HomeMy WebLinkAboutECF_SEPA_Checklist_251107_v1
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 1 of 15
SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
Purpose of checklist:
Governmental agencies use this checklist to help determine whether the environmental impacts of your
proposal are significant. This information is also helpful to determine if available avoidance, minimization
or compensatory mitigation measures will address the probable significant impacts or if an environmental
impact statement will be prepared to further analyze the proposal.
Instructions for applicants:
This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Please
answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. You may need to consult
with an agency specialist or private consultant for some questions. You may use “not applicable” or
"does not apply" only when you can explain why it does not apply and not when the answer is unknown.
You may also attach or incorporate by reference additional studies reports. Complete and accurate
answers to these questions often avoid delays with the SEPA process as well as later in the decision-
making process.
The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of
time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal
or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your
answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant
adverse impact.
Instructions for Lead Agencies:
Please adjust the format of this template as needed. Additional information may be necessary to
evaluate the existing environment, all interrelated aspects of the proposal and an analysis of adverse
impacts. The checklist is considered the first but not necessarily the only source of information needed to
make an adequate threshold determination. Once a threshold determination is made, the lead agency is
responsible for the completeness and accuracy of the checklist and other supporting documents.
Use of checklist for nonproject proposals:
For nonproject proposals (such as ordinances, regulations, plans and programs), complete the applicable
parts of sections A and B plus the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). Please
completely answer all questions that apply and note that the words "project," "applicant," and "property or
site" should be read as "proposal," "proponent," and "affected geographic area," respectively. The lead
agency may exclude (for non-projects) questions in Part B - Environmental Elements –that do not
contribute meaningfully to the analysis of the proposal.
A. Background [HELP]
1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Vision House Phase IV
2. Name of applicant: Vision House
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 2 of 15
3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person:
Applicant:
Vision House
Attn: Derek Sciba
PO Box 2951
Renton, WA 98056
206-713-5564
Contact:
Encompass Engineering & Surveying
Attn: Sam Salo
165 NE Juniper St., Suite 201
Issaquah, WA 98027
425-392-0250
4. Date checklist prepared: 11/07/2025
5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton
6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable):
Permitting during 2025/26, construction during Summer 2027.
7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or
connected with this proposal? If yes, explain.
No
8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be
prepared, directly related to this proposal.
• Critical Area Report by Wetlands & Streams by Evergreen Aquatic dated
10/14/2025.
• Geotechnical Engineering Report by Terra Associates, Inc. dated 04/15/2022
9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other
proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain.
No.
10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known.
The required governmental approvals and permits include site plan review,
environmental review, and building permits. Right-of-way permits will be needed if
curb cuts are needed for the driveways, and for various utility connections.
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 3 of 15
11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size
of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to
describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this
page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project
description.)
The Vision House Phase IV project proposes the construction of a mixed-use
building with below-grade parking. A mixture of commercial space and program
space for Vision House on the first floor with 28 residential villas on the second
and third floors. The west side of the first floor will contain a daycare center, while
the east side will be a mix of offices and conference rooms for Vision House Staff.
Residential Units will range from 770 SF to 1,000 SF. Additional parking is
proposed on the exterior of the building along the western side of the building
and the eastern property line. Access to the parking garage is proposed on the
eastern side of the building and a 5-foot sidewalk wraps around the north, south,
and west sides of the building, connecting to the pedestrian entrances on either
side of the parking garage vehicle entrance and exit.
12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise
location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and
range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or
boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic
map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you
are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications
related to this checklist.
Legal Description:
The EAST 163.3 FEET FO THE NORTH 333.43 FEET OF THE WEST HALF OF THE
SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST
QUARTER OF THE SECTION 19, TOWNSHIPE 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST , W.M.,
RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON.
Property is located at 4XX Bremerton Ave NE, Renton, 98055,
Tax Parcel 102305-9086.
In the SE ¼ of SW ¼ Section 10, Township 23 N., Range 05 E., King County
B. Environmental Elements [HELP]
1. Earth [help]
a. General description of the site:
(circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other _____________
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)?
