HomeMy WebLinkAboutWTR2700748 W-748 East Perimeter Rd-Airport 1
kr3
{J
S'S
BEGINNING
OF FILE
r
FILE TITLE
i
U
.�
y
s
r�
'y �, „ wn+awaay.wwwwwwrway...w... _^-M4-•.- rflL: A p ..._... M, .....+wmmem' �'._�,,�-,
- CITY OF RENTONv WASHINGTON
EWIROMTAL CHECKLIST F=
FOR OFFICE USLONLY _
Application he.
Environmental Checklist No. I� ...,
PRUPUSED, data: FINAL. date:
Doclu'atiun of Significance ID Declaration of Significance
Declaration of Non-Significance 0 Declaration of Non-Significance -. .,
COMMENTS:
1
Introduction lbe Stat+ Environmental Policy Act of 1911. Chapter 43.21C. RCM, requires
a s a e and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their
own ac , +s and when licensing private proposals. The Act also requires that an EIS be
prep-.od tu. ;'1 major actiors significantly affecting the quality of the environment.
. purpose of to 2 ..hecklist is to help the agencies involved determine rnether or not a
proposal is such a major action.
Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information
presently available to you. Where exo Fanations of your answers are required, or where
you believe an explanation would be nelpful to gnvernment decision makers, include your
explanation in the space provided, or use additlonal pages if necessary. You should `
include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are role-
vent to the answer's you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all
' agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review . -h-
oot unnecessary delay. l .
The following questions apply to your total proposal, not just to the license for which
you are currently applying or tha proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers 4i
should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed,
even though coaipll•tion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow atl
of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with-
' out duplicating paperwork in the future.
NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State
of Washington for various types of proposals. Many of the questions may not apply to
your proposal. If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the
next question. '2
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
1. BACKGROUND „A
1. Name of Proponent City of Renton Public Works Department
2. Address and phone number of proponent:
200 Mill Avenue South
Renrnn- WA 990gq
3. Date Checklist submitted December 28, 1983
a. Agency requiring Checklist Build lag sinning Dan,. - far' elf Aentnn
S. Name of proposal, if applicable
East Side Perimeter Road Reconstruction and Waterma in Installation
6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its
site, oneral dosign el cents, and other factors that will give an accurate
unders.anding of its scope and nature):
Reconstruction of the existing East Perimeter Road and installation of a
xv.,
watermain along the east side of the Renton Municipal Airport. The
road grade will be raised in spots to an average height of approximately
24'. Small storm drafnate improvements will be Included.
pK
,
,
1. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as well v h#
m� is the extent of the land area affected by any en vlrpn een tal ImPa cis, Including
1 any other ,nforma Lion needed to give an accurate understanding of the env l ran-
eental setting of the proposal): r•;
A4nton Airport, southeast side iT bpi '
a.
' nLr
4 k`
ilMnr
6. Estimated date for completion of the proposal: i3{•f^� +�+, w
i
Auoust. 1484 is
7 "
9. List of all permits, licenses or government approvals required iei the proposal e.
(federal , state and local--including rezones): V �•` ^,,.
Dint. nf Game - Ficheri % Hydraulic Permit
City of Renton - Shorelines
10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity
related Lo a connected with this proposal? If yes, explain:
No
11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by
your proposal? ]a yes, explain:
No
12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro
-
Ads if none has been completed, but it expected to be filed at some future
date, describe the nature of such application form:
I
If. FN v1RON MEN TAL IMPACTS
(Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required)
(1) Earth. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes In geologic
substructures? X
(b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or over-
covering of the so 11? X
Wr RUR W
(c) Change in topography or ground surface relic!
fee Lur"? X
VET_ Nx16}: NU_
(d) The destruction, covering or modification of any
uniqu„ geologic or physical features? X
T— ffim Nr
(0) Any Increase in wind or water erosion of sells,
either on or off the site?
TM RUR AT'
(f) ChOne" in deposition or erosion of beach &ands, or
changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which
may modify the channel of a river or stream or the
404 of the ocean or any bey, inlet or lake? X
i
j~31;i ti b: M_ RM wr
r .
isl �
1w
3-
I i
(L) Air. Will the proposal result in:
is) Air .missions or deterioration of ambient air
quality? X
M— RMT FIT—
(b) The creation of objectionable odors? yy
11.4 MATpL TU
(C) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature,
or any change to climate, either locally or '•'
reel one l l Y? X
YLS MAYbL NO
Lxnlanutiun:
(3) Water. Will the proposal result in:
(a) fllaeyes in currents, or the course of direction of
water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? X.
YLS MAYUL NU
(b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or
the rate and amount of surface water runoff? X
(c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? X
yFT RF96'C 11�
(d) Change in the amount of surface water to any water
body? M- Mun a
(e) Discharge into surface waters, or in Illy alteration
surface water quell ty, including but not limited to
temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? _ 1�0_
YES 1rA5tiE x _
(f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of
ground waters? X
VE?; RAi6F M5—
(g) Change In the quantity of ground waters, either
through direct additions or withdr,wals. or throeyyh
interception of an aquifer by cuts or exeav a tions? X
(h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through
direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate,
phosphates, detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria,
or other substances into the ground waters? _
� RAPBF yif6
(i) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available
for public water supplies? X
YM RATRT W
Explanation: Small on-site storm drains and oil separators will be Installed.
(e) Flora. Will the proposal result 1n;
(a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any
species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops.
microflora and aquatic plants)? X
TM RIM Rff
(b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or
endangered &pact as of fl ore? X_ X
(c) l,trroduction of new Species of flora into an area, or
in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing
spec its?
