HomeMy WebLinkAboutRegular Council Agenda Packet - 13 May 2013 - PdfAGENDA
RENTON CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
May 13, 2013
Monday, 7 p.m.
1.CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
2.ROLL CALL
3.PROCLAMATION
a. Missing Children's Day - May 25, 2013
4.PUBLIC HEARING
a. Kent, Renton, and Issaquah School District Impact Fees
5.ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
6.AUDIENCE COMMENT
(Speakers must sign up prior to the Council meeting. Each speaker is allowed five minutes. The
first comment period is limited to one-half hour. The second comment period later on in the
agenda is unlimited in duration.) When you are recognized by the Presiding Officer, please walk to
the podium and state your name and city of residence for the record, SPELLING YOUR LAST NAME.
NOTICE to all participants: pursuant to state law, RCW 42.17A.555, campaigning for any ballot
measure or candidate in City Hall and/or during any portion of the council meeting, including
the audience comment portion of the meeting, is PROHIBITED.
7.CONSENT AGENDA
The following items are distributed to Councilmembers in advance for study and review, and the
recommended actions will be accepted in a single motion. Any item may be removed for further
discussion if requested by a Councilmember.
a. Approval of 5/6/2013 Council meeting minutes. Council concur.
b. Community Services Department recommends approval of an amendment to CAG-08-015, with
Fire Protection District #40, in the amount of $4,500 for project management services for the
demolition of their Fire Station 42. Council concur. (See 9.a. for resolution.)
c. Public Works Department requests authorization to convert a Surface Water Maintenance
Worker III position to a Lead Maintenance Worker position; and authorization to fill the new
position at Step D of the Grade a16 salary scale. Refer to Finance Committee.
d. Utility Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Coast & Harbor Engineering
in the amount of $992,599.52 for the final engineering design of the Cedar River Gravel
Removal project. Council concur.
Page 1 of 149
8.UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Topics listed below were discussed in Council committees during the past week. Those topics
marked with an asterisk (*) may include legislation. Committee reports on any topics may be held
by the Chair if further review is necessary.
a. Community Services Committee: Shepherd Appointment to Municipal Arts Commission; Park
Rules & Regulations Code Amendment*
b. Finance Committee: School District Impact Fees*; LED Street Light Conversion Project
Financing Bond*; Lease Amendment with Iron Mountain
c. Transportation (Aviation) Committee: Amendment to LED Street Light Conversion Contract
9.RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
Resolutions:
a. Amendment to interlocal agreement with Fire District 40 for Fire Station 42 demolition
project management (See 7.b.)
b. Authorizing imposition of school district impact fees (See 8.b.)
Ordinances for first reading:
a. Park Rules & Regulations code amendment (See 8.a.)
b. School district impact fees code amendment and capital facilities plans adoption (See
8.b.)
c. School district impact fee waiver code amendment (See 8.b.)
d. LED street light conversion project financing LTGO bond issuance (See 8.b.)
Ordinance for second and final reading:
a. Entertainment device license fee code amendment (1st reading 5/6/2013)
10.NEW BUSINESS
(Includes Council Committee agenda topics; call 425-430-6512 for recorded information.)
11.AUDIENCE COMMENT
12.ADJOURNMENT
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE AGENDA (Preceding Council Meeting)
7TH FLOOR CONFERENCING CENTER
May 13, 2013; Monday, 6 p.m.
Legislative Update (briefing)
• Hearing assistance devices for use in the Council Chambers are available upon request to the City Clerk •
CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS ARE TELEVISED LIVE ON GOVERNMENT ACCESS CHANNEL 21 AND ARE RECABLECAST:
Tues. & Thurs. at 11 AM & 9 PM, Wed. & Fri at 9 AM & 7 PM and Sat. & Sun. at 1 PM & 9 PM
Page 2 of 149
3a. - Missing Children's Day - May 25,
2013 Page 3 of 149
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Subject/Title:
Agreement with King County Fire Protection
District #40
Meeting:
Regular Council - 13 May 2013
Exhibits:
Agreement
Resolution
Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board:
Community Services
Staff Contact:
Peter Renner, Facilities Director, Ext. 6605
Recommended Action:
Council concur
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required: $ Transfer Amendment: $
Amount Budgeted: $ Revenue Generated: $$4,500.00
Total Project Budget: $ City Share Total Project: $
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
The City of Renton and King County Fire Protection District #40 (FD 40) have an Interlocal Agreement,
CAG-08-015, whereby the City provides Fire and Emergency Services to FD 40. By separate
Memorandum of Understanding agreement (CAG-12-043) the City's Facilities Department agreed to
provide project management services for the renovation of Fire Station 17, which is owned by FD 40.
