Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
WTR2700858
W 858 Airport-West Perimeter Rd. Watermain ix BEGINNING OF FILE FILE TIME Air porE — West -?ert i'Aeker �'fioad waferwin op dw CLt I I t fiblimow E n9inee �� n9 rv�ee�s CITY OF RENTON MATERIALS ISSUED S.o.N.. WATERWORKS UTILITY TO STOREKEEPER. D.L. .rb bll.rmq n.:abrnlb /ri e'r/ / A it / AZ, oUANT UNIT A^COUNT MATERIAL UNIT AMOUNT DEVVERED NJMlER COST L Ab.w rn.Nna r.<.iwd in RoW aardBi.n A►.v.rgVniF.n filbd►v f A►w.�w4l.rd.r.d►y Sip..._ It Sl,..d_ DBMS 13,17711114111 i STATE OF WpSHINGTON ` STATE OF WpSN'NGI PN DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL AND HEALTH SERVICES DEPARTMENT Of SOCIAL AND HEALTH SERVICES 4yATER BACTERIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS I WATER BACTERIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS bbAMPLL WLLII110N FLAG INSI RUC IONP, 77 BACK OF GOLULN400 CUPv {{{ AMF_ �ULLLCIiCN READ INSI NUC TUNS UN BACK OF GOLOENROO COPY If instructions are not followed,samPle will be rejected, t It instructions are not followed,;ample will be rejecttM. IN DATE COLLECTED TIME COLLECTED COUNTY NAME i DATE COLLECTED TIME COLLECTED COUNTY RAME MONTH DAY YEAR I MONTH DAY YEAR Z ` d' CAM Q PM I /sL! i Ly nM Q PM TYPE OF SYSTEM IF PUBLIC SYSTEM.COMPLETE: TYPE OF SYSTEM IF PUBLIC SYSTEM.COMPLETE: Ic I.D.No. 7 AnE.lAssPUBLIC ❑ INDIVIDUAL ! O L 2 3 / ❑ ❑ INDIVIDUAL I.D. No. 'j / - `' �- J,2L 3i IFMM W,IY 1,Nq.Ml1 2 1 .WMN NAME OF SYSTEM NAME OF SYSTEM II SPECIFIC LDG ON WHERE SAMPLE COLLECTE SYS1E OMER/MGR. M E A16�OIE M) SPECIFIC LOCATION WHERE SAMPLE L'OLUCR SYSTEM OAIMFI OR NAME AND TELERENE NO ,h.nCMn IM U wMM Ixe N.Ian,IW,M1n1 Iw.ftY w a kYY4.M MNbn hNtlMN xY7 _ .Srrf /,iri $� 1/Valc xy7- :`7'4 1744co SAMPLE COLLECTED BY:(Hemel SAMPLE COLLECTED BY:INamH SOURCE TYPE + L SOURCE TYPE• r�Tl ,L, Q SURFACE ❑ WELL ❑ SPRING ❑ PURCHASED COMBR:ATION COMBINATION Y or OTHER '7 Q SURFACE ❑WELL ❑ SPRING ❑ PURCHASED UY or OTHER SEI'j Q QREPORT TO:(hint Fun Name•Add-e..and Z,P Codei SEND REPORT'O: Inl Fwl Nama,aderaas and LP cW 1 T ! J1, 0 _ _ WASHINGTONLy.0 _�G- __�WASWNGTLN — TYPEOFSAMPLE - TYPF OF SAMPLE -- 'YCn.c.umr Me �mn .•wmm ilx.aY.a m Ime cwun,x 1. Q DRINKING WATER ❑ ChI0"netedlRe3ldU4:_Total_Free) 1. [] DRINKING WATER �QI CnloNnaled lResWua7`_Total__Freel check Ireatmepl—) Q Fillered C"Ck treatment—) LJ Filtered ❑ Untreated or Omar ❑ Untreated Au Omer 2. ❑ PAW SOURCEWATE — 2. Q RAW SOURCE WATER — 3. CAI. 4M CONSTRUCTION or REPAIRS 3, Q'TIEW CONSTRUCTION or REPAIRS 4. ❑ OTHERISPecity) 4. ❑ OTHER(Spedlyl _ COMPLETE IF THIS SAMPLE IS A CHECK SAMPLE COMPLETE IF THIS SAMPLE IS A CHECK SAMPLE PF1611O S A I MEVIPII$LAB NO PREVIOUS SAMPLE COLLECTION DA _ PREVIOUS SAMPLF COLLECTION DATE_. REMARKS'. �— REMARKS'. ^_-- - LABORATORY RESULTS IFOR LAB USE ONLY) LABORATORY RESULTS 6OR LAB USE ON.Y) MEN COLIFORM STD PLW"OUNT SAMPLE NOT TESTED MPH COLWORM STD PLATE COUNT SAMPLE NOT TESTED i BECAUSE. ia, BECAUSE'. Q SamPle Too Old n w. ❑ Sam I AIPN DILUTION•' TEST UNSUITABLE MPN DILUTION FT--E��ST UNSUITABLE F e Too Old /100 ml 1. ❑ Conlluem Growth ❑ Nol In Proper Contains, �—/'w mI 1. 0 Coo,iont Growth ❑ Nat In Proper Container MF COLIFORM MF COLIFORM ff--tt 2. TC InsWliosnl Inlarmehon 2. LJ TNTC Q IneulDclenl Intormalion ,'4 Ptovlded—Please Read /1OOm Pluvlded—Please mead nslructions on Farm Form FECAL COLIFORM 3. ❑ Excess Dsbris t FECAL COLIFORM 3• � Ewes;Debris Instructions on ❑ MPH ❑ MF 4 ❑ MPH ❑ MF 4 /100 m+ t FOm NKING WATER SAMPLES ONLY,T'HES11 SULIS ARE: t FOR O"KING WATER SAMPLES ONLY,THESE RESULTS ARE: SATISFACTORY ❑ UNSATISFACTORY Q SATISFACTORY Q UNSATISFACTORY [ SEE REVERSE SIDE OF GREEN COPY FOR EXPLANATION OF RESULTS SEE REVERSE SIDE OF GREEN COPY FOR EXPLANATION OF RESULTS t u♦lNO. GATE.TIME RECEIVED— RECEIVED BY LW 070. OATS.TIME RECEVED-- RECEIVED eY OAT EPORTFO',ILABORATORY- I DA�Tf REPORTED LABORATORY ly ^Y REMARKS REMARKS I WATER SUPPLIER COPY r, WATER SUPPLIER COPY as DSNS 13.1731R I41` '.. DSHS 111I31R1811 STATE OF WASHINGTON �� J T 3 STATE OF WASHINGTON ( j � 1 II DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL AND HEALTH SERVICES .. DEPARTMENT OF SOCNIL AND REALTF 1 SERVICES Or ATER BACTERIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS WATER BACTERIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS AMPLE COLLECTION. READ INSTRUCTIONS ON BACK OF GOLDENROD COPY :,AMPLE COLL ECI ION- READ INSTRUCTIONS ON BACK Of GOLDENROD COPY If instructions are not followed•sample will be rejected. if Instructions are not followed,Semple will be rejected. .: DATE COLLECTED TIME COLLECTED COUNTY NAME „DATE COLLECTED TIME COLLECTED COUNTY NAME MONTH DAY YEAR _ t40),F YEAR �. ('�M ❑ PM6TYPE OF SYSTEM IF PUBLIC SYSTEM,COMPLETE. EM IF PUBIIG SYSTEM.COM IC1C.E CLASS L rE F CLASS NDIVIDUAL D. No. -`/ / e O ` 2 3 4LD. No. j SAL - 3 4 ncn NAME OFSYSTEM NAME OF SYSTEM -' Ice-, J0 Y s.J SY t3 �n/:• % SPECIFIC LOCA ION WHERE SA COLLECTE SYShM ORRIER/Mpl MAE AND/BERIOIYF ND. SPECIFIC LOCAiIpR WHERE SAMPLE COLCECTE SY5 OYMER�AND SIONOE NO IM'Al.M tl¢MVl un elugn,rrymunl ln.blaMn Iw a K"n001 n 4.Ign.IOVngxh /-/.d/G, -w — l SAMPLE COLLECTED BY:1Nve ii SAMPLE COLLECTED BY:purest eaF SOURCE TYPE C✓!��^ . SOURCE TYPE ..I C BINATIDN ❑ N +�SURFACE ❑ WELL ❑ SPRING ❑ PURCHASED ❑ JATION or ❑ ❑SURFACE WELL SPRING PURCHASED ryeCOpB OTHER 'I SE AID REPORT If*(MM F.11 Nang.AddrpF and zip tout $E D REPORT TO:IPriM Fuel Name.Add,eee aeM lip DaMI r, e ,,- 12 / WASHINGTON TYPE OF SAMPLE TYPE OF SAMPLE InMc.OMY uv in IIX.fNNnnl iCMc.Mir oro+n IMI CduinM 1• ❑ DRINKING WATER ❑ Chlorinated PteMnla l;__Total_Free) 1. [� DRINKING WATER Q.Chlorinated(ReeiduaC__Total—Freel Check treatment--W Q Fllle Check treatment ► Q FII1WeZII- Q Unbnaled or Other Q Untreated or Other - Y. Q RAW SOURCE WATER Y. ❑ RAW SOURCE WATER 3. (Q-IYf'v�CONSTRUC rION or REPAIRS 3. U-•MEW CONSTRUCTION or REPA'RS 4. ❑ OTHER ISpecily) t 4, ❑ OTHER(Specify) COMPLETE IF THIS SAMPLE is A CHECK SAMPLE i COMPLETE IF THIS SAMPLE IS A CHECK SAMPLE PREVIOUS LAB NO PW 1'DUS LAB NO PREVIOUS SAMPLE COLLECTION DATE _ PREVIOUS SAMPLE COLLECTION DATE REMARKS. REMARKS. ----LABORATORY RESULTS(FOR LAB USE ONLY) 1 LABORATORY RESULTS IFOR LAB USE ONLY) MPN COLIFORM STD PLATE COUNT SAMPLE NOT IESTED COLIFORM STD PLATE COUNT SAMPLE NOT TESTED BECAUSE: BECAUSE. MPN DILUTION a TEST UNSUITABLE ❑ Sample Too Old MPN DILUTION TEST UNSUITABLE ❑ Semple Too Old .I �OO ml 1. ❑ Confluent Orow(h Q Not In Proper Container /tGO ml 1. ❑ Conlluent Growth ❑ Not m Proper Container MF COLIFORM Mf COLIFORM Z. Q TNTC Ineut0Uenl ln!ormenon AGO m Q Provided-Please Read Z• ❑ TNTC Q InevideleM leaseInfor Pb. d Inlia,mlions on Form >'tKt"^ Peoeided-Please Form FECAL COLIFORM 3. U E+Cass Debris 3. Q E.cese Debris Instruclione on Fam FECAL COLIFORM ❑ MPN ❑ MF 4. Q-A Q C MIN C ME 4, ❑ ^_ Q �10o mI /1 00 ml FOR O KING WATER SAMPLES ONLY,THESE RESLK TS ARE. FOr;D NKING WATER SAMPLES ONLY.THESE SUL FS ARE SATISFACTURY ❑ UNSATISFACTORY M SAT(SFACTCRY ❑ UNSATISFACTORY 1 SEE REVERSE SIDE OF GREEN COPY FOR EXPLANATION OF RESULTS SEE REVERSE SIDE OF GREEN COPY FOR EXPLANATION OF RESULTS LADINO DAIE TIME RECEIVED- RECEIVED BY _ LABNO. DATE.TIME RECEIVED- REh1VED BY DATEREPORTED rJ 7 440RATOnY GATFAEPORTEO O} LASORATORY REMARKS CJ REMARKS `j/ WATER SUPPLIER COPY WATER SUPPLIER COPY ms IRK 1 _. -- DSHS 13173IRl411 OWS 13-173(Mao STATE OF WASNINGTON �I STATE OF WASHINGTON I DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL AND HEALTH SERVICES W BACTERIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS RVICES WATER BACTERIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS i.AMPLE CULLLCTIDN READ INSTRUCIIUNS ON BACK OF GOLDENROD COPY 4AMPLE COLLECTION, READ'NSIIiUC(IUNS ON BACK OF GOLDENROD COPY If Instructions are not followed,sample will be relocted. If Instructions are not followed,sample will be relacted. is TIME COLLECTED COUNTY NAME i DATE COLLECTED TIME COLLECTED COUNTY NAME A DATE COLLECTED '.{ moNTH DAY YEAR _ MOUTH DAY YEAR Co' M ❑ PM �C. /'f.� ' TYPE OF bVSTEM IF PUBLIC SYSTEM.COMPL.ET� ��T�YYP.�PE��OF SYSTEM IF PUBLIC SYSTEM,COMPLETE: OMCLF CLASS M-<"BLICIICLr CLASS ( Ic LD. No. '1 ,• 4 L 2 9 4 I.D.D No. , 3 a oilNDIVIDUAL INDIVIDUAL uW.M avr+,..e.nce I 1._.a+r+,^•^unor - NAME OF SYSTEM NAME OF SYSTEM 'i'G/LJ ` SPECIFIC LOCATION WHERE$AMPLCCOILECR 8YS1AE d/akI/MMjik L AND TF181EOIE NO SPECIFIC LOCATION WHERE SAMRP CDLLECTE SY6ILTA R/MGR-NAMEMOTBENpE W SPECIFIC CIF IC,LOCATION W WHERE "I MUL VO M\,ICMn l.p f r�IgU+.1„�.NIiW,lwnlultl I s> 7 . r — R- SAMPLE COLLECTED BY:(Nama) SAMPLE COLLECTED BY:thleviel SOURCE TYPE L - SOURCE TYPE y1 C%044,TION MRMATION SURFACE ❑WELL ❑ SPRING PURCHASED rOTHER ❑ SURFACE ❑ WELL ❑SPRING ❑ PlIR0MA4iED OTHER SEVD REPORT TO:(Pant Full Name.AedraH sad ZIP Cadal 8fi D EPORT TO:IPrIM Full Name.Addwsa� x 40e 21p CPtla) — � T' L.1T/ .E7 US T/1 WASNINJTJN _ � TYPE OF SAMPLE WASHING rnN' TYPE OF SAMPLE 2nwn o w one n ^w aw+l+m IGMcr unrr dM in IM.cduTn+ l Tolal_Free+ ❑ ChlonnalediResidual._Total—Free1 1. � DRINKING WATER ❑ Chlor.nated(Resltlual._. 1. ❑ DRINKING WATER I check treatment---)t ❑ Filleted Check treatment--# ❑ Fdtelsd ❑ Untreated or Otho' ❑ Untreated or Other_ 2. ❑ RAW SOURCEINATER 2. ❑ RAy, .SOURCE WATER $, Tr `W CONSTRUCTION or REPAIRb +, 3. Lg'NEW CONSTRUCTION or REPAIRS 4. LJ OTHER ISpecDYl _ ,E 4. ❑ OTHER(Specify) GJMPLETE IF THIS SAMPLE IS A CHECK SAMPLE =1 COEAPIETE IF THIS SAMPLE IS A CHECK SAMPLE •REFIOUS I AS NO PREVIOUS LAB NO PREVIOUS SAMPLE COLLECTION DATE -- Pq IOUS SAMPLE COLLECTION DATE REMARKS, R Rh MARKS. 44 LABORATORY RESULTS(FCR LAB USE ONLY) LABORATORY RESULTS IFOR LAB USE ONLY) M N COLIFORM STE)PLATE COUNT SAMPLE NOT TESTED M GOLIFURM STD PLATE COUNT SAMPLECAUSEESTED — BECAUSE' /n+l �/51oM.aonNM /!PI 5 mw.v<serr ❑ Sampla Too 41d -MPN DILUTION TEST UNSUITABLE ❑ Sample Too Old - MPN DILUTION TEST UNSUITABLE ��ml /00 in: 1. ❑ Confluent Growth ❑ Net in propel Container 1. ❑ Confluent GroWlh ❑ Not m Pmper Conlanel MF COLIFORM MF COLIFORM 2. ❑.TNTC ❑ IneuWlclenl InlomMtiw 'L, ❑ TNTC ❑ IneUXlclenl lnlarntallnn Provided—Please Rand /p n Provided—Please Read X W Inshuctlons on F.m Ieslluclions on Form 3. ❑ EKcuss Debits FECAL COLIFORM 3. ❑ Eaeess Debits FECAL COLIFORM ❑ MPN ❑ MF ❑ MPN ❑ MF 4 ❑4 El [3 AWMI "++•'-�� ❑ ef Fony NKING WATER SAMPLES ONLY,THESE SULTS ARE: FOR DR KING WATER SAMPLES ONLY.THESE LILTS ARE: C1 SATIurw:TORY ❑ UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY ❑ UNSATISFACTORY SEE REVERSE St:E OF GREEN CUPY FOR EXPLANATION OF RESULTS SLE REVERSE SIDE OF GREEN COPY FOR EXPLANATION OF RESULTS RECBIVEO BY LAB O DATE,TIME RECEIVED- RECEIVED eY LAB pAl L,TIME RECEIVED-- M Yr . W, _ p LkaORATORN ( i D� LABORATg1Y: Ir. `•./'1 t REMARKS 6' iHWRK6 WATER SUPPLIER COPY m. WATER SUPPLIER COPY m. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON APPLICATION ONLY - UNTIL VALIDATED NUMBER NUMBER Owner Location of work Address & INSPECTIONS FEES Sewer CONSTRUCTION Side s SO• °`' — $,OLm Sewer Right-of-Way Construction PERMIT — SP. Utility Conn. Fee - Water (Pullic Right-of-Way) Water Latecomer Fees Water Insp./Approval Fees Sp. Utility Conn. Fees - Sewer Sewer Latecomer Fees Sewer Insp./Approval Fees Date Issued Inspection Fees ;j Special Deposit - CASH BOND Expiration Date TOTAL FEE n,nunn Desc Numb r 'O"r of Work and uer cf F et g a�.,l. L.-,-C_ 1+ c..(., n, Oo Contractorf �' _ Business / l r n_* "i -Z.[.''�- License (_./� !�t4 A e�.f ^Address n� , � L � ul Bond ( Telephone IT IS UNDERSTOOD THAT THE CITY OF RENTON SHALL BE HELD HARMLESS OF ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, LAMAGE OR INJURY ARISING FROM THE PERFORMANCE OF SAID WORK. ANY WORK PERFORMED WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY OR ON SEWER MAIN MUST BE DONE BY A LICENSED, BONDED CONTRACTOR. LOCATE UTILITIES BEFORE EXCAVATING. CALL 235-2631 FOR INSPECTION. ✓f/`�7 Call between 8 AM and 9 AM for APPLICANT �!p),1. inspection in afternoon; call .i before 12 Noon the day before for inspection in morning. PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR SPECIFY TIME FOR INSPECTION. CALL 235-2620 for st-eec signs CALL BEFORE YOU DiG BY (, t� and lighting. 48-HOUR LOCATORS 1-800-424-5555 AUTHORIZATIIN Of SPECIAL BILLING DATE: /3 - v - 6 co PROJECT NAME: )p PROJECT NUMBER: L/- 8S6 5 Yf2 ¢ WORK ORDER NO. : 4 6i 8 / 4,5/ y It is the intent of this letter to authorize the City of Renton to bill the undersigned for all costs incurred relative to the above-referenced project, by the Citj of Renton for the following work: BILLING TO BE SENT TO: Name: 4 Xe,QY Address X`!V< Z yy. JAf City: o State: Z.C.Vro <`f' Atten: Phone No. : vner/ eve oper, contractor or Authorized Agent .r w West Hill 6PS 'r it r ,r r � � e i I }, r x ! I. Ir r� \ ,r Or �I 1ti� y S c Cj rrw e r J �r IV+I3 ! � ,r r I� a I or r 000. r----- �_� a•~ r w ,r M � r FANCHER FLYWAYS FIREFLOW ANALYSIS Analysis No. 1 with 12" West Perimeter Rd. Improvements Actual Capacity. 4704 gpm O 20 psi Derated Capacity. 3863 gpm 0 20 psi \ f. ,� \`r West Hill BPS g ,r e ,Y M e e , 1 o + tY r i 1 w e ` r F r e r Nw,m,.nm,ws r ,r r 1 3 r n-7 .3 a o _'a 1 ` ,r ,Y ,r -, w r an,r w Mr tY W ,r � mvT 1 asMa a�M 'i rIi ,r J it � I FANCHER FLYWAYS FIREFLOW ANALYSIS Analysis No. 1 with 12" West Perimeter Rd. Improvements Actual Capacity. 4704 gpm ® 20 psi Derated Capacity. 3863 gpm 0 20 psi COST IU1TA AND INY"10P SUBJECT: Re.ise.i .�,�„"�� 404PAOt CITY PROJECT NUMBERS: W- 81;_8 uruirr . ..oeeoc..cars _ S- S=2 4 NAME OF PROJECT TO: CITY OF RENTON FROM: UTILITIES DIVISION 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON WA 98055 DATE: Per your request, the following information is furnished concerning costs for improve- ments installed for the above referenced project. WATER SYSTEM: Length Size Type 2�cx> L.F. JF " ox WATERMAIN io L.F. OF F3 o- WATERMAIN Z L.F. OFr__ WATERMAIN L.F. OF WATERMAIN EACH OF i GATE VALVES EACH OF —" GATE VALVES EACH OF _" _ GATE VALVES �I Size Type SUBTOTAL S / S / ' EACH OF FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLIES $ (COST OF FIRE HYDRANTS MUST BE LISTED SEPARATELY). TOTAL COST FOR WATER SYSTEM $ SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM: Length Size Type L.F. OF `� puG SEWER MAIN 23(e cF of 4 " p L.F. OF eA✓G SEWER MAIN L.F. OF c:r SEWER MAIN EACH OF g DIAME ER MANHOLES TOTAL COST FOR SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM $ STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM: Length Size Type L.F. OF STORM LINE L.F. OF STORM LINE L.F. OF STORM LINE L.F. OF STORM LINE TOTAL COST FOR STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM $ STREET IMPROVEMENTS: (Including Curb, Gutter, Sidewalk) TOTAL COST FOR STREET IMPROVEMENTS $ _ /UZ 2 7 (SIGNATURE) (SIGNATORY MUST BE AUTHORIZED AGENT OR OWNER OF SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT) NOTICE OF NEW FIRE HYDRANT IN-SERVICE NAME OF DEVELOPMENT / /.! '< ! lil / j a ADDRESS I l i , INSTALLATION CONTRACTOR WATER PROJECT NO. NUMBER OF HYDRANTS HYDRANT LOCATIONS (FOR TIRE DEPT. USE ONLY) HYDRANT `Ki. 1. "- 2. - 3. 4. 5. 6. INSPECTOR OF Rp A. v PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT IN RICHARD C. HOUGHTON • DIRECTOR p MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH,98055 v4 206 235-2569 91rto SEPICOOP BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR MEMORANDUM DATE: August 6, 1987 TO: Dan Clements, Finance Director FROM: Ronald Olsen, Utility Engineering SUBJECT: Interfund Transfer Please make an interfund transfer in the amount of 00,000 for: Airport Watermain Project W-858 From Account No. 421/000/15.596.36.65(15) Water Utility To Account No. 402/000/15.596.46.63(35) Expenditure Credit 10, Ronald Olsen 2H.01.19.rlo:jlm Dates 10-Apr-87 City of Renton . Public Works Deaarteent Pages TO$ FINANCE DIRECTOR 7 FROM PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR CONTRACTORS Kohl Excavating Inc CONTRACT NO.CAB 073-86 ESTIMATE NO. 5 St rINAL PROJECTS Renton Municipal Airport West Parieiter Rd Water, Sewer, and Pave avmsasssassss�sssrovvnaaasscssss;syssyscvsnasssssssacvsssssasvc;assess;;c;vv; 1. CONTRACTOR EARNINGS THIS ESTIW-E $18,794.50 2. SALES TAX 4 0.08 $1,522.36 aaavavac;o a;aaa 3. TOTAL CONTRACT AMOUNT THIS ESTIMATE 620,316.86 4. EARNINGS PREVIOUSLY PAID CONTRACTOR $510,136.82 T. *EARNINGS DUE CONTRACTOR THIS ESTIMATE $17,854.78 6. SUBTOTAL - CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS $527,991.60 7. RETAINAGE ON PREVIOUS EARNINGS *26,849.30 S. **RETAINABE ON EARNINGS THIS ESTIMATE $939.72 __ ___________ 9. SUBTOTAL - RETAINAGE $27,789.02 10. SALES TAX PREVIOUSLY PAID *439495.87 11. SALES TAX DUE THIS ESTIMATE i1,522.36 12. SUBTOTAL - SALES TAX l45,018.23 (95X x LINE 1) vcaa_¢ac;ass;sra *w (RETAINAGE& 5%) GRAND TOTAL $600,798.85 C¢;asa;ssssa¢Qai;;vaaafa aaa;aaa aaa;;vsssa sassssastlst;ssssssysacvassysastasva FINANCE DEPARTMENT ACTIONS PAYMENT TO CONTRACTOR (Lines 5 and 11) v 1 ACCT.M *402/000/15.596.46.67.35 $2,603.27 N 5 It FINAL 2 ACCT.A •402/000.'15.596.46.63.36 $15,139.73 N 5 M FINAL 3 ACCT.