$ 7 Technician, Admin, Clerical 7 X $22.14 = 155$ Total Hours 66 Subtotal Direct Salary Costs (DSC) =3,153$ Salary Escalation (SE) = 5% of DSC =158$ Subtotal (DSC + SE) =3,311$ Overhead (OH)197.20%of (DSC + SE) =6,529$ Fixed Fee (FF)25.00%of (DSC + SE) =828$ TOTAL SALARY COSTS (DSC + SE + OH + FF) =10,667$ DIRECT NONSALARY COSTS (DNSC) Mileage 200 miles @ 0.550$ 110$ Inspection EquipmentEquipment -$ Copies 100$ TOTAL REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES (DNSC) =210$ TOTAL AUTHORIZED AMOUNT =10,877$ PAYMENT Services will be paid on a DSC multiplier equal to 3.222 8d. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of Supplemental Page 72 of 198 Shannon and Wilson Staff Task TASK DESCRIPTION No.Totals CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TASK 1 - Project Admin & Meetings 1 15 8 8 - - - 7 38 Site Visits (2 site visits or as requested) 8 8 8 - - - 24 Monthly Invoices and Progress Reports 7 - - - 7 14 TASK 2 - RFI's & Submittal Review 2 2 - - - 4 - - 6 RFI's (Assume 2) 2 4 6 - - TASK 3 - Change Orders 3 - TASK 4 - Inspections 4 - 12 2 - 8 - - 22 Pile Driving Monitoring 8 2 - - - - 10 Final Railroad Embankment Inspection 4 4 Final Dewatering Inspection / Decomission 4 4 Strander Underdrain Inspection 4 4 - TASK 5 - Record Drawings 5 - - - - - - - - Task 7 - Subconsult Ad, Bid, and Award 7 - TOTAL HOURS C4 17 20 10 - 12 - 7 66 Technician, Admin, Clerical Principal Associate Senior Engineer Project Engineer Staff 3 Eng/Env Sci Staff 1-2 Eng/Env Sci 8d . - T r a n s p o r t a t i o n S y s t e m s D i v i s i o n re c o m m e n d s a p p r o v a l o f S u p p l e m e n t a l Pa g e 7 3 o f 1 9 8 CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Subject/Title: Construction Management Services - Highlands to Boeing/Landing Pedestrian Connection Project by KPG, PS Meeting: Regular Council - 02 Dec 2013 Exhibits: Local Agency Standard Consultant Agreement Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board: Public Works Staff Contact: Keith Woolley, Transportation Design Project Manager, x7318 Recommended Action: Refer to Transportation/Aviation Committee Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required: $ 204,502.46 Transfer Amendment: $ Amount Budgeted: $ 230,000 Revenue Generated: $ Total Project Budget: $ 2,008,000 (2013)City Share Total Project: $ SUMMARY OF ACTION: This agreement with KPG, PS provides construction management services for the Highlands to Boeing/Landing Pedestrian Connection Project, which will construct buffered sidewalk along the north side of NE Park Drive from Garden Ave to the I-405 northbound ramps terminus, including reconstruction of the north side bridge rail of the bridge over the BNSF railroad spur line. These services include project management, documentation control, back-up inspection, contract administration, and approximately two full-time employees for approximately five months duration. This project will be advertised for construction upon receipt of a WSDOT general permit, anticipated before the end of the year. This agreement may be supplemented to include citywide safety improvements and NE 31st culvert replacement projects in the future. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the local agency agreement with KPG, PS, in the amount of $204,502.46 for construction management services during construction of the Highlands to Boeing/Landing Pedestrian Connection Project. 8e. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 74 of 198 8e. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 75 of 198 8e. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 76 of 198 8e. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 77 of 198 8e. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 78 of 198 8e. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 79 of 198 8e. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 80 of 198 8e. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 81 of 198 8e. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 82 of 198 8e. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 83 of 198 8e. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 84 of 198 8e. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 85 of 198 8e. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 86 of 198 8e. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 87 of 198 8e. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 88 of 198 8e. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 89 of 198 8e. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 90 of 198 8e. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 91 of 198 8e. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 92 of 198 8e. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 93 of 198 8e. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 94 of 198 8e. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 95 of 198 8e. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 96 of 198 8e. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 97 of 198 8e. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 98 of 198 8e. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 99 of 198 8e. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 100 of 198 8e. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 101 of 198 8e. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 102 of 198 8e. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 103 of 198 8e. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 104 of 198 8e. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 105 of 198 8e. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 106 of 198 8e. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 107 of 198 8e. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 108 of 198 8e. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 109 of 198 8e. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 110 of 198 8e. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 111 of 198 8e. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 112 of 198 8e. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 113 of 198 8e. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 114 of 198 8e. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 115 of 198 8e. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 116 of 198 8e. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 117 of 198 8e. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 118 of 198 8e. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 119 of 198 8e. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 120 of 198 CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Subject/Title: Local Agency Certification Acceptance Qualification Agreement with WSDOT Meeting: Regular Council - 02 Dec 2013 Exhibits: Local Agency CA Agreement Current Agreement WSDOT Guidelines Draft Resolution Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board: Public Works Staff Contact: Bob Hanson, Transportation Design Supervisor, x7223 Recommended Action: Refer to Transportation/Aviation Committee Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required: $ Transfer Amendment: $ Amount Budgeted: $ Revenue Generated: $ Total Project Budget: $ City Share Total Project: $ SUMMARY OF ACTION: The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) delegates authority to the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) for approving project development and construction administration. WSDOT has the option to delegate some or all of this authority to qualified local agencies. WSDOT delegates this authority through a Certification Acceptance (CA) program. Benefits to a local agency which obtains CA are realized in savings of time and money since the agency has the authority to develop, advertise, award, and manage its own projects. The City is currently certified, and certification remains indefinitely unless rescinded. However, the City’s CA agreement was last updated in 2002, and WSDOT has recommended that older CA agreements be updated and include any new position titles and a new organizational chart. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the local agency Certification Acceptance agreement with the Washington State Department of Transportation. 8f. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a Local Agency Page 121 of 198 Certification Acceptance Qualification Agreement 1 Agency City of Renton Agency No. 1070 The agency agrees to comply with the following requirements when developing all Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) project under Full CA status. 1. Adherence to the Local Agency Guidelines and all policies and procedures promulgated by the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) which accomplish the policies and objectives set forth in Title 23, U.S. Code, Highways, and the regulations issued pursuant thereto. 