The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA86-110 13ENNTT GIovp 5729 Lake View Drive Kirkland, WA 98033 USA MwmmmF'r ,, Marilyn H. Rodgers 1709 Jones Drive S.E. Renton, WA 98055 13INNTT GROUP 5729 Lake View Drive Kirkland, WA 98033 22 Robert Barnhart 1633 Jones Drive S.E. Renton, WA 98055 J3ENNETT GQOUp -- ,_ 5729 Lake View Drive Kirkland, WA 98033 i::: .,-., -.1 Raymond Berry 1626 Jones Drive S.E. Renton, WA 98055 BENNETT G;Oip ,..„ USA 5729 Lake View Drive Kirkland, WA 98033 22 Belle Snellson 1708 Grant Avenue So. Renton, WA 98055 J3INNTT GQovp 5729 Lake View Drive Kirkland, WA 98033 USA 22 — ;-- Sarah E. McDonald 1600 Grant Avenue So. Renton, WA 98055 BEGINNING OF FILE FILE TIT / f tfO ' 8 (ô '" i CoCITY of RENTON eel BUILDING DIVISION Earl Clymer, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Building Official December 30, 1988 • Todd Bennett • Bennett 'Pratt Group 5729 Lakeview Drive Kirkland, Washington 98033 Subject: Heritage Village Apartments 162.6 Grant Avenue South, Renton Building Permit No. B-13468 Dear Mr.' Bennett: The Planning Division of the City's Community Development Department has received a complaint that the exterior lighting of your above referenced apartment building complex under construction is causing too much glare to the residents to the east of your property. In response, this office made an inspection and noted that there is an exterior flood type light located on the east side of Building No. "C" that is pointed in the uphill direction of the single family homes. This apparently is • the cause of the complaints we have received. Would you please, contact your contractors and have them rearrange the direction of the flood light so that it shines downward on the site rather than in the broad easterly direction it currently does. A prompt response in correcting this matter will be appreciated. Sincerely, Jerry F. .Lind Land Use Inspector/Landscape Planner :, jfl:bennett:dsk4 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 A 3437Z ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE SITE PLAN REVIEW FEBRUARY 3, 1987 PROJECT: Heritage Village Apartments PROPONENT: Bennett Group, Inc. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of 30 multi-family units on 1.85 acres of property zoned R-2 and R-3. FILE NUMBER: SA-110-86 ISSUES: 1. Whether the site plan is efficiently laid out in terms of use, vehicular circulation, pedestrian circulation, and common open space? 2. Whether the site plan makes sense in terms of its relationship to future development to the north or south in terms of pedestrian and vehicular linkages? 3. Whether the bulk and scale of the development is compatible with the surrounding area? and 4. Whether sufficient landscaping and pedestrian amenities have been provided on site? ANALYSIS: The subject proposal does not conform with the Comprehensive Plan which designates this area as Greenbelt and Single-family. The subject proposal does conform rwith the R-2 and R-3 zoning for this area which allows multi-family housing. The R-2 piece to the east allows duplexes only whereas the R-3 piece allows multi-family at 25 DU/AC. The site will be buffered with landscaping (8 feet high) between itself and the properties to the north, east and south. The site has been organized with a vehicular spine that runs east-west and which is oriented visually on to the common open area and landscape buffer on the hillier portion of the site to east where it abuts a single-family devlopment. Parking areas are laid out in a perpendicular fashion to this spine thereby reducing the likelihood of cars manuevering in and out of spaces blocking overall vehicular circulation Pedestrian circulation runs parallel to this spine and links up to the play- space focal point on the hill at the east end of the site. As a consequence, most pedestrian circulation is relatively independent of the parking areas, only crossing them at their entrances. The units are clusterred into smaller buildings housing four to six units each. These in turn are sites parallel to the vehicular/pedestrian spine on the R-3 portion of the site and consequently are spaced at least forty feet (40' ) apart. Those in the R-2 zone at the east end of the site are sited perpendicular to each other and are approximately forty feet (40') apart also. As a consequence, Staff believe the siting provides adequate light and air circulation for all units. The siting of the buildings on the site in conjunction with existing landscaping should adequately block out most noise eminating from the site. The Hearing Examiner's condition limiting the of size and height of any building within 250 feet of the east property line to a height of 35 feet above existing ground elevation and a maximum footprint of 4,000 sq. ft. also mitigates harmful effects on nearby properties. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COmmiTTEE SITE PLAN REVIEW FEBRUARY 3, 1987 PAGE 2 FINDINGS: 1. The subject proposal minimizes undesirable impacts on surrounding properties as a consequence of its site layout and landscaping. 2. The bulk and height of buildings are consistent with or more restrictive than what the zoning allows. 3. Although transitions have been provided for development within the site, without knowing more about eventual development to the north or south it is difficult to determine what types of linkages should be developed to these undeveloped properties. As currently laid out, it would appear that pedestrian linkages would have to occur through the existing parking areas. Likewise, vehicular circulation would have to be through these same areas. 4. The restrictions imposed by the Hearing Examiner at the time of rezoning limiting building heights and total density on the site to 30 DUs should ensure reasonable compatibility with surrounding areas. The 30 foot height limit at the east end of the site would appear to address the view impaction concerns of the property owner to the east. Likewise, the landscape buffer at the east end of the site should address concerns about noise from structures and the recreation area. DECISION: Based upon the above, Staff conclude that this project complies with the criteria for site plan approval. We would recommend the following conditions of approval for this site: 1. That a pedestrian linkage be provided between the southern building at the east end of the site and the east-west pedestrian spine; 2. That security devices, including exterior key only deadlocks, be provided at the entrances of all dwelling units as well as on all windows and sliding doors; 3. That automatic sprinkler systems be installed in buildings #2, 3, 5, and 6 in lieu of secondary access; 4. That sidewalks be treated with a decorative finish and pedestrian scaled lighting be provided along its length; and 5. That benches be provided near the mailboxes. TRANSMITTED THIS 6th day of February, 1987 to the parties of record; Todd Bennett Bennett Group, Inc. 5729 Lake View Drive Kirkland, WA 98033 TRANSMITTED'THIS 6th day of February, 1987 to the following: Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch Richard Houghton, Public Works Director Larry M. Spring, Policy Development Director Ronald Nelson, Building and Zoning Director Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Members, Renton Planning Commission Glen Gordon, Fire Marshal Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Renton Record Chronicle ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW CG,,,s.TTEE SITE PLAN REVIEW FEBRUARY 3, 1987 PAGE 3 REQUESTS FOR RECONSIDERATION must be filed in writing on or before 5 p.m. on Wednesday, September 10, 1986. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Site Plan Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available prior to the meeting date of August 20, 1986 may make a written request to the Zoning Administrator for review by the Site Plan Committee within fourteen (14) days of the decision, which is Wednesday, August 27, 1986. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Committee may, after review of the record, take further action as it deems proper. AN APPEAL TO THE HEARING EXAMINER is governed by Title IV, Section 3011(B)(1), which requires that such appeals be filed directly with the Hearing Examiner. Appeals must be made in writing before 5 p.m. on Wednesday, September 10, 1986. THE APPEARANCE OF FAIRNESS DOCTRINE provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process for site plan approvals include: (1) the Public Works Director, (2) the Building and Zoning Director, (3) the Policy Development Director, (4) the Hearing Examiner, and (5) members of the City Council. All communications after the decision date must be made in writing through the Zoning Administrator. All communications are public record and this permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence in writing. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial Committee decision, but to all Request for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the Hearing Examiner. j tJJ l-I I�L 3437ZLE. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE SITE PLAN REVIEW FEBRUARY 3, 1987 PROJECT: Heritage Village Apartments PROPONENT: Bennett Group, Inc. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Application for site plan approval to allow the con- struction of 30 multi-family units on 1.85 acres of property zoned R-2 and R-3. ISSUES: 1. Whether the site plan is efficiently laid out in terms of use, vehicularcirculation, pedestrian circulation, and common open space? 2. Whether the site plan makes sense in terms of its relationship to future development to the north or south in terms of pedestrian and vehicular linkages? 3. Whether the bulk and scale of the development is compatible with the surrounding area? and 4. Whether sufficient landscaping and pedestrian amenities have beenprovided on site? • ANALYSIS: The subject proposal does not conform with the Comprehensive Plan which designates this area as Greenbelt acid Single-family. The subject proposal does conform with the R-2 and R-3 zoning for this area which allows multi-family housing. The R-2 piece to the east allows duplexes only whereas the R-3 piece allows multi-family at 25 DU/AC. The site will be buffered with landscaping (8 feet high) between itself and the properties to the north, east and south. The site has been organized with a vehicular spine that runs east-west and which is oriented visually on to the common open area and landscape buffer on the hillier portion of the site to east where it abuts a single-family devlopment. Parking areas are laid out in a perpendicular fashion to this spine thereby reducing the likelihood of cars manuevering in and out of spaces blocking overall vehicular circulation Pedestrian circulation runs parallel to this spine and links up to the play- space focal point on the hill at the east end of the site. As a consequence most pedestrian circulation is relatively independent of the parking areas only crossing them at their entrances. The units are clusterred into smaller buildings housing four to six units each. These in turn are sites parallel to the vehicular/pedestrian spine on the R-3 portion of the site and consequently are spaced at least forty feet (40') apart. Those in the R-2 zone at the east end of the site are sited perpendicular to each other and are approximately forty feet (40') apart also. As a consequence Staff believe the siting provides adequate light and air circulation for all units. f / ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW C. ;TTEE SITE PLAN REVIEW FEBRUARY 3, 1987 PAGE 2 The siting of the buildings on the site in conjunction with existing landscaping should adequately most noise eminating from the site. The Hearing Examiner's condition limiting the of size and height of any building within 250 feet of the east property line to a height of 35 feet above existing ground elevation and a maximum footprint of 4,000 sq. ft. also mitigates harmful effects on nearby properties. SUMMARY: Staff believe the subject proposal minimizes undesirable impacts on surrounding properties as a consequence of its site layout and landscaping. Likewise the bulk and height of buildings are consistent with or more restrictive than what the zoning allows. Although transitions have been provided for development within the site without knowing more about eventual development to the north or south it is difficult to determine what types of linkages should be developed to these un- developed properties. As currently laid out it would appear that pedestrian linkages would have to occur through the existing parking areas. Likewise, vehicular circulation would have to be through these same areas. The restrictions imposed by the Hearing Examiner at the time of rezoning limiting building heights and total density on the site to 30 DUs should ensure reasonable compatibility with surrounding areas. The 30 foot height limit at the east end of the site would appear to address the view impaction concerns of the property owner to the east. Likewise, the landscape buffer at the east end of the site should address concerns about noise from structures and the recreation area. CONCLUSION: Based upon the above, Staff conclude that this project complies with the criteria for site plan approval. We_would recommend the following conditions of approval for this site: 1. That a pedestrian linkage be provided the southern building at the east end of the site and the east-west pedestrian spine; 2. That security devices be provided at the entrances of all dwelling units as well as on all windows and sliding doors; 3. That automatic sprinkler systems be installed in buildins #2,3. 5, and 6 in lieu of secondary access; 4. That sidewalks be treated with a decorative finish and pedestrian scaled lighting be provided along its length; and 5. That benches be provided near the mailboxes. APPENDIX ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE SITE PLAN REVIEW FEBRUARY 3, 1987 COMMENTS FROM REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS: Varios City departments have reviewed and commented on the project as follows: Parks and Recreation: Recommended approval with conditions as follows. The revised plan has successfully addressed many of the issues. The remaining concerns are as follows: 1. Is the walkway that extends the full length of the development asphalt or concrete? Concrete is the preferred material because it will tie in nicely with the sidewalks to the units, and it will contrast with the asphalt paving of the driveways and parking lots. 2. Can the mailbox at the east end of the development be relocated in the "Town Square" area? 3. Can the mailbox enclosure on the western portion of the site include a light pole and branch? Utility Engineering: Recommended project not approved due to need for water and sewer plan. Fire Department: Recommended approval with the following conditions: 1. Buildings #2, 3, 5 and 6 are to be protected by an approved automatic sprinkler system in lieu of a second means of access. 2. All fire codes and ordinances are to be complied with. 3. A looped approved water main to be installed to adequately supply water to the auto sprinkler system and required fire hydrants. 4. A hydrant is required to be within 150 feet of each building .with a secondary hydrant within 300 feet of a building. -2- Engineering: Not approved due to the need for the following: 1. Install sidewalks. 2. Storm drainage to be designed based upon a 5 year release and a 25 year storage. 3. Storm and utility plans to be on separate 22 x 34" original mylars. NOTE: These comments are more pertinent for building application. Building Department: Recommended approval. Traffic Engineering: No recommendation; comment stating driveway to be 30 feet in width at entrance. Policy Development: Recommended approval. Comments below: 1. The proposed project is consistent with the existing zoning for the subject site and conforms generally to the rezone requirements of approval as per the Hearing Examiner and City Council. 2. Although not in conformance • with the Comprehensive Plan, the area development is much the same as this proposal and the Comprehensive Plan designation of single family is probably outdated as discussed in the rezone application. Zoning Division: Recommended approval with following condition that coniferous trees proposed along eastern property line as a buffer be increased from 5'-6' to 8'+. NOTE: Applicant has satisfied this concern. Police Department: Recommended approval with the following conditions: 1. Solid core wood or metal entry doors with deadbolt lock. 2. Pin or bolt locks on sliding patio doors. 3. Track locks on sliding windows. 3438Z / -I;7-ti. 5 . ,, EQ.„„,,,* 0,4-....„,„_„.... .y„.„..„6,_ A.,--) .I %, 1.(bc.> - . il \ -6414 . '. .9r(DIpLQ..A Sk.cAle,Q.) 4:11a.Per 1- La . PCeibLn— • ---6 1 6,Z.ge-....-- Oik /r L,_ L k w (6 ee• 6 -c -ob ON- %.}cA> { . II (0_o-0). I • ___ . U. . .erse..ek Z a\,_-'a: It.-) fie-&. 'r L, p si.., II — 5 � I , l I t) t k- l b c_-4_,sng cam°c\-. C.N.J.Pal--.- .4%-ab g U f - ______ ,L, _____ li -'70.( . _ - __ f .KV.-j - --. asp +--�� c3 4- 1/43S-e o __ — i R l f1\n.,:1n cam.mar. : N?u C-t... .,.cam. ' ,i o A "cJ"tti?oS-c, - ____ _______\i,. I � fl II _ L„/ . i)Ss-. . Vi A tatkLv� / u �-- 6- e.. c t_.0 111.`Tv U'AN..a. k- U �1 �. 0-nJ 0 ,.) tom- tpA, C C laArlf-42-0 " 1 to tiL+A-5 -4� .`h , t:IL _, , -- ln.�r A.-�. �12n g,cS,--ts , c-avz.fvA-, boa..d-ate A-,-ek. jpcc.._c.cl ,.sa:L- w 7 s. ' eArs . 1 V:C 0A__Si..J 1 1 %_ 1,4-_D_L.._._1 __00.... _ `.--A/ -,-------t-- t•---,:-L., L)i-_-s.2. _--: _ " _ ai6gor._/_._16,_, ct-k-e A .--La---.()'a- C-e‘-`-`-'?e -A- ' I 2e-‘7 L"-cCi=&'' t �,__-_ • i 6 t.A..T'1x„( FiV'v Cam)CUz_ I S �JC' 1 ry C�Q.J . ii • . ,2o.. L c C.VL},r� o-`s+.. Ite9k i h._-v._t_d-,:()Jr.._ of cYV r } e.-LAC. '° V ycl- ct ..e_.. 0-cT..._e-d- c?CS c_. B c G-25w1--L , C _cs.,trT o x I.5 [f0 '-�" PJ - ( �••7 wi'4J k.. Q S '_�1 Cyr ---- m��'�-._. `�'�? _-� Via.-. ..__._.._ ii oa) ti r® - - • 44p.1_S` e -.— -�h&1.t e^--s -A._4-J2-e-A _tom_ _. Ade i2-4L, . _ _.._11 tics A -, L--s/ 1 _ ' '...vs.. NN..._,___�'� - -- ._ `‘, 9� ____ - -_ _ i 1 - . . NOTICE • . ENVIRONMENTAL I ' DECLARATION APPLICATION NO. ECF-091-86 & SA-110-86 • APPLICANT BENNETT GROUP, INC. (HERITAGE VILLAGE APARTMENTS) PROPOSED ACTION APPLICATION FOR. SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF. 30 MULTI FAMILY UNITS ON '1. 85 ACRES OF. PROPERTY ZONED ' R-2 & • GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS • ; 1626 GRANT AVENUE' S. POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS' OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (E.R..C.) 