HomeMy WebLinkAboutRegular Council Agenda Packet - 25 Nov 2013 - Agenda - PdfAGENDA
RENTON CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
November 25, 2013
Monday, 7 p.m.
1.CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
2.ROLL CALL
3.PROCLAMATION
a. Small Business Saturday - November 30, 2013
4.SPECIAL PRESENTATION
a. Renton Reporter's FilmFrenzy People's Choice Award
5.ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
6.AUDIENCE COMMENT
(Speakers must sign up prior to the Council meeting. Each speaker is allowed five minutes. The
first comment period is limited to one-half hour. The second comment period later on in the
agenda is unlimited in duration.) When you are recognized by the Presiding Officer, please walk to
the podium and state your name and city of residence for the record, SPELLING YOUR LAST NAME.
7.CONSENT AGENDA
The following items are distributed to Councilmembers in advance for study and review, and the
recommended actions will be accepted in a single motion. Any item may be removed for further
discussion if requested by a Councilmember.
a. Approval of Council meeting minutes of 11/18/2013. Council concur.
b. Community and Economic Development Department recommends approval to revise the
amounts of the impact fees collected on behalf of the Issaquah School District to $5,730 for
single-family and $1,097 for multi-family units, the Kent School District to $5,486 for single-
family and $3,378 for multi-family units (no change from 2013), and Renton School District to
$5,455 for single-family and $1,339 for multi-family units; and adopt the 2013 Issaquah School
District Capital Facilities Plan, the Kent School District 2013/2014 through 2018/2019 Capital
Facilities Plan, and the 2013-2019 Renton School District Capital Facilities Plan. Refer to
Finance Committee, set public hearing on 12/9/2013.
c. Community Services Department recommends approval of an interlocal agreement with the
Washington State Department of Commerce to accept $1,067,000 in grant funds for the
Riverview Bridge Replacement project. City match is $100,000. Refer to Finance Committee.
d. Executive Department recommends approval of Addendum No. 2 to CAG-11-031, with Cayce &
Grove, LLC, in the amount of $410,000 to extend public defender services until 6/30/2015.
Refer to Finance Committee.
Page 1 of 181
e. Executive Department recommends approval of the 2014 State Legislative Priorities at a Glance,
including transportation solutions, fiscal stability, economic development, aerospace and
infrastructure funding, public safety and enhancing quality of life, which serve as guidance for
City staff during the State legislative session. Refer to Committee of the Whole.
f. Utility Systems Division submits CAG-13-119, Maplewood Creek and Madsen Creek Sediment
Basin Cleaning project; and requests approval of the project, authorization for final pay estimate
in the amount of $4,380, commencement of a 60-day lien period, and release of retained
amount of $3,632.45 to Kamins Construction, contractor, if all required releases are obtained.
Council concur.
8.UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Topics listed below were discussed in Council committees during the past week. Those topics
marked with an asterisk (*) may include legislation. Committee reports on any topics may be held
by the Chair if further review is necessary.
a. Committee of the Whole: 2013/2014 Mid-Biennium Budget Adjustment*; Supported
Employment for Workers with Developmental Disabilities; City Center Community Plan Annual
Report
b. Community Services Committee: Alvord Appointment to Airport Advisory Committee
c. Public Safety Committee: Interlocal Agreement with Washington State Criminal Justice Training
Center*
d. Transportation (Aviation) Committee: Donation of Erwin & Scott S. Carr Rd. Properties*
9.RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
Resolution:
a. Interlocal agreement with Washington State Criminal Justice Center regarding police officer
instructor services (See 8.c.)
Ordinances for first reading:
a. Establishing the 2014 property tax levy (See 8.a.)
b. Decreasing water utility tax (See 8.a.)
c. 2013/2014 Mid-biennium budget adjustment (See 8.a.)
d. Deed of donation from Erwin & Scott for S. Carr Rd. properties (See 8.d.)
10.NEW BUSINESS
(Includes Council Committee agenda topics; call 425-430-6512 for recorded information.)
11.AUDIENCE COMMENT
12.ADJOURNMENT
Page 2 of 181
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE AGENDA
(Preceding Council Meeting)
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
November 25, 2013
Monday, 5:45 p.m.
Supported Employment for Workers with Developmental Disabilities;
City Center Community Plan Annual Report;
Councilmember Taylor's Reimbursement Request
• Hearing assistance devices for use in the Council Chambers are available upon request to the City Clerk •
CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS ARE TELEVISED LIVE ON GOVERNMENT ACCESS CHANNEL 21 AND ARE RECABLECAST:
Tues. & Thurs. at 11 AM & 9 PM, Wed. & Fri at 9 AM & 7 PM and Sat. & Sun. at 1 PM & 9 PM
Page 3 of 181
3a. - Small Business Saturday - November
30, 2013 Page 4 of 181
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Subject/Title:
2014 School Impact Fees
Meeting:
Regular Council - 25 Nov 2013
Exhibits:
l Issue Paper
l Renton School District CFP
l Issaquah School District CFP
l Kent School District CFP
l Draft Ordinance
Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board:
Community and Economic Development
Staff Contact:
Rocale Timmons, x7219
Recommended Action:
Refer to Finance Committee and set Public
Hearing on December 9, 2013
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required: $ 0 Transfer Amendment: $0
Amount Budgeted: $ 0 Revenue Generated: $0
Total Project Budget: $ 0 City Share Total Project: $ 0
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
Renton Municipal Code 4-1-160 J requires the annual review of the Issaquah, Kent, and Renton School
Districts’ Capital Facilities Plan and assessed impact fee. Issaquah has recommended a $1,992
increase in the single-family impact fee for the upcoming year to $5,730. In addition, the school district
is now requesting to collect a new impact fee for multi-family units this year in the amount of $1,097.
Kent has recommended the continuation of the same fee of $5,486 per new single-family home and
$3,378 for multi-family units. Renton has recommended a $940 decrease in the single-family impact fee
for the upcoming year to $5,455 amd a $31 increase in the fee for multi-family units to the bring the
total amount to $1,339.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
• Set Public Hearing on December 9, 2013; and adopt the Issaquah School District 2013 Capital
Facilities Plan and requested fees; and adopt the Kent School District 2013/2014 – 2018/2019 Capital
Facilities Plan and requested fees; and adopt the 2013-2019 Renton School District Capital Facilities
Plan and approve the collection of the requested fees.
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 5 of 181
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY
AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE:November 25, 2013
TO:Randy Corman, Council President
Members of the Renton City Council
VIA:Denis Law, Mayor
FROM:Chip Vincent, Administrator
STAFF CONTACT:Rocale Timmons, Senior Planner, x7219
SUBJECT:2014 School District Impact Fees
ISSUE:
Should the City of Renton update school impact fees for the Issaquah, Kent, and
Renton School Districts?
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the updating of School Impact fees for the Issaquah, Kent, and
Renton School Districts.
BACKGROUND SUMMARY:
Washington’s Growth Management Act authorizes the collection of impact fees to help
ensure that those responsible for growth pay a fair share for the cost of new facilities
needed to support new growth. School impact fees are assessed on newly built
household units and can only be used to support the capital costs of expanded existing
or building new facilities. Operations and maintenance costs are not eligible expenses
for impact fees. Impact fees can be assessed to support a number of different capital
funds that are needed to support growth. Commonly, impact fees are collected for
things such as improvements to schools, parks, and transportation systems. The
amount collected for an impact fee is based upon a Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) that
must show that there is a need for capital projects due to growth.
In November 1999, the City adopted Ordinance No. 4804, which added a new section to
Title IV entitled “School Impact Fees”. This section authorized the City to collect school
impact fees for the Issaquah School District (ISD) and provided for an annual review of
the fee structure. Last year, the Council approved the collection of $3,738 on behalf of
the Issaquah School District for each new single-family dwelling built within the District’s
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 6 of 181
Randy Corman, Council President
Page 2 of 2
November 25, 2013
boundaries. This year, the Issaquah School District has asked for an increase in the
single-family fee to $5,730. In addition, the school district is now requesting to collect
an impact fee for multi-family units this year in the amount of $1,097. The multi-family
fee is being requested due to an increase in the multi-family generation factor which is
being driven by an increase in two and three bedroom units in their service area. Plans
in the 2013 Capital Facilities Plan include the expansion of one elementary, one-middle,
and three high school facilities. A bond measure, in the amount of $219 million to fund
capital improvement projects throughout the district was passed in April of 2012.
Given the likelihood of annexation of land to the City of Renton within the boundaries of
the Kent School District (KSD), Council authorized the collection of an impact fee for new
single-family and multi-family homes. The KSD is requesting to continue the collection
of the same fee of $5,486 per new single-family home. Additionally, the District is
requesting the continuation of the collection of the fee for new multi-family units in the
amount to $3,378 for the upcoming year. The District’s 2013/2014 – 2018/2019 CFP
includes the addition of facilities that would serve current and future Renton residents
(within the PAA), which includes the expansion of an existing elementary, in addition to
the acquisition of a site for a new elementary school. The adjustment of the KSD, based
on current economic conditions, results in no change to the current impact fees.
The Renton School District is requesting a $940 decrease in the fee for single-family
homes the upcoming year, to bring the total amount to $5,455 per new single-family
home. Additionally, the District is requesting a $31 increase in the fee for new multi-
family units, to bring the total amount to $1,339 for the upcoming year. The District’s
2013 – 2019 Capital Facilities Plan includes the addition of facilities that would serve
current and future Renton residents, which includes additional elementary and middle
school facilities. RSD serves as primary district liaison with five municipalities and
jurisdictions: cities of Renton, Bellevue, Tukwila, Newcastle, and unincorporated King
County. The District’s impact fees have been adopted by unincorporated King County
and the City of Newcastle. The District’s request for an enabling code amendment was
put on the Code Amendment docket last year for the City of Bellevue, but was not
initiated by the Council due to the higher prioritization of light rail code amendments
and shoreline master plan updates. Impact fees are still being pursued in the City of
Tukwila. However, it is unlikely that any residential development will occur within
District boundaries within the next 15 years.
cc: Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer
Chip Vincent, CED Administrator
Iwen Wang, FIT Administrator
Neil Watts, Development Services Director
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 7 of 181
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 8 of 181
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 9 of 181
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 10 of 181
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 11 of 181
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 12 of 181
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 13 of 181
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 14 of 181
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 15 of 181
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 16 of 181
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 17 of 181
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 18 of 181
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 19 of 181
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 20 of 181
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 21 of 181
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 22 of 181
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 23 of 181
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 24 of 181
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 25 of 181
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 26 of 181
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 27 of 181
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 28 of 181
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 29 of 181
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 30 of 181
2013 – 2014 - 2018 – 2019
April 2013
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 31 of 181
Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2013
SIX - YEAR CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2013 - 2014 ~ 2018 - 2019
April 2013
Kent School District No. 415
12033 SE 256th Street
Kent, Washington 98030-6643
(253) 373-7295
BOARD of DIRECTORS
Ms. Debbie Straus, President
Mr. Tim Clark, Vice President
Ms. Agda Burchard, Legislative Representative
Ms. Karen DeBruler, Director
Mr. Russ Hanscom, Director
ADMINISTRATION
Dr. Edward Lee Vargas
Superintendent of Schools
Dr. Richard A. Stedry, Chief Business Officer
Ralph Fortunato, CSBS, Director of Fiscal Services
Fred Long, Director of Facilities Services
Gwenn Escher-Derdowski, Planning Administrator
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 32 of 181
Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2013
Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan
Table of Contents
Section
Page Number
I
Executive Summary
2
I I
Six-Year Enrollment Projection & History
4
I I I
District Standard of Service
8
I V
Inventory, Capacity & Maps of Existing Schools
11
V
Six-Year Planning & Construction Plan – Site Map
14
V I
Relocatable Classrooms
17
V I I
Projected Classroom Capacity
18
V I I I
Finance Plan, Cost Basis and Impact Fee Schedules
23
I X
Summary of Changes to Previous Plan
30
X
Appendixes
31
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 33 of 181
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 34 of 181
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 35 of 181
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 36 of 181
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 37 of 181
7b
.