The steepest slope on the site is approximately 5%±.
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 4 of 15
c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat,
muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any
agricultural land of long-term commercial significance and whether the proposal results in
removing any of these soils.
AgC – Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, 8 to 15 slopes as shown on the
USDA/NRCS Soil Resource Report. See also Geotechnical Engineering Report
prepared by Terra Associates dated 4/15/2025, Appendix A.
d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so,
describe.
None known.
e. Describe the purpose, type, total area, and approximate quantities and total affected area of
any filling, excavation, and grading proposed. Indicate source of fill.
Approximately 1.2 Acres are to be regraded. This will incorporate approximately
1200cy cut and 2800cy of fill. The source of fill has not been determined at this
time.
f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe.
In the absence of best practices for erosion control, erosion could occur onsite.
g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project
construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)?
Approximately 66% of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces, including
access roads, walkways and buildings.
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any:
Implementation of Temporary Erosion and Sediment Control Plan(TESC),
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and other Best
Management Practices (BMPs), as required by code, will reduce or control
erosion or other impact to the earth.
2. Air [help]
a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal during construction,
operation, and maintenance when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and
give approximate quantities if known.
Air emissions are expected to be consistent with the machinery typically used in
construction and are regulated by the Puget Sound Clean Air Agency.
b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so,
generally describe.
None known.
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 5 of 15
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any:
None needed. The Puget Sound Clean Air Agency regulates air emissions.
3. Water [help]
a. Surface Water: [help]
1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including
year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe
type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into.
Wetlands and streams do not exist within the project site. A category III wetland
and Type Ns stream does exist south and east of the project site. A standard
width 75 foot buffer is required from the Category III wetland and a standard width
50 foot buffer is required from the Type Ns stream.
2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described
waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans.
The proposed building will be located within 200 feet of the wetland and stream,
but there is no building encroachment into the required buffers. Plans are
attached.
3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed
from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected.
Indicate the source of fill material.
N/A
4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general
description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known.
No.
5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan.
No.
6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so,
describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge.
No.
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 6 of 15
b. Ground Water: [help]
1) Will groundwater be withdrawn from a well for drinking water or other purposes? If so,
give a general description of the well, proposed uses and approximate quantities
withdrawn from the well. Will water be discharged to groundwater? Give general
description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known.
No.
2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or
other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the
following chemicals. . . ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the
number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the
number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve.
N/A
c. Water runoff (including stormwater):
1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection
and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow?
Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe.
Stormwater from the proposed development will be collected and conveyed to an on-site
detention vault followed by a Contech Filterra water quality system. It will then be
discharged towards the off-site wetland via dispersion trench.
2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe.
Unlikely. The finished project will be connected to the storm drainage system
and sanitary sewer. During construction, TESC measures will be in place, along
with other Best Management Practices, and the contractor will be required by
the City of Renton to have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) in
case of a problem with construction machinery.
3) Does the proposal alter or otherwise affect drainage patterns in the vicinity of the site? If
so, describe.
The project does not alter or otherwise affect drainage patterns in the vicinity of
the site as captured drainage for the lots will connect the existing adjacent
drainage conveyance.
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water, and drainage
pattern impacts, if any:
The detention was sized to accommodate stormwater runoff volume per City of
Renton standards. During construction, appropriate TESC and BMPs will
address temporary site drainage.
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 7 of 15
4. Plants [help]
a. Check the types of vegetation found on the site:
__X__deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other
__X__evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other
__X__shrubs
__X__grass
____pasture
____crop or grain
____ Orchards, vineyards or other permanent crops.
____ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other
____water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other
____other types of vegetation
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered?
All vegetation within proposed roads, access tracts, detention space tracts,
driveways and building envelopes will be removed.
b. List threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site.
There are no known threatened or endangered species known to be on or near
the site.
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance
vegetation on the site, if any:
Planter strips will be installed. Completed project will be landscaped after
construction. The northern portion of the site will have an open space area tract
around the existing play area.
e. List all noxious weeds and invasive species known to be on or near the site.
Himalayan blackberry is located around the perimeter of the site.