'HAS DETERMINED THAT THE • PROPOSED ACTION . • DOES XaDOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON ,THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT • WILL ►: WILL NOT 'BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF R.ENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS 'PROPOSAL FOR 1.5 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY DECEMBER 8, 1986 . . AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE 'RENTON. HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., DECEMBER 8; 1986 . FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON , BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT AT .235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION. OFA. R� �� ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR 09amen � _ _ MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 • 235-2540 4 0 9�rEo sEP1EM��P BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR December 3, 1986 Reed Cahill 9105 N.E. 1st Street Bellevue, WA 98004 Subject: Heritage Village Apartments File: SA-110-86, ECF-091-86 Dear Mr. Cahill: This letter is written as a follow up to our telephone conversation on December 3, 1986, regarding the above referenced site plan approval application. When the City's Environmental Review Committee reviewed the application on November 19, 1986, they issued a determination of Non-Significance for the project. They withheld approving the site plan, however. There was a concern about the recreation area at the eastern end of the site on how it was to be linked with all of the housing on the site. Upon viewing the site plan, it tends to be linked directly to buildings "3" and "6" and has an appearance of isolation from the other four buildings. What the Committee would like to see is a revised site plan showing walkways that will interconnect the recreational area with all six buildings. Please provide to the Building and Zoning Department six (6) copies of a revised plan depicting this requested information. Sincerely, Jerry F. Lind Land Use Inspector _ JF::csb:3296Z -IA0 6 TO: RENTON L:,aLD^I,NG AND ZONING DEPARTME_�,-2 SUBJECT: - CONCERNS PROPERTY: EAST SIDE OF 1626 GRANT AVE. S, RENTON OWNER: RICHARD SHORE AS ONE OF THE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY OWNERS BORDERING THE WEST END OF THE SUBJECT SITE, I HAVE THE FOLLOWING CONCERNS REGARDING IT' S PROPOSED S,ie. P%a.,J MY CONCERNS ARE AS FOLLOWS: 1. LOSS OF SCENIC VIEW IF THE HIGHT OF THE PROPOSED STRUCTURES IN THE EASTERN PORTION OF THE SITE EXCEEDS 30' THIN THERE IS A POSSIBILITY THAT MY WESTERLY VIEW (W THE VALLEY AND OLYMPICS WILL BE OBSTRUCTED. THIS 30' LIMIT IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AS THE EXACT HIGHT CAN ONLY BE DETERMINED BY ACTUAL OBSERVATION AND MEASUREMENT PRIOR TO APPROVAL. 2. LOSS OF PRIVACY REPLACEMENT OF THE CURRENT BARBED WIRE FENCE DIVIDING MY PROPERTY WITH MR SHORE'S BY AT LEAST A SOLID 8'WOOD FENCE WOULD BE REQUIRED TO CONTINUE THE SENSE OF PRIVACY I NOW ENJOY. 3. POSSIBLE NOISE POLLUTION ADDITION OF 30 MULTI FAMILY UNITS IS BOUND TO INCREASE THE CURRENT NOISE LEVEL IN THE AREA. THIS NOISE LEVEL COULD BE INTOLERABLE IF THEIR ISN'T AN ADEQUATE BUFFER BETWEEN THE PROPOSED STRUCTURES AND/OR RECREATIONAL AREA AT FAR EAST END OF MR SHORE'S PROPERTY. • IN CONCLUSION, I CAN UNDERSTAND MR. SHORE'S POSITION WANTING TO UTILIZE HIS PROPERTY TO IT'S POTENTIAL. MY ONLY CONCERN IS THAT WITHOUT ADEQUATE INVESTIGATION PRIOR TO ANY ZONING APPROVAL THERE COULD BE SOME SERIOUS ADVERSE AFFECTS TO THE EXISTING TRANQUILITY OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD. RA G BARRY 1625 JONES DRIVE SE RENTON,WA, 98055 HOME PHONE: 235-4974 OFFICE PHONE: 2370292 CITY OffRENTON UU DEC 11986 BUILDING/:_.. Op 3325Z NOTICE OF PENDING SITE PLAN APPROVAL RENTON, WASHINGTON A SITE PLAN APPLICATION HAS BEEN FILED AND ACCEPTED WITH THE BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT. THE FOLLOWING BRIEFLY DESCRIBES THE APPLICATION AND THE NECESSARY PUBLIC APPROVALS: DESCRIPTION: Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of 30 multi-family units on 1.185 acres of property zoned R-2 and R-3. File No. SA-110-86. GENERAL LOCATION: Located at 1626 Grant Avenue South. • PUBLIC APPROVALS: 1. Site plan approval 2. Building permit The application can be reviewed at the Building and Zoning Department located on the third floor of City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to public hearings and during public hearings. For further information on the application or dates of final action by the City, please contact the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2540. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Building and Zoning Department. Ronald G. Nelson Building and Zoning Director CERTIFICATION I. JERRY F. LIND, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT FIVE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS WERE POSTED BY ME ON NOVEMBER 19, 1986, IN FIVE (5) CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON OR NEAR THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn. to before me. a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing in pA- - . on the day of . , ORES C, • •.•••••.• 6 . (Qt_ip/Lxv ,„BeivAit S m SIGNED: r, �.1vv�CL ,Q m �; • `9 �GCGal.IC *�_ • ‘(.,‘O•' 8 i 9° `\ is1 s 1 2119N CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO.: ECF-091-86 APPLICATION NO(s).: SA-110-86 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of 30 multi family units on 1.85 acres of property zoned R-2 & R-3. PROPONENT: Bennett Group, Inc. (Heritage Village Apartments) LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Property located at 1626 Grant Ave. S. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department. The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. There is no comment period for this DNS. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 235-2550 APPEAL: You may appeal this determination in writing to Renton Hearing Examiner no later than December 8, 1986. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. DATE OF DECISION: November 19, 1986 PUBLICATION DATE: November 24, 1986 Ronald G. Nelson La y . Sp i ger . Building and Zoning Director Policy Devel men irector Richard C oughton ' Public W s Director • • • • • AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION • NOTICE'OFENVIRONMENTAL- �; DETERMINATION t' fr-•, ' ENVIRONMENTAL';, )� T:''it'•REVIEW COMMITTEE - _ `'r AudrAy i) Jole ,•being first duly sworn on oath states that ON;=WASHINGTON4; °., he/she is the Chief Clerk of the ,t The,Environmental'Review.Committee:A (ERC);has issued a declaration of,NON-.;a • ; 'SIGNIFICANCE for the following project::,; • VALLEY NEWSPAPERS t SA=,1,t]r8fi^ . ':I (.. I ;. BENNETT".GROUP; `INC. '(HERITAGE ;VILLAGE APARTMENTS):Application for • Daily News Journal, Daily Record Chronicle, Daily Globe News site plan approval to allow the construction' of'30`multi:family4.units on;.1:85acres of.°i Daily newspapers published six(6) times a week.That said newspapers 4 property;zoned-R-2r.A R-3:;Property i)o-!a l are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six V1„c•atedat,162s Grant,Avenue S.> .=a If Further information regarding this action months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published is,available,in the.._Building and Zoning in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King ^Departnient; Municipal Building;Renton,,,- Count Washington. ValleyNewspapers have been approved1:',Washington, _ust be-filed with the of. Y, g as legal I:�ERC action must'be filed with the Renton''' newspapers by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for „Hearing•Examiner by Debem6ar'e, ises.° King County. Published in the Valley Daily News Nov.;; The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Daily News Journal_, Daily Record Chronicle__X_, Daily Globe News , (and not in ..supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice a Notice of Environmental. Determination was published on 1 cvernbor 214, 1986 i 1953 The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the • sum of$ 16.3)1 • Subscribed and,sworn to before me this 2 t h day of irc v 19 e 6 • • Notar ublic for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, CITY OF RENTON King County, Washington. D r VI g VN#87 Revised 10/84 L DEC 8• BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. ir 2118N AMMOd NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a declaration of NON-SIGNIFICANCE for the following project: ECF-091-86 BENNETT GROUP, INC. (HERITAGE VILLAGE APARTMENTS) SA-110-86 Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of 30 multi family units on 1.85 acres of property zoned R-2 & R-3. Property located at 1626 Grant Avenue S. Further information regarding this action is available in the Building and Zoning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. Any appeal of ERC action must be filed with the Renton Hearing Examiner by December 8, 1986. Published: November 24, 1986 OF 4ti • - ' NOVEMBERI 19,•,1986 : G 2 y.. 044?fO SEPSEM®�P • • OF PENDING ' pLAN AppucATION DESCRIPTION : SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-110-86 . • .: APPLICATION•FOR 'SITE PLAN 'APPROVAL' TO ALLOWTHE CONSTRUCTION OF '30'MULTI 'FAMILY UNITS . ON 1.85 ACRES OF PROPERTY ZONED R-2 & R-3: ' • I . . 4 - GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS: . • 1626 GRANT AVENUE 'SOUTH. . •I • • • • • • PUBLIC APPROVALS REQUIRED : i • • , ., • • • 1.) SITE PLAN APPROVAL ' • 2.) BUILDING PERMIT • " PUBLIC COMMENTS .WILL BE 'RECEIVED BY ; THE BUILDING '& ZONING DEPARTMENT ANYTIME PRIOR TO PUBLIC HEARINGS • • AND DURING PUBLIC HEARINGS. ***** . COMMENTS WILL BE •RECEIVED UNTIL DECEMBER' 3, 1986, 5:00 PM. ***** FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY. OF RENTON • BUILDING & ,ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 THIS' NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION ,, , , ..... . ;, :,.; ,,,i -5 ..,,,.) ., -,) BENNETT CPOUP :. ..,i ,,a a s f_ •I./ I� , f October 31, 1986 A101/ �Q 4� 11 41 v86 'z; City of Renton ; Building & Zoning Department ,.1 300 Mill Avenue So. 1 Renton, WA 98055 RE: SA 110 86 Y N '-,J Enclosed please find name and address information for the above referenced file. Feel free to call if you have any questions or if further information is required. Sincerely, I BENNETT GROUP, INC. 7Aodd R. Bennett 1 President '' Enclosure - TRB/kn/27COR qq21 v y .6 t l Fl jt 0 i I 5729 Lake View Drive • Kirkland, WA 98033 • (206) 827-7436 • ' - Heritage Village Apartments 1626 Grant Avenue So. Renton, Washington S`Y 1) Southeast - Lot 5 Marilyn H. Rodgers Rolling Hills 1709 Jones Drive S.E. .. Renton, WA 98055 226-4717 ! 2) East - Lot 6 Robert Barnhart Rolling Hills 1633 Jones Drive S.E. 1 Renton, WA 98055 xxx-xxxx 3) Northeast - Lot 7 Raymond Berry '-, 1626 Jones Drive S.E. -`' i;j Renton, WA 98055 1 235-4979 1 4) South Belle Snelson -1 1708 Grant Avenue So. =a Renton, WA 98055 :{ ;; 255-4457 5) North Sarah E. McDonald j 1600 Grant Avenue So. Renton, WA 98055 a 228-7322 ri 1 1 /27HVA 4 4 , 5 .t a d 5 i' i 11' ( 1 .: _ Y� o (./1TY OF RENTO14 FILE NO(S): €4 — -8(c) \ V © BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT " F--OgI-` o ♦ NIA MASTER APPLICATION -- NOTE TO APPLICANT: Since this is a comprehensive application form, only those items related to your specific type of applications) are to be completed. (Please print or type. Attoch additional sheets if necessary.) APPLICANT TYPE OF APPLICATION NAME FEES Bennett Group, Inc. Q REZONE*(FROM TO ) ADDRESS rr--� 5729 Lake View Drive u SPECIAL PERMIT* CITY ZIP TEMPORARY PERMIT* Kirkland 98033 CD CrADITIONAL USE PEtR.1IT* SITE PLAN APPROVAL TELEPHONE 206-827-7436 0 SPECIAL PERMIT FOR GRADE AND FILL No. of Cubic Yards: CONTACT PERSON Q VARIANCE* From Section: * Justification Required NAME • Todd Bennett ADDRESS SUBDIVISIONS: Same Q SHORT PLAT CITY ZIP Q TENTATIVE PLAT Q PRELIMINARY PLAT TELEPHONE Q FINAL PLAT C:] WAIVER (Justification Required) OWNER NO. OF LOTS: NAME PLAT NAME: Same ¢_ . ADDRESS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: Q PRELIMINARY CITY ZIP 0 FINAL TELEPHONE P.U.D. NAME: 0 Residential Q Industrial L.__l Commercial Mixed LOCATION . MOBILE HOME PARKS: PROPERTY ADDRESS ILoZfp Caller i A` .. �:.o Q TENTATIVE EXISTING USE `J rl /`}V vP�RESENT ZONING PRELIMINARY FINAL Single Family R-2 & R-3 PROPOSED USE PARK NAME: Multi-family residential (30 units) NUMBER OF SPACES: 13, ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE l(QQ%r • AREA: SQ. FT. ACRES TTTT"'�� TOTAL FEES ��O co80, 580 1. 85 -t"�-"— STAFF USE ONLY -- ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING �!11P ra+�r�6rbGd ,;�. DATE r0 Ur {) APPLICATION RECEIVED BY: APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: • ft, . 00T 7 1986 t ' • D Accepted - ' - 0 Incomplete Notification Sent On By: p (Initials) UJIL.,Icy.+/Lly l'v 11Y\3 IJ r.' DATE ROUTED ADDITIONAL MATERIAL RECEIVED BY: APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: ‘t) " Z '61 U Accepted v 0 Incomplete Notification Sent On By: (Initials) ROUTED TO: i1 Building 0 Design Eng. Fire ` Parks �� Police J Policy Dev. Traffic Eng. Eno Utilities REVISED 1-31-84 Legal description of property (if more space is required, attach a separate sheet). See Attached • • AFFIDAVIT • I, 2(p, /) /(Y. being duly sworn, declare that I am 1^jauthorizeu represeniaiive io act ror the property owner, owner of the property involved In this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the in`ormation herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS • 771" DAY OF 19 4 . • NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGT /yN,, R�ESIII?ING AT Whc�y L( � li�i�� • • (Name of Notary Public) (Sipiiature of Owner) � r-//a A)E -3 ��y f �) ��. (.Fworess) (Address) (City) (State) (Zip) (Telephone) Acceptance of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete application. Plans and other materials required to constitute a complete application are listed in the "Application Procedure." Form #174 - _ -1 DASY9 u 1 111 BUD \1/Ll 1D f WI9 E 3• •. _ CITY or:Retnom October 6 1986 9~.1 IME \ 1 1 _\ OCT 7 ig86 Project Narrative • • Heritage Village Apartments BUILDING/ZONING DEPT, 1626 Grant Avenue South Renton, Washington Project The above referenced project is a proposed 30 unit apart- ment complex on 1.85 acres of gently rolling pastoral land just north of the intersection of Grant Avenue South and ' 18th Street in 'Renton. An existing older single family • dwelling and several outbuildings will be demolished to . make way for a complex of six smaller multi-unit buildings of a maximum of two stories. A winding entry driveway thru • • the middle of the complex will help to create a "village" atmosphere initiated by the smaller scale structures in project. Existing trees and hedges will be saved wherever possible to provide mature landscaping between the property and ad- jacent single family homes. An existing pond will be used to whatever extent possible in the 'anticipated storm water • detention system. New landscaping around the pond and the new buildings will help frame offsite views and promote the "natural" feeling of the site development. The dwelling units will be mostly two bedroom units ,with • several three bedroom units to the east end of the property for larger families to be near the proposed play area and • picnic area with its basketball and pickleball pad. The largest building will contain'six dwelling units (three up and three down) with outside stair access and exterior decks or patios. The buildings will have a "New England Village" flavor with horizontal bevel siding, corner boards, and small paned windows with shutters. Between the separate buildings will be smaller parking areas surrounding the out- side property perimeter which will provide parking for a total of 53 cars. A total of 30 spaces will have flat carports. The Heritage Village Apartments will probably be ready to begin construction in early winter-spring 1987 and the project should be available for new occupancy in the summer of 1987. The apartments will be constructed all in one phase and all proposed buildings and landscaping will be totally com- I, r pleted before the project is to be Occupied. 144 ATWCB To ALLCDLJ A SCEAI11ILL11 T Q1111 1 3.2213-D4 9XD\ • 5 D��0E T TEL_L1J lLl��ULL l� K D V.E�I1EW1Jg EP5 . • • HERITAGE VILLAGE APARTMENTS • COLOR SFT,FCTION: • ALTERNATING BUILDINGS USE ALTERNATE COLOR SCHEMES : ; ) ROOF RAKE TRIM — BURGUNDY • • !, ; °`'- •t ise • `SQ.� 'Ve h 7 }�'_ FASCIA AND CORNER BOARDS — WHITE 'jai i.f•�"!�'.V{`'' '°`y ;.-et3..g: . x i4:,.,....,.....h.ze.,,r.. ....,„...44„,„+....,,,..,,,k 1 M. `� ' � � r at SIDING — LIGHT BLUE /'"; 'j 4e }T i i A1,f�'ir.4A R r Sk ice'• , ^i� 2' t 4y r a _ C : .Gam. ,g y , fig y r :. #. L. ROOF RAKE TRIM — TERRA COTTA 4 c`_ • ' x • FASCIA AND CORNER BOARDS '— WHITE • �_ SIDING TAN . _. r r+ •Amory fit. ;T. Ys *.. h'u \ \ riThs..N , PICKET FENCE "BOARDS — WHITE ' - . • ,?.. — aa' I • ATICD(b EL. All_m11-1A glAU1IUJ D@faf22 ' 3322T- ��4 ‘ ter_ :./ HERITAGE VILLA E APA ENTS — PROPOSED BUILDING '� • ��{ `''-=• x', "Pfr • ENTRY LIGHTS , - , Illuminator 0,'•:, �' „r' GD-2612 113" r- ` '.. IC. - ..:V''''Vl...',..:1:41:t.-4A74: \Nil zzi i ' A . LOCK SCREW 1 _t. !,4,> ' 22%" I . . - I i 55 ‘ rJt '--- z"#.r*xrlukni, The Illuminator is the answer when a — ---' ,! �� ""��! Lamp Furnished LO 1156(21.2W) wide ground cover light is needed. It .,e;`;,.' ; • r , ; �xs gives even illumination on driveways, Light Spread 27'Diameter ,' :!" ^'_. ' 3' long flights of steps, terraces and park- .ti, ing area borders. A shield(#2612-S) Alternate Lamps LO 67(6.9W) �f : „ for the downhill side of the II- (See Lamp Chart, LO 89(6.8W) ;;'�?}°`- '-' it , Page 26) LO 93(12.3W) • lumtnator Is available to prevent look- LO 1141(15.8W) `p ing directly Into the light source. :rit.v'''11'4"' 1AF'`�'h . - • LO 1195(35.4W) },k �); tigt� Mounting Cast aluminum ;f,}»;� • '' ±.e, "tr „_,,s,xr;;: spike ''� , Options Shield#2612-S y+ s -:''?if"', •i+;"n:.�,C•.F�r r„,' Shield snaps around shade base and di- TA u �' 'f r > rect light away from sharp cut-off lines on i�,,,r .. iV .` a• ` '�, n�f,;i `+x� + ' ,.,* fences,walls. Shields light from eyes on long ry ',0,74mgq= #2612-5 stairs.All white. `' -. '•• . . . . . : .: . : . .,. . . ... . . . . . . . Pathiiter GD-1112 , ' ` I—. 12" I t , T •-e--- �.- Tcii +::i, z'• •:. 4" 1 SWIVEL >:'r ' rF c;;;"izt 91/a" ,<:-,m ,,. , H. 53Ya" " i• 1. 3 f.:,'• 1. k �/11JIdIIL L. i J1� ` • U�,.1��f/VI In/ END VIEW w rJ • The Pathltter is designed for controlled lighting onto a walkway, narrow Lamp Furnished 2 LO 89(6.8W) planter or garden wall, or into shrub- (Total 13.6W) bery.The adjustable top tilts 90°to the Light Spread At 90° sides and produces a long light pattern (as shown) r':<t;';�*` _. • from each end. Placing the stem at an 4 ft. x 16 ft. �ngleects. produces many additional ef- ; �'-"`""''r`; " Alternate Lamps LO 67(6.9W) (See Lamp Chart. LO 93(12.3W) • • ' • Page 26) LO 1141(15.8W) . . . . • LO 1156(21.2W) : Mounting Cast aluminum i. Spike • . „ AIL • . �. . Navigator • GD-0905 I • . , 1:,r,-.-,..- `,":,,..%,4',...V''-''.!.."•::'4 .• ' T .41111 e�.,... 1I �'`� Xl'wr , „..,, na•:, , , Thy , ..,„: ,. , yt.....,;....,.., , : i_ _. .. . • , ,..:„....,v,,," ..,,,„ . . . --- - ,.? _,. . , ,, ,,,,..,4v,i„....,.. . ..„ ..; .,y.. . : . . !Ills! 4,,.;a,4.. 8" • ••_,. . LOCK SCREW . —..it.Lt hi/iJi Iu\lull_IA IL._ "."--• — The Nautgator uses downitght to add LampFurnished LO 93 (12.3W) safety and beauty to outdoor living• areas. Used to light steps, paths, Light Spread 10'Diameter ` •, ' • �; walkways, and borders, the Navigator can also light corner plantings to visu Alternate Lamps LO 67(6.9W) ally extend garden depth. (See Lamp Chart, LO 89(6.8W) , Page 26) LO 1141(15.8W) LO 1156(21.2W) • Mounting Cast aluminum spike HERITAGE VILLAGE APARTMENTS - PROPOSED PARKING :- • , ,-;iis. • ENTRY LIGHTS ' -;‘' Footliter _ ' /2" a `: 7.,�IX°n . II '''';'''n , ••' ' ., • +1.3-.1..c'&`.•,,,V.,.(-:ry.,_..... 0',,, '1 ' GD-1409 -doegiiih._ T „.„,...,,, . . . ..:.,17,..„...4,..„.„ ......2.1.,„,„.4,4!„ , •.. _A. .., ,.',i'''4.' 011't*:,,.` ... k-7";1'.7." •• ' „....aigatimmikki.._111111•1•1=111M . , , a . . 4 ..„., ,i N � Ur '.r,r l - 121/4" LOCK SCREW ;�-• • ,. �;� ,` ,.-.• \IJI-G_..uiLLi,l, u,,l_h�iIli,.— • 'It � : �, w, • 1 . , Our most popular fixture, the Footltter lr�• % 4s a Lamp Furnished LO 93 (12.3W) _` •. �n: ;:, uses downlights below knee level for :! l k•;,�� h_ safety. Its low profile keeps the light Light Spread 14'Diameter •,' ;* �(''Y%'W 1 �;,;, : .,`' out of your eyes,yet provides a 14-foot ,. y .1 diameter circle of light.A shield is Alternate Lamps LO 67(6.9W) j' �' '.'/',�: G (See LampChart, LO 89(6.8W) • available(#1409-S) for use on the e s_ downhill side of the Footliter to pre- Page.26) LO 1141(15.8W) '= 't- ? 1' ' "A;"'''. vent eye/lamp contact when moving LO 1156(21.2W) -r;- . !.," up the hill. LO 1195(35.4W) k` Mounting Cast aluminum :. o ? spike Options Shield#1409-S z•, , IIIIII Shield snaps around shade base and cll- . . recta light away from sharp cut-off lines on i,:;,+1, 'R="r%si'- _,�••• , , • . .,...i fences,walls.Shields light from eyes on long #1409-s stairs All white. • r'y'r{}tifi i 10 • •'I' ''•'.. OF RA • 4S !1'>, ECF: IEc..F-Cpll-g� . 