Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
LUA87-005
RELIANCE UNITED PACIFIC SURETY MANAGERS July 13, 1992 , City of Renton 200 Mill Ave. S. Renton, WA 98055 Gentlemen: RE: SUBDIVISION BOND NO. B1449549 - Stoneway Concrete, Inc. - Landscaping at Stoneway Renton Headquarters Site. Bond Amt. $6,037.00, eff. 9/26/88. Under date of, Reliance Insurance Company became Surety on the above captioned Subdivision Bond. ' In order to bring our file up-to-date, we would appreciate your noting at the bottom of this letter the present status of the work. A stamped, self-addressed envelope is enclosed for your convenience in replying. Very truly yours, By: 614l v�1 Reliance INSURANCE COMPANY Bond No. B 144 95 49 DATE: Has the work been completed and accepted? If completed and accepted the date upon which our bond was exonerated: Resolution No. IF NOT COMPLETED, is it progressing satisfactorily? Percentage completed to date: Probable Date of completion: (SIGNATURE) (TITLE) BD-2151 ED. 2/85 • ALeron _9i bi 1r2--04 tut , - - - r10)-0 AV)?/-01 7rr' , I . • E-9200 626 No Postage Necessary Attn: � If Mailed In The United States BUSINESS REPLY MAIL FIRST CLASS PERMIT NO. 5152 PHILADELPHIA, PA POSTAGE WILL BE PAID BY ADDRESSEE RELIANCE SURETY COMPANY 3850 COLUMBIA CENTER 701 FIFTH AVENUE SEATTLE WA 98104 3 „,„ . , s WESTERN PACIFIC PROPERTIES, INC. • Commercial Brokerage Company 1- CITY OF nENToy MFebruary 2nd . , 1987,.. FEB 41987 •---� BUILDING/ZONING DE.PT, Building and Zoning Department ,Renton Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South ' Renton, Washington 98055 Re : Shoreline Application toneway Concrete , Inc . Dear Sir, As per your Public Notice published in the Valley Daily News on January 30 and February 6 , 1987 R2065 concerning- Shoreline Application, Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit please add us to the mailing list so the we can -be ,notified of the action taken. Sincerely, WESTERN PACIFIC PROPERTIES, INC . ray M. \E3c e›,„)m Larry M. Brown - • f • JB2. 20 2/2/8.7 • 13975 Interurban Avenue South • Seattle,Washington 98168. • (206)241-1616 • • • ■ • • ■ • • • • • • ■ • • • • • ■ • • • w w w • ■ • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ■ • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ■ • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ■ / ■ • • • ■ • ■ ■ • • • • ■ • OOOOOOOO 1jf . 1 • • • 1 f, $ , e vr • • • ,.tA• ,. r'%'' !. 4, ' IC, • 4 Ii '�r:a t j 41 . i I:, II + r R4 'i . . r • 1 • ....;'''.049r1;4t44.-t . •••'' ' . ,. ; 'y • tN .'< 01104 l ' ,' • • t I,• K)crli . I.1 • . , ' , • .`'`, '{ {ti 1. ' tj • r t . i " 1 ' � ;, r. .a• '114. •40 'sue. �, 1fE 11 isi`jam+ ,; • y - ,`. / $-t T -L- . .. 4,10'70 TI- ...W AiSiat F:Et: ' .. 4ir---4-..iv,.,%,.."6.xt; .01.,4,,„-,,,„,-,,, . .,i.; i' . . • !.....Its*,.... •,4,4v , A liei; tk.V • 'Air:.,.,t V,'' 1. !...st.‘16114:1 ''.. ..fk - t. ,Itl-r -;,-.0.,r':•!.)-.:::, .i t, . ',, ,,,,,,,,i( ...k.'''. .• .T-' .• ' ../ '4' ,'-' {.•••/tit:,.''•t • 1 ' ":t' ;e•/14 f NIT'L'A' ' ' . ..X';:!f 1 f.k:..:i 1 f.'1.•.,,,,,,,e-,„.:i. ..,...., • ..:,,,,....„....,.....c.,,.,A,„..., • •, i......"';'":1' :- .... , (14, if 4 ii J,i i fa, 1 , . . , ; . ... •4. A. 4;•;:4 ; ,, .lt ,7.^ N9 1!.:. • `2. A . . .. -, • —- • . -, , . • 4 ... -.''.:?'~:, ,•:...1, •. ' , ...5 4. / ' ...41 Itr • • Ss. .-.1%, ', . • .. ..,.;4A3 , . , ..t j 1 j _7 a .. . t�.. I o !iiltiliiil irr ,.,,.z, t i i; ' • `,1.i ' 11, . 17• 7i - • ,s IP ifr„ 1)1' v- ' .- - L. . „ *4 N t 'f't ► w ., iiitt - 4,t. Sz, irtro;o44• ' • . Ia., .. r �iyy]j'>t. t1 M •��J1, 1 ,.. . 1 t IT 7$:, iii . -4 31k ,, ,, , 1,. , ,.4.4 iii... 4 . ; . le ,.• -.' .i,;.‘.: 11,16 - -, ,-.. . , %•"/ 110 t, ii ''•4. -.^ .',•i• - ''', k4V;I:Pc.14:atr,-11X, ' . t ' toillit,..,it 7- I( .....--- , :10-s' "• •0 . .,. .r., - ...114 - t, , ,*,:?!....:- •,:s.. ...h:_. ... ,,..-. . A't-.., ` ' ' 4,`• v 31.•' '•- : *, . - 4:. .= • ,- ......- •-- :.,.- ‘1,-. _,„ 'f: riri,. .:1`-b:'44,: 2•A.:;-.."- -. 1 '? flellot. l* *-‘ A - ...,,vii.•,..,- .-.. .. ,..% v, ,..... I. '344• . •k ii! ..,' Air"• . .," -' • 1' •' - 4.-lk.. 'Ri "0:4%itt41(k . is' ,v.••. A , *.*- - :e. : ,top.- ...- • i •' , .Nir ..‘,,,. 4 e 6 ', • Is .A. '''.•O''' ' ,. 0 ...i .10,1.f.d.: 4.6....i• 117 .. 4. Sr, ..._ , t ' . "Ns f - . • . , • , -.. • i . . 4--, .'''', ••'- . • • '••••4* ' 4f ' ' •/,ill t, s ,, t• ‘, . ''.. •Ni - .1pl•tb, - •-1. . . .ft"" tr,.....*_., r-' . . . vk•tar-7-.- - . -I -.. • i.,4' • , A IP .. • • .• •,;..... • -....-- ...nr- '* . ' ( t - .4t1.4- , , u ,„ t..-, 1 ---• -- • . 3 .1 • : A - • , . •- ..,.N. 0 . . . , — ,"z '1•:-:•.`/S . .7_ . 71.11.11.1m, it •• . . . -1...„ _ ...,. ......,,...ciu .r, V '•:,...t• 4-4 orliew ..,: • ..... . „ i . I . .r ,J.4.s.'. . .s. .011..,..:: • ' - . ..'F; '.' .. -. . A.. 4- -...,. , .-.. , .11. Al •... . • '41.. ". Z•••• . ' • % .! .. • Nei • . , -, ' ::-',•• ,- • 4. • , , 1 ••••, •- '-' ....' - It ' • - .s....• .1%' 4,2 • 7--fik ,..,. •-1 -;.,:acy:-' •va... ......-,. '. lc' 4,•: e. —. se .. , • • ,:-...4:. -... 3 • - • '... :• -4-z••• . - :-•—••• •• • - . • , . ... .._. , ..... 7- / ? -87 — —-, '... ._ -`X . ... - • •{ , •„.• 0 ' .. • ' I'..4•1..;.' Vt, II ' ,,•• , . ,I., , ' pot 1. , 4., ,..1.44...k....):-, N. . \'. . 7 • 41.N4 ti -. • .1- 1: le.l•0..,. • .1, , :. ,..1:k.A;is,..: f 4* • ' 4 '1/4" ' , p ,,,., . $, ' ft,I 4,4" 4," *Or• • I 4, •e 4" • ! .Iv . 77 , , , ,, . A 3t : • -1 A •;'`,44r: • . c: . ., . .. • ,... .. ii'll141141 ,,L .. ' . • . Nilb i .,I . -,- •'''r . . .. . \ 'I .11 ,. 1 ••.-- t\,„ • . , •N ' 1 ik. ..ki • , ...,.., • . , i . f , ... te,. ••• . ., ..-,. ....:1/ '-'1 : x • 1' lt •1. '6 ., .14,. . •. , ., , . • *1111 (N.t I.1. _, . . 4.t1 .. 4, '74 i• , rAliiit 1• A,v ' ' t * •• gioris . . • /ii.::.A. • .i..t,: _ . .. .- .i •:,,, r II 'i Ir" ii.. ' • • f , • ' , - • 1:/,‘,. • • . „. •7.• .0 . ', ‘, 'c,:.... •,,,; ,. .., . • , , t• 1 . • . ,., , . . '•• ' v•.....,;„ • ''.,7. f:- . . -.,..... .. 31 . t, 01.. . • "A‘- 4 .• • r/ 0 . . ... • 54 ..I' 4 4.... ; •t.• • ; •3,„,,,. • , • ' oiti1514ilk.' '"' •• . .`.1 : , • 1.1" - 70.31P .e . .•• , - lipi • fi y, /�� 4 d+{" .• _ ![e .), • .l.. i ! r 1 1. 4 4i A 4 I.- .,t, i 1 4 • ..... -. , . :ii.i•• 1 .- il 1): 4.i 11:141'';1.1.".. '.., • 'i -4;11- /.g' 4 .. ..., ,r, 1 • - 7 ,• 1 1 N i V , .., ,,,• ,-.r , , . . — — IN, ‘ - . • • I r Iv ,c,_ It II . "la , ._ , . • - .--.4, , ...eitk.,404116, : ,..... S6r . . t ' rtt t•" - •,. . .... . • - AP.o.. ,,,,,1 . ,. , y • i i , •t -••,..,.... * (.:, i, • - ri i( - .-- ' -:-I -• •. • e,c,..,t4 A i ,.,• - 1„,c• , • . , . alib:____AIIP.. --..,'• \, 'll'il • Niblt.11•:.7.1,•. .\ ,,,.t fr",7, ‘,1v • ',&• — '' it: ‘,, '-\•1/4", Ni.— ' - N - .. . 1 4.,..1 ,-.-••--,'.....-: . „.....-- -‘ -‘,, . . 46 ... (.. .. I : t - — "r"-•? • 's'i,."4 . ••• '. ...-• - t ..I, ..... ' IF • — . .":•4 ,t \k: "2,, !• ' ..4 _ , 71 • --‘ • , ..1..•:•• t„; 4.6. . ''.!' , i' •1. • .- 'Ilk. ' . •N -4,- . - . • • i . , .. . ••• .. : 1 ,. I , , . i ' . ‘` '• ' ! # 1 .A. • •Jr 'MO ,-- 7, , ' , 4 ' • ' • \I c ., , • ,. .,.. ....• .... „ .,,,,••.A-7,, ,. •......,,,:, , -- .. T.,.tli-vir,• _.• •• - . • . .. ... ,. . \1,,,„ , • . • ,... .:. „tow'. . , .,., --• .out .. • ' - •-.,...,.. 10.... ---- ... . .. _......irowir- ...r, /Zit* f.',: ............hLII b.' .it•C.2 i. ):' '4, ' 1 ir., •e. p. , . -...--.............".‘,4,...... y , , .'s. ; lb ' 4 ' , 4, • -4' A '`\'''• •- 4% 46: - ''' • .. v. Nteith :), . t:., ...4' •r• . '. :l'''.. .i • — •.. • , . ,i , , • ji-4 I -% ' ••• sli• 4 ,- y ' -e • s v' , 1 ,' A a 1i . � •� fig• ., 'i+. "fit r ►l'', • g( ! I, a. F`•. 4 r' A4 t • t t P u . • • : -*:' Atzvi --1, '" - ... 0, ... .• - " . . • • .•. . • • • . .- . : WALL-- 'It"Ir ::-.. .. / • :: f . .. gip+ - �.�fktf : / : i"• 's ';e " .. ,40- ' .: ::.2.,. '.:' . ..g a Ar"..ilia . /'.. ,/777. . - :5cte...,,riiko,..: ob. -,41.,,,, ..::„..,,..--,. ."-.. !. . ..--s: Gi !!t . 1 .,,th., , *no" ....v.:, %-•-• .„\\ .. ,v.lowiLikup,„; ,,, ft. ‘,.:.: .- . --. 1.2,01, 1, •1?„. : IciA 400 rm.." - „:3,,__ ,i.,, r f:. . k.,!,N,;,•>'....' '" r. _ .,.... , Qy6 .. t ' mac? .� ,fi . 7• , • l ,,, rv..,aC"-'•.','•' ''aid. V},.t•. -_- .,,,,7.-- —^-.... _.. 'd'n -v" J �% � .t- Aa: P`^ - ,r`•. : r\i , .,--.,a-� ,- /� - ....CiOt' .>0. )4:1110a:. fo AM ....:--..-, AY ' ' ' - N/ ., ,,, ite ..\\.... _ • , . !.. i i .i , ,. -,. dr, /--../ Niose*Nlic.4. .1,- N.,r, : 'ilk in ., -,•Ni . • la - i. otouivzvDtariver-40 - ' - -,,, -gi[ww,.. ,-,. -,, - - . ,.• •. . ,..e `ewe - // `'' , - g' _ k ��•. Air'NO ^+h t; i' ofy v ,yam.. ' • ` •..... a MM �r.r... .. ,Ia' ' _ • - ti�\ i , io. , 4.9 .... ' ' i'i 1'4 ' . a, k ,.. 1_ . �� • , • 41144 ... il. , .1 Ia. a t ',e!,AI. # 4. iri� h,t * I ...1,41. `.; Z ' •, ',. it T ' • 1t.1 , r•l • . ii,y,y I It;' • , l F 3-Z7 -YS . ..• .•, -,,,: ••• - '.i•;.!,,,,:‘,4t. .4k.1• i , Ifr: ' . f . ... . 1,,,r . • t,„ ;_-_,:.0,,,, _, , ' -11 .r.• : 'NI'a' N VT..-, t,.. ,..-... . --It .,..,k,'.,,...!I il:et!,. ,,• ..=: . A ' `, ,. .e7;" i-'*40 1.?••• '•A -' ,W ltit 1' :,..!--..-....., ,,,... •:: . .... . ... . •411. . , 1,.,,..1,, '1,,•.. - *.lAVV4'., .-. ..... P., ,4,ie..174,:r:t••' - ••••:,•%,.',„';'' "s-4" , .-.: '..11 • .,... , ..... _ • , _ _., ..zz, p„.....„ed..: .... .. 7't.'• /, '' .• t"Ar,-5;:.t'..,•••••f. ':,t0 , r.• . , s.,4, : '—.•., • .,- . ,!4 -. "S",AMA„•:,„,6t ,: N14,, , '',. 4.0,.i "•,,,:'4_,'"*-- ';* 4(61‘;',rt: i„,.e,'7. !• ' I "feirA.,:-•"'.- .".F.-% 4tik....' ''''' 111,•:, ,,,ktir': I, ' •\ ' .;.r..-7 4- ',...0.ry AT' '..."'•'.'. 4 ,,,' "'• .t . __, c" •%-1'..:- '•'''. , • C r'•4", ef,...,-.44--''„• , ,...4, t..tt• •••.3.-.''-'4......,-.0,,,,X ,_ ,.. rA,tr,4.'1.• ,S., • -.'' YI'4,je44,`•• •^ilei• •,.t.' -1); .e:;,trs 4...4''..,44 •1..i ...', , ,,„';'.:;(0/1.-•,.4,.. a';41 .. - ‘^;('6':;ft, ;./'41r.-1.f.vV-'•:'t ''',x'' x wi 7:11, 1,,. y:r: ,.,,..: -...,...,.. . ..., z.„4,,...;,, ...,....4,!.. i... • ,,,,,- 44: .....4:,‘• - • 't ..,,-•.. ,vs•-, ,•. ,",,t, ,,,,' ..-,:...—...;...t , . • ,4..; •,.•, ....4i: , .`,.. i - - i.,0. 7 •- ..—tr ... -• ,: , - " '''-', '-', ' , ' ••1;4- --- ' .; ' l. 1,4 A . !!-.>-- If , , .'"-.•-•"( vr k I. l.t rit • . 4. .q,i,c., t. ::s;wy„ I r s �j �ht F'�:,��Y. I� 1}_ ` ,.�.i..,:. r } Mt at 3 -22 2 � r — . i• -, 4:ii .. , ir • ,tri$,N 'x,,' L,"1 , - . i.k., -, 41.. 4.,'!", •.'.;.; r• '. ' / - t'fro '' kt " -.I, '.'e• ' ,. ' .'" ,,' ,/ , . • ' ' •.-, :. -.0„-C,,!.. ,_ - , \. i. . , . . , /1,,,.‘ i'lz 4,'tip,•f4t ,'. :, k 11c. 4,,„...4 • lf “:44 .•4 \' '. ;4) • .*, , • '., \ ,- . .., **."'4 . , % • •44,. ,,r . ‘stk ,' '...4,‘,,- . ‘ ....**!•4,,,..••1;4\ ), ti , . ft,,, .,• . ; 1,,,vb: , ' . V,, •.... -;,, • , , , „. . 'i. v •- v.: — ' , .......... .... . „ ,,,,...1..,,la,,, ‘.-i, , . • , ,,, 'r, ". . :\ 'J.; V st'kf• %; 1.'.....,4:4 ,'1."` • ;, 4 . .. . - - — .16,. '44 '''''.:All• ,,,v, .., in •-..', ,,:...4,.. -Ay', \..''z,.; , . - :' -I,. . . . .„; ,'"Cf;s4,'‘‘, '' ..4 fa° ' , • ' 1 itiifif , . $ - .- ..• . 4c,fti. • ' ''. , '- - 're ., t \ il ,v . •,. -,-,.2:4‘' If‘. t^ ,,i'ri . .r:'''. •.,.-., . . `'.- s" -4- ..1.9i :.,,%,,' .4-,...r, , I-. ,,,, , '.• II ' Irr '''.5' • '4 \:, Sk\i,- N-914 ,.• •-.• • . . •.4, . " ' - ',4 .‘,..; X.1\0,,,,:if. ( .• m.., .. ! , re.. \ • : , - --- • • 'i f.. .ri A '..' 1N, ,... - .c_i. 1,'..';.`:•,,fis, ,'.'q .1 44:1, ,,,- N-Z: i • ' 0 " .)., ••••4,1 ..1)"/N • "\ 4 ., • N' i ', i is f r r- .x:."S.r�i-:ter. s A\ \ ,,.. —,- elvitt r. . 4 1 igh ,,,10 i ""' j1 ., 4\4 • tX je' tt ,06,1) re 4 � ,�; r a• z :,�x . r '4411 ;.""f171 t„" tt Y!k 1Ylt{y"t Lt. ' JI +R Js 'At i'• 4 .t f '41 ,.le II,. .40t. i f- i MV i 4 1 , . , Vi",c,'•-••4!- - .. , '. j 4 ° • , •if , t ' ..''., •t 1;. • i:,1 4, , •••• • , ,1,1 , I, , •1 . .. .„, 4• , • f,1 ,} • — • cl•P', •,, • . 411 1 I?. • •'i•' , -• i '":? • • 1 •' „',. e• :•••., ' •`• •t 4 , ' I• • . . . • ' . ..... A f : ,:- ! 4 / S. •••14' .. ' 'e, .t,'•;; ' ,- r • . --•"ii` , ' t 4 4 j •-• ',4 . I .,,... •;I. . •4. ' f A -A•,:, ''' ; 4 40 1 i 1 1 . vf. f 1, 1 • ),: 1 r� , .,. :. t, i . .. i. . . . . t ....•. _ . ... , . . .. .... , t . ., :fir; �, ' !r rt' ..�r , ... . ...,,,.. , ., .., • •• ,.. ,. ..,. . : . . . • •• 4• ` . 't 477 vri t•• �.w E,. I' i yj: 1 i 1 • ... - ' i 1 , ,, i . I API* f . 4. fiffr 4417ir II' , „,, • o4 ; -,• pi i /4, f • '' . , , ? (, 1 1,... •,,) . ... Iik •)::t.' ` • • t i 44 1, • ... ' $ ..--- , i 1' Ifill /$1: ' ..1,, .• . r : 3..e • 4 j'I I • ,• I' IL' . ..•*, • . I ;•gi 3 1 f4 • I. . II I • • I • .. s ' i• r.. Jr ,t, • „,,,,•ii, 4./1..,......••%. • . i, r r ..,,)if '>,ii • No.-, b,it 1 :-", • 1 '' ' _:,1, • r�' V' :r'•• ` 4•• yr• � i '.i Y r ' •e ''Asti X. J# ' .' . , f ./ r , -• It '�, iJ w r 4,, • • c f 7. !N /.ir, 4! ; i�C.-- x w lc 1 . \ 4,� .0 t. 'll fd a t y' :,„,ti"%y :�� e ' r• Ait .*� 1, • \ ':.4't 1;.1.4\.14. .• a+ate t_ . + �� '' � � , %. Via. • 4•a_ 4., t •t tL % i�,.. Y `... A. ... ,,.. • ,,.. ,...i...,it .1e.t, 0:4 ti •'.. • .. i'.'1;;. ; _ i'•-' '4't: .div: t L . ‘'-,4l`K. fir•; _ l �l '`y.n •' yyl • 1j 1 • •n � '' t ft jf t • ..;._ ..f ., t iiii:40,,,,,.., Y. ', rl .. , • COLOR TRANSPARENCY A3N311VdSNVI4l 130103 umm•••••=•••••7---- \ 3OL . 1c 9 OF s-1ON (du pit-f ONGIZE1 e - '9140-1OC91\piPi- D C 1 - 2wsa. 02$1** 4X I5X �< 11X MISC r order a ,grid set;of c' Lam_; s . ., . • .7, I voi - C OLO- R- ''''':::: .-'''-!--'1.-'''':.-...- - • :'-': - -' . • !!'t -• SHARE YOUR -_-., , ..._. ._. .'i- gb - MEMORIES 5*=. :%..;.'(_A.�i" _-_ ._ _ ---.._&l— ..--.,,.,.,1. ____-._-- - Subject 5-101\-8)uAf CO 3CJ . co(rroaa� , Place Date M AR-1 22 1 q tb Film Give us ur sh 9cdNTE4 9FJ CXI9 .. N_. a r • imp sn msH issuessen Iva JO.SHA lua!uan i�ji'►' ,uo olo)JOM '�•JO'• sgawnaop 13510 8 'S.,.0 `9Z L `0 i o A pEau `sud sapiis ` , , ,, . :!ilk , n ' Ill ii �► i I u. j I' �, l I :, (ww9�'8 '8 '8Jadns)sanow ino(aa l eauaS a l 01 y APO VE-erP-O S iMON ' , J� t�� niy Id, 1ti 'lI',I II gI hm„.w"'.: . II 1�I11li ii a yi • , uy il'. �,�,IIIlIII^►,ill►flilU •, ►11ll,l'I Ilil ii,,.l�, '.4 r dtp h,u O411 � -. � ii i, a iNp1•ii 1'1�!, . , - (1'-- PAM. aiOUcJ ; • k — T � � • POTERSAREGREATFUN! -a-- : 2c3O. . sik-'4. iif..- These giant color posters make great gifts! `'•_ ) ,r Enlargements from your favorite 35mm �!t� :. .. ,' color negathres or slides! ..... y �� 16X� i�../,A, ; ,r'.i Suitable for framing, these amazing color q j 4 enlargements are available from your ii��� `�, IIVI °;7, favorite 35mm color negative or slide. • /11 a'"I' 41,,, Lr ynL .l..,, Save big on our everyday low price! ;I' i i. Ask us for details. FLOODING SOURCE FLOODWAY BASE FLOOD WATER SURFACE ELEVATION 1 WIDTH SECTION AREA N MEAN VELOCITY REGULATORYI WITHOUT I WITH INCREASE CROSS SECTION DISTANCE (FEET) (SQUARE (FEET PER FLOODWAY FLOODWAY FEET) SECOND) (FEET NGVD) -" Cedar River A 0.025 158 1280 7.7 15.0 15.0 15.0 0.0 B 0.462 144 180 10.0 18.9 18.9 18..9 0.0 _ C 0.767 157 1510 6.5 23.7 23.7 23.7 0.0 D 1.144 156 1020 9.6 25.7 25.7 25.7 0.0 E 1.261 120 950 10.3 27.5 27.5 27.5 0.0 F 1.337 135 1030 9.5 28.5 28.5 28.5 0.0 G 1.489 150 1110 8.8 30.6 30.6 30.6 0.0 H 1.679 114 950 10.3 32.5 32.5 32.5 0:0 I 1.830 135 1180 8.3 35.5 35.5 35.5 0.0 J 1.960 221 1360 7.2 37.3 37.3 37.3 -0.0 K 2.038 135 1280 7.7 38.4 38.4 38.4 0.0 _ L 2.090 115 1210 8.1 39.5 39.5 39.5- 0.0 M 2.160 103 1160 8.5 40.7 40.7 40.7 0.0 N 2.320 110 1490 6.6 43.4 43.4 43.4 0.0 O 2.470 142 1500 6.5 45.2 45.2 45.2 0.0 P 2.730 141 1210 8.1 49.5 49.5 49.5 0.0 Q 2.900 130 1310 7.5 52.6 52.6 52.6 0.0 R 2.960 140 1220 8.1 53.6 53.6 53.6 0.0 S 3.020 150 1070 9.1 55.4 55.4 55.4 0.0 T 3.250 210 1690 5.8 60.9 60.9 61.0 0.1 U 3.370 196 1310 7.5 62.8 62.8 `-62.9 0.1 1Miles Above Mouth FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY FLOODWAY V D�IA MIN Federal Insurance Administration r n R 1 N . " °° CITY OF RENTON, WA rn (KING CO.) . CEDAR RIVER Q BASE FLOOD FLOODING SOURCE FLOODWAY WATER SURFACE ELEVATION SECTION MEAN WITHOUT 1 WITH CROSS SECTION DISTANCE 1 WIDTH AREA VELOCITY REGULATORY FLOODWAY I FLOODWAY INCREASE (FEET) (SQUARE (FEET PER (FEET NGVD) FEET) SECOND) Cedar River A 0.025 158 1280 7.7 15.0 15.0 15.0 0.0 r B 0.462 144 180 10.0 18.9 18.9 18.9 0.0 % C 0.767 157 1510 6.5 23.7 23.7 23.7 0.0 D 1.144 156 1020 9.6 25.7 25.7 25.7 0.0 E 1.261 120 950 10.3 27.5 27.5 27.5 0.0 F 1.337 135 1030 9.5 28.5 28.5 28.5 0.0 G 1.489 150 1110 8.8 30.6 30.6 30.6 -0.0 H 1.679 114 950 10.3 32.5 32.5 32.5 0.0 I 1.830 135 1180 8.3 35.5 35.5 35.5 0.0 J 1.960 221 1360 7.2 37.3 37.3 37.3 0.0 K 2.038 135 1280 7.7 38.4 38.4 '38.4 0.0 L 2.090 115 1210 8.1 39.5 39.5 39.5- 0.0 M 2.160 103 1160 8.5 40.7 40.7 40.7 0.0 N 2.320 110 1490 6.6 43.4 43.4 43.4 0.0 O 2.470 142 1500 6.5 45.2 45.2 45.2 0.0 P 2.730 141 1210 8.1 49.5 49.5 49.5 0.0 Q 2.900 130 1310 7.5 52.6 52.6 52.6 0.0 R 2.960 140 1220 8.1 53.6 53.6 53.6 0.0 S 3.020 150 1070 9.1 55.4 55.4 - 55.4 0.0 T 3.250 210 1690 5.8 60.9 60.9 61.0 0.1 U 3.370 196 1310 7.5 62.8 62.8 62.9 0.1 'Miles Above Mouth - FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY A Federal Insurance Administration FLOODWAY DATA °° CITY OF RENTON, WA rri ," (KING CO.) CEDAR. RIVER / • r0 F „ . ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT r,`,y .Z eel RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR 4 0 w � MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 ® 235-2540 04 7.6O SEPTE.O(C'P BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH CITY NTo g MAYOR P ` tiUG , rr _ ; fi March 12, 1987 DUILDING/ZONING DEPT. • Mr. Richard Padrick 501 Lyon Building Seattle, WA 98104 RE: Stoneway Special Permit for Grade and Fill of 53.000 cu.yd.s at 1915 Maple.Valley Highway Dear Mr. Padrick: The Environmental Review Committee considered your application yesterday at its regular meeting and passed a motion to defer your application pending the submittal of additional information from you regarding: future plans for the site; measures being taken to control erosion, especially during flooding of the Cedar River; source and type of fill materials; traffic impacts on Maple Valley Highway; measures that will be taken to keep debris and dirt off City streets; potential adverse impacts on the City's nearby well system as well as its aquifer; and potential adverse impacts (noise, dust, glare) on the City's adjacent Cedar River Park. At the meeting, Public Works staff noted that a geotechnical engineer should be consulted to review the erosion problem as well as possible impacts on the City's well system. They also indicated that the flood capacity review was not complete enough for them to certify that the fill would not affect the floodway channel. They indicated that "cross sections and hydraulic modeling using HEC-2 programs" should also be done. Information on haul routes, number of trips per day and hours of peak impact should also be provided. As soon as this new information is available, we will be able to proceed with your application. You may wish to talk with Bob Bergstrom in Public Works regarding the erosion problem. If you have any questions, please give me a call at 235-2540. Con9.7), ald K. Eri son, AICP Zoning Administrator 3555Z P� \*x I� (,_• d Hu gh ith & Associates, Inc. #86121 23 April 1987 • Renton Building & Zoning Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Attention: Mr. Donald K. Erickson, AICP Re: Stoneway Special Permit for Grade and Fill of 53,000 cu. yds. at 1915 Maple Valley Highway and Renton letter response dated March 12, 1987 Dear Mr. Erickson, Following is our response to your comments on our referenced special permit. We will address each issue in the order presented in your March 12, 1987 letter. 1. Future plans for the site - Some consideration has been given to the potential use of the site in a very general way. That consideration has been limited to discussions of the possibility of a hotel and small retail use. No effort has been made to evaluate what uses are allowed un- der the code or if there is a market for a hotel/retail use. The fill is being placed to improve the utility of the batch plant site. Future use of the site will be identified some time in the future. 2. Measures being taken to control erosion - The drawings submitted with the special permit application require construction of a filter fabric fence at the ordinary high water mark on the south side of the fill site, parallel to the Cedar River, prior to beginning work. A berm will be con- structed landward of the filter fence to further contain silt laden storm water on site. As material is placed it will be sloped to to a desiltation pond on the north side of the berm. The settling pond will discharge to the Cedar River. These measures will minimize discharge of silt laden storm water runoff to the river. 3. Especially during flooding of the Cedar River - The landscape plan presented on the application drawings was prepared to conform to our under- standing of Park Department and Public Works Department requirements. If the bank needs additional protection from Cedar River flood waters, we will ° armor the berm in a manner similar to the bank along the Park-Cedar River interface, or with other protection satisfactory to all City of Renton Departments. The river mean velocity in the area of the proposed project, 501 Lyon Building / Seattle. Washington 98104 / (206)622-1080 consulting engineers • surveyors • planners Renton Building S. Zoning Department Attn: Mr. Donald Erickson 23 April 1987 Page Two during the 100 year storm, is about 8 fps. The velocity along the bank will be less than 8 fps. Well maintained bermuda grass on the slope will ensure a stable slope during normal flooding. 4. Source and type of fill materials - Source of the material is indeterminate at this time. Material to be used for fill will be primarily excess earth from utility construction jobs in Seattle, Renton, Kent, and King County. Some earth may also come from foundation excavation work for new buildings. The majority of earth in the region is of the Alderwood and Everett types. Alderwood soils compose about 45% of all soils in King County. Everett soils compose another 8% of all soils in King County. Both soils are of the gravelly sandy loam type. The remaining 47% of soils is com- posed of 35 other types, mostly silt loam material. It is likely that some clay silt loam type soils will be placed in the fill. If necessary the applicant will keep records on the origin of all material placed in the fill. 5. Traffic impacts on Maple Valley Highway - The average daily traf- fic on the Maple Valley Highway at the batch plant site is about 26,600 vehicles, based on an actual Washington State Department of Transportation traffic count in 1985 of 25,065 vehicles.1 Of that total about 520 are heavy trucks, i.e. trucks hauling gravel, concrete, and solid waste. We estimate that there will be an average of 35 trucks per day arriv- ing at the site to dump material in the fill area. Peak traffic is esti- mated to be 50 trucks per day. Peak daily truck traffic arriving at the fill site amounts to 0.38% of the total average daily one way traffic on the Maple Valley Highway. Generally, total traffic volume impacts of 3 percent or less are not noticeable to most drivers. The proposed new temporary truck traffic is about 6% of the existing heavy truck traffic. 6. Measures that will be taken to keep debris and dirt off City streets - Stoneway trucks have added side boards to their trucks to help keep material in the truck. All trucks have mud flaps which are cleaned regularly. All loads are within legal limits. Some of the trucks arriving at the fill site. will be owned by private dirt movers and will not be under the strict control of the applicant. If necessary, trucks will dump their material at the edge of the fill area to minimize the opportunity to track dirt out to the Maple Valley Highway. Trucks leaving the fill area must cross several hundred feet of con- crete pavement before they enter SR169. Any dirt on the vehicle wheels 1 Phone conversation with Dave Oberg, Washington State Department of - Transportation, April 6, 1987. 0 Hugh G.Gofdsrmith &Associates,Inc. (. ., Renton Building & Zoning Department Attn: Mr. Donald Erickson 23 April 1987 Page Three should be cleaned off before the trucks reach SR169. As a mater of routine the concrete hardstands on the batch plant site are kept clean. It may be possible to give a specification sheet to all non-Stoneway truck drivers outlining minimum requirements to haul through the City of Renton and into the Stoneway site. 6. Potential adverse impacts (noise, dust, glare) on the City's ad- jacent Cedar River Park: Noise - Noise studies done in the vicinity of the Cedar River Park/Stoneway Batch Plant by the Washington State DOT show the following: Noise levels south of the Maple Valley Highway centerline for PM peak hour traffic: Distance Noise From Centerline Levels 200 feet 66 dbA 500 feet 61 dbA 700 feet 59 dbA 1000 feet 57 dbA Noise levels from construction equipment at specified distances is: 50 feet 100 feet 200 feet 400 feet Dump Truck 86 80 74 68 Bulldozer 80 74 68 62 Worst case noise impact on the park will occur when the construction equipment is filling the park property. From a technical perspective the Maple Valley Highway noise level is insignificant relative to the noise level of equipment constructing the fill. Consequently, the noise level shown in the chart above can be considered the worst case noise level. Following completion of the fill, the Park Department might choose to reconstruct the existing berm as a visual/noise barrier of the batch plant site. Occasionally, and intermittently, equipment will move through the fill area, following completion of the fill. As previously stated, it is intended that the use of the newly filled area continue to be a staging area for equipment and material. Dust - Material placed in the fill area will contain some water. Material placed with a water content too low to prevent dust will be watered during 2 Phone conversation with Bruce Farar, Washington State Department of _ Transportation, April 8, 1987. 0 Hugh G.Goldsmith &Associates. Renton Building & Zoning Department Attn: Mr. Donald Erickson 23 April 1987 Page Four placement •and compaction to minimize the creation of airborne dust par- ticles. Prevailing winds are typically from the west (S.W. or N.W.) and normally will help keep spurious dust from settling in the park. Glare - All the operations. will occur during the day and no lights will be used during the filling operation. Therefore, the project will not create glare. 7. The erosion problem - the. erosion issue was covered in item 2 above. 8. Possible impacts on the City's well system - The Well Field Pro- tection Study prepared for the City of Renton in August, 1984 by CH2MHILL addressed several issues related to the Stoneway Batch Plant. None of the issues considered filling a portion of the site. However, the report did indicate that "The water table within the aquifer is generally at or near the elevation of the water surface in the Cedar River." By filling the site about ten feet the applicant would be more than doubling the amount of cover currently provided over the aquifer in the proposed fill area. When the filling operation is completed the finished surface will be hard and relatively impervious to infiltration and percolation. The highly compacted fill will also act as a barrier to horizontal mitagation of pol- lutants from upstream of the fill site. The fill will also keep polluted flood water separated from the water table to a greater degree than pro- vided now. Since the proposed use of the fill area is continuation of the exist- ing use, the overall affect of placing the fill is seen to be a positive one relative to protection of the City's water supply. 9. .. .that the fill would not affect the floodway channel - Cedar River data used to generate the new FEMA maps was obtained from CH2MHILL. A new cross-section was added to the existing data at the location of the proposed fill. The HEC 2 program was then run to obtain new flood information based on the proposed fill. A report of the flood plain analysis is attached for your review. The attachments include a map showing the location of the cross-section, a print of a portion of the new draft FEMA map by CH2MHILL showing the study cross section location, computer print outs showing the before fill and after fill flood plain elevations, and a written report describing the analysis procedure. The conclusion reached in the study is that the fill will not affect the elevation of the 100 year flood plain. 0 HughG.Goldsmith &Associates,Inc. Renton Building & Zoning Department Attn: Mr. Donald Erickson 23 April 1987 Page Five 10. Information on haul routes - Since no sources of fill material have yet been identified it is not possible to describe haul routes to the proposed fill site. At best, it can be stated that the material will originate at locations within the economic haul distance from the propsed project site. Material generated outside the economic haul distance will be taken to other approved fill sites. Potential material sources are ex- pected to be within a radius of 8 to 10 miles from the fill project. Generally, dump trucks use major highways and freeways to transport their loads. Use of local access streets is usually limited to that needed for access to the source of the material. 11.. Number of trips per day - It is anticipated that there will be an average of four to five trucks per hour arriving at the site during the work day. It is possible that as many as seven trucks per hour will arrive at the site during peak times. 12. Hours of peak impact - The nature of the anticipated sources of material (i.e. , utility construction projects and foundation excavations) dictate that the truck traffic will be relatively uniform during the con- struction workday, roughly 7 AM to 4 PM. The applicant requested the permit be issued for..7.,.AM.. to 8 PM Monday through Saturday to provide the flexibility to work overtime if necessary during the summer construction - season. Work would be suspended during evening hours if it conflicted with scheduled evening activities at the Cedar River Park. If additional information is needed to enable the City to complete processing of the grade and fill application, please contact me. Very truly yours, HUGH G. GOLDSMITH & ASSOCIATES, INC. Richard D. Padrick, P.E. RDP:sar Enclosures cc: Don Merlino O &`A '�s c'G�attes,i DS/FD�O � I.\�J�UCC �' i • ik /.1\*1 CITY OF RENTON ,,,,, DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE 4 6 (MITIGATED) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO. : ECF-005-87 APPLICATION NO(S) . : 'SP-005-87, SM-002-87 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for special permit to allow the filling and grading on 3.88 acres of property with approximately 53,000 cubic yards of material in order to bring the property to grade with the remainder of the site, and substantial shorelines development permit to allow said fill and grading within 200 feet of Cedar River. PROPONENT: Stoneway Concrete and City of Renton Parks and Recreation Department LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Directly north of Cedar River at 1915 Maple Valley Highway. LEAD AGENCY: , City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2) (c) . This decision was made after review of an expanded environmental checklist and preliminary site plan, on file with the lead agency. Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-2822(D) Renton Municipal Code (see attached sheet) . These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340. 7 The lead agency will not act on this proposal for fifteen (15) days from June 25, 1987. Any interested party may submit written comments which must be submitted 1 by 5:00 p.m. , July loth in order to be considered. -- This Determination may be appealed by 5:00 p.m. on July 10th. Any appeal must be submitted in writting stating clearly reasons for revising the Determination and must be accompanied by a non-refundable $75.00 filing fee. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 235-2500 DATE OF DECISION: June 10, 1987 EFFECTIVE DATE: June 26, 1987 ' 'c „Ronald G. Nelson L y Sp ger 'Building and Zoning Director Policy ve ment Director Richard � Houghton Public W rks Director DS/Dskl • StonwyMM CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE MITIGATION MEASURES ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO.: ECF-005-87 APPLICATION NO(S) .: SP-005-8. , SM-002-87 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for special permit to allow the filling and grading on 3.88 acres of property with approximately 53,000 cubic yards of material in order to bring the property to grade with the remainder of the site, and substantial shorelines development permit to allow said fill and grading within 200 feet of Cedar River. PROPONENT: Stoneway Concrete and City of Renton Parks and Recreation Department LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: CONDITIONS: 1. Haul routes and hours of operation .1 to be approved by Public Works, Policy Development, Parks and Recreation, and the State Department of Transportation. - 2. All fill materials to be certified as to their cleanliness by a certified professional engineer. 3. Hours of filling are to be coordinated with the Parks and Recreation Department. / or 4. The north river bank is to be rip- 1 rapped to the 100-year flood plain elevation. J. LL (5 A fifteen (15) foot maintenance/ 1 - C't'•J)I v6do access easement parallel to the et-i edar River is to be granted to th- City which could function as an `d``v1 eventual link between the Cedar - 1LC✓ River Park and residential areas to the east. (6. !Additional conifers and evergreen `✓/ shrubbery should be added to buffer the adjacent Cedar River Park. DS/Dskl ECF00587 CITY OF RENTON • DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO.: ECF-005-87--- APPLICATION NO(S) . : j SP-005-87, SM-002-87 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: (\ Application for special permit to --allow_the filling and grading on 3.88 acres of property with approximately 53,000 cubic yards of material in order to bring the property to grade with the remainder of the site, and substantial shorelines development permit to allow said fill and grading within 200 feet of Cedar River. PROPONENT: Stoneway Concrete and City of Renton Parks and Recreation Department LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Directly north of Cedar River at 1915 Maple Valley Highway. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it .does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2) (c) . This decision was made after review of an expanded environmental checklist and preliminary site plan, on file with the lead agency. Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-2822(D) Renton Municipal Code (see attached sheet) . These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340. The lead agency will not act on this proposal for fifteen (15) days from August 3, 1987. Any interested party may submit written comments which must be submitted by 5:00 p.m., August 17, 1987, in order to be considered. This Determination may be appealed by 5:00 p.m. on August 17, 1987. Any appeal must be submitted in writting stating clearly reasons for revising the Determination and must be accompanied by a non-refundable $75.00 filing fee. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 235-2500 . DATE OF DECISION: July 29, 1987 EFFECTIVE DATE: August 3, 1987 -t AC Ilkiarg Ronald G. Nelson i.':r '• . Spr.i ger Building and Zoning Director PoliL Deve lct•ment Director -4,g/ ,4e. „ Ridhard �C� oug o Public Wo s Director DS/Dskl StonwyMM • CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE MITIGATION MEASURES ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO.: ECF-005-87 APPLICATION NO(S) .: SP-005-87, SM-002-87 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for special permit to allow the filling and grading on 3.88 acres of property with approximately 53,000 cubic yards of material in order to bring the property to grade with the remainder of the site, and substantial shorelines development permit to allow said fill and grading within 200 feet of Cedar River. PROPONENT: Stoneway Concrete and City of Renton Parks and Recreation Department LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: CONDITIONS: 1. Haul routes and hours of operation to be approved by Public Works, Policy Development, Parks and Recreation, and the State Department of Transportation. 2. All fill materials to be certified as to their cleanliness by a certified professional engineer. 3. Hours of filling are to be coordinated with the Parks and Recreation Department. 4.)'A landscape/erosion buffer easement having a minimum width of 30 feet from the mean water level of the Cedar River and a northern setback distance determined by the drip line of existing trees along the river's edge and running the full width of the western portion of the site from the western boundary (abutting Cedar River Park) east to the existing sedimentation pond is to be provided to visually screen the industrial uses on the site ./ from recreational uses along the Cedar River as well as to create an erosion buffer from Cedar Rivers) flooding; 5. Because of the fragile natural environment of the landscape buffer, fill materials shall be retained by earthern berms • • beginning behind the landscape buffer; NOTE: If ecology blocks are used as a retention device for the proposed fill, they shall be bermed along their river side and shall be setback a minimum distance of 15 city or Renton Determination of Non- ignificance Mitigation Measures Page 2 feet from the landscaped buffer easement identified in item 4. ' above. 6. iAll bermed areas shall be landscaped with evergreen trees and plants as well as soil retained evergreen ground cover; and 7: Additional conifer and evergreen shrubbery shall be planted in the landscape/erosion buffer easement for erosion control as well as to create an aesthetic visual screen of heavy industrial uses on the site. r -- ____ _ _ 0 © CITY OF REN' tir r � `, — BUILDING & ZONING DEP. :M ar. =': 1S87 i . — 0' 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washingt MAI. 50 140915Ni. 1.0/09/E17 Lam "-/...-ia. RETURN TO SENDER NO FORWARDING c (ORDER ON FILE UNABLE TO FORWARD • _ I Ilj 813020-0730-09 !� MAINWARING PAUL E0680 1150 SUNSET BLVD NE 0117 RENTON WA , 98055 ,,�• ,' 7_ (fi t NG DEPT. B ---...„,........_ . . Ai a 0 CITY OF RENTON • 4.7-‘. PM i . '11' IDC.1 1,11 I BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT co e.. STAMP COL, -1-'1' el 19 OCT 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 ' or.i......--2......--e-• ROT' ;r Li -1/2 1 J.3N.1. "" RETURN TO SE NI)1 i::I L_ i. i •:71 2 CA*1-1 '---) . JOHN F ROTTER t NO FORWARDING ORDER ON FaLE: ‘...,, - 13620 SE 100TH LINABLE TO FORWrf:41:;:D . . . RENTON, WA. 98056 .v\Sv/ii1 177:,,,, , •"IELIVERABLE<------'s---„ . I A DDRESSED I UN. E TO FORWARD . I REi •,'IN TO WRITER L'A t NI) 7.i 01 Co .1.-. A • kl.' A HE/dskl 101387 CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER • PUBLIC HEARING OCTOBER 13, 1987 AGENDA COMMENCING AT 9: 00 A.M. : - COUNCIL CHAMBERS, SECOND FLOOR, RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING The applications listed are in order of application number only and not necessarily the order in which they will be heard. Items will be called for hearing at the discretion of the Hearing Examiner. BOEING COMMERCIAL AIRPLANE COMPANY (Continued) Application for a conditional use permit to allow minor modifications to the existing wastewater treatment facilities and the addition of new facilities to expand the capabilities of the existing plant. The applicant is also applying for a shoreline substantial development permit for the project. Property located north of Airport Way and west of Logan Avenue S. in the vicinity of the Cedar River. File Nos. : SM-007-86, CU-007-87. PUBLIC STORAGE, INC. Application for conditional use permit to build a mini-storage warehouse on 2 . 388 acres and application for short plat of two (2) lots. Property located at N.W. quadrant of Edmonds Avenue N.E. and Sunset Blvd. N.E. File Nos. : ECF-019-87, CU-021-87, SH PL-022-87. CRAFTSMAN HOMES, INC. Application to rezone approximately 9.96 acres of property from G-1 to R-1 and application . for preliminary plat to subdivide the subject property into 44 single family lots and application for variance to allow two pipestem lots. Property located on the west side of Duvall Avenue N.E. between the 1800 and 2100 blocks. File • Nos. : ECF-036-87, R-039-87, PP-040-87, V-041-87. D D • • .. •' . - ems — �. a - —r + .. ,•r q it.7 r � . ! i . 1 ! !Ps ' ' II__—_ ,I 1 •; I n I / %, \ o ; ; .; — I ,? �! 7 ,` ' ' 'u . I w ° • • t TOY ni - '.1 ,,5(/-' � l I ,( IInoi �)' • ` c 66II ti 1 1 f.• q� y r- y ,I „ p .11y'�• _._ 1 Y :t1.41(C1.)-/Ps'il:1111f.4D5-j .. .. 7 t.' Eo{ )- • q.1.,l� T'1 ;t .F�'� •.!yrn Zt'1„\ s ! 5 , S :i , +�1 /rt { I •- -- ,` _ o , _ r—_-- -_.---� t — y . , w •x .� ,r. Sa I— I . , .�, i ' )j \.. PAPv � ,, 1 i J �____J L Ip \ ' n�,.,s, l ,,, .. .__ • r •—1 f ' i ' I 1''I g ' --- t.. _t--•r 1 �� 1 j I i I 1 t — 1 \ ........,,____ � IJ 71 + `/ ! ni 1 1. E. I.1 . .?s. . 1(,' . .vr_j____ r ,,,• ' j• ' ! i ,, ii iE 6y,L--.-- ----, — . . ,. .. ., 1.7, i ,... it 7 , . ct; lir--11": I '— 1. . I , ...---::‘li 1,--7,7, . ii--. 1:__:___. • .n .•„ ':A, , ,7 �J.,-, {, r1 '.._,- '0 Z 11 I P® 11 " `::, N 'n u 6 0.)`' S T• a 1 1 a 7 �J �i i I'�t , , _. 1 a iu - IS. 0 �y in- rF ,,,, 7-7).f ‘......'17:''''NN‘,.. i L______.: r, '-.1--, - _TT - I .' m , 0 ^ i 4/ R C , "" �,� .."!1: U? v n j �� II L / 1 nape , , _ ( /" 41-3' '''''''s."-?------‹; I. .//,./ Bt...., i , . „.., - 1 ..,t, ,,, , I/ i (.) . 9-3' 1 i \ \! ( ---....,...----: [ ,v . ,_. , ..,.' \/.\..!..,.:, 1 ‘, • ..... i . . , / / ,,..).[;-,--..,,i)F,J.— ,.,: :. -1 '..,.\\,. ''':-„., '1, ,Q 4? ' , . /...., . , I ../2.1,I 1-1, , __ j i . � I 1 lEll n ./ i J � o "I , . 1.aL. " r—, t '1E11 - ` ,/ • � 11 — f , _l \ - - --- ., t - �FF``/r` ,•',`i1� T I �� ' 1-`,- � Y� `I.,I,crgC,,` n 1}}�,, ,----It: 1� i3 J !,• R-3 / t-1 ram, 1 I. ,.i,i „ `. r, \ r'�6'en a--in �i. �:t -.< ..aa..•...L*- _ • PUBLIC STORAGE INC. ji: II MINI WAREHOUSE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - AND SHORT PLAT ECF -019-87 • CU-021-87, SH PL-022-87 APPL I CANT Public Storage Inc. TOTAL AREA 2.388 acres PR I NC I PAL ACCESS Edmonds Avenue N.E. EXISTING ZONING R-3, medium density multi-family, B-1, Business Use EXISTING USE Vacant • PROPOSED USE Mini Warehouse COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Medium Density Multi-family COMMENTS Y,.r.+.x.,......«+..•... ..,.. +_.,.„,. .w w. .—n.w..•r,—.•.._•,..n. ,,.w•.«. .•w.. •.w.«..., n»...w.,n w«.......+..w.a... v.. ... ...a. .— w. a._.n.. ..r • <, .,.n. • .1 ..- C .'• 'In rf I SE 68"ST \-/---/ • Iiii4 , . -... '. .... 4 0.47.•, •••-A-4 ... A A,..., A 'O....A* 0.0.1•*'. , . • 10004 4.'04 • 1 OVA% LAND USE ELEME T „:„.....0.0.0., ... t • .- ,.. vim inamml ,........ , • Single Family . i mmmmm 1! ' Cemmercoal .. .,„ , ..„.,1 7 4 \ 1110ti. ,.. . 1 s, 76 u ST . , . . t. ;.... . , Low Density :::::* ::•::::::. , Offic,-. / *Vice Park i. . ........ . . ..... „ ..... ..... ,...... ..... .... _ .',,_ " ..... • 1 009.0000%.0°, .:::::::::: ._ -I i ( Mediurri Densoty ,.,000... Public/ 0"uasi-Pbloc ..:.:.::,:. ..3.,'• :::::::::::::::::::::::::::' Mt -Famy ullil ,....... - .......................... 00...... . . k•o C'e,..7 41 N \ gh o Density m ,,, •,,,` •00•....., . . ,...... .• oght industrial 4, Multi-Faily '°°°°°°., L '....1 7. l X.... ;• • •, • --•—•—'-- • . ' S 6 , e :000000 Ht,avy Industrial , Recreation .30. 0 • . :-..,..., ,....,.€., .._, f,....,:,,,,.....-5.,,,i. .. •••WI'•-••..-• ',•, ....-.-_,..,..c:;::::::I..:..!:;::::•::I-I:,,..,f.::l...‘;;':'... • •, Greenbelt ! •!-,..z,,,, ,.“' . c r ---,„ ..„.,, :p 4•L...•.;.;•••r,. ' "•'''t•f:'':•01.=-en'•*•,*,..-ic. -4 0.;0 • 7 n"• .'.7';..i. ,. f „„ ,.. ,, r•,,, -...-..,....,,,..,..cite-ix . . . ••-•0•-..4.,4.••••472. .,•• • ..; *-.,re"4 I.?. .•.77.'4: C...'F,..•....e.e.•-—-- - -- " ' "--" - -- .---'----'----"'"'.-*"'-""-'6611.64.isir 1 - - -.. -'-rr.e.`•;,`....:irel. ....,.;-'s." ez,f•,., 4.,,.,;'..721 Revised. April 1985 8.,%,', \ ,,1.6.....=6041 1 .I,P,Assitcr.f.t,....‘;'- . :?e-.5.0:-e.-..,:-.,:4;. •.-4...;. ,.-.... .,7,.r.-..-.i..;;:::,.;;.;..::-."...-.z1.^,i,:,..,-,,;,i;-.-....;s-::,:•:-•.••.":....-c. IIP .e...,,.,‘:•,.t • '('-'`-',!cg•.°• `." .•„'-ve.'-'••••••':•:::::35:1011-' ' "`-•. ,, '',.qi,..6,4,&--.;:,.. 4,:,(6.v:.„ , •• . . , .F.".'.'4•;;;;•••i:"; -... ', ' --= % . ., . . ''...S. 'IN - _i_ .. .. • ,\,,, :. ,,..8 ... ....00., 1 , °•,4t ,,V, - , 1 — . • •Zr: .. ft, ',.;., • 1 . A t*'S- --, ...... • .... •'-' - ti. '. i\e,' .',' • D •.:c.•c.,..-•••••• , ____ ' • t. i. !!.', ..:.::.:: . . ••••: •••...y'::.r,:.: It i ,', it 1 1,17,(C., r. , ::•:::;::::i:;.:4:;:4::.;::::"..4"-;:i'll. :1/— • LAKE - -,, ,—. :....: • ..... , • , .::.-111ziA.••••••1.-r,6! ')':' • ',z• -- . — ‘.... , ..A.;;;;;;; i.:,/ . ,,e: !,::.,,..,.:,,, , .. S :itir' ., i:voivh.•:.:::::i,!. .. - • .., .::...,zo: •,..:.,:i....1.:: , „.. S -r, WA -H-I-N G TO N , ,,,. Q .. ,...4e,,,. • , . •,..•c,...:•.: ,...... --,fli :::.:::.:::: . :•:::*i*i*"..7' -• ••• , ...: I••( N ,e'..,''•-1Z., .' ' ; !•,7.147.!: ri.(.1:41 .::. :'; ::::::i.:11:1( .0 \ , .1. .: .::. .... aar, : •:. . - ••• ,,-.1.,..,;., 'i, 1 VAP,:,°., ... ,i:.. :::: Paigt •-., ° .9.Q.1. 1,.; 1 tr‘ -.• la. •oc,..,/ :•:„, ar, ilk, $ • 0 ci.c'...4;32..-:i. "t 1,,', `e ' • 0 Q e • ' ' , .: -1-,z; _ ' ''''' 1-;;.;.•::::,:::::::•:•::::::::*::::i** i ri !!!! •:::, III 11111 '- 1111111S. al 0000000 ,,,, ,,. .,•::,.:*-:::.:i*::.:.:.:- 4' . 5-i* 1111L ,... 1111111111NN ' .44-•V ° ° ° ° ° ° °0 'ii.';:. ;`.',' :iii:i:;,......,pr,-...„.....,,5'.....::::::::i:i:::: 4 Atria ii .,•:: 11111111111111 ,•-• .4, 000000000000.,0 0. ,,:•, .., ::•:••••••:::::i*.::me.vvoiv:*1.i*:i:i:::iiii::i .,,irumorses,1 ... • MIMI 1 ' ;;,c):.7.-•,•,7-,..-- torror0000000000000 0.0300066:i, ,,:.'...,-,,.. ...,i..:3:•.iii Allifil :.::.:!:::5,•2457*iii,:r...F._,„k r ...- ) III, It tgg2,:v :7100000r, .,.,. .,., mon 1101:: •gogogog... ,,. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o No o 0 •, ,, ::::::::::::::. , ,,,i„4.;:..:.;.::.:::,,,rtei co's.• 9 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0\ 0 0 • ‘ :•:::::•::: wggggogogo, 1, 000000o0o0o000 ,.., ,. i t°4:0*, El li.•g g g 0 s 0 g:.,,.:,0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 \0 0 0,,s, ! ::iiii• 101 :i•AIN li ' 7,4 ,...„..z.,2.. im. vogogogogq,',..t 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4..,.. ... .ii:.:.,It'MIN -1 --_:-- 1 i . siiiiiimin ,...,t,zgo00202,,oggog...ts40 . 't ggggeggg:.tU914210''90°O. 0°0°0°0C 0°0°0j°0°0°0',"!:':Anil t.60" • 4 0 0 .$0 : : .100_00___bp_ 04,,• ,,...„1.:1, Mile . ' Mr= .o000000,9:0.>IP 0 0 0 0 '0 0 0 0 0 vi 0 0 0 0 ,:• . . IIIIM , 00000000 A 0000000 00 4 0000000001;i, • 0000r" .1‘' `. 4 0000Cic2 ,k..... .,..„;\ OM= .:-:::,.. -ri;4:0gogo....,..,1• 0 0 0 0 I,..o.0,..•,. ,,, . 0 0 0 0 0 ,5?,.7• ,.!•1"'.'5. 1 •0 • :::".::::: ''•°0 '-:.•:..... •On• :.:.-: ''"..: a ..,..-:,..,aLia 43,,,gomog..1.• o %0 c:, .ta.D..c..,,,...m....a..,..000000e.,•;:,. . , ::.::•-• .v. .-.:,.,--..--1-,.c : .-,......-74.1. ,0g020gogos),.. • • ..° . .,.."k, il, 0 0 0 P 0 rr- '•,011 , ,°0'''':K•\ .0000000600c .•f.i., , ; ...3., . ,_,- .. . , :.::;!..wpogegogogo,,,q,,.. 0 0 , :.?§,e.:::.,>.E.# ) 0,...,0 0 •c4,/ 0 i 41''' iii.' ,, P ...;',.ill:,?ggOg))g'OVS...k.', .'"4.'2:., AMIII/ ''' C),0°.;?' 0°Aq '.1.. 4t4,.c _ 1.. . ...1....:•::::::::::::.:::::...:...:,. •_ •...,.., . :.:.:.:.......,....•....:.•.:.:....::::.,. . __.. k :•":...%g.3,3g2.ggggg• ,‘-..,s, gc.,6,. ,,.:iiii:: 4 I ' 4i7' ! ° '. ) - '' o o o o 9 Q CLQ••"•,,j40.4,A , ,/- ,.2.442 _ ..,. _ ., —, • t lia,i i 717,,,.i.:::rN,,,,,,,, ,i:::iiii.:::: 1..".::, ?,.,,...::::::: :;:::::.>„:i.i.i:i.i.i:i::::.:- 00,::%. •iii ocToca°,16%,Vc‘. ---i :iliiit:,i2E2,9,0go.2020;-.2 •-, 000,14 I si , r „. . 54., ,,,,,.. .•05.„...0... . , go:., ,„„ (—) • :•,.::::i::.:i::i:i*::•,••: „......:::::: 093.00....... 09,00.0.......m, •3 , .._....; _i_,. ,,, . , . ::,,i"v•• .;• .:::::::::::"" ...::::::::::::::::. 00.0.0.0.0.0.00.(00.0.0.0c6vow itiii:iii4,10,p,.-10,i,i.?,...,:, ,,,,, iz,,,,,linggir :,...1..„A "W ' 00 li: ,::::iii..,:•:',i - ••••;......••••••••:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:• 00. . 00......0„ , 1 ,e • •1 • g ' an 000o0o0o0o.o o c<\'' 7.0°''' 'I .•:•:• 1.'"' .11 x."'':,''''''. ' .... •••'•:::::':':•""":•: °93°o°o°o°o°o%o o o o o o o o o o. .., .0000000000000gogO'4-,. ,•g• 1,111 I::::: '.:.' - ' ° .Z.,11,',:;,'ef.—:Mi,IM: ::::W. °°0°013OVONos°o%UoVaVo` ) .1CH\ , ime.0 0.0 0.0.0,.0°000.?,• , ; °,i Aug '!@ 4 .:::.:: ; -..) • -.. ..-... ::::::::::::::::...... oci,o. 0 „ . ,. ./.:.:.::...:::-:'-- •i. ... :::::::::::::::::: ::::::::: :i 00 000-.000.00.°000°0-.000.°000. ;, 00 c, ' • 1:1,, . c,,,c,,3 cu..114.,„ Riq ,_.-...- , .:,., .:., 0.0), ., :,:„„„„„,,,:„„„„„,:,::: ,0000.0.0000.0%.0..00...0..00.4„,,„,,, . . .. .„. ll ni.,...s...,;•,,L. „.40,- ,, / .., _ 0 0.09.0.0.0) :: ::::::i:i.:::::i:i:i: i:: -42,--, 0....„..,;,, ,..t _ ., ‘,....,,i-..--. i...•:...7: um,306060,-,360,50 i,. a dijk.,-.1. ,s;,,,,,,...., .. /I/ci:n?\,, y. i 000000J,-,, /.., •::•::::::i:i::i:•:i:iiii:., . 00.000000000000., ,. • '''"....` tr'•:.: ::. ''' t.1_46: c', g'g °,2.(,),,°) : \411iiink ,',..k4'..•,,,ILC: z'' er5/;•,‘ ".' \,... .-- t I • . - ..bi'.'.. 4', '.....,. ,:•-_- 4 :' '.1 .1C.Cl. '.;•;,7(t N•(s.:,.(::\ .." .c.0' ... • , .. 0000007O, , 000000, 0 ,:7:1,3:.,F.s.••"; 4,1412 ri r .• t . ....; -I . 4. : . . I ' . !•%'i k :*i:i:::!*i;i:X:i: .1,' •,';,,J ':',.",',!,,• I I . ' '.. tl '' i:::i:i:::i:i::*:*i:. .,.,'[.•-•;•;:?;',Psr5'.;.;1'•':"/Pl.'.::.i•0 •••' .; .'.;.1 . 1"' I' • • --....., '..? •' -''- -- 'I'i....11...!, .., ' : .. ,i..., ___ •...' •...; ; ''•''',r1-1:0,-' '-f.'";:e.9;•-/ ' . . I. ' m:.... .;-;•'•• ,7 :'''..,:, ::' 'r.,.".1:::• .' ] .. l::.:.: -•''''.(cC.i...!:•.;.tgr."-1:.(*C(141::1-;f:I.': ;:i.;'"%11:1.N.4'::;:.1.4.:: :1;-;''.. "1, 1,..j.:<::. "..:•.?,.!?!.;t5';r.d.N.:.',,',./e. il Pt.6,-, ;•',•'9.r,, .,• .,1 ri 0,.:,, . , .:.: .: :--1 \ i• ..,.. .,. ...,,„:k..,....kr:.,,,,i,ixef....:,,r:,;. ilitz!z-i.;=,?..,-,31...,.=:,4-..,,y.;0..n.,- - ,,,,,,,....-7...-i,y,,,;:,,.,..,:.:.. , •7- • : . .::::::—. -\\. ,,.... .. . ......::::::: i '' ... ii i , ••;,,...\--.-./..,1,-...,.4-f:-?...,:-.. ;,...1:r,'„..:„;,..--;.'('''" . „,_.. , ',:',F./...,;!...r7,,,.„, . ; ' i , ' .r i . ...:,,,..1.......i.••^__,., t Alt try. , '"Sik ''::. '• .1 '..1•.'• ';:(.)'T'7 1 i'•-,'\4_ ""....... •,'CrstP•ki: ',,, *11... ' P/140 . • ••?....a;., ,i 1 :! ' I ' ''•'-'•;,..;'....rir,, i'Q.,, ,. r....A.Y7;11474::• ',4,,,, . '• 1 \ ..e.,.,,,;,s::;,.-,,,c2,- .-.. •6--,-,. '. .. ntli, 4 -r %;...:e1;:at;1.:::';)"!1;C;..*,;.);:C..ze,:z...4",77i,))...k.1:%1`111;•'':;:•......11y:7',°"ta:ik.;:e..":?!,.(-1.i.7tiell:T...,,,,....\'''.,::-.. ‘ •C-..*.::‘:"1. 11111.-`11:"--r-rf: ". ..,, ,.. • i •_. • :.•::::: ...• , ,.• - • .. ,,. .,i• N-- Ott/co in-7 -- ....... , . - - I: • - .-.1, . a t. , , k-, ! . ; • I ' ::;'. ,;.,,. dillir . e),),,,,. 000.:. 1:30,.:-.Gilk,„,/:1,-;02.mig,1.0,-;.;,,,,,A....2„, N •. ,.J 6 c 0 000000 '.1 •0,.n A• 0•6,,ip.<11,...6•1,.; etr 0.. '' "V% • 1 . .??., .itit. -,;',, ii.i•-•f - 00 •,t,....V.; ";.:1.743.6 CY•SeeS'ciP‘f '=::&:, :0-0,-.E.KN. ', _:. ,..., „, ,, ...,. 4 .. • .,. i C4P/M0 - " i'...i'I:S. i'''111 I I: • .: - s•ft., o o 1,4 44e. ° ;IA,(0 tt..,(.,••tb,0 .?; ,,•(.,.a,c,,.c., . NI,CL„„pt.::: _ . , ,c, ,,....,,...9. ,...,:‘, ,., . %.OE qi•.• ..i41‘'..7.(1. •ves.t•t: .,;:llf:,t‘:pn,'.1,;:tri,isn, ,,Z.,...r,,,?..,•prt$:„.',.,..,:,."‹).„. .;`,^txr,,;;.v".:. kr..i "a ' \ 1 . "••••t•t,f•„...,C.,'•,' ..,,,, •-'4°It".• 1.7;',7,.0,*0.1 P•'01••:Al•k?Or.°V.s.., el.,.t,'a,.. , 1 - - ..."•" r.i A ;4 44 4-1. •- .‘. :::.::::!::.:.' '',';'.1.... . . ..„....:..e.-•^,':'. '41.:::):LY,te,-,.,...°,11•_':::.i.-Aci•••••;:.:.';0.‘..1...,-,e,'..4...;V,,-;',...it,',...0...ca.z,,:i; .. :., • _._. Y:yit''�rr.l; `: - "a5',._, \Y, :. ee"1:{- '. • . .,... .� -Y: - '.; .,-•�,v!. Y.s••:.:sib ';de^�:.'- _li _ ._ _ _• S ! :Z':•�Y `tom.- :i'.54 Y?9+:: `-'. , s • 4l.ti -- -• _ _ of 4a Rte ram ear ea _ r. ^,.. '•tt! • "`' a..'-r et `�a','3.',:. RENTON PUBLIC' STORAGE SHORT PLAT _'t` '; _, ° t � :Ir.,: ..Ar! • •• - = - 0. • I • l. .iymrSE `� • a . - a, 'i ,K4T5.TA'er� - �ba Sa4 JL{� k !i.`✓15rCa!! I� E{.Y'OAG]0�,1'�N.r1Cr , - 4Tnr+iV i� -�i*. _ 'i;r�-,+fir•-.zF_t n' _ SZ�- �� >t .® - EDEIONDSV@.d7.G •-as+er--- a.l „ re x..ee �ra,7 rren5 �".�' ,t3't�''Y :'t,.t5i?v ti r " o ,is } ,- , ,.. ,�--] - -ram -�— . - :�1A" - a� N— --:wv;:=1;:r.'..:‘3.• $9 - - ;r•F� `=� _ _ �p Y p Sp _ t� ..., of �1 ,��s�//mod! 'ue. ... \ / IE z �� � ,� p q • -y —���� 4xs I/ 00 Q F`-h ... -1 - •aiy`ir^' N" fd Y O_.P 0-� E[`��P\/�� _ 9 _ 1 0 es- 021 •b �,y � '• a� _ .F tW.a• -9 Cy �� F ^�M1\'4 r•(.� _ ai :: filid,!.,-.�['t.•}_ 'VI 7jy�7��� / 4�.` '4 4 d': d (�/'•i• 6° �O° -./ �ean _ i,c9. :t' • . '[ ':t_'.A 3 c3-:.�.•1 ..5•�� .r '' '—•Ps- •���� �' G 9 1 - .N i - y� d �_ /"il :.C� c. �� / / j R '�••tla ty„ -'Y: • ,s,�^'1. • ..s. -•: - _ :�:F t'�.. K`C' 'ra:' IFV.,.. ?veil / �—-.J /do. efr t !� i� i;;.r, • .:t. . .,> y :''s;• --FPS42 00 �� PT4\. x mr u�l ,iK1,y,,ry;[i`i -.; ,•.�, =*°"; t,,r•7^ "'•`p r's`'•:i .. i 1 �n— .2ic.', _. :sTa, •,.ts, .osh�/ /_ /-_ �� / ,y° "fir T, ;:fr .`•a,:•r , .` _ rc '4- r. 'r, n a di.�; 11:` .•f-_• c d' =szfz-e` r"'r rJ �.— -y - kq -_c u s+:'t'`� �C pp— - —•—d— —0' Q O p O� aammef_•[ot as 'i:;:�'• e. ` V. f dI11� IG,I 5E01 CA:g.mr Of MP af iai•Al ffer •-. I y tnrramz e-sm er -.r.,,�'.:-r" _ ;. ,: ;x /: li ' P`•ar tef Mt LP=01 ]. • .c m ' A./ 04 frtfarrai'MG1 .4,,`•\,`a. - .t n f s rgyt'1„ QIVUOOJfbJ 2 _ °.L'�°" ) e x�CcL B v AT. • _v ' IIJ� olrae•1e rN]f!J'•;,Ga tSJ]s' '• , g• ' •t •I A d as THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ;.!i= '; ??�." NOTE+ DIVIDING LINE BETYtE J + e?;,r THE EXACT LOCATION.ELEVATION y.'2 ,r-. _ '4"'_. f'';" ' LOTS I AND 2 CONFOR S. c l AND SIZE OF EXISTING UTILITIES_ ¢ .® •. � I" - WITH THE ZONE LINEI e a a L'' - I \ r o\, �•� � PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. p .L_ _. AS ESTABLISHED BY li,t,1 �' p i / .' ..r• CITY OF NO.3329.RENTON CRDWJyYC 1 I 6� A + it?`°'tl�t r:t OMIT w (3 ;� ' .,a'} d y' • 'fp-Y'+/ •y t 711 T, CA.RCt m iSttanPKw m Kan m STATE NOM m,I m C.LICIT,TM ¢ Z .:.{.f i,tf, .-• - �� ."I/l[� A .•u TO SIM O AISat51P StG ROB[tC[a.,u:XTl6 ' L�) S T....i';•;. - 4� / rt.KZ as Traa,n if - �9 to rrt;F'_;;'. - - •%:L::'`,iT' . d 1 fteenaaA ♦txnrnr o ) Odt t. sw er m cr ainm o MISS m STATE momr CO.T.x o Ltsn.nn= to a "•„ NOP9'a•r !OO• f ' I'I' d 1. n To STATE 1Y 105111GTm am man vAEYIm COOT CC=W.ESS;Y. t, a '` r':• , 3 .I .. d 3 :.i;F?r s .a•es'.i•f ,ym • • / L. `9TR,.....,-..Am EATSLTOTS=AV.R MOO Como MCI E .:T w,P,l,l ti..-4 _ p ti�!g",A'•'.Y,. :• HQ.as IPfr@ Gi' ' _ MS mlal IOC.O.TC06TEWM. _ _ • Yr:�] !,. _ ":I'i[•Z¢' Ct•,i:: ///�� atr5 vrnr , OAS, - — 1 ! '• Mill. M o.4,a:1,.,4°fL u'cm�leme 011=TT=/CS.m.¢'an m.1, ¢ Q � t:3+'1''a3�•' , ` a'YS• :,: , d f `j • L- M a 1.-4 t.,kw:TOT onrrn Mil M.CO.w�a m.MISS m]m a .t!�•;'.;,,:. •: L :. ?:• / d / t Mg a lt�n Ara aL a W ]"S'•' , _: d• — - - A. Torn MOM caT,Ta Teals�.IT.CO:.a mxs,ca m LESS. F �F':.]'"'' • '177 ; / �� 1• • 1•j t. 60r[Otr IS to twE IXltwTlp C(uT•t v ON:waL rtrasl[GI m r]® ® :I}J'e;f4c VI'.�. • • •`'0•e t 1e,• : n[rns].rrm ao d 0 -.- ]J.- tOSt.]]aC[Y]E W alnJY1L Ntro 4TJdWY. ,•.S'� ^ ,1�i., t. O. MAIM TA nun -CO=MSS uAtult. •_•••�J•;,d'5r't • • _ .:•�-;`1 ��ti.r'r0•'� ✓I e .. T.9'CM MISS NI m Z. . Casa..L44.1 e.. / VICINITY MAP. ill �. • mti:`5.:.'cX••'•:` CC r ..m sebAs Ltnn][,9b r0 WTrr (h. H'r"'p 1: .'a 15 -. r e .wr.,.n.. o l..•s.[tr . ,e L r{{«pph.pp��[..Llry m o a]n Lvr,].t..wt eei•w.* N: i..' t.E,!','-.• ,��•.�•~£ �``;!. , m• rvr,cm rm.r r n.vr.®. "" • r m or.r te:4:1 wl • «e.+r=I :::...' +titl.a`-* •m vblA<!a•ra actually mooaW `f., p • "' [.[.......................... ., wLw.. .ieatioei ..o atea[r. • !.� .ri• ]]++ actual poi ea@. • ..a.w mm•.r..[S Asr..er. mam All are .to Aan.avr t a�ef Mt woo-sly,ly,,,0. 4! •. {1g C'Vi,L... arouw.atr.r % '`ry... Aal•, 'I®•[•mnaf IK .1[• •\' it• G* �!r ..• rr.m r m,•s .r M..a a ero][a . rl.p ii,. e.]]wtw. }•.a' 1!'','pr :{.i5n•1T.,5. «,....• :•.ue"` :Irm.r]m m .w`o. �`a:c.ai.:at.J amt,[f T:. ii : .].!' .i 7[. :,.L...,.,t,: r r of w.i �' • i ;.E: a e':'...°amo` .iy:ua�:Aj.t.«i:aro; ..:n .i . . '-f•:,./J.'°.z;i"-•�:: .[.•r,...[ • , .• •..n0.]trmt tall. .,[ E.to[ •. !F; \ • ue;r. ..•. rT] t: At•a.w,� .r laitacnal of all:.t..[A.r R a, :°[i,".'': ,d„ i,,.,.r . • • r r tr �. r'•14" y 3s a art •T 1'' •• !,d 1«r.«.r Antailq� •[M•a @d .d F C. r«An «r.m.. L.,w[ •+sr ««rya .V:,'_ r:'A t... •.�A,e rr .o m..nr n r.roi .t:^ •..A Aaw ]aud Ilea.,fil.1...,I w f[+•A..a 0.n,1 / - "at+l:,li%',J r«. .;t=""t:L' .a...n. .[mr, m.,"..........a.... eo ' n L %'i" f%.'�;P A.. - Ap•I: v UM, �SaraPeNa`ll�'.at.0llrN W.a+p[w•!4 �/, �• F, .•f .z':':[l.•;.. ..«.. ..7 Afw tt:[tw. /•�a I;E't• 1:°.tvil4"•.'',t• •�- �'1 ,•ew o5" tw'Eo R/0al tl-i '1*j- _ (� i • • L;• # A.+ •a.� . 1 ^A',A Y.+.p e...ew 1\zt:i.'," .{. -SS.,,•Li ..N.t'1:�,'.,t.•::_ aL:ol:t•]n uciri�::i.«.[..,Ar t.A.m...[[.t ....�.� _, T :.r Ia�0^.:\1G.,.•r' • ,� . 4�,,.[� • . , • J. i`[ : • • i 08-162 L,'`%t.',:}ri'4] •• •, 3Lly i �•� •�.;': 1 • .,: ' . • ` .I � Ylr ,, r ,Cr;: •:r,1_.�r;�.t;iar� • '} '-a .I ia , r : ;j . . ,: %:, _. rTn:] 1 :1rc - J ,; ., :; ,f :fie. ,ft 4 .yk?,•• . - . • i ' P•xt:>:�....r �DD2 r-Flr.4RL /T,Lr-c7 CO44 Te cKFC,3 '- t' <`.j�� 1 , 1.SAT OW) sSdV rvV'^••a --' ' Z9° ~ 11' •.�.� - ,,-�- t.� P.c 14o F.8 zoo �.�vr IgrairarWI_ ��• !Sss13r� GA iOo - /Fi.'. —y1. - _ -e-- —--- J 0 'V'''' � 1c=t . fa a^a ..-..-'1r. - FtlL_ _ Ot[ —,^ f' �-- -- f—vo Lr I • 1,1012TH ELEVATION SOUTH FI o TION 5 TIaN A-A ; (V.I1+ r t. 1. +7 Fux(SYP, CAN��Fetre P�.III,G11�7Cer R4TA a _ T T" ___- I- .rira GLAlpwc7: es•2 Z '------1--- ---- ,e,_ Lill:. 1__ �NSTI2L .TIon!j VN. 0y � [I j 'j-] 1 2t24 N(a OIb i721Cr:6-I t� cope.: U.S.C..b 1985 z 5. FAST ELEVATION VJI T__EI.EVATIO1.1 lYcove. 198C0 0 •Ic. '<y - SEISMIC ZONE: 3 z i,' I Tar'-..1•1-I:AP-FA: 54994342B t f I. I oo8� . z in 4d�tior EA : Ai0906 367.69. • ITOTAL.MIX WzFA: 7�IQO 5f ^G - 51.1 ,.-41,3004.PdL.do I;srv{{4.- mmw9e»apt . . •.OI•1r S AVE.h1E. IM•b' i .P'R.6�>68CG I STAl1/20x?SF,PW52 STA11S Ix '`° ocFsnwa �e:+mt+�__PjO _ FOR THE M•ALLAAS Z•S APT /�_ __. _ _ il. Y r - sL___ �, _'_ C ate V ] "11.l�.3l0•r 2=38 5 TL.LLS �`, • 1 yC _- •- _ '� � __�' N,s. MONV•tEN7V�s 1- -�rllr:t:d....-?:11.ffll-t-'::::;N: W: WPNa� / y y __ � � � -1"...-�°� / 11H Fi • Y,.a+ ..K 3w"-sFa iX� r JG'^`u '`s -5 -�'S'!.C�.` Ta�/A,7: '' / --�1 .� x t,-;+ •r a cH N u / �J, 1:..r,,,,..,: ,t,' 7, ' '' s -p �r5 � �sx< i'� � y yp• '�z e �0 l� / 1 _�.�'Ys+.A•ITT F4tt-19 aU aie 1 1 IC/ �' /i elwFrc�rNc-t c-,�;e i azc.�s � // i /7,111111: I I•6-z e 4 7'4'2. :e I W ' , errst.Z �� I !Illll11lli1' —e_•''' UJ� _. �� �:. 9I rv� �1 I ' �L 11 i IIIF'Eel. \� • • :;, , HOT»•4vo Zao .�, . a z � st�,:a 1 �L I _ 23 1J-1 -0-4 2,- / _-,III l_,-_,I I : 17 I 1�f e u,dp. u n,! -- ' cvr.' �ee".t•45' ' 7 ,i /• r - _! 1' I, r j T f I ( - ( I� ft 7 Q,_ .wm:7.0-FXSaww c�1 .: �. .r`3 � v 2 ;: _,,t„,.. r„..... fi - • ' Lj .111 ya_,1-il,1 T I { _! -- E- tt1,o,,, . .y BBPQ 20 RZI,J•T/,N ;, ,,e 7 ,•/,',-„:, _ �_u -17--1- r _ - 4k.),t`<a t✓u0„ 1.J':.9 To qw,H uero�rrs _ c '-,..� ^'•4.w ,v x,' Tc- , / -/ - -� I 1 I I I I I. I ! ll`' w<'.i..r ' r 11 B�tTyFR.,,,.17 5'L1w7v....wE STRIP(TYP) 4 / I .dye �T 7--�7 -ITT-7-f- • t'•7,...45 :-_�(� . P.•rITINW 1`-.1D•b• Oq� t-o '�'-tt,>,s rrp f''' �' �-�'�� T 1 I� 1 I``1 I I i I 1 I I I I ` 2 n `'R - r� JLt a fi f�,; / / l;L anti zd 1.. , 2(.gOSP• v Q• µ. Iza✓. �au o.ng rs 1r•• 4 - Li 'a rat.,} s. , . - - 'I �••F.t V2F-a IN ` �..Y rx.,,. it .! �•• 1 L -I' .1 I •. _ •, 1N Z • • ✓Y IWD OC2.Icia jeF .;'..? J a + •'+h•; `fir•' /G _ -i-i-i ' e ■ _ III' A.1 _• (1)2'RTL'GIR'JAK�S • n� IS to II-, ?I o •o- II1r,'-{I 7{ ^-ijj���[] �R (11�,11/�p :; '6FJ- . • _- r t..�1'p b-Irr FL4•'c,6CG .f• __ 1 I . 1 1' I -l-_.1.1_11 a ■ R 0L II ,II sxcAv,..TON• IG' Ll-Nce_C 1,-PE:Tell"(Tr') - / RcJ gt4.4 �� /N.1 z'dMvlx/e�jL�CRN�,�.p I'�lo'•o'+y• 9 LQI--}�---7� • Gv V!(JN..7 K._o _ 11 li D 1 14 =„�,- L� I I J�_�_-�- PL�J 1T �1eD , , / II I ° =-_F MNL.11,107, -- ,e... H _ --,Ill- mxru 6•.5i A, PIN�fLt,f C., ./SX,xL P•.E,�O,4 MLwl Zr-fie R 1 rG.a¢e 'I iiiiii.„ 2131. I `Il � a>~�F4,Lx�l� � [SW7•'''•,ws�e:...�ry'rru.,•vr+,1U'G.-I¢,�i7ED'}1tlH .�i1' M°RL.1RE A " %f GT —CL- nc w.r0. G XFK CstU:.tiV+Ti:M/VI`.EAMP�fi,GJ:NP�3,6'-5'1I 4 -�yx �jIr12. R— 6FFt@D TCPX,I- p D%0 PFIDTIWA Fi2A%Eei/F'Uf 1N,A-'--A.'H 'E 6r�� � L�� II II Ill I • �5•.�• a _ y - 1o.coo w ' ' F. r. pkw.dr,1I.Likze.cRJ.1..-zAt.:_w4,.✓74^E• LAB= II- •o %1�� 9�... ; v 5/ ._ r1M.24; s -rP.E P-AIJTIl•-1 L d+1•^ HYPr.,,,cX ht✓P{:1 VA,c.T r_•:twr a•i--w•n�. - _ ..__ emu, 1 • • S & OO587 > i . /1/ 1 • EW Ft Li, in I5e- / cte144 a�A• b /0, . . P.: • �'CN."T /O I�l t�tl�4Lt� .��• �., IS FAT t �� D Nil' flatrArAIP-ar- ilif 4P4P4rie • . . 5.41 k‘14 Vr.eargatarlitailiViiiiilliketWitoa lefo meiten-tion ' , -A 1\ *`' vliviimemk. ,,,, - vitzi.,.." Ti‘..„%h, ' , '''*-1%,v.; -emit, eosir) --t- av,..., A 40 41=,....1 .,...x....... , web" \INN\ ,s,. .11‘,,,%,,,,,„,:-7.11 ( -- vim A., kik ,4&110 ' '''.'. ''' ---+. . AallalailkarAriffe.02niThrAridrAlr # i 'I-pp-4k - - v _. , - - _ ,____,, . /fr w-. ..,_ ,N,____,,s,__ �V'- _, _,% \ Nr4`..- , - b tooa.mmEte . I 'i ' • • I . . . .. 1 IF.1R4 . \ ODD. 83320/ a • • MITI • • 1 � FUTVREF lSHEDGIAD�-J--- — — �_- R5 , \ o OAT. 1•ttn, Si a /', ' B ado _ _ , .\ \ " r��e..,ovally m ..11°r,BEs .Y.1 TEAT `°"� . ,M,rw. Jrron r W ndsm 3cs -. r� v NOV.M. o,,,v BOUNDARY ,,,,, .o o. • Elm gCh+ 'as _ Hills Pork I 51 i"°�- ' r _• Q y I.E_99.Qt - \` 1 ° umu.aemvs IRON.0v°sows°�}1®� �w. mo®v a�o.>.COURTv SCORCH IT.�r.OF m.�v°eia TIRO COMITY s° unp1 N'3 $a es 3 K.* -11N.1•SILT ST `E \ �,RR_smy °m® �� OE rmnuur 01.4 d a Nw T a . R aaY.. a.9 CORM.-CITY OF RENTO%a.,a.a,BA CR.„p°aa.R .wRTINN �wr n e wR.Yr RN�,Y°..aNe ., yA� O. -wir,j SECTION A-A ��\ \ N s.°00 w, .., r . • 8030.10 AT OFCMCOAST I. ..s..1, NORM BERM TO BE CONSTRUCTED FOfl LONG TERM EROSION `� NO SCALE ALONG myTS y�°,,°RIONI.°r-ur a. I i•� `1? 'P.. ." , ..� i. .iGEK7 i4 a� CONTROL°/JIO •HYDitOSEEDED AS FBiST PHASEOFCONSTRUCTIOIjp� \. `\\�., \ sl MU=mu.O MED SAY W./ 1103. ALWORT'. • areal ca°urrL°aso,as RECOROS rm osuv MOM mer.me- ���� .:Fenn,/ JRdmIYI'T>. Z. {g9 - - / \`\\\ 01. e,R¢me nr sueslzaul rocr.mom OR LESS.mra soumR°T ' y,'♦ram''.:' ••J fK1 ✓ ., 4 •°Tz • , s i1 .ov1 o 600.�iv ,o u, ,°v i1 CO I.PROPERTYm US=BY ae ALONO SAID SORTS OMR EAST ssex sees TO.wort suuut * 17�.�r1•. �, / \ \` ` ,OOmz.r%mu O e9RMST NOR m t. OS 1. 0/4 SAID CURVE TO TBE MI6 AND q0 200Y. • Q� LINE Rma wvr IS TEE NNmevulvsr r�.ffi°a /ST %.�..`•x•e `� J 1 / • \\\z' r ORDINARY wce soon ,env • �r. =\.. • 169)I t, • `�„"„P1/ •m. pQL / \ \ \ .tigau WIZ VALLEY ROM av SOOTS elze E-T 1sza.!zv.,o / , S: I �O // \ 1.FINISHED SURFACE TO BE 1 112 MINUS. T.TRUE PODIT Or MM.OF SAM i� • 2.BANK ADJACENT TO CEDAR RIVER TO • r b f .�\ `.Q�L�(___.wA.' N �' �•\` •`.L\ BE YDRO SE°_�TO PENT EROSION. .,DISTANCE Or Rena rezr; MT 27333 M. /VC �- \`��9. io-o•.MT ITS.wvan,RT LIE 8517316 0 BY P0,m,n 10 Or TEAT • �-F i /� \.\7`O•.• ARY HIGH WATER MARK COUNTY IN w wma rmmu SUPERIOR COME°r TES STATE or...OM POP rm° 1 `+o Oy ;° .•�, \ • Ae"OXIMATELY ELEVATION 30 °r ,RY a Tw>AHD m®vm m s m LIss v, •R+-••°Y a 1,1,;. .as. / •R9x \�.„4.•EXI T G CONTOURS FROM AERIAL PHOTO RM. SWEET N.a®INar Is,.a w MT PORTION.PAST aw Maul'.a w , ` :.Pl.air••„�•:'I. y I' ;''-• D TE 31t6 SUET ► w_{ \4 Q FQ MOM Rma ace REL.sas LINE OP oxvmur®®v,m w 7 cr.. Renton(sill "9 a•. �. --'-- TES Elem Sch—"{- o m too / ,R9: Dore° - 1 '\ . NORTHERLY m MT aavv No�ur ITS CRY- - \\',''• \\ LIMO BY PARAGRAPH 10 or MT COMM OEM.°Pa'wR°Qo011NVN"RO,RTo Io1%•®e mu:T orar PROJECT SITE "'�'+ a I.THREAD OP ra vnaa•r ou�I.or Rlvv.° ra RDIt. _ Rees 8 \ • SITS.,e IN 116 CITY Or Rvwa 03M.OP mo. roe mom MAP Qfl • ego \ SCALE Y.12a6 e e 9 \ — RP..a•e9 .flag - \\` \\ T ���—_ •• 401111r._ S °99, \ \ Z =ELSTBIG SPOT ELEVATION �� �`�x^� �c _ T \�s1�k9\\ — 40—.EXISTING CONTOURS _ ! 1' �, 1 1,1�� 1� - R°.•° •` `' \` \ \ ®.EIISTMG CONCRETE WALLS �� �� �zr 1� , �� IP �• - I I \\``` \ -EXISTING BUILDINGS {Rl,a '' ;, .nia -All 1 -- / /- i— � \.\ .\ _ �z1/� 1. EXISTING CONCRETE WALLS r Y l F�� � \‘‘‘,:,,,, ` `s\ ��� TO BE REMOVED(TYPJ ,_!' •Rpz LIMITS OF WORK - �1�~— ���` \ \`` ` \ C s. OS �'1,` ��•�� rie ; l�. 1 ��` \ •is w` \eg •EXISTNG CONCRETE PADS a� No a 1,a6 m •` \x .EXISTING VEGETATION I, _,l __ •J2140a , 10„wYEAR FLOOD PLAIN \``. \. ,, \ o it .BE Rt:M•�� isle �/ /�,) .lAa o°; 41.110.19 °p \ \�`• n_ ___�.TOO YEAR FLOOD PLAN 0. • �1` F'r/ o'! ' � 4 319 �`` `. .p �� ,ate —• •flax • 1 \ •`� '\ ---�=PROPOSED Cp17TOMS os �'� p �.� ' .ers �\. / ,��L",�ji'�" .sax -- \\:‘, \ ' `' \��� , S•/ \� ` v� O • .flea . \ 11 _LI , n°R •nog / •!9z \ •! wo IA • EXIST �. /`- ' .ns9 •azl •eze \\ ••,�STOCKPLFS ti\'` /1 / F n \\`�%J� - • \``��_ •lw..e .,9s / I _�R`\ •'fix\-\ us \ �t ``1 ., 96 _—�Q+,- ,1._. ilex ..ses •!9e • `\\\• \ \\ KM" Ros � .. ..._ Y `Val ,�i'1 . 3__ ;OIL - C .87 •3e9 r \ n r "�ilt�i'i. TrI:J7S� I:�,z ,uz • • J .°os vw \ * \ • • • 'F FILL TOWTC' _ - I -r �_��- 1illibk • ,may .ne9 ,�' \ `\ r ON PMKPROPER ��� BUialimRY. — ..'�..._ ��������������_��__.. ,' = __woI \\\ `\\ A APPRD%ITE +TM BDRT - '��••-- �•' • -• __ !ea li: ° . SEE N. E 4. CEDAR , E D �`S�� I • APPROXIMATE BERM r4 R R / V E R 1- — ,,,so I ,�.. ��T° . APPROXIMATE LOCATION LOCATION j =ESILTATION POND \ --- :T. d...A: one s9 1� ',-,,r.C_-- - _ J .-- ...' _ ___ ____APPq dye_i. 7 �Y .29e \=\ '641 \�\ \\\ , 33 r- 3EE T rE SOU N • 1;%!4 -''J.: r. // -BNDY.LINE EST.BY SC.DECREE NO. 90072 •\�_ ...�..' •\298 F'..�� "' - EXISTING VEGETATION ALON' - CITY OF R E N T O N • THE RIVER CONSISTS OF GRASSES B ' D.• DECIDUOUS TREES,TYP. •1 • O HUGH G.GOLDSMITH 6 ASSOCIATES,INC. D.......Nr or PUBLIC WORKS a Os \ 11• Conaultinp Engineer'•Surveyors•Planners GRADING PLAN for • -;° ,• _J. - `.i3�•1', ' - �� • STONEWAY CONCRETE INC. • g �. - 01 8612`` 1915 Maple Valley Hwy.Renton Wa. 98055 �`/� --_ —__ _ • ePoes.0 lies nu a • Ia ..... .,. ,,.., swssrJ-erg rvs r nm . .• ..00.e.... ' • • \\ • ,b\H -,%:.V2 \ • G4'�PQL y \ \\ • • , /// / •492 P.v. • 0r iO 9 •909 \ \ LX. \ \ a . �sse '1�\ 41.1W , __ ...•° 44 . \\\T‘::,,\\ +�i� /' !� w2 �C: "�1� �� \� ` `lay • os �ti9 a ° e pave. ��, r� 4 ;1 . or /yam °]I 40 �� a!°e •!li S'I a° > '\♦♦ ♦ \ 11M14'-il 10* ao a]23 �\ ilt�, ,,,;p I �,, of ;� 9aa 1 \ !00 / \�; / •ice I /UM � 2397 I •425• \��\. \\ - 06/ \ 4" A 1 a I k./ • ■ '�� a31]•� al86 an.2 •396 a406 a . \\♦ \ ♦. tIPP • az9 l‘,\.;:,. i\ .67 "T') ..•.5 1� lw. .lB.9AM,...=0 317 ,.14. Milk 30.3 .92 \. APPROXIMATE SOUTH BURY. \�• --� \ SEE NOTE a. �� i`1_ •-_ lB.o \ • ' �� C:EDA R R / VER •`� `��� I li • \ \l.. .\ a29.3 Iziagiii .. °,x3a_• _ _ -__ • a `�... SET R NO ATE SOUTH a293 \`\ \ \ I • BNDY.LINE EST.BY S.C.DECREE NO. 900TH �` __ \ '\� • _ v CITY OF RENTON • • ORPARTMR NT OP PUBLIC WORKS • 0'HUGH G.GOLDSMITH&ASSOCIATES INC. \ •�•• Consulting Engineers•Surveyors•Planners Stems Y W0 \ _ MOON MIEN PLANT -R -- ---- -- 6A¢I o. ns NO oI _-" STONEWAY CONCRETE INC, OnlaXr•• 9-3-ar. . . ' -7: - • ,. . • . - . ' . . • - . • . . • . . . . • . . • • \ . .• . - ' . • \ ..3\, \ • . . . - -2 .s•-% • . • • 4- . .5,000 1 . .• - . .. . . . ..: .. , • , 6:..,:. 1 • ‘.. • .,.. . \•,‘,, , rl \ .‘,• cii, . . . N ,/ . . . / 4. ' \\s`s!'•.\\ : . 2 NMES: • 1.Mime is to be installed pier to any rriNcr scrientston activity on site,cr .4.2 eny ciessunice actIviynezr the Cechy Rhier. • .. • . \\.'n, „\\\ • • •! / 2.Sit fence to be meddled troushout the curse of conslection. , . • , . / \\•.‘ •\ . . o ' ion • .49.2 P. . . , . 4/ •,\ ....: \\, •.,\. • - • • ...,,. i \" • 1- •• .\\\„\ .441.2 , i_ e--I • ..__... \ FIRMLY EMBED FENCE POST(METAL OR WOOD) a44.9• \\•s,\ ,,,..04.9 .5 FILTER FABRIC SECURED TO FENCE -.....‘1143 i p .47' : 1-. -,.•: \ ,\\.• \ • m4,230 . . l_4111111P1..........-ym.,...-.1,2 .- -..IM.M. .-... .3 • • . • - - 3. WE FENCING FABRIC -- -- ..-... - ..-___ --- ..;..-,7i1M-r.A...... -10111400 .-- . 1 \ •••• --------------:- ' SECURED TO'ENG . _••••-..., . NE • E POSTS ---- -- • --N••••-'''..:;..'"3!e e-3..3`--• •Ituilr . • W ...,.. ..H.......z...:;;;;; 4,(Prc 4.'D 1 114.91•' I a -Ilk ilib''. \\\T.‘a,,\\\ .. . . :.., -.,.0,,,,,- . . •* fi., 4,:i _ . . ! -a 11111kat INN. . , •X/ I ,Sir TRENCH-I.MIN.DEPTH .32.4 • g • . , . \ ,‘•\\ . TOE FABRIC INTO TRENCH BACNFILL WITH NATIVE MATERIAL 1111110 • • \ , ih, 1111 .- • , r,P-4,..--- 411 ". r'\..,...1 ‘......N . \ s • • /.4233 IT.•'.,2011..'.44J1P101 AO"' ''...11111K.._ la. \.) • ..,----- ir 1, ,. qt.. \\'Z"‘"\.\\\ SILT FENCE NO SCALE . ,..a.HSI1,74 ip • .27 sl./ 5 • .0.4 01 S•'s Idi\•-•ti;a1.•> . \‘ ‘.\\‘‘‘‘s ,\._\ 4 • . __-- * .3.3. . . ... .....-- .3,7 OIL 1 .-- " • \ . - NF4421 J' .13 Oki 44'. 7 Illicia.-11111. ........ ...444 I '• * "mill \ '45\35, 0 IN •;' II. is'---- .. • •402 .4. ...........---.... ..--..--- ...,..., N \\\‘s. \ :-.....'"33•1.1{;_,L,\,,, / • Iiiii.I. s". .........Titts....,. - • .40.4 • • '.... 1/4:07 ri./ • 00.4 301 S MI ' , • 0 \ \\,3.9 c i I 03. illti/P ''• s \ • • . • . ‘1111111. A ./:' . . • Bas, •42.5 . • ,-,-- -- ...,. ....Z.-4,- - -tit= Nirlf/ 116, I • ' .•541 _ .., • fill...•--, 0.A . . I , tilsilimiot .,... p.-....x.. tt .);_k . . .... 1,.-..... DIA.4..p... 4.2 „,,,, 1- .'" 3 • •35.• .19 11 '\\ \\S• \ • • • n • ... . .41 . '1''''''..!..4.1,261111111%4".4440, ";"46151111116.0...... .2.5 1”)6:2/ . •.., \ ' Illik '' .• . . - '! . . r. 1 wie\ • 101., .......41...z. / ' --- . \ 1.4.4'‘, ----- ---..---- - :=7:-.--f--"Aipmpr.,'"••---.410, ------.--'12-_--iir . ...______:_. . illb- ' '''' • L__ _ I \ 04. \\,‘ \ •, 4, \ \\\,, • - - ..........,___ • --,.... 3-,..,...- 4116/. ---- , ' . ,.. ; ATE SOUTH MK / '-....'47t*:r-1:-."./,.:,...... •..r .. .,,,. .... 00.1 36.0' illifiV, • , SEE NOTE 4. ..... ,4,'.,---,k ,_so-% ,K,-- '•• -'' • Ii .. . , SILT FENCE i --C z D 4,:.-R--1:pe• , t ;,.-ca.•'.4 .• ...••!.......M.,'.....;IN,,,.... 1.. .- r"S ........• ... . a 40.1 • . (SEE 'ETAIL) . '• ''.-. YNIP -.a. 't. ..„..._--...„,..-...,__ 1'. ,- iii -'•%-,Thi ------__--- .------__ _ \ 1 . . onntryi ,-.;. • -. ,...„,, ,,,,•,,-_-31,7,.,.. .t-^ ' '1- ,•:.',", 1 . ' •• - s .• '., -- -.........,..............._1 "" •-•-.____-- _ ••• _ * - • '''''''''-Z-'', IF- ••A* ......... .t'I: ••. .• •; 1! 1 . *.• 3;i3.0 IZ,' ':•. ' ._ .... . . !w.... .. ... .,,.• .._._.„.._.. ,,.__.,;...,...._...... \,..,,,,,,tu---,i is k a i \1 1 j t. " - - - p • ... .1. •• :, ::. • ... .._:_-..a,, 411 : 1 T--,:: 2 :,'.$;-,..;•-')• • .k, ". .- l'''''' . • / -• ---------........... szaa • ....../ *ay.LINZ Err.IT SC.DECREE NO. SOOTS I ' ........ •-••••.................c .••••• • --/ .I . ' • . . 1 • v.,G ..004. . CITY OF RENTON • '..0 HUGH G.GOLDSMITH&ASSOCIATES,INC. . .......... ci r rUNLIG WORKS . •• 1 • I _...0 0.7%.\ 1• ,-,..7..i. I. 4,-. ponsultinti Engineers•Surveyors•Planners, 3 3 . .3 3,... .„../.,3‘.• . T.E.S.CP. • • XI , t '1,.. •.'t •• , . Ar,,,dt.i.,‘,it.,., x fil:, i . , . \ ‘10, , i 0_ I \,...4. Ewa r"---... IRIS Nelda Vila Ily.Rent=Wm BROM 7,1 .v,..,...,el : e ..*------- .....-......_ ,.....____ _______ . •.7 .„..." . . • . . --- . MUM.4.4.0.04, • ' • • _ -- 61, AlIga. .11 1441440/434• ... eseav_b_o•-.4- .... ..mi....... • • nM'o0.0sFA AIR `'� L MAIN liM rFNC[ �d��NYe PX y Pray..the following: \ \- PROVIDE THE FOLIONING: • • ' �sY.2 • },` 9N. QOL A. ImLG \ en \ A, eF5[RIDTION CND NID[OAxE0.DOSiS 4 ST$e I •Z '� 1 I! 30Do tea:per acre of•6114•416 r•(A nnan.)or equal. \ -- slant pal Perixe<r renetpg and•hall be sL(6 stein form aA,ll have top s'D.D.°eiDninp not leas than 5.)9 lbs.per L.F. - - ° •a:}�>- B. `, ant bottom[maim wire. Bottom fabric of fence shall De 1/z inch minimum is' Windsor sL6 :S.TABILarlAairip:niarna. r•cn. .n w o-G<amuiminabove9•mee. seeDl.n+errant.lennm. uxE vosisdin S[h e O1Hills Pork IsA c. R r-1R•o.D.weighing not less than 3.6S lbs.per L.F, . ' 0 d' 3 t.a tel.n.9ranm.e main. ADDtY.e.ne.er sob lbs.D� ,3a ��m S e• I . )• posy sagasfdice J W as>yW�Y `N� O• X Nil `\3e \ B. MTERIALSBncn 11 Dc 1-5/B• C.D. •ntl sign not lean Was Lz)Iba. per lineal foot. BaanglD rorldedfareachcorneteroneDes[. 8rmm zn,l•-�_,��jQ�t(,'� lwm \ 4CaFML d hen•point 6• bola r• c each corner, pull or end P -ti sL 2 )Y �/�; N�.✓,•y--�. WP • Z gnetenNmw 1•ucuN•sa-NUU Oalq/Oa-Eye Oala \ • 11 scoriae used 1n construction e/ chin lint fence nanall bat ,anal fr dean e bin•of al.the lone met. WAY _/; 9 Nrre afasourlmala-Nls•auel Dr ale a at,. Iron or steel matera shall be calm..except as er•ihaft. SS Linu.1Mal1-B1w Flu rpvteed. ImperfactlY galvantssd mteri,l ter uterial soon Gich teeloua i1tlC 'iFD STECL FIRIx4. .P�a. - •1� K•• M1��ibE (rzt Pap aver nudism's-Ic•lene POINY - `ZSA S enrulena oI palvmizlnp o<[ur;alit no Da«<epUH•. All a Usaeriu 1 Xbtacellanaous a anal 11t[tnpa and n,rtl+era snail b•nef cmx«tal gUtle Post D0 J \ � Dp N- P Ru hlv nlrt•-B'sQ End Sunn \ shall p•fro of sharp edp,s. ,Ill;late members to be palrantiva after «•r quHftY. n9t^At er cut as a Dropriate tale M ,felt and ' . lead,' •I .I I^a' E Q 55�minua sucmluWt-:rm.: Lupine salting to vinple plan•. •ufficlant In« and sham pmP«ti<l to a Dalmuel•Gmi9n I..JLI }pop e U tlneurU-D'sIna Cor•opafa n used 1n conjunction with fabric,pests and wires of the qualities N e ,Po' (.Qdor RIYH`., s s�I hi n O191ta11s...we \\ ''.`• \ •Thv base material for tie mlufacter•o/steel pips a ed for o t specified north.r Weight o+zinc coating onab•lw listed fte•I fittings (((++' ✓• •0 braces Nall conform to re a rem n s f AS.Designation .,"tea shall be.1.2 oz.De nu are foot. Se a ell avMIN.fret Clyde Robin sea Doman,Post Office Du 2655, Castro \ weight tolerance on tubul.posts Nall be applied a provided below.`gg (�' J ,��.T Park'>• , <+0,�t^�,,,` r /y\ vaiteY,uli+emi•94546 NIS)les-gas. 815.00 pee coma. \\` ` CM 10 can I �r '9,O 200 y I `_ , • `\1•{ ` •All ports and bean shall be but-aippm galnniz•e. They shell he Alll posts for chain link fence shall by fitted with approved ST alp: o <Lw Q {j /i - minimum,net of 1.0 oz. zinc mating par square root of surface hen pressed steel or aluminum cap on each post eeaign•dlo mi.ur tide // • `\ r ` P \ with m fnemiec,l ale being less than 1.2 oz. zinc caging per aware on, >Q / 1 Cl�� 169)I !1't ' '. �QP \ \\ ieeeof iin<af•a eetii ere:IneieeaNg oif webers u,•awl°l ter cmm:mg.., TENSION tSidipIR1 galvanized steel b shall be not less than 1/e• a 9/4. m i,. ' `` .ofwf9nt of costing is as I.u•122-inch piece cm Irev n< equivale °fork height.`Mry• to D•[treaded through n`ric vase-a . (� iYfG \cp .\ \ endreof gals nized member. ittings,.e«< eat end hara,re a all be attache p man of tnsion banes epane noe w sines One ,■ A. ALSI---K'A• /% \ InlzedIn ¢roeamerwINmirem•nes of ASdlena[lanass. Sosha .aeovl E•d/or nunna past and two ban/or mall end'mumr \\ Ott ut•rlas:MallDenV.hued es a 14f: hantntlmr.I� ::111114- �,O / \\ \•5 9 \.BRIO\ • TENSION n• .e• hli a cut . m• SCALE t-=1200' lJ 0 �- a _ _ ,...• • 1 \ - `�zj.``\ ,��t«Dl•fie rani er.e teip ales'�Nlnarvy pteu G`.iaa1 as pthan«e <� • _ m °s$a + •ale 9 '� / 9jJ \\ ` ‘6 TENSION WIRE reinforcing wo-..nai'b•No. )gauge col,a.a9*Ire.ndnanan n.r. \ ZiOgn;::::!H:ne!lit!!!:::::::::::::'.::::::::;2::::::: net leenO.BOez. a aq re,tot. Gvanlza.9 gmg<\\ r; y - - r` L=,.1 a - . \\`` !�\ ll b••prevlee tee at•Lchi�put•'.onwi a ,brl [ ,�4� _ -! _ n<radlnp la•."�'..--:_____ b 2 f eau \" \ ce banestobe Its<tl INof d :::p lvahizaerrlape\ ¢£a".ral ` \ Sl ,�MEAODITONAL +"• �EIISTNCTEWAL® t d �u __ L��t' \ \\\ \\` \\ E. INTALLATIcxa 9 I \' t d0 BE REMOVED ITYP.I \ ins men anal[ e n rrale, TiD.fF pE ,d t .} I` . r 1 - \\ \ LINE NNrEPXDM Re POSTS ts IN THI5 •�. PER.- .' `!, \. uI spa. .e opt mar.m lD•in plumbed,m line PARK G1:pG' '�_.r. • a / X T�'� '. .\• d Dl•<m N •rmti<e1 m it pas. Ait eats b• set/In concrete. DIREGTIC7N. i� . �6.';+ -_ _ /•ao LIMITS Of WORK "�� k \`\�` with cr gauge to steeii`nis`gaugFabrica inum tineneced atline`pnre 'v8 1 \ si :Ai:::li'ilerbv.arl5s.,,,,Tilus,led.ninliet of tiesale e a Y r.m p•.k.4,.. mu; l �_ _ / .ea �� \ ` net.p.eo ' 6% 'F. �-. B • - , \ \ ` •\ (ExD,[ x , POLL PDSTaewf.P ' R y`?'l \^ . < `\ •cal .O'n `.° aib.e,ne pmlra.H[a a i ale,i.In go e.t e.nat N• . 1 • ' / ` \\ msienbanal m be,r e < erminvi na ��''.%::. f� 5 __ o - r pe t •€ \ ` corner phis. Bangs to bl smg0 on L ;y •sal . '1 ING 8 - / \\can, et intarvala e1 asp[core than Ian•. Ammer mxp •r•u e ;en Ito sof /' ''_ J'+/ ;; �- / fence dinctlpn c1mma s0 degree•Or nice. / J:, S• T s BE REM• ' / 5 v II a0 \\ \\• `line.fate a r i In lung runs of fever and abrupt Tcorne•tuf•Crate Y it: iWm.% /' 6 .T, _ ._9 •po •: �\ a0 `lens. cell ft gas true recta Ism terminal en or corner post t0 � F i J O� -_- `\ 11.ant tan.p lens � �-.. s1,/ O a 73 , " -_ .ao2 41 - 4 `.Pop.FTi1xG M(0¢IIXF.ML ole mN:r.•.Ix,LL Poic STS) Pest`.._ /�1 . !�'/ \ .'snUr hof Hole alm®D,PN t Nvip sg//g� S / P>•` t�� �T. q, .ir5/ % �\\r`�\ ve\ Xiz6• pa.D• s+•4. i.mfnal K 1\ p2' ' • O OL� .ado \`v. \ Not. 6 Nitre roe •mast,,,rAi at. ...win.m'be enmi ne br �,\\ +.. 4... • •yc ace e I •39 •z , �"yt\ mmimmo eee<aeleriooeieo`ain�9°aei.,�ml`ei`vm`eie:a owl b embedded m.6• --_� �^ ExISTIN STOCK PILES \ ' •s99 •SV I / Y\ corIGETE ` \. ` \ � ai 5 posts to shed water. L--`\ h r.,, --^ I • rFT^°v 3.500 pal,5 nck'm1a,lead erom all D sea @•• • \ /• / TAMaC • • . r - �� _ Paw ea vas-o-� 9 a stretched nob,approximately 1-z•alms,mm�e,from ta,.m,teo:nh .- shal resten.dnale.e1anaante,.aapa<vt.e. F•b.i[ et ei.aemea tetin.DoanprHan[eea Intrerna or noetore N.nI••,epW foe tap rail. .ric N,D b•cut and fastened to each ta,vmal g• 1 / neam n lY b,nt•nalon D,rwINbands. enz mair••nail M faatra Y- ,qR ' 1 \1 la 1 / .se 2 :of nogr gaced•ppmziuUlY Id• a t fabric rollst py;3yi:. „ l 1 soled , s1n91`errand gf IGric;even in W/envcenHnuma Noe \`� NNORVIANDIIP '� )ic. < VIM. S p::.:cYd' S6 • •Safi •s93 •-'+6 .aloe .a3 lice. • .�. ".^...b'n'". :%i...w:" 'n`a•d_�_ :.:, °"~i tvr.ltafinenfen•CU enrtanpe mars :: :.:eat??•.'rr: .:,;... _ __ oe, .Ye9 a.an <.reral, nnthG #. %;:'A'4'b?t y _. - _ - - _.- hi<itl all ` tii`:e:first<s r'� • ,��1 �,,..��yy�t<; B FABRICATION :tlk,^.:','"I ".fil4J�Vu'ro fN:'C"iY;•bE: , '1 .. - _ nw pp uNrice: '�:.mgcb'c .:x 3`'R:'?k:':. 1 ee 't,S' A .: - n all respects. �__ . ,8. p-- �•z --Jz z _i i II .Je 9 .Je 9 •!9 u 'I s \¢ .alas / '✓w p\ I ?Ex0 aR U4<ix i�iSxcE • 6 GHat3-LINK FEt-LE/ APPROXIMATE SOUTH BORT HYORO9EEDE0 WLv • 'S. ..'_ __--_`��y.._--„ - - - � -� �I -s , \. f-\ • I[aL.µE.DERA NEUX MIX(5Now J ��',_ - - _ nB o ' _ SEE NOTE A. N SHAOFA �_ ��y • .µ 512 )�eE CEDAR R / V E �� � 'sil • • • _ •- ..--_. _.__ -- _al B \� \ f F ice'` 5 if .�'�a� _ != ,m9 5?•�:~ .. p.y - SEERON IrE SOL7R A.5 \ \ \ \`AI) ... Y ;n.'� H' E 4' BDRY _ • sal \ _ - wib.L,..: Wes,' 4 -=I°f 1. • / p� .x9 \\ • \\\ • � ' MDT.LINE EST.BY S.C.DECREE N0. 90072 �_ .\ T ,,..I EXISTING VEGETATION ALON � \ CITY OF R E N T O N THE RIVER CONSISTS OF GRASSES B • 0•d• DECIDUOUS TREES,TYP. • •OHUGH G.GOLDSMITH 6 ASSOCIATES,INC, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS r• � •� J•V L.clYs \ ••• Consulting Engineers•Surveyors•Planners Lai4.1�.A•PV' PLAN for ;�r ° el ''"'} \ �� � STONEWAY CONCRETE INC. p r (�L7L}���I 4 c,..1:\/.1\ '� •1 c o eGl2l -� 19I5 Maple Valley Hwy.Renton WD, 98055 • a �1 • m� `�I;c n9Xe Qlir eA iLgt,r, •, y 1t eta N'` .- es<Re r I e 1•.SO' mina amd619rem•24 re. lvm•IOX Anse. OATm Ansovas eareac .ioa_4_ OOO^ OOO^ 000^ 0000 0000 000083 000^z3 000^93 000^S3 0006ST O0O^VT 000^CT OOO^Cv 00008T OOO^ZT 00049T 000^8C OOO^ OOO^S 000^K; 000^33 0006T3 OOO^CS 0006T 00003 000^3O O0O^C OOOW 000066 000^8C �OOlNI8J �8VWWOS 8O� S3UO3 3I8VI8VA C� OOO^ OOO^ O0O^ OOO^ OOO^ OOO^ OOO^ OOO^ OOO^ 0004T- 33V8II WINH3 M8I 3O7iV X SAdHd 101JI dO8JN 3P O0O^ 00049T 40CS8 O^ OO^ OOOCOO^ ^O ^O ^3 ^0 O� 73SM O 8I(II AN IN ONI 833H3I T� MO7d 8A 00T-83AI8 HVO33 CJL ( ^3NI OEM! A8 XVM3NOJLS lV O3OOV 33S-X) NO8 3lIdO8J 3'lSNIS 3.11 OO^6866TS - 986T 1J3S - SI& NOIN38 TI 3 ************************************************** NOIS83A IX-3J-WET / / / / 9S/�S/�� CS 3� TS 0S - N0IIV3IaIO0W / / / / 90/�O 0O CO 3O TO - H803 8O883 086T xVW O3iVudO 9Z AON O3iVO 3SV373H 333H ************************************************** 9T:CWTT z8/33/oO OmO33X3 NO8 SIHl T 350:1 CT:CUTT Z8/33/00 T XXXXXXX XXXXX XXXXXXX X X X X X X X X X X X X X XXXXX XXXXX X XXXX XXXXXXX X X X X X X X X X X X X XXXXX XXXXX XXXXXXX X X ************************************** ****************************************************** SOT3-8PE (SId) S0T3-OOV (9T6) * * OT:Cs: TT 3Wu zR/33/vO 3iVO NO8 * 9T9S6 VIN8OdI'lV3 /SIAVU * �_ * NOIS83A IX-3d-W8I * / �_' . ` � �/ ���/ - O 3�IOS �338�S ONO33S 6O9 * . ��~' �" «' ^�w * 086T xVW O3iVOdO * 83lN33 ONI833NIDN3 3I50708OXH 3HI * . ' * 9Z6T H38W3AON dO NOIS83A * S833NION3 dO SJ8O3 XW8V ^S^O * / ' `_ * S3udO8J 33VmOS 83iVM * lOO^N38Va33 3Jxi<\:8 swaameaed go aaqmnu pTjewuI LADE WASHINGTON M. ^ 100 24^000 30^400 19O^900 .00O ^000 ^OOO ^OOO ^OOO ,OOO X3 10^000 ^OOO ^OOO ^000 ^OOO ^OOO ^OOO 22^7O0 22000 ^000 CR 103OO ^OOO 19,300 13^800 18.600 20^300 17 ,4O0 30.400 14.900 33.900 CR 14^200 35^300 11 ^000 42^300 10^400 46^300 91500 51 ^300 10^200 70,300 CR 8^500 80000 9000 95^300 9^000 105^300 8^300 115^300 7^400 125.300 GR 5^200 135^300 2000 145000 8^000 151000 8000 165^300 1O^600 181 ^300 CR 9^400 189^300 14,200 190300 18^200 190^900 19.800 237^200 ^000 ^OOO NC ^OOO ^OOO ^OOO MOO ^500 ^OOO ^OOO ^OOO ^000 ^OOO SB 1 ,250 1 ^500 3,000 ^OOO 160^000 80000 1495^000 ,OOO 8^900 8.900 U/S �ND OF 1---lOR7H BOEING BRIDCI.�, X1 60000 ^OOO ,OOO ^OOO 62^000 62^000 62^000 ^000 .000 ,OOO X2 ^000 ^OOO 1000 18,700 22000 ,000 ^OOO ,0OO ^000 ,OOO X3 1O^OOO ^OOO ^000 .00O ^OOO ^OOO ,OOO 22.700 22^7O0 ^OOO BT 2000 ^OOO 22^700 ^OOO 237^200 22^700 ^OOO ^000 ^000 ^OOO 1 04/22/87 11 :53xVD, 2 X1 892^O00 33000 107^500 26O^800 840^000 830^000 830^00O ^000 ^000 ^OOO CR 18,900 ^000 19^400 45,900 19,300 73.4OO 19^400 89^700 18.600 107,500 - CR 15^700 114000 10^700 114000 10^500 124,300 10^500 134,300 10^500 144^300 CR 10^600 154^3O0 10700 164^300 10,800 174.300 10^800 184,300 10,800 194.300 CR 10^800 204^300 1O^600 214^300 10^300 224^3O0 10^400 234^300 11 ^000 244^300 CR 12.200 254000 14^300 255^300 17,400 260800 19^500 274^900 22,200 288^500 CR 20500 297 ^000 26^800 323^ 100 28^300 345^ 1OO 28^OOO 357,400 18^500 407 ^500 GR 18^800 426000 17^600 431 ^400 18^700 437^500 ^000 ^OOO ,OOO ^OOO NC ^045 045 ^OOO ^ 100 ^300 ^OOO ^OOO ^OOO ^000 ^OOO X1 1612^000 29000 261 ^400 42O.600 720000 740000 720^000 ^000 ^000 ^OOO CR 20,000 ^OOO 19^600 200000 19^600 228^800 18^900 250^300 18^400 261 ^4O0 CR 16000 265^400 14.300 266.500 11 ^5OO 273^500 11 .2OO 285^500 11 ^000 295^5O0 CR 11 ^O00 305000 11 ^000 3151500 11 ^300 330000 11000 345000 11000 365^500 CR 110700 385000 11 .7OO 395^500 11 .900 405^500 12.000 411 .500 13000 419^ 100 CR 16^400 42O^600 180000 453^7O0 18^800 478^800 18^900 495^900 21 ^800 516^5O0 CR 20,5OO 535^000 190000 583.400 17.900 589,600 19000 596,600 ,OOO ,000 X1 2532^000 21 ^000 1260^500 14O1 ^900 920^000 950^000 920^000 ^OOO ^0OO ^OOO X3 10,000 ^000 .000 ,OOO 1.-0OO .000 ^OOO 50.000 50.000 1000 GR 25000 40^000 21000 310000 20^200 57O6000 21 ^400 73O^000 2O^000 890^000 �R 20^000 1200^000 19^700 1234^000 19^300 1258^000 19^ 100 1260^500 14000 1267,000 . CR 10800 1274^000 10800 1298^900 13^400 1327000 12,400 1366^000 12^800 1391 ^000 GR 14^400 1393^900 19^300 1401 ^900 19,800 1412,900 24000 1439^900 28^ 100 1469^900 CR 22^600 1514000 ^OOO ^OOO ^OOO ^OOO ^000 ^0OO ^OOO ^OOO X1 3382^000 21 ^000 1232,000 1362^9OO 8500000 840,000 850^000 ,OOO ^OOO ^000 X3 10^000 ^OOO ^000 ^OOO ^OOO ,OOO ^OOO 5O^OOO 500000 ^OOO CR 25,000 20,000 21 ,700 230^000 20.600 38O^000 21 ^700 570.000 20000 1110^000 GR 20000 1200000 2O^600 1211 ^O00 20000 1222^000 18,800 123O^000 18^400 1232^000 CR 14^600 1239^000 13^ 100 1246^000 10200 1266.000 14.200 1290.000 15,600 1332^000 GR 13^900 1354 ^000 15^ 100 1358^000 18^500 1362^9O0 23000 1410000 23^400 1420^900 CR 24^900 1434^900 ^OOO ^000 ^OOO ,000 ,OOO ,0OO ^OOO ^OOO NC ^OOO ^O0O ^OOO ^300 0500 ^000 ^OOO ,OOO ^01")0 ^OOO SOUTH BOEING BRTDCE X1 3902.000 19^OOO 1318^000 1487,000 520000 520.000 520^OOO ^000 .00O .0011) X3 10^000 ^OOO ^000 ^OOO ^OOO ,000 ^OOO 25,500 25000 ^000 CR 21 .300 1100^000 24.700 1300.000 24^900 1313.000 25^000 1318^000 20000 1320,000 GR 17^300 1330000 15000 1340900 14^600 1350^000 15^900 1360^000 15^OOO 1403000 CR 14,400 1427000 14^400 1449^000 14^000 1459.000 150800 1464^000 16,900 1466^000 GR 18^900 1473000 21 ^200 1485000 25^000 1487^O00 24^200 1521 ^000 ^0011.) ^OOO SD 1 ^25O 1000 3^000 ^OOO 1180000 4,000 902,000 3052 15^310 150310 CR 34,300 ^OOO 34.300 29.7O0 34,800 ` 34^800 29,7O0 35.200 520B00 / ' CR 2A,2OO 57^500 74^ 1M 19^200 101 ^900 ' 19^700 127.900 20^000 149^200 GR 24,O00 157000 24^400 169.7O0 26.200 172,500 , 28^600 172+510 31 ,400 177, 100 � C3R 34^000 177000 33^300 202^ 100 ^OOO MOO ^000 ^OOO ^OOO ,OOO ` -SB ,900 10300 3.000 0000 114,000 11 ^ 100 1296,OOO 1 ,261 20,OOO 2O^O0O ' X1 6541 ,0OO ' ^OOO � ^OOO ,000 39^OOO � 39^000 39^OOO 0000 ^OOO ^OOO _ � X2 .000 ^OOO 10000 31 , 1O0 � 34,800 0000 .000 ,OOO ,OOO ,OOO X3 10,000 ^OOO ^OOO ^OOO 0000 ^000 ,OOO 34^800 34^800 0000 BT 2.00O .00O 34,800 ,OOO 177^900 34,800 ^OOO .00O .00O ,OOO Y ' M. 6681 ^000 ` 13^000 9000 148000 140^000 150^000 140^0O0 ^OOO ^OOO ^OOO GR 31 ,8OO ,OOO 311-600 6^300 31000 9^500 � '20000 18.300 19^7O0 34,300 - GR 19^400 55^300 20^ 1OO 780300 20000 ' 91 ^300 20000 ' 113060 24000 121 ^3OO ' CR 24,800 138000 32,8OO 138,310 339900 148.300 � .00O ,OOO ,000 4000 X1 6921 ^000 11 ^000 100000 134^010 240000 2401.000 2404-000 OOO ^OOO ^OOO CR 35^9OO Oooq 35.900 10^000 25.5OO 10,010 19.500 19.000 ` 190500 112,OOO GR 24^900 120^000 24000 1300000 27^400 1300010 27^400 1349000 36^200 134010 _ ` CR 36,200 144^000 ' .00O ^000 ,OOO ,000 ^000 .00O ^000 ,000 ' ^OOO .` �O3O `� ` V. '^8OO� ',OO() - - .00O- ' . .00O �^OOO ^O(�} WELLS AVENUE BRIDGE, X1 6931 .000 14000 100000 134.010 10^000 .10,000. 100000 .000 .00O ^OOO BT 14^000 ^OOO 350900 35,9OO 10^000 �51900 35^9O0 10^O1O 35^900 30^600 B�[ 190000 350900 30000 110000 36. 100 30600 117^OOO 30200 30600 117010 BT 36^200 3O^6OO 120^000 36^260 30000 120^010 36,200 ' 32000 13O^OOO 36^2OO B?[ 32.900 1300010 36.200 30900 134,0OO 36.200 . 32^9OO 134010 36.200 ' 36,200 BT 144^000 36^200 36^200 0000 ^OOO ^000 ^OOO ^OOO ^OOO ^OOO CR 35000 ^OOO 35.900 10000 25.500 10j010 194500 19^O0O- 19000 112^000 - (."rz 22,800 117000 M,600 1174010 30^600 120.000 24000 120010 24000 130^000, GR 27.o.400 130010 27,4OO 1P4,OOO 36^200 134010 36^200 144.000 ,000 ` .000 X1 6973.000 ^OOO ,OOO ^OOO 42^0OO 42^000 ' 42^000 ^0OO ^OOO ^OOO ' X2 ,000 ^OOO ^OOO ^OOO ,OOO .000 1 ^000 .00O ,000 ^OOO NC ^000 1000 ^O25 ^OOO .00O ^OOO ,OOO OOO ^000 ^OOO X1 6983,000 11 ^000 10,000 134O1O 10^000 10,000 10.000 .000 4000 ,OOO GIR 351900 ^OOO 350900 100000 25^500 101.O10 '19^500 190000 19^500 112,O0O CR 24.900 120000 24.900 130.000 27^4O0 130010 27.400 134,OOO 36.200 134.010 CR 36000 144000 ^OOO ^0OO ,OOO ^OOO ^OOO ^000 ^OOO 0000 NC .00O OOO .00O ^ 100 ' ^400 ,OOO � ^000 ^OOO ^OOO 000 X1 7103^000 17^000 16^300 160010 120000 130^000 120,000 ^OOO ^OOO ^OOO �R 34.000 ^OOO ' 33.600 16.300 ` 27^300 29.900 26^800 39.900 26.700 41 ^400 . GIR 21 ^700 45^700 20^800 59^9OO 20^900 98,900 20^600 125^900 20^8OO 142^900 ' [-;R 21 .600 145^900 25.060 150.900 25^400 160,900 Y7.900 160.91O 27,600 164.90O GR 33000 164^910 34^ 1OO 1800800 . .00O 0000 ^OOO ^OOO ^OOO ^OOO J. ` ' 04/22/87 1053:13 5 ' NC ^OOO ^OOO 9020 .00O 0000 ^OOO ,OOO ^OOO ^OOO ^OOO ' M. 7483^000 17000 22^500 165,000 370^000 380000 380;000 .000 ,000 ,OOO - �R 37^600 �O0O 36,4OO 17.00O 35^OOO 22^500 29^3OO 27^9OO 22^400 37^OOO ' GR 21 .600 38,000 21 .800 52.800 21 ,7O0 850700 21 ^300 113000 21 .400 133.600 ("I R 22^ 1OO 136000 25^900 141 ^7O0 20200 151000 28000 151 ^710 28^500 1550000 �R 3 .so 1550010 37,200 165.00O ^OOO .00O ^OOO .00O .000 ,000 NC 0OO ^OOO ^O28 OOO 5OO ^OOO ^OOO ^OOO ^OOO ^OOO^ ^ ^ \ ' M. 7643^000 13^000 5O.00O 1794000 16O^OOO 17O.0OO 16O,OOO ,OOO � ^000 ,OOO X3 10^000 ^OOO 11000 ^OOO ^OOO ^OOO ^OOO 40^O00 40^000 ^OOO �R 40. 100 .00O 40^ 100 20.000 40,000 214500 22,700 48,000 22,20O 5O,000 CR 22^000 67^800 21 ^700 98^900 21 ^700 123,800 22000 148,900 23^ 100 149^500 X2 .0OO ^OOO 1 .00O 21 .8OO 25,5OO ^O0O ^OOO .000 ^OOO ^000 X3 1011000 ^OOO ^OOO ^OOO ^OOO ^000 ^OOO 25^000 25^O00 ^OOO Bl[ 7,O0O 11006000 21000 .000 13000000 24.7O0 0000 1313,000 20900 .00O BT , 1318^O0O 25000 ,OOO 1402000 25000 ^OOO 1487^000 25^OOO ^OOO 1521 +000 B�[ 24^200 ^OOO ,OOO ,000 .00O ,0O0 ,OOO ,000 ,000 ,OOO 1 04/22/87 11x53:13 PA Cy*E 3 NC ^OOO ^OOO ^OOO ^OOO �800 0000 ,OOO ^OOO ^OOO ^OOO X1 4114,OOO 300000 1432, 1OO 1567^3OO 1500000 150^000 150^000 ^000 ,000 ,OOO X3 10,000 ,000 ^OOO ^OOO 1.-000 ^OOO .00O 50^000 5011000 ,OOO (' R 30^000 63^000 25,000 . 7O.O0O 22^300 2704000 , 23,300 405,000 23,000 680^000 CR 20^400 1400^000 19^ 1 8OO 425^900 18^200 1432^ 100 � 161.000 1434^000 14^500 1437^4OO OR 150800 1447^8OO 150700 1475. 100 15,600 1495,800 150000 1530.4O0 14000 1555.800 ' CR 16000 1559^ 100 22000 1567000 23000 1585^600 24^800 1618^700 25^5OO 1623^200 � 25.800 1626,200 254600 1662,OOO 26^200 1773.000 26,5OO 1905^7O0 27^006 2029.900 CR 27000 2127000 26^600 2158000 26^600 2270000 26000 2390^000 26000 252O^9OO ' NC ^OOO ^000 ,025 . 10O 0300 ^000 ^OOO .000 ^OOO .000 X1 '4654^000 33^000 1492^300 1624,6OO 540^000 540^000 540^OOO '^OOO ^OOO ^OOO X3 10^000 ^OOO ,OOO ,OOO ,OOO ,OOO ^O00 5 ^0OO 5O^O0O ^0OO ' CR 3O^0OO 2O,O 25^000 300000 23,600 210^000 25^000 530^000 25^700 630^000 CR 25+000 710^000 24, 100 840^000 24,600 10904000 24.400 1300.000 234900 1356,3OO [�R 23^300 1433^ 100 22^6OO 1445^500 22^000 1447^900 22^600 1451 ^000 22^600 1471 ^500 OR 22, 1OO 1487.300 21 ,7O0 1492,300 17,000 1496^3OO 15.600 15000500 16, 1OO 15170300 OR 160300 1549^ 1OO 16^500 1579000 170000 1602000 170300 1611 .600 19^2OO 1621 ^700 OR 21 .8OO 1624^6OO 20400 1659.800 26,900 1673.7O0 27.500 1681 .O0O 26.000 1690300 OR 26^700 17010000 27^OOO 1752^400 27^500 1803,800 ^OOO ^OOO ^OOO ^OOO X1 5244,000 23^000 248,300 380,900 620.00O 5' O^OOO 590.000 ^OPP ^000 ^OOO X3 10^000 ^000 11000 ^OOO ^OOO ^000 1.000 5O^000 50^000 ^OOO C R 28^100 ,000 28.200 50.200 27^400 114, 100 26+000 162,200 24,9OO 206.400 [l�R 24^700 226^200 231-500 243^800 23^600 248,300 17^900 254^400 16^500 250000 CR 16.400 272^200 17+OOO 290.500 17^400 306.500 17,900 320.200 18,3OO 366.900 CR 22,400 380^900 23^400 396^ 1OO 27^900 424^300 28,600 448^200 29^ 100 454^4OO C."R 27,400 467,700 27^200 528,200 ' 28000 840000 ^OOO ^OOO ,OOO ,OOO NC ^OOO ^OOO ^OOO ^300 ^500 ^000 ^OOO ^OOO ^OOO ^OOO LOCAN AVENUE BRIDGE X1 5644,OOO 129000 34,000 186,000 41O,OOO 400^0OO 4009000 .000 .00O ^OOO X3 100000 WOO ^OOO ^OOO ^OOO 1000 ^OOO 32^400 32.460 ^OOO , � 27^300, ' ,000 24,1/00 34.000 ` -,� 4`%700 '48?000 -17 ,500 J31000 17,600 68.0OO. OR 17,800 98^000 18^4O0 130^000 18^600 157^OOO 22000 171 ^OOO 241900 186000 CR 27,2OO 192^4OO 32,20O 1924500 ,000 ,OOO ^OOO .00O ^OOO .00O SB 1 ^250 2^OOO 3^000 ^OOO 170^000 3^500 1243^000 ^OOO 19^400 19^400 X1 5762.000 ^OOO ,OOO ,OOO 118,000 1184000 118.000 .000 ^OOO ^000 X2, ^OOO ^OOO 1 ^000 26,9OO 32^400 ^000 ^OOO ^OOO ^OOO 11000 X3 10.000 ' ^0OO ,O0O ,OOO ,0OO .00O .000 32^400 32,400 ,OOO 2^000 ^OOO 32,400 ,OOO 192^500 32^400 ^OOO ,000 ^OOO ^OOO . X1 6012.000 17.000 26.00O 167,000 250,000 250.000 250,000 ,000 ,OOO ^OO() GR 29^ 100 ^OOO 28,800 26^OOO 20^400 30000 196500 46^OOO 19^ 100 66^OOO , CR 18,9OO 9O�.000 �18^ 1OO 121 .000 18^600 138^000 19,500 140,OOO 22,50O 146,OOO OR 22^800 156^OOO 25^200 156^010 25000 159^000 29000 167^OOO 30000 1816000 'CR 31 ^5O0 191 ^000 32000 226^O0O .000 .000 ,O0O ,000 ,VOV ^VVV J. ' 04/22/87 11 :53:13 PACE 4 / ` WILLIAMS AVENUE BRIDGE ' X1 6502^OOO 17000 34.800 177,9OO 500,OOO 480^000 490,OOO ^000 ,000 ^000 NC ^O0O ^OOO ^035 0300 ^800 ^OOO ^OOO ^OOO ,000 ^000 BRONSON WAY BRIDGE X1 7653.000 170000 50^000 179^OOO 10000 100000 10^000 .00O ^000 .00O B][ 17^000 ^OOO 40^ 10O 40^ 100 20^000 40^ 100 40^ 100 21 ^500 40^000 40^000 BT 48,000 40^000 40,000 50.000 40.000 40^000 50,O10 40,000 33.800 67^800 BT 40000 33^800 98^900 40^000 336800 123^800 4O^000 330800 148,900 40^OOO BT 33,80O 149,5OO 40000 33,800 149^510 40,000 330800 157000 40,000 33^800 BT 157^010 40000 37^400 163^000 40000 37^400 174000 40000 37^4OO 1790000 BT 40, 1OO 40^ 1OO ,OOO ,OOO ,OOO ,OOO ,OOO ,OOO ,OOO ^OOO OR 40^ 100 ^OOO 40, 1OO 20000 4O^OOO 21 ^500 40^000 48^000 40^000 50^000 OR 22,2OO 50^010 20000 67^800 21 ^700 98,900 21 ^7O0 123,800 22,600 148^900 OR 23^ 100 149^500 330800 149^510 33^800 1570000 290900 157^010 29000 163^000 OR 37^400 174000 40, 100 179,000 ,OOO 0000 ^000 ^000 ,OOO ,OOO NC ^OOO ^OOO ^025 ^OOO ^OOO ^0111)0 ^OOO ^OOO ^OOO ,OOO X1 7725^000 ^OOO ,OOO ,000 72^OOO 72^0OO 72,OOO ^OOO ,000 ,OOO X2 ,OOO ^OOO ^OOO ^000 ^000 ^OOO 10000 ^000 ^OOO ^OOO X1 7735000 150000 50^000 179^O0O 104000 100000 10,000 ,OOO ^OOO ^OOO X3 10^000 ^000 ^OOO 0000 ^000 ^OOO ,OOO 40^000 40^1000 ^OOO CR 40^ 100 ^OOO 40^ 100 20,000 40,000 21 .500 40^000 48,000 40^000 50^000 CR 22^200 5O^010 22^000 67^800 21 ,700 98^9O0 21 ^700 123^800 22^600 1M900 OR 23. 100 149^500 29.900 1570010 29000 163^0O0 37^400 174.800 40^ 100 1790000 NC ^OOO ^000 ^025 ^OOO ^OOO ^OOO ^000 ^OOO ^000 ^OOO LIBRARY X1 7845^OOO 21 ^000 3^600 167,900 1100000 100^000 110^000 ,OOO ,OOO ^OOO X3 10.000 ^0O0 ^OOO ^OOO ^OOO ^OOO ^OOO 5O,0OO 50^000 ,OOO OR 41 .300 0000 40^000 0600 30000 9,600 350500 12.500 30^400 14^500 OR 29^500 23^400 27^600 26^4O0 26000 31 ^400 23^900 32^800 22000 41 ^400 OR 22000 43^400 22,500 62,400 22, 100 88^400 21 .400 108,400 21 ^700 124,400 CR 21 ^800 128^400 230000 133^400 25000 135^400 27^200 140^400 39^000 167^900 OR 40,300 1850300 0000 ^OOO .000 ^OOO ,OOO ^000 ^OOO ,OOO 1 04/22/87 1053:13 PACE 6 SB 10050 1 ^7O0 3^000 ^OOO 101 ^000 6^000 1999^000 1 ^875 22^600 22,600 X1 8002000 ^OOO ,OOO ^OOO 157,000 157^000 157.000 .00O ,000 ,000 X2 ^OOO ^OOO 1 ^000 38^600 50^0O0 ^OOO ^OOO ^OOO ^000 ^OOO X3 1O.0OO ^OOO ,OOO ,OOO ,OOO ^OOO ^0OO 50.0OO 5O,O0O .00O BT 0000 0000 500000 ^OOO 1850300 500000 ^OOO ^OOO ^OOO ^OOO NC ^OOO ^OOO ,030 ,OOO ^OOO ,000 ^OOO ,OOO ,O0O ^000 X1 8092^000 150000 125^200 274,000 90000 800000 90^000 ,OOO ^OOO ^OOO OR 36^O0O ^OOO 32^000 2O.00O 32,4OO 100^000 31 ^900 120200 310900 125.2O0 OR 26^500 128^900 25^700 139^700 22^2OO 141 ^900 21^400 161 ,000 20600 184^500 OR 22,4OO 209^300 23,400 229^6OO 30,200 238.200 30.800 246^600 42000 274,000 NC ^OOO ^OOO ^025 ^OOO ^OOO ^OOO ^000 ^OOO ^000 ^OOO HOUSER WAY BRIDGE ' X1 8402^000 150000 27^700 156,900 2900000 310,000 3100000 .00O .00O ,000 X3 10^000 ^OOO .00O ^OOO ^000 ^OOO ^OOO 41 ^000 41 ^0O0 0000 OR 39^600 ^OOO 36,300 15,400 32, 1OO 27,700 29000 31 ^300 23^700 48^500 CR 21 ^800 57^900 21000 82,800 22^700 102^000 23^700 114^400 24^500 120^600 OR 24.800 132000 26000 137,600 27,5OO 141 ^900 36,OOO 153.400 39, 100 156.900 SB 1 ^250 1000 31000 ^000 830000 4^000 1270^000 2049 22^800 22^800 M. 8436000 .00O ,OOO ^OOO 34,000 34,000 34000 .00O .00O .00O N� X2 ^OOO ^OOO 1 ^000 35^000 41 ^000 ^OOO ^000 ^000 ^0011.) ^OOO X3 10^000 ,OOO +OOO ,OOO ,OOO ^000 ,OOO 41 .000 41 ^000 ,OOO BIT 2^000 ^000 41 ,000 ^OOO 156^9OO 41 .000 ^,0O0 ,000 ^OOO ^000 RAILROAD BRTDCE X1 8476^000 15,000 6^ 100 149. 100 40000 40^000 40^000 .O0O ^000 ,000 OR 47 ^2OO ^OOO 45^500 6^ 100 37^500 18^200 33^600 25^4O0 23,700 40^800 OR 19.500 43,900 21 ^700 70^600 22,700 92^300 23000 100000 25^000 111 . 100 OR 27,700 12O^400 33^600 131 ^000 37, 100 142^ 100 43^300 149000 48^600 173^000 NC ^O5O ^040 .O35 , 100 ^3OO ^OOO .000 .00O ^O0O ^OOO I-4O5 X1 8596^000 23^000 69^ 100 230^300 160^000 100,000 120,000 .00O ^OOO .0OO OR 49000 ^OOO 46^200 28^400 34^300 52,900 30600 69^ 100 27^900 77^400 OR 26^400 103000 60,000 103^710 60.000 109,700 25^900 109.710 23^800 133^700 OR 23^400 147^900 23^200 169^300 21 ^800 189000 21000 196,000 60^000 196010 CR 60,000 200000 21 ^900 202,010 21 ^900 205,900 24^000 213000 32.500 230^300 OR 34000 239000 36^500 260^200 36^600 288^800 ^0OO ^OOO ^00O ^OOO X1 8836^000 16^000 9^500 189,400 230.000 230^000 24O^000 ^000 ^OOO ^OOO OR 49^ 100 ^OOO 48^800 9^500 31 ^O00 34^600 30^400 60^600 28^900 73^500 OR 28^300 85^ 100 26000 91 ,500 24^700 109^200 23^600 122^200 22.800 143,400 OR 23^500 166^600 23^000 185^200 30800 189^400 34^700 195^600 35^200 220^300 OR 36^000 280^000 ^000 ,OOO ^OOO ^OOO ^00O ^OOO ^O0O ^OOO 1 04/22/87 11 :53:13 7 NC ^O5O ^050 ^044 ^000 ^OOO ^OOO .00O ^OOO ^O0O ^000 1 9446^000 16^000 8,400 136^800 57O,000 65O^000 610^000 ^000 .000 ^OOO R 51 ,000 WOO 49^800 8^400 25^800 33000 24^600 38,000 25000 51 ^500 R 24^800 72^300 24.900 9O^200 25,800 110400 26^200 113^800 26^500 117^800 R 28^900 128^300 34^300 130800 35^200 145^5O0 34^600 157^800 36^000 16O^000 � CR 40^000 190000 .000 ^000 ^000 ^OOO ^000 ,OOO ^000 ,000 ADD X - SEC AT S1[ONE14AY ENCROACHMENT 1 9736^000 2O^000 87.000 204^000 3104000 275,000 290.000 ,OOO ^OOO 1 ,000 R 40^400 ^OOO 33,900 87^000 28000 97^000 26^600 101 ^000 26^900 108^000 R 26^900 12O^000 26^600 130000 26^ 100 142.000 25^600 153^000 25^ 100 159.000 ' R 24^7OO 169^000 24 ,700 1780000 25^400 189000 28^400 195^O00 32,400 204^000 ^ R 34^000 247^000 38^000 276^000 4O^000 313^000 40000 375^000 44.000 435,000 10236^000 15 ^000 2O^000 178^200 490^000 5O0^000 500000 ,OOO ^000 ,000 55. 3OO ^000 55^000 20,000 41 ^800 34^300 28^700 48.300 27^900 52^5OO 27^5OO 71 ^900 27 ^600 101 ^000 28000 129^300 27^400 146^600 28^500 151 ^000 �~J 30^500 153^500 32000 159^000 33^200 167^200 40,200 178^200 40. 100 1930500 X1 11156^000 15000 10^000 108000 820^000 970^000 92O^000 ^OOO ^O0O ^OOO OR 48,600 3^900 41 ,300 10^000 34^000 16. 100 29^600 27.900 28^400 35^200 CR 27^800 46^900 27 ^7O0 59^600 28^000 78^200 27,800 90^600 29000 95^800 OR 38.900 108^700 39.300 115^500 39. 100 143^600 40^600 157. 100 44000 310.000 �J ,OOO ^OOO ^OOO ^OOO ^OOO ^OOO ^000 ^OOO ^0OO ^000 1 04/22/87 11x53:13 PAC� 8 S}�CNO D�P�H CWS�� CRIWS WSELD �C HV H� O�OSS BAND ���V Q Q�OB QCH QROB A�OB ACH AROB VOl. TWA � 1`1 11,/RIG,1--!11, TIME V�OB VCH VROB XNL XNCH XNR W�N ELMIN SS�A S�OP� XLOBL XLCH XWBR ITRIAL IDC ICONT CORAR TOPWID ENDS"!' *PROF 1 CCHV= ^300 CHHV= 1 ,000 *SECNO 1. 100 3495 OVERBAND AREA ASSUMED NON-E},FECTIVE/ELLEA= 22^70 ELREA= 22^70 LHXb till ASH1MUIUM ^ 10 11 ,46 14^26 ,OO 14^00 15^80 1 ^53 ,OO ^00 17.4O 85300 O, 8530^ O^ O^ 858^ O^ O^ O^ 18^20 ^OO ,00 9^94 ^OO ,035 ^025 ^035 ^OOO 2^80 35^ 17 ^003047 O^ O^ O^ O O 3 ^OO 155, 14 190^31 O CCHV= ^3OO C�HV= .5OO SPECIAL BRTDCE 5227 DOWNSTREAM ELEV IS 12^63 /NOT 14.26 HYDRAULIC JUMP ( IF FLOW CON�RO�S) SB XD XDOR CO�Q RD��N BWC BWP BAR�A SS �LCHU �LCHD 1 ^25 1 ^50 3^00 ^OO 16000 8^00 1495^00 ^OO 8^90 8^90 *SECNO 62^000 CLASS B LOW FLOW 3420 BRIDGE W,S. = 13^51 BRIDGE VELOCITY- / 12 ^ 18 CALCULATED CHANNEL AREA= / 700^ ECPRS J-3CLWC H3 QWEI R E A TRAPEZOID ELLC ELTRD AREA ^OO 15^98 ^00 0^ 8530^ 1495^ 1490^ 1800 2200 ,= 3495 OVERBAND AREA ASSUMED NON-EFFECTIVE/ELLEA= 22,70 ELREA= 22,70 U/S END OF NOR�H BO�IN� BRIDC� �� 62^00 11 .84 14 ^64 ^OO ^OO 15.98 1 ^35 ^ 18 ^OO 17^40 8530^ O^ 8530^ O^ O^ 916^ O^ 1 ^ O^ 18^20 ^OO ,OO 9^31 ^OO ^0OO ^025 .00O ^OOO 2^80 34^43 ^O02475 62^ 62^ 62^ O O O ,OO 155^94 190^37 O *SECNO 892^000 89000 6^45 16,75 ^00 ^00 18^29 1 ,54 2^21 ^ 10 18^60 8530^ O, 8530^ O^ O^ 856, O^ 18^ 3^ 17 ^40 ^02 ,00 9^97 ^00 ^035 ^025 ^035 ^OOO 10^30 111 ^85 ^O02871 84O^ 830^ 830^ 2 O O ^00 14709 259^64 O 1 04/22/87 11 :53:13 PACE 9 SECNO DEPTH CWSEL CRIWS WSELD C HV HL OLOSS BAND ELEV Q QL ACH AROB VOL TWA LEFT/RIGHT TIME VLOB VCH VROB XN� XNCH XNR E SSTA ST-OPE X�OBL XLCH XLOBR !TRIAL IDC ICONT CORAR TOPWID ENDS� �� `� CCHV= ^ 1O0 (:'El--IV::: ^3OO *SECNO 1612,000 3265 DIVIDED FLOW �� �� 3301 HV MORE �HAN HVINS 1612^00 7^79 18079 .00 ^OO 19^67 ^89 1 ^32 ,07 18^40 8530^ 1 ^ 8436^ 93^ 2^ 1111 ^ 67 ^ 35^ 6^ 16^40 ^O5 ,39 7^60 1 .39 ,045 ^025 ,045 000 11 ^00 252^85 ,001265 720^ 720^ 740^ 2 O O ^OO 235^64 594^76 O *SECNO 2532^000 2532^00 7,53 19^93 ^00 000 21 ^22 1 ^29 1 ^43 ^ 12 19, 10 8530. O^ 8530. 00 O^ 935. O^ 57^ 10^ 19^30 ^O8 ^OO 9^ 12 000 ^045 ^025 ^045 ^OOO 12^40 126O^5O .001959 920^ 920^ 950, 2 O O .00 141 ,40 1401 ^90 O / *SECNO 3380000 3495 OVERBAND AREA ASSUMED NON-E},FECTIVE/El.LEA= 50^00 ELREA= 50^00 3382^00 9031 21 ^51 ^OO ^OO 22^78 1 ^27 1 ^56 ^OO 18,40 85300 O, 8530^ O. O^ 942, O^ 76, 13. 18,50 ` ^ 11 ^OO 906 ^OO ^045 ^025 ^045 ^OOO 1020 123200 0001715 850^ 850^ 840, 2 O 0 ^OO 130^90 1362.90 O CCHV= ,300 CEHV= ,500 *SECNO 3902000 3280 CROSS SECTION 390000 EXTENDED 1 ^49 FEET 3495 OVERBAND AREA ASSUMED NON-EFFECTIVE/ELLEA= 25^50 El.REA= 2500 . � SOUTH BOEINC BRIDGE 390200 8^79 22^79 ,OO .00 23,67 088 ,77 , 12 25.00 8530^ O^ 8530^ O^ O^ 1134^ O^ 88^ 15^ 2500 ^ 12 .00 7^52 ^OO .045 ^025 .045 ^OOO 14^00 1319,03 ^OO1287 520^ 520, 520^ 2 O O ^OO 166^81 1485^84 O �r 1 04/22/87 1103:13 PACE 1O SDCNO DEP11 CWSEL CRI I'll S WSELD EC Hy 01.10SS BAND E L EV Q QLOB QCH QROB A�OB ACH AROB VOL �WA TIME VLOB VCH VROB XNL XNCH XNR WTN ELMIN SSTA SLOPE XLOBL XLCH XLOBR ITRIAl. I C I ORAR TOPWID SNDS� SPECIAL BRIDGE ' SB XD XDOF BWP BAREA SS ELCHU ELCHD 105 1080 3^00 ^00 118^00 WOO 902^00 3^85 15^31 ' 15^31 3960000 3280 CROSS SECTION 3964,00 EXTENDED 3^46 FEET PRESSURE FLOW ECPRS ECl.WC H3 QWEIR QPR BAREA TRAPEZOID El.LC El.TRD AREA 2509 23^75 ^ 11 00 85300 902, 902^ 21 ^80 25950 3495 OVERBAND AREA ASSUMED NON-EF}:ECTIVE/ELLEA= 25^00 ELREA= 25.00 396400 1006 2406 000 ^OO 25^29 ^53 102 ^OO 25^OO 8530, 0. 8530, O, O, 1464^ O^ 900 15^ 25^00 ^ 13 ^OO 5^83 000 ^OOO 6025 ^000 ^OOO 14^00 1318^ 11 .000567 62. 62^ 60, 4 O O .00 16807 1486,88 O CCHV= ,300 CEHV= ^800 3495 OVERBAND AREA ASSUMED NON-EFFECTIVE/ELLEA= 5O,00 ELREA= 50.00 4114^00 10^32 2402 ^OO ^OO 25^55 ^73 010 06 18^20 8530^ 00 85300 O, O. 1242^ O, 95, 16^ 22^30 5� ^ 13 ^OO 6^87 ^OO ^04 0025 ^045 0000 . 1400 1432^ 1O 0000719 1500 1500 1500 2 O 0 .00 135^20 1567^3O O CCHV= 000 CEHV= ^300 *SECNO 4654000 3495 OVERBAND AREA ASSUMED NON-EFFECTIVE/ELLEA= 5000 HLREA= 50000 4654^00 9055 25^ 15 ,OO ^OO 26^O6 ^9O ,45 005 2100 85300 O, 8530^ O, O^ 1118, O^ 1090 17^ 21 ^80 ^ 15 ^OO 7,61 .00 ^045 ^025 ^045 ^OOO 15^60 1492^30 0000993 540. 540, 540. 1 0 O .00 13200 1624.60 O J. 04/22/87 11 :53:13 PACE 11 S�CNO DHPTH CWSE,L CRIWS WSELD BC ]--IV HL O�OSS BAND ElEV Q Q�OB ('.)CH QROB Al.OB ACH AROB VOL TWA LEFT/RIGHT TIME VLOB VCH VROB XNL XNCH XNR W1[14 ELMIN SSTA SLOPE XLOBL -X�CH XLOBR ITRIAL IDC WONT CORAR TOPWID ENDST . ' ` *SECNO 5244^O00 3495 OVERBAND AREA ASSUMED NON-E}'FECTIVE/ElJ.EA= 5000 ELREA= 50,00 5244^OO 9^31 2501 ^OO ^OO 26^77 1 ^06 ^66 605 2300 8530^ O^ 8 1 530^ O^ 0^ 034^ O^ 124. ' 19, 22^40 ^ 17 ^OO Q25 ^OO ,O45 025 ^045 ^OOO 16^40' 248^3O ^061284 620. 5900 550 2 O 0 000 132^60 380.90 . O ` CCHV= ^300 CEHV= 1500 ' *SECNO 5644000 '^ 3495 OVERBAND AREA ASSUMED NON-EFFECTIVE pELLEA= 32^4O ELREA= 32^40 LOCAN AVEI%I ]E BRIDGE 5644100 8.86 26,36 .00 ^ ^00 27,31 095 051 ^ . .03 26^ 1O - , ~ 85306 - �� 'O^' `8530^ O. ^ -' O^- '� �L089i � ^ ' 00 ' '133� ' `'I�)^ 24^90 ' 019 .00 7^83 ,OO ^045 ,025 ,045 ^OOO 17^50 MOO ^OO1285 410^ 400^ 400^ 2 O O ^OO 15200 186^00 O SPECIAL BPTDGE ' SB XD XDOR RDLEN BWC BWP BAREA SS 1 ^25 2^00 3^00 ^OO 170^00 3050 124300 ^OO 19^40 19^4O *SECNO 5762000 PRESSURE FLOW -~ . ECPRS ECLWC 113 QWEIR QPR BAREA TRAPEZOID El.LC El.TRD AREA 27*82 27^38 010 00 853O^ 1243^ 1249^ 26^90 32^40 , . ' 3495 OVERBAND AREA ASSUMED NON-;FFUCTIVE/ELl.EA= 040 ELREA= 32,40 8530^ O^ 853O^ O, O^ 1190, O^ 137, 21 , 24^9O ^ 19 ^OO 7^ 17 ,OO ^OOO ^025 ^OOO ^OOO 17,50 34,00 ^000957 118, 118^ 1180 3 O O ,OO 152,00 18600 O 1 04/22/87 11 :53:13 ' PAGE 12 SECNO DEPTH CWSEL CRIWS WSElK EC HV I.-IL OLOSS BAND ELEV Q QLOB QCH QROB ALOB ACH AROB VOL TWA LEFT/RIGHT ' TIME VLOB VCH VROB XN� XNCH XNR W�N SSTA Sl.OPE X�OBL XLCH XLOBR ITRIAL IDC ICONT CORAR TOPWID ENDST ' *SECNO 6012000 6012^OO 9003 2703 ,OO .00 28.32 1019 .31 ^20 28080 8530^ O^ 8530^ O^ O, 974^ O^ 143^ 21 ^ 29^8O ` ,20 .00 805 000 ^045 ^025 ^045 ^OOO 18^ 10 27.98 ^001641 250^ 250^ 250, 2 O O ^OO 134^28 162^26 O *SBCNO 6502.000 . 3495 OVERBAND AREA ASSUMED NON-EFFECTIVE/EL].EA= 3080 El.REA= 34,80 ' WILLIAMS AVENUE BRIDGE ' 6502^00 M83 27^93 000 ^OO 29.21 1 ,27 ,84 ,04 34.80 ' 85306 O^ 85300 O^ O^ 942^ O^ 154^ 23^ 34600 ^22 .00 9^06 .00 ,045 ,025 ,045 0000 19010 39.64 ^001789 5000 490^ 480^ 2 O O ^OO 132^86 172,51 O / SPECIAl. BRIDGE ' SB XD XDOR CO�Q RD��N BWC BWP BAREA SS ELCHU ELCHD ` ^90 1030 3.00 ^OO 114^00 . 1100 129000 1 ^26 20^OO 20^OO *SECNO 6541 ,0OO CLASS A LOW FLOW ' 3420 BRIDGE W.S, = 27^48 BRIDGE VELOCITY= / 10015 CALCULATED - CHANNEL AREA- / 841 . ECPRS ~ EC�WC H3 ` � '� . QW�IR 'Q�OW BA0GA TRAPEZOID ElJC EARD ' AREA 000 29^47 ^40 00 85300 1296^ 1298^ 31010 34,80 3495 OVERBAND AREA ASSUMED NON-EFFECTIVE/ELLEA= 3400 ELREA= 3400 ' � 6541 ^00 9^23 2803 ^OO ^00 29^47 1 ^ 14 ^26 ^OO 34^8O 8530^ O, 85300 O^ O^ 994^ O^ 154. 23^ 34^OO ^22 ^OO 8^58 ^OO 0000 ^025 ^OOO ^OOO 19^ 10 38^65 ' 1001513 39. 390 39. O O O ,OO 13306 172^51 . O *SECNO 6681 ,O0O ' � 6681 ^00 9.O9 28^49 ^00 ^OO 29.76 1 ^27 .23 ^06 31030 85300 O^ 8530^ O^ O^ 942^ O^ 1586 24^ 33^90 , ,22 .00 9^05 .00 1045 .025 .045 ^OOO 19^40 11 .81 ^OO1733 140^ 140^ 150^ 2 O O ,OO 126^49 138^30 ' O 1 ' 04/22/87 11x53:13 PAGE 13 ^ O OO^GST T94Z3T 004 O O 3 ^ORC ^08C ^O�C T�TTOO^ 6C^/!3 OC^ T3 0000 WOO 03O^ GVO^ 000 8T ^6 OO^ �3^ O3^ZC 093 MT 00 ^636 ^O ^O 406G8 ^O 40CG8 0O^GC 900 3G^ TC^ T GT ^ TC 000 OO^ P8^63 VS^8 00008M 000960M ON33S* O ' 0609T GG06CT OO^ O O 3 ^OCT 403T ^031 TT9TO04 GC^G3 09403 OOO^ SPO^ G300 SPO^ PVT Z908 006 P3^ 060Z3 4G3 WT ^z � ^C86 ^O ^OT 403gJ +O 40CG8 090CC 60^ 9T ^ 9T ^ T ZG^OC 000 000 TP+63 T8^8 OO^COU 000^C0M 01,133S* ' OOV^ =AH33 OOT ^ =AH33 � �S�N3 OIMJOl 8V803 11,103I 3OI IVIHM 88O7X H37X 7807X 3JO7S ViSS NIW73 NIM MIX H3NX 7NX 808A H3A 8O7A 341I� VMI 'IOA 808V H3V 8O1V 8O8O H30 8076 O A3I3 DNV8 SS010 7H AH "T3 D73SM SMI83 73SM3 HId3O OHMS, VT 330.1 CT:60TT W/33/P0 T 0 OO^VCT 004V3T OO^ O 0 3 ^OT ^OT ^OT 9ZOT004 TO^OT OG^6T OOO^ WOO WOO GPO^ OO^ 38V 000 C3^ O309C ^V3 ^G9T ^O ^ 160T ^O ^O 40Cg3 ^O 40CG8 060GC TOO TOO G6^ CC^OC 004 OO^ 86063 88^6 00^C869 ' 00006869 01433S* 0 OO^t'CT OO^ T3T OO^ O 0 3 ^3V ^W ^W 36XT004 TO^OT OS46T ' OOO^ SPO^ OCO^ GVO^ OO^ OO^R OO^ C3^ � 0309C ^V3 ^19T ^O 09901 ^O 'O ^OCG8 ^O 00CG8 ^ 064SC TOO . '8O^ 660 0C^OC OO^ OO^ TC063 T8^6 004CZ69 � 0349C MIT XVW 060GC w8n3 NIW PT =00N/gnOI88 'lVWHON MCC ' ` a3OIAIO G93C ' i O0O^CZ69 OHMS* ' O . OO^VCT 00^ T3T OO^ O O 01 ^OT ^OT ^OT 9gRT007 TO^0T' O�^6T - �<X)O^ ���0^ OCO^ ���O^ '00^ OT ^8 DO/ ` C3� ' O349C 4V3 ^C9T 40 ^CGOT ^O ^O ^OC�8 ^O 00CQ8 MOSS 3O^ T0^ 30^ T 3MOMOO^ 00+ O3063 OZ^6^ 0001669 , ' 3oOI88 3ON3AV Si73M / O3096 =3173 MIAO6^GC =O81'l3 NIW VT =O8N 3naI88 'lVW8ON OzCC MO7d O3aIAIO s93C ` . 000^ TC69 ON33S* O08^ =AH33 006^ =AH33 ' O O0^VCT 004V3T OO^ O O 3 ^OP3 M3 ^Ov3 TGTTOO^ T0^OT OS46T 0004 SPO^ S3O^ ' GVO^ OO^` 660Z 000 C3^ ` O309C ^V3 ^C9T ^O 0890T ^O ^O ^OCgJ ^O 40Cg3 060SC 800 vs* 66^ 8T ^OC 000 00' 6T ^6Z 6906 006T369 OOO^ T369 0N33S* ` ' ` J�SON3 UIMJOl 8V803 IN03I 3OI 7I81I 88O7X H31D( 10O7X 3JO'lS ` V�SS NIW�3 N�M 8NX H3NX 7NX 8D8A H3A 807A 3WI�� -RM-.IV-- H3\y---- �D]^l�� - 8O8O- - --1�3O RO'DE) O -- '- ' �--�- ' A373 DNV8 SS010 7H AH OR DI3SM SMI83 73SM3 HlJ3O OHMS �� *SECNO 7643^000 - 3495 OVERBAND AREA ASSUMED NON-EFFSCTIVE/ELl.EA= 40^00 El.REA= 40,00 764300 8^23 29^93 000 000 31 ^61 1 ^68 ^28 As 2020 8530^ O^ 8530. O^ O, 821 , O, 179. 26^ 40^ 10 ^25 ^OO 10039 ^OO ^045 028 ^045 ^000 2100 50^00 ,002813 160. 160^ 1700 2 O O .00 113005 163,O5 O CCHV= ^300 CGHV= 0800 *SECNO 7653^O0O 3265 DIVIDED FLOW 3370 NORMAL BRIDCE/NRD= 17 MIN ELTRD= 4000 MAX ELLC= 40. 1O _ BRONSON WAY BRIDGE 7653^OO 8,25 29^95 .00 ^00 31 ,72 1 ^78 .04 ^08 4O^00 85300 00 8530^ O^ O^ 798^ O^ 179^ 26^ 40^ 10 ^25 ^OO 10^70 ,OO ,045 ,035 .045 ^OOO 21 ^70 50001 ^OO5102 100 100 10. OO 105^57 163^08 ` O *SECNO 7725000 1 04/22/87 11x53:13 PACE 15 ` SECNO DEPTH CWSEL CRIWS WSELD BC HV H� 011j BAND ELEV Q Q�OB QCH QROB A�OB ACH AROB VOL �WA LEFT/RICH� TIME VLOB VCH VROB XNl. XNCH XNR W�N ��MIN SS�A Sl.OP}� XLOBL XLCH XLOBR ITRIAl. IDC ICONT CORAR TOPWID ENDST 3265 DIVIDED FLOW 3370 NORMAL BRIDCE/NRD= 17 MIN El.TRD= 4000 MAX ELl.C= 40^ 1O 7725^OO 8^76 30^46 ^OO ^OO 32^02 1 ^56 ^23 ^07 40,0O 85300 O^ 8530^ O. O^ 852^ O^ 181 . 27^ 40, 10 ^25 ^OO 10001 000 ^045 ^025 ,045 000 21 ^70 50001 ,002147 72. 72^ 70 2 O 0 ,OO 106,38 163,89 O , *SBCNO 7735.000 3495 OVERBANK AREA ASSUMED NON-EFFECTIVE/ELLEA= 40^0O ELREA= 40^00 773500 9105 3005 ^OO ^OO 32.10 1035 ^02 ^06 40^00 8530. O, 85300 0. 00' 914, O^ 181 .' 27^ 40^ 10 0 25 ^OO 9^33 ^OO ^045 0025 ^045 ^000 21 ^70 50001 ' ^OO1751 100 100 10, 2 O O ,OO 114^34 16034 O *SECNO 7845000 3495 OVERBAND AREA ASSUMED NON-EFFECTIVE/El.LEA= 5000 ELREA= 50^00 LIBRARY _ 7845^OO 9^86 31 ^26 .00 ,OO 32.35 1009 , 17 ^08 40.00 85300 O^ 85300 O^ O^ 1017^ O^ 1830 27^ 39000 ^26 ,OO 8^39 .00 ^045 ^025 ,045 ^OOO 21 ^40 14, 16 ^OO1430 110^ 110^ 1001. 2 O O ^OO 135^70 149^87, O SB XD XDOR CO},Q RD��N BWC BAR}�A SS ��CHU ��CHD 1105 1070 3000 ^OO 101 ^00 6^00 1999^00 1 ^88 22^60 22^60 - *SECNO 8002^000 ^ C�ASS A D]W FLOW 3420 BRIDGE W.S. - 31007 BRIDGE NGl.00ITY= / 9^08 CALCULATED CHANNEL AREA= / 939, 1 04/22/87 11x53x13 PACE 16 - S�CNO DEPTH RIWS WSELD BC ]--IV H� O1.OSS BAND E L EV Q QLOB QCH QROB Al.OB ACH AROB VOl. 'L E},T/RI�H� TIME V�OB VCH VROB XN� XNCH XNR SSTA Sl.OPE XLOBl. XLCH XLOBR I1CRIAl. IDC ICONT CORAR TOPWID ENDST l�CPRS l�C�WC H3 QW}�IR Q�OW BAREA TRAPEZOID ELLC El.TRD AREA ^OO 3200 020 O^ 8530^ 1999^ 20000 38^60 50600 3495 OVERBAND AREA ASSUMED NON-EFFECTIVE/El.LEA- 5000 El.REA= 50^00 800000 10^06 31 ^46 ^OO ^OO 32^50 1 ^04 015 ^OO 40^00 85300 00 8530^ O, O^ 1043, O^ 187^ 27^ 39,00 ^26 ^OO 807 ^OO ^OOO ^025 ^OOO ^OOO 21 ^40 14^08 ^OO1321 157, 157^ 157. O O O ,OO 136^24 150,33 N� *SECNO 8092^000 8092^00 9936 31 ,56 ,OO ' ^00 32^88 1 ^32 , 16 ^22 31090 85300 O^ 8530^ O^ O^ 927^ O^ 189^ 28^ 4200 ^27 00 9,21 .00 ^045 0030 ,045 ^OOO 22^20 125,43 ^002524 900 90^ 80^ 1 O O ^OO 123^06 248^49 O *8GCNO 8402,000 3495 OVERBAND AREA ASSUMED NON-EFFECTIVE/ELLEA= 4100 El.REA= 41 ,00 HOUSER WAY BRIDGE _ 840200 10070 32^30 ,OO ^OO 33,49 1019 .57 ^04 32010 85309 O^ 8530^ O^ 00 976^ O^ 196^ 29^ 3900 ^27 ^00 804 ^OO ^045 ^025 ,045 .00O 21 .60 27,7O ^001389 290^ 310^ 3101. 2 O O ,OO 120^70 148^40 O SPECIAl. BRIDGE SB XD XDOR C3110 RDLEN BWC BWP BAREA SS ELCHU El.CHD 1 ^25 100 3000 ,OO 8300 4^00 1270^00 2^05 22^80 2200 *S�CNO 8430000 CLASS A LOW FLOW 3420 BRIDGE W,S, = 3205 BRIDGE VELOCITY- / 9^29 CALCULATED CHANNEL AREA= / 918, 1 . 04/22/87 1103x13 PACE 17 �� = SECNO DEPTH CWSEL CRIWS WSELD EC HV HL OLOSS BAND ELEV Q QLOB QCH QRDB Al.OB ACH AROB VOL TWA LEFT/RIGHT TIME VLOB VCH VROB XNL XNCH XNR W"11 E L III N SSTA . �CPRS EG�W A ELL(:.'C H3 QW�IR QLOW BAR� TRAPEZOID ELL(:.' ELTRD ` ' AREA 000 33^64 ^22 . O, 8530^ 1270^ 1269^ 35^00 41 ^00 3495 OVERBAND AREA ASSUMED NON-EFFECTIVE/ELLEA= 41 ^00 El.REA= 41 .00 ' 8436^00 10^92 32^52 .00 ^OO 33^64 1 ^ 12 ^ 16 ^OO 32^ 1O 8530, O. 8530i O. 00 1003^ O, 1970 299 39, 10 ^28 ^OO 8051 ,OOO ^025 ^OOO ^000 21 ^60 27970 ^OO1276 34, 34^ 34, O O O .00 12O^99 148,69 O ' ' CCHV= ,300 CEHV= ,870 *SBCNO8476^OOO ' RAILROAD BRIDGE � � 8476,00 13,03 32.53 ,OO ^OO' 34,00 1 ^46 ,06 .29 45,50 ` 8530^ O^ 85304 O^ 00 , 8790 O^ 197^ 29^ 4300 ^28 ,OO 9070 .00 .O45 9025 _ 1045 ^_� ^0OO , , 19^��) -27.<�� (y ` - ^ �16�)9 ' -'� . ^ '' - ^-� - 4O^ �- �� � O ^OO 1O2^O3 129^O9 � O ^ CCHV= . 100 CGHV= ^300 . . ' *SECNO 85969000 3265 DIVIDED FLOW ' ' 5301 HV CHANCED MORE THAN HVINS ' I-4O5 8596,OO 11 .79 33^59 .00 ^00 34,29 ^69 ,21 008 34,60 ^' 8530^ 00 8527^ 3^ 0, 1277^ 2, 200^ 29^ 32^50 ^28 ,OO 6^68 1 .08 .050 ,035 ,04O 0000 21 ^80 7035 ' ^OO1962 160. 120^ 100^ 3 O O ^OO 152^37 234^73 *SECNO 8836^O0O 8836,OO 11 .22 34^02 .00 ^OO 34.76 ^74 .46 001 48,80 ` 8530^ O, 8530^ O^ O^ 1234^ O^ 207^ 30^ 3400 ' ^29 .0O 6^91 ^OO 0050 ,035 .040 ^OOO 22^80 30035 1.001855 230^ 240^ 230^ O O O ^OO | 58^77 189, 12 ` O ' 1 04/22/87 11 :53:13 PACE 18 SECNO DEPTH CWSEl. CRIWS WSE[D EC HV HL OL OSS BAND El.EV Q Q131.3 ()CH QROB ALOB ACH AROB VOL TWA LEFT/RIGHT �IME V�OB VCH VROB XNl. XNCH XNR W�N ��MIN SS��A SLOPE XLDBL XLCH Xl.OBR ITRIAL IDC ICONT CORAR TOPWID ENDS� *SECNO 9440000 9446^00 10970 35.3O ,OO ^OO ` 36.0 1009 1 .52 , 10 49,8O 653O^ O^ 8520^ 10^ ' O^ 1017^ 10^ 223^ 32^ 3030 ^31 000 8038 1005 .050 ^044 0050 ^OOO 24^60 23,57 ^003525 570^ 610^ 650^ 2 O O ^OO 135^32 158089 O . *SECNO 9736,OOO ADD X - SEC AT STONEWAY ENCROACHMENT ' 9736^00 11 ^78 3048 ^OO ^00 37^21 ^73 079 ,04 33^90 8530, 74. 7986^ 470. 45^ 1133. 164^ 231 ^ 33, 32^40 ^32 1 ^65 7^05 207 0050 ^044 ^050 ^0OO 24^70 5208 ^002192 - 210^ 298. 275. -' 2 0 . 0 ----^O0 212~65 '26 --_ -- - -- '' 200^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X - ^ ^ ^ W E 16 205^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X ^ ^ W E ^ ^ ^ ^ BANK . 210^ ^ ^ , ^ , X ^ ^ W 215^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X ^ ^ W 220, ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X ^ , W 225^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X ^ ^ W }� 230^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X ^ ^ W 235 ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X ^ ^ W E ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 240^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X^ ^ W E 17 245 ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X ^ W � ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 250^ ^ ^ , ^ ^ ^ X ^ W ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 255^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X ^ W E ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 260^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X W E 265^ ^ ^ ^ , ^ ^ ^ X E 270^ 18 275^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X ^ ^ ^ ^ 280^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^X 285 ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X ^ ^ ^ ^ 290^ ^ ^ . ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X ^ ^ ^ ^ 295^ ^ ^ , ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X ^ ^ ^ ^ 300^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X ^ ^ ^ ^ 305^ ^ ^ - ^ ^ ^ ^ , X ^ ^ ^ ^ 310^ ^ ^ , ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X^ ^ ^ ^ 19 315^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X ^ ^ ^ 320^ 325 ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ , I. X ^ ^ ^ 330^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X 335^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X ^ ^ ^ 340^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X ^ ^ ^ 345^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X 350^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X ^ ^ ^ 355^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X ^ ^ ^ 360^ , ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X ^ ^ ^ 365^ 370^ , ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ . X^ ^ ^ 20 375^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X ^ ^ 380^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^X ^ ^ 385^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ , ^ X ^ ^ 39O, ^ , ^ ^ ^ , ^ ^ ^ ^ X ^ ^ 395 ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X ^ ^ 400^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X ^ , 405^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X ^ ^ 410^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X ^ ^ 415^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X ^ ^ 420^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ , ^ ^ ^ X ^ ^ 425^ , ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X ^ ^ 430^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X ^ ^ 21 435^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X ^ NRD= O ELLC= 9999999^00 HLTRD= 9999999^00 EL( I ) /STA( I ) 4O ^40 ^OO 33^90 87 ^00 28^60 97^00 26^60 101 ^00 26^90 108^00 26 ^90 120^00 26^60 13200 26^ 10 142^00 2500 153,00 25^ 10 159^0O - 24^70 169^00 24,70 178.00 25^4O 189^00 2040 195^00 32^40 204 ^00 34^00 24700 38^00 276^00 4O^00 313^00 4200 375^00 44^00 435 ^0O 1 PROFILE FOR STREAM CEDAR RIVER-100 YR FLOW wo Fri LZ o k 0 c) ^� FLOOZ PIOTTED POINTS (BY PR]]]BITY) -E-ENERGY/W-WATER SURFACE/I-INVERT/C-CRITICAL W,S^ /L-LEFT BAND/R-RIGHT BAND/M-LOWHR END STA ' � E L EVATION 15^ 20^ 25^ 30 ^ 35^ 4O^ ' ' 1 �'636^OO 10,26 -� 3/.66 .00 ^OO 38,5O ^84 1 ,25 ^O3 55.00 ' - ` 0 8530 O O 1159 O ' 245 ^ � 853O^ ^ � ^ ^� ^ ^ ^ / ' -� ^ � ' - --^ .0O 7.36 ,0O ,O5O ^O44 .O50 ^OOO 27,40 - ^O028Z�_ 49O^ 5OO^ 500^ 2 O ` O ,OO 135^47 `~�174^2O O ' *8GCNO 111561-000 11156,0O 12,48 40^ 18 ^OO ^OO 41 .26 1 ^08 2.69 ^07 41 .30 853O^ O, 8468^ 62^ O^ 1O14^ 4O^ 269^ 38^ 38^90 \ ,00 8^35 1 +55 /05O ,044 ,050 ^000 27,70 10,94 ^002972 820^ 9201. 970^ 2 O O ^OO 142^39 153^33 O ' -�~ ��Q� �L~*� ���� ���� ' 1 , ~"a' ��^ ��~�~°~~�� ~ - ^~ ~- -^ "`"�^�~ ^- " ~~Mk°~-~OA*/ . CROSS SECI'ION 9736^O0 . STR}�AM CEDAR RIV}�R-10O YR FLOW DISCHARG E:-.: 853O, ' P�O���D POIN�S (BY PRIORI�Y) -B=BO��OM BRIDC�/�=�OP BRID��/X=�ROUND/WWA��R SUR/�=�N�RCY �RADI�N�/C=CRI�ICA� WSEL ' - ElEV 24^ 26^ 28^ 30. 32^ 34 36^ ' �8� _ 4O^ ` / 42^ STA-F E ET ' ' X ^ ^ ^ X ^ ^ ^ . 5^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X ^ ^ ^ , X ^ ^ ^ ^ 15^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 2O^ X ^ ^ ^ - ^ , � , , , , , , `25 /}� ~ ^ ^ ^ � ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ~- ^ X X ^ ^ ^ ` 3 O^ ^ ^ � ^ ^ ' ^ �^ ^ ^ ^ X ^ ^ ^ 35 ^^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ C. ^ ^ 40^ 45 X}G ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ � ^ � ^ ^ � `^ ^ ^ X }� ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 55^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 6O^ X W }� ^ ^ ^ ` � ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 6 W � 5^ ^� ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X ^ ^ ^ ` 7O X W }� ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 75^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X ^ W E ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 8O X W }� ^ ^ ^ ^ , ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ W � ^ ^ BAND^ 90 W }� ^ ^ ^ , ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 4 95^ 5 100^ ^ ^ Xr---- , ^ ^ ^ , W E ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 1050 , ^ X ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ W E ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 6 110^ , ^ X , ^ ^ ^ ^ W E 115^ ^ ^ X ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ W E ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 7 1201% . . X , ^ ^ ^ ' ^ W E 125, ^ ^ X � ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ W E W }� ^ 8 13O+ ^ ^ X , ^ ^ ^ + 135^ ^ ^ X ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ W E ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 9 140, , ^X , , W E 145^ ^ X^ ^ ^ ^ ' ^ W E. ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 150^ , X ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ W E W }� ^ ^ 1O 155^ ^ X ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 11 160^ ^ X W 165^ ^ X ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ W E 12 170^ , X ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ , W 8 ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 175^ ^ X ^ ^ ^ W �� 13 1801 . X ^ ^ , , + ^ W E 185^ , X ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ , W ]G ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 14 190. W }� ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 3250, ^ C ^ ^ I . ^ l. ^ W ]G M^ ^ ^ ^ 3300. , C ^ , I , l. ^ W 13 M^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 33500 ^ C C. ^ W ]G M 3382^OO 3400^ ^ C ^ ^ W 1`3 M � 3450^ ^ C ^ , I ^ l. ^ W E M^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 3500. , C ^ ^ I ' ^ l.R W E M C ^ ^ I ^ ^l^ W E M ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 3600, ^ C , , I ^ ^ l. W EM ^ 3650^ ^ C C. ^ I ^ ^ l.W E ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 3700^ ^ C ^ + I ^ + WRME ^ ^ ^ ^ 3750^ ^ C ^ ^ I ^ ^ WlJG ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 3800^ , C ^ ^ I ^ ^ MW E 38500 ^ C ^ ^ I ^ ^ MW EL ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 3900, , C ^ ^ I ^ ^ M W 13 l.R 3902100 3950^ ^ C ^ ^ I ^ ^ M WE l. ^ ^ ^ ^ 3964^00 4000, . C ^ ^ I ^ ^ M WE 4050, ^ C ^ ^ I ^ ^ lJ` R 1,111.3 ^ ^ ^ ^ 4100, ^ C l. R WE 4114,(X} 4150, ^ C ^ ^ I ^ L ^ R WE M 4200. ^ C I ^ l. ^ R WE M 4250^ ^ C ^ I ^ l. ^ R WE M ^ ^ ^ ^ 4300, . C ^ ^ I l' ^ R WE M 4350^ ^ C ^ ^ I L^ R WE M ^ ^ ^ ^ 4400, . ' C l. R W E M 4450^ ^ C l. R W E M ^ ^ ^ ^ 4500^ , C , , ' I R- W E' 1*11 4550^ ^ C ^ ^ ^ I ^ l. R W E M ^ ^ ^ ^ 46004 ^ C ^ , , I ^ L R W E M 4650^ ^ C ^ ^ ^ I ^ l.R W E M ^ ^ ^ ^ 4654^OO 47OO^ , C.- �R . W � M ^ ^ ^ ^ 4750^ ^ C ^ . ^ I ^ l. W E tel ^ ^ ^ ^ 4800^ ^ C , 01 , I ^ l. WE M 4850^ ^ C ^ ^ � ^ I ^ l. ^till E M ^ ^ ^ ^ 4900, . C ^ , ^ I ^ R]. ^W E M 4950^ ' ^ C ^ ^ � ' ^ I ^ RL ^W E M 5000. C� � ^ ' , ^ I , Rl. ^W, 1'... M 5050^ ^ C ^ ^ , I ^ R l. ^W M ^ ^ ^ ^ 5100. ^ C ^ , ^ I ^ R L ^W E M 51500 ^ C ^ ^ ^ I ^ Rl ^W E M ^ ^ ^ ^ 5200^ ' , C ^ ^ ^ I ^ R L ^W E M ^ ^ ^ ^ 5244^OO 5250^ ^ C ^ ^ ^ I ^ R l. ^W E M ^ ^ ^ ^ 53000 ^ C ^ ^ ^ I , R L ^ W E M , ^ ^ ^ W E M ^ ^ ^ ^ _ 540O^ . ' /� , I ^ R L. W EM —^ ' ~— , .` ^ ` — 5450^ ^ C ^ ^ ^ I ^ R l. W EM ^ ^ ^ ^ 5500. , Cl , ^ ^ I , R L W EM ^ ^ ^ ^ 55500 ^ C ^ ^ ^ I ^ R^l.W EM ^ ^ ^ ^ 56000 ^ C ^ + ^ I , R^ lJWEM 5644^OO 5650, ^ C C. I ^ R LW E ^ ^ ^ ^ 5700^ ^ C . , � ^ ! I ^ R LW E 57500 ^ G ^ ^ ^ I ^ R L WE 5762^00 58O0, ^ C I ^ R � WM� 58500 ^ C C. ^ ^ I ^ ^ RlJWME ^ ^ ^ ^ 5900, ^ C ^ ^ , I ^ , W E ^ ^ ^ ^ 595O^ ^ � C ^ ^ ^ I ^ ^ Wl.EM ^ ^ ^ ^ / . 6000, . C � ^ � ^ � ^ I ^ ^ W ElJ� 6012^OO 6050, ^ C ^ ^ ^ I ^ ^ W El. R ^ ^ ^ 6100, ^ C ^ , , I ^ ^ W E l.R ^ ^ ^ 6150^ ^ C ^ ^ ^ I ^ ^ W ]G lR ^ ^ ^ 6200^ ^ C ^ ^ , I ^ , W E }�W �625O^ ^ ^ ^ ^ I ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ . ' — ` 6300^ ^ C . ^ ^ I ^ ^ W E ^ M L 6350^ W ]G ^ M l. ^ ^ ^ 6400, , C , ^ ^ I ^ ^ W E ^ M l. � � 6450^ ^ C ^ ^ ^ I ^ ^ W E ^ MRL ^ ^ ^ ^ 1O O, C I ^ ^ W^ E �R M^ 50^ ^ C I ^ ^ W^ E lJR M^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ MOO 100^ ^ C I ^ ^ W^ E R 1500 ^ Cl `I ^ ^ W E lJ� 200, , C I ^ ^ W � �R M ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 250, ^ C I ^ ^ W ]G LR M 300, ^ C I . ^ W l.R M ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 350. ^ C I ^ ^W }G L M ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 400^ , C ^ I ^ ^W E L M ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 450^ ^ C ^ I ^ ^W E L M 500, ^ Cl . W E l. M 550^ ^ C ^ I 600, ^ C . I , , W �l. M . 650, ^ C ^ I C. ^ W EL M ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 700. ^ C ^ I ^ ^ W E 750^ ^ 'C ^ I ^ ^ W RElJ1 ^ ^ 800, , C ^ ` I ^ ^ W RELM , 85O^ ^ C ^ I^ ^ W R�lM ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 892^00 9OO, ^ C ^ ^ I , WR E ^ , ^ ^ ^ ^ 950^ ^ C ^ ^ I ^ WR E I. ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 1000. , Cl , , I ! WR Ell . , ^ , ^ ^ 1050^ ^ Cl ^ ^ I ^ W EM ^ ^ ^ 1100^ ^ C ^ ^ I , RW EM . ^ ^ , ^ , 1150^ ^ C ^ ^ I ^ RW LE ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 1200. ^ Cl ^ ^ I , RW LE 1250^ ^ C ^ ^ I ^ RW l.8 ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 13000 ^ I ^ R Wl.E ^ . ^ , ^ . ^ 140 6^ ^ C , ^ I ^ R WlE ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ` 45O 1 ^ ^ ^ I ^ R WM�^ ^ ^ ^ , ^ - — Cl� � � . 1500, ^ C ^ ^ I ^ R WME^ 1550^ ^ � C ^ ^ I C. R WME^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 16OO, , Cl ^ ^ I , )� WM}�^ 161200 1650^ ^� ' C ^ ^ I ^ R l.WEI^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 17000 ^ C ^ ^ I , R lJWME , ' ^ ^ ^ ^ ' 17500 C ^ ^ I � ^� R LWME ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ I ^ R LWME ^ C. ^ ^ ^ 18506 c E ^ 1900^ . Cl . ^ I ^ R LW E N� 1950^ ^ C ^ ^ I ^ R LW }S ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 2000^ , C , . I ^ R LW ,E 2050^ ^ C ^ ^ I ^ R 1. W^}3 ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ' 2100. ^ Cl ` ^ . , I . RL W^EM_ 2150 A 2200^ ^ C.I. , , I ^ R lJ�^}�M 2250^ ^� C + ^ I ^ Rl/W^E M 2300, ^ C , RlJJ, Ell 2350, ^ ' C ^ ^ I ^ R�W^ E M ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ -^ 24000 . C 2450^ ^ C ^ , I ^ L W E M ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 25OO, ^ C ^ , I ^ � W S M ' 2532^00 2550^ ^ C ^ ^ I ^ LRW E M ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 2600. ^ C ^ ^ I ^ lF-11W E M ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 265O, ^ [� ^ ^ I ^ � � W }� M 2700, ^ 'C , ^ I . � W E M � 2750^ I ^ L ^W ]G M ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 2800^ , C ^ , I . l. .W E M ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 2850^ ^ C ^ ^ I ^ l. ^W ]G M ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 2900. , C ^ ^ I , l. ^W E M 2950^ ^ C ^ ^ I ^ L ^W E M ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ .` 3OOO, ^ C.I. , . I ^ LR ^ W 3050^ ^ C ^ ^ I ^ l.R ^ W 1-3 M ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 310O� I. Cl ^ ^ I . ].R ^ W }� / ' ` 31500 1 Cl ^ ^ I ^ l. ^ W E M 9850 99OO^ ^ C ^ ^ ^ ^ 01 ^ `^ / , 9950^ ^ C 100000 , Cl ^ ' ^ ^ ' 10050 E M O. 1O1OO^ ^ C ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ I ^ ^ W� M l. 10156, WER M l. 10200. W �- RM l. 236^OO 102509 ^ Cl ^ ^ -- � ^ ' ^ ^ ^ &L-� R l. -��' 10300. , C , ^ ^ ^ ^ I ^ _ , WE RM - L - �- 1O35O^ ^ C' ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ , I ^ ^ W E Rill L ~--_ 10400. ^ ' C ^ ^ ^ . ^ I ^ , W E RM L 1045O^ I W ]� R M l. ^ C � ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 10500. ^ W ER M L 105500 ^ C ^ ^ � ^ ' ^ , I ^ ^ W ER M r l. 10600. ^ C ^ , , ^ ^ I ^ ^ W E^ M l. 10650^ ^ C ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ I ^ ^ WE^ M l. I WR}� 10700, M �/ , C . ^ ^ ^ �^ ^ ^ 10750^ ^ Cl . � ^ ^ ^ ^ I ^ ^ WR� ` , C ^ ^� � ^ ^ I ^ ^ WR}� 108000 , M l. 10850^ ^ W,}3 M L 10900, ^ C ^ ^ ^ ^ , I , ^ W^E M l. 10950^ ^ C ^ ^ ^ ' ^ I ^ ^ RW(.E M l.^ 11000. . C ^ � , .� ^ . . ^ I ^ . RW^ E 11050, � � C . ^ ^ ^ ^ � ^ I ^ ^ R W E 1J1 ^ ~ 11100, , ^ C ^ ,� ^ ^ � , I ^ . R W E l. M ^ 11156.00 1120O^ , C ^ � , ^ . ^ , I ^ ^ R W }� 04/22/87 110303 ' PACE 19 . RUN O4/22/87 11 x58:15 HEC2 RELEASE DATED NOV 76 UPDATED MAY 1984 ERROR CORR - O1 /O2/O3 ,O4/O5/O6 ' MODIFICATION - 50/51 /52/53/54/55/56 IBM-PC-XT VERSION . . ` NOTE- ASTERISM <j) AT lAF% O}� S}�C�ION'Ni�0�R INDICATES MESSACE IN SUMMARY OF ERRORS LIST ` ` CEDAR RIVER-100 YR FLOW ' ` SUMMARY PRINTOUT S�CNO X�CH ��OPW7D EG ELMIN CRIWS CWSEL SS�A S�CH� S�CHR ��)S� 1OD*S ' 0100 ^OO 155^ 14 . 15080 '2^8O ^OO 14^26 35^ 17 3O,4O 190090 190^31 30^47 * 62.000 6000 155094 15.98 2,80 ,00 14,64 34,43 30,40 190,90 19O^37 24.75 / 892^000 836^00 147^79 18^29 10^30 ,00 16,75 111085 107050 260^80 259^64 28^71 161290 ` 20^00 23504 19,67 11 ,00 ,00 18�79 252^85 261 ,4O 42O.6 . 594^76 12^65 ' �� � �� 2532^O0O 920^OO 141 ^4O 21 .22 12^40 +00 19^93 126O^5O 126O^5O 1401 ^90 1401 ,90 19059 � 33829000 850.00 130090 22,78 12^20 000 21 .51 1232,00 1232,00 1362^90 1362^90 17, 15 ` �� 6502^00 6550^ ^ C ^ ^ ^ I , ^ W E ^ MR L ^ ^ 6541 ,OO 66OO, W Ell MR L ^ , 6650^ ^ Cl ^ ^ , I ^ ^ W }".^ MlR ^ ^ ^ 6681 +00 6700, C ^ ^ ^ I ^ ^ ' W E 675O^ W }� l. R^ ^ ^ 68000 , C ^ ^ ^ I ^ , W E l.M R , ^ '850^ ^ C ^ ^ ^ I ^ ^ W }� ' 6900. W E l. R ^ ^ 6921 ^00 695 W E 6931 ^00 7000. W E ' 6973 7050^ ^ C ^ ^ ^ I ^ ^ W^E 6983,00 7100 W,E . L ^ ^ 71O3^0O 7150. '^ C ^ ^ ^ ^ I ^ R W^� l.M I. ^ ^ 7200^ ^ C ^ ^ + , I ^ RW,E l,M^ , , 725O^ ^ C ^ ^ ^ ^ I ^ W^E l~ M ^ ^ 730O, ^ ` � [� � ^ � � ^ ^ ^ I ^ W^ ER L ,M 7350, ^ C ^ ^ ^ ^ I ^ W^ E R l.