2. The overall approval authorities and conditions will be as follow: a. The project prospectus will be reviewed and approved by the following official. Deputy Public Works Administrator – Transportation or Transportation Design Supervisor Position Title Only b. The local agency agreement will be reviewed and approved by the following official or officials. Mayor (with staff input from Public Works Department) Position Title Only c. The designs and environmental documents will be reviewed and approved by the following state of Washington registered Professional Civil Engineer. Deputy Public Works Administrator – Transportation or Transportation Design Supervisor Position Title Only d. The hearing’s findings (if required) will be reviewed and approved by the following official or officials. Public Works Administrator Position Title Only e. The contract plans, specifications and estimate of cost will be reviewed and approved by the following state of Washington registered Professional Engineer. Deputy Public Works Administrator – Transportation or Transportation Design Supervisor Position Title Only f. Agreements will be signed by the following responsible local official: (1) Railroad Mayor, attest City Clerk Position Title Only (2) Utility Mayor, attest City Clerk Position Title Only (3) Consultant Mayor, attest City Clerk Position Title Only (4) Technical Services Mayor, attest City Clerk Position Title Only 8f. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a Local Agency Page 122 of 198 2 g. The award of contract will be signed by the following responsible local official. Mayor, attest City Clerk Position Title Only h. All projects will be constructed in conformance with the Washington State Department of Transportation/American Public Works Association (WSDOT/APWA) current Standard Specifications for Road, Bridge, and Municipal Construction M 41-10 and such specifications that modify these specifications as appropriate. Multimodal enhancement projects shall be constructed in conformance with applicable state and local codes. i. The contract administration will be supervised by the following state of Washington registered Professional Civil Engineer. Deputy Public Works Administrator – Transportation or Transportation Design Supervisor Position Title Only j. Construction administration and material sampling and testing will be accomplished in accordance with Construction Manual M 41-01 and the Local Agency Guidelines. 3. The agency agrees that they have the means to provide adequate expertise and will have support staff available to perform the functions being subdelegated. The support staff many include consultant or state services. 4. The agency agrees that the signature on each project prospectus and local agency agreement will be consistent with section 2 above. 5. All projects under Certification Acceptance shall be available for review by the FHWA and the state at any time and all project documents shall be retained and available for inspection during the plan development and construction stages and for a three year period following acceptance of the project by WSDOT. 6. Approval of the local agency certification by the Director of Highways and Local Programs may be rescinded at any time upon local agency request or if, in the opinion of the Director of Highways and Local Programs, it is necessary to do so. The rescission may be applied to all or part of the programs or projects approved in the local agency certification. ____________________________________________________ ______________________ Mayor or Chairman Date Attest: _____________________________________________ WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Approved by: _______________________________________ ______________________ Director of Highways and Local Programs Date 8f. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a Local Agency Page 123 of 198 Last Modified  9/5/2013City_of_Renton.opx CITY OF RENTON Court Services Bonnie Woodrow, Director 425-430-6550 RENTON CITIZENS CITY COUNCIL President: Randy Corman Terri Briere Marcie Palmer  Don Persson  Ed Prince  Greg Taylor  Rich Zwicker 425-430-6501 City Council Liaison Julia Medzegian MAYOR Denis Law 425-430-6500 CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER Jay Covington 425-430-6500 HUMAN RESOURCES & RISK MANAGEMENT Nancy Carlson, Administrator 425-430-7650 Risk Management Gary Lamb, Manager Benefits Program Maria Boggs, Manager Human Resources Cathryn Laird, Manager Civil Services Commission CITY ATTORNEY Larry Warren 425-430-6480 Sr. Assistant City Attorney Mark Barber Sr. Assistant City Attorney Zanetta Fontes Sr. Assistant City Attorney Garmon Newsom II Chief Prosecuting Attorney Shawn Arthur COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Charles Vincent, Administrator 425-430-6580 Economic Development Cliff Long, Director Development Services Neil Watts, Director PUBLIC WORKS Gregg Zimmerman, Administrator 425-430-7394 Transportation Systems Doug Jacobson, Deputy PW Administrator Utility Systems Lys Hornsby, Director Maintenance Services Mike Stenhouse, Director COMMUNITY SERVICES Terry Higashiyama, Administrator 425-430-6600 Facilities Peter Renner, Director Parks/Golf Course Kelly Beymer, Director Recreation Timothy Williams, Director Neighborhoods, Resources & Events Bonnie Rerecich, Manager Human Services Karen Bergsvik, Manager Museum Liz Stewart, Manager Parks Planning & Natural Resources Leslie Betlach, Director EXECUTIVE Jay Covington, CAO 425-430-6500 Mayor's Office Public Affairs Preeti Shridhar, Deputy PA Administrator ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES Iwen Wang, Administrator 425-430-6850 Fiscal Services Jamie Thomas, Director Information Technology Mehdi Sadri, Director City Clerk Bonnie Walton POLICE Kevin Milosevich, Chief 425-430-7500 Support Operations Administrative Services Investigations Special Operations Staff Services Patrol Operations Patrol Services FIRE & EMERGENCY SERVICES Mark Peterson, Chief 425-430-7000 Response Operations Erik Wallgren, Deputy Fire Chief Suppression Safety & Support Services Greg Hartman, Deputy Fire Chief Training/Logistics/Planning Emergency Management Deborah Needham, Emergency Mgmt Director Community Risk Reduction Dave Pargas, Assistant Fire Marshal MUNICIPAL COURT JUDGE Terry Jurado 425-430-6550 8f . - T r a n s p o r t a t i o n S y s t e m s D i v i s i o n re c o m m e n d s a p p r o v a l o f a L o c a l A g e n c y Pa g e 1 2 4 o f 1 9 8 PW_Administration.opx Last Modified 7/3/2013 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT - ADMINISTRATION P W - A P A A A A L M-N M S D M S D PW A - T D U S D L 8f . - T r a n s p o r t a t i o n S y s t e m s D i v i s i o n re c o m m e n d s a p p r o v a l o f a L o c a l A g e n c y Pa g e 1 2 5 o f 1 9 8 Last Modified  9/23/2013PW_Transportation Systems.opx PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Transportation Systems Division Deputy PW Administrator - Transportation Doug Jacobson Administrative Secretary I Carolyn Currie Secretary II .5 FTE Nancy Thompson Transportation Operations Manager Chris Barnes Engineering Specialist III Michelle Faltaous Engineering Specialist III Ronald Mar Civil Engineer III .5 FTE Vacant Transportation Maintenance Supervisor Eric Cutshall Office Assistant III (PT) Michelle Kreeft Signal/Electronic Sys Technician II James Garfield Signal/Electronic Sys Technician II Kevin Kennedy Signal/Electronic Sys Technician II Michael Laughlin Signal/Electronic Sys Technician II Vacant Signal/Electronic Sys Technician II David Sherer Signal/Electronic Sys Technician I David Whitmarsh Jr. Traffic Signage & Marking Supervisor Russ Evans Traffic Maintenance Worker II Ron Hemphill Traffic Maintenance Worker II Patrick LaFranchi Traffic Maintenance Worker II James Pryor Transportation Design Supervisor Robert Hanson Civil Engineer III Derek Akesson Civil Engineer III James Wilhoit Civil Engineer III Keith Woolley Transportation Planning Supervisor Jim Seitz Transportation Planner John "Dan" Hasty Program Development Coord II Juliana Fries Civil Engineer III .5 FTE Bob Mahn Airport Manager Ryan Zulauf Secretary II Susan Campbell-Hehr Assistant Airport Manager Jonathan Wilson Airport Maintenance Worker Timothy Duclos Airport Maintenance Worker Kenneth Evans Capital Project Coordinator Benjamen Dahle 8f . - T r a n s p o r t a t i o n S y s t e m s D i v i s i o n re c o m m e n d s a p p r o v a l o f a L o c a l A g e n c y Pa g e 1 2 6 o f 1 9 8 8f. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a Local Agency Page 127 of 198 8f. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a Local Agency Page 128 of 198 8f. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a Local Agency Page 129 of 198 8f. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a Local Agency Page 130 of 198 8f. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a Local Agency Page 131 of 198 8f. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a Local Agency Page 132 of 198 8f. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a Local Agency Page 133 of 198 8f. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a Local Agency Page 134 of 198 8f. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a Local Agency Page 135 of 198 8f. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a Local Agency Page 136 of 198 8f. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a Local Agency Page 137 of 198 8f. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a Local Agency Page 138 of 198 8f. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a Local Agency Page 139 of 198 8f. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a Local Agency Page 140 of 198 8f. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a Local Agency Page 141 of 198 8f. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a Local Agency Page 142 of 198 8f. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a Local Agency Page 143 of 198 8f. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a Local Agency Page 144 of 198 CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Subject/Title: AT&T Corp Utility Easement Renewal Meeting: Regular Council - 02 Dec 2013 Exhibits: Issue Paper Utility Easement Agreement Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board: Public Works Staff Contact: Ryan Zulauf, Airport Manager, X7471 Recommended Action: Refer to Transportation/Aviation Committee Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required: $ Transfer Amendment: $ Amount Budgeted: $ Revenue Generated: $16,578.90 Total Project Budget: $ City Share Total Project: $ SUMMARY OF ACTION: AT&T Corp is requesting renewal of their utility easement agreement with the City for their telecommunications equipment (fiber optics) that runs the length of West Perimeter Road on the Airport. The current easement expired on October 31, 2012, and has continued on a month-to-month basis. AT&T Corp has also requested a reduction in the trench width from 15 to 10 feet wide, reducing the total easement area from 91,905 to 61,403.35 square feet. The easement rate for the total area has been increased from $0.18 to $0.27 per square foot per year, using a recent market appraisal. The new easement is for a 12-year period, terminating on October 31, 2025. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve the renewal of AT&T Corp’s easement and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the new Utility Easement Agreement. 8g. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of an airport utility Page 145 of 198 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT M E M O R A N D U M DATE:November 20, 2013 TO:Randy Corman, Council President Members of the Renton City Council VIA:Denis Law, Mayor FROM:Gregg Zimmerman, Administrator STAFF CONTACT:Ryan Zulauf, Airport Manager (ext 7471) SUBJECT:AT&T Corp Utility Easement Renewal ISSUE: Should the Council approve the renewal of AT&T Corp’s Utility Easement Agreement for their telecommunications equipment trench on the Airport? RECOMMENDATION: Approve the renewal of AT&T Corp’s easement and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the new Utility Easement Agreement. BACKGROUND: AT&T Corp has an easement with the City that runs the length of West Perimeter Road on the Airport for their telecommunications equipment (fiber optics). The telecommunications line was installed in 1987, with approval by the City under an easement agreement, PAG 001-87, that expired on October 31, 2012. The utility easement then continued on a month-to-month basis while a new utility easement agreement was written that includes updated easement language. The new Utility Easement Agreement has been signed by AT&T Corp and has an effective date of November 1, 2013, and continues for a period of 12 years, to expire on October 31, 2025. A new agreement is necessary in order to incorporate current easement and insurance requirements that are in the standard lease document. The new agreement also establishes reduced easement dimensions and an increase in the easement rate. 8g. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of an airport utility Page 146 of 198 Randy Corman, Council President Members of the Renton City Council Page 2 of 2 November 20, 2013 In late 2012, Allen Brackett Shedd provided an appraisal of the easement area to establish a current fair market easement rate. They determined the new fair market value of the easement area to be $0.27 per square foot per year, an increase of $0.08 over the previous rate of $0.19 per square foot per year. The new easement rate of $0.27 per square foot per year is a discounted rate from the standard lease rate. The new easement agreement allows for periodic rate adjustments using either the Consumer Price Index or another means as determined by the City. AT&T Corp provided a recent survey of the easement area, which includes a reduction in the width of the right-of-way area from fifteen feet wide to ten feet wide. The new easement area is determined to be 61,403.35 square feet, a reduction of 30,501.65 square feet. The easement rate increase and the square footage reduction equates to a new annual easement amount of $16,578.90. This results in a reduction in Airport leasehold revenue of $708.43 annually. The term of the easement is 12 years, with an expiration date of October 31, 2025. cc:Doug Jacobson, Deputy PW Administrator – Transportation Carolyn Currie, Transportation Administrative Secretary Susan Campbell-Hehr, Airport Secretary 8g. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of an airport utility Page 147 of 198 8g. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of an airport utility Page 148 of 198 8g. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of an airport utility Page 149 of 198 8g. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of an airport utility Page 150 of 198 8g. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of an airport utility Page 151 of 198 8g. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of an airport utility Page 152 of 198 8g. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of an airport utility Page 153 of 198 8g. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of an airport utility Page 154 of 198 8g. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of an airport utility Page 155 of 198 8g. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of an airport utility Page 156 of 198 8g. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of an airport utility Page 157 of 198 8g. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of an airport utility Page 158 of 198 8g. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of an airport utility Page 159 of 198 8g. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of an airport utility Page 160 of 198 10a. - 2014 Fee Schedule (Approved via 11/25/2013 Committee of the Whole Page 161 of 198 10a. - 2014 Fee Schedule (Approved via 11/25/2013 Committee of the Whole Page 162 of 198 10a. - 2014 Fee Schedule (Approved via 11/25/2013 Committee of the Whole Page 163 of 198 10a. - 2014 Fee Schedule (Approved via 11/25/2013 Committee of the Whole Page 164 of 198 10a. - 2014 Fee Schedule (Approved via 11/25/2013 Committee of the Whole Page 165 of 198 10a. - 2014 Fee Schedule (Approved via 11/25/2013 Committee of the Whole Page 166 of 198 10a. - 2014 Fee Schedule (Approved via 11/25/2013 Committee of the Whole Page 167 of 198 10a. - 2014 Fee Schedule (Approved via 11/25/2013 Committee of the Whole Page 168 of 198 10a. - 2014 Fee Schedule (Approved via 11/25/2013 Committee of the Whole Page 169 of 198 10a. - 2014 Fee Schedule (Approved via 11/25/2013 Committee of the Whole Page 170 of 198 10a. - 2014 Fee Schedule (Approved via 11/25/2013 Committee of the Whole Page 171 of 198 10a. - 2014 Fee Schedule (Approved via 11/25/2013 Committee of the Whole Page 172 of 198 10a. - 2014 Fee Schedule (Approved via 11/25/2013 Committee of the Whole Page 173 of 198 10a. - 2014 Fee Schedule (Approved via 11/25/2013 Committee of the Whole Page 174 of 198 10a. - 2014 Fee Schedule (Approved via 11/25/2013 Committee of the Whole Page 175 of 198 10a. - 2014 Fee Schedule (Approved via 11/25/2013 Committee of the Whole Page 176 of 198 10a. - 2014 Fee Schedule (Approved via 11/25/2013 Committee of the Whole Page 177 of 198 10a. - 2014 Fee Schedule (Approved via 11/25/2013 Committee of the Whole Page 178 of 198 10a. - 2014 Fee Schedule (Approved via 11/25/2013 Committee of the Whole Page 179 of 198 10a. - 2014 Fee Schedule (Approved via 11/25/2013 Committee of the Whole Page 180 of 198 10a. - 2014 Fee Schedule (Approved via 11/25/2013 Committee of the Whole Page 181 of 198 10a. - 2014 Fee Schedule (Approved via 11/25/2013 Committee of the Whole Page 182 of 198 10a. - 2014 Fee Schedule (Approved via 11/25/2013 Committee of the Whole Page 183 of 198 10a. - 2014 Fee Schedule (Approved via 11/25/2013 Committee of the Whole Page 184 of 198 10a. - Establishing the 2014 property tax levy (1st reading 11/25/2013) Page 185 of 198 10a. - Establishing the 2014 property tax levy (1st reading 11/25/2013) Page 186 of 198 10b. - Decreasing water utility tax (1st reading 11/25/2013)Page 187 of 198 10b. - Decreasing water utility tax (1st reading 11/25/2013)Page 188 of 198 10c. - 2013/2014 Mid-biennium budget adjustment (1st reading 11/25/2013) Page 189 of 198 10c. - 2013/2014 Mid-biennium budget adjustment (1st reading 11/25/2013) Page 190 of 198 10c. - 2013/2014 Mid-biennium budget adjustment (1st reading 11/25/2013) Page 191 of 198 10c. - 2013/2014 Mid-biennium budget adjustment (1st reading 11/25/2013) Page 192 of 198 10d. - Deed of donation from Erwin & Scott for S. Carr Rd properties (1st Page 193 of 198 10d. - Deed of donation from Erwin & Scott for S. Carr Rd properties (1st Page 194 of 198 10d. - Deed of donation from Erwin & Scott for S. Carr Rd properties (1st Page 195 of 198 10d. - Deed of donation from Erwin & Scott for S. Carr Rd properties (1st Page 196 of 198 10d. - Deed of donation from Erwin & Scott for S. Carr Rd properties (1st Page 197 of 198 10d. - Deed of donation from Erwin & Scott for S. Carr Rd properties (1st Page 198 of 198