Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
WTR2700728(1)
W-728 WELL #3 - Liberty Parks-9 Rehabi.l i i.ati on Des i gn BEGINNING OF FILE FILE TITLE Re kabi Li �-atf o� �esi9/� CITY OF RENTON i k c, BID PROPOSAL AND SFECIFICATIONS W#ST1H Li Pk* $tA 1�N / �� 104)5/ INDEX Page Title Page ' Index Scope of Work ii Vicinity Map iii ' Call for Bids iv Instructions to Bidders v S Summary of Fair Practices/City of Renton vi "Certification by Proposed Contractor/Sub-contractor/Supp l ier/Ref, EEO 2 i '—certification of EEO ''Certification of Bidder's Affirmative Action Plan G '"`Non-Collusion Affidavit 5 ` *Certiflcation Re. Assignment of Antitrust claims to Purchaser 6'�'Minimum Wage Form 7 'Bid Bond Form 8 *Proposal 9 'Schedule Of Pr.ces 10 Bond to the City of Renton 2 11 contract Agreement - — 1S nvirormental Regulation Listing 16 C°ont rec4s-Other,ThaA.Faderrl-Aid FNWA ? 17 _ Emplojment Utilization Report 18 _. SPecial Provisions 25 'Technical Specifications 26 Project Plans Attached Documents marked • above must be executed by the Contractor. President and vice-President or Secreta p if Corporation by-laws permit, All pages must be signed. In event another person has been duly authorized to execute contracts, a copy of the corporation minutes establishing this authority must be attached to the Bid Oocume.,t. City of Renton Public Worts Department Renton, ishington 98055 Li Scope of Work The City of Rerton's existing Well M3 facility consists of a 100 horsepower vertical turbine pump, housed in an underground concrete structure. All electrical gear and piping are also underground. The City wishes to reconstruct the facility to house all equipment in an above grade structure using the original concrete structure- as the foundation. The Scope of Work of this Contract includes: Construct new above grade building. Install the well pump and motor refurbished by others under separate contract. Install pipe for rump discharge including drilling existing vault roof to reconnect to existing piping. Install electrical equipment in new building. Fill existing underground vault with pea gravel. Construct concrete driveway for truck access to building. SCOPE OF WORK Renton - Fair Practices Policy Affirmative Action Program Instructions to Bidders Call for Bids E.E. 0. Certification, etc. Bid Bond Proposal Schedule of Prices Contract General Provisions Special Provisions _-- _ _ __. _...�Iai//+tr.ic __d✓Caw nTr/NG n��h-G cxrsT+e�__"__ __ _._. .. 4/G �l 'lev//� p'peYn lS vHe� G1y /Y/i' /s/ /3 S'�• r n r^ ter i!T'.•/pr _ '^a • �^- � — �°� ' �= .^Syry ir ,_,. �n 1� VP/t 4v" ILh/G �• �n S*.r l � I � J � i I /- ` Tr ec" s ca( fV mlofJ ,'It i 'ra �.w'1 ark �l+^f1:a�:H�. T/'2 ^onnn�M t'�:Y SRA /1 Cl //•• r�v.v Sv�. i•� RCCfSS i.I�.,v:>� "yOlir .�.Ns`Ysi �iN N. "�:✓S + J:^ "'i. � 1.'i�f.•.rr 4 "�? tiLc' r3+iX -AIV A. _'X Min'," f7a1Y/cl... n/O„lrsl /J'>�r M.: ^.i .. •%'�:f/� I+I '1 JY wi �wn _ �D N!?j WA / r.+• l' r v r S ..r -j l ,t, I � J 3. ✓3 v IZ G'�:i '�'u Syvv c+-.ion Nor'sS ors P !ar � Q A/•GK Cri �.f�f/'a iVf ?"� O%' G AP 'I ;>L /!q• e'Jr ar= Ir7.7 /•-0�=-./ 7y16 :. ,^_�a �., r C,i'r J �• /.... � /Fr a yay l�,'f;r. ✓3 � '� /'.:>- '� / .. C _ • ,BLS ' /" l , orr.i t ~sl.rn{c haa! Pro..s 6 co. ft .,, ih if,C fPc. S /%n.y RGfglr anGr �ra Ml.� �'% a� /1u fh5� 4w e [c•w"�5 a f" Thrn,o< /re✓ 777 os snr �nc +t/ .� -.'%finely/ IJIy/„n// /arc'✓ve7S F CC, 3 t3 -tb S*. n1l�..w a- Qom'/_ 3 3 /6 6A ex1s....✓ litwson� y - C0.' '-�Pe fiA. // " Sg - �f- L'St /,,,r,. /i re s5- re S�r:� P�/;//I•c IV 04 ye Nle ns frr/ri �,r. �1 Oft r.•r fit,.+..� �� rr.. i.r.:/ STS - C2 4. Floor Covering Provide Torginol Duresque seamless floor covering over concrete slab except under pump heads and electrical W4l. Covering to be equivalent to that manufactured by To-gino of America and shall consist of 2 component polyurethane liq-td binder with colored chips. Chips shall be a colorfast inert water insoluble mixture of 2 parts Eggshell White 3012 to 1 part Fawn 3014 providing Torginol color and pattern equal to No. 1014. Install floor covering in strict accordance with the manufacturer's speci- fications and the following requirements: Provide 6 finish coats with mini^um thickness of covering to be 1/16". Protect all other surfaces during installation. Protect finished covering from damage. Repair any damage at no cost to "weer. 5. Accessories (1) Ventilating System - Provide therostat controlled roof mounted exhaust far. and motorized louver as indicated on the electrical plan and conforming to following: Far,: Pace CRE-18 or equivalent. Curb mounted with multi leaf gravity back damper within curb. V-Bel- drive with adjustable pulley. P,i-ter-in-shear vibrator isolators. Integral self-resetting overload protection. Safety disconnect on far. unit. A.MCA Certified Perfomance 3000 cfm at 1" of water static 1600 fpm outlet velocity 1.5 `.p 460 volt, 3 phase, 1750 rpm motor Motorised Louver: Construction Specialities 4" Model 4830E or equivalent Frame and Blades 60617 alloy 0.81" thick Motor - 110V single phase factory Mounted for 2-position operation. No bird screen or finish required. Mounting Hoods: Pa,x Skycap or equivalent Equip wi'h tiri screen Sule'* availatle colors for selection C. BUILDING 1. Scope: This section covers the construction of/brick building with eree*weeeed concrete roof to house the pumping facilities *m4-44t*r*-t1rIOTTn tion F"eWiGier— -O_W-M% 2. Concrete: (See Notes on Structure Plan) Concrete work shall conform to ACI 301-72 (revised 1975) and the following supplemer.;al requirements. ft roof slab . 4000 psi - - ft other concrete . 39W psi - Concrete shall be proportioned for minimum shrinkage, shall have a water reducing admixture "Plastiment" or "Pozzolith" added in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations and shall contain 3-60�. entrained air. Type III cement may be used. t . Formed surfaces shall have a smooth fom finish. �.. .r Roof slab fascia and soffit outside wdlIs shall have a smooth rubbed finish. Roof and floor slams shall have a trowelled finish. Reinforced Hollow Unit Masonry: b' ' �Tp J'i�i•= ,e. t Hollow masonry clay, units shall be "Kla-All" the as manufactured by Mutual Materials Co. complying with ASTM C652-HM-SW as modified by ICBO research approval 127-0 for hollow brick grade 1, type 1, Color to be selected by Engineer upon submission of brick samples. fin! 1'' .'•' Mortar shall be type S and shall be tinted to match brick color. b All joints shall be tooled, making solid, smooth, watertight compacted joints. Exterior joints shall be weather joints. Interior joints shall be concave joints. At the completion of the work, all holes or defective mortar joints shall be pointed. Where necessary defective joints shall be cut out and repointed. Exposed masonry shall be protected against staining from wall grouting or other sources and excess mortar shall be cleaned off the surfaces as the work pro,•,resses. At the completion of the work all exposed masonry shall be clear.. in the event ordinan- cleaning is not adequate, special methods such as sand blasting and chipping mast be used to clean the surface. All waste and surplus masonry materials shall be removed from the job, and all stairs or dirt from this operation affecting other materials adjacent sr all be cleaned satisfactorily. $IS . C3 (2) Doors: Provide two hollow metal door-, one with louver in upper portior, conforming to the following specifications: Frames - Per Steel Door Institute SDI 100 with reinforcement and cutouts for hardware per SDI 107. Doors - Type II, Style 2 per SDI 100; chlorinator door to have louver door. Hardware - Lock - Best aat--hing Owner Existing Standard Stop - Rusevin 153J Threshhold - Pemko 173A f" Weatherstripping - Pemko Neoprene Tape Door Bottom - Pemko 216 Av yr Keys - T.nitial, Convactors own, Lettering - 2" Black (match Talbot Hill Reservoir Utility Bldg.) City of Renton Talbot Hill Booster Pump Station c Manufacturers - Republic Steel, Steelcraft Manufacturing, �` •\^ Penestra, Ceco Corporation or approved equivalent V Shop Drawings - Submit for review prior to ary fabrication. (3) Grating: Provide aluminum grating floor over suction well area of pump station per plan. Grating to be Kerrigon weld forged KP-900 (1-3/4" x 3/16") or approved equivalent. Provide fasteners to secure panel to framing members. (4) Ladders: rurnish and install ladder from suction well level to pump level, conforming to OSHA regulations. � �l'O��✓C /ICY J� J'MVD�h TOYPIS ..�yA Ilq.�'f jt�i Ml3 � �TGY �ET'M ry1k Ll JFf�G�S .nel /Pwle.� • c, 5. ELECTRICAL • TP-11r _ r� A. General G 1) Work under this Sect'.on will be handled s a sub-c�ract under the General Contract for the entire structure. Cooperate with General Contractor in every respect for completion of project, make certain that all surrounding work is ready before starting, and properly protect and coordinate with other work during construction. 2) Definitions All terms according to AIA, IES and IEEE Standard Definitions. 3) Drawings, etc. Plans and Specifications: Specifications, with plans, are intended to cover installation of electrical equipment. Materials shown and called for on plans, but not mentioned in specifications or vice versa, necessary for proper completion and operation of equipment, furnished same as if called for in both. 6) Codes, Permits L inspection Obtain permits, pay fees required by government agencies having jurisdiction over this work. Install work in accordance with Washington State Electrical Code. On completion of work, furnish satisfactory evidence to show all work 4^stalled in accordance with codes. 5) Shop Drawings Submit drawinos on panels, controls and fixtures. Obtain apprnval before manufacture. 6. Installation a) Cutting and Patching Do all cutting and patching required for installation of work. Do all cutting carefully to prevent damage to work of other trades. Use mechanics skilled in trades involved. Cutting and patching subject to approval by Engineer. b) Tests Test all wiring connections for continuity. Run Megger tests. Repair any defects, make necessary adjustments. Check lubrica- tion of motors and direction of rotation. Make final test in presence of Engineer. TP-12 c) Guarantee Guarantee materials and workmanship for period of one year from date of final acceptance of work. Remedy, without delay or expense to Owner, any defects; provided in judgment of Engineer, sane are not result of misuse or abuse. d) Rubbish Promptly remove waste material and rubbish caused by elec- tricians. At completion of work, clean all lighting fixtures and other equipment, provided and installed under electrical sub-contract. B. Basic Materials S Methods 1) Materials, General New, best quality, free from defects and approved by Under- writers' Laboratories for purpose for which used. Eecn item same make and quality throughout building. Manufacturer's name, type or catalog number used in specifications indicates specific standards of quality and features required for this application. Other manu- facturers' units, it considered by Contractor equal in quality and similar in functi<n and construction, and if not specifically noted otherwise, may be submitted. 2) Products a) Raceways, Boxes, Fittings, 'Wire, Etc. 1) Term "Conduit": "Conduit" is considered synonymous for either rigid, IMC or PVC. Provide type of raceway specified under "Conduit Installation." 2) Rigid Conduit: Hot dip galvanized or sherardized steel - General Electric, Western, Youngstown Sheet 6 Tube Co. , Plastic Cnrlon or Western Plastics. 3) Electric Metallic Tubing: Galvanized or sherardized, same manufacture as rigid Conduit. Maximum size tubing: Z". 4) Fittings: EMT pressed steel compression-type, set screw or claw- grip, Raco or Tomic. Crimp-type not permitted. Conduit fittings threaded hubs cadmium plated or galvanized, Crouse-Hinds, Appleton or T 6 B. 5) Ou:let Saxes, Flush: Pressed steel galvanized or sherardized, Appleton, Steel City, Paco. Light outlets minimum of 4" box with fixture stud. Switch and receptacle boxes - 11" deep, 4" square. Install blank covers on all boxes not equipped with fix- or c d -'--1 r..,. ": Lure n,;!iur5 • • TP-13 6) Outlet Boxes, Exposed Below Six Feet: Cast aluminum or cast galvanized iron with tapped holes and with steel covers. 7) Wire: All wire type THW or THNN/THWN insulation. Branch circuit wire copper. Aluminum wire may be used for wire sized above ♦3/0 if proper size per NEC. All wire color coded and marked with gage, type and make on not more than 24" centers. Use Scotch tape at terminals or larger conductors to match color coding. All wire same manufacturer: Gen- eral Electric, Triangle, Southwire, Anaconda, Phelps Dodge. 8) Wall Switches: Single cote switches for lighting , 20 amps at 277 volts, Bryant 44901i Controllicg less than 800 watts, Bryant 14801-4803-4804. 9) Rece,,tacles: Duplex, I5 amps at 125 volts, grounding type. Bryant 05252. 10) Plates: Metal device plats - pressed steel �Gltl�+raareL__ b) Main Service Panel , Main Distribution, Panels, Etc. 1) Main Service Equipment: / ✓Ut'Jt' o_x > ,a.�s✓� i' irarrr�a.rYr�opN and in_overcurrent protection rated for the short circuit �Ml �ide space aaV an run meter wiring required. Provide ariepTates of all circuts. Mains for pumps with starters controls o be Square D Co,._0lass .8940, with size-5 ersing.motor stdrt&c_&ad-rlapsed_time meters. ntro —voltage is 120 volts. Main fuses type J Current 'tnire delay Gould AJT. See cant-ols sub-section C. safety switch. tnels: NEM9 breakers per schedule on drawing. Z� //VAf 1- ?40 V. Panel: Sc e 0 type QO in NEMA I enclosure. jO��yi46wvw---Wai�mouutad._-Segal-6•- Oman u - i t.y_ o '�till.i.ty.._.:1.SA, Switch with control rY hiding one line GoTt69e'sensor a�i�itYYarray�:�.sr--aae�+ecraaafe r. • • TP-14 tor, Pump Controls motor starter shall a1n: Sta rd option HOA ch and start push button. Selec switch w' pilot lights for reversing 6 name- plates n " Watt trans with CT 6 transformer. Scientifi s Type I Exceltronic 3-element Watt � Transdu for 11 volt, 5A nominal inputs, with t ImAdc ',rated put. Accu tO.2 percent for an operating tem- 1per re range of 0-5 minimum calibration adjustment + percent. The unit s rovide the output as specified r power in b_ s. del XL342K5A2. C Special Material. 1 Al P4m nnection to remote monitor, d cessitwitch. Mount receiver on sh f/bracket-at '-O . Honeywell 1W840E, OIMPMG4T �veW""Off"OOM tch and MS431C secure/access switch in FS C mounted :n gravel pocket near access 2) Light Fixtures 140 A— BG L . 3) Dehumidifier Wall mount with hose to drain, d,+u 4) Unit 'ieater F KW, M volt with built-in stat. S I 3) Installation a) Conduit Installation Rigid steel , IMC or PVC plastic conduit to be used concealed or on surfacex _ " All work shall conform to NECA Standards for Installation. b) Pump Control Connections 1) Make connection to vook pump starter s +� 2) Make connections to telemetering cabinetdENIMM2dwar ec _ gwr�Orrtransfer switch to pump ^L6.de-e4ceC-"wharrvol Loge relay senses to shut o'R wn from s -m6niL r0 relays. • • TP-15 c) Generator Sequelce / 1. Turn sele9tkk444...or on Zilp o n." (This re ses PLOP�mo & enert sws.) // �2. Re u a Val+ togdve :00.5 Sy sp4 R�elay�ll de- nerg ��3. Trapp//ster itchson Pu t Lin 6/Trnfer tc 'Ge4. Relay 2 send 1p Stops generator as pump cont V C. Electrical Services 1) Power a) General Coordinate all service requirements with Puget Power. Underground primary to pad mount 480Y/277 V. transformer. Metering facilities as required by Puget Power. b) Products Handhole/pad for transformer of size required by Pucet - Utility Vault Co. c) Installation All underground conduit and/or cable 36" below grade minimum. d) Telephone Coordinate telephone service termination point and raceway sizes with . . O � L � ' yAny sPAis pqS L Z I L v9b� OE T'u -LY ♦a�{oip tSI 1 )L 5,'1 --Lc; i7}f.•Ip N-IS061 c+ RZ 'S • I�h .V) sALICIT i•,u�GN -7 '(y,C) AZi. 2 T. S G t^1ii nF► t4.^au/ •fn/� 9 I c st '1 nos'Z 5AML6 +"4Zi s,.4 n�) s�vl oh i aao'1 nonld 6,4 Fri s,4 h2 T"4 ♦7 J$4 of 1,•A{,�'n'1 � �, y�s a-•L I c,4•F s'N�. t"y 7b vy of j 0 r PSZ r_ i S,v HL Zvi al .y-C �svnu) G s /�•y i Affidavit of Publication STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING ae- C�Dd+� $trUpp_ Gesng Orstduly swomon ................... oatn.deposiol VA Y.that.she ,,he ..•. . ,-]ter:. of THE DAILY RECORD CHRONICLE a new+pope,publbhed six 16nlmesa week.That amd neu.pper la a le[al xwnpeper and II Is flow and Iva bee. for more than sl. months prior to the dwr of publication ref,,,ed m. primed and pu hi 1s,i a Ihv Frylirh language cnnnnually as a nrw+paper published four 14,(1....,a..k in Kt nl.King Count( Washington.me It is Gyy�y y now.:ad during.11 of said I. ,was primed in an office mairtulned.1 the OEPART FS OF aforesaid ylacs of publication of sod sew.paper.Thu the Mary Record EPAR ENr O Chronicle has M-enapproseda.alegalnewspap,rbaorder.rfthv Superior PUNU��� � Court of the Count, in which it a publshed.lowiL King Count,, OF INITREST FOR CONBU.TANT OLWICES WpMRgmn Thatmeanneaad Ma.. Request..for..letters... Wall Walk m,w.p as. Ig d Nw T1lama" a Of interest. The Gay tg galtpt Walt No,9 aI10 No 9.Mt0 tnalelellpn d a rse.apse. as paper i onceed m rcssue fo wn i and aI1Oymttlrol eyewn ha tiv nit in supplement form Of eald newsDaperl once each issue for a period S� wagiw Sugar shrom F�so,a faa: Vxpxa cV g d MONO is so, oilaxw rgs 1pr d__....._ .1____.._. _._.., _. cnasnuueeusuea,commencmgon the n Wd The 0"Fr practices, 4th.dayof .._February. .1983_ andntdmgtnr and NomDtecnnu.atlon �Aec wta Daga littygya February 1y 83 .35-Mir to a date"° buthdate. swpsdlwO lneluatva,and that such newapaper was regularly distributed 1.it.sub, Lebemahs*. ttal ..ber6 during all a said period That the full •mount al the fee a,cbwa l by ate Coy d Ra man Depirram, of Plawc WoOsS charged for the foregoing pubhcat m a the sum of 930..24 S.M . Ma AggMS which Smtm. Rsnhsn.WA 9g065 firs been pion to full paper fol teof °hundred orris lodeach Ito s agand no later Man s...at fat firstmoo.ni+,ruin and per folio of one hundred word.for each wbapuent sfM3 tmenlim Ma.w E Mao- Coy Calls Pabkarwd n the OOna,Ale '.•.s��' .a{.,y^ cord ChmUa Fepruary a `1 aria 11 IM Hgay rhieP_ erk Sub+crlbed.ndawurn(obebtremrlhts lit:l .day of .February.. .It;83 ^ Nmnry Public m• r the s Washington. afdtng al1 FA"te oP KKingg County. Federal Way - Paased by the Legislature,wit,known as Senate Bill MI.effective Jude path,lei+ - Western Union Telegraph Co rules for counting words and figures, adopted by the newspapers of the Slaty .Nr n Sol Daily R""ad ChivnKie n.0.sox Ton ax auRTEn s. REMOB.Wa.9067 i MOTE Bra4 o City of Renton 5C640 There Is a t per cent Interest per month charged on past due accounts pate Description Charges 1.41 Credits I Balance Balance Forward 2/11/8? Request for for if inte est _ CERTIFICATION 30 4 I.TM( YYDr{•14YI0 DD Mf{({Y <!{\�rY UMO+{ l 0{ I1{10{Y{D Y{O[{C A.. F1 ,. �YD TM{T 1 T OY{ {YO uY,Y1D D{LItYfi Ow • TMD{ItIO TO eYTIIIYIIOpI YDO CIYTII, TO a la YYIY. • elf. >h N�rl elver{! 9223-x Affidavit of Publication City of Wnton Well Wort @ New Reap.rtry lDal..saw It STATE OF WASHINGTON utessineAT01 Ptauo KING COUNTY—SS. KS REQUESTwFOORR I.Eff Ell S of M YEREST FOR ColisutTANT SERVICES X11.i.woRK F0RR1l.E♦I.0 The undersigned, on oath states that he is An �Lj,1NEw�REet.l MEFRYypo9 :prized representative of The Daily Journal of Commerce, yts ncomua Rer n is P: l'ro. a daily newspaper, which newspaper is a legal newspaper 7 andtin.S andi—t,Lm::=sofa of general rircutanon and it is now and has been for more ?'.super:!.,-,o.