-
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
a
n
d
E
c
o
n
o
m
i
c
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
D
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
r
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
s
Pa
g
e
3
8
o
f
1
8
1
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 39 of 181
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 40 of 181
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 41 of 181
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 42 of 181
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 43 of 181
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 44 of 181
NKe
n
t
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
S
i
x
-
Y
e
a
r
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
Ap
r
i
l
2
0
1
3
P
a
g
e
1
3
Kent School District No. 415
Serving residents of
Unincorporated King County
City of Kent
City of Renton
City of Auburn
City of Sea Tac
City of Covington
City of Maple Valley
City of Black Diamond
28 Elementary Schools
6 Middle Schools
4 Senior High Schools
Kent Mountain View Academy (Grades 3-12)
Kent Phoenix Academy (9-12)
Mill CreekMiddle School
Kent-MeridianHigh School
Carriage CrestElementary
GlenridgeElementarySpringbrookElementary
Emerald ParkElementary
Soos CreekElementary SunriseElementary
Kentridge High School
Lake YoungsElementary
RidgewoodElementary
FairwoodElementary
Lake Desire
Lake Youngs
Park OrchardElementary
Panther LakeElementary
East HillElementary DanielElementary
MartinSortunElementary
Scenic HillElementary
MillenniumElementary
AdministrationCenter
Kent PhoenixAcademy
MeridianMiddle School
MeridianElementary
Lake Meridian
Meadow RidgeElementary Pine TreeElementary
HorizonElementary CovingtonElementary
JenkinsCreekElementary
Cedar ValleyElementary
CrestwoodElementary
MattsonMiddle School
KentlakeHigh School
KentwoodHigh School
Sawyer WoodsElementary
LakeSawyer
LakeMorton
Pipe Lake
Grass LakeElementary
Cedar HeightsMiddle School
KentElementary
Neely O'BrienElementary
Meeker Middle School
NorthwoodMiddle School
SE Petrovitsky Rd
SE 256th St
SE 240th StSE 240th St
K
e
n
t
-
B
l
a
c
k
D
i
a
m
o
n
d
R
d
S 212th St
SE 272nd St
Kent-Kangley Road
Highw
a
y
1
8
Highw
a
y
1
8
1
3
2
n
d
A
v
e
S
E
1
3
2
n
d
A
v
e
S
E
16
4
t
h
A
v
e
S
E
1
0
4
t
h
A
v
e
S
E
10
8
t
h
A
v
e
S
E
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
A
v
e
We
s
t
V
a
l
l
e
y
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
Hig
h
w
a
y
1
6
7
1
4
0
t
h
A
v
e
S
E
In
t
e
r
s
t
a
t
e
5
SE 208th St
K
e
n
t-
D
e
s
M
oin
e
s Rd
SE C o v i n g t on-Sawyer Rd.
KentMountain ViewAcademy
7b
.
-
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
a
n
d
E
c
o
n
o
m
i
c
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
D
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
r
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
s
Pa
g
e
4
5
o
f
1
8
1
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 46 of 181
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 47 of 181
1
2
4
611
12
10
9
13
5
N
3
7
8
SE 192nd St
Carriage CrestElementary
GlenridgeElementarySpringbrookElementary
Emerald ParkElementary
Soos CreekElementary SunriseElementary
Kentridge High School
Lake YoungsElementary
RidgewoodElementary
FairwoodElementary
Lake Desire
Lake Youngs
Park OrchardElementary
Panther LakeElementary
Panther LakeReplacement
East HillElementary
DanielElementary
MartinSortunElementary
Scenic HillElementary
MillenniumElementary
AdministrationCenter
Kent PhoenixAcademy
MeridianMiddle School
MeridianElementary
Lake Meridian
Meadow RidgeElementary
Pine TreeElementary
HorizonElementary CovingtonElementary
JenkinsCreekElementary
Cedar ValleyElementary
CrestwoodElementary
MattsonMiddle School
KentlakeHigh School
KentwoodHigh School
Sawyer WoodsElementary
LakeSawyer
LakeMorton
Pipe Lake
Grass LakeElementary
Cedar HeightsMiddle School
KentElementary
Neely O'BrienElementary
Mill CreekMiddle School
Kent-MeridianHighSchool
KentMountain ViewAcademy
Meeker Middle School
NorthwoodMiddle School
SE Petrovitsky Rd
SE 256th St
SE 240th StSE 240th St
K
e
n
t
-
B
l
a
c
k
D
i
a
m
o
n
d
R
d
SE 288th Street
S 212th St
SE 304th Street
SE 272 nd St
Kent-Kangley Road
SE 336th St
Highw
a
y
1
8
13
2
n
d
A
v
e
S
E
13
2
n
d
A
v
e
S
E
16
4
t
h
A
v
e
S
E
10
4
t
h
A
v
e
S
E
10
8
t
h
A
v
e
S
E
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
A
v
e
We
s
t
V
a
l
l
e
y
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
Hig
h
w
a
y
1
6
7
14
0
t
h
A
v
e
S
E
In
t
e
r
s
t
a
t
e
5
SE 208th St
Kent School District No. 415
Site Bank
&
Property Acquisitions
K
e
n
t
-
D
es M
oin
es Rd
S E C o v i ngton-Sawyer Rd.
Ke
n
t
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
S
i
x
-
Y
e
a
r
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
Ap
r
i
l
2
01
3
P
a
g
e
16
7b
.
-
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
a
n
d
E
c
o
n
o
m
i
c
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
D
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
r
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
s
Pa
g
e
4
8
o
f
1
8
1
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 49 of 181
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 50 of 181
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 51 of 181
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 52 of 181
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 53 of 181
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 54 of 181
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 55 of 181
7b
.
-
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
a
n
d
E
c
o
n
o
m
i
c
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
D
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
r
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
s
Pa
g
e
5
6
o
f
1
8
1
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 57 of 181
7b
.
-
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
a
n
d
E
c
o
n
o
m
i
c
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
D
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
r
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
s
Pa
g
e
5
8
o
f
1
8
1
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 59 of 181
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 60 of 181
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 61 of 181
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 62 of 181
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 63 of 181
7b
.
-
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
a
n
d
E
c
o
n
o
m
i
c
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
D
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
r
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
s
Pa
g
e
6
4
o
f
1
8
1
7b
.
-
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
a
n
d
E
c
o
n
o
m
i
c
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
D
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
r
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
s
Pa
g
e
6
5
o
f
1
8
1
7b
.
-
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
a
n
d
E
c
o
n
o
m
i
c
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
D
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
r
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
s
Pa
g
e
6
6
o
f
1
8
1
7b
.
-
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
a
n
d
E
c
o
n
o
m
i
c
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
D
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
r
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
s
Pa
g
e
6
7
o
f
1
8
1
SIX-YEAR
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2013-2019
Renton School District No. 403
Board of Directors
Lynn Desmarais, President
Pam Teal, Vice President
Denise Eider
Todd Franceschina
Al Talley
Vera Risdon, Interim Superintendent
March 27, 2013
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 68 of 181
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 69 of 181
SIX-YEAR
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2013-2019
Renton School District No. 403
Board of Directors
Lynn Desmarais, President
Pam Teal, Vice President
Denise Eider
Todd Franceschina
Al Talley
Vera Risdon, Interim Superintendent
The Renton School District Capital Facilities Plan was prepared with the help of the following
organizations and individuals:
Renton School District Staff
John Knutson, Assistant Superintendent, Business Operations
Richard Stracke, Executive Director, Facilities and Planning
Tracy Patterson, Manager, Business Office
The 2013 – 2019 Capital Facilities Plan was adopted by the Renton
School District Board of Directors on March 27, 2013
March 27, 2013
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 70 of 181
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 71 of 181
SIX-YEAR
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2013-2019
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
II. CAPACITY METHODOLOGY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
III. INVENTORY AND CAPACITY OF FACILTIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
IV. ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
V. ENROLLMENT DRIVEN FACILITY NEEDS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
VI. SIX-YEAR FINANCE PLAN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
XII. IMPACT FEES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
XIII. APPENDICES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 72 of 181
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 73 of 181
Capital Facilities Plan 2013 - 2019 Renton School District No. 403
- 1 -
I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan (the “Plan”) was prepared by Renton School District
(the “District”) in compliance with the requirements of the Washington State Growth
Management Act (GMA, the Act), King County Code Title 21A.43, and applicable
ordinances of the cities of Renton, Newcastle and Bellevue. It is the intent of the District
that the Plan be adopted by King County and the cities of Bellevue, Newcastle and Renton
as a sub-element of the Capital Facilities Plan element of their respective Comprehensive
Plans, so that those municipalities may assess and collect school impact fees on behalf of
the District, as empowered by the GMA. However, this Plan is not intended to be the sole
planning instrument developed by the District to determine its capital facility needs.
The GMA was adopted by the State legislature in 1990 in response to rapidly increasing
development; most notably in King County and the surrounding central Puget Sound area.
The Act requires state and local governments to manage Washington’s growth by
developing and implementing comprehensive land-use and transportation plans, by
designating Urban Growth Areas, and by protecting natural resources and environmentally
critical areas.
One of the elements of the Comprehensive Plan required of county and city governments is
the Capital Facilities Plan. It is this element that addresses existing public facility
capacities, forecasts future public facility needs, presents a plan for expanding existing
facilities or constructing new facilities to meet those needs, and indicates how those public
facility improvements are to be financed. The GMA empowers jurisdictions to assess and
collect impact fees as one means of financing new public facilities necessitated by private
development.
This Capital Facilities Plan addresses the impact of growth on public school facilities by
examining:
1. anticipated growth of the District’s student population over the next six years;
2. the ability of existing and proposed classroom facilities to adequately house those
students based on the District’s current Standard of Service;
3. the need for additional enrollment driven capital facilities;
4. the method of financing those capital improvements; and
5. the calculation of school impact fees based on, among other variables, the number
of students generated by recent residential development (student generation
factors).
This plan is updated annually and submitted to local governments for inclusion as a sub-
element of their Capital Facilities Plans. Past Plans have been adopted by King County and
the City of Renton. The District is actively working with the City of Newcastle on the
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 74 of 181
Capital Facilities Plan 2013 - 2019 Renton School District No. 403
- 2 -
implementation of impact fees within its jurisdiction, and is engaged in dialogue with the
cities of Bellevue and Tukwila towards that end.
Enrollment Projections:
Enrollment projections provided by the Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction
(OSPI) indicate a 20.2% increase in K-12 student enrollment over the next six years, with
the highest growth rate, 31.0%, occurring at the K-5 level. Projected K-12 enrollment for
the 2018-2019 school year is 17,478, an increase of 2,933 over the actual October 1, 2012
headcount of 14,545.
Current Capacity:
Student capacity of current permanent facilities, excluding designated special education
classrooms and facilities, is 15,387. Based on current enrollment, the District is showing a
deficit of permanent facilities at both the Elementary and Middle School levels and a
surplus at the High School level. Current deficits are overcome by the use of relocatable
classrooms (portables), which are not included in the permanent facility inventory.
Relocatable classrooms are used to address enrollment fluctuations and to house students
on a temporary basis until permanent facilities can be constructed. They are not considered
a long-term solution for housing students.
Enrollment Projections/Future Capacity:
Based on enrollment projections prepared by OSPI, significant increases are anticipated at
all grade levels over the next six years. Existing surplus capacity at the High School level
appears sufficient to cover projected student growth at that level. However, growth at the
elementary and middle school levels will require construction of new permanent facilities
as well as the reallocation or acquisition of relocatable classrooms.
With the passage of the 2012 Bond Measure this past April, funding was secured for the
design and construction of the new Middle School No. 4, scheduled to open Fall 2016.
With a student capacity of 850, the new facility will result in a surplus capacity of 485
students in 2018, based on OSPI enrollment projections. Those same enrollment
projections indicate a deficit in elementary school facility capacity of 2,363 by the year
2018. While the 2012 bond measure does address the acquisition of property for future
elementary school construction, current and future deficits at the elementary level will be
accommodated under this Plan by relocatable classrooms until such time as funding
becomes available.
Capital Construction Plan:
Recently completed construction under the 2008 bond measure includes the Hazen
Classroom Addition and Renovation and the Secondary Learning Center. The new
Meadow Crest Early Childhood Learning Center, also funded by the 2008 Bond, is
scheduled to open September 2013.
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 75 of 181
Capital Facilities Plan 2013 - 2019 Renton School District No. 403
- 3 -
With the passage of the 2012 bond measure in April 2012, the District is moving ahead
with additional capacity driven facility needs including a new Middle School to be located
within the city of Newcastle, acquisition of property for new elementary school
construction and the purchase of additional relocatable classrooms. Although not included
in the 2012 bond measure, construction of a new elementary school will be necessary
during the term of this Plan.
Complete lists of projects covered under the 2008 and 2012 bond measures are included in
the Appendix of the Plan.
Finance Plan:
The primary funding source for capital facilities projects scheduled for the next six years is
the 2012 bond issue approved by voters in April 2012. Other sources of funding include
remaining 2008 bond monies and school impact fees collected by King County and the
cities of Renton, Newcastle, Bellevue and Tukwila (pending adoption of Plan and
establishment of enabling ordinance by the cities of Bellevue and Tukwila).
Impact Fees:
Impact fees were calculated in conformance with King County Council Ordinance 11621,
Attachment A. While the fee on single-family residences has decreased, due primarily to
lower student generation factors, the fee on multi-family residential construction has
increased as a result of the decreased assessed property values, as well as other factors.
