Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
LUA87-076
}•! it . r r't.i~•r !` 1 }111t t ,s 1 1 1 'h. • ' ,, ... 1 t 4 y 1 i ' j - • 4 .A !. ,l, '1 VI.. 1 tl j r: • y. k '44 4 • • J .4i 4 44 .e . DECLARATION OF COVENANTS WHEREAS, Service Corporation Washington, a Washington Corporation, is the owner of the Greenwood Memorial Park in Renton, Washington, the -legal description of which is hereinafter set forth; and WHEREAS, application has been made for the issuance of a permit to excavate or continue excavation and refilling of a portion of the described property; and WHEREAS, as a condition of issuance of excavation and refilling permits, the City of Renton has required that the Declaration and Recording of these Covenants; it is HEREBY DECLARED, STATED AND COVENANTED as follows: 1. This Declaration of Covenants affects, relates to and applies to the excavated, to be excavated and filled and to be refilled portion of the following described property: The Northwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 16 Township 23 North Range 4 East W.M. EXCEPT the North 45 ' thereof; _ EXCEPT the South 15 ' thereof; EXCEPT the North 330 ' of the West 230 ' thereof (also known as the North 300 ' of the West 200 ' of Tract A of the Plat of Greenwood Cemetery, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Volume 22 of Plats, page 35, records of King County, Washington. ) 2. More specifically the area excavated and refilled is as set forth in the engineering drawings prepared by John R. Ewing and Associates, dated August 6, 1987 , and which are attached hereto as Exhibits "A" and "B" and incorporated herein by reference. 1 3 . This Declaration of Covenants shall be appurtenant to the property; shall run with the land; and shall be binding upon the Declarant, Service Corporation Washington, its successors or assigns. 4. While excavation and refilling of portions of the foregoing described property is pursuant to permits issued by the City of Renton, which permits limit to some extent the kinds of material that can be used for refilling, it is declared, recognized and acknowledged that even if excavated areas are refilled in complete compliance with City permit requirements that the property once refilled might not be suitable for any future uses or uses. 5. It is declared, recognized and acknowledged that any use or uses to which the present or subsequent owner, successor or assigns might wish to put the property might require geotechnical review to determine conditions existing under the surface and whether such soils and conditions are suitable for the intended use. 6. The present contemplated use of the portionof the subject property which is to be excavated and refilled is for cemetery purposes, and 'a certified geotechnical consultant has formulated a method for refill in the excavated area so as to be suitable for use for cemetery purposes, and absent monitoring or supervision of such refilling or absent refilling of the excavated area in the prescribed manner, the excavated and refilled area shall be subject to a complete geotechnical survey 2 S prior to reuse of the site for cemetery purposes. DATED this day of July, 1988 . SERVICE CORPORATION WASHINGTON BY: President STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss . COUNTY OF KING On this day of , 1988 , before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn personally appeared to me known to be the President of SERVICE CORPORATION WASHINGTON the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he is authorized to execute the said instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington,- residing at Seattle My Commission Expires: 3 RZA Jj \` RITTENHOUSE-ZE111AN&ASSO �'�� Geotechnical& H��drogeological co NO. /0mallNh 1400/40rh At•enue N.E. '• Bellevue• Washington 98005 I o �`^!" � ,zo6�746802� ITEM NO. P '8? 31 March 1988 W-5176-1 City of Renton City Council Municipal Building Renton, Washington 98055 Subject: Plan's Examiner Review Comments Service Corporation of Washington File No. SA-076-87 Gentlemen: We are writing this letter to discuss the hearing examiner's findings relative to Service Corporation of Washington's permit application to continue excavation and filling operations at the Greenwood Cemetery site in Renton, Washington. This letter addresses general geotechnical considerations of the hearing examiner's findings, conclusions and decision rendered on 17 March 1988 decision provided to us. Service Corporation of Washington has applied to continue to excavate sand from an existing borrow pit on the.east margin of the cemetery complex. At the time of our last site visit, the soils exposed in the pit consisted predominantly of clean, fine to medium sands. The east pit was initially planned to extend elevation 317 feet, some 30 to 40 feet below the previous existing site grades in the area. The clean, fine sand in the easternmost pit and the gravelly sand previously excavated in westerly Phase I pit, are interpreted to be glacial recessional deposits of the Vashon Stade of the Fraser Glaciation. This interpretation is confirmed by surficial geologic mapping provided by Luzier in the State of Washington/USGS Water Resources Division Water Supply Bulleting No. 28. That publication, entitled "Geology and Groundwater Resources of the Southwestern King • Service Corporation of Washington W-5176 31 March 1988 Page 2 County, Washington", provides a discussion of groundwater resources and geologic conditions, together with well logs in the Renton area. Classification of the upper sands is further substantiated by exposures of "hard pan" or glacial till at the bottom of the western Phase I excavation, near elevation 315. This till material is found stratigraphically below the glacial recessional soils. The log of an on-site well indicates some 57 feet on nonsaturated soils below the ground surface elevation. The well is reportedly located at an intermediate location between the two excavation phases. This depth or a similar thickness of nonsaturated soils should likewise be expected in the easternmost Phase II pit area as was encountered in Phase I. We understand and concur with the concerns of the hearing examiner with respect to protecting the future integrity of the aquifer from the City is presently obtaining its municipal water supplies west of the site. However, we offer the following data which indicates to us that the aquifer supply for the City is hydraulically separated from the "perched" groundwater conditions present above the glacial till which is a relatively impermeable aquiclude present at depth below this site. 1. The City of Renton well field is in a highly productive aquifer, the horizontal limits of which are defined by a glacially carved bedrock channel of the Cedar River. The relative location of the cemetery and the municpal well field are shown on Figure 1 attached with this letter. 2. The city wells are located near I-405 and are screened at depths 35 to 105 feet below the well field ground surface elevation near elevation 30 feet. This aquifer level is some 300 feet vertically in elevation below the ground surface elevation at the proposed pit bottom. 3. The surface water to be infiltrated on site as part of the final configuration is to be cleaned through sedimentation chambers and oil-water separators. This pretreatment of site surface water is intended to protect the future integrity of the local groundwater regime. Service Corporation of Washington W-5176 31 March 1988 Page 3 4. The existing perched groundwater present at the site is interpreted to be the result of the presence of the glacial till aquiclude, which is of very low permeability and serves to impede vertical groundwater movement except at exceptionally low or negligible rates. 5. Off-site migration of groundwater, if any, would therefore be horizontal rather than vertical . The horizontal distance separating the site from the Renton well fields is more than one mile. Contrary to the hearing examiners findings, such horizontal movement would allow for percolation and filtration by the normal subsurface constituents, such as soils, gravel and sands, in our opinion. 6. Previous studies by others, (Brown and Randall CH2M-Hill , 1987) have rated the overall significance of "cemetery sites" as potential contaminant sources in the City water supply to be "low", even though the probability of occurrence was rated to be "high". This finding is attributed to be the result of the hydraulic separation between the upper perched groundwater levels and the Cedar River aquifer afforded by the relatively impermeable glacial till soils and bedrock. In summary, the aquifer protection which the hearing examiner believes would be afforded by cessation of excavation recommended in the findings would be negligible, in our opinion, as the potential for communication between groundwater leaving the site, if any, in the municipal well fields is low, in our opinion. We understand Service Corporation of Washington has recently negotiated a new contract with an excavating company to continue excavation of site soils and backfill the existing pits. We have previously outlined geotechnical performance specifications so as to complete this operation to provide suitable conditions for cemetery use once the backfiliing has occurred. We concur with the hearing examiners findings that import fill materials be screened so as to exclude specific prohibited materials from the backfill . We have been contacted by Mr. Bob Anderson of Service • Service Corporation of Washington W-5176 31 March 1988 Page 4 Corporation of Washington, who has requested that Rittenhouse-Zeman & Associates perform intermittent periodic observation of the contractor's operations so as to document backfilling of the borrow pits. Such control would also allow for screening of import fill soils so as to reduce the potential of incorporation of potential contaminants in the fill mass. The hearing examiner is also concerned with respect to future covenants on the subject property. We would be pleased to discuss potential remediation efforts or modifications of contractor's operations so as to allow alternate site useage of the project site, if so desired. In our opinion, enough fill remains to be placed in the Phase I excavation so as to allow adequate modification of fill placement operations to incorporate desired cemetery uses of this parcel in the future. We trust this letter is sufficient for your present needs. Should you have any questions regarding this letter or other topics, please feel free to call at your earliest convenience. Respectfully submitted, RITTENHOUSE-ZEMAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. Okt•N a J �/ �c...4 ASHIN r%dy Kurt W. Groesch, P.E. 1* Associate 4 � •, 0°. tier ... I. ' '• I . • ---...) • ) . ••e • PREPARED IN COOPERATION WITH THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY • R.5 E. ;!*if...'•1-iiio.•.-...... Ovr-,_, •.•:%..._ ' - - --.\•,:ssst„,,,,%re...-•9/ '"*Aiii•Vlii`k4.•X-) ).,''',.c•fl l..1. 4..910-.4) '•!"..-'-': ---,.-• •-• •--•- f. - ,.. , , •1• -7, ' .\..-.0x..‘,, \N .v.,,;),,.,\'.-4. •_w,•*0-•,„•••,./.5- /km ...„-;.' ...%.,-,\X,..„..--_-).1.2;.).„ s - ,-,_ -,:•S.• -• .. .'\'‘‘, ,.:',1•• \\,.,.4i \l's1}111'1." Ottt 4ar*Ir'S.;'--- ---•-•••"-i"-' ' .....' .--D/ 1 • 'Ova'' •,,•.1):-. i• • .,-:_•• ••••-•;,.,,A-t, '' \ Nsi:k-lif. • • /' ' ,4 1,la.•'"•. ' . ... •i.i. .0 • ,0*...c••---. c?':!1:•-•,--," i `,.i 1...)/j.-/)....,t,' "::1'.....-... !i\ -' '4:7,•,....:ft ...s.-N-•,‘ :'*.•,-.....z....•.... -•,4-•• ,.„...,,,,....,;-.4.,...,...,,.........v.„...7.,,,,b),-...„... __, ,.... ., .. , 4.-av, .- i.•,,:s. \\.- ', .--jt: 2:N s ',*, .- -e +4%2_1. - \‘`‘,..., .., . ,..........-„-4 . 4-.-;...)-.---• --- 1 .I, - •-\,Y.. '‘'s\'.?i ,r'P'`..X.k."1-:.0:AV.:.\t'',,Z.-.1.\.\\•\ 1- --, -...-e--„,-,4t."-:-.. --....,--- 1);-•/?..4-1•-•••• . : - - -' ...‘'s. -'' - '' ' 1.. \%••• g-'2.•'-'‘`AWkc,:.;:...k,N,1,;`:.•- ''''.-rei..---7=1-1 .-._--_,...7i- I.. ::-., ,* • I. ,„_) ,, ,t 4. ,,,,. ) k..'-i41, ,.,; \ \ ,• ...,. , 1'.\\,,z ',7't.4:%,s..-•.. .,1:1:1\''01,,:.'''‘-.4;:4:.' st..-`,., :e•Ir.-..e----7?-.;•Fa.'-.--:-.1- 1;n ,,, , ..,‘,..,,,,,, .. ....N,... -• •,;,,,,,,,,,,,,,,i,,,,...- 0,,v..,,,...,:•,...,..e. '.,,,,lit:,,,„- •,•- ...,/,‘:!,---, ... ....,-, .,, •i, •1... •V.,....1\,•---1.,‘:/*•..*:Z.,,..\l").-. 1',\• lr••-•••%7-- ' '' • .'!..:••-•,,,,4.,,..t.,s.. .4.,,St:z...4r,:....4.7.4‘. :' j t .'•' N.\ v 1?4`.....72.;7754a7:-‘,,l‘ ".'-',..'.....IN..-NNAL.1%,,er:."••"..:,.,.1.\\.,7.„;•`.. . I. r. 4,/ t„, f'. t , •.,4094111"itik :\...Lf1 .1../.•- •"--- ...• ` r:, ',...`...1,,, ,-,r'•,•-•-- • •••••- :::•••••:,,.., , •-•-•••I''':••••• •••• ‘•,•.''':•"!'•••\ '•' ''QV f r••••-7:',.4. ;:fi-A1'er--)\'-'4 ',.------- .r- f--; r ' • , , :.-(,., v i,,,,/ vv.',. •,. • ...ra ---:", ......"44',N....,...-- • -. ••••• •,•,...`-.0`• A.1•;-.":1-....-..,....0,;eLf::...-"Af.A.1.4' tr , ''.•• i \...\\...,.. <•:. ,;,..: -)-.• ', 1 1 ‘‘ • . • • . %.: ..t .. •• .,• '' k‘••••••••• •-• 4A '.1-. '' :. ,".... . ...'"-;'. .4: :-- • 0 u ."X''' .--`7.-;:r.-::I3;"*.K41-1 7:- -,1.: . . • • .. ••-.....--,....._____2L.:.:_.‘.;'4.,....,;__ • -...-,,,-. •-•• Op.. 1•!---=•. / j • -. ...,. I. •1. 1 ••• QP •'' I' • I •: .....Z.):. '.. ' 1. \.: A 2-...:.:::-1...-:'-...N-:-...'''',.•:.',. - -. coinim.- • ,. "Ft....-... ... . ,. "X.• . °P ' ' -';'').: )A . ' ''..1.' s ›fc't-) .-....sr;f:•-'.....'::° 4-'-...... - Aft 1 ..0,,, •. •,••.. , %...C'z'..'• 64*, 1..'' '••••itli.1,....j.":.-. ----;.. -,-ST' • 61 '• , 1 Gm,-.....,.,, g r...i.-.2.."...;,.!..--,:v-N-. ,...,^..'.\-\ \ • ... • .18 •1,,......;:.'...r!.:;'...':-FP:-..ks'%•:'j•'Ili 9 '• : ''..''' ,.--,• .(C1--i • •*•••• --'-- 7 v• . :-..:..i: .!• .- -;•' l 1!'. Al t? '. ''"-:7'.;..?ri-1- .',a:. [ '.. : '- )""".7-' \-. N . . ,.... •. \\'.. •.''. .!7Z 1 ', '-'.,. % , --_ '''''..:1 )2 .:..\ i • k '1. .; i-,i'''....% .... 7C:.-. .':*::• '. : - v':•.\..'N .'.' iirta ......,..7,.,..,.. .- .i.‘711,1-•-•: ',',,, ..,-.,-.---,.. ). \-.....„-.0 ; .... ::., . ...... ,.... .., • 1,, •• 2‘.1.\•. ,..,••••\•:,..•\,., ,... . 7 ••.•.\r,\•, . In111 , .,'44,,,;:i•!,,, ,,. :•-:!-•,%...-,1.1g., - ••••.1. r .....'Prekl 4.4- 5 4ri_ . . - : .• .... -,..,_;.,...- . - .,,,. y ... .. \ .•,. f.....‘...6,1.c • •VI: , • ,,... .,..'• ,I.,Z.f4.1.?%,•,f- -•,k,'.•,,,,;•f'•:• •- • ,, s • . • '. % .. --. : -. -2,,,r....-- .-_.-7----- „....,:::,....:....,;.:..,:..2-,__:_:z, ...z?.?1.4.LP' W: 1, .•\....., . \. ;. •.• ,•,. ,••••,,....,.. ... ,,.: i :. .- ....: - 3. '' -. • -,- . ..;:, T.-- 7..A• ,.•,.; .7-:-.:•••,,777.--T---••=41--7,--7:3:Tr. ;• - v.• -, .... •-•.:-- ,.. . , - . , . , ms• , 4-••••.' -.., ...,• :4/, ,.; \ y--x . \• \ !," ' i • ''.. 'N i - X=:, ..' .•`:.- '-‘, ..'. --z ' • .... .. `.. ' : : • ' • •-. ::. \c l'-•:' \i• 1\\---..\'::\ ... . . '•:: r‘N. Left• -,:y --,N..;-.... pyi ..- ',\,.. P` . , ".• ''.13. ".. ••''' ;,0,- 1‘.) -* .. 7`, •-- ... ' i '-'..,. ' v 1 .1,,.\ :-. - ......2 •-,,..s.; ....... •...... .1.:-.. .. --4, -,":7S.-. !6t,..„..,,,-....z,..-_ . , - : -• 1. ..: .,,,t . )\ 1,...;• i \--.. •„,_2•., ' ',.,,. ,...,:• r...,...- 0.',. soit., 1::, f.,,,.; •,,,,, -. , , ts,--•::i,,. .,'''•,:.---f .•.) .; ...-: -, • \ ....,- \-,.,_,..2) ..,k\ - •,.. , ,•-N ' • • ,..- ---• ••• • -- -,••OF "• ...--. 4r.,1.....--•!.,-.,. .,....., ,- . k c-N\. s 4•,%:: \ • 0‘-' .' . " •' s-'' 'c\,‘ \ \\, ..\1.-'•°, \\\`. ' N 'V Nr•••••;N....W. ' 2•-.../.-..:1::_?,v,t . : -..._...) ‘''';?;,..•.,15 '.....;• i•••-.., :, • j',..)!../.,.. so,).\:•3,• ck ‘,\. ....••••,.., ,\.. .- . Qv? '..• I ;:', i:.5'.16. .1(i ''''11'..''-...--..„....-•.-,•17..,./ '• -' : _...-- , .. '-'' - ', . ' ::::.',. :-.1---s.;;,..' ‘,1',\.. \,.,. .\•,,,\- •., :4- 1'. ..',.. ..:::: '' . . 24:#cl . ci,., .,21,--z,z;,..C,'"----tv 7:5.e.';'.',i..,-:' ,. -,.--...;- '.--?•..:• 4;/0'; .. .... ...-......... .- ..--,., ! _,,',.., \dk:.., •.,, ••N \. .... ._ ..y: .....1.,..,v:I........-; u \--7e,.„,%5*-7:. k-i'i•••)•>'.... ; ...CS;44.':'...: -.'-...:.: '..--9.f." 11.1 Our ''''''4.:::‘°-.;:v.t..-:••••• ):7(.:•N) '''..'.:2\. •;:-......‘. -I\z•-:.f...!'."-.------1\2‘k ':::::.---1:: v_it.,.....4r.„4 4,-'•-•:.--.:: ::-•. , --•Pu ',,,,. tk;..,..? PA , ----7-..-•;-r.:::"'''K.:-,ks:-,-.--•• --77.:-..-\---,-,,.....;.:,-_..,,,,_--.......----..,...,____..,, 4.:::•• .'\i'7'... '''''. - -", . '' 'n)-4•:.*-"on-i. ''',.\:‘'• •.'w''''' ,,•:- -..S"'' ..,/ : 1 ''.',o'vr., ''''":„~-,'i-eq, ...--.:* .--: :.. -.•'':,.-• .\,:',.\0•• -.•!:.-.7.-.---., .."- ••‘, -,.. . -. ,...1.214...„• I ..e:•;,••:. -4(''Quo C--'''`•:-`'.•'"''''-'77••,, ., A.;...• • i)e---",.."...'":1 ....;.' :.7 41(A\ ..kk`• ;.1 i;:' iorg.. - Y% ''. ""QVF:',:s. % ,k :: ;47.-'1••-•.4.:" ,.' /:i ';"•;''.• -• • "-....\.________„.. ' ',P.,. 1').: •• ,.'-i\f".. ,i..--- ...'._1,, .I Y..' ..414""•••• '""-..,•-•,•'-f?-..'•••C. 1 ."-..:-1/, • ---`,...%.,2,.. .1;. '''''‘..: • • -,.."..-s 'L......7,---- ' •.- - -, . -"t9iivr''.• • • • • • ,7.7-'7.-... - .....--... .,...---.. . w.c..4.-)..1,::,..:or, - , ...._. ...., ., -_,.........ins,. ....... ..,„„. . 0,r....-- '.),''.2°'s'("AelieflA Fi.eid ,' "Z•1 ''. ',...%,0 ..s'il:/4:-.....-•' '•:-4k- ''so-ni:,---:.,' ..1.41::EriTh*.L.NI . __ J.--'' 1..?."----,. 24'. ..- -::,..,_/QT-'Qu( 19 •'-i., 1.1. .7‘1:'-, r ' \.N. .• C.;.-2, 10;;;i". ::. -•;-•-...kii7i.,V.:(5vsr-•• Ci i ------... \ ---"r".'• :_r _____,.S ci.. ' f i., :-.: ,%20`......‘CT-- ..-.\':•• , i % ---• 0-4-• ".. '..N. ' •••-.:'..-1 - • 1 I -------:,:: /s. \-;:z_..1 " .-- ;:-.. . 1 ! Qua .,•t:1- ,.......z...,-7,;,..: ...... ' ‘:. •...._, 1 :, .h.... ...,-_,.. . -:-. .• •••.' :e.-==.7,:,, .! .:F../.• !='-':::_--./"---: ..::•',1 ! -,.„ ' ":""y-........, '-. :._ ,.. ,;12 -•13r ...- .1.3,,,-.-t,P.‘.-_-."...--M-rn--7::--...• .-sA.•:',:-. ...,,sne-,‘fi`Pf * --.•,:::.•••••71... •-,,-- -: .•• ,--, , .;• :. • • --Fixie,,,, - .1u ........,-,--_-... ....,•:::::zs,..1.1-•:-./.70, -,-,1 e.... ......th,15-. onj,,,, _v.t.:4 ;,..., ...• '."....Qvi ..‘• ....C. ',. (0 ‘kk."-- ;°'.Qvr.: -4.: 7,... . , _ :V .... - r- 0 -..*.-',.-;.'•• ' . ,' -'s- • ''%if.',...-•'II--.21`7•.:Ii.::..4;:.K.' - 1-,- *--:,-;qif_•:-:•;• -• e •;,.: -,7",'• ..t., - ' --•-- ,,,.-k----: - -4--,,,... *- '. .1• '-' ". \• ..). \ .. „. ,: .,.--..;, .- •• • •*•,•:',••••• •-• '-* C:1 iP \ •s' .'-' 't`7•••: ••• T. .- -. -...,-: %.*,, •• 1 ,t'' . '':•••••': ,• ' ).4i j: ....''.7••'t'`.,' ' -•..r-._\ • ..•y.;.;.. ,, r •-•- ...t,. ,-,...•;,,-,A • 7:„ ..----•'--1 .:*: ,.1:1 ,../ '‘,' :1,'. ,---'- •0 'e" 0",..\•. • • ,' • f ...:::•• ."C•:.‘",,,,, •.- ' aim:, _ '. c j ' .. .•-•: r-I:,./77-F•'•"-..i.-.,: ,••••':1 .. I •; \ 4 - ,:-•;,•,.., ....-.• .. :,,,•. • ----,. ' .1.,./;;,1 1 4.,...,,,---\•.,. .......b,si 4.2.1‘ .__..- .. . - ... • . \r,;-,.. ,Th.‘ ::-•:::.. ••••... .,....--,..,..: ...,_„:. • .. ,,.• :,....•...-.. ,,, .i. ••,..,..•• ..,"" . • -- • ,..... -,:lk'IN..15--5i.-•.c...);i:•;....g.-2.--2.----....,..:-4-•;.-:. 15.."•' '''''''' ---, 28 .'"••;. V V!%',' -. ;.7'.'....--.:..;.„;-,!•,.. -.' ..,•, ." 28 L-_,3„is \... Ovr .."‘:•ii‘ Qvi::: rn"-' ' -.-.7.7-;'1;1=-;:::'•. •,3,2....... .7, ...., , N.:. i.. • . ,. •(7,-;--. .......,:.,.... • .. , '•••' •\; \'-,- -'<-...'---7.~.'':,:, • ' ..... ,_,•(•w1/4‘ ''s..• :.,.., . ,. . , . g 1- .... • • r '1 .:••• ••k".s.: .. .' • < 1 ). .] ,__ ...A : NOvt •• ‘)°`, -"'' .\ .'„i 's 'N.., •••••-, .,::, ',1`..._ '-7 - ?);s:I.P•SiAlk. ) )\ i i ,l) \ '',. -^•-• . .'•,, ,, ;...v.,,..) .-• 'Z • •.../--/1 '.,'•":,, \ i ..-ks ..k ._ , • • ''' \il,•:Q r:::.:•-":X.•-•:\,--'-; ' I * ' 7s"rd.:= ii-:-•••:1 '.=:71`..•-'_er --;'''C.;?".", 1 ilf:'zstrZi,7,) .1,. I V:: , .•‘%.-i -1,1. . '..1. \.ce7‘ s\':::'•7::"';•;/,, .67--e ',.(----s.' . • 7.--,.."::-).-•i:''''P,... ..__ __ _.,..,;_il,!..d .:L .:... .__,,-_,,,Alr....,,, ,,..2.._. ' . • •.‘. . ';Iiil, •.....,;:. •fc ii.-.L;:a-_;.,,-,;?-; --,,,,I___1,- . • '• .•-•:,..:: ••...., , • : ,...--. , 1 V-Y..... P4I '''' ... •: D.1. • ' C7 •••N‘.1)0 A/0--•- -(24 i 1 1...1.;7:7:-:-.)--;VtoV•7;,%::-6,; .e - . • •k\ -,,,,,ea ',::••: :,). ..,, . , •. .,.. i',. ... - •-, ..„ r....• . .•., ... i. --------••,... - :'i r.- :....,,•.....--\....2!),....,,„•,..• -1- 7-.. ..v, ...44.,;:, • 07 -..,:k,.:, i .._E, ....\ ...... - ...., --. ---- • •\ - - 66,---. - •:,. .„-,,,.....",(...,..,7,..... j . •c;.,‘,. ,.. ; .., • \:„._ . *.•"•••:••-"--/)7-•(;‘- ___. ".'•'..)... ! . c 9vu •\, i. ----' -...:.-.-_-.: \ A., .; .. •,..,.....7, vr't ET t,. I•1,\.. % Ns.,-,.,,„--..,..tc, (:.,,,...... ; -- ' 7 \:1*1-•`•"),';: ' '. .' ;• •Ixik.);' :C471f.., t-11 s':'''•..-Piir. '4' -. 's' '1'V I. 1•\.__ .74.A,-,....l.: •...6' ,,,..• Ovt\ t ..c.. .)* •••• I --•••••\; 4r. • ''.*•••• -... '..n.". : ...--77-1./.-..1:.,,a3 :„ % .'"el''' ‘'':' .-• •--S7-''• • `N• ••• 00. 4-43P. Qv1:: ;•Fiy,17,._____;36%, •..,/, ,Ask. .1...0,; . *. ; ; li• '-• ;:::..Z: l• ,'.... --t r.--• ;.i.:fK"." !•.,\ .,....\ •,1 r. :'''' *-1"-- \ •\ r r:17-:,e-\•1-•••..L • '.. ! ..r'.•!. ! ...:•.!.45 s•• :Tr. 1 4... _ Figure 1 Vicinity Map Service Corporation of Washington W-5176-1 RITTENHOUSE-ZEMAN& W.O. &ASSOCIATES, INC. IIZA P" NE BY __ KWG Geotechnical&Hydrogeological Consultant DATE = 4000'--T-------1 1 1400 140th Avenue N.E. SCALE _____,___________ Bellevue, WA 98005 illildwil fr, G EXHIBIT NO. /1 - Engineers - Planners ITEM NO. S A- 0 7 4-172ii; cKMHILL Economists - Scientists May 4, 1988 S20080 .B0 liggIEMIE1 Mr. Ron Olsen MAY 41988 Utilities Engineer CITY of Renton OF RENTON 200 Mill Avenue South Engineering Dept. Renton, Washington 98055 Dear Ron: . Subject:. Service Corporation of Washington Appeal Per your request, I reviewed an April 4, 1988 letter from Ms . Maxine Motor regarding the Service Corporation of Washington appeal. Attached to this letter was a written appeal prepared by J. Anthony Hoare and a letter by Kurt W. Groesch of Rittenhouse-Zeman and Associates, Incorporated. My review focused on geohydrologic conditions in the vicinity of the existing borrow pit. • The following summarizes my comments: 1 . There is a general misconception on the part of the Hearing Examiner regarding the occurrence of groundwater beneath the pit. The "ponded" water that has been observed in the bottom of the pit is not an "exposed portion of the underground aquifer" . Based on the drillers log for an onsite well, the Greenwood Memorial Park Well (23/5-16B1) , groundwater occurs at an approximate elevation of 270. feet. According to Mr. Groesch' s letter, the bottom of the western Phase I excavation is higher in elevation (approximately 315 feet) . Ponded water observed in the bottom of the pit is probably perched groundwater. 2 . Mr. Groesch' s letter states that glacial till is present below the pit and that this till unit hydraulically separates perched groundwater from the Cedar River aquifer. While this may be true in • CH2M HILL Seattle Office 777 108th Avenue,N.E.,Bellevue,Washington 206.453.5000 P.O.Box 91500,Bellevue,Washington 98009-2050 i. Mr. Ron Olsen Page 2 May 4 , 1988 S20080 .B0 1 /2 general, the drillers log for the Greenwood Memorial Park Well does not indicate the presence of any glacial till to a depth of 113 feet, unless it was encountered in the upper 36 feet where the log is incomplete. This drillers log suggests that glacial till may not be continuous beneath the pit. 3 . Based on the information in Ms . Motor' s letter it is difficult to comment on the potential for this pit to impact the Cedar River aquifer. The vertical and lateral distance of the pit from the well field would suggest that the potential impact is small, particularly if surface water is properly managed and treated, and if clean backfill materials are used. Before any conclusions can be drawn, however, the following information would be needed: o Specifically how surface water will be managed and treated o Known or potential sources of fill materials o How fill materials will be screened for contaminants, including the frequency of inspection o Any additional investigations to be conducted to confirm onsite hydrogeologic conditions If you have any questions regarding my comments, please give me a call. Sincerely,- 2/ )34- 11(1-'1417'2 Stuart M. Brown, P.E. Project Manager jm 68.24.030. Declaration of dedication and maps—Filing The cemetery authority shall file the map or plat in the office of the recorder of the county in which all or a portion of the property is situated. The cemetery authority shall also file for record in the county recorder's office a written declaration of dedication of the property delineated on the plat or map, dedicating the property exclusively to cemetery purposes.' Enacted by Laws 1943, ch. 247, § 63. -68.24.040. Dedication, when complete Upon the filing of the map or plat and the filing of the declaration for record, the dedication is complete for all purposes and there- after the property shall be held, occupied, and used exclusively for a cemetery and for cemetery purposes.' Enacted by Laws 1943, ch. 247, § 64. 68.24.050. Constructive notice The filed map or plat and the recorded declaration are construc- tive notice to all persons of the dedication of the property to cemetery purposes.' Enacted by Laws 1943, ch. 247, § 66. Reviser's Note: This section does not apply to certain cemeteries. See RCW 68.48.070. 68.24.070. Permanency of dedication After property is dedicated to cemetery purposes pursuant to RCW 68.24.010 through 68.24.060, neither the dedication, nor the title of a plot owner, shall be affected by the dissolution of the cemetery authority, by nonuser on its part, by alienation of the • property, by any incumbrances, by sale under execution, or other- wise except as provided in this act.' Enacted by Laws 1943, ch. 247, § 67. 'Reviser's Note: "this act", see note following RCW 68.04.020. 68.24.080. Rule against perpetuities, etc., inapplicable Dedication to cemetery purposes pursuant to this act is not invalid as violating any laws against perpetuities or the suspension of the power of alienation of title to or use of property, but is expressly permitted and shall be deemed to be in respect for the dead, a provision for the interment of human remains, and a duty to, and for the benefit of, the general public.' Enacted by Laws 1943, ch. 247, § 68. 