�ra,o!,;.,ern than six months prior to the date of publication hereinafter for the Gt,t+:.•>, s-rp'.-.S}s tam, pmlr.'v ,I mrv., arc tha nd to, published In the English langu:,ge continuously e wtned for p�•s•••, nr as a daily newspaper in Seattle, King County, Washington, plam usd sRr<irrr.io, tnr and it is now ¢nd during all of said time was printed in an Reese project. The Carl Fair vr..�i, a„A officd maintained at the aforesaid place of publication of Noo-Disa.tir,J-.,:,,, r. this newspaper. The Daily Journal of Commerce was on the shall 'jt', . C,.. t � . , 12th day of June, 1941, approved as a legal newspaper by ts.kforada:,-- - the Superior Court of King County. teRm k ,.' ,r S—d t t w - s. The notice In the r xaet form annexed, was published In e MA, A s.R _t<,�, regular issues of The Daily Journal of Commerce,which was w Inc n I S h regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below LNNaF MOTOR. stated period. The annexed notice, a - jLTaersit bir.�uamm�:Se- Consultant Services attic• 1 I, bl:nal of Cam .__... .. ____.. ..... __.. men'.Fetrea ry a nnA le 11183, WZit-Nt. .._____.._.....,....._.. .-_ ._..__ was published on ..February 8, 14, 1983 &ibscrlbed and sworn to before tests nn February 14, 1983 _.._._._......._._.. -- .._.. _ . . ........ Notary fuel,Pv,h.to a 8u,e of wuhlftatea, rxaldma rtwa �f ournal o o merce (Pitabil.bed Inn U MYNESIA ST. (106-62211711 9EATTId.WAHR.U104 MCI -?.eb,.J4,_19.0--- City of Renton Office of City Clerk Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue So. Renton, Wa. 98055 Consultant Services 9223-H Well Work 6 New Telemetry 36 lines @ 1.00 per line 36.00 36 lines @ 90Ic per line 32.40 $68.40 epptPublished February 8, 14, 1983 011 CHARTER 116, LAWS OF 190 CITY OF RENTON CERTIFICATION a INL uN,�n.,. LD DD .1.10,ell,," Y.Dn 01 I.IVRI. \N.I I 1 Y.11N,.\L N,Vt • D11N 1Y.n�\HIO.TNL \f.ViCfl Ylrpf NtO 0. Nf DUE AND TNL CLAIM It ." DVl AND VN...D TIA., I ON ,C.,YS\ \N1 C,\. OL N[N11N. AN \NL1. 1 AN TO "ID C 1IM. I VTN[FI�iC,.tT/( 1N0 Ct.I,LT TO all.CVVY.( �/ V pCNt D: /0'} f"40 ►k..e IYeW,Aecoo,l Nubs,YItb Pqur,t of R@� PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MR _ RICHARD C HOUGHTON • DIRECTOR $' MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO RENTON WASH.90055 9 O ee 206 235-2569 �,'fO SEP't BARBARA Y. SHINPOCII MAYOR CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS REQUEST FOR LETTERS OF INTEREST FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES The City of Renton is proposing reconstruction of Wells No. 3 and No. 5. and Installation of a new supervisory control system for the City Water Supply System. Professional services are requested for preparation of plans and specifications for these projects. The City's Fair Practices and Non-Discrimination Policies shall apply. Contact Public Works Department, 235-2631, for a detailed Scope of Work. Letters of Interest must be received by the City of Renton Department of Public Works, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055, no later than March 1st. 1983. Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk Published: Record Chronicler February 4, 1983 February 11, 1983 Daily Journal of February 7, 1983 Commerce: February 14, 1983 OF RED � T z PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT RiCHARO C HOUGHTON • DIRECTOR ✓g MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE SO. RENTON.WASH.99055 206 235-2569 P 041rfo SEetE E BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH February 15, 1963 MAYOR WELL NO. 3 AND WELL NO. 5 REHABILITATION WATER SYSTEM SUPERVISORY CONTROL SYSTEM REPLACEMENT PROFESSIONAL DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES PROJECT OUTLINE Design Engineering, Water Quality Analysis, Construction Management and Inspection Services dre requested for three water system projects; Well No. 3, Well No. 5 and electrical system design and bidding docu- ments for total replacement of the Water System Supervisory Telemetry Control. These water system improvements will be handled as three separate pro- fessional services contracts with project descriptions and Scope of Work as follows: 1. WELL NO_3 This well lies in the north corner of Liberty Park near City Hall and has an underground well house. The proposed project improvements include construction of an above-ground structure and replacement of the existing motor control center in the new above-ground structure. Primary professional services are: structural design, electrical control design, specification pre- paration, bid evaluation, construction inspection and manage- ment and project startup. 2. WELL NO. 5 This well lies in the Renton Kennydale neighborhood, just east of I-405 at the intersection of N.E. 24th Street and Jones Ave. N.E. The well has been rated at 1,600 gpm; however, because of suspt. ted sand and iron problems, it has been inactive for six years. An investigation of the well's sand and iron problems, together with the various solutions, is needed. If the well can be economically rehabilitated, plans and specifications for re- construction of this well may be prepared. Primary Professional Services are: Well screen and casing ana- lysis, ground water quality investigation, preliminary engineer- ing report on feasibility of well reconstruction, Structural design, electrical control design, specification preparation, bid evaluation, construction inspection and management and project startup. SCOPE OF WORK - 2 - February 15, 1983 3. WATER SYSTEM SUPERVISORY CONTROL - TELEMETRY SYSTEM REPLACEMENT The City water system is presently operated by an old "Systems Control" brand electro-mechanical' telemetry system and some tone telemetry equipment. This system controls the operation of our four wells, nine pump stations and six water storage facilities. A new telemetry system to replace the existing obsolete equip- ment is needed, with capability to be expanded for more detailed system operation and monitoring. Primary Professional Services are: Engineering report on system design, equipment selection, specification preparation, bid evalua- tion, construction inspection and management and project startup. The three Professional Services projects may be applied for separately or in any combination by interested professional services finis. Interested professional services fi ms must provide in a Letter of Interest: a. Experience with past e"ojects of similar nature listing dates and personnel involved. b. Personnel assignment and over-all experience, together with specific experiences relevant to this project. c. Sub-Consultants, if any. d. Availability of the fim to begin work in April of 1983. Four copies of the Letter of Interest must be provided to the City of Renton Department of Public Works, 4th Floor, Renton Municipal Building, 200 Mill Aveo,e South, Renton, WA 93055, by March 1st, 1983. Upon submittal of Letters of Interest, the Department of Public Works will prepare a short list of Professional Services firms for the selec- tion interviews in mid-March, 1983. The final selection of the firms will be made in late March, 1983. If you have any questions, please contact Bob Bergstrom, Engineering Supervisor, City of Renton, 735-2631. Attachments: Hydraulic Profile Wells No. 3 and No. 5 History WELLS NO. 3 d 5 HISTORY Liberty Fork Well No 3 This wall r.. drilled.. Test Wall No. 2 in October 1959 by Gaudio Drilling Company of Tacoma. Washington.. The well has a 12.inch casing for the full depth of the well which was 105 feet deep from oripnal ground surface. The casing is perforated from 65 feet to 80 feet depth. which corresponds very closely with the perforations in Wells Nos. 1 and 2 An undated note appears in the City files that the well was pumped at "0 gpm f^r about 30 minutes, but the test was abandoned because of traffic hindrance and flooding h...to.. The few drawdown read- up indicated . spei,fic ytold probably 500 gpm per foot of drewdown. The permanent well w.. equipped with a 12nnch pump and 100hor.e- power electric motor by V August 1902. The equipment to housed in a large u MergrouM vault built by United Contractor. of Seattle The well was oper.teo in 1962 for three contuuous hours n 1,645 gpm with.dr.rdow.of 3 feel Water temperature was 51 degree.. An entry appears on the .ppltution for permit to extract groundwater that the cuing has a sc reen from 60 to 66 fset. This has not be confirmed from any other records Well No 5. A to V.well was drilled by Layne.Pacitic. Inc.. in May 1952 to a depth of 359 feet and the present producing well was drilled in the same location by Jansen Drilling Co . in 1953 to a depth of 388 het, Specifmatione for drilling the well are on fie with correspondence on the contract work which included furnishing and installing pumping equipment and guaranteeing production of at least 600 gpm with additional payment up to 1.300 gpm. The pump acceptance test was conducted on 24 September 1953 and field data to on file It was concluded that the well and equipment would produce 1.300 gpm of saW-free water. An analysis of a water sample dated 30 September 1953 which indicates 43.2 part. per million(ppinl of .ilica and 0.09 ppm of iron a uclud.d in this Appendix Thee amount. are not sac e&@tv.. The well is equippedwith two sections of well screen. but it appears that it must have been producing sand in 1959 because testa were run in January 1959 to es..a. the and content which was noted&@ being considerable. At this time the static level after standing wernigrt from ads p-m. res 148 feet. The well was dr.wn down to about 230 fast. There a record of the well being continuowly pumped for 8 hour, on 24 September 1953 at 1.132 gpm with e> feet dr.wdown from 135 feet list, level. The quality of water presently produced by this well is not good. Complaint. are received the, the water smells badly aW has a high von content. The well also pump- *end_ It was used for auoply to June and July 19bS. but only at times of heavy dsma d on the system or in emergency. The City file .water right .1 I.300 gpm at this well Work was done on the well some time after October 1959 by Gaudio Drilling Company who added gravel to tine well followed by eurging.rid dev.lopment The well stopped pumping sand for . Short it". but the improvement apparently did not last. The well log indicates a stratum of eery tote *arid and it is possible that it could be operated at reduced capacity. but this would not improve the bad t.1te of the water. • CITY OF RENTON • Plan Holders List SCOPE Of WORK PROJECT: Wells -3 and =5 BID DATE: PRICE: PLACE: 4TH Floor Conference Rm. TIME: AMOUNTAT<^ �—UTE CHI NAME PAID ISSUED RETURNED REFUNDED 1 Collie Martin CH2M Hill --- 1500 - 114th Ave. S.E. Bellevue, WA 98004 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2. Weedens Consultants _ 15539 N.E. 13th Place Bellevue, WA 98007 747-5343 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Oou. Jacobsen Hammond. Collier, Wade-Livingstone 4010 5tonewar North -Seattle, WA. W1.03 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4—_. ME, Stettler _liLrt Crowser 1910 Fairview we. East .Seattle. WA. •98102• • • . . . . 324:953D . . 5_ Linda Hawley Cult. Wesrer, Cull) P.O. Box 418 _ Cameron Park, CA 95682 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . f, BOB 1100 Eastlake Ave E, Seattle. WA 98109 Paul Gilligan 682-9000 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • CITY OF RENTON • Plan Holders List PROJECT: Wells =3 and -5 BID DATE: PRICE: PLACE: 4TH Floor Conference Rm. TIME: AMOUNT DATE DATE PLANS E CHE K NAmE PAID ISSUED RETURNED REFUNDED 7. Mr. Azzam Shannon & Wilson P.O. Box C-30313 Seattle, WA 98103 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8. Poole Engineering. Inc. 2950 Northrup Way Bellevue. WA 93004 _ Attn: Mr. Gorgon Johnson 878-4304 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Hazier Engineering 2930 Richards Road S.E. Bellevue. WA 98005 Attn: Rick Gilmore . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10. 'Westin Control Consultants, Inc. Suite 243 - 3150 Almaden Expressway San Jose, CA 95118 Attn: Mr. Richard Tinnons 408)269-6600 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11, Geological Consulting Services 16140 Agate Pass Road Bainbridge, Island, WA 98110 Attn: Mr. Will Thomas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12, N. G. Jacobson _ 414 Skinner Building_, Seattle, WA 98101 _ Attn Mr. Bob Leava7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • CITY OF RENTON • Plan Holders List PROJECT: Wells No. 3 and No. 5 8 Water System Supervisory Control BID DATE: Telemetry System Replacement — - PRICE: PLACE: 4TH Floor Conference Rm. TIME: NAME PAID ISSUED UF-RETURRAAp AARE FRONDED 13. Mr. Richard Nord H.G.E. Engineers 375 Park Avenue Coos Sav Oregon 97420 _ 14. Kramer, Chinn 8 Mayo 1917 - 1st Avenue Seattle, WA 98101 Attn: Mr. Roy Geiselman . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15. Dave lnrhim Bell Walker Fnyineerc 2563 - 75 nd AP. 11.e S itp c _ Redmond WA g80_52 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88 3•-3 6 7 6 . . . . . 16. R. W. Beck 8 Associates 200 Tower Bldg —7th R nl iye cr — Seatr;e. WA 98inj Att : Allan Rushipy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 622-5DAo. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . GARDNER ENGINEERS, INC. """""^" 11 ma yr e"^eM 1.lake.I.F CONSULTING ENGINEERS/SURVEYORS•SINCE 166.1 moms.v.numam v.l 28 February 1983 Mr. Richard C. Houghton, Director Department of Public Works City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton Washington 98055 Re: sell No. 3, etc. Dear Mr. Houghton: Gardner Engineers wishes to express its interest in providing the above professional service. Our understanding of and background for the three projects is as follows: Well No. 3 This is a straight forward pump station design project. Consideration must be given to the detail of extending the well casino for sanitary protection, using the existing structure for the new building foundation and visual impact of the above ground building, a. Similar Projects by Gardner Engineers: Recent projects using vertical turbine pumps. Water District No. 81, N.E. 85th Pump Station 2 - pumps 8.000 GPM each Project Manager Mort Thomas Designer Peg Staeheli Site B Landscape Designer Peg Staeheli Electrical Enoineer Travis. Fitzmaurice 8 Assoc. Inc. Water District No. 81, North Tank Pump Station. 1981 1 - 2,500 GPM Npp Project Manager Jack Locke Designer Peg Staeheli Electrical Engineer Travis. Fitzmaurice 6 Assoc. Inc. SUITE 241 • MARKET PLACE ONE 2001 Western Avenue • Seanle,W'ashmaton 9ai m 0%)621-S26i Mr. Richard C. Houghton, Director 28 February 1983 Page two Cherokee Bay Park Booster Pump Station - 1982 3 - Pumps, 1,500 GPM total capacity Project Manager Mort Thomas Designer Peg Staeheli Electrical Engineer Travis, Fitzmaurice 6 Assoc. Inc. City of Renton Talbot Hill Pump Station, 1978 4 - Pumps, 5,000 GPM Total Capacity Project Manager Mort Thomas Electrical Engineer Travis, Fitzmaurice 8 Assoc. Inc. Water District No. 20 Joint Facility Pump Station, 1976 3 Pumps 9,600 GPM Capacity Project Manager Mort Thomas Designer Jack Locke Electrical Engineer Travis, Fitzmaurice 8 Assoc. Inc. b. Personnrl Assignments - Gardner Project Manager Mort Thomas Designer Peg Staeheli Landscape Peg Staeheli See the above list of similar projects for soezific, relevant experience. Mr. Thomas has been in charge r Gardner Engineers' design since 1961, including nine other pump stations. Ms. Staeheli has been with Gardner for four years. She is a graduate Landscape Architect. Presently she is carrying out all design for Water District No. 81, serving over 5,600 customers. She has also designed domestic supply and irrigation system for four (4) King or Snohomish County Parks. Sub-consultants Electrical Travis, Fitzmaurice 8 Assoc. Inc. They have done all electrical design for Gardner Engineers since 1957. Mr. Richard C. Houghton, Director 28 February 1983 Page three Structural H.K. Kim E Associates. Mr. Kim is a minority business enterprise, specializing in small building design of other design professionals. He is presently working On two projects with Gardner. d. Availability to begin work Our present work load for utilities includes Water District No. 81 Transmission Lines, design completed; and the Water District No. 81 Pump Station design, scheduled for completion March 15. The personnel listed above will be available for April work. Well No. 5 This is a project divided into two phases. First is the investigation and analysis of feasibility of returning the well to service. Intially we would ut`.lize the services of Robinson 8 Noble, ground water geologists, to survey the well (T. V. inspection) and carry out test pumping. If they are able to develop solutions to these problems then the quality (taste, odor) problems can be addressed. If solutions to these problems are economically feasible then the second phase of project is straight forward design, similar to the Well No. 3 work. a. Similar Projects by Gardner Engineers; Cherokee Bay Community Club - 1982. 3 wells 250-300 GPM each. Project Manager Mort Thomas Sub-Consultant Robinson 8 Noble Wells had excessive turbidity, iron and manganese. Robinson 6 Noble's solution of perforating casing at strategic points reduced turbidity which in turn brought iron and manganese eithir allowable tolerance. Water Cistrict No. 94 - 1981. Existing Well - increased from 70 GPM to 350 GPM capacity. Project Manager Mort Thomas Sub-Consultant Robinson 6 Noble Rapid growth required upgraoinq of 70 GPM well to 250 - 350 GPM out- put. Increased rate caused excessive turbidity, iron, and manganese. Robinson 8 Noble super- vised re-development to correct problems. Mr. Richard C. Houghton, Director 28 February 1983 Page four Ocean Bay Water Co. 1981. Private Water Company at Long Beach, Pacific County. Project Manager Mort Thomas Gardner Engineers supervised testing of three existing •ells by H. 0. Meyer Drilling Co. and prepared Comprehensive Source Report for D.S.H.S. Project will include three additional wells, storage and chlorination. For the Seco❑d Phase work the projects listed for Well #3 are similar to the requirement. for Well 05. b. Personnal Assignments - Gardner Phase I Project Manager Mort Thomas Phase II project Manager Mort Thomas Designer Peg Staeheli Site d Landscape Design Pea Staeheli Refer to Well 03, Section b. for experience. c. Sub-Consultants Phase 1 Ground Water Geoloqists Robinson 6 Noble John Noble Mike Krautkramer Water Quality Howard Edde, P.E. Phase It Electrical Engineer Travis, Fitzmaurice E Assoc. Inc. Structural Enoineer H.K. Kim 6 Associates d. Availability Refer to Section 1. for Well 03. Water Supervisory Control - Telemetry System Replacement. This work will be carried out in two phases - A Report and A Design Construction Phase. Mr. Richard C. Houghton, Director 28 February 1983 Page five The City has an operational control system that is badly outdated and cannot realistically be built on. Newer "state of the art" equipment is not only more functional but can expand the scope of usefulness of the system. All work will be carried out by Gardner personnel , with an electrical engineering consultant and, if required, a computer application consultant. a. Similar project Water District No. 81. 