4: • © z `u�Cityof Rentonlea s�-l�°J�� ENVIRONMENTAL' CHECKLIST 0grED SEPScvo Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43,21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for allproposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impacts. Use of Checklist for Nonproject Proposals: (Please Type or Print Legibly) Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name, of proposed project, if applicable: Heritage Village Apartments, 1626 Grant Avenue So, Renton, WA 2. Name of applicant: Bennett Group, Inc. 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 5729 Lake View Drive, Kirkland; WA 98033 827-7436 • 4. Date checklist prepared: October 1, 1986 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton • . 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Checklist .& Site Plan Review Application October 6, 1986 Building Permit Application December 15, 1986 Begin Construction ary Op RE SON January 15, 1986 Building Occupancy .® L-1 V 110 June 15, 1987 J_.- OCT v, igss :�:. 7. • Do you have any plans .for future additions. expansions, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? if yes. explain. All proposed work is included in this application. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared. directly related to this proposal. A topographic land survey was prepared on February 26, 1986 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. Do not }plow. . • • 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, • if known. " Site plan review SEPA environmental checklist . City of Renton Building, Permit: Mechanical permit, electrical permit I � . 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe 'certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. The project is a proposed. 30. unit multi- family residential development comprised of 6 separate buildings and carperrts for. 30 vehicles with asphalt paved parking on site for 53 automobiles total. 'The site is 159. 49 '. x 544. 66 ' (appoximately 1. 85 acres) and slopes -up from west to east approximately 50 feet difference . in elevations. The buildings are of wood frame with sloping roofs and the maximum building height is -two stories.' A play area is provided on a knoll toward the east property. line. An existing old house and outbuildings will be demolished. • 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topography map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed• plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. • The property is located• on Grant Avenue South near 18th Street. The property is approximately 1 mile uphill to the east of the intersectior of Interstate 405 and Benson Road South. There are several multi-famiJ • projects in the neighborhood and some single family homes immediately adjacent. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one); flat rolling, hilly, steep • slopes, mountainous, other . b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? Approximately 2' feet in. 10 feet (20%) c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, caly, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. The soil is generally sandy loam. • d. • Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. There appears to be no unstable soil visible on the site. - 2 - e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. There will be a small amount of cut and fill necessary for parking lot grading and to adjust finish grades around the separate buildings. All cut and fill material can be accommodated w/on-site material. Total cut? d fill materiE f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use. � so. is abount generally describe. 2, 000 CU. Approximately 23% of the site is building area and 28% of the site •Is asphalt paving; for a total impervious area of 51%. Total landscaping area is 49%. g. About what 'percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? The major portion of non-impervious areas will be in planted lawn which will prevent erosion. Existing lawn areas and planting/ • trees will be retained where possOle. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: 2. AIR I a. What types of emissions fo the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Automobile and construction vehicle ex- haust will be present during the construction process as well as general dust and odors associated with building construction. Where the project is completed, there will be vehicle exhaust and smoke • from wood burning fireplaces -unknown known quantities. b. Are there any off-site sources of emission? Unknown. a. . • . c. Proposed measures to reduce. or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Where possible,. construction debris will be removed from site rather than being burned on site. 3. WATER ' a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. There is a small existing pond in the southwest corner of the property that is fed by a small seasonal creek running east to west along the south property line. The pond has an outlet pipe for •occassional draining. It is anticipated that the pond will be used as part of the storm water run-off retention system. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. • See plot plan for proposed project showing pond location. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site than would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. Does not apply - 3 - 1 4) • Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximately quantities if known. Does not apply • • 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. ' Does not apply 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of • discharge. • rr • • Does not apply • , • b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and appaoximately quantities if known. Does not apply • • 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals . . .; agricultural; etc.). - Describe the general size of the system, the number, of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. Does not apply ' c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Storm water will be collected in gutters and downspouts on the • buildings and thru catch basins in the parking areas. The deten- tion system will probably be composed of some underground pipe storage and the balance of runoff to be stored in the existing pond. ' The detention system will then release runoff into the soil at prescribed flow rates per code. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Oil and gasoline residue• from the asphalt parking areas can enter the surface and ground water system; but in line oil separaters will be used to extract these elements within the detention system. , -'4 - • 1 d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: See item c (2) above 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other la I evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other ga Shrubs grass o crop or grain VI. Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other o water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other o other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Some deciduous and evergreen trees will be removed in the asphalt parking areas. Also some small shrubs''will 'be• removedlaround the existing old h house. Existing trees; srubs,''' and lawn area will be retained wherever possible. '1 c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Unknown. • d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Proposed landscapina will be in buffer areas along all ,4 property lines as shown on the pio plan. . Existing trees, shrubs, and grass areas will be retained wherever pos- sible. Interior project plantings will consist of deciduous trees/shrubs together w/evergreen trees to screen parking areas '& provide privacy and 5. sAtimalion between bldgs. Trees along the driveway on both sides will serve to "soften" the impact of vehicular traffic thru the site. a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: Hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds ther Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Unknown ' c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Unknown • • • • • - 5 - - i • d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife. if any: Natural vegetation and the existing pond which are potential homes for wildlife will be retained. , 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric. natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc., ;. Both electricity and natural •gas is available to the site. Heating will most probably be electric baseboard in each unit. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. The property faces south along the long dimension property line. • The property adjacent to the north is higher in elevation so this project would not inhibit the use of solar energy. applica- tions on that property. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy . impacts, if any: The project will be substantially composed of two story buildings with common walls between adjacent units. There- fore heat loss out of walls will be minimized and heated second floor apartments above the first floor apartments will minimize heat loss upward. All apartment doors and windows will have 7. Environmental Health (continued below) a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. Does not apply 1) • Describe special emergency services that might be required. Fire Department services would be required in the case of a building fire. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: The apartment units will be in several separate buildings and 4 of the buildings which are least accessible will be sprinklered; both of these measures will substantially reduce fire risk. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic. equipment, operation, other)? Traffic from trucks and automobiles on Grant Avenue So. which is adjacent to the site would be the only potential source of noise. 6.c. (continued) insulated glass and insulation to conform to the energy code for Wa.sbington State. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic. construction. operation. other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. During construction, traffic and equipment operations noise would be generated between the hours of 7: 30 am to 6: 30 pm. Once the project is completed, traffic noise from residents automobiles will be generated from approximately 6: 30 am to 8: 30 pm. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: During construction, working noise will be limited where possible to weekdays and mid-day hours (10: 00 am to 6: 00 pm) so as not to disturb local residential neighbors during mornings, evenings and weekends. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Current use is single family residential on this site and those • immediately adjacent. Other uses in the neighborhood are - large multi-family projects. • b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe.. Does not apply • c. Describe any structures on the site. There is an existing two story residence, a detached garage, and two small outbuildings. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? All of the structures will be demolished prior to the new project • construction. . . < < • • • • e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Current zoning is R-2 and R-3 as the result of a rezone on April 17, 1985. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? The comprehensive plan designation is for single family residential. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Does not apply h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. • • Does not apply • i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Approximately 70 people would reside- in the completed apartment complex. • j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? The completed project' would displace a family of four living in the existing residence. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: The displaced family has the opportunity to live in one of the completed apartment units. - 7 - , 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The completed- project is of multi- family scale to be compatible with neighboring multi-family pro- jects. However, the design materials and the smaller scale of th, separate buildings is compatible in scale w/adjacent single famil 9. Housing residences. a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. The project contains 30 units of middle income level housing. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income,housing. One single family dwelling of middle income level is being eliminated.. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: See item 8 (k) 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas: what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. The tallest proposed structure is 30 feet above existing garage to the roof ridge. The principal, exterior building material is horizontal bevel siding. • b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? There would be minimal view blockage by the new structures because existing site trees are taller than the proposed buildings. However, there might be some view blockage due to building density at ground level. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: The apartment project is composed of several small buildings to • reduce the potential view blockage that might be caused by larger more massive structures. The resulting effect will be more of a "village" atmosphere. 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? There might be some glare from apartment windows due to sensets in the afternoon towards Grant Avenue So. as an automobile approaches the project. from the southwest. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Light or glare will probably not be of sufficient intensity to cause a safety hazard. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Street lights on Grant Avenue So. will generally light the entry drive, but should have minimal glare impact. • d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Landscaping along the site perimeter buffer and the higher ground elevation of the prject relative to Grant Avenue South should mitigate any glare impact. - 8 - • ^1 • 12. Recreation • a. What designated and• informal recreational opportunities are in the *immediate vicinity? . -There are no recreation facilities immediately adjacent to the site. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: A play area and picnic area will be provided on the east end of the site, away from the apartment units and separated from automobile traffic. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation • a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. Does not apply 1 i b. • Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. Does not apply . c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Does not apply 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed • access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The vicinity map shows the access to the site by means of Benson Road South, Puget Drive and then Grant Avenue South. The project is approximately 1 mile east of Interstate 405. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximately distance to the nearest transit stop? Unknown c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? The project will contain 53 parking spaces per code. An existing two car garage will be eliminated. • d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). Aside• from the new project entry driveway and parking areas, no new public or private street development will be required. - 9 - e. Will the pro,:..., use (or occur in the immediate v}....:Ity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. • Does not apply f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Approximately 198 vehicular trips per day would be generated, mostly between the hours of 7: 30 - 9 :30 am and 4:30-6 : 30 pm(lowrise=6 . 6 trips/unit/ g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: day) Tenants can carpool to work to reduce the number of vehicular trips. 15. Public Services • a. ' Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection,.health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. The project will increase the need (incremen- tally) 'for additional fire protection, health care, schools, and police protection, based on the influx of approximately 70 new residents to the area. . b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. The four structures to the east on the site will be sprinklered to reduce the risk of fire. 16. Utilities a. Ci - utilities currently available at the site• electricit; natural ga_s_) wate ofuse servio telepho sanitary sewejeptic system, o e b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Water-From 12"o main in Grant Avenue So. Sanitary Sewer-From trunk line in Grant Avenue at manhole 120 feet south of S.W. property corner (in.elevation 300 ' ) Electricity - From an existing power box at the N.W. corner of the site. Telephone - From an existing power box at the N.W. corner of the site. (continued at bottom of page) C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any - declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: _ci Name Printed: Todd R. Bennett ' 16. b. (continued) All utilities will be brought up beneath the central access driveway and branched out to the individual structures. - 10 - #176 11-8-81 LtIA: LA Li li'lildl flip lilt. - d L. Shure Property un Lrant Ave. PARCEL 1 That portion of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 20, Township 23 Worth, Range 5 East u.ii. , described d% follows; Be5tnninq-at the Northeast corner of sa!d subdivision; thence • Sough 0"08.49" Pest slung the East line thereof, 415.79 feet; • thence Westerly, parallel :with the North line of said subdivision, 341.55 feet; Thence South 0°08'49" West 25 feet to the true point of beginning; thence continuing South 0"08'49" West 65 feet; Thence Westerly parallel with said North line 159.35 feet to the Westerly line 'of a tract conveyed to 11.1. Sullivan and Maureen P. Sullivan, his wife, by deed recorded under Auditor's File Ito. 3454902; Thence North 26°18'59" West along said Westerly line, 70.99 feet; more or less, to a line parallel with the North line of said sub_ division which passes through the true point of beginning; thence Easterly 191 feet to the true point of beginning. • Situated in the City of Renton, County of King, state of H cninnrnn Parcel 2 • That portion of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 . • of Section 20, Township 23 North, Range 5 East W.ti. , described as follows; Beginning on the East line of said subdivision at a point which is South 0"08'49" West 475.79 feet from the Ilur•theas t corner thereof; • Thence continuing along said line 15).4'1 toot,-more or less, to a point which is South 0%8'49" West 635.58 feet from said Northeast corner; Thence West parallel with the North line of said subdivision 499.67 r feet; Thence North 26°18'59" West to an Intersection with a line extending Westerly through said point of beginning and parallel with the North line of said subdivision; Thence East along said extended line to the point of beginning; EXCEPT a strip of land 30 feet wide parallel with and adjoining the Westerly line of the above described tract; AND EXCEPT that portion described as follows: Beginning at a point on the North line of the above described tract which is 341.55 feet Westerly of the Northeast corner; thence South 0°08'49" West 25 feet to the true point of beginning; Thence continuing South 0.08'49" West GS feet; Thence Westerly parallel with said North Iinn 159.35 feet to the Westerly line of a tract conveyed to M.E. Sullivan and Maureen P. Sullivan, his wi fe,'by deed recorded under Auditor's File NO. 3454902; Thence North 26°l8'59" West along said Westerly line 70.99 feet, more or less, to a line parallel with the North line of said subdivision which passes through the true point of beginning; Thence Easterly 191 feet to the true point of beginning; Situated In the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington. C.fl 01 fa:N:UN RI [R': (LI [ II \Vj 1-1 0 • FEB 81985 —" f 1 . ENDING OF FILE • . . . . . . . . FILE TITLEt. 