'Reviser's Note: "this act", see note following RCW 68.04.020. EXHIBIT NO. ITEM NO. S,• '7 4 aft ?... , 1 . Vo1. 22 LF 35. I . , ... • , . _ r. • GREZNVVOOCEMET± Y. , , N EAR F�Et T Oti, WASH. N.W.%4,N.E./4.5EC.Ia.T.23M.R.5 E.W.M. Scale: I In = ZOO Feet • /c.AY nor/75 Civil 5 g,nee- • 16 ve e9. ♦ro. Jx,a z N ' • i -A' F ? g 1 ' 00 v �e; JrE �- '. J/Jr ae J,ea LJ Loa{ I r; If...; h/� V/ • t C-' I Q y 4 i p o t . .1 . 1 B ; .0 ?I; 11 ` j e 1 J.zo .J:J.lc • t . 0 % •I B I V :e ae .._e JIt..� NI I.�� • 4 nmot._YC r• LJ • fdESCR)PTION F EIDICATIOPI ACKNOWLEDGMEMT > j W 'This P/o/ GrecarraodCcme%rui;i/r- N. &no`r o//men bri lfcseprr<5Pr�1s1/Jo/r>t°ylz• S/o?'e ofirosh, i/o 15, y� ..-_ •r A L/c Of /Yof. . Sec/ion /6 7:23/',2...�C undei<a,bned,✓omi o/ cno//and 0l /-ocone Cauatu ofk'/,a On/h/s 7-doe/of /1'./'1< The/hil/a/point/s N./t/,Cor.o/P/ohrhidh Toche/%his rrifr,and Geo.h'.Thcn•es ondlu3• Noy 7.-9/7,6eforr rncpersono//y oo orrdGeo. /s 30/iv/South ond 90,43:cos/o/N0Ah/ss°!f z/c U.fhornos.i//s n%/fe,owner-s•/n- .s/riph . //Thomas and L/zzie G Thomas /s rrgc,one' of Sec./6. o / une%/ere6yp/o//rc.::hereoy depc/ore sh/s James Toche//and Cha/ieo,e Toche7/,b/b ngie, shown/on ihi,o o�reeves ore ofYfX oirxnJ/ens p/o�o//s/and Pee%s o vewues•p/aces/no/seubbbner e x r/exec dolhe fo 9orrgdedro onofo o%nd • men1.5 or rrha/e rerpub/ie properly fAve/s-eh nn /hey oc%non'kdyed/o me rho//hey signed orb . - �p/7/,ond the use/hereof for oou ando//pub• sec/eel/he/he some os Yhe/-free a /.v/n/ory ow/ /hereby cerh://fiat/4-p/o/of Greenwood /,�; ,,✓poses no/,,cons.-i/en/with ifieuserherr• and deed f r the uxs ond/ourposes them e Cemetery/s based upon Co oc/ro/surreyand offorpub/c4yhrroupurpaaes,o&so the riyh//o meri/iooed sub d r/sren of Jrc/,cn/6,7 rp.23/1:,'Pa_fi i mote,o//nac a s50ry slopes for cuts orf,//s upu2 O/necs co hand and off c/a/sea/tlx day N/ho//he dis}ones ondcoa sesofonaksare /ols,p/on4s,/ror7s,eye.shonnanthsyo//i7'e ondyeor/iJ/ scc-/frchr /is/o6ore.rr:/le'. shame,hereon eorrec;Vg.. T/x monuments hot. rras,enoc%9roo i/g of a//s/reels orenae-s fb- _ been-se/ondiroe/cornerss/o.Eedam*yrver;d. ces.ek--$6orir7herren• �;y"i� Iron L.hiy/ond ' -^ - y rni',x rrherro/rre hove here un/o.ref . c /,� • • F.Dt'Howie our farads ondseo/s this 7.2doy a/May..9.4 - i•ha,.R„_ ho,,,�y,,,, �,,✓,andf✓s/xS/o.F • s„...p 0f/Yash/ialon/esidn 0454.011.E C✓i/Enoricei 'i 49/Z ' 's-y0/% 9 . C6or-/iron Toche/l ''`"-:., Fxarnmed ond o ored., ,.s/6 day o/May.. �f/Je yes Jornes Tachel/ /f354/9 • /9/7 'b"r?� P� s /ran L.fly/ond L3&G• .Thomas f/edforrecerdo//Ix reoues/0/..b nes • C/oude C•,emn.say f. 7i,che//Noy/5-/9/7, o/3 3mn,P os /ZPrlS • iy llio..rnuno/A.dofG�" f ore nedondepprored/fle/O ooucf/%y. qdcorrrdcsafdh;dnynCoruyZ�2aosfhP9o/r,,o.age 3 is iz } rAA// J /C/rc° ° . .� .urnce YrmonM�orda//. ,/Z ,. co...•,ywdr6u PP /ss • ': • 6 �j1 &oscx. , syC.P N%.ram as•.. - y `., Mro//W.'p Co. Men/horn B/oo.Seanr ,i.00 'a"Yyw,•" .. .n..,"'' ""<z` x ,=,- ,'iu { 1• tr'r.' • •I edg�µ�'YA '�4F:1"•.H,' ]1'•, l- ` - 3•�;6 ��f .A,�'�a�r � 7r.<." �.};•« ry _ _ .. .. 'r.,y;J�;t.-..-;:F•;•,�.�-^""' _ •� 'AIM 0.!.0.1. >,[ �r; 'dS.772,#7 ,".`,:; ,.,;-:l...-'�' .':o-.;:, .,.''.-'- - _ __c;-,s.:A..-a.t_; Er/ ,, ,akw1>k"c 3.. _. _• ,j, "tee �.y �['..��Y ^'�i .:� :3'.:" � _ _� '�J.:Yi',"•}-i,- ',.j✓` t�� tr..� tit -.psi 'F+: ♦ G' 4l': - - i�-F.e...i 7 Z.. fit+ -•x. ,.F'.;.-*r` 'C::•+s.-{. -3- •'�r, .a P '^=L.: `ems:.. _..'ice: - _ _ - 4dl _ =u ter' �•.. ,,rrk �' •r. <:L�•'r:4' r,Ui: -3_zr~<'i'a '•r .3S^. .�"7r.^':< i�_ •'�z 4,3'Y" ±,r ,,.,I,<.+ = s u"'YJ., �:t.. - r u,st :cam_ M --K3+r 'f"o - x-rr,k,, k,,1: -.ter S c, .,.`si. . . .�k� 9 t ,r 'F'- r' ..qq .l^•d`a.'' �.r-,3.. .j•¢ ." _^;,�;: - •'-++`'�'- r .q, I, t,- ;7 5� "�`�a .,�` .•' h. a�s,`�.c ,v: o c ",: %f n ,o- .4: 'k+u,: .is f,to, «'Y':��.•'�k;4•;`h4� ,•(.,,,,,,:,;_•' 'i -�_�t id z:,va K`�',`::{'if,,,, „4, - .: s.N � �A_ ^,C'�.,,Y''�, ... ;;. e,;i�'aW'is_aa>rt'.�;,•�.Ft.. <,=.,..F. u3.:. K.}-,_ .,r_��A'r�� �,n'''%y.T.:a ,.�.:'�lea?11.i�`:^�.,rc v - �+" w.J :.,t. v'..:4i(".7'• rti" ..:,,, S.'S,.'n csa.,, �� �✓ J :,„hv' ..x� �:5�. a. s':^,t•¢ ?,,b:.aT`-fi Y7c6,1sa�✓ ~ ,�° - �A•-,4�3`�'.A`ii�<?S:`a"�`^ .r"t:,c.- , _= F'.':°i,,�-t''V°.`,� , - - - -...%i'as= ,Lei-Zvi•`.'.;F^r"_..•,..wa,::.��:..`.i'� r?=!�,eK%�.@,µr?�"s,.`s� "nF'�1°rau:.'k'�-9hM .yp; r1',, .�v ��� .. ��"j'1.;+"�r.-�"-��'.^�a. .,�_,:-_,.....,.L A,: .., _ . .. .... ._..,ram, � �.-.�w�,x:fv-s -., r V . ..} ~1 0 " • DECLARATION OF DEDICATION REC.) F e.':r•CA5w5:- -44._.-•, The undersigned, DANIEL E. HOLMS, INC., a Washington Corporation, and the owner of the following described real property hereby dedicates said property exclusively for Cemetery • Purposes., The real property hereby declared to be dedicated tiexclusively for Cemetery Purposes is described as follows. v O -- ^ Y- _ The east 30 feet, except the North 45 feet and pxcept the South 15 feet of the v• �.: N Northeese f the Northeast quarter of Section 16, Township 23 North, Range 5 _ ± OD East W.M., and also the North 15 feet of - - the South 30 feet, except the West 30 s feet of said subdivision, all situated in _ Ring County, This dedication comprises an addition to that certain cemetery known as Greenwood Memorial Park Cemetery which cemetery is . also wholly owned by the declarant herein, Daniel E. Holms, Inc. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said corporation has caused this instrument to be executed by its proper officer this 15th day ` of December, 1986. DANIEL E. HOLMS, INC. By: p dent STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. County of King ) On this 15th day of December, 1986, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in for or the apeestate Dof Washhing'ton, • duly commissioned and sworn, personally T i -r DEC 61986 . . . - . . , - ITEM NO. : •. 01 • 4 • • • • HoLos, to me known to be the president of Daniel E. Holms, Inc., the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he is authorized to execute the said instrument on behalf of the corporation. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first above written. • Glil.c • N Y PUBLIC in •ther tate o Washington, resid . t .S ktle My Ccmnission Expire ::81a .: ti JAH1759.1481 '+ rjn!'y r. cD • rILED fool Record at Request of • 10 i W,J o l k. • (JP 9N-/04- • -2- • • • • DEC 6 1986 ., . AFFIDAVIT OF JONATHAN KAISER STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. COUNTY OF KING ) I, JONATHAN KAISER, first being duly sworn on oath, hereby state that I am over the age of 18 years, not a party to this matter and am competent to testify as follows: That on Thursday, June 2 , 1988, I recorded a document entitled Declaration of Dedication at the King County Auditor' s Office as evidenced by the copy of the King County Auditor' s receipt number 0495 and dated 88-06-02, attached hereto as Exhibit A; and That the above-identified document had been duly executed by the empowered corporate officers, Victor Evans, President, and James Shelger, Assistant Secretary, of Service Corporation Washington, Inc. , owner of the subject property; and That the above-described document dedicated forever for cemetery purposes that real property owned by Service Corporation Washington and known as Greenwood Memorial Park, Renton, Washington as described in the true copy of that Declaration of Dedication, attached hereto as Exhibit B. DATED this 6th day of June, 1988. 4 AL G.6o4'(-1 JO AT AN KA SE' BSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE me this 4-6" day of r, , 1988 NO ARY PUBLIC in an for the State ofashin on, residing at My Commission Expires: J2-'/`l' fl EXHIBIT NO e ITEM NO. Sr•o r , • • • • • • C: L :1It! tNcll?;•' • il. • • • • • • • • • :. Ca8 - 06-A2 • • • • 0495, D 7 6A0 �s ** ** 6.00 . • • ",,,,". • • El- GI .•lot' f iq �t DECLARATION OF DEDICATION (EXCLUSIVELY FOR CEMETERY PURPOSES) THE UNDERSIGNED, SERVICE CORPORATION WASHINGTON, INC. , a Washington corporation, and the owner of the following described real property hereby dedicates the following described real property exclusively for cemetery purposes: The N.W. 1/4 of the N.E. 1/4 of Section 16 Township 23 N. Range 5 E. , W.M. EXCEPT the North 45 ' thereof; -• EXCEPT the South 15 ' thereof; EXCEPT the North 330 ' of the West 230' thereof (also known as the North 300 ' of the West 200' of Tract A of the Plat of Greenwood Cemetery, according to the plat thereof recorded in . Volume 22 of Plats, page 35, records of King County, Washington) . • The foregoing described property includes real property previously dedicated exclusively for cemetery purposes and additional property which might not previously have been specifically dedicated exclusively for cemetery purposes. This dedication ,of property exclusively for cemetery purposes shall apply to all of the foregoing described property including that previously dedicated to such purposes. The foregoing described property is wholly owned by the declarant herein, Service Corporation Washington, Inc. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said corporation has caused this instrument to be executed by its proper officers this day of May, 1988. SERVICE CORPORATION WASHINGTON, INC. By: . President By: • Assistant Secretary • - 1 - ' 1 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ss. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) On this day of May, 1988 , before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of California, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared Victor M. Evans, President of Service Corporation Washington, Inc. , and James M. Shelger, Assistant Secretary of Service Corporation Washington, Inc. , the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that they are authorized to execute the said instrument on behalf of the corporation. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first above written. • NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of California residing at My commission expires: • • 400�. GREENWOOD CEMETERY _ 400 SITE ELEV. 317 300 _ _ 300 Qvr w � w • u- 200 _ 200 O 1 > too _ Qvt _10 0 w CITY . WELL FIELD ALLUVIUM ? AQUIFER Q ----_ RENTON FORMATION —100 _ _.-100 EXPLANATION GREENWOOD CEMETERY • Qvr RECESSIONAL OUTWASH DIAGRAMATIC CROSS SECTION Qvt VASHON TILL FIGURE 1 .37_. WATER LEVEL EXHIBIT NO. idas" �..� � T W.O. W-5176 RZA RITTENHOUSE-ZEMAN&ASSOCIATES, INC. rspr :r�e::b• �� 0 �� BY TB Geotechnical&Hydrogeological Consultants ITEM 1 • adflah( NO. ' �^` : DATE MAY •1988 1400 140th Avenue N.E. SCALE N.T.S. Bellevue, Washington 98005 • 3M 1 3D 1 Y 400 _ tu Hardpan w _ 400 SITE Elev 317 Glacial Till ? r cc 16B 1 >- LU 300 _ ` ? -, - � ' ' 7 -- ? Clay 2 �� Clay _ 300 w ? _ ? / Clay w �? Gravel 7 ? 7 7 z Glacial Till _.?- V 1/ ? ` ? ? z O 1.7 200 _� Sand Sand Sand _ 200 Er" Aquifer — -- ? > — r ' ?f -Hardpan ? Sand, Clay & Hardpan w o -- 7 —? nd 100 _ v 7 Sand.Aquifer�. S-a,-4--? -11 00 Bedrock Clay , Bedrock 0 _ _ 0 GREENWOOD CEMETERY DIAGRAMATIC CROSS SECTION FIGURE 2 E f°: T O e —.,, w.0. W-51 �.6_. /� �� �� � � ., RZA, INC. ��1� ..�ti�:� 8Y TB Geotechnical&Hydrogeological Consultants ripe'�"" � T . EIV- NO. �' 0 � _ Ma 1988 �1 �� DATE y 3105 A Lakeshore Drive, Suite 103 SCALE N.T.S. Anchorage,Alaska 99517 SP-076-87 /OP :12 #098 8 C.' T REODl F 9.00 i_ASHS,L :+:*:+::+:'=+. 00 11 DECLARATION OF COVENANTS WHEREAS, Service Corporation Washington, a Washington Corporation, is the owner of the Greenwood Memorial Park in Renton, .Washington, the legal description of which is hereinafter 00 abD set forth; and O • N . WHEREAS, applicationmadefor been the issuance of a Opermit to excavate or continue excavation and refilling of a ap aD portion of the described property; and WHEREAS, as a condition of issuance of excavation and refilling permits , the City of Renton has required that the Declaration and Recording of these. Covenants; it is' HEREBY DECLARED, STATED AND COVENANTED as follows: 1.- This Declaration of Covenants affects, relates to and applies to the excavated, to be excavated and filled and to be refilled portion of the following described property: • The Northwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 16 Township 23 North Range 4 East' W:M. • EXCEPT the North 45 ' thereof ; EXCEPT the South 151 thereof; EXCEPT the North 330 ' of the West 230 ' thereof (also known as the North 300 ' of the West 200 ' of Tract A of the Plat Of Greenwood Cemetery, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Volume 22 of Plats, page' 35 , • • records of King. County', Washington..) 2. More specifically the area excavated and refilled is as set forth in the engineering drawings prepared by .John R. Ewing and Associates, .dated August 6 , 19.87 , and which areattached hereto as Exhibits "A" and "B" and incorporated' herein by . reference. • ari/Z6-A. gtaAL__ 1 /o/ Gam, S- qW 9j1/ • 3 . This Declaration of Covenants shall be appurtenant to the property; shall run with the land; and shall be binding upon the Declarant, Service Corporation Washington, its successors or assigns . 4 . While excavation and refilling of portions of the foregoing described property is pursuant to permits issued by the City of Renton, which permits limit to some extent the kinds of material that can be used for refilling, it is declared, recognized and acknowledged that even if excavated areas are refilled in complete compliance with City permit requirements that the property once refilled might not be suitable for any future uses or uses . 5 . It is declared, recognized and acknowledged that any use or uses to which the present or subsequent owner, successor or assigns might wish to put the property might require geotechnical review to determine conditions existing under the surface and whether such soils and conditions are suitable for the intended use. 6 . The present contemplated use of the portion of the subject property which is to be excavated and refilled is for cemetery purposes, and a certified geotechnical consultant has formulated a method for refill in the excavated area so as to be suitable for use for cemetery purposes, and absent monitoring or supervision of such refilling or absent refilling of the excavated area in the prescribed manner, the excavated and refilled area shall be subject to a complete geotechnical survey 2 . prior to reuse of the site for cemetery purposes . DATED this 1Oth day of August, 1988 . SERVICE CORPORATION WASHINGTON i BY: Victor M. Evans President - STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ss . COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) On this 1Oth day of August, 1988 , before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of California, duly commissioned and sworn personally appeared Victor M. Evans to me known to be the President of SERVICE CORPORATION WASHINGTON, the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he is authorized to execute the said instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. R PUB IC in an the State of California, resi ing at an Diego . My Commission Expires : .vi z-`/9/ OFFICIAL SEAL 5, DIANE L. KAUFFMAN : ?:: :1 .. NOTARY PUBLIC • CALIFOhNIA _1(11 PRINCIPAL OFFICE IN ' .o ^ ��`' SAN DIEGO COUNTY 5' My Commission Expires April 26, 1991 �'S.4WD'L'Y'J'nrtitirt�°,rr5.'L+1rr'trd.^.n,a,.^ 3 1 LE'CE1Jo c .--ra • i c:.!+,rc•�rl0..l oEnvcwlce e u ". ."a .s P.•-a. , .,..,...�_._,-�__".ate_ s<>>N< .<�1.;<.:,- ---------- / ; ..._._..== ___ -- , y- .. — ' Ir - •• I. i \ - . ,• fi E I � L — -- - -- I ' I � ) . -- \''' -'::-:?,----,T7-- T-I-Lin---1-7:17:: • ! I 1`'-'--<--' . ,,____, I \ y 2 \ ,,.. i ... i , ! . .. ..... : cs1 . • f \_�— -may I- G _. .a • .. .,._ �..�^•' .--.._.. _. ._�._Y / G� \ ........1,\K.-e � N •W !^ _ a — .....<,...<. �_� Bp.ial/T12E1111 oar, a.o..n,.. --(' /,% a 1 - E Ave. ME_ N-.� - - -- '•'^-•""I-101-112O rs'i :.1-72:-..--- _._ 7.4 CNFQ• j i .1 /: --- --- ----- �v.�s...o- .__. - 'SEC. AA �-- K ._� PHASE I - - ;1 v _>OG= • I PiTIa1[7- --o naa— JOHN R.EWING AND ASSOCIATES Sp1 1 SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL ? • u.e..erf...o-uw SSN&YD..a .-r-'•--_ . . 1 L GLAL OE0CQI P(IOII IY.( �— I CNL - tR6XCT - e-e-W - J R'l,a R./..a..l.aroa lawuff-u» '� R1 J GREENWOOD CEMETERY tr- ..".....:;.‘;', •. ...cn.<.1........ Kp.yD MS.G.Io• D..1W.H C.ICAID SI •. _ ,� 40.[i CO..Ulr • "^" 1171.ox_-- c.. f D.. ae s FILL•GRADE 9 RESTOR:,.iION• 2 HYIS1.- y[SC.!IIIQI _ Ft Offflo nQ _ - — iI e.ar ..... .r..v...a u?noY. i - a ..w¢ .u�w on..n :rta o-.u..•_, rm w..._.=C,...o�ca.�u)...�i I •• ` .aw.xa>w.' r.+....�s • w.a.-muv aua.e..m-.•oa. a:a . e.s...,,.ao....0.au '...--- -2* • .....c.,.z I. A :".' .- --p-- 1\ J -...z,•.. ...a.m v .....v..wn. o h.aa.z..o w-.a... ----:". ..../ t 'i t� a....a.o.•.a moo. m."...>....a...«._ >.......... a.... ,..,..._ .7. / .�! a Q.....a .m. .. .Jar-.a......�R c....a.....a,�....,.•>a.r..au...I. I w..c..mc_.c a w.n..•.an. y // i�L.'i.lilt . �r. _ ! i—I ...--...... ...Oa F f.i.v ..,-..z_ ,,.x.,/4, .4„..s.\.. _._.— ....; ,. ...„ . _ri \ t ft.:, _3. ..-...,...;-.4c4.- . „, .7.-...i....,==. : -- Tr"- . 4 /, "- I IJ TII£ L `� .... I/J'ii 'AEG. 00 •\� I •'• ,! r .....---- -7.e., -" ....a • �. _ off. -- {�� ... •••f�.. 1 \_..� r ��� �/`� ��. Ewa _� nEC. AA "' .:=.z.:S" PHASE II ..ouxa,v - losxaa ,tsrr •Jaw R.EwING uto ASSOCIATES J 2s,; SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL 2 laLt nwvRo.a e-e-e7 j RE uac�.ea�.oroa nwlnv-.nt `J` GREENW000 CEMETERY �- larntr—` OIJOowto Sr pu.a to tatcato n '"" "+il 'wt 2 1171.ot - GUM aae •i, " FILL,GRADE 9 RESTORATION • WrIf NO rS21:11rtKn ac smr._DM a- A LAW OFFICE OF J. ANTHONY HOARE 900 WATERFRONT PLACE 1011 WESTERN AVENUE SEATTLE.WASHINGTON 98104 TELEX: 32-1037 (LEX SEA) (206) 628-3829 TELECOPIER CABLE: LEX-SEATTLE (206) 464-0125 September 19 , 1988 Ms. Maxine Motor, CMC City Clerk City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 RE: Greenwood Memorial Park Declaration of Covenants Dear Ms. Motor: Some time back we sent you a copy of the Declaration of Covenants prepared for Greenwood Memorial Park which we had sent for recording with the King County Division of Elections and Records. We have received confirmation that the Declaration was duly recorded on August 8 , 1988 , under recording number I am enclosing a copy of the first page showing the recording stamp. If you have any questions with regard to this matter, please contact this office. We thank you for your assistance. %OBI Z O M Ve truly yours, I /14 . 4e,tU)Ail-(1 P-nny M Russell Assistant to J. Anthony Hoare PMR • cc: Mr. James Shelger CITY OF RENTON SEP 2 0 1988 RECEIVED. CITY CLERK'S OFFICE ti- a' aW �� _, •� ` . `- i r � ' '*�� L s , r N. R t ' 1 J,4•(' '•0- '4 4' # • ' . l • S 1 •••.'1 •It(g., s 1. • . • ,GON�T4.Lc..-noN 6E01.lENGE LEGEND 6M.-GTf aF DEJTWPIVIT-ELEV.SCi.rL: ,. _ +.ur �5,E0 ao.me,ADA.C .ALGA T Enea ,em.mc'"Par�aa,.e�""" .a.. EUT.Y TO CO.WOW . O.WAIO OF MOFIGOE _ ,w.nnc.c w.nua v_w,�man,�coT�ecaouaG (Zo'5149o'e w.IUT%.z.a 4 P.N..). .=ao_ ,r,auv,:'V, , D w..,.._.a •1-. PHA,CCAotuG oet.e..ee Teem,.T.le Fleorriva.le0.6...-maee Torus Loco,. Hcaranitu--To ea...nem eel.x..., mA a ems m Pe,- . 7C�LE: I"-.4p' , .....aV.--- — , .aa.r .. u� 'u'bij"'" � uu+we er 90 .a%. ^ " w . .oe '\ I -- --------__ .=„a..„' e�a ,.,.,..eba_�,....m.T,au b_oa.�s,.��. ate . T._= _ -- =� --_—-----_- ate^ c ea a ..reuna area!,,a..�. i aae� .aa. .rtb eo�....., • ,.eu=�,"»'.n" Sufi..ma ��J of A..mono o�ura.�e a,`.u„ ss. it l _ @ _ _ ->n _ _____ __ _� __ ___ _ _ I I ' ::. r'. tucaouuoeo n-Z , e o • To il -- ---------------- -----1/1/(- ,....- I1,//,1,,r,,J4,47',',,-•--- ---z-----.;71-.E----1::: ;;.,.. m .s ems. C j :' , , TAoLcWAA .., . , s .., j • / ,, , . , • , " s,. -s, ,\ ,, ‘, i ,,, ..., ____, -----\ --' /I t 09tep 0471N TIIExrrJ pET'GIL 1 .,,:„.:...,„.........1,._....v.„.....7...,...1,,,,ai,,,..........,,,,,,...,...„. ' ....,.. fg-12.::....TT c.. 4 . - - . . -- � en S - 11,214.11.110.1 8" ....a.,,._a•- MOi-IQOE LIVE. I.IE. ,_».a,.e.y.e. ...---r, ,,. ,t,=a i. 5..,...,.aa..,.,s......a. • VICINITY 14P ( /. _ a _--- --- _ d'''11:z..i.- rr'' '`- - - ...>..N .oe.A.Too bad., /CGD ;'y,4 \ r �.� T 'SEC. AA . REVERES- By BOULEVARD EXCAVATING PHASE I = j / EXHIBIT.A'MAI PNIDAIED KV OWNED \• _i JOHN R.EWING AND ASSOCIATES Oe ,I SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL ' LEGAL[IESCEIPI'IbAI __ CIVIL ENGINEQiNG-LAND SURVEYORS LgDRCT .,".v".p T..ue vie a-B-W JR� (•s 1 GREENWOOD CEMETERY OF NEMT.W"SMINOTOM f]O")85]-SB]D •• S .^.,w cnr aw�.n.... .� DESIGNED BY DRAWN BY CHECKED DY - SNkeil..bN.W. • /L 1171.02 =-d "�c��-" �m °" "ev "'` FILL,GRADE d RESTORATION _ V. ��"^`DESCRIPTION ��A �- WI CNN CNN WSH • • %• . e S„ , LEGEI.Ip 1 CAN G,TUGT N IO SECLUENGE BM.-cTTY 0c DE)JTDJ.99-1-EI-E,>42../2: 59.1 cW SF3EO ...c ,.“62.UGNT 01. ornY - ... ,u nu.oc.¢i ,accur svaur>. runt ® wv. EUTYY TO GO.SLOP•. >.Ealp M OF 041GOE ao.e=4v u. .T.,o 4.u. ). ' .eo. ,r o ,..,e e, a,?=.- E2,-,.=-r . f e,,c. . .cno ur:peawace NP,w G e.��4T.. ,e..a,�re.... �>e,yro>T,� .m�. E OF PiLLEO>� OGALE, c=40f --�---�J] I f.. I ,..f.a ,. .r:-�r�.�..e.65 A „er..-,.u. >r.Er...s., P,r > .�qa . E> �re< r EEP>D7 -- _ ; 1 I— \ t't isa: • • .u. ..,. , . ' A.... .,,,re......,...,,, Al 1'' 7-ar?..-41F',..7.:÷7:.7i'l*;„";-- r) ' '-, ?"--7---4 d.:-,,-,::=..,./ Ill ' \ 12 ;„ I A,w,oa...� ' A�prT�.k....ccm-,,.- x4 _ --- III ' pgo ... m caw e�.,caTamp. . - ,''^``\ If 1 e muw m�O.._ • BASIN/TQENCU DETAIL eay ft = , _ - ---- __,,,--- - j / �aE_ _,=�4.�. - • -- - - - t-1OI.JQOE AVE. K1E. \.� S..A,.ea„.E..,..a. SEC. BB.a>.... um.y�.. e.mu,.en- s.c.a> •e.ucao u,.w y.,, n y x41 VICINITY HI l 1 riltriN oll //------ � — \ S .` PHASE I - "i-=-' " \ / AMOS. PREPARED BY SHEET _..--- JOHN R.EWING AND ASSOCIATES °Oe 0-7, i I SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONALI LEGAI.OESCQIPTION �� CIVIL ENGINEERING-LAND SURVEYORSDROIFL'T E,,^Eg_g_g7 - �� € GREENWOOD CEMETERY b. RENT.WASHINGTON _ CROW85R-BB33DESIGNED BY DRAWN BY CHECKED BY,+.,u cmr.. u .�� 0 U• SHEET CONIWI 2 1111.02 GNH 0NH WSH ',m.o.,' FILL,GRADE a RESTORATION REV.NO. DESCRIPTION BY QCEEEE TIATY •` • $ 1 COI.ISTQUGTIOAI E[1UEAlCE c O6 • I J \ Eu w1 ur e_ocn e v L I I 1 -.---------.> LECEA JIM ms..-c ,q. ueun l.avu.cueeca E,.�ve:LmLjea n�=▪ Eu te�su.„xV vovsyaaavenn�LL a.o�v. Fo,ue��..xEEPxn,� fre emce,aCnn>c�d."vn—�c'e.''' • u s ooasnuuuum cc. c n a z. ▪ "=o pa `�D�r _ VMA w e r =1 1.-. r_,-'2�.o::-.--- .,, e<..d. -.Iv:- . go----- o a .;; __ --,_ , J i \`` \; ^: � / //- . ., 7,_. . ) / -` I \ \ 1 %//, r, I I I 1/ � - ---: ..,m :Tr-.n a u—>-/ G '/2v ' _.� 1 1iNi / _ - 1--i? a ..en ' uu�xc uiuE r sat w N s ' \\\ / -- =I 1 // /// - " ; r , / ' /SCALE 1+=40' 1I II : o, �a,= /7i -. ,r 11 f/rri// I1 - e - + / / , ri iii / '1 1 yeA/ 11 ,fd-.`:,,=` o# 43 , ;j; y ''--, / /7;� I III R / 11 _ Ili 11 F.,,.,..,e.._r- te a.. 1 - 1i 1 UJ' •• IIIIA / � - �iI�r , � / jII _ry -F - _ , / ;llrl w i,,,_ \ ,` ..,.;,,,,,,.....-_,,./..,,,;‘,,,,, / ' '�� S %�� / i er \ %, ./ix\7 , ``y./ .,o..\.:®ix0`1ri: . — . o," /v " , --'�- _ � /,/ ' illI I/I -- - ....m�4 / / 4im -, ; i =a• �/ / 1u • • ..__ � j " I� I i1i11 e�\�.� b.,vt.-m -- "` t`� .�\ ii a J e,.... I i -- / // mro/ - - /' ( i /I I Ilan/ n1 r / / rIIlI - � a .r am< u ea am• ®mn VIU4L/ECU21TC FELICE tI . LI ' ` i //a_-- / / \ / ;/ / Ir !I IIIIiI T2EIJ CLI DETAIL I A 1 IIII \Q 1 " / i II ' cam.'- / II 'SEC. ea ` gg / I / II I I i fp. - .. w i "/ ,\ /I 1 II hi/IIi a • 1/r f j / 11111Fl A T \ / Illl ill N /.1 71 , tip\ �e� .`_ �o �\ �e,m e. / �w..ae�.l e•-r<rn ev vua ouuen erw..vw weo Sm+ ehle..o ..o,._:.....e... ..":i'KK,'`m"'�) EC" AA .ax. Ic � PHASE fl . _ue cusr. wv as n.m a,�<rmevn= ATRRWAL • PRE14 E BY SHEET JOHN R.EWING AND ASSOCIATES ` SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL 2 DATE ' co/A E NG...ENE.-LAND SJIN YOBS NIOIECT 8-6-87 - GREENWOOD CEMETERY �— NENT.WASHINGTON 1100)On-sass • p �ND J RE DESIGNED BY DRAWN 0Y CHECKED BY Sam CONTENT 2 HT1.02 CNN CNN WSN AL FILL,GRADE 91 RESTORATION /, REV NO. DESCRIPTNIN RY OV w9 DATE ` LAW OFFICE OF l J. ANTHONY HOARE 900 WATERFRONT PLACE 1011 WESTERN AVENUE SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98104 TELEX: 32-1037 (LEX SEA) (206)628-3829 TELECOPIER CABLE:LEX=SEATTLE (206) 464-0125 September 19, 1988 Ms. Maxine Motor, CMC City Clerk City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 RE: Greenwood Memorial Park Declaration of Covenants Dear Ms. Motor: Some time back we sent you a copy of the Declaration of Covenants prepared for Greenwood Memorial Park which we had sent for recording with the King County Division of "Elections and records. We have received confirmation that the Declaration was duly recorded on August - 8, 1988, under recording number -&aO823@98 I am enclosing a copy of the first page showing the recording stamp. If you have any questions with regard to this matter, please contact this office. We thank you for your assistance. 8(6o 12- 0988 Ve truly yours, GetwAda? P-nny M Russell . Assistant to J. Anthony Hoare PMR • cc: Mr. James Shelger CITY OF RENTON SEP 2 0 1988 RECEIVED CITY CLERK'S OFFICE r .:i R .1L. #09E. 0 R EECD F 9. 100 GNSHSL :}:*:r.*a,00 DECLARATION OF COVENANTS 11 WHEREAS, Service Corporation Washington, a Washington Corporation, is the owner of the Greenwood Memorial Park in Renton, Washington, the legal description of which is hereinafter ap °`Q` set forth; and O N . WHEREAS, application has been made for the issuance of a ap CD permit to excavate or continue excavation and refilling of a aD 00 portion of the described property; and WHEREAS, as a condition of issuance of excavation .and refilling permits, the City of Renton has required that the Declaration and Recording of these Covenants; it is HEREBY DECLARED, STATED AND COVENANTED as follows: 1. This Declaration of Covenants affects, relates to and applies to the excavated, to be excavated and filled and to be refilled portion of the following described property: The Northwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 16 Township 23 North Range 4 East W:M. EXCEPT the North 45 ' thereof; EXCEPT the South 15 ' thereof; EXCEPT the North 330 ' of the West 230 ' thereof (also known as the North 300 ' of the West 200 ' of Tract A of the Plat of Greenwood Cemetery, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Volume 22 of Plats, page 35, records of King County, Washington. ) 2. More specifically the area excavated and refilled is as - set forth in the engineering drawings prepared by John R. Ewing and Associates, dated August 6, 1987; and which are attached hereto as Exhibits "A" and "B" and incorporated herein by reference. 