5. Animals [help]
a. List any birds and other animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known
to be on or near the site.
Examples include:
birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other:
mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other:
fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other ________
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 8 of 15
b. List any threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site.
None known.
c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain.
No local migration routes are known to cross the project site. Generally,
Western Washington is part of the Pacific Flyway.
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any:
Tree retention and replacement is proposed, and open space will be provided.
e. List any invasive animal species known to be on or near the site.
None known.
6. Energy and Natural Resources [help]
a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet
the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating,
manufacturing, etc.
The energy needs of the project will be met using either electric or natural gas or
a combination of both for heating, cooling, and appliances
b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties?
If so, generally describe.
This project will not affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent
properties.
c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal?
List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any:
Building construction will conform to local and states energy laws.
7. Environmental Health [help]
a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk
of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal?
If so, describe.
No environmental health hazards are anticipated as a result of this proposal.
1) Describe any known or possible contamination at the site from present or past uses.
There are no known present or past contaminations.
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 9 of 15
2) Describe existing hazardous chemicals/conditions that might affect project development
and design. This includes underground hazardous liquid and gas transmission pipelines
located within the project area and in the vicinity.
There are no known existing hazardous chemicals or conditions which might
affect the project development or design.
3) Describe any toxic or hazardous chemicals that might be stored, used, or produced
during the project's development or construction, or at any time during the operating
life of the project.
None anticipated.
4) Describe special emergency services that might be required.
Emergency Services needs will be consistent with those typical of a mixed-use
residential neighborhood.
5) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any:
None needed.
b. Noise
1. What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example:
traffic, equipment, operation, other)?
Existing noise is that which is typical to a mixed-use residential neighborhood.
2. What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a
short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)?
Indi-
cate what hours noise would come from the site.
Existing noise is that which is typical to a mixed-use residential neighborhood.
3. Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any:
The construction noise will be limited to the hours allowed by the City of Renton
noise ordinances. Construction hours will be indicated on the approved
construction plans and permits.
8. Land and Shoreline Use [help]
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Will the proposal affect current
land uses on nearby or adjacent properties? If so, describe.
The present use for the subject site is a parking area with a play structure
located on the north end of the site. There are no structures on the site.
Adjacent uses:
North – single family residential neighborhood
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 10 of 15
East – professional building
South – commercial uses
West – Previous Vision House project, multi-family residential
b. Has the project site been used as working farmlands or working forest lands? If so, describe.
How much agricultural or forest land of long-term commercial significance will be converted to
other uses as a result of the proposal, if any? If resource lands have not been designated,
how many acres in farmland or forest land tax status will be converted to nonfarm or non-
forest use?
No.
1) Will the proposal affect or be affected by surrounding working farm or forest land normal
business operations, such as oversize equipment access, the application of pesticides,
tilling, and harvesting? If so, how:
No.
c. Describe any structures on the site.
There is an existing play area in the north portion of this lot. The application
proposes to maintain the play structure and open space around the play
structure.
d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what?
No structures are proposed for demolition.
e. What is the current zoning classification of the site?
Commercial Arterial (CA)
Design District D in the Highlands Community Planning Area
f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site?
Commercial Mixed Use.
g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site?
N/A.
h. Has any part of the site been classified as a critical area by the city or county? If so, specify.
No.
i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project?
Approximately 70 people will reside in the proposed units.
Approximately 25 Vision House staff are anticipated to work in the VH office.
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 11 of 15
Approximately 4 commercial business employees are anticipated to work in the
commercial space (daycare).
j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace?
None. The site is currently vacant aside from the play area.
k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any:
N/A.
L. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land
uses and plans, if any:
The proposed project is a permitted use in the CA zone.
The proposed project will conform to applicable building and zoning codes.
m. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts to agricultural and forest lands of long-term
commercial significance, if any:
N/A. There are no agricultural or forest lands of long-term commercial
significance nearby.
9. Housing [help]
a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or
low-income housing.
Twenty-eight (28) residential units are proposed and will be located on the second
and third floors of the proposed building.
b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high,
middle, or low-income housing.
None.