This work is near completion.
FD 40 also wished to contract the City for project management services for the demolition of their
former district headquarters station (FS 42), which was not covered by CAG-08-015 or CAG-12-043. The
attached Agreement provides FD 40 a means to authorize payment to the City for this work. The fee is
5% of the total project cost, which is a standard fee for such work. The Agreement terminates when the
project is complete and payment is made.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the Addendum regarding demolition and adopt the Resolution
7b. - Community Services Department
recommends approval of an amendment Page 4 of 149
7b. - Community Services Department
recommends approval of an amendment Page 5 of 149
7b. - Community Services Department
recommends approval of an amendment Page 6 of 149
7b. - Community Services Department
recommends approval of an amendment Page 7 of 149
7b. - Community Services Department
recommends approval of an amendment Page 8 of 149
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Subject/Title:
Convert Surface Water Maintenance
Maintenance Worker III Position to Lead
Maintenance Worker Position and Hire at Grade
a16, Step D
Meeting:
Regular Council - 13 May 2013
Exhibits:
Issue Paper
Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board:
Public Works
Staff Contact:
Mike Stenhouse (ext. 2260); Rich Marshall (ext.
2290)
Recommended Action:
Refer to Finance Committee
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required: $ $4,350 (Fund 407.019) Transfer Amendment: $
Amount Budgeted: $ Revenue Generated: $
Total Project Budget: $ City Share Total Project: $ $4,350 (Fund 407.019)
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
The Surface Water Maintenance Section is fully staffed and consists of Maintenance Workers IIs and IIIs
(grade a08 and a12 respectively) and one Lead Maintenance Worker (grade a16). However, due to the
impact of taking on the maintenance of additional stormwater facilities from HOAs and those assumed
as a result of annexations after the 2008 Benson/Cascade annexation, as well as meeting NPDES Permit
mandates, the Surface Water Maintenance Section requires additional leadership and authority in the
field and would greatly benefit from a minor re-organization that will convert a Maintenance Worker III
position to a Lead Maintenance Worker position. Establishing this position at grade a16, Step D will
satisfy the promotional pay provision called for by the AFSCME Union Local 2170 contract. Since the
Section has Maintenance Worker IIIs who are qualified and interested in applying for this new Lead
position, the position will only be offered to current Surface Water Maintenance staff. This minor re-
organization will not change the employee count in the Section. The budget impact of promoting a MW
III (grade a12 Step E $59,124) to a Lead Maintenance Worker (grade a16 Step D $62,148) will be of
$4,350 (salary and benefits) in 2013.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Authorize a minor re-organization of the Public Works Surface Water Maintenance Section that will
convert a current Maintenance Worker III position to a Lead Maintenance Worker position and hire at
grade a16, Step D to satisfy the promotional pay provision called for by the AFSCME Union Local 2170
contract.
7c. - Public Works Department requests
authorization to convert a Surface Water Page 9 of 149
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE:April 25, 2013
TO:Randy Corman, Council President
Members of the Renton City Council
VIA:Denis Law, Mayor
FROM:Gregg Zimmerman, Public Works Administrator
STAFF CONTACT:Mike Stenhouse, Maintenance Services Director (ext. 2260)
Rich Marshall, Maintenance Services Manager (ext. 2290)
SUBJECT:Minor Re-organization of the Surface Water Maintenance Section
to Convert a Current Maintenance Worker III Position to a Lead
Maintenance Worker Position and Hire at Grade a16, Step D
ISSUE:
Should Council authorize a minor re-organization of the Public Works Surface Water
Maintenance Section that will convert a current Maintenance Worker III position to a Lead
Maintenance Worker position and hire this person at grade a16, Step D to satisfy the
promotional pay provision called for by the AFSCME Union Local 2170 contract?
RECOMMENDATION:
Authorize a minor re-organization of the Public Works Surface Water Maintenance Section
that will convert a Maintenance Worker III position to a Lead Maintenance Worker position
and hire this person at grade a16, Step D to satisfy the promotional pay provision called for
by the AFSCME Union Local 2170 contract.
BACKGROUND SUMMARY:
On October 18, 2010 Council approved a new program to assume maintenance and
operation of all stormwater facilities located in plats that manage runoff from public streets.