'lY / 1 3 . This Declaration of Covenants shall be appurtenant to the property; shall run with the land; and shall be binding upon the Declarant, Service Corporation Washington, its successors or assigns. 4. While excavation and refilling of portions ; of the foregoing described property is pursuant to permits issued by the City of Renton, which permits limit to some extent the kinds of material that can be used for refilling, it is declared, recognized and acknowledged that even if excavated areas are refilled in complete compliance with City permit requirements that. the property once refilled might not be suitable for any future uses or uses. 5. It is declared, recognized and acknowledged that any use or uses to which the present or subsequent owner, successor or assigns might wish to put the property might require geotechnical review to determine conditions existing under the surface and whether such soils and conditions are suitable for the intended use. 6. The present contemplated use of the portion of the subject property which is to be excavated and refilled is for cemetery purposes, and a certified geotechnical consultant has formulated a method for refill in the excavated area so as to be suitable for use for cemetery purposes, and absent monitoring or supervision of such refilling or absent refilling of the excavated area in the prescribed manner, the excavated and refilled area shall be subject to a complete geotechnical survey 2 prior to reuse of the site for cemetery purposes . DATED this 10th day of August, 1988 . SERVICE CORPORATION WASHINGTON i BY• Victor M. Evans President STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ss . COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) On this 10th day of August, 1988, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of California, duly commissioned and sworn personally appeared Victor M. Evans to me known to be the President of SERVICE CORPORATION WASHINGTON, the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument', and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he is authorized to execute the said instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. I _ R PUB IC in an the State of California, resi ing g at an Diego . My Commission Expires : 4/2-0// �.� OFFICIAL SEAL DIANE 1. KAUFFMAN :M +�8 NOTARY PUBLIC - CALIFOIINIA .■ i. � ° PRINCIPAL OFFICE IN : .. SAN DIEGO COUNTY f My Commission Expires April 26, 1991 3 I LECSUD • �7T...Tt0.1 .EQL'C..IGE • earn .TJ co 5.4.5.5. 5 Ll0 OF .w.cam - I SX�- •... CF.> •<w'.... . r.c ...0 i..sc<a 1 _.-�-..,-,....__..>ve>>d..._.....- nc•e.00.. _ L _ _ a. a .._:`'j `V •-'---�...tee• � A =e.,_.�., •.ter li -1 —-- t—J I N .?a``_ __�_� r. �•: TUTU* I I I .- ._—__.__ -- _— .--=-^-i1 -_ _ _ .�.. ...>a.c_a..�._.oa7.o�.ca..0.=a> ..r�..�-...:,_._a... • I i __...�`\\ ... �.. \\ 1 I i _ .\ — - - -:tea.-.,�c�....�e.>... L II a. ma jl i�^� . I r 1.L 1 .yam f • • I+ cE ~-- >Mv- ,\`/. I , •1 1 I (11 �� S .a.?=.I:,a'I j i f _ —� \ ° Qi -. .. ^ !�_--_ ._._$ ) '' i o� \ .e.a; - ( �..a '• ! 1 ••• _,& _ __. � , e.a-tu _s oen 7. El 'I. 1 .. I x5, _ ram': - a..... • 72 :._ - - ice,®� 50 ...._ ; \ 3 _.... - ------ ____--------- - ._ -- --- — SEC. BB __ . .. riowaOE AVE- /.lE. '-,e,a ..._...o__..._ `� f u.a_. ••� --•-•. wr�>r.d...re.. w.a..o.....,....,_ .1....i} • VI CM.11TY I-Inr ff ' v Ln 1 • m /� r J 1 —ice up n.R.a .,..__.I__ `., T • i-----'-- SEC.A.G. �.. .e.. .- '' � .~`'�. -7 ,1 �� _ �. ._� • PHASE I u • iaa R.t:wING A/ID ASSOCIATES �`,�^. SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL li LGLaL OEscaIPTIOLF a=R CNL L.IWaaoa•q••Lai.,awvLi48 /t •,--'-'--.,' I 1 _- �� a-s-e7 - R ra .s.I.o�o. n.uL��_LL» '� !� • GREENWOOD CEMETERY v.-uY`�- a-c'.•a a....... =Ur— ou.L n cnacuoLr / slrLaLF caermaI — • 1171.0fXX 0XX WEN ul ~�I FILL,GRADE a RESTORATION d 1 1 LIFt_ 0C5LH WI_ Ft E O.) f I _ - • • • `I COW 5T01i CT1Ol! E.ULlE63CE 1 w .moo �a 1 W LOGM,J • .w u.c..a wa: sc..a. 'u'.`�..•w�._,�.+r....... :uK < / a s. • .o... m 'z .v:i s ...moov�....-`"a„o'u�...ro.. a 4 / 1_' r Is.f.._ J 'o ..o...wsu... ....ems. . . on . __....:7—.,-----,•— •: ••••—•—•,---- • 1. 4. • • su SCALE 0.40. /- ./i1. 7 v,. / f G 1 Ii ' 1. .rv...,...o v.-M.J...4,, . L . ....•••.,.a.,..... • 1 f � 1I ----.--- N / .4//•-• ' .•' ; ' i gIZI -......, \ \//I". :•;<-`.4-..- .T• .__ _-_ __-- ----__:41:"• • } I'' `,-f '..i...re 2' •+ � - �_ • , �•\a - _ril �� / i b. / ',," al G - • ! II TO.E.ACu OET01L Vt�t<CL/�r�1'fK vF11ce .. I 1:7; 4 - --- 1 1' ..CO.ee i �� --\':: --- --ter--- - 1 y- � - �ti_/i ' /_..._� — I --- } ..�.�� ._ r..� / .o o<.�...•a anie — —�J • _ SEC. AA • • .....u... ._. a,,,5.� .. n • PHASE II •/01 N R.EWINO'M ASSOCIATES ,�, SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL Ow ClJV aw.�o•..w arwvno5 7.1oar 2 6-l-07 ...c•nM,.o1o. owlam._.a» + GREENWOOD CEMETERY or.-- . ,� JRE 11171.05 01. Y• n 4 n 4✓• a�a.lD a. O . tM.L0ar.uMia, 01.1M ow5 •an FILL.GRADE a RESTORATION 2 In r4. •_6c.coll - at lCIa»Ja.< ' r' • a , •• I LAW OFFICE OF J. ANTHONY HOARE 900 WATERFRONT PLACE 1011 WESTERN AVENUE SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98104 TELEX: 32-1037 (LEX SEA) (206) 628-3829 TELECOPIER CABLE:LEX-SEATTLE (206) 464-0125 August 11 , 1988 Jeannette Samak-McKague Senior Planner D AUG i 5 , , City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South 1 "�d Lam. �Ul 1' 1 �� Renton, WA 98055 L' RE: Greenwood Memorial Park Declaration of Covenants Dear Jeannette: Enclosed is a copy of the duly executed Declaration of Covenants which we recently received from SCI. I am sending it to King County for recording today. If everything is in order, as I understand that it is, we would request that you issue the necessary permits for excavation at this time: If there is any thing further that needs to be done before this can happen, please let us know immediately. I want to take this opportunity to thank you for your help with this matter. We sincerely appreciate the time and effort you have expended in assisting�us. (Very truly you , PennYM: Russell Assistant to J. Anthony Hoare PMR enclosure cc: Robert Anderson James Shelger Brian Dixon-Lennett db CITY OF RENTON Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney NIL Daniel Kellogg -Mark E. Barber - David M. Dean -Zanetta L. Fontes - Robert L. Sewell - Mary deVuono, Assistant City Attorneys POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEFkRTMENI CITY OF RENTON July 26, 1988 JUL 2 7 1988 TO: Jeanette Samek-McKague, Senior Plannerk II '' FROM: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RE: Review of Covenants Required as Condition of Approval File 00-076-87 Dear Jeanette: I have reviewed the covenants as above captioned and the same is approved as to legal form. Lawrence J. Warren LJW:as . cc: Mayor A8 . 26 : 63 . Post Office Box 626 - 100 S 2nd Street - Renton, Washington 98057 - (206) 255-8678 ,.. LAW OFFICE OF J. ANTHONY HOARE 900 WATERFRONT PLACE 1011 WESTERN AVENUE SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98104 TELEX: 32-1037 (LEX SEA) (206) 628-3829 TELECOPIER CABLE: LEX-SEATTLE • (206) 464-0125 July 15, 1988 u t:Y t-lvr +C�y+ ULl Fj{tiii Liu CITY OF RaiTON Ms. Jeanette Samek-McKague Q JUL 1 8 - 1988 Senior Planner �E City of Renton - -E C 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 RE: Greenwood Memorial Park Declaration of Covenants Dear Ms. Samek-McKague: I am enclosing a Declaration of Covenants which has been prepared by our office pursuant to the excavation permit being sought for work at Greenwood Memorial Park. It would be of great help to us if you or someone else in the Building and Zoning Department could review this document and offer feedback on whether it is complete and acceptable. If there is any problem or deficiency, we would request that you or the person reviewing the document notify us as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please give us a call. Very truly yo r , _ / P, ny ) . Russell Assistant to J. Anthony Hoare PMR DECLARATION OF COVENANTS WHEREAS, Service Corporation Washington, a Washington Corporation, is the owner of the Greenwood Memorial Park in Renton, Washington, the legal description of which is hereinafter set forth; and WHEREAS, application has been made for the issuance of a permit to excavate or continue excavation and refilling of a portion of the described property; and WHEREAS, as a condition of issuance of excavation and refilling permits, the City of Renton has required that the Declaration and Recording of these Covenants; it is HEREBY DECLARED, STATED AND COVENANTED as follows : 1. This Declaration of Covenants affects, relates to and applies to the excavated, to be excavated and filled and to be refilled portion of the following described property: The Northwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 16 Township 23 North Range 4 East W.M. EXCEPT the North 45 ' thereof; EXCEPT the South 15 ' thereof; EXCEPT the North 330 ' of the West 230 ' thereof (also known as the North 300 ' of the West 200 ' of Tract A of the Plat of Greenwood Cemetery, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Volume 22 of Plats, page 35 , records of King County, Washington. ) 2. More specifically the area excavated and refilled is as set forth in the engineering drawings prepared by John R. Ewing and Associates, dated August 6 , 1987 , and which are attached hereto as Exhibits "A" and "B" and incorporated herein by reference. 1 3 . This Declaration of Covenants shall be appurtenant to the property; shall run with the land; and shall be binding upon the Declarant, Service Corporation Washington, its successors or assigns . 4 . While excavation and refilling of portions of the foregoing described property is pursuant to permits issued by the City of Renton, which permits limit to some extent the kinds of material that can be used for refilling, it is declared, recognized and acknowledged that even if excavated areas are refilled in complete compliance with City permit requirements that the property once refilled might not be suitable for any future uses or uses. 5. It is declared, recognized and acknowledged that any use or uses to which the present or subsequent owner, successor or assigns might wish to put the property might require geotechnical review to determine conditions existing under the surface and whether such soils and conditions are suitable for the intended use. 6 . The present contemplated use of the portion of the subject property which is to be excavated and refilled is for cemetery purposes, and a certified geotechnical consultant has formulated a method for refill in the excavated area so as to be suitable for use for cemetery purposes, and absent monitoring or supervision of such refilling or absent refilling of the excavated area in the prescribed manner, the excavated and refilled area shall be subject to a complete geotechnical survey 2 • prior to reuse of the site for cemetery purposes. DATED this day of July, 1988 . SERVICE CORPORATION WASHINGTON BY: President STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. COUNTY OF KING On this day of , 1988 , before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn personally appeared to me known to be the President of SERVICE CORPORATION WASHINGTON the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he is authorized to execute the said instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at Seattle My Commission Expires : 3 • r, L�CEWO on�.:V rx au.ry nv'1�-.iE. -...z,^ Lw�r:._r.,>y �E3.:Gu=E CC • ' I rvRnLS`i aa7+..... CVo^.. ..u_.1 .� -__ ..-.. .tea _. ._ --e..._ V. w w>7 ti - ----� �'1 - I __ __ _ - _ . • i • N. 17, • 1 i(i ..- >-...�_-..: j — / _ • / Ell ) r- " \ \ cn • --- 7 �m �' � — _ . o ... ...._ EC. 6E3MOIJQOE GVE. .1E. s......o...,,a e_.__ __j e .. ... a 1-"'"--1 VI CIW l,v Ma,.i; ------ -- Imo _— _ —�- %j f ! jl • -- l� /. ------ ..-. -._-..-o._- - .. .. . — - '' 'SEC. AA — �`o^a a„Rz`�• 1 1 • > - PHASE I \�: ., L GLsI oESCQl Pf,Oa ���~- IOMN R.EWING AND ASSOCIATES SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL •' 0vi wa..eo..,o•uro svavercn I 8-6-87 ' / _ � •"" uavo _ -- J R�� .�Hi.a. .mo. nomua_1e�r 1' �; GREENWOOD CEMETERY _ lin.a7 4__ _ ou,a.ao.r�o.e...r cnec.[o.r c.' �9R[iTBuILL.— —_-_._.— I,, ••�-_ atdeesn n cwn own rsx a FILL,GRADE 9 RESTORATION • A . • iI ,ace,io ' ''': tea..�.,.-.�..-....�.�_.. _..:•..11........ = 1 N % ` p_ 1I -.3 tCALE l.40' ,fl B %\„/ , / o I ! -2.7fI. _ , .-.,. ;/ 1• x V ;f _. • . V litc 1 7') 1 i • :1\--,. "' • �� jt G; 1, ' %_' v• im; k �. i r 1i I `J cri ,./ ,// .f. Pq am" �, !I I •� j • -d` - I ___, sue-. 1-7: ••C� �� • r ; ! T2ENGa OETnIL U`•C• .u...00..n.a.� VI�u41_/�EG�'a1T`(FE.JGE • .. • mow- �`-- 1.... J \....� ,. . _ I_a\ % /.�� II -- SEC. AA �....�� � CAMART... ^ PHASE II • JOHN R.EWING MO ASSOCIATES a«.+,,,,- SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL 2 e-a-oTJRE GREENWOOD CEMETERY r--- - - eewc�.anuaroe goel.ev-een +�.r:Iy .7-�— �� G.tl.n.r1■r IGuN.cr [N.C..G.r • 4 .:GIT CG.... 1171'0` 01111 ON11 vin '�' „A FILL.GRADE a RESTORATION ` fn r0 IVSSATrV-4q Er AGTlQ 4SR ]1 r x 1 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ;`', ' • RENTON HEARING EXAMINER• AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE'COUN- Audrey Benner ,being first duly sworn on oath states CIL CHAMBERS 'ON''THE I SECOND FLOOR OF CITY;HALL, RENTON,WASH that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the INGTONi.ON.,TUESDAY;JUNE 7,+1988,''4 AT 9:00 A.M TOM,CONSIDERRTHE . LOWING P : NSI {,4 ; li ' 'f it k•t- r,,,.0r , fA # VALLEY DAILY NEWS E,. ► HIGHLANDS COMMUNITY-CHURCH sr • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition tApplicatlofliot d'rezone of the R-1 zone to,,.. P-1-zone according to the Comprehensive Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week.That said newspapers Plan; for pllc xpn sionfor conditional t�se permit.for.the expansion.of the,present.i are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six church on the same parcel.The B-1 zones months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published "parcel would be fully developed for church par- inpark the English language continuallyas dailynewspapers in Kent Kingcels. Locateddl atstte is 1 acres hi two g cols. 3031 N.E.:.10th St. ECF,:' County,Washington.The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal 003-88;R-003-88;CU-003-88...,CLA . newspaper order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for ZONE, f30YDEN. & KAUZLARICH by P g REZONE',; a40ar .,,.; " , .,r King County. Application'for programmatic 'rezone'•of• approximately 1.2 acres of property(three ,lots under separate ownership) from R-1 The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the Kent Edition (Single-Family Residential Use)to.L-1 (light.. Renton Edition X , Auburn Edition , (and not in Industrial Use)for future development as a light industrial use.Property located at 420, supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers 500/504 & 508 South Tobin ECF-013-88; during the below stated period.The annexed notice a R-013-88 • 11V.j;..=='-`1' -re,':':'_ Notice of Public Hearing `?CSERVICE CORPORATION OF WASH- TON ;It: :r,X ,, .4 ;y, May 27, 1988 R5 0 5 4 Remand Hearing for;consideration of new was published on 'information for an application for especial permit for fill and grade to allow'the com- pletion•of a,fill and grade operation'at the A Greenwood'Cemetery Gravel Pit. Property located at 350 Monroe Ave. N.E; ECF-066-;., The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the 87;SP-076-87 3 3 .4 ;'Legal descriptions of the files noted sum of $ . above are on file in the Renton Building and Zoning Department. '•., ',,� . ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED BE PRE- 4� SENTNTAT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON TUESDAY,`JUNE;7, 1988, AT 9:09 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS..,,:::-, Published in the Valley Daily News May 27, Subscribed and sworn to before me this 1st day of Jh1ne 1918_ 1988.R5054 Acct.'#51067, ;1,,,, ":• d•- s/ Notary blic for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, King County, Washington. VON*87 Revised 11'86 • AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the . day of , 1988, I deposited in the m ils of the United S tes a sealed envelope containing cuments. This information was sent to: NAME: G' REPRESENTING: js d SIGNED BY: SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this lc `� day of rAPoik , 1988. k_c itrut--1 8-e-e-cQJO4- 4�e��S�•.BFF�yq Notary ublic n and for the State of Washington, �O;\Ss\oN Ex,,; l�..\ residing at (Kt emu/ , therein. O • DiARy`N 1c N�v Pr • 011)44 `.dix7,�•GQ. R,, � i�. . F - oGt - vi 40. CITY OF RENTON •• BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director May 25, 1988 • Service Corporation of Washington 350 Monroe Avenue N.E. Renton, Washington 98056 RE: Service Corporation of Washington Remand Hearing ECF-066-87; SP-076-87 Gentlemen: '• The City of Renton Building and Zoning Department has scheduled a public hearing before the City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner for.June 7, 1988. The public hearing commences at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. • A copy of the staff report,will be mailed to you before the hearing. If you have any questions, please call the Building and Zoning Department at 235.2550. Sincerely, Q411)t, Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator pc: John R. Ewing & Associates Service Corporation International prnotice . . DKE:sr:cs 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 • 4► k ..' CITY OF RENTON FINANCE DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk May 13, 1988 Mr. J. Anthony Hoare Attorney at Law 1011 Western Avenue Seattle, WA 98104 Re: Appeal of Service Corporation of Washington Special Permit, File No. SP-076-87 Dear Mr. Hoare: At its regular meeting of May 9, 1988, the Renton City Council adopted the recommendation presented by the Planning and Development Committee to remand this matter to the Hearing Examiner for consideration of new information included in letters from CH2M Hill, dated 5/4/88, and from Rittenhouse-Zeman and Associates, dated 3/30/88. A copy of the Committee recommendation is attached for your information. If you require further assistance regarding this matter, please feel free to call. A copy of the Hearing Examiner's report will be sent to all parties of record upon publication. Sincerely, CITY OF RENTON Marilyn J. Petersen Deputy City Clerk cc: Mayor Council President Building & Zoning Department Hearing Examiner Enclosure 200 Mill,Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2501 May 9 , 1988 PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT TO: City Council FROM: Planning and Development Committee RE: Service Corporation of Washington/SP-076-87/Appeal From Hearing Examiner Decision dated March 17, 1988 The Planning and Development Committee met on May 6, 1988 , to consider the Appeal of Service Corporation of Washington . Applicant seeks a special permit to fill and grade at 350 Monroe Avenue N.E. Applicant seeks to remove 142 , 000 cubic yards and to fill said site with 295, 000 cubic yards of new fill . The committee found that there was new information that should be considered by the Hearing Examiner. The committee recommends that this matter be remanded to the Hearing Examiner on all issues on appeal, with direction to the Hearing Examiner to consider the information included in: 1 . The letter of May 4 , 1988, from CH2M Hill; and 2 . The letter of March 30, 1988, from Rittenhouse-Zeman and Associates . Further, the committee recommends that the Hearing Examiner obtain information and proof of the dedication of this land as a cemetery site. The committee requests : 1 . The Hearing Examiner expedite the remanded hearing; 2 . The Hearing Examiner consider any new information regarding any issue on appeal; 3 . The Hearing Examiner obtain clarification from the present owner and contractor regarding bonds for landscaping, clean up, and rehabilitation; 4 . The Hearing Examiner set requirements for' fencing around the sites for safety and to restrain midnight dumping; and 1 City Council May 9, 1988 Page 2 5 . To set any additional conditions for excavation. The committee found that it was error, although not substantial to support reversal, to impute failures of the prior owner and contractor to the current owner and contractor. This recommendation does not include the first phase of applicant' s project. That phase is not subject to remand. Subject to all of the Hearing Examiner' s conditions and those of the E.R.C. , the applicant ' s request to fill in phase one is affirmed. Inasmuch as there is additional information which should be considered by the Hearing Examiner, the committee recommends that the city council remand this matter to the Hearing Examiner for further hearing on the second phase. DATED: May ! , 1988 Nancy—Mat dws Richard Stredicke -<7- hn Reed A8 . 23 : 20 . `; •Ili 2 CITY OF RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER Earl Clymer, Mayor Fred J. Kaufman June 29, 1988 Anthony Hoare Attorney At Law 1011 Western Avenue Seattle, Washington 98104 RE: Service Corporation of Washington File No. SP-076-87 Dear Mr. Hoare: The Examiner's Report regarding the referenced application which was published June 13 , 1988 has not been appealed within the 14-day period established by ordinance. Therefore, this matter is considered final and is being transmitted to the City Clerk this date for filing. In the Examiner's approval Condition #6 requires that Restrictive Covenants be submitted to the City. This action is to be taken as soon as possible and should be forwarded to the Building Department for their review before filing with King County. Please feel free to contact this office if further assistance or information is required. Sincerely, �- 9. FRED J. KAUFMAN HEARING EXAMINER FJK:dk� cc: ✓City Clerk Building & Zoning Department 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2593 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )ss. County of King ) DOTTY KLINGMAN , being first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and states: That on the 13th day of June , 1g88 , affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this /3 day of .0 U 17, , 1988 �0101*,C:BFF z O ►n4�• \S510N �•�A Mtn Leol'a TA e�.. ,v o� �O...R�• N: *q Notary—Public and for tile State of Washington, ktr puB`�G �: residing at (i l , therein. J,••9 :gyp'►► TqJ . •••• •••� Special Permit 076-87 - SERVICE GROUP OF WASHINGTON Apple AigiN Won, or Case #: P "0" (GREENWOOD CEMETERY) (The minutes contain a list of the parties of record.) ti :=„,„ • NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON. WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON ON JUNE 7 , 1988 , AT 9:00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: SERVICE CORPORATION OF WASHINGTON Remand Hearing for consideration of new information for an application for a special permit for fill and grade to allow the completion of a fill and grade operation at the Greenwood Cemetery Gravel Pit. Property located at 350 Monroe Ave. N.E. ECF-066-87; SP-076-87 E. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Building and Zoning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON JUNE 7, 1988 , AT 9:00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. PUBLISHED : MAY 9)' Mot Ronald G. Nelson Building and Zoning Director CERTIFICATION I, 3 ttR`( F• L I►0P , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT 1i4Ro (3 COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE .CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON OR NEARYBY THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. A �'bed and. sworn to before me, a •Bdbly. Idifor the State of Washington t day.• •c a utiect--V 1 qgT1, 'xv,, • , � SIGNED: G. • -) Q1U V7r4'OF•WPS/id°°' #214 OF R�� : U . o O 0 2,.. IN C) T I IC E • . o9• 17-F0 SEPIse° City, of Renton Land Use Hearing Exam• iner will hold a HEARING • . PUBLIC • . in • CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL •ON .TTINE 7, 1988 BEGINNING AT 9 • o.oA.M. P.M. CONCERNING: I 8 SERVICE CORPORATION OF WASHINGTON I REMAND HEARING FOR CONSIDERATION FO NEW INFORMATION FOR AN APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT. FOR FILL AND GRADE TO ALLOW THE COMPLETION OF A FILL AND GRADE OPERATION AT THE GREENWOOD CEMETERY GRAVEL PIT. v Lj' •�i' 6�1��� ivy✓� I, i. G1 1 — • I I G41 :.. .7' • .R .• 3.• ,t �. FPuo-a <-N- •® / I • ., , f, , j I I • B.R1 ..: I -11 ! II. . • . I.,,,,. I B-1 . i I ,cuo0l ii I ! '• c , i • T ,, — --rI • LL •1,' � r 4 I l I i • .'-.-.1 c' ' G E ENV OD , • ' '' EMEVERY ' .. -r o_, lla3n I' -3 Gil_ I. .0, I • B��S gI__ — I I `- • I I , I T 6u I ; • 'R=2., ?PV®-053-8 . t 4147F4X GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS:. PROPERTY LOCATED AT 350 MONROE. AVENUE N.E.: • • FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION I \ ' June 13, 1988 • OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION APPLICANT: SERVICE GROUP OF WASHINGTON (GREENWOOD CEMETERY) File No.: SP-076-87 LOCATION: 350 Monroe Avenue N.E. • SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Special Permit for grade and fill to allow the extension of an existing permit (SP-048-85) which will allow completion of fill operations and restoration of the site. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Building and Zoning Department Recommendation: Approval with conditions. BUILDING & ZONING The Building & Zoning Department Report was DEPARTMENT REPORT: received by the Examiner on May 31, 1988 PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Building and Zoning Department Report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES The hearing was opened on June 7, 1988 at 10:15 A.M. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit #1 - 5 were entered at hearing of March 1, 1988. Exhibit #6 - Copy of plat map showing all of cemetery property in 1917. Exhibit #7 - Two page document showing dedication of property dated 1986. Exhibit #8 - Affidavit of Dedication (4 pages). Exhibit #9 - Reference Sections of RCW. Exhibit #10 - Letter of March 31, 1988. Exhibit #11 - May 4, 1988 letter from CH2M Hill. Exhibit #12 - Diagrammatic Cross-Section drawing showing water tables and soil conditions on site. • Exhibit #13 - Diagrammatic Cross-Section drawing showing wells and topography of the site.. This hearing was held as a remand from the City Council for presentation of new information prepared for the project. The original hearing before the Hearing Examiner was held on March 1, 1988, with his Decision rendered on March 17, 1988. Mrs. Samek-McKague, Senior Planner, reviewed the background information on this proposal (refer to Decision of 3/17/88) and touched on latest discussions with the applicant. The applicant currently has an annual fill and grade application pending; this hearing is only for Phase II and the question of whether or not there should be further excavation permitted so the project can move forward; the applicant's geotechnical engineer has prepared a report supporting the kinds of fill to be used to ensure the Service Group of Washington SP-076-87 June 13, 1988 Page 2 problems with past fill would not be repeated and corrective measures suggested by said engineer. With this new information the City Council recommended the Hearing Examiner provide a further review of information and other concerns the applicant had objected to in the Examiner's Decision. It was noted the City Council did not modify the conditions or re-use of the site at the appeal and it is assumed those conditions do apply to the phases. Testifying for the applicant was Anthony Hoare. Attorney, 1011 Western Avenue. Seattle, WA. 98104. Mr. Hoare referred to the previous report as pertains to the need for the protection of the aquifer and the water supply for the City of Renton. He stated there was no appeal of any of the conditions imposed by the Examiner as they are felt to be acceptable; the only matter taken exception to was the further excavation of Phase II. He stated the type of material to be used is different but a desirable fill material to be excavated; excavation has been going on pursuant to the previous permit in Phase II. Other concerns were the number of trips per day which now can be round trip fillings between Phase I and II. He continued noting the Council had requested confirmation the property was and had been dedicated as cemetery property prompting the entry and explanation of exhibits 6 - 8; the applicant requests permission to further excavation on the property as it is felt the safeguards attached to the issuance of a permit would protect the aquifer and set out how the activities are conducted such as street cleaning, trips, etc. Another issue to be addressed was the clarification of the bonds for landscaping, clean-up and rehabilitation - as part of the permit application these matters have been identified with a $5,000. bond being provided as well as a landscape rehabilitation bond in an amount 1 and 1/2 times the estimated cost of rehabilitation for which no dollar amount has as yet been established. Also testifying for the applicant was Tom Bekev, 1400 - 140th N.E., Bellevue, WA. 98005 who provided, and reviewed, exhibits 12 and 13 having to do with elevations of the site, well fields in the area and their ground surface elevation; and noted the aquifer tapped by city wells is between elevation 0 and minus 75; reviewed the water on the site, water table and contaminants in the soil which should be able to bio-degrade as there is air available to the water. Mr. Bekey spoke to the quality of soil to be imported to the site for fill. He stated prior to bidding on a project contractors are presented with a copy of a geotechnical report for the project which describes the material available. For the last year or so it has also been a practice to have an environmental audit to determine whether or not there is a risk of soil contamination which helps to determine if there is potentially dangerous materials that need to be excluded"from the site. Continuing in support of the proposal was Nick Horn, John R. Ewing and Associates, 1314 So. Central, Kent, WA. 98032 who stated on the recommendation of the original geotechnical report they proposed a system of an oil/water separator with drain lines fed to the exposed surface; the design for Phase I was a closed system whereas the system designed for Phase II took the surface water from the site and hooked up with a system employed by a development to the east that runs through the cemetery site and ties into the City at N.E. 2nd Street. Both systems seem to be acceptable to the City at this time. Mr. Horn closed stating the applicant has contracted to have a monthly testing of material to be deposited on the site as well as the method of deposit to be sure they meet the requirements of the City. The contractor for this proposal, Bruce Hansen. Boulevard Excavating, P. O. Box 68128, Seattle, WA. 98188 who stated he has an agreement with the current owner and is in no way connected with the previous owners or contractors who have done work on the site, and he is not taking responsibility for past occurrences on the site. He said they are aware of the conditions set by the City and assured the Examiner they will be complied with such as the cleaning of the trucks and streets, with soils being checked and evaluated for contaminates before reaching the site. Planner Samek-McKague advised the Examiner the City Council wanted him to review the fencing requirements for the site for reasons of safety as well as a deterrent to midnight dumping. The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak, and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 11:20 A.M. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The subject matter was originally reviewed by the Hearing Examiner's Office. The application was denied to the extent of permitting further excavation of the subject site, permitting the applicant instead to import fill material to rehabilitate the site for cemetery purposes. The applicant appealed the partial denial to the City Council. The Council remanded the matter back to the Hearing Examiner to take additional testimony and entertain new information, particularly regarding the aquifer recharge area. , Service Group of Washington SP=076-87 June 13, 1988 Page 3 2. Based upon a re-examination of the entire record, and supplemented by additional information, the original decision dated March 17, 1988 is modified to reflect the following additional Findings and Conclusions. This report will not restate those matters of record already concluded in the prior report, although some matters may be restated for clarity. 3. The subject site is the applicant's original Phase II quarry site located along the eastern perimeter of the subject site. The site is immediately north of N.E. 2nd Street and west of Queen Avenue N.E. (128th Avenue S.E. in King County). The King County Renton District Court is located south of the subject site. 4. An existing quarry operation has been conducted on the subject site by prior owners and contractors. The former owners contracted to allow a third party to excavate quarry materials for use on construction sites in the general King County area. A companion site, Phase I, located west of the subject site, was also subjected to a similar agreement. Refilling of both sites was begun under these earlier contracts. Some refilling was apparently done in such a fashion as to jeopardize the integrity of fill layers and potential reuse. Materials which are not legally permitted for filling were occasionally utilized. 5. A new owner and contractor have modified past practices and entered into agreements to assure the integrity of the site and materials utilized to refill the site. 6. The applicant intends to continue excavation of materials down to a level of approximately 317 feet elevation. Current ground elevation in the unexcavated areas adjacent to the pit range from approximately 350 feet to 375 feet. The applicant intends to refill and grade the pit with imported materials to an elevation of approximately 345 to 350 feet. 7. At the bottom of the existing excavation is ponded water. Original reports appeared to indicate that this water represented a breached drinking water aquifer. A concern was that this exposed water was part of the drinking water aquifer of the City of Renton, or an aquifer which feeds the City's aquifer. 8. An old water well which existed on the subject site drew off water from an elevation of 260 feet, which is approximately 57 feet below the proposed bottom of the excavation. The water table serving the site is, therefore, approximately 100 feet below the surface elevation and 57 feet below the pit bottom. 9. The City's wells located in and around Liberty Park and Cedar Park, just east of the Central Business District, draw water from approximately zero (0.00 feet) to approximately minus 75 feet. The surface or ground elevation around the wells is approximately 30 feet. 10. The drinking water wells for the City (elevation approximately 0.00 to -75.00 feet), therefore, feed off of an aquifer below the aquifer utilized by the old well on the cemetery site (elevation 260 feet) and well below the proposed pit bottom (elevation 315 feet). 11. The applicant has accepted the conditions imposed upon Phase I by the Hearing Examiner, the ERC, and the City Council. Geotechnical reports and periodic City inspections have been required. Those conditions remain applicable to the portion of the permit applicable to Phase II of the subject site. 12. The applicant proposes recharging the underlying aquifer with a series of pipes and ditches. Water will be passed through a filter cloth and an oil/water separator. This process will clean silt and contaminants from the water before it percolates back into the ground. 13. The water will enter the ground water system at approximately 250 to 300 ft. above the level at which the City's drinking water is drawn off. The distance the water has to travel both in vertical and horizontal distance should provide protection to the City's aquifer. Service Group of Washington SP-076-87 June 13, 1988 • Page 4 CONCLUSIONS 1. These conclusions adopt the original conclusions of the Hearing Examiner's Report of March 17, 1988 as modified by the conclusions found below regarding further excavation of the Phase II site. 2. The proposed plan to further excavate the site appears reasonable especially since excavation will be coupled with the refilling of the companion parcel to the west. The trucks delivering materials will serve a dual purpose. They will not only deliver materials to the western Phase I site but they will also be used to transport materials excavated from the Phase II site. Although it does not appear that this will be, or can be a one for one correspondence, it should result'in less overall trips than if the operations were completely separate. 3. The record demonstrates that the ponding which has occurred at the bottom of the subject site is not caused by a breach of the drinking water aquifer. A horizontal distance of over a mile separates the subject site from City wells and a vertical distance of approximately 150 feet or more separates the water bearing drinking water aquifer from the subject site. 4. The applicant will take precautions to assure that accumulated ground water is recharged after a cleansing operation. Water will be filtered through a filter fabric to screen out sediments and an oil/water separator will be employed to screen out contaminants. 5. The conditions attached to Phase I remain applicable to the subject site. 6. The City Council recommended that so-called midnight dumping be prevented and this probably should be accomplished by strengthening the security fence around the site. The applicant, therefore, shall reinforce the fence to prevent any unauthorized entry to the site. In addition, in the event it is obvious that prohibited materials have been introduced, the applicant shall be responsible for their removal. This will be easier once the elevation of the pit is raised above the water level. DECISION The Special Permit to Fill and Grade the site is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. All plans for rehabilitation and all progress toward that end, that is, all aspects of the refilling of the subject site, shall be subject to periodic review by the City and its selected consultant or consultants. The City shall be entitled to make reasonable spot checks by entering the site with or without consultants of its choice. 2. This permit shall be issued for not more than two years. 3. The truck trips shall be reasonably apportioned over the two year interval, and all hours of operation shall be subject to review, with the City in its sole discretion permitted to reduce the number of hours, prohibit certain hauling routes and limit the number of days of operation. The hours of operation shall not be lengthened. 4. The applicant shall post a bond in an amount sufficient to assure the survival or replacement of all required perimeter landscaping materials. 5. Unless a certified geotechnical consultant formulates an assured method of filling the site at this time, and said consultant or similar expert certifies that the site has been filled in the prescribed manner and would be suitable for cemetery purposes, Covenants running with the land shall require that prior to reuse of the site for cemetery purposes the applicant shall subject the site to a complete geotechnical survey. 6. A Covenant running with the land and clearly identifying the geotechnical risks shall be required, and said Covenants shall require that any subsequent development withstand scrutiny by further timely geotechnical reporting. 7. The conditions imposed by the ERC shall be conditions of approval Service Group of Washington SP-076-87 June 13, 1988 Page 5 8. The applicant shall reinforce the fence to prevent any unauthorized entry to or dumping on the site. If prohibited materials have been introduced, the applicant shall be responsible for their removal. ORDERED THIS 13th day of June, 1988. 'mil Y.CA4,‘ FRED J. K FMAN HEARING AMINER TRANSMITTED THIS 13th day of June, 1988 to the parties of record: Anthony Hoare Attorney At Law 1011 Western Avenue Seattle, WA. 98104 Tom Bekey 1400 - 140th N.E. Bellevue, WA. 98005 Nick Horn John R. Ewing & Assoc. 1314 So. Central Kent, WA. 98032 Bruce Hansen Boulevard Excavating P. O. Box 68128 Seattle, WA. 98188 TRANSMITTED THIS 13th day of June, 1988 to the following: Mayor Earl Clymer Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator Richard Houghton, Public Works Director Members, Renton Planning Commission Larry M. Springer, Policy Development Director Glen Gordon, Fire Marshal Ronald Nelson, Building & Zoning Director Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney John Adamson, Developmental Program Coordinator Gary Norris, Traffic Engineer Renton Record-Chronicle Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 P.M. June 27, 1988. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of $75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. • I - cow orc;-1cr:3u F�ucuca M j Win- ••=0•C..vo • ....._.. ...,...�x.a �.._„s...e .,m (; I �; ®.c, .--.ems, ,o.._.� ..-o a....>e-....n,.. ._m�; J -;/ t �'• _`� �mo ' y ..a> °" v i ,` V.:. 4—\ iI• IL1\ _ ;± - 1 , I s , i ; , �/J./ ; t.I.•. ce __= _- • .. • 1/ ..,_____ . ...•• mow. �-� 1 4 ' 11 .o- , • -' \/;i - / I' TI.EUCu OCTS.L. • `••-•�•m�, v1›ucL/xL�¢trY Ct10E f •••u I �% t' `\ �i H� i__ - ==J— - .-__�-...:�:� ice = �I i ip o� �_ ._.. - __ - ---,-- Y _ _,I • • ter-...,..�...�,.�``_/ a1�� •. T_.e.�... \.. ... ' - y—��I er— //� ` - _.. i 41�'�� � aM.s.mr..•••••_ ...ma sem. / -� is EC. AA ...r a ._...•..�-..a _ .- PHASE II �• • tirr.,.w w _ rir— JOHN R.E171ta�i•D ASSOCIATES SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL S J. wa.on.�r,..o-t-.,o O+Mr,o.v �,". 'r..rn.� 2 0-0-07 i E MEW. ✓," GREENWOOD CEMETERY i�� eee�fff+��J B we,n,-em xn tw a! DUIOMIO n awg n tnaC.lo 07 •tr... .w.w.u. FILL,GRADE 9 RESTORATION can own pan l 2 S • I , RENTON CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting May 9, 1988 Municipal Building Monday, 7:30 p.m. Council Chambers MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Mayor Earl Clymer led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag and called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order. ROLL CALL OF KATHY KEOLKER-WHEELER, Council President; RICHARD M. COUNCIL MEMBERS STREDICKE, THOMAS W. TRIMM, JOHN W. REED, NANCY L. MATHEWS, TONI NELSON, ROBERT J. HUGHES CITY STAFF IN EARL CLYMER, Mayor; LAWRENCE J. WARREN, Assistant City ATTENDANCE Attorney; MICHAEL W. PARNESS, Administrative Assistant; MAXINE E. MOTOR, City Clerk; RICHARD C. HOUGHTON, Public Works Director; LARRY M. SPRINGER, Policy Development Director; NANCY LASWELL- MORRIS, Senior Planner, Policy Development; JOHN WEBLEY, Parks Director; JOHN MORRIS, Housing & Community Development Coordinator; JOHN ADAMSON, Program Development Coordinator; LT. RAY SAUDE, Police Department. PRESS Kathy Hall, Valley Daily News APPROVAL OF MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL COUNCIL MINUTES APPROVE THE COUNCIL MINUTES OF MAY 2, 1988, AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the Consent Agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. Dangerous Building: Kite, Building and Zoning Department requested fund transfer in the total amount Case #D-144-87 of $3,000 for dangerous building cleanup at 2119 Duvall Avenue N.E., including $500 for pest control. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Claim: Abrehamsen, CL- Claim for damages in the amount of $100.53 filed by Neva Abrehamsen, 433 25-88 Williams Avenue N., for damage to automobile gas tank allegedly caused as a % • result of running over debris in Carco Theatre parking lot. Refer to City Attorney and insurance service. Claim: Brown, CL-24-88 Claim for damages in the amount of $2,410.92 filed by Paul Brown, 10819 • Rainier Avenue S., Seattle, for damage to automobile after striking City • Police vehicle, alleging Police vehicle slid sideways across northbound James Street exit. Refer to City Attorney and insurance service. • Public Works: Federal Public Works/Traffic Engineering Division requested resolution authorizing Funds for Rainier Mayor and City Clerk to execute documents relating to allocation and Avenue South/Airport expenditure of Federal funds for Rainier Avenue South/Airport Way South Way South Improvements safety improvements and Airport pavement rehabilitation. Refer to Ways and and Airport Pavement Means Committee. Citizen Comment: Rogers Letter from Marilyn Rogers, 1709 Jones Drive S.E., opposed construction of - Opposition to New shopping mall proposed by developer David Sabey near Valley Medical Shopping Mall Center due to detrimental impact to downtown Renton and Renton Center and increased traffic congestion. Information. Parks: 1988 H&CD Block Added: Letter from Dagmar and John Toolan, 3406 NE 10th Place, Renton, Grant Program, Good urged retention of R-1 zoning in the surrounding neighborhood. Refer to Shepherd " Official File. Parks: 1988 H&CD Block Added: Letter from Lorraine and Merlin Roberts, 3515 NE 10th Place, Grant Program, Good Renton, opposed location of Good Shephard Group Home in neighborhood Shepherd and rezone from existing R-1 zoning. Refer to Official File. Planning and - Added: Planning and Development Committee Chairman Mathews, presented Development Committee a report regarding the appeal filed by Service Corporation of Washington for Appeal: Service special permit to fill and grade at 350 Monroe Avenue NE, File No. SP-076- Corporation of 87. The Committee found there was new information that should be Washington Special considered by the Hearing Examiner. The Committee recommended that this Permit, SP-076-87 matter be remanded to the•Hearing Examiner on all issues on appeal, with direction to the Hearing Examiner to consider the information included in: May 9, 1988 Renton City Council Minutes Page 151 I) Letter of May 4, 1988, from CH2M Hill; and 2) Letter of March 30, 1988, from Rittenhouse-Zeman and Associates Further, the Committee recommended that the Hearing Examiner obtain information and proof of the dedication of this land as a cemetery site. The Committee requested that the Hearing Examiner: 1) expedite the remanded hearing; 2) consider any new information regarding any issue on appeal; 3) obtain clarification from the present owner and contractor regarding bonds for landscaping, clean up, and rehabilitation; 4) set requirements for fencing around the sites for safety and to restrain midnight dumping; and 5) set any additional conditions for excavation The Committee found that it was error, although not substantial enough to support reversal, to impute failures of the prior owner and contractor to the current owner and contractor. This recommendation does not include the first phase of the applicant's project. That phase is not subject to remand. Subject to all of the Hearing Examiner's conditions and those of the Environmental Review Committee, Ithe applicant's request to fill in phase one is affirmed. Inasmuch as there is additional information which should be considered by the Hearing Examiner, the Committee recommended that the City Council remand this matter to the Hearing Examiner for further hearing on the second phase. Council concur.. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL ADOPT THE CONSENT AGENDA AS AMENDED. CARRIED. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways and Means Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke presented a report Committee recommending the following ordinance for second and final reading: Ordinance #4154 An ordinance of the City of Renton, Washington amending Chapter 11 of Streets: Street Lighting Title 9 (Public Ways and Properties) of City Code by amending Section 9- Ordinance 1108 relating to street lighting standards. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke presented a report recommending the following ordinances for first reading: LID: 334, NE 44th Street An ordinance was read rescinding Ordinance No. 4145 and terminating Local and Lake Washington Improvement District No. 334 due to receipt of protests greater than 60% of Boulevard the anticipated assessments under said LID. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. Annexation: Maplewood An ordinance was read annexing 82.05 acres located east of the existing Golf Course Expansion Renton corporate limits, south of the Cedar River, north of the Maple Valley Highway and the Burlington Northern Railroad right-of-way, and west of 149th Avenue SE to the City of Renton (Maplewood Golf Course expansion). MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke presented a report recommending the following resolutions for reading and adoption: May 9, 1988 PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT TO: City Council FROM: Planning and Development Committee RE: Service Corporation of Washington/SP-076-87/Appeal From Hearing Examiner Decision dated March 17, 1988 The Planning and Development Committee met on May 6, 1988, to consider the Appeal of Service Corporation of Washington. Applicant seeks a special permit to fill and grade at 350 Monroe Avenue N.E. Applicant seeks to remove 142, 000 cubic yards and to fill said site with 295, 000 cubic yards of new fill . The committee found that there was new information that should be considered by the Hearing Examiner. The committee recommends that this matter be remanded to the Hearing Examiner on all issues on appeal, with direction to the Hearing Examiner to consider the information included in: 1 . The letter of May 4, 1988, from CH2M Hill; and 2 . The letter of March 30, 1988, from Rittenhouse-Zeman and Associates . Further, the committee recommends that the Hearing Examiner obtain information and proof of the dedication of this land as a cemetery site. The committee requests : 1. The Hearing Examiner expedite the remanded hearing; 2 . The Hearing Examiner consider any new information regarding any issue on appeal; 3 . The Hearing Examiner obtain clarification from the present owner and contractor regarding bonds for landscaping, clean up, and rehabilitation; 4 . The Hearing Examiner set requirements for fencing around the sites for safety and to restrain midnight dumping; and 1 rn • •y a City Council May 9, 1988 Page 2 5 . To set any additional conditions for excavation. The committee found that it was error,, although not substantial to support reversal, to impute failures of the prior owner and contractor to the current owner and contractor. This recommendation does not include the first phase of applicant' s project. That phase is not subject to remand. Subject to all of the Hearing Examiner' s conditions and those of the E.R.C. , the 'applicant's request to fill in phase one is affirmed. Inasmuch as there is additional information which should be considered by the Hearing Examiner, the committee recommends that the city council remand this matter to the Hearing Examiner for further hearing on the second phase. DATED: May 9 , 1988 IN.ancy-$(at ws f11,,,JAti::, Richard Stredicke --dnn Reed A8.23:20 . • t<• 2 CITY OF RENTON FINANCE DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk April 4, 1988 APPEAL FILED BY J. ANTHONY HOARE, REPRESENTING SERVICE CORPORATION OF WASHINGTON RE: Appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision, dated March 17, 1988, Service Corporation of America Site Approval, SA-076-87 To Parties of Record: Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 30, City Code, written appeal of Hearing Examiner's recommendation has been filed with the City Clerk, along with the proper fee of $75.00. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the written appeal and other pertinent documents will be reviewed by the Council's Planning and Development Committee and will be considered by the City Council when the matter is reported out of Committee. The Council Secretary will notify all parties of record of the date and time of the Planning and Development Committee meeting. If you are not listed in local telephone directories and wish to attend the meeting, please call the Council Secretary at 235-2586 any weekday after 1:00 p.m. for information. Sincerely, CITY OF RENTON • Maxine E. Motor, CMC City Clerk 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2501 • IgAR :3 Tina D I CITY CLEPK'S OFFICE WRITTEN APPEAL OF HEARING EXAMINER' S l �� D DECISION TO RENTON CITY COUNCIL CE E N U\7I APPLICATION NAME: FILE NO. SA-076-87 SERVICE CORPORATION OF WASHINGTON The undersigned, SERVICE CORPORATION OF WASHINGTON, hereby files its Notice of Appeal from the decision of the Land Use Hearing Examiner dated March 17, 1988. . 1. IDENTIFICATION OF PARTY: APPELLANT: SERVICE CORPORATION OF WASHINGTON 350 Monroe Avenue N.E. Renton, Washington (206) 255-1511 • REPRESENTATIVE: J. ANTHONY HOARE, Attorney at Law 900 Waterfront Place 1011 Western Avenue Seattle, Washington 98104 (206) 628-3829 2. SPECIFICATION OF ERRORS: Set forth below are the specific errors of law or fact upon which this Appeal is based: FINDINGS OF FACT: • No. 8 Error: Phase 2 Excavate 7 ,643 trips Fill, if excavated* 10,929 trips Fill, no excavation 3 ,500 trips Correction: The foregoing statement is misleading. There is a very strong demand for , suitable fill and backfill material for both ** public works and private construction projects. The proposed excavation from• Phase 2 would help meet this demand. If excavation is not allowed in Phase 2, the demand will still exist and be met by excavation and hauling from some other location probably within or through the City of Renton. Allowing excavation in Phase 2 will decrease - 1 - LAW OFFICE OF • J. ANTHONY HOARE DOO WATERFRONT PLACE 1011 WCSTCRN AVENUE SEATTLE WASHINGTON 00104 • I2O6)620•3029 • rather than increase the number of hauling trips on Renton streets as many trips can be combined. A truck dumping fill can be loaded with excavated material combining both functions without the necessity of traveling to some other site for excavated materials. This would reduce substantially the number of miles the trucks would otherwise travel on Renton City streets. No. 10 Error: "This area serves the City as •a primary source of drinking water." Correction: This area is many miles removed from the City's source of drinking water, and studies reveal that this area does not in fact contribute any water to the City's supply. See the Engineer' s letter attached. No. 11 Error: "Both pits cut into the aquifer, and what appears to be ponded or impounded water at the bottom of the pits is actually an exposed portion of the underground aquifer." Correction: See the first long paragraph of Minutes on page 1 of the Hearing Examiner' s Report wherein it is noted that in the report by Senior Planner Jenette Samek-McKague that further excavation will not meet the aquifer level. Also • • see the attached report of the Engineer. The water that was observed as being "ponded" or "impounded" is not the water level or water table of the aquifer, but rather is water resting on an impermeable substance exposed by the excavation. No. 12 Error: " . . .anything placed in the pit will at this time have immediate access to the aquifer without benefit of any filtration." Correction: An aquifer is, by dictionary definition, a "water-bearing stratum of permeable rock, sand or gravel." All water entering a semi- permeable stratum will be filtered prior_ to . reaching the water table or water level of the aquifer and then continue to •be filtered by passage through the sand or gravel or permeable rock until it arrives at the point from which the water is drawn. No. 16 Error: "Straw bales will be used to prevent siltation of the exposed ground water." - 2 - LAw orricE or J. ANTHONY HOARE 900 WATERFRONT PLACE •• IOII WESTERN AVENUE SEATTLE WASHINGTON 06104 • CLO61 620.3529 Correction: As noted above, the standing water is surface water and is not an exposure of the water table or water level existing within the aquifer. CONCLUSIONS: No. 1 Error: ". . .to protect the exposed aquifer." Correction: As indicated previously, the water table or water level existing within the aquifer • is not exposed. No. 2 Error: ". . .excavation breached any barrier between the aquifer." Correction: The water table or water level of the aquifer is not exposed nor has it been breached. if the term "aquifer" also includes the permeable stratum above the water table or water level of the aquifer, there is natural filtration of water prior to arriving at the water table or water level, and then continuing throughout the entire movement of the water from the point at which it reaches the water table or water level of the aquifer to the point at which it is drawn, it is continuously filtered by passage through sand, • gravel or permeable rock. No. 2 Error: " . . .apparently little effort was made to control what occurred at the two sites by way of both filling and illegal dumping. " Correction: At the time the most recent permits were issued, the cemetery property was owned by an individual who contracted with a contractor who was responsible for obtaining the permits and conducting the excavation and refilling. In late December, 1987, the individual owner of the cemetery sold the cemetery property to the applicant, which is a substantial national company with its stock actively traded on the New York , Stock Exchange and whose primary business is the ownership and operation of cemeteries. Within weeks after acquiring the cemetery, the new owner contracted with a geotechnical engineering concern to investigate the excavation and refilling activities; the report was prepared and submitted to the City. Also, immediately upon engaging the geotechnical engineer, the contractor was advised - 3 - . LAw orrice or J. ANTHONY HOARE • 900 WATCRrRONT PLACC • 1011 WCSTCRN AVENUE SCATTLC WASHINGTON 00104 ILO0)520•30Z0 • to discontinue further operations until the report was concluded. Subsequent to April, 1987, there has been very little activity either with regard to refilling or excavating. The presence of discarded tires is not evidence of disregard for the filling permit as such tires were not discarded either by the prior contractor, the owner or the present contractor. The discarded tires are believed to be the result of illegal and unauthorized "midnight" dumping operations. The discarded tires can and will be quickly and easily_ removed when activity with regard to filling or further excavation commences. No. 3, 4 Error: References again made to the "exposed aquifer" . Correction: This error has been previously noted with regard to preceding paragraphs. No. 4(2) Error: " . . .would ultimately increase the quantity of imported materials thereby increasing the risk of importation of contaminated materials." Correction: Extensive safeguards have been required by the Environmental Review Committee including regular monitoring of all materials placed in the excavated area. In addition, the • design of the system includes many built-in protective measures. These requirements have not been objected to by the applicant. No. 7 Error: "Large quantities of organic materials, wood and oversized materials have been placed in the site under previous .fill permits and apparently voids have been created. " Correction: The geotechnical engineers' report did note that some quantities of organic materials and some wood and oversized material had been placed on the site but did not indicate that such quantities were "large" . With regard to the :. • placement of materials and . "voids" , the • geotechnical engineer has specified a means, which specifications have been ' incorporated in the agreement with the contractor, to minimize or eliminate voids and substantial settling. No. 8 Error: "While current plans call for cemetery expansion, nothing would prevent the sale of the • - 4 - LAW orrlcE or J. ANTHONY HOARE 900 wATCarRONT PLACE 1011 WESTERN AVENUE SCATTLE.WASHINGTON 90104 IL061 6Z0•3029 acreage to other parties for other purposes-- purposes for which the site might not be fit. " Correction: The entire area for which the previous permits were granted and for which this application is pending is dedicated cemetery land, and, pursuant to R.C.W. 68.24.040 can only be used for cemetery purposes. 3. SUMMARY OF ACTION REQUESTED: The Renton City Council is requested to grant the following relief: Modify the decision of the Hearing Examiner as follows: Allow continued and further excavation as applied for in Phase 2 subject to the terms and conditions of the Environmental Review Committee and the mitigating and protective measures set forth in the Application which have been reviewed by and worked out with the City Engineers. It is further submitted that the granting of a permit subject to extensive and well-reasoned terms and conditions does not give license to violate the terms and conditions of the permit. Recourse for violation of the permit is available through fines, penalties, termination , of the permit and removal or elimination of conditions, such as • improper fill, which are in violation of the permit. Previous permits were granted without such exhaustive review and conditions and without the benefit of such substantial engineering review and technical requirements being imposed. The applicant has assisted in providing engineering studies and working drawings for control measures. The applicant does not object to the recommendations of the Environmental Review Committee and the Building and Zoning Department recommendations. It is essential to this project, however, that further excavation be permitted to allow for an economically viable refilling already excavated areas. DATED this e/ day of March, 1988. Res tfu submitted, G J. nthony Hoare At orney for Service Corporation of Washington, Applicant - 5 - LAW OFFICE or J. ANTHONY HOARE DOO WATCRrRONT PLACE • 1011 WCSTCRN AVENUC SEATTLE WASHINGTON 9810• LLOGI528.3020 SUMMARY OF APPEAL ISSUES File No. SA-076-87 SERVICE CORPORATION OF WASHINGTON, Appellant A) The water table or water level of the aquifer has not been breached or exposed. B) Further excavation will not reach the water level of the aquifer. C) Significant mitigating and protective measures have been designed to reduce or eliminate any significant risk to public health, safety or welfare. D) The aquifer where the excavation is to take place does not serve any domestic or City water sources. E) There is a high demand for quality backfill material for both private and public works projects. F) Allowing further excavation will have the positive result of reducing the number of truck miles traveled on Renton city streets. • • • - 6 - LAW ornct or • J. ANTHONY HOARE 900 WATCRfRONT PLACC 1011 WtSTCRN AVENUC SCATTLC WASHINGTON P0104 • 12OS)520.3020 RZA . �, RITTENHOUSE-ZEMAN&ASSOCIATES, INC. Geotechnical&Hydrogeological Consultants 1400 140th Avenue N.E. 11111111 Bellevue, fKaoshington 98005 (206)746-8020 31 March 1988 W-5176-1 City of Renton City Council Municipal Building Renton, Washington 98055 Subject: Plan's Examiner Review Comments Service Corporation of Washington File No. SA-076-87 Gentlemen: We are writing this letter to discuss the hearing examiner's findings relative to Service Corporation of Washington's permit application to continue excavation and filling operations at the Greenwood Cemetery site in Renton, Washington. This letter addresses general geotechnical considerations of the hearing examiner's findings, conclusions and decision rendered on 17 March 1988 decision provided to us. Service Corporation of Washington has applied to continue to excavate sand from an existing borrow pit on the east margin of the cemetery complex. At the time of our last site visit, the soils exposed in the pit consisted predominantly of clean, fine to medium sands. The east pit was initially planned to extend elevation 317 feet, some 30 to 40 feet below the previous existing site grades in the area. The clean, fine sand in the easternmost pit and the gravelly sand previously excavated in westerly Phase I pit, are interpreted to be glacial recessional deposits of the Vashon Stade of the Fraser Glaciation. This interpretation is confirmed by surficial geologic mapping provided by Luzier in the State of Washington/USGS Water Resources Division Water Supply Bulleting No. 28. That publication, entitled "Geology and Groundwater Resources of the Southwestern King Service Corporation of Washington W-5176 31 March 1988 Page 2 County, Washington", provides a discussion of groundwater resources and geologic conditions, together with well logs in the Renton area. Classification of the upper sands is further substantiated by exposures of "hard pan" or glacial till at the bottom of the western Phase I excavation, near elevation 315. This till material is found stratigraphically below the glacial recessional soils. The log of an on-site well indicates some 57 feet on nonsaturated soils below the ground surface elevation. The well is reportedly located at an intermediate location between the two excavation phases. This depth or a similar thickness of nonsaturated soils should likewise be expected in the easternmost Phase II pit area as was encountered in Phase I. We understand and concur with the concerns of the hearing examiner with respect to protecting the future integrity of the aquifer from the City is presently obtaining its municipal water supplies west of the site. However, we offer the following data which indicates to us that the aquifer supply for the City is hydraulically separated from the "perched" groundwater conditions present above the glacial till which is a relatively impermeable aquiclude present at depth below this site. 1. The City of Renton well field is in a highly productive aquifer, the horizontal limits of which are defined by a glacially carved bedrock channel of the Cedar River. The relative, location of the cemetery and the municpal well field are shown on Figure 1 attached with this letter. 2. The ci-ty wells are located near I-405 and are screened at depths 35 to 105 feet below the well field ground surface elevation near elevation 30 feet. This aquifer level is some 300 feet vertically in elevation below the ground surface elevation at the proposed pit bottom. 3. The surface water to be infiltrated on site as part of the- final configuration is to be cleaned through sedimentation chambers and oil-water separators. This pretreatment of site surface water is intended to protect the future integrity of the local groundwater regime. Service Corporation of Washington W-5176 31 March 1988 Page 3 4. The existing perched groundwater present at the site is interpreted to be the result of the presence of the glacial till aquiclude, which is of very low permeability and serves to impede vertical groundwater movement except at exceptionally low or negligible rates. 5. Off-site migration of groundwater, if any, would therefore be horizontal rather than vertical . The horizontal distance separating the site from the Renton well fields is more than one mile. Contrary to the hearing examiners findings, such horizontal movement would allow for percolation and filtration by the normal subsurface constituents, such as soils, gravel and sands, in our opinion. 6. Previous studies by others, (Brown and Randall CH2M-Hill , 1987) have rated the overall significance of "cemetery sites" as potential contaminant sources in the City water supply to be "low", even though the probability of occurrence was rated to be "high". This finding is attributed to be the result of the hydraulic separation between the upper perched groundwater levels and the Cedar River aquifer afforded by the relatively impermeable glacial till soils and bedrock. In summary, the aquifer protection which the hearing examiner believes would be afforded by cessation of excavation recommended in the findings would be negligible, in our opinion, as the potential for communication between groundwater leaving the site, if any, in the municipal well fields is low, in our opinion. We understand Service Corporation of Washington has recently negotiated a new contract with an excavating company to continue excavation of site soils and backfill the existing pits. We have previously outlined geotechnical performance specifications so as to complete this operation to provide suitable conditions for cemetery use once the backfilling has occurred. We concur with the hearing examiners findings that import fill materials be screened so as to exclude specific prohibited materials from the backfill . We have been contacted by Mr. Bob Anderson of Service Service Corporation of Washington W-5176 31 March 1988 Page 4 Corporation of Washington, who has requested that Rittenhouse-Zeman & Associates perform intermittent periodic observation of the contractor's operations so as to document backfilling of the borrow pits. Such control would also allow for screening of import fill soils so as to reduce the potential of incorporation of potential contaminants in the fill mass. The hearing examiner is also concerned with respect to future covenants on the subject property. We would be pleased to discuss potential remediation efforts or modifications of contractor's operations so as to allow alternate site useage of the project site, if so desired. In our opinion, enough fill remains to be placed in the, Phase I excavation so as to allow adequate modification of fill placement operations to incorporate desired cemetery uses of this parcel in the future. We trust this letter is sufficient for your present needs. Should you have any questions regarding this letter or other topics, please feel free to call at your earliest convenience. Respectfully submitted, RITTENHOUSE-ZEMAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. • GROeNt a' 4k, o WASHIN %.,#p /* 'S` clod: Kurt W. Groesch, P.E. ti -:,� •�, Associate .off •. 09.: _ o '•.!�EGISZE.• *V • • PREPARED IN COOPERATIO'_ ''KITH THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY • • R.5 E. - Oar=ti.'ti' ` v "'1 r. • I' �. ';;94.,__. �\ ,1 \t' �,it:.`= '"<.. ail. 0rj/,' �• _ \ N ` �i �`* \�\ all' �' 4.°1 Qu }'-1"'•t c1' T--- ;f, '\ OD i'• ' ; i '- \`",,,,s w : OP ' ,v • ' (�� \.,, lam./.e•, Ni....'Iii"•QV :`-, lk9J •t .1 .-P- • ;�.l�',. •'��.\���• '`ram er-. w'.:.;�r: QVf G/ 8 Q: --_':%.t�j, .µ^ Y-.9 u'3'ip�J. •i ?t4 :• i 'a 11 ` '' l,`••1 t'�' ^, t 1� '�' � t .\ 7' 11 yt`1 •.t-'- i \ • Ale t]b'.'- �•1,.��'e%e: - {"t rapt 1 .. :'\•:i 1�•`t I 1 ''��\;•. .lily: �''/ (—���"T •.QVf-. y.��.:r•' ~F. '" •/:._:.. .t' ^� ` ^`�' 1. \ ix. :„„7....„:„„,,,&...N.T........• :. \,,:,. \..,:„...„1.... ,•1\ !. i , ...,2:.,..7...,.,,,,„..„ , ...j.„ ,_,..,.:, . ii•.,•'• • • ., , ..... ,0 :.:. . \.1., 1}s:. v. •-'- .Qvt t '1.!... •. `1\••°:.:15'• '\0.-% _ ,1^„/-\'`•...„a\ , )\ l` '\,. c,... .., ..,. .S._. ,2v--•r, .fir= •r , ,.: ` `c •fs ' ''' \ • `• 1. .4: ,. .VA... fi •Ye t, Tw -:Qvr� •r• `0�'; 11�rQ� `•1:"'y�s''-': � �,•.r~ . ��'1•�2 `•U . , i 1 Z j �QY.''• • — e� y�-... _ -P. • '�� �'nrn - sue a8°'Ow; ' ,�"' :: • \ G TT1t° • . � - 'yvt4 + t \ � .- r ': _ .y. �. - �` ` / • . ' - t � •Vr� 1 ` ^J a.: 7. • \ca`\. ' • =QVi j - a _ -.Qvi ,: • \. ov ! =- : -OvY _ •. r / \ (may • • '',Yti \a•- a y,:. �7.. !;;......;ip ••. % \ 4 ;•.•;:•4177".16,. • • ' coK :.�•+`` ,3Q. f• 1.. •'' + ' W ` . ` ,. �. . ...4 ' -' C 28 i n .7 .. ;.. ./ '!. . V t ,,2`• : . :\. ` ' ' am4 ,r - 0T �_G- c 1_, of • •t4`_a� /�1 "- -- .. _1•• lip ''17,Vii ...:R"-' • • ` �s ' . !• -t :: a � l . •Vwtj 36, './ r, I• QVtj r ' ,-• .tl^u V tir\\ "s. .� P s �/ 3'-:-. i• : '. i '',' --,.. % *-9:,.. •••-f .- •-• *--kl._::•••;- ', ';;Z:t:ItakL;-'%.:.: , Figure 1 Vicinity Map Service Corporation of Washington W-5176-1 RITTENHOUSE-ZEMAN& RZA W.O. &ASSOCIATES, INC. • BY KWG Geotechnical&Hydrogeological I Niiii:Hg". DATE Consultants 1400 140th Avenue N.E. ondikhonik SCALE 1" = 4000' Bellevue, WA 98005 moillaimm RENTON CITY COUNCIL Abbreviated Meeting April 11, 1988 Municipal'Building Monday, 7:30 p.m. Council Chambers MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Mayor Earl Clymer led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag.and called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order. ROLL CALL OF ROBERT J. HUGHES, NANCY L. MATHEWS, JOHN W. REED, THOMAS COUNCIL MEMBERS W. TRIMM, RICHARD M. STREDICKE. MOVED BY HUGHES, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, ABSENT COUNCIL MEMBERS KATHY KEOLKER-WHEELER AND TONI NELSON BE EXCUSED. CARRIED. CITY STAFF IN EARL CLYMER, Mayor; LAWRENCE J. WARREN, City Attorney; ATTENDANCE MICHAEL W. PARNESS, Administrative Assistant; MAXINE E. MOTOR, City Clerk PRESS Kathy Hall, Valley Daily News APPROVAL OF MOVED BY HUGHES, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL APPROVE COUNCIL MINUTES THE COUNCIL MINUTES OF APRIL 11, 1988, AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the Consent Agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. At Council request, Consent Agenda Item 4.e. regarding Honey Creek PPUD was removed for separate consideration. Condemnation: Oakesdale City Attorney requested ordinance to commence condemnation proceedings to Avenue (Bitney Property) acquire right-of-way for Oakesdale Avenue, I-405 to SW 16th Street, Bitney property. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. (See later action.) Annexation: North Soos City Clerk submitted petitions containing 86 signatures from residents of Creek (Fairwood) Lake Desire area and 31• signatures from Fairwood-Soos Creek area opposing inclusion of the area in Soos Creek Annexation boundaries. Refer to Community Services Committee. Utility: Code Revision for Finance Department requested ordinance clarifying City Code Section Mandatory Connection to 8-702(d) and 8-703(5) to resolve conflict in requirements regarding Sewers mandatory connection to sewers. Refer to Utilities Committee. Streets: CBD Decorative Community Services Committee concurred with Public Works Department Lighting recommendation to remove Central Business District decorative lighting and revise Main Street lighting in two to three year phasing program, and requested staff to submit funding as part of 1989 budget. Council concur. Streets: Street Lighting Community Services Committee requested preparation of Street Lighting Ordinance Ordinance to define street lighting. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Streets: Street Lighting Community Services Committee recommended concurrence in Street Lighting Curtailment Program Curtailment Program to curtail street lighting in the event of energy shortage. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. , Appeal; Service Appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision filed regarding Service Corporation of Corporation of America America Special Permit, SP-076-87, for fill and grade at 350 Monroe Avenue Special Permit. SP-076-87 NE. Refer to Planning and Development Committee. MOVED BY HUGHES, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL ADOPT THE CONSENT AGENDA AS AMENDED. CARRIED. Removed Item: Letter was read from Michael M. Hanis, 3900 East Valley Highway, Renton, PUD: Preliminary, Honey attorney for Mitch Murray, requested that appeal period for the Honey Creek Creek, PPUD-015-84, PPUD be reopened for the limited purpose of determining right-of-way and Condemnation road improvement conditions for NE 23rd Street, Honey Creek PPUD-015- 84. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL REFER LETTER TO ADMINISTRATION SO LEGAL DEPARTMENT CAN RESPOND TO LETTER. (It was noted that appeal challenging the PUD Ordinance should be filed with King County Superior Court rather than City Council.) CARRIED. (See later action.) Ydd f 410 •i CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director April 11, 1988 Boulevard Excavating, Inc. 11065 Pacific Hwy.S . P.O. Box 68128 Seattle, WA 98188 Attn: James Donovan SUBJECT: FILLING PHASE I, SP-076-87 Dear Mr. Donovan: Your request of April 6, 1988 to separate the two pits on the Service Corporation fill application was reviewed and the finding is that the application is all one project. The appeal affects the total site, both pits, and work should not commence until the appeal is complete. Sincerely, 1 y Ronald . Nelson Building & Zoning Director RGN:plp blvdexca 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 J ±. CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER Earl Clymer, Mayor Fred J. Kaufman April 7, 1988 Ron Nelson, Director, Building and Zoning City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA. 98055 RE: Your Memo of April 7, 1988 Service Corporation Appeal - -076-87 Dear Ron: I have reviewed your memo of April 7, 1988 regarding the above entitled matter. There was no separation of phases in the review process, other than to review the requirements for the two sites. The entire site, both phases, would therefore be subject to the hold created by the appeal. The decision on the phases was not separated by this office and cannot be at this stage. Additionally, it would appear that the applicant raised issues regarding the geotechnical requirements, and this was required of the entire project. In conclusion, only one Special Permit was applied for by the applicant and that permit has been appealed. No aspect is final until the appeal is settled. This office believes the file designation should be Special Permit 076-87 and not SA (Site Approval) 076-87 as shown on the staff 'report. Please confirm. If this office can be of any further assistance, please feel free to call. Sincerely, -4=3 FRED J. FMAN CM C Pmmrem HEARING EXAMINER FJK/dk eR. it tee 0 CITY CLEPK g OfFla 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2593 ti CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director MEMORANDUM DATE: April 7, 1988 TO: Fred Kaufman, Hearing Examiner FROM: Ron Nelson, Building & Zoning Director RE: SERVICE CORPORATION APPEAL Is the appeal which you received from Service Corporation only for Phase II? Attached is a request I received from Boulevard Excavating, Inc. so I need your response before responding. Thanks /-67 RGN:plp 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 B LEVARD- EXCAVAT1N; , INC. A- 11065 PACIFIC HWY. S. "„'�` ' "/{Tr , d • 9.. P. O. BOX 68128 % 3 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98188 r 762-0650 . • CITY OF ENTON April 6 , 1988 R APR 61998 . City Of Renton Building & Zoning Department BUILDING ZONING DEPT. Attn : Ronald Nelson RE : Filling Phase I Dear Mr . Nelson I would like to submit for a request to fill Phase I as described in the Hearing Examiners Report dated March 17 , 1988 . Service Corporation of Washington has filed for an appeal on Phase II , not Phase I so we would like to continue our filling operation on Phase I in accordiance with the Hearing Examiner ' s findings . Than You : ,..7.1„,,,---XZ„...