• *402/000/15.546.46.63.38 $1,634. 14 N 5 019,377. 14 RETAINED AMOUNT (Line S) o 1 ACCT.N *402/000/15.596.46.63.35 $126.25 0 5 No FINIAL 2 ACCT.N *402/000/15.596.46.63.36 $734.23 41 5 1. FINAL 3 ACCT.N *402/000/15.5%.46.63.38 $79.24 A 5 --------------- $939,72 asssmaasssasssss TOTAL THIS ESTIMATE■ l20,316.86 CHARTER 116, LAWS 1963 CITY OF RENENTON CERTIFICATION ION 1, THE NKRS12KO NO NERFIY CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY, TMI THE MATERIALS NAVE BEEN FURNISNED, THE N+1� SERVICES RENCERED DN THE LABDR PERFORMED AS DESCAl1ED HEREIN, MID TNAT THE CLAIN IS A JUST, WE AND UNPA11 DRI6ATION ABAINBT THE CITY OF RENTON, AND TIMI I All AITNDRISEO TNENTIC ATE All) CERTIFY TO SAIL CLAIM NINO: `z;z— atm City of faata . PAlic lark+ De►rtaat p 1 9reiatt ttata%Wdpl Airw tad %neitr N War, Derr, arotrect Mabat GO 073-6 hetratm 0eb1 Frce►dtiy Ir Edirte Nobre S b F1NY Clrai.O 0etr. Mril /, 1w Ila or, DncriOtio T Irit Eat. Wt 7revion Previoa This This Tetd 76tal MD. I!. 2 Yoitit7 NO Watit7 crook Ilaatity Aant YiatitF Aeoot 01. 0 12 ied agile Ira Pip Used Foot 2675.00 30.00 BOA 70000.00 0.00 2b00.00 MN.00 Clam S2 OZ AS 0 inch Ductile Ira Pip Uanl Foot 30.OD 10.00 10.00 18D.00 0.00 10.00 100.00 Clam 52 O3. 65 1 ird Motile Ira hp Und FOUL 15.00 IL.OD 0.00 COO 0.00 0.00 LOD Class 2 04. 0 10 ied Motile Ira Pip 4i.ed Foot 210.00 60.00 21LOO 13050.00 0.00 ZLOO 1300D.06 Clue 52 00. AS 12 cad We Paled it wKk LOO 11M.00 3.00 NCO ON LOD 5650.0D cauNe Pelt 06. i0 10 ied site Pelee id *Ach 7.00 8DD.00 5.00 4250.00 0.00 S.00 /,'SO.OD Cat Ira iWvo An 07. A S iad W Staierd Fire skidoo ad 7.OD 1730.00 7.00 IM.00 0.00 7.00 12250.00 humbly 011. iS cnal twat@ Fcr Vat [Aic turd bO.uD S0.00 41.00 2050.00 100 01.00 2D00.00 Neckia0 09. LS tank PA Oraoci fr 00 IOb6.00 s.00 JOL.S1 I M06 0.00 1006.51 NP2.00 Trod ltaditll 10. 45 S70 iod Now Ov"Ibd Oce 2D0.00 12.00 StS.S2 OL24 0.00 WS2 4ML.24 fr Trod adfill ad Top corn 11. 6S MFbadt heat Clam O rl cia 114.00 SS.00 29195 1H67.25 5.00 MOO 29&95 IM.25 hoof MFhelt for irad hidiq 12. 65 Voter ,oviceTypIII elad 6.00 M.00 5.00 MOO 0.00 6.00 4500.00 IL 65 %wtical AOjoteot for StaOaW art Feet 16.00 350.40 4.00 1000.00 4.00 1000.00 "at Aaok17 Date: 09-1pr-97 C44 of Renton . PAIu Works Dgrtemt Pap: 2 Proxtt Wentm Municipal Airport West PriuGr RI Water, Sera, andCdntrart Mrbert 06 01316 Cactractur Kohl Escn 'Ang Inc Estimate Member: 51 FIM1l Closing Date. April 4, M ltem Bars Dewiption T lint Est. Nbit Previous Previous This This Total Total Mu. Ms. 1 Qtmtity Price Qtalt:ty Avant Qudity Ameuet Q,antity Amount 14. 65 fobilitation steep 9u 1.00 2500.DO LOD 25DO.00 Me 1.00 25W.00 IS. 65 Construction Staling and As-Bwlnep 9r 1.00 25N.00 0.30 125D.OD 0.50 1250.D0 I.00 2500.00 Notes 16 65 Finish ark Clem up p Sir 1.00 5000.00 0.00 4000.00 0.20 MOM I.00 SOOO.OD 17. 65 Hydro Seeding #Square Yard 700.00 2.00 711.00 1422.00 0.00 711.00 14ZLOD 18. 65 lww light Rip Rap 'Tm 46D.00 10.00 O.w 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 19. 65 Steel "Y4 Pipe 24 ind diam'Uneal Fact 16.00 200.00 40.00 %00.OD 0.00 46.00 %00.00 O.M inch mall thictrcss 20. 65 2 inch Air 1 Vacuume release 'Fxb 1.00 700.00 LLD 700.00 0.00 1.00 700.00 valve neiti Tim 21. 65 3 inch Diameter PVC Telemetry 'Lineal Pod 70.00 LOP 710.00 SHOD A00 740.00 M0.00 fandut SCA w 22. 65 Ttlwuy Pull Ox rtaci fro 230.00 7.00 1750.00 0.00 7.00 17%00 ZL 65 Top Sal miom IDA.00 I2.00 461.7D mw 0.00 461.70 55w.40 24. 65 Ctunge Cider B I Above! Fact 0.00 7.50 MOD 1012.12 0.00 MOO f012.30 3/4' Type K Dapper Water Servict lint From titer to Bldg Mtotal SdWale " A" IM,660.47 42,MLOD 4IM,0.47 L11 Salem Tas 415,03M 04.M 915,243.02 Total Schedule " A" VM,61L97 62,729.12 Mime �G OF RFfL 4 ;y z PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT DESIGN/UTILITY ENGINEERING • 235-2631 0 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON.WASH. 98055 A 0' AO�,rFD SEPISO';5 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR MEMORANDUM DATE: January 5, 1987 TO: Vince Lee, Airport Director FROM: Ronald Olsen, Utility Engineering SUBJECT: W-858, West Perimeter Road Participation in the Installation of 12" Watermain The utility Department agrees to participate in the installation of the 12" watermain, designated as W-858 West Perimeter Road Watermain, in the amount of $30,000. This installation benefits the Utility in many ways. It gives the much needed reliability to the West Hills Booster Pump Station, as well as is oversized to provide general benefit to the northwest portion of the City. *UaaldOls7n�- 2H.01.18.rlo-jlni WATER AND SEWER }'RO.IrCTS PRESENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION IN THE CITY OF rrNTON WATER PROJECT N k/- 858 SEWER PROJECT 0_5- 424 DATE__§-I24 g U94F-PROJECT TITLE ,iC oRc A Pfb�r PROJECT LOCATION /c' r , „eg A i'r� cT 5700 ,i.v DEVELOPER AUDRESS PHONE EMERGENCY PHONE CONTRACTOR ADDRESS y 7 U PHONE EMERGENCY PHONE C / _ p n FOREMAN ���� � ,i iq't h PHONE EMERGENCY PHOIIE City of Penton inspector 1r�` • L-u� 1,y "��eeMr — �„! 1 En L�1 Luc TUbormode& mow hmice 94J Suulh Fiaak�Stwel.kaak,WashtnVkw%98M (20617&-SW 00ni"MinobiaioV and Technical Services City of Renton Utility Engineer Invoice #100045 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 February 1t,, 198i For the analysis of WATER during the month of February, 1987 ---------------------------------$40.50 *8148004 thru 8148009 - WO 4818 (W858) X4n Glee r�c2�rcP r` u�. Wwa ur t�» CITY OF RENTON CERTIFICATION f r«E w+ RsarrD DD wERm eER-nfv uN o�i .•:V ,TV Of vERJYR'I. 0.v,CEf 11ENDFRW OD Tw! a fURN�gMED. TY1E DE •ND T"I FRECENED EN10KLND PIe,T1 TtNTICIdE C � 2 t9PT 7:T4c DIPT, E Net 30 Days iM aaN Maxry�'rMNr NPw�mrNf Iw eMN xerwe�x.'rtcMa'g Na,mx Ax^WxGs^ee .nct n�pmy in rort w Ne.rfmY xna, na!gacaeC,M arnwnx q Mrs imoicq $Gm(llfT TiY Of C.%MO!J\M ✓1MIH'9 VnNSt,.IM,w'i9B 1!1{.M610O w TO DATE //- Z G- 86 SCHEDULING AND NOTIFICATION REQUEST FOR PRE-CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE NAME OF PROJECT: REi4►TLh 0A 41 RLyc5 LZ YrI%_ e-S INSTALLATION: W - LOCATION: SOVTM i we31 PeR10- TEtZ It040s 1. Set Date THuR• _L/q4/ 6 __ and Time /0 : 10 f?" 2. Call Harriet in Mayor 's office to book Conference Room R p Floor 3. Notify Appointed Inspector L v hl oU 4. Notify Contractor/Developer t-- 044k Gxc.AyA--r vG /. 5. Fill out attached form, make appropriate number of copies, and route to City personnel pnjor to meeting date. Notify the following City Departments: Design Engineering _ ►� Fire Department _ ✓ Police Department V� Street Department �-- Traffic Department Utilities Department lam_ Water Shop Sanitary Sewer/Field Other A tt2 POP-T- n- rarLrar_ 6. Telephone the following outside companies: Phone Number Department of Transportation }64-Yt 37 40.44Z4 Pacific N.W. Bell Company —VA-969H Z W- 301L Puget Sound Power 8 Light Company 255-2464 X i399 4 1 Sf - Teleprompter Cable TV Company 433-3420 L 3St, l/ Washington Natural Gas Company 622-6767 x 249 Metro-Bus Routes 447-5859 (Mr. O'Brien or Mr. Nelson) Other ��pF_t.-+ G.r,..., C. N__ IE_L s91,L 2 1T- Zr I1 RH2 ENGINEERING, P. S. P. 0. BOX 1180 1410 MARKET STREET KIRKLAND, WASHINGTON 98033 Project'; 1162. 00. 00 FANCHER FLYWAYS FIREFLOW Invoice Nc,. 4064 Uctober 31, 1986 Page number 1 CITY OF RENTON 200 MILL AVE S RENTON WA 98055 1 2 1, -------------- FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES THROUGH OCTOBER 31. 1986 IN CONJUNCTION WITH FANCHER FLYWAYS FIREFLOW ANALYSIS. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES: ---- Hours Rate ArTiount PRINCIPAL E IX 3. 00 70. 00 210. 00 PROJECT ENGINEER E IV 12. 00 54. 00 648. 00 WORD PROCESSOR II . 50 28. 00 14. 00 -- 1 - SERVICES TUTAL: 15. 50 872. 00 872. 00 REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES: '"- Amount Copying - 1 . 80 Copying - 3 1. 00 Computer 12. 00 CAD SYSTEM 25. 00 PROF. LIABILITY INSURANCE 69. 76 REIMBURSABLE TOTAL: 108. 56 108. 56 Total Due This Invoice: 980. 56 1 40gV CHARTER 116, I.A�V: OF 196 CITY OF RENTON CERTIFICATION I, THE UNDERSIGNTO nP Hf Rr RY C.!NTIfV UNDER PEHATIT OF PCRNBI. 1II41 111C MATt.I.IALA NAVE IIEIN fURlllt Hlp. UIC SI DVIC,S NI " RI 11 OR IMF TAOOR PERIURMI.0 AV p1 SORIBI U MIR. IN. AND THAT THE CLAIM IS A JUST, DUE AND UNPAID OBLIGATION AGAINST THt CITY Of Nf NTON. AND THAT I AM AUTHORIZED TO AUTHENTICATE AND DERTIFV TO SAID CLAIM -12:! ,I `,yyyi PAYMENTS RECEIVED AFTER 10-31-86 NOT REFLECTED r�C � Prt}rr�7' 1�t3 Nc�t7�'tgtf i 51162 (RR/45) October 24, 1986 Engineering Mr. Ron Olsen CITY OF RENTON 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 subject: Fancher Flyways Fireflow Analysis Dear Ron: A comouter analysis of the City of Renton' s Water System was performed for the purpose of determining the available water supply to fight a fire at the site of the proposed hanger building additions by Fancher Flyways, Inc. , located in the southwest corner of the Renton Municipal Airport. This letter summarizes the results an(, procedures used to determine the fireflow capability of the City' s System to fight a fire at this location. This analysis was based on the existing City of Renton Water System, with the addition of a 12-inch watermain loop along the Airport' s west perimeter road. The Water System improvements modeled in the analysis consisted of a 12-inch extension beginning at the intersection of Lake Avenue South and Airport Way, north to the west perimeter road , west and north along this road to the existing I2-inch watermain adjacent to the West Hill Rooster Pump Station. The analysis results indicate that the fireflow capacity at the site of the proposed hanger additions is approximately 4,700 GPM at a residual pressure Of 20 psi in the main adjacent to the site. However, the velocity in the existing eight-inch diameter watermain on Lake Avenue South between Tobin Street South and Airport Way is in excess of eight feet per second . Although this flow rate is physically available, there are potentially dangerous consequences associated with allowing that flow rate to occur. Reduction of the velocity in this main to eight feet per second results in a reduced de-rated flow rate of approximately 3,863 gallons per minutes. Either of the following two alternatives would provide additional fireflow capacity: replacement of the existing eight-inch diameter watermain on Lake Avenue South with 12-inch diameter pipe, or extension of the proposed 12-inch diameter watermain east along the perimeter road to the existing eight-inch main in the Airport access road. Implementation of either alternative may reduce the high velocity observed in the existing eight-inch main on Lake Avenue South, consequently increasing the allowable fireflow, capacity to the proposed improvements . Tf either of these alternatives is considered, an additional fireflow analysis should be performed to determine the additional capacity availahle, 1410 Market Street,P.O. Box 1180,Kirkland,Washington 98033(206)827-6400 Mr. Ron Olsen October 24 . 1986 Page 2 The fireflow capahility for the analysis was based on the Insurance Service office' s (ISO) criteria, which is used by the Washington Survey and Rating Bureau, the local rating company. In accordance, with ISO criteria, the Water System was simulated experiencing a maximum day demand with th? single largest source of supply, Well R, out of service (e.g., due to failure, maintenance, etc.) . A summary of the operational conditions used in the analysis follows. o Minimum service pressure of 30 psi in service area during normal demands and 20 psi during fire demands o Wells 1, 2, and 3 are in operation while Well 8 is out of service o Springbrook Springs is supplying the Water System at 1 ,300 GPM The Talbot Hill Pump Station is in operation at 1 ,500 GPM o The Mt. Olivet Pump Station is operating at 1 ,700 GPM o The Windsor Hills Pump Station is operating at 1,950 f,PM o The '+Pst Hill Pump Station is operating at 1,200 GPM o The Talbot Hill Reservoir is in operation. A figure summarizing the fireflow analysis is attached for your reference. Copies of the computer analysis have been retained in this office for future reference.. If you hve any questions or comments regarding this analysis, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, RH2 ENGINEERING, P.S. Randy L. Asplund, P.E. cc: Mr. Vince Lee. Airport Director Enclosure I —N' Ir ur ,r v ,r ,r ,r i i Iw i � r ^ r ,r •_sir_ aww y„ r r FANCHER FLYWAYS FIREFLOW ANALYSIS Analysis No. 1 with 12" West Perimeter Rd. Improvements Actual Capacity. 4704 gpm ® 20 psi Derated Capacity. 3863 gpm ® 20 psi S1162 (RR/45) October 24, 1986 Engineering Mr. Ron Olsen 7 1986 CITY OF RENTON 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Subject: Fancher Flyways Fireflow Analysis Dear Ron: A computer analysis of the City of Renton' s Water System was performed for the purpose of determining the available water supply to fight a fire at the site of the proposed hanger building additions by Fancher Flyways, Inc., located in the southwest corner of the Renton Municipal Airport. This letter summarizes the results and procedures used to determine the fireflow capability of the City' s System to fight a fire at this location. This analysis was based un the existing City of Renton Water System, with the addition of a 12-inch watermain loop along the Airport' s west perimeter road. The Water System improvements modeled in the analysis consisted of a 12-inch extension beginning at the intersection of Lake Avenue South and Airport 'clay, north to the west perimeter road, west and north along this road to the existing 12-inch watermain adjacent to the West Hill Rooster Pump Station. The analysis results indicate that the fireflow capacity at the site of the proposed hanger additions is approximately 4,700 GPM at a residual pressure of 20 psi in the main adjacent to the site. However, the velocity in the existing eight-inch diameter watermain on Lake Avenue South between Tobin Street South and Airport Way is in excess of eight feet per second. Although this flow rate is physically available, there are potentially dangerous consequences associated with allowing that .low rate to occur. Reduction of the velocity in this main to eight feet per second results in a reduced de-rated flow rate of approximately 3,1153 gallons per minutes. Either of the following two alternatives would provide additional fireflav capacity: replacement of the existing eight-inch diameter watermain on Lake Avenue South with 12-inch diameter pipe, or extension of the proposed 12-inch diameter watermain east along the perimeter road to the existing eight-inch main in the Airport access road. Implementation of either alternative may reduce the high velocity observed in the existing eight-inch main on Lake Avenue South, consequently increasing the allowable fireflow capacity to the proposed improvements . If either of these alternatives is considered, an additional fireflow analysis should be performed to determine the additional capacity available. 1410 Market Street,P.O. Box 1180,Kirkland,Washington 98033(206)827.6400 Mr. Ron Olsen October 24, 1986 Page 2 The fireflow capability for the analysis was based on the Insurance Service Office' s (ISO) criteria, which is used by the Washington Survey and Rating wreau, the local rating company, in accordance, with ISO criteria, the Water System was simulated experiencing a maximum day demand with the single largest source of supply, WPII R, out of service (e.g., due to failure, maintenance, etc.) . A summary of the operational conditions used in the analysis follows: o Minimum service pressure of 30 psi in service area during normal demands and 20 psi during fire demands o Wells 1, 2, and 3 are in operation while Well 8 is out of service o Springbrook Springs is supplying the Water System at 1,300 GPM o The Talbot H, 11 Pump Station is in operation at 1 ,500 GPM o The Mt. Olivet Pump Station is operating at 1,70G GPM o The Windsor Hills Pllmp Station is oprratirg at 1,950 GPM o The W, st Hill Pump Station is onerating at 1,200 GPM o The Talbot Hill Reservoir is in operation. f figure summarizing the fireflow analysis is attached for your reference. Copies of the computer analysis have been retained in this office for future reference. If you hve any questions or commen`s regarding this analysis, please do not hesitate to contact z. Sincerely, RH2 ENGINEERING, P.S. Randy L. Asplund, P.E. cc: Mr. Vince Lee, Airport Director Enclosure l OF RFC 7 ! PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT RICHARD C HOUGHTON • DIRECTOR O > MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. 