This program, which includes budget for hiring staff and purchasing equipment, was
implemented as part of the 2012 budget adjustment process and is to be phased in over the
next few years. The Surface Water Utility is currently working with the Home Owners
7c. - Public Works Department requests
authorization to convert a Surface Water Page 10 of 149
Randy Corman, Council President
Members of the Renton City Council
Page 2 of 2
April 25, 2013
Associations (HOAs) to bring these facilities up to city maintenance standards so that the
facilities can be transferred to the city. The first facilities were transferred in 2012.
The Surface Water Maintenance Section is fully staffed and consists of Maintenance
Workers IIs and IIIs (grade a08 and a12 respectively), and one Lead Maintenance Worker
(grade a16) who provides authority, supervision and direction in the field. However, due to
the impact of taking on the maintenance of additional stormwater facilities from the HOAs
and those assumed as a result of annexations after the 2008 Benson/Cascade annexation, as
well as meeting NPDES Permit mandates, the Surface Water Maintenance Section requires
additional leadership and authority in the field and would greatly benefit from a minor re-
organization that will promote a Maintenance Worker III position to a Lead Maintenance
Worker position. Establishing this position at grade a16, Step D will satisfy the promotional
pay provision called for by the AFSCME Union Local 2170 contract. Since the Section has
Maintenance Worker IIIs who are qualified and interested in applying for this new Lead
position, the position will only be offered to current Surface Water Maintenance staff. The
budget impact of promoting a Maintenance Worker III (grade a12 Step E $59,124) to a Lead
Maintenance Worker (grade a16 Step D $62,148) will consist of $4,350 (salary and benefits)
in 2013. This minor re-organization will not change the employee count in this section.
CONCLUSION:
Authorization of a minor re-organization of the Public Works Surface Water Maintenance
Section that will convert a current Maintenance Worker III position to a Lead Maintenance
Worker position will provide the needed leadership and authority in the field resulting in
increased capacity to meet the recently expanded workload of maintaining stormwater
facilities taken over from existing HOAs and those assumed through annexations after the
2008 Benson/Cascade annexation, and continue to allow the Section to meet the NPDES
Permit maintenance mandates. Hiring this person at grade a16, Step D will satisfy the
promotional pay provision called for by the AFSCME Union Local 2170 contract.
cc:Iwen Wang, Administrative Services Administrator
Nancy Carlson, Human Resources/Risk Management Administrator
Mike Stenhouse, Maintenance Services Director
Lys Hornsby, Utility Systems Director
Rich Marshall, Maintenance Services Manager
Cathryn Laird, Human Resources Manager
Ron Straka, Surface Water Engineering Supervisor
JoAnn Wykpisz, Principal Financial & Administrative Analyst
7c. - Public Works Department requests
authorization to convert a Surface Water Page 11 of 149
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Subject/Title:
Cedar River Gravel Removal Project Engineering
Consultant Agreement with Coast & Harbor
Engineering
Meeting:
Regular Council - 13 May 2013
Exhibits:
Issue Paper
Contract
Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board:
Public Works
Staff Contact:
Ron Straka, x7248, Steve Lee, x7205
Recommended Action:
Council Concur
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required: $ $992,599.52 Transfer Amendment: $NA
Amount Budgeted: $ $1,267,245.00 Revenue Generated: $NA
Total Project Budget: $ $1,267,245.00 City Share Total Project: $ NA
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
The purpose of the Cedar River Gravel Removal Project is to perform maintenance dredging of up to
150,000 cubic yards of gravel from the mouth of the Cedar River to the Williams Street Bridge in order
to reduce flood risks to private, public, and commercial properties. This project includes removing river
sediments settled in the channel approximately 4 feet deep, repairing unstable banks developed since
the last dredging, replanting, exporting sediments offsite, and removing invasive vegetation in areas
adjacent to the levee and floodwall. The project will also include a mitigation element to be determined
during the permitting process.
Work to be completed under this engineering consultant agreement with Coast and Harbor Engineering
(CHE), in the amount of $992,599.52, will include data collection, survey and base map preparation,
permitting support, final design, preparation of a technical reports, public outreach support,
construction plans and specifications, services during bidding and project management. The funding for
the Cedar River Gravel Removal Project is being provided by our agreement (CAG 13-009) with the King
County Flood Control District (KCFCD).
