HomeMy WebLinkAboutWTR2701929 W T R-1 �-- C�--r2-=°1 ~`�t`'� _ W-8 6 3 1+
HIGHLANDS SELF-SERVICE STORAGE NE 4TH BETWEEN OROF AVE & UNION AVE
BEGINNING
OF FILE
a
, .
t
t
�d4
1i� Hg i
•. 4MY t a
J t "1<<,. .�i S,'a. aY `�t '��5� � 9 ��"'��"� k " I �� � •ilfty �`
e.-
_� 1 U
y Mir
.4,.. a�'i SAT". 1 :uC,r ,M•-
M R. �3 .�� ,,�� T � ♦yam
:!I Ill III NOW
4, J i to
9 � A
4
a
^4
i
PROJECT mAnAGEOIEIIT RSSOCIRTES
- aaaw D.Fitzowold
r
-- __.. . . •z9d4 SE 401 Caen .[S Eiebirve W4 99006 (204)746-7232
PROJECT IIIRf1RGI0EITT R550CIRTE'
cc d
B
n
I * '
r
'
r.
IG
C'CINNWIL L. lMCL]RPOAAT@L7
l
2
M 1 i I
t s.rcetle tot}iRS�IkT�,!
IMuer Melloeel letgfaate Cempnl
W Aa MIMOTON T1 TIT"D..,aION
Filed Inr Record at Request of
26 9 0o IM a{9 o�•2e 00144 A
9Y THE Divt810N of . CFEE 2.00
To RECORDS "" C10S ECD F 5.00
;IFFICE OF THE. CITY CLTHN KINoCOLINiy RS► L *gS*` '(�
RENTON MUNICIPAL l .
"!NTON INA 98055
VS.. L saw
BILL OF SALE
ILNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That FNP Associates d/b/a Highlands Self-SerVice
Storage DI Rentori
County of Kinq ,Stale of Washington,the patty of the first part.
for and in consideration of the sum of One and 00/100
Doll{n
lawful money of the United States of America,to them In hand paid by the C I ty of Renton
the part y of the second part, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, do by these presents grant.
bargain, sell and deliver unto the said party of the second part, the following described personal property now
located at 3408 N E 4th Street
In the City of Renton , County of King and State of Washington, to-wit:
d' WO-863
qTApproximately 560 lineal feet of 12" Ductile Iron pipe and 10 lineal feet. of 6"
kG Ductile Iron pipe and two (2) each of Fire Hydrant Assemblies, and one (1) 8" Gate
Valve and one (1) 6" Gate Valve and all appurtenances pertaining to said watermain,
expressly warranting said watermain against any expenses, costs or liens hereto
incurred thereon by, through or under seller herein.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the nine to the said part y of Line second -art, Its heirs, executors.
administrators and assigns forever. And mid part y of the first part, for its heirs,
raeeutors, administrators, covenant and agree to and with the mid party of the second part, Its
executors, administrators and assigns, that mid party of the first part is the owner of the said
property,goods and chattels and has good right and lull authority to sel! the mine, and that I t
will warrant and defend the sale hereby made unto the mid party of the second put, its
executors, administrators and assigns, against all and every person or persons, whomsoever, lawfully claiming or to
claim the wait,
IN WITNESS WHEREOF,The said party of the first part he hereunto set its hand
and seal this Eighth 8�•
S (SUL)
i f
_
_(UAL)
STATF OF WASHINGTON,
u.
County of k i y1 q
On this day personally appeared before ,tY }Zc�.orn
to me known to be the Individual f1, described in and who e=ecuA the within and foregoing instrument. acd
acknowledged that h C signed the same as 7 s free and voluntary act and deed, for the
uses and purposes therein mentioned.
CIYEN under my hand and official seal this day of r 19 F9
ONojid PrMic it J ile of Wuhi grog,
r[siding al
( �'9- A 41r 'v" rxv S l0 9a
COST DATA AND INVENTORY
SUBJECT: FMP Associates _ CITY PROJECT NUMBERS: W- 863
Highlands Self-Service Storage S- _
UMEFoKff
TO: CITY OF RENTON FROM: FMP Associates
UTILITIES DIVISION 200 MILL AVE. SO. 10709 Beardslee Blvd M201
RENTON WA 98055
B._hell , WA 98011
DATE: 6/08/89
Per your request, the following information is furnished concerning costs for improve-
ments installed for the above referenced project.
HATER SYSTEM:
Length Size Type
Ductile
Iron
560 L.F. Of 12 Iron WATERMAIN
—T- L.F. OF —�"—�— WATERMAIN
L.F. OF " WATERMAIN
-- L.F. OF WATERMAIN y
— 1 EACH OF in ,—Cl—ow GATE VALVES
1 EACH OF �r .j0=" Clow GATE VALVES
EACH OF " GATE VALVES
Size Type SUBTOTAL $— 8.608.00
1 EACH OF 54" Rennsselaer _ FIRE HYDRANI ASSEMBLIES S 2,775.00
each of M.Iowa
(COST OF :IRE HYDRANTS MUST BE LISTED SEPARATELY).
TOTAL COST FOR WATER SYSTEM S_ 11 383.00
SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM:
Length Size Type
_ L.F. OF SEWER MAIN
L.F. OF " SEWER MAIN
L.F. OF SEWER MAIN
_ EACH OF DIAMETER MANHOLES
TOTAL COST FOR SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM
STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM:
Length Size Type
L.F. OF STORM LINE
L.F. OF STORM LINE
L.F. OF STORM LINE
_ L.F. OF " _ STORM LINE
TOTAL COST FOR STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM
STREET IMPROVEMENTS: (Including Curb, Gutter, Sidewalk)
TOTAL COST FOR STREET IMPROVEMENTS S _.
r
itzge all SIGN URE)
(SIGNATORY :DST BE AUTHORIZED AGENT OR
OWNER OF SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT)
COST DATA AND INVENTORY
SUBJECT: (_ ,)(tG�� �{� CITY PROJECT NUMBERS: W-
S _
70: CITY OF RENTON FROM:
UTILITIES DIVISION -
200 MILL AVE. SO.
RENTON WA 980S5 — --
DATE:
Per your request, the following information is furnished concerning costs for improve-
ments installed for the above referenced project.
WATER SYSTEM:
Length Size Type
_ L.F. OF _ WATERMAIN
L.F. OF _ WATERMAIN 1
L.F. OF __ WATERMAIN "«a� � � a, .SOI�•�z
L.F. OF WATERMAIN
EACH OF _ "___ GATE VALVES
EACH OF GATE VALVES
EACH OF GATE VALVES
Size Type SUBTOTAL E
EACH OF FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLIES $
(COST OF FIRE HYDRANTS MUST BE LISTED SEPARATELY).
TOTAL COST FOR WATER SYSTEM $
SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM:
Length Size Type
L.F. OF SEWER MAIN
L.F. OF _ _ SEWER MAIN
L.F. OF SEWER MAIN
^_ EACH OF _— Fi A—m—ET9 MANHOLES
TOTAL COST FOR SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM S
STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM:
Length Size Type
l .F. OF STORM LINE
L.F. OF STORM LINE
_ L.F. OF STORM LINE
L.F. OF STORM LINE
TOTAL COST FOR STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM E
STREET IMPROVEMENTS: (Including Curb, Gutter, Sidewalk)
TOTAL COST FOR STREET IMPROVEMENTS $
IGN U
(SIGNATORY MUST BE AUTHORIZED AGENT OR
OWNER OF SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT)
I&FOR RECORD AT REQUEST 01
OFOCE OF THE CITY CLERK
RENTON MUNICIPAL BLUfi.
'00 MILL AVE. SO. UTILITIES /1
'rNTON,INA 98055
R A [ [ N R N T 89•'Oi•'26 4)0146 R
RECFEE 2.00
RECD F 6.00
CASH5L ****8.00
QQ 35
THIS INSTRUMENT, made this 1 day of __, 1987.;
by and between ASuO, and
and
and i
and 1
hereinafter called "Crantor(s)", and the.CITY OF RENTON, a Municipal,fm WCorpocation of King County, Washington, hereinafter called "Grantee" 'a ,
WITNESSETR: G4�m
�ti3O CD
That said Crantoc(s), for and in consideration of the su$':et
4
S/. '
-c.-i
paid by Grantee, and other valuable consideration do by these present,*, ,
grant, bargain, sell, convey, and warrant unto the said Craatee, its "'w
successors and assigns, an easement for public utilities (including water
tz and sewer) with necessary appurtenances over, through, across and upon the
le following described property in Xing County, Washington, more particularly
0 described as follows
0
MA portion of the following de.cribad property*
The Southwest quarter of the 'outhwest quarter of the Southeast quarter
of Section 9, Township 23 Nor h , Range 5 East , W.N. , in King County,
Washingtonj
EXCEPT the East one acre thereofj an,;
EXCEPT the South 430.00 feet of the East 200.00 feat of that portion
thereof lying West of said East one acrel and
EXCEPT the North 125.00 feet of the South 280.00 feet of the West
155.00 foot thereofj and
EXCEPT the West 30.00 feet thtreofj and
EXCEPT the South 30.00 feet thereof for road] and
EXCEPT that portion thereof as deeded to the City of Renton under
Recordinq Number 610E010654.
BEGINNING at the Southeast corner thereof; thence N 0*131170 W alonq
the East line thereof 340.00 feetj thence S R96461430 W 1RR.00 featj
thence N 0* 131170 W parallel with the West line choreof 12.00 feat ]
thence S 89*461430 W 12.00 feat to the West line thereofj thence
S 0' 13117" E along said West line 27. 00 teetj thence N 69*46143• E
I85.00 feet , tnunce S 0613 , 17" E parallel with the East boundary
thereof 325. 00 feet to the South line thereof; thence S 69'06102" E
along said South line 15.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
Said easement being 15. 00 feet in width.
Page ) of 2
Said heretofore mentioned grantee, its successors or assigns, shall
have the right, without prior notice or proceeding at law, at such times as
may be necessary to enter upon said above described property for the purpose
of constructing, maintaining, repairing, altering or reconstructing said
utility, or making any connections therewith, without incurring any legal
obligations or liability therefore, provided, that such construction, main-
taining, repairing, altering or reconstruction of such utility shall be
accomplished in such a manner that the prtvate inprovements existing in the right
right(s)-of-way shall not be disturbed or damaged, or in the event they are
disturbed or damaged, they will be replaced in as good a condition as they were
immediately before the property was entered upon by the Grantee.
The Grantor shall fully use, and enjoy .he aforedescribed premises,
including the right to rEtain the right to use the surface of said right-of-way
if such use does not interfere with installation and maintenance of the utility
line. However, the grantor shall not erect buildings or structures over, under J
or across the right-of-way during the existence of such utility.
if
This easement, shall be a covenant running with the land and shall be bind-
ing on the Grantor, his successors, heirs and assigns. Grantors covenant that
Vim'+ they ..a the lawful owners of the above properties and that they have a good and
4W lawful right to execute this agreenert.
and
and
and
CORPORATE FOR14:
STATE OF l.a� �r`o^� ) SS
COUNTY OF ���yg_ )
On this (l/J day of ) in before me, the undersigned,
a Notary Publ cc in an for the tate oV1 duly commissioned and sworn
personally appeared 6'D.P,7' -)& dl d
to me known to be the respectively,
of C/rii' the corporation that executed the fore-
going instrument, and—Jknowle ged the instrww nt to be the free and voluntary
act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and
on oath stated that `e. authorizod to execute the said instrument and that
the seal affixed is 5e corporate seal of said corporation.
WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year in this
certificate above written.
i
otary Public to ae17 for th�tc of
residing a
UE#1-2b
RE 7DRDIhG RE[IIRN TOW
ity of Renton/Dept. Pub. Wks. UTII ffIFS /1
00 200 Mill Ave. so., 4th floor E A S E M E N T
Renton, We 98035 — — 87f1F '09 +nt)f•! 'Ca
(Utility Eng.) W 963 RECD r 6.Of)
9111S INSTIAMENP, made this 3rd day of November CASM'SL.
by aid between Cedar Park Partners Ltd. ,
a California Limited Partnership and
t% -- and
rl and
hereinafter called tlGrantor(s)", and the CIV OF RENTON, a Municipal Corporation of KLg
County, Washington, hereinafter called "Grantee".
V1 W11MARP H: ,
That said Grantor(s), for and in consideration of the stem rf $ 10.00
(Ten collard paid by Grantee, and other valuable consideration, do by
these presents, grant, bargain, sell, convey, and warrant unto the said Grantee, its
successors and assigns, an easement for public utilities (including water and sewer)
with necessary appurtenances over, through, across and upon the following described property
in King County, Wast:Lgton, sore particularly described as follows:
The Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of the Southeast quarter
of Section 9, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in King County, Washington;
EX(F1'1' the East one acre thereof; and
_y EXCEPT the South 430.00 feet of the East 200.00 feet of that portion thereof
lying West of said East one acre; and
EXCEPT the North 125.00 feet of the South 280.00 feet or' the West 155.00 feet
thereof; and
EXCEPT the West 30.00 feet thereof; and
T
"' a* EXCEPT the South 30.00 feet thereof for road; and
0
J W
L " EXCEPT that portion thereof as deeded to the City of Renton under recording
saber 8106010654.
In consideration of mutual benefits to be derived by the eremise of the rights hemL,
granted do by these presents grant, bargain, sell, convey and confirm unto said Grantee
right of easement for emergency access and underground utility, across and upon a strip
of land 24.00 feet in width end having 12.00 feet of such width on each aide of the line
described as follows:
CLX44SNCINO at the Southwest cornier of uald Southwest quarter of the Southwest
quarter of the SouLhwast quarter thence S 890 061 02" E along the South line
of said subdivision 395.82 feet to the West line of the East 200.00 feet of
oatd subdivision lying West of the East one acm; thence N 00 131 17" W along
said line 359.00 feet to the 1101NT OF fY?GINNING of said line, thence N 890 46,
43" W 31.00 feet more or leas to the ten drius of said line and easemnt on the
Easterly boundary of an existlig energency access easement.