As in the past, the District has voluntarily limited any fee increase to the previous year’s
rate of inflation, in this case 2.38%, as reported by the King County Office of Economic
and Financial Analysis. A comparison of current and previous fees is as follows:
Current Year Previous Year Change
Single‐Family $5,455 $6,395 ($940)
Multi‐Family $1,339 $1,308 $31
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 76 of 181
Capital Facilities Plan 2013 - 2019 Renton School District No. 403
- 4 -
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 77 of 181
Capital Facilities Plan 2013 - 2019 Renton School District No. 403
- 5 -
II. CAPACITY METHODOLOGY
STANDARD OF SERVICE
The Renton School District Standard of Service is the standard adopted by the District that
identifies the program year, school organizational structure, student/teacher ratios by grade
level (taking into account the requirements of students with special needs), daily class
schedule, types of facilities and other factors identified by the District to be beneficial in
supporting its educational programs and objectives. The Standard of Service is the major
determining factor, together with the number of classrooms or teaching stations, in
calculating facility capacity.
The District has adopted a traditional elementary/middle/high school organizational
structure that houses kindergarten through Grade 5 in elementary schools, Grades 6 through
8 in middle schools and Grades 9 through 12 in high schools. The school-year calendar
adopted by the District is also traditional, beginning in early September and ending in mid-
June, as is the daily schedule, with classes beginning between 7:20 and 9:30 a.m. and
ending between 2:03 and 3:10 p.m., dependent on grade level.
The District and the Renton Education Association recognize that reasonable class size is
necessary for optimum learning, and have established the following class size limits:
Primary (K-3) 24:1
Intermediate (4-5) 29:1
Secondary (6-12) 29:1
The 29:1 ratio at the secondary level applies to all Language Arts, Social Studies, Science,
Math, World Languages, World Language Exploratory and Health classes. Other ratios
apply as follows:
Choir/Band/Orchestra 40:1
Middle School PE 35:1
High School PE 40:1
All other classes 31:1
Student /teacher ratios for special education classes held in self-contained classrooms are
not addressed in this Plan. Similarly, educational facilities dedicated solely to special
education programs or alternative learning strategies are excluded from these capacity
calculations, as are associated student headcounts.
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 78 of 181
Capital Facilities Plan 2013 - 2019 Renton School District No. 403
- 6 -
Above student/teacher ratios are applicable to both permanent and relocatable classrooms.
However, inasmuch as relocatable facilities do not generally allow for the full range of
educational activities promoted by the District, they are generally viewed as temporary or
interim housing, necessary to accommodate enrollment fluctuations and development
driven enrollment increases, but only until such time as permanent facilities can be
financed and constructed. They are not viewed as a long-term solution to rising enrollment
or deficit facility capacity. For those reasons, capacities of relocatable classrooms are
calculated, but not used to determine future facility needs.
PRACTICAL CAPACITY MODEL
The Practical Capacity Model calculates student capacity based on limitations that existing
facilities place on enrollment due to existing educational programs, operating policy and
contractual restrictions.
The calculation is made by reviewing the use of each room in each facility. For every
room housing students, a calculation is made assigning a maximum number of students per
room. Sometimes core facilities, such as size of cafeteria or size of gym, number of
restrooms or size and number of specialty areas such as shops, limit enrollment to levels
below that expected by room occupancy levels.
Capacity at the secondary school level is further limited by scheduling limitations and
student course selection. If rooms are utilized by staff for their planning period in a six
period day, capacity is limited to 83% (5/6) of the theoretical capacity. Since secondary
schools offer a number of elective courses, many courses will not attract a full classroom of
students.
Another factor that highly influences facility capacity at the elementary school level is half-
day versus full-day Kindergarten. Kindergarten classroom capacity, for the purpose of this
Plan, is based on actual October 1, 2012 headcount, of which 15.5% were identified as full-
day and 84.5% as half-day. Should, in the future, the State mandate 100% full-day
Kindergarten, the impact would be significant. Based on current enrollment, the District
would require an additional 20 kindergarten classrooms, and to accommodate projected
2018-2019 enrollment would require an additional 15, for a total 35 classrooms in the next
six years, just to house Kindergarten students.
A complete inventory of District facilities, including capacities, is provided in Section III.
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 79 of 181
Capital Facilities Plan 2013 - 2019 Renton School District No. 403
- 7 -
III. INVENTORY AND CAPACITY OF FACILITIES
Renton School District’s capital facilities include both permanent structures and relocatable
(portable) classrooms. Permanent facilities are further categorized as either K-12 (standard
elementary, middle and high school configurations), Special Education or non-instructional
Support Facilities. The District maintains a total of 30 permanent and 45 relocatable
facilities serving a student population of 14,545.
The District’s K-12 facilities include 14 elementary schools, 3 middle schools and 3 high
schools. Five Special Education facilities house the District’s early childhood and
alternative education programs. Support facilities include Kohlwes Education Center
(admin.), Transportation Center, Facilities Operations and Maintenance Center, Nutrition
Services/Warehouse, Renton Memorial Stadium and the Lindbergh Swimming Pool. Total
permanent facilities encompass 2,419,425 square feet, with 2,242,009 square feet (93%)
devoted to K-12 and special education. See Appendix A for District Maps.
Relocatable facilities are used primarily to address enrollment fluctuations and to house
students on a temporary basis until permanent facilities can be constructed. For those
reasons they are not considered a long-term solution for housing students and are not
acknowledged in the calculation of the capacity of K-12 facilities. Of the 45 relocatable
facilities in the District’s inventory, 19 are “double portables” containing two classrooms,
providing the district with a total of 64 relocatable classrooms encompassing 57,344 square
feet of additional instructional space.
Table 1 below summarizes existing facility capacity. A complete inventory of District
facilities, including undeveloped property, follows. Facility capacity worksheets may be
found in Appendix B.
Type Elementary
Schools
Middle
Schools
High
Schools Total
Permanent 7,610 3,376 4,711 15,697
Relocatable 744 647 144 1,535
Total 8,354 4,023 4,855 17,232
EXISTING FACILITY STUDENT CAPACITY
Table 1
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 80 of 181
Capital Facilities Plan 2013 - 2019 Renton School District No. 403
- 8 -
INVENTORY AND CAPACITY OF PERMANENT FACILITIES
NAME LOCATION AREA (sq. ft.)CAPACITY
Benson Hill 18665 ‐ 116TH Ave. SE, Renton, WA 98058 65,165 615
Bryn Mawr 8212 S 118th St., Seattle, WA 98178 47,924 483
Campbell Hill 6418 S 124th St., Seattle, WA 98178 55,624 402
Cascade 16022 ‐ 116th Ave. SE, Renton, WA 98058 57,121 577
Hazelwood 7100 ‐ 116th Ave. SE, Newcastle, WA 98056 64292 615
Highlands 2727 NE 7th St., Renton, WA 98056 58,995 635
Honey Dew 800 Union Ave. NE, Renton, WA 98059 52,120 473
Kennydale 1700 NE 28th st., Renton, WA 98056 63,481 658
Lakeridge 7400 S 115th St., Seattle, WA 98178 51,118 425
Maplewood Heights 130 Jericho Ave., Renton, WA 98059 54,634 544
Renton Park 16828 ‐ 128th Ave. SE, Renton, WA 98058 64,803 587
Sierra Heights 2501 Union Ave. NE, Renton, WA 98058 52,415 587
Talbot Hill 2300 Talbot Road, Renton, WA 98055 55,344 540
Tiffany Park 1601 Lake Youngs Way, Renton, WA 98058 56,258 469
Total Grades K‐5 Capacity 799,294 7,610
Dimmitt 12320 ‐ 80th Ave. S, Seattle 98178 109,071 1,154
McKnight 2600 NE 12th St., Renton, WA 98056 126,706 1,154
Nelsen 2403 Jones Ave. S, Renton, WA 98055 124,234 1,069
Total Grades 6‐8 Capacity 360,011 3,377
Hazen 1101 Hoquiam Ave. NE, Renton, WA 98059 327,395 1,643
Lindbergh 16426 ‐ 128th Ave. SE, Renton, WA 98058 242,662 1,304
Renton 400 S 2nd St., Renton, WA 98057 283,615 1,763
Total Grades 9‐12 Capacity 853,672 4,710
Total Grade Levels K‐12 2,012,977 15,697
Hillcrest Special Service Cente1800 Index Ave. NE, Renton, WA 98056 39,058
Sartori Education Center 315 Garden Ave. N, Renton, WA 98057 39,345
Secondary Learning Center 7800 S 132nd St., Renton, WA 98178 69,061
Spring Glen Special Services 2607 Jones Ave. S, Renton, WA 98055 31,144
Renton Academy 6928 116th Ave. SE, Newcastle, WA 98056 50,424
Total Special Education 229,032
Facilities Operations Center 7812 S 124th St., Seattle, WA 98178 21,894
Kohlwes Educational Center 300 SW 7th St., Renton, WA 98055 57,000
Lindbergh Pool 16740 ‐ 128th Ave. SE, Renton, WA 98058 13,600
Purchasing & Food Services 409 S Tobin St., Renton, WA 98057 27,466
Renton Memorial Stadium 405 Logan Ave. N, Renton, WA 98055 37,213
Transportation Center 420 Park Ave. N, Renton, WA 98057 20,243
Total Support Services 177,416
Total All Permanent Facilities 2,419,425
MI
D
D
L
E
SC
H
O
O
L
S
EL
E
M
E
N
T
A
T
Y
SC
H
O
O
L
S
HI
G
H
SC
H
O
O
L
S
SP
E
C
I
A
L
ED
U
C
A
T
I
O
N
SU
P
P
O
R
T
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 81 of 181
Capital Facilities Plan 2013 - 2019 Renton School District No. 403
- 9 -
BLDG. ID LOCATION
NUMBER OF
CLASSROOMS
AREA
(sq.ft.)
STUDENT
CAPACITY
5Lakeridge Elementary 1 896 24
6Lakeridge Elementary 1 896 24
12 Lakeridge Elementary 1 896 24
13 Bryn Mawr Elementary 1 896 24
16 Maplewood Heights Elementary 1 896 24
17 Sierra Heights Elementary 1 896 24
19 Maplewood Heights Elementary 1 896 24
20 Lindbergh High 1 896 24
27 Sierra Heights Elementary 1 896 24
34 Maplewood Heights Elementary 1 896 24
53 McKnight Middle 2 1,792 56
54 Nelsen Middle 2 1,792 56
55 Nelsen Middle 2 1,792 56
56 Nelsen Middle 2 1,792 56
57 Nelsen Middle 2 1,792 56
58 Maplewood Heights Elementary 1 896 24
59 Lindbergh High 1 896 24
60 Lindbergh High 1 896 24
61 Lindbergh High 1 896 24
62 Talbot Hill Elementary 1 896 24
63 Cascade Elementary 1 896 24
64 Talbot Hill Elementary 1 896 24
65 Dimmitt Middle 1 896 28
66 Dimmitt Middle 1 896 28
67 Bryn Mawr Elementary 1 896 24
68 Sierra Heights Elementary 1 896 24
69 Honeydew Elementary 2 1,792 48
70 Talbot Hill Elementary 1 896 24
71 Sierra Heights Elementary 1 896 24
72 McKnight Middle 2 1,792 56
73 Lakeridge Elementary 2 1,792 48
74 Sierra Heights Elementary 2 1,792 48
75 Spring Glen 2 1,792 20
76 Spring Glen 2 1,792 20
77 McKnight Middle 2 1,792 56
78 McKnight Middle 2 1,792 56
79 Dimmitt Middle 2 1,792 56
80 Honeydew Elementary 2 1,792 48
81 Cascade Elementary 2 1,792 48
82 Sierra Heights Elementary 2 1,792 48
83 Lindbergh High 2 1,792 48
84 Maplewood Heights Elementary 2 1,792 48
85 Dimmitt Middle 1 896 28
86 Dimmitt Middle 1 896 28
87 Dimmitt Middle 1 896 28
Totals 64 57,344 1,575
INVENTORY AND CAPACITY OF RELOCATABLE CLASSROOMS
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 82 of 181
Capital Facilities Plan 2013 - 2019 Renton School District No. 403
- 10 -
LOCATION ADDRESS
RELOCATABLE
FACILITY ID
AREA
(sq. ft.)CAPACITY
ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS
Bryn Mawr 8212 S 118th St., Seattle 98178 13, 67 1,792 48
Cascade 16022 116th Ave. SE, Renton 98058 63, 81 2,688 72
Honeydew 800 Union Ave. NE, Renton 98059 69, 80 3,584 96
Lakeridge 7400 S 115th St., Seattle 98178 5, 6, 12, 73 4,480 120
Maplewood Heights 130 Jericho Ave. SE, Renton 98059 16, 19, 34, 58, 84 5,376 144
Sierra Heights 2501 Union Ave. NE, Renton 98059 17, 27, 68, 71, 74, 82 7,168 192
Talbot Hill 2300 Talbot Rd. S, Renton 98055 62, 64, 70 2,688 72
Elementary School Total 27,776 744
MIDDLE SCHOOLS
Dimmitt 12320 80th Ave. S, Seattle 98078 55, 56, 79, 85, 86, 87 6,272 197
McKnight 1200 Edmonds Ave. NE, Renton 98056 53, 72, 77, 78 7,168 225
Nelsen 2403 Jones Ave. S, Renton 98055 54, 55, 56, 57 7,168 225
Middle School Total 20,608 647
HIGH SCHOOLS
Lindbergh 16426 128th Ave. SE, Renton 98058 20, 59, 60, 61, 83 5,376 144
High School Total 5,376 144
SPECIAL EDUCATION
Spring Glen 2706 Jones Ave. S, Renton 98055 75, 76 3,584 40
Special Education Total 3,584 40
TOTAL ALL RELOCATABLE CLASSROOMS 57,344 1,575
RELOCATABLE FACILITY CAPACITY BY SITE
The District also owns several parcels of undeveloped property throughout the District
totaling 38.51 acres.
UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY
Cascade M.S. Site 21.9 acres SE 18th & Olympia Ave. SE
Lake Boren Site 8.76 acres SE 78th Pl. on 126th Ave. SE
Renton Center Site 3.67 acres 509 Rainier Avenue S
Skyway Site 4.18 acres NW corner S Langston Rd. & 76th Ave. S
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 83 of 181
Capital Facilities Plan 2013 - 2019 Renton School District No. 403
- 11 -
IV. ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS
Renton School District enrollment projections through the 2018-19 school year (on the
following page) are based on data published by the Office of the Superintendent of Public
Instruction (OSPI), with the data reconfigured to reflect the District’s elementary, middle
and high school grade level configurations. OSPI utilizes the cohort survival method to
forecast student enrollment projections for a six-year period based on actual student
headcounts documented for the previous six years. Enrollment reports prepared by the
District are submitted to OSPI on an annual basis (District’s October 1, 2012 report and
OSPI Report No. 1049 are included in Appendix B).
Current projections indicate significant increased enrollment over the next six years,
especially at the elementary school grade levels, with somewhat lesser growth at the middle
and high school grade levels (Table 2). Compared to actual enrollment growth over the
past six years, anticipated growth is more than double what the District experienced from
2007 to the present.
`
ENROLLMENT GROWTH
2007 2012 INCREASE % 2013 2018 INCREASE %
Elementary 6,391 7,092 701 11.0 7,414 9,292 1,878 25.3
Middle 3,129 3,312 183 5.8 3,277 3,758 481 14.7
High 4,036 4,141 105 2.6 4,189 4,428 239 5.7
Total 13,556 14,545 989 7.3 14,880 17,478 2,598 17.5
ACTUAL GROWTH 2007-2012 PROJECTED GROWTH 2012-2018
Table 2
By the school year 2018-2019, the District expects an overall student enrollment increase
of 17.5%, with a 25.3% increase at the elementary school level, a 14.7% increase at the
middle school level and a 5.7 % increase at the high school level.
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 84 of 181
Capital Facilities Plan 2013 – 2019 Renton School District No. 403
- 12 -
AVE. %
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 SURVIVAL 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Kindergarten 1,007 1,080 1,129 1,187 1,283 1,266 1,355 1,411 1,467 1,523 1,579 1,635
Grade 1 1,113 1,059 1,138 1,170 1,193 1,284 102.94 1,303 1,395 1,452 1,510 1,568 1,625
Grade 2 1,088 1,143 1,100 1,142 1,184 1,219 102.01 1,310 1,329 1,423 1,481 1,540 1,600
Grade 3 1,119 1,105 1,152 1,112 1,130 1,129 99.54 1,213 1,304 1,323 1,416 1,474 1,533
Grade 4 1,022 1,147 1,122 1,149 1,109 1,098 100.14 1,131 1,215 1,306 1,325 1,418 1,476
Grade 5 1,042 1,058 1,155 1,103 1,156 1,096 100.38 1,102 1,135 1,220 1,311 1,330 1,423
Total K ‐ 5 6,391 6,592 6,796 6,863 7,055 7,092 7,414 7,789 8,191 8,566 8,909 9,292
Grade 6 1,051 1,022 1,025 1,118 1,063 1,124 97.08 1,064 1,070 1,102 1,184 1,273 1,291
Grade7 1,087 1,064 1,011 1,037 1,119 1,087 100.71 1,132 1,072 1,078 1,110 1,192 1,282
Grade 8 991 1,069 1,070 1,020 1,025 1,101 99.42 1,081 1,125 1,066 1,072 1,104 1,185
Total 6 ‐ 8 3,129 3,155 3,106 3,175 3,207 3,312 3,277 3,267 3,246 3,366 3,569 3,758
Grade 9 1,059 1,255 1,356 1,319 1,256 1,148 122.37 1,347 1,323 1,377 1,304 1,312 1,351
Grade 10 1,035 990 1,028 1,109 1,083 1,142 86.00 987 1,158 1,138 1,184 1,121 1,128
Grade 11 1,078 1,005 940 938 987 957 92.15 1,052 910 1,067 1,049 1,091 1,033
Grade 12 864 793 779 829 843 894 83.94 803 883 764 896 881 916
Total 9 ‐ 12 4,036 4,043 4,103 4,195 4,169 4,141 4,189 4,274 4,346 4,433 4,405 4,428
Total K ‐12 13,556 13,790 14,005 14,233 14,431 14,545 14,880 15,330 15,783 16,365 16,883 17,478
* Information obtained from OSPI Report No. 1049, December 4, 2012
‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ACTUAL ENROLLMENT ON OCTOBER FIRST ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ PROJECTED ENROLLMENTS ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS BY COHORT SURVIVAL*
(KK Linear Projection)
RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 403
7b
.
-
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
a
n
d
E
c
o
n
o
m
i
c
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
D
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
r
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
s
Pa
g
e
8
5
o
f
1
8
1
Capital Facilities Plan 2013 - 2019 Renton School District No. 403
- 13 -
V. ENROLLMENT DRIVEN FACILITY NEEDS
Table 3 compares the current capacity of Renton School District facilities to OSPI’s
projected enrollment for the school year 2018-2019. The table indicates a significant deficit
of 1,682 at the elementary level and a much less imposing deficit of 381 at the middle
school level. Only at the high school level is the current capacity adequate to handle
projected 2018 -2019 enrollment.
PROJECTED CAPACITY NEEDS 1
Type of Facility Current
Capacity
Current
Enrollment
2018-19 Projected
Enrollment
2018-19
Surplus/Deficit
Elementary School 7,610 7,092 9,292 (1,682)
Middle School 3,377 3,312 3,758 (381)
High School 4,710 4,141 4,428 282
Total 15,697 14,545 17,478 (1,781)
1 Excludes relocatable and special education facilities
Table 3
The 2012 Bond Measure, approved by District voters in April 2012, includes several
measures specifically targeting these deficits. A summary of the 2012 Bond Measure can be
found in Appendix D.
Middle School No. 4, currently in the design phase and scheduled to open in Fall 2016, will
provide the necessary capacity to handle projected enrollment up to and beyond the six-year
period addressed by this Plan. The new middle school will be constructed at the present
Renton Academy site.
At the elementary school level, the 2012 Bond Measure provides for the acquisition of
property for future development, but does not include necessary funding for construction of
new elementary facilities. Passage of a special levy may be essential to mitigating the
projected elementary school deficit. Remaining deficits at the elementary school level will
have to be addressed temporarily by the use of relocatable classrooms; either new or
relocated from other facilities. These costs must also be included in the Six-Year Finance
Plan.
The Increased Capacity Plan on the following page illustrates current capacities and
proposed increased capacities in response to projected enrollment increases. Projected
capacity surpluses and deficits are tracked for each year of the six-year period covered by
this Plan, and are calculated both with and without the inclusion of relocatable classrooms.
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 86 of 181
Capital Facilities Plan 2013 - 2019 Renton School District No. 403
- 14 -
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: GRADES K‐5
ACTUAL PROJECTED
PLAN YEAR 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Permanent Capacity 7610 7610 7610 7610 7610 7610 7610
New Construction 550
Total Permanent Capacity 7610 7610 7610 7610 7610 7610 8160
Relocatable Capacity 744 744 744 744 744 1032 1320
New/Relocated Capacity 288 288
Total Relocatable Capacity 744 744 744 744 1032 1320 1320
Enrollment 7092 7414 7789 8191 8566 8909 9292
Surplus/(Deficit)
Permanent only 518 196 (179) (581) (956) (1299) (1132)
Surplus/(Deficit)
Permanent & Relocatable 1262 940 565 163 76 21 188
MIDDLE SCHOOL: GRADES 6‐8
ACTUAL PROJECTED
PLAN YEAR 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Permanent Capacity 3293 3293 3293 3293 3293 4143 4143
New Construction 850
Total Permanent Capacity 3293 3293 3293 3293 4143 4143 4143
Relocatable Capacity 647 647 647 647 647 0 0
New/Relocated Capacity (647)
Total Relocatable Capacity 647647647647000
Enrollment 3228 3277 3267 3246 3366 3569 3758
Surplus/(Deficit)
Permanent only 65 16 26 47 777 574 385
Surplus/(Deficit)
Permanent & Relocatable 712 663 673 694 777 574 385
HIGH SCHOOL: GRADES 9‐12
ACTUAL PROJECTED
PLAN YEAR 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Permanent Capacity 4710 4710 4710 4710 4710 4710 4710
New Construction
Total Permanent Capacity 4710 4710 4710 4710 4710 4710 4710
Relocatable Capacity 144 144 144 144 144 144 144
New/Relocated Capacity
Total Relocatable Capacity 144 144 144 144 144 144 144
Enrollment 1 3844 3887 3966 4033 4114 4088 4109
Surplus/(Deficit)
Permanent only 866 823 744 677 596 622 601
Surplus/(Deficit)
Permanent & Relocatable 1010 967 888 821 740 766 745
1. OSPI figures adjusted to account for Secondary Learning Center's classification as an alternative
learning facility not included in this capacity analysis.
INCREASED CAPACITY/CONSTRUCTION PLAN
.
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 87 of 181
Capital Facilities Plan 2013 - 2019 Renton School District No. 403
- 15 -
VI. SIX-YEAR FINANCE PLAN
Capital facilities capacity improvements referenced in this Plan will be funded by 2012
bond monies, remaining 2008 bond funds, impact fees and a possible special levy. The
District may also be eligible for OSPI school construction assistance.
The Meadow Crest Early Childhood Learning Center, currently under construction and
scheduled to be open Fall of 2013, is the final major project to be completed using 2008
bond monies. The major capacity driven project to be funded by the 2012 bond is the new
middle school (Middle School No. 4) currently in the final planning stage and scheduled to
open Fall of 2016. Other capacity related projects to be funded by the 2012 Bond Measure
include land acquisition and replacement/relocation/upgrade of portable classrooms.
Funding for a new elementary school and additional relocatable classrooms is as yet
unsecured.
The District intends to structure its capital improvement program so as to maintain a
constant level of construction throughout the program period, in order to optimally utilize
its management capacity.
Estimated expenditures for capacity improvement projects over the duration of the Plan are
indicated in the Table 4 below.
SIX‐YEAR FINANCE PLAN
Capacity Improvement Projects
PROJECT 2013‐14 2014‐15 2015‐16 2016‐17 2017‐18 2018‐19 Total
Secured2 Unsecured3
Early Childhood Center4 19,300 19,300 19,300
Middle School No. 4 2,189 4,461 13,971 23,663 1,716 46,000 46,000
Relocatable Classrooms 1,420 1,440 1,440 1,450 5,750 4,300 1,450
Land Acquisition 2,500 2,500 5,000 5,000
New Elementary School 1,625 3,250 9,750 16,250 30,875 30,875
Total 22,909 8,401 19,536 28,363 11,466 16,250 106,925 74,600 32,325
1. Estimated expenditures based on total project cost including hard and soft costs.
2. Secured funding includes 2008 and 2012 bond monies and previously collected school impact fees.
3. Unsecured funds include OSPI School Construction Assistance and future school impact fees.
4. Currently under construction. Scheduled for completion August 2013.
Funding ($1,000s)Estimated Expenditures1 ($1,000s)
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 88 of 181
Capital Facilities Plan 2013 - 2019 Renton School District No. 403
- 16 - 7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 89 of 181
Capital Facilities Plan 2013 - 2019 Renton School District No. 403
- 17 -
VII. IMPACT FEES
Each jurisdiction that imposes school impact fees requires that developers pay these fees to
help cover a share of the impact of new housing developments on school facilities.
To determine an equitable fee throughout unincorporated King County, a formula was
established. This formula can be found in King County code 21A and was substantially
adopted by the cities of Renton, Seattle, and Newcastle. The formula requires the District
to establish a “Student Generation Factor” that estimates how many students will be added
to a school district by each new single or multi-family unit constructed, and to establish
several standard construction costs which are unique to that district. Refer to Appendix G
for substantiating documentation on Student Generation Factors.