The Cedar River Gravel Removal Project will be funded by KCFCD’s Capital Improvement Project budget
($5,313,000) for the project which includes the City’s KCFCD Opportunity fund ($150,000). The approved
2013 CIP budget for the project is $1,267,245. The remaining project budget is for City project
management and construction costs.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the Engineering Consultant Agreement with CHE for the
final engineering design of the Cedar River Gravel Removal Project, in the amount of $992,599.52.
7d. - Utility Systems Division recommends
approval of a contract with Coast & Page 12 of 149
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE:May 6, 2013
TO:Randy Corman, Council President
Members of the Renton City Council
VIA:Denis Law, Mayor
FROM: Gregg Zimmerman, Administrator
STAFF CONTACT:Ron Straka, Surface Water Utility Supervisor, x7248
Steve Lee, Surface Water Utility Engineer, x7205
SUBJECT:Cedar River Gravel Removal Project Engineering Consultant
Agreement with Coast & Harbor Engineering
ISSUE:
Should Council approve an Engineering Consultant Agreement with Coast and Harbor
Engineering (CHE) in the amount of $992,599.52 to implement the Cedar River Gravel
Removal Project?
RECOMMENDATION:
Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the Engineering Consulting Agreement with
Coast Harbor Engineering for the planning, permitting and design of the Cedar River Gravel
Removal Project, in the amount of $992,599.52.
BACKGROUND:
The purpose of the Cedar River Gravel Removal Project is to perform maintenance dredging
of up to 150,000 cubic yards of gravel from the mouth of the Cedar River (river mile 0) to the
Williams Street Bridge (river mile 1.25) in order to reduce flood risks to private, public and
commercial properties in the lower Cedar River. This project includes removing river
sediments settled in the channel approximately 4 feet deep, repairing unstable banks
developed since the last dredging, replanting near the ordinary high water line for disturbed
areas, exporting sediments offsite, and removing invasive vegetation in areas adjacent to the
levee and floodwall. The project will also include a mitigation element to be determined
during the permitting process.
This project is part of the City’s maintenance obligations to maintain the flood protection
benefits as required by the Project Cooperation Agreement for the United States Army Corp
of Engineers (USACE) Cedar River Section 205 Flood Hazard Reduction Project (205 Project).
The 205 Project is a federally authorized project originally designed, permitted and
constructed by the USACE Seattle District with the City of Renton as the local project sponsor
7d. - Utility Systems Division recommends
approval of a contract with Coast & Page 13 of 149
Mr. Corman, Council President
May 6, 2013
Page 2 of 3
/STLah
that included initial dredging of the lower 1.25 miles of the Cedar River, construction of
levees and floodwalls and mitigation. The initial dredging was completed in 1998 and the
levees and floodwall construction were completed in 2000. Due to the annual sediment
accumulation in the 205 Project reach, the lower Cedar River is approaching the maximum
allowable bed elevation that represents the highest allowable river bed elevation prior to
dredging as indicated in the 205 Project Operations and Maintenance Manual. Compliance
with the O&M Manual is part of the terms and conditions of the executed Project
Cooperation Agreement (PCA) dated May 9, 1998, between t USACE and the City. The
maintenance dredging is needed to maintain the flood protection benefits of the 205 Project
and remain eligible for federal funding to repair damages to the levees and floodwall from a
federally declared disaster.
The consultant agreement with the CHE team to implement the Cedar River Gravel Removal
Project will include: review of existing data; gathering new data; providing preliminary
analyses for geotechnical, natural resources, sediments, bank stabilization, constructability,
alternative and conceptual design; development of construction plans and specifications
including 30%, 65% and 95% designs; assistance during bidding; and providing environmental
review and permitting [National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) /State Environmental Policy
Act (SEPA)], shoreline, clearing and grading, Joint Aquatic Resources Permit Application
(JARPA), Endangered Species Act (ESA) consultation, construction NPDES, 401 clean water
compliance and 106 cultural resources approvals.
Deliverable reports to be provided by the consultant include: the field reconnaissance
findings technical memorandum; critical areas summary report; hydraulic engineering
summary report; basis of design technical memorandum; survey; habitat assessment plan
and report; conceptual design report; permit plan technical memorandum; graphics for
meetings; structural engineering report on structures; construction Stormwater Pollution
Protection Plan (SWPPP); qualitative geotechnical report; tier 1 dredged material
management office report; construction plans; stormwater TIR drainage plan; meeting notes;
graphics for meetings; conceptual mitigation plan; 106 cultural resources assessment report;
vegetation/cutting plan; Corps 404 permit and alternatives analysis; JARPA submittal for the
State Hydraulic Permit Approval; Biological Assessment report; re-vegetation plan;
SEPA/NEPA EA document; Corps pre-application memorandum; construction mylars; and
assistance during bidding.