1970 to 1983 Project Manager Jack Locke Gardner has had an ongoing responsibility for this system for thirteen years. It was upgraded once and will again be revised this year to accommodate a major pump generator station. This system4as originally designed by Gardner Engineers in 1970 as a part of a major system expansion. The telemetry was furnished by I.L.I. and included Foxboro Strip Chart Recorders (fold out). Innovative features of the system include summing of flows from four meters, a flow controller, and modulating valve. The 1980 assignment was to add a new pumpir station and reservoir to the system. In addition, the meter trans- mitters were not reliable and maintenance was costly. Our proposal to install a new system, but to utilize the exist- ing recorders, flow controller, tone units and other equip- ment,as appropriate. The contractor was required to assume system responsibility and to recondition retained equipment. After the 1983 improvements the system will monitor and/ or control the following: 11 Flow Meters 3 Pumping Stations (8 Pumps) 2 Reservoirs 2 Automatic Valve Stations Flow Control , Alarms, and Meter Summing 4 Pressure Recorders Water District No. 20, 1975 Project Manager Jack Locke New telemetry system. The system was designed in con- junction with a reservoir and pumping station. Mr. Richard C. Houghton, Director 78 February 1983 Page six The system includes remote control of three variable speed pumps with flow control to preprogrammed pumping rates from 0 - 9000 GPM. Reservoir level,two pressure record- ers, two meter stations and automatic valve station. The system was on line as planned and has functioned as planned without any major maintenance or adjustments. City of Bellevue, 1970 Project Manager Jack Locke The project was designed to replace the existing equip- ment at five of the City's pumping stations and to add recording and control to five meter valve stations. Work included reconnection of existing functions and new additions. In addition to monitoring and record- i..g, the system has a major control element. c. Personnel Assignments - Gardner Project Manager Port Thomas Project Engineer Jack Locke Designer Peg Staeheli Mr. Locke is a principal of Gardner Engineers and has been with the firm for fourteen years. He has been responsible for all control and telemetry design. Prior to joining Gardner he was with the firm of Richard E. Wolff. c. Sub-Consultant Electrical Engineer Travis, Fitzmaurice d Assoc. Inc. Computer Application David R. Tibbot d. Availability of Personnel Mr. Locke is presently completing the Comprehensive Plan and a Telemetry Project for Water District No. 81. He will be available after March 15 for this work. Mr. Richard C. Houghton, Director 28 Fe„ruary 1983 Page seven We wish to emphasize that on all projects listed in this letter, we Will have available for your work, the key personnel named above. We also emphasize that we provide complete service through Contract Administration, Construction Inspection and Facility Start-up. Finally our people have worked in the City of Renton and we are familiar with your system, standards and operation methods. Very truly yours, GARDNER ENGINEERS, INC. Mortimer H. Thomas, P.E. Principal MHT/bet OF RFC 4 "4 z PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT DESIGN/UTILITY ENGINEERING 0 235-2631 MUNILIPALRUILOING 200 MILL AVE.50. RENTON,WASK 98n55 09 e P �q„ro SE Pt EM.OE' BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR MEMORANDUM Date: April il, 1983 To: Dick Houjhton From: Bob Bergstrom Subject: Well No. 3, Well No. 5, Telemetry Professional Services I am recommending the following firms to be interviewed for the three professional services contracts for Wells No. 3 and 5 and the water telemetry system replacement. My recommended short list Is: Telemetry Well No_5 Well No. 3 CH2H-Hill R. W. Belk Biaizer Engineering RH2 CH2M-Hill Gardner Engineers Bell-Walker Westin Control (Calif.) Hart-Crouser Williams-Roth HCWL Engineers Please feel free to review the attached rating sheets. Upon your approval cf this short list, I will schedule interview dates for our selection cornittee made up of Ron Olsen, Mike Mulcahy, John Ra:ston and myself for in person interviews. '7 Li/_ __------ Approved: aft Y` Wells No3 and No,_5 6 Telemetry Short List Ranking Well Ito.. 3 Well No. 5 Williams 6 Roth 30 Hart-Crouser 35 Bell-Walker 30 CH2M-Hill 34 Ga 30 R. W. Beck 34 HCW, 30 N. G. Jacobsen 26 Blaizer 30 Shannon-Wilson 25 R. W. Beck 28 Bell-Walker 24 G. Jacobsen 25 Gardner 24 HGE 12 HCWL 24 RH2 '5 Blaizer 24 Williams-Roth 24 Geologic Consulting 23 HGE 22 RH2 12 relenrtry RH2 J1 CH214-Hill 31 Westin Control 30 Gulp/Weisner/Culp 29 llsl 29 N. G. Jacobsen 27 HGE 22 Gardner 22 R. W. Reck 22 Williams 6 Roth 22 Blaizer 22 OF Rf PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT _ DESIGN/UTILITY ENGINEERING 0 235-2631 =r 9� 1Q MUNICIPAL BUILDING 100 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON.WASIL 98055 rca St att•oP SARBARA Y. SHINPQCH MANOR MEMORANDUM Date: April 11, 1983 To: Mike Mulcahy, Finance Director Nor 31sen, Utility L'ngineer .n Ralston, Electronics Supervisor From: Bob Bergstrom, Cngineerir„ Supervisor Subject: Well No. 3, Well No 5, Water System Telemetry Here is our Start list for t'.e three jobs. I am setting up interviews of one hour each next wee and the week of April 25th - 29th. TELEMETRY WELL NO. 5 WELL NO`3 WELL NO. 3 Friday, April 22nd Thursday.April 21st Monday, Tuesda 9:00 a.m, 9:00 a.m. Apr 26il April th 10:00 a.m. 10:00 a.m, 9:00 a.m. 1:30 p.m, 11:00 a.m. 10:00 a.m. 2:30 p.m, 11:00 a.m. Check if this schneduuljey�is O.K. Please let me know, jft Attachments OF Rp y l� i`i } i PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT DESIGN/UTILITY ENGINEERING 0 235-2631 0 IR MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH.88055 I"R 9 b P ,AEG SE Pt E"� BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR April 11, 1983 Gardner Engineers Suite 241 - Market Place One 2001 Western Avenue Seattle, WA 98121 Subject: Professional Services Proposals: Well No. 3, Well No. 5, Telemetry Gentlemen: Your firm has been selected for further In-person inter- views on the following project(s): Well No. 3 We will be scheduling interviews for the weeks of April 18-22 and April 25-29• Please call our office and ask for Jean Truman to establish your Interview date and time. Thank youl Cordially, Robert E. Bergstrom, P.E. Enginee,' ,g Supervisor RF,:jft OF RE ZT SIM T PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT DESIGN/UTILITY ENGINEERING 235-2631 p 8 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON.WASH.980B6 S b �q'TFO SE Pt E'M�? BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR April 11, 1983 Bell-Walker Engineers 2463 - 152nd Ave. S.E. Suite E Redmond, WA 98052 Subject: Professional Services Proposals: Well No. 3, Well No. 5, Telemetry Gentlemen: your firm has been selected for further in-person inter- views on the following prof ect(s): Well No. 3 We will be scheduling interviews for the weeks of April 18-22 and Aprl' 25-29• Pease call our office and ask for Jean Truman to establish your interview dat. and tlmr. f Thank youl ,Cordially �� ,s I Robert F. Bergstrom, P.E. Engineering Supervisor REB:jft 1 OF RFC PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT DESIGN/UTILITY ENGINEERING 235-2631 n O 1g MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH ')BOSS 9t9I SEp1 Eoe BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR April 11, 1983 Williams S Roth 909 Kirkland Ave. Kirkland, WA 98033 Subject: Professional Services Proposals: Well No. 3, Well No. 5, Telemetry Gentlemen: Your firm has been selected for further In-person inter- views on the following project(s): Well No. 3 We will be scheduling Interviews for the weeks of April 18-22 and April 25-29• Please call our office and ask for Jean Truman to establish your Interview date and time. Thank youl Cordially, R4&9"s 7" Robert E. Bergstrom, P.E. Engineering Supervisor REB:Jft Of RFC PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT DESI(.N/UTIL ITV ENGINEERING 0 235.2631 (. � g MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH.911055 09 O' �$p �zEO SE BARBARA Y. $HINPOCH MAYOR April 11, 1983 Blaizer Engineers 2654 Richards Road S.E. Bellevue, WA 58005 Subject: Professional Services Proposals: Well No. 3. Well No. 5, Telemetry Gentlemen: I Your firm has been selected for further in-person Inter- I views on the following project(s): Well No. 3 1 We will be scheduling interviews for the weeks of April 18-22 and April 25-29• Please call our office and ask for Jean Truman to establish your interview date and time. i Thank youl Cordially, R4&go's Robert E. Bergstrom, P.E. Engineering Supervisor REB:jft OF RA, 1. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT _ DESIGN/UTILITY ENGINEERING 0 235-2631 WL >R MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON.WASH 90055 9q t 09 i rEC SF otE� BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR April 11. 1983 HOWL Engineers 4010 Stoneay N. Seattle, WA 98103 Subject: Professional Services Proposals: Well No. 3, Well No. 5, Telemetry Gentlemen: Your firm has been selected for further in-person inter- views on the following project(s): Well No. 3 We will be scheduling Interviews for the weeks of April I8-22 and April 25-29. Please call our office and ask for Jean Truman to establish your Interview date and time. Thank youl Cord rd�,ially, 4O4S 2 Robert E. Bergstrom, P.C. Engineering Supervisor REB:jft OF RF 4 z PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT t *� _ DE SIGNiUiIU Tv ENGINEERING 0 235-2631 eJ►INMUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO RENTON,WASH.90M 9 b P SEe'f'� BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR April 11. 1983 CH2N-Hill 1500 - 114th Ave. S.E. Bellevue, WA 98004 Subject. Professional Services Proposals: Well No. 3. Well No. 5, Telemetry Gent lemn: Your firm has been selected for further in-person inter- views on the following project(s): Telemetry and Well No. 5 We will be scheduling Interviews for the weeks of April 18-22 and April 25-29. Please call our office and ask for Jean Truman to establish your interview date and time. Thank youl Cordially, 'R4&0�"s 7" Robert E. Bergstrom, P.E. Engineering Supervisor REB:jft OF RFl z PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT _ DESIGN/UT41TY ENG04EER'ING 0 235-2631 0 a� I? MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200MILLAVE SO. RENTON.WASH.98055 V b P <rEO SEPTE`I'06 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR April 11, 1983 RH2 Engineering IS10 Market St. P.O. BOA 1180 Kirkland, WA 98033 Subject: Professional Services Proposals: Well No. 3, Well No. 5, Telemetry Gentlemen: Your firm has been selected for further in-person inter- views on the following project(s): Telemetry We will be scheduling Interviews for the weeks of April 18-22 and April 25-29• Please call our office and ask for Jean Truman tc establish your Interview date and time. Thank youl Cordially, ,R &qr,S 2 on Robert E. Bergstrom, P.E. Engineering Supervisor REB:jft hF RF «f 7 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT DESIGN/UTILITY ENGINEERING • 235-2631 oNLL R MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON.WASH.W055 9a b 9�rfD SEP1001 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR April 11. 1983 Westin Control Con:,,ltants 3150 Almaden Expressway Suite 243 San Jose, CA 95118 Subject: Professional Services Proposals: Well No. 3, Well No. 5. Telemetry Gentlemen: Your firm has been selected for further in-person inter- views on the following project(s): Telemetry We will be scheduling interviews for the weeks of Apr, . I8-22 and April 25-29. Please call our office and ask for Jean Truman to establish your Interview date and time. Thank youl Cordially, 1�, 4R4 s Robert E. Bergstrom, P.E. Engineering Supervisor REB:jft • pF RE+ a ."' 4 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT AM DESIGN/UTILITY ENGINEERING 0 235-2631 P JF MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO RENTON,WASH.SMS5 O9 O 0P BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR April 11, 1983 N. G. Jacobsen 414 Skinner building Seattle. NA 98101 Subject: Professional Services Proposals: Well No. 3, Well No. 5 and Telemetry Gentlemen: Your firm has not been selected for further interviews on the above projects. Thank you for your Interest In the City of Renton's projects, we would like to encourage your participation in future pro- posals. Cordially, Robert E. Bergstrom, P.E. Engineering Supervisor REB:jft I OF RFC � T �y Z PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT DESIGN/UTILITY ENGINEERING 0 235-2631 O ✓g MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE 50. RENTON,WASH.98OS5 b Y �'Co SEPIE/ BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR April 11, 1983 HGr Incorporated 19 N.M. Fifth Avenue Portland, Oregon 97209 Subject: Professional Services Proposals: Well No. 3, Well No. 5 and Telemetry Gentlemen: Your firm has not been selected for further interviews on the above projects. Thank you for your Interest In the City of Renton's projects, we would like to encourage your participation in future pro- posals. Cordially, Robert E. Bergstrom, P.E. Engineering Supervisor REB:jft OF RF1 o PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT _ DESIGN/UTILITY ENGINEERING • 235-2631 ( MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE SO RENTON.WASH.98055 e P �rED SEPLEK'0E BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR April )1. 1983 Culp/Wesner/Culp P.O. Box 518 3461 Robin Lane Cameron Park, CA 95682 Subject: Professional Services Proposals: Well No. 3, Well No. 5 and Telemetry Gentlemen: Your firm has not been selected for further Interviews on the above projects. Thank you for your Interest in the City of Renton's projects, we would like to encourage your participation in future pro- posals. Cordially, &Z&�7,SL, ', Robert E. Bergstrom, P.E. Engineering Supervisor RES:jft a OF �CE•� i �.� 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT V. DESIGN/UTILITY ENGIrIEER;NG 0 235 2631 n MAN & MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200MILLAVE $0. RENTON,WASH.OW55 rED SE PEE 8ARBARA Y. SHINP�"'H MArOR April 11, 1983 EISI 3522 W. 6overorent Way Seattle, WA 98199 Subject: Professional Services Proposals: Well No. 3, Well No. 5 and Telemetry Gentlemen: Your firm has not been selected for further Interviews m the above projects. Thank you for your Interest In the City of Renton's projects, we would like to encourage your participation In future pro- posals. Cordially, Robert E. Bergstrom, P.E. Engineering Supervisor REB:jft i OF RE. Cy •� PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT DESIGN/UTILITY ENGINEERING 0 MUN 235-26J1 9 ING 200MILLAVE SO. RENTON,WpSH.98055 4 b O EP N�fD S[pif�s0 SARSaRA Y. SHI,ti�OCH MAYOR April 11, 1983 Geological Consulting 1,140 Agate Pass Road Bainbridge Island, WA 98110 Subject: Professional Services Proposals: Well No. ), Well No. 5 and Telemetry Gentlemen: Your firm has not been selected for further Interviews on the above projects. Thank you for your Interest In the City of Renton's projecrs we Nould like to encourage your participation In future prr- , posals. Cordially, Robert E. Bergstrom, P.E. Engineering Supervisor REB:jft 1 r of R4 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT DESIGN/UTILITY ENGINEERING 0 235-26J1 kQ MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 O b' P 94'EO SEPSE yARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR April 11, 1983 Shannon s Wilson P.O. Box C-30313 Seattle, WA 98103 S ject: Professional Services Proposals: Well No. 3, Well No. 5 and Telemetry Gentlemen: Your firm has not been selected fnr further interviews on the above projects. Thank you for your Interest In the City of Renton's projects, we would like to encourage your particlpatlal in future pro- posals. Cordially, Ex Robert E. Bergstrom, P.E. Engineering Supervisor REB:jft OF RF U it 7 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT _ _ RICHARD C.HOUGHTDN • DIRECTOR i 4- JR MUNICIPAL SUILD.NO 209 MILL AVE.SO. MENTON.WASK 90055 e6 May 11, 1983 206 235-2569 �TE[i sEv�E� BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR a-fO �.lf"Af 112 138331 Honorable Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor 1 C'^; Municipal Building Renton We 98055 Subject: Professional Services Selection Process Dear Mayor Shlnpoch: Our Professional Services Interview Committee has completed their reviews of the written and oral submittals from candidate firms on design work for Well /3 Well 05, and the Utility Telemetry System. These engineering and design projects are all funded from the 1983 Utilities Current Budget or the 1983 Utilities Bond Issue. The Department of Public Works request permission to negotiate a draft scope- of-wnrk and fee amount with the number one rated firms in each project category. We will submit for review and approval the draft professional services contracts. WELL /5 WELL / 3 TELEMETRY R.W. Beck - 1ST Gardner - 1ST RH2 -1ST CP2M-Hill - 2ND HOWL - 2ND Westin - 2ND Hart-Crouser - 3RD Blalrer - 3RD CH214-Hill - 3RD Williams 6 Roth - 4TH Bell-Walker - 5TH Y^ur r,view and approval of the interview results is requested, Very J truly yours. �� Richard C. Houghton V Public Works Director A L ,Sf s Approvel C.ARDNER ENGINEEINC. d[lrlrW (OF IrM L CONSULTING;ENGINEERS IVRVEYORS•5)\Cl IM3 SUITE 241 • MARKET PLACE ONE 2W1 Western Avenue • Seattle.Washington 90121 - (206)620S265 GENTLEMEN. --- WE ARE SENDING YOU t[I Attached Under separate cover via __.___the follming items: Shop drawings ❑ Prints Plans ^ Samptes Specifications Copy of letter Change order (Mr(a OAR NO „_— o(scaenJN 77 THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: For approval Approved as submitted ❑ Ruubml__coputs for approval For your use Approved as noted '7 Subnd__copres for distribution As requested Returned for corrections ❑ Retum_co,wted prints For review and Comment FOR BIDS DUE ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS All- SIGNED. u.Mresuna.n.a•..aru.a..,rornr n n•.e• ___._._ t e e of Re+ a A PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT DESIGN/UTILITY ENGINEERING p9 Mt1NICiPAL sl11LDIND 200 WLL AVE.SO. RENTOk.MASH BBOBO 9 b P %N'ttl SE Pt F.-0 9ARWA Y. SHINPDCM MAYOR June 22, 1983 Gardner Engineers Market Place Owe Suite 241 2001 Western Ave. Seattle, WA 98121 Attention: Mr. Mort Thomas Subject: Well so. 3 Profossiowal Services Contract Dear Mort: As we discussed, per City Attorney hay grow accustcad a set of professional services contract forswts. 1 have attached a copy of the recent Morton i Deowis contract for example. When You present the design fee, we are looking for a Jump sus fee for design and a separate alternate fee for construction inspec- tion. I would like to have the contract allow us to hire you for design and add construction inspection later as we look at Our work load and please remember that the Inspection work will probably be in 1984, so estimate your labor cost accord- ingly. Cordlally, Robert E. Bergstrom, P.E. Engineering Supervisor REB:jft Attachment OF Rio PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT t. RICHARD C HOUGHTON • DIRECTOR ✓� MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE SO..BENTON.WASH.90M q, P 206 235-2569 `44rCO SE11* BARBARA Y SHINPOCH MAYOR MEMORANDUM Date: JulY I ,, 1983 To: Larry Warren, City Attorney from: Dick Houghton, P/W Director Subject: 'rofessional Services Cc. 