Site Acquisition Cost is the estimated cost per acre to purchase property.
Building Acquisition Cost is the estimated cost to construct facilities unique to the district.
New Facility Cost Models are provided in Appendix F.
Temporary Facility Cost is the estimated cost per classroom to purchase and install a
relocatable classroom.
State Funding Assistance Credit is the amount of funding provided by the State, subject to
District eligibility, based on a construction cost allocation and funding assistance
percentage established by the State.
In response to declining economic conditions over the past several years, and the slow
recovery, Renton School District has inserted a Voluntary District Adjustment component
into the prescribed impact fee formula. The intent of this adjustment is to limit any
increase in impact fees to a percentage equal to the local rate of inflation (CPU-U-Sea) as
reported by the King County Office of Economic and Financial Analysis. The increase in
the multi-family impact fee over last year’s fee was limited by the 2.38% rate of inflation
for 2012. As the single-family impact fee actually decreased, application of the fee
reduction was unnecessary.
Based on the Growth Management Act and King County Code 21A, impact fees for the
plan year 2013 are:
Single-Family Units $ 5,455
Multi-Family Units $ 1,339
Single-Family and Multi-Family Fee Calculation spreadsheets follow.
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 90 of 181
Capital Facilities Plan 2013 – 2019 Renton School District No. 403
- 18 -
((1 + i)t - 1
i (1 + i)t
SITE ACQUISITION COST
FACILITY SITE AREA COST PER ACRE STUDENTS STUDENT FACTOR COST
A1 Elementary 10 275,000 550 0.382 $1,910
A2 Middle 20 275,000 850 0.116 $751
A3 N / A 40 275,000 1250 0.139 $0
A Total 0.637 $2,661
BUILDING ACQUISITION COST
COST IN 2012 $ STUDENTS STUDENT FACTOR COST
B1 Elementary 96.64% 17,925,620 550 0.382 $12,032
B2 Middle 94.59% 30,444,140 850 0.116 $3,930
B3 N / A 99.39% 0 1250 0.139 $0
B Total 97.43 0.637 $15,962
TEMPORARY BUILDING ACQUISITION COST
COST PER CLASS STUDENTS STUDENT FACTOR COST
C1 Elementary 3.36% 120,000 24 0.382 $64
C2 Middle 5.41% 120,000 29 0.116 $26
C3 N / A 0.61% 120,000 29 0.139 $0
C Total 2.57 0.637 $90
STATE FUNDING ASSISTANCE CREDIT
COST INDEX SPI SQ FT MATCH % STUDENT FACTOR CREDIT
D1 188.55 90 0.4026 0.382 ($2,610)
D2 188.55 117 0.4026 0.116 ($1,030)
D3 188.55 130 0.4026 0.139 $0
D Total 0.637 ($3,640)
TAX CREDIT (TC) *
AVERAGE ASSESSED VALUE (AAV) 231,000
INTEREST RATE FOR BONDS (i) 3.64%
TERM (t = MAXIMUM 10) 10
TAX RATE (r) 0.00218222
TC Total ($4,162.91)($4,163)
FACILITY CREDIT $0
TOTAL FEE $10,910
50% DEVELOPER FEE OBLIGATION $5,455
VOLUNTARY DISTRICT ADJUSTMENT $0
ADJUSTED IMPACT FEE $5,455
SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE FEE CALCULATION
* TAX CREDIT (TC) = NPV (net present value) x AAV x r where: NPV =
AAV = Average Assessed Value
r = Tax Rate
i = Bond Interest Rate as of 12/27/12
t = Bond Term
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 91 of 181
Capital Facilities Plan 2013 – 2019 Renton School District No. 403
- 19 -
((1 + i)t - 1
i (1 + i)t
SITE ACQUISITION COST
FACILITY SITE AREA COST PER ACRE STUDENTS STUDENT FACTOR COST
A1 Elementary 10 275,000 550 0.132 $660
A2 Middle 20 275,000 850 0.038 $246
A3 High N/A 40 275,000 1250 0.054 $0
A Total 0.224 $906
BUILDING ACQUISITION COST
COST IN 2012 $ STUDENTS STUDENT FACTOR COST
B1 Elementary 96.64% 17,925,620 550 0.132 $4,158
B2 Middle 94.59% 30,444,140 850 0.038 $1,287
B3 High N/A 99.39% 0 1250 0.054 $0
B Total 97.43% 0.224 $5,445
TEMPORARY BUILDING ACQUISITION COST
COST PER CLASS STUDENTS STUDENT FACTOR COST
C1 Elementary 3.36% 120,000 24 0.132 $22
C2 Middle 5.41% 120,000 29 0.038 $9
C3 High N/A 0.61% 120,000 29 0.054 $0
C Total 2.57% 0.224 $31
STATE FUNDING ASSISTANCE CREDIT
COST INDEX SPI SQ FT MATCH % STUDENT FACTOR CREDIT
D1 188.55 90 0.4026 0.132 ($902)
D2 188.55 117 0.4026 0.038 ($337)
D3 188.55 130 0.4026 0.054 $0
D Total 0.224 ($1,239)
TAX CREDIT (TC) *
AVERAGE ASSESSED VALUE (AAS) 98,193
INTEREST RATE FOR BONDS (i) 3.64%
TERM (MAXIMUM 10) 10
TAX RATE (r) 0.00218222
TC Total ($1,769.56)($1,770)
FACILITY CREDIT $0
FEE $3,373
50% DEVELOPER FEE OBLIGATION $1,686
VOLUNTARY DISTRICT ADJUSTMENT ($347)
ADJUSTED IMPACT FEE $1,339
MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENCE FEE CALCULATION
* TAX CREDIT (TC) = NPV (net present value) x AAV x r where: NPV =
AAV = Average Assessed Value
r = Tax Rate
i = Bond Interest Rate as of 12/27/12
t = Bond Term
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 92 of 181
Capital Facilities Plan 2013 – 2019 Renton School District No. 403
- 20 -
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 93 of 181
Capital Facilities Plan 2013 – 2019 Renton School District No. 403
- 21 -
XIII. APPENDICES
APPENDIX A: DISTRICT MAPS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
APPENDIX B: CAPACITY WORKSHEETS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
APPENDIX C: HEADCOUNT & PROJECTIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .27
APPENDIX D: 2008 BOND SUMMARY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .29
APPENDIX E: 2012 BOND SUMMARY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .31
APPENDIX F: STUDENT GENERATION FACTORS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .33
APPENDIX G: SCHOOL COST MODELS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 94 of 181
Capital Facilities Plan 2013 – 2019 Renton School District No. 403
- 22 -
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 95 of 181
Six-Year Capital FacilitiesPlan 2013 – 2019 Renton School District No. 403
APPENDIX A
- 23 -
SERVICE AREA MAP
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 96 of 181
Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan 2013 – 2019 Renton School District No. 403
APPENDIX A
- 24 -
7b
.
-
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
a
n
d
E
c
o
n
o
m
i
c
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
D
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
r
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
s
Pa
g
e
9
7
o
f
1
8
1
Capital Facilities Plan 2013 – 2019 Renton School District No. 403
APPENDIX B
- 25 -
ASSUMPTIONS Average class size: 25.66 Class size: K 24
FTE variation from 10 / 1 0.98 1 24
Scheduling efficiency: 0.94 2 24
3 24
4 29
5 29
1/2-DAY AVE ANN AVE ANN
CLASSROOMS TOTAL KINDER
1 SPEC ED SPEC USE STUDENT PORT USE ADD SPEC CAP with
CAP PORTABLES
SCHOOL
BENSON HILL 29 3 4 2 615 00615
BRYN MAWR 21 2 1 2 483 20530
CAMPBELL HILL 22 0 3 2 402 00402
CASCADE 26 2 1 3 577 30648
HAZELWOOD 28 3 2 3 615 00615
HIGHLANDS 28 3 2 3 635 00635
HONEY DEW 19 3 1 1 473 40567
KENNYDALE 30 3 4 2 658 00658
LAKERIDGE 23 0 3 2 425 50544
MAPLEWOOD HEIGHTS 26 2 3 2 544 60686
RENTON PARK 28 1 3 2 587 00587
SIERRA HEIGHTS 26 2 2 2 587 80776
TALBOT HILL 23 2 1 2 540 30611
TIFFANY PARK 23 2 4 2 469 00469
TOTAL 352 28 34 30 7610 3108342
capacity of the room. Currently 6 of 34 Kindergarten rooms are used for full-day Kindergarten.
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CAPACITY
1 Kindergarten classrooms currently used for half-day kindergarten are counted as two rooms to reflect the
ASSUMPTIONS Average class size 29 Class size 6 29
FTE variation from 10 / 1 0.98 7 29
Scheduling efficiency 0.99 8 29
#AVE ANN AVE ANN
TEACHING SPEC SPEC FTE PORT SPEC FTE CAP
CLASSROOMS STATIONS GENERIC SCI PE DRAMA COMP CTE ART MUSIC ED USE CAP USE USE W/ PORT
SCHOOL
DIMMITT 43 262411412201154 7 1351
McKNIGHT 47 20 8 4 1 2 2 1 3 6 0 1154 8 1379
NELSEN 47 18 8 3 1 3 2 1 2 9 0 1069 8 1294
TOTAL 137 17 0 3376 23 4023
MIDDLE SCHOOL CAPACITY
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 98 of 181
Capital Facilities Plan 2013 – 2019 Renton School District No. 403
APPENDIX B
- 26 -
ASSUMPTIONS Average class size 29 Class size 9 29
FTE variation from 10 / 1 0.98 10 29
Scheduling efficiency 0.85 11 29
12 29
#AVE ANN AVE ANN
TEACHING SPEC SPEC FTE PORT SPEC FTE CAP
CLASSROOMS STATIONS GENERIC SCI GYM HE COMP SHOP ART MUSIC ED USE CAP USE USE W/ PORT
SCHOOL
HAZEN 77 48 6 5 3 6 4 3 2 9 0 1643 0 1643
LINDBERGH 59 34 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 5 0 1304 1 1329
RENTON 78 44 6 5 6 7 5 3 2 5 0 1763 0 1763
TOTAL 214 19 0 4711 1 4735
1. Under construction. Scheduled for completion August 2012
HIGH SCHOOL CAPACITY
ASSUMPTIONS Average class size 11 All facilities used for special programs
FTE variation from 10 / 1 0.98
Scheduling efficiency 0.94
AVE ANN AVE ANN
CLASSROOMS GENERIC SPEC ED SPEC USE FTE PORT USE ADD SPEC FTE CAP
CAP W/ PORT
SCHOOL
HAZELWOOD (old) 24 0 0 243 40284
HILLCREST 14 0 0 142 60203
SARTORI 14 0 0 142 00142
SLC 25 0 0 253 00253
SPRING GLEN 14 0 0 142 40182
TOTAL 91 0 0 922 14 0 1064
SPECIAL EDUCATIONAL FACILITY CAPACITY
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 99 of 181
Capital Facilities Plan 2013 - 2019 Renton School District No. 403
APPENDIX C
- 27 -
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 100 of 181
Capital Facilities Plan 2013 – 2019 Renton School District No. 403
APPENDIX C
- 28 -
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 101 of 181
Capital Facilities Plan 2013 - 2019 Renton School District No. 403
APPENDIX D
- 29 -
2008 BOND MEASURE SUMMARY
NEW FACILITIES
Secondary Alternative Campus
68,000 sf
Located at Black River Campus
Early Childhood Center
60,000 sf
Located at Hillcrest site
EXISTING FACILITIES UPGRADES
Lindbergh High School
Upgrade track and field
Replace roof (200,000 sf)
Upgrade kitchen
Parking and site access upgrades
Gymnasium upgrades
Replace auditorium sound system, and stage curtain
Replace auditorium accordion wall and stage floor
Upgrade windows
Acoustical upgrades at corridors
New reader board and scoreboards
Hazen High School
Upgrade track and field
Construct 27,900 sf addition
Parking and site access upgrades
Gymnasium upgrades
Upgrade kitchen
Renton High School
New score boards
Upgrade PE station below south gymnasium
Upgrade door hardware
Nelsen Middle School
Upgrade kitchen
Upgrade select windows
Refinish and upgrade doors
Upgrade cabinets
Complete restroom modernizations
Select floor finish replacement
Paint gymnasium and add acoustical treatment
Modernize art room and library
Convert portion of locker rooms to storage
Upgrade track, field and irrigation
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 102 of 181
Capital Facilities Plan 2013 – 2019 Renton School District No. 403
APPENDIX D
- 30 -
Dimmitt Middle School
Upgrade kitchen
Remodel reception and student lounge
Parking and site access upgrades
Refinish and upgrades doors
Upgrade cabinets
Complete restroom modernizations
Add doors to storage rooms off corridor at area B
Select floor finish replacement
Paint gymnasium and add acoustical treatment
Convert portion of locker rooms to storage
Upgrade track, field and irrigation
Honey Dew Elementary School
Upgrade fields
Renton Stadium
Upgrade track and field
Provide new press box
Remodel restrooms and concession stands
Upgrade lighting
Earthquake Safety Improvements
Resurface and restripe parking lot
Paint
Replace boilers
Replace scoreboards
DISTRICT WIDE UPGRADES
Safety & Security Upgrades
Fire alarm systems
Sidewalks and resurfacing
Accessibility
Access controls
Security upgrades
Fencing
Emergency communications systems
Energy Conservation
Replace heat pumps and compressors
Upgrades boilers and burners
Upgrade fluorescent tubes and ballasts
Covered Play Areas (5000 sf ea)
Cascade Elementary School
Maplewood Heights Elementary School
Portable Classrooms
Replacement and growth
Building Finishes Upgrades
Replace identified flooring and cabinetry
Replace identified window blinds
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 103 of 181
Capital Facilities Plan 2013 - 2019 Renton School District No. 403
APPENDIX E
- 31 -
2012 BOND MEASURE SUMMARY
NEW FACILITIES
New Middle School
75,000 sf
Located at Renton Academy site
EXISTING FACILITIES UPGRADES
Lindbergh Pool Upgrades
SITE RELATED UPGRADES
Parking Lot and Sidewalk Upgrades
Elementary Field Upgrades
SAFETY AND SECURITY
Add Emergency Generators
Fire Alarm and Smoke Detector Upgrades
Security System Upgrades
ENERGY CONSERVATION
Boiler Upgrades
Parking Lot Lighting and Controls
Heating Systems Upgrades
BUILDING UPGRADES
Exterior Upgrades
Roofing Replacements
Replace Gutters and Downspouts
Interior Upgrades
Upgrade/Replace Interior Finishes and Materials
Electrical – Replace/Upgrade System Components
Plumbing – Replace/Upgrade System Components
Mechanical – Replace/Upgrade System Components
Portables
Replace Aging Portables
LAND ACQUISITION
For Future Planning
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 104 of 181
Capital Facilities Plan 2013 – 2019 Renton School District No. 403
APPENDIX E
- 32 -
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 105 of 181
Capital Facilities Plan 2013 - 2019 Renton School District No. 403
APPENDIX F
- 33 -
STUDENT GENERATION FACTORS
The formula for determining school impact fees, as established by King County Council
Ordinance 11621, Attachment A, requires that school districts provide “student factors
based on district records of average actual student generation rates for new developments
constructed over a period of not more than five years prior to the date of the fee
calculation.” The Ordinance also provides that, in the event this information is not
available in the District, “data from adjacent districts, districts with similar demographics,
or county-wide averages must be used.”
King County currently assesses and collects impact fees on behalf of twelve school
districts, including Renton School District. Of those twelve districts, only five conduct
their own surveys to develop their unique student generation factors based on district
records and actual development data. The remaining six districts, including Renton, rely
on averages of student factors developed by other districts.
In accordance with King County Ordinance 11621, Attachment A, the District has chosen
to use a county-wide average based on all districts that have performed their own student
generation factor surveys. The Student Generation Factors in Table 6 below represent an
average of the actual rates calculated by Auburn, Federal Way, Fife, Issaquah, Kent and
Lake Washington School Districts.
Figure 7 on the following page details the student generation factors developed by the
Districts referenced above, and the averages used in this Plan’s impact fee calculations.
STUDENT GENERATION FACTORS
ELEMENTARY
(K‐5)
MIDDLE
(6‐8)
HIGH
(9‐12) TOTAL
SINGLE‐
FAMILY 0.382 0.116 0.139 0.637
MULTI‐
FAMILY 0.132 0.038 0.054 0.224
Table 6
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 106 of 181
Capital Facilities Plan 2013 - 2019 Renton School District No. 403
APPENDIX F
- 34 -
COUNTY-WIDE STUDENT GENERATION FACTORS
DISTRICT K‐56‐89‐12 TOTAL K‐56‐89‐12 TOTAL
Auburn 0.261 0.130 0.134 0.525 0.172 0.070 0.090 0.332
Federal Way 0.332 0.166 0.210 0.707 0.148 0.042 0.059 0.249
Fife 0.256 0.103 0.026 0.385 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Issaquah 0.502 0.159 0.136 0.797 0.092 0.033 0.032 0.157
Lake Washington 0.454 0.108 0.077 0.639 0.051 0.018 0.017 0.086
Kent 0.486 0.031 0.25 0.767 0.331 0.067 0.124 0.522
TOTAL 2.291 0.697 0.833 3.820 0.794 0.230 0.322 1.346
AVERAGE 0.382 0.116 0.139 0.637 0.132 0.038 0.054 0.224
SINGLE‐FAMILY MULTI ‐FAMILY
Figure 7
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 107 of 181
Capital Facilities Plan 2013 - 2019 Renton School District No. 403
APPENDIX G
- 35 -
FACILITY COST MODELS
Facility cost models are a calculation of the cost to construct educational facilities unique
to the District. This is accomplished by utilizing both District specific data as well as
information available from OSPI.
OSPI constants are factors established by OSPI as part of its School Construction
Assistance Program. State Funding Assistance Percentages are unique to individual school
districts while the Construction Cost Allocation (per square foot of construction) is
constant throughout the state. The State Area Allocation (per student) is used solely by
OSPI to determine a District’s eligibility for state funding. It is not meant to represent or
reflect the unique spatial needs of a District necessary to provide its adopted programs and
standard of service.
The District Area Allocation utilized in the cost models reflects historical data from
previously constructed facilities, adjusted to reflect current programs, anticipated funding
and other topical issues. The applied Cost per Square Foot is an average of recently bid
school projects of similar grade levels in the Puget Sound Region, as reported by OSPI.
Elementary and Middle School Cost Models follow.
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 108 of 181
Capital Facilities Plan 2013 - 2019 Renton School District No. 403
APPENDIX G
- 36 -
New-in-Lieu Area 0 0
New Area 60,500 0
Capacity 550 State Funding Assistance Percentage 40.26%
2012 COST PER SF 238.44 188.55
District Area Allocation 110 State Area Allocation (sf) per Student 90
TOTAL NEW STATE LOCAL
NEW-IN-LIEU MAXIMUM COST
CONSTRUCTION COST 17,925,620 0 17,925,620
BUILDING MODERNIZATION 0
NEW 14,425,620
SITE 2,500,000
OFF-SITE 1,000,000
Site acquisition costs are not included
PROFESSIONAL FEES 11
SALES TAX 9
CO CONTINGENCY 6
PERMITS 1
SPECIAL INSP. 1
ART
NIC WORK 1
TEMPORARY FACILITIES 1
MOVING/STORAGE 1
FURNISHINGS 9
5
MITIGATION FEES 4
PROJECT CONT. 12
TOTAL 61
SUBTOTAL 10,934,628 10,934,628
28,860,248 28,860,248
INFLATION
BID DATE JULY 2013 2.16% 29,483,630 29,483,630
2014 2.48% 30,214,824 30,214,824
2015 2.44% 30,952,065 30,952,065
2016 2.54% 31,738,248 31,738,248
2017 2.57% 32,553,921 32,553,921
2018 2.67% 33,423,110 33,423,110
2019 2.72% 34,332,219 34,332,219
MANAGEMENT / ADMINISTRATION
NEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL COST MODEL
NEW CONSTRUCTION
FACILITY INFORMATION
State Funding Area Modernization
Unhoused Students (Addition)
State Construction Cost Allocation (7/1/12)
OSPI CONSTANTS
2.5
3
0
1
7
0TOTAL COST IN 2012 DOLLARS
NON-CONSTRUCTION PROJECT COSTS
COST CATEGORIES
0
6
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 109 of 181
Capital Facilities Plan 2013 - 2019 Renton School District No. 403
APPENDIX G
- 37 -
New-in-Lieu Area 0 State Funding Area Modernization 0
New Area 102,000 Unhoused Students (Addition) 0
Capacity 850 State Funding Assistance Percentage 40.26%
2012 COST PER SF 266.57 State Construction Cost Allocation (7/1/12) 188.55
Area Allocation Goal 120 State Area Allocation (sf) per Student 117
TOTAL NEW STATE LOCAL
NEW-IN-LIEU MAXIMUM COST
CONSTRUCTION COST 30,440,140 0 30,440,140
BUILDING MODERNIZATION 0
NEW 27,190,140
SITE 2,250,000
OFF-SITE 1,000,000
Site acquisition costs are not included
NON-CONSTRUCTION PROJECT COSTS
PROFESSIONAL FEES 11 6
SALES TAX 9 7
CO CONTINGENCY 6
PERMITS 1
SPECIAL INSP. 1 1
ART
NIC WORK 1
TEMPORARY FACILITIES 1
MOVING/STORAGE 1
FURNISHINGS 9 3
52.5
MITIGATION FEES 4
PROJECT CONT. 12
TOTAL 61 19.5
SUBTOTAL 18,568,485 0 18,568,485
TOTAL COST IN 2012 DOLLARS 49,008,625 0 49,008,625
INFLATION
BID DATE JULY 2013 2.16% 50,067,212 50,067,212
2014 2.48% 51,308,879 51,308,879
2015 2.44% 52,560,815 52,560,815
2016 2.54% 53,895,860 53,895,860
2017 2.57% 55,280,984 55,280,984
2018 2.67% 56,756,986 56,756,986
2019 2.72% 58,300,776 58,300,776
MANAGEMENT / ADMINISTRATION
NEW MIDDLE SCHOOL COST MODEL
FACILITY INFORMATION OSPI CONSTANTS
COST CATEGORIES NEW CONSTRUCTION
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 110 of 181
*
*
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 111 of 181
1
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO. _______
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AMENDING
CHAPTER 1, ADMINISTRATION AND ENFORCEMENT, OF TITLE IV
(DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS) OF ORDINANCE NO. _______ ENTITLED
“CODE OF GENERAL ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF RENTON,
WASHINGTON” SETTING THE IMPACT FEE AT $5,730 PER NEW SINGLE-
FAMILY HOME AND $1,097 PER NEW MULTI-FAMILY IN THE ISSAQUAH
SCHOOL DISTRICT; RETAIN THE IMPACT FEE AT $5,486 PER NEW SINGLE
FAMILY HOME AND $3,378 PER NEW MULTI-FAMILY HOME IN THE
KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT; SET THE IMPACT FEE AT $5,455 PER NEW
SINGLE FAMILY HOME AND $1,339 PER NEW MULTI-FAMILY HOME IN
THE RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT; AND ADOPTING THE CAPITAL
FACILITIES PLANS OF THE ISSAQUAH AND KENT SCHOOL DISTRICTS.
WHEREAS, under Section 4.1.160 of Chapter 1, Administration and
Enforcement, of Title IV (Development Regulations), of Ordinance No. 4260 known as
the “Revised and Compiled Ordinances of the City of Renton,” as amended, and the
maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the City of Renton has heretofore
collected on behalf of the Issaquah School District an impact fee of $3,738, for each
new single-family home built within the District’s boundaries and no fee for new multi-
family units; and
WHEREAS, the Issaquah School District requested that the City of Renton adopt
the District’s 2013 Capital Facilities Plan, which includes a increase in the impact fee for
new single-family homes to $5,730 and a new impact fee for new multi-family units at
$1,097; and
WHEREAS, under Section 4.1.160 of Chapter 1, Administration and
Enforcement, of Title IV (Development Regulations), of Ordinance No. 4260 known as
the “Revised and Compiled Ordinances of the City of Renton,” as amended, and the
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 112 of 181
2
maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the City of Renton has heretofore
collected on behalf of the Kent School District an impact fee of $5,486 for each new
single-family home and $3,378 per new multi-family unit built within the District’s
boundaries; and
WHEREAS, the Kent School District requested that the City of Renton adopt the
District’s 2013/2014 – 2018/2019 Capital Facilities Plan, which recommends the
continued collection of an impact fee for new single-family homes at $5,486 and an for
new multi-family units, $3,378; and
WHEREAS, under Section 4.1.160 of Chapter 1, Administration and
Enforcement, of Title IV (Development Regulations), of Ordinance No. 4260 known as
the “Revised and Compiled Ordinances of the City of Renton,” as amended, and the
maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the City of Renton has heretofore
collected on behalf of the Renton School District an impact fee of $6,395 for each new
single-family home and $1,308 per new multi-family unit built within the District’s
boundaries; and
WHEREAS, the Issaquah School District requested that the City of Renton adopt
the District’s 2013-2019 Capital Facilities Plan, which includes an decrease in the impact
fee for new single-family homes to $5,455 and increase in the impact fee for multi-
family units to $1,339.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON,
DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 113 of 181
3
SECTION I. Note 5 of subsection 4-1-160D. Fee Calculations, of Chapter 1,
Administration and Enforcement, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance
No. 4260 entitled “Revised and Compiled Ordinances of the City of Renton,
Washington” is hereby amended as follows:
5.The City Council may adjust the fee calculated under this
subsection, as it sees fit, to take into account local conditions
such as, but not limited to, price differentials throughout the
District in the cost of new housing, school occupancy levels,
and the percent of the District’s Capital Facilities Budget,
which will be expended locally. The City council establishes
the following fees:
Single-Family
Fee Amount
Multi-Family
Fee Amount
Issaquah
School
District
$5,730.00 $1,097.00
Kent School
District
$5,486.00 $3,378.00
Renton
School
District
$5,455.00 $1,339.00
SECTION II. Subsection 4-1-160J, Adoption of the District Capital Facilities Plan
and Submission of the Annual Updates and Report and Data, of Chapter 1,
Administration and Enforcement of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance
No. 4260 entitled “Revised and Compiled Ordinances of the City of Renton,
Washington” is hereby amended as follows:
1.The following capital facilities plans are hereby
adopted by reference by the City as part of the Capital
Facilities Element of the City’s Comprehensive Plan:
a.The Issaquah School District No. 411 2013
Capital Facilities Plan;
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 114 of 181
4
b.The Kent School District No. 415 2013/2014 –
2018/2019 Capital Facilities Plan;
c.The Renton School District No. 403 2013-2019
Capital Facilities Plan.
SECTION III. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval and
thirty days after its publication.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this _____ day of ______________, _____.
Bonnie Walton, City Clerk
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this _____ day of ______________, _____.
Denis Law, Mayor
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Date of Publication: ________________
ORD.
7b. - Community and Economic
Development Department recommends Page 115 of 181
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Subject/Title:
Washington State Department of Commerce
Direct Appropriations Agreement-Renton
Riverview Bridge Replacement
Meeting:
Regular Council - 25 Nov 2013
Exhibits:
Issue Paper
Site Map
Contract Agreement
Resolution
Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board:
Community Services
Staff Contact:
Leslie Betlach, X-6619
Recommended Action:
Refer to Finance Committee
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required: $ 1,167,000.00 Transfer Amendment: $
Amount Budgeted: $ 100,000.00 Revenue Generated: $1,067,000.00
Total Project Budget: $ 1,167,000.00 City Share Total Project: $ 100,000.00
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
The Riverview Park bridge is over fifty years old and serves as an access point to the Cedar River Trail,
Riverview Park and over 250 acres of natural area. The bridge has been remodeled and structurally
repaired multiple times and in 2012, the bridge was rated in "poor condition and at the end of its useful
life" (PND Engineers, Inc.). The City sought outside funding sources to help fund the bridge replacement
and in 2013 successfully secured $1.1 million in state Capital Budget monies as a direct appropriation
from the legislature. The State Department of Commerce will administer the funds. Grant
administration fees will reduce the funding by $33,000, bringing the available funding to $1,067,000. A
$100,000 City match is required, increasing the total project budget to $1,167,000. Funding will be
utilized to remove and replace the existing bridge and in stream piles, complete habitat planting and
replace three interpretive signs with new signage. This Agreement is for the $1,067,000 and the required
$100,000 City match (total $1,167,000). The match is budgeted in 316.332041.020.594.76.63.000-
Riverview Park Bridge Replacement. The Contract End Date of June 30, 2016, acknowledges the design
complexity, required permits, and "fish window" construction timeframe which is typically 4-8 weeks and
generally commences July 1 and expires August 31 of each year. The City estimates a three month
construction period (4-8 weeks in water) and due to the in-water work, approval and permitting process,
construction will be pushed into the 2015 "fish window". The June 30, 2016, Contract End Date requires
the legislature to re-appropriate the unexpended funds as the Biennium Close Date is June 30,
2015. The process to begin the re-appropriation starts with the Department of Commerce in late 2014
and goes to the legislature for consideration in 2015. The Department of Commerce indicated that as
this project will be well into the design and permitting phase when the request is being made, there is a
high likelihood the funds will be re-appropriated. The Department of Commerce also indicated they have
supported requests for re-appropriation with previous projects.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Authorize the Mayor and the City Clerk to execute the Agreement, adopt the Resolution and adjust the
budget to reflect receipt of grant funding.
7c. - Community Services Department
recommends approval of an interlocal Page 116 of 181
h:\parks\parks planning & natural resources director\parks\riverview\doc replacement\contract\legislative\riverview
bridge issue paper.doc
COMMUNITY SERVICES
DEPARTMENT
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: November 18, 2013
TO: Randy Corman, Council President
Members of Renton City Council
VIA:
FROM:
Denis Law, Mayor
Terry Higashiyama, Community Services Administrator
STAFF CONTACT: Leslie Betlach, Parks Planning and Natural Resources Director
(x-6619)
SUBJECT: Washington State Department of Commerce Direct
Appropriation Agreement – Renton Riverview Bridge
Replacement
ISSUE:
Should the City Council authorize the acceptance of grant funding by adopting a Resolution
authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute an Agreement with the State Department of
Commerce to include the allocation of $1,067,000 in grant funds and commit the City to a
$100,000 grant match for the removal and replacement of the Riverview Park Bridge and
habitat planting?
RECOMMENDATION:
City Council authorize the acceptance of grant funding by adopting a Resolution
authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute an Agreement with the Department of
Commerce to accept $1,067,000 in grant funds and commit a $100,000 grant match for
the Riverview Park Bridge Replacement project.
Adjust the budget to reflect the receipt of grant funding.
BACKGROUND SUMMARY:
The Riverview Park bridge is over fifty years old and serves as an access point to the Cedar
River Trail, Riverview Park (and seven other Renton parks and the Maplewood Golf Course)
and over 250 acres of natural area. The bridge was in place when the City acquired the
(now) Riverview Park property in the late seventies. Structural repairs were completed in
1980 and the bridge was remodeled in 1994 with the Riverview Park construction. Structural
repairs were again completed in 2005 and again in 2010 and 2011 after major flood events.
Finally in 2012, the bridge was rated in "poor condition and at the end of its useful life" by
PND Engineers, Inc. The City sought state and federal grant funding to help fund the bridge
replacement in 2012; the project ranked below the anticipated funding levels.
7c. - Community Services Department
recommends approval of an interlocal Page 117 of 181
Randy Corman, Council President
Members of Renton City Council
Page 2 of 2
November 18, 2013
h:\parks\parks planning & natural resources director\parks\riverview\doc replacement\contract\legislative\riverview bridge issue
paper.doc
In 2013 the City successfully secured $1.1 million in state Capital Budget monies as a direct
appropriation from the legislature. The State Department of Commerce will administer the
funds. Grant administration fees will reduce the funding b y $33,000, bringing the available
funding to $1,067,000. A $100,000 City match is required, increasing the total project budget
to $1,167,000. Funding will be utilized to remove and replace the existing bridge and in
stream piles, complete habitat planting and replace three interpretive signs with new
signage. This Agreement is for the $1,067,000 and the required $100,000 City match (total
$1,167,000). The match is budgeted in 316.332041.020.594.76.63.000-Riverview Park Bridge
Replacement.
To date the City has successfully completed the requirements for Governor's Executive
Order 05-05, Historical and Cultural Review, which is required to be completed in advance of
contract execution. Any archaeological resources uncovered during the construction phase
will require further consultation.
The Contract End Date of June 30, 2016, acknowledges the design complexity, required
permits, and "fish window" construction timeframe which is typically 4-8 weeks and
generally commences July 1 and expires August 31 of each year. The City estimates a three
month construction period (4-8 weeks in water) and due to the in-water work, approval and
permitting process, construction will be pushed into the 2015 "fish window". The June 30,
2016, Contract End Date requires the legislature to re-appropriate the unexpended funds as
the Biennium Close Date is June 30, 2015. The process to begin the re-appropriation starts
with the Department of Commerce in late 2014. The project will be well into the design and
permitting phase at this time.
Section 1.22 – Re-appropriation, of this Agreement, specifies that Commerce will make all
necessary efforts to seek re-appropriation of funds into the declared Biennium. In addition,
Section 1.21 - Reduction in Funds, of this Agreement, specifies that in the event state funds
appropriated for the work contemplated under the Contract are withdrawn, reduced, or
limited in any way by the Washington State Governor or Legislature during the Contract
period, the parties hereto shall be bound by any su ch revised funding limitations as
implemented at the discretion of Commerce, and shall meet and renegotiate the Contract
accordingly. In conversations with the Department of Commerce, every effort will be made
to support the re-appropriation of funds. Commerce has indicated that as the project is well
into the design and permitting phase there is a high likelihood the funds will be re -
appropriated.
CONCLUSION:
Acceptance of grant funding and committing a grant match provides the City the opportunity
to remove the existing Riverview Park bridge and replace it with a new bridge utilizing
environmentally sensitive materials and design features, complete shoreline habitat planting
and replace and update the three interpretive signs.
7c. - Community Services Department
recommends approval of an interlocal Page 118 of 181
UV169
UV169
UV169
CCeeddaarrRRiivveerr
0 130 26065
Feet±
")
")
")
#*
Cedar R iver Trail
Interpretive SignProject Component")
Hand Carr yBoad Launch
Parking
PedestrianBridge
PicnicShelter
Restroom s
NaturalArea
Riverview Pa rk Pe destrian Bridge and Habitat Project
TrestleBridge
General Pr oject Lim its
7c
.
- C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
D
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
re
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
s
a
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
o
f
a
n
i
n
t
e
r
l
o
c
a
l
Pa
g
e
1
1
9
o
f
1
8
1
7c. - Community Services Department
recommends approval of an interlocal Page 120 of 181
7c. - Community Services Department
recommends approval of an interlocal Page 121 of 181
7c. - Community Services Department
recommends approval of an interlocal Page 122 of 181
7c. - Community Services Department
recommends approval of an interlocal Page 123 of 181
7c. - Community Services Department
recommends approval of an interlocal Page 124 of 181
7c. - Community Services Department
recommends approval of an interlocal Page 125 of 181
7c. - Community Services Department
recommends approval of an interlocal Page 126 of 181
7c. - Community Services Department
recommends approval of an interlocal Page 127 of 181
7c. - Community Services Department
recommends approval of an interlocal Page 128 of 181
7c. - Community Services Department
recommends approval of an interlocal Page 129 of 181
7c. - Community Services Department
recommends approval of an interlocal Page 130 of 181
7c. - Community Services Department
recommends approval of an interlocal Page 131 of 181
7c. - Community Services Department
recommends approval of an interlocal Page 132 of 181
7c. - Community Services Department
recommends approval of an interlocal Page 133 of 181
7c. - Community Services Department
recommends approval of an interlocal Page 134 of 181
7c. - Community Services Department
recommends approval of an interlocal Page 135 of 181
7c. - Community Services Department
recommends approval of an interlocal Page 136 of 181
7c. - Community Services Department
recommends approval of an interlocal Page 137 of 181
7c. - Community Services Department
recommends approval of an interlocal Page 138 of 181
7c. - Community Services Department
recommends approval of an interlocal Page 139 of 181
7c. - Community Services Department
recommends approval of an interlocal Page 140 of 181
7c. - Community Services Department
recommends approval of an interlocal Page 141 of 181
7c. - Community Services Department
recommends approval of an interlocal Page 142 of 181
7c. - Community Services Department
recommends approval of an interlocal Page 143 of 181
7c. - Community Services Department
recommends approval of an interlocal Page 144 of 181
7c. - Community Services Department
recommends approval of an interlocal Page 145 of 181
7c. - Community Services Department
recommends approval of an interlocal Page 146 of 181
7c. - Community Services Department
recommends approval of an interlocal Page 147 of 181
7c. - Community Services Department
recommends approval of an interlocal Page 148 of 181
7c. - Community Services Department
recommends approval of an interlocal Page 149 of 181
7c. - Community Services Department
recommends approval of an interlocal Page 150 of 181
7c. - Community Services Department
recommends approval of an interlocal Page 151 of 181
7c. - Community Services Department
recommends approval of an interlocal Page 152 of 181
7c. - Community Services Department
recommends approval of an interlocal Page 153 of 181
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Subject/Title:
Addendum No. 2 to Public Defense Services
Agreement (CAG -11-031)
Meeting:
Regular Council - 25 Nov 2013
Exhibits:
Addendum No. 2 Public Defense Services (CAG-11-
031)
Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board:
Executive
Staff Contact:
Jay Covington, CAO, x6500
Recommended Action:
Refer to Finance Committee
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required: $ 410,000 Transfer Amendment: $
Amount Budgeted: $ 450,000 Revenue Generated: $
Total Project Budget: $ City Share Total Project: $
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
In February of this year, the City Council approved a one-year extension of the existing contract with
Cayce & Grove to continue to provide indigent public defense representational services for qualifying
defendants in Renton's Municipal Court system. At that time, staff anticipated that the June 2012
Washington State Supreme Court caseload reduction requirements would take effect as scheduled in
September 2013, and a new 2014 public defense contract would need to be negotiated to reflect the
new requirements. To comply with the pending requirements, the City Council adopted case weighting
policies and procedures which took effect in June of this year. This allowed us to develop some
experiential data, which would help us in drafting a new public defense contract. Subsequent to the
City's action, the State Supreme Court delayed the implementation date to January 1, 2015, and ordered
the Washington State Office of Public Defense to develop a model misdemeanor case-weighting policy.