^M 7400^ ^ C ^ ' ^ ^ , I , W^ E Rl ^ M ^ ^ 7450^ ^ ' Cl ^ ^ , ^ I ^ W^ }G 7483.1)O 750O^ ^ C ^ , . ^ I , W E L R ^ ^ 7550^ ^ Cl ^ ^ ^ ^ I � ^ W LE ^ R ^ ^ , 7600^ ^ C L. W E . R ^ ^ 76431.00 7650^ ^ C ^ ^ ^ ^ IL ^ W E ^ R ^ 7653 OO 7700^ ^ C ^ ^ ^ , I ^ W E ^ L , 7725^O0 7750^ ^ C ^ W E ^ 7735^00 7800. ^ C ^ ' ^ W E ^ L ^ 7845^00 7850^ ^ C ^ ^ ^ ^ I ^ ^ W 1-1 ^ R LM ^ ` 7900, ^ C ^ , ^ ^ I ^ ^ W E , R LM , 7950^ ^ C ^ ^ ^ ^ I ^ ^ W E ^ R lJ` ^ 8O0O. . C . . W ^ R �M , 8OO2^OO 8O50, ^ ' Cl ^ ^ , ^ I ^ ^ W ^ R �M ^ 8092+00 8100^ ^ C ^ ^ ^ ^ I ^ ^ Wl E , M ^ ' R ^ 8150, R} ^ 820O. ^ C ^ ^ ^ ' ^ I ^ . W }� ^ M ^ R ^ �= 8250^ ^ C ^ ^ ^ ^ I ^ ^ W E ^ M ^R C ^ W }� ^ M R , 8350, ^ Cl , ' . ^ ^ ^ I ^ � ^ ' k| I} R^ ' ^ 84004, Cl ^ � ^ I ' , ^ LW E . R , . / 8402^OO 8450 C ^ � ^ ^ ^ I ^ ^ LW ]G ' ^ R ^ ^ 8436,00 8500, ^ C, ^ ^ , ^ I ^ ^ lJJ E ^ R ^ ^ 8476^00 8550^ ^ Cl ^ ^ ^ I ^ ^ ^ W E ^ ^ R L. 8596^00 8600. C ^ ^ ^ ^ I ^ ^ R W E^ M ^ ^ 8650 ^ C ^ ^ ^ ^ I ^ ^ RW M. M l. ^ 8700, ' ^ C ^ ^ � ^ ^ I , ^ ^ M 11.1 ^ -6n ' 875O�' ^ (� - '� ^ ' ' ^' =� ' �. '� ^ '^ `��'` I ~ ^ � ^ � � w�^ �Y . 8800, ^ C , , ^ ' ^ I , ^ WE, M , l. . 890O, , C W E M ' 89501, ^ C ^ ^ ^ ^ I ^ ^ IT I. 90001 , Cl ^ ^ ^ I ^ . ^ Wl E M ^ l. ' 9O5O, ^ C ' ^ ^ ^ W^]G - M ^ l. 9100. ^ C , ^ ^ ^ I ^ ^ W,E M � 91 5O^ ^ C ^ ^ ^ ^ I ^ ^ I'll L. 9200^ . C , . 1:'t"1}3, M , l. . 9250^ , C ^ ^ , ^ I ^ ^ 1-1W E M W E M , l. ' 935O^ ^ C ^ ^ ^ ^ .1. w E M^ l. 9400. ^ C . ^ ^ . ^ I W � M^ ' L. 446^OO 945O, ^ - - --C_ - -~ .- ^ -- -_ �_ ~_ ~_ ^ ~- ~- ~I ^ - - �_^ }� `�- 95OO C I - '� ^ ^ ^ � ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ o Al '^ 9550 Irl ^ ` 96OO, ^ C ^ ^ ^ . ^ � I , , W E ^ 9650^ ^ C ^M ^ � 9700. ^ .�� � 5O _ _ - _ W' � M97 _ 3 ^ -IT �B�' 10236^000 5OO^OO 135,47 38.5O 27.4O ,OO 37.66 38^73 2O.00 178.20 174,20 28,76 ~-ft—mo~m—w 11156^000 920^00 14039 41 ^26 2700 ^OO 4O^ 18 10^94 10^00 10070 153^33 29^72 04/22/87 11 :53:13 PACE 21 CEDAR RIVER-100 YR FLOW SUMMARY PRINTOUT S�CNO D*XNl. D*XNCH D*XNR REA VCH CL S,1,ENCR 1100 35^00 25^00 35,00 853O^OO ,OO 8530^00 ^00 858^41 9^94 No ^00 * 62^000 No 25.04) ^OO 8530^00 ^OO 8530.00 ^OO 916^41 9^31 ^00 ^OO 890000 35 ^00 25^00 35,00 8530^00 ^OO 853000 ^OO 855^82 9^97 ^OO NO 1610000 45^00 25.00 45^00 8530.00 .64 8436.49 92^86 1178,99 7,60 ,OO ^00 2532^000 45^OO 25^0O 45^OO 8530^OO ^0O 8500^00 No 935. 19 9^ 12 ^OO ^OO � 3382^000 45,00 25.00 45^00 8530^OO ^OO 8530,00 ,OO 94106 9,06 ,00 ,00 3902^000 45^00 25^00 45^00 8530^00 ^OO 8530^00 ^OO 1133^84 702 ^OO ^00 3964,000 .00 25,00 , OO 8530.00 ^OO 8530^00 ,OO 1464.27 5.83 ^OO ,00 4114^000 45^00 25^00 45^OO 8530^00 ^OO 8530.00 No 1241 ^92 607 ^00 .00 4654^O00 45^00 25^0O 45.00 8530000 .00 8530^00 ,OO 1117 ^51 7^63 .00 ,0O 5244^000 45^00 25^00 45^00 8530^00 ^OO 8530^00 ^OO 1034^ 12 8^25 ^OO ^OO 5644,000 45^0O 25.00 45,00 8530^00 ,00 8530^00 ,00 1089,35 7^83 ^OO ^OO 5762^O00 ^OO 25^00 ^OO 8530000 ^OO 8530^00 ^OO 1190^26 7^ 17 ^OO ^OO 6012,000 45^0O 25,00 45. 00 8530,00 ^00 8530^00 ^OO 974.34 8.75 ^OO ^OO 6502^000 45^00 25^00 45,O0 8530^00 ^OO 8530^00 ^OO 94108 9^06 ^OO ^OO 6541 ^000 000 25^00 ^OO 853O.00 .00 8530,00 ^00 994,32 8^58 ^OO ^OO 6681 ^000 45^00 25 ^O0 45 ^OO 8530^00 ^OO 8530,00 ^OO 942^48 9^05 ^00 ^OO 6921 ^000 4500 25.00 45,00 8530^00 ,OO 853O.00 ^00 1067,73 7,99 ,00 .00 6931 ,000 45^00 3O^OO 45^00 8530,00 No 8530^00 ,OO 1053^38 8^ 10 ,OO ^OO 6973000 45^00 30^OO 45,00 8530^00 ^OO 853000 ^OO 1065^67 8^00 No ^OO 6983^000 45,00 25^00 45,00 8530,00 ^OO 8530^00 ^OO 1090^72 7 ^82 ^OO ^OO 7103^O00 45^00 25.00 45^OO 8530^00 ^OO 852O^45 9.55 989,83 8.67 ,OO .00 7483^000 45 ^00 20^00 45^OO 8530000 ^OO 8530^00 ^OO 929,47 9^ 18 ^OO ^00 7643^000 45^00 28,00 45^00 8530,00 ,00 8530^OO ,OO 821 ^28 10.39 ^OO ^OO 1 3964^000 62^00 168,77 25^29 14,00 .00 24,76 1318^ 11 1318^00 1487.00 1486^88 5,67 All 4^O0O 15O^OO 135^2O 25^55 14^5O ^OO 24^82 1432^ 1O 1432^ 1O 1567^3O 1567^3O 7, 19 4654^000 54O^OO 132,3O 26,O6 15.6O .00 25, 15 1492.3O 1492,30 1624^6O 1624.6O 9,93 5244^OOO 59O^OO 132^6O 26^77 16^4O ^OO 25^71 248,3O 248^3O 38O^9O 38O^9O 12^84 5644,000 400,00 152^00 27^31 17^50 ,OO 26,36 340O0 34,0O 186,00 186^00 12,85 5762^0OO 118^0O 152^OO 27,82 17^5O C. 27^O2 34^OO 34^OO 186^OO 186^OO 9^57 6012,000 250^00 134,28 28,32 18^ 10 ' ,OO 27^ 13 27.98 26,00 167.00 162,26 16.41 6502^O0O 490^00 132^86 29^21 19^ 10 ^OO 27^93 39^64 34^8O 177^9O 172^51 17^89 6541 ,000 39,00 133^86 29.47 19^ 10 ^OO 28,33 38.65 34.8O 177^9O 172^51 15^ 13 6681 ^000 140^00' 126,49 29^76 ` 19,40 ^00 28^49 11 ^81 9^5O 148^30 138^30 17^33 1 O4/22/87 11x5313 PAC� 20 SEC NO X�CH TOPWID EC El�IN CRIWS CWS�� SS�A S�CH� S�CHR GNDS� 6921 ^000 240,00 124^00 3O. 18 19^50 ^OO 29, 19 10^01 10^00 134,01 134,00 11 ^51 6931 ^00O 1O OO, 121 ^OO 3O^22 19^5O ^OO 29^2O 1O^O1 1O^OO 134^01 134,OO 18^56 N� 6973,O0O 42^OO 121 ^00 3O,30 ' 19,5O ^OO 29^31 1O^01 10^00 134,O1 134^OO 17^92 6983 OOO 1O^0O 124^OO 3O^33 19^5O ^OO 29^38 1O^O1 1O^OO 134^O1 134^OO 1O,76 ^ 71O3^0O0 12O.00 139^55 3O^57 20.60 ^OO 29^41 25^35 16.3O 16O^91 164^9O 16. 11 7483^00O 38O^OO 127^61 31 , 15 21 ^3O ^OO 29,84 27^39 22^5O 165^OO 155^OO 11 ^71 7643^OOO 16O,OO 113.O5 31 ,61 21 ,7O ,OO 29^93 5O,OO 5O,00 179,OO 163,05 28. 13 7653^OOO 1O,OO 1 05^57 31 ^72 21 ^70 ,OO 29^95 5O^O1 5O^OO 179^OO 163^O8 51 ^O2 7725,000 72^00 106.38 3 ^02 21 ^70 .00 30^46 50,01 5O^OO 179,O0 163^89 21 ,47 7735^OOO 1O^OO 114^34 32^ 10 21 ^7O ^OO 3O^75 5O^O1 5O^OO 179^OO 164^34 17,51 7845^000 11O^00 135^70 32,35 21 ,40 ^00 31 ^26 14, 16 3,610 167,9O 149^87 14,3O 8002^000 157^00 136^24 32^5O 21 ^40 ^OO 31 ,46 14^08 3^6O 167^90 15O^33 13^21 8092^000 90,00 123.O6 32.88 22,20 000 31 ,56 125.43 125^20 274,00 248,49 25,24 84102^000 3101-00 120^7O 33^49 21 ^60 ^OO 32^3O 27^70 27^70 156^90 148^4O 13,89 8436^O0O 34.00 12O^99 33,64 21 .6O ,OO 32,52 27,7O 27^7O 156^9O 148,69 12,76 8476^000 40^00 1O2^03 3 ^OO 19,5O ^OO 32^53 27,O6 6^ 10 149^ 10 129^09 16^39 `8596,O0O 12O^OO 152,37 34,29 21 ^8O ^OO 33,59 7O,35 69, 1O 23O,3O 234,73 19^62 8836^OOO 24O^OO 158^77 34^76 22^8O ^OO 34^O2 3O^35 9^5O 189^4O 189^ 12 18^55 ����� 61O,00 135.32 36.38 24^6O ^OO 23.57 8^4O 136.8O 158,89 35,25 - - - - ' - _ SECNO D*XNL D*XNCH D*XNR Q ('..'LOB QCH QROB AREA VCH STENCL S,f ENCR ` 7653000 45^00 35000 WOO 8530.00 .00 8530^00 ,OO 797,56 10,70 .00 000 7725000 45.00 25000 45^00 8530^00 ^OO 8530^00 ^00 851098 10^01 ^OO .00 , 7735000 45.00 25.00 45,O0 8530000 ,OO 8530.00 ,OO 91047 9,33 ,OO 000 78459000 45^00 25^00 45^OO 8530000 ^OO 8530000 ,OO 1016^67 8039 ^OO ,OO 8002,000 ^OO 25.00 .00 8530.00 ,OO 853O,0O .00 1043^'44 8, 17 ,OO 8092^000 451.00 3O^00 45^00 853O1.00 .00 8530^00 ^OO 926^62 9^21 ^OO ^OO 84021.000 45.00 25.00 45.00 8530^00 ^OO 853O,OO ,OO 976,39 8,74 ,OO ,OO 8436^000 ^OO 25^00 ^00 85301.00 ^OO 8530^00 ^OO 1002^84 8,51 ^OO ^OO . 8476000' 45400 25400 45,0O 853O^0O 400 8530.00 ,0O 87�9,30 9.7O ,OO ^00 . ' 8596^000 50^00 35^00 40^O0 8530^00 ^OO 8527^39 2^61 1279^24 6,68 ^OO ^00 ' 8836^000 50^00 35^00 40,00 853000 .00 8530000 .00 1234.39 6,91 ,OO ,OO 9446^000 50^00 44.00 50000 8530^OO ^OO 8519^50 10^49 1026^93 8638 ^OO ^O0 ' 9736^000 50.00 44,00 50.00 8530,00 73^80 7985^92 47008 1341 ,66 7^O5 000 ,OO 10230000 50000 44^00 50^00 8530,00 ^OO 8530000 WO 115902 706 ' .00 000 _ 111569000 50^OO 44.O0 5O^OO 853O^OO ,OO 8467^74 62^26 1O53.74 8,35 .00 .00 ` 1 04/22/87 1053:13 PACE 23 � SUMMARY OF ERRORS AND SPECIAL NOTES CAU�ION S 60000 PROFIl.E= 1 HYDRAULIC JUMP D,S. ' ` 1 - ` /22/87 11 :5806 � PACE 1 ` ^ . ' THIS RUN 13XECUTED 04/22/87 1108:37 ************************************************** HEC2 RELEASE DATED NOV 76 UPDATED MAY 1984 . ` ERROR CORR - 01 /02/03/04/05/06 MODIFICATION - 50/51/52/53/54/55/56 IBM-PC-XT VERSION ) ` ' ^� 8830000 50^00 35^00 40,0O 8530,00 ^OO 853000 ^OO 123409 6^91 ,00 000 9446000 50000 4400 50000 8530^00 ^O0 8519050 1049 1026^93 8^38 ^OO ^OO 9736^000 50000 44,OO 50000 8530000 79^ 13 6039^O4 2411 ,83 2253^74 5.09 ^OO ,OO 10236*000 50^00 44900 50000 8530^00 ^OO 853000 ^OO 116103 704 ^OO .00 11150000 50000 44.00 50000 8530,00 ,OO 8467^35 62.65 1054,29 8035 ,OO ^00 1 04/22/87 11x41 :36 PACE 23 SUMMARY OF ERRORS AND SPECIAL NOTES CAUTION SECNO= 60000 PRO}:ILE= 1 HYDRAULIC JUMP W.S. 1 04/22/87 11 :47:12 PACE 1 THIS RUN EXECUTED 04/22/87 11 :47x13 ************************************************** HEC2 RELEASE DATED NOV 76 UPDATED MAY 1984 ' ERROR CORR - 01 /02/03/04/05/06 MODIFICATION - 50/51 /52/53/54/55/56 IBM-PC-XT VERSION N� ' ' . ` OO^ OO^ 0/^6 OC^6Z8 OO^ 0000Cs8 OO^ 00006s8 0O^sv 000M 0O*sv 00009M8 ' OW OO^ T��^8 �8^30OT OO^ 0O^OC��R O0^ 0O^OC�8 OO^ O0^��3 OO^ OOO^9C�8~- ' � OO^ OO^ ty Z^8 6 Ell^9 000 00^OCs8 0O^ 00^0C98 0O^SV 00053 ' 00^sv 000^30v8 OO^ OO^ T306 390936 OO^ 0040CS9 OO^ 0O^OC�R OOW 0040C OO^W 00043600 00^ OO^ �T ^8 '�^Cif�OT OO^ 0O^OCG8 000 000OCsi OO^ OO^S.13 OO^ 00O^3O0\.j OO^ OO^ 6C^8 Z9119TO1: OO^ 0O^OC R OO^ OO^O Ell li.; OO^S3 0O^sp OOO^SPRZ OO^ CC^� '!V^t'16 OO^ 00006s8 000 0000CS8 OO+Gt' OO^S3 OO^W OOO^SCZZ OO^ OO^ TO^OT 86, TS8 OO^ OO^OMR 0O^ OO^OCsR 0O^W 000G3 OO^sh 0004S3Z'! . 000 OO^ 0V01 9S^/!6Z OO^ 0O^OCS8 OO^ 009OCS8 00^sv OO^SC OO'sv 0OO^Cs9z 831613JS . �3N3�S H3A V38V 8O8O H3O 8D10 O 8NX*D H3NX*D �NX*D ON33S � - - -- - - - ' - � 33 3oVJ � � 9C: THTT Z8/33M) . T O0^ 000 6660T 83^ T38 006 00606s8 000 00^OCG8 OO^W 00983 000sp 0004Ct'9Z OO^ 009 9106 /!V^636 OO^ 0040CS8 OO^ OO^OCGR OO^SP OO^O3 Most 000^C8M ' 000 006 Z908 C80686 SS06 WO3S8 0O^ 00^OCs8 � 0O^ ' 0O^�3 WOW �� . OO^ OO^ 3Z40601 OO^ OO^OCSR OO^ OO^OCS | OO^Stv 00^S3 0O^Sty .000^C869 OO^ 00^ OO^8 Z911S90T OO^ 0O^OCsii8 OO^ 0000Cs8 0005V 00^06 OO^SV 0OO^CZ OO^ OO^ 0108 8C^CS01 OO^ OO^OCSR 000 0060CS8 OO^W OO^OC OO^sv 0OO^ TC69 0O^ 0O^ 66V CZ^Z90T 000 OO^OCS8 OO^ OO^OCS8 OO^W OO^s3 00^GP 0000T369 OO^ OO^ SO^6 8V^3P6 060 OO^OCS8 OO^ OO^OCS8 Most OO^s3 0O^so 6000TV99 . OO^ 000 M^8 3C^V66 OO^ 000OCs8 000 00^06s8 OO^ OO^S3 000 0004TVS9 OO^ 0O^ 90^6 RSM6 OO^ 0O^OCSR - OO^ OO^OCgR 0O^Sty OO^S3 Most 00043OS9 ' 00^ 00+ U^8 JCW6 -OO^ OO^OCS8 OO^ OO^OCS8 OO^W 00^5-13 000Si7 000113T09 ' OO^ OO^ ZT ^Z 93^06TT OO^ 0O^OC�R OO^ OO^OC�8 0O^ OO^�3 0O� OOO^39�� � OO^ OO^ C8^Z SC068OT OO^ OO^OCG8 OO^ 00006s8 0O^so 001SE OO^W 0000PP95i; ` OO^ 000 G3^8 3T ^PCOT OO^ OO+OCSR OO^ OO^OCSR 004sp 06 0S3 OO^�;t/ OOO 3s ' 000 000 69^z TSMTT OO^ 0060CS9 OO^ 0000CS8 0O^W OO^S3 OO^Sty 0O0^vs9i/ �� . �� \ OO^ 000 Z809 36W3T OO^ OO^OCSR 000 OO^OCSR OO^sty OO^S3 OO^W OOO^PTTV 000 OO^ C8^S Z3^V9VT OO^ OO^OCS8 OO^ OO^OCS8 0O^ OO^s3 000 00040966 OO^ OO^ 3S^Z V80CCTT OO^ OO^OCS8 000 MOM OO^st 006S3 00^Gt' 000'3O6C 00^ 000 9006 9MV6 OO^ 0040CS8 000 0O^OCS8 00^W OO^S3 OO^GV 0OO^EWE, ' � 00^ O0^ 3T66 MGMO0^ OO^OCSR OO^ OO^OC��R 0O^�� 7 OO^�3 000sp 00043CS3 S}�CNO X�CH TOPWID �C ��MIN CRJWS CWS�� SS�A S1�CH� S�CHR ENDST 1OD*S 6921 ^000 240.00 124^00 30^ 18 19^50 ^00 2909 10^01 10,00 134,01 134^00 11 .51 6931 ^OOO 10^00 121 ^OO 30,22 19^50 ^OO 29^20 1O^O1 10^00 134^01 134^OO 18^56 6973^OOO 4000 121 ^00 30. 30 19^50 ^OO 29^31 10^01 1O^OO 134^01 13000 17^92 6983^OOO 10^0O 124^00 30^33 1900 NO 29^38 10^01 10^OO 134^01 134^OO 10^76 7103^OOO 120^00 139,55 3O.57 20^60 .00 29.41 25^35 16.3O 160,91 164^90 16^ 11 7483000 380^00 127,61 31 ^ 15 21 ^3O ^00 29^84 27^39 22^50 165^00 155^00 11 ^71 7643^000 160,00 113.05 31 ^61 21 ,70 ,OO 29,93 5O^OO 50^00 179^00 163^05 28. 13 7653^000 10^00 105^57 31 ^72 21 ^70 ,OO 29^95 5O^O1 50^00 179^OO 163^O8 51 ^O2 7725^000 72^00 106.38 32^02 21 ,70 ,OO 30^46 50^01 50^00 179^00 163^89 21 ^47 7735^000 10^00 114^34 32^ 10 21 ^70 ^00 30^75 50^O1 50^00 179^0O 16404 17^51 7845^OOO 110,00 135.70 32^35 21 ,40 ^OO 31 ^26 14^ 16 3,60 167,90 149^87 14^30 8002000 157^00 136^24 32^5O 21 ^40 ^0O 31 ^46 14^08 3,60 167^9O 15O^33 13^21 8092^000 9000 123^O6 32^88 22,20 ^OO 31 ,56 125,43 125^2O 274,00 248^49 25^24 8402^000 310,00 120^70 33^49 21 ^60 NO 32^3O 27,70 27^70 15600 148^40 13^89 8436^000 34^00 120^99 33,64 21 ^6O NO 3202 27^70 27.70 156.90 148^69 12^76 8476^000 40^00 102^03 34^OO 19,50 ^OO 32^53 27^06 600 14900 129^09 16 ^39 8596 ,000 12O^OO 152^37 34.29 21 ^80 ^ 00 33^59 70^35 69, 10 230.30 234^73 19.62 8836^000 240^00 158^77 3406 22^80 ^01.) 34^O2 30^35 9^50 189^40 189^ 12 18^55 15eC- x| ` 9446^000, 610^00 135^32 36^38 24,60 ^00 35.30 23^57 8.40 136.80 158^89 35^25 9736^OOO 29O^OO 419^01 37^23 24^70 ^OO 36.92 46^41 87^00 204^00 545^00 10^79 SEW �5 1O236^OOO 500^00 135,52 38,51 27,4O ^OO 6 38,71 20^00 178^2O 174.23 28^59 s���� 11156^000 920^00 142^43 41 ^26 2700 NO 40^ 19 10^93 10^00 108^70 153^36 29 ^68 1 04/22/87 11x41x36 PACE 21 CEDAR RIVER-100 YR FLOW SUMMARY PRINTOU? S}�CNO D*XNL D*XNCH D*XNR Q QIOB QCH QROB NCR ^ 100 WOO 25^O0 35^00 8530^00 ^OO 853O^OO ^OO 858^41 9^94 ^OO ^OO * 62^000 NO 25^00 ,00 8530,00 .00 8530^00 ^OO 916^41 031 ^OO ,00 892 ^000 35^O0 25^0O 35^OO 8530^OO ^OO 8530^00 ^OO 855^82 9^97 NO ,OO 110000 ^ ^ RW^ }� ^ - I R W � �M 11O5O^ ^ C ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 11100^ ^ C ^ ^ . ^ . I , l. M ^ 111500 ^ ^ ^ I � ^ ^ R W El M ^ � 11156,OO 11200^ ^ C ^ � . � . , I ^ . R W E M ^ / 1 04/22/87 11x41 :36 PACE 19 / . ` � _ �HIS RUN EXECUTED 04/22/87 11 :46:52 ************************************************** HEC2 RELEASE DATED NOV 76 UPDATED MAY 1984 ERROR CORR - 01 /02/03/04/05/06 MODIFICATION - 50/51 /52/53/54/55/56 IBM-PC-XT VERSION � ^ NOTE- ASTERISK (*) AT LEFT OF CROSS-SECTION NUMBER INDICATES MESSAGE IN SUMMARY OF ERRORS LIST ' / C�DAR RIVUR-100 YR FLOW ` SUMMARY PRINTOUT . SECNO XIACH �OPWID EC ELMIN CRIWS CWSEL SS�A STCHl. STCHR ENDST 1OD*S ^ 1OO ^OO . 155^ 14 1'5,8O 2^8O ^OO 14,26 � 35^ 17 3O,4O 190090 190^31 30^47 * 62^000 62.00 155.94 15098 2.80 .00 14,64 34,43 3O^40 190,90 190037 24^75 . . 892^000 830000 147^79 18929 10030 ^00 16^75 111 ^85 107050 26O^80 259^64 28^71 1612^000 720.00 235964 19^67 11000 .00 - 18079 252^85 261 .40 420,6O 594476 12,65 2532^OOO 920^00 141 ^40 21 .22 12.40 ^00 19,93 1260^50 1260^50 140100 1401 ,90 19^59 3382^000 850.00 13090 22^78 1020 000 2101 1232+00 1232000 1362,90 1362,90 17. 15 . 39029000 52000 166^81 2307 14^00 ^00 22^79 1319003 1318100 1487^00 1485^84 12^87 ' 3964000 62.00 168^77 25.29 14^00 ,00 2406 1318^ 11 1318,00 148700 1486^88 5.67 4114000 150000 135^20 25^55 14^50 ^00 2402 1432^ 1O 1432^ 10 156700 1567130 7, 19 4654^OOO 540,00 132,30 26,O6 15.60 ,00 25. 15 1492,30 1492^30 162400 1624.60 9.93 5244000 590^00 13200 26^77 1040 ,00 25^71 24800 248,30 380^90 380^90 12+84 5644,000 400,OO 152600 27,31 17050 ^OO 26,36 34^00 3000 18000 18000 -12,85 5762000 118600 152,00 27^82 1700 ^OO 2702 34^00 34^00 186^00 18000 ' 9^57 6012,000 25O.00 13408 ` 28,32 18010 000 27. 13 27,98 26400 16700 162,26 16,41 65026000 49000 132^86 29^21 19010 600 27093 39^64 34^80 177090 17201 17^89 6541 ,OOO 39^00 133,86 29,47 19, 10 ,00 2803 38,65 34,8O 177,9O 172,51 15013 6681 ^O0O 140^00 126^49 2906 19^40 ^00 28^49 11081 9,50 148^30 138^30 17,33 1 ` ^ ^ ^ 3 ^ ^O060T � W 3^M ^ ^ I ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 3 ^ ^0S80T 3 ^ 40080T 7 W 38M ^ ^ I ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 3 ^ ^Ogz0T 7 W 38M ^ ^ I ^ ^ ^ ^ 3 ^ ^MOT 7 W ^3M ^ ^ I ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 3 ^ 4OS90T � W ^3 M ^ ^ I ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 3 ^ ^0O9OT � W 83 M ^ ^ I ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 3 ^ ^OSSOT � W 83 M ^ ^ I ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 3 ^ ^0OGOT I ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 3 ^ ^O90OT M ^ ^ I ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 3 ^ ^MOT 3 ^ ^OSCOT I ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 3 ^ ^O000T ^ A� 8 3 M ^ ^ I ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ — 3 ^ 0S30T O0^9C3OT -Las � W8 3 M ^ ^ I ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 3 ^ 000301: � W 3 M ^ ^ I ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 3 ^ ^0sTOT � W 3M ^ ^ I ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 3 ^ ^0OTOT � W 3M8 ^ ^ I ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 3 ^ ^OGO0T ^7 W 3M 8 ^ ^ I ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 3 ^ ^0000T ^ � W 3M 8^ ^ I ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 3 ^ ^OS66 ^ I 3M 08 ^ I ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 3 ^ ^O066 ^ W I3M ^ 8 ^ I ^ ^ ^ ^ 3 ^ ^OS86 ^ W 3M 1 ^ 8 ^ I ^ ^ ^ ^ 3 ^ ^O086 ^ W if ^ 1 8 ^ ^ I ^ ^ ^ ^ 3 ^ 409M 0049CZ6 QHQQV ^ W 3MI ^ 8 ^ ^ I ^ ^ ^ ^ 3 ^ ^0OZ6 ^ W 7 3M ^ 8 ^ ^ I ^ ^ ^ ^ 3 ^ ^OS96 ^ � W 3 M ^ 8 ^ ^ I ^ ^ ^ ^ 3 ^ ^OO96 ^7 W 3M ^ 8 ^ ^ I ^ ^ ^ ^ 3 ^ 0OGS6 � W 3 M^ 8 ^ ^ I ^ ^ ^ ^ 3 ^ 000S6 7 W 3 M^8 ^ ^ I ^ ^ ^ ^ 3 ^ 4OSV6 00^ 9VV6 ^OOV6 ^ ^ ^ 3 ^ 40SC6 ^ 00OC6 ^ ^ I ^ ^ ^ ^ 3 ^ ^OS36 � ^ W 3M8 ^ ^ I ^ ^ ^ ^ 3 ^ 00036 � ^ W 3^M ^ ^ I ^ ^ ^ ^ 3 ^ ^OST6 � ^ W 30M ^ ^ I ^ ^ ^ ^ 3 ^ 00OT6 'l ^ W 3^M ^ ^ I ^ ^ ^ ^ 3 ^ 00S06 � ^ W 3M ^ ^ I ^ ^ ^ ^ 3 ^ ^O006 � ^ W 38M ^ ^ I ^ ^ ^ ^ 3 ^ ^0960' � ^ W 3 M ^ ^ I ^ ^ ^ ^ 3 ^ ^0068 � ^ W 3 M ^ ^ I ^ ^ ^ ^ 3 ^ 0Os8R 0049C88 � ^ W ^3M ^ ^ I ^ ^ ^ ^ 3 ^ 40088 ^ 7 ^ W ^3M ^ ^ I ^ ^ ^ ^ 3 ^ ^OSM ^ I W 03M8 ^ ^ I ^ ^ ^ ^ 3 ^ 00008 ^ ^ 7 W ^ 3 M8 ^ ^ I ^ ^ ^ ^ 3 ^ 0OS9R ^ ^ W ^3 M H ^ ^ I ^ ^ ^ ^ 3 ^ 60098 00496S8 1 8 ^ ^ 3 M ^ ^ ^ I ^ ^ ^ 3 ^ WSW 0049zv8 ^ ^ 8 ^ 3 Ml ^ ^ I ^ ^ ^ ^ 3 ^ 4OOG8 0009CV8 ^ ^ 8 ^ 3 M� ^ ^ I ^ ^ ^ ^ 3 ^ 10GV8 0043Op8 ^ ^ 8 ^ 3 Mll ^ ^ I ^ ^ ^ ^ 3 ^ 000v8 ^ ^8 W ^ 3 M ^ ^ I ^ ^ ^ ^ 3 ^ ^OSC8 ^ Al W ^ 3 M ^ ^ I ^ ^ ^ ^ 3 ^ 00068 ^ 8^ W ^ If M ^ ^ I ^ ^ ^ ^ 3 ^ 4OS3R ^ 8 ^ W ^ 3 M ^ ^ I ^ ^ ^ ^ 3 ^ 40038 ^ 8 ^ W ^ 3 7M ^ ^ I ^ ^ ^ ^ 3 ^ ^OGTR ^ 8 ^ W ^ 3 7M ^ ^ I ^ ^ ^ ^ 3 ^ ^O0T8 0003608 ^ Wl 8 ^ 3 M ^ ^ I ^ ^ ^ ^ 3 ^ 40SO8 0043OO8 , Wl 8 ^ 3 M ^ ^ I ^ ^ ^ ^ 3 ^ ^O0O8 ^ W� 8 ^ 3 M ^ ^ I ^ ^ ^ ^ 3 ^ 4096Z. ^ Wl 8 ^ 3 M ^ ^ I ^ ^ ^ ^ 3 ^ 4006Z. ^ Wl 8 ^ 3 M ^ ^ I ^ ^ ^ ^ 3 ^ 1098z 004Sv8Z ^ � ^ 3 M ^ ^ I ^ - ^ ^ 3 ^ ^O08Z 00^SC�� ^ 7 ^ 3 M^ ^ I ^ ^ ^ ^ 3 ^ ^Oszz 004S3Zle.l. oo4rc9/ 4400^ . C ^ ^ I L R W M ^ ^ ^ ^ 4450^ ^ C ^ ^ I l, R W E M ^ ^ ^ ^ 4500. ^ C ^ , I ^L R W E M ^ ^ ^ ^ 4550^ ^ C ^ ^ ^ I ^ � R W E M ^ ^ ^ ^ 4600^ ^ C ^ ^ ^ I ^ l. R W E M 4650^ ^ C ^ ^ ^ I ^ LR W E M ^ ^ ^ ^ 4654^00 4700^ ^ C ^ ^ , I ^ LR W C.� M 4750^ ^ C ^ ^ ^ I ^ L W � M 4800. ^ C ^ ^ ^ I ^ L ^W� M ^ ^ ^ ^ 4850^ ^ C ^ ^ ^ I ^ L M ^ ^ ^ ^ 4900^ ^ C ^ ^ ^ I ^ Fill ^W is M ^ ^ ^ ^ 4950^ ^ C ^ ^ ^ I ^ RL ^W 13 M ^ ^ ^ ^ 5000, ^ C ^ ^ ^ I W E M ^ ^ ^ ^ 5050. ^ C , ^ ^ I ^ R L ^W E M ^ ^ ^ ^ 510O^ ^ C , ^ ^ I ^ R � ^W E M 5150^ ^ C ^ ^ ^ I ^ Rlf, ^W E M ^ ^ ^ ^ 5200^ ^ C ^ ^ ^ I ^ R L ^W is M ^ ^ ^ ^ 5244^00 5250^ ^ C ^ ^ ^ I ^ R L ^W T." M ^ ^ ^ ^ 5300^ , C ^ , ^ I ^ R L ^ W M 5350^ ^ C ^ ^ ^ I ^ R 11 ^ W 13 M ^ ^ ^ ^ 5400, ^ C ^ ^ , I ^ R 'L^ W EM ^ ^ ^ ^ 5450^ , C 5500, ^ C ^ , , I ^ R L W }�M ^ ^ ^ ^ 5550, ^ C ^ ^ ^ I ^ R ^.( W EM ^ ^ ^ ^ 5600^ ^ C ^ ^ ^ I ^ R^ LWEM ^ ^ ^ ^ 5644 ^00 5650, ^ C ^ ^ ^ I ^ R l.W 5700^ ^ C ^ ^ ^ I ^ R LW 5750^ ^ C ^ ^ ^ I ^ R 1. 1411 ^ ^ ^ ^ N� 5762^00 5800^ ^ C ^ ^ ^ I ^ R L WE 5850^ ^ C ^ ^ , I ^ ^ RIWME ^ ^ ^ ^ 5900, ^ C , ^ ^ I ^ ^ W E 5950^ ^ C , ^ ^ I ^ ^ WLEM 6000, ^ C ^ ^ ^ I ^ ^ W Usk ^ ^ ^ ^ 6012^00 6050^ , C ^ ^ ^ I ^ ^ W L R ^ ^ ^ 6100, ^ C ^ ^ ^ I ^ ^ W }� LR ^ ^ ^ 6150^ ^ C ^ ^ ^ I ^ ^ W E lR ^ ^ ^ 6200, ^ C ^ ^ ^ I ^ ^ W E 6250, ^ C ^ ^ ^ I ^ ^ W � 6300. ^ C ^ ^ ^ I ^ ^ W M � 6350, ^ C ^ ^ ^ I ^ ^ W E ^ M � ^ ^ ^ 6400^ ^ C ^ ^ ^ I ^ ^ W � ^ M � ^ ^ ^ 6450^ ^ C ^ ^ ^ I ^ ^ W E ^ MR� ^ ^ ^ 6500^ ^ C ^ ^ ^ I ^ ^ W E ^ MR L. ^ ^ 6502 ^00 6550^ ^ C ^ ^ ^ I ^ ^ W 6541 ^00 6600^ ^ C ^ ^ ^ I ^ ^ W 6650, ^ C ^ ^ , I ^ ^ W �^ Ml.R ^ ^ ^ 6681 ,O0 6700^ ^ C , ^ ^ I ^ ^ W 1-.� LM 6750, ^ C ^ ^ ^ U. ^ W E L R^ ^ ^ 6800, ^ C ^ ^ , I ^ ^ W E LM R ^ ^ 6850^ ^ C ^ ^ ^ I ^ ^ W � LM^R ^ ^ 6900. ^ C ^ ^ ^ I ^ ^ W E L 6921 ^00 6950^ ^ C ^ ^ ^ I ^ ^ W ^ � ^ ^ 6931 ^00 7000^ ^ C ^ ^ ^ I ^ ^ W E ^ L ^ ^ 6973^00 7050^ ^ C ^ ^ ^ I ^ ^ W L ^ ^ 6983^00 7100^ ^ C ^ ^ ^ I ^ ^ W^Ell 7103^00 7150^ ^ C ^ ^ ^ ^ I ^ R W^� LM ^ ^ ^ 7200^ ^ C ^ ^ ^ ^ I ^ RW^E LM^ ^ ^ 7250^ ^ C ^ ^ ^ ^ I ^ W^}3 L M ^ ^ 7300^ ^ C ^ ^ ^ ^ I ^ W. ER 1, ^M ^ ^ 7350^ ^ C ^ ^ ^ ^ I ^ W^ E R L^M ^ ^ 7400, ^ C ^ ^ , ^ I ^ W^ l.." R�^ M ^ ^ 7450^ ^ C ^ ^ ^ ^ I ^ W^ 13 M M ^ ^ 7483^00 7500, ^ C ^ ^ ^ ^ I ^ W E L R ^ ^ 7550^ ^ C ^ ^ ^ , I ^ W LE ^ R ^ ^ 7600, ^ C ^ ^ ^ ^ I ^ � W R ^ ^ 1100. ^ C ^ ^ I , RW EM ^ ` 11500 ^ C ^ ^ I ^ RW LE ^ 1200, ^ C , ^ I ^ RW LE 1250^ ^ C ^ ^ I ^ RW �l� ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ � � 1300, , C ^ ^ I ' 1150^ ^ C ^ ^ I ^ R WlJG ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 1400. ^ C ^ ^ I , ` R WlJE ^ , ^ C. 1450^ , C ^ ^ I ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 1500^ , C ^ ^ I ^ R WME, ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 1550^ ^ C ^ ^ I ^ R WME^ C. ^ ^ C. ^ 1600^ ^ C I , R WME, ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 161200 1650^ ^ C , ^ I ' ^ R L I'll E^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 17000 ^ C C. ^ I ^ R l.WME ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 1750^ ^ � C ^ ^ I ^ R l.WM}G ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 18000 I , R LWME 18500 ^ C ^ ^ I ^ R lJJ E 1900^ . C ^ ^ I ^ R LW E ^ , ^ ^ ^ ' ' 1950^ ^ C ^ ^ I ^ R l.W E ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 2000^ ^ C ^ C. I ^ R lJW ^E 2050^ ^ C ^ ^ I ^ R l. W^E ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ .' -2100, ''^— 'C ` . ^ I , Rl. W^EM 2150, ^ C ^ ^ I . R lJW^Ell ' ^ ^ ^ C. ^ 2200^ ^ C ' , ^ I ^ R lJw^Ell 2250o C ^ ^ I ^ Rl.W^E M 2300^ ^ C ^ , I ^ Rl.W^ Ell 2350^ ^ C , ^ I ^ RlJW^ E M ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 2400, ^ C ^ , I ^ 1J4.1^ E M ^ , ^ ^ ^ 2450^ ^' C ^ ^ I ^ l. W }� M ^ ^ ^ ^ C. 25OO^ , C ^ ^ I ^ l. W E, M 2532^OO 2550^ ^ C C. ^ I ^ lJRW E M 2600, ^ C . ^ I ^ lJ�W E M 2650^ ^ C ^ C. I ^ l. W lG M ^ ^ ^ C. ^ 2700. ^ C W E M ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 2750^ ^ C ^ ^ I ^ L. ^W }], M ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 2800, ^ C , ^ I , l. ^W E M ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 28500 ^ C ^ ^ I ^ l. ^W E M 2900. � ^W E M 2950^ ^ C ^ ^ I ^ l. ^W }� M ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ` 3000. ^ C I ^ LR , W E M ^ 3050 ^ C ^ ^ I ^ LR ^ W E M ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 31000 , C ^ ^ I , 1..R ^ W E M ^ , 3150^ ^ C W ]G M ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 3200+ ^ ' C ^ ' , � I , L ^ W M^ ' ^ ^ ^ ^ 3250 ^ ^ I ^ l. ^ W E M^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 33000 ^ C ^ ^ I ^ l. ^ W }� M^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 335O^ ^ C - ^ ^ I ^ l. ^ W H M ^ ^ ^ ^ 3382^0O 3400^ ^ C ^ ^ I ^ L ^ W E M ^ ^ ^ ^ 3450^ ^ C ^ ^ I ^ l. ^ W M^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 3500, ^ C ^ ^ I ^ lJ W E M ^ 3550^ ^ C ^ ^ I ^ ^l. W E 'M ^ 3600. , C ^ ^ I ^ , l. W EM ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 3650, ^ C ^ ^ I ^ ^ lJJ E, ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 3700, ^ C ^ ^ I ^ ^ WRM� ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 3750, ^ C ^ ^ I ^ ^ WlJS ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 3800. ^ C , ^ I ^ ^ MW E ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 3850^ ^ C ^ ^ I ^ ^ MW El ^ 3900, ^ C ^ ^ I ^ ^ M W E LR ^ ^ ^ ^ 390000 3950^ ^ C ^ ^ I ^ ^ M WE l. ^ ^ ^ ^ 3964^00 4000^ . C , ^ I ^ ^ M WE 4050^ ^ C ^ ^ I ^ ^ l.M R WE ^ ^ ^ ^ 4100, ^ C ^ ^ I , +l. R WE 4114^00 4150^ ^ C ^ ^ I ^ L ^ R WE M 4200, ^ C ^ ^ I ^ L ^ R WE M ^ ^ ^ ^ 4250^ ^ C ^ ^ I ^ l. ^ R WE M ^ ^ ^ ^ 4300. , C 0 ^ I l. ^ R WE M ^ ^ ^ ^ 24 455^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X 460^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X ^ ^ WE ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 465^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X ^ ^ WE ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 470^ , ^ ^ ^ ^ X 475^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X ^ ^ WE ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 480^ ^ , ^ ^ ^ X ^ , W� ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 485^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X ^ ^ WE ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 490^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X 495^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X ^ ^ WE ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 50O^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X ^ ^ W1.?, ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 25 505^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X ^ ^ W� 51O^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X ^ ^ WE ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 515^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X ^ ^ W� ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 520^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^X ^ ^ WE ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 525^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^X ^ ^ WE ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 530^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^X ^ ^ WE ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 535^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X ^ , WE ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 540^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X ^ ^ WE ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 27 545^ , ^ ^ ^ XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX ^ ^ ^ ^ 55O^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X ^ ^ ^ ^ 555^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X ^ ^ ^ ^ 560^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X 28 565^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ , ^ X NRD= O ELLC= 9999999^00 ELTRD= 9999999^00 EL( I ) /STA( I ) 40^40 ^O0 33^90 87^00 28^60 97 ^00 26^60 101 ^00 2600 108^00 2600 12000 26^60 132^00 26^ 10 142^00 25 ^60 153,00 25^ 10 159^00 24^70 169^00 24^70 178^00 25,40 189^OO 28^40 195^OO 32,40 2O4^00 3050 23200 34^ 10 285 ^00 33^50 331 ^00 34^00 342^00 42^30 380^00 42^30 435^O0 33^00 435^00 32^70 455^OO 32^40 505^00 32^00 545^00 39^O0 545^00 40^00 56700 1 PROFILE FOR STREAM CEDAR RIVER-100 YR FLOW PLOTTED POINTS (BY PRIORITY) -E-ENERCY/W-WATER SURFACE/I-INVERT/C-CRITICAL W^S^ /L-LEFT BAND/R-RIGHT BAND/M-LOWER END STA ELEVATION -5^ O^ 5^ 1O^ 15 ^ 20^ 25^ 30^ 35^ 40^ SECNO CUMDIS ^ 10 0. 50. ^ C 62^00 10O. ^ C I ^ ^ W^ E LR M^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 15O^ ^ C I ^ ^ W E �R 171 ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 200^ ^ C I ^ ^ W 250^ ^ C I ^ ^ W E M ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 300. ^ C I ^ ^ W LR M ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 350^ ^ C I ^ ,W E L M ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 400^ ^ C ^ I ^ ^W E 11 M ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 450. ^ C ^ I ^ ^W E L M ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 500^ ^ C . I , ^W L M ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 550^ ^ C ^ I ^ ^ W E L M ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 600^ ^ C ^ I ^ ^ W EL M ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 650^ ^ C ^ I , ^ W E L M ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 700. ^ C ^ I ^ ^ W E 1,11 ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 750^ ^ C ^ I ^ ^ W RELM ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 800. ^ C ^ I ^ ^ W R1'."'LM 850, ^ C ^ I ^ ^ W RE Ul ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 892 ^00 90O^ ^ C ^ ^ I ^ WR E ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 950^ ^ C ^ ^ I ^ WR H ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 1000, ^ C , ^ I ^ WR I.?M 125^ ^ ^ X ^ ^ ^ ^ C. Wb ^ ^ ^ 8 130^ , ^ X ^ ^ , ^ , WE ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 1350 ^ ^ X ^ ^ C. ^ I. WE ^ ^ ^ ^ 9 140^ ^ ^X , ^ . ^ ^ WE ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 1456 ^ X^ ^ ^ ^ C. ^ WE ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 150^ ^ X ^ ^ , C. ^ ^ WE 1O 155^ ^ X ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ W)G ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 11 160^ , X ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ WE 165^ ^ X ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ WE ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 12 170^ ^ X , . ^ ^ ^ ^ WE 175^ ^ X ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ WE ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 13 18O, ^ X ^ ^ ^ ^ , , WE 1850 ^ X ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ WH ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 14 190^ ^ X , ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ WE ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 15 1950 ^ ^ ^ X ^ ^ ^ WE ^ ^ ^ ^ C. 200^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X ^ ^ ^ WE ^ ^ ^ ^ I. 16 205^ ^ ^ ^ ^ C. X ^ ^ WE ^ ^ ^ ^ BAND^ 210^ , ^ ^ ^ ^ X ^ ^ WE ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 215^ ^ ^ C. ^ ^ X ^ ^ WE ^ ^ ^ C. ^ 220^ ^ . ^ , ^ X ^ ^ WE ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 225^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X ^ ^ WE 17 230^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X ^ � ^ WE 235^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X ^ ^ WE ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 240^ ^ ^ + ^ ^ X ^ . ^ W)G ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 245^ ^ C. X ^ ^ WE ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 250^ , , . ^ ^ X , ^ WE ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 255^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X ^ ^ WE ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 26()^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X ^ ^ WE ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 265^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X ^ ^ WE ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 270^ , ^ ^ ^ ^ X^ ^ WE 275^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X^ ^ WE ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 280^ + ^ ^ ^ ^ X ^ WE ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 18 285^ ^ ^ C. ^ ^ X ^ WE ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 290^ ^ ^ , , , X ^ WE ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 295, ^ ^ C. ^ ^ X ^ WE ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 300^ X , WE ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 305^ ^ C. ^ ^ ^ X^ ^ W� ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 310, , , ^ ^ ^ X, ^ WE 3150 C. X^ ^ WE ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ` 320^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X ^ ^ WE 325^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X ^ ^ W}� ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 19 330^ ^ , ^ ^ , X ^ ^ WE ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 335^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X^ ^ WE ^ ^ C. ^ ^ 20 340, ^ ^ , ^ ^ X ^ WE ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 345^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X ^ WE ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 3500 ^ ^ ^ ^ . ^ ^X WE , ^ ^ ^ ^ 3550 ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 3609 ^ ^ , , ^ ^ ^ , X 365^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X ^ ^ ^ ^ 370^ , ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ , ^ X 375^ ^ I. ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ C. , X ^ C. ^ 21 3800 ^ ^ ^ ^ ' ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^X ^ . ^X ^ ^ 390, ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^X ^ ^ 395^ ^ C. ^ C. ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^X ^ ^ 400^ ^ , '^ C. ^ ^ , ^ ^ ^X 405^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^X ^ ^ 41O^ X ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ . ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 415^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^X ^ C. 420, ^ ^ , ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ,X ^ ^ 425^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^X ^ ^ 430, ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ , ^X ^ ^ 23 435, ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX ^ ^ 440^ ^ ^ ^ ^ , X , , WE 445^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X ^ ^ WE 3265 DIVIDED FLOW 3301 HV CHANCED MORE THAN HVINS ADD X - SEC AT STONEWAY NO ENCROACHMEN� 9736^00 12,22 36^92 ^OO ^O0 37^23 ^31 .54 ^31 33^90 8530^ 79^ 6039^ 2412, 62^ 1185, 1007 ^ 235. 34^ 32^40 ^33 1 ^29 5^09 2^40 ^050 ^044 ^050 ^OOO 24^70 46^41 ^001079 310, 290^ 370 2 O 0 ^OO 419^01 545^00 O *SECNO 10236000 33O1 HV CHANCED N HVINS 10236^00 10^27 37^67 .00 ^OO 38^51 ^84 ^88 ^39 55.00 8530^ O^ 8530 ^ O^ O^ 1162^ O^ 257^ 38^ 4000 ^35 ,OO 7.34 ,OO .050 ^044 ^050 ^000 27^40 38,71 ^002859 490^ 500^ 725^ 2 O O ^00 135 ^52 174^23 O CCHV= ^ 100 O *SECNO 11156^000 11156^00 12,49 40^ 19 ^OO ^OO 41 ^26 1 ^08 068 ^07 41 ^30 8530^ O^ 8467 ^ 63^ O^ 1014^ 40^ 281 ^ 41 ^ 38^90 ^38 ,OO 8^35 1055 , 050 ^044 , 050 ^OOO 27 ^70 10^93 ^002968 820^ 920^ 970^ 2 O O ^OO 142^43 153^36 O 1 CROSS SECTION 9736^00 S1741TAM CEDAR RIVER-100 YR FLOW P 0 F AMDED %- 0Q AT WA,,-/ DISCHARGE- 8530^ PLOTTED POINTS (BY PRIORITY) -B=BOTTOM BRIDCE/T=TOP BRIDCE/X=CROUND/W=WATER SUR/E=ENERCY GRADIENT/C=CRITICAL WSEL El.EV 24 ^ 26^ 28^ 30^ 32^ 34^ 36^ 38^ 40 ^ 42^ 44^ STA-FEET 2 O^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X ^ ^ ^ 5 ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ x ^ ^ ^ 10^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X ^ ^ ^ ^ 15^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X ^ ^ ^ ^ 20^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X ^ . ^ ^ 25^ ^ , ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X ^ ^ ^ ^ 30^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^X ^ ^ ^ ^ 35^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X ^ , ^ ^ ^ 40^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 45 ^ ^ , ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 50 ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X WE ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 55^ I. ^ ^ ^ ^ I. ^X WE ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 60^ ^ C. ^ , ^ ^ X WE ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 65^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X I. ^ ^ ^ 70^ , ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X ^ WE ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 75^ I. ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X ^ W ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 800 ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ , X ^ WE ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 3 85^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X ^ I. ^ ^ BAND ^ 90^ . ^ ^ ^ X ^ ^ ^ WE ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 4 95^ ^ ^ ^ X I. ^ ^ ^ WE ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 5 100^ ^ , X ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ WE ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 105^ I. ^ X ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ WE ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 6 110^ ^ , X , ^ ^ ^ ^ WE ^ , ^ ^ ^ 115^ I. ^ X LI ',...MV,..1 96 z••• I 17 T.I 4-..'.0/2:2./1 7.•0 0 >.:1V 'I F.I.N Ilk.)HO OE,I,V'I 1131 V 0 6 2,'6 ‘ :::,)..,I,:1:::....11::YEI A F:I. I.:1:;"....1}.:I. S I '72...E.: ::: 'S't9 :•:I.f.-.1(I:I:>.:11:1: 021v E‘, maid mol to st:i3kri.f.) 000 9 El7 9 0 biaa5,3* ()0'cc :I ()0'tv 00':F.::9 0 0' 00'E:: 0:.:::;' I ..;2:' I 1.11-13M1 SS V 3.-;..1 V..i dila :Dila 1%01(.I.>...1 0,.....0:3::3 d 0>I X >XX IS • 0 0 t?'9i?I 0 2:'02 I 00* () () 2 '0 I E:: '0 I Es: '0..!':.2 0 2:'2:2, 0 I '6E:: 09' T 2 '.62 000' '96 I S.17 0' '0 Sr.?,0' '9 i.:.1.... . S is 0' '() 00' '0 V I.'CT; '0....:,S 8 00' '() 2:2 0 T *2 Es, t7 0 LS' 6 I ' 1: 6 i7 EC 00' 00' OE::°2 E.', 02:'0 1: 00 . a)(II WI A V M >.:1 F1 S1101-1 V F.I......1"1.Y.I. 0()' I V :::V',a"I 13:‘H A 1:E.:Odd:a-NON (11.:(14 I:1 5.3 S V Vii;'...1 V >I N V la d RAO S6 VE 000*2 0 tY ii? 0 1,1:::)F.):5.3 iii:- 0 . - 617'V V 2 90'F.::2 I 00' 0 . 0 I '0 9 4 0 i.f... 4 0 6 tY .1 0 0 4 0.r.?;4 2:f.?; 0 0 0 4 c:i'fr 0'' 0::::.;0 4 St).0 4 0 0 4 1:F.•''6 0 0 I 4 i.3 Z 4 6 9 T 4 0 4 Z Z.....6 '0 '0 '06ga '0 '0 C SO T' .......' i. .3*...?;6 0 0' 00' 9S' IC 9 6*.6 0 0 0 0'';•.*:',6 0 9 0 1,10 S if* 0 I 1 -7,'9 E‘,T 0 0* 0 () () '2:::;;;1: '2:::;;;T '2:Y:i;1: I 2,'E',I 00' 000' S 2 0' 000' 00 4 I.I 'i.:1 00 . -- Ca'''ff.:,Es, '2:.?, Z. 1: '0 i7 0 I. 4 0 4 0 4 OC ga 4 0 4C3 0 0 0 4 0 tS 0 0 4 S.I: 4 tY 0 4 I 0 S 4 F:E. 00' 00 4 9 t7 4 I E: 9 0*0 T . 0 0 4 '::V FRI T....j 0 0 4 0.;; '':V FA'In i.:Y.':a i"1:1:as33:a t..rd...N 0 N (121.111 5.3 S V V a d V )3:1%1 0 0 4 0 cl 0 9 4 i3 6 '0()0 il'.. '.1:-,6...1...I ''06S ci '() 0:2;* 0 6 V 3;•....11.7„:3 ad:LTA ::31"1.3. a I o 2::a d v...i,x, v a d v :( molo d..r.amt..) c H .3 reel o 3: • ' 0::1:11.:-.1 0,I, d V d 0:::1 .1.,11 0:::)I: :::)(I 1: "I V:1:>AI..r d a o...,i.x Hai x .7.a cry.X H.:107S VI SS III krIEI NIA ' ;'...IN X HO N X ''IN X U.0:::11") F1 3(.1 air I A MAI I.Y.. ,I,1-10 I ....I./,1.„4.W.I. V 11.1., 1 0 i") :::)..0;Ilk) H:..)V ill 0.IC) ;:..1.0...ii.1 I-13 13 a wit} to riErra >I N v a s s.3 o 1 o -1.1-1 nil .....:Ya Trii 8 II 5:311:1: to Ta 53110 1-1,1.4:13:(I 9 I 3:f.)V-.1 9 E: I 17 I I I ' e.::•, 4 :::V R.d V 13:1,1 N V 1-1::] a 3:,I,VI.(10"I V 0 C.:1 0'6 '' :::,x...1.‘:I:3019:n ';'.10(.1.1::"..:1:-:-I 2:0' I E ::: *5.3'11 EMU:1:.;....1}3: 021.7E 111:314 M 01 V :3 S kri.::) 0 00*2 0 0 ti3 ON:XIS* 09' I 00'6 6:16 I 00'9 0 0' I 0 I 0 0' 00'E.:: 0 ' I X.X ',as :t:du 'iv..r.::ya.....15.3 o ,,f:cl 6 ty T 0 1.: Es, 1: 00''' 0 0 i:::, '''00.1: ''0 I 1: ' I 1: SECNO DEPTH CWSEL CRIWS WSELD EG HV H� OLOSS BAND �l�V Q Q�OB QCH QROB A�OB ACH AROB VOL �WA TIME VLOB UCH VROB XNL XNCH XNR S�OP� XLOBL XLCH XLOBR ITRIAL IDC ICONT CORAR TOPWID ENDS� �CPRS �C�WC H3 QW�IR QLOW BAREA TRAPEZOID ELLC ELTRD AREA ^00 33^64 ^22 O^ 85300 1270, 1269^ 35000 41 ,00 3495 OVERBAND AREA ASSUMED NON-EFFECTIVE/ELLEA= 41 ^00 ELREA= 41 .00 8436^00 1002 32^52 ^OO ^OO 33,64 102 ^ 16 ^00 32^ 1O 85300 0. 8530^ O, O^ 1003^ O, 197, 29^ 39010 ^28 ,OO ' 8^51 ^OO 0000 ^025 ^OOO ^OOO 21 ^60 27^70 ^OO1276 34^ 34^ 34^ O O O ^OO 120^99 148^69 O CCHV= ,300 CEfV= .870 *SECNO 8470000 RAILROAD BRIDGE 8476^OO 13,03 3053 .00 ,00 34^OO 1 ^46 ,06 ,29 45^50 853O^ 0^ 8530^ O, O^ 8796 O^ 197^ 29^ 43^30 ^28 ^OO 9^70 ^OO ,045 ^025 ,045 ^000 19,50 27,06 ^001639 40^ 40^ 40^ 2 O O ,OO 102^03 129^09 O . CCHV= ^ 100 CEHV= ^300 *SECNO 8590000 3265 DIVIDED FLOW N� 3301 HV CHANGED MORE THAN HVINS I-4O5 859600 11 ^79 33^59 000 ^OO 34.29 ^69 ,21 ^08 34^60 85306 O^ 8527^ 3^ O^ 1277^ 2^ 200^ 29^ 3050 ^28 ,OO 6168 1008 .050 0035 ,040 ,OOO 21 ,80 70,35 ^001962 160^ 1200 100^ 3 O O ^OO ` 152,37 234^73 O *SECNO 8836,000 883600 11 ,22 34^02 ,OO 000 34^76 ^74 ^46 001 48,80 8530^ O^ 85300 O^ O^ 1234^ O^ 207^ 300 34^80 ^29 ,OO 6^91 ,OO ^050 0035 ,04O ^000 22^80' 3005 0001855 2300 2409 23O^ 0 O / O ^OO 158^77 18902 J. O 04/22/87 11:4106 PACE 18 SECNO DEPTH CWS}�L CRIWS WSELD EG HV Ill. O�OSS BAND ���V Q Q�DB AROB VOL �WA LEFT/RIGHT �IM}� VLOB VCH VROB XN� XNCH XNR WTN E L I'll N SS�A Sl.OPE X1.0131.1 XLCH XLOBR ITRIAL IDC ICONT CORAR TOPWID ENDST . *SECNO 9446000 944600 10.70 35030 ,OO ^OO 36^38 1 ^09 1 ^52 010 49.80 8530^ O^ 8520^ 10^ O^ 1017^ 1O^ 223^ 32^ 3400 - ^31 ,OO 8638 1005 ,05O ^044 0050 ^OOO 24^60 23^57 ^003525 570. 610^ 650^ 2 O O ^OO 13502 158089 O 0046C ^Z3 ^C8T ^O MOT ^O 00 4OCS8 40 ^OCS8 OO^0v 800 zT ^ 600T SC^3C OO^ OO^ 93^ TC 9806 OO^SP8Z M88I7 / OO^Os =V3873 OO^OS =V3?�3 3AIx33aa3-NON a3WOSSV V38V DNV883AO �6�8 O004SM ON33S* O PC^V91 PC^PTT OO^ 0 0 3 ^OT ^OT ^OT TW0O^ TO^OS OZ413 0004 Sh0^ MOO ShO^ OO^ CC^6 OO^ s3^ OT ^0V 'z3 ^ T8T ^O ^P16 00 ^O 006s8 +O 40CG8 OO^OV 900 304 9C4T OT ^3C OO^ OO^ SZ^OC S006 OO^GCZZ / 0O^Ov =V3873 O0^Ov =V3773 3AIl33arI3-NON a3WOSSV V38V DNV883AO MMC ` O0O^GCZZ 01133S* O ` 68069T 8C090T 000 0 0 3 ^3z ^3z ^3Z MT3OO^ TOM O& T3 OOO^ St'O^ S30^ sh0^ OO^ TO^0T OO^ S3^' OT ^Ov ^Z3 ^ TRT ^O ^3S8 ^O ^O ^0CS8 ^O ^OCS8 OO^Ov Z0^ C3^ 901 3O^3C OO^ OO^ 9v40C MOW OO^S3ZZ / OT ^Op =3173 XVW 00000 =O8��3 NIW ZT =a8N 3naI88 iVW8ON OzCC MOia O3OIAIO s93C iSaN3 OIMJOJL 8V803 IN03I 3OI 7VI8iI 88O7X H37X 7807X 3JO7S V�SS 1%1IWl3 7NX 8O8A H3A 807A 3WI� lHOI8/la37 VML 70A 808V 13V 8OIV 8O8O 1430 8070 O A373 DNV8 SS070 7H AH OR D73SM 3MI83 73SM3 H�J3O ON33S �T 3DVJ 90THTT M33/vO T OOO^SUZ ON33S* O 8O^C9T M^SOT OO^ O O O ^OT ^OT ^OT 3OTSOO4 TO^OG 0v T3 000, Sh0^ SCO^ Sh0^ 000 M^OT OO^ s3^ OT ^0V 093 06LT ^O 086L ^O ^O 40CSR ^O ^0008 OO^OP 800 PO^ 8Z^ T 3Z^ TC OO^ 000 S6^63 M^8 O0^CG9Z 3oOI88 xVM NOSNO88 /OT ^0v =3773 XVW 0000V -(l8�73 NIW zT =00N 3n(lI88 7VW8ON OMC MOu O3(lIAIa s93C 0000Cs9z ON33S* 0080 =AH33 OOC^ =AH33 O SO^C9T SO^CTT OO^ O O 3 ^OZT ^09T 009T CT83OO^ OO^OG O�^ T3 OOO^ S904 R304 shO^ OO^ MOT OO^ S3^ OT ^0N 093 06ZT ^O ^ T38 ^O ^O ^OCS8 ^O ^0CS8 O3^33 8T ^ 83^ 894T 190TC OO^ OO^ C6463 C3^8 000C99Z � 0O^OP =V3873 0O^Ov =V3773/3Am33am-NON a3WOSSV V38V >{NV883AO S6VC _ O0O^CP9Z ON33S* OOs^ =AH33 OOT ^ =AH33 O OO^M 194Z3T OO^ O O 3 ^ORC ^O8C OOZE TZTTOO^ 66^Z3 OC^ T3 0004 ShO^ O3O^ Si'O^ 000 8T06 000 s3^ � SECNO DEPTH CW681. qRIWS WSELD EC HV HI. OL.OSS BAND ElIEV Q Q�OB QCH QROB A�OB ACH AROB VOL. LEFT/RIGHT ���/RICH� ' ' ) � ' TIME VlOB VCH VROB XNL XNCH XNR WTN ELMIN SSTA ' SLOPE . XLOBL XLCH' Xl.OBR ITRIAL IDC ICONT CORAR TOPWID ENDS'.(* . *SBCNO 69214000 ^ . 6921 ^00 9,69 29^ 19 ,OO .00 30.18 099 ,34 008 35.90 , 8530^ O^ 85300 O^ O^ 1068^ O^ 163^ 24^ 36^2O ^23 ,OO ` 7099 000 .045 025 ^045 0000 19050 10,01 ^001151 240^ 240^ 240^ 2 O O ^OO 124^00 134^00 O - ` CCHV= ,300 CEHV= 0800 *SECNO 6931 ^00O - .3265 DIVIDED FLOW ' . 3370 NORMAL. BRIDCE/NRD= 14 MIN ELTRD= 35.9O' MAX. EL[C= 3020 WELLS AVENUE BRIDGE 6931 ,00 9070 29^20 ^OO ^OO 30,22 1 ^02 001 ,02 35.94) 85300 O^ 8530^ O^ O^ 10534 O^ ' 163^ 24^ 36^2O ^23 ,OO 8010 .00 ,O45 ^030 .045 ^OOO 19^50 10001 ^OV1856 1O^ 10^ 1O^ O O O ^OO 121 ^OO 134^00 O . *SECNO 6973,000 - 3265 DIVIDED FLOW ` , ` . 3370 NORMAL BRIDQG/NRD= 14 MIN ELTRD= 3500 MAX ELLC= 3600 _ 6973^OO 9081 29631 000 ^OO 30^30 099 008 001 35090 85300 O^ 85300 0^ 00 1066, O, 164. 24^ 36,20 ^23 ^OO 8^00 ^OO ,045 0030 ^045 ^OOO 19650 10001 .001792 42. 42, 42. 2 0 0 ,OO 121 ^O0 134,O0 O ' *SECNO 6983,000 6983.00 9088 29,38 ,OO ^OO 30033 ,95 001 ^01 35.90 85300 O^ 8530^ O^ O^ 10910 O^ 165^ 24^ 3020 ,23 ,OO 7,82 ,OO ^045 .025 ^045 ^OOO 19050 10.01 ^OO1076 100 100 101. 2 O O .00 124^00 134^00 O 1 04/22/87 104106 PACE 14 SECNO DEPTH CWSEL CRIWS WSELD ECI . O1.OSS BAND E1,EV Q Q�OB QCH QROB A�OB CH AROB VOL, TWA ����/RICH�� � � TIME VL.OB VCH VROB XNLI XNCH XNR WTN ELMIN SSTA ' SLOPE XLOBL. XLCH XLOBR ITRIAL IDC ICONT CORAR TOPWID ENDST CCHV= ^ 100 CEHV= ,400 ' *SECNO 71O3^0OO 7103^00 8.81 29^41 ^OO ^OO 30^57 106 .16 009 33.60 85300 O^ 8520+ . 100 O^ 983^ 71 167^ 25^ 2700 ^24 ^OO 807 1 ,44 .045 ^025 ^045 0000 20^6O 2505 . ^OO1611 120^ 120^ 130^ 2 O O ^OO 139^55 164^90 ` O *SECNO 7480000 7483^OO 8.54 29^84 ,OO ^OO 31 , 15 1 ^31 .52 ^06 35000 ... . () OE:'CS'El: 6 ti 4 9 i...*..T 0 0* 0 0 ar *0;.:.1 T '0 tY T '()V T C C I I. I 9* T T 0 i7'6 T ()()()' :::.;17 0* f':;', ()4 S tY 0' 00' S 0'6 0 0 t?e') ():::.':c:',9 OE'29 OE .?0' E 2' 41.:2,* T 9 I. i$)2: 0 0' ()() (.::,t7"i.3 2, e!)0'...f) 0() I 9 0 00' :9 9 9 014 3 . () ' . il.:1'C E T ()()' 0 () () 'e.::,C • '6 C '6 E• 0 0 0* gi i..?;0 4 0 0 0* 00* acl 4 9 0 0 0 0*K.: *C*.Ye *tY 5;1: "0 *t7 6$ * ' *0::.:.:5;9 "0 '0 17 I " I i.:tY'6 ; ()()4 0 0* C.:','E.:'92 CZ':'6 ()()' I i7c:i 9 . , ';3:d 1.;.:I 0 Cri'17 C V H11 FI‘:in 1:a,ayf.Ada-NN a a kins s t..:.) vip.iv zi,.1 v}a d RAO !;;',t1.1t7 E 0 S.3'ti E.: 0 I ' ' '9 6 2,I '()E.:S 9 '0 0-fr' i:17,'62: ()()' V:•:fel V a T.o z a...11...)d,x, km-died 11 0 1 t3 ...d I Fif 11 ) • ' • :-....1 V 13:14 14 V 1-1::3 0::a I,V''I.f 1::31.V 3 '1:;',T '()I 4 :::A 3.,I 3 Crna A F.R3 a I d iic. el.:1 tv'Z.:iT, ::: 'S'ri :: (:(:I:d}A 0 2 V E . ri(31 r::( M 01 V SSV1::3 ; ()()() T 17 2-'1 (314:::):T.3-K • ()()''OF, ()0'0 2 '12' T , 0 0'91.f)2:T 0 T 4 I I 0 0 4 tY I T 0 0* 0 0 4 6 0 E.;* I 0 6 4 111-1 0 TH S S V 1:P.:1 V:-1 .:-.1 11...1. ::3 1'1 I-1 . 14 Zi: ):(I d 0;::(0::3 HO>I X >I X :-.):S ' F:10(I:1:d',...I "I 3;a...IS III/ 0 T c'2.4-::T 9 9'2.:E'',I ()()' () 02 '()9 t7 '0 617. . . tY 9 4 6 E it.1: 4,6 T ()()()' c 17 ..c.,'P.()' 0 if; ()()' 2 2: ()()'tY f.::: 'E.:2 'tY!;;;I '0 'i::::iv i!:.. '0 () '()E.: It 9 0 9 t7 C t 0' 17 9* ..K.: I 2:'4::,2: ()0' 0() E,.:')'I 2, E V C1 ()()'2 0 S 9 FT:3(I:1:>.:1 8: F..):n ma NO :Hi'14 V I 11:1:ll 0 i.:1 4 117 Es, :::k..1;:-Y.''):"HI 4 F:1.("1 I jaa a;:i.a-Noll a'3'.14(*I S S t....) V 2:d V >1.N ...):d a ri 0 ()()()''2':•()c 9 (314:::KIS* 0 V E::I (It)' () 0 2; '0 4 0 S.e: *0 S 2: IIi 9 I 0 0 9 6'I.2: ()I ''1.3 I (i0()' c ts 0' g.......",()' ..ct V()' fit .."; f *eli 0 0* 0 g* 0 8*6 ::: * *::::tY 1: *0 *'17 I.6 *0 *0 *0 E:gi il1 4 0 *0 C!;;;8 - 09' ,.:1 2: .0 2:' I E' 6 I ' T ....Ks.s...i.....,... oo. of * f.::: ,?...-..?: so.6. oo.2:T 0':.::' 0 0 0'',.?:109 0 14:::K.:(S4* (I 1:11,:l 0 I ....1 V d()::3 IN 0:::1:1: :D(I I 1 t.....):1:d I:1: '?...13:01 X 1-1:::11 X It I 14 1'a 1%1.1.,f1 >Al.-1X I-1 )1%1 X '114 X *I 0 d ri F1:::)01 ','':'I 0"I(1 F.4141 I j., J.IA:'::)I Z....1/..i.„4.1:11. 'On", 1011 8:0 8V 1-1:::00 .11 0"PO *I.0 H E3 H:::)if.) i.i.0 1 0 t) "il-I A 1-1 .):-...I Al a E..lit S II I.;11.....3 "I.:a S II 3 I-I Ida a 01%13 a S I 17 ('i 0 0''•::?C.:1 I ()0 T 00* () () E 'i.:1 I T '9 I I '9 T T. ,...:-..s6.000. cl* ...I 0 0 0 4 0(if gl;Z.0 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 Z..T 'L: 00' 6 I I 'Z:E',I '0 '(V)T I '() () 0 E!:','I i.:1 '() '()E f..;9 ()I '9 Z.....: 0()' I-.;' 0 9' 2:9'z.:'2":„ ()()' ()()' 2 0'A.::.....-. 2 c'6 V a.>.:11'd ()V'2 E; :::k;Pa''Il:•:.):4.:):():1:J.,::::e cl.,..I.la-14 0 14 (E:(141I3S k.:•1 V Rd V N.N V 0..>.:1 Fa(1 0 *.c;":...17 IE O CCHV= ,3OO CEHV= .800 *SECNO 4114^000 3495 OVERBAND AREA ASSUMED NON—EFFECTIVE/ELLEA= 50.00 HLREA= 50^00 411400 10^32 2402 ^OO ^00 25^55 673 ^ 10 ^ 16 18^20 85300 O^ 85300 O. O^ 1242^ O^ 95. 16^ 2200 ' ^ 13 ^00 6^87 ^OO .045 ^025 ^045 ^OOO 14^50 1432^ 10 0OOO719 1500 150^ 150, 2 O O ,OO 135^20 1567,3O O CCHVz . 100 CEHV= ^300 *SECNO 4654^000 3495 OVERBAND AREA ASSUMED NON—EFFECTIVE/ELLEA= 5O^OO ELREA= 50400 4654^00 9^55 25^ 15 000 ^OO 26^06 ^90 ^45 ^05 21 ^70 85300 O. 85300 O. O^ 1118. O^ 109, 17^ 21 ^80 0 15 ^OO 7^63 ^OO ^045 ^025 ^045 ^OOO 1500 1492^3O 0000993 540. 540^ 540, J. O O ^OO 13200 1624.6O 1 04/22/87 11 :41 :36 PACE S�CNO DEPTH CWSEL (OR IWS WSELD EC HV HL OLOSS BAND ELEV Q Q�OB QCH QROB ALOB ACH AROB VOL TWA L I..",FT/RICH�� TIME VLOB VCH VROB XNL XNCH XNR WTN ELMIN SSTA SLOPE XLOBL XLCH XLOBR ITRIAL IDC ICONT CORAR TOPWID ENDST *SECNO 5244^000 3495 OVERBAND AREA ASSUMED NON—E},FECTIVE/ELLEA= 50^00 ELREA= 50000 n� 5244^OO 9^31 25^71 ^OO ^OO 26^77 1 ^06 ,66 ^05 23^6O ' 85300 0. 85300 O, O^ 1034. O. 124. 196 22^40 017 ,OO 8^25 ^OO ^045 ^025 ^045 ^OOO 16^40 248^3O ^OO1284 620^ 5900 550. 2 O O ,OO 132060 380^90 O CCHV= ^300 CEHV- ^500 *SECN ] 5644^000 3495 OVERBAND AREA ASSUMED NON—EFFECTIVE/ELLEA= 32^40 ELREA= 32.40 l.00AN AVENUE BRIDGE 5644^OO 8,86 26^36 ^00 ^OO 27,31 095 ^51 ^03 26. 1O 85306 O^ 8530^ O^ O^ 10890 O^ 1330 20^ . 24^90 019 .00 7^83 ,OO ^045 ^025 .045 ^OOO 17050 34^00 ^OO1285 410^ 400^ 400^ 2 O O ^OO 152600 186^OO O SPECIAL BRIDGE ` SB XD XDOR COFQ RDLEN BWC BWP BAREA SS ELCHU 1 ^25 2^00 3^00 ^OO 17000 3^50 1243^OO ^OO 19^40 19^40 *SECNO 5762.000 PRESSURE FLOW ECPRS BA A TRAPEZOID ELLC ELTRD ARHA 27^82 27^38 010 0^ 8530^ 1243^ 1249, 26,90 3040 I T. '''..3'I:C I ()0't.:••T (DC)0 4 000 4 S Z.!,0 4 0 0(..)4 0 0 4 C S.3 4 S 0 0 4 0 0 S.i.1: 4 f:.1 I: ''.0 6 4 0 *t7 9 V T. '0 '0 4 0 C SIR '0 4 0?:.‘r'S'i...1 0 0 4 0(...)4 91 4 tr ZE 91.*or 00 4 11796E'r 0 0* V a 8'1 a 0 0 4 S 2: '''V a I'.j.3:4.:::/.ri..1..is a ad 1...na-AO N (...ra 14 11S V V Fif d V Yl.1%1 V}:I>.:Ig.(10 S6.17 Iii; CI 0'' I....?: ''e:E 0 4:'... 4 7.?.:0 6 '0 C.:gi 0 4 0 T 10a elk') a>.:1,I.,'Eg. arai. a I 0 22,::1 V:'...1.l., V a;Ilk):•Hi. >.-.1...I ti >.:1.1.all 1.0 CH MC:rid: FDA l'1S SR>.:1:41 0 0't7 9 6 C NO:1:,I,3 a S SS 0>.:1:....) ; ()00 4 i'796C 011:::KIS* T(:.::'c.I I E:'Si 1: ..cii.:';4 f.:::. 0 c.)4 F.:0 i!•:, 00 4 ty 00 4 9 I'1: (..)(.)4 00 4 f.:.*:. 00 4 1: S a:4 1: >"X HOC'.r.;I:1 a TO"OE....15....3 a:I:fl...I 0,I., Z....I k....1..`:-.1 0::..) ,I,1%1 0:::)I :::3 a:I: 1 V I>...i.):,..1.. dal...Y.1 X 1"10°I X 1(I 0 7.X 1.4 I IA113: 1%1,i,11 .....:1 1%1 X 1-131%1>::: 1.1%1 X 0:0:1:1(I I-1'.:30 (I 01r) ::::(1.1 I ,),110:r.8 a,aF:ri vm.r., -fon a o:,...1 V 113 V I:i.01 V 15 0.....-.1 0 1-13 t:3 0:010 0 N.:I la >I 1%1 V 9: SS 010 1 I-1 ( I-I t:rii >1.1.Fa'311' .'-.',PI:I: :•.1 0 1 HS IY) I-1 Id 9:cf. 01%10 HS ()I :•':):t..)V d 9 C I'17 z: I 'I:('I t7 C3''El 8 t7 I T 0 4 9 9 I 0()'' () 0 7..."; 4 0 i?.:f::i 4 0 e *:', '0 FS:i :ff.0 3 T o 0 C.0 4 1!.1 T C I 0 0'1(7.I: 0 0 0 4 .:1 17 0 4 S.....E 0 4 :cl1.:10* 0 0 4 2:f:i 4 41... 0 0 i7 E.;1:I 4 0 4 0 4 0 C S IC) 0 0 T ' L:1' ,3 ii' 19' :::‘,',....', 0 0'' 0 0' i?.,3 61'C:1 0 0'....?;0 6C Zi.!::)(...)::I: :II'. 01%1:1: .va>...r.f..,a or."sz :::V;-'1113:4.';'if.("I:I:I. )F5.Ad I-Y1.-1%1 0 1%1 MX 1.,1 11 SCI.;-1 V FA H V >1.1%1 V::::(..":-.13:A 0 '',',.1....'17 C NO I.,Y.,:::).ii S S S 1:3 el ) 0 0 C.)4..:.:',().-!....0 0 1%1Cra 6•*.g. 0 0 Si'' :::A I-1 F.I. :) 0 0(:::' 0 0 .-:-.', '0 1?-0 '0 gi i 3 ‘.)0*::...:: 2:1: 0.1:...?..4 0 0 0 4 Ste 0 4 cl 2:0 4 S V 0 4 0 0 4 '..;›0 4 6 ()0 4 1::1: 4 0 S 4 9 1: 4 1:..se:I: 4 9 1 '0 'iT,t7 6 4 0 4 0 0 C gil 0 '(If 'S 9 I. I2.:' T 9 1'75.'.: 0()4 0 0 4 1:S 4 1:7L 1:C 4 1.f., 0 0 4 0 S ::'V ip...r.rsa 0 0 4 0 S ' :''V F.I Ilia...f i..1.( I,L 0 F..):,•:Y.;I a:-1%1(:)1%1 0:H1411S S V V Fil>...1V >I 1%IV a.....:13:AC) fi;6 17 000 C. 31,EGS* • 0 06* .1:0 tv.1: 017* I 17 T 0 C.)* 0 0 7, 4 0..c.1., *0-,'...Y, °0 6 6 S',6'1:C.:.0* 0 9;•.?;*1: 0 ty 4'F..T. 000 4 S',tY 0 C. ::;',:.v: 4 S V.(.)4 0 0 4 4 6 0 0 4 0 0 ).1: '„F.:f:;, '0 4 SI E;i'I.1 *C.) 4 0 C. 0::se S:"/ 4 0 4 OCSi.:1 0 0 4 ..:;;; V'.....Y.:....rna 0 0 4 0 S :::V Fri I ia 4.il ri..1..ti......la a CI a-NO F*1 >)".1%11z,i i'i'....:1Fif AO '.:.?;C ;;F, 0 1%1'...3',...I(3* 0 *S�CNO ^ 100 3495 OVERBAND AREA ASSUMED NON-E}:FECTIVE/ELLEA= 2070 ELREA= 22.70 LAKE WASHINCTON 010 11 ^46 1406 .00 14^00 15080 1053 .00 000 17^40 8530^ O^ 85300 ' O, O^ 858^ O^ O^ O^ 1800 ^OO ^OO 9^94 ^OO 0035 025 ^035 0000 200 35^ 17 ^003047 O^ O^ O^ 0 O 3 ^OO 155^ 14 190^31 O CCHV= ,300 CEHVc ,500 SPECIAL BRIDGE 5227 DOWNSTREAM ELEV IS 12^63 /NOT 14.26 HYDRAULIC JUMP OCCURS DOWNSTREAM (IF LOW FLOW CONTROLS) SB XD XDOR COFQ BAREA SS �1.CHU ELCHD 1 ,25 1050 3000 ^OO 160^00 8,00 149500 000 8090 8090 *SECNO 62000 CLASS B LOW FLOW 3420 BRIDGE W.S^ = 13^51 BRIDGE VELOCITY- / 12018 CALCULATED CHANNEL AREA= / 700, �Qq: 3 131C1WC 1.13 R BAREA TRAPEZOID 8LLC ELTRD AREA ^OO 15098 000 O^ 8530^ 1495^ 1490^ 18^70 2200 ' 3495 OVERBAND AREA ASSUMED NON-EFFECTIVE/ELLEA= 22^7O ELREA= 2070 U/S END OF NORTH BOEING BRIDGE 62^00 11 ^84 14^64 ^OO ^OO 15,98 1035 ^ 18 .00 17,40 85300 O^ 85306 O^ O^ 916, O^ 1 ^ O^ 1800 ^OO 000 9031 ,OO ,OOO ^025 ^OOO ^OOO 200 34,43 ^002475 62^ 62^ 62^ O ' O O ^OO 15504 190037 O *SECNO 892^000 89000 6,45 16^75 000 000 18^29 1 ,54 2^21 010 18,60 85301 O, 85300 O^ O^ 856^ 0^ 18^ 3^ 17 ^40 ^02 ^O0 9097 ^OO .035 ^025 ,035 ,OOO 10,30 111 .85 ^002871 840^ 830^ 830^ 2 O O ^OO 147,79 259^64 O J. 04/22/87 104036 PACE 9 SECNO DEPTH CWSEL CRIWS WSELD I.-IV 01.10SS BAND Q Q�DB QCH QROB Al.OB ACH AROB VOL TWA ����/RICH� TIME VLOB VCH VR XNCH XNR WTN ELMIN SSTA SLOPE XLOBl. XLCH XLOBR ITRIAl. IDC ICONT CORAR TOPWID ENDS".(' CCHV= ^ 100 11300 *SECNO 1612.000 3265 DIVIDED FLOW 3301 HV CHANGED MORE THAN HVINS 1612^OO 7,79 18079 ,OO ^OO 19,67 ^89 1 ^32 ^07 18^40 8530^ 1 ^ 8436^ 93^ 2^ 1111 ^ 67^ 35^ 6^ 16^40 ^05 ,39 7^60 1039 ^045 ^025 ,045 ^OOO 11 ^00 252^85 NC +OOO ^OOO ^O35 ^3OO ^800 ^000 ^OOO ^OOO ^000 ^OOO BRONSON WAY BRIDGE X1 7653,000 17^000 50.000 179.000 10,0gO 10^000 10,000 ^000 ,OOO . ^OOO ` BT 170000 ^OOO 40^ 100 40^ 100 20^000 40^ 100 40^ 100 21 ^500 40^000 40,000 BT 48^000 40000 40^000 500000 40,000 40.000 50^010 40.000 33,800 67,800 BT 40^000 330800 980900 40^000 33^800 123,800 40000 330800 148^9O0 40000 BT 33^8OO 149000 40^000 31^800 149,510 40,OOO 33,800 157,000 40,000 33^800 BT 157^010 40^000 37^400 163000 40^000 37^400 174,800 40^000 37^400 179000 BT 40. 1OO 40^ 1OO ,OOO ^OOO ^OOO .0O0 ^OOO .00O ^0O0 .00O CR 40^ 100 ^O0O 40^ 100 20^000 40^000 21 ^500 400000 48.0O0 40^000 5O^OOO ' �R 22^2O0 50^010 22^OOO 67,800 21 ,700 98,900 21 ^700 123^800 22^600 148^900 OR 23000 149000 330800 149^510 33^800 1570000 29^900 157^010 29^9OO 163^000 OR 37,400 170800 40. 1OO 179,000 4000 0000 ,OOO ^OOO ,OOO .000 NC ^OOO ^OOO ^O25 ^OOO ^OOO ^OOO ^OOO ^OOO ^OOO ,OOO X1 7725^000 ^OOO ^OOO ,000 72,000 72.000 72,000 ,OOO .00O ,O0O X2 ^OOO ^OOO ^OOO .00O ^OOO 1.000 1 ,000 ^OOO ^OOO ^OOO X1 7735^000 15^000 50^000 179.000 10,000 100000 10,000 .00O ,000 .00O X3 100000 ^000 ^OOO ^OOO ^0OO ^OOO ^OOO 40^000 40^000 ^OOO OR 40^ 1OO ^OOO 40, 100 2O^OOO 40^000 21 ,5OO 40,000 48^OOO 40,000 50,000 OR 22^200 50^010 22^000 67000 21 ^700 ' 98.900 21 ^700 123000 22^6OO 148^900 OR 23^ 1OO 149^5OO 29.900 157^010 29,900 163000 37,4OO 174^800 40. 1O0 179,000 NC ^OOO ^OOO ^025 ^OOO ^OOO ^OOO ^OOO ^OOO ^000 ^OOO LTBRARY X1 7845^000 21 ^000 3^6OO 167,900 110.000 1000000 110^000 .00O .000 .00O X3 106000 ^OOO ^OOO ^OOO ^000 ^000 ^OOO 500000 50^000 ^OOO OR 41 ,300 ^OOO 40000 3.600 36^0OO 9^6OO 35^500 12.500 30,400 14^500 OR 29000 23^400 27^6OO 26^400 26000 31 ^400 23^900 32000 20900 41 ^400 OR 22^800 43^400 22,50O 62.400 22^ 100 88.400 21 ^400 108.400 21 ,700 124,400 OR 21000 128^400 23^000 133^400 25^600 135^400 27^200 140^400 390000 167^9OO OR 40300 185000 ^OOO ,OOO ,OOO ,OOO ^000 ^OOO ^000 ,OOO 1 04/22/87 11x41 :36 PAGE 6 SB 1050 1 ^700 3^000 ^OOO 101 ^000 6^OOO 19990000 10875 22^600 22^600 X1 8002^000 ^OOO ^OOO ,OOO 157,OOO 157,OOO 157^O00 ^000 ,000 ^O0O X2 ^000 ^OOO 1 ^000 38^6OO 50^000 ^OOO ^0OO ^000 ^OOO ^OOO X3 1O,OOO ^OOO ,000 ^OOO ,OOO ,000 .00O 50^000 50.000 .000 B7 2,OOO 0000 500000 ^OOO 185,300 50^000 ^OOO ^000 ^000 ^OOO NC ^OOO ^OOO ^03O .00O ,OOO ^OOO .00O ^OOO .0O0 ^OOO X1 8092^00� 150000 125^200 274,000 90^000 80^000 9O^000 ^OOO ^000 ^OOO OR 30000 ^OOO 32^OOO 20.000 30400 100.000 31000 122.200 31 ^900 125^200 OR 26000 128000 25.700 139^700 20200 141000 20400 161^000 22^600 184^500 CR 22,400 209,300 23,400 229,600 30000 238000 30^800 246.600 42,000 274.000 NC ^OOO ^OOO 025 ^OOO ^000 ^OOO ^OOO ^OOO ^OOO ^OOO HOUSER WAY BRIDGE X1 8402.000 150000 27,7OO 156,9OO 290,OOO 3100000 310.000 0000 .00O ,OOO X3 100000 0000 0000 ^OOO ^OOO ^OOO ^0OO 41 ^000 41 ,000 ^OOO OR 39000 ^OOO 36^300 15,400 32^ 1OO 27^700 29,900 31 .300 23,7OO 48^500 OR 21 ^800 57^900 21000 82000 22^700 102^000 23^700 114^400 24^500 120^600 CR 24000 132000 26000 137.6O0 27^500 141 ,900 36^OOO 153^4O0 39. 100 156.900 SB 1050 1000 36000 ^OOO 83^000 4^000 1270000 2^049 22000 22^80O X1 8436,000 ^OOO ,000 ^OOO 34^000 34,OOO 34,000 ,000 ,OOO ,OOO X2 ^OOO ^OOO 10000 35^000 41 .000 0000 ^OOO ,OOO ^000 ^OOO X3 100000 ^OOO .00O .00O .000 ,OOO ,OOO 41000 41 ^000 ,OOO BT 2^000 ^000 41 ^000 ^OOO 156^900 41 ^000 ^OOO ^000 ,O0O ^OOO RAILROAD BRIDGE X1 8470000 15^000 6^ 100 149, 100 40000 40.00O 40000 ,000 ,OOO +OOO CR 47^2OO ^O0O 45^500 6^ 100 37^500 18^200 33^600 25,400 23^700 40^800 ` CR 19^500 43,900 21 .700 - 70.600 22^700 92,300 23^700 OO,50O 251000 111 , 1OO ` - CR 27^7OO 12O^400 339600 131 ^000 370100 142^ 100 43000 149, 1OO 48000 173^000 NC .O50 ^04O .O35 , 1OO .3OO .000 ,OOO .000 ,OOO .000 ` I"4O5 X1 8590000 20000 69^ 1OO 230.300 160000 1OO.0OO 120^000 ,006 ,000 ,OOO CR 49^700 ^(XX) 46^200 28,40O `34^300 52^900 34^600 69^ 100 27^900 77^400 OR 20400 103^7O0 60000 103^710 60,OOO 109.7OO 25000 109,710 23.800 133^7O0 ' OR 23^400 147^900 23000 169000 ' 21 ^800 189,000 21000 196000 60000 196010 OR 60000 202^000 21000 200010 21^900 205000 24.000 213^ 1OO 32000 230.300 . OR 34000 239.600 36000 260000 36^600 288^800 ^OOO ^OOO ^OOO 000 X1 8836^00O 16,000 9,5OO 189.400 230000 230^000 240,000 .O0O ^000 .000 . CR 49^ 100 ^OOO 48^800 9^500 31 ^000 34^600 30^400 60,600 28^900 73^5OO �R 28.300 85,100 26,500 91 ^500 24,700 109,200 23.600 122^200 22^800 143^400 OR 23^500 166^600 23000 185000 34^8OO 189^400 34^700 195^600 35^200 220000 �R 36.000 280000 ,OOO ^OOO ,OOO .00O ,OOO ^000 ^OOO ^000 ^ 1 ' / ' . O4/22/87 11 x41 :36 �H6!i / - ` ^ NC 1-050 6050 ^044 1000 ^OOO ^OOO ^000 ^OOO ^OOO ^OOO 9446,000 16^000 8,400 136+800 570^O00 6504000 610^O0O .000 .00O ,OOO 51 ^000 ^000 49^800 8^400 25^800 33^500 24^600 38,00O 25^000 51 ^500 24,800 72^300 24^900 90.200 25,800 110,400 26,200 113.800 26^50O 117^800 OR 28^900 128^300 34000 130800 35^200 145000 30600 . 157^8OO' 36,0OO 160^000 Li 40.000 1901-000 .00O ,00O ^000 000 ' .00O ^000 ,OOO ,OOO NC ^000 -OOO ^400 750 ^OOO ^000 ^OOO ^000 ^OOO ADD X - BBC AT STONEWAY NO ENCROACHMENT Xl 9730000 27^000 87,OOO 204.000 310000 370,000 290000 ^OOO ^O0O 1 ^0OO OR 40400 ^000 30900 87^OOO 28^600 97^000 26^6OO 1O1 ^O0O 26000 108,000 OR 20900 120000 26000 132000 26^1OO 142,000 25000 153,000 25. 1OO 159.000 � 24^7OO 169000 24^7OO 178^000 25^400 189000 28^4OO 195000 30400 204^000 32,5O0 232^OOO � 34, 1OO 285^000 33.500 331 .O00 34000 342000 40300 380+000 CR 42000 435^000 33^OOO 430000 32^7O0 455^000 32^4OO 505000 32^OOO 545^000 v� 39,000 545^OOO 40000 567^OOO .00O ^OOO 000 .000 .000 . ^OOO 10236^000 15000 20000 178000 490^000 725^000 500000 ^OOO OOO ^OOO `. 55 300 OOO 55 OOO 2O O0O 41 8OO 34 3OO 28 7OO 48^3OO 27,900 52,5OO ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 27,500 71 ^900 27^60O 1O1 ,0OO 20700 129^300 27^400 146^6OO 28^500 151 ^000 P C 3O,50O 153.500 32. 1OO 159^OOO 33.2OO 167.200 40.2OO 178,200 40^100 193^5OO . «� ' NC ^OOO ^000 ^OOO ^ 1OO ^3OO ^OOO ^OOO 1000 ^OOO ^OOO X1 11150000 15^000 10.00O 108.700 820^000 970,000 920,OOO .000 ,OOO ,OOO �R 48^600 3^900 41 ^300 10^000 34^000 16^ 100 29^6O0 27^90O 28^400 35,200 CR 27.80O 46^900 27000 59^600 20000 . 78,200 27000 90.600 29^600 95,8OO OR 38090 108^700 39000 115000 39^ 1OO 143000 40000 157,100 40000 310000 - EJ .00O ^OOO ^OOO ,OOO ,OOO .00O ^OOO .000 ,000 .00O J. - 04/22/87 11 :41 :36 PACE 8 . SECNO DEPTH CWSEL CRIWS WSElM EGI HV HL OLOSS BAND ELEV Q Q�OB QCH (:)ROB Al.OB ACH AROB VOL TWA LEFURIGHT TIME VLOB VCH VROB XN� XNCH XNR 8�Ill N S1,311A SLOPE / XLOBL XLCH XLOBR II,RIAL IDC ICONT CORAR TOPWID ENDST ` *PROF 1 ' OTC^W OTC^ST EWE 000^306 000% 0000811 0001, O0O^C 00801 0G3^ T 8S OOO^ 0001, 000013ST 003^W.'' 0000=1 0004S3 OOO^SRVT 0O3^ T3 OOO^CUT 006'8T 8ID 000^99pT 006^9T O0O^v9vT OO8^ST 00006SVT 000001 000061VT 00VOT 000^Z3K 00POT 8o OOO^COPT OOO^ST 000^09CT 006^GT 00000GCT 0090VT 00643t'CT O03NT OOO^RCCT O0C^ZT 8� OOO^O3CT M^O3 00098TCT OOO^S3 00008TCT 0060V3 000000CT OOZ^V3 000400TT 0060T3 80 OOO^ 00S^G3 0090s3 OOO^ OOO^ OOO^ OOO^ 000^ OOO^ O0O^OT EX OOO^ 00O^ 0001, OOO^O3G 000^03S OOO^O3S OOO^Z8VT OOO^8TCT 000061 000^306C TX 3oOIH8 ONI3O8 HiOOS , OOO^ OOO^ 0001, OOO^ OOO OOC^ OOO^ 0000 0000 Al 00011 OOO^ 0000 OOO^ 0000 000^ OOO^ OOO^ 00606VT 0060M Wl 006^O3PT OOV^C3 006^OTIT OOO^C3 0060396T OOG^8T OOO^8GCT OOTNT OOO^VGCT 0060CT 8O OOO^3CCT 0096ST 0000063T 003^PT 0000993T 003^3T 00009V3T OOT ^CT 00006C3T 0090VT 8� 000^3C3T 0OV^8T 000^OC3T 0O8^8T 000^333T OOT ^O3 0004TT3T 0094O3 0004003T 00T ^O3 8� OOO^OTTT 0009O3 00O^OM O0Z^ T3 000608C 0090O3 000^0C3 OOZ^ T3 000003 OOO^S3 8� OOO^ 00000S OOO^OG OOO^ 0000 OOO^ OOO^ OOO^ OOO^ OOO^OT EX 0OO^ 0000 00O^ 000^0gR O0O^OV8 00000s8 006^39CT 00093C3T 000013 000^38CC TX OOO^ OOO^ OOO^ OOO^ OOO^ OOO^ OOO^ OOO^ 0060PTST 009^33 8� 006069VT 00T083 00606CVT O0Z^V3 00603TVT 00806T 006^ T0VT 006^6T 0060068T 00v^lT W) OOO^ T6CT OO8^3T 000099CT OOP^3T 00O^Z3CT OWCT 0064863T 00803T 000^t'Z3T 00801 8�3 0000M3T 0090VT OOS^093T OOT !6T 00008S31 O0006T 000WC3T 0O/!06T 000^003T 000003 8o 0000068 0000O3 O0O^OCZ OOv^ T3 OOO^OM 003^O3 O0O^OTC O0O^ T3 OOO^Ov OOO^s3 8� OOO^ 00O^OS 00090S 0000 0006 OOO^ OOO^ OOO^ 0000 000001 CX 000^ 000^ 00O^ 0000O36 OOO^OG6 0006036 006^ TOPT OOS^093T O0O^ T3 000^3CS3 TX OOO^ 00O^ 009096S 00106T 009^68S 0060ZT OOP^C8S 000061 OOON% O0G^O3 8 ) 00091S 008013 / 006^G6V 00608T 008^8/!V 00848T OO/!^CW 000^8T 009^O3P O0V^91 W] OOT06TP OOWCT 00s^ TTp O0O^3T O0s^sOv 00601T MOMS OOZ^ TT OOS^MC O0Z^ TT 8-) OOSMC 008^ TT OOG^SPC OOZ^ TT OOWCC OOC^ TT 00G^STC OOO^ TT 00G^GOC OOO^ TT W.) OOS^S63 OOO^ TT 00G^S83 O03^ TT 0OOC/!3 OOG^ TT 00G^993 O0C^PT OOt'^s93 00T091 8� 00V^ T93 OOV^8T OOC^OG3 006081 0080R33 009061 00040O3 00946T 0000 000^03 8�] . 000^ 0001- 00011 0O01103z 000^0 Z, 0001103Z 0091,031v 00417^ T93 000^63 000^3T9T TX 0000 00O^ 0001, OOO^ O0O^ OOC^ OOT ^ OOO^ SPO^ S�O^ opt' OOO^ 00O^ 0000 0000 O0s^zCv OOZ^8T O0V^ TCt' 0090ZT 0OT093V 008081 8!) OOs^zOv 00G^8T OOV^ZGC 000083 00TWC OOC493 00T ^C3C 009093 0004Z63 O0G^33 W.) 00S^8R3 0O3^33 0060Z3 O0G06T 0080093 OOV^ZT OOC^GG3 OOC^PT 00CM3 003^3T ' 8� OOC^Vw3 OOO^ TT 0OC^t'C3 OOV^OT 00C^M3 O0C^OT O0C^VT3 00900T OOC^VO3 O08^OT 85 O0C^V6T O08^0T 00C^V8T 00800T 00C^MT 00800T OOC^V91 O0Z^OT OOC^PST 00900T 8 ) OOC^t/VT O0G^0T OOC^VCT OOG^OT OOC^V3T OOG^0T 008^VTT OOz^OT OOC^VTT MUST A] 009^Z0T 00908T 00Z968 0OP061 OOV^U OOC46T 0060GV 0OV061 OOO^ 006^8T 8� 000^ 0001, OOO^ 0004008 000^008 00000v8 009^093 O0S^ZOT OOO^CC 000^368 TX ' 3 350J 90TWTT zR/33M) T OOO^ 000^ 000^ OOO^ O0O33 003^zC3 OOO^ OOz^33 OOO^ O0O-3 18 O0O^ OOZ^33 M^33 0000 0000 OOO^ 0001* OOO^ OOO^ OOO^OT SIX OOO^ 0000 OOO^ OOO^ ` OOO^ 001411'.^33 OOM.^8T OOO^ T OOO^ OOO^ 3X OOO^ OOO^ 000^ 000^39 0001139 000^39 OOO^ OOO^ OOO^ 000^39 TX 3oOI88 ONI3O8 HI8ON &O aN3 S/O 00669 00608 0000 OOO^=T O00^8 000009T OOO^ O0O^C OOG^ T OG3^ T 8S OOO^ OOO^ OOO^ OOO^ 000^ OO OOC OOO^ 000^ 000^ 3N OOO^ 000^ 003^Z.C3 00806T 0060061 0O3^8T O000061 O03^VT O00068T 00V06 8D OOC^ T8T 009001 0060s9T OO/!^8 O0C^ TGT 000^8 O0C^GIT 008^3 OOCMT OWN 85.] 00C^M 0OP^Z O0C^GTT 006^8 0060GOT 00006 00C^G6 OOG66 0OC^08 OWN 8� ' OOC^0Z OOE^OT OOC^ TG O0G46 O0C09t' OWN O0C^3t' OOO^ TT OOC^SC O03^VT 8.) 0060CC 0060VT O0V^OC 00V^M 008603 009^8T 008^CT 006^6T OOO^ 008661 8D OOO^ 00z1133 OOZ.^33 OOO^ OOO^ 000^ OOO^ 0004 OOO^ OOO^OT EX OOO^ 0001, 0OO^ 000^ 000^ 0OO^ 006^06T 00V11OC 000^IF3 00T11 TX ' * ype InvaIid number of parameters ` B:\>type BxCEDARNEN^OU� " 1****************************************************** ************************************** * WAT�R SUR�AC� PRO�I��S * U " / * U^S^ ARMY CORPS OF ENCINEERS if. VERSION Cll.'! NOV�MB�R 1976 it. .UPDATED MAY 1984 * * 609 SECOND * IBM-PC�Xl� V}�RSION ^ * L \� ; 0C)�� �� ����� DAVIS/ CA�I�ORNIA 95616 ���� APR /� " ����� � * RUN DATE O4/22/87 TIME 11 :41x34 * * (916) 44O-21O5 (F?�S) 448-21O5 **** * *** * ****�******* . CU{L�i��{�/��������� ���T. ~��"~~^^ ^^^ ^ IMPUT FILs« CF_t)ARMEW,Fk��° A �^���� �������� ��. - ~ KF-.XlSM Q(v coVir)rn o 0 - wo v v u- I <-- --- -' - '--- ^ � ' ' . X X XXXXXXX XXXXX XXXXX X X X X X X X X X X X X ' . XXXXXXX XXXX X XXXXX XXXXX X X X � ' X X X >� X X X X X . XXXXXXX XXXXX XXXXXXX 1 O4/22/87 11x41 :36 � � PAGM J. ��. . . THIS RUN EXECUTED 04/22/87 11 :41x38 �Nm 1--IEC2 RELEASE DATED NOV 76 UPDATED MAY 1984 ERROR CORR - 01 /02/O3/O4/O5/06 ' MODI�ICA�ION - 5O/51 /52/53/54/55/56 ' ' IBM VERSION ^ C �1 R}�N�ON �IS - S�P� 1986 - S19989,DO * ' � Y-2 RUN AT STONEWAY BY - '—`-- -' 1��� - ` - C}�DARl�IVlSR�iO(> YR FLOW J1 ICHECD INQ NI NV IDIR Sl](R� M���IC HVINS Q WS�l �Q . � O^ 2^ C. O^ ^003OOO ^OO ^O 8530^ 14,000 ^OOO ' ` J2 NPRO}, IP�O� P0PVS XS}�CV XS}�CH IB � �N AlJ�)C W ' CHNIM IVRACG -1 ^000 ^000 ^OOO ,OOO ^OOO ^OOO ^OOO ^000 ^OOO ,OOO / . J3 VARIAB�E CODMS FOR SUMMARY PRIN7OU7 > 38.00O 39,OOO 4.00O 3,O0O 42,OOO � 2.000 1 .00O 53^OOO 21 ,OOO 22,O0O . 54^OOO 5^000 ^OOO 38^0O0 16^000 17^000 18^000 43^000 13,000 14^000 15,OOO 25^0O0 26v000 27.000 28,000 ,OOO .00O ,OOO ^000 ,OOO (.�R 34,300 ^000 34, .:i00 i�Y./00 J4.800 '3'f,800 Zy,/Vo /��,/vo z�.uoo � CR 20^200 57^500 191100 74^ 100 19^200 . 101 ^900 19^700 127^900 20^OOO 149^200 Cal 24.00O 157^600 24^400 1691,700 26^200 172^500 28,600 172,51O 31 ^400 177, 100 ' CR 34^000 177^900 331.3O0 202^ 100 ^000 ^000 ^OOO ^0OO ^OOO ^OOO SB ^90O 1 �3OO 3,000 .00O 114^000 11 . 100 1296,600 1 .261 20,000 2O^O0() X1 6541 ^006 ^OOO ^OOO 11000 39^000 39^000 390000 ^000 ,OOO ^OOO X2 0000 ^OOO 1 ,OOO 31 , 1OO 34,800 ,OOO ^OOO .00O ,000 ,OOO X3 10^000 ^OOO ^OOO 1000 0000 ^OOO ^OOO 34^800 34^800 ^OOO ' BT 2^O0O ^000 34^800 ^OOO 177,900 34,8OO ^OOO ,OOO .000 ^OOO � . X1 6681 ^000 13^000 9^500 148^300 140^000 150^000 140^000 ^OOO ^OOO ^OOO [�R 31 .800 ,OOO 31 ,600 6,3OO 316300 9^500 20.6OO 180300 190700 34000 ~ OR 194400 550300 20, 100 78^300 20^600 910300 20^6OO 113^300 24^3OO 121,300 OR 24009 138.300 32.8OO 1380310 33.900 148,300 .00O .000 ,OOO ^OOO ~ ` X1 6921 ^OOO 11 ^000 100000 134^010 240^OOO 240,000 240^OOO ,OOO ^000 ^OOO OR 350900 0000 350900 100000 25000 100010 19.500 19^000 19.500 112^000 OR 24^900 120^OOO 24^900 1300000 27^400 1300010 27^400 134^OOO 36^2OO 134^010 � CR 36^200 144^000 OOO���� .00O' ,OOO .00O ,O0O ,OOO .00O ^OOO 6O 1-000 ^030 ^OOO 1800 ^OOO ^OOO ,OOO ^OOO ^000 WELLS AVENUE BRIDCM � M. 6931 ,0OO 14^OOO 100000 134,O1O 100000 100000 10.000 ^OOO 0000 ,OOO ' ^ ^^B� 14 0OO OOO 35 9OO 35^90O 1O^OOO �' 350900 350900 100010 35^9OO 30,600 �- L BIT 19,000 350900 3O^6OO 112,000 36, 1OO 30000 1170000 36^200 30^600 117,O10 ' BT 36^2OO 30^600 120^000 36^200 30^600 120^01O 36^200 32,9OO 130^O0O 36,200 B� 32,9OO 1300010 36^2OO 32.900 134,000 36^200 32,900 134.010 36^2OO 36^200 ! B� 144^000 36^200 36^200 ^OOO ^OOO ^OOO ^OOO ,OOO ^OOO ^OOO OR 350900 0000 350900 10^000 25,500 10^010 190500 19.000 19^500 112.000 [VR 22000 1170000 30o6OO 117^010 30^600 120^000 24^900 120^O1O 24^9OO 1300000 ` > ' ~ CR 27.4OO 1300010 27,400 134.000 36,200 134010 36,2OO 144,000 ,OOO .00O )<1 6973^O0O MOO ^OOO -' ^000 42^000 -42^000 42^O0O ^000 ^OOQ ^OOO X2 .O0O � ^OOO ^OOO ^O0O ^OOO .00O 1 ^000 .00O ,000 .00O .� `. NC ^000 ^OOO '^025 .00O ^OOO ^OOO ^0OO ^000 ^0OO ^OOO X1 6983.000 11 ^000 10.000 134,010 10^000 10.000 10^000 NOT ^000 ,OOO OR 35^900 ^OOO 35000 10^000 25^500 100010 190500 190000 190500 112^000 OR 24^900 120^000 24,900 130.000 27.400 1300010 27^400 134,000 36,2OO 134,010 OR 36^200 144^OOO ^OOO ^OOO ^OOO ` ^OOO ^OOO ^000 ^OOO ^OOO NC ,OOO ,OOO ' ,000 ^ 1OO .400 ,OOO 4000 .00O ^OOO ,000 M. 71O3^ 17^OOO 16^3OO l6O,91O 12O^OOO � 130^000 12O^000 ^OOO 0000 ^OOO � � (�o --� ^(X}(7 - 3�T460O - ' 16�3OC/ ' 27�3OO- --'29;900 -' - 26,800 ' ''- =900, — - 26.70() -�-41 ;400' -''-- OR 21 ^70O 45^7<X) 20000 590900 20^9OO 98^900 20^600 1250900 20^800 142^900 OR 21 ^600 145^9OO 25^000 150,900 25^400 160,900 27^900 160,910 27.600 164,9O0 ' OR 330500 164^910 34, 1OO 180^800 ^OOO ^OOO ^OOO ^OOO ^OOO ^OOO 1 04/22/87 11 :41 :36 PACE 5 , ' . NC '^OOO ^OOO ^020 ^000 ^OOO ^000 ~ . ^OOO ^OOO ^OOO ^OOO ` M. 7483^O0O 17^000 22.500 165,000 370,000 38O,A O 38O.O00 .00O ,000 .00O ^ . - �R 37^60O ^OOO 36^4OO 17 OO 35^OOO � . 22^5OO �9^3OO 27^9OO 22^4OO 37,O0O OR 21 ^6OO 380000 21 ^8OO 52^800 21 ,700 859700 21 ,300 113.600 21 ,4OO 133.600 OR 22^ 100 136,600 25.900 141 ^70O 26^200 . 151 ^7O0 28^600 151 ^710 28^500 1556000 OR 34000 155^010 37,20O 165.00O ,OOO .00O .00O ^OOO .00O .00O ` ' NC ^000 ^OOO ^028 ^OOO ^500 0000 � ^OOO ^OOO 11000 ^OOO M. 7643,OOO 13^000 50^000 179,0OO 166.000 170.000 ' 16O,OOO .00O .00O ,OOO X3 . 100000 ^OOO ^OOO ,000 ^OOO ,0OO ,O0O 40^000 40^000 ,OOO OR 40^ 100 ^OOO 40^ 100 20,000 40.000 21 ^500 22,7OO 48^000 22,200 '504000 '- CR' 22^0OO 67^800 21 ^700 980900 21 ^7O0 123^800 22^600 148^900 23^ 10O 149^500 X2 +O0O ^OOO 1 ^OOO 21 ,8OO 25,5OO .00O ,OOO .000 ^OOO .0OO OOO 0OO OOO 25 OOO 25 000 OOO ) X3 1O^O0O ^O0O ^OOO ^OOO ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ _ BT 7^000 ' 1100^000 21 ,300 ,OOO 1300.000 24.700 .00O 1313.00O 24^900 _ ^OOO � 1311, 1318^000 25^000 ^OOO 1402^500 25,5OO ,OOO 1487^000 25^000 ^OOO 1521 ^000 , BT 24.200 ,OOO .00O .00O ^000 .00O ,OOO ,OOO ,OOO ^OOO ' 1 . ' 04/22/87 11x41:36 � � PAGE3 ' ' ) _ . l' NC 1000 ^O<X) ^OOO ^OOO 11800 !OOO ^OOO 4.01,00 ^OOO 1-000 M. 4114^000 30,000 1432, 1OO 1567,3OO 15O^OOO 15O^OOO 15O,OOO � 0000 ,000 ,OOO X3 10^060 4-000 ,OOO ^OOO ^OOO 000 5O^000 50^000 ^000 CR� 300000 63^OOO 25^ON) 70.000 22,30O 270+000 23,3O0 �4O5.00O 23^OOO 68O,O00 ' CR 2O^4OO 14O0^OOO 19^8OO 1425,9OO 1/l^2OO 1432,1OO 16^OOO 1434^OOO 14^5OO 1437.4OO ` [�R 15,8OO 1447^8OO 15.7OO 1475. 1OO 15,6OO 1495^8OO 15,0OO 153O^4O0 14,900 1555^8OO ^ CR 16^ 1OO 1559^ 1OO - 22,3OO 1567^3OO 23^3OO 1585,6OO 24^8OO 1618^7O0 25^5OO 1623^2O0 . �R� ` 25.8OO 1626^2OO 25^6O0 16�2�OOO 26^2OO � 1773.O0O 26^5OO 19O5^7OO 27,OOO 2029^9OO G'R 27^300 2127^200 26^600 2158^500 26^600 2270^000 26^700 2390,000 26^900. 2520^900 ' 3OO DO OOONC �0OO OOO O25 1OO ^ M. 4654^OOO 33�^OOO 1492^3OO 1624^6OO 54O^OOO '�4O^OOO 54O^OOO ^0OO ,OOO ^OOO ` r ' X3 10.000 ,OOO ,OOO ^000 4000 .00O .00O 50^000 500000 ,OOO CR 30^000 20^000 25,OOO 30^OOO 23^600' .210^000 25^000 5300000 25^700 ' 630^000 CR 25,OOO 710^000 24, 10O 840.000 24.6OO 10904000 24,400 13000000 23.9OO 1356.3OO CR 23^300 1433^ 100 22^600 1445^500 22^000 1447^900 22^6OO 1451 ^OOO 22^6OO 1471 ^500 CR 22. 100 14874.300 21 .700 1492,3OO 17^ O 1496,300 15,600 15OO,500 16.100 1517.300 CR 16^300 1549^ 100 16^5OO 1579 . 00O 17^ O 16O2^ O ' 17^3OO 1611 ^6OO 19^2OO 1621 ,7OO ' ' / CR 21 .8OO 1624.600 26,4OO 1659^800 26,900 1673.700 27,500 ' 1681 .000 26.000 1693,3OO [�R 26,7O � 17O1 ^OOO 27,OOO 1752^4OO � 27^5OO 18O3^8OO ,OOO ^OOO ^OOO . ^000 ` / M. 5244^OOO 23^OOO 248,30O 38O^9O0 � 62O^OOO 55O.00O 590,OOO � .O0O ,OOO ,OOO X3 10^000 ^OOO ^OOO ,000 ^000 .00O ^OOO 500000 50^000 '' 1000 CR 28, 100 ^OOO 28,200' 50,.200 27,4O0 114, 100 26^000 162.200 24,900 206A00 , CR 24^7OO 226^200 23^5OO 243^800 23^600 248^300 17^9OO 254^400 16^500 258.000 . CR 16^40O 272^200 17,000 290.500 17^400 306,500 17,900 320,200 18^300 366,900 �R 22 4O ' 380 9OO 23 4OO 396 1OO 27,9OO 424^3OO 28^6OO 448^2OO 29^ 1OO 454.4OO ^ v ^ ^ ^ \ CR 27.400 467^700 27^200 528.20O 28,0OO 84O,0OO .00O ,OOO .000 ^000 ' , . NC ^OOO 000 0000 1-500 ^OOO ^000 ^OOO ^000 � ^000 , l.00AN AVENUE BRTD�E M. 5644,O0O 12^OOO 34,OOO � 186,OOO 41O,OOO 4OO,OOO 4OO.00O � .00O ,OOO - 1000 ` X3 100000 ^OOO ^OOV ^000 ^OOO ^000 ^O0O 32^4OO � � 32^400 ^OOO � CR 27^300 ,OOO 26^ 100 34,000 _ 18^700 48.00O 17,5OO' 53.000 17^600 68,000 CR 17^8OO 98^000 18^4OO 1301000 18^600 157^000 22^300 '71 �000 24^900 . 186^000 [*IC R 27.20O. 192^400 32^200 192,50O .00O .00O _ +OOO .000 ,O0O �000 , ' ' SB 1 ^25O 2'OOO ' 3^OOO ' ^OOO 17O^OOO ' 3^5O0 1243^OOO ^OOO ' ' 19^4O0 19~40O M. 5762,0OO .000 ' .00O .000 118^000 11811000 ' 118.000 .00O 0000 ,OOO X2 ,000 ^O0O 1 ^000 26.9OO 32^400 � ^800 1000 ,000 0-000 ,VVV ` X3 ' 1O,OOO ^000 ^OOO ,0OO ^O0O .00O ^0OO �� 32.40O 32,40O ^OOO . B� 2 OOO 0OO 32^4OO ^OOO 192^5OO 32^40O ^OOO ,000 ^OOO ^OOO ^ ^ � . .' � M. 6O12,OOO 17^0OO 26.00O 167,OOO 25O,OOO 25O,OOO 25O,0OO ^OOO ^OOO ^000 - CR 29^ 100 ^0OO 28,8OO � 26^000 20^400 36^000 19^500, 46^000. 19^ 100 66^OOO CR 18.9O0 90^000 18. 1OO 121 ,OOO 18,6OO 138.00O 19.5OO 14O^O0O 22^5OO 146,OOO CR 22^800 156 000 25^2OO 156,O10 25^3OO � ' 159,0OO � 29,8OO 167^OOO 3O,6OO 181 ^OOO ' CR 31 .5OO 191 ^O00 32.5OO 226,OOO OOO �OOO .0OO .0OO �OOO ,OOO , , ' 1 - 04/22/87 114-41 :36 ' � PAC� 4 ' -` . - WI��IAMS AVEI-41M � M. 6502,000 17^000 34,800 177.900 500.000 480.000 49011000 000 0OOO ,000 ' CITY OF RENTON 200 MILL AVENUE SOUTH RENTON, WA 98055 206-235-2501 FAX# 235-2513 DATE OG� 7 '7 l _ PAGES (EXCLUDING THIS COVER SHEET) ATTENTION: 4tJ/r/4- 65T- FROM: / c) Y(3E , CITY OOFRE,\ 1v.a OCT. 10 1989 ECEGII ( ) , S�77( .LP1 >y/v/" ,7.j 'f),' J- 1}6(P')3 32./S 9Z • •.� `t �cy •rr}ot T+ r1 r �1. c ‘ ..,Lr'''<f� 6.U"'� ''':',Pt K 9S Ye s �yt � 4 -. ` "'! • f �/A �vJ"/��_//i F 2 .' ..!?1 ,,� A, //�/cs� '� ' t1� { 1� a t� ?$ l ,4. t` tj tiar`_ q Y j-s# a � �J�J S��'f ,la + � , - `cyr; . ..x !:4•- .. its + ! ,,.< , —t _ ..- 7„_. ,, r ► , V., r r , ., _ ,: ., cis...4..,..."...".zo. .• h -.-4...'''.. -t-r. .t.•i',718/,,Y{..,'„. tok..., . ,. ...... . -k - '''.- - ;" ' . . .. ... 1. • s ' ►� i '' ti t : f y`t"'i i �;•- r.-'.1�' rrJ�'.. v y• il. 4. • ...i. 0�, a ril -4.•_.j +... - ;, . • �. v �.'"' is ''" "c` 'r^�=; `4" 4 . M { -.-_---..,-.....______,_, •'• 1‘ ,., L. :,.,_ - ,,k,_.. '" ' -_ ', s6. r p,, .t..i r. .�_ --- - - _ '47 "- _ . r **....1lial',.; „,,I iliaLl I tliiii.1,4...: 1\7,. .... • • e. ,7 .• •{.� 'S P-; � • 4, yCYi i .t.:. ':7;:: 1 • $ 'T1f�---.�•.�-.yam .. •; J.xv' <I„" ' :� ter+ 2:�•� �� yy)� I.~ j r,ro .+,7�"' Y • i ,•�,�.• • n�._ _.. 'fit`.' ♦ _ .'4`J _•�,• el '' A• F �? Ua ,�/f� IFF r�.. .+.'^ �`j .i ': ..'L /, i✓•�• . � s .14,. -<y� ..- �'�,. fr�Ql��• {', s�" J �( r'.p» Y> 4 K a' � ' �y ! skt KN` ' ; y rF _ ;`,. P ri y �a:'+� ' t<� „() \ ((/ n _ I" x X '4'r'.3::r74;,• iF=i 1N i.,. .-�, �•r�� `'`-lad- `4 ` - .+it� t - �� r. .._r. , isriY .�.. �1` I 1.'f-� ` 1 '�� i!•ro a �1� .` r `='0-€.','�1.,%. A 1, )' ' - '.Z.'y' -..".,.'Ilk 1/.31,7 /111j f Y (.\_, ,, ill 14 r'9 1 ,, i ,441/./7";,,a of 5 /)' -Z iiii-j<I I he' ,‘, # ij ilr ii)/711 41 � '",;'%�'�".,- „`•X - 6v,.r' '„ , fix. ,. k.. -a, „ 1 / :4-e...) j f�a'w�s..r° - * �• `fir_ "'�, .s.•4 "� ;2".` .. �J l'(J� 0 /4 rig LV l iYIL1VI .., ft /iIr-UVIVI . To Date 1( 'a lel From - Sub ject 0..-av‘cM — \ _ - • 'cs� • `�' POSE �-:\.�.. C�-\›...Q-:mod 4— '4---•__ , '--%. / • - 4)---.. te_k- k�12� t�`:Lt_� TSB, � • e.: T . • Q.t. r_• . "....„. i . • f Sr - ,,,,, „,.., . . . • / ,,, ..,..... • ,....,.. .. .....:: _ ... / • . . . . _ ••• •_• , „, • .- . : :., • . ,, .. . . 7. . _.:„..., , • ..,, ._. . . . _ _ .,, . , • .,., .. .... ., ____...„ ,i• _. ,.........., , ,, . • .. . .:..„, . . . . . :r� .... r . 44% ® CITY OF RENTON saLL POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor MEMORANDUM DATE: October 5, 1988 TO: File FROM: Jerry Lind, Planning Division SUBJECT: Stoneway Concrete fill and grade permit File: SP-005-87 • A decision was made today regarding the requirement of Stoneway Concrete's fill and grade permit to provide a six foot high berm on the common property line of Cedar River Park. Nancy Mathews, Chairman of the Planning and Development Committee, decided that the requirement to provide the berm would not be necessary because the Parks and Recreation Department has the discretion to determine the final height of the berm. The Parks Department does not want the ground level in the landscaped area higher than that of the proposed fill area of Stoneway Concrete. The Parks Department has also determined that the proposed landscaping to supplement the existing park landscaping is sufficient. cc: Parks and Recreation Department ifl stoneway • ``61,200 Mill Avenue'South Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2552 • • NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RFNTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON,WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION HELD BY HEARING EXAMINER HAREHIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND A ua r e y 3 e n n e r ,being first duly sworn on oath states FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON AUGUST 23, that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the 1988, AT 9:00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: KBI DIVERSIFIED, LTD., THE RENTON VALLEY DAILY NEWS RIDGE APARTMENTS Applications to rezone 1.4 acres of prop- • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition erty from R-1 Residential single-family to R-3 residential multi-family and for site plan Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week.That said newspapers approval to allow a 108 unit apartment complex on a 5.74 acre property (1.4 acre are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six site combined with 4.34 acre parcel zoned months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published R-4, residential multiple family). Property is located on the west side of Aberdeen Ave- in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King nue N.E., between 873-1021 Aberdeen County,Washington.The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal Avenue N.E. ECF-005-88; R-005-88; SA- -88 newspaper order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for Oo CITY by P g CITY OF RENTON RESERVOIR King County. Applications to: a) rezone approximately two acres of property from R-1, Residential Use, to P-1, Public Use; and b) site plan The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the Kent Edition approval to allow the construction of a , Renton Edition X , Auburn Edition , (and not in water storage tank(approximately 1 million gallon tank) together with a 16 inch water supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers service pipeline and adjacent roadway.The during the below stated period.The annexed notice a reservoir will be located on Carr Road,east of Valley Medical Center and south of the Soisic3 of Public Hearing Covenant Church Building. The watermain will be installed in Carr Road from Valley was published on A u gts At 12 , 1988 R.3101 Medical Center to 103rd Place S.E. and up the reservoir access road (143rd Place S.E.)ECF-021-88, R-021-88,SA-021-88. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Building The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the and Zoning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID sum of $ 3 H 4 it . PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRE- SENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON AUGUST 23, 1988, AT 9:00 A.M. TO 'LG EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. r /�" T Published in the Valley Daily News ` August 12, 1988.R3101.Acct.#51067. Subscribed and sworn to before m his 25 tk day of August 1983 Notar ublic for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, King County, Washington. VDN#87 Revised 11/86 • PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT TO: Renton City Council Members FROM: Planning and Development Committee RE: Stoneway Concrete , Inc , SP-005-87 City of Renton Parks Department The Planning and Development Committee convened work sessions on February 11, 1988 , February 18, 1988 , February 25, 1988 , and March 10 , 1988 , to consider the appeal of Stoneway Concrete, Inc. (Stoneway) . Stoneway appeals the decision of the Hearing Examiner dated December 11, 1987 On behalf of Stoneway , attorney David Halinen appeared and waived any requirement that the work sessions be recorded . The Stoneway property is located south of Maple Valley Highway and north of the Cedar River at 1915 Maple Valley Highway. Stoneway applied for a special permit to fill and grade approximately 53 , 000 cubic yards of fill material . The fill is to be located within 200 feet of the Cedar River . A portion of the fill will occur on City property at Cedar River Park . After consideration of the file and the arguments raised by the applicant, the Committee finds that the Hearing Examiner committed a substantial error of fact in that he failed to consider the historical use of the site . Therefore , the Committee recommends that the Council reverse the decision of the Hearing Examiner and impose certain conditions upon the applicant, Stoneway Concrete ,Inc. Those conditions should include : 1 ) this approval is subject to State approval pursuant to the Shoreline Management Act RCW 90 . 58; 2 ) any and all activity involved in this grade and fill must comply with the City' s Shoreline Management Plan; and 3 ) no expansion, enlargement, or change in location of any historical uses, within the Shoreline District unless allowed by the SMP, SMA, or WAC provisions; 4 ) the conditions of the Environmental Review Committee must be followed: a) Haul routes and hours of operation to be approved by Public Works , Policy Development, Parks and Recreation, and the State Department of Transportation; b) All fill materials to be certified as to their cleanliness by a certified professional engineer ; c) Hours of filling are to be coordinated with, the Parks and Recreation Department; d) A landscape®erosion buffer easement having a minimum width of 30 feet from the mean water level of the Cedar River and a northern setback distance determined by the drip line of existing trees along the river ' s edge and running the full width of the western portion of the site from the western boundary (abutting Cedar River Park) east to the existing sedimentation pond is to be provided to visually screen the industrial uses on the site from recreational uses along the Cedar River as well as to create an erosion buffer from Cedar River flooding; e) Because of the fragile natural environment of the landscape buffer, fill materials shall be retained by earthern berms beginning behind the landscape buffer; NOTE: If ecology blocks are used as a retention device for the proposed fill, they shall be bermed along their river side and shall be setback a minimum distance of 15 feet from the landscaped buffer easement identified in item 4 . above. f) All bermed areas shall be landscaped with evergreen trees and plants as well as soil retained evergreen ground cover; and g) Additional conifer and evergreen shrubbery shall be planted in the landscape®erosion buffer. easement for erosion control as well as to create an aesthetic visual screen of heavy industrial uses on the site. 5 ) Applicant shall plant mature trees and densely landscape in the landscape buffers which are being required adjacent to the Park Property; 6 ) Applicant must still obtain site plan ' approval , at which time applicant must provide specific evidence of the ,historical uses and locations thereof; 7 ) The fill and landscaping which has been required adjacent to the Park, is subject to Park Department approval; 8 ) Applicant shall install a fence consistent with staff' s prior requirements. 9 ) Applicant shall construct an earthern berm on that portion of the site which is contiguous with the eastern edge of the Cedar River Park . This berm shall extend , as necessary, onto the west side of the Stoneway property. Said berm shall be six feet in height above the proposed grade along the property boundary as shown on the grading plan. • 10 ) If covenants are necessary, to insure historical use only, those will be proposed before site plan approval. For purposes of these conditions, Shoreline District shall mean that 200 foot strip parallel to the right bank of Cedar River along applicant' s site. The Committee recommends that the Council reverse the Hearing Examiner and approve the fill and grade permit with the above conditions. Dated: March , 1988 . Nancy Mathews Richard Stredicke John Reed CITY5 : 08/3/9/88 ( i tlG 11111 11111 • April 5, 1988 VYZIS ALBERT KLANN CONTRACT ADMINISTRATOR Ms. Jeanette Samek-McKague City of Renton VYZIS COMPANY Municipal Building 3605 132nd Ave.S.E.,Ste.300 200 Mill Avenue South Bellevue,WA 98006-1323 - Renton, WA (206)643-4300 1-800-922-9311 FAX:643-7215 RE: Vyzis Company, Southgate Office Plaza Dear Ms. Samek McKague: We have reviewed the issues discussed at the March 24th 1988 meeting with yourself and Donald Erickson regarding the 100 year flood level and its effect on the subject site. As a result we would like to request that we be allowed to modify our _filling and grading permit application. Since we are now aware of the flood plain issues which are being discussed in the Renton area we would like to modify our application to make it more compatible with existing conditions. The modifications we propose are as follows: A) The filling and grading permit as submitted was for the remaining three phases of the project, and includes some flood plain areas. We propose to reduce the permit to cover only Phase II of this project, which has a minimal amount flood plain area, and a limited amount of grading on the Phase III and IV portion of the site. The grading in Phase III and IV would only be above the flood plain area and for the purpose of eliminating standing water on the site. B) The filling and grading plan would be revised to reflect one of the two following scenarios, which would result in no loss of flood plain storage, and would remain in effect until the City of Renton has resolved the flood control measures in the valley with the Department of Ecology (approximately 1 year) . 1. Parking lots would be placed in the flood plain area at an elevation equal to or lower than existing, in order that no storage will be lost. VYZIS COMPANY 3605 132nd Ave.S.E./Suite 300/Bellevue,WA 98006-1323/(206)643-4300 1-800-922-9311 2. The area within flood plain would be a landscaped reserve for parking in accordance with Ordinance No. 4-2208; thereby eliminating any effect on the flood plain volume. We hope you will consider these issues and allow a modification to our application. If you have any questions, please contact us. Sincerely yours Albert F. K Project Administrator Vyzis Company LJS/AK AK:vp • VYZIS COMPANY 3605 132nd Ave.S.E./Suite 300/ Bellevue,WA 98006-1323/(206)643-4300 1-800-922-9311 ,,___ fi: k----ijoy STONEWAY • RENTON • TUKWILA CONCRETE • SEATTLE ACCOUNTING:9125 10TH AVENUE SOUTH • SEATTLE,WA 98108 • (206)762-2566 SALES: 1915 MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY • RENTON,WA 98055 • (206)226-1000 C I S/ o4= EIiPTON r ,.._.., c7EnvE ihi April 4, 1988 UIBLDrr �G/ZOI IIl,G DEPT Mr. Donald Erickson Zoning Administrator City of Renton Building and Zoning Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Re: Renton Batch Plant Site • Gravel Filter Birm Along Edge of Site Dear Mr. Erickson: Our attorney David Halinen reported to us this morning that you had expressed concern about gravel that has been placed along the edge of the material stock-piling area along a portion of the Cedar River. That gravel was placed to act as a filter for any site-laden storm water runoff draining from that portion of the site. It was not intended to be any part of the permanent filling of the site. If you need any further claification, please feel free to phone me. Sincerely, STONEWAY CONCRETE Gary M rlino GM:j ao y"V1N w SP- 066 -87 •, 4 CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director • March 30, 1988 Stoneway Concrete • 1915 Maple Valley Hy Renton, WA 98055 Attn: Anita West Dear Ms.. West: Thank you for your letter dated March 24, 1988. I am attaching a copy of the City Council Minutes of March 21st for your convenience. As you can see, they are supportive of the historical use of the property. They have also listed a number of conditions. I believe you should do the following: 1. Obtain your annual Grading License. 2 . Obtain your Shoreline Permit. 3 . Make sure the requirements listed by the Council are part of your proposed process.. After that process is accomplished, the operation you are& proposing will have the necessary approvals to proceed. Sincerely, • • onald G. Nelson . Building & Zoning Director RGN:plp . stonwylt cc: Larry Warren, City Attorney • Donald Erickson, Zoning Administrator ✓ • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 • RENTON STONEWA. _ • TUKWILA s,..,..� CONCRETE • • SEATTLE ACCOUNTING:9125 10TH AVENUE SOUTH • SEATTLE,WA 98108 • (206)762-2566 SALES: 1915 MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY • RENTON,WA 98055 • (206)226-1000 CITY OF RENTON ( c � FF1V 1E7,1 March 24, 1988 kf 28l988 Ron Nelson BUILDING /ZONING DEPT. City of Renton Building & Zoning Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Dear Mr. Nelson: On March 16, 1988 you wrote a letter in concern of our filling our property 'at 1916 Maple Valley Road prior to a fill permit being issued. ' I want to assure you we are not filling the property. We are using this area as a staging location for material that is hauled in by City of Seattle and miscellaneous small contractors that cannot afford the extra time to haul out of town. Then we backhaul this material to our pit site when trucks are available. • We appreciate your time and understanding with this situation. Sincerely, Anita West Vice President AW:j ao' • CERTIFIED MAIL #115603 March 16, 1988 Anita West,. Vice President Stoneway Concrete 9125 10th S Seattle, WA 98108 Dear Ms. West: It has been brought to my attention that fill material is being placed on your property adjacent to your Maple Valley plant at 1915 Maple Valley Highway (see attached map for location) . This is the same location in which your fill permit was denied and has subsequently been appealed to the City Council. I understand that the Council remanded it back to the Hearing Examiner. However, the fact remains that you do not have the necessary permit, therefore, you must cease that operation until such time that the necessary permit have been obtained. Sincerely, Ronald G. Nelson Building & Zoning Director RGN:plp stonwylt cc: Larry Warren, City• Attorney David Halinen, P.E. ,J.D. • %• : < ' CITY OF RENTON FINANCE DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk March 25, 1988 • Mr. David L. Halinen Attorney at Law 3015-112th Avenue NE, Suite 203 Bellevue, WA 98004 Re: Appeal of Stoneway Concrete, Inc. and the City of Renton Parks Department for Special Permit, File No. SP-005-87 Dear Mr. Halinen: At its regular meeting of March 21, 1988, the Renton City Council adopted the recommendation presented by the Planning and Development Committee regarding the referenced appeal. A copy of the Committee recommendation is attached for your information. If you require further assistance regarding this matter, please feel free to call. Sincerely, CITY OF RENTON Marilyn . ersen Deputy ity Clerk cc: Mayor Council President Building & Zoning Department Hearing Examiner Enclosure • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2501 STONEWAY • RENTON • TUKWILA CONCRETE . SEATTLE ACCOUNTING:9125 10TH AVENUE SOUTH • SEATTLE,WA 98108 • (206)762-2566 SALES: 1915 MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY • RENTON,WA 98055 • (206)226-1000 CITY OF RENTON 1-i.- frC [FOM ( )\ March 24, 1988 MAR 2 81988 ji Ron Nelson BUILDING /ZONING DEPT. City of Renton Building & Zoning Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Dear Mr. Nelson: On March 16, 1988 you wrote a letter in concern of .our._filling our property at 1916 Maple Valley Road prior to a fill permit being issued. I want to assure you we are not filling the property. We are using this area as a staging location for material that is hauled in by City of Seattle and miscellaneous small contractors that cannot afford the extra time to haul out of town. Then we backhaul this material to our pit site when trucks are available. We appreciate your time and understanding with this situation. Sincerely, Anita West Vice President AW:j ao "March 21. 1988 . - Renton City Council Minutes - Page 87 investigated the property and ruled that if public sewer is available to the property, connection must be made at this time. Public Works Director Houghton recommended approval of non-standard connection to the City's sanitary sewer system conditioned upon execution of a covenant to annex; execution of temporary service agreement to participate in any future LID for extension of the sewer main in Cedar Avenue South; payment of permit fees; and installation of side sewer by contractor licensed and bonded in City of Renton; Upon Council inquiry, Mr. Houghton reported that utility rates outside City limits are one and one-half times that of in-City rates, and Mr. Cantellay would be billed at the higher rate. MOVED BY HUGHES, SECONDED BY KEOLKER WHEELER, COUNCIL CONCUR WITH RECOMMENDATION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR AND ALLOW MR. CANTELLAY TO CONNECT TO CITY SEWERS WITH CONDITIONS AS STATED. CARRIED. OLD BUSINESS Council President Keolker Wheeler presented a Committee of the Whole Committee of the Whole report indicating that the City Council met in workshop session on Monday, March 14, 1988, to discuss two items of proposed legislation and one technical study. • Fire: Underground Tank 1. Secondary Containment Ordinance (referred 2/8/88): The Committee of Secondary Containment the Whole recommended that the proposed Underground Ordinance Storage/Secondary Containment Ordinance be approved as amended and referred to the Ways and Means Committee for preparation of final legislation. In addition, those parties of record who have testified on this issue should be notified that legislation has been prepared and copies of the ordinance should be made available. The final draft of the Secondary Containment Ordinance should include language requiring the installation of secondary containment systems within 18 months from the adoption of the ordinance for any business operating within the zone one Aquifer Protection Area (APA). Utility: Well Field 2. Aquifer Protection Area Ordinance (referred 2/8/88): The Council Protection Study (Aquifer should adopt the well field monitoring study dated March 1988, as a Protection Area technical document which contains data and information that shall serve Ordinance) as the factual basis for the proposed aquifer protection ordinance. Specifically, the study defines the impact zones and the area contained in the City's Cedar River well field. After hearing a description and analysis of the proposed aquifer protection ordinance, the Committee recommended that staff proceed with the environmental and public review process. MOVED BY KEOLKER WHEELER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE REPORT. CARRIED. City of Renton Public Responding to Councilman Stredicke's inquiry, Mayor Clymer advised that Hearing Notices procedures for removal of public hearing notices will be researched. Planning and Planning and Development Committee Chairman Mathews presented a report Development Committee indicating that the Committee had met on 2/11/88, 2/18/88, 2/25/88 and Appeal: Stoneway : 3/10/88 to consider the appeal of Stoneway Concrete, Inc. (Stoneway). Concrete Inc. and Parks Stoneway appeals the decision of the Hearing Examiner dated 12/11/87. On Department Special behalf of Stoneway, attorney David Halinen appeared and waived any Permit, SP-005-87 requirement that the work sessions be recorded. The Stoneway property is located south of Maple Valley Highway and north of the Cedar River at 1915 Maple Valley Highway. Stoneway applied for a special permit to fill and grade approximately 53,000 cubic yards of fill material. The fill is in part to be located within 200 feet of the Cedar River. A portion of the fill will occur on City property at Cedar River Park. After consideration of the file and the arguments raised by the applicant, the Committee finds that the Hearing Examiner committed a substantial error of fact in thlt-hegfailed to consider the historical use of the site. Therefore, the Committee recommended that the Council reverse the decision of the Hearing Examiner and impose certain conditions upon the applicant, Stoneway Concrete, Inc. Those conditions should include: 1. This approval is subject to State approval pursuant to the Shoreline Management Act, RCW 90.58; March 21. 1988 Renton City Council Minutes Page 88 2. Any and all activity involved in this grade and fill must comply with the City's Shoreline Management Plan; • 3. No expansion, enlargement, or change in location of any-historical uses, within the Shoreline District unless allowed by the SMP, SMA, or WAC provisions; 4. The conditions of the Environmental Review Committee must be followed: a. Haul routes and hours of operation to be approved by the Public Works, Policy Development, and Parks and Recreation Departments of the City of Renton, and the State Department of Transportation; b. All fill materials to be certified as to their cleanliness by a certified professional engineer; c. Hours of filling are to be coordinated with the Parks and Recreation Department; d. A landscape erosion buffer easement having a minimum width of 30 feet from the mean water level of the Cedar River and a northern setback distance determined by the drip line of existing trees along the river's edge and running the full width of the western portion of the site from the western boundary (abutting Cedar River Park) j east to the existing sedimentation pond is to be provided to visually screen the industrial uses on the site from recreational uses along the Cedar River as well as to create an erosion buffer from Cedar River flooding; e. Because of the fragile natural environment of the landscape buffer, fill materials shall be retained by earthen berms beginning behind the landscape buffer; NOTE: If ecology blocks are used as a retention device for the proposed fill, they shall be bermed along their river side and shall be set back a minimum distance of 15 feet from the landscaped buffer easement identified in Item 4 above. f. All bermed areas shall be landscaped with evergreen trees and plants as well as soil retained evergreen ground cover; and g. Additional conifer and evergreen shrubbery shall be planted in the landscape erosion buffer easement for erosion control as well as to create an aesthetic visual screen of heavy industrial uses on the site. 5. Applicant shall plant mature trees and densely landscape in the landscape buffers which are being required adjacent to the park property; 6. Applicant must still obtain site plan approval, at which time applicant must provide specific evidence of the historical uses and locations thereof; 7. Applicant shall fill and provide a landscape erosion buffer, as required in 4d above, along the Cedar River shore, along applicant's side, AND ail' additional thirty feet to the west of applicant's (Stoneway's) western property line. ' 8. The fill and landscaping which has been required adjacent to the-park is subject to Park Department approval; 9. Applicant shall install a fence consistent with staffs prior requirements. Additionally, applicant shall install a similar fence along the thirty feet immediately to the west of its western boundary, along the Cedar River. Additionally, applicant shall install a fence along the top of the berm, on or near the boundary line, between Stoneway and the Cedar River Park. "March 21. 1988 Renton City Council Minutes Page 89 10. Applicant can construct an earthen berm on that portion of the site which is contiguous with the eastern edge of the Cedar River Park. This berm shall extend, as necessary, onto the west side of the Stoneway property. Said berm shall be six feet in height above the proposed grade along the property boundary as shown on the grading plan. The location of the berm and the fence shall be subject to agreement between applicant and the Park Department. 11. If covenants are necessary to ensure historical use only, those will be proposed before site plan approval. For purposes of these conditions, Shoreline District shall mean that 200-foot strip parallel to the right bank of the Cedar River along applicant's site. The Committee recommended that the Council reverse the Hearing Examiner and approve the fill and grade permit with the above conditions. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT.* Responding to Council concern regarding proper use of riverfront property, Councilwoman Mathews advised intent of the report that Stoneway would be allowed to fill if they received State and Shoreline Management approval, but would not be able to use any of the filled property until the City issues site plan approval. She noted that there are historic uses to the property which Stoneway has the right to continue, and those uses will be determined during site plan review. Stoneway cannot expand the industrial use that has been there over past years, but they can improve the shoreline if all approvals are obtained. *MOTION CARRIED. In response to Council inquiry, David Halinen, attorney for Stoneway, 3015 112th Avenue NE, Suite 203, Bellevue, advised that he has received material regarding the Council's mission statement requesting Stoneway to join the City in partnership to try and make further improvements along the riverbank whenever possible, but has not yet reviewed them with the applicant. Transportation Transportation Committee Chairman Nelson presented a report concurring in Committee the staff recommendation to approve the assignment of Fancher Flyways, Inc. Lease: Fancher to Leven, Municipal Hangar X-33-A (Office) and X-33-C (Hangar) to Bruce J. Leven. RLAG-01-81 Lease: Leven, LAG-001- Transportation Committee Chairman Nelson presented a report concurring in 88 the staff recommendation to approve the request from Mr. Bruce J. Leven to standardize ground lease termination dates to a common date of December 31, 2019. Airport: Hangar Rental Transportation Committee Chairman Nelson presented a report concurring in Rates the staff recommendation to defer a decision about increasing municipal hangar rental rates until receipt of an "Appraisal of Airport Properties" report is forthcoming. Airport: Hangar Lease Transportation Committee Chairman Nelson presented a report concurring in Procedure the staff recommendation that the City retain its current procedure for leasing space in the City-owned hangar. MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE TRANSPORTATION (AVIATION) COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS. CARRIED. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways and Means Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke presented a report Committee recommending the following ordinances for second and final reading: Ordinance #4141 An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of property located Rezone: Honey Creek, in the vicinity of the 2200 block of Jefferson Avenue NE from General R-014-84 Classification District (G-1) to single family residential district (R-1) and low density multifamily residential district (R-2) and General Classification District (G-1) for Honey Creek Associates, R-014-84. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL ADOPT ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. t. PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT TO: Renton City Council Members FROM: Planning and Development Committee RE: Stoneway Concrete, Inc, SP-005-87 City of Renton Parks Department The Planning and Development Committee convened work sessions on February 11, ' 1988, February 18, 1988, February 25, 1988, and March 10, 1988, to consider the appeal of Stoneway Concrete, Inc. (Stoneway) . Stoneway appeals the decision of the Hearing Examiner dated December 11, 1987 On behalf of Stoneway, attorney David Halinen appeared and waived any requirement that the work sessions be recorded. The Stoneway property is located south of Maple Valley Highway and north of the Cedar River at 1915 Maple Valley Highway. Stoneway applied for a special permit to fill and grade approximately 53,000 cubic yards of fill material . The fill is in part to be located within 200 feet of the Cedar River. A portion of the fill will occur on City property at Cedar River Park. After consideration of the file and the arguments raised by the applicant, the Committee finds that the Hearing Examiner committed a substantial error of fact in that he failed to consider the historical use of the site. Therefore, the Committee recommends that the Council reverse the decision of the Hearing Examiner and impose certain conditions upon the applicant, Stoneway Concrete,Inc. Those conditions should include: 1 ) this approval is subject to State approval pursuant to the Shoreline Management Act RCW 90.58; 2 ) any and all activity involved in this grade and fill must comply with the City' s Shoreline Management Plan; and 3 ) no expansion, enlargement, or change in location of any historical uses, within the Shoreline District unless allowed by the SMP, SMA, or WAC provisions; 4 ) the conditions of the Environmental Review Committee must be followed: a) Haul routes and hours of operation to be approved by Public Works, Policy Development, Parks and Recreation, and the State Department of Transportation; b) All fill materials to be certified as to their cleanliness by a certified professional engineer; c) Hours of filling are to be coordinated with the Parks and Recreation Department; d) A landscape®erosion buffer easement having a minimum width of 30 feet from the mean water level of the Cedar River and a northern setback distance determined by the drip line of existing trees along the river' s edge and running the full width of the western portion of the site from the western boundary ( abutting Cedar River Park) east to the existing sedimentation pond is to be provided to visually screen the industrial uses on the site from recreational uses along the Cedar River as well as to create an erosion buffer from Cedar River flooding; e) Because of the fragile natural environment of the landscape buffer , fill materials shall be retained by earthern berms beginning behind the landscape buffer; NOTE: If ecology blocks are used as a retention device for the proposed fill, they shall be bermed along their river side and shall be setback a minimum distance of 15 feet from the landscaped buffer easement identified in item 4 . above. f) All bermed areas shall be landscaped with evergreen trees and plants as well as soil retained evergreen ground cover; and g) Additional conifer and evergreen shrubbery shall be planted in the landscape®erosion buffer easement for erosion control as well as to create an aesthetic visual screen of heavy industrial uses on the site. 5 ) Applicant shall plant mature trees and densely landscape in the landscape buffers which are being required adjacent to the Park Property; 6 ) Applicant must still obtain site plan approval , at which time applicant must provide specific evidence of the historical uses and locations thereof; 7 ) Applicant shall fill and provide a landscape erosion buffer, as required in 4d above, along the Cedar River shore, along applicant' s site, AND an additional thirty feet to the west of applicant' s (Stoneway' s) western property line. 8) The fill and landscaping which has been required adjacent to the Park, is subject to Park Department approval; 9) Applicant shall install a fence consistent with staff' s prior requirements. Additionally, applicant shall install a similar fence along the . thirty feet • immediately to the west of its western boundary, along the Cedar River. Additionally, applicant shall install a fence along the top of the berm, on or near the boundary line, between Stoneway and the Cedar River Park. 10) Applicant shall construct an . earthern berm on that portion of the site which is contiguous with the eastern edge of the Cedar River Park . This berm shall extend, as necessary, onto the west side of the Stoneway property. Said berm shall be six feet in height above the proposed grade along the property boundary as shown on the grading plan. The location of the berm and the fence shall be subject to agreement between applicant and the Park Department. 11 ) If covenants are necessary, to insure historical use only, those will be proposed before site plan approval. For purposes of these conditions, Shoreline District shall mean that 200 foot strip parallel to the right bank of Cedar River along applicant' s site. The Committee recommends that the Council reverse the Hearing Examiner and approve the fill and grade permit with the above conditions. Dated: March , 1988. Richard Stredicke • Jahn Reed CITY5: 08/3/9/88 CITY OF RENTO Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney "LL Daniel Kellogg - David M. Dean -Mark E. Barber - Zanetta L. Fontes -Theodore R. Parry Assistant City Attorneys March 18, 1988 Mr . David Halinen 10900 N. E. Eighth St. Suite #1000 Bellevue, WA 98004 Re : City of Renton Park Dept. - Stoneway Concrete , Inc . SP-005-87 Dear David: Enclosed please find a revised draft of the Planning and Development Committee Report regarding the above-captioned matter . Very truly yours, Zanetta L. Fontes ZLF:nd Encl . cc: Don Erickson N8. 20 : 51 Post Office Box 626 - 100 S 2nd Street - Renton, Washington 98057 - (206) 255-8678 • PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT TO: Renton City Council Members FROM: Planning and Development Committee RE: Stoneway Concrete, Inc, SP-005-87 City of Renton Parks Department The Planning and Development Committee convened work sessions on February 11, 1988 , February 18, 1988 , February 25, 1988, and March 10, 1988, to consider the appeal of Stoneway Concrete, Inc. (Stoneway) . Stoneway appeals the decision of the Hearing Examiner dated December 11, 1987 On behalf of Stoneway, attorney David Halinen appeared and waived any requirement that the work sessions be recorded. The Stoneway property is located south of Maple Valley Highway and north of the Cedar River at 1915 Maple Valley Highway. Stoneway applied for a special permit to fill and grade approximately 53, 000 cubic yards of fill material . The fill is in part to be located within 200 feet of the Cedar River. A portion of the fill will occur on City property . at Cedar River Park. After consideration of the file and the arguments raised by the applicant, the Committee finds that the Hearing Examiner committed a substantial error of fact in that he failed to consider the historical use of the site . Therefore, the Committee recommends that the Council reverse the decision of the Hearing Examiner and impose certain conditions upon the applicant, Stoneway Concrete ,Inc. Those conditions should include: 1 ) this approval is subject to State approval pursuant to the Shoreline Management Act RCW 90. 58; ✓ 2 ) any and all activity involved in this grade and fill must comply with the City' s Shoreline Management Plan; and -IV 3 ) no expansion, enlargement, or change in location of any historical uses, within the Shoreline District unless allowed by the SMP, SMA, or WAC provisions; . 4 n 4 ) the conditions of the Environmental Review Committee must be followed : a) Haul routes and hours of operation to be approved by Public Works, Policy Development, Parks and Recreation, and the State Department of Transportation; b) All fill materials to be certified as to their cleanliness by a certified professional engineer; c) Hours of filling are to be coordinated with the Parks and Recreation Department; d) A landscape®erosion buffer easement having a minimum width of 30 feet from the mean water level of the Cedar River and a northern setback distance determined by the drip line of existing trees along the river' s edge and running the full width of the western portion of the site from the western boundary ( abutting Cedar River Park) east to the existing sedimentation pond is to be provided to visually screen the industrial uses on the site from recreational uses along the Cedar River as well as to create an erosion buffer from Cedar River flooding; e) Because of the fragile natural environment of the landscape buffer , fill materials shall be retained by earthern berms beginning behind the landscape buffer; NOTE: If ecology blocks are used as a retention device for the proposed fill, they shall be bermed along their river side and shall be setback a minimum distance of 15 feet from the landscaped buffer easement identified in item 4. above. f) All bermed areas shall be landscaped with evergreen trees and plants as well as soil retained evergreen ground cover; and g) Additional conifer and evergreen shrubbery shall be planted in the landscape®erosion buffer easement for erosion control as well as to create . an aesthetic visual screen of heavy industrial uses on the site. 5 ) Applicant shall plant mature trees and densely landscape in the landscape buffers which are being required, adjacent to the Park Property; 6 ) Applicant must still obtain site plan approval , at which time applicant must provide specific evidence of the historical uses and locations thereof; 7 ) Applicant shall fill and provide a landscape erosion buffer , as required in 4d above, along the Cedar River shore , along applicant' s site, AND an additional thirty feet to the west of applicant' s (Stoneway' s) western property line. 8 ) The fill and landscaping which has been required adjacent to the Park, is subject to Park Department approval; 9 ) Applicant shall install a fence consistent with staff' s prior requirements. Additionally, applicant shall install a similar fence along the thirty feet immediately to the west of its western boundary, along the Cedar River . Additionally, applicant shall install � a fence along the top of the berm, on or near the � boundary line, between Stoneway and the Cedar River i1� ,Park . 10 ) Applicant shall construct an earthern berm on that portion of the site which is contiguous with the eastern edge of the Cedar River Park . This berm shall extend , as necessary, onto the west side of the Stoneway property. Said berm shall be six feet in height above the proposed grade along the property boundary as shown on the grading plan. The location of the berm and the fence shall be subject to agreement between applicant and the Park Department. 11 ) If covenants are necessary, to insure historical use only, those will be proposed before site plan approval . For purposes of these conditions, Shoreline District shall mean that 200 foot strip parallel to the right bank of Cedar River along applicant' s site. The Committee recommends that the Council reverse the Hearing Examiner and approve the fill and grade permit with the above conditions. Dated : March , 1988 . Nancy Mathews Richard Stredicke John Reed CITY5 : 08/3/9/88 DAVID L. HALINEN, P.E., J.D. (206) 827-2637 ATTORNEY AT LAW Suite 203 3015-112th Avenue NE Bellevue,Washington 98004 ) 11 February 17, 1988 l+ 1:1-- 5 1 HAND-DELIVERED TRW' `" P� >=; i;"•�iy'J DE . ✓JdG..i_it, „. t Mr. Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 RE: Application of Stoneway Concrete, Inc.: and the City of Renton Parks and Recreation Department for a Special Permit for Fill and Grade (Renton File No. SP-005-87) Dear Mr. Erickson: Pursuant to our phone conversation a few moments ago, I have listed below two proposed conditions of approval that I have drafted in response to concerns expressed by City Council members at last Thursday's Planning and Development Committee meeting. The first of these proposed conditions would modify Condition No. 3 of the Departmental Recommendation contained in the Building and Zoning Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner dated October 27, 1987, while the second would be an entirely new condition (Condition No. 4) . 3. That the applicant (a) construct an earthen berm on the east edge of the Cedar River Park portion of the site extending as necessary onto the west portion of the Stonewav property, such berm to be six feet in height above the proposed grade along the property boundary as shown on the Grading Plan, _ and (b) replace all landscaping along the boundary between the Cedar River Park and the Stoneway site with comparably sized and typed materials, to the satisfaction of the City's landscape architect, as well as erect a six-foot cyclone fence along the west property boundary of their site, prior to occupancy of the subject site. 4. That the applicant execute and record a special Restrictive Covenant (in the form attached hereto) in favor of the City of Renton dealing with limitations on future industrial use of the entirety of the Stoneway site. Mr. Donald K. Erickson, AICP February 17, 1988 Page 2 As I mentioned to you this afternoon, I inquired of my client as to the existence of any ponds within the fill site, and found that none exist. One small portion of the fill site has been used for drying out concrete slurry; however, a similar area of the fill site will be used for like purpose once the fill has been completed. If you have any questions regarding the proposed additional conditions, including the proposed Restrictive Covenant, please phone me at your earliest convenience. Sincerely, David L. -Alinen DLH:sld Enclosure cc: Ms. Zanetta L. Fontes, Esq. Assistant City Attorney (w/encl. ) Ms. Anita West, Stoneway Concrete, Inc. (w/encl. ) PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT FEBRUARY 15, 1988 STONEWAY FILL PERMIT APPEAL (Referred 1/4/88) The Planning and Development Committee considered this matter at its regular meetings on February 11 , 1988, and February 18, 1988. The attorney for the appellant waived any objection to not having the meeting recorded. The Planning and Development Committee finds the Hearing Examiner did not give credit for historic use of the property. However, the Committee determines that is not sufficient reason, in itself, to overturn the decision and approve the fill permit. The Cedar River Strategy Study shows this property is in transition from HO1 to a less intensive use, more in keeping with the river amenities. Approval would suggest that the expansion of the H-1 use is appropriate. It is not. The Committee finds the request untimely. Nancy Mathews, Chair Richard Stredicke John Reed RESTRICTIVE COVENANT This RESTRICTIVE COVENANT is made this day of , 1988 by Stoneway Concrete, Inc. , a Washington corporation ("Stoneway") in favor of the City of Renton, Washington, a municipal corporation (the "City") . RECITALS A. Stoneway is the owner of certain real property located in Renton, Washington (the "Property") that is legally described on Exhibit A, attached. B. The Property has continuously been used for many years for (1) concrete batch plant operations, (2) processing, stockpiling, and sales of construction aggregates (sands, gravels, pit run and similar materials) , and (3) production and sales of concrete pipe, manholes, catch basins and other precast concrete products. Any or all of these uses shall herein be referred to as "Historic Uses. " C. The City currently classifies the Property for zoning purposes as H-1 (Heavy Industry) . The land use element of the City's Comprehensive Plan designates the Property for commercial uses. D. Stoneway has made application to the City for a fill and grade special permit to authorize filling of a portion of the Property that lies along the Cedar River. The filling of that area will allow Historic Uses of that portion of the Property to continue without threat of periodic flooding by the Cedar River. RESTRICTIVE COVENANT -- Page 1 of 4 E. The City has, expressed concern that the Property could be used for industrial purposes other than the Historic Uses, and that approval of the fill and grade special permit application might inadvertently help enable the Property to be used for such other industrial purposes. The City believes that helping to enable the Property to be used for such other industrial purposes would be contrary to the Comprehensive Plan's designation of the site for commercial use. F. Because the only industrial purposes to which Stoneway intends to put the Property (including the portion of the Property for which it has applied for a fill and grade special permit) are the Historic Uses and because Stoneway agrees that the Property should be used for commercial purposes once Historic Uses of the Property cease, Stoneway is willing to restrict the subsequent use of the Property to commercial uses in consideration for City approval of the requested fill and grade permit application provided that by such time the City has classified the site B-1 (Business District) . (The B-1 classification is the City's zone classification consistent with the Comprehensive Plan's commercial land use designation. ). WHEREFORE, in view of these facts, Stoneway covenants and agrees as follows. 1. Covenant. Stoneway covenants and agrees that, in the event that all Historic Uses of the Property cease for a period of 90 days, and if, at the end of such 90-day period, the property is officially classified by the City for zoning purposes as B-1 (Business District) , then Stoneway's rights to use the site for any heavy RESTRICTIVE COVENANT -- Page 2 of 4 - � 7 industrial purposes shall be deemed to have expired; provided, that nothing contained herein shall be construed to limit Stoneway's right (or the rights of Stoneway's successors, tenants, and assigns) to use the Property consistent with Historic Uses. 2. Running With the Land. This Restrictive Covenant shall run with the land (consisting of the Property) in favor of the City of Renton and shall be binding upon Stoneway and its successors and assigns. STONEWAY CONCRETE, INC. , a Washington corporation By: Donald Merlino, President ACCEPTED BY• CITY OF RENTON a Washington Municipal corporation By: STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. COUNTY OF KING ) On this day of , 1988, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared Donald Merlino to me known to be the President of the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on RESTRICTIVE COVENANT -- Page 3 of 4 oath stated that he is authorized to execute the said instrument and that the seal affixed (if any) is the corporate seal of said corporation. Witness my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first above written. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at RESTRICTIVE COVENANT -- Page 4 of 4 BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON In the Matter of the Fill ) and Grade Special Permit ) NOTICE OF APPEAL Application of Stoneway ) of Stoneway Concrete ) Renton File No. SP-005-87 ) COMES NOW the Appellant, Stoneway Concrete, Inc. ("Stoneway") , by and through its attorney, David L. Halinen, and appeals the December 11, 1987 decision of the Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner denying the joint application of Stoneway and the City of Renton Parks and Recreation Department for a special permit to fill and grade approximately 3 .8 acres of property along the Cedar River. The proposed fill would raise the grade of a low portion of Stoneway's existing batch plant site that is currently subject to flooding, creating a relatively continuous grade between the City's Cedar River Park and the balance of Stoneway's batch plant site. Specification of errors and arguments related thereto are listed below. SPECIFICATION OF ERRORS 1. In Conclusion No. 1 of the Report and Decision, the Examiner's assertion that " [t]he proposed fill [is] predicated NOTICE OF APPEAL - Page 1 of 12 upon using the filled area for a parking lot" is contrary to the record, unduly narrow and misleading. The record clearly indicates that the proposed fill area has a history of industrial use and that the subject fill permit request is designed to protect the continuation of such use from flooding. The specific uses to which the Appellant has indicated the Stoneway part of site will be put after fill completion (parking of Stoneway's trucks and other batch plant-supportive uses) will merely be a continuation of the site's historic industrial use. 2 . Conclusion No. 3's implication that the proposal is for "additional industrial development" ignores the historic industrial use of the site and is clearly erroneous. 3. Because the Examiner erroneously viewed the proposed fill as accomodating a new use (parking) where one did not previously exist, the Examiner erroneously concluded in Conclusion No. 4 that " [t]here is no justification to issue the Fill and Grade Permit for a parking area. " 4. In Conclusion No. 5, the Examiner's conclusion that " [t]he fill operation is also not necessary for flood control purposes" because " [t]here is nothing to protect" erroneously overlooks the site's historic industrial use and need for flood protection. Contrary to the Examiner's assertion, the record shows that the proposed fill site is within the 100-year floodway fringe, that the proposed fill will prevent the flooding of this area, and that flood protection will thereby be provided for NOTICE OF APPEAL - Page 2 of 12 continued industrial use of Stoneway's portion of the fill site. 5. In Conclusion No. 6, the Examiner's assertion that the proposed fill would "further degrade the shoreline in this vicinity" is clearly erroneously. . That assertion totally overlooks both the historic industrial use of the proposed fill site and the enhancement of the shoreline that the proposed fill will bring about when completed in accordance with the Zoning Administrator's recommended conditions of approval. 6. The Examiner was without jurisdiction to deny the subject permit on the basis of Renton's Shoreline Master Program. As outlined in the Shoreline Master Program itself, the Building and Zoning Director and the Policy Development Director have jurisdiction for decision-making under the Shoreline Master Program, not the Examiner. ARGUMENT I. THE EXAMINER'S FAILURE TO RECOGNIZE THAT THE PROPOSED FILL SITE HAS HISTORICALLY BEEN USED FOR INDUSTRIAL PURPOSES CAUSED HIM TO ERRONEOUSLY CONCLUDE, ON THE THE BASIS OF RENTON'S SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM, THAT THE FILL IS INAPPROPRIATE BECAUSE THE APPLICANT MAY PARK ITS TRUCKS ON THE FILL SITE AFTER THE FILL HAS BEEN COMPLETED. The Examiner's conclusions underlying his denial of the subject fill and grade special permit application indicate that he viewed the proposal from a regulatory point of view as if it were a proposal to introduce a new use, a parking lot, into an NOTICE OF APPEAL - Page 3 of 12 area that is currently a pristine shoreland. However, that is simply not the case. Far from being a pristine shoreland, Stoneway's portion of the fill site has consistently been used for heavy industrial purposes over a long period of time. Given the evidence contained in the record on such historic industrial use, the Examiner's view and resultant conclusions are clearly erroneous, and his decision should therefore be reversed. A. The Record Demonstrates that the Site Has Historically Been Used for Industrial Purposes. The record is full of references to the fill site's historic industrial use and to the Applicant's intention to continue such industrial use once it has completed the proposed fill. For example, the Applicant's Shoreline Master Application SM-002-87 (received by the Building and Zoning Department on January 27, 1987) states at paragraph 7 as follows: 7. Current use of property and existing improvements : Concrete Batch Plant. Improvements include Batching Plant; Sand, Gravel, and Cement Storage Bins; Equipment Maintenance and Repair Yards; Office Building; Paved Hardstands; Cement Recycling Basin; Concrete Materials Storage Yard. Landscaping [park] . (Underlining added. ) At paragraph 8 of the Shoreline Master Program Application, the proposed use was described as follows: 8. PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY and Proposed Improvements (be specific) : It is proposed to fill approximately 3.5 acres of the Applicant's property and 0.4 acres of park property to bring those portions of the sites to the same elevation as the remainder of NOTICE OF APPEAL - Page 4 of 12 applicants sites [sic] . No change in use of property in anticipated. (Underlining added. ) Reference to the fill site's historic industrial use is also contained in portions of the Applicant's environmental checklist prepared November 18, 1986: A. BACKGROUND * * 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansions, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. Upon completion of the Grade and Fill Project, the existing use will continue. Existing use on Applicant's property is primarily bulk storage of concrete products such as pipe and large blocks and storage of sand and aggregates for batching concrete. The finished site may also be used for overnight parking of concrete and gravel trucks. Existing use on park property is landscaping. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS * * * 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties?: Site is currently used to temporarily store concrete products (pipe, vaults, blocks) . Adjacent west and north is the City of Renton Cedar River Park, adjacent east is the remainder of the concrete batch plant. Adjacent south is the Cedar River. * * * c. Describe any structures on the site. Several concrete material storage bins exist on the site. One vacant sheet metal building NOTICE OF APPEAL - Page 5 of 12 exists on the site. (Underlining added. ) The Master Application for the subject special permit for grade and fill describes the proposed use as follows: Proposed Use: Continue existing Stoneway Concrete Batch Plant use and existing Cedar River Park landscaping. (Underlining added. ) The fill site's historic industrial use was also noted at the November 24, 1987 public hearing on the application. The City's Zoning Administrator pointed out that " [t]he site has been used for heavy industrial use for a period of time . . . . The use is basically a grandfather use . . . . " Additionally, Stoneway Concrete vice-president Anita West made the following statement at the hearing: "In May of 1985 we purchased Stoneway Concrete. Up until that time Renton Concrete Products had leased the portion that we are asking for a fill permit on. That had been a real low-lying area. Renton Concrete Products had made like small manhole parts, and some pipe fittings, and had sold them • from there. Their lease on the property ran out at the end of 1986, so at that time that's when we applied for fill permit to come in there . . . . " (Underlining added. ) B. Because of the Historic Use of the Site for Industrial Purposes, There is an Industrial Use to Protect, and the Proposed Fill Operation is Necessary to Provide Flood Control for Such Use. As discussed above, the record has many references to NOTICE OF APPEAL - Page 6 of 12 the historic industrial use of the proposed fill site. By filling the site, the applicants wish to continue that industrial use without the threat of periodic flooding. (As Stoneway vice- president Anita West pointed out at the public hearing, "we applied for a fill permit to come in there because it's so low the water does come up there. " Further, as was noted on page 1 of the "Report on Revised Floodplain Calculation at Stoneway Concrete, Inc. , Renton, Washington" (part of the Examiner's "Yellow File, " Exhibit #1) , "a portion of the property, adjacent to the west boundary, is lower [than the rest of the Stoneway property] and has been classified as floodplain in all previous studies. Stoneway Concrete, Inc. has proposed to fill this portion of its property and raise it above the 100 year flood level. " 1) Landfilling in the shoreline district for purposes of protecting adjacent property and and flood control purposes falls squarely within the scope of two of the provisions of the City's Shoreline Master Program permitting landfills.2 Since the 1 Page 1 of report prepared by the engineering consulting firm of Hugh G. Goldsmith & Associates, Inc. and submitted to the City of Renton on April 23, 1987. 2 Renton's Shoreline Master Program provides in relevant part: SECTION 7. SPECIFIC USE REGULATIONS * * 7.8 LANDFILL NOTICE OF APPEAL - Page 7 of 12 • Shoreline. Management Program's definition of "bulkhead" specifically includes "embankments, " and since the portion of the subject fill in the shoreline district would protect the rest of the fill area from flooding, the subject fill proposal is a "bulkhead" designed to "protect the existing perimeter land, " and is thus authorized by Section 7. 08. 01.B. Because of the proposed fill 's flood control purpose, the proposed fill is also consistent with Section 7.08.01.E. References in the record to the Appellant's intention to use the fill site, at least in part, for parking trucks are perfectly consistent with the continuation of the historic industrial use of this site. It is the industrial use that the Applicant seeks to protect from flooding. 7. 08. 01 Landfill shall be permitted only in the following cases: * B. When a bulkhead is to protect the existing perimeter land, a landfill shall be approved to bring the contour up to the desired grade; or, * * E. When landfill is required for flood control purposes; . . . * * * SECTION 9. DEFINITIONS * * * * 9.07 BULKHEAD: A wall or embankment used for holding back earth. NOTICE OF APPEAL - Page 8 of 12 Because the Examiner viewed the proposed fill site as one without an established use, he concluded that there was no use to protect. Because that underlying premise of his is contrary to the record and erroneous, his conclusions stemming from that premise were faulty and his decision to deny the requested special permit is clearly erroneous. II. THE EXAMINER'S DENIAL OF THE SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICATION SHOULD ALSO BE REVERSED BECAUSE IT WAS BASED UPON HIS CONCLUSIONS AS TO THE COMPATIBILITY OF THE PROPOSAL WITH RENTON'S SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM, WHICH WERE CONCLUSIONS THAT HE IS WITHOUT JURISDICTION TO MAKE. The Examiner's line of reasoning for denying the requested special permit was based solely upon his interpretation of the Renton Shoreline Master Program. However, by its terms, the Master Program makes clear that the Building and Zoning Director and/or the Policy Development Director are charged with determining a proposal's compliance with the Master Program and with the Shoreline Management Act of 1971, not the Examiner. 3 By denying the application solely on the basis of the Shoreline Master Program, the Examiner was usurping the authority of the Building and Zoning and Policy Development Directors. 3 The Land Use Hearing Examiner only has the authority to approve or deny permit applications in the event of an applicant's appeal where the Building and Zoning Director and/or the Policy Development Director deny an application or attach terms or conditions which the applicant deems unreasonable. See Shoreline Management Program Section 2 . 02 .06. ) NOTICE OF APPEAL - Page 9 of 12 After nearly a one-year period of careful consideration of the subject request and four Environmental Review Committee meetings, (1) they (along with the Public Works Director) had unamimously given the proposal a SEPA mitigated determination of non- significance, and (2) the Building and Zoning Department had recommended that the Examiner grant the special permit subject to the ERC's mitigation measures and two other conditions. With such actions by the Building and Zoning and Policy Development Departments, they most certainly must have viewed the proposed fill as consistent with the Shoreline Master Program, and the Examiner is without power to override their decision. The Examiner's only role in considering special permits for filling and grading is set forth in Renton Code Section 4-2303.2.B as follows: To grant a special permit [for filling and grading] the Hearing Examiner shall make a determination that the activity would not be unreasonably detrimental to the surrounding area. " No directive is given to the Examiner to make a determination of Shoreline Master Program compliance. That job belongs to the Building and Zoning Director and the Policy Development Director. CONCLUSION With the proposed conditions of approval that were imposed by the ERC and recommended to the Examiner by Building and Zoning Department staff after painstaking consideration of the subject permit request, the proposed fill would clearly not be NOTICE OF APPEAL - Page 10 of 12 , unreasonably detrimental to the surrounding area. Instead, the proposal would provide permanent riverbank enhancement along the Cedar River and would eliminate the safety hazard that the site currently poses to children playing near the river, who can currently access the site's southwest corner. Thus, the requested special permit should have been approved by the Examiner. The Examiner's denial of the application was erroneous because he viewed the proposed fill as if it was intended to intrude upon a pristine shoreland for the creation of a new ultimate use (a "parking lot") rather than, as is the case, to provide protection for a continuing historical industrial use. Under Renton's Shoreline Master Program, landfilling is permitted to protect such use, and the proposed fill is thus consistent with the Program. However, in any event, the Examiner should not have concerned himself with the question of compatibility with the Shoreline Master Program since that job belongs to the Building and Zoning Director and Policy Development Director, both of whom appear from the record to be in accord with the subject special permit request. REQUEST FOR RELIEF The applicant has now been waiting nearly a year for the subject special permit. In light of that long wait and given the considerations discussed above, the applicant hereby requests that the City Council reverse the decision of the Examiner and NOTICE OF APPEAL - Page 11 of 12 issue the special permit subject to the conditions recommended in the Building and Zoning Department's Preliminary Report to the Examiner. Alternatively, in the event that the Council would prefer to examine photographic evidence of the Appellant's pre-1970 industrial use of its portion of the proposed fill site before rendering a decision, the Appellant requests that the Council remand this matter to the Hearing Examiner to reopen the public hearing for the purpose of receiving such evidence into the record. DATED this 28th day of December, 1987. Respectfully submitted, t / DAVID L. LINEN Attorney at Law NOTICE OF APPEAL - Page 12 of 12 January 4. 1988 Renton City Council Minutes Page 4 AUDIENCE COMMENT Sarah Nicoli, 3404 Burnett Avenue North, Renton, reported distressed Citizen Comment: Nicoli condition of water lines in her area and explained recent incident in which - Kennydale Water Lines water heaters in her triplex were damaged by back flush from water lines during construction on abutting property. Test results indicated that one of the water heaters contained large amounts of silicone which allegedly was manufactured in water lines due to deterioration and erosion of concrete at points in line. Ms. Nicoli expressed concern that lead and asbestos will be leached from the silicone into the water supply, although she advised that her water has not been tested for evidence of that element. Responding to Ms. Nicoli's suggestion that a bond issue be initiated to fund undergrounding of high voltage power lines and replacement of water lines in the area, it was clarified that high tension lines cannot be undergrounded and undergrounding of other utility lines is normally funded by local improvement district formed by the abutting property owners. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY KEOLKER, COUNCIL REFER MATTER OF WATER LINES TO ADMINISTRATION AND UTILITIES COMMITTEE FOR REPORT BACK. CARRIED. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the Consent Agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. Zoning: Annual Adoption Building and Zoning Department requested public hearing be set on 01/18/88 of Map to consider adoption of annual Zoning Map. Council concur. Claim: Dyck, CL-61-87 Claim for damages in the amount of $153.50 filed by Arthur Dyck, 17717 160 SE, Renton, for damage to automobile tire and rim when vehicle allegedly struck pothole on SW 43rd Street (12/22/87). Refer to City Attorney and insurance service. Zoning: Group I, Parcel City Clerk requested public hearing be rescheduled from 01/25/88 to 02/8/88 E-1 to consider City-initiated rezone, Group I, Parcel E-1 for Group Health Clinic, Vuemont Place Apartments, and Cugini property due to cancellation of January 25, 1988, Council meeting. Council concur. Court Case: North Court Case filed by North Renton/Kennydale Neighborhood Defense Fund v. Renton/Kennydale City of Renton, Eugene Horbach dba E & H Properties, and Lind Building Neighborhood Defense Corporation due to potential impacts from proposed development of office Fund v. City and E & H buildings on Park Avenue N. and Garden Avenue N. (R-016-87). Refer to Properties City Attorney. Finance: Safekeeping Finance Department requested resolution to authorize certain Finance Agreement with Old Department personnel to enter into safekeeping agreement with Old National National Bank Bank. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Police: Jail Operational Police Department requested adoption of jail operational standards as required Standards by State law. Refer to Public Safety Committee. Police: Interlocal Police Department requested review and approval of interlocal agreement Agreement for Drug between cities of Renton, Tukwila, Kent and Auburn to investigate and Investigations counteract drug traffic in the Valley area. Refer to Public Safety Committee. Appeal: Longacres Race Appeal filed on Hearing Examiner's decision on Longacres Race Track Track Conditional Use conditional use permit to compost waste from race course, File No. CU-064- Permit, CU-064-87 87. Refer to Planning and Development Committee. Appeal: Stonewav Appeal filed on Hearing Examiner's decision on Stoneway Concrete, Inc. and Concrete Inc. and Parks City of Renton Parks Department special permit to fill and grade on Department Special approximately 3.88 acres located at 1915 Maple Valley Highway and Cedar Permit, SP-005-87 River Park with approximately 53,000 cubic yards of fill. Refer to Planning and Development Committee. MOVED BY KEOLKER, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL ADOPT .. THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. OLD BUSINESS Council President Keolker presented a Committee on Committees report Committee on recommending Council committee chairmanships and assignments for 1988. Committees (See attached Committee on Committees report.) 1987 Council Committee Chairs and Memberships MOVED BY KEOLKER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE COMMITTEE ON COMMITTEES. CARRIED. Fori.se •By City Clerk's Office Only A. I . # AGENDA ITEM RENTON CITY COUNCIL MEETING s : === ==- SUBMITTING Dept./Div./Bd./Comm. City Clerk For Agenda Of O1/04/88 (Meeting Date) Staff Contact - M. Motor (Name) Agenda Status: SUBJECT: Appeal of Hearing Examiner' s Consent XX Decision on Stoneway Concrete, Inc. and Public Hearing Correspondence City of Renton Parks Department Request Ordinance/Resolution• for Special Permit, File No. SP-005-87 Old Business Exhibits: (Legal Descr. ,;,Maps, Etc.)Attach New Business Study Session A. City Clerk's letter Other B. Appeal C. Hearing Examiner' s Report, 12/11/87 Approval : Legal Dept. Yes No N/A COUNCIL ACTION RECOMMENDED: Refer to Finance Dept. Yes No. N/A Other Clearance Planninq and Development Committee FISCAL IMPACT: Expenditure Required $ Amount $ Appropriation- $ Budgeted Transfer Required SUMMARY (Background 'information, prior action and effect of implementation) (Attach additional pages if necessary.) Appeal filed and fee paid on 12/28/87 by David L. Halinen, representing Stoneway Concrete, Inc. - PARTIES OF RECORD/INTERESTED CITIZENS TO BE CONTACTED: SUBMIT THIS COPY TO CITY CLERK BY NOON ON THURSDAY WITH DOCUMENTATION. U ai eh, CITY OF RENTON '"LL FINANCE DEPARTMENT Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk December 31, 1987 APPEAL FILED BY DAVID L. HALINEN, REPRESENTING STONEWAY CONCRETE, INC. RE: Appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision, dated December 11 1987, Stoneway Concrete, Inc. and City of Renton Parks and Recreation Department Special Permit, File No. SP- 005-87 To Parties of Record: - Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 30, City Code, written appeal of Hearing Examiner's recommendation has been filed with the City Clerk, along with the proper fee of $75.00. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the written appeal and other pertinent documents will be reviewed by the Council's Planning and Development Committee and will be considered by the City Council when the matter is reported out of Committee. The Council Secretary will notify all parties of record of the date and time of the Planning and Development Committee meeting. If you are not listed in local telephone directories and wish to attend the meeting, please call the Council Secretary at 235-2586 any weekday after 1:00 p.m. for information. Sincerely, CITY OF RENTON Maxine E. Motor, CMC City Clerk 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2501 ® CITY OF RENTON "LL FINANCE DEPARTMENT Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk December 31, 1987 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING • STATE OF WASHINGTON) ss COUNTY OF KING ) _ MARILYN J. PETERSEN, Deputy City Clerk for the City of Renton, being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says that she is a citizen of the United States and a resident of the State o_f Washington, over"'the age of 21 and not a party to nor interested in this matter. That on the 31st day of December, 1987, at the_hour of 5:00 p.m., your affiant duly mailed and placed in the United States Post Office at Renton, King County, Washington, by first class mail to all parties of record, notice of appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision filed by David L. Halinen, representing Stoneway Concrete, Inc. for special permit file SP-005-87. Marilyn J. P etJ , Deputy City Clerk SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE me this 31st day of December, 1987. - Notary Public in and for t State of Washington, residing in 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2501 • CITY OF RENTON 24179 FINANCE DEPARTMENT j RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 /-w'a8 19 87 RECEIVED OF A//ia /*l;7 • (sue 7 C.45. ..� TOTAL Received by (74 • L`I--' OIL RFINni QN 1.987 WRITTEN APPEAL OF HE'.RI ~~ z 8�' 10 /RECOMMENDATION TO RENTON CITY COUNCIL. C OFFICE APPLICATION NAME: ORY CLEP,K'S D FILE NO. SP-005-87 cEMMIE STONEWAY CONCRETE, i . m 1"• « -• •: m, 's PARKS AND RECREATION DEPT. / Application for Fill/Grade Special Permit The undersigned interested party hereby files its Notice of Appeal from the Decision or Recommendation of the Land Use Hearing Examiner, dated December 11, 19 87. 1 . IDENTIFICATION OF PARTY APPELLANT: REPRESENTATIVE ( IF ANY) : Name: Stoneway Concrete, Inc. - Name: David L. Halinen, Esq. Address: 1915 Maple Valley Highway Address: 3015-112th Avenue NE, Suite 203 Penton, Washington 98055 Bellevue, Washington 98004 Telephone No. 226-1001 Telephone No. 827-2637 2. SPECIFICATION OF ERRORS (Attach additional sheets if necessary) Set forth below are the specific errors or law or fact upon which this appeal is based: SEE NOTICE OF APPEAL, ATTACHED FINDINGS OF FACT: (Please designate number as denoted • in the Examiner' s Report) - No. Error: Correction: • CONCLUSIONS: No. Error:. Correction: OTHER: . No. ° Error: Correction: 3. SUMMARY OF ACTION REQUESTED:. The City Council is requested to grant the following relief: (Attach explanation,- if desired) SEE THE NOTICE OF APPEAL, ATTACHED Reverse the Decision or Recommendation and grant the following relief : Issue the Special Permit for. Filling and Grading ._ Modify the Decision or Recommendation as follows: Remand to the Examiner for further consideration as follows : Other: i e Appellant/R resentat Signature Date P 9 NOTE: Please refer to Title IV, Chapter 30 of the Renton Municipal Code, and Sections 4-3016 and 4-3017, specifically (see reverse side of page) for specific appeal procedures. 4-3016: APPEAL: Unless an ordinzraca providing for review of decision of the Examiner requires review thereof by the Superior Court;-any interested party aggrieved b) Examiner's written decision or recomn '—'lation may submit a notice of appeal t.. ..Je City Clerk upon a fornTbelispe CityIClerk, within fourteen (14) calendar days from the date of the-Examiner's writTen report. The notice of appeal shall be accompanied by a fee in ecc}o}rdance,witb the Fee 1Schedule of the City. • �f i1 " c ji l fir1 I (A) The written notice of appeal shall fully,-clearly•and-thoroughly specify the substantial errors) in fact or law which exist in the record of the proceedings from which the appellant seeks relief. (B) Within five(5)days of receipt of the notice of appeal, the City Clerk shall notify all parties of record of the receipt of the appeal. Other parties of record may submit letters in support of their positions within ten (10) days of the dates of mailing of the notification of the filing of the notice of appeal. (C) Thereupon the Clerk shall forward to the members of the City Council all of the pertinent documents, including the written decision or recommendation, findings and conclusions contained in the Examiner's report, the notice of appeal, and additional letters submitted by the parties. • (D) No public hearing shall be held by the City Council. No new or additional evidence or testimony shall be accepted by the City Council unless a showing is made by the party offering the evidence that the evidence could not reasonably have been available at the time of the hearing before the Examiner. If the Council determines that additional evidence is required, the Council may remand the matter to the Examiner for reconsideration. The cost of transcription of the hearing record shall be borne by the appellant. In the absence of an entry upon the record of an order by the City Council authorizing new or additional evidence or testimony, it shall be presumed that no new or additional evidence or testimony has been accepted by the City Council, and that the record before the City Council is identical to the hearing record before the Hearing Examiner. (E) The consideration by the City Council shall be based solely upon the record, • the Hearing Examiner's report, the notice of appeal and additional submissions by parties. (F) If, upon appeal of a decision of the Hearing Examiner on an application submitted pursuant to Section 4-3010(A) and after examination of the record, the Council determines that a substantial error in fact or law exists in the record, it may remand the proceeding to Examiner for reconsideration, or modify, or reverse the decision of the Examiner accordingly. (G) If, upon appeal from a recommendation of the Hearing Examiner upon an application submitted pursuant to Section 4-3010(B) or (C), and after examination of the record, the Council determines that a substantial error in fact or law exists in the record, or that a recommendation of the Hearing Examiner should be disregarded or modified, the City Council may remand the proceeding to the Examiner for reconsideration, or enter its own decision upon the application pursuant to Section 4-3010(B) or (C). (H) In any.event, the decision of the City Council shall be in writing and shall specify any modified or amended findings and conclusions other than those set forth in the report of the Hearing Examiner. Each material finding shall be supported by substantial evidence in the record. The burden of proof shall rest with the appellant. (Ord. 3658, 9-13-82) 4-3017: COUNCIL ACTION: Any application requiring action by the City Council shall be evidenced by minute entry unless otherwise required by law. When taking any such final action, the Council shall make and enter findings of fact from the record and conclusions therefrom which support its action. Unless otherwise specified, the City Council shall be presumed to have adopted the Examiner's findings and conclusions. (A) In the case of a change of the zone classification of property (rezone), the City Clerk shall place the ordinance on the Council's agenda for first reading,. Final reading of the ordinance shall not occur until all conditions, restrictions or" modifications which may have been required by the Council have been accomplished or provisions for compliance made to the satisfaction of the • Legal Department. (B) All other applications requiring Council action shall be placed on the Council's agenda for consideration. (Ord. 3454, 7.28-80) • (C) The action of the Council approving, modifying or. rejecting a-decision.of the, `- Examiner, shall be final and conclusive, unless within thirty (30) calendar days from the date of the action an aggrieved party or person obtains a writ of review from the Superior Court of Washington for King County, for purposes of review of the action taken. (Ord. 3725, 5-9-83) • OF R�� IP o- THE CITY OF RENTON co 4$ z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 oNilBARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 9.00 Q,�O FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 9�7'6.0 SEP1°E5 December 18, 1987 David Halinen Attorney at Law . 3015 - 112th Ave. N.E... Suite 203 Bellevue, WA. 98004 . Re: Cop Les Stoneway Concrete File David: Charges for the copies you requested are: Standard Size - 100 copies @ .25 $25.00 Legal Size - 30 copies @ .30 9.00 $00 I will not be able to duplicate the tapes until Monday or Tuesday of next week. I ' ll contact your office when they are ready to be picked up. Dotty Klingman, Secretary 4 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )ss. County of King ) DOTTY KLINGMAN being first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and states: That on the > > th day of December • , 1987 affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this I-`*, day of DeLex)Abio P ; 1987. / 1/CI c/r Notary Pu is in„ and for the State of Washington, \ ` = residing i n� ( �n , therein. Application, Petition, or Case #: STONEWAY CONCRETE AND RENTON PARKS AND RECREATION SP-005-87 (The minutes contain a list of the parties of record.) December 11, 1987 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION APPLICANT: STONEWAY CONCRETE, INC. AND CITY OF RENTON, PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT. File No.: SP-005-87 LOCATION: Located south of Maple Valley Highway and north of the Cedar River at Stoneway Concrete, 1915 Maple • Valley Highway and Cedar River Park. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Application for special permit to fill and grade on approximately 3.88 acres of property with approximately 53,000 cubic yards of fill material in order to bring the property to grade with the remainder of the site. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Building and Zoning Department Recommendation: Approval with conditions. BUILDING & ZONING The Building & Zoning Department Report was DEPARTMENT REPORT: received by the Examiner on October 20, 1987 PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Building and Zoning Department Report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES The hearing was opened on October 27, 1987 and continued to November 24, 1987 at 9:30 A.M. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit #1 - Yellow File containing application, proof of posting and publication aid other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit #2 - Landscape Plan Exhibit #3 - Grading and Site Plan The Zoning Administrator opened the hearing with a presentation of the staff report. In reviewing the application he pointed out the application is within 200 ft. of the Cedar River; 53,000 cubic yards are proposed to be used in a grade and fill operation on a 3.88 acre parcel; 3000 truck loads will be included in the grading operation on the west side of the site. The Examiner questioned the need for a Conditional Use Permit and Shoreline Permit due to its proximity to the Cedar River, referring to Section 7.08.01 of the Shoreline Master Program. Administrator Erickson referenced maps showing the boundaries of the site and it's surroundings; there will be approximately 5 to 7 ft. of fill material; the applicant does have to go through the Shoreline Permit process; utilities are available to the site; and it is felt this use is a grandfather use for the property; the application is a joint application because a portion of the fill will occur on City property on the western portion of the site to grade a berm. Mr. Erickson stated the ERC has reviewed the application with areas of concern such as the size and location of the action due to its proximity to the Cedar River Park; safety of children at the park, and liability in case of accidents; a permit was issued to erect a fence as a safety precaution in June or July of 1987 and as of this date it was noted the fence still has not been put in place. Mr. Erickson stated the 3000 truck trips to be made during this process do not appear to be of concern to the Engineering and Public Works Departments; screening, landscaping, setbacks, noise,-dirt were concerns raised by the Parks'Department for this proposed use as the City is Stoneway Concrete, Inc. and City of Renton, Parks and Recreation Department SP-005-87 December 11, 1987 Page 2 building a new community center nearby; the ERC imposed a 30 ft. landscape buffer along the Cedar River; the shoreline buffer has been imposed to soften visual impacts to the proposed nature and trail system to be completed by the City along the Cedar River; and referred to the existing ecology concrete blocks currently in place along the shoreline of the Cedar River. There were no permits issued for the ecology blocks to be erected. The Examiner questioned how long the blocks had been in place; does the applicant's construction constitute "substantial construction"; does this applicant have a right to use the shoreline for this use? Mr. Erickson said this may be a grandfathered industrial use and the applicant has been permitted to put up the concrete barriers. The hours of fill will have to be coordinated with the Parks and Recreation Department; noise .and dust concerns were expressed; surface drainage and runoff from the operation as pertains to the Cedar River and salmon spawning were reviewed with the applicant indicating they will provide siltation control fences; and stated the concerns raised about surface drainage prompted the ERC to require the 30 ft. setback. Mr. Erickson continued with a review of the ERC recommendations of August 23, 1987 which included such matters as haul routes, clean material, hours of fill, 30 ft. landscape buffer, landscaped berms, additional landscaping for erosion and aesthetic visual screening of heavy industrial uses to be planted in the buffer easement. The applicant is to contract with a certified environmental engineer to monitor the erosion control devices and the quality of surface water run-off and provide monthly reports. The applicant is to erect a permanent fence along the western boundary of the site prior to occupancy of the site; stated the purpose of the fill is to level a portion of the site to provide a more efficient procedure for moving materials. He had no further comments at this time. Testifying on behalf of the applicant was: Anita West, Vice President Stoneway Concrete 31405 - 48th Place SW Federal Way, WA. 98023 Ms. West reviewed the past history and acquisition of Stoneway Concrete noting they applied for a fill permit in 1986 due to the low portion of the property; the proposed new fill area is designated to be used later for parking of equipment but right now is too swampy to do so. Regarding the fence she stated there is an old fence in place along the west side of the property and the applicant has applied to establish a new fence from the west to the south side of the Cedar River which has not as yet been completed. She said they are waiting for the fill permit • before erecting the fence and in that way they can install one permanent fence; they do want to make the fill site safer for the children using the area for a shortcut and feel if they are permitted to place a few rows of ecology blocks and landscaping along the river it would be safer for the Parks Department and the applicant could proceed to use the filled area for parking. The Examiner questioned if the site needed a permit from the Corp of Engineers due to Ms. West's indication that a portion of the site was "swampy", and is there a possibility of flooding. Mr. Erickson stated it was not felt the site was swampy but simply dips lower toward the river and yes, it could become flooded. He does not feel this should be classified as a wetland area. Ms. West closed her testimony with a request for approval. There were no further questions or testimony from anyone in attendance. The Examiner noted the short time frame in which he would have to make a decision on this matter, due to the holiday week, and requested one additional week to consider the matter. There was no objection from the applicant or staff. The hearing closed at 9:50 A.M. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicant, Stoneway Concrete, Inc. and the City of Renton, Parks and Recreation Department, filed a request for approval of a Special Permit to fill and grade approximately 3.88 acres. 2. The yellow file containing the staff report, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. Stoneway Concrete, Inc. and _ City of Renton, Parks and Recreation Department SP-005-87 December 11, 1987 Page 3 3. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the City's responsible official, issued a Declaration of Non-Significance (DNS) for the subject proposal. 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. 5. The subject site is located at 1915 Maple Valley Highway. The site actually consists of portions of the Stoneway property and Renton's Cedar River Park located on the north bank of the Cedar River. The Stoneway property, subject to this request, is in the southwestern corner of the Stoneway site - approximately 500 feet wide by approximately 350 feet deep. The park property to be filled is approximately 50 feet wide by approximately 350 feet deep. 6. The park property is zoned P-1 (Public/QuasiPublic), while the Stoneway property is zoned H-1 (Heavy Industry). 7. Both properties are part of the original townsite of the City of Renton and both received their respective zoning with the initial adoption of the Zoning Code, enacted in 1953 by the City Council. 8. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of commercial and recreational uses, but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the Plan. 9. The Stoneway property is located immediately east of the Cedar River Park. The area immediately across the river is designated natural in the City's Shoreline Master Program. Across the river is the proposed Cedar River Trail which will eventually connect with Liberty Park west of I-405. 10. The applicant's propose placing approximately 53,000 cubic yards of material over the approximately 3.88 acres. This filling would raise those portions of the site subject to the permit to the level of the adjoining property. The depth of material would vary from approximately five (5) to seven (7) feet. 11. Stoneway proposes utilizing the filled property for parking for its truck fleet. The City actually joined the request to slightly modify the area where the Cedar Park joins the Stoneway property, and to assure that landscaping would be installed to provide an adequate buffer between the park and concrete plant. 12. Approximately 200 feet of the proposed depth, measured north from the Cedar River, is subject to the Shoreline Master Program. 13. Approximately 3,000 truck trips will be required to complete the importation of the fill materials. 14. The applicant described the area which would be filled on the Stoneway site as swampy. Almost the entire area for which the permit has been requested is in the 100 year flood plain. Staff has determined that filling the site would have little affect upon flow conditions, although some displacement of flood waters which now utilize the site would occur. 15. The Shoreline Master Program only permits fills which benefit the general public, to repair existing bulk heads, and for flood control purposes. 16. Another justification for the fill enumerated by the applicant was to keep children from entering the .subject site. That same reasoning was provided to the Building and Zoning Department which issued an exemption for fence construction since the applicant indicated its insurance carrier was quite concerned about existing conditions. That exemption was issued in early summer and was never acted upon. 17. Certain portions of the Cedar River Shoreline in the'vicinity of the subject site have been altered. Staff was not sure when this activity was commenced. The applicant provided no details of the work. CONCLUSIONS 1. The proposed fill was predicated upon using the area filled for a parking lot. A secondary purpose may have been for flood control although, flood proofing a parking lot does not appear to be justified under the guidelines presented in the Shoreline Master Program. Stoneway Concrete, Inc. and - City of Renton, Parks and Recreation Department SP-005-87 December 11, 1987 Page 4 2. Since nearly half of the subject site is within the shoreline area of the Shoreline Master Program, the Special Permit requested is subject to more strict review. A permit in that area may not be issued for speculative reasons, nor may a permit be issued for mere industrial development. While a fill may be issued for flood control purposes, that would appear to mean to protect uses from flooding. 3. Industrial uses are permitted in a shoreline area if they are water related. The parking area proposed as well as the remainder of Stoneway's occupancy are not water related. Additional industrial development, especially to facilitate a mere parking area, is an inappropriate use of the shoreline and is not permitted under the Shoreline Master Program. 4. There is no justification to issue the Fill and Grade for a parking area. 5. The fill operation is also not necessary for flood control purposes. There is nothing to protect. The fill will merely enable the site to be used for parking which is not a permitted use-in the Shoreline Zone. 6. There seems to be little reason to further degrade the shoreline in this vicinity. There appear to be other violations along the bank in this area, and until staff can determine whether non-permitted filling, grading and alteration have occurred, new permits should not be issued. The necessity has clearly not been justified in the current request. DECISION The Special Permit to grade and fill the subject site is denied. ORDERED THIS 11 th day of December, 1987. . ea" FRED J. KA MAN HEARING E MINER TRANSMITTED THIS 11 th day of December, 1987 to the parties of record: Anita West Stoneway Concrete 31405 - 48th Place S.W. Federal Way, WA. 98023 TRANSMITTED THIS 11 th day of December, 1987 to the following: Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Richard Houghton, Public Works Director Larry M. Springer, Policy Development Director Members, Renton Planning Commission Ronald Nelson, Building & Zoning Director Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator John Adamson, Developmental Program Coordinator Glen Gordon, Fire Marshal Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Renton Record-Chronicle Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, 'request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 P.M. December 25, 1987. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of $75.00 and meeting other Stoneway Concrete, Inc. and City of Renton, Parks and Recreation Department SP-005-87 December 11, 1987 Page 5 specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. - • I a . ..v., , i• % ..ti --_ - r....•-•:...: . Ill , 1.1 4 - • •'-'.•:•:•.'.. .P.!....,,IL • - :...4.:.....::'...:. ....!.%4-7t. 1. 1k W LAND USE ELEMENT --.roo..L, -::•........ St:.•. t6 1 ......., . ,. .: . , i per?,• , i .00.,;,,,i',:•:•.•:- :47\h --ets:-•: \a Single Family Commercial -, -., (.....0-0,---st Pi?. e- ------... --• .• ) ' *: 'N 7c;O'cro-.4 • irl:".:I ''-' 00000 ..6. i*" ,,,,.,,1 mr,e A ::::•: *:::::::::•::* Low Density Office / Office park r::::7..,.,,„,,,,,.Jr mil • •:•: i * •. •••••::::.i A N.I III/1 II•V ... •,,,... ....-,.!!!/,:i ,.....-...E, _ i 1 .y.,1:.:::::isi:::i::.::: :•:.:.:•,./.....;;;71 , , :::::::::::::. _, -,2,•,„.•emer: . , :::::::::„. F.,4/MEW'••., mi.T 0.00000.0.000, ;i6.:;-,:-.. ..?...:x:i 4!......,4 - - ' ..- -..r...........--..x.,..... ........r...., NMI,.. „00.0000.000000 Public/Quasi-Public FrA80:::1 i.:::a: kr:mm r'mmmmm nit . •••• .....:....,....._•-• .„,..•.., •.:. tio,v,„.&., •;:%frein.111 . • . L . ...1 ; -',!4•-1--Vt, High Density ,••00•..• Light industrial 1.11Mtbi..i.....• „,.. ,, ,,, ,•;4•,,<:,, •0•••• • - --4 f.•.„„:.;. --,- „ .0:- Multi-Family :•, ris •ft.s.......:,-._-_- 4.,,•4:0,•;,, , 0001. 411 ...„, ..0• .......11 ., „.1 .t.•,.. Recreation 6 6 6 Heavy Industrial . 000 •:-.:Tea • ... . . ,0,.,....: . . • 4..1....z.t.k 1 ' ''f-i•-e''''v.' Greenbelt IM Manufacturing Park ,t,•,.. . ibillill ,... ..'gweissmat. C.0• - Z. ' 1./. • '... ., .. '' ' ': / Multiple Option -lf‘) •...0.. „:•:.:•:•:.„,:„..,:•:::::„.:.:.:.:. f• Ili' 14,6„ ..30•00.. ...:.:.:.:.:„.:.:.:„.„.::::::::::::... . Revised April 1985 •:;•••:. ' " 11. :::4.;: ,V. •-'''" i - ,,,,,, , •••••••••••••:.:.:•:•:.:,-... . -0,3. ----- 0000000000 ..., •• , ••• . •.•- - - .if,1 ::::::: 4,4::'1:4, '•. *•:•:•:•:C.:..y.:.•,....F., .., •0000 ••000000C 00• .., ...L:115 .0:::0;!0:...•0!•,'0.0.0 ,• ,.5• 0.; .. 1:::: •::::: :.:.::, • •., :::.,:. :::ii. ' i.+. r, :.:. ,.:::*..ns: ...' ‘:•::::::::::::•:'''. '......:::.:. 0000000000•0000000000. • FMam. o'-'o'-'o'on'o°0000.0,4,:.•0 .,,er.f. •,„"...:.: ....:,.9 il o., ..: • ..: ."....c iirs•,..,p•r' ,::::;::*::1:;*ia,,,5 :•:•:•:•:<•'' .•:::•:::::::::: ,0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02.0_0_0000000N0000. , 000000000000000 it'`‘, •1,60.4115k,••••I.i,.`;,, .,-. '...• ....•jr.::.',.46 •,,,40:i:::iii:iiii!•i::::*:::. • %.::::•••• ,•0000000000000000 v u.w 0•0000000000 ...; •I „ ,ti :. Iry?g8ggggi°2°39.8g.:22"39;° :?g:1 411111311p17r.iir " ..:,:f4,' '`H, P1:. .....:•:::::iiMiiin 0°00°093°.•0°00°00yoonocogot: .:1•.,•:;?;?,,.)::::?c,?.?„? guggg:%?0,;.4 Ill ..i..,,,,, ac:!....,r,. - ,,, . • •::::::::::::::::::::::„....... •000.000.0• . • .-.,;,•„,,,,,‘••.,.......,...., ::,: :mi: . 000coo,00000000.0.0%00....000.00000.08:), ,. . 1 Ell L.- . ,,°:,.44444:.Fij- i-,z--41,Pw4.44,.:,4 R 13• iali:::r'ALIA 1 i :Oral„,:troa"."...:,--''` . '•:':§1igi:O.:i::i:i:I.o2:)0 0o o oo o o.0o0oo0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o. .11,Mil*AA:4'64 11/414Thr....,t,Atigaiwro kAtIliii:K-: ' .7.1rf.• i. 6111414k II la•111511'''''474/ 4 II'••f'- - ' 'pioto.°_.00110...<'. ..: 'iii.iM 1.09209Cooto°:.ro:o°:o0o°09°,4:o°0009:Ro:!it "" 1.'t Wi::::::::::::::::::::'1.0000000000000000000 I i. ‘1;•.;e: .goo.0'oo'oogogogo• l' 141k!.:y7",-.pi le k ,.;'I I, I. - . ..,,,,,A.iii ,„II In,..,... , .:30gogogo2og ,iir r I Ha.4s,i'' ,.ei.t/ ,,ir,...., •e ;.•:„ .00000•.. :::::::::::::::::::m: ...,•••- .00000 ..000,0000000000000, ,,,•.3000,300.3., . 1 1' °O°0°0°0°0°0°0°0° A•„' o o o • . . likii:!.. 41111::.itkocp00000o0 1, III..1:hill:::!.0..,..„,c• .1. j,,,.. ...c.._:„.7m}...1, . Q i.„,,,..,,,,.., ..x.:.:.:.:.:...,:.:.:,:.:. . , ,, .o0o0o0o0 0 0.,4,, . , rz--.:--..:...:...1.-.......i.:: Ja . IRN tins m t '...s AIL%I 1 ILI Iiiiii i i II I II f)°°..?• a•..- ---77 l'... '' '' . JUM '. 'liill:::iili:::i.:::::: :. . :it.,*10: i.e .4„,.. ..3... 11E2115r 'an slum.le P.'....a./ • 4•-•.. ' •,..':.II Ili: .1.,..ci 'W:'ili, •• ''::::i0i:::•••• '.-:q'4(2*..srs!,.)i'.(:).`.':'-q.c ......•==::--......m.--tm...minim IT In..............4.''"..e4•14,4P - ''' ;•i••\'`...'_ t .'l '''''4•74.,/a.,7. • ''''' ,r - •/'•r.?1•3'n,..9 ''.^."0..i.'Q...` 1.)".•.. '• i...) l'iiiii."-"."-111."11111iM::::Irra,',A lef.3•1/4'*.S?\6•4'14';'`•- "•-"'''4%.r.4311'4,-"YP4''''.PI''. (";;72‘..313,4.'9.?fl?a;'.if.11•'';•..''0'4,:i. : ‘ .., v. .XIIIMI.).111:1r1611111!!". I ',', ,;:?.'4' `.-.'' t)("4-0.:. .„-,4„ :. ''111,;117°42.:`?"..'.•;:ji.;:tr?'6':..t.:.‘4::;.•51 ri.... ' "el'?::.:7'."'l'*(P-:.411r6.4111;.(;; al'A 11.411("Knill i..,iii...' .4..!:',..,9%,,, ..?.„4..44^' ' f; ,z. 't01 --?..: ' il. : i i 0.... .....:::ti. tige , •• ..,...:.,,;,,,,,.*Inf.- "4„, ....„. :..., s'i'mr..1:4;.:',„ ''''',\04,„ Num 7 ',Pl.r ` s i• (4. -- ••'.:.:.:•:...:.:qqqqqqq..q.:.:.:.:•:-: ' 0 ,1.emit ..' ..;:l.::::::::::::::: .1.1X ' 'I -1.4:: ono,. .„.,7,,,..„..,;:v.-...: ,,g • --...., i ' .,. lo,. .. ... ...,'-..-- .-.• -,... 140.,,, 1....... grgith.;41;‘,4. -_-__ *.•,''•:::::':::,*::::i::,:'::::::::::::::: •% '.I- - , ,..,,,,,,m,:i:wii? pi: ; fr. • .r:. , • ' ' v ''• '(•,' -4.1P. -- Ado, e,r;,:st,c., ..• iiiiiii4ftig':§k4 . ..ar t, c ' , .•V.`,'''''::.M.:P.N"'• . ... . '''` ,...„ 1,, r.,. . Nag:%::-Rm t ,,or, ,, 110 14,-,..„--, ,..;,%;•,,)•,,,,,o;;,....,;•.et:;;,;.„ ..);.,w 0;..,),e.,.,:.le, iiks-,.., A.,111141 kniomm:lateli„ ll.P. 1:- .. ,;$.;.;1,var,. ;:i 0.1.. .fi,::•7i.:1)°*''°.Viji-C^P:,. •., -.."'""s V. - ------- ........,. ,..Igvaiiigilmi,,,,„ .. mg L.. -) i,01%) 1,:•••'•3•S',51..°' •''.!'.e.) - . '.--"..4. . 'il : --- i- _______,_m,-.y.1.'2.2!Atli.*... S..4',--.'"...f.:;‘z; ` - ------ . I. .0,0 * : .4; III II,:'6.v.,00000.000000:00.: ,,,140.4.,4;c.?II... ..,,,:....1/2. .!...,. ,. iv I I• I •80D:11:P1124 .t c' 0 1.(.:.•(9 Clt!15!..f' ,2)Qii.. .:•(1")..•'4... -:41#-}Iliej: . I I I. •ti Pr.: ..-.7 ,-. . . .... ,. f. c:),• ,•1,3.1,...?.,;t'..,).)9.',..1*c.0'.ri.?..„...,i'l,,c;•I,.44.5.;.., . ;„,'..1"t'ty, ti 1;inesm•misar , , .... L. II ' 'n:ko. .d0 :'''a;11k.ltre.<"..1.i•V.CeA..P:ri1d1../' .3 R'.•;..4F1".UIP:;.:1 1 ___ _ _7 ...•-_-_-_-_- .•,,,,..or.......m.i . • ).0- .c...• • ,.‹. • wit 0 ,...'„,...cr-( .p, '..., L )4 „. ,,....ib;:;i. ..•,), - .. 1 i'••::.:**:::•:,:'" :::',5.3',.)• . 0 ';',V,...V....nq...'. .1 :,•)::„ea.....,%,, ,c.,,,,A,-,%..,.. •/-...,,v;;;.›,z,,.4).0...,›Li,•,0.-4:,..1.4. & -:-.:-L--I_-_•-_-...:-:----,,.,-- --.woo, -.. .. ......,................. . ..i.V.,,..,.kJ . ....(0.,,Ij'• .v.„'fl.olt • ,`. ' •.`..••t t••0. ta Vs", ,I.,il.,. .N. . 0 Alt-------- - ',',4%1-1-Willrn '1•=411411- t•'1 i.9 ..;,-..:::::K:::::::i:::::!*::. /`'L• a••• )N,1?:.,(Lyed,.....,,,Bo,'.,,,.,, .0. .0. vp,a„ ,(... 11.,... ,.,tb',?±)(to in 0.1.(:,{,:flt...51--- 1 e V*C.lit _ aleir.,•^.T.we,f • • ...,,..:::: ..:.i..:..5..:..:..5.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.::. ...:Ell;.,%,,I)...:.....,•e ..009,00.0.. .41e,.,,. ..,.. .::,!:..-:: ::..a.c,c,N.,,,..1,,,,...!... ..t,•-_,-....n_ r_ - -- ...rvg,-._ -- ...• • i•.,%..s?;,.. _.-_-_- _ ,i,„:,.,. :..--_,;_-•_ __K---:4-60.m.....--. - -- 1,12--- .ii lwasw.;._...... ....t.„.".:.:,.,.;.. .. ___:_:_wp mu 0-01'110 MEI hat-40:Piiiiiigii..:iiiiii ..? 1/ c.,kr,::: .0 0• ,•.\0_0_0„. _ 1.'LL,'''.„_.,...:..7....Z.::-./tki..41'`*.11.1) Ii.F,X:.:, 'AU. ..1).•• .°0•V' MI6 . '.‘ '''' '' .. ..‘..V.i1S's:t•,:ii. ...y.4,.,11•,,,'..._.. ,..,Vill,f3:,.: . ., A .. 4:3 ti:.t1.8;4.... ).". .P. '''N •. .: itrieFira- .00°§6•4•ti,,, .7:%'.1);<,i .•b,•s!c•.1- - . ' 7' ''' '''' -A.' ..w..-'' '‘'''''i ': ''1 4:::::::Viiii!ii.':::' .•0'9,c6:°0°°°...' '-% '°0°.°0°.°0°0.•: •,,,,ri, ----- 111'.'` i .. Na,k,v. . E-• .0c, k 0.00• , . ''0;5';,:' .3..0.(,. a.:-, --_-_-.17-=.-7-2--_-_-_-_- -‘,..- .%.. r-....: Er 1 0, ‘.....x.•,,,,, ,,,. \ 0. ,.•,.. . 00. . •a'Q• 000• Int. A. 41 A„...*, .000• C.'•:L.2i --= •-- ___-_-:-Vo.'0':-:-:-1'-'-`'''o ) 4• .0 o o ::::::•:•:•:•:.......- NAt,„ •00000. a.8 '''. ----- --------Vo9D°.-_-_-_.-: r',• -• flosii,\60.....70,,,i . ,...tz ai usig __--_-•,_-_-_-_-_-,000_0_0.-_-_-_ 1.43:-...,. •--- ••••••••••••••••••••••• - . ''".'44%,„.4.:-•o 0. 41 .- .9090o0o0o0o. ....,4. 44 Alliiiit' 44- . ono 1.:.-• ----1------- ..eno...•,..w. • 0,.,,..•• .:...iii.:::::::aa:.•...i.:.::.::.2.. ..s1 anus ,., _ ____ ..:.',••-,..3 E., - A NIIINimema EMIR.4:s,: '. .dm, -__ ---___ ...1%...1.7V g... .:.....„...,.. t• - nisi c..-,...., .... , •,..i?'v, -_c'_...V._.7._•___•:c..12_,•4 t •;....,... ,00000000.,ci..1..zr: 'N:000000,000000000:0:i• .o0o0o0o0o0o, "IIIIIII:‘ IF. Nam a' ..0o0o0o0o.„co ,,,,... ••••••• 00000 0000000. . .•t. 000000 I „,,A, win, .008:600.0.0. r••-ggiE t• _.....,,,,, _0_0000000. •:., :., :0.0002:60.000, 0. ■ - ' -- -- tavrEG-_- "'•g r'• -7ma_ -_-7_-_- . _ 1•;....,. it, ..,.., . ;.00.000.0.000. •....., ,..„ ..,, M 406, pi. . ,000.00.. ...., , .•••......., .. vool .:.C... •0 01 •0.;n''A•.-,....../ ------_---'. 7.7.. to. • 4? . IL •0 0 0 •0 0( V..,:...j.'...17-.15:.•Z =7:-..7- =-1----:-:-..T. --.-...'..;0 1,4 - V'::."'::-3's.''.-..2" --------- ----1'''' r • ft 't/v .L, .., ....ii., ..1..., , W. .7:N imni , , . :1 , . . ono.‘411. Illuiralll ...........-....... .., I ....• .„•::::::::•:=-_-..,., .. , . .. "••-•". „ ".L.„, . ., .•• 1/--------------------------- -- 4 ,fie ,v,z-rx 4 ::.:.::*...:::::21:::.ci- - 1.1- . 1 ._- , -_-_-_-7_-_-_-_-__-_-_-_-_-_- ...••)?-_,••.41 .. 1 •:•:.: •::.::::::::::Mi:::.! 11""k It ' .-41k 1. VITA' ./-_-_-_--,--_-_-_-__-_-_-_-_--..la s L're„i.),.).,-.2.:-..•• I , ::::::: :.M::::::::::::::„ 1 sem a, • t i ___________________ _....-____ Amiens, .00o0o0o0o0.0.:'" __,..., egardi.-_-----._;:::•:•••• ..4::11::101, .., __---- ------- diewillow .00000000• 3' c••"' ,. ... .'44)F," ---_ ..,k.Y NI - 000000000:. 2C.;.%, .. 1 ' -I '7..6'. .00000000.t.:. ... • 'A 41101111r ' ,009644 •r:e,,.,. ,. t . -:-:,41e-t-E40----- no'in ii 1 FA 11,; 0.000000000000000000000 ,7 ,. i 1.;.. '1 •- I. \ . , • 7r:72-Of fied-7.-:--- 1 0000000000000K: '....•,; J,;61' ,lei) e• mil( 4....., ...0.0...• ..•:.• ..„:. • . of.„,..1. •. i .., .., • ,.. .., . . _r"---w ) :' • _ • • -.a.L^ ILA - ---- '- -- '----...��.-. -.' -.' r ---' :"x-b. - ;-, -...'- � • b mil. - ,,_.. i.„.., êk • . .i,:ti ,p tot" I,,� / Il. .. ,,... ,,, ly i _ ......... _ --..-, _ -_..„._ _,,,,. . . . „Li 3.. • P' / ' MV , .. inni l'allagif d , 0 : 7,. '.is • 4 IL-. L u �/ jJ _ {— - q .+P. VI i i rr) •, ili I 43 /,,,,-,• • •,..• .' . -..4,' 6:4 , +'�rja �J1 a :L� / k '-� ���' v 1•I7tfQ_.11y t tr.. / \+ C'i Y Y L pititl / 11 � ' 3 Jam►' f-11-i, r}. � „ Imo , 1 v /' r ' y\ ' i/ a 4 0 ✓:-.'.^ y .c' W I ��\ n .! 1!�of41' [W N. �� 0 7 l. t ��e ,, LIBERTY / ,/ \�\\ = . " _ � Y 440 y ra � W, f \ 6v aMe oNog MTOuv. o u�,�g m CEMErE ti � .. t �A`� � . PARK zt / ;�. ,i CEDAR RIVER \ b�• - 1 /1)/a / - PARK \ b S p t r „\T� {� e I ! I•! / / �. ; f/9Qeci �,' ..e. Corr \ 2 •\ /.��/ ��-� / '• \ S �. -7A.,.. • - f. . ., "11111111 :r- 4 - - Ill' .• z - . � A ' } 3. 1-fit \ \ fi \ 7 i„.. _ ..,.. • r14! 4 F TTH . . r 'N: !'''%.q ... - 3 ' Ira•-. - ' 2® 1 . \ ' STONEWAY CONCRETE and CITY OF RENTON ' ' PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT- SPECIAL PERMIT: • SP-005-87NI , STONEWAY CONCRETE and APPLICANT CITY OF RENTON, PARKS DEPARTMENT TOTAL AREA 3.88 ACRES PRINCIPAL ACCESS MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY EXISTING ZONING H-1 .(STONEWAY CONCRETE). P-i- CEDAR RIVER PARK - _ EXISTING USE STONEWAY CONCRETE-INDUSTRIAL, CEDAR RIVER PARK-RECREATION - PROPOSED USE INDUSTRIAL USE-STONEWAY CONCRETE, RECREATION-CEDAR-RIVER PARK • • COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN COMMERCIAL-STONEWAY CONCRETE; RECREATION-PARK COMMENTS THE APPLICATION FOR' A SPECIAL PERMIT TO ALLOW FILL AND GRADING ON 3.88'ACRES WITH 53,000 CUBIC YARDS OF MATERIAL IN ORDER TO BRING THE. PROPERTY TO 'GRADE WITH THE REMAINDER OF THE SITE. . . . LOCATED AT: 1915 MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY. • • a • J ••e• T H10RUSHT Nit • '.I - p.m lies Pi f 'Et+ ?S I PtIY m ucIieH®: - \` M N.TM TOLL411. • �`-ai 4 .'S�r,.i''g A. .01 • - \ 5� l A. DESCRIER. PM to IT'JI@POSTS • - , 5T ie �• -.-•:_.51 40b 2000 lee:per me et•sib•-71..(Bantu el W Kul. ��\..••••\ - e.of perimeter 1.1.tee than De are(f)Iraq Pore,sate have tee S.O.O.MGM.wet lss M.0,S la•yr .t.r. . t• /) • 't. STRBILIZO y\ an Daum tension .. eon.fabric of re„.Sall D,In im MM. • Mori a e.a..,b f o rF' r cos Port -cB - \\�`• �°so la.'i-Tr parr me. D •rk tma iccas elm etev pro.. See plan for ran.,«atIm. UM POSTS C. RUM. \ I/r 0.0...1.1.at Ina than 3.65 fa,Per L.P. nSch P S,... .3 e j m� ,a i -� to-a*m c.n>aneo-nl4n prnvt•e fors. M.et••r•v of 5m Da. '. pm rotas - . Y: l '.N£' - O. ingot In1azwEa Intl `, 3 o B. IwlEWIS .«.(.l•'cei il'uii0ee r:+<e�J r�oerl:o tsmn:,Slit,-:-...':1"......,::„.:;.::,,,.'. A so la.I1..rnt • c. ,S,�/• ` I TSS....Stimberm ham - \ \ lM' •a aria, used In mstnct+m of mean not fee. poll to Mega•mar m tees.of adjacent 11.opst. mrem • ea. 3 - �'([ n mpsasta..ISWasellsas-saute Ylq/a.-Les Delay • \ • •FAT SS 0...1'•r•Me m..-Meaml Prism v. Iron or steel materiel shall be gelveMzed except as hereinafter •n SarYi; , S5 On.1.1.1-010 Pln \ rWWa. ...Hy galvanized material or nbrlel up.Nfd serious 131ia COATED STES`rtme0s ',� DA 6,L T:t�IVE V sapam dl la-Iv1as0 PM, \ •bus` aDarufem e/C,lvazlw am will ant bus acceptable. if roar ies ml,axeua a {tt1�a W hardware call he of emerelel prW er :P,.-_ i • N E Ydbeolle M.-01.Ef.a Sus. - \ a 11 et free of San Mes. All MGM v9•n to be galvanized after better wa,q, ,nowht cast as appropriate article. W • iSE,.• QE SS Mica sKWlastpo-Arroyo Lg1we welding 1n staple pfev. sff+cfma In strewth and other promt clef s.Drosl4 a Delm. .1. • 'Mr'S •i Y f s 0• E Canasta tie...-Plela Coro.e • `, use to conyunat,m NM fabric•pest-and Mrn of tM In ,A. Pors :.O Myer•'' : v--rr✓!!f.' •11,1 ` )S 01p1411s purport. ``\ ``• \ •IOC base ester.for Nat manufacture of steel pipe used far n'and qe tried herein. Weight of zinc coating on Mow listed steel flttl cogs ' y P, - V �� \S braces shall cell/on to emir...Mk.Design.. Al2D,except shall w.1.2 W.per aware foot. \-tt J\•� Part' ' !.' J >asd his m+iN1./rW n1a.Wean seal Cogan.Doff Orffn 0ua tA1s. Castro `• \ weight telormu v tutelar poste Mall be applied ss....... 9 f 17- �=���^^"�' /y\ 9allq.411foro1.9f516 W1))TBS-pq5. SIS.Op Wr W,md. \S •WS N v elm 'T 200 {• : ` / - . V 2•{ ` •All Was and braces Mall a M-dipped galvanized. T.,Mall have a All is far Min TIN fence sate a fitted WO a onG elv.iz•d 57 Nm....•.ap.of 1.6 a. a W canes W.soon•rase er..aim man p«sn.`we•tat mar el..+®w m exth Weds 4aim.ate nd,e.wiatm. jam/ �a, 169�I !P P. \ \ \`�\ -elm w,nefvlwl test caw lne wen 1.z W. xat co.nw mU xw... roat of wham•..•. m w Mm e/m.r.mad.rrsr p1W. v•a. IPom,a bus 1r - • 0 \ `� Is Wised as total area 1ss14 and wren•. A demo fir muut o t<1pWd Wleanlxed stea eon salt be not less teas Ue• x 3/1• d I • ` •n oI welp.t e1 rating fa WOW as.1i•lec0 plan pen iry each .mlr��llext n fNMc height. here an n D.threaded Omagh fabric used • N G o \ • \ ....or Wlvanlz.d wean... 1te+wa.al4cn tee,pa a e.n Nut, a My b>W na of ten...............". w '!'.ir I p; 2a s r''i p•,, ��•• Y4CLEy---wAt / ,Ivanlxed•in accordant.with...Ants of AM 4elgatice .. P.M. .11 be provided for rem.mad post•tea to are fur Cull •mad comer r. \\.ell, °owr atama can a wlmlva.a eWivva n.nlafser. • .k'v ahu .� / f \ \ ��Rceia� iEaslu ntms r _I ' O I G L\��a/ / 0 .•992 < \\\```• 11 a+n Itn•rant Nan'crane a cvasrlel mlle>eel Nn rod vi.aned steel tewiv a ds San he p7:1,1 elm =VI W \ / .a5 /' \o ,svm IeFo U apOrea'x4 2-1nN milbn d1naM aN. farlx poll a B Din• in and pr tourer re a of m eMe Mll at flat anal UB• .r„ •.A I. // ' s \ •yuia.dr.(O.1.8.d m.).wiled selvage W top am M.. see•. spuvt m post San 4 n use w.e man n•Yv..el•. T < a� Renton Hill, ,`9__.LL\:' / ceded \ '�3.it are/m to MO Design..MU mad Nall be CI.I Wimlzed a D.Nt hems • �- -._T- b i00 / / ea,3 ,\, t'd(p Wogs. -41.1xw.40 env bands M11 be mat.where brad.+s rm..m tpa.r e.Wn test. Thete awe well D.aem.l>futenaa v rev x d Bern'Sal" -- / _ f:e.ia antlS bias,\e,W.t side oI Wm. tea am•Pe and. 0Wa Wes Y a 1n•a sea•nit se•.i. • PROJECT SITE o \ " - <LA9 FTR RDfn •900 8 \ ' \ • lire m�flus avail he glided for aLtethlng thelo lint fwlc 11we 4''ra 5'-IirQH - • o \ \ .e inur.,v of W e Wn man N•. n.•w a er.reel 2i wen. vlCvaTruAP ``)£� °q c L 4 �e"I.'o . .db 9 •p90 \ 1`vWltan,ex0 m aaslm 9 gum. ct ' • SCALE 1 120t i; ,�- a � •\ Tanis del r garoan+x.d with a rote t,- ties cr ot�Mv ¢ 1 .1b` Wc[Nle fitting. Y,vn v rats with heavy Arena steel ceWa'c rt i�. e +a<.i'.{� o.9e9 ••peg '_ :99 \ \ \ �,(/y 798110 VIM this reinforcing are shall-.use. >Wuge urn Ina Mre and Nan a .. E ''''''.• s. - - ._ 9 \ `' + `/\\ zz• .wet eg of no Dlm than 80 oK4NlMar*foot. Salt'i 4 9 gam . \ '°` j,,h_ •�'sei!i...._� - .. \` pLp. intervals not emodi.I, .vmlW Mn .evil ot• �+T,y;r'• »5%h --,, �( ' - . �, ,,6 LOCH am� ` s yy. µ- ' D�.4--_- a• ��_'s �a.q.. oohed09> \`` al[s ea,mv,av n a/ItW with Mt dIDWd Wlemizm mrt.W_ tel oADDlis!]•1.5.L • `y h C • _ • l� \ ,',"/ I \ . \ C. Iv-nLtdtce �,�-� .EEISTHN:CONCRETE WALLS f:4 ITKFF�+TD E✓=PER ;(aD I d0 BE RENOYED(TP.( ` i` !- "- -"- - \\\ \ tf LLMIC'3pNTE1 POSTS • _ PARK Cc 1 d�,��..¢¢Ya'ai',,,'T.,?,,z Y ,1 - IC' -� ` \ :,.a`wm,vild e M w.f`elev:ifn moo.i;irw ie e.b.;uv�:a'ate lfanpo,ti /L�x r`'3:i ;` LMITSVOF WORK a `\``` va •pa emir a Ww�al,elmust,s.paneatnecno�I12EG1'ION. CY t ♦tiQ ]l 1 Mtenter9 Iry Wn. r`s. \\, \ `\ isIrglnurvals. Nat«d cow of do te he m> • • 7H �,ryJ �� •JTa \ '` nLsttatPoZIS IFIm. tR,ztDpYI1 : e.ik -I •>:' / d' .>n 7die \ \\ `.San Y p,�.e.mad pas. n..ard.l Ws,itm. m pWvna Mm+n > 4 1 \ - \`,1,• • urinal w' mat°."•ie wen a`:mn.a mWmede;:ai•m pt:plaza iw n • �f> "Y o .), '\`t- ~'`• / .90 .pa au _ .` t uvr.el:of not W�tannN•. corner post is remn.ae an.n fiet w ss „�@eJ .)a> ��---- ;MG B / \t� h+ea d na,W en.ng.i dwnn er man. rm ':. >•'6t' io 6E REY 4 _ \ \ tnvv• «mi n%r.ns er fur«and.b..i Ntnpfo m '' '�- ('<. 1 \ •';ac.pt';1a"post roG,hra nMal and W W %/ % 9': • ' v 1 C ' �--� n =_ 4e•.rsr st ms ma LIM.POI Rts SEMI9u OSTS) ' �,g& •�<_ // .J) C�`-� ,i ( w a I:��.L'- _ ..-t- cos t�'� \` • .amo-r Pose.B.pn Pp.t Ewa• fa ter gnus / �.i'. j'�"{D / 1 �\) aA� '. 4 / he • /�•\., - \� -{ • •aoi '• �.�yt'-i_i�.«` Q of xol. of Moll .24. ant erl fit; \\\i pdt \\�\:n 0• J3• >0' S'-1 Tavtnai I o"Y ~�/_ram.-_•\ y� ' t ` ' O •sap `i\ 0,mr•'s loavcte. pain for 10'Iabrlcomctims Wll a rbdded in Se• . 'C tea eem,nma�.fat. a rro a amr•,n.e a ]���� ; �� •Sae !C9 .J, - .39L _ .-99 . 1 i!\ Mntma imssrvn fwtlq Nm 9•anlm Olmnr. ..„:toe t EXISTIN STOCKPILES _' \ \` • yr ,ail / •nZe �F,` t9idR[ • ' v .>\ 7 To Y 2.500 Wt.0 weal,1N gran ell puts n eD.d our. \ _ 1 '- _� feu eN.a gnt.mnafavl>t-r.Dose.Brea.f.D.fnm•ttwm • w evil a f.emed W.,d••r Itne pe.v as maned. .I'c a •' • '„/ -'� rL -•- \ , PO.ee ,e96 S / / /aatMa v tin pot D>tin,nand st Intervat•eI mat urn tlRn N•used • ' ,"v:.� ,:.5 - • • p / f�•cats,1.1 iNmrlc well aMfestered m nth 4n1na1 • ; ;try ;�,� , - , •)9 2 1 Yr NN bands. Tonal...Mil M fasten.by r i^ c �s of hen awes tend aWroanvl)111 ant. fabric rolls he \.` 4..:/5::::^ : r _ I .deg .]9T •),L dad a 7atnd e, awe,.•«W of fWat way.,n Nfam.wvdnuous:•m r 91:ff.a --. I.e. • • y �Fi.:yy;.3yyy j.,;,:� ,erM' t S"„f?.: f,% ,-, .ma's,'. r?nfa•o .�- /l e3f:3 .)e B 9 fual4nc sm +.pmvurM,p n `'v zb',ry .y. D • 3"xv�,Ae r {/, �s-• •1e' •5e9 - rI.rtunas,fnslmamat"mpfmn.l.,,afpnlNeew.wr:faned endm 9 Has,. careful, II.1Ned u • - .:>t • ��// 2 .322 , .x03 �]B'J .n:s • t a ern'. aDOg OMER t�POICE 1 • (_ Io Gt'WN-LIPJK�ENGE F{YDRO5EEi ecs wtLD g, - - e '�/ APPROXIMATE,SOUTH BDRY t. t, �'` ILL'I+E.vERo,HELIX SEE NOTE • MIX(SHOWN SN�OEAy v `• - _ ---- -. ,,)., )e o \ �,� �b.y)z az - N 912L')W 2E CEDAR R / V E RNg II •361 ` If.... C} • -• f r--..,•,;;:\ I hH i 4Fs�29] (� \ 'rA'.' N "93.T;t.¢ - SEE ,..,1 E<SOUTH BDRY -__ -__ J \ �15 .\\`^ •.'`)..\ ___ - • " 'h..:,..x fast!. - <:� • �� ..```� \\�\ \\"'`,',\ \�\ \\ BNDT.LINE EST BY SC DECREE N0. 90072 "------....__` 1 • EXISTING VEGETATION ALON' CITY OF R E N T O N THE RIVER CONSISTS OF GRASSES A I 'I D.r �.•'!' DECIDUOUS TREES,TYP • :�,O LAUGH G.GOLDSMITH&ASSOCIATES,INC. Ol PA FTN6NT oI PUBLIC Wow K■ rQ� r' \ . Consulting Enpinoere•Surveyors Piann.rs t PLAN }or • u ,r�e�/,,".,3``� �, �� �-`J,z y \` `` .'�TONEWAY C ONCRETE INCH»a u B R j `=t `.i c 1,� eGlzi .._ MoPla Valley Hry.Renton WD. 98052 • •�\ ±` 41J'r � * / ,v.�� M.A.�'� .eu r eo ram •9..eaar ' Na.I.,aN 47 AMA 1 isms A... we t aHaat�2-.ors- ; I • ` LR - j_ s• .- - u®It IBA • m0®R 64e1 IV T.. • , - FUTlR1EFD[s+®GRADE \ l • .4� i %. -•-A" vR .------ MITT\a.�\\ a un. txma�e I ¢m40 OP IIDo� 1.0040TBD 111.Rnnm.m M'T.m aOe®r tom a Lva•um To �' 40f. ��.— eLaaaam•m-ammoremarmRrmmrm r �tR:Mznrt.mm ummaTTa.T mtm rm�R.ru 6101170101.9. �.�m®a 60010057 o WaaOJor I' G $` �.I.E.•93.Q3 -- \``• I • ®r:rr�TOOT mmaxaID. tcr�m mvBm�wam�r miasma 'm"�i°m t:mn m AtGTR Hilb Rut • Tam Team 00 as COMM.aRm�Rm 0 m ®tm • N 3 ,,aj� I �,N 3 ? `GNQ- i641=r 9t7 ST `E I 9711012.o>ms`m'tm a cure u MT smarm aWm ��6 m u�mr a mu ua m rmm.n.mm a amn utra s MT. • •� •` •�3aA \ TT[�m�R trR A TRl.m mm.TM 3 - y f�F.ja V Y-y \ _ SECTION Aat• \ Sur..am eaax Tun r®naae etm urea am rranaa m a m m@ av ea.000 , ... ;T • oESILTATION POND • .ti \ a I ta]®mrraml�maurmrammtvaa ' NO SCALE \ a a urmr�aaaTT ms sat memo min m-a rnmc Our num em �_ M.TM++• • ✓ BERM TO OE CONSTRUCTED FOR LONG TEEN EROS,O2/ Qs� a Imu atmal>e t�mm m TAM Ma 111.0000 ®a m,:emir.mn•Arm TM®oT`a'io 51 LOT 0 na nve ter m 611 avmm I� • ti l •`,, ' SELI 14 a*TT CONTROL.A49 HTOROSEmED AS FIRST PHASE OF COM9TiiUCTWYlP `\•\u] \ 02�.R:mar sa91,001u samr n.®an T LOT m mr®za®nm m tmm.,u POI • �YF \ RAT mamm m yam le m R.Ts m rm o.®.m m BM rumTT: \` ` RT7aTI W.[n4 B.I•® 60011 00 rmT 003 T6 LTITIMT BM m SAID 60020 e(9aTNi.T Xm r RAT.Aaa 4mmm10IC70057 mmam6TmwnnmrommeM07210• e- - "SAVE.. _ . •`•, o I.m camAar m o�.n�TTzema Teem m®�meT as - 31 ti_-_ .,z ms nee TO T..22 saID a17 COB LmZ 160 CT.Bar MC/m TO•POTrm a amva �i r-�17-- zoo . „ �\J \ \ \ =on m rRn aT.®T. _ NC._WC_•.a9 m.]...AST.I�POST m a TB em@00m1, m �i • •7�i• e;�m (.. • L llxy me Tim sera BM mm ux C000•omaa m Inu Mt rauaa �' S ▪ T'�`m POW 010090 a"a°m vY°1da tm�"`T 60A°�"°m°azr Bar I:mL]MT TO Ca i ,,.. 4 • � / •\ z.BBMXADJACEEFNTTTOCEDaaRSVlevy. �aA 0003 110 4 _ ' Itl G .�:•`.S11 DERSORO ITSEEDED ED PA�EYEgi PLANTED AS • Tina mom�wto mr tmo.ra • g *•.------ .L fcY---.6Yq• ,4\ ama,mm m-am•CBI To TM�u.n LID oewsem m.auane to m Tn.] I, , 01 . .•. 'i O //' \ .� `. -•'.•.,• !i[81 WATER MAR[ • teat a mm,nw a am zn COMB m im sun 0011130010011 rams . 'a.. . • At?'••I X ATELY ELEVATION 9D ass m smrz a Tasman a NM Ass T®m ciao ma ••ML \`.• Rae 009 m TOrI•T•Tn LL4m•Jlm ma]TO MT 10010 Eta am •!LffiB,ID w w 5 r.._••,e Y.. ,'... .!.\.•: \?\ �.,ED3 CONTOURS FROM AERIAL PHOTO M > !'"..'ry�'`r{'.lt I) \Y//J \41%tarlp•.3I3 TM rmn1MTN10 mm®rsm MOP mma m o®.n®vlmm .s� `\ TRO OTT - 1 t; T 'a Renton III Sl1•.-•'• r•-e v ' _ —.—._ - .4fz ... • . \ ••.si i••\ • eTarTvr SOTTO TcmraTm amt®orm TaBamam amo>aarTm am. 3;. Clem SeT so °O r•n Io m TOT ,,m tram m MITTnnl as®a �e all OP TIT PROJECT SITE. o \ S. \ RATE or KM®oamlr ass SO.Soon m R®tai a I•u.m ewlmcT o 3 a�R �• \ \ Ta Tleus m Tn mama man m Tm a..••10.19 i € u..I. — ..se . a `•• man m T.Mtn `\ ,o .\I m Ts>am,mmlr m®a Sun 01.1120031102 g=ODTVNAP D0O ^ .•ss ••so \ ,JI ..CALF 1'-Izar v. \` \ - li _L -..,�J r•..a..es .as (`_J _ \ `. -•F\ LEQEN9, _ - I( +__ •no AA �~�1i��-���. _ - .. -1.'- \ j� • >.P\ i =EIISTWC SPOT ELEYATpA_ ,I�' �- �- _: riy A \ \. \ - +D--EXISTING cowman }i •/ , //L v e cii*I "�' ; % .<.] `'. �. \ ®.m9mtGcoxrnEreWALLS �L� r + ��a _ - - V iF • ��, • ���i �`-- .Jz. �z' . -`.r// : ',� ---■ �• - ws j s. ``\ O I =®STDZCi OBLONGS 1' _ ,/: EXISTING CONCRETE WALLS ,. ___ / /�iTa ��` \�` `�\ _ l TO BERFMOYm(TTP.) •.�MI6 •�O2 IDOTSOFWOR[ ;�7r�i — •\ \`` \ C -EIDSi@iGCON6RETEPAD9 1 A caa4il'� '� • r• ills r r \�mo \ ra 722 ..aI�7. .az, 4 ` •_Oaf jig .T a 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAN �IWO ` a • \ -ESISigC YE6ETA7ION �� i—' .o \ `. . \ I .270.___rr-1W YEM FLOOD PLAN �`` At ws - .ass % ` / O ,�� _ . - • m\` e\ `-\ --_—®-RIOPoS®C091TOU619 / ' ell y,„,,,,.., , ...._ 4,. 02 • `ram/ .I/o .ao. Jos , ' \ =J=/ .wz I �` `\ `• \ A ENS STOC[PLSS ` \n.�i / • • sss it .asl •�� ••a] �. \�``�`• .• I / t 401 •Atit �T _ _ __ % S6 "_---`__a_ - .Sea 392 Jsa .aoa wzs • •• `\ ` \ 1 �` Y ,�.' _'err ;aI-1_.. �__ali,/ T& .—�- ..... •N7 t • •Jee . ` J' • - ` • • __► s-W - .-�1 '• P . y WE il �.ii .azz ;0• `'�I - .aas 1.-• * .o] \ ` •\ •F NIL TOMA7.• _C —' r-��, :C —�Ti .." a .aes JeJ .asz .i • \• 2401 A`'aPmwl rE :,rN SORT. • — .- _ ` _ •�.. I .. ` 'A1 \\. `� \ SEE M. E •. / ��� \=�I _ • APPROXIMATE LOCATION APPROXIMATE BERM CEDAR R / I/E R `� �` ` ' .Sol I -� 1' `1 ea-• I `ENLTATION POND LOCATION , ,z __. -',e: .F» t • o [Mr •aos t1 L•• SEE E �,� .•' \\\\ } / ___,...A....._ - - .. _ -_. @OBE a I'm @ORX _•a \ i`. •a''.4• •1.5 •ENOS.LINE EST OT Sc.DECREE N0. 8007E \� •.. a"^R - EXISTING VEGETATION AEON' _ CITY OF RE N T O N • THE RIVER CONSISTS OF GRASSES O �I O IIUGHO.GOLDSMITH ASSOCIATES,INC. • O@►A RTN6NT 0/ •uMLIC MORR• t' - (Tit D.• (•LTItg DECIDUOUS TREES,Tr- \ i,• Consulting Engineers•Surveyors•Planner. GRADING PLAN for I '' ,'} , ` ••r,� Ez��/, s, n''.s • \ - -- STONEWAY CONCRETE INC. I�4'' rf r Lug ". (js-jet E g W of Baazl ' � ISMS MODIe Valley Hwy.Renton Wa. 98053 .00 .ctaeo sL,...,., '•eo' •t' ®,.....,,- - - tmTmTAR 0Mora von u>.a. .,.....n,..,.....,,. suasr___A.� AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON,WASHINGTON Audrey Benner A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY y ,being first duly sworn on oath states THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUN- CIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RENTON, WASH- INGTON, ON NOVEMBER 24, 1987, AT VALLEY DAILY NEWS 9:00 AM TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition STONEWAY CONCRETE AND CITY OF RENTON PARKS AND RECREATION Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week.That said newspapers DEPARTMENT Aare legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six fillingg and grading ication ron 3 8 permit acres ofproperto allow y property Y months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published with approximately 53,000 cubic yards of material in order to bring the property to in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King grade with the remainder of the site, and County,Washington.The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal substantial shorelines development permit newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for to allow said fill and grading within 200 ft of Cedar River, File Nos: ECF-005-87, SP- King County. 005-87,SM-002-87. YODER/WEBB SHORT PLAT The notice in the exact form attached,waspublished in the Kent Edition Application 0.79for approval propertyf a four (4) lot subdivision of acres of zoned , Renton Edition X , Auburn Edition , (and not in R-2; Duplex, a variance to allow two pipe reet supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers stem lots;m tsd file waiver PL-085-87,f off-site 8t-87, pp g Y improvements, SH V-086-87, during the below stated period.The annexed notice a and W-087. Property located at 2000 & 2002 Kirkland Place NE and 2010 Kirkland Notice of Public iiearin8 Place NE. Legal descriptions of the files noted was published on November 13, 1987 R2607 • above are on file in the Renton Building and Zoning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSON TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRE- SENTThe full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the NOVVEM B THE PUBLIC HEARING ON gNOVEMBER 24, 1987, AT 9:00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. Sum of $ 32.00 . Published in the Valley Daily News November 13, 1987.R2607 Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of 9,7 e Notary, lic for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, King County, Washington. I�. I __ \` /y VDN#87 Revised 11,86 LV 3l I t Li kizt ov CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director October. 20, 1987 . . Dick Padrick Hugh G. Goldsmith and Associates, Inc. 501 Lyon Building Seattle, WA 98104 Re: Public Hearing, Stoneway Concrete Special Permit 005-87 and SM-002-87 :, ,•' :.. Dear Mr. Padrick: A public hearing before the , City of Renton Hearing Examiner has been scheduled for October 27,' 1987. The public hearing : , commences at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you before the hearing. If you , have any questions, please call" the Building and Zoning °`t• Department at 235-2550. Sincerely, Donald K. Erickson, AICP . Zoning Administrator DKE:DB:csb:dsk2 • LtsStone 200 Mill Avenue.South - Renton, Washington 98055 (206) 235-2540 r �I � 4$ 0 CITY OF RENTON "LL BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director October 20, 1987 Stoneway Concrete, Inc. 1915 Maple Valley Highway Renton, WA 98055 Re: Public Hearing, Stoneway Concrete Special Permit 005-87: and SM-002-87 Dear Sir or Madam: • • A public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner has been scheduled for October 27,: 1987. The public hearing commences at 9:00 a.m. in the Council' Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is ; required to be present at the public hearing. = A copy of 'the'. staff report will be mailed to you before the hearing. If you have any questions, please call the Building and Zoning' '' Department at 235-2550. Sincerely, Donald K. Erick n, AICP _ Zoning Administrator DKE:DB:csb:dsk2 LtsStone 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 5 ai `' .' CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director October '20, 1987 Larry M. Brown Western Pacific Properties 13975 Interurban Avenue S. Seattle, WA Re: Public Hearing, Stoneway Concrete Special Permit 005-87 and SM-002-87 ~;_ r. Dear Mr. Brown: :. q.,!Oi, A public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing -Examiner. ,>>,, has been scheduled for October 27, " 1987. The public hearing commences at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant =is';°„`';ay_,';;�`q:a, required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed• to you before the- hearing. - If you - ,:v3: have any questions, please call the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2550. ' S• erely, Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator ; DKE:DB:csb:dsk2 LtsStone • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 41) `� •,tY' 1rC,�i'` M CITY OF RENTON WNW 'A BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director 1 October 20, 1987 Jane Ryan Koler Casey, Pruzan and Kovarik 18th Floor ep ,. ,•r,. Pacific Building Seattle, WA 98104 Re: Public Hearing, Stoneway Concrete Special Permit 005-87 and SM-002-87, Dear Ms. Koler: A public hearing before the City of Renton" 'Hearing Examiner* ,1 •'`'' has been scheduled for October 27, 1987. The public hearing ; commences at 9:00 a.m. . in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. The applicant or representative(s) of the a.,' . required to be qu present at the public. hearing. � A copy of the ``'•',;_.;�;�...:. staff report will be mailed. to you before the hearing. If ,you y have any questions, please call the Building and Zoning, ... Department at 235-2550. ' Sincerely. :. A , E1L___ Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator e . DKE:DB:csb:dsk2 LtsStone . 200 Mill•Avenue South- Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 OF RA, 0 THE CITY OF RENTON U t$ 0 z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 meli. rn o BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH. MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER ,0 `O FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 o947. SEPS-���P MEMO RAN D U M October 26, 1987 TO: Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator FROM: FRED J. KAUFMAN, HEARING EXAMINER RE: Stoneway Concrete SP-005-87 Dear Don: Per phone conversations this date with the applicant' s representative and yourself, the hearing in the above entitled matter will be continued to a date in late November or December. As I understand the request, it was based upon the fact that the applicant was not made aware of the hearing date in a timely fashion. If you have any questions feel free to contact this office. cc: Mayor Shinpoch OF RA, �� ó ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT - o RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR imIL 09 ^ MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 0,9T�0 Sc_10 SEP BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR MEMORANDUM DATE: October 22, 1987 OCT 221987 TO: Fred Kaufman, Hearing Examiner �'� (� � NER HE�►'RIfVIG EXpiVIINER FROM: Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: Stoneway Concrete Preliminary. Plat Report for October 27, 1987 Attached are corrected copies of the Stoneway Concrete, Inc. report to you for the public hearing on October 27, 1987. In order to get you your three copies by 5: 00 PM on Tuesday, I was unable to proofread the report. Since that time I have done so and found a number of minor, but annoying, typos. Under the "Recommendations" section, a provision on Item 2 . requiring a monthly report of findings to the City's Zoning Administrator was left off. Apparently reports, when they are done, have been going to the Building Division and have not come to my attention when things go awry. Item 3 . regarding landscaping replacement was only intended to apply to ,the area along the western property line between the park and the Stoneway Concrete site. If you have any questions, please bring them to my attention immediately. Than J DE:de Att Fl ciivo.de46 • I BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING October 27, 1987 APPLICANT: Stoneway Concrete, Inc. and City of Renton, Parks and Recreation Department PROPONENT: Dick Padrick, Hugh Goldsmith & Assoc. s FILE NUMBER: SP-005-87 LOCATION: Located south of Maple Valley Highway and north of the Cedar River at Stoneway Concrete, 1915 Maple Valley Highway, and Cedar River Park. A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: Application for special permit to allow filling and grading on approximately 3.88 acres of property with approximately 53,000 cubic yards of fill material in order to bring the property to grade with the remainder of the site. B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record: Stoneway Concrete, Inc. and City of Renton 2 . Applicant: Stoneway Concrete, Inc. 3 . Existing Zoning: H-1, Heavy Industrial (Stoneway Concrete) P-1, Public Use (Cedar River Park) 4. Existing Zoning in the Area: P-1, Public Use; H-1, Heavy Industrial; M-P, Manufacturing Park; G-1, General-Single Family 5. Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Recreation-Cedar River Park Commercial-Stoneway Concrete 6. Size of Property: 3.88 acres (Stoneway Concrete and City of Renton combined site) 7. Access: Maple Valley Highway 8. Land Use: Stoneway site - developed industrially and undeveloped in southwest corner of , site. Cedar River Park - developed Municipal Park. 9 . Neighborhood Characteristics: North: Undeveloped hillside and future commercial north of Maple Valley Highway. East: Industrial, commercial and multi-family residential 51.4j1-A Jo*. (,,t) "0 , . (—1 Building and zoning Department Preliminary Report t- the Hearing Examiner Public Hearing ' Stoneway Concrete October 27, 1987 Page 2 South: Undeveloped, future park site and extension of the Cedar River Trail West: Municipal river front park C. HISTORICAL/BACKGROUND: Action File Ordinance Date Original townsite 1909 Original P-1 and H-1 zoning 1953 D. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1. Utilities a. Water: A twelve-inch water main is located north of the site along Maple Valley Highway and a six-inch water main is located in Cedar River Park. b. Sewer: A major sewer trunk line runs east and west along Maple Valley Highway and through Cedar River Park. c. Storm Water Drainage: Storm water on the site currently drains downhill naturally to the south into the Cedar River. 2 . Fire Protection: Provided by the City of Renton as per ordinance requirements. 3 . Transit: Metro transit routes #143 and #912 operate along Maple Valley Highway. 4. Schools: a. Elementary Schools: N/A b. Middle Schools: N/A c. High Schools: N/A 5. Recreation: Cedar River Park is located directly west of the subject property and the eastern portion of the park is included as part of the subject special permit application for fill and grade. Directly south of, the site along the Cedar River is the proposed "Natural Zone" of the Cedar River Trail system, a linear river park that is undeveloped at this time but will eventually link to the developed phases west of I-405. E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1. Heavy Industry District (H-1) , Section 4-713; and F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT: 1. Industrial Goal and Objectives, Policies Element, City of Renton • Comprehensive Plan Compendium, January , 1985, pgs. 18 and 19. 2 . Community Facilities Goals and Objectives, Policies Element, City of Renton .Comprehensive Plan Compendium, January, 1985, pg. 24. 3. Section 4. , Goals and Policies, Renton Shoreline Master Program, December, 1983, pg. 14. Building and Zoning Department Preliminary Report t he Hearing Examiner . Public Hearing Stonewa'y Concrete October 27, 1987 Page 3 G. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1. Stoneway Concrete and the City of Renton Parks and Recreation Department applied on January 27, 1987 for a special permit to allow the filling and grading on 3.88 acres of property with approximately 53,000 cubic yards of material in order to bring the property to grade with the remainder of the the site, and a Substantial Shorelines Development Permit to allow said fill and grading within 200 feet of the Cedar River. 2 . The Environmental. Review Committee considered this item on May 13, 1987, June 10, 1987, July 29, 1987 and September 23, 1987 at which time on this last date it finalized its Determination of Non-significance - Mitigated of August 23, 1987. During this period considerable comment was received from the applicant and the Committee reconsidered its previous decisions on at least two occasions and modified conditions in response to these and other commenting parties. 3 . As provided in the Zoning Ordinance, the Hearing Examiner may grant a special permit to allow the drilling, quarrying, mining or depositing of minerals or materials on a site 4. Before granting a special permit, the Hearing Examiner is asked to make a determination that the activity would not be unreasonably detrimental to the surrounding area. In doing so the Examiner is asked to consider, but not limited to, the following: (1) Size and location of the activity; The applicants are requesting a special permit to increase grades over the subject site by approximately 5 'to 7 ' for the purpose of improving the overall efficiency of their operation which is the storing and mixing of ingredients for the making of concrete, as well as the storing of the trucks used in the delivering of this material. They have stated that this is not a speculative fill. In a letter dated January 20, 1987 the Parks and Recreation Department stated that "the filling of the Stoneway property would adversely affect the park from a visual and noise standpoint if the ,,existing use is maintained. " That department was also concerned that filling of the 3.88 acre site might adversely affect downstream properties, including the Cedar River and Liberty parks. The proposed fill would require approximately 3,000 truck loads of new material to be brought to and deposited on the site. Staff do not believe the size of the proposed action is necessarily a major issue if traffic and timing, so as not to disrupt the adjacent park, can be worked out. A bigger issue is location, particularly as it relates to the proximity of the proposed fill to the Cedar River. Since the City has purchased an easement for the expansion of its Cedar River trail system across the river from the subject site the issue of what effect the fill would have, aesthetically speaking, on this public improvement was raised. Initially the applicants were proposing to fill up to the edge of the Cedar River. Staff and the State Department of Game and Fish have sought the development of a landscape buffer between the proposed fill area and the river's edge to create a strong visual buffer between park and trail uses across the river and heavy industrial uses,.:. as well as to reduce potential erosion problems and to help create a water's edge habitat conducive to the maintenance of wildlife. (2) Traffic volume and patterns; As noted above, the proposed action will necessitate approximately 3,000 truck loads of new fill material being transported to the subject site. The Traffic Engineering Division, however, did not raise this as an issue. Once the DU11U11L( Gt11U L uL11i1y uepctL L.iLLeI1L. Preliminary Report t- '-he Hearing Examiner Public Hearing Stoneway Concrete October 27, 1987 Page 4 subject fill is in place there is not expected to an increase in traffic volumes over the activity level currently associated with the' site. (3) Screening, landscaping, fencing and setbacks; This is a major issue for this site. As already noted above, Staff are very concerned about the need to create a strong visual buffer between this heavy industrial use and the Cedar River Park next door, as well as the proposed Cedar River trail extension across the river. Also, for the record, it should be noted that the City has looked at the Interpace site directly across the river as a potential expansion area for city activities in the future if other sites in the immediate area do not become available or prove to be too costly. Though the likelihood now is low, the City could be creating a situation that it will have live with later on as an overlooking neighbor. The Environmental Review Committee was also concerned about this issue and imposed a 30 foot landscape buffer/erosion control setback from the Cedar River, for the fill material. It also sought berming and soil retaining landscaping in front of any ecology block retaining wall the applicant might use to retain the, fill material. The ERC also required the applicant to replace landscaping that currently exists between the Cedar River Park and the Stoneway Concrete operation. Because of the potential danger to children playing around parked trucks on the Stoneway site, the Building and Zoning Department did issue a shoreline exemption to the applicants to install a temporary fence to keep kids off the subject site. Staff are recommending that a permanent cyclone type fence be constructed along the west edge of the subject site, east of the landscape buffer after the filling is completed. 4 ' (4) Unsightliness, noise and dust; The current operation is not necessarily compatible with the existing uses to the west or those proposed across the river. It should also be noted that the Cedar River's south bank is designated as "conservancy" just east of the proposed fill site. . The Environmental Review Committee was concerned enough about the potential adverse impacts of noise and dirt arising from the proposed action to require that the hours of filling be coordinated with the Department of Parks and Recreation. Likewise, the 30 foot buffer and requirements for additional landscaping to create a visual screen along the river's edge as well as between the Cedar River Park and the Stoneway Concrete, Inc. site, are an attempt to address the unsightliness issue, both of the proposed fill, as well as the heavy industrial operation itself. (5) Surface drainage; The Environmental Review Committee, as well as Staff, have concluded that the applicant's plans for creating sedimentation ponds, siltation control fences, and hydroseeding are adequate for the duration of the proposed operation. These, however, should be monitored on a regular basis to ensure the proper operation throughout the life of the permit. This is particularly important because of the potential adverse effects to the Cedar River, which is a known salmon spawning stream. (6) The length of time the application of an existing operation has to comply with non-safety provisions of this Ordinance. This section does not appear to be applicable since there is no currently authorized fill or grading allowed on this portion of the site. Building and Zoning Department Preliminary Report t he Hearing Examiner . , Public Hearing Stoneway Concrete October 27, 1987 Page 5 H. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION: Based upon the above analysis and discussion, it, is recommended that the subject special permit application, file SP-005-87 be approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant comply with the mitigation measures requiredrby the Environmental Review Committee on its Determination of Non- significance - Mitigated,for this application; 2 . That the applicant contract with a certified environmental engineer to monitor the erosion control devices and quality of surface water and drainage runoff on a monthly basis and report said findings to the City's Zoning Administrator for the duration of this permit; and 3 . That the applicant replace all landscaping along the boundary between the Cedar River Park and subject site with comparably sized and typed materials, to the satisfaction of the City's landscape architect, as well as erect a six foot cyclone fence along the west property boundary of their site, prior to occupancy of the subject site. • • • 4 _�!'•c• lL�----- - x -. - --_-_ 'ram----- - _. .. ';-� !�If/• — .-.y-Y ti"- -- yr -."` —�`w� _ • : : - _:I ; -i. 4111111"110' I1tr, Y t •-�i°-_ -,J �r REV 5 is 'f'�t RION ST 7/ !/ !/,'(a. s . w_ lit- r dr 1 -,0 .1. .: .ktg , ;. . 4?-!, .,:sq::.00.1, '/- . '1 i ./ j,a_ , .\- ;-',,.. , w N I ir-1 ,i I ,� Pm -1 . ›-F47 Tv ,:' e 1 i/i 1-.- 424.- -LI—. i. :-:tr:,;ti''' Al MP' /. t,' 0 L-2J , .ILI .: t-v.I. . ,...-. lqi,, .,.,m,i, - ,_ igt, ; _ .::/ ,/ , lliao ' '-'' ' • -, .,beno , ;� 1, -J 5. ant L.-•' 9 E� ''; / - al al , �'� / Y I it�•_— ill• !{yr • cry,. .\ 'j, I IM} e ft W ` , • r ; 1.i i ,-' 1.wel; .;;, ,.\...„..,: , o e 4' , - . . v,V.P' 40, / /I/ Q r g m CEME TE p J —0 :V i� PARK \ o CEDAR RIVER � i z// ` Jl._' ,��,' ® 1 3.2 / PARK \ . i ' 91'1112 P 1i1\ / :- 7pY f l2 ; Qc , t (f� `` r / / j �__� - ' ,\ Sear ecli `./ q5, .. ail .. ,,, J/cif— . 1 1_ ,,,:, I•. t s,\ -14,,,,): , ::j HALL ,,,,:,,„,,,,„ .,,,,:, ,...,_ --_-:=-;.,. _7:-.- ,,,44 , „_,„ i , . i . - , I � 17f ♦ ",I •\ I �,1 : ,. A , ,...:::::14s444......: . Ma . r ! '; * H \\ '\. ,N , T iiii N\4,r4,B ,.I : x , I. -I�' �Q�t� STONEWAY CONCRETE and CITY OF RENTON • d•`' / PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT. - SPECIAL PERMIT: SP-005-87 - STONEWAY CONCRETE and APPL I CANT CITY OF RENTON, PARKS DEPARTMENT TOTAL AREA 3.88 ACRES PRINCIPAL ACCESS MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY EXISTING ZONING H-1 .(STONEWAY CONCRETE), P-1 CEDAR RIVER PARK - EXISTING USE STONEWAY CONCRETE-INDUSTRIAL, CEDAR RIVER PARK-RECREATION PROPOSED USE INDUSTRIAL USE-STONEWAY CONCRETE, RECREATION-CEDAR RIVER PARK • COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN COMMERCIAL-STONEWAY CONCRETE; RECREATION-PARK COMMENTS THE APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT TO ALLOW FILL AND GRADING ON • 3.88'ACRES WITH. 53,000 CUBIC YARDS OF MATERIAL IN ORDER TO BRING THE PROPERTY TO 'GRADE WITH THE REMAINDER OF THE SITE. LOCATED AT: 1915 MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY'. -• ..-.... ' .•.7- .....70._C ,. . #0.1-»;•''' • ._., vg lt I.." , IN ,. . .,k 1,,-,o,... . • -,4.• A.,1„- --1,-k.....4...- % L , ...,;; ' • . '••'4:5-.1- 1 • ?_ i 1.r- ....0.,:•1:, ••• 4,471,, ,•:,*- : I . • --- , . ........."•!!!..1 ..:„...„..-41:::.::.:.:2. '...4i....c.").., 4,.. w LAND USE ELEMENT , , 0P-,,,;:si:.:.:ti::::::.. ......„..ette., ..,.fl 0°0' .::fr.•:::: P.V,....,f& ,•• , ..o 0,rtoq......:::•:::, . Elk lt,.. •:... ..c.,.,,.. • 1 . • - tir -.Z.:K. - -'f'Ts'F-6. Single Family . i. • , Commercial IIA ig .. .:::. PR_ ....,.•• _..,:::•.4.•I i .......---••-.... , ' 7 I .311 hirer :•• ••••• .:- . I--.-. 4 i s xxN, .•do•0 0• ': i•is-s ,,00000, .6,..,:. ,..,,.4 :I, I :a Low Density \‘‘ Office / Office 'park 1 '",.°§6vorQ:::ii1,4'(1111 0'4 MI•11 .•. * ::•:•:•:•:':•:•::::: .•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•.••• Multl-Family ..N ..,„.., ,,a,:,.-..., , •:•:•:•:•:•:•:•::::: moll ' 1 • :.:•:•:•:::::: • •••••• ,'.'',..1.1•MEN IIC•" '- •'i:::i::::i::::i:i:i:i::i:i::::i:i:i:i:i:::::::: MedMiuuml tDi-eFnasmit ,...000000.00.000.00.., Public/Quasi-Public t-rryi:mo A,7i"sv;,la`••-•-a-,l.-N.ms E.I.,,,,''::*::•:it:::i.::::Ci:s-*:.::::.1%r•g.•r,,a,•••i,4.,,,.,i.ri.a,z.,a.j,.,jE."..Ar4;.,, •aM..,•a•vl..••, ,•, 11 MINI MI.,,. High Density Multi-Famiiy 1:::::: Light industrial 11 .... - Stn.'er,2:t0 •x , • . .,.,Recreation ,G.00,0,30• ,r. a io o e . , .• Heavy kidustrial •• ,..:.• - . 1111110 s' nk, tit • • •n I, ' • %lilt : .. i Greenbelt '-'• ,:-....Per E 0 ik Manufacturing Park 4 ------ 'Pd. ainkfilsiss, , ' 1 / Multiple Option .• _ ..._ , .0.... :.:•:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:::::.:::::x: 00:5.000 0" w• •• toitsvg, N 4, '•r41u i,i^.i.i.i.,'I. t'tNO..L.Ie11EM k.,,'gO•ggoZ,'oci0tg,‘E;;og0‘,gg5E.og0.'gS•45o.g0gg.‘gl‘agg0dgggdg4g0gg00ig;0)g.t.4,gi,k•'.-,-t'..•Revised IM1*:M April .- 1985; .,.1 1:g..k ht.i•,'•e..:z..:.,.:i::..p:t;%,,•:„,,::.:•,..;p,,.::i!m!...?.,.:*,:,.i••„•t,•;.*„,?:I,,.•,,i:i;„::'..i.i,.:e!,,•:,-,,,•0-,••..ci0..-....-.:.•,,'.::::*.:-.:.:i.:;..•.:i:.;.::i..-:i....:0:.,..:.*:..:.,.:..::..,.:.::::,.:7::::i:i::::,qi:::::i,.::.:,:::..::i&:..:,ii..;::.:::x.:,i:•:::i:g:,i:,:•.::::„i:::0:.:„:::::i:,:i:,:i..„:,.i:M,:::::i„i::i..i:::i.„i:•i:A.i:,*ii:,:„7:i-i„:•.ii:i.:i,:,:.',,,r.5-P•...,cc000:i0PO4.0.00iiO3:,K0.0000o.F0•.0c00i a-000c0:.-0 i0904A.°00s,-:.0°000 i.0:00"i_00°0o.0000.i.00°0o..0.00_0.,,.4000°00.0o00,0_s,?0°0:.0,......,0F.....o..0.0_...7.•0.o.0.0,..y.00o-•.0.00.0•„.o00_3 i 0g . „ e '1 2n? gogogogo0000 # . '04I11::Yri/lk -.. .000000000000.o.°0•3 0..F00 700..00• 00o00-,0.o0000-,•0.°000,0-..t%00.000,.:09•,:.00.00:_30°000000.00.0._..0f...•:, ..•.‘.:•3 .!.,.:. , ; liiiii:1707CA4-4'1 *I.'' ' :NINIM:4-11(4031111FX". '1::t;r;°..°'14 iiiili.14" 11111:Pri) ifr:‘ It,41f; ::P°0°°°°°°°:::°.0 i .0°07_0°0;o°00,09 Coo°00,000.0°.0•0:00,00:000:000:0000°0000°000:00:00%.:;i!,.1 i (E•• •i:,^..:•i:^:.::.i:.:•::i:::•:..:::.::...:.::.:. -7.7/,.0000o0o0o0o0000: ...t, ' ,:.6.. k:°•°P.°0°0°7.;,ri .,....,. '-.41•F':11111r, ririaltik\:02..90%0°20°080 "P..•ilii siiiiiiiii%_„a„c'"/41.• C'' ' PC i .* • ••'7•"%ii '•'.Vi , 11.11.10.4, •°0'-'0°0-0°0°, ,a,•11miallaillar-,\-v,i;eri •, ,f6ii,:*:•, ..cm, 4•''• . • . k..,. . faeg ie.,. • o o o 0 0, iv•ume•ii•eire,-•,1 -N„, ,,f,nr -ta„ .9,-,14 4••. , c::1 m.„.:...: ..:.:.:.:,............... ...,.. . .. ,.. . . .... ' 411111111"1"111111.1 MIK"'V". ,M2/11ritr'''' '7-7-nall121111\11:2:2111;'4..VC;''.014air. 14:.4ed!‘tik..'''r •.:11;04 ; , •.,/t : 0::Mira r.07,• •-•,„ 4'07'11,11,7•48.41:,,•••'..0; qiNi ''' ii:iiMiiii: -::. ‘r.c.gar .tg:iio'f'd.'1.&./:.!5• ?., : rril&WI.IIIET!!!. r,' '-• '1...,, , .., -' ,•?•,.. 'i, .-- ,...'',',..ie!?.,•,,,%pivA.i l'o'eh•q;•9.3.-/1••• • usiiii........r.....1....10..54 3,3c1.:,.;.s, .„,..„,,e, .. , _ „...,,,,y),,,,.,..„,. .4.. „...).,. A,;co'rJ vj)..4;,... ,i.d..-+4,•,,..M.,. •:::';'.,. _\,.... Iv 710, LO NI II 1.0KX•Mipll IMBUES.i 2 1.•••.a i ), sn,lii,40,....),e,Q.,?;,.;?;,.:(.1)7.13)`;.no.,.•4)d!jeq3.c...;),....?;,,n..,- ' '•-` •,•1011.e.(N:1• •NZ004.1.1..U''op fP,A. ?',..)'Al!el, ',,',i.;:.•,14;art'rar 0,r,13:",r, .11i111:4,7 0;0..4. • ..... Amsm.• .0 q 4,,211.,r-•.••eio'''''• ,' 0'A*0,1!. o f, • • --0,,,,,, ,.., •,:.•,..r• •Im ow, . C''' .^0 (,. \,• ' '4"',,. •.4°,`,..4-„, .•i.:71:2;;..1 • 11, tntnnn4:::i4:- •6..,1 . •, ..,,,,,,,,,, , „,,.. ... ,..,,,,,i„, .„..., , x.,..„.„ , •.......,............,.. „ .•.,.., , , ,,,...„, -„, Nippo, „,,,„ , ,,,.,...i 1,,,, ..,„::N::.. , 'j•-- •.:‘ -R,,i`n.".•...44.....4°.' 44,'-ut!!!!K.,,,,-,-- - ,',• ;%•-•,. ••.r.21te . , .,...:4s.,:,.::..::::- nr, if.„ •,.;;;:- ,Tf,' V.,. Iv,,..:,/..; 1",. ...(5 „iti.,, . .., .. 484., tolti, ,', . i,.',,,,, ie= 1, s,t• k• i:IMIMMAEA:is .0( prill '' ''' ii, - - - -:..;,,,:l!,:',;;;...,,,,''''4"' .4,,, , *. -- 114, 114-,... VAR,•-•.,,,, 1 NCF------------ ti.x..1 ,,t 114:00,wsii.., ,o, ,,ir .711 ..•••••••,c,,, ...;ii.:.',.;t''''T,C3' .71.‘•2'•.•).• 7.:1;We.;•10•;..1, ..*''4Z;••4•z ' '''.11e'c' i3 +4111;COMNSM,Wj.L ia,4 .-, i:` f.,: •-, ;.,?0,,,1*.',i;,..;;;'•;;;''',):!..rfr:::.?„',.,0,7',,,,s.,,?..,yolpi.,,. ,„,.‘ ,-7••• •„..4111"c-) ItcrEE--, ,----- ,•••,,m:g;:•::xw:ii.,a•isen,,,,. . ,- ii ••••• .1) . (4„4,,i.q....ft...5‘y?..0.i.!-.Lt2,. ':..,,,,.. .,... -Tre___--imee..1•;e22A-rt.--.-.1-'4,--;,, 1 i .v.000000000000000000 - ..gi,i):`,..2:1C:::`,T6::;?•0,''''',:,;:i''q:'..;•'1•?>Pi TAII^: ----2-- `,.' z'-41! momme... i• 1 'c'og• -_ --- 11 ' i 'goo *.ne-0,,00000., ",,,•..ip,h,...,4,,•,(4,•,.P. .,s,./1 I in, 'n 44 • „ orci,,,,Lb;,, 04 i •00,, , me( . ; ..(3,.'e.`.1,'",'ve•ir:!:°,..0,,,se,:c..e1)./..il,;:"(7,.....Z0,•,.3 w,P,r. .(' .4., "N:\e, 1:05,,s oo r...1 o NE ;, 'i,Po. ,• 0:CA IX 51' :;P.,'-•:(%($‘:°-//:''41,."0.040.- • ' I N 9 . I y,Iniii • i' III P ^. ' . •• •-rcer..eflt _ .0;,r1.:‘',„4'4,y.',4•••if.'ol.o.,•,,c4.).01'Qs•:,$•....cia,t, tio,,.,.,0•0'ta.; ...,,, .0.,V,. ,1?),,,, m ------- -=- MP-aila- . . i• I ocs•--.....--:.' , . t• I 1 • ,,1. . ., ,,,.0,0 1. ,010. 0 J , 0,,L,,:.•Is, . " % :n .1, • •if•q1 WI. st.n.P.°••'4,(:?'•, ‘,.',,V'',q,a t I,E.)Ny•:Z;u..•,••,.0,...o 0,041. t ....-....-_- I.,- _-_-_-_-_-:- M mi• -•-••. .1. .,,,,'' .:;:;:':::.:.... "c,0 . u.v•:,,,•,.yo<,,•.,%.. i,.•,.•.4 4,. ,. ?g.n.,.jz3,v>...A.. hp..,,, .,,,,,,,,,,,,tity:0%,%,,,„ ,, :7:-:- --1-- -----L- _,,,,..:::-:.:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.:%:•. "...15vii.l:,4,V4A:r:1 0,0.0:. 'ELI•4.,rdr#"I.' '4:...i'ol,...) 11C:71u•it.1:51•\''?::,e•101::•':,o70..1;4.‘11°-•V: -TIV-re'•;t4-4.• 101"_••••1 _IIALl 4 I or"s..•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:, ,:.E.:::,, eq.lp.••••':,-''e, .,000000000.._ ,.4.s ' .•::.::-...--.:............ •t,AI.,..,'•tq,•16,,,; ,9 0 1' ' :,‘,.,,•:•:•:•:•:•:•:. ..:›N"4,9t... .k5•,I ..:•:"%a.:iiiiiigingialliP7,:•sv,;;;i.f., , . ,o., *.°,0°00°00°00.: ' ‘,...::::,:„„„„„„,„„„„„„„„:,,,,,,,,.,„:„,,.,,„ ........„,, ........„,„:::.:.................,i.. , ..,...., . 1....,...t.,. ..00000000. ...:4„::\00,0,. t•-.,-i...„iy:z.,,,,4.1v:!•••,4:13 z,'.. 0,..t.• I ...........4.?.., -:- -.... ••"1- .1':::::::i:K:Mia:::,:::i::::*•r4 ,01,.. .t o .t• .` .•••-'-------Nt,we AN h,j4k............... ............ , ...".4.. 0° '„,..fN. ...::::::::.::::::.:.:.:::::::..:. - . „...„ „..... , ,s,.• . - ,.000001,0.•ti: .. .8!,3 o 009)0*•• _-_------_---_- --- • ! ,.. Nr,.44v:-.., ',:.'• , -1 -c,f 0• ..4;,,,,;•:.•E .t'9 C.'•1 low 1 0., •;.:i::.,..,..,.,t,. .:, N. •• ,,,,n., ,...,,,.: .-0-..• vow Ma .., -------- ----------I c'3 ..... 1 '93 ':::::::::.•.- ..„'? gm'.1‘ - -------A1P-7-Ma ---------I ---, ilk L-- - ---- --------- •'.."- Mr I 'eo°0.• :: i:ii:::•. ,4 ) 1 .. .• A le, 1,\71). *.•;.0-.,., pi . ..9cucro .-'47 00000 1 ., . -a,a -•. I o000000000. i NEI <1 -_ ••_ •000---_V..19 414 ,°°09°. i'0, .::Miii::..3.!Ais .4 a , p .4",,,,,, ay a',., _-__- _-_-_-_- •0 0 0:-•-_- 1 1•$:'.•.,• ..., .,,,.., eid:o.o o_o_o_... Ems, _ _ ____ o 0 00.___.^: t„,„.. :IT .999. Uiiii*::::::...41.1%., •,zpi .00....0%, • 'if:::::: ••:/•..: •",9. , ,ggi . ...,. ,, ,.::.:.iiiii::::,: i:ii::.. •"....,;:.? vow '44, ' ' ... MEM 1.• g...5.•:::.?".., '.:::::::::•.;;.o.o.o..-•..3 ta.• : .oc'Jo':To°0. It: . mast,.••',...., .TIMIDEIW WitainellMN 11M,.'.^,t,.,. ,000000 0 14.•, : :::..:i:i:.0:0:4:0000000.' -...!.*, 1 • •00000• I ,,.r1 11 141 I mimi 0.' ,:•:•:•:,00.00000 -4••• 000000 a r.,.., ______ ________ _______ _ ..c.,,. .. .0000000000000.•.:err ,i .0000000000000- •,.3.:..4. EI -- ----- 1 140140 11111 :r;-_-tiltif .1-_-__ ,...A. •0000:, '47 :', •000000. .o . • 1.' -W = =7-71-7; 4 I P 7:8 1 I:7'----- 1;:;.:. ill .17•,5' r,„ t?VA% o• .1 -------- ----,, 1 ,,, ?.,..,:.,,.._, ?.._ri....„ ___ _________ ____ .,:„ ..:ID,e. is, 'J, :::' , , . •000000• 9 ,, Po t i 12 • :••:; . a • t 1 (IIN OF lit I ' . 111,•k 1111,,\ ' 0 0 0 111.1 •0 0 C.. 111.0,0.0.1 ilium _-_-_--_-_-_------ -----•-; r I -_-_ __ °I 41‘1411.\ 1111.111111111111111111.114 N I-_-:-:-:-:-: .=-:-.:-.= --=----------7•• ---:-L. , 1 ••••• , .i*::.,::V::,::::.:.,,•-- ......•.. . 01111111h, ..•*Al IIM•III, • "-••••••" 111111111M. III ii& '', ----•••••, ---- -.'---- 4:1;:::•• .0000• -•- . .,,,,,,,,,,---,--____"•:•,•-".....211.•..., ,,,- \\\1141111.,:..vovILTs____K PHI_ N I ,0,3, 47 ; ,,••!*1-.7±:13111.440W2." 111•1111111111110r .:'' ------,_-_-_-_-_ -_-_,,-,".... 4 •1.1 I r.:0000000000000000000000000•A ,,..4..0.: .). •. lb..r.,A ..„,,v,1". , ' .;, - 'F K.\ • • 4. 110412164 :4‘ 14\- .1 -i 1, .00000000000000000b 4,,...1. it. , P r: . #111 : • •1 i 1 1000000000000000.•/..,; ••.;;..:.:14,, /,.„ '• 'la- I • :-:-...---07/1-66--2-:-:7: ranid' •0000000000000010"1.•.-•;,,, .,-,_.I.1 ei/X:2•. o \. .limill •!0:0:05:0°....• •.•;.:'.•*/.:::::. ?"..11111„,,,, o•':,..t.,"?. n . . ) , ,, , ._ _ , -_ _:,-,,.. .. ..... ..--..74,.. ,•e".-......,- .,-.o• :::::::p. .:39."13%;• ipEN. ,,-..---.. t�. d ' I • F../)• ei Qpry • ' l� NtWaSIE1 PIl t� Pala..ffAC/ ., .. Afor f�s" &.�' I Dravida W foli.lep: ' !J MOM ilea faLL0V190: -.!t° "a'� ST_. A. MAGI a•\ \ A. DESCRIPTION m Ala ROM POSTS 4 sr ale I e t = •_1 M,�:-� • Z000 1N:per acre of 411a•ilbn•Iwnham.r)a*Gal. • - gN or p M..fencing me still be Ma NI fete,rent.shall to r...INNS at less tN•S.N 1I ..L.,. • '"TT It, STUMM ,Y�y\ ma Nt[s mN,m wen. 9otrm finale of vane.stilt pe 12 leer MM. '`\\ \ ',m too Irtaa alnico.bens preg0. xa pies(w ram,Imatlw. alit Dares xtori • (j a Ndis Pnik i _cs t CO 1N.a-Lc per.u.. \I \`` _ IR•0.0.ntgnlna not icon than sans 1M.pm L.f. • - - -m - r]111,3 3 2 �,T 3`r d'1 ,� i S C. 10.20 rant 1l. *Ton.plan.feN. ¢pill•t•cat.•F!0 W. "- POST RYES - • -_ J NCI. f �• D. LEI.E¢Rt YllpitQa!IBS ° S. PaTF➢lus - .say Nall be I-!/e• 0.0. and.aeon not less cam 2.n lb. per 11na1 f4Z '• pe q• •• mhrY \ •em mod fe uen man fabric,mats and.Ins of W v ll' 11 7,21• ., •J/Cedar Rim,:_ ti' M i <.:N .,,�17 �'.L,L� \� LM sex Ns..rrm OAn pmin sqA Comas.Dona OTNm Son 36u._Castro nlgna roxruw can u0u1..qan wtl W msNrG m p+wlem Nla. ID �'!3 Wily,41 .is Nx6 (a151..-east. RS.Dg Dn Donne. ra• •9,q 2qD .� ; Q' , _ \,'\2, ' •All pasts am ban,s...all be eot-dlpae Wm.. Tb°r cull ham • A1� ts far chain 1.fen.wit N/Mess.....ea galmnized •ST -m���e r CF 169�I I P �L - p� \ \ \ ;nua',p 1.i'0.1 east beim ion;than 1.2 sousre lI Imomat.i`°preen area Cr..vs•nl or•tmf®cop m barb boat designed to•aelu,a g1aWn. > . _. .4 O \ s scot or au ,•n.' m W c.°I sorts�ir ,q, M1a mare .7161 GPS 'j� �jo \� Q I 1 J i , t •1•' ° G� ``\ ••\ • `non! i`e°ell�coating g ileNfixrd as e. Inm tee.cut Imo each emlv.I. tlrmltc Might boBa..ar be ro to bot Nre t�v a von• non '�. Vq: `{ NiA I \o \ • \and .galavanic.etas.m.°0 fit.,seta to me Pardo°:•.11 ale. atttdv to costs by`nem.of Una.Oa. haw Mt to:,°"s.14'. ain°,. ® a ..--- .GLE �' // n \\.11v. '°pals.`Mbar ariois accordance i irrdan a Os Mtn nlrea oe mt.apsci of AMR elm AIM. s.. n N provided for caw re post w as Nos for pan and corner i m CrZ-(I'T- I :1473 X f•\ \ '. ,rAS¢ic\ - TFEI01 aAM . O t •,. / ..N2 (/ ` •All In lint fabric.N11 consist of.martial Nailer atnl w,. elpmd Nava..steal union bands.11 be pre..MO tension w m L 1�•a •e! X/ : \�. `s mom Into In copra..S-tncb mire.slalom man. grit cull W 9 Wn. ran•von°r[°rear peat. leas.bands shall be flea asset 1/0• • ICA \ \ •~n(0.118•dfmur),txx11•d salvage q W am boom.• v°•. 5p•cro]m peat cull b,t not pen Nan VI'Intervals. T �a� Renton HII I , 9::• ____� �, m Q• matt mf.a ASIR 0estmatIm Ae92 W.hail te Class I galvanism by R[t2.... Elem SCtt--�'- m roo ,a,z De. ,\ •tit-a)p preps. -Plm .NAN Nam baM cull N Drwidd aeon bracing Is remind en \ \\ r r or N11 posts. Ram bands Nall N nor.,futond to pond 4'.- hprle sr415 ny Dl.ud°n bare vide°f mate. eon man•.1N,fell eon. 6aeda Nail be et VS'.von•flat at.. PROJECT SITE • ° o \ \ ny CO n A.27.IC-11-A••i MR sane 8 ` \ s Inunale broircneeel�Initn[nP. is`w°�of sGsl`ll II.e WCWITY YAP ��• 15roG. .,89 •a90 ` `. (aalmitm)aralulm9gaae. SCALE 1-=120W `i' QVn • ` ` tmf5 9 JrM_ Q _ \ \ JI8• dote. 4almttad•riN arop re.gm 4.bu[mm m otW.fs• (? .°1 f'w[a4 a D c , .ea% C •_ �.(/ i \'\'.sli`\\ mina:,bl.rlteln9. rme.n m Donn Alm Nm Pna.a psa.l pomactan. • -•� •" % /°�/ \ • ,'lsAO \ 'loci lnineeeclnq con wti'W H. 7 9a 11 rt �n...Ill..- / 1 'ef;ug fi�°� �- ". •- e \\\`,`• /O'> • 'in°...:alg cot::..motif ded for.N.Chlno ieealmroMnf to evit • fiR �r ,-TT,r ."-ll�. �- -t- ,.' v `l. [9• mTs Am a ' `~ °5` .a,• r), a W nee.d.lee hoc dipped N.M.al N rt.g• TRFF 7D B_E"L- _' L'� EXISTING CONCRETE WALLS \ U •� _ \S `\\ C. lIll !ula a IN THI5 � 'y ' • !dO DE REYOYED I7YP.1 i. / .d ` ♦ \. \ II..I1tt[sanil a)a°pec5e at.t con Ns use�laa DLmee`to I In. pljlp�lpy, ',j : a-' /`OOz LIMITS Of WORK • 0 ` "als%Dr pet..am:iNlg:.a iGr0Vato b.ataeira Iw ltm`gan g�C`•3 ,\\!i n •\ 111 gauge n•'vNioedlvueel or of exa el.from Om spaced•t not sore !`eta-„ \ a� • Aral than a a o e oar ran . Al�Z -'w' 'Q aa0 e d . i� `\ ce l£pX1aY PoST!lEm,C°""'m T.Aa PoSn) t7r '�[:< / '*1 .lz• •!, �' \ ./, ° d •a� \m•` Nall ee°lu'ea am plemedm•rarnml wvnim. all von Nan In ' nQ y --- -� ` • \N. - , ',secrete. o eM,10. nor[ter pull•.tarn. Dabs to N Imre..'poets ¢' .!e 5 �-�' :INCB•L ',1 • ' V- u bePoryued at each unllui m / wit:er me per. non 1 . A to .pes�1a edm m am tine°� /l ( �\cd\, • 'y plrmgm Nan m t aesa __.i,A- /•� ei941' T,BE REM. •fI l ' / .95 .90 9.".• •�\ °0 ` \\ \` I�luutnsail pf°iminxrm gL'yrrt.utrmlml•b<mO NTmgn 1° gnus YYY ••��r eI. • • / °� ,:• / aS! t' �i •n'i I,�� '� O •!- �• °`.p05T![RI.6^10.LI.E,peal NO FaaeA"POSTS) p _. ?�- I ' A� _ _ - 01®u. cove peps c Want o1 post ... ill �- / { �•� •'-\/ +\t L•K"` --T- L-- o° .onoz• � y4�zs. -�_>�. ° q[ °f 113 .°e ewie .tea 11 doe a• i••.• • a te-'-a-.__i r: O acu: Peen N post \ 1 tl •eon `\ y\ '.lapmtee°r`A Po uuemia•,ioerl •«elea�anon ma.anN a6' •!\\& ( \�� •!c° s �.«• 1\�..0� j�=� .a%x \yt\\ at°i�l«m Nm[nu rgrv.`a g•.le\dl•an., • �\\\ \ EXISiIN SitILC • PILES \ ` f •!%% •e .mL i, rmETE 8 •e2 S e`• TC ,500 pal,!.ae1'of•,Intl erns all posts a cud ester. •�\\ / -��-� • l\ /-� a p'a•ea „ye 0. PAWS To la tUm tl Mt.amnalaul,1-2•wo.9nwd.Nan annul peso ! • Wll rest m°n vim of Iine poste es WWI.. fie a b. - 1/ / rsetmd t°iae posts f b!sea cub at end fast.of pee pen Don. at / a.as can. fabric.tin haw w faaamm m won anal • `- "a°aE9r. �1 Y - � % .!e z - o-`� - . / ene.mnd.n a;naaan.a..aa,basnd.;;I:elm re.a rw.naNa`IN..be g]. sot ppen a • .:: 444.jet. ▪ °b .:Ion;avtram of;W:,N*oven in cmHwom!mu r ;..:.`�"e`.%c<:1;:'.;::,,.:r � ;: art 'y./5':•�". \ .,a6 c. v�: .' r.;5�y er.:Y1 fig#�3` Aw `sad 3$X6s a. iv.-, iG.41 :+ ;<(: s3 Df / ✓ff 1' Y - dBc •Jos - ` spoe100l10001S.1 .r $ 7 v' .. h � ���� ..i c t Installs..of as..l.l.mama m�pn,balled s. / ff r �y d' /� l e ..I sea Wll first class•and Iul, Iinivned • ,� `N6, �r-=�yam/ - --xz a% .,e% ..l„ 5•d! + aa, \�lp.es.[a. \ Ew�elun. iarcE CJ (O GHa1N-„WIC '"4 �- ♦•{�RO�EECEO WILD . -g. d /� . •, `p+ ! �' 'ILL.µEDEF�4E.U)C ADDROXIMATE SOUTH BDRY. v tl_� !- - `�• SEE NOTE 4 MIX(SNOVVN SNODE.DY ��_��•.,� .d a t sz oz �'t� - �• • /PI. 0 DeE CEDAR R / V E R �c. .�! � e: .alai I � Ja6 , .f d# a 1: ' i. J` ;t f' sin F"FERIGE • • _. -- • ' ,raaskn. ~ `\�` �..• 1111°11111 SEFRO„O aTE 50orN .z9s \ •a., � BNDY.LINE EST BY SC DECREE NO. 90072 � � r • �\.. \\\ \\'\ \ • , / EXISTING VEGETATION ALON ��-~' v CITY OF R E N T O N • THE RIVER CONSISTS OF GRASSES R p, ,,.. a OHUGH G.GOLDSMITH A ASSOCIATES,INC. D[rw MTM[NT or PUBLIC WORKS • DECIDUOUS TREES.TYP. v �y A�' ;:,+;, \ es a Can•uHlno Engin..•Surveyor•-Planners I#IR`Y PLAN for fd . �I .:,k' ','= \ -.� '-ti_ STONEWAY CONCRETE INC. S}Sr 11 ` •I A o ea121 -_ � 1915 Mapla Valley Hwy.Renton WO. 98055 .., / cwac•aD ' cA I/6/e-I u NO W e�� �\e. s `� - = osl�nN �r scu. I'.30' n� o-aw2G et• pp, •maw o ,plea. DATA AP... anaaT�`Lo,�_ arm.••.w Di.,•e, •.a„•.„,«na.aanf_ _._- - • • - I 1��• fob.•} fU11B mama®t11G@ -- ��\�e1�\ era a+so� • MILO 40L rmam.emwl® an. rums •'mnm .my0 rmman 219 avaimm7®.11.1m7.02111 1.20(®•'�1w ii ST i �! r '• :N Mmr I..-08 3 a.2.211mr n mTla Fr ruumr CO OF nvra{m t *Rut �cs • • .RCM�®LS.1 . $O.{'.�j g :R NiIB MA 1 SA _L t-F.9-13P- __ \`� �*.m 10 000 2. Hamm a m MC a enlain6•.11113. s u.0 V It mR m® ECM..a M]11 Al.N 3 ■_ \ i 3 - co. .„i./'mu ST `E \ `.•i \ - �M�an�o.mm u aem®un aeon Z --" e•'�•' H� _- - \ n.c au�memaeamml.aGlm m]t •+ \ SECIIOHA•A 4 T 3! nazi \ aza.•aN. Fanm�`TM losau 131300 e�water wm oozn®.1m r «J.000 , 1I NO SCALE DESILTATIOR POND \ C Mrvena�®Mo eam mrolaumrumavm>m a¢®•�1n �m0ffi CL0110 r:a m m a@C 0..0.30 O. • it it*. i wT dV DERN TO BE CONSR3UCTED FOR LONG TERM EROMON $ Ito SCALE _ \ u 1n•1.oeeanm am®�a uen rem 1313601101 o •' 1m r•mcA RCM nv v.1e m rmT arum ema ro•amn m•O•uMo rn m1ol11m m Tn amv uwT1sm amac n m0Qa•R COMM avMn®ra aamr 4 mn 1m _IIf,.��'�L sSE /TCONTROL,AIDHYDROSEEDEDAS FIRST PHASE OF CONSTRUCTICVF \•:??s \ 1.n 1eTA,eT>am�1.�1!M w.1T,m rawe r� „• L L .i jV \�` ro�am•>�.:cmm:mmr®.u®1mraM®n•ea- • -s-- . Rirar (4Q ..z.z \`‘‘,..,\ u ro 7.7....;�Tm.namNT a 1a�.•u,7 erm +a iuzsr�rnn i e•o.os®Halo 1u�*.1mm velar rs a]�v"wmie�im®r im or + r / WL a .f�1` ° �1 \ urcxmmaoamurs,�e,u m. 7� - ,. :• \ \ ¢J>:va a ra1.m swlmcr. � }�/ ��..�.T .'4.0� 200 Q. / , \♦\ei\ - - -- --- �i®a�`I"a v m r m a�meffi+mr wa m a.m wrn m as arar.>m euula -^i 1 `\ • m1ism e'imlMe.WIZ u a'mf°cuoim ®•10.3!risaa rm m • 7 I 160)1 I}: �O / ♦` `\ I.FINISHED SURFACE TO BE I H2 AIMS. m•�CO Mm um ! 4' N o 2.BMX ADJACENT TO CEDARWTER TO tmmc a>om 111IU 011 T03 Mt (- BE rmia em•.aO•r.�m rm• �- 14 :--_RYA` / \ \ HYDRO �r 1 TI'• ��- \`�i�. 'PROPRNTETO PREVENT EROSION. Tula emm TM.1.leave R. / ra••o mole 210.7.TT for m m aocam cm 13.21111.115 n 0.001110 n A. I • ..,' r. O '1 ``. HIGH EtY WATERMARK IT 10 a mm.a.t®a mamaw mm m 1n mT.1r rm0.wa a em emz m Om»M rmMn a lm AM 1122.3 Or Mm 1.>Q '` •" '� ®7Nr* \\ 4 EEXI t CONTOURS ELEVATION AERIAL PHOTO 1®031.0711.12031130.1210 m,.•T Fm1¢s MT ILO roc o • z W ,I♦/, .nr ..�,+�• �1� _ �a/� 1C? \�DAT 9I66 0..�18200mn®O.=co uo aomm lm m CCM.E.Van Or 7 Q1 Renton Hilt "'s•.+•, -_ / - ` __._ „o a.1m , • Elem Sdi-'-4- Jo 100 •qz 444" _ '\ - •m nmT T.¢10m3�nm aM cT MTwuau cmaar L.Tmr J�!'.\ 1!.®nne•M•n1.M mar mla Orzxa M mall+MO.a1Y®�0.2 3 ' ` \\\ • \ • STAID mVa0,Tm Fm®COMMITT=SE M.m0a m FOm•n a 1W10 mN6.Ta ' PROJECT SITE a �a J/ � V` TM ROM Ts1m m oe•.m'a yf [[�� 2150 ••,. -• •.a¢ 8 \ ` \ QN111 a In CRC M 0702 e®O n�IVT6 n.usTT.¢ SCALEI"-�701T V.fl e. ••ee •ego \\'m• `\-' 1 �_ ' age' \ \ 4e -�• F......e9 \ 'i\• \\ LEGEND• - -_ +i at! � t�•„« S -EXIST=SPOT ELEVATION .,'I � \.--- - .i t1/tLi��- G ,``��\ • 40-.EAs1NGcoHr�t'i.S � �. II , � v .���2•::::::7"'1::7.4',1‘.,11:11111111111111-111 �. allir ��-� __� .0.. .a.` `- \♦'J\a \\ ®_m9TBIG CONCRETE WALLS �k % �� , Id i�/I J cciT . V411 �1 '>s_ • ' \ ♦\ I B =EDSTNG BWLDINGS /� ESISTOVG CONCRETE WALLS ,! _/ - /F�w� ` �� \\• • ` `♦\ _ 1��• a` f/ TOBEREMOYED(TTP.j � •N°z LDOT90FtARR ill i�', L� `�`72 . \ C ;7..J�91+r'• '� r/ N. a •� Oa..a r - • ' \\�`• •a `\ -ELSTBIG CONCRETE PADS 11Fie s ,` 4i * I .•oe , ,�RIDI m\♦ ` \\ -mSTIX6 t/E6ETATFOM A� i F �� • IP[tEtA FLOOD VLAR�i1 se\ \J'��/0 Ie. �� .vz •Jsa/ ..o ` .oT \♦`♦` 1 .•F'T�___rr-FOtTEARFLOODPIAN"4 ,.,.' .r a ; , \ `•]a�,/4: /% OJJ / J" .O i �� - \'•.a\ \ `\ --[�-Przovas®cO1ITOlAis 41 1/ V 4 .325 ‘ S, / OS `' �I//////11�/ r •]n• Jae �.- _ •»z � .•o.la : / 1 `.. \iy z.\� _ - Joc• ,1 - A �' "._STOCt^LBB V / e .bT •u� ..za �,`` \♦` ♦` \\• A~• ` `�.. _ I \♦`• .r,../ ..bz .]sa waa ` .aze `' ♦`l\��♦ \:1-4,, "---„,:. .i. • •30 2 • y.f O`` r riY1c ,�I�� _ .lea •Je9 + ♦ `♦ \:.. 1 • �� T � ® ` - ' --J22 • 1�sir •J90 fr /_ jillii. `♦ \ ! • •F RLL TO MAT« _�'�` _,,,, _ .`� 1. . •p�` •Jo9 ib9 r]0J .191 •aDa / \ -r /r\..♦ '\` pen A AFPRox-Te •TM BONY. ... ...:�: . 116 ' r SEE N• E a. • APPROXIMATE LOCATION LAEPROrer BERM E D A R R / V E R �� �r.1�-- - ••o1 1 ', ii Fa DE LT *ION I SI ATION POIm • --- t bi E sq ; • �-T O / •MDT.LINZ EST.IT SC DECREE N0. 9007E \`... •. .... •f•!?.•:: •-••., ii fri.* 5......,.. '•!• .': Alit..tk.. 4: 8031- ••. `.,-`iaa r ` - , - • - EXISTING VEGETATION ALON' - -:• v CITY OF R E N T O N ! THE RIVER CONSISTS OF GRASSES B D.r DECIDUOUS TREES,TYR •.0 HUGH G.GOLDSMITH&ASSOCIATES,INC. D t A w T r¢N T o r r•u t L l e w o w w• • ,�T��O, ?,601/S N. •.• CaneWeND 08010.•91u.g0n•Pbnnut GRADING PLAN for • I,- -3; :r ( �„ s� s \ �� STONEWAY CONCRETE INC. aq• • •• " f g g of 0at21 `• __ 1915 MOON WINO Hay.Renton WO. 913055 -- - - -`..� ..• F ----------- - - - - - - - 01a01+.« ar..,... r T �J/aa 0 - _ vet n g,..,. •r.ao b' �s..�M..,.. . R., • • • `\\y ,jam\ 12 7.72 \..,, QP`_ • \ `\ .529` • Q. 400.‘.47 z /. \ . • ' \''‘..‘: .\ - • .:.' '1. ,\\.•, Ns \ • .a° \, `\ • 0•E) . :. , AK ' . 1 • D4r44.4Ba .m a \ �4` \\`1r� _ _ _ _ _ � i �' o a\ \��;' \` \ Aeo \ ♦`4327 \\J.+. c ,% L" 1 --�i .R. • i • 0 (ft 644111141art.'- .., i� UZI gr mom` � lip* •31 2 .....„0„.... .9 . t",,,2 •395/ ad 41 kill .323 \ / ,� pi, ♦♦ `♦•♦ v� it O woo 1 111 ". \•♦ivzs \Jai / .]99 L 4 11 _ rTzts _�_ .sax ) !e6 o . Am° ,‘7 i, .." . ...'..7322 - IT( . ' •39 0 , . \ . i*Nl •. • S•• • • - APPROROfATE SOUTH BONY. / �— \♦ `♦ `\ ' SEE NOTE 4. ` iiiS—�_—_ _.°, ]Bo \ 'I�_' �- • • C:EDAR H / {iER 1 • �`- 401 �� �' 4x • --------- Ictigaii: irk-'-\\ '46 .293 __ _ ___ —. N SEE _ gam \` - .- __- -. —_ __._—_ NOTg._q'_. Tb pOAY �•� '.♦, II i \�\. • - / BOOT-LOQ EST.BY S.C.DECREE NO.90072 ••`�` --•` `rib F • - - _• CITY OF RENTON - • 0HUGH G.GOLDSMITH a ASSOCIATES.INC. Dt►AIxTY tNT 01 IuBLle wOtKt \ aY• Consulting Englnss>s•Survspors•Planners 1O16621161n•!. OP i gg g of 81.IL1 �•-_ 9- NCRETE 'M.N..—y•• 3-6G YAt mTO CO G .__ .�®.��..a �4n. WM.. A 4JI0. nun a r' �•..v>n4Y.wrr.. sNQY��W_4— • • • ., ISio., \ •uaa QL� s. ,\ o , . Off' \ N • ' ' NOTES;\\\\\\ . tem to tote FlCal.M pre to any 4yR moaln+man adWy to rite,tr .aaa \`,�'`\ arycanaellmonDmagt•relaCa�wrr. •�\ 2fifuwto0eaylrYrl math oaardoaDrut$ML o m we 1 .s►s ra. • \ \• � \ • .. • ., s •au S \'•, \\ • .aeo \` 00 I _ e� _-_ FFF r1D \ ` ` \ i. ubMALY EMBED FENCE POST(METAL OR a0001 ' 0 aM • ,� _tom rr..� a�'f p ,r \\``n\\ r~ FILTER iaBRIG aEDBRED iO FENCE 7/ -.'_--- ...,_---.- • ,.„e.:W.%.: !Aiot oft—wv,,..r._'_,.'i1t. _ iimli. -,:r-..... 11 11101,4___lilIlIi .. ,:. ‘5s..‘• ‘,..\ . .*Is1•7 _�==' 1 - DIRE FENDI FABRIC • ' 1 < :97 . ,•1::" tp.. REDiENGE ! '— .i tom«..�\:.. ��=., r .- • f'' �; •W [\/\/(�/// , • kl/� ' �``\\ _ 9 RN'1•MIN.DEPTN ���� ;' .aiw J\/) /�I�.` , \ �```\\' OLFBRI DI�TM N4TIVE MATERIAL 7t 4 ~! ,, •eas �Ce•�•00. `�\`'� \\\\;`a\\ SILT FF;NC% v it _ •_ce--l , ./ . • _ A S •'(� .p / one I. �. 4�. e\`.`\\ ro suLE • ... ---'1"11° 7 OLT ....! re ass../ • : ,-----,,‘,-----7_: ..., . It. '\.\\‘‘‘. \% . Witi, • �`yr.," , am desIS2‘,/ - WI ` O `4jc ,�. .w tr�`1� ov�1. .a.. _. . d.a an; - ..Aa/9 •39/ s42.5 \ S • J� 1.\\\\xl;\ ' Y AaT 1110. • \ alki i ' ""' . 1 ' 1\\ • ;IV . \s � - 1 T _�� - -- ram'. s-. (`� I i i \ \\ AtcRGvaTF' •611TR BM • ,/` .:%.'Yy - -« •41 --re." .. - f'__ ~ i !ao It \ ttE[ COTE . SILT FENfSEE DETAIL) E A`f?` � :iy:�E.R ` � —�`t •mI I 1 li__ 1 a{He a. .. ` — — • -- `at • • ,'�' - • / I - WE LS[TIT A-.OW= R0.•OQy- - I \ . •/ • `� . CITY OF RENTON ( '. 01UGH O.GOL63YRII a ASSOCUTES MC. ------- TT OP PUBLIC wos1R• ,.. • 04A '•it„4, \ '.•, Caneutthro Eng egoia•Planners •' TE.SCP-1 a si I. ae.an•Bun. ;..-11'', -<'...,.k;.f,i' 'i -; S- I o� l I1 \ir g ..ii . i._— _ ._ - - . ——. - ------ -- i. IMMO. p .r.a eyia a►—� watrs ew 1_rs• DS/Dskl c' ::: I/• ECF00587 v $! CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) • ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO. : ECF-005-87 APPLICATION NO(S) . : , SP-005-87, SM-002-87 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for special permit ':' to allow the filling and grading on 3.88 acres of property with approximately 53,000 cubic yards of material in order to bring the property to grade with the remainder of the site, and substantial shorelines development permit to allow said fill and grading within 200 feet of Cedar River. .ti= PROPONENT: Stoneway Concrete and City of Renton Parks and Recreation Department LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Directly north of Cedar River at 1915 Maple Valley Highway. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department , 1 The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2) (c) . This decision was made after review of an expanded environmental checklist and preliminary site plan, on file with the lead agency. Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-2822 (D) Renton Municipal Code (see attached sheet) . These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340. The lead agency will' not act on this proposal for fifteen (15) days from August 3, 1987. Any interested party may submit written comments which must be submitted by 5: 00 p.m. , August 17, 1987, in order to be considered. This Determination may be appealed by 5:00 p.m. on August 17, 1987. Any appeal must be submitted in writting stating clearly reasons for revising the Determination and must be accompanied by a non-refundable $75. 00 filing fee. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 235-2500 DATE OF DECISION: July 29, 1987 EFFECTIVE DATE: August 3, 1987 j/ , glifil 2 Ro aid G. Nelson' _ie:r ?, . Spr:i ger Building and Zoning Director Pont DevetQ,•ment Director I Ri and C. oughton p; . Public Wo s Director ; . 1 r ,6 -,r• DS/Dskl StonwyMM CITY OF RENTON . DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE MITIGATION MEASURES ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO. : ECF-005-87 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SP-005-87, SM-002-87 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for special permit to allow the filling and grading on 3.88 acres of property with approximately 53,000 cubic yards of material in order to bring the property to grade with the remainder of the site, and substantial shorelines development permit to allow said fill and grading within 200 feet of Cedar River. PROPONENT: Stoneway Concrete and City of Renton Parks and Recreation Department LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: CONDITIONS: 1. Haul routes and hours of operation to be approved by Public Works, Policy Development, Parks and Recreation, and the State Department of Transportation. 2. All fill materials to be certified as to their cleanliness by a certified professional engineer. 3. Hours of filling are to be coordinated with the Parks and Recreation Department. 4. A landscape/erosion buffer easement having a minimum width of 30 feet from the mean water level of the Cedar River and a northern setback distance determined by the drip line of existing trees along the river's edge and running the full width of the western portion of the site from the western boundary (abutting Cedar River Park) east to the existing sedimentation pond is to be provided to visually screen the industrial uses on the site from recreational uses along the Cedar River as well as to create an erosion buffer from Cedar River flooding; 5. Because of the fragile natural environment of the landscape buffer, fill materials, shall be retained by earthern. berms beginning behind the landscape buffer; NOTE: If ecology blocks are used as a retention device for the proposed fill, they shall be bermed along their river side and shall be • setback a minimum distance of 15 a " Cityof Renton ; .I.,,: :,d= 4 ' ,'i . :'fit{y i '; I,i�a*;.Ca.,�. ;�,»'`I•- •. Determination of Non. _.gnificance` '°'' °f Mitigation Measures _ . Page 2 I feet from', the landscaped buffer easement identified in item 4. above. 6. All bermed areas shall be landscaped with evergreen trees and plants as well as soil retained evergreen ground cover; and 7. Additional conifer and evergreen shrubbery shall be planted in the landscape/erosion buffer easement for erosion control as well as to create an aesthetic visual screen of heavy industrial uses on the site. • •b • d - 1 • t REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: & 0 APPROVED DAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED 7;�jcC cgOSX S c-7`.6/0S ' 4/ ] . )4.77- 1J ' /(-) )e- / / 0‘2"/c--. . f0Cil ,(i'DRLI • - - /- -(4-'C1 4 - DATE: 2.1- /7VP2 • •').A TUFE OF RECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : . ..-- El APPROVED ® APPROVED WITH 11 DITIONS . ❑ NOT APPROVED stMuittt A.09- 04-4,-. rAvar-0.4.- 1 LAroLtsti— mi. ' -0, r ' . : . eCialaett".."th L6 ... — . ' - -0- •• 5, ?. I. - , • AdistNrffirMar270L. ilo Ito e,.....41/4..., ‘ ,:-..,..: r .,,.. . .., _ 0.4....a...... azet.du, irtt..04,1 1... .„ 4,, ' ,_ :,.„, , , ,, 4...4.44.,611+4.4„Liu,* .. ,.. ,, , ,!1. , ,. .,.. -, ., . - GCS 1 DATE: I1) 154-- . SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED EPRESENTATIVE REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: °P.()&)(( (1?. - Li APPROVED . W APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 0 NOT APPROVED V rUo &R.N3/1\;(0 t t_cuJ OR►PLWW , " cF l l5 To Inc NAxkudia, n-N)o GR oir v, slicia,0 tea: el apras 1 Mu/lit/km DIF )O i o' TO PrL,Li >w 'OR. OE-CA:1100U S tbisicii, .I13u Fp p possir ,6 poTtmeL P s7 .irlio Pcc6ss.. . ( -1 G RADI k6. s 14 LL ovb-t • xcccs,t) 2,1 I LOp A-NY) 15_t- �e l Q D 9�.+art d 1 vvw t4.1 Gf't'j w/eUv1/4-0&QOM S rubs;'1:Rabs. Dorm' CoR.ouivD C,c3 z. o 0 to\-iK 15 rikkeD SW/ I IO \--=-0K. Ito Fo u m/ 'z 3uV,5-1Nv1 iaL U C IAtlolu Q601=rd SH�oUt3 Y5E p Rc c r NuoN6 c,ID( ' (Dt ayl5-I"a►tiuP-1 p�zopeerY -.t��. c.o- . - • . . 3) orot:f c ,CA G I slip ' ..l.ISFA I i% mapRoutA., DATE: . SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE ' 'Ql\-i• ,k..A,%, t J 17. 7. REVISION 5/1982 H. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION; /.4e 7 • E/l /A f iPi//C ' „ El APPROVED IROVED WITH CONDITIONS ,E1NOT APPROVED �rae-i �l'7 .21 . D i P e._-. a °z.a I,,y ,�� d1 :. p . ' /.4:,;-,7L • / � �� ' . 47- DATE: 0_7/07 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHOR ED REPRESENTATIVE REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: lnt/1y 6- "• ` 0 APPROVED flAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS I 'NOT APPROVED [UTILITY APPROVAL SUBJECT TOJ p;,1 dekti4 "le Pt pi otatika I LATE COMERS AGREEMENT-t::.:_.., /✓0 LATE COMERS AGREEMEET- opt �9'�014 SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-b'J:ii:.i+ /1/0 " � 4 \\\ SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-SEWER , 'n -31 ‘::-. SPECIAL ASSESSMEWI AREA CHARGE-WATER /0 ® 4/1 r Gli't • SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE-SEWER Ak APPROVED WATER PLAIT N l �, QEF ' peIIS 110�16% �APPROVED SEWER PLAN j) "! i:/) APO ROVED FIRE HYDRANT LOCATIONS. `'' DY FIRE DEFT. AI0 • 0 FI. Fir"�A2I LYSIS J ( ' 0°.'i / '9 /' ' DATE: SIGNATURE OF ' IRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE , REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : DAPPROVED 1:11 APPROVED WI ONDITIONS /21-NOT APPROVED b 9 eetLC-- ael'1---774 ,C rr3-4 / S 47.--e____, A7/_____÷.;. 2) ie-e- 42-..c —cDer V-7le.ic:;4_41.-i"-e4---q4 /7-=7 Se:/:-"te-e-- - ',1.717"---. 1,- OX " cC.7( / . " -9 -1',02e=X7: . S740,0`-' /•°7/ ar- -- •Se72^ ,G- e-- te-,..a ,,/z,.. ,41.4.- . V-ea.e-40((X C7>re2t72 -. 9) ? /ei,-- P 74 f _ _ C, i Ve ,V/,--t_ -7). p-4._ , 417-oc . ' -'7 * -* . j*.a,. .• 'f. .7' .:# , • , Z________ A7 . - ' „---es'°'s TE, � �,,f SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHO IZED EPRESENTATIVE fr` . . • ...mgoevaTuLf2j1(711101,21i-fi . I To Ev4. 1 d- `87 Date From Subject ed.:44.77_ ?,406, ve S • L tic-I .0 066/Cc/Ars 7 SetAdicae a olddre-s Sed 0 77ke uNrciosS:rec0 c-IdtAt5 Rives*. rieu J Ma/ sitde u r,r i-5 Alto 2kvc,„ 7/o c d s — A!s o c c�cam, off cvel f s 1 sower �Q,!( �� _ S 4 o,.(„Q ; e v�,e�.: 11, 1X. *um totedi^v -( nro e 7-rps , . / e FlO J ( C.:94G G c tCc cE-\•, (S Av871 0/Ave°VC. '.fc) , --j �Q'JcX (IIJa7,�G CKGNNe Q�1 c�C� ��C Sold,` _y ( , 4 n2©ec picsc ' .;-.. /► // be pfC Cci ' j J 7i{(4 � edM4 7 d, , a r� '. tea. ki 6, Y 1;" S • REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: ['APPROVED El APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED DATE; �'�/ SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 6ft. pike-km.01mo 131.41 o- CAPPROVED" APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 0 NOT APPROVED ' CITY ®FREBCE �LN r a o41987 r okaDING/ZON►NG • DATE: #e /9� 7 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE 1 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; n/G,>iNE�I2.iNk� APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 0 NOT APPROVED /1 i` c'/r = 9 !'adILA.? fJ.t�y!- !✓1 a(�{p�c'. Q�4r7/�-r•t.,/� d' • 43/ ! Y • F RENTON rEf's.11 V Er DATE: 4 A 4t61) SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE 11 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: 1&fi #1 APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS El NOT, APPROVED SQL Cha r%e• I /���e.- diled /�aaice7 fi ,��y, CrrY OF: RENTON 1-F)) C EC V E FTP 1111987 3WWWE i G /ZO M'!C DEPT. / -1 DATE; Zlrea9 SIGNAT y OF DI ECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE �i jy a . . JAN ��� +.► 1 g87 ai '' F� CITY OF REIOTB'®1�TT. era Aut9.6COILVad PARKS and RECREATIOAL..-,_... .. Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor John E. Webtey, Dir 't A lt , January 20, 1987 ; tr„-mittst.• � , ai, llieT ;±9w)A1 1�e7 ' lit ►:�iil Fh. Mt. Richard Padrick IriCi:,;,fir 501 Lon Building g � ai,.x��'� Seattle, WA 98104 �.C Dear Richard: I After reviewing your proposal with staff and landscape architects currently und,r 01 contract to the City or the community center project in Cedar River Park, we h-ve5oN come up with the following concerns: "" t t li4 1) The filling of the Stoneway property would adversely affect the park from a wigs* N visual and noise standpoint if the existing use is maintained. The large " berm and its attendant landscaping between the Carco Theatre and Stoneway property was installed to help mitigate_ttiese problems, 2) The filling of the Cedar River flood plain could adversely affect downstream properties (including the park) in the event of a flood. We would like addi- tional information froma. hydrologist concerning this potential problem. 3) The short term traffic increase required to haul in fill material should be addressed (i.e., routes, times, days, etc,). If Stoneway is allowed to fill the proposed 3.5 acres, our concerns include mitigation of the following: 1) The depression created between Stoneway and the Carco Theatre (park land) should be filled with clean, free-draining material with the final 12 inches being top soil suitable for plantings and turf. 2) The landscape materials currently in place that would be covered with fill should be replaced. Material should be of the same size. 3) Heavy landscaping should be installed along the property line to help mitigate the negative impacts of increased noise and aesthetics deterioration due to the use of the site. We would be pleased to work with you on the matter of plant material. 4) We would also like to review and work with you on fencing, irrigation, drainage, and proposed construction schedule if your proposal is-successful. If you have any questions or comments, please call me at 235-2560. Sincerely, / .._CITY OF RENTON t.. c v E Sam Chastain Parks Superintendent - FER 1G•i937 J 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2560 13tliL�f!'lt /ZONING DEPT. HE/dskl AG102787 CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING October 27, 1987 AGENDA - COMMENCING AT 9:00 A.M. : COUNCIL CHAMBERS, SECOND FLOOR, RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING The applications listed are in order of application number only and not necessarily the order in which they will be heard. Items will be called for hearing at the discretion of the Hearing Examiner. , STONEWAY CONCRETE AND CITY OF RENTON PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT Application for special permit to allow the filling and grading on 3.88 acres of property with approximately 53,000 cubic yards of material in order to bring the property to grade with the remainder of the site, and substantial shorelines development permit to allow said fill and grading within 200 feet of Cedar River. Property located at 1915 Maple Valley Highway. File Nos. : ECF-005-87, SP- 005-87, SM-002-87. ' AYERS AND HOFMAN (RIDGEVIEW ESTATES) Application for Preliminary Plat approval to allow the subdivision of approximately 7.7 acres of property into 25 single family residential lots and the creation of one tract. Property located north of N.E. 24th St. and north of Anacortes Ave. N.E. File Nos. : ECF-057-87, PP-067-87. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON,WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER COUN- CIL OF PUBLICATION THIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE UN- CIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RENTON,WASH- INGTON,ON OCTOBER 27, 1987,AT 9:00 Audrey Eenner ,being first duly sworn on oath states A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the PETITIONS: STONEWAY CONCRETE AND CITY OF RENTON PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT VALLEY DAILY NEWS Application for special permit to allow the filling and grading on 3.88 acres of • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition property with approximately 53,000 cubic Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week.That said newspapers yards of material in order to bring the prop- f are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six and to grade with and substantial s shhoo remerelines des d deer a the site, velopment months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published permit to allow said fill and grading within in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King 87,87 ft. 0f SP-005-8787, River, File Nos.: ECF-005 ,SM-002-87. County,Washington.The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal AYERS AND HOFMAN (RIDGEVIEW newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for ESTATES) County. Application for a preliminary plat approv- King al of 7.7 acres into single family subdivision of 25 lots. Property located north of N.E. 24th St. and north of Anacortes Ave. N.E. The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the Kent Edition File Nos.:ECF-057-87,PP-067-87. , Renton Edition Auburn Edition , (and not in Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Building supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers and Zoning Department. during the below stated period.The annexed notice a ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRE- Notice of Public bearing _ SENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON OCTwas published on ()etcher_ lb, 19h P2 EXPRESSBER HE OPINIONS. OA 9:00 A.M. TO 7 �75 � EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. Published in the Valley Daily News Octo- ber 18, 1987 R2575 The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $ 27.67 Subscribed and sworn to before me this - `:r d day of October 19 67 Notary Pu is for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, King County, Washington. VDN#87 Revised 11 86 , HE/Dskl pub1113 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON NOVEMBER 24, 1987, AT 9:00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: STONEWAY . CONCRETE AND CITY OF RENTON PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT Application for special permit to allow the filling and grading on 3.88 acres of property with approximately 53,000 cubic yards of material in order to bring the property to grade with the remainder of the site, and substantial shorelines development permit to allow said fill and grading within 200 ft. of Cedar River, File Nos. : ECF-005-87, SP-005- 87, SM-002-87. YODER/WEBB SHORT PLAT Application for approval of a four (4) lot subdivision of 0.79 acres of property zoned R-2, duplex, a variance to allow two pipe stem lots, and a waiver of off-site street improvements. Property located at 2000 and 2002 Kirkland Place N.E. and 2010 Kirkland Place N.E. File Nos. : SH PL-085-87, V-086-87, and W-087-87. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Building and Zoning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON NOVEMBER 24, 1987, AT 9:00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. CERTIFICATION I� Jerry F. Lind , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON OR NEARBY THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing in Fn.31-0 , on the 1 day of \ ,) ) g7 � .p,c) SIGNED: 1J Ql\ I , LAArN • ,, , _ ,„,, ?,.. ,,Or ',R2`6, ,, ,• -. t,,',I• , ,., - • ••,,. ,,,, , , , . t ' A. 'i'?��'.