1 S l i I BEGINNINU OF FILE FILE TITLE MICROFILMED Sadb 32d • if, SSA — I ID -- : . } • 1I ,t 14 iz y ai . ddW ,1111`1171/\ 591.. ILY1.5_ .. g-iC47.1:3Z rvo11-114 4 N4137 Gn 1.1•on na nn n lw1 1.1 loan. AVM tillH{ A I,4iH: I n•..1:Nlw..,..•.•.....n.a.wan v1.1 14,loam. 1crnn�srJ ,VrrrnlnH �� C 41Y E J44'%tl k 2 DNLva-t -30 G - d 4d),I._ .• _ I•.1.wll n+•..n n,•I.1 a,..w.1•n•..q,...w lwl Y'••'wll•an.T II...wl•lNn.fS.•4R n,q wq1 I,1/ c+eeY 'c u2111 lr e•.ICL x21•e NJv�lll-E44 -73N1- - f�+rnbwoaibM<.o2a'nvr sw0+dc/xlpeve-Wal.J."1"l�lo.l7 . Zr 4 aD+1da�•I dc4Lc'Lz a,c'c. • Jc.uL x; aNiw'41 aa-a ii.Ej. 3�7tfd5_hl`II�t�1fd"- _ 11,1•1.11.1 r.,_w,.,.,,.,.wll•as nN, p ,.I'�-I- wWi II�..,n=w,,Tw n.+nu r.w h'•Ilw...•w.11l'R'. • tLm•G, httL III JS 4+'SL L 121 a nWVZ--aaz' - V 7d1,L '- n 1•ry..SI...al min pin n.n a,n•na i wwp ..- --_-_ 7XIYJJJNR• Q21.JWIdNVli 14fdwr� . .-_ivvldl.J�- 1w. :lwlmuw.Y..•..n.w.n••n�nwn (O31JY,i,4 ii c�N(wnl4 C:a'+VJ.ip.411Hf1a.x O1Al/1f3�oaYldc+,.I Iwaw I•.nr IT.II n • I� /`� lwl f.1M1.41A0..Or{o•wa tl :hNhl�V4.- / �`'---� W.MN vI,tl 1 r--___-1Inn .. .J , 7„I.f 1'1.�Jfb -__-L 4_, d+...:IPI•-.'44-kN14..1` _'LQI cb,vlrlNW b+` `"n (vtUmN C. e�nn,•wll n�.nnlnw.i•-llo+.•af ;,.w"K 1.j �1 11-1 Y=S.Iw.,w € ' c•ay CI. 113lnaolums. -- . .'3 b^e4 P1/4t7Ja1i_ ,�,�yyy C1 11r11<ca'. na.w..i�• r •.aw• •M=11•• j - - rv...0 O4 �rbYJ! .dam...c11Hn•c Ssdl•1.a.LNla i..11.1 /1 a•wlw•A 1•NI lwwuy.n�1.III'o'•oN.l w1 M wlNr i.ln ` fla<n2a \ ., 4 ••n In........••11.111,i.a �,0 1 ,n �� i�l kJI FAQ• _ 6 ry• 3 s.L oral.'[I-WIN abzr11W 41091 1.'+hlsvn E-7 a++v 11--- J - ' ril. �J e Y Sys �lvlstalrlt' �`d11M�n1�I :�JIVINOL _ I sfili ._._, ••I�.n••II •mt •�n.1.n••� wow/.no ra w wl.nla �' �+uvi - NalbnMNn_.'rRltim 1•.[La -' ' . 'arit • Y•Iwlh 1.nlr•.n•n w 1•y got loan.n wwa - - - 4- el..,: 1•Ir..rin I•w11 wn nl nl•1.11-+••wll.n•.N1 __gn w ]w/Y'al wll•1+n awl rl•I•wp Lwl ic.fl.R dwl ww� 5,.. '�TppTQ�J�1,yy __ _ ....�J 6 'yp'.V}.r O'alro- bt la•III bola+no.Own.••w_h•YN N\'w�.Ian Ain= -___.GQ�IIS- {WMI'1� = �/� P56 i 0 I,la Y •gin!f WI w�l tlyw ran nl•1•Ia,•.IloanNlllnW w ll•Y MR.Y..0.0 warn Nrnfw•wawa 8 _ 0.1..0nw non nn•II n••i R 1.11../.n.•awl•ewe s�l9m r uu w •T- • 'i"d?7',Wild M4 JO Hlrvs iotI a•-2101•I i'M W od4 a1-VbJj any a b Vd. � .1.�a _ _'4^tilQ.l-�LT13.23QN(l�V�'77To-d'1f1Ch�r7A3dPfi-d�+� fA.v.i,4g.'7N - ►nMR T'•',Van l l.•1 R'IK n OW.I>, Y .P■®� bnWl..sql•n wc7i.4'ry�1.+t�}�y. '(J-i11f9^a Wh)_S.3NY11•NY T f'1NW 14121:VV "---- • rnwNrl.=w.n n all Ray.e w l.l•..11 In..ry..• • •4nn la /J W.I.K I'01 N • Lk.... •1.w �s-rrnw nrma ..- --2N1k1.J.'1).it�S134tYi?Jt�' Q[i^1771kytf3dNf1-.9�iv.A - •V'1>.l wN^..w..w.l• Imi ow • . SC11' gWsle nlahNlW C1IWa N°11H3n1/ -......tin n.nl•In in.,.1,R 1..1 1•. 1ID••„ '1•M .'... a J.i11+a anv'''t�n1a44.- x79 r'bliAllUlt•W_a_�371A21=arl1101b-netvlT=�I'ioN - ,..p...1.,n 1•••.n n w . i "nv�cva+aa-avucanv 'tit3Yi»J.1'!'JdWdrnrllV'---_-- l nil .3o.wu • i(f•Ir•1..n.. '1M/J.4i�kY Ql➢4 'r1aN0 wine•e nln Min.<,w M.wl•N Ill l.l•..:n*nail.I+n.T 1•N Inn rl•./•will • -1-VML.*ord173T47,icl rniA 3C_OIY ichitt+'70Nn--17MOd _ • ....n..all.011..111.4.1.1 n1 w n nnl s.a1.R awn awe V -.74}�NMvhdal6- • :S�JoN 9311CtCILC . -^ - T /IF' wl.N.w.n.•1•all I+•r.an VW 1•11•+•111 n.. •• Ja.0.41e. •Tr'.5 TT/JC. J ' w•.N.•..w.l 1w1•,•4,lwll..I.•0.••N••II loin In•. • .•1 a uw•loan w'I,1••11•1•f loan.M•••Nwa ow.•. XM(R: ,� �1c�� H19 n;1,":� _LO 131 li d u' / 1N olr.••1•..tt wl 1•...1 i,W tIISI.I•e w44wl•• 7 '-4-V tn.apF m 4 ,orina- [,-7,,ii eyn�yy� I • I i j .- 1,1-. 'Y)• .l-NinK 4, �A•�l„w••wi 5'MI i1w.f:1•-ll Ill>•1iro,�i•tea)�lu..�i•p I - (r Ifs'' cvuu7- N :N• ,fir I}C'IA PN. I i el= _ azss _ '7J,Lf'Li;__ .�,Ps•,{¢ .PB/Y - �- /� --"\ / 1 l - v 1 _ - CL.bn i.'.i< • -\ it We our . ......._, \ ti\" ,H4\ \ .� 411r n da4•a \ IdunaNz•o .. --iviigk.,-,-_,7 Mr1 d 41i1•im-aa-L•o \ i o .�� ;�- . � , O _ l 04 .Eli\ \ \\ \ , . . �' ?.; V \ . . _:_o • . ., *Illt.\\:\ .4....,Tikik ,,,..,,,. .N. -44r,„.......„,„,... 4//ii • .,..,,,N -4 I -\-31.1.• \ ),,m, : ir \ lei-4:<.: 1- .\ 1i L , I \‘'Z rani ........,„7,..._.....„, I -i( . \ ,„ ... .7•011... .- .. ...\z•---_ bM Gowan _._.._.#_.__....,„,,..,,,v i ?-= 1\.\ ` / \ll Ina.n,eG11Hn 24Z=9 .. __ I }�- "^S 4 I I Ai'�W...i.. j �� I Nrly77•Jr I I� ^�� - I el•n 74t-9 , , \I I}yu1 \) ,,, ,, ,... -- \ O 1 I21-Y di-1 S. , �- N all- _ `` ® 8 ,,,,,i.-\\ _,. V I , \ / '" ' mil. ® r---- /11 ... > �I ,\ • \ lI .` I / ��./ ..,.\ � - \ \3\ n• .N an 4I 2I a•/ 1I 'AI 1H -'. oW III <44 I- ,c ° oY ..l 7J ,99'LiG•rt 3.B1••.9Z°Ilo .PB%(T ,r •M. 4alu 1,c uG •K t•S f ��ty"' • - W 11 • . 371-13di9a.g- yN6H 1-jk s h.,__ - • ' • .1 o 1-&."*ZW.-- ' . il- • ._ ....1 1e.t...111 I 7..,takvay, ,.._... , 7aN1111,• _,,,. _ .,.. • ! , - •--- • --- 1.11241MIIIIIIS",mmr.:;.:,-- -'1...•0.. . S---,w.f.= • , ,,, 0 .• • -iffaveia _____ -.4,.., .4--- 1---' °- .01..-- =__ . . A _ __ —_--- ---' 6$i t— .: I 15-1111:Ak1GrO -C_II-DI •-- . _WIEDIRra--0-G-M-Eir--=_. _______ .---."..-.77_77150IUDIg.IG-'0 - , l• -pip tiorfli ouu.pulava.t. .____......... .- • • . • ' . . . • . • - , . . ' • .' • sl 0 q i • W i-- ' - • . . . . — . . ' . .. 1 • . • i - _.7 1 ! .1 it_ -o_ ...•---,0,-. : _-• --,..a .v, . . -----_-______.--,... , . I .,==•-•-__.---• • •• ...,....... _ E El /13----"r • • . . . .,..i-d.1-----..,.----...---------•7.-7-—-—. ___- I—it ME lilt 11111E1- -. 4.-- :g G . ...----.. — ...... _-,..,.-7 . 7=- 1=- .`77=a4r±,-.E ....4 Hu ___--- - - ....• , i sr_ig. • =-111111 _.}-F _ • .L; _ 1-m--11 = -- BM MAN - . '-.-1 ,n -NIP I I. . - 111111 •.-_ -:.-•=----- --,H i __ 1 MI . -,. Ft W"-•IITIMIL __=___ 1 .Altgay„,_. E-...=1.-..-- 11"..1.1=-_- --=--. .—= MEP le EMr411111 =.,=__ _Aaia...- 1 I11.- nu _ f ' -'. 1 . ,,.:,___„.. " t LI a --- -------:_r_...,. 7_-------'-,1:. • ..._= =.--m-z.----m.mr--=•=-*z.•=--=..___z-====*=-' - - -`..'-----=-__ -wes-rEux/A-rima-m-x=HUG::07._..2`----1-1-41„441,34— _Mara-LX.T2A/ATION_IIIILPIFA 0- - -- ---------..7. ---11 _ NC4C11-1 r.i.zvAu-INJILDIN-14 ..4_.) ....--c-&-J/ei.t•d_ ....-.- .: . = 2 6..42.V.ild. . . . • .... .. ' " . --- 10-cP- --- --- I 111 —rrov0 -l . .• I ' [ .; • kl .1 i .4 . . •. . . . • -. . 1 • • • • • • -levy • • //•••• ••••=.1 , I • I•1 dig",..\......4 54 _.,..., ---MrTh ,,IMINEM . IT" -*"t":• SIO' , ...-•-•-.-j-'. I. •M! . ." , ..: -- • II. tr.r i F26- ,,,t,z,„,......._)1 t.e. •fie ---w- • " V41 ,I o . . PArrums UAL•wq) I • 4•• I P§ . --- . PU11-011.161 0 e•PLEX CU II.FINIt51 0 to 112)t. !NMI-91144 0 .1)Li 1. % I 7' i CM. . • , • 4) • . SITE- sE.c-rioLl • < • _ 1 .• . • .• . --....,,, 4. was i'..2.4.0 . 1 . . . . • • L 1 � - • - � ., toI \ -- 1Mi i (�GN61 --- -sfo ri \\\ - y - _-�wa.Ny,lr- .lao w.L.rlt rHr+T - Y \ _ . •ro werwn !r/.1' -V! !,. .!6 I. C '-"/Si.' Ai ar e'ZS'1C'E .L4 -IK_... ,'ID RrWM !L 131 4N. 1/L 110 !M• M1 /Y• N/ HP iY+. Ht Ib W /'•° �J4U .1t1.1 • h q� O• _ Illuu..• oo' .e...„ ,..,-0." V. �, oowvo JIl1I1111r •• T ! a•- • r o xn _ mul1: o.o oYo IlNaonulll;o g o Q' fl •oF... \ tar.. A......-: y. I,! tip II�,✓ a �� i1►L_ _1 . _•o;�'! ' /tea .::, r .:'1 51....:_.:, _,...-----, \--.). . . (—-iiitiArit- - . -7E...'el 10/114-.40 SA raL va \ -1 ,qu•-,!II ii •�..'� mIl If. �' -%:4v.= I la 1= 01 'II:.'•. �( l o ts \ ��-*• \. \�� 1 1 ►71 nmioi I �!'��IhllllihlUi¢ti. � .411II b\ __®; ul b\� ( 1 - _pistil.. P �..) ; ,', tag : i LalII �/j■� ) •#'1IIf Ij°Ir�, 141I11 �,31/''�1mII1R .1�:`�, "�' �. •j,�Q. +` ��'.J► / ii mlmar• rrumunrx�a �toi - .„III .U. !I IIIIy��w' bi(`' ;.,t`,. . I ✓` -! ;;�� .� •..nNy. •-T __ .. ..��, III' :III \ � _li -- allims EJ --i i rcGL"` aaillt h✓ I. Q� i4i 1 ' �T in_unm. �ni \,y •II inn,l- :law, \ 1, At:- s..� i' lit \ A (17.I 1 /V‘.* •, Ctt \. 110 I ' At '.... i :.....\:Itt_3: 4101_ ,11...:.t 1 . 1 IM/ .." 11* •• ,ta A • k tr."-,. . i 1 •gea I'I . .. , •'II lirt, 10,‘ - \ "IN _o AW• ?•-- .ir• - 9° • \.% . 4,314. , p• Villarft Via . ,vise ,,IP (, ...... ) fill ‘ ':It ,...:‘..,___,.•I=.,,'"•>7.iv, , a . 1.' � ,� p ACE r.pi '�:P � jii, i:.)T I`��II�IILr �Jlr �w� �-- f .L-.. 31i �A 1 n0..! ill I ova .....':f��O.u��'_ o :aa G l ,L : :'••�1441t 1y r G-•,4 111111110.`.:r4t IC11111111111111G ...... :;mar. .af ',.1IIIII Mrli 14i/e■-NTVainhp4Sri(ai oap tx, /..Oas n �!� 5-m -' ad Iv es a!'-Ja z - --fsxs7'r c. .--- � S o . ,.'.4 r.li, S M-- Tv ry • TTI Aniu4 • n� Awl o) CA A b - // .riT sCrt�u�e �-b°� } O �� n.ey.GcC%4W torrir)v./ 2 G.W.. L6VDPEr'IR•On T1WPIrCRA/ WGC.°i•• 6,B Icy�IlJC.X-LErY67 .W. H9z1.T TULIr ZFtt M ' T Jgteltivitirlal / OLr q 9 G. F�'f bd'cTG4. �j 11 111�JY-C6S 11DHCYLL2•.UII'1CSTniti/ 'CPI. Et0 3IIIIII+IIIi PKLIY..-`41I As'i / 5[�y. c z�] { 1 Pflbl,�l't�A .Fl/ 5 G41.. HoRTH 1 'nDFOn 1P, .ti y.T_J'-,.--' IL'-!d' PLH_rl VICW • ~ • Minus tmin�+z l`Arrunwi•Is/ le cM- Nib +�il I•arciri 14L1s rlOv/CNria,C.HpKY ,.,r�r .�_ �1 ,_ K1LG. Talti I[!i.Urrb u� 19L>1L 0 PIWrtis CEFISRGFA W11,01 11411R'hV It'cm... en .._.._\ I Cam.. _ S 3 R#W.C-LltprCD TLUM eIOtCF1 IIC/.�Inei� i 0rFl-0'U CEFAaATA %lima-l.Ci I '04.Na p�c�,��yy, • zg�re q. .F.z u1-3 g Mt F•UJI ftGNIEK/01 r.HCwCY Y�.• COlI S¢ o -i- .. off, ( /s W MUnC WKG 34i - / 6rr1Y•GT. P'1 S 1RW.r.t 'A.N ? VS r•Zt.:Sr re�.1 '4 3 GllElccuS IOLYIR rnsi-mri ay. vex.. 1519. • ti. praple.ATIOn SAW L14r7'r ar-14 Mkx.; ee IS f p Afre.A 1.4rg11T •a Ch..6,0G6 I.WCTpIGOf•10, -6 o ,orcnus nuTTp1J it/ IL'[A, 'Allo o"or Xrt-Z v.TioH. Ppurlc. Rx.Wcav 0 McUP9-I'bUgp, MG•RlGsrif 5.-6' HT HIE.; T(rv,L WEED UHTol.INSal.44 15 M69I144, ' audisS Fir. 5 W+Y MtiL�N'G6�(HnvouuD er6u67. TREE STAKING DETAIL >r, PIt1US nll.IRh/ 5'-L'HT. a �11V- DlI•U� rime. i •IsU4W HGTh OPHYLIAJ 5,C.' Kr • yZ, IA WESTEIV'1 HEt-u•rzK v, •(,, cF arlm.uuM .1.roHlwM/ Pr"GAL.e!a w�rf: I< ICJ [gyp CY ....-,,,..A Ties pp I ppp T11cW A'.LIDI'nTAI.K 'r/P1rIGv+T,ti/ .f'STrnaL-Z� _• - t'�� ,� miE ,'nT�olavro „I o� 'I > GS 2.0AL-. ,.bb RWA (rltiMIILA. !! ' . ; . . // 5 dm-. RICHARD WARD ASSOCIATES• �..d5p A. ,1.c . uciiTuzourew aW RAY AeeA �� UI A 2oe-32,.21,p, wo.�l7 I . ,. . - • • ' . ' • - ... - - . , . . ... . .• .- . . . • . ' . •. . . • • . ' . . • .. \ _-Ai, • ' . -_ ..' . • • . . . - • . al • . ' . • - - . . . • ' . • . . . . . . - d‘AN A_I-11N171A . g91,11.1.V.I.G_ • ___ __ -g_iLvt.I2= .rloiLlici -Nik7-371: Z .krit,,,,meta ,,...4krta.. rabiZ . 5'201 X 2 a kiiiga-x --ao 6 -•el 14.1.- = ,4•1•..1.6,j•III..2 sm.2.1 161‘1.1.1..• 0 -ki -.",.1.•.../1•1.....vng.,......•01,•01•SI,..•0100 5 l'..\\ 9 9.1s6,44.tm • G.A./a J:241.r1i - 4 c...XI.x 21.7,14.144141-,10 1 - iga.A-1.---:- (.193n4,-.vcral.Mr44za o.2-mi...44--).04.1,07-ana-N.1.41.Ao-Lc.s slzei7... W2.,fas_ r41 "5"Z ica.04. - ..14,14.1,X-i• -01-602161--3a 2--<4141:1- ' " C14,4.. 4q211.III - J4 5,41.x11 '3 Fak532--All :_ii- navq_Livri• • ([13ddV7K44.11?t1C..14 cv-A41.co.- ain..4 X ClaStrth21 0-Nacirri . ciljj*I"v4-1 - ". : 'Ell•711vrel: 'oar ii- - • ,3./66-11/•.11.1...1•11,1*.6.1.2.11.65.111.5a VI... 1.6112( .".1".11';:%.7,11•717,71=3"...:1"11.;*".".‘11:11"..1.‘ ..2.1 SC•661.11 M..1.1...1.1.6....6... •.,-,..,..r.:ZVX:r7zrint:47,1.:ZO"g:fr,,::::4"., . -ttttt•••••v.,.I.••It...,......•1•11•••••.1••••••K.*. . • / -I Z • 'U U 1,42.1.-Jartl. PI -71v ‘•crtann mi.-T. L .' . 7.1 ci S Z III -s.all Mit1.71- sa1,19001- 1 l'Alftntinss..), ._-.L.1" 19r4..iwcar.#41` . ..11....W.•111,1...1 S..11,..0 ES....1 •011.i./•. 1 I I: • ri"...1c 41rings 4.vrbzial--4--4,4 aramariv: 141,1icnotna4 ..... 77510,11.a.1.1,41 ,---)=1't .._ , . • . Wiliri'1.111211Y-xtrinti1214,plos1.-1,,iar7).zral • • • ' • - . .. . " 2 r_ 114 11,41.M.14-11- 'I.1 :42NINQZ_!_ I. ,-...Thfig;. •- .....se Km .1*1...4.,••••••.d•hp.0.1•••••114 • . 1:•.&-: • lvam-Anli_ -- r+cibriaig•cK'raltill.P.-"Atii.2-:_ c.,;,,•„la ------- ....1 1..1..0.34.1.3....1/ . .• 1 rioarrri :110.11.1eKailf• _e'li • 16•..6.1*.1........""" ...:w1P.,..,...16.14.11.2.4941:4:41,10.1„.11,....1,;11,.111..11...i.....,11.•......•31. • : .. . . . 1 . I . . . rjr- - ..- , . •... . . ...... 1 i t • ' • . ..„.. . . . ,-...- e_rd., _.] 1 I -.., . • • . •:,.. IX 1.11A.0.14.W.;1,1P10301;N.L.••,,J.311.0.111. ' ( . I, i t 1 -AS a • • • • . . • . . • • . . . • (..P FY- ''IMea:37 s.47M7SKIP JO!IVES i0-1.1W2101-111W1 Wier -.-L ..1° . ei' . .'d....F.1..,1.1•.ex 3......1.11•s•..,h...., • . .1.3.11 SCIal.11...riK.1.t•to...4..3.1... 13,34 1.1...MY w.,s.r.e.ses•:-.E. r L8 N 6 (., }, T •3<'K .=IBTIIIIIIIIMI ' .""_,:c_'""""V:Lt:alavir`Orr.Lr_. __-aN-40.-14L-ri2.-arslatirr.-zw<=-01-inchhialtircra- ' . "a"'4'"1-11""'' ''''''''Um.Vd--- --X.IallivAiorts.fV_Witt-tabrir rflaNti 1.1.1.1-VVal' furo4,44tiletarA _-7-_=---- 44......,.......•..ot cl1.1•13.1.3 SS•111.1.1...1 . . 11.0..........1..11....•.3.1.,d•Sr 111,30... , 1.0 4.342k)r- '- .W" Nk.'"'"'"4N" 1,,, -4ANII.J.dirraNzarrp2-ivs-=-arrkaleiggatini_s_in= 7,failm_ .....--2.4,10.al.d31.1.•24.11,1144 41,14,4. - - . 1..11..1.1.......1.v.Mil 011. 1 . .0 6.,..14..11.11.1"1•211'."7:27.6"..711?.....11.41111.. ..1 il It L‘ i j @ al a =1,4,3._ •[114,f..InceiCI"..km-we-tem-ftteretrent • "i2rtio-2.1-111,404.17RNIV - - 4"-Lwk''.12^4"--4"44"0'04.-41.4= X2ci riza1-774rtr•Wia s'AmIlx artricoliaticE--Arin, T-T-rTi :fi........l•.1...1 wit 3.3..1.Pl. .L-rre In.....t - •• NOLNal.so AID i "R _ 1-tiv,i4-kria haspa'aorsda-bi-ible,ci, . s* 71iTY10"6„.11- Or ..•.43•10•,...•••d,dom.,.pi.;•7:1:17:2:',11:Za i 1 ; , 4 - '•. ;Galori..931.1111:1rE. - • INki. • . . .. • .......11•1.11.........1••.3 1.1...MU 1...0:1•1•1,1 :. 150 1.31.11••••Pl.....11 111.11 1.3 1131.1•11..1.1..... •, Z I . . . Aiaillviet .;_. nolez-syL=nrs= I .' 7."1:14'2721:teVite"gire'''sy.s se yes.1•1611 • - . . .....1...1.0111•••Om,.. • - . ••••- 1..,,4.1,1,4. 4Abrdtvel 13/•:.. N1.1 101a_ __ . 13,UP 3.1.0.11134 113.! : 141..X.ri: r=3..•%-•'.1.1.714.76•11•M.11 3.11.13..1.1.1 , T I I •. - 1-1.11.0W • 1,EFrr"._ }IV, 1,11traL.E. .,p .37,....,••••••,.1..g Ave.......cli....••3..13.3.3 l• • 1 . /I •••.........il edi.../1•••••I.IA 1.11.13.•3.11..1.3.4 3.3. , I.I ° I .e. .. . . . , • •- • • ' - , . (-0m44L_ • • -ra pm- • .M-7.•• .• q ensV 1 : -1:1,1sAA* . -J•-er,ge 09 N - • , . LIOW!,712 . ..._.• :- . •• • . • •• ' . , 11171' 1.ientF-77- - • • • 1 1 .g . Wie MP . . V . .1 .a. 7UrZaraT\ ( . •• . . ill..7 \it 111 - ..":7:7,,Lg I• . 116:iiii:IIII:U1-:1 ''' • Mim$111 H ____, . \ 11, \ irx.1-_-____• 1Y\ . , I \ i 0 - 1 Y i r:.• , .. ... . . • - ,...---- In.- .41.....,,,------ ,\ 1 cil , - • • . % . f. Mil sift4ITzkis In 7.: 4 A. . V li• V • ,‘-7- iilltft f .• •''.. • _IP it_MialliaiiIINIbie;j4 L . '-i..' - %.+N )i2 \„,„. \• . . vwxyipeo•-•,..---_ - . .. .. -ON •. :.._ YM '4** . -AO k Ali 1.' . .... ..zir,..N _-_ --- -:....woe& •-` '' ' 1 i_i . . . `,,,,&2\---:---i, • \ 'RP • , ICIVM • , ;. P vwgi T-------4--\r----- , \ 2 te .\ '--I . \ ::1,1 ' . 1 ', •,_ _ zw,...,... _---- MIIIIBil=llii h ._._, .. ..9,,,, x 11.17 . MI 7.,..... y 1111111111111-! 7 .,\, al . • - \ * .- s -'i 1, SL- • . . • 1 , 1111 II 11,1 ..., 41.n.in•alw, Eir \ •{1,-1.1,014.._ - 1 Acc'121,Nd- -- 1\ \ - 7.--...\ • • ........ . fliVIP/Pr 1 I lik 0 4 ; *7 ..„,dir 1-4- ' trl'XI-*I \ • I IfeMida--• 7 / 1 A i+_ Ai ; lir: ii•fti_ -® - 4 .a. ---: \"111111111111114 411 •ji,, . .41.1\\ „,...._ \ J.._•,ig • , • . .gr . \,..w. .. • . ... _ .,.. • 1 / . .• I.,,W 1.% 11, .4, / ... 154 Vdi 441 -3. 4•4 1K 1K {14 sii K gilt ,g4 LES 1 4 0 •314 -7;,,/, 97•4•G K1 3„Pc,9Z''.. .6.9.11,,7 1. '-'1Z- - I-L-XVI s 3 _ . . 1. ___ 37adlgT21• .- J.14,fT-1.20.t . ' I rr . . • C. . --_ ... • - - s L 1 \ • • afa e . { \ S 'I}'Y6N'?p1LMdI - _...K.A.1AWKT- '�°' w/,:-olte�F1NT � • as ..+e7-tio 26 Je'� • - 'T ar___ RT • -II.' `sw 'ot so sH• 1* _s so a sot fa so -aw "JGtD �.�'r. ?Ik rg 00• •• 1111414„i61G5'� 1111111U1f:;� WiegO oCa i�1011I11111111M4?414vo9.111111111` ,r �A ie QlW q�!• r TG w"`„',l \• \ •.w � I?>�/,+o.0,1nb•� � '� —• 1 • j'Icy � ';; _ i:l °wsa�Ii/ j�•0� 00.. / ttl.-t �'=-fit �f :`.. �.� .: .: . / •a -i '• IiI 71 .�` r .—I ��►_�., �. k 1 dal �� : : : '• iii _ 1; o pq I ,: 0�11 �.�r r\ 4...\ _ .�.„R„aik i•. uu :_ _ IIIIli4: �• p ir;., ®`'� eaolfig • i ::N:.� 1 .A'_„frnnnY:f, .. rMoonlit:1 nuli'sit 'li!i f,• i�► !��• ��• �'� 11 f:%.� , f mat T,„ \ ,,.. :„ \,,,,,,, ,� irk.-.' �L � QW�III ��tiwl � sin�u,n��r �� -�, - i1l�illllp�� A,...,t, L'•� ��- "^'�'�►'��. I1•�� (n}none" �: ��/ 44lll' m1.lh 'II nn: Pr l�=l \ 'T'1:.� .." 'I zv.1 L \ a ate. '4_ .,'• II �°. •'d1a• I6 \ .I .; w�,4 4 s �' �q' l0 ikilit1:4 111 ,;k4.�.,. , 1 , lai —1 Ni �'' 111 .. \ .\ :I`. a tat , 9-' : 1 Iltb4, illiroki").:.•*-.` 1. 1.1111111Altil 'M ,1 alio VII0 . AY INN .,..___..„).. .-•-..,,- ''7.•,....m. O.�.04/11I I �� G.r'iy Ildli of_ i 1�BQZ� OlT � MA sI]li C ►-.: EOI r.�:c.w� I III IIIRv�.a�.�p17III IIIIIIIIpIG��+�:r;-i:: ��.OnAa 1�. nl. uauiil rolii iil; rn O.A� .b 1`,©4�It + A6]w / _ oo • vea as'se'e ;lLi7�ZL 1ro(o ."•;4"MM , V RfHAii . Trw.,La1r044 - 1 LANID)ggA fIE91 [JL�_ ► -- - :-,=�=d `E - rI-41'rfff-DUI—E alIz� I earvex.:/ z�{. . L.9VDOEnPRor'I -NIJPIYER.•./ WLGN.. dfB co1'NEX-1..GAPE7 SY• FO1+-Y � 0 wu xnbs 11 tavob WON,. Ste. 5 W> 1HWJiI.L4{, ,,,,.. ...LU6T / IIIIIIIIIIIi 5 G4L. HoRTH • • ��}�p�VGnpcol'1 IL•-76• 1, .. \t�,_ PLAIy VIGW . 0 MMus v.rali SfELIA•PUNHIvq...1 I •[PL Dig ; M.T. .• `, Nnur-iry US PU /MING cHMICY >i7 —SS % i PR1J(YIS LERfsIPCFA l4lFOR1RPUl0•Ja� I 't4I.. q10 ��y�• �nq� Tp� 1 ,�� S 3 I (RIRp1,E-LYAPC� }U1M -1XOR-it�/ Z rwnus f£FHILATA �JiIROTCY/ I rsy.d8 �� 1 w ~ iti ,mow = 1 o �' PE c"'"ALs a w ,, MT.Y2-�I I'LaEr1nIG C116RRY �;��w O to onuoc wiRc •+ CITY 04 RENTOPJ FO err Cltsl.K,.H Foev 3 ca,.vie. •• ru A{q-to(y s1G4 m inp n�n; ee o o Out-To, xe �. •r. . ipl : liwr. �' . < AMA I.ICTHT , 4 P1 411111-G Or TO - • V W CORPUS MGTTAU.n/ I 'CAL. .aiow rtoor r.-. Tion. PALING eae wew FSP�R7TeU i MP/TUC/SUI/ -n(o HT N'IE''IYFV1.'•WEl:PM,tlFT-01-1WJIGsI 15 MEGIuM i ' • C�ueedAs PM eg'3E p�prnnaouuo 4rRuPsi. TREE STAKING DETAIL a nrius rocou/ - e.:; HT IW- PINE `� U L:.;:•• :;. i 1.5i�.: .+-. I Ifi T i s HL" tS-111Tl-(•A•/ - B'-o HT �� .(S a WESiERJt I1G•11LLK ,6l • BD cgc JpirmLUI'I aNr7nIWH/ IV at.lst1 . (J' KATs-FA"Rsc ' a • OOO TPSX 'P/PSTIGV,TI�/ Q.4. -irttol•'.Z� - I - _ - • �p�,�AratoRNIV.E RWA • 000 �m,ctev( ZGa.. • . • N ?NOVA y 5 GAL. -• • • RICHARD WARD ASSOCIATES w T4T�cioH w 1...w...n. ..,-w•.ea.... 12111ula 51c.PI..•e1.q l•M`S,aKl.iCxll[C IyTo1,o[V rind t GAL.. • u.t...•0..10,. WWII,• 1/44 - __. _ _ _ _- - sow Eric Nana c.. 1-OR-^ITF/U. RIIDRI•RDN./ • h au.. .. _ _ - Seeceb. WPek�B.m 9B1t2 weig _ 1 a>._ ys� .E4 _3. __••.•l .•1T.d Q{.d 1�M• .d�G.}W ki.. .}�u . d iAS -. . • 1 WW� `:fib I .1 1 MYA _ 15i "-Lam' .-L .'. • _bthailm t_ ) a_PLEX--- - ---- - '. -.-- - - ---=EUIGDIA—.®-G ILEX-----: - -- _-6uILP ©. A-Pt•eX - -. - - — 5 • _ -B - -_51TE `5E-tTIOfJ_ i( = rip.SLOTH W,Low4>L -.--S..atJ'.L td-d'' • _ txav ... _Via- - .- _ =I fit-_3 Z l''''. *ffifil -°----"-- —IWM ------] 1'.:'7'- 64■■ ..=_i....= -Amor-- =�_ Inn! p —, 4: -fib _ _—::::—' s-_ , .■ a-unl—I -.. _ gtn°c, , ■ t- �J ... -r �_ Ll-4 ' -- ______—=r--==y'- _`_�_____-----ter---- ---===—�7=1- __ ' 'WFS'I ELt:OFT�aF��17�L-VA -- q —�=�--f-,e..er-��t/g7�ata-.HJECAwC�-a---------- I --- -- '�" —FloliTl-fY-IZ7AT�U:1 Etlllv�l.JLj a - I. s.+. %y'-I'-d `e O =TwZ2-J'e l:d!___. - It =�tD. E�•IId _----'- \D_ - •o a __fL. —_ —�lticAt- Il -n.�,y. •� • b CITY OF ilENTON - - • yo3 . �r- a \• , • _5 ess , ( ff ( 1?!T' F wry -,u ® �% m 'r I n ( D O. Lul _-.y 7M�M I�NE••sod ID I. - DuiLvit. -O-T�x -- -G.-P4YX---- - • Cu,WIuor O _ { • • CV 1 --- 'Mufti UM1.P,1y '^'NL,''7�-'" _ .. . _ • C-3 E 2- a'© -` L..` I / /---PMY AP-F-n PPANTY LINE- I 1_ Plzx 7 1 .o _E:26.4:03 •, . 1 \ pn/f I 51D l fi= uuwupu ( I Ni+��^^^ I . • ()DATUM NNE 'tor 1- i 5 ITr- SE-OrI0I.1 Ill,"jL-dl 1?L. - 64+,t.✓' R.-3 2c4-Ir: I%`Z z.9?JC PeoPsio-TY UNrb J l . 1-- _ i�56TFl-14 NNFh-----4 PARw+N GfCD 1 } 1'yme-j ( PLPLAN"(Age.A I 1 1 L t I I 1 I ,\ / I if.-2_r UN `� �/ I - - t — I 1 I . r- I R / f�Y DV - I / ENS I I �9 �6:% �as . @ N 0 ‘8 : R (i) pYl , *1•3 OCT211986 I I BUILDING/ZONING DEPT, li e e I Se .., 4- 0 1-[ r-ITP6tE. V I I-LAGiE A1-,--r iYs I•I✓, = 41 .ro71 {.. 3 z-64-ay {i'Z 2ok1E f wp TM 1H ? SCALE:I III�OIQQO��II APPROVED BY: DRAWN BY we, FP\19-TIAL I'LOT I'Li\K_i I=?A-� DATE:I�-1Y7�W REVISED 117�1(/ ii I II- I z. vbrz p bL k_t - 5 OK-I FEVISEp LocA"lahl r0Z 6UILI71NC1 Co DRAWING B ER �vl Dp--,t _/ `,\I-t I� /I-1 r Y � 17 X 22 PRINTED ON NO.1000N CLEARPRINT• G3 z-HaE-< > "1-NE I f V{M wCY{ er ^_,„./`+� ,....3412. ,•,...al / i PINYM-A-----".r-1�-- P¢o lY tul6 ;57 4 Pi-ex I 1, tad554 -� 4aer tuszp,,,,c, AReA ofwr . RTIIIA 14.1,1E 3oL:-L____. 