This consultant agreement will provide the necessary engineering, planning, outreach, and
environmental permitting assistance necessary to implement the maintenance dredging
project. The CHE team was selected by a panel consisting of a representative from the King
County Flood Control District and City personnel with technical experiences in permitting,
engineering, river processes and natural environments through an advertised request for
proposal, statement of qualifications and interviewing process. The CHE team also has
knowledge and experience working within the City on other projects as well as having
successfully completed numerous other projects with similar scope.
7d. - Utility Systems Division recommends
approval of a contract with Coast & Page 14 of 149
Mr. Corman, Council President
May 6, 2013
Page 3 of 3
/STLah
Expected challenges for this project include: obtaining numerous local, state and federal
permits with permitting of the maintenance dredging requiring consideration of mitigation of
impacts to endangered species not originally mitigated for within the original 205 Project
Environmental Impact Statement; constructing within short fisheries allowable timelines; and
working in close proximity to commercial, residential, airport and park properties.
The project engineering consultant contract budget is $992,599.52 which is funded by the
King County Flood Control District budget ($5,313,360). The KCFCD budget includes $150,000
from the City’s share of the KFCDC Opportunity Fund. The approved 2013 Surface Water
Utility Capital Improvement Plan budget for the Cedar River Gravel Removal Project
(427.475185) is $1,267,245. The remaining project budget is for City project management
and construction.
The terms of the recently signed agreement (CAG 13-009) between King County and the City
of Renton is to provide funding for project management, design, engineering, permitting,
planning, public outreach, mitigation and construction for this project.
CONCLUSION:
The Cedar River Gravel Removal Project will maintain flood protection benefits to private,
pubic and commercial properties in the lower Cedar River. The Surface Water Utility
recommends the City Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the Engineering
Consultant Agreement with Coast and Harbor Engineering in the amount of $992,599.52 for
the design, permitting and preparation of construction plans and specifications for the Cedar
River Gravel Removal Project.
Attachment
cc:Lys Hornsby, Utility Systems Director
File
7d. - Utility Systems Division recommends
approval of a contract with Coast & Page 15 of 149
7d. - Utility Systems Division recommends
approval of a contract with Coast & Page 16 of 149
7d. - Utility Systems Division recommends
approval of a contract with Coast & Page 17 of 149
7d. - Utility Systems Division recommends
approval of a contract with Coast & Page 18 of 149
7d. - Utility Systems Division recommends
approval of a contract with Coast & Page 19 of 149
7d. - Utility Systems Division recommends
approval of a contract with Coast & Page 20 of 149
7d. - Utility Systems Division recommends
approval of a contract with Coast & Page 21 of 149
7d. - Utility Systems Division recommends
approval of a contract with Coast & Page 22 of 149
7d. - Utility Systems Division recommends
approval of a contract with Coast & Page 23 of 149
7d. - Utility Systems Division recommends
approval of a contract with Coast & Page 24 of 149
7d. - Utility Systems Division recommends
approval of a contract with Coast & Page 25 of 149
7d. - Utility Systems Division recommends
approval of a contract with Coast & Page 26 of 149
7d. - Utility Systems Division recommends
approval of a contract with Coast & Page 27 of 149
7d. - Utility Systems Division recommends
approval of a contract with Coast & Page 28 of 149
7d. - Utility Systems Division recommends
approval of a contract with Coast & Page 29 of 149
7d. - Utility Systems Division recommends
approval of a contract with Coast & Page 30 of 149
7d. - Utility Systems Division recommends
approval of a contract with Coast & Page 31 of 149
7d. - Utility Systems Division recommends
approval of a contract with Coast & Page 32 of 149
7d. - Utility Systems Division recommends
approval of a contract with Coast & Page 33 of 149
7d. - Utility Systems Division recommends
approval of a contract with Coast & Page 34 of 149
7d. - Utility Systems Division recommends
approval of a contract with Coast & Page 35 of 149
7d. - Utility Systems Division recommends
approval of a contract with Coast & Page 36 of 149
7d. - Utility Systems Division recommends
approval of a contract with Coast & Page 37 of 149
7d. - Utility Systems Division recommends
approval of a contract with Coast & Page 38 of 149
7d. - Utility Systems Division recommends