•� 1 t 1 ice,' +w.;. f ` � " .11 r* '�etrA .A. /:eV 1`.' da 3 ".,t.' ri t� n fit^' �} �4 ���c., s Js�'� O11�" 5, ".. 'obi .4,1,, ,„, rk, '` w r' '� � 2 `l,k ry+a r k 2 t"�t#a�-a',r�'(ir s l' ,. iv,y urn, O �¢ ''1 "?.4'60 SEP1 -'� . i1 City of !Renton Land 1'se : ar ng Examiner w UU ho'd a ,qq`-vv1 ;r. # F N.,_. ., cft, P1t1 o.,, r ,�,]{�}'+•r ±�j; ,yy� py f i k: ' 1,1' y 'I Ry Y �w +F'++ ��-*•eS+�Ti ,,i (+ 1 '�' � 'tkt4 LI, 'J3 x $ J. z' 4 ',r "1 4 it,` 1z r ;',14' ti , OV el Lit , :,,,k... ., „ i'V. ir rif..' '144 rt 44 Cl ‘r ,...t til hqf t it% 1.0'4 ki ,— '''Y, i hv 4 A N ko'' r 44 „, °C 4 tf, gi-* ;,t• ..fx, , iliA,,„ky .f,it,„ 1 j, 1, , .17:p 10,,'44 tl t,:: L,Ali il 0'. I , - 1 ' .4;. ;d4r:„.4 1` • in CITY CSUNCIL CHAMBERS 9 CITY HALL ON NOVEMBER 24, 1987 E G 1 N N 8 N G Aim 9:00 A 0 P 0 M 0 ' , STONEWAY CONCRETE & CITY OF RENTON PARKS AND .,•y r �s.' r�1' � t � t; 4 S RECREATION DEPARTMENT,- 8P-005-87,SM-002-87,ECF-005-87 APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT TO ALLOW THE FILLING AND GRADING ON 3.88 ACRES OF PROPERTY WITH APPROXIMATELY 53,000 CUBIC YARDS OF MATERIAL IN ORDER TO BRING THE PROPERTY TO GRADE WITH THE RAMAINDER OF THE SITE, AND A SUBSTANTIAL SHORELINES DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO ALLOW SAID FILL AND GRADING WITHIN 200 FEET OF THE CEDAR RIVER. ". _ - ' -"--- —t lPi1 7 "\V f.', 1,,,.r.,,'_,,..,}it: -1. :1i1143 -A . 1,;(tti, dale/ , , /,,,, ? ; -,,,, , , . z,„,s,. _,,„Ift: t.;z2_, :i ::,=,14 ... ! ‘kii rt"'"\"Xil t," i / . ili,t, I i !I' • -"'• ,4* ,a te tS� L L.4,P A .l t 1 '. o: 1,aid,r I,''t ... 1 /�ri 1 -J ' aY'a t yr �/ ( • 11,"£ 1Z: r 1 r f 7 r �� r i °� ( , ,rii.f •I I, - _, n . ---GadTrr I ''' ' ' `ai',.4': �1 ` [L1.GIT1' ��� 71 ' :„J� e;Qi — P'Q• �^' t t t— i ' /, //r \\ ,,Y .— r �4 ' 3-�l 5 L _ r ,,,,T.,,:; , e i_d. ..?.,'/ , , / f ' 11 4.! r- 4.:.,.. , N o %d• ` i11 0-1 ;'c4 rorrouv , �RS�t, 1 .1 CEDAR RIVEntt,, ;�a FI —1 ,,,, PARK >\,� ;7 f .// '%r x \.- • ,, ` J .� 4,2 S.0(E'er i i 31,..,.,r:.,i,, _ tea —p ''1 =0 dl '.-� �� fi - tl • ,. \ ,5 J # '` LYE �I [:4'—lY\cccc��++ ��+,7t i 4 • IRE'-+.n O LOOTED SOUTH OF MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY AND NORTH OF THE CEDAR RIVER AT STONEWAY CONCRETE, 19 D MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY, AND CEDAR RIVER PARK. IF NI ER FL9EITHE.P1 Vs F sm.RMATO +REV CALL THE CCTV CakF RENTON UIIL, •!1ONc & Zlif MI G ® PART E-, - 235 255 0 TE F -- FIS3 E' N' T "" J �� x ' `6 ! `� PROP' 'tf,N1 ALiTDACREIZATIltaigIM ♦,-.. •. .,.._.•..,.,r....�r.•,.•.mi w>�?'it"4'Atry•"..,, a:«71:1YJ9m<...._. - -- — -- • • 90 co o9gT.E0 SEPS°M°. - City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner . rY will hold a +`. o->1 *h"'nf � y+{Fi'Sn }F?I w.+*r 4R"a',k'a`v�I:r :^".. w33T,};• {'ix1.n.,"• # 3 t'` j ' n E t 1' a4w 4 .p ( t^rft.E • • • in CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL ON OCTOBER 27, 1987 BEGINNING AT 9:00 A.M. P.M. i N E N r OF RENTON PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT ECF-005-87, SP-005-87, SM-002-87 APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT TO ALLOW THE FILLING & GRADING ON 3.88 ACRES OF PROPERTY WITH APPROXIMATELY 53,-000 CUBIC YARDS OF MATERIAL IN ORDER TO BRING THE PROPERTY TO GRADE WITH THE REMAINDER OF THE SITE, AND SUBSTANTIAL SHORELINES DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO ALLOW SAID FILL AND GRADING WITHIN 200 FEET OF CEDAR RIVER . • GENAVL LOC1, ,TI •• ND/OR ADDRESS: MAPLE VALLEY ' IGHWAY FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING &ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2556 THIS NOTICE NOT TO - BE- REMOVED ° IT'ir OUT. PPrIPER. AUTHORIZATION : . .�J'•'l:• rua_r 44. _ - _ .._ _-_ .r'—�•--_ --- ._ —1—'-1,1 _y • -.4.2.011-_- 2.-,. . . ,21. 06;2. • -f. , - Inflilt.Pir / / "?. ii ,.",. ,f '71.1 ill 4 � (, �E' .•. slow sr I , . Il.' I i1 iog ?.71 L r- WI . ) ['+ .tea !. / _ il fill ., , -; I s i 20Elf.2 . 1 .041._ , 1.. .{..]:17 / /////, # ‘... i Lam r‘j r U, - ' [f..' .. it �1 , 1_• a / -1,e' rl. ;min i� o,� , - ' 1 . ;" / 1 '. ?�1, rs e 7 , n r III e r i YN ► r _A e1` -1 W�1' in t 7 4110, , 4Iiii=3 '- — s • a iii r_lr,F.N., AIZO' � `�� PARK I.•� /!r a ..� F. m CEMETE •• \ --� • e r • CEDAR RIVER " �,Ij,_ �. ��' P® 1 f PARK \ . � "/s►,I,I: I, 1', / T- r 11 1 1 ^, t vF. Ault = { , r .. E ' '' :,:,...N--, ' - ,\,_---- ,----,., \ , u--... , J tiAL‘' , •'';i 1/• ---:-'-:::- ---------- ---==.- 411 I .. , MEI • , l •+, _ _51%.,4;-- , m-p \ , ...,, • — , , ' I Uill -T:7-1 5\ %,' ____4_,,a p -1 , . , Q c-i4 7 4 i,t I 51r —,:fir ��, N:,N\it.._. . 3 4! -,..._ s,\,,,„ STONEWAY CONCRETE and CITY OF RENTONltlF:)P PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT SPECIAL PERMIT: •SP-005-871,,...j STONEWAY CONCRETE and APPLICANT CITY OF RENTON. PARKS DEPARTMENT TOTAL AREA 3.88 ACRES . PRINCIPAL ACCESS MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY EXISTING ZONING H-1 (STONEWAY CONCRETE) , P-1 CEDAR RIVER PARK • EXISTING USE STONEWAY CONCRETE-INDUSTRIAL, CEDAR RIVER PARK-RECREATION PROPOSED USE INDUSTRIAL USE-STONEWAY CONCRETE, RECREATION-CEDAR RIVER PARK , COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN COMMERCIAL-STONEWAY CONCRETE, RECREATION-PARK COMMENTS THE APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT TO ALLOW FILL AND GRADING ON 3.88 ACRES WITH 53,000 CUBIC YARDS OF MATERIAL IN ORDER TO BRING THE PROPERTY TO GRADE WITH THE REMAINDER OF THE SITE. • b LOCATED AT: 1915 MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY. • ^ao laponn elt MN lbw Nei %�D ? ?�S • Pm1GBafM1wq:I` �\ P00500ra aLaac: • x+ 8 _ BK A. ILL® \ A. �SCpIN1ON [F0 tf0 coma OOSi3 4 ST a• I 1 J 7 4t. :20W ID•: ..a.of•50.-ribs•(11........... 7......, , —. _ lore a1 aertwur/encl..eve shall m MAN)feet.Noce.11 hog too ......niwtop eat leas than 5-7i 1..per L-f. - { r— tL n entzu \� W mtaw eemiov.fn. m[im IaAm el tent.shall°•In in.eiofnopL�� c Wlndsm C6 LL I ....&cm •• "AM ac iron.yulaen above pulp:. see plan for raga location. UNE POSTS eJrtori E 0 1f1.7�e 7 Hills Pork I S� C. rDnulm \ - rue 0.0.afgetA not loss fen,3.13 1p-per L.f. NTI33 a `�///�lll'�'i 3x' •� i •y to-zo-zo aatnn.s Musa mamtn fans. 4pty.e.rem a f. poMT DuctsJ ` m4' A. D. EE1t VI[pnY6!NIX \y`C\ ` F- MEM. Braes sM»pat PM'0.0. .d flat mt lea tM'.n tea. son t 15 i� N IO lbs. er Cl \2• \ root. Bran:toll a prow.for each corner or•n0 post. Modes.11, T.. 2 t x '4 W.A.nr awn \ \ �Lconstruct.v .lamb free.. o1ba 5• W inn of...roar corn.. all q r!most b/�s• R Qrr•enNso IeaatMe.a-SMtt•Da1gNt•Ete 01U \ •HAlley r lea nos rat 1 Wte oxcart m. .in et iugvutll aoen to base of ayetnt iin post. RLT •=� R Ome.n elts.1.1.1-Mosconi Priam cans Iron on au.l ntarlal al galvanised etcen u brMafur • N SLDO �°•' SS llnw 1M•II-Slw flu \ crpl H. 1Iwnfrctlr patetnitee nurul or caudal upon.ich union 'Ilex COATED STEEL Room:: - -:f, P� (•Y' MT OW - �R..over monocle-Iwl l P.R> ed of wlrnittnp occur xsil not b.tumtabl.. All acw or n xiscallane.s stool fit.........all b e}...al o+e. w I .�i, _ 1 r• /1 }3 meesctla 1rta-D1aN UW Svter' �5 °hall p•/m nr sbN aew•. 11 alto motors to De patrols.Our bettor co.W. •r L cast as .P.. m W anti to r, IF ;`c,>- �. IRK: i• qv' R Lwlm uemigtva-vav>°mnlw ,+ \ atafn]m final:ofw. aurncl.n' m as.anam ore Hoer properties to orortea• eaawe iH \ .1 1'N 111 25...to t...-PIA.Con.. •` Men • In conjunction elw fabric,tofu aM wins of the O PoN./ Rnti .; tl; 11 R 010.11a parr.. ` \ ``� \ •lb pas•Waritl for eb mafanan of steel pip n.for posts-W _ape... heroin. mtg.of zinc mating on blw llata0 stoat f•ui. J,. (Y bans shell conform to nwinanta of AS.GSla.tin Alto, moot 11 00.1.2 wit-per span ran. �](' `/ \ • 17�aili '�,,,. _a'. -,,,,�� \J s..b AI....n.bt.from node mom m.a wens.Post Drnw ea:'zIss. m \` o Gh toleraon n...lac posts Nall es.11.0 a pre..below. pan � • atlq,cantonal.NS.. w.r.r2..25. /R..Poo OA.. \`\ a'en' q.Qf 2DG j�. / _ • �� \ •A11 pests men.soon Nall.....Plvnlu0. They shall bona. Allto u for.In lint tom•Nall b Hired with roDrarN temlzea sT 1 .urea ann.of 1-0 at. 21.coml.par we.foot of surf.One pressedg8W1 se amimn W on..n pas[............. '17 ` o 169)I f ' P� /7 ♦ \, \\\\ Tot..1......tn.len fM 1.2 U. ten...par:teen . >'- ... ` snot of surface arw- In the can of aotars wide from ploy, this area TENSION OM - j� 5� - • - Q \ •`\ e•WI. total ores 1n16.W outs.. la for ...mg Ippae palranl:M stool tan MH1 b nt 1....,• NW W 7C I G� \p ` annoy.of.Loot f n.0. s WI.••a I2-I.ore.tot free each Ir Int u fabric bight. Woo ono m b Ores.. fa.ic o .\ `a \ arms o1 0alvnlied n..r, Fitting.,a8.•'-moo oW...shall ate..m pasta S>as o/ton....wcod rat m Uceed W. am. o 9 'r• •ygGLEI KA N / wl.nlnv•1n . maa..th..wi menu or As x malphanw Mn, r. ton p w ee.ra.not p e m past mr ton r a m k �� /' a \\;ills\ Oren ntnitle shall b wlvuit•0 n spaCIIbO lanlulmr. m a PO r(, `\ \ • N. fAuic\ • TENSION DAMS -• . O . - "1 .- \ - .OS // \a \ , `. n(a In 14:7 mt• .,% came°:elam0:i Ic Na1'b p Dn•• n eM or corns wit. Tmu°aM'toll b Hat fuel Le•1 a w - •'A 1• • // \ \ \ •`ge�q.. \.\•etaewr7.Lrvrttiee nlr.p w tan avG mate. vr. Sp•ciq w pie Na,l b,s ens nr.elw Ir mtar.al•. G I1' •,r �\' �� `\ •P• •isll crfn.a to 1.5111.1.1.1..9 an.11 b Chess I gal...b MAC HAMM T �� Renlon Hin _-9+_ / , z vo.ea �mr - o b P. / ' p `\ -atP pawn. 1rnl:.d steel eon mom::too b pi..Aar.Donna is nwt.e w car .� Etem Sch / \\ aunt..ner ar p1 pfss. labs h.ma.bon b a..nlr at.r.e m to.ss �•, / ablc Yy1rlykol•M n park side of poi . , ou atth a ran loos pre••bon b of If•••L.•net ateel- PROJECT SITE .. • (—_ .\ .LA3 RR Bon - .se8 \ ` \ Ties°ornclips Man be pro..for 040.Win link fabric 11n 4'io-V--0QH - c - sonar rvals or not ors ten u•. r+n any b or steel Ii�P nCIFOTY YAP {�� e p rC,"IS'AJ.C. 14.40 .•90 ` \ Ig.t zeC)toralntmosoauw- SCALE rry 1200' lJC, - Q 4•' a ,� ` i•uis N21 men�• ,, '\ \ \ pie• ras>nM.d.+udLraebt.apanaad. {>D a t •a_9 ' I \ \ \ +'ri` \ •b]ne.bl:fietmg. fmm�m waeaamb.q ma.a am.1 town7 4 b • \ moo- •, •' �� ��yy ` s` TENS.MAEUw torn ahallb m.)p.up.11 s rt eel •n Wll[anl t \\ . ♦ me reauov or Hoe o sh ll allo.wit.a. ...n loot: mi>.0.0, r99\ i '/ .. 1`�1 �letla-s.e.` .-- •\\\ `r�a9 eoa w,1 ee pr<. n.emteinv:.nano.In m a .e--) \. - .0' � •t .^= .�Y _ _ �`1T�('/ • �`p' `� in[.rt•la nt ncneln9 la•.� •(• -' -- h-\ ���a• ' A `t� fr °Oa av S' `Df`\````S • Tmftln and S AND Era.pans.b fitted with mt 01°pd galvanize0 1� • �; �� ` m.spa H 1 $0MEADDITICN t- \ + __ \\`��. \♦ C. MrntAalw fiO4 ::�/ BUSTING CONCRETE WALLS 1 'fD } �4 9" I` z.70 BE REMOVED DTP.) 1�l t i� . � \\ ` •,` \ LINE flmEerDM e�.nee • n m[ n 1n lIw fZ v _ a \\ ` \ n posts WIl m Wn 10'to ry u'pl�e0�tn I r 1 G• � -� land n •rer[t 1 it.. All son I. et to PARK M` ,.44.4.115 hi 3. - - ra02 .ed � \ ` ` with hlar gauge to be inn steel th top. IMl m D.os space u lice gno L71REeTIt7N. '� LOOTS OF WORE \ \ \ then»oaaa.^.1rn1:.0 soon or 9 g.w..tww dos aqua at m: ' 3. .,�`• \\ \\Si •pe•`\ ..• file.....A tug.D.myfr..... b y •*` �•�` 32 - \ • •t0 e d it \\\ \ °TDEaONII a p°Ts�eE°0G C0'e0.1�.p.'yii 011))tlgiw. Alt poste CO b coo 1. i ;. l ` .3. • - ,noon ` `• •`� to hat a nnpan fardpll.n conaopstsl0eb tt ash urmfnpa �u s to _ } i' F L fa�.. .]a 5 '-`� `:MG B. .•`` , f ; ` `\ e l ovals of not pare<D30 Er. ann pao is ''wine.ro tea w /�f• i a BE REM i / .. w \ \ ` iniiitai.cstretch mpg inal ng r°irms•o r eons potty • S! %' a r� . �` .`p5 roo••. � .aD \ ` Onto. Insui�unalp rods of 4mlal.rot eb Er°aorn�1 Ufa Oz � \ w.rena,t pas i 0\ 1 a � . .( `\ I • Post c4 : / .a02 •• / �j • t roo.ee ae96 T pa1C•eniten eight.ropro.l tr 1-2•tlm.pang,free one,n)tsFtbe .S �L _t-\ 3 n a l be.posts n Hof si nos'posts n Ifloe. ,f and ten him pain e>nos tone a Intervals or m[more Mt m .341�/\/1 1C * i 4p / - { In.gmOentlr bltenalonrpar wtu hanat. Tnalwewtr�Nlleb usntmd q ""Han, ;�.,�:1 c V . .fez I .a ar hq ring. tran 4TnaWc mono tto form a cAntiell. b A' yy ]De sea I fabric noon to • .^•H \ 3 - 3__- \ .Des • .d9z • •-•se .age .az nos• b> tlnou.nWa A t mvau im ��i/ . f". urfON A ONC.AMSNIP p (, p ` "''�• �• !C.a: �,/Hsi" r � -' �',�5 )• _ _ _ •]e. - iNe•�c•`tonlfaaanont IEiinatrvirEi.a..�nwcneo i.l.lanng�taa se _-.-- n gig •llnap.cw. mom re �� "'�° >e g 1]e• t nos �• 7 \l '•um m OW'11 i1\rE>.R y�-\ � • -== oA.XY< �`Z..M'0'<'Y-^� 1. ` .JD9 S .,52 �" t•{ J Io GH4N-LINK rENGE IiYDR0.9EE17EC7 WILD • '-g, �. _ - - a �-` I A I ( / aPPROX,YLTE,sWTN eDRr. �.\ `"1(4L•HEDEFC HELIX SEE NOTE O. MIX(SHOWN 8NA0�Y ``� ` -- ___ De D a 52 02 y\ VI—. i `� .N eliern ee CEDAR V _ •.Dh I • N, al, ;/"' . '.. :.,' '-`:r• .,... ,,,. ,.., , .:-',2=e1"ret',•• \7,-----.64.4 — — ;--.77--•—— _._. ...—..._-----.. ' aboo. ------------------------.. 4 . t • •D. -. - no `kF SEF NOTE Ea SOUTH BORr __ ‘•, \. \`Si \ \ ,• I. �/ BNDT.LINE EST BY SC DECREE NO. 90072 '- �� \296 \\\ �\`�\```\ 1��� \\ r • EAISTING VEGETAON v CITY OF R E N T O N THE FIVER CONSISTS TION OF AFL• GRASSESD O[IARTMRNT OF PUBLIC WORR• O HUGN G.GOLDSMITH 8 ASSOCIATES.INC. • CV• \ kI• Consulting Enflmoos•Surveyors•Planners LWJC>;i'oPE PLAN for D.it/0 �.A DECIDUOUS TREES.TTP v , . •e red $ .,i� \ yi 7f� t:y - STONEWAY CONCRETE INC. a rota 4 R ,_C �p� •I E \..� r 86121 '_ 1915 Maple Valley Hay.Renton Wa. 98055 •��� JJS.L��•` .• cNAca[a 'pan h/6/97 - �$>� .PNs 4mT a I'•DD' , sass =.a•Pa r r��.. ape. emmas o BY able 0 an .._.-...--- JH[.t�7.�I�— �Tl�Vim" . + FUIIIHE F[DSII®®VL@' -�i�as>_ n °mm else _ ;4� a I y. -=%''"- 404 �•� \ \ sRID �imrw ma.m� rJ9r®rmrma0 Wm a m r ro roar P.M r or.w 6601T 603AD°mm °IF"�O cs ram Haman awn MO vwmmyzrtmanm®.n LOUuberaam ruacun mvroar myw mlaam.rmtmm m R.Iran. nt®m a m m NOT..Y.c•mmlem 1•wlC lmwant.aYs•0+•v.! _ ®III=IT 6R®me8®1>ffi m TM 00 m 11.0011 I®®nwma .RIOIl i •4' Ni Pm►I $� • Ter. -- \•. I ° ®®moo I�® fi ®i - n I • 8 • I .3 C�4 __L. e .r 9LT ST E \`• I \ ®au a nw m[m P.wm oaaam mrtuz m GNU m z®un a Im.au m®b.i�ev a zna..roz B Mt `�yy :NO __ - ® \�sz. \ tmommr""roaaunmar rou t�sE-,1".„-.` S�� SECTIWM1' ��roar zos®�um m�i.o rsm•m c]m ms>s�n, _ ? 110 SCALE D@97LTATIO POfD \ ' O SINS.®®amr�mmrol2a.eaumtaa� er�c a11600 0OP01 za •uam1nnmxoufVomzom.- • I � `' 1�, .� 'BEI9.TO DE C09137ROC7EDFOA LONG TERM EROsiflll ND SCALE `~ \ m mImt rm very mn°rn mm w ea avl;zm{f L Q • 'w Izaa.om[m exo®mum rom rang. _ m'm I��aa w as�v.gym m m[m1 n zn R g ' a TSEa i \`:ems:� n CONTROL.AND HYDROSEEDED AS g... PHASE OF cONs.,,,.10Y \ my a moor wwxoru m�n ems.°m n CO r<a w.®v sam mmm: V m 13 IR mm9 iTJ°'Y'•.ar al®TITS Vs1�1 am m Nm vmli0®¢4WT an L• _ nt$�ei lam°la mwn�i®nl.mea nv®Ram► . y ] !Q ' ♦ \`````` \ U roi man aV.Plw m TES Iemffif b rom Comm vw66111 rer65°m moan m.a[m caro aYX nn wm MIA AMR GI A b9n V 9a.z nm ummroa tm0 cvm nyn cae Dr+ma®v+r: ,]I _ Porl _ .._h II! , / \ \` rasrz..oa mama a mammy na�r. urons atom gnu nmm m mnn mar.u®mar a m m srmxrmr laa CT 63Ts 200 Q` \���4 - — �mam9mwm.mammr>mi emm.mmnro�9X�rm:.u.. <`"^� ��` t L PQ • \ \ N,��mmnm me°aa a .°mm'Onnro - - A N,'r- 4. - 169)1 1,' ..,;:a• \ \\ .ram um 1010 A ;\�'. ' 1 t16,' I c.. i `\ z:e�AN[i��luwr�TocEoisiw�m ors" m LIS -,V;1mJ �ssm . I ' '4Lk. --WA N / \ ei7\ ram S•EA s eTOPn�TE PLANTED AS 100 660 ERo ym m'y .� �-� I .^ ._; br` « .` ,,, OS.'�501 ersas rmrromca9.m rm ebsr..mmraaBanawmD rsp•10'WEST IT.rm: .. o \ .�!. -• ATE WATER MAR[ mom ratmm b nr®moa v m sun m asav PM 610 w \.�.-`•.� .`.Ii • , IDDUELY ELEVATION SO 9mrm m esaYr a mua.rJ n»®w°.-,ra$ \ nary eram To sbnm n�10 mAorozr mmlms ns mnm SS;a \- //,,, •92 `.1.`mgf CONTOURS FROM AERIAL PHOTO • :n•°,�,.,y d.� +'i It 04TED LEi mama m°bum cam m'wmi®ym mo ns rmmman®nmm T G -.E RentOnemS '3•{ ` — .\ v. ---'- am OaPrr marls.y®a mil.Elea Sri-- • o so 00 92 °°`-u \ ram m 10101.600 OP r®mulaar w mr nasm cm1mr 0 616 .]i i•,\ aar mar 53 M.v mON 066 m 6amXe°sar 1 m PROJECT SITE. •- ° o �q, `` \ ymmn1m°.umcmm NM 16 0.0 C010/6.116. M.r°m w mmsa°r a rea an marry m 'Y \. r®r aaava m m m°u uaze • • twat .°ee 8 `\ ` ' \ am.n m rem err m HMO;meym CO m 03 011.10010111. arr YAK { Y .ago \,`` .`•\!3 � VIOTSCALE r--lzoo• Do _ - _ .w6 9 O. - _ .�]� • °°.°4e9 ..es (4^/�/ \\\4 \s\ : - --9F — _ — '�9\ -EnsrnGeoNraaeRs _ �� - /1 , a�1t�) 1i ° - +_l`it I - _�» r0.. •.9` `- \ `\ ®-mSYING CONCRETE WALLS �'- i�/��'� '� z9:1 , I —� —_�71 \� e s • , \\\\ `\ H D I =ms DTGDIRLDnes •II/�I( ; m5TD1G CONCRETE WALLSCI ,,�. �� -_/I,.►.---- \\ \\ 7i� I4t.,. TO BERELLOYEDRTP.I �� '°2 LIIFIT90fNOR[ ' C;� ;�'�` \ \\1e,a\ c =msmxcoETEPADsQf1" ir, v/,di .J:, • \ _E>osTeec rEesrwTNorr� y .Ne _ � .' � ++ . , _--, i' .,• IDR�EM FLOOD PLAN_ ......... ph.* \\`.., ..,` \\�/ 1' ••DE REM 1� .v �.>/ at�,. .J9e 1/ .row awl .aoa °p • • '?-r,___>T•IOI YEAR FLOOD PIAfI +�4` ,'rll '�' 1, / p i . �__ �\ \e\d e\ ;\ --_II 8 PROPOSED CGnTDuas • rr� `\ \\•Jt .,�o.):s '''IN,,, , / allg : - .wa 1� •�, ivy.\ - • sacVII w� / A �' "STOC[•L6S ` ' �`�. / e .J9r1 ..zs \ `�\ \ ---tom__ © • \ \r\ �• .aw iki7.9 1 ta \\` •_� _ - 1t-7444414,-, us 1696 \'\ I\V -` `�� � —� - ,�G� / .502 .J92 aJ96 .n{ \, ,\?\` •\\,, n SttitC' `4.1 " I n22.v ' �__.J1y-1 , a .469ill \•\1`•i\ ;\ •F FILL TO 1/AT _ _ �� _ ►� 11. • rlallia .Je9• ]e] 05E -f4/1.,, 6-:-°''''.'.41i104 .t•-:-Ti. 51". 1.1.: EEI Pr- . `\`ON PARR PROPER �� ==`= — y►t�� __�_I_��y��� �������S��� I, .:. - `�\ ..114 A APi'ROXI.TE a:i TN BDtmT. / - �____- ' ` —� ..or �` I ]e� .y ' / \` • ' \ SEE E 1� -- _ Y m__- • APPRO[MArE LOCATION LOCATION ®Erna CEDAR RIVER '��� �- 1Q1 DESILTAnosi i• ` POND 7101/ oil.- I___ II ..Pe9 _ \tea -\11\\11 ° q .. ,L..I a .~: . .i , --- - - ��- - ---------- e ; T eoNv /9� �rC SEE NOT f, N �• \\ Pj ...I'4— _ 'r) BODY.LIME EST.0•SC.DECREE NO. 9007E `� \ r 1 - -l EXISTING VEGETATION ALON' �� v CITY OF R E N T O N ° • • THE RIVER CONSISTS OF GRASSES G i ii \ D. • DECIDUOU97REES,T7P. •0 HUGH O.GOLDSMITH A ASSOCIATES,INC. DR►w wiY RNT Or PUNLmc WORN• • . , �r9 ?V LDIIj;/ \ s.• Coniulang Engineers•Surveyor.•Plonnw. GRADING PLAN for tit :�: z : r' _, g731y ''+ y \� �_ STONEWAY CONCRETE INC. `yt •t '•' al C � � 8 S of eGl2a \1 ISles Maple Valli NNY.Renton Wa. 9�OSS .�.®.a.,... - in.- umvuw 0 ARIL .Ara 010/60• ..„,.,,.Rat°.+ {mi—L_o.�- . . . ._ - ' . . . . • - . -.. . -- • - - • . . . . . • . . . . . ____.. l':. - • • . . . . • . ' . . • • .-, _ • . _ .. .. . • . .. • \ '. • • . • • • \ss •s, - . .'--- -- . . _ ' - .-,,, .:,; . ... . . .z.,.. ... 4- . .'• . .:. . . . • 1 _. •• ,592 .\\ • . s .. -.•. . • ... .,_. .. " . ./ • •,. \ • . q'• . \\‘‘ \s s. - • . • . •r3 2 0•- -- . . • • • \• \ . . , . ., 4 \\\7'•\ NCTIES; . — .. . • •. - 1.Satre*Is ti be haled pia to any rola calanseral setSy at 124 a ' • • •az c - • sly arineral saltaraalla Gar Ma. • • . .,,... • 2.St fines Sote mataid*NOW the cane ol anaualan. . " " . . . , - - i ..........-. • . 0 co co • • .ca z ..1 - . ,sse,\ • . , _, . . . \ . • ,/ •4.. . . •49•1 1 \ •..ss\ N- ..-•. . • \\ \\ .. i • lial a09.0 • . a4SA • . Ss \\ • 0 O. I., .. ... .. . i_a r--) • LY EMBED EV-Lai MD C01 01E1 iiiik\s\s\\... •••••..W.2 Payee . -....... FILTER FABRIC SECURED TOFDICE I ....: . \ s s It\ . :Arc,Ss • • ...,.., 7._. ,ccoe---... FIRM FENCE POST(M ' . - ....,-.- '... -.,,..... - --".-11--1 1r .::::sr-11. ,,,.._, . . - • WIRE FENCENO FABRIC '•-• a* --%-,--7".77-..lee... OLE......;-.1,..„0111Mimii 1 • '0\ _-'---------------:••,...._ . 4,...;;;. SECURED TO FENCE FORTS - . ilypr a• • ! 11--7--; . 8 °I1C) 11111r0„ Sas\ . .. . . •' 14 .% . \\ s s ' :.• , . • ,,f11 TRENCH-t sun DEPT. . : . *i, 4) •32.7 g I -- II kNO! . .32.4 • \\\‘•\ . .- • . TOE FABRIC 111110 TREN01 ../ . • ‘, •1111161111111111111 -----. • \ . .-- BACKFILL WITI NATIVE MATERIAL • i b ,.„. i. . ,.... 106,____ ,_........ ____„... , , . . • ....- -i*.---.0?-- ....,r--- ,---7---/ i \ '..:.,...\ .. --- . • ,4 Ckli ''',1, / Palma ,....--•.--i.K.-"Nil /."... c(t9... \ • • Ns\ , SILT FENCg SCALE \.•...\\* 3U • -. ,,,._-_--- \ \\ \ • . _____...i, r_ . _shi___ •NOT .1 i . . .. - • .. . •313. V-. ..uni • .../...•\ /. i '----7111. .. ROOS . i --'7.11.1"- 7P't--3111 • 0102 •\ • . .:. "';'; /kw 43.t:/.. N. • U elliM ;--....r----- .ews ilk/ ‘...if fr,/ .• •190 C 4 ‘:' l'''.' ! . ens •s,. . „ soo_ r ' i i ' . a •39.1 MILS ' • \ . . . _. . •10.•- \ • • . • • 04 . - _ DAD111:11.10' .MI • OILS.r . , . ' • . ., \') \ \ N 444, _ ,, . • ):...•, ., VI - k,0 . VI. .. see V.-.. all .39.8 ' NOR • -• \ . )r .... •Dm ••29 ji \ • \ • - • •1 , . \\s•, \s.- . - ....7 •DRA \\ s %, \ &'- .:.*‘..% •51.B . .:‘. . • • 1 'NOW', b . ; '....11111.1111v..i.......1..- lh _ M.11.4:'.:_:-_,11"•••.) • f _ ,. ..,_, s . IP -"4111.1111111 ••" ,NMON --_...=.1 0 ......--- '-.7,7,-.",==.-,_--- 1101 ., 0.1. mas in). a.1112 I ' --\\'N\ . s I ., \ ss.\\ I_ __ .-7,-.______-_-- -,-,:__.__-;j •i_ __ - .- X...__ . 1 X Pai - 291910101032 07117N WM ' 1''' - , .---....•••••-• .•.., --._ . 1111 N„ • SU NOW 4. 2>_•-•.% f•je-••"':•. Wr...."tv714•L'• . :41. '‘..\1 s\•• N., • SILT FENCE' i. -. •Sit 4 1;',"--114,111166--....`E`1,....--"...... •-.7.---r ., ''''"•••••-. '..o e Ai Aoriv:::.,0:5,,-. ,..n•.. ,!,•• ,n. ...5.,.. , __ .......... ......... , • . i ETAILI • ' '7!''' 1-fl r ifl ..3.•:-A7- - ---:::-=...-.41.:."-. • - _ „ 1011 1 \ IL: '. Ali•Ilii.- . -''' ' 'InZZTE-O , . . . w.r"„:;7.•-•A:•'4..•• • • ,,._ .0,4,-... ...________. ,."-•,.;--, - r,. •..• -- .N. . • -0, .• ••••: ',' .. ' N., ii ' '' ...• : ' •'• '-', . i ••••,..! A% .. . , . 1 . . , ' . , .-.. ••• '. lib.- •-,..^.,, .•-...__..... - . ' 13'' • :i:. .7)..7 -;;;•• "i:.'' . - 1 -7 . • . . •---... ....... -,--...,..............._ *a.- OBS .• -"----f--------------------- , •'-----. . • .,..- ..___ . ., ... '..4‘'.- .. .'•''''4\ %4N11111111':' l' \ '11 l' • \ t.''''.7 Y :;..,:-.4,''''). • _ 1..<.. ,..,, / -......„;_. ... . • .\ • . .•.... / *NOV.LINZ Cat IT KG Went NO. NOOn S . \ • ' -1 . . • ' -___ CITY OF RENTON . c,SCIN • • _ ..0 HUGH O.GOLDSMITH&ASSOCIATES,INC. __________ OP 90•LIC Wost• .•, - 0,• Consulting EngInsies•Surveyors•Planners - . • N T.EECP. . I N • • • . . .... . giveaway Comma . ,. Z•2 li n--..,..;....,,, It•tm.•,_-4, . !• - I a ) ,,,, ,. 1 .. . . .. N,„ tiwz i'''•-........_ M5 Nape Indy limy.Ranieri Me allOgg •• ik 411.:,, 1 k,,. _ , a - _________. • 71&:1_......1... . . .- 0019•49,4.••••••••••••. -• . _ . . --- -- , . camlomMO-DIALam__,••'••'-•5'.. ••••••••••'°-••••4•- . • - . t, iNA IIIMMON - NO MTV sW1100:11,--- wort-2.—ar-1.- 7. b� z3+\�sza N3000 • -1 - \ . • •% \ . . : • p Ya 66 QS4 ``::\zkus:;\ \ • N o ,� \ s9�\ o— A+ 4a45 9 10. . Ar .A..K_'. .eea \i • ! ..-0, - - -e.• .• Ilk:\•* 1 f,;()NV 1111W/"'..".". ,0%Aril. . , s 4\ , , lap ---]...„....„....:!--_______ _-_ _. . .., 7,a 1451 7 -up- •32? .3i 7 11 HO 6 totii(t%k . 1 w.21 dill a34 5 it._, Ilk . .405-J TI rL r '� Aga NOb J�,i .40+ W `e`. . 4 4 Q , .... �• ♦\ / I—S— '7 S ,6 .wz •.00z _ 1 ' \ \ ♦ ♦\ rrr •39b 4I 9�{1p V fY $ ' ' IVI ♦' - - .392 \\ \ 9 . \ 4, : - ••36. *.xi. .Se+ .leg \ ♦ `♦ '...1111886. ..- ARO --r-----',.. A. m ... �\"�. Sln 'i 4.:.s.‘, • , �� ��� • APPROMATE SOUTH BDR �� \ ♦ � SEE NOTE 0. / 1 � .• ! \\ ♦\\ � E ••0I • • C. D A R ��, ` • RIVER ���`�_ i 1 --- — may \` 1 _ ". Ili-6 LP- app -•.259 _ • _. SEE' rS sour:. .29a \ "‘‘.---Z-s \O F C !b BNDT.LIKE EST.0T S.C.DECREE NO. SOOTY �-_ • 1�� _ CITY OF RENTON r O'HUGH G.GOLDSMITH 9 ASSOCIATES,DIE. O[to KTle[NT 0/ PUBLIC WORK[ \ ra r Consulting Engineers•Surveyors•Planner MILL 1013:496°67 UM wnu• Of MINI at g S g, o, Bcrzl �.. sTONEWAT CONCRETE 9IG - eseNNm 61•159-3103_ MA .i.z.•i_2-c r.ru • o.+e ".• es-vrrr-.amr, PORigOr-".— HE/dskl 102787 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON OCTOBER 27, 1987, AT 9: 00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: XSTONEWAY CONCRETE AND CITY OF RENTON PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT Application for special permit to allow the filling and grading on 3.88 acres of property with approximately 53, 000 cubic yards of material in order to bring the property to grade with the remainder of the site, and substantial shorelines development permit to allow said fill and grading within 200 ft. of Cedar River, File Nos. : ECF-005-87, SP-005- 87, SM-002-87. LONG 'RO' P' 'TNE' , P ONG-, :i W SHO: 'T) Appl 'c io fo - Long P • • Pro. ies Shot Pl. • - pro•ert loc: ed •, t-e nor , de of 27th - r- - in - vicinity o he :MI 900 bl- (1300 west of ind Ave. ) , File No. : PL •t: -87. AYERS AND HOFMAN (RIDGEVIEW ESTATES) Application for a preliminary plat approval of 7.7 acres into single family subdivision of 25 lots. Property_ocated north —of N- _ . 24th St. and north of Anacortes Ave. N.E. Fare—Nos::- ,__ECF-057-87;PP�67=87-7----- Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Building and Zoning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS, ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON OCTOBER 27, 1987, AT 9:00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. DATE OF PUBLICATION: October 18, 1987 1 -w- e0 CITY RENTON o"'l " BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director September 24, 1987 Richard Padrick Hugh G. Goldsmith & Assoc. , Inc. 501 Lyon Building Seattle, WA 98104 RE: Stoneway Special Permit for Grade and Fill of 53,000 cu. yds. at Maple Valley Highway, Files SP-005-87, SM-002-87, ECF-055- 87. Dear Mr. Padrick: This letter is to inform you that the Environmental Review Committee completed their reconsideration of the environmental impacts of your application for a Special Permit for Grade and Fill for property located at 1915 Maple Valley Highway. The Committee on September 23 , 1987, decided to finalize the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated which is dated August 3, 1987. They also wanted to clarify their earlier decision noting that the required 30 foot landscape setback from the mean high water level (plus landscape berm if ecology blocks are used) would begin 35 feet west of the existing sedimentation pond rather than at the sedimentation pond itself. Because the Environmental Review Committee felt it was necessary to clarify the setback and berming mitigation measures imposed, they decided Stoneway should be allowed a seven day appeal period. If an appeal is made, it must be filed with the City's Hearing Examiner no later than 5: 00 p.m. October 2, 1987. If there is no appeal, we should be able to establish a tentative public hearing date before the Hearing Examiner for sometime in November. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call our office at 235-2540 and ask for myself or Jerry Lind. e Envr me . al view Committee. Dona d K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE:BG 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 \r • 0 r"ti:s'W 01 ;f CITY OF RENTON MI 44' BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director September 24, 1987 Jane Ryan Koler Casey, Pruzan & Kovarik 18th Floor Pacific Building Seattle, WA 98104 RE: Stoneway Special Permit for Grade and Fill of 53, 000 cu. yds. at Maple Valley Highway, Files SP-005-87, SM-002-87, ECF-055- 87. Dear Ms. Koler: This letter is to inform you that the Environmental Review Committee completed their reconsideration of the environmental impacts of your application for a Special Permit for Grade and Fill for property located at 1915 Maple Valley Highway. The Committee on September 23, 1987, decided to finalize the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated which is dated August 3, 1987. They also wanted to clarify their earlier decision noting that the required 30 foot landscape setback from the mean high water level (plus landscape berm if ecology blocks are used) would begin 35 feet west of the existing sedimentation pond rather than at the sedimentation pond itself. Because the Environmental Review Committee felt it was necessary to clarify the setback and berming mitigation measures imposed, they decided Stoneway should be allowed a seven day appeal period. If an appeal is made, it must be filed with the City's Hearing Examiner no later than 5:00 p.m. October 2, 1987. If there is no appeal, we should be able to establish a tentative public hearing date before the Hearing Examiner for sometime in November. fi If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call our office at 235-2540 and ask for myself or Jerry Lind. 46Envil nme al iew Committee., —; Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE:BG 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 CITY OF RENTON ,:0 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director September 24, 1987 Ms. Anita West, Vice President Stoneway Concrete, Inc. 1915 Maple Valley HIghway, Inc. Renton, WA 98055 \.' RE: Stoneway Special Permit for Grade and Fill of 53, 000 cu. yds. at Maple Valley Highway, Files SP-005-87, SM-002-87, ECF-055- 87. Dear Ms. West: This letter is to inform you that the Environmental Review Committee completed their reconsideration of the environmental impacts of your application for a Special Permit for Grade and Fill for property located at 1915 Maple Valley Highway. The Committee on September 23, 1987, decided to finalize the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated which is dated August 3, 1987. They also wanted to clarify their earlier decision noting that the required 30 foot landscape setback from the mean high water level (plus landscape berm if ecology blocks are used) would begin 35 feet west of the existing sedimentation pond rather than at the sedimentation pond itself. Because the Environmental Review Committee felt it was necessary to clarify the setback and berming mitigation measures imposed, they decided Stoneway should be allowed a seven day appeal period. If an appeal is made, it must be filed with the City's Hearing Examiner no later than 5:00 p.m. October 2, 1987. If there is no appeal, we should be able to establish a tentative public hearing date before the Hearing Examiner for sometime in November. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call our office at 235-2540 and ask for myself or Jerry Lind. (71. 7 Envir m ntal Review Committee. `-Y' oldx)e i Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE:BG 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 • • ti � a r ;^ + W , • • C A R APPLICATION NO. ECF-005-87, SP-005-87, SM-002-87 APPLICANT STONEWAY CONCRETE & CITY OF RENTON PARKS & RECREATION DEPT. PROPOSED ACTION APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT TO-ALLOW THE FILLING & GRADING ON '3.88 ACRES OF PROPERTY WITH APPROX. 53 000 CU. YDS, OF MATERIAL IN ORDER TO BRING THE ,PROPERTY TO GRADE WITH THE REMAINDER OF THE SITE & SUBSTANTIAL SHORELINES DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO ALLOW SAID FILL GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS GRADE WITHIN 200 FT. OF CEDAR RIVER, 1915 MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. • THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (E.R.C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES ► DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. - AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL RWILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON. HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., ' OCTOBER 5, 1987 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION. NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Rvionme ntal Review WASHINew The Envirr onme C Committee (ERC) has issued a Revised Determination of NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED for the following project(s) under the authority of Audrey Donne r ,being first duly sworn on oath states the Renton Municipal Code. The Appli- that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the cant(s) have completed a mitigation pro- cess pursuant to WAC 197-11-502(c). STONEWAY CONCRETE AND CITY OF RENTON PARKS AND RECREATION VALLEY DAILY NEWS DEPARTMENT: Application for special permit to allow the • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition filling and grading on 3.88 acres of property with approximately 53,000 cubic yards of Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week.That said newspapers material in order to bring the property to grade with the remainder of the site, and are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six substantial shorelines development permit months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published to allow said fill and grading within 200 ft. in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King of 005-87,87 River, File Nos: ECF-005-87, SP Count Washington.The ValleyDailyNews has been approvedFurther information a Y, g as a legal infrti regarding this action newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for is available in the Building and Zoning King County. Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2540. Any appeal of ERC action must be filed with the City of Renton Hearing Examiner by October 5, 1987. The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the Kent Edition Published in the Valley Daily News , Renton Edition X , Auburn Edition , (and not in September 21, 1987. R2523 supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period.The annexed notice a Notice of Environmental Determination was published on September 21, 1987 R2523 The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $ 21 .j2 . Subscribed and sworn to before m this 25 L relay of :pop t 19 07 Notary Public for the State of Washington, CITY OF RENTON residing at Federal Way, "� King County, Washington. )L�J C; 15, V VDN#87 Revised 11'86 0CT g- 1987 J BUILDING /ZONING DEPT. IL i ij ii 11 -- 8 t9r/ f ; wv / - Wil--- ir ✓U ,, or- e# _. 0 i , g -. P -6'44 r.447), 4/4 , „ 1(1; . • (11 114141441/ 6,1- P 19/"vV1 P IN aII /a. ' H"reir7f-'1/1" 2 y ii -Y7(041/ -rixi 11 Uke 4' III 40-p-ti-v, taw/ Ft/re/Ph ...,(1 V ' ,,. •. 1 9. f 1 if f I r,V1-1) I - r NM r fat 4--4/I _ LiViamf- / Iii r" (W. tiff 4 f_ ' ,'/,, '.',7,1-..)-- ,�/ / f "i,' pg_i_4/4:1%,fr /r,' Ii?r'1J ', iI /?�- , ( / %rid jr ' ,y- __ n '{i `r , ) r / _ 1 ",--- 'ter ` r � r - 4' c >� , t :oV°'i1 / - '' ,.,' _ ...;, t -2/1/ eve)1/2-y, ----7„yoenw, ia,i, .441(7,, ,, ,,- ..,5,_1.,..;.tt,. • (Ht.0_ -,4 , . ,-/WirtigisliNtd,r,W -Arrari"- iii#2, I',(Tr r'l ill /.( // j r�Ar '4 �, + i; 1 'i, 1F.- ? /`gf- „ , J 1 1 LI!it/ iisze,,,,cie op,,FLaii-f, G° fr , mli corp,H,-,,j,17 , n ...........___ f . „ ._-W:ir C I rr r II 1 irpol elz-4., tavt, ,, ,,,, ,,,,ir,r, ,,,,,,,,,,. , ,, , ,,,, Ffrie-Wf1/ (I't Ri 1_ . , Mijill/p If Z iviril,ild jprowl, '111. ('ti .: ,,,e, 0„,,,-,,, ,,,, 're ' - vy ifr ii/cf- I* ,fr ' r 7ry zi ,;�� w i1 i s g� 74:3::„ ' it 2, L2� 1 L/fidiro - 6/AIWA' 0" 1 �`, yr v E 1 6__ /_ -y)._____//.) ' I ,,, , ,..1_ 4.-N:piLo .Affyli i- -11 . r....._,......._7__i_ 1. I r 11 „ ,. , I %,*.lUavU co tia CITY OF RENTON mu. c; BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director October 20, 1987 Dick Padrick Hugh G. Goldsmith and Associates, Inc. 501 Lyon Building Seattle, WA 98104 ,4 Re: Public Hearing, Stoneway Concrete Special Permit 005-87 and SM-002-87 , Dear Mr. Padrick: A public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner has been scheduled for October 27, 1987. . The public hearing commences at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. • The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the , staff report will be mailed to you before the hearing. If you have any questions, •please call" the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2550. Sincerely, R � Donald K. Erickson, AICP . Zoning Administrator . DKE:DB:csb:dsk2 LtsStone 200 Mill Avenue South - 'Renton, Washington 98055'- (206) 235-2540 w430 CITY OF RENTON kv'f BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director October 20, 1987 Stoneway Concrete, Inc. 1915 Maple Valley Highway Renton, WA 98055 Re: Public Hearing, Stoneway Concrete Special Permit 005-87. and SM-002-87 Dear Sir or Madam: A public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner ' has been scheduled for October 27, 1987. The public hearing commences at 9:00 a.m. in the Council" Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. The applicant or representatives) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you before the ,hearing. If you have any questions, please , call the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2550. Sincerely, Donald K. Erick n, AICP - Zoning Administrator DKE:DB:csb:dsk2 LtsStone • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 • 4$ CITY OF RENTON "11. BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director October 20,' 1987 Larry M. Brown Western Pacific Properties 13975 Interurban Avenue S. ' Seattle, WA 98168 Re: Public Hearing, Stoneway Concrete Special Permit 005-87 and SM-002-87 Dear Mr., Brown: ' A public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner has 'been scheduled for October 27, 1987. The public hearing commences at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers _ on the second floor of City Hall. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing.: ' A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you before the hearing. If you have any questions, please call the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2550. S ' erely, Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE:DB:csb:dsk2 LtsStone 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 t$ A:^ CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director October 20, 1987 Jane Ryan Koler Casey, Pruzan and Kovarik 18th Floor • Pacific Building Seattle, WA 98104 • Re: Public Hearing, Stoneway Concrete Special Permit 005-87 and SM-002-87 Dear Ms. Koler: • A public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner has been scheduled for October 27, 1987. The public hearing commences at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you before the hearing. If you have any questions, please call the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2550. Sincerely, • Donald K. Erickson, AICP .Zoning Administrator DKE:DB:csb:dsk2 LtsStone • • • 200•Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 9805.5 - (206) 235-2540 4'$ ,4 CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director October 20, 1987 Everett Ayers and Eugene Hofmann 23404 98th Ave. S. Kent, WA 98031 Re: Public Hearing, Ridgeview Estates PP-067-87• Dear Messrs. Ayers and Hofmann: A public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner has been scheduled for October 27, 1987. The public hearing commences at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A. copy of the staff report will be mailed to you before the hearing. If you have any ' questions, please call the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2550. • ( Sincerely, Vl Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE:DB:csb:dsk2 LtRidevw 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 NotEnvDet/Dskl pub92187 NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Revised Determination of NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED for the following " project(s) under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. The Applicant(s) have completed a mitigation process pursuant to WAC 197-11-502 (c) . STONEWAY CONCRETE AND CITY OF RENTON PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT: Application for special permit to allow the filling and grading on 3 .88 acres of property with approximately 53, 000 cubic yards of material in order to bring the property to grade with the remainder of the site, and substantial shorelines development permit to allow said fill and grading ,\ within 200 ft. of Cedar River, File Nos. : ECF-005-87, SP-005- 87, SM-002-87. Further information regarding this action is available in the Building and Zoning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2540. Any appeal of ERC action must be filed with the City of Renton Hearing Examiner by October 5, 1987. Published: September 21, 1987 /4 y / EIN FtLL • ( . • • _ yam. _ � . ..._ # \IP ^ , I 'Focir uW i`lAk .11fr 16-7rj‘A •t. ---- ---N-....„.....,„.. Mk y '1 . � =' dz. , \ . , . . . ZIN • . . 1.41'41rammA"AtArir �rr���i,�C,�r hl�sr iirfrirj"lilAr ,r>i�" - '" - ' '`'w .1„.,,,w„h% 57j i '..-1,111 - 0 w 'ifrillipp,V -•%.Ai liswoh., wkimeoh., Apr 1 s `111 A 4..-^. ...1 tIVAL r7(e)et. .) NN,X4;14# Adollip.. ....leg _, , ..., _ % cc 4e t.. iimprAn,,, I. k \f/o.5.4( 11L-0'7 4\.-. 4, lt, wiPNK14;,,, — - , . „. ... ... „.-yx , ' - ID&— ' fi„._ -sc.-.7 , 5:2:7T. t....AkLr., a.A.F__ -----: ...... ------------N--------Nsv-------L .....r..m.._..........„.3 .4*N***.N.N • 67.,,,,,501 1 /� '--�`» •• C'3 flU .gTl ,. r , � s d-diN ✓z i , zrmAr"' ; � .. �Q � � `i- % » ' z� � � " I I Cj � 1 i -. F F' ,� .�..I r. � mo' li � ' I1 + � , � { , F : '� II Jl � � , ' !�rI!(I 1'-'w Ls ,4,14 n1t4 ` o•'. 1 P 1° i . I ; , y r ' + I II I , I I ! I �S7t: ' °o � mI; ii .`ki::1.''''...""P„ il 1 4 ,....„„ „ , , :. fir , i',I1..: f , I 11 ,,d1 i' 0 1 tLy,t., i' •-z.., --1,_ , I . ' .:,„ . " ,,,,,, it? 0 I li 8 1 t, V'I- =ii - 0 6 1 , , ,, , -,„ -, fl.14,I le or k... *: , . . **...- — ...,-- p 0 0 ; 0. ' i '.1 4.,' -' 'f', ' fl e 3tif ii°', °F ill' ' t 1 f - it P 4 8I 1 -'_F ° "i7 1!F �° JJ{ e a ^- yj id 1� ' : -® " 5 f . ° 4 1,±i l i ;i,;-,„ q jig-i(;5 i °t - out •. ' `c M3' :tY i e ye] i gn i' 1 7• 4ii• I )gp�y]1j'+/� i 1 I - ros b._4 it sR. !- di\ i s 0 f P .. , }_ 'j I I F �3�p7 i �II t�//I ti , '' ` i I� �f EMI: i;, 110Ed+ F 3s .,.. 4 I ly rg i I t1' 1 t, j r ! 161'4.1 i' r'P�{ F =:/ 1 .�� i rill! ICI I F � � � S p P Air, I /., i IJ � �!1►' ' it /`sr.` f a f j � i' •�I ! lit 1DDD28 1 _.:": "-- : ( ' Pill l i ' /11.."; I r 4, . . \11\00101119/ flit , :11,I d ltiv ..„...../ , , AlOilit . i ,,,i,' i A , 10 A . / i. t oft P a ,ua li. 01 i, / 1 V , i\ If, i • / ) A , I \,,' 4 I 1 �\ l/ ' ; I 1 / /(,\\\ //)\ J//i\ , 1hJsØr44( , , \ , .„. i � I . A / . i OF R�� o THE CITY OF RENTON �� � z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 aelL BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER `O FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 o9��F0 SEP�E�c5 MEMORANDUM CITY O's- RENTON1,-:)) ECEUVE0 ,.. 2 1987 DATE: September 2, 1987 BUILDING ZONING DEPT. TO: MEMBERS E.R.C. FROM: ��/FRED KAUFMAN, HEARING EXAMINER SUBJECT: Stoneway Concrete Appeal Attached is a copy of the letter received this date from Stoneway Concrete advising us they are withdrawing their appeal in anticipation of an agreement they feel is forthcoming with the Environmental Review Committee. There appears to be no need for any further action from this office. cc: Mayor Barbara Shinpoch Larry Warren, City Attorney RENTON STONEWAY • • TUKWILA CONCRETE ACCOUNTING:9125 10TH AVENUE SOUTH • SEATTLE,WA 98108 • (206)762-2566 SALES: 1915 MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY • RENTON,WA 98055 • (206)226-1001 September 1, 1987 RECEIVED Mr. Fred Kaufman Hearing Examiner SEP 21987 City of Renton CIT 200 Mill Ave. South N EARINGEx M�Q ON Renton, WA 98055 R Dear Mr. Kaufman: An appeal dated August 28, 1987 was sent to your office concerning our proposal for upgrading our site at 1915 Maple Valley Road. We wish to have this appeal dropped. Our attorney felt this was needed before the appeal time ran out, but I have been working with the environmental review committee and feel we have negotiated the issues that were sig- nificant and both sides feel that a decision can be reached within the next few days without a hearing. I appreciate your help in this matter. Sincerely, Anita West Vice President AW:jao i 1 1 tio ,i;'1,,f- \ , gas) ���deem / / / \ \' / 1/ Trateeb Jo n , 4 R� Imo.:-:. "'Jill/100r ,' ► 1 /WOO Ii it , , dpli RIP i \ i //0 , tkril .k 'A fig,,,,, , , //0#•\,4i fl i\\ , , ,is Hit /\ * i 1VAri 1 0,i° I I! il pi kk j////2--:-----/l-..-- Aliii`\\ lig Id: tilp 11141,,iif- ii! \ i 1 ( A4). . 0 ri iBe ti) 1 . P1141-17:- li ' 1 AN''' 1.1,1 i /k titi--.1 ,1 Igi, 1 410!„, :vitifrii ,,, 4 4 lik: lif 1 7liti I, ft , , f�� J �pt f ifil:r1 it} � 4��1lr J, I.I�iI I 1 , y 7.dr al it jth1 , , *.Pe ! 1 II' f ' 1l I 4i 4m t ,f r't 4..*x i. p t ViLA Jr; !4,1 1 I 1N U°, � L' Jq , i :,4 . yg, Lli ii,f, k 1 .it , i6 .- 0 it f.:1 le i i Vci 1 ;=,.:3 . ,-.4 1 ! 6 1 i , „pd., i II i ...:L -;?. it - ir\i'L tleelci 1;,,4 i, , ,,:okiv „ ,t,,, ,I iti I pi* i U [} f9�•- �. l r jR: P p� Yb fI t. , ; . i iY._ ,�,, .E k / 11 1-• s:t f : • ifiNrez `T/1 . . - -_ltE4 il is ,: P ,, : -' r �,� t tl* .Y ill , , , 4 %-�, t ,•rE il I I 1 _' ;° �. I,,, o�o:.o, �e�� 4 I ,IIIJjI,i pe. : , j,, � I I , 1i1;1, ,,P ,, � I MKS .. y. —12 vra�� � s , • 1 ... ---_, ) . . . _ . - . - i 11 11-7 ____)/ 1 — . 0 s) 1 . . 0 cb - , n sg--3 74 _ I r c- , 51\40 r: ii: e.... •/ /C) '. 1 . ....-- •,.._ .-- /\ T . • • i . .. / - . A) . ... . . RI 7//7 •-• of` i - ../ . .; I / < - / . . C ,' • -'5 • . , . / `/Nt\ • 8 : • in . g ?‹ „.„ ,,„ wo ,„. ..... ......---------„_. 0 iv, i .. -- , , ,/ , , ... ......_,. , if At 61e1 I . .. .... 4- 1- .11E— ims • - ---%1 . _ 0--- LP 1 /:• 1 • X _._______-- ,-- • • - -—'II 11 NI--. ''') - - AA 1 •----J‘---- -i ' t_-..k---` -t57) .6. ! 1., 1- % 1 1:— i '—11—1 t ----1 1 11 !____J i___1.1____A—I 1- 1 ..,- - f/A": - 1 • I I . •,-.: 7 I) 11 • \ ,-, 7, ji)jiri.o ! ,...: ( -.4. NBA) EAMRGWEet4 i att.. \Y •':'. _ s 1 ' lith i f I 4 Igo% 1. 1\ 11. -ii 14 I-11° -1111/1.1 • 1 iililMik ( 6 -4- i V I . .7."----/------- , ---, • - i ( ,-i, • 4 I I'-;' Ili 1 ,ALIA111' 1 /ow,. . . A , i li, 1 Toliq 1 L. , ,01,;,L17.-----, iiiii N ,.. , • { 1 11 w''j , .1 ....:4.1 1 I I I\ Iii i ii ,ii;.i r ..t 1 . 11,1 I I al 4 ' ,- 7- li '‘I. tis .',1 II 'l''''' .. f•1 pi 1,:. i 1 / i ! I'r dalig Ilfg,ii, rd-r, -5_ gli - , : . -II 7 6 , 1 ! i ,• Will .1. 11111 ------ --• : t :r•-;,- ' 4.141 :; . .-41 •.• ' li i w ,-.t. ' ;11! ii`Pgdk-,711),,,, r; , If ".1;111f.14'k ill ft, I: •-;,-.. , 1 :' '',- il111 I,i;t1;ri-t-- -4 1' 1 11)V. 4._:'7.--;3717-! I --,i r . • ,--i. .. ' —, ,, , ,, 1 4,' ;6;,IL . ill • •-•:tlk ',:::1.: ii I 11 I-' f--.„ : fili 7. - i r 1 .4'; ' _ 'it 7 --'-'; f• ;-,P 7-! I j 1 4111.:_,:j' ;E:: ' 11 ' II : . ^"Ail 1 :'' ' '''''• k ''' ili...;.:.- 0 *'... t 1„- _,.- ' •'A'.' I'v 1-:;.- ''`q-:..It I, 1 •--if - lir OF '; 1' 1 4:::72 '' '-`' : • :- , , 2.-re- '::,1:' _',•-• k- 't ' if' • I; I 1.1)/ 1ii,-f • ' : ?,,,," ' .. ,,, , .,-_ . ''' , •- _1:: T---4. . , -,...- --1 1 [44 '4141 IT,'1 1 , 1.51: 7.. :-, ;. A-- -!...4‘ 2) F-'_. '1"tri-Lt!yfj. II . il , ;1 II _,--„. .. . 1111,_1Lf_ ,- r - • i : -:•\) -9r. • e!- , iii,',1- 1 e ' - r :! 11:4 ngf.'; 10:-"-,H :,.:2.1, :-'.- '4 r .1 s40-- 1 1 I li I, . :i,.i ' ;, ,..'le:1 1 I ' iiii j: .III,. ,...':,. . .1 --t I '1 ' d q.4, ,-. it..... ,. i , . , ib, 111) 110; : ki 1 h 71:, i 1!li I I ill/I f!III' I III I I: :'II ,1- TT-. ..;.'1;;;1-1 II I ...•.. i -Pu.ti. ,.. ,k.F 1 i i ki II • ' ' : li.'• ) II i ; 1\' yi , ''' ' -,1 51.0C1411' I - .......e..........,..„ %.,............... ,- uppl....emetkriAL-Tittne FLAVTINCIP , c-ezivz. e. !/. " , • /- - / f ) a , "I . l , yQQQ l w FL L L BB I v '°J�•a• . i• voi 4 • L ia ♦ ' '.• + • y Y, . 1= - V • r -0" p ...,,,,,, 4�+ � i . • , ----NN„.....N...„..„ \ J „, \ ' *4\--.......„ • - O/ ' ``�;,_ • `L.r[, Ars/J1JIi/ X.!''i!%`IIK.I,:/!'I�,R'�JC / F.-�.R. _ _ _ .. .- �F per!{/e� Niik zIll �t f . i ik;a.a, Ili .1\vv,„„,...0‘ ioi . 0 1e1U 1:7(90,1317) \ \ ----- ,,.- A ra r rt w e 'ram" "^ s, AfwEiIJ%/. J+s, ., y • DS/Dsk1 ECF00587 CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO. : ECF-005-87 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SP-005-87, SM-002-87 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for special permit to allow the filling and grading on 3.88 acres of property with approximately 53, 000 cubic yards of material in order to bring the property to grade with the remainder of the site, and substantial shorelines development permit to allow said fill and grading within 200 feet of Cedar River. PROPONENT: Stoneway Concrete and City of Renton Parks and Recreation Department LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Directly north of Cedar River at 1915 Maple Valley Highway. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C. 030(2) (c) . This decision was made after review of an expanded environmental checklist and preliminary site plan, on file with the lead agency. Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-2822 (D) Renton Municipal Code (see attached sheet) . These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified . during the environmental review process. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340. The lead agency will not act on this proposal for fifteen (15) days from August 3, 1987. Any interested party may submit written comments which must be submitted by 5: 00 p.m. , August 17, 1987, in order to be considered. • This Determination may be appealed by 5:00 p.m. on August 17, 1987. Any appeal must be submitted in writting stating clearly reasons for revising the Determination and must be accompanied by a non-refundable $75. 00 filing fee. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 235-2500 DATE OF DECISION: July 29, 1987 EFFECTIVE DATE: August 3, 1987 J./ 014 Ro ald G. Nelson 11111FA:r, : . Springer Building and Zoning Director Polio Deve 4.ment Director ll77 Ri -46 chard C. oughton Public Wo s Director DS/Dskl 'StonwyMM CITY OF RENTON k DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE MITIGATION MEASURES ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO. : ECF-005-87 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SP-005-87, SM-002-87 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for special permit to allow the filling and grading on 3.88 acres of property with approximately 53,000 cubic yards of material in order to bring the property to grade with the remainder of the site, and substantial shorelines development permit to allow said fill and grading within 200 feet of Cedar River. PROPONENT: Stoneway Concrete and City of Renton Parks and Recreation Department LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: CONDITIONS: 1. Haul routes and hours of operation to be approved by Public Works, -.Policy Development, Parks and Recreation, and the State Department of Transportation. 2. All fill materials to be certified as to their cleanliness by a certified professional engineer. 3 . Hours of filling are to be coordinated with the Parks and • Recreation Department. 4. A landscape/erosion buffer easement having a minimum width of I0 feet from the mean water level of the Cedar River and a northern setback distance determined by the drip line of existing trees along the river's edge and running the full width of the western portion of the site from the western boundary �. (abutting Cedar River Park) east to the existing sedimentation pond is to be provided to visually screen the industrial uses on the site from recreational uses along the Cedar River as well as to create an erosion buffer from Cedar River flooding; 5. Because of the fragile natural environment of the landscape buffer, fill materials shall be retained by earthern- berms beginning behind the landscape buffer; NOTE: If ecology blocks are used as a retention device for the proposed fill, they shall be bermed along their river side and shall be setback a minimum distance of ,],a • - o City of Renton . Determination of Non- gnificance Mitigation Measures 'Page 2. feet from the landscaped buffer easement identified in item 4. ,above. 6. All bermed areas shall be landscaped with evergreen trees and plants as well as soil retained evergreen ground cover; and 7. Additional conifer and evergreen shrubbery shall be planted in the landscape/erosion buffer easement for erosion control as well as to create an aesthetic visual screen of heavy industrial uses on the site. • r . r • • • . . - ,i! ' . fr F'l LI , yo • • • • 4 {I ( ' - e t • . Fr ''‘. - , le.-C—Tre-N,T10 NI WALL. N. • . -- \ -- AA . ''' --'N„„,..NN..........,.. °WiZiek T } o • ,. _,Altit ...44,, : ' _ �� r4rr - -AorAroxininiceisraCAW:AK:ar ow is\., -, -Jr.dr•Ar.iiri-lr,,„ , -, '.1. - f, •-,,,--0- • . •,, , iimulp._ lik, , MuitArri,litairl,1110 , i Wiliaritifigii] ,r. -c A 4.---.2 - , - .i,,', ., ' ' ' '. IN A._,-ilp.,-1,„\ i 1 1, : a , . . w , mir 4 .....„,,.._. , Nult ' ' -' -44‘ , '' i . . 'Ilk .-- ' ''' . ' ' -r* . '... - ' ''." : '. ' ' . ' 'Ilh'-‘14' '' -'16-0-.. ril .'\11C' rri7-.' '':111,-7_ .::, .' t'''' ,,':--..1`.,-._ kki. . -.,. ,. '-_' .. - 4 --' '-' . .‘ . ' - - - . ''. 1,,,,,. A-T-z... -- . --,,,, r_ r , r, -. Tt% ' , L * a wra1, • /iv ` - . Cr a^ � CITY OF RENTON '°LL sx BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director October 20, 1987 Dick Padrick Hugh G. Goldsmith and Associates, Inc. 501 Lyon Building 1 Seattle, WA 98104 . ' Re: Public Hearing, Stoneway Concrete Special Permit 005-87 and SM-002-87 Dear Mr. Padrick: • A public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner has been scheduled for October 27, 1987. . The public hearing commences at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. The applicant or ' representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. , A copy of • the staff report will be mailed to you before the hearing. If,you have any questions, please call the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2550. Sincerely, Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator . . DKE:DB:csb:dsk2 LtsStone . 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington .98055 - (206) 235-2540' ti 430 CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director October 20, 1987 Stoneway Concrete, Inc. 1915 Maple Valley Highway Renton, WA 98055 Re: Public Hearing, Stoneway Concrete Special Permit 005-87. and SM-002-87 Dear Sir or Madam: A public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner has been scheduled for October _27, 1987. The public hearing , commences at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be -present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you before the hearing. If you have any questions, please call the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2550. Sincerely, Donald K. Erick n, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE:DB:csb:dsk2 LtsStone 200,Mill Avenue South - Renton,Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 ID t$ CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director October 20, 1987 Larry M. Brown Western Pacific Properties 13975 Interurban Avenue S. Seattle, WA 98168 Re: Public Hearing, Stoneway Concrete Special Permit 005-87 and SM-002-87 Dear Mr. Brown: A public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner has been scheduled for October 27, 1987. The public hearing commences at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant .•is,.': required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you before the hearing. If you have any questions, please call the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2550. S ' erely, Ade"( Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE:DB:csb:dsk2 LtsStone 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 o 44% Ank CITY OF RENTON "'LL BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director October 20, 1987 Jane Ryan Koler Casey, Pruzan and Kovarik 18th Floor Pacific Building 4 Seattle, WA 98104 Re: Public Hearing, Stoneway Concrete Special Permit 005-87 and SM-002-87 Dear Ms. Koler: A public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner has been scheduled for October 27, 1987. The public hearing commences at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second , floor of City Hall. 41 The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you before the hearing. If you have any questions, please call the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2550. Sincerely, Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE:DB:csb:dsk2 LtsStone 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 \ �-•'c• ,rum ------- ,_____- ----- - --- Y= -h"• •-,_f1 n s iL.Uce " i> • g c i. tillzV ' n '` `' Q J �: III =1 c4 'ffi 1L1F � L. ' . RaI"ON � _ `` G-l ��r a V•J if" I ' IIto I l I s 'gag ° ',' -VI / a ! , � �9.-.4. 101 i , -:titi, 1 -4 littiffl' I i2n. 1-139. /./ . .. . ", . A =_-1 _' L . aFrq7- 1 11.• � v► r u -- ( "A—+rW , i— • - . A• µ5 __ - - I - t N NC ,/- \\tc75.--7-7-,1 1 „Lin gi.mossomi, _. ,! ..:..,. r iLtr--' ,7 ° • 5 J pr 3 IV ' . III, . V W • r 1' a• ` �, i4 N' t w, e \ . . '''' I a •- \ �,° ' ?/!• // -� \/ G -,s21 ° t ,.. t ° ' ///// irop el: `\\ PARK. t4.' \ _, u _ :°—_, f _m CEMETE ' CEDAR RIVER �� o 41tt - ��►;. s �� 1 1 PARK \ 95141,1t \ == *y" 1 1 1 1 r i o , :1- /y \ eale)0 VT e - .' e \ t 4 4 coo ,i,i4., Z. il PP- dia A t ,I, . i..9 1 : -,:' 4 ,,--tz4;--': fl.- -'" - , ........„ ., A \„,.\::,, , - ' \ --N 11.3 /2.-5 / 1\l' Ilk —: , 9 ,, f : ,',, 7' 2 mei: 30 • „.--,,, rin-p . -, , InI .... , ,.. ... ® "' \ y , _p_ ' )Ma a 51 �(?, , `' . p:A1' .r I - �\ ' �'1 ' 3 i zs ®- \ � I STONEWAY CONCRETE and CITY OF RENTON '�;1;; PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT_ . SPECIAL PERMIT: SP-005=87 NI STONEWAY CONCRETE and APPL I CANT CITY OF RENTON. PARKS DEPARTMENT TOTAL AREA 3.88 ACRES ` PRINCIPAL ACCESS MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY EXISTING ZONING H-1 .(STONEWAY CONCRETE) . P-1 CEDAR RIVER PARK'• EXISTING USE STONEWAY CONCRETE-INDUSTRIAL, CEDAR RIVER PARK-RECREATION PROPOSED USE INDUSTRIAL USE-STONEWAY CONCRETE, RECREATION-CEDAR RIVER PARK • COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN .- COMMERCIAL-STONEWAY CONCRETE, RECREATION-PARK COMMENTS THE APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT TO ALLOW FILL AND GRADING ON 3.88 ACRES WITH 53,000 CUBIC YARDS OF MATERIAL IN ORDER TO BRING THE PROPERTY TO GRADE WITH THE REMAINDER OF THE SITE. , LOCATED AT: 1915 MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY ' . - . • , • I •} f } 1� f'� „mac i • 1 r. w.+mECI Flt • - i tale LI.TOO • .. ✓►-/,�n`� •°��r vn.ia w r.»m+es: \ \\\. MINIM IRS ton M..1�/` T a \ `� a. aClxlip»9 • UN moan MOS4 �• I /t B - Ib:car ern or sltrNte•Y[Ibl•Mas•r)n Mel. \ \ _ putof•erWvrren<t°v anQshellDe ,tdtI«t.MenW»Mr.ero •a.B.«ey,tglmxleescones.e91Ds.urx.E.j p s WInQSOI- eX C - 11. unma0me Do[arstm.in. 9°um IWie ter renushunM vz earn.en,AIOO 11 `` P.1115 Poll I A ea les.2-Tat par aw. 0 •sad w Icchaa oven,.above rowa. L•plan/or few•location, lief POSTS . a _ G�fi1 Sfi a _ S C. rWOEIID \ x-U2.O.O..,phiq Oft less than z-«lbs.wr L.v. - onus seN 3vJ '\ "i Io-m-m meanMnt..�.TM re.. AptT«•nee pr Hsm. east I.AasJcap f sN�j O. �3L.s6PPI t In1 x� z a e. IYYSIus row W»De I-5.e. O.o. am.earOft le n thn 2.17 lbs. per»«al w:➢o0 s P41 • •t•'r 72 Iso•n.ato Cl \ \ r town W11 b rSal.!or saN mewr a-eM not. r nd post 3 Q 7a.V I LDfl nun Y\ \ LWCGI • fort. .m.go.P halo.tM eon 01 each corner. toll r •M mat .2 CL T Ss Onwta.m leucolha.-..........1. \ •All es trial Ned in tr.. of W,n 11N rant..shall M diagonally am m Ora.of adjacent lip past- a H.-- �', a L s0UbEE / 1FWL u- a_ M I I+1 -Lim'F.'1; tm tonni.: • •a. or a nt..cn a- ` ; �; ana \ •The bus pwial for N•oneaetw pI steal pipe used far to d s 111.inn.. riot of zinc e.t.a m him Tlstt/suet fittings aJ /L s. P �`` �i� Ornn WIl melon a nwirnznU oI«lie,lplr«I°n IIro.«c ".11 b 1.2 w.q.twee font. ,=A17 mlL x --- ,,, --- sv sus«a hallose fro.maid Ce See]Copan.Men Office Lei iss. Law \` ` • \• .Pet ml«ane on ubuer meta WII b awllM u pwlna blw.W .0'• 9A 200 '��� Q. alley.Califon.9Wd l ems-tea. us.......e. \\`•i • .rays flJ /% • 9' / _ • l ` • • «t Rb..Drew wn b Me-/,Pond alwlted. TNT than have • an x•for maid lint fete Wls b feted wipe Q «•Pisa ST //�` ".n o CF I• < �l R - .:°vi.m Imi:inai i e wipe iap`°itiiro:`0m i�°°teti�pr•a."tw."r. pressed R awl o.,ln,o w m.ern onus mi®.am pim..i.[n.. j '1 C 169) !' .,, P ` . ` \ fes of orlon w,. In tM can of.San v!a fr.pl.. see m• mu=6.3 • a 9 - „-1 \ . ,,\ 1•tG11nd p uul,na Imid•W aun1 . a awls fdr c.'mutlPo ab dipped�ismisad still Dan Wif M Oft lm sun Uz•t S/r' end • hero e•.Ipat o/wtep Is ds»wd p•]I-ImA pen M Iron tea. Iral«t antic bim,t. tan are u b Nnand Nrouan fabric aM e I 't�,. �9• y'QCIEY--='wA' N G� / \o •\ • \.`°0T.of gal°nic..abr.Mm[:iiw,,east onta oerisnain°a:i artro s.11 .3. aattn.ar OMliabgoats i'na osfor.pin ni w e,hands ao warm trued11 14 ma n. re' \`.s19. °f n lal•accordance O to 90 1.az spM,Ied Mnimfwr. • MRCS BADS �LN / O .o9z (/ . an tint rbnt Nun rnal.s car e�rel aa•»t1.u.l Val n chat ,pp�gl�mfied awi bmlm Mmi W!:u pmlQq teen na; \ice • •as / \\ \. , 1+•wmo,ipu z-once unvom eipna use. vu.e Wn M a an . >mm•r a. TM«ben W»b fl«tun La- C m ..,e, .�1\`J1 f A \\\\••,Pout•�In\. eeurl.YnudT•d whops m w me D°ttm. 3H•. Spac,aa m R!Wll N rt hat en tLn lP Intanala. >' >5 Renton HJi' n•B,,• �^ R OUR m.fae u ISTR.isnatl°n all and W»be Class I sal...by xill[,.. --+- o so NO ..9 x P°re0 `\ 'b1' P P•xYsp. - InnixM awl brat•bans shall b pmvflM•Mrs bracing 1s nwircd an `m. EMI ScR a •, / •.D.,`NpIS q o at\m pet nil°I msi•. W used:Ip roil er. ,:tut Il'b of; s,1Yfirt ,..'peso •PROJECT SITE > a \sqk\ eel m[UPS '� LCLALA6 AR soon +see 8 \ In r p n b preal/M Lr V."1 tta,n»«Lore tp non 4'Ta6-S'_-HIgH - -_ .q9 o a ` \ m:iniiadi o.'al..a a�an,-.pun tc. ,.a w M os tens a eawe • VICINITY MAP ° �e-15,0.c..{�� _ om\` `,`` w gale..w,N dna forgo/ tumiueltp or otherwise SCALE P=tIBP 0 C) 2 Q!t /J • • .tee 9 MSS NOS • ;---) ° a of'a n e, B 9 _ ' I i•\ :�mwl.»x.L9. p m ba y peso./abaal cone.. • e� ,� •' . 's�\ TM.nil :. ti.j� .\ Thisringsg zone Nall....7 gone coil stripe re aM stall hoe• zN•r`• vim• � Q- - � ...? ` \ •` coot.o s Nan OM w. r square root. Rooms.9 paw• •-. . �n _ �1Ki .��_ `1R5J - hedge rings Nall to p trod far MANI.um,m were to fabric . -2 >>>.=h �- \ \t` Ys9 ieunals'not erwaiq lP.• %T::1: po ! .ws'�., `• \ .0, Tension an nL'r"tact u b•f t...tax diced 9•trne./ cmless 5'�A'1E AO:4 04AL ,A* • f„' o `- / ® ;•`` \T' tl LJ •'�• \ re \\ \. \ C. n:.nuna - _ __ f L- -4 Fnsn•.G CONCRETE WALLS/�/� l qT9 '. \ ` I 5'7D PER r i .•2 d0 BE REMOVED(TYP.l 1�1 ce, II / iS ` -\ i :: \• \ • One pnsts 1«L�ii b w ed at not wn than 10'Inur«t•Ntlmnae,,a.le• PARK MP - v _ rA01 -•' .:aced In• ,t m. an . uN« one e . DIRP�1�, ` ' /•°a x TARTS OF WORE �� \\ . and i 1 "n.steel o 9w. Fabric no m es pro tlm boon t ➢ ` \ \ \ with II...Iv...tprovided steel N 9 p+ip•al tnm.tat cud at not•she /^� ` • a \'\ \ ,Q `\ Ira,ntere.e. b•tM..o ........”....• • � . 1-?�" �� lx �-- • \ AO B d .lz a .lh \ \ ‘`.'•Shalllsst el CM COa�ed.ir0 p9LrtepcpiT p°ls,uon. All ports to M set In a.Z„ , / _ . q `kilt.. \\m'.• w„tnu.�.ne m pen.rod tar,u n p.uie,t..m Lniml Rx.a • • 1 • w bona R for pull and carer msu. banes u b twee p ••� w w .>a: �-�•- DlG B ''•' to- > ; r--� ,to, «,°banal. f Nil Ir. A mna.1 r=ed wen iinn'of `few. of wnm tbnGp JO eaama car.re. Fall z v wed N F T+BE REY• all / /• 4 C•--� .aO .. \"\ \.. ,... .te tee.,m n Ions....e�01 few.and abrupt corner in at m Y 11 19s loos `�ion. Install ion tns r Roo uninl ane p q / • \ / t]] / z `/•J1 f •. a O L ��� 't 4°`-pen SOT.Ilw Oa,PULL Arm TxmlesAL PM t . • / asspp¢¢ k.7: 1I ►^_�\ , _-tom � •w2 • - Y \ D,qur Rini.Dap. Post...f N. went ..'« pas. YF, / ••_ ��� 5Ie i `: - uses V\ e• ° E' l9• s.�,r• T.MaT ( ,. 11\ • 1FF / , •`` 1..--q Q son a � • • a l.s um �\ \�� _ ,; _ en: vn.re .sea mdjnpna•ti\m cure ta b ntamiwe by \\\\\\\��� •]C^ :'C3 i`` �'- •59 2 Owr'• oswczm- Posts for ed'fabric sections Nall b eWd/a/In]d• 11.2 ,r�rz �3 ]99 yF\ wNt.emw rmtoy.nN a•.m1R moo.. EIISTM STOCR PILES \s \ • •y` .a12 i, . •42 S t Tomb j.spp cal,4 vtl•ne,1M rem ill peso m ROM cLr. ~. - \ • ponce as96 l Taapr•MedM Nit.agroalpulf N.,bon prmN,Tort um,a�:t• JI J��,t To WTl be team.m aids of li.boats as specified. fabric . �L- - / ` and u lam meta by ties spud at intan•Ts of m.per.than p••n/ i ):' xa•for w ran�nxpt,Mil .rod na«M u..N baanal . - •:T' ". - 9 1 , i a>e z / m/rp«ei Mt'a:yq ewrc./:po..«ii wit ti«.,m.,n ies.eH ii:w.e p� At ." "�sv�ry • a q e ape wco •r \ • "�,. .w'�r/ c / Y . ¢. .tees •J3 z •-°d .aB D lees/ has. • mid°r Im.e.m In m ism• cm a iwt. ' • .-,/'�y l% _ ~ /!'•�'i •560 \ ]e s fabbrriatioon and Am IDi:e,en of oatn,als rune...4.its»°d um _ _ '- f/ a&i t .tL' L,y; - .-._____ `le• ¢ ._- +aown3eweine.iimsaNei.l nrae ties-ova'.rem a ill, nnimM 1441 • �ER14♦•t J22 • ]0•J • .a:5 J:. d"' 1\� rem OF OYt9 n,R fUCi ytft ]b9 te` .� - -- : c_,.___\\ L. a GFWUN-LINK rER•GEr ... µYDROSEEDED WILD • -..R, -- - �.S -a '•��_A • -�L.I'IE,DEP�NE• APPROXIMATE SOUTH BORY N F_- •a,, ! lB O SEE NOTE a. MIX(SHOWN SHAOED/ `� _ \ oz �� - . .N 50e)�EE CEDAR V E �� � m \ I' l \:z \ \ 1.•sa.: •Li: F.•c=T.'�7L°O.G. R / __�� I \ t' _ _ .. Ria \ \ \ ,!---• .6,r 4,2 :r g9 ft \ • • 1: s 3 n^Q�_.lh APPRO�rMAT• a29, (�,� \ '1r\z\\ m •J•:?,A-'• • - ' :'"a'1' .. • frp*--- 44ka SEE MOTE E/SOUTH .DRY _ _.` \ \ a\s \• \ \•, g - T '-' SNOT. LINE EST BY Sc DECREE NO. 90072 ./ \� `` \ ... \\\-`•` ,\�\ \ • EXISTING VEGETATION AEON v CITY OF R E N T O N THE RIVER CONSISTS OF GRASSES B ` p OHUGH G.GOLDSMITH B ASSOCIATES,INC. DcaR■TM eNT 0I PUBLIC WOAR• r 89 CL PI_ e.:"e"• , DECIDUOUS TREES,TYP. • \ L.0 9 ConLull,ny Enpin.9re•Surveyor*•PIRnn.ra LPI�D.X�PC PLAN for 'Q` �� �-'"'y \ �� -...�` STONEWAY CONCRETE INC. '¢ �' ri 4 �' ,=t; I R 0 96121 �' 1915 Maple Valley Hwy.Renton Wa. 98055 atrar R _ -• •\ams� t4.�a :;E y PRAeaa 4e9f o,u i,6/B-f ^�ne [ • •I-•SO a..a•2A 11....1 LY ,..• pun A..RaYln 00SKI-y--«�- I • � i' ''" \ \ \ . ouzo so.escor \, . FUTUf1E FaMSHEDGRJIO@: ,�,r�.ST N four i 19•vte Q� 3 I �1 3P� - -46, ---- -- \ \ ,- r1�mBti6.'A _ fala'rnh m 08 •mamiRL nm®1®min¢T m m amwuYe•4a'm.131 • ez®ew®tm�vm 9r an m 'J(IOfI,_ NI:... 3C6 - • \`` ° Cam..l4�rm°m�Dw,o. 120113. - am.m 23007TM mnm ermm.m,rnennca®Of 13.02n,°mR mtua y Hits Port ajl 1. 7nle.__ i v®.,.Seem.ma 00000 vmzro v=TT mz�a.vs MIT m m env m,Surma zm®mane v N. �- ' O i 3 ; ,� f Lyp' S' .r 9LT ST E \ ` \ .o�v-mr m ma=0 69.6®2m min .u°�. on soon as rumour a u,a am u m»,r.ro®n turn eze®s tam- �•a _� N - -- _• _ q' \ue \ a.a®momamauro..9a.aauavy- 3 nl - ©T/� \ • SECUGHIM anar Ts..osom]®m r.>m.oust.m apt m a am�¢m u • e s.000�\OF +I" •+, NO SCALE DESILTATIN POND \ a.an..®.aa�ionmmvrnmmzr my®® • �,,an43.001700 m mrsmm mmma®a misr.emo.°m.. 1i0 SCALE ~ \ • rum 19027tn Imo m®m m Pmw®my war=r m on"amen an a rr�Ra O�RD•®�A a vm re..teae]a.ur MO N ma1T may 0.0 m mmmnr C®m ne la.f a61ma TO AN 0 �" t MTOLIV 1 BBm 70 BE CONSTRUCTED FOR LONG TFiDI EROSNN �(��' : \`�eJe \ a]zar oarro.a« �ni.:�a.�m m N•.,�..�,m 9.a.,]m.Ian.a..a.r.13031103 m.,a�1.:�' • 001 Sea a2raS PM airs m a771912-OA meaa 0100 aGR-W]T COM `""_•:+ ,T CGMTRGI,ACDHTDRDSEEDEDASF6197WWEOFC07157i1YCT101� \ ` \ usromv�mrm°r•mwmmwmnwmau®.r•m �' ��" { ]-• /pQy Y _ "/• a mmmaa.aurae o,m.mua v.m am.,ur em0007.,�P.M�,�.I.mcone.nr e„z o,]ear v.pwr m•a...L a -„•1 F ! �4 .z z / \�`. Im m m tma am a ra uea avau®ae at v m um rn a.uum m mu mz.l®rom a n m Doom n w m_ .anz vuam m.a.'� t -s-' '' ..,.. \� \ \ a®rt acmm n raver ®O.T. 00 0311100 03 MD 07100 r zo.a cue • man TO a a4r u MAUS, St N - -. .m m ann.Lm m eu6.aea PALM ma6..6mara m MO urn .,�, - 200 9/.. ,1 \ \�\s•y HMIS• -,._°6'_`_'�_ -- • maom�a�emazav Warr mu im mvua u-r,moazrm ' � / I.FINISHED SURFACE TO Be I t72 LLTS S. m 6073�m �,• • 1=��� i •''I - G�Q • .\t 2.BANEADJACENI TO CEDAR RIVER TO m mva area m a,�ISO ;,..----`9•' _�'•4L'_ ----�'A` N `\\�.a�f\ BED SEEDED T PREVENT EROSION. onus rawer�T 710 03 • Emma Arm a.•.rs czar m oa8er Cm MM.®DT 010611 v m Tor .•'. �! ,... p . i" \ .`•\9••-,.:..-. Iera1 RATEV MARR m▪om m T' m urn 4$081 0 ®as 019 07 ymu9mmm na 09 �� •.9z Al'-••EBIAIELY ELEVATION SO •f 10 \,S`. mum,amour v um ro vaz razor1 nar MID-amt v - W ut - �,..-4 b a�,,..+" - I•\..: • .e• 4-•EL i•.• CO#FOUHS FROd AERIAL PHOTO ®r mws m as m a :iT•o..,..or. `p I� .-- i �� .•-. .. Lai __._ _ momu ova®®as.®man°.m6v2Mo>mazrwurom s ue.m 7 ' _ "`�• !.Rento ill -_9' _` o.eo no / .nz °^••e ! \ •\\.`;.` • cv® zia.TSAT mare.am�iw�mi�ar� Tmmir THAT rim ma.r m�—Elem•Sctl t ,s,r••\ Ia •1 - \ • \ . vvm002097 Pa me WIT 40a W 60m219 TmavT Lk If am mamma OP PROJECT SITE .• . a �R,• I/ ♦ \ I' Tor vv.m m sm maw.m T.Emu u00* .nee 8 \ \ • ••\, 001 v m my m mma omv m m.env urn - ... ..90 • \\.\ .`` `^ III SCALEna ier 0 O - AK . i• .e 9 \ \ i ili - �� •••.a•.e9 .M9 499 A��'i1.`.\\ LEGEND • .- I. 41k1-= \ `•.• _ -EEIST=SPOT ELEVATION S__..-_...I°• i 1i a w-�;LS+� - �```-, C�\ 90-•mSTIXG CONTOURS I + • • III, OW .,,,6 •A9` `,`\ \ ®-EXISTING CONCRETE MALLS II • j/4. 'i"%: - ci" ' `� �, -� �' \--1-- 1, ....- .' I \ `.```\ B .EIIS70fG PROLONGS ]r. 1 J, ,^, EEISTNG CONCRETE WALLS • ,-� Y __.. 1 .. ��; C� \\�` `.\'��/! " TO BE REMOVED NWT •nz Leaner _i�'w�`;��` \ \ \ C -EXISTINGCONCRETEPADS • 4001111010.1111111111b � �; ���9'I '• ♦ego. t 2-` 7 la ` .w e I v �n� m ``�° -COMM YECETAT10p �� imp- _1 ,. 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN \.\` \ o �1 r • l / -. ]9e .e.i ro \`\ \ \` -n -tea YE U1 FLOOD PLAIN aoT • _ ,�a` �� ae] ik....._'� •v9 i / O �� .�. i�.�._ y \.\°\�6` ;\ -- ®-wmPOSED CONTOURS WU t__ ^-'r��ly� n t iA y(, .]zs `• / �I;�^ .•°z 0032 ,- mow`.`\ \• \`. \\ ] sa m. I• A m 370CR' - .\ ' ^,\o r� / .-. N ••� .as9 eP .a9v .u2� N2e• \� \ \ \�. • 0.0 e 9 I 1...er\---, 1 __,..A441 •30 2 • / I • ar R '" �i 'a 1 C� •q9 ! •. • . . -----... lijilli -� -: `1 \ .L • ]e] • • • •P FILL iT - r_'� �� \r.��� .�Wrl� � ��� 399 ' 092 ` , , \\I \ y 111, ON PANIC PROPER � _ � ��- - --- �� A TE : TN DORY. , aaO- • SEE N• E a. , E tom ~` I ii-N\ DA R R ` .wiAPPROXIATE BEM / VER• APPRO> 11TE IOCATH LOCATIODDES)LTATION POND �1 .sz I - Irk%• - • ▪ Oed, IR _ .f..J v +». . . .'i , \\\. j - 1� •:!'1•.1 `•) , 'SNOT.LINE EST.BT SC.DECREE R0. 90072 �_ ` r` ..N +,' v - EmSTING VEGETATION ALON'- �� - CITY OF RE N T O N• THE RIVER CONSISTS OF GRASSES • DEPART-•-- O. PU•LIC WORK• 1'• � D.' DECIDUOUS TREES,TYP. •0 HUGH O GOLDSMITH 8 ASSOCIATES,INC. V a� 4 401zgy \ •••• CommpNq Engtnoarm•Swv9Y01f•Pt•nno,. GRADING PLAN for • ;� .-;•• •• 3��? t y �� �` 3TONEWAY CONCRETE INC. • •-• • e, .I J,, c , • F. g of BGi PI 1915 Maple Vdl� ay.Renton W0. 980SD �� , :• 1013.e111 0 YTS. OATS •. 9e.ar.-1__°•-. - _ d6 ni.�e9r .• _ . . -,,- . . • . • - • .• _ . - ' • . . . .........._. . .1 • . . . . . . • .._, .. . . . . • • \ . •. . • • . . . . . . . . • _ . . . . ..t , • i.4. L.. . .._-------- --- • q• • _ . ....:' .- '. . f0' ,,;\ i . . . • • ' .• I r . • ‘..).... .. . . .. . . .' , •••• . . • . . . . . a 431.0 0 . . _ . . ' q•• • ‘\ ss , \ . . • '-I. . •.. s \ i . . N . - ' N \ •,'\ \. . . , . _ 4' \ .1Lis•\ • . NarEs:. , .. .zz • .. - — • 1.Sli hoer Imo to incalod pkr io Nay MINiM CCCOUCISECI odivty al go.cr- • !. ' \ . \ \ . . • , eay=maim solblynirrCoColirFrier. .. • . • v012 ' c> \s\s \ . • • • " ' 2 Sit taco to be tolinhired froyOrsi the corn d ozoludoi. i • • \,,• • - • • ." . - • • • . • .. . . . - - 0• eo co -. it,ME ••• .. \sse., • • . • •• ez. -,, .. \ .. ...\ r • . - . • . \\ \\ , •.. - .41111 * . .. _ - . . ; jii! .... • \\ss\ . . , . . . , - . of_,I • . .010 .\\\ • FIRMLY EMBED FENCE POST(METAL al ilig leocol • illik\ \t`s\ -....... . C)' • " ili-. • ........„.„.2 . .•••••••-• well' ...-.-... , P . • .- \ . :,....r.,0 • . -- ill'11- 4-.---t'.... .ilob.--fr-M..." .."'41111,.....,_, - L • I .--- * • --m----r --w._-_--,-... .-tm.11,11,11moggit - . eir \ -0\ mimmul........_FILTER FAO.RIC SE;LJE:::Ormlz.CE...i:s: _ , . • 4D __ , . • . •-4 il ,e _ . ,‘.... ,gi ....-C MIR DEPT.. • . . ....7 I - • -'' Toe RAMC INTO TREND. . . • ' IV% 1/ , . . , • - ... ..i.i..• . . ,Ilf d- o4/444t.9 I.Vikia1l0l,4,,e#ga t tr,,bV'e,,,1 o."4,7,A0,4 1,1)1•'-',r•I4.I'P.') O' m i.m.s ..•.. ,A..1)1II.3b •..-- k.Illl0a1b21.5..-k,• \... / C.O is1.1 . •000 i.i.,..,l."... :i- a•M-_A__.._.:_. il.lall110/1110.-1 21 .\ ,s-s.\\\•s.s:•-0,\:\\•\\.\.\..\\\S I..:LST..•,\'- FENCE : ./ , ; , s:, i . . , R.A •CAFILL•M. TN,N .•.A TIVE.M ATER.I;A L i \ 1. s,\. . • • *'* ' %\s / • 411•111 t•-•'--- _ . , •ILIA Mal • -).' . ' \‘‘, s• i MAI 1/4‘M4 '' s, .• 'i .• . .M0 m0• . '• '; - . _ . _.,01.5 \ • • \ . .... .... iicili, - .,.a . 1 • . . ,,,,,:, \\\\\\,,s,, \ Sr Na... kV- •lajill \MI lir , . sled I..... AIRE .311.11 •‘.• MIAS .,N \ \'N. '•N.. • )E., , \ • s Ns irdilSIIIIIIIIIIII. . r , — ,-• — _ __ . - - 1 . • \ . • i A - ._.. . 1 in WM/ Alla • an. :-..) , r 710.3 '1 NII/P0.-•-:•41._\\ .,h,. • . , • \ _,iis, : \", '• . 'talk -- " L... .02 ( ' e jge \‘\ s\\ ,3-.-- "Ihn - ,,=,2 .7.-..___ _,...s....,.......... -- ,-.iliai.!: '..-•• - Malk .. .• ' • . - -- • amiciarsiii sans score . ,--,-1..Tlyr-•- -.-.1e...?,.q-:;'---"-'7,::• :..tio,.— ----------...... ----- .. i. 300 It SEC NOTE 4. -•C ...-t,k' ;••• - . -1,`'.1.-. '..', .."...., •,,, ,,,„.....r................ . ' , .,,. "..: SILT FENCE' Z •• .••• --•' - -•... -r .• . '4.E.0 AS.-in 4 4, • ‘ " ' -.• - - '-Z"."t"------ ""\---.7"""..... • - ---- y -•olg 1 s\, . - - -_,, (SEE.EMU • • . . ... e dp, .. 2::',..•.:. • -- • '. t'.:- Vi i" ': ',. .01111tairt ......... ___,---... •••.... . '•i- - . . t' ir.r.1:47.4.-.1 7i- - • . ;••-- c47U1'....i. . . • . -• ',s , . '".....'"--...-.."•'-...--...------ .....---..._....._......_ . '"4 ••••--___--:___ lii-:-- '.::. ...., -- ----.•--..._ • ,---, "...;''''..; •' . i'l .C.-A . - '-'..- r.:••• 1, , • ' . - . . '. If- • - . , I i's,•:7 i I 'S,,,,i ',_' . ...?'j: .: • r: 4. • , .. '• L , -.---- . . • . .'N....as • .; 3 • .. 1F-.. i'...`: 'f• "-- .. :•. • . .. a...--,... ........... ...,,,,.\\7,, ,,044.1 IINAtilik\ i: .. i / .. , .. ' •, • • ' • W 7.-....____ . VI \\N / . • -..... , ... •• -. • - .. / (ME IOU ENT GM 6C.DIME NO. SOOT! ••••,,........c ..... . \ , • • • . • .......• • CITY OF RENTON .... . • •- . ..0 HUGH 0.GOLaSMITH 8 ASSOPATES.INC. .......... or ru•Lic Prollit• . .....• ... .. if • D.Pio e.fi...,„ . ..-• Consulting E4Inimn.•Surveyors•Planner. -•.-• CS . . • I N • .i MRCP. • . • , _ . •, . drdo....t,A 2 ! 1 • .... . ,....p .-.1, -- sZEr"----.....,._ MR Nmpis Vig Ilms.Reed=Ili.RIKIES 1 ' i _ v• -I , 44.,..-* , 41/41""...'+'. I r `'•-•.-- oaro_enamaiss__ ram ms--_ et ____-___._ ...ma..e.am. _. ...e . ‘...- . . ...m.amrn T, ___ I 1 . __ _ - . _____. . • . • . -km. IMMMOMM: ••' IMF 0001. 0amm APPIM0•00• - • . • • •e�000 'f \ _ QP -lr N. \``e25 \ o 4369 .C. \ \`Viv\ • • / \...a N •• \\ 9is\\ , • .92 • \ `\ . 119. \ GO ••.6 _. � ' eB ,8 \,'• \\RY .•oili \ 0 0 .(:.).. , - .e9 + J% J:r tal t —■ �41 \ \ i071 el 71r 1 s•a .�� ct,. ..,. ., \ 1 * .31 Y __....„.-.-.0"'-,.: ill ' !ti •f a]e Cili • � 1�u�� .aoz \ \\ \\ v, . a33.5 "ft pir • I. .C9i8 ,. r I J��. / .xYi . .]99P .]9) .a� .G29 \�\\3, \\\3 •3' 9•.a J9a a '\ J•e Jot / ' ilk- / \I, \\2341 \ \\\ \ \ L_ i * __ .aoz �\ ` ik \\:T\ \ • • AD _ Lill' a] • APPROXIMATE SOUTH SDi1T. -- _--__-_ -• �i•'�` _... To o.......... ...... \ SEE NOTE o. / C,E D A R R/ V E R ~�' zr'�` — 1 \. •ol ii as. • 'J., _ a `C• 1 ; ...s.-........_ Is: SEE • 't sou ''41 . 71.i-011111L\ ' i • SNOT.LINE EST eT SG DECREE R0. 90072 �_ •`_ v CITY OF RENTON D S PARTMMMM BP PUBLIC WORK■ r O HUGH O.GOLDSMITH 8 ASSOCIATES,INC. ®�®� \ •�•• Consulting Engineers•Surroyore•Planners •au�TO�••L•.YAP \ 8 � o� Bcml —~� ArNraN o.�RAM - la STORMY CONCRETE INC. `,d Iw.o n 9-3-8� rus-^ 11J ON 0.0 O P K e JIS nu .••.._ . Aq, et00001 eV APPN. OATe AIPebleD eNfeY��P.�� V•.w•ttsn•r.nw •••� .d�.^+R•m.L LAW OFFICES CASEY, PRUZAN & KOVARIK MERWIN E. CASEY 18TH FLOOR PACIFIC BUILDING CARL PRUZAN SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104 JOHN F. KOVARIK OF COUNSEL PHILLIP T. HUTCHISON MARTIN A. GODSIL (206) 623-3577 WILLIAM J. MORRIS HUTCHISONRICHARD A. ACARREGUI DAVID G. SHENTON WG RY R. RE EHLERGLISHT CITY '�F RE GARY R. ENGLISH PROVIDENCE WORLEY Aug RE �6ust 28 1987 C E MICHAEL A. LARSON JANE RYAN KOLER10) ALIG 2g 1087 Fred Kaufman, Hearing Examiner BUILDING Te City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Written Appeal of Mitigation Conditions 5 and 6 Dear Mr. Kaufman: We represent Stoneway Concrete ("Stoneway") . Stoneway requests that the City reconsider conditions 5 and 6 which were imposed on this development proposal upon issuance of a Revised Mitigated Declaration of Nonsignificance issued on August 3, 1987, by the City of Renton. Stoneway appeals conditions 5 and 6 because these conditions (1) were not imposed in compliance with the requirements governing the imposition of mitigating conditions which are articulated in WAC 197-11-660 and (2) constitute an unconstitutional taking of Stoneway's property in violation of the taking clause of the Fifth Amendment, as incorporated against the states by the Fourteenth Amendment. These conditions also violate the Ninth Amendment of the Washington State Constitution. Stoneway also appeals imposition of these conditions because the City of Renton did not timely issue an initial threshold environmental determination and, thus, was without authority to impose these mitigation measures. • I. FACTS Our client operates a concrete batch plant located at 1915 Maple Valley Highway in Renton, Washington. The site is presently zoned for heavy industrial use. Cedar River Park is located west of the batch plant site, and the Cedar River runs along the southern boundary of the site. Stoneway filed an application for a grade and fill permit on January 27, 1987. On that date, Stoneway also submitted an environmental checklist to the City of Renton. Stoneway applied for a grading and fill permit in order to fill 3.88 acres of its 13 acre site to bring that area of the batch plant site to the same elevation as the remainder of the site. Creating a more even site will allow Stoneway to make more effective use of the site and correct some drainage problems. In connection with r , Fred Kaufman, Hearing Examiner City of Renton August 28, 1987 -- Page 2 this filling project, Stoneway will also finish installing a concrete block wall around the site. A concrete block wall already encloses some portions of the site. However, in order to completely enclose the site, Stoneway wishes to extend existing portions of the concrete block retaining wall. It is necessary to enclose the site for security purposes; small children who utilize Cedar River Park, which is located west of the site, frequently wander over to the batch plant site. This circumstance creates a dangerous situation which must be eliminated (see Appendix A) . Because a portion of the fill and fence is to be placed within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark, Stoneway also filed an application for a substantial development permit on January 27, 1987. \' The Renton Environmental Ordinance requires that the City x issue a threshold determination within either (1) fifteen days of the submission of an environmental checklist or (2) twenty days of the date that an applicant provides additional information about a project. In the present case, a threshold determination was not timely issued. Although Stoneway filed its environmental checklist on January 27, 1987, the City did not issue a threshold determination until June 10, 1987; on that date, the City issued a Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance ("MDN") . Stoneway requested that the Environmental Review Committee reconsider mitigation conditions 4, 5 and 6, which were set forth in the June 10, 1987, MDN. Those conditions read as follows: 4. The north river bank is to be rip-rapped to the 100-year flood plain elevation. 5. A fifteen (15) foot maintenance/access easement parallel to the Cedar River is to be granted to the City which could function as an eventual link between the Cedar River Park and residential areas to the east. 6. Additional conifers and evergreen shrubbery should be added to buffer the adjacent Cedar River Park. Upon reconsideration on August 3, 1987, the Environmental Review Committee eliminated the above recited conditions and imposed the following mitigation measures: y ' Fred Kaufman, Hearing Examiner City of Renton August 28, 1987 -- Page 3 4. A landscape/erosion buffer easement having a minimum width of 30 feet from the mean water level of the Cedar River and a northern setback distance determined by the drip line of existing trees along the river's edge and running the full width of the western portion of the site from the western boundary (abutting Cedar River Park) east to the existing sedimentation pond is to be provided to visually screen the industrial uses on the site from recreational uses along the Cedar River as well as to create an erosion buffer from Cedar River flooding; - 5. Because of the fragile natural enviornment of the landscape buffer, fill materials shall be retained by earthern berms beginning behind the landscape buffer; NOTE: If ecology blocks are used as a retention device for the proposed fill, they shall be bermed along their river side and shall be setback a minimum distance of 15 feet from the landscaped buffer easement identified in item 4 above. 6. All bermed areas shall be landscaped with evergreen trees and plants as well as soil retained evergreen ground cover; and 7. Additional conifer and evergreen shrubbery shall be planted in the landscape/erosion buffer easement for erosion control as well as to create an aesthetic visual screen of heavy industrial uses on the site. The MDN issued on August 3, 1987, specified that the conditions 4, 6 and 7, which are recited above, were imposed to (1) prevent soil erosion from occurring and (2) serve as a vegetative screen which would screen off the industrial uses on the site for aesthetic purposes (see Appendix E) . However, the Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance did not specify what adverse environmental impact conditions 5 and 6 were imposed to mitigate. The City of Renton's Environmental Official, Donald Erickson, stated in a telephone conversation with Jane Koler on August 13, 1987, that conditions 5 and 6 were imposed to prevent the concrete block retaining wall from adversely impacting on views from (1) the edge of the river and (2) City trails across the river from the Stoneway property. Fred Kaufman, Hearing Examiner City of Renton - August 28, 1987 -- Page 4 The environmental document for this project (e.g. , the environmental checklist) 1/ did not identify probable adverse impacts on such river views. The environmental checklist and comments from various City departments about the development proposal only focus on one adverse aesthetic impact of the project. The environmental checklist and various comments state that the filling and fencing proposal will have an adverse visual impact on the view from the park and Maple Valley Highway. However, the environmental checklist does not express any concern about adverse impacts on the view from the edge of the river and from trails across the river from the site. Presumably, no concern about such aesthetic impacts was expressed in the environmental checklist for the project because the edge of the river adjacent to the site is located on Stoneway property. Because the edge of the river near the site is private property, which is owned by the applicant, the City was probably unconcerned about the view from that vantage point. II. CONDITIONS 5 AND 6 DO NOT COMPLY WITH THE REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE IMPOSITION OF MITIGATION CONDITIONS WHICH ARE ARTICULATED IN WAC 197-11-660 A. Conditions 5 and 6 violate WAC 197-11-660(a) and (b) . WAC 197-11-660, which implements the terms of RCW 43.21C. 060, sets forth various restrictions on the City's authority to mitigate development proposals. WAC 197-11-660 states in relevant part: - (a) Mitigation measures or denials shall be based on policies, plans, rules, or regulations formally designated by the agency (or appropriate legislative body, in the case of local government) as a basis for the exercise of substantive authority and in effect when the DNS or DEIS is issued. 1/ Richard Settle, a noted commentator on environmental law states: "SEPA conditions are only allowed to mitigate specific adverse environmental impacts clearly identified in an environmental document, that is, a checklist( or other threshold `determination document_ or an EIS." R. Settle, The Washington State Environmental Policy Act; A Legal and Policy Analysis, §18 (1987) . r Fred Kaufman, Hearing Examiner City .of Renton August 28, 1987 -- Page 5 (b) Mitigation measures shall be related to specific, adverse environmental impacts clearly identified in an environmental document on the proposal and shall be stated in writing by the decision maker. The decision maker shall cite the agency SEPA policy that is the basis of any condition or denial under this chapter (for proposals of applicants) . After its decision, each agency shall make available to the public a document that states the decision. The document shall state the mitigation measures, if any, that will be implemented as a part of the decision, including any monitoring of environmental impacts. Such a document may be the license itself, or may be combined with other agency documents, or may reference relevant portions of environmental documents. (c) Mitigation measures shall be reasonable and capable of being accomplished. (d) Responsibility for implementing mitigation measures may be imposed upon an applicant only to the extent attributable to the identified adverse impacts of its proposal. Voluntary additional mitigation may occur. The City did not follow the above described requirements in formulating various mitigation measures for this project. First, the City failed to specify the identified environmental policies on which conditions 5 and 6 are based. Second, the City did not state what adverse environmental impact the above recited conditions were devised in order to correct as required by WAC 197-11-660(b) . WAC 197-11-660(b) clearly states that mitigation measures must be related to specific adverse environmental impacts clearly identified in the environmental document on the proposal. Here, the checklist did not discuss the visual impact of the this project on views from the edge of the Cedar River and from City trails located across the river from the site. Thus, mitigation measures 5 and 6 are not related to specific, adverse environmental impacts clearly identified in an environmental document on the proposal. The environmental checklist only discussed the probable adverse visual impact of this development proposal on the view from Cedar River Park and the Maple Valley Highway. The environmental checklist stated: Fred Kaufman, Hearing Examiner City of Renton August 28, 1987 -- Page 6 10. What views in the immediate vicinity will be altered or obstructed? Stored concrete products may be more visible from the adjacent park and Maple Valley Highway. 11. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts if any. A six-foot fence with ivy on the west property line will significantly mitigate any view impact. A six-foot fence with ivy and four to five feet Douglas firs, at fifteen feet centers, along the north property line will mitigate any view impact from the north. B. Conditions 5 and 6 violate WAC 197-11-660 (d) , which specifies that mitigation measures may be imposed only to the extent necessary in order to mitigate adverse environmental impacts. Conditions 5 and 6 were improperly imposed because imposition of these conditions is not necessary in order to mitigate any adverse environmental impacts associated with this filling and fencing proposal. Although Renton's Environmental Official, Donald Erickson, indicated that these conditions were imposed for the purpose of screening off the concrete retaining wall which Stoneway proposes to install near the southern boundary of its property, it is unnecessary to impose these conditions in order to accomplish that objective. The thirty-foot landscape easement (required by mitigating condition 4 of the revised Determination of Non-Significance) , which will be located in front of the concrete retaining wall, will screen off the wall from the edge of the river. Hence, conditions 5 and 6 are unnecessary to mitigate adverse aesthetic impacts associated with this project. C. Conditions 5 and 6 constitute an unconstitutional taking of Stoneway's property. Because there is no connection between the imposition of conditions 5 and 6 and the mitigation of adverse environmental impacts, conditions 5 and 6 constitute an unconstitutional taking of Stoneway's property, which violate the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution, which is made applicable to the states by the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution. The conditions also violate the Ninth Amendment of the Washington Fred Kaufman, Hearing Examiner City of Renton August 28, 1987 -- Page 7 State Constitution (Article I, Section 16) , which prohibits the state from taking private property without just compensation. Recently, the United States Supreme Court considered when the imposition of a development condition constitutes a compensable taking of private property. Nollan v. California Coastal Commission, 55 L.W. 5145 (June 26, 1987) (see Appendix F) , held that a condition imposed upon granting a coastal development permit ("development permit") was improper and constituted a taking of the Nollans' property. In that case, the Nollans applied for a development permit in order to construct a house on their beachfront lot. The California Coastal Commission approved the issuance of a development permit to the Nollans on the condition that they grant the public an easement to pass across their beach, which was located between two public beaches. The California Coastal Commission stated that the condition was imposed to (1) protect the public's ability to see the beach, (2) assist the public in overcoming a perceived psychological barrier to use of the beach, and (3) prevent beach congestion. The California Coastal Commission also justified the imposition of this condition on the basis that the access easement was imposed as part of the comprehensive state program to provide beach access to members of the general public. The United States Supreme Court held that none of the above reasons was legitimately connected to the coastal development permit condition requiring the provision of a public access easement. The Supreme Court also observed that furthering the state goal of providing public access to the beach was improper justification for the imposition of such a condition: Although the state is free to advance its comprehensive program by exercising its eminant domain power and paying for access easements, it cannot compel coastal residents alone to contribute to the realization of that goal. 55 L.W. at 5147. The Supreme Court held that a development condition may only be validly imposed when the government woud be justified in prohibiting a particular development because of an identified adverse impact. Under such circumstances, in lieu of the total prohibition of the project, development conditions may be permissibly imposed. However, the court observed that there must be a tight fit between the development condition imposed and the adverse impact which is to be mitigated. Fred Kaufman, Hearing Examiner City of Renton August 28, 1987 -- Page 8 The evident constitutional propriety disappears, however, if the condition substituted for the prohibition utterly fails to further the end advanced as the justification for the prohibition. When that essential nexus is eliminated, the situation becomes the same as if California law forbade shouting fire in a crowded theater, but granted dispensations to those willing to contribute $100 to the state treasury. While a ban on shouting fire can be a core exercise of the State's police power to protect the public safety, and can thus meet even our stringent standards for regulation of speech, adding the unrelated condition alters the purpose to one which, while it may be legitimate, is inadequate to sustain the ban. Therefore, even though, in a sense, requiring a $100 tax contribution in order to shout fire is a lesser restriction on speech than an outright ban, it would not pass constitutional muster. Similarly here, the lack of nexus between the condition and the original purpose of the building restriction converts that purpose to something other than what it was. The purpose then becomes, quite simply, the obtaining of an easement to serve some valid governmental purpose, but without payment of compensation. Whatever may be the outer limits of "legitimate state interests" in the takings and land use context, this is not one of them. In short, unless the permit condition serves the same governmental purpose as the development ban, the building restriction is not a valid regulation of land use but "an out-and-out plan of extortion.". . . 55 L.W. at 5148 [emphasis added] . The court accordingly held that requiring the Nollans to donate an access easement constituted a permanent taking of the Nollans property because the grant of the shoreline access easement effectively involved a permanent occupation of the Nollans property for a government purpose. The analysis of Nollan v. California Coastal Commission, supra, indicates that conditions 5 and 6 represent an illicit exercise of the City's authority to condition development proposals. The standards set forth in Nollan for the imposition of development conditions have not been met. First, it is doubtful that the City could prohibit this development because of the adverse aesthetic impacts associated with this fencing proposal; the thirty foot landscaped easement located in front of the fence will totally screen off the fence from the river Fred Kaufman, Hearing Examiner City of Renton August 28, 1987 -- Page 9 and obviate any adverse aesthetic impacts associated with this fencing proposal. This condition represents the attempt of the City to extract a shoreline amenity from Stoneway which is unrelated to the mitigation of an identified adverse impact of the project. The analysis of Nollan v. California Coastal Commission indicates that conditions 5 and 6 constitute an unconstitutional taking of Stoneway's property. Here, the City of Renton has asked Stoneway to set aside a 15' x 430' area on its property for a landscaped berm. Imposition of this condition does not further a valid governmental objective and mitigates an adverse impact of the present development proposal. It is unnecessary to impose conditions 5 and 6 in order to accomplish the objective of screening off the retaining wall from the area of the river because the thirty-five foot landscaped easement area located in front of the retaining wall (condition 4) will serve the same purpose. Thus, there is no specific connection between the imposition of conditions 5 and 6 and the realization of a valid governmental objective. The property which the City is requiring Stoneway to set aside exclusively for landscaping and berming is prime industrial property which sells for $10 per square foot. The effect of conditions 5 and 6 is to deprive Stoneway of the right to utilize a 6,450 square foot area of its property which has a fair market value of $64,500. Conditions 5 and 6 effectively constitute a permanent occupation of a 6,450 square foot area of the Stoneway property for a governmental purpose; such a requirement is a compensible taking within the meaning of Nollan v. California Coastal Commission, supra. D. Condition 5 runs afoul of WAC 197-11-660 (c) because condition 5 is unreasonable. WAC 197-11-660(c) states that "mitigation measures shall be reasonable and capable of being accomplished." Condition 5 is unreasonable because this condition is redundant and does not serve to directly mitigate any adverse environmental impacts (see Section B) . Condition 5 is also unreasonable because compliance with this condition would impose an undue hardship on Stoneway: Condition 5 will require Stoneway to move its pumphouse. The pumphouse is located on the western portion of the property. In order to prevent either (1) children from playing in the pumphouse and possibly sustaining injuries or (2) the pumphouse from being vandalized, it is necessary for the pumphouse to be located within the confines of the wall which will be erected around the property. If Stoneway is constrained Fred Kaufman, Hearing Examiner City of Renton August 28, 1987 -- Page 10 to comply with condition 5, in addition to complying with condition 4 which requires the provision of a thirty-foot landscaped easement, then it will be necessary for Stoneway to relocate its pumphouse. However, were Stoneway only required to comply with condition 4, it would be unnecessary to move the pumphouse. In order to move the pumphouse, Stoneway would be compelled to incur enormous expense. Because condition 5 serves to mitigate no adverse environmental impact, is redundant, and financially burdensome, this condition is an unreasonable mitigating measure. III. BECAUSE THE CITY DID NOT TIMELY CONDUCT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW, THE CITY WAS WITHOUT AUTHORITY TO IMPOSE MITIGATION MEASURES ON THIS DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL. The Renton Environmental Ordinance at Section 4.2808 (B) clearly provides that the City must issue its initial threshold determination within either (1) fifteen days of the submission of the environmental checklist or (2) twenty days after the applicant has provided additional information about a particular proposal upon request of the City. Section 4.2808 (B) states: (B) Threshold Determinations: 1. Threshold determinations not requiring further information from the applicant or consultation with agencies with jurisdiction should be completed within fifteen (15) days of submission of an adequate application and the completed check list. 2 . Threshold determinations requiring further information from the applicant or consultation with other agencies with jurisdiction should be completed within twenty (20) days of receiving the requested information from the applicant or the consulted agency; requests by the City for such further information should be made within twenty (20) days of the submission of an adequate application and completed check list; . . . Here, the City did not timely issue its initial threshold determination. After Stoneway submitted an environmental checklist on January 27, 1987, the City requested additional information from the applicant on March 12., 1987 (see Appendix B) . After receiving the additional information on April 23, 1987 (see Appendix C) , the City waited until June 10, 1987, to issue its initial threshold determination (see • Fred Kaufman, Hearing Examiner City of Renton August 28, 1987 -- Page 11 Appendix D) . Instead, the City ought to have issued this determination within twenty days of April 23, the date on which the applicant provided the City with the additional information as requested. A City is without inherent authority. A City only has authority which is specifically delegated to it by statute and regulation. 4 E. McQuillan, Municipal Corporations, §13.03 (3rd ed. , 1985) ; F. Schnidman, Handling the Land Use Case, §2.22 (1983) . Here, under the City's Environmental Ordinance, the City has the authority only to issue a threshold determination either within fifteen days of the date that the enviornmental checklist was submitted or within twenty days of the date that the applicant provided additional environmental information. Because the City did not timely issue its initial threshold determination in accord with the requirements set forth in the Renton Environmental Ordinance, the City was without authority to impose mitigating measures on the present development proposal. Accordingly, when the City of Renton imposed mitigation measures on the present development proposal in its June 10, 1987, Determination of Non-Significance and its August 3, 1987, Determination of Non-Significance, these actions were ultra vires; the City was without authority to impose mitigation measures because the City did not do so in accord with the relevant municipal requirements. IV. CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, we respectfully request that the City retract mitigation measures 5 and 6. Very truly yours, CASEY, PRUZAN & KOVARIK Ja a Ryan Koler Attachments cc: Stoneway Concrete JRK/dmb LAW OFFICES CASEY, PRUZAN & KOVARIK MERWIN E. CASEY 18TH FLOOR PACIFIC BUILDING - CARL PRUZAN SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104 ' JOHN F. KOVARIK - MARTIN A,GODSIL - PHILLIP T. HUTCHISON (206) 623.3577 OF COUNSEL WILLIAM J. MORRIS RICHARD A. ACARREGUI DAVID G. SHENTON - •- - W. DIRKER EHLERT - GARY R. ENGLISHPROVIDENCE WORLEY MICHAEL A. LARSON - - JANE.RYAN KOLER June- 22, 1987 • Donald K. Erickson, AICP Executive Secretary Environmental Review Committee Zoning Administrator Building & Zoning Department - Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington- 98055 Re: Stoneway Concrete's Application for an Exemption From the Substantial Development Permit Requirements Dear Don: As you know, our law firm represents Stoneway Concrete ("Stoneway") . Stoneway operates a concrete batch plant at 1915 Maple Valley Highway in Renton, Washington. A portion of Stoneway's property is located within 200 feet of the high water mark of the Cedar River and is, thus, subject to the permitting requirements imposed by -Renton's Shoreline Master Program ("SMP") . Stoneway filed an application for a Substantial Development Permit on January 5, 1987. Our client seeks a substantial development permit to (1) fill a portion of its property and (2) install a fence around its property. In order to address a dangerous situation which has recently developed on its property, Stoneway seeks a letter from the Building & Zoning Department stating that Stoneway's fencing proposal is exempt from the Substantial Development Permit requirements. Our client wishes to fence its property immediately. fencing The proposal is described with particularlity in the attached drawings. Because the portion of the fence which will be located within 200 feet of the shoreline area will neither (1) exceed $2,500 nor (2) interfere with the water or the shorelines of the state, Stoneway wishes for the City of Renton to declare this fencing proposal to be exempt from the Substantial Development Permit requirements. IIIIIIrr Donald K. Erickson, AICP Executive Secretary e : Environmental Review Committee - - June 22, 1987 -- Page 2- It is imperative that Stoneway be allowed to fence its property immediately in order to address a public safety hazard which has developed on its proper-ty. , Recently, it has come to the attention of Don Merlino, President of Stoneway, that on a regular basis, small boys recreate in the batch plant parking lot. This is an extremely dangerous situation because Stoneway's business operation involves the use of large, heavy vehicles. Children are frequently in the parking lot in the late afternoon when these trucks return to the site. Apparently, after swimming in the Cedar River, the children go up to the batch plant parking lot to examine the large trucks. The large trucks are an attractive nuisance which draw the children to the site. It is crucial that this problem be resolved in a timely fashion. On a recent occasion, an agent of Stoneway's insurer saw a crowd of children in the parking lot and notified our I client that it would decline to insure Stoneway if Stoneway's property were not fenced immediately. Also, because the trucks constitute an attractive nuisance, Stoneway has legal responsibility to take immediate steps to eliminate this dangerous situation. If you have any questions about this development proposal or this problem, do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, CASEY, PRUZAN & KOVARIK C=1; ,,,,_4_,,,' _ Jane Ryan Koler JRK/dmb June 29, 1987 EXEMPTION FROM SHORELINE MANAGEMENT ACT SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT REQUIREMENT State of Washington Department of Ecology Shorelands Division Mail Stop PV-11 -- Olympia, Washington 98504 ATTENTION: Shoreland Management Permit Review • REGARDING: EXEMPTION FILE NUMBER: SME-004-87 APPLICANT (NAME AND ADDRESS) : Stoneway Concrete, Inc. 1915 Maple Valley Highway Renton, Washington LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Attached to document SEC-TWNP-R: 17-23-5 WATER BODY/WETLAND: Cedar River "' CORPS PUBLIC NOTICE NUMBER: N/A Gentlemen: An exemption from a Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit is hereby granted on the proposed project described on the attached form for the following reason(s) : Emergency construction necessary to protect property from damage by the elements; and Any development of which the total or fair market value does not exceed $2,500, . if such development does not materially State of. Washington Exemption from Shoreline Management Act June 29, 1987 Page 2 interfere with the normal. public use of the .water or shorelines of the State. This permit Is granted only _ for a - period of three months commencing, June 29, 1987, with the following conditions: 1. Said six (6) foot chain link fence shall be erected no closer than fifty (50) feet to the mean high-water line of the adjacent Cedar River. 2. If barbed wire is used, it only be located at the top of said fence, above the . six foot chain link portion, not exceeding a maximum height of seven (7) feet. 3 . That fence posts shall consist of iron or steel pipe driven into the ground. The proposed development is consistent or inconsistent with: Policies of the Shoreline Management Act. The Master Program. Donald K. Erickson Zoning Administrator cc: Attorney General 's Office Building Division Applicant DKE:JSM:csb:Dskl SME00487 OF I .�. ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON — DIRECTOR mop cb - MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.913055 • 235-2540 SE - .- - -. BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR • March 12, 1987 • Mr. Richard Padrick 501 Lyon Building Seattle, WA 98104 RE: Stoneway Special Permit for Grade and Fill of 53,000 cu.yd.s at 1915 Maple Valley Highway Dear Mr. Padrick: The Environmental Review Committee considered your application yesterday at its regular meeting and passed a motion to defer your application pending the submittal of additional information from you regarding: future plans for the site; measures being taken to control erosion, especially during flooding of the Cedar River; source and type of fill materials; traffic impacts on Maple Valley Highway; measures that will be taken to keep debris and dirt off City streets; potential adverse impacts on the City's nearby well system as well as its aquifer; and potential adverse impacts (noise, dust, glare) on the City's adjacent Cedar River Park. At the meeting, Public Works staff noted that a geotechnical engineer should be consulted ta review the erosion problem as well as possible impacts on the City's well system. They also indicated that the flood capacity review was not complete enough for them to certify that the fill would not affect the floodway channel. They indicated that "cross sections and hydraulic modeling using HEC-2 programs" should also be done. Information on haul routes. number of trips per day and hours of peak impact should also be provided. As soon as this new information is available, we will be able to proceed with your application. You may wish to talk with Bob Bergstrom in Public Works regarding the erosion problem. If you have any questions, please give me a call at 235-2540. S• c . onald K. Eri son, AICP Zoning Administrator 3555Z PclAso ,x/ Hugh G.Goldsmith %Q..) & Associates, Inc. #86121 23 April 1987 Renton Building & Zoning Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Attention: Mr. Donald K. Erickson, AICP Re: Stoneway Special Permit for Grade and Fill of 53,000 cu. yds. at 1915 Maple Valley Highway and Renton letter response dated March 12, 1987 Dear Mr. Erickson, Following is our response to your comments on our referenced special permit. We will address each issue in the order presented in your March 12, 1987 letter. 1. Future plans for the site - Some consideration has been given to the potential use of the site in a very general way. That consideration has been limited to discussions of the possibility of a hotel and small retail use. No effort has been made to evaluate what uses are allowed un- der the code or if there is a market for a hotel/retail use. The fill is being placed to improve the utility of the batch plant site. Future use of the site will be identified some time in the future. 2. Measures being taken to control erosion - The drawings submitted with the special permit application require construction of a filter fabric fence at the ordinary high water mark on the south side of the fill site, parallel to the Cedar River., prior to beginning work. A berm will be con- structed landward of the filter fence to further contain silt laden storm water on site. As material is placed it will be sloped to to a'desiltation pond on the north side of the berm. ' The settling pond will discharge to the Cedar River. These measures will minimize discharge of silt laden storm water runoff to the river. 3. Especially during flooding of the Cedar River - The landscape plan presented on the application drawings was prepared to conform to our under- standing of Park Department and Public Works Department requirements. If the bank needs additional protection from Cedar River flood waters, we will armor the berm in a manner similar to the bank along the Park-Cedar River ,1 interface, or with other protection satisfactory to all City of Renton Departments. The river mean velocity in the area of the proposed project, • 501 Lyon [Building / Seattle. Washington 98104/°(206)622-1080 consulting engineers • surveyors • planners r / ( Renton Building & Zoning Department Attn: Mr. Donald Erickson 23 April 1987 Page Two during the 100 year storm, is about 8 fps. The velocity along the bank will be less than 8 fps. Well maintained bermuda grass on the slope will ensure a stable slope during normal flooding. 4. Source and type of fill materials - Source of the material is indeterminate at this time. Material to be used for fill will be primarily excess earth from utility construction jobs in Seattle, Renton, Rent, and "King County. Some earth may also come from foundation excavation work for new buildings. The majority of earth in the region is of the Alderwood and Everett types. Alderwood soils compose about 45% of all soils in Ring County. Everett soils compose another 8% of all soils in Ring County. Both soils are of the gravelly sandy loam type. The remaining 47% of soils is com- posed of 35 other types, mostly silt loam material. It is likely that some clay silt loam type soils will be placed in the fill. If necessary the applicant will keep records on the origin of all material placed in the fill. 5. Traffic impacts on Maple Valley Highway - The average daily traf- fic on the Maple Valley Highway at the batch plant site is about 26,600 vehicles, based on an actual Washington State Department of Transportation traffic count in 1985 of 25,065 vehicles.1 Of that total about 520 are heavy trucks, i.e. trucks hauling gravel, concrete, and solid waste. We estimate that there will be an average of 35 trucks per day arriv- ing at the site to dump material in the fill area. Peak traffic is esti- mated to be 50 trucks per day. Peak daily truck traffic arriving at the fill site amounts to 0.38% of the total average daily one way traffic on the Maple Valley Highway. Generally, total traffic volume impacts of 3 percent or less are not noticeable to most drivers. The proposed new temporary truck traffic is about 6% of the existing heavy truck traffic. 6. Measures that will be taken to keep debris and dirt off City streets - Stoneway trucks have added side boards to their trucks to help keep material in the truck. All trucks have mud flaps which are cleaned regularly. All loads are within legal limits . Some of the trucks arriving at the fill site will be owned by private dirt movers and will not be under the strict control of the applicant. If necessary, trucks will dump their material at the edge of the fill area to minimize the opportunity to track dirt out to the Maple Valley Highway. Trucks leaving the fill area must cross several hundred feet of con- crete pavement before they enter SR169. Any dirt on the vehicle wheels 1 Phone conversation with Dave Oberg, Washington State Department of - Transportation, April 6, 1987. %ceHugh G.Goldsmith &Associates,Inc • Renton Building & Zoning Department Attn: Mr. Donald Erickson 23 April 1987 Page Three should be cleaned off before the trucks reach SR169. As a mater of routine the concrete hardstands on the batch plant site are kept clean. It may be possible to give a specification sheet to all non-Stoneway truck drivers outlining minimum requirements to haul through the City of Renton and into the Stoneway site. 6. Potential adverse impacts (noise, dust, glare) on the City's ad- jacent Cedar River Park: Noise - Noise studies done in the vicinity of the Cedar River Park/Stoneway Batch Plant by the Washington State DOT' show the following: Noise levels south of the Maple Valley Highway centerline for PM peak hour traffic: Distance Noise From Centerline Levels 200 feet 66 dbA 500 feet 61 dbA 700 feet 59 dbA 1000 feet 57 dbA Noise levels from construction equipment at specified distances is: 50 feet 100 feet 200 feet 400 feet Dump Truck 86 80 74 68 Bulldozer 80 74 68 62 Worst case noise impact on the park will occur when the construction equipment is filling the park property. From a technical perspective the Maple Valley Highway noise level is insignificant relative to the noise level of equipment constructing the fill. Consequently, the noise level shown in the chart above can be considered the worst case noise level. Following completion of the fill, the Park Department might choose to reconstruct the existing berm as a visual/noise barrier of the batch plant site. Occasionally, and intermittently, equipment will move through the fill area, following completion of the fill. As previously stated, it is intended that the use of the newly filled area continue to be a staging area for equipment and material. Dust - Material placed in the fill area will contain some water. Material placed with a water content too low to prevent dust will be watered during 2 Phone conversation with Bruce Farar, Washington State Department of _ Transportation, April 8, 1987. %Cbo 0 Hugh G.Goldsmith &Associates,Inc. Renton Building & Zoning Department Attn-: Mr. Donald Erickson 23 April 1987 Page Four placement and compaction to minimize the creation of airborne dust par- ticles. Prevailing winds are typically from the west (S.W. or N.W.) and normally will help keep spurious dust from settling in the park. Glare - All the operations will occur during the day and no lights will be used during the filling operation. Therefore, the project will not create glare. 7. The erosion problem - the erosion issue was covered in item 2 above. 8. Possible impacts on the City's well system - The Well Field Pro- tection ' Study prepared for the City of Renton in August, 1984 by CH2MHILL addressed several issues related to the Stoneway Batch Plant. None of the issues considered filling a portion of the site. However, the report did indicate that "The water table within the aquifer is generally at or near the elevation of the water surface in the Cedar River." By filling the site about ten feet the applicant would be more than doubling the amount of cover currently provided over the aquifer in the proposed fill area. When the filling operation is completed the finished surface will be hard and relatively impervious to infiltration and percolation. The highly compacted fill will also act as a barrier to horizontal mitagation of pol- lutants from upstream of the fill site. The fill will also keep polluted flood water separated from the water table to a greater degree than pro- vided now. Since the proposed use of the fill area is continuation of the exist- ing use, the overall affect of placing the fill is seen to be a positive one relative to protection of the City's water supply. 9. .. .that the fill would not affect the floodway channel - Cedar River data used to generate the new FEMA maps was obtained from CH2MHILL. A new cross-section was added to the existing data at the location of the proposed fill. The AEC 2 program was then run to obtain new flood information based on the proposed fill. A report of the flood plain analysis is attached for your review. The attachments include a map showing the location of the cross-section, a print of a portion of the new draft FEMA map by CH2MHILL showing the study cross section location, computer print outs showing the before fill and after fill flood plain elevations, and a written report describing the analysis procedure. The conclusion reached in the study is that the fill will not affect the elevation of the 100 year flood plain. qQrk_O Hugh G.Goldsmith ) &Associates,Inc. • Renton Building & Zoning Department Attn: Mr. Donald Erickson 23 April 1987 Page Five 10. Information on haul routes - Since no sources of fill material have yet been identified it is not possible to describe haul routes to the proposed fill site. At best, it can be stated that the material will originate at locations within the economic haul distance from the propsed- project site. Material generated outside the economic haul distance will be taken to other approved fill sites. Potential material sources are ex- pected to be within a radius of 8 to 10 miles from the fill project. Generally, dump trucks use major highways and freeways to transport their loads. Use of local access streets is usually limited to that needed for access to the source of the material. 11. Number of trips per day - It is anticipated that there will be an average of four to five trucks per hour arriving at the site during the work day. It is possible that as many as seven trucks per hour will arrive at the site during peak times. 12. Hours of peak impact - The nature of the anticipated sources of material (i.e., utility construction projects and foundation excavations) dictate that the truck traffic will be relatively uniform during the con- struction workday, roughly 7 AM to 4 PM. The applicant requested the permit be issued for 7 AM to 8 PM Monday through Saturday to provide the flexibility to work overtime if necessary during the summer construction season. Work would be suspended during evening hours if it conflicted with scheduled evening activities at the Cedar River Park. If additional information is needed to enable the City to complete processing of the grade and fill application, please contact me. Very truly yours, HUGH G. GOLDSMITH & ASSOCIATES, INC. Richard D. Padrick, P.E. RDP:sar Enclosures cc: Don Merlino 0 Hugh G.Goldsmith &Associates,Inc. • , n,• DS/Dsc2 \ „Aj y1 1 • 1;11� �q\4�1 CITY OF DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (j•�J® (MITIGATED) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO.: ECF-005-87 APPLICATION NO(S) .: SP-005-87, SM-002-87 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for special permit to allow the filling and grading on 3.88 acres of property with approximately 53,000 cubic yards of material in order to bring the property to grade with the remainder of the site, and substantial shorelines development permit to allow said fill and grading within 200 feet of Cedar River. PROPONENT: Stoneway Concrete and City of Renton Parks and Recreation Department LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Directly north of Cedar River at 1915 • Maple Valley Highway. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2) (c) . This decision was made after review of an expanded environmental checklist and preliminary site plan, on file with the lead agency. Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-2822(D) Renton Municipal Code (see attached sheet) . These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340. The lead agency will not act on this proposal for fifteen (15) days from June 25, 1987. Any , interested party may submit written comments which must be submitted by 5:00 p.m., July 10th in order to be considered. ''This Determination may be appealed by 5:00 p.m. on July 10th. Any • appeal must be submitted in writting stating clearly reasons for revising the Determination and must be accompanied by a non-refundable $75.00 filing fee. , Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 235-2500 DATE OF DECISION:• June 10, 1987 EFFECTIVE DATE: June 26, 1987 %• 0/ ,Ronald G. Nelson L 'Building and Zoning Director Policy ve ment Director Richard F Houghton Public W rks Director S yMM CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE MITIGATION MEASURES ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO.: ECF-005-87 APPLICATION NO(S).: SP-005-8. , SM-002-87 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for special permit to allow the filling and grading on 3.88 acres of property with approximately 53,000 cubic yards of material in order to bring the property to grade with the remainder of the site, and substantial shorelines development permit to allow said fill and grading within 200 feet of Cedar River. PROPONENT: Stoneway Concrete and City of Renton Parks and Recreation Department LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 3 _ CONDITIONS: 1. Haul routes and hours of operation to be approved by Public Works, Policy Development, Parks and Recreation, and the State Department of Transportation. 2. All fill materials to be certified as to their cleanliness by a certified professional engineer. 3. Hours of filling are to be coordinated with the Parks and Recreation Department. �r / 4. The north river bank is to be rip- (74. ) rapped to the 100-year flood plain -) elevation. L (5 A fifteen (15) foot maintenance/ / 1 - C2'Jr7r� .do access easement parallel to the / c g9 /0 edar River is to be granted to th C City which could function as an eventual link between the Cedar 4 I e/ River Park and residential areas to the east. (6. !Additional conifers and evergreen shrubbery should be added to buffer the adjacent Cedar River Park. DS/Dskl EC5^^587 CITY OF RE.. 4 DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE • (MITIGATED) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO.: ECF-005-8-7-- ------ ., ' APPLICATION'NO(S).: SP-005-87, SM-002-87 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for special permit to allow..the filling and grading on 3.88 acres of property with approximately 53,000 cubic yards of material in order to bring the property. to grade with the remainder of the site, and substantial shorelines development permit to allow said fill and grading within 200 feet of Cedar River. PROPONENT: Stoneway Concrete and City of Renton . Parks and Recreation Department LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Directly' north of Cedar River at 1915 Maple Valley Highway. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department . The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required ' under RCW 43.21C.030(2) (c) . This decision was made after review of an expanded environmental checklist and preliminary site plan, on file with, the lead agency. Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures . by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-2822(D) Renton Municipal Code (see attached sheet) . These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified • during the environmental review process. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340. The lead agency will not act on this proposal for fifteen (15) days from August 3, 1987. Any. interested party may submit written comments which must be submitted by 5:00 p.m., August 17, 1987, in order to be considered. This Determination may be appealed by 5:00 p.m. on August 17, 1987. Any appeal must be submitted in writting stating clearly reasons 'for revising the Determination and must be accompanied by a non-refundable $75.00 filing fee. . Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee . City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 235-2500 . DATE OF DECISION: July 29, 1987 • EFFECTIVE DATE: ' August 3, 1987 11 2e W �. Ro a �•�� 1 ld G. Nelson W' r . Spr.i ger Building and Zoning Director Poli. Deve q.ment Director '1.- 2/ , • ' RiCSard C./ oug Public Wo s Director 1.-- ppenjv ! DS aStonwyMM CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE MITIGATION MEASURES ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO.: ECF-005-87 APPLICATION NO(S) .: SP-005-87, SM-002-87 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for special permit to allow the filling and grading on 3.88 acres of property with approximately 53,000 cubic yards of material in order to bring the property to grade with the remainder of the site, and substantial shorelines development permit to allow said fill and grading within 200 feet of Cedar River. PROPONENT: Stoneway Concrete and City of Renton Parks and Recreation Department LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: CONDITIONS: i. Haul routes and hours of operation to be approved by Public Works, Policy Development, Parks and Recreation, and the State Department of Transportation. 2. All fill materials to be certified as to their cleanliness by a certified professional engineer. 3: Hours of filling are to be coordinated with the Parks and Recreation Department. 4.)A landscape/erosion buffer easement having a minimum width of 30 feet from the mean water level of the Cedar River and a northern setback distance determined by the drip line of existing trees along the river's edge and running the full width of the western portion of the site from the western boundary (abutting Cedar River Park) east to the existing sedimentation pond is to be provided to visually screen the industrial uses on the site from recreational uses along the Cedar River as well as to create an erosion buffer from Cedar River J flooding; 5. Because of the fragile natural environment of the landscape buffer, fill materials shall be retained by earthern, berms beginning behind the landscape buffer; NOTE: If ecology blocks are used as a retention device for the proposed fill, they shall. be bermed along their river side and shall be setback a minimum distance of 15 Determination of Non-,ignificance Mi t i,"stion Measures Pa 2 feet from the landscaped buffer easement identified in item 4. ' above. 