'ract - Well No. 3 'lease review the attached professional services Contract with Sardner Engineer,, for the design of improvements to Well No. 3. Your review and comments are appreciated. REB:jft Attachment OF RFti OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY• RENTON WASI'INGTON R z .os+v�a w•.as i•o s xw snsx. • .xn+v, ..sw..c+a sws+ xss-rn i :MI p 8 LAWRENCE ! WARREN, a+••+.a.re. DANIEL KELLOGG. •sys+u.r c...,..mIz. 9Q a DAVID M.DEAN, syswr O bP Cn.nrxNn[. '91�E� SEos EMe' MARK E.BARBER. .sss•.n.c,..o.psw•. July 19, 1983 ZANETTAL FONTES. .ss,%.... ....... xsw.e. TO: Dick Houghton, Public Works Director,✓ FROM: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RE: Professional Services Contract - Well Ro. 3 Dear Dick: The above captioned contract a approved as to Legal form. Lawrence J. Warren LJW:nd CC: Kavor OF RE • ��/ L; ? PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT _ RICHARD C HOUGHTON • DIRECTOR n MUNICIPAL BUILDING AO MILL AVE.SO. RENTON.WASH.9W55 eP° 206 235 2569 TEO SEP'(vo . BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR MEMORANDUM Date: August 8, 1983 To: Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk From: Richard C. Houghton, P/W Director Subject: Weil No. 3 Professional Services Contract Please find attached t+ original contract d0Gunent5 for Gardiner Engineers' Engineering Design Services for recon- struction of Well No. 3 in Liberty Park, This project is funded by utility funds in our present budget. The City Attorney's letter of concurrence is attached. Please execute the contracts. Thonksl REB:jft Attachments INTEROFFICE CORRESPONDENCE Date August ID To: Richard C. Houghton, P/W Director FROM: Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk SUBJECT; CAG D49-83 8/9/83 Gardiner Engineers Professional Services Well 03 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (� We return herewith fully executed document(s), as above- XX I captioned, copy of which we have retained for our official public records. Copies should be forwarded to Gardiner Engineers. and the other for your file. pursuant to your memo of we return herewith documentte), as above-captioned, which have been signed by Citv Officials and need to be forwarded for further execution by We return herewith recorded document/s), as above-captioned, copy of which we have retained for our official public records. Copies should be forwarded to appropriate parties and retained as necessary for ,your files. Please file a fully executed copy with the City Clerk's office Lfor our permanent records when received. Thank you. MEM:db cc: 1 • • CAS 049-83 w7� CITY CONSULTANT AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF RENTON AND GARDNER ENGINEERS, INC. This Agreement executed this- &a day of 1983 by ano between the CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, ac trnq thro g. Ity Council , referred to hereinafter as the "CITY" and GARDNER E%ClN ERS, INC—Suite 241 Marxet Place One, Seattle. Washington 98121, referred to hereinafter as the 'CONSULTANT." WHEREPS the CITY desires to engage the CONSULTANT to vrovide Professional Services, for preparation of Contract Documents for modification of City Well No. 3. NOW, THEREFORE the parties hereto mutually aaree as fol lows: SCOPE OF WORK Task I. Investigate and sun,,arize existing facility conditions. Analyze existing structure for use in modified facility. Task 11. Prepare Design Report with Alternates and Recommendations. Review with CITY and Select Alternates. Task 111. Prepare Contract Cocument for Bid Call. Prepare Construction Cost Estimate. Task IV. Construction Services as requested by CITY. Inspect construction, administer Contract and supervise startup. Task IV. Construction Services As requested by the CITY, CONSULTANT Shall assist the CITY in the biuuina and construction processes. This requested work may include but not be limited to the following services: - Contract 4&4,,nistration - Construction Insoection - System Start-Up - System As-Builting - Construction related Engineering Services. . City Consultant Agrov • Page two SCHEDULE Complete and submit design report within thirty (30) calendar days of Notice to Proceed. Complete and submit Contract Documents within twenty-one (21) calendar Jays of Notice of Alternate Selection by CITY. Schedule for Construction Services shall be by Agreerent as required by the CITY. FEE SCHEDULE work through submission of Final Contract Documents (Tasks 1 - 3) shal 1 be paid for at a Lump Sur Fee of 313,750.00. Consultant will submit monthly invoices, including brief description of work accomplished. CITY will mate payment within thirty (30) days of receipt of invoice. Work under Task IV - Construction Services will be paid for on a reiraburseable basis at the following Fee Schedule: Through 1983 1984 Project Manager S 58.00 S 61.30 Senior Engineers 44.00 47.00 Engineer, Inspector 35.00 '8.00 Design Drafter 30.00 32.00 Drafter 25.30 27.00 Automobiles 0.25/mile 0.27/mile Services of sub-Consultants and other expenses at 1.15 times the amount billed to Consultant. SUB-CONSULTANTS The CONSULTANT wil 1 employ the followinq Sub-Consultants on this project: Travis-Fitzmaurice L Associates 'electrical Engineers H. K. Kim 3 Associates Structural Engineers NOW, THEF.t_ruki , in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants herein contained, to be kept performed and fulfilled by the respective parties hereto, and other good consideration, it is rutually agreed as follows: 1. The CITY hereby employs the CONSULTANT to perform all work in Tasks I, 11, 111 for the preparation, of the design plans de- scribed in the Scope of Work. 2. The CONSULTANT hereby accepts such employment and agrses to per- fom all of the engineering/planning services necessary to conplete the Scope of Work. City Consultant Agreement Pape three 3. a. Payment to the CONSULTANT for services shall be as set forth in the Fee Sched.:le above. b. any items the C;TY desires to add to the Scope of Kork or items not included, can be accomplished at the firm's current public works rates inclu,ed. A. The right is reserved by the CITY to .errinate or suspend tnis Agreement at any time, •^.tn or without cause, �y giving fifteen (15) days notice to r„e CONSULTANT in writino. In that event, all finished or unfinished documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, models. photographs and reports, or other material prepared by the CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreerert. shall be submitted to the CITY, and the CONSULTAV shall be entitled to receive just and equitable compensation not to exceed $13,750.00 for all satisfactory work completed on the project prior to the date of suspension or termination.. S. Neither the CITY nor the CONSULTANT shall assiqn, sublet, trans- fer, mortgage, pledge as collateral , or otherwise encumber any rights or interests accruing from this Agreement without the written consent of the other. This Agreement is binding upon the parties hereto, their heirs, successors, and legal representa- tives 6. The services under this contract and all duties incidental and necessary thereto, shall be conducted and perfcrmed diligently and competently and in accordance with professional standards of conduct and performance. 7. In all hiring or employment made possible or resulting, from this Agreement, there shall be no unlawful discrimination against any employee or applicant for employment because of sex, age, race, color, creed, national origin, marital status, or the presence of any sensory, mental or physical handicap, unless used upon a bona fide occupational qualification, and this require^ert shall apply to, but not be limited to the following: a. employment; b. advertising; c. layoff or termination; d. rates of pay or other forms of compensation; e. selection for trainin„ ina uding apprenticeship. No persons shall be denied or subjected to discrimination in receipt of the benefit of any services or activities made possible by or resulting from this Aprtecent on the grounds of sex, race, color, creed, national origin, age, except minimum age, and retirement provisions, marital status, or the presence of any sensory, mental or physical handicap. City Consultant Aaree • Page four 0YS11TANT will comply with TI City, County, State and Federal anti-discrimination laws, rules, reoulations and requirements thereof. Any violation of this orovisionsshall be considered.violation of a mat- erial provision of this Agreement and shall be grounds for cancellation, termination or suspension, in whole or in part, of the Agreement by the CITY and may result in inellcibility for `urther Anreenents with the CITY. 8. The CITY makes no conmitment and assumes no oblieations for the support of CONSULTANT't reY.vities except as set forth in this Agreement. 9. CONSULTANT is and shall be at all times durinn the term of this Agreement an independent contractor. 10. Payment by the CITY or performance by CONSULTANT shalt not be construed as a waiver of any narty's rights or remedies anainst the other!s). Failure to require full and timely nerforrance of any provision at any time shall not waive or reduce the right to insist upon complete and timely perforance of such nrovision thereafter. 11. Docu•.ents, materials, methodolony, software, lonic, and system developed under this Ar.reement whether finished or not sea11 become the pruperty of the CITY, shall be forwarded to the CITY at its request and may be used by the CITY as the CITY sees fit. 411 services nerformrd under this Aoreenent will be conducted solely for the benefit of the CITY and will not 1,> used for any other purpose without written consent of the CITY. snv i,,formation rolatino to the services will not be released without the written peroissfon of the CITY. 12. This Agreecent, tonether with attachments or addendum, renresents the entire and integrated Agreement between the oartfes hereto and suner- cedes any negotiations, representations, or anreemeets, either written or oral not incornorated herein. 13. The Consultant shall maintain Professional Liability insurance in the amour- of $1,Og0,90'1 durinr, the life of this Contract. T11 S Arreenent nay he amended only by written instrunent signed by both parties hereto, IN OItNLSS kHERLDF, the oartfes hereto have signed this Agreement on the dates indicated below: FOR GARDNER ENGINLLKS, INC. FOR THE CITY OF RUJON By BY Title _ Title Mayor Date) Date LQy1 FF3 Secretary c! Attest: City Clerk GARDNER ENGINEERS. INC. • "'^^•'^," rlw.w a c. leuurE 1 en ..1 CONSULTING ENGINEER$/SURVEYOR$.•SINCE IEB.1 tw.a.• N rnemn.n r l 6 SEPTEMBER 1983 FILE: 5140 CITY OF RENTON DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS 300 MILL AVENUE SOUTH RENTON WASHINGTON 98055 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1 AUGUST THRU 31 AUGUST 1983 WELL 03 - FACILITY SITE INSPECTION, CONSULTATION, PROJECT ORGANIZATION PROJECT ENGINEER 8 MRS @ 58.00 $ 464.00 SENIOR ENGINEER 14.5 HAS @ 44.00 638.00 ENGINEERING STAFF 3.5 HRS @ 36.00 126.00 DRAFTER 5 HRS @ 25.00 125.00 EXPENSES: TRANSPORTATION 9.50 FILM 9.90 CN4nTdt 1J." LA:YS UT 1'•. ..... TOTAL ... ... ... ... $1,372.40 CITY OF RL:VION C-RTlF1i.A;;J J nu.ony�u•e n110M �/' w so1.37 11 J372 V C 0Sl40 W 'hilt .NI • MARAEI Pt ACI ONE q all TVeslern Avenue • Seattle, N'ashrngum wf12r (m.)621.526S 1.GARDNER ENGINEERS, INC, M^n �• T ++r (ONSULTING FNGINEFRS/SURVEYORS•SINC[ iRRI 5 OCTOBEH FILE: 5140 CITY OF RENTON OCT b DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS 300 MILL AVENUE SOUTH RENTON WASHINGTON 98055 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES I SEPTEMBER THRU 30 SEPTEMBER 1983 WELL NO. 3 - PRELIMINARY DESIGN - COORDINATION WITH ELECTRICAL PRINCIPAL ENGINEER 4 MRS @ 58.00 $232.00 SENIOR ENGINEER 29.5 HRe (d 44.00 1,298.00 DRAFTER 3 MRS @ 25.00 15.00 L� TOTAL ... ... ... $1,605.00 CHARTiR llo, LAVdS Ov 1".��., "' "' CITY OF RENTON CCRT'f Y 1 PION 4,u I/i � ,. IS h,..,. ,.L `n ;to, SUITE 241 • MARKET PIACi ONE 2FR11 Wege[n Avenue • Seaule,Wa1hmRlon 9Rl21 (206)624S261, f�. GARDNER ENGI (ONSULTINC FN( 1 +M I Tlwnn o namori.. r\ 7 NOVEMBER 1983 NOV 6 1 FILE: 5140 CITY OF RENTON DEPT. OF PUBLIC PARKS 200 MILL AVENUE SOUTH RENTON WASHINGTON 98055 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1 OCTOBER THRU 31 OCTOBER 1983 WELL NO. 3 - WORK ACCOMPLI5HED: PRLLIMINARY INVESTIGATION 100s 51,500.00 DESIGN REPORT 1001, 2,500.00 P.S. E E. 33% 3,250.00 S7,250.00 LESS PREVIOUSLY PAID 2,971.40 n�(7�1 AMOUNT DUE ON THIS INVOICE 54,272.60 1 w' CHAR10 116, LAWS OF 1�N '.1 CITY OF RENTON CERTIFICATION ,1n . «\..• rvr tr YVI'r)IM�,,.11••�^N'� 1 R.l1P.. rY,. � {•.nl.Fn«r 111' � • l jai^el 1NC INr114 nNLN•\I.N ' i'si"r;L Par. nI oils. •NN r.I. I naI •Y\MOP.IfIO TO PYr MINTlfnl{ INC CINT«♦ t'\ BLIO C4.M. lr .IYNIo, -� ih4 t " 4o1/OJJ/ES.SOI 31 41 (t5) 4,272.1,;> (*SWo� SUITT 241 N MARKET PLACL ONE 2001 Western Avenue I Seattle, Wa{hmeton 98121 DESIGN REPORT CITY OF RENTON Well No. 3 Rehabilitation Problem Statement Renton Well M3 was drilled in 1959 and placed in service in 1962. The .facility consists of a line shaft vertical turbine pumps, motor starters, telemetry and various auxilliary electrical gear. All items are hosed in an under- ground concrete vault. The installation is in a level, low lying area near the Cedar River with no possibility of positive drainage of the vault. As a result the facility is subject to flooding, mainly through sump pump failure, although either pipe failure or general area flooding would be catastrophic. There is also a probler of equipment deterioration because of the ongoing damp condition within the vault. This has been recognized and partially alleviated with the installation of a dehumidifier and ventino s)sten installed which requiree drilling two 6" holes in the vault roof slab for intake-outlet vent pipes. Finally the access difficulty into the vault together with. unpleasant work- inq conditions thee, are in marked contrast with the City's recent standard well house or pump station designs. This inevitably lessens the frequency and quality of maintenance. Proposed Solutions The solution initiated by the Department of Public Works in their original Scope of Work for this project was t( construct an above grade building and move the sensitive equipment items out of the underground vault. The above grade building is the only available solution for the problens indicated above. Having incurred the expense of constructing the above grade building there is no benefit in maintaining a two level pump station, Therefore we propose to move all equipment into the aoove dr,de building and abandon the underground vault as a functional part of the Well Pump Station. The alternatives considered in this Design Report will include re-use versus new equipment items, degree of refurbishing of existing equipment, and configuration of the revised station. We will also discuss aesthetic improvement to the site, including treatment to the existing concrete block chlorinator building and Possibility of overhead wire and transformer removal. Project Alternatives 1. Building The alternatives considered for the new building were (1) build it directly over the existing vault with the vault walls serving as footings or (2) build it larger than the vault or new, separate footings if the weight of the new building is too great for the existing footings or if a larger. above grade building were required. Our st..rtural sub-consultant indicates that the vault will provide an adeouate footing for the new building. As '�ie six, of building built directly on the vault is ample alterne .e (1) will be used. The building Structure wily be brick walls with a flat Slab roof similar to recent Renton Pump Station construction. Walls will be dowelled into the vault roof slab for seismic loading. 2. vault As indicated above the vault will be abandoned as a functional part of the facility. we recommend that the floor at the sump be broken out to provide drainaoe into the ground and the vault filled with a coarse sand. 3. P�rio and Motor The motor and discharge head will be raised to the new floor level (former vault roof) by extending the well casing, pump column and shaft. The alternatives are whether to simply raise the equipment or to shop it for checking and refurbishing dur- ing this period. We recommend that the equipment be shopped and checked. Part- icularly the motor insulation. This is routine work handled by several shops in the area. The pump will be checked for wear and clearances. 4. i"11l While the pump is out the well sliould be examined by T.V. camera to detemine the condition of the screen. It also should be test pumped over a range of flows. This establishes records for comparison with the original tests and any future tests. This work should be supervised by groundwater geologists. We recommend that the firm of Nart- Crowser be used as they are now experienced with the gen- eral area of your well field. Project Alternatives (ront.) 5. Electrical, Motor Contra Is, Telemetry The present electrical components are typical construction Of that time, i.e. individual components mounted on a plywood sheet rather than a single control center such as '! now used. Examination of the equipment by our elec 'cal engineers indicates that it is in goad condi_on and quite reusable in the rehabilitated facility. We recommend that the equipment be moved "as is" with minor cleaning, checking of connections, etc. , done by .he electrical sub-contractor. The telemetry system is now under review by the City. We will proceed on the assumption of re-using the existing equipment. Changes, if desired, can be made prior to construction or new equipment car be installed later. With the exception of a new heater and lighting we basically will re-use all the existing egoionent. 6. Pipino, Valves, Meters Several piping configuration; are possible. The layout preferred both by your staff and Gardner Engineers is to cut through the floor (existing vault roof) and connect- ing to the existing piping inside the vault. This laying is contingent on being able to drill the necessary two holes in the existing slab. Our opinion is that this can be done without impairing the structural integrity of the slab. If we adapt that layout then in order t._ have the proper upstream straight pipe length for the flow meter the existino_ 8" check valve and gate valve should be replaced with short laying length items. The other piping items can be re- used. The 8" flow meter aid the 6" pump control valve should be overhauled. 7. Site Esthetic Considerations. 1) Concrete Block Chlorinator Buitdinc The small block buildir_ i, immediately adjacent to the new station. The building_ will be scre=ned both by existing ldndscaping and the new brick build- ing except on the northwest (Bronson Way) side. The building is unobstrusive from Bronson Way and we do not believe it warrants extensive physical screen- ing. We recommend painting it a color consistent with the new brick and providing additional landscaping to further screen it from Bronson Way. Project Alternatives (cont.) 2) Overhead Wiring and Transformers. The transformers for the existing well are located on a pole set at the right-of-way margin of Houser Way N. It is partially screened by existing landscaping. The ;nstallation is not overly obtrusive. The alternative to leaving the overhead transformers and wiring is to install underground service and transformers. Discussion with Puget Power indicates a preliminary estimated cost of about $8.000 for undergrounding. The existing transformers are owned by the City. At the time of the initial installation there was a significant rate advantage to berg a primary customer over a regular commercial customer with the Power Company owning the transformers. This advantage has largely disappeared. If Puget Power owned the transformers and the City was a general commerical customer then the cost of under- groundinp rould be nominal. The power rate would be slightly higher. These numbers can be determined if the City wishes to pursue it. Puget Power would like an indication of a conm,,nittment from the City before they develop detailed costs. Draft • • WELL NO. 3 REHAB. - ALTERNATIVE OPTIONS El ments 1. Pump b %W Alternate 1.) Leave pump in wall extend shaft, column b casing to raise meter. 