approval of a contract with Coast & Page 39 of 149
7d. - Utility Systems Division recommends
approval of a contract with Coast & Page 40 of 149
7d. - Utility Systems Division recommends
approval of a contract with Coast & Page 41 of 149
7d. - Utility Systems Division recommends
approval of a contract with Coast & Page 42 of 149
7d. - Utility Systems Division recommends
approval of a contract with Coast & Page 43 of 149
7d. - Utility Systems Division recommends
approval of a contract with Coast & Page 44 of 149
7d. - Utility Systems Division recommends
approval of a contract with Coast & Page 45 of 149
7d. - Utility Systems Division recommends
approval of a contract with Coast & Page 46 of 149
7d. - Utility Systems Division recommends
approval of a contract with Coast & Page 47 of 149
7d. - Utility Systems Division recommends
approval of a contract with Coast & Page 48 of 149
7d. - Utility Systems Division recommends
approval of a contract with Coast & Page 49 of 149
7d. - Utility Systems Division recommends
approval of a contract with Coast & Page 50 of 149
7d. - Utility Systems Division recommends
approval of a contract with Coast & Page 51 of 149
7d. - Utility Systems Division recommends
approval of a contract with Coast & Page 52 of 149
9a. - Amendment to interlocal agreement
with Fire District 40 for Fire Station 42 Page 53 of 149
9a. - Amendment to interlocal agreement
with Fire District 40 for Fire Station 42 Page 54 of 149
9b. - Authorizing imposition of school
district impact fees (See 8.b.)Page 55 of 149
9b. - Authorizing imposition of school
district impact fees (See 8.b.)Page 56 of 149
9b. - Authorizing imposition of school
district impact fees (See 8.b.)Page 57 of 149
9a. - Park Rules & Regulations code
amendment (See 8.a.)Page 58 of 149
9a. - Park Rules & Regulations code
amendment (See 8.a.)Page 59 of 149
9a. - Park Rules & Regulations code
amendment (See 8.a.)Page 60 of 149
9a. - Park Rules & Regulations code
amendment (See 8.a.)Page 61 of 149
9a. - Park Rules & Regulations code
amendment (See 8.a.)Page 62 of 149
9a. - Park Rules & Regulations code
amendment (See 8.a.)Page 63 of 149
9a. - Park Rules & Regulations code
amendment (See 8.a.)Page 64 of 149
9a. - Park Rules & Regulations code
amendment (See 8.a.)Page 65 of 149
9a. - Park Rules & Regulations code
amendment (See 8.a.)Page 66 of 149
9a. - Park Rules & Regulations code
amendment (See 8.a.)Page 67 of 149
9a. - Park Rules & Regulations code
amendment (See 8.a.)Page 68 of 149
9a. - Park Rules & Regulations code
amendment (See 8.a.)Page 69 of 149
9a. - Park Rules & Regulations code
amendment (See 8.a.)Page 70 of 149
9a. - Park Rules & Regulations code
amendment (See 8.a.)Page 71 of 149
9a. - Park Rules & Regulations code
amendment (See 8.a.)Page 72 of 149
9a. - Park Rules & Regulations code
amendment (See 8.a.)Page 73 of 149
9a. - Park Rules & Regulations code
amendment (See 8.a.)Page 74 of 149
9b. - School district impact fees code
amendment and capital facilities plans
Page 75 of 149
9b. - School district impact fees code
amendment and capital facilities plans
Page 76 of 149
9b. - School district impact fees code
amendment and capital facilities plans
Page 77 of 149
9b. - School district impact fees code
amendment and capital facilities plans
Page 78 of 149
1
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO. ________
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AMENDING SECTION
4-1-160, OF CHAPTER 1, ADMINISTRATION AND ENFORCEMENT, OF TITLE IV
(DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS) OF THE RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE, ADDING A
NEW SUBSECTION 4-1-160.E.4, REGARDING SCHOOL IMPACT FEES WAIVER,
PAYMENT UNDER PROTEST, AND APPEALS.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. Subsection 4-1-160.E, Assessment of School Impact Fees, of Chapter 1,
Administration and Enforcement, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of the Renton
Municipal Code, is hereby amended to add a new subsection 4, to read as follows:
a. Waiver: If any applicant, owner, or developer fails to identify any
error, miscalculation, misclassification of the type of dwelling unit, or erroneous
assessment at the time that the school impact fee is assessed, any claim other
than for a refund of school impact fees and related interest earned on the same
school impact fees, shall be permanently waived. Strict compliance is required
under this subsection.
b. Payment under Protest: If an applicant, owner, or developer
identifies an error, miscalculation, misclassification of the type of dwelling unit,
or erroneous assessment at the time that the school impact fee is assessed, that
applicant, owner, or developer may pay the school impact fee under protest in
order to obtain a permit or other related approval of development activity.