6. �A11 bermed areas shall be landscaped with evergreen trees and plants as well as soil retained evergreen ground cover; and 7: Additional conifer and evergreen shrubbery shall be planted in the j landscape/erosion buffer easement for erosion control as well as to create an aesthetic visual screen of heavy industrial uses on the site. , 6- 3-87 Th sited States LAW WEEK 55 LW 5145 - • beach portion of the Nollans' property from the rest of the No.86-133 • lot. The historic mean high tide line determines the lot's • oceanside boundary. DAMES PATRICK NOLLAN, ET ux., APPELLANT a. The Nollans originally leased their property with an option ' CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION • to buy. The building on the lot was a small bungalow, total- _ ing 504 square feet, which for a time they rented to summer - ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT•OF.APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, yacationers. After years of rental use; however, the:build- SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT _ . ing had fallen into disrepair, and-could no longer be rented 1 Syllabus out. • - The Nollans' option to purchase was conditioned_on their No.86=133. Argued March 30, 1987—Decided June 26, 1987 promise to demolish the bungalow and replace it. In order The California Coastal Commission granted a permit to appellants to re- to do so. under California Public.Resources Code §§30106, • place a small bungalow on their beachfront lot with a larger house upon 30212, and 30600(West 1986),they were re uired to obtain a the condition that they allow the public an easement to pass across their q • beach,which was located between two public beaches. The County Su- coastal development permit from the California Coastal Com • - erior Court granted appellants a writ of administrative mandamus and ) mission. On February 25, 1982, they submitted a permit directed that the permit condition be struck. However,the State Courr application to the Commission in which they proposed to de- of Appeal reversed,ruling that imposition of the condition did not violate molish the existing structure and replace it with a three-bed- the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment,as incorporated against the room house in keeping with the rest of the neighborhood. States by the Fourteenth Amendment. The Nollans were informed that their application had been Held: placed on the administrative calendar, and that the Commis- 1. Although the outright taking of an uncompensated. permanent, sion staff had recommended that the permit be granted sub- public-access easement would violate the Takings Clause, conditioning appellants'rebuilding permit on their granting such an easement would ject to the condition that they allow the public an easement to be lawful land-use regulation if it substantially furthered governmental Pass across a portion of their property bounded by the mean purposes that would justify denial of the permit. The government's high tide line on one side, and their seawall on the other side. • power to forbid particular land uses in order to advance some legitimate This would.make it easier for the public to get to Faria ' police-power purpose includes the power to condition such use upon County Park and the Cove. The Nollans rotested im osi- some concession by the owner,even a concession of property rights,so P p ti ob- long as the condition furthers the same governmental purpose advanced on of the condition, but the Commission overruled their as justification for prohibiting the use. jections and granted the permit subject to their recordation 2. Here the Commission's imposition of the access-easement condition Of deed restriction granting the easement. App. 31, 34.` cannot be treated as an exercise of land-use regulation power since the •In June 3, 1982, the Nollans filed a petition for writ of ad- condition does not serve public purposes related to the permit require- ,itinistrative mandamus asking the Ventura CountySuperior ment. Of those put forth to justify it—protecting the public's ability t P see the beach,assisting the public in overcoming a perceived"psycholo - Court to invalidate the access condition. They argued that ical"barrier to using the beach,and preventing beach congestion—n ne the condition could not be imposed absent evidence that their is plausible. Moreover, the Commission's justification for the acc ss proposed development would have a direct adverse impact on requirement unrelated to land-use regulation—that it is part of a c - public access to the beach. The c ee and remanded prehensive program to provide beach access arising from prior coas al full e i permit decisions—is simply an expression of the belief that the public i _ the case to the Commission for a full evidentiary hem ing n rarest will be served by a continuous strip of publicly accessible beat t e. ., at Although the State is free to advance its"comprehensive program"b3 On remand, the Commission held a public hearing, after exercising its eminent domain power and paying for access easements,it which it made further factual findings-and reaffirmed its im- cannot compel coastal residents alone to contribute to the realization of that goal. position of the condition. It found that the new house would 1TT Cal.App.3d 719,223 Cal. Rptr.28,reversed. increase blockage of the view of the ocean, thus contributing to the development of"a'wall'of residential structures"that SCALIA,J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which REHNQLTIST, would prevent the public"psychologically. . . from realizing • C.J., and WHITE, PowELL, and O'CONNOR,JJ.,joined. BRENNAN,J., a stretch of coastline exists nearby that they have every right • filed a dissenting opinion,in which MARSHALL,J.,joined. BLACRMUN,J., to visit." Id.,at 58. The new house would also increase ri- filed a dissenting opinion. STEVENS, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in p which BLACKMUN,J.,joined. vate use of the shorefront. Id., at 59. These effects of con- struction of the house, along with other area development, I JUSTICE SCALIA delivered the opinion of the Court. would cumulatively"burden the public's ability to traverse to James and Marilyn Nollan appeal from a decision of the and along the shorefront." Id., at 65-66. Therefore the California Court of Appeal ruling that the California Coastal Commission could properly require the Nollans to offset that Commission could condition its grant of permission to rebuild burden by providing additional lateral access to the public their house on their transfer to the public of an easement beaches in the form of an easement across their property. across their beachfront property. 177 Cal. App. 3d 719, 223 The Commission also noted that it had similarly conditioned Cal. Rptr. 28 (1986). The California Court rejected their 43 out of 60 coastal development permits along the same tract claim that imposition of that condition violates the Takings of land,and that of the 17 not so conditioned, 14 had been ap- Clause of the Fifth Amendment, as incorporated against the proved when the Commission did not have administrative States by the Fourteenth Amendment. Ibid. We noted regulations in place allowing imposition of the condition, and probable jurisdiction. 479 U. S. =(1986). the remaining 3 had not involved shorefront property. Id., . Ii at 47-48. • The Nollans filed a supplemental petition for a writ of ad-The Nollans own a beachfront lot.in Ventura County, Cali- ministrative mandamus with the Superior Court, -in which . l forma. A quarter-mile north of their property is Faria ,they argued that imposition of the access 'condition.violated County Park, an oceanside public park with a public beach the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment,as incorporated . 'and recreation area. Another public beach area, known lo- against the States by the Fourteenth Amendment. The Su-- cally as-"the Cove,"lies 1,800 feet south of their lot. A-con- :perior Court ruled in their favor on statutory grounds; find- • xjni . crete seawall appro tely eight feet high separates the 'ing, in 'part to avoid'"issues•of constitutionality," that the- . - pwpc, \X . , �/ ,„ • The United States LAW WEEK 6-23-87 ,'5S. Ls; 5146 1 uses Of the eminent domain nnwp�;c tn_a_ceutr that the California Coastal Act of authorized th 1976, Cal.Commission Res. to .i Code Ann. them ublic spa of alltheir___ordinary meaning. Indeed;one of the.prjn- §30000 et seq.,n autho ernment be able to require conveyance of just sue}iinter- with a new one ests, so.lon . J.'Sackman, 1 Nichols on - access.conditions on coastal development permits for the re-- god' placement of an existing single-family.home minent Domain §2.1[1](Rev. 3d ed. 1985), 2 id., §:5.01[5]; only where the proposed development would have an adverse see 1 , §1.42[9], 2 id., §6.14. Perhaps because the point ublic access to the se . p ..419.'In the Court's impact on pa Ap is so obvious, we have never been confronted with a contro- i view, versy.that.required us to rule upon it,but our cases'-analysis- factual basis for concludin that of the effect of other governmental action leads to the same , wit the house w ul create a direct or cumulative b Ord non conclusion. We have r_epeatedly_lield that as-to.groperty re-_ public access to the sea._ Id.. at416=417. Accordingly;the strved by its owner for private. use. "the rghtt-o exclude \. Superior Court granted the writ of mandamus and directed (others is] 'one of al sticks in the bnndle_of,_ that the permit condition be struck. rights that are commonly ch racterized-as-propertj'_L% The Commission appealed to the California Court of Ap Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp., 458 U. S. peal. While that appeal was pending,'the Nollans satisfied 419, 433 (1982), quoting Kaiser Aetna v. United States, 44II,' the condition on their option to purchase by tearing down the U. S. 164, 176 (1979). In Loretto we observed that where bungalow and building the new house, and bought the prop governmental action results in"[a]permanent physical occu- erty. They did not notify the Commission that they were pation"of the property, by the government itself or by oth- taking that action. ers, see 458 U. S., at 432-433, n. 9, "our cases uniformly The Court of Appeal reversed the Superior Court. 177 haye found a•taking to the extent of the neeupation, without Cal.App.3d 719,223 Cal. Rptr.28(1986). It disagreed with regard to whether the a • , the Superior Court's interpretation of the Coastal Act; find- ne t or as only minimal economic impact on the o erg ing that it required that a coastal permit for the construction id.,at 34_435. We think a"permanent h sisal occu anion' of a new house whose floor area, height or bulk was more has occurred, purposes of that rule,where individuals are than 10% larger than that of the house it was replacing be given en an con inuous rig o pass o d fro,so conditioned on a grant of access. Id., at 723-724, 223 Cal. th , even ' Rptr., at 31;see Cal. Pub. Res. Code §30212. It also ruled thong no particular individual is permitted to station himself r that that requirement did not violate the Constitution under permanent I the reasoning of an earlier case of the Court of Appeal,Grupe 1 USTICE BRENNAN argues that while this might ordinarily v. California Coastal Comm'n, 166 Cal. App. 3d 148, 212 be the case, the California Constitution's prohibition on any Cal. Rptr.578(1985). In that case,the court had found that individual's "exclu[ding] the right of way to [any navigable] so long as a-project contributed to the need for public access, water whenever it is required for any public purpose,"Arti- even if the project standing alone had not created the need cle X,§4,produces a different result here. Post,at 6-7;see e for access,and even if there ^^i: ip also post, at 14, 16-17. There are a number of difficulties been the access exacted and the need to which the project with that argument. Most obviously, the right of way contributed, imposition of an access condition on a develop- sought here is not naturally described as one to navigable _mentpetm_it was cnffi-gently related_tn burdens created by . water(from the street to the sea) but along it; it is at least the project to be_constitutional. 177 Cal. App. 3d, at 723, highly questionable whether the text of the California Con- 223 Cal. Rptr., at 30-31;see Grupe,supra, 166 Cal. App., at stitution has any prima facie application to the situation be- 165-168, 212 Cal. Rptr., at 587-590; see also Remmenga v. fore us. Even if it does, however, several California cases California Coastal Comm'n, 163 Cal. App. 3d 623, 628, 209 suggest that JUSTICE BRENNAN's interpretation of the effect Cal. Rptr. 628, 631 (1985), appeal dismissed, 474 U. S. 915 of the clause is erroneous,and that to obtain easements of ac- (1985). The Court of Appeal ruled that the record estab- cess across private property the State must proceed through fished that that was the situation with respect to the Nollans' its eminent domain power. See Bolsa Land Co. v. Burdick, house. 177 Cal. App. 3d, at 722-723, 223 Cal. Rptr., at 151 Cal.254,260,90 P. 532,534-535(1907);Oakland v.Oak- 30-31. It ruled that the Nollans'taking claim also failed be- land Water Front Co., 118 Cal. 160, 185, 50 P. 277, 286 •cause, although the condition diminished the value of the (1897);'Heist v. County of Colusa, 163 Cal. App.3d 841,851, Nollans' lot, it did not deprive them of all reasonable use of 213.Cal: Rptr. 278, 285 (1984); Aptos Seascape Corp. v. their property. Id.,at 723,223 Cal.Rptr.,at 30;see Grupe, Santa Cruz, 138 Cal. App. 3d 484, 505-506, 188 Cal. Rptr. supra, 166 Cal. App. 3d, at 175-176, 212 Cal. Rptr., at 191, 204-205 (1982) (None of these cases specifically ad- 595-596. Since,in the Court of Appeal's view,there was no dressed the argument that Article X,§4 allowed the public to statutory or constitutional obstacle to imposition of the access cross private property to get to navigable water,but if that • condition, the Superior Court erred in granting the writ of provision meant what JUSTICE BRENNAN believes, it is hard mandamus. The Nollans appealed to this Court,raising only to see why it was not invoked.) See also 41 Op. C i Atty.t the constitutional question. Gen. 39, 41 (1963) ("In spite of the sweeping p ', [Article X, §4], and the injunction therein to the Legislature I II : to give its provisions the most liberal interpretation,the few Had.California simply required the Nollans to make an reported cases in California have adopted the general rule easement across their beachfront available to the public on a that one may not trespass on private land to get to navigable permanent basis in order to increase public access to the _ . • ! beach, rather than conditioning their permit to rebuild their ,The'holding of PruneYand Shopping Ct?+k' v Rolrins, 447 U.S.74 • 'house on their agreeing to do so, we have no doubt there (19I'l not inrnnsistent with this analysis, there 447 U.S. 74 would have been a taking.. To say that the appropriation of a, • ready openediso his propertytent to the is analgenera is,since and e addition theion permanent. i public easement across a landowner's premises.does not con- Y was not required. The analysis of Kaiser Aetna v.United States, i stitute the taking of a property interest but rather, (as Jus- 444 U.S.419(1979),is not inconsistent because it was affected by trade i! TICE BRENNAN contends) "a mere restriction on its use," tional doctrines regarding navigational servitudes. t Of w�neither easement.of i post, at 8, n. 3, is to use words in a manner that.deprives those cases involved,as this one does,a classic right-of-way I r L.I. ;` • _ 4 -.. 1 . •t.' • 6-23-87 The• .United States LAB' WEEK 55 LW 5147 tidewaters for the purpose of commerce,-navigation or-fish- broad range of governmental purposes:and,regulations satis- .• . . ' ing"). In light of these-uncertainties, and-given'the fact- fies these requirements.. ,See Agins_v: Tiburon, supra, at - 0that, as JUSTICE BLACKMUN notes, the Court of Appeal did 260-262-(scenic zoning);Penn Central Transportation Co:-v.. - - not rest its decision on Article X, §4, post, at 1, we should' New York City; supra (landmark preservation); Euclid v. _ - • ' - assuredly not take it upon ourselves to resolve this question Ambler Realty Co.,272 U. S.365(1926)(residential zoning): i of California constitutional law in the first instance. See, Laitos and Westfall, Government Interference with Private . e. g., Jenkins v. Anderson, 447 U. S. 231, 234, n. :1 (1980). Interests in Public Resources, 11.Harv. Envtl. L. Rev: 1, 66 That would be doubly inappropriate since the Commission did -(1987). The Commission argues that among these permissi- not advance this argument in the Court of Appeal, and the bled purposes are protecting the public's ability to see the Nollans argued in the Superior'Court that any claim that beach, assisting the public in overcoming the "psychological there was a pre-existing public right of access had to be as- barrier" to using the beach created by a developed shore- serted through a quiet title action,see Points and Authorities front, and preventing congestion on the public beaches. We in Support of Motion for Writ of Administrative Mandamus, assume, without deciding, that this is so—in which case No.SP50805(Super. Ct. Cal.), p. 20, which the Commission, the Commission unquestionably would be able to deny the possessing no claim to the easement itself, probably would Nollans their permit outright if their new house(alone, or by ' not have had standing under California law to bring. See reason of the cumulative impact produced in conjunction with Cal. Code Civ. Proc. Ann. §738(West 1980).2 other construction)' would substantially impede these pur- Given, then, that re u" • poses, unless the denial would interfere so drastically with ou right would violate the FnnrtPP , yg4c1- the Nollans' use of their property as to'constitute a taking. men , e q s ion comes whether requiring it to be con- See Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York City. v_eyed as a con " • upra. - outcome. We have long recognized that land use regulation The Commission argues that a permit condition that serves I does not effect a taking if it "substantially advance[s] legiti- the same legitimate police-power purpose as a refusal to issue I mate state interests"and does not"den[y]an owner economi- the permit should not be found to be a taking if t - • . cally viable use of his land,"Agins v. Tiburon,447 U. S. 255, issue the permit would not constitute a taking. We agree. 260 (1980). See also Penn Central Transportation Co. v Thus, emission attar the permit eons-condi- 1 ew York City, 438 U. S. 104, 127(1978) ("a use restrictio Lion t at would ha VP nrote ra,l r) „ tic's ability to see the j may constitute a`taking' if not reasonably necessary to th- beach notwithstanding construction of the n•w ,. • . effectuation of"a substantial government purpose"). Ou, - . y 1T 11 „• . '.. . width restriction, or a ban on cases have not elaborated on the standards for determinin. f,nces—so long as the Commission could have exerrispd its what constitutes a "legitimate state interest" or what typ:• police power(as we have assumed it could)to forbid construe- of connection between the-regulation and the state interes tion of the house altogether, imposition of the condition satisfies the requirement that the former "substantially as would also be constitutional. Moreover(and here we come vance" the latter.' They have made clear, however, that : closer to the facts of the present case), the condition would be constitutional even_if_it rnnsisted of the rem i the`ollans provide a viewing spot on their property for paac- 'JL'STICE BRENNAN also suggests that the Commission's public a - ersby with whose sighting of the ocean their new house houncement of its intention to condition the rebuilding of houses on th-- transfer of easements of access caused the Nollans to have"no reasonable would interfere Altho . - _ • •• .nstituting claim to any expectation of being able to'exclude members of the public" a pe •-. -• grant of continuous access to the propert from walking across their beach. Post,at 17-19. He cites our opinion in would have to be considered a taking if it were not attached Ruckelshaus v.Monsanto Co.,467 U.S.986(1984)as support for the pe- to a development permit, the Commission's assumed power culiar proposition that a unilateral claim of entitlement by the government to forbid construction of the house in order to protect the can alter property rights. In Monsanto,however,we found merely that 1 the takings clause was not violated by giving effect to the Government's public's view of the beach must surely include the power to announcement that application for"the right to[the]valuable Government condition construction upon some concession by the owner. benefit,"id., at 1007(emphasis added),of obtaining registration of an in- even a concession of property rights, that serves the same secticide would confer upon the Government a license to use and disclose end. If a prohibition designed to accomplish that purpose the trade secrets contained in the application. Id., at 1007-1008. See also Bowen v. Gilliard,— U. S. —,—(1987). But the right to build on one's own property—even though its exercise can be subjected to - legitimate permitting requirements—cannot remotely be described as a Britt Lighting, Inc. v.Missouri,342 U. S.421,423(1952), in support of "governmental benefit." And thus the announcement that the application the standards he would adopt. But there is no reason to believe(and the for(or granting of)the permit will entail the yielding of a property interest language of our cases gives some reason to disbelieve)that so long as the j cannot be regarded as establishing the voluntary"exchange,"467 U.S.,at regulation of property is at issue the standards for takings challenges,due ! 1007,that we found to have occurred in Monsanto. Nor are the Nollans' process challenges,and equal protection challenges are identical:any more rights altered because they acquired the land well after the Commission than there is any reason to believe that so long as the regulation of speech had begun to implement its policy. So long as the Commission could not is at issue the standards for due process challenges,equal protection chal- . ' have deprived the prior owners of the easement without compensating lenges, and First Amendment challenges are identical. Goldblatt v. them,the prior owners must be understood to have transferred their full Hempstead,369 U.S.590(1962),aces appear to assume that the inquiries property rights in conveying the lot. : ' - are the same,but that assumption is inconsistent with the formulations of 'Contrary to JUSTICE BRENNAN's claim,post,at—,our opinions do our later races. not establish that these standards are the same as those applied to due -'If the Nollans were being singled out to bear the-burden of California's - process or equal-protection claims. -To the contrary,our verbal'formula; attempt to remedy these problems,although they had not contributed to it , tions in the takings field have generally been quite different. We have re- more than other coastal landowners,the State's action,even if otherwise quired that the regulation"substantially advance"the"legitimate state in- valid, might:violate either the incorporated Takings Clause or the Equal • terest"sought to be achieved,Agins v.Tiburon,447 U.S.255,260(1980), . Protection Clause. One of the principal purposes of the Takings Clause is not that"the State'could rationally have decided'the measure adopted "to bar Government from forcing some people alone to bear public burdens might achieve the State's objective." Post,it—,quoting Minnesota_v. which,in all fairness and justice,should be borne by the public as a whole." Clover Leaf Creamery Co:,449 U.S.456,466(1981). JUSTICE BRENNAN Armstrmw v_ flni/ed Stato-v_3f4 I1_S d0 dal flQrfll•ape alcn San.nieoo ,.., .._..,. ' . • • .55 LW 5148 The'l iiited States LAW WEEK 6-23-87 • ' would be a legitimate exercise of the police power rather than Rewriting the argument to:eliminate the play on wois, a taking, it would be strange to conclude that providing the makes clear that there is nothing to it. si _ owner.,an alternative to that prohibition which accomplishes to understand how a requirement that people-alrea_dy_onl ! th__gg-The purpose is not. - - u� bblic beaches be able to walk across the Nollans' grope ,I'he'evident constitutional propriety disappears, however, reduces any obstacles to viewing the beach_created by_ - if the condition substituted for the'prohibition utterlyfails to -•new house. It is also impossible to understand how it low f further the end advanced as the!justification for the prohi- any "psychological barrier" to using the public beaches, bition. When that essential nexus is eliminated, the situa-` how it helps to remedy any additional congestion on th tion becomes the same as if California law.forbade shouting caused by construction of the Nollans' new house.'--fire in.a crowded theater, but granted dispensation s to thosewilling to contribute$100 to the state treasury. Whilea b as an exercise of its land on shouting fire can be a core exercise of the State's poli er or any of these purposes.'. Our conclusion on t power to protect the public safety, and can thus meet even point is consistent with the approach taken by every other our stringent standards for regulation of speech, adding the court that has considered the question, with the exception of unrelated condition alters the purpose to one which, while it the California state courts.' See Parks v. Watson, 716 F. 2d I may be legitimate, is inadequate to sustain the ban. There- 646, 651-653 (CA9 1983); Bethlehem Evangelical Lutheran fore, even though, in a sense, requiring a$100 tax contribu- Church v. Lakewood, 626 P. 2d 668, 671-674 (Colo. 1981); i tion in order to shout fire is a lesser restriction on speech Aunt Hack Ridge Estates, Inc. v. Planning Comm'n, 160 than an outright ban,it would not pass constitutional muster. Conn. 109, 117-120, 273.A. 2d 880, 885(1970);Longboat Key Similarly here, the lack of nexus between the condition and v.Lands End,Ltd., 433 So. 2d 574(Fla.App. 1983);Pioneer the original purpose of the building restriction converts that Trust&Saving Bank v. Mount Prospect', 22 Ill. 2d 375, 380; purpose to something other than what it was. The purpose 176 N. E. 2d 799, 802(1961);Lampton v, Pinaire, 610 S. W. then becomes, quite simply, the obtaining of an easement to 2d 915, 918-919 (Ky. App. 1980); Schwing v. Baton Rouge, serve some valid governmental-purpose, but without pay- 249 So. 2d 304 (La. App.), application denied, 259 La. 770, ment of compensation. Whatever may be the outer limits of 252 So. 2d 667(1971);Howard County v. JJM,Inc., 301 Md. "legitimate state interests" in the takings and land use con- 256, 280-282, 482 A. 2d 908, 920-921 (1984); Collis v. Bloo- text, this is not one of them. In short, unless the permit mington, 310 Minn. 5, 246 N. W. 2d 19 (1976); State ex rel. condition serves the same governmental purpose as the Noland v. St. Louis County, 478 S. W. 2d 363 (Mo. 1972); development ban, the building restriction is not a valid regu- Billings Properties, Inc. v. Yellowstone County, 144 Mont. lation of land use but "an out-and-out plan of extortion." 25, 33-36, 394 P. 2d 182, 187-188 (1964); Simpson v. North J. E. D. Associates, Inc. v. Atkinson, 121 N. H. 581, 584, Platte, 206 Neb. 240, 292 N. W. 2d 297 (1980); Briar West, 432 A. 2d 12, 14-15 (1981); see Brief for United States as Inc v. Lincoln, 206 Neb. 172, 291 N. W. 2d 730 (1980); Amicus Curiae 22, and n. 20. See also Loretto v. Tele- may- prompter Manhattan CATV 58 U. at 439, n. 17.5 J. E. D.Associates v.Atkinson, supra;Longridge Builders, ; Corp , arp: S., y . Inc. v.Planning Bd.of Princeton,52 N. J.348,350-351,245 III A.2d 336, 337-338(1968);Jenad,Inc. v. Scarsdale, 18 N. Y. 2d 78, 218 N. E. 2d 673.(1966); In re MacKall v. White, 85 The Commission claims that it concedes as much, and that App. Div. 696, 445 N. Y. S. 2d 486 (1981), appeal denied, 56 we may sustain the condition at issue here by finding that it N. Y.2d 503,435 N. E. 2d 1100(1982);Frank Ansuini,Inc. is reasonably related to the public need or burden that the •v Cranston, 107 R. I. 63, 68-69, 71, 264 A. 2d 910, 913, 914 Nollans' new house creates or to which it contributes. We (1970); College Station v. Turtle Rock Corp., 680 S. W. 2d can accept, for purposes of discussion, the Commission's pro- 802, 807 (Tex. 1984); Call v. West Jordan, 614 P. 2d 1257, posed test as to how close a "fit" between the condition and 1258-1259 (Utah 1980);Board of Supervisors of James City the burden is required, because we find that this case does County v. Rowe, 216 Va. 128, 136-139, 216 S. E. 2d 199,not meet even the most untailored standards. The Commis 207-209(1975);Jordan v.Menomonee Falls, 28 Wis. 2d 608, - •n's principal contention to the contrary essentially turns on 617-618, 137 N. W.2d 442,447-449(1965),appeal dismissed, a play on the word "a•ccess." The Nollans' new house, the U. S. 4 (1966). See also Littlefield v. Afton, 785 F. 2d interfere with ` • ccess" to the 96, 607 (CA8 1986); Brief for National Association of Home 1 n J w;ll •n e era with the desj of people who drive past Builders et al. as Amici Curiae 9-16. the Nollans'house to use the beach,,thus creating a"psycho- I.•'cal barrier" .. ". -_ " " • 1 o t- -new house win o,by a process not altogether clear from the Commission's .As JUSTICE BRENNAN notes,the Commission also argued that the con- opinion but presumably potent enough to more than offset struction of the new house would"'increase private use immediately adja- the effects of the psychological barrier, increase the use of cent to public tidelands,'"which'in turn:might result in more disputes be- the public beaches, thus creating the need for more"access." twteen the Nollans and the public as to the location of the boundary. Post, at 9,quoting App.62_ That risk of boundary disputes,however,is inher- These burdens on"access"would be alleviated by a require- ent in the right to exclude others from one's property,and the construction ment that the Nollans provide"lateral.access"to the beach- here can no more justify mandatory dedication of a sort of"buffer zone"in ' order to avoid boundary disputes than can the construction of an addition to a single-family house near a public street. Moreover,a buffer zone has .a boundary as well, and unless that zone is a"no-man's land"that is off- _'One would.expect that a regime in which this kind of leveraging of the limits for both.neighbors(which is of course not the case'here)its creation police power is allowed would produce stringent land-use regulation which achieves nothing except to shift the location of the boundary dispute fur- the State then waives to accomplish other purposes,leading to lesser real- ther onto the private owner's land. It is true that in the distinctive situa- ization of the land-use goals purportedly sought to be served than would- tion of the Nollans'property the sea-wall could be established as a clear result from more lenient (but nontradeable) development restrictions. demarcation of the public easement. But since not all'of the lands to which Thus,the importance of the purpose underlying the prohibition not only this land-use condition applies have such a convenient reference point,the does not justify the imposition of unrelated conditions for eliminating the avoidance of boundary disputes is,even more obviously than the others,a • --•+—'...-- .Yarz.' .vc:' .7_.."- v" • _..A 2 a_-. ... . . - -.•S• .._ _--_'_,__v......I .. .. i.. d. , - I 6-23-87 The United States LAW WEEK r.) SS LW 5149 JUSTICE BRENNAN argues that imposition of the access re- finds this an illegitimate exercise of the police power.because • - quirement-is not irrational. In his.version of the Commis- -it.rriaintains that there is no reasonable relationship between 0 sion's argument, the reason for the requirement is that in its the effect of the development and the condition imposed. absence, a person looking toward the beach from the road The first problem=with this conclusion is that the Court im- - - . will see a street•of residential structures including the poses a standard of precision_for the exercise of a State's - , Nollans'new home and conclude that there is no public beach 'police power that has been discredited for the better part : nearby. If, however,that person sees people passing and of this century. Furthermore, even under the Court's i repassing along the dry sand behind the Nollans' home, he cramped standard,the permit condition imposed in this case will realize that there is a public beach somewhere in the vi- directly responds to the specific type of burden on access cre- cinity. ated by appellants'development. Finally, a review of those Post, at 8-9. The Commission's action, however, was based on the opposite factual finding that the wall of factors deemed most significant in takings analysis makes houses completely blocked the view of the beach and that a clear that the Commission's action implicates none of the con- person looking from the road would not be able to see it at all. cerns underlying the Takings Clause. The Court has thus App. 57-59. struck down the Commission's reasonable effort to respond to I intensified development along the California coast, on behalf Even if the Commission had made the finding that JUSTICE of landowners who can make no claim that their reasonable BRENNAN proposes, however, it is not certain that it would expectations have been disrupted. The Court has, in short, ' suffice. We do not share JUSTICE BRENNAN'S confidence given appellants a windfall at the expense of the public. that te future hinutilizing its ex.e .'littldifficulty in the I . ; e ween provisions f _ The Court's conclusion that the permit condition imposed . 1 1.1 . c , , , tat will avoid the effect of today's deci- on appellants is unreasonable cannot'withstand analysis. sion. We view the Fifth Amendment's property clause to be First, the Court demands a degree of exactitude that is in- ;,i more_than a pleading requirement, and compliance with it to consistent with our standard for reviewing the rationality be more than an exercise in cleverness and imagination. As of a state's exercise of its police power for the welfare of i ...dicated earlier, our cases describe the condi 'of for its citizens. , Second, even if the nature of the public access abrid•em• . aye•- ri• s t ou.h the .. - - a•wer as a condition imposed must be identical to the precise burden "substantial advanc[ing]"of a legitimate State interest. We on access created by appellants, this requirement is plainly are incline o partrcu ar care ' five satisfied. where a ac conveyance of property ismade a con ition A I ; o a mg o an use restriction, since in that context There can be no dispute that'the police power of the States there is ie e nee rrsTc t iat e purpose is avoidance of the encompasses the authority to impose conditions on private , er .an the stated police- development. See, e. g., Agins v. Tiburon, 447 U. S. 255 (1980); Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York We are left, then, with the Commission's justification for City, 438 U. S. 104 (1978); Gorieb v. Fox, 274 U. S. 603 the access requirement unrelated to land use regulation: (1927). It is also by now commonplace that this Court's "Finally, the Commission notes that there are several review of the rationality of a State's exercise of its police existing provisions of pass and repass lateral access power demands only that the State "could rationally have benefits already given by past Faria Beach Tract appli- decided"that the measure adopted might achieve the State's cants as a result of prior coastal permit decisions. The objective. Minnesota v. Clover Leaf Creamery Co., 449 access required as a condition of this permit is part of a U. S. 456, 466 (1981) (emphasis in original).' In this case, comprehensive program to provide continuous public ac- cess along Faria Beach as the lots undergo development also Williamson v.Lee Optical Co.,348 U. S.483,487-488(1955) or redevelopment." App. 68. ("[TJhe law need not be in every respect logically consistent with its aims That is simply an expression o the Cnmmiesinn's belief that to be constitutional. It is enough that there is an evil at hand for correc- tion,e nutillc interest will od idea, by a-that u iisstr-esta.lisp tion,and that it might be thought that the particular legislative measure liely accessible beach along the coast. The Commission may was a rational way to correct it");Day-Brite.Lighting, Inc. v.Missouri, 342 U. S.421,423(1952)("Our recent decisions make it plain that we do well be righ tliat4t-is a good ie]ea,but-that does not-establish not sit as a super-legislature to weigh the wisdom of legislation nor to'de- that the Nollans (anti.other coastal residents) alone can be tide whether the policy which it expresses offends the public welfare.. . . compelled to contribute to its realization. �{atlier o a [S]tate legislatures have constitutional authority to experiment with new is free to advance its"conprehensive_pro-gram,"_if it wishes, 'ni ose;'-seeSorL4t-,-imdtTY but'lf it wants-arr- police they are entitled to their own standard of the public welfare"). by using its power of eminent domain for this "public pur- - Nothwithstanding the suggestion otherwise, ante, at —, n.3, our standard for reviewing the threshold question whether an exercise of the p •must-pay-for_it..__-_ police power is legitimate is a uniform one. As we stated over 25 years ago in addressing a takings challenge to government regulation: Reversed. "The term'police power'connotes the time-tested conceptional limit of public encroachment upon private interests. Except for the substitution of the familiar standard'of'reasonableness,'this Court has generally re JUSTICE BRENNAN,with whom'JUSTICE MARSHALL joins, framed from announcing any specific criteria. The classic statement of the •- dissenting. rule in Lawton v.Steele,;152 U.S.133,137(1894),is still valid today:'. . . II]t must appear,first,that the interests of the public...require[govern- .Appellants in this case sought to construct a new dwelling ment]intereference;and,-second,that the means are reasonably necessary on their beach lot that Would both diminish visual access to for the accomplishment of the purpose,and not unduly oppressive upon in- - - the beach and move private development closer to the public dividuals.'- Even this rule is not applied with strict precision, for this tidelands. The Commission reasonably concluded that such -Court has often said that'debatable questions as to reasonableness are not "buildout," both -individually and cumulatively, threatens- for the courts but for the • legislature... 'E.g.,Sproles v.Binford,286 U.S.374,388(1932). Goldblatt v.Hempstead 369 369 U.S. 590,594-595 public access to the shore. It sought to offset this,encroach- ment byobtainingassurance that the ublic ma walk alonga). it t -- _ P Y ,,, See See also,id.,at 596(upholding regulation from takings challenge with vita- its �`,LAW OFFICES / � CASEY, PRUZAN & KOVARIK MERWIN E. CASEY 18TH FLOOR PACIFIC BUILDING CARL PRUZAN SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104 JOHN F. KOVARIK MARTIN A. GODSIL OF COUNSEL (206) 623-3577 • WILLIAM J. MORRIS PHILLIP T. HUTCHISON RICHARD A. ACARREGUI DAVID G. SHENTON W. DIRKER EHLERT GARY R. ENGLISH CITY 7 OF RENTON PROVIDENCE WORLEY EI ,,�IE�MICHAEL A. CARBON �JANE RYAN KOLERAu ust 25 198771(12: 11g BUILDING / ZONING DEPT. Ron Nelson, Director CERTIFIED/RETURN RECEIPT Building and Zoning City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Stoneway Concrete v. City of Renton Dear Mr. Nelson: This letter is to confirm that the appeal period in the referenced matter has been extended to Friday, August 28, 1987. Very truly yours, CASEY, PRUZAN & KOVARIK Jane Ryan Koler cc: Don Merlino Gary Merlino JRK/dmb COI M.) CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director August 20, 1987 Jane Ryan Koler Casey, Pruzan & Kovarik 18th Floor, Pacific Building Seattle, WA 98104 RE: Request for reconsideration of Condition 6. of the Environmental Review Board's July 29, 1987, Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated, ECF-005-87, SP-005-87 The Environmental Review Committee reconsidered Condition 5. pursuant to your request yesterday and reiterated its previous position that because of the fragile natural environment of the existing and proposed landscape buffer, fill materials shall be retained by earthen berms which should be landscaped with evergreen trees and plants as well as soil retaining ground cover. The Committee referred to the June 8, 1987, letter from the State of Washington Department of Fisheries in which they stated: "The toe of the proposed fill should encroach no closer than 50 feet from the high waster mark of the river. The existing woodlands should remain unaltered. The existing fill should be pulled back to this 50 foot minimum line. The face of the fill slope should be at a 2: 1 slope and heavily vegetated to native species such as willow, cottonwood, red-twig dogwood, wild rose, and ninebark. This will provide stability to the fill slope, and provide better wildlife use than rockery. " The Committee continues to believe that with the City's proposed Cedar River trail system being extended along the south side of the river east of 1-405 it will be important to visually screen, to the greatest extent possible, those uses and features which have a potentially-negative visual impact on the immediate surroundings. It was also the Committee's belief that a natural looking environment should be achieved east of I-405, to the greatest extent possible. Staff noted that the City's Shoreline Master Program (Section 7. 07. 01) notes that industrial development should "place inland all facilities which are not water dependent;" and should be "designed in such manner as to enhance the scenic view;" The Committee therefore unanimously upheld its former decision to require that all fill areas not only be bermed but also landscaped with soil retaining plant materials. • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 Jane Ryan Koler Casey, Pruzan & Kovarik August 20, 1987 Page 2 Incidentally, in your August 17, 1987, written appeal statement you are mistaken about the facts regarding this application. On page 2 of your August 17, 1987, letter you incorrectly state that the City did not issue a threshold determination until July 1, 1987. The City's Environmental Review Committee considered Stoneway's proposed grade and fill application and environmental checklist, as well as the supplemental information requested on March 12, 1987, and supplied to us in letter form on April 23, 1987, at their regular meeting on May 13, 1987, and issued a Determination of Non- Significance_ - Mitigated (see letter of May •21, 1987, from me to Richard D. Padrick, P.E. ) . It was not until July 6, 1987, that this determination was appealed by your firm on behalf of Stoneway Concrete. Since the Committee upheld its environmental determination of July 29, 1987, which was in response to your earlier request for reconsideration on July 6, 1987, in which they changed conditions 4. , 5. , and 6. , and added a seventh, the Committee has asked me to inform you that they would extend the appeal period which closed on August 17, 1987, one week until 5:00 p.m. on August 24, 1987. If you decide to appeal, there is a $75. 00 fee which should be filed with the City Clerk's Office. If you have any questions, please feel free to give me or my staff a call., 401 Dona • K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator OF i �, o PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT �� ® DESIGN/UTILITY ENGINEERING • 235-2631 rn MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 9,0 co. 09g1O BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR MEMORANDUM DATE: August 19, 1987 TO: Richard C. Houghton, Public Works Director Donald K. Erickson, Zoning Administrator Environmental Review Committee FROM: Robert E. Bergstrom, Engineering Supervisor SUBJECT: STONE'JAY FILL and SHORELINE PERMITS I note in the August 19, 1987 E.R.C. agenda, considerable discussion and correspondence on the E.R.C. conditions imposed on the developer. The Public Works issues revolve around flood control, and I would like to reinforce these issues: 1. The Department of Public Works has requested maintenance access along the river bank to allow for maintenance dredging of the river. 2. The river bank up to the 100-year flood level shall be rip-rap, to be resistant to river flood flow velocities that are estimated at or above 8 feet per second. 3. A computer model of the river flow at 100-year flood using the U.S, . Army Corps of Engineers HEC Program be performed for the proposed bank fill. An early computer model was developed and I have seen the data output. However, I now note that the bank design is different. A new computer model run may be required. Also, my office must be provided with a complete data input file on standard floppy computer disks to confirm independently the computer output. Thank you. 1D.6.09.REB:mf ("L2951 AI L DISPATCH, INC. (800)562-1091 kk[[ f' Jtrrtr•u jr�r, 1 V 0. 336468 CO((Pier (III" aeta tien [OPry P.O. BOX 12616 SEATTLE,WA 9811 A )ATE q PIECES WEIGH DESCRIPTION ,s,-; t t l �� Co 'DELIVERY CHARGES I ;HG.TOIHIPPER ( Y P�l.��al ti ii .�G INSURANCE STREET ADDRESS fir. CITY r STATE DRIVER SIGNATURE TIME PIECES&WEIGHT :HG.if,. CONSIGNEE �I� :-'':( /// //J�1r r Cily O d�iC,J4,1 L.-i 1C/` F'6/00I Ot°, ) TOTAL DUE C E t �f r STREET CITY/1 I a STAT REMARKS N. id DRIVE{? S GNATURE DATE z 'TIME Pd c� !Y c Jfj SHIPPER DECLARES THE RELEASED ALUE OF THE SHIPMENT TO,A f 1��� 1l' IS DECLARED ONBTHIS RECIEPTNLESS A GREATER VALUE 2 COURIER /M. ❑MAIL ❑SP CIAL ❑EXCLUSIVE ❑OTHER CONSIGNEE LAW OFFICES CASEY, PRUZAN & KOVARIK MERWIN E. CASEY 18TH FLOOR PACIFIC BUILDING CARL PRUZAN SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104 JOHN F. KOVARIK OF COUNSEL PHILLIP T. HUTCHISON MARTIN A. GODSIL (206) 623-3577 WILLIAM J. MORRIS RICHARD A. ACARREGUI DAVID G. SHENTON W. DIRKER EHLERT GARY R. ENGLISH PROVIDENCE WORLEY MICHAEL A. LARSON JANE RYAN KOLER August 19, 1987 I I " 20 i: .7 1J Jerry Lind `.. Planning Department City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 - Re: Motion for Reconsideration of Mitigating Condition 5 Dear Jerry: I am sending along a revised motion for reconsideration. I have deleted all references to condition 6 because the Merlinos - do not wish to appeal that condition. It probably would eliminate any confusion if you were to distribute the revised version of the motion to the Environmental Review Committee. Thank you. Very truly yours, CASEY, PRUZAN & KOVARIK Ja a Ryan Koler Enclosure JRK/dmb • i. :ric130 MUNOZ/MO-MO •f .^ . . • _ .....4.-2'7. 't'2 16 /,.\ (( i ‘1.-j•:'. 1 0 g rjj 1.i h- . atitz I DIT1 '.'' i ( Sn 4 ,.,/i--) ,-,JI) L.. 4 (,-\ 1 , _ t , n 4 - :', ' ''' . r. . -., ..,, NOINFIH !O -inal d,/,p&_la oh ./12(7 r7-2L9/4-t16V ai . Qy C„,0, yruffiDgC- 1/7.12,idp( 3 ar7-od\A _ fv-vic9 yv-9 0:90-5106:2 4 ,a Tr . ul 1 K7j Arap ri,,c, c)p 9:.,7- -7)--g ( kb 7Cvrvi 6 ii cm/2 - 7+ .( IP,;_-22J-wpi 5U/Iv d i .../- Go q. (1_--o6 0 ,1 n e/crlE C -7( _. _,(1,/_ . • r) ( 4(21 aPew, r-D--07Y0-d a I 9:7ff WgletV1) (3 ' 1,0-79:0 f al c(0 9t,i 1-2I pol otilv (-0-70 L.so 06/ ("I‘127I-P°_,prO -613 /5(An a.) 7 --zreve.iiwv z)i "15,irr, liz.2 -?2 /.723-1(g_t FY)L11-- ttalo,, ( ..Fia)1 offoe --(570\ . ) 0(// cv,, i pwv pkAo 5-. • 96/ (-0 y/ em o 0 4 r?e f'4 ai rrprIca.-.P. 605P0A0p I SiAll' i ---,- 67)ifipd -D-70 • 1,0-___Q2/2rd 0/ S liC2 di -72t-/ V/2-):-9.--3d SvIYr )(. . eftr -a) 0) Mt/ 1 e--)Gil '34-0V(All0 , I ' (-If la(t-Orr) C2g/C06) riltddi,G11,11Pi1C1 ,-40eV , ° ' Z/ . s g-2 tp-swo wi, 7 ,.90 L,o_i,)(,//trbin ( 2,42-jud-6 ( 1% 1 _/fcriv i...zio-7,s--?nuda 1 v c fy poor) c,u2_,F 401-7:po ,, rid/ryoii -2(??99-,a(ci, pludiu u1Q,1 /)cp-j . ‘ . . J I ��4 E i LAW OFFICES CASEY, PRUZAN & KOVARIK MERWIN E. CASEY 18TH FLOOR PACIFIC BUILDING CARL PRUZAN SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104 JOHN F. KOVARIK OF COUNSEL PHILLIP T. HUTCHISON MARTIN A. GODSIL (206) 623-3577 WILLIAM J. MORRIS HUTCHISON RICHARD A. ACARREGUI DAVID G. SHENTON W. DIRKER EHLERT GARY R. ENGLISH PROVIDENCE WORLEY MICHAEL A. LARSON JANE RYAN KOLER August 19, 1987 C. . e _/-M._.•, a n.... 17 ),'\, rr;Tf �'_.I I ,`� 1 1 1 1 a,� ya ,�.�92p s� `<< �� �, Environmental Review Committee City of Renton l2.). I^� r , '•, .,•, r,,^ ^ 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Motion for Reconsideration of Mitigating Condition 5 Dear Environment Review Committee: We represent Stoneway Concrete ("Stoneway") . Stoneway requests that the Environmental Review Committee reconsider condition 5 which was imposed on this development proposal upon issuance of a Revised Mitigated Declaration of Nonsignificance issued on August 3, 1987, by the City of Renton. Stoneway appeals condition 5 because this condition (1) was not imposed in compliance with the requirements governing the imposition of mitigating conditions which are articulated in WAC 197-11-660 and (2) constitutes an unconstitutional taking of Stoneway's property in violation of the taking clause of the Fifth Amendment, as incorporated against the states by the Fourteenth Amendment and the Ninth Amendment of the Washington State Constitution. Stoneway also appeals imposition of this condition because the City of Renton did not timely issue an initial threshold environmental determination and, thus, was without authority to impose this mitigation measure. I. FACTS Our client operates a concrete batch plant located at 1915 Maple Valley Highway in Renton, Washington. The site is presently zoned for heavy industrial use. Cedar River Park is located west of the batch plant site, and the Cedar River runs along the southern boundary of the site. Stoneway filed an application for a grade and fill permit on January 27, 1987. On that date, Stoneway also submitted an environmental checklist to the City of Renton. Stoneway applied for a grading and fill permit in order to fill 3 .88 acres of its Environmental Review Committee City of Renton August 19, 1987 -- Page 2 13 acre site to bring that area of the batch plant site to the same elevation as the remainder of the site. Creating a more even site will allow Stoneway to make more effective use of the site and correct some drainage problems at the site. In connection with this filling project, Stoneway will also finish installing a concrete block wall around the site. A concrete block wall already encloses some portions of the site (see Appendix A) . However, in order to completely enclose the site, Stoneway wishes to extend existing portions of the concrete block retaining wall. It is necessary to enclose the site for security purposes; small children who utilize Cedar River Park, which is located west of the site, frequently wander over to the batch plant site. This circumstance creates a dangerous situation which must be eliminated. Because a portion of the fill and fence is to be placed within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark, Stoneway also filed an application for a substantial development permit. Although the Renton Environmental Ordinance requires that the City issue a threshold determination within fifteen days of the submission of an environmental checklist, in the present case, a threshold determination was not timely issued within fifteen days of the date that the environmental checklist was submitted to the City (January 27, 1987) . Instead, on March 12, 1987, the City requested more information from the applicant about this project (Appendix B) . Stoneway provided this information to the City on April 23, 1987 (Appendix C) . Although Stoneway provided additional information to the City on April 23, 1987, the City did not issue a threshold determination within twenty days of that date. The City did not issue a threshold determination until July 1, 1987; on that date, the City issued a Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance ("MDN") (see Appendix D) . None of the mitigation measures set forth in the MDN was imposed in order to remedy probable adverse aesthetic impacts on (1) the view from the edge of the river on the Stoneway property and (2) the view from trails located across the river from the Stoneway property. Stoneway requested that the Environmental Review Committee reconsider mitigation conditions 4, 5 and 6, which were set forth in the July 1, 1987, MDN. Those conditions read as follows: 4. The north river bank is to be rip-rapped to the 100-year flood plain elevation. Environmental Review Committee City of Renton August 19, 1987 -- Page 3 5. A fifteen (15) foot maintenance/access easement parallel to the Cedar River is to be granted to the City which could function as an eventual link between the Cedar River Park and residential areas to the east. 6. Additional conifers and evergreen shrubbery should be added to buffer the adjacent Cedar River Park. Upon reconsideration, the Environmental Review Committee eliminated the above recited conditions and imposed the following mitigation measures: 4. A landscape/erosion buffer easement having a minimum width of 30 feet from the mean water level of the Cedar River and a northern setback distance determined by the drip line of existing trees along the river's edge and running the full width of the western portion of the site from the western boundary (abutting Cedar River Park) east to the existing sedimentation pond is to be provided to visually screen the industrial uses on the site from recreational uses along the Cedar River as well as to create an erosion buffer from Cedar River flooding; 5. Because of the fragile natural enviornment of the landscape buffer, fill materials shall be retained by earthern berms beginning behind the landscape buffer; NOTE: If ecology blocks are used as a retention device for the proposed fill, they shall be bermed along their river side and shall be setback a minimum distance of 15 feet from the landscaped buffer easement identified in item 4 above. 6. All bermed areas shall be landscaped with evergreen trees and plants as well as soil retained evergreen ground cover; and 7. Additional conifer and evergreen shrubbery shall be planted in the landscape/erosion buffer easement for erosion control as well as to create an aesthetic visual screen of heavy industrial uses on the site. S-. Environmental Review Committee City of Renton August 19, 1987 -- Page 4 The MDN issued on August 3, 1987, specified that the conditions 4, 6 and 7, which are recited above, were imposed to (1) prevent soil erosion from occurring and (2) serve as a vegetative screen which would serve to screen off the industrial uses on the site for aesthetic purposes (see Appendix E) . However, the Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance did not specify what adverse environmental impact condition 5 was imposed in order to mitigate. The City of Renton's Environmental Official, Donald Erickson, stated in a telephone conversation on August 13, 1987, that condition 5 was imposed in order to prevent the concrete block retaining wall from adversely impacting on views (1) from the edge of the river and (2) from City trails across the river. The environmental document for this project (e.g. ', the environmental checklist) 1/ did not identify probable adverse impacts on river views. The environmental checklist and comments from various City departments about the development proposal only focus on one adverse aesthetic impact of the project. These documents state that the filling and fencing proposal will have an adverse visual impact on the view from the park and Maple Valley Highway. However, the relevant environmental document (e.g. , the environmental checklist) does not express any concern about adverse impacts on the view from the edge of the river and from trails across the river from the site. Presumably, no concern about such aesthetic impacts was expressed in the environmental document for the project because the edge of the river adjacent to the site is located on Stoneway property. Because the edge of the river near the site is private property, which is owned by the applicant, the City was probably unconcerned about the view from that vantage point. J Richard Settle, a noted commentator on environmental law states: "SEPA conditions , are only allowed to mitigate specific adverse environmental impacts clearly identified in an environmental document,, that is, a checklist, or other threshold determination document, or an EIS." R. Settle, The Washington State Environmental Policy Act; A Legal and Policy Analysis, §18 (1987) . Environmental Review Committee City of Renton August 19, 1987 -- Page 5 II. CONDITION 5 DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE IMPOSITION OF MITIGATION CONDITIONS WHICH ARE ARTICULATED IN WAC 197-11-660 A. Condition 5 violates WAC 197-11-660 (a) and (b) . WAC 197-11-660, which implements the terms of RCW 43 .21C.060, sets forth various restrictions on the City's authority to mitigate development proposals. WAC 197-11-660 states in relevant part: (a) Mitigation measures or denials shall be based on policies, plans, rules, or regulations formally designated by the agency (or appropriate legislative body, in the case of local government) as a basis for the exercise of substantive authority and in effect when the DNS or DEIS is issued. (b) Mitigation measures shall be related to specific, adverse environmental impacts clearly identified in an environmental document on the proposal and shall be stated in writing by the decision maker. The decision maker shall cite the agency SEPA policy that is the basis of any condition or denial under this chapter (for proposals of applicants) . After its decision, each agency shall make available to the public a document that states the decision. The document shall state the mitigation measures, if any, that will be implemented as a part of the decision, including any monitoring of environmental impacts. Such a document may be the license itself, or may be combined with other agency documents, or may reference relevant portions of environmental documents. (c) Mitigation measures shall be reasonable and capable of being accomplished. (d) Responsibility for implementing mitigation measures may be imposed upon an applicant only to the extent attributable to the identified adverse impacts of its proposal. Voluntary additional mitigation may occur. In the present situation, the City did not follow the above described requirements in formulating various mitigation measures for this project. First, the City failed to specify the identified environmental policies on which condition 5 is based. Environmental Review Committee City of Renton August 19, 1987 -- Page 6 Second, the City did not state what. adverse environmental impact the above recited condition was devised in order to correct as required by WAC 197-11-660 (b) . WAC 197-11-660 (b) clearly states that mitigation measures must be related to specific adverse environmental impacts clearly identified in an environmental document on the proposal. In this case, the relevant environmental document (e.g. , the environmental checklist) did not specify any adverse environmental impacts which pertained to this mitigation measure. (Environmental Official Donald Erickson indicates that this measure was imposed to prevent the retaining wall proposed for the southern boundary of the property from impairing views from the river. ) The environmental checklist only discussed the probable adverse visual impact of this development proposal on the view from Cedar River Park and the Maple Valley Highway. The environmental checklist stated: 10. What views in the immediate vicinity will be altered or obstructed? Stored concrete products may be more visible from the adjacent park and Maple Valley Highway. 11. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts if any. A six-foot fence with ivy on the west property line will significantly mitigate any view impact. A six-foot fence with ivy and four to five feet Douglas firs, at fifteen feet centers, along the north property line will mitigate any view impact from the north. In this case, the environmental document did not discuss the visual impact of the this project on views from the edge of the Cedar River and from City trails located across the river from the site. Thus, mitigation measure 5 is not related to specific, adverse environmental impacts clearly identified in an environmental document on the proposal. Environmental Review Committee City of Renton August 19, 1987 -- Page 7 B. Condition 5 violates WAC 197-11-660(d) , which specifies that mitigation measures may be imposed only to the extent necessary in order to mitigate adverse environmental impacts. Condition 5 was improperly imposed because imposition of this condition is not necessary in order to mitigate any adverse environmental impacts associated with this filling and fencing proposal. Although Renton's Environmental Official, Donald Erickson, indicated that this condition was imposed for the purpose of screening off the concrete retaining wall which Stoneway proposes to install near the southern boundary of its property, it is unnecessary to impose this condition in order to accomplish that objective. The thirty-foot landscape easement (required by mitigating condition 4 of the revised Determination of Non-Significance) , which will be located in front of the concrete retaining wall, will serve to screen off the wall from the edge of the river. Hence, condition 5 is unnecessary to mitigate an adverse environmental impact associated with this project. C. Condition 5 constitutes an unconstitutional taking of Stoneway's property. Because there is no connection between the imposition of condition 5 and the mitigation of adverse environmental impacts, condition 5 constitutes an unconstitutional taking of Stoneway's property, which violates the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution, which is made applicable to the states by the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution. The condition also violates the Ninth Amendment of the Washington State Constitution (Article I, Section 16) , which prohibits the government from taking private property without just compensation. Recently, the United States Supreme Court considered when the imposition of • a development condition constitutes a compensable taking. Nollan v. California Coastal Commission, 55 L.W. 5145 (June 26, 1987) , held that a condition imposed upon granting a building permit was improper and constituted a taking of the Nollans' property. In that case, the Nollans applied for a building permit in order to construct a house on their beachfront lot. The California Coastal Commission approved the issuance of a building permit to the Nollans on the condition that they grant the public an easement to pass across their beach, which was located between two public beaches. Environmental Review Committee City of Renton August 19, 1987 -- Page 8 The California Coastal Commission stated that the condition was imposed to (1) protect the public's ability to see the beach, (2) assist the public in overcoming a perceived psychological barrier to use of the beach, and (3) prevent beach congestion. The California Coastal Commission also justified the imposition of this condition on the basis that the access easement was imposed as part of the comprehensive state program to provide beach access to members of the general public. The United States Supreme Court held that none of the above reasons was legitimately connected to the building permit condition which required the provision of a public access easement. The Supreme Court also observed that furthering the state goal of providing public access to the beach was improper justification for the imposition of the access easement requirement: Although the state is free to advance its comprehensive program by exercising its eminant domain power and paying for access easements, it cannot compel coastal residents alone to contribute to the realization of that goal. 55 L.W. at 5147. The court concluded that there must be a tight connection between the ends advanced as justification for a development condition and the condition which is imposed. Accordingly, the court held that requiring the Nollans to donate an access easement constituted a permanent taking of the Nollans property because the grant of the shoreline access easement effectively involved a permanent occupation of the Nollans property for a government purpose. The court observed that development conditions are invalid when there is not a specific connection between the government purpose served and the condition imposed: The evident constitutional propriety disappears, however, if the condition substituted for the prohibition utterly fails to further the end advanced as the justification for the prohibition. When that essential nexus is eliminated, the situation becomes the same as if California law forbade shouting fire in a crowded theater, but granted dispensations to those willing to contribute $100 to the state treasury. While a ban on shouting fire can be a core exercise of the State's police power to protect the public safety, and can thus meet even our stringent standards for Environmental Review Committee City of Renton August 19, 1987 -- Page 9 regulation of speech, adding the unrelated condition alters the purpose to one which, while it may be legitimate, is inadequate to sustain the ban. Therefore, even though, in a sense, requiring a $100 tax contribution in order to shout fire is a lesser restriction on speech than an outright ban, it would not pass constitutional muster. Similarly here, the lack of nexus between the condition and the original purpose of the building restriction converts that purpose to something other than what it was. The purpose then becomes, quite simply, the obtaining of an easement to serve some valid governmental purpose, but without payment of compensation. Whatever may be the outer limits of "legitimate state interests" in the takings and land use context, this is not one of them. In short, unless the permit condition serves the same governmental purpose as the development ban, the building restriction is not a valid regulation of land use but "an out-and-out plan of extortion.". . . 55 L.W. at 5148. The analysis of Nollan v. California Coastal Commission indicates that condition 5 constitutes an unconstitutional taking of Stoneway's property. Here, the City of Renton has asked Stoneway to set aside a 15' x 430' area on its property for a landscaped berm. The imposition of this condition does not further a valid governmental objective. The purpose of the landscaped berm is to screen off the retaining wall, proposed to be constructed along the southern boundary of the property from the area of the river. It is unnecessary to impose condition 5 in order to accomplish the objective of screening off the retaining wall from the area of the river because the thirty-foot landscaped easement area located in front of the retaining wall (condition 4) will serve the same purpose. Thus, there is no specific connection between the imposition of condition 5 and the realization of a valid governmental objective. This condition is not specifically connected to the grant of a grading and fill permit. Condition 5, which requires Stoneway to permanently reserve a 15' x 430' area of its property for landscaping and berming purposes, constitutes an impermissible taking of Stoneway's property. The property which the City is requiring Stoneway to set aside exclusively for landscaping and berming is prime industrial property which sells for $10 per square foot. The effect of condition 5 is to deprive Stoneway of the right to utilize a 6,450 square foot area of its property which has a Environmental Review Committee City of Renton August 19, 1987 -- Page 10 fair market value of $64,500. Condition 5 effectively constitutes a permanent occupation of a 6,450 square foot area of the Stoneway property for a governmental purpose; such a requirement is a compensible taking within the meaning of Nollan v. California Coastal Commission, supra. D. Condition 5 runs afoul of WAC 197-11-660(c) because condition 5 is unreasonable. WAC 197-11-660(c) states that "mitigation measures shall be reasonable and capable of being accomplished. " Condition 5 is unreasonable because this condition is redundant and does not serve to directly mitigate any adverse environmental impacts (see Section B) . Condition 5 is also unreasonable because compliance with this condition would impose an undue hardship on Stoneway: Condition 5 will require Stoneway to move its pumphouse. The pumphouse is located on the western portion of the property. In order to prevent either (1) children from playing in the pumphouse and possibly sustaining injuries or (2) the pumphouse from being vandalized, it is necessary for the pumphouse to be located within the confines of the wall which will be erected around the property. If Stoneway is constrained to comply with condition 5, in addition to complying with condition 4 which requires the provision of a thirty-foot landscaped easement, then it will be necessary for Stoneway to relocate its pumphouse. However, were Stoneway only required to comply with condition 4, it would be unnecessary to move the pumphouse. In order to move the pumphouse, Stoneway would be compelled to incur enormous expense. Because condition 5 serves to mitigate no adverse environmental impact, is redundant, and financially burdensome, this condition is an unreasonable mitigating measure. III. BECAUSE THE CITY DID NOT TIMELY CONDUCT ENVORNMENT REVIEW, THE CITY WAS WITHOUT AUTHORITY TO IMPOSE MITIGATION MEASURES ON THIS DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL. The Renton Environmental Ordinance at Section 4.2808 (B) clearly provides that the City must issue its initial threshold determination within either (1) fifteen days of the submission of the environmental checklist or (2) twenty days after the applicant has provided additional information about a particular proposal upon request of the City. Section 4.2808 (B) states: (B) Threshold Determinations: 1. Threshold determinations not requiring further information from the applicant or Environmental Review Committee City of Renton August 19, 1987 -- Page 11 consultation with agencies with jurisdiction should be completed within fifteen (15) days of submission of an adequate application and the completed check list. 2. Threshold determinations requiring further information from the applicant or consultation with other agencies with jurisdiction should be completed within twenty (20) days of receiving the requested information from the applicant or the consulted agency; requests by the City for such further information should be made within twenty (20) days of the submission of an adequate application and completed check list; when a request for further information is submitted to a consulted agency, the City shall wait a maximum of thirty (30) days for the consulted agency to respond. Here, the City did not timely issue its initial threshold determination. After Stoneway submitted an environmental checklist on January 27, 1987, the City requested additional information from the applicant on March 12, 1987. After receiving the additional information on April 23, 1987, the City waited until July 1, 1987, to issue its initial threshold determination. Instead, the City ought to have issued this determination within twenty days of April 23, the date on which the applicant provided the City with the additional information as requested. A City is without inherent authority. A City only has authority which is specifically delegated to it by statute and regulation. F. Schnidman, Handling the Land Use Case, §2 .22 (1983) . Here, under the City's Environmental Ordinance, the City has the authority only to issue a threshold determination either within fifteen days of the date that the enviornmental checklist was submitted or within twenty days of the date that the applicant provided additional environmental information. Because the City did not timely issue its initial threshold determination in accord with the requirements set forth in the Renton Environmental Ordinance, the City was without authority to impose mitigating measures on the present development proposal. Accordingly, when the City of Renton imposed mitigation measures on the present development proposal in its July 1, 1987, Determination of Non-Significance and its August 3, 1987, Determination of Non-Significance, these actions were ultra vires; the City was without authority to impose 111 S Environmental Review Committee City of Renton August 19, 1987 -- Page 12 mitigation measures because the City did not do so in accord with the relevant municipal requirements. IV. CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, we respectfully request that the City retract mitigation measure no. 5. Very truly yours, CASEY, PRUZAN &. KOVARIK J ne Ryan Koler Attachments cc: Stoneway Concrete JRK/dmb OF RED ', 0 �. .•. o BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT ','.. 4,.. . ' RONALD G. NELSON = DIRECTOR Z ..IL '';' o_ 09 k� MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055: •. 235-2540 0 Q9 E �gr� � - - OSEPt ''i BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH = 7 ` • MAYOR - _ _ , r', �;, Lr \\ ei uP o. Ram, . , , .. , -.. 0 '11 FM k ilji 13 0 Uri nd 1E t n 0 March 12, 1987 'I., . .• ' 13UftDIN G/ZOfIING DEPT, Mr. Richard Padrick 501 Lyon Building Seattle, WA 98104 RE: Stoneway Special Permit for Grade and Fill of 53,000 cu.yd.s at 1915 Maple Valley Highway Dear Mr. Padrick: The Environmental Review Committee considered your application yesterday at its • regular meeting and passed a motion to defer your application pending the submittal of additional information from you regarding: future plans for the site; measures being taken to control erosion, especially during flooding of the Cedar River; source and type of fill materials; traffic impacts on Maple Valley Highway; measures that will be taken to keep debris and dirt off City streets; potential adverse impacts on the City's nearby well system as well as its aquifer; and potential adverse impacts (noise, dust, glare) on the City's adjacent Cedar River Park. At the meeting, Public Works staff noted that a geotechnical engineer should be consulted to review the erosion problem as well as possible impacts on the City's well system. They also indicated that the flood capacity review was not complete enough for them to certify that the fill would not affect the floodway channel. They indicated that "cross sections and hydraulic modeling using HEC-2 programs" should also be done. Information on haul routes. number of trips per day and hours of peak impact should also be provided. As soon as this new information is available, we will be able to proceed with your application. You may wish to talk with Bob Bergstrom in Public Works regarding the erosion problem. If you have any questions, please give me a call at 235-2540. S• c . J f(L. :.____, onald K. Eri son, AICP . Zoning Administrator - . 3555Z - - r `V \Y IS 3.‘C) Hugn G.Goldsmith INV & Associates, Inc. #86121 23 April 1987 Renton Building & Zoning Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Attention: Mr. Donald K. Erickson, AICP Re: Stoneway Special Permit for Grade and Fill of 53,000 cu. yds. at 1915 Maple Valley Highway and Renton letter response dated March 12, 1987 Dear Mr. Erickson, Following is our response to your comments on our referenced special permit. We will address each issue in the order presented in your March 12, 1987 letter. 1. Future plans for the site - Some consideration has been given to the potential use of the site in a very general way. That consideration has been limited to discussions of the possibility of a hotel and small retail use. No effort has been made to evaluate what uses are allowed un- der the code or if there is a market for a hotel/retail use. - The fill is being placed to improve the utility of the batch plant site. Future use of the site will be identified some time in the future. 2. Measures being taken to control erosion - The drawings submitted with the special permit application require construction of a filter fabric fence at the ordinary high water mark on the south side of the fill site, parallel to the Cedar River, prior to beginning work. A berm will be con- structed landward of the filter fence to further contain silt laden storm water on site. As material is placed it will be sloped to to a desiltation pond on the north side of the berm. The settling pond will discharge to the Cedar River. These measures will minimize discharge of silt laden storm water runoff to the river. 3. Especially during flooding of the Cedar River - The landscape plan presented on the application drawings was prepared to conform to our under- standing of Park Department and Public Works Department requirements. If the bank needs additional protection from Cedar River flood waters, we will armor the berm in a manner similar to the bank along the Park-Cedar River interface, or with other protection satisfactory to all City of Renton Departments. The river mean velocity in the area of the proposed project, 501 Lyon Building / Seattle Washington 98104/ (206)622-1080 consulting engineers • surveyors • planners Q 0-e \X C✓ Renton Building &. Zoning Department Attn: Mr. Donald Erickson 23 April 1987 Page Two during the 1.00 year storm, is about 8 fps. The velocity along the bank will be less than 8 fps. Well maintained bermuda grass on the slope will ensure a stable slope during normal flooding. 4. Source and type of fill materials - Source of the material is indeterminate at this time. Material to be used for fill will be primarily excess earth from utility construction jobs in Seattle, Renton, Kent, and King County. Some earth may also come from foundation excavation work for new buildings. The majority of earth in the region is of the Alderwood and Everett types. Alderwood soils compose about 45% of all soils in King County. Everett soils compose another 8% of all soils in King County. Both soils are of the gravelly sandy loam type. The remaining 47% of soils is com- posed of 35 other types, mostly silt loam material. It is likely that some clay silt loam type soils will be placed in the fill. If necessary the applicant will keep records on the origin of all material placed in the fill. 5. Traffic impacts on Maple Valley Highway - The average daily traf- fic on the Maple Valley Highway at the batch plant site is about 26,600 vehicles, based on an actual Washington State Department of Transportation traffic count in 1985 of 25,065 vehicles.1 Of that total about 520 are heavy trucks, i.e. trucks hauling gravel, concrete, and solid waste. We estimate that there will be an average of 35 trucks per day arriv- ing at the site to dump material in the fill area. Peak traffic is esti- mated to be 50 trucks per day. Peak daily truck traffic arriving at the fill site amounts to 0.38% of the total average daily one way traffic on the Maple Valley Highway. Generally, total traffic volume impacts of 3 percent or less are not noticeable to most drivers. The proposed new temporary truck traffic is about 6% of the existing heavy truck traffic. • 6. Measures that will be taken to keep debris and dirt off City streets - Stoneway trucks have added side boards to their trucks to help keep material in the truck. All trucks have mud flaps which are cleaned regularly. All loads are within legal limits. Some of the trucks arriving at the fill site will be owned by private dirt movers and will not be under the strict control of the applicant. If necessary, trucks will dump their material at the edge of the fill area to minimize the opportunity to track dirt out to the Maple Valley Highway. Trucks leaving the fill area must cross several hundred feet of con- crete pavement before they enter SR169. Any dirt on the vehicle wheels 1 Phone conversation with Dave 0berg, Washington State Department of Transportation, April 6, 1987. %Cb0 Hugh G.Goldsmith &Associates,Inc. • Renton Building & Zoning Department Attn: Mr. Donald Erickson 23 April 1987 Page Three should be cleaned off before the trucks reach SR169. As a mater of routine the concrete hardstands on the batch plant site are kept clean. It may be possible to give a specification sheet to all non-Stoneway truck drivers outlining minimum requirements to haul through the City of Renton and into the Stoneway site. 6. Potential adverse impacts (noise, dust, glare) on the City's ad- jacent Cedar River Park: Noise - Noise studies done in the vicinity of the Cedar River Park/Stoneway Batch Plant by the Washington State DOT4 show the following: Noise levels south of the Maple Valley Highway centerline for PM peak hour traffic: Distance Noise From Centerline Levels 200 feet 66 dbA 500 feet 61 dbA 700 feet 59 dbA 1000 feet 57 dbA Noise levels from construction equipment at specified distances is: 50 feet 100 feet 200 feet 400 feet Dump Truck 86 80 74 68 Bulldozer 80 74 68 62 Worst case noise impact on the park will occur when the construction equipment is filling the park property. From a technical perspective the Maple Valley Highway noise level is insignificant relative to the noise level of equipment constructing the fill. Consequently, the noise level shown in the chart above can be considered the worst case noise level. Following completion of the fill, the Park Department might choose to reconstruct the existing berm as a visual/noise barrier of the batch plant site. Occasionally, and intermittently, equipment will move through the fill area, following completion of the fill. As previously stated, it is intended that the use of the newly filled area continue to be a staging area for equipment and material. Dust - Material placed in the fill area will contain some water. Material placed with a water content too low to prevent dust will be watered during 2 Phone conversation with Bruce Farar, Washington State Department of Transportation, April 8, 1987. 0 Hugh G.Goldsmith &Associates,Inc Renton Building & Zoning Department Attn: Mr. Donald Erickson 23 April 1987 Page Four placement and compaction to minimize the creation of airborne dust par- ticles. Prevailing winds are typically from the west (S.W. or N.W.) and normally will help keep spurious dust from settling in the park. Glare - All the operations will occur during the day and no lights will be used during the filling operation. Therefore, the project will not create glare. 7. The erosion problem - the erosion issue was covered in item 2 above. 8. Possible impacts on the City's well system - The Well Field Pro- tection Study prepared for the City of Renton in August, 1984 by CH2MHILL addressed several issues related to the Stoneway. Batch Plant. None of the issues considered filling a portion of the site. However, the report did indicate that "The water table within the aquifer is generally at or near the elevation of the water surface in the Cedar River." By filling the site about ten feet the applicant would be more than doubling the amount of cover currently provided over the aquifer in the proposed fill area. . When the filling operation is completed the finished surface will be hard and relatively impervious to infiltration and percolation. The highly compacted fill will also act as a barrier to horizontal mitagation of pol- lutants from upstream of the fill site. The fill will also keep polluted flood water separated from the water table to a greater degree than pro- vided now. Since the proposed use of the fill area is continuation of the exist- ing use, the overall affect of placing the fill is seen to be a positive one relative to protection of the City's water supply. 9. . . .that the fill would not affect the floodway channel - Cedar River data used to generate the new FEMA maps was obtained from CH2MHILL. A new cross-section was added to the existing data at the location of the proposed fill. The HEC 2 program was then run to obtain new flood information based on the proposed fill. A report of the flood plain analysis is attached for your review. The attachments include a map showing the location of the cross-section, a print of a portion of the new draft FEMA map by CH2MHILL showing the study cross section location, computer print outs showing the before fill and after fill flood plain elevations, and a written report describing the analysis procedure. The conclusion reached in the study is that the fill will not affect the elevation of the 100 year flood plain. • rk_O Hugh G.Goldsmith &Associates,Inc. Renton Building & Zoning Department Attn: Mr. Donald Erickson 23 April 1987 Page Five 10. Information on haul routes - Since no sources of fill material have yet been identified it is not possible to describe haul routes to the proposed fill site. At best, it can be stated that the material will originate at locations within the economic haul distance from the propsed project site. Material generated outside the economic haul distance will be taken to other approved fill sites. Potential material sources are ex- pected to be within a radius of 8 to 10 miles from the fill project. Generally, dump trucks use major highways and freeways to transport their loads. Use of local access streets is usually limited to that needed for access to the source of the material. 11. Number of trips per day - It is anticipated that there will be an average of four to five trucks per hour arriving at the site during the work day. ' It is possible that as many as seven trucks per hour will arrive at the site during peak times. 12. Hours of peak impact - The nature of the anticipated sources of material (i.e., utility construction projects and foundation excavations) dictate that the truck traffic will be relatively uniform during the con- struction workday, roughly 7 AM to 4 PM. The applicant requested the permit be issued for 7 AM to 8 PM Monday through Saturday to provide the flexibility to work overtime if necessary during the summer construction season. Work would be suspended during evening hours if it conflicted with scheduled evening activities at the Cedar River Park. If additional information is needed to enable the City to complete processing of the grade and fill application, please contact me. Very truly yours, HUGH G. GOLDSMITH & ASSOCIATES, INC. ��ektiu� Richard D. Padrick, P.E. RDP:sar Enclosures cc: Don Merlino 0 Hugh G.coldsmith &Associates,Inc. DS/Dstk 11"J -`�0 ,C� q • IA i �1 CITY OF F NI `fi • t DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE �.j (MITIGATED) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO.: ECF-005-87 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SP-005-87, SM-002-87 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for special permit to allow the filling and grading on 3.88 acres of property with approximately 53,000 cubic yards of material in order to bring the property to grade with the remainder of the site, and substantial shorelines development permit to allow said fill and grading within 200 feet of Cedar River. PROPONENT: Stoneway Concrete and City of Renton Parks and Recreation Department LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Directly north of Cedar River at 1915 Maple Valley Highway. J LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2) (c) . This decision was made after review of an expanded environmental checklist and preliminary site plan, on file with the lead agency. Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-2822(D) Renton Municipal Code (see attached sheet) . These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340. ` The lead agency will not act on this proposal for fifteen (15) days from June 25, 1987. Any interested party may submit written comments which must be submitted by 5:00 p.m., July 10th in order to be considered. This Determination may be appealed by 5:00 p.m. on July 10th. Any appeal must be submitted in writting stating clearly reasons for revising the Determination and must be accompanied by a non-refundable $75.00 filing fee. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 235-2500 DATE OF DECISION: June 10, 1987 EFFECTIVE DATE: June 26, 1987 'GAL/.4�Er1. ,Ronald G. Nelson L y Sp ger 'Building and Zoning Director Policy ve ment Director Richard F Houghton Public W rks Director poreA () V Df - k1 • S1 yMM CITY OF RENTON ' DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE MITIGATION MEASURES ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO.: ECF-005-87 APPLICATION NO(S) .: SP-005-8. , SM-002-87 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for special permit to allow the filling and grading on 3.88 acres of property with approximately 53,000 cubic yards of material in order to bring the property to grade with the remainder of the site, and substantial shorelines development permit to allow said fill and grading within 200 feet of Cedar River. PROPONENT: Stoneway Concrete and City of Renton Parks and Recreation Department 1 LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 3 ^ CONDITIONS: 1. Haul routes and hours of operation`1 to be approved by Public Works, Policy Development, Parks and Recreation, and the State Department of Transportation. 2. All fill materials to be certified as to their cleanliness by a certified professional engineer. 3. Hours of filling are to be coordinated with the Parks and Recreation Department. / / 4. The north river bank is to be rip- rapped to the 100-year flood plain -, elevation. / f5 A fifteen (15) foot maintenance/ ��L;),/y�,�Ci-, 'access easement parallel to the -2 octig, /� edar River is to be granted to th L/City which could function as an eventual link between the Cedar ' River Park and residential areas to the east._ (6. /Additional conifers and evergreen � shrubbery should be added to buffer the adjacent Cedar River Park. nainski p587 CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO.: ECF-005-87— ------ , APPLICATION NO(S) .: SP-005-87, SM-002-87 • DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for special permit to --allow_ the filling and grading on 3.88 acres of property with approximately 53,000 cubic yards of material in order to bring the property to grade with the remainder of the site, and substantial shorelines development permit to allow said fill and grading within 200 feet of Cedar River. PROPONENT: Stoneway Concrete and City of Renton Parks and Recreation Department LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Directly north of Cedar River at 1915 Maple Valley Highway. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2) (c) . This decision was made after review of an expanded environmental checklist and preliminary site plan, on file with the lead agency. Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-2822(D) Renton Municipal Code (see attached sheet) . These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340. The lead agency will not act on this proposal for fifteen (15) days from August 3, 1987. Any interested party may submit written comments which must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. , August 17, 1987, in order to be considered. This Determination may be appealed by 5:00 p.m. on August 17, 1987. Any appeal must be submitted in writting stating clearly reasons for revising the Determination and must be accompanied by a non-refundable $75.00 filing fee. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 235-2500 DATE OF DECISION: July 29, 1987 EFFECTIVE DATE: August 3, 1987 Ro ald G. Nelson 1111W rr' . Spr•t ger Building and Zoning Director Poli. Deve lt.ment Director R1 and C./ oughton Public Wo s Director I skl StonwyMM CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE MITIGATION MEASURES ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO. : ECF-005-87 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SP-005-87, SM-002-87 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for special permit to allow the filling and grading on 3.88 acres of property with approximately 53,000 cubic yards of material in order to bring the property to grade with the remainder of the site, and substantial shorelines development permit to allow said fill and grading within 200 feet of Cedar River. PROPONENT: Stoneway Concrete and City of Renton Parks and Recreation Department LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: CONDITIONS: 1. Haul routes and hours of operation to be approved by Public Works, Policy Development, Parks and Recreation, and the State Department of Transportation. 2. All fill materials to be certified as to their cleanliness by a certified professional engineer. 3. Hours of filling are to be coordinated with the Parks and Recreation Department. 4.'A landscape/erosion buffer easement having a minimum width of 30 feet from the mean water level of the cedar River and a northern setback distance determined by the drip line of existing trees along the river's edge and running the full width of the western portion of the site from the western boundary (abutting Cedar River Park) east to the existing sedimentation pond is to be provided to visually screen the industrial uses on the site ,/ ✓ from recreational uses along the Cedar River as well as to create an erosion buffer from Cedar Riverj flooding; 5. Because of the fragile natural environment of the landscape buffer, fill materials shall be retained by earthern berms • beginning behind the landscape buffer; NOTE: If ecology blocks are used as a retention device for the proposed fill, they shall be bermed along their river side and shall be setback a minimum distance of 15 Determination of Non-significance P •- •gation Measures 2 feet from the landscaped buffer easement identified in item 4. ' above. l6. 11 bermed areas shall be andscaped with evergreen trees and plants as well as soil retained evergreen ground cover; and 7: Additional conifer and evergreen shrubbery shall be planted in the ' landscape/erosion buffer easement for erosion control as well as to create an aesthetic visual screen of heavy industrial uses on the site. it,2) —75` '1d30 DNINO7- FMCI !(lU ( 400h 47c; Dm' TT j) NO!NEn.i Ley fuVrDZ �1 dp( 3 agp 7 1 -91D-3 To' (r9 j a vi (milfrapj irc.cb -( /)( 2__E_-?Air( C/t//V u 6r+-06 Isw TIE (L -7G/It- c n S 40(i aka �r9vult,/ecor) 1,0-4, er o QL/ f2 pe ),)( dC, , o--7C r-V127719V 'S()Cepa ) -252.-* )6awv c'Osly gisN 'ri? r../10 n G° l c/(00 : Pam'/)ai rozrzra.i ci OA I Sc,u '7) fi-Pd • 1,0:Q211)1)s u.k L7.2-4-aci s,, SS' 61//tr r Jc• 0-17 al 0 (701/Ati I (12- -Vg(1 a7/t/ ?'(7 ( 1 p + r- _ ru(Lo r-2g10 172J(//d !LliQ/l(i� vec d ri,o3 oL ig _pr rt,__70 o cry i 1•4*-2 '•-f, I ' e0 rr umpumprn ( w U 7_,)7 1-2/09S---nlian-V I ! ) ff.(2 iu/w9v k-raici; C{,✓dou ®Q,J nc:J a , • , LAW OFFICES CASEY, PRUZAN & KOVARIK MERWIN E. CASEY 18TH FLOOR PACIFIC BUILDING CARL PRUZAN SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104 JOHN F. KOVARIK MARTIN A. GODSIL OF COUNSEL PHILLIP T. HUTCHISON (206) 623-3577 WILLIAM J. MORRIS RICHARD A. ACARREGUI DAVID G. SHENTON W. DIRKER EHLERT GARY R. ENGLISH PROVIDENCE WORLEY �a MICHAEL A. LARSON CITY Cu t,: ::41.01q' JANE RYAN KOLER .mac August 17, 1987 ,� IT' i.�: lq..j �fj � , AUG ' ,11 'e r J G 1.77q8-7 C lLD: :G/ZONING DEPT. Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Written Statement Appealing Mitigation Conditions Imposed on Fill and Fencing Proposal Dear Environment Review Committee: We represent Stoneway Concrete (°'Stoneway") . Stoneway appeals mitigating conditions 5 and 6 which were imposed on this development proposal upon issuance of a Revised Mitigated Declaration of Nonsignificance issued on August 3, 1987, by the City of Renton. Stoneway appeals conditions 5 and 6 because these conditions (1) were not imposed in compliance with the requirements governing the imposition of mitigating conditions which are articulated in WAC 197-11-660 and (2) constitute an unconstitutional taking of Stoneway°s property in violation of the taking clause of the Fifth Amendment, as incorporated against the state by the Fourteenth Amendment and the Ninth Amendment of the Washington State Constitution. Stoneway also appeals imposition of these conditions because the - City of Renton did not timely issue an initial threshold environmental determination and, thus, was without authority to impose these mitigation measures. I. FACTS k Our client operates a concrete batch plant located at 1915 Maple Valley Highway in Renton, Washington. The site is ,fie) presently zoned for heavy industrial use. Cedar River Park is If s� located west of the batch plant site, and the Cedar River runs along the southern boundary of the site. Stoneway filed an application for a grade and fill permit on January 27, 1987. On that date, Stoneway also submitted an environmental checklist to the City of Renton. Stoneway applied for a grading and fill permit in order to fill 3.88 acres of its f 0 Environmental Review Committee City of Renton August 17, 1987 -- Page 2 13 acre site to bring that area of the batch plant site to the same elevation as the remainder of the site. Creating a more even site will allow Stoneway to make more effective use of the site and correct some drainage problems at the site. In connection with this filling project, Stoneway will also finish installing a concrete block wall around the site. A concrete block wall already encloses some portions of the site (see Appendix A) . However, in order to completely enclose the site, Stoneway wishes to extend existing portions of the concrete block retaining wall. It is necessary to enclose the site for security purposes; small children who utilize Cedar River Park, which is located west of the site, frequently wander over to the batch plant site. This circumstance creates a dangerous situation which must be eliminated. Because a portion of the fill and fencing proposal is to be placed within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark, Stoneway also filed an application for a substantial development permit. Although the Renton Environmental Ordinance requires that the City issue a threshold determination within fifteen days of the submission of an environmental checklist, in the present case, a threshold determination was not timely issued within fifteen days of the date that the environmental checklist was submitted to the City (January 27, 1987) . Instead, on March 12, 1987, the City requested more information from the applicant about this project (Appendix B) . Stoneway provided this information to 'the City on April 23, 1987 (Appendix C) . Although Stoneway provided additional information to the City on April 23, 1987, the City did not issue a threshold determination within twenty days of that date. The City did not issue a threshold determination until July 1, 1987; on that date, the City issued a Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance ("MDN") (see Appendix D) . None of the mitigation measures set forth in the Determination of Nonsignificance was imposed in order to remedy probable adverse aesthetic impacts on (1) the view from the edge of the river on the Stoneway property and (2) the view from trails located across the river from the Stoneway property. Stoneway requested that the Environmental Review Committee reconsider mitigation conditions 4, 5 and 6, which were set forth in the July 1, 1987, MDN. Those conditions read as follows: Environmental Review Committee City of Renton August 17, 1987 -- Page 3 4 . The north river bank is to be rip-rapped to the 100-year flood plaint elevation. 5. A fifteen (15) foot maintenance/access easement parallel to the Cedar River is to be granted to the City which could function as an eventual link between the Cedar River Park and residential areas to the east. 6. Additional conifers and evergreen shrubbery should be added to buffer the adjacent Cedar River Park. Upon reconsideration, the Environmental Review Committee eliminated the above recited conditions and imposed the following mitigation measures: 4. A landscape/erosion buffer easement having a minimum width of 30 feet from the mean water level of the Cedar River and a northern setback distance determined by the drip line of existing trees along the river's edge and running the full width of the western portion of the site from the western boundary (abutting Cedar River Park) east to the existing sedimentation pond is to be provided to visually screen the industrial uses on the site from recreational uses along the Cedar River as well as to create an erosion buffer from Cedar River flooding; 5. Because of the fragile natural enviornment of the landscape buffer, fill materials shall be retained by earthern berms beginning behind the landscape buffer; NOTE: If ecology blocks are used as a retention device for the proposed fill, they shall be bermed along their river side and shall be setback a minimum distance of 15 feet from the landscaped • buffer easement identified in item 4 above. 6. All bermed areas shall be landscaped ';ith evergreen trees and plants as well as soil retained evergreen ground cover; and 7. Additional conifer and evergreen shrubbery shall • be planted in the landscape/erosion buffer easement for erosion control as well as to create Environmental Review Committee City of Renton August 17, 1987 -- Page 4 an aesthetic visual screen of heavy industrial uses on the site. The Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance issued on August 3, 1987, specified that the conditions 4 and 7, which are recited above, were imposed to (1) prevent soil erosion from occurring and (2) serve as a vegetative screen which would serve to screen off the industrial uses on the site for aesthetic purposes (see Appendix E) . However, the Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance did not specify what adverse environmental impact conditions 5 and 6 were imposed in order to mitigate. The City of Renton's Environmental Official, Donald Erickson, stated in a telephone conversation on August 13,_ 1987, that conditions 5 and 6 were imposed in order to prevent the concrete block retaining wall from adversely impacting on views (1) from the edge of the river and (2) from City trails across the river. The environmental document for this project (e.g. , the environmental checklist) J did not identify probable adverse impacts on river views. The environmental checklist and comments from various City departments about the development proposal only focus on one adverse aesthetic impact of the project. These documents state that the filling and fencing proposal will have an adverse visual impact on the view from the park and Maple Valley Highway. However, the relevant environmental document (e.g. , the environmental checklist) does not express any concern about adverse impacts on the view from the edge of the river and from trails across the river from the site. Presumably, no concern about such aesthetic impacts were expressed in the environmental documents for the project because the edge of the river adjacent to the site is located on J Richard Settle, a noted commentator on environmental law states: "SEPA conditions are only allowed to mitigate specific adverse environmental impacts clearly identified in an environmental document, that is, a .checklist, or other threshold determination document, or an EIS. " R. Settle, The Washington State Environmental Policy Act; A Legal and Policy Analysis, §18 (1987) . Environmental Review Committee City of Renton August 17, 1987 -- Page 5 Stoneway property. Because the edge of the river near the site is private property, which is owned by the applicant, the City was probably unconcerned about the view from that vantage point. II. CONDITIONS 5 AND 6 DO NOT COMPLY WITH THE REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE IMPOSITION OF MITIGATION CONDITIONS WHICH ARE ARTICULATED IN WAC 197-11-660 A. Conditions 5 and 6 violate WAC 197-11-660(a) and (b) . WAC 197-11-660, which implements the terms of RCW 43.21C. 060, sets forth various restrictions on the City's authority to mitigate development proposals. WAC 197-11-660 states in relevant part: (a) Mitigation measures or denials shall be based on policies, plans, rules, or regulations formally designated by the agency (or appropriate legislative body, in the case of local government) as a basis for the exercise of substantive authority and in effect when the DNS or DEIS is issued. (b) Mitigation measures shall be related to specific, adverse environmental impacts clearly identified in an environmental document on the proposal and shall be stated in writing by the decision maker. The decision maker shall cite the agency SEPA policy that is the basis of any condition or denial under this chapter (for proposals of applicants) . After its decision, each agency shall make available to the public a document that states the decision. The document shall state the mitigation measures, if any, that will be implemented as a part of the decision, including any monitoring of environmental impacts. Such a document may be the license itself, or may be combined with other 'agency documents, or may reference relevant portions of environmental documents. (c) Mitigation measures shall be reasonable and capable of being accomplished. (d) Responsibility for implementing mitigation measures may be imposed upon an applicant only to the extent attributable to the identified adverse impacts of its proposal. Voluntary additional mitigation may occur. S tl Environmental Review Committee City of Renton August 17, 1987 -- Page 6 In the present situation, the City did not follow the above described requirements in formulating various mitigation measures for this project. First, the City failed to specify the identified environmental policies on which conditions 5 and 6 were based. Second, the City did not state what adverse environmental impact the above recited conditions were devised in order to correct as required by WAC 197-11-660(b) . WAC 197-11-660(b) clearly states that mitigation measures must be related to specific adverse environmental impacts clearly identified in an environmental document on the proposal. In this case, the relevant environmental document (e.g. , the environmental checklist) did not specify any adverse environmental impacts which pertained to thess mitigation measures. (Environmental Official Donald Erickson indicates that these measures were imposed to prevent the retaining wall proposed for the southern boundary of the property from impairing views from the river. ) The environmental checklist only discussed the probable adverse visual impact of this development proposal on the view from Cedar River Park and the Maple Valley Highway. The environmental checklist stated: 10. What views in the immediate vicinity will be altered or obstructed? Stored concrete products may be more visible from the adjacent park and Maple Valley Highway. . -. 11. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts if any. A six-foot fence with ivy on the west property line will significantly mitigate any view impact. A six-foot fence with ivy and four to five feet Douglas firs, at fifteen feet centers, along the north property line will mitigate any view impact from the north. In this case, the environmental document did not discuss the visual impact of the this project on views from the edge of the Cedar River and from City trails located across the river from the site. Thus, mitigation measures 5 and 6 are not related to specific, adverse environmental impacts clearly identified in an environmental document on the proposal. d 4 r • Environmental Review Committee City of Renton August 17, 1987 -- Page 7 B. Conditions 5 and 6 violate WAC 197-11-660 (d) , which specifies that mitigation measures may be imposed only to the extent necessary in order to mitigate adverse environmental impacts. Conditions 5 and 6 were improperly imposed because imposition of these conditions is not necessary in order to mitigate any adverse environmental impacts associated with this filling and fencing proposal. Although Renton's Environmental Official, Donald Erickson, indicated that this condition was imposed for the purpose of screening off the concrete retaining wall which Stoneway proposes to install near the southern boundary of its property, it is unnecessary to impose this condition in order to accomplish that objective. The thirty-foot landscape easement (required by mitigating condition 4 of the revised Determination of Non-Significance) , which will be located in front of the concrete retaining wall, will serve to screen off the wall from the edge of the river. Hence, conditions 5 and 6 are unnecessary to mitigate an adverse environmental impact associated with this project. C. Conditions 5 and 6 constitute an unconstitutional taking of Stoneway's property. Because there is no connection between the imposition of conditions 5 and 6 and the mitigation of adverse environmental impacts, conditions 5 and 6 constitute an unconstitutional taking of Stoneway's property, which violates the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution, which is made applicable to the states by the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution. The conditions also violate the Ninth Amendment of the Washington State Constitution (Article I, Section 16) , which prohibits the government from taking private property without just compensation. Recently, the United States Supreme Court considered when the imposition of a development condition constitutes a compensable taking. Nollan v. California Coastal Commission, 55 L.W. 5145 (June 26, 1987) , held that a condition imposed upon granting a building permit was improper and constituted a taking of the Nollans' property. In that case, the Nollans applied for a building permit in order to construct a house on their beachfront lot. The California Coastal Commission approved the issuance of a building permit to the Nollans on the condition that they grant the public an easement to pass across their beach, which was located between two public beaches. • Environmental Review Committee City of Renton August 17, 1987 -- Page 8 The California Coastal Commission stated that the condition was imposed to (1) protect the public's ability to see the beach, (2) assist the public in overcoming a perceived psychological barrier to use of the beach, and (3) prevent beach congestion. The California Coastal Commission also justified the imposition of this condition on the basis that the access easement was imposed as part of the comprehensive state program to provide beach access to members of the general public. The United States Supreme Court held that none of the above reasons was legitimately connected to the building permit condition which required the provision of a public access easement. The Supreme Court also observed that furthering the state goal of providing public access to the beach was improper justification for the imposition of the access easement requirement: Although the state is free to advance its comprehensive program by exercising its eminant domain power and paying for access easements, it cannot compel coastal residents alone to contribute to the realization of that goal. 55 L.W. at 5147. The court concluded that there must be a tight connection between the ends advanced as justification for a development condition and the condition which is imposed. Accordingly, the court held that requiring the Nollans to donate an access easement constituted a permanent taking of the Nollans property because the grant of the shoreline access easement effectively involved a permanent occupation of the Nollans property for a government purpose. The court observed that development conditions are invalid when there is not a specific connection between the government purpose served and the condition imposed: The evident constitutional propriety disappears, however, if the condition substituted for the prohibition utterly fails to further the end advanced as the justification for the prohibition. When that essential nexus is eliminated, the situation becomes the same as if California law forbade shouting fire in a crowded theater, but granted dispensations to those will to contribute $100 to the state treasury. While a ban on shouting fire can be a core exercise of the State's police power to protect the public safety, and can thus meet even our stringent standards for regulation of speech, adding the unrelated condition Environmental Review Committee City of Renton August 17, 1987 -- Page 9 alters the purpose to one which, while it may be legitimate, is inadequate to sustain the ban. Therefore, even though, in a sense, requiring a $100 tax contribution in order to shout fire is a lesser restriction on speech than an outright ban, it would not pass constitutional muster. Similarly here, the lack of nexus between the condition and the original purpose of the building restriction converts that purpose to something other than what it was. The purpose then becomes, quite simply, the obtaining of an easement to serve some valid governmental purpose, but without payment of compensation. Whatever may be the outer limits of "legitimate state interests" in the takings and land use context, this is not one of them. In short, unless the permit condition serves the same governmental purpose as the development ban, the building restriction is not a valid regulation of land use but "an out-and-out plan of extortion.". . . 55 L.W. at 5148. The analysis of Nollan v. California Coastal Commission indicates that conditions 5 and 6 constitute an unconstitutional taking of Stoneway's property. Here, the City of Renton has asked Stoneway to set aside a 15' x 430' area on its property for a landscaped berm. The imposition of this condition does not further a valid governmental objective. The purpose of the landscaped berm is to screen off the retaining wall, proposed to be constructed along the southern boundary of the property from the area of the river. It is unnecessary to impose conditions 5 and 6 in order to accomplish the objective of screening off the retaining wall from the area of the river because the thirty-foot landscaped easement area located in front of the retaining wall (condition 4) will serve the same purpose. Thus, there is neither a specific connection between the imposition of conditions 5 and 6 and the realization of a valid governmental objective nor is this condition specifically connected to the grant of a grading and fill permit. . Conditions 5 and 6, which require Stoneway to permanently reserve a 15' x 430' area of its property for landscaping and berming purposes, constitutes an impermissible taking of Stoneway's property. The property which the City is requiring Stoneway to set aside exclusively for landscaping and berming is prime industrial property which sells for $10 per square foot. The effect of conditions 5 and 6 is to deprive Stoneway of the right to utilize a 6,450 area portion of its property which has a fair market value of $64,500. Conditions 5 and 6 effectively p ' g Environmental Review Committee City of Renton August 17, 1987 -- Page 10 constitute a permanent occupation of a 6,450 square foot area of the Stoneway property for a governmental purpose; such a requirement is a compensible taking within the meaning of Nollan v. California Coastal Commission, supra. D. Conditions 5 and 6 run afoul of WAC 197-11-660 (c) because conditions 5 and 6 are unreasonable. WAC 197-11-660(c) states that "mitigation measures shall be reasonable and capable of being accomplished." Conditions 5 and 6 are unreasonable because these conditions are redundant and do not serve to directly mitigate any adverse environmental impacts (see Section B) . Conditions 5 and 6 are also unreasonable because compliance with these conditions would impose an undue hardship on Stoneway. Compliance with conditions 5 and 6 will require Stoneway to move its pumphouse. The pumphouse is located on the western portion of the property. In order to prevent either (1) children from playing in the pumphouse and possibly sustaining injuries or (2) the pumphouse from being vandalized, it is necessary for the pumphouse to be located within the confines of the wall which will be erected around the property. If Stoneway is constrained to comply with conditions 5 and 6, in addition to complying with condition 4 which requires the provision of a thirty-foot landscaped easement, then it will be necessary for Stoneway to relocate its pumphouse. However, were Stoneway only required to comply with condition 4, it would be unnecessary to move the pumphouse. In order to move the pumphouse, Stoneway would be compelled to incur enormous expense. Because conditions 5 and 6 serve to mitigate no adverse environmental impact, are redundant, and financially burdensome. These conditions unreasonable mitigating measures. III. BECAUSE THE CITY DID NOT TIMELY CONDUCT ENVORNMENT REVIEW/ THE CITY WAS WITHOUT AUTHORITY TO IMPOSE MITIGATION MEASURES ON THIS DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL. The Renton Environmental Ordinance at Section 4.2808 (B) clearly provides that the City must issue its initial threshold determination within either (1) fifteen days of the submission of the environmental checklist or f2) twenty days after the applicant has provided additional information about a particular proposal upon request of the City. Section 4.2808(B) states: (B) Threshold Determinations: 1. Threshold determinations not requiring further information from the applicant or 6'' 4 Environmental Review Committee City of Renton August 17, 1987 -- Page 11 consultation with agencies with jurisdiction should be completed within fifteen (15) days of submission of an adequate application and the completed check list. 2. Threshold determinations requiring further information from the applicant or connsultation with other agencies with jurisdiction should be completed within twenty (20) days of receiving the requested information from the applicant or the consulted agency; requests by the City for such further information should be made within twenty (20) days of the submission of an adequate application and completed check list; when a request for further information is submitted to a consulted agency, the City shall wait a maximum of thirty (30) days for the consulted agency to respond. Here, the City did not timely issue its initial threshold determination. After Stoneway submitted an environmental checklist on January 27, 1987, the City requested additional information from the applicant on March 12, 1987. After receiving the additional information on April 23, 1987, the City waited until July 1, 1987, to issue its initial threshold determination. Instead, the City ought to have issued this determination within twenty days of April 23, the date on which the applicant provided the City with the additional information as requested. A City is without inherent authority. A City only has authority which is specifically delegated to it by statute and regulation. F. Schnidman, Handling the Land Use Case, §2.22 (1983) . Here, under the City's Environmental Ordinance, the City has the authority only to issue a threshold determination either within fifteen days of the date that the enviornmental checklist was submitted or within twenty days of the date that the applicant provided additional environmental information. Because the City did not timely issue its initial threshold determination in accord with the requirements set forth in the Renton Environmental Ordinance, the City was without authority to impose mitigating measures on the present development proposal. Accordingly, when the City of Renton imposed mitigation measures on the present development proposal in its July 1, 1987, Determination of Non-Significance and its August 3, 1987, Determination of Non-Significance, these actions were ultra vires; the City was without authority to impose c '> P Environmental Review Committee City of Renton August 17, 1987 -- Page 12 mitigation measures because the City did not do so in accord with the relevant municipal requirements. IV. CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, we respectfully request that the City retract mitigation measures no. 5 and no. 6. Very truly yours, CASEY, PRUZAN & KOVARIK Ja Ryan Koler Attachments cc: Stoneway Concrete JRK/dmb Li c °I) tr.71 Mitz,Ionvfi 7 '020 d/J-. 20k -/VA' C-79Pk-f/12 S- Aoh (._\ LrtIn11;..„ .."KTI .-°(t.ifwivEl -1-2.ide( 3 wiva\A - rr9 Agi.) ro-ra* r -svp d .A9.1 av ri9Cdi .( :5 di .2- C, r�� J - /IOW i)srie./c-frls, (-2./ 4ou unfpa,rqo Qv F9 Pe4 ' f7c r1/‘//rirPu(700 Jed-fp/sand) 6revoiviv "15,07 rao:peif po),yciole--or c:oetiew-o r-A0 �G,. (-.° / tow( maw] rol-er-a- uoAdp.ls-Gvi---00,vi - 17' 671-P1 ufriPDPI sum] C--01)0-1 ef7 0 • -)1//1 'TY-kW-0 '-crntf2lits_O r0/9/TVI --e7W pqr2+, y-fAticp Sarno £dWW .}0dC -2-,rr ( cry �''� )w; 7 ;a, 9G(4'°'/,'fft)°.6i/(/-9- W-pc-firbrfi ( ?JP-1u c)- ) Enos�nl���-�-'- j I o i ouvri! tom,;J 1 id iu 0,1 n ci; ' • • 1 6 LAW OFFICES • CASEY, PRUZAN & KOVARIK MERWIN E. CASEY 18TH FLOOR PACIFIC SUILDING CARL PRUZAN SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104 JOHN F. KOVARIK OF COUNSEL PHILLIP T. HUTCHISON MARTIN A. GODSIL (206) 623-3577 WILLIAM J. MORRIS RICHARD A. ACARREGUI DAVID G. SHENTON W. DIRKER EHLERT GARY R. ENGLISH PROVIDENCE WORLEY MICHAEL A. LARSON CITY CT RtNITON JANE RYAN KOLER August 17, 1987E)-.1"C't:3 rgu., ) Lg 0- PvUILDeNG/ZONING DEPT. Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 . Re: Written Statement Appealing Mitigation Conditions Imposed on Fill and Fencing Proposal Dear Environment Review Committee: We represent Stoneway Concrete ("Stoneway") . Stoneway appeals mitigating conditions 5 and 6 which were imposed on this development proposal .upon issuance of a Revised Mitigated Declaration of Nonsignificance issued on August 3, 1987, by the City of Renton. Stoneway appeals conditions 5 and 6 because these conditions (1) were not imposed in compliance with the requirements governing the imposition of mitigating conditions which are articulated in WAC 197-11-660 and (2) constitute an unconstitutional taking of Stoneway's property in violation of the taking clause of the Fifth Amendment, as incorporated against the state by the Fourteenth Amendment and the Ninth Amendment of the Washington State Constitution. Stoneway also appeals imposition of these conditions because the City of Renton did not timely issue an initial threshold environmental determination and, thus, was without authority to impose these mitigation measures. I. FACTS Our client operates a concrete batch plant located at 1915 Maple Valley Highway in Renton, Washington. The site is presently zoned for heavy industrial use. Cedar River Park is located west of the batch plant site, and the Cedar River runs along the southern boundary of the site. Stoneway filed an application for a grade and fill permit on January 27, 1987. On that date, Stoneway also submitted an environmental checklist to the City of Renton. Stoneway applied for a grading and fill permit in order to fill 3 .88 acres of its Environmental Review Committee City of Renton August 17, 1987 -- Page 2 13 acre site to bring that area of the batch plant site to the same elevation as the remainder of the site. Creating a more even site will allow Stoneway to make more effective use of the site and correct some drainage problems at the site. In connection with this filling project, Stoneway will also finish installing a concrete block wall around the site. A concrete block wall already encloses some portions of the site (see Appendix A) . However, in order to completely enclose the site, Stoneway wishes to extend existing portions of the concrete block retaining wall. It is necessary to enclose the site for security purposes; small children who utilize Cedar River Park, which is located west of the site, frequently wander over to the batch plant site. This circumstance creates a dangerous situation which must be eliminated. Because a portion of the fill and fencing proposal is to be placed within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark, Stoneway also filed an application for a substantial development permit. Although the Renton Environmental Ordinance requires that the City issue a threshold determination within fifteen days of the submission of an environmental checklist, in the present case, a threshold determination was not timely issued within fifteen days of the date that the environmental checklist was submitted to the City (January 27, 1987) . Instead, on March 12, 1987, the City requested more information from the applicant about this project (Appendix B) . Stoneway provided this information to the City on April 23, 1987 (Appendix C) . Although Stoneway provided additional information to the City on April 23, 1987, the City did not issue a threshold determination within twenty days of that date. The City did not issue a threshold determination until July 1, 1987 ; on that date, the City issued a Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance ("MDN") (see Appendix D) . None of the mitigation measures set forth in the Determination of Nonsignificance was imposed in order to remedy probable adverse aesthetic impacts on (1) the view from the edge of the river on the Stoneway property and (2) the view from trails located across the river from the Stoneway property. Stoneway requested that the Environmental Review Committee reconsider mitigation conditions 4, 5 and 6, which were set forth in the July 1, 1987, MDN. Those conditions read as follows: Environmental Review Committee City of Renton August 17, 1987 -- Page 3 4. The north river bank is to be rip-rapped to the 100-year flood plaint elevation. 5. A fifteen (15) foot maintenance/access easement parallel to the Cedar River is to be granted to the City which could function as an eventual link between the Cedar River -Park and residential areas to the east. 6. Additional conifers and evergreen shrubbery should be added to buffer the adjacent Cedar River Park. Upon reconsideration, the Environmental Review Committee eliminated the above recited conditions and imposed the following mitigation measures: 4. A landscape/erosion buffer easement having a minimum width of 30 feet from the mean water level of the Cedar River and a northern setback distance determined by the drip line of existing trees along the river's edge and running the full width of the western portion of the site from the western boundary (abutting Cedar River Park) east to the existing sedimentation pond is to be provided to visually screen the industrial uses on the site from recreational uses along the Cedar River as well as to create an erosion buffer from Cedar River flooding; 5. Because of the fragile natural enviornment of the landscape buffer, fill materials shall be retained by earthern berms beginning behind the landscape buffer; NOTE: If ecology blocks are used as a retention device for the proposed fill, they shall be bermed along their river side and shall be setback a minimum distance of 15 feet from the landscaped buffer easement identified in item 4 above. 6. All bermed areas shall be landscaped with evergreen trees and plants as well •as soil retained evergreen ground cover; and 7. Additional conifer and evergreen shrubbery shall be planted in the landscape/erosion buffer easement for erosion control as well as to create Environmental Review Committee City of Renton August 17, 1987 -- Page 4 an aesthetic visual screen of heavy industrial uses on the site. The Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance issued on August 3, 1987, specified that the conditions 4 and 7, which are recited above, were imposed to (1) prevent soil erosion from occurring and (2) serve as a vegetative screen which would serve to screen off the industrial uses on the site for aesthetic purposes (see Appendix E) . However, the Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance did not specify what adverse environmental impact conditions 5 and 6 were imposed in order to mitigate. The City of Renton's Environmental Official, Donald Erickson, stated in a telephone conversation on August 13, 1987, that conditions 5 and 6 were imposed in order to prevent the concrete block retaining wall from adversely impacting on views (1) from the edge of the river and (2) from City trails across the river. The environmental document for this project (e.g. , the environmental checklist) 1/ did not identify probable adverse impacts on river views. The environmental checklist and comments from various City departments about the development proposal only focus on one adverse aesthetic impact of the project. These documents state that the filling and fencing proposal will have an adverse visual impact on the view from the park and Maple Valley Highway. However, the relevant environmental document (e.g. , the environmental checklist) does not express any concern about adverse impacts on the view from the edge of the river and from trails across the river from the site. Presumably, no concern about such aesthetic impacts were expressed in the environmental documents for the project because the edge of the river adjacent to the site is located on J Richard Settle, a noted commentator on environmental law states: "SEPA conditions are only allowed to mitigate specific adverse environmental impacts clearly identified in an environmental document, that is, a checklist, or other threshold determination document, or an EIS." R. Settle, The Washington State Environmental Policy Act; A Legal and Policy Analysis, §18 (1987) . 