1.A.) Take motor into shop b refurbish. Alternate 2.) Pull Dumo and motor; shoo both for check B refurbish 2.A.) T.V. well check screen etc. while pump is out 2. Controls b Telemetry Alternate 1.) Raise all equipment to new level as is l.A.) Check existing panel b replace or refurbish 1.B.) Install new M.G.C. Draft • Page 2 2.) Replace telemetry equipment with State of art equipment compatible with future planning. 3.) Replace Pcwer company overhead transformers with vault installation for esthetic improvements of site. Y' 3. Pioinq, Valves, Meter, etc. Alternate 1.) Reuse "as is" to maximum extent. 1.A.) Check & refurbish pump control valve and meter 1.B.) Replace O.S. & Y. gate valve and swing check valve with newer equipment. 2.) Connect piping to existi• in lower level by cuttin, through existing vault roof, � f Draft Page 3 2.A.) Connect piping outside by going through wall above grade and then down. Cover with brick planter, etc. or 4-I.A. below. 4. Building 1.) Same size as vault brick walls on existing conc. I.A.) Bigger than vault, brick walls on rew footings Piping egress Cl. clearance Tree cutting 1.B.) Smaller than vault using light panels if vault roof won't support brick 2.) Brick screening for block cl. building Draft • Page 4 3. ) Vaul• • Leave with access mai,tain Sump Punp 3.A. ) Vault - abandon; fill with Pit 'un. a • • ' GARDNER ENGINHURH, INC. I.d I.1+... i I CONSULTING ENGINEER SURVEYORS•SINCE IN3 T u r s,�,.,.n.•e 6 November 1983 File: 5140 City of Renton Department of Public Works 200 Milt Avenue South Rentot, Washington 98055 ATTN: Mr. Ron Olsen RE: Design Report Well 03 Rehabilitation Gentlemen: Enclosed is our Design Report for the proposed rehabilitation of Well No. 3. After examining several alternatives we concluded that there is no benefit in any partial solution, i.e. constructing an above grtde building and leaving any portion of the underground vault as an active facility. This Report addresses the options remaining after the above conclusion is reached. Very truly yours, GARDNER ENGINEERS-,, INC. Mortimer H. Thomas, D.E. Principal MH'/bet Enc. SMITE 241 • ,51ARKET PEACE ONE M Westem Avenue • Seattle.Washington 96111 (Mb)624-;.n*, w-sae IMNGINEER9. INC. Nort.ne,n T�,r t. .m wk.,r t. t ONSULTING FNC Nkt RS 7 SURVEYORS•SINCE 18M IDom..F m.mmm,v t IM 8 1°e3 5 DECEMBER 1983 FILE: 5140 CITY OF RENTON DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS 200 MILL AVENU` SOUTH RENTON WASHINGTON 98055 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1 NOVEMBER THRU 30 PDVEMBER 1983 WELL ND. 3 - WORK ACCOMPLISHED: PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION 100€ $1,500.00 DESIGN REPORT 1001 2,500.00 P.S.6E. 55€ , 5,362.50 $9,362.50 LESS PREVIOUSLY PAID 7,250.00 �dUCHARTGR 116, am Dj ON THIS INVOICE $2,112.50 CITY OF RENTON Cc RTii ':1)14 , , 4w/000jis.sot. n.41(it) 9 Z i12so (fsla 1 J acne SUITE 201 • MARI(!T PLACE ONE 2001 Western Avenue • Seattle, Washington 90,21 Ul•J 1,24 ;2n', Vd�L NO � Lac .nac wn. =mct cKYVtA tvw,t, ny�rt rwt� ,WI,.•.o�w.n .....� a 1 \Y• S flffll yWy*„ y i. psi U rL > • ^ ^• ",k �10.� '•'i mw amen K rora w t.r Kt1Kt A i `i I , rKu✓ , K-Ht« K4(AttLL FlII/lfllw ML i � ,. �'. < hl< '• .. Y O .� ! Y i1M✓a GnuiY V,WO M YI4 0 91f gnaw uY,olo omW*O wn kKys,roe .-��, �' ,� �, ate • ,� an w { • 4, , .t y r VtTN'h-140 CITY OF K.KTOK.. i �� WELL NO3 REHABJUTATIM • �ITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON S ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM FOR OFFICE USFi ONIY A. A ication No. Environmental Checklist No. PROPUSED, date: FINAL, date: Declaration of Significance 11 Declaration of Significance oDeclaration of Non-Significance Oeelaration of Non-Significance COMMENTS: . ' . - - - - - - . . - - - ' . ' - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Introduclion the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter e3.21L, RCW, requires as stand local governments, agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals. The Act also requires that an EIS be prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies Involved determine whether or no, a proposal Is such a major act on. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers, include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should Include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele. vant to the onswars you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with- out unnece Tfary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal, not just to the license for which you are currently applying Or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the Impacts which will be caused by your proposal when It is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime In the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with- out duplicating paperwork in in future. NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and local agancies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals. Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal. If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM I. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent City Of Renton PubliC Works Department 2. Address and phone number of Proponent: 200 Mill Ave. S. Renton, WA 98055 235-2631 3. Date checklist submitted December.29. 1983 e. Agency requiring Checklist City of Renton Building 6 Zoning Department 6. Name of proposal, if applicable: Well No. 3 Reconstruction 6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to Its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate enders ending of Its scope and nature): Well No. 3 is-an existing 1,500 qpm City well located in the extreme north Corn of Liberty Park. The well wi.s built in the mid-1960's in an under- ground concrete vault. Because of flooding and operational problems, the Water Utility is proposing to rebuild the well in an above-ground brick building. .r 7. Location o/ proposal (de scH De the physical setting of the proposal, as .ell as the es teat of the land area affected by any envirOnwentai Lpacts, inc ludf nq any other ia'Oreatlon no O,d t0 qua an accurate understsndtnq of the envlron- wentel setN nq of the pro Do call: Nell No_ 3 lie_;; within the Li6grty Park ComoleX in the north corner f the ygrk`Quiside of the ballfipl,15. 8. Est.watad date for cowpl,tion Of the proposal: July, 1984 9. Litt o/ all pe r,t ts, licenses or goverment approvals ragulred for the (federal, state and local--including rosones)o Proposal City of Renton Building Permit 10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity rule Led Lo or connected with this proposal? :f yes, *Aglaia: No 11. Do yaw know of any plans by others Which way affect the property covered by Your proposal? If Yes, explain: No 12. Attvch any other application forty that hat Dun co,pleted regarding the pro. POsal; if none has bun coop),tod, put Is A cis to be filed at soave future date, dr scr the the assure of such application for,: _ gne Il. L PPSLNfA: INPA,15 ;EADlanaticnt of all "yes' and "waybo' answers are req,iru) (1) Earth. oil . proposal result in: (a) unstable art" conditions or it, changes In geologic substructures? 9ES— Ri4Br X (b) D1:ruptlons, disD Lc oil?t covering of the sents, cowpactf on or over- 7 (c) [ha nqe in topography or ground surface relief fea to Watt YrS— RI�YHF X (d) The destruction, covering or wodlflcation of uy onieue geologic or phyaIcal feaeu re s? g (0) Any Increase in wind or water erosion of Sells. M— UTW Ir either on Or off the site? X TLC M TB 11� (f) Change, in in doppp011tion or erosich on Of beach tease, or Way n mud ge tfy the Chcnneldofoai rt war0 00re Street, ortthe bad at the ocean Or any bay, Wait or last? E xplanu ton: TM RMr pli— s Will the proposal result /n: ;a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air x quality? VET AAVhT Eta (b) The creation of objectionable Odors? X TE f1A UE III (C) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in clisate, either locally or regionally? A A YES AT kr Explanation: (,) water. Will the proposal result Ir: to) Changes in currents, or the course of di•vctlon of A water movements, in either mcrine or fresh WatersT t✓! wTi rTi Wu (b) Changaf In absorption rates, drainage patterns. or the rate and aeount of surface rater runoff? X ,M (c) Alterations t0 the course or flow of flood raters? A- (it) Change in the amount of surface rater I any Water body? (a) Dischargt Into surface waters, or In any alteration surfact water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? VET i7AYBE Flf (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of X ground waters? VM WMT wr (g) Change In the quantity of groan! waters, either through direct additions or Withdrawals, or tnrouyyh X Interception of an aquifer by cuts or exca va[Iowa si VET Um -' Drteriora'1on in ground rater quality, either through direct Injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, detergents, raterberne virus or bacteria, or other substances Into the ground waters? X PF3� OwGb— (I ) R^duction in the amount of water otherwise available X for public rater supplies? TM RKM my- Explanation: This is reconstruction Of Or. existing City well. (e) Flora. Will the proposal result in: (a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including treat, shrubs, grass, sops. X micruflors and aquatic Dlants)T 9Fr UV6T IES (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or X endangered species of flora? PfS' FllVSE fi5 (c) Introduction of new species of flora I-to an area, or 'n a barrier to the noreal replaniahmtht Of .XiSting ecies? X TM WE w' (d) Reduction In acreage of any ag"cula. X PET MAYBE No •r4YY."., .iu.W. ••,.s '.u:. r i 4: - ^/4. . a- • (5) Fauna. W11 the proposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversity of spacles, or numbers of any special of few na (birds, Land ♦RI ,la including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, Insects or microfauns)? X (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangs-ed species of fauna? X TIT- WrE V- (c) Introduction of new species of fauna Into an area, or result In a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? X V — N ? E (d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? �,� RAF X Explanation: I (a) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise lev.10 T- WFM Explanation: F� (7) LI ht and _glare. Will the proposal produce new light or eT Y rEA76r X (T Explanation: (e) Land Use. will the proposal result In the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? 0M WXVIT % Exptanat,on: N� (9) Natural Resources. will the proposal result in: (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? X M- -Kmr Wr (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? aM FKM ik- Explanation: (10) Risk of_.__Up_set. Does the proposal involve a risk of an ee RpToa pn or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in thr event of on accident or upset conditions? X lrf FM Wr Explanation: An above-ground well facility is safer and more reliable. (11) PR u Will the proposal alter the location, distri- SSutTTpn, Tensity, or growth rate of the human populatinv of an area? Eaulanatio n: FgDD 11T) housln9. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? _ YCS �f NO Explanation: (13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? X PES NAY? NU (b) Effects on existing perking facilities, or demand for new parking? X PET MAT1 iE N-r (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? PET Mv�g€ x (d) Alterations to p.esent patterns of circulation or X movement of people and/or goods? V MAT bE M(F (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffict X fM MAYN Its (f) Increase in traft.t hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? X 1`t1 Mqf bk X. Cxplan'tiun: (14) ' uulic Services. Will the proposal nave an effect upon, or refu7�7n a need for new or altered go re rumen cal services in any of the following areas: (a) Fire protection? __xx-�� PE3— ifAFBF MD— (b) Police protection? yy-� RT' MUN 11� (c) Scnools? X YM am (d) Parks or other recreational facili [as? v 'YET MxPBr NO (0) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? I-- Y[T RA7Tb—E NU (f) Other governmental services? TM X.. Explanation: M6� (lb) Energy. Will the proposal result in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? _ X YES NAYXE NO (b) Dcwand upon existing sources of energy, or re Quire the development of new sources of energy? X PET- RKM RT- EApJanatiun: _ (1G) ,LilL11es. Will the proposal result in a need for new systdme, ar alterations to the following utilities: (a) Power or natural gas? PFT F14�'4T ;b) Communications systems? PEr MSC xua-- w) Water? _ YES MAYNE NO • -6_ • (d) Sewer or septic tanks? X TM KATF_ Wr (e) Storm water drainage? X TET- nATeF 17>f (1) Solid waste and disposal? YEf'- MIT NO Explanation: Construction of an above-ground well facility will improve the reliability of the City water supply. W. ...n Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of �y he5lth hazard or potential health hazrrd (excluding mensal health)? R- x . G nl anatf on: _ (38) Xesthetics. Y111 the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenT vistw or vier open to the public, or will the proposal result in the erea•.ton of an aesthetigally offensive site open to public vFew? X YES NAYSE iff Explanation: The new well house will be a brick single-story building, With hrick rnlnr and pattern to match the Cedar River Park buildings. The exiting overhead Power supply will be converted to underground wiring. (19) lie crea t ion. will the proposal result in an ivpact upon the quarity oror quantity of existing recreational opportunities? X Explana tiun: The well is outside the Liberty Park baseball field and li,s in a landscape buffer area. (20) Arc h eo tog icallNis tort cal. will the proposal result in in hr eration ui a �Mcant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? XX VM _ Hir Explanation: 11). SIGNATURE 1, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla- ration of non-t iyym Ific&nce that it might its ue in r ante upon this checklist should Lhere be any rtllfyl misrepresentation or riilful lack�ooff fuull�di disclosure os ure on my put. Proponent: i,' J. ( [Signed) I Ropald L_ Olsen naN pr R GARDNER ENGINEER& INC. wr,rrrr.r a :nP,•„ P i mird I lu\e P[ CONSULTING ENGINEERS/SURVEYORS•SIN:E INJ rn�.r•,P ru P\ 4 JANUARY 1984 FILE: 5140 JAN 5 1999 CITY OF RENTON DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS 200 MILL AVENUE SOUTH RENTON WASHIWTON 98055 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1 DECFMBER THRU 31 DECEMBER 1993 WEL;. NO. 3 - WORK ACCOMPLISHED: PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION 100% $1.500.00 DESIGN REPORT 100% 2,500.00 ny P.S. E E - 90% 8r_,.04.00 $12,404.00 �D G'.',t?:;I r ., 5- .. LY PAID 9,162.50 Um CITY, r � .,AMLNT.DUE,0y THIS INVOICE $ 3,041.50 lAi , ♦rrl r.'..1l 1Jly nr llrr nl. al♦ rn.. ... ... 1.) rnllr 1.4rM, s'I +1i • ) r i�cry1 so l "1i-+ r t SUITE 241 • MARKET PLACE ONE 2001 Western Avenue • Seattle,Washington 90121 (20b)621-4AS W-728 WELL #3 - Liberty Park WTR-9 2 Rehabi on Design ti . pT BUIISNO & ZONING DEPARTME16 IN MASTER APPLICATION NOTE TO APPLICANT, Sip "11 10 0 coyrrwulr. aopllcatlm Ion, only Eho H 0 yw,r p.0lfic tyq of ppllcatlml.) we to G oe.pl.t.0. (Pl.or glnt ar tyq. Attach Waltlarrol .h. ,M if n.qq. ,.) APPLICANT TYPE OF APPLICATION NAME City of Renton, Dept. of Public Works FEES ADDR ❑ REZONE-IFRDN_ TO 1 200 Mill Ave. So. , Municipal Building ❑ SPECIAL PEWT- CITY ZIP 0 TEMPORARY PERMIT- Renton WA 98055 /�/�M CONDITIONAL USE PEAMOT- TELEPIOIE 1CyP SITE PLAN APPROVAL 235-2631 GRADING AND FILLING PERMIT No. of "Lc Vara., CONTACT PERSON VARIANCE Fra S.ctlon, NAME • JI tlfl.tlm pewit W Ron Olsen, Utility Engineer ADDRESS SUBDIVISIONS, 200 Mill Ave. So., Municipal Building M SNORT PLAT CITY ZIP ❑ TENTATIVE FIAT Renton WA 98055 ❑ PRELIMINARY PLAT TELEPHONE O TIME PLAT 235-2631 ❑ RIVER (aM.11 flcatlan R.q,.irWl OWNER NO. OF LOTS: N/AE PLAT MANE, same ADDRESS PLANED WIT DEVELOPMENT: ❑ PRELIMINARY CITY ZIP ❑ FINAL P.U.D. NAME: TESEPMONE ❑ R"Iftntlo! ❑ Inau.trlal ❑ CoN .rc Lol ❑ M1.W LOCATION NUBILE NONE PARKS; PROPERTY MOI[SS Liberty Park ❑ TENTATIVE EXISTING USE PRESENT ZONING O PRELIMINARY Park P-1 O FINAL PROPOSED USE PAIN NAME: Same NUMBER OF SPACES, Reconstruction of Well F3 _ 0 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEN COMMITTEE SO. FT. ACRES AREA, TOTAL FEES STAFF USE ONLY -- ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING DATE STAMP APPLICATION RECEIVED BY, APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE, ❑ AeepEW ❑ Ince.pl.t. Nvtlflcatlan Sent In By: IIeIttul.l DATE ROOTED ADDITIONAL MATERIAL RECEIVED BY, APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: ❑ AccptW ❑ Ires,l.l. Notifimtlm St O, By: I InitiaLl ROUTED TO, ❑ 8M11alro ❑ Dgig. Erg. ❑ Fir. ❑ ParM. ❑ Palle. ❑ P.11cy Dev. ❑ Traffic Erg. ❑ Utllitt. VISION MV ISSE Legal description of property(d more space Is required,attach a separate sheet). On file in City of Renton Dept. of Public Works A F F I D A V I T 1, Ron Dlcnn_litilities Enar. being duly sworn, declare that I am ©authorized representative to act for it.e property owner,Downer of the property Involved In this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the Information herewith submitted are In all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS J' C DAY OF 74,0a AA✓ 19 P'-/ NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, RESIDING AT 01 y I (Name of Notary Pub.4c) ( Igiu;ure of Owner) %7? �-y:� f -;)V.1 ,r �/�'f City of Renton City Hall t r (Address) (Address) (City) (State) (Zip) 235-263: _ (Telephot.a) Acceptance of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete application. Plans and other materials required to constitute a complete application are listed In the"Application Paced- :. fora 1174 0522N FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE ,pplication No(s): SA-015-84 Environmental Checklist No.: ECF-013-84 Description of Proposal: Application for site plan approval to allow the reconstruction of a municipal water supply well in a P-1 toned district. Proponent: City of Renton Public Works Department. Location of Proposal: Located in the extreme north corner of Liberty Park, south of Bronson y-ay North and west of Houser Way North. Lead Agency: City of Renton "uilding and Zoning Department This proposal was reviewed by the -RC on February B, 1984. following a presentation by Jerry Lind of the Building d Zor. .g Department. Oral comments were accepted from: James Bourasa, James Hanson, James Matthew, Roger Blaylock, Richard Houghton, David Clemens,Robert Bergstrom, Ronald Nelson, and Jerry Lind. Incorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings of the ERC on application ECF-013-84 are the following: 1. Environmental Checklist Review, prepared by: Ronald 0. Olsen, DATED December 29, 1985. 