9c. - School district impact fee waiver
code amendment (See 8.b.)Page 79 of 149
ORDINANCE NO. ________
2
Payment under protest automatically results in the scheduling of an
administrative hearing, unless withdrawn by the applicant, owner, or developer.
c. Appeal after Payment under Protest: Based on principles of
fairness and due process, if an applicant, owner, or developer identifies an error,
miscalculation, misclassification of the type of dwelling unit, or erroneous
assessment at the time that the school impact fee is assessed, that applicant,
owner, or developer may have an administrative hearing before the
Administrator, within fourteen (14) calendar days of the date that payment was
made under protest. The standard of proof shall be by a preponderance of the
evidence. If the applicant, owner, or developer wants to appeal the
Administrator’s oral or written decision, the applicant, owner, or developer may
request an appeal by filing that request with the Renton City Clerk, within seven
(7) calendar days of the Administrator’s decision. The appeal shall be based
solely on the record, before the Hearing Examiner using the clearly erroneous
standard of review. There are no additional appeals.
SECTION II. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and thirty
(30) days after publication.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this _______ day of ___________________, 2013.
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
9c. - School district impact fee waiver
code amendment (See 8.b.)Page 80 of 149
ORDINANCE NO. ________
3
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this _______ day of _____________________, 2013.
Denis Law, Mayor
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Date of Publication:
ORD:1786:3/14/13:scr
9c. - School district impact fee waiver
code amendment (See 8.b.)Page 81 of 149
9d. - LED street light conversion project
financing LTGO bond issuance (See 8.b.)
Page 82 of 149
9d. - LED street light conversion project
financing LTGO bond issuance (See 8.b.)
Page 83 of 149
9d. - LED street light conversion project
financing LTGO bond issuance (See 8.b.)
Page 84 of 149
9d. - LED street light conversion project
financing LTGO bond issuance (See 8.b.)
Page 85 of 149
9d. - LED street light conversion project
financing LTGO bond issuance (See 8.b.)
Page 86 of 149
9d. - LED street light conversion project
financing LTGO bond issuance (See 8.b.)
Page 87 of 149
9d. - LED street light conversion project
financing LTGO bond issuance (See 8.b.)
Page 88 of 149
9d. - LED street light conversion project
financing LTGO bond issuance (See 8.b.)
Page 89 of 149
9d. - LED street light conversion project
financing LTGO bond issuance (See 8.b.)
Page 90 of 149
9d. - LED street light conversion project
financing LTGO bond issuance (See 8.b.)
Page 91 of 149
9d. - LED street light conversion project
financing LTGO bond issuance (See 8.b.)
Page 92 of 149
9d. - LED street light conversion project
financing LTGO bond issuance (See 8.b.)
Page 93 of 149
9d. - LED street light conversion project
financing LTGO bond issuance (See 8.b.)
Page 94 of 149
9d. - LED street light conversion project
financing LTGO bond issuance (See 8.b.)
Page 95 of 149
9d. - LED street light conversion project
financing LTGO bond issuance (See 8.b.)
Page 96 of 149
9d. - LED street light conversion project
financing LTGO bond issuance (See 8.b.)
Page 97 of 149
9d. - LED street light conversion project
financing LTGO bond issuance (See 8.b.)
Page 98 of 149
9d. - LED street light conversion project
financing LTGO bond issuance (See 8.b.)
Page 99 of 149
9d. - LED street light conversion project
financing LTGO bond issuance (See 8.b.)
Page 100 of 149
9d. - LED street light conversion project
financing LTGO bond issuance (See 8.b.)
Page 101 of 149
9d. - LED street light conversion project
financing LTGO bond issuance (See 8.b.)
Page 102 of 149
9d. - LED street light conversion project
financing LTGO bond issuance (See 8.b.)
Page 103 of 149
9d. - LED street light conversion project
financing LTGO bond issuance (See 8.b.)
Page 104 of 149
9d. - LED street light conversion project
financing LTGO bond issuance (See 8.b.)