7 � Environmental Review Committee City of Renton August 17, 1987 -- Page 5 Stoneway property. Because the edge of the river near the site is private property, which is owned by the applicant, the City was probably unconcerned about the view from that vantage point. II. CONDITIONS 5 AND 6 DO NOT COMPLY WITH THE REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE IMPOSITION OF MITIGATION CONDITIONS WHICH ARE ARTICULATED IN WAC 197-11-660 A. Conditions 5 and 6 violate WAC 197-11-660(a) and (b) . WAC 197-11-660, which implements the terms of RCW 43.21C. 060, sets forth various restrictions on the City's authority to mitigate development proposals. WAC 197-11-660 states in relevant part: (a) Mitigation measures or denials shall be based on policies, plans, rules, or regulations formally designated by the agency (or appropriate legislative body, in the case of local government) as a basis for the exercise of substantive authority and in effect when the DNS or DEIS is issued. (b) Mitigation measures shall be related to specific, adverse environmental impacts clearly identified in an environmental document on the proposal and shall be stated in writing by the decision maker. The decision maker shall cite the agency SEPA policy that is the basis of any condition or denial under this chapter (for proposals of applicants) . After its decision, each agency shall make available to the public a document that states the decision. The document shall state the mitigation measures, if any, that will be implemented as a part of the decision, including any monitoring of environmental impacts. Such a document may be the license itself, or may be combined with other agency documents, or may reference relevant portions of environmental documents. (c) Mitigation measures shall be reasonable and capable of being accomplished. (d) Responsibility for implementing mitigation measures may be imposed upon an applicant only to the extent attributable to the identified adverse impacts of its proposal. Voluntary additional mitigation may occur. r • Environmental Review Committee City of Renton August 17, 1987 -- Page 6 In the present situation, the City did not follow the above described requirements in formulating various mitigation measures for this project. First, the City failed to specify the identified environmental policies on which conditions 5 and 6 were based. Second, the City did not state what adverse environmental impact the above recited conditions were devised in order to correct as required by WAC 197-11-660(b) . WAC 197-11-660 (b) clearly states that mitigation measures must be related to specific adverse environmental impacts clearly identified in an environmental document on the proposal. In this case, the relevant environmental document (e.g. , the environmental checklist) did not specify any adverse environmental impacts which pertained to thess mitigation measures. (Environmental Official Donald Erickson indicates that these measures were imposed to prevent the retaining wall proposed for the southern boundary of the property from impairing views from the river. ) The environmental checklist only discussed the probable adverse visual impact of this development proposal on the view from Cedar River Park and the Maple Valley Highway. The environmental checklist stated: 10. What views in the immediate vicinity will be altered or obstructed? Stored concrete products may be more visible from the adjacent park and Maple Valley Highway. 11. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts if any. A six-foot fence with ivy on the west property line will significantly mitigate any view impact. A six-foot fence with ivy and four to five feet Douglas firs, at fifteen feet centers, along the north property line will mitigate any view impact from the .north. In this case, the environmental document did not discuss the visual impact of the this project on views from the edge of the Cedar River and from City trails located across the river from the site. Thus, mitigation measures 5 and 6 are not related. to specific, adverse environmental impacts clearly identified in an environmental document on the proposal. k Environmental Review Committee City of Renton August 17, 1987 -- Page 7 B. Conditions 5 and 6 violate WAC 197-11-660(d) , which specifies that mitigation measures may be imposed only to the extent necessary in order to mitigate adverse environmental impacts. Conditions 5 and 6 were improperly imposed because imposition of these conditions is not necessary in order to mitigate any adverse environmental impacts associated with this filling and fencing proposal. Although Renton's Environmental Official, Donald Erickson, indicated that this condition was imposed for the purpose of screening off the concrete retaining wall which Stoneway proposes to install near the southern boundary of its property, it is unnecessary to impose this condition in order to accomplish that objective. The thirty-foot landscape easement (required by mitigating condition 4 of the revised Determination of Non-Significance) , which will be located in front of the concrete retaining wall, will serve to screen off the wall from the edge of the river. Hence, conditions 5 and 6 are unnecessary to mitigate an adverse environmental impact associated with this project. C. Conditions 5 and 6 constitute an unconstitutional taking of Stoneway's property. Because there is no connection between the imposition of conditions 5 and 6 and the mitigation of adverse environmental impacts, conditions 5 and 6 constitute an unconstitutional taking of Stoneway's property, which violates the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution, which is made applicable to the states by the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution. The conditions also violate the Ninth Amendment of the Washington State Constitution (Article I, Section 16) , which prohibits the government from taking private property without just compensation. Recently, the United States Supreme Court considered when the imposition of a development condition constitutes a compensable taking. Nollan v. California Coastal Commission, 55 L.W. 5145 (June 26, 1987) , held that a condition imposed upon granting a building permit was improper and constituted a taking of the Nollans' property. In that case, the Nollans applied for a building permit in order to construct a house on their beachfront lot. The California Coastal Commission approved the issuance of a building permit to the Nollans on the condition that they grant the public an easement to pass across their beach, which was located between two public beaches. Environmental Review Committee City of Renton August 17, 1987 -- Page 8 The California Coastal Commission stated that the condition was imposed to (1) protect the public's ability to see the beach, (2) assist the public in overcoming a perceived psychological barrier to use of the beach, and (3) prevent beach congestion. The California Coastal Commission also justified the imposition of this condition on the basis that the access easement was imposed as part of the comprehensive state program to provide beach access to members of the general public. The United States Supreme Court held that none of the above reasons was legitimately connected to the building permit condition which required the provision of a public access easement. The Supreme Court also observed that furthering the state goal of providing public access to the beach was improper justification for the imposition of the access easement requirement: Although the state is free to advance its comprehensive program by exercising its eminant domain power and paying for access easements, it cannot compel coastal residents alone to contribute to the realization of that goal. 55 L.W. at 5147. The court concluded that there must be a tight connection between the ends advanced as justification for a development condition and the condition which is imposed. Accordingly, the court held that requiring the Nollans to donate an access easement constituted a permanent taking of the Nollans property because the grant of the shoreline access easement effectively involved a permanent occupation of the Nollans property for a government purpose. The court observed that development conditions are invalid when there is not a specific connection between the government purpose served and the condition imposed: The evident constitutional propriety disappears, however, if the condition substituted for the prohibition utterly fails to further the end advanced as the justification for the prohibition. When that essential nexus is eliminated, the situation becomes the same as if California law forbade shouting fire in a crowded theater, but granted dispensations to those will to contribute $100 to the state treasury. While a ban on shouting fire can be a core exercise of the State's police power to protect the public safety, and can thus meet even our stringent standards for regulation of speech, adding the unrelated condition Environmental Review Committee City of Renton August 17, 1987 -- Page 9 alters the purpose to one which, while it may be legitimate, is inadequate to sustain the ban. Therefore, even though, in a sense, requiring a $100 tax contribution in order to shout fire is a lesser restriction on speech than an outright ban, it would not pass constitutional muster. Similarly here, the lack of nexus between the condition and the original purpose of the building restriction converts that purpose to something other than what it was. The purpose then becomes, quite simply, the obtaining of an easement to serve some valid governmental purpose, but without payment of compensation. Whatever may be the outer limits of "legitimate state interests" in the takings and land use context, this is not one of them. In short, unless the permit condition serves the same governmental purpose as the development ban, the building restriction is not a valid regulation of land use but "an out-and-out plan of extortion.". . . 55 L.W. at 5148. The analysis of Nollan v. California Coastal Commission indicates that conditions 5 and 6 constitute an unconstitutional taking of Stoneway's property. Here, the City of Renton has asked Stoneway to set aside a 15' x 430' area on its property for a landscaped berm. The imposition of this condition does not further a valid governmental objective. The purpose of the landscaped berm is to screen off the retaining wall, proposed to be constructed along the southern boundary of the property from the area of the river. It is unnecessary to impose conditions 5 and 6 in order to accomplish the objective of screening off the retaining wall from the area of the river because the thirty-foot landscaped easement area located in front of the retaining wall (condition 4) will serve the same purpose. Thus, there is neither a specific connection between the imposition of conditions 5 and 6 and the realization of a valid governmental objective nor is this condition specifically connected to the grant of a grading and fill permit. Conditions 5 and 6, which require Stoneway to permanently reserve a 15' x 430' area of its property for landscaping and berming purposes, constitutes an impermissible taking of Stoneway's property. The property which the City is requiring Stoneway to set aside exclusively for landscaping and berming is prime industrial property which sells for $10 per square foot. The effect of conditions 5 and 6 is to deprive Stoneway of the right to utilize a 6,450 area portion of its property which has a fair market value of $64,500. Conditions 5 and 6 effectively • Environmental Review Committee City of Renton August 17, 1987 -- Page 10 constitute a permanent occupation of a 6,450 square foot area of the Stoneway property for a governmental purpose; such a requirement is a compensible taking within the meaning of Nollan v. California Coastal Commission, supra. D. Conditions 5 and 6 run afoul of WAC 197-11-660(c) because conditions 5 and 6 are unreasonable. WAC 197-11-660(c) states that "mitigation measures shall be reasonable and capable of being accomplished." Conditions 5 and 6 are unreasonable because these conditions are redundant and do not serve to directly mitigate any adverse environmental impacts (see Section B) . Conditions 5 and 6 are also unreasonable because compliance with these conditions would impose an undue hardship on Stoneway. Compliance with conditions 5 and 6 will require Stoneway to move its pumphouse. The pumphouse is located on the western portion of the property. In order to prevent either (1) children from playing in the pumphouse and possibly sustaining injuries or (2) the pumphouse from being vandalized, it is necessary for the pumphouse to be located within the confines of the wall which will be erected around the property. If Stoneway is constrained to comply with conditions 5 and 6, in addition to complying with condition 4 which requires the provision of a thirty-foot landscaped easement, then it will be necessary for Stoneway to relocate its pumphouse. However, were Stoneway only required to comply with condition 4, it would be unnecessary to move the pumphouse. In order to move the pumphouse, Stoneway would be compelled to incur enormous expense. Because conditions 5 and 6 serve to mitigate no adverse environmental impact, are redundant, and financially burdensome. These conditions unreasonable mitigating measures. III. BECAUSE THE CITY DID NOT TIMELY CONDUCT ENVORNMENT REVIEW, THE CITY WAS WITHOUT AUTHORITY TO IMPOSE MITIGATION MEASURES ON THIS DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL. The Renton Environmental Ordinance at Section 4.2808 (B) clearly provides that the City must issue its initial threshold determination within either (1) fifteen days of the submission of the environmental checklist or (2) twenty days after the applicant has provided additional information about a particular proposal upon request of the City. Section 4.2808 (B) states: (B) Threshold Determinations: 1. Threshold determinations not requiring further information from the applicant or Environmental Review Committee City of Renton August 17, 1987 -- Page 11 consultation with agencies with jurisdiction should be completed within fifteen (15) days of submission of an adequate application and the completed check list. 2. Threshold determinations requiring further information from the applicant or connsultation with other agencies with jurisdiction should be completed within twenty (20) days of receiving the requested information from the applicant or the consulted agency; requests by the City for such further information should be made within twenty (20) days of the submission of an adequate application and completed check list; when a request for further information is submitted to a consulted agency, the City shall wait a maximum of thirty (30) days for the consulted agency to respond. Here, the City did not timely issue its initial threshold determination. After Stoneway submitted an environmental checklist on January 27, 1987, the City requested additional information from the applicant on March 12, 1987. After receiving the additional information on April 23, 1987, the City waited until July 1, 1987, to issue its initial threshold determination. Instead, the City ought to have issued this determination within twenty days of April 23, the date on which the applicant provided the City with the additional information as requested. A City is without inherent authority. A City only has authority which is specifically delegated to it by statute and regulation. F. Schnidman, Handling the Land Use Case, §2 .22 (1983) . Here, under the City's Environmental Ordinance, the City has the authority only to issue a threshold determination either within fifteen days of the date that the enviornmental checklist was submitted or within twenty days of the date that the applicant provided additional environmental information. Because the City did not timely issue its initial threshold determination in accord with the requirements set forth in the Renton Environmental Ordinance, the City was without authority to impose mitigating measures on the present development proposal. Accordingly, when the City of Renton imposed mitigation measures on the present development proposal in its July 1, 1987, Determination of Non-Significance and its August 3, 1987, Determination of Non-Significance, these actions were ultra vires; the City was without authority to impose Environmental Review Committee City of Renton August 17, 1987 -- Page 12 mitigation measures because the City did not do so in accord with the relevant municipal requirements. IV. CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, we respectfully request that the City retract mitigation measures no. 5 and no. 6. Very truly yours, CASEY, PRUZAN & KOVARIK Ja Ryan Koler Attachments cc: Stoneway Concrete JRK/dmb a sTATEo RECEIVED 8//7/F7 PUBUC WORKS DEPT. ` CITY OF RENTON ANDREA BEATTY RINIKER • "��'��::;;;. Director y 1889 day STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Mail Stop PV-11 • Olympia, Washington 98504-8711 • (206) 459-6000 • August 14, 1987 Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Dear Sirs : Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the determination of nonsignificance for the filling and grading of 3 . 88 acres by Stoneway Concrete and the City of Renton (ECF-005-87) . We reviewed the environmental checklist and have the following comments. As noted in the checklist , a shoreline permit will be re- quired for this project . The proposed project must comply with the goals and standards of the local shoreline master program. If you have any questions , please call Ms. Terra Prodan of the Shorelands Program at (206) 459-6789. Sincerely, Barbara J. ntchie Environmental Review Section BJR: cc: Linda Rankin, Shorelands 4ratF RECEIVED 8//7/F7 1 i�!1 x PUBLIC WORKS DEPT.Y ANDREA BEATTY RINIKER v.�iH lyo� CITY OF RE Director '�I;89 d� RENT ON � STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY • Mail Stop PV-11 • Olympia, Washington 98504-8711 • (206) 459-6000 August 14, 1987 •r ITY F 1: E.)i �� iu ! it TAG17 i.93.,` '). Environmental Review Committee City of RentonBUILDING /ZONING D PE 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, .WA 98055 Dear Sirs : Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the determination of nonsignificance for the filling and grading of 3 . 88 acres by Stoneway Concrete and the City of Renton (ECF-005-87) . We reviewed the environmental checklist and have the following comments. Au ined edf oir n thhe phoklcits. t , Th e shpreploisneed permit t wmluls t bec omrep- ly with the goals and standards of the local shoreline master program. If you have any questions, please call Ms . Terra Prodan of the Shorelands Program at (206) 459-6789. Sincerely, 6 - - Caf/L�CX-- Barbara J. itchie Environmental Review Section BJR: cc: Linda Rankin, Shorelands y } - DS/Dskl " ECF00587 CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO. : ECF-005-87 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SP-005-87, SM-002-87 . DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for special permit to allow the filling and grading on 3 .88 acres of property with approximately 53,000 cubic yards of material in order to bring the property to grade with the remainder of the site, and substantial shorelines development permit to allow said fill and grading within 200 feet of Cedar River. PROPONENT: Stoneway Concrete and City of Renton Parks and Recreation Department LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Directly north of Cedar River at 1915 Maple Valley Highway. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43 .21C.030 (2) (c) . This decision was made after review of an expanded environmental checklist and preliminary site plan, on file with the lead agency. Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-2822 (D) Renton Municipal Code (see attached sheet) . These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340. The lead agency will not act on this proposal for fifteen (15) days from August 3, 1987. Any interested party may submit written comments which must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. , August 17, 1987, in order to be considered. This Determination may be appealed by 5:00 p.m. on August 17, 1987. Any appeal must be submitted in writting stating clearly reasons for revising the Determination and must be accompanied by a non-refundable $75. 00 filing fee. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 235-2500 DATE OF DECISION: July 29, 1987 EFFECTIVE DATE: August 3, 1987 • O)1( Ro ald G. Nelson Si4,:r"1 . Springer Building and, Zoning Director Poli. Deve 4.ment Director Richard C. 4(Qil Public Wo s Director DS/Dskl StonwyMM CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE MITIGATION MEASURES ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO. : ECF-005-87 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SP-005-87, SM-002-87 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for special permit to allow the filling and grading on 3.88 acres of property with approximately 53,000 cubic yards of material in order to bring the property to grade with the remainder of the site, and substantial shorelines development permit to allow said fill and grading within 200 feet of Cedar River. PROPONENT: Stoneway Concrete and City of Renton Parks and Recreation Department LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: CONDITIONS: 1. Haul routes and hours of operation to be approved by Public Works, Policy Development, Parks and Recreation, and the State Department of Transportation. 2. All fill materials to be certified as to their cleanliness by a certified professional engineer. 3. Hours of filling are to be coordinated with the Parks and Recreation Department. 4. A landscape/erosion buffer easement having a minimum width of 30 feet from the mean water level of the Cedar River and a northern setback distance determined by the drip line of existing trees along the river's edge and running the full width of the western portion of the site from the western boundary &. (abutting Cedar River Park) east to the existing sedimentation pond is to be provided to visually screen the industrial uses on the site from recreational uses along the Cedar River as well as to create an erosion buffer from Cedar River flooding; 5. Because of the fragile natural environment of the landscape buffer, fill materials shall be retained by earthern- berms beginning behind the landscape buffer; NOTE: If ecology blocks are used as a retention device for the proposed fill, they shall be bermed along their river side and shall be setback a minimum distance of 15 N City of Renton . Determination of Non-Significance Mitigation Measures Page 2 feet from the landscaped buffer easement identified in item 4. above. 6. All bermed areas shall be landscaped with evergreen trees and plants as well as soil retained evergreen ground cover; and 7. Additional conifer and evergreen shrubbery shall be planted in the landscape/erosion buffer easement for erosion control as well as to create an aesthetic visual screen of heavy industrial uses on the site. r//> ,, i,, j ,:, i.: 1,• .':,4. ':::',',::.,:4 -'','',1;, 1111 • EN ' , . . ,, i L . raj. � , ,,- ..L., DEC ..; J:t • r'N.' A•.l A Y APPLICATION NO. ECF-005-87, SP-005-87, SM-002-87 APPLICANT STONEWAY CONCRETE & CITY OF RENTON PARKS & RECREATION DEPT. eROPOSED 4CITAMMTAK7 E,EMeLcrIERDTS. 1.8FFNIATEfliwqr,� ON .88 ACRES ORDER TO BRING PROPERTY TO GRADE WITH REMAINNG SITE & NTIAL SHORELINE PERMIT TO ALLOW FILL & GRADE WITHIN 200 ,FT, OF CEDAR RIVER. GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS DIRECTLY NORTH OF CEDAR RIVER AT 1915 MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (E.R.C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES cer.DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT i WILL � WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 1.5 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST. BE RECEIVED BY - AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., ` •AUGUSI 1/, 1987 FOR FURTHER 'INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE .--i- WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION. 1 , OF �; 0: ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Z o RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR � 0 �� MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 • 235-2540 Ao94TFD SEPt 'z�P BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR July 31, 1987 Washington State Dept of Ecology Environmental Review Section Mail Stop PB-11 Olympia, WA 98504 Gentlemen: Transmitted herewith are copies of the Determination .of Non-Significance°' (Mitigated) along with the Environmental Checklist for the following projects: 1. Stoneway Concrete and City of Renton Parks and Recreatibn,Dept. File nos ECF 055-87, SP 005-87, SM 002-87 (revised) 2. Boeing Commercial Airplane Company File nos ECF 023-87, CU.028-87 If you have any questions, please call 235-2540 r - ' Dona- • Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator enclosures DE:db r•s OF R4,, A. �a BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON — DIRECTOR toiL 0 " MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 O 235-2540 Ao9�7.FD SEP'�E� Q BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR July 31, 1987 Mr. Gerald W. Marbett Building & Development Division 450 King County Administration Bldg. Seattle, WA 98104 Dear Mr. Marbett: Transmitted herewith are copies of the Determination of Non-Significance (Mitigated) for the following projects: 1: Stoneway Concrete and City of Renton Parks and Recreation Dept. File nos ECF 055-87,. SP 005-87, SM 002-87 (revised) 2. Boeing Commercial. Airplane Company File nos ECF 023-87, CU 028-87 If you have any questions, please call 235-2540. Inc ly, Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator . enclosures DE:db AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION AudreyDeJoie beingfirst dulysworn on oathstates ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE , RENTON,WASHINGTON that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Declaration of NON- SIGNIFICANCE for the following project(s) VALLEY DAILY NEWS with additional conditions imposed as miti- gating measures under their authority of • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition Section 4-2822(D) of the Renton Municipal Code: Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week. That said newspapers STONEWAY CONCRETE AND CITY OF RENTON PARKS AND RECREATION are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six DEPARTMENT months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published Application for special permit to allow the filling and grading on 3.88 acres of property in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King with approximately 53,000 cubic yards of County,Washington.The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal material in order to bring the property to newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for grade with remainder of the site, and sub Kingstantial shorelines development permit to County. allow said fill and grading within 200 ft. of Cedar River. Property located directly north of Cedar River at 1915 Maple Valley High- The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the Kent Edition way. File Nos.: ECF-005-87, SP-005-87, , Renton Edition X , Auburn Edition , (and not in SM-002-87. supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers Further i regarding this action is availablenfo inrmation the Building and Zoning during the below stated period.The annexed notice a Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Notice of Environmental Determination Washington, 235-2550. Any appeal of ERC action must be filed with the Renton Hear- was published on Augus t 5, 1987 R24L42 ing Examiner by August 17, 1987. Published in the Valley Daily News August 5, 1987.R2442 The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $ 30.43 . Subscribed and sworn to before me is 12th day of August 19 87 a Notary lic for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, King County, Washington. t_' �° ' ; rNl-ON VDN*87 Revised 11 86 ' ' i., 1' I 1\/7 1 11 1 ' S EF-) "err F-rmf -�. A NotEnvDet/Dskl Pub8387 NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Declaration of NON-SIGNIFICANCE for the following project(s) with additional conditions imposed as mitigating measures under their authority of Section 4-2822 (D) of the Renton Municipal Code: STONEWAY , CONCRETE_ AND CITY OF RENTON PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT Application for special permit to allow the filling and grading on 3.88 acres of property with approximately 53,000 cubic yards of material in order to bring the property to grade with the remainder of the site, and substantial shorelines development permit to allow said fill and grading within 200 ft. of Cedar River. Property located directly north of Cedar River at 1915 Maple Valley Highway. File Nos. : ECF-005-87, SP-005-87, SM-002-87. Further information regarding this action is available in the Building and Zoning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. Any appeal of ERC action must be filed with the Renton Hearing Examiner by August 17, 1987. PUBLISHED: August 3, 1987 I e$ ` CITY OF RENTON ) ' BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director July 30, 1987 Jane Ryan Koler Casey, Pruzan & Kovarik 18th Floor,, Pacific Building Seattle, Washington 98104 RE: Stoneway Concrete, Inc. Special Permit SP-005-87 Environmental Determination, ECF-005-87 Dear Ms. Koler: The Environmental Review Committee met yesterday and reconsidered its earlier environmental determination for this project. The Committee upheld its earlier decision to issue a Determination of Non-significance - Mitigated but agreed to revise Item 4. and Item 5. of its earlier conditions of mitigation for this project. Specifically, Item 4. stated that the north river bank was to be rip-rapped to the 100-year flood plain level, and Item 5. stated that a 15-foot maintenance/access easement parallel to the Cedar River be granted to the. City which will function as an eventual public access to both the Cedar River Park and residential areas to the east. The Committee after careful review believes that it will be very important to screen future developments on the east (trail side) of the Cedar River from the noise, and visually uninviting appearance of the batch plant and loading, storage and parking area to the •west. In order to achieve this the Committee felt that all existing landscaping along the river bank of that portion of the site under consideration should be retained, and that in addition, a minimum landscape strip of dense evergreen shrubs and trees at least 35 feet deep should be provided between the proposed fill area and the river's edge. The Environmental Review Committee also recommended against restraining the new fill area with stacked ecology blocks. They felt that it would be preferable to extend the existing river bank's slope back to the point where it intercepts the new fill material. In order to minimize erosion the top of this fill would be covered with dense soil retaining ground cover or larger rocks. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 r Jane Ryan Koler Casey, Pruzan & Kovarik 'July 30, 1987 Page 2 In addition, the Committee felt that if the large concrete "ecology" blocks were to be used as retaining devices for the fill area they should be bermed (outside of the landscape/erosion buffer easement zone) and heavily landscaped to blend in better with the natural appearance of the buffer itself. Attached is a copy of the Committee's revised determination. Since this is a final determination, there is no comment period. You may, however, appeal this to the City's Land Use Hearing Examiner within fourteen days. Such an appeal would be filed in writing with the Hearing Examiner no later than August 14, 1987. If you have any questions, please give me a call. I have also enclosed your July 6, 1987, Appeal Letter and check for $75.00 which we did not have to use. CD nvir a tal eview Committee, d . r Donald K. Eric son, AICP Zoning Administrator DE: encl: �F R4,4,0,1 %y ® ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR z•� MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 • 235-2540 "?1,. GIA SEPT BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR MEMORANDUM DATE: July 17, 1987 TO: File FROM: Jerry Lind SUBJECT: Stoneway Concrete, 1915 Maple Valley Highway I today made an inspection at the above referenced firm, Stoneway Concrete. Specifically, I checked out the area along the shoreline of the Cedar River of new construction that has occurred without Stoneway Concrete having obtained either a shoreline management permit or a building permit. Directly west of their containment pond is now constructed a concrete wall made of "ecology blocks" approximately 160 feet long and 6 feet in height. The wall is built approximately 6 feet away from the edge of the Cedar River. The structure was designed as a storage area divided into three bins which hold assorted gravel materials. Also, west of this bin area is new rip rap placed into the river along the bank for a 6, inch pipe outlet. This also has not been approved. Finally, in the southwest corner of the site fill has been recently placed in the area, fortunately, not within the dripline of the existing trees. It appears that between 1-2 feet of fill has been placed in this area which came from existing stockpiles on the site. The fill is composed of earth, rock, concrete chunks and asphalt. For the record, I have also taken several photographs of the Stoneway site today. JFL:csb:dskl MemStone • To: $ . DON' Y2.6 3 4.:Ir.4 Sp-oo5-81 ANDREA BEATTY RINIKER Director Ht/889 a1° STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Mail Stop PV-11 • Olympia, Washington 98504-8711 • (206) 459-6000 July 10, 1987 i - ,1 Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South ` 'w R.' : / '':,fN DF.PT. Renton, WA 98055 Dear Committee Members : Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the determination of nonsignificance for the filling and grading project for Stoneway Concrete and Renton Parks and Recreation Department (Checklist ECF-005-87) . We reviewed the environmental check- list and have the following comments. A shoreline substantial development permit should be applied for. The application should include a site plan that shows all proposed structures and all other project components . The proposed project must comply with the goals and standards of the local shoreline master program. If you have any questions, please call Ms. Terra Prodan of the Shorelands Program at (206) 459-6789. Sincerely, _guest / O /4— Donald J. ales Environmental Review Section DJB: cc: Terra Prodan Linda Rankin EVE® J U L 1 4 19871 ENGINEERING DEPT. " ›.3 F Q.) 0 Co BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT - o RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR 09 �� MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 09gr�D SEPSE�.�P BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR MEMORANDUM DATE: July 10, 1987 TO: File FROM: Don Erickson SUBJECT: STONEWAY CONCRETE: APPLICATION FOR AN EXEMPTION FROM THE SHORELINE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT REQUIREMENTS TO CONSTRUCT A TEMPORARY SECURITY FENCE Larry Springer and I visited Stoneway's site to meet with Dick Pedrick of Goldsmith & Associates, Inc. Engineers to discuss Merlino"s current grade and fill (special permit) and shoreline application. I was dismayed that the temporary fence that we approved on June 27, 1987 was not yet installed since the applicant's attorney and insurer had stated that an emergency, life threatening situation existed from children venturing into the Stoneway truck storage area and climbing on the trucks. Ms. Koler stated that a week or so before, a child was nearly hit by one of the trucks and went so far as to suggest that the City could be liable if someone was injured because they had "told us of the problem" . Mr. Pedrick requested of me whether they could install the fence as part of the yet to be approved retaining wall for the filling they want to do with the understanding that they would remove the retaining wall if they did not get their shoreline permit. I stated that the ecology block wall he was speaking of was significant, exceeded the $2 ,500 exemption limit under the State Shorelines Program and therefore, could not be approved. I also reiterated my concerns about the temporary fence not yet having been installed. 04tid DKE:plp:p4-012 CITY OF RENTON 'k4 • BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT �s Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director July 10, 1987 Richard Pedrick, P.E. Htigh Goldsmith & Associates, Inc. 501 Lyon Building Seattle, Wa. 98104 RE: STONEWAY CONCRETE'S EXEMPTIONS TO INSTALL A TEMPORARY SECURITY FENCE Dear Mr. Pedrick: Attached is a copy of my letter of June 26th, 1987 to Ms. Koler granting Stoneway an exemption under the City's Shoreline Master Program to construct a temporary six (6) foot high security fence (7 ' with barbed wire) to keep children away from heavy parked and moving equipment on the site. Since this request was presented to us as an emergency situation where life safety was a major consideration, this Department went out of its way to expedite the issuance of this exemption. Ms. Koler indicated that Stoneway wanted to install the fence immediately and we concurred with this based upon her statements and those of Stoneway's insurer. If the above fence is not installed immediately, we will be required to revoke this exemption. Regarding the placement of ecology blocks prior to the issuance of a development permit, the . Department of Ecology has notified us that even temporary work such as preloading, constitutes a development. Anything exceeding a fair market value over $2,500 requires a shoreline substantial development permit under the regulations of Renton's Shoreline Management Program and 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 Richard Pedrick, P.E. July 10, 1987 Page 2 the Shoreline Management Act and said permit according to the state "should address the entire project" . Therefore we are not in a position to allow even the temporary installation of the ecology block barrier. Very truly, Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE:plp:p4-011 cc: J.B.Koler Ron Nelson, Building & Zoning Director Larry Warren, City Attorney • -,, • p 00s-8 ? LAW OFFICES CASEY, PRUZAN & KOVARIK MERWIN E. CASEY 18TH FLOOR PACIFIC aUILDING CARL PRUZAN SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104 JOHN F. KOVARIK OF COUNSEL MARTIN A. GODSIL (206) 623-3577 WILLIAM J.'MORRIS PHILLIP T. HUTCHISON RICHARD A. ACARREGUI DAVID G. SHENTON W. DIRKER EHLERT GARY R. ENGLISH CM" PROVIDENCE WORLEY qEcPMICHAEL A. LARSON E-1E TON JANE RYAN KOLER (IV ED July 6, 1987 JUL 6 1987 BUILDING/ZONING SEP The Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington, 98055 Re: Comment/Petition for Reconsideration of Mitigating Measures Set Forth in the Determination of Non-Significance Dear Environmental Review Committee: We represent Stoneway Concrete, which operates a concrete batch plant at 915 Maple Valley Highway in Renton, Washington. Stoneway Concrete has applied for a grading permit which would allow it to install fill on 3.88 acres of a 13 acre site in order to bring the 3.88 acre area of the batch plant site to the same elevation as the remainder of the site. Creating a more even site will allow our client to more effectively utilize this site. It will also be necessary for our client to obtain a substantial development permit before commencing this filling activity. We request that the Environmental Review Committee recon- sider Condition 4 and Condition 5, which were imposed upon issuance of the Determination of Non-Significance on June 29, 1987. The conditions state: 4. The north river bank is to be rip-rapped to the 100-year flood plain elevation. 5. A fifteen (15) foot maintenance/access easement parallel to the Cedar River is to be granted to the City which could function as an eventual link between the Cedar River Park and residential areas to the east. • 1. Condition 5 was Improperty Imposed on this Filling Proposal. In imposing condition 5, the City did not follow relevant statutory and regulatory requirements which govern the PY OF RENTO RcED JUL 6 1987 The Environmental Review Committee July 6, 1987 BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. Page 2 City's authority to mitigate development proposals under the State Environmental Policy Act ("SEPA") . RCW 43 .21C. 060 clearly provides that mitigating measures must be imposed for the sole purpose of mitigating specific adverse environmental impacts. RCW 43 .21C. 060 states in relevant part: . . . Any governmental action may be conditioned or denied pursuant to this chapter: Provided, That such conditions or denials shall be based upon policies identified by the appropriate governmental authority and incorporated into regulations, plans, or codes which are formally designated by the agency (or appropriate legislative body, in the case of the local government) as possible bases for the exercise of authority pursuant to this chapter. Such designation shall occur at the time specified by RCW 43 .21C. 120. Such action may be conditioned only to mitigate specific adverse environmental impacts which are identified in the environmental documents prepared under this chapter. These conditions shall be stated in writing by the decision maker. Here, it does not appear that condition 5 was formulated to address a specific adverse environmental impact. Examination of the various environmental documents pertaining to this filling proposal fails to disclose any specific adverse environmental impacts which would be remedied by the imposition of such condition. It appears that the granting of a maintenance/access easement is an amenity which the City desires. However, it does not appear that it is necessary to provide a maintenance/access easement in order to address an adverse environmental impact which the City identified during the environmental review process. In formulating this condition, the City did not follow the requirements for the imposition of mitigating measures which are set forth in WAC 197-11-660. WAC 197-11-660 states in relevant part: (a) Mitigation measures or denials shall be based on policies, plans, rules, or regulations formally designated by the agency (or appropriate legisla- tive body, in the case of local government) as a / I RECE06�E6i�T®N (E IDThe Environmental Review Committee July 6, 1987 6 1 BUILDINGJUL/ZONING987 DEFT Page 3 basis for the exercise of substantive authority and in effect when the DNS or DEIS is issued. (b) Mitigation measures shall be related to specific, adverse environmental impacts clearly identified in an environmental document on the proposal and shall be stated in writing by the decision maker. The decision maker shall cite the agency SEPA policy that is the basis of any condition or denial under this chapter (for proposal of applicants) . After its decision, each agency shall make available to the public a document that states the decision. The document shall state the mitigation measures, if any, that will be implemented as part of the decision, including any monitoring of environmental impacts. Such a document may be the license itself, or may be combined with other agency documents, or may reference relevant portions of environmental documents. In the present case, the City has failed to comply with the above recited requirements. The City has neither specified what adverse environmental impact condition 5 was formulated in order to address nor indicated which SEPA policy is the basis for condition 5. 2. Condition 4 Needs to be Clarified. . We would also like the City to reconsider condition 4. Condition 4 requires Stoneway Concrete to install rip-rapping on the north river bank. Our client seeks clarification of condition 4. It is unclear to our client whether the City wishes for Stoneway to rip-rap the existing slope bank or the fill slope which would be created when Stoneway finishes its filling activity. Clarification of this condition is accordingly necessary. This condition was presumably imposed in order to stabilize the slope of the river bank. It appears that the objective of stabilizing the slope could be obtained by the installation of a combination of landscaping and rip-rapping. It appears that this method of slope stabilization would be preferable because it would also serve to enhance the shoreline of the Cedar River. In order to stabilize the slope of the river bank, our client proposes the installation of a greenbelt area composed of evergreens which would commence at the western boundary of its property and extend approximately 425 feet. The greenbelt area C1TY OF 'RE NTON V ED R E JUL 6 1987 The Environmental Review Committee July 6, 1987 Page 4 BUILDING 1 ZONING DEPT. would begin at the existing toe of the slope, which is located approximately 35 feet from the ordinary high water mark. The greenbelt area would extend toward the water and would blend in with existing vegetation. Then, our client would install rip-rap which would extend from the toe of the slope upland to the top of the slope created by the new fill. If this Committee should decide to utilize the above-described method of slope stabilization, our client would like to enter into an agreement with the City upon providing • such a greenbelt area. The agreement would specify that in reviewing our clients application for a Substantial Development Permit, the City recognized that (1) provision of the green belt area enhanced the shoreline of the Cedar River in accord with policies which are articulated in the Renton Shoreline Master Program and (2) provision of the green belt area furthers public interest policies articulated in the Renton Shoreline Master Program. The agreement also would specify that this greenbelt area would be considered in meeting future development requirements imposed in connection with any future developments at this site. The agreement would provide that the City would consider the greenbelt area in (1) computing area requirements and setback requirements for any future developments and (2) imposing conditions required by the Renton Shoreline Master Program and SEPA on any future developments which are constructed at this site. Our client wishes to have an agreement in place which reflects the above-described conditions because this is land extremely valuable for commercial property. If our client installs such a greenbelt area, our client will lose a portion of that property and will incur substantial expense in order to install evergreen landscaping in this area. Therefore, our client wishes to be protected against the possibility of having to dedicate additional greenbelt area to the City, in the same area of the property, at a later date in connection with a future development proposal. For the foregoing reasons we respectfully request that the City reconsider the imposition of the above-described mitigation measures. Very truly yours, CASEY, PRUZAN & OVARIK Qt J e Ryan Koler mlp y\y-F • •• CITY OF RENTON WOMB DAL `" BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director June 26, 1987 Jane Bryan Koler Casey, Runzan & Kovarik 18th Floor Pacific Building Seattle, Wa. 98104 RE: STONEWAY CONCRETE'S APPLICATION FOR AN EXEMPTION FROM THE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT REQUIREMENTS OF THE RENTON SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM TO CONSTRUCT A TEMPORARY SECURITY FENCE. Dear Jane: This office has reviewed your request of June 22, 1987 for a Shoreline exemption under Renton's Shoreline Master Programs to erect a temporary cyclone type fence along Stoneway's west property line (adjacent to Cedar River Park) as well as parallel to (but not setback from) the Cedar River along Stoneway's southern boundary as a deterrent to children who "wander over to the site". We have also reviewed Mr. Gregory Walsh's letter of June 24, 1987 in which he states that failure of Stoneway to install such a security fence in the near future would prevent them (Stoneway's insurance broker) from obtaining liability insurance on the property. Because of the apparent emergency nature of this request (Section 2-03 . 01.E. allows for emergency construction "necessary to protect property from damage by the elements") . We are making an administrative determination that the intent of this section would be to cover any emergency situation where "time is of the essence" . Because it has been stated by the applicant that there is a high likelihood that serious injuries could result without a security fence along the park's eastern boundary and the property's southern edge (where children now access the site up the river's bank) this office believes such an exemption is warranted subject to the following conditions: 1. Said six (6) foot chain link fence shall be erected no closer than fifty (50) feet to the mean high-water line of the adjacent Cedar River; 2. If barbed wire is used, it only be located at the top of said fence, above the six foot chain link portion, not exceeding a maximum height of seven (7) feet; 3. That fence posts shall consist of iron or steel pipe driven into the ground; and 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 1 Jane Bryan Koler June 26, 1987 Page 2 4. This exemption shall be for a period of three (3) months only, commencing on June 29, 1987 after which the applicant shall remove said fence. Note: Applicant has stated that said problem of children intruding on the site is prevalent during the summer months when the school children are out. If you have any questions please contact us immediately. (-;\:77:11( / )ii Dona dam. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE:plp:p4-009 DS/Dskl StonwyMM CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE MITIGATION MEASURES ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO. : ECF-005-87 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SP-005-87, SM-002-87 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for special permit to allow the filling and grading on 3.88 acres of property with approximately • 53, 000 cubic yards of material in order to bring the property to grade with the remainder of the site, and substantial shorelines development permit to allow said fill and grading within 200 feet of Cedar River. PROPONENT: Stoneway Concrete and City of Renton Parks and Recreation Department LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: CONDITIONS: 1. Haul routes and hours of operation to be approved by Public Works, Policy Development, Parks and Recreation, and the State Department of Transportation. 2 . All fill materials to be certified as to their cleanliness by a certified professional engineer. 3. Hours of filling are to be coordinated with the Parks and Recreation Department. 4. The north river bank is to be rip- rapped to the 100-year flood plain elevation. 5. A fifteen (15) foot maintenance/ access easement parallel to the Cedar river is to be granted to the City which could function as an eventual link between the Cedar River Park and residential areas to the east. 6. Additional conifers and evergreen shrubbery should be added to buffer the adjacent Cedar River Park. 1 g. DS,f Dsk1 ECF00587 CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO. : ECF-005-87 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SP-005-87, SM-002-87 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for special permit to allow the filling and grading on 3.88 acres of property with approximately 53, 000 cubic yards of material in order to bring the property to grade with the remainder of the site, and substantial shorelines development permit to allow said fill and grading within 200 feet of Cedar River. PROPONENT: StonewayConcrete and City of Renton Parks and Recreation Department LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Directly north of Cedar River at 1915 Maple Valley Highway. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2) (c) . This decision was made after review of an expanded environmental checklist and preliminary site plan, on file with the lead agency. Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-2822 (D) Renton Municipal Code (see attached sheet) . These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340. The lead agency will not act on this proposal for fifteen (15) days from June 25, 1987. Any interested party may submit written com ents which must be submitted by 5: 00 p.m. , July 10th in order to be considered. This Determination may be appealed by 5:00 p.m. on July. 10th. Any appeal must be submitted in writting stating clearly reasons for revising the Determination and must be accompanied by a non-refundable $75.00 filing fee. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 235-2500 DATE OF DECISION: June 10, 1987 EFFECTIVE DATE: June 26, 1987 • 1/ onald G. Nelson L er y R. Sp nt ger Building and Zoning Director Policy 7-ve .ment Director Ridhard . Houghton Public W rks Director 8 • sp-co e.-)-6-1 Public Notice Public Notice NOTICE OF acres of property from L-1 to B-1. Property ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION located between Park Avenue N. and Gar- ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE den Avenue N. between North 5th and 6th RENTON,WASHINGTON Streets,File Nos.:ECF-013-87,R-016-87. The Environmental Review Committee SUNSET PROFESSIONAL CENTER: (ERC)has issued a Declaration of Non-Sig- Application for site plan approval to allow niticance Mitigated for the following prof- construction of a three-story, 26,010 sq. ft. ects: professional and general office building to AFFIDAVIT OF PUB O , ( ME - Property WIHENDERSND DIVISIONN N2)HOMES: ER Se i ttalSUM applicRa- locatedbe northlocatedon of a N.E.1.44 Sunsetacre Bs and east tion for preliminary plat approval to allow a of Anacortes Ave. N.E., File Nos.: ECF- 73 lot subdivi�':,1 on 17.1 acres of property 014-87,SA-018-87. Audrey DeJoio ,being fi zoned R-1, Residential Single Family. for PUBLIC STORAGE, INC.:Application for that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the Division 2. Property located approximately conditional use permit to build a mini-stor- at the 2200-2300 block of Duvall Avenue age warehouse on 2,388 acres and applica- N.E.File Nos.:ECF-020-87,PP-025-87. lion for short plat of two (2) lots. Property BUCHAN BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION located at N.W. quadrant of Edmonds Ave- VALLEY DAILN (RAINIER AUTO CENTER): Application for nue N.E. and Sunset Blvd. N.E., File Nos.: site plan approval to allow the construction ECF-019-87,CU-021-87, SH PL-022-87. • • Kent Edition • Renton Edition of an auto service center comprised of two STONEWAY CONCRETE AND CITY OF buildings having 9,720 sq.ft.on a 0.74 acre RENTON PARKS AND RECREATION Daily newspapers published six (6) times a site. Property located on the west side of DEPARTMENT: Application for special per- Rainier Ave. North at 371 Rainier Ave. • mit to allow the filling and grading on 3.88 are legal newspapers and are now and ha North.File Nos.:ECF-011-87,SA-014.87. acres of property with approximately 53,000 months prior to the date of publication refer RON LIEN: Application for conditional cubic yards of material in order to bring the use permit to allow a three story office property to grade with the remainder of hte in the English language continually as doll• addition having approximately 2,160 sq. ft. site, and substantial shorelines develop- County,Washington.The Valley Daily News A substantial shoreline development permit ment permit to allow said fill and grading newspaper by order of the Superior Court of is also required as said development is within 200 tt. of Cedar River, File Nos.: within 200 feet of the Cedar River. Property ECF-005-87,SP-005087,SM-002-87. King County. located west of the Cedar River at 289 East EXIT 7: Application for a three lot short Perimeter Road. File Nos.: ECF-018-87, plat of 3.6 acres of commercially zoned CU-020-87,SM-003-87. property and an application for site plan The notice in the exact form attached,was pt PUBLIC STORAGE PROPERTIES VIII approval to allow the construction of a , Renton Edition _ x _, Auburn LTD. AND KOHL EXCAVATING INC. shopping center consisting of three build- PROFIT SHARING PLAN: Application to ings with a total of 45,000 square feet of supplement form) which was regularly diS, rezone approximately 3.53 acres of proper- retail'space. Property located east of I-405, during the below stated period.The annexed l ty from G-1 to B-1 for future commercial south of the Exit 7 off ramp of 1-405,west of use. Property located on the west side of Lincoln Avenue N.E. and north of N. 44th Notice of Lnvironmontol. i)ete Rainier Ave. N.at the 800 to 900 block.File Street. File Nos.: ECF-009-87, SH PL-011- Nos.ECF-086-86, R-102-86. 87,SA-012-87. was published on ,i un e 26, 1987 KOHL EXCAVATING INC. PROFIT This decision will be finalized in 15 days. SHARING PLAN: Application to rezone Written comments received after 5:00 p.m., approximately 2.60 acres of property from July 10, 1987, will not be considered. A R-2 to B-1 for future commercial use. Prop- fourteen (14) day appeal period will corn- erty located between 87th Avenue South to mence following the finalization of DNS. The full amount of the fee charged for said : west and Rainier Ave. south to the east in The mitigation measures imposed by the the 800-850 block. File Nos.: ECF-087-86, City of Renton's Environmental Review sum of $T;_;, a 0 R-103-86. Committee are available at the Building and THE POLYGON CORPORATION (SUN- Zoning Department, Municipal Building, i POINTE CONDOMINIUMS): Application for Renton,Washington. Phone 235-2540. final planned unit development for Phrase II The Determination may be appealed by ./ - ' of the Sunpointe Condominiums to allow 5:00 p.m. on July 10, 1987. Any appeal 256 multi-family units on approximately must be submitted in writing stating clearly 13.29 acres of property. Property located at reasons for revising the Determination and Stevens Avenue S.W. and S.W. 5th Street. must be accompanied by a non refundable Subscribed and sworn to before me this o Ot . File Nos.:ECF-033-87,FPUD-037-87. $75.00 filing fee. E & H PROPERTIES(GARDEN PLAZA): Published in the Valley Daily News June Application to rezone approximately 3.3 26, 1987. R2370 /1G ,Z Nota y Public for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, King County, Washington. VON#87 Rev,sed 11 86 1 NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL1DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Declaration of Non-Significance Mitigated for the following projects: HENDERSON HOMES, INC. (SUMMERWIND DIVISION #2) : Resubmittal application for preliminary plat approval to allow a 73 lot subdivision on 17.1 acres of property zoned R-1, Residential Single Family, for Division 2. Property located approximately at the 2200-2300 block of Duvall Avenue N.E. File Nos. : ECF-020-87,PP-025-87. BUCHAN BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION (RAINIER AUTO CENTER) : Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of an auto service center comprised of two buildings having 9,720 sq. ft. on a 0.74 acre site. Property located on the west side of Rainier Ave. North at 371 Rainier Ave. North. File Nos. : ECF-011-87,SA-014- 87. RON LIEN: Application for conditional use permit to allow a three story office addition having approximately 2,160 sq. ft. A substantial shoreline development permit is also required as said development is within 200 feet of the Cedar River. Property locaterl, west of the Cedar River at 289 East Perimeter Road. File Nos. : ECF-018-87,CU-020- 87,SM-003-87. PUBLIC STORAGE PROPERTIES VIII LTD. AND KOHL EXCAVATING INC. PROFIT SHARING PLAN: Application to rezone approximately 3.53 acres of property from G 1 to B-1 for future commercial use. Property located on the west side of Rainier Ave. N. at the 800 to 900 block. File Nos. ECF-086-86,R-102-86. KOHL EXCAVATING INC. PROFIT SHARING PLAN: Application to rezone approximately 2.60 acres of property from R-2 Ito B-1 for future commercial use. Property located between 87th Avenue South to the west and Rainier Ave. South to the east in the 800-850 block. File Nos. : ECF-087-86,R-103-86. THE POLYGON CORPORATION (SUNPOINTE CONDOMINIUMS) : Application for final planned unit development for Phase II of the Sunpointe Condominiums to allow 256 multi- family units on approximately 13.29 acres of property. Property located at Stevens Avenue S.W. and S.W. 5th Street. File Nos. :, ECF-033-87,FPUD-037-87. E&H PROPERTIES (GARDEN PLAZA) : Application to rezone approximately 3.3 acres of property from L-1 to B-1 Property located between Park Avenue N. and Garden Avenue N. between North 5th and 6th Streets, File Nos. : ECF-013- 87,R-016-87. SUNSET PROFESSIONAL CENTER: Application for site plan approval to allow construction of a three-story, 26, 010 sq. ft. professional and general office building to be located on a 1.44 acre site. Property located north of N.E. -Sunset Blvd. and east of Anacortes Ave. N.E. , File Nos. : ECF-014-87,SA-018-87. PUBLIC STORAGE, INC. : Application for conditional use permit to build a mini- storage warehouse on 2,388 acres and application for short plat of two (2) lots. Property located at N.W. quadrant of Edmonds Avenue N.E. and. Sunset Blvd. N.E. , File Nos. : ECF-019O87rCU-021-87,aH PL-022-87. STONEWAY CONCRETE AND CITY OF RENTON PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT: Application for special permit to allow the filling and grading on 3.88 acres of property with approximately 53,000 cubic yards of material in order to bring the property to grade with the remainder of the site, and substantial shorelines developmdnt permit to allow said • fill and grading within 200 ft. of Cedar River, File Nos. : ECF-005"87,SP-005-87,SM-002-87. EXIT 7: Application for a three lot short plat of 3.6 acres of commercially zoned property and an application for site plan approval to allow the construction of a shopping center consisting of three buildings with a total of 45,000 square feet of retail space. Property located east of 1-405, south of the Exit 7 off ramp of I-405, west of Lincoln Avenue N.E. and north of N. 44th Street. File Nos : ECF-009-87,SH PL-011-87,SA-012-87. This decision will be finalized in 15 days. Written comments received after 5:00 p.m. , July • 10, 1987, will not be considered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period will commence following the finalization of DNS. The mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Building and Zoning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington. Phone 235-2540. The Determination may be appealed by 5:00 p.m. on July 10, 1987. Any appeal must be submitted in writing stating clearly reasons for revising the Determination and must be accompanied by a non refundable $75.00 filing fee. PUBLISHED: June 26, 1987 • k . NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION The En i onOmen al ReviewON Committee (ERC) has issued a declaration of NON- SIGNIFICANCE for the following projects Audrey De Jo ie being first duly sworn on oath states with additional conditions imposed as miti- ' gating measures under their authority of that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the Section 4-2822(D) of the Renton Municipal Code: SUNSET PROFESSIONAL CENTER for site planapproval to allow 7' VALLEY DAILY NEWS 'construction of a tree-story, 26,010 sq. ft. 0 Kent Edition 0 Renton Edition ® Auburn Edition professional and general office ' be located on a 1.44 acres site. Property building to Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week.That said newspapers located north of N.E. Sunset Blvd.and east ri are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six of Anacortes Ave. N.E., File Nos.: ECF- o14-87,SA-018-87. AND CITY OF ' months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King R NT OON WAy PARKS AND ERECREATION County,Washington.The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal DEPARTMENT newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for Application for special permit to allow the g filling and grading on 3.88 acres of property King County. with approximately 53,000 cubic yards of material in order to bring the property to • grade with the remainder of the site, an,' 1 The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the Kent Edition substantial shorelines development permit Renton Edition x , Auburn Edition , (and not in to allow said fill and grading within 200 ft. of Cedar River, File Nos.: ECF-005-87, SP- supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers 005-87,SM-002-87. during the below stated period.The annexed notice a EXIT 7 Application for a three lot short plat of Notice of Environmental Determination 3.6 acres of commercially zoned property and an application for site plan approval to was published on June 1 7, 1 98 7 R2 34 5 • allow the construction of a shopping center consisting of three buildings with a total of I 45,000 square feet of retail space.Property located east of 1-405,south of the Exit 7 off ramp of 1-405, west of Lincoln Avenue N.E. The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the and north of N. 44th Street. File Nos.: 33 82 ECF-009-87,SHPL-011-87,SA-012.87. sum Of $ Further information regarding this action is available in the Building and Zoning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, ' Washington, 235-2550. Any appeal of ERC am/_�� c3 � �e� , action must be filed with the Renton Hear- ing Examiner by July 1, 1987. Published in the Valley Daily News June 17, 1987.R2345 Subscribed and sworn to before me this 25 thday of June 1987 ' ff',--Ce_.•7 Noty Public for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, ;.r.. `.- . King County, Washington. 1 `'• it -' -': �I �/j I � VDN a87 Revised 11/86 i 101°87 ; 1.3.1 ' / 7! N!irt:" D d_C! • • King County Building&Land Development Division CITY OF RE NTO N Parks M Planning and Resources Department E C1 E O �I� Ell 450 King County Administration Bldg. Ll i! 500 Fourth Avenue IL!! Seattle,Washington 98104 c, 1.51987 June 12, 1987 BUILDING / ZONING DEPT. Mr. Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator Building and Zoning Department City of Renton Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 RE: Stoneway Concrete & City of Renton Parks & Recreation Department Dear Mr. Erickson: • Thank you for your May 27, 1987 SEPA Notice. This is to notify you of our review of and concurrence with the mitigation listed for the subject DNS. King County is processing a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit (021-87-Sria for this project within our jurdisdiction. We look forward to working with you on this project. If you have any questions, please call Gordon Thomson at 344-7970. Sincerely, Gerald W. Marbett, In Manger Land Use Controls Section GWM:GT:tss cc: Mark Mitchell, Planner III Gordon Thomson, Planner II Rusty Moore, Planner II b s'_ State of Washington Department of Fisheries Bldg 4 Rm 2129 7600 Sand Point Way NE Seattle, Washington 98115 June 8, 1987 ;:?CITY OF RENTON S Mr. Donald K. Erickson D © E B v E Zoning Administrator Building and Zonig Department JUN - 91987 200 Mill Ave So. Renton, Washington 98055 BUILDING /zONING DEPT, RE: Stoneway Concrete proposed fill , Cedar River SP-005-87, SM-002-87 Dear Mr. Erickson: I appreciate the opportunity to comment on the above referenced project. I have reviewed the site on May 27 in company with Mr. Merlino, Mr. Padrick, and members of the City of Renton Parks , and Planning Departments. The proposed fill is quite large and in close proximity to the Cedar River, the major salmon and trout producer in the Lake Washington watershed . ' There is potential for serious runoff and siltation problems in the river as a result of this project. Siltation is a major cause of salmon egg mortality. '. Erosion and drainage controls should be part of this review package. Part of the reason for the SEPA process is to allow public review of proposed developments. The current proposal is a speculative fill . SEPA review is to consider the uses of the site after fill is applied ,as well as just the filling operation itself. The proponent should provide this information as part of the current review document. No reason to place a fill and make the land more attractive for a use that the City, or others , may not want or accept. The toe of the proposed fill should encroach no closer than 50 feet from the high water mark of the river. The existing woodlands should remain unaltered . The existing fill should be pulled back to this 50 foot minimum 01 line. The face of the fill slope should be at a 2:1 slope and heavily vegetated to native species such as willow, cottonwood, red -twig dogwood, wild rose, and ninebark. They will provide stability to the fill slope, and , provide better wildlife use than rockery. There appears to have been recent work by the proponent along the river. This includes adding to the height of the concrete block wall at the detention pond, adding concrete at the riverside base of another wall , and installing rockery at a bank washout site. I have required that the rockery be relaid and planted. Does the City require permits of such work? M. N If there are any questions concerning my comments, please contact me at 545-6582. Sincerely,- Kurt Buchanan Regional Habitat Manager cc : WDF-Olympia D. Padrick-Goldsmith Assoc. N oT ICE ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION • APPLICATION NO. ECF-005-87, SP-005-87, SM-002-87 APPLICANT STONEWAY "CONCRETE & CITY OF RENTON PARKS & RECREATION DEPT. PROPOSED ACTION APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT TO ALLOW THE FILL & GRADING ON 3.88 ACRES OF PROPERTY WITH APPROX. 53 O00 CU. YDS, OF MATERIAI TO BRING THE PROPERTY TO GRADE WITH THE REST OF THE SITE & A SUBSTANTIAL SHORELINES DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FOR WORKING WITHIN 200 FT. OF CEDAR RIVER. GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS DIRECTLY NORTH OF CEDAR RIVER, 1915 MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (E.R.C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES OES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEME WILL ►, WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY • AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., JUNE 29, 1987 . FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT AT 235-2550. DO NOT• REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION. • i4 PUB61587 Dskl NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a declaration of NON-SIGNIFICANCE for the following projects with additional conditions imposed as mitigating measures under their authority of Section 4-2822 (D) of the Renton Municipal Code: SUNSET PROFESSIONAL CENTER Application for site plan approval to allow construction of a three-story, 26,010 sq. ft. professional and general office building to be located on a 1.44 acre site. Property located north of N.E. Sunset Blvd. and east of Anacortes Ave. N.E. , File Nos. : ECF-014-87, SA-018-87. PUBLIC STORAGE, INC. Application' for conditional use permit to build a mini- storage warehouse on 2.388 acres and application for short plat of two (2) lots. Property located at N.W. quadrant of Edmonds Avenue N.E. and Sunset Blvd. N.E. , File Nos. : ECF- 019-87, CU-021-87, SH PL-022-87. STONEWAY CONCRETE AND CITY OF RENTON PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT Application for special permit to allow the filling and grading on 3.88 acres of property with approximately 53,000 cubic yards of material in order to bring the property to grade with the remainder of the site, and substantial shorelines development permit to allow said fill. and grading within 200 ft. of Cedar River, File Nos. : ECF-005-87, SP- 005-87, SM-002-87. EXIT 7 Application for a three lot short plat of 3. 6 acres of commercially zoned property and an application for site plan approval to allow the construction of a shopping center consisting of three buildings with a total of 45, 000 square feet of retail space. Property located east of I-405, south of the Exit 7 off ramp of I-405, west of Lincoln Avenue N.E. and north of N. 44th Street. File Nos. : ECF-009-87, SH PL-011-87, SA-012-87. Further information regarding this action is available in the Building and Zoning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. Any appeal of ERC action must be filed with the Renton Hearing Examiner by June 29, 1987. Published: June 15, 1987 NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMI- NATION AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON,WASHINGTON The Environmental Review'Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of NON- kudrey' De Joi e , being first duly sworn on oath states that SIGNIFICANCE — MITIGATED for the fol- proect(s) under the authority of the he/she is the Chief Clerk of the Renton Municipal Code. The Applicant(s) have completed a mitigation process pursu- ant to WAC 197-11-350. VALLEY NEWSPAPERS RENTON PARKSY C CAND AND ECIAT OF RENTON AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT Daily News Journal, Daily Record Chronicle, Daily Globe News Application for special permit to allow the filling and grading on 3.88 acres of prop- Daily newspapers published six(6) times a week.That said newspapers erty with approximately 53,000 cubic are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six monthsprior to the date ofpublication referred to,printed andpublished yards of material in order to bring the property to grade with the remainder of in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King the site, and substantial shorelines devel- County, Washington. Valley Newspapers have been approved as legal opment permit to allow said fill and grad- ing within 200 ft. of Cedar River. File newspapers by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for Numbers: ECF-005-87, SP-005-87, SM- King County. 002-87. EXIT 7 Application for a three lot short plat of 3.6 The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the Daily News acres of commercially zoned property and an application for site plan approval to Journal—, Daily Record Chronicle . , Daily Globe News , (and allow the construction of a shopping cen- not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its ter consisting of three buildings with a total of 45,000 square feet of retail space. subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice a Property located east of 1-405, south of the Exit 7 off ramp of 1-405, west of Lin- Notice of &nvironnental De-te-pplinstion was published coin Avenue N.E. and north of N. 44th on Miry 22, 1987 R2289 PL 01t1.87,SA 012-87 ECF-009-87, SH This decision is effective in 15 days.Writ- ten comments received after June 8, 1987 will not be considered. The mitigation mea- The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sures imposed by the City of Renton's Envi- ronmental Review Committee are available sum of $ _�_�•�' at the Building and Zoning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2540. Published in the Valley Daily News May 22, 1987.R2289 Subscribed and sworn to before me this 1s t day of June_19 . Not Public for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, CITY OF RENTON King County, Washington. I C �� Q J 0 VN#87 Revised 10/84 JUN 101987 BUILDING /ZONING DEPT. / f _ . Y, f;t rj y 4,s, fi. 'x t`i.' ,,;: 41 '. '' ter` xt. `.,.`i, ) l l f` xy { �1,'`,� �} 11 1 rw`, k, i.F y 1M s,_" i ' �, f. 1 . rY y.s( hfA` ?,1 }'r �^, ,4 fY 1 ;, . . Jw '� ,I i 44( ,t '7. , r 1 J 1�' N .'"' ' ty..• 1I '. + o'y .�t,i.3i. • ' i .. (`f 1 I 'Y T 1' 11 1Y yy ,,0 }y� f Sy`" sY it N' ` ,{ ak.! APPLICATION NO. ECF-005-87, SP-005-87, SM-002-87 APPLICANT STONEWAY CONCRETE & CITY OF RENTON PARKS & RECREATION DEPT, PROPOSED ACTION APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT TO ALLOW FILLING & GRADING ON 3,88 ACRES OF PROPERTY WITH 53 000 CU. YDS, OF MATERIAL & A SHORELINE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO ALLOW SAID FILL & GRADING WITHIN 200 FT. OF CEDAR RIVER, GENERAL LOCATION AND/o`R ADDRESS DIRECTLY NORTH OF CEDAR RIVER AT 1915 MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY 3 * STE* TO .ti+ %TgElf (INTERESTED PERSONS ry -F AN ENV R ) \i ,kiiENTAL ACTP .. N0 THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (E.R.C.) HAS DETER`=°INED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES 1:*- thOES :OT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WALL M 'ALL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM !HOT, m. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BYE °MC' 46)B4o/ AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH. THE RENTON' HEARING EXAMINER BY 5000 P.'>1 '_ 1 k?r [) . ' FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION. <,i' / I OF J ' 0 ,,:r, n. o BUf DIINO & ZONONG DEPARTMENT ,f ;, ), z RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR 9,0 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 o 235-2540 09grD SEP10# BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR May 27, 1987 Mr. Gerald W. Marbett Building & Land Development Division 450 King County Administration Building Seattle, WA 98104 Dear Mr. Marbett: Transmitted herewith are copies of the Mitigating Measures for the following projects: 1. Stoneway Concrete and City of Renton Parks and Recreation Department. File Nos.: SP-005-87, SM-002-87, ECF-005-87. 2. Exit 7, Inc. File Nos.: SH PL-011-87, SA-012-87, ECF-009-87 3. Medical Center Development Group/Health Care Development Associates (Sunset Professional Center) File No.: SA-018-87, ECF-014-87 4. Public Storage, Inc. File Nos.: CU-021-87, SH PL-022-87, ECF-019-87 5. Gerald Grieve (Food Service Brokerage Company Building) File Nos: SA-029-87, ECF-026-87 Because the Environmental Review Committee imposed specific mitigation measures rather...then issued a Determination of Significance, there is a required fifteen (15) day comment period during which comments are solicited from various of encies, jurisdictions or individuals who may have an interest in the Committee's decision. The comment period will end June 9, 1987. Following the end of the comment period, the City will issue a Final Determination unless comments received require a reevaluation of its earlier threshold determination. Following the issuance of the Final Determination, there is a required 14 day appeal period. A copy of the Final Determination will be mailed to you. , an Mr. Gerald W. Marbett Building & Land Development Division May 27, 1987 Page 2 If you have any questions, please call 235-2540. az/Jilt Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator Enclosures DE°JL°cb°2227N OF R4,1 a ,�., ... o BLOOMING : ZONONG DEPARTMENT "'' "v RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR Or--r-• [... 44 9A CO. MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 o 235-2540 0 11 0 SE °s° BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR May 28, 1987 Washington State Dept. of Ecology Environmetal Review Section Mail Stop PV-11 Olympia, WA 98504 Gentlemen: Transmitted herewith are copies of the Mitigating Measures and Environmental Checklist for the following projects: 1. Stoneway Concrete and City of Renton Parks and Recreation Department. File Nos.: SP-005-87, SM-002-87, ECF-005-87. 2. Exit 7, Inc. File Nos.: SH PL-011-87, SA-012-87, ECF-009-87 3. Medical Center Development Group/Health Care Development Associates (Sunset Professional Center) File No.: SA-018-87, ECF-014-87 4. Public Storage, Inc. File Nos.: CU-021-87, SH PL-022-87, ECF-019-87 5. Gerald Grieve (Food Service Brokerage Company Building) File Nos: SA-029-87, ECF-026-87 Because the Environmental Review Committee imposed specific mitigation measures rather then issued a Determination of Significance, there is a required fifteen (15) day comment period during which comments are solicited from various agencies, jurisdictions or individuals who may have an interest in the Committee's decision. The comment period will end June 9, 1987. Following the end of the comment period, the City will issue a Final Determination unless comments received require a reevaluation of its earlier threshold determination. Following the issuance of the Final Determination, there is a required 14 day appeal period. A copy of the Final Determination will be mailed to you. Washington State Dept. of Ecology May 28, 1987 Page 2 If you have any questions, please call 235-2540. )4, y!1 7 • Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator Enclosures DE:JL:cb:2227N OF R�71, A, �c% 2,4 ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT oL '` • RONALD G. NELSON — DIRECTOR MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTORI, WASH. 98055 s 235-2540 co- 0,9gT�D SEP-r°.° BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR May 21, 1987 Richard D. Padrick, P.E. Hugh G. Goldsmith & Associates, Inc. 501 Lyon Building Seattle, WA 98104 RE: Renton Environmental Review Committee Conditions for ECF-005-87, Stoneway Concrete and City of Renton Parks & Recreation Department, Grade and Fill Permit, and SM-002-87 Shorelines Permit Applications Dear Mr. Padrick: This letter is to inform you that the Environmental Review Committee completed their review of the environmental impacts of your special development permit and substantial shoreline development permit applications on May 13, 1987 and recommended the issuance of a Determination of Non-significance with the following conditions: 1. Haul routes and hours of operation to be approved by Public Works, Policy Development, Parks and Recreation, and the State Department of Transportation: 2. All fill materials to be certified as to their cleanliness by a certified professional engineer: 3. Hours of filling are to be coordinated with the Parks and Recreation Department: 4. The north river bank is to be rip-rapped to the 100-year flood plain elevation: 5. A fifteen (15) foot maintenance/access easement parallel to the Cedar River is to be granted to the City which could function as an eventual link between the Cedar River Park and residential areas to the east. 6. Additional confers and evergreen should shrubbery be added to buffer the adjacent Cedar River Park. Because the Environmental Review Committee imposed specific mitigation measures rather than issue a, Determination of Significance, there is a required fifteen (15) day comment Richard D. Padrick, P.E. Hugh G. Goldsmith & Associates, Inc. May 21, 1987 Page 2 period during which comments are solicited from various agencies, jurisdictions or individuals who may have an interest in the Committee's decision. The comment period will end on June 1, 1987. Following the end of the comment period, the City will issue a Final Determination unless comments received require a reevaluation of its earlier threshold determination. Following the issuance of the Final Determination, there is a required 14 day appeal period. Appeals are made to the City's Hearing Examiner. We are working on your shoreline substantial development permit and will be submitting this to the Department of Ecology at the end of the 14 day appeal period. However, before submitting this, we will need from you clarification on the uses proposed in the area where the fill is occurring. This information should be sent to Jeanette Samek-McKague as soon as possible to avoid delays in processing your shoreline application. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call our office at 235-2540 and ask for myself or Jeanette Samek-McKague. For the Environmental Review mmittee. I C aAdir. Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE:csb:3817Z 2221N NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of NON-SIGNIFICANCE - MITIGATED for the following project(s) under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. The Applicant(s) have completed a mitigation process pursuant to WAC 197-11-350. STONEWAY CONCRETE AND CITY OF RENTON PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT Application for special permit to allow the filling and grading on 3.88 acres of property with approximately 53,000 cubic yards of material in order to bring the property to grade with the remainder of the site, and substantial shorelines development permit to allow said fill and grading within 200 ft. of Cedar River. File Numbers: ECF-005-87, SP-005-87, SM-002-87. EXIT 7 Application for a three lot short plat of 3.6 acres of commercially zoned property and an application for site plan approval to allow the construction of a shopping center consisting of three buildings with a total of 45,000 square feet of retail space. Property located east of I-405, south of the Exit 7 off ramp of I-405, west of Lincoln Avenue N.E. and north of N. 44th Street. File Numbers: ECF-009-87, SH PL-011-87, SA-012-87. This decision is effective in 15 days. Written comments received after June 8, 1987 will not be considered. The mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Building and Zoning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2540. PUBLISHED: May 22, 1987 • OF R.� v It PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT t$ ® z DESIGN/UTILITY ENGINEERING • 235-2631 oaeLL MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 9,o ram• 0917; SEP1E4'�P BARBARA Y. SHIN POCH ,� �-�, o s t�";c° izn- Mfi u`aj`V 6; p"3 MAYOR (It { ' MEMORANDUMr°_� HAY O 487 L DATE: May 1, 1987 mil��,iVl� i,cPT, TO: Don Erickson, Building and Zoning Administrator FROM: Bob Bergstrom, Engineering Supervisor SUBJECT: STONEWAY SPECIAL PERMIT PROPOSED FILL ALONG THE CEDAR RIVER Thank you for the chance to review the fill proposal. The Hugh Goldsmith Engineers study appears to well cover the issues on the 100-year flood plain drainage. The results of the computer model shows that the new fill will not adversely change the 100-year flood profile. Three other issues are yet to be resolved: 1. New fill bank stability - the proposed new filled bank is to be planted with bermuda grass only per page two of the April 23, 1987 Hugh Goldsmith letter. My investigation and review with the King County Conservation District and the Soil Conservation Service outlines different standards. For clay/silt/sand, 5 fps is the maximum allowed for vegetated slopes. The KCCD and SCS rule is the slopes subject to velocity in flood conditions beyond 5 fps shall be rip-rap surfaced. My recommendation is that the new north river bank be rip-rapped from waters edge to the 100-year flood elevation. 2. My other concern is that I hope Building and Zoning has routed this proposal to Washington State Department of Fisheries, Joe Robel, at 1-753-2907, or Kurt Buchanan, 1-545-6582. Fisheries is very interested in the river environment. CITY OF RENTON i fry \ -ps\I 1 1987 i i DING / ZONING DEPT. Don Erickson May 1, 1987 Page Two 3. My last item is maintenance. I would like a right-of-entry for maintenance of the river channel along the top of the slope - a 15' to 20 ' wide area suitable for heavy equipment, to operate so we may dredge the river in the future. The right-of-entry or easement, would be vested in the City, and would not commit us to maintain the Merlino river embankment. Thank you. (: ! ./2 Be.,(-ItS746 1D.5.07.REB:mf %Cb 0 Hugh G.Goldsmith &Associates, Inc. #86121 •," ("';! 23 April 1987 ' t - f. ppR 21WA,--eq" • " Renton Building & Zoning Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washingt4 98055 Attention: Mr. Donald K. Erickson, AICP II Re: Stoneway Special Permit for Grade and Fill of 53,000 cu. yds. at 1915 Maple Valley Highway and Renton letter response dated March 12, 1987 Dear Mr. Erickson, Following is our response to your comments on our referenced special permit. We will address each issue in the order presented in your March 12, 1987 letter. ] 1. Future 'plans for the site - Some consideration has been given to the potential use of the site in a very general way. That consideration has been limited to discussions of the possibility of a hotel and small retail use. Noleffort has been made to evaluate what uses are allowed un- der the code or f there is a market for a hotel/retail use. The fill 1s being placed to improve the utility of the batch plant site. Future use of the site will be identified some time in the future. 2. Measure 6 being taken to control erosion - The drawings submitted with the special permit application require construction of a filter fabric fence at the ordinary high water mark on the south side of the fill site, parallel to the Cedar River, prior to beginning work. A berm will be con- structed landward of the filter fence to further contain silt laden storm water on site. A'rs material is placed it will be sloped to to a desiltation pond on the nortp side of the berm. The settling pond will discharge to the Cedar River. These measures will minimize discharge of silt laden storm water runoff to the river. 3. Especially during flooding of the Cedar River - The landscape plan presented on the application drawings was prepared to conform to our under- standing of Parki Department and Public Works Department requirements. If the bank needs additional protection from Cedar River flood waters, we will armor the berm lin a manner similar to the bank along the Park-Cedar River interface, or wilpi other protection satisfactory to all City of Renton Departments. The river mean velocity in the area of the proposed project, • 501 Lyon Building / Seattle, Washington 98104 / (206)622-1080 consulting engineers • surveyors • planners u !i Renton Building & Zoning Department Attn: Mr. Donald Erickson 23 April 1987 Page Two i! during the 100; year storm, is about 8 fps. The velocity along the bank will be less than 8 fps. Well maintained bermuda grass on the slope will ensure a stable slope during normal flooding. 4. Source!,and type of fill materials - Source of the material is indeterminate a`t this time. Material to be used for fill will be primarily excess earth from utility construction jobs in Seattle, Renton, Kent, and King County. Some earth may also come from foundation excavation work for new buildings. The majority of earth in the region is of the Alderwood and Everett types. Alderwood soils compose about 45% of all soils in King County. Everett soils compose another 8% of all soils in King County. Both soils are of the gravelly sandy loam type. The remaining 47% of soils is com- posed of 35 other types, mostly silt loam material. It is likely that some clay silt loam type soils will be placed in the fill. If necessary the applicant will keep records on the origin of all material placed' in the fill. 5. Traffic impacts on Maple Valley Highway - The average daily traf- fic on the Maple Valley Highway at the batch plant site is about 26,600 vehicles, based on an actual Washington State Department of Transportation traffic count in 1985 of 25,065 vehicles.1 Of that total about 520 are heavy trucks, i'.e. trucks hauling gravel, concrete, and solid waste. We estimate that there will be an average of 35 trucks per day arriv- ing at the site' to dump material in the fill area. Peak traffic is esti- mated to be 50 trucks per day. Peak daily truck traffic arriving at the fill site amounts to 0.38% of the total average daily one way traffic on the Maple Valley Highway. Generally, total traffic volume impacts of 3 percent or less are not noticeable to most drivers. The proposed new temporary trucktraffic is about 6% of the existing heavy truck traffic. AC 6. Measures that will be taken to keep debris and dirt off City streets - Stoneway trucks have added side boards to their trucks to help keep material in the truck. All trucks have mud flaps which are cleaned regularly. All1loads are within legal limits . Some of the trucks arriving at the fill site will be owned by private dirt movers and will not be under the strict control of the applicant. If necessary, trucks will dump their material at the]! edge of the fill area to minimize the opportunity to track dirt out to the ;Maple Valley Highway. Trucks leaving the fill area must cross several hundred feet of con- crete pavement !before they enter SR169. Any dirt on the vehicle wheels 1 !i Phone conversation with Dave Oberg, Washington State Department of Transportation, April 6, 1987. 0 Hugh G.Goldsmith qfb &Associates,Inc. / I Renton Building & Zoning Department Attn: Mr. Donald Erickson 23 April 1987 Page Three should be cleaned off before the trucks reach SR169. As a mater of routine the concrete hhrdstands on the batch plant site are kept clean. It may be possible to give a specification sheet to all non-Stoneway truck drivers outlining minimum requirements to haul through the City of Renton and into the Stoneway site. 6. Potential adverse impacts (noise, dust, glare) on the City's ad- jacent Cedar River Park: Noise - Noise 'studies done in the vicinity of the Cedar River Park/Stoneway Batch Plant by the Washington State DOT show the following: Noise levels south of the Maple Valley Highway centerline for PM peak hour traffic: 1Distance Noise From Centerline Levels 200 feet 66 dbA 500 feet 61 dbA 1;700 feet 59 dbA 1000 feet 57 dbA Noise levels from construction equipment at specified distances is: 50 feet 100 feet 200 feet 400 feet Dump Truck 86 80 74 68 Bulldozer 80 74 68 62 Worst case noise impact on the park will occur when the construction equipment is filling the park property. From a technical perspective the Maple Valley Highway noise level is insignificant relative to the noise level of equipment constructing the fill. Consequently, the noise level shown in the chart above can be considered the worst case noise level. 11 Following completion of the fill, the Park Department might choose to reconstruct the existing berm as a visual/noise barrier of the batch plant site. Occasionally, and intermittently', equipment will move through the fill area, following completion of the fill. As previously stated, it is intended that 4he use of the newly filled area continue to be a staging area for equipment and material. Dust - Materialliplaced in the fill area will contain some water. Material placed with a water content too low to prevent dust will be watered during If 2 Phone conversation with Bruce Farar, Washington State Department of Transportation, April 8, 1987. 0 Hugh G.Goldsmith &Associates,Inc. 11 Renton Building & Zoning Department Attn: Mr. Donald Erickson 23 April 19871h Page Four II I!, placement and compaction to minimize the creation of airborne dust par- ticles. Prevailing winds are typically from the west (S.W. or N.W. ) and normally will help keep spurious dust from settling in the park. Glare - All the operations will occur during the day and no lights will be used during the filling operation. Therefore, the project will not create glare. 7. The �'i erosion problem - the erosion issue was covered in item 2 above. 8. Possible impacts on the City's well system - The Well Field Pro- tection Study prepared for the City of Renton in August, 1984 by CH2MHILL addressed several issues related to the Stoneway Batch Plant. None of the issues considered filling a portion of the site. However, the report did indicate thatI"The water table within the aquifer is generally at or near the elevation; of the water surface in the Cedar River." By filling the site about ten feet the applicant would be more than doubling the amount of cover currently provided over the aquifer in the proposed fill area. When the1'filling operation is completed the finished surface will be hard and relatively impervious to infiltration and percolation. The highly compacted fill will also act as a barrier to horizontal mitagation of pol- lutants from upstream of the fill site. The fill will also keep polluted flood water separated from the water table to a greater degree than pro- vided now. I' Since the proposed use of the fill area is continuation of the exist- ing use, the ',overall affect of placing the fill is seen to be a positive one relative to protection of the City's water supply. 9. . . .that the fill would not affect the floodway channel - Cedar River data used to generate the new FEMA maps was obtained from CH2MHILL. A new cross-selction was added to the existing data at the location of the proposed fill. The HEC 2� program was then run to obtain new flood information based on the proposedqill. A report of the flood plain analysis is attached for your review. The attachments include a map showing the location of the cross-section, ra print of a portion of the new draft FEMA map by CH2MHILL showing the study cross section location, computer print outs showing the before fill and after fill flood plain elevations, and a written report describing the analysis procedure. The conclusion reached in the study is that the fill will not affect the elevation of the 100 year flood plain. II is % 0 Hugh G.Goldsmith Cb, &Associates,Inc. • li Renton Buildings& Zoning Department Attn: Mr. Donald Erickson 23 April 1987 Page Five i; 10. Information on haul routes - Since no sources of fill material have yet been identified it is not possible to describe haul routes to the proposed fill ( site. At best, it can be stated that the material will originate at locations within the economic haul distance from the propsed project site. I Material generated outside the economic haul distance will be taken to othler approved fill sites . Potential material sources are ex- pected to bebwithin a radius of 8 to 10 miles from the fill project. Generally, dunp trucks use major highways and freeways to transport their loads. Use of local access streets is usually limited to that needed for access to the source of the material. 11. Number of trips per day - It is anticipated that there will be an average of four to five trucks per hour arriving at the site during the work day. It is possible that as many as seven trucks per hour will arrive at the site during peak times. 12. Hours of peak impact - The nature of the anticipated sources of material (i.e. utility construction projects and foundation excavations) dictate that the truck traffic will be relatively uniform during the con- struction workday, roughly 7 AM to 4 PM. The applicant requested the permit be issued for 7 AM to 8 PM Monday through Saturday to provide the flexibility to work overtime if necessary during the summer construction season. Work 'would be suspended during evening hours if it conflicted with scheduled evening activities at the Cedar River Park. If additional information is needed to enable the City to complete processing of ;the grade and fill application, please contact me. Very truly yours, HUGH G. GOLDSMITH & ASSOCIATES, INC. i Richard D. Padrick, P.E. RDP:sar Enclosures cc: Don Merlino 0 Hugh G.Goldsmith &Associates,Inc. li it ii REPORT ON REVISED FLOODPLAIN CALCULATIONS la II AT STONEWAY CONCRETE, INC. ! ` `-- • RENTON, WASHINGTON ' r.pR 2 314 di -- I; DESCRIPTION AND SCOPE The St'oneway batch plant is located on the right bank of the Cedar River between river mile 1.94 and 1.79 (above Lake Washington) . ! The majority of the Stoneway property is well above the Over channel and has never been classified as being within the 100 year floodplain. However, a portion of the property, adjacent to the west boundary, is lower and has been classified ias floodplain in all previous studies. Stoneway Concrete , Inc.l has proposed to fill this portion of its property and raise it above the 100 year flood level. The city of Renton has questioned what effect the filling of this area will have on flood levels, both upstream and downstream of the Stoneway property. i1This report will assess the impacts on flood levels due to filling on the Stoneway property. The engineering firm of CH2M Hill is currently in the process ofconducting the engineering studies necessary to up- date the FEMA Flood Maps of the Cedar River from river mile 0 to river mile 2. 11 (upstream of Stoneway) . As part of the process, they have 1conducted detailed ground surveys of the river and have produced a computer model of the river for purposes of simulating flood conditions. The modeling has been done using the HEC-2 04ater Surface Profile Program. CH2M Hill has gra- ciously supplied us with their computer input data to allow us to accurately assess the impact of the Stoneway project. Their help in this matter is greatly appreciated. EXISTING CONDITIONS li In the CH2M Hill study, 26 cross-sections were used to model the study reach. Two of those sections , Sec X ( 9446 ) and Sec Y ( 1023;6) are located immediately upstream and downstream of the proposed fill area. Because no section was taken through the proposed fill area ( not dictated by hydraulic considera- tions) , th1e CH2M Hill model cannot be used to assess the impact of the proposed fill. In reality, the CH2M Hill model inherent- ly assumes: that the property has already been filled. In any event, thd Stoneway property is not in the floodway as reported by CH2M HilJ1P1. Hugh G.Goldsmith I! 1 &Associates,Inc. • 1111 For informational purposes , the CH2M Hill model was run and the computer output is attached for reference. The 100 year flood plain elevations for Sec X( 9446) and Sec Y( 10236) were computed as" 35.30 and 37.99 , respectively. This data is under- lined in red in the attached computer output. To assess the impact of the proposed fill , a cross-section through theieriver and proposed fill zone was field surveyed and added to 1the computer model. Three additional modifications were made to the model as follows: 1. The 111 yr. , 50 yr. and 500 yr. runs were eliminated to cut down on the volume of output. 2. The model output instructions were altered to plot the added cross-section and 100 year flood profile. 3. The expansion and contraction coefficients through the added ;.section were altered slightly to account for the suddenllexpansion and contraction of the floodplain. Other than these alterations, no changes were made to the model. N-values , flows and other parameters were as set by CH2M Hill. 1 ,11 The computer output for this "existing condition" run is attached. rThe 100 year flood elevations for Sec X(9446) , added Sec ( 9736) and Sec Y( 10236) are 35. 50, 36. 92 and 37. 67, respec- tively. It is noted that the 100 year flood elevation at Sec Y is different fr"om the CH2M Hill run , some 0.32 feet lower. This is due to the additional data provided by the added section. The CH2M Hill model showed a calculated river bottom slope of 0. 00354 ft/fit between Sections X and Y. The added cross-section results in aIflatter river bottom slope between the new section and Sectionf` X, and a steeper slope between the new section and Section Y (the overall elevation difference between Sec X and Sec Y remaining the same) . The steeper slope upstream of Stone- way results in the marginally lower water surface at Sec Y. POST FILL CONDITIONS 1 The proposal is to fill in the 100 year flood fringe on the Stoneway site. To assess the effect of the fill, the added section was revised to reflect the elevations shown on the pro- posed grading plan. Modifications to the CH2M Hill model noted above were continued except that the expansion/contraction coef- ficients wer'e returned to normal as the sudden expansion/con- traction woullid be eliminated by the fill. I'. 0 Hugh G.Goldsmith 2 Q &Associates,Inc. i The computer output for this run is attached. The 100 year flood elevations for Sec X(9446 ) , added Sec ( 9736 ) and Sec Y( 10236) are 35. 50, 36. 48 and 37. 66 , respectively. As can be seen, the 100 year W.S. past the fill section actually drops slightly. � This is due to the removal of the sudden expansion and contradtion of the floodplain. For the other sections , with- in the accuracy of the methods used, the model shows no impact on the 100 �year W. S. , either upstream or downstream, due to the filling offt.he Stoneway property. • CONCLUSION ] The calculations show that filling of the flood fringe on the Stonewly property will result in no perceptible change of the 100 year W.S. in the Cedar River. /S. GAO's.'A., • / 0.. .00.4_ Ppla To o v o F q " q, y�11 1 /�jjjj_((/�///_ I� t off,/q F�rsT�� ,���..:` �'). '1°S.TE - f,. Engineer 11. `°®°a �� �, lis Hugh G.Goldsmith 3 %-‘0 &Associates,Inc. • 1I , lu G.Goidsmith Associates Inc. 1 � b.� 9 #86121 -1 23 April 1987 Renton Building & Zoning Department 200 Mlii Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Attention: Mr. Donald K. Erickson, AICP Re: Stoneway Special Permit for Grade and Fill of 53,000 cu. yds. at 1915 Maple Valley Highway and Renton letter response dated March 12, 1987 Dear Mr. Erickson, Following is our response to your comments on our referenced special permit. We will address each issue in the order presented in your March 12, 1987 letter. 1. Future plans for the site - Some consideration has been given to the potential use of the site in a very general way. That consideration has been limited to discussions of the possibility of a hotel and small retail use. No effort has been made to evaluate what uses are allowed un- der the code or if there is a market for a hotel/retail use. The fill is being placed to improve the utility of the batch plant site. Future use of the site will be identified some time in the future. 2. Measures being taken to control erosion - The drawings submitted with the special permit application require construction of a -filter fabric fence at the ordinary high water mark on the south side of the fill site, parallel to the Cedar River, prior to beginning work. A berm will be con- structed landward of the filter fence to further contain silt laden storm water on site. As material is placed it will be sloped to to a desiltation pond on the north side of the berm. The settling pond will discharge to the Cedar River. These measures will minimize discharge of silt laden storm water runoff to the river. 3. Especially during flooding of the Cedar River - The landscape plan presented on the application drawings was prepared to conform to our under- standing of Park Department and Public Works Department requirements. If the bank needs additional protection from Cedar River flood waters, we will armor the berm in a manner similar to the bank along the Park-Cedar River interface, or with other protection satisfactory to all City of Renton Departments. The river mean velocity in the area of the proposed project, 3 r Ito, .�,. ;t ; �• �. y3y • /t pyY,rn.y 11FMy.. A r�ayw,,rr y , t I W f« ^ it� '4°0101i,' 66113.. 1181451I "611.4' �✓(°qua a =,r(i]arsM�z,(����aQ8i n� r' n v i rn� p-0 7 .. �10 r -_ r.'.' r ..� tt.iul. awW.4 . 4' v '�e ri,�k �11 Y!"�t 1 :tom �l�riJ�'i++,4M..aiV 044'0141,6 ��OVO,�r,#•} + ��1+i,1 t ��}�ft�{� �� �r s yi'� 4i �,�. i,i u.+fiu+ t!rn,ti� rluhw� � K P d I_H.:�X¢������+ti�P {:��e�lt"1:ri consulting engineers o surveyors o planners Renton Building & Zoning Department Attn: Mr. Donald Erickson 23 April 1987 Page Two during the 100 year storm, is about 8 fps. The velocity along the bank will be less than 8 fps. Well maintained bermuda grass on the slope will ensure a stable slope during normal flooding. 4. Source and type of fill materials - Source of the material is indeterminate at this time. Material to be used for fill will be primarily excess earth from utility construction jobs in Seattle, Kenton, Kent, and King County. Some earth may also come from foundation excavation work for new buildings. The majority of earth in the region is of the Alderwood and Everett types. Alderwood soils compose about 45% of all soils in King County. Everett soils compose another 8% of all soils in King County. Both soils are of the gravelly sandy loam type. The remaining 47% of soils is com- posed of 35 other types, mostly silt loam material. It is likely that some clay silt loam type soils will be placed in the fill. If necessary the applicant will keep records on the origin of all material placed in the fill. 5. Traffic impacts on Maple Valley Highway - The average daily traf- fic on the Maple Valley Highway at the batch plant site is about 26,600 vehicles, based on an actual Washington State Department of Transportation traffic count in 1985 of 25,065 vehicles.' Of that total about 520 are heavy trucks, i.e. trucks hauling gravel, concrete, and solid waste. We estimate that there will be an average of 35 trucks per day arriv- ing at the site to dump material in the fill area. Peak traffic is esti- mated to be 50 trucks per day. Peak daily truck traffic arriving at the fill site amounts to 0.38% of the total average daily one way traffic on the Maple Valley Highway. Generally, total traffic volume impacts of 3 percent or less are not noticeable to most drivers. The proposed new temporary truck traffic is about 6% of the existing heavy truck traffic. 6. Measures that will be taken to keep debris and dirt off City streets - Stoneway trucks have added side boards to their trucks to help keep material in the truck. All trucks have mud flaps which are cleaned regularly. All loads are within legal limits. Some of the trucks arriving at the fill site will be owned by private dirt movers and will not be under the strict control of the applicant. If necessary, trucks will dump their material at the edge of the fill area to minimize the opportunity to track dirt out to the Maple Valley Highway. Trucks leaving the fill area must cross several hundred feet of con- crete pavement before they enter SR169. Any dirt on the vehicle wheels 1 Phone conversation with Dave Oberg, Washington State Department of Transportation, April 6, 1987. Hugh G.Goldsmith &Associates,Inc. Renton Building & Zoning Department Attn: Mr. Donald Erickson 23 April 1987 Page Three should be cleaned off before the trucks reach SR169. As a mater of routine the concrete hardstands on the batch plant site are kept clean. It may be possible to give a specification sheet to all non-Stoneway truck drivers outlining minimum requirements to haul through the City of Renton and into the Stoneway site. 6. Potential adverse impacts (noise, dust, glare) on the City°s ad- jacent Cedar River Park: Noise - Noise studies done in the viciniy of the Cedar River Park/Stoneway Batch Plant by the Washington State DOT show the following: Noise levels south of the Maple Valley Highway centerline for PM peak hour traffic: Distance Noise From Centerline Levels 200 feet 66 dbA 500 feet 61 dbA 700 feet 59 dbA 1000 feet 57 dbA Noise levels from construction equipment at specified distances is: 50 feet 100 feet 200 feet 400 feet Dump Truck 86 80 74 68 Bulldozer 80 74 68 62 Worst case noise impact on the park will occur when the construction equipment is filling the park property. From a technical perspective the Maple Valley Highway noise level is insignificant relative to the noise level of equipment constructing the fill. Consequently, the noise level shown in the chart above can be considered the worst case noise level. Following completion of the fill, the Park Department might choose to reconstruct the existing berm as a visual/noise barrier of the batch plant site. Occasionally, and intermittently', equipment will move through the fill area, following completion of the fill. As previously stated, it is intended that the use of the newly filled area continue to be a staging area for equipment and material. Dust - Material placed in the fill area will contain some water. Material placed with a water content too low to prevent dust will be watered during 2 Phone conversation with Bruce Farar, Washington State Department of Transportation, April 8, 1987. 0 Hugh G.Goldsmith &Associates,Inc. Renton Building & Zoning Department Attn: Mr. Donald Erickson 23 April 1987 Page Four placement and compaction to minimize the creation of airborne dust par- ticles. Prevailing winds are typically from the west (S.W. or N.W.) and normally will help keep spurious dust from settling in the park. Glare - All the operations will occur during the day and no lights will be used during the filling operation. Therefore, the project will not create glare. 7. The erosion problem - the erosion issue was covered in item 2 above. 8. Possible impacts on the City's well system - The Well Field Pro- tection Study prepared for the City of Renton in August, 1984 by CH2MHILL addressed several issues related to the Stoneway Batch Plant. None of the issues considered filling a portion of the site. However, the report did indicate that "The water table within the aquifer is generally at or near the elevation of the water surface in the Cedar River." By filling the site about ten feet the applicant would be more than doubling the amount of cover currently provided over the aquifer in the proposed fill area. When the filling operation is completed the finished surface will be hard and relatively impervious to infiltration and percolation. The highly compacted fill will also act as a barrier to horizontal mitagation of pol- lutants from upstream of the fill site. The fill will also keep polluted flood water separated from the water table to a greater degree than pro- vided now. Since the proposed use of the fill area is continuation of the exist- ing use, the overall affect of placing the fill is seen to be a positive one relative to protection of the City's water supply. , 9. .. .that the fill would not affect the floodway channel - Cedar River data used to generate the new FEMA maps was obtained from CH2MHILL. A new cross-section was added to the existing data at the location of the proposed fill. The HEC 2 program was then run to obtain new flood information based on the proposed fill. A report of the flood plain analysis is attached for your review. The attachments include a map showing the location of the cross-section, a print of a portion of the new draft FEMA map by CH2MHILL showing the study cross section location, computer print outs showing the before fill and after fill flood plain elevations, and a written report describing the analysis procedure. The conclusion reached in the study is that the fill will not affect the elevation of the 100 year flood plain. %,-NO Hugh G.Goldsmith &Associates,Inc. Renton Building & Zoning Department Attn: Mr. Donald Erickson 23 April 1987 Page Five 10. Information on haul routes - Since no sources of fill material have yet been identified it is not possible to describe haul routes to the proposed fill site. At best, it can be stated that the material will originate at locations within the economic haul distance from the propsed project site. Material generated outside the economic haul distance will be taken to other approved fill sites . Potential material sources are ex- pected to be within a radius of 8 to 10 miles from the fill project. Generally, dump trucks use major highways and freeways to transport their loads. Use of local access streets is usually limited to that needed for access to the source of the material. 11. Number of trips per day - It is anticipated that there will be an average of four to five trucks per hour arriving at the site during the work day. It is possible that as many as seven trucks per hour will arrive at the site during peak times. 12. Hours of peak impact m The nature of the anticipated sources of material (i.e. , utility construction projects and foundation excavations) dictate that the truck traffic will be relatively uniform during the con- struction workday, roughly 7 AM to 4 PM. The applicant requested the permit be issued for 7 AM to 8 PM Monday through Saturday to provide the flexibility to work overtime if necessary during the summer construction season. Work would be suspended during evening hours if it conflicted with scheduled evening activities at the Cedar River Park. If additional information is needed to enable the City to complete processing of the grade and fill application, please contact me. Very truly yours, HUGH G. GOLDSMITH & ASSOCIATES, INC. Richard D. Padrick, P.E. RDP:sar Enclosures cc: Don Merlino ® Hugh Associat G.GoesldsIncmith & , . REPORT ON REVISED FLOODPLAIN CALCULATIONS AT STONEWAY CONCRETE, INC. RENTON, WASHINGTON DESCRIPTION AND SCOPE The Stoneway batch plant is located on the right bank of the Cedar River between river mile 1.94 and 1.79 (above Lake Washington) . The majority of the Stoneway property is well above the river channel and has never been classified as being within the 100 year floodplain. However, a portion of the property, adjacent to the west boundary, is lower and has been classified as floodplain in all previous studies. Stoneway Concrete , Inc. has proposed to fill this portion of its property and raise it above the 100 year flood level. The city of Renton has questioned what effect the filling of this area will have on flood levels, both upstream and downstream of the Stoneway property. This report will assess the impacts on flood levels due to filling on the Stoneway property. The engineering firm of CH2M Hill is currently in the process of conducting the engineering studies necessary to up- date the FEMA Flood Maps of the Cedar River from river mile 0 to river mile 2. 11 (upstream of Stoneway) . As part of the process, they have conducted detailed ground surveys of the river and have produced a computer model of the river for purposes of simulating flood conditions. The modeling has been done using the HEC-2 Water Surface Profile Program. CH2M Hill has gra- ciously supplied us with their computer input data to allow us to accurately assess the impact of the Stoneway project. Their help in this matter is greatly appreciated. EXISTING CONDITIONS In the CH2M Hill study, 26 cross-sections were used to model the study reach. Two of those sections , Sec X (9446 ) and Sec Y (10236) are located immediately upstream and downstream of the proposed fill area. Because no section was taken through the proposed fill area (not dictated by hydraulic considera- tions) , the CH2M Hill model cannot be used to assess the impact of the proposed fill. In reality, the CH2M Hill model inherent- ly assumes that the property has already been filled. In any event, the Stoneway property is not in the floodway as reported by CH2M Hill. ® Hugh G.Goldsmith 1 &Associates,Inc. For informational purposes , the CH2M Hill model was run and the computer output is attached for reference. The 100 year flood plain elevations for Sec X( 9446) and Sec Y( 10236) were computed as 35. 30 and 37 .99 , respectively. This data is under- '; lined in red in the attached computer output. To assess the impact of the proposed fill , a cross-section through the river and proposed fill zone was field surveyed and • added to the computer model. Three additional modifications were made to the model as follows: 1. The 10 yr. , 50 yr. and 500 yr. runs were eliminated to cut down on the volume of output. 2. The model output instructions were altered to plot the added cross-section and 100 year flood profile. 3. The expansion and contraction coefficients through the added section were altered slightly to account for the sudden expansion and contraction of the floodplain. Other than these alterations, no changes were made to the model. N-values , flows and other parameters were as set by CH2M Hill, The computer output for this "existing condition" run is attached. The 100 year flood elevations for Sec X(9446) , added Sec ( 9736) and Sec Y( 10236) are 35. 50, 36. 92 and 37.67, respec- tively. It is noted that the 100 year flood elevation at Sec Y is different from the CH2M Hill run , some 0.32 feet lower. This is due to the additional data provided by the added section. The CH2M Hill model showed a calculated river bottom slope of 0. 00354 ft/ft between Sections X and Y. The added cross-section results in a flatter river bottom slope between the new section and Section X, and a steeper slope between the new section and Section Y (the overall elevation difference between Sec X and Sec Y remaining the same) . The steeper slope upstream of Stone- way results in the marginally lower water surface at Sec Y. POST FILL CONDITIONS The proposal is to fill in the 100 year flood fringe on the Stoneway site. To assess the effect of the fill, the added section was revised to reflect the elevations shown on the pro- posed grading plan. Modifications to the CH2M Hill model noted above were continued except that the expansion/contraction coef- ficients were returned to normal as the sudden expansion/con- traction would be eliminated by the fill. (�0 Hugh G.Goldsrnith 2 `(.) &Associates,Inc. The computer output for this run is attached. The 100 year flood elevations for Sec X(9446 ) , added Sec ( 9736 ) and Sec Y( 10236) are 35. 50, 36. 48 and 37. 66, respectively. As can be seen, the 100 year W.S. past the fill section actually drops slightly. This is due to the removal of the sudden expansion and contraction of the floodplain. For the other sections , with- in the accuracy of the methods used, the model shows no impact on the 100 year W° S. , either upstream or downstream, due to the filling of the Stoneway property. CONCLUSION The calculations show that filling of the flood fringe on the Stoneway property will result in no perceptible change of the 100 year W.S. in the Cedar River. ) i ) 0% WASH,I �4 p`� 0 0Io 4. 4.3 o . ,. P,. 0. 1��Fngineet a °°°Q®®cwro,- 0 Hugh G.Goldsmith 3 &Associates,lnc. ,r 0 1 IDb 1 :. :1. 4,1, 0 . ittif ', �D ® i �,� �f4 Y. 900 . X'' '., g . I i:' t�? 1 • �i ! hi . , f fr /' •a :I I / �� Z , /r i " �p _1 J � ‘ y 1 V-". 0 ' ' - WCLLS A i . 0 • • "lc" • so4 `, r. n° 28 `: • ' W0l,11/W1 41 • �� ,; . t , • } c•? Q N 0 O\\ I :? ' p� ), �`��' .; -f • . ,i �• • r �''.! = a 1 \ 4 -.:rr 26 r • \ • r i ✓ 751 •a� n ' • Ar' , . - T'it-'..'•'' t:. t's,•,--` ' if,ie.' - , ' ' • .:%-:.:J." -*-.i -111_,..c' tilfeff0 . .,.. , •., . 7.-,-.4.-.4,+: ..j. ,2...:' . '.....' _-a • . ',., ., / . '." • - . Titi:44. - ..., . • , , ‘''',••. . N .44 1 f It II 1 1. ..1' .7.',.' ,iiiiit '"1.111111115111 . • ''N'' 1 1$4. it - : .'' -.. ' '.i. • • N. ;••, .. .'..' . 'fNe."111:;4 4- • • ,0••• 17n46U7G055 POLAROIDD2 OL W � C OLC, &' 1 _ • ~ , . v .i 4 40011* V • 0\,, . 1.„ " _400 tioi ,ram• 7 6 0 7 0 55 POLAROID.32 STO l\M- ) COV\tiVK 10 -9 f � ...... ' ` +wTr Y v. ' . led- I• • ill!'Ali• 16 • ,,- ♦ 11. , 1 .. I ' ,,i,$1,:k 4. 17n r' ,; t51.5 POLAR01092 STO le-AA'Ak) C)1\.)C RCk I ‘ , ‘, % . . I It.' • • —, 's 3.1.1. . • •;. OP4441PP ' . • ... .... .-‘..- •S.4.....40. 4t... ... , ••.. II . * \* • .. . \ •••••••.k.....,„....„, • • • '.I•. ... . , la \ 41 s T . ",. • • ,.s. 44;•, .,•-,.,,, . 1 • . '‘*. 10 ' 4ifir :.. .. • — .. . ..•,,A111 ..J . i . • , - .....1.14. ... • . . ,. t : '.• 'r e_ A , — ,•A r 'IA . , 4 ikt4 lt, . ...• . :, . ... VA',I _ • .,- •4 4;r. :''...‘. ..N• ' 4*k4 ' ....„. _. y., , '• . , 1 .. 4‘4C.•1 •A'' . .-.• e• 'ire' , . '• 11.•.46,4 .;'', • . •"It: f , 7 ' -.6 .• -e. k v. . ...s. . •A: 1,0 : , ; 4. . 17RtL607s055 POLA12O1D 2 !FP' ,, .t ..ti;&),•• .• . --4. / •i • ‘ • • 'It .....0bii,iice h it, °'4 1. .. " 74 .‘.- ... :' • lid .., 'k- stV r t. � y rc.. •;;. 1.• .s •T•7.• if- ' -.'" :.• -... i.. * . ;„:.1::. 4".11 �Y.- ., r '17R ,.G 7 G 0 5 5 POLARO1D02 3-i"OL)Cwi'q CC rJCR 1 • ry 1. .�'itif 4.4. i �,• I 1711n607 (;055 POLAR01002 370 mtiu C O tUCR. 10 -G -)3°) CITY OF RENTON. . COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT cf) 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 f / STONEWAY CONCRETE FILL AND GRADE .PERMIT' PHOTOGRAPHS TAKEN: OCTOBER 9, 1989• O� \ BUILDING AND ZONING DES";11 1MENT THRESHOLD DETERMINATION STAFF REPORT MARCH 11, 1987 PAGE 2 Engineering: Following comments made: If allowed, the slope adjacent to the river should be constructed and completed quickly. The slope should be 3 to 1. It should also be required to have additional landscaping over and above wild flower hydroseeding. - Trees and shurbs should be planted. All areas below elevation 38 should remain as a heavily landscaped buffer. Trail or landings for fishermen and bikers could be incorporated into landscaping plan. Noted major impacts with respect to water and land and shoreline use. More information requested on earth, environmental health, and aesthetics. Traffic Engineering: Following comments provided: 1. Bonding needed for street cleaning. 2. Hauling operations should be limited between the hours of 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. Noted project would have minor impacts. Utility Engineering: Requested additional information on fill material. Following note added by Robert Bergstrom: I have two concerns that should be addressed: 1. The unclassified fill along the River Bank does not appear to be stable and may slide or erode during high river floods. Also, because our wells are close, we would like to review the source of all material. A geotechnical engineer should review these two items. (Please note the 7 fps peak river flow velocity.) 2. The flood capacity review is not complete enough to me for Public Works to certify that this fill will not affect the floodway of the channel. A more detail presentation should be prepared to justify the contention that the fill does not affect the river flooding, i.e. , cross sections and hydraulic modeling using HEC-2 programs. Policy Development: 1. More information is needed on erosion control. 2. What is the impact on the aquifer? 3. Existing vegetation which serves as a buffer between stoneway and the park will be destroyed. 4. Has the Fisheries Department been notified of this proposal? 5. See comment #3. 3544Z BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT THRESHOLD DETERMINATION STAFF REPORT MARCH 11, 1987 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF-005-87 APPLICATION NO. : SP-005-87, SM-002-87 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for special permit to allow the filling and grading on 3.88 acres of property with approximately 53,000 cubic yards of material in order to bring the property to grade with the remainder of the site, and substantial shorelines development permit to allow said fill and grading within 200 ft. of Cedar River. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Located directly north of the Cedar River at 1915 Maple Valley Highway. AGENCY: City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department SITE AREA: 3.88 acres. ISSUES: Whether adequate provision has been made for flood control; Whether the applicant has sufficiently identified the source and type of fill material; Whether sufficient information has been provided on the effect of the fill on the floodway of the channel; and Whether measures are being taken to control dirt and debris from City roadways. RECOMMENDATIONS: DEFER, pending the submittal of additional information from the applicant as to possible impacts on the City's acquifer; measures being taken to control erosion, especial during flooding; identification of sources and types of fill materials; traffic impacts on Maple Valley Highway; measures being taken to control debris on City streets associated with the filling operation; and construction impacts on the use of the adjacent Cedar River Park. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING AGENCIES: Various City Departments have reviewed and commented upon the project's environmental impact. These comments are as follows: Police: Following comments provided: We do not anticipate traffic impact due to the current improvemnts on location and operating record of Stoneway. Fire Prevention Bureau: No comments. Noted minor impact to Public Services. BUILDING AND ZONING DE_ ___FMENT _ THRESHOLD DETERMINATION STAFF REPORT MARCH 11, 1987 PAGE 3 6. No information was provided on haul routes, trips/day. Major impacts noted with respect to earth, water, plants, animals, land and shoreline use, aesthetic, recreation, and transportation. More information asked on earth, water, animals, aesthetics, and transporation. Building Division: Following comment made: Typical cross sections needed at river and park boundary. Noted major impacts to earth, water and land and shoreline use. Zoning Division: Following comments made: 1. Landscaping along the Cedar River Bank should also include wet tolerant shrubs and trees in the berm along with the hydroseeding, i.e. , cedar trees, willow shrubs. 2. Increase Douglas Fir trees proposed along the north side from 4'-5' to 8' height for better screening and space tightner. 3. Additional coniferous trees and evergreen shrubbery planting should be done to buffer Cedar River Park as a dense screen. 4. Berm area along river bank should be constructed during dry periods to prevent possible erosion. 5. Do not fill below dripline of existing trees. Along river, grading should be no closer than as where berm starts in Cedar River Park. 6. Fence along west side as proposed should be a screening type of fence with wood slats. More information requested. Noted major impacts with respect to earth, land, and shoreline use and aesthetics. More information requested on plants and aesthetics. Parks and Recreation: See attached letter from Sam Chastain to Richard Padrick. 1117 II" U L .� U:) ) 4):1- CITY 115F RENTON • ,,.egt..Q efiPARKS and RECREATION-- Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor • John E. Webley, ®ir•, ' �``''� ' • 111 January 20, 1987 tE t iso 41$, s' 1 tatirrt*tir Mr. Richard Padrick J1\� �� �, 4 lt 501 Lyon Building �0,,1����,�,�p, .r1)'�1���"^ Seattle, WA 98104 Atsi ot"d�A°:°' "`� Dear Richard: 1':71J1 " • ' After reviewing your proposal with staff and landscape architects currently und:rr ' contract to the Cityfor the communitycenter ""'" bg, i . project in Cedar River Park, we have •Qi: � come up with the following concerns: ~ 1) The filling of the Stoneway property would adversely affect the park from a visual and noise standpoint if the existing use is maintained. The large " ` '"^'"" �"' berm and its attendant landscaping between the Carco Theatre and Stoneway property was installed to help mitigate these problems. 2) The filling of the Cedar River flood plain could adversely affect downstream properties (including the park) in the event of a flood. We would like addi- tional information from a• hydrologist concerning this potential problem. 3) The short term traffic increase required to haul in fill material should be addressed (i.e., routes, times, days, etc.) . If Stoneway is allowed to fill the proposed 3.5 acres, our concerns include mitigation of the following: • 1) The depression created between Stoneway and the Carco Theatre (park land) should be filled with clean, free-draining material with the final 12 inches !. being top soil suitable for plantings and turf. 2) The landscape materials currently in place that would be covered with fill • should be replaced. Material should be of the same size. 3) Heavy landscaping should be installed along the property line to help mitigate the negative impacts of increased noise and aesthetics deterioration due to the use of the site. We would be pleased to work with you on the matter of plant material. 4) We would also like to review and work with you on fencing, irrigation, drainage, and proposed construction schedule if your proposal is successful. • If you have any questions or comments, please call me at 235-2560. Sincerely, Sam Chastain Parks Superintendent 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2560 • • y + _ `:fix ":'w: :'y'�;{< *i�. - _s,;' :;r v.,.• ,r.!>. •3? ..ta �t .,x-{.� kuib- 1 ;r:.'i` '%b'L?"�i•>r ti.,. .+.v'' .s: r_:---L.;• - +al.. _ :i+•, '4•_, '� _ J�;t's+` � s`':�•.!���•+l4 ,l..finrr: ..o .s:::^'"�t I N,=:tea. V," •J y u i.. r �. � rt ..L i_ .t•p4^'Y,:'st. •,k,.�-,fir,:;;y •r.,^ r .5- _ i•• -r' >t, F _ Ji'• - _ - z —-.t•C�_''i7':.••.r cY't •i1 ti?.' r, Y4.f �.'r•'Y' ..Wr2a ) :2n is`.e:t` '•',^.•'.� f'•I�•• .:✓ 'tl. S' 1..: .fit. �..%C:. �l>. +::t.Ai�-l`. a).;:C,r�' :'t a,":1 tJ•.•,(5� X%••�i:..'c�., R. ..W'���:.+.r„W.'-..•t•. Si f,' yci'_i: _- :)i- ;:p'd{"�,;...K' _ .i.J.''� •�'.-rn L`�+ �f}yf'-::]1..:. ••�,,•';t.,i4 {,. ,C.�Y?,`?3_:t?'.`4'3 ��:,!:. ta...s' •,j r`�.r,.:i5;t..t� - ! "r_{'i�,�t_-.3, :`ir' L.::r .v:-:7•. _ .:Jl.•".+':.:i`."�.'.>•.r,'�+ -1,r rt•1,_..=t>,.. .f;-r'.y;, "�'• ..r}•3,�-�'.�. .�,i�;&..r47: .r ''L :t - r,, �;:'.: it. .:S`�,i.:� k....-r. ';'r',^?;...,. •r:;�.. y.,,,...,3ra.� a. ;�.;).r .a•--•"�}Se.'.'� s•• _y. „_r T• 5 • yr_ _ _ _ OF R4, .': **- ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT tosge, "` RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR • z ..LL .. O ® MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 O94TE0 SEP BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR March 12, 1987 Mr. Richard Padrick 501 Lyon Building Seattle, WA 98104 RE: Stoneway Special Permit for Grade and Fill of 53,000 cu.yd.s at 1915 Maple Valley Highway Dear Mr. Padrick: The Environmental Review Committee considered your application yesterday at its regular meeting and passed a motion to defer your application pending the submittal of additional information from you regarding: future plans for the site; measures being taken to control erosion, especially during flooding of the Cedar River; source and type of fill materials; traffic impacts on Maple Valley Highway; measures that will be taken to keep debris and dirt off City streets; potential adverse impacts on the City's nearby well system as well as its aquifer; and potential adverse impacts (noise, dust, glare) on the City's adjacent Cedar River Park. At the meeting, Public Works staff noted that a geotechnical engineer should be consulted to review the erosion problem as well as possible impacts on the City's well system. They also indicated that the flood capacity review was not complete enough for them to certify that the fill would not affect the floodway channel. They indicated that "cross sections and hydraulic modeling using HEC-2 programs" should also be done. Information on haul routes, number of trips per day and hours of peak impact should also be provided. As soon as this new information is available, we will be able to proceed with your application. You may wish to talk with Bob Bergstrom in Public Works regarding the erosion problem. If you have any questions, please give me a call at 235-2540. c onald K. Eri son, AICP Zoning Administrator 3555Z 411 �► , :, JAN 1987 40 CITY OF RENTON momPARKS and RECREATION-_... .., Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor John E. Webley, Dir Sii.{'�J7ii .d January 20, 1987 1st a'la \k N `� A 01111I !!7 Mr. Richard Padrick JA u(c y,TIt$: , ` 501 Lyon Building g j ^ Seattle, WA 981049" �� , '''! 1 Dear Richard: f ,EWTH II After reviewing your proposal with staff and landscape architects currently under I contract to the City for the community center project in Cedar River Park, we h,ve .b% M come up with the following concerns: 1) The filling of the Stoneway property would adversely affect the park from a I visual and noise standpoint if the existing use is maintained. The large germ and its attendant landscaping between the Carco Theatre and Stoneway property was installed to help mitigate these problems. 2) The filling of the Cedar River flood plain could adversely affect downstream properties (including the park) in the event of a flood. We would like addi- tional information from a• hydrologist concerning this potential problem. 3) The short term traffic increase required to haul in fill material should be addressed (i.e. , routes, times, days, etc.) . If Stoneway is allowed to fill the proposed 3.5 acres, our concerns include mitigation of the following: 1) The depression created between Stoneway and the Carco Theatre (park land) should be filled with clean, free-draining material with the final 12 inches being top soil suitable for plantings and turf. 2) The landscape materials currently in place that would be covered with fill should be replaced. Material should be of the same size. 3) Heavy landscaping should be installed along the property line to help mitigate the negative impacts of increased noise and aesthetics deterioration due to the use of the site.. We would be pleased to work with you on the matter of plant material. 4) We would also like to review and work with you on fencing, irrigation, drainage, and proposed construction schedule if your proposal is successful. If you have any questions or comments, please call me at 235-2560. Sincerely, �lW•L6/4-4-,;:;6-1 Sam Chastain Parks Superintendent 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2560 RENT"'" BUILDING & ZONING DEPPS 7MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 005 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S) : SPECIAL PERMIT: SP-005-87, SHORELINE MANAGEMENT: SM-002-87 PROPONENT : STONEWAY CONCRETE, INC. AND CITY OF RENTON, PARKS AND RECREATION DEPT. PROJECT TITLE : GRADING AND FILLING FOR STONEWAY CONCRETE, INC. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT TO ALLOW THE FILLING AND GRADING ON 3.88 ACRES OF PROPERTY WITH APPROXIMATELY 53,000 CUBIC YARDS OF MATERIAL IN ORI1FR TO RRTNG Il-IF PRfOPFPTV TO GRIN WITH THE PEMATNOFR OF T1IF SITE, AND SIIRSTl NTTAI SHORELINES DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO ALLOW SAID FILL AND GRADING WITHIN 200 'FEET; OF THE CEDAR RIVE LOCATION : LOCATED •i f T1 Y NORTH OF THE CFDAR RIVFR AT 1915 MAPI F VAI I FY HIGHWAY. TO : 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 0 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION © FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT CITY OF RENTON 0 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT __ - F[_B lU 19B7 POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING / ZONING DEPT. OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : OO P .M. ON FEBRUARY 12, 1987 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; ./', F/C E& /A) E_,J/JCT APPROVED [2-1.15-1DROVED WITH CONDITIONS LI NOT APPROVED etc, 140 3 7e4 4-4e, Le tr • DATE: 0 07 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHOR ED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 r/ . RENT' BUILDING & ZONING DEPQ` MENT / DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF. - 005 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S) : SPECIAL PERMIT: SP-005-87, SHORELINE MANAGEMENT: SM-002-87 PROPONENT : STONEWAY CONCRETE, INC. AND CITY OF RENTON, PARKS AND RECREATION DEPT. PROJECT TITLE : GRADING AND FILLING FOR STONEWAY CONCRETE, INC. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT TO ALLOW THE FILLING AND GRADING ON 3.88 ACRES OF PROPERTY WITH APPROXIMATELY 53,000 CUBIC YARDS OF MATERIAL IN fRfFR TO RIIT\IG TNF PRIlPFPTY To (RALIF WITH THE PFMATU FR QF 'Luc STD, ANFI SIIRSTANTTAI SHORELINES DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO ALLOW SAID FILL AND GRADING WITHIN 200 FEET' OF THE CEDAR RIVE LOCATION : LOCATED DIRECTLY NORTH OF THE LFDAR RIDER AT 1915 MAPLE VAIIFY HIGHWAY_ TO : El PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : ENGINEERING DIVISION FlTRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : ® UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT ® .:UILDI . & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON FEBRUARY 12, 1987 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : -. OAPPROVED OAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ®'NOT APPROVED P/G c go sf i-- G"7°-ia/0T 4/ , _r--i-- /U ? / P ore-iG c, -„u w i2 ��r., C_ DATE: /2F2 A'?U E OF ,REC OR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 f RENTS-- BUILDING & ZONING DEPA,"MENT ' DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF — 005 _ 87 APPLICATION NO(S) : SPECIAL PERMIT: SP-005-87, SHORELINE MANAGEMENT: SM-002-87 PROPONENT : STONEWAY CONCRETE, INC. AND CITY OF RENTON, PARKS AND RECREATION DEPT. PROJECT TITLE : GRADING AND FILLING FOR STONEWAY CONCRETE, INC. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT TO ALLOW THE FILLING AND GRADING ON 3.88 ACRES OF PROPERTY WITH APPROXIMATELY 53,000 CUBIC YARDS OF MATERIAL IN ORfFR In RRINL THE PR.DPFRTY in AR.ADF In1TTH THE 1 EMAINf1FR or T F Sur, AND SIIRSTANTTAL SHORELINES DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO ALLOW SAID FILL AND GRADING WITHIN 200 FEET':OF THE CEDAR RIVE LOCATION : LOCATED DIfcECTLY NORTH OF THE CFDAR RIVER AT 19i5 MAPI F VAI I FY HIGHWAY. TO : PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : ENGINEERING DIVISION n TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : EUTILITIES ENG . DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU ® PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT 0 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 0 POLICE DEPARTMENT • El POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT I I OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON FEBRUARY 12, 1987 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : ( h71/7 eA! -• n APPROVED [1] APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS EINOT APPROVED [UTILILY APPROVAL SUBJECT To wa ��e pit y�vt-,LATE COMERS AGREEMENT-G?;---1 A/O LATE COMERS AGREEMENT-Sa.; ,L 0 fl .r_��. v f RES100 SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-MEN � OAT •SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-SEWER: n �✓ 1• SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE-WATER A jb „ ®WO r G —1 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE-SEWER /)1) °A4j- .Pi- 1%9 ( 2'14 . APPROVED WATER PLAN /V Z®�����E '�APPROVED SEWER PLAN NO tAta 1 APPROVED FIRE HYDRANT LOCATIONS Q 1� BY FIRE DEPT. /1I0 ��j s 0 FIRE FLc"J ANALYSIS AV • • DATE: c/ /g AT SIGNATURE OF IRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 • �.1E M©;RLA�N�QIU°�-�b' • , ,1 To Evi,10til1 - c��vl fl FEE 1987 Date Z1 V/7- From tRJ• 4 _. ,.�.,�.., SUILIJii l7 / LUI`IfV i U I. Subject 5 c( Pew,=- S -06S'S �' S .Nr. c 7 d- v J 5 k ca c.e CI on,ee"Ms She d ciJtcs Se. ' . as4�J 44a) sl<d-e cturn olvh Io d_s s a e,,e dfAti �S arc�U , , (Are. t-,-dd id j I/-e. revaet,., -f"2 5'Ocn/CQ_ ca( //etc //cave.rc1� Pc I 1a Ge6*,cAN,.6.( . st,O,J Q i`e- g -c a P = I dine nralfn fl`e 7-Fes Pe4k --1�G(,11 ��' i' f/ R� 63•// ,/f ,va agepite .r(c, c y �& C&c ( , ru ere. . <4J 7 ;' A.G/ sG d ee p ejwc�l j(4,4 5- — d!TL�i�� � //� �n�iir �L.c�T ���7 i1�rdG�cas�-5 u✓ C�G� RENT;__° BUILDING & ZONING DEP! w 'MENT .. DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 005 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S) : SPECIAL PERMIT: SP-005-87, SHORELINE MANAGEMENT: SM-002-87 PROPONENT : STONEWAY CONCRETE, INC. AND CITY OF RENTON, PARKS AND RECREATION DEPT. PROJECT TITLE : GRADING AND FILLING FOR STONEWAY CONCRETE, INC. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT TO ALLOW THE FILLING AND GRADING ON 3.88 ACRES OF PROPERTY WITH APPROXIMATELY 53,000 CUBIC YARDS OF MATERIAL IN OREWR To Ramo T4F PROPERTY To I;_R.Ai1F WITH 'MP RFMAINDFR f1F TNF CTT.F, ANfl SIIRSTANTTAI SHORELINES DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO ALLOW SAID FILL AND GRADING WITHIN 200' FEET' OF THE CEDAR RIVE LOCATION : LOCATED DIRECTLY NORTH OF THE CEDARRIVFR AT 1915 MAPI F VALLEY HIGHWAY. TO : El PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : El ENGINEERING DIVISION El TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION El FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU Ei PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT � C_ 1:1 r r 1987 O1L POLICE DEPARTMENT L ~ OPOLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING /ZONING DEPT. 111] OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON FEBRUARY 12, 1987 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : r APPROVED 0 APPROVED WI ONDITIONS ,, NOT APPROVED 9 ,74 .-7z S , ( f se7,1-4-X fre- etif TE: , SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED EPRESENTATIVE *= REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 RENT1_._ BUILDING & ZONING. DEPA TENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEErNTON E B 3 1987 POUCY ECF - 005 - 87 DEVELOPMENT I1FPT APPLICATION NO(S) : SPECIAL PERMIT: SP-005-87, SHORELINE MANAGEMENT: SM-002-87 'PROPONENT : STONEWAY CONCRETE, INC. AND CITY OF RENTON, PARKS AND RECREATION DEPT. PROJECT TITLE : GRADING AND FILLING FOR STONEWAY CONCRETE, INC. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT TO ALLOW THE FILLING AND GRADING ON 3.88 ACRES OF PROPERTY WITH APPROXIMATELY 53,00.0 CUBIC YARDS OF MATERIAL IN ORDFP TIl RUNG IHF PP.pPFPTY T1l PWA F WITH TNF REML TNIIFP nF THE STTE., ANn cHRSTANTTAI SHORELINES DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO ALLOW SAID FILL AND GRADING WITHIN 200'•:EEET;:OF"THE:CEDAR RIVEF LOCATION : LOCATED DIRECTLY NORT1H OF THE CEDAR RIVER_ AT 1915 MAPI F VALLEY HIGHWAY. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : ENGINEERING DIVISION El TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION El FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU El PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT • fl POLICE DEPARTMENT OLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT El OTHERS': COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P ,M. ON FEBRUARY 12, 1987 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : PDeLLUIVALLAtot--- APPROVED . 1=1 APPROVED WITH ,G DITIONS NOT APPROVED v414 rk-"_ 1"12-117°-4-- 41/ .A.A".41-.° rjlite* et.ifew‘44‘1•4411 Loa /0404-47QA-A-44-UAL-0--e-4. AA4=-C-4TYTA-CLL it-4.4.25ettejkApc. I DATE: 14 1 I1 SS-- SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZEDt4LAALAdel PRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 • Form 182 RENT-"1 BUILDING & ZONING DEPta"TMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - W5 - 87 APPLICATION . NO(S) : SPECIAL PERMIT: SP-005-87, SHORELINE MANAGEMENT: SM-002-87 PROPONENT : STONEWAY CONCRETE, INC. AND CITY OF RENTON, PARKS AND RECREATION DEPT. PROJECT TITLE : GRADING AND FILLING FOR STONEWAY CONCRETE, INC. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT TO ALLOW THE FILLING AND GRADING ON 3.88 ACRES OF PROPERTY WITH APPROXIMATELY 53,000 CUBIC YARDS OF MATERIAL IN ORnFR_ TQ RPTNn Mr PPfPPRTV TI _GRAfF WITH TNF RFMAINIIFR 1W THE STTF, ANQ SIIRSTANTTAI SHORELINES DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO ALLOW SAID FILL AND GRADING WITHIN 200'.FEET: OF THE CEDAR RIVET LOCATION : LOCATED DIRECTLY NORTH OF TNF CEDAR RIVFR AT 1915 _MAPI E VAI I FY HIGHWAY. TO : El PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 111 UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION © FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU 0 PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT El POLICE DEPARTMENT . _... 0 POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT El OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M, ON FEBRUARY 12, 1987 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : APPROVED El APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS Ell NOT APPROVED CITY OF RENTON 1 r E 3 0 41987 polLDING/ZONING 0,1 /e ___ DATE: , 4/ /f'/7 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 o. .r RENT BUILDING & ZONING DEP! —' MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF — 005 — 87 APPLICATION NO(S) : SPECIAL PERMIT: SP-005-87, SHORELINE MANAGEMENT: SM-002-87 PROPONENT : STONEWAY CONCRETE, INC. AND CITY OF RENTON, PARKS AND RECREATION DEPT. PROJECT TITLE : GRADING AND FILLING FOR STONEWAY CONCRETE, INC. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION. FOR SPECIAL PERMIT TO ALLOW THE FILLING AND GRADING ON 3.88 ACRES OF PROPERTY WITH APPROXIMATELY 53,000 CUBIC YARDS OF MATERIAL IN nRflFR TO f3aTNL II-IF PUIPPETY Tn GRADE WITH THE RFMATNIlFQ OF INF STF, AND SIIRSTANTTAI SHORELINES DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO ALLOW SAID FILL AND GRADING WITHIN 200' FEET: OF THE CEDAR RIVE LOCATION : LOCATED DIRECTLY NORTH OF THE CEDAR RIDER AT 1915 MAPLF VALLEY HIGHWAY. TO : PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : OUTILITIES ENG , DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU OPARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT OBUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT EPOLICE DEPARTMENT 0 POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON FEBRUARY 12, 1987 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : � APPROVED OAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED //El- cc:1;74 7 DATE: �� �✓ SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 % 4 - ` REN1 'I BUILDING & ZONING DEP `?TMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 005 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S) : SPECIAL PERMIT: SP-005-87, SHORELINE MANAGEMENT: SM-002-87 PROPONENT : STONEWAY CONCRETE, INC. AND CITY OF RENTON, PARKS AND RECREATION DEPT. PROJECT TITLE : GRADING AND FILLING FOR STONEWAY CONCRETE, INC. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT TO ALLOW THE FILLING AND GRADING ON 3.88 ACRES OF PROPERTY WITH APPROXIMATELY 53,000 CUBIC YARDS OF MATERIAL IN NUR TO RUNIC 2HF PRIIPFETY To f;RAf1F WITH TNF RFMAIINI]FR 1W "MP STTE, AND SIIRSTANTTAI SHORELINES DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO ALLOW SAID FILL AND GRADING WITHIN 200 FEET OF THE CEDAR RIVE LOCATION : LOCATED DIRECTLY NORTH OF THE CEDAR RIVER AT 1915 MAPI E VAl I FY HIGHWAY. TO : PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 0 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : El UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT El BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT El POLICE DEPARTMENT E1 POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT El OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P .M. ON FEBRUARY 12, 1987 8 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : A.Ad6 n APPROVED g APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS El] NOT APPROVED cce 52w1 Cha r/ h f 'e' '- dd/e/ /4 /6,2 7 M'c /o'4 /6I CITY OF RENT FEB 161987 BUILDING /'ZONING DEPT. pc.„(. 4 DATE: ZI`�/ �, SIGNAT/ OF R OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 � s U ,JAN � 1487 % "� CITY OF RENTON jz!9g.�y°�' � � PARKS and RECREATION.-_,_... • Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor • John E. Webley, Dir ^0 January 20, 1987IR t ASV [►',� ;; 1� ' Mr. Richard Padrick is Ih 501 Lyon Buildingfis4 pt, � t ` Seattle, WA 98104 . �joO'� d► sm. 's Dear Richard: 4 KEITH 10 After reviewing your proposal with staff and landscape architects currently und:"T $ contract to the City for the community center project in Cedar River Park, we h.ve ep; M come up with the following concerns: TOM 1) The filling of the Stoneway property would adversely affect the park from a 11 visual and noise standpoint if the existing use is maintained. The large berm and its attendant landscaping between the Carco Theatre and Stoneway property was installed to help mitigate these problems. 2) The filling of the Cedar River flood plain could adversely affect downstream properties (including the park) in the event of a flood. We would like addi- tional information from a' hydrologist concerning this potential problem. 3) The short term traffic increase required to haul in fill material should be addressed (i.e. , routes, times, days, etc.) . If Stoneway is allowed to fill the proposed 3.5 acres, our concerns include mitigation of the following: 1) The depression created between Stoneway and the Carco Theatre (park land) should be filled with clean, free-draining material with the final 12 inches being top soil suitable for plantings and turf. 2) The landscape materials currently in place that would be covered with fill should be replaced. Material should be of the same size. 3) Heavy landscaping should be installed along the property line to help mitigate the negative impacts of increased noise and aesthetics deterioration due to the use of the site. We would be pleased to work with you on the matter of plant material. 4) We would also like to review and work with you on fencing, irrigation, drainage, and proposed construction schedule if your proposal is successful. If you have any questions or comments, please call me at 235-2560. Sincerely, CITY OF RENTON M Sam Chastain Parks Superintendent �II FEB 16 1937 J 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2560 BUILDING /ZONING DEPT. RENT1 BUILDING & ZONING DEPA AENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - - APPLICATION NO(S) : PROPONENT : PROJECT TITLE : BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: LOCATION : TO: EI PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 1 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION El FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU n PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT El BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 111 POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : f,/ -1/it/E./2.//✓&7 111 APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 111 NOT APPROVED /r € CA, r^a � . �?l �'� /+�L � etd41, .�'/ de / /f', r ai, 2 G G 3, I .r. C ' OF R E NTO N DATE : z q2 JA SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE / � z- / ;�7"5'!'O,"6115 InP)'�. RENT1 BUILDING & ZONING DEPA MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - C205 - Z . APPLICATION NO(S) : Sp-- 005 '81, 5rn- G0Z-37 PROPONENT : Or 1A)A,-,\ CiON)C.R .yct • PROJECT TITLE : BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: LOCATION : TO : 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : ENGINEERING DIVISION ri TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : El UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION n FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT n POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 0 OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P ,M, ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :m ' ,(j&)(f')(�, n APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS n NOT APPROVED 1 )o CRZAD1r C, M \1/40R119 Li N `' CP -rm 1 S TO (DC K.A.zwdO RN)12, GRADINvo s Ln I; sel R t'rc A• I'Yn II'U V1 vA hi CAF �O`- j'p' TO F-U o ,v 'O(Z UE /i c1(o/0 St-16Ncp, 13(),ppC2- B l\-)0 PO3s I f�LE FOTU.R.J PeasTR.1 Aro Pr CCU SS- a GRAD!D k)(0 s 1-\-ku., ovo-! ' ccc( 2' I SLOP t, A-f 13 to e e C6-4.,0, k.+art•2 d 1 vvi &d'(4 1i f eo&ojkom Sk pu bS, 1a,, ,d 6Zoutvo c,e , 0 to\-4K l n u P.A.Eh-V0 I': t-eseeD/Oe ao roK. 1 r, Fu i R i z, C) SuvDsyp,rvi oil_., U (AlAtIor) t2)LY& sl-kout-13 '3E PRGuf f ,b Nu)p36 c,)7'( p r;Kt<%5ior l u-fay/ P NOKg.T'( LA tuc 0 c Nelf Gc.CNV E.__ -- 15 ro ita, u56) I v' !pPRO DATE : SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV1810N 5/1982 Form 182 NVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW ET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 7010.) DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUARY 3. 1987 COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 12,1987 ECF - 005 - 87 APPLICATION NO(s). SPECIAL PERMIT: SP-005-87, SHORELINE MANAGEMENT;SM-002-87 PROPONENT: STONEWAY CONCRETE, INC AND CITY OF RENTON. PARKS AND RECREATION DEPT. PROJECT TITLE: GRADING AND FILLING FOR STONEWAY CONCRETE, INC. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT TO ALLOW THE FILLIING AND GRADING ON 3.88 ACRES OF PROPERTY WITH APPROXIMATELY 53,000 CUBIC YARDS OF MATERIAL IN ORDER TO BRING THE PROPERTY TO GRADE WITH THE REMAINER OF THE SITE, AND SUBSTANTIAL L39fFilaIES DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO ALLOW c,AID FILL AND GRADING WITHIN 200 FT. OF CEDAR RIVE LOCATED DIRECTLY NORTH OF THE CEDAR RIVER AT 1915 MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY. SITE AREA: BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth \>< 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants X 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources }� 7) Environmental Health �v 8) Land and Shoreline Use (>< 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare ✓ 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services X.. 16) Utilities COMMENTS: ✓ LRIODSCAPING A<W(U( C PirZ R,I u 12 )K 5 l ULM AUS4 1 "JCLUOG s oitu65 ) avC0 N4-fovseeark.6 . I CifAtz_T-R,e8a, wiucLo 514126f65 , I rU c2Q. Q. DQu G L,PA FIR_ 1-RA4 io pcad . Udrl, s�ode rizam4 ' to 6 ' 95p19c L 7 ff* t'UU k1oc)rJ/t C(v1 F R.Ous 'i-R - a 061Ni 3Htu 2j )14,+P )11/U 0 St Jv 0oh✓ i U l' OpicdrZ COOR12_ 1�� 2 PP K i , PQA t SAWirtio IZhn �tz o V( SZ.I vaz_ 5Houuc, C_o ry 5`fR,ucya1 �UZ I IU 0m FeR1005 pR unlit fkc), S I(3LIE ( ROSION,, bizo a roe p LO �lza l�� -"c.5��0(0 r �v� �-� &RAD 'rvco 5v-vuLo kti -oLobei2 *6) vt }�2� 131�IZ1'I'l s��R'�5 1 czb 1�2 iZ,l v�K_ l�R, RECOMMENDATION: II DNS CI MITIGATED DNS (1 EIS REVIEWED BY: � p�JL.�� _ �.v�CI TITLE: 2'/7-8 DATE: FORM ##14 SGIZ, Ni 0(0 7�`1 6 ems-6-)vu000 .S Led_ m REVISED 9/10/85 V . ,. i 2149N ENVIRONMMENT L CHECKLIST REVIEW'SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: P L'i DATE CIRCULATED: COMMENTS DUE: 'S S/8' 2 EFC - - APPLICATION NO(S). : PROPONENT: ,S I o n}ij GJ P y sP -/,q e_ )00�,ea/ / PROJECT TITLE: BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: LOCATION: SITE AREA: BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth V/ 2) Air `� 3) Water fr,-- 4) Plants 5) Animals �' 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health '!---' 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing v- 10) Aesthetics ''® 11) Light and Glare ``'-- 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation co 14) Transportation `.---- `.--- 15) Public Services 16) Utilities ,.------ COMMENTS: S e.-e_ r-t-to-{•e s e-n. /"F(6Y,i e/s-i-L, CITY 0i7;---t)' r f',, ,C,-i 1 ) ..,.., ._.0 _\ 9� E ii \-- opf\) 11B7 U Bo no I ZONE DEPT. irr i is We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. /2/ 4-- Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date , `IVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW T REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Ph,r ks DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUARY 3. 1987 COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 19,1987 ECF - 005 - 87 APPLICATION NO(s). SPECIAL PERMIT: SP-005-87, SHORELINE MANAGEMENT:SM-002-87 PROPONENT: STONEWAY CONCRETE, INC. AND CITY OF RENTON, PARKS AND RECREATION DEPT. PROJECT TITLE: GRADING AND FILLING FOR STONEWAY CONCRETE, INC. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT TO ALLOW THE FILL•ING AND GRADING ON 3.88 ACRES OF PROPERTY WITH APPROXIMATELY 53,000 CUBIC YARDS OF MATERIAL IN ORDER TO BRING THE PROPERTY TO GRADE WITH THE REMAINER OF THE SITE, AND SUBSTANTIAL CUI UN ES DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO. ALLOW sRID FILL AND GRADING WITHIN 200 FT. OF CEDAR RIVER LOCATED DIRECTLY NORTH OF THE CEDAR RIVER AT 1915 MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY. SITE AREA: BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth K 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants X° 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health • 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation X 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: /4gjj/�i l /N��cr �� /lz a/J? fee S�w C • G7 . EB 161967 BUILDING / ZnN DEFT. RECOMMENDATION: El DNS = MITIGATED DNS 17 EIS REVIEWED BY: C/eV in /•Girl/ TITLE: ///40 to6, *i4 DATE: 2/12 /f? FORM #14 REVISED 9/10/85 - IVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW : T REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: PUce___ DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUARY 3. 1987 COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 12,1987 ECF - 005 - 87 APPLICATION NO(s). SPECIAL PERMIT: SP-005-87, SHORELINE MANAGEMENT:SM-002-87 PROPONENT: STONEWAY CONCRETE, INC. AND CITY OF RENTON, PARKS AND RECREATION DEPT. PROJECT TITLE: GRADING AND FILLING FOR STONEWAY CONCRETE, INC. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT TO ALLOW THE FILLING AND GRADING ON 3.88 ACRES OF PROPERTY WITH APPROXIMATELY 53,000 CUBIC YARDS OF MATERIAL IN ORDER TO BRING THE PROPERTY TO GRADE WITH THE REMAINER OF THE SITE, AND SUBSTANTIAL L`UI; ES DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO ALLOW sAID FILL AND GRADING WITHIN 200 FT. OF CEDAR RIVER LOCATED DIRECTLY NORTH OF THE CEDAR RIVER AT 1915 MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY. SITE AREA: BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION r 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants • 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics ,11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: 2-^ v? 7f2_/Cc c �.�vL,6n z/, elZev Z&e 0 elm c` ClG'10c�. 40—e -1P2776 c- /rae7--- C du- p � -It� CIGeogl2 cep /i7� v e���J O lre.417- ! re coite( G S 4 c GuG �i T� %if t �rrON in. L � �- =: 0 V I 301LGa 'G ZONING an RECOMMENDATION: 1 DNS 0 MITIGATED DNS J 1 EIS REVIEWED BY: TITLE: /2 , G7� DATE: v .7 FORM ##14 REVISED 9/10/85 WIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEWS ;T • RRenton Fir,O't� FEWING D� I ' NT: Ftre ,' euEA ' I. 'FEBRUARY 3. 1987 COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 12.19R7 ECF - 005 - 87 lAW 4 1 i LICATIOt��Iurs). SPECIAL PERMIT: SP-005-87, SHORELINE MANAGEMENT:SM-002-87 -31 ., INEN2: InigEWAY CONCRETE, INC. AND CITY OF RENTON, PARKS AND RECREATION DEPT. PROJECT TITLE: GRADING AND FILLING FOR STONEWAY CONCRETE, INC. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT TO ALLOW THE FILLIING AND GRADING ON 3.88 ACRES OF PROPERTY WITH APPROXIMATELY 53,000 CUBIC YARDS OF MATERIAL IN. ORDER TO BRING THE PROPERTY TO GRADE WITH THE REMAINER OF THE SITE, AND SUBSTANTIAL a) ps DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO. ALLOW s,AID FILL AND GRADING WITHIN 200 FT. OF CEDAR RIVER LOCATED DIRECTLY NORTH OF THE CEDAR RIVER AT 1915 MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY. SITE AREA: BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing . 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: C17y OF Red ` N ECEBVI Lc-ln BUILDING /ZONING Dc&i RECOMMENDATION: F DNS D MITIGATED DNS ri EIS REVIEWED BY: TITLE: �r2L c, 7...„,..a„, DATE: - r y /947 _ FORM #14 REVISED 9/10/85 / - ----- IRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW S$ t-EB3 1987 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Pdl‘c,_] POLICY DEVELOPMPNT nr-v' DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUARY 3. 1987 COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 12,1987 • ECF - 005 - 87 APPLICATION NO(s). SPECIAL PERMIT: SP-005-87, SHORELINE MANAGEMENT:SM-002-87 PROPONENT:' ST6NEWAY CONCRETE, INC. AND CITY OF RENTON, PARKS AND RECREATION DEPT. PROJECT TITLE: GRADING AND FILLING FOR STONEWAY CONCRETE, INC. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT TO ALLOW: THE FILL'ING AND GRADING ON 3.88 ACRES OF PROPERTY WITH APPROXIMATELY 53,000 CUBIC YARDS OF MATERIAL IN: ORDER TO BRING THE PROPERTY TO GRADE WITH THE REMAINER. OF THE SITE, AND SUBSTANTIAL LS;HDRFT�NES DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO ALLOWicp;+ID FILL AND (GRADING WITHIN 200 FT. OF CEDAR RIVER. ``UUII::HA'I 1luUlf`V� `-.�• LOCATED DIRECTLY NORTH OF THE CEDAR RIVER AT 1915 MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY. SITE AREA: BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMMATION 1) Earth V V 1 2) Air I 3) Water V V y' 4) Plants V/3 5) Animals • V '14 Vi 6) Energy and Natural Resources V 7) Environmental Health ✓ 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing Vr 10) Aesthetics V. ✓ =t 11) Light and Glare ✓ 12) Recreation ✓ 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation V 14) Transportation V V # 15) Public Services V9 16) Utilities 1/ COMMENTS: 'I . ,tywru, A.444 kA 11.44..4.c.A. irn eA.6-44". c-avDt.4.4 • • 14AM.Adt AM.` ta‘Al(144.442i4:4AWMA It°484 . trinalAbA ' tteilise. , . .. 4.. Riztso 4.4.4 1 . I CLIQ* KAstAtrt../..4... el.. ttnt-e-i-0441-- 0-4,44._ -/A.A. ie,,,,,.... Go . .A,,,,:t 0 , 14).04 rx.rui.t.aLuk evt kati.....(4 AzIAAA4 k . tAAr4 1 - • RECOMMEND ION: g El DNS Q MITIGATED DNS n EIS WitA4 01-4 95 104.44.. 7 REVIEWED BY. ITLE: _ A-y A A L DATE: . neg.— • FORM #14 8 No RE-6 mEy NATION AT 7I* -TIME — ,P '�(eN is TAIa't'I L )r t I e4:MPL-ET JIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW S T REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Tvn. c, DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUARY 3. 1987 COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 12,1987 ECF - 005 - 87 APPLICATION NO(s). SPECIAL PERMIT: SP-005-87, SHORELINE MANAGEMENT:SM-002-87 PROPONENT: STONEWAY CONCRETE. INC. AND CITY OF RENTON, PARKS AND RECREATION DEPT. PROJECT TITLE: GRADING AND FILLING FOR STONEWAY CONCRETE, INC. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT TO ALLOW THE FILL'ING AND GRADING ON 3.88 ACRES OF PROPERTY WITH APPROXIMATELY 53,000 CUBIC YARDS OF MATERIAL IN ORDER TO BRING THE PROPERTY TO GRADE WITH THE REMAINER OF THE SITE, AND SUBSTANTIAL LNNES DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO ALLOW' c,AID FILL AND GRADING WITHIN 200 FT. OF CEDAR RIVER LOCATED DIRECTLY NORTH OF THE CEDAR RIVER AT 1915 MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY. SITE AREA: BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants '�� 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing v---- 10) Aesthetics �' 11) Light and Glare /� 12) Recreation .1%--- 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation l/ 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: I-1 a a c-Sql 6 e. / 47,- ;7 4,..,e 1,,,,z,iee- .. ,Q � ?� CITY OF RENTON - EC- ElVE1)\ r�B1®1997 BUILDING /ZONING DEPT. _ RECOMMENDATION: DNS Q MITIGATED DNS [D EIS REVIEWED BY: Z/!;:,4.4 . O . ITLE: DATE __./� /4P/7 FORM #14 REVISED 9/10/85 T \ 1 ..._ /IRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SI r REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: rfnryt-,-._Artl } DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUARY 3. 1987 COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 19,1987 ECF - 005 — 87 APPLICATION NO(s). SPECIAL PERMIT: SP-005-87, SHORELINE MANAGEMENT:SM-002-87 PROPONENT: STONEWAY CONCRETE, INC. AND CITY OF RENTON, PARKS AND RECREATION DEPT. PROJECT TITLE: GRADING AND FILLING FOR STONEWAY CONCRETE, INC. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT TO ALLOW THE FILL.ING AND GRADING ON 3.88 ACRES OF PROPERTY WITH APPROXIMATELY 53,000 CUBIC YARDS OF MATERIAL IN ORDER TO BRING THE PROPERTY TO GRADE WITH THE REMAINER OF THE SITE, AND SUBSTANTIAL LMS DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO ALLOW c,AID FILL AND GRADING WITHIN 200 FT. OF CEDAR RIVER LOCATED DIRECTLY NORTH OF THE CEDAR RIVER AT 1915 MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY. SITE AREA: BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 0 o L/ 2) Air ✓ 3) Water 4) Plants l/ 5) Animals 1- 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health L/ 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing ✓ 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 0 �/ 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 1/ 14) Transportation 15) Public Services '...------ - 16) Utilities (" COMMENTS: 1;.J ,�//( /aw�1. �eGo �! �,- - `�'`�`". �1 +p42- ( C-4-0(-- ..-e--1-r-1.3 __€,,_42-1,-- 3 6 , ...,,,,e-2--€2-- --er4.--,-- a_ AP-cw-e--6 ,ae-..--,/a-e-r-,_,( RECOMMENDATION: Ej DNS q217MITIGATED DNS. cr n EIS CITY OF RENTON 1 REVIEWED BY. IL TITLE• a •` ni 17 F.B 101937 .„) DATE: .. ,. , ._Y F9 #14 9/10/85 BUILDING /ZONIN WW w ' } FIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW S I REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Lt{'•►Ae S DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUARY 3. 1987 COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 12.1987 ECF - 005 - 87 APPLICATION NO(s). SPECIAL PERMIT: SP-Q05-87, SHORELINE MANAGEMENT:SM-002-87 PROPONENT: STONEWAY CONCRETE, INC. AND CITY OF RENTON, PARKS AND RECREATION DEPT. PROJECT TITLE: GRADING AND FILLING FOR STONEWAY CONCRETE, INC. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT TO ALLOW THE FILLIING AND GRADING ON 3.88 ACRES OF PROPERTY WITH APPROXIMATELY 53,000'CUBIC YARDS OF MATERIAL IN ORDER TO BRING THE PROPERTY TO GRADE WITH THE REMAINER OF THE SITE, AND SUBSTANTIAL LHII ES DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO• ALLOW' c.AID FILL AND GRADING WITHIN 200 FT. OF CEDAR RIVER LOCATED DIRECTLY NORTH OF THE CEDAR RIVER AT 1915 MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY. SITE AREA: BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation j) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: %J01>to fr0fJ idl /3.-0- mAJ rIEC61 A c c.3 0 410 tititLD`�G 1�ON1�� D` i. RECOMMENDATION: 0 I I DNS E] MITIGATED DNS El REVIEWED BY: 'ro I TITLE: (T/L • CAC- DATE: A/ "9 /gy FORM #14 REVISED 9/10/85 V" ' , 4IRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW sr REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ' t ,0c-A l r { DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUARY 3, 1987 COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 19.1987 ECF - 005 - 87 APPLICATION NO(s). SPECIAL PERMIT: SP-005-87, SHORELINE MANAGEMENT:SM-002-87 PROPONENT: STONEWAY CONCRETE, INC. AND CITY OF RENTON, PARKS AND RECREATION DEPT. PROJECT TITLE: GRADING AND FILLING FOR STONEWAY CONCRETE, INC. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT TO ALLOW THE FILLIING AND GRADING ON 3.88 ACRES OF PROPERTY WITH APPROXIMATELY 53,000 CUBIC YARDS OF MATERIAL IN. ORDER TO BRING. THE PROPERTY TO GRADE WITH THE REMAINER OF THE SITE, AND SUBSTANTIAL a) ES DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO. ALLOW sp,ID FILL AND GRADING WITHIN 200 FT. OF CEDAR RIVER LOCATED DIRECTLY NORTH OF THE CEDAR RIVER AT 1915 MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY. SITE AREA: BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 1 X 2) Air 3) Water X 4) Plants )( 5) Animals iK 6) Energy and Natural Resources .. X 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 1 9) Housing X 10) Aesthetics `)4 11) Light and Glare V 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation .R 14) Transportation Y . 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: /�Q/c,Q C- c RQ S,J . -c-7 a A" `-5- ��� P-1-- giu &--de--- 'd gle 4 0)aiuo-Die RECOMMENDATION: 11 DNS Q MITIGATED DNS n EIS REVIEWED BY: ��(/::::: 2 TITLE: DATE: Z—/7 ?7 FORM #14 REVISED 9/10/85 /�. • 0398Z 4 CITY OF RENTON Building & Zoning Department (206) 235-2550 SHORELINE MASTER APPLICATION • APPLICATION FOR: OFFICE USE ONLY: . Application No. . Sn'1 -C'Y>`,l-g7 III SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT ECF No. : EC--�- 005- g PERMIT _ SEC-TWP-R: I_I CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Date Approved: I_I VARIANCE Date Denied: Publication Date: I_I EXEMPTION Comprehensive Plan: I_I 'REVISION Zoning: Water . Body: STAFF USE ONLY -- ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING J Date ,oN Application Received By: __J vie'/ ( Application Determined To Be:' p (e) L 4'., o Accepted a Incomplete a , JAN 2 71987 "'I Notification Sent On: By ( Initials) : BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. Date Routed: Additional Material Received by: Application Determined To Be: o Accepted o Incomplete . Notification Sent On: By (Initials) : In addition to the information below, the applicant should include a site map and any other pertinent information which will assist in the review of this application. The Building and Zoning Department reserves the right to require additional information needed to evaluate the application. APPLICANT TO PROVIDE INFORMATION REQUIRED IN ITEMS 1-10 THROUGH 14-16 BELOW: INFORMATION: 1. Applicant Owner - X Purchaser Name: Stoneway Concrete, Inc. Lessee Other Mailing Address 1915 Maple Valley Hwy., Renton, wP 98055 Phone: 226-1001 Name;?of Property Owner Stoneway Concrete, Inc. Mailing S . Address 1915 Maple Valley Hwy., Renton, WA 98055 ' Phone: . 226-1001 ._ 3. Contact/ .. . - . . . . .. . . -. -- .... .. . _ -... Consultant: Hugh G. Goldsmith & Associates, Inc. .. . Atten: Dick Padrick Mailing 501 Lyon Bldg. , Seattle, WA.98104 Phone: 622-1080 Address • #• ; PROJECT INFORMATION: 4. General location of proposed' project (give street address if any or , nearest street and intersection) 1915 Maple Valley Highway Renton, Washington 98055 5. Legal Description (if lengthy, attach as separate sheet) : See attached for legal description of applicants property. Fill will be placed in an approximate 50' "x 360' area on the Cedar River Park adjacent to applicants west boundary at the Park Department's request. " 6. Name of adjacent water area or wetlands: Cedar River 7. Current use of property and existing improvements : Concrete Batch Plant'. Improvements include Hatching Plant; Sand, Gravel, and Cement Storage Bins; • Equipment'. Maintenance and Repair Yards and Buildings; Office Building; Paved, Hardstands; Cement Recycling Basin; Concrete Materials Storage Yards. Landscaping[park 8 . PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY and proposed improvements (be specific) : It is proposed to fill approximately 3.5 Acres of the'.applicants:property and 0.4 acres of park property to bring those portion of the sites to the same elevation as the remainder of applicant's sites. No change in use"of property is. anticipated. 9 . Proposed construction costs and schedule: . A. Total construction cost and fair market value of proposed project include additional developments contemplated but not included in this application: Estimated Project Cost is $185,500.00 The land value will not change from its current $10 per square foot. B. Construction dates (month/year) for which permit is requested: Begin Upon issue of annual license End .Approx. 3 to 5 yrs. from start date. 10. List any other permits for this project from state, federal, local governmental agencies or the City of Renton for which you have applied or will apply, including the name of the issuing agency, whether the permit has been applied for, and if so, the date of the application, whether the application was approved or denied and the date of same, and number of the application or permit: .. City of Renton, Master Application - Special Permit for 'Grade and Fill - Concurrent Application with Shoreline Master Application. Annual license for grading and. filling. ' ITEMS 11, 12, AND 13 TO BE COMPLETED BY LOCAL OFFICIAL: 11. NATURE OF THE EXISTING SHORELINE. (Describe type. of shoreline, such as marine, stream, lake, lagoon, marsh, bog, swamp, flood plain, floodway, delta; type of beach, such as accretion, erosion, high bank, low bank, or dike; material, such as sand, gravel, mud, clay, rock, riprap; and extent and type of bulkheading, if any) : 12 . In the event that any of the proposed buildings or structures will exceed a height of thirty-five (35) feet above the average grade level, indicate the approximate location of and number of residential units, existing and potential, that will have an obstructed view. 13 . If the application involves a conditional use or variance, set forth in full that portion of the master program which provides that the proposed use may be a conditional use, or, in the case of a. variance, from which. the variance is being sought. ITEMS 14, 15, AND 16 TO BE PROVIDED BY APPLICANT: 14 . If applying for a variance or a conditional use, complete the variance or conditional use form. N/A 15. Project Maps : Attach to application accurate site plan and vicinity maps. Refer to application instruction handout for map requirements. 16 . Additional information (If necessary, attach as separate sheet) : STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS CITY OF RENTON ) I, Don Merlino , being duly sworn, certify that I am the above-named applicant for a permit to con- struct a substantial development pursuant to the Shoreline Management Act of 1971, and that the foregoing statements, answers, and information are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Signature Subscribed and sworn to me this day of . lf7NUA,f Y1 /.9,7 . Not ry Public in and for the State of Washington. residing at^ 04 FORM 177 MARCH 19, 1984 ORDER NO. 853207 DESCRIPTION: PARCEL A GOVERNMENT LOTS 4 AND 7 AND THAT PORTION, IF ANY, OF GOVERNMENT LOTS 5 AND 6 AND THE SOUTHWEST OF THE NORTHEAST 'g, LYING SOUTHWESTERLY OF THE RENTON-MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY NO. 1140 AND NORTH OF THAT CERTAIN BOUNDARY LINE ESTABLISHED BY PARAGRAPH 10 OF THAT CERTAIN DECREE IN EQUITY ENTERED IN SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY IN CAUSE NO. 90072 ON FEBRUARY 6, 1913, ALL IN SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M.; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF LYING NORTHERLY AND WESTERLY OF A LINE DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: • BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE PACIFIC COAST RAILROAD COM- PANY'S RIGHT-OF-WAY WITH THE CENTER LINE PRODUCED NORTH 81°56' EAST OF FIRST AVENUE NORTH SHOWN AS "COUNTY ROAD" ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF CAR WORKS ADDITION TO RENTON, AS PER PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 15 OF PLATS, ON PAGE 47, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE SOUTH 23°38'45" WEST ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY 38.76 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF A COUNTY ROAD, WHICH POINT IS MARKED BY A CON- CRETE MONUMENT; • THENCE ALONG SAID COUNTY ROAD LINE NORTH 86°12' EAST 99.82 FEET TO A POINT ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT WITH A RADIUS OF 256.48 FEET, WHICH POINT IS IN THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF MAPLE VALLEY ROAD;, THENCE CONTINUING ON SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE ON SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT AND PARALLEL WITH THE CENTER LINE OF SAID MAPLE VALLEY ROAD, A DISTANCE OF 180.45 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID MAPLE VALLEY ROAD LINE SOUTH 41°25' EAST 1,228.45 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF SAID LINE; THENCE SOUTH 47°32'30" WEST 273.25 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88°26'00" WEST 251.95 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 39°24'35" WEST 73.20. FEET; THENCE NORTH 79°04'40" WEST 176.04 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 27°58'20" WEST TO THE BOUNDARY LINE ESTABLISHED BY PARAGRAPH 10 OF THAT CERTAIN DECREE IN EQUITY ENTERED IN SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR-KING COUNTY IN CAUSE NO. 90072 OF FEBRUARY 6, 1913, AND TERMINUS OF SAID LINE; EXCEPT RIGHTS OF THE STATE OF •WASHINGTON IN AND TO THAT PORTION, PAST AND PRESENT, IF ANY, OF THE PROPERTY HEREIN DESCRIBED WHICH LIES BELOW THE LINE OF ORDINARY HIGH WATER OF THE CEDAR RIVER; . AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF LYING NORTHERLY OF THAT CERTAIN BOUNDARY LINE ESTAB- LISHED BY PARAGRAPH 10 OF THAT CERTAIN DECREE OF EQUITY ENTERED IN SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY CAUSE NO. 90072 ON FEBRUARY 6, 1913, AND SOUTHERLY OF THE THREAD OF THE PRESENT CHANNEL OF THE CEDAR RIVER; SITUATE IN. THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. y ` • • • • • • • • • • • PROJECT NARRATIVE The project site is approximately 3. 5 acres of a more than 13 acre concrete batch plant site; and. about 0.4 acres of the City of Renton Cedar River Park. The park site is included in this - application at the request of. the Park and Recreation Department. The Cedar River Park is west and north of the fill . site. The remainder of the concrete batch plant site is east of the fill site. The Cedar River borders the south side of the pro- ject site. Additional public land is south of the Cedar River. Approximately 53 ,000 cubic yards of fill material will be placed in the site during the three to five year life of the project. A silt fence and berm will be placed along the Cedar River during the initial phase of work to provide erosion control for the project. The fill material will be primarily excavated earth from construction projects throughout King County. Some broken concrete may also be placed in the fill. Concrete chunks will be limited in size to 8" in the greatest dimension. No clay material will be placed on Park Department property. The top foot on Park Department property will be top soil suitable for plantings and turf. It is being proposed to operate from 7 :00 AM to 8 :00 PM Monday through Saturday. Saturday operation is especially important during the summer construction season when a large portion of the annual construction output work is accomplished. Work will begin as soon as a permit is issued and will continue on a somewhat regular basis until the site is completely filled. After placement of the erosion control facilities, work will begin on the west of the site and move toward the east. Fill material will be deposited in stock piles for a period of time and then spread and compacted in 8" to 12" lifts or layers. Trucks hauling fill material will arrive at the site from east and west directions on the Maple Valley Highway. Signifi- cant heavy equipment traffic exists on the Maple Valley Highway and the additional truck traffic is expected to have minimal impact on existing traffic. During the construction season there could be an average of six to eight trucks per hour arriv- ing at the site. During the off-season there may be six to eight trucks per day arriving at the site. If •it is anticipated that more than 10 trucks per hour will arrive at the site for more than two consecutive days , the City will be notified. The • fill will be watered as necessary to keep dust from becoming a problem. There is no reasonable way to provide noise mitigation from the equipment during the initial phase of the project. As the Park property fill is completed a fence will be constructed, and existing Park landscaping replaced by the Park and Recrea- tion Department, to help mitigate equipment noise affects on the Park. The site is shown to be in the 100 year flood plain as established by the Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA) insurance rate maps , and its associated documentation. No fill will occur in the floodway. All fill in the flood plain will occur in the floodway fringe. According to the Flood Insurance Study prepared by the Federal Emergency Management Agency in November, 1980 , filling this site will not have any affect on the 100 year flood plain elevation upstream or down- stream from the site. See following table 2 from that report. Cross section I is the location on the Cedar River of the pro- posed project. Flood plain analysis methodology is described in detail in the study. . Additional information is provided in the application docu- ments and in the environmental checklist. . & ASSOCIATE , INC. L.L U U hint lJU' U U MIL Consulting Engineers Surveyors iner 501 Lyon Bui ding SEATTLE. WASHING ION 98av-r DATE Z1 ��7 JOE NO. 66/21* Phone 622.1p80 • ATTENTION i; 14M J ay F_ LI,vO • TO CyyY Ri=,,u7 ,j • S?D i t.M4,1 c uc€-E0-a� fr '�U/tnl,JG z•Q.vil�vr DC07- : �a«s�� r .P�� ; o� ,cam, Z/Zy ? M/ic_ ,9vf I S6(17 . Il • eik17-0,A.1 Ltt4 9 9 C S • Phone • _ WE ARE SENDING YOU l ttached 0 Under separate cover via the following items: • 0 Shop drawings 0 Prints 0 Plans 0 Samples 0 Specifications 0 Copy of letter 0 Change order 0 • COPIES DATE NO. I DESCRIPTION loR!c /it/AL- ,4 i/.Il vr7" Rae t i ciEr7.A.4 F-e32 II Alfoc-r r e-0.-) • P `I �r rRR77{{ J )1 II . � IIII i 't 'r/''� • ' IuII " :C"T THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as dhacked below: ❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted 0 Resubmit copies for approval paler your use ❑ Approved as noted 0 Submit • copies for distribution • ❑ As requested 0 Returned for corrections 0 Return corrected prints ❑ For review and comment 0 • ❑ FOR•BIDS DUE 19 0 PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS II • II If II ii COPY TO �• / DD li SIGNED: NIORMN►1,weirers Gm a•niw I U enclosures are not as noted. kindly notify us at once. `7, -,� o ,-----) CITY CITY OF RENT. _;1N FILE No(s): sp:005 -8'7 O. ®• + BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT C��"co5-Si id/ sm bba 81 'f‘A,T. (v. 0. . MASTER APPLICATION NOTE TO APPLICANT: Since this is a comprehensive application form, only those ' . ,,ems reid e o your specific type of application(s) are to be completed. (Please print or type. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) • APPLICANT .IITYPE OF APPLICATION NAME FEES Stoneway Concrete, Inc. Q REZONE*(FROM TO ) ADDRESS - ' 1915 Maple Valley Highway 0 SPECIAL.PERMIT* CITY ZIP g® TEMPORARY PERMIT*" Renton, WA: -9 8 0 5 5 cotiornONAL USE PERMIT* TELEPHONE EJ SITE PLAN APPROVAL En SPECIAL PERMIT FOR GRADE AND FILL 226-1001 :$396i7,5 No. of Cubic Yards: ;53,,:000,=-- . VARIANCE* CONTACT PERSON From Section: 1 * Justification Required 1 NAME Hugh G. Goldsmith & Assoc., Inc.-Dick PadriLck ADDRESS SUBDIVISIONS: N/A ' • 501 Lyon Building Q SHORT PLAT CITY • ZIP Q TENTATIVE PLAT • Seattle 98104° El PRELIMINARY PLAT TELEPHONE Q FINAL PLAT 622-1080 D WAIVER (Justification Required) OWNER NO. OF LOTS: 'NAME STONEWAY CONCRETE, INC. PLAT NAME: [AND CITY_OE, RENTO •PARK DEPARTMENT] 1 . ADDRESS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: j 1915 MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY [::] PRELIMINARY N/A CITY ZIP FINAL RENTON 98055 P.U.D. NAME: TELEPHONE 226-1001 0 Residential 0 Industrial ' Commercial U Mixed • LOCATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: PROPERTY ADDRESS N/A 1915 Maple Valley Hwy. , Renton, TATA 98055 0 TENTATIVE EXISTING USE I, PRESENT_ZONING PRELIMINARY � FINAL Batch Plant [and. Renton Park]1 H-1 [and1'P-1] PROPOSED USE Continue existing__Stoneway, PARK NAME: Concrete,batch plant-use and_existing:C,ed'ar. River Park 1-andsc'auinQ:i.`' - - - .. - NUMBER OF SPACES: ® ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE /�$. 7 8...551 SQ. FT ACRES AREA: 18,006 0.40 [,Park] TOTAL FEES" _.$47s.3.0 1. 151,200 3.47 'Stonewav ' STAFF USE ONLY -- ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING • ‘^ CITY OF REM u DA El y l fel (� tq� APPLICATION :::EO BY: LA/kq I { q �s91 1�� ITI ejLA-le: APPLICATION D BE: o 1, - JINN 2 ,�Se7 .19 • CE Accepted • • v � Incomplete Notification Sent On • By: . ' } (Initials) GUILDINC/ZONI . (3 ©gPT. DATE ROUTED • , ADDITIONAL MATERIAL RECEIVED BY: • APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: ' 2-- 3 —8 Q Accepted QIncomplete Notification Sent On By: . - (Initials) ROUTED TO:' • ' MI Building tI Design Eng. un Fire Parks •' • • .rn Police WA Policy Dev. MI Traffic Eng. Utilities "off • RRVTGRn l_7'1_un 7 2 Legal description of property (if more space is required, attach a separate sheet). • See Attached, for Stoneway Legal. Park property is approximately 50' x 360' on west .boundary of Stoneway site. • • AFFIDAVIT DON MERLINO , being duly sworn, declare that I am [authorized representative to act for the property owner, owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS DAY . OF .j)itIt,4,ey 19 NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, RESIDING AT �S'L'74 77Z_£ (Name of Notary. Public) (Signature of Owner) 1915 Maple Valley Highway (Address) (Address) . Renton, WA 98055 (City) (State).,, (Zip). ; 226-1001 (Telephone) Acceptance of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete application. Plans and other materials required to constitute a complete application are listed in the "Application Procedure." Form #174 . PROJECT NARRATIVE The project site is approximately 3. 5 acres of a more than 13 acre concrete batch plant site; and about 0. 4 acres of the City of Renton Cedar River Park. The park site is included in this application at the request of the Park and Recreation Department. The Cedar River Park is west and north of the fill ' site. The • remainder of the concrete batch plant site is east of the ' , fill site. The Cedar River borders the south side of the pro- ject site. Additional public land is south of the Cedar River. Approximately 53 ,000 cubic yards of fill material will be placed in the site during the three to five year life of the project. A silt fence and berm will be placed along the Cedar River during the initial phase of work to provide erosion control for the project. The fill material will be primarily excavated earth from construction projects throughout King County. Some' broken concrete may also be placed in the fill. Concrete chunks will be limited in size to 8" in the greatest dimension. No clay material will be placed on Park Department property. The top foot on Park Department property will be top soil suitable for plantings and turf. It is being proposed to operate from 7:00 AM to 8 :00 PM Monday through Saturday. Saturday operation is especially important during the summer construction season when a large portion of the annual construction output work is 'accomplished. Work ' will begin as soon as a permit is issued and will continue on a somewhat regular basis until the site is completely filled. After placement of the erosion control facilities, work will begin on the west of the site and move toward the east. Fill material will be deposited in stock piles for a period of time' and then spread and compacted in 8" to 12" lifts or layers. Trucks hauling fill material will arrive at the site from east and west directions on the Maple Valley Highway. Signifi- cant heavy equipment traffic exists on the Maple Valley Highway and the additional truck traffic is expected to have minimal impact on existing traffic. During the construction season there could be an average of six to eight trucks per hour arriv- ing at the site. During the off-season there may be six to . eight trucks per day arriving at the site. If it is anticipated that more than 10 trucks per hour will arrive at the site for more than two consecutive days , the City will be notified. The fill will be watered as necessary to keep dust from becoming a problem. There is no reasonable way to provide noise mitigation from the equipment during the initial phase of the project. As the Park property fill is completed a fence will be constructed, and existing Park landscaping replaced by the Park and Recrea- tion Department , to help mitigate equipment noise affects on the Park. . The site is shown to be in the 100 year flood, plain as established by the Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA) insurance rate maps , and its associated documentation. No fill will occur in the floodway.' All fill in the flood plain will occur in the floodway fringe. According to the Flood Insurance Study prepared by the Federal Emergency Management Agency in November, 1980 , filling this site will not have any affect on the 100 year flood plain elevation upstream or down- stream from the, site. ' See following table 2 from that report. Cross section I is the location on the Cedar River of the. pro- posed project. Flood plain analysis methodology is described in detail in the study. ' Additional information is provided, in the application docu- ments and in the environmental checklist. . • :1)) a ®; CITY OF RENTON AA 6°9""24.6'-' l PARKS and RECREATION-- . .., Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor John E. Webley, Dir,..'•�4:44 0 vosso January 20, 1987 . �ij rririT'! .11 11 11111T5014 1�87 S t tkit: ►3 Mr. Richard Padrick 31)%� -- I IliNEs1;116 501 Lyon Building i.X� `� T T Seattle, WA 98104 6 . Dear Richard: ,EIT+ f( • After reviewing your proposal with staff and landscape architects currently und:r contract to the City for the community center project in Cedar River Park, we live ^ON come up with the following concerns: 11`k;. 1) The filling of the Stoneway property would adversely affect the park from a visual and noise standpoint if the existing use is maintained. The large `""" berm and its attendant landscaping between the Carco Theatre and Stoneway property was installed to help mitigate these problems. 2) ; The filling of the Cedar River flood plain could adversely affect downstream ; properties (including the park) in the event of a flood. We would like addi- tional information from a, hydrologis.t concerning this potential problem. 3) The short term traffic increase required to haul in fill material should be addressed (i.e. , routes, times, days, etc.) . - If Stoneway is allowed to fill the proposed 3.5 acres, our concerns include- mitigation of the following: 1) The depression created between Stoneway and the Carco Theatre (park land) should be filled with clean, free-draining material with the final 12 inches being top soil suitable for plantings and turf. 2) The landscape materials currently in place that would be covered with fill should be replaced. Material should be of the same size. 3) Heavy landscaping should be installed along the property line to help mitigate the negative impacts of increased noise and aesthetics deterioration due to the use of the site. We would be pleased to work with you on the matter of plant material. 4) We would also like to review and work with you on fencing, irrigation, drainage, and proposed construction schedule if your proposal is successful. If you have any questions or comments, please call me at 235-2560. Sincerely, ��L✓ram Sam Chastain Parks Superintendent 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2560 si • BASE FLOOD FLOODING SOURCE FLOODWAY WATER SURFACE ELEVATION SECTION MEAN WITHOUT WITH INCREASE CROSS SECTION DISTANCE1 WIDTH AREA VELOCITY REGULATORY FLOODWAY I FLOODWAY (FEET) (SQUARE (FEET PER FEET) SECOND) (FEET NGVD) Cedar River A 0.025 158 1280 7.7 15.0 15.0 ' 15.0 0.0 B 0.462 144 180 10.0 18.9 18.9 18.9 ' 0.0 C 0.767 157 1510 6.5 23.7 23.7 23.7 0.0 D 1.144 156 1020 9.6 25.7 25.7 25.7 0.0 E 1.261 120 950 . 10.3 27.5 27.5 27.5 0.0 +t F 1.337 135 1030 9.5 28.5 28.5 28.5 0.0 -v G 1.489 150 1110 8.8 30.6 30.6 30.6 0.0 H 1.679 114 950 10.3 32.5 32.5 32.5 0.0 I 1.830 135 1180 8.3 35.5 35.5 35.5 0.0 J 1.960 221 1360 7.2 37.3 37.3 37.3 0.0 K - 2.038 135 1280 7.7 38.4 38.4 38.4 0.0 L _ 2.090 115 1210 8.1 39.5 39.5 39.5- 0.0 M 2.160 103 1160 8.5 40.7 40.7 40.7 0.0 N 2.320 110 1490 6.6 43.4 43.4 43.4 0.0 O 2.470 142 1500 6.5 45.2 45.2 45.2 0.0 P 2.730 141 1210 8.1 49.5 49.5 49.5 0.0 Q 2.900 130 1310 7.5 52.6 52.6 52.6 0.0 R 2.960 140 1220 8.1 53.6 53.6 53.6 0.0 S 3.020 150 1070 9.1 55.4 55.4 55.4 0.0 T 3.250 210 , 1690 5.8 60.9 60.9 61.0 0.1 U 3.370 196 1310 7.5 62.8 62.8 62.9 0.1 A. 1Mi1es Above Mouth FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY FLOODWAY DATA A a Federal Insurance Administration °° CITY OF RENTON, WA rn N (KING CO.) CEDAR RIVER IR w F • . dF . R4,� . ECF• : I CCC-co5-21 I �•�, o • LU: 5P-005-6-1 • $y o z • City of Renton Lrn - �a-Si Z ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 041 7' fD Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43,21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for allproposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impacts. • Use of Checklist for Nonproject Proposals: (Please Type or Print Legibly) Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as-"proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND CITY OF RENTON 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: ETE Ill Grading and Filling for Stoneway Concrete, Inc. .-, JAN 2 7 198 2. Name of applicant: Stoneway Concrete, Inc. • BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact.person: Applicant: Contact Person: 1915 Maple Valley Highway Hugh G. Goldsmith & Associates, Inc. Renton, WA 98055 501 Lyon Building 226-1001 Seattle, ,WA 98104 4. Date checklist prepared: Attn: Dick Padrick 622-1080 - . 18 November 1986 . 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton Building and Zoning Department 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Begin construction upon issue of Special Permit and Annual License. The current plan is to complete the project within three to five years. ,41 7. 'Do you have any plans fo. ;..ture additions, expansions, or furtnoa` activity related to or connected with this proposal? if Yes. explain. . Upon completion of the Grade and Fill Project, the existing use will continue. Existing use on applicant's property, is primarily bulk storage of concrete products such as..pipe and large blocks and • storage of sand and aggregates for batching 'concrete. The finished site may alsc be used for overnight parking of concrete and gravel trucks. Existing use-on,park 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will property be prepared, directly related to this proposal. is land- scaping. None ' .:.. . 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other' proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. A portion of the project includes placing fill on Cedar River Park. property. . The Park Department is planning construction of a multi-use recreation facility northwest of the fill project. A building permit will be required for recreation 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, facility. if known. This application is for a Special Permit for Grade and Fill and a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit. - 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Project is to fill approximately 3.47 Acres of the Owner's site with approximately 53,000 cubic yards of material, to bring this project site up to the existing grade of the remainder of Owner's site. Site area is approximately 13.2 Acres. Proposed use is to continue existing use. See 7. above. The project is also to fill approximately 0.4 acres of 'the Cedar River Park, with approximately 1,000 cubic yards of material. Proposed park use is to continue existing use. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. . If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site,plan, vicinity map, and topography map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to, this checklist. Street Address 'of Project Area: 1915 Maple Valley Hwy. Renton, Wa. 98055 • For Legal Description of applicant's property, see attached. Fill on Park property will be roughly 50 feet by 360 feet along the west boundary of applicant's property. , B. • ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS EARTH ' a.' • • ' General description of . the site (circle one); flat rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other a.. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? ±396 across site. Concrete walls exist at some property lines. c. 'What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, caly, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. • USDA Soil Survey ,Classification Rh. Soil includes sand, gravel and riverwash materials. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No. Vertical and near vertical cuts were made when constructing the Maple Valley Highway in the vicinity of the site. - 2 - e. Describe the purpose. type. and'approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source_of fill. __The site is being filled to bring • it to the same grade asLLthe. remainder of Owner's adjacent property. Fill will be non-biodegradable construction debris (earth and small chunks of portland cement concrete [pcc]) . Approx. 53,000 c.y. of material will be req'.d. f. Could erosion occur as -a result of clearing, construction. or use? If so. generally describe. . • Yes.' Erosion could occur if rainfall occurs during construction of the fill. Erosion control facilities will be constructed at the ' - beginning of the project. See B..l.h. g. , About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Most of the site will be covered with coarse aggregate. A portion of the site will be paved with AC or PCC. Existing vegetation adjacent to the Cedar River will remain. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: A filter cloth fence will be constructed at the downstream end of the fill area. The steeper slope adjacent to the river will be hydroseeded upon completion of construction. 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. • . 1) Dust from moving construction vehicles. 2). Diesel exhaust ,from construction vehicles Quantities are not known. b. Are there any off-site sources of emission? Yes, traffic on SR 169 is an off-site source of emission. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any:. Ordinary emission control• equipment is installed on construction equipment. Fill will be watered if necessary to control dust. No extraordinary emission control measures are expected to be needed. 3. WATER a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate. state what stream or river it flows into. Yes, the Project Area has a 450 foot frontage on the Cedar River. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Yes. The project is adjacent to the Cedar River. Project plans have been submitted with applications. 3) • Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. • None. ' -'3 - 4) . Will, the proposal require surface water.withdrawals or diversions? Give general description. purpose, and approximately quantities if known. -No J 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the_site plan. According to FEMA maps, a.large portion of the site is within _ the 100 yr. flo pla odin. No fill will occur in the-floodway. All fill in the flood plain will occur in the floodway fringe. Approximately 13,300 C.Y. of material will be placed in the floodway fringe. , 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste 'materials to surface waters? If so. describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be. discharged to ground water? Give general. description, purpose, and appaoximately quantities if known. No site use water will be discharged. to ground water. Storm water may percolate to ground water in site locations not covered with impervious material. It is expected that surface water from the project site, which reaches the ground water aquifer, will be improved because it must travel through an additional 10 feet of clean compacted earth. 2) Describe .waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals . . .; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. • N/A • c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Storm water will run off site and discharge to, the Cedar River. This is not a change from the existing site condition. It is not intended to collect the surface runoff. • 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. . No . • • • - 4 - T '' • d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: . Erosion control.measures•will be constructed and maintained during the filling and grading operations.. No impact reductions will be required during site use. An approximately 50' width of the site • adjacent to the Cedar River will be hydroseeded to stabilize the • slope and to provide a biofilter for storm water runoff. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: ® deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other o evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other a Shrubs u grass o crop or grain o Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other o water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other O other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Portions of existing vegetation on Park property will be • removed and saved for replanting after the fill work is completed. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None d. • Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Hydroseed the fill slope along the shoreline of the Cedar River. Plant ivy along the fence installed along the applicant's property line. 5. Animals a. Circle,any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds;.-H�wk -hero %eagle,\ gb d other Mammals:Lde r b ar, elk, beaver, other Fish: bass, sa mon trout, herring, shellfish, other None of th se were observed on the site but are expected to be in the vicinity. b. .List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None C. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No - 5 - • d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: . None - 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. N/A • b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No ' v c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List Other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: None 7. Environmental Health • a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including .exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None • 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: • None b. Noise • 1) • What types of noise'exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? , Operation of Stoneway Concrete Batch Plant including cement, concrete • and sand and gravel -truck traffic. Traffic noise on SR 169 adjacent to the site. •v ` • 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic. construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Short term, construction equipment during course of grading. Hours of operation are estimated to be 7 AM to 8 PM, Monday through Saturday. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None 8. Land and Shoreline Use • a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Site is currently used to temporarily store concrete products (pipe, vaults, blocks) . Adjacent west and north is the City of Renton Cedar River Park. Adjacent east is the remainder of the concrete batch plant. Adjacent south is the Cedar River. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No • • c. Describe any structures on the site. Several concrete material storage bins exist on the site. One vacant sheet metal building exists on the site. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Yes. The sheet metal building would be demolished, and disposed of at an approved site and/or recycled. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Applicant's site is zone Heavy Industrial. Park site is zoned Public Use. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Applicant's site is designated Commercial. Park site is designated Park. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Urban Environment h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? 'If so, specify. No i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? . Possibly 5 to 10 different workers would work in the vicinity of the finished,project, intermittently. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None . k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: N/A - 7 - �• 1. Proposed measurs ea ensure the proposal is compatible-with existing and ' ' , projected land uses and plans, if any: '_- ' • None - Project is continuation of existing conforming uses. • • 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if' any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. N/A b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. N/A' c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: N/A 10. Aesthetics ' a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. N/A b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Stored concrete products may be more visible from adjacent park and from Maple Valley Highway. • c. Pro posed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: A 6 foot fence with ivy on the west property line will significantly - mitigate any view -impact. A 6 foot fence with ivy, and 4-5' douglas firs at 15' centers, along the north property line, will mitigate view impact from the north. 11. Light and Glare , a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? N/A b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? N/A c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? N/A , d. Proposed measures'to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: N/A • - 8 - . 12. Recreation , , a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Cedar River Park is adjacent to the west and north site property .lines. Cedar River._is,adjacent south. �. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. • V No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Landscaping exists on Cedar River Park adjacent to • project site west boundary. A fence will be constructed_ on Applicant's west _and north property lines to screen site use from view. • 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation • a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. • NOV • b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: N/A 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. SR 169 provides site access. Access. to project. from SR 169 will be via Stoneway Batch.Plant property. . (Project site and batch plant are on single parcel under one ownership) . b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximately distance to the nearest transit stop? N/A ;•• c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? • N/A • • d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). • No • • • - 9 - e. Will the project I. - (or occur in the immediate vicinit, :,f) water, rail, or • t air transportation? If so, generally describe. - • , No f: How many vehicular trips per.day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. N/A g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: N/A 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for .example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. N/A 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: !electricity„natural gas,' watei efuse servic Ateiephonanitary sewer septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. None C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw, any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: A Name Printed: DON MERLINO - 10 - #176 11-8-84 :" -4 . • • • • MARCH 19, 1984 ORDER NO. 853207 DESCRIPTION: • • PARCEL A GOVERNMENT LOTS 4 AND 7 AND THAT PORTION, IF ANY, OF GOVERNMENT LOTS 5 AND 6 AND THE SOUTHWEST OF THE NORTHEAST 4, LYING SOUTHWESTERLY OF THE RENTON-MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY NO. 1140 AND NORTH OF THAT CERTAIN BOUNDARY LINE ESTABLISHED BY PARAGRAPH 10 OF THAT CERTAIN DECREE IN EQUITY ENTERED IN SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY IN CAUSE NO. 90072 ON FEBRUARY 6, 1913, ALL IN SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M.; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF LYING NORTHERLY AND WESTERLY OF A LINE DESCRIBED AS • FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE PACIFIC COAST RAILROAD COM- PANY'S RIGHT-OF-WAY WITH THE CENTER LINE PRODUCED NORTH 81°56' EAST OF FIRST AVENUE NORTH SHOWN AS "COUNTY ROAD" ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF CAR WORKS ADDITION TO RENTON, AS PER PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 15 OF PLATS, ON PAGE 47, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE SOUTH 23°38'45" WEST ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY 38.76 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF A COUNTY ROAD, WHICH POINT IS MARKED BY A CON- CRETE MONUMENT; THENCE ALONG SAID COUNTY ROAD LINE NORTH 86°12' EAST 99.82 FEET TO A POINT ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT WITH A RADIUS OF 256.48 FEET, WHICH POINT IS IN THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF MAPLE VALLEY ROAD; ' THENCE CONTINUING ON SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE ON SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT AND PARALLEL WITH THE CENTER LINE OF SAID MAPLE VALLEY ROAD, A DISTANCE OF 180.45 FEET; • THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID MAPLE VALLEY ROAD LINE SOUTH 41°25' EAST 1,228.45 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF SAID LINE; THENCE SOUTH 47°32'30" WEST 273.25 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88°26'00" WEST 251.95 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 39°24'35" WEST 73.20 FEET; THENCE NORTH 79°04'40" .WEST 176.04 FEET; THENCE SOUTH. 27°58'20" WEST TO THE BOUNDARY LINE ESTABLISHED BY PARAGRAPH 10 OF THAT CERTAIN DECREE IN EQUITY ENTERED IN SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY IN CAUSE NO. 90072 OF FEBRUARY 6, 1913, AND TERMINUS OF SAID LINE; EXCEPT RIGHTS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND TO THAT PORTION, PAST AND PRESENT, IF ANY, OF THE PROPERTY HEREIN DESCRIBED WHICH LIES BELOW THE LINE OF ORDINARY HIGH WATER OF THE CEDAR RIVER; ' AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF LYING NORTHERLY OF THAT CERTAIN BOUNDARY LINE ESTAB- LISHED BY PARAGRAPH 10 OF THAT CERTAIN DECREE OF EQUITY ENTERED IN SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY CAUSE NO. 90072 ON FEBRUARY 6, 1913, AND SOUTHERLY OF THE THREAD OF THE PRESENT CHANNEL OF THE CEDAR RIVER; SITUATE IN THE CITY. OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. • • • • SUMMARY OF ERRORS AND SPECIAL NOTES CAUTION SECNO= 62.000 PROFILE= 1 HYDRAULIC JUMP D.S. CAUTION SECNO= 62.000 PROFILE= 2 HYDRAULIC JUMP D.S. CAUTION SECNO= 62.000 PROFILE= 3 HYDRAULIC JUMP D.S. CAUTION -SECNO= 62.000 PROFILE= 4 HYDRAULIC JUMP D.S. 1 04/20/87 14:04109 PAGE 1 THIS RUN EXECUTED 04/20/87 14:04:10 ###***XXXXU XXXXX*XXXXXXXXXXXXXX ********XXXX#*### HEC2 RELEASE DATED NOV 76 UPDATED MAY 1984 ERROR CORR - 01,02,03,04,05,06 MODIFICATION - 50,51,52,53,54,55,56 IBM-PC-XT VERSION ****************XXXX*H*************XXXX********** B:\}*dir Bad command or file name B:\}dir Volume in drive B has no label Directory of B:\ CEDAR FLD 18022 4-16-87 5:57p CEDAR INP 17590 4-16-87 5:49p CEDARINP OUT 191430 4-20-87 2:04p CEDAR EN 18304 4-20-87 1:06p CEDAR NEN 18432 4-20-87 1:05p 5 File(s) 97280 bytes free 6541,000 ,00 25.00 .00 5460,00 .00 5460,00 .00 709,59 7,69 .00 ,00 6541,000 ,00 25.00 .00 7580.00 .00 7580,00 .00 885.70 8.56 .00 .00 6541,000 40 25.00 .00 8530.00 .00 8530,00 .00 994.32 8.58 .40 40 6541,000 .00 25,00 .00 10900.00 .00 10900,00 .00 1220.17 8.93 .00 .00 6681,000 45.00 25,00 45,00 5460+00 .00 5460.00 .00 676,94 8,07 ,00 .00 6681,000 45,00 25,00 45,00 7580,00 .00 7580.00 40 843,70 8.98 .00 .00 6681,000 45,00 25.00 45,00 8530.00 .00 8530+00 .40 942.48 9.05 .00 40 6681,000 45,00 25,00 45.00 10900,00 40 10900,00 .00 1146,73 9,51 .00 .00 6921,000 45,00 25,00 45,00 -5460,00 40 5460.00 40 812.67 6,72 40 .00 6921.000 45,00 25,00 45,00 7580,00 .00 7580.00 .00 981,08 7.73 .00 ►00 6921.000 45,00 25,00 45.00 8530.00 .00 8530.00 .00 1067.73 7,99 40 .00 6921,000 45,00 25.00 45.00 10900,00 .00 10900,00 .00 1256.45 8,68 .00 .00 6931,000 45,00 30.00 45,00 5460,00 .00 5460,00 40 804,66 6,79 40 .00 6931,000 45,00 3040 45,00 7580,00 40 7580.00 .00 968,86 7.82 .00 .00 6931,000 45,00 30,00 45,00 8530.00 .00 8530.00 .00 1053.38 8.10 .00 .00 6931,000 45.00 30,00 45,00 10900.00 40 10900.00 .00 1223,90 8,91 40 .40 1 04/20/87 13:53:44 PAGE 62 SECHO K*XHL • K#XHCH K*XHR G . GLOB QCH GROB AREA UCH STEEL STENCR 6973,000 45,00 30.00 45,00 5460,00 40 546040 40 814,70 6.70 .00 40 J 6973,000 45,00 30,00 45,00 7580,00 ,00 7580,00 .00 981,38 7,72 .00 .00 6973,000 45,00 30+00 45.00 8530,00 .00 8530.00 .00 1065,67 8.00 .00 . 40 6973.000 45.00 30.00 45.00 10900,00 .00 10900,00 .00 1226.24 8.89 .00 .00 6983,000 45.00 25.00 45.00 5460.00 .00 5460,00 .00 830.02 6.58 .00 .00 6983,000 45.00 25.00 . 45,00 7580,00 .00 7580,00 .00 1003,65 7,55 .00 +00 6983,000 45.00 25,00 45.00 8530,00 .00 8530.00 40 1090,72 7,82 .00 .00 6983.000 45,00 25,00 45.00 10900,00 40 10900.00 .00 1303,63 8.36 .00 .00 7103,000 45,00 25,00 45.00 5460,00 40 5460,00 40 698,68 7,81 .00 .00 7103,000 45.00 25,00 45+00 7580.00 .00 7575,72 4.28 891.12 8,54 .00 .00 7103,000 45,00 25,00 45,00 8530,00 40 8520,45 9,55 989,83 8,67 .40 .00 7103,000 45,00 25,00 45.00 10900,00 .00 10875,97 24,03 1236.32 8,89 .00 .00 7483,000 45,00 20.00 45,00 5460,00 ,00 5460.00 40 677,36 8,06 ,00 .00 7483.000 45,00 20.00 45.00 7580,00 ,00 7580,00 .00 846,17 8,96 .00 .00 7483,000 45,00 20.00 45.00 8530,00 .00 8530,00 .00 929.47 9,18 .00 .04 7483,000 45.00 20.00 45,00 10900.00 .00 10900.00 40 1138,43 9.57 ,04 .00 7643,000 45,00 28,00 45,00 5460.00 .00 5460,00 .00 616.59 8.86 .00 .00 - 7643,000 45,00 28,00 45,00 7580,00 .00 7580,00 .00 754,38 10,05 .40 .00 7643,000 45.00 28,00 45,00 8530+00 .00 8530,00 .40 821.28 10.39 .00 .40 7643,000 45.00 28,00 45.00 10900,00 .00 10900,00 .00 999.99 10,90 .40 .00 7653.000 45.00 35,00 45.00 5460.00 .40 5460,00 40 605,25 9,02 .00 .00 7653,000 45,00 35,00 45.00 7580,00 .00 7580,00 .00 735,03 10.31 .00 .00 7653,000 45,00 35,00 45,00 8530+00 .00 8530.00 .00 797,56 10,70 .00 .00 7653.000 45.00 35.00 45.00 10900.00 .00 10900.00 .00 963.66 11.31 ,00 .00 7725,000 45,00 25.00 45.00 5460.00 .00 5460.00 .40 646,78 8,44 .00 .00 7725.000 45,00 25.00 45,00 7580.00 .00 7580.00 .00 781.29 9,70 .00 .00 7725,000 45,00 25.00 45,00 8530.00 .00 8530.00 .00 851,98 10.01 .00 .00 7725,000 45.00 25.00 45,00 10900,00 .00 10900.00 .00 1014.47 10.74 .00 .00 7735+000 45,00 25,00 45.00 5460,00 .00 5460.00 .00 678.04 8.05 .00 40 7735,000 45.00 25,00 45,00 7580,00 .00 7580.00 .00 832.95 9,10 .00 .00 7735,000 45,00 25,00 45,00 8530+00 40 8530,00 .00 914,47 9,33 .00 40 7845.000 45,00 25,00 45,00 5460.00 .00 5460.00 .00 711.83 7.67 .00 ,00 7845,000 45.00 25,00 45,00 7580,00 .00 7580,00 .00 916.62 8.27 .00 .00 7845.000 45.00 25,00 45.00 8530,00 .00 8530.00 .00 1016.67 8.39 .00 .00 7845.000 45.00 25,00 45.00 10900.00 .00 10900.00 .00 1249,41 8.72 .00 .00 8002.000 .00 25.00 .00 5460.00 .00 5460,00 .00 735.16 7.43 .00 .00 8002.000 40 25.00 ,00 7580.00 .00 7580.00 .00 943,73 8.03 .00 .00 8002,000 .00 25.00 ,00 8530.00 .00 8530.00 .00 1043.44 8,17 .00 .00 8002.000 .00 25,00 .00 10900,00 .00 10900.00 .00 1276,20 8,54 .00 .00 1 04/20/87 13:53:44 PAGE 63 SECNO K*XNL K*XNCH X*XNR Q QLOB QCH QR08 AREA VCH ST£NCL STENCR 8092,000 45,00 30,00 45.00 5460,00 .00 5460.00 .00 654,13 8,35 .00 .00 8092.000 45.00 30.00 45.00 7580.00 .00 7580.00 .00 838.16 9.04 .00 .00 8092.000 45,00 30,00 45.00 8530.00 ,00 8530.00 .00 926.62 9.21 .00 .00 8092,000 45,00 30,00 45.00 10900,00 180,00 10720.00 .00 1250.51 9,44 .00 .00 8402.000 45.00 25.00 45.00 5460.00 .00 5460,00 .00 712.64 7,66 .00 ,00 8402.000 45.00 25,00 45.00 7580.00 .00 7580,00 40 897.55 8.45 .00 .00 8402.000 45.00 25.00 45.00 8530.00 .00 8530.00 .00 976,39 8.74 .00 ,00 8402.000 45,00 25,00 45.00 10900.00 ,00 10900.00 .00 1150.98 9,4.7 .00 .00 8436.000 .00 25,00 .00 5460.00 .00 5460,00 ,00 732.81 7.45 .00 .00 8436.000 ,00 25.00 .00 7580.00 .00 7580.00 .00 922.31 8.22 .00 .00 8436,000 .00 25,00 .00 8530.00 .00 8530.00 ,00 1002,84 8.51 .00 .00 8436.000 .00 25.00 .00 10900,00 .00 10900,00 .00 1182.91 9.21 .00 .00 8476.000 45,00 25.00 45,00 5460.00 .00 5460.00 .00 656.65 8.31 .00 .00 8476.000 45.00 25,00 45.00 7580.00 ,00 7580,00 .00 812.37 9,33 .00 .00 8476.000 45.00 25,00 45.00 8530.00 .00 8530.00 .00 879,30 9.70 .00 .00 8476.000 45.00 25.00 45.00 10900.00 .00 10900.00 .00 1032.64 10.56 .00 40 8596.000 50.00 35,00 40,00 5460.00 ,00 5460.00 .00 906,87 6,02 .00 .00 8596,000 50.00 35,00 40.00 7580,00 .00 7579.87 .13 1168.15 6,49 .00 .00 8596,000 50.00 35.00 40.00 8530.00 .00 8527,39 2.61 1279.24 6,68 .00 .00 8596.000 50,00 35,00 40.00 10900,00 15,12 10852.02 32,87 1553.78 7,12 .00 .00 8836.000 50,00 35.00 40.00 5460,00 .00 5460,00 .00 850.20 6.42 .00 .00 8836.000 50.00 35,00 40,00 7580.00 .00 7580.00 .00 1119.87 6.77 .00 .00 8836.000 50,00 35.00 40,00 8530.00 ,00 8530,00 .00 1234.39 6.91 .00 .00 8836.000 50.00 35,00 40.00 10900,00 ,00 10866.79 33,21 1528.74 7.26 .00 .00 X 9446,000 50.00 44.00 50,00 5460.00 .00 5460,00 .00 784,12 6.96 .00 .00 J 9446.000 50.00 44.00 50,00 7580.00 ,00 7579.59 .41 948.24 8.00 .00 .00 iv 9446.000 50,00 44.00 50.00 8530.00 .00 8519.50 10.49 1026,93 jliz. .00 .00 ti 9446.000 50.00 44,00 50.00 10900,00 .00 10785.70 114,30 1224.04 9.14 .00 ,00 10236.000 50.00 44.00 50,00 5460.00 .00 5460,00 .00 898.37 6.08 .00 .00 )` 10236.000 50.00 44.00 50.00 7580,00 .00 7580.00 .00 1115.37 6.80 .00 .00 10236.000 50.00 44,00 50,00 8530.00 to ,04 8530.00 .00 1204.83 .1.621 .00 .00 69 10236,000 50,00 44.00 50.00 10900.00 .00 10900.00 .00 1412.05 7,72 .00 .00 11156.000 50.00 44.00 50.00 5460.00 .00 5460.00 ,00 799.17 6.83 .00 .00 11156.000 50.00 44,00 50.00 7580,00 .00 7564,67 15.33 976.58 7.88 ,00 .00 11156.000 50.00 44.00 50.00 8530.00 .00 8456.63 73.37 1069.51 8,26 .00 .00 11156.000 50,00 44.00 50,00 10900,00 ,05 10522.73 377.22 1321.94 8.98 .00 .00 1 04/20/87 13:53:44 PAGE 64 **-**t**+***** ********F****** *iFiF#i*** *******14 HF1E*************************** * WATER SURFACE PROFILES RUN DATE 04/20/87 TIME 13:53:41 * ****************************************************** *************************************; IN'Du"' c ..E : CEDAR AMP C14%M 1-111.A. VERS10N - WO Ca1p►? ES CITY OF !!TON f;C1 I- VI D L.n X x XXxxxxx xxxxx xxxxxL APR 2 31987 X X X X X X x x x x x x . _.. ,_.. . .... .. . :TT. XXXXXXX XXXX X XXXXX XXXXX X X X X X X X X X X X X X XXXXXXX XXXXX XXXXXXX 1 04/20/87 13:53:44 PAGE 1 THIS RUN EXECUTED 04/20/87 13:53:45 ************************************************** HEC2 RELEASE DATED NOV 76 UPDATED MAY 1984 ERROR CORR - 01,02,03,04,05,0E MODIFICATION - 50,51,52,53,54,55,5E IBM-PC-XT VERSION ************************************************* C T1 RENTON FIS - SEPT 198E - 91998930 T2 MULTIPLE PROFILE RUN T3 CEDAR RIVER-10 YR FLOW J1 ICHECK INQ NINV IDIR STRT METRIC HVINS A WSEL Fl? 0. 2. 0. 0. '003000 ,00 .0 5460. 14.000 .000 J2 NPROF IPLOT PRFVS XSECV XSECH FH ALLDC IBW CHNIM 'TRACE 1.000 .000 -1.000 .000 .000 .000 .000 ,000 .000 .000 J3 VARIABLE CODES FOR SUMMARY PRINTOUT 38.000 39.000 4.000 3.000 42.000 2.000 1.000 53.000 21.000 22.000 54.000 5.000 .000 38.000 1E.000 17,000 18.000 43.000 13.000 14,000 15.000 25.000 26.000 27.000 28.000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 NC .035 .035 .025 .300 1.000 .000 .000 .000 ,000 .000 LAKE WASHINGTON X1 .100 24.000 30.400 190.900 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 X3 10.000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 22.700 22.700 .000 GR 19.300 .000 19,300 13.800 18.600 20.300 17.400 30.400 14.900 33.900 GR 14,200 35.300 11.000 42.300 10.400 46,300 9,500 51.300 10.200 70.300 OR 8.500 80.300 9.500 95.300 9.000 105.300 8.300 115.300 7.400 125.300 GR 9.40U 18Y.300 14.1UO MYU.3UU 18,YUO 1YU,YUU 1Yd UU f f.LUU .UUU ,vuv NC .000 .000 .400 .300 .500 .400 .000 .000 .000 .000 SB 1.250 1,500 3,000 .400 160,000 8,000 1495,000 .000 8.900 8.900 U/S END OF NORTH BOEING BRIDGE X1 62.000 .000 .000 .000 62,000 62.000 62.000 .400 .000 .000 X2 .000 .400 1,000 18.700 22.700 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 ' X3 10.000 .000 .000 .000 400 .400 .000 22,700 22,700 .000 BT 2,000 .400 22,700 .000 237,200 22,700 .000 .000 .000 .000 1 04/20/87 13;53a44 PAGE 2 Xl 892.000 33,000 107,500 260,800 840.000 830.000 830,000 .000 .000 .000 • GR 18,900 .000 19,400 45,900 19,300 73,400 19,400 89.700 '18400 107,500 GR 15.700 114,300 10.700 114.800 10.500 124,300 10.500 134.300 10.500 144,300 GR 10.600 154.300 10.700 164.300 10.800 174,300 10,800 184,300 10,800 194.300 GR 10,800 204.300 10.600 214,300 10,300 224.300 10,400 234,300. 11.000 244.300 GR 12.200 254,300 14.300 255.300 17.400 260.800 19,500 274.900 22,200 288,500 GR 22.500 297,000 26.800 323.100 28.300 345.100 28.000 357,400 18,500 407.500 GR 18.800 426,100 17,600 431,400 18.700 437.500 .000 400 , .000 .000 NC .045 .045 .000 ,104 .300 .000 .000 400 400 .000 X1 1612.000 29.000 261,400 420,600 720.000 740,000 720,000 .000 .400 .000 GR 20.000 .000 19.600 200,000 19.600 228.800 18,900 250,300 18,400 261.400 GR 16.100 265.400 14,300 266,500 11,500 273,500 11.200 285.500 11,000 295.500 GR 11.000 305,500 11,000 315.500 11,300 330.500 11.700 345.500 11,800 365.500 GR 11,700 385.500 11.700 395,500 11.900 405,500 12400 411.500 13,700 419.100 GR 16,400 420.600 18,000 453,700 18,800 478.800 18,900 495,900 21400 516.500 GR 20.500 535,000 19.000 583.400 17,900 589,600 19,100 596,600 .000 400 X1 2532.000 21,000 1260.500 1401.900 920,000 950,000 920.000 .000 .000 .000 X3 10,000 .400 .000 4000 400 .000 400 50.000 50.000 .400 GR 25.000 40.000 21,000 310,000 20.200 570.000 21.400 730,000 20400 890.000 GR 20.000 1200,000 19.700 1234.000 19,300 1258,000 19.100 1260.500 14,500 1267,000 GR 12.800 1274.000 12.800 1298,900 13,400 1327,000 12.400 1366,000 12,800 1391,000 GR 14.400 1393,900 19,300 1401,900 19,800 1412.900 24,700 1439,900 28.100 1469,900 GR 22.600 1514,900 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 400 X1 3382,000 21,000 1232,000 1362,900 850,000 840.000 850.000 400 .000 .000 X3 10,000 .000 .000 .000 . .000 400 .000 50.000 50.000 .000 GR 25.000 20,000 21,700 230,000 20.600 380.000 21.700 570,000 20,000 1110.000 GR 20.100 1200,000 20,600 1211,000 20,100 1222,000 18.800 1230.000 18.400 1232.000 GR 14.600 1239.000 13,100 1246.000 12.200 1266.000 14.200 1290,000 15,600 1332.000 GR 13,900 1354,000 15.100 1358.000 18.500 1362.900 23.000 1410,900 23.400 1420./00 GR 24,900 1434,900 400 .400 .400 .400 .000 .000 .000 .000 NC .000 .000 .000 .300 .500 .000 . .000 .000 .000 .000 SOUTH BOEING BRIDGE Xl 3902.000 19,000 1318.000 1487.000 520,000 520.000 520,000 .000 .000 .000 X3 10,000 .000 ,400 .000 400 ,000 400 25,500 25.500 400 GR 21.300 1100.000 24,700 1300.000 24,900 1313,000 25.000 1318.000 20,700 1320.000 GR 17.300 1338.000 15.200 1342,900 14.600 1350.000 15.900 1360.000 15,000 1403.000 GR 14,400 1427,000 14,400 1449,000 14,000 1459.400 15,800 1464,000 16,900 1466.000 GR 18.900 1473,000 21,200 1485,000 25.000 1487.000 24,200 1521,000 .000 .000 SB 1,250 1,800 3.000 400 118,000 4.000 902.000 3,852 15.310 1.5,310 X1 3964,000 .000 .000 .000 62,000 62.000 62.000 .000 .000 .000 X2 400 400 1,000 21.800 25,500 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 X3 10.000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 25,000 25,000 .000 BT 7.000 1100.000 21,300 .000 1300,000 24.700 .000 1313,000 24,900 400 BT 1318.000 25,000 .000 1402,500 25,500 .400 1487.000 25.000 .000 1521,000 BT 24,200 .000 .000 400 .000 .400 400 .000 .000 .000 1 NC .000 .000 .000 .000 .800 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 X1 4114.000 30,000 1432,100 1567,300 150.000 150,000 150.000 .000 .000 ,000 X3 10,000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 50.000 50.000 .000 GR 30,000 63,000 25,000 70,000 22,300 270.000 23.300 405,000 23,000 680,000 GR 20,400 1400,000 19,800 1425,900 18,200 1432.100 16.000 1434,000 14.500 1437,400 GR 15,800 1447,800 15,700 1475,100 15,600 1495,800 15,000 1530,400 14.900 1555,800 GR 16,100 1559,100 22.300 1567,300 23.300 1585,600 24,800 1618,700 25.500 1623.200 GR 25.800 1626,200 25,600 1662,000 26,200 1773,000 26,500 1905,700 27,000 2029.900 GR 27,300 2127.200 26.600 2158,500 26.600 2270.000 26.700 2390,000 26,900 2520,900 NC .000 .000 .025 .100 .300 0000 ,000 .000 .000 .000 X1 4654,000 33,000 1492.300 1624.600 540,000 540,000 540.000 .000 .000 .000 X3' 10.000 .000 ,000 .000 .000 .000 .000 50.000 50.000 .000 GR 30,000 20.000 25.000 30,000 23,600 210,000 25.000 530,000 25,700 630.000 GR 25.000 710.000 24.100 840,000 24.600 1090.000 24,400 1300,000 23,900 1356,300 GR 23,300 1433,100 22.600 1445.500 22,000 1447,900 22,600 1451.000 22.600 1471,500 GR 22.100 1487,300 21,700 1492,300 17,000 1496,300 15.600 1500,500 16.100 1517.300 GR 16.300 1549,100 16.500 1579.000 17.000 1602,800 17.300 1611,600 19,200 1621,700 GR 21.800 1624.600 26.400 1659,800 26.900 1673,700 27.500 1681,000 26.000 1693,300 GR 26.700 1701,000 27.000 1752,400 27.500 1803,800 .000 .000 .000 .000 Xl 5244,000 23,000 248,300 380.900 620.000 550,000 590.000 .000 .000 .000 X3 _ 10.000 .000 .000 .000 ,000 .000 .000 50.000 50,000 .000 GR 28,100 ,000 28,200 50,200 27,400 114,100 26.000 162.200 24.900 206,400 GR 24.700 226.200 23.500 243,800 23.600 248.300 17,900 254.400 16,500 258,000 GR 16.400 272.200 17.000 290,500 17.400 306,500 17,900 320,200 18.300 366,900 GR 22,400 380,900 23.400 396,100 27,900 424,300 28,600 448,200 29.100 454.400 GR 27.400 467,700 27,200 528,200 28.000 840,000 .000 .000 .000 .000 NC .000 .000 .000 .300 600 .000 ,000 .000 .000 .000 LOGAN AVENUE BRIDGE Xi 5644,000 12,000 34.000 186,000 410,000 400,000 400.000 .000 .000 .000 X3 10.000 .000 ,000 .000 .000 .000 .000 32.400 32.400 .000 GR 27.300 .000 26,100 34.000 18,700 48.000 17,500 53,000 17.600 68,000 GR 17.800 98,000 18.400 130.000 18,600 157,000 22.300 171,000 24,900 186.000 GR 27.200 192.400 32o200 192.500 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 ,000 SB 1,250 2,000 3,000 .000 170.000 3.500 1243,000 .000 19.400 19.400 X1 5762,000 .000 ,000 ,000 118,000 118,000 118,000 .000 .000 .000 X2 ' .000 .000 1.000 26.900 32.400 ,000 .000 .000 .000 .000 X3 10.000 ,000 ,000 .000 .000 .000 .000 32.400 32.400 ,000 BT 2,000 .000 32.400 .000 192.500 32.400 .000 .000 ,000 .000 X1 6012.000 17,000 26,000 167,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 .000 .000 .000 GR 29,100 .000 28,800 26,000 20,400 36.000 19,500 46,000 19.100 66.000 GR 18,900 90,000 18,100 121,000 18,600 138.000 19.500 140,000 22,500 146.000 GR 22,800 156,000 25,200 156,010 25.300 159.000 29,800 167,000 30,600 181,000 GR 31,500 191,000 32.500 226.000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 1 04/20/87 13:53:44 PAGE 4 • WILLIAMS AVENUE BRIDGE X1 6502,000 17,000 34,800 177,900 500,000 480,000 490,000 .000 ,000 .000 X3 10.000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 34.800 34,800 .000 GR 34.300 .000 34.300 29,700 34,800 34.800 29.700 35.200 22,700 52.800 GR 20,200 57,500 19.100 74.100 19,200 101,900 19.700 127.900 20.000 149,200 GR 24.000 157.600 24.400 169,700 26,200 172,500 28.600 172.510 31,400 177,100 GR 34.000 177,900 33.300 202.100 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 SB .900 1.300 3,000 .000 114,000 11.100 1296.000 1,261 20.000 20.000 8436.U00 34.00 114.6.) 31.1U Z1.60 ,UU 3U,i4 Mt/7G/,!U 176,YU 14D.hU 1i./1 8436.000 34,00 119,68 32,90 21,60 .00 31.85 28.11 27,70 156,90 147.79 13.09 8436,000 34.00 120.99 33.64 21.60 .00 32,52 27,70 27.70 156,90 148,69 12,76 8436,000 34.00 122,99 35.32 21,60 .00 34,00 27.70 27,70 156.90 150.69 12.33 8476,000 40,00 94.43 31.34 19,50 .00 30.27 30.58 6.10 149,10 125,01 15.87 8476,000 40,00 99.80 33,22 19,50 ,00 31,87 28.09 6.10 149.10 127.89 16.32 3476.000 40.00 102.03 34,00 19.50 .00 32.53 27.06 6.10 149.10 129,09 16,39 8476.000 40.00 107,61 35.73 19,50 .00 34.00 24.66 6.10 149.10 132,27 16.89 8596,000 120,00 141,86 31.62 21,80 .00 31,05 73.49 69.10 230.30 227,37 22,13 8596,000 120.00 148,47 33.51 21,80 .00 32,86 71.26 69,10 230.30 231.74 20,27 8596,000 120,00 152,37 34,29 21.80 .00 33.59 70.35 69.10 230,30 234,73 19.62 8596.000 120,00 182,15 36.04 21.80 .00 35.25 50.94 69.10 230,30 245.09 18.65 8836,000 240.00 154.44 32,20 22,80 .00 31,56 33.81 9,50 189,40 188,25 24.92 8836,000 240.00 157,49 34.01 22.80 .00 33,30 31.37 9.50 189.40 188.86 19.94 8836.000 240.00 158.77 34,76 22,80 .00 34.02 30,35 9.50 189,40 189.12 18,55 8836,000 240,00 226.54 36.44 22,80 ,00 35.65 28,03 9.50 189.40 254,57 16.26 9446.000 610.00 109,34 33.96 24.60 ,00 33.21 25.75 8.40 136,80 135.09 32.51 9446.000 610.00 118.04 35.67 24.60 .00 34,68 24.21 8.40 136.80 157.93 34.97 W 9446.000 610.00 135.32 36.38 24.60 .00 35,30 23.57 8.40 136.80 158,89 35.25 h 9446,000 610,00 143.33 38.01 24.60 .00 7777 22.08 8.40 136.80 165,41 35.27 10236.000 790.00 130.29 36.27 27.40 ,00 35.69 40.83 20,00 178.20 171,12 25,89 )` 10236,000 790.00 134.61 38,05 27,40 ,00 37,33 39.08 20,00 178,20 173.69 25.57 10236.000 790.00 136,36 38,77 27.40 .00 _Lilt38,37 20.00 178,20 174.73 2506 y 10236.000 790,00 140,31 40,42 27,40 .00 , 9 36,77 20,00 178.20 177,08 25.74 1 04/20/87 13:53:44 PAGE 59 SECNO XLCH TOPWI➢ EG ELMIN CRIWS CWSEL SSTA STCHL STCHR ENDST 1OK*S 11156.000 920.00 94.61 38.69 27.70 .00 37.96 12,79 10.00 108.70 107,40 25.74 11156.000 920,00 136,96 40,59 27,70 .00 39,63 11.40 10.00 108.70 148,36 28,20 11156.000 920,00 143.48 41.34 27.70 .00 40,29 10,84 10.00 108.70 154.32 28,67 11156.000 920.00 201.23 43.01 27,.70 .00 41,79 9.59 10.00 108,70 210,82 28.78 1 04/20/87 13:53:44 PAGE 60 CEDAR RIVER-10 YR FLOW SUMMARY PRINTOUT SECNO K*XNL K*XNCH K*XNR Ct QLOB (NCH GROB AREA UCH STENCL STENCR .100 35.00 25.00 35.00 5460.00 .00 5460.00 .00 653.23 8.36 ,00 ,00 .100 35.00 25.00 35.00 7580.00 .00 7580.00 .00 798.67 9.49 .00 .00 .100 35,00 25,00 35.00 8530.00 .00 8530,00 ,00 858.41 9,94 .00 .00 .100 35.00 25.00 35,00 10900.00 .00 10900,00 .00 1005.91 10,84 .00 .00 * 62,000 .00 25.00 .00 5460,00 .00 5460.00 .00 688.75 7,93 ,00 .00 * 62.000 .00 25.00 .00 7580.00 .00 7580.00 .00 848.90 8.93 .00 ,00 * 62.000 .00 25.00 .00 8530.00 .00 8530,00 .00 916.41 9.31 .00 .00 * 62.000 .00 25.00 .00 10900.00 .00 10900.00 ,00 1076,18 10,13 ,00 .00 892.000 35,00 25.00 35.00 5460.00 +00 5460,00 .00 647.57 8,43 .00 .00 892.000 35,00 25,00 35.00 7580,00 .00 7580.00 .00 794,20 9,54 .00 .00 892,000 35.00 25.00 35.00 8530,00 .00 8530,00 .00 855,82 9.97 ,00 .00 1612,000 45,00 25,00 45.00 5460,00 .00 5456,68 3,32 854.20 6.43 .00 .00 1612.000 45,00 25.00 45,00 7580,00 .00 7533.03 46.97 1073.21 • 7.28 .00 .00 1612.000 45.00 25.00 45,00 8530,00 .64 8436,49 92,86 1178,99 7.60 .00 .00 1612.000 45.00 25.00 45.00 10900.00 43,88 10539.79 316,33 1533.67 8,17 .00 .00 2532,000 45.00 25.00 45.00 5460.00 .00 5460,00 .00 714.14 7,65 .00 .00 2532.000 45.00 25,00 45.00 7580.00 00 7580.00 .00 872.85 8►68 .00• .00 2532,000 45.00 25,00 45,00 8530,00 00 8530,00 40 935,19 9,12 .00 .00 2532,000 45,00 25,00 45.00 10900.00 .80 10900,00 .00 1072.93 10,16 .00 00 3382,000 45,00 25.00 45,00 5460,00 .00 5460.00 .00 732,99 7.45 .00 .00 3382.000 45.00 25,00 45.00 7580.00 .40 7580.00 .00 883.56 8,58 .00 .00 3382,000 45.00 25.00 45,00 8530,00 .00 8530,00 .00 941,76 9.06 .00 .00 3382.000 45,00 25,00 45,00 10900,00 00 10900,00 .00 1076,09 10,13 .00 .00 3902.000 45,00 25.00 45,00 5460,00 .00 5460.00 .00 827.75 6.60 .00 .00 3902.000 45,00 25.00 45,00 ' 7580,00 .00 7580,00 .00 1043,65 7.26 ,00 .00 3902,000 45.00 25,00 45,00 8530,00 .00 8530,00 .00 1133,84 7,52 .40 .00 3902,000 45,00 25.00 45.00 10900.00 .00 10900,00 .00 1343.00 8.12 40 00 3964,000 .00 25.00 .40 5460.00 00 5460,00 .00 842.34 6.48 .40 .00 3964,000 .00 25,00 .00 7580.00 .00 7580+00 00 1283.08 5.91 .00 .00 3964.000 .00 25,00 .00 8530.00 00 8530,00 .00 1464,27 5,83 .00 .00 3964,000 45,00 25.00 45,00 10900.00 685,96 10197,71 16.33 2055,05 6.54 .00 .00 4114,000 45.40 ' 25,00 45,00 . 5460,00 .00 5460.00 .40 756,46 7,22 .00 .00 4114,000 45,00 25,00 45.00 7580+00 .00 7580,00 .00 1098,53 6,90 .00 .00 4114,000 45,00 25.00 45,00 8530,00 .00 8530,00 .00 1241,92 6,87 .40 .00 4114.000 45,00 25.00 45,00 10900,00 40 10900,00 .00 1312,67 8,30 .00 .00 1 04/20/87 13:53:44 PAGE .61 SECNO K*XNL K*XNCH K*XNR Q QLOB QCH QROB AREA UCH STENCL STENCR 4654,000 45,00 25.00 45.00 5460.00 .00 5460,00 .00 705.73 7,74 40 .00 4654.000 45,00 25,00 45,00 7580,00 .00 7580.00 .00 987,11 7.68 .00 .00 4654.000 45,00 25.00 45,00 8530,00 .00 8530.00 .00 1117.51 7,63 .00 40 4654.000 45.00 25,00 45.00 10900.00 .00 10900.00 .00 1200.97 9,08 .00 .00 5244,000 4540 25,00 45,00 5460,00 ,00 5460,00 .00 696.32 7,84 .00 .00 5244,000 45.00 25.00 45.00 7580,00 .00 7580,00 .00 921,83 8,22 .00 .40 5244,000 45,00 25.00 45.00 8530.00 .40 8530.00 .00 1034.12 8.25 .00 .00 5244,000 45,00 25.00 45.00 10900,00 40 10900.00 .00 1141,31 9.55 .40 .00 5644,000 45.00 25.00 45,00 5460.00 .00 5460,00 .00 744,25 7,34 .00 .00 5644,000 45,00 25.00 45.00 7580,00 .00 7580.00 .00 973.22 7,79 .00 .00 5644,000 45,00 25.00 45,00 8530.00 .00 8530,00 .00 . 1089,35 7,83 .00 .00 5644,000 45,00 25,00 45,00 10900,00 .00 10900.00 40 1245.06 8,75 .00 .00 5762.000 .,40 25.00 40 5460.00 00 5460,00 .00 759.28 7.19 .00 .00 5762.000 .40 25,00 .00 7580,00 .00 7580,00 .00 988,88 7,67 .00 .00 5762,000 .40 25.00 .00 8530.00 40 8530,00 .00 1190.26 7.17 .00 .40 5762,000 00 25,00 .00 10900.00 .40 10900,00 .00 1480,99 7.36 .40 40 6012,000 45.00 25.00. 45,00 5460,00 ,00 5460,00 .40 629.53 8,67 .00 .40 6012,000 45.00 25.40 45.00 7580,00 .00 7580,00 .00 813.01 9.32 .00 .00 6012,000 45.00 25.00 45.00 8530,00 .40 8530,00 40 974.34 8.75 .00 40 6012,000 45►00 25,00 45.00 10900,00 .34 10899.66 .00 1228,55 8.88 .00 .00 6502.000 45,00 25.00 45,00 5460.00 .00 5460,00 40 660.58 8.27 .00 .00 6502.000 45.00 25,00 4540 7580.00 .00 7580,00 .00 823,91 9,20 00 .00 6502.000 45.00 25.00 45.00 8530.00 .00 8530.00 40 941.58 9.06 .00 .00 X2 ,000 .000 1,000 31,100 34,800 .000 . .000 .000 ,000 ,000 X3 10.000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 34,800 34,800 .000 BT 2,000 .000 34,800 .000 177,900 34,800 ,000 .000 '.000 .000 Xi 6681,000 13,000 9,500 148,300 140,000 150,000 140,000 400 .000 .000 GR 31,800 .000 31.600 6,300 31,300 9,500 20,600 18.300 19,700 34,300 GR 19,400 55,300 20.100 78,300 20,600 91,300 20.600 113,300 24,300 121.300 GR 24,800 138,300 32.800 138,310 33,900 148,300 .000 .000 .000 .000 X1 6921,000 11.000 10,000 134.010 240,000 240.000 240,000 .000 .000 .000 GR 35.900 .000 35,900 10,000 25,500 10.010 19.500 19.000 19,500 112,000 GR 24,900 120.000 24.900 130,000 27,400 130,010 27.400 134,000 36.200 134.010 GR 36,200 144.000 .000 .000 .000 .000 ,000 .000 .000 .000 NC .000 .000 .030 .000 .800 .000 ' .000 .000 .000 .000 WELLS AVENUE BRIDGE X1 6931.000 14,000 10.000 134,010 10,000 10,000 10,000 ,000 .000 .000 BT 14.000 .000 35,900 35,900 10,000 35.900 35.900 10.010 35.900 30.600 BT 19,000 35.900 30,600 112,000 36,100 30,600 117,000 36.200 30.600 117,010 BT 36,200 30,600 120,000' 36,200 30.600 120.010 36,200 32.900 130,000 36,200 ST 32►900 130.010 36,200 32►900 134,000 36,200 32,900 134,010 36,200 36,200 ST 144,000 36,200 36.200 .000 .000 .000 4000 .000 .000 .000 GR 35,900 .000 35,900 10.000 25,500 10,010 19,500 19.000 19,500 112,000 GR 22.800 117.000 30.600 . 117.010 30,600 120.000 24.900 120,010 24,900 130.000 GR 27,400 130.010 27►400 134,000 36.200 134,010 36,200 144,000 .000 ,000 X1 6973,000 .000 .000 .000 42,000 42.000 42.000 .000 .000 .000 X2 , ,000 .000 .000 .000 ,000 ,000 1,000 .000 ,000 .000 NC .000 .000 .025 .000 .000 ,000 .000 ,000 .000 .000 X1 6983,000 11,000 10,000 134,010 10,000 10A00 10.000 ,000 .000 .000 GR 35.900 .000 35,900 10,000 25,500 10,010 19.500 19.000 19,500 112.000 • GR 24.900 120.000 24,900 130,000 27.400 130,010 27.400 134,000 36,200 134,010 GR 36.200 144,000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 NC .000 .000 .000 .100 .400 .000 ,000 .000 .000 .000 X1 7103,000 17,000 16,300 160,910 120►000 130.000 120,000 .000 .000 .000 GR 34,000 .000 33.600 16,300 27,300 29,900 26,800 39.900 26,700 41,400 GR 21.700 45,700 20,800 59.900 20►900 98.900 20.600 125,900 20.800 142.900 GR 21.600 145.900 25.000 150.900 25.400 160.900 27,900 160.910 27.600 164,900 GR 33,500 164.910 - 34.100 180,800 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 1 04/20/87 13:53:44 PAGE 5 NC .000 .000 ,020 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 X1 7483,000 17,000 22.500 165,000 370,000 380,000 380.000 .000 .000 .000 GR 37.600 .000 36.400 17.000 35.000 22,500 29.300 27.900 22.400 37,000 GR 21.600 38.000 21.800 52,800 21,700 85.700 21,300 113.600 21,400 133,600 GR 22,100 136,600 25,900 141,700 26.200 151.700 28.600 151,710 28,500 155.000 GR 34,300 155.010 37.200 165,000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 ,000 NC .000 .000 .028 .000 .500 .000 .100 .000 .000 .000 X1 7643,000 13,000 50,000 179,000 160.000 170,000 160.000 .000 .000 .000 X3 10.000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 40.000 40,000 .000 GR 40,100 .000 40,100 20.000 40,000 21.500 22.700 48,000 22,200 50,000 GR 22.000 67,800 21,700 98.900 21.700 123.800 22.600 148,900 23.100 149.500 CP a0.unn 1c7.nnn 90.0nn 1A1_AAA dn_1(A 170_AM AAA AAA AAA AAA BT 33.800 149,500 40,000 33.800 149,510 40,000 33,800 157,000 40,000 33,800 BT 157.010 40,000 37,400 163.000 40,000 37.400 174.800 40.000 37.400 - 179.000 BT 40,100 40.100 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 ,000 400 CR 40,100 .000 40,100 20.000 40.000 21,500 40.000 48,000 40.000 50,000 GR 22.200 50,010 22.000 67.800 21.700 98,900 21,700 123.800 22,600 148.900 CR 23.100 149,500 ' 33.800 149,510 33,800 157.000 29.900 157,010 29,900 163.000 GR 37.400 174.800 40,100 179,000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 NC .000 .000 6025 400 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 X1 7725.000 .000 .000 - .000 72.000 72.000 72.000 .000 .000 .000 X2 .000 .000 . .000 .000 ,000 .000 1.000 .000 .000 400 X1 7735,000 15.000 50.000 179,000 10,000 10,000 10.000 .000 .000 .000 X3 10.000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 40.000 40.000 .000 GR 40.100 .000 40.100 20,000 40,000 21,500 40,000 48,000 40.000 50,000 GR 22,200 50,010 22.000 67.800 21.700 98.900 21.700 123.800 22.600 148.900 GR 23.100 149.500 29,900 157.010 29,900 163,000 37.400 174.800 40,100 179,000 NC .000 .000 .025 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 LIBRARY X1 7845,000 21,000 3.600 167,900 110,000 100.000 110.000 .000 .000 .000 X3 10,000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 50,000 50,000 ,000 GR 41,300 .400 40,000 3.600 36.000 9.600 35.500 12.500 30.400 14.500 CR 29.500 23,400 27.600 26,400 . 26.300 31.400 23,900 32.800 22.900 41,400 GR 22.800 43.400 22,500 62,400 22,100 88,400 . 21.400 108,400 21.700 124.400 GR 21.800 128,400 23.000 133,400 25.600 135,400 27.200 140.400 39,000 167.900 GR 40,300 185,300 .000 .000 .000 ,000 ,000 .000 ,0,00 400 1 04/20/87 13:53:44 PAGE 6 • SB 1,050 1,700 3.000 .000 101.000 6,000 1999,000 1.875 22,600 22,600 X1 8002,000 .000 .000 .000 157,000 157,000 157,000 .000 000 .000 X2 .000 .000 1.000 38,600 50,000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 X3 ' 10,000 400 .000 .000 .000 .000 , .000 50.000 50,000 400 BT 2.000 ,000 50.000 .000 185.300 ' 50.000 .000 400 .000 .000 NC .000 ' .000 .030 ,000 ,000 .000 .000 .000 ,000 .000 X1 8092,000 15.000 125.200 274,000 90.000 80.000 90.000 .000 .000 .000 GR 36.000 000 32,000 20.000 32.400 100,000 31,900 122,200 31,900 125.200 GR 26,500 128.900 25.700 139,700 22,200 141,900 22.400 161,000 22,600 184,500 GR 22.400 209,300 23,400 229,600 30,200 238'200 30,800 246,600 42.000 274.000 NC .000 .000 .025 400 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 HOUSER WAY BRIDGE X1 8402.000 15,000 27,700 156,900 290,000 310,000 310.000 .000 ,000 .000 X3 10,000 .000 .000 .000 .000 ,000 .000 41,000 41.000 .000 GR 39,600 ,000 36,300 • 15,400 32,100 27,700 29.900 31,300 23,700 48,500 CR 21.800 57.900 21.600 82,800 22,700 102,000 23,700 114,400 224,500 120.600 GR 24,800 132,900 26.300 137,600 27,500 141,900 36.000 153,400 39,100 156.900 SB 1,250 1.300 3.000 .000 83.000 4,000 1270,000 2,049 22.800 22,800 X1 8436.000 .000 .000 ,000 34,000 34,000 34,000 .000 .000 .000 X2 .000 .000 1.000 35.000 41.000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 X3 10.000 .000 ,000 .000 .000 .000 400 41,000 41.000 400 BT 2.000 ,000 41.000 .000 156,900 41,000 .000 ,000 .000 .000 NC .000 .000 .000 .300 .870 ,000 .000 .000 .000 ,000 RAILROAD BRIDGE Xl 8476,000 15.000 6.100 149,100 40.000 40,000 40.000 .000 .000 .000 GR 47,200 .000 45.500 6,100 37.500 18,200 33.600 25.400 23,700 40.800 GR 19.500 43,900' 21.700 70;600 22.700 92.300 23.700 100.500 25.000 111,100 nr. n••i •inn .nn ,tnn nn inn ,n. nnrt 97 ,nn ,A! 1AA A9 7hA 1A6 IAA AO LAA 17']_AAA n1 d3.nUU 10.7U0 40.000 33,800 10.510 40.000 33,800 157.000 40,000 33.800 BT 157,010 40.000 37,400 163,000 40,000 37.400 174.800 40.000 37,400 179.000 BT 40.100 40.100 .000 .000 400 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 CR 40,100 • .000 40,100 20,000 40,000 21,500 40.000 48.000 40.000 50,000 GR 22,200 50,010 22,000 67,800 21.700 98,900 21,700 123.800 22.600 148.900 GR 23,100 149,500 • 33.800 149.510 33.800 157,000 29,900 157.010 29.900 163,000 GR 37.400 174,800 40.100 179,000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 NC .000 .000 .025 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 X1 7725,000 .000 .000 - .000 72.000 72,000 72,000 000 .000 .000 X2 .000 .000 . .000 ,000 .000 .000 1.000 .000 .000 .000 X1 7735,000 15.000 50,000 179.000 10,000 10.000 10.000 .000 .000 .000 X3 10,000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 40.000 40.000 .000 GR 40.100 .000 40.100 20,000 40.000 21,500 40,000 48.000 40,000 50,000 GR 22.200 50.010 22.000 67.800 21,700 98.900 21.700 123.800 .22,600 148.900 GR 23,100 149,500 29,900 157.010 29,900 163,000 37.400 174.800 40.100 179.000 NC .000 .000 .025 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 LIBRARY X1 7845.000 21,000 3,600 167,900 110.000 100.000 110,000 .000 .000 ,000 X3 10,000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 50.000 50.000 .000 GR 41.300 ,000 40.000 3.600 36,000 9.600 35,500 12,500 30,400 14.500 CR 29,500 23,400 27,600 26,400 . 26.300 31,400 23,900 32.800 22,900 41.400 CR 22.800 43.400 22.500 62,400 22,100 88.400 . 21,400 108,400 21,700 124.400 GR 21.800 128.400 236000 133,400 25,600 135,400 27,200 140,400 39.000 167.900 GR 40.300 185,300 ,000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 1 04/20/87 13:53044 PAGE 6 SB 1.050 1,700 3,000 .000 101.000 6.000 1999.000 1.875 22,600 22.600 X1 8002,000 .000 .000 ,000 157,000 157,000 157.000 .000 .000 .000 X2 .000 ' .000 1.0.00 38.600 50.000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 X3 ' 10,000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 , .000 50,000 50,000 .000 BT 2,000 .000 50.000 .000 185,300 ' 50,000 .000 ,000 ' .000 .000 NC .000 ' .000 .030 .000 .000 • .000 .000 ,000 400 .000 X1 8092.000 15.000 125.200 274.000 90,000 80.000 90,000 .000 .000 .000 GR 36.000 .000 32,000 20,000 32.400 100,000 31,900 122.200 31,900 125,200 GR 26.500 128,900 25.700 139,700 22,200 141.900 22,400 161,000 22,600 184.500 GR 22,400 209,300 23,400 229,600 30,200 238,200 30.800 246,600 42.000 274,000 NC .000 .000 .025 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 ROUSER WAY BRIDGE X1 8402,000 15.000 27,700 156,900 290,000 310,000 310.000 .000 .000 .000 X3 10.000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 41.000 41.000 .000 GR 39.600 .000 36,300 . 15.400 32,100 27,700 29.900 31,300 23,700 48.500 CR 21.800 57,900 21,600 82.800 22,700 102.000 23,700 114,400 24,500 120.600 GR 24.800 132,900 26.300 137,600 27,500 141,900 36,000 153,400 39.100 156,900 SB 1,250 1,300 3,000 .000 83,000 4.000 1270.000 2,049 22.800 22,800 X1 8436.000 .000 400 400 34,000 34,000 34,000 ,000 .000 .000 X2 .000 .000 1,000 35,000 41,000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .400 X3 10,000 400 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 41.000 41,000 .000 DT 2.000 ,000 41.000 .000 156,900 41.000 .000 .000 .000 .000 NC .000 .000 ,000 .300 .870 ,000 ,000 ,000 .000 .000 RAILROAD BRIDGE X1 8476.000 15.000 6.100 149,100 40,000 40,000 40,000 .000 .000 .000 GR 47,200 ,000 45.500 6.100 37.500 18.200 33.600 25,400 23.700 40.800 GR 19,500 43,900 21,700 70.600 22,700 92.300 23,700 100.500 25,000 111.100 rP 77.7AA 17A.4AA 'MAN 1']1.nnA 17.tnn 11 .1AA A .']hA 1e0.1AA AA..GAA 177.11 A • • NC -,080 i000 ,035 ,300 .800 ,000 .000 ,000 • ,000 ,000 BRONSON WAY BRIDGE X1 7653,000 17,000 50,000 1799,000 10,000 10.000 10.000 ,000 ,000 ,000 BT 17,000 ,000 40,100 40,100 20,000 40,100 40,100 21,500 40,000 40,000 BT 48,000 40,000 40,000 50,000 40,000 40,000 50,010 40,000. 33,800 67,800 - - .Ter__. _An..lInn-----:7.9nn-----QA AAA 't ..Ann 17;.Ann An_..nnn- &) 40.04(1- - -- NC _--_4050.. - - 440_._.. .035. •100 .300. ..000 ,000 .400 - .000. -- ,000..__ - I-405 • X1 8596,000 23,000 69,100 230,300 160,000 100,000 120,000 .000 .000 400 GR 49,700 .000 46,200 28,400 34,300 52,900 34,600 69,100 27,900 77,400 GR 26.400 103,700 60.000 103.710 60.000 109,700 25,900 109,710 23,800 133,700 GR 23.400 147,900 23.200 169,300 21,800 189,000 21,800 196.000 60.000 196.010 GR 60,000 202.000 21.900 202,010 21,900 205,900 24,000 213,100 32,500 230,300 GR 34,800 239,600 36.500 260.200 36,600 288,800 ,000 .000 .000 .000 X1 8836,000 16.000 9.500 189.400 230.000 230,000 240,000 400 .000 .000 GR 49.100 .000 48.800 9.500 31,000 34.600 30.400 60.600 28.900 73,500 GR 28,300 85.100 26,500 91,500 24.700 109,200 23,600 122,200 22,800 . 143,400 GR 23.500 166,600 23,000 185,200 34.800 189.400 34.700 195,600 35.200 220.300 GR 36,000 280.000 ,000 .000 .000 ,000 .000 ,000 .000 400 1 04/20/87 13:53:44 PACE 7 NC .050 ,050 .044 .000 .000 400 .000 ,000 .000 .000 Xl 9446,000 16.000 8,400 136,800 570,000 650,000 610,000 .000 ,000 .000 )( GR 51.000 .000 49.800 8,400 25,800 33,500 24.600 38,000 25.000 51.500 V GR 24.800 72.300 24,900 90,200 25,800 110,400 26,200 113,800 26,500 117.800 4.1 GR 28.900 128,300 34,300 136.800 35.200 145.500 34.600 157,800 36,000 160.000 GR 40.000 190,000 ,000 .000 .000 ' ,000 .000 ,000 ,000 .000 Xl 10236,000 15,000 20.000 178.200 800,000 740.000 790,000 .000 .000 .000 1/4 GR 55,300 .000 ' 55,000 20,000 41,800 34,300 28.700 48,300 27,900 52.500 GR 27.500 71,900 27.600 101.000 28,700 129.300 27.400 146.600 28,500 151,000 R 30.500 153,500 32,100 159,000 33,200 167,200 40,200 178,200 40,100 193.500 X1 11156,000 15,000 10,000 108,700 820,000 970.000 920,000 .000 .000 .000 GR 48,600 3,900 41,300 10,000 34.000 16.100 29.600 27,900 28.400 35,200 GR 27,800 46,900 27.700 59,600 28,000 78,200 27,800 90.600 29,600 95.800 GR 38.900 108,700 39.300 115,500 39,100 143.600 40,600 157.100 44,000 310,000 EJ .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 ,000 .000 .000 .000 .000 1 04/20/87 13:53:44 PAGE 8 SECNO DEPTH CWSEL CRIWS WSELE EG HV HL OLOSS BANE ELEV L{ GLOB (ICH ROB ALOB ACH AROB VOL TWA LEFT/RIGHT TIME VLOB UCH UROB XNL XNCH XHR WTN ELMIN SSTA SLOPE XLOBL XLCH XLOBR ITRIAL IDC ICONT CORAR TOPWID ENDST *PROF 1 CCHV= .300 CEHU= 1.000 *SECNO .100 3495 OVERBANK AREA ASSUMED NON-EFFECTIVE,ELLEA= 22.70 ELREA= 22,70 LAKE WASHINGTON .10 10,13 12,93 .00 14,00 14,01 1.08 .00 ,00 17,40 5460, 0, 5460. 0, 0. 653, 0, 0. 0. 18,20 ,00 .00 8,36 .00 .035 .025 .035 .400 2,80 38,08 '002988 0, 0. 0, 0 0 4 .00 151.95 190.03 0 • CCHV= .300 CEHU= .500 RUFF TAT RNACP *SECNO 62.000 CLASS B LOW FLOW 3420 BRIDGE W.S,= 12.32 BRIDGE VELOCITY=, 10,49 CALCULATED CHANNEL AREA:, 520. EGPRS EGLWC H3 QWEIR QLOW BAREA TRAPEZOID ELLC ELTRD AREA .00 14.14 00 0, 5460. 1495. 1490. 18.70 22,70 3495 OVERBANK AREA ASSUMED NON-EFFECTIVE,ELLEA= 22,70 ELREA= 22.70 U/S END OF NORTH BOEING BRIDGE 62.00 10,36 13.16 .00 .00 14,14 .98 .12 .00 17,40 5460. 0, 5460. • 0, 0. 689. 0. 1. 0, 18.20 .00 .00 7,93 .00 .000 ,025 .000 .000 2,80 37.57 #002521 62. 62. 62. 0 0 0 +00 152.51 190.08 0 *SECNO 892,000 892,00 5.01 15.31 00 .00 16,41 1,10 2,21 .06 18,60- 5460. 0, 5460. 0, O. 648, 0. 14. 3, 17.40 .03 .00 8.43 ,00 .035 .025 .035 . .000 10.30 114,34 .002827 840, 830. 830. 2 0 0 100 142,75 257,09 • 0 1 04/20/87 13:53:44 PAGE 9 SECNO DEPTH CWSEL CRIWS WSELK Er, HV HL OLOSS BANK ELEV QLOB QCH QROB ALOB ACH AROB VOL TWA LEFT/RIGHT TIME VLOB VCH .VROB XNL XNCH XNR WIN ELMIN SSTA SLOPE XLOBL XLCH XLOBR ITRIAL IDC ICONT CORAR TOPWID ENDS? CCHV: .100 CEHV= .300 *SECNO 1612,000 1612.00 6.13 17,13 .00 .00 17,77 +64 1.31 .05 18,40 5460, 0. 5457, 3, 0. 849. 6+ 26. 6. 16;40 .06 .00 6143 .60 • .045 .025 +045 .000 11.00 263.61 .001271 720. 720. 740. • 2 0 0 .00 172.11 435.71 • 0 *SECNO 2532+000 3495 OVERBANK AREA ASSUMED NOH-EFFECTIVE,ELLEA: 50.00 ELREA= 50.00 2532.00 5.97 18.37 .00 .00 19.27 .91 1.42 • .08 19.10 5460. 0, 5460. 0, 0. 714. 0. 43, • 9, 19.30 .09 .00 7.65 .00 .045 .025 .045 .000 12,40 1261.54 .001917 920. 920. 950. 2 0 0 .00 138.84 1400,38 0 *SECNO 3382.000 3495 OVERBANK AREA ASSUMED NON-EFFECTIVE,ELLEA= 50.00 ELREA= 50,00 3382.00 7.71 19.91 .00 .00 20.77 .86 1.50 .00 18.40 5460, 0, 5460. 0. 0. 733. 0. 57. 12. 1860 .13 .00 7,45 .40 .045 .025 .045 .000 12.20 1232.00 .001620 850. 850, 840. 2 0 0 +00 130.90 1362,90 0 CCHV: .300 CEHV= .500 *SECNO 3902.000 • 3495 OVERBANK AREA ASSUMED NON-EFFEC?IVE,ELLEA= 25.50 ELREA= 25,50 5227 DOWNSTREAM ELEV IS . 11,67 ,NOT 12,993 HYDRAULIC JUMP OCCURS DOWNSTREAM (IF LOW FLOW CONTROLS) SD XK XKOR COFQ RDLEN BWC BWP BAREA SS ELCHU ELCHD t.PS 1.Stl 1,1)(1 Ofl to Oil.-_ -- A.tf(L t495 j8_ a0 SOUTH HI lMt; ORME 3902.00 6.95 20.95 .00 .00 21.62 .68 .79 .06 25.00 5460. 0. 5460, 0, 0. 828, 0. 66. 13. 25.00 .15 .00 6,60 .00 +045 .025 .045 ,000 14,00 1319,88 .001444 520, 520, 520. 2 0 0 .00 163,80 1483.69 0 1 04/20/87 13:53:44 PAGE 10 SECHO DEPTH CWSEL CRIWS WSELK EG NV HL OLOSS BANK ELEV QLOB QCH QROB ALOB ACH AROB VOL TWA LEFT/RIGHT TIME VLOB VCH VROB XML XNCH XNR WIN ELMIN SSTA • SLOPE XLOBL XLCH XLOBR ITRIAL IDC ICONT CORAR TOPWID ENDST SPECIAL BRIDGE SB XK XKOR COFQ RDLEN BWC BWP BAREA SS ELCHU ELCHD 1.25 1,80 3.00 .00 118.00 4.00 902,00 3,85 15,31 15.31 *SECNO 3964,000 CLASS A LOW FLOW 3420 BRIDGE W.S,= 20.88 BRIDGE VELOCITY=, 7,23 CALCULATED CHANNEL AREA:, 755, EGPRS EGLWC H3 QWEIR QLOW BAREA TRAPEZOID ELLC ELTRD AREA .00 21,69 .09 0. 5460. 902. 902, 21.80 25.50 3495 OVERBANK AREA ASSUMED NON-EFFECTIVE,ELLEA= 25.00 ELREA= 25,00 3964,00 7,04 21,04 .00 .00 21.69 .65 .07 .00 25.00 5460, 0. 5460. 0, 0. 842, 0, 67. 14. 25,00 • .15 .00 6.48 ,00 .000 .025 .000 .000 14.00 1319.84 .001369 62. 62, 62, 0 0 0 .00 164,31 1484.15 0 CCHV: .300 CEHV= ,800_ *SECHO 4114.000 • 3495 OVERBANK AREA ASSUMED NON-EFFECTIVE,ELLEA= 50,00 ELREA= 50.00 4114,00 6.72 21.22 .00 .00 22,03 .81 .22 .13 18.20 5460, 0. 5460. 0, 0, 756, 0. 70, 14, 22.30 .16 ,00 7,22 ,00 ,045 .025 .045 .000 14.50 1432,10 .001512 150, 150, 150, 2 0 0 .00 133.77 1565,87 . 0 CCHV= .100 CEHV= .300 *SECHO 4654.000 3495 OVERBANK AREA ASSUMED NON-EFFECTIVE,ELLEA= 50,00 ELREA= 50.00 4654,00 6,45 22.05 .00 .00 22.98 .93 .91 .04 21,70 5460. 0, 5460. 0, 0. 706. 0, 79. '16. 21,80 .18 .00 7.74 .00 .045 .025 .045 ,000 15.60 1492+30 4001883 540. 540, 540, 2 0 0 .00 132,30 1624,60 0 1 04/20/87 13:53:44 PAGE 11 SECNO DEPTH CWSEL CRIWS WSELK EG HV HL OLOSS BANK ELEV Q = --QLOB. _--- 4CH_ +?ROB -.BLOB . --ACH--=-- ---AROB----,- --VOL- ,-.TWA._ LEFT/RIGHT TIME VLOB UCH VROB XNL XNCH XNR WIN ELMIH SSTA SLOPE XLOBL XLCH XLOBR ITRIAL IDC ICON? CORAR TOPWID ENDST l'nUNU ) HOW 3495 OVERBANK AREA ASSUMED NOH-EFFECTIVE,ELLEA= 50,00 ELREA= 50,00 5244,00 6.76 23,16 .00 ,00 24.12 .95 1,13 .01 23,60 5460, 0, 5460. 0, 0, 696, 0. 89, 18. 22,40 .20 .00 7.84 .00 .045 .025 .045 .000 16,40 248,77 .001954 620, 590, 550, 2 0 0 .00 132.13 380,90 0 CCHV= .300 CEHV= .500 *SECNO 5644,000 3495 OVERBANK AREA ASSUMED NON-EFFECTIVE,ELLEA= 32,40 ELREA= 32,40 LOGAN AVENUE BRIDGE 5644,00 6,55 24.05 «00 .00 24,88 .84 .73 .04 26.10 5460, 0, 5460, 0, 0, 744. 0, 95. 19. 24,90 .21 .00 7,34 .00 .045 .025 .045 .000 17,50 37,88 .001725 410. 400, 400, 2 0 0 .00 143,21 181.09 0 SPECIAL BRIDGE SB XE XKOR COFQ RDLEN BWC BWP BAREA SS ELCHU ELCHD 1,25 2,00 3,00 .00 170,00 3.50 1243,00 .00 19,40 19.40 *SECNO 5762,000 CLASS A LOW FLOW 3420 BRIDGE W.S,= 24.00 BRIDGE VELOCITY=, 7.13 CALCULATED CHANNEL AREA:, 765. EGPRS EGLWC H3 QWEIR QLOW BAREA TRAPEZOID ELLC ELTRD AREA .00 24.96 .11 0, 5460, 1243. 1249, 26,90 32,40 3495 OVERBANK AREA ASSUMED NON-EFFECTIVE,ELLEA= 32,40 ELREA: 32.40 5762,00 6,65 24.15 .00 400 24,96 .80 .07 ,00 26.10 5460, 0. 5460, 0, 0, 759, 0, 97, 19, 24,90 .22 .00 7.19 .00 .000 .025 .000 .000 17,50 37,68 .001627 118. 118, , 118, 0 0 . 0 .00 144,02 181.70 0 1 04/20/87 13:53:44 PAGE 12 SECNO DEPTH CWSEL CRIWS WSELE EG NV HL OLOSS BANK ELEV BLOB QCH QROB ALOB ACH AROB VOL TWA LEFT/RIGHT TIME VLOB VCH VROB XNL XNCH XNR WTN ELMIN SSTA SLOPE XLOBL XLCH XLOBR ITRIAL IDC ICONT CORAR TOPWID ENDST *SECNO 6012,000 6012,00 6.38 24.48 .00 .00 25.64 1,17 ,50 .18 28,80 5460. 0. 5460, 0, 0, 630, 0, 101, 20. 29,80 .22 .00 8.67 .00 .045 .025 ,045 .000 18.10 31,15 *002571 250, 250, 250. 2 0 0 .00 124,86 156.01 0 *SECNO 6502,000 34Y) UVERUANK RUA ASSUMED NUN-EFFLUTIVE,ELLEA: d4.8U"ELREA= M.8U WILLIAMS AVENUE BRIDGE 6502,00 6,68 25.78 .00 ,00 26,84 1.06 1.16 ,03 34,80 5460. 0, 5460. 0. 0, 661. 0. 108. 21. 34.00 .24 .00 8.27 .00 .045 .025 ,045 .000 19,10 45.08 .002198 500. 490. 480, 2 0 0 .00 126,76 171.83 0 SPECIAL BRIDGE ' SB XK XKOR CDFQ RDLEN BWC BWP BAREA SS ELCHU ELCHD .90 1.30 3,00 .00 114,00 11,10 1296,00 1.26 20.00 20,00 *SECHO 6541,000 CLASS A LOW FLOW 3420 BRIDGE W,S,= 25.37 BRIDGE VELOCITY=, 9.27 CALCULATED CHANNEL AREA:, 589.. EGPRS EGLWC H3 QWEIR QLOW BAREA TRAPEZOID ELLC ELTRD AREA .00 27.08 .38 0. 5460. 1296. 1298. 31.10 34,80 3495 OVERBANK AREA ASSUMED NOH-EFFECTIVE,ELLEA= 34.80 ELREA: 34,80 6541,00 7.06 26.16 .00 ,00 27,08 .92 .24 .00 34.80 • 5460, 0, 5460. 0. 0. 710. 0, 109, 21, 34,00 .24 .00 7.69 .00 .000 .025 .000 ,000 19,10 44.11 .001763 39. 39, 39, 0 0 0 .00 128,32 172.43 0 *SECHO 6681,000 6681,00 6.98 26.38 .00 ,00 27,39 1.01 .27 ,05 31.30 5460, 0. 5460, 0. 0. 677. 0, 111, 22. 33.90 .25 .00 8,07 .00 .045 .025 .045 .000 19,40 13.55 .002038 140. 140, 150, 2 0 0 .00 124.75 138,30 0 1 04/20/87 13:53:44 PAGE 13 • SECHO DEPTH CWSEL CRIWS WSELK EG HV HL GLOSS BANK ELEV Ct QLOB QCH QROB ALOB ACH AROB VOL TWA LEFT/RIGHT TIME VLOB VCH VROB XNL XNCH XNR WIN ELMIN SSTA - SLOPE XLOBL XLCH XLOBR ITRIAL IDC ICONT CORAR TOPWID ENDST *SECHO 6921,000 6921.00 7,63 27.13 .00 .00 27.83 .70 .35 .09 35.90 5460, 0, 5460. 0. 0. 813. 0. 115, 23. 36.20 ,26 .00 6.72 .00 .045 .025' .045 .000 19.50 10.01 .001079 240. 240. 240. 2 0 0 .00 120,00 130.01 0 CCHV= .300 CEHU= .800 ' *SECHO 6931.000 3265 DIVIDED FLOW 3370 NORMAL BRIDGE,NRD: 14 MIN ELTRD= 35,90 MAX ELLC: 36.20 WELLS AVENUE BRIDGE 6931,00 7.64 27,14 .00 .00 27.85 .71 .01 .01 35.90 5460, 0, 5460, 0, 0, 805, 0. 116. 23. 36.20 • fv Tvl T4vV 401655 10, 10, 10. 0 .�v0 0 .00 117.00 130.01 0 *SECNO 6973.400 .. 3265 DIVIDED FLOW 33/0 NUNMAL HI{!VfiE,NHU= 14 MIN EMU= 37,Y0 MAX ELLU= 36,Et1 6973,00 7,73 27.23 .00 ,00 27,92 .70 .07 .01 35,90 5460, 0, 5460, 0, 0, 815, 0, 116, 23, 36,20 ,26 .00 6,70 . .00 ,045 ,030 .045 ,000 19,50 10.01 .001594 42, 42, 42, 2 0 0 40 117.00 130.01 0 *SECNO 6983,000 6983,00 7,77 27,27 .00 .00 27,94. ,67 .01 .01 35.90 5460, 0, 5460, 0, 0, 830, 0, 117, 23. 36.20 ,26 ,00 6,58 ,00 .045 .025 .045 ,000 19,50 10.01 .001009 10, 10, 10, 2 0 0 4.0 120.00 130,01 6 0 1 04/20/87 13:53:44 PAGE 14 SECNO DEPTH CWSEL CRIWS WSELK EG HV HL OLOSS BANK ELEV ((LOB QCH ((ROB ALOB ACH AROB VOL TWA LEFT/RIGHT TIME VLOB VCH VROB XNL XNCH XNR WTH ELMIN SSTA SLOPE XLOBL XLCH XLOBR ITRIAL IDC ICONT CORAR TOPWID ENDST CCHV= .100 CEHV= ,400 *SECNO 7103,000 7103,00 6,67 27,27 ,00 .00 28,22 .95 .16 ,11. 33.60 5460, 0, 5460, 0, 0, 699, 0, 119, 23. 27,90 • ,26 ,00 7,81 ,00 .045 ,025 ,045 .000 20,60 30,48 .,001946 120, 120, 130, 2 0 0 ,00 130,43 160,91 0 *SECNO 7483.000 7483,00 6,52 27.82 .00 .00 28,83 1.01 .59 ,02 35.00 5460, 0, 5460, 0, 0, 677, 0, 125, 24, 37.20 ,28 ,00 8,06 .00 .045 ,020 ,045 .000 21,30 29,84 #001262 370, 380, 380, 0 0 0 .00 121.86 151,71 0 CCHV= ,100 CEHV= .500 *SECNO 7643,000 3495 OVERBANK AREA ASSUMED NON-EFFECTIVE,ELLEA= 40,00 ELREA= 40,00 7643.00 6.30 28.00 ,00 .00 29.22 1.22 .28 ,10 22.20 5460, 0, 5460, 0, 0, 617, 0, 127, 25. 40,10 ,28 .00 8,86 ,00 .045 .028 ,045 ,000 21,70 50,00 ,002694 160. 160, 170, 2 0 0 ,00 104091 154.91 0 CCHV= .300 CEHV= 1800 *SECNO 7653.000 3370 NORMAL BRIDGE,NRD= 17 MIN ELTRD= 40,00 MAX ELLC= 40,10 , BRONSON WAY BRIDGE 7653.00 6,33 28,03 ,00 ,00 29.29 1.26 .03 .04 40,00 5460, 0, 5460, 0, 0, 605, 0, 127, 25, 40,10 128 ,00 9.02 A0 ,045 .035 ,045 ,000 21,70 50,01 '004671 10, 10, 10, 0 0 0 .00 99,50 149.50 0 *SECNO 7725,000 ;iiIU NUM, BIS1U4t,Nf{U= 1/ MIN MANY= 4U.UU i9HA t,LLL= 9U.lU 7725.00 6,74 28,44 .00 ,00 29.54 1.11 .21 .05 40.00 5460, 0, 5460. 0, 0. 647. 0, 128, 25. 40.10 ,28 .00 8,44 .00 .045 .025 .,045 .000 21.70 50,01 .001930 72. 72, 72, 2 0 0 .00 99,50 149.50 0 1 04/20/87 13:53:44 PAGE 15 SECHO DEPTH CWSEL CRIWS WSELK EG HV HL OLOSS BANK ELEV QLOB QCH QROB ALOB ACH AROB VOL TWA LEFT/RIGHT TIME VLOB VCH VROB XNL XHCH XHR WIN ELMIN SSTA SLOPE XLOBL XLCH XLOBR ITRIAL IDC ICONT CORAR TOPWID MOST *SECNO 7735,000 3495 OVERBANK AREA ASSUMED HON-EFFECTIVE,ELLEA= 40,00 ELREA: 40,00 7735,00 6,89 28,59 .00 .00 29,59 1.01 .02 .03 40.00 5460, 0. 5460, 0, 0, 678. 0. 128, 25. 40,10 ,28 .00 8,05 .00 .045 .025 .045 .000 21.70 50,01 .001708 10. 10. 10, 2 0 0 .00 105.55 155,56 0 *SECNO 7845.000 3495 OVERBANE AREA ASSUMED NON-EFFECTIVE,ELLEA= 50,00 ELREA: 50,00 LIBRARY 7845,00 7,49 28,89 .00 .00 29,80 .91 .18 .03 70.00 5460, 0, 5460, 0, 0, 712, 0, 130, 25. 39,00 .29 .00 7.67 .00 .045 .025 .045 .000 21.40 24.36 .001620 110. 110, 100, 2 0 0 .00 119,98 144.34 0 SPECIAL BRIDGE SB XE XKOR COFQ RDLEN BWC BWP BAREA SS ELCHU ELCHD 1,05 1.70 3,00 .00 101.00 6.00 1999,00 1.88 22,60 22,60 *SECNO 8002,000 CLASS A LOW FLOW 3420 BRIDGE W,S,= 28.71 BRIDGE VELOCITY=, 8.39 CALCULATED CHANNEL AREA:, 651. EGPRS EGLWC H3 QWEIR QLOW BAREA TRAPEZOID ELLC ELTRD AREA .00 29,94 .19 0. 5460. 1999. 2000. 38.60 50,00 3495 OVERBANK AREA ASSUMED NOH-EFFECTIVE,ELLEA: 50,00 ELREA= 50,00 8002.00 7.68 29.08 .00 .00 29.94 .86 .14 .00 40.00 5460, 0, 5460. 0, 0. 735. 0. 133. 25. 39.00 .29 .00 7,43 ,00 .000 .025 .000 .000 21.40 24,06 '001468 157. 157, 157, 0 0 0 .00 120.74 144,79 0 1 04/20/87 13:53:44 PAGE 16 SECHO DEPTH CWSEL CRIWS WSELK EG NV HL GLOSS BANK ELEV • • • • - - _ _ , - TIME VLOB UCH VROB XHL XNCH XNR WIN ELMIN SSTA SLOPE XLOBL XLCH XLOBR ITRIAL IBC ICOHT CORAR. TOPWID EHDST *SEGNO BORON 8092,00 7,02 29.22 .00 .00 30,30 1,08 .18 .18 31.90 5460, 0, 5460, 0, 0. 654. 0, 134, 26. 42.00 .30 .00 8,35 .00 .045 .030 .045 ,000 22.20 127,04 .002808 90. 90, 80, 0 0 0 .00 109.92 236,96 0 *SECNO 8402.000 3495 OVERBANK AREA ASSUMED NON-EFFECTIVE,ELLEA= 41.00 ELREA= 41,00 • HOUSER WAY BRIDGE 8402,00 8.46 30,06 .00 ,00 30.97 .91 .62 .05 32,10 5460, 0, 5460. 0, 0, 713, 0. 139, 27, 39.10 «31 .00 7,66 .00 .045 .025 .045 .000 21,60 31,04 • .001494 290, 310, 310, 2 0 0 .00 114.33 145.36 0 SPECIAL BRIDGE SB XK XKOR CON RDLEN BWC BWP BAREA SS ELCHU ELCHD 1.25 1.30 3,00 .00 83,00 4,00 1270.00 2.05 22.80 22.80 *SECNO 8436,000 • CLASS A LOW FLOW 3420 BRIDGE W,S.= 29,94 BRIDGE VELOCITY=, 8,17 • CALCULATED CHANNEL AREA:, 669, EGPRS EGLWC H3 QWEIR GLOW BAREA TRAPEZOID ELLC ELTRD AREA ,00 31,10 .18 0, 5460, 1270, 1269, 35,00 41.00 3495 OVERBANK AREA ASSUMED NON-EFFECTIVE,ELLEA= 41,00 ELREA: 41.00 8436,00 8,64 30.24 .00 .00 31,10 .86 .13 .00 32,10 5460, 0. 5460, 0, 0, 733. 0, 140, 27, 39,10 • .31 .00 7,45 .00 .000 .025 .000 .000 21,60 30,75 .001371. 34. 34. 34. 0 0 0 .00 114,85 145,60 0 CCHV: .300 CEHV: .870 1 04/20/87 13:53:44 PAGE 17 SECNO DEPTH CWSEL CRIWS WSELK EG HV HL OLOSS BANK ELEV Q QLOB qCH QROB ALOB ACH AROB VOL TWA LEFT/RIGHT TIME VLOB VCH UROB XNL XNCH XNR WIN ELMIN SSTA SLOPE XLOBL XLCH XLOBR ITRIAL IDC ICONT CORAR TOPWID ENDST *SECNO 8476,000 • RAILROAD BRIDGE 8476,00 10,77 30,27 .00 .00 31.34 1.07 .06 .18 45,50 5460, 0, 5460, 0, 0, 657, 0. 140, 27, 43,30 .31 .00 8.31 ,00 .045 .025 .045 .000 19,50 30,58 .001587 40. 40, 40, 2 0 0 .00 94.43 125,01 0 CCHV: .100 CEHV= .300 *SECNO 8596,000 3301 NV CHANGED MORE THAN HVINS I 405 8596,00 9,25 31,05 ,00 .00 31,62 ►56 ►22 ,05 34.60 5460, 0, 5460, 0, 0. 907, 0. 142. 27. 32,50 ,32 :00 6,02 .00 .050 .035 ,040 .000 21,80 73,49 .002213 160. 120, 100. 3 0 0 ►00 141,86 227,37 0 *SECNO 8836,000 8836,00 8,76 31,56 ►00 ,00 32,20 ,64 .56 02 48.80 5460. 0, 5460► 0, 0. 850. 0. 147. 28. 34,80 .33 .00 .6.42 .00 ,050 .035 .040 .000 22,80 33,81 .002492 230, 240. 230, 2 0 0 40 154,44 189,25 0 *SECNO 9446,000 9446.00 8,61 33,21 .00 .00 33,96 ,75 1.73 .03 49,80 5460, 0, 5460, 0, 0, 784. 0, 159, 30, 34.30 .35 .00 6,96 .00 ,050 ,044 ,050 400 24,60 25►75 403251 570. 610, 650, 2 0 0 .00 109,34 135,09 0 *SECNO 10236,000 10236,00 8.29 35,69 .00 .00 36.27 .57 2.28 .02 55,00 5460. 0. 5460, 0, 0, 898, 0. 174, 32. 40,20 .39 ,00 6,08 .00 +050 ,044 .050 ,000 27.40 40,83 .002589 800, 790, 740, 2 0 0 .00 130,29 171,12 0 1 04/20/87 13:53:44 PAGE 18 SECNO DEPTH .CWSEL CRIWS . WSELK EG NV HL OLOSS DANK ELEV QLOB QCH QROB ALOB ACH AROB VOL TWA LEFT/RIGHT TIME VLOB UCH VROB XML XNCH XNR WTN ELMIN SSTA SLOPE XLOBL XLCH XLOBR ITRIAL IDC ICONT CORAR TOPWID ENDST *SECNO 11156,000 11156,00 10.26 37►96 .00 .00 38,69 .72 2,37 .05 41.30 5460, 0. 5460, 0, 0. 799, 0, 192, 34, 38,90 .43 .00 6,83 ,00 .050 .044 ,050 .000 27,70 12.79 .002574 820. 920, 970, 2 0 0 .00 94.61 107,40 0 1 04/20/87 13:53:44 PAGE 19 THIS RUN EXECUTED 04/20/87 13:57:11 *****KKKKK** ********KKKK***** ****** }*****KKKKx HEC2 RELEASE DATED NOV 76 UPDATED MAY 1984 ERROR CORR - 01,02,03,04,05,06 MODIFICATION - 50,51,52,53,54,55,56 IBM-PC-XT VERSION ************%xu********************************** T1 RENTON FIS - SEPT 1986 - 319999,D0 T2 MULTIPLE PROFILE RUN T3 CEDAR RIVER-50 YR FLOW J1 ICHECK INQ NINV IDIR STRT METRIC HVINS Q WSEL FQ J2 NPROF IPLOT PRFVS XSECV XSECH FN ALLDC IBW CHNIM ITRACE 2,000 .000 -1,000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 1 04/20/87 13:53:44 PAGE 20 SECHO DEPTH CWSEL CRIWS WSELK EG HV HL GLOSS BANK ELEV QLOB QCH BOB ALOB ACH AROB VOL TWA LEFT/RIGHT TIME VLOB VCH UROB XNL XNCH XNR WTN ELMIN SSTA SLOPE XLOBL XLCH XLOBR ITRIAL IDC ICONT CORAR TOPWID ENDS? *PROF 2 CCHV: .300 CEHV= 1.000 *SECHO .100 3495 OVERBANK AREA ASSUMED NON-EFFECTIVE,ELLEA: 22.70 ELREA: 22.70 LAKE WASHINGTON .10 11.08 13.88 .00 14.00 15.28 1.40 .00 .00 17.40 7580, O. 7580. 0, 0. 799, 0. 0, 0. 18.20 .00 .00 9.49 .00 .035 .025 .035 .000 2.80 36.01 .003027 0. 0, 0. 0 0 3 .00 154.23 190.23 0 CCHV .300 CEHV= .500 SPECIAL BRIDGE 5227 DOWNSTREAM ELEV IS 12.35 ,NOT 13.88 HYDRAULIC JUMP OCCURS DOWNSTREAM (IF LOW FLOW CONTROLS) SB XK XKOR COFQ RDLEN BWC BWP BAREA SS ELCHU ELCHD 1.25 1.50 3.00 .00 160.00 8.00 1495.00 .00 8.90 8.90 *SECNO 62.000 CLASS B LOW FLOW 3420 BRIDGE W.S.: 13.16 BRIDGE 'VELOCITY:, 11.71 CALCULATED CHANNEL AREA:, 647. EGPRS EGLWC H3 QWEIR QLOW BAREA TRAPEZOID ELLC ELTRD AREA .00 15.44 .00 0. 7580. 1495, 1490, 18.70 22.70 3495 OVERDANE AREA ASSUMED NOH-EFFECTIVE,ELLEA: 22.70 ELREA: 22.70 U/S END OF NORTH BOEING BRIDGE 62.00 11.40 14.20 .00 .00 15,44 1.24 .16 .00 17.40 7580, 0, 7580, 0. 0, 849. 0, 1. 0. 18.20 .00 8.93 .00 .000 .025 .000 .000 2.80 35.30 .002493 62. 62, 62, 0 0 0 .00 155.00 190,30 0 *SECNO 892.000 892.00 6.03 16.33 .00 .00 17.74 1.41 2.21 .09 18.60 7580. O. 7580. 0. 0. 794. 0. 17. 3. 17.40 .03 .00 9.54 .00 .035 .025 .035 .000 10.30 112.83 .002860 840. 830. 830. 2 0 0 .00 146.07 258.90 0 1 04/20/87 13:53:44 PAGE 21 SELf9U um. GWSEL URNS WSELK EG HV HL ULUSS BAH ELEV QLOB QCH QROB ALOB ACH AROB VOL - TWA LEFT/RIGHT TIME VLOB VCH VROB XHL XNCH XHR WIN ELMIN SSTA SLOPE XLOBL XLCH XLOBR ITRIAL IDC ICONT CORAR TOPWID ENDST CCHV= .100 CEHV= .300 *SECNO 1612.000 3265 DIVIDED FLOW 3301 HV CHANGED MORE THAN HVINS 1612,00 7.30 18.30 .00 .00 19,12 .82 1.32 .06 18.40 7580. 0, 7533, 47, 0, 1034, 39, 32, 6, 16,40 .05 .00 7.28 1,21 .045 .025 .045 .000 11,00 261.57 .001278 720, 720, 740, 2 0 0 ,00 206,34 591.96 0 *SECNO 2532,000 3495 OVERBANK AREA ASSUMED NON-EFFECTIVE,ELLEA= 50,00 ELREA= 50.00 _ 2532.00 7,09 19.49 ,00 .00 20,66 1.17 1,44 .11 19,10 7580. 0, 7580. 0, 0, 873, 0. 53, 10, , 19,30 .08 .00 8,68 .00 .045 .025 445 .000 12,40 1260,50 .001947 920, 920. 950, 2 0 0 .00 141,40 1401,90 0 *SECNO 3382,000 3495 OVERBANK AREA ASSUMED NOH-EFFECTIVE,ELLEA= 50,00 ELREA= 50,00 ' 3382,00 8.86 21.06 .00 ,00 22,20 1,14 1,53 .00 18,40 7580. 0, 7580, 0, 0, 884, 0, 70, 12. 18,50 .11 .00 8.58 .00 ,045 .025 .045 .000 12.20 1232,00 .001675 850, 850, 840, 3 0 0 .00 130,90 1362,90 0 CCHV= .300 CEHV= .500 *SECNO 3902,000 3280 CROSS SECTION 3902,00 EXTENDED .95 FEET 3495 OVERBANK AREA ASSUMED HON-EFFECTIVE,ELLEA= 25.50 ELREA= .25.50 • SOUTH BOEING BRIDGE • 3902,00 8,25 22.25 .00 .00 23.07 .82 .77 .10 25,00 7580. 0, 7580, 0, 0, 1044, 0, 81, 14, 25,00 .13 .00 7,26 .00 .045 .025 '045 .000 14.00 1319,28 '001327 520, 520. 520, 2 0 0 .00 166,28 1485.55 0 1 04/20/87 13:53:44 PAGE 22 SECNO DEPTH CWSEL CRIWS WSELK EG HV HL GLOSS BANK ELEV QLOB QCH QROB ALOB ACH AROB VOL TWA LEFT/RIGHT TIME VLOB VCH VROB XNL ' XNCH XNR WIN ELMIN SSTA SLOPE XLOBL XLCH XLOBR ITRIAL IDC ICONT CORAR TOPWID ENDST SPECIAL BRIDGE SB XX XKOR COFQ RDLEN BWC BWP BAREA SS ELCHU ELCHD 1,25 1.80 3,00 .00 118.00 4,00 902.00 3.85 15.31 15,31 *bh6NU 6YO4,UUG 3280 CROSS SECTION 3964,00 EXTENDED 2,39 FEET PRESSURE FLOW EGPRS EGLWC H3 QWEIR QPR BAREA TRAPEZOID ELLC ELTRD AREA 24,22 23.15 ,10 0, 7580, 902. 902, 21,80 25,50 3495 OVERBANK AREA ASSUMED NOH-EFFECTIVE,ELLEA= 25,00 ELREA= 25,00 3964,00 9.68 23,68 .00 .00 24.22 .54 1.15 .00 25,00 7580, 0. 7580. 0. 0, 1283. 0. 83, 14. 25.00 .13 .00 5.91 .00 .000 .025 .000 .000 14,00 1318,61 .000683 62. 62. 62, 2 0 0 .00 167.70 1486,31 0 CCHV= . .300 CEHV= .800 *SECNO 4114,000 3495 OVERBANK AREA ASSUMED NON-EFFECTIVE,ELLEA= 50,00. ELREA= 50,00 4114.00 9.26 23.76 .00 .00 24.50 .74 .11 .16 18,20 7580, 0. 7580. 0, 0, 1099, 0, 87, 15. 22,30 .14 .00 6.90 .00 .045 .025 ,045 .000 14,50 1432.10 .000855 150. 150, 150, 2 0 0 .00 135+20 1567,30 0 CCHV= ,100 CEHV: .300 *SECNO 4654.000 3495 OVERBANK AREA ASSUMED NON-EFFECTIVE,ELLEA= 50,00 ELREA= 50.00 4654.00 8.57 24,17 ,00 ,00 25.09 .92 .54 .05 21,70 7580. 0. 7580. 0, 0, 987, 0, 100, 17. 21,80 .16 .00 7.68 .00 .045 .025 .045 .000 15.60 1492.30 .001186 540, 540, 540, 0 0 0 .00 132,30 1624.60 0 1 04/20/87 13:53:44 PAGE 23 SECNO DEPTH CWSEL CRIWS WSELK EG HV HL GLOSS BANK ELEV Q QLOB QCH ROB ALOB ACH AROB VOL TWA LEFT/RIGHT TIME VLOB UCH VROB XHL XHCH XNR WIN ELMIN SSTA SLOPE XLOBL XLCH XLOBR ITRIAL IDC ICONT CORAR TOPWID ENDST *SECNO 5244,000 3495 OVERBANK AREA ASSUMED NON-EFFECTIVE,ELLEA= 50,00 ELREA= 50,00 5244,00 8.46 24,86 .00 .00 25,91 1,05 .78 .04 23,60 7580, 0, 7580, • 0. 0, 922, 0. 113, 18. 22.40 .18 .00 8,22 .00 .045 .025 .045 .000 16.40 248.30 '001488 620, 590+ 550, 2 0 0 +00 132,60 380,90 0 CCHV= .300 CEHV= .500 *SECNO 5644,000 3495 OVERBANK AREA ASSUMED NON-EFFECTIVE,ELLEA= 32,40 ELREA= 32,40 LOGAN AVENUE BRIDGE 5644,00 8,09 25.59 .00 .00 26,53 .94 .59 .03 26,10 .1Y ,UU /./Y .UU ,U4D On 047 OM I/,5U MOM .001464 410. 400, 400. 2 0 0 .00 151.04 186,00 0 SPECIAL BRIDGE SB XK XKOR COFQ RDLEN BWC BWP BAREA SS ELCHU ELCHD 1.25 2.00 3,00 .40 170,00 3.50 1243.00 .00 19,40 19.40 *SECNO 5762,000 CLASS A LOW FLOW 3420 BRIDGE W.S.= 25,54 BRIDGE VELOCITY:, 7,41 CALCULATED CHANNEL AREA:, 1022, EGPRS EGLWC H3 QWEIR QLOW BAREA TRAPEZOID ELLC ELTRD AREA .00 26.61 .111 0, 7580, 1243, 1249, 26.90 32,40 • 3495 OVERBANK AREA ASSUMED NON-EFFECTIVE,ELLEA: 32,40 ELREA: 32,40 5762,00 8.20 25.70 .00 .00 26,61. .91 .08 .00 26.10 7580, 0, . 7580, 0, 0. 989, 0, 124. 20. 24.90 .20 .00 7,67 40 .000 .025 .000 .000 17,50 34►76 .001391 118, 118, 118, 0 0 0 .00 151.24 186,00 0 1 04/20/87 13:53144 PAGE 24 SECNO DEPTH CWSEL CRIWS WSELK EG HV HL GLOSS BANE ELEV QLOB QCH QROB ALOB ACH AROB VOL TWA LEFT/RIGHT TIME • VLOB UCH VROB XNL XNCH XNR WIN ELMIN SSTA SLOPE XLOBL XLCH XLOBR ITRIAL IDC ICON! CORAR , TOPWID ENDST *SECNO 6012,000 6012.00 7,82 25,92 +00 .00 27,27 1,35 .44 .22 28.80 7580. 0, 7580, 0. 0. 813. 0, 130, . 21, 29,80 .20 .00 .9.32 ,00 .045 .025 ,045 ,000 18,10 29.43 .002272 250. 250, 250, 2 0 0 ►00 130,67 160,10 ' 0 *SECHD 6502.000 3495 OVERBANK AREA ASSUMED NON-EFFECTIVE,ELLEA: 34,80 ELREA: 34,80 WILLIAMS AVENUE BRIDGE 6502,00 7,94 27,04 .00 ,00 28.36 1.31 1,08 .01 34,80 7580, 0. 7580. 0. 0, 824. 0. 139, 22, 34.00 .22 .00 9.20 .00 .045 .025 .045 .000 19.10 41,89 .002135 500, 490, 480. 3 0 0 .00 130,61 172,50 . 0 SPECIAL BRIDGE SB XK XKOR CDFQ RDLEN BWC BWP BAREA SS ELCHU ELCHD .90 1,30 3.00 ,00 114.00 11,10 1296.00 1,26 20,00 20,00 *SECNO 6541,000 CLASS A LOW FLOW 3420 BRIDGE W,S,: 26,50 BRIDGE VELOCITY:, 10,49 CALCULATED CHANNEL AREA:, 723, EGPRS EGLWC H3 QWEIR QLOW BAREA TRAPEZOID ELLC ELTRD ,00 28.65 .47 0, 7580, 1296, 1298, 31+10 34,80 3495 OVERBANK AREA ASSUMED NON-EFFECTIVE,ELLEA= 34,80 ELREA= 34,80 +6541,00 8,41 27,51 ,00 ,00 28,65 1,14 ,29 ,00 34,80 7580, 0, 7580, 0, 0, 886+ 0, 140, 22, 34,00 ,22 ,00 8,56 .00 .000 ,025 ,000 .000 19,10 40,71 ,001707 39, 39. 39, 0 0 0 ,00 131,80 172,51 0 *SECNO 6681,000 6681,00 8,31 27,71 .00 ,00 28,96 1,25 ,25 .06 31,30 7580, 0. 7580, 0, 0, 844, 0. 142, 23, 33,90 .23 ,00 8,98 .00 .045 +025 ,045 .000 19,40 12.46 '001945 140, 140, 150, 2 0 0 .00 125,85 138,30 0 1 04/20/87 13:53:44 PAGE 25 SECNO DEPTH CWSEL CRIWS WSELK EG HV HL GLOSS BANK ELEV [(LOB RCH QROB ALOB ACH AROB VOL TWA LEFT/RIGHT TIME VLOB VCH VROB XNL XNCH XNR WIN ELMIN SSTA SLOPE XLOBL XLCH XLOBR ITRIAL IDC ICONT CORAR TOPWID ENDST *SECNO 6921.000 6921.00 8,99 28.49 400 ,00 29,42 ,93 ,36 .10 35,90 7580, 0, 7580, 0, 0, 981,, 0. 147, 24, 36+20 ,23 ,00 7.73 ,00 ,045 ,025 ,045 .000 19,50 10,01 '001189 240. 240, 240, 2 0 0 +00 123,99 134.00 0 CCHV= ,300 CEHV= .800 *SECNO 6931,000 3265 DIVIDED FLOW 3370 NORMAL BRIDGE,NRD= 14 MIN ELTRD= 35,90 MAX ELLC= 36,20 WELLS AVENUE BRIDGE 6931,00 9,00 28,50 ,00 .00 29.45 ,95 .01 +02 35,90 7580, 0, 7580, 0, 0, 969, 0, 148, 24. 36,20 .23 ,00 7,82 ,00 .045 ,030 ,045 400 19,50 10,01 .001886 10, 10. 10, 0 0 0 .00 121.00 134+00 0 *SECNO 6973,000 3265 DIVIDED FLOW 3370 NORMAL BRIDGE,NRD= 14 MIN ELTRD= 35,90 MAX ELLC= 36,20 6973,00 9,11 28,61 +00 ,00 29,54 ,93 .08 .01 35,90 7580, 0+ 7580, 0, 0, 981, 0, 149, 24, 36,20 ,24 $00 7,72 ,00 ,045 .030 .045 ,000 19,50 10,01 #001814 42. 42, 42, 2 0 0 ,00 121,00 134,00 0 *SECNO 6983,000 6983,00 9.18 28.68 .00 +00 29,56 ,89 . .01 .01 35,90 7580, 0, 7580, 0, 0+ 1004, 0, 149, 24, 36,20 +24 ,00 7.55 .00 +045 +025 ,045 ,000 19,50 10,01 .001106 10, 10, 10, 2 0 0 .00 123,99 134,00 0 04/a/8/ 13n3:44 FRIA Lb SECNO DEPTH CWSEL CRIWS WSELK EG HV HL GLOSS BANK ELEV QLOB QCH QROB ALOB ACH AROB VOL TWA LEFT/RIGHT TIME VLOB VCH VROB XNL XNCH XHR WTH ELMIN SSTA SLOPE XLOBL XLCH XLOBR ITRIAL IDC ICOHT CORAR TOPWID ENDST CCHV= .100 CEHV= +400 *SECNO 7103.000 7103.00 8.09 28.69 .00 .00 29.83 1.13 +17 .10 33.60 7580. 0. 7576. 4. 0. 887. 4. 151. 24. 27.90 .24 .00 8.54 1.13 .045 .025 .045 .000 20.60 26.89 .001764 120. 120. 130+ 2 0 0 .00 138.01 164.90 0 *SECNO 7483.000 7483.00 7.88 29.18 .00 .00 30.43 1.25 .56 .05 35.00 7580. 0. 7580. 0. 0. 846. 0. 159. 25. 37.20 .25 .00 8.96 .00 .045 .020 .045 .000 21.30 28.05 .001244 370. 380. 380. 2 0 0 .00 126.95 155.00 0 CCHV= .100 CEHV= .500 *SECNO 7643.000 3495 OVERBANK AREA ASSUMED NON-EFFECTIVE,ELLEA= 40.00 ELREA= 40.00 7643.00 7.61 29.31 .00 .00 30.87 1.57 .28 .16 22.20 7580. 0. 7580. 0. 0. 754, 0. 162. 26. 40.10 .26 .00 10.05 .00 .045 .028 .045 .000 21.70 50.00 .002716 160. 160. 170. 2 0 0 .00 106.35 156.35 0 CCHV= .300 CEHV= .800 *SECNO 7653.000 3370 NORMAL BRIDGE,NRD= 17 MIN ELTRD 40,00 MAX ELLC: 40.10 BRONSON WAY BRIDGE 7653.00 7.63 29.33 .00 .00 30.98 1.65 .04 .07 40.00 7580. 0. 7580. 0. 0. 735, 0. 162. 26. 40,10 .26 .00 10.31 .00 .045 .035 .045 .000 21.70 50.01 .004861 10. 10. 10. 0 0 0 .00 99.50 149.51 0 #SECNO 7725.000 3370 NORMAL BRIDGE,NRD= 17 MIN ELTRD: 40.00 MAX ELLC: 40,10 7725,00 8,09 29.79 .00 .00 31.25 1.46 .22 .06 40.00 7580, 0, 7580. 0. 0. 781, 0, 163, 26, 40.10 .26 .00 9.70 .00 .045 .025 .045 .000 21,70 50.01 4002046 72, 72, 72, 2 0 0 .00 99.50 149,51 0 1 04/20/87 13053:44 PAGE 27 SECNO DEPTH CWSEL CRIWS WSELK EC NV HL OLOSS BANK ELEV QLOB QCH (ROB ALOB ACH AROB VOL TWA LEFT/RIGHT TIME VLOB VCH VROB XNL XNCH XNR WTN ELMIN SSTA SLOPE XLOBL XLCH XLOBR ITRIAL IDC ICONT CORAR TOPWID ENDST *SECNO 7735.000 3495 OVERBANK AREA ASSUMED NON-EFFECTIVE,ELLEA= 40.00 ELREA= 40.00 //,i?,UU t}.34 3U,U4 .U9 .UU J1.,it 1.tY .Uif .U5 40rUU • 7580. 0, 7580, 0, 0. 833, 0. 164, 26. 40.10 .26 .00 9,10 .00 .045 .025 .045 .000 21.70 50.01 .001847 10, 10, 10. 2 0 0 ,00 113,21 163,21 0 *SECNO 7845,000 3495 OVERBANK AREA ASSUMED NON-EFFECTIVE,ELLEA= 50,00 ELREA: 50,00 LIBRARY 7845,00 9.11 30,51 .00 ,00 31,58 1.06 .19 .07 40.00 7580, 0, 7580, 0, 0, 917, 0, 166, 26, 39,00 ,26 ,00 8,27 .00 .045 425 .045 .000 21,40 14,45 .001555 110. 110, 100. 2 0 0 .00 133,68 148,14 0 SPECIAL BRIDGE SB XK XKOR COFQ RDLEN BWC BWP BAREA SS ELCHU ELCHD 1,05 1,70 3,00 .00 101,00 6,00 1999.00 1,88 22.60 22,60 *SECNO 8002.000 CLASS A LOW FLOW 3420 BRIDGE W,S,= 30,32 BRIDGE VELOCITY=, 8,96 CALCULATED CHANNEL AREA:, 846. EGPRS EGLWC H3 QWEIR QLOW BAREA TRAPEZOID ELLC ELTRD AREA ,00 31.72 .21 0, 7580, 1999, 2000, 38,60 50,00 3495 OVERBANK AREA ASSUMED HOH-EFFECTIVE,ELLEA= 50.00 ELREA= 50,00 8002.00 9,32 30.72 .00 .00 31.72 1.00 .15 .00 40.00 7580. 0, 7580, 0, 0, 944, 0. 169, 27. 39.00 .27 .00 8,03 00 .000 .025 .000 .000 21,40 14,37 .001421 157. 157, 157, 0 0 0 .00 134,23 148,61 0 1 04/20/87 13:53s44 PAGE 28 SECHO DEPTH CWSEL CRIWS WSELK EC NV HL OLOSS BANK ELEV QLOB RCN QROB ALOB ACH AROB VOL TWA LEFT/RIGHT TIME VLOB VCH VROB XHL XNCH XHR WTH ELMIN SSTA SLOPE XLOBL XLCH XLOBR 'TRIAL IDC ICON? CORAR TOPWID ENDST *SECHO 8092,000 8092.00 8.64 30,84 .00 .00 32,11 1.27 .17 .21 31.90 7580, 0, 7580, 0, 0. 838, 0. 171. 27. 42,00 .27 .00 9,04 .00 .045 .030 .045 .000 22,20 125,92 .002705 90, 90, 80, 1 0 0 .00 120,79 246,71 0 *SECNO 8402.000 3495 OVERBANK AREA ASSUMED NON-EFFECTIVE,ELLEA= 41,00 ELREA: 41.00 HOUSER WAY BRIDGE 8402,00 10.04 31,64 .00 .00 32,75 1.11 .59 .05 32.10 7580, 0, 7580, 0. 0, 898, 0. 177, 28. 39.10 .28 .00 8.45 .00 .045. ,025 .045 .000 21.60 28.44 '001422 290, 310, 310, 2 0 0 .00 119,06 147,51 0 etL1HL nitIVUE SB XE XKOR COFQ RDLEH BWC BWP BAREA SS ELCHU ELCHD 1.25 1.30 3,00 .00 83,00 4,00 1270.00 2.05 22.80 22.80 *SECNO 8436,000 CLASS A LOW FLOW 3420 BRIDGE W,S,= 31.50 BRIDGE VELOCITY:, 8,99 CALCULATED CHANNEL AREA:, 843, EGPRS EGLWC H3 WEIR QLOW BAREA TRAPEZOID ELLC ELTRD AREA .00 32.90 ,21 0, 7580, 1270, 1269. 35,00 41,00 a 3495 OVERBANK AREA ASSUMED NON-EFFECTIVE,ELLEA: 41.00 ELREA= 41,00 8436,00 10,25 31,85 .00 40 32,90 1,05 .15 .00 32.10 7580, 0, 7580, 0, 0,. 922, 0. 178, 28, 39,10 .28 .00 8,22 .00 ,000 .025 .000 .000 21.60 28.11 .401309 34, 34. 34, 0 0 0 .00 119,68 147,79 0 CCHV= .300 CEHV: .870 1 04/20/87 13:53:44 PAGE 29 SECNO DEPTH CWSEL CRIWS WSELK EG HV HL OLOSS BANK ELEV QLOB QCH QROB ALOB ACH AROB VOL TWA LEFT/RIGHT TIME VLOB VCH VROB XNL XNCH XHR WIN ELMIN SSTA SLOPE XLOBL XLCH XLOBR ITRIAL IBC ICONT CORAR TOPWID ENDST *SECNO 8476.000 RAILROAD BRIDGE 8476,00 12,37 31,87 .00 .00 33,22 1.35 .06 ,26 45.50 7580, 0, 7580, 0, 0, 812, 0, 179, 28. 43,30 .28 .00 9,33 ,00 .045 .025 .045 ,000 19,50 28,09 *001632 40, 40, 40, 2 0 0 40 99,80 127,89 0 CCHV= .100 CEHV: .300 *SECNO 8596.000 3265 DIVIDED FLOW 3301 NV CHANGED MORE THAN HVIHS I-405 8596,00 11.06 32.86 .00 .00 33,51 .65 422 .07 34.60 7580. 0. 7580. 0, 0, 1168. 0. 181. 28. 32.50 .29 .00 6,49 62 .050 ,035 .040 .000 21.80 71,26 .002027 160. 120. 100. 3 0 0 .00 148.47 231,74 0 *SECNO 8836,000 8836,00 10.50 33.30 .00 .00 34,01 ,71 .48 .02 48,80 7580. 0, 7580, 0. 0. 1120, 0, 188. 29, 34,80 .30 ,00 6,77 .00 .050 .035 ,040 .000 22.80 31,37 '001994 230, 240, 230, 1 0 0 .00 157.49 188,86 0 *SECHO 9446,000 3265 DIVIDED FLOW /58U. U, /78U, U. U. Y9/. 1. ZUZ. :il. jq,3U .32 ,00 8,00 .53 .050 ,044 .050 .000 24,60 24,21 .003497 570, 610, 650, 2 0 0 .00 118,04 157.93 0 *SECHO 10236.000 10236,00 9.93 37,33 .00 ,00 38.05 ,72 2,35 .03 55.00 7580, 0, 7580, 0. 0. 1115, 0. 221, 33. 40.20 .35 .00 6,80 ,00 .050 .044 .050 .000 27,40 39,08 .002557 800, 790, 740,' 2 0 0 .00 134.61 173.69 0 1 04/20/87 13:53:44 PAGE 30 SECHO DEPTH CWSEL CRIWS WSELK EG NV HL OLOSS BANK ELEV GLOB QCH QROB ALOB ACH AROB VOL TWA LEFT/RIGHT TIME VLOB VCH VROB XNL XNCH XNR WIN ELMIN SSTA SLOPE XLOBL XLCH XLOBR ITRIAL IDC ICON? CORAR TOPWID ENDST *SECNO 11156,000 11156,00 11.93 39,63 .00 .00 40,59 .96 2,47 .07 41,30 7580, 0, 7565. 15. 0, 960. 17. 243. 36. 38,90 .38 .00 7,88 .91 .050 .044 .050 .000 27,70 11,40 .002820 820, 920, 970, 2 0 0 .00 136,96 148,36 0 04/20/87 13:53:44 PAGE 31 THIS RUN EXECUTED 04/20/87 13:59:06 XXXXXXxXX#####i( AXXXXxXXXXXXXMUXXXXXXxXXHXxx# HEC2 RELEASE DATED NOV 76 UPDATED MAY 1984 ERROR CORR - 01,02,03,04,05,06 MODIFICATION - 50,51,52,53,54,55,56 IBM-PC-XT VERSION ###xitXX########################*############xxxx## T1 RENTON FIS - SEPT 1986 - 519989.D0 T2 MULTIPLE PROFILE RUN T3 CEDAR RIVER-100 YR FLOW J1 ICHECK INQ NINV IDIR STRT METRIC HVINS Q WSEL FQ -10. 4. 0. 0. $003000 .00 .0 8530, 14,000 .000 J2 NPROF IPLOT PRFVS XSECV XSECH FH ALLDC IBW CHHIM ITRACE 3.000 .000 -1.000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 1 04/20/87 13:53:44 PAGE 32 SECHO DEPTH CWSEL CRIWS WSELK EG HV HL OLOSS BANK ELEV Q GLOB QCH GROB ALOB ACH AROB VOL TWA LEFT/RIGHT TIME VLOB VCH VROB XNL XNCH XNR WIN ELMIN SSTA SLOPE XLOBL XLCH XLOBR ITRIAL IDC ICONT CORAR TOPWID ENDST *PROF 3 *SECNU .100 3495 OVERBANK AREA ASSUMED NON-EFFECTIVE,ELLEA= 22.70 ELREA: 22.70 LAKE WASHINGTON .10 11.46 14.26 .00 14.00 15.80 1.53 .00 .00 17.40 8530, 0, 8530, 0. 0, 858, 0. 0, 0. 18,20 .00 ,00 9,94 .00 .035 .025 .035 .000 2.80 35.17 .003047 0. 0, 0. 0 0 3 ,00 155,14 190,31 0 CCHV= .300 CEHV= .500 SPECIAL BRIDGE 5227 DOWNSTREAM ELEV IS 12.63 ,NOT 14,26 HYDRAULIC JUMP OCCURS DOWNSTREAM (IF LOW FLOW CONTROLS) SB XK XKOR COFQ RDLEN BWC BWP BAREA SS ELCHU ELCHD 1,25 1,50 3.00 ' .00 160.00 8,00 1495.00 .00 8.90 8.90 *SECNO 62,000 CLASS B LOW FLOW 3420 BRIDGE W,S,= 13.51 BRIDGE VELOCITY:, 12.18 CALCULATED CHANNEL AREA:, 700, EGPRS EGLWC H3 QWEIR GLOW BAREA TRAPEZOID ELLC ELTRD AREA .00 15,98 .00 0. 8530, 1495, 1490. 18.70 22.70 3495 OVERBANK AREA ASSUMED NON-EFFECTIVE,ELLEA= 22.70 ELREA= 22,70 U/S END OF NORTH BOEING BRIDGE 62,00 11.84 14,64 .00 .00 15,98 1.35 .18 .00 17.40 8530. 0. 8530, 0. 0, 916, 0. 1, 0, 18.20 .00 .00 9.31 .00 .000 .025 .000 4000 2.80 34.43 .002475 62. 62. 62. 0 0 0 .00 155.94 190.37 0 *SECNO 892.000 892.00 6,45 16.75 .00 .00 18.29 1,54 2.21 .10 18.60 8530. 0. 8530. 0, 0, 856. 0. 18, 3, 17,40 .02 .00 9,97 ,40 .035 .025 ,035 .000 10.30 111,85 .002871 840, 830. 830. 2 0 0 ,00 147,79 259.64 0 1 04/20/87 13:53:44 PAGE 33 SECNO DEPTH CWSEL CRIWS WSELK EG HV HL GLOSS BANK ELEV GLOB QCH ((ROB ALOB ACH AROB VOL TWA LEFT/RIGHT TIME VLOB VCH VROB XNL XNCH XNR WTN ELMIN SSTA SLOPE XLOBL XLCH XLOBR ITRIAL IDC ICONT CORAR TOPWID EHDST CCHV= .100 CEHV: .300 *SECNO 1612,000 3265 DIVIDED FLOW 3301 HV CHANGED MORE THAN HVINS 1612.00 7.79 18.79 .00 .00 19,67 ,89 1.32 .07 18.40 8530, 1, 8436, 93, 2, 1111, 67. 35. 6. 16.40 .05 139 7.60 1.39 .045 .025 .045 .000 11,00 252.85 0 *SECNO 2532,000 3495 OVERBANK AREA ASSUMED NON-EFFECTIVE,ELLEA: 50.00 ELREA: 50.00 2532.00 7,53 19.93 .00 .00 21.22 1,29 1.43 ,12 19.10 8530. 0. 8530. 0. 0. 935. 0. 57. 10. 19,30 .08 .00 9.12 ,00 .045 .025 445 ,000 12.40 1260.50 .001959 920. 920. 950. 2 0 0 .00 141,40 1401.90 0 *SECNO 3382.000 3495 OVERBAHE AREA ASSUMED HOH-EFFECTIVE,ELLEA= 50,00 ELREA: 50,00 3382.00 .9.31 21,51 .00 .00 22,78 1.27 1.56 .00 18.40 8530. 0. 8530. 0, 0. 942. 0. 76, 13. 18.50 .11 .00 9.06 .00 .045 .025 .045 .000 12.20 1232.00 .001715 850. 850. 840, 2 0 0 .00 130.90 1362,90 0 CCHV= .300 CEHV: ,500 *SECNO 3902,000 3280 CROSS SECTION . 3902.00 EXTENDED 1.49 FEET 3495 OVERBANK AREA ASSUMED NON-EFFECTIVE,ELLEA: 25,50 ELREA: 25.50 SOUTH BOEING BRIDGE 3902.00 8,79 22.79 .00 .00 23,67 .88 .77 .12 25.00 8530, 0. 8530, 0. 0, 1134. 0. 88. 15. 25.00 ,12 .00 7.52 .00 .045 .025 ,045 .000 14.00 1319,03 .001287 520, 520. 520. 2 0 0 .00 166.81 1485.84 0 1 04/20/87 13:53:44 PAGE 34 SECNO DEPTH CWSEL CRIWS WSELK EG HV HL OLOSS BANK ELEV GLOB GCH ROB ALOB ACH AROB VOL TWA LEFT/RIGHT TIME VLOB VCH VROB XHL XNCH XNR WIN ELMIN SSTA SLOPE XLOBL XLCH XLONR ITRIAL IDC ICONT CORAR TOPWID EHDST SPECIAL BRIDGE SB XK XKOR COFG RDLEH BWC BWP BAREA SS ELCHU ELCHD 1.25 1.80 3.00 .00 118,00 4.00 902,00 3.85 15.31 15.31 *SECNO 3964.000 3280 CROSS SECTION 3964.00 EXTENDED 3.46 FEET PRESSURE FLOW EGPRS EGLWC H3 GWEIR CPR BARER TRAPEZOID ELLC ELTRD AREA 25.29 23.75 .11 0. 8530, 902. 902, 21.80 25.50 3495 OVERBANK AREA ASSUMED NON-EFFECTIVE,ELLEA: 25.00 ELREA: 25.00 3964.00 10,76 24.76 .00 ,00 25.29 .53 1,62 ,00 25,00 8530. 0, 8530. 0. 0, 1464. 0. 90. 15. 25,00 .13 .00 5.83 .00 .000 .025 .000 .000 14,00 1318.11 0 CCHV= .300 CEHU= .800 *SECNO 4114.000 3495 OVERBANK AREA ASSUMED NON-EFFECTIVE,ELLEA= 50,00 ELREA= 50.00 4114,00 10,32 24,82 .00 .00 25,55 .73 .10 .16 18.20 8530. 0. 8530, 0, 0, 1242, 0. 95, 16. 22,30 .13 .00 6.87 ,00 045 .025 .045 .000 14.50 1432,10 .000719 150. 150. 150. 2. 0 0 .40 135.20 1567,30 0 CCHV= .100 CEHV= .300 *SECNO 4654,000 3495 OVERBANE AREA ASSUMED NOH-EFFECTIVE,ELLEA= 50.00 ELREA= 50,00 4654,00 9.55 25,15 .00 .00 26,06 .90 .45 .05 21,70 8530, 0, 8530, 0, 0, 1118. 0. 109, 17, 21,80 .15 .00 7,63 .40 .045 .025 .045 .000 15,60 1492,30 .000993 540, 540, 5.40, 1 0 0 .00 132,30 1624,60 0 1 04/20/87 13:53:44 PAGE . 35 SECNO DEPTH CWSEL CRIWS WSELK EG HV HL OLOSS BANK ELEV RLOB ACH RROB ALOB ACH AROB VOL TWA LEFT/RIGHT TIME VLOB VCH VROB XML XNCH XNR WIN ELMIN SSTA SLOPE XLOBL XLCH XLOBR ITRIAL IDC ICONT CORAR TOPWID ENDST •*SECNO 5244,000 3495 OVERBANK AREA ASSUMED NOH-EFFECTIVE,ELLEA= 50,00 ELREA= 50,00 5244.00 9,31 25,71 .00 .40 26.77 1.06 ,66 .05 23,60 8530. 0, 8530, 0, 0, 1034, 0. 124, 19, 22.40 .17 .00 8,25 .00 045 .025 . 4.45 .000 16,40 248.30 *001284 620. 590. 550, 2 0 0 .40 132,60 380.90 0 CCHV= ,300 CEHV= .500 *SECNO 5644,000 3495 OVERBANK AREA ASSUMED NON-EFFECTIVE,ELLEA= 32,40 ELREA= 32,40 LOGAN AVENUE BRIDGE 5644,00 8,86 26.36 .00 .00 27.31 .95 .51 .03 26,10 8530, 0, 8530, 0, 0, 1089, 0, 133, 20. 24,90 .19 .00 7.83 ,00 .445 .025 .045 .000 17,50 34,00 .001285 410. 400. 400, 2 0 0 .00 152.00 186.00 0 SPECIAL BRIDGE SB XR XKOR CON RDLEN BWC BWP BAREA SS ELCHU ELCHD 1.25 2.00 3.00 .00 170.00 3.50 1243,00 .00 19,40 19,40 *SECNO 5762.000 PRESSURE FLOW EGPRS EGLWC H3 RWEIR RPR BAREA TRAPEZOID . ELLC ELTRD AREA 27,82 27.38 +10 0, 8530. 1243, 1249, 26,90 32,40 3495 OVERBANK AREA ASSUMED NOH-EFFECTIVE,ELLEA: 32,40 ELREA= 32,40 5762,00 9,52 27,02 .40 .00 27,82 +80 .51 .40 26.10 8530. 0, 8530, 0, 0, 1190, 0, 137, 21. 24.90 .19 .00 7.17 .40 .000 .025 .000 .000 17,50 34,00 .000957 118, 118, 118, 3 0 0 .00 152.00 186,00 0 1 04/20/87 13:53144 PAGE 36 SECNO DEPTH CWSEL CRIWS WSELE EG HV HL OLOSS BANK ELEV QLOB QCH QROB ALOB ACH AROB VOL TWA LEFT/RIGHT TIME VLOB VCH VROB XHL XNCH XHR WTN ELMIN SSTA SLOPE XLOBL XLCH XLOBR ITRIAL IDC ICOHT CORAR TOPWID ENDST *SECNO 6012,000 6012,00 9,03 27,13 .00 .00 28.32 1.19 .31 .20 28.80 8530, 0, 8530, 0, 0. 974, 0, 143, 21, 29.80 .20 .00 8,75 .00 .045 .025 .045 .000 18,10 27,98 .001641 250, 250, 250. 2 0 0 .00 134.28 162,26 0 *SECNO 6502,000 3495 OVERBAHE AREA ASSUMED NON-EFFECTIVE,ELLEA: 34,80 ELREA= 34,80 WILLIAMS AVENUE BRIDGE 6502,00 8,83 27.93 .00 .00 29,21 1,27 .84 .04 34,80 8530. 0, 8530, 0, 0, 942, 0, 154, 23. 34,00 .22 .00 9.06 .00 .045 425 .045 .000 19,10 39.64 .001789 500, 490, 480, 2 0 0 .00 132,86 172,51 0 SPECIAL BRIDGE SB XE XKOR COFQ RDLEH BWC BWP BAREA SS ELCHU ELCHD .90 1,30 3.00 .00 114.00 11,10 1296,00 1.26 20,00 20,00 *SECNO 6541.000 CLASS A LOW FLOW 3420 BRIDGE W.S.= 27.48 BRIDGE VELOCITY:, 10,15 CALCULATED CHANNEL AREA:, 841, EGPRS EGLWC H3 QWEIR QLOW BAREA TRAPEZOID ELLC ELTRD AREA .40 29,47 .40 0. 8530. 1296, 1298, 31,10 34.80 3495 OVERBANK AREA ASSUMED NON-EFFECTIVE,ELLEA: 34.80 ELREA= 34,80 6541.00 9,23 28.33 .40 .00 29,47 1,14 .26 .00 34,80 8530, 0. 8530, 0. 0, 994, 0, 154, 23, 34.00 .22 .00 8,58 .00 .000 .025 .000 .000 19.10 38,65 '001513 39. 39, 39, 0 0 0 .00 133,86 172,51 0 *SECNO 6681,000 6681,00 9,09 28,49 .00 .00 29.76 1.27 .23 .06 31.30 8530, 0. 8530, 0. 0, 942. 0. 158. 24, 33,90 .22 40 9,05 .00 .045 425 .045 .000 19,40 11,81 .001733 140, 140, 150, 2 0 0 ,00 126,49 138,30 0 SECNO DEPTH CWSEL CRIWS WSELK EG HV HL GLOSS BANE ELEV GLOB QCH QROB ALOB ACH AROB VOL TWA LEFT/RIGHT TIME VLOB VCH VROB XNL XNCH XNR WTN ELMIN SSTA SLOPE XLOBL XLCH XLOBR ITRIAL IDC ICONT CORAR TOPWID ENDST *SECHO 6921.000 .6921.00 9.69 29.19 .00 ,00 30.18 .99 .34 .08 35,90 8530. 0, 8530. 0. 0, 1068, 0. 163. 24. 36.20 .23 .00 7.99 .00 .045 .025 .045 .000 19.50 10,01 .001151 240. 240, 240, 2 0 0 .00 124,00 134.00 0 CCHV= .300 CEHV= .800 *SECNO 6931.000 3265 DIVIDED FLOW 3370 NORMAL BRIDGE,NRD= 14 MIN ELTRD= 35,90 MAX ELLC= 36.20 WELLS AVENUE BRIDGE • 6931.00 9,70 29.20 .00 .00 30.22 1.02 .01 .02 35.90 8530, 0, 8530. 0, 0, 1053. 0, 163. 24, 36,20 ,23 ,00 8,10 .00 .045 .030 ,045 .000 19.50 10,01 .001856 10. 10, 10. 0 0 0 .00 121►00 134.00 0 *SECNO 6973.000 3265 DIVIDED FLOW 3370 NORMAL BRIDGE,NRD= 14 MIN ELTRD= 35,90 MAX ELLC= 36,20 6973,00 9.81 29,31 .00 .00 30►30 .99 .08 ►01 35.90 8530, 0, 8530, 0. 0. 1066. 0, 164. 24. 36.20 .23 .00 8,00 .00 .045 .030 .045 .000 19,50 10.01 .001792 42, 42. 42, 2 0 0 .00 121,00 134.00 0 *SECNO 6983.000 6983.00 9,88 29.38 .00 .00 30,33 .95 .01 .01 35.90 8530. 0, 8530. 0, 0, 1091. 0. 165. 24, 36.20 .23 .00 7,82 .00 .045 ,025 .045 .000 19.50 10.01 .001076 10. 10, 10, 2 0 0 .00 124.00 134.00 0 1 04/20/87 13:53:44 PAGE 38 SECHO DEPTH CWSEL CRIWS WSELK EG HV HL GLOSS BANK ELEV QLOB QCH . QROB ALOB ACH AROB VOL TWA LEFT/RIGHT TIME VLOB VCH VROB XNL XNCH XNR WTN ELMIN SSTA SLOPE XLOBL XLCH XLOBR ITRIAL IDC ICONT CORAR TOPWID ENDST CCHV= ,100 CEHV= .400 *SECNO 7103,000 7103.00 8.81 29.41 .00 .00 30.57 1.16 .16 .09 33,60 8530, 0, 8520, 10, 0. 983. 7. 167, 25. 27.90 .24 .00 8,67 1.44 .045 .025 .045 .000 20,60 25,35 .001611 120. 120, 130. 2 0 0 .00 139.55 164.90 0 *SECNO 7483,000 7483.00 8.54 29.84 .00 .00 31.15 1.31 ,52 .06 35.00 • • • • • • • • • • • • • —_ uJVV i. —.__.__..__vr vJVY'r '-_- v«"_-�_�_Ye "-rLI"Y ---Y• - _"r •1r . 25 .00 9«18 «00 «045 • .020 .045 1000 21«30 27.39V - --- ---- - - .001171 370. 380« 380► 2 0 0 .00 127«61- 155.00 4 • CCHV= «100 CEHV: .500 • 5EGH0 7643«400 - - - 3495 OVERBANK AREA ASSUMED NON-EFFECTIVE,ELLEA: 40,00 ELREA= 40,00 • 7643,00 8,23 29.93 ,00 .00 31.61 1,68 .28 .18 22.20 8530. 0. 8530. 0, 0. 821, 0. 179, 26, 40,10 .25 ,00 10.39 .00 ,045 .028 .045 .000 .21.70 50►00 ' '002813 160. 160, 170, 2 0 , 0 ,00 113►05 163,05 0 CCHV: .300 CEHV .800 *SECHO 7653,000 3265 DIVIDED FLOW 3370 NORMAL BRIDGE,NRD: 17 MIN ELTRD: 40.00 MAX ELLC: 40,10 BRONSON WAY BRIDGE 7653,00 8,25 29,95 .00 .00 31,72 1.78 .04 .08 40.00 8530, 0, 8530, 0. 0, 798, 0, 179, 26, 40,10 ,25 .00 10.70 . .00 .045 .035 ,045 4000 21.70 50,01 .005102 10. 10, 10, 0 0 0 .00 105.57 163,08 0 *SECNO 7725,000 1 04/20/87 13:53:44 PAGE 39 SECHO DEPTH CWSEL CRIWS WSELK EG HV HL BLOBS BANK ELEV QLOB QCH QROB ALOB ACH AROB VOL TWA LEFT/RIGHT TIME VLOB VCH VROB XHL XNCH XHR WTN ELMIN SSTA SLOPE XLOBL XLCH XLOBR ITRIAL IDC ICONT CORAR TOPWID EMOST 3265 DIVIDED FLOW 3370 NORMAL BRIDGE,NRD: 17 MIN ELTRD: 40►00 MAX ELLC: 40.10 7725,00 8►76 30.46 .00 .00 32,02 1,56 .23 .07 40.00 8530. 0. 8530. ' 0, 0. 852. 0, 181, 27. 40,10 • .25 .00 10,01 I .00 .045 ,025 .045 .000 21,70 50.01 .402147 72. 72. 72. 2 4. 0 ,00 106,38 163,89 0 *SECNO 7735,000 3495 OVERBANK AREA ASSUMED NON-EFFECTIVE,ELLEA: 40,00 ELREA: 40,00 7735.00 9,05 30.75 , .00 .00 32.10 1.35 .02 .06 40,00 8530, 0. 8530, 0, 0, 914, 0, 181. 27. 40,10 .25 .00 9.33 .00 .045 .025 .045 ,000 21.70 50,01 .001751 10, 10, 10. 2 0 0 400 114,34 164,34 0 *SECNO 7845.000 3495 OVERBANK AREA ASSUMED NON-EFFECTIVE,ELLEA: 50,00 ELREA: 50,00 LIBRARY 7845,00 9,86 31.26- ; .00 .00 32,35 1,09 ,17 .08 40.00 • 8530. 0. 8530. 1 0. 0, 1017, 0. 183. 27. 39.00 *001430 110, 110, 100, 0 U .00 1,IU 14Y.tI 0 SPECIAL BRIDGE SB XE XKOR CDFQ RDLEN BWC BWP BAREA S5 ELCHU ELCHD 1.05 1,70 3,00 .00 101,00 6.00 1999.00 1,88 22.60 22,60 *SECNO 8002,000 CLASS A LOW FLOW 3420 BRIDGE W,S,= 31,07 BRIDGE VELOCITY=, 9.08 CALCULATED CHANNEL AREA:, 939, 1 04/20/87 13:53:44 PAGE 40 SECNO DEPTH CWSEL CRIWS WSELK EG HV HL OLOSS BANK ELEV QLOB QCH QROB ALOB ACH AROB VOL TWA LEFT/RIGHT TIME VLOB VCH VROB XNL )(NCH XHR WTN ELMIN SSTA SLOPE XLOBL XLCH XLOBR ITRIAL IDC ICONT CORAR TOPWID ENDST EGPRS EGLWC H3 QWEIR QLOW BAREA TRAPEZOID ELLC ELTRD AREA ,00 32,50 ,20 0, 8530, 1999, 2000. 38,60 50,00 3495 OVERBANK AREA ASSUMED NON-EFFECTIVE,ELLEA= . 50,00 ELREA= 50,00 8002,00 10.06 31.46 ,00 40 32,50 1,04 ,15 ,00 40.00 8530, 0, 8530, 0, 0, 1043, 0. 187, 27, 39,00 .26 ,00 8,17 - ,00 ,000 .025 .000 .000 21,40 14,08 *001321 157, 157, 157, 0 0 0 .00 136,24 150.33 0 *SECNO 8092.000 8092.00 9,36 31.56 .00 .00 32,88 1.32 .16 .22 31,90 8530, 0, 8530, 0, 0, 927, 0, 189, 28, 42,00 .27 ,00 • 9.21 .00 .045 ,030 .045 .000 22,20 125.43 .002524 90, 90. 80, 1 0 0 .00 123.06 248.49 . 0 *SECNO 8402.000 3495 OVERBANK AREA ASSUMED HOB-EFFECTIVE,ELLEA= 41.00 ELREA= 41.00 • HOUSER WAY BRIDGE 8402,00 10,70 32.30 .00 .00 33.49 1.19 .57 .04 32.10 8530. 0. 8530. 0, 0. 976. 0. 196, 29. 39,10 .27 .00 8,74 ,00 .045 .025 ,045 .000 21,60 27.70 *001389 290, 310, 310, 2 0 0 .00 120.70 148.40 0 SPECIAL BRIDGE SB XK XKOR COFQ RDLEN BWC BWP BAREA SS ELCHU ELCHD 1,25 1,30 3,00 .00 83,00 4,00 1270,00 2,05 22,80 22,80 *SECNO 8436,000 CLASS A LOW FLOW 3420 BRIDGE W,S,= 32.15 BRIDGE VELOCITY=, 9,29 CALCULATED CHANNEL AREA:, 918, 1 04/20/87 13:53:44 PAGE 41 SECNO DEPTH CWSEL CRIWS WSELK EG HV HL OLOSS BANK ELEV Q QLOB QCH QROB ALOB ACH AROB VOL TWA LEFT/RIGHT TIME VLOB VCH VROB XNL XNCH XNR WTN ELMIN SSTA SLOPE XLOBL XLCH XLOBR ITRIAL IDC ICONT CORAR TOPWID ENDST EGPRS EGLWC H3 QWEIR QLOW BAREA TRAPEZOID ELLC ELTRD AREA .00 33.64 .22 0. 8530, 1270, 1269, 35.00 41.00 3495 OVERBANK AREA ASSUMED NON-EFFECTIVE,ELLEA= 41.00 ELREA: 41.00 8436,00 10,92 32,52 .00 .00 33.64 1,12 .16 .00 32.10 8530, 0, 8530, 0, 0, 1003, 0. 197, 29, 39.10 .28 .00 8,51 .00 000 .025 .000 .000 21.60 27.70 .001276 34. 34. 34. 0 0 0 .00 120,99 148,69 0 CCHV: .300 CEHV= .870 *SECHO 8476,000 RAILROAD BRIDGE • 8476.00 13,03 32.53 .00 .00 34.00 1.46 .06 .29 45.50 8530. 0, 8530, 0. 0. 879. 0. 197. 29. 43.30 .28 .00 9,70 .00 .045 .025 .045 .000 19,50 27,06 .001639 40. 40. 40, 2 0 0 .00 102.03 129,09 0 CCHV: .100 CEHV: .300 *SECNO 8596,000 3265 DIVIDED FLOW 3301 HV CHANGED MORE THAN HVINS • a I-405 8596,00 11,79 33,59 .00 ,00 34.29 .69 .21 .08 34.60 8530. 0. 8527, 3, 0, 1277. 2. 200, 29, 32.50 .28 .00 6.68 1.08 .050 .035 .040 .000 21.80 70.35 .001962 160. 120, 100. 3 0 0 .00 152,37 234,73 0 *SECNO 8836.000 8836.00 11,22 34.02 .00 .00 34,76 .74 .46 .01 48,80 8530, 0. 8530, 0. 0, 1234. 0. 207, 30. 34.80 .29 .00 6.91 .00 .050 .035 .040 .000 22.80 30.35 .001855 230, 240, 230. 0 0 0 .00 158.77 189,12 0 1 04/20/87 13:53:44 PAGE 42 SECHO . DEPTH CWSEL CRIWS WSELR EG NV HL OLOSS BANK ELEV QLOB QCH QROB ALOB ACH AROB VOL TWA LEFT/RIGHT TIME VLOB VCH VROB XNL XNCH XNR WTN ELMIN SSTA SLOPE XLOBL XLCH XLOBR ITRIAL IDC ICONT CORAR TOPWID ENDST *SECNO 9446.000 9446.00 10.70 35,30 .00 .00 36,38 1.09 1,52 .10 49.80 8530. 0, 8520. 10. 0, 1017. 10. 223. 32, 34.30 ,31 .00 8.38 1.05 .050 .044 .050 .000 24,60 23.57 .003525 570. 610. 650. 2 0 0 .00 135.32 158.89 0 *SECNO 10236,000 8530. U, 85dU. V. U. 1[UD. U. tUt ,i'I. wU.cv .34 .00 7,08 .00 .450 .044 .050 .000 27,40 38,37 .002556 800. 790. 740, 2 0 0 .00 136,36 174.73 0 *SECNO 11156,000 11156,00 12.59 40,29 .00 .00 41.34 1,05 2,49 .08 41,30 8530. 0, 8457. 73. 0, 1024, 45, 267, 37, 38,90 .37 .00 8.26 1.62 .050 .044 .050 .000 27,70 10,84 +002867 820, 920, 970, 2 0 0 .00 143.48 154,32 0 1 04/20/87 13:53:44 PAGE 43 .. *tt** . .. ..**. THIS RUN EXECUTED 04/20/87 14:01:03 .. . HEC2 RELEASE DATED NOV 76 UPDATED MAY 1984 ERROR CORR - 01,02,03,04,05,06 MODIFICATION - 50,51,52,53,54,55,56 IBM-PC-XT VERSION ************************************* ********** T1 RENTON FIS - SEPT 1986 '- 519989.D0 T2 MULTIPLE PROFILE RUN T3 CEDAR RIVER-500 YR FLOW J1 ICHECK INq NINV IDIR STRT METRIC HVINS Q WSEL PC -10, 5. 0, 0, .003000 .00 .0 10900. 14.000 .000 J2 PROF IPLOT PRFVS XSECV XSECH FN ALLDC IBW CHHIM ITRACE 15,000 .000 -1,000 ,000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 ,000 04/20/87 13:53:44 PAGE 44 SECHO DEPTH CWSEL CRIWS WSELK EG NV HL GLOSS BANK ELEV QLOB RCH (,ROB ALOB ACH AROB VOL TWA LEFT/RIGHT TIME VLOB VCH VROB XNL XNCH XHR WTN ELMIN SSTA SLOPE XLOBL XLCH XLOBR ITRIAL IOC ICONT CORAR TOPWID ENDST *PROF 4 CCHV= .300 CEHV= 1,000 *SECNO .100 3495 OVERBANK AREA ASSUMED NON-EFFECTI'VE,ELLEA: 22.70 ELREA= 22.70 LAKE WASHINGTON .10 12.41 15.21 ,00 14,00 17,03 1.82 .00 .00 17,40 10900. 0, 10900, 0. 0, 1006. 0. 0, 0. 18,20 .00 .00 10,84 .00 ,035 .025 .035 .400 2,80 33.47 .003003 0, 0, 0, 0 0 4 ,00 156.98 190,45 0 CCHV: .300 CEHV: .500 SPECIAL BRIDGE 5227 DOWNSTREAM ELEV IS 13,30 ,NOT 15.21 HYDRAULIC JUMP OCCURS DOWNSTREAM (IF LOW FLOW CONTROLS) .002023 920. 920, 950. 2 0 0 .00 141,40 1401,90 0 *SECNO 3382,000 3495 OVERBANK AREA ASSUMED NON-EFFECTIVE,ELLEA= 50.00 ELREA= 50,00 3382,00 10,33 22,53 .00 .00 24,12 1,59 1.62 .00 18.40 10900, 0. 10900, 0, 0, 1076. 0, 91, 18. 18.50 .10 .00 10,13 .00 .045 .025 .045 .000 12,20 1232,00 ,001796 850. 850. 840, 2 0 0 .00 130,94 1362.90 0 1 • 04/20/87 13:53:44 PAGE 46 SECNO DEPTH CWSEL CRIWS WSELK EG HV HL GLOSS BANK ELEV QLOB qCH QROB ALOB ACH AROB VOL TWA LEFT/RIGHT TIME VLOB VCH VROB XNL XNCH XNR WTN ELMIN SSTA SLOPE XLOBL XLCH XLOBR ITRIAL IDC ICONT CORAR TOPWID ENDST CCHV= .300 CEHV= .500 *SECNO 3902,000 3280 CROSS SECTION 3902,00 EXTENDED 2,74 FEET 3301 HV CHANGED MORE THAN HVINS 3495 OVERBANK AREA ASSUMED NOH-EFFECTIVE,ELLEA= 25.50 ELREA= 25,50 SOUTH BOEING BRIDGE 3902,00 10,04 24,04 .00 .00 25,06 1,02 .76 .17 25,00 10900. 0, 10900, 0, 0, 1343, 0, 105. 20, 25,00 .11 ,00 8,12 .00 .045 4025 .045 .000 14,00 1318,44 .001221 520, 520, 520. 2 0 0 .00 168.05 1486,50 0 SPECIAL BRIDGE SB XK XKOR COFQ RDLEN BWC BWP BAREA SS ELCHU ELCHD 1.25 1,80 3.00 .00 118,00 4,00 902,00 3.85 15.31 15.31 *SECNO 3964.000 3280 CROSS SECTION 3964.00 EXTENDED 4.02 FEET PRESSURE AND WEIR FLOW EGPRS EGLWC H3 QWEIR QPR BAREA TRAPEZOID ELLC ELTRD AREA 28.12 25.15 .12 3479, 7436. 902. 902. 21.80 25,50 3964,00 11,31 25.31 .00 .00 25,94 .62 .88 .00 25,00 10900, 686. 10198. 16. 472, 1558, 24. 108. 20. 25,00 ,12 1,45 6.54 .67 .045 .025 .045 ,000 14,00 1100.00 .000662 62. 62, 62. 2 0 3 .00 421.00 1521,00 0 CCHV= .300 CEHV= .800 *SECNO 4114.000 3495 OVERBANK AREA ASSUMED NON-EFFECTIVE,ELLEA= 50.00 ELREA= 50,00 1 SB XK XROR CON RDLEN BWC BWP BAREA SS £LCHU £LCHD 1.25 1,50 3.00 400 160,00 8,00 1495,00 .00 8.90 8,90 *SECHO 62.000 CLASS B LOW FLOW 3420 BRIDGE W.S,= 14.33 BRIDGE VELOCITY=, 13.21 CALCULATED CHANNEL AREA=, 825, EGPRS EGLWC H3 QWEIR QLOW BAREA TRAPEZOID ELLC ELTRD AREA .00 17,25 .00 0. 10900. 1495. 1490, 18.70 22,70 3495 OVERBANE AREA ASSUMED NOH-EFFECTIVE,ELLEA: 22.70 ELREA: 22.70 U/S END OF NORTH BOEING BRIDGE 62,00 12.85 15.65 .00 .00 17,25 1,59 .22 '00 17,40 10900, 0. 10900, 0, 0. 1076, 0. 1. 0. 18.20 .00 .00 10,13 .00 .000 .025 .000 _.000 2,80 32,84 .002421 62. 62, 62, 0 0 0 ,00 157,67 190.52 0 *SECNO 892,000 1 04/20/87 13:53:44 PAGE 45 SECHO DEPTH CWSEL CRIWS WSELK EG HV HL OLOSS BANK ELEV QLOB QCH QROB ALOB ACH AROB VOL TWA LEFT/RIGHT TIME VLOB VCH VROB XNL XNCH XHR WIN ELMIN SSTA SLOPE XLOBL XLCH XLOBR ITRIAL IDC ICONT CORAR TOPWID ENDSI 3265 DIVIDED FLOW 892.00 7.42 17.72 ,00 .00 19,56 1.84 2.19 .12 18.60 10900, 0, 10900, 0, 0. 1001. 0. 21. 3, 17,40 .02 .00 10.89 .55 435 .025 .035- .000 10.30 109.57 .002873 840, 830, 830, 2 0 0 .00 154.49 432.04 0 CCHV .100 CEHV: .300 *SECNO 1612.000 3265 DIVIDED FLOW 3280 CROSS SECTION 1612,00 EXTENDED .81 FEET 3301 HV CHANGED MORE THAN HVINS 1612,00 8.91 19,91 .00 .00 20.92 1,00 1.28 .08 18,40 10900, 44. 10540. 316, 62. 1290. 182. 42., 9. 16.40 .05 .71 8.17 1.74 ,045 .025 .045 .000 11,00 43.86 .001199 720. 720, 740. 2 0 0 .00 501,86 596.60 0 *SECNO 2532.000 3301 HV CHANGED MORE THAN HVINS 3495 OVERBANK AREA ASSUMED NON-EFFECTIVE,ELLEA= 50,00 ELREA= 50.00 2532,00 8,50 20.90 .00 .00 22.51 1.60 1.41 .18 19.10 ' 10900. 0. 10900. 0. 0. 1073, 0, 70, 15. 19.30 SECNO DEPTH CWSEL CRIWS WSELK EG HV HL OLOSS BANK ELEV GLOB QCH QROB ALOB ACH AROB VOL TWA LEFT/RIGHT TIME VLOB VCH VROB XHL XNCH XNR WIN ELMIN SSTA SLOPE XLOBL XLCH XLOBR ITRIAL IDC ICONT CORAR TOPWIB ENDST 4114.00 10.84 25.34 .00 .00 26.41 1.07 .12 .36 18.20 10900. 0. 10900. 0. 0. 1313. 0. 113. 21. 22.30 .12 .00 8.30 .00 .045 .025 .045 .000 14.50 1432.10 .000977 150. 150. 150. 2 0 0 .00 135.20 1567.30 0 CCHV: .100 CEHV: .300 *SECNO 4654.000 3495 OVERBANK AREA ASSUMED HON-EFFECTIVE,ELLEA: 50.00 ELREA= 50,00 4654.00 10.20 25.80 .00 ,00 27.07 1,28 .60 .06 21.70 10900. 0. 10900. 0. 0. 1201. 0. 129. 23. 21.80 .14 .00 9.08 .00 .045 .025 .045 .000 15,60 1492.30 .001276 540. 540. 540. 1 0 0 .00 132.30 1624.60 0 *SECNO 5244.000 3495 OVERBANK AREA ASSUMED NON-EFFECTIVE,ELLEA= 50.00 ELREA= 50.00 5244.00 10.12 26.52 .00 .00 27.93 1.42 .82 .04 23.60 10900. 0. 10900. 0. 0. 1141. 0. 145. 25. 22.40 .16 .00 9.55 .00 .045 .025 .045 .000 16.40 248.30 .001510 620. 590. 550. 2 0 0 .00 132.60 380.90 0 CCHV= .300 CEHV: .500 *SECNO 5644.000 3280 CROSS SECTION 5644.00 EXTENDED .08 FEET 3495 OVERBANK AREA ASSUME➢ NON-EFFECTIVE,ELLEA= 32.40 ELREA= 32.40 LOGAN AVENUE BRIDGE 5644.00 9.88 27.38 .00 .00 28.57 1.19 .57 .07 26,10 10900. 0, 10900. 0. 0. 1245. 0. 156. 26. 24.90 .17 .00 8.75 .00 .045 .025 .045 .000 17.50 34.00 .001345 410, 400. 400. 2 0 0 .00 152.00 186.00 0 1 04/20/87 13:53:44 PAGE 48 SECNO DEPTH CWSEL CRIWS WSELK EC HV HL GLOSS BANK ELEV QLOB QCH QROB ALOB ACH AROB VOL TWA LEFT/RIGHT TIME VLOB VCH VROB XHL XNCH XNR WIN ELMIN SSTA SLOPE XLOBL XLCH XLOBR ITRIAL IDC ICONT CORAR TOPWID ENDST SPECIAL BRIDGE SB XX XKOR COFQ RDLEN BWC BWP BAREA SS ELCHU ELCHD 1,25 2,00 3.00 .00 170.00 3.50 1243.00 .00 19.40 19,40 *SECNO 5762,000 3280 CROSS SECTION 5762.00 EXTENDED 1,64 FEET PRESSURE FLOW EGPRS EGLWC H3 QWEIR QPR BAREA TRAPEZOID ELLC ELTRD AREA 29.77 28,67 .13 0. 10900, 1243, 1249, 26,90 32.40 3495 OVERBANK AREA ASSUMED NON-EFFECTIVE,ELLEA= 32.40 ELREA= 32,40 5762.00 11,43 28,93 .00 .00 29,77 .84 1,20 .00 26.10 10900, 0, 10900. 0, 0, 1481, 0, 160, 26, 24.90 .17 ,00 7.36 .00 .000 .025 .000 .000 17,50 34,00 .000754 118, 118, 118, 2 0 0 .00 152.00 186,00 0 *SECNO 6012.000 6012,00 10,88 28,98 ,00 ,00 30,21 1.23 .24 ,19 28.80 10900, 0. 10900, 0, 1, 1227. 0. 167. 27, 29.80 ,18 .24 8,88 .00 .045 .025 .045 .000 18.10 10,37 .001318 250. 250. 250. 2 0 0 .00 155,17 165,54 0 *SECNO 6502,000 3495 OVERBANK AREA ASSUMED HOH-EFFECTIVE,ELLEA= 34.80 ELREA= 34,80 WILLIAMS AVENUE BRIDGE 6502,00 10.51 29.61 .00 .00 30.96 1,35 .69 .06 34,80 10900, 0, 10900. 0, 0, 1169, 0, 181, 29, 34,00 .20 .00 9.33 .00 .045 .025 .045 .000 19,10 35,43 .001520 500. 490, 480, 2 0 0 .00 138,74 174.17 0 1 04/20/87 13:53:44 PAGE 49 SECHO DEPTH CWSEL CRIWS WSELK EG HV HL GLOSS BANK ELEV QLOB QCH QROB ALOB ACH AROB VOL TWA LEFT/RIGHT TIME VLOB VCH VROB XHL XNCH XNR WTN ELMIN SSTA SLOPE XLOBL XLCH XLOBR ITRIAL IDC ICONT CORAR TOPWID ENDST SPECIAL BRIDGE • SB XK XKOR COFQ RDLEN BWC BWP BAREA SS ELCHU ELCHD .90 1,30 3.00 .00 11440 11.10 1296.00 1.26 20.00 20,00 *SECNO 6541'000 CLASS A LOW FLOW 3420 BRIDGE W,S,= 29,18 BRIDGE VELOCITY=, 10.38 CALCULATED CHANNEL AREA:, 1050, EGPRS EGLWC H3 QWEIR GLOW BAREA TRAPEZOID ELLC ELTRD AREA 31.04 31,22 ,37 0. 10900. 1296. 1298. 31,10 34.80 3495 OVERBANK AREA ASSUMED NON-EFFECTIVE,ELLEA= 34.80 ELREA= 34,80 6541,00 10,88 29,98 .00 .00 31,22 1.24 .26 .00 34,80 10900, 0. 10900. ` 0, 0. 1220. 0. 182, 29, 34,00 .20 ,00 8,93 .00 .000 .025 .000 .000 19,10 35.18 .001332 39. 39, 39, 0 0 0 +00 139.59 174,77 0 *SECNO 6681,000 10900, 0, 10900, 0, 0, 114/, 0, 186, ;i0, ;ii.Yv .20 ,00 9,51 ,00 ,045 ,025 ,045 ,000 19,40 10,49 .001526 140, 140, 150, 2 0 0 ,00 127,82 138,31 0 *SECNO 6921.000 6921,00 11,21 30.71 ,00 40 31.88 1,17 ,31 .07 35,90 10900, 0, 10900, 0, 0. 1256. 0. 192. 30, 36,20 ,21 00 8.68 ,00 ,045 .025 .045 ,000 19,50 10,00 *001125 240, 240, 240, 2 0 0 ,00 124,00 134,00 0 CCHV= .300 CENV= ,800 *SECNO 6931,000 3370 NORMAL BRIDGE,NRD= 14 MIN ELTRD= 35.90 MAX ELLC= 36,20 WELLS AVENUE BRIDGE 1 04/20/87 13:53:44 PAGE 50 SECNO DEPTH CWSEL CRIWS WSELR EG HV HL OLOSS BANE ELEV QLOB (CH CIROB ALOB ACH AROB VOL TWA LEFT/RIGHT TIME VLOB VCH VROB XNL XNCH XNR WTH ELMIN SSTA SLOPE XLOBL XLCH XLOBR ITRIAL IDC ICONT CORAR TOPWID ENDST 6931,00 11,22 30,72 ,00 .00 31.95 1,23 .02 ,05 35,90 10900, 0. 10900, 0, 0, 1224, 0, 193, 30, 36,20 .21 .00 8.91 .00 ,045 .030 .045 .000 19.50 10.00 '003999 10, 10, 10, 0 0 0 ' -14,00 124.00 134,00 0 *SECNO 6973,000 3370 NORMAL BRIDGE,NRD= 14 MIN ELTRD= 35,90 MAX ELLC= 36,20 6973,00 11,39 30.89 ,00 .00 32,12 1,23 .17 .00 35.90 10900, 0; 10900. 0. 0. 1226, 0. 194. 30. 36,20 .21 .00 8.89 ,00 .045 430 .045 .000 19.50 10,00 .003981 42, 42, 42, 2 0 0 -32.38 124,00 134.00 0 *SECNO 6983,000 6983,00 11,60 31,10 .00 .00 32,18 1.09 .02 .04 35,90 10900, 0, 10900. 0, 0, 1304. 0. 194, 30. 36.20 .21 .00 8,36 .00 045 .025 .045 .000 19,50 10,00 .001003 10, 10. 10, 2 0 0 .00 124,00 134.00 0 CCHV= .100 CENV= .400 *SECNO 7103,000 7103.00 10.55 31,15 .00 .00 32,37 1,23 .14 .06 33.60 10900, 0, 10876. 24. 0. 1223. , 14. 198. 31. 27,90 .21 .00 8,89 1,77 .045 .025 .045 .000 20.60 21,59 .001318 120. 120, 130, 2 0 0 .00 143.32 164,91 0 *SECNO 7483,000 7483,00 10,17 31.47 .00 .00 32,89 1,42 .44 .08 35.00 10900, 0. 10900. 0. 0, 1138, 0. 208. 32. 37,20 .23 .00 9,57 .00 .045 .020 .045 .000 21,30 25,85 .001010 370. 380, 380, 2 0 0 .00 129.16 155,01 0 CCHV= .100 CENV= 600 *SECNO 7643,000 3495 OVERBANK AREA ASSUMED NON-EFFECTIVE,ELLEA= 40.00 ELREA= 40,00 1 SECHO DEPTH CWSEL CRIWS WSELE EG HV HL ' GLOSS BANE ELEV QLOB ACH (ROB ALOB ACH AROB VOL TWA LEFT/RIGHT TIME VLOB VCH VROB XNL XNCH XHR WTH ELMIN SETA SLOPE XLOBL XLCH XLOBR ITRIAL IDC ICONT CORAR TOPWID' EHDST 7643.00 9,80 31,50 .00 .00 33,34 1.84 .24 • .21 22,20 10900. 0. 10900, 0. 0, 1000, 0, 212, 32. 40,10 .23 .00 10.90 .00 .045 .028 .045 .000 21,70 50,00 .002463 160. 160, 170, 2 0 0 .00 115,50 165.50 0 CCHV= .300 CEHV= .800 *SECHO 7653,000 3265 DIVIDED FLOW 3370 NORMAL BRIDGE,HRD= 17 MIN ELTRD= 40.00 MAX ELLC= 40.10 BRONSON WAY BRIDGE 7653,00 9,80 31.50 .00 .00 33,49 1,99 .03 ,11 40,00 10900, 0. 10900, 0. 0, 964, 0, 212, 32, 40,10 .23 ,00 11.31 ,00 .045 .035 .045 ,000 21,70 50,00 .004809 10. 10, 10, 1 0 0 .00. 108.03 165.53 0 *SECNO 7725,000 3265 DIVIDED FLOW 3370 NORMAL BRIDGE,NRD= 17 MIN ELTRD= 40.00 MAX ELLC= 40.10 7725,00 10,27 31,97 .00 .00 33,77 1,79 ,22 .06 40.00 10900, 0, 10900. 0, 0, 1014, 0, 214, 33, 40.10 .23 .00 10,74 .00 ,045 ,025 .045 .000 21,70 50.00 .002117 72. 72. 72, 2 - 0 0 .00 108,77 166.27 0 *SECNO 7735,000 3495 OVERBANK AREA ASSUMED NON-EFFECTIVE,ELLEA= 40.00 ELREA= 40,00 7735,00 10,63 32,33 .00 .00 33.86 1.53 .02 .08 40.00 10900, . 0. 10900, 0, 0, 1098, 0, 214. 33, 40,10 . .23 .00 9,93 .00 .045 425 .045 .000 21.70 50.00 .001631 10. 10, 10, 2 0 0 ,00 116,83 166,83 0 1 04/20/87 13153:44 PAGE 52 SECHO DEPTH CWSEL CRIWE WSELR EG HV HL OLOSS BANK ELEV QLOB ACH AROB ALOB ACH AROB VOL TWA LEFT/RIGHT TIME VLOB UCH VROB XNL XNCH XHR WIN ELMIN SETA SLOPE XLOBL XLCH XLOBR ITRIAL IDC ICONT CORAR TGPWID ENDS! ,001243 110, 110, 100, 2 0 0 .UU 14Ue;iU 111.0V 0 SPECIAL BRIDGE SB XX XKOR COFQ RDLEH BWC BWP BAREA SS ELCHU ELCHD 1,05 1,70 3,00 .00 101,00 6,00 1999.00 1,88 22,60 22.60 *SECNO 8002.000 CLASS A LOW FLOW 3420 BRIDGE W.S,= 32,75 BRIDGE VELOCITY=, 9,42 CALCULATED CHANNEL AREA:, 1158, EGPRS EGLWC H3 QWEIR QLOW BAREA TRAPEZOID ELLC ELTRD AREA ,00 34,27 .20 0, 10900, 1999, 2000, 38,60 50,00 3495 OVERBANK AREA ASSUMED NON-EFFECTIVE,ELLEA: 50.00 ELREA: 50,00 8002,00 11.74 33,14 .00 ,00 34.27 1,13 .15 .00 40.00 10900, 0. 10900. 0. ' 0, 1276, 0, 221, 34. 39,00 .24 .00 8,54 .00 .000 .025 .000 .000 21,40 13,43 .001165 157. 157, 157, 0 0 0 .00 140.82 154,24 0 *SECNO 8092,000 8092.00 11.03 33,23 .00 .00 34.59 1,36 .14 .18 31.90 10900, 180, 10720, 0, 115, 1135, 0. 224. 34. 42.00 ,24 1,57 9,44 .00 ,045 4030 .045 .000 22.20 13,81 .002125 90, 90, 80, 1 0. 0 .00 238,75 252,56 0 *SECNO 8402,000 1 04/20/87 13:53:44 PAGE 53 SECNO DEPTH CWSEL CRIWS WSELK EG HV HL OLOSS BANK ELEV QLOB RCN QROB ALOB ACH AROB VOL TWA LEFT/RIGHT TIME VLOB VCH VROB XHL XNCH XNR WIN ELMIN SSTA SLOPE XLOBL XLCH XLOBR ITRIAL IDC ICONT CORAR TOPWID ENDST 3495 OVERBANK AREA ASSUMED NON-EFFECTIVE,ELLEA: 41.00 ELREA: 41,00 HOUSER WAY BRIDGE 8402.00 ' 12,14 33.74 .00 .00 35,14 1,39 .52 .02 32.10 10900. 0. 10900. 0, 0, 1151, 0, 233. 35. 39,10 ,25 .00 9.47 .00 ,045 .025 .045 .000 21.60 27,70 .001345 290, 310, 310, 1 0 0 .00 122.64 150,34 0 SPECIAL BRIDGE SB XX XKOR CON RDLEH BWC BWP BAREA SS ELCHU ELCHD 1,25 1.30 3.00 .00 83,00 4,00 . 1270,00 2,05 22,80 22,80 *SECNO 8436,000 CLASS A LOW FLOW 3420 BRIDGE W.S,= 33,57 BRIDGE VELOCITY:, 10,01 CALCULATED CHANNEL AREA:, 1089, EGPRS EGLWC H3 QWEIR QLOW BAREA TRAPEZOID ELLC ELTRD AREA • • • • • • *SEM 7845,000 - - 3495 OVERBANK AREA ASSUMED NON-EFFECTIVE,ELLEA: 50,00 ELREA= 50,00 • LIBRARY 7845,00 11.54 32,94 ,00 ,00 34,1E 1,18 .16 ,10 40,00 10900, 0, 10900, 0, 0, 1249, 0, 217, 33. 39,00 .94 ,__._-Ail . .A_77. .nn. _114=5 _A95 � �.J 45 AAA _.__?�.off i 3.-50 ----------- 3495 OVERBANK AREA ASSUMED NON-EFFECTIVE,ELLEA= 41,00 ELREA= 41,00 8436,00 12.40 34,00 .00 .00 35.32 1.32 .18 .00 32.10 10900. 0. 10900, 0, 0, 1183, 0. 234. 35. 39.10 .25 .00 9,21 .00 .000 .025 .000 .000 21,60 27.70 *001233 34+ 34. 34. 0 0 0 .00 122.99 150,69 0 CCHV= .300 CEHV= .870 *SECNO 8476.000 RAILROAD BRIDGE 8476,00 14.50 34.00 .00 .00 35,73 1.73 .06 .36 45,50 10900, 0, 10900. 0. 0, 1033, 0. 235. 35. 43.30 .25 40 10,56 .00 .045 ,025 .045 .000 19.50 24,66 401689 40, 40. 40, 2 0 0 600 107.61 132.27 0 1 04/20/87 13:53:44 PAGE 54 SECNO DEPTH CWSEL CRIWS WSELK EG HV HL GLOSS BANK ELEV RLOB RCH RROB ALOB ACH AROB VOL TWA LEFT/RIGHT TIME VLOB UCH VROB XNL XNCH XNR WIN ELMIN SSTA SLOPE XLOBL XLCH XLOBR ITRIAL IDC ICDNT CORAR TOPWID ENDST CCHV: .100 CEHV: .300 *SECNO 8596,000 3265 DIVIDED FLOW 3301 HV CHANGED MORE THAN HVINS 1-405 8596.00 13.45 35.25 .00 .00 36.04 ,78 .21 .09 34.60 10900. 15, 10852, 33. 14. 1524, 16. 238. 36. 32.50 .26 1.08 7.12 2.03 .050 .035 .040 .000 21.80 50.94 #001865 160. 120. 100, 3 0 0 .00 182,15 245.09 0 *SECNO 8836,000 8836,00 12.85 35,65 .00 .40 36.46 .81 .42 .01 48.80 10900, 0. 10867. 33, 0, 1498, 31. 247, 37. 34.80 1.27 .00 7,26 1.07 .050 .035 .040 .000 22.80 28.03 .001626 230. 240, 230, 1 0 0 .00 226,54 254.57 0 *SECNO 9446.000 9446.00 ' 12.13 36.73 .00 +00 38.01 1.29 1+41 ,14 49,80 10900. 0. 10786, 114. . 0. 1179, 45, 266. 40. 34.30 .29 .00 9,14 2.56 .050 444 .050 .000 24.60 22,08 .003527 570. 610. 650. 1 0 0 .00 143.33 165.41 0 *SECNO 10236.000 10236,00 12.09 39.49 +00 .00 40.42 ,93 2,37 .04 55,00 10900. 0. 10900. 0, 0, 1412, 0, 290, 42, 40,20 .31 ,00 7.72 .00 .050 ,044 .050 .000 27.40 36.77 .002574 800. 790, 740, 2 0 0 .00 140.31 177.08 0 *SECNO 11156,000 11156.00 14.09 41.79 .00 .00 43.01 1,21 2,50 .09 41.30 10900, 0, 10523. 377. 0, 1172, 150. 319. 46, 38,90 .34 .47 8.98 2,52 .050 .044 ,050 .400 27.70 9.59 .402878 820, 920, 970+ 2 0 0 .00 201.23 210,82 1 04/20/87 13153:44 400P PAGE 55 THIS RUN EXECUTED 04/20/87 14:03:03 **********X X X X************** ***-IE****X K K MI K XWA* HEC2 RELEASE DATED NOV 76 UPDATED MAY 1984 ERROR CORR - 01,02,03,04,05,06 MODIFICATION - 50,51,52,53,54,55,56 IBM-PC-XT VERSION ************ E***ESE*************** E******ESE** NOTE- ASTERISK (*) AT LEFT OF CROSS-SECTION NUMBER INDICATES MESSAGE IN SUMMARY OF ERRORS LIST CEDAR RIVER-10 YR FLOW SUMMARY PRINTOUT SECNO XLCH TOPWID EG ELMIN CRIWS CWSEL• SSTA STCHL STCHR ENDST 10K*S. .100 .00 151,95 14.01 2.80 . .00 12.93 38.08 30.40 190.90 190,03 29.88 .100 .00 154.23 15,28 2.80 .00 13.88 36,01 30.40 190,90 190,23 30.27 .100 .00 155.14 15,80 2,80 .00 14,26 35,17 30,40 190.90 190,31 30,47 .100 .00 156.98 17.03 2,80 .00 15,21 33.47 30.40 190.90 190.45 30.03 * 62.000 62.00 152.51 14.14 2.80 .00 13.16 37,57 30,40 190.90 190.08 25,21 * 62.000 62,00 155.00 15,44 2.80 ,00 14,20 35,30 30,40 190,90 190.30 24,93 * 62.000 62.00 155,94 15,98 2,80 .00 14.64 34,43 30,40 190.90 . 190,37 24,75 * 62,000 62,00 157,67 17,25 2.80 .00 15,65 32.84 30,40 190.90 190.52 24,21 892,000 830,00 142,75 16.41 10.30 .00 15,31 114,34 107.50 260,80 257.09 28.27 892,000 830,00 146,07 17,74 10.30 .00 16.33 112,83 107,50 260.80 258,90 28.60 892.000 830.00 147,79 18,29 10,30 .00 16,75 111.85 107.50 260.80 259.64 28.71 892,000 830.00 154.49 19,56 10,30 .00 17,72 109,57 107,50 260,80 432.04 28,73 1612,000 720.00 172,11 17,77 • 11,00 .00 17.13 263.61 261,40 420.60 435,71 12.71 1612,000 720,00 206.34 19,12 11.00 .00 18,30 261.57 261,40 420.60 591.96 12.78 1612,000 720,00 235.64 19,67 11,00 .00 18.79 252.85 261,40 420,60 594.76 12.65 • 1612.000 720,00 501,86 20.92 11,00 .00 19.91 43.86' 261.40 420,60 596.60 11,99 2532,000 920.00 138.84 19.27 . 12.40 .00 18,37 1261,54 1260.50 1401,90 1400,38 19,17 2532,000 920.00 141.40 20.66 12,40 .00 19,49 1260,50 1260,50 1401,90 1401.90 19,47 2532,000 920.00 141.40 21,22 12,40 .00 19,93 1260,50 1260,50 1401,90 1401,90 19,59 2532,000 920.00 *141.40 22,51 12.40 .00 20.90 1260.50 1260.50 1401,90 1401.90 20.23 3382,000 850.00 130,90 20►77 12,20 .00 19,91 1232,00 1232,00 1362,90 1362,90 16,20 3382,000 850,00 130.90 22,20 12,20 .00 21,06 1232,00 1232.00 1362,90 1362.90 16,75 3382,000 850,00 130,90 22.78 12.20 .00 21.51 1232.00 1232.00 1362.90 1362,90 17,15 3382,000 850,00 130.90 24,12 12,20 ' .00 22.53 1232.00 1232400 1362.90 1362.90 17,96 3902.000 520.00 163,80 21.62 14,00 .00 20,95 1319,88 1318.00 1487►00 1483,69 14.44 3902,000 520,00 166,28 23.07 14,00 .00 22,25 1319,28 1318.00 1487,00 1485.55 . 13.27 3902,000 520,00 166.81 23.67 14,00 .00 22,79 1319,03 1318.00 1487,00 1485,84 12,87 3902,000 520.00 168,05 25,06 14,00 ,00 24,04 1318,44 1318.00 1487.00 1486,50 12.21 1 04/20/87 13:53:44 PAGE 56 SECNO XLCH TOPWID EG ELMIN CRIWS CWSEL SSTA • STCHL STCHR ENDST 10K*S 3Y64.UUU bt.UU 164,31 t1,b/ 140U ,UU n,U4 131Y,84 1318.UU 148/0U 148441) !JOY 3964.000 62,00 167,70 24.22 14.00 .00 23,68 1318.61 1318,00 1487.00 1486,31 6.83 3964,000 62.00 168,77 25,29 14.00 .00 24.76 1318.11 1318.00 1487,00 1486,88 5.67 3964.000 62.00 421.00 25.94 14.00 .00 25,31 1100,00 1318,00 1487,00 1521.00 6.62 4114,000 150,00 133.77 22.03 14.50 ,00 21,22 1432,10 1432.10 1567,30 1565,87 15,12 4114.000 150,00 135,20 24,50 14,50 .00 23,76 1432.10 1432,10 1567+30 1567,30 8.55 4114.000 150.00 135,20 25,55 14+50 .00 24,82 1432,10 1432.10 1567,30 1567.30 7,19 4114,000 150,00 135.20 26.41 14,50 .00 25.34 1432.10 1432,10 1567,30 1567,30 9,77 4654,000 540,00 132.30 22,98 15,60 .00 22.05 1492,30 . 1492,30 1624,60 1624.60 18.83 4654,000 540.00 132,30 25.09 15,60 .00 24.17 1492,30 1492,30 1624.60 1624,60 11.86 4654,000 540,00 132.30 26,06 15,60 .00 25.15 1492.30 1492.30 1624,60 1624,60 9,93 4654,000 540,00 132,30 27.07 15,60 .00 25,80 1492,30 1492,30 1624,60 1624.60 12.76 5244.000 590,00 132.13 24,12 16.40 .00 23.16 248,77 248,30 380.90 380.90 19.54 5244.000 590,00 132.60 25,91 16.40 .00 24.86 248.30 248,30 380,90 380.90 14,88 5244,000 590,00 132.60 26,77 16,40 ,00 25,71 248.30 248,30 380,90 380,90 12,84 5244,000 590,00 132,60 27.93 16,40 .00 26,52 248,30 248,30 380,90 380,90 15,10 5644,000 400,00 143.21 24.88 17.50 ,00 24,05 37,88 34,00 186,00 181,09 17,25 5644,000 400.00 151,04 26,53 17,50 .00 25,59 . 34.96 34,00 ' 186.00 186.00 14,64 5644.000 400,00 152.00 27.31 17.50 .00 26.36 34,00 34.00 186.00 186.00 12,85 5644,000 400,00 152,00 28,57 17.50 .00 27,38 34.00 34.00 186,00 186,00 13,45 • 5762,000 118,00 144,02 24.96 17,50 ,00 24.15 37.68 34.00 186.00 181,70 16,27 5762,000 118.00 151,24 26,61 17.50 .00 25,70 34.76 34,00 186.00 186.00 13.91 5762,000 118,00 152,00 27,82 17,50 ,00 27,02 34.00 34,00 186,00 186.00 9,57 5762,000 118,00 152,00 29,77 17.50 .00 28,93 34,00 34,00 186,00 186,00 7,54 6012,000 250,00 124.86 25,64 18,10 .00 24,48 31,15 26.00 167,00 156,01 25.71 6012,000 250,00 130.67 27.27 18.10 .00 25,92 29,43 26,00 167.00 160.10 22.72 6012,000 250,00 134.28 28,32 18,10 ,00 27,13 27,98 26.00 167,00 162,26 16,41 6012,000 250,00 155,17 30.21 18.10 .00 28,98 10,37 26,00 167,00 165,54 13,18 6502,000 490.00 126,76 26,84 19,10 ,00 25.78 45.08 34.80 177.90 171,83 21,98 6502.000 490.00 130,61 28,36 19.10 .00 27,04 41,89 34,80 177,90 172,50 21,35 6502.000 490,00 132.86 29,21 19.10 _.00 27.93 39,64 34,80 177,90 172.51 17,89 6502,000 490,00 138,74 30,96 19.10 .00 29.61 35,43 34.80 177.90 174.17 15.20 6541.000 39,00 128,32 27,08 19,10 .00 26.16 44,11 34.80 177,90 172,43 17,63 6541+000 39,00 131.80 28.65 19.10 .00 27,51 40,71 34.80 177.90 172.51 17,07 6541,000 39,00 133,86 29.47 19.10 .00 28,33 38,65 34,80 177,90 172.51 15,13 6541,000 39.00 139,59 31,22 19,10 ,00 29,98 35.18 34,80 177,90 174,77 13,32 6681.000 140.00 124.75 27,39 19.40 .00 26.38 13,55 9,50' 148,30 138,30 20.38 6681.000 140,00 125.85 28,96 19,40 .00 27,71 12.46 9.50 148,30 138.30 19,45 6681,000 140,00 126,49 29,76 19,40 ,00 28,49 11,81 9.50 148,30 138.30 17,33 6681,000 140,00 127,82 31.50 19,40 .00 30,10 10.49 9.50 148.30 138.31 15.26 1 04/20/87 13:53:44 PAGE 57 SECNO XLCH TOPWID EG ELMIN CRIWS CWSEL SSTA STCHL STCHR ENDS! 10K*S 6921.000 240,00 120.00 27.83 19,50 ,00 27,13 10,01 10,00 134,01 130,01 10,79 6921,000 240,00 123,99 29.42 19.50 .00 28,49 10,01 10,00 134,01 134.00 11,89 6921,000 240,00 124,00 30.18 19.50 00 29.19 10,01 10,00 134.01 134,00 11.51 6921.000 240.00 124,00 31.88 19.50 .00 30.71 1040 10,00 134.01 134,00 11,25 6931,000 10,00 117.00 27,85 19.50 .00 27,14 10,01 10.00 134,01 130.01 16,55 6931,000 10,00 121,00 29.45 19,50 .00 28.50 10.01 10,00 134.01 134.00 18.86 6931,000 10,00 121,00 30.22 19.50 .00 29,20 10,01 10.00 134,01 134,00 18.56 6931,000 10.00 124,00 31,95 19,50 .00 30,72 10.00 10.00 134,01 134,00 39.99 6Y/3000 4P,UU 11/,UU i/.Y2 1Y,N .UU t/+t,i 1U+Ui iV+VV =1,3t.Vi /01/+vn iJ+77 6973.000 42,00 121,00 29.54 19.50 .00 28.61 10.01 : 10.00 134,01 134300 18.14 6973,000 42.00 121.00 , 30.30 19,50 .00 29.31 10.01 ; 10.00 134.01 134.00 17.92 6973.000 42.00 124,00 32,12 19.50 .00 30,89 10.00 ,10,00 134,01 134.00 39,81 6983.000 10.00 120.00 27.94 19.50 ,00 27.27 10,01' 10.00 134.01 130,01 10,09 6983+000 10.00 123.99 29.56 19,50 +00 28.68 10.01 10.00 134.01 134,00 11+06 6983.000 10.00 124+00 30,33 19.50 .00 29,38 • 10,01 10,00 134,01 134.00 10,76 6983,000 10.00 124,00 32,18 19,50 +00 31,10 10,00 10.00 134.01 134.00 10.03 7103.000 120,00 130,43 28.22 20.60 .00 27,27 30.48 16,30 160,91 160.91 19,46 7103,000 120.00 138.01 29+83 20,60 .00 28.69 26.89 16.30 160.91 164.90 17,64 7103.000 120.00 139.55 30,57 20.60 .00 29.41 25,35 16.30 160.91 164.90. 16.11 7103.000 120.00 143.32 32.37 20.60 .00 31.15 21.59 16.30 160.91 164.91 13.18 7483.000 380,00 121,86 28.83 21.30 .00 27.82 29,84 22,50 165,00 151+71 12,62 7483.000 380.00 126,95 30,43 21.30 .00 29.18 28+05 22,50 165.00 155.00 12.44 7483.000 380,00 127.61 31,15 21.30 .00 29,84 27,39 22,50 165,00 155.00 11.71 7483.000 380,00 129,16 32.89 21,30 +00 31,47 25.85 22.50 165.00 155.01 10,10 7643.000 160,00 104,91 29,22 21.70 .00 28.00 50,00 50,00 179.00 154,91 26,94 7643.000 160.00 106,35 30.87 21.70 .00 29,31 50,00 50.00 179,00 156,35 27,16 7643.000. 160.00 113.05 31,61 21,70 ,00 29.93 50.00 50.00 179.00 163.05 28.13 7643,000 160,00 115.50 33.34 21,70 .00 31,50 50,00 50,00 179,00 165.50 24.63 7653.000 10.00 99.50 29,29 21,70 +00 28.03 50,01 50.00 179,00 149.50 46.71 7653.000 10.00 99,50 30.98 21,70 .00 29.33 50.01 50.00 179.00 149,51 48.61 7653.000 10.00 105.57 31,72 21.70 .00 29.95 50.01 50.00 179.00 163,08 51,02 7653.000 10.00 108,03 33.49 21.70 .00 31,50 50,00 50,00 179+00 165.53 48.09 7725.000 72,00 99,50 29,54 21,70 +00 28,44 50,01 50,00 179,00 149.50 19.30 7725+000 72,00 99,50 31,25 21,70 +00 29.79 50,01 50.00 179,00 149.51 20.46 7725,000 72,00 106.38 32,02 21+70 .00 30.46 50,01 50.00 179.00 163,89 21.47 7725.000 72.00 108.77 33+77 21.70 .00 31.97 50.00 50,00 179.00 166.27 21.17 7735,000 10.00 105.55 29,59 21.70 .00 28,59 50,01 50,00 179.00 155.56 17.08 7735,000 10+00 113,21 31,32 21.70 .00 30,04 50.01 50.00 179,00 163,21 18.47 7735,000 10.00 114.34 32.10 21+70 .00 30.75 50.01 50.00 179.00 164.34 17.51 7735.000 10.00 116,83 33,86 21,70 +00 32,33 50.00 50,00 179.00 166,83 16+31 1 04/20/87 13:53:44 PACE 58 SECNO XLCH TOPWID EG ELWIN CRIWS CWSEL SSTA STCHL STCHR ENDS! 10K*S 7845,000 110.00 119.98 29,80 21.40 ►00 28.89 24.36 3,60 167.90 144.34 16.20 7845.000 110.00 133,68 31+58 21.40 .00 30.51 14,45 3.60 167.90 148.14 15,55 7845.000 110,00 135,70 32.35 21.40 .00 31.26 14.16 3+60 167.90 149,87 14,30 7845.000 110,00 140,30 34.12 21.40 +00 32.94 13.50 3.60 167,90 153,80 12.43 8002.000 157.00 120.74 29.94 21+40 ,00, 29.08 24.06 3.60 167.90 144.79 14.68 8002.000 157.00 134.23 31,72 21.40 .00 30,72 14+37 3.60 167.90 148.61 14+21 8002,000 157,00 136.24 32,50 21.40 +00 31.46 14.08 3.60 167,90 150,33 13,21 8002.000 157,00 140,82 34.27 21,40 +00 33,14 13.43 3,60 167,90 154,24 11.65 8092.000 90,00 109,92 30.30 22.20 .00 29.22 127,04 125.20 274.00 236,96 28.08 8092+000 90,00 120,79 32.11 22.20 .00 30,84 125.92 125.20 274,00 246.71 27.05 8092.000 90,00 123.06 32.88 22.20 .00 31.56 125,43 125.20 274,00 248.49 25.24 8092.000 90,00 238,75 34+59 22.20 .00 33.23 13.81 125.20 274,00 252,56 21.25 8402,000 310.00 114.33 30.97 21.60 .00 30,06 31,04 27,70 156,90 145+36 14.94 8402.000 310.00 119,06 32.75 21.60 .00 31,64 28.44 27.70 156,90 147.51 14.22 8402,000 310.00 120.70 33.49 21.60 .00 32.30 27.70 27.70 156.90 148.40 13.89 8402.000 310.00 122,64 35.14 21,60 +00 33,74 27.70 27.70 156.90 150.34 13.45 U tr-"- II 1.; ftjJ ,JAi" } 1Q87 �. 4$ Q ., CITY OF RENTON PARKS and RECRE'ATIOAI.•_,, Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor • John E. Webley, Dir 6 January 20, 1987 1 E D Nunes* ,11191 301 t 1 87 i fOrD:.� :9 Mr. Richard Padrick �� (7�„i,, ;;�� 501 Lyon Building �°p"" 1, „a Seattle, WA 98104 w.�j��d ? , Dear Richard: KEN • After reviewing your proposal with staff and landscape architects currently und:r IN contract to the City for the community center project in Cedar River Park, we h-vej0N come up with the following concerns: 11 1) The filling of the Stoneway property would adversely affect the park froma I visual and noise standpoint if the existing use is maintained. - The large berm and its attendant landscaping between the Carco Theatre and Stoneway property was installed to help mitigate these problems. 2) The filling of the Cedar River flood plain could adversely affect downstream properties (including the park) in the event of a flood. We would like a1di- tional information from aahydrologist concerning this potential problem. II 3) The short term traffic increase required to haul in fill material should be addressed (i.e., routes, times, days, etc.) . If Stoneway is allowed to fill the proposed 3.5 acres, our concerns include mitigation of the following: 1) The depression created between Stoneway and the Carco Theatre (park land) should be filled with clean, free-draining material with the final 12 inches being top soil suitable for plantings and turf. ' 2) The landscape materials currently in place that would be covered with fill should be replaced. Material should be of the same size. 3) Heavy landscaping should be installed along the property line to help mitigate the negative impacts of increased noise and aesthetics deterioration due tic,the use of the site. We would be pleased to work with you on the matter of plant material. 4) We would also like to review and work with you on fencing, irrigation, drainage, and proposed construction schedule if your proposal is successful. If you have any questions or comments, please call me at 235-2560. Sincerely, ' o Ci 1 Y OF RENTON ' E Li V ‘j Sam Chastain 1 Parks Superintendent FEB 161987 J 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2560 BUILDING /ZO ING DEPT. RENT( BUILDING & ZONING DEPA 'RENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - - APPLICATION NO(S) : PROPONENT : PROJECT TITLE : BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: LOCATION ; TO : 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : ENGINEERING DIVISION El TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : El UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION. El FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU 0 PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 0 POLICE DEPARTMENT El POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT El OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDE IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISIONO ; f•1 ��/EcR�,c/G7 i APPROVED 'idAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED /► �� �-�ad . �� add,./i . 4 dam, riffs rtdeo rda , 1 CITY F ROE� f "A'eNnTO�N • DATE: �/z�i�l '�� M , ;�, SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE (I•' � � �� RENT(, BUILDING & ZONING DEPA MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - DO5 - 31 , APPLICATION NO(S) : 3 -- GoS -B7, 3rn- c 2- 37 PROPONENT : . -fOr .Wwo-,\ C omaz,q t PROJECT TITLE : BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: LOCATION : TO : PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : El ENGINEERING DIVISION n TRAFFIC ENG, DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 0 UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT n POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 0 OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P ,M, ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : can IA)(. . APPROVED M APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS I I NOT APPROVED G) 100 C'2ADIriC, ( \1/4Mpt✓tmF, a T.R3E1STO /bE i.ci dep Y \ o CoMow& Gucci in ra; Sel 13Pirci, R I'Yl MI/lit/till cAF �O`- j p/ TO n-L.,lJ ,0 Fo(Z, U .-/1t({vii1 st(bissoi) 13u ib2 fi►X PO3sI a)6 FuTuiZeL P60667kINO t (XJ 5S . a GRADI k( s\--�► U, 4001 66C$ R4T 2 a 1 3WP 0-r\ 13 -1-5 e•E ¶ Dse9 dDi4ecI 1vv ,td;t4`i1 \ tiqe SiiNr'69s IDS o►tld (0 ZOLWC) C,c3u J L 0 to\AK t 5 % p k -(0 r' tssw/oLatr YaUL 110 Fu;Lt fz. , •Z Sup ,s-11NAS1 i1►� �1/4-6(1,1P1toru 12)uPP . sHOVUO r6E p Root r b Ncjoiu6 c,)7'( p lz_K/ar0K.Su A`( ?Nop iZr( LA+uc G 0 OIvL.'( c,L,CAN G 15 7o asto 1 v' Pl'pplzooto., DATE: I' SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 NVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW ET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 7.)010106 DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUARY 3. 1987 COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 12.1987 ECF - 005 - 87 APPLICATION NO(s). SPECIAL PERMIT: SP-005-87, SHORELINE MANAGEMENT;SM-002-87 PROPONENT: STONEWAY CONCRETE, INC. AND CITY OF RENTON. PARKS AND RECREATION DEPT. PROJECT TITLE: GRADING AND FILLING FOR STONEWAY CONCRETE, INC. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT TO ALLOW THE FILLING AND GRADING ON 3.88 ACRES OF PROPERTY WITH APPROXIMATELY 53,000 CUBIC YARDS OF MATERIAL IN ORDER TO BRING THE PROPERTY TO GRADE WITH THE REMAINER OF THE SITE, AND SUBSTANTIAL L Hi:11 ES DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO ALLOW n,AID FILL AND GRADING WITHIN 200 FT. OF CEDAR RIVE LOCATED DIRECTLY NORTH OF THE CEDAR RIVER AT 1915 MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY. SITE AREA: BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources }� 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing xl . 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation X 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: • ✓ LaNDscAp1N I• fUG r �rZ R I R 1W\)K 5 HULLO 04,USO 1 rvcl,uoG TOU8K, Kri s\-412u65 NJ)b 11 L )1,0 ri,zi-e- 6'�2 pk_olf\)60 w ilia r1 4--(131zos 1 wi kJ R U13- lik)c-AQ-ctP-Q.. OcA)GLPA 1-Rs&I) PU3pci5Qd cildr9 4r-kt. %)01,41, Ni-)1( Ft'c5Y- 1' cAz.c( Vl 95?-196 E- 7-161+e., ( -Oc k1ic L cN1 F Roucs i-ri ei _R6 ,6eN 3Htu r 0z j N4ovuo oo r✓6 10 13U pic4 PPR K i' APQAdat I:Yin J�z�P , ywk)(o VER_ r3 51- l/D co ti Ouz I Ili,Co 0 Zy FeR,10Os ID p\z, kA'v'1 pc.5s l(16 c ?BSION 1_. p f�l � � 012,I�1NL, a 1.5-fi lu�v (Z�t 2 0 (22ruc o l k)J sv-ov CSy6� 6�O CA 6Gez_ T��1` 1'J 1'rs 1 �2A, Darn -s- AR15 1 �RECOMMEoNDArTION: I�L I�� DNS El MITIGATED DNS f EIS REVIEWED BY: ® <e ,./\-\-"_ U.,)cl. TITLE: 2'/7.138. DATE: FORM #14 � �� SU hJ� REVISED 9/10/85 SG cN106. 7� ) � �Juuocio mc ,c, 1 Y\x-0 ‘ v l 2149N ENVIRONMENT L CHECKLIST REVIEW'SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: l DATE CIRCULATED: COMMENTS DUE: . r/S 7 EFC - APPLICATION NO(S). : �r _ PROPONENT: S n1' - f 1�/ SR /11 L ����/ I PROJECT TITLE: BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: LOCATION: SITE AREA: BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth V/ 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services `---- 16) Utilities COMMENTS: S ru,,-/e x-I \71-1) V \BB BU DING I ZONING D`PI. We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date IVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW 5, :T REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Parks DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUARY 3, 1987 COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 17.1987 ECF - 005 - 87 APPLICATION NO(s). SPECIAL PERMIT: SP-005-87, SHORELINE MANAGEMENT:SM-002-87 PROPONENT: STONEWAY CONCRETE. INC. AND CITY OF RENTON. PARKS AND RECREATION DEPT. PROJECT TITLE: GRADING AND FILLING FOR STONEWAY CONCRETE, INC. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT TO ALLOW THE FILLING AND GRADING ON 3.88 ACRES OF PROPERTY WITH APPROXIMATELY 53.000 CUBIC YARDS OF MATERIAL IN ORDER TO BRING THE PROPERTY TO GRADE WITH THE REMAINER OF THE SITE, AND SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO. ALLOW' snID FILL AND GRADING WITHIN 200 FT. OF CEDAR RIVER LOCATED DIRECTLY NORTH OF THE CEDAR RIVER AT 1915 MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY. SITE AREA: BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth + K 2) Air 3) Water X 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health • 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics .. x 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation X 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) ` Utilities COMMENTS: lee San cikr i‘f j /e//'r odr'Gf // a/J ) %or. CSC V5 BUILDING / ZONING DEPT. RECOMMENDATION: f l DNS -M MITIGATED DNS Q EIS REVIEWED BY: c/d'AA /'Gib'/! TITLE: h'/ O taareoj7 '— DATE: 2/0 /0 FORM #14 REVISED 9/10/85 :IVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW ,T • REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Polw-, DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUARY 3. 1987 COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 17,1987 ECF - 005 - 87 APPLICATION NO(s). SPECIAL PERMIT: SP-005-87, SHORELINE MANAGEMENT:SM-002-87 PROPONENT: STONEWAY CONCRETE, INC. AND CITY OF RENTON, PARKS AND RECREATION DEPT. PROJECT TITLE: GRADING AND FILLING FOR STONEWAY CONCRETE, INC. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT TO ALLOW THE FILL'ING I AND GRADING ON 3.88 ACRES OF PROPERTY WITH APPROXIMATELY 53,000 CUBIC YARDS OF MATERIAL IN• ORDER TO BRING THE PROPERTY TO GRADE WITH THE REMAINER OF THE SITE, AND SUBSTANTIAL L3 ft1 S DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO. ALLOW SAID FILL AND GRADING WITHIN 200 FT. OF CEDAR RIVER LOCATED DIRECTLY NORTH OF THE CEDAR RIVER AT 1915 MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY. j SITE AREA: BUILDING AREA (gross): • IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants • 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: 2-- 69 -0a 116c/26)14, a.) L."7-74"" 0,2 /e7eXr-c- —4"a c- re2' 0 Svc c c._ G O o�. r4716 /2�Gu -G 7 5 n t cuG l'T" OF RE WON 11ll 0 ' I9e7 BUILDING /ZONING DEPT. RECOMMENDATION: t/,"IDNS MITIGATED DNS I n EIS •REVIEWED BY: &(/- 1-1 TITLE: DATE: v FORM ##14 REVISED 9/10/85 iVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW S T • Renton Fir,n^it. I. •Fire WING D ' NT: cu A •. 'FEBRUARY 3. 1987 COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 17.1987 ECF - 005 — 87 lik1 Y G A, 'LICATION�'�1�'e1 s). SPECIAL PERMIT: SP-005-87, SHORELINE MANAGEMENT:SM-002 I87 ; UNEN2: SWAY CONCRETE, INC. AND CITY OF RENTON, PARKS AND RECREATIQN DEPT. PROJECT TITLE: GRADING AND FILLING FOR STONEWAY CONCRETE, INC. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT TO ALLOW THE FILL'ING AND GRADING ON 3.88 ACRES OF PROPERTY WITH APPROXIMATELY 53,000 CUBIC YARDS OF MATERIAL IN. ORDER TO BRING THE PROPERTY TO GRADE WITH THE REMAINER OF THE SITE, AND SUBSTANTIAL L Q h 5 DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO ALLOW' GAID FILL AND GRADING WITHIN 200 FT. OF CEDAR RIVER LOCATED DIRECTLY NORTH OF THE CEDAR RIVER AT 1915 MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY. SITE AREA: BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation i 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: CITY OF Re`ri . R.c O 91 BUILDING /ZONING DEA'i RECOMMENDATION: DNS Q MITIGATED DNS n EIS REVIEWED BY: TITLE: DATE: . y /917 I FORM #14 REVISED 9/10/85 S` r" ' .. __ IRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW Si �r �� ������ t-tB 3 1987 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: kIAc>.1 POUCg DEVELOPMENT ni-pi DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUARY 3. 1987 - COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 12,T987 - ' ECF - 005 - 87 APPLICATION NO(s). SPECIAL PERMIT: SP-005-87, SHORELINE MANAGEMENT:SM-002-87 • PROPONENT:' STffiEWAY- CONCRETE, INC. AND CITY OF RENTON, PARKS AND RECREATION DEPT. PROJECT TITLE: GRADING AND FILLING FOR STONEWAY. CONCRETE, INC. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:APPLICATION. FOR SPECIAL PERMIT TO ALLOW: THE FILLING AND GRADING ON 3.88 ACRES OF PROPERTY WITH APPROXIMATELY 53,000 CUBIC YARDS OF MATERIAL INc.ORDER TO BRING THE PROPERTY TO GRADE WITH THE REMAINER OF THE SITE, ANDiSUBSTANTIAL L 'IFS DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO ALLOW! p;ID FILL AND (GRADING WITHIN 200 FT1 OF CEDAR RIVER. LOCATED DIRECTLY NORTH OF THE CEDAR RIVER AT 1915 'MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY. SITE AREA: ' BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMMATION • 1) Earth � 0 ✓ V I 2) Air V • 3) Water V V z 4) Plants V 3 5) Animals V/ 6) Energy and Natural Resources V 7) Environmental Health ✓ 8) Land and Shoreline Use ve 9) Housing I" G, ,,, 10) Aesthetics ✓ V - 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation ✓ 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation ' V 14) Transportation _ V V (40 15) Public Services Vei 16) Utilities �/ COMMENTS: 4 . .(I/A-me, • etA . 2,. to.)-4.4. AA, +-01‘40 A-07-43‘4* " AiLe... -, 10044..a oft ItsIkOt " IAX44•44.--6 ild=441 Or - • tt.4144.4.4)44kAr- 0.44.-41- s' It..4. fa."1.4c_, k.- 1.*•4 4A..i, 40 OL¢ ' L ULK.4.34.1.44)(..,! r 7 u •. 45 . itAla4 1 - . ‘ �/�� �,�REOMMENDA ION: 4 1-1 DNSQ MITIGATED DNS �n EIS 'lF Y1 ALAT� ,L, • � - 95 1.-4.44.. 7 ?r* REVIEWED redlejAhAltAst".44.A.4k ITLE: ALA A 44. • • DATE: $rf- FORM ��14 No REaM o 4 AT PATI 1146 II ME — AP `tell is Z14(t t I -1. ) E t N de)fri PI-E-Th. 1 4,4 JIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW S r REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Tvtt, c, DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUARY 3. 1987 COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 12,1987 ECF - 005 - 87 APPLICATION NO(s). SPECIAL PERMIT: SP-005-87, SHORELINE MANAGEMENT:SM-002-87 PROPONENT: STONEWAY CONCRETE, INC. AND CITY OF RENTON, PARKS AND RECREATION DEPT. PROJECT TITLE: GRADING AND FILLING FOR STONEWAY CONCRETE, INC. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT TO ALLOW THE FILL'ING AND GRADING ON 3.88 ACRES OF PROPERTY WITH APPROXIMATELY 53,000 CUBIC YARDS OF MATERIAL IN• ORDER TO BRING THE PROPERTY TO GRADE WITH THE REMAINER OF THE SITE, AND SUBSTANTIAL L Q ,TES DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO ALLOW SAID FILL AND GRADING WITHIN 200 FT. OF CEDAR RIVER LOCATED DIRECTLY NORTH OF THE CEDAR RIVER AT 1915 MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY. SITE AREA: BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing G� 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation l/ 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: N a y " o7 j SCE 6� CITY OF RENTON ECEOVEll rc_B 1019�] J BUILDING /ZONING DEPT. _ RECOMMENDATION: DNS Q MITIGATED DNS Q EIS REVIEWED BY: EJ-2::72:4 TITLE: DATE: -- 0/577 FORM #14 REVISED 9/10/85 w /IRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SI ' REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: rfnnPP DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUARY 3. 1987 C COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 12,1987 ECF - 005 - 87 APPLICATION NO(s). SPECIAL PERMIT: SP-005-87, SHORELINE MANAGEMENT:SM-002-87 PROPONENT: STONEWAY CONCRETE, INC. AND CITY OF RENTON, PARKS AND RECREATION DEPT. PROJECT TITLE: GRADING AND FILLING FOR STONEWAY CONCRETE, INC. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT TO ALLOW THE FILLIING AND GRADING ON 3.88 ACRES OF PROPERTY WITH APPROXIMATELY 53,000 CUBIC YARDS OF MATERIAL IN. ORDER TO BRING THE PROPERTY TO GRADE WITH THE REMAINER OF THE SITE, AND SUBSTANTIAL L`UI:HIldN ES DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO ALLOW SAID FILL AND GRADING WITHIN 200 FT. OF CEDAR RIVER LOCATED DIRECTLY NORTH OF THE CEDAR RIVER AT 1915 MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY. SITE AREA: BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air ✓ 3) Water 4) Plants !/ 5) Animals t/ 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 1� 14) Transportation ✓/ 15) Public Services 16) Utilities (� COMMENTS: V ee..;gt,;=.7.—t-- RECOMMENDATION: [j DNS [ MITIGATED DNS.ir ri EIS CITY OF RENTON REVIEWED BY. TITLE• S F 1u 1987 DATE: .. / FINN #14 BUILDING /ZONIN j 5 .. 9/10/85 t r IIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW 8 1 • REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: LI-W6 s DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUARY 3. 1987 COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 17,1987 • ECF - 005 - 87 APPLICATION NO(s). SPECIAL PERMIT: SP-005-87, SHORELINE MANAGEMENT:SM-002-87 PROPONENT: STONEWAY CONCRETE, INC. AND CITY OF RENTON, PARKS AND RECREATION DEPT. PROJECT TITLE: GRADING AND FILLING FOR STONEWAY CONCRETE, INC. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT TO ALLOW THE FILL•ING AND GRADING ON 3.88 ACRES OF PROPERTY WITH APPROXIMATELY 53,000 CUBIC YARDS OF MATERIAL IN ORDER TO BRING THE PROPERTY TO GRADE WITH THE REMAINER OF THE SITE, AND SUBSTANTIAL LSHD i S DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO'. ALLOW SAID FILL AND GRADING WITHIN 200 FT. OF CEDAR RIVER 'UL LOCATED DIRECTLY NORTH OF THE CEDAR RIVER AT 1915 MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY. SITE AREA: BUILDING AREA (gross): I ' I IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR 1' MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air i 3) Water 4) Plants 1 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources . 7) Environmental Health 1 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation ' 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation I 15) Public Services 16) Utilities I COMMENTS: 7/12121 Ctell'Irm-D '4'111 CrY1 Pi /wt64f1. . 1 'fQ14-- C - 0 DING/zalING DE`1. 6dILI RECOMMENDATION: El DNS CNA_ �] MITIGATED DNS i [D EIS 10 '►� l I TITLE: . Eli REVIEWED BY: ��/C CAS-- DATE: A/ M /gy FORM #14 J REVISED 9/10/85 1 . - IIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SI' REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ?a,00.6(13 DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUARY 3. 1987 COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY ] 2,1987 ECF - 005 - 87 APPLICATION NO(s). SPECIAL PERMIT: SP-005-87, SHORELINE MANAGEMENT:SM-002-87 PROPONENT: STONEWAY CONCRETE, INC. AND CITY OF RENTON, PARKS AND RECREATION DEPT. PROJECT TITLE: GRADING AND FILLING FOR STONEWAY CONCRETE, INC. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT TO ALLOW THE FILLIING AND GRADING ON 3.88 ACRES OF PROPERTY WITH APPROXIMATELY 53,000 CUBIC YARDS OF MATERIAL IN ORDER TO BRING THE PROPERTY TO GRADE WITH THE REMAINER OF THE SITE, AND SUBSTANTIAL a6) ES DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO ALLOW ,AID FILL AND GRADING WITHIN 200 FT. OF CEDAR RIVER LOCATED DIRECTLY NORTH OF THE CEDAR RIVER AT 1915 MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY. SITE AREA: BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth ' X 2) Air 1( 3) Water X> 4) Plants l( 5) Animals x 6) Energy and Natural Resources X 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use V 9) Housing 1`�,/ 10) Aesthetics X 11) Light and Glare NI 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation Y 14) Transportation Y 15) Public Services 16) Utilities A COMMENTS: l �0/c-0C- Ro Si- ��C�' d A" `5 ---"- --a:) P-T- Riuz...- -R--- 4L4 ‘'%'e 4- -66,9iuorpie7 • RECOMMENDATION: El DNS Q MITIGATED DNS n EIS //2 REVIEWED BY: TITLE: DATE: ::—,/7-.S>7 FORM ##14 REVISED 9/10/85 0398Z s CITY OF RENTON I • , , Building & Zoning Department (206) 235-2550 ,. SHORELINE MASTER APPLICATION APPLICATION FOR: OFFICE USE ONLY: Application No. : Si'lrl -Cth c7 l SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT : . ECF No. : EC.�- 005- Srl PERMIT ' SEC-TWP-R: I_I CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT j Date Approved: I_I VARIANCE Date Denied: Publication Date: 1 I I EXEMPTION - 1 . Comprehensive Plan: • (_I `REVISION; Zoning: Water Body: STAFF USE ONLY -- ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING Date n ra� OBI Application Received By: 4) ,1LIVVQ1 i d ' - N f ) f p WEE Application Determined .To Be:r{� o Accepted o Incomplete JAN 2 ? 1987 Notification Sent On: By (Initials) : ' t)UILQING/ZONING DEPT. Date Routed: Additional Material Received by: Application 'Determined To Be: o Accepted o Incomplete E ' -, . Notification Sent On: By ( initials) : 1 In addition to the information below, the applicant should include a site map and any other pertinent information which will assist in the review of this application. 'The Building and Zoning Department reserves the right to require additional information needed to evaluate the application. APPLICANT TO PROVIDE INFORMATION REQUIRED IN ITEMS 2-10 THROUGH 14 26 BELOW: i INFORMATION: . I 1. Applicant Owner - X Purchaser Name: Stoneway Concrete, Inc. Lessee Other Mailing Address 1915 Maple Valley Hwy., Renton, ink, 98055 Phone: 226-1001 2:'r ::Namejof • Property Owner Stoneway Concrete, Inc. Mailing . Address 1915 Maple Valley Hwy., Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 226-1001 3. ..Contact/ ._ . . _ .- "' Consultant: Hugh G. Goldsmith & Associates, Inc. Atten: Dick Padrick Mailingrs 501 Lyon Bldg. , Seattle WA.98104Phone: 622-1080 . , Address y ► • . . • * PROJECT INFORMATION: 4. General location of proposed' project (give street address if any or ; • nearest street and intersection) 1915 Maple Valley Highway • Renton, Washington 98055 • • • • 5. Legal .Description (if lengthy, attach as separate sheet) f - See attached for legal description of applicants property. Fill will be placed in an approximate 50' x 360' area on the Cedar River -Park adjacent to applicants west • boundary at the Park Department's request. 6. Name of adjacent water area or wetlands : Cedar River 7. Current use of property and -existing- improvements: Concrete Batch Plant. Improvements include Batching Plant; Sand, Gravel, and Cement Storagee Bins; Equipment. Maintenance and Repair Yards and Buildings; Office Building; Paved, Hardstands; Cement Recycling Basin; Concrete Materials Storage Yardsi Landscaping[park, 8 . PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY and proposed improvements (be specific) : It-is proposed to fill approximately 3.5 Acres of the-.applicants property and 0.4 acres of park property to bring those portion of the- sites to the same elevation as. the remainder of applicant's sites. No change in use•of property is anticipated. 9 . Proposed construction costs and schedule: • • A. Total -construction cost and fair market value of proposed project include additional developments contemplated but not included in this application: Estimated Project Cost is $185,50QQ00 The land value will not change from its current $10 per square foot. • B. Construction dates (month/year) for which permit is requested: • Begin .Upon issue of annual license End=Approx. 3 to 5 yrs. from start date. 10. List any other permits for this project from state, federal , local governmental agencies or the City of Renton for which youihave applied or will apply, including the name of the issuing agency, whether the- permit has been applied for, . and if so, the date of the application, whether the application was approved or denied and the date of same, and - number of the application or permit: .- j City of Renton, Master Application - Special Permit forrGrade and Fill - Concurrent Application with Shoreline Master Application. Annual license for grading and:-filling. - - • • • • z • • • • . ITEMS 11, 12, AND 13 TO BE COMPLETED BY LOCAL OFFICIAL: 11. NATURE OF THE EXISTING SHORELINE. (Describe type• of shoreline, such . as marine, stream, lake, lagoon, marsh, bog, swamp, flood plain, floodway, delta: type of beach, such as accretion,' erosion; high bank, - low -bank, or dike;-material, such as sand, gravel, mud, clay, • rock, riprap: -and extent and type of bulkheading, if any) : • • • . . • 12. In the event that any of the proposed buildings or structures will exceed a height of thirty-five (35) feet above the average grade level, indicate the approximate location of and number of residential units, existing and potential, that will have an obstructed view. 13 . If the application involves a conditional use or variance, set forth in full that portion of the master program which provides that the proposed use may be a conditional use, or, in the case of a. variance. from which. the variance is being sought. ITEMS 14, 15, AND 16 TO BE PROVIDED BY APPLICANT: 14. If applying for a variance or a conditional use, complete the variance or conditional use form. N/A 15. Project Maps: Attach to application accurate site plan and vicinity maps. Refer to application instruction handout for map requirements . 16 . Additional information (If necessary, attach as separate sheet) : STATE OF WASHINGTON " SS CITY OF RENTON J I. Don Merlino , being duly sworn, certify that I am the above-named applicant for a permit to con- struct a substantial development pursuant to the Shoreline Management Act of 1971, and that the foregoing statements, answers, and information are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Signature Subscribed and sworn to me this .5 day of .AQAAJJLe / /9617 . Not ry Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at . • • FORM 177 MARCH 19, 1984 ORDER NO., 853207 • DESCRIPTION: PARCEL A GOVERNMENT LOTS 4 AND 7 AND THAT PORTION, IF ANY. OF GOVERNMENT LOTS 5 AND 6 AND THE SOUTHWEST 4 OF THE NORTHEAST 4, LYING SOUTHWESTERLY OF THE RENTON-MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY NO. 1140 AND NORTH OF THAT CERTAIN BOUNDARY LINE ESTABLISHED BY PARAGRAPH 10 OF THAT CERTAIN DECREE IN EQUITY ENTERED IN SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY IN CAUSE NO. 90072 ON FEBRUARY 6, 1913, ALL IN SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST. W.M.; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF LYING NORTHERLY AND WESTERLY OF A LINE DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: , BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE PACIFIC COAST RAILROAD COM- PANY'S RIGHT-OF-WAY WITH THE CENTER LINE PRODUCED NORTH 81°56' EAST OF FIRST AVENUE NORTH SHOWN AS "COUNTY ROAD" ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF CAR WORKS ADDITION TO RENTON, AS PER PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 15 OF PLATS, ON PAGE 47, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE SOUTH 23°38'45" WEST ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY 38.76 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF A COUNTY ROAD, WHICH POINT IS MARKED BY A CON- CRETE MONUMENT; THENCE ALONG SAID COUNTY ROAD LINE NORTH 86°12' EAST 99.82 FEET TO A POINT ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT WITH A RADIUS OF 256.48 FEET, WHICH POINT IS IN THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF MAPLE VALLEY ROAD;, THENCE CONTINUING ON SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE ON SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT AND PARALLEL WITH THE CENTER LINE OF SAID MAPLE VALLEY ROAD. A DISTANCE OF 180.45 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID MAPLE VALLEY ROAD LINE SOUTH 41°25' EAST 1.228.45 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF SAID LINE; THENCE SOUTH 47°32'30" WEST 273.25 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88°26'00" WEST 251.95 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 39°24'35" WEST 73.20. FEET; THENCE NORTH 79°04'40" WEST 176.04 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 27°58'20" WEST TO THE BOUNDARY LINE ESTABLISHED BY PARAGRAPH 10 OF THAT CERTAIN DECREE IN EQUITY ENTERED IN SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY IN CAUSE NO. 90072 OF FEBRUARY 6, 1913, AND TERMINUS OF SAID LINE; EXCEPT RIGHTS OF THE STATE OF •WASHINGTON IN AND TO THAT PORTION, PAST AND PRESENT, IF ANY, OF THE PROPERTY HEREIN DESCRIBED WHICH LIES BELOW THE LINE OF ORDINARY HIGH WATER OF THE CEDAR RIVER; AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF LYING NORTHERLY OF THAT CERTAIN BOUNDARY LINE ESTAB- LISHED BY PARAGRAPH 10 OF THAT CERTAIN DECREE OF EQUITY ENTERED IN SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR, KING COUNTY CAUSE NO. 90072 ON FEBRUARY 6. 1913, AND SOUTHERLY OF THE THREAD OF THE PRESENT CHANNEL OF THE CEDAR RIVER; ,mr,,- • SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. PROJECT NARRATIVE The project site is approximately 3. 5 acres of a more than 13 acre concrete batch plant site; and about 0. 4 acres of the City of Renton Cedar River Park. The park site is included in this - application at the request of, the Park and Recreation Department. The Cedar River Park is west and north of the fill site. The remainder of the concrete batch plant site is east of the fill site. The Cedar River borders the south side of the pro- ject site. Additional public land is south of the Cedar River. Approximately 53 ,000 cubic yards of fill material will be placed in the site during the three to five year life of the project. A silt fence and berm will be placed along the, Cedar River during the initial phase of work to provide erosion control for the project. The fill material will be primarily excavated earth from construction projects' throughout King County. Some broken concrete may also be placed in the fill. Concrete chunks will be limited in size to 8" in the greatest dimension. No clay material will be placed on Park Department property. The top foot on Park Department property will be top soil suitable for plantings and turf. . It is being proposed to operate from 7:00 AM to 8 :00 PM Monday through Saturday. Saturday operation is especially important during the summer construction season when a large portion of the annual ,construction output work is accomplished. Work will begin as soon as a permit is issued and will continue on a somewhat regular basis until the site is completely filled. After placement of the erosion control facilities, work will begin on the west of the site and move toward the east. Fill material will be deposited in stock piles for a period of time and then spread and compacted in 8" to 12" lifts or layers. Trucks hauling fill material will arrive at the site from east and west directions on the Maple Valley Highway. Signifi- cant heavy equipment traffic exists on the Maple Valley Highway and the additional truck traffic is expected to have minimal impact on existing traffic. During the construction season there could be an average of six to eight trucks per hour arriv- ing at the site. During the off-season there may be six to eight trucks per day arriving at the site. If .it is anticipated that more than 10 trucks per hour will arrive at the site for more than two consecutive days , the City will be notified. The • fill will be watered as necessary to keep dust from becoming a problem. There is no reasonable way to provide noise mitigation from the equipment during the initial phase of the project. As the Park property fill is completed a fence will be constructed, and existing Park landscaping replaced by the Park and Recrea- tion Department, to help mitigate equipment noise affects on the Park. The site is shown to be in the 100 year flood plain as established by the Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA) insurance rate maps , and its associated documentation. No fill will occur in the floodway. All fill in the flood plain will occur in the floodway fringe. According to the Flood Insurance Study prepared by the Federal Emergency Management Agency in November, 1980 , filling this site will not have any affect on the 100 year flood plain elevation upstream or down- stream from the site. See following table 2 from that report. Cross section I is the location on the Cedar River of the pro- posed project. Flood plain analysis, methodology is described in detail in the study. . Additional information is provided in the, application docu- ments and in the environmental checklist. . & ASSOCIATES, 'ANC. - LLL U U aUt1 um? U 111' L\URJ JUMU U U U Gi,IL Consulting Engineers Surve ors iner 501 Lyon Building SEATTLE. WASHINGTON 98...-, ' DATE JOB NO. zj /87 66/2! ATTENTION Phone 622.1080 NI.e J=e,eY �' Li,vo • NZ, TO C77Y Ol' 2/ ikJ—r©,1/ • S7e3Air_C1.L 4-r C-oivC,-tort= /�,c-c.. 14' v'U/Lni,✓cc • ZM• m/t_,�_ 4lltc ..k,,c/TAr ?'Enr77_,N vv.,4 . ("SS'Phone r H WE ARE SENDING YOU Erlittached 0 Under separate cover via the following items: • 0 Shop drawings ❑ Prints 0 Plans ❑ Samples 0 Specifications ❑ Copy of letter 0 Change order 0 COPIES DATE NO. II DESCRIPTION i & R!c I,vditL t4FFi/7 Al1117 if)/ ' fiaR t 1 e76rr..9A1 F772 .S7'nAvE-u-'Ay cb"A--te-.Q` t (--t.. J. Gill.�,,c-- / croft Ar',4;t_t r t7- 3,J J J. FEB 10"y;/ y THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as cliecked below: 0 For approval 0 Approved as submitted 0 Resubmit copies for approval Dior your use ❑ Approved as noted 0 Submit ' copies for distribution 0 As requested 0 Returned for corrections 0 Return corrected prints ❑ For review and comment ❑ • 0 FOR'BIDS DUE I 19 0 PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS 1 COPY TO I . '• r D SIGNED:I 6 tIKOJCI I1 rr►icW7I. try am.urM tf snelosuns aro not so notsd. kindly notify us at once. r .__ �Y o CITY OF REND . .1N FILE NO(S): sP-aos -611 �EL •. BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT .Lc -S1 ®„-----) sm- bda -31 ‘e‘N. 10 MASTER APPLICATION NOTE TO APPLICANT: Since this is a comprehensive application form, only those ,.ems reioted to your specific type of n applicatios) are to be completed. (Please print or type. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) APPLICANT TYPE OF APPLICATION NAME -. ' FEES Stoneway Concrete, Inc. Q REZONE*(FROM TO _ , ) • . ADDRESS 1915 Maple Valley Highway 0 SPECIAL-PENT* CITY ZIP . ® TEMPORARY PERMIT*' Renton, WA. -98.055 , ® CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT* TELEPHONE - ED SITE PLAN APPROVAL ® SPECIAL PERMIT FOR GRADE AND FILL .:$3 9 6''7r5 •226-1001 No. of Cubic Yards: ;53;;;OQ ; Q . VARIANCE* CONTACT PERSON . From Section: NAME * Justification Required i Hugh G. Goldsmith & Assoc., Inc.-Dick Padrick ! ADDRESS SUBDIVISIONS: NSA 501 Lyon Building Q SHORT PLAT CITY . ZIP Q TENTATIVE PLAT Seattle 98104 • ° Q PRELIMINARY PLAT TELEPHONE Q FINAL PLAT 622-1080 Q WAIVER • (Justification Required) NO. OF LOTS: TOWNER STONEWAY ,CONCRETE,, INC. PLAT NAME: [AND CITY OE-REN•T0N•PARK-_DEPARTMENT] I . ADDRESS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: j 1915 MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY El PRELIMINARY N/A CITY — ZIP Q FINAL RENTON 98055 P.U.D. NAME: TELEPHONE 226-1001 [] Residential Q Industrial • Q Commercial Q Mixed 1 • / LOCATION • MOBILE HOME PARKS: • PROPERTY ADDRESS NSA 1915 Maple Valley Hwy.., Renton, Till 98055 TENTATIVE EXISTING USE I PRESENT ZONING PRELIMINARY FINAL Batch Plant [and. Renton Park H-1;![ands'P-1] - PROPOSED USE Continue existing__Stoneway• PARK NAME: Concrete,bStch plant'-uae and existing;Cedar. River Park-:landsc'anine:i"�7 �- - -• - - - NUMBER OF SPACES: • ® ° ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE //$.:"--''iii'..:. . . SQ FT ACRES AREA: 18,000 0.40 ;[,Park]�� TOTAL FEES` _ $475 30.= 151,200 3.47 Stonewav STAFF USE ONLY -- ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING - ' 'CI??OF ItChRosv DA I (Ern APPLICATION RECEIVED BY: .� O '�,/a - APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE. Q1 RitOP -. JAN t71987 Accepted ( • 1 .1 '.: ) Q Incomplete Notification Sent On By: - I • (Initials) aUILD)NC/ZONJ a bEPT. • DATE ROUTED • ADDITIONAL MATERIAL RECEIVED BY: APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: �� - Q Accepted QIncomplete Notification Sent On By: • - (Initials) ROUTED TO:' _'•1 LA Building I1 Design Eng. ® Fire ji Parks • . / t i •E8 Police 1%1Policy Dev. ES Traffic Eng. 1:211Utilities • REVISED 1=37-Rd ' 7 Legal description of property (if more space is required, attach a separate sheet). See Attached for Stoneway Legal. Park property is approximately 50' x 360' on west boundary of Stoneway site. • AFFIDAVIT DON MERLINO , being duly sworn, declare that I am El authorized representative to act for the property owner,Mowner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the , information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS DAY OF %MAII,4,2 y '1987 . NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, RESIDING AT " �5c 77z 6 . (Name of Notary. Public) (Signature of Owner) , f-2 1915 Maple Valley Highway (Add.ess) - (Address) Renton, WA . 98055 ' (City) (State) , (Zip) 226-1001 (Telephone) Acceptance of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete application. Plans and other materials required to constitute a complete application are listed in the "Application Procedure." Form #174 y.:. N PROJECT NARRATIVE The project site is approximately 3. 5 acres of a more than 13 acre concrete batch plant site; and about 0. 4 acres of the City of Renton Cedar River Park. The park site is included in this application at the request of the Park and Recreation Department. The Cedar River Park is west and north of the fill site. The • remainder of the concrete batch plant site is east of the fill site. The Cedar River borders the south side of the pro- ject site. Additional public land is south of the Cedar River. Approximately 53 ,000 cubic yards of fill material will be placed in the site during the three to five year life of the project. A silt fence and berm will be placed along the Cedar River during the initial phase of work to provide erosion control for the project. The fill material will be primarily excavated earth from construction projects throughout King County. Some broken concrete may also be placed in the fill. Concrete chunks will be limited in size to 8" in the greatest dimension. No clay material will be placed on Park Department property. The top foot on Park Department property will be top soil suitable. for plantings and turf. It is being proposed to operate from 7:00 AM to 8 :00 PM Monday through Saturday. Saturday operation is especially important during the summer construction season when a large portion of the annual construction output work is accomplished. Work will begin as soon as a permit is issued and will continue on a somewhat regular basis until the site is completely filled. After placement of the erosion control facilities, work will begin on the west of the site and move toward the east. Fill material will be deposited in stock piles for a period of time' and then spread and compacted in 8" to 12" lifts or layers. Trucks hauling fill material will arrive at the site from east and west directions on the Maple Valley Highway. Signifi- cant heavy equipment traffic exists on the Maple Valley Highway and the additional truck traffic is expected to have minimal impact on existing traffic. During the construction season there could be an average of six to eight trucks per hour arriv- ing at the site. During the off-season there may be six to eight trucks per day arriving at the site. If it is anticipated that more than 10 trucks per hour will arrive at the site for more than two consecutive days , the City will be notified. The fill will be watered as necessary to keep dust from becoming a problem. There is no reasonable way to provide noise mitigation from the equipment during the initial phase of the project. As the Park property fill is completed . a fence will be constructed, and existing Park landscaping replaced by the Park and Recrea- tion Department , to help mitigate equipment noise affects on the Park. . The site is shown to be in the 100 year flood plain as established by the Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA) insurance rate maps , and its associated documentation. No fill will occur in the floodway.' All fill in the flood plain will occur in the floodway fringe. According to the Flood Insurance Study prepared by the Federal Emergency Management Agency in November, 1980 , filling this site will not have any affect on the 100 year flood plain elevation upstream or down- stream from the, site. ' See following table 2 from that report. Cross section I is the location on the Cedar River of the_ pro- posed project. Flood plain analysis methodology is described in detail in the study. ' ' Additional information is provided in the application docu- ments and in the environmental checklist. ' E 111j CITY OF RENTON Alt 6c°and' .4 PARKS and RECREATION..._;, .. .,, Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor John E. Webley, DirV6 r „ _ January 20, 1987 iK TT'.. Mr. Richard Padrick - 111Ti ':;.1111111 501 Lyon Building """ '_2:� t ' a Seattle, WA 98104 fisof 9'6° Dear Richard: ,EIT t(r•F After reviewing your proposal with staff and landscape architects currently uncl=ry11 contract to the City for the community center project in Cedar River Park, we li.ve :0N come up with the following concerns: 1) The filling of the Stoneway property would adversely affect the park from a y 11 visual and noise standpoint if the existing use is maintained. The large • berm and its attendant landscaping. between the Carco Theatre and Stoneway property was installed to help mitigate these problems. 2) The filling of the Cedar River flood plain could adversely affect downstream properties (including the park) in the event of a flood. We would like addi- tional information from a, hydrologist concerning this potential problem. 3) The short term traffic increase required to haul in fill material should be addressed (i.e. , routes, times, days, etc.) . If Stoneway is allowed to fill the proposed 3.5 acres, our concerns include mitigation of the following: 1) The depression created between Stoneway and the Carco Theatre (park land) should be filled with clean, free-draining material with the final 12 inches being top soil suitable for plantings and turf. • 2) The landscape materials currently in place that would be covered with fill should be replaced. Material should be of the same size. 3) Heavy landscaping should be installed along the property line to help mitigate the negative impacts of increased noise and aesthetics deterioration due to the use of the site. We would be pleased to work with you on the matter of plant material. 4) We would also like to review and work with you on fencing, irrigation, drainage, and proposed construction schedule if your proposal is successful. If you have any questions or comments, please call me at 235-2560. Sincerely, )(LA-- 674a-7h."..--;14-1 Sam Chastain Parks Superintendent 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2560 FLOODING SOURCE FLOODWAY BASE FLOOD WATER SURFACE ELEVATION WITH 1 WIDTH SEC EA ION VELOCITY REGULATORYI FLOODWAY MEAN WITHOUT I FLOODWAY I INCREASE CROSS SECTION DISTANCE (FEET) , (SQUARE (FEET PER FEET) SECOND) (FEET NGVD) Cedar River A 0.025 158 1280 7.7 15.0 15.0 15.0 0.0 B 0.462 144 180 10.0 18.9 18.9 18.9 0.0 C 0.767 157 1510 6.5 23.7 23.7 23.7 0.0 D 1.144 156 1020 9.6 25.7 25.7 25.7 0.0 E 1.261 120 950 10.3 27.5 27.5 27.5 0.0 --, F 1.337 135 1030 9.5 28.5 28.5 28.5 0.0 G 1.489 150 1110 8.8 30.6 30.6 30.6 0.0 H 1.679 114 950 10.3 32.5 32.5 32.5 0.0 I 1.830 135 1180 8.3 35.5 35.5 35.5 0.0 J 1.960 221 1360 7.2 37.3 37.3 37.3 0.0 K 2.038 135 1280 7.7 38.4 38.4 38.4 0.0 L 2.090 115 1210 8.1 39.5 39.5 39.5- 0.0 M 2.160 103 1160 8.5 40.7 40.7 40.7 0.0 N 2.320 110 1490 6.6 43.4 43.4 43.4 0.0 O 2.470 142 1500 6.5 45.2 45.2 45.2 0.0 P 2.730 141 1210 8.1 49.5 49.5 49.5 0.0 Q 2.900 130 1310 7.5 52.6 52.6 52.6 0.0 R 2.960 140 1220 8.1 53.6 53.6 53.6 0.0 S 3.020 150 1070 9.1 55.4 55.4 55.4 0.0 T 3.250 210 1690 5.8 60.9 60.9 61.0 0.1 U 3.370 196 1310 7.5 62.8 62.8 62.9 0.1 1Mi1es Above Mouth FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY a Federal Insurance Administration FLOODWAY DATA co CITY OF RENTON; WA rri N, (KING CO.) CEDAR RIVER 't'>,� ECF: :kcF-cxc-81 I 4y © z City of Renton Lu: sP-ooS-�-� Z � . L - coa-Si oWIMP ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST ORTED SEPT��'0�P Purpose of Checklist: • • The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). chapter 43,21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for allproposals with probable significant adverse impacts on-the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and. the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: . . This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known. or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most, cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer. or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional • information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impacts. ' • Use of Checklist for Nonproiect Proposals: (Please Type or Print Legibly) Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as_"proposal." "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. ' BACKGROUND CM OF RENTON 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: a E � L 11 W • Grading and Filling for Stoneway Concrete, Inc. U J A N 2 7 1987 • 2. Name of applicant: Stoneway Concrete, Inc. • • DUILDING/ZONING DEPT. 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact'person: Applicant: Contact Person: 1915 Maple Valley Highway Hugh G. Goldsmith & Associates, Inc. Renton, WA 98055 501. Lyon Building • 226-1001 - - Seattle, VA 98104 4. Date checklist prepared: Attn: Dick Padrick 622-1080 . 18 November 1986 . 5. Agency requesting checklist: • City of Renton Building and Zoning Department 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing. if applicable): ; Begin construction upon issue of Special Permit and Annual License. The current plan is to complete the project within three to five years. 7. Do you have any plans fo. ,.jture additions. expansions, or furt,io1 activity related to or connected with this proposal? if Yes. explain. Upon completion of the Grade and Fill Project, the existing use will continue. Existing use, on applicant's property, is primarily bulk storage of concrete products such as..pipe and large blocks and storage of sand and aggregates for batching concrete. The finished site may also be used for overnight parking of concrete and gravel trucks. Existing. use"''onpark 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will property be prepared, directly related to this proposal. is land- scaping. None 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. A portion of the project includes placing fill on Cedar River Park property. The Park Department is planning construction of a multi-use recreation facility northwest of the fill project. A building permit will be required for recreation 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, facility. if known. This application is for a Special Permit for Grade and Fill and a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Project is to fill approximately 3.47 Acres of the Owner's site with approximately 53,000 cubic yards of material" to bring this project site up to the existing grade of the remainder of Owner's site. Site area is approximately 13.2 Acres. Proposed use is to continue existing use. See 7. above. The project is also to fill approximately 0.4 acres of the Cedar River Park, with approximately 1,000 cubic yards •of material. Proposed park use is to continue existing use. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topography map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to, this checklist. Street Address 'of Project Area: • 1915 Maple Valley Hwy. ' • Renton, Wa. 98055 . . ,For Legal Description of applicant's property, see attached. Fill on Park property will be roughly 50 feet by 360 feet along the west boundary of applicant's property. , B. :ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS . EARTH ,"a.' General description of the site (circle one); Cf.& rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? ±3% across site. Concrete walls exist at some property lines. c. •What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, caly, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. USDA Soil Survey ,Classification Rh. Soil includes sand, gravel and riverwash materials.• . • d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No. Vertical and near vertical cuts were made when constructing the Maple Valley Highway in the vicinity of the site. - 2 - e. Describe the purpose. type. and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. _The site is being_filled to bring _ • it to the same grade as the. remainder of Owner's adjacent property. Fill will be non-biodegradable construction debris (earth and small chunks of portland cement concrete [pcc]) . Approx. 53,000 c.y. of material will be req'.d. f. Could erosion occur as 4 result of clearing, construction, or use? .If so. generally describe. . . • Yes." Erosion could occur if rainfall occurs during construction of the fill. Erosion control facilities will be constructed at the • . beginning of the project. See B-.l.h. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces • after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Most of the site will be covered with coarse aggregate. A portion of the site will be paved with AC or PCC. Existing vegetation adjacent to the Cedar River will remain. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: A filter cloth fence will be constructed at the downstream end of the fill area. The steeper slope adjacent to the river will be hydroseeded upon completion of construction. - • 2. AIR • a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any. generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. 1) Dust from moving construction vehicles . 2). Diesel exhaust.from construction vehicles Quantities are not known. • b. Are there any off-site sources of emission? Yes, traffic on' SR 169 is an off-site source of emission. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any:. Ordinary emission control equipment is installed on construction equipment. Fill will be watered if necessary to control dust. No extraordinary emission control measures are expected to be needed. • 3. WATER a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes. ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Yes, the Project Area has a 450 foot frontage on the Cedar diver. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) • the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Yes. The project is adjacent to the Cedar River. Project plans have been submitted with applications. • 3) • Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. • None. • - 3 - • • • 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximately quantities if known. _ No • 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan._ , According to FEMA. maps, a large portion of the site is within the 100 yr. flood plain. yNo fill will occur in the'floodway. All fill in the flood plain will occur in the floodway fringe. Approximately 13,300 C.Y. of material will be placed in the floodway fringe. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials-to surface waters? "If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated, volume of discharge. • No • • . b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and appaoximately quantities if known. • No site use water will be discharged. to ground water. Storm water •may percolate to ground water in site locations not covered with impervious material. It is expected that surface water from the project site, which reaches the ground water aquifer, will be improved because it must travel through an additional 10 feet of clean compacted earth. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals . . .; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. • N/A • c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection -and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Storm water will run off site and discharge to, the Cedar River. This is not a change from the existing site condition. It is not intended to collect the surface runoff. . 2) Could waste materials enter .ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No • • -'4 .f 7- _ • d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: . Erosion control.measures•will be constructed and maintained during the filling and grading operations.. No impact reductions will be required during site use. An approximately 50' width of the site • adjacent to the Cedar River will be hydroseeded to stabilize the • slope and to provide a biofilter for storm water runoff. 4. Plants • • a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: - o deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other o evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other o Shrubs m grass o crop or grain o Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other o water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other o other types of vegetation . b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Portions of existing vegetation on Park property will be removed and saved for replanting after the fill work is completed. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None • d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if.any: ::Hydroseed the fill slope along the shoreline of the Cedar River. Plant ivy along the fence installed along the applicant's property line. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: g• Birds. awk -heron";eagle,\ gbirdsother Mammalsde r b at, eik, beaver, other Fish:• bass, sa mon trout), herring, shellfish, other None of th se were observed on the site but are expected to be in the vicinity. b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on.or near the site. None • c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No - 5 - . d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None - • • • 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. N/A b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. • No ' v c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: None 7. Environmental Health • a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None • b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? . Operation of Stoneway Concrete Batch Plant including cementf concrete and sand and gravel ••truck traffic. Traffic noise on SR 169 adjacent to the site. - 6 - 1 - • ` 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic. construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. • Short term, construction equipment during course of grading. Hours of operation are estimated to be 7 AM to '8 PM, Monday through Saturday. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None 8. Land and Shoreline Use • a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Site is currently used to temporarily store concrete products (pipe, vaults, blocks) . Adjacent west and north is the City of Renton Cedar River Park. Adjacent east is the remainder of the concrete batch plant. Adjacent south is the Cedar River. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No • c. Describe any structures on the site. Several concrete material storage bins exist on the site. One vacant sheet metal building exists on the site. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Yes. The sheet metal building would be demolished_ and disposed of at an approved site and/or recycled. e. ' What is the current zoning classification of the site? Applicant's site is zone Heavy Industrial. Park site is zoned Public Use. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Applicant's site is designated Commercial. Park site is designated Park. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Urban Environment h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No ' i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Possibly 5 to 10 different workers would work in the vicinity of the finished project, intermittently. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None . k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: N/A - 7 - 1. Proposed measur6. �� ensure the proposal is compatibie-with existing and ' , • projected land uses and plans, if any: None - Project is continuation ofexisting conforming uses. 9. Housing • a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate_ whether high, middle, or low-income housing. N/A b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. N/A. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any:• N/A 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. N/A b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Stored concrete products may be more visible from adjacent park and from Maple Valley Highway. • c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: A 6 foot fence with ivy on the west property line will significantly - mitigate any .view -impact. A 6 foot fence with ivy, and 4-5' douglas firs at 15' centers, along the north property line, will mitigate view impact from the north. • 11. Light and Glare • a. . What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? - N/A . b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? N/A c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? N/A d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: N/A • - 8 - c , . 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Cedar River Park is adjacent to the west and north site property .lines. Cedar River. is adjacent south. . • b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so. describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation. including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Landscaping exists on Cedar River Park adjacent to project site west boundary. A fence will be constructed on Applicant's west _and north property lines to screen site-use from view. • 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. " Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No • b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: N/A 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans. if any. SR 169 provides site access. Access to project from SR 169 will be via Stoneway Batch. Plant property. (Project site and batch plant are on single parcel under one ownership) . b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximately distance to the nearest transit stop? N/A • . c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? N/A • d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). • No • - 9 - e , e. Will the project i (or occur in the immediate vicinit; f) water, rail. or • , air transportation? If so, generally describe. - • No f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. N/A g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: N/A 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for .example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. N/A 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity„natural gas,/ wateiw,efuse servioetelepfonanitary sewer septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. None C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there.be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. £ • Proponent: • Name Printed: DON MERLINO - 10 - #176 11-8-84 • MARCH 19, 1984 ORDER NO. 853207 DESCRIPTION:. PARCEL A GOVERNMENT LOTS 4 AND 7 AND THAT PORTION, IF ANY, OF GOVERNMENT LOTS 5 AND 6 AND THE SOUTHWEST 3 OF THE NORTHEAST %, LYING SOUTHWESTERLY OF THE RENTON-MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY NO. 1140 AND NORTH OF THAT CERTAIN BOUNDARY LINE-ESTABLISHED. BY PARAGRAPH 10 OF THAT CERTAIN DECREE INEQUITY ENTERED IN SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY IN CAUSE NO. 90072 ON FEBRUARY 6, 1913,.ALL IN SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M.; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF LYING NORTHERLY AND WESTERLY OF A LINE DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE PACIFIC COAST RAILROAD COM- PANY'S RIGHT-OF-WAY WITH THE CENTER LINE PRODUCED NORTH 81°56' EAST OF FIRST AVENUE NORTH SHOWN AS "COUNTY ROAD" ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF CAR WORKS ADDITION TO RENTON, AS PER PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 15 OF PLATS, ON PAGE 47,. RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE SOUTH 23°38'45" WEST ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY 38.76 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF A COUNTY ROAD, WHICH POINT IS MARKED BY A CON- CRETE MONUMENT; THENCE ALONG SAID COUNTY ROAD LINE NORTH 86°12' EAST 99.82 FEET TO A POINT ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT WITH A RADIUS OF 256.48 FEET, WHICH POINT IS IN THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF MAPLE VALLEY ROAD; THENCE CONTINUING ON SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE ON SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT AND PARALLEL WITH THE CENTER LINE OF SAID MAPLE VALLEY ROAD, A DISTANCE OF 180.45 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID MAPLE VALLEY ROAD LINE SOUTH 41°25' EAST 1,228.45 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF SAID LINE; THENCE SOUTH 47°32'30" WEST 273.25 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88°26'00" WEST 251.95 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 39°24'35" WEST 73.20 FEET; THENCE NORTH 79°04'40" .WEST 176.04 FEET; THENCE SOUTH- 27°58'20" WEST TO THE BOUNDARY LINE ESTABLISHED BY PARAGRAPH 10 OF THAT CERTAIN DECREE IN EQUITY ENTERED IN SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR KING . ' COUNTY IN CAUSE NO. 90072 OF FEBRUARY 6, 1913, AND TERMINUS OF SAID LINE; EXCEPT RIGHTS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND TO THAT PORTION, PAST AND PRESENT, IF ANY, OF THE PROPERTY HEREIN DESCRIBED WHICH LIES BELOW THE LINE OF ORDINARY HIGH WATER OF THE CEDAR RIVER; AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF LYING NORTHERLY OF THAT CERTAIN BOUNDARY LINE ESTAB- LISHED BY PARAGRAPH 10 OF THAT CERTAIN DECREE OF EQUITY ENTERED IN SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY CAUSE NO, 90072 ON FEBRUARY 6, 1913, AND SOUTHERLY OF THE THREAD OF THE PRESENT CHANNEL OF THE CEDAR RIVER; _ SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. '