2. Applications: Site Plan Approval(SA-013-84) S. Recommendations for a declaration of non-significance: Parks 6 Recreation Department; Building 6 Zoning Department; Policy Dev6ILPment Department; Police Department; Fire Pravantiun Bureau; Design Engineering Division: Traffic Engineering Division, and Utilities Engineering Division. Acting as tlw Respovs!. - Official, the ERC has determined this development does not have a significant adve.,e impact on the environment. An EIS is not required under RCW 45.21C.030(2)(c). This uecisiun was made after review by the lead agency of a complete environmental checklist and other informatiun on file with the lead agency. Reasons for declaration of environmental nun-significance: The subject site approval for the municipal water well reconstruction will not adversely impact the environment or adjacent properties. SIGNATURES: r/ Ro nld C.Nelson David R.Clen ens BuUdkg and Zoning Director Policy Development Director C.Houghtonf) Public Works Director PUBLISHED: February 15. 1984 APPEAL DATE: February 27, 1984 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - 013 _ d4 APPLICATION No(s): SITE PLAN APPROVAL (SA-013-84) PROPONENT: CITY OF RDITON PUBLIC MARES DEPARTMENT PROJECT TITLE: WETS. NO. 4 3 Brief Description of Project: APPLICATION FOR SITE plAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A KW-IPAL VMTER SUPPLY WELL IN A P-1 ZONED DISTRICT. LOCATED IN THE EXTREME NORTH CORNER OF LIBN M PARK, SOV1H OF BRCNSON WM LOCATION: _NORTH AM WPCr nc trTtcFa Wcv n . SITE AREA: ,./A BUILDING AREA (Gross): N/A DEVELOP14ENTTCCYOVERAGE (t): N/A IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1) Topographic Changes: 2) Direct/Indirect Air Quality: x 3) Water 6 Water Courses: x 4) Plant Life: x 5) Animal Life: x 6) Noise: x 7) Light 6 Glare: I x 8) Land Use: North: COMMERCIAL East: I-405, CEDAR RIVER PARK South: LIBERTY PARK _ West: 0a\fC L'IAL Land Use Conflicts: MWR View Cbstruction: NONE 9) Natural Resources: x _ 10) Risk of Upset: x 11) Population/Employment: x 12) Number of Dwellings: x 13) Trip Ends (ITE): NONE Traffic Impacts: 14) Public Services: x 15) Energy: x 16) Utilities: x 17) Human health: EE x 18) Aesthetics: X 19) Recreation: _ x 20) Archeology/History: I X Signatures: / ✓J Ronald-G. Nelson lfevid R. Clemens Building 6 Zoning Director Policy Development Director PUBLISHED: I1IdR(L1RY 13, 1984 Richard C. Houghton APPEAL DLTE:CRY 27, 1984 Public Works Director 6-83 07mz BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING FEBRUARY 28, 1984 APPLICANT: CITY OF RENTON. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS FILE NUMBER: SA-013-84 A. SUMMARY 3 PURPOSE OF REQUEST: The applicant seeks site plan approval to allow the reconstruction of a municipal water supply well in a P-1 zoned district. B. GENERAL INFORMATION: I. Owner of Record: City of Renton 2. Applicant: City of Renton, Department of Public Works 3. Location: (Vicinity Map Attached) Located in the extreme north corner of Liberty Park, south of Bronson Way North and west of Houser Way North. 4. Legal Description: A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Building d Zoning Department. 5. Size of Property: :200 square feet 6. Access: Bronson Way North 7. Existing Zoning: P-1,Public Use U. Existing Zoning in the Area: B-1, Business Use; P-1, Public Use; and L-1,Light Industrial 9. Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Recreational 10. Notification: The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date. Notice was properly published in the Daily Record Chronicle on February 17. 1984, and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City Ordinance no.lebruary 17, 1984. C. HISTORY/BACKGROUND: The subject site is part of the original city site and has been zoned P-1, Public Use, since 1953,with the adoption of the first zoning code. D. PHYSICAL BACKGROUND: 1. Topography: The subject site is level. 2. Soils: Urban Land (Ur). This soil has been modified by disturbance of the natural layers with additions of fill material several feet thick to accommodate large industrial and housing installations. The erosion hazard is slight to moderate. No capability or woodland classification. PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS SA-013-84 FEBRUARY 28. 1904 PAGE 2 3. Vegetation: The subject site is covered by grass and a small stand of cedar trees. 4. Wildlife: The existing vagetatior�provides some habitat for birds. 5. Water: No water was observed on the site. 6. Land Use: The subject site is currently used as a well. E. NE:GHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS: The subject property is surrounded by the Liberty Park grounds and commercial uses to the north; 1-405 and the Cedar River Park to the east; Liberty Park grounds and the Cedar River to the south; and Liberty Park grounds and commercial uses to the west. F. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1. Utilities: a. Water - A twelve inch water line extends along Houser Way North near the subject site. In addition, a water supply well Is located on the site. b. Sewer-Not,applicable. C. Storm Water Drainage-Will not change existing pattern. 2. Fire Protection: Provided by the City of Renton as per ordinance requirements. 3. Transit: Not applicable. 4. Schools: Not applicable. 5. Recreation: Not applicable. G. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1. Section 4-718. Public District. H. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT: I. Northeast Renton Comprehensive Plan, City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium, pg. 40-45. 2. Utilities Goal and Objectives, Policies Element, City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium, pg. 22-24. 3. Utilities Plan, City of Renton, Department of Public Works. 1. IMPACT ON THE NATURAL OR HUMAN ENVIRONMENT: 1. Natural Systems: Minor. 2. Population/Employment: Not applicable. 3. Schools: Not applicable. 4. Social: Not applicable. 5. Traffic: Minor. J. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION: Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971. as amended,RCW 43-21C,a final declaration of non-significance was issued or, February 8, 1984, by the Environmental Review Committee. PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON,DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS SA-013-84 FEBRUARY 28. 19B4 PACE 3 K. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED: 1. City of Renton Building d Zoning Department. 2. City of Renton Design Engineering Division. 3. City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division. A. City of Renton Utilities Engineering Division. 5. City of Renton Fire Prevention Bureau. 6. City of Renton Policy Development Department. 7. City of Renton Parks 6 Recreation Department. L. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1. The applicant, the City of Renton Public Works Department, is requesting site plan approval to allow the reconstruction of municipal Well a3 located in the northeast corner of Liberty Park. 2. The proposal generally complies with the Recreational designation for Liberty Park on the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The proposal is to replace the existing underground well house with an above-the-ground structure. In the 1960's, when the existing structure was constructed, it was considered a very advanced design. It has now been determined that there exists both a safety hazard for general operation and a potential public health problem. The existing facility has only one access which could be blocked if a water pipe broke, thus trapping an individual wlt'iin the plant. In addition, the water supply could be more easily contaminated by a backflow because the facility is at a grade with the existing watermains. 4. The above ground structure will be built on the existing foundations of the present well vault. The service drive may have to be constructed from Bronson Way North located to the northwest of the subject building for access. S. The building will be tucked in behind the existing park vegetation. Only a minor amount of trimming of trees is anticipated during construction. This vegetation provides a very effective screen of the building. The Parks Department advises that, because property is still under the control of the Parks Board, final approval of the design must also he approved by the Parks and Recreation Department, specifically In relationship to landscaping and access. 6. The proposed building will not interfere with any of the existing recreational activities conducted in Liberty Park. The northeast corner is actually a surplus area that is beyond the limits of the existing baseball fields and recreational facilities to the south of the proposed building. 7. The Police Department advises that an intrusion alarm should be Included in the building. The new telematering system, which will be installed with well construction, includes an intrusion alarm and an emergency cutoff in case of contamination. 8. The Land Use Hearing Examiner has recently denied an adjacent land use application by Texaco because of the potential hazards upon the water obtained by the City from this specific Wall No. 3. The well, as showned In the well log, obtains water from elevations approximately 35 to 70 feet underground. M. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION: Based upon the above analysis, it is recommended that the site plan approval request, SA-015-84, be approved. >e .. — _ ��• , � .him � . 6 i' Itt PACk ''• Ti K a ir4 , l '.- z+'�'}. 231.:Y �•J i r°r�'S i i r. �l H-1 , •t t fee,I,, �.p . I I. ,, o ,: RECONSTRUCTION OF WELL 43 SA-013-84 APPLICANT CITY OF RENTON/PUBLIC WORKS DEPT_TOTAL AREA 200 PRINCIPAL ACCESS BRONSON WAY NORTH AND HOUSER WAY NORTH EXISTING ZONING P-1, PUBLIC USE EXISTING USE WELL 03 SITE _ PROPOSED USE RECNSTRUCTION OF WELL 03 ^_ COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN PUBLIC/QUASI-PUBLIC COMMENTS __ .nrr M� A u.. .. � =.tC��( •ti' .CC s w Wti7 °._ � • •r•� �mf*tea .. . y I .r �' • • pit i "{ Zg YcirS. t L.a� `q!. r- � r N.!1.,,���• � t�.eu�.t/e�a nw�ion s sre • I rqr OYOIII QY6'A rC t• ". - •n-W' G�.� .�.�... WELL ND 3 RF111ANUTATIah REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: _ ® APPROVED AOSOVED WITH CONDITIONS VI NOT APPROVED /r . it,a i 0404. 86 DATE: ;RZ Py IGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION r/lrrx Form 187 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: &APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED SIGNS IRE OP DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVEATE: 3 o-� REvisIoR snre: Form 19. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: ©APPROVED DAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 0NOT APPROVED DATE: /- a7 - k$f S GNATU IREC R OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE mnaioM siuu ® 0 APPROVED DROVED WITH CONDITIONS • FlNOT APPROVED /J/4-7e �/✓�l�(H,59>g r DATE; SIGNATURE OF DPRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1946 Tom 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION; //:/7FF/C Eirr/n/EEA? /IVC, APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED 44vlond A,„ 7a, k l•.1<� >~� e11 /j.r 4,.-.L� /�Nr�v lSyLry S//'^n...Y S�/� / J ✓' + V r2 li'H / ��i/�'c�7"Y.-0� ��n �'._ DATE: z SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 6/1982 Form 18' REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: 11r,417711 .EAILZn/6E.Pin/Cc APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED OT111T1 APPAIIA SINECI 10 _ UI[ t/YEAS A9IEEYfA1 tA1tA IAIE COYfiS ACIfEYLAT 00 SISIEN DEIfIIPY[IT tAWCE til[I SiSIEN DEVILIPPEEA1 CU1AE HYfI It-7 ATRIA ASSEAANEIT AILS C%AADf EATER SPECIAE nsfSAl1EAf A1fA tl7lif - 51/11 APP1001 6AIEt PEW ND APPAOf1D 'IA PES6 APPAICI nil IfOtAll WERE AS IT tiff n";l. No TIRE PEON U1031; DATE: — 26 IGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 6n 0 COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIIKOMMENTS TO THE BUILDING isONIN6 DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON FSSRu{RY 1984 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION; APPROVED El APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED /34<OIPL f TI-1 1-3 io .S/''c f 4g ' 6A 4r yre r�s 09 oc An✓ Sf+dw!N4 (3�oc r/aP ?/v LWq,✓ < UCd+7/UN� AAJ.O cL�ivOSf�1/�!.VG. �A/.'Y. /.�trf'> A�P�'u✓.!� o% ,oiPiliE'tvly f rv.9� S R unt 58 I , LY DATE:' SIGNATURE OF DIRECTORYOR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE Form 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: _ APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED ir- DATE: SIGNATUR E DIR OR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE / {EV1310N{/1{{= Form 182 j.. • CITY OF RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING FEBRUARY 28, t984 AGENDA COMMENCING AT 9:00 A.M.: COUNCIL CHAMBERS,SECOND FLOOR,RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING The applications listed are in order of application number only and not necessarily the order in which they will be heard. Items will be called for hearing at the discretion of the Hearing Examiner. PUGET SOUND POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY Application to rezone aproximately 0.84 acre of property from H-1 'o B-1, file R-010-84, and application for conditional use permit to construct an electrical distribution substation on said rezoned property (B-1), file CU-011-84. and application for special permit to allow 12.010 cubic yards of preload material and structural fill on said site, file SP-012-84; located on the west side of Talbot Road South approximately 500 feet south of South Grady Way. FREDERICK J. STIENER Application to rezone 0.8 acre of property from R-1 to B-1 to allow the construction of a two story office building having 17,500 square feet, file R-008-84: located on the south side of S.W. Grady Way between, Seneca Avenue S.W. and Raymond Avenue°.W.at approximately the 700 block. CITY OF RENTON PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Application for site plan approval to allow the reconstruction of a municipal water supply well in a P-1 zoned district, file SA-013-84; located in the extreme north corner of Liberty Park, Routh of Bronson Way North and west of Houser Way North. • �i.�.SZE'.J March 8, 1964 OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION. APPLICANT: CITY OF RENTJN DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS FILE NO.SA-013-84 LOCATION:_ Located in the extreme north corner of Liberty Park, south of Bronson Way North, and west of Houser Way North. SUMMARY OF REOULST: Applicant seeks site plan approval to allow the reconstruction of a municipal water supply well in a P-1 zoned district. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Building and Zoning Department Recommendation: Approval. Hearing Examiner Decision: Approval, subject to approval by the Park Board. BUILDING 6 ZONING The Building d Zoning Department Report was DEPARTMENT REPORT: received by the Examiner on February 21, 1984. PUBLIC HEARING: After reAewing the Building and Zoning Department Report. txamining available information on file with the application, and ield checking the Property and surrounding area. tha Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on February 28, 1984, at 11:05 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit .1 Yellow file containing the application, staff report, and other documents pertaining to posting and publication. Exhibit 02: Site plan for the proposed site. Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator, presented the staff report. He noted the applicant is seeking site plan approval to allow .he reconstruction of a municipal water supply well in a P-1 zoned district in Liberty Park. Further, the site plan does not Crow the access roadway from Bronson Way which will have to be constructed for servicing the well. Mr. Blaylock Cher drew said roadway on the site plan map. Mr. Blaylock indicated this proposal was to update the existing city services; the exisiing well has been in use for many years, but there now exists a problem with the well vault. It is creating unsafe working ror Jitions for the city employees anal there is a potential for some contamination in the backflow. He noted further that the structure would be tucked in on the existing foundation and basically will not disturb the natural vegetation on site except for some of the lawn area to allow construction o� the new access driveway to supply chemicals and for maintenance of the facility. Mr. Blaylock noted staff recommends approval of the request. The Examiner noted there was no one in attendance at the hearing other than city staff. Bob Bergstrom, Engineering Supervisor, commented that Well a3 was the original replacement for the well in Jones Park; that it w:.s built underground and there has been a problem with it filling up with water seepage; and that permission has been received from the Park Board to build the new above-ground f nlity. The Examiner called for further testimony. There bei,ig none. the hearing was closed at 11:15 a.m. The Examiner noted his decision would be issued within 14 days. CITY OF RENTON. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS SA-013-84 March S. 1984 Page 2 FINDINGS. CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: I. The applicant, City of Renton. Department of Public Works, filed a request for approval of a site plan to reconstruct a municipal water well. 2. The application file containing the application, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation, the Building d Zoning Department Report, and other pertinent documents.was entered into the record as Exhibit al. 3. Pursuant to t�, City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA, a Declaration of Non-Significance has been issued for the subject proposal by the Environmental Review Committee(ERC), responsible official. 4. Plans for the proposal have heen reviewed by all city departments affected by the impact of this development. 5. The subject proposal met with no opposition from the public. b. The subject site is located in the northeast corner of Liberty Park near the intersection or Bronson Way N. and Houser Way N. 7. The site is part of the original City of Renton and has been classified P-1 (Public) since 1953 when the zoning code was originally adopted. 8. The Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for recreational uses. 9. The development of any facilities in the P-1 zone, including municipally sponsored facilities.requires site plan review. 10. The plan for the well was approved by the Park Board, but the road, which will be paved with asphalt, was not part of the plan which that Board reviewed. Therefore, Park Board review will be required for the road. IL The original well is located underground as a result of earlier Park Board conditions, but such undergrounding has led to flooding and safety problems, necessitating redesign and reconstruction of the facility. 12. 1 he property involved will be approximately 200 square feet without the roadway access. 13. Existing park vegetation will screen the facility from view and the facility will be located away from recreational sports fields. CONCLUSIONS: 1. The subject proposal appears to serve the public use and interest. The current facility is unsafe from both a maintenance and water supply aspect. Not only does periodic flooding hamper repair activities, but drowning and electrocution are potential hazards of maintenance. 2. Backflow during flooding could also introduce contaminants into the water supply. endangering the public health. The new facility would be above ground level and flooding problems wouid be eliminated. 