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any:
The project will comply with the City of Renton comprehensive plan and current
zoning and development regulations.
10. Aesthetics [help]
a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is
the principal exterior building material(s) proposed?
The proposed structure will be approximately 50’-10.5” tall, which complies with
zoning code.
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 12 of 15
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed?
The adjacent properties may be able to see portions of the upper stories through
retained and proposed landscaping.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any:
The project will comply with applicable development regulations including tree
retention and replacement requirements, and landscaping requirements. The
building is offset over 90 feet from the north boundary, providing more separation
from the existing residential development. The building color scheme and
materials are proposed to be similar to existing structures to the west making for
a consistent aesthetic and design.
11. Light and Glare [help]
a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly
occur?
Anticipated light and glare will be consistent with that of a mixed-use multi-family
residential development.
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views?
It is not likely that light from the finished product would be a safety hazard or interfere
with views.
c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal?
Existing off-site sources of light or glare would be consistent with residential
neighborhoods, mixed-use development, and commercial development.
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any:
No measures are proposed to reduce or control light and glare aside from compliance
with the City of Renton Municipal Code.
12. Recreation [help]
a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity?
The City of Renton’s Heritage Park is a half mile southwest of the subject site, and King
County’s Maplewood Park is located just over a mile to the southeast of the subject site.
b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe.
No. The application proposes to maintain the existing open space and play area.
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 13 of 15
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation
opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any:
As proposed, the project will provide an enhanced open space area for a playground and
other landscaping upgrades that will be utilized by the residents and the future daycare.
13. Historic and cultural preservation [help]
a. Are there any buildings, structures, or sites, located on or near the site that are over 45 years
old listed in or eligible for listing in national, state, or local preservation registers? If so,
specifically describe.
There are no known buildings, structures, or sites of historic or cultural significance on
or near the site.
b. Are there any landmarks, features, or other evidence of Indian or historic use or occupation?
This may include human burials or old cemeteries. Are there any material evidence, artifacts,
or areas of cultural importance on or near the site? Please list any professional studies
conducted at the site to identify such resources.
None known on or immediately adjacent to the project site. The Department of
Archeology and Historical Preservation’s WISAARD mapping tool does not have the
project site mapped as including landmarks, features or other evidence of Indian or
historic use or occupation. If any indications are discovered during construction, work
will stop immediately and the appropriate authorities will be notified.
c. Describe the methods used to assess the potential impacts to cultural and historic resources
on or near the project site. Examples include consultation with tribes and the department of
archeology and historic preservation, archaeological surveys, historic maps, GIS data, etc.
No additional investigation regarding impacts to cultural and historical resources was
undertaken as there’s been no significant change on the property and surrounding
property.
The aerial photography available via King County iMap from 1936 shows no structures
and no visible disturbance to vegetation or soil.
d. Proposed measures to avoid, minimize, or compensate for loss, changes to, and
disturbance to resources. Please include plans for the above and any permits that may be
required.
Any discovery during construction activities will require stoppage of work and noticed.
14. Transportation [help]
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site or affected geographic area and describe
proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any.
Access will be gained from Bremerton Ave NE via the access drives through the existing
Vision House complex to the west. An access tying into the profession building to the
east is also proposed.
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 14 of 15
b. Is the site or affected geographic area currently served by public transit? If so, generally
describe. If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop?
There is a metro bus stop approximately one less than a quarter mile located on north
side of NE 4th St. just west of Duvall Ave NE and on the south side just on the other side
of the NE 4th St. and Duvall intersection.
c. How many additional parking spaces would the completed project or non-project proposal
have? How many would the project or proposal eliminate?
The project proposes 3 disabled stall and 33 regular stalls in the under-building parking.
An additional 31 parking spots are proposed around the periphery of the west building
façade and along the east property line.
d. Will the proposal require any new or improvements to existing roads, streets, pedestrian,
bicycle or state transportation facilities, not including driveways? If so, generally describe
(indicate whether public or private).
New sidewalk (private) for pedestrian circulation will be constructed on the north, west,
and south sides of the building. No new public improvements are proposed as the
subject site does not have public frontage and will be accessed via existing connections.
e. Will the project or proposal use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air
transportation? If so, generally describe.