IN WITNISS WI1ERfUP-, said Grantors have executed this instrumeant the day and
year first above written.
CEDAR RAPE PAR1'N •' LTD. , A California Limited Partnership
GERA MONO, iNC. , a California Corporation, General 8artner
Gerald Raymond, President
SUSAN E. WIC3IERS
CORPORATE OFF;M WMI
TAX NOT REOUIRED PUCFr SOUND BANK
Itbq co./„scads oih��, ,
>�
Y' ZSai heretofore mentioned heretofo mentioned Grantee, its successors or assigns, shall have the
r1glht, without prior notice or proceeding at law, at such times as may be necessary
to enter upon said above described property for the purpose of constructing, maintaining,
repairing, altering or reconstructing said utilities, or making any connections
therewith, without incurring any legal obligations or liability therefore, provided, that
such construction, malntalrling, repairing, altering or reconstruction of said utilities
shall be accomplished in such a manner that the private improvements existing in the
right(s)-of-way shall rot be disturbed or damaged, they will be replaced in as good a
Condition as they were irmlediately before the property was entered upon by the Grantee.
The Grantor stall fully use and enjoy the aforedescrlbed premises, including the
right to retain the right to use the surface of said right-of-way if such use does net
interfere with installation and maintenance of the utilities. However, the Grantor
shall not erect buildings or structures over, under or across the right-of-day durirg
thA existence of such utilities.
This easement, ahall be a covenant rthruring with the !arid and shall be bLaillg on
tt- the urarrtor, his successors, heirs aid assigia. Grantors covenant that they are the
lawful owners of the above properties and that they have a good tud lawful right to
execute thiZ'L'PAR
C LTD. , a California Limited Partnerahlo
by: GE MOND, Inc. , A California Corporation, General Partner
I
—
Gera L. Raymond, Presi ant —
and 1 0
in
_ rn
and
W
_ C
STATE OF CALIFORNIA aa.
COUNTYOF_--.—Or&ng& _
a on.._ Move�Dor 3, 1987 .belo,e Cos,the eMenlap e,a NoNry evidk in end lo.
Gerald L. Raymond v raaaNiwa«awl.er.roaaras�—.. Y _— gton, hereby
ly appeared
Dareosaev.nownblila la pDeadroma onlM aHN ai sea• op=
—�
u EAL
r, iactm WNNncelloM the peraoMel whose nemelal la/MaWMRHecrlped to ipe wlhm lnelrumenl endachnowledged to ma eNlAUFORNIAIlelapenheyexecutedlllesame jggpwrQ
N }-
m WITNESS my n d and onmlei seal
�(s) describes
Signal _ (Inn,area to,milkier nWa1Ml seep
or sine 6. 8iiith dc3d for the
uses and purposes therein mentioned.
1 STATE OF`,VASHINGTON.
County of /
I certify that I know or ha Is a evidem. that .Susan E 4J�'r/trtl
i j authoriz to execute the instrument and acknowledged
signed thisinatrwnenl, oath eta then of % _ f.
it as the [CO P� OZ-1 (iflq[
to be the tree an v try act of such party fot the uses and purposes entioned in this instrument.
Iy e
Fated:
Notary Publu in end in the State of W shington.
residing at 151/7//6 .
.1}.._..... My appointment expires
A'iWA Jol10.eVNI'.\TI\
. RE'':QtDIhG KM
10 y
ty of Renton/Dept. Pub. Wks. UTILITIES 01
200 Mill Ave. So., 4th floor E A S E M E N T
Renton, We 98055 — — — 8''1crOq *0617 t4
(Utility Eng.) W 863 RECO F 6.00
TM INSTR -Iff, made this 3rd day of November CNSHSL *** !
by and between Cedar Park Partners Ltd. , and
a Californi, Limited Partnership and
N -- and
ana
hereinafter called "Grantor(s)", and the MY OF RENTO 1, a Municipal Corporation of King
County, Washington, hereinafter called "Grantee".
N
� WI1NrS.E1H:
That said Grantor(s), for and In consideration of the arm of $ 10.00
Lj= dollars) paid by Grantee, and other valuable consideration, do by
these presents, grant, bargain, sell, convey, and warrant unto the said Grantee, its
successors and assigns, an easement for public utilities (including water and sewer)
with necessary appurtenances over, through, across and upon the following described property
In King Canty, Washington, more particularly described as follows:
The Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of the Southeast quarter
of Section 9, Township 23 North, Mange 5 East, W.M., in King County, Washington;
EXCEPT the East one acre thereof; and
t EXCEPT the South 430.00 feet of the East 200.00 feet of that portion thereof
lytrg West of said East one acre; and
EXCEPr the North 125.00 feet of the South 280.00 feet of the West 155.00 feet
�.
thereof; and
EXCEPT the West 30.00 feet thereof; and
iv s.• EXCEPT the South 30.00 feet thereof for road; and
P
z EXCEPT that portion thereof as deeded to the City of Renton under renorxiing
nxinber B106010654.
In conslderatim of mutual benefits to be derived by the exercise of the rights herein
grrnted do by these presents grant, bargain, sell, convey and confirm unto said Grantee
rigP.t of easeu.nt for emergency access and ondergXVVd utility, across and upo, a strip
of lard 24.00 feet In width and having 12.00 feet of such width on each side of the 1]--re
described as follows:
COMMENCING at the Southwest connr or uald Southwest quarter of the Suuthwest
quarter of the Scutheast quarter thence S 890 06, 02" E alorg the South line
of said subdivision 395.82 feet to the West line of the Fast 200.00 feet of
said subdivision lying West of the East one acre; thence N 00 13' 17" W along
said line 359.00 feet to the POINT OF EEGINNING of said line; thence N 890 46,
43" W 31.00 feet more or less to the terminus of said line and easement on the
Easterly boundary of an existing emergency access easement.
1N WIMM WIEREOF, said Grantors have executed tills instrument the day and
year first above written..
CEDAR PARTN ' LTD. , A California Limited Partnershio
GERA I90ND, INC. , a California Corporation, General Partner
'Gerald Raymond, President
SUSAN E. WICNERS
CORPORATE OFFER WIT"
EXCISE TA" NOT PEGUIPED PUGEr SOUND BAM
V",;Co.aacodsDivw1
n r v 11�......, Daouly
Said heretofore mentioned Gr-.NTtee, its successors or assigns, shall have the
right, without prior notl^e or proceeding at law, at such times as may be necessary
to enter upon said above described property for the purpose of constructing, malntalnirig,
repairing, altering or reconstructing Gatti utilities, or making any connections
therewlth, without incurring any legal obligations or liability therefore, provided, that
such construction, maintaining, repairing, altering or reconstruction of said utilities
shall be accomplished in such a manner that the private Snprovements existing in the
rlght(s)-of-way, slhall not be disturbed or damaged, they will be replaced in as good a
condition as they were Immediately before the property was entered upon by the Grantee.
The Grantor shall fully use and enjoy the aforedescribed premises, Including the
right to retain the right to use the surface of Bald right-of-wady If such use does not
Interfere with Installation and maintenance of the utilities. however, the Grantor
stall not erect buildings or structures over, under or across the right-of-way during
the existence of such utilities.
This easement, Shall be a covenant Suriname with the la-sd area, rhall be bLki zg an
the Grantor, his successors, heirs Grid assigns. Grantors covenant that they art, the -
lawful owners of the above properties and that they have a good and lawful right to
execute this
��6C PAR t LTD. , a California Limited Partnership
y: CF L AYMOND, Inc. , A California Corporation, General Partner
and
rl Ge!a L. Raymond, President �rT
(` and --
and x'
and
V
ys �
C 1M
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF Orange
On November 3, 1987 befor.m..the undentpnea a Notary Puoao W and he '
-• said State,Parliament,appeared_.__Gerald L. Raymond I
igton, hereby
ty appeared
u. UersolgNy krmyal to lM la played to me as may kale of satin
factory evdarceltobe tnepersoMslwhose nemgsl p/are sub OFFICIAL SEAL
e LORRAINE D SMITH
scribed to the within Instrument and acknowledged tome that NOTArrf PUBLIC-GAGFGRNIA
he/she/they executed the same.
` ORAIIGE CUUImf
My Comm. expires AUG 20 19900
Isa WITNESS my hand and ofticial seal.
! Q[.tfi t ` al(e) described
SignatdrpJ_pyt h7A`'� ITms area for official material seen
or aims D. Smith
Seed for the
uses and purposes therein mentlonaxl.
1
t
STATE OF WASHINGT(IN,
ss.
/. g 1
Ccunty of /(/i✓ �
I certify that I know ur ha¢e-s;6fisle?Vhry,,evidenee that
signed this instrument,otfoath statte�d,, that Vtr c J authori to execute the:netru ent a d acknowledged
it as the C'o,e�,a/e ofhrx,e. C of 1tgel �.fx-a xrrC- Cw�-
to be the free an v untary act of such party fOr the uses and purposes rf(entioned in this instrument.
lhated: /> '</47)
- Notary Public in anrf for tAd State of N'dsAinptan,
residing at t�lt�G
+-..... My appointment expires ..5_/O-dy`%
n anal aFtreaaeNrnnct.
SCHEDULE B
I. The following are the rtquirements to be r,,mplied with:
A. Instruments necessary to create the estate or interest to be insured
must be properly executed, delivered and duly filed for record.
B. Any document to be executed by the herein named partnership must be
executed in accordance with the partnership agreement.
Partnersh p : HILL TOP ASSOCIATES
A copy of any amendments to the above mentioned agreement should be sub-
mitted for examination and file.
C. Any document to be executed by the herein named partnership must be
executed in accordance with the partnership agreement.
Partnership GdA DEVELOPERS, A GENERAL PARTNERSHIP, A PARTNER OF
HILLTOP ASSOCIATES
A copy of any amendments to the above mentioned agreement should be sub-
mitted for examination and file.
D. The proposed mortgaqe must be authorized by resolution of the direc-
tors of the herein named corporation and a certified copy submitted.
Corporation CONNWI' L INCORPORATED, A WASHINGTON CORPORATION, A
PARTNER OF HILL TOP ASSOCIATES
E. Any easement to be executed by the herein named partnership must be
executed in accordance with the partnership agreement.
Partnership CEDAR PARK PARTNERS LTD., A CALIFORNIA LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP
A copy of the agr•ement and any amendments thereto should be submitted
for our examination and file.
II. Schedule B of the policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions
to the following matters unless the same are disposed of to the satisfac-
tion of the company:
SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS:
1. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any,
created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to
the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proprsed insured
acquires for value of record the estate or interest or mortgage thereon
covered by this commitment.
A-368849 PAGE 3
CITY OF RENTON
e R
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Daniel Kellogg - David M. Dean-Mark E. Barber -Zanetta L. Forties-Theodore R. Pa•ry
Assistant City Attorneys
November 6, 1986
TO: Ron Olsen, Utility Engineering
FROM: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
RE: Easement for Waterline - Highlands Self Service Storage
Dear Rent
The easement as provided to me is approved as to legal form.
You inquire as to whether or not the easement for emergency
access and underground utility contain in the middle of the
easement form is permanent. Gen, illy, a grant of an easement
is permanent unless the term of the easement is limited.
There is no limitation on the term of this easement. Additionally,
on the next page is contained language that the easement shonld
be a covenant running with the land and binding on the grantor,
his successors, heirs and assigns. That language would also
indicate permanence.
If you have any other questions, please let me know.
awrence)J. Warren
LJW:nd
cc: Mayor
NOV 6 1986
Post Office Box 626 - 100 S 2nd Street - Renton, Washington 98057 - (206) 255-8678
OF R,6�
�•y z PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
DESIGN/UTILITY ENGINEERING 0 235-2631
Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200MILLAVE.SO. MENTON,WASH.98P55
O �
9$�,rEO SEP1t0'6'P�.
EAREIARA Y. SHINPOCH
MAYOR November 5, 1986
MEMORANDUM
TO: Larry Marren, City Attorney
FROM: Ronald L. Olsen, Utility Engineering
SUBJECT: Easement for Waterline W-863
Highlands Self Service Storage
We seek your legal approval of the attached easement, particularly in the area
highlighted In yellow, pertaining to the emergency access and utility easement.
It is imperative the easement for ingress, egress, and for the waterline hold
permanent status.
Please let me know at your earliest convenience if this easement is
satisfactory in Its verbage. Thank you.
Ronald L. Olsen
2H.02.08-AMH:ckd
Attachment
BUILDING DIVISION
PRE-OCCUPANCY INSPECTION REPORT
DATE: JULY
TO: I—I DESIGN ENGINEERING DIVISION1_I BUILDING FINAL
IIZI UTILITY iNGINEERING DIVISION FIRE DEPARTMENT
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION �_� LANDSCAPE/ZONING
FROM: BUILDING DIVISION
SUBJECT: HILLTOP ASSOCIAT S PERMIT NO B-1J 089 6 B-136_1 __
_ 3408 N.E. 4TH STREET TYPE BUSINESS ELF RAG
The subject project is nearing completion. Please investigate your area
of responsibility and indicate below either your acceptance or
corrections necessary by JULY 14, 198 9 in order that a Certificate of Occupancy may be issued. If no comments are received by the above date,
the Certificate will be issued.
TO: BUILDING DIVISION DATE 7- AO-8?
FROM•_ �,
This projec is approved by this department subject to the following
corrections:
UT111T1 E CIMC-^ UG
PRE-OCM-ANCV' INSPECTION REPORT
REQUIRE: W- WATER S- SEWER
BILL OF SALE.. _
EASEMENT —
INVENTORY
O/p'
AMLT PLANS
D�U}kgTfhA�E;DN{�yEQWLUH TO ISSUARCE-OF TEMPORARY CERT F ATE OF
I_IYES I!'11NO
FORM p5-002 4✓
N0 Ob�E[�w"
t0 IFtir.PL t ature
OCG.�it*�Iy �
�- CITY OF RENTON
BUILDING DIVISION
Earl Clymer, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Building Official
June 13, 1989 f
FMP Associates
10709 Beardslee Blvd. Suite 201
Bothell, WA 98011
RE: JOB ADDRESS - 3408 N.E. 4TH STREET
Gentlemen:
The following items must be corrected or completed and approved before :his building
can be issued a permanent Certificate of Occupancy.
1. Fire Department (235-2642)
a. Fire lane identification "no parking" on east side of east access.
2. Utilities Engineering Div' on (235-2631)
a. BiBvP'sale, ta�rfd-invexwry..ac-well uwd
teww
b. Rewaie uired.nu-asaen+ent. - ..
C. t-resWeren't-- —' M Me {
c )
3. Design Engineering Division (235-2631)
a. Install
b. to"tan np2dino.k-at-Duet-i+M e. .
C. Submit back-rrownsr-re pr-Bpeµk-fbrflh -PrME T i n line and
plug all test eac-In
d. Jnstall-bali�for-6`-swiag'ch.0 -79t7e-hrt+9ult.
e. Raisa--ua wat-top�s}ve-inparle' r
valve aeli+tg:--
f. lacs�pwpT2Ra1. out 15 X.
9
h.
i.
4. Building Division (235-2540)
a. Monitor for sprinkler system not approved.
200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (2%) 235.25Q
BUILDING DIVISION W� �03
PRE-OCCUPANCY INSPECTION REPORT
DATE: 5116189
TO: I±,1 DESIGN ENGINEERING DIVISION 1_� BUILDING FINAL
I-VI UTILITY ENGINEERING DIVISION 1_1 FIRE DEPARTMENT
1_1 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DII�TSION LANDSCAPE/ZONING
FROM: BUILDING DIVISION
SUBJECT: HIKHLAW SELL S�_Wf4l PERMIT NO _�3 - 13()89 / - 1;6l3
'540�- ME 4` 5s - TYPE BUSINESS �IEI� S I �C s-
The subject project is nearing completion. Please investigate your area
responsibility and indicate below either your acceptance or corrections
necessary by in order that a Certificate of Occupa
may be issued. If no comments are received by the above date, the
Certificate will be issued.
TO: BUILDING DIVISION f DATE S 16 89
FROM: A'5DOU1, GA'�oua, / xwSi- INsPEmy
This project is approved by this department subject to the following
corrections: p d
IustnQ Untie /nu✓ exrenYiaN 4er I7yhaAV Unl, ee nV ME.A* 5t-Z(2) Ins�dQ �nAle({'C
p�
dy, PMYIntifu(fe✓ Vnlde._fr2 $uE6mis, Y 6�ck4la+ 1WrYpovi- A� _b1jCVA 4y ...ryty pn.Vtrhou
e and okuA aU ,W tAc& 4 '01intatt Wt (Ir draw 11% SW-in th((L ljalV<-
�eo
t k'W dkic we !,( Wey *40 vntve, it tmrlul'% GeV wmy(4 itiYe
�" � " r
arul (mn ✓ Valves dew t4%'�,n.. 4 l 1MWq,CI. _DCUA iw irricahrn sysr°(n lo,'64n,
(-.'I / , ,° ��n.D J
/Sa n��(U If.W6L.. CQaan-e4� bub . 8� �(1vb hC�'Vtl 01nhnIV nnl'(h dV 'Id PD1M� Unl�
s°° (`�1S4hwi� /1u I�t(fbh u''1I(hl Tr"�ry/ tA✓ m�,lOwin� d1�-I�a1--c+�. 4... •-.�_A Y r..hQ
--(
_ b� AS bulY dart Irr{ r(I(ir .nac�evt lr nlI ;mp wr. ads do y�Yc eij'i
c A 46, appli(thaw warW Awls/ fie/ Y.— O((Y(+N Inc I d) -0VrA v 4v✓ way""Mehl rdYr,��eU
DO YOU HAVE ANY OBJECTION TO ISSUANCE OF TEMPORARY CERTIFICATE OF
OCCUPANCY. ��/A�
1_1YES- I�{'NO
FORM p5-002 /
C G : 'R�i E1clla - BI4 %� ✓ Auttor zed S gna e
Ails. Kwe- 1&.. fr,� d> j0rK Boer knu.U(
hL W. 993 4 000 >0
BUILDING DIVISION W 3 63
PRE-OCCUPANCY INSPECTION REPORT
_ DATE: 7 ' 16/8c,
TO: DESIGN ENGINEERING DIVISION _I BUILDING FINAL
UTILITY ENGINEERING DIVISION ;_� FIRE DEPARTMENT
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION I_� LANDSCAPE/ZONING
FROM: BUILDING DIVISION
SUBJECT: H1 KHlAW PERMIT NO �L" 13
3408— WE TYPE BUSINESS /<I� SOU(aqe ' hU C1i1Ags
T
The subject project is nearing completion. Please investigate your area
responsibility and indicate below either your acceptance or corrections
necessary by in order that a Certificate of Occupa
may be issued. If no comments are received by the above date, the
Certificate will be issued.
TO: BUILDING -5
DIVISION 1 / DF.TE /16/ �q
FROM: AWOU1, GA•Cbug, / (BMSI• �W%QE Le
I
This project is approved by this department subject to the following
corrections: + � a
+a, OI lnstad 0011e /nu✓ exten5new ly 6d✓aak o,0 aV NE , l`l In IW �nA loch
� S�
d�Via+i+c+Aa✓ Vatup'. /`
3�—' �►1 Y< op r'1' or 1JDtVA ✓ Q�r. Dr+VteAiox
I f T �y
..AA01 I.0 A aU AIf✓ Rn 'Ind 64 +Ire cAealy N 6.a Jwintj eltccl Jalgs
1rt �au1V 'KauSc Ua�le wo ``Wey-tqo Valre in Dnr�n AV wmyrL Si Ye:
and tcnYw q0k bew (''11SY10 J IIKt4'. _D(UA Arncahsn sKsc_e.,—A IasYi�i
� t :o.
/SnnrltU( (.Qpnn-e4v bou 7. �o/ '�cRvY sc�fir� 0)phnlV Dnl'ch aV -tannin. Un1YL J
aa^ A�it' Al) Ilrnbn ti+t4 �. ilcwkn ats.P#, nnA /ne✓-AnMa inJt h�y
Sw * unk✓owo a ltns n �bl 9�S ke1—t a,s rnh rd�r w CA ms,r toads an pre 1 d 6t
VIM,-e�MAe1y�(tSUraVtea uh>�V tw/ i-ntaY rtd dine �d� tait,n(0V 41n►t✓1Aa4,) naYlag;e)J
7
tot/ DO YOU HAVE ANY OBJECTION TO ISSUANCE OF TEMPORARY CERTIFICATE OF
-"IV OCCUPANCY. ,}-�,�t
1_IYES' I /�NO
FORM p5-002
: 'Zl m.) Of1\1a- 13i d It Y' Aut or�d SignaLu
Ct �((pfa Itrv' yU- � tfrfbr/ IOTK f4ui' "Luui
hh ui st 5 4 1,7()() x 15070 - ���
��+Y\I+WV VL V1S1V1\
PRE-OCCUPANCY INSPECTION REPORT
DATE:— May 8 1989
TO: I_I DESIGN ENGINEERING DIVISION I_I BUILDING FINAL
112 UTILITY ENGINEERING DIVISION I_I FIRE DEPARTMENT
I_1 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION I_I LANDSCAPE/ZONING
FROM: BUILDING DIVISION
SUBJECT:__FSILLTOP ASSOCIATES �PERMIT NO
_'408 N E 41H STR_U.T TYPE BUSINESS LF STO arr �.cT FLR•
ALL 9UILDINGc
The subject project is nearing Completion. Please investigate
Your area
responsibility and indicate b w lo either your acceptance or corrections
necessary by ]�y/2� Zt
may be issued , d P�_in order that a Certificate Of Occupanc
. If O c mments are received by the above date, the
Certificate will be issued.
TO: BUILDIN1�GG� D;�I.VISION
G DATE e f
FROM:
This project
corrections: is approved by this department subject to the following
UTILITY ENGINEERING
PRE-0CCUp.u'v ' i i
REQUIRE:
OK
a INVENTORY
j AHUILT PUINu^_
A".WUr,14a
(�, UBIECT TO RELD IIiS?E ,n,QY_ hAGd ---
DO YOU HAVE ANY OBJECTION TO ISSUANCE OFF/TEMPORARY CERTIFICATE OF
OCCUPANCY.
i_I YES I:PI'NO
FORM P5-002
Au't�h��oorrGGiz+�xxXXXf� ed Sllgnattu/r�fL
PRE-OCCUPANCY INSPECTION REPORT
DATE: DECEM.._d 16. 198%
TO: DESIGN ENGINEERING DIVISION _ BUILDING FINAL
5/8N by Qh1S rn(JAr7 Si�V•Q ��. 32B 5gQ6Z - -3>&J
6" W(c) l7MVA . N.oq(t. 766 Yb _ SA,,,( Ik,
� r
�4 ftov 'D(o • In,), ha1Et SOSY - Sr Nv S '� II g
� IK3Sl�n ' �al►` t�$$
■
/1
7
FROM: Ay)r*V (lA(out_ 6"g INSt[ffnR
This project is approved. by this department subject to the following
co• rections:
Qd,i fa&
/C'�) � �� n�'a,r,�
-fft
AqF
�p _i.tclylr n9� er�'1'i— -3�m�t'--.t+1� �yeOaihV
f zoeo i� 1esYa��F ert�aL
# 50o bn,l to '1�m�7w u��l�S '►7t� a) 6;V oi4 Sa� wnrw .•o '�
b Cosy dnr. in4(eln S'Mf,i' � c1 GS bwN vlom
�,O icck 'reel' renu.V Aer _DCVA e) A+•+eVw .,JUrnho*,Ax h, .o
'101Ao •Boni-�t,ou«;. # 10, 6s0
DO YOU HAVE ANY O&TECTION TO ISSUANCE OF TEMPORARY CERTIFICATE OF
OCCUPANCY. No
ES (' Au<ss+ohYManV �_�NO
1.AI4 kb navin� n,✓4mw�r� j4ut
FORM p5-00 I 1 D�]
"Vim Mduvi- %W P(Fy Authorized SigbAture
Arkew N°�'ti• U�Lh, P��r dry
Fide w• I e� P
PRE JCCUPANCY INSPECTION REPORT u�n�
DATE: DECEML_A 16, 1988
TO: I—� DEIIGN ENGINEERING DIVISION 1—1 BUILDING FINAL
1:2r UTILITY ENGINEERING DIVISION I_I FIRE DEPARTMENT
1-1 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION —1 LANDSCAPE/ZONING
FROM: BUILDING DIVISION
SUBJECT: HIGHLAND SELF STORAGFPERMIT NO - 8
_,3408 N.E. 4TH STREET TYPE BUSINESS
The sub= .ct project is nearing completion. Please investigate your area
responsibility and indicate below either your acceptance or corrections
necessary by _DECEMBER 23. 1988 in order that a Certificate Of Occupa
may be issued. If no comments are received by the above date, the
Certificate will be issued.
TO: BUILDING DIVISION DATE 0
FROM: .t4�144A
This proje�t is approved by this department subject to the following
corrections:
urILI'Ph aNGINEERN
pR;; 0GC-,,°° " F[ZQTIQN REPORT
rc. i SU3 VMTFR S---. SEWER
UILL 0F AI F
CASEMENT
�2 COST CATA 3 ' - a.a.1
A6 BUILT
Y kkAZ , 0 17 nv DDGV
SLWECTTO FIELD INSPE00%, OY --
DO YOU HAVE ANY OBJECTION '10 ISSUANCE OF TEMPORARY CERTIFICATE OF
OCCUPANCY.
�_1YES 1_1ND
FORM p5-002
Authorized S gnatu
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
BUILDING DIVISION
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
PFRMIT
APPLICATION ONLY — UNTIL VALIDATED NUMBER
Owner Location of Work
Address
INSPECTIONS FEES
CONSTRUCTION Site Sewer
Storm Sewer
PERMIT Right-of-Way Construction _
Sp. Utility Conn. Fee - Water
Water Latecomer Fees
(Public Right-of-Way) Water Insp./Approval Fees
Sp. Utility Conn. Fees - Sewer
Sewer Latecomer Fees
Sewer Insp./Approval Fees
Date issued Inspection Fees
Special Deposit - CASH BOND
Expiration Date TOTAL FEE.
Description of Work
ano Number of Feet
Contractor Business
License
Address Bond
Telephone
IT IS UNDERSTOOD THAT THE CITY OF RENTON SHALL BE HELD HARMLESS OF ANY AND ALL
LIABILITY, DAMAGE OR INJURY ARISING FROM THE PERFORMANCE OF SAID WORK.
ANY WORK PERFORMEL WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY OR ON SEWER MAIN MUST BE DONE BY A
LICENSED, ..ONDED CONTRACTOR. LOCATE UTILITIES BEFORE EXCAVATING..
CALL 235-2631 FOR INSPECTION.
Call between 8 AM and 9 AM for APPLICANT % �%�!
inspection in afternoon: call
before 12 Noon the day before
for inspection in morning. PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
SPECIFY TIME FOR INSPECTION.
" C
CALL 235-2620 for street signs CALL BEFORE YOU DiG BY
48-HOUR LOCATORS
and lighting. 1-800-424-5555
City of Benton Engineering Department
235-2631
PRECONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE
DATE: Wednesday, June 22, 1988
TIME: 10:00 a.m.
PLACE: Lth Floor Conference Room
DEVELOPER / CONTRACTOR OR SUBCONTRACTOR / NAME OF PROJECT
Name: Ron Fitzgerald / Mosbrucker Contractor
746-7232 or 481-9495
Phone: 953-3200 255-4688 Chuck Black, Foreman - Job Site
Project: Ni hland Sal!-Service Stora e
torm Water Improvements and waterline Improvements
Proj. N: _
NAME OF APPOINTED INSPECTOR J
Please check Cepartments to be notified and specify person to attend, r
i
✓k Design/Utility Enq.
x Fire Dept.
X Police Dept.
X _ Street Dept. (,
X Traffic Dept.
_x Sewer Maintenance
x_ Water Shop
Park Dept.
Building Dept.
Other
Outside Depts.
Contractor to Notify_ Department of Transportation
Outside Depts.
X Pacific N.W. Bell Company
X Puget Sound Power 3 Light Company
X TCI Seattle, Inc. (Cable Co.)
X Washington Natural Gas Company
Other
AUTHORIZATION OF SPECIAL BILLING
/ DATE: � �-as
PROJECT NAME:
PROJECT NUMBER:
WORK ORDER NO. _
It is the intent of this letter to authorize the City of Renton to bill the dndersigned for all costs
incurred relative to the above-referenced project, by the City o/f�Renton for
the following work:
BILLING TO BE SENT TO:
Name:
Address: 37�'0?1 — 1x'-5 4!�V ,C:- 1�5_
AtUx
r—_
r.r
94S3 - 3 a v v
Owner/ eloper, Contractor or
Authorized Agent
/��(1J�`/Jf/�'
' �����
�P � �/ ���
�-'� -�'✓'-s- �
P � � ��
_�, �, �.,�,�,.y,,�r,,y.� �-���
�'
��n-0 �
��
�Y
. � �
��B � �
WATER AND SEWER PROJECTS
PRESENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION
IN
THE CITY OF RENTON
WATER PROJECT k A'- �'6, 3'sSEWER PROJECT / DAB
WATER PROJECT TITLEc-tj�.��us(1t {� .4-
PROJECT LOCATION - �0
i
DEVELUPER ,^„"7
ADDRESa
,9-i1tAzz'r'l
PHONE
EMERGENCY
PHONE
CONTRACTOR ���1 Ci,r5�Ri 1�r'/t27�
ADDRESS j7 C �;�X yam/j ��• Tif� G Gt-. 9���//
PHONE
EMERGENCY
PHONE
PHONE
EMERGENCY
PHONE
City of Renton Inspector
Other Inspector
r.
/ PRECONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE �
PROJECT: —',J—gi��� �.,� _. ,��/DATE: `D
1, Z p �_
ADDRESS/LOCATIOW: d �D J ' Y7' L . 6f N '
PROJECT 7! �y,) -- ' . PERMIT 8 WORK ORDER V ��s
***#**k****#k}#*#***k***k***k*******k#*******k*}*****#******#*kk*##kk*#*}*#*Rkk#***
THOSE IN ATTENDANCE
NAME // COMPANY PHONE
9jt -- 2 3 S-26ex
i
776 6 S-e,$--
� � -R.✓/E A _SOA� �GL"T �t/Jv7L/ 2.3 S�Z9�E
— COST ESTIMATE 900441 C3 r11ctINIwA
19 O - PAGE
FINAL
PROJECT NYNa[a— ,0 l — INSTALLATION _
r - M
M OJ[CT L[v
MMIN6 NYYa[a utlNa.Aa[Ntr
-PAVAN oar DATE •r.^flvco Nr OAT[
s0 -
YMIf[piR [[i[Nt101 s
OIrmaw AND li[N YYYM fTT �alagT�L ONTNACT
f �i[N 1�a011 iOT�I N1\[w Lpaoll TOTAL
' I
T � �
all z2Xzzcm?e
— --
�l� .4L.
—
Fi TT/.✓cs — .. � 1-� I c�
AFDC JCT"m 35
o R City of Renton
BuildingR Zoning Depart ant r PERMIT 813613
9 P BUILDING PERM_.
Phone: 235-2540 JOB 813613
Permission is hereby given to do the following described work.according to the cond,- ISSUED
tions hereon and according to the approved plans and specifications pertaining 11/10/67
thereto. Subject to compliance with the Ordinances of the City of Renton
CONSTRUCT SELF SERVICE STORAGE
BUILDING
Job Address Tenant
3408 NE 4TH ST Suite
OWNER VALUE OF
Name Phone CONSTRUCTION
Address HILL TOP ASSOCIATES 206-486-14SS 747,000.00
10709 BEARDSLEE BLVD M101 Permit Fee
BOTHELL WA 98011 Plan Check Fee 2.780.SO
CONTRACTOR Add-on Fee 1 r807.33
Name Phone Other Fee
Address CONNWILL INC 206-486-1455 18.SO
10709 BEARDSLEE BLVD M201 TOTALFEE
Cent, Lac.BOTHELL WA 98011 Tax No. 4,606.33
CO"1*241N6
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT NO WORK IS TO BE DONE SUBJECT TO COMPLIANCE WITH THE ORDINANCES
EXCEPT AS DESCRIBED ABOVE AND IN APPROVED PLANS OF THE CITY OF RENTON AND INFORMATION FILED
AND SPECIFICATIONS AND THAT ALL WORK IS TO HEREWITH THIS PERMIT IS GRANTED.
CONFORIIA TO RE CODES ANDCQIA
NCES BUILDING DIRECTOR 1
Ap plicant� -%� D . By
.......... ...... -------- ._------------------- "'"'-_.-_--- "'-------------------------------------------------------------_.............
..
`� City of Renton CALL FOR INSPECTION
.r Before Work Is Concealed
BUILDING PEPo".IT or Pouring Concrete
Building Zoning DepartmentPhone 235-2542
Inspectionn Record PEF2"AIT 813613
JOB B13613
Job Address Tenant
Owner 340E NE 4TH ST
Contractor HILL TOP ASSOCIATES Suite
Nature of Work CONNWILL INC Total Fee
CONSTRUCT SELF SERVICE STORAGE 64,606.33
BUILDING �G
Installer: Issued By
Sys here 11/10/87
DATE INSP DATE INSP DATE INSP.
I
1 FOOTING 2 FOLADATION I 3 FRAMING
4 PLASTERBOARD S SFEARWALL 6 INSULATION
7 ROOFS B RE-STEEL i 9 FINAL
DO NOT POUR CONCRETE UNTIL APPROVED 24 HOUR NOTICE REOUTAED FOR ALL INSPECTIONS
DO NOT COVER UNTIL APPROVED INSPECTION PHONE 235-2542
DO NOT OCCUPY UNTIL FINAL INSPECTION COMPLETE HOURS 8 AM TO 5 PM
POST THIS RECORD AT JOB SITE MONDAY THROUGH FAIDAY
CORRECTIONS
K _
y City of Renton
Building 8 Zoning Department BUILDING PERMIT PERMIT 8130E9
Inspection Record 308 813089
Job Address 3406 NE 4TH ST Tenant
Owner HILL TOP ASSOCIATES Suite
Contractor CO(*JWILL . INC
Nature of Work SELF SERVICE STORAGE Total Fee $1 r446.11
092305918408
Installer. _ Issued 05/22/87 By
S6 nPrP
DATE INSP. DATE I INSP. DATE INSP.
I FOOTIIJG 2 FOUNDATIO14 3 FRAMING
WALL
4 PLASTERBOARD 5 SHEARWALL 6 INSULATION
7 ROOFS 8 RE-STEEL 9 FINAL
DO NOT POUR CONCRETE UNTIL APPROVED 41 HOUR N
DO NOT COVER UNTIL APPROVED A M.ININUV OF 24 HOURS NOTICE IS
DO NOT OCCUPY UNTIL FINAL INSPECTION COMPLETE
POST THIS RECORD AT SITE REQUIRED FOR ALL INSPECTIO::
CORPECIFIONS INSPECTION TELEPEOI:F: 23`-2542 —
_ 24 ROURS PER DAS''
a
CQ /E CIO vAleN - he t.
nn
yPG- /ySS r
w City of Renton
Building 8 Zoning Department PERMIT 8130e9
Phone: 235-2540 BUILDING PERMIT JOE 613089
Permission is hereby given to do the brow.nq described work.according to the cenC ISSUED
05/22/87
lions hereon and according 10 the approved plans anc specifications pertaining
thereto,subject to compliance with the Ordinances Ot the City of Renton.
SELF SERVICE STORAGE09230591B406
Job Address 340e NE 4TH 6T Tenant
Suite
O W NER 163 r 590.0 0
Name HILL TOP ASSOCIATESTINTINUED
WORK Value of Construction
Address 10709 BEARDSLEE BL. 663.50
BOTFELL WAOMMENCED Permit Fee
Phone 206 486-14550 DRYS $61 .28
R IF Plan Check Fee
CONTRACTOR 6.83
Name CONNWILL. INCRE THAN Add-on Fee
Address 10709 BEARDSLEE St. 0201 180 DAYS 16.50
BOTHEL WA 98011 Other Fee
Phone 206 486-1455 TOTALFEE 114413.11
Conir 'Ic CONNL11*24ING
Tax No
Use District I Sewer'Sept,c Speaai Restrictions
Construction Type vacant Site Occupancy Group
Swiding Square Feet Site Coverao, Occupancy Load
Sae of Elec Service Shen of Budo ng Height Limit
Flood Plain Elev. Sprinklers Required Dwelling Count
Lowest Floor Elev CO Required Parking Count
Flood proofing Eiev. Temporary Story Count
Temporary Days Misc. Code t
Revoccble I Misc. Code 2
I Revocable Days
THIS PERMIT DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK IN PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY OR ON UTILITY EASEMENTS.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT NO WORK IS TO BE DONE EXCEPT
_ AS DESCRIBED ABOVE AND IN APPROVED PLANS AND SPECI-
FICATIONS AND THAT ALL WORK IS TO CONFORM TO RENTON
CALL FOR I INSPECTION CODES AND ORDINANCES Be}Ore Work Is Conrn■l.w Applicant
A MINIMUM Or 24 SOURS NOTICE IS
POR ALL INSPECTI0" SUBJECT TO COMPLIANCE WITH THE ORDINANCES OF THE
REQUIRED
INSPECTION TF.LEPNOT?E: 235-2542 CITY OF RENTON AND INFORMATION FILED HEREWITH THIS
24 aOt1RS PE.R DAY• PERMIT IS GRANTED. BUILDING DIRECTOR
It
w-ihf
51161.00
(B8/43)
September 25. 1980#00 Engineering
Mr, Norman Graunann
CONNWILL, INC.
10709 Beardslee Boulevard, No. ?O1
Bothell , Washington 98011
Subject: Fire flow Analysis for the Highland Self-Service Storage Cawplex
Dear Mr. Graumann:
Two computer analyses simulating a fire at the proposed Highland
Self-Service storage Complex have been performed to determine the fire flow
capability of the City of Renton Water System. Roth analyses were based on
the existing water system. The first analysis was performed with a 12-inch
diam?ter pipeline extension on the north and east sides of the proposed
complex, and one of the largest sources of supply to this zone, the Monroe
Avenue Rooster Pump Station, off. This booster pump station was not
considered as being in operation, since it operates as second lag to the
565 Pressure Zone.
Results of this analysis indicate that the combined available fire flow
from the three fire hydrants located at the proposed complex is
approximately 3.346 GPM, at a residual pressure of 20 PSI in the main
adjacent to the hydrants. However, the velocity of the water in the
Pxisting eight-inch diameter pipeline north of the proposed development is
in excess of 8 feet per second or approximately 10 percent greater than
that allowed by the Washington Survey and Rating Bureau. Although this
flowrate is physically available, there are potentially dangerous and
severe consequences associated with allowing that flowrate to occur. We
recommend that the safe capacity of this pipeline be derated to 1,250 GPM
based on a maximum allowable velocity of eight feet per second, which
results in a total fire flow capacity of 3,229 GPM, which within the
analysis accuracy can be rounded to 3,250.
The flow distribution for this analysis is summarized in Figure 1.
The second analysis was performed with an eight-inch pipeline extension nn
the north ar,l south sides of the proposed complex. In this analysis, the
Monroe Avenue Booster Pump Station was considered to be the lead supply for
this pressure zone.
Results of this analysis indicate that the combined available fire flow
from the three hydrants at the proposed complex is approximately 4.788 GPM
at a residual pressure of ?0 PSI in the main adjacent to tht ire.
1410 Market Street,P.O. Box 1180,Kirkland,Washington 98033(206)827.8400
Mr. Norman Graumann
September 25. 1986
Page 2
However, the velocity of the water in the existing Pight-inch diameter
pipeline north of the Proposed development is in excess of 9 feet per
second or approximately 23 percent greater than that allowed by the
Washington Survey and Rating Bureau. Although this flowratP is physically
available, there are potentially dangerous and severe consequences
associated with allowing that flowrate to occur. We recommend that the
safe capacity of this pipeline be derated to 1,250 GPM based on a maximum
allowable velocity of eight feet per second, which results in a total fire
flow capacity of 4.298 GPM.
The flow distribution for this analvsis is summarized in Figure. 2. In
order for the Monroe Avenue Booster Station to function as a lead supply
for this pressure zone, it will be necessary to modify the pump controls to
enable this station to start up when low pressure is detected in the
distribution system adjacent to the facility or when low pressure is
detected in the Highlands Elevated Tank. Modifications to the control
oyctem include the addition of a remote pressure sensor on the existing
pump controls located at the Highlands Elevated Tank or the addition of a
RTU at the Monroe Avenue Booster Station. The fire flow capability for
this analysis was computed on Insurance Service Office's (ISO) criteria,
which is used by the Washington Survey and Rating Bureau. In accordance
with the ISO criteria , the water system was simulated experiencing a
maximum day demand with the single largest source of supply, Well No. R.
out of service, i .e., due to failure, maintenance, etc. A summary of the
operational conditions used in the analysis is as follows:
- Minimum service pressure of 30 PSI in the service area during
normal demands and 20 PSI during fire demands.
- Well Nos. 1, 2 and 3 are in operation while Well No. 8 is out of
service.
- Springbrook Springs is supplying the system at 1.300 GPM.
- Highlands Pump Station is operating at 1,200 GPM.
- The Mt. Olivet Pump Station is operating at 1,700 GPM.
- The Windsor Hills Pump Station is operating at 1.950 GPM.
- The Highlands Reservoir and Highlands Elevated Tank are both in
operation.
A copy of the computer output has been retained in this office for future
reference. Please contact me if you have questions or comments regarding
this analysis.
Sincerely,
�/R'HH22EJ�ENGIINEERING, P.S.
Randy L. Aslund
Attachment
HIGHLAND SELF- STORAGE COMPLEX
FIRE FLOW ANALYSIS
ANALYSIS #1
•r :r �i
s �
TOTAL CAPACITY
#1 1000 GPM
#2 848 GPM
#3 1500 GPM a
DERATED CAPACITY �
>9•
3250 GPM
r
•r
,X A
n- rn
HIGHLAND SELF- STORAGE C _ MFLEX
FIRE FLOW ANPL YSIS
ANALYS)IS #
e'
T )TAL CAPACITY
#1 1000 GPM
#2 2288 GPM
#3 1500 GPM
•:ti cv � e.v. � •,
DERATED CAPACITY °°� '•�
.�1N'^A4gl y
4298 GPM
Y� isL Yu
,t. •c ,c�u:ar
OF R�
v �y ,; °Z THE CITY OF RENTON
_ MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH.86055
o fF BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • MAXINE E.MOTOR,
9q a.
09, N CITY CLERK • (206) 235-2501
TEO SEeTEo
June 27, 1986
APPEAL FILED BY JOHN L. HENDRICKSON
Re: Appeal of Hearing Examiner's 13ccision, dated June 13, 1996, filed by John L.
Hendrickson, representing GMS Architectural Group; Conditional Use Permit File No.
CU-030-86.
To Parties of Record:
Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 30, City Code, written appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision
has been filed with the City Clerk, along with the proper fee of $75.00.
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the written appeal and other pertinent documents will be
reviewed by the Council's Planning and Development Committee and will be considered by
the City Council when the matter is reported out of Committee.
The Council Secretary will notify all parties of record of the date and time of the Planning
and Development Committee meeting. If you are not listed in lucal telepho - directories,
please call the Secretary at 235-2586 for meeting information.
Sincerely,
CITY OF RENTON
Maxine E. Motor, CIVIC
City Clerk
SI 111,.LR McliROOM"'ES&LL k:AS
SII�M Al NEYS AT LAW•A M(*eSS1lNAL*.¢VICE L'e1tleRMl
BNMwe _
1wu 1 rM YxnJn i.a.i MO N'x)AsY Ceixt
Y[eJlk.M.yYyY.a YIYu
tekpk.IYE,:`�.iHU Eta N1YrY Ave.N E-
l.lny." I.IM.I 0.2 SW belkwYl.W�JwEYovk41
&iea ]Y]WI! tlepRiee(]41U)IK:`
lek..psr l)Uk11)}91M
June 24, 1986
KMN L NENaKK'KS
Iklk.uc 011Ye
City Council (.1%V OF RL:w
City of Renton 'JUN 2 6 1W
200 Mill Avenue South _
Renton, WA 98055 nr Clry armrs yryx ��
He: l p Associates (CMS Architectural Group)
To
Fie
File No. CU-030-86 __.
Dear Council Members:
In behalf of the applicant with regard to the above referenced Conditional Use
Application, we hereby appeal the June 13, 1986, Report and Decision of the Hearing
Examiner with regard to the subject application. The appeal fee of $75.00 is enclosed
herewith.
It was the determination of the Hearing Examiner to conditionally approve Phases 1
and 2 of the proposeL mini-storage building and use located at 3408 N. E. 4th Street
in a B-1 zone. The Examiner's actual decision makes no mention of Phase 3, but it is
implicit from the findings and conclusions that it is the Examiner's intent that Phase
3 be denied.
The applicant specifically requests that the Council overturn several conditions attached
by the Examiner to the approval of Phas(,_. I and 2 and reverse 'he implied denial of
Phase 3 and approve it as originally submitted. The conditions of approval regarding
Phases 1 and 2 which the applicant takes issue wi.h are as follows:
1. The prohibition agairst outside, uncovered storage.
2. The prohibition agamst a residential unit on the subject property.
3. The requirement for ten feet of landscap`.ag along the west and north property
lines.
The Examiner is in error in denying the applicant the opportunity to park certain vehicles
on the property in an uncovered manner. The subject pi )perty has been used for many
years by Pacific Northwest Bell (PNB) as a vehicular storage and repair lot. This site
has regularly beet covered with a variety of mechanical devices and vehicles used by
PNB. The vehicles were parked outdoors in an uncovered manner. The applicant in
acquiring the site has intended to continue that use, although in a considerably more
aesthetic and organized manner. Tie applicant simply wishes to park recreational
vehicles :ind boats, on an interim basis only, in the Phase 2 and Phase 3 area prior to
city Council
'June 24, 1886
Page Two
completion of the structures for those phases. The parking of these vehicles will be
eliminated sequentially as Phases 2 and 3 are completed. The vehicles would be parked
in an orderly fashion and restricted to the areas of the site plan where Phases 2 and
3 are indicated. No other vehicles or mechanical devices will be permitted in outdoor
storage. The applicant has a right to continue this use and fully intended to in acquiring
the property.
The Examiner erroneously concludes that the provision of an on-site manager, 24 hours
a day an; seven days a week, amounts to a residential use which is contrary to zoning
code requirements. The inclusion of such a use is not prohibited by the code and it
is clear that the use is primarily that of an office which will be used as the manager's
facility. Accessory to that use will be several features which are characteristic of
a dwelling bu. are included in the manager's office simply in order to provide the on-site
manager will, all ar the necessary comforts for such a full time position. Clearly the
residential aspects of the manager's use are secondary to its primary function.
.a requirement for additional landscaping along the west and northern boundaries
is not required by code provisions, is not reasonably feasible and will not provide any
additional meaningful benefit for surrounding residents. It should be particuarly noted
that along the west property line the existing structure for the most part is set back
a distance of only 8 feet from the west property line and one portion of the structure
extends for a distance of 42 feet to within approximately one to two feet of the west
property line. Therefore the requirement for a ten foot landscape area along the west
property line would require either demolition of a portion of the existing structure or
moving the entire structure a considerable distance to the east. Neither of these
alternatives is either reasonable nor practicable.
The inclusion of additional landscaping along the north property line would also have
a severe impact. At their present size it would necessarily require the removal of all
storage units along the north property line. Alternatively, they would have to be reduced
significantly in size thereby potentially endangering their usefulness. It is doubtful
that an additional five feet of landscaping will be of any real benefit. Moreover, it
should be noted that the apartments have existed for some time without any apparent
problem while this property was used as a mechanical storage yard without any signficant
landscaping. The applicant's design and proposal will be a substantial improvement
for the neighborhood.
The Examiner also erroneously concludes that the roof connection between Phases I.
and 3, in the northwest corner of the site, would preclude emergency access to the
underground water main which is beneath the roof section. In fact, there will be more
than adequate space beneath the roof in order to accommodate persons and equipment
that might need to access the water main in this area. Furthermore, there is no realistic
likelihood of a break in the water main at this point since problems in this regard
generally occur at a connection or joint, neither of which is situated in the relatively
.mall area which is beneath the roof area.
The Examiner further errs in denying Phase 3 as a result of his denial of the
aforementior^d roof section. phase 3 is the northern wing of the building ..nd is fully
intended to be connected to the remainder of the building. The roof connection is strongly
supported by the Building and 'Zoning Department. Thus file examiner is ina,:curate
in referencing the "staff" as being opposed to this connection.
'. City Council
June 24, 1986
Pe Three
The architectural design that is proposed for this use is an expensive one and is unusally
sensitive to the residential development in the area. The expense of the design has
been accepted by the applicant with the understanding that the proposal includes all
of the features of the original application. The Examiner's decision, however, deletes
the interim parking of recreational vehicles and boats, all of the Phase 3 units, precludes
a 24 hour on-site manager and would result in a partial demolition or moving of the
existing structure. If the Examiner's decision is upheld, it may be necessary for the
applicant to reapply altogether using a substantially different design that is not nearly
as costly as the one proposed. The restrictions sugges.ad by the Examiner undermine
the attempt of the applicant to provide a well-designed structure and use of the property
which will be compatible with its surroundings. The result of the Examiner's decision,
if not overturned, will be to reduce rather than enhance the desirability and compatibility
of the proposed development and use.
It is respectfully requested that a date be established for an appeal hearing before the
Council in order that the foregoing issues, and others, may be more fully addressed.
Very
J
tr }• rsC ,
in L. Hendrickson
JLlt:cgm
Enclosure
3/43
cc: Connw,ll, Inc.
GMS Architectural Group
�•.lr,�.�,t_�1rs,
2425Z
4
CITY OF RENTON
HEARING EXAMINER
PUBLIC HEARING
JUNE 3, 1986
AGENDA
COMMENCING AT 9:00 A.M.:
COUNCIL CHAMBERS, SECOND FLOOR, RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING
The applications listed are in order of application number only and not necessarily the
order in which the3 will be heard. Items will be called for hearing at the discretion of the
Hearing Examiner.
GMS ARCHITECTURAL GROUP
Application for approval of a conditional use permit to allow the
construction of a mini storage building complex in a B-1 District, file
CU-030-86: property located at 3408 N.E. 4th Street.
245nZ
BUILDING AND i:ONING DEPARTMENT
PRELIMINARY REPORT tO THE HEARING EXAMINER
PUBLIC: HEARING
JUN: 3, 1986
APPLICANT: GMS ARCHITECTURAL CROUP
FILE NUMBER: CU-030-86
A. SUMMARY 6 PURPOSE OF REQUEST:
The applicant seeks approval of a conditional use permit to allow the construction
of a mini-storage building complex in a B-1, Business District.
e. GENERAL INFORMATION:
I. Owner of Record: Connwill, Inc.
2. Applicant: GMS Architectural Group
3. Location:
(Vicinity Map Attached) 3408 N.E. 4th Street
4. Existing Zoning: B-i, Business Use
5. Existing Zoning in the Area: G-1, General Use; R-3, Rr=.idential-
Multiple Family: L-1, :_,ght Industrial;
and r -1. Public Use
6. Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Medium Density Multiple-Family
7. Size of Property: ! 1.8 acres
8. Access: N.E. 4th Street
9. Land L ae: Property consists of a building used for
storage and maintenance.
10. Neighborhood Characteristics: North: Residential Uses
East: Commercial Uses
South: Cemetery
West: Residential; Renton Vocational
Technical Institute
C. HISTORY/BACKGROUND:
Action File Ordinance Date
Annexation --- 1480 April 29, 1954
Rezone (GS-I to B-1) --- 1510 March B. 1955
D. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION:
Based upon the above anaiysis, it is recommended that the conditional use permit
request, file CU-030-86, by GMS Architectural Group be approved subject to the
following conditions:
1. Full development shall occur wit in a five-year period.
2. The vacant portions of the site between the phases shall not be utilized for
vehicle, equipment, or material storage.
3. The landscaping installed with Phase III alcny the northern and western
property lines shall be of a size equivalent when installed to the existing
landscaping proposed on Phase I.
PRELIMINARY REPORT 1� THE HEARING EXAMINER
GMS ARCHITECTURAL GROUP. FILE NO. CU-050-06
JUNE 3. 1986
PAGE 2
4. All of the proposed development in the southern 48 feet of the subject site
shall be developed as part of Phase 1. This specifically includes all of the
landscaping, asphalt and fencing necessary. In fact, the southern wall of the
building proposed for Phase 11 should be constructed at this time to create the
general appearance of the proposed building elevation.
5. The proposed removable roof section for the repair of the domestic water
line utility should be approved per the plans submitted.
Ap
GMS ARCHITEC' 'RtAL CONSULTANTS
Ell I ( U-03086
� F
{ ..1i t ryh � (nit � . ,• 1= I
i �:�(it1 E � � � iyN� r 1 �� •� p! f
i:ll , t j� � A ;�. r
It IL weir t� u ILI�y �
-C! 9 _ -;; - --
0
m
0
HIGHLAND SELF SERVICE➢ SITE PLAN
I
STORAGE !o� CONNWLLL INc
0 F ,T11 -..._.___.—'.�__ -rL_._._..._--._._.._
1242E 13. 19M
OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER
CITY OF RENTON
REPORT AND DECISION.
APPLICANT: GMS ARCHITECTURAL GROUP
FILE NO. CU-030-86
LOCATION: 3408 N. E. 4th Street
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Approval of a Conditional Use Permit to allow the
construction of a mini-storage building complex in a
B-1. Business District.
SUMMARY OF ACTION: Building and Zoning Department Recommendation:
Approval
Hearing Examiner Decision: Phase I and 11 approved
with conditions. Phase III denied.
BUILDING d ZONING The Building h Zoning Department Report was
DEPARTMENT REPORT: received by the Examiner on May 28, 1986.
PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Building and Zoning Department
Report, examining available information on file with
the application, and field checking the property and
surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public
hearing on the subject as follows:
The hearing was opened on June 3, 1986, at 9:00 A.M. in the Council Chambers of the
Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner.
The following exhibits were entered into the record:
Exhibit pl - Yellow file containing application, proof
of posting and publication, and other documents
pertinent to this request.
Exhibit 02 - Site Plan.
Exhibit 63 - Elevation Map showing all three phases.
Exhibit N4 - Eleven (I1) photographs showing
scattered parking in the vicinity of subject site.
Tha above exhibits were entered iito the record after which the staff report was reviewed
by Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator. Mr. Blaylock covered such information as the
request for mini-storage to locate in a B-I zone;will be housed on property 1.8 acres in
size; the project will be built in three phases with phase one utilizing an existing building
for storage which was formerly a PNB service area; the B-I zone permits self-storage
warehouses to appear as one building to give the appearance of a commercial building, as
opposed to a storage building with large doors fronting on to public right-of-way and
other public use areas. He described 'he surrounding area as consisting of mostly single
and multiple-family residential with RVTI and Greenwood Cemetery located nearby. The
first phase will be the remodeling of the existing building on the site with the addition of
caretaker/live-in manager quarters on the first floor; the second phase would be the
two-story building to the north and east of the existing building. Mr. Blaylock stated the
applicant felt with all of the residential development taking place in the area there would
be a need for their services, with emergency access through an opening on the northwest
corner of the site. Concern was expressed by the Public Works Department over the
applicant locating a building over a water line thereby preventing them access for repairs
should they be needed. To try to alleviate this concern, the applicant designed a
removeable roof, but Pu' lic Wort; still does not feel there should be a roof structure
located over a water line, even if only temporary.
GMS Architectural Group
CU-030-86
June 13. 1986
Page 2
Continuing, Mr. Playlock state., staff feels the project meets the specifics of the code:
the features of the buildings will blend with the surrounding properties: and questioned
what may happen to the rest of the site during the phasing process - possible storage of
vehicles had been mentioned, which would be an intrusion Into the residential area. He
d for this
ami
units
In thes area. and otherncomplexespslatedltubeo the competed residential there is a oer the netxtffewlyyears.
Concluding, Mr. Blaylock advised staff would recommend approval with five conditions set
out in the staff report to the Examiner.
The Examiner called for testimony from the applicant or their representative in support
of this proposal. Responding for the applicant was:
Rick Gulstrom
GMS Architectural Group
10717 N.E. 4th, Suite #I
Bellevue, Washington, 98004
Mr. Gulstrom clarified that the owner of the property is Hilltop Associates, with
Connwill, Inc. as the developer. He reviewed the project and the applicant's feelings as to
the need in the area. He reiterated the need for r. live-in manager on the site who will
also add to the security of the self-storage project. Mr. Gulstrom reviewed the three
phases and their proposed progression: reviewed the site's existing fencing to be used in
;;;e ,,,Pub;;. v accmcnt of Ic^d2caping; and stated they believe if they bring in the
storage vehicles and place them in the phase 11 building area only, during phase 1, the
impact will be minimized. The area where phase 11 will be built is away from the
residential area and will be approximately 28,000 sq. ft. He stated the applicant feels the
completion of all three phases will be accomplished within a short period of time due to
the high demand for their services in the area. Mr. Gulstrom continued stating storage
will be an interim use: tfare will be a 20 ft.wide section of roof in phase III that will 5e
removable, sprinklered, i nd will connect phase III with the balance of the property. He
feels there should be no problem repairing the water line should this be necessary and
feels there is sufficient clearance for the Fire Department to accomplish said repairs.
Reviewing the vehicle trips per day, Mr. Gulstrom stated phase I will have 2 - 5, phase II
will bring 10 - 12, and phase III will contribute 18 - 20 trips per day. In closing he sated
the applicant feels this proposal is compatible with surrounding structures: height will be
below that permitted at 38 ft.; meets the intent of the Comprehensive Plan; will not be a
24-hour a day operation: and requested approvdl by the Examiner.
was
Calling for further testimony in support we. of the 98036. application,
Miller referred tgo the Engineering
Depan Miller.
rtment
- 56th Avenue W.. rd wood,
Department comments regarding a drainage plan and storm water retention. He stated he
spoke with Don Monaghan from Engineering clarifying the limits of the property, thereby
prompting Mr. Monaghan to modify the condition of storm water retention and a detailed
drainage plan in lieu of the applicant supplying a schematic of the existing system that is
in place and functioning. He had no further comments. Also wishing to speak in favor of
this proposal was Loren Anderson, 3500 N.E. 4th Street, Rentun, We 98056. Mr. Anderson
testified in favor of the development stating his property is a single family dwelling
directly adjacent to this property on the northeast corner. He has lived there
approximately 5 years and has seen the increase in the multi--family units, and expressed
his contentment with this proposal referring to it as a "quiet neighbor". He feels this
business will be more favorable than additional housing in the neighborhood which would
create more population. He also supported the liv--in manager concept for the sitegh'yh
he feels would surpress vandalism on the property. Mr. Anderson did speak In oppo
to the proposed storage of R-V's on the site as there is no time frame for the
development which would also mean the storage could remain on the property
indefinitely. Due to the location and height of his home, his family would be looking
directly down into the storage area He concluded requesting clarification as to the
moving of the existing fence.
Responding to Mr. Anderson's query on moving the existing fence was Mr. Gulstrom. He
advised the fence Is there for the security of the first phase of the site, but after the 3rd
phase the fence on the eastern property line will romain, but on the north end the fence
will come down as it will not be required and the building itself will act as a barrier.
Addressing Mr. Anderson's concerns on the storag,i of vehicles, Mr. Gulstrom presented
Exhibit at showing scattered parking in the area and stating he feels this is proof of the
need for the storage they will provide by removing vehicles from the neighborhood streets
and yards, thereby creating better aesthetics and safety on the public streets.
GMS Architectural Group
CU-950-86
June 13. 1986
Page 3
The Hearing Examine ad for further testimony In support of this proposal. There was
no one else wishing to speak. Wishing to testify In opposition to this proposal was:
Ron Olsen. ---�
Utility Engineering Department
City of Renton
Mr. Olsen advised the Examiner that staff wishes to request relief from ti 3 requirement
of a removable roof section from the building stating there is a problem maintaining a
water line when a structure is placed over the line. He said It would be extremely
difficult to repair this line should it become necessary to repair without the possibility of
obtainlns specialized equipment to remove the roof section; and, If there is a sprinkler
system in the roof section, to close down the water system during repairs could prove tc
be a fire hazard with no water available to the area for fire protection. Mr. Olson
referred to another project within the City Lhat has requested removable roofs and stated
staff feels this would not be a Desirable precedent for the City to permit structures over
water lines. He had no further comments at this time.
LTh
ere was no one else wishing to testify, and no further comments from staff. The
aring was closed at 9:50 A.M.
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS 6 DECISION:
Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the
following:
FINDINGS:
1. The applicar`, 3MS Architectural Group, has requested approval of a Conditional
Use Permit tc allow construction of a mini-storage complex in a B-1 district.
2. The application file containing the application, the State Environmental Policy Act
(SEPA) documentation, the Building and Zoninq Department Report, and other
pertinent documents was entered In the record as Exhibit 01.
3. Pursuant to t. 3 City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (F(CW 43.21C,
1971, as amp .dad), a Declaration of Non-Significance has been issued for the
subject proposal by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the responsible
official.
4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all City departments affected by the
impact of this proposal.
5. The subject site is located at 5408 N.E. 4th Street just east of Monroe Avenue
N.E., and directly north of Greenwood Cemetery.
6. The relatively level parcel is the former site of the Pacific Northwest Bell
Telephone Company maintenance and storage shed.
7. The site was annexed into the City with the adoption of Ordinance 1480 enacted in
April, 1954. The site was automatically zoned G-1 (General) at the time of
annexation. The site was reclassified to B-I (Business/Commercial), it's current
classification, with the adoption of Ordinance 1510 adopted in March, 1955.
8. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the
subject site is located as suitable for the development of medium density
multi-family uses, but does not mandate such deve -ant without consideration
of other policies of the plan.
9. The applicant proposes establishing a self-service storage facility on the subject
site by modifying the existing shed-like structure left by Pacific Northwest Bell
and adding new construction around it. In addition, the applicant proposes adding a
manager's office which will also be used as residential quarters.
GMS Architectural Group
CU-030-86
June 13. 1986
Page 4
10. The applicant proposes constructio-i in three (3) phases, although they have no
specific time frame in mind. Market conditions would motivate construction of
additional phases. Phase I would modify the existing shed and add the manager's
quarters. It would also include a new addition to the rear of the existing structural
components. Phase I would be a large one-story roofed over structure containing
drive through lanes for access to the individual storage areas. It would be along
the westernmost portion of the site along N.E. 4th Street.
11. Phase II would be constructed east and north of Phase I. This phase would be
somewhat 'L-shaped.' It would be two-stories high. The smaller leg of the 'L',
actually a separate building, will be connected to the rear east segment of Phase 1,
at the first floor level. A sky bridge at the second level will connect the two
segments of Phase II to each other. A common facade along the southern edge of
the complex would join Phases I and II providing a unified appearance. Thn
appearance will be of connected peaked roofed buildings. An interior drive-thru
courtyard would be located between the first twn phases.
12. Phase III construction would be at the northern or rear extreme of the site. It is
proposed to be two stories In height, and except for a proposed approximately 21,
foot wide roof segment, would be a separate building. The roof segment
connecting Phase III with the rear-end of Phase I is proposed to be removable by
either a sliding mechanism or a Hnged d,aw bridge type of affair. An easement for
a required looped water main would pass across the site at this location. The
removable section of roof Is proposed to allow access to that line. This roof
segment also spans a gated driveway which would permit emergency secondary
access to the site from the west.
13. The Utilities Water Division objected to the roofed connection between Phase III
j and Phase I. The City does not generally permit any kind of structure over water
main easements since access must be assured. Staff objected to the removable
roof, whether hinged or sliding, since in an emergency Immediate access could be
slowed by having to operate some kind of automatic or manual mechanism to
remove the roof segment. j
14. The applicant requested a Conditional Use Permit since ordinarily self service
storage facilities cannot be established in a B-t zone. A Conditional Use Permit
allows such a facility but only if contained entirely within one building.
15. Staff recommended that the entire front facade be constructed with the
construction of Phase I. The applicant proposes phased construction across the
entire site.
16. Landscaping is proposed along the frontage on N.E. 4th and along the western
boundary of the site. The applicant proposes 5 to 8 feet of landscaping along the
western property line. Landscaping will also he provided along a five foot wide
strip along the north property line. An existing slatted fence will be maintained or
modified to coincide with the project boundaries. The site is bounded on the west
and north by apartment units. Single family uses also lie north and northeast of the
site.
17. Staff has recommended that no interim exterior storage of RVs or other similar
large vehicles or boat trailers be permitted on the unwed portions of the site.
Unlike the proposed use, such outside storage provioes a potpourri (motley,
disorganized group) of sizes, shapes and colors, rather than a unified appearance.
CONCLUSIONS
1. The applicant for a -onditional Use Pormit must demonstrate that the request is in
the public interest, will not impair the public health. safety and welfcre, and in
addition is in compliance with the criteria found in Section 4-748(C)which provides
In part that:
a. The proposa! generally conforms with the Comprehensive Plan:
b. There is a general community need for the proposed use at the proposed
location:
C. There will be no undue impacts on adjacent property;
d. T'ie proposed use is compatible in scale with the adjacent residential uses,
if any:
GMS Architectural Group
CU-030-86
June 13, 1986
Page 5
e. Parking will not occur in required side yards, and that traffic movement
and circulation will be safe;
f. Noise. light and glare will not be adverse;
g. Landscaping shall be sufficient to buffer the use;
h. Adequate public services are available and will not be burdennd by the
proposal.
Tne requested condition: uss appears justified, although as currently proposed,
Priasu III cannot be parr, _,9d.
2. While the Comprehensive Plan suggests medium density multi-family housing for
the area surrounding the subject site, multi-family housing is already located on
the adjoining westerly lot, the arterial nature of the street distracts from
residential enjoyment anJ the design features will blend the use with the adjoining
uses. In addition, multi-family housing Is no longer permitted in a B-I zone, the
zoning on the subject site.
3. The area in which the subject site is located has a large number of apartment
units. Generally apartment residents who have limited on-site storage potential
provide a strong market for self service storage units. The proposal wal meet the
growing community need for this type of service.
4. The scale and generally unified design will prove compatible with the surrounding
buildings. The two story peaked roof complex will bland in with surrounding
development. A reasonable increase in landscaping (sea helow) will assure that the
use is and remains compatible with Its residential neighbors. There will be no
undue impacts on adjacent property.
5. Access to and from the arterial and circulation around and t' ough the site and
building shells appears adequate. The emergency access provided from the west,
through the apartment complex, is also sufficient. The traffic movement, and
circulation will be safe.
7. The proposed project is not unlike other uses along N.E. 4tn and should not
generate adverse noise, light or glare. The use will be closed during evening hours
and therefore should not adversely affect the s, -rounding properties.
e. Since the site is surrounded by residential uses on two sides, and the site itself is
designated on the Comprehensive Plan for residential uses, it appears appropriate
to provide additional landscaping along the west and north property lines. While
the design appears quite reasonable, there will be large expanses of blank wall
which would be more effectively sr,ftened by deeper strips of landscaping than the
5 feet proposed along the north proaarty Ilia and the 5 to 8 feet proposed along the
west line. These limited strips will not provide much in the way of space for
reasonable screening trees. The applicant proposes mcre landscaping along the
south property lire which will of course present a favorable public in ge, but 4th
needs less landscaping from an aesthetic point of view than do the residential
ne,y:.bors surrounding the site. More is also needed to reduce the apparent, if not
the actual scale of the structure when viewed from the adjacent residential areaF.
These narrow bands must be widened to , minimum of 10 feet, and the landscaping
subject to review by the City's landscap�i architect.
9. The use does not appear to be the type of use which will tax the util.cy
infrastructure and adequate public services serve the use.
Ia. As presently configured, Section 4-711TBX3)(n) will not permit the construction Of
Phase III of the project if the loop water main remains part of the proposal. The j
proposed connection of phase III to Phase I making one building of the antire
complex was tenons at best, even with the removal/sliding roof section. The
proposed roof, whether sliding, hinged or completely removable, will not permit
quick emergency response if any problems occur in the water main located under
this feature. The roof segment carnct be approved over the water main easement. t The conditional use trite-ia requires the entire complex to be one building, and this
cannot be accomplished a; proposed. Phase III is therefore, not approved.
GMS Architectural Group
CU-030-86
June 15. 1986
Page 6
Il. The applicant's proposal for interim use of the site for recreational vehicles and
other similar storage cannot to permitted In the B-I zone under thh, current
request. It is not encloses' under one roof. As Indicated in the findings and
graphically demonstrated in photos, such outside storage provides a motley,
disorganized group of sizes, shapes and colors, rather than a unified appearance. It
is unaesthetic and unsuited for property designated for residential purposes in the
Comprehensive Plan.
12. The construction of the entire facade at this time does not seem feasible nor
particularl> necessary. All landscaping should be provided at this time to screen
the site. Future construction can work around the landscaping as necessary.
13. Therefore, in conclusion, Phases I and 11 are approved. Phase III cannot be
approved nor can the interim usage of the site for RV or other similar vehicles
inlass entirely enclosed.
14. This Office remains unconvince� ti—c living quarters, although a practical idea, are
permitted as proposed. While security staff may be � reasonable on-site amenity,
security can be provided without residertial quarters Approval could and probably
would created a precedent which could lead to the proliferation of residential units
In commercial complexes. That is nct something this Office will sanction without
direct authority from the City Council. The consequences of such an action must
be reviewed by the City Council.
DECISION
Tha Conditional Use Permit for orly Phases I and 11 is app:ved, subject to providing 10
feet of landscaping along the west and north property lines. All landscaping Is to be
installed prior to o:cupancy and is subject to review and approval by the City's Landscape
Architect. The approval is further subject to no outside, uncovered storage of any kind
No residential units may be provided on the subject site.
ORDERED THIS 13th y of June, 1986.
FRED J. K MAN
HEARING ENAMINER
TRANSMITTED THIS lath day of June, 1986 to the parties of record:
Rick Gulstrom
GMS Architectural Group
10717 N.E. 4th, Suite 41
Bellevue, Washington, 98004
Don Miller
19502 - 56th Ave. W.
Lynwood, P )shington, 98036
Loren Anderson
5500 N.E. 4.h Street
Renton, Washington, 98056
Ron Olsen
UtiW y Engineering Department
City of Renton
r
GMS Architectural Group
CU-030-86
June 15. 19B6
Page I
TRANSMITTED THIS 13th day of June, i986 to the following:
Mayor Barbara V. Shinpoch
Councilman Richard M. Stredicke
Richard Houghton, Public Works Director
Larry M. Springer, Policy Development Director
Members.Renton Planning Commissior.
Ronald Nelson, Building d Zoning Director
Glen Gordon, Fire Marshal
Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator
Lawrence J. Warren. City Attorney
Renton Record-Chronicle
Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be
filed In writing on or before June 27. 1986. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision
of the E-wnlner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment,
or the .uovary of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior
hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days
from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors
relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, ar review of the record, t^ke
further action as he deems proper.
An appeal to the City Cc inch is governed by Tlt.. section 3016, which requires that
such appeal be filed with the City Cler% accompany'ng a filing fee of $75.00 and meeting
other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or
purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall.
The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one)
communications may occur concerning land use decisions. This means that parties to a
land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the
proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process incwde both 'he Hearing Examiner and
mem9ers of the City Council.
All communications cony:ming the proposal must be made in public. This permits all
interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to
openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation
of the request by the Court.
The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for
Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council.
For purposes of these decisions and recommendations the terms "Should" and "Shall" are
to be considered rr:,,rdatory. The tern "May" will be considered discretionary. When the
report Is a recommendation to the City Council the terms "should" and "shall" are
intended to inform the City Council that if they approve the recommendation the items
should be mandatory to preserve the intent of the decision.
I.M AlI11JN ,w....w^.....•., ..m.ar�.o. tll=M.1LICa.Y1 yV'-.�.. ♦w
D
> > r�.•r��rn
I •p � �
N
T UOIY 1J1"II I If ��•�••��•� I I I \'�i
p r 317.J OJ OM121.3—i 3i3 I I I I I I �.�.Y.,�• V
-
D
rn 3JIffD ov. '� — •�.ww•.•.
�4_7
-�
" . .i '6•
r �w ♦ 4 � ��F�f•w w4.+w.fw� 3
Z fOOb OMII ONU2123
ri
1956
��'.,.• I f• `...••'• �• � r' I l3U::Ur:(i;iCN1�tG DEPT.
i
t
1J30 ONINO'.irmiaiin8
986101 U.C,
:l
(}ga •: z
S
S.E.} ROOF W
Rl o
z m j nt: z
w !
� —MANAGERS QUARTERS !Y
¢ J
. H' •D �r EnSTDlY COW r. U
.r.w..... _ �N.... I ' aLOC}auawa 04..w.Y...M.w.w w. �.w...wY... r W
J <
Z ¢
s. LANDSCAPING PLAN _ _ _ •qT�a t! O
:./ yLMIT KEY
R
r
oil
� fimell `ti
s. o
�� ♦♦ ■ m y ;p-r� r
7 _ :� m I __
�4
J 1�� 'il:/ /�;l ; _ t' Jt1.JN�-l:.1.Jri .1•• ��.Gi '' •I ff ... •c N11lY S.'=.
J �:� K' I I' !1 •1•,I �I �' Is .e .. ,j.. � �1� • • ,-.� gl-.� � ♦ .l-1 __
\�`{' _ -• , ; ..:- ,�.>, I , 1. I .�.'1'• �' �.; ,
1`A 1•I'�•I5�5�'•` '•'y...,,ii�"_'i1'i' rSi1J L �t-•9���' .�
R_2 Gi 1
I
R-3 �u AC - -
I
SITE
-- ,�' B- 1 B- 1
T I i
H i
i J .
J�CIEEt'1W 6.I VERY - —TR-a
G_ 1 i�
GMS ARCHITECTURAL GROUP
CY-030-86
APPLICANT IC ARrHITF('TTIRai GROTIR TOTAL AREA '_ R arRF(;
PRINCIPAL ACCESS N F AIM aT
EXISTING ZONING RIIRTNFSC ITsF. R-T —
EXISTING USE F.XT9TTNr ITITTnTNc F(]R <?y)Rar.E AMn MLT=Nl&NrF—_
PROPOSED USE MTNf_cmnaarc nnrT nrwc mMRrcx
COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN mrnTTlM nFNCTTV W"TT�'aMTiy
COMMENTS
2425Z W— s'7�
CITY OF RENTON
HEARING EXAMINER
PUBLIC HEARING
.,UNE 3, 1986
AGENDA
COMMENCING AT 9:00 A.M.:
COUNCIL CHAMBERS, SECOND FLOOR, RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING
The applications lifted are in order of application number only and not necessarily tl e
order in which they will be heard. Items will be called for hearing at the discretion of the
Hearing Examiner.
GMS ARCHITECTURAL GROUP
Application for approval of a conditiinal use permit to allow the
construction of a mini storage building complex in a B-1 District, file
CU-030-86: property located at 3408 N.E. 4th Street.
FCC. fWMI[` .X`" ilhc 'Zt+QN[f,(S^�O✓� )fi'`"O✓'hCC7 X0:%F
100sVOLY
$O6c4sc fta[[y4 KSv7 -Q .fo�FTiwJ
�A.I.It�( Of S�[st6�• AT Al[bN> "1LY /([���.e[Pir S[<<+y �pw.'�/
6 Q&n WJ 7u[S Ag6t
S'u9 S *Lorl TW F,r1G fuLS iw 7g� ,®.rot
2430Z
BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER
PUBLIC HEARING
TUNE 3, 1986
APPLICANT: GMS ARCHITECTURAL GROUP
FILE NUMBEF: CU-030-86
A. SUMhiP.RY 6 PURPOSE OF REQUEST!
The applicant seeks approval of a conditional use permit to allow the construction
of a mini-storage building complex In a B-1, Business District.
B. GENERAL INFORMATION:
I. Owner of Record: Connwill, Inc.
2. ADpl�cant: GMS Architectural Group
3. Location:
(Vicinity Map Attached) 3408 N.E. 4th Street
4. Existing Zoning: B-1. Business Use
5. Existing Zoning in the Area: G-1, General Use: R-3, Residential-
Multiple Family: L-1, Light Industrial:
and P-1, Public Use
6. Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Medium Density Multiple-Family
7. Size of Property: : 1.8 acres
e. Access: N.E. 4th Street
9. Land Use: Property consists of a building used for
storage and maintenance.
10. Neighborhood Characteristics: North: Residential Uses
East: Commercial Uses
South: Cemetery
West: Residential: Renton Vocational
Technical Institute
C. HISTORY/BACKGROUND:
Action File Ordinance Date
Annexation --- 1400 April 29, 1954
Rezone (GS-1 to B-1) --- 1510 March B. 1955
D. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION:
Based upon the above analysis, it is recommended that the conditional use permit
request, file CU-030-86, by GM5 Architectural Group be approved sub)ect to the t
following conditions:
I. Full development shall occur within a five-year period.
2. The vacant portions of the site between the phases shall not be ut':,_ _,
vehicle, equipment, or material storage.
3. The landscaping installed with Phase III along the non{,arn and vast,ro
property lines shall be of a size equivalent when installed to the existing
landscaping proposed on Phase 1.
PRELIMINARY REPORT TL THE HEARING EXAMINER
GMS ARCHITECTLIPAL ..IROUP. FILE NO. CU-030-86
JLAE 3, 1986
PAGE 2
4. All of the proposed development in the southern 48 feet of the subject site
shall be developed as part of Phase 1. This specifically includes all of the
landscaping[ asphalt and fencing necessary. In fact, the southern wall of the
building proposed for Phase II should be constructed at this time to create the
general appearance of the proposed building elevation.
5. The proposed removable roof section for the repair of the domestic water
line utility should be approved per the plans submitted.
GMS ARCHITECTURAL CONSULTANTS
° = CU-030-86
77
� r
f�
o •.e.yj � r, � i�4o 1t 1L' ' 1'
$ j t:t f S t t f 1 � ,J! .Y+•l'� � w �,1[ j
!"� ' r. . Y=:tw � OAT I M�.• I•< -9`��
--'
^A♦•, w'C--i�r l MyE.U°STN[ET
n n
0
^ v
T[(: HIGHLANO SELF-SERVICE SITE P'.AN + 1
i'
t:::
l � .••.) STE,RAGE log wdNWILL IN
G
1E'.
oTAIE er rApitElBlox (..'}I
' ONAMIIfMT OF WCIrAL AM HI ALTN eIII4CE3' -
WATER BACTERIOLOGIC4%L•ANALYSIS
SAMPLE COILFC'ION READ INSTRUCTIONS ON BACK Of COLOENR,.lROPY
If InstrMctiot.s are not fO,lOwed,tamPle will be rejaofed.
I"TE COLLECTED TIME COLLECTED[COUNTY
MONTH JAY YEAq
IYAM ❑ PM K I ab
TYPE OF SYSTEM W PUBLIC SYSTEM,COMPLETE: ;+
( UB IN L0. No. I 1 art IE sa
❑ INDIVIDUAL 3
!1 Lz 7 a i
NAME OF SYSTEM
nK f " F Nfa*l
tptp SPECIFIC LGCATION WHERE SAMPLE COLLECTE M UNIER MfA NAM ND E ER VAN '
SSBow $44
M00111- ( T23S-Ili!
SAMPLE COLLECTED BY:1..m1
A163)ouL 6AFDUR . (INS, I&Wvrrtavl
SOLaN;E TYPE
❑S7 RFACE ❑WELL ❑SPRING ❑ PURCHASED ,L Io OTHER
.LAOMBINATION
BEN RT TO:IPn 1 Fyn ArbrPae eae ESP I
� Y nY e��Pltau- �l�la E�
ZMj' HILL AUF Sa .
;V, PO�UU �. .WASHINGTON
TYPE OF SAMPLE
<—'wh—.ma cromn,
1. ❑ DRINKING WATER ❑ CNornuted(Reaiduar_Tolal_Fm,
check treatment—) ❑ Flllered
❑ Unheated or Plnar
P. ❑ RAW SOURCE WA TEA
3. ® NEW CONSTRUL TION or BlItlBB
A. OTHER(SW,f,) .
COMPLETE IF THIS SAMPLE IS A CHECK SAMPLE
I
PRf VIUU.14P NO_
PREV WUS SAMPLE COLLECTION DATE
EMARKS
;aM0 'tV 40. e51R
LABORATORY RESULTS(FOR LAO USE ONLY)
MPN-COLIFORM STD PLATE COUNT SAMPLE NOT TESTED
5 wa �n BECAUSE.
MPN DILUTION« TEST UNSUITABLE ❑ Sample Too Old
P
/W ml 1. ❑ Confluent Gruwlh ❑ Notm Proper Container
MF COLIFORM
Z. 0 TNTG Inaulfliant IOeAM� mI Provided-Plesse ese Read
FECAL COLIFORM
3. ❑ Excess Debts In'tructtona on Form
❑ MPN 0 MF 4 ❑
Aw m _
FOR D41K Z WATER SAMPLES ONLY,THESE RESULTS ARE.
C�ISATISFACTORY G UNSATISFACTORY
LAB Na DATE T [RECb VED- f RECE,VEP Br
k
SORAID
REMARKS
WATER SUPPLIER COPY
t
r
'— Dsl+s,�uprr,mten i
STAW OF WASNINOTON
DommE11T OF SOCIAL AND HEALTH SERVICES.
WATER BACTERIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS
SAMPLE COLLECTION READ INSTRUCTIOrIS ON BACK Of GOLDENROD COPY If FR EN UOIVS ere not 11011Owed,tlemple will be re*cWd.
TE COLLECTED I TIME COLLECTED I COUNTY FUME
NEON"
DAY AR ro L4
F 4 : ❑❑aM kit14
TYPE OF SYSTEM IF PUBLIC SYSTEM,COMPLETE:
PUBLIC I. CIE CU55
C INDIVIDUAL D.No. T}. (, 1 2 a A
NAME OF SYSTEM
LatY IV, F4f5U>J q
SHCIFIL l(ICARON WNE SAMPLF LOOECIE SYSTEM NAME AND TRFraANE NO
n halm un a ecrm.rw 4n m hvnwn
YJ-4��- NI(F1InHD .statacE A'f SEED _
SAMPLE COLLECTED BY.(N.1
A-b'?ou L (MOu R . 6NsT !N SPfc'-a�
SOUAqE TYPE
SURFACE ❑WELL ❑SPRING ❑PURCHASE- COMBINATIONA or OTHER
SEN REP TO_
:IPnnI Fun , a.A0dhw.Ah`
!,� ORT " tr,+T, APCoeR
w-
Zoo- NR-L
TYPE OF SAMPLE
1. ❑^ORINKINGWATER (2 Chl.IIaf dIR"Idual TOIei_Free)
clwch Irealrnenl�•► ❑ FnTered
❑ Untreated or Other
2. 0 RAW SOUEK'E WATER
3.E NEW CONSTRUCTION onfN:PAlE16
4. OTHER(SPec1(y)
COMPLETE IF THIS SAMPLE IS A CHECK SAMPLE
PRFVIOUS IAS NO
PREVIOUS SAMPLE COLLECTKNN DATE
REMARKS.
+ LABORATORY RESULTS TOR LAe USE MY)
M Nt COLIFORMI STO PLA r°COUNT SAMPLE NOT TESTED y
BECAUSE:
MPN I TCST UNSUITABLE ❑ SMN IA Too Old
Con(lurnl Growth ❑ Not,h Proper Container
lotMF b
1. J TNTC. ❑ Prou dW- leawMor,Read
Prot dad-Pleas.Read
FECPIU
3. ❑ Fhcaae Debns Instructions on Form
^
❑ MPN C7 MIF I 4 ❑ I ❑ I
AN -
FORAIMNEING WATER SAMPLES ONLY.THESE RESULTS ARE.
SATISFACTORY ❑ UNSATISFACTORY I
SEE'PIEVERSE SIDE OF GREEN COPY FOR EXPIANATION OF RESULTS -
lAe NO1 DATE.nME RECENED- IEOEIVED BY
CIAO REPORTED LABORATORY.
III.
REMARKB
WATER SUPPLIFR COPY e,
k.
HIGHLANDS SELF-SERVICE STORAGE NE 4TH BETWEEN ROE AVE & 11WAVE 2
D9HS TFIn(Rldll
1 NTATN OF WAM MYON
l OMANTMOff OF SOCIAL Af10 tWALTN IERVRtA._�
kr WATER BACTERIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS
SAMPLE COLLECTION. RFAU'NSTRUCTIONS ON BALK OF GOLDENROD COPY
If Inatructions are not followoo Mmple Will be rejected.
DATE COLLECTED TIME COLLECTED COUNTY NAME
M THONAY YEAR 1 , 11 -
5 z O 6 1AM J❑ Pill K��4
'.ih PE OF SYSTEM IF PUBLIC SYSTEM,CCMPLETE:
y PUBLIC nacrt 114S I
/ ❑ INpIVIDUAM.I I.D. No. 1 8 5 O L T 2 3 4
NAME OF SYSTEM
i l
OT'i OF QCIETivic- Q 1b
r SPECTIC LOCATION WNERE SAMPLE COLLECT, SYSTEM OAaENMOI.SOME MMMEM4%
a in.1.Al Kn-I.-un .."'N
.$(4d8 F6E Ale Sy �QLEM4 NA1611t
p IL T]1 �iLVEC PlbM+b+d+ ) 13S' 1Cs1
SA PL OLLECTF Y.INamn ,
be)DOLLL, 6{�pUR_ ulflni itr w.
SOURCE TYPE N�f�
❑ SURFACE ❑WELL ❑SPRING ❑ PURCHASED /'M TOOMTHERTION ;
( ND REPORT TO.Wrim F W Name.AWrr»aw E,p l I
ny DT 'Df AMU . U-NLI I`[ F FIl DGdE �
HILL Ill So-
TYPE OF SAMPL[
1[. ¢n..+omr m�m�wr aduna
Y
T. ❑ DRINKING WATER ❑ CNIaitMtetl lReaitlwe_Rral_Frael
CNeca traetment--0- ❑ Flllere,
❑ Untrwled or Oil_
P..r❑T1 RAW SOURCE WATER
3.` NEW CONSTRUCTION or-f&' PS
4,n OTHER(Spetty)
COMPLETE IF THIS SAMPLE IS A CHECK SAMPLE
PREVIOUS,AR NO
PREVIOUS SAMPLE COLLECTION DATE
RE/MRK �R� 16i Fff 14 —S�GYOIV✓ --__
LABORATORY RESULTS(FOR LAN USED ONLY))
N-COLIFORM STD PLATE COUNT SAMPLE NOT TESTED
BECAUSE'.
MPN DILUTION TEST UNSUITABLE ❑ Semple Too Old
/100 mI 1. ❑ CoNlpenl Growlh ❑ Not In Proper Conletner
Mf COLIFORM
Q. ❑ TNTC ❑ •-wihmenl IBase Rlion
�m.T,; ProYuchonPlease rn,
Im!ruCliOnb on Forn•.
FECAL COLIFOR J. ❑ E•,eae OeDna
❑ MPN ❑ MF 4 ❑ ❑
/On mi
FOR DRINKING WATER SAMPLES ONLY.THESE RESULTS ARE'.
SATISFACTORY ❑ UNSATISFACTORY
E REVERSE SIDE Of GREI N COPY FOR EXPLANATION OF RESULTS
LAB NO DATE. IME RECENED RECEIVED BY
c ) 5 _ ,
�' ' _'►
DA REPORTED D To r
REMARKS
WATER SUPPLIER COPY tl
CITY OF
RENTON WORK Ok jER - DISTRIBUTION DEh QT"M'ENT ,{ {
No. 7
PROJECT NO., DATEI9Q C1
' PROJECT NAME /V Gl' lr-Cd p d (�/ _
IFUNCTION OR DESCRI►T OF PROJECT `S O - �(. �G• 4�_y
A7[i d -crr �L/lc���f�=• _r.c•.. c.
&'
BY CITY FORCES Ly CONTRACT ❑ IF CONTRACT NO.
CONTRACTOR'S NAME
q 1
CONTRACTOR'S ADDRESS 'p �`�'b._�`� �'f ''� O D,kl V(i-t'd"
ESTIMATF^ COST ,FUNORVO SOUK! ACMM COST_
1 AGREEMENTS ❑ IF SO, NO.- SPECIAL BILLING l❑- IF SO,
j TO c, /Nc j07o �- � Z-,9e � t�
!I COMMETED_ � ,•'� � 'f��1�
APMIOVED SY 4•vL� ��Jl�/ _
�ITY OF RENTON WATER DEPARTMENT M
Pressure Test b Purification Test Form
PR(` SECT No.
NAME OF PROJECT: �AifihLho Sw QERUicf S�aKh{E
PRESSURE TEST TAKEN BY A-gpow, Gi{>Fp�M1—
AT A PRESSURE OF 1120 PSI, FOR (Q MINUTES
p� doer
TEST ACCEPTED ON 3IL3/1�$ n
PURIFICATION TEST TAKEN BY
PURIFICATION TEST RESULTS, SAMPLE 01 >,{ o . w1- FJE 4'
SAMPLE #2
SAMPLE A3 b
PRESSURE COMPLETE AND PURITY COMPLETE
No connections to mains or meter permits issued until above box is
checked by Inspector.
REMARKS:
rJRlt WAx5 WAr'OW
lulaX D:r:s:71
WI (pp rfllf0l, rr5r�:'KT0 I
AMLKATN)N ONLY-UNTIL YAUDATED i�o
L q4 r '7- 3 S
lan.f CT:pN3 ftES
I CONSTRIKtKMI "+• sMa --
St Cf\ SMi
ryrl,: .erMrt•wv1 ••ter Later~ fees
:eats leer•'Awt.«: r«.
L.tw..st r."
J( . if >...:.: '.kP..lt - :ItrN rUa:
k+i\ul y. :au
:'SAL Rea
..ryaap of ►rk
.w Weak.. . r.+ gl i.. _i�il tAN ell/r •J.•ftl /rid �:f `,Yt
t..•Owl.:Ai f_ t.T,i.., . e. •
atsrrr iyy'_�Ct.✓ / 1. _ta..taAwt . G,r %7/ram
IT :L 'iLA TaL 11MT S1S :� '7 K w O An M A:1
-AI l I :R.tT WS-V •.- ". IM'.J `f SAM wA.
ANI Y .l ir.r mZ •:TT;% :Nr w:•! . I•.A \ .I%i. M:\ r'ev 1! . 4 v. .
U.MIX. KIlW -.WTIWW '.. :MATT 'T:::•:I. rosy ri: .Ajlt.
t l: wtv«. . AN .N � AP : At I
+ L M I.
.fr.r+
t. K -t .:.•
tar .r y.cttu. a .cna . r.' + •v ::•f-^ .
sm:rT Tm rear :vra'T: %
0 L1.7.:_ 1.8 .Vwt ..ie. :i'..[ .!l-!Lt(.l r./tt• �.t(tilfr
KALIC W(M DE►AETMW
WRDP6 DIVISION
CIT1 DV UNION. Ul91IWTOW
AM ICATION OMY-DIITIL YAIIDAM Jn�mnT E•��S
oav Imu"a Ct Utr\
o a_ iGi
3I/C f. A..E, �*
l3ajAjL F GJA- W.A& rr 8¢ Sr=z ga s S
INERIORS FEES
CONSTRUCTION At" Arart
fum S~
PERMIT 191ttsJ-Y.f fsrtntrliw '"3SS;�-
` $r. t•tllllf two• fr - W[H
-- IrttAl lc Itigllt-of-Ip•JI `III Y.to, Lat comrt IN.
-! I Y.l.r lMr•/A"rN.l fN.
sp. t'tllln f M. T. - Swrer
Swter Lat Harr feN
Dev bra.0 IrNaiN fm —���
1. 4I SM.1.1 D.W.lt - CA$% FDm
�ir.tla.Jytr 1 I.RAL RFQ� �r
« .. of .t
.Y IMMbor t too. 'jl c a.
._/�-- —
// ,l yp1�l.�wlCl wt....! .1414 &-t j. tft.eC
GH.IrH evt\M.. /M fj')
Lt)r.�.:...�G.. _ (wc RPoy� �1.I.PA•Jfd 3•Gc�Oo
It IS '1MOSSOW 14T To cl" m S'O}IOY SIWl a lmD .MOIiaA Q AA m All
LIMILITST. DAAALI -r IWer MISTM e m SSW'wNIST w SAID tfltr.
AIfJ Ism 3,90000 L YIT.It M AlrJrO-1 v w d ■[YU mi. I Y OOQ H A
t=ZlISSD. SOMM C\mfrkhc 'U. I=JITS MILITIO l 1=11VA
OLL J/Y 17J1 m lwr TM.
call Mews A M r.0 I " tH /J1LlO1l: _
Lm. t/rr 1. .rtotr n. :e::
"to.. IJ bon t r.T N}otr
ter L..Pwtl. t. rarrtnq. RrL:' trll[f
IMM TM
do 71f-7670 far .vwl .tqa. CALL AEfOAE 1y DIG tt(,Ce.l[.CL/H r .f—
W 149NIM. 4E•Ig115 LOCATDaS
i-lDD-AEA-SSSS
,�{.q i •bit! v t. ti'� - t 1•iC•if' 4 S;�
Tr-• �.. r
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
BUILDING DIVISION
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
APPLICATION ONLY - UNTIL VALIDATED PERMIT
NUMBER
Owner Location of W,,..
Address
!NSPEC' JGS FEES
CONSTRUCTION Side sewer
S Corm Sever
PERMIT Right-of-Way Construction ---
Sp. Utility Conn. Fee - Water
(Public Right-of-Way) Water Latecomer Fees
Water Insp./Approval Fees _
Sp. Utility Conn. Fees - Sewer
Sewer Latecomer Fees
Sewer lnsp./Approval Fees _
Date Issued Inspection Fees
Special Deposit - CASH BOND
Expiration Date TOTAL FEE
Description of Bork
and Number of Feet
Contractor Business
License
Address Bond
Telephone
IT IS UNDERSTOOD THAT THE CITY OF PZNTON SHALL BE HELD HARMLESS OF ANY AND ALL
LIABILITY, DAMnGE OR INJURY ARISING FROM THE PERFORMANCE OF SAID WORK.
ANY WORK PERFORMED WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY OR ON SEWER MAIN MUST BE DONE BY A
LICENSED, BONDED CONTRACTOR. LOCATE UTILITIES BFFORE EXCAVATING.
CALL 235-2631 FOR INSPECTION.
Call between 8 AM and 9 AM for APPLICANT '
irspection in afternoon; call
before 12 Noon the day before
for 'inspection in morning. PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
SPECIFY TIME FOR INSPECTION.
CAT.L 235-2620 for street signs CALL BEFORE YOU DIG BY
and lighting. 48-HOUR LOCATORS
1-800-424-5555
AUTHORIZATION OF SPECIAL BILLING
DATE:
PROJECT NAME: N _l
PROJECT '+UMBER: C'
WORK ORDER NO. :
It is the intent of this letter to authorize the City of Renton to bill
the undersigned for all costs incurred relative to the above-referenced
project, by the City of Renton for the following work:
BILLING TO BE SENT 0:
Name. Lam_
Address pp.
City: ap':� IIState•Wk C
Atten: n Nl4P�
Phone No. : !tek 145
j
/Developer, Cont to
Aut orized Agent
DATE:.,. dY
ATTENTION:
A-P)Do ut,- u Ai,a R,
FILLD INSPECTOR—
ATTACHED ARE AS-BUILT —PRIINTS FOR
PROJECT: W• ? 03
-- g Ki611LAr,9 SELF Af,c
PLEASE FIELD CHECK AND RETURN THIS SLIP WITH YOUR
COMMENTS TO:
INSPECTOR'S COMMENTS:
T_ ui1T_-S And OK ?
z�eu.Qi euei