3. The landscaping of the building and its location would permit the structure to unobtrusively blend in with the existing park. The location also prevents the structure from interfering with recreational opportunities in the park. A. The Park Board apparently has not had an opportunity to review •ne entire plan, including the road, and this office does not have overriding authority in matters relating to parks. T he approval of the Park Board will be required as a condition of approval. CITY OF RENTON, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WOR!,S SA-013-04 March 8. 1984 Page 3 DECISION: The site plan is approved subject to approval of the Park Board- ORDERED THIS 8th day of March, 1984. Fred J. Kaufman Land Use Hearing ExamAr TRANSMITTED THIS Sth day of March, 1984 to the parties of record: Members of City Staff Chairman,Renton Park Board Director,Parks 6 Recreation Department TRANSMIT TED THIS 8th day of March, 1984 to the following: Mayor Barbara Y.Shinpoch Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Richard Houghton,Public Works Director David Clemens,Policy Development Director Members, Renton Planning Commission Ronald Nelson, Building 3 Zoning Director Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator Lawrence J.Warren,City Attorney Renton Record-Chronicle Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request fur reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before March 22. 1984. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or ',ct, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of ti,e record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016. which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk. accompanying a filing fee of $75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. The Appearance of Fairness Coctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may nut communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the the proposal must be made in public. This permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. � �'� 'VT��� �C V � • NUM1C tY r• L�,I • H-1 P-1 - R-i i ti- r I .%. PACK �• •wt� � N 14-1 'r ! - i H-1 s�. a L{ I• . i ,• � t� RECONSTRUCTION OF WELL #3 SA-013-84 APPLICANT CITY OF RENTON/PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. TOTAL AREA ± 200 SO. FT._ PRINCIPAL ACCESS BRONSON WAY NORTH AND HOUSER WAY NORTH EXISTING ZONING_ P-1, PUBLIC USE _ EXISSING USE WELL #3 SITE PROPOSED USE RECNSTRUCTION OF WELL 03 COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN-PUBLIC/QUASI-PUBLIC COMMENTS GARDNER ENGINEERS. INC. • ..swo•x x rxex.•..f lenuN I lo[•e,I f. CONSULTING ENGINEERS/SURVEYORS•SINCE 1881 rxx.a.r nmwrn..v f 8 MARCH 1984 FILE: 514n NAR 8 19gq CITY OF RENTON DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS 200 MILL AVENUE SOUTH RENTON WASHINGTON 98055 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES i FEBRUARY TIRU 29 FEBRUARY 1584 WELL NO. 3 REHABILITATION TASK 111- 1. MODIFIED BUILDING CONFIGURATION - OUT OF SCOPE WORK STRUCTURAL SUB-CONSULTANT $242.00 DRAFTER 5.75 FRS @ 31.00 131.25 $373.25 TASK IV. 2. CONSTRUCTION SERVICES PROJECT ENGINEER 4.5 HRS I@ 60.00 270.00 SENIOR ENGINEER 2 FRS @ 45.00 90.00 EXPEMES: TRANSPORTATION 9.00 369.00 TOTAL ... ... ... ... ... ... .$742.25 t �'^ CHARiiR 116, LAWS OF I, OF RENTON CERTIFICATION L ixa 011is 0o xuur cranry ex�[x n aauar ar c.[ [ur,` x.v[ aaaarax[a.Txu 5ixvm.5 a[hall, aM O IYu ,a:tioOsa I/ ou[ av i rNloa1a}Amv Me aLall, rICAii'-.a 0ODOIIS. [ Sol. 37. 41 COD) 4742.2C- SUITE 241 • MARKET PLACE ONE l• 2W1 Wattern Avenue • Seattle, Washmston 98121 (An)624-5265 BUILDIN: DEPARTMENT CITE OF RENTON, WASHING tAPPLICATION FOR BUILDIHG PPF� TO BE FILLED Q)T IN DETAIL BY APPLICANT OR PERMIT CANNOT BE ISSM Omer: CIT-f of (ce/ut(Y.1 Job Address 13w F1 t4&L Lt.IP/ S Address+ - �fl�T�L`/ Lot Block —' SUCdielsion ^ Telephone: �7j5�a�31 I..1C3 '%Y PVt1, -.. Est. value of Co mpleted Works }} rvS // al).Lib Description of Work: f tccv ciroxi OF !,/✓QEdiL✓SO_~j I.Je _ FAE1 LIiY TO BJi�: nco PN.-tP kfO:+YG Contract_. . _ State License No. Address: _._ Bus. Si:. :lo. Telephcca City: _ "ales Tax No. Fire Pesistive Iicu•ri -.c.. ._Ronf -overing Ord_nary Masonry tloc-! F. _r, _No. o: Stories xt. c. , .:ts Cnprntec'erl M-til How Heated -- Pla s Sutrit'c•d: _._ ::o __ :ILTEACM: Front Yard Pear Yard Line Yard 51& Yard (1) This ap;a:cat an does ne,. constitute n Permit to work. Work is nc 'o ccrnenee until bu11:1in^ pcmit is posted on premises where work is to be performed. (2) Certification Is hereby rendered that no work is to be done exeest as descrihsd anc that all work shall conlorn to the applicable codes. (I) Work in public right-of-way and/or utility easements is not authorized under this application. (e) ENCLOSE A SELP-ADDRESSED, STA:tPED ENVELOPE if uesting pemit be returned by mail Total Fee Enclo-.ed $ Signature Date �¢- NOTE: Make check payable to City of Penton ART CROW5ER & associates inc. GEOTECHNICAL A HYDROGEOLOGIC CONSULTANTS J-1380 April 18, 1984 Gardner Engineers 2001 Western Avenue Suite 241, Market Place Seattle, WA 98121 Attn: Mortimer If. Thomas, P.E. Re: Condition of Existing City of Renton Well No. 3 and Recommendations Dear Mr. Thomas: This letter presents a summary of our observations made during a video scan Of the City of Renton Well No. 3 and recommendations on water system improvements ar the well site. The work was performed In response to your request relayed during our telephone conversation of A�rfl 12, 1984. A proposal covering the work performed and planned at Well No. 3 is being sent to you under separate cover. A separate proposa) is also being sent to you covering installation of a monitoring well ar•oss Bronson Way North at a service station. This letter, and both of the proposals are written In response to our discussions with you and Run Olsen of the City of Renton following the site visit on April 12. On April 12 and the preceeding few days, work cn well No. 3 was performed that prompted the present work and proposals. preceeding work consisted of pulling the existing pump, Injecting clear water into the well over night, and running a video scan of the well - water was -ontlnually injected Into the well. Our involvement on the job Leman with a call from Mort Thomas requesting our services as a result of the casing conditions revealed during the well scan. Summary of Observations and Conclusion, Resulting From the Video Scan of Existing Well No. 3 -- o The well is perforated starting at 32 feet below the top of the 12 inch steel casing (this datum will he used throughout this letter). The well screen reported In the well construction data was not observed. o The well likely produces water mostly from the top of the perforations, at a depth of approximately 32 feet, down to a depth of 20 feet based on clearing of turbidity within this zone as water was injected into 1910 Ff M1 e*Avenue ESit•San ne wA 931023699•I206032,9530 Gardner Engineers J-1380 April 18, 1984 Page 2 the well. The zone from 70 feet downward to the reported bottom at 106 feet depth (datum unknown) may be perforated but is likely not producing a substantial amount of water during well pucpage. o Well casing and perforations In the productive zone (32 to 70 feet depth) appear very encrusted with what is probably a combination of scale and rust flakes. o The actual condition of the steel beneath the crust was not observable, but, based on the present rounded condition of the mills-knife Perforations (original shape elongate and approximately . by 1/4 inches) , the condition of the steel Is likely poor. o The casing is perforated to a higher degree than is presently recommended. This has likely reduced the strength of the casing further. o Logging of the well, and the presence of turbid water below a depth of Ill feet may also indicate that a substantial amount of settled solids have entered the well. o based on the observations above, it may be desirable for the City to drill a new well at the Well No. 3 site Instead of rehabilitating (redevelnping) the existing well. o We understand that water from the site will be required during the peak ester use months this summer. Considering the condition of the existing well casing, we recommended that redevelopment not be performed at the present time because of the unpredictable results (possible casing breakage, sand production, etc.). We recommend reinstalling the existing pump in the well in its undisturbed condition and proceed with drilling a new well nearby that could be brought online after sumxr. o The new well should be drilled nearby to the existing well to make use of the existing utilities. We recommend that the new well he drilled while the existing well rs not being pumped because of the possibility of fine soil particles (disturbed at the new well location) being transported to the existing well and being introduced Into the water system. Gardner Engineers J-1380 April 18, 1984 Page 3 We look forward to working with you further on this project. If you have any questions regarding this work or the forth coming pro,+orals, please call at your convenience. Sincerely, HART-CROYSER 8 ASSOCIATES, INC. CHARLES T. ELLINGSON Project Hydrogeologi{t .TERRYOW /O�MTE / Vice President CTE/TLO:jw OF RFC J �41 z PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT DESIGN/UTILITY ENGINEERING 235-2631 n MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200MILLAVE.50. RENTON,WASH.9B056 e EP r�D SEvtEW'0 BARBARA Y. SHINPCCH MAYOR April 20, 1984 Texaco 10602 N.E. 38th Place K� kland, WA 98033 Attention: Mr. J. K. Worsham, Area Manager Dear Mr. Worsham: The City of Renton requests written permission to enter upon your gas W station located at Meadow Ave. N. and Bronson Way for the purpose of P), drilling a 24" exploratory observation well approximately 30 feet deep. The location would be as discussed with Mr. Gerl and Mr. Salmon last week. The location was in the southwest corner of your site. The hole would not affect traffic in or out of your station. The purpose of this well would be to check on whether there is any petroleum product leakage into the Well No. 3 water aquifer. This observation well has been requested by the Department of Social and Health Services, District Engineer, Mr. Moe Batra. If you have any questions on the above, please contact me at 235-2631. Sincerely yours, Ronald L. Olsen Utility Engineer :jft i Hokkaido Drilling& Deuelopira Cap. P.O.Boa 100 G•aham.Washington 98338 1`117-3579 April brU., 194:r City of Renton 200 Mill St. Renton. Washington 98005 Attentions Ron Olsen Quote for Emergency Replacement Well #3 1. Mob 6 de-moi. $ 160.00 2. Install 24" surface seal L.S. .00 3. Complete surface seal L.S. .00 4. One 2L" drive shoe L.S. 500.00 5. Drill 20" hole - 80' Ld $45.00 per ft. 3,600.00 6. Furnish 20" casing - 80' @ $22.00 oer ft. 1,760.00 7. Furnish 16" Telescopic Screen 20' @ $195.00 per ft. 3,900.00 a) 8-16" Welding rings @ $100.00 ea. 800.00 b) 1-16" screen bottom plate 130.00 c) 16" riser pipe - 20' @ $15.00 per ft. 300.00 8. Authorized hourly Work. F.stimtate 24 hrs. @ $80.00 per hr. 1,920.00 (Screen Betting - surge 6 develope) 9. Ex.ra materials (filter pack - air freight) 500.00 10. Furnish 6 install test pump I-S. 800.00 11. Operate teat pump 10 lira. @ $60.00 per hr. 600.00 $14,970.00 Ai'R 2 5 ]q84 'GARDNER ENGINEERS. INC. s.wa i YmYr r t CONSULTING ENCiINFFRS/SURVEYORS• SINCF VN11 r '.1 ,.,...r[ 25 APRIL 1984,n FILE: 5140-1't" III'JJInUUU( �(�,� CITY OF RENTON DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS 200 MILL AVENUE SOUTH RENTON WASHINGTON 98055 APR p 6 ]°84 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1 MARCH THRU 31 MARCH 1984 PLANS AND SPECS - REVISION TO BUILDING WELL NO. 3 OUT OF SCOPE WORK NOT COVERED BY CONTRACT OF 10 AUGUST 1983 PRINCIPAL ENGINEER 1.5 MRS @1 68.00 S102.00 SENIOR ENGINEER 5.5 MRS 0 45.00 247.50 EXPENSES: TRANSPORTATION 5.40 CHAF'ih ilc.LAVYS OF 10-3 TOTAL ... ... ... ... ...S354.9, CITY OE RE';TON CCRTIFICATION � (TU 4+^I/ca/,S. iaE ;' tI Cuo) 3i.� (.K/'+/aa ITE 241 • MARKET PLACE ONE '011 Western Avenue • Seattle, Washington 9M121 (206)62e-5265 $ GARDNER ENGINEERS, INC- •"°"'^"" ^'°'"" rE ` tww I tm.,r t CUNWITING ENGINEERS/SURVEYORS•SINCE 1883 25 APRIL 1984 FILE:CITY OF RENTON 40 Irmi DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS 200 MILL AVENUE SOUTH RENTON WASHINGTON 98055 APR 2 6 1984 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES I MARCH THRV 31 MARCH 1984 WELL NO. 3 - WORK ACCOMPLISHED: PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION 100% $1,500.00 DESIGN REPORT 100% 2,500.00 P.S. L E. - 96a 9,257.50 $13,257.50 LESS PREVIOUSLY PAID 12,969.50 C� AMOLNT DUE ON THIS INVOICE S 288.00 ....�C_al g01/00.'/iS iui -t7 all Coo) ZOO �2s/f/40� 'I ITT 241 • MARKET PEACE ONE Apl Western A.e«ue • Seattle,WashmRton 98121 (2%)624h265 GAFLDNER EN 'HERB. INC. • ""', " r"°7 °[ \Aorwa 1 CONSULTING ENGINEERS/SURVEYORS•SINCE INUI T' —,A r•l*••• 4 MAY 1984 FILE: 5140 CITY OF RENTON DEPT. OF PUBLIC PARKS 200 MILL AVENUE SOUTH RENTON WASHINGTON 98055 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES I APRIL THRU 30 AoRIL 1984 WELL NO. 3 — WORK ACCOMPLISHED: TASK 1 PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION 100% $1,500.00 TASK 2 DESIGN REPORT 100% 2,500.00 TASK 3 P.S.6E. 9,224.35 $13,224.35 LESS PREVIOUSLY PAID 13,104.35 AMOUNT DUE ON THIS INVOICE S 120.00 TASK 4 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES MODIFY BUILDING FOR WELL RIG $1,674.35 PUMP REHAB., NEW PUP 999.00 TEXACO PROBLETI 374.70 3,048.05 LESS PREVIOUSLY PAID 2,043.35 �,WDUINT DUE ON THIS INVOICE 1.004.70 TOTAL AMOUNT DUE THIS INVOICE $1,124.70 CMas,tt6it 11G, LA,io Ur l.a� ciTY OF RENTON CERTIFICATION el Nal.l m�(�Jull�xif rf(f ti�il M'�[fUwuE \UN NN:nfNl P.4[ furiC�9 nNnr A[u na .A �uof AMA .1^lU ,.o[,..0AwU rwar MI C\MY If ," DU6 "l UNel4 1.11 11 AM Y41N\t lxa C 11 OI •l Nifty. M. iwlr AM AYrxplll� t0 I.f1N[N1M11t Mlq ClNlnJ- l� .faly � }Ot/opol15. Sel 31. SURE 241 A MARKET PLACE ONE 2WI Wbtern Asenue A Seattle. Washington 98121 (1Cb:b24-526S TRAVIS, FITZMAURICE & A3SOCIATES, INC. ELECTRICAL ENGINEERS 222 ETRU 4IA. SUITF 200 (FORMERLY BEVERLY A.TRAVIS A ASSOCIATES. INC.I SEATTLE.WAStJNGTON 98109 G F.FITZMAURICE JAMES O TRAVIS PHONE 0081 285 i228 CRAIG T MARTIN,ASSOCIATE 6-6-84 _ Gardner Engineers, Inc- Market 20 lestern, Suite 41 JUN 11 .1V LJ Seattle, W1. 98121 GARDNER ENGINEERS, INC. Pwfesswnal Sanrica.EIKtncal Engmeenng Penton REP Station Time for March, 1984 Drafter IS hrs. @ $25.00 $]7.50 y� Il�y 1 oil 7 Al Job No. 83-68 i JOB N0. J-1380 • *C H �.KVWSER & DATE Jane 30, 1984 associates inc. GEOTECHNICAL a HYDROGEOLOGIC CONSULTANTS INVOICE NO. 39-06-84 P. O. 40. GARDNER ENGINEERS RE Hydrogeological Engineering Services Suite 241 Market Place Une Renton Well 03 Services 2001 Western Avenue Renton, Washington Seattle, WA 98121 ATTN: Mr. Mortimer H. Thomas PLEASE PAY FROM THIS INVOICE (R.Wm ale. Copy wHn P.ymenl) Balance Forward Interest at 1.5% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (through 4/28/84) Principal Geologist (1.0 hrs @ $80/hr) $ 80 Associate Hydrogeologist (2.0 hrs @ $65/hr) 13C Project Hydrogeologist (19.25 hre @ $50/hr) 903 Clerical (4.75 hrs @ $30/hr) 1.3 Travel (30 al @ $.30/mi) 9 In-House Reproduction 7 Miscellaneous 5 CURRENT SERVICES $1,337 TOTAL NOW DUE $1,337 Invoiced to Date $1,337 G� ~ L JUL GARDNER EN NEERS. INC. 1910 rau.nw Ar nw Eul•S..u4wA 9e102360-(2061324-9500 GARDNER ENGINEERS. INC. • tan,,,»,x itoeu,.r t CONSULTING ENGINEERS/SURVEYORS•SINCE 7883 ilwxr/ 7 AUGUST 1984 FILE: 5140 CITY OF RENTON DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS 300 MILL AVID&C SOUTH RENTON WA 98055 INVOICES REFERRING TO WELL NO, 3: MART CROWSER 6 ASSOCIATES, INC. $1,337.00 TRAVIS, FITZMAURICE G ASSOCIATES, INC. 37.50 TOTAL ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...$1,374.50 CHARTCR 116, LAWS OF CITY OF RENTON CERTIF: r. i0lV LABOP HujU.]elscni[0 eCI1UM.An0 inl,r T.L xL 0u iY t A mu. uuc txo uxram c{ ♦4N{i t t {ITT {r UMM. MO I..,TNa 1 aelNe{IT{11 N aY/Illlllllai( NI{ 650TI/1 TO 4ol/ow/IS Sol. 31. 41 �OO) �,3�4aJ CkSlfu , SUITE 141• MARKET PLACE ONE 1W1 Westem Avenue • Seattle. Washington 9bul (Ak)614-510 • • -1 �GARDNER ENGINEERS. INC. ,^»• IN—d Ip{11r,r 1. CONSULTING ENGINEERS/SURVEYORS•SINCE 1803 9 December 1984 FILE: 5140 CITY OF RENTON DEFT. OF PUBLIC WORKS 200 MILL AVENUE SOUTH RENTON WASHINGTON 98055 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1 JAUARY THRU 31 JANUARY 1984 WELL ND. 3 - WORK ACCOMPLISHED: PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION LOOT $1,500.00 DESIGN REPORT 100% 2,500.00 P.S.&E. 58� 5,928.00 S9,928.0C r .....I'm L1fSG,►NEHIOUSWer PAID 9.3,62.50 CITY Of RENTON CERi, —' , Yi •„ S 585.50 AUM DUE THIS ,INVOICE ... ... ... ... ... r TXL ..0'RRIpNf11 nn ,111r 11Y f.�l Y •�XXLIY Or iR111XY, i,.nt l.' M.r . IM i11XNrLMi p. THI \I XrI ' LXROX ILXIOXA LO JUST.OW ANO UNFAI 1N 61ry •1 TX[ CIIT IS 111T.f R Me UNv\iL O\L,'.M1li`M X111M1{T 1NL CITY .f X[NI1Nr RNp IMXI To XYTNOIIIILO TO XGI.jI I/Np fI P_T,LY TO MI. WNIM I .,pYe Ol 401 44 toR SUM W 1 MARKET RACE ONE XM VV"Wm Avenue 1 SeanW, wafhmpon 9M2T (Il16)626-SM • 1.4 ,2s �GARDNER ENGINEERS, INC. IP,MA 1 IMP P 1 CCR15EJlTING ENGINEERS/SURVEYOR$•SINCE 1l8.1 TMrv•rA.r m1...P..q i t 9 FE/IWRY 196� FILE: SIWI CITY OF PENTON DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS 200 MILL AVENUE SOUTH RENTON WASHINGTON 99055 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1 JANUARY THdU 31 JAN.ARY 1984 PLANS AND SPECS - REV13ION TO BUILDING WELL ND. 3 PROJECT MANAGER 5 MRS la 61.00 S305.00 SENIOR EN INEER 4 HRS 'd 57.00 188.00 CAMPANELU GROUP 453.20 TOTAL ... .. . ... ... .. . ... ... 5946."<0 CHARTGR E� "'°T 1983. BY CITY OF RENTON CERTMCAN 1. TM( o awxla ea Mellin •..Pun Pl M1111, PV r. . T4lI '% \IS r•P Ma SI v( e(IM .r P' \ rxr i4l I•-PVICT[S x.4l.li P� n- •! IPYOP f" .4M.p PS Or:!':MrwCO wlllcr V.P',l tMPT THE \ Cui4 is Ion.ouC AMP UN PUO 1PunS1i0M I.OMI M,1 a-E CIIV Of PE MT MI. PMJ T4PT I AM ALT MOP IttO 10 AIJIIIWIC.\T[ PMa CIPT", Te SAIG CLAIM QOI/omhc Sol 37 QI '(,)L)J t946 SMITE 241 .MARKET PEACE ONE 2001 Western AIm,,w P SNllle. WMh.nRWn 9e121 (206)62Mw OF R c BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 1 RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR M\INICIV4L BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.50 RENTON WASH 9111055 111, 235-I540 E P rFDpTE r ebruary, 15, 1984 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR Ron Olsen Department of Public Works 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Re: Application for site approval for reconstruction of Well N 3. Dear Mr. Olsen: The City of Renton Building aril Zoning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on January 26, 1984. A public hearing before the City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner has been scheduled fur f ebruary 28, 1984. The public hearing commencm at 9:00 in the Council Chambers w the second fluor of City Hall. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is rwTuirod to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you before the hearing. If you have any gestiuns,please call the Building and lunirg Department at 235-2550. Sincerely. r UlaylM Zoning Administrator RJU:cl 0699Z ' ' n s we � sw nJ e�-� DRAFT Mr. Moe R. Batra, P.E. Regional Engineer r Water Supply 8 Waste Section Dept. of Social and Health Services 1409 Smith Tower, 817-9 Seattle Washington 98104 Re: Well No. 3 Rehabilitation Dear Mr. Batra: The City has budgeted for the rehabilitation of our existing Well 63 this year. The present facility is a line shaft vertical turbine in an underground concrete building. The facility is vulnerable to flooding with potential for both equip- ment damagf and well contamination. We had originally planned to build a new above ground building directly over the existing facility, raising tre motor and electrical equipment above grade. We retained a consultant, Gardner Engineers, for the project. During their investigation the existing well was T.V.ld and the casing was found to be baeHy-deteriorated. The Consultant strongly recommended that no further investment be made in the existing well facility and that instead a new well be drilled immediately adjacent to the existing. Subsequently the Well Field Protection Study ;raised the question of the prox- imity of the Texaco Station to Well No. 3 and the ootention for acquifer con- tamination from it. Your letter of 12 June 1984 addresses your concerns at some length. At this time we are seeking some guidance as to the best course of action. We see three options: 1. Do nothing. The well pump was rebuilt this Spring and is probably good for 12 to 15 years. This option leaves exposure to both the Texaco problem and the flooding hazard from the underground installation. 2. The City could acquire the Texaco site and then redrill Well No. 3. As a practical matter this is a long lead time, if ever, solution. In the interim we face the same exposure as the do nothing option. 3. Proceed with the rehabilitation of Well No. 3. At the same time take all possible precautions with the Texaco Station as recommended on pages 4 • 11 to 4 - 13 of the Well Field Protection Study. This option has the advantage of eliminating the exposure to flooding while mitigating, through not solving, the Texaco hazard, The third option appears the best available solution for the City. It gives the most improvement of the well field protection in the shortest possible time but does not preclude the optimum solution of moving the Texaco station. We would lire to proceed with the Well 13 redrilling if you feel you can concur with our ti-nking on the benefits of project. Very truly your , etc. OF RC, .` tiT U z PUBLIC WORK.: DEPARTMENT Mll DESIGN/UTILITY ENGINEERING 0 235-2631 p MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON.PlASH.88055 9q b 0 9'TEO SEPItoee BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR April 15, 1985 Mr. Moe Batra, P.E. Regional Engineer water Supply L Waste Section Department of Social c Health Services 1409 Smith Tower Bldg. Seattle, WA 98104 Subject: Well No. 3, Protection Status, W-728 Dear Mr. Bdtra: The City is proceeding with a number of Solutions to the problems with Well No. 4 and the general well field protec- tion situation. Specifically, on Well No, 3, Texaco is proceeding with installation of double wall underground sstorage tank with provisions for observation at their ser- vice station near the well. For the overall well field protection, the City is taking the following steps: 1. Retained CH2M-Hill to do an analysis of the direction of ground water flows within the aquifer. 2. Purchased golf course property to the east along the river to provide a backup well field in case of major contamination. 3. We are now reviewing all development plans within the critical area to eliminate or ameliorate potential pollution sources. 4. We have prepared a brochure for general distribution so that all residents are aware of the problem. 5. Retained RH2 Engineering to prepare our emergency response plan, including well field contamination. 6. We are working on a City ordinance which will pull together all of the above elements of the protection scheme. To, Noe Satre -j- At this time, t.. --ty wishes to proceed with the drilling of the relocated Well No. 3 as indicated on the enclosed site plan. We request therefore that the Department approve the indicated `ocation for Well No. 3. we will also proceed with the now well house plans for submittal later this year. Very truly yours, Robert E. Bergstrom, P.E. Enginear;ng Supervisor ejft Enclosure Oak • KAM RAM Stomav STATE OF VVAkf4GTON DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL AND HEALTH SERVICES rant/sown 7,n,w 91--4 a kettle. 6Vagwglua vas'rr May 1,1985 City of Renton Public Works Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Attention: Mr. Robert E. Bergstraa,P,E, Subject: Relocation of Well Nr, 3 Dear Mr. Bergstrom: I have received the request by your department rega•dng the proposed drilling of the relocated Well No. 3. The follow4-,g items have been noted: 1. The City of Renton has retained CH,%-Htll Engineering to evaluate and analyze the directi•.a-of groundwater flow within the shallow aq.ifer who-h serves your principal well sources. 2. The City has acquired tt., golf course to the east of the wall field in order to prow de land for future source of supply in cane of major contamination to the groundwater aquifer. 3. A brochure showing .he critical areas in order to educate the the citizens of thf need to protect the quality of the ground- water source has b.en developed. 4. The retained engireer is to develop and prepare an emergency response plan in case of well field contamination. In addition to the above items, It is recommended that the city pursue aggressively, the eatablis ment of a City ordinance that will pull to- gether all the elements of potential contaminants and activities Mich could impact the groundwater ,;uality as identified in the approved "Groundwater Protection Study". Also, the City should monitor and critically review all development Flans within the identified critical area to eliminate or ameliorate Potential pollution sources. The double walled gasoline tanks within the sphere of influence of proposed Well No. 3 must be continually monitored for leaks,as well as all other service statlons,especially In the areas of concern should have monitoring capability. Based on the aforementioned observations and items of rrncern, the proposed relocation of Well No. 3 is satisfactory In .ctordance with WAC 248-54. �,,) Very my r Moe R. [ra'1,5�+/// MRB: Regional Engineer ,y,*at-r Supply 6 Waste Section EP=Y{',s T1w • a11M1\lelf I1 'R�omaa.P E CON" __'.NNd ENGINEERS-SINCE IM43 L<o� J I ke PE PE 6UITE 300.2124 F)MRTH AVENUE Seattle.Washingtcn 98121 (206)729-1883 December 11, 19e5 File: 5140 Mr. Ron Olsen Utility Engineer City of Rentcn Department of Public Works 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Re: Well 03 Rehabilitation W?28 Dear Ron, Per your request we enclose the seven plans and the draft technical specifications for the above project. Very truly yours, Mortimer H. Thomas, P.E. Enc. 1032N CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO.: ECF-004-86 APPLICATION NO(%).: SA-WS-86 SM-001-86 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application to replace/reconntruct existing well •1. 02. and 03 and to replace ex'sting structure and add pool chlorine equipment and storage. PROPONENT: City of Renton Public Works Department Engineering Division LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Property located in Liberty Park LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton. Building and Zoning Department. The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does rot have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2Xc). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. Thera is no comment period for this DN5. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South,Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 235-2550 APPEAL: You may appeal this determination in writing to Renton Hearing Examiner no later than February 24. 1986. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact City of Renton. Building and Zoning Department to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. DATE OF DECISION: Feuruary 5, 1986 PUBLICATION DALE: February 10, 1986 onatd G. Nelson ri r Building and Zoning Director Policy De men[ for st Rlchwd qq4buighion Public Wafts Director zzsoz CITY OF RENTON 6 Q HEARINf EXAMINER PUBLIC FEARING MARCH 4, 1986 AGENDA COMMENCING AT 9:00 A.M.: COUNCIL CHAMBERS. SECOND FLOOR, RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING The applicatiors listed are in order of app,lcation number only and not necessaril•• the order in which ;hey will be heard. Items will be called for hearing at the discretion of the Hearing Examiner. CITY OF RENTON Application for site plan approval to allow the replacement/reconstruction of existing Wells a I, e2, and a5 as well as replacement of existing building enclosing the well sites. Pool chlorine equipment and a storage area will also be included in the building, file 5A-005-86 and SM-001-86: property located in Liberty Park. 2238Z BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER 1 IC HEARING H 4. 1986 APPLICANT: CITY OF RENTON/DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS FILE NUMBER: SA-005-06 A. SUMMARY 6 PURPOSE OF REQUEST: The applicant seeks approval to allow the replacement/reconstruction of existing wells 01, 02 and a3 as well as replacement of the existing building enclosing the well sites. Chlorine equipment for the nearby pool and a storage area will also be included in the building. B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record: City of Renton 2. Applicant: City of Renton/Dept. of Public Works 3. Location: (Vicinity Map Atta,.hed) Liberty Park at 1OO Houser Way North 4. Existing Zoning: P-1, Public Use 5. Existing Zoning in the Area: P-1. Public Use: B-1. Business Use 6. Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Recreation 7. Size of Property: t 1584 square feet B. Access: Houser Way North 9. Land Use: Site currently consists of cl,y park and well field. 10. Neighborhood Characteristics: North: Liberty Park and Commercial Uses East: 1-405 and Cedar River Park South: Cedar River, Public Uses West: Library and Liberty Park Grounds C. HISTORY/BACKGROUND: The subject site is part of the original city site and has been zoned P-1, Public Use. since 1953 when the first zoning code was adopted. O. PUBLIC SERVICES: I. Utilities: a. Water: Site consists of existing wells. b. Sewer: N/A Fire Protection: Provided by the City of Renton as per ordinance requirements. 3. Transit: N/A 4. Schools: a. Elementary Schools: N/A In. Middle Schools: N/A C. High Schools: N/A PRELIMINARY REPORT *THE HEARING EXAMINER • CITY OF RENTON/DEPT. OF PUBLIC WPRKS. FILE NO. SA-005-86 MARCH 4. 1966 PAGE 2 5. Recreation: N/A E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE! I. Section 4-710. Public Use. F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT: 1. Facilities Objective, Community F acilities Goal. City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium, January 1985. p. 24. 2. Community Facilities Objective. Central Area Plan, City of Renton, Comprehensive Plan Compendium, January 1905, p. 65. G. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: I. The applicant, the City of Renton Public Works Department, is requesting site plan approval to construct a 1.584 square foot building to replace the well housing for City wells 01, 42. and 03. In addition, it will provide areas for chlorination of the municipal swimming pool and well chlorination and flouridation. The facility is a multi-purpose building that services both the Parks and Recreation Department's operation of the municipal swimming pool and the Public Works Department's operation of three City wells as a source of domestic water supply. 2. The site is located between the City's municipal swimming pool and the Cedar River. It is within the jurisdiction of the Shorelines Master Program and will require a substantial development permit. 5. The Environmental Revi,.w Committee has issued a declaration of non-significance. The areal period expired on Monday. February 24, 1986. at 5 P.M. 4. Various C`.ty departments have reviewed the proposed project and all have issued declarations of support and approval of the design. 5. In the review of the site plan, the staff and the Hearing Examiner should normally consider Cite following criteria: • Compatibility of Adjacent Structures • Compliance with Compre:,ensive Plan and Zoning Code • Access(both general and emergency) • F unctionality of Parking Lot • Traffic Circulation(both on-site and off-site) • Pedestrian Circulation • Usable Public Open Space • On-site Recreation The above review criteria applies when we are looking at the development of a new site. In this case, we are looking at revisions to existing functions. The proposal consolidates public services that are in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code. Access to the site. use of the adjacent parking areas. and general traffic circulation are not modified by the Droposal. Pedestrian circulation will be modified slightly while the usable public open space will be reduced by approximately 1,200 square feet. On-site recreation will not be affected and, in fact. will Improve the safety of the on-site recreation provided at the municipal swimming pool. The present chlorine facility does not meet today's standards, and the separation of the chlorine from the main building will improve the general public safety. The building is compatible with the octagonal design introduced into Liberty Park as part of the new picnic shelter. The building will be constructed of durable materials not only to last a longer period of time but for security with the functions of the facility. A preformed metal roof will be utilized except for where there will be skylights where pumps can be lowered In and out for maintenance if necessary. It is anticipated that the structure will not be noticed in the total scheme of tho activities of the site. PRELIMINARY REPORT TIPHE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON/DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS. FILE NO. SA-00 -86 MARCH a, 1986 PAGE S H. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION: Based upon the above analysis, it is recommended that the site approval, file number SA-005-86, by the :ity of Renton Public Works Department be approved as submitted. Ah P-1 s � e�i . RT4v L R-2 R-4 - e . " t B-1 � 1 `,: P-1� s B-1 9u11.{' C H-1 't! B-4 R- 1 H-1 M-P CITY OF RENTON DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS SA-005-86 CITY OF RENTON APPLICANT DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS TOTAL AREA ; 1584 SQ. FT. PRINCIPAL ACCESS HOUSER WAY NORTH EXISTING ZONING P-I, PUBLIC USE EXISTING USE CITY PARK AND WELL FIELD _.. PROPOSED USE REPLACEMENT/RECUNSIRUCTIUN Of EXISTING WELLS •1, -2, and • �. COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN RELREATION COMMENTS _ ILL LAND L79E ELEMENT Single Family Commercial ❑ Low Density ® Office % Office Park / Multl-Family - Medium DensityED Public;Quasi-Public Multi-Fancy - High Density Multi-Family U.J. Industrial 1 ' Heavy Industrial 1 Recreation •�•� i.. Greenbelt l 1 Manufacturing Park `\ Revised March 1983 L. AKE WASHINGTO N - 1 IN 1 � ••• e _° • . . • . . . . . . . . . . Tom, . . . . . boa - i t t F ti � f w.oI Ir m A .wn.I.screw aso/.w.oevnowm rooe wrw rai waawr umem000w sin � ` e �. owcwwwoe P... ACCOM a n r,' : MK wa COoC N C •ww COIewClww fa•'DJ.r Pop*who To wan •.�. [ `uwewlwdNw rowtw i �� _ rowew•wwrssowrawf�ocwna✓ -pDb- II \ R111T[D ETEU COPPER ROlTI ��_.— �+^' JI I \ CORRUGATED METAL OR ' ACCO EL R T ARCNffEGTLIRAL ERICY WALL - / j],/LIIORIDc EON�EE CNL.ORxE rOWOOM O 000E �--CKORK xJECTgN IYQ \ POOL ' RLLLORONtWL I{ CNLLOORRR! mm ROOM { �\ RDDM x'Yx'ax' � x'YtA'YtA. I I xAFu YIf % ' I nuomDE Lom 116E daCl�l! WAEIefE I ' i �_ •1'0r o sEenEr _ y r a tr a w . r a w a w -#iF-- _� I ADYITRIRunoN ErstEr \ ----COMLtgLCeRe1 a/ORAOa \ tF011K ri11 ACCE53 DOOR TO \ ww Row \ \`� OAtW[D UNDER FLOOR tR/1Y �`.. \ \\ \,/ --\ E O M WTTN GRATE TOR REMOVE�RDDF-_UCTM ` \ //RUIN ROOM \ • II AACESI--- wYat'Yx' /r-r m '/ / rc WILL Ma rig r�� GCnt No / \ \ `,. ,PAU LINFf TO AMER a �— REtEovEAaLa WA"EacTlott L —_----� FIGURE NO,t (3 RULCEE{— . I /l Q_ITION a _1 F' - y L E/'1LIPMENT --- REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVI ON: n c ® APPROVED PROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED DATE: z-/-/''� S GNATURfi F D RECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1082 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: 00 10(p APPROVED ❑ APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ❑ NOT APPROVED fR6 PRoPtaED 731Ku(.-IUR6 U-)Iw G0MPLIPAElv1 T14e e-l1511A)G lrlUiZTY PARK FHCILI-(1627 DATE: I'2'7' eo SIGNATURE OF ECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 6/1042 Form 18' REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION; RLiC Y bFVELaftm 6n T El'APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED DATE;_ 3 6 REVIEWIN6 DEPARTMENT/DIVJKON: 7 )3f1/< E. k �q [3-APPROVED rlAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS u NOT APPROVED 1-, ''• L " �:- '� DATE: Jy SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISICNI E/1�E2 Form 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: ` 5 APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS El NOT APPROVED DATE: SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1902 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: & 7L>AA4-1A/E,6oitiVC ® APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NQT APPR37ED T LW Alum-wATER R wo IAR ANNU m s:; : .� IJO MW IINUIN I CRAR.E WUL, go Snit tE HEE Z - -- rr[RRNM=Wuel,.. R2E-WAM No .RCIR�m- '.rr-SEWS' W urEmo um MAY po vpE Ntm m. :... /T1 t mmsIN. �o riRcl, rrulrsn REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: +/ D-APPROVED PROVED WITH CONDITIONS 0 NOT APPROVED DATE: SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHOR?ZED REP ESENTATIVE --� REVISION E/19E2 �� p p� Fom 18' ry Lr, O REVIEW I G DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: o )��1`�-- APPROVED ❑ APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED Oel���n IooKJ good . ��i}-Y DATE: J1� SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 51I982 i'�no 1B_ REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED ❑ APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED DATE: SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OF RE, • Al Z PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT i _ MAINTENANCE DIVISION FIN*- 3566 N.E. :ND STREET RENTON, wABN1NGTON 88058 9 y P �TEh SEctE� BARBARA Y.SHNPOCM MAYOR January 14, 1987 Puget Sound Power 4 Light Co. 620 Grady Way Renton, WA 98056 RE: SECONDARY METERING AT WELL $3, METER 1Z25349784 Dear Sir: On April 10, 1986 the City ct Renton requested your services to help us locate an electrical problem with our Well f3 at the Liberty Park station. Your service man confirmed that we had a problem with the transformers, but said that the City owned the transformers and we would have to effect the repairs ourselves. I then contacted your engineering department and asked for some information on replacing the City's old transformers with Puget Power transformers and eliminate the primary metering. Due to scheduling problems, we opted to replace the existing transformers and retain the existing service. While reviewing the power bills for Reiton's pump stations, I noticed that it seems we are being charged for secondary metering at Well 13, Meter IZ25349784. I have compared our pump stations with primary meter rater against those with secondary meter rates and have come to the conclusion that the City is now and has been overcharged at the referenced meter. I would appreciate it if you would review your records. If my suspicion is confirmed, a r, bate or adjustment in our billing seems alpropriate. Sincerely, t Ray JSlad Water Maintenance Supervisor RS/Ijf CC: Ron Olson Tarry Warren ENDING QF FIL TITLEFILE � Sufpky Sou eS 6SfR-9 (JeCL � 3 Qe6aniL � + a-h' °N �si9N