This proposal will not use water, rail, or air transportation.
f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project or proposal?
If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur and what percentage of the volume would
be trucks (such as commercial and non-passenger vehicles). What data or transportation
models were used to make these estimates?
Approximately 59 am arriving and leaving peak trips, 65 pm arriving and leaving peak
trips are anticipated. A Trip Generation Report prepared by Heath & Associates is
provided with this proposal.
f. Will the proposal interfere with, affect or be affected by the movement of agricultural and
forest products on roads or streets in the area? If so, generally describe.
This project with not interfere with, affect or be affected by movement of agricultural and
forest products on roads or streets.
g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any:
The application will be reviewed for compliance with transportation impacts and
requirements. The NE 4th Street Corridor Improvements project identified in the Renton
TIP will provide access and/or capacity revisions in the project vicinity. Project
transportation impact fees may be applied toward the project.
Daycare drop off/pickup is located on the west side of the building and the proposed
parking exceeds the requirement. The drive aisle circles the buildings to ease
ingress/egress from the project site.
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 15 of 15
15. Public Services [help]
a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire
protection, police protection, public transit, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally
describe.
There will be an increased need for all public services typical of mixed-use development
upon completion of the project.
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any.
Mitigation and permit fees as required by the City will be paid at the time of the
development.
16. Utilities [help]
a. Circle utilities currently available at the site:
electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system,
other ___________
b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service,
and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might
be needed.
City of Renton will be providing sewer and water service. Electricity and gas service will
be provided by PSE.
C. Signature [HELP]
The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the
lead agency is relying on them to make its decision.
Signature:
Name of signee ___ ___Amy Donlan________________________ _______ __ .....
Position and Agency/Organization ____________________________________
Date Submitted:
BREMERTON AVE. NE
IN COMPLIANCE WITH CITY OF RENTON STANDARDS
Know what'sCall below.
before you dig.
R
Encompass
Eastern Washington Division
407 Swiftwater Blvd. ▪ Cle Elum, WA 98922 ▪ Phone: (509) 674-7433
Western Washington Division
165 NE Juniper Street, Suite 201 ▪ Issaquah, WA 98027 ▪ Phone: (425) 392-0250
ENGINEERING & SURVEYING
XX
X
X
X
X
X
X
BR
E
M
E
R
T
O
N
A
V
E
N
E
1
BR
E
M
E
R
T
O
N
A
V
E
N
E
COVER SHEET, SITE & HORIZONTAL CONTROL PLAN
VISION HOUSE
VISION HOUSE PHASE IV
BREMERTON AVE NE
PROJECT TEAM:
SITE DATA:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
INSTRUMENTATION:
BENCHMARK:
VERTICAL DATUM:
BASIS OF BEARINGS:
HORIZONTAL DATUM:
UTILITY DISTRICT INFORMATION:
CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBILITY:
DISCREPANCIES:EXISTING UTILITY NOTE:
EARTHWORK QUANTITIES:
FIRE SPRINKLER NOTE:
VICINITY MAP
NOTES:
NORTH
SHEET INDEX
NO.NAME
1 COVER SHEET, SITE & HORIZONTAL CONTROL PLAN
2 SURFACE WATER NOTES
3 WATER & SEWER NOTES
4 TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY
5 DEMOLITION & TESC PLAN
6 TESC DETAILS
7 OVERALL GRADING PLAN
8 OVERALL DRAINAGE PLAN
9 GRADING & DRAINAGE PROFILE
10 OVERALL SEWER PLAN
11 OVERALL WATER PLAN
12 SIGNAGE, MAILBOX & CHANNELIZATION PLAN
13 TREE RETENTION-LAND CLEARING (TREE INVENTORY) PLAN
CONTRACTOR NOTES:
SETBACKS:
PARKING REQUIREMENTS:
PARKING PROPOSED
DESCRIPTION SPOTS QTY
ON-SITE PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS SURFACE:
ON-SITE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE:
OFF-SITE PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS SURFACE: