Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
LUA90-034
LIGHT STANDARD if C.I.WATER MAIN O ')� VAULT 41 SIDEWALK z'GAS MN �� I MD YON IN CASE / �+ 16_D.I.WATER MAIN _ • n - EN Y0N �" EDMONDS AVE N.E. IN CASTE- zzza— � ITARY — s OO D.nO-w _ _ �_ _ — — — — C,AQ- T T BURIED TEL GABLFf I 331.62' 18' T To c T �® S 0059Y0'VI .256.69' —m...." / I.. 9.: ;9" SIAT 2 LL Y8 N0 PARING 10• _ / DRIVEWAY +N ®f CONC OURB k LI6RT STANDARD J18� 20' .JBO% ®I PARKINGGUTTER CM) .- r z W FP • �aT 10'I 5'CONC SIDEWALK . 10.EVERGT O Or 08. 1 'QCS'g I I SHED 104 • a ''\\\\\\\\\ '� % 1 _ PORCH \ HOUSE ..` LEDIALTESTEIETIll z 12• . . 6'JUNIPER \\\\\\\\\\\ \ WEST 1/4 Cr THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTMEST 1/6 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF 1HE VEST 1/2 Cf TIE SECTION 99.TTOWNSHIP • GRAVEL I I m 23 NORTH,RANGE T 5 EAST,W.Y.: 3 �+ EXCEPT THE F FOR D FEET AVENUE AND EXCEPT THE WEST 30 FEET TiEREOF FOR EDMONDS AVIIJUE NORTHEAST SITUATE W THE III:: CITY OF RENTON,COUNTY OF KIND,STATE OF WASHINGTON. + 4'HIGH ROCKERY 1'HIGH �*F , 6-10 OS MAGNOLIA \\\\���\\ 12-2'CEDARS �� ® _ DG WATER VALVE WATER tar,of Asxtex) \ HOUSE FIRE HYORAM CAS (1P.01 Ae 7Win0w)aes) + \ 4.O 0 SAN SEWER MANHOLE �- STOfdi DRAW—Iv-- SANITARY SEWIDX terry OF uNTax) \\\\\\\\ ® STORM DRAIN MANHOLE ---TT-- (Par e •1010 mu)) 4.O ± 10'APPLE • 0 CATCH BASIN 410 • I 350 0 BELL TELEPHONE MANHOLE / MEE © 10' © ALDER 2-18* © 8 ® CEDAR ' i FIR • �'•� ® MAPLE 'l 8 10'DE0D. iLS/H HOLLY rl 2-10. • 0 OTHER • . I 6' 0.• + '\\\ • 082-10• \APARTMENT • SITE . ALDER BRUSH \ ®\\\ (f w I '' NE,2TH ST 4 eT 0'• . ir PARKING 1 Il PITCE • .J I x�.�,, N d050J�'E r, Y 256.70' % K I -ti Tillril---H �._J WOOD FENCE VICINITY MAP NTS APPROVAL I ARED BY PREP MEET Baima & Holmberg Inc. ,:m1„ " MICHAEL ROGERST DATE ENGINEERS & SURVEYORS n-oa-Bs , < EDMONDS AVE N.E. SITE Ifiswwa n�aroe taw MOM au-mooy�"MS ILL=MN �/ - 6 70_ ,I • J23 NO. MESSED B( DRAM BY OE77®BY •.xa '_t MEET OSIDHT 2 ffl: 532-001 I No, DESORPTION BCHEWDATE ___ YSH YISH 0TREEs/unuTIES MD MDN LjJ t' `` _, IN CASE I ,E , — EQMDNDS AVE N.E. �CASE°MON � zz2ar �— : / I — se• — /, — �— Z� R ` aatsz• — — — �y A CO• 2 / rye/ - _ SCALE 1'-SF ''',-'''.,..,./.::- --- . . • ' J - . N 0050•3S E 256.70' • Balms & Holmberg Inc. „Store;;? MICHAEL ROGERS s» 2 DAM NNG SNEERS & SURVEYORS Io .� ] 11-03-89 EDMONDS AVE N.E. SITE OF uee E,< R.E maa.Dm . JOB No / COOED BY LOGIN EN GEnEa BY `' y„A NEEY COMM' 2 532-001 IIEV.NO, DL1gPPEW BY OOZED DALE --- YSN , BOUNDARY K TOPOGRAPHIC MAP o Illealit I- .J. I' . [ . Mira , 1-\ I ail 1 "_' cir<1L. , . .l <17J I ,_, IL( l Ltd cz •1 0 1 '-. r 1 r 0 u , :,,,,,,: , ,..____:,. . ..,._ I - - L ,,,,,91 J. - 11J ' L>i c3 , -, r- •7--- 2 1v o o t o o - :,__ rol ,- . . CD a r-- � t it ��� J 0-arva 0 i'L' ill ........______ + -19 ctNi . .____............... . s cd Fr TLL-- .:--==- _� IL- • r . , 11 . \e_.,.. ,.. . i , .4.....„ • ..,1 _ z.e. f ix 7.. ___ t ._0 ,.._,....\ �Oo' oo . ; • .) , rm . , ....... - •L' o ng ,_____.... <1 ICJ L.(:D C1J LJ�� _�i IZI , w �Zile i N`� , • II i 1\--",7F,- ,U A 7_4 r--Tr/-%{' 1771 /\'' -0-1 P1 I �ii 'ZKi 2 L Zt�il `/ Z/rjf �_s 11(10 f 'I /, ynti A 3 yNn 1iNn t-_,, a.1i r1 lgol • • ;6__„_.14 _iHni , Z -4 ai' • I _b ik) to' . - r toL a., :c14 •\.'kj- E_ - 1,./ ,,,0 1 0 r? ' -'=2) .f. ,.._ 0 0 0 pp 1 / 1 , lam,_ xN co R-- - v ' -� �- 2: , -041 \ - r }7-77.10EV _k,..,E 1167141..utvo ,L.LINo - 1 .r• .-.7 . 0 -WO . , _ .,, : , . . . . , T AND SCOTT . 44?-i t(MNT VAcANCY REPORT . ...„ . .. ---- 9/26/89 ---- --03/89 MAP UNIT AVG X AVG MIN MAX AVG X AT,-...A NO TYPE RENT VAC REN:'/SF RENT RENT RENT VAC RENTON 26 Overall $481 3,4 ___ --- --- $448 4 Studios 290 9.2 65.5 235 395 337 4, • One Bed 412 2.9 60.1, 280 570 397 - :?Bd/1Ea 482 5.1 54. 315 660 467 28dl2Ba 555 2.s 5 400 651 526 4Y..;,0";'T'.J, 27 Overall o434 5.0 .-_- isit _,._ 4+1_ Studios 341 2.5 70.0 295 460 :s35 b., . e Bed 365 4.1 56.0 310 520 37() 6_4 ' Bd/2Tta 47C 8.4 52.6 345 605 457 6.f 26d/2 521 2.8 53.6 y 6 V .)vi 4 ' 3Bd/18a -- ._ -_- ___ ..... 558 ;: " 3Bd/2Pa 615 4.511- 48.1 475 695 621 _ 4 t- 1 . P Tl - 28 Overall S458 2.0 --- --- _-.. a::56 2.2 • tudios 395 3.1 80.2 274 585 355 _ Inc Becl 446 2.1 69.9 3C,2 6 .). 455 2Bd/13a 570 0.0 67.1 375 625 58? 2. 28d/2Ba 657 0.0 64.0 635 825 643 7 3Bd/1Ba 619 0,0 6°t.8 /J5 625 570 7. 3Bd/2Ba ___. _-_ --- - _-- --_ - : . 1 2Bd/lBa 525 4.4 57.2 270 665 50. 3.8 'Bd/28a '763 0.0 75.4 625 888 • 2 14.0 Bd/2Ba --- --- -__. ___ _-_ _ - -_- ITT . 72 n *la TE: CENT 0 Overall $465 4.6 .-•-- - - ___ $423 4.5 41014.- Studios 295 0.0 62. 1 295 295 25 0.0 One Bed 411 4.7 57.7 300 455 379 3.3 2Bd/1Ba 504 4.4 50.4 345 575 447 5.5 2Bd/2Ba 508 4.7 48.8 450 585 484 6.0 • 3Bd/1Ba -_ --- --_ _-_ _._ --- Bd/2Ba 613 6.3 49.0 565 660 54', U.0 itilio The Cain and Scott Apartment Vacancy Report is published semi-annually.Subscription:S250.00 per year.Copyright by Ca?r, and Scott, Inc,,220NV. Mercer, Suite 4(7, Stattlt, ' 'asl';ngtor 9R119-3954 The contents of this rbhication 1 "ay not be rr•produced either in whole or in part without the consent of the copyright holder. PHONE:(206)285-7100 EXHIBIT ITEM NO • Pr 1 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: DATE CIRCULATED: 4 4 90 COMMENTS DUE:_4/18/90_ ECF 034-90 APPLICATION NO(S) : R-034-90 PROPONENT: George J. Xenos PROJECT TITLE: Rodgers Rezone BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks reclassification of a 1.75 acre parcel from R-1, Single-Family Use to R-3 , Multi-Family Use, consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The property is currently deeloped with a single-family home and accessory buildings, which will be demolished if reclassification is achieved, and the property will then be developed with a multi-family complex. a conce[tual site plan has been provided for information only. LOCATION: 1132 Edmonds Avenue SITE AREA _1.75 acre BUILDING AREA (gross) : N/A IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° 2 . Air ° 3 . Water ° 4. Plants ° 5. Animals ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° 7 . Environmental Health ° 8. Land & Shoreline Use ° 9. Housing ° 10. Aesthetics ° 11. Light & Glare ° 12. Recreation ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° 14. Transportation ° 15. Public Services ° 16. Utilities ° COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF- 034-90 APPLICATION NO(S) . : R-034-90 PROPONENT: George J. Xenos PROJECT TITLE: Rodgers Rezone BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks to reclassify a 1.75 acre parcel from R-1, Single-Family Use, to R-3 , Medium Density Multi-Family Use, consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The property is currently developed with a single-family home and accessory buildings, which will be demolished if reclassification is achieved, and the property will be then be developed with a multi-family complex; a conceptual site plan has been provided for information only. LOCATION: 1132 Edmonds Avenue N.E. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 5/4/90 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON APRIL 18, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED DATE SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 -..._ . ,-. . ' ,• '. . . • ,.. • • . . . . , . . • ,e. • . . „ . . . • , . . ,. • •. . . , • . . . . . • . .. • •. . . . . . . . . . . . . ' . , . , . . . . . , . . • . ' ' . • . . . . , . '. . _ .. . , • • ' • . • . . . . . . . .. • . _ M, .... .: ," "'.•-,'.. ,. ,••,%.. lIi !1grI°• 11"I 11 1I.515g,I ',t-'I-r I I I,.. . :1:„:.•—.,...-'.;I.'' •1E1O P,,.'1O1.O... .:;UO..'.,,-,,,'.::„,'i..•'..','!.1•:•.".1I11 7• 71!-.c•. ;'.•..:.• 118 1 •1111 11.1 1i 1 1 ?ITT 14 st . 4 1 1 31 ;II , ill.'' . / • , 11 - 1 - ' i "--'. • XII 1 I... „ ..,„,„;-• ..., „, .„,.... . , - IN.„,.. . - • .iti- ••••••.-... iiiiiiii Ai .- , : .--,7:.,iilliE ..... .....' ' ,• - . . I• p..AI LAI ••• '' 4:1-?z•-• - •••••,'., ;'-',Z-' rs' si ::. 41 ... '.... . '..: :: •ja i '44'.?---. fal I ;117• 4iii, ' ,.:'si, '-' .,,,, ..::-. • . '',•'''. gy,,-, ..,,-.,,l'•:',..,-..-.,.... . , ' °1. . , .,:,'.: 1 i • iii 1:1:1:4:--'''' *.''' •,.'''''f..;',',:"''';'••1"1 I '• • ''`''' '.' - ' • ••''', ' ri.•.!',, _'...,::.••, ...:-. ,' • . •• a. '''D-. '- ''''',' ''...-''' S.4 ••' ''..%.' ''..;7- • • • • ..41160": ,,,,.,. ,,,, . g '." '.' .'I'4 "........."..., . . 1.-,,-: - • '• •......, .. .:.::,. „.:.,:.---,:l...,-; • , ; P . - , ..• — itt:ptoustft---- , -.., .• . . . , . • . . .. . ., 5• • .g .1 .1 1 1 -t .. -,,?0,.,;.: _,., ••...•t.,(: r-'-' , ,:i--: , . . 1 r-i. • - ,........, .8n 1 '. . '' II . 4 . ' . •:' 1:',C•C 14:44•‘ ...', ' .: '.5•-.':;,',I•v.:., 311...„.41111,..:•:..,.......t.,. :"..'•::, . : • 8 " cif , trifi . . ..-. II— - „ ,. • • . •. .. , . . . , .: • , , • 1• , ... ..: , • . : ., . . . - A • . . . . . . . . . , . • . . . • ,' , . . , . • • . I .. . . . . , I . . •, , . • , . • • , .. • , • .• ' . .. • a, . . . .. .„...,..., „,. ' . •• ' \ •:', \ t , . • t. 'It\030% 1 1 . . , 1 • . N ' ' ...41R.et. .-taper le.P.J.4..,.....-... , . . , 1 ••••.•• . ,... 1::: : : '..•• . . \ i..1 1 ....:..L........:-.7,--,',,,:,,-;7'.,. .A.:::L• :„.. -—-.._. .-----.— ,•• .• , , . it] :,..._,—A,. ..., _ 1 .._:•.. . • 1. . ', ' —-,•\-,•, • • . . :- ':•.. ''.' ..--•-•'• •'"-. , - ,--•. . . ..ts ' ''. •i I . , . . - . , . ,.. I 1111 . ;I' ': 1 ,• .. ---. . . •,‘ . .., ‘ \ i $ 1 1 , so i $\ m -. ; • 0 .. , •• ••. ;i.•,, • 1 563 ',/). . .-, " • • - ', ••' •. , '' , • Han • is. . ' -.•; • '...r• .. . . '...:- . , •.•..V•:: • v` ' :- -,,. . ) •. g • 1 6 i l' .., I IIWI I* 0 ,• i ' ' • ' \'''-:' ' •—,-;:.::'—' • ,,‘ • .d, \\‘..... ,,. . • ... ..„ „. • 1 . ' g a f 1 ". , •-•.: .• .36 `. :',.......; , . ! i".. . ', ' i • \ t i • ,, \441..„„ -4. „ um,miummizer.. • . t , S •N • . . t 1 ' 1 , 1 ' \ ' . ''' .. • . 1 . . L7L700/100 .. HIM '2 : ,... . -'1 i • zi. ' • 9 • . g . I 1 • ‘1-17-1I, :- .. ''`•11,'- '' '' - S. • et.,1 . • ' 3.. '''''' -'' . ::'''' •I.I, 0 ;1 i. '-'''",1' ki r.""-- ., ''''- -- , - P . • .., 7-.>,„ , 4: A 1 • i ..1 ''. ' - . .,-,.. . B.' ' . - • 11 *. ,(-NN !: ' . . • E - ' . 14 NI••• - . .. . .. • ''i.- (.. /- . . , . . . . .... .... •.‘,1 r-.- -. r,.... \ . • ., .!.,„4\;, .. .,..,,,, I - - . • --• M itt -- - .. ...--. rap.-.--.-:*.'=.,:- 7,- , ,., . i''''- *- .il '. l'.-- • i't • . .t ‘ -,.. . 's: i ! \ , —. ci- 111:11111 ' •'-'5 ' . . • • • , 1 ,..,. —7— --,- . g, •. t .... 111 •• . . ' ' ........._. ___ ..--• ' - - '•--__" \ i -- _ ..1,_ , 411 • : •-- .• • - ::lialle/-Ere,frgrg - .Z;o•-•,atue. 1r ' f --k • ; •, :g ot , .. G ' ,- • • . tV4 4 k \ • ..1-' • . • • 4 1 , , • , . • 1 . . , . . . i • ,.., I — PROPOSED 41.LIMY APAIM041 COWIZIC • I RIVISIONS 1 ' - c pot MICHAEtkettklitt 110.. , . . ...- 5.4 1 B14 --':Retrot4,vvAiletortott:- .1.m r Art 1'V ROBERT WELLS&ASSOCIATES,.ARCHITECTS law • 1 / • 11416 SLATER MIL HE • KIRKLAND,• INARHINN2014:ii:NOW • MOD INS•07(10 t ' MAR 16 1990 _ . - sr- . .. ... .. .. . . . . . PROPERTY DEVELOPfEf1T AffOC . LAND CONSULTANTS George J. Xenos 1616 - 156th NE 44115 (206) 747- 1260 Bel levue, Wa. 98008 0'Ac March 29 , 1990 Op4A% R Ms . Lenora Blauman © 1991 City of Renton41 Senior Planner 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Wa. 98055 RE: Rodgers Rezone, 1132 Edmonds Avenue N.E. . • Dear Ms . Blauman: Enclosed are the conceptual site plan and the geotechnical engineer- ing report which you sugested that we submit in regards to the above mentione reclassification. In your review of our application, please keep in mind that these plans are concepual in nature and are subject to change. Should you need any addition information, please feel free to notify me. • 'Sincerely, • (A/."--1)26s-& George J. Xen s • e? "`-.i 1• SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION AND GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT EDMONDS AVE. APARTMENTS Renton, Washington PREPARED FOR Mr. George Xenos PROJECT NO. 8912-21G MARCH 23, 1990 ASSOCIATED Ira! EARTH SCIENCES, INC � Waft 911 -5thAvenue,Sur'V=� � 4� ' i,WA98033 2616) 827-7701 MAR 3 0 1990 C EN SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION AND GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT EDMONDS AVENUE APARTMENTS 1132 EDMONDS AVENUE NE RENTON, WASHINGTON March 20, 1990 Project No. 8912-21G I. PROJECT AND SITE CONDITIONS 1.0 INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of our subsurface exploration and _ geotechnical engineering study for the proposed apartment complex on Edmonds Avenue in Renton, Washington. The proposed building ' s I_ approximate locations and approximate locations of the explorations accomplished for this study are presented on the Site and Exploration Plan, Figure 1. In the event that any changes in the nature , design or location of the structure is planned , the conclusions and recommendations contained in this report should be reviewed and modified, or verified, as necessary. 1.1 Purpose and Scope The purpose of this study was to . provide subsurface data to be utilized in the design and development of the above mentioned project . Our study included excavation of exploration pits and performing geologic studies to assess the type , thickness , distribution and physical properties of the subsurface sediments and shallow ground water conditions . Engineering studies were also conducted to determine the type of suitable foundation, allowable bearing pressures , anticipated settlements, lateral wall pressures , and drainage considerations . This report summarizes our current field work and offers development recommendations based on our present understanding of the project. 1 . 2 Authorization Written authorization to proceed with this study was granted by Mr. George Xenos on December 19 , 1989. Our study was accomplished in general accordance with our scope of work letter dated December 11 , 1989 . This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Mr. iT Xenos , and his agents , for specific application to this project . Within the limitations of scope, schedule and budget, our services have been performed in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering and engineering geology practices in effect I,_ in this area at the time our report was prepared . No other warranty, expressed or implied is made. Our observations , findings , and opinions are a means to identify and reduce the inherent risks to the owner. 2.0 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION This report was completed with an understanding of the project based on design drawings prepared by Robert Wells & Associates dated February 26 , 1990 , and a topographic survey performed by Baima & Holmberg, Inc. , dated November 3, 1989. Present plans call for the construction of four, multi-family apartment buildings (Figure 1) . It is our understanding that the structures will be 3 stories in height, utilize wood-frame construction, and contain a total of 42 housing units . Onsite parking will be provided adjacent to the buildings . Crawl space type construction will be used for floor support. Proposed finished floor elevations are indicated in Figure 1 . The property was bordered to the west by Edmonds Avenue NE, to the north by existing apartment buildings, to the east by a residential lot , and to the south by a commercial building. Topographically, the site is situated on the western edge of a glaciated highland which loses elevation to the west to form a portion of the southeastern bank for Lake Washington. Vegetation on the western 3/4 of the site generally consisted of yard grasses with scattered trees . The eastern 1/4 of the site contained dense, alder brush. 3.0 SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION Our field study included excavating a series of exploration pits to gain subsurface information about the site. The various types of sediments as well as the depths where characteristics of the sediments changed are indicated on the exploration logs presented in the Appendix. The depths indicated on the logs where conditions changed may represent gradational variations between sediment types in the field. Our explorations were approximately located in the field by measuring from known site features shown on a topographic survey prepared by Baima & Holmberg, Inc. dated November 3 , 1989 . The conclusions and recommendations presented in this report are based on the 9 exploration pits completed for this study and visual reconnaissance of the site . The number, location, and depth of the explorations were completed within site and budgetary constraints. Because of the nature of exploratory work below ground , extrapolation of subsurface conditions between field explorations is necessary. It should be noted that differing subsurface conditions may sometimes be present due to the random nature of deposition and the alteration of topography by past grading and/or filling. The nature and extent of any variations between the field explorations 2 r I may not become full evident until construction. If variations are observed at that time, it may be necessary to reevaluate specific recommendations in this report andmake appropriate changes. 3.1 Exploration Pits Exploration pits were excavated with a subcontracted, rubber-tired backhoe . The pits permitted direct , visual observation of subsurface conditions . Materials encountered in the exploration pits were studied and classified in the field by a geologist from our firm. All exploration pits were backfilled immediately after examination and logging. Selected samples were then transported to our laboratory for further visual classification and testing, as necessary. 4. 0 STRATIGRAPHY The 9 exploration pits penetrated between 3 to 14 feet below ground surface. In general , 4 stratigraphic units were encountered. These units are described below from oldest to youngest. The oldest and lowermost unit encountered on the site (Unit 1) was observed in EP-1 , EP-6 and EP-9 and consisted of dense, moist to wet, brown, highly oxidized in zones, slightly micaceous, fine to medium sand. In EP-1 , Unit 1 was noted to be slightly silty. Unit 1 was encountered approximately 7-1/2 to 13 feet below ground surface and extended below the termination depth of the exploration pits. This unit is interpreted to be Vashon advance sediments which were deposited in a glaciolacustrine (glacial-lake) environment prior to the occupation of the Vashon age glacier in the region. The Vashon ice sheet occupied the Puget Sound region 12 , 500 to 15 , 000 years before present and was the last major glaciation in this area . During its southern advance into the region, the ice sheet blocked the northern drainage ways diverting them southward to form a glacial lake and deposited the observed sand unit. These sediments were subsequently overridden and glacially consolidated by the advancing Vashon ice sheet. Unit 2 was observed in all the exploration pits except EP-7 which was terminated due to the presence of utilities. Unit 2 sediments were comprised of dense to very dense , moist , brown , unsorted, gravelly, silty to slightly silty, fine to coarse sand with cobbles (till) . In some areas , this unit was observed to become sandier with depth. The upper surface of Unit 2 was observed approximately 3 to 4-1/2 feet below existing ground surface and, where a bottom contact was noted in EP-1 , EP-6 and EP-9, Unit 2 was 4-1/2 to 8-1/2 feet thick. In the remaining exploration pits, this unit extended below the termination depth of the explorations. In EP-1 , a 1-1/2 layer of gravelly sand was observed in the lower portion of Unit 2. {r In some areas , the upper 2 to 2-1/2 feet of this material was noted to be wet, oxidized, and in a less dense condition due to the 3 effects of weathering. In EP-9 , the contact between Unit 1 and 2 appears to be dipping to the east ; however , because of the stratigraphic contacts being underwater and not directly observed, the inclination of these units is inferred. Unit 2 sediments are interpreted to be Vashon lodgement till . These sediments accumulated at the base of the advancing Vashon age glacier. As a result, these sediments have been consolidated into a material possessing high strength and low compressibility characteristics . Because the lodgement till was deposited by the glacier as a veneer of sediments over the preexisting terrain , localized variations in thickness may occur. Unit 3 was encountered in EP-2, EP-3, EP-4, EP-5, EP-8 and EP-9 , and consisted of loose, becoming medium dense in EP-5 , wet to saturated, brown, oxidized, gravelly, silty, fine to coarse sand and silty, fine to medium sand with scattered gravel . Minor organics were observed in some areas. This unit was observed approximately 1/2 to 1-1/2 feet below existing ground surface and was roughly 1-1/2 to. 3 feet thick. This unit is interpreted to be Vashon recessional sediments which accumulated during the northern retreat of the ice sheet from this area. These Vashon recessional deposits may have been deposited contemporaneous to the recessional delta sediments located to the north of the site which accumulated as a result of outwash streams down May Creek Valley. Fill soil (material not naturally placed) , Unit 4 , was observed in EP-1 , EP-6 and EP-7 . This material consisted of loose , moist to wet, brown oxidized, silty, fine to coarse sand with organics. The fill appears to be the result of site grading for the existing residence . Consequently, fill may be present in other areas in association with the onsite structures. In EP-7 , the exploration pit was terminated at 3 feet in fill soils due to the presence of utilities. 5.0 HYDROLOGY Rapid ground water seepages were encountered in all of our exploration pits during the time of our field work. The seepages were rapid, causing standing water in the exploration pit after a few minutes. In general , the majority of these seepages are attributed to a regional perched ground water table. A perched ground water table forms when surface water infiltrates down through permeable sediments, such as the fill and recessional deposits (Units 4 and 3) , and becomes perched atop the relatively impermeable lodgement till (Unit 2 ) . In addition , rapid seepage was also observed originating from the gravel lens layer at the base of the lodgement till in EP-1 . • Shallow puddles of standing water were also present on the site . This standing water appears to have been caused by a recent interval of heavy rains. It should be noted that surface and ground water conditions may fluctuate due to variations in. rainfall or time of the year. • • • • 5 March 20, 1990 Project No. 8912-21G II. DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS 6 .0 INTRODUCTION Our exploration indicated that, from a geotechnical standpoint, the parcel is suitable for the proposed development if the recommendations outlined in this report are properly followed. The bearing stratum, consisting of dense lodgement till , observed approximately 3 to 7 feet below existing ground surface , will be capable of providing support for the proposed structures. Based on. the proposed finished floor elevations , this will require cuts up to 7 feet in height to attain the desired grades for the structures . In addition , due to the potential for a high level of perched ground water on the site, an interceptor drain system is recommended along the eastern and northern property lines. 7 . 0 SITE PREPARATION AND STRUCTURAL FILL Old foundations presently on the site which are under building areas or not part of future plans should be removed. Any buried utilities should be removed or relocated if they are under building areas . The resulting depressions should be backfilled with structural fill placed in loose, 8-inch lifts with each lift compacted to 95 percent of the Modified Proctor Maximum Density using ASTM:D 1557 as the standard. If the subgrade contains too much moisture , adequate recompaction may be difficult or impossible to obtain and should probably not be attempted. In lieu of recompaction, the area to receive fill should be blanketed with washed rock or quarry spalls to act as a capillary break between the structural fill and the wet subgrade. Site preparation of planned building areas should include removal of all trees , brush , debris and any other deleterious material . Additionally, the upper organic topsoil should be removed and the remaining roots grubbed. Areas where loose surficial soils exist due to grubbing operations should be considered as fill to the depth of disturbance and treated as recommended above for structural fill placement. The loose sands and fill should be stripped down to the underlying, non-weathered , dense lodgement till . This depth was observed approximately 3 to 7 feet below existing ground surface in our exploration pits. The upper 12 inches of the exposed soils should then be recompacted to 90 percent of ASTM:D 1557 . If organic materials are exposed, they should be further overexcavated to bearing or we should be contacted to provide additional recommendations. If overexcavated to bearing , the area should then be backfilled to grade with structural fill as discussed previously. 6 The onsite soils contain a high percentage of fine-grained material which makes them moisture-sensitive and subject to disturbance when wet . The contractor must use care during site preparation and excavation operations so that the underlying soils are not softened. If disturbance occurs, the softened soils should be removed and the area brought to grade with structural fill. All proposed rockeries should follow the City of Renton standards. 8 .0 FOUNDATIONS Based on the information obtained in the exploration pits , the older underlying advance sands (Unit 1) will not be encountered during foundation placement. However,. the lodgement till layer (Unit 2) was observed to vary in thickness , and a potential risk exists that the advance sand unit may be encountered . This sand unit is generally more permeable than the overlying lodgement till layer and may be water bearing, as evidenced in EP-1. If this advance sand unit is encountered, we should be notified to review or modify our foundation recommendations. Spread footings may be used for building support when founded on ' dense, non-weathered lodgement till , observed in our exploration pits approximately 3 to 7 feet below existing ground surface. We recommend that an allowable bearing pressure of 3000 pounds per square foot (psf) be utilized for design purposes, including both dead and live loads . An increase of one-third may be used for short-term wind or seismic loading. Perimeter footings should be buried at least 18 inches into the surrounding soil for frost protection ; interior footings require only 12 inches burial . However, all footings must penetrate to the prescribed bearing stratum and no footing should be founded in or above loose, organic, !_ or existing fill soils . In addition, all footings should have a minimum width of 18 inches for 3-story structures. It should be noted that the area bounded by lines extending downward at 1H:1V (horizontal:vertical) from any footing must not intersect another footing, rockery, or intersect a filled area which has not been compacted to at least 95 percent of ASTM:D 1557 . In addition, a 1 . 5H: 1V line extending downward from any footing must not daylight , or sloughing or raveling may eventually undermine the footing. Thus, footings should not be placed near the edge of steps or cuts in the bearing soils . Anticipated settlement of footings founded on the dense lodgement till should be on the order of 1 inch. However, disturbed soil not removed from footing excavations prior to footing placement could result in increased settlements . All footing areas must be inspected by Associated Earth Sciences , Inc. prior to placing concrete to verify that the design bearing capacity of the soils has been attained and that construction conforms with the recommendations contained in this report. Such inspections may be required by the governing municipality. Perimeter footing drains should be provided as discussed under the section on Drainage Considerations. 9. 0 LATERAL WALL PRESSURES All backfill behind walls or around foundation units should be placed as per our recommendations for structural fill , and as described in this section of the report. Backfilled walls which are free to yield laterally at least 0.1 percent of their height, may be designed using an equivalent fluid equal to 40 pounds per cubic foot (pcf) . Fully restrained rigid walls which cannot yield should be designed for an equivalent fluid of 55 pcf. If parking areas are adjacent to walls, a surcharge equivalent to 2 feet of soil should be added to the wall height in determining lateral design forces . The lateral pressures presented above are based on the conditions of a uniform , horizontal backfill consisting of onsite , silty sand compacted to 90 percent of ASTM: D 1557 . A higher degree of compaction is not recommended as this will increase the pressure acting on the wall . Surcharges from adjacent footings , heavy construction equipment, or sloping ground must be added to the above values . If the base of a rockery is within a 1H:1V line extending up from the bottom of a footing, it will surcharge the wall . We should be contacted to determine actual wall pressures if this is the case . Perimeter footing drains should be provided for all retaining walls as discussed under the section on Drainage Considerations. It is imperative that proper drainage be provided so that hydrostatic pressures do not develop against the wall . This would involve installation of a 1 foot wide blanket drain for the full wall height using imported , washed gravel against •the walls or approved drainage boards . 10.0 DRAINAGE CONSIDERATIONS At the site, the upper, loose to medium dense sands and fill , accept water quite readily, and naturally disperse it downslope . The underlying, non-weathered, lodgement till is relatively impermeable and water will tend to perch atop this stratum . Additionally, traffic across these soils when they are damp or wet will result in disturbance of the otherwise firm stratum. Therefore, prior to site work and construction, the contractor should be prepared to provide drainage as necessary. It is our understanding that a crawl space type construction will be used for floor support . It is our understanding that the crawl space will be backfilled to within 4 feet of the finished floor elevation. The soil below the floor system should be covered with an impervious moisture barrier to reduce dampness . 8 • All retaining and footing walls should be provided with a drain at the footing elevation. Drains should consist of rigid, perforated PVC pipe surrounded by washed pea gravel (see attached Wall/Footing Drain Detail) . The level of the perforations in the pipe should be set 2 inches below the bottom of the footing at all locations and the drains should be constructed with sufficient gradient to allow gravity discharge away from the building . In addition , all retaining walls should be lined with a minimum 12-inch thick washed gravel blanket provided over the full height of the wall , and, which ties into the footing drain. Roof and surface runoff should not discharge into the footing drain system but should be handled by a separate , rigid tightline drain. In planning, exterior grades adjacent to walls should be sloped downward away from the structure to achieve surface drainage. 10 .1 Interceptor Drain Due to the near-surface impermeable till layer, and the fact that the site slopes to the southwest, we recommend that an interceptor drain be installed along the north and east sides of the property prior to beginning site work. The drain should consist of an 18 inch wide trench which is excavated a minimum of 1 foot into the unweathered till . A rigid , perforated PVC pipe should be placed near the bottom of the trench, embedded in washed drain rock. In addition, the pipe should have sufficient slope to drain by gravity. 11 .0 PROJECT DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION MONITORING We are available to provide additional geotechnical consultation as the project design develops and possibly changes from that upon which this report is based. We recommend that Associated Earth Sciences , Inc. , perform a geotechnical review of the plans prior to final design completion. In this way, our earthwork and foundation recommendations may be properly interpreted and implemented in the design. We are also available to provide geotechnical engineering and monitoring services during construction. The integrity of the foundation depends on proper site preparation and construction procedures . In addition, engineering decisions may have to be made in the field in the event that variations in subsurface conditions become apparent. 9 We have enjoyed working with you on this study and are confident that these recommendations will aid in the successful completion of your project. If you should have any questions, or require further assistance, please do not hesitate to call . Sincerely, ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. 11 A. Wheeler, Geologist cot . L O 01 B0 -e. c,Q' E WA4, c<3 l *or 46i cit 1111:4. �a Gary T. bdell , P.E. , P.G. % °IFS FC1s7EG\��`�'���`� S'1QNAL EN 0l1i ' I JAW/lb A912-21G DK2/10/90 lb 1•0 • FIGURE 1: SITE AND EXPLORATION PLAN - EDMONDS AVENUE APARTMENTS J • . • • 40 [ I uL I r I \,N\ Proposed I / I I • I 1 Building 0 EP-1I ���\ FF 318. I REP-3 Proposed parking I Property Line N\.\ rockery , vEP-2 I I I • • ````\ ' I Propose wilding I \ p,J Proposed Parking FF 33 • \ I I I i �e I I i \ y Gravel T 7 1 \ a , / I I I I Interceptor Drain a \ � II Z _—_ —___ O I-- ...\ , , •_ I -a '1 \ Existing1 r ; Existing ( L4EP-4 --- - _-�; ) ,..-----__ rJL _ W I I "'wo I I ShedI \. EP-7 0 I I - I EXPLANATION Porch J I ' 0 EP-1 Exploration Pit IRockery i I I Approximate Location II Proposed Parking I I . A EP-6 L_ ) parking I Proposed I 1 P wa Il I Proposed Building Building o FF 328 I1II FF 314 I I(III • I c r I 1 vEP-9 1 \ I l 0 20 40 I - . Scale in Feeti •\ I .. vEP-5 1 \ I MARCH 1990�1 ,o \ ._ J \ PROJECT NO. 8912-21G\ _ \ ASSOCIATED ED% EARTH, _ ��_ __ ZAS11- SCIENCES, INC 903-5th Avenue,Kirkland,Washington 98033 `. - APPENDIX EXPLORATION PIT L OGS NUMBER EP-1 O SEDIMENT DESCRIPTION Topsoil. _ Loose, becoming medium dense at 21' , wet to saturated, brown, oxidized, gravelly, silty, fine to coarse sand. (Fill) 5- _ Dense, moist, brown-grey, gravelly, silty to slightly silty, fine to coarse sand with cobbles. (Lodgement Till) Dense, saturated, brown, silty, gravelly, fine to coarse sand. 10 Dense, moist, brown, highly oxidized in zones, slightly micaceous, silty, fine to medium sand. 15- BOH 132' Note: Rapid seepage 0-41' and 81-10' . Standing water in hole after few minutes. Minor caving 0-42' and 81-10' NUMBER EP-2 0 SEDIMENT DESCRIPTION Topsoil. Loose, wet to saturated, brown, oxidized, gravelly, silty, fine to coarse sand. 5- Dense, moist, brown, gravelly, silty to slightly silty, fine to coarse sand with cobbles. Becoming sandier at .101'. • (Lodgement Till) • . 10— BOH 121' Note: Rapid seepage 0-41' . Standing water in hole after a few 15- minutes. Minor caving 0-41' ASSOCIATED Edmonds Avenue Apartments EARTH 1132 Edmonds Avenue NE SCIENCES, INC Renton, Washington. 8912-21G I Jan.9, 1990 1(704) EXPLORATION PIT LOGS NUMBER EP-3 O SEDIMENT DESCRPTION Topsoil. Loose, wet to saturated, brown, oxidized, gravelly, silty, fine to coarse sand. 5- Dense becoming very dense, moist, brown, gravelly, silty to slightly silty, fine to coarse sand with cobbles. Becoming sandier at 12' . (Lodgement Till) • 10— r B0H 122' Note: Rapid seepage 0-4' . Standing water in hole after few 1 5- minutes. Minor caving 0-3' NUMBER EP-4 0 SEDIMENT DESCRIPTION, Topsoil. Loose, wet to saturated, brown, oxidized, gravelly, silty, fine to coarse sand. 5- Dense, becoming very dense, moist, brown, gravelly, silty to slightly silty, fine to coarse sand with cobbles. (Lodgement Till) .10_ BOH9 Note: Rapid seepage 0-4' . Standing water in hole after few _ minutes. Minor caving 0-3' 15- ASSOCIATED Edmonds Avenue Apartments EARTH 1132 Edmonds Avenue NE SCIENCES, INC Renton, Washington. 8912-21G I Jan.9, 1990 1 40 EXPLORATION PIT LOGS NUMBER EP-5 0 _ SEDIMENT DESCRPTION Topsoil. Loose, becoming medium dense, moist, brown, oxidized, gravelly, silty, fine to coarse sand. 5- Dense to very dense, moist, brown, gravelly, silty to slightly silty, fine to coarse sand with cobbles. (Lodgement Till) 10— - BOH 111' - Note: Rapid seepage 0-4' . Standing water in hole after few minutes. 1 5- Minor caving 0-4' • NUMBER EP-6 0 SEDIMENT DESCRIPTION - Topsoil. Loose, moist to wet, brown, oxidized, fine to medium sand. Containing organic pockets.. (Fill) 5-{ Medium dense, moist to wet, brown, oxidized, gravelly, silty, fine to coarse sand with cobbles. (Weathered Lodgement Till) 1 0-- Dense to very dense, moist, brown, gravelly, silty, fine to coarse -1 sand with cobbles. (Lodgement Till) Dense, moist, brown, highly oxidized in zones, micaceous, fine 1 to medium sand. / 1 5_ ; BOH 14' Note: Minor to moderate-sbgepage 0-6' - Abundant caving ASSOCIATED Edmonds Avenue Apartments EARTH 1132 Edmonds Avenue NE SCIENCES, INC Renton, Washington. _ 8912-21G ' Jan.9, 1990 I( 0) 1 . , EXPLORATION PIT LOGS NUMBER EP-7 O SEDIMENT DESCRPTION Topsoil. Loose, moist to wet, brown, oxidized, silty, fine to coarse sand. Encountered downspout tightlined pipe. (Fill) - BOH 3' 5- Note: Terminated due to prescence of downspout pipe. 10— • 15- . . . NUMBER EP-8 0 SEDIMENT DESCRIPTION Topsoil. Loose, moist to saturated, brown, oxidized, silty, fine to coarse sand with organics. 5- Medium dense, wet, brown, oxidized, gravelly, silty, fine to coarse sand with cobbles. (Weathered Lodgement Till) Dense, moist, brown, gravelly, silty, fine to coarse sand with cobbles. (Lodgement Till) / BOH 71' 1 0— Note: Rapid seepage 0-6' . Standing water in hole after few - minutes. - Abundant caving 0-6' 15- ASSOCIATED Edmonds Avenue Apartments EARTH 1132 Edmonds Avenue NE SCIENCES, INC Renton, Washington. 8912-21G 1 Jan.9, 1990 1(4 i EXPLORATION PIT LOGS NUMBER EP-9 0 _ SEDIMENT DESCRPTION Topsoil. Loose, wet to saturated, brown, oxidized, silty, fine to coarse sane . 5~ Dense, moist, brown, gravelly, silty to slightly silty, fine to coarse sand with cobbles. (Lodgement Till) 1 0— Dense, moist to wet, brown, oxidized, fine to medium sand. BOH 102' Note: Rapid seepage 0-3' . Standing water in hole after few minutes. Moderate caving 0-3' 15- • NUMBER 0 SEDIMENT DESCRIPTION J . - 10- 15- • ASSOCIATED Edmonds Avenue Apartments EARTH 1132 Edmonds Avenue NE SCIENCES, I N C Renton, Washington. 8912-21G I Jan.9,1990 I 4aT ciV"v�A L1:2 ...:m:::.*:; ::P:: :ENT IDEPAFi : ::: :::: ::::::::::::::: :CO::'- IUNTTY.DE ELO 11A MMITTElr::> ::<::<:::::::::::: <> :: >s : ` ;::.:.:;:ii4:::::`NME.NT. .L fit`V(E:W: .O:�>::::::: :: ::::::>:<> :z`:::':< :>::�: >:<':::�:�»::ENV ISO A EPA.15Q ;: ` > > : : 0 :: � ' .::.::.::.;.:::.:.::.;::.;:.::.:.::.;:.::::: .:.:.....:....:::::.:::::.::::::: >:�::T°AFg.R .O APf?L�CA(VT... . ;:::::>;:>;;:>:> :::;:>:;:::<:::<>>:::: GeorgeXenon:>;>:« <:. <.; .. . . •::::.: ::::.::::.: >' FNV.R 0 N M: N :. ':is H LI T' : > 1=:..F.Fk...... i41.> <> :1 ': <::> < ? > > :> : >: ��'n`:::::>: >: t c ass ca o :.:.. ...:... <�:n�F� fttPT[`��N::'� F`PR`>P�� AL <> >>» >A:::>:�f�:>:::rt:,.:.:.eks a o ro ec e ..:..:<.;:.::;. aerie::. arcei :from;R=:1::<:::S.in Ie Family:Use<:to_:::R;3:::;:Multi-Famil ;:Uses:.;:;The: .ropert:;;::::::cur:rently ite::with`: :.,:.:fit.::::f#:::Io i D-v l' `m o es e :: ;:;>::>::>:: >:::de.:e(o.�`ecf witltwo:sin:�I�:farn�.::F�.omes:and..accesso.. .bu..d....9s.....::..:.:::::R:::: ::::.::::::.:::.: .: ::::.-:.: :::: :;:: : ::: >m lti f mil'c gy m l e x::i ::: l nn t t k l c t: future:date':site<-lan a r:oval::is:not:sou ght:: deVP..9P. ..:::::X: o.:::P..e:.:::S:.P.a..:g0.0o. e..l?..a..:?:a:. :::::.....::.:Te:0f::1711.4:P:.:.:. ;:pp:... ::: :.:;:.: ::.::�:�;;;.:.:;:.:g.:<.;:::: � � t:� :.; im ;;: :�<: .:.v<.:r::.>:::.;:::;::.;:;::>:::t:. :�:1::::;�;:: .:::�.:�:;;;;:�;::�::: :itt.� :f�� i�nforrri::ti�:��rioril`s :�:� :< > ::>> �: :::: :z:: �1 : t. h.s.t.4.0..ho...e..e.. .a&• ..6.6t ite. I.an.i .subm....etio....... .....:::.o........::: :: . ..:..-: .:.. :......::.:::: ::>L.>.. ATI(>::N F Pf.3::::P:;:;AL :>>: » I1 .2> •:•:m«n•• Av°n a NorfFieast «> :> » : > > : :>::> ISSUES: Traffic, earth, natural environment DETERMINATION: DNS-M (Please see Recommendations on Page 2) • Hlrl 31st o�• ` 1 1 1 . o Q (a1 I � ^ Icc I - I. t L �JI r La / r l z 11111 as •\il 1..,:°gam I 'k'<s,.. . 1: — N �'s 1' I • �� �s- Co o j. • r ♦X:C —. m ,,s_i____ _r,,.. i.,., -.44 z,. _<.„ x e,./., ,R.: ,, I_ v7(f) 1 .. ♦ o IBC. I CC 1 � 111I cc cc • • EARTH 1. That the applicant, in conjunction with environmental/site plan review for any specific development project, will be required to provide a supplementary soils study to be approved by the Public Works Department to ensure, compatibility of the proposed project—design with theu nderlying_terrairi NATURAL ENVIRONMENT 2. That the applicant, in conjunction with environmental/site plan review for any specific development project, will be required provide a tree retention plan and a landscaping plan to be approved by the Landscape Planner. No tree cutting will be permitted until site plan approval is • achieved and a vegetation _ermit is obtained. TRAFFIC 3. That the applicant, in conjunction with • environmental/site plan review for any specific project, provide a traffic analysis ,for the intersection of Edmonds Avenue/Northeast Sunset Boulevard, to be approved by the Public Works Department and the Police Department,to • ensure that traffic impacts are sufficiently identified and adequate mitigation measures established to provide appropriate levels of service at this intersection, with residential development on this site. NOTE: The conceptual site plan submitted for potential future residential development on this lot has • been reviewed and commented upon by staff. Staff recommends that a specific site plan • include-reduced density, lesssteep_access roads • �for�vehicles and pedestr a s Ian sc g which would serve as a visual amenity and provide a buffer against light and glare, and off-site and on.- site. recreational. amenities. At the time of • development review (environmental and site plan), the applicant will be required to provide mitigation measures to address impacts to public services (e.g., emergency services, schools) and utilities. Additional mitigation measures may also be required to address impacts identified at the time of review of a specific site plan. • .................................................................................................................................................................................................... .................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................ ............ ............................................................................................................................. ..................................................................... ..................................................................................................................................................................................................... , ....................................................................................................................... .. ........... .......................................... . ............... ................................................................................................................................ .. .. ............ ......... . ... ............................. ...................................................................................................................................... . ..................................... .... .... .......... ...................................................................................................................................................................................... ............. ...... ..... ...... ................... ..... ................................ ...... ................ ............................ ... ..... ...... ..... ...................... ... ... ..... 1. Whether environmental impacts anticipated to occur in conjunction with the proposed reclassification have been adequately identified and addressed? a. Earth Impacts: A geotechnical study was provided for this site. The subject property is reported to include sandy and loamy soils; some fill has been placed on the site. Portions of the site are sloped to approximately 20 percent. There is subterranean water attributed to a perched ground water table. Additional filling and grading can be accommodated to support new development; additional studies are recommended in conjunction with review of specific development for this site to ensure compatibility of the design with the underlying terrain. Mitigation Measures: That the applicant provide a supplementary soils study in conjunction with site plan review for specific development to ensure compatibility with the underlying terrain. • EnvironmeQtal Review Committee Staff Report dodgers Rezone May 23, 1990 'age 3 Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance 4-6; Mining, Excavation and Grading Ordinance (4-10). b. Housing Impacts: The subject property is located in Northeast Renton, an area which is generally considered to be desirable for multi-family use under the City's Comprehensive Plan. The site, if developed with apartment units, would offer an appropriate transitional use between low-density multi-family properties to the east and potential/existing commercial properties to the west. The two single-family homes now on the parcel would need to be removed from the site to accommodate new housing. Public services and infrastructure are generally available to serve the site -- see Sections 1.c and 1.e below for additional discussion. Mitigation Measures: None are required in conjunction with reclassification. Conditions will be required with mandated environmental/site plan review for future multi-family development. Policy Nexus: Not applicable. c. Traffic Impacts: The proposed action, a non-project reclassification, will not result in traffic impacts to the site or the local roadways, however, such impacts would be expected in conjunction with future development of the site. The Comprehensive Plan reports that area right-of-ways can support postulated traffic from allowed developments, including multi-family development on the subject site. With present types/density. of development, levels of service on nearby arterials (Edmonds Avenue, Monroe Avenue, Northeast 12th Street and Sunset Boulevard) range from acceptable to marginal. As a result, staff will recommend a traffic study at the time of mandated environmental/site plan review for future multi- family development. Mitigation Measures: That the applicant provide a traffic analysis for the intersection of Edmonds Avenue/Northeast Sunset Boulevard in conjunction with environmental/site plan review for a specific project to ensure that adequate levels of service are available, or can be made available through mitigation, with the proposed development. Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance (4-6); Streets and Arterials Plan. d. Natural Environment Impacts: A tree inventory depicts several significant trees on the subject property. The proposed non-project reclassification will not affect that inventory. However, a tree retention plan, together with a landscaping plan, and a tree cutting permit will be required in conjunction with environmental/site plan review for future development. Mitigation Measures: That the applicant provide a tree retention plan and a landscaping plan in conjunction with environmental/site plan review for future development, to be approved by the Landscape Planner. No tree cutting will be permitted until the site plan approval is obtained and a vegetation permit is approved. Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance (4-6); Land Clearing and Tree Cutting Ordinance (4-9); Landscaping Ordinance (4-31-34). e. Public Services 1. Emergency Services Impacts: No impacts to police and fire services are anticipated from the proposed reclassification; adequate resources are anticipated to be available to serve the site with multi-family residential development. r Environmental Review Committee Staff Report . • Rodgers Rezone May 2,3, 1990 Page 4 Mitigation Measures: None required in conjunction with the non-project reclassification; measures may be ' required in conjunction with development'review. Policy Nexus: Not applicable. • 2. Storm Water Impacts: No impacts to storm water management are anticipated from the proposed non-project classification. A storm water management system which addresses site terrain and protects neighboring properties will need to be provided in conjunction with development review. • • Mitigation Measures: None required in conjunction with the non-project • reclassification; measures will be required 'in conjunction with • development review. Policy Nexus: Not applicable. • 3. Utilities Impacts: No impacts to utilities systems are expected from the proposed non-project reclassification. A utilities connection plan and 'system improvement fees will be required at the time of site plan review. Mitigation Measures: None required in conjunction with the non-project reclassification; measures will be required in conjunction with development review. • • Policy Nexus: 4. Recreation • • Impacts: No recreation impacts are anticipated from the proposed non- • - project classification. . A recreation plan which provides on-site improvements and contributes to community recreation facilities will need to be provided in conjunction with development review. . 'Mitigation Measures: None required in conjunction with the non-project reclassification; direct on-site improvements and a fair share contribution to off-site improvements will be required with development review. Policy Nexus: Not applicable. • 5. Schools • Impacts: No impacts to the school system are anticipated from the • proposed non-project classification. At the time of development, the City and the applicant will need to work with the Renton School District to ensure that school-aged children anticipated to live on the site can be accommodated in district institutions. Mitigation Measures: None required in conjunction with the non-project reclassification; at the time of site plan review, allowed project density will be correlated to the ability of the School District to accommodate additional students. • Policy Nexus: Not applicable. • D. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS: •::>�:'��:<<:::'�>::'>:::::�� �::>� : ::::::�::: >?:;:<::;: >: ::�:�:::t>>:>':> •:.:`:.:<•'n ttie o c . ese c miff �d tn..}� nl._i 9 :. ::�:::.-:: :::• .-:::.::..-::::: : ::.:':- ::::::-.::: ::::::.,:,::::::: ..:::�;.•:.: ::::::.:.:.::::::::::::.:::::::sub..............e................. .............9 Q.,..a.........a.a........ . ...........:........._...........:.::.::.:..:..::.:,.:...:..:....::..:,.:..:.:: ............ ................ .._. ....... .....:.::.::::::.�:..:,....::::..:..:: ( ... • f'� :r:: :::: i:i.i.:: ::a:':i i:::$?.'•isi:: ::ti: ::::'ign:;:':1if?�Yi�i ''S�:i��1:iM':aC�'.fi::':iili4il'.:I!;F�4i�lii!Fi43fii�']F4 ...� ......yy.��.��....{�y�..... ,............. ....... .... .................:...........:.. ':r'�'�.�':ae�Cai :::•::::`•:.`}%%:':;�:::;isi:'r::<::::::;:}:;::: ::::;,•,:#::i ::: : :;. '':•.'r :r:•»>;;•:::5::;;.::;: :• :::.• ::•: .::>'>::::::::: :::'issr'•<''.•:::::is:> z� ::::» <:: :: � :»:>:<:' . '•• �I:�;�s':':::A�It�..I�:•Is:�kRY.... ................ i :::.:......:.:.... ... •'.M+. .•�i-:fi•::::::.l:::.:::::::.:::..•:.:::::•::.::::.::..::::::.:::.:.::•:?ram. ....•M..�. .. •j'� .. �i^ .... .:::.:.::::.::::...!:.::.::.:::::::::...::::::.�::::::::.1>.:.:.:::•:•::::•::::::.�::::. ..::::.:.. ..:: :.:` ,:> ':•,::'::::t'.»:t� •..:y:':;• ;;';yi::..:.:::•`::':::::'•'•..'�::3:::: <j':::::::i::::::::::':::::.'.`•::::::::.:t:`':' ' :: :` • `'.;;. .. .........may.y yty��y •�ca y}�•c•. y+..�y�y#:• :.....::::••.�}{�•y..:.: .:::: •...:..:', N�` .:{•+�•.:t.::.::.:::.:;:.;:.:•.:::::::r::..::.>':::::..:::.....::.::•::::::::::::::::::.:::::::;::::5:::::::;::::::::::.:.:t::i•:::::;:.:: •.::.:�:::::::::. .�#�S.'1•.�.t•./r.•15.�3:!��:.isl ..:•�£3?w;r; .J,;. ;#...i,:•.:.�::.:, tw;.�. .::.��: .::: i .:::::::: .r. :.:::.::::•:::•..::::.:......:............................ .............:. iii ': : :: 3i:::.E�}{ '::.ryi� y�+��. ;:':.t'��yy::::::,,��1y. ..::.: .y'�y1•:: .:'t� ::t';F r:•:.:•:•:::A' ': : :Y.: ,4 •.r•:•••ag AS':w':::::::::4r�':::::: '�'a ':::• FR • .'': ::.::•:•::.::•::•::•:'•:t•::••:: :.:.:...:...,..;y.,; :''::::::: '.•;:::t.:::::::::;•:::..'::'o;%:':::,a'.'i' :;:.::.:..:'.::,,.:•,::.; i�•.'. :::::i::•"�:%:::i:::::.i:,•. .;:;::';::: ;r•:: ;:'.:.::.....:.;•:.::.t:.•;i i.::..:yy.��.t.�;.:�}y:yy.:::::��•'"'•.::::'::i:::' •.qQ':•"•:'.::.•:`•.'�. ,...��.{.yy.: :: :;...::::•. ::.::.:::: yy,�++!4�#}..�µ ,1y�:g':: {.�µ Sy r }y ry 3�:: 4 y.a t:ity ::<•: •#>om•:R lt':::::: 'n4% : . a: 4:54F : •::::.:::i :::•::::;: :::::'ii::::::.:i5 ':f..•...'M• •—:..?474r +...... ;:4+: fi•M::::: :i::: ::::iM.'.:h. : ::::.:!iF:4%� i:r.,•:: >F¢:;Y,,:::,. i,: •..: :...... ... ................ .. .. . ................. .......... .... 7�y G``[y:•�y: '•�1�. .',{[�♦q'yN'{..1� 17 : '�"r:•P mt. . .:::::':i §To •:::'TT04:••::.ili} ijyi; Z7 '.::: .:::::::'I.Y. :11 t.��r,1�}• v�':::::::::::::.::::::::::. • •::i::'..::;F,.F. .;,Y,.;W;.�� ..,�1,^, ...:::.: � :: �Y.•;•.T.!•y::::: ::� � ..•::.�.�..:.:. •. ::.:::::::: ••:.:•..::::. y.:: v: ..�::•.�:r•.::.::::::::::.•.•��•.•r ••.� :::: y•:.:.•y..::n:y:.+l:•::•.gin::4y.::.r•::. : •.::..r.:::A�•.:::n::::.�:.:: n,•:N:. :••:.�:::..:X::. .::: •.�:::•.::•:::v.�...:v:..::V:•.. w::...::..:.:::::•:••v. v.w.•. •.•.•.:.:....:.:•. . :::..::::::•.::.•::::••.:•:::::•::,. ....::.:.:::::::•.�::••::r•...:::: •.:..:.:.�:.::.:•::.y y., .:•::.:..:..:::• .:•y:.y.r.:;::. ••.; •.:>:::•:.:: ::•:: ": ':�:.;,..;:•::.;i:' •%•::::::.•::•:.r; .... •:tit. ...: ...:• •.:�•:::: :.. "�i•.:: :t•>; :.. ......, ..:..;...;,,,..i,t...;t•.t•••::.: .: ...:• •.:• ::•;: ::•.::::::::::;•. • ..::'::i:':::::::::.:: .: : :::: . ..:t•: .:::•: .;;. ...4 ta:•:F:A••M .:•.�:.g.l•t .:.. . . g.A%Y. .gp,r•. . •:...N4.9t dfhY:F*:t�aF.,t h•h ?:i:.r',.M.::1::: '::`: ::::':•::.t :.::: ':+•.•rr•:'::. '::i:'rr••::> .:.:. . ...: ... .... .:4:x>+.:.,:::•: ...:. :..:........ .::: is .:::. ... ..' ....::•:.is'.::::.:....• .. :,i ... .. r ::.' :::..::::::...::::.::::.�:':: ..... .. ...........:..:..:::::............... .......:::.. :t .a: .'':::site:::: •last:i ...::::::s�a.bxa,:f ed: r ::,:::i>:�:::::::,:•i::::i>:::>:<:>•':•. ':`:.. .,E:?::::`:``<# `':"'.`':i"•"<::5....:::`.. :`•°z,:,if:'': :%::�i:; >: :•><:;:::: ' ::':`: i::'::::: ::::' :: ' ::s••`.::':::'<<'`<::•':`::. :::<:i:<:>:;:i.;': ':>::'::.:;<.::..•::;::..;•.: ::•:•:::»:•:<.:..::.:; �'} �1 }�y �•y J� }y �y �q •fit �y}. ry�::.�,qi,:,:: :.i§:. +•y(".M:.,:::•::•::::::::::::>::::::::: :: : ::„#t::::;tM irk i f .. .F.I' : t F .�".....•Y+.7:...•FeF.................... ....r.................. ...... .. 1 t 3 - R-1 I " I .—c. I 5'" 1............. // •1 49 F—'-- 6. R-3 1 �4.' i f�� B 1 ic, !�_ EDMONDS it'/ // lrir I APT I� � APT R 3 1 -I r I ...._ ���� Z I 1. . ; R-3 '��' ji, APT il I I S��SET 4�'1 GLEN WOOD AVE NE R-2 HARRINGTON AVE NE I:IN B-1 11 • I ...1 , 1. Technical Advisory Committee Staff Report Rodgers Rezone .Pace 2 {„T'yray 18, 1990 MtvommummommomomommasgmmmemmmommmEgmmmommmommosnmemsmmommommEmm (LAND USE) 1. Whether the proposed reclassification is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Map and Goals? The subject property is designated for medium density multi-family use on the Comprehensive Plan Map; similarly, multi-family residential units could be developed on this site in a manner which is consistent with Plan Goals, Policies and Objectives. 2 . Whether the proposed reclassification is consistent with the Zoning Ordinance? The site is sufficiently large and appropriately configured to support R-3 uses in accord with development standards. 3 . Whether the proposed reclassification is consistent with the Reclassification Ordinance? The proposed reclassification appears to be consistent with criteria for reclassification, including absence of recent reclassification, availability of public services and infrastructure to the site, compatibility of proposed classification with classifications/uses for nearby properties, and desirability of placing additional residential complexes in this area of the community. 4 Whether the proposed reclassification is consistent with vicinity uses? Reclassification of this site to R-3 would be compatible with vicinity uses. The property is surrounded to the north with property zoned R-3 and developed with a multi-family .complex, to the south with property zoned R-3 and developed with a convalescent center, to the west by commercially zoned sites, some of which are developed with business uses and some of which are vacant, and to the east with properties zoned for low-density multi-family use and developed with duplexes or single family homes. (ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS) 1. Whether environmental impacts anticipated to occur in conjunction with the proposed reclassification have been adequately identified and addressed? a. Earth Impacts: A geotechnical study was provided for this site. The subject property is reported to include sandy and loamy soils; some fill has been placed on the site. Portions of the site are sloped to approximately 20 percent. There is subterranean water attributed to a perched ground water table. Additional filling and grading can be accommodated to support new development; additional studies are recommended in conjunction with review of specific development for this site to ensure compatibility of the design with the underlying terrain. Mitigation Measures: That the applicant provide a supplementary soils study in conjunction with site plan review for specific development to ensure compatibility with the underlying terrain. Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance 4-6; Mining, Excavation and Grading Ordinance (4-10) . b. Housing Impacts: The subject property is located in Northeast Renton, an area which is generally considered to be desirable for multi-family use under the City's Comprehensive Plan. The site, if developed with 'apartment Technical Advisory .''ommittee Staff Report ,Rodgers Rezone ' Page 3 ..,„,May 18, 1990 units, would offer an appropriate transitional use between low-density multi-family properties to the east and potential/existing commercial' properties to the west. The two single-family homes now on the parcel would need to be removed from the site to accommodate new housing. Public services and infrastructure are generally available to serve the site -- see Sections l..c and 1.e below for additional discussion. • Mitigation Measures: None are required in conjunction with reclassification. Conditions will be required with mandated environmental/site plan review for future multi-family development. Policy Nexus: Not applicable. c. Traffic Impacts: The proposed action, a non-project reclassification, will not result in traffic impacts to the site or the local roadways, however, such impacts would be expected in conjunction with future development of the site. The Comprehensive Plan reports that area rights-of-way can support postulated traffic from allowed developments, including. multi- family development on the subject site. With present types/density of development, levels of service on nearby arterials (Edmonds Avenue, Monroe Avenue, N.E. ' 12th Street and Sunset Boulevard) ,range from acceptable to marginal. As a result, staff will recommend a traffic study at the time of mandated environmental/site plan review for future multi-family development. Mitigation Measures: That the applicant provide a traffic analysis for the intersection of Edmonds Avenue/N.E. Sunset Boulevard in conjunction with environmental/site plan review for a specific project to ensure that adequate levels of service are available, or can be made available through mitigation, with the proposed development. Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance (4-6) ; Streets and Arterials Plan. d. Natural Environment Impacts: A tree inventory depicts several significant trees on the subject property. The proposed non-project reclassification will not affect that inventory. However, a tree retention plan, together with a landscaping plan, and a tree cutting permit will be required in conjunction with environmental/site plan review for future development. Mitigation Measures: That the applicant provide a tree retention plan and a landscaping plan in conjunction with environmental/site plan review for future development, to be approved by the Landscape Planner. No tree cutting will be permitted until the site plan approval is obtained and a vegetation permit is approved. Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance (4-6) ; Land Clearing and Tree Cutting Ordinance (4-9) ; Landscaping Ordinance (4-31-34) . e. Public Services 1. Emergency Services Impacts: No impacts to police and fire services are anticipated from the proposed reclassification; adequate resources are anticipated to be available to serve the site with multi-family residential development. Mitigation Measures: None required in conjunction with the non-project reclassification; measures may be required in conjunction with development review. Policy Nexus: Not applicable. 2 . Storm Water Impacts: No impacts to storm water management are anticipated from the proposed non-project classification. A storm water management system Technical Advisory ^-)mmittee Staff Report .-Rodgers Rezone Pa4e 4 Xay 18, 1990 • which addresses site terrain and protects neighboring properties will need to be provided in conjunction with development review. Mitigation Measures: None required in conjunction with the non-project reclassification; measures will be required in conjunction with development review. ' Policy Nexus: Not applicable. 3 . Utilities Impacts: No impacts to utilities systems are expected from the proposed non-project reclassification. A utilities connection plan and system improvement fees will be required at the time of site plan review. Mitigation- Measures: None required in conjunction with the non-project reclassification; measures will be required in conjunction with . development review. • Policy Nexus: • 4 . Recreation Impacts: No recreation impacts are anticipated from the proposed non- project classification. A recreation plan which provides on-site improvements and contributes to community recreation facilities will need to be provided in conjunction with development review. Mitigation Measures: None required in conjunction with the non-project reclassification; direct on-site improvements and a fair share contribution to off-site improvements will be required with development review. . ' Policy Nexus: Not applicable. 5. Schools Impacts: No impacts to the school system are anticipated from the proposed non-project classification. At the time of development, the City and the applicant will need to work with the Renton School District •to ensure that school-aged children anticipated to live on the site can be accommodated in district institutions. Mitigation Measures: None required in conjunction with the non-project reclassification; at the time of site plan review, allowed project density will be correlated to the ability of the School District to accommodate additional students. • Policy Nexus: Not applicable. ROMPw:.UtOMOMM111 h::::.:::::::::.:::::::::::::::.:::v:::v::::::::::::.:::::::::::::::::::::::•::•.::..:..;;....;..........................................................................::::::::4i:4:•i:•ii:4:G: ::f iii:.'i'•?�:tvi:;iii:'v:{+iiii:i:<v:;iiiii;?{v:is�i'r:i:}::>jyyyiii::$;::iii::itisi>jii:•:L•.'.`•Sk{!i?Ji:{:}ii::iiiiii}}i::iii:i:;;{{:;:;:}iijiii i:iiii: 1. That the applicant, in conjunction with environmental/site plan review for any specific development project, will be required to provide a supplementary soils study to be approved by the Public Works Department to ensure compatibility of the proposed project design with .the underlying terrain. 2 . That the applicant, in conjunction with environmental/site plan review for any specific development project, will be required provide a tree retention plan and a landscaping plan to be approved by the Landscape Planner. No tree cutting will be permitted until site plan • approval is achieved and a vegetation permit is obtained. 3 . That the applicant, in conjunction with environmental/site plan review for any specific project, provide a traffic analysis for the intersection of Edmonds Avenue/N.E. Sunset Boulevard, to be approved by the Public Works Department and the Police Department, to ensure that traffic impacts are sufficiently identified and adequate mitigation Technical Advisory r'ommittee Staff Report , Rodgers Rezone P,ge 5 /May 18, 1990 measures established to provide appropriate levels of service at this intersection, with residential development on this site. NOTE: The conceptual site plan submitted for potential future residential development on this lot has been reviewed and commented upon by staff. Staff recommends that a specific site plan include reduced density, less steep access roads for vehicles and pedestrians, landscaping which would serve as a visual amenity and provide a buffer against light and glare, and off-site and on-site recreational amenities. At the time of development review (environmental and site plan) the applicant will be required to provide mitigation measures to address impacts to public services (e.g. emergency services, schools) and utilities. Additional mitigation measures may also be required to address impacts identified at the time of review of a specific site plan. }:}� ,:i±� j�i:�$St+�}��}:i�y:•'.} yhis}:•,� },�S:{:$v�>iy::r,}t:$j� •y�j:$� •�iiy •q�:{t{�y}::� {:it�::: r:2; :fi:::':: ::: }::<:±;s':}'::::':':'':".`•::::'::::<'s::;:>;;;:2;:5:::::::::':::::r::y ::r:::::::::::::'2:i'::::rk2 :::i:m <,;::::::::::::5:'•i': .'•:::I•li:::::i:'r::<:::X1�171:i!�:�:Fl•".1�:3;::�'<•'::::.ii'.�'7.�1.:Y:::::L�•'�Lt'�':'•t.••r�:••:l':�� 3)1:� r':��'L'i�•l3'LF:I•:��:C:t��x......... ........:;.>::.::.:.•:.>:.>: :���:�:�5:`•:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�'rt�:�:�:�:� :22�:�:�:�5:�:•`••'•�:� :#.';.;::%;:::::M1:::?:%::�:#�:�:�:t�:�:� :�:�:� :#�:�:�:4#�:#�:�:••#:�:�:#�i:� #3;:;�%;`:;?3:�:;: <%?i:{;:5�:::'�:�S: �:`•:�:�#��:�3:+ r:� :�:?�5:�:�:� :�:�:�f�:2� :::::n5:X: :r iGu i::i3F';:%h ii.•:d `:`'�• i+ t E?'::':ha•:YJr:••e:::r: i ':: :::;:: nd::::.'r :G L:C�•'` :3:U;�*'y cn::::ri::h :•`: :3:::: :::::::::::::::`•::::.::.>:.;;>::............................................... $i;•}?ii:•:•:ij:?::;:;:;:•L,+•::isr+}`:::::' :•:;:;:::::•'•?::•::::•:•::i:>.•n.,..•• :•:.•i'r•i:•::^i':6:4:iti<C:•:{•:::4':^i"+iLti:^:•i:•i::^i•r +. •:i::�,i,:•: •iiii:: iiii'�•i : 4'•}ii'•ii:is'iiiiii}i::,.:...{"n:}�•`•i}: y. ^'¢:ti:: .}i{:i.:�:<:::i::ti i'`.::ii:::r::::i::::ii: EEEk '•:si':0 M i'�.:r.••Ef:EE:E: N O.riEE zii'•.fir§QF�r'�'. fr: 'EE'•EE::#.rO7.uh. EE t r.` EEEEE A EEEE:%A'•:�':'•E f:`E 'E:; : ; t�::}:t;: ;..:¢ E: :::.::•::: .: :: '• E:::::E'•r:::::::?:EEE E � ��� � < � �« �� < � > �� � > ��� C of Renton..................................................................................... echn c LA . .a �i May 18, 1990 To: Paul Lumbert Mark Isaacson Glen Gordon Sam Chastain • Penny Bryant Jim Hanson From: Don Erickson, Chairman V . ... ............ .. . ... .. .. .:...........:....:.:...:..:.... . :. .:. .. . . .. Agenda is attached below. TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA MAY 18, 1990 Third Floor Conference Room Commencing at 8:30 AM TIME/KEY PARTICIPANTS NEW PROJECTS • RODGERS REZONE • ECF,R-034-90 Applicant seeks to reclassify a 1.75 acre parcel from R-1, Single-Family Use, to R-3, Medium Density Multi-Family Use, consistent with the Comprehensive. Plan. The property is currently developed with a single-family home • and accessory buildings, which will be demolished if reclassification is achieved, and the property will be then be developed with a multi-family complex; a conceptual site plan has been provided for information only. SUMMERWIND DIVISION #5 FP-041-90 Application for final plat approval for Summerwind Division No. 5, consisting of 74 single family lots. VMC TEMPORARY PARKING LOT ECF;SA-044-90 The proposed parking is designed to provide temporary parking facilities for the hospital employees and construction personnel during construction of the new medical building, and S 43rd Street improvements for a staging area. Ao '6"., r_ %' CITY OF RELATOR OCT 1 5 1990 RECk_.o v CITY CLERK'S OFFICE 50640 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Kathleen Hoover ,being first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the • VALLEY DAILY NEWS • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week. That said newspapers are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King County, Washington. The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Kent Edition X K , Renton Edition X x , Auburn Edition X X , (and not in :; supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice a Public Notice (Ordinance No . 4292) 4725 was published on Or t-o r,e r 5 , 10 9 0 . The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of$ 104 .90 Subscribed and sworn before me this l:i th day of G �19) --/gru__D 4 Notary Public for the State of Washington residing at A-trbur-n zi-- King County, Washington VDN#87 Revised 4/89 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGT ORDINANCE NO 4292 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY RENTON, WASHINGTON CHANG- ING THE ZONING CLASSIFICA- TION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM R-1 (SINGLE-FAMILY RESI- DENTIAL) TO R-3 (MEDIUM DEN- SITY MULTI-FAMILY) ROD- GERS/XENOS; FILE NO. R-034-90). WHEREAS, under Chapter 31 (Zoning), of Title IV (Building Regulations), of Ordi- nance No. 4260 known as the "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton," as amended, and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the prop- erty hereinbelow described has heretofore been zoned as R-1 (Single-Family Residen- tial); and WHEREAS, a.proper petition for change of zone classification of said property has been filed with the Planning Division on or about November 14, 1989, which petition was duly referred to the hearing examiner for investigation, study, and public hearing, and a public hearing having been held thereon on or about July 17, 1990,and said matter having been duly considered by the hearing examiner, and said zoning request being in conformity with the city's compre- hensive plan, as amended, and the city council having duly considered all matters relevant thereto,and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUN- CIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASH- INGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby rezoned to R-3(Medium-Density Multi-Fami- ly), as hereinbelow specified, subject to the findings, conclusions, and decision of the hearing examiner dated July 27, 1990, and the Planning Manager is hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to evi- dence said rezoning, to-wit: See Exhibit"A"attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein (Said property, approximately 1.75 acres, being located at 1132 Edmonds Avenue N.E.) subject to compliance with the conditions of the Environmental Review Committee. SECTION II. This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and five days after its publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 1st day of October, 1990. Marilyn J. Petersen, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 1st day of October, 1990. Earl Clymer, Mayor Approved as to Form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney ORDINANCE NO. 4292 EXHIBIT "A" RODGERS REZONE R-034-90 THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTH- WEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST W.M.; EXCEPT THE SOUTH 75 FEET THERE- OF; AND EXCEPT THE WEST 30 FEET THEREOF FOR EDMONDS AVENUE NORTHEAST; SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHING- TON. Published in the Valley Daily News on October 5, 1990. Acct. #50640. 4725 • October 1. 1990 ', Renton City Council Minutes Page 301 future latecomers for extension of gravity interceptor main to service the Transfer Station property. The Committee further noted that these requirements are proposed in response to the request for exemption only and do not relieve the County from any requirements that have been or will be specified by any division of the City. MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY TANNER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways and Means Ways and Means Committee Chairman Keolker-Wheeler presented the Committee following ordinance for second reading and adoption: Ordinance #4292 An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of 1.75 acres of Rezone: Rodgers/Xenos, property located at 1132 Edmonds Avenue NE, from R-1 (single-family R-034-90 residential) to R-3 (medium density multi-family), Rodgers/Xenos rezone, R-034-90. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. MOTION CARRIED. Ways and Means Committee Chairman Keolker-Wheeler presented the following resolution for reading and adoption: Resolution #2817 A resolution was read authorizing the Mayor to submit an application to the Planning: Downtown State of Washington for a Local Development Matching Fund Grant in the Renton Association amount of $25,000 for downtown redevelopment study. MOVED BY (DRA) Study KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY EDWARDS, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. ADMINISTRATIVE Referred 9/10/90 - Clara Mays, 1056 Olympia Avenue NE, requested REPORT investigation of condition of Good Shepherd group home property located at Citizen Comment: Mays - 1025 Olympia Avenue. Memorandum from Building Official Ronald Nelson Good Shepherd Group stated that an inspector investigated the property and found miscellaneous Home, Olympia Avenue debris on site. Good Shepherd Trustee Larry Prester was contacted and NE, R-015-88 assured the inspector that the area would be cleaned up by October 1, 1990. Citizen Comment: Harsch Referred 9/10/90 - Gary Harsch, 16525 119th SE, Renton, suggested outside - Hazardous Traffic lane at Benson Road and Puget Drive intersection be made into a right hand Condition, Puget turn only lane. Memorandum from Planning/Building/Public Works Drive/Benson Road Administrator Lynn Guttmann to Mayor Clymer stated that investigation Intersection revealed: 1) The intersection demonstrates common design practice providing increased capacity thus reducing delay for northbound traffic. A taper of 175 feet is provided which meets accepted standards. 2) Northbound right turn traffic volume is very low (approximately 1%). 3) Accident reports show only one merging related accident in three years. 4) Some motorists are inconsiderate, but that does not necessitate redesign of the intersection. In accordance with the Public Works Department recommendation, Mayor Clymer informed Mr. Harsch (letter dated 09/20/90) that the City will post an additional warning sign for northbound traffic at Benson and Puget Sound Drive. Citizen Comment: Referred 9/10/90 - Manly Grinolds, 1223 South 3rd Street, Renton, requested Grinolds - I-405 S-Curve the City expedite removal of vacant houses on Renton Hill which are an Project attractive nuisance for rodents and transients. Memorandum from Building Official Ron Nelson stated that WSDOT Engineer Beldon Pearson has advised the City that a demolition contract for the six remaining homes on Renton Hill will be awarded and work will commence between October 1 and 15, 1990. Mr. Nelson also reported that the structures have been secured by WSDOT, and the City monitors them daily. H & HS: 1991 Block Referred 9/10/90 - Council requested Administration to write Congressmen Grant Program Jim McDermott and Rod Chandler asking that block grant funding not be cut. Letters were sent to the Congressmen from Mayor Clymer on September 17, 1990, indicating the City's concern about the future of the Community Development Block Grant program and requesting consideration and action in support of no cutbacks in the program. WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT October 1, 1990 ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following ordinance for second and final reading: Rodgers/Zenos Rezone, 1132 Edmonds Avenue NE, R-034-90, from R-1 to R-3, approximately 1.75 acres The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following resolution for reading and adoption: Washington State Local Development Matching Funds (LDMF) Grant Application and Resolution (Downtown Renton Association Study) Kathy Keolker-W eler, Chair Bo Edwards, Vice-Chair /4,,c4/74-7-04 711 :C?)110714ide Richard Stredicke, Member L S. T. ;Schreiner Accounting Division Manager King County Assessor OF ]? 709A King County Administration Building A �j, Seattle, WA 98104-2384 44, I► 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK C) 4$ 0 z City of Renton -i 200 Mill Avenue South o Renton, Washington 98055 9,0 `o' 235-2501 (206) 9�TF1) SEP1- ' Enclosed is the material you requested. Marilyn J. Petersen, CMC Ordinance No. 4292 City Clerk :-4 October 5, 1990 ?12"ee'ee'te,V). .AVVMW/ • Department of Assessments ATTENTION: Abstract Section-Al Martin OF R.4, 709F King County Administration Blg. A �� - Seattle, WA 98104 �t 0 Z OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK U %/ 0 City of Renton b 200 Mill Avenue South oMOM °' Renton, Washington 98055 9.0 `o- 235-2501 (206) o �� 9.1TD SEP-C Enclosed is the material you requested. Marilyn J. Petersen, CMC Ordinance No. 4292 City Clerk October 5, 1990 ?-19 ..4%M9/4v `� CITY JF RENTON 4 "LL Finance Department Earl Clymer, Mayor October 4, 1990 George Xenos 1616 - 156th N.E., Suite 115 Bellevue, Washington 98008 Re: Rogers/Xenos Rezone, File No. R-034-90 Dear Sir: The referenced rezone request was finalized by the Renton City Council on October 1, 1990 by adoption of Ordinance No. 4292. A copy of the ordinance is enclosed for your files. If we can be of further assistance in this matter, please feel free to call. Sincerely, Cv ) Svc/ Marilyn J P sen, CMC City Clerk cc: S. Michael Rogers Hearing Examiner Community Development/Planning Community Development/Building 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 ///' r . , , CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 4292 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM R-1 (SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) TO R-3 (MEDIUM DENSITY MULTI-FAMILY) (RODGERS/XENOS; FILE NO. R- 034-90) . WHEREAS, under Chapter 31 (Zoning) , of Title IV (Building Regulations) , of Ordinance No. 4260 • known as the "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, " as amended, and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the property hereinbelow described has heretofore been zoned as R-1 (Single-Family Residential) ; and WHEREAS, a proper petition for change of zone classification of said property has been filed with the Planning Division on or about November 14, 1989, which petition was duly referred to the hearing examiner for investigation, study, and public hearing, and a public hearing having been held thereon on or about July 17, 1990, and said matter having been duly considered by the hearing examiner, and said zoning request being in conformity with the city's comprehensive plan, as amended, and the city council having duly considered all matters relevant thereto, and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby rezoned to R-3 (Medium-Density Multi-Family) , as hereinbelow specified, subject to the findings, conclusions, and 1 ORDINANCE NO. 4292 decision of the hearing examiner dated July 27, 1990, and the Planning Manager is hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to evidence said rezoning, to-wit: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein (Said property, approximately 1.75 acres, being located at 1132 Edmonds Avenue N.E. ) subject to compliance with the conditions of the Environmental Review Committee. SECTION II. This Ordinance shall be effective upon its (passage, approval, and five days after its publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 1st day of October 1990. 7Ck) _Marilyn &etersen, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 1st day of October 1990. C Earl Clymer, or Approv as to form: Lawrence J. War en, City Attorney Date of Publication: October 5, 1990. ORD. 167 :8/21/90:as. 2 ORDINANCE NO. 4292 EXHIBIT "A" RODGERS REZONE R-034-90 THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST W.M. ; EXCEPT THE SOUTH 75 FEET THEREOF; AND EXCEPT THE WEST 30 FEET THEREOF FOR EDMONDS AVENUE NORTHEAST; SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KINC, STATE OF WASHINGTON. • i i ' 3 I DAYTON AVE NE • -liti4 ,.•.. j r /// , -\>"-----\... , ., / r / i. ;. t I. I 1 DAYTON CT NE � 4 � 1 R-1 B1 r 7,---i---,-, I R ti 1, . I Sf`/Ij/I/-fi , , . • y¢ o: �:�_ rt MT - APT . 70 . 3i"::"?..V. �rx S• i. .1\_ �. ¢ s�T' \ O m \\... s if~' ! APT \�\ 4- z • ti%s 4Y I IH N = z GLEN WOOD AVE NE ��J z j SCALE: 1'=200 til R�2 — It \ .\_/. rIr -3 �\, \ ' '� Balma & Holmberg Inc. \ R-1 1 1 N -1 Lr-�� 1r—r_ E N G I N E E R S & SURVEY O I 1 O6 X.T. anjwc BLVD.. SUITS 7 1 i 1 II 1 1 1 i ��� xLs7Dl , r ( o) - ti September 24. 1990 Renton City Council Minutes Page 293 responded to a variety of questions including rebate provisions and increasing internal'premiums by 50% of the medical component of the Seattle Consumer Price Index (CPI). It was the Committee's consensus to approve the final report, and refer it to the Ways and Means Committee for appropriate legislation. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Public Works: Jackets Councilman Stredicke commented that it had come to his attention that the Purchased by City City had purchased jackets for Public Works Department employees, and he requested a report from the Administration regarding this matter. H & HS: Suburban Cities Public Safety Committee Chairman Edward presented a report stating that the Domestic Violence Committee reviewed a proposal to commit a suggested 11 percent of the Project, Sales Tax Option City's new Law/Safety/Justice sales tax revenue to domestic violence programming developed by the Family Violence Regional Work Group of the Human Services Roundtable. The proposal concerned funding of domestic violence community advocates; training and protocol development for police, courts, and domestic violence advocates; and development of standardized informational materials for police and victims. The Committee recommended that the matter be referred to the Administration to develop a comprehensive plan.for the distribution of the new sales tax revenue by the departments involved. The completed plan should then be referred back to the Committee for review and recommendation. MOVED BY EDWARDS, SECONDED BY ZIMMERMAN, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT.* Councilman Edwards explained that this is a specific request for allocation of a portion of the money raised from this tax, and the Committee would like to review all of the uses for the Law/Safety/Justice sales tax before making a recommendation. He said as an example of possible uses, that when police officer positions were cut from the budget, there was a discussion of this tax and the possibility of reinstating those positions if the bill was passed. Councilwoman Zimmerman said it was her understanding that the police positions had been deferred not terminated from the budget, and requested a report from the Administration regarding this matter. Councilwoman Keolker-Wheeler commented that she would like to see this item included in the budget process and not considered as a separate item. *MOTION CARRIED. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways and Means Ways and Means Committee Chairman Keolker-Wheeler presented the Committee following ordinance for first reading: Rezone: Rodgers/Xenos, An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of the R-0 340 .Rodgers/Xenos property, 1.75 acres located at 1132 Edmonds Avenue NE, from R-1 (single family residential) to R-3 (medium density multi-family) (R-034-90). MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL REFER ORDINANCE BACK TO WAYS AND 1 MEANS COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. Ways and Means Committee Chairman Keolker-Wheeler presented the following resolution for reading and adoption: Resolution 2816 A resolution was read accepting grant funds to implement the Growth Suburban Cities: Growth Management Act of 1990. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, Management Funds SECONDED BY EDWARDS, COUNCIL ADOPT RESOLUTION AS READ. Distribution CARRIED. Council President Mathews requested that the Suburban Cities Association Growth Management Chairman receive a copy of this resolution. Vouchers Ways and Means Committee Chairman Keolker-Wheeler presented a report recommending approval of payment claims checks #73129 through 73490 and four wire transfers totaling $1,138,683.19; and payroll vouchers #91410 through 91849 and 233 direct deposits in the amount of $771,818.59. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY EDWARDS, COUNCIL CONCUR IN,APPROVAL OF VOUCHERS. CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS Council President Mathews noted that a legislative agenda and regional Council: Committee of matters, such as Puget Sound Council of Governments Vision 2020 structure the Whole Agenda and METRO issues, need to be reviewed by Council. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY ZIMMERMAN, COUNCIL REFER REGIONAL ISSUES AND THE LEGISLATIVE AGENDA TO THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE. CARRIED. AYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT September 24, 1990 ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following ordinance for first reading: Rodgers/Zenos Rezone, 1132 Edmonds Avenue NE, R-034-90, from R-1 to R-3, • approximately 1.75 acres The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following resolution for reading and adoption: Growth Management Funds Distribution APPROVAL OF VOUCHERS The Ways and Means Committee recommends for payment claims checks #73129 through 73490 and four wire transfers, totaling $1,138,683.19; and payroll vouchers #91410 through 91849, and 233 direct deposits, in the amount of $771,818.59. Kathy KgtDlker-Wheeler, Chair Bob Edwards, Vice-Chair Richard Stredicke, Member / � 1 I A„_&-X-•0461 PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON Avs�l p3y-7OJ TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE CO. 320 108th Avenue N.E. SEP 1 4 1990 Bellevue, WA 98004 RECEIVED Dated as of Sept. 4, 1990 at 8:00 A.M. Transamerica No. : 0797101 Prepared for: Customer No. --- Seller : Rodgers PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT ASSOC. Buyer/Borrower --- 1616 - 156TH AVE N.E. #115 BELLEVUE, WA 98008 For service on this order call : ATTN: GEORGE XENOS 646-8580/1-800-441-7701 LIZ SIMPSON, DAVID P. CAMPBELL (FAX #646-8593) SUPPLEMENTAL TITLE REPORT NO _ 1 after Policy The following matters affect the property covered by this order: ( ) Paragraph(s) No. of our preliminary commitment is eliminated. ( ) Our ALTA inspection of the premises on discloses: 1. Our legal description has been amended to read as follows: THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST W.M. ; EXCEPT THE SOUTH 75 FEET THEREOF; AND EXCEPT THE WEST 30 FEET THEREOF FOR EDMONDS AVENUE NORTHEAST; SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KINC, STATE OF WASHINGTON. PC) Except as to the matters reported hereinabove, the title to the property covered by this order has NOT been reexamined. ( ) There has been no change in the title to the property covered by this order since , EXCEPT the matters noted hereinabove. • CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM AUG 301990 RECEIVED DATE: August 30, 1990 TO: Lenora Blauman, Project Manager FROM: Mike Dotson, Property Management SUBJECT: LEGAL REVIEW FOR ROGERS REZONE R-034-90 We have reviewed the legal for the Rodgers rezone ordinance and have the following comments; 1. The legal description needs to be labeled as "Exhibit A" to attache to the rezone ordinance (see red-line comments attached hereto). 2. The error in the beginning of the legal description needs to be corrected in "typing" (see comments on attached copy of description). If you have any further questions please advise. rezone/rodgers/mdd LPSC.E AS as' %cp n .3tof 9°‘A. DESCRIPTION: j " e-147, /1j 'I v —rki L z5ou`Th 9 11--HWEST 1/2 OF THE WEST 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST W.M. ; EXCEPT THE SOUTH 75 FEET THEREOF; AND EXCEPT THE WEST 30 FEET THEREOF FOR EDMONDS AVENUE NORTHEAST; SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. PAGE 2 0797101 ii 1° ' • 1 O L. � 1 0 , �. ..j \ o1 ..___ ,...__L.__ ' i i - ,- -- - ---i CC ; - ( { . • 4C` 'r' LL 1 1 COIll. .. ,...r..�� 1 1 .. 1 _ D ' \ [ I . • . 1:- . ________. _......._ .......... .-b, i � ,a f � fre 1 1-- l� N LAC O1 I Cl •. `� s l\ • ' Rodgers Rezone . ECF:R-034-90 - • APPLICANT S. Michael Rodgers TOTAL AREA 1 .75 Acres • PRINCIPAL ACCESS Edmonds Ave NE EXISTING ZONING R-1 EXISTING USE Residential PROPOSED USE Multiple Family Development COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN • COMMENTS Located @ 1132 Edmonds Avenue N.E. • a: • CITY OF RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM • DATE: �.� kg 0 TO: Mike Dats_o.n* and/or Dave Tibbot** FROM: �-QDC Q- � � , Project Manager Department of Community Development SUBJECT/PROJECT: `l d -eYS PROJECT NUMBER: k 3 -� D • Attached are THREE copies of and the above-referenced file. (Please note that the Public Works Department will not be able to review legal descriptions or other submittals received via FAX) Project Status/Review Stage : TAC Review (Preliminary) ERC Review V Final review (calculations and certification enclosed) Revisions to previously reviewed plans dated Other: This project was submitted in conjunction with the following other application type (s) : Rezone Site Plan. Approval Variance Annexation Other: Please return your comments/determination to the Community Development Department (ATTN: Sandi Seeger, Administrative Assistant) by: c\ 1 VVb Thank you. * Mike has responsibility for review of preliminary and final review of legals , easements and off-site utility improvements . ** Dave has responsibility for final review of off-site utility improvements and mylars for all types of plats and property line adjustments ' . , • .. • • . . . . • . . , . . '. TO: LENORE BLAUMAN . . DATE: 8/23/90 FROM; CITY CLERK'S OFFICE . • . • . • . SUBJECT: Rodgers/Xenos Rezone Ordinance (R-'034-90) • _ • •• Please furnish the following to the City Clerk's Office: Certification of Posting X Legal Description • • Certification of Valid Peti,ttusION x Map PLPNNINu WO ' Deed S'\I\1 () Cr3" . 199 Pro Rata Share of Costs . 0 Easement A.10 2- • Restrictive Covenants x Verify Content • • .Please verify content of the attached ordinance, legal description, and • map for the subject property and initial your approval . . . •THANK YOU! Requested by: Marilyn Petersen • •,...,,!:•,'.• -. .-:-..-fven.,:f.'•,..,,,.i:...•.1-...,-..1.,:':,..3,:'.'t....',, •,.:.....7.-r.::, ...-?,:,.'.....,1:•?.....,s;:.,Atri,s....4;...,.',..T,17,,•:.,‘:.:,,v:::t.;!,,,...,74,i,ri N.:.:...,2-',1'.?.V•:,:5r, .i.....ii.,::::;:'!$,;:::::'4',,,,,,....;:c.:...f:iFif.:::;t:,g,I.:ii-r.ipi:'.1;;:;1.;:',,,',1,:,,i;:::...!'.,:j,'Lz.,:...f.nil,.........,;:::.':r;::..,;:.1':, 'i'.,...,••.•.::,..:.:::.)::,,P;:'...':-;.:1-, ,i::.::::.•- ::::,',,:....: , 1;,.:', ..:...: ::.i.:, .:....f'..,:i: 444 -0..,i,f,..,.,..7 t,'.i..,•,.;;;;,.,•, ,.;;....,,,,,,•typ...,:if.'..t.,•,,J,IA••,fiti..p 1,;.,i k,,,,,4,..;„1,.,,,,,i.,,,,,-s..q.,..v..,,,,q,.71,,,1•,..,;:e4.:1......t;•:•,,•,,-.,,,,,,„!,•;.,:,...-.....• ........• •, .'!"..,-• 'i .,'-'1...4i.;.1-,...1`.....:,:?...:','' ",!:.;,..-...!."--:':-.f5'..,..l..:•••.'-..,,'!'..,•.'1:,;,-:p-t,:i.,,,^:.!:...'f.':‘>,;',V., .'IP:•.11.1.', ...v•Aililli';: '.',,.s.,',...'1...:•!•;%'!:.•':'(:',::-:'•-...')...-4'Is',^,:,,, hf.;...,.';:.:*:4..?,44...'... ,t;s,?:!:-.4..',.Et,l,il'•••:.• .:‘..:Ip,44;',•;.i.,-,!1,11,01.."':' .' ••,'.'', ...-... ,-..•.:•:.''.. '-:•••••at'Ok...:.,.1'1. '1, .'.7 -..;-,,...'::',..... '. i',.;-..'-:•,•.•.,;',. r.',...:'--',.•t,i7.,11',:%!..,;,: :•.7 ,1,',4L''•'...:;;.'•:',•'...1;'.';,:y.V.7.1::', .;•!;';'i,...i!1•Z`r.' ii.',t';'''•:.i•I'A`r...1;‘'11,4.1:.il......4V...13.4.1%.••ri7.4::1`,...';';';'!":.!••i...'...'ia•c,;Y:02::';',::.'''. .' • ••• ............ . ,,:.2.,A•c,'0.;;:l.•••. ....c,L).;.: .1?......4..,•:.,;- ...,,,.. ......•.,• • ,....s... ,•,;•:.,:i.•;p,•1, .••;: ,'•,!; !'.. .i'Ll!!'j•J!,•;:,1..i..;:c.;•:A.,f.:•'';••.k...,••;''-t.)•4'i.•.4&.'. '.!! ',:':,.!..'2-71,.il.V'Y','S`5P1-1; :•f'•..r;?••••1)::•).:'..!•:'!•4'....', -i.;;;:••••i ',4);;:s-1:: ••••,....;:!1.. .- 1''''• . 1 '.....:;.:.•.'1•,'....'•...,::,....0;,:?,!•ti, ..•'-:,•,',...;i".':',...." ,: ‘•:-i;:::..,••;;;:•:Y..y• ..;•!;:,',.)1.:i'...!:...:.•;•',, , , .'•q;.'',..t:..),.0,i';'f'....1.14;:::1-:.,..s....6.'i•.;.;'.;.•.,Y.4";',0::(1, 4 .',.•;!•••ii'.'.... ...;4-.,„,A,'ST..... .14.... J :it,c1;, ,!,...1.,(..,..,i.!•71;i;.,.:1.',..t, ,ig4,11..,,.;.."',:y...,.•-...,';‘,.,:,?'..!•;.!::..••;,•...., ', ....'1!,'4,..4,,,f*:'.!.';•:!',.:"..)::.,:"...:,.".!...••••'(14fs,.','...:• ''••;.•;: ....:;:,1' .1 .,./'•,'..,3 •1:.',':',!:••••••:.;: '1..1.1., 1 }il.:!.'..,:'!•••,?•,.. ,,...13:'.....'.:.1ir.I.c.;,Isi3fi'' i..";-,';',.;•6:7;*jr';;Ie..',.. ..ti.:•!;.:!ieff!,4;;:t.;...Z,1.14'i,'.4,!..li,:q-.1.1!;...f....-;;‘:'e,...-?il' ,l'st.V,.!•::.',1.1'.' '''•:•':!...1:-:' S. 1 :...,.i,',.:',..,:,:'.,'...:..1 At!..',;':i":.i,•,:'_.;,••.:..,...',‘.:::,{:,;f,..,';'..;:i...,',.:,..,Iit .•;'...:.'.,. '. ,•,•i.;.''.. ,-;'..!..','Ili:.. .,''!;.( ,,!.-;i',. .z.:.;,••;; 'i:•i',.*.:7.'.•!,.•........ .:41.1.i*.X,'"A•:.:',;;•;:.;:•:;.:(..,,$,.); ill,*;;;''...r...i•'..•;;.:j..14.';...;:....;• :...•,11;i•:.',0ig:'..,.‘41..1-..:f;:';q.%..::'-'ili.:;,•.::.i.,:',.•-%.?.....f.i,•-•..1.•:,'....;:..':'.....%.i,'.....: ..,...-••••:'. • ...,.....:Or-th;•••••:::,:.:'.':•!!•••";i.'..:.•?••••5'•'; r.;',.%2',..' .''1:.:;.:•••'!..'.;':/i',!1.''':it ''.';;'k1,,/,••••••;•..(!,.".;'1.4-7i'.',..4;1:01.!:!it411V.s..1..,.':•i4Z,,1..1**,'• 4$'1. ,,,,•.;1.p...;:g..:•:...'5i:i..;‘,.tii.:.i.•,,t5;:• .*.•.>.*:1.4':.p.:•.411..:'. .t,e4A• ,-.'•1!..*..:- .- • '.•.1.1.;;.:::; .::.,y',..,;;1;;:',,i,fit;4.-;:..,...:).•.....•%;.';;'‘..'',•,:.:-.-i'.i,f,,,,,.;....' 'i.,.(.'...•:.; -.f.•••',:'...),......,.":;:',..'•1.•-'1.. 0.'.....1.•-,•••• l'!";..,0•-....• :,•;-..-•":..!...,,;...:•,?,•. ..,••••.-•......;•It. :.''t, .t...,••••••C.;:'..e:a.t..:1:,•,,i:,'::;•,/,••...:!.••:',,tkyl•:,:;,:it 4,1• ':1.,4 s.U.4 . ii••••••:,••••',-',.'..•••:'.. •'•-•'.,(.:: ••t:',•••!',','ii;:/;••••-i:•.".i't•f;';'...:....,ii:t1,•2:,''..t.-..•,..•••••.:',:t..-*.c:"., it'?!...:•.t...:••.;f/t1•1'••:'')7.,k,:.;%:•;.1;%.,.:',;:':''...'•411.1:•!,'t W•'1..''':f...:..Ce*!0;'41:`''-',?,!:•%33.th;',11.4**,4 4'..',:h..-0:.;t:6.''.SY.0.1: ;i:INV'N t'.;•;r114;4.P.*Vtl'..*:;zi..i;'..;;;),:%:•?,,::;k..VW . .;.,'8;-;.:'%:',..';':••: •.'• :;,,i'.' 1 - ;T.,,L.,„ •,;*,tt•,%,...,,.7,....7.,;,,,,..,,,, ,,,ri,;:,..,1.;,..1......c,,,,;:f,!,.e:.,,,,:,...;...i:,•,,,,...., ...-*.,i,;.. ,...',...:..j;!!...cit;=t;,;.!...q,,...,..;x'',;.;';',1;]*<.:el.,'1.,: .' '' " • k' '.1.4.;.'•!.'N;••7!:. ..i•PviV,;.i.i71 :41.-•,,CriC:..ilgi'';i:V:','..."..i!.:',.:;;:4';'!-1,'''''ql;;:,k,kt.:1"1-*.`-'- 1 i -',.t.f'•••••i,..'." ''..:'•••.;•!...•i'fi';'l!f'?,.•:.;-. *..;.',....:4`'',"..'•'!''.•.:i•L'..•??‘".''. •:::i'l,';''' ::;'".;•., . '',..Ps.. , ,‘.......;...•`;'1.i.,./(q, .,,;;; ,-,'..',';•:;•!,:4'.:41.;.;tr....;;;;14,;?..;•:',••1,1,;;;;1,7..! '...•;.;f,.'!)."4'I,'!,.' . ,.1i; ',.f.••••if,";:;•': ..1.:'•'':''s':•'•••i'f..,;;j1. '1,0.0:1•;•:••••4.•:..':,.1''• ...;,..... • ,.-„,1q..•,:.1.1 ..,.... ,,.,.,.•;•„,,,. •••n;., .•.r,.,.'• ,:; .• ., • ,•.V.1,14,:,r!.:e,,..::.•...,Alf{,,,,,,,•,;:,.:,14...),•.....•.ri,t•:.',,,....'.-,.,,:.::.• ;i".,,,,,,...,..,s,..,.i.,ii......,,,J::$?.,:,,,,,,,,,../...,,,.....6A.:•,....),„I......;•,,,,,,',,cv.4....,..'":..,....:: .....,.. !..L.;......-•.'. ,-- '•!...RV!.,"t:t:1.*"..•'t-1-'::•rt.: -.-•'',tt'f•V;•.••.' ''•-':. "%•t",••.,:'-•; •••••4v.'elit.•:'•*'!'t.•-•:'••••.4''','4?..i.,::•.:•.11.'•.:‘,..,.t r)trf,-;‘,:.•;•%*ii-tt.'4'.',. ....eY''.ttl ..'",.. , ';•••f.;,...,•k,J;:rtr.V.:', '•:-..:,.... ..",-..•••••te;••••,,•:•",..4*4:\%.t!:•!*;-'-'•.'•••'•%.1 % ,.••••sc..,;1,:,•.• ';'!,...t*,..4%10.ist.t*:!,I::• •;;*•,.;',...:•,...;•'t,',!?...,•;:•,:t* '....,'5t::::..‘".....,:,..f,e,..:•..";'...,P.I.V.1'...:?,),•c..',L''.4•1 !.(i6j.,.1,....'R,'14,1::,44!;,.4.4'...,•.,1;••,..•.6ii....Yrill.,‘:.`...,!,,:j.,i.:1;!,!:01.,A,`...4, -.:..,'....,iic.s.c?..4.,•;f.g..., ;*•:?.i.*:$0p..,',:"V.;',',,,Y.41.,r5',,,45'...,',.!..;'.,., „1,,..; -',i•••,:,,'.;... •.•!.,:•;',3;,;.:.::1:;',!:•6"...- .•'.r-,./:i .•','S,.(':'••;;• :;,••••"•.!4,`.' ..•-•;;.''•.".;•'::.;•''li '''..',?...!'!,:.:',i...;?,...ig,.,k• ::-..,t,:',•!.'.",7.•.,1.'-•1Y.';•:•1 i'*•\14..f.....11P.10'`.i.'•'.%•;'.7,•••••',1;:..1;.is':.':':•:•.:i.nl'-'...:•.?..,i''.'ilf.'.;','..ii•:••%,..'.7.'.,:,%.,'•fi''...iri:•1:...1.1.'!:10;114V.::...'-'::1'....• '',....'' .,,,.'f,;:,•..,.': • ..'lli,,.....,, i;',.:,..','''•. :.....,,'.....,:... •,,•,t;'.,•,'?•%.,t„";:: '„..;',.?,.?:i'...•• ,.•,•••;•%,•:1 4)A1:./.;'/.!;,:::.,.:::,•ii'44 :1••••;.:*••• ••'.1.:1•••:3•'11i:'IV• e ,... i...',.!),ft-,ip•:4,......;1,.z..,: •:.;;;;I.:F, i.......v•;•... :',!1. ,:)..:',.:; ,..-',....:],:•!::.e.,,,:o.:Iii?.:y„,...•;...;:,'... - .....-,. :..,,:•.•,'....., ..2‘..,c1,..olif..,fe....-...‘.....".,•,,:'.... •.::;:'...,':••••, .'.' ....,C.•:.••.' Yi:'..'-.. . '• :'••••,.lit,...1.*-,',....tt.........'•i.• ' ..';'.;,'..:.1.-•,'/.;••,:..'.'.i' •;.' '...,'.)-§i....e..` ',..:;2,-....-!..c:.f.',:,';',4.:.--‘:..1;!.:Ii.':1.•.,;":4,!....'N?•;•:*iii,-+;-:4•A:-.i.M.."....'•..'0 ,T.c.1.1../.:,:.; : :,.•'. ... ...:':-......,.. .-, •,....-.;,,:',',,,Iki:.11K4f..-•;-'...r.•':,,:•• --••;•fr....'.5:'.••...,.....::. .,..,''''.•• :..: ••• .....',?...). ...:..,.:..... .,i'., ,ir-,'4.i..,!:•:::...i,.-,,,, 0:. ,,...?.13:•/.. I :).;.,..1.,... 1,..;.'..-',i,i;,....';:•:s.:::',;.::',.'1,.`3';:,... ..V:.•1'!4:4.•',.-..•:i::':-..-;i,....1:;:„;.!•].?:, .11,-;:6;:,,.,'..',..,..•.,•..•,•,. ......• •.-.......,,-2,•;...e,ixi'„,„:.:. ';,,'....,•i','. t.,;;•:;•., .:.::.f.:.:,...,. -, ;., ..„•,,IA;,•,;,-,..:,.,•,..,,,...,t.i,;;;;,f,•.,-,:,,,,F2::,...•,....:,:.k.;f6,c,.......;:;.:,-:.z,i.le,F.,15..,;,.•'.;,..,t',. ..'..i::,...‘.'-••;',...';,. .. .'f?',.:7.•,',,r...•';',.:',.;;',..`;:i7,:.;41.n14,',4.';. :-.-•:: ,,..••••.,• • •.,, :,-....,..,,,,,,,,i..:?-.,li,:•:;.,...::: . .,,..-.., •..,.:;•.-,!,4.-: ,., -;:„,.;•.ti .1,....•::.!...1.i,thou,......-.,........:,..,,,..0.,,f,,,;.:;.::...1••::.•,....'.•-rs.',.',.ti,(.:,V.• ,i:;iil.'r..'' ',.'.:'•,-'..;•,:.'•''.;'''.1:'.'&....i.,•';..'..,' ,:',1"..i.'',.::::•••:.';''•,`-,i3,'.'..f.f.i,,14,',.,,::"...'':-.... ...-.' ''''. ' ,..,.A.,,,;,...v.:,,.,.. :;.:. •„,.., ...,,f..•,.. ..,„;...,.....,...,. ..,..:,.,,, ..:,.i...g ,41„.; ,f.I .1,.,,,7..,....,.r.,42.,v„,,.7.,,Vi.:.:.:•,•,;........,3;Nitc,,te.;....,,,-.:';',:!,:; :;.::•'.•,!;•4,,.•.,',•t;t'tk,..G.-.;.,'.,..t.*:'•''..::':!•'..../.:,'!1/41.•'t•'••••:21-•.',t•• - • •••• • •••`•• ••• *,:iit,*•t';t.,%:::;''... •• •t• ;;;*.:!•• .•, t•,•,..,• ..:•.: ' tq. .% •• •'..-"Agi14:•.!* ..!t:•,i,;.?•,..'1, ..i..;•t*•..:Ii%'•:•).t:.••••.,.,;.4%•••-;•.,ntl,A*•,•••'.;•%t•-• t..,k.••.%.4...7...,%•"•:.,;•;:•••••.%•'„•`•-',q•,•,.•;*.,,.•;::•ty,....•;•....;.i-t•;:txtozjr,...-., •.: . .,,t. ....4',...::::::.*•••,•,;';',' !: 1:;!.. •"t "*.*'''. •'• [.:- !• '•''•''t. ••*.•:'!.:.-': '•!*'•.•'. *' ..'.... *:•:,..,.V, ,.,,.:•;.'..i.•:‘...'%ti,..,'".:I1;:,.•::•.•••t',...;',?IiI.-Si..•,'•itt:t.n.'•;' 1.%:i4 V.."Ir-4•4-)ri.;: .1.4...!!•:•. ••:..-1,....1•A?&f:;:•;'•' :'*. • .,•'..* 4 •, .. •• t:....• : .'.. :::.::.• .•• , :: ••', "•' %-.4%V.7.' *c..•••;•:.•••',:...:'i.:••:.,-i••:,%i•••••;•,..•i',•'•:?;i:•:::•,*•.•Vt...',1%1•*:;k01"i-1:.'...:*;.•,..t--,":!t•••••P.••• •tttt.n.....c.;t.V•i•-•:;',"tf!:%4,:s",-i,,'•:'•••::'•,%.*i,•':!..Y.',...li3.';;:.?-'•.:- : ' . I*,' • • • : - !,.h.••";'! 1....••;••••':I•• .,,, . -t...."...•• ,.••.-,•...- '.•••••••••;.: . it',101•••'.!- .,,,,,,,,•'.7.1;•,, ... •';c.,..,,, ..;t•ft•,-.....t.:',.Y..; ,fq.teal.4., ttr.1,••,•1,-t,1*.,..s.:'.1,-.ti.,-,•:'.0;,W,-:;2.,t,t;,:tvt.,t,.,,f,,,....,•!.',.,,..,•,•.,,,,:,V.;.',,,,,.,,„.,•: • ., • . ili.!..1:;,t:i:;-•:'!,.:!.F.• .'. :Iii:'.. ;3•'T.:. .':.:::r.'" .''. ,•..;:.ii.,Icil I,;:?..,!!;'.f.,••'::':'.'f''•:...;..''.;•• ••Ii.A.Vel,'/1...,':)"..!':`!;/,:;11 ''.....1.;..::./,••;1'•;',....L.:!..i..ifijii';: ::‘1:"•'','...');':':'•!...n,f.:i''''''f`a::•'.,,I '''' ''.'.•:':';:l.:' : : ;. .;,,.'...."7 f.:...-;' • ' •:....: •; '.-;.•' -.: :.:: *:'''.',...... :.'.., T,i.....'•:.::...:.:)....::;,:,.',..1.......c:........!•':',A'itil;.'''.0.,...').;.1..i.'..t...... :.i:5....;:.'...iiW,...'z.. I',......:!,':..21...f,:..,,..,,i;.-...3.,1h.,%.;;.%'.....:-.• ... ,—. ' ,.... •: :„.;:i.,:.;;,.,...;i.. ..,,•..,,,,,,,„ i.o.,:::.-,.: -,,..‘i,o,.:•:',:41,,,.;:4.g,'":.•...,;,V.:.;', -.:•17...,'N;1;`.':-:•1•.•:•:,:::..•:•;.':':..f.'r.i,..':.'...f • ' '' . ••"• : ' •.:441•:;\.1 Y.:, ,.': :',• :'..`0:*•.. :'.'s...1','•.;.2.,••••.'..•. - ''.... ;i4t1....'. ,... ..,,s(,'?:,•,L.':•,‘,...1,";•••.,....:. ..'f, '.•'.• ..•••::?'• •. li.:24'.''C'...'''. ••...i" .• ''.7k:'i.:,;''1,,;'';:••;;:•!. ;:.•11'.,,;.';•:,,%,,,.....,;.'..;.,2,•,?,Isr•.,••,..2;.,:.::',.,4 ......' : . • '..''..,:":',:'''.X l!..•.0 .?.! .-'.•2: ":t•:'' . •••'s.1•:r...'-.2.'2:..'. . ..:.•'..'igit.1......':.............t 1 ...'t'''..,I 1: .:'''[•..'••:?(1.'::•:i''''1!.)•' 1!.'':e. .i..........n'irY(:•;:l!..'22•..i.e. ‘:'?$•:::'''....C.'.'••:t's.si:;'•;': ;' 11.?'''',...i ?,'''. '. 2:•' • ;•..: . ..-.• -.1. ',''.'•.'.',": :•i... .'..k.t:'.'".• •'...."'..-...:"''.;.•,:'; !' ...).',if'014 /2 .,/". •i;.,::.:,,;',.:,0,,A.... *•..,,F.,"•,'••••.•.' ;.•,:s:;',*.',1;•;•,•i,',..,', .,• ..±;,, ...,14,:,V;..)..t,y;i.;,024-g;::,•1';.1,117.‘...:41.'4, •V%-.•k!t%1•*.i:!.04;f7.0;t41";•';•'•.1.":•: •••• •'''• —'•::•• •• • .. ••'f/:'"'f: ,'•"'".•.'s'f•••.''''..1,'..,f; .:.•1;!/ ••,.':•f..'',•!,.''I f•4'...1.,.r. '.41,11'•'.:''.,?:•..;.1.....'t.".°:' 11::.'i; '..,...f I''''•'!.',:',1,'•!i''''f ''',...'!..., . f**:!''.-*.'1'...."••.!‘","., '.',:,04.%1';.!;-;•.%,..:::•f4.**1."*''''•*-t'''''':, •?'•••%'4',.''S......•••.•-% ,'1 '', ...• *.• ' 4'' '.**.. a*''''** '''.**-. . *.* '-'''' •:' ' . *.• I fiti':•"••••:t. ..•'.t,*:t'..c.4:'C..%••••;t '::''t.''-•'%'%-i 4.`1.:'‘47 A*.•.1.1, .:;4:. ••••• •!•i•';.•y:''.....,.•:,;:.•,:'.5,,-..':':.*,:,;'•.i1itt;.4.,:::'::'if:::...•'•,:j.,';;A:;;;4:4,'''.'.".1.:•1:,:::'''••: ':.:.:... •' ::':•••••!4.'3C!'i•••••• •• •..•• ;•'•. • :r, :'• :.•••••''':••••.•1. :Th.,:.':•.:, •‘•* ••'•.•Y . •i:.J.:::.:1').•';-..••::„: . ,•:';'.X71'.:,.;.'•,: e;.'NA' .‘••,, ,, ...•:,..':::;•:••••X4:::,..;... .1.,,ii;•1,,,,f, Ii;;;•.%)..:•;;;:•,,I,;:[Arti•i.j. ....'..',.;y :1",••;,. .,';:•" •:•'•• :• ••.f:ta.,'NTt:'.1,': • : *::'''' '';'•''....'.: . ' '' • •.,s' •:. '•:••••f'?"iitili)..; ‘.:•''....:?•:; ill:•'• ''••'N ''•' ' ''-:•:''..i':4.'"... 4!4,•••• let,:i•'it:' •':kl.':.ti:•.'••''Y•ir..".;!••••t1W. i...;!'.:,.,• ' '•••):•:;:•.4'..:•::'i•li•••::,'''.•••••',:::;;. 315::. ''...., "• •;••'. ' 1 ,••'S'" • ,:,:i :;•.,:*•41.:•:.:..• :::••• ,:•••••••-•••.:• •''" 1.•: ..: •••t:::'•4' • • r::'i';'''''":•'4:::,:::'''':•,;• c?.. ..::.'''':::'••‘;'••''''''•'''444i 1••••••";:• :'•:'.'4':::' ';•••,:, .';...!"):-•••!• :'54.1i.:•.:•.'•,:'')•••''•••'•'' ••• •••:;:i••t/i•t'': , '. :' •l'''• f .•• •, , •,„ , . ,, ;;:: •'.iii I; ;;.'i;.;::'',1:4•,' . • ••I''.i;' .":I''••'''ANV''1,1`......:.':','';••,;f4;' ,:;••.;•<7,•1•;„.,:4,,,q't'l'.'‘'''••r,i':'.'1'.:-:;•,!..',,•',',:1,:.';; 'r.te,z,.., ..• ' -" , ' '. ,. . • '•:';??,...741:. '.' •- ., ' :,'''••,'•:'..'-• ,.- ' '''IA' ''' • ' '" ' '''•. . . •''''''' ''.I. 1.-N't• :•;;;,.:: ."-% i.; ,,•:,.f.F,:ef.:?,:•.;.'.',-.•-•i:',...,-;.•.2••:•'.1..t4;!;:.: .•. . .••'•. :•: .;• . : :4'....'X'.:.•..''.- .. .:.1,•*: ..."•.•' .''' •:' 'W'A•V..*.•••• •';''''%',i''''...`•1..,'••'r'• 1",:''': ' ,:'' . ...1.. , '..,.: '!.• ,''.:•.,:•.!;:''.:'',1.:7 ..':-.''. •qi..i ; .. ,, 1 :. 41. 1,:.: •• •i• . • • '4.'4'. . • '• '' '''....' '' .•'-.. ': '••' ' •:..'4,41'• '. - •:•'.!'"4:):. ) •i....r, ,..',-: . .2•4...41,4.z. ....s.. .!..;i-'••.:-•..,.:••..•:;.....f -.--!.........1.,.....4.v.-.1-.c:' ;'.•1<...::.-;•.,r0,4.... • ..?, -.•.,:,',.... .:.`'....gi:::::';',',.' ''•' ..••• !..:' •'•.;.:1•:,...;-. -• •••.'..... .'" • •. 'tiNt'.:..•..... ''• '..,'.kl'%:•..,:'. ..-$'....".: •••:!-•i•..''-•'','..:'4',c'.....,-1.'iti.;'.•:‘ ..'r::::•,1'''.•:,..'!:-•:',27:.').":..i.:••••:ii.i'i,Y1'4..':.•,':::;.'•'...:,',1:'.".;'.••.,3-'.i.i;,.,i'.,..A.,,d., ..,•, ' .. .. ..,.- •'i.....,!....f.•:......J.%•:.1k,,,. • • • '., . . .•',... . - 1,..,..,`,t,..'.••.., : •••'.'..,•' ,..:,-;... ,'•:„ •••''• .....t'•.-' ...•,,',Iiti,V,•• ••-1..,, '••'.........:1•Ie."?.:', ;'.•..-, ....'•,:q.-j :''.•1;:.•-•4'il"I. .:'. .•,..!:•;E'.t • ..':'..;.:.•.... '"'\' .f '.1.',f "(•".';••• 11-1°:':141':1:••• .--: .':. .. • •-tii...,C,. .. ' • !' ''.:••! .';.,•.':: ':' ....‘,..:.'' •i.'-'‘. . ,,44,4;•:',...:.. •• •...!..,..W•,.• • '..:..:.• ...r;: -t'.q, ',!..11•1••.V,,l'it'':•1",--!:....!/.. . • .,t!....1..f.3-•'..!"..;;.f-.'t;P:,..1.'..::...:.4...•••••'i'.It,iiik -.. .-; ,..;' • .,..-.3:•••• ....., •-• • ",- .. •••.........•'... -.... . . :• •• .,',-,-•41,4:rt,-•i..• •r,i,,,,4,,.,-,...... ..:. •:',..? i.••'.•1,....:;;;,-4.11, i;,:....:, ....f.....-...........,..,..:F.,,...:::-..:.....,..,..,,,,,,... .,...,- .....;i....:-„,,,,it.:;11,,r., . • - - . ,. i'..:1‘..,,(.: ,.. : • : ..'.- -- ' 111 :L1V\ 4?drkEiteaSiatj =''' CIT 'x OF RENTON Office of the City Attorney • Earl Clymer, Mayor Lawrence J. Warren August 21 , 1990 TO: Marilyn J. Petersen, City Clerk FROM: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RE : Rezone Ordinance from R-1 (Single-Family Residential) to R-3 (Medium Density Multi-Family) - Rodgers/Xenos;R-034- 90 Dear Marilyn: I am enclosing the original of the above-referenced ordinance. Lawrence J. Warren LJW:as . Encl . cc : Ways and Means Committee Mayor Clymer Council Presiydent Ron Nelson A8 . 60 : 14 . • Post Office Box 626 - 100 S 2nd Street-Renton, Washington 98057 - (206) 255-867R CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM R-1 (SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) TO R-3 (MEDIUM DENSITY MULTI-FAMILY) (RODGERS/XENOS; FILE NO. R- 034-90) . WHEREAS, under Chapter 31 ( Zoning) , of Title IV (Building Regulations) , of Ordinance No. 4260 known as the "Code of ,General Ordinances of the City of Renton, " as amended, and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the property hereinbelow described has heretofore been zoned as R-1 (Single-Family Residential) ; and WHEREAS, a proper petition for change of zone classification of said property has been filed with the Planning Division on or about November 14, 1989 , which petition was duly referred to the hearing examiner for investigation, study,y, and public hearing, and a public hearing having been held thereon on or about July 17, 1990, and said matter having been duly considered by the hearing examiner, and said zoning request being in conformity with the city' s comprehensive plan, as amended, and the city council having duly considered all matters relevant thereto, and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I . The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby rezoned to R-3 (Medium-Density Multi-Family) , as hereinbelow specified, subject to the findings, conclusions, and 1 ORDINANCE NO. decision of the hearing examiner dated July 27, 1990, and the Planning Manager is hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to evidence said rezoning, , to-wit: See, Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein 1. 66 (Said property, approximately 1 . 75 acres, being located at 1132 Edmonds Avenue N.E. ) subject to compliance with the conditions of the Environmental Review Committee. SECTION II . This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval,, and five days after its publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of 1990 . Marilyn J. Petersen, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of 1990 . Earl Clymer, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD. 167 : 8/21/90 :as . 2 1:3-03L-10 , . CITY OF RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE : 151 `4 0 TO : Mike D. * and/or Dave Tibbot** FROM: L P..M_�C B �d�. Ir. , Project Manager Department of Community Development SUBJECT/PROJECT: ' (;) -ttS PROJECT NUMBER: R Attached are THREE copies of and the above-referenced file. (Please note that the Public Works Department will not be able to review legal descriptions or other submittals received via FAX) Project Status/Review Stage : TAC Review (Preliminary) ERC Review V Final review (calculations and certification enclosed) Revisions to previously reviewed plans dated Other: This project was submitted in conjunction with the following other application type (s) : VI Rezone Site Plan Approval Variance Annexation Other: Please return your comments/determination to the Community Development Department (ATTN: Sandi Seeger, Administrative Assistant) by : c\ ' �Z. 'c 1 Thank you. * Mike has responsibility for review of preliminary and final review of legals , easements and off-site utility improvements . ** Dave has responsibility for final review of off-site utility improvements and mylars for all types of plats and property line adjustments TO: LENORE BLAUMA DATE 8/23/90 FROM: CITY CLERK'S OFFICE SUBJECT: Rodgers/Xenos Rezone Ordinance (R-034-90) Please furnish the following to the City Clerk's Office: Certification of Posting X Legal Description Certification of Valid PetitinsiON X Map pLANNINO Deed C1 OF REN�ON Pro Rata Share of Costs Easement AUG 2 3 1990 Restrictive Covenants X Verify. Content R' ,celvl Please verify content of the attached ordinance, legal description, and map for the subject property and initial your approval . Marilyn Petersen THANK YOU! Requested by: eethg-lea:).20 ,1444V ' ' CIT' J OF RENTON Office of the City Attorney Earl Clymer, Mayor Lawrence J. Warren August 21, 1990 TO: Marilyn J. Petersen, City Clerk FROM: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RE : Rezone Ordinance from R-1 (Single-Family Residential) to R-3 (Medium Density Multi-Family) - Rodgers/Xenos;R-034- 90 Dear Marilyn: I am enclosing the original of the above-referenced ordinance. Lawrence J. Warren LJW:as . Encl. cc : Ways and Means Committee Mayor Clymer Council Present Ron Nelson 0 A8 . 60 : 14 . Post Office Box 626 - 100 S 2nd Street-Renton, Washington 98057 (206) 255-8678 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM R-1 (SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) TO R-3 (MEDIUM DENSITY MULTI-FAMILY) (RODGERS/XENOS; FILE NO. R- 034-90) . WHEREAS, under Chapter 31 ( Zoning) , of Title IV (Building Regulations) , of Ordinance No. 4260 known as the "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, " as amended, and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the property hereinbelow described has heretofore been zoned as R-1 (Single-Family Residential) ; and WHEREAS, a proper petition for change of zone classification of said property has been filed with the Planning Division on or about November 14, 1989, which petition was duly referred to the hearing examiner for investigation, study, and public hearing, and a public hearing having been held thereon on or about July 17, 1990, and said matter having been duly considered by the hearing examiner, and said zoning request being in conformity with the city's comprehensive plan, as amended, and the city council having duly, considered all matters relevant thereto, and all parties having been heard appearing in. support thereof or in opposition thereto,; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS : SECTION I . The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby rezoned to R-3 (Medium-Density Multi-Family) , as hereinbelow specified, subject to the findings, conclusions, and 1 ORDINANCE NO. decision of the hearing examiner dated July 27 , 1990, and the Planning Manager is hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to evidence said rezoning, to-wit: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein (Said property, approximately 1 . 75 acres, being located at 1132 Edmonds Avenue N.E. ) subject to compliance with the conditions of the Environmental Review Committee. SECTION II. This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and five days after its publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of 1990 . Marilyn J. Petersen, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 1990 . Earl Clymer, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD. 167 : 8/21/90 :as . 2 • DESCRIPTION: G 6OL Th -THE -1/2 OF THE WEST 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST W.M. ; EXCEPT THE SOUTH 75 FEET THEREOF; AND EXCEPT THE WEST 30 FEET THEREOF FOR EDMONDS AVENUE NORTHEAST; SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. • PAGE 2 0797101 • t o� i 1 o '; i i . I -- ,---, /,•• t") / . z • 1111 .� 1 ,,( \ , . l'' 8 IN . - . &4,_1. F • . s H [ cv CC L �. "ems . r; a, � • ,,..„...t . ...: .. \ , ,4_. • . N \ 1 - J_ . N . •--. . . . . . .. , b xN . .. 1 ---- T----N ,c .............___......._ .,....:.______ , . .i... . ,„ 1 . • Cr I• : CC • • `\ 1 C 1\ Ct\ \ • . , • • Rodgers Rezone ECF:R-034-90 - • APPLICANT S. Michael Rodgers TOTAL AREA 1 .75 Acres • PRINCIPAL ACCESS Edmonds Ave NE EXISTING ZONING R-1 • . EXISTING USE Residential • PROPOSED USE Multiple Family Development COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN COMMENTS Located @ 1132 Edmonds Avenue N.E. • For.Use By City Clerk's Office Only A. I . # q.,:j • AGENDA ITEM RENTON CITY COUNCIL MEETING s = =-== _ SUBMITTING Dept./Div./Bd./Comm. Hearing Examiner's Office For Agenda Of August 1990 (Meeting Date) Staff Contact Fred J. Kaufman (Name) Agenda Status: SUBJECT: S. MICHAEL RODGERS/GEORGE XENOS: Consent R-034-90 - located at 1132 Edmonds Ave. NE. Public Hearing Correspondence Non-project Rezone of 1 .75 acres from R-1 to Ordinance/Resolution R-3 for possible future multi-family development. Old Business Exhibits: (Legal Descr. , Maps, Etc.)Attach• New Business A. See yellow file Study Session Other B. C. Approval : Legal Dept. Yes No N/A COUNCIL ACTION RECOMMENDED: Finance Dept. Yes No. N/A REFER TO WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE Other Clearance FISCAL IMPACT: Expenditure Required $ Amount $ Appropriation- $ Budgeted Transfer Required SUMMARY (Background information, prior action and effect of implementation) (Attach additional pages if necessary.) Hearing Examiner recommends City Council approval , subject to applicant meeting all of the conditions set out by the BRC. PARTIES OF RECORD/INTERESTED CITIZENS TO BE CONTACTED: see file. SUBMIT THIS COPY TO CITY CLERK BY NOON ON THURSDAY WITH DOCUMENTATION. =# CITY OF R,ENTON ..�t Hearing Examiner Earl Clymer, Mayor Fred J.Kaufman August 13 , 1990 George Xenos 1616 - 156th NE, Suite 115 Bellevue, WA 98008 RE: Rodgers/Xenos Rezone File No. R-034-90 Dear Mr. Xenos: The Examiner' s Report and Recommendation regarding the referenced request has not been appealed within the time period established by ordinance. Therefore, this matter is being submitted to the City Clerk this date for transmittal to the City Council for review. You will receive notification of final approval, as well as a copy of the enacting ordinance, from the City Clerk upon adoption by the City Council. You will be notified of all action taken by the City Council upon approval of the request. Please feel free to contact this office if further assistance or information is required. Sincerely, FRED J. KAUFMAN HEARING EXAMINER FJK:dk cc: City Clerk Building Division Planning Division Michael Rodgers _ , • 'Inner _ 1,111c\ n1[_'1[n2 1 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )ss. County of King DOTTY KLINGMAN , being first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and states: That on the 27th day of July , 1990 affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. /16, SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this a9.e4., day of C3ze....e.47 , 1990. Notary Pub is n and for the State of Washington, residing at , therein. Application, Petition, or Case I/: R-034-90 - S. MICHAEL RODGERS/GEORGE XENOS (The minutes contain a list of the parties of record.) July 27, 1990 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION APPLICANT: S. MICHAEL RODGERS/GEORGE XENOS File No: Rezone 034-90 LOCATION: 1132 Edmonds Avenue NE SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Non-project rezone of a 1.75 acre parcel from R-1 to R-3 for possible future multi-family development. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Planning Division Recommendation: Approval with conditions. PLANNING DIVISION REPORT: The Planning Division Report was received by the Examiner on July 10, 1990 PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Division Report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES The hearing was opened on July 17, 1990 at 11:15 A.M. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit #1 - Yellow File containing application, proof of posting and publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit #2 - Site Map Exhibit #3 - Assessors Map Exhibit #4 - Vacancy Rate Chart Exhibit #5 - Schematic showing mitigated access to site. LENORA BLAUMAN, Senior Planner with the Current Planning Division of the city opened the hearing with a presentation of the staff report. Her review follows. The site as shown on the Comprehensive Plan is designated for medium density residential use and is surrounded by single and multi-family uses as well as vacant property zoned commercial. The ERC reviewed this proposal and issued a Mitigated DNS (see conditions attached). If the property were developed (no plans have been submitted at this time), it could use the maximum permitted density of 43 units, add approximately 80 new residents, a maximum of 25 new school children, and create 262 traffic trips per day. Ms. Blauman said at this moment the site could support the maximum density in terms of traffic, but it is not likely maximum density could be achieved due to constraints on the site. Assuming development will eventually occur on the site the ERC is requesting the applicant provide a geotechnical soils study; provide a tree retention and landscape plan at the time of site plan review; and provide a traffic study for Edmonds Avenue and Northeast Sunset Blvd. addressing additional traffic impacts at that corridor, which will be provided again at the time of site plan review. The Examiner questioned how the decision-maker could make a recommendation to the city council when the traffic studies are going to be done subsequent to the recommendation to rezone the site. Blauman said the Traffic Division felt that with full maximum development at R-3 level, traffic from this site could be accommodated. What they were more concerned about was the specific mitigation measures that would best work at the time of development, and a traffic analysis at this point would not provide that information. . S. Michael Rodgers/George Xenos Rezone 034-90 July 27, 1990 Page 2 In reviewing the rezone criteria to be considered it was noted that currently the 1.75 acre parcel is developed with two small single-family homes and accessory buildings which were developed prior to annexation of the property into the city in 1959. The applicant is requesting zoning that is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the change is appropriate in keeping with surrounding uses. Blauman said Long Range Planning personnel are reviewing and updating the Comprehensive Plan at this time but it is believed the R-3 zoning designation will remain for this property. It is felt the studies proposed to be done for the site should contribute to the selection of mitigation measures for such matters as landscaping, traffic, and soil and vegetation retention. There should be no undue burden placed on city services; the site is outside of the Heather Downs moratorium district and outside the NE 3rd and 4th Street Benefit Zone. There have been no changes to the property since it was brought into the city, although the surrounding area has had expanded development in recent years. The city feels this area is desirable for future growth; schools can accommodate the proposed additional students; there is public transportation available in the area; the site is near public amenities, and access will be from NE 12th Street. The site slopes upward but there is adequate sight distance to accommodate residential development. Blauman also said staff feels this request is timely as the site is located in a developing area and will provide a good transition from residential and proposed commercial developments; it is considered an infill parcel with utilities and street improvements available. Recreational amenities are available, and the traffic engineering staff did report that although NE 12th Street and Sunset Blvd. are substantially travelled, even with maximum allowable density to this site there is no reason traffic impacts can not be mitigated - with specific mitigation measures to be • explored at the time of development. Blauman stated staff supports this rezone request subject to compliance with the ERC determination, and at the time of site plan review specific mitigation measures are to be set forth. Mr. George Xenos, one of the applicants, 1616 - 156th NE, Suite 115, Bellevue 98008 acknowledged his agreement with the staff report. He feels the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan for the city; meets environmental goals of the Plan and is compatible with the R-3 zoning to the north. Xenos also acknowledged any impacts from the proposal can be addressed during the site plan process and mitigated conditions can be attached to the final proposal at that time. He reviewed circulation, access, landscaping, soils, traffic, densities, public services, and said when the site plan is presented it will show they have incorporated the natural amenities of the site as well as the streetscape into the plan. Mr. Xenos feels their proposal will provide affordable housing for the city and requested the rezone application be approved. Further responding on behalf of the applicant was BARRY ANDERSON. P. O. Box 37. Kent 98035. Mr. Anderson said he was requested by the applicant to provide a schematic plan address concerns related to the mitigated topography access. He presented Exhibit #5 for review. DICK GAETNAIELLO, 1975 - 112th Avenue NE, Bellevue. 98004 addressed concerns expressed about potential crime and excessive police calls and stated due to the views from this property it is felt their residents will be of a high quality which should lessen concerns about crime/excessive police calls. MIKE RODGERS, 1111 NE 3rd, Bellevue, 98004, co-applicant, did not testify but wanted to introduce himself to staff and become a party of record for these proceedings. The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak, and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 11:55 A.M. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicants, S. Michael Rodgers and George Xenos, filed a request for approval of a rezone of approximately 1.75 acres of property from R-1 (Single Family; Lot size - 7,200 sq ft) to R-3 (Medium Density Multiple Family). 2. The yellow file containing the staff report, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. 3. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the City's responsible official, issued a Declaration of Non-Significance - Mitigated (DNS-M) for the subject proposal. The conditions imposed by the ERC required a soils analysis, tree retention plan and traffic analysis. 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. 5. The subject site is located at 1132 Edmonds Avenue N.E. The site is located two lots south of N.E. 12th Street and north of the intersection of Park Avenue N.E. (SR-900/Sunset Boulevard S. Michael Rodgers/George Xenos Rezone 034-90 July 27, 1990 Page 3 N.E.) and Old Sunset Boulevard. McKnight School is located just north of the site across N.E. 12th. 6. The subject site was annexed to the City with the adoption of Ordinance 1795 enacted in October, 1959. The site received its single family zoning at that time. 7. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of medium density multiple family uses, but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the Plan. 8. Two single family homes and accessory buildings are located on the site. The existing use of a single lot by two single family homes is a legal non-conforming use (pre-dating the adoption of the Zoning Code) and may be continued. These structures would remain until redevelopment under the proposed zoning. 9. The subject site slopes downward from the northeast to the southwest. The elevation ranges from approximately 330 feet down to approximately 300 feet. Staff has noted that steep driveway slopes may be a potential problem. The applicant has submitted a geotechnical report outlining the subsurface conditions of this sloped site. The report indicates that with special preparation the site can support apartment building construction. 10. The area reflects a wide range of zoning districts. The subject site is zoned R-1. Properties both north and south of the site are zoned R-3, the classification requested for the subject site. Immediately across Edmonds to the west is a B-1 (Business/Commercial) district, while an R-2 (Duplex Residential) district is located immediately east of the site. P-1 (Public/QuasiPublic) districts are one lot removed from the subject site both to the north (McKnight School) and to the south. 11. Development surrounding the site generally reflects the existing zoning in the area. An apartment complex is located on the northerly adjacent R-3 parcel and the Highlands Convalescent Center is located on the abutting R-3 property south of the site. Duplex units are located in the R-2 district east of the site. 12. The reclassification of the site to R-3 would permit the development of approximately 43 dwelling units. The potential population of such a development density would be approximately 80 residents. The school age population generally projected is .25 students per dwelling unit or approximately 11 students. The number of students may vary depending on the number of bedrooms per unit. The expected number of vehicle trips is 262 per day. 13. While the applicant did submit to staff an illustrative apartment plan, that plan was not submitted for review for this public hearing. CONCLUSIONS 1. The proponent of a rezone must demonstrate that the request is in the public interest, that it will not impair the public health, safety and welfare and in addition, complies with at least one of the criteria found in Section 4-8-14, which provides in part that: a. The subject site has not been considered in a previous area-wide rezone or land use analysis; or b. The subject site is potentially designated for the new classification per the Comprehensive Plan; or c. There has been a material and substantial change in the area in which the subject site is located since the last rezoning of the property or area. The requested classification is warranted and should be approved by the City Council. 2. The subject site has not been analyzed since zoning was initially applied to the site in 1959. It has not been reviewed for consistency with the Comprehensive Plan until this request was received. 3. The site is not only designated for medium density zoning by the Comprehensive Plan, but the site is located between two properties to the north and south, both zoned R-3, the zoning requested. These two R-3 properties also support medium density uses or their equivalent. The adjacent parcel to the north contains an apartment complex, while the abutting property to the south contains a convalescent complex approaching multiple family densities. , S. Michael Rodgers/George Xenos Rezone 034-90 July 27, 1990 Page 4 4. In addition, the property to the east is zoned for and contains duplex residential uses. The subject site, an island of single family zoning and use, is rather isolated from similar uses. The R-3 reclassification requested would permit the site to attain a character not unlike that of surrounding uses. 5. Obviously the use of the site for additional apartment construction will increase the range of residential choices for new residents, provide additional variety in housing types, and meet the growing demands for additional apartments. 6. Additional density will increase the demand on transportation corridors, parks, schools and other services provided by governmental agencies including the city and school district. The ERC has required that a traffic study and geotechnical study be conducted at the time the applicant submits a proposal for the site. While there is some reluctance to rezone parcels without first making such studies, the size of the site will not support a very large complex, thereby limiting the ultimate impact of this development. At the same time though, a series of similar relatively modest projects could begin to have a substantial impact on the provision of services. It might be prudent to first determine if there are either transportation or geotechnical constraints that might limit the density of a site prior to granting additional density. If the constraints (either traffic or geotechnical, or both) limit development potential to R-2 densities, that probably should be determined prior to reclassifying the site to R-3. After all, the zoning of the adjacent property to the east is R-2 and that zoning could also be suitable for the subject site. Therefore, in the future the ERC might wish to require the study of impacts of development before rezones are approved and density values vested. 7. In conclusion, the City Council should approve the proposed reclassification of the subject site from R-1 to R-3, but might want to determine if transportation studies, geotechnical or other studies that would otherwise constrain the potential densities of a site should be conducted prior to rezoning property rather than subsequent to granting the potential for increased density. RECOMMENDATION The City Council should approve the reclassification of the subject site from R-1 to R-3 subject to the following condition: 1. The applicant shall comply with the conditions imposed by the ERC. ORDERED THIS 27th day of July, 1990. k Z- FRED J. KA MAN HEARING EXAMINER TRANSMITTED THIS 27th day of July, 1990 to the parties of record: George Xenos 1616 - 156th NE, Suite 115 Bellevue, WA 98008 Barry Anderson P. O. Box 37 Kent, WA 98035 Dick Gaetanaiello 1975 - 112th Street NE Bellevue, WA 98004 Mike Rodgers 1111 NE 3rd Bellevue, WA 98004 S. Michael Rodgers/George Xenos Rezone 034-90 July 27, 1990 Page 5 TRANSMITTED THIS 27th day of July, 1990 to the following: Mayor Earl Clymer Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator Lynn A. Guttmann, Administrator Members, Renton Planning Commission Planning Manager Glen Gordon, Fire Marshal Ronald Nelson, Building Director Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Mayor's Executive Assistant Transportation Systems Division Valley Daily News Kim Scattarella, Engineering Specialist Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 15 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 P.M. August 10, 1990. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 16, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of $75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. / . %..;• • DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED MITIGATION MEASURES • PROJECT: Rodgers Rezone ' ' PROPONENT: George Xenos ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF;R 034-90 APPLICATION NUMBER: ECF;R 034-90 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Applicant seeks a non-project reclassification of a 1.75 acre parcel from R-1, Single-Family Use, to R-3, Multi-Family Use. The property Is currently developed with two single-family homes and • accessory buildings. Development of the site with a multi-family complex Is planned to take place at a future date; site plan approval is not sought at this time, however, a conceptual site plan is submitted for information only. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 1132 Edmonds Avenue-Northeast RECOMMENDATIONS: The Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of Non-Significance.-Mitigated with the following conditions: EARTH 1. That the applicant, in,:conjunction with environmental/site plan review for any specific'development project, will be required to provide a supplementary soils study to be approved by the Public Works Department and Building :Division to ensure compatibility of the proposed project.design with the underlying terrain. NATURAL ENVIRONMENT i 2. That the applicant, In conjunction with environmental/site plan review for any specific development project, will be required provide a tree retention plan and a landscaping plan to be approved by the Landscape Planner. No tree cutting will be permitted until site plan approval is achieved and a vegetation permit is obtained. TRAFFIC I 3. That the applicant, in conjunction with environmental/site plan review for any specific project, provide a traffic analysis for the Intersection of Edmonds Avenue/Northeast Sunset Boulevard, to be approved by the Public Works Department and the Police Department, to ensure that traffic impacts are sufficiently Identified 'and adequate mitigation measures established to provide appropriate levels of service at this intersection, with residential development on this site. . NOTE: The conceptual site plan submitted for potential future residential development on this lot has been reviewed and commented upon by staff. Staff recommends that a specific site plan Include reduced density, less steep access roads for commuting and emergency (particularly fire) vehicles and pedestrians, landscaping which would serve as a visual amenity and provide a buffer against light and glare, and off-site and on-site recreational amenities. At the time of development review (environmental and site plan), the applicant will be required to provide mitigation measures to address impacts to public services (e.g., emergency services, schools) and utilities. Additional mitigation measures • may also be required to address impacts Identified at the time of review of a specific site plan. mmdoc • '....i.:..111. ...411111•11M-.11MI MIMIIHMIIMM aillIlhiliill..... 1 NIMP •, ,• • 1 N._ _ \ L. 1 . • Ci ID . 1 , .t._,__J I- - 10. 1 w cf.) • z . ir..1 11111111 { �0s ' Op / ,. 4 \ • i 0n . El\ ~ 'k'�s. I• 0 CA ....‹. ...e.s.,... . ci, ,),...3,),.;, i• • ..:.: . 1..: .‘,.,:„..., _. , , L • \ . . . 1 -(i_ . . • , „6.,,,, \\ . c • • v • ....�....... ir:: _. • r CC I 1 I 1 I ` '7. \ . • Rodgers Rezone ECF:R-034-90 • APPLICANT S. Michael Rodgers . TOTAL AREA 1 .75 Acres • PRINCIPAL ACCESS Edmonds Ave NE EXISTING ZONING R-1 EXISTING USE Residential PROPOSED USE Multiple Family Development COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE ' PLAN COMMENTS Located @ 1132 Edmonds Avenue N.E. • • j .- .... i ,I _3 g - DAYTON AVE NE r , � 7.' • nos OM NM I ; f/' ,'/ DAY-TON CT NE i '�/ /() I // . ,//rN • .'ti/ ---y I R i3 %�� • - ._ EDMONDS � --2 :,.. .... ... .. .. . • .. 1 ."- APT APT 4 I� `'IN ..g ;;•-• ...• i' .,:c I - 1• O�, t APT � • • -� . \� P-1 % s05, GLEN WOOD AVE NE `- / I - ® SCALE: 1"=200' ----- A 1 11 -3 \\\\\\� R-1 ., Balma & Holmberg Inc. i N \ 1 • �j I ENGINEERS & SURVEYORS 1 IL—OMMaaur — - iT� 1 1 I II ' I I ' : I— Sb06 K Y. GILY12( BIND., svIrx 7 t t4410•0 H- I LSB211070N 96027 (206) DC2 - 0250 d G'•.1 C O O • ING XQ PYJ C r:;>:: :::>::::��:::::::: :: :;�<<::>::::< :::::::< :< ::>«::>:<:: :::::>'::>:::��::::::><:>::::<:::>:::::::::: : :::::`� ``'````-��:`:�:.�,�.:.:;<:: :.:.:.:.:.r'il'�•:th� ode h�app.icatian(�) list��t.�r�•.irt.order pf applipat�n�n•number only and:na:..:::;ecessa::.>y.;:::�.:.;:>;::.;::«...:>:;.;:;:..;:...:;:::: h :;:wall. ::h r. ;.It m ::will. . : II :f r.. :..•rm i r. i f.th :R ' rin Examiner>: >`: :< <::>: : PROJECT NAME: RENTON CROWN APARTMENTS PROJECT NUMBERS: ECF;R;SA-122-88 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Applications to rezone 7.57 acres of property from Business District (B-1) to Residential-Multiple Family and for site plan approval to allow the construction of an apartment complex with 111 dwelling units. PROJECT NAME: RODGERS REZONE PROJECT NUMBERS: ECF;R-034-90 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Applicant seeks a non-project reclassification of a 1.75 acre parcel from R-1, Single-Family Use, to R-3, Multi-Family Use. The property is currently developed with two single- family.homes and accessory buildings. Development of the site with a multi-family complex is planned to take place at a future date; site plan approval is not sought at this time, however, a conceptual site plan is submitted for information only. ..::.. •::..::..::..::..::.�::.•::.:.:.�:...................:::::::. . . xv I b ::.:.�:..::.•:::::..::.�:..::...�.::.:::::..:..::.•::..::::..:... ....:.:....'I`.'::.. �'.::SE12:V,1c,'�;.:::BY::>:MA•�•:L�ING::>;>;:>:: >:::::>:> :::::�; :::::::::::::::>:: >:::::::; On the /6 day of , 19/0 , I • deposited in the mail of t e United States a sealed envelope containing documents. This information was .sent to: Name Representing 4*4 • • • • • (Signature of Sender) Subscribed and sworn to /d me th s l a day of /rika,,,...fin 19,96 ! / I /� . Notar P bl ' in and or -the Sta o : W. iington siding - _ = at - A • therin. • - . .;:Pxa..;ec.t.;;.;Name:>::;::::;�:::. :�:<:; ::... .;;' ' :•:';;:�:;:.:;:;;:: :.»:::<:::::.:::•.>:::<.>;:.;.:;::::;:�;;;::;::•:;:�;;:.;:;<.:;;:•:•;:;;.:.:�:•:•:•:«�:;;:�:;�:;: • . ... ..... .. ..... :.., .....:. :P:ro::: ect::><N.umb.er:;;;;:::;.� :>. ^::r::> ;: >'>;::: .::;. ;..::::4:.':: :>::::<:5.;.:.::.;:.::; ::.:•:;.:.:>:.:•;:; ;:•:•::;;•:;:::>:.:::::::::::::. t / 6 • COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING APPLICANT: S. Michael Rodgers/George Xenos FILE NUMBER: R-034-90 LOCATION: 1132 Edmonds Avenue N.E. A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: Applicant seeks a non-project reclassification of a 1.75 acre parcel from R-1, Single-Family Use, to R-3, Medium Density, Multi-Family Use. (A conceptual site plan illustrating an option for future multi-family development is submitted for information only.) B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record: Elsie M. Seel 2. Applicant: S. Michael Rodgers/George Xenos 3. Existing Zoning: R-1, Single-Family Use 4. Existing Zoning in the Area: R-2, Low density multi-family; R-3, medium density, multi- family; P-1, Public Use; B-1, Commercial Use. 5. Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Medium Density, multi-family use 6. Size of Property: 1.75 acres 7. Access: Edmonds Avenue N.E. 8. Land Use: Two single-family dwellings and accessory units. 9. Neighborhood Characteristics: North: Multi-family use; church. East: Single-family, multi-family South: Highlands Convalescent Center West: Vacant C. HISTORICAL/BACKGROUND: Action File Ordinance Date Initial annexation --- 1795 10-7-59 D. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1. Utilities a. Water: A sixteen inch water main runs along Edmonds Ave. N.E. b. Sewer: An eight inch sanitary sewer line runs along Edmonds Ave. N.E. c. Storm Water Drainage: Storm water drains into-a catch basin on Edmonds Ave. N.E. and into an eighteen inch concrete pipe storm system. 2. Fire Protection: Provided by the City of Renton as per ordinance requirements. 3. Transit: This site is not served by Metro transit. The closest routes are Routes #107 and #108 which run along N.E. Park Drive. PRELIMINARY REPORT TC=-:.7E HEARING EXAMINER Rodgers Rezone PUBLIC HEARING July 17, 1990 Page 2 4. Schools: a. Elementary Schools: Highlands Elementary School is approximately one-half mile north of the site. b. Middle Schools: McKnight Junior High School is one block north of the site. c. High Schools: Hazen High School is approximately 2.5 miles east of the site. 5. Recreation: North Highlands Park is approximately one-half mile north of the site E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1. Section 4-31-5, R-1, Residential Zone. 2. Section 4-31-8A, R-3, Residential District. 3. Section 4-8-14 (C), Change of Zone Classification (Rezone). F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT: 1. Northeast Renton Plan, City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium, 1986 (pgs. 55- 60). 2. Residential Goal, City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium, 1986 (pgs. 14-16). G. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1. The applicant is requesting a non-project reclassification of a 1.75 acre parcel from R-1, Single-Family Use, to R-3, Medium Density, Multi-Family Use. The property is currently developed with two single-family homes and accessory buildings. Development of the site with a multi-family complex is planned to take place at a future (not yet certain) date. The proposed reclassification is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designation for the property and is consistent with zoning designations/uses on surrounding properties. For example, the property is bounded on the north by multi-family residential development, on the east by both single-family and multi-family residential uses, and on the south by a residential convalescent center. The property to the west, across Edmonds Avenue, is zoned for commercial use, but is presently vacant, with dense vegetation (trees and ground cover). 2. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43.21(C), 1971, as amended), the Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of Non- Significance-Mitigated on May 28, 1990,with the following conditions: a. That the applicant, in conjunction with environmental/site plan review for any specific development project, will be required to provide a supplementary soils study to be approved by the Public Works Department and Building Division to ensure compatibility of the proposed project design with the underlying terrain. b. That the applicant, in conjunction with environmental/site plan review for any specific development project, will be required to provide a tree retention plan and a landscaping plan to be approved by the Landscape Planner. No tree cutting will be permitted until site plan approval is achieved and a vegetation permit is obtained. c. ' That the applicant, in conjunction with environmental/site plan review for any specific project, provide a traffic analysis for the intersection of Edmonds Avenue/Northeast Sunset Boulevard, to be approved by the Public Works Department and the Police Department, to ensure that traffic impacts are sufficiently identified and adequate mitigation measures established to provide appropriate levels of service at this intersection, with residential development on this site. T PRELIMINARY REPORT T( E HEARING EXAMINER • Rodgers Rezone PUBLIC HEARING July 17, 1990 Page 3 NOTE: The conceptual site plan submitted for potential future residential development on this lot has been reviewed and commented upon by staff. Staff will likely recommend that a specific site plan include reduced density, less steep access roads for commuting and emergency (particularly fire) vehicles and pedestrians, landscaping which would serve as a visual amenity and provide a buffer against light and glare, and off-site and on-site recreational amenities. At the time of development review(environmental and site plan),the applicant will be required to provide mitigation measures to address impacts to public services (e.g., emergency services, schools) and utilities. Additional mitigation measures may also be required to address impacts identified at the time of review of a specific site plan. 3. Staff members from various departments have reviewed and approved the proposed classification in principle. Their comments have been attached and the content integrated into the report. 4. Section 4-8-14 (C) of the Zoning Ordinance lists three criteria that the Hearing Examiner is asked to consider, along with all other relevant information, in making a decision on a rezone application. a. That substantial evidence is presented demonstrating the subject reclassification appears not to have been specifically considered at the time of the last area land use analysis and area zoning. The subject property was annexed into the City of Renton in 1959. The structures presently located on the property were built prior to annexation; these structures do not conform with present development standards for single-family residences. b. That the property is potentially classified for the zone being requested pursuant to the policies set forth in the Comprehensive Plan and conditions have been met which would indicate the change is appropriate. The subject property is designated for Medium Density Residential Use on the Comprehensive Plan Map which was adopted in 1982. No changes were made to specific parcels in the area at the time the Map was adopted. The Comprehensive Plan Goals, Policies and Objectives for the City at large, and for Northeast Renton in particular (See 1986 Comprehensive Plan Compendium), also support multi-family development on this site and surrounding properties. In consideration of the Comprehensive Plan designation for this property (both with respect to the General Plan and the Northeast Renton Area Plan), an analysis was conducted, via Environmental Impact Statements, of effects likely to occur in conjunction with reclassification to and development with medium density multi- family residential use in this section of the community. Expected environmental impacts identified at that time for the properties in this section of Northeast Renton -- e.g., traffic at intersections with N.E. 12th Street and with Sunset Boulevard, aesthetics, public services, public utilities--were reported to be mitigable through environmental protection measures and land use development conditions (to be applied at the time of site plan review). Long-range Planning Division staff have indicated that the Comprehensive Plan designation and policies currently in place for area properties, will continue to be valid for the foreseeable future. City staff from various departments have reviewed the present, non-project, programmatic rezone and have indicated that this action is supportable under the existing Comprehensive Plan Goals, Policies and Objectives. Impacts expected to occur at the time of future development are anticipated to be mitigable with measures recommended in conjunction with Environmental Review Committee evaluation for this reclassification and measures recommended in conjunction with site plan review for a specific future development application. For example, studies(e.g., traffic study, supplementary soils study) should serve as a basis for selection of mitigation measures, (e.g., right-of-way improvements, retention of natural vegetation) which are necessary to improve the property and adjacent off- site area so that there is no undue burden on City services, and so that a proposed development is attractive, safe and functional. PRELIMINARY REPORT HEARING EXAMINER Rodgers Rezone PUBLIC HEARING July 17, 1990 Page 4 c. That since the most recent previous zoning/land use analysis of the area in which the subject property is located, authorized public improvements, permitted private development or other circumstances affecting the subject property have undergone significant and material change.. The subject property has been extremely stable with respect to zoning, development and use since its original incorporation into the City of Renton in 1959. The current single-family residential designation was established at the time of annexation. No changes to land use action have been made to the property since annexation;the existing residential units are now in a state of disrepair. The area in which the subject property is located, however, has experienced increased development in recent years. Indeed, the Northeast Section of Renton, in which the site is located, has experienced a greater degree of residential growth than any other section of the City. Multi-family residential uses (many of them less than five years old) occur throughout the area. Staff anticipate that this trend toward an increasing level of multi-family development will continue because the area is attractive and is accessible to local services and employment centers. Public services and infrastructure are available to serve the site, with development at an allowable level of density, with multi-family residential use in accord with R-3 developments standards (4-31-8A) and the Site Plan Review Ordinance (4-31-33). The City is, in fact, encouraging applicants to develop in those sections of Northeast Renton (such as that in which the subject property is located) which are not within the boundaries of the Heather Downs Moratorium District. d. The final test to determine whether a rezone is appropriate is to address the question of "timeliness." Is it appropriate to rezone the subject property at this time? The proposed rezone is considered to be timely for the following reasons: 1) The subject property is located in an area which is developed (or permitted to be developed) primarily with multi-family uses and in which there is a market for additional multi-family development. 2) The subject property is situated between parcels to the north and east designated for multi-family use, parcels to the west designated for commercial use and a parcel to the south, which is used for residential care. Under these present and likely future circumstances; staff believe that the subject parcel is not appropriate for the now permitted single- family use, but would be well-suited for multi-family residential development, which could function effectively as a transitional use between nearby low-density multi-family uses and abutting non-residential uses. 3) Based upon surrounding uses and residential development goals, the proposed action is characterized as an "infill" rezone -- as the subject property is essentially vacant, but located in an area in which developed properties predominate and in which there are adequate public services and facilities to support additional development (see G.4.d.4. for further discussion). 4) Public utilities, street improvements and public services are presently available to serve the site with allowable density levels (maximum of 25 units per developable acre or 43 units/80 new residents) [*] and to serve other developments presently located in/planned for the area. The City is implementing plans for additional improvements to accommodate likely future growth in this area. Fire Prevention Bureau staff and the Police Department staff both report that calls to the site for emergency services are anticipated to occur at the • customary rate with future development which is designed to meet Zoning Ordinance standards (4-31-8A, 4-14, 4-31-33, 4-31-34), Building Regulations and Fire Code guidelines. =T PRELIMINARY REPORT TO`i riE HEARING EXAMINER Rodgers Rezone PUBLIC HEARING July 17, 1990 Page 5 Schools in the local area -- Highlands Elementary and Hillcrest Elementary, McKnight Middle School, and Hazen High School -- have sufficient resources to accommodate the anticipated 25 new students at allowable maximum development of this site. North Highlands Park is located within one-half mile of the site. Public utilities, including water mains, storm sewers, sanitary sewers and electric lines are adequate as currently provided, or can be readily improved to accommodate maximum allowable development on this site. Traffic engineering staff report that N.E. 12th Street and Sunset Boulevard, the nearest arterial roadways, are substantially travelled. Development of the property at maximum allowable density could be expected to generate up to +/- 263 ADWVTEs. At the time of development, a traffic study will be required --that study will be expected to provide information on impacts and suitable mitigation measures. Development densities/mitigation measures will be established to ensure that there is no substantial reduction in levels of service from development of this site [*] Staff may recommend that the applicants enter into agreements with the City, at the time of future site plan review, to participate in improvements to utilities, roadways and public services, as deemed necessary and appropriate by the City, in order to ensure adequate services to the site and the surrounding community. Also, at the time of development, the applicant will be required to implement other mitigation measures established in conjunction with site plan review,for protection of terrain and natural vegetation. 5) The proposed non-project reclassification would allow implementation of a future plan for multi-family residential uses on this site as permitted under the Comprehensive Plan. Any development plan for multi-family residential use on this property would be subject to approval by the City, under Sections 4-31-8A and 4-31-33 of the Zoning Ordinance. [*] At the time of site plan review, precise density limitations will be established for this parcel, based upon the Site Plan Review criteria defined in the Zoning Ordinance (4-31-33) and upon other applicable plans, policies and ordinances. H. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION: Based upon the above analysis, staff proposed that the Hearing Examiner recommend to the City Council the approval of the reclassification of the subject property to R-3, medium density residential zone (File No. 034-90), subject to the following condition: 1) That the applicant comply with the Environmental Review Committee's Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated, issued on May 28, 1990. NOTE: The City's Zoning Ordinance and Environmental Review Ordinance, as well as SEPA, mandate environmental review and site plan review at the time of submittal of a specific development proposal for this site. Therefore, no recommendation is made at this time for requiring such development review. / • 7 c 7 ' I • cn ou_ . 0 z 1 : ~ ' L. I TI!I...i ;; •1P. 1.I.F :_ I LI ill l OO \ ' • Oo I ' ....mr.....Y. 1... D \ O C \s• N .�\ s )10-60.•-•••••-...............M.MOJINEM. 40.10--- 1 ------------.\*.ii.Ni. T. . I' , I 7 \ • Rodgers Rezone ECF:R-034-90 . • APPLICANT S. Michael Rodgers TOTAL AREA 1 .75 Acres • PRINCIPAL ACCESS Edmonds.-Ave. NE - EXISTING ZONING R-1 1 EXISTING USE Residential PROPOSED USE . Multiple Family Development COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE- PLAN COMMENTS Located @ 1132 Edmonds Avenue N.E. L. - • •: - , 1 J . . . , . ,i; .. DAYTON AVE NE i r- / /..' - • / �� • ,' t , • DAYTON CT NE I ; 1 ,, t R-1 : , /ram : . J EDMONDS , .�:�' '� �I ::::,....1r..'"?:"*..1....-:::::;, APTJL :T • . VS..; 17 :P. -- '-. :.4*. I - • ?u`j V APT �\ I ,\ `Iti, P-1 r • GLEN WOOD A VE NE `- i// 1� n • - A_/ SCALE: 1"=200' . 1 I � ''3 \\\\• \. R_1 • ► alma & Holmberg Inc. •!..• • � Lin —; Imo- ENGINEERS &c SURVEYORS 1506 XT. atu rr BLVD., SURE 7 1 ( 11 I I I i . AQUAE TA�7Ofl (zoo) z ozrk — • DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED MITIGATION MEASURES • PROJECT: Rodgers Rezone PROPONENT: George Xenos ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF;R 034-90 APPLICATION NUMBER: ECF;R 034-90 • DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Applicant seeks a non-project reclassification of a 1.75 acre parcel from R-1, Single=Family Use,to R-3, Multi-Family Use. The property Is currently developed with two single-family homes and accessory buildings. Development of the site with a multi-family complex Is planned to take place at a future date; site plan approval Is not sought at this time, however, a conceptual site plan Is submitted for information only. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 1132 Edmonds Avenue"Northeast RECOMMENDATIONS: The Environmental Review Committee Issued a Determination of Non-Significance.-Mitigated with the following conditions: EARTH 1. That the applicant,: in::conjunction with environmental/site plan review for any specific-development project, will be required to provide a supplementary soils study to be approved by the Public Works Department and Building Division to ensure compatibility of the proposed project'design with the underlying terrain. NATURAL ENVIRONMENT 2. That the applicant, in conjunction with environmental/site plan review for any specific development project, will be required • provide a tree retention plan and a landscaping plan to be approved by the Landscape Planner. No tree cutting will be permitted until site plan approval is achieved and a vegetation permit is obtained. TRAFFIC I 3. That the applicant, in conjunction with environmental/site plan review for any specific project, provide a traffic analysis for the Intersection of Edmonds Avenue/Northeast Sunset Boulevard, to be approved by the Public Works Department and the Police Department, to ensure that traffic impacts are sufficiently Identified •and adequate mitigation measures established to provide appropriate levels of service at this Intersection, with residential development on this site. NOTE: The conceptual site plan submitted for potential future residential development on this lot has been reviewed and commented upon by staff. Staff recommends that a specific site plan Include reduced density, less steep access roads for commuting and emergency (particularly fire) vehicles and pedestrians, landscaping which would serve as a visual amenity and provide a buffer against light and glare, and off-site and on-site recreational amenities. At the time of development review (environmental and site plan), the applicant will be required to provide mitigation measures to address impacts topublic services e.p ( g., emergency services, schools) and utilities. Additional mitigation measures • may also be required to address impacts identified at the time of review of a specific site plan. ' T � mmdoc . - • RENTCY '.:OMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEr 'TMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF- 034-90 APPLICATION NO (S) . : R-034-90 PROPONENT: George J. Xenos • PROJECT TITLE: Rodgers Rezone BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks to reclassify a 1. 75 acre parcel from R-1, Single-Family Use, to R-3 , Medium Density Multi-Family Use, consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The property is currently developed with a single-family home and accessory buildings, which will be demolished if reclassification is achieved, and the property will be then be developed with a multi-family complex; a conceptual site plan has been provided for information only. LOCATION: 1132 Edmonds Avenue N. E . TO: • PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 5/4/90 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • • BUILDING DIVISION • PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P.M. ON APRIL 18 , 1990 . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED Z-i/4- -Cf /` ? LJ / 6E: Al <,,..„„ -t-e-;••• , • I ) -C: z-.7" ,_•„; 7 •::> 17' F". ir). 7- 7-21 4„. (7.1) 3 7-- • _ DATE' 474-:// / SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR UTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE , REV. 6/88 b , RENTZ.. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DE .TMENT. t ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLISTt REVIEW SHEET • REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: UJO u-t-11 t TIlf . DATE CIRCULATED: 4/4/90 COMMENTS DUE:_4/18/90_ ECF 034-90 APPLICATION NO (S) : R-034-90 PROPONENT: George J. Xenos PROJECT TITLE: Rodgers •Rezone • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks reclassification of a 1 . 75 acre parcel from R-1 , Single-Family Use to R-3 , Multi-Family Use, consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The property is currently deeloped with a single-family home and accessory buildings , which will be demolished if • reclassification is achieved, - and the property will then be developed with a multi-family complex. a conce(tual site plan has been provided for information only. LOCATION: 1132 Edmonds Avenue SITE AREA 1 . 75 acre ' BUILDING AREA (gross) : N/A IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1 . Earth ° ° ° ° 2 . Air ° ° ° 3 . Water ° ° ° 4 . Plants • 5 . Animals ° ° ° 6 . Energy & Natural Resources 7 . Environmental Health ° ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° 9 . Housing ° • 10 . Aesthetics ° 11 . Light & Glare - ° 12 . Recreation ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° ' ° ° 14 . Transportation ° 15 . Public Services ° ° ° ° • 16 . Utilities ° � ° COMMENTS : PLAi-4NING DiVISiOr! crfi i)t- r,r.:r, rn i W ATC-2NAi1 11-kP(ZWE14E14"CS ARE �E G:Li(QW1) • r-CiR .sl'CE• b'vc laPF{.t-- ;� • /0\()) P14A14S \-kU ? SuP5M(Tifo vYL teviEW . : ,-.: ' L...-r-r):") / / • • We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas - in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly a$sess .this proposal . • ["DDO ' A�Ou • / 1-1 l / 90 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date RENT01 - "OMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEP 'DMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF- 034-90 APPLICATION NO (S) . : R-034-90 PROPONENT: George J . Xenos PROJECT TITLE: Rodgers Rezone BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks to reclassify a 1 . 75 acre parcel from R-1, Single-Family Use, to R-3 , Medium Density Multi-Family Use, consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The property is currently ' ` developed with a single-family home and accessory buildings, which will be demolished if reclassification is achieved, and the property will be then be developed with a multi-family complex; a conceptual site plan has been provided for information only. LOCATION: 1132 Edmonds Avenue N.E. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 5/4/90 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATI.ON SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P.M. ON APRIL 18 , 1990 . • REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: VVAM LITILI1`( -HGN • APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED PoR Rn-oisse ONLY. WAteamw 11-11)VVI6het-'fs WiL..L se 2uiRE9 Fog PRoPose9 D& L-oPr-t6i-ir PLAP MUS'( PEE SU a irret. PoR 12-V%FuJ nice. -17) S Ii ➢C v Lo?r-1ENT y -1e PLAil p12.0P0s D 42 Nor A? -P A-a sear+ircE�o • U AWO 6Af()LAV DATE A1'121- 18, t O SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 FEE APPLICATION: . ,DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIE -SHEET EY ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIE, HEFT • �-1 PLAN REVIEW ROUTING SLIP :, • OTHER / DATE: / �/ - - -1 APPLICANT: I12eL� C.6 1,�14 GGr� t l2-d. '`. .�.y�-1— / c' c JOB ADDRESS: //._�� . < , NATURE OF WORK: 4-7L.72 ( ) PROPERTY MANAGEMENT. `-- -/?- �D DATE RECEIVED Comments Due BY PROPERTY MGMT. Comments or suggestions regarding this application should be provided in writing. Please provide comments to the Comm. Dev. Dept. (C.D.D. ) by 5:00 p.m. on above date. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION (' Lo1J�- �, (, FEES APPLIED CANNOT APPLY FEES • ❑ LEGAL DESCRIPTION NEED MORE INFORMATION ❑ SQUARE FOOTAGE ❑ FRONT FOOTAGE ❑ VICINITY MAP It is the intent of this development fee analysis to put the developer/owner on notice, that the fees quoted below will apply to the subject site upon development of the property. All quoted fees are due and payable at the time the construction permit is issued to install the on-site and off-site. improvements (i .e. underground utilities, street improvements, etc. ) PROJECT COST LATECOMER LATECOMER AGREEMENT - WATER NO PER'. ' FTG. FEE CITY HELD v)-c., L.•/ 23% ' PRIVATE DEVELOPER HELD LATECOMERS AGREEMENT - SEWER CITY HELD PRIVATE DEVELOPER DEVELOPER HELD ---• -- SPECIAL UTILITY CONNECTION CHARGE - WATER UNITS SUCC FEE Single family residential dwelling unit $300/lot x Apartment, Condo, each multiplex unit $175/ea. unit x -'2.• '? Commercial/Industrial $.04/sq. ft. of property x SPECIAL UTILITY CONNECTION CHARGE - SEWER Single family residential dwelling unit $300/lot x Apartment, condo, each multiplex unit $175/ea. unit x 1Q. '7 _.5n. 0O * Commercial/Industrial $.04/sq.ft. of property x SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT (Hospital Area) WATER UNITS SAD FEE DEVELOPMENTS WITH 1500 GPM FIRE FLOWS OR LESS: Area Charge $0.034\per/sq.ft. x Frontage Charge $16.00 per front ft. x DEVELOPMENTS WITH GREATER/THAN 1500 GPM FIRE FLOWS: Area Charge $0..048' pe`r sq.ft. x Frontage Charge $'18.00\per front ft. x �� y SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT (Honey Crk. Intercptr) - SEWER UNITS SAD FEE AREA CHARGES: Residential dwelling units, apartments or equivalent .; $250 per dwelling unit x Commercial development: • $.05 per sq. ft.. of/gross site area x FRONT FOOTAGE CHARGES:/ \ $37. 19 per Front Ft\ (on ea. side) x $74.38 per fr/ft. (p.rpty on both sides of imprv.) x 4e-,.+c- /r(90 . TOTAL: $ /7/ I. 0/ The above quoted fees do NOT include inspection fees, side sewer permits, r/w permit fees or the cost of water meters. )'//(. DATE `t. - /.Z— CIO Signature of Director or Authorized Rlpresentati.ve ' RENTC - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DE: TMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: o/\_m U D t DATE CIRCULATED: 4/4f90 COMMENTS DUE:_4/18/90_ ECF 034-90 APPLICATION NO (S) : R-034-90 PROPONENT: George J. Xenos PROJECT TITLE: Rodgers Rezone . BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks reclassification of a 1 . 75 acre parcel from R-1 , Single-Family Use to R-3 , Multi-Family Use, consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The property is currently deeloped with a single-family home and accessory buildings , which will be demolished if reclassification is achieved, and the property will then be developed with a multi-family complex. a conceltual site plan has been provided for information only. LOCATION: 1132 Edmonds Avenue' SITE AREA 1. 75 acre BUILDING AREA (gross) : N/A IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1 . Earth ° ° ° ° 2 . Air ° ° ° 3 . Water X ° ° 4 . Plants ° ° 5 . Animals ° ° o ° ° 6 . Energy & Natural Resources ° o ° ° 7 . Environmental Health ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° ° 9 . Housing 0 ° ° ° • - 10 . Aesthetics ° ° o ° ° 11 . Light & Glare ° 12 . Recreation ° ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° 14 . Transportation ° o ° ° 15 . Public Services ° ° o ° ° 16 . Utilities ° x ° + I 1` f t't_i�::: .•:s U V{Siun COMMENTS : r f ors :.i o I I be sob YN I 1 e(J. v,, _2 2 'r ?( ,JZ CI�r .Sh C er. :r t.1 r,7J le j n s f r m f /1 s( ) I b.(: rrr ;<-.9 ~;t;sr 4 j>n I..I'. -..),1 r-, ( , We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal . / -4,11- k. -,d _ / ' Y q-lb .-10 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative (1, ' Date • RENTOryDMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEP 'MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET •ECF- 034-90 APPLICATION NO (S) . : R-034-90 • PROPONENT: George J. Xenos PROJECT TITLE: Rodgers Rezone BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks to reclassify a 1. 75 acre parcel from R-1, Single-Family Use, to R-3 , Medium Density Multi-Family Use, consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The property is currently developed with a single-family home and accessory buildings, which will be demolished if reclassification is achieved, and the property will be then be developed with a multi-family complex; a conceptual site plan has been provided for information only. LOCATION: 1132 Edmonds Avenue N.E. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 5/4/90 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P.M. ON APRIL 18 , 1990 . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: • APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS _ ` NOT APPROVED 1I — .5-Forrl �'�" �l'J i Sows G,r,I I8 chap-,,�:1(, (f,,t rfir. S�or r: line- oir7 (,�i�rd No n I C. dw,o �� S w n ;C.. J /' y , cri\cv(i • pI f) e CkY1Ci. F .'rcr! d i � ,. 1 �,.r ; ,C, ;` �: :'/ /i.l''i ? �i•'>'' .'�' / D ��'v1 it/t'rG✓ /ce-Te^-i-(O' e,I( ✓i;aa/I („ ( /Y; tp f •1{' KI Of/ Cc SN rrn e( ( ry:„ (r ,J I V !I bc li ` '�r'•�� J l! II; YIC./06 `'' 1 (1EIl ° I' JGi"J(, UCtY �hy'el ( li, fin,• s).)i1d,(). , :'`fi ,.. Am' ac e 4'a (e -Prvq014(7 i�:r1, S� C�1ri•^' `i� i.0 �"(�;, jrol �'(tr, a, jl JUbm III{01 +0 ��'b I i<_ VvorIK .JV � r ..J �� ., ' v°s nt I - A 8aP"r � (t f� I � W� � G' J����, �cr';o r C ! J I-(�, ,�, ,,cL; . a I ) ve ! S ) �G1 11 I, 1 ( Uf t °; ! , , 14 7 S 'Or h `c 15 v)c d. r� I Yl of e $ 5+-e'r-1 n•10�� 1 )>,n, > �,�i-- 7 v . 1'✓•r.. . r � //LY►1 C 40/Ld DATE 'fr 7 -1(i ` 1v o SIGNATURE OF DIR 6TO OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 RENTvr ',OMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DE , TMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Seck)ex U- - `(�-s DATE CIRCULATED: 4 4 90 COMMENTS DUE: 4/18/90 ECF 034-90 APPLICATION NO (S) : R-034-90 PROPONENT: George J. Xenos PROJECT TITLE: Rodgers Rezone BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks reclassification of a 1 . 75 acre parcel from R-1 , Single-Family Use to R-3 , Multi-Family Use, consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The property is currently deeloped with a single-family home and accessory buildings , which will be demolished if reclassification is achieved, and the property will then be developed with a multi-family complex. a conceltual site plan has been provided for information only. LOCATION: 1132 Edmonds Avenue SITE AREA 1. 75 acre BUILDING AREA (gross) : N/A IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° ° 0 o ° ° 2 . Air ° ° o o 3 . Water 0 O O O 4 . Plants O O ° 5 . Animals 6 . Energy & Natural Resources 0 ° ° 7 . Environmental Health 0 0 ° O O ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° 0 9 . Housing 0 0 o O O 1.0 . ' Aesthetics 0 11 . Light & Glare 12 . Recreation • 0 0 ° ° ° 13 . Historic &Cultural Preservation 0 14 . Transportation 0 0 ° 15 . Public Services 0 o O O 16 . Utilities ° COMMENTS : y ar 0 1_161 C�� �" �L� l PvV i 1c'�J �-t�I = Fic N j'c•h' to We have reviewed this application with particular attention-to -those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal . k://, 4 r-5,4') Signature of Director or Authorized Representative 0 Date ( '' RENT0i7- - '0MMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DE F_ -�TMENT • • DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF- 034-90 APPLICATION NO (S) . : R-034-90 PROPONENT: George J . Xenos PROJECT TITLE: Rodgers Rezone BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks to reclassify a 1. 75 acre ' parcel from R-1, Single-Family Use, to R-3 , Medium Density Multi-Family Use, consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The property is currently developed with a single-family home and accessory buildings , which will be demolished if reclassification is achieved, and the property will be then be developed with a multi-family complex; a conceptual site plan has been provided for information only. LOCATION: 1132 Edmonds Avenue N.E. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 5/4/90 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCH, 'rEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY 'DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P.M. ON APRIL 18 , 1990 . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS )C NOT APPROVED • z�E R,.41,A6 D t1 2al'z: > (- V��tiYi. A2. l R-tS ��r__t�(�7�Lt;-,0V- 12*-4(e-L-t-) 1/ j > i7 /4/1• c DATE ,% ;/ SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRES NTATIVE / / / REV. 6/88 A. RENTC,,' 7.OMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DE'q `',TMENT • ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: �.G1(G3� :::• L",:``', r DATE CIRCULATED: 4/4/90 COMMENTS DUE:_4/18/90_''° .(c . ECF 034-90 . 07 r1 ` `` . :tom APPLICATION NO (S) : R-034-90 i " : • A•P F� - :J:�0 PROPONENT: George J. Xenos • til,. . • PROJECT TITLE : Rodgers Rezone ------- """"-.-- BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks reclassification of a 1 . 75 acre parcel from R-1, Single-Family Use to R-3 , Multi-Family Use , consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The property is currently deeloped with a single-family home and accessory buildings , which will be demolished if reclassification is achieved , and the property will_ then be developed with a multi-family complex. a conce[tual site plan has been provided, for information only. LOCATION: 1132 Edmonds Avenue . • SITE AREA 1 . 75 acre BUILDING AREA (gross) :_N/A IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE . MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION • IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY • 1 . Earth • ° ° • 2 . Air ° o ° ° 3 . Water ° .. _ 4 . Plants ° 5 . Animals ° ° 6 . Energy & Natural Resources 0 ° o ° ° 7 . Environmental Health ° ° ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° ° 9 . , Housing ° 10 . Aesthetics ° 11. Light & Glare ° ° • ° ° 12 . Recreation • � ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° 14 . Transportation . ° o O ° 15 . Public Services ° o ° ° 16 . Utilities ° COMMENTS : )ti �... ' I.. . .'. • . !? • ...... / �� 7-/-,•.:i '7'1 ••• ? ei ..('-' ..••••:'. ! '• • . ' - ,•••• '•vn; 6-• Y4-7,.1 /40. ep---- . '-:.,-3 il•-••--;,•.‘,.. -,:.,, . ..�./; G l� ""t if . j c� •� c✓ S We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas w e additional information is needed to properly assess this propos . ; ,. `Signature of Direc or or Authorized Representative Date • RENTOr,-r,OMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DE , ---._!'MENT DEVELd MENT APPLICATION REVIEQVT'HEET ECF- 034-90 APPLICATION NO (S) . : R-034-90` . ;- PROPONENT: George J . Xenos PROJECT TITLE: Rodgers Rezone _.• BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks to reclas.sity—a•'-1. 75 acre parcel from R-1, Single-Family Use, to R-3 , Medium Density Multi-Family Use, consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The property is currently developed with a single-family home and accessory buildings, which will be demolished if reclassification is achieved, and the property will be then be developed with a multi-family complex; a conceptual site plan has been ' provided for information only. LOCATION: 1132 Edmonds Avenue N.E . TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 5/4/90 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P.M. ON APRIL 18 , 1990 . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: • APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED • DATE SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR .OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE -'� REV. 6/88 ' REND ' . ` COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT • DL:- 2TMENT `�`-`''" "" `'�''" 'on' v . ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: C ;(3rc`r11- --1-'I'a.nv- DATE CIRCULATED: 4/4/90 COMMENTS DUE :_4/18/90_ ECF 034-90 ' APPLICATION NO (S) : R-034-90 PROPONENT: George J. Xenos • PROJECT TITLE: Rodgers Rezone • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant, seeks reclassification of a 1 . 75 acre parcel from R-1, Single-Family Use to R-3 , Multi-Family Use , consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The property is currently deeloped with a single-family home and accessory buildings , which will be demolished if reclassification is achieved, and the property will then be developed with a multi-family complex. a conceltual site plan has been provided for information only. • LOCATION: 1132 Edmonds Avenue SITE AREA 1 . 75 acre ' BUILDING AREA (gross) : N/A IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR .,' MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° ° ° ° • 2 . Air ° ° ° ° 3 . Water ° ° ° ° 4 . Plants ° ° 5 : Animals ° ° ° 6 . Energy & Natural .Resources o • ° ° 7 . Environmental Health • 0 ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use 9 . Housing ° ° ° 10 . Aesthetics ° o ° ° 11 . Light & Glare ° ° ° 12 . Recreation ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° 14 . Transportation ° o ° ° 15 . Public Services ° ° O • ° ° • 16 . Utilities - ° ° COMMENTS : CI . Y" 1U0 N) V.; i , K�l-', - %Lt i(,U R(6 Y)1 L{LI1 T-\ '‘1u1►u'l C\r '1 P W1l� utRc6 4%CiSffuiup L �:1\x)liz,Dro`rvlei fl Z.-�)I Y. '�4i S t`- 4`-,c N P-,Dp «c f'4 -,- U•(?)p.11 tf t4/ P--;Roc,.1��A l c I, 1 -e--) FOSS 1 LL U1►ti 1-1S 1 ,75 $ 'G� 4' ut KAM r-�.A,�., \-1,-1 ‘')"1 i P We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal . -1 -.r' O -12A n �_�)=.1 At--A, 4- � Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date • RENToix, MMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEP;' )MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF- 034-90 APPLICATION NO (S) . : R-034-90 PROPONENT: George J . Xenos PROJECT TITLE: Rodgers Rezone • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks to reclassify a 1. 75 acre parcel from R-1, Single-Family Use, to R-3 , Medium Density Multi-Family Use, consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The property is currently developed with a single-family home and accessory buildings, which will be demolished if reclassification is achieved, and the property will be then be developed with a multi-family complex; a conceptual site plan has been provided for information only. LOCATION: 1132 Edmonds Avenue N.E . TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 5/4/90 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P.M. ON APRIL 18 , 1990 . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: ( )1)n-\-ri.)-1 MPt\\\K)tll ;rn APPROVED V APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED `r �1' "\t..'JO(1) 10o16 CoK)c p-f(AL 73)16 PUk,c rvcT -,.:PPr ovcf V M), \ n M DATE 4_, 1 ! C?o SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 . • RENTC '',COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DE .TMENT 'L.:;: , i • • ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ^.,,c� , . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: yy�� `` ��� 1 ��l t 11d li i,,. DATE CIRCULATED: 4/4/90 COMMENTS DUE:_4/18/90_ - , . • ECF 034-90 I . . _. -• .� I J APPLICATION NO (S) : R-034-90 I j1 )� �� !�+ (;� I; I; i PROPONENT: George J. Xenos I I' 1' APR ' :' ; PROJECT TITLE: Rodgers Rezone i BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks reclassifi4tion of a 1 . 75 acre parcel from R-1 , Single-Family Use to R-3 , Multi-Family Use, consistent ' with the Comprehensive Plan. The property is currently deeloped with a single-family home and accessory buildings , which will be demolished if reclassification is achieved, and the property will then be developed with a multi-family complex. a conceltual site plan has been provided for information only. LOCATION: 1132 Edmonds Avenue • SITE AREA 1. 75 acre BUILDING AREA (gross) :_N/A . IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION • IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY • 1 . Earth. • ° 2 . Air ° O ° ° 3 . Water 0 ° 4 . Plants ° ° 5 . Animals . ° 6 . Energy & Natural Resources ° 7 . Environmental Health ° O ° ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° 9 . Housing ° ✓ ° ° • 10 . Aesthetics ° 11 . Light & Glare ° 12 . Recreation ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° 14 . Transportation ° 15 . Public Services ° ° 16 . Utilities ° COMMENTS : • We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. 7 /-/ /... 7 l Signatilre. of Director or' Authorized Representative Date • .RENTO_. -^IMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEP, ,.y MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION •REVIEW SHEET ECF- 034-90 APPLICATION NO (S) . : R-034-90 PROPONENT: George J . Xenos PROJECT TITLE: Rodgers Rezone BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks to reclassify a 1. 75 acre parcel from R-1, Single-Family Use, to R-3 , Medium Density Multi-Family Use, consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The property is currently developed with a single-family home and accessory buildings, which will be demolished if reclassification is achieved, and the property will be then be developed with a multi-family complex; a conceptual site plan has been provided for information only. LOCATION: 1132 Edmonds Avenue N. E. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 5/4/90 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P.M. ON APRIL 18 , 1990 . `}) / REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: (OLD L„ APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ?< NOT APPROVED (7) .Z:c7 • <<:. C__. t`� -- DATE //7/ - : o SIGNATURE OF--DIR'ECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE ��� w REV. 6/88 • • ' RENT._. :OMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT .D'E'I "TMENT i.;.. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ,,,,.` REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: "FbIk _ DATE CIRCULATED: 4/4/90 COMMENTS DUE:_4/18/90 ` '; t�. ECF 034-90 APPLICATION NO (S) : R-034-90 PROPONENT: George J. Xenos PROJECT TITLE: Rodgers Rezone BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks reclassification of a 1 . 75 acre parcel from R-1 , Single-Family Use to R-3 , Multi-Family Use , consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The property is currently deeloped with a single-family home and accessory buildings , which will be demolished if reclassification is achieved, and the property will then be developed with a multi-family complex. a conceltual site plan has been provided for information only. LOCATION: 1132 Edmonds Avenue SITE AREA 1. 75 acre BUILDING AREA (gross) : N/A IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR : MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° ° 0 ° ° 2 . Air ° ° ° 3 . Water ° 4 . Plants ° 5 . Animals ° , 6 . Energy & Natural Resources ° ° 7 . Environmental Health ° p ° ° 8 . Land' & Shoreline Use ° o ° ° 9 . Housing ° • ° ° ° 10 . Aesthetics ° o ° ° 11 . Light & Glare ° ° o ° ° .12 . Recreation ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° ° _ 14 . Transportation ° ° 15 . Public Services � ° 16 . Utilities ° COMMENTS : - NO ij 1 nt L CA V.11.A"e--) '('7) \I/e_ 1.'1 kil,., .. .. - ,\--k pc;'-':.:(..6k . L', 1,J-- v I (j II , i, --N-, - We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal ./ ! l Signature of Direbtor' or Authorized Representative Date RENTO "-:OMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DE] ' TMENT • DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF- 034-90 APPLICATION NO (S) . : R-034-90 PROPONENT: George J. Xenos PROJECT TITLE: Rodgers Rezone BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks to reclassify a 1. 75 acre parcel from R-1, Single-Family Use; to R-3 , Medium Density Multi-Family Use, consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The property is currently developed with a single-family home and accessory buildings, which will be demolished if reclassification is achieved, and the property will be then be developed with a multi-family complex; a conceptual site plan has been provided for information only. LOCATION: 1132 Edmonds Avenue N.E . TO: : • • PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 5/4/90 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION • • FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION • PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS : - COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO ,THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P.M. ON APRIL 18 , 1990 . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: v;/ APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED • e:;( it.icp kr--) • f� L.I-I �^ �•��.. I4_1 • "\ • DATE (.1'LII\ (.1 (/(--' I `I SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR/ AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE• . =t REV. 6/88 • RENTC( COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DE, ZTMENT f ' OP`-'�::^n ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ;.. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: j DATE CIRCULATED: 4 4 90 COMMENTS''DUE: 4/18/90 ECF 034-90 APPLICATION NO (S) : R-034-90 PROPONENT: George J. Xenos PROJECT TITLE : Rodgers Rezone BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks reclassification of a 1 . 75 acre parcel from R-1 , Single-Family Use to R-3 , Multi-Family Use, consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The property is currently deeloped with a single-family home and accessory buildings , which will be demolished if reclassification is achieved, and the property will then be developed with a multi-family complex. a conce[tual site plan has been provided for information only. LOCATION: 1132 Edmonds Avenue SITE AREA 1 . 75 acre BUILDING AREA (gross) : N/A IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1 . Earth ° 0 2.. Air 3 . Water ° ° 4 . Plants 0 ° 5 . Animals ° ° 6 . Energy & Natural Resources 0 ° ° 7 . Environmental Health ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° 9 . Housing O O O 10 . Aesthetics ° O ° O • 11 . Light & Glare ° 12 . Recreation 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° 14 . Transportation o ° 15 . Public Services O O 16 . Utilities 0 00MMENTS : t9 5aae.a • 14Q14 ( LA-1 o o-; D o as. !,Fry - ( OJ Pa' 4'oft" f31/402- oft aT-s (;i 75 Poo R.L 1 Ctvclrc�� We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this propos 1 . if ' 4//6/747 Signa re o Director or Authorized Representative Date RENTOi, ,OMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEP _'CMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF- 034-90 APPLICATION NO (S) . : R-034-90 PROPONENT: George J. Xenos PROJECT TITLE: Rodgers Rezone BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks to reclassify a 1. 75 acre parcel from R-1, Single-Family Use, to R-3 , Medium Density Multi-Family Use, consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The property is currently developed with a single-family home and accessory buildings, which will be demolished if reclassification is achieved, and the property will be then be developed with a multi-family complex; a. conceptual site plan has been provided for information only. LOCATION: 1132 Edmonds Avenue N.E. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 5/4/90 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P.M. ON APRIL 18 , 1990 . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Lo,J(, APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED 'Ilt� Ciw\AP LAN-5 1;)e%ic. Fz2 l .r swe" (5 N(..Mivn� Acwsvrj I`kuL-n•r (.y 16`1A-40.J h- Rh ea or 1s--3o e,L_. L. ,ter-, /.4-uzz-. ) oA &> ZY A rl•(lVYt C-D ra S. 6�T l.-'/ F+1 Z' Cony . M'`a- ,r Co u'a'CL 02 y bee)-.S AtmP1Z r ARS Co w z-3 , Z 0 3-1 i s,, r.ewe-DI f u N„--1 5 l'clZr 141:'t,a)€61-, Cw us Cr C rSi Pryounrs Dot.D �s P`C*% i (A-1 - t 7.N.CY.1OLD, t A� s 3 S Li A- 5 o a LA,N cat, `j PAAL, (, Z.oT5 / t•-) Rcc ere"-oowa-L OPS9R.1-0 r,,.rs A- G A,"a>,•rr o� s �A) 71�— ate— DATE CV00 SIGNATURE OF DIRECT R 0 AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 REN',,_';' ' 20MMUNITY DEVELOPMENT D . TMEN'AENTON FIRE DEPT. FIRE PREWN11ON BUREAU ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET APR 0 4 ISM REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: -1_,„ 1:?„„„..„4,„ DATE CIRCULATED: _4/4/90 COMMENTS DUE: 4/18/90 "" ' ��� � ECF 034-90 APPLICATION NO (S) : R-034-90 PROPONENT: George J. Xenos PROJECT TITLE: Rodgers Rezone BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks reclassification of a 1 . 75 acre parcel from R-1, Single-Family Use to R-3 , Multi-Family Use, consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The property is currently deeloped with a single-family home and accessory buildings , which will be demolished if reclassification is achieved, and the property will then be developed with a multi-family complex. a conceltual site plan has been provided for information only. LOCATION: 1132 Edmonds Avenue SITE AREA 1 . 75 acre BUILDING AREA (gross) : N/A IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR ' MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ' ° 2 . Air ° 3 . Water ° 4 . Plants ° 5 . Animals ° 6 . Energy & Natural Resources ° ° ° 7 . Environmental Health ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° 9 . Housing ° 10 . Aesthetics 0 11 . Light & Glare ° 12 . Recreation ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° ° 14 . Transportation ° 15 . Public Services ° 16 . Utilities ° COMMENTS : We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal y/999 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative D to - RENTO}._ 'OMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEF. iMENT DEVELUrMENT APPLICATION REVIEW/SHEET ECF- 034-90 APPLICATION NO (S) . : R-034-90 PROPONENT: George J. Xenos PROJECT TITLE: Rodgers Rezone BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks t o reclassify a 1. 75 acre parcel from R-1, Single-Family Use, to R-3 , Medium Density Multi-Family Use, consistent with the Comprehensive Plan . The property is currently developed with a single-family home and accessory buildings, which will be demolished if reclassification is achieved, and the property will be then be developed with a multi-family complex; a conceptual site plan has been provided for information only. LOCATION: 1132 Edmonds Avenue N.E . TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 5/4/90 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION • PLANNING DIVISION • • SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION' SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P.M. ON APRIL 18 ; 1990 . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED gile/ c /1-(--40 &}--i-e-v--71,Azee- i-.0.e:, „ez,“1-Z je- ,..t C.6.64.2mtY //_,44-c47- DATE4d.2.4., 14,71//991. SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE ... REV. 6/88 r � COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING APPLICANT: S. Michael Rodgers/George Xenos FILE NUMBER: R-034-90 LOCATION: 1132 Edmonds Avenue N.E. A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: Applicant seeks a non-project reclassification of a 1.75 acre parcel from R-1, Single-Family Use, to R-3, Medium Density, Multi-Family Use. (A conceptual site plan illustrating an option for future multi-family development is submitted for information only.) B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record: Elsie M. Seel 2. Applicant: S. Michael Rodgers/George Xenos 3. Existing Zoning: R-1, Single-Family Use 4. Existing Zoning in the Area: R-2, Low density multi-family; R-3, medium density, multi- family; P-1, Public Use; B-1, Commercial Use. 5. Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Medium Density, multi-family use 6. Size of Property: 1.75 acres 7. Access: Edmonds Avenue N.E. 8. Land Use: Two single-family dwellings and accessory units. 9. Neighborhood Characteristics: North: Multi-family use; church. East: Single-family, multi-family South: Highlands Convalescent Center West: Vacant C. HISTORICAL/BACKGROUND: Action File Ordinance Date Initial annexation --- 1795 10-7-59 D. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1. Utilities a. Water: A sixteen inch water main runs along Edmonds Ave. N.E. b. Sewer: An eight inch sanitary sewer line runs along Edmonds Ave. N.E. c. Storm Water Drainage: Storm water drains into a catch basin on Edmonds Ave. N.E. and into an eighteen inch concrete pipe storm system. 2. Fire Protection: Provided by the City of Renton as per ordinance requirements. 3. Transit: This site is not served by Metro transit. The closest routes are Routes #107 and #108 which run along N.E. Park Drive. • PRELIMINARY REPORT TO'Y-n'E HEARING EXAMINER Rodgers Rezone PUBLIC HEARING July 17, 1990 Page 2 4. Schools: a. Elementary Schools: Highlands Elementary School is approximately one-half mile north of the site. b. Middle Schools: McKnight Junior High School is one block north of the site. c. High Schools: Hazen High School is approximately 2.5 miles east of the site. 5. Recreation: North Highlands Park is approximately one-half mile north of the site E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1. Section 4-31-5, R-1, Residential Zone. 2. Section 4-31-8A, R-3, Residential District. 3. Section 4-8-14 (C), Change of Zone Classification (Rezone). F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT: 1. Northeast Renton Plan, City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium, 1986 (pgs. 55- 60). 2. Residential Goal, City of Renton.Comprehensive Plan Compendium, 1986 (pgs. 14-16). G. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1. The applicant is requesting a non-project reclassification of a 1.75 acre parcel from R-1, Single-Family Use, to R-3, Medium Density, Multi-Family Use. The property is currently developed with two single-family homes and accessory buildings. Development of the site with a multi-family complex is planned to take place at a future (not yet certain) date. The proposed reclassification is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designation for the property and is consistent with zoning designations/uses on surrounding properties. For example, the property is bounded on the north by multi-family residential development, on the east by both single-family and multi-family residential uses, and on the south by a residential convalescent center. The property to the west, across Edmonds Avenue, is zoned for commercial use, but is presently vacant, with dense vegetation (trees and ground cover). 2. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43.21(C), 1971, as amended), the Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of Non- Significance-Mitigated on May 28, 1990,with the following conditions: a. That the applicant, in conjunction with environmental/site plan review for any specific development project, will be required to provide a supplementary soils study to be approved by the Public Works Department and Building Division to ensure compatibility of the proposed project design with the underlying terrain. b. That the applicant, in conjunction with environmental/site plan review for any specific development project, will be required to provide a tree retention plan and a landscaping plan to be approved by the Landscape Planner. No tree cutting will be permitted until site plan approval is achieved and a vegetation permit is obtained. c. That the applicant, in conjunction with environmental/site plan review for any specific project, provide a traffic analysis for the intersection of Edmonds Avenue/Northeast Sunset Boulevard, to be approved by the Public Works Department and the Police Department, to ensure that traffic impacts are sufficiently identified and adequate mitigation measures established to provide appropriate levels of service at this intersection, with residential development on this site. • =T PRELIMINARY REPORT TC , HEARING EXAMINER Rodgers Rezone PUBLIC HEARING July 17, 1990 .Page 3 NOTE: The conceptual site plan submitted for potential future residential development on this lot has been reviewed and 'commented upon by staff. Staff will likely recommend that a specific site plan include reduced density, less steep access roads for commuting and emergency (particularly fire) vehicles and pedestrians, landscaping which would serve as a visual amenity and provide a buffer against light and glare, and off-site and on-site recreational amenities. At the time of development review (environmental and site plan),the applicant will'be required to provide mitigation measures to address impacts to public services (e.g., emergency services, schools) and utilities. Additional mitigation measures may also be required to address impacts identified at the time of review of a specific site plan. 3. Staff members from various departments have reviewed and approved the proposed classification in principle. Their comments have been attached and the content integrated into the report. 4. Section 4-8-14 (C) of the Zoning Ordinance lists three criteria that the Hearing Examiner is asked to consider, along with all other relevant information, in making a decision on a rezone application. a. That substantial evidence is presented demonstrating the subject reclassification appears not to have been specifically considered at the time of the last area land use analysis and area zoning. The subject property was annexed into the City of Renton in 1959. The structures presently located on the property were built prior to annexation; 'these structures do not conform with present development standards for single-family residences. b. That the property is potentially classified for the zone being requested pursuant to the policies set forth in the Comprehensive Plan and conditions have been met which would indicate the change is appropriate. The subject property is designated for Medium Density Residential Use on the Comprehensive Plan Map which was adopted in 1982. No changes were made to specific parcels in the area at the time the Map was adopted. The Comprehensive Plan Goals, Policies and Objectives for the City at large, and for Northeast Renton in particular (See 1986 Comprehensive Plan Compendium), also support multi-family development on this site and surrounding properties. In consideration of the Comprehensive Plan designation for this property (both with respect to the General Plan and the Northeast Renton Area Plan), an analysis was conducted, via Environmental Impact Statements, of effects likely to occur in conjunction with reclassification to and development with medium density multi- family residential use in this section of the community. Expected environmental impacts identified at that time for the properties in this section of Northeast Renton -- e.g., traffic at intersections with N.E. 12th Street and with Sunset Boulevard, aesthetics, public services, public utilities-- were reported to be mitigable through environmental protection measures and land use development conditions (to be applied at the time of site plan review). Long-range Planning Division staff have indicated that the Comprehensive Plan designation and policies currently in place for area properties, will continue to be valid for the foreseeable future. City staff from various departments have reviewed the present, non-project, programmatic rezone and have indicated that this action is supportable under the existing Comprehensive Plan Goals, Policies and Objectives. Impacts expected to occur at the time of future development are anticipated to be mitigable with measures recommended in conjunction with Environmental Review Committee evaluation for this reclassification and measures recommended in conjunction with site plan review for a specific future development application. For example, studies.(e.g., traffic study, supplementary soils study) should serve as a basis for selection of mitigation measures, (e.g., right-of-way improvements, retention of natural vegetation) which are necessary to improve the property and adjacent off- site area so that there is no undue burden on City services, and so that a proposed development is attractive, safe and functional. • _. PRELIMINARY REPORT TO i`rit HEARING EXAMINER Rodgers Rezone PUBLIC HEARING July 17, 1990 Page 4 c. That since the most recent previous zoning/land use analysis of the area in which the subject property is located, authorized public improvements, permitted private development or other circumstances affecting the subject property have undergone significant and material change. The subject property has been extremely stable with respect to zoning, development and use since its original incorporation into the City of Renton in 1959. The current single-family residential designation was established at the time of annexation. No changes to land use action have been made to the property since annexation;the existing residential units are now in a state of disrepair. The area in which the subject property is located, however, has experienced increased development in recent years. Indeed, the Northeast Section of Renton, in which the site is located, has experienced a greater degree of residential growth than any other section of the City. Multi-family residential uses (many of them less than five years old) occur throughout the area. Staff anticipate that this trend toward an increasing level of multi-family development will continue because the area is attractive and is accessible to local services and employment centers. Public services and infrastructure are available to serve the site, with development at an allowable level of density, with multi-family residential use in accord with R-3 developments standards (4-31-8A) and the Site Plan Review Ordinance (4-31-33). The City is, in fact, encouraging applicants to develop in those sections of Northeast Renton (such as that in which the subject property is located) which are not within the boundaries of the Heather Downs Moratorium District. d. The final test to determine whether a rezone is appropriate is to address the question of "timeliness." Is it appropriate to rezone the subject property at this time? The proposed rezone is considered to be timely for the following reasons: 1) The subject property is located in an area which is developed (or permitted to be developed) primarily with multi-family uses and in which there is a market for additional multi-family development. 2) The subject property is situated between parcels to the north and east designated for multi-family use, parcels to the west designated for commercial use and a parcel to the south, which is used for residential care. Under these present and likely future circumstances, staff believe that the subject parcel is not appropriate for the now permitted single- family use, but would be well-suited for multi-family residential development, which could function effectively as a transitional use between nearby low-density multi-family uses and abutting non-residential uses. 3) Based upon surrounding uses and residential development goals, the proposed action is characterized as an "infill" rezone -- as the subject property is essentially vacant, but located in an area in which developed properties predominate and in which there are adequate public services and facilities to support additional development (see G.4.d.4. for further discussion). 4) Public utilities, street improvements 'and public services are presently available to serve the site with allowable density levels (maximum of 25 units per developable acre or 43 units/80 new residents) [*] and to serve other developments presently located in/planned for the area. The City is implementing plans for additional improvements to accommodate likely future growth in this area. Fire Prevention Bureau staff and the Police Department staff both report that calls to the site for emergency services are anticipated to occur at the 'customary rate with future development which is designed to meet Zoning Ordinance standards (4-31-8A, 4-14, 4-31-33, 4-31-34), Building Regulations and Fire Code guidelines. • PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER Rodgers Rezone PUBLIC HEARING July 17, 1990 Page 5 Schools in the local area -- Highlands Elementary and Hillcrest Elementary, McKnight Middle School, and Hazen High School -- have sufficient resources to accommodate the anticipated 25 new students at allowable maximum development of this site. North Highlands Park is located within one-half mile of the site. Public utilities, including water mains, storm sewers, sanitary sewers and electric lines are adequate as currently provided, or can be readily improved to accommodate maximum allowable development on this site. Traffic engineering staff report that N.E. 12th Street and Sunset Boulevard, the nearest arterial roadways, are substantially travelled. Development of the property at maximum allowable density could be expected to generate up to +/- 263 ADWVTEs. At the time of development, a traffic study will be required --that study will be expected to provide information on impacts and suitable mitigation measures. Development densities/mitigation measures will be established to ensure that there is no substantial reduction in levels of service from development of this site [*] Staff may recommend that the applicants enter into agreements with the City, at the time of future site plan review, to participate in improvements to utilities, roadways and public services, as deemed necessary and appropriate by the City, in order to ensure adequate services to the site and the surrounding community. Also, at the time of development, the applicant will be required to implement other mitigation measures established in conjunction with site plan review,for protection of terrain and natural vegetation. 5) The proposed non-project reclassification would allow implementation of a future plan for multi-family residential uses on this site as permitted under the Comprehensive Plan. Any development plan for multi-family residential use on this property would be subject to approval by the City, under Sections 4-31-8A and 4-31-33 of the Zoning Ordinance. [*] At the time of site plan review, precise density limitations will be established for this parcel, based upon the Site Plan Review criteria defined in the Zoning Ordinance (4-31-33) and upon other applicable plans, policies and ordinances. H. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION: Based upon the above analysis, staff proposed that the Hearing Examiner recommend to the City Council the approval of the reclassification of the subject property to R-3, medium density residential zone (File No. 034-90), subject to the following condition: 1) That the applicant comply with the Environmental Review Committee's Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated, issued on May 28, 1990. NOTE: The City's Zoning Ordinance and Environmental Review Ordinance, as well as SEPA, mandate environmental review and site plan review at the time of submittal of a specific development proposal for this site. Therefore, no recommendation is made at this time for requiring such development review. . . j-i L/l w) • • l 1 • Ow.1 .' .:. ci; '-- 1 i I . \ L w < I 1 1 .=� T.. w z 1 1 -(,-„, \ • 0 <s 0 N °" CC - \ \ . /. ♦ k-(`" 11411 ♦ I I . 7, • \ cc .I I •I .1 • Rodgers Rezone • ECF:R-034-90 - • APPLICANT S. Michael Rodgers TOTAL AREA 1 .75 Acres • PRINCIPAL ACCESS Edmonds: Ave' NE EXISTING ZONING R-1 EXISTING USE Residential PROPOSED USE Multiple Family Development COMPREHENSIVE LAND OS(- PLAN - COMMENTS Located @ 1132 Edmonds Avenue N.E. . f . . .. J . I4J/k //Ji - DAYTON AVE NE • i • =-- ' . - / I i'f' I , DAYTON CT NE I R-1 : r-----, r 7—1.71.1..73 717-- _ .!r_.._ — �AVE 'NE—. — — '� - • / J x_*- .�4. :`~ ,.:•..� • 4. x: �,r r APT •�Y`�� • • r� :�;`:,;,,; APT I : .;.; 47 Y ,- ,.• i • PT 1 {• , ,...-.,.t,...r - • . .... \ p_1 • y'� s� GLEN WOOD A VE NE . �-) ,� . ®_2 (�j . . SCALE: 1'=200.' iiiii . I i -3 R-1 Balma & Holmberg Inc. - ,, L �, `. S2iG1NEERS k `SURVEYORS I 1 I I •• I I : r— ' X.T.'own BLVD., Hunt 7 • ARING 1 E • . . .. .. . . ...... ...... .............. .::::::::::::::..::::::::::.:::....:..::::.::::::::::::::.::.::.::::::... ::::.::.::::::::::.:.:::::..::::::::::::::::.::::::::::.::.. G • COIVIIVI :: >` :::::<�. ��pp.!c,�tian(s}.tist�d are.m•order• f• pplica#ipn FI;:;'fr.::: x'`mirer> :> PROJECT NAME: RENTON CROWN APARTMENTS PROJECT NUMBERS: ECF;R;SA-122-88 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Applications to rezone 7.57 acres of property from Business District (B-1) to Residential-Multiple Family and for site plan approval to allow the construction of an apartment complex with 111 dwelling units. • PROJECT NAME: RODGERS REZONE PROJECT NUMBERS: ECF;R 034 90 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Applicant seeks a non-project reclassification of a 1.75 acre parcel from R-1, Single-Family Use, to R-3, Multi-Family Use. The property is currently developed with two single- family homes and accessory buildings. Development of the site with a multi family complex is planned to take place at a future date; site plan approval is not sought at this time, however, a conceptual site plan is submitted for information only. UFlNT.P N SOf� ORANq ...:.:OM.�.;:.;: ::.>;;.:..Do.n Erikson, Chief,..�urrent Planning <.;:.;....:..:�:.::.;::.: :.>::.;::.: <.;;;:.::�>:�;:•.:.;:.;:.::;:.;:;:; :;»:..>:.;..;; ....:;>:•>:..:;:�>;;:.:;.. .:: JU1 9 { I E :::::::::::.:..:::::::. ::::::::::::::.�::::::::::.... >>AU.GUS7:7•<.1.990::�::ENTkTIVE;>::::::::>::>::::»::::::::>::>::::::>:<:::>:<:::>::»::>::>:::<:::>::> Alaska Distributors Rivertech Corporate Center, Phase II SA-128-89 ECF;SA;SA-129-89 Glacier Park Short Plat SHPL-125-89 ...... ............................. . • ................... ......................................................................... ......... .. ..................................................... ........................................ ..... ...... ........................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................... .............................................. ............. .... ........................................ ........................................................................................................... .............................................................. .................................. ......... No Agenda items at this time JU ..10;.1.990.{TENTA7IVE�;:; :;: ;:>:::::::::::::.�:. ::::::::::..::::::::: Union Plaza E CF SHPL• •V R SA 21 B 0 89 , ........................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................... Valley Medical Center Temp Parking Lot No Agenda items at this time SA-044-90 ..................................... ................ .... . ... . .. .. ..... . ........ .......... ... ............................................................. ... ......................................... ............................ .......................... .... ....... ...................................... UGUS 8, 990 EN• TATIVE�' �_ -._ r TT.�t,..,.,. ................................................................ .... , No Agenda items at this time Renton Crown Apartments ECF;R;SA-122-88 ............ ....................................................... ........... ........ ............... .................................................................................. ........................ .................................................................................... ...................... ........................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................... . Rodgers Rezone SEP.TEMBER 4 ::i:990 {:TENTH TIVE): ............... ........................................................................................... R-034-90 ..... .. No Agenda items at this time >:SEP.T EMBER:.1:1%.:::19904TENTATIVE .;.................................................................... ..................................... No Agenda items at this time • First City Development Black River Corp. Park, Phases VII &VIII ECF;SA;SM-071-88 &ECF;SA-109-88 No Agenda items at this time If you have any questions, or see a need for revisions, please contact me or Lenora immediately. DKE:kac • • • • • C.1 Z r{M3�; P .. '00,9 "'co SEPt E'00 .i I'. is City of. Renton . Land Use Hearin Exami . 9 ner will hold a • PUBU ,.po 1 ..: . . . , . .. .. in 'CITY, COUSNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL • ON JULY:1`7, 1990'-;•., BEGINNING AT 9:00 . • A.M. P.M. CONCERNING: " RODGERS REZONE ECF;R 034-90 . APPLICANT SEEKS A 'NON-PROJECT RECLASSIFICATION OF A • 1.75 ACRE PARCEL.FROM R-1, SINGLE-FAMILY USE, TO R-3, . MULTI-FAMILY<USE,• THE PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY DEVELOPED WITH TWO'SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES AND ACCESSORY:BUILDINGS. DEVELOPMENT'OFJHE SITE, WITH A MULTI-FAMILY COMPLEX IS • PLANNED TO ''TAKE PLACE AT A FUTURE DATE; SITE PLAN • APPROVAL IS=`0N0;T SOUGHT AT THIS TIME,• HOWEVER, A CONCEPTUAL.• SITE;' PLAN IS SUBMITTED FOR' INFORMATION • • ONLY. •�y' ,. ill u,uf _-r ' abg I • -7,1-:- 1 it ik, 1 k t____J i ,. .„ -= \�\ _ • 1; 1.:(•'`'i?, \\--',..ii • ,,;, 4 • U <'• ice ' .: ,r„,,, L____ .-, i ., .. , . , , m . . . • ,• .,,,,4_, :, t_. -.-... . \. ,;:x ,-•. ----- . ' . ., , , • .,. .„,,,,., ,,.;. ; • . , ........- , ,, ! • . . ,.... „ . ; ":„,„ , , . , , _. ..: ... . . • , ,.,,,„:„, , , -,,, ....- .• .., . . • [—' --] .. . .. �.,,,,,.. 7 . , . • ' . GENERAL (.L c :{;i .1r /a IV �\ ;3 O C A►T.I®N ►v ;,5•' ,..1-,1-I.i. I • 1 r�` SS. , 11• • ;32 ED•MONDS AVENUE NOR • THEAST • • • FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF :RENTON PLANNING DIVISION 235-2550 • • THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION ' :. 71,.Y•!...: •;' ' w'i:.. �,jl..(.:. .I''. 'I 't'r, 1 ..i.. .'y' `Ir `'' ;:4'titt r"••• �`h • _;F?'. ' 'Try 1:. r..' 'i;rtiq.., • • CERTIFICATION i I , -4_ , , .HEREBY CERTIFY TH AT 0 •: COPIES OF • • THE ABOVE DOCUM ''�T WERE POSTED BY ME IN' CONSPICUOUS „. Ps• _......LACES O'N;,OR NEARBY THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY ON /13-2 ,„-,,�,- ,� 1 i�� • : , . _,.... •,.., , , , •, . •:-.- -.. , , __ : ,..__ `-_ 4 1TTEST: Subscribed 'and sworn before me, a tto„ i___ . - N,tairy Public •n and ' rr, the-7;tate of Washington • /.. • 1_i� on the —L SIGNED '6/� ,� ! / . . '' 'day o� "Arid 9Q • Q� • f r. "' f _ J O O .............. . ...................... .......... .:.::::::.:::C>UNCIL CHAMBER `' E. ..he applicat on(s) listed are to order of application number only and not necessarily the order in which tale.<will:::...:...:..::.:.:::.:: .:..::.,.:...:.;i ,..:. :...:.. ,.: :.:.::.:::.;:..:.:::: ;...::;:;:.::•;>.;: :.;;:;.:g :;;:.:....,.i:;..:: ::::::<::<:::;::>::>;:;:; ;;:: : : : : :y ::: be heard Items will be called for hearing at the d�sc..retion of the Hearing Examiner,:::::;:: • PROJECT NAME: RENTON CROWN APARTMENTS PROJECT NUMBERS: ECF;R;SA-122-88 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Applications to rezone 7.57 acres of property from Business District (B-1) to Residential-Multiple Family and for site plan approval to allow the construction of an apartment complex with 111 dwelling units. • PROJECT NAME: • RODGERS REZONE PROJECT NUMBERS: ECF;R-034-90 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Applicant seeks a non-project reclassification of a 1.75 acre parcel from R-1, Single-Family Use, to R-3, Multi-Family Use. The property is currently developed with two single- family homes and accessory buildings. Development of the site with a multi-family complex is planned to take place at a future date; site plan approval is not sought at this time, however, a conceptual site plan is submitted for information only. 23. $ L-034 -50 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION 510 6 7 Kathleen Hoover ,being first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the VALLEY DAILY NEWS • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON HEARING EXAMINER Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week. That said newspapers RENTON, WASHINGTON are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published the Council Chambers on the second floor in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King of City Hall, Renton, Washington, on July County, Washington. The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal 17, 1990 at 9:00 a.m.to consider the follow- ingnewspaper order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for petitions:GE by Pe g RODGERS REZONE King County. ECF;R-034-90 Applicant seeks a non-project reclassifica- tion of a 1.75 acre parcel from R-1, Single- The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Kent Edition Family Use, to R-3, Multi-Family Use. The XX , Renton Edition XX , Auburn Edition XX , (and not in property is currently developed with two sin- gle-family form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers gle-family homes and accessory buildings. supplement g y Public Notice Development of the site with a multi-family during the below stated period. The annexed notice a complex is planned to take place at a future date;site plan approval is not sought at this (Notice o f Public Hearing) 4283 time, however, a conceptual site plan is submitted for information only. Project is located at 1132 Edmonds Avenue North- was published on July 5 , 199 0 east. All interested persons to said petitions are invited to be present at the Public Hearing on July 17, 1990 at 9:00 a.m. to express The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the their opinions. 2 3 . 2 8 Published in the Valley Daily News July Sum Of$ 5, 1990. 4283 Acct. #51067 Xat'Lleeit) 44-79-0-eA, Subscribed and sworn before me this 12 t h day of July 19 9 0 ry Public for the State of Washington residing at Auburn, King County, Washington VDN#87 Revised 4/89 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, Renton, Washington, on July 17, 1990 at 9:00 a.m. to consider the following petitions: RODGERS REZONE EC F;R-034-90 Applicant seeks a non-project reclassification of a 1.75 acre parcel from R-1, Single-Family Use, to R-3, Multi-Family Use. The property is currently developed with two single-family homes and accessory buildings. Development of the site with a multi-family complex is planned to take place at a future date; site plan approval is not sought at this time, however, a conceptual site plan is submitted for information only. Project is located at 1132 Edmonds Avenue Northeast. All interested persons to said petitions are invited to be present at the Public Hearing on July 17, 1990 at 9:00 a.m. to express their opinions. Publication Date: July 5, 1990 Account No. 51067 it %, CITY OF RENTON Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann,Director July 6, 1990 • ;Y George J.Xenos 1616-156thAve NE, #115 Bellevue,WA 98008 SUBJECT: Rodgers Rezone ECF;R-034-90 • Dear Mr.Xenos: The date of Tuesday, July 17, 1990 at 9:00 a.m., has been set for rezone review of the above-referenced matter. The hearing will be held In the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, Renton, Washington. The applicant or representative(s) Of the applicant is required to be present at the.public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you before the hearing. If you have any questions, please call 235-2550. Sincerely, , c yx 7 Donald K. Erickson,AICP Chief, Current Planning S DKE:kac cc: S. Michael Rodgers 11111 NE 3rd St Bellevue,WA 98004 Elsie M. Seel . 2213NE8thSt ' Renton,WA 98056 s,Vr`^t • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2631 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION 5106 7 4261-413 Kathleen Hoover ,being first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the VALLEY DAILY NEWS NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition Environmental Review Committee Renton, Washington Dailynewspapers six (6) times a week. That said newspapers RG)heas Environmentalseda Reviewm Committee published (ERC) has issued Determination of Non- are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six Significance-Mitigated for the following pro- months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published ject under the authority of the Rentor in the English language continuallyas dailynewspapers in Kent, KingMunicipal Code. The following Applicant g has completed a mitigation process: County, Washington. The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal RODGERS REZONE newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for ECF:R-034-90 Applicant seeks to reclassify a 1.75 acre King County. parcel from R-1, Single-Family Use, to R-3 Medium Density Multi-Family Use consis- tentThe notice in the exact form attached, waspublished in the Kent Edition property with thec Comprehensive developed ed wPith The is currently developed with a sin- . , Renton Edition X.K , Auburn Edition , (and not in gle-family home and accessory buildings, supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers which will be demolished if reclassification duringthe below stated period. The annexed notice a Public Notice is achieved, and the property will then be developed with a multi-family complex; a conceptual site plan has been provided for (Environmental Determination) R4232 information osly. Further information regarding this action is available in the Community Development was published on June 20 , 1990 Department, Current Planning Division, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. This Determination is FINAL. There is a 14 day appeal period which will The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the end at 5:00 PM on July 3, 1990. Any Sum of$ 29 • 93 appeal of this decision may be made to the City's Hearing Examiner, Municipal Build- ing, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton,Wash- ington. An appeal must state clearly, in 71cath-14,() /le l7 �� writing, why the Determination should be revised and must be accompanied by a non-refundable $75.00 filing fee. Published in the Valley Daily News June 20, 1990 R4232. Subscribed and sworn before me this 26 t h day of June 19 9 0 N�Public for the State of Washington rY g residing at Auburn, King County, Washington VDN#87 Revised 4/89 •% t CIT-WJF RENTON Community Development Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Kenneth E.Nyberg,Director June 18, 1990 George J. Xenos 1616- 156th Ave NE, #115 Bellevue, WA 98008 RE: Rodgers Rezone ECF;R-034-90 Dear Mr.Xenos: This letter is to inform you that the comment period has ended for the Determination of Non-Significance- Mitigated for the above-referenced project. No substantive comments were received. The Committee's determination is final and may be appealed to the City's Hearing Examiner no later than 5:00 p.m. on July 3, 1990. Any appeal must state clearly why the determination should be revised and must be accompanied by a non-refundable$75.00 filing fee. If you have questions or desire clarification of the above, please call Lenora Blauman at 235-2550. For the Environmental Review Committee, Qd)t. Donald K. Erickson, AICP Chief, Current Planning DKE:kac cc: S. Michael Rodgers 11111 NE 3rd St Bellevue, WA 98004 Elsie M. Seel 2213 NE 8th ST Renton, WA 98056 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 • NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION Environmental Review Committee Renton, Washington The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. The following Applicant has completed a mitigation process: RODGERS REZONE • ECF;R-034-90 Applicant seeks to reclassify a 1.75 acre parcel from R-1, Single-Family Use, to R-3, Medium Density Multi-Family Use, consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The property is currently developed with a single-family home and accessory buildings, which will be demolished if reclassification is achieved, and the property will then be developed with a multi-family complex; a conceptual site plan has been provided for information only. Further information regarding this action is available in the Community Development Department, Current Planning Division, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. This Determination is FINAL. There is a 14 day appeal period which will end at 5:00 PM on July 3, 1990. Any appeal of this decision may be made to the City's Hearing Examiner, Municipal Building, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, Washington. An appeal must state clearly, In writing, why the Determination should be revised and must be accompanied by a non-refundable$75.00 filing fee. Publication Date: June 20, 1990 • Account No. 51067 • • • • • • ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION APPLICATION NO: ECF;R 034-90 PROPOSED ACTION RODGERS REZONE GEORGE XENOS APPLICANT SEEKS TO RECLASSIFY A 1.75 ACRE PARCEL FROM R-1, SINGLE-FAMILY USE, TO R-3, MEDIUM DENSITY MULTI-FAMILY USE, CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THE PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY DEVELOPED WITH A SINGLE-FAMILY HOME AND ACCESSORY BUILDINGS, WHICH WILL BE DEMOLISHED IF RECLASSIFICATION IS ACHIEVED, AND THE PROPERTY WILL THEN BE DEVELOPED WITH A MULTI-FAMILY COMPLEX; A CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN HAS BEEN PROVIDED FOR INFORMATION ONLY. GENERAL LOCATION AND OR ADDRESS 1132 EDMONDS AVENUE NORTHEAST POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE I E.R.C.] HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION ❑DOES MDOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT DWILL ZWILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 pm., JULY 3, 1990 • FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE _ -. _ WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION CERTIFICATION - I , ,/ �, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT 3 COPIES OF • • THE ABOVE DOCUMEN WERE POSTED BY ME IN 3 CONSPICUOUS PLACES,0,,O,N1, OR NEARBY THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY ON l/_,Z __.a4, _ TC1` ST Subscribed and worn to before me, a Nr>.E,ry f.bl i c, • and f"•/ the . e of Wash i n ton • _ "rest'.i n=, in 16,,,tL4 , on the/a SIGNED : : r ri 9l7, NOTICE ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION APPLICATION NO; ECF;R 034-90 PROPOSED ACTION RODGERS REZONE GEORGE XENOS APPLICANT SEEKS TO RECLASSIFY A 1 .75 ACRE PARCEL FROM R-1 , SINGLE-FAMILY USE, TO R-3, MEDIUM DENSITY MULTI-FAMILY USE, CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THE PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY DEVELOPED WITH A SINGLE-FAMILY HOME AND ACCESSORY BUILDINGS, WHICH WILL BE DEMOLISHED IF RECLASSIFICATION IS ACHIEVED, AND THE PROPERTY WILL THEN BE DEVELOPED WITH A MULTI-FAMILY COMPLEX; A CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN HAS BEEN PROVIDED FOR INFORMATION ONLY. GENERAL LOCATION AND OR ADDRESS 1132 EDMONDS AVENUE NORTHEAST POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE I E.R.C. ) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DIODES IMIDOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT DWILL %WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., JULY 3, 1990 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION A/6 LEL GROct9ETA. June 11, 1990 3'003=df 0661, 9 Z Nnr Mr. Donald Erickson Planning Director N01N3a 30 A1.13 City of Renton NOISIAIQ 9NINNV1d Renton City Hall 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Re: 1132 Edmonds Street Property (See attached map) • " Owners: S. Michael and Marcia A. Rodgers Dear Mr. Erickson: Please accept this letter as my request to the person of authority within the City of Renton to correct the R-1 zoning classification on the above referenced property to the R-3 zoning which exists on adjacent properties. I was recently made aware of the opportunity for the planning director within a municipality to exercise the director' s discretionary waiver under State of Washington municipal law. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. V t yo rs, . icha Rodgers SMR/sb »m JIczd,StaEEt • BE1'f cn E, (Wa Ain9ton 98004 • (2o6) 455-mmmo . . .. I 1 :. 1 ,.., , L J _ _ 1 ! i il _3/1 . r DAYTON AVE NE • 7 ! /4` / .- .....am gm . R-1 - / /7., • / ...:(4,,- 1 DAYTON CT NE \,.../z.4: , • I i i f' . I Cs.3, 1 R-1 .......MI NMI IMP i. /g)' I I , IF Nal, m• -1, •". / r--------7-1."m11.11.11" R-3 ,,s" e . /. , 13-1 1 1 1 R—tt 1, •%,..... . . , , • . , i ,..e; / & , „I ED_MONDS _ mingfrowa. menimimommeimmiimen.jimmoin. IMO•.. --.- -- ——— ,MOVER IIM SIMINIMPOMMIMIMIIIIIII -- --- r-A V • —• — i 4.0 . •0:,,,V,4 M'A 'AI g_f,..., APT . 11-;;•'3A: --0,-.4,-,,,lir"g'ri,,„•--,0,,,It.i/ ' I / • ,1Pg' qe VP; e•-;. '. 1-' ' ,,,,p., i \ 4r,x, • ,,I ‘.,_•-..-V•4•4`"7.e";•ii''r-",e. 1 APT ' 1 . 11v - .5.?"' _,,'.7'- • ',g-- f. .-a,-'...:' . I• , • %.,..t,- -,,,,,4,..".,. .„,., ,,;?'.;,:., -r4, ir- ••ra;';97P":4P-^_,;;P" i \\ Ian MB n n A .1 1 N. "5>• \ P-1 • 1 -rY' • / Sry GLENWOOD AVE NE • 0 / 'Yok, '..t c- ../"--' i 1 : \......, / • // . SCALE: 1"=200' 4011111R'N'21is .........4,--/, At. .. r-ii r., 11/1111111111 I . 1.3 , \ \ . • , . •. . . . . .... , \\71111111.4r \ / 1 1 1 .1 ,• • 1 L...........1.........' OM MN OM Mill OM IMP UM MIMI MEI IMIll MS \.\ \ R-1 Balma & Holmberg Inc. i 1 HARRINGTON AVE NE r".""'"m"...."mammummil . --/ '`-------------4-11--- ENGINEERS & SURVEYORS . 1: - • 1 . - '. li'iN B - • 61/,I - I i - . - - . 1 .. . I •" I I i : [---- . 1 i .; 1 ----71------1- . - 3,334,..1506,i.x.x.monALANN 96027BLvD.e..surrz) .9;,_ 0250 DATE 11-16-89 JOG MO. 0000 WWashington State Duane Berentson AW Department of Transportation Secretary of Transportation District 1 15325 S.E.30th Place Bellevue,Washington 98007 June 1, 1990 PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON Don Erickson JUN - 6 1990 Zoning Administrator Planning Division RECEIVED Community Development Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 SR 900 MP 12 . 56 CS 171300 Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance for Rodgers Rezone File No. ECF; R 034-90 Dear Mr. Erickson: This letter is in response to the Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance (MDNS) that we received from the City of Renton on May 30, 1990. The proposed development, located at 1132 Edmonds Ave. NE, is for a non-project reclassification of a 1. 75 acre parcel from R-1, Single-Family Use to R-3 Multi-Family Use. The ultimate plan is for the construction of a 42 unit apartment complex with 84 parking spaces. The Department of Transportation has reviewed the MDNS and we concur with the mitigation measures the City is imposing upon the developer. When a traffic study is completed, we would appreciate the opportunity to review and comment on the study. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this proposal. Should you have any questions, please feel free to call Donald Hurter (562-4274) or Robert Eichelsdoerfer (562-4297) of my Developer Services section. Sincerely, (/ 1% 01( ES L. LUTZ, P.E. ilities/Developer ervices Engineer RTE:rte cc: State Aid WSDOT MS 121 CITY OF RENTONANtgaMEE • CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 24 day of M , 19 ' O , I deposited in the mails of the United States a sgaled envelope containing (Actervymvutiurvf, a- ce k 1t documents . This information was sent to: Name Representing CH ,. 1 tH Co. --et 1",.. .41 1n4-0 Te4to-t. wild I,R_ . "Po PeNeyle..%' IT Pc �iiihS,0O `ho-ik.., Corn Corpixt.. C (Signature of Sender) . ,. Subscribed and sworn to me t ' Cgge- day of l/ / 14-1 19 qQ . cy1411%) 4141 Notary P blic in a d f'. the Stat f Was gton r; •ing at the in.d rn] e'.t Name: ne, INC e Project Number: • `$ CITY OF RENTON usilL Community Development Department Earl Clymer, Mayor ; Kenneth E.Nyberg,Director • • May 25, 1990 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section Mail Stop PV-11 Olympia,WA 98504 Re: Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith are copies of Environmental Determinations and Environmental Checklists for those • projects reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee on May 23, 1990: • DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED RODGERS REZONE ECF;R 034-90 Applicant seeks to reclassify a 1.75 acre parcel from R-1, Single-Family Use, to R-3, Medium Density Multi-Family Use, consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The property is currently developed with a single-family homeland accessory buildings, which will be demolished if reclassification is achieved, and the property will then be developed with a multi-family complex; a conceptual site plan has been provided for information only. The project Is located at 1132 Edmonds Avenue Northeast. The fifteen (15) day comment period for this project will end on June 12, 1990. Following the end of the comment period, the City will finalize it's Determination unless comments received require a reevaluation. Following the finalization of the Determination,there Is a required fourteen (14) day appeal period. DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER,TEMP. PARKING LOT ECF;SA 044-90 The proposed parking is designed to provide temporary parking facilities for the hospital employees and construction personnel during construction of the new medical building, and South 43rd Street improvements for a staging area. The project is located at South 43rd Street and Davis Ave South. The fifteen (15) day comment period and the fourteen (14) day appeal period for this project will run concurrently and will end on June 12, 1990. Following the end of the comment/appeal period,the City will • finalize it's Determination unless comments received require a reevaluation. If you have questions, please call Lenora Blauman or me at 235-2550. • : En.it m ntal eview Committee, Donald K. Erickson,AICP Chief, Current Planning DKE:kac cc: Mr. Craig Larson, King County Planning Division Mr. Gregory M. Bush, Metro Department of Wildlife Mr.Joe Robels, Department of Fisheries Mr.James Lutz, Department of Transportation Ms. Connie Corpuz, City of Seattle 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton,,Washington 98055 ", CITY OF RENTON Community Development Department . Earl Clymer, Mayor Kenneth E.Nyberg,Director • May 24, 1990 . George J.Xenos 1616-156th Ave NE, #115 Bellevue,WA 98008 Re: Rodgers Rezone ECF;R 034-90 Dear Mr.Xenos: • This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee and is to inform you that they have completed their review of the environmental impacts of the above referenced project. The Committee, on May 23, 1990, decided that your project may be Issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with the following conditions: EARTH 1. That the applicant, in conjunction with environmental/site plan review for any specific development project, will be required to provide a supplementary soils study to be approved by the Public Works Department and Building Division to ensure compatibility of the proposed project design with the underlying terrain. NATURAL ENVIRONMENT S 2. That the applicant, in conjunction with environmental/site plan review for any specific development project, will be required provide a tree retention plan and a landscaping plan to be approved by the Landscape Planner. No tree cutting will be permitted until site plan approval is achieved and a vegetation permit is obtained. TRAFFIC 3. That the applicant, in conjunction with environmental/site plan review for any specific project, provide a traffic analysis for the intersection of Edmonds Avenue/Northeast Sunset Boulevard, to be approved by the Public Works Department and the.Police Department, to ensure that traffic impacts are sufficiently identified and adequate mitigation measures established to provide appropriate levels of service at this intersection, with residential development on this site. NOTE: The conceptual site plan submitted for potential future residential development on this lot has been reviewed and commented upon by staff. Staff recommends that a specific site plan include reduced density, less steep access roads for commuting and emergency (particularly fire) vehicles and pedestrians, landscaping which would serve as a visual amenity and provide a buffer against 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 • ,George J.Xenos Rodgers Rezone • May 24, 1990 Page 2 . • light and glare, and off-site and on-site recreational amenities. At the time of development review (environmental and site plan), the applicant will be required to provide mitigation measures to address impacts to public services (e.g., emergency services, schools) and utilities. Additional mitigation measures may also be required to address Impacts Identified at the time of review of a specific site plan. Because the Environmental Review Committee imposed specific mitigation measures rather than issue a Determination of Significance,there is a required fifteen (15)day comment period during which comments are solicited from various agencies, jurisdictions or individuals (including the applicant) who may have an interest in the Committee's decision. The comment period will end June 12, 1990. Following the end of the comment period, the City will finalize its Determination unless comments received require a reevaluation. Following the finalization of the Determination,there Is a required fourteen (14) day appeal period. Staff urges you to contact the various City representatives, as appropriate, (e.g. the Public Works Department) as soon as possible, to obtain more Information concerning specific mitigation elements recommended for this project, if you have specific questions. This information will assist you in planning for implementation of your project and will enable you to exercise your appeal rights more fully, if you choose to do so. In addition, by the end of the comment period, we should be able to establish a tentative public hearing date before the Hearing Examiner, should a public hearing be necessary. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at 235-2550. . • For the Environmental Review Committee, y Donald K. Erickson,AICP Chief, Current Planning DKE:kac cc: S. Michael Rodgers 11111 NE 3rd St Bellevue,WA 98004 Elsie M. Seel 2213NE8thST • Renton,WA 98056 . , , r___s . . , . . ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION ECF;R 034-90 APPLICATION NO. PROPOSED ACTI.ON RODGERS REZONE GEORGE XENOS APPLICANT SEEKS TO RECLASSIFY A 1.75 ACRE PARCEL FROM R-1, SINGLE- FAMILY USE, TO R-3, MEDIUM DENSITY MULTI-FAMILY USE, CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THE PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY DEVELOPED WITH A SINGLE-FAMILY HOME AND ACCESSORY BUILDINGS, WHICH WILL BE DEMOLISHED IF RECLASSIFICATION IS ACHIEVED, AND THE PROPERTY WILL BE THEN BE DEVELOPED WITH A MULTI-FAMILY COMPLEX; A CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN HAS BEEN PROVIDED FOR INFORMATION ONLY. GENERAL LOCATION AND OR ADDRESS 1132 EDMONDS AVENUE NORTHEAST POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE IE.R.C.3 HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION EDGES 411pOES NOT • HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT DWILL KWILL NOT BE REQUIRED. • THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS. PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY JUNE 12, 1990 AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION AT 235-2550. -- • DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE -----___ WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION --' _ CERTIFICATION - -- I , / /?, %�� ', 'HEREBY CERTIFY THAT 3 COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMEN WERE POSTED BY ME IN 3 CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON OR NEARBY THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY ON /2 , .1 �..ii ,. _;.' ; ..,••.;'=;�'AL"r"5ST: Subscribed and sworn to before.me a ,) •"' -,• '`'Not ry Public, 'n and r the State of Washington • ectlie it., • ,,r\----1 ,,{).esi li i on the AV- SIGNED : X 1.:1 • 1 NOTICE . ENvi.RoNmENTAL .DECLARATION ECF;R 034-90 APPLICATION NO. PROPOSED ACTION RODGERS REZONE GEORGE XENOS APPLICANT SEEKS TO RECLASSIFY A. 1.75 ACRE PARCEL FROM R-1, SINGLE- FAMILY USE, TO R-3, MEDIUM DENSITY MULTI-FAMILY USE, CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THE PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY DEVELOPED WITH A SINGLE-FAMILY HOME AND ACCESSORY BUILDINGS, WHICH WILL BE DEMOLISHED. IF RECLASSIFICATION IS ACHIEVED, AND THE PROPERTY WILL BE THEN BE DEVELOPED WITH A MULTI-FAMILY COMPLEX; A CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN HAS BEEN PROVIDED FOR INFORMATION ONLY. GENERAL LOCATION AND OR ADDRESS 1132 EDMONDS AVENUE NORTHEAST POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE [ E. R.C. ] HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION ❑DOES FOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT ❑WILL %WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY JUNE 12, 1990 • AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION . • • AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION 51067 *29,93 Kathleen Hoover ,being first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the - NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINA !ON VALLEY DAILY NEWS ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non- Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week. That said newspapers Significance-Mitigated for the following pro- are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six jects(s) under the authority of the Renton monthsprior to the date ofpublication referred to, printed and published Municipal Code. RODGERS REZONE in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King ECF;R 034-90 County, Washington. The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal Applicant seeks to reclassify a .75 acrenewspaper byorder of the Superiorg Court of the State of Washington for Use,to -3,parcel fediu R-Density Multi-Fam- King iy County. yUse R,consistent with he Comprehen- sive Plan. The property is currently developed with a single-family home The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Kent Edition and accessory buildings, which will be , Renton Edition XX , Auburn Edition , (and not in demolished if reclassification is supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers achieved, and the property will then be x; PP g Y developed with a multi-family complex; during the below stated period. The annexed notice a Public Notice a conceptual site plan has been provid- ed for information only. The project is (Environmental Determination) R4188 located at 1132 Edmonds Avenue Northeast. This decision will be finalized in fifteen was published on May 28 , 1990 (15)dais. Written comments received after Public Notice The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the 5:00 p.m.,June 12, 1990 will not be consid- sum of$ 2 9 . 9 3 ered.A fourteen(14)day appeal period will commence following the finalization of DNS-M. The mitigation measures Imposed / by the City of Renton's Environmental c/ ) Review Committee are available at the Cur- rent Planning Division of the Community Development Department, Municipal Build- ing Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. Subscribed and sworn before me this)i t h gay of J u n e 19 90 Published in the Valley Daily News May 28, 1990. R4156 Ac..ct. 51067 Nota Public for the State of Washington residing at Auburn, King County, Washington VDN#87 Revised 4/89 PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON JUL 1 6 1990 NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated for the following project(s) under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. RODGERS REZONE ECF;R 034-90 Applicant seeks to reclassify a 1.75 acre parcel from R-1, Single-Family Use, to R-3, Medium Density Multi-Family Use, consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The property is currently developed with a single-family home and accessory buildings, which will be demolished if reclassification is achieved, and the property will be then be developed with a multi-family complex; a conceptual site plan has been provided for information only. The project is located at 1132 Edmonds Avenue Northeast. This decision will be finalized in fifteen (15) days. Written comments received after 5:00 p.m., June 12, 1990 will not be considered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period will commence following the finalization of DNS-M. The mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Current Planning Division of the Community Development Department, Municipal Building Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. Publication Date: May 28, 1990 Account No. 51067 • CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE • (MITIGATED) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO.: ECF;R 034-90 APPLICATION NO(S): • •ECF;R 034-90 PROPONENT: :George Xenos ,` I , • PROJECT NAME: .. Rodgers Rezone DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Applicant seeks a non-project reclassification of•a 1.75 acre parcel from R-1, Single-Family Use, to R-3, Multi- ' Family Use. The property is currently developed with two .single-family homes and accessory buildings. Development of the site with a multi-family complex is planned to take place at a future date; site plan approval is not sought at this time, however, a conceptual site plan . !is submitted for information only. ' LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: ! 1132 Edmonds Avenue Northeast LEAD AGENCY: , City of Renton Community Development Department Current Planning Division • The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse Impact on the environment. An environmental Impact statement (EIS) is not required . . under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental . Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-2822(D) Renton Municipal Code (see attached sheet). These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts Identified during the environmental • review process. i ! k ' I This DNS-M is issued.under WAC 197-11-340(2). Because mitigation measures have been imposed, the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fifteen (15).days from May 28, 1990. Any interested party may submit written comments which must be submitted by 5:00 p.m.,June 12, 1990, in order to be considered. . A fourteen (14) day appeal period will commence following the finalization of the DNS. • Responsible Official: { , I Environmental Review Committee . . c/o Don Erickson, Chief, Current Planning Current Planning Division . ! I Community Development Department. • • 200 Mill Avenue South , Renton,WA 98055 • • PUBLICATION DATE: . May 28, 1990 • DATE OF DECISION: I May 23, 1990 SIGNATURES: • • Kenneth E. N ergs Dirtscfor Community _./eloprnen Bepart .• . ' I • • L , . • Lynn . utt nn, Director ` Publi orks Department j • • DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED MITIGATION MEASURES e 1 PROJECT: Rodgers Rezone PROPONENT: George Xenos ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF;R 034-90 I . APPLICATION NUMBER: ECF;R 034-90 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Applicant seeks a non-project reclassification of a 1.75 acre parcel from R-1, Single-Family Use,to R-3, Multi-Family Use. The property is currently developed with two single-family homes and _ j accessory buildings. Development of the site with a multi-family complex is planned to take place at a future date; site plan approval is not sought at this time, however, a conceptual site plan is submitted for information only. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 1132 Edmonds Avenue Northeast RECOMMENDATIONS: The Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with the following conditions: EARTH 1. That the applicant, in conjunction with environmental/site plan review for any specific development project, will be required to provide a supplementary soils study to be approved by the Public Works.Department and Building Division to ensure compatibility of the proposed project design with the underlying terrain. NATURAL ENVIRONMENT 2. That the applicant, in conjunction with environmental/site plan review for any specific development project, will be required provide a tree retention plan and a landscaping plan to be approved by the Landscape Planner. No tree cutting will be permitted until site plan approval is achieved and a vegetation permit is obtained. TRAFFIC 3. That the applicant, in conjunction with environmental/site plan review for any specific project, provide a traffic analysis for the intersection of Edmonds Avenue/Northeast Sunset Boulevard, to be approved by the Public Works Department and the Police Department, to ensure that traffic impacts are sufficiently identified and adequate mitigation measures established to provide appropriate levels of service at this intersection, with residential development on this site. . NOTE: The conceptual site plan submitted for potential future residential development on,this lot has been reviewed and commented upon by staff. Staff recommends that a specific site plan include reduced density, less steep access roads for commuting and emergency (particularly fire) vehicles and pedestrians, • landscaping which would serve as a visual amenity and provide a buffer against light and glare, and off-site and on-site recreational amenities. At the time of development review (environmental and site plan), the applicant will be required to provide mitigation measures to'address impacts to public services (e.g., emergency services, schools) and utilities. Additional mitigation measures may also be required to address Impacts Identified at the time of review of a specific site plan. • • . mmdoc . r REN`I"oiv COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET • .REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ��JOA IIC`V1 • DATE CIRCULATED: 4 4 90 COMMENTS DUE: 4/18/90 ECF 034-90 APPLICATION NO(S) : R-034-90 ' PROPONENT: Geor•e J. Xenos PROJECT TITLE: Rodgers Rezone BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks reclassification of a 1. 75 acre parcel from R-1, Single-Family Use to R-3 , Multi-Family Use, consistent - with the Comprehensive Plan. The property is currently deeloped with a single-family home and accessory buildings, which will be demolished if reclassification is achieved, and the property will then be developed with. a multi-family complex. a conce[tual site plan has been provided for information only.. , , LOCATION: 1132 Edmonds Avenue SITE AREA _1. 75 acre BUILDING AREA (gross) : N/A IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE • . MINOR MAJOR. INFORMATION ' IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY ' . 1. Earth //f° ° 2 . Air ° o ° ° 3 . Water ° o ° ° 4 . Plants ° o ° - ° 5. Animals ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° o ° 7 . Environmental Health ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use . ° ° o O • p 9 : ' Housing ° ° o ° ° 10. Aesthetics ° o ° ° 11. Light & Glare ° o ° ° 12 . Recreation ° ° ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° 14 . Transportation o ° 15 . Public Services ° ° ° 16 . Utilities( • � - ° ° COMMENTS: S. ra/ae.. /e dui a40 Si5 c UesJ i v. z-� ®nc/s .mac "v-G- �i�1/ A) & 4-i S e. Bkof. /e'L'�—. /7 2. -PLANNING DiMMsio / f ,!.., CITY OF RENTQP, 6.0 /1"/*-�,,,,Gt�1� g 2G�cYe, eseCe�C/.- o'hd tSi G<I'7• 'c etv/.7,6./� .s . fri.�.�C--s.-`l/f '7''gek., 2)-7 c31'j,/ x.,,7 /0 7..c.A -PI`'c 241066e, 4- ; Ag . g U VET We ,have reviewed this application 'with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional informationA_s needed to properly assess- this proposal. e i' ' �' KA, /P J/2 //7/7 2- Signature of Director o Authorized Representative lei Date J • • RENTury COMMUNITY, DEVELOPMENT DEr TMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF- 034-90 APPLICATION NO(S) . : R-034-90 PROPONENT': George J. Xenos PROJECT TITLE: Rodgers Rezone BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks to reclassify a 1. 75 acre parcel from R-1, Single-Family Use, to R-3., Medium Density Multi-Family Use, consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The property is currently developed with a single-family home and accessory buildings, which will be demolished if reclassification is achieved, and the property will be then be developed with a multi-family complex; a conceptual site plan has been provided for information only. LOCATION:. 1132 Edmonds Avenue N.E. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 5/4/90 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON APRIL 18 , 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: I ✓akr6p -4)--*a J7 7. "f-e, S APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS "NOT APPROVED S'er ULc e l5e vim/ �GI�/�sl�$ il`` [�e5feel OY E/1rohy)s N E c /-101 (V i .S S d J/Ud• ldi 7�e Y v'��?�/a.�-z . z DY' Li-e c-eris .6" % A5 e C e ` d ie s 5- F.J 7"c� ®da C/d"/2.7 le-/V Opp t t) e_ DATE 4,---iiy, '/22`n SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR UTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT t h ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLISTtt REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: We c r' (11-\\i1 . • DATE CIRCULATED: 4/4/90 COMMENTS DUE:_4/18/90_ ECF 034-90 APPLICATION NO(S) : R-034-90 PROPONENT: George J. Xenos PROJECT TITLE: Rodgers Rezone BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks reclassification of a 1. 75 acre parcel from R-1, Single-Family Use to R-3 , Multi-Family Use, consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The property is currently deeloped with a single-family home and accessory buildings, which will be demolished if reclassification is achieved, and the property will then be developed with a multi-family complex. a conceftual site plan has been provided for information only. LOCATION: 1132 Edmonds Avenue SITE AREA 1. 75 acre BUILDING AREA (gross) : N/A IMPACT REVIEWION ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° 2 . Air 0 ° O ° ° 3 . Water 0 ° 4 . Plants ° 5. Animals ° o ° O 6 . Energy & Natural Resources ° 0 O 7 . Environmental Health ° 0 0 O 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° 0 0 0 9 . ' Housing ° o O 10 . Aesthetics ° 0 o ° O 11. Light & Glare ° ° 12 . Recreation ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° O 14 . 'Transportation ° 15 . Public Services ° 0 0 O ° O 16 . Utilities ° X 0 ° COMMENTS: PLANNING DNISION CITY OF R rToni W pTE2.1ANW IKPRIA11;MENTS P12E IZE6iu-IWO OR SITE aE•vr lePIAiEuT ,,.2 Plin1s wust SU, I11 t, tv,ti 12FUi010 4116 FLAW 15 MK AP?RoJED sueti-net> . tl"�ram...�.r eit.L0 tl ' We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly a$sess this proposal. N'Evauv (caua/ „' 4/ I a / Qo Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date • RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF- 034-90 APPLICATION NO (S) . : R-034-90 PROPONENT: George J. Xenos PROJECT TITLE: Rodgers Rezone BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks to reclassify a 1. 75 acre parcel from R-1, Single-Family Use, to R-3 , Medium Density, Multi-Family Use, consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The property is currently ' ' developed with a single-family home and accessory buildings, which will be demolished if reclassification is achieved, and the property will be then be developed with a multi-family complex; a conceptual site plan has been provided for information only. LOCATION: 1132 Edmonds Avenue N.E. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 5/4/90 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON APRIL 18, 1990. • WATER REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: UVA1ER UTilM f &P, • APPROVED . APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED FOR Raoise oi►LY. WAleRMA1N IMP20/6116fs WILL BE 264UiREp RM PRoposeD vevELopmuor PLANS MUST se Su6Nirfo Fog 1R.tviEW Wait 1D Si-re vEvaanin41- yliE PLAu (At noPosED 42-($u1 APA�xc14T iS Nor APptzov6o Ass Utg ft;-MN>, kr2ouv 60,,A4/ DATE A?Rit, l$) Ivio SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 FEE APPLICATION: I DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET cAl ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET • L l PLAN REVIEW ROUTING SLIP OTHER• DATE: / -gD APPLICANT: iG� O /4• .P�Lo���t-!� JOB ADDRESS: //�3�� � h , �� NATURE OF WORK: ' , £2pt �,,�yaZ / 'rrt144-) DI PROPERTY MANAGEMENT Y-1 i-i9D DATE RECEIVED Comments Due BY PROPERTY MGMT. L74-14-90 Comments or suggestions regarding this application should be provided in writing. Please provide comments to the Comm. Dev. Dept. (C.D.D.) by 5:00 p.m. on above date. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION C?)ufr/3-`i- FEES APPLIED ri CANNOT APPLY FEES ❑ LEGAL DESCRIPTION NEED MORE INFORMATION a SQUARE FOOTAGE ❑ FRONT FOOTAGE ❑VICINITY MAP It is the intent of this development fee analysis to put the developer/owner on notice, that the fees quoted below will apply to the subject site upon development of the property. All quoted fees are due and payable at the time the construction permit is issued to install the on-site and off-site improvements (i .e. underground utilities, street improvements, etc.) PROJECT COST LATECOMER LATECOMER AGREEMENT(- WATER NO PER. FTG. FEE ' CITY HELD vi - E .Eoav:llc. lyp2'/ s�9/ .lo/ 25G: ' a .o/ �°4`-G PRIVATE DEVELOPER HELD --4) - LATECOMERS AGREEMENT - SEWER CITY HELD —0- PRIVATE DEVELOPER HELD SPECIAL UTILITY CONNECTION CHARGE - WATER UNITS SUCC FEE Single family residential dwelling unit $300/lot x Apartment, Condo, each multiplex unit $175/ea. unit x tea. O7 ,350. oa 4( Commercial/Industrial $.04/sq. ft. of property x SPECIAL UTILITY CONNECTION CHARGE - SEWER Single family residential dwelling unit $300/lot x Apartment, condo, each multiplex unit $175/ea. unit x ¢;Z, #7 35D,00 * Commercial/Industrial $.04/sq.ft. of property x SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DIS ' ICT (H.spital Area) WATER UNITS SAD FEE DEVELOPMENTS WITH 1500 'M FI' FLOWS OR LESS: Area Charge $0.034 'er sq.ft. x Frontage Charge $16 ► O per front ft. x DEVELOPMENTS WITH GREATE' 1HAN 1500 GPM FIRE FLOWS: Area Charge $0.04:, pe sg.ft. x Frontage Charge ;:18.00 per front ft. x --.D-- SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ( onev Crk. Intercptr) - SEWER UNITS SAD FEE AREA CHARGES: Residential dwelling wits, apartments or equivalent • $2 d per dwelling unity Commercial devel . sm-nt: $.05 per sg.ft. o ► gross site area x FRONT FOOTAGE CHARGES: $37.19 per Fro Ft. (on ea. side) x $74.38 per fr.ft. (pr,tv .on both sides of imprv.) x --©- * o 1 /CjgD . TOTAL: $ / /099. 0/- The above quoted fees do NOT include .inspection fees, side sewer permits, r/w permit fees or the cost of water meters. i D g`/ M. • DATE - /�—Ad, Signature of Director or Authorized riresentative RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: p/urY1, LOC a%r- DATE CIRCULATED: 4/4 90 COMMENTS DUE:_4/18/90` ECF 034-90 APPLICATION NO (S) : R-034-90 PROPONENT: George J. Xenos PROJECT TITLE: Rodgers Rezone BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks reclassification of a 1. 75 acre parcel from R-1, Single-Family Use to R-3 , Multi-Family Use, consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The property is currently deeloped with a single-family home and accessory buildings, which will be demolished if reclassification is achieved, and the property will then be developed with a multi-family complex. a conceptual site plan has beeh provided. for information only. LOCATION: 1132 Edmonds Avenue SITE AREA _1. 75 acre BUILDING AREA (gross) : N/A IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° 2 . Air • • 3 . Water 2 ° 4 . Plants ° 5. Animals ° 6 . Energy & Natural Resources ° 7 . Environmental Health ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° 9 . Housing ° ' 10. Aesthetics ° 11. Light & Glare ° 12 . Recreation ° • 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° 14 . Transportation ° 15 . Public Services ° 16. Utilities ° PLANNING DIVISION COMMENTS: Pia sha I I 'be 5 b rifeA oil 22] 3 1IJ Sh c ,RENTON �le- -o v n s fr e�An a n4I y Si S wi 1 �� rei u��c 'A i s 1O vice rep/ nd=: 6;iiVED We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or • areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. -4;1 h -datile,,eile ,e, Signature of Director or .Authorized Representative •%�1 Date RENTUiv COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 'DEPTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF- 034-90 APPLICATION NO(S) . : R-034-90 PROPONENT: George J. Xenos PROJECT TITLE:. Rodgers Rezone BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks to reclassify a 1. 75 acre parcel from R-1, Single-Family Use, to R-3 , Medium Density Multi-Family Use, consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The property is currently developed with 'a single-family home and accessory buildings, which will be demolished if reclassification is achieved, and the property will be then be developed with a multi-family complex; a conceptual site plan has been provided for information only. LOCATION: 1132 Edmonds Avenue N.E. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ' SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 5/4/90 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON APRIL 18, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS )( NOT APPROVED — S--orm A-.S.-B 1 -5 ws V n IV' cha i-e cep-, ipIr2�f .5 0 0 i-Av krd a o rt v e w 1/1 c hh eve 4-v41)t y be CDriz�s 2,11 d,,,c,,,der C & O t9 Kr) roceed -fo o-rthr'cs i /a,-J `5 d-o r we f-co) r9u r r 5 Aa 11 coil Iod li o +h i 2V, Kkv/, CIovr y 5 c - w�4- d�cLyh �� a�� 4 it be � �, C.49cr 1 C- ' {,}-ciavoj ra f 11. or Sao�� barba � ()� 17tih I ydvo Lira/l� l fa . - h. - 'le T O ral L rO.5 r ov/ ,f e,41 Y✓,,P4 )L4�-tQ o 1 P l 4 r� Yka,'1, b� 6t4bm fled +a P w K5- 9Vn°iN �� 4n a °rro a — A 8aF��d .011 W ,j1 voi\o r (je-{ Gr p S ��lairds 511411 bt r>-►.�' �1/ 1 I /rPVI ° c. e r� St -k (cN1 o I !OW eS rl DID '1Gl h t��2� PNif a l'E t�l a�1 X I v, ¢-o e -!c is fiv J2: sy q.'10-i Lcimr-°ids F-v ' fys6 ik z fc- I 'I, e DATE 7-I (D SIGNATURE OF DIR TO OR AUTHORIZED_ REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 RENT. . COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DE____2TMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: •gt,fiejr U# Ir i' s DATE CIRCULATED: 4 4 90 COMMENTS DUE: 4/18/90 ECF 034-90 APPLICATION NO(S) : R-034-90 PROPONENT: George J. Xenos , PROJECT TITLE: Rodsers Rezone BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks reclassification of a 1.75 acre parcel from R-1, Single-Family Use to R-3 , Multi-Family Use, consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The property is currently deeloped with a single-family home and accessory buildings, which will be demolished if reclassification is achieved, and the property will then be developed with a multi-family complex. a conceftual site plan has been provided for information only. LOCATION: 1132 Edmonds Avenue SITE AREA J1. 75 acre BUILDING AREA (gross) : N/A IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° 2 . Air ° 3 . Water ° 4 . Plants ° 5 . Animals ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° 7 . Environmental Health ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° 9 . Housing ° 10. Aesthetics ° 11. Light & Glare ° 12. Recreation S ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° 14 . Transportation ° 15 . Public Services ° 16 . Utilities $ ° COMMENTS: -)i6--rt IAMALL EPAACJO5 ,ate PLANNING DIVISION. CITY OF RENTON APR 2 3 loon We have reviewed this application with particular atter i—o-'h`°to 'these areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional 'nformation is needed to properly assess this proposal. � ,p� 44>4 11 ' a /' 6 i 6 Q( Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date RENTviv COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEi-riRTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF- 034-90 APPLICATION NO(S) . : R-034-90 PROPONENT: George J. Xenos PROJECT TITLE: Rodgers Rezone BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks to reclassify a 1.75 acre parcel from R-1, Single-Family Use, to R-3 , Medium Density Multi-Family Use, consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The property is currently developed with a single-family home and accessory buildings, which will be demolished if reclassification is achieved, and the property will be then be developed with a multi-family complex; a conceptual site plan has been provided for information only. LOCATION: 1132 Edmonds Avenue N.E. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC. DATE: 5/4/90 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON APRIL 18, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS )C NOT APPROVED 14,46 Z M 1 T rkt, /IL DATE , .67-A‘ SI URE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRES NTATIVE REV. 6/88 RENTUN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEr1-ZTMENT ,o ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET cr�'�'��� REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: '4,9.* opt.�`st .,y., i,9 04,ti DATE CIRCULATED: 4/4/90 COMMENTS DUE:_4/18/90 'C�.. 7g,9 ECF 034-90 '�' �` . ' ' APPLICATION NO(S) : .R-034-90 LI'j; p � f PROPONENT: George J. Xenos t ''" PROJECT TITLE: Rodgers Rezone actio,:i iLlii.j U �� BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks reclassification of a 1. 75 acre parcel from R-1, Single-Family Use to R-3 , Multi-Family Use, consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The property is currently deeloped with a single-family home and accessory buildings , which will be demolished if reclassification is achieved, and the property will then be developed with a multi-family complex. a conce[tual site plan has been provided for information only. LOCATION: 1132 Edmonds Avenue SITE AREA 1. 75 acre BUILDING AREA (gross) : N/A IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT . IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° o ° 2 . Air ° o ° ° 3 . Water ° o ° ° . , 4 . Plants ° ° ° ° 5. Animals ° ° ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° 7 . Environmental Health ° o ° ° 8 . , Land & Shoreline Use ° o ° ° 9 . Housing ° o ° ° 10 . Aesthetics ° o ° 11. Light & Glare ° ° ° 12 . Recreation `, / ° ° ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° o ° ° 14 . Transportation ° o ° ° 15 . Public Services ° o ° ° 16. Utilities ° COMMENTS: 0 11 r : ; ! --- "?e -��J- 34 7743,-.P�� ?�- 0M - , tea\ 1 -,q r C G re 1 r b' --t , Ze,e 4S C -fit- \, ,,,,_.7,,,,_.7e' --' ,. :- "se-&. .S`° -- e ' `,^- % / e ctY✓ -,s.:- We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas we additional information is needed to properly assess this • propos c Signature of Direc or or Authorized Representative Date RENTOi COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEP .2MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ,� V i1V ECF- 034-90 APPLICATION NO (S) . : R-034-907� ' ._ mo PROPONENT: George J. Xenos , 4`;• En A PROJECT TITLE: Rodgers Rezone '� 4i,�ti ln, JA t BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks to reclassify-a'-11. 75 acre parcel from R-1, Single-Family Use, to R-3 , Medium Density Multi-Family Use, consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The property is currently developed with a single-family home and accessory buildings, which will be demolished if reclassification is achieved, and the property will be then , ,, , be developed with a multi-family complex; a conceptual site plan has been provided for information only. LOCATION: 1132 Edmonds Avenue N.E. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 5/4/90 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED `IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00, P.M. ON APRIL 18 , 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: • APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED • • • DATE SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE. REV. 6/88 REN'__ : COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DL_�_RTMENT PLANNiN DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET APR 1 8 iqq[ REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: CJ.orc.v t 111WWILAL1 DATE CIRCULATED: 4/4/90 COMMENTS DUE: 4/18/90 ECF 034-90 APPLICATION NO(S) : R-034-90 PROPONENT: George J. Xenos PROJECT TITLE: Rodgers Rezone • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks reclassification of a 1. 75 acre parcel from R-1, Single-Family Use to R-3 , Multi-Family Use, consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The property is currently deeloped with a single-family home and accessory buildings, which will be demolished if reclassification is achieved, and the property will then be developed with a multi-family complex. a conce[tual site plan has been provided for information only. LOCATION: 1132 Edmonds Avenue SITE AREA 1. 75 acre BUILDING AREA (gross) : N/A IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° 2 . Air ° 3 . Water ° 4 . Plants ° 5. Animals . ° ° 6. Energy & Natural .Resources ° 7 . Environmental Health ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° 9 . Housing ° 10. . Aesthetics •° ° . 11.. Light & Glare °• ° 12 . Recreation ° o 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° 14 . Transportation ° 15. Public Services • ° 16. Utilities ° COMMENTS: Ztvu(71 , m�'Ci IPu Wluu WC ,.�IR.� PIDb�rto,uA1, Ct\v�RWIt ►evlgt, utet(iW' Stiff \ tI k) pKW Su& i rfl Ppuccib,M. PDSS1+A lA WI-5 1.75 Ptt.x z5= 43 urvs7'S rm R'�I�N�IaLo' We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. 44110 Signature of Direc or Authorized Representative Date RENT,-JA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DE.L.-21. TMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-- 034-90 APPLICATION NO(S) . : R-034-90 PROPONENT: George J. Xenos PROJECT TITLE: Rodgers Rezone BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks to reclassify a 1. 75 acre parcel from R-1, Single-Family Use, to R-3 , Medium Density Multi-Family Use, consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The property is currently developed with a single-family home and accessory buildings, which will be demolished if reclassification is achieved, and the property will be then be developed with a multi-family complex; a conceptual site plan has been provided for information only. LOCATION: 1132 Edmonds Avenue N.E. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 5/4/90 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT . t BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON APRIL 18, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: boK, ,,okyf rb 1k)ilU,7 NontOkJ- APPROVED )(APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED • \- tr,,oyvvilrteues R zon cf 'i'RopOtr( TO R-3. 1o1 : cork gp-Iuac. 31/6 PcANC is roof f PPouEo'o ',e 1 U x d DATE 4 -710 SIGNATURE OF DIR _, OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 RENT:.,., COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEI„i ;TMENT '° 4'c�� F� ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET e�% Q(O/tr N REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: atILA / i ,9 DATE CIRCULATED: 4/4/90 COMMENTS DUE:_4/18/90 �a/f' , ECF 034-90 APPLICATION NO (S) : R-034-90 ll f� rt�i r l� PROPONENT: George J. Xenos . . F APR 4 •1990 1)11 PROJECT TITLE: Rodgers Rezone f BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks reclassific tion of a 1. 75 acre parcel from R-1, Single-Family Use to R-3 , Multi-Family Use,--donsistentj with the Comprehensive Plan. The property is currently deeloped with a single-family home and accessory buildings, which will be demolished if reclassification is achieved, and the property will then be developed with a multi-family complex. a conce[tual site plan has been provided for information only. LOCATION: 1132 Edmonds Avenue SITE AREA 1. 75 acre BUILDING AREA (gross) : N/A IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° o ° ° 2 . Air . ° ° 0 ° 3 . Water ° o ° ° 4 . Plants ° ° ° ° 5 . Animals ° o ° ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° ° ° 7 . Environmental Health ° o ° ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° ° ° 9 . Housing IX ° o ° ° 10 . Aesthetics ° o ° ° 11. Light & Glare ° o ° 12 . Recreation ° ° ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° o ° ° 14 . Transportation ° o ° ° 15 . Public Services ° ° ° 16. Utilities ° COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal ,... .-. .e.....-... cl.,74100.— -;/,//7- 7 ci \ SigilAtWof Director or Authorized Representative Date RENTGi., COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEF-1,2MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF- 034-90 APPLICATION NO (S) . : R-034-90 PROPONENT: George J. Xenos PROJECT TITLE: Rodgers Rezone BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks to reclassify a 1. 75 acre parcel from R-1, Single-Family Use, to R-3 , Medium Density Multi-Family •Use, consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The property is currently developed with a single-family home and accessory buildings, which will be demolished if reclassification is achieved, and the property will be then be developed with a multi-family complex; a conceptual site plan has been provided for information only. LOCATION: 1132 Edmonds Avenue N.E. • TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 5/4/90 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION. OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON APRIL 18 , 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: L� APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED /Ue°"'4-ram . DATE 1/-7/9 a SIGNATURE D CTOR OR AUTHO IZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 r REM, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DE _... 2TMENT o1')-ff!/ ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET o `94 %04, O; " 0 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: TISIKJcww O s _ DATE CIRCULATED: 4 4 90 COMMENTS DUE: 4 18 90 N, ECF 034-90 APPLICATION NO(S) : R-034-90 PROPONENT: George J. Xenos PROJECT TITLE: Rodgers Rezone BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks reclassification of a 1. 75 acre parcel from R-1, -Single-Family Use to R-3 , Multi-Family Use, consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The property is currently deeloped with a single-family home and accessory buildings, which will be demolished if reclassification is achieved, and the property will then be developed with a multi-family complex. a concertual site plan has been provided for information only. LOCATION: 1132 Edmonds Avenue SITE AREA 1. 75 acre • BUILDING AREA (gross) : N/A IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 0 ° ° O O . 2 . Air ° O ° 0 3 . Water ° O O ° 4 . Plants 0 0 0 O O ° 5 . Animals ° O O O 6 . Energy & Natural Resources 0 ° 0 7 . ` Environmental Health 0 ° O ° 0 8. Land & Shoreline Use ° 0 O O O 9 . Housing ° ° ° 10. Aesthetics ° O O O 11. Light & Glare ° o ° ° 12 . Recreation 0 0 0 o O O 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° o ° O 14 . Transportation ° ° ° 15 . Public Services ✓ ° O O O 16 . Utilities 0 0 ° COMMENTS: � O 4��� �C 6 �t I�v1 V 3(6P'° (-1 -- it- OtuiL 6L h asbt -c__ , ., . We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposa- . Ii(AAJUAr4Yra Signat re of Director o± Authorized Representative Date RENT(' COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DE1 TMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF- 034-90 APPLICATION NO(S) . : R-034-90 PROPONENT: George J. Xenos PROJECT TITLE: Rodgers Rezone BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks to reclassify a 1. 75 acre parcel from R-l., Single-Family Use, to R-3 , Medium Density Multi-Family Use, consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The property is currently developed with a single-family home and accessory buildings, which will be demolished if reclassification is achieved, and the property will be then be developed with a multi-family complex; a conceptual site plan has been. provided for information only. LOCATION: 1132 Edmonds Avenue N.E. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT _ SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 5/4/90 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED. HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: . tCOMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON APRIL 18, 1990. REVIEEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: YAPPROVED . APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED Obj) \r.f Rrop6ck Stitu (uPpe_045 \taa (NM Gd,40- mA, ‘ 03 NO/a A rt!(-- ces VUw DATE V(-U0) SIGNATURE OF DIRE TOR 0 AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 RENT__. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DE1�,.aTMENT �0,ts 041, kilPft; Al ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ` 9 6 f000 REVIEWING (-MIM041-cfMCLAULLti .4..1 ILe • DATE CIRCULATED: 4/4/90 COMMENTS DUE: 4/18/90 ECF 034-90- APPLICATION NO(S) : R-034-90 PROPONENT: George J. Xenos PROJECT TITLE: Rodgers Rezone BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks reclassification of a 1. 75 acre parcel from R-1, Single-Family Use to R-3 , Multi-Family Use, consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The property is currently deeloped with a single-family home and accessory buildings, which will be demolished if reclassification is achieved, and the property will then be developed with a multi-family complex. •a conce[tual site plan has been provided for information only. LOCATION: 1132 Edmonds Avenue „ SITE AREA 1. 75 acre BUILDING AREA (gross) : N/A IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR ,MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT 'IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° ° ° 2- Air ° 3 . Water ° ° ° 4 . Plants ° ° ° 5. Animals ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources. ° ° ° 7 . Environmental Health ' ° ° ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° 9 . Housing ° 10 . Aesthetics ° ° ' 11. , Light & Glare ° ° ° 12 . Recreation ° ° ° ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° ° ° ° 14 . Transportation ° ° ° ° ° 15. Public Services ° ° ° 16. Utilities ° COMMENTS: T l co-r J L, n 20,v rJ,a I rieleL 119 7.12V pt4wy�, owNetZ 17M-C410(o LA-1 oi9T 'Do J vor" Prial,Pz y Off. S i z" OFtboczw.0 r i s . YRo�rr- lRasw. t c-L-o*A14- t' Poo2-1 LLD We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this propos 1. ' 4/4/74' Signa re o Director or, Authorized Representative Date RENTO11 LOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPk..:1.MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF- 034-90 APPLICATION NO(S) . : R-034-90 PROPONENT: George J. Xenos PROJECT TITLE: Rodgers Rezone BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks to reclassify a 1. 75 acre parcel from R-1, Single-Family Use, to R-3 , Medium Density Multi-Family Use, consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The property is currently developed with a single-family home and accessory buildings, which will be demolished if reclassification is achieved, and the property will be then be developed with a multi-family complex; a conceptual site plan has been provided for information only. LOCATION: 1132 Edmonds Avenue N.E. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 5/4/90 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION ' PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00, P.M. ON APRIL 18, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: L.Ot,,(27 ,p 1�c -J►_lld(� APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED i ` 1, o U SZ' 1:/e.‘►coa ert4 J 'c t S.ve' c S (t1421bluN4, bey., yri itto 1.,1.E ,,Ly ►aL� ~ itA 3toe LoC is-3o 'Pt..) A..)6 ua. /4-urt. 714+17 1408154CM-+r P20Ab•2r Zit A POP%[3ert to)a ifs w,r w/ nEz' Lome Pam. 11*w zn..,0.3to u r.ca4 savl...s AffruoPrz,are- Cvwl5^+ 1 Z-1 , rz'Z Anv0 3-I It..► fie? timf-te[QIA4T Lelc►N4r1. 'IH-- 51 R4-n101n..l‘ 01=''''' z, P,icvL user IIMPtio1/dM6r,. Czerlfterz.. pr-.ou,,T5 mr- c91V-3 sPA-ez-- c�outb ass ls.cvv dev p ' ua- eve 7/1,2%4101D, 13t.aL,y 3 4, 4 D.2e' SvaR-euNtsth 3y P ,1-lac, LorS w/ 1.) . t- Re[.rt ,`1°N1A4- I°Mil7.3w rI 3. -.4 CaGalATVOL siir A+ya>NZr o z s .c)c a,u Vitr- 2 - it9oL9,-D 3E- vis,Pw1✓. iiac,� DATE �44t SIGNATURE OF DIRECT R 0 AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 REN- i COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT D'`_�,RTMEN'ENTON FIRE DEPT. FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET • APR 0 41! O REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 71IY-a- Fe,--tom DATE CIRCULATED: 4./4/90 COMMENTS DUE:_4/18/99 EC sED ECF 034-90 APPLICATION NO(S) : ' R-034-90 PROPONENT: Geor•e J. Xenos PROJECT TITLE: Rodgers Rezone BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks reclassification of a 1. 75 acre parcel from R-1, Single-Family Use 'to R-3 , Multi-Family Use, consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The property- is currently deeloped with a single-family home and accessory buildings, which will be demolished if reclassification is achieved, and the property will 'then be developed with a multi-family complex. a conceftual site plan has been provided for information only. LOCATION: 1132 Edmonds Avenue SITE AREA 1. 75 acre BUILDING AREA (gross) : N/A IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE • PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth • ° 2 . Air • ° ° 3 . Water ° 4 . Plants ° 5 . • Animals ° ° 6 . Energy & Natural Resources ° • 7 . Environmental Health ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use • ° 9 . Housing ° 10. Aesthetics . ° 11. Light & Glare ° r* 12 . Recreation ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° • ° 14 . Transportation ° 15 . Public Services ° 16. Utilities ° COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal 1114-0L1-7-' /99d Signature of Director or Authorized Representative D to RENTG : COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEP. . MENT . _ DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF- 034-90 APPLICATION NO (S) . : R-034-90 PROPONENT: George J. Xenos , PROJECT TITLE: Rodgers Rezone BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks to reclassify a 1.75 acre parcel from R-1, Single-Family Use, to R-3 , Medium Density Multi-Family Use, consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The property is currently developed with a single-family home and accessory buildings, which will be demolished if reclassification is achieved, and the property will be then be developed with a multi-family complex; a conceptual site plan has been provided. for information only. LOCATION: • 1132 Edmonds Avenue N.E. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 5/4/90 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. 'DIVISION . SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES' ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT • COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON APRIL 18, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: %APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED aSle/ iee-al e04i-d4aCresie „11.14.Ze --h /4.-e.x.4r-/ -4 el.144d /61.4c,04%-, , DATE 4Q44J y,/ SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE • REV. 6/88 '+t,y CITY OF RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Planning Division • November 27, 1989 George J. Xenos 1616 156th Avenue N.E. #115 Bellevue, Washington 98008 RE: Rodgers Rezone, 1132 Edmonds Avenue N.E. . Dear Mr. Xenos: Staff have now completed a preliminary review of the application materials for the above-referenced rezone application. Based upon that analysis, it has been determined that some additional materials are necessary in order to submit your application for environmental review by the City. To begin, we will require a soils study to be completed by a certified geological engineer. This study is necessary because site topography may limit the density and type of multi-family development which could be• permitted on the subject property. While such limits would not necessarily contraindicate reclassification, there is an obligation to have. full information concerning characteristics of and limitations upon a property prior to making changes to classifications of parcels. Additionally, we would strongly recommend that you provide a conceptual site plan for the subject property. This conceptual site plan is recommended so that the applicant and the owner of the property, as well as City representatives, will have a better understanding of the type of use envisioned for the property and of those opportunities/constraints which may affect development (such as site topography, proximity of neighboring developments) . This information increases the likelihood that City staff and the Hearing Examiner could support the reclassification application. Finally, because neighboring residential land uses are so near to the subject property, there is considerable probability that development on this site will affect those properties. In order to determine the type of impacts which may be anticipated, we would like to have structural entryways, windows, and patios, landscaping and parking on those sites depicted on your plans for reclassification. When we have received the above-described materials, we will be pleased to immediately resume review of your application. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 Facsimile (206) 235-2513 , ' George J. Xenos November 27, 1989 Page 2 If you have questions, please contact me at 235-2550. Sincerely, Lenora Blauman Project Manage cc: S. M. Rodgers 11111 N.E. 3rd Street Bellevue, Washington 98004 Elsie M. Seel 2213 N.E. 8th Street Renton, Washington .716kVi. CITE -_ )F RENTON .ii1 Community Development Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Kenneth E.Nyberg,Director April 3,,1990 George J. Xenos 1616 156th Avenue N.E., #115 Bellevue, Washington 98008 Re: Rodgers Rezone, 1132 Edmonds Avenue N.E. (R-034-90) Dear Mr. Xenos: The Community Development Department has formally accepted the above referenced application for preliminary review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Technical Advisory Committee on May 4, 1990. Within three days of that review you will be notified that: 1) your application is complete and has been scheduled for environmental review and determination, or 2) that additional information is required to continue processing your application for environmental review. If you have any questions, please contact Lenora Blauman, project manager, of our office at 235-2550. Sincerely, (:)44 jit • Donald K. Erickson, AICP Chief, Current Planning • DKE/amd 0 • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 MW Y d S §y i 7nlliti c v7• iPx/W�x+� awn' �Y 5 y�p7 x a M x'SF(A� S n� f ti >t; • �.f.4(.����yyyy�� L��}��+,*} • Y(I1�7. .. yt'r: • :::::::;.::.��•:}::C::;i�i:;:{{;ji:?•}.}••4i:isii}::{:C:.: >.::}?:::$;i4ii$}:^:•:•:tii:;:i?{>::C.:;;•iiii:?L}i:::{:i:•i:'•.isJ:•}i}}:?•}::>::isv:•:{v:{{:}:}:v}$:.'•:•}:'.:�.•:Ji:•:v:v:•:?:?ti}:v':•i:•}ii::{{;: • ......... ..........• ......•• FirFe*e}i `hrnrrh 1 4, irF•.-. 1 1 t r1 l i i 7 I N....�..}I .......:;FTiTh .m,:.:�.iii*•'.. Fr.i..t.::Fi'..n::: :Fii...i:...::;: ::7:'.I::-.. ..... . TI NOTE TO APPLICANT: Since this.is;a comprehensive application form, only those items related to your specific type of application(s) are to be completed. Please print or type, and attach additional sheets if necessary. f�• APPLICANT TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES- NAME: S. MICHAEL RODGERS X *REZONE FROM( R-1 TO R—3) $ [p40,0D SPECIAL PERMIT ' ADDRESS: TEMPORARY PERMIT • 11111 N.E. 3rd STREET CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT SITE PLAN APPROVAL CITY: ZIP: _SPECIAL PERMIT - GRADE&FILL BELLEVUE, WA.• 98004 . (NO. CU.YDS: ) *VARIANCE TELEPHONE NUMBER: _ (FROM SECTION: 455-1110 ROUTINE VEGETATION • MANAGEMENT PERMIT •CONTACT PERSON (*JUSTIFICATION REQUIRED) NAME: SUBDIVISION: $ GEORGE J. XENOS • • _SHORT PLAT ADDRESS: TENTATIVE PLAT 1616-156th AVE. N.E. #115 __PRELIMINARY PLAT _FI • NAL PLAT CITY: ZIP: _*WAIVER BELLEVUE, WA. 98008 *(JUSTIFICATION REQUIRED) NO. OF LOTS: TELEPHONE NUMBER: • PLAT NAME: • 747-1260 • PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ OWNER • PRELIMINARY . NAME: FINAL ELSIE M. SEEL P.U.D.NAME: ADDRESS: 2213 N.E. 8th STREET —BINDING SITE PLAN: $ CITY: ZIP: RENTON, WA. 98056 MOBILE HOME PARKS: $ TELEPHONE NUMBER: 255-5238 _TENTATIVE _PRELIMINARY LOCATION . FINAL PROPERTY ADDRESS: PARK NAME: 113 2•' EDMONDS AVENUE N.E. No. OF SPACES: EXISTING USE: RESIDENTIAL PRESENT / • ZOUNG: . (R-1) i ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $ go.00 PROPOSED USE: MULTIPLE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT TOTAL FEES: $702Q O !.'ec e. o� #2b5• AREA: • SQ.FT.OF PROPERTY: ACRE • ��prvilGc.�E:( S: 76 ,586 S.Q. FT. 1. 75 ACRES 1�I 190 • PLAN NING.DIVISION 'STAFF USE ONLY- -ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING CITY OF RFmreal I DATE RECEI APPLICATION RECEIVED &DETERMINED TO BE: NUY 14 .1989 • DATE ROU E c c /t U =NCTIFICATION SENT: OMPLETEONOTIFICATION SENT: •-. I BY: Master Application Form • Page 2 Legal description of property (if more space is required, please attach a separate sheet). THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE WEST 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF, THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 9 , TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M. EXCEPT THE SOUTH 75 FEET THEREOF: EXCEPT THE WEST 30 FEET THEREOF FOR EDMONDS AVENUE NORTHEAST: SITUATED IN. THE CITY OF RENTONI COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. • • • • ' I . f AFFIDAVIT • I, ELSIE M. SEEL , being duly sworn, declare that I am (please check one) the authorized representative to act for the property owner, X the owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS 17thDAY OF OCTOBER, • 19 89 NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, RESIDING� AT: 6,74)-] j Wa41 ,6A.Lo-pp,s---2-2-50 ri (Name of /4- otary P blic) (Signature of Owner) 10g- )deliC/ 2213 N.E. 8th Street (Address)//�-- ll nn,, (Address) L�Gi:T7/� (�/ Qffose, Renton, Wa. 98056 (City/State/Zip) (City/State/Zip) orio--0 ?-7k50 255-5238 (Telephone) (Telephone) • Acceptance of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete application. Plans and other material required to constitute a complete application are listed in the "Application Procedure." RtnMastr Revised 9/8 9 • OF R4, ECF: t 6314-10 J t% 'CC) z City of Renton LU: LR_o3410 ' ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 0,9i1' ED SEPI0"1""P Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter, 43,21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for allproposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency Identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each -question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impacts. Use of Checklist for Nonproject Proposals: (Please Type or Print Legibly) Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Rodgers Reclassification 2. Name of applicant: ' S. Michael Rodgers 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Applicant-- 455-1110 11111 N.E. 3rd St. Bellevue, Wa. 98004 Contact Person--747-1260 1616-156th Ave. NE #115 Bellevue, Wa. 98008 GO 4. Date checklist prepared: 3/26/90 cny ReNro/v 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton MAR 2 6 1990 6. Proposed timinn or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Ec4Z, ' ' Summer •of` 1991 �� • • • 7. Do you have any plans for future additions. expansions, or further activity related ' . to or connected with this proposal? if yes, explain.. • • Yes, The owner will be submitting for Site Plan Approval and building permit upon the completion of the reclassification. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will ' be prepared, directly related to this proposal. None 9 Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? if yes, explain. None 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Reclassification Site Plan Approval ' Building Permit 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. • This proposal is requesting a reclassification from 'the existing • R-1 zoning designation to R-3 in order that the property can be • developed for multiple family dwellings in the future. Proposed; 42 units in four buildings with 84 parking spaces 12. : Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand • the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of • area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topography map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. . The property is situated on the east side of Edmonds Avenue N.E. approximately 175 feet north of Sunset Blvd. N.E. Northwest a of Section 9 , Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. 1132-Edmonds Avenue N.E. B. • ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one); flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other Gentle sloping. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? Approximately 20 pe.rcent at the Swly corner along R/W c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, caly, sand, • gravel, peat, muck)? if you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. See goetechnical report prepared by Associated Earth Sciences. Sand/Gravel Indianola Loamy Sand (Soil Survey King County Area Soil Service) d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. • None r 2 - • • • e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. None at this time. Minor grading at the time of development. . f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. None anticipated. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? The completed development will comply with the Lot Coverage requirements of the R-3 Residence District. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Proper construction practices . 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. The site will experience minor emissions from construction equipment during development. After completion, automobile emissions from cars going to and from the development. b. Are there any off-site sources of emission? None. c. , Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: None. 3. WATER a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal: streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. None. 2) • Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans.. No. • 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site , that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None. - 3. - • • 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximately quantities if known. None. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. • No. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. ' • b. . Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and appaoximately quantities if ' known. • No. • 2) Describe . waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals . . agricultural; etc.). • Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None. • c. Water Runoff (including storm water): • • 1). Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Storm and surface water will be directed to an approved retention/detention system per City of Renton requirements which will then flow into the existing system serving Edmonds Ave. N.E. and Sunset Blved. N.E. r " 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally. describe. None ,anticipated. ' - 4 - • d. ' Proposed measures to reduce or control surface. ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Conformance with City of Renton storm drainage requirements. 4. Plants • a.. CFlck or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: al__de wally y aspen, other te< vergreen tree: f cedar, pine, other rr' Shrubs . di-grass o crop or grain o Wet soil plants: cattail. buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other o water plants: water lily. eel grass, milfoil, other a other types of vegetation • - b.. . What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? • Vegetation removal will be limited to that needed to accomodate the future improvements. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve • or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: As much of the existing vegetation will be retained as possible . at the time of development. Residential landscaping per city code requirements. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: Hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other Robins/sparrows _ Mammals: deer, bear, elk. beaver, other . Squirrels Fish: bass, salmon, trout. herring, shellfish, other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Unknown. • - 5 • - d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. The completed development will use electricity and natural gas for lighting and heating purposes. • b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. • c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures• to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Unknown at this time. 7. . Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. None. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None. . 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None. b. Noise • 1) . What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? . Minor traffic noise from Sunset Blvd. it t;.F'• ;'f i'. :c, • • 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? " Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Short-term noise from construction equipment at the .time of development. Long-term noise from traffic traveling to and from the site after completion which should be minor. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None. . 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The site is currently used as a single family residence. • North: Multiple family South: Convalescent Center East: Multiple family West: Vacant, steep slopes b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No. c. Describe any structures on the site. House,( garage and shed. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? All of them. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? R-1 Residential Zone. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? R-3 Residence District. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A h. . Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No. i. Approximately how many people would •reside or work in the completed project? Approximately 43 families . j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace?• One family k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None. - 7 - 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Development in conformance to the R-3 zoning. 9. . . Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Approximatley 43 middle-income housing units. b. Approximately how many units. if any. would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. !' One middle-income unit. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None. 10. Aesthetics • a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. Unknown at this time. However, development will comply with City of Renton development requirements. • b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? • Unknown. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Proper design and construction. • 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? The future development will. require lighting for safty and security purposes associated with residential housing. • b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? . No. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. • II ', . • • 'j, d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None. • - 8 - • • 12. Recreation • a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Playfield at Mc Knight Middle School Parks : Sunset Court, North Highlands, Gene Coulon Lake. • b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, • describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. None. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. • None known. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Access will via Edmonds Ave. N.E. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximately distance to the nearest transit stop? No. There is public transit of Sunset Blvd. approximately 175 feet c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? 1. 75 spaces per unit of the development. none will be eliminated. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to "'' existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No. • • • - 9 - e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. . f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, Indicate when peak volumes would occur. Approximately 200 trips per day.. ' Peak volumes of 7-8 A.M. & 5-6 P.M. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: None. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Minor increase in fire and police protection only. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services. If any. None. • • 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricit u .tural gas, valEgik e use service Atirrilliivisttlintall=p septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Puget Power, Washington Nat' l gas , City of Renton water and Sewer, Pacific Northwest Bell C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misreprese tation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: Name Printed: George J. enos - 10 - • o D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (This sheet should only be used for actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs. Do not use this sheet for project actions.) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the Item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not Implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms.. I. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous sutstances; or production of noise? The development of this property to R-3 Residence District should only have minor impact on the noise and air quality in the area. There will be no production, storage or release of toxic or haz- ardous substances as a result of development. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: None except for compliance to City Storm Water management requirements. 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? None. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: Retention of as much existing vegetation as possible. 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Minor if any at all. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: Proper insulation will go a long way in conserving energy. • 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas • or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? N/A Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: None. • - 11 - a 5. ~ How would the proposal be likely to affect land and DI tut-Wine use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? N/A Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: N/A 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? No additional increase in the demand for transportation or utilities since they already serve the site. Minor increase in public services such as fire and police protection. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: None. 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. None that we know of. • SIGNATURE I. the undersigned. state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It Is understood that the lead agency .may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist , • should there be any willful misrepreIan ,atio or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: - o j snd Name Printed: George X s • - 12 - CONFERENCE REPORT NAME OF PROJECT: C�Q)&a . U DATE OF CONFERENCE: l I c,9 1 Tci PROJECT NO. PCB .1.-- TIME: 10 A !✓\ (START) I .0 `_ 2-0 A A4 (END) NAME AND TITLE OF ORGANIZATION PHONE PEOPLE ATTENDING . • aSS-196 _ -1\4,,.L • r74-7 - 1 a CC c.. 0 .,_A - 0 P , . . ass -as__ • 0 COMMENTS: vNr... 4,03 9,_, 1 \1 ,SC x ci , ,<\ p. i �.(9--Ux_ ( , 3-u) ir�� 01 L r. CA..),4.-4A ` _ c� ems/ �'` Q ��:Q� ?U--(-N • ' -\--,--°__e_..„ (9-7s c L Q„_-_,, e0 \.),AS A),:b at----,,_ /3 t(--e— A A i ESL r, -)`-31-V.).3,- C AstiL.A.A_L-- ._)s- -0-4--60--yUl___ EA 'all- --K:&_ \ LL21 onn�er\Q-- C _o.4),__,<Lut h 0 1 J 0— 0-4-Y\—al i2lLt_x__ckSCL CA i -.0 . C 04-- S%-) Cr CZ3-1A---' ' C\-/lb--12- 7\kSS--.- V- 1 9—7 e--Q{L"‘--CZ Z---_ b___Zi.X9__i p.,L ___, - �6-,�, 1�u-�-�J �� "s' cam- �-e ate_ �-� e ..� _ \A '') * V X. \ Q_� 0.X� �Q O O, :-..A a Ar?t • PROPERTY DEVELOPmEnT AffOC . LAND CONSULTANTS George J. Xenos • 1616 - 156th NE #115 (206) 747- 1•260 Bellevue, Wa. 98008 November 9 , 1989 Mcf�or II/00N re Ms. Lenora Blauman iVrolv City of Renton NOV 1 4 1989 Senior Planner 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Wa. 98055 � gVei RE: Application for reclassification of the property situated at 1132 Edmonds Avenue N.E. Dear Ms. Blauman: On behalf of Ms. Elsie M. Seel, the owner of the property of this application, we respectfully submit this request for re- classification. The property is presently zoned R-1 and we are proposing an R-3 designation. Approval of this application would allow for the future development of this property for a multiple family residential development. We believe that our request is appropriate and justified in that it is in conformance with the goals and policies of the City ', of Renton Comprehensive Plan as approved by City Ordinance #3976 ' in March of 1986 . The application is consistant with the following policies elements of the plan: LAND USE ELEMENT • The land use map indicates that Medium Density Multi- family development is appropriate for the property. I. ENVIRONMENTAL GOAL. A. Balanced Development Objective. Policies 1 and 2 III . URBAN DESIGN GOAL A. Land Development Objective. Policy 4 The improvement of this property as a multi-family housing development is economically feasible and would not over burdon the existing public services. There are adequate transportation services and public utilities services available to accommodate the future development. F l IV. RESIDENTIAL GOALS A. Neighborhoods Objective Policy 1 C. Housing Density Objective Policies 3 and 8 The completed development will provide affordable housing for a variety of family units convenient to centers of employment, shopping facilities, schools , and public recreation. Our proposal would also be compatible with the character of area and the adjacent land uses. Duplex development of R-2 density abuts the property to the east. The property to the north consists of the Renton Hills Apartments. This property was reclassified to R-3 under ordinances 2233 , 2263 , and 3566 . The property to the south consists of the Highland Convalescent Center and was reclassified to R-3 under ordinance 1993 and 2676 . We are hopeful that through your review of our application you recognize the merits of our request for reclassification. Our proposal is in conformance with the City Comprehensive Plan, the adequacy of public services, the proximity of the property to shopping and employment centers, and the lands natural capacity for development as a. medium density multi-family development. The future development of the property at the requested R-3 zoning designation would increase the supply of affordable housing within a developed area of the City on land that is not environmentally sensitive. This is important considering the present vacancy rate Hof the City of Renton which the Cain and Scott Apartment Vacancy •report indicates is approximatly 3.4 percent. Thank you for your assistance and cooperation in this matter. Should you need any any additional information, please feel free to call on me. Sincerely, 1 -George J. a os PLEASE DIRECT CORRESPONDENCE TO: Transamerica No. : 0797101 Transamerica Title Insurance Co. Customer No. : 3571 320 108th Avenue N.E. Seller : Seel P.O. Box 1493 Buyer/Borrower : Rodgers Bellevue, WA 98009 Prepared for: By IMPERIAL REAL ESTATE 1 Officer 1730 MINOR AVE, 14TH FLOOR SEATTLE, WA 98101 For service on this order, call: ATTN: JEANNE 646-8580/1-800-441-7701 LIZ SIMPSON, DAVID P. CAMPBELL or RANDY L. RIEMAN (FAX *646-8593) SCHEDULE A EFFECTIVE DATE: October 10, 1989 at 8:00 A.M. 1 . Policy or policies to be issued: Amount (X) Alta Owner's Policy (6-1-87) $300,000.00 Premium $920,00 ( ) Alta Owner's Policy-1970 Tax $ 74.52 (Amended 10-17-70) Standard Policy Proposed Insured: S. MICHAEL RODGERS AND MARCIA A. RODGERS, HUSBAND AND WIFE Total $994 .52 2. Title to fee simple estate or interest in said land is at the effective date hereof vested in: ' ELSIE M. SEEL, AS HER SEPARATE ESTATE 3. The land referred to in this commitment is situated in the County of King, State of Washington and is described as follows: -see attached- Pi -O ®��IoN Nov ' 4oN 1989 DESCRIPTION: 1/2 OF THE WEST 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST W.M. ; EXCEPT THE SOUTH 75 FEET THEREOF; AND EXCEPT THE WEST 30 FEET THEREOF FOR EDMONDS AVENUE NORTHEAST; SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. • PAGE 2 0797101 SCHEDULE B EXCEPTIONS: Schedule B of the policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following matters unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company. A. Standard exceptions set forth on inside back cover. B. Defects, liens , encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires for value of record the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. C. Instruments necessary to create the estate or interest to be properly executed, delivered and duly filed for record. 1 . Real Estate Excise Tax pursuant to the authority of RCW Chapter 82.45 and subsequent amendments thereto. As of the date herein, the tax rate for said property is .0153. 2. General taxes, as follows, together with interest, penalty and statutory foreclosure costs, if any, after delinquency: (1st half delinquent on May 1 ; 2nd half delinquent on November 1) TAX ACCOUNT NO. YEAR AMOUNT BILLED AMOUNT PAID PRINCIPAL BALANCE 092305-9080-03 1989 $1 ,344. 11 $672.06 $672.05 The levy code for the property herein described is 2100 for 1989. 3. Reservations contained in deed from the Northern Pacific Railroad Company to Alexander B. Stewart, dated March 29, 1905, recorded June 21 , 1905 under Recording No. 342731 , as follows: Reserving and excepting from said lands so much or such portions thereof as are or may be mineral lands or contain coal or iron, and also the use and the right and title to the use of such surface as may be necessary for mining operations , and the right of access to such reserved and excepted mineral lands, including lands containing coal or iron for the purpose of exploring, developing and working the same. PAGE 3 0797101 4. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: City of Renton PURPOSE: Constructing, repairing and maintaining roadway slopes and sidewalk areas, including a rockery AREA AFFECTED: The West 5 feet DATED: June 28, 1972 RECORDED: July 5, 1972 RECORDING NO. : 7207050453 5. DEED OF TRUST AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTOR: Laurence J. Ernest and Mary L. Ernest, husband and wife, and Beth C. Ernest, an unmarried person TRUSTEE: Safeco Title Insurance Company BENEFICIARY: People National Bank of Washington ADDRESS: 858 South Second Street Renton, WA 98055 ' ORIGINAL AMOUNT: $27,000.00 DATED: November 5, 1982 RECORDED: November 17, 1982 RECORDING NO. : 8211170165 6. DEED OF TRUST AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTOR: Laurence J. Ernest TRUSTEE: Transamerica Title Insurance Company BENEFICIARY: Mary Louise Ernest ADDRESS: 14600 S.E. 176th, #V5 Renton, WA 98058 ORIGINAL AMOUNT: In compliance with decree of dissolution DATED: July 19, 1989 RECORDED: September 12, 1989 RECORDING NO. : 8909120376 7. Right, title and interest of Beth C. Ernest as disclosed by instrument set forth in paragraph 5. 8. If all of the property is occupied by Elsie M. Seel and her spouse as a residence, all instruments conveying or encumbering said property must be executed by each spouse individually, or by an attorney-in-fact. NOTE 1: Assessed Valuation: Land $55,000.00 Improvements $50,300.00 NOTE 2: Property Address: 1132 Edmonds Ave. N.E. Renton, WA 98058 PAGE 4 0797101 END OF EXCEPTIONS INVESTIGATION SHOULD BE MADE TO DETERMINE IF THERE ARE ANY SERVICE, INSTALLATION, MAINTENANCE OR CONSTRUCTION CHARGES FOR SEWER, WATER OR ELECTRICITY. IN THE EVENT THIS TRANSACTION FAILS TO CLOSE, A CANCELLATION FEE WILL BE CHARGED FOR SERVICES RENDERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH OUR RATE SCHEDULE. ENCLOSURES: Sketch Paragraph CC/js 3/1 cc: SOUTHCENTER ESCROW 16400 SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY, #303 SEATTLE, WA 98188 ATTN: STEPHANI 1 cc: GEORGE XENOS 1616 156TH AVE. N.E. , #115 BELLEVUE, WA 98008 PAGE 5 0797101 Form Ko N•AK•55', (Prcv1oui Form No &OR - ORDER NO. 7c1 T 7( 4 ESCROW NO. _ LOAN NO. MORTGAGOR PLAT MAP Vol PG • ' �r E.vT.nI ' 9s - NE • 12TH ST (1zr�r AVE.,Y) 7 If-y . CoR4 ; tt/ �] /10 /0/3.03 i mot3l6• �7 90 r:cti-----7.----C=i". I 4otc0.17-�9 S88 sy 4s"6c 9 ^�n i h' p.lo^` / 1/? n a • • I °� ooz p a 8 . • a . i a l__kg�? Id' l340 ats • /335 9 90 • 1 La �,Ac. I 48 O. ,2V Z�4I.to v.. 13o.98 2 /• • vN J� Q' •• •n !p cr1,J`oC,, I�' �.ZI 42.79 I I o W--F 4. 1365 ��`� waiNs9 E. o• . •v 1 W "4•B . P oa tiZ 7*".22 > a D 3 9 N Q bi 4. TAQ �� =r� ,,,+'1 (2 6 G m 13 70 n tN 93-57.w �+ • / t4�°°� r nl /Si�7 ' • ��.J ,� /lc s h I. w 9 L] ..g. 0z MI V O ' 4/83-/7-30-K, t1J �+ 41 0 Q, O R n1• p s • • •� /J 7S i !4 14t•6,. -2 d• ILL'• 0 0 in Ai W i3 3° c �a /0 , J' 1 i 9.eb 2 if o - N 83 17- 30-r„ 73 r 6. • lam (42) it ; /3 d�Q . off+ /�3.07 It,e l E / /3zs I i sr Li E ^ ti �� ts,�3/3 A • Q lg.'Ae/v �� • aRP 17QS ( • ) =��''e S7 W O 0 •`, Q }� `` - f- Q,� , /.z4. es o /z 1I 39•5. Ts 'i ‹i Ty L/# rs •RO Isg3 `�}� „ 1/j?0 • • NC ii r C This map does not purport to show all highways , roads or easements affecting said property; no liability is assumed for variations in dimensions and locatiot C D u° 4__..kr 0661 0 � O Tiq 1 �ra 141 nicr-, I 1 i r 'I _On ;„z:j,,J,,-_ .•17-,_)_.4 IJ ( l�ir -l7 -y �v 7.` u n11. I may,} O;] O l� O 0 O O V _L'Ni„-0 , a, • •-,,, --0,C-o,. ,_.t-.,,,=,--- s.___-_ 1 .1](i!1 —�- 4 _ .0 nfl !!! I I ? I_; .-q-_7=4_-__--- • ' J '1A ti-e 80,,t, ...------7 • s ,v. gyros,^,g z .-}4 Clicat • �� <-4 . C—) r-- IF , 0 . _ _ Q, J .--7-'- r\ ‘,_r iLlir - . .1,- ,/,-, C. h fk -\ I L f�` r--•- C ) CD `1'C- 0 _y y inn yr� yNn l��.lf ' �� ,, �N� �. LET • : I • 4....:1 7 /2 --C -- __,' 71\x4 i JVam - - , f __ - 1TI. r 11 1 -T1 v NIT-e: V L Li UpJ IT 6 7 uotr .e ,_,,. „, ,,, Mr C/ _ oroirc .., , --1 , • ' I )17R- ,/,'• woe T r'. ' r— '12.FA. Agaisionem : 1 ,.....__.,, ,,---..---,Q- I---; CD CD 0 CliD R �r-T F it �rt e--- -� c- r x Jt 1 1t O _IL_' l:--J1._-y 1� y__yr=Y K_-'� 1 �: ( 1 • ; �' Old O_ ,______Le ,_.,_.. ri ,_,---„.... I o 0 0 -01 o "I' _, -- J 1 - IA. r / -1 --i • i \,,_ - . -.}-\/ ....,, { • - -I It= =._ o of Gb�vrsMoN oN • ATAR 2 3 1990 i . ) . 1 f3'1 I . r A DAYTON ,AVE NE-. • r it• /�� . / I i.- N DAYTON 'CT NE ®� .a R - • 1 .I .v:.. — •-AVE--NE r _ • i i i APT '.R_3 II , . - -_ _ . ,-„-. , •,:‘e......mi , imeg. . ... ED i ./ • , �' � AAPT �', \\�� - - , . . . . . . . ..,.. _ .. . . , .. _. • , -:,,,; • -.,,---:,-.-— ' 5—-._.! :-Q. :..._:\NSET Z, y GLEN - r ; • _ ' 4 , WOOD 1 -i' • AVE• NE f { f SCALE: :1"=200' :.__...• --4 R2 • 1 R_3` i •, \ , . _ .-. = , Balma Holmberg lnc. i R 1 • r-r— L N G I N $ '.$ R S •.dc S U R V E Y O..R 8 Y ..:HARRINGTON 'AVE NE l"'���Ir�"��, L�_��r7 "7:7��.�".���� �". .1606 ]t4. auwx BLVD.."aorrE - . . • • 7 QU1a. t WN 96027 (eoe).9oz - ozso . 0000 , /*N. NO.e-ao aoe AlE-D _l 010 :�»>:'�:�::�: :�>:»:z:::>:::::�>:>�::�>::::::�::>:DEPPRTMEN:T� :OF<�<C.O7+�I�NIt7N:I:T:Y:��:DEU LOP . .. ...... C R. FC • O :i:>:::::::::f:::::::::::>:<:::::::>:<:::;:>::>::::::: :> :;:::.. T : :.: ....:::::OF.:NOTIF.I.CATI:ON.::O:F.:P.RO:P.E.RTY.:OW.N,ERS::;..,,;:..:;.;;.;;:;.::,;.::::::.:::::: M° I >;>;;;:<.:.;:.: :.;:.;:<�;:.: ;:.;;:.;;;:;.;;;:.;<.:<w< thn::::3:.0..:0.>:;<f.e.e:t::::.of::;;:the::;:;sub:::�:e•c:t::: :s::it......................::.:::::::::::::::::::: ***FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY*** PROJECT TITLE: R or5i0J APPLICANT: 65,e CvCSC__ Kgy3OS APPLICATION NUMBER: R—p•34 —"Cs R The following is a list of property owners within 300 feet of the subject site. The ,Community Development Department will notify 00.0t“"“tth,es.e individuals of the proposed development. •7o°°:A ..° ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL csio ��cric ' �n/ 1 NUMBER 'cleb�c \./��0t. 1 r ', d en:. • NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER • • • • CERTIFICATION , I, G , r'Y '. hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property owners and their addresses were taken from the records of the King County , Assessor as prescribed by law. • A TEST: Subscribed and sworn to before. • - ,' , .., ,' me;-a:Notary Public, in and for the State of , \Vasl;ington residing at �t ID Go-uok _ ,r;on h 364- day of Ig90. ' Signed: CERTIFICATION FOR MAILING I, . . • ,'hereby certify that notices of the public meeting on the subject site plan approval were mailed-on • , to each listed adjacent property owner as prescribed by law. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing at on the day of Signed: Rev10/89 CERTNOT2.doc • • 0410 S. � erson, William P.O. Box 178221 San Diago, Ca. 92117 Wallace, Edward 1400 Florida St #9 Long Beach, Ca. 90802 Hutchinson, John 375 Union Ave SE SP 43 Renton, Wa. 98056 Tsang, Barney 1150 Sunset Blvd NE #228 Renton, Wa. 98056 Johnson, Joann 1150 Sunset Blvd NE #321 Renton, Wa. 98056 Patin, Donald 1150 Sunset Blvd NE # 322 Renton, Wa. 98056 Crollard, Kerey 1150 Sunset Blvd NE #323 Renton, Wa. 98056 Oehler, Susan 1150 Sunset Blvd NE #324 Renton, Wa. 98056 Mecham, R.W. 1150 Sunset Blvd NE #325 Renton, Wa. 98056 Martin, Steve 1150 Sunset Blvd NE #326 Renton, Wa. 98056 •4 Castro, Isabel rg, Barbara rson, William 1150 Sunset Blvd NE #202 Sunset Blvd NE Box 178221 Renton, Wa. 98056 Diego, Ca. 92117 Renton, Wa. 98056 Ghei,t, Tamara Chisarik, Neil ace, Edward 1150 Sunset Blvd NE #115 1150 Sunset Blvd NE #309 Florida St #9 v, Renton, Wa. 98056 Renton, Wa. 98056 , Beach, Ca. 90802 Bellinger, John Knok, Eugene hinson, John 1150 Sunset Blvd NE #116 1150 Sunset Blvd NE Union Ave SE SP 43 Renton, Wa. 98056 Renton, Wa. 98056 pn, Wa. 98056 Tarli, Theresa Lingat, Henry 7, Barney 1150 Sunset Blvd NE #209 2225 Daton NE Sunset Blvd NE #228 Renton, Wa. 98056 Renton, Wa. 98056 )n, Wa. 98056 % Young, Stepan Keefe, Thomas ion, Joann 1150 Sunset Blvd NE #210 123 3rd St S #220 Sunset Blvd NE #321 Renton, Wa. 96056 Seattle, Wa. 98104 )n, Wa. 98056 Plass, Henry Legg, Jene i, Donald 1175 Harrington P1 NE #31 1150 Sunset Blvd Sunset Blvd NE # 322 Renton, Wa. 98056 Renton, Wa. 98056 )n, Wa. 98056 Garman, Gregory Kiehl Lynn .ard, Kerey 1150 Sunset Blvd NE # 212 11209 Des Moines Mem Dr Sunset Blvd NE #323 Renton, Wa. 98056 Seattle, Wa. 98168 ,n, Wa. 98056 Zubrod, Jennifer Bergstrom, Melisa :r, Susan 1150 Sunset Blvd NE # 213 1150 Sunset Blvd NE #315 Sunset Blvd NE #324 Renton, Wa. 98056 Renton, Wa. 98056 ,n, Wa. 98056 Wester, David Wallace, Arnold m, R.W. 1150 Sunset Blvd NE # 214 1150 Sunset Blvd # 316 Sunset Blvd NE #325 Renton, Wa. 98056 Renton, Wa. 98056 n, Wa. 98056 Bauer, Kris Miller, Nancy n, Steve 1150 Sunset Blvd NE #215 1150 Sunset Blvd NE #122 Sunset Blvd NE #326 Renton, Wa. 98056 Renton, Wa. 98056 n, Wa. 98056 2201 Sunset Ave SW 12450 156th Ave SE Anderson, Frank Seattle, Wa. 9811" - Renton, Wa. 98056 1111 1150 Sunset Blvd NE Renton, Wa. 98056 Schneider, Daniel Minice, Richard 1150 Suset Blvd NE #101 1903 SW Hillcrest Rd Astron Dev. Group Renton, Wa. 98056 Seattle, Wa. 98166 305 108th Ave NE #100 �+ Bellevue, Wa. 98004 Sullivan, Michael Moosaviasl, Mir 1150 Sunset Blvd NE #102 1150 Sunset Blvd NE #125 Eslamieh, Ray Renton, Wa. 98056 'Renton. Wa. 98056 15343 SE 43rd P1 Bellevue, Wa. 98006 Purser, Wayne Lindstrom, Margaret 1150 Sunset Blvd NE #103 4636 176th SE Carroll, Diana Renton, Wa. 98056 Issaquah, Wa. 98027 1150 Sunset Blvd NE #3 Fassett, Valerie Croswell, Donald 1150 Sunset Blvd NE #104 1150 Sunset Blvd NE Scott, Clara Renton, Wa. 98056 Renton, Wa. 98056 1150 Sunset Blvd NE #= /2c2./zr,.-; GJA. 5 zasz, Sayre, John. Astron Dev. Group 1150 Sunset Blvd NE 4585 E. Hadtings St Renton Wa. 98056 Hull, Lloyd Burnaby B.C. V5C2K3 CA ' 1150 Sunset Blvd NE # Renton, Wa. 98056 Perry, Norman Gayle, M. Jr. 2308 SE 19th St 1150 Sunset Blvd NE #106 Renton, Wa. 98055 • Chai, Thomas Renton, Wa. 98056 1150 Sunset Blvd NE # Renton, Wa. 98056 Condo Hansen, Scott Sunset Heights 1150 Sunset Blvd NE #222 1900 116th Ave NE Renton, Wa. 98056 Brady, John Bellevue, Wa. 98004 23606 135th Ave SE Kent, Wa. 98042 Edward James Workman Kenneth '' Edward1150 'S Blvd NE'#1.08 1150 Sunset Blvd NE #223 Baldwin, Linda ; Renton, Wa. 98056 Renton, Wa. 98056 1150 Sunset Blvd NE Renton, Wa. 98056 Ball, MaryCampbell, Wayne 1150 Sunset Blvd NE #201 1150 Sunset Blvd NE #224 Bozanich, Richard Renton, Wa. 98056 Renton, Wa. 98056 1627 159th P1 NE Bellevue, Wa. 9800: Cole, Letty • 1013 Harrington , Castro, Isabel • Renton, Wa. 980 15343 SE 43rd P1 Bellevue, Wa. 98006 Salavea, Malu 1907 Harrington Ave NE Briggs, David Renton, Wa. 98056 8011 NW Greenbrier Dr Vancouver, Wa. 98665 Snider, Elebert Renton School Dist. #403 12210 SE 61st Snyder, Donna 435 Main Avenue S. Bellevue, Wa. 98006 1150 Sunset Blvd NE #127 Renton, Wa. 98055 Renton, Wa. 98056 Laitila, William Belmondo, Anna 5609 S Sheridan Walters, Georgia 1221 Edmonds Ave. NE Tacoma, Wa. 98408 1150 Sunset Blvd NE #205 Renton, Wa. 98055 Renton, Wa. 98056 Gustafson, R.D. Puget Power 9802 Rainier S Mackal, Charles 10608 NE 4th St. Seattle, Wa. 98118 1150 Sunset Blvd NE #206 Bellevue, Wa. 98004 Renton, Wa. 98056 Peterson, John Vuong, Binh 1007 N 36th Sapp, Odell '3402 171st Ave NE Renton, Wa. 98055 1150 Sunset Blvd NE #207 Bellevue, Wa. 98008 ,,, Renton, Wa. 98056 Pederson, Theodore Agabian, Nina 1140 Glennwood NE Daniels, Michael 2360 43rd E #307 Renton, Wa. 98055 1150 Sunset Blvd NE #208 Seattle, Wa. 98112 Renton, Wa. 98056 Sanford, J.A. Barker, Sharon 17740 SE 142nd Oldroyd, Jacqueline 1164 Camas Ave NE Renton, Wa. 98056 1150 Sunset Blvd NE #301 Renton, Wa. 98055 Renton, Wa. 98056 Hogan, Marie Goss, Ronald Walklpy, Fred 3611 I St NE #195 2720 SE 16th St 1150 Sunset Blvd NE #302 Auburn, Wa. 98002 Renton, Wa. 98056 Renton, Wa. 98056 Warren, Joseph Maletta, Donald 2335 NE 12th St 1509 N 24th St Laws, Robert Renton, Wa. 98056 Renton, Wa. 98056 1150 Sunset Blvd NE #303 Renton, Wa. 98056 Five Investors 912 12th Ave Seattle, Wa. 98122 Calvary Baptist Church • 1032 Edmonds Ave NE Renton, Wa. 98055 Karalus, Gregory Anderson, George 4111 0^110 Marine View Dr SW 27831 32nd P1 S Lumsden, Distributing LTD :tle, Wa. 98166 Auk�urn, Wa. 98002 353 West 7th Ave Vancouver, BC V5V1M2 Brown, Robert Walker, Albert 3515 E. Lake Sammamish 1150 Sunset Blvd NE #328 SGS Health Services Shore Ln SE Renton, Wa. 98056 1110 Edmonds Ave NE Issaquah, Wa. Renton, Wa. 98056 MainWaring, Paul Akesson, Kenneth 1150 Sunset Blvd NE #117 1060 Lynnwood Ave NE Mathieson, Florence Renton, Wa. 98056 Renton, Wa. 98056. p.•0. Box 2025 ' Renton, Wa. 98056 Denenholz, Julie Standard Fed S & L Assoc 1150 Sunset Blvd NE 481 N Frederick Ave Renton, Wa. 98056 Alexandersen, Erling Gaithersburg, Md. 20877 10637 22nd SW Seattle,Wa. 98146 Dorsey, Paulette Cry, George 843 Hundley Lane 3240 S 180th Edmonds, Wa. 98020 Seattle,Wa. 98188 Wooton, Kelly Dalpay, James 1150 Sunset Blvd NE #216 P.O. Box 2436 Renton, Wa. 98056 Sado, Masami Renton, Wa. 98056 1143 Harrington Ave NE Renton, Wa. 98056 Eng, Lorena Visser, Jan 1150 Sunset Blvd NE #217 1133 Glennwood Ave NE Renton, Wa. 98056 Pascoe E.K. Renton, Wa. 98056 2906 NE 5th P1 Renton, Wa. 98056 Ring, J.J. Morrow, Larry 2413 Medow Ave N 2814 165th P1 NE Renton, Wa. 98056 St Peter, Donald Bellevue, Wa. 98008 1135 Harrington Ave NE Renton, Wa. 98056 Eslamieh,' Ray . U Barker, Sharon 15343 SE 43rd P1 17440 SE 142nd Bellevue, Wa. 98006 De Maria, John Renton, Wa. 98056 1127 Harrington Ave NE Renton, Wa. 98056 Nass, Ivan Renton Housing Authority 960 Edmonds Ave NE 970 Harrington NE Renton, Wa. 98056 Gustafson, R.D. Renton, Wa. 98056 1019 Harrington Ave NE Renton, Wa. 98056 ;N e • . • , . . . .. , . . ....... ...,,,,....„?;,,.,........ ;.;:.1..;„. ....._.4.,,i,,..,/,‘...4:.4.,F,;...,....,,..,:.:„..:.•lid, , ;t::,isr.:1.1.1::::.:,.•,•••;,.; ,,,...1',.:,i,,,,,y,,,i: 4.•, . .,.... ,.':.,,, ,, •:.:r., ,;',..;.,,110‘,,,,}. ,1.. ....., ,i.:,...i..i.2,1,..,,,,•.';:',.:,',1';j!,,•P1,,•:•:•7.',:,::,.',I,:tip..0,...,i... ..,„,,,•r,•: •......,,.:,..,./.1-17,V•,r,$:,;_;.',I„A.':.,•..•,'+'4,...; IT;.,: .:.:••.,...,',...;,.•,,..L.-,.. ,.,1,.•-•,,,.: ,`,•,.!'. "1...“,•4t...I.:,.•.,,,,,...i•vs.,.?1;,..: , ;.••••.,•:•.,.:;z...,1,, ..,,,....._ .... ...... ,, •••,•..1-?.,.,,v,,.,..v,,,,...,,,;.;,,,•;,,,..,1 4,2.::,••,.1?,•,••;$4, , :..,,,-,...,,,,...-,,,.',....:,..,.).,Nr?..,,-,11:,•,3:-:,.•.••••••••'...r-•....?,',.:4:::•::".•••••.l',.•,:::',%•.•;1..,.: •..!!• ' •;.?./....••••'.:•'.•::.;:','•:'•.'''.•••`.:'11'....J../..i.,':••$'',•-•!:::,. .‘1'''''''',!:?'..1:':.,•',?..1-,,1.;,.. ••...j.?•;‘,..:4';''.' ..:;',:•:::.'(•,,4,./...f),..,......;`'i...„;,-44.:;,,.1,1?.:.,,,'...1.j/I': ,..1;;:.;:g;t1'4....,-;,•,:i.!..vitir,•11:•s1,,,:;,1!,?,;;;,. ..:.',..t,.,,'',`,.,.•!.11%.,.;1..i.,P..",.er.45)', ..!'(..!iiN;'.;:,,,:.p.t/41.od../,' ',','.;,:......,,..-...,...!--.::),,,:,......,::..... ,,,...i . ,....:,.,,'-' 1,q±.1-$4,,::.F.:,-.....•,::,•,44.,-.'..',... , i f',..:Y::'''''t 4.4'• •:......;';•••!i;:..;•••‘,'& .i4A;V•4`;...,...,,ti,',IVV,,V,...1'.4.....V,,.,,,',C?,..,Uftz:V.,,..i;.,'.:,,,',,,,,..t'4'4 •r.;,;‘,.':at''..0..;)',..P%;:-i'S.1'.04.k.2...ljtili,,q,',4 A' ',, t.,,„ .,,4'.0,.•'.<tt 4.ej•.}....,.7-..'•.1'..t.,';',',..,...• ... ',,:%.',"2.,,.,.',:‘,.?..‘•,, 142¢...,;1..,:s.,,...,';'....e....4..:,ic.1:,'.1. 1.,;? 1..:6?,,.i..,4•::'':.',.....,Y,;.1..:r,:''.1::::i"..i'.1, .4,1t•,j....:A'l''.‘.•''NiVir.r,.;qAtA.4%....c:',Tiftfr';.:1•.':,.g.1.14i,Ilt'I,••:',::•••i,V.N.. ..'•:;..14•.'4St'•'4erci.''',T*4'': ,60,•:0-t . ,,,,,,,,..1......,-...-::. :::.,..,.....,- ?...,??,:....,....,. .,:.....i.i.liii, ,-.,,,,•:.,.........;.,N•A!,,,..-;::::...i,,,i., ..,;::,. .:: :, ...,i2.,.,:),-1.,:....r:•.,•:. ..,.., fr,••:.,:ii.,7.yi.v.....,..,-;•:iF:f.,.:;,.,.::..L,,...t,,:.1.,,,,Y,,,,,,,,x ,.....,.:•.,... ,...,:,..4,.,,i,,,:,,..,,,....,!!,:,,...,..::.:.,;.,:.:4::,;,,,tt.v,,,o,,,,..:1.-......-..;.,,,,,,,z....;,...,.,•-•,,,:;.,.:....-y-:: ):,.,.........:„,:...,. ,,,,,,.,...,..,.,,...,..,,,.::„..:,...; ...0:V.,'..';:i..\:-•,.::'.••'........”:::.•:'....;a:‘ .4.1N11.14,..r...;'; .2"• •' -. •''.- '- 1..i;:•,::...,?;.1..f. •f...i/A51...:....,,,,,1/.. ,,•.j..4, .1.1.,...!,`.1i1,:':•;',..'. ..,,'.1''/M,... 4.14P.•`'.....4,1....,..1%).:.:,...,*.•:'•:..„:1 7r,;.c ...3.•.,?..:.:.:-..i..:' .2'.4.'...':',:;•`.•:..:-....',,,. ...;.'".;:A•.1:5'..'4.`,..:.'-1,).':;t; 1 (.. !„..,..;4,,.„.:.:F;:,....c,:.,...15,11..,Y... , „....,,,,Writri..y,.4.::...4,•,;::!:., '0.A.,..c.-...;'..r.,-.........,:,.....:::•...,,.........s... .!.„.••„,, •Y,i...1. ..„•=t.,.: .,..", i....,..,....i:.-A.•'•••.,.;••• • #25.-. ........,,i-,,:.,:.:••. ,,...,'.f,,...,:i oft.,,, :.:,••••.•- ..• • '.••.`..:i... 4,..,...':,•;...L.,,/,,•......,0.4,..Y....',...q,,1.4-i..,' ,..7.-•.•.'..!'.....:1•-•.•.,.. . ''. .'..''"....'vt.ro,..... :::.'...‘,..,:,,..., '...-•',::...V.,';:. :::::Flt. ?,..-i',''...,.'...'.....‘,....;-i.•r. „p,, ,..... ,..,,i-..,,p.-,, ,•1:,...,,,,i...,.'.?...0., . “••••.I .- . (;!...I.)..1.1.,"?;4'.'0.:'i/.1..; ',‘,1:.1....10 AsYq,..4....4..::...::.:. ,...1,,'.;:•:•:.„.; . ,.......A.;''.',..Vg.4.' ii•••:".1.; •"...'•Y......:` :,i'•'...,,.''j,,..•'..f..,41 .`;, .•V'..',i-ii.4,V;'.::.'',: '',...t i.':.'1'••:,';....,..Yi...;'..1...'Yf'.! :'•!4;:.':i.`..''..!,:'•;I,!`);",::''',',..V: • • ... f'•..‘ •i!'..,) ••--, •',. :, .....,•. ..:':'''..' ' ..:1''''';'0.... :':t:•:.: •.1'‘,..;.•''. ''..1..`•:i:•;• •'...,••1 :::::.-,....:::::==?-::::::::::=1:-...: DUPLICATE RECEIPT DUPLICATE RECEIPI__ 1...•••••••.,:”..-. ••ro....„!"(,., . , . , • :.c,t..... ,,,,„•:. • ,.. tV)....:.'.., `..1 ,-;',V....,.,!•.1 f.q,1•,.',si.t.,..',.`..'',.'...'.. :•-1'..-;i::'`'''.-,41.).''i'`.''...:,'• '•:' .' ;.:•:::.,:::::',..,:,.•:,.....i1',...:.t.41:1.k..1..."r....'...,.:,.....,:-:,.i.....:','‘:::i:1-:::::;,',-i;;.:„...,..,:;:-'i..11;',.,::,;:•i:•••.:.,;:.;.::::.--4:';'..;i. ' CITY OF RENTON I..,•;;:q-1,.,.-il,...?..',,k,',1,4,c;g;.(••,3;;L:1•:;•:.:0;:;f1•••:;:f..,•::•,••,1:•.,r4.•,-.,•.;,...;•• .:...-...,. ..,•-• : •••••••••••,-:4,,,,••••;:.p.....v,..,f,.„.•,,,,,,,f,•••:.••";•:'1,',...,,,Y:,,,'",!,..''',,,1 ';.•. •:.':4':• .•'I•• .... ::•,r.:„..,,.Y.,,,,,i'S,V•i..,.,?,..;I'' ••••r`•:'f.4.4:•,.-., ......!:•%4•:r.'''''?''‘., C I I Y TREASURER ......,4:-,114,,:;,,..:;,-,!.,••„i••:,,,,,,y•4$•••,.‘,•••••,•1•••.,•,•1,.•••••,/:'•T••••,•:,•),,••;,,,,if••••:••••..'',' •••': . • ,'•';<,•-•''..•••';:;:l.K4C:'''...;:•".:'i.;,''',..:•,,•'--..i:,...,•'1,•;'..."',",.I' • " •,•;,•:••,..,,. ,.....,,,..m.•••••1•••:',,,,,'••;tf,1.,:.•Ac.•,;••:..;(1:;.;::...,:';.•;,:',;•••wfigli•';•,••••,••:,::•-1,-..:••• ;. •. 'f•!';'•;•••: .•.is..'‘;'1••,),;;FII.',.;J.,:,•.:'..,,-,',1?:.,•, l'.•*.s.„4,;;;;:;:!..'.';1.,',F,...i • .,.,.....,,.:••••,:.:,:•;:)i:Ai.,.;,,,N.v.:;;;•,•:;;:...,•••,(ii..?...! t'..,",, )• ''... , '.•••,`.• - .i••.?;-,.:••':,;.L..,,.'.,.,.•.•"',',.',1.,,::•1,•, t.,•,-,,,..;•,',,k.k,. .....'.„.,'.".-..,•,:.';....;.:&1t,4,I.,r,i';•,':,...•k%.::-,:::,;:::,e.f.;!.•E.•-l:,"i:•••.-•i••r.f.1 0. 11-14-1989 2:26 a 1 m • iry:!-.....,,,oz 1.e.4.A•••-0,.•.),,:,.......;k,:-::;.,.,.p0i3O;',-,,;;?..--`-:'i..t,5„.),;,',,.\.??;.,..,,.,,A'0,,•i•4,:.•..p...:.,.:..;ro•,..f:g.ty%:,,.1;:i,'.,;•,,,..!•T:•..,::••;;.•4•••,•,•,,.T...,,:,7 4•:0:!00•1)1‘•.:.1..,,S,,"7'•'•'•,•,;,,.•'...••:;.;,•...:,•,i•:-•i••...-.'-,,•'.'....,,1•,•,‘•••. • ,•.;•-•.,7,-;. . .,, •‘•..,,,,•....q.k,s,..,,,,,,,,,,4..:ri'.).:'*'",!,:::.':''''.'''.......'.".'.''.;4:il1y";i'1'4'''1...:'.'.':....f.'‘•..'.;..*...',14%.`'..I*•....*:i,P''''....'''....;.'1'..'."*I•:'''''...'''....'::":1! RFG/H RICEPR T 1)2- 2981 === AMOUNT .J`51•..;i.:;,-,t-?-;:ij•1",:'•.,71,t,.'°.,,","•i•i.•:!•:,,;?.•".t'„,.i.,1;‘•?,4.,1..,..S.`.1.,,.',.%•,.,•1-,.•;,•.••,..,,,,,.P.e,,.,..",;1.„....r..,.1..,...:t,.4,,...-..•.;..;',•1',.ik-';•,•,,',":',•,. ii:•;;;:,•'•'....,•-,:::...: •,• - -,,,,,, ••••, '.....',,Ifj,',::',,,:c.2`.".'. ,. •c...,'...'••;P.2:4",;''.'::"Z...1,.. , $640.00. :.....viic.,....„...,,,!,.,,,,,,.....„,,,,,,,.....,.:,k,..r.4.f,.::.1..1,...,,7 r..):. . r'0.••.:`,•'. ..',• •` •' • v"....,;•,,,,,.:ii.tvt.r,-..... i,•.-;.C.,..,...,!,14.1.,4...).:•,,,,,4?:Ift.fit,.,•.'"..c.::;."..t.,14:4,7,!,..t,d,.;'.i.;,,•.':,4•!•::f., ,. 7.,•A.),,,..).,,,...•.1..-:,.,.. :., ..;,.. • • .ti;:ii•',',1 •r,:•'1'''' •'...I.,,'•''.1.1'...,?4,:;,...t.!' ,','''.:):'.•• -4 :'''. • '.;''''...;.;•:.:;'.'''''':i‘.....1...II''',„_?I'.!itf 7,•.';'..'..1!...'•:..'•''.''....',)'‘‘,:,.....,Vir;...:';:r.:•!:•'•'..)..1,?,.;.,'\! 71).57 UNKNOWN ACCOUNT ''‘.-: ":.''.'''.."'''V'r,-,''''..es:-";•I ''•••••',i, r•''.:•::,,,,•,f,•••••; •• ;;;',••••-••• REZONE • •. 999.999.99.999.99.99.999999,..., • .•:;‘,.3„.0,z,r;••,..i•,• ,,.....r,-, ..?..••••,,-,:; :••••.;•.i., $80.00 ,%.,•••I.•:••••,••::::1.,,,1.1 OA'i,/le.1.0.:'..'t.•:'•'1...,r""t, '':..•, '• ...., •r'.•. .4 ...ti...14.1/.1i s'il3,-V•i4.1...!.TJ,i'ler.‘:'..:7,,t,?•;SZile..,'- , •.. . • :- ...“...;• ''''''''''I 7057 UNKNOWN ACCOUNT . •,,1„••.. _,....••:•-,•,....1..",••,•••:..•••;.;•.•.•; ••••••.;,,,•::, •:••••••,:-,.. !,,,•_•,i,...:i14.2.F.:A,A.,.V.•'::::,,',41',3Q,:;!i•.,:•,..,/,,,,>,..1.•,,,"•..1,r.,i;•'' 4 i:,,,•.`,,,. ', • ••,.• • • "i•-•' :',,'•,•1,‘:•"•',,,:•••...,'',.. ••".-4.f i •• '''•••'‘''';•. '..'•'''"'''' ENV IRON REVIEW . ':•.i'•,•4i.,,,-,,,,.v,...„!1••,•.,‘,.,•.••••••,•,4(01,st,•;•;.;,•,r.e:.•••3....,;'.:.••:,,.:,;••„IA.2,,.:::.. .•. ,•:' , ' i.......•''':•. 4-1t„`„,,,..1)C.,,,,,.'• •'.,:44.,''...::.'.i•:'••••••• •"ii":.'',' 1;,'(..I;;;;4`,.,i:•',1-..,,..t".f.i:ii',Ii;%,",I,j, ...',Vil.T4fi'•1,(..-',:1•..:`.1,i.!.,n,./.,0,i".I...1.,:strAW, ''''..'''''''''1.•':"E.44‘1''''.‘••••.'-'1".•-•:'.',..;‘;:%,11;•,;•••i'i's.•'.,••.4%'•.• 999.999.99.999.99.99.999999 . _ __• $10.1-10 - r..;:!,i,:x.,:;,,;713,,,•';',,.0.•;•?„7,•o ),14.4.,..;• -4,:,-,••1.,•.;',1.4;,4‹ •!.:,,,,....',.........„,..:-.,.• . ,';''.6'.....i-,....'....-.'...4v`..;),.44'.!.1'::';.c•-•,?,..;,1,...',..'•:c"?vi,-.,:,.=:•*'_.',1:;,'', 7009 DIIPLICA'TING SERV IC ,•,..i.• .. .,,•.,„•••;•i•:‘.i,,"..:-,V,ity.:tk:4'•*.i..)q.f,1•••?:,,'."'S'..'t'i.;1••.',,l• l',,:,,r."•'•• ';',:::.: •••.• r••,'1..••••••••••,‘, ,1\',4,:-VA r.".,,,,,-.:1.:,,,-,..t..,!:.-;!;,./.,"•'.....', .:',..,.1 '1•411,11;?•-•'.'1••,' ,..'51';;,(4'!•';!i.:-,tr••••;:!•••4`4'"1,;..1'.;,'!‘it,"I''.;-,i•,.1 1•:,•:.•!••••`.. .-. '• . iii4.1:;•••3;.':,,./Tit,.. .!,..4:ii.k.its:IN2T,`4,1`.4r:.•;!";;'1',..-:!•:,5,...,.•;4.•!,r.;-......-..-.....,....,• . .. ,r51::,..,",.:,,,•;,•.'....::',,,',"'4i.:',,•0,4,1,r11,4,• !....,••• ;:"..:,,..,..•,.;,,..,r . T ...•,;,:,•;.;•;',....?,i..i.i.j lc:101111;i V I 1U31[_111.)T.IY31.3 F.'R304.Fi I.61..1E3. 1D-JSC.:13130024 - • _ $u.81• •,•••••:•••••,,,,;!i4:?.,,. •••:;!...„!,•`.4.e.:-•.y,:•:?.V,-Azi.•:,...,•:,,....',,,,:,•;;;'....;".•;:iSsi;i•E•••••••..,••. • ....•-.• •- . - 1;:g"..;;••,:-.",,,1.1•••••,•'...i:a..'1,.4•••e•-,•••••;7••••-,,•':;•?..,1•.'.':',‘:••,4,,,? •,'*-:•••••••" ‘".•'- •• - ;;••1:•;•;•':•-:7'••,•:‘:1••%•,t,i7,,'"'',i••••-;:51.:,":•:--c;,•:••Cip••••••••••,'...;••••r...1 ......... firm fin •-).31„71-3,.0 r_Ls_w_n_u_i uu '''.........'':-..':‘.1:';''':''''1;1::41''''''''.i:;2:;''..::''''''':::;;•'•;''''''.1:0;'''''''''')/s...A';'-'1'..:rf-,'':; 9-9-9-8. AC(RUED. TAXES . _ . ,-••,• -,,,,,,,,,,_,•••••;•.••,t,.•••.:.?:•:•••,••:_i••,-,.,,••••,•.•y, k•,., .1,......;:..,i 1r irer.---.--•.-, ;'..i;e.(e4i3i:'!,1,11'41;:i ir;i:Yrt,f,:li.-L;(1,..... ,1'•ti.. .!.e,''::':'::•,)7.:11Psr:, ....%!%':',:',:1-:-;''''''-r- ''':. .... • ',-:1•...;''''..',......W.'::;4•1. 'e•-::•;'..I., .....,:••4 i':II,':,,',.,,c.`.i ,•,!.., : ...",1YR,I.S..V.?.!A.t41.,:b..-ii.P...t.?",K,..1'1',.,.It.I.I•I;l'' ",4‘k4••••),IYllf,g....'':'". •*. • :... : :••fi'i.:;1;:,..3'.:•i's,,.',vpi..!-T.'...'..0.''';s:..''..'. ii...,q.,.'..3'.11.i,t...1 TOTAL DUE $730.81 .. •,.i,•,,-.•,•.:•.,',,:.,,..!.rt,s,,','•!• 1•••,.%,1',,,•••'••••!,,i 'L. P.:;:•:i.,;.:''.';f,;%;:;i't;'ii;"(f,•;,.:::1, . '•.•..... ' ...,..• 1,:,..,.;.•.' • •,,,•!,;.•,.:• ',.....,;;,:,',,,4!,..,.•,:•••,...i,•,.;••0 '.1•' '.'. •ii..1!•••••"'s:'.....";'''..'•''. .`:''','.••'.•'r'•••••''t' RECEIVED I'R011: .•,.!'il.,.•..41',.•,:.•••;•,,:if,:re•';',:. ..04:•:4-':,-.4';''''••;‘•:,•44. t.: ''''',...r.;'4•1•1:!'.'-'''i!"':'': ' --;-- 2.. .. ••,..• „;•....,...1 ,:lc. ••,,• ••• .,;.,....,;• :,..,••••;.-,.••• ••••••••• ,:,,,,,• •1;,•44••:::‘,,•••••••••••,••••••••,=,4:••.,:,.• ,••••••,•••••,-;.,•.-••• •• •" - -,. - • i.••,,• • ...,••••;1•61.,,•.:, •..,••••,•,,.7•••••,,•.••:; •0•,,••••••:-.,•-••,,P.-t- I1ICl1AF1.. & 11ARSliA RODGERS ,,...c-:•:,•:::.1:,,,,•„,.•,,f••,-.s•,, ,,,,;:,,„17,:„..,./:,:••••••.:.••,,....••,..1,,,IV.•. .:•••. •.• •,• ..!f... '.;:;.,.,..i-.41.-;tg,':::::...:i li::':.' '..6,,;:i:,,`•; . :.'..:,(,,,..... :;-...;'','..1'.....e.''..'0,'P',•,•-!....',,'•%,' ,, !"......i.,.,,';...'•. ..3:•;%,,,•,.);',.......', ,.. . . •' •'. ... ':.hl,,:•:,,,,...„ '. . .•z.:•,'•,,").•,!..,,...y,: •,:."-,. •• $730.81 414k'f.,P•••:',',:..i.t1.'S•.,;;1...j,c).' ,;',.;41;.-,-1*,..:t:".•.'‘',.',-;••,),.:1,;(1?••-'1;'A'!!,,,•i,•. ..,:..•••, . f••••••if',;:.,p.:•, !•,:.;•-4';;.:•-.;' ••••:A.1"',., ' . -',1,-.....!...•;.s,;?':'41."44',':•;-;;',... ••••••••;' * •• -i''''.. .-....;,•';'11.1!'kY;:l..'•-•!....:•."'...',;:1;.:.1•••: .;..;,'•-•,•••:.!1,.;‘,'.ii,..;•...,1;'::„.•::-.1.-I CH F._CK $730.81 i:'114,'f`-••••• •4••• ;•'3‘,1••-ii.1.)-•,:••':.4::-..;•`;;;;,;5•;'(;-.•;,','!,'.1t,...$•';;).5:;'..;•::::•::::-..i.,...,.:}•••••;''''-', •• ,:,• •.•i••••••11-ke i.• ••-:A....•,,,,.,••••5:4,-•i,...z••z •„.. •TOTAI_ TENDERED ,:i-,It•V•'•":1'•'.v.•••-V••••:;n.,„•,:,,.'••;,• ;• .•::•:••••:•:••r••••.44....,•-•.-.: •.,-;.••.;,:J.. • .?••••; ,,,;4,,1:11•,%,...•,'••••• •n','•;,•!.:.-•••••11:c..0'."-•-"i.-f::.. '. •, .,.1.1-1:: 1,'!).7%...y;%•.•',..,'".4-1./',...;•;•,1.1'•i....• ',..,..'..,'..!:,k,„f„';,'•'.. ..:..... ' . . .:.F.•'., •'::.:'.A.",;;Y:..+‘....••'......!ji''.•-' .•:-.e.';''.‘:...'s• ...:::`0..;;7. $CI.0 0 1,,...,.....,.;:' .•1..V.`•!:.,....V;:'1...":t•r.,,.•;l','..•••,:.' ,,,'"t',4'''.1.:•• -'. • ,'.:'4,i!.;,•j•,;' .,•"; • ,•,.•.i..•:"....-;:,•••V.....',.,.....*.,'',... CI IANGE DUE • , ,.•••,-i.,* : • • ,....:•••c•,...•• •••••• .•.:•• ..,••:,• .....: ,•.,: '.,:•.,,,,••,,,,•..,.:.,, • • •,.•-•,•;,..,;,:,•:••,„,„•,•,., in,' .;:. P,•.;..'',1k., at•• •.... . . •. . .. ,.,;',... .:.41'.l'.... .;'•l' ':...0f V'1,',1k,',..,.....!:',...!;'.J 1.1.1 ',•:',1:,': -*.ri.•b 7,- . •%.',.•:. • •:',... ••;‘,.',..4:14.:'4,,;•74t.'.",'.'.1):;?'. 1 ':'I' i'l'l -• -- ''..1•••'1.14•:Ir'..11I.,k1/ '(!;•';',1?/;.Tf. :iI.l:•::.'•;•:'',.4';;f:2'.:7;P,,i'llili;tft?4 , ....14.• .•, . : 11 ',I..1•iV.'.•,4 t•.2.17.:I...I..1.;••.4k li,i I'%•,..••':•':•'1,4°,1'4•'•'1.-,,,..ig,`..1 1:". • . ,.•...•,' ' .'....1. '••'. ,i''',1;;:t,:.% ‘...•'•III:1,',•;•;:,,•,1.,.....4i,.,; j.,.i.,-,..,. . P!:.,),,,C;lit'ir:i"‘1,:.t4.1.'Ag4.,ii'l.,°:::1''...;t..r",:)S,'.'!,'t..../...9.,,,...??!,&f.e'Lti'');':'?',•;::•:::: ....•::"..•'• 1,:,'' ••IP.',.4,5,(44.,,,"ti: 'o. ,,,.....:,.., *I:. -...:.. I.)UPLICATE RE-C:E IP1' DUPLICATE•RECEIF'T 'r"1:;';',. ..v...k•I',e.'..:75.1('N:l..i,13',;r'r":...q,,,...111'''':?;re' r.,...•..•..;''';. s' ' .:; ',•'•:.4%i•F,)h.•• ..1'..•,-•!';.;• '..',1...?..f.4.1%.,‘6'4,4.),‘,•,. . ,...1.'• ••,I',:f..': 1-1.."i.'•• :)•::..:.''.''.'i';'•-.4'.;' ''... • •44:,• ...,.,.f.4.0•:••.. ;....2.,,,,e,,..J.; ..:,,.,...:,,,s,. 4:.4,3;•.i,A•ct.„,,....:.,... •.. .,-..., •. !...e1A.1,..;..,....,..„5'.'/.....Y t-..-Alp,p.,,,..••••.,......!,.•,..•,..r-..,T,4-t..,,,, .. • ... ., ;,... ‘1'.,)4.1......,'H , . .."',4.,:• 1.4...,.....,,,-•:, : . . . 1,,g..,:•ei'.1.1:10.i.•.....,,r.F.L',4‘: 4;?•• ,' '.!;i:•'•'. '...'..,•".11,,,!•tirr,..."':'•.:'•!:..,..:-.: :.-. '4'.••• ..,,..0 1: v.7.:.:.•4,,,,,:.-:•,,,i.';...•,J,W I.:.-4, . Lt,I.el .. ..' 4"'''?..t.14...'.:..1'.or,3::•:'....:11. .4,....!.:' e,,.•':.;'. '.;:,.:'',... . , ' ''..'r,t1,\-41 ';'!'11?..'',,,•%.,:.1,1::.;'-i:V,:..!....''r 4.'-.C;•,.. . .... ..,;,,' ..,4.‘1%'.',.o'..:;.•,/l t.., ,-•,. 4,.,,,,. , ,..,C,,. .„,., 0.• .,. ,. . . . I i.:r .. '::. i,‘ r., :•,.'',:::!1.1„1.ti.'.;,..; .••••,'••••••••'.:- . rk..y.r:.•,'f.!,4',,...,,,, ..!,',.'"..',••,g•;-7.•'').•,,,...;'•°:••,,',,••',t-4,,p4 ',/-,;-;.: '. i;'•'.' - "'I....,"'',.A:,..';.,Wisi'..V'',:i"....:•'....:.;'.;':..i':',,-;.."•......3-4.:'..i.„' .1c'.',7•••,7,i.':•• • • . ,,,,....,,,trr; ,.....,i,,,,1•.!..,.(,:,:• ';/,?,!('''.,•':,',••••.1 i-_,"....i'4'6 .'•:.:•,.'.',.''.1.•; :.,•:.•;.'...-'s-'C'i'''..P •'•',••'"• ''. ••• .. • ' ....,.,• ..:•,.•....:.;.,;:fi,,,:tt.-,....;•,;;;',.,..,••:::',;•ii'...';(••,.'.`..';',":1 •.',',.:••','-',..•.,!".•."1,1i..7.,••••..,-,,,,,,,,•,.....,•;. 4. .,oliv1.11,P,.`,•,V):e:.".;;'"iltrt.ii.r:,;1;:ll•ii,!i•k31;>.•:,,,IS,- '•;*••fe'0.1:••••••••••••:'1!,•••',"::,':....."-.:.:.•‘.VC;4•.,:fi;•!....11":„IiII,':,''d:'./,'1.4';•;'...i..-71:;;,1*,..,4•(•,?.',.!,;'• ,-:.• '.. , •r.•••••••••:.'!I,, ...".•••••::"'s/,•:.'•'.:!I,••I ..-I.4.6.•';'••.1,,:9"..,.1:..,‘Fis•ritilf..,,!1,4,4%..i.?.,!,6:::,v,,,_k•44..4 A J v.'I,!.y.,/,..,..70:ecs.,.,...:A......i7:,r;...1.,,y,t;.?...1.;•,f i',I... t,':•:,...C.•.,:it,:,1:-.:,...r..• :.•„ . - ::,..... .?Ii74,t,t.t..'.'4;•.....i.r.';.1,..,•!...,:.:;....;•••'. ..!Ilh,i'.4'''.,•,•,•',...It,•t'o•.:,i•'..-,'.,z..',1 .r'.„...',.' 1' '..,),;,91.:•,c1,,i4,,vtl'e...,;,.-',C,..2.0."gcb,_•'•./•,,,,../.,1,;.,,,i' „Vi ,.f''f..c.'..-'.,,',1-,k;•?.:,r.'10,;,,,,....::i 4',.....1)e,„t:',3,ffri;..,,,L.•',.:.'‘CI;At '• ....,,,,,, • , . ..,, , }',,t;•'....i'....3•,it,e,,f frjr;Ai'.'::"..1i25.:„1,,i.1.:;%,..1,1'.(1,':*;•.'...;...,•1•;.C.':•,';,V;‘,4..1.,,..''?;..',,•1•(i'• . , ...ali;S;;;i9i4i.j.,4,',,i.i,a 4k1.1:1,,ii:tip*V;;;Silik;11A j,,,'t; •lig..!-,',..,.,,,.&i.44v.,•i3?1,;-y5:t•i.i':1`,.4.•.:4;:i'z'fIL;;.'tx:sni•ii.••!,;?•,...•l'i'%'.:*,•,%•-•i„., -,.:.•,f•.. •.. :',;.-.'• i,:,:',.'ii.',,,4';,..,•to,%••:•}V,;,,,,. .,1,-?A+,4,;72„1,: fiti..''.,,-,.'..i•t-...Y.,,;'.!..1;.:2!,!•(,:!!.:1,1.1,....,..?';:.:••• ;,, 1.p.p.::,i... .,',,i't.nnt...p‘z,41;;;;r:i..,,,..7,0t,i,....,,.isit,,-.N•kt.,;•,,,e,•,,ifri;.:.,....!:),r,,•/.0,.;:i;:<.,:...1.9.2,..:.,...t.......yvt4s.s--F,..!:...v,<.i.:".r.,?:':.,.. 4.-...k..-Als,','.,.:.••,:-...',:. •'.: -•.; „..--,•[....,.......„,:.•.‘,A444.,;,:,:i.,....:-.•:-.,,,,,.:,.....„....,.,7;! ..it•:.,..;,..,..--.1. ,„,...:••;.:•:,..i).:.-...i...? :;,.. , i.......-ats,..;:,...,..11:1-,.2..„:;,.'4:11., -.3...1t.i.,,:;:.0.122.,,,i,..rig,:;..,„. .,;4..tiy.,,,0J,:.,..v .,!..,t,..;,..i4.e,..).1,-..t.J•gi. .r....,..,::i..,-,...„.:1,v6,1.4,,,,,it;f:.-..-- •,•-..,,,...,•;',:.....•-- ..„...,..„.., •.:, ,,,,...,,.. .,....„.. ...,:...„......,,::..,..,....,,....,,,...,....r....... .i„.4. .,,„., 1,,;‘•.,•,,,,,r-1,-1 .P.,,',:,ii : •:11,''..-,,,,k•ii .• '- .s.1.......-+6-3..1.••'4 l•••.t ",.r.te iY'.13-4;,•,1?•;',•'r....-.:",. ;.•'..i JcP r `'.-1. •••'''' • ' • - •..",,.I"'...•:•,..• . 144:.-e';',,-471,1,7•-•-,•••••.; .:'',:":"...:•,.,1•••?z,' '?;'•';.'•••'..+•,-`0•7,...';'..:••••''••;>';:i.) ','..i.44,.;,',.•:r.".;,.;016,:co.'::,','":4'.(tir:k.i...4:44;7::‘44::,,g,imit;7:1;.$(..,...t....1.*,,,,'4:1:.?;,!..4;0,..-x-sy...,.;:t,,,,,,'..,,,,,,I,...,;.,A,0,..P.,,,..,,,,,...,7414,7. ,,,;,.,:: ..„.:.......... - A.,:j.i.„,',,•;•,•,'•...:::,;,..,),. t',,.„?ire,;,;,..:,.'j..;•.",..6•.t.,..,..2... .11,l'irk.;`,,',,...ii/.;•`;‘;',.'....Y.,.....'•;'•.'7::e'14T:. .2.;,"ti? , • :t,':i.':;.••.'".',r•,.....'.1-p.A4,•••4;,ir.:411,rei,-;)?,-4`,;;/81,1,.:el.fil,••7 •••iv....t2;,1 ii.'11,•.'.:•';'...!,;1,,,:!..,tiert.';Vp„'.X.•,7,„g...i. ,!•;,,-!;.3 ,;:.•;;;,.....,,,,c.,04,%,4.,-.„..;.,;..,'., ,,,......• .' t i '-'•};••••;.-...r!::.;::2;;•-.4 4;x1.e,•`!'.....,?,'•'Y''!.., !..,:.•..f.itd:0,::"..'.:,11;1••;,:•:.:•:••••;`,":'.,:.rc.;1:.;`...•;',..,, , ,!,....yi,t,....,''''"';:,111•4;;-4::',,..i..;i:, ;(:t?,frlit.r.',',..")?1A4 r....p 1:411it 44::::.•.1..;+ .f,;,:).,:,14...t.:••,-,c,;'...,s.p;g:‘,..4,..:if•:::•,:.•?,..i!,1,1.,....;..;;1...,,,,4,:ip.;, ,..,.-;.... •.:.......; ,,,,,:';;........6',.-,,e4..:,.1.,:,.ff;:•:1,..k,,,,,...,•:::,,....z.f.t!..v...;:,.!... :3,t,...t.,::...:..'...1.:,-',.:}.,.',;.,,'.,.',.:;.... „.,....i1/0),,,.:;ti.;,.,.;.!...„:::....,,,,--?":1!:,...4...;•;4::::.-;!.4..!...-...iiT.,.,:"...,i'i'.!...i: i.:::',::!'i'.....,•A. .i fl:;!k%4,.Yi,.."•,•4,•%:...,:1;1!.;c1..,.., 1;:••',',,,..ilic.rit,.•%.''t; ','•.:'.'.•.-•;• ...i.i,..12...,..,,..;.i.,,.,,,,. .,),.. 3:e,.,„.,..,tt.,,t.,,,:..,:.:,.,•,,...„;....„,•,,,,,..,,„.....r?„.,,,./,,..., ,..:. , . 4,c..3.„1,'i.,...,'Itt,',$:./..i...,..-.,;17..qa*,,t r,.y.,+xl..,,r;•,-,,5,-,.,...,.,es., -, 1,.:,,c....•.t-'„,••"-:.-.•;"•,.%,1.,p-.1••1...•.,...,..,,,,.,...', .e.1 -.... .i.,.,...:,,,,,I.,•,.i.,,• . :..,..• '''..!''...*.***-*"14.'!;1...;.;.!,„...;.1...'.;',.1.1.:.,1,..•••••:::,..:1. .:`,:-. •',',e..,-;f„'f., :.'i-.;,':•;?...:'..-''.',..!" A .';:,...:::"t•''.'..%`'SfiL;l111.,....-.4,-:,•Y,Fiii,.:i.',•••.'iV,'14`*.r.,?.:1..,..,r,,.4.;;•,',0:•:,•':',./vi..,•,:?•;•.'•,i...„.4!...N...,;;,,,,;;;. ..-••iziot:.:•,....„:,'•:•.,,..--g:.::•.,:.::•:"..c.i.:2P:,1:,.:-• '.':: . •• . .',,.;.,:,•,;.:...•:,,....:::::••,;;;-...;%.t.4:......ii,;.-,._•:,..,.?;.........;,;..i.:...,.:::.c.::).;•:....,;.:,i,...:d.. ..:.,...'...?...t,....:.:54..-.:. ,;.,,...:,-,',).::i...,•.•,,,•.....,.-z:......'.,•.,f......,'..i..:;..416„,...,',,c.1•:.4.'1;',..',.k,•:%,-).'..!...,••:.•,,.:•,,,.?),,.1;,...1.!..,,,..?,.;..,...:.i,;,:.,:!„."-.,:q•N:.ii:::....;;;,....?g,I...:.4?.:9,i':I...,....c..i,•,:•-..,",..1,41.1,.:',..",...`,.....i.,..'•!1,;•::-..7,,,..•r;t::::.,•,V..1...?.,',,..„.1::::'•i'i•1::,...:•'.'•:••,•:,:•;:'1:1::,,(4?1•44..,'..,":.• ..•.• -:' • . •,.....:•,.i.,..1-.) ,,:•,,•,.t:''.:Yi'':1/4..t..;•. .,I.•::•.'•4'sii.: '.',.?:: . .... . ..:• .., i...:,:•:•-;•',...•,e'.,.? •,,,.-.;,., -,',•,,'•,.:,-...!::..i.:::::;fi,A.:.',:•-',, .....:',.,,..- .,,....1,.i .•,..,.„. ., 3 .. . , . ..,.,.,,,.„..... ,... ,. ••,•.,• ..1-''',••••• •••••••';','1' 'f-:-.....*:.`lircl::..-•;'•'21•1•P;.:::,';i:.•:•::".!:;:Y'f?'''':,;':',;:f:Af•':':-.PA:il,,Ar,1 ,e.t.•...•..,.;v.*...,,•;•v.;••;,..,,,$.4.;.:i ,4,..!•!•-.,.:'ii,:,.:••.;•,•I,'"c::,,.';•.'itt ',... .•. . 1,''',•;.•.•,,,..',,,,:i qn 4:,.,,,..•."„,-,..t.,..,;'••:,,,,,•••..‘.,,,444•g I.4:7'.1-‘:. .I''-.'P;.•.'.4'..'•:‘5, 41 .‘,...'1,•;...,i';i•.1.F.;,,,i,;.•,•,.:•q., ,••:.,'"••1•;:P.i.:',r.3A'-k4ft'ff••,1.',•• ••;••3C."4:4,''''.''‘'••••4'.(2',',',0.•';',.!,;•2;)•,.:.-;•••\Z^'''7•'•!,••••••:•'•A.'4••141;•',6'.:"....•,:i•••."•••'..• ..• . 4 C1, /... 1C . 1 ,..,. ‘..'ff•I •'.• ,.:1.:::''1.: ''..:1.::"-I:PS :':t:'.;.:i'''''.:"'•.;1'../•''';'':.';:.',.i .' i,-..;•.:..i'...,: i:•e7t,.:,1...*.'. .:::.•::':'..i:S,i,,•:•f,;4:•.:Y..,.01.:•‘:,0,, ..,.1::,'.:!.:,,.-';',. .P j-:.f',,i,','TV,‘,1,:? ,•:!';:::Z:i'•tli:,!...'',`.,:•'‘,.,':. f','•..,"' '''',':';'•'..:i?.. 'i'. 1.‘:;•:::;'•,..::•''.::::?•;',...:,:`.:,•,,'•:'.?; . ,i',; . ...;.'......:;.::,•i.::1:. 11;".. Wri.,:?ii:.7.;:,...!...'••;','•,.'...:',1;?,; : ,..',..'.. .;:.t.'''.e.;;;,' ''.`•',1;•.:`)."•••?,;?4 z...'....:1'...1.1',.'..67.''.''i ':?•:.4.'3";!,'.:".4.':::C.1;:',';:::'•;"!.....gi:!'•:•;',.`P',;':-.....••: .: • '- •... • i ;•::,k.r•i;t:',;;...,,,,•:".,: .:.','',.`.',•••'..,,;.'i'',.. ::,....1',....:..'''.........'i,";.,'••-!,!''....:.' ,......,,,,...;,.,......,t,.....:...,..,..„..,......, „..,.....,.4i, ,,I....,.....,,,..)..,:',.,•,-•q•;,,,,, ,;.....,•••„••• ....,•,,),,•••t---,--„.,.., ••' • '''••••••••\A i'''''-‘i;•'••• ••'...P,..••;.;'...t."-.';•''...P:',..i'...!,•'...',`••••••••.•,;'.:',:'..*:•;;••'' •74 ..f,'.•.''A`,•::•ti:''',"A'.':'•::cf.i#'1.'',"?...4.:41./;:f-L4',.'') ''....'',':-..".'e'e.x;r:-:. 'i'',.':••77<•r1).,;•..1,'.''.1'''''''. '2.i4.1'''-''.01.•.:-..-•-: •-• i1:Y::%'?'!.,VP,!::,,::,5,.':.'IY::.*;*.:;*5. :i41.;..'!;';.: i'. . c*:.; :'? !'' 4":'k ;• .?lfY. . '7:4 *':.1;14f .. n4ib*'•;' , Nqf,'-. ::!-' ' '•.'•'i••..: v,j ik.i'lc.''.,;;?;:',.,;'.•'.'•,*...'..'','•.•'....,..i'''tek-•..':•'''.,',;'-'•';:,....:.t.:'.';';7;:,'''•'•'••••••:444' .'"?qk.i':'t.''•,..i.i';/01•1,s'C'4!.‘''..14'........,..I..'s,;:-.'•',(V.e. ...?.'.1!•;;:.01,1' s:'t ;.••J'.•;'4ii.•,,,c./.-:if;.5.....):::•;'•: :,f.•,;.'1,1•:•:',.,,,',...•i'o•'...:4::.•'• ,,,,fx:•-:g.:.,":••••::i ..,•• • •.1.0;•;C'itif'-'...5•.:: ....1'.i:•‘!:L..';'. :;••/''';!!'....'V;'':(3.‘;.stk.''''.{... •r.:,......,t/1;''f•t........'''' 'LZ..:Yfj,..'•.;'4;,igS'A'T:e.‘•Vfil'l'ir'... .:......'31:111;*6;.::.:•:C:!..*>.;;Ie:t; i.P''T„-:.:,'".1.‘.'';‘.,..;1",':',.‘.:',,:?:.P,j.,...1/`;‘.!!.A‘P.,;;‘•Y::;'/::.*,.....,:',.'.....!;:),. .1;",141]; :..:.•.;,,...;•... .,!:,,,.,'...:'...,•:;,;•' 'S,V.,1*?:cif.. ..!...;:.:'•:::,z,,".;„•,.•.;•4::•t..:.Y.':;,.‘"..'..,,..'..'.i...i.1.::r3;.4i......s.:.:i^'I i: '..yq•P.'..,'.{1i..10:kPl thliPc','!,.?!...T1.11,:f5i'!.;%:..;:p.I.f.1..:fit 4.}:••',..4.•••••:f.'','''.;-••9';‘,'.1'.7,..,:..a,;:147.;:::.,,i....... ,..:1:',"..,,',Y..i';''''.'..4 f.';.:;;Itr'-41,2.,,,!.*:.:'•'i•'.....,•. . 'i . • '.'11r.44.1.i:.i.t.'''' ',.'•;:'•!.''.....• ...L'.'....,..grli...•'‘.,;••••••f.'..:'''.t..P1.:1:`..r.s':'!'..t. . :j,.f...1.1.,1•':•.,le.iP41...;.,•:1.,47.•?.01.4!.\2.`p'1Z.4.4":"6'..'•'24. "ih.“4..cr/)..',...q.:Z•17P,'t).'hl.... ..'...;';'..r:/•.': 4'.•••';:i%"?''''.":',',:X.''';''''',./..P.•''. •.'. "•. ".,i.:..:.‘,"!..':i'Fl; ...A,,,...,/......::,,'%.,;':••,!%., .....,..?:',' ,1*.--"41, :'•.•...'.4'.*,,i.,..,;.;.... .‘',•• t"•''.r;e•,.?...%.,',..1Y4'?..'64'i'r.',;;ji;c'ii2;?•71''•;',',11q,'•1•1!'.•...i.,.'4,,.'€'+'.,,I.,?:...,•:i.lr', t:{rj,.••;'•,••••,.;',:•:,;•. ,..N,L:ii.f,f4t.f.' YN:Lati1:14"-,;.:-.:•;*,.‘....P.Z,!0'.:'.••';;;. ,•-•:*,. :(':1,',:;";.!;;:*!:;'`-'.)':; ,.::.. ..':( : S.11/71,,, . .C,'N•;'• : •* ''4•1;1•'', ‘I • ;` 1.)1.11 .V1;.7:/..1.',.`'''.'•'4P...1.'1:,4...'"*I.'',1:::•••••••['..." ;:*'...2:7.:,:•."'1•'-';:* ".--; . •* • '1'''''''''. ''7.*:'.41.1:10:11‘...?*:....,...?';':';:...!;•;•2:1'L?.....:1`.';'??.•••;:'.":'•••774,::::',...:*','' ..0'..:::.: ***•.';',A •41:4 :13.if:,.1.. r13i;.;...i:'f'ty.,. .4...!;: c.* 1;,t‘v:i1•;•••4?4'.'.1i,'!:•.!:.`ti,i•-.;...:4:•,, ..,;!•. i....ii:-'1*••'.,'i ,1:.:!;.'.); iT1;''LL''.i4'......''''........ ;,.?„:t•tr.Pr,...I., ..,1)• -.i.:::',..•.1';'-•-f ;•:.•.• .',..,' t;;'.,::,.,-.'',.:-/,`,5%, ,‘.1)..... :j.• ' .\ ,..n.sri-,,.;',i4,.;?e;....i.Y.,:;.5,..q.,' .-,•*r•r•T-',',-..--..,.',,s.'.:tg'i',i',.....;......•tv,.......s.! ..:4..i:k.:.,....:.'i..'......'e,-.'•:::.%.i.•:. ::!e,-.:...94f,:''...'•. . : . . .. °,.,.-........!..,:•,.....,......k., .,,,cte...,,,,....,,.....-..,..,,,...,,,,•,,,;,,,,...1,f,-4-;.:Ii•,:,•,...t:J...,.L-...,...:17:::,,,,...;j:,:./1/1•,.4,,,•....,..;,?.,r1., ;;.:,,•,,,....3., ,;, ;4 .,....4.•:.t., ti„,0.•,..,,,..; ;;;P:9f.c:.?...'-'j.::::.filY.::.',Ji:,4X,.7:.7•;• ••-1.':'....:.::::::::.:',:'•'.;''f...,'';,!,t•is111,0;i'.'':'-.: ••' .:.• '':,:.:vrl'i:•`•••:‘::',4 ,:: 7•:;:t.i.:,..1.:;,......-...-;/. . 1,‘:.... .,.45,.-.:4-., . .!„..p....i.,ort...v..1.•\::,...m!Att,: .'i,.,,...;,•-•-.1,:*...,:cgi,,,,:,..,1-...-...5J.,:c.,,,,.?y,,,y6,A1,..,:,,,...:-.,iii....,,.....,,..,:‘,..iv.::,,,,,,y ,,,,..-,A7.•,.../...::,..,,f.:,.,,,,,,,i,• ,A,..,..p.i...:,...... , ,. •,,:.,!,:z.,..:•:,....,,,t:....,-,..,..,:..?:,?„..,.,:t„,,,.....,:.,....,a....-...,•,,.::„.q,..,,....y,.,•:....,... . , ..ys•;:,......,,.,.......0,,e,:.. .:.,-,..,:;•,..,:f...,,i,,,..,.1•,!•;:ki,.-....,.4‘ ,.).c.i,....,....;:,,-,,.;.,..,'--,;•.,• ,...),....-f;':..:•:,,,,•„•::.-;i,., ,,•••;,..,,,4;,::.41:..:.•. i .: . ••••:',••:•:•'•-...• '.2r.f.?••:Irit4-i'•;•:;••!-,••:.:,;:g.,••.:.'0.,..../.,-,i,,, I.-,••••,..1.; 0:...•.,•.i', : •;.:;1.. :' ',:•?' '•:..r,...11.,• .";.'1..•'•'; ;:.`.i..g:-...!&;-...,„•••?•;i!CciAi'::!:;•m:si;;f‘4.•....,:,.:•;,....;;V:(;•-.;..'::.,;:?.....:,..,:,'.'•. -i,l'..s.;;•,1 ' ..,,,,.....:•„:.;k:,„:•.,,,,cfn,'..,:.,.. .. • -,.... In , to ..,, e ... , s 1. ...," 54. r • , - . 1 • 1 7?.. • ,t..7..''.;.:.",,:;:k..",•1:?';:,..;.•,?...'4.•V.'-'•,' '.,f,',1'.'':-...'24'.,'..q,?.:..' `;'.:,.:. ....;;A , ,!'.-7.1y•-•,,...se,,•,••....,••:ro.•,...r.;'.••,•',7.-•-•:,.••••.!•,,...,;-.1,:,:illiti,,4:.•2;,.•:,:r.c'r...',,;:1 4:.';'.i'•i t:,:,4,..,,,..; •':."';is t.;'‘.;.•' '..',s14.‘.;.:;)..'-'':i . ..-. ' ;'''..,..;....',..''3,.'10,„.....1k.lii;V::::;;'-ki'::;.•••••:-.1.1'',0:1.;L:•':';''''??'.-,it........,1:,...V.!;•'..'';S i..r.r; ".".i. ,' ''-'",t'l Oki J.) .:;:ii1'..*bs.1,41v4.:st';'11•1•Y•li'...1.1. -.5'1-,--i'•",`.?..'.•'1',11.1•••••••••••-q:';'1il-N,.;`i?.I.':'•1'.z•:'.e': 0,.•-/:.',.•,•.••••,:',.4,-"V,1":::' - .• - . -•'-';'. :•.:-;,';',1Akiigi..-,:Y.,:-.....',i•••\7?:-..,!:?.?•:'•-:?;'gr..Y:i;1!;•'-`.••:11-.'e.,:•.:‘....:;:-.;:;;':.,,.-•,''f..=,$1!.' e'4;ri,i';',,:AVI-yi.'::,,,,-.„'1.•;‘,:1,-: ittZzA.;;;0•,,..4.,.,:.:„;‘•6:••,.;;V:',,,!•,.;.ii,.:ft,q,:/:„.:t:.!,•zi,;.',.•:„7.,...):: :If p:1•i•.!,;;;,.!.::.7.,;..:';;;;1;.,•11I.,•,••; . • - . •t'....:6.4::.,•:.:::;:,'i...:,..-.--t.:4.-f-,..,.‘,it..:...'--. ',,. ..15:;1'..,',..:''r+i.'t:.;,';',::..,..:::,ii?...,,,,... ....?•,.... I. .;•,..0.:"..1 '1,•,-.,?'7,....v1.0.c'!.....,''.•;L$64.:,;.,%,:AvZ.c1;;;:4.',.:ti...;'',...V.;:i1,,.,••.,;.:;:';'.;i•:':..;•.:.;'2."!,'.:17,,.,j'.,q-,-.. ..'.-P•<•',*.i-,.!..,.:?:.'..!*;:'.,.,',..,,..:'.... ),2,...Vr....".-:, .... . . .:. ,:i.o..1..-?.• ill,'I•p'2.-•:Ir•',:•'••;.p.•;:'•).!•'1•7).•• •••••::44......:.•';:'';-''.',Y1:?;:f.;•..'..' .tt... $... -''.Vtj%.,1;"i •-!..,.,,,i';..'3'..,'.%;:..k;,';';'.'iP.It. i.:':-.''.$11iYA.'1',1,..,1e:.:..:C't..:11;. ;;?..,::Yr'Z';/..•e•-',...",•r-,11W,I;,:;':'.. lY,',.".••,•L'r.i',.:i '•:'';-• ''.:•'••i• • :' ,.,, ; ,...•, .1,,..,,...,, .,,,,,.,.,.. .......4,.... ....i,..-•. •,....V•,. • -,.., 44",,,,;,i...,$.,:s,,Ii/4,0,.1,...... ...T..-.41.7,..,„'...,•:,1...-..3..r.e, y tr.•,:4...•••,1•I!;'/;`.•,''.".I'.4-7,1:-'4",1••,!":1•0....':',4f,,,,,..'/..I'•:,•Y..:-.4';,.,'T.I.filk,,r? 1 , ..,',',.?',..;.:,•:7::,(.,:,"",i,Nt,i.:(1'.-:ft;'.':'•?,;;-;-/Ta'...!:.;:c•'•,"p .`.,2..t3::1,,1:: •?,:'..,:;?:!,..: 1::,*,:.•.: ,''' ;V:;,••.,'*:,•1,:,,,,..,1.,;,:;4;.4)1;ij••,.::,;:.177,.'',..,$?.:."..,„Z.,Vii.:ki'-.,.;;;;,-.';'! .-.1,:;...:Y:',..:',..:1'f,t1.11':...::::::.'Ofii'il::::$:A:7.,i ;':',.; '''',e•f:......:2•••C'•1'.'4:::::;:.- • .- '.;1;'3.. ..:!1;'...:.*:,,1; 1141.i:'.:k1;'•:,......4.':,;‘;...):.:::Z„1.1114..'.;r;...'...'.fl!'zi:4•:....'j5,‘,./..;'if 2s1;7.......'ii'. i'..1.,,,;',..'•:;;....'4....e,..,,).:k94',i1.•••'..•,,i4.` ;', .c..1'-.''.`<•*-;t.,,r; •••i'•'.:••'••••• 1';§:'•1•••••'''-....''tif'••'•-",-:"!•••••'':'':;'''SIF.c ,':'..••••;''••••••i::'11V '•"-': ' • • i ..,.,,,,,,, •1•:.•,,,t,+..:,t,i,?::t...,....r.,,....i...,.....i...,.....,;:..,,,....,.....,•;ilt‘..y.f.....,,,......,:..:.. .,.....,,....,,..,....•.i,..,,...,......;.:,.2„,........,..,....„.....:i,.,,,, ,,i,ii..,,,.,,,,•.,4;,.•,,,,,•,.,.::‘,..,p,„..,„,,,t......1,11......-•,..,:,,zi,..;......,.•:.,.,.,. ,,,or,...,,z....;,.,c;..,,,....;,,...!..:1 4-,..,..0....,::.!....4v!.,..•,..1.?....,.....•.,..i.,.......,..;...., ,..i:::;,...,.....:;.,:), :...,•,!....,..2;••,... ...•, i..,"/,...,.,., it4.,,.#0,11.,'•:..'..: . i .: ..,:•••••'..,l'{',•,::;;',,,...;1;:.,?.,1•;•'''. .1.1,.:S ,,..-,,..i .. :.•,!:•,..,,,,..-,,,,,•.i.i.:.:.:,....„:.:•:.; ...,,.....-:.:,•;,Y.,,• .:.:•: ,!..;•,,dil?',..i.:•:1,.:!i ; ;k-..,... '•:j.:(i'..-.••;. 11...,,1 •".•, .,t'A.A.1-"..,i;•;•;'•11•••• `;,:',.',,•,.‘ 1..,'.1.i -'"...:• , "...,.•'.:.',..•;' ...'..',....1'.• ." ,' r.'• :::•'..., -.... 4 nci!.....:,...... ,'......•:,;:,,.' ,....., ..i.•,...;:. ; .....:.....,!•••••.;;:.„ .,. syt.,.');1;-;,:';,.:.;...',•!.:;;;.1.,•;',.',.', •.'s,•,..,:.‘.,1:::: ,j'' ...,1.., •;•,`1)3..5;..t,..':' ' •'..'..•','..' . •• ....• ',.• ' ': -•'" •• •' '''.1'...k:'11. ,;..... !..•' .'.??.'•••I "•t •',