Page 105 of 149
9a. - Entertainment device license fee
code amendment (1st reading 5/6/2013)Page 106 of 149
9a. - Entertainment device license fee
code amendment (1st reading 5/6/2013)Page 107 of 149
9a. - Entertainment device license fee
code amendment (1st reading 5/6/2013)Page 108 of 149
9a. - Entertainment device license fee
code amendment (1st reading 5/6/2013)Page 109 of 149
9a. - Entertainment device license fee
code amendment (1st reading 5/6/2013)Page 110 of 149
9a. - Entertainment device license fee
code amendment (1st reading 5/6/2013)Page 111 of 149
9a. - Entertainment device license fee
code amendment (1st reading 5/6/2013)Page 112 of 149
9a. - Entertainment device license fee
code amendment (1st reading 5/6/2013)Page 113 of 149
9a. - Entertainment device license fee
code amendment (1st reading 5/6/2013)Page 114 of 149
9a. - Entertainment device license fee
code amendment (1st reading 5/6/2013)Page 115 of 149
9a. - Entertainment device license fee
code amendment (1st reading 5/6/2013)Page 116 of 149
9a. - Entertainment device license fee
code amendment (1st reading 5/6/2013)Page 117 of 149
9a. - Entertainment device license fee
code amendment (1st reading 5/6/2013)Page 118 of 149
9a. - Entertainment device license fee
code amendment (1st reading 5/6/2013)Page 119 of 149
9a. - Entertainment device license fee
code amendment (1st reading 5/6/2013)Page 120 of 149
9a. - Entertainment device license fee
code amendment (1st reading 5/6/2013)Page 121 of 149
9a. - Entertainment device license fee
code amendment (1st reading 5/6/2013)Page 122 of 149
9a. - Entertainment device license fee
code amendment (1st reading 5/6/2013)Page 123 of 149
9a. - Entertainment device license fee
code amendment (1st reading 5/6/2013)Page 124 of 149
9a. - Entertainment device license fee
code amendment (1st reading 5/6/2013)Page 125 of 149
9a. - Entertainment device license fee
code amendment (1st reading 5/6/2013)Page 126 of 149
9a. - Entertainment device license fee
code amendment (1st reading 5/6/2013)Page 127 of 149
9a. - Entertainment device license fee
code amendment (1st reading 5/6/2013)Page 128 of 149
9a. - Entertainment device license fee
code amendment (1st reading 5/6/2013)Page 129 of 149
9a. - Entertainment device license fee
code amendment (1st reading 5/6/2013)Page 130 of 149
9a. - Entertainment device license fee
code amendment (1st reading 5/6/2013)Page 131 of 149
9a. - Entertainment device license fee
code amendment (1st reading 5/6/2013)Page 132 of 149
9a. - Entertainment device license fee
code amendment (1st reading 5/6/2013)Page 133 of 149
9a. - Entertainment device license fee
code amendment (1st reading 5/6/2013)Page 134 of 149
9a. - Entertainment device license fee
code amendment (1st reading 5/6/2013)Page 135 of 149
9a. - Entertainment device license fee
code amendment (1st reading 5/6/2013)Page 136 of 149
9a. - Entertainment device license fee
code amendment (1st reading 5/6/2013)Page 137 of 149
9a. - Entertainment device license fee
code amendment (1st reading 5/6/2013)Page 138 of 149
9a. - Entertainment device license fee
code amendment (1st reading 5/6/2013)Page 139 of 149
9a. - Entertainment device license fee
code amendment (1st reading 5/6/2013)Page 140 of 149
9a. - Entertainment device license fee
code amendment (1st reading 5/6/2013)Page 141 of 149
9a. - Entertainment device license fee
code amendment (1st reading 5/6/2013)Page 142 of 149
9a. - Entertainment device license fee
code amendment (1st reading 5/6/2013)Page 143 of 149
9a. - Entertainment device license fee
code amendment (1st reading 5/6/2013)Page 144 of 149
9a. - Entertainment device license fee
code amendment (1st reading 5/6/2013)Page 145 of 149
9a. - Entertainment device license fee
code amendment (1st reading 5/6/2013)Page 146 of 149
9a. - Entertainment device license fee
code amendment (1st reading 5/6/2013)Page 147 of 149
9a. - Entertainment device license fee
code amendment (1st reading 5/6/2013)Page 148 of 149
9a. - Entertainment device license fee
code amendment (1st reading 5/6/2013)Page 149 of 149