51Tr- 5EGT101.1 i'..ad-dl P:l.... 54+.1.4. R-3 24le C-2 2o1JG PetiE V 1.NE3-- J \ -- litJ — — I- -- -- — . i�SEf t-NNesi�_ TA�L'INL7 \ 12 44-, 1 PlAY Alen 11 I I 1 I— l / I/{ -26rNUNII / I �j CITY Or Rimp�T O FJ-tfYY DFIvF I \ _ / E , I i • OCT 21 1916 I • BUILDINGIQNINQ DEPT, P�r,e� I O 15 4.APsj //iiIllp 1 .: --1 .7-J--- —— --4______ _____I. I-I„ITPGTE VIt L,& 76\PAP,TME1,--Ts . P L."499.to71 12,9 LOkIt- -2 7--c1-1E v--IltOfeflY uNvi u.c:l �p'' ,va.ovcn or. a...e DGL - I'AN,TIAL- PLOT I'LAKI In=zd-o' o.*.:o-re-6r a� Iwlb-et, Fati6CD 1-ocwrioN FOR. IWI DINlq!a I' I C� PL.Or f'LAf�l -SF,LTIDN WV i D 1 11-L RP,GNr(UT°•f f — S;4- I l() Vo Lek IRA) AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION NOTJCE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL AudreyDeJoie REVIEW COMMITTEE , being first duly sworn on oath states that I3NTON, WASHINGTON he/she is the Chief Clerk of the The Erlyironmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a declaration of NON- SIGNIFICANCE for the following project: ECF-091-86 VALLEY NEWSPAPERS SA-110-86 ' BENNETT GROUP, INC. (HERITAGE Daily News Journal, Daily Record Chronicle, Daily Globe News VILLAGE APARTMENTS).Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of 30 multi family units on 1.85 acres of Daily newspapers published six (6)times a week.That said newspapers property zoned R-2 & R-3. Property lo- are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six cated at 1626 Grant Avenue S. monthsprior to the date ofpublication referred to,printed andpublished Further information the on regarding this action ,.is available in th Building and Zoning in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King Department, Municipal Building, Renton, County, Washington. Valley Newspapers have been approved as legal Washington, us ERC action must be file be f ile Any peal of d with the Renton newspapers by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for Hearing Examiner by December 8, 1986. King County. Published in the Valley Daily News Nov. 24, 1986. R1953 The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Daily News Journal , Daily Record Chronicle X , Daily Globe News , (and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice a Notice of Environmental Determination waspublished on November 24, 1986 R1953 The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of$ 16•34 . Subscribed and sworn to before me this 28th day of Nov 19 86 e. Not blic for the State of Washington, CITY GF RENTON residing at Federal Way, p P-, W1 King County, Washington. Ju D VN#87 Revised 10/84 DEC 81996 BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. 3437Z l �'�� 7 L. • ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE SITE PLAN REVIEW FEBRUARY 3, 1987 PROJECT: Heritage Village Apartments PROPONENT: Bennett Group, Inc. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of 30 multi-family units on 1.85 acres of property zoned R-2 and R-3. FILE NUMBER: SA-110-86 ISSUES: 1. Whether the site plan is efficiently laid out in terms of use, vehicular circulation, pedestrian circulation, and common open space? 2. Whether the site plan makes sense in terms of its relationship to future development to the north or south in terms of pedestrian and vehicular linkages? 3. Whether the bulk and scale of the development is compatible with the surrounding area? and 4. Whether sufficient landscaping and pedestrian amenities have been provided on site? ANALYSIS: The subject proposal does not conform with the Comprehensive Plan which designates this area as Greenbelt and Single-family. The subject proposal does conform with the R-2 and R-3 zoning for this area which allows multi-family housing. The R-2 piece to the east allows duplexes only whereas the R-3 piece allows multi-family at 25 DU/AC. The site will be buffered with landscaping (8 feet high) between itself and the properties to the north, east and south. The site has been organized with a vehicular spine that runs east-west and which is oriented visually on to the common open area and landscape buffer on the hillier portion of the site to east where it abuts a single-family devlopment. Parking areas are laid out in a perpendicular fashion to this spine thereby reducing the likelihood of cars manuevering in and out of spaces blocking overall vehicular circulation Pedestrian circulation runs parallel to this spine and links up to the play- space focal point on the hill at the east end of the site. As a consequence, most pedestrian circulation is relatively independent of the parking areas, only crossing them at their entrances. The units are clusterred into smaller buildings housing four to six units each. These in turn are sites parallel to the vehicular/pedestrian spine on the R-3 portion of the site and consequently are spaced at least forty feet (40' ) apart. Those in the R-2 zone at the east end of the site are sited perpendicular to each other and are approximately forty feet (40' ) apart also. As a consequence, Staff believe the siting provides adequate light and air circulation for all units. The siting of the buildings on the site in conjunction with existing landscaping should adequately block out most noise eminating from the site. The Hearing Examiner's condition limiting the of size and height of any building within 250 feet of the east property line to a height of 35 feet above existing ground elevation and a maximum footprint of 4,000 sq. ft. also mitigates harmful effects on nearby properties. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW CI TTEE _ SITE PLAN REVIEW FEBRUARY 3, 1987 PAGE 2 FINDINGS: 1. The subject proposal minimizes undesirable impacts on surrounding properties as a consequence of its site layout and landscaping. 2. The bulk and height of buildings are consistent with or more restrictive than what the zoning allows. 3. Although transitions have been provided for development within the site, without knowing more about eventual development to the north or south it is difficult to determine what types of linkages should be developed to these undeveloped properties. As currently laid out, it would appear that pedestrian linkages would have to occur through the existing parking areas. Likewise, vehicular circulation would have to be through these same areas. 4. The restrictions imposed by the Hearing Examiner at the time of rezoning limiting building heights and total density on the site to 30 DUs should ensure reasonable compatibility with surrounding areas. The 30 foot height limit at the east end of the site would appear to address the view impaction concerns of the property owner to the east. Likewise, the landscape buffer at the east end of the site should address concerns about noise from structures and the recreation area. DECISION: Based upon the above, Staff conclude that this project complies with the criteria for site plan approval. We would recommend the following conditions of approval for this site: 1. That a pedestrian linkage be provided between the southern building at the east end of the site and the east-west pedestrian spine; 2. That security devices, including exterior key only deadlocks, be provided at the entrances of all dwelling units as well as on all windows and sliding doors; 3. That automatic sprinkler systems be installed in buildings #2, 3, 5, and 6 in lieu of secondary access; 4. That sidewalks be treated with a decorative finish and pedestrian scaled lighting be provided along its length; and 5. That benches be provided near the mailboxes. TRANSMITTED THIS 6th day of February, 1987 to the parties of record; Todd Bennett Bennett Group, Inc. 5729 Lake View Drive Kirkland, WA 98033 TRANSMITTED THIS 6th day of February, 1987 to the following: Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch Richard Houghton, Public Works Director Larry M. Spring, Policy Development Director Ronald Nelson, Building and Zoning Director Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Members, Renton Planning Commission Glen Gordon, Fire Marshal Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Renton Record Chronicle ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW C :TTEE SITE PLAN REVIEW -'FEBRUARY 3, 1987 PAGE 3 REQUESTS FOR RECONSIDERATION must be filed in writing on or before 5 p.m. on Wednesday, September 10, 1986. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Site Plan Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available prior to the meeting date of August 20, 1986 may make a written request to the Zoning Administrator for review by the Site Plan Committee within fourteen (14) days of the decision, which is Wednesday, August 27, 1986. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Committee may, after review of the record, take further action as it deems proper. AN APPEAL TO THE HEARING EXAMINER is governed by Title IV, Section 3011(B)(1), which requires that such appeals be filed directly with the Hearing Examiner. Appeals must be made in writing before 5 p.m. on Wednesday, September 10, 1986. THE APPEARANCE OF FAIRNESS DOCTRINE provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process for site plan approvals include: (1) the Public Works Director, (2) the Building and Zoning Director, (3) the Policy Development Director, (4) the Hearing Examiner, and (5) members of the City Council. All communications after the decision date must be made in writing through the Zoning Administrator. All communications are public record and this permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence in writing. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial Committee decision, but to all Request for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the Hearing Examiner. 1 REN1, BUILDING & ZONING DEP�,�< !NENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET R_v150O10 ECF - 091 - 86 APPLICATION NO(S) : SrmE PLAN APPROVAL- SA-110- 16 PROPONENT : BENNETT GROUP, INC. PROJECT TITLE : HERITAGE VILLAGE APARTMENTS BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF 30 MULTI FAMILY UNITS ON 1.85 ACRES OF PROPERTY ZONED R-2 AND R-3 . LOCATION : 1.626 GRANT AVENUE SOUTH TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 11-12-86 0 ENGINEERING DIVISION E] TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU EiiPARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT OPOLICE DEPARTMENT OPOLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P ,M, ON NOV. 6th, 1986 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : BAN IN\i . XPPROVED OAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED '' .E.viscr L,NvoscipioG Is hcaPikate is0)•)(0 PIkopEirri L.-Nit. T-• Lvvi Of DATE: SIGNATURE OF DIRECTO AUTHORIZED R 1 .--.27- 81-.2.\i'k C 0 R AUTHOR ZE EPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 RENT"'. BUILDING & ZONING DEPt-�1+VENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Ruiioi3 ECF - 091 - 86 APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE PLAN APPROVAT.- SA-1ln-se PROPONENT : BENNETT GROUP , INC. PROJECT TITLE : HERITAGE VILLAGE APARTMENTS BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF 30 MULTI FAMILY UNITS ON 1. 85 ACRES OF PROPERTY ZONED R-2 AND R-3 . LOCATION : 1626 GRANT AVENUE SOUTH TO : PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 11-12-86 OENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG, DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE :, DUTILITIES ENG , DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU 0,2 PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT OBUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT OPOLICE DEPARTMENT OPOLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OOTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :00 P .M, ON NOV. 6th, 1986 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : PO-F k S OAPPROVED ® APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED '� vc�J f a toff C 1 Qdafre;&d /MI Me"y Jff&es. `eVia/4/0 cone.&.r aPe a.I /'//oaf.' if Mere l// /40i 4- o/ the ,a/e'e`o e-h IL av Ay/T or `0A, c -g e 7 (dh cre re /j Me ire/C�ree( di'/ed-i.e/ de- o.e t i // e ,� `i//�//. e t,t& /Gre fi dca.a/ _r 7i /he wjj 7 .e, 'a_ /4e aoA,// //? a ' /he arx,,e t Y1 aid P�1(1 hJ /a h 7) Can /he /11li/6a P) al /tie 'w P*I d� c � ilia,,,iee4 f 6 e 1�/)e i;t', ,A e e ? � 7/i9 �� / SIGNA ' .,;1' DATE: /OF IRECT R OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE ean e /�fU/-! `J0JL e') del o'Q 14e we.lTe REVISION 5/1982 rNe �✓G/e. a td Form 182 r\ 2 1' ■ TEROFFICE ME ' TO: • FILE DATE: JANUARY 28, 1987 FROM: JERRY LIND , SUBJECT: HERITA( E VILLAGE APARTMENTS 1626 Grant Avenue South File: SA-110-86 I spoke to Reed Cahill , architect for the above referenced project today. We had a discussion regarding the pedestrian walkways around the apartments on what type of materials are proposed. The parking lot will be of asphalt. The walkways will be made of concrete. He is unsure of the actual surface though. It will likely be either broomed finish concrete or aggregate. '-IRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SK- - REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: POLAC\-1 �-ED U,E-C-C-YR\r\ DATE CIRCULATED: OCT. 28th, 1986 COMMENTS DUE: NOV. 6th, 1986 ECF OF RENTON - ngi - 86 APPLICATION NO(s). SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-110-86 flf l 2 8 1988 PROPONENT: BENNETT GROUP, INC. POLICY DEVELOPMENT nEFe* PROJECT TITLE: HERITAGE VILLAGE APARTMENTS BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF 30 ' 1ULTI FAMILY UNITS ON 1.85 ACRES OF PROPERTY ZONED R-2 & R-3. LOCATION: 1626 GRANT AVENUE SOUTH. SITE AREA: 1.85 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 1/61 4) Plants !� 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation ) 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities k_-2 COMMENTS: () * Qa.64e ffrL°7442S . &,)4,0, , - /, ? .- ',40. ---,/x( 7 / _07.,iit , t . -(> rti -44°-6 /‘...,?,...64 i.,i.,;fil ,,,,,,,,* d,__ , ' Pe---4-;-j 42/7_t_.,...4e,e.,,,i? E') ,.--1 -41;::::-St -iee4r„oa ;4'64 e-i-tt..,--416. /4_&..1 ? nte_be ce.”.... L.„4,, —G(),ew DAIS 5,,ie.d4- 5,,._,,4 ,,,,i,,,:, s6-6(,, RECOMMENDATION: DNS 0 MITIGATED DNS n EIS REVIEWED BY: 674re !/i15 TITLE: 74,SS/47L/L`'!er DATE: 41/,14;i/g‘\\\\ FORM #14 REVISED 9/10/85 RENT' BUILDING & ZONING DEPA?- 'WENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 091 - 86 CITY OF RENTON APPLICATION NO(S) : STTE PLAN APPRCW T.• SA-11 Q-s6 geT 2_8 ass PROPONENT: BENNETT GROUP', INC. OLICY nN91n1'ME T r.r.pr. PROJECT TITLE : HERITAGE VILLAGE APARTMENTS BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF 30 MULTI FAMILY UNITS ON 1. 85' ACRES OF PROPERTY ZONED AND R- LOCATION : 1626 GRANT AVENUE SOUTH TO: 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 11-12-86 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU OPARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT OBUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT OPOLICE DEPARTMENT FOPOLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON NOV. 6th, 1986' • REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 1 /Cr EFA-F /ED ❑ APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS El NOT APPROVED Vie. er. ;, CP (X• L- 71 r� DATE: ///? S6 SIG ATURE OF DIREG*O OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 IRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SH • REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Z)W DATE CIRCULATED: OCT. 28th, 1986 COMMENTS DUE: NOV. 6th, 1986 ECF - 091 - 86 APPLICATION NO(s). SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-110-86 PROPONENT: BENNETT GROUP, INC. PROJECT TITLE: HERITAGE VILLAGE APARTMENTS BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF 30 MULTI FAMILY UNITS ON 1.85 ACRES OF PROPERTY ZONED R-2 & R-3. • LOCATION: 1626 GRANT AVENUE SOUTH. SITE AREA: 1.85 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air P/ 3) Water t� 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing f ' 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation — 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation P� 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: 10527 RECOMMENDATION: DNS D MITIGATED DNS n EIS REVIEWED BY: C - � 57 TITLE: DATE: • FORM #14 REVISED 9/10/85 RENT( BUILDING & ZONING DEPA"111ENT' r•. DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 091 - 86 APPLICATION NO(S) : STTF PLAN APPBlVAI.• SA-1 10-8LA PROPONENT: BENNETT GROUP, INC. PROJECT TITLE : HERITAGE VILLAGE APARTMENTS BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF 30 MULTI FAMILY UNITS ON 1. 85 ACRES OF PROPERTY ZONED R-2 AND R-3 . LOCATION : 1626 GRANT AVENUE SOUTH TO: ® PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 11-12-86 0 ENGINEERING DIVISION EITRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 121 UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION [=1 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT D 'BUILDING .& ZONING DEPARTMENT LII POLICE DEPARTMENT El POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT LII OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P ,M, ON NOV. 6th, 1986 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : `ryaP,�c 33 APPROVED El APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ❑ NOT APPROVED 7) \A u Li_3 fo b ey 3 0 10/, U e tolge6 Cz � DATE: 1//.2/5 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OP AUTHORIZED R PRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 ARONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SY`^ REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: RUl ( L CD DATE CIRCULATED: OCT. 28th, 1986 COMMENTS DUE: NOV. 6th, 1986 ECF - oqi R6 APPLICATION NO(s). SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-110-86 PROPONENT: BENNETT GROUP, INC. PROJECT TITLE: HERITAGE VILLAGE APARTMENTS BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF 30 MULTI FAMILY UNITS ON 1.85 ACRES OF PROPERTY ZONED R-2 & R-3. • LOCATION: 1626 GRANT AVENUE SOUTH. SITE AREA: 1.85 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Eaith 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: RECOMMENDATION: 1 DNS / E MITIGATED DNS EIS r REVIEWED BY: - ( / : TITLE: , ` ,r �--�- FORM #14 REVISED 9/10/85, RENT' BUILDING & ZONING DEPA'IAENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 091 - 86 APPLICATION NO(S) : STTF PLAN APPRC\1AT • SA-110-86 PROPONENT: BENNETT GROUP, INC. PROJECT TITLE: HERITAGE VILLAGE APARTMENTS BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF 30 MULTI FAMILY UNITS ON 1. 85 ACRES OF PROPERTY ZONED £ -2 AND R-3 . - - LOCATION : 1626 GRANT AVENUE SOUTH 10: 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 11-12-86 ❑ ENGINEERING DIVISION 1: TRAFFIC ENG, DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG, DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU ® PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT EVUILDING & 70W1N6 DEPARTMENT ® POLICE DEPARTMENT 1=1 POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT I:=1 OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING, PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :00 P .M, ON NOV. 6th, 1986 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : r C_24 . [APPROVED ❑ APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS LI NOT APPROVED �%� C� DATE: /,� r' ! 3b SIGNATU RECTOR OR AU- "RIZED REPRES -IVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 JIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 110I6_ DATE CIRCULATED: OCT. 28th, 1986 COMMENTS DUE: NOV. 6th, 1986 ECF - 091 - £16 APPLICATION NO(s). SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-110-86 PROPONENT: BENNETT GROUP, INC. PROJECT TITLE: HERITAGE VILLAGE APARTMENTS BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF 30 MULTI FAMILY UNITS ON 1.85 ACRES OF PROPERTY ZONED R-2 & R-3. LOCATION: 1626 GRANT AVENUE SOUTH. SITE AREA: 1.85 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water i/s;5E. 