This new direction creates some uncertainty as to whether our recently adopted weighting policies and
procedures will remain in compliance past 2014.
Because of this uncertainty, staff recommends a second extension to the Cayce & Grove agreement
through June of 2015. This will give us time to react to any new requirements, incorporate those into an
RFP if necessary, and develop a new contract for indigent public defense services to take effect on and
after July 1, 2015. The recommended assessment modifies section 3 of the original agreement:
"Method of Compensation" to a flat monthly rate, based on an estimated annual caseload of 1,800
cases, rather than a per-case basis for appointed, "courtesy", DUI "in-custody", and other cases. Based
on 2013 projections, staff anticipates the revised agreement could save the City up to $60,000 over the
18 month contract period.
Staff will continue to collect weighted caseload data, to compare with whatever revised requirements
the State may impose by January 2015.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approve Addendum No. 2 to the Public Defense Services Agreement (CAG-11-031), extending the
contract for 18 months, through June 30, 2015, and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the
Addendum.
7d. - Executive Department recommends
approval of Addendum No. 2 to CAG-11-Page 154 of 181
7d. - Executive Department recommends
approval of Addendum No. 2 to CAG-11-Page 155 of 181
ADDENDUM NO.2
for
Public Defense Services (CAG -11-031)
This Addendum is made and entered into this , day of December, by and between the City of
Renton, a Washington municipal corporation hereinafter referred to as the “City”, and Cayce &
Grove, LLC, a Washington limited liability corporation located at 405 South Fourth Street, Renton WA,
98057, hereinafter referred to as the “Consultant”.
WHEREAS, the City engaged the services of the consultant under Agreement for Services CAG-11-031,
dated March 8, 2011, hereinafter referred to as the “Agreement”, and extended by Addendum No 1.
on March 12, 2013, to provide indigent public defense representational services; and
WHEREAS, Section 12 of the Agreement provides for extension of the agreement to be in two-year
increments;
WHEREAS, the Washington State Supreme Court has issued certain caseload guidance for public
defense services to take effect January 1, 2015;
WHEREAS, the City is developing necessary policies to implement such caseload measures by the
effective date;
WHEREAS, upon the adoption of such policies, it may be necessary for the City and the Consultant to
redefine the units and/or revise the service charge per unit as described in Section 3 of the
Agreement;
WHEREAS, to allow time for the development of the City’s caseload policies, the City and the
Consultant desire to extend the Agreement for 18 months;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is mutually agreed that the Agreement is amended as follows:
1. Term.
Section 1 of the Agreement is extended by 18 months to a total of 4.5 years.
2.Method of Compensation.
Section 3 of the Agreement is amended such that the Consultant will be compensated for services
at $34,166 per month up to 1,800 cases per year. The Consultant will be compensated at $230
per case for each case over 1,800. Courtesy calendar visits and reappointments will cease to be
billed to the city beginning January 2014.
3.Performance Period.
7d. - Executive Department recommends
approval of Addendum No. 2 to CAG-11-Page 156 of 181
Section 12 of the Agreement is amended such that the Agreement shall be in full force and effect
for the calendar year 2014 and the first 6 months of 2015 in addition to 2011, 2012, and 2013.
3.Full Force and Effect until July 1, 2015.
All other terms and conditions of the Agreement not modified by this Amendment shall remain in
full force and effect.
CITY OF RENTON CAYCE & GROVE LLC
__________________________________________________________________
Denis Law Date Tricia R. Grove Date
Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________________
Bonnie L. WaltonCity Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
________________________________
Lawrence J. WarrenCity Attorney
7d. - Executive Department recommends
approval of Addendum No. 2 to CAG-11-Page 157 of 181
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Subject/Title:
2014 State Legislative Priorities at a Glance
Meeting:
Regular Council - 25 Nov 2013
Exhibits:
2014 Legislative Priorities at a Glance
Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board:
Executive
Staff Contact:
Preeti Shridhar, x6569
Recommended Action:
Refer to Committee of the Whole
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required: $ N/A Transfer Amendment: $N/A
Amount Budgeted: $ N/A Revenue Generated: $N/A
Total Project Budget: $ N/A City Share Total Project: $ N/A
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
Prior to each state legislative session, the City Council considers documents that summarizes the City's
position on current state issues. The 2014 State Legislative Priorities at a Glance serves as a guidance
for City staff as it works with the Legislature to achieve the City's goals.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt the 2014 State Legislative Priorities at a Glance as proposed.
7e. - Executive Department recommends
approval of the 2014 State Legislative Page 158 of 181
City of Renton
2014 State Legislative Priorities at a Glance
Transportation
The Interstate 405/State Route (SR) 167 interchange and the I-405 segment between Renton
and Bellevue rank as the state’s most congested interchange and freeway segment. The City
requests that the core missions of “fixing the worst first,” finishing projects already started and
investing in corridor improvements that reduce travel times and delays play a key role in
guiding legislative priorities and investment decisions.
Capacity upgrades to the I-405/SR 167 connector and additional lanes between Bellevue and
Renton are critical investments for the economy of Renton and the entire Central Puget Sound
region.
Renton urges the Legislature to enact a comprehensive transportation investment package
including the aforementioned 405 and 405/167 investments, as well as funding and options
for local governments as outlined below.
I-405/SR-167
Renton urges that there be significant 405 funding within a next transportation investment
package—preferably at least a $960 million funding level that allows construction
timetables to be expedited and also supports tolling and managed lanes efforts.
State, Local, Freight Mobility and Transit
Renton supports enhanced funding for the Transportation Improvement Board (TIB), the
Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board (FMSIB), and other grant programs such as the
“Complete Streets” program.
Renton urges that any package include a direct distribution to cities and counties, as well as
equitably distributed “local transportation funding options” to assist with roadway and
transit needs.
Fiscal Stability
Renton urges lawmakers to protect “state-shared” revenues that are critical for cities and
counties to avoid cuts in funding for public safety needs, and to assist cities with more flexibility
in controlling their costs and providing efficient services.
Restore full excise tax distributions for cities and counties, and restore a percentage growth
in liquor profits for cities and counties.
Provide cities and counties with sustainable revenue options for the long term.
Preserve the Annexation Sales Tax Credit program and Streamlined Sales Tax (SST)
mitigation payments.
7e. - Executive Department recommends
approval of the 2014 State Legislative Page 159 of 181
Provide local agencies with public records relief and cost recovery tools so they can focus
their time on responding to the legitimate requests that the Public Records Act was
designed to provide.
Provide cities with flexibility in responding to a State Supreme Court limitation on the
number of indigent defense cases (300 to 400) that any one public defender can handle in a
given year. Absent funding or flexibility, this court mandate could cost several hundred
thousand dollars a year.
Economic Development, Aerospace, and Infrastructure Investment
The City’s highest economic development priority is to make every effort at the local, regional,
state and federal levels to ensure the current 737 NG production ramp-up and the production
of the 737 MAX re-engined airplane are successful. Renton also supports economic
development and infrastructure tools and aerospace training investment to help retain and
create jobs, increase opportunity, and lay the groundwork for economic growth and prosperity
for the long term.
Renton will strongly support industry and key stakeholders’ requests related to the Central
Sound Aerospace Training Center (C-SAT).
Renton supports an incentive package to ensure the 777X is assembled in Washington and
to create additional parts manufacturing opportunities for area suppliers.
Renton will strongly support a coalition effort to restore funds for the Public Works
Assistance Account, a key source of low-interest loans to help cities, counties, and utilities
address their growth and infrastructure demands.
Public Safety
Renton strongly supports funding and tools that assist local efforts to provide vital public safety
service to communities—particularly liquor revenues used for local law enforcement, Municipal
Criminal Justice Assistance payments, auto theft prevention, Basic Law Enforcement Academy
(BLEA) training, E-911 funds, gangs intervention/prevention funds, and sex offender address
verification monies. Additionally:
Renton will support efforts to ensure better reporting of liquor theft and tools to prevent
the incidents in the first place.
Renton urges the Legislature to consolidate laws and regulations on retail (Initiative 502)
and medical marijuana use, and to direct more of the project revenues from marijuana sales
to the local law enforcement agencies that will be impacted by the new I-502 rules.
Enhancing Quality of Life
Renton strongly supports policies, investments, and tools that contribute to a high quality of life
for its citizens.
2014 Supplemental Capital Budget request for downtown revitalization.
7e. - Executive Department recommends
approval of the 2014 State Legislative Page 160 of 181
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Subject/Title:
Final Pay Estimate – CAG-13-119 SWP-27-
2057, Maplewood Creek and Madsen
Creek Sediment Basin Cleaning Project
2013
Meeting:
Regular Council - 25 Nov 2013
Exhibits:
Final Pay Estimate, Notice of Completion
of Public Works Contract
Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board:
Public Works
Staff Contact:
Ron Straka, Surface Water Utility Supervisor, x7248, Daniel
Carey, Surface Water Engineer, x7293
Recommended Action:
Council Concur
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required: $ 4,380 (Final Pay Est.) Transfer Amendment: $na
Amount Budgeted: $ 180,792 Revenue Generated: $na
Total Project Budget: $ 180,792 City Share Total Project: $ 100%
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
Kamins Construction started construction on the Maplewood Creek and Madsen Creek Sediment Basin
Cleaning Project 2013 on August 19, 2013, and completed the work on October 21, 2013. The project
included installing temporary diversion dams, dewatering the sediment basins, fish rescue, removing
accumulated sediment, refilling the sediment basins, and restoration and hydroseeding. The original
contract amount was $76,020.38 and the final contract amount is $79,550.66. The increase of $3,530
was due to minor changes in bid item quantities.
The project is funded by the Surface Water Utility’s Capital Improvement Program’s Maplewood Creek
Sediment Basin Cleaning account (#427.475060) and the Madsen Creek Sediment Basin Cleaning
Project (#427.475050) account. The approved 2013 budget for both accounts is $180,792. There is
sufficient budget remaining in the approved 2013 budget for both accounts to fund the final pay
estimate and staff costs.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Accept the Maplewood Creek and Madsen Creek Sediment Basin Cleaning Project 2013, approve the
final pay estimate, and release the retainage of $3,632.45 after 60 days and after all the required
releases from the state have been obtained.
7f. - Utility Systems Division submits
CAG-13-119, Maplewood Creek and Page 161 of 181
7f. - Utility Systems Division submits
CAG-13-119, Maplewood Creek and Page 162 of 181
7f. - Utility Systems Division submits
CAG-13-119, Maplewood Creek and Page 163 of 181
7f. - Utility Systems Division submits
CAG-13-119, Maplewood Creek and Page 164 of 181
7f. - Utility Systems Division submits
CAG-13-119, Maplewood Creek and Page 165 of 181
9a. - Interlocal agreement with
Washington State Criminal Justice Center Page 166 of 181
9a. - Interlocal agreement with
Washington State Criminal Justice Center Page 167 of 181
9a. - Establishing the 2014 property tax
levy (See 8.a.)Page 168 of 181
9a. - Establishing the 2014 property tax
levy (See 8.a.)Page 169 of 181
9b. - Decreasing water utility tax (See
8.a.)Page 170 of 181
9b. - Decreasing water utility tax (See
8.a.)Page 171 of 181
9c. - 2013/2014 Mid-biennium budget
adjustment (See 8.a.)Page 172 of 181
9c. - 2013/2014 Mid-biennium budget
adjustment (See 8.a.)Page 173 of 181
9c. - 2013/2014 Mid-biennium budget
adjustment (See 8.a.)Page 174 of 181
9c. - 2013/2014 Mid-biennium budget
adjustment (See 8.a.)Page 175 of 181
9d. - Deed of donation from Erwin & Scott
for S. Carr Rd. properties (See 8.d.)Page 176 of 181
9d. - Deed of donation from Erwin & Scott
for S. Carr Rd. properties (See 8.d.)Page 177 of 181
9d. - Deed of donation from Erwin & Scott
for S. Carr Rd. properties (See 8.d.)Page 178 of 181
9d. - Deed of donation from Erwin & Scott
for S. Carr Rd. properties (See 8.d.)Page 179 of 181
9d. - Deed of donation from Erwin & Scott
for S. Carr Rd. properties (See 8.d.)Page 180 of 181
9d. - Deed of donation from Erwin & Scott
for S. Carr Rd. properties (See 8.d.)Page 181 of 181