-----_ James Donovan Estimator • cc : JD •• 7J o76 -.� 7 BO__._4„EVARD EXCAVATING, I NC. 11065 PACIFIC HWY. S. i� tt P. 0. BOX 68128 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98188 762-0650 CITY OF RENTON April 6 , 1988 D c� © E V � . APR 619B8 / City Of Renton Building & Zoning Department BUILDING l ZONING DEPT. Attn : Ronald Nelson RE: Filling Phase I Dear Mr . Nelson I would like to submit for a request to fill Phase I as described in the Hearing Examiners Report dated March 17 , 1988 . Service Corporation of Washington has filed for an appeal on Phase II , not Phase I so we would like to continue our filling operation on Phase I in accordiance with the Hearing Examiner ' s findings . Than You : -7/ -"/" • James Donovan Estimator • • • c c : J D ---.� %• 0 CITY OF RENTON ..1 HEARING EXAMINER Earl Clymer, Mayor Fred J. Kaufman April 7, 1988 Ron Nelson, Director, Building and Zoning City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA. 98055 RE: Your Memo of April 7, 1988 Service Corporation Appeal - SA-076-87 Dear Ron: I have reviewed your memo of April 7, 1988 regarding the above entitled matter. There was no separation of phases in the review process, other than to review the requirements for the two sites. The entire site,., both phases, would therefore be subject to the hold created by the appeal. The decision on the phases was not separated by this office and cannot be at this stage. Additionally, it would appear that the applicant raised issues regarding the geotechnical requirements, and this was required of the entire project. In conclusion, only one Special Permit was applied for by the applicant and that permit has been appealed. No aspect is final until the appeal is settled. This office ibelieves the file designation should be Special Permit 076-87 and not SA (Site Approval) 076-87 as shown on the staff report. Please confirm. If this office can be of any further assistance, please feel free to call. Sincerely, FRED J. KAtFMAN Cps OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RECE " Enn FJK/dk APR 8 1988 BUILDING /ZONING DEPT. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2593 CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI #: SUBMITTING DATA: FOR AGENDA,OF: - l/ Dept/Div/Board.. City Clerk Staff Contact.. M. Motor AGENDA STATUS: Consent XX SUBJECT: Appeal of Hearing Examiner's Decision on Public Hearing.. Service Corporation of America'Sitc a14 Correspondence.. A--Np l, -076-87 Ordinance 1 eILi"5P Resolution Old Business.... EXHIBITS: City Clerk's letter New Business.... Letter of Appeal Study Session... Hearing Examiner's Report, 3/17/88 Other RECOMMENDED ACTION: I APPROVALS: Refer to Planning and Development Committee I Legal Dept I Finance Dept.... I Other FISCAL IMPACT: Expenditure Required... Transfe /Amendment.. Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated... SUMMARY OF ACTION: Appeal filed by J. Anthony Hoare, representing Service Corporation of Washington, accompanied by required fee received on March 31, 1988. a 0 CITY OF RENTON FINANCE DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk April 4, 1988 APPEAL FILED BY J. ANTHONY HOARE, REPRESENTING SERVICE CORPORATION OF WASHINGTON RE: Appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision, dated March 17, 1988, Service Corporation of America Site Approval, SA-076-87 To Parties of Record: Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 30, City Code, written appeal of Hearing Examiner's recommendation has been filed with the City Clerk, along with the proper fee of $75.00. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the written appeal and other pertinent documents will be reviewed by the Council's Planning and Development Committee and will be considered by the City Council when the matter is reported out of Committee. The Council Secretary will notify all parties of record of the date and time of the Planning and Development Committee meeting. If you are not listed in local telephone directories and wish to attend the meeting, please call the Council Secretary at 235-2586 any weekday after 1:00 p.m. for information. Sincerely, CITY OF RENTON Maxine E. Motor, CMC City Clerk 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2501 CITY OF RENTON "LL FINANCE DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk April 5, 1988 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON) • ss COUNTY OF KING ) MARILYN J. PETERSEN, Deputy City Clerk for the City of Renton, being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says that she is a citizen of the United States and a resident of the State of Washington, over the age of 21 and not a party to nor interested in this matter. That on the 5th day of April, 1988, at the hour of 5:00 p.m., your affiant duly mailed and placed in the United States Post Office at Renton, King County, Washington, by first class mail to all parties of record, notice of appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision filed by J. Anthony Hoare, attorney for Service Corporation of America, File No. SA-076-87. ?-i)///tit( ril)66:6 -S-LIA Marilyn J. P rs&r ,, Deputy City Clerk SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE me this 5th day of April, 1988. Notary Public in and for t State of Washington, residing in 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2501 CITY OF RENTOIN N0 25950 FINANCE DEPARTMENT RENTON, WASHINGTON 9 55 3- c/ 19 0 RECEIVED OF (f11-47- Gih�J A.91,20_rd J,..,e.c. .75_ _____, �_/ TOTAL TI . by = J CITY' or NAR :33`1988 rCM CLERK'S OFFICE. WRITTEN APPEAL OF HEARING EXAMINER'S D l J DECISION TO RENTON CITY COUNCIL (sE[ 0\VEL APPLICATION NAME: FILE NO. SA-076-87 �y SERVICE CORPORATION OF WASHINGTON The undersigned, SERVICE CORPORATION OF WASHINGTON, hereby files its Notice of Appeal from the decision of the Land Use Hearing Examiner dated March 17 , 1988. . 1. IDENTIFICATION OF PARTY: APPELLANT: SERVICE CORPORATION OF WASHINGTON 350 Monroe Avenue N.E. Renton, Washington ( 206) 255-1511 REPRESENTATIVE: J. ANTHONY HOARE, Attorney at Law 900 Waterfront Place 1011 Western Avenue Seattle, Washington 98104 ( 206 ) 628-3829 • 2. SPECIFICATION OF ERRORS: Set forth below are the specific errors of law or fact upon which this Appeal is based: FINDINGS OF FACT: • No. 8 Error: Phase 2 Excavate 7 ,643 trips Fill, if excavated. 10,929 trips. Fill, no excavation 3 ,500 trips Correction: The foregoing statement is misleading. There is a very strong demand for , suitable fill and backfill material for both''' public works and private construction projects. The proposed excavation from Phase 2 would help meet this demand. If excavation is not allowed in Phase 2, the demand will still exist and be met by excavation and hauling from some other location probably within or through the City of Renton. Allowing excavation in Phase 2 will decrease - 1 - LAW OFFICE OF J. ANTHONY HOARE ' 900 WATERFRONT PLACE • 1011 WESTERN AVENUE SEATTLE WASHINGTON 90104 • Ii06)606.3029 rather than increase the number of hauling trips on Renton streets as many trips can be combined. A truck dumping fill can be loaded with excavated material combining both functions without the necessity of traveling to some other site for excavated materials. This would reduce substantially the number of miles the trucks would otherwise travel on Renton City streets. No. 10 Error: "This area serves the City as a primary source of drinking water. " Correction: This area is many miles removed from the City' s source of drinking water, and studies reveal that this area does not in fact contribute any water to the City' s supply. See the Engineer' s letter attached. No. 11 Error: "Both pits cut into the aquifer, and what appears to be ponded or impounded water at the bottom of the pits is actually an exposed portion of the underground aquifer. " Correction: See the first long paragraph of Minutes on page 1 of the Hearing Examiner' s Report wherein it is noted that in the report by Senior Planner Jenette Samek-McKague that further excavation will not meet the aquifer level. Also • see the attached report of the Engineer. The water that was observed as being "ponded" or "impounded" is not the water level or water table of the aquifer, but rather is water resting on an impermeable substance exposed by the excavation. No. 12 Error: " . . .anything placed in the pit will at this time have immediate access to the aquifer without benefit of any filtration. " Correction: An aquifer is, by dictionary definition, a "water-bearing stratum of permeable rock, sand or gravel. " All water entering a semi- permeable stratum will be filtered prior to reaching the water table or water level of the aquifer and then continue to •be filtered by passage through the sand or gravel or permeable rock until it arrives at the point from which the water is drawn. No. 16 Error: "Straw bales will be used to prevent siltation of the exposed ground water. " - 2 - LAW OFFICE OF ' J. ANTHONY HOARE • AGO WATCRFRONT PLACE • 1011 WESTERN AVENUE SEATTLE.WASHINGTON 901O4 1206)620•3529 Correction: As noted above, the standing water is surface water and is not an exposure of the water table or water level existing within the aquifer. CONCLUSIONS: No. 1 Error: " . . .to protect the exposed aquifer. " Correction: As indicated previously, the water table or water level existing within the aquifer is not exposed. No. 2 Error: " . . .excavation breached any barrier between the aquifer. " Correction: The water table or water level of the aquifer is not exposed nor has it been breached. If the term "aquifer" also includes the permeable stratum above the water table or water level of the aquifer, there is natural filtration of water prior to arriving at the water table or water level, and then continuing throughout the entire movement of the water from the point at which it reaches the water table or water level of the aquifer to the point at which it is drawn, it is continuously filtered by passage through sand, gravel or permeable rock. No. 2 Error: " . . .apparently little effort was made to control what occurred at the two sites by way of both filling and illegal dumping. " Correction: At the time the most recent permits were issued, the cemetery property was owned by an individual who contracted with a contractor who was responsible for obtaining the permits and conducting the excavation and refilling. In late December, 1987 , the individual owner of the cemetery sold the cemetery , property to the applicant, which is a substantial national company with its stock actively traded on the New York Stock Exchange and whose primary business is the ownership and operation of cemeteries. Within weeks after acquiring the cemetery, the new owner contracted with a geotechnical engineering concern to investigate the excavation and refilling activities; the report was prepared and submitted to the City. Also, immediately upon engaging the geotechnical engineer, the contractor was advised - 3 - . • LAW OFFICC OF J. ANTHONY HOARE • 9OO WATERFRONT PLACE 1011 WESTERN AVENUE SEATTLE.WASHINGTON 98104 ILO6)626•3829 to discontinue further operations until the report was concluded. Subsequent to April, 1987, there has been very little activity either with regard to refilling or excavating. The presence of discarded tires is not evidence of disregard for the filling permit as such tires were not discarded either by the prior contractor, the owner or the present contractor. The discarded tires are believed to be the result of illegal and unauthorized "midnight" dumping operations. The discarded tires can and will be quickly and easily removed when activity with regard to filling or further excavation commences. No. 3, 4 Error: References again made to the "exposed aquifer" . Correction: This error has been previously noted with regard to preceding paragraphs. No. 4(2) Error: " . . .would ultimately increase the quantity of imported materials thereby increasing the risk • of importation of contaminated materials. " Correction: Extensive safeguards have been required by the Environmental Review Committee including regular monitoring of all materials placed in the excavated area. In addition, the • design of the system includes many built-in protective measures. These requirements have not been objected to by the applicant. No. 7 Error: "Large quantities of organic materials, wood and oversized materials have been placed in the site under previous . fill permits and apparently voids have been created. " Correction: The geotechnical engineers ' report did note that some quantities of organic materials and some wood and oversized material had been placed on the site but did not indicate that such quantities were "large" . With regard to the :. • placement of materials and . "voids" , the geotechnical engineer has specified a means, which specifications have been ' incorporated in the agreement with the contractor, to minimize or eliminate voids and substantial settling. No. 8 Error: "While current plans call for cemetery expansion, nothing would prevent the sale of the - 4 - LAW OFFICE OF J. ANTHONY HOARE .0OO WATERFRONT PLACC 1011 WESTERN AVENUE SCATTLC WASHINGTON 90104 1206)6Z0•315Z9 a acreage to other parties for other purposes-- purposes for which the site might not be fit. " Correction: The entire area for which the previous permits were granted and for which this application is pending is dedicated cemetery land, and, pursuant to R.C.W. 68 . 24. 040 can only be used for cemetery purposes. 3 . SUMMARY OF ACTION REQUESTED: • The Renton City Council is requested to grant the following relief: Modify the decision of the Hearing Examiner as follows: Allow continued and further excavation as applied for in Phase 2 subject to the terms and conditions of the Environmental Review Committee and the mitigating and protective measures set forth in the Application which have been reviewed by and worked out with the City Engineers. . It is further submitted that the granting of a permit subject to extensive and well-reasoned terms and conditions does not give license to violate the terms and conditions of the permit. Recourse for violation of the permit is available through fines, penalties, termination , of the permit and removal or elimination of conditions, such as • improper fill, which are in violation of the permit. Previous permits were granted without such exhaustive review and conditions and without the benefit of such substantial engineering review and technical requirements being imposed. The applicant has assisted in providing engineering studies and working drawings for control measures. The applicant does not object to the recommendations of the Environmental Review Committee and the Building and Zoning Department recommendations. It is essential to this project, however, that further excavation be permitted to allow for an economically, viablerefilling already excavated areas. DATED this e// day of March, 1988. Res tfu submitted, J. nthony Hoare • At orney for Service Corporation of Washington, Applicant • - 5 - • • LAW OFFICC OF • . J. ANTHONY HOARE , OO WATCRFRONT PLACC 1011 WCSTERN AVENUE SEATTLC.WASHINGTON P61O4 • (2061 620.3029 SUMMARY OF APPEAL ISSUES File No. SA-076-87 SERVICE CORPORATION OF WASHINGTON, Appellant A) The water table or water level of the aquifer has not been breached or exposed. B) Further excavation will not reach the water level of the aquifer. C) Significant mitigating and protective measures have been designed to reduce or eliminate any significant risk to public health, safety or welfare. D) The aquifer where the excavation is to take place does not serve any domestic or City water sources. E) There is a high demand for quality backfill material for both private and public works projects. F) Allowing further excavation will have the positive result of reducing the number of truck miles traveled on Renton city streets. • - 6 • - LAw OFFICE OF J. ANTHONY HOARE 900 WATERFRONT PLACE loll WESTERN AVENUE SEATTLE WASHINGTON DOIO4 • I2OC)620•3029 RZA , 714 RITTEIvi-iUUSE-ZEMAN&ASSOIATES, INC. Geotechnical&Hydrogeological Consultants 1400 140th Avenue N.E. Bellevue, Washington 98005 (206) 746-8020 31 March 1988 W-5176-1 City of Renton City Council Municipal Building Renton, Washington 98055 Subject: Plan's Examiner Review Comments Service Corporation. of Washington File No. SA-076-87 Gentlemen: We are writing this letter to discuss the hearing examiner's findings relative to Service Corporation of Washington's permit application to continue excavation and filling operations at the Greenwood Cemetery site in Renton, Washington. This letter addresses general geotechnical considerations of the hearing examiner's findings, conclusions and decision rendered on 17 March 1988 decision provided to us. Service Corporation of Washington has applied to continue to excavate sand from an existing borrow pit on the east margin of the cemetery complex. At the time of our last site visit, the soils exposed in the pit consisted predominantly of clean, fine to medium sands. The east pit was initially planned to extend elevation 317 feet, some 30 to 40 feet below the previous existing site grades in the area. The clean, fine sand in the easternmost pit and the gravelly sand previously excavated in westerly Phase I pit, are interpreted to be glacial recessional deposits of the Vashon Stade of the Fraser Glaciation. This interpretation is confirmed by surficial geologic mapping provided by Luzier in the State of Washington/USGS Water Resources Division Water Supply Bulleting No. 28. That publication, entitled "Geology and Groundwater Resources of the Southwestern King Service Corporation of Washington W-5176 31 March 1988 Page 2 County, Washington", provides a discussion of groundwater resources and geologic conditions., together with well logs in the Renton area. Classification of the upper sands is further substantiated by exposures of "hard pan" or glacial till at the bottom of the western Phase I excavation, near elevation 315. This till material is found stratigraphically below the glacial recessional soils. The log of an on-site well indicates some 57 feet on nonsaturated soils below the ground surface elevation. The well is reportedly located at an intermediate location between the two excavation phases. This depth or a similar thickness of nonsaturated soils should likewise be expected in the easternmost Phase II pit area as was encountered in Phase I. We understand and concur with the concerns of the hearing examiner with respect to protecting the future integrity of the aquifer from the City is presently obtaining its municipal water supplies west of the site. However, we offer the following data which -indicates to us that the- aquifer supply for the City is hydraulically separated from the "perched" groundwater conditions present above the glacial till which is a relatively impermeable aquiclude present at depth below this site. 1. The City of Renton well field is in a highly productive aquifer, the horizontal limits of which are defined by a glacially carved bedrock channel of the Cedar River. The relative location of the cemetery and the municpal well field are shown on Figure 1 attached with this letter. 2. The city wells are located near I-405 and are screened at depths 35 to 105 feet below the well field ground surface elevation near elevation 30 feet. This aquifer level is some 300 feet vertically in elevation below the ground surface elevation at the proposed pit bottom. 3. The surface water to be infiltrated on site as part of the final configuration is to be cleaned through sedimentation chambers and oil-water separators. This pretreatment of site surface water is intended to protect the future integrity of the local groundwater regime. Service Corporation of Washington W-5176 31 March 1988 Page 3 4. The existing perched groundwater present at the site is interpreted to be the result of the presence of the glacial till aquiclude, which is of very low permeability and serves to impede vertical groundwater movement except at exceptionally low or negligible rates. 5. Off-site migration of groundwater, if any, would therefore be horizontal rather than vertical . The horizontal distance separating the site from the Renton well fields is more than one mile. Contrary to the hearing examiners findings, such horizontal movement would allow for percolation and filtration by the normal subsurface constituents., such as soils, gravel and sands, in our opinion. 6. Previous studies by others, (Brown and Randall CH2M-Hill , 1987) have rated the overall significance of "cemetery sites" as potential contaminant sources in the City water supply to be "low", even though the probability of occurrence was rated to be "high". This finding is attributed to be the result of the hydraulic separation between the upper perched groundwater levels and the Cedar River aquifer afforded by the relatively impermeable glacial till soils and bedrock. In summary, the aquifer protection which the hearing examiner believes would be afforded by cessation of excavation recommended in the findings would be negligible, in our opinion, as the potential for communication between groundwater leaving the site, if any, in the municipal well fields is low, in our opinion. We understand Service Corporation of Washington has recently negotiated a new contract with an excavating company to continue excavation of site soils and backfill the existing pits. We have previously outlined geotechnical performance specifications so as to complete this operation to provide suitable conditions for cemetery use once the backfilling has occurred. We concur with the hearing examiners findings that import fill materials be screened so as to exclude specific prohibited materials from the backfill . We have been contacted by Mr. Bob Anderson of Service Service Corporation of Washington W-5176 31 March 1988 Page 4 Corporation of Washington, who has requested that Rittenhouse-Zeman & Associates perform intermittent periodic observation of the contractor's operations so as to document backfilling of the borrow pits. Such control would also allow for screening of import fill soils so as to reduce the potential of incorporation of potential contaminants in the fill mass. The hearing examiner is also concerned with respect to future covenants on the subject property. We would be pleased to discuss potential remediation efforts or modifications of contractor's operations so as to allow alternate site useage of the project site, if so desired. In our opinion, enough fill remains to be placed in the Phase I excavation so as to allow adequate modification of fill placement operations to incorporate desired cemetery uses of this parcel in the future. We trust this letter is sufficient for your present needs. Should you have any questions regarding this letter or other topics, please feel free to call at your -earliest convenience. Respectfully submitted, RITTENHOUSE-ZEMAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. GR&" 14} ‘Q-4-11re- �or*„041C \ i••s NIAH1/4 `�Q 1 y & Kurt W. Groesch, P.E. :, 44, Associate ff'•., �• ..•.;�fGisSE.•�� . �'% ,� PONN�-�c. • • • PREPARED IN COOPERAT WITH THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY - .R.5 E. ==.-----, ..„:,, --(;',4r':.-._.,_, .A.1.%"7... -',-.".'‘ ,`X.,' ,.:i..-NN:••-•... N...V.IT,;Pp'fiA eilltrr:?' .. ir---:- •. Qvt W QLr..1 `\` Q X \...‘1. \\ 5 ,,�{ #..tit t.J i! Sl ' - • 44 t 4. \ , „1... ,_,.0 1 s •k•Z, ;NO.,V''',',.*,•,:k,!,,ti4.4"A‘x\y'.....ii$:,,,i..."..:7,, 1.,arcr-4141.60,1, .• •/. 1 _ .� -.` \ - �� \ `v h � ? 4 \ r- 1, • �_yf`7 1. l ✓_ \\ .\t\ 1.1\',Ovr_...• . •`•..,e` . 'iy ,,--a �. r i,i r` \' 1- z ? a1 Q' Qu '' :A �--. '•---;e1`f� g'T----,f: 1' '� 4p\-'. is A�" %_-`'.,,:r,`. �Ft Qvi' • X" _ ,;',i; j C' `t` , �\ :; Qvr �, i ••a, 17 /�-i• I. '.QvI\/,>. y:. 'Lop 1. i ^. '\'..it` `•QSA-}:A� �u •�.7.;_. ._ �1 rt+ r't .r''•:.�•�: wits 9. .+}.•` `� �,;' ,.. �_ 8 • •' _". ;�x 9 .' V •}'(Q•., :S.•ye L !\, �'•a,A:. •t i 72,_i/, N�;:<>,,:__.` T 7 ;i�.Fl Q6. * %r :. r Ip i 111 _ ,:Ja.,• \ ,4 ' :.\ P'. -:::. ` 'ci.- `9 6i-111 I`e/jsl'�.1e' ; ;I:i, :fij. •• .Tt..•s QP • 1 , IV •Qvr a.6,C� • r ^` il • `. `-.- is\•` r •'• ' \. ` %i '\ • ,�� .. __._�. :�. •Qvi ( `.` --\ \. ., ,•, \ s�\1,1:,:. �'� \ ,'_i'� ..A•. t .:. ::�, -; -=.� ._ 1,`f` `' ��\ E `V'i,1,- 'fsa-i...ra n� @,, :: sr, 02se,. L. l \ •. 