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing , 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation , 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: RECOMMENDATION: .tC. DNS Q MITIGATED DNS n EIS REVIEWED BY: )e-A-A-ArAT----(-A.;nd > TITLE: DATE: /1/ /9 FORM #14 REVISED 9/10/85 RENT( BUILDING & ZONING DEPA'AENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 091 - 86 APPLICATION NO(S) : STTE PLAN APPROVAT, • SA-11f1-F6 PROPONENT: BENNETT GROUP', INC. PROJECT TITLE : HERITAGE VILLAGE APARTMENTS BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF 30 MULTI FAMILY UNITS ON 1. 85 ACRES OF PROPERTY ZONED 11-2 AND R-3 . LOCATION : 1626 GRANT AVENUE SOUTH TO: ® PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 11-12-86 OENGINEERING DIVISION ® TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : OUTILITIES ENG . DIVISION ® FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU [' PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT laBtrIEDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT OPOLICE DEPARTMENT E POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT [' OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P .M. ON NOV. 6th, 1986 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 17_XWIA)(0, l APPROVED OAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED boo 6 ieu .Cjj `I p_ S ?Ropoaiio f orao ePtyieftio pRoNit ( 1surwR, V 1 ocizrzNa 5 & TO 3/1-- Guna DATE: /I" #7'66o? aIGNATURE OF DIRECIR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE IL \ REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 JIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SE a :REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 'Pb L'�G ; OIEETers DATE CIRCULATED: OCT. 28th, 1986 COMMENTS DUE: NOV. 6th, 1986 ECF - 091 - R6 APPLICATION NO(s). SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-110-86 PROPONENT: BENNETT GROUP, INC. PROJECT TITLE: HERITAGE VILLAGE APARTMENTS BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF 30 MULTI FAMILY UNITS ON 1.85 ACRES OF PROPERTY ZONED R-2 & R-3. LOCATION: 1626 GRANT AVENUE SOUTH. SITE AREA: 1.85 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: / -Jo-J /fr c_. 61, Cam- �7 4 Gam. 077 G` RECOMMENDATION: DNS MITIGATED DNS Q EIS REVIEWED BY: L2 TITLE: //./I may✓ DATE: �J`�% ✓OU FORM #14 REVISED 9/10/85 RENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPA'NENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF — 091 - 86 APPLICATION NO S) : SITE PLAN APPRfVAT,• SA-1 1 Q-8j PROPONENT : BENNETT GROUP , INC. PROJECT TITLE : HERITAGE VILLAGE APARTMENTS BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF 30 MULTI FAMILY UNITS ON 1. 85 ACRES OF PROPERTY ZONED 7 2 AND R-3 . LOCATION : 1626 GRANT AVENUE SOUTH TO : [1] PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 11-12-86 El ENGINEERING DIVISION ® TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION ® FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU ® PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT El POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Dm-HERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P .M. ON NOV. 6th, 1986 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : �� O APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS n NOT APPROVED e0t4- =(./z2/ rpe525 -e.gr- DATE: �� - SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUT°' IZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 / . IRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SH REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: eN-:)( I K)(1-±,14 1 43(1-7, :M\j DATE CIRCULATED: OCT. 28th, 1986 COMMENTS DUE: NOV. 6th, 1986 ECF - 091 - 86 APPLICATION NO(s). SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-110-86 PROPONENT: BENNETT GROUP, INC. PROJECT TITLE: HERITAGE VILLAGE APARTMENTS BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF 30 MULTI FAMILY UNITS ON 1.85 ACRES OF PROPERTY ZONED R-2 & R-3. LOCATION: 1626 GRANT AVENUE SOUTH. SITE AREA: 1.85 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACCT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air (/ 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals L 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health . 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare /// 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: 41k!!!!5! RECOMMENDATION: Vp<1 DNS ® MITIGATED DNS Q EIS REVIEWED BY: 7:7 TITLE: /(/ ‘Zr FORM #14 REVISED 9/10/85 RENTem BUILDING & ZONING DEPAQ511AENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 091 - 86 APPLICATION NO(S) : STTF PLAN APPBwAT, • SA-1] C1-86 PROPONENT: BENNETT GROUP, INC. PROJECT TITLE : HERITAGE VILLAGE APARTMENTS BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF 30 MULTI FAMILY UNITS ON 1. 85 ACRES OF PROPERTY ZONED R-2 AND R-3 . LOCATION : 1626 GRANT AVENUE SOUTH TO: OPUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 11-12-86 0003 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : IIUTILITIES ENG . DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU • PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT ® BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT • POLICE DEPARTMENT • POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE .COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON NOV. 6th, 1986 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : ` El APPROVED U APPROVED W CONDITIONS EINOT APPROVED cry (I ZS y� y -4 Zz 3 "��J //4i� �... DATE: SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR JHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 - 1IRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SI" REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: �� P ICE 0 "�A"�,_„ DATE CIRCULATED: OCT. 28th, 1986 COMMENTS DUE: � INP -C 81-0) ECF - 091 - £i6 APPLICATION NO(s). SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-110-86 PROPONENT: BENNETT GROUP, INC. o°' ) � :a g PROJECT TITLE: HERITAGE VILLAGE APARTMENTS a^cu BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF 30 MULTI FAMILY UNITS ON 1.85 ACRES OF PROPERTY ZONED R-2 & R-3. LOCATION: 1626 GRANT AVENUE SOUTH. SITE AREA: 1.85 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: RECOMMENDATION: Fr---DNS a MITIGATED DNS n EIS REVIEWED BY: TITLE: -fc. . . DATE: 00 '19� l 9 4 FORM #14 REVISED 9/10/85 ,-/. RENTP",,BUILDING & ZONING DEPA--MENT r ,,, DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 091• - , 86 APPLICATION NO(S) : STPF: PLAN APPROVAL. sA-110-,act PROPONENT : BENNETT GROUP, INC. PROJECT TITLE : HERITAGE VILLAGE APARTMENTS BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF 30 MULTI FAMILY UNITS ON 1. 85 ACRES OF PROPERTY ZONED A-2 AND R-3 . LOCATION : 1626 GRANT AVENUE SOUTH To: OPUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 11-12-86 EIENGINEERING DIVISION OTRAFFIC ENG, DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : OUTILITIES ENG , DIVISION 4:TFIRE PREVENTION BUREAU DPARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT D .BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT OPOLICE DEPARTMENT OPOLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON NOV. 6th, 1986' REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : OAPPROVED ETAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED () 61-6 :-: a,3, s vii -6 - 7 ,0- ,-., 4€....- _.0./.,A-e.-e....., - ".,`°- (00 4Io ram.. . .. ,.& .. .. (1) a. . wi.ir -e<zc,_ c, . >-)4-- -6 .1..... Ltz. o +6--0-42-‘2.~_e0-7.4-1-;' r......i ..w-mow- 3 00 ile;,9 cl"...G444441, 12"-al'' � �i` DATEC ✓'_�� c 9 /9 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTO IR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE \\ \ REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 It' : = °' •IRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW 4110 '4 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: C'Pru..s DATE CIRCULATED: OCT. 28th, 1986 COMMENTS DUE: NOV. 6th, 1986 ECF - 091 - 86 APPLICATION NO(s). SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-110-86 PROPONENT: BENNETT GROUP, INC. PROJECT TITLE: HERITAGE VILLAGE APARTMENTS BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF 30 MULTI FAMILY UNITS ON 1.85 ACRES OF PROPERTY ZONED R-2 & R-3. LOCATION: 1626 GRANT AVENUE SOUTH. SITE AREA: 1.85 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics x 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation , 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: •• / Cs/hSSi e,1 L df(1%/e.h ff i 1 /o f rar7r/ c fems 14- 76 !070Zi?Wor of1 1--A S f�hc-e f i qhi KiCV 0/74 fy,ee fe 4 O He eGic/ fhe //-e o, ec iAr4 '1 h it ' Ae ram e veil t, a0. e bAne�74 /if i7a74 /Wile2 el c c/l i 474 i`4 e fi,�oiec.7 �:e. 'f /o«fed cf7L /hc. toeIfr-e e toad e'I d' /tie 21 /c9 c/ e2 q' h1'74.r /, 6/i S` .mod P2 �h� f'BGfZ°lG�l PK� �i�Gl RECOMMENDATION: El DNS ED MITIGATED DNS n EIS REVIEWED BY: (/c.%f ,&4,1' 'Z-f TITLE: `(1ci CGd'd`alle 4 DATE: 467(6 FORM #14 REVISED 9/10/85 v r,„ RENO BUILDING & ZONING DEP(SMENT ,p DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 091 - 86 APPLICATION NO(S) : STTE LAN APPROVAL- sA-l1n-S PROPONENT: BENNETT GROUP, INC. PROJECT TITLE : HERITAGE VILLAGE APARTMENTS B3RIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF 30 MULTI FAMILY UNITS ON 1 . 85 ACRES OF PROPERTY ZONED "t=2 AND R-3 . LOCATION ; 1626 GRANT AVENUE SOUTH TO: El PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 11-12-86 0 ENGINEERING DIVISION 0 TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE,; 0 UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION ® FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT ® POLICE DEPARTMENT El POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 0 OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON NOV. 6th, 1986 . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; Park S DAPPROVED 1APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED TLe pi au, vneL s -it) 6 re Clawt.ck C +erw• s vi how .I4,e v1e1 . Sp4A.e cwh,(-+-ro4i_j I k rel.(,�-i t t' -hi eta +4 e- 4-4,wt4 Ctfiva tO Ifl 0 LA) 1146.14e. UM.0-e Put c,-I-r o,..a:( (Ia. wa,ore c.)14 r-h r 64ChL' A' ip tie- _ 1,-LA-01. co `r o dd-S G a .- w ow# -f-0w a#-d ilk,-E-p y ru,� vt,s f--1k.Li pro(6,L4- c!ti-1-0 1.,.. ip ,�O L e r 6 etiA— CtAAAT)S u,,,,1 p e d,e t-Fk•i cut5 4-4r DATE; / .1.44/f //// ,/,( SIG U E OF DIRE TOR OR AU7 RIZED REPRESENTATIVE i\L '\ ,,-, ...� .... ,.. ,. ,. � . . .. REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 -)IRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW Si _ J REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: �� I �- I I 7b k DATE CIRCULATED: OCT. 28th, 1986 COMMENTS DUE: Nov. 6th, 1986 ECF - 091 - 86 APPLICATION NO(s). SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-110-86 PROPONENT: BENNETT GROUP, INC. PROJECT TITLE: HERITAGE VILLAGE APARTMENTS BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF 30 MULTI FAMILY UNITS ON 1.85 ACRES OF PROPERTY ZONED R-2 & R-3. LOCATION: 1626 GRANT AVENUE SOUTH. SITE AREA: 1.85 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: RECOMMENDATION: is DNS ED MITIGATED DNS n EIS • REVIEWED BY: ' TITLE: by,t-i4, oriit) DATE: /l 43 gge FORM #14 REVISED 9/10/85 RENT BUILDING & ZONING ®EPA'1NENT , DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 091 - 86 APPLICATION NO(S) : STTF PLAN APPROVAL- SA-110 26 PROPONENT: BENNETT GROUP, INC. PROJECT TITLE : HERITAGE VILLAGE APARTMENTS BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF 30 MULTI FAMILY UNITS ON 1. 85 ACRES OF PROPERTY ZONED Tt-2 AND R-3 . LOCATION : 1626 GRANT AVENUE SOUTH TO: ® PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 11-12-86 ® ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG, DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : iii} TILITIES ENG , DIVISION ® FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU n PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT l OBUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT OPOLICE DEPARTMENT OPOLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Eli OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P ,M, ON NOV. 6th, 1986 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Ri-14.5 , ri APPROVED Ej APPROVED WITH CIADITIONS IN NOT APPROVED LATAI IImmY APPROVAL SUBJECT TO _ Neos „✓,tree.. P LATE AGREEMENT-WATER = _NO a _. hl( � S1§✓6r - /�cs�! LATE MIENS AGREEMENT-SEXIER Lye) SYSTEM IEYELAPMENT CHARGE-WATER y,,5 /'ZS•vD iter ur//f X 3D11#l/71-s- = 0.6, ,DSO. m a SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-SEVER ,/a s ,z5°O qt k.c. .co.c eo SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA MFRCE-EATER �/D ! lD SDI 00 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA Cl:f:P -SE MT T �D —+ / APPROVED WATER PLAN )/ S a APPROVED SEWER PLAN APPROVED FIRE HYDRWi i.t.;r.;�ORS @Y FIRL .,� yrs ICP-; rrr, - nmssr *5 4‘.4,/ All (44DATE: /7A3 476 17777 OF DIRECTOR DR r JTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE IL REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 / . - 3325Z ,, NOTICE OF PENDING SITE PLAN APPROVAL RENTON, WASHINGTON A SITE PLAN APPLICATION HAS BEEN FILED AND ACCEPTED WITH THE BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT. THE FOLLOWING BRIEFLY DESCRIBES THE APPLICATION AND THE NECESSARY PUBLIC APPROVALS: DESCRIPTION: Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of 30 multi-family units on 1.185 acres of property zoned R-2 and R-3, File No. SA-110-86. GENERAL LOCATION: Located at 1626 Grant Avenue South. PUBLIC APPROVALS: 1. Site plan approval 2. Building permit The application can be reviewed at the Building and Zoning Department located on the third floor of City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to public hearings and during public hearings. For further information on the application or dates of final action by the City, please contact the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2540. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Building and Zoning Department. Ronald G. Nelson Building and Zoning Director CERTIFICATION I, JERRY F. LIND, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT FIVE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS WERE POSTED BY ME ON NOVEMBER 19, 1986, IN FIVE (5) CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON OR NEAR THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing inpu-gyp , on the day of . A, .S\ ' n_ gJ J MO TA +ai'© SIGNED: 3 m it G � ;a et i c : � o � o Z�J'rr..G. 8 19-7,0.(�,`.+0 'L'®...isvN • I • . • ENVIRONMENTAL • DEcLA :1, TioN APPLICATION NO. ECF-091-86 & SA-110-86 • • • APPLICANT BENNETT GROUP, INC. (HERITAGE •VILLAGE APARTMENTS) PROPOSED ACTION APPLICATION FOR. SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF..30 MULTI FAMILY UNITS ON 1.85 ACRES OF PROPERTY ZONED R-2 & R-3.. • GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS ' 1626 GRANT AVENUES. POSTED TO. NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS' OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (E.R..C.). HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION • DOES • ►M1 DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT • WILL WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. • • THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY DECEMBER 8, 1986 , AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE 'RENTON HEARING EXAMINER • BY 5:00 P.M., DECEMBER 8: 1986 • FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT AT 235-2550. • DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE • WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION. OF R4' �� .0 ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR z ea O MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 04? 4 T�Q SEP'�E��P BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR December 3, 1986 Reed Cahill 9105 N.E. 1st Street Bellevue, WA 98004 Subject: Heritage Village Apartments File: SA-110-86, ECF-091-86 Dear Mr. Cahill: This letter is written as a follow up to our telephone conversation on December 3, 1986, regarding the above referenced site plan approval application. When the City's Environmental Review Committee reviewed the application on November 19, 1986, they issued a determination of Non-Significance for the project. They withheld approving the site plan, however. There was a concern about the recreation area at the eastern end of the site on how it was to be linked with all of the housing on the site. Upon viewing the site plan, it tends to be linked directly to buildings "3" and "6" and has an appearance of isolation from the other four buildings. What the Committee would like to see is a revised site plan showing walkways that will interconnect the recreational area with all six buildings. Please provide to the Building and Zoning Department six (6) copies of a revised plan depicting this requested information. Sincerely, Jerry F. Lind Land Use Inspector JF::csb:3296Z • TO: RENTON LDING AND ZONING DEPARTMI i7- P/AN SUBJECT: - NNWR1 CONCERNS PROPERTY: EAST SIDE OF 1626 GRANT AVE. S, RENTON OWNER: RICHARD SHORE AS ONE OF THE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY OWNERS BORDERING THE WEST END OF THE SUBJECT SITE, I HAVE THE FOLLOWING CONCERNS REGARDING IT' S PROPOSED-ft N €S,Te. MY CONCERNS ARE AS FOLLOWS: 1 . LOSS OF SCENIC VIEW IF THE HIGHT OF THE PROPOSED STRUCTURES IN THE EASTERN PORTION OF THE SITE EXCEEDS 30' THEN THERE IS A POSSIBILITY THAT MY WESTERLY VIEW OF THE VALLEY AND OLYMPICS WILL BE OBSTRUCTED. THIS 30' LIMIT IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AS THE EXACT HIGHT CAN ONLY BE DETERMINED BY ACTUAL OBSERVATION AND MEASUREMENT PRIOR TO APPROVAL. 2. LOSS OF PRIVACY REPLACEMENT OF THE CURRENT BALD WIRE FENCE DIVIDING MY PROPERTY WITH MR SHORES BY AT LEAST A SOLID 8'.WOOD FENCE WOULD BE REQUIRED TO CONTINUE THE SENSE OF PRIVACY I NOW ENJOY. 3. POSSIBLE NOISE POLLUTION ADDITION OF 30 MULTI FAMILY UNITS IS BOUND TO INCREASE THE CURRENT NOISE LEVEL IN THE AREA. THIS NOISE LEVEL COULD BE INTOLERABLE IF THEIR ISN'T AN ADEQUATE BUFFER BETWEEN THE PROPOSED STRUCTURES AND/OR RECREATIONAL AREA AT FAR EAST END OF MR SHORE'S PROPERTY. IN CONCLUSION, I CAN UNDERSTAND MR. SHORE'S POSITION WANTING TO UTILIZE HIS PROPERTY TO IT'S POTENTIAL. MY ONLY CONCERN IS THAT WITHOUT ADEQUATE INVESTIGATION PRIOR TO ANY ZONING APPROVAL THERE COULD BE SOME SERIOUS ADVERSE AFFECTS TO THE EXISTING TRANQUILITY OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD. RAYMO G BARRY 1625 JONES DRIVE SE RENTON,WA, 98055 HOME PHONE: 235-4974 OFFICE PHONE: 2370292 CITY Qf RRf3TOE4 M N" DEC 1 1996 BUILDfNG,:_.. P� Richard Shore R-015-85 April 17, 1985 _,r Page 6 0/ 2. No building within 250 feet of the east property line shall be permitted to exceed 35 feet in height from the existing ground elevation, nor shall any such building exceed a floor print of 4,000 sq ft. 3. No building shall be greater than 50 feet in height above the existing ground elevation on any other locations on the site. 4. The density on each separately zoned portion of the subject site shall not exceed that permitted by the underlying zoning provisions, and in no event shall the total unit density of the entire subject site exceed 30 units. 5. Site plan review of any development of the subject site shall be required. ORDERED THIS 17th day of April, 1985. L_ - :4— KIA"- FRED J. KA MAN HEARING EX MINER TRANSMITTED THIS 17th day of April, 1985 to the parties of record: John Potter R. W:-Thorpe & Associates 815 Seattle Tower Seattle, Wa. 98101 Raymond Barry 1625 Jones Drive S.E. Renton, Wa. 98055 Richard Shore 1626 Grant Avenue South Renton, Wa. 98055 TRANSMITTED THIS 17th day of April, 1985 to the following: Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Richard Houghton, Public Works Director Larry M. Springer, Policy Development Director Members, Renton Planning Commission Ronald Nelson, Building & Zoning Director Jim Matthew, Fire Marshall Roger Blaylock. Zoning Administrator Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Renton Record-Chronicle Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before May 1, 1985. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law nr fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonaL,.y available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An anneal to the rite fniinnil is nnvarnori by Tit1R T\/ cactinn .inIF, whir•h rnn,,irea $h 2119N CITY OF RENTON • DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE • ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO.: ECF-091-86 APPLICATION NO(s).: SA-110-86 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of 30 multi family units on 1.85 acres of property zoned R-2 & R-3. PROPONENT: Bennett Group, Inc. (Heritage Village Apartments) . LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Property located at 1626 Grant Ave. S. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department. The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. • There is no comment period for this DNS. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Phone: 235-2550 APPEAL: You may appeal this determination in writing to Renton Hearing Examiner no . later than December 8, 1986. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. DATE OF DECISION: November 19, 1986 PUBLICATION DATE: November 24, 1986 Ronald G. Nelson La y . Sp i ger Building and Zoning Director Policy Devel men irector £houghton • Public W s Director • • AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION • '.``r'`I °TICE-OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ou '�t"'• "ENVIRONMENTAL'ei,r-: ;1, '.REVIEW COMMITTEE::. 1 Audra 3 r PF?,Tn • ,� s. . 3 e , being first duly sworn on oath States that RENTON;.WASHINGTONi, :'''The:Environmental•Review'Committee' he/she is the Chief Clerk of the ;r. •(ERC).has issued a.decleration of NON,`;a SIGNIFICANCE for,the f011owing project: . VALLEY NEWSPAPERS ;j BENNETT";GROUP, INC.• `(HERITAGE `' 0, VILLAGE APARTMENTS):Application for_;•' Daily News Journal, Daily Record Chronicle, Daily Globe News ap site plan approval to allow the construction" of,30:multi.family_units on :85acres.of,°1 Daily newspapers published six(6)times a week.That said newspapers a property,;zoned.:R-2a.&,R-3ce Property are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six Gated hY162s Grant egaue s t 'ac ,} r� Further information r regarding this action .> months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published is available,in the.Building and Zoning artment,;Municip'al„ in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King �n DepBuilding, Renton„; Washington; '235-2550.` Any appeal of County, Washington. Valley Newspapers have been approved as legal is ERC action must be:filed with the Renton"i newspapers by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for . Hearing Examiner by December 8;i98V%; King County. ; Published in the Valley Daily News Nov.:1 24,1986:;131953,z4i; -7,ri • The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Daily News Journal_, Daily Record Chronicle._, Daily Globe News , (and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice a Notice of E'nvironrnentn1 Determin:at-1 on was published on Ncvomber 24 ,, 1986 Pa953 The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing'publication is the • sum of $ l 6 r 3)j Subscribed and.sworn to before me this08th day of P1 e v 19 8 6 i ir • • • Nota /blic for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, CITY OF RENTON King 1' County, Washington. D [ 1 { II 1 I VN N87 Revised 10/84 L DEC 8 xr BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. 2118N ✓ NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a declaration of NON-SIGNIFICANCE for the following project: ECF-091-86 BENNETT GROUP, INC. (HERITAGE VILLAGE APARTMENTS) SA-110-86 Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of 30 multi family units on 1.85 acres of property zoned R-2 & R-3. Property located at 1626 Grant Avenue S. • Further information regarding this action is available in the Building and Zoning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. Any appeal of ERC action must be filed with the Renton Hearing Examiner by December 8, 1986. Published: November 24, 1986 Ff 1 - • OF I 4 - - NOVEMBER 19,• .1986 . ( 0 ) ,,foSEP OF PENDING . .. I • SITE PLAN APPLICATION , . , . . , . . . . . , . DESCRIPTION : SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-110-86 . • ' APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN •APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF .30 MULTI FAMILY UNITS ON 1.85 ACRES OF,PROPERTY ZONED R-2 & R-3. } • GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS: ' ' I . 1626 GRANT AVENUE SOUTH. • . . . PUBLIC APPROVALS REQUIRED : . . 1 . . . , . . , . , ; , 1.) SITE PLAN APPROVAL `• , ' • 2.) BUILDING PERMIT - PUBLIC COMMENTS WILL BE RECEIVED BY THE BUILDING '& ZONING DEPARTMENT ANYTIME PRIOR TO PUB.LIC HEARINGS • • AND DURING PUBLIC HEARINGS. • ***** . COMMENTS WILL :BE 'RECEIVED UNTIL DECEMBER 3, 1986, 5:00 PM. ***** FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY. OF RENTON ' BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT. PROPER AUTHORIZATION M ETT CQOUBI) CITY OF rLP`.JIa:i EJ . IT, l�`i r October 31, 1986 • _ NOV 4 1986 DEPT. City of 'Renton Building & Zoning Department 300 Mill Avenue So. Renton, WA 98055 RE: SA 110 86 Enclosed please find name and address information for the above referenced file. Feel free to call if you have any questions or if further information is required. Sincerely, BENNETT -GROUP, INC. / odd R. Bennett President Enclosure TRB/kn/27COR 5729 Lake View Drive • Kirkland, WA 98033 • (206) 827-7436 • Heritage Village Apartments 1626 Grant Avenue So. Renton, Washington 1) Southeast - Lot 5 Marilyn H. Rodgers Rolling Hills 1709 Jones Drive S.E. Renton, WA 98055 226-4717 2) East - Lot 6 Robert Barnhart Rolling Hills 1633 Jones Drive S.E. Renton, WA 98055 xxx-xxxx 3) Northeast - Lot 7 Raymond Berry 1626 Jones Drive S.E. Renton, WA 98055 235-4979 4) South Belle Snelson 1708 Grant Avenue So. Renton, WA 98055 255-4457 5) North Sarah E. McDonald 1600 Grant Avenue So. Renton, WA 98055 228-7322 /27HVA 'igy ..+-wsw wry as alt y 4 R-015-135 April 17, 1985 Page 2 Mr. Blaylock questioned if the hearing should be continued to a date certain as pertains to the requested changes by the applicant. It was pointed out that these changes would not place any new impacts on the environment, and the only affect would be the buildings being placed in multiple units instead of duplexes over a larger portion of the site. It was determined by staff that the application should be heard as it is still within the scope of the environmental review; still meets the legal notifications stated as 1.91 acres; and is a design modification that happens without any subsequent environmental impacts that can be detected. The only difference is that the R-3 demarcation line was 375 ft. and now the proposal is to use a 150 ft. demarcation, so west of the line would be R-3 and east of the line would be R-2. The change in boundaries is the fact that in the R-2 classfication, in order to build a triplex or fourplex unit the applicant would have to come back for conditional use permit approval. The applicant would prefer to have flexibility on the bulk of the buildings so they can build without coming back for site plan review. Mr. Blaylock continued stating the applicant has agreed that the eastern 250 ft. of the property will not exceed the height of the R-2 classification, and the ERC is concerned about the single family residences in the area that have established views in this corridor. Height of buildings on this eastern property line could intrude into a visual corridor as well as looking down into the single family area, Mr. Blaylock continued discussing the elevation projections for the buildings, and said the area to the south was zoned so as to create a R-2 buffer with a maximum height of 35 ft. which is comparable to the single family area and the R-3 in front. A review of the criteria to be considered for a rezone request was made. The City Council has made a decision to vacate a portion of S.E. 18th Street forcing all of the access onto Grant Avenue South. The City has put in substantial improvements which would permit this property to develop at a higher density than a single family designation. It is felt the applicant is timely in his request. It was pointed out that the applicant has taken a density and height reduction and maximum size of footprint for the building but has asked for more flexibility in design. There were enough concerns about the buffered area that staff feels site plan approval should be required. Mr. Blaylock stated it was requested by staff that the project be approved and recommended to the City Council as amended by the applicant's letter of March 22, 1985, subject to restrictive covenants requiring site plan approval and specific limitations on design previously agreed to by the applicant. There was discussion between the Hearing Examiner and Roger Blaylock regarding the exact proposal being made. Mr. Blaylock stated he felt it was a contract rezone, but the Hearing Examiner stated you can not upzone with contract limitations in an R-2 zone, only down-zone. He stated if it is not a PUD, which would blend the zoning on the R-2 and R-3, then the R-2 zoning limitations would have to be respected. At this point the applicant's representative asked to be permitted to clarify the request. Responding was: John Potter R. W. Thorpe & Associates 815 Seattle Tower Seattle, Washington, 98101 Mr. Potter submitted a revised east-west cross-section which had not as yet been presented to staff. He clarified the request by stating it is their intention to rezone the property from the easterly property line going west as R-2 for 150 ft. to serve as a transition zone. The next 100 ft. would be zoned R-3, but placing a covenant on that 100 ft. section to a 35 ft. height limit as well as a 4000 sq. ft. building floor print. There would then be a clear demarcation between the R-2 and R-3 zone at the 150 ft. line west of the east property line. The R-2 would be developed to the R-2 zone requirements. He stated to further mitigate potential impacts they propose to buffer along the easterly property line. Their i irst building will not occur within the first 50 ft. of the property line. Mr. Potter continued stating he felt there is a clear demarcation in the area which began approximately 10 years ago. The transmission line easements lend to a feeling of openess by not permitting any building to take place under them. He did inquire if it would be appropriate at this time to have the Examiner consider setback modifications for the R-3 zone in light of possible rezoning on the entire area in the future. Adjacent property is zoned G-1 He noted the Comprehensive Plan as newly adopted is looking at the surrounding area for possible rezoning, and felt they would like to use the 12 ft. setback given adjacent property users. The Hearing Examiner replied that the applicant should discuss this with the Building Department when he comes in with the actual building floor print. Mr. Potter had no further comments at this time. o ITY OF RENTC .,: 1 FILE NO(S): DP_ UO U , BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT -© _-_� �N� MASTER APPLICATION NOTE TO APPLICANT: Since this is a comprehensive application form, only those items related to your specific type of application(s) are to be completed. (Please print or type. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) APPLICANT I TYPE OF APPLICATION NAME FEES Bennett Group, Inc. . Q REZONE*(FROM TO ) ADDRESS 5729 Lake View Drive EJ SPECIAL PERMIT* CITY ZIP TEMPORARY PERMIT* . 10 CYJAIZ 1+GRAL USE :'E1 MIT* Kirkland 98033 TELEPHONE En SITE PLAN APPROVAL :�1p,- SPECIAL PERMIT FOR GRADE AND FILL 206-827-7436 No. of Cubic Yards: CONTACT PERSON Q VARIANCE* . From Section: • NAME 1 * Justification Required Todd Bennett/q6 /z6OP *NI fo-P9w) , . ADDRESS SUBDIVISIONS: ' �JSame 5 ,.Lr , 0 SHORT PLAT 1 CITY ZIP Q TENTATIVE PLAT Ut-i'M hiP11 %oo 9> 0 PRELIMINARY PLAT TELEPHONE r Q FINAL PLAT (0-- WI, 2-Z 3 5 (i1I4 .fil i iAi El WAIVER � �� l (Justification'Required) NAME I OWNER NO. OF LOTS: r_ ��•' 1 PLAT NAME: ADDRESS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: 0 PRELIMINARY CITY ZIP a FINAL P.U.D. NAME: TELEPHONE 0 Residential 0 Industrial Commercial Mixed LOCATION MOBILE HOME PARKS; PROPERTY ADDRESS Q TENTATIVE AN I A � �� • S• � 9v EXISTING USE hlr PRESENT ZONING PRELIMINARY FINAL Single Family . R-2 & R-3 PROPOSED USE PARK NAME: Multi-family residential (30 units) NUMBER OF SPACES: ,ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE ILO© •SQ. FT. ACRES '— AREA: I 80, 580 I 1. 85 I I 00 TOTAL FEES A-'"(0 er,:mxuauern�� gpiio ;Ni ;5 ' YaYea STAFF USE ONLY -- ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING _- , �4tl+ s.. ignumommim DATEPIT1 0@y� „ u!) APPLICATION RECEIVED BY: ,� �p ��,``., L k49.t.e u:.`, Nay APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: _� G _ � OCT 7 1g86 Q Accepted ...- ,. Incomplete Notification Sent On - - ` 'By: -- - BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. (In do s) DATE ROUTED ADDITIONAL MATERIAL RECEIVED BY: • APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: - - 2-8 _ Q Accepted QIncomplete Notification Sent On By: . (Initials) ROUTED TO: i" Building . C a Design Eng. i Fire 421 Parks D�Police . O\Policy Dev. 621 Traffic Eng. 1:3\Utilities Ilk ' I RRVTSF.r 1_11_s A K 1 Legal description of property (if more space is required, attach a separate sheet). See Attached • • AFFIDAVIT - . i, zQD/2 Glea�. .��:.�, being duly sworn, declare that I am , Jautiiurizeu iepreseniative io act for the property owner,L_Jowner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. SUBSCRIBED;AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS 7 PcDAY . OF 19, NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGT N�� 'iyr-a-i- RESIDING AT . - - - (Name of Notary Public) (Si nature of Owner) � "� . y '(ALJ,diu s) (Address) • M ,, id td G//� ' 96&33 _ - (City) (State) (Zip).' (Telephone) Acceptance of this application and required filing fee -does not constitute a complete application. Plans and other materials required to constitute a complete application are listed in the "Application Procedure." Form #174 , is ;1---'�- IDAYO® . ., > ECEID C,A,I1-iOCL • ,'A]n L]-iUT�(CU9 [P Z • October 6, 1986 111,4 OCT 7 1�� S L.t'' Project Narrative Heritage Village Apartments BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. 1626 Grant Avenue South Renton, Washington Project • The above referenced project is a proposed 30 unit apart-. . ment complex on 1.85 acres of gently rolling pastoral land just north of the intersection of Grant Avenue South and 18th Street in Renton. An existing older single family dwelling and several outbuildings will be demolished to make way for a complex of six smaller multi-unit buildings of a maximum of two stories. A winding entry driveway thru • the middle of the complex will help to create a "village" atmosphere initiated by the smaller scale structures in project. Existing trees and hedges will be saved wherever possible . to provide mature landscaping between the property and ad- jacent single family'homes. An existing pond will be used to whatever extent possible in the anticipated storm water detention system. New landscaping around the pond and the new buildings will help frame offsite views and promote the "natural " feeling of the site development. The dwelling units will be mostly two bedroom units with • several three bedroom units to the east end of the property for larger families to be near the proposed play area and picnic area with its basketball and pickleball pad. The largest building will contain six dwelling units (three up ' and three down) with outside stair access and exterior decks or patios. The buildings will have a "New England Village" flavor with horizontal bevel siding, corner boards, and small paned windows with shutters. Between the separate • buildings will be smaller parking areas surrounding the out- side property perimeter which will provide parking for a • total of 53 cars. A total of 30 spaces will have flat carports. The Heritage Village Apartments will probably be ready to begin construction in early winter-spring 1987 and the project should be available for new • occupancy in the summer of 1987. The apartments will be constructed all in one phase and all proposed buildings and landscaping will be totally com- r, O pleted before the project is to be ,N Occupied. 4111 • Anil L A[LoNA 5HEA11ICLII TWO 3322B-D4TCD% D YflI ?[I3 U o1 C a11-1C119 1-95 HERITAGE VILLAGE APARTMENTS COLOR SELECTION: ALTERNATING BUILDINGS USE ALTERNATE COLOR SCHEMES 260G ( !!!014•44444 ROOF RAKE TRIM - BURGUNDY FASCIA AND CORNER BOARDS - WHITE SIDING - LIGHT BLUE 711\ ROOF RAKE TRIM - TERRA COTTA FASCIA AND CORNER BOARDS - WHITE SIDING - TAN PICKET r'KNCE BOARDS - WHITE r ATCDCb Aft I A S5WAUT_LL I�f11f22 3220049XIN HERITAGE VILLAGE AI____VENTS — PROPOSED BUILDING • illuminator ENTRY LIGHTS �, GD-2612 I 1138" I 1 �s� F 11111111161111..- Ct rl�l • rt s LOCK SCREW a 22%* II Y— 41 ., IIt�,Jml►I iLII_. ► 1►,_l(i/I II,Id, i The Illuminator is the answer when aW� �` Lamp Furnished LO 1156(21.2W) wide ground corer light is needed- It e ,,,: gives even illumination on driveways, Light Spread 27'Diameter , `" ' long flights of steps, terraces and park- ing area borders. A shield(#2612-S) Alternate Lamps LO 67(6.9W) xs.:.. „ • ..,- .., , for the downhill side of the!I- (See Lamp Chart. LO 89(6.8W) q• r".�..� F,______. Page 26) LO 93(12.3W) luminator is available to prevent look- LO 1141(15.8W) ing directly into the light source. LO 1195(35.4W) Mounting Cast aluminum spike .. li Options Shield#2612-S Shield snaps around shade base and di- " r`+ a rect light away from sharp cut-off lines on �,"�,i , z � °'` fences,walls. Shields light from eyes on long P ,A. iov §#*x? `i• he`d stairs.All white. x "+ "" * le Pathiiter GD-1112 F 12" — r - ti,, T --- -''-' 4" .I . SWIVEL I AlliFi .. ''' ': -- 53/a" I1_�/IIJIIhILI,._ J1�ui•.11 uv I Iii, END VIEW a The Pathiiter is designed for controlled lighting onto a walkway, narrow Lamp Furnished 2-LO 89(6.8W) planter or garden wall, or into shrub- (Ibtal 13.6W) bery.The adjustable top tilts 90°to the Light Spread At 90° sides and produces a long light pattern (as shown) "' from each end. Placing the stem at an 4 ft. x 16 ft. ' ngle produces many additional ef- fects.. Alternate Lamps LO 67(6.9W) (See Lamp Chart, LO 93(12.3W) Page 26) LO 1141(15.8W) LO 1156(21.2W) Mounting Cast aluminum Spike 6 1 w0 ' Navigator GD-0905 ki F-- 5" -{ Atati.. � k{ I i Thy. ,,, r.,.; ' - i ip . ... 8„ LOCK SCREW — It t_111U/1J1 )I,ltu11_1wlI1I,.— �^ "" 0'04, „-,..- The Navigator uses downlight to add safety and beauty to outdoor living Lamp Furnished LO 93 (12.3W) • areas. Used to light steps, paths, Light Spread 10'Diameter - walkways, and borders, the Navigator IIIPP can also light corner plantings to visu- Alternate Lamps LO 67(6.9W) ally extend garden depth. (See Lamp Chart, LO 89(6.8W) Page 26) IA)1141(15.8W) LO 1156(21.2W) Mounting Cast aluminum spike HERITAGE VILLAGE APARTMENTS — PROPOSED PARKING V 8�/2„ ENTRY LIGHTS Footliter _ I ,i GD-1409 `t�� T 5 y. 1111\:� ,, sir 1, 4 Y- z" \AT i_ t i ..., , , P 121" LOCK SCREW } `r ` i;t� ., t \1JLI,_1111.im1. _11.1�—(1,JHiL._ t',-6 p , 1l+ � "�• e• � = Our most popular fixture, the Footliter 3u;44:' ,y , : i�:. ` • Lamp Furnished LO 93 (12.3W) • - �a, uses downlights below knee level for AO iMrjl �,;,� t"r�,a safety. Its low profile keeps the light Light Spread 14'Diameter y % out of your eyes,yet provides a 14-foot diameter circle of light. A shield is Alternate Lamps LO 67(6.9W) _, .17 „' .`.-`. , '• ��e . .? available(#1409-S)for use on the (See Lamp Chart, LO 89(6.8W) • ..•- downhill side of the Footliter to pre Page 26) LO 1141(15.8W) vent eye/lamp contact when moving LO 1156(21.2W) up the hill. LO 1195(35.4W) Mounting Cast aluminum spike Options Shield#1409-S IIP Shield snaps around shade base and di- rects light away from sharp cut-off lines on PI fences,walls.Shields light from eyes on long stairs. All white. 01409•S fi _._ 10 • pF RA, Aj, ECF: FS'F-Oql-g(D `.' 4$ ,0 z City of Renton o • ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST - 0 Qom. 44, SE PI Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43,21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for allproposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. • Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the. best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. _ The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impacts. Use of Checklist for Nonproject Proposals: (Please Type or Print Legibly) Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Heritage Village Apartments, 1626 Grant Avenue So, Renton, WA 2. Name of applicant: Bennett Group, Inc. 3. -Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 5729 Lake View Drive, Kirkland; WA 98033 827-7436 4. Date checklist prepared: October 1, 1986 S. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): -• Checklist & Site Plan Review Application October 6, 1986 Building Permit Application December 15, 1986 Begin Construction CITY OF F,ENeaON January 15, 1986 Building Occupancy ,, } • ' June 15, 1987 [idiEm OCT 7 1986 BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansions, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? if yes, explain. All proposed work is included in this application. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. A topographic land survey was prepared on February 26, 1986 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. Do not know. 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, • if known. Site plan review SEPA environmental checklist City of Renton Building Permit: Mechanical permit, electrical permit 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. The project is a proposed. 30. unit multi- family residential development comprised of 6 separate buildings and carports for 30 vehicles with asphalt paved parking on site for 53 automobiles total. The site is 159.49 ' x. 544. 66 (appoximately 1. 85 acres) and slopes -up from west to east approximately 50 feet differencE in elevations. The buildings are of wood frame with sloping roofs and the maximum building height is two stories. A play area is provided on a knoll toward the east property__line. An existing old house and outbuildings will be demolished. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topography map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The property is....located on Grant Avenue South near 18th Street. The property is approximately 1 mile uphill to the east of the intersection of Interstate .405 and Benson Road South. There are several multi-famil projects in the neighborhood and some single family homes immediately adjacent. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS i., 1. EARTH a. General description 'of the site (circle one);' flat rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other . b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? Approximately' 2 feet in' 10. feet (2.0%) c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, caly, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland." • The soil is generally sandy loam. d. Are there surface indications •or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. There:_appears to be no unstable soil visible on the site.. t • e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. There will be a small amount of cu and fill necessary for parking lot grading and to adjust finish grades around the separate buildings. All cut and fill material can be accommodated w/on-site material. Total cut d fill materi 1. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use. it so,is amount generally describe. 2, 000 CU. Approximately 23% of the site is building area and 28% . of the site is asphalt paving; for a total impervious area of 51% Total landscaping area is 49%. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? The major portion of non-impervious areas will be in planted lawn which_ will prevent erosion. Existing lawn areas and planting/ trees will be retained where possible. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Automobile and construction vehicle ex- haust will be present .during the construction process as well as general dust and odors associated with building construction. Wher the project is completed', there will be vehicle exhaust and smoke from wood burning fireplaces in) unknown quantities. b. Are there any off-:site sources of emission. Unknown. c. Proposed measures to reduce. or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Where possible, construction debris will be removed from sate rather than being burned on site. 3. WATER a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. There- is a small existing pond in the southwest corner of the property that is fed by a small seasonal creek .running east to west along the south property line. The pond has an outlet pipe..:for 'occassional draining. It is anticipate that the pond will be used as part of the storm water run-off • retention system. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. See' plot plan for proposed- project showing- pond location. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. Does not apply - 3 - 1~ 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or' diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximately quantities if known. Does not apply 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. Does not apply 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. Does not apply b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and appaoximately quantities if known. Does not apply V 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals . . .; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. Does not apply c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Storm water::will be collected in gutters and downspouts on the buildings and thru catch basins in the parking areas . The deten- tion system will probably be composed of some underground pipe storage and the balance of runoff to be stored in the existing pond, The detention system will then release runoff into the soil at prescribed flow rates per. code. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Oil and: gasoline residue from the asphalt parking areas can enter the surface and ground water system, but in line oil separatersL will be used to extract these elements within the detention system. . - 4 - ', • d. Proposed measures to. reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: See item c (2) above 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous..tree: alder, maple, aspen, other . 'p evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other ' it Shrubs grass o crop or grain '1. Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other o water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other o other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Some deciduous and evergreen trees will be removed in the asphalt parking areas . Also some small shrubs will be removed around the existing old house. Existing trees, shrubs, and lawn area will be retained wherever possible. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Unknown. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Proposed lands in will_ be in buffer areas along all 4property lines as shown on €ne pio plan. Existing trees, shrubs, and grass areas will be retained wherever pos= s ible. Interior project plantings will consist of deciduous trees/shrub: together w/evergreen trees to screen parking areas '& provide privacy am 5. sAiiihvegion between bldgs. Trees along the driveway on both sides will serve to "soften" the impact of vehicular traffic thru the site. a. . Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: Hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds ther Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Unknown c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Unknown - 5 - d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife. if any: Natural vegetation and the existing pond which are potential homes for wildlife will be retained. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Both electricity and natural gas is available to the site. _. :. Heating will most probably be electric baseboard in each unit. • b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. The property faces south along the long dimension property line. The property adjacent to the north is higher in elevation so this project would not inhibit the use of solar energy applica- tions on that property. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce. or control energy impacts, if any: The project will be substantially composed of two story buildings with common walls between adjacent units . There- fore heat loss out of walls will be minimized and heated second floor apartments above the first floor apartments will minimize heat loss upward. All apartment doors and windows will have 7. Environmental Health • (continued below) a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. Does not apply 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Fire Department services would be required in the case of a building fire. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: The apartment units will be in several separate buildings and 4 of the buildings which are least accessible will be sprinklered; both of these measures will substantially reduce fire risk. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Traffic from trucks and automobiles on Grant Avenue So. which is adjacent to the site would be the only potential source of noise. 6.c. (continued) . .insulated glass; and insulation to conform to the energy code for Wa.:s6i-ngton State. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. During construction, traffic and equipment operation: noise would be generated between the hours of 7: 30 am to 6: 30 pm. Once the, project is completed, traffic noise from residents automobiles will be generated from approximately 6 : 30 am to 8.: 30 pm. . 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: During construction, working noise will be limited where possible to weekdays and mid-day hours (10: 00.:_am to 6: 00 pm) so as not to disturb local residential neighbors during mornings, evenings and weekends. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Current. use is single family residential on this site and those immediately adjacent. Other uses in the neighborhood are - large multi-family projects. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe.. .. . . Does not apply c.' Describe any structures on the site. There is an existing two story residence, a detached garage, and two small outbuildings. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? All of the structures will be demolished prior to the new projeci - construction. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Current zoning is R-2 and R=3.;as the result of a rezone on April '17, 1985. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? The comprehensive plan designation is for single family residential. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Does not apply h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify.' • Does not apply i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Approximately 70 people would reside. in the completed apartment complex. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? The completed project would displace a family of four living in the existing residence. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: The displaced family has the opportunity to live in one of the completed apartment units. - 7 - • 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The c'bmpleted project is of multi- family scale to be compatible with neighboringcmulti-family pro- jects. However, the design materials and the smaller scale of th separate buildings is compatible in scale w/adjacent single faml 9. Housing residences. a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. The project contains. 30 units of middle income level housing. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. ' One single family dwelling of middle income level is being eliminated. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: See item 8 (k) 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. The tallest proposed structure is 30 feet above existing garage to the roof ridge. The principal exterior building material is horizontal bevel siding. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? There would be minimal view blockage by the new structures because existing site trees are. taller than the proposed buildings. However, there might be some view blockage due to building density at ground level. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: The apartment project is composed of several small buildings to reduce the potential view blockage that might be caused by larger more massive structures. The resulting effect will be more of a "village" atmosphere. 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? There might be some glare from apartment windows due to sensets in the afternoon towards Grant Avenue So. as an automobile approaches the project from the southwest. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Light or glare will probably not be of sufficient intensity to cause a safety hazard. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Street lights on Grant Avenue So. will generally light the entry drive, but should have minimal glare impact. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Landscaping along the site perimeter buffer and the higher ground elevation of the prject relative to Grant Avenue South should mitigate any glare impact. - 8 - ^1 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities. 'are in the immediate vicinity? There are no recreation facilities immediately adjacent to the site. • b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control 'impacts on recreation. including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: A play area and picnic area will be provided on the east end of the site, away from the apartment units and separated from automobile traffic. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on. or proposed for. national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. Does not apply b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. Does not apply c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Does not apply 14. Transportation . a. ' Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The vicinity map shows the access to the site by means of Benson Road South, Puget Drive and then Grant Avenue South. The project is approximately 1 mile east of Interstate 405. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximately distance to the nearest transit stop? Unknown c. How many parking spaces would the completed, project have? How many would the project eliminate? The project will contain 53 parking spaces per code. An existinc two car garage will be eliminated. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or,streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). Aside from the new project entry driveway and parking areas, no new public or private street development will be required. - 9 - e. Will the proje,.. use (or occur in the immediate ay of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. Does not apply f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Approximately 198 vehicular trips per day would be generated, mostly between the hours of 7 : 30 - 9.:30 am and 4:30-6 :30 pm(lowrise=6 . 6 trips/unit/ g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: day) Tenants can carpool to work to reduce the number of vehicular trips. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection,_ health, care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. The, project will increase the need (incremen- tally) for additional fire protection, health care, schools, and police protection, based on the influx of approximately 70 new residents to the area. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. The four structures to the east on the site will be sprinklered to reduce the risk of fire. 16. Utilities a. Ci c1P utilities currently available at the site• electricit natural gas Ovate use servio 'telephorJsanitary sewer, eptic system, o b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Water-From 12"o main in Grant Avenue So. Sanitary Sewer-From trunk line in Grant Avenue at manhole 120 feet south of S.W. property corner (in.elevation 300 ' ) Electricity - From an existing power box at the N.U. corner of the site. Telephone _ From an existing power box: at the N.W. corner of the site. (continued at bottom of page) C. SIGNATURE' I, the undersigned, state. that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood' that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration. of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. �1 Proponent: • o d.-eLN- ' _ . Name Printed: Todd R. Bennett 16. b. (continued) All utilities will be brought up beneath the central access driveway and branched out to the individual structures. - 10 - #176 11-8-21 a ._y � " � LEGAL DU`,i WI(I( lin: d C. Shore Property un Lrant Ave. ;,, • • PARCEL. 1 That portion of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 20, Township 23 North, Range 5 East W.M. described as follows: Beginninq 4t the Northeast corner of sa!d subdivision; thence South 0°O8'49" West along the East line thereof, 4l5.)9 feet; thence Westerly, parallel with the North line of said subdivision. 341.55 feet; • Thence South 0°08'49" West 25 feet to the true point of beginning; thence continuing South 0°08'49" West 65 feet; Thence Westerly parallel with said North line 159.35 feet to the Westerly line of a tract conveyed to F1.f. Sullivan and Maureen • P. Sullivan, his wife, by deed recorded under Auditor's File Ito. 3454902; Thence North 26°18'50" West along said Westerly line, 70.99 feet; • more or less, to a line parallel with the North line of said sub- division which passes through the true point. of beginning; thence Easterly 191 feet to the true point c,f beginning. • Situated in the City of Renton, County of King, ;fate of Has_hinntn Parcel 2 • That portion of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1j4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 20, Township 23 North, Range 5 East W.;t. , described as follows: • Beginning on the East line of-said subdivision at a point which Is South 0°08'49" West 475.79 feet from the Northeast corner thereof; Thence continuing along said line 15).4'9 toot, more or less , to a • point which 1s South 0°08'49" West 635.58 tout from said Northeast corner; • Thence West parallel with the North line of said subdivision 499.67 feet; Thence North 26°18'59" West to an Intersection with a line extending Westerly through said point of beginning and parallel with the North line of said subdivision; Thence East along said extended line to the point of beginning; EXCEPT a strip of land 30 feet wide parallel with and adjoining the Westerly line of the above described tract; . AND EXCEPT that portion described as follows: ' Beginning at a point on the North line of the above described tract which is 341.55 feet Westerly of the northeast corner; thence South 0°08'49" West 25 feet to the true point of beginning; Thence continuing South 0°08'49" West 65 feet; Thence Westerly parallel with said North line 159.35 feet to the Westerly line of a tract conveyed to M.F. Sullivan and Maureen P. Sullivan, his wife,' by deed recorded under Auditor's File NO. • 3454902; Thence North 26°18'59" West alone said Westerly line 70.99 feet, more or less, to a line parallel with the North line of :aid subdivision which passe, through the true point of beginning. Thence Easterly 191 feet to the true point of beginning; Situated in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington. G.TY el F,tN:oN RI FEB 8 1985 `" ENDING OF FILE FILETITLE Offill, FA / . • d SA . i1U . .