1ES- RAt1E
(d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop?
faytisDasi gn: Barren areas will be seeded with grass, total pavement area
will generally not be changed.
t
_a.
(5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in:
n
(a) Chaany spa In the flue rs lty of eyecles, or numbers of
any species of Ia una (bf rds. land animals including
reptiles, fish and shellfish, berth lc organisms,
insects or microfauna)? X
a
(b) Reduction of the numbers Of any unique, rare or
endangered species of fauna? X
(c) Introduction of now species of fauna into an area,
or result in a barrier to the migration or movement
Of fauna? X
FET Fi1CFSE
(d) Ueteriorotton to existing fish or wildlife habitat? X
FIT GlCM FF-
Explanation: -
-- 3
_ 1
(6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? X
TIT- WA'9E Fti-
Explanation:
(7) a ht and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or
g a-__�---- '.
l a IET RI<YBC N'0-' ` a
Explanation:
(8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the
Present or planned land use of on ores? X
Explanation: Protect roadway E we grmsins will servev Airport
development.
ri
(9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? X
F!F- NltF6€ AS-
(b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource?
" PLS- RiFRE
Explanotion:
(]0) Risk Of Ups•t. poet the proDosel involve a risk of an
but or the rel seem of hazardous substances (including,
but not llwite0 to, oil, pot ticitlse, chewicalf or radiation)
I- the event o� an accldset or upset conditions? xx
FLS' RA71L R�
Explanation:
(I1) Pyp�l eqi pp, W111 the proposal olter the location, distri- `--
oftiann—a-reeaa?N ty, or growth rate of the human population
x
FLT nTFr R'6'
Explanation: —
�..,,
µ .
t.
(12) RoViling. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or
create a demand for additional housing? X 5
fm RA'YeE R�
t xo lane ttvn:
ki
la
(Ia) irY ns_LprtatI 2n/Ci rcuI at fan. Will the proposal result in: .L.
(a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? X
(b) Etlects on existingg TLT M�YT Ai-
for new parking facilities, or demand 4'.
parking? ](� -
Y-ES7 NTiifiE 110
lc) ImPaiL uPon exist+ny LronsporLatlun systanist
(d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or `J^"
` movement of people and/or goods? X
_
TEg' MAYFE NO
(a) Alterations to waterbonie, rail or air Lraflic? X
PES- RARE R6'
(f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles,
bicyclists or pedestrians: y�
yES— IfAyuL Np
Explanation: Roadway improvements are limited to pavement and drainage
reconstruction, no Increase in roadway capacity Is Included.
(14) Public Services. dill the proposal have an effect upon, or
rt 7Tf t a need for new or altered governmental services
in any of tee following areas:
(a) Fire protection? X
YES R�CybE F5
(a) Police prztection? X
YES RAYEE W
(c) schools? X
YES RAPES RS
(d) Parks or other recreational facilities? _ X
PET RAP6F RS
(0) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? xx
PEs RAiBE M�
(�) other governmental services? TM RMT
Explanation: The new watermain and fir, hydra is 111 improve fire
protection for the area.
(!5) Ent ryy.. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X
PFE- RAT&L a)
(b) Obviate uyon existing sources of energy, or require
the doveRopment of new sources of energy? X
YES Run RS
E xpldnBL ion:
(1u) dt11!i el will the proposal result in a and for new
Sys:n:, or alterations to the t011ew i no utilities:
(a) Power or natural gam? X
YES AAPiE RS
(b) comaun/cad ens systems?
<f
. (c) Nate,? X
t NAY NC No
I
si Alt
Ik �
Y.til i
-e-
A) Sewer' or septic tanks? X
ie) Sturm1 water drainage?
Fm NKITL b
if) Solid west, and dispnsal? X
Y'ES NArp r NU
Exjdnation: This project', 12" watermain will improve the water system
on the Airport.
(17) IlunWn Il,ra Iin. Mill the pr D.Dsal result in lAe treatiun of
any nealth-Wazard or potential health hazard (excluding
mental health)? X
YY3- RATRE' Rr
C xD an at on:
(18) Aesthetics. Will the Proposal result in the obstruction of ---
Any scan c vista or view open to the public, or will the
proposal result 1n the re
r, of an aesthetically offensive
site open to public view?
TS NAYvt N'r -
a.
LILlanation: The barren areas will be grass seeded and leveled with top soil.
( (19) Nacre liOon. Will the Proposal result in an impact upon the
quo or quantity Of existing recreational Opportunities? X
TM RAYff
Crpl_a patio n: Temporary construction impacts may limit the use of the East +"y
Perimeter Road by walking and running people for several month!, but can -fr
continue after construction.
(20) Air he to is 1 R1 t rl 1. M111 the proposal result 1n an
a elf r•t�On o • s gn cant archeological or historiu4
site. structure, obJect or building? X
TM Run— R6
Explanation: The river_ yank he, hjCn radically modified here, no past
.iu•ein; has revealed archeological sties, the Black River Channel Iles _
about 2,000 yards south along Airport Way.
III. SIGNATURE !
{
r I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above Information ....i
1s true and comp late. It is understood that the Lad agency may withdraw any decla-
r+tlon of non-siyniftu ncr that it might issue in reliance uyon this cAecklist should there be any willful ■i srepresentation or willful (Lck o/Mull disclosure on my part.
Proponent: lit La ! ]/,. �•,jfJy`
a one
Robert E. Rerga trom. P.E.
(n•N pr II.
to ..
k
an J 1 M