1 rJa' ►.:— N1 ._ — j-.. �., it 1 :' \ _(t' ~\� Y,hJ'- _du _ 'q , Chito'vr ;", `c;Z:• • •:• - - ' � 4 m ya0 `nr• -• �@ \ ,;.�..•-.e.,,.ryF. ..i``n%..� ��} ,CJJ ��• __ty., lI • • .', Qvi,. `-,1 gym. \ j• e ��_p�,r f.•/, �,, ,•• : ..� Qvr '_ .:. .^ "a~Y,'i • T, :Qua ' '.� : '1 r !�: .• :` - -_Qvr, 2Q'1',• '.' � '`.�::> • ."' _ 1 1'` /0 i:s& ,i L,,,,.,_ - __ ,Jti - 1 •�: `. -'� y J _ ' _ E.: •''-J �I,''.-•• ��Wr� 19 . '.;. ▪v�a'Qy . I=- i :_. 1} _.` — , � ' Qua r _ ., .\\•-•. 1\ c.Qu;-z. -"i,l. ti �.• 1 , emre.. ea-c•.� �•.— \ i �y� \Qvr 1�m w .��..pN;F�" ;�pi -`,- — z \`66•i Qvri 111 ,t. . — i.t. 3 ;'s 1. \ +, `` ^•`--C • • ,_nt) i•, ,�•:::a�..� Cr'- i, Z.. is-.` ) '1 \ •',::3+; —•\ ✓'' j i r a • I' :?•.•`, • • t. •;1 /\/"\ .. \ sue"`„• ': ,. - .�,,._` \�i 1 `;,�`' i I_fl:- :''',' 1 40,. . .... : _• 5: { >� \cc• ''.•�" -- .3:2.r;•._•) __ , . 2'f • -.-,. -1.'. C 28 C\/, }r!Lt• ?7i'• ;tr-,�.,'?/• •t!• 26 Qvr vi - ,r_'; • ''•0,•- _ • t>o-., ^'\ 5 / �� '�' •''•'�: 3 \Qvt ,�+;,` ` `�1�•L;O.N/., 1 ---' -I 3 .,•.:�`"`�.-i `.� ss, .I• -•is .. \-= gat �.S ? \- . =�, ig "+ k r. re.4--,----,- 40„ --,,..--,•,1 :;�\ • <" •1 1 \',` QN O C/•��•`90. A/Q-� - „'24 - r • ' . .OV 4 \.;i !: _,!._ _ `\ ‘�\...:" 1\�• �:\ac+ - -�r.� 1; •; `! \;_ .›.&...,... ..OCtIc.V)P. X..,,' ' ' , r ' A'''` .\ y I`` S`i2 tip•,.. Qvt` ,' '.=' 00 .. Qvu\ ` -- �Fi Qvr; '' t•E2 `t '��\ s T..y ' Figure 1 Vicinity Map Service Corporation of Washington W-5176-1 RITTENHOUSE-ZEMAN& RZA W.O. &ASSOCIATES, INC. BY KWG Geotechnical& Hydrogecal r Consultants r DATE 1400 140th Avenue N.E. SCALE 1" = 4000' Bellevue, WA 98005 ismilm • AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )ss. County. of King ) DOTTY 'KLINGMAN , being first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and states: That on the 17th day of March , 1g88 , affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. - / 44/ 1.144;;72-1440.~r) SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this / day of / Uidi , 1988 t (2e N tart' blic in and for the State of Washington, residi a //�'nr- Imp 4A -, therein. Application; petition, or Case #: SA-076-87 - SERVICE CORPORATEON OF WASHINGTON (GREENWOOD CEMETERY) (The minutes contain a list of the parties of record.) • March 17, 1988 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION APPLICANT: SERVICE CORPORATION OF WASHINGTON File No: SA-076-87 LOCATION: 350 Monroe Avenue N.E. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Special Permit to fill and grade on an existing permit to allow completion and restoration of the site. The applicant proposes to remove 142,000 cubic yards of existing material and place 295,000 cubic yards of new fill on the property. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Building and Zoning Department Recommendation: Approval. BUILDING & ZONING The Building & Zoning Department Report was DEPARTMENT REPORT: received by the Examiner on February 23, 1988 PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Building and Zoning Department Report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES The hearing was opened on March 1,, 1988 at 11:15 A.M. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit #1 - Yellow File containing application, proof of posting and publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit #2 - Drawing of Phase II, east pit, on subject site. Exhibit #3 - Drawing of Phase I, west pit, on subject site. Exhibit #4 - By Reference - Hearing Examiner's Decision on Special Permit #033-87. Exhibit #5 - Five photos showing the wheel wash system, concrete pad as well as the rock entry on subject site. The hearing opened with a presentation of the staff report by Senior Planner, Jeanette Samek- McKague. In her review she noted further excavation of this site will not meet the aquifer level; this is an extension of permit SP-048-85; pointed out the existence of significant residential areas nearby; the applicant will be doing correction work on Phase I in the west pit and may be removing material for Phase II, with this project being completed within two years. She stated the ERC reviewed and issued revised mitigating conditions which included such matters as haul routes, inspection of fill material by the Health Department; fill material is to be no larger than 8" in diameter, there will be monitoring of leachate in fill material, provision of 2 monitoring wells on the site, replacement of vegetation setbacks, hours of operation, provision of clean-up facilities for trucks, posting of bonds for street clean-up, performance bond by contractor and submission of contract with contractor to the City for review. Continuing Mrs. Samek-McKague stated this operation will limit the truck trips to 60 per day which was a condition of the last Special Permit approval for this site; there is a landscape buffer on the west side of the site which is to be maintained by the applicant; the noise and dust ' , Service Corporation of Washing“,.. 'SA-076-87 March 17, 1988 Page 2 concerns should be'dismissed with the implementation of the mitigation measures by the ERC; surface water now percolates to the aquifer which raises concerns as to possible contamination. Referring to the geotechnical report for the site she noted the report raised concerns about the drainage system and set out measures to halt sedimentation from entering the aquifer. Referring to a report submitted by a consultant referencing the soils on the site it was pointed out how important oil/water separator systems are during this operation; the site will continue to be used as part of the Greenwood Cemetery; any work being done on the site must have plans submitted to CH2M Hill to ensure no harm will come to the aquifer and water supply; monitoring wells on the hillside were discussed. It was recommended the request be approved subject to compliance with ERC conditions; the applicant will install a temporary hose bib adjacent to the entrance to be used for washing the trucks; measures be taken to keep all vehicles mechanically tuned to prevent noise; the trucks trips be spread over the two year period of the permit; the applicant provide a bond to the City to ensure maintenance and replacement of plants in the 30 ft. buffer; and the applicant submit for approval to the City Engineer and CH2M Hill plans for temporary and permanent storm water drainage as well as rehabilitation plans for the site. Testifying in support of this proposal as a representative of the applicant was: Anthony Hoare, 1011 Western Avenue, Seattle, WA. 98104, attorney. He pointed out Service Corporation of Washington is the new owner of the Greenwood Cemetery, with a new contractor. He noted phase I has been excavated to its fullest depth with no further excavation planned; the new contractor is working with a system that will collect the surface water and run it through the materials that are to be delivered to the pit; he found no problem with the required material to be used in the pit; feels the 8" limitation on diameter of material is too restrictive but the Examiner explained that restriction is a part of the City Ordinance and can not be modified. Phase II has not been fully excavated; the closest residential area is east of Phase II approximately 200 ft. from the eastern boundary with an existing cyclone fence separating the pit from the apartment area which contains very little landscaping. He stated the elevation of the apartment house is higher than this property and feels it would be difficult to eliminate the apartment complex residents' view of the excavation site without placing new 40 - 50 ft. trees in place, which he feels is not practical. Mr. Hoare noted the road is only for access by the contractor; this is a very short-term project and it is felt landscaping the southwest corner of Phase I is not needed as there is already natural vegetation in place; feels hours of operation should begin at 7:00 A.M. which is consistent with other pits in the area; reviewed the conditions and feels bonding conditions #8, and #10 should be deleted. He concluded with a brief review of the report submitted by a Soils Engineer noting the research was requested by the applicant to be sure of the materials to be used in the fill and the stability of the pit itself; straw will be used to keep the area of the drainage lines carrying water into the aquifer clear of sedimentation; and stated other conditions of staff are agreeable. Also speaking for the applicant was Nick Horn, Ewing and Associates, 1314 South Central, Kent, WA. 98032 who referenced the drainage systems to be used in this proposal and the geotechnical report for the property, with the final system being installed at the end of the operation to permit material and water to be collected from the different grades on the site; oil/water separator devices will be used; the water will be eliminated from going down the center of the site but will travel along the western edge of the exposed surface of the aquifer in a trench system similar to that in Phase I. He stated portions of Phase II have already been taken down to the aquifer level approved by the City; removal and reintroduction of materials on the site will have temporary erosion control shown on drawings to be provided for the removal; and Mr. Horn asked for clarification as to conditions 2, 5, and 6 regarding testing by public agencies and requested if those conditions could be combined. The new contractor for this site, Jim Donovan, Boulevard Excavating, P. O. Box 68128, Seattle,, WA. 98188 presented Exhibit #5 and noted his firm has taken many precautions to protect the streets of the City as shown on the photos; requested the hours of operation be changed to reflect a 7:00 A.M. starting time stating he had called the City a number of times to obtain these hours, and feels if they are permitted to begin at the earlier time, his trucks and equipment would be off city streets by 3:00 P.M. which is the beginning of the evening traffic peak hours. Bob Anderson, 350 Monroe Avenue East. Renton, WA. 98056, new owner of Greenwood Cemetery, testified his main objective is to fill the pits as soon as possible so they can move on with the further development of the business. He feels his business is a vital part of the community; feels the existing landscaping at the cemetery is very attractive and as future landscaping is accomplished it too will be attractive and eye-appealing to the community. Attorney Hoare clarified the appeal period attached to this decision and noted the applicant's permit has expired. The Examiner pointed out the City has encouraged applicants with permits of this nature to re-apply as early as 6 months previous to the expiration of a permit to ensure an on-going operation. Senior Planner Samek-McKague clarified ordinance requirements as to size of fill, landscape buffers and hours of operation. She advised the applicant the ERC did set ' Service Corporation of Washing • 'SA-076-87 March 17, 1988 Page 3 the hours of operation but it is possible they would consider an earlier A.M. time noting the Public Works Department feels the evening hours are more critical traffic peak periods than mornings hours. The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak, and no further comments from staff. The Examiner requested an additional week to render his decision due to his departure for vacation. There was no objection to this request and the hearing was closed at 12:25 P.M. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicant, Service Corporation of Washington, filed a request for approval of a Special Permit to allow the excavation, grading and filling of approximately 13.10 acres of property at the Greenwood Cemetery complex. 2. The yellow file containing the staff report, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. 3. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the City's responsible official, issued a Declaration of Non-Significance (DNS) for the subject proposal. 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. 5. The subject site, which actually consists of two separate parcels, is located along N.E. 2nd Street, just north of the King County Shops, the Renton District Court and the Renton City Shops. The western acreage, Phase 1, is located along Monroe and fronts Monroe for approximately two-thirds of the frontage between N.E. 4th Street and N.E. 2nd Street. The eastern acreage, Phase 2, is located at the corner of N.E. 2nd Street and the southerly extension of Queen Avenue N.E. (128th Avenue S.E. - King County). 6. Both sites have been previously excavated under a number of permits. The most recent permit to expire was Special Permit 048-85. The applicant proposes to fill the pit created by the excavation of the Phase 1 parcel with approximately 142,000 cubic yards of material to raise the contours of the site to those approximating the surrounding terrain, elevation 346.5. 7. On the Phase 2 parcel, the applicant proposes potentially excavating approximately 107,000 cubic yards of material and then filling the site with approximately 153,000 cubic yards of material. 8: Using a fourteen cubic yard truck capacity as a basis for calculating the number of truck -j trips provides the following numbers: Phase 1 Fill 10,143 trips Phase 2 Excavate 7,643 trips Fill, if excavated 10,929 trips Fill, no excavation 3,500 trips (approx.) 9. A thirty foot buffer has been required around the perimeter of the site as a condition of the earlier permits. Landscaping of this setback has also been required. Landscape materials have withered as a result of dry weather and some of the excavation operations. The ERC required replanting these areas. 10. The plans submitted indicate retention on site of storm and surface water. The aim is to permit these waters to recharge the underlying aquifer. The site is located within the City's aquifer protection area. This area serves the City as a primary source of drinking water. 11. Both pits have cut into the aquifer, and what appears to be ponded or impounded water at the bottom of the pits is actually an exposed portion of the underground aquifer. With direct access to this water contaminants could easily enter the aquifer without benefit of percolating through or filtration by the normal surface constituents such as soils, gravel and sands. ( ' • Service Corporation of Washingt.... ' SA-076-87 March 17, 1988 Page 4 12. This breaching of the aquifer has concerned the King County Health Department and the Department of Ecology because, again, anything placed in the pit will at this time have immediate access to the aquifer without benefit of any filtration. 13. A field trip substantiated the geotechnical report's conclusions that materials including large rock, concrete chunks and other construction debris are incorporated into the subject site. Discarded tires were also in evidence during the excursion. The Ordinance specifies that materials be irreducible to not larger than 8 inches in diameter. It is obvious that this provision was ignored. 14. The Geotechnical Assessment prepared for this project indicates that the combination of fill materials generally utilized in operations such as this, combined with the method of placement, will provide a poor foundation for construction ("serve unfavorably" is the terminology used in the report) and possibly even for burial sites ("The poor sidewall stability of the backhoe trenches also indicates considerable difficulty could be anticipated for excavation and installation of underground vaults or other conventional burial purposes.") 15. The report goes on: "We suspect that long-term settlement may be on the order of 2 to 3 feet, much of which will be in the form of differential settlement. "For planning purposes, heavily loaded structures or intensive developments should not be located over the center of the pit, but rather towards the perimeter of the pit where underlain by the controlled fill placed per the above guidelines (guidelines omitted.). If the locations of the settlement-sensitive facilities can be determined in advance, special compactive efforts may be completed as the fill is placed if greater thicknesses of random fill are to be present." (Field Exploration Geotechnical Engineering Assessment - Rittenhouse-Zeman & Associates, Inc., March 27, 1987). 16. The applicant proposes a series of operations to preserve and protect the existing aquifer. Straw bales will be used to prevent siltation of the exposed ground water. Fine materials added to or accidently allowed to enter the exposed water or cover over the water could effectively seal the aquifer and prevent future recharge. In addition, positive measures will channel surface water back to the aquifer by means of a pipe/basin system and perforated pipes. Oil/water separation will be included to prevent contamination. Surface trenches will route the water to the system and an eventual system located to the south where the aquifer will be recharged. CONCLUSIONS 1. The refilling of the two pits most definitely appears to serve the public use and interest - if for no other reason than to protect the exposed aquifer. The excavation of additional materials does not appear to serve the public use and interest since this would delay protection of the exposed aquifer. 2. The fact that excavation breached any barrier between the aquifer and potential contamination is a source for continuing concern. What also raises concern is the fact that apparently little effort was made to control what occurred at the two sites by way of both filling and illegal dumping. Inspection reveals that materials violative of the City Ordinances have been placed in the pits. These materials consist of obviously oversized construction debris as well as some discarded tires. 3. Whatever was, or is dumped into these two pits can easily, and probably has, entered the exposed aquifer with potential adverse affects on the public health, safety and welfare. The sooner the aquifer is protected the better. The only practical method is refilling the pits. Therefore, under the circumstances no additional excavation is appropriate. Additional excavation would only delay the refilling of the pits and the capping of the aquifer. 4. The aquifer is exposed and will remain so until the pit is refilled. Additional excavation might engender a number of additional problems. Additional excavation: 1) could enlarge the surface area of the exposed water increasing the opportunity for contamination; 2) would ultimately increase the quantity of imported materials thereby increasing the risk of importation of contaminated materials; and 3) generate additional truck trips and quarrying operations which increases the opportunities for fuel spills. Where the public • , Service Corporation of Washingt - SA-076-87 March 17, 1988 Page 5 health and safety are at issue, there are reasonable grounds to deny a permit to allow further excavation. (Goldblatt v. Town of Hempstead, N.Y., 82 S.Ct. 987, 369 U.S. 590, 8 L.Ed.2d 130, 1962). In that case the town had an ordinance which prohibited excavations into or below the surface two feet above the ground water level. In the instant case the ground water has already been exposed. There is no justification to allow additional excavation and increase whatever risks have already been created. There shall be no further excavation. 5. The conditions imposed by the ERC regarding transport appear reasonable. They are related to the traffic demands of the peak hours and the limited arterial system in the vicinity of the subject site. They also appear to provide ample opportunity to permit trucks to have access to the site. 6. Regarding the other conditions imposed by the ERC, this office has not been presented with any evidence which clearly demonstrates that any condition imposed by the ERC should be modified in any manner, therefore, those conditions imposed by the ERC shall be a condition of approval. 7. This office can't help but express and amplify the concerns expressed by staff, the- applicant's geotechnical consultant and the County Health Department. The site has not been well treated by the applicant or his predecessor-in-interest. Large quantifies of organic materials, wood and oversized materials have been placed in the site under previous fill permits and apparently voids have been created. When coupled with the geotechnical report, one is left with the unmistakable conclusion that extreme care must be taken in any further operation of the site as a fill site. 8. The expertise evidenced by the geotechnical report cannot be ignored. The record demonstrates that the need for the imposition of a condition or covenant which requires any development other than simple or conventional graves, and even this option may be questionable, be preceded by a complete geotechnical review of the site. A covenant would alert any purchaser or reviewing official of the possibly sensitive or even unfavorable conditions which underlay the site and assure that any subsequent development is not jeopardized. While current plans call for cemetery expansion, nothing would prevent the sale of the acreage to other parties for other purposes - purposes for which the site might not be fit. Since refilling the site is undertaken with City approval, it is incumbent to alert future purchasers, that the site was refilled for use as a cemetery and that the underlying soils may not permit more intense development. In addition, development of the site is not limited to burial and could encompass an expanded or additional mortuary or funeral home. Therefore, a covenant running with the land and clearly identifying the geotechnical risks shall be required and said covenants shall require that any subsequent development withstand scrutiny by further timely geotechnical reporting. 9. The appropriateness of the site for future burial purposes is also questionable. The geotechnical report indicates a potential settlement of the surface at differential rates and on an order of from 2 to 3 feet. "In addition, the low and variable nature of the existing fill would make support of any settlement sensitive structure, such as masonry or stone mausoleums, difficult or impossible without extensive mitigative efforts." (Page 3, Ibid). Therefore, reuse of the site even as a cemetery could be jeopardized if the fill is not handled in a manner consistent with reuse as a cemetery. While this office will not require any particular method of fill, unless the applicant follows the prescription of the geotechnical report, reuse could be foreclosed. Unless a certified geotechnical consultant formulates an assured method of filling the site at this time, and said consultant or similar expert certifies that the site has been filled in the prescribed manner and would be suitable for cemetery purposes, again, covenants running with the land shall require that prior to reuse of the site for cemetery purposes the applicant shall subject the site to a complete geotechnical survey. 10. These requirements seem reasonable since the report concludes with the recommendation to place materials in lifts (layers of fill material) with a maximum thickness of 2 feet and that each lift be track-rolled or wheel-rolled to reduce the volume of voids. And even with these conditions imposed, the report indicates subsidence of from 1 to 3 feet may occur. The report's final proviso is: "Even with these steps, future settlement in terms of 1 to 3 feet may occur. The future uses should be reviewed in light of these anticipated movements." (Page 7, Ibid). Service Corporation of Washingt=— SA-076-87 March 17, 1988 Page 6 11. All plans for rehabilitation, that is, all aspects of the refilling of the subject site, given its sensitive location in the aquifer recharge area and the inappropriate prior actions which have taken place, shall be subject to review by the City and its selected consultant or consultants. 12. The proposed rehabilitation appears capable of being completed over a two year period and this permit shall be issued for not more than two years. The truck trips shall be reasonably apportioned over the two year interval and all hours of operation shall be subject to review with the City in its sole discretion permitted to shorten the length of hours, prohibit certain routes and limit the number of days of operation. The hours of operation shall not be lengthened. 13. The applicant shall post a bond in an amount sufficient to assure the survival or replacement of all required perimeter landscaping materials. 14. In summary, refilling the pit as conditioned by the ERC and herein appears to serve the public use and interest. The public interest would not be served by any further excavation which has the potential to further jeopardize the aquifer. DECISION There shall be no further excavation permitted under the terms of this permit except to the extent necessary to rectify existing problems with materials already imported to the site. No further native materials shall be excavated from the site. The Special Permit to Fill and Grade the site is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. All plans for rehabilitation and all progress toward that end, that is, all aspects of the refilling of the subject site, shall be subject to periodic review by the City and its selected consultant or consultants. The City shall be entitled to make reasonable spot checks by entering the site with or without consultants of its choice. 2. This permit shall be issued for not more than two years. 3. The truck trips shall be reasonably apportioned over the two year interval, and all hours of operation shall be subject to review with the City in its sole discretion permitted to reduce the number of hours, prohibit certain hauling routes and limit the number of days of operation. The hours of operation shall not be lengthened. 4. The applicant shall post a bond in an amount sufficient to assure the survival or replacement of all required perimeter landscaping materials. 