10. RENTON,WASH. 98055 P.oO e' 206 235.2569 P Q4rE0 SEP�EV'04. BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH September 23, 1986 MAYOR MEMORANDUM TO: Ron Olsen FROM: Oick Houghton SUBJECT: Fireflow Analysis - Fancher Flyways Renton, Municipal Airport Ron: The subject fireflow analysis was discussed at the last Aviation Committee Meeting. I want you to arrange for RH2 to perform said analysis for Fancher Flyways' Hangar Proposal (see attached layout) and in conjunction with new water main project. Also attached is earlier information from 3rd Floor for Firefln- Note: The 45' x 95' hangar should be studied on the basis of: a) Aircraft storage only and, b) Aircraft storage plus Repair d Mtc. It is important that the two categories be identifiable separately in terms of the increase in FF requirements for (b). VL:pmp f 4 A AR 'OCH -CW 7 OICI) 41 I-WA: A-M y 1?e cf col-A 50 91 TO: Ron Nelson, Building Official FROM: Richard Boughton, Public Works Director SUBJECT: Proposal by rancher Flyways to Construct New Ilangars on Renton Airport Ron: Attached are (2) copies of:a letter from rancher; a layout of the proposed buildings and a brochure describing the "Fulfab" metal hangars involved. We are hoping to be able to give the Aviation Committee some basic informa- tion to help them deal with this matter on Tuesday, October 29, 8:00 a.m. On a preliminary review basis only can you please arrange for the submittal to us of comments ref. such items as: • need to relocate fire hydrant on west side of property • estimated timing of the complete process - ERC; Condi- tional Use Permit; Building Permit, etc. • any other information which will be of help in discussing the development proposal with rancher Thanks VL:pmp cc: Aviation Committee o pt JL, � )' ••y o 4 �1. ♦ \4 M0. •00 ti L� 2 C� t �-AOW AA T O -Aau..°J'M ;s- f - -7VX9,V Yd D'b'hNyH /y3jV ON/ s/(t/M� ��� r FANCHE-9 FLXWAyS lNc . NOV HANc�AR P,eotOoSA L — <� o f Airpo- -f 41 41 ♦ r � •f p• 1� \ 3 C •s p - / i � w . •9d . ••r� \' + 4 ' , APO s � � ����` �� � � �� , ,�,i�����i�►ililliliil�l ilN�l �� �� .���: , {- _:� :.: ►� ' ,: �.�.•. .,«.,.uurwwwruµprpmxr _ — IMP- ' ' ;. FULFAB AIRCRAFT HANGARS q n.� The'Modern Answer in Aircraft T-Hangars <JY..Yr �, .. .., L17t ULrrA13 �NC, a�Aitq r h :G { � 'lp!+,,T. AVE. S.W. •_ 13OX 1365 +:YCAN ON, t HID PHONE 216 = d77 7211 , � *y•� = f firs •'i "t .�4 C'���, M'+K'. k. 1 ...•- - ^ram�� r ;� '�D1'♦. Y..�»/�•S 1 1 I.y. y,. �� _,�wJv'TI.LF� .i##�� M�� �..i,y� L�. r . f�.,- �-: .a"•4'1:�. tYi;� r.i�t Y'..i��,'t �j�S.yJ1 �,�h � y;.�� " -.tiy4_ •� I .��_.�~.,�7-.i '�.yL-J. ` ,�+ '9�,W�''L I�ri31.iY7� ':.�f'4W� SL � S f � . Select the i»odets meet your need.Jn,siie A,. "door style...Unitline-b rt r.:{�. t� y,;yY. �i,f.4y`Yr ��� .. � riyn+4 `w�1• I s ,1 to you, probably. Is the fact That Fulfab T-Hangars can be ASSEMBLE, panels are lifted into place, attached to the erected by almost any available labor and can be dismantled foundation and bolted to the adjacent connecting members. No special tools are needed. u..d moved if necessary. FULL NESTED PLAN USES SNORTER TAXIWAY Fulfab T-Hangars are pre-ongm oeano lu sure-h ang Where building langth is limited, or where taxiways must be duced for low cost.All-steel componentP kept short,the Fultab FULL NESTED "T" uses space to best You may add more units to lengthen the hangar at any time without difficulty. Complete foundation and erection plans advantage. You can "store more planes per lineal foot: PANIEL:ZE are DESIGNigrteatled y simplifies arior to nd speeds thment of e enclosing of walls teris may be as- sand parttions.embledlInto panels)In ilia flat y all the ipr or t erection. QUICK TO WINTERIZED for "Snow Country" GALVANIZED for Long-Run Savings FULFAB gives you a very generous overhang of the roof Ce^Szed exterior UPKEEP wallls and vital roof are d That's Fultab T- sheets, shedding drippage tar out from the doors, minimiz- Hanged. Our buildings are UNIQUE in that most of the Ing freezeup problems. Mini-slot bottom guides for doors structural members such as purlins, girls, door track, door roJuce friction and contr lbute to trouble-free operation. . frames, center columns, etc, are also made of galvanized it is Important to Chet: up on the way hangar$ have per- steel, t your field, you will appreci- formed an environment comparable your locale. We If you have old T-Hangars e can direct you to nearby fields where Fullltab T-Hangars give ate the superior durability and good looks of galvanized the most satisfactory service In dilficult freezing weather. Fulfab"structurels." E700! _ ..slay'.•_ '; 4 �•. - Nut. now roof drip SLIDING DOORS clear.door guldeel Electric Power-Lift BI-FOLD DOORS are factory assembled Into large panels. Each sliding sec- DELUXE "push button convenience" is 0 have o tour Fed fouling monorail track. The leaves are kept steady and true or lowered by H.F. motor and self•braking worm gear. lion a carried m top roller bearings which ride on non- tab models(two OT's and two LK's)which have doors raise along the bottom by Intermittent guides. COLORS AVAILABLE i FOR WALL & DOOR SHEETING �i I. Shtlmg door leaves come BEIGE WHITE BLUE to site wady to hang RS taiY� ylgg '�lj1 L' � �' �• fr � - ::y rk_et BOTH STANDARD "T" R FULL NESTED "T" are available in any number of units SIANUARU "I" FULL NESTED "T" ! i' { T I OFFICE NO 2 NO 4 B NO, 2 N0. 4 la I I i . D E 4 D C 1 I'CLEAFII 1 N0. 1� J NO 1 !'CLEAR 6 CLEAR WIDTH ' NO 1 NO 3 OFFICE CLEA� AR WIDTH CLEAR CLEAR �. SLfptNG MODEL A a D E HEIGHT gL191fJG MODEL A a C D E HEIGHT DOORS LT-42 IP-B" i6' 32" 20'-8" R DOORS LT-42N 41'-B" 16' 16' 4B' 20'-B" 11'-7' WITH OT-42 d1'•8" i6' 32" 20'-B" I WITH LK-42' 41'-8" iB' 14' S0' 20'•B" 12'-0" Bt-FOLD OT-44 43'-B" 20' 40' Zl'-8" BI•FOLO LK-44' 43'-B" 20' iB' S8' 21'•B" 14'-0"DOORS OT•48 47--a" 20' 40' 23'-B" DOORS LK-4g 4T-B" 20' 18' 58' 23'-8" r4'-0" ," r 'LK42 and LK-N PmvI uety called LK-3 and LK.4 respectively • . EACH ADDL . - - 'MODEL E'IttDMt11,L '� ..� .. _` -- ...��: r{:'t:� ': � y�f •. "'"•1D .12 � 11 UNIT•ADD n sLabfrlOzsbcps. 1jr} � .ytF+ . trr• rkr f alew 1elr,� �Motak t� atww a6tw 31w �i �e�Ty4,tN l l e!R9' .t.. 'f0$` , ''y'!'.'•• rtl � v r r 316' 21 Y 4`• "� ` �tt V'll�,-gar e 4 1""�f Z�NEY�1 •i eY 42 r. r�, f n �'!� : a e • ;rt'�'1 .�Sc .y75s'• 21' •','. I � 22 rt a tbTat i.e, 5 ,,r -Tei"o�� ' w• IYff�` a �'QMMF4 1n 31At •y.. ate r • " . f .� r '1..t ' ryrSr: ! DW` " t ffi1E•{.. 36 j ]ANbARDa'F" 1 t t ��EgtE��" r,. �,�, !1'�MtlarO�'"iiersr»FuU.Nested -r to "TIM 5latraard`, 4" lf}ij! fllaDuoaj,�'DWAIAO ' a�(y(.'r' j W Orateriall and eraclbn 1he final choice a�aw and Mny:rt naaT*310 'W bNIW!Ih bimp" I&AtlOn M the ford area .. +s7.ltralbh arld ptdala'ollnimom tbfNoe or atan90 at"; b' sldratfe aww;laAltMr.wooled.and-Dwatocalf'os ecabnued'hia �D�Na t,EOLD•OOOit m0r,1116 t0in dra IiYIdL p'dipfer honyarrow oWidgm f4T one pnew�tovail Cobs me.moal eeorwmlcal an. •ony*Of of door%4o b:oo tltahout I ad , IT ptovidlnp adagabl msaircraft storage:fins goal of sliding -.Mrrpers 1'Tla ♦UIMMtold "x yllay flta Yllla btW 'n1Yt�1 I� }Iip1eM 11 tOhsidsTaMy-Wslhah ttM Dl-told models.0u;top r Nataulvbegn tip aqw py dl�strr pAalratnp"� tan (r i"kT aft erMlt�tq iolront Hubs four sYslem'has moved Hsen TheFUll-NMie0 joteDr"MIf{tiy'�tfµi+yartllsfb9i10erhdttfM- +' tr'itymydes ime~.*11P,lMrllwtseVMsanew~try.ConalruclPon i�°i'4HpabinplythprinNBpalldaoup(e4arMrtytlbsimatrai It+" atmptaraManlG/iiWNacOToatpiobNana ate eliminated. tadactra tsxlway ooale r: tN!lre.OptlfbrdrQeaeaaay boors an the ansavea%r th #111 a+M�Jarlly of Nrpan aDlhaartAf� it+, ry,tt� !at#7pa+�A?,${tt��'� ' ;catrwfraeflN�4lM tifD lnf.4anw�ctea ' 'fnesueir�yllorntbApjati`t alnl Aletist!lphill ` �leetrtdeityi�o�raoarfb{•IalJxtir3bts are UnQueetlon9hly bi�lM�utllr"N"ytdMMta771tN. eh~MrJoyaflylYftIIIIII l'4, They are recom- •',�+Y t 1au +l triraibgsii e!. ruli is allow rprWtlbd" ka OetlpM wirpyM iMir plrrnN fregdently or con otMr . y r!! A' Sf a subpanlyly V er.aaeo resat ralas I� fie. :n: r <.• S � .i:%"' '! ",r �� �ax�. `i.i e A y, , FULFAB AIRCRAFT Or HANGARS 15^5 WHIPPLE AVE. S.W. a BOX 1365 a CANTON, OHIO 44708 a 216-477.7211 Manufacturer,ese.aes the.,alx to mace changes g,,th-ut notice in price.design motleis and speahcanons - 14a1 REQUIRED FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS 1. HAZARD IOENTIFICAT(ON INFORMATION NAME ff U.b.C. CLASS OF GUILD ADDRESS °S e . c/?r FIRE M(,MT AREA 2. DETERMINE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION. - CLASS (CIRCLE ONE): i - it r - -V fit V FIRE-RESISTIVE NON-COMBUSTIB ORDINARY WOOD FRAME MIXED (NOTE: IF "MIXED", L INSTRUCTION FOR AREA AND BASIC FIRE FLOW) _ 3. DETERMINE AREA: GROUND 1LOOR AREA: �FT2 (A) NUMBER OF STORIES: TOTAL BUILDING AREA: 4. DETERMINE BASIC FIRE FLOW FROM TABLE 01, USING AREA (A): A4 O a GPM co) S. DETERMINE OCCUPANCY FACTOR ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: .2 S> GPM (C) IF LOW HAZARD, SUBTRACT UP TO ?5% OF (B): IF HIGH HAZARD, ADD UP TO 25% OF (B) 6. COMPUTE SUB-TOTAL (B+C): (IF B+C IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 CPM) 1,2 60 _ GPM (D) 7. DETERMINE SPRINKLER ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: `4— GPM (E) (IF COMPLETELY SPRINICLERED, SUBTRACT UP TO 50% OF (D): IF LIGHT HAZARD OCCUPANCY AND FIRE RESISTIVE OR NON-COMBUSTIBLE CONSTRUCTION, SUBTRACT UP TO 75% OF (D). 8. DETERMINE EXPOSURE ADJUSTMENT. USING THE TABLE AT LEFT AS A GUIDE, ENTER THE SEPARATION AND ADJUSTMENT FOR EACH OF THE "FOUR FACES" OF THE BUILDING IN THE TABLE AT THE RIGHT: SEPARATION MAX. ADJUSTMENT EXPOSURE SEPARATION ACT. ADJ. 0 - 10 25% MAX. NORTH f./-, _Y15 ADD .20 % 11 - 30 20% MAX. EAST ADD i_ -% 31 - 60 15% MAX. SOUTH ADD i 61 -100 10% MAX. WEST Z5ADD �8 B 101 -150 5% MAX. TOTALOF ADJUSTMENT 150 OR 4-HR WALL 06 MAX. (NOT TO EXCEED 75%) 56' % (TOTAL % ADJUSTMENT TIMES (D) AD%X.STMENT: GPM (F) 9. DETERMINE ROOF AND SIDING COVERING ADJUSTMENT: (IF SHINGLE COVERING, ADD 500 GPM) ADJUSTMENT: GPM (G) 10. COMPUTE ESTIMATED FIRE FLOW REQUIRED: (IF D+E+F+G IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) (IF D+E+F+C, IS GREATER THAN 12,000 GPM, INSERT 12,4.i0 GPM) (D+E+F+G) REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: p oho o Q GPM (H) 11. SIGNED: 1'•ATE / �/�LrS /S OH 6d �Bn i�TOrINQ , N ♦ �/Iwn �oeJa � :NCP45G jh S�7/Pra pQ ,�qe o� �ocs7.oii / RE UIRtO FIRE FL(Av CALCULATIONS 1. HAZARD IDEN`IFICOTION IHJFOPMSATIO,, `NWZ r U.B.C. CLASS OF BUILD ADDRESS Ll -/ cjy Ln FIRE MGMT AREA 2. DETERMINE TYPE Or CONSTRUCT! - LASS (CIRCLE ONE): 1 - It ' IV FIRE-RESISTIVE NON-COMBUST ORDINARY WOOD FRAME MIXED (NOTE: IF "MIXED", IAL INSTRUCTION FOR AREA AND BASIC FIRE FLOW) 3. DETEPMINE AREA: GROUND FLOOR AREA: fQZ2 6 FT2 (A) NUMBER OF STORIES: TOTAL BUILDING AREA: 4. DETERMINE BASIC FIRE FLOW FROM TABLE III, USING AREA CA): 1Q,50 GPM (B) S. DETERMINE OCCUPANCY FACTOR ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: f 7 / '1. � GPM (C) IF LOW HAZARD, SUBTRACT UP TO 25% OF (B): IF HIGH HAZARD, ADD UP TO 25% OF (B) 6. COMPUTE SUB-TOTAL (B+C): (IF B+C IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) _ / 5Gj �, j GPM (D) 7. DETERMINE SPRINKLER ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: GPM (E) (IF COMPLETELY SPRINKLERED, SUBTRACT UP TO 50% OF (D): IF LIGHT HAZARD OCCUPANCY AND FIRE RESISTIVE OR NON-COMBUSTIBLE CONSTRUCTION, SUBTRACT UP TO 75% OF (D). 8. DETERMINE EXPOSURE ADJUSTMENT: USING THE TABLE AT LEFT AS A GUIDE, ENTER THE SEPARATION AND ADJUSTMENT FOR EACH OF THE "FOUR FACES" OF THE BUILDING IN THE TABLE AT THE RIGHT: SEPARATION MAx. AD�TMENT EXPOSURE SEPARATION ACT. ADJ. 0 - 10 25% MAX. NORTH SO ADD 20 e 11 - 6 15%0 MAX. EAST kDp Tg 31 - 0 158 MAX. SOUTH /T ADD Zo 61 -100 10% MAX. WEST _ / r' ADO Q 101 -150 5% MAX. TOTAL 4 OF ADJUSTMENT 150 OR 4-HR WALL 0% MAX. (NOT TO EXCEED 75%) : (TOTAL 8 ADJUSTMENT TIMES CD) AD x_IS.TMENT: fj9, f� GPM (F) 9. DETERMINE ROOF AND SIDING COVERING ADJUSTMENT: CIF SHINGLE COVERING, ADD 500 GPM) ADJUSTMENT: _ (G) 10. COMPUTE ESTIMATED FIRE FLOW REQUIRED: (IF D+E+F+G IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) / (IF D+E+F+G IS GREATER THAN 12,000 GPM, INSERT 12,C,,o GPM) (D+E+f+G) REQ RED FIRE FLOW: Q GPM (H) 11. SIGNED: f a t'aTE f f I u..,,,.{, . V� REQUIRED FIRC FLOW CALCULATIONS ' 1. HAZARD IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION NAME r a e c�p,— U.B.C. CLASS OF BUILD ✓L3 ADDRESS FIRE MGMT AREA 2. DETERMINE TYPE OF CONSTRU - CLASS (CIRCLE ONE): IV [ FIRE-RESISTIVE COMBU5TI8 ORDINARY WOOD FRAME MIXED (NOTE: IF "MIXED", S L INSTRUCTION FOR AREA AND BASIC FIRE FLOW) 3. DETERMINE AREA: GROUND FLOOR AREA: 2066 FT2 (A) NUMBER OF STORIES: TOTAL BUILDING AREA: '�05(0 4. DETERMINE BASIC FIRE FLOW FROM TABLE 01, USING AREA (A): GPM (8) S. DETERMINE OCCUPANCY FACTOR ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: GPM (C) IF LOW HAZARD, SUBTRACT UP TO 25% OF (B): IF HIGH HAZARD, ADD UP TO 25% OF (B) 6. COMPUTE SUB-TOTAL (B+C): (IF B+C IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) �� .�. � GPM (D) 7. DETERMINE SPRINKLER ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: �� GPM (E) (IF COMPLETELY SPRINKLERED, SUBTRACT UP TO 50% OF (D): IF LIGHT HAZARD OCCUPANCY AND FIRE RESISTIVE OR NON-COMBUSTIBLE CONSTRUCTION, SUBTRACT UP TO 75% OF (D). 8. DETERMINE EXPOSURE ADJUSTMENT: USING THE TABLE AT LEFT AS A GUIDE, ENTER THE SEPARATION AND ADJUSTMENT FOR EACH OF THE "FOUR FACES" OF THE BUILDING IN THE TABLE AT THE RIGHT: SEPARATION MAX. ADJUSTMENT EXPOSURE SEPARATION ACT. AOJ. 0 - 10 25% MAX. NORTH �d f AD. 11 - 30 20$ MAX. EAST ---! A� 31 - 60 15% MAX. SOUTH ADD $ 61 -100 IO$ MAX. WEST ADO $ 101 -150 5% MAX. TOTAL % OF ADJUSTMENT 150 OR 4-HR WALL 0% MAX. (NOT TO EXCEED 75%)) : $ (TC L % ADJUSTMENT TIMES (D) AD,k STMENT: 939, 5 GPM (F) 9. DETERMINE ROOF AND SIDING COVERING ADJUSTMENT: (1F SHINGLE COVERING, ADD 500 GPM) ADJUSTMENT: "19- GPM (G) 10. COMPUTE ESTIMATED FIRE FLOW REQUIRED: (IF D+E+F+G IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) (IF (>+E+F+G IS GREATER THAN 12,000 GPM, INSERT 12,r30 GPM)(D+E+F+G) REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: �DO 0 GPM (H) 11. SIGNED: S i•ATE �- o26- 0 6 OF RR� 4 T PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT RICHARD C HOUGHTON • DIRECTOR MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 ,oO b P 206 235-2569 SEPIEMO� BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH March 21 , 1986 MAYOR MEMORANDUM TO: Bob Bergstrom FROM: Richard Houghton SUBJECT: Water System Comprehensive °la^ and Airport Hangar Development Plans As you know, Fancher Flyways is pursuing their proposed Hangar Development in the southeast corner of the airport. Fire protection requirements are going to be a major concern based on the very preliminary review accomplished by Fire Prevel.tion. Since this property is already served by an older water main it will be nece- ssary to wait until the selected final configuration of the development is confirmed, together with the determination of fireflow capacity needed, before we can decide what we need to do ref. the basic water system. Immediately following the Conditional Use Permit Hearing on it was suggested to Fancher that the first thing to do would be to obtain a fireflow analysis, because of the �. elir.linary indication re hydrants, etc. Since then we understand that a' a-naiiie hangar site layouts have been sub- mitted to the Fire Department for fireflow review. Fancher has also been negotiating with the Fire Department for their acceptance of the existing Boeing hydrants. A computer analysis of available fireflow has not yet been obtained as far as we know. Obviously the intent of the multi-year water utility plan is to accomplish a gradual upgrading of the City water system on the fiele w;.ich reduces dependency on Boeing's private system, improves the capacity and reliability of the City system and thereby improves fire protection and supports development. Bear in mind that the Airport is handleri in a different way compared to the usual development of property in the City. We have identified Utilitv Improvements on the field as a long rar,ge program toward which airport reve- nues will be allocated each year, su�ject to Council approval of budget requests. Bob Bergstrom March 21 , 1986 page Two If Fancher's contractor has been given information based on the more usual developer responsibilities then a further explanation may be necessary in respect to the Airport plan ref. the intent to provide an eventual basic level of service at approximately 3500 gpm. Any up-sizing of our proposed mains plus any on-site looping or additional hydrants will still , of course, be the developer's responsibility. Obviously the choice of prioritization for the currently budgeted West Peri- meter Road extension of water main (with sewer) was tied to the previous requirement that hangar development would occur on the Apron "B" area just south of the municipal hangar. Also, it provides for upgraded service to Jobmaster if required and for new service to the M;h+ripal Hangar (both water and sewer). The next Thases of the planned water main, i .e. continuing southerly along West Perimeter Road and easterly along S. Perimeter Road were originally programmed in the 1987-1988-1989 time period because there was no evident close-in developmental need. We need to prepare for the eventuality that these future phases may have to be advanced so that the Fancher development will ;lave the basic upgraded system earlier if the fireflow requirements make it necessary. Please pre- pare a preliminary cost estimate for the extended water main on W. and S. Perimeter Roads and coordinate your system requircments with the sewer design on W. Perimeter Road. We will keep you informed about future input from Fancher and the Fire Depart- ment. itl Lc�' f/ :pmp TRANSPORTATION (AVIATION) COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT: West Perimeter Road WATER MAIN AND SANITARY SEVER IWROVFI4ENTS AND SOUTH PERIMETER ROAD WATER MAIN AND ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS The Transpi,rtation (Aviation) Committee concurs in the recommendation of the Public Works Department to accept the low bid of Scoccolo Construction Inc. in the amount of $423,134,76. The Committee also recommends that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute the contract documents. Thomas Trimm, Chairman Robert Hughes, Vice-Chairman Kathy Keo ker Pw OF R`c PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT RICHARD C. HOUGHTON • DIRECTOR c` $ MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 oA9 rE0 SEPTE���P 206 235-2569 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH October 14, 1986 MAYOR Thomas Trimm, Chairman Members of the Transportation (Aviation)Commi �cee SUBJECT: Combined Bid: W. Perimeter Rd. Water Main and Sanitary Sewer S. Perimeter Rd. Water Main and Roadway Improvement Dear Committee Members: The bid opening for the subject projects was held on October 8, 1986. A tabulation of the bids received is attached hereto. This is a combined project bid involving (4) separate elements, i .e. West Perimeter Rd. 'Water Main Extension; West Perimeter Road Sanitary Sewer Extension; South Perimeter Road Water Main Extension; South Perimeter Road Roadway Improvement. Utilities Fund is prov,ding $16,500 (ref. Sewer Lift Station). Combined 1986 Airport Fund appropria- tions are $166,500. Balance of funding will be provided by 1987 Airport Fund appropriation of $240,635. It is recommended that the low bid, submitted by Scoccolo Construction, Inc. in the amount of $423,134.76 be accepted and the contract for the subject project be awarded to said contractor. Very truly yours, Richard C. Houghton Public Works Director .1RT:mf Attachments OF I? U MR PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT o RICHARD C. HOUGHTON • DIRECTOR O MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVe. SO. RENrON, WASH. 98055 9, o' 206 235-2569 A A,fFO SEPIEMeb BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR October 14, 1986 Thomas Trimn, Chairman Members of the Transportation (Avidtion)C0l1'Jnittee SUBJECT: Combined Bid: W. Perimeter Rd. Water Main and Sanitary Sewer S. Perimeter Rd- Water Main and Roadway Improvement Dear Committee Members: The bid opening for the subject projects was held on October 8, 1986. A tabulation of the bids received is attached hereto. This is a combined project bid involving (4) separate elements, i .e. West Perimeter Rd. Water Main Extension; West Perimeter Road Sanitary Sewer Extension; South Perimeter Road Water Main Extension; South Perimeter Road Roadway Improvement. Utilities Fund is providing $16,500 (ref. Sewer Lift Station). Combined 1986 Airport Fund appropria- tions are $166,500. Balance of funding will be provided by i987 Airport Fund appropriation of $240,635, It is recommended that the ltw bid, submitted by Scoccolo Construction, Inc. in the amount of $423,114.76 be accepted and the contract for the subject project be awarded to said contractor. Very truly yours, Richard C. Houghton Public Works Director ORT:mf Attaehme its .y TRANSPORTATION (AVIATION) COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT: West Perimeter Road WATER MA!N AND SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS AND SOU111 PERIMETER ROAD WATER MAIN AND ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS The Transportation (Aviation) Committee concurs in the recommendation of the Public Works Department to accept the low bid of Scoccolo Construction Inc. in the amount of $423,134,76. The Committee also recommends that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute the contract documents. Thomas Trim, Chairman Robert Hughes, Vice-Chairman Kathy Keolker Pw ` UG"tv�f�. 13 , 19$lD I�CE:NTON e:�Y CpI...U'C.r/ /117NlcTES City c# Rentcr Cneck G3stributicn Fu�tl TtteI Cr ecxs he, the urderfiQneo rambers Of Lne ways me Merits Committee Of tre Renton City Cowrcilr hrvint raceivet deprrtrental Certlf3Cetion that merchencise Endler services h#.va been received or rendered• to hereby operove for payment Vouchers No. 17669 thrown Ne. 18u52 rrc sire trrnsfers in the total #mount of 1,224,944.96 this 13tr dey of October 1986. As rutrcr3zed by R01016130n No. 2614o eerly disbursements in the rmouni of 236,393.00 r es ear the rtifemoor rre inclucec in tie total of rll cisburssments. Committee C rirran V(IJ , h Member L` 4 M*M b BID TABULATION SHEET PRO JECT • Renton Airport Paying 6 Utilities - West 6 South DATEOctober B, 1986 Perimeter Roads BIDDER EEO MBE AA 8B Addendum Ack. R. L. ALIA CO. X $522.999.47 X 9215 M. L. King Way S. Seattle, WA 96118 COLUCCIO CONSTRUCTION CO. X $497,697.37 X %00 M. L. King Way S. Seattle, WA 98118 DYAD CONSTRUCTION, INC. X $592,724.19 X P.O. Box Ilse Woodinville, WA 98072 KAC. CONSTRUCTION, INC. X $035,765.42 X 7121 B Sexton Road Snohom�-h, WA 98290 KOHL EXCAVATING, INC X $467,44t.00 Addendum not acknowledged 3330 East Valley Road Renton, WA 99055 MERLINO CONSTRUCT ION CO. X $529.001.40 9125 loth Avenue South Seattle, WA 98108 BID TABULATION SHEET PRO JECT • Page Two DAT E • October 8, 1986 BIDDEREEO MBE AA BB BI D Addendum Acknow. PAPE 6 SONS CONST., INC. X $488, 341.74 X 2809 Cabrini Ave. NW Cig Harbor, WA 98335 SCOCCOLO CONSTRUCTION, INC. X $423, 124.76 X 2825 S. 154th St. Seattle, WA 98188 R. W. SCOTT CONST. CO. X $S83,869.18 X 9840 Carr Road Renton, W0. 98055 UNIVERSALILAND CONST. CO. X $609,966.09 X P.O. Box 329 Woodinville, WA 98072 VALLEY CEMENT CONST., INC. X $690, 123.32 X P.O. Box 838 Auburn, WA 98071 ENCINQER'S ESTIMATE: $452,576.33 RH2 ENGINEERING, i MEME ` QF UMMO MOUCTAL 1410 Market Street P. O. Box 1180 KIRKLAND. WASHINGTON 98033 o.a io. Ro 10-9-86 .TT..'ION -- --- Rf TO Ron Olsen Fancher Flyways Fireflow Analysis pity of Renton WE ARE SENDING YOU 1Vc Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: ❑ Shop drawings f_; Pricts ❑ plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Copy . ' letter Change order ❑ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 2-23-86 ran s..Fireflow _Requirements THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below. ❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted "_ Resubmit--copies for approval L] For your use ❑ Approved as noted Submit .copies for distribution ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections Cl Return.—corrected prints ❑ For review and comment ❑ _ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 _? PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS_ Ron: I will have this analysis completed by Tuesday 10-14-86, if you need it sooner please let me know. Randy COPY TO SIGNED: Mattvlat 'Wram ia.tw.r•., 11.nC1.Wru b. ..1 .0 not.d. lundly nOt.t, u.at.nt.. '- OF R� PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT RICHARD C HOUGHTON • DIRECTOR 0 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.99055 �A"rEo 206 235-2569 SEPISOO�P BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH October 2, 1986 MAYOR Mr. Dave Stroup Manager, Planning and Leased Property BOEING COMMERCIAL AIRPLANE COMPANY P. 0. Box 3707 M/S 75-66 Seattle, WA 98124 SUBJECT: Boeing Authorization for Temporary "Emergency" Usage of Fire Protection System on Airport by Renton Fire Depart- ment. Dear Dave: As you know we are attempting to clear the way for hangar dev:lopment projects on the field. Since the City's new water main will not be available on the West side until after hangar construction ste.rts, our Fire Marshall has agreed to a temporary coverage via the Boeing system if Boeing agrees. We need your confirmation that should an emergency occur during the hangar construction process (and prior to our new main being in service) then the Renton Fire Department is authorized to use the Boeing Fire Protection System. Hydrant Coupling Adaptors will be provided on site as required. Attached is a letter confirming that the Boeing (Renton) Fire Department approves the proposed authorization. PROPOSED INDEMNIFICATION 8 HOLD HARMLESS PROVISION FOR AGREEMENT WITH RENTON FIRE DEPARTMENT The City of Renton agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the Boeing Company, its officers, directors, employees, agents and assignees, from and against all claims and liabilities, including costs, attorneys' fees and expenses incident thereto, for injury to or death of any person or persons, including employees of the City, or for lots of or damage to any property, including any aircraft, arising out of or in any way connected with the City's use of Boeing's fire protection system at Renton Airport � 1 Mr. Dave Stroup October 2, 1986 Page 2 whether or not arising in tort cr occasioned in whole or in part by the negligence of Boeing. Very truly yours, �c`Ich i-CI Hoag t /J Richard C. Houghton Public Works Director City of Renton VL:pmp Attachment The Boeing Company hereby authorizes this temporary emergency usage of its Air t Fire Protpction System. J. JWI son — irector of Facilities 6 Services BCAC yy't nF Rc• PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT RICHARD C. HOUGHTON 0 DIRECTOR aMUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH.911055 9 0' 206 235-2569 �0�9rED SEs'�E���P BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH September 16, 1986 MAYOR Chief Jerry Johnston Boeing (Renton) Fire Dept. P. 0. Box 3707 M/S 99-05 Org. 4-1720 Seattle, MA 98124-2207 SUBJECT: Proposed Authorization Allowing Renton City Fire Department Use of Boeing Fire Protection System on Renton Airport Dear Chief Johnston: There are presently (2) planned development projects at the Renton Airport for the construction of Aircraft Hangars. To support this development the City is proceeding with a plan to install a new water main on the west side of the field. However , the hangar projects will be ready for construction before the City's water main is available for use. Renton's Fire Marshal , Glen Gordon, has agreed to allow the hangar projects to proceed provided that a Letter of Authorization can be obtained from the Boeing Company allowing the City Fire Department to use Boeing's water system on the airport should the need arise, pending completion of our own water main. Mr. David Stroup, Manager, Planning and Leaseo Property - BCAC, has offered to help us obtain such a letter, but he will need assurance from you that such a proposal is acceptable. It is understood, of course, that any authorization document would include a waiver of liability by which the City would hold Boeing harmless. The proposed hangar s —es are shown on the attached vicinity map. If the "interim use" proposal is acceptable to the Boeing Fire Department, please sign in the space designated below and return this letter to the undersigned. Mr. Stroup will then be provided with a formal request for a Letter of Authorization, together with this letter. l Chi:,f Johnston September 16, 1986 Page Two Please contact this office if you require additional information. Very truly yours, Ri hard C. Houghton Public Works Director VL:pmp Attachment cc: D. Stroup W. Bonnatt G. Gordon APPROVED - PROPOSED INTERIM AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF BOEING FIRE PREVENTION SYSTEM BY RENTON FIRE DEPARTMENT- Signed: J. JohnsLcn / Chief Big (Renton) Fire Department a� • ?� T. L' 3N. R.SE z LA+✓E Lj va_ 0 1 Wvt•�� ' • O gYM'11M MY xx aYRo{l »•CA •v`•—M_ _� .- `� AYOPW[ a...D•T r•rv�. - .r lD•a CLOSED ••4 IEEM MW NOS• 54'S6"W (TRUE . Dlf/ltCm; —_� re.s_.---.+,• � j. . .f ,„ ..'\ -fit �� • ! ->. � g �, a� ,. .na for EI Lvova.ca y� _ �y�<aaartA �Z . —/ . .. - - - ncuvaY SITE o wD SEEMS .s•D "0 ---.w:rc•eaa• hnms•aa»•�•gT�' a I. MM lO Tw aPA •1a.1_�� sa:, __r,� —SEES 111 HwvlCl .uTlWYw war .� � ��T' ,eu r '' �)I '� •v O�YfURr n„as � . +�,Y Y7�Yf Rt 1 SEEM ITS , •MT� •' �I � \� R.at �PE�ra� 1 �' Na ,', Mc/Nicio/!L E N D .1. 1 p..a,uuf AW }6YIN�' S _ J ELAN REVIEW ROUTING SLIP SLR r LiA DATE: 7- /4/ APPLICANT: L N K) JOB ADDRESS: NATURE OF WON(: YF LJ TO: Comments Due Comments Due I`I ENGINEERING DIVISION I X I FIRE PREVtNTION BUREAU TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION I4I BUILDING CODE REVIEW I�I UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION 7" R (_I ZONING 3 PARKING I_I OTHERS I~I ENERGY CODE Comments or suggestions regarding this application should be provided in writing. Plesse provide comments to the Building Division by . :Do p.m, on above date. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION I I APPROVED I_) APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ! I/ I NOT APPROVED 111111 Fin SUL 'treat addrets OAR N �u11J M P �� /yla,„ a.l �:�c /�✓� �+,�5 bei►dia1. xp Partabla lire ertielliskm V[;/.Ie )Z:/0, Vreo'rnd t►re tinaa60-�,ev © V�.' t� HST m � ���gi3 A� ti�rual,hy�1d�Yftt �� s2.di[aicca.•+ - 'V fare fares/fire Ieee$ $ball be oattN { �j Fire alum syst(s eoT slats to be saboomw for wreral BATE_J Signature of Director or Authorized Representa V REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION U/'Io-� — !_I APPROVED � APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS I�I NOT APPROVED KIFSture of 0 rector or Authorized Representative - f City of Renton ; Call for Bids _ Renton Municipal Arpon Paving and Utilities West and South Pa�uneter Roads Sealed twos volt be ,ece,ved until 2 30 AFFII AVIT OF PUBLICATION r,Wad office`a�'wll be Opened City publicly read ,n the 4th ltoor conference room, Renton Mumc,pa,Buddrµ7,200 Mal duarrey DeJoie _ beingfirst dui sworn on oath states that Ave south, Y The work to be performed within ea hefshe is the Chief Clerk o the working days from the date o1 commeme- menl under this Contract shall include,but not be!im,te7 10: VALLEY NEWSPAPERS Fal toot and nary approximately et32 her lineal fe9t of Sanitary 5nwar mein,together wan all regwred appurtenances, 10"0141 Daily News Journal, Daily Record Chronicle, Daily Globe News with the.OMOVal 01 two sewer fill stations and the installation of one sewer tra station. Dail newspapers published six (6) times a week.That said newspapers Furn,sh and install 2733 lineal feel of . y p ductile von water mein, together with all are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six required appurtenances, and apwoxr months pr he date of publication refer-ed to,printed and published money 44o tons of asphalt concrete ove+lay, and comptels 1estw0110n as set in the Erg, nguage continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King forth in the dowgr... ngs and speatica- County, W...wngton. Valley Newspapers have been approved a The leg&A bons e City,eserves e,e rigl. o reject any newspapers by order of the Superior court of the State of Washington for and or ail bids and b waive. v endw all King County. intwmallues. Approved plans and specifications arW Iwm of contract documents MsY be ob- Thr notice in the exact form attached,was published in the Daily News famed at the at the Renton public twor s Departuilding ant officeor a Journal_, Daily Record Chronicle X , Daily Globe News—, (and nomrelundatwe fee of $25 J0 each set, not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its plus A c5 co to cverpostheck or gebid if mailed me subscribers during the below stated period. The. annexed notice a amount of live percent (5%) of the total Call For bids _ waspublished amount of each bid must accompany each Old on September 2lr and October 1. 196b H1643 Trw Ciya Fee Practices and NM- -'riecnrrynWion POitne shell r,City pply Maxlrw E Motor,City Clerk r bush d In the Deny Record Chronicle The full.amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the e,.t 24 and Oct t. 1W Rt443 sum of s55.45 E P Subscribed and sworn to before me this tat day of Oct Ig 66 otary Public for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, King County, Washington. W N)Reeled 1000 w-g.5B AelN-A MT � fOzf�r/5.546, gb.b��e w- es( faf�poo�Ys'.54`. sR.toS (i5� ACC.CUN f I'f' VALLEY , NEWSPAPERS ® P.O. sox 130 KENiv tiASHikGTGGTGN 98 58032-013u PHENE (206)872-6600 GI7V CL LE—LE— I LAZE iU1 1C/ 1G/cb •.1 �.�IVi�K/CITY fN �— VEPT r'u4LiC WT kKS — — —CC— S �5/@E J 200 l,iLL .oYE 5 — DETACH 3 RETURN THIS PORTION WITH PAYMENT \ Timcs DATE DESCRIPTION 7(-)L;;, LINES AMOUNT L[Gt k1V. uHAFGE4 9/15/434E R11:31 w-4+i 9/24.186 0,1643 "APO-T l 5.LC i l � i Iy I V C:1„tTc . . :N GF if 5 CITY OF Ri=.S TIFIC ION j ThE UhaE^AANTp GA reCn'4Y CC'iT UhD[" Y O. T IfJL Y T VATE' l8 H.T.. ! I fl [� Sr- i A gJEflC DA THt i + ki It 'A.IW, AND THa• a _I TG u ;) IID j T C(tY 'Tv Ku T : I µ '•'� EO 1yy!! AUThtr• niL w'40 ClAflfY T4 w-S5! wu` .�• —4.7y�i All/U Cl/r$� SYfo 3S 4A �r'f� ` 'fit}' lj�. -j -SS6 Iwo It A S }az/ YS. 46•-16. 6 ,, 3W 4 ;, 4S VALLEY NLNSPAPERS 11. 15 130 2 P.i.. ;::.X 130 — K:ATr 6A. SBO22-0357 .liq .UU .UO PAST DUE FROM PREVIOUSMONTHS �SALAI� E1 UO n AV THIS AMOUNT 130. 32 PLEASE Sff0W ACCOUNT NUMBER ON CHECK OF 1?t z PUBLIC: WORKS DEPARTMENT a RICHARD C HOUGHTON • DIRECTOR p � MUNICIPAL 'iUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 v 206 235-2564 vDA,rEI, SEP10111P BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH September 23, 1986 MAYOR MEMORANDUM TO: Ron Olsen rROM: Dick Houghton SUBJECT: Fireflow Analysis - Fancher Flyways Renton Municipal Airport Ron: The subject fireflow analysis was discussed at the last Aviation Committee Meeting. I want you to arrange for RH2 to perform said analysis Tor Fancher Flyways' Hangar Proposal (see attached layout) and in conjunction with new water main project. Also attached is earlier information from 3rd Floor for Fireflows. Note: The 45' x 95' hanger should be studied on the basis of: a) Aircraft storage only and, b) Aircraft storage plus Repair & Mtc. It is important that the two categories be identifiable separately in terms of the increase in FF requirements for (b). VL:pmp h i W/ 1 -�j Tom" tax l— G3'A.Sf=/� t.�-� / > y , •�1.eJ:, i� �. . J �'/IJt/- 'CiCH <<4✓ �. Cjft'' �Cy `S,{��U! ra U.fE Cilsa.!fGc �Cr/C'Q{ QS �E/'Q/rc llti,�r, �A11/i�E. A!l/9iZhv✓nc f'FcC "i ia � M4 y /fir TO: Ron Nelson, Building Official FROM: Richard Houghton. Public Works Director SUBJECT: Proposal by rancher Flyways to Construct New Hangars on Renton Airport Ron: Attached are (2) copies of:a letter from rancher; a layout of the proposed buildings and a brochure describing the "Fulfab" metal hangars involved. We are hoping to be able to give the Aviation Committee some basic informa- tion to help them deal with this matter on Tuesdaj, October 29, 8:00 a.m. On a preliminary review basis only can you please arrange for the submittal to us of comments ref. such items as: • need to relocate fire hydrant on west side of property • estimated Liming of the com;ilete process -- ERC; Condi- tional Use Permit; Building Permit, etc. . any other information which will be of help in discussing the development proposal with rancher ]hanks - VL:pmp cc: Aviation Committee FANcNE-e F+t.)/WAyS INC . °ts NEW HAiVgAg P,eo?OSA L — 43 of Ai r�oYf PN�sE Z c d6• - a r' 4 � a 1 Y xr l a L p< / r - - 'yyy- . _a _ A J 1 T 1 1 °' 'r'^.vx^Mun111M1111111111111NIM111111� — �.- t � x " 060 *FUL1, AIRCRAFT HANGARS x` Aodern An fret In Aircraft T-Hangars •M '{t • , - R3�� ntiG �yl„ M�. v< ,IsAt kt�w� .h a4,y- u ° .^ k n pt��� flol�LEA , INC 11 A .W.`&'BOX 136 • CA ) bN � r 1 r a c .II �3F k1 1`r �" The Widest • e Makes FUL FA • 1 ' or ara%ge Of s�jzes to provide shelter f vate plan a. Models and dimensions of Fulfal? ular Pit 0 ompare in the Charts on the baCK AIRCRAFT t r HANGARS �OHPangars are easy to c Fultalp pa Kr design and fabrication methods have made T-Hangars the stanuard of the industry. Equally important First Choice N ry•. +Q� • a �.^• s• AL y. 46 !yy� XT i Select t e m6del hal + y meet your need...jn;stze.irb ..� . ` door style...init dine= i M. Volk /w,, y fC try ` ��, war ,,� ,j. ♦e '" 4 to you, probably, is the fact that Fulfab T-Hangars :an be ASSEMBLE, panels are lifted Into place, attached w 66P erected by almost any available labor and can be dismantled foundation and bolted to the adjacent connecting members. and moved if necessary. No special tools are needed. Fulfab T-Hangars are pre-engineered and quantity pro- FULL NESTED PLAN USES SHORTER TAXIWAY duced for low cost.All-steel component parts are sure-fitting. Where building length is limited,or where taxiways must be You may add more units to lengthen the hangar at any time kept short,the Fulfab FULL NESTED"T"uses space to best without difficulty. Complete foundation and erection plans advantage. You can "store more planes per lineal loot." are furnished prior to shipm-nit of material. PANELIZED DESIGN greatly simplifies and speeds the enclosing of walls and partitions. Nearly all the sidewall mater!sls may be as- sembled into peals In the flat prior to erection. QUICK TO WINTERIZED for "Snow Country" GALVANIZED for Long-Run Savings FULFAB gives you a very generous overhang of the roof COST OF UPKEEP is a vital consideratioln. That's why gal- sheets, shedding drippege ter out from the doors, minimiz- vanized exterior walls and roof are standard on Fulfab T- ing freezeup problems. Mini-slot bottom guides for doors Hangars. Our buildings are UNIQUE in that most of the reduce friction and contribute to trouble-tree operation. structural members such as purlins, gins, door track, door It Is important to check up on the way hangars have per- frames, center columns, etc. are also made of galvanized steel. formed in an environment comparable to your locale. We It you have old T-Hangars at your field, you will appreci- can direct you to nearby fields where Fulfab T-Hangam give ate the superior durability and good looks of galvanized the most satisfactory service in difficult freezing weather. Fulfab "structurals." Note how root SLIDING DOC RS esm door gull Electric Power-Litt BI-FOLD DOORS are factory assembled Into large panels. Each sliding sec- DELUXE "push button convenience" is offered on four Ful- tion Is carries on is p roper bearings which ride on non- tab models(two OT's and two LK's)which have doors raised fouling monorail trac%.The leaves are kept steady and true or lowered by 34 H.P. motor and self braking worm gear. along the bottom by rrtermittent guides. COLORS AVAILABLE �T FOR WALL & DOOR SHEETING ri I, I II n. Sliding door leaves romp BEIGE WHITE BLUE to site ready 10 rang BOTH STANDARD "T" 8 FULL NESTED "T" are available in any number of units STANDARD 'IT" J FULL NESTED "T" NO 2 NO 4 OFFICE NO 2 NO 4 9 i e D E 1 D C 1 "NEAP { l NO 1 NO 3 I I1'O E ~--A� 1 ' NO. 1 NOA3 OFFICE CLEAR WIDTH A CLEAR WIDTH CLEAR CLEAR 1 SLIDING MODEL A B D E HEIGHT MODEL A B C D E HEIGHT SLIDING DOORS LT-42 41'-B" 16' 32 20-8` l l'-7" DOOR$ LT-42N 41 -8" 16' 16' 48' WITH OT-42 41'-8" 76' 32' 20'-B" 12'-0" WITH LK-42' 41'-8" 18 14' 50' 20'-B" BI-FOLD OT-44 43'-B" 20' 40' 21'-V 14-0" RI-FOLD LK-44 43-8' 20' 18' 58' 2r-8" 14'-C' DOORS OT-48 4T-B" 20' 4C' 23'-8" td'-0' DOORS LK-48 47'-8" 20' 18' 58 23"-8 14'-0" 'LK-42 and LK-44 previduely tilled LK.3 and LK-4 respectively. f1At40AR - 'NUMBER OF UNITE EACH ADD'L MODEL ENDWALL t71M. `@ g 6 8 '10 12 14 UNIT-ADD SLIDING DOORSZh, - LT42N 44B!•... T63' I 105 .;� 126 9g41 I 2t68'24�' ( . 1'' I - 3273' I 15' , 32%' Ell-FOLD DOORS i. 1 LK42 f "{j0' $3 104 /Lo -I 147' 169 231, 27,T 315' 21' l.Kd4 - rg,38' ,a6 , 13, I - 54' 198 242' 286' 330' 22' LK48 - 58' '72 1 118' {{ 216 2"' 312, 3W, 24' OT42 .3? 73g' I �$qyl`,l 262E 325N' IlMi 451 W 310' 43T44 ,;;,a0, 77 2M 1 7M :841* 407' .. 47T 33' . . 0T4B - 40' . 84 ' ,�. 228' 300 �72, 444 gtR _J.. 36 t STANDARD '6T"1If FJJLL•WESTED'T. S e the Mail of a Standard T 'eereLafull-Nested 'IT" is The Standard'T"configuration produces a building ih2t is ear_ essf dWly the same for material SMi erection, the final effoice ,* row and long.It baslhe advatltage of being the simplest alonfig- depends on the best utilization c4 the lard area. uralion and using.the minimum office or storage spafe. This storage space is often wasted and therefore it to economical to SLIDING DOOR re T f FOLD C ioR minimize it In the elidiryt door hangars ma seridard'T-allows 'Slidteg door hangars have proved to tie the most ec nomical an. sny ',et of 00"10 be opened without compromising adjacent 4w&r,lOr WOylding adequate aNcrall storage.The cost at sliding hangars. This Standard "T"also file well Into.plots chat have :ODor models is considerablyless than the bl told models.Out lop •',.previously been am aside by master planning.,, I . _.. �76lim Interenatenl bottom guide door Lfstem has proved dsmf The Full-Netted nT"Constltues a hangar that is wider t ti Lor- many limes even In the most severe arrow country.Construction "spondingly shorler.mee, it occupies net fly the same area It Is simplef and mechanical uvi electrical moblems are eliminated. .� ,rtaduces taxiway Costs wbftanlYlly.The Olfipa.Or{tWage areas ,Sliding floors are the anawar for that la•ge majority of airports ;.era sornawhal W,gar whktt is an advanNge ittl,ey era need. `hat Cannot demand the mg City rental rates. 'The sliding'door hanpatt Itist fie full tested ale deliVnated by The eieclricelly'operabd Ao-fold doors me unquestionably 1'. the suffix"N"as in'the LT42N.This mo,"entoys the advantages ' desarable.A button 1s easier to push then&door They are recent. hslad 6bove for full neata i hangars out is elightfy eornpromiied 'mended for people who use their planes frequently or can other. :Dy lM fact that esch set Grit= has lOSLde m fmfltt criiyO,.e'Mhind 'wise luatih the substant4ny mctsesed rental rates, ,liralglMoring doetlt jigf `,,4V �rA iT ' t. t�. '7r1 ' •1, FULFAB AIRCRAFT Ir HANGARS 1525 WHIPPLE AVE. S.W. a BOX 1365 a CANTON, OHIO 44708 a 216-477.7211 Manutactu? reserves ins ngn(tp max&cnanyes without nonce,n,n a des,y n models ands eOhtdhons n to-el 4 r W 858 Airport-West Perimeter Rd. Watermain RLUUIRED FIR[ FLOW CALCUI.ATION'i 1. HAZARD IDENTIFICATjON INFORMATION U.B.C. CLASS of BUILD h'• MO.3 ADDRESS _ �°�S 7c r FIRE MGMT AREA 2. DETERMINE TYPE OF CONSTRUCT] _- CLASS (CIRCLE ONE): / IV III V I - II __.�_._ ` FIRE-RESISTIVE NON-COMBUSTIB ORDINARY WOOD FRAME MIXED (NOTE: IF "MIXED", L INSTRUCTION FOR AREA AND BASIC FIRE FLOW) 3. DETERMINE AREA: GROUND FLOOR AREA: f V ' FT2 (A) NUMBER OF STORIES: TOTAL BUILDING AREA: C. 4. DETERMINE BASIC FIRE FLOW FROM TABLE 01, USING AREA (A): /JO 0 GPM (e) 5. DETERMINE OCCUPANCY FlCTOR ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: -/ �2'SO GPM (C) IF LOW HAZARD, SUBTRACT UP TO 25% OF (B): IF HIGH HAZARD, ADD UP TO 25% OF (B) 6. COMPUTE SUB-TOTAL (B+C): (IF B+C Is LOSS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) GPM (D) 7. DETERMINE SPRINKLER ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: 'vn-- GPM (E) (IF CLWIPLCTELY SPRINKLERED, SUBTRACT UP TO 50% OF (D): 1F LIGHT HAZARD OCC00AINCY AND FIRE RESISTIVE OR NON-COMBUSTIBLE CONSTRUCTION, SUBTRACT U" TO 75% OF (D). 8. DETERMINE EXPOSURE ADJUSTMENT: USING THE TABLE AT LEFT AS A r>UIDE, ENTER O E SEPARATION AND ADJUSTMENT FOR EACH OF THE "FOUR FACES" OF THE BUILDING IN THE TABLE AT THE RIGHT: SEPARATION MAX. ADJUSTMENT EXPOSURE SEPARATION ACT. ADJ. 0 - 10 25% MAX. NORT}; PL, ?�i ADD �O 4 11 - 30 206 MAX. EAST ii ' ADD � S- 31 •- 60 15$ MAX. SOUTH 14 ADD i 61 -100 10% MAX. WEST AI D 101 -150 5% MAX. TOTAL 3 OF ADJUSTMENT 150 OR 4-HR WALL 0% MAX. (NOT TO EXCEED 75%) : _ 5 6- (TOTAL % ADJUSTMENT TIMES (D) ADYjZ: MENT: ,��7, GPM (F) 9. DETERMINE ROOF AND SIDING COVERING ADJUSTMENT: (IF SHINGLE COVERING, ADD 500 GPM) ADJUSTMENT: '$-- GPM (G) 10. COMPUTE ESTIMATED FIRE FLOW REQUIRED: (IF D+E+F+G Is LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) (IF D+E+F+G IS GREATER THAN 12,000 GPM, INSERT 12,C-.;; GPM) (D+E+F+G) REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: p Q Q GPM (H) 11. SIGNED: a • ;%ATE �nt$ � 5 eH/✓ 6a �Bn in�prma�G n a �/fwnd• / ,s CZJA coo W;/ J Fc05Itac M aco/h j � ICAIi RLOUIRfD FIRE FLOW CALC.R6&UZj I. HAZARD IOE IFICATI N INFORMATION N U.B.C. CLASS OF BUILD ADDRESS i FIRE MGMT AREA 2. DETERMINE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTI - LASS (CIRCLE ONE): I - II %r`V V SIRE-RESISTIVE NON-COMBUST ORDINARY WOOD FRAME MIXED (NOTE: I "MIXED", IAL INSTRUCTION FOR AREA AND BASIC FIRE FLOW) 3. DETERMINE AREA: GROUND FLOOR AREA: FT2 (A) NUMBER OF STOkIES: TOTAL BUILDING AREA: ^"Y-�- 4. DETERMINE BASIC FIRE FLOW FROM TABLE 111, USING AREA (A): /:'j(I GPM (8) 5. DETERMINE OCCUPANCY FACTOR ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: :3/2 , GPM (C) IF LOW AAZARD, SUBTRACT UP TO 25% W (B): IF HIGH HAZARD, ADD UP TO 25% OF (8) 6. COMPUTE SUB-TOTAL (B+C): (IF B+C IS LETS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) /�(p .?, J GPM (D) 7. DETERMINE SPRINKLER ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: �- GPM (E) (IF COMPLETELY SPRINKLERED, SUBTRACT UP TO 50% OF (D): IF LIGHT HAZARD OCCUPANCY AND FIRE RESISTIVE OR NDN-COMBUSTIBLE CONSTRUCTION, SUBTRACT UP TO 75% OF (D). 8. DETERMINE EXPOSURE ADJUSTMENT: USING THE TABLE AT LEFT AS A GUIDE, ENTER THE SEPARATION AND ADJUSTMENT FOR EACH OF THE "FOUR FACES" OF THE BUILDING IN THE TABLE AT THE RIGHT: SEPARATION MAX. ADJUSTMENT EXPOSURE SEPARATION ACT. ADJ. 0 - 10 25% MAX. NORTH " ' ADD 20 % 11 - 30 20% MAX. EAST ADD�rF, 31 - 60 15% MAX. SOUTH /5 ADD _ _B 61 -100 A.p 10% MAX. WEST` ADO �_ % 101 -150 58 MAX. TOTAL % OF ADJUSTMENT 150 OR 4-HR WALL 0% MAX. (NOT TO EXCEED 75%) : �� $ (TOTAL % ADJUSTMENT TIMES (D) ADJ''7_.TMENT: GPM (F) 9. DETERMINE ROOF AND SIDING COVERING ADJUSTMENT: a (IF SHINGLE COVERING, ADD 50U GPM) ADJUSTMENT: V GPM (G) 10. COMPUTE ESTIMATED FIRE FLOW REQUIRED: ;z / g (IF D+E+F+G IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) d` (IF D+E+F+G IS GREATER THAN 12,000 GPM, INSERT 12,C.,O GPM)(D+E+ +G) REQU RED FIRF FLOW: 600 / GPM (H) 11. SIGNED: ;'.ATE RLUUIRED FIRE FLOW CALCUL IONS , I. HAZARD IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION �j NAMEawe t _ U.B.C. CLASS OF BUILD_,zT--3 � ADDRESS 7j, 71 FIRE MCAT AREA _ 2. DETERMINE TYPE OF CONSTRUE - CLASS (CIRCLE ONE): V FIRE-RESISTIVE N--C OMB UST13 ORDINARY WOOD FRAME MIXED (NOTE: IF "MIXED", S7_SPA INSTRUCTION FOR AREA AND BASIC FIRE FLOW) 3. DETERMINE AREA: GROUND FLOOR AREA: 7D 66 FT2 (A) NUMBER OF STORIES: TOTAL BUILDING AREA: 4. DETERMINE BASIC FIRE FLOW FROM TABLE 01, USING AREA (A): la6j GPM (E; 5. DETERMINE OCCUPANCY FACTOR ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: IF LOW HAZARD, SUBTRACT UP TO 25% OF (8): IF HIGH HAZARD, ADD UP TO 25% OF (8) 6. COMPUTE SUB-TOTAL (B+C): (IF B+C 1S LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) 7. DETERMINE SPRINKLER ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: GPM (E) (IF COMPLETELY SPRINKLERED, SUBTRACT UP TO 50% OF (D): IF LIGHT HAZARD OCCUPANCY AND FIRE RESISTIVE OR NOV-COMBUSTIBLE CONSTRUCTION, SUBTRACT UP TO 75% OF (D). S. DETERMINE EXPOSURE ADJUSTMENT; USING THE TABLE AT LEFT AS A GUIDE, ENTER THE SEPARATION AND ADJUSTMENT FOR EACH OF THE "FOUR FACES" OF THE BUILDING IN THE TABLE AT THE RIGHT: SEPARATION MAX. ADJUSTMENT EXPOSURE SEPARATION ACT. ADJ. 0 - 10 25% MAX. NORTH 7 1 f ADD / $ 11 - 30 20$ MAX. EAST ADD 31 - 60 15% MAX. SOUTH ADD 61 -103 10% MAX. WEST ADD 101 -150 5$ MAX. TOTAL $ OF ADJUSTMENT 150 OR 4-HR WALL 0% MAX. (NOT TO EXCEED 75%) 0 $ (TOTAL % ADJUSTMENT TIMES (D) A", TMENT: , S GPM (F) 4. DETERMINE ROOF AND SIDING COVERING ADJUSTMENT: (1F SHINGLE COVERING, ADD 500 GPM) ADJUSTMENT: - GPM (G) 10. COMPUTE ESTIMATED FIRE FLOW REQUIRED: (IF D+E+F+G IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) (IF D+E+F+G IS GREATER TrIAN 12,000 GPM, INSERT 12,QJ1 GPM) �j (D+E+F+G) REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: v�D GpM (H) 11. SIGNED: :.,ATE 0 [p OF RF PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT z sa RICHARD C. HOUGHTON v DIRECTOR 0 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO, RENTON,WASH.98055 9 � a 206 235-2569 �,TfO SEPItOO; BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH September 23, 1986 MAYOR MEMORANDUM TO: Ron Olsen FROM: Dick Houghton SUBJECT: Fireflow Analysis - Fancher Flyways Renton Municipal Airport Ron: The subject fireflow analysis was discussed at the last Aviation Committee Meeting. I want you to arrange for RH2 to perform said analysis for Fancher flyways' Hangar Proposal (see attached layout) and in conjunction with new water main project. Also attached is earlier information from 3rd Floor for Fireflows. Note: The 45' x 95' hangar should be studied on the basis of: a) Aircraft storage only and, b) Aircraft storage plus Repair 3 Mtc. It is important that the two categories be identifiable separately in terms of the increase in FF requirements for (b). ;C X( �tf VL:pmp J C3'/ts!`/� t.:�lJ / •'• :�;� yt.rl;. rj r.•,1 �'/1.J . bOCH _ E rJ M. (/JF orut v , AS dip/rNvJA I�f UJE /7t7/71710✓AE f'Fc c r"i i T� Mat/ ,ee a TO: Ron Nelson, Building Official FROM: Richard Houghton, Public Works Director SUBJECT: Proposal by rancher Flyways to Construct New llangars on Renton Airport Ron: Attached are (?) copies of.a letter from Fancher; a layout of the proposed buildings and a brochure describing the "Fulfab" metal hangars involved. We are hoping to be able to give the Aviation Committee some basic informa- tion to help them deal with tnis matter on Tuesday, October 29, 0:00 a.m. Oil a preliminary review basis only can you please arrange for the submittal to us of comments ref, such items as: • need to relocate fire hydrant on west side of property • estimated timing of the complete process - ERC; Condi- tional Use Permit; Building Permit, etc. • any other information which will be of help in discussing the development proposal with rancher (hanks - Vl:pmp cc: Aviation Committee j' ew '` oj S�4t00 Y I .90 mm 'rx � �Od A TD naN,coJ Ms- -7 NSpofOYJ ✓ V-t)NVH M,3 : Nl S-)< ^-7,fH�Nb� t i 7 . NMI— 'FUL AIRCRAFT HANGARS 1 The Modern Answer in Aircraft T-Hangars FULFAB, INC. 1525 WHIPPLE AVE. S.W. • BOX 1365 • CANTON, OHIO 44708 PHONE 216 - 477-7211 - A f n • • ". •. ,. µ . • 1 I < IP �,.�! • w .1,. ter' yay;3sB' 1OMW " Select the models that meet your need...in size... -up door style line �, lam♦, to you, probably, is the fact that Fulfab T•Hangars can be ASSEMBLE, cnnels are lifted into place, attached to the erected by almost.any available labor and can be dismantled foundation N,d boiled to the �idjaeent connecting members, and moved it necessary. No specie. tools are needed. Fulfab T-Hangars are pre-engineered and quantity pro- FULL NESTED PLAN USES SHORTER TAXIWAY duced for low cost.All-steel component parts are sure-fitting. Where building length is lim'.led, or where taxiways must be You may add more units to lengthen the hangar at any time kept short,the Fulfab FULL NESTED "T" uses space to best without difficulty. Complete foundation and erection plans advantage. You can 'store more planes per lineal foot" arq furnished prior to shipment of material. PANELIZED DESIGN greatly simplifies and speeds the enclosing of walls and partitions. Nearly all the sidewall materials may be as- sembled into panels In the flat prior to erection. QUICK TO WINTERIZED for "Snow Country" GALVANIZED for Long-Run Savings FULFAB gives you a very generous overhang of the root COST OF UPKEEP is a vital consideration. That's why gal- sheets, shedding drippage far out from the doors, minimiz• vanized exterior walls and roof are standard on Fulfab T- ing freezeup problems. Mini-slot bottom guides for doors Hangars. Our buildings are UNIQUE in that most of the reduce friction and contribute to trouble-free operation. , structural members such a purlins, girts, door track, door It is important to check up on the way hangers have per- frames, center columns, etc. are also made of galvanized steel. formed in an environment comparable to your locale. We If you have old T-Hangars at your field, you will appreci- can direct you to nearby fie!ds where Fulfab T-Hangars give ate the superior durability and good looks of galvanized the most satisfactory service in difficult freezing weather. Fulfab "structurals." —,pwft—�!, it ) I' J) i � i rip SLIDING DOORS Note how root leas Electric Power-Lift BI-FOLD DOORS are factory assembled into large panels. Each sliding sec- DELUXE "push button convenience" Is offered on four Ful- tion is carried on top roller bearings which ride on non- tab models(two OT's and two LK's)which have doors raised fouling monorail tack. The leaves are kept steady and true or lowered by 3/. H.P. motor and self-braking worm gear. along the bottom by intermittent guides. COLORS AVAILABLE E FOR WALL 8 DOOR SHEETING r Sliding door leaves come BEIGE WHITE BLUE to site ready to hang, BOTH STANDARD "T" & FULL NESTED "T" are available in any number of units STANDARD -T' FULL NESTED "T" -t- OFFICE NO 2 NO. . B NO,2 NO. 4 9 + 1 E D TIC I'CLEAR�I NO. 1 NO. 3 E t CLEAR'{ F A CLEAR WIDTM� OFFICE NO. 1 NO. 3 A CLEAR R WIDTH CLEAN SLIDING MODEL A a O E HEIGHT SLIDING YODEL A a C D E HEIGHT DOORS LT-42 41'-8" 16' 32 20'-8" 11'-7" DOORS LT-42N 141'-8" 16 1 16' 48' 20'-8" 11'-7' WITH OT•42 41'-8" 1 16' 1 32' 20'-8" 12'-0" WITH LK- - SO' 20'-8" 12• 0^' 0' 18 -0"BI-FOLD OT-44 4F-8" 20' 40 BI-FOLD LK444 438 ' 'DOORS OT-48 4T-8" 1 20' 1 40. 23'-8" 14'-0" DOORS LK-48 4T•8" 20' 18' I SB' 23' 'LK-42 end LK-44 PW &Iy C&IW LK-3anti LKd reswto aly j EACH AODL a Q 44 UNIT-ADD ww LTaW ,>``-' r- ?47` laB . ','(41• 743' a'fb Z MY' man ! 1 a 2w r FULFAB AIRCRAFTI rHANCARS 1525 WHIPPLE AVE. S.W. • BOX 130 • CANTON, OHIO 44708 . 216-477.7211 Manutauure.reserves me.gnt to na.e cnaryes x:muut noece.n poce oex,gn Tode�s and speotacauons _,.81 ate: 09-0tt-66 Crty Of Nento . Department of Enga neennq Da¢ I Airport Neat/South PWI@Itw Road Utilitits 6 Purging City of saline Contractor Contractor Contractor III ate En lArtrs Estaute C.atratttt 9 "COCCOLO CUISTO'�C710N INC COAL EICAVATINB INC Pan 6 sm CONSI. INC COLUMIO CHIT M Ices ors Description Unit Eal. Unit Dad Du. Du. flait lip unit Bid Unit kid limit hit Oubat l ty PnI 44Dvi Frice (count Pratt Amount Pr¢e Amount Price Yost SCREW A" 01. 65 12 lath Ductile Iran Pipe [:oral Foot 2,67C.W 34.00 90Mc OC 16.00 69,550.00 30.M 80,250.M 21.15 N,Its.:5 30.00 R0,2SO.M Class 57 02. 65 B inch Ductile Iron Pipe alined foot 30,00 12.M MOM 33.W 990.W 19.00 540.W 21,W 714.W SO.W 9W.W Class 52 03. 65 6 inch Ductile Iron Pipe 'meal coot IS.M 23.W 345.110 30.00 /50.W I6,W 24o.W 27.25 318.75 20.W 3W.W Class 52 04. 65 16 inch Ductal, 1 0 pail utintal Pot 210.00 65.00 13,m5f.00 60.00 12,6M.W 60.00 12,600.W 71.W 5,414.W SS.W II,SSO.M• Class 52 05. 65 12 Inch ate Valve ml mach 3.00 1350.00 4,050.00 Mom Lihoo.W 1950.W 5,850.M 2050.W b,ISO.W 16W.00 S,fW.W Collett Vault 06. 6S 101nch cite Valro d 4,10 7.00 650.00 4,550.00 11M.09 1,1W.W 850.00 5,950.00 cost Iro 675.W 4,725,00 7W.00 /,eW.W Iron Ilk, as 07. 65 5 n-h 0%Standard fire hydrant aEath 7.00 liamm 1112Ch00 18n0.00 12.600.00 1750.00 11,250.00 1350.M 9,ISO.W ISW.W t0,S00.M Assessly M. 65 Cement Connate Pa rhrust bCWic yard 60.00 70.00 /,206.M 125.00 7,SW.M Blcctiq SO.W S,OW.M W W W 95. S,IOI. ]S. /,SW.W O4. 65 and lip Bills] for t7oh I,ab.W 6.010 11,196.00 1.W 11,196.00 B.W 1"928.M 10.50 19,593.W irenrh hacifA17 $.Do 91130.00 to. 6`. SIB inch Minus Crum. Rod IT" 200.00 12.W 2,/W.W 12.W 2,4".W I2.00 2,400.00 for Trench ac1[ill and 11.00 2,200.00 15.00 3,MO.M iq Corse It. 65 Asphalt Lament Class D s. elos 114.00 55.00 6.270.00 56.50 6,669.00 55.00 6,270.W 15.W 7,110.W 70.M 7,9M,M Parinq Asp lit ior 7rnth p4tchI44 �m1�h 0IN1s' IL 65 Ater Service Type it, 014th 8.00 330.00 2,640.00 375.00 3,000.00 750.00 b,No.Do 600.00 4,600.00 /00.O9 3,200.00 13- 65 Wrtttal lai input tin Standard l4rl tot 11.00 125.00 1,750,W 400,W 5,600.00 250.W .1,500.00 30D.W I,2W.W Ny/rmt A-wei "0.00 4.20,00 14, 6S Rabilitatine #Lump Sea 1.DO 1000.W 2,MD.DO I1xv.00 12,500.0 2500.00 2.500.ov Bw.00 6,00.00 10000.W 10,0W.W Date. 09-Ut1-16 E.t, 01 Renlw . Deoarttent of Eamw11n9 Page 2 Allan tlwllaoulh Ptrieittl Road Ulilltiw a Pc.wp Gt, of Within Cwtractw Cwtraclur Lwlractw Cwtrattw Ott mate b4inwrt Estleatt SCOCCuLO CONSTRUCTION 101 KOHL EICAYATIR6 INC POPE 6 SONS COH41. INC COLUCCIO COAST CO It"lure Detcriol,w Un,t Est. Unit Bid Unit Bid Unit Bid Unit Bid Ikii lid k. MD. Quantity hue Amount Prrze Amount Price drawl Price Awat P'ir- Aeowt L. 65 Co.structtw Stalin; and Ar6u,it -:,OO Sue 1.00 1800,00 1,600.00 2500.00 2,500.00 2500.00 2,500.00 2500.00 "500.00 ISD0.00 11500.00 Metes 16. 65 Finish and Elden u9 -LOP Su 1.00 2000.00 2,000.00 I000.00 21000.00 WOO.DO 5,000.00 4000.00 1,DOD.00 1000,00 1,000.00 17, 65 ",a Wool -S9uare Yard 700.00 2.50 1,750.00 0.50 3%.00 2.00 1,400.00 0.50 350.00 1.00 700." 15. E5 loose Lght Rt1 RIP Can 490.DO 32.00 15,360.00 22.00 10,540.00 10,00 I,ON.DO 2!.00 10,590.00 15.00 7,000.00 19. 65 Steel Gsin9 'tor 21 inch duwla -Lineal Pot 08.00 75.00 3,600,00 175.00 0,400.00 200.00 9,. 0.00 24.00 1.152.00 100.00 4,600.00 0.375 inch will thickness 70. 65 7 inch Air 6 Vaccuw release Each 1.00 450.00 450,00 1,250.00 I,M.00 700.00 700.00 k50.00 450.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 ,alut with Dot 21. 65 3 Lith Duwt•r PVC 101twlrY -Lintel Sot 760.00 1.50 1,110.DO 7.00 5,320.60 7.00 5,320.00 6.00 11560.00 5.00 3.000.00 codult SCM 40 22. 65 TeleeelerY Pull Io- Each 5.00 450.00 1.250.00 400.00 2,000.00 250.00 1,250.00 600.09 31000.00 ;J0.00 500.00 21. 65 Too Soil -T0n 106.00 20.00 2,160.00 5.00 560.00 12.00 1,296.00 11.00 1,1111.00 20.00 2,140.0010 WAWA] ScReeule A" 186,371.00 169,575.00 188,I40.00 111,023.00 I11,U1.p 0.11 Salts lu 15,04.05 15,35 w 15,239.N 13,917.66 10,477.27 Total s0filult A" 201,467.05 204,930.56 203,363.66 105,740.66 1113,102.27 Date: 09-00-96 CRY Of Reston . D"ittaenl of Engineering Poke S Airport wheal/South Paruitw RUE Utahhn L Parean9 Cestralp Contractor Collector Cmt"CAM Cnlntlw hf Date A.L.ALIA CD %CRLI%D CORSTRIETI011 R.R.SCOIT CD%STR. CO DYQ CONSTRUCTION IRC U%IVER511L10115 CUCSI, It" Bars Desmplaon Untt Est. unit lad Unit Bid Wit lad oil kid Wit lid No. No. Quantity Plate 4g t Prate "out Price Aaoent Price A mint Price daounl SCIEW ` A.. 01. 65 12 Inc wchle Iron Pipe alunal font 2X5.D0 28.N 77,414.50 25.00 416,675.00 10.00 00.210.00 12.OD BS,6W.M C.60 al?,)SS.W Class 52 02. 65 8 inch Ductile Iron Pape .Lineal FUt 30.00 38.10 1,10.00 20.0 6W.W 30.DO 9W.W 75.W 2,250.00 30,OD 9W.W Class 5 O3. 65 6 inch Ductile !'on Pill -lineal Fait 15.00 38.80 582.00 16.00 140.00 10.00 210.00 /0.00 606.00 D.AC 315.W Class 57 04. 65 10 amek Wchie Iron Pap, .Lineal Fool 210.00 13.10 17.598.00 21.0 I,410.O /5.00 9,/50.00 122.00 I5,420.00 IS.W 1;,65�Class 51 03. 65 12 lack fiat, Val"ml ,Fit„ 3,00 15W.0 1,50.00 1800.00 S,/W.W 2000.00 6,000.00 1600.00 I,BW.00 1910.W S,B20.W,eaScrete Vault 06. 65 10 Inch site Val" e/ itach 7.0 600.00 Moom Valre lot 650.00 1,550.W 750.00 5,250.0 000.00 5,600.00 Cast I'm925.W 61175.00 07, 65 5Inch RK Sbnd+rd Fire %ydraat ,Each 7.00 1500.00 10.500.00 1600.00 11,2W.W 1BW.W 1"600.0^ 1800.00 12,6W.W :9B5./C 17,193.W Alterably 01. 6! Ce t Collett For Thrust +Cubic Tw2 60.00 60.0 31600.O 30.00 I,BW.W 150.00 9,0W.W ;p,W 3,OW.W 9 6S.W 1, W.W/IxYuq 01. 65 lads to 6n"1 to, a7U 9e6.00 7.00 13,062.00 6.00 11.196.W 7.00 13,062.00 d.01 M."Tr 6.60 I2,31Trench BacHill to. 65 5/0 tale%imam Clusdod Rock a1" 200.0 10.00 7,OW.00 11.00 2,1O.00 15.00 3,0W.W 14.00 2,W.00 pow Irmch II.W I,2W.ae 40flil Add top Coarse !1. 65 Awe), Covent Ctasf 8 a/ tTom II/.W 60.00 61140.00 65.00 7,/10.00 /0.00 4,560.00 65.00 7,410.60 P4,1e1 Asphalt Fw Trouth Patchlry SLW 613414.00 AP 11. 65 Note, Service Typo III apwh B.W 250.W "eOU.00 200.00 1,600.00 I00.00 3,2W.W 300.00 21/00.00 325.00 2.60.00 13. 65 Wrtica7 041416tpent For Standard .Vert Foil 14.00 300.00 1,2W.W IW.W I,IW.O 1O.00 5,6O.00 300.00 1,2W.00 Hydrant /W.W 5.6W.N Availably 14. 65 %obiltaatim .Lump Sul 1.00 2OW.00 20,000.00 250W.00 25,00.0 I/SW.W 17,500.00 11816.70 11,816.70 "00.00 1.9W.00 Wlel 09-Ccb16 city of Roston . Department el Fagims,lAg top 1 Airport 4st71euth Ps,utter RonA Utilities 6 pavung Contractor Contractor Contracts, Contractor Conlratler MI Bate R.L.ALIA CO HEALING CONSTRICTION R.R.SCOTT CONSTR. CO OYU CORSTRUCTIDN INC UNIVERSALILAND CORSI. It" IV$ Description Unit Est. Unit lid Unit bid Uait bid Wit RIO volt h/ Duantity PI is Mount Pests Anounl Price Apoont Price AGM Prite A on t 13. 65 Construction Stating and Aa-Built alupo Sus 1.00 3000 00 3,000.00 2000.00 2,000.00 7700.00 2,700.DO 2000.00 2,000.00 I000.00 2,000.00 "tot 16. 65 Isaiah and Clean as *Luon Suit 1.00 1000.00 1,000.00 3000.00 31000.00 1500.00 1.500.00 1000.00 1100.00 500.00 506.00 11. 65 Rvdro Sewing s5guare Yard 700.00 1.50 1.050.00 1.00 700.00 1.60 1,120.00 1.00 700.00 7.00 I.40O.00 11. 65 Loose Light Ail Pat alon 400.00 15.00 7,200.00 30,00 11.400.00 20.00 9,600.00 2C.00 9,600.00 9.00 4,320.00 19. 65 Steel Cass" ^toe Ion iW gladiator 01.1.061 Toot 46.00 70.00 31360.00 W.00 2,600.00 600.00 19,200.00 200.00 9,600.k 111.00 51326.00 0.375 inch .611 thictnesa 20. 63 2 Inch Alt 1 Vatcuon release *Each 1.00 11000.00 11000.00 600.00 600.00 1,100.00 1,100.00 1,200.00 1,200.00 I,IOD.00 1,100.00 valve Vito but 21. 6s 3 Inch Diameter PVC 1pimtry •Liitsal Fool 760.00 6.20 4,712.00 4.00 3,040.00 6.25 4,750.00 2.00 1.590.00 5.75 4,570.00 Coodolt c(A AO 22. 65 Telaetiry pull Mt +Each 5.00 100.00 500.00 100.00 500.00 1.:10.00 61050.00 222.00 1,110.00 700.00 3,500.00 23. U Top $011 *loon 108.00 20 i0 2060.00 20.00 2,160.00 23.00 2,I6/.00 ?..DO 2,700.00 20.00 2,I0.0 Subtotal Schedule .. A.. 191,6/2.50 17I,681.00 219,146.00 IM,IIs.0 2n,N;.W 6.11 Sales Ia. 15.523.06 16.003.36 17,750.13 16,0/9.T7 11,034.46 Total Schedule A" 207,10.54 166,114.36 231,►98.13 2M,IK.1� 2/0,612.M Bale% 09-ki-4 Gtr of R1,tnn . Decartaeot W Eog,werinq Pop S AlrOort Yost/South Permta Awe Ut.,1ti" 6 PareInq Contrecler Contractor Bid Out, CO VALLEY CERENT Call. CO SAC CONSTRUCTOR INC It" Bars Desvotion Unit Est. Unit Bid Dui. Bid Non No. Wantst, Price Aaounl Price mount SCHEDULE A" 01. 65 12 ia<h Duct'le lrm plot Slaal Foot 2,675.W 31.00 90,950.00 47.09 175,725.00 Class 52 02. 65 0 inch Ductile Iran Pip kwal Foot 30.W 145.00 1,350.00 30.00 MOD Class SI 03. 65 6 tncn Ductile Iron Poe 'Lail Fool 15.00 77.00 405.00 20.00 W.00 Class 52 06. 65 10 inch Ductile Iron Pipe 'Until Fool 210.00 M.00 59,B50." 401.00 Bd,DW.K Class 52 05. 65 12 join Sate valse d 'Earn 3.00 2300.00 6,900.00 3n00.00 9,000.00 &wrote Vault Do. 65 10 Ines Site Vat" ./ 'Each 7.00 100.00 6,300.00 700.00 1,900,D0 Cast Iron Valv1 Bw 07, 65 5 Inch PRO Standard Fire N9dr4ot #Each 7,00 2000.00 14,000.00 2000.00 16,000.00 Assembly N. 65 Cowl Concrete For thrust 'Cuace Yard 60.00 75.00 1,500.00 75.00 4,500.00 Blocks" 09. 63 Bank Ron 6ra"1 Far rim 1,066.00 6.50 12,179.60 6.50 1"129.00 . irnnch Bacti.11 10, 65 518 inch Raw Crushed RASE Stan 200.00 19.00 1,000.00 ,p,pp 2,ppp,pp for Iaoih Uc6fi11 add Top Coarse It. 65 Asphalt Cannot Class 8 NJ aim 114.00 60.00 6,8/0.00 65.00 7,410.00 P8aIn1 Asphalt fer Irma Patch'" 12. 65 Naler Svuicl 1Y7e III 'Each 8.00 300.00 2,400.00 300.00 2,400,00 13. 65 Vertlal Adlestaenl fu Standard avert Fnnt 14.00 150.00 2,100.OD e50.00 6,300.00 N'drant As"861t 14. Na Noliloration -Lou Sun 1.m 2926.10 26,926.80 35D00.DO 35,000.01) at-s Og-Oct-M6 Litr o1 Neaten . DeParteent o9 Engfeewinq Pop It Airport Ikst7South Porurtor Fwd utilities b pa.eng Contractor Contractor W ate CO VALLEY CERM7 CWI. CO KAC CUSTRIlCII1W INC It" Ws lim"Ptiw trait Est. that 0se unit hie Ma. No. Quantity Price Amount Price tmk 15, 65 Cwstructiw Stall q 4-6 As-6wlt ILumo 5, 1.00 2500.00 2,500.00 5000.00 S.000.00 MOPS 14. 65 finish and Clean up slew Sue 1.00 1500.00 1,500.00 500.00 500.00 17. 65 MYerA Spading 44,11re Yard 700.00 1 00 IN.do 0.50 350.00 18. 65 Lowe Llghl flip Dap slop 400.4 35.00 16.800.00 15.00 7,200.00 19. 65 Steel Casing PIP' 2A inch ecafeter µlnal Fort 40.00 150.00 7,200.00 400.00 19.200.00 0.375 inch all th„6nees 20. 65 2 inch Air i Vaccuw release -Each 1.00 1,200,00 1,200.00 1,000.00 11000.00 r61.1 nth be, 21. 63 3 Inch Biawter PVC lelvmkrf µfain imot 760.Y 5.00 3,800.00 3.00 2,280.00 Coaled SCe 40 22. 63 lalewlory Pull as -Er 5.00 150.00 150.00 a00.00 J,040.00 23. 65 Top Soil 4100 1".00 15.00 1,620.00 20.00 2,I0.00 • Subtotal 5ohwule " A" 277,72u,80 341,254.00 6.II Spin las 71,479.10 78,289,51 Intel S[hedule A" 299,999,g8 31),513,5' Tate: 14-Ort-16 Cilt of Into . Bq{rtaut of Engineering Fag* 1 Airport BestlSaste pwloltw Road Utilities 6 Pay n.9 City of Aentm Coot'actq IIId Date KOK EICor Contractor Contractor EnIl.t Est ma, SCOCCOLO CRSIAUCIIOB INC Cell EICFVF/IBS IBC PpUE 6 SONS COBSI. IBC CA!1,110 t0B57 CO It" tan Description m,t EFL U„1 Id Unit Itl Unit Bid Unit Bid No, Bo. a wII tr Price "Wt Pnu "Not price I:d Prix* Aasunt Price Faswnl Pnu Fasnl SCNEOULE " 1" 01. 67 B into Shelter, Sher Pye 'Lineal Foot 7,357.00 33.00 77,781.00 13.00 30,641.00 complete 1n place 25.00 SB,C 11 5.00 .50 SOUS.SC IS.w 100,065.00 0'. 67 6 inch Sam tar, Sever Plan -until Pool 60.00 24.00 1,440.00 10.00 600.00 16.00 1,080.00 IL50 810.09 consist* a Place 30.00 11W.00 03. 67 1 Inch!mettle Iran Pqe with -Lineal Fool 35.W 38.00 I,A0.00 20.00 700.00 20.00 700.00 65.00 7 Class A 1Ndlnq for S*wr PIN ,2 5.00 80.00 2,MIND 04. 61 4 inch Ductile Iron Pip* Force 'Lineal Foot 180.W 16.00 2,880.00 12.50 2,moo Man for Sold, W.00 10.00 1,1 36.00 6.N0.09 50.00 9,000,W • 05. 67 some Standard Mnnol' aEath 11.D0 1500.00 16,500.00 1500.00 1.1.500.00 1950.00 20,350.00 1180.00 16,280.00 1750.00 1/,150.00 06. 67 Outside Ductile low Flo, #Each 1.00 MOO 850.00 1000.00 11000.00 I500.00 1,500.00 930.00 no. e00.00 000.00 Orop Connection to behalf 07. 67 CNaecllm to C,Isf,nq Line to 'Each 3.00 500.00 1,5N.00 500.00 1,500.00 500.00 1.500.00 1150.00 31150.00 600.00 1 Boo.00 Structure M. 67 I'mndalun Batwul -Tin 1,196,00 q.50 11,36LOD 6.50 7,774.00 10.00 ..,960.00 12.09 14,372.00 0.10 i19." N, 67 Ud M 8raml far Trench #Iq, 6.644.DO 6.00 39,964.00 1oc01ill 50 6.OD 79,8/1.00 7. 19,I30.DO 10.50 64.7/2.00 5.00 13,220.00 11. 67 CPBIIaI Iott /w Trench Will) To 500.00 12.00 6.000.00 12.00 61000.00 12.00 6,009.fM 11.00 51500.00 16.00 1,900.00 W TN turn tL 67 ARNIE Emirate with Pau,p #Ton 245.00 55.00 !3,475.00 58.00 14,210.00 55.D0 13,475.00 /5.00 15,925.00 70.10 I7,150.00 0N6a11 for Street Restoration aM Trench Patching S 1'. /7 1 F 4 Iech in, 'Each 4.00 75.D0 300.00 50.w 2001 00 75.00 MOO 05.m U0.06 �'�` 40.00 160.40 IS. V EFtra Depth for Standard Ilau,hale 'Vwl Fast 4.00 110.00 440.D0 150.00 600.00 100.00 /00.00 120.00 110.00 10,00 320.00 14. 67 Bglace Couple c.re Ind -Lineal Foot 200.00 6.50 1,300.00 12.0 letter, 1,6D0.00 1.50 1,700.00 11.00 2,Im.60 12.00 1,Ie0.00 Win 4111-Ott-B6 city of Renton . Dpartnnt of togitterinB •Bye 1 Airport att/Smtb Pwtntw Aug Uttltttts 6 P#ewnp city of later Conlractw Contractor Cmlrmctb [wtrutb%to Date Eyiners Estimate SCOCCOLO CONSTRUCTION IAC A014. ESCHA1115 IBC BADE 6 tar COBSI. IK rmtratP CNIi p Ito B, Wm/eta Gnl Est. IMiI 41 Unit Bit Unit Bid Wit I'd Welt lid Bp. M. Ouanttty Price Mont Price haunt Pnte Aaat Fete Amount hat Baw 15. 6- Insimll City Supplied Pup Stattm eWp Sum 1.00 6000.00 6,000.00 500.00 5.OOC.00 35W.W 3,5W.W 129W.00 12,9W.W nd Construct IIPA`.W II,OW.W at Vol) Cpoplete It. 6' SKaoamly, and S#iwpe Esist,np #Each 2.00 1500.00 3,000.W 2500.00 5,000.00 20W.W A,WO.W 2170,W 4,240.0 Paid, 20W.W /,0W.00 5tatla6 and Bet Melt, Aalllcat[m 'Lup See 1,00 0000.00 B4OW.W 20500.00 20,SW.00 150.00 1,500.00 10000.00 10,WO.00 low DO 10,00.00 M E7 Caetrattim Staktey mad At-Built atup See 1.00 MOM 7,OW.00 2500.W 2,500.00 3000,00 3,WO.W 2500.00 21500.00 IOW.W I,OIO.a •Mtn 19. 67 '..,a ad Clem ua #Lump Sys 1.00 2000.00 2,000.a 1500.0 I,SW.Do 2500.00 2,5W.00 4500.00 4,500.00 MAO I40.00 20. 67 B lath DIP CI 57 a~ pipe #40al Fat 12.00 5.1.00 3,744,00 70,00 I,440.00 N. 1,440.00 31.00 2,232.00 At al 10.W S,Da.W alb win mew arnLngs Subtotal Stbaal# , 1" l44,76a.W 1a0,179.80 190,660.00 225,911.50 229,724.60 6.11 Sales Tic 16,1111,05 12,974.50 15,154,t6 IB,M.IS 11,60'.49 Total 6tbaule " D 215,947.OS 173,153.50 206,714.b If/,110.73 2y,332.19 Date: 04-Ort-16 Alv 94 Amouon . Dmntwnt 04 E.gmen:ng pap 9 Argwl ➢est3outh Pnmter Road Ut q:bra t Pavnng Cmtractw Contractor Contractor Contractor ContractorB:t Date R.L.ALIA CD MERLINU CONSTRUCTION A.m.SC071 CONSTR. CO DIOR LOMSIRUCIION INC INIIVERSALILM MI. Ilea Bars Description wit Est. Unit ➢Id 1Ev;t pad Uhl ➢d Unrt III gait Bid No. No, Rumhb Price Amount Price Aewnt Price Asphalt P"Ce Rmoml Price RempIE SCHEDULE .. 1" 06 61 1 inch Stnitary Sew, Pipe #,,.eat fact 2,157.00 33.90 79,902.30 55.00 129,635.00 49.00 I01493.00 75.90 176,775.p 61.13 1w.629.95 complete In place 01. 67 6 loth Sanitary Gear, Pipe 'Lineal iwt 60.00 28,00 1.680,00 25.00 1,500.o0 40.00 2,400.00 35.00 7,100.00 25.00 1,500.00 coalk, 1. Piace 03. 61 8 inch Dxtile Iron pit. with 'L:nval iwl 3S.D0 50.00 11750.00 10.00 1.330.00 400.00 14,D00,00 IN.00 3,500.00 71,50 2,71-50 Itaw A N16og for Scan Pipe 64. 67 4 Inch ➢vC1111 l,nn Plot forte -Lineal iwt 110.D0 20.00 31600.00 20.00 3,600.00 12.00 21160.00 16,o0 1.860,00 30.00 5,4 ,.* Met. 4e, Smut, 05. 67 48loth Standard Ma.hoie #Etch 11.00 1000.00 11,000.00 1500.00 16,5w.00 1500.00 16,500.00 16DO.00 17,400,00 141.00 16,225.00 Ad. 61 Outside Ductile Iron Pip# #Each 1.00 1500.00 1.500.00 i0D0.00 1,000.OD I500.Oo 1,500.00 100.00 900.00 1200.00 1.200,00 Drop Cmmini to Manhole V. 47 Ciamp is to Eaisting Line or 'Each 3.00 1000.00 31000.00 500.00 1,500.00 250.00 750,DC 3' .00 1,050.00 700.00 I.100.01 Stnttere 04. 67 Pomdatim Material Qw 1,196.00 11.00 I1,526.00 8.00 9.568.00 12.00 14,552.00 14.00 1.,744.00 9.75 II,"1 00 09. 67 Iasi Am &meet 4w Irma a;on 11,644,00 7.00 I6.501.00 b.DO 39.864.00 7.00 461Re.00 0.01 All. 6.44 43,15D.� Iath4:11 10. V CrwMd Ruch for lrnfh bachi 11 #ton Sm.00 10.00 5.0Ou.00 12.00 6,000.00 IS.00 7.500.DO 14.00 7,000.p It.00 5,500.00 W T1p Curse 11. 67 Asphalt Cmtrete nth paving alm 245.00 6C.00 14,700.00 65.00 15,925.00 46.00 9,100.00 67.00 15,925.0 U." 13,721.44 411111alt vw Strout Aestwatim and botch Patchlag 00 1.. 67 1 16 Inch Item, 'Each 4.00 35.00 140.00 50.00 2w.00 25.00 IDO.Do 100.00 400.00 75.00 300.60 13. 67 Estra Depth for Standard Manhole avert font 4.00 200.00 800.00 200.00 100100 200.00 800.00 I00.00 400.00 29.00 1,000,00 '4_ 67 Oeplace Lmtrele WTI end 4:meai Gout 200.00 15.00 31000.00 10.00 "000.00 10.00 21000.00 16.00 3.100.00 20.00 4,000.00 1,Itter late: 09-Ort-6 CIty of Renton . D,,,twt of Eegioaeriag hP 10 Airoort Yest15onth Perim, Road BtllillU 1 Paveipg Contractor Contractor Contractor kid Date iuntracto, Contractor Ilp lore A.I.ACIA CO AEAEIYO CONSTRICTION A.Y.SCOTY CONSTR. CO DYAD COYSTNUCTIOY IS Wffe[ASAL7EM1 COST. 3'tacrlAnon Unit Est. Unit Bd Unit Bid Unit old IC old Bill No. No. Quantity PT ore Amaunt Pnce Instant Price Aouset Price hoomit or iid ce IAeunt 15. 67 Install City Spoked Pop Stall, atup Son 1.00 low.00 IU,000.00 5000.00 5,000.00 IO WA I6.OW.M 4n0 Constract Net Yell Co IOGW.00 IO,000.W 130M.M 13,OW.00 aplett 16. 67 hcmissim and Saiva9e Enating #Each 7100 ISOU.00 1,000.00 2000.00 1,000.00 1500.00 3,OW.00 Pup Stations ISW.W 3.0;.,W Ip00,M I,OW.M and Yet Yells 17. 67 no I izat ion #Luse Sue 1.00 2DW-00 20.000.00 43000.00 33,OW.W 20500.00 20,500.00 360M.00 36,0W.09 &W.00 I,OW.N IB. /7 Notes Staging and As-twilt rtap Sue I, !ces 50W,M S,Domo 20M.00 2,OW.00 7700.00 2,100.00 2000.00 2,000.00 3500.00 1,5t0,. 19. 67 Finish nag Clean up #Eup Son 1.0 CSW.M 115W.00 30M oo 3,OW.M I50.00 11500.00 IOW.W I,OM.V 500,00 504.00 20. 67 / Inch lip Cl 52 a"" plot runeli coat 72.00 50.M 3,600.00 40,W 2,BB0.00 24,00 1,720.00 15,00 S,IW.W 59.W /,2M.W at NM main over vussings Su1taU1 Srnedbir 1" 237,208.30 219,302.00 179,291.00 305,94e.44 307,04e./s /.It Set es tor. 11,211.07 22,/23.M 27,625.37 total ScheOale , B' 21,71i.01 21,170.11 250,122.17 J04925.I1 J01,111.57 310.113.32 311,91i,21 • Dte-e6 City o1 aenlm . 0epartaent el Eeainwinq pap It rtt/Swth Fennto put Util,he; I Parsing Contractor Cmtrsctw CO VALLEY CEMENT COOT. CO h6C CONSIAUCTION INC Draw I of!0 Dnit Est. Unit Trial Unit did Oumttty Price Mount Price Meant SCNEOULE .. B" 8 inch Sanitary Steer Pipe aLintal Fast :,351.00 52.00 122,561,00 T0.00 161,990.00 complete in place 6 inch Sanitary Same, Pip, 416141 fool 60.00 65.OD 31900.00 40.00 2.4w.00 cmmldete in Piece S inch 6mctsle Iron Pip,nth aLineal Pow 35.00 55.00 1,925.00 115.00 1,025.00 Class A eeddinA for Sever Pipe 1 inch hctile Iron Pipe Fort.. #lineal fort Imm ID5.00 18.9w.OD 50.00 91000.DO • Min {w Sner all standard Mnholl -Late 11.00 30DO.00 33.000.00 2000.00 22.000.00 Unteile tactile I'm Pipe -Each 1.00 12DO.00 1,200.00 1000.00 11000.00 pop reinfection to Manhole Cmaectim to Evstiaq line Or -Each 3.00 450.00 1,350.00 500.00 1,500.00 Structure 1 Famdatim Mtrrul -tin 1,196.00 9.00 10,7b,1.00 I11.00 1/,352.DO 7 Awt pan 6ran1 for lrnch -tan 6,6//.00 6.$0 /3,le6.00 5.00 33,220.00 • Iactfiil d GmmAe/pat for lrew6 dtafill Gee 500.00 19.00 91500.00 10.00 51000.00 aM In Cost" 6T Asphalt Emirate silly Farieq #tan 2/5.00 60.00 14,700.00 65.00 15,925.00 asphalt for Street Medlwatim adif and trench Palchina 67 8 . 6 inch lees #Each 4.00 5D.0D 200.00 25.00 100.00 67 Extra Depth for Standard Manhole 19ert Fml 4.00 250.00 11000.00 200.00 100.00 67 1sp1ae Cpcntr Cerp and '4iaaal Feet 200.00 6.25 11250.00 lom 21000.00 60ttw Dater 09ict-K Coty of WIN Orf"tamot 04 Eaglaerrnq ' 'o U Alrwt Nastfs"Is 9erlatta. laid Ulrlotus E Pavin9 Contractor Coatracto, lid Datf CO VAELfv CENENI CONI. CO W CONSIAUCl10h INC It" Dar% Dncrptsw Unit Est. Unit Bid Unit Did No. No. Quantity P'..(e Amount Pau Amount 15. 67 Install Crt9 SuPolud Pup Station flue Into 1.00 160".97 II,OB9.G1 V000.00 60,000.00 and Construct pet all) Cnp)fte 16. 67 Decommission and S41n90 Eluting #Each 1.00 -500.00 5,000.00 500.'0 ),000.00 Pup Stations and Mt laws 17. 67 "111 atson fluep Sue 1.00 30000.00 30,000.00 37000.00 37,OK.00 ID. 61 CN%t"Ctr0n Slating lid As-Built hup Sus 1.00 I500.00 21500.00 SOOO.DD 5,000,00 • Notes 19. 67 Piaui and Clean up 4u60 Sus 1.00 500.00 500.00 500.00 500,00 20. 67 D inch DIP Cl 52 sear pros fllPeal Pont 7C.00 59,OD a,26B.00 109.00 7,20C.00 at halt, sau over crosaup 50tota) khrdn)e 0" 319,76.97 367,011.00 6.11, Sates ta. 25,IO1.93 3l,atl.97 Total kheaule - B 345,670.90 416,359.17 • late% 09-ott-M City Of kentan . Otparleent of Engirw,al Pap IS airport Beste5putn Poriutw Road Utilities 1 Pare,h9 Clt9 of opt" Coiractw Contractor Cplrrtlw,W Data E uews Estimate Contractor M Soma CA957atimok INC CBIB E1CA9ATING IBC PAPS E SONS COK1. IMC COIIICCID CONS1 CO It" No. 0rsv'�::,on Unit Esl. Unit Bid lloit Bit Unit Bid No. No. Quantity price Apunt Price Ascent Wit Bid Price W h'[e Yount Nice 4mswnl Price Aaaent SCAEOUCE C 01, 30 kup0•e (I'll!'. Yphalt Pa.nenl 'Sgmre wild 820.00 2.00 Ica0.W to, Pareq Gr u, I pp LW ;,2BB.O 1.w 2,460.00 10.00 6,200.00 02. 30 hug", C.uratian -Cubic wild 370.00 5.W 1.050.00 7.00 71590.00 6,W 2,220.0 7.00 2,590,00 6.00 21220.00 03. 10 Concrete Inlet -Each I.W 330.Be 350.(, 600,W, 6W.W 300.00 50.00 SOOM MO.00 90. 500.00 04. 10 1 inch Store Super Pipe 'lineal fool /2•W :5.00 630,W M00 420.00 15.00 630.00 29.00 1.211.00 35.00 1,170.00 05. 30 Crushed Surfacing Top Course itch 175,00 I2.00 2.100.00 17.00 2,1MOD f:.00 7JW.00(SIR smss Ii.(M 1,925.00 15.60 2,621 W 06. 30 Amphalt Concrete Pareeat anclu6ng -lw 110.W 40,00 17,600.00 36.00 15,N0.00 55.00 24,200,0U 'l Asp IB.W 11,120.W 10.f) 19,Bc.,W Pa- Adit fa Psnawd Dwily and LAW Patch," 07, 10 Atlhall E.buded Curt 414ea7 Fool 155.00 7.50 311.50 1.00 465,00 6.50 1,007.50 3.Su 542.50 S.W 775.W 01, /0 Connection to E..atinq -Earn 1.00 200,00 200,W 500.00 500,00 500.00 500.W 9W.W 900.W 3W.W 3W.W Catch Basin Do. 50 6rartl Bwoe -ton 520,W 6.00 31120.00 a.50 11380.00 7.50 319110,00 10.50 5,460.00 b.00 3,120.00 10. 30 irafflc Castro! and Oelo," slums; Sw 1.01, 2.500.00 2,5041.01) 1,000.00 6,00u.00 2,500.00 2,SM.00 I,900.00 /,WO.W 11000.00 11000.09 II. 30 Ao.^-li:alion -lump So 1.00 MIND 150.00 4,000.00 4,000.00 1,500.00 1,50.00 4,000.00 61000.00 101010.00 10,000.00 12, 10 Construction Staling aAd -lump Sp 1.00 Am. 650.00 I,500.W 1,500.W 11000.00I,ON.W 2,S W.W C,SOD.W I,OW.W I,OW.W NIA It Notts 13. 30 Fleiah and Clean-Lit alumsp Son 1.00 650.00 650.00 110W.00 11000.00 I1000.00 I,000.00 4,000.00 /1000.00 :,OW.W I,BW.W Subtotal Schedule C 132,527.54 tI1,b75.M t11,33i.W t51,06.30 l52,o10.W Ntl: 09-Oct-Y City of Rest , , 0e9artmonl 01 Rya 11 Wr Data Nest/South/SmotA 9oriu t Itd or RUA Pli hlm E Pa"i.1 tit, Of Benton Contracla Contractor COelcarlor CootgOtar ItM&r1 Enp Uers Estivate SCOCCOLO CONSTRUCTION INC ROW EICAVATIN6 INC PPE E SONS COAST. INC COLUCCIO COST CO Dalmatian Unit Est. Unit Bid Unit Bid unit Ill Wit aid Wit 1d No. Wo• owtity Pnce Amount Pnce Aooant Prat Amount F"ce Moua1 Price Aswl 1.IS Sal rs A' L,/31.73 4 ,375.60 11,591.34 14.115.24 94,712.11 Total StRadule C tCS,Ih[.23 115,05t./8 //7,9I1.14 q1,390.76 156,722.11 total Schedule "R" f215,947.05 S171,15-50 f70/,I19.66 t211,210.33 f2N,332.I9 Total SUedale "A'- 1201,467.05 $204,930.58 110I,357.66 t115,H0.Ad ft13,IQ.27 Total All 5chedlules t .'X6.33 1423,134.76 1/S!,6I2.1/ IIB1,3/1.75 N97,191.31 • • Date: 09*t-&, Liiv of Realm . Deparbml M Enpneennq raw" 13 Aar06rt best/South Pwultfr Ron, VIlItles E Pamal Conlraclb Cmt,Kto old gate Contractor Cmtncto Cmtrnta Ilr Bars Dpwi,tim Unit Ent. A.L.ALIA CO RERLIM CIAIS7f0KT10N R.N,SCOTI CONSIR CO DYAD COOSIRUCIIDN It No. Mc. Dnit Bib Unit Bit 11110EASAt;LAM d Wmtit7 P.Ici Asont price Unit Bit Wit Id Us1t Bit Aernt fnn Namingiqu Arent Prl;e Arcot S[NEOU.E ' C' 01. 30 Rena Existing Asphalt farerat 'Square Iard 820.00 1.00 2,46C.W 3.60 2.4a.00 fw fa.Isq Owl" 1,2I4.W I,W 3.21o,W 3.25 2,665.09 02, 30 NNW, Escj,,tim 'CAlt lard 370.06 10.00 3.700.00 7,OD C,SPo.00 14.04 3,7f0.00 15.40 5,530.00 6.00 1,210.00 03. 00 Cmeroto Inlet 'Each 1.00 660.00 W1.00 500.00 500.00 bW.W 601.00 50C.64 500.00 600,00 600.DD 04. 60 B Join$ton Spear Poi, ftnseai FAA( 42.00 10.00 MOO IO.W 420.W 20.00 e/4.00 20.00 BIo.W n.W Bwo 05. 30 Crnshpd Surl,cmq Too Course slo 175.00 ID.W 1,750.00 15.00 2,625.00 15.90 7.625.00 14.00 7,450.00 IL.75 2,056.25 t57a" mm ) Do, 30 Asohall Cocrete ParrH Including aloe 440.00 60.00 26.00.00 45.W 19,800.W 4"0 IB,OIO.OP PanaO Asphalt for 70rarat 54.00 22,OW.00 37.00 I6,2BO.W Overlay and Under Patching 07. 40 Asphalt E,trudM Cerb a4neil foot 'S$.00 6.00 930.00 3.00 465.00 2.50 367.50 10.00 1.350.00 1.34 60n.3p D8. 40 Connection, to E,islinq 'Ea(h 1.00 504.00 S0.00 200.410 200.00 I00.00 100.00 150.00 150.00 250.00 250.00 Catch Basin O4. 30 Havel Boron ON 520.00 7,00 3,640.00 6.00 3,120.00 8,00 1,Ib0.G0 0.01 5.20 6.00 4,160� 10. 30 lraff¢ Pmtrol and Dptrr, aluei Sr 1.00 S,000.00 5,000.00 I,W400 1,000.00 S,OW.W 5,000.00 1,000.00 11000.00 1.600.00 IrN0.60 It. 30 Rpbili[atiAn 'l.ur Sr 1.00 5.DW.00 5,DW.W 1,OW.00 1,8W,W 2,000,W 7,OW.00 4,000.0 4,000.0000 2000.0D 7,OW.00 12. 10 Cmstrectlm Staf,nq aso 'Lev See 1.00 3,00.00 3,000.00 1.000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2.DW,W 2,5W,W 2,500.00 700,00 700.00 As-Built Notes 13. SD finish and Clean-Up 'Lisp Sin 1.00 1,500.00 11500.00 1.000.00 I,DW.W I,00.00 I,WO.W 50.00 500,00 5W.00 SW,00 wall) $chyme " C' 151,960,00 A7.18G,DO f11,687.50 f11,325.20 sN,5W.75 Hte: 09-Oct-le City of Amounn . Hprlwnt W Eeq:ne9nnl Airport 11aat/SwtA Pmo,ln Iwo U4Lbe11 pansy Contractor Bid Cwtra[tar Contractor, Cwtr ut0r ContractorContractor!tor ba Hn r A.L.ALIA CO PERL140 CONSTRUCTION R.N.SMTT COIISTR, CO PxAD ETANSTRIrIIIII I[ ONIKRSk/LAIN Cm. 00urgt,w Unit Eat. Uml Yd Unit Y,I Unit 0a1 "at BIG Unit N10 No. No. Yuantrty Price Amount prm Amount pnn "worn Pncf Aapwt Frio ANtwt 0.11 Was Tax t/,ISl.7e t3,01;.58 t3,Sr/.ZY t3,590.31 f2,M1.q Total Scn4ule IP,r,:.76 91E,191.50 315,USY.7B /17,915.51 IS1,p0,11 TOW 5tw0ole 'R" 125e./22.11 1301,925.16 I301,9I i.51 ti1D,Y1},52 ti31,917.21 Total S[AIEIia "A" 120,165.5/ tIH,B0/.36 t236.B1A.03 t21/,195.t3 tt/O,IB2.OA Total All Scwaulef 1522,999.P $529,001.40 t5u,061.10 1592,721.17 $609,966,09 00 Pate: 09-00-86 City of into . Department of fngineen nq • Pop 17 Airport Best/South Ferurter Bud Utilities A Panting Cwl.actor Contractor Bid Data CO VALLEY CENENI Cell. CO AAC CONSIAUC 7IM INC :too Bars lraanptam Volt Est. Unit Bid Unit Bca No. As. Quantity price Room ante AMUnt SCNEWLE L a" 30 Repave Pxtiaq Asphalt F"N of GSon - yard 820.0 5.00 I,I6.00 7.00 1,640.00 far Paring 0.er1+y 02. 30 Rpadur Eccnation aCuhit yard 370.00 10.00 3,700.00 6.00 21220.00 03. /0 Concrete Inlet .Each I.W 60C.00 600.00 Almm 100.00 04. /0 B inth Store Sper Pup rLtaeal Font 42.W 14.00 SBB.4 30.00 1,260.W . 05. SO Crushed Sur Hting ion Course '1" 175.00 MOD :.325.00 1D.00 1.750.00 R/Q" unuP PA. 30 Awhalt Co utlr Parnnt ucludiaq Gim 440.00 37.00 16,280.00 17,W 181MOD Plr,nq Asphalt fen asrNMt O.erlay and tP ur Patching 1% 40 Asphalt Extruded curb .lineal Fmt 155,W 2.30 387.30 3.00 465.00 OL 60 Camaclfm to Ettst,ng .Each I.D<, 250.0 250.00 I,OW.W 1,000.00 Catch Ball. Or, 30 8ravl Bona elm 570.00 1.50 :13W.00 6.00 4,164.00 . 10. 3, iraf',c Central she Dptmrs Glop Ins 1.00 3,5W.00 3,500,00 21000.00 +1000.00 I1. 30 llatilicatim GLM Son 1.06 /,000.00 1,000.00 7,O0.00 2,000.00 12. IO CauVuatim Stating and sLup yen 1.00 CW.00 3W.W I,000.W i,10U,W As-Built Noce 13. 30 Finish and Cloar-Up aide; 5.6 I.W 50:.69 503.69 $W.W SVO.W Ahtatal Schedule " C $41,114.19 AN1 "t-ft Crtr a Rmtm . Deoarlemt o1 Eagcnwing Page 18 Airport 6Rnt/Soot6 PVMter Road Ut Mies 6 ParnnO Contractor Contractor Bic Dale CD VALLEY CENENS Mr. CO RRC CDNSIWCTIBN INC live ban Desncot. n URI! Est. Dalt Bit Unit 114 110• Wo• Wmtitg Price Ascent Pace AMO 6.1% 5sles lax 1;,330.:5 1:19B6.0 Total ScheNle " V 644,444.11 134,861.60 Total ScheoVls "4" SM.67B.9D 6115,359.97 Total Schepls 'Y" 12991999.RE 1377,54 .57 total Rll Scheluln 169 .M.31 IBA,765.11 • r �p.RRrii � w-Ks8 1179E February 24, 1986 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINEE CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION. APPLICANT: FANCHER FLYWAYS, INC. FILE NO. CU-103-85 LOCATION: 243 West Perimeter Road at the Renton Municipal Airport. SUMMARY OF REQUEST. Approval of a Conditional Ise Permit to allow the construction of two aircraft hangar buildings having approximately 6720 sq. ft. and 4500 sq. ft. respectively to house seven aircraf. or, property zoned P-I. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Building and Zoning Department Recommendation: Approval with conditions. Hearing Examiner Decision: Approved with conditions. BUILDING d, ZONING The Building & Zoning Department Report was DEPARTMENT REPORT: received by the Examiner on February 4, 1986. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Building and Zoning Department Report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner cunducred a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on February 11, 1966, at 9:05 A.M. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered Into the record: Exhibit d I - Yellow file containing apoli,:ation, proof of posting and publication and other documents pertinent to this request. Exhibit N2 - Site Plan. Exhibit #3 - For illustrative purposes only. brochure showing full fab 6700 sq. ft. building to be utilized. Exhibit 04 - For illustrative purposes only. brochure by Atlantic showing the proposed 4500 sq ft. building. Presenting a review of the proposal was Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator. He set out such information as the 1.65 acre of property is to be used to add two aircraft hangar buildings t house seven aircraft. Utility plans will have to be approved and improved for the subject area, and the Fire Department noted there will need to be provisions for access to the inside hangar area from West Perimeter Road. Tne water main system to be utilized must provide 3 fire hydrants at locations to be approved by that department. The present hydrants are not properly located and are the property of the Bcaing Company. Mr. Blaylock stated the Building Department Is requestlr a fire wall be provided on the west building near the office. No other buildings are permitted within 40 ft. of these buildings without exterior walls. Approved grading and drainage plans will have to bu approved by the Cily, the proposa! compiles with the criteria to be considered for a Conditional Use, the project is ccmFetible, meets the height and bulk requirements of the zoning classification, is similar ir, function and use, there Is a demand for this use, traffic circulation will not be modified, nose and glare will be no greater than those now at the airport. and landscaping will be moderately provided. Mr. Blaylock continued stating the existing parking lot may not meet City standards for dir+anslons and requirements but the Code does not specifically set out parking requlremen.., for aircraft hangars. Usually in small aircraft operations the owner of the aircraft may park their car under the wing of the aircraft, move the aircraft and then park the car where the aircraft was located. Fancher Flyways. Inc. CU-103-85 February 24. 1986 Page 2 Mr. Blaylock advised it was staff's feeling that this method of parking would be acceptable to the City, and no special parking arrangement need be persued for parking at the hangars. Continuing, Mr. Blaylock referred to a letter from the Public Works Director stating both of the Perimeter Roads are not public streets but are a private access to the airport. This means no setbacks are required on the Perimeter Roads. Public access to the airport is off Rainier Avenue, the adjacent parking lot should be upgraded to meet Ci'y standards, and staff supports the recommendation for approval of this proposal. Calling for testimony from the applicant or their representative, responding was: Bob Mickel 9244 N.E. lath Bellevue. Washington, 98004 Mr. Mickel stated he feels the report presented was adoquate and fair but questioned the requirement of additional fire hydrants by the Fire Department questioning why the additional protection is being required since they are not increasing the number of aircraft or people on the site. The buildings are essentially non-flammable, and if the site is not adequately protected now, he feels it may be the responsibility of the City to upgrade and protect their investment. The applicant is only asking to build hangars for aircraft that are currently using the site. Mr. Blaylock stated he could not address the Fire Department requirements but felt they were based on established City Codes for the construction of new buildings. The Hearing Examiner stated the applicant should work with the Fire Department at the time they obtain the building permit with regard to the additional fire hydrants and the placement of water mains. It was clarified that there would not be landscaping at the rear of the western or northern hangars, and Mr. Mickel stated the existing landscaping in the existing parking lot and the area around the existing office building should prove sufficient to conform with the City requirements. The area north of the existing building Is paved in gravel, the area to the east is a combination of gravel, grass, etc. so there should be no need for further gravel work at this time. The Hearing Examiner called for further testimony, there was no one else wishing to speak in favor of or in opposition to this matter. Wishing to comment on the lease for this property, representing staff was: Vince Lee Public Works Coordinator City of Renton Mr. Lee advised the lease on this property has already been signed and has no conditions attached to it. l he proposal for the development of these hangars was presented to, and approved by the Aviation Committee and the City Council, subject only to the provision that all administrative procedures be followed. This hearing is a part of those procedures. Mr. Lee stated it was the initiative of Fancher Flyways, Inc. to place the hangars on this property, and this development is highly encouraged by the City. If a Conditional Use Permit could not be issued it would only mean that the hangars could not be built at this time. but the lease would not be affected at all. It is felt hangar space Is needed on this area and again. Mr. Lee stated this proposal has the full support of the Aviation Committee and the City. There being no further testimony or comments from staff, the hearing was closed at 9:35 A.M. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS h DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicant, Fancher Flyways, Inc., has requested approval of a Conditional Use Permit to allow the construction of two aircraft hangar buildings at the Renton Municipal Airport. 2. The application file containing the application, the 'stata Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation, the Building and Zoning Denartment Report, and other pertinent documents was entered in the record as Exhibit 41. Fancher Flyways, Inc. CU-105-85 February 24, 1986 Page 3 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environrr.3ntal Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43.21C. 1�71, as amended), a Declaration of Non-Significance has been Issued for the subject proposal by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the responsible official. 4. Plans for the proposal have been revie.ted by all City departments affected by the Impact of this proposal. 5. The subject site is located at the extreme southwest corner of the airport at 243 West Perimeter Road. 6. An existing building and unpaved surface are located at the site. 7. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of public and quasi-public uses, but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the plan. The Airport Plan obviously suggests activities supportive of aviation. a. The subject site is zoned P-1 (Public/Quasi-Public). 9. The applicant proposes constructing two separate hangar buildings. The larger building will be approximately 6,720 square feet, while the smaller building will be approximately 4,500 sq ft. Seven aircraft will be housed in the two facilities. 10. The structures are metal prefabricated buildings. The buildings will be approximately 20 feet high (smaller building) and 13 feet high. 11. The Fire Department has indicated that the current fire flow water supply is not standard. Fire Department approval will be required of all fire flow and hydrant requirements. 12. Building and Zoning recommended parking at the ratio of 1 stall for every 200 feet of office space. Parking for hangars is generally provided by the airplane storage location. 13. The applicant will be paving the unpaved areas of the site. 14. The applicant has secured a lease from the City, and any improvements made to the property are made solely at the applicant's request. They are not required as part of the lease nor was the lease contingent upon the subject proposal. CONCLUSIONS 1. The applicant for a Conditional Use Permit must demonstrate that the request is In the public Interest, will not impair the public health, safety and welfare, and in addition. Is in compliance with the criteria found In Secti_o 4-748(C) which provides in part that: a. 'he proposal generaily conforms with tha Comprehensive Plan- b. There is a general community need for the proposed use at the proposed location: c. There will be no undue Impacts on adjacent property: d. The proposed use Is compatible in scale with the adjacent residential uses, if any; e. Parking will not occur in required side yards and that traffic movement and circulation will be safe; f. Noise. light and glare will not be adverse: 9. Landscaping shall be sufficient to buffer the use: h. Adequate public services are available and will not be burdened by the proposal. The requRste conditional use appears justified and Is approved. Fancher Flyways, Inc. CU-103-95 February 24, 1986 Page 4 2. Many of the criteria for a Conditional Use Permit are not entirely app?icable to a use located at the airport. The airport is a distinct property, and Nhile some Off-site impacts can be anticipated, they are not unusual for an airport location. The proposed use, new hangars, is compatible with the designation of the site as an airport in both the Comprehensive Plan and the Airport Master Plan. The hangars are supportive of aviation. 3. Staff indicated a shortage of hangar space in the general area and the applicant's proposal will help fill the need for additional space. There apparently is a community need which cannot be served at very many locations. 4. The buildings proposed, prefabricated buildings. are generally in scale with other development at the airport. They will not exceed 20 ft. in height. Like many of the existing hangar buildings, they are metal walled ane generally open. 5. There will not be any appreciable Increase In noise, light and Aare as a result of this development. 6. Adequate public services are available and will not be burdened by the proposal, although the water supply for fire suppression will have to be modified to meet the Fire Department requirements. 7. Parking for the office will have to be at the usual ratio of I stall for each 200 feet of office space. DECISION The Conditional Use Permit is approved subject to the following conditions: I. The parking for office uses, if any, will have to be I stall for each 200 square foet of office space. 2. Fire Department requirements for fire flow and hydrant spacing will have to be accomplished. ORDERED THIS 24th day of February, 1986. 1 K AI FREU J.. KA MAN ` HEARING E AMINER 4 TRANSMITTED THIS 24th day of February, 1966 to the parties of record: Bob Mickel 9244 N.E. 13th Bellevue, We. 98004 Vince Lee Public Works Coordinator City of Renton TRANSMIT TED THIS 24th day of February, 1986 to the following: Mayor Barbara V. Shinpoch Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Richard Houghton, Public Works Director Larry M. Springer, Policy Development Director Members, Renton Planning Commission Ronald Nelson. Building h Zoning Director Glen Gordon. Fire Marshal Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Renton Record-Chronicle Fancher Flyways. Inc. CU-103-85 February 24, 1986 Page 5 Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before March 10, 1986. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in Judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV. Section 3016. which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of $75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for Inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parts (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision r--y not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. For purposes of these decisi.3ns and recommendations the terms "Should" and "Shall" are to be considered mandatory. The term "May" will be considered discretionary. When the report is a recommendation to the City Council the terms "should" and "shall" are intended to inform the City Council that If they approve the recommendation the items should be mandatory to preserve the intent of the decision. '• ,....) M.l...J•"7.— ice.►) 1r1•..J�,z T r. I w• I JJtY$ i pv w..+� w..,t rQ wiwa NJ(y foal •,rl.r0 ,•r'•• � •.)ry Kcal i �t U27�Iw la � "7 �)`•`hJ +�r� 'S4 I ''-n'r r+•••. c J• --••.r .sw. _' I L ..r J L_TJ L_� Y•r .ir .w•.r nK �a- ! a4.,.p Jr ." . _ rir.q...•ir., is.Kr..n t rl+a,� .«.ayy.r� All �.ss. Iw.u'wl /N•lir n+n tr.p .iM ir-.,• �..... n.M I jar • f ;I ,•.r...�) �1 :. _ - �} S \�1• M N� •► }1} 7•• I � � 1JJJ�• � k t .CA `, ••�� {jig' 3 . ( �� } r F i �\ { '� M i I• 1 o1,IL _ *` t F i , �2 �.-��'I � �•-l„� L-1 �� {�i:� 'fit �>��i ��F'(3' : is FANCHER FLYWAYS, INC. CU-103-85 APPLICANT FANCHER FLYWAYS. INC, TOTAL AREA + 1.65 ACRES PRINCIPAL ACCESS WEST PERIMETER ROAD VIA AIRPORT WAY EXISTING ZONING P-1,PUBLIC USE EXISTING USE EXISTING OFFICE BUILDING AND AIRCRAFT TIEDOWN AREA PROPOSED USE CONSTRUCTION OF TWO AIRCRAFT HANGER BUILDINGS COMPREhENS►VE LAND USE PLAN_ PUBLIC/QUASI-PUBLIC COMMENTS p 'oft" ENDING OF FILE FILE TITLE to *I& Fl Port - W esE �enme�er lZood (.tlafernwin ngineer ( n9 ate r Projec