5. Unless a certified geotechnical consultant formulates an assured method of filling the site at this time and said consultant or similar expert certifies that the site has been filled in the prescribed manner and would be suitable for cemetery purposes, covenants running with the land shall require that prior to reuse of the site for cemetery purposes the applicant shall subject the site to a complete geotechnical survey. 6. A covenant running with the land and clearly identifying the geotechnical risks shall be required, and said covenants shall require that any subsequent development withstand scrutiny by further timely geotechnical reporting. 7. The conditions imposed by the ERC shall be conditions of approval ORDERED THIS 17th day of March, 1988. 4-1-`1 • \<(:3" FRED J. KAU, AN HEARING EX INER • . Service Corporation of WashinL �3 . • SA-076-87 March 17, 1988 Page 7 TRANSMITTED THIS 17th day of March, 1988 to the parties of record: Anthony Hoare 1011 Western Avenue Seattle, Washington 98104 Nick Horn Ewing and Associates 1314 South Central Kent, Washington 98032 Jim Donovan Boulevard Excavating P. O. Box 68128 Seattle, Washington 98188 Bob Anderson 350 Monroe Avenue East Renton, Washington 98056 TRANSMITTED THIS 17th day of March, 1988 to the following: Mayor Earl Clymer Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator Richard Houghton, Public Works Director Members, Renton Planning Commission Larry M. Springer, Policy Development Director Glen Gordon, Fire Marshal Ronald Nelson, Building & Zoning Director Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney John Adamson, Developmental Program Coordinator Gary Norris, Traffic Engineer Renton Record-Chronicle Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 P.M. March 31, 1988. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of $75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested-parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. . ., 'LAND USE Er -MENT , .. - . .. . .•.„...... . . ,11111. Single Family :1°°°°°••1. Commercial ,-,•,•,1.,,.. i:-..•-"k,::,-•;f.'•:',',. Scale 1 99 ° immemilik • ,•;.:c•1••,...•:%,y„;.;-:•••,„:•:,.. , L. . . it• I Lowe 11611101;•-1•L: .:•:::.:,::,,:.....- ..,:. Dnsity:::::::::::•:•::::: , .:: -.:::: Multi-Family , \•::••;;,:/;,.•;:,--.--. ....„.,,,, . ......: Office / Office Park ( , . .. *.-4 .•-•„.-:', .- .0000.00,0• ',•0000.<3,3 00.0.00.00. s. . i!i ]ii :M Medium Density 00000.0., 0„cDo.:,..• ••, -0.0. 000•393°. Public/Quasi-Public ............. ,.c,c.c,..,., iViult -Fa ,,,...... , ,illumilt . ....= rt,„,. . High Density ,...c,..., , ,.••••-•,:w.••:::, Light lndustriall aigeSi:' Multi-Family ,....0. :AMER h ,,.. . A.A.A.,. . , . • , , _Lig" L'<•-•:- :.,„...„.., 0 0: .. ';'°c.e; Recreation .0 0 0 ,L Inl, ndstra 0 0 01 eaVY 1 ui . - -.22-1-c., ...,, ! Iiii.i.,,-„ . ._.......- • ii ____ t.:2;••:41§1111311 ;:i:i:::iiii:i: ai.R.v..g.,..,.,,,-7--”N ',..•••,.f....-,z,z,- ,• _____ .._, ,. ,,,, . ________ __ anufactturing Park ', i \-' . ...:•. ....,.. . . ., :::,..,- ,.r•••,,, / Multiple Opt ii 4.11) 4 ill-'2.1,1,1 1 11.11,01. ...: ,. ....bia•& froallogi .0.L •rs, _ I, 1111 \ :•:.:•:•:•:•:•:•:, 1:,si a EN ri Eli , ,• : •• ••••••• pia NEVAIN, . ° ° ° ° ° 0 r• ' 4 :::::::::.-. ,.- ::::•:.1:::::,,..zi:iiii:, In., misbAl.iiii„.., IIIIIIII1 .................... 00,00_000.00 •,..,... •••. O 0 0 0 0 0 ••0,`., ,:i:i::::: :::i:•::::(Aetit".17::....._1:*::::::::: :4,,,Nunummt o o.o..00o 0:00:0000o zoo 00:11 ,,,c i.i.„,....,..:"s.). eoeo0 , 00 jr„.., ' ••,::::::::::-",•:,e..11i!;16),t,:*:;i::* •teri .• ,, !: MIMI O 0 • 0 0 ,' = • • --ct .M.i: As,.,...,1••::::::•-• ,....,,,t.....•.,,,,,„, oc..... pr 0 . . . 0 . %. 0 _Av. :::::::,:,:,1„,...,,, .:::.. , l'agi.....„ ! 1.',..°•. 0 0 • 0 4 0 0 CI !•'' ::::::::.X.:.'' . ..'••••••••--, ',.::::.:.07.1all. ... ..a `i .• • 0 0 0 0 0 0 1\0 0 0 -,\:. ::::::::::::::: ......711.112.11•.- - L insucli,. ° ° c' e 0 0 0\ 0 o ••,-).;., ':::::i:i*: .1111111itit) oosomoo oo ., ,••:::::::: :Ir ra-444 A ..--)w J• -' -"" ,e 0 09 01 •• • •• eoo'c.,•% .::::::::, I o o • o o o o o o i r•c ::i:lir... ;,. .7--..4,17.4.1... 111111711 , .1.4.0000000000. I 4 • eo t 00000 'l;:yiL •::•) 111r-m-a I& Od• ,ID:1.00%00.0000.00000.00, ! • o e o e o o o o o• os. ',, 4' mem l':‘ 'c'': L.- o..).......,•••1 ..).4). 1.• Mos ,. F04011111 ,.IIIIIIII e .), G000 % • ..)". °ti° ° (Dc) ..---gyr.r,g • • \:.. 1..:•: co ..._ ... ..... , 00 ,3b0 ..:.:.:.:.:.:.. ...x.x.:.:.:.:„.i..... ..._. 3 ' - 40000 * . 1, .:.:::::7::.::::::.::::::::•::;:;:i:.:;7::;;.:'..'..............:::1:.;.:..-,.-• ;tall 111.: .Mk .-- •••••••• ..... .............L 000ebo -.1.; iii \ 01 •0•0• '', . 0 e 000eo . r %. ',., •,.. 1111•1•11111 . ,r..7,-----,-, -„,,,,z,1°0°0°0 0 0 ilii • . Iiiiii mg : -.. PIIIIIIIEIIIII ow' s\ N .i:iii: ,ttomallit-.0,00000,00-j„). ii, .....,,,R ,.... .i. 4. .. • . c,, •ei 11, A ••••... 1.„•ZIk\ .3..t.%:161‘ 0,.-.0 0,5.-%9 "e--).. '1* 11111111111111 ...i. ::::::. ., f00.0:81F0.;-maiiii.om 111:15,111111., ,.) ii.A ..........••••........ al* 1 '7 Sialliii " :' .9..e9'EP 1.1,t. I"-- 444 r•••••°•°:,°•"" :•;,•:',..-:::::i.,::,..;.::,.,..• lignmegly... sm,,,,,t, ,. ....-46,4,,,-.1-. ••,...!::.:.:1.:E.:!!!.:!.::,:.E..„.•._ I ,,, ---,---,...",,A,,.:-.- ...* - , 4..1 , ' •• •,'---- •....e...-.7.-.=•:•-.7.,.. •..:„Iiiin-----,;---0.0.":,T ,. , ......:y___1..,,,,,I.r t„.......„ Ar . tp 4,,,,, ,,, ...............:•:.x.x.x.x.:••••• ..0-0,!........,;000....0.0, . c-il ILItsla . '...'"i-- -.V '''''.i.,,..\i'S. \ ....:',:•:•,,,,,:':':':•:'''.. '.0000. - -•000000000., 1 l'il , I ':*i:i*:..-..-.4,7.7-,:,.........::::i:iiiiiif:::.*. 4111.11,i.1. '' ---:•.1 IL ,---Ak., 'ff-"' ...N4 .... :::::::::::::::::::::::,:••• ....:•::: o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0•0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ', :.__..,...el ow..1 *::::*:::::::::::::::::::::::::i:::::::::::::::x. .....••• OM • kli... ...., .14... ,1,,,, s,;,,,,,„:\• ,,. ••:::::::::::::•:,• ..:,::::::::::::.•.0 0 0..,-.,.0 000.••!•.00000090000..00.!• ,..:,::.:.:.:.::::::. 11.111. ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::i::::::::::::::::::::. ' rw grjr,1 . *.: ':''':::1:‘,:,-,:k.:'•,,‘,,,, '. .*::'.. .....:::ii.:i.:iii.*iiiii:.:.:i:,P09§10°09)%9393,,o,.01,0,9_,0,0.•000 i; • :::::::::::::,*•.o.:.., "."":" .::::::i:::::::::]*]*:::::::*::::::::::::::::::::, 'g'g Al 11141011,..r1Fi' ? .Aitt A...'.'.:::::.. -i.r3. . ..::::::::*iiii:::ii:ii.:ii•:::,;:iii i•O°00°00°0001:re,... '...-.00.00'..•,,0,,,,...', ,:::::-. --i:::i:i:i:i:i:ii,:•••:•:::: :i:i:i:::K:i:iii:i::m:.: : ::•.::•••• •,0 o•.:•,,,, vim . ...,.,4 „,,„ ...../ A ai -,. ___ _•.-:.,;,...,.,...,.-1'''' .::?:.*:::?:0: :::::Miii ..°1?"0°108)10°0,f. '0°0' 1.-•:":0•" ' li.:?:: :°0a. ..... • '.., . IIII ilreliiikif-11.411 0"•0.°0'°;.• : : inf0f0f0f0°0° '.,,.P.°'...:....,0090.);1,. :::.::i:'..::.; .,... I Iiiiit.., ,A.,111:r.)'40"- -: .77 ,dri• .0000• ' •••••••••••••••••••••••••'.- ) .•' , .., 4, .,.,, ...0.0000000. .,:;. ,,,,---------7-i-,,. .. ,to,,...:.:...i...:: ::.:: -.....,. _ ,.., •,... ,,, ,, •s ,, . • 1 „......,c: *,:,:::::::::::::::::::::: •ef-t.y/ .......,N,.e. •.'.. .if, - • , ,•,. toc'(O°0°I.o°Eio.b.1 ,• IlliallIIIIMMio.. :err' , . • ..• , . ....................„„ . •.•.•.• •..... ; 16;1 , •MEIBOIIMIIIIP./A• .,.. ,,,,,,joi...* . - NO111101,411 it 0 • ..." ,•L'',, N. I , •:::::::::::::::::::::•:::: ,./.9V1' .000. '••••....... ' •••••••••••..... •gen dia.M.Mil .°°;4/1%, .Ilk, •(211 1 C **:•••:•:: ..1 f ;.',`'•s:1 ??..4, ,,f:. • ,:•:•••••••'...:.: ''', summits@ ow V.° ...?, - .11111111.• ,'; , ....t . :*:::. ...(3 '3:,[0:4!'.,,'•-•`,• ' ,,:..:1!".. ...Y-..:::::::::::•:• N e 1111111111EMS1... . • •••,..., ••••••4--,.;,.; :''.,,. ••.:';"i. .. •::::::::•:•:•:•::):•• 1:„',;','2',:,.?•:,....,...C!,.!', us,',) ':'::::::•:•:•:':':':': ..'. .3 .1111BILIEV•4-jr" :,' '• '• stii--- ... . :'4.i ''. ''' ....'w '".'.,3 ^..-;'..0'''..'-';'; .:•9..,-,. f%., :':.•'•:•:.::•:•:.:•:. n:13 .siesisot'ar 1 ,i.... „.;, •... •.. ...y,,,..,„4.. •..4,„.,,. ,4..,,..,...., ,•,..„5„;r''''''" e' •"..........%•losmosims•i '•'''S. '- 'T•'''''•'er''' ' i.'';'.1•ii`",• •.- ,;•• '" 6.' ..7.''..o •'•'-,v .-., -'0: ..: °•-,.,,', '•:•:-:•.....•••••••• .;'::.i. ,6'.'.;' , •'.isme...asmse, •••)-!.,q.' .'.!'!' :••14*-,'S ft l&'•••' .''‘f:,- :r3).e.,?--ri•,'a,;P••c.ii#:,;••••• ,:•°-?.,?i,f.:,'?,-.2.,,`?:-•9' •-:.:.:.:.:.:::•::: ii Aiitng-1?!Y :,:;,':,••<:•*`: .1r0/412,,,,cf.,_:', 1.11,-."41,2-- •,',,,r).,;;:le,;,`,'••:,T,ili':!.' - -,;•6::,:,:•••)•,-.',...,../.2",.,.:,•e•,;(:3;,.., •'.:.::•:::•: 11110 ,...f ',:t, .,..i.;.-:•, No iiklikrig ' •" ., ''--09 w't \A.m. '.?•••':•'4''''.,-,'•' '''':7'4,5 :'.f/:-.4V41. .:,, ...... • ::,'4,.',4•,.,.;.,,,,,..., :•%,,,,..,.,-,,,?,,,,..,.• ,.i,,-,,.. -<,..„.,,,,, \nor ..,,,,,,,,. ..-- .,'t,,:'•f •)'. 6'c•fli.','• .,,,'- • •'..•:',',/,.•'",' 4 : mat, ..,, -•.-:•,,:::,;:,..; ::::..9'n- . -mit ni.,,,,....:,/ . .‘‘,.,14 miAm .....x;:,,;,cc),- ....: :,-::•,..,:, :',..2..,:-.,-.3.':-..., . .,„ . ip , ',''',',!:;:';C:',,,:.,,,,,. k).„ •.. gb. • .% •!*,-;.:•.';',','',-:,',.-',,:, ,- ,.. ..:...e1.?„, ,,')c•!,,.)-E, ---7 s41111111',.(7-t• 'c.c.',916r.is::11;t4:(;:i.:•-,. •1 .,,,,r A 16.. ".‘,. ., „„..4114(,-..c,,,....-t.,o, ,z,';444...•••.''.6` - -- Val . ,, A 11 ) A.'.. •,.::i,(..:AA,4),L.,!%,A..,,,,Z A.,,.:,,,.g.,',.,. ,I A .,...._ - 1.0r4,.VI'r •e•A ' •I nil. , A00000. ''•'"C"1 . •t 3'.. '''. ..'. 1,7•'. .---'''::'*•'\''''S\r. 4 3.("45. er'::.C.V.r.,...'sK 44)0.e.•(-•".•il'A,''.'rt':7 A.: •....0.0.0 8 3 0 83*, 0•“...A1.(1‘,.QC.: ......pir • A < 'I. • \ ''., v rt• , .• r .t) -.Cr 2\ ..0,.).;:o''.4::t3..);; r;,,•();,;;Li.. , A...t) jei,4,gf.',.6' '''''-','-',%'-': ---, c'.17.c,:'0'.r.;(1nr•r:fr,(21--!:E.''.%; '',',<,''.),• ,.., • c),-.).••••,4).• --)•••,-,,,„ ,, .,;;.1 ';dc.. ;1,-,,IL.,•,,•, ',,,.,•0,,'•,• 7::-•-' ,.-i ..."'•' .-•='<:V(;.i'ek.)`;'))k.„,,-.,-.,:fei,1 41,''':-•• '.',.,...,',," ,:,F2.,- -..;..,..,),..,-,,,-.;,:f.5.,;*.;)f•,;.::, III ,k 't). %,°, .cf.,Yli.e.:., „-0; 10f.. -;:::...0..s•a,;;;;P,..;..;.7.,",7',i7-1-}:.•?•':,,•'..- • .....,-.,-,.re.--,..",.....0.. --..-c •••,..-.4'..,5 2 r..;....,„,..,,,,../.•,...,:..-,,-,•,.• •,,,,-.t..,• - • .4.,. 4. .• •-•••-..,‘••.,-P'..:.P t'•''''''••7'.`..•-• •.-;' ''''''144 7' ' i-r-•`••• - .,;••'')':'• '' - :''..f'- '' , . •;• •;,•••AY.Livl.„,,%,• ,• 1-••:te,..,;; '.‘.:',,'''.4",', ,i?• ' •V,Q` . 1. $01,..,'.... •,. 4 / 'i• •:. :,,,,, •. , „„_.- . - 's. • 1 ... .•:::::::::::•:, i'?.2.,:.,•Is.,.t,'•,,':.,',,,:•',.,;•,..;;:.,),•,' : ",''..•:L'„,b' ''• .1..,.,'',..,czi v.:•• •• ?,..; .(t)'•;,,,.,•,',„,`„,v,••St);•`0.•.,..,,,: + 4 --,, 1',' ,,....),-,•=7),:s..,1..,A ------- ...r r,,,,... ., , ,S • /.::::::::::::::::::::i*:.. ' )cc.'-0.,,,-, 'Yr,.,,•-f•."0,.1.f.J.co" . .. -i•tte,1-0•;•', '60)iq`.1„t‘,' .3:0;0•)‘'t,•7,t,•01".0. ' P 4141114 . 1:.;:`?fr'n,'Oi.Z.3•Pc3.•:C:i; .-:4", flrilr*,,k...‘,': -.,_,•-..:::i:::i:if::i:i:i::::::::::::::::. '- ' •?, •,,..L.::.3,Jo.: ,., •0,00• z•,-, ,'L,:s ,.-.... •• L'u-..c.;:0:,,,. <;‘,.,,!;^,,-: -- .....,..•.,..,,, <,m••-,.. i:, ..000,00000„..,,,..4., , -.• .-.:.:.x..„.......... -,-,0,,,-q,,,,,.3,...,, • - - ••,rt4'cl,:f.T.:,':.,e.?4,-,...p70.1.-.6,,,,.,.,,,i-,,i,...e, , ominem: , „.i.,-;,,....., ...;•• . ,, ..00.000.00,. , -., ...:*i::*i::**::i:i:::i::::•..- ,,, ,,I...<-2.;-_-••• - -- _-4,-4,,..i.ii.,„-•(..,o.;reri .t.'::0••( .,•r' • .,, •ccP:.•••.;:,,:::erkv.rs•-•, 'c'-'"6.:;e'4• • ••:•:•:•:•:•:::::::::::::::::::::::,. ,,•.4..t..??:•,,,•,c,,, . , ,, i°,, - -----: • •rle,...:,./c•td.e :•• 1.•tr. ......;..'•••••• (i..-;../ii.• or,.: ,000• •••.\000. .'''...) ,...f...:,..f...'Zatj.. .1"•.°e ..S).1•i 01 't, 7.--.--,- '' ;.f.' i.......‘:.:t'' •;,.V, .000, 1.1+, 0001 .""."""" .•"••'' Rt.. ,.. ...:::::::':..::;::::: :::,,.' ",‘'". • • .....:...,:•,,I•' •••.'o,'ZI"I'}''. '. s, ' ',,,•OW. ., : C, -Is, •0 0• .‘"'.") 2 •,`','`,,1:',,11,k z„ , . ,,Ea N 0• , 4pJØ ' .•4‘.-4). ••,•-ci.‘• I . - •,,.-(,••44., • , • ••,.., • ..„,. ;•••„,-c,-0 '''.•12..::::;„..1:;,',:, .-:••••'..--•":.' :r•-•,-,c,2'''',;','..',..".-4?-.°*•'''....-• -4%;•,..- ''''..- • • -......cr, •... .. . ............... -. ...,,.. ... ..:•::::::, • -„,,,,....0.00.0.. \ Iiiiiii\1444w°111: ,'„ c , li\) '04 .o.....,..c,v.1.•,.i-4,'Al.)(I',6,,.'41, 0,•'13.•.N, ,3,,.E,z,'•,,,,..0,-kiii ry•c.T.,,,,I• • ‘',,,j,),..co••4e..6..140,,,,‘ ''7':','c'o,-•'i • , ‘,0:0000°00 oo.00'0.9300,. i!,,,...,,:,,::iz:._,;.e.:t;,...,7:,,,,•,:::3.:...;‘,...:.,,,:,,,..),..,..,, ,,•,r,0?0•, '0.''Vol.i,.-e,''+'<, a,,.. ,,•••••0,,,.,-..,•?..0.)5.,••o fp" -?. .-)--•,,':':,,"...:•:- .00.0000.0, '.":17.-1),A‘',i,1,1,;4,''.::.'",::::,,r..i‘t2,'•:,;0.:71.kN:"..).'"•,?\,..-,..::,.3:::::);':,:,,•(:: :',7•1:).::1..:: '' .':.3!:';':;q111:::'''''..;43:)::A.'.'.'aillIPS:•:)..,.).'v.';';1,!:..,i ..?c,0 "I.!%1/4.:•:::.;:::;..ri-),1:1);" c)•3 :•:•:•:•:•:.:•.•,:`. .---.. ,.., •""::.. ) o o ••:::::::,::::::::::::: :,. , , ',..:M:•:....:***:..• -',:-1 III" :.:::::•'.' ''.'..:::::::::.. •-, i ..0:070.0.• 2 ,0 ,. ..„.. 1,84,..„„en. ..,;...0,......,::. ..‘,,,L,. •,, ..0, , 3, ,..•••.''., .“ •.Vb '\.-?....!''k),,,• /..4,•, .,.27,,,..•-•,..-,,,,, ,, .„,,..•.„ , " . . f ,,,•,..,:.....„,i„,0..:).:,,,,,zi.,: .. 1,,.,..3.5.:.,:.:,.::,,..1. ,...,{::?-...!,'. .ei;,..1 j' • •() , -1.0.•S. ' II k: '1 V.''ill'.Yl.'..1.:4;'‘,' ,. • '"C IIIIIWAIIII - '.;•,•(,-;;cA.e-j.P.',...,, , ,>:',.,1111.!.- 4:\ ' .'.'. \kk . ., . . '1.:''"):;.:-..'."*P.,. 0..,',.:, '•,.." '...,.,,,0,,`,'„•...S1. I •%.r.lik k..._ ..1 000000 0000000 ,.„ ‘.0 •ki . ,000000• - N , \ ••• 000000, ,o00000 .' •.., ..0000,3 , - r . 1 so ihk t.„, . ..::,.....) _ A.,..,..... ., ...,...4 0......00.: • .,...;..., 1,11,1111, mil . O..... .•..... pa. 00..0, ).,),• „"it.... , .,"'..-a '.• , '',•,.., 1 i '.4 . 2.0 P000( 0000, 000 )0000 ‘000 ‘3000 •0000•. 000000*• •` •00000000i• tor',+,,, I..,.. , 000 0000, 00000000000•a . f. (6P 6 000000000Q .•0000000000000, 1,' „?...:?,...1 re . r ' . ).°00.00.. 00.000.0.0.... ., r • 9----' v.q.ov 0°. .• . IP , 000..00. 000 ...0.0 ,o)00....0.. 0.• ....000. „ .0.00000, ,.... ., :.. 00.000.. 1 AI I( ..i.44 d9.:••• ,l'V.,.41” . , . .....,.,c7 1 • . • 000 ••• 0, 0 i\ 0 0 0 0 0 0 00(p,, , .... - 0. •. \ '...,.. ' 111111111111130000 • Or ..000000000 0000, (1. '000000, • •••t eks, ,, •- '1,3._J...„•;-:,..7.,- .',. -.... '. • 1.ononrInfinn • L I • \ l t l u ° W . I ' •°t NE ;i la V ?��' W t e o ' ,' 'a , t,,i i I' 1i _�\ I—— ,T.1\ , a, ;rt+ t 1ez ,. N6Lrp1 �DS— ° I I ''''‘I aa,. ,"V _7I • ' . „ �\TW )f , _ --- ___._ O — s m : I A ..°.t:'.,E • .: I•4: 'I; , '',.'!: , . , _:. ! ;L+.4..!.. .‘ ,;"1" L., . ,,, —V !t_. ,, - 7 . tH + kLJEEEE �;:•I'_l��r to,,1l F.iion \ ... + o ,t • ' I irTJflLft1 1 I lir i I if lJ I I T4 —�1/4 i 1lli > > ,''• n ficit==i3 . mt i ,.k,... o 1rI .mot i �. r JOCAl low' , I 7` 1 1 I 7 C H O O L {____� I y ST 1-1 '�„ S -► II I I -. t i 1 1 2 i Q . . LQL ° P \. - F C7 I I D `' / % -tGE ENW OD I I' II/ • - _. 1 I 10.-- ' // / ® , / r u I i` — — • „� .' '. 1 tfi . . — h1 e No 7 I I< 1 _ I I 1 I I 5VINSEtr. Ii Rm�� . 'T I `�eo l 1 ;,..„! , I/,1 .; .., .l. . l,�l l f U ,. . 7 2• I - .t M I I - ,p ' L• /t ti `1 •iF .,?.1 pi ''''h.1, c? ,_,I ,, . /., 1 1 G-1 _ SERVICE CORPORATION OF WASHINGTON ^ ' SP-076-87 �v APPLICANTSERVICE CORPORATION OF WASHINGTONOTAL AREA APPROX. 13 ACRES PRINCIPAL ACCESS MONROE AVENUE N.E. EXISTING ZONING G-1 EXISTING USE CEMETERY . PROPOSED USE CEMETERY ' COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN PUBLIC/QUASI—PUBLIC COMMENTS THE APPLICATION TS FOR A SPRCTAT. PRRMTT FOB FIT•L AND GRADE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE EXTENSION OF AN EXISTING PERMIT (SP-048-85) WHICH WILL ALLOW COMPLETION OF FILL OPERATIONS AND RESTORATION OF THE SITE. THE WORK IS TO INCLUDE 142, 000 CUBIC YARDS OF REMOVAL AND 295, 000 CUBIC YARDS OF FILL. 6 b j • V1C--1i \—‘—` KA A.P I to I•II . I /it di I Y `cEr�n2 PA4Z1G 2voc.���o I•. f b)P,-s. 'cEc e-►ti I I 1 t ) . — v SZ fAwb-t1..b.NDs es/A o . 1 ��e. H �r STo — —`unimmommmiNt i roe, g i'_\ \.\ \\\ \ \ \ \\\W\ U- 5►„ GALS • c-�1 IrinU Ueeo Gw 1n 1 1-1 U ' 4 I J Harz j! ----- I / L.cyr , ,..: N , tl . \ * 4. g swoon tf' J" al a.PT 1/2Ill5 • \` PLO.--)EC_T \4 A i • w��z LQ ._/�.�1O�.1 \ 4 2 II PT 1/1/;; F1 St....1:::) • . . 4 ' RE... Tot.) C..(Tht_12T. . I I GUV►-Yrr I S1-4a P5 "------L......._. CITY O( 1-.5,7 ":� I Pi a BUILD1NG/ZONING DEPT& ,....rm. .,,C,,_Z.s_z I COU'TQ.1JC Tbl1.rrEQUE...cJCE • • h - LE.CELJO I �`�% •`'e'nw 0' o..MOO....n POawaeo .ar. .c.. cam im:�o.Co a . I s ti o 77. ..e.• • .r• ..r.aau-u•.omwow:.ea 0.....o P.O.. ..¢. f _ ` — y.... J I m .,..,ems/ /', ! I rl \`\`��, //e I ^sb.a ma s.c.." •a.....,...:.. �a .............. .u.m.a.o..�.wwd.. %/,,� ` l -4` 1 ' :1. ___"_ _ -.II: on o r PM b. 509. uu _-'�b•aar e.c ... fil N� ' /1 : �� I �� %�/ -- l II Af• ..m.aa :u..m.a ..saw/a...c......... SC1aLE 1=4.0‘• P. 'AAB,, '✓. ;I 1 /'' ~x p 1 IIIII . .,.�. .�.�..a:..a...n. /Y / / r.,f 1 �/ �� l l oil l e /i/ ;41',- / /�, �I r l ///��I i•/Illil , u.5.•_ e 0 , 0• %i,,. ;, ' , ' - /I i Ill( ` t I L. III! ; ; _ II;It < •.Y/ l,r'� - 1 I III ® 1 1 -:: ~`'i �=/1 L III I i•,Ad/ �-=j��/ r / / 1 Ii•1 . ` n ✓. ,yi�, •;,/ / ' i•Q11\ _�%r 11113 IIII.. .......�... ......ae.m �/ :� i- i -\ \\ -— r^ IIII ......e. em..eo.mrao, i' 1 a „sue /�/ j / %� / / --- X. /� �- 1/r,,1,,II'r d(� �` . g }. r ,ee` i... � •:,.i/.. )=• l'i, Z� r. 0 1,,I r r _\a: � , ' • •--�-- II,Pp I7f1 �.� w-=k .�.. %t t I,1,'iu191( ^off.���\N. 1\ D` �f • au�. ....a....0 _.__/,,' -- ii � \ I. C� II ./ �'/ii iVIIlil II, T'QENC4 DETAIL V e~ m...owm....a.. VIU4L.,i-CU LI Y FELICE I fI vw.. `i/i�3 I; '- / jl /1 ill: 'EC.eo • . 1t1 ..ate • 4 J• / i I/I Illl• llil }. 1 • -ZT-------if— „ - - IIP: ,`d1 --_J - ,, ., a I� ,ice -_ — II,/l�%f. - — moms. r',�—...�C�..::e — 1A .n —� \ /a ma.�me 1 / \.wooroo 1 — 41 V R ernv,a.vn.se:a., ��. .s.v .ra..0 COOT. .s e.a. o�vo oh/G1ia. � � .a.tu+ma. . 1w..s .ew.a. :.t{ .m.Y) a..0 a..m —�_ / J/ — SEC. AA . Iga I 0.0431 ....maw. ...GOO .'..e..'........c....e e. ...:r-o -' u .a Yor PHASE II � �. icrr— • JOHN R.EWING MD ASSOCIATES -_ +,- SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL�4, am--- - CAM oc.moCI-LAIRD.,w.c,an ?.•' 7i'�• } -2 : A-8-07 q. i R1�E MM.w11pniaoroll (2pp,p,_0.,, r'C`..t� 1, GREENWOOD CEMETERY KW IC Y�O oulaMlo SI MIM I n CHCCKCO Ef •�E�' sue.calm,+. .[� • • • 1171•O° ann ann ■en FILL,GRADE 9 RESTORATION ..lino. 131.10114.I R dxmmiO mn 1 BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING March 1, 1988 APPLICANT: Service Corporation of Washington FILE NUMBER: SA-076-87 LOCATION: Property located south of S.W. 7th Street and east of Oakesdale Ave. S.W. A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: The applicant seeks approval of a Special Permit for Fill and Grade to allow the extension of an existing permit (file SP-048-85) . This permit is to allow the completion of fill operations and restoration of the site. The applicant proposes to remove 107, 000 cubic yards of existing material and place 295, 000 cubic yards of new fill material on the subject property. B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record: Service Corporation International 2 . Applicant: Service Corporation of Washington 3 . Location: 350 Monroe Avenue N.E. 4. Existing Zoning: G-1, General Use 5. Existing Zoning in the Area: G-1, General Use; R-3 , Residential - Multiple Family; T, Trailer Park; and L-1, Light Industrial. 6. Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Public/Quasi Public. 7. Size of Property: +/- 13 . 10 acres 8. Access: Monroe Avenue N.E. 9 Land Use: The site is part of the existing Greenwood Cemetery and is currently being used as a gravel pit. 9. Neighborhood Characteristics: North: Mortuary/Cemetery East: Greenbelt/Multiple Family South: King County District Court/City of Renton. Shops West: Undeveloped Property BUILDING AND ZONING PARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT I THE HEARING EXAMINER March 1, 1988 Page 2 C. HISTORICAL/BACKGROUND: Action File Ordinance Date Annexation 2249 June 22 , 1966 Special Permit Fill & Grade SP-051-80 -- July 11, 1980 Special Permit Fill & Grade SP-019-84 -- August 1, 1984 Special Permit Fill & Grade SP-048-85 -- October 28, 1985 D. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1. Utilities a. Water: Not applicable. b. Sewer: Not applicable. c. Storm Water Drainage: Percolates directly into soil which eventually goes into iground water to Cedar River. 2 . Fire Protection: Provided by the City of Renton as per ordinance requirements. 3 . Transit: Not applicable. 4 . Schools: Not applicable. 5. Recreation: Not applicable. E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1. Section 4-704, General Use (G-1) . 2 . Section 4-732, Mining, Excavation and Grading. 3 . Section 4-722 (B) , Special Permits. F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT: 1. Northeast Renton Plan, City of Renton, Comprehensive Compendium, March 1986, pp. 55-60. 2 . Mining, Excavation and Grading Ordinance, Title 4, Chapter 23 . 3 . Well Field Protection Study, August 1984. G. DEPARTMENT' ANALYSIS: 1. The applicant, Service Corporation of Washington, is requesting a fill and grade permit to excavate a total of 107, 000 cubic yards of material (sand and gravel) and to place 295, 000 cubic yards of fill material on the subject property. The fill and grade permit covers work on approximately 13 acres of property located in the southwest and southeast corners of the Greenwood Cemetery. The fill and grade site activity has been divided into two phases under past applications. Activities proposed under this permit will be addressed according to the appropriate phase. BUILDING AND ZONING PARTMENT PRELIs"TNARY REPORT 1_ I'HE HEARING EXAMINER March 1, 1988 Page 3 The permit application includes correcting work done under previous applications for Phase I (west pit) , the possible removal of 107, 000 cubic yards of material for Phase II (east pit) , and the restoration of both west and east pits to grades shown on project plans. The applicant proposes to complete the work within two years should this permit be approved. 2 . The Environmental Review Committee reviewed this application at its regular meeting on December 16, 1987, and subsequently reconsidered the first determination at their meeting on February 3, 1988, and issued a revised Determination of Non-Significance- Mitigated with the following conditions: a. That the applicant work with the City of Renton Police Department and the Public Works Department to determine acceptable haul routes. b. That the applicant contact the Seattle/King County Health Department to ensure that the fill material to be placed on the site is properly inspected and tested to ensure that it is acceptable and poses little or no risk to the City's drinking water supply. c. That the fill material contain only minor amounts of organic substances and shall have rock or similar irreducible material with a maximum dimension no greater than eight (8) inches in diameter pursuant to City ordinance. d. That the fill material not contain soluble poisons or other leachable compounds (including all petroleum based substances including distillates and asphalt) which may have the potential for contaminating the City's drinking water. e. That the applicant contract with an EPA approved testing lab to monitor the site and to provide monthly reports on the types of fill material being deposited on the site and the results of leachate monitoring tests. NOTE: Such tests shall be carried out at least four times a year and shall include analysis for heavy metals, petroleum distillates and other probable contaminants. The results of these tests will be transmitted to Ron Olsen, Utility Engineer, Renton Department of Public Works and Greg Bishop, Environmental Control Section, Seattle/King County Health Department. f. That the applicant provide at least two monitoring wells on site (one uphill and one downhill) that go down to the hardpan. g. That the applicant replace the vegetation in the 30 foot setback along the eastern and • southern boundaries of the site with similar species of equal size. h. That the ' applicant post a $5, 000 cash bond for street cleaning. BUILDING AND ZONING PARTMENT . PRELIMINARY REPORT THE HEARING EXAMINER March 1, 1988 Page 4 i. That the hours of operation be from 8: 00 a.m. to 4: 00 p.m. Monday through Friday, 10: 00 a.m. to 6 p.m. on Saturdays for entire site; 7: 00 p.m. to 10: 00 p.m. Monday through Friday for Phase I only. . j . That the applicant provide vehicle cleanup facilities including wheel wash down areas and sedimentation ponds on-site in addition to the existing concrete apron. 3 . Under Section 4-2303 (2) of the Mining and Grading Ordinance, seven criteria are established to determine whether the excavation or filling operation is compatible with existing and future land uses. The following analysis demonstrates that the special permit should be granted if certain conditions are placed upon the proposal: a. Size and location of activity: As noted above, the activity proposed under this application is a continuation of existing fill and grade activity that has occurred on the southwest and southeast portions of Greenwood Cemetery during the last ,few years. The proposed activity will have minimal impacts on adjacent uses except algng the eastern boundary of the project. This part of the project is near existing multiple family uses and a mobile home park. Through mitigation measures imposed by the Envionmental Review Committee, the impacts should be minimized particularly with respect to construction noise and activity. b. Traffic volume and patterns: The applicant proposes to limit the number of truck trips to 60 trips per day as per Council decision on the previous application (SP-048-85) . The following provides an approximation of the number of truck trips required to complete the work proposed under this permit: Excavation - Phase II: 107, 000 cu.yd. / 14 (cu.yd per truck) = 7, 643 trucks loads 7, 643 trucks/303 (approximate work days per year) =25 trips/day 7, 643 trucks/455 (days over period of 1.5 years) =17 trips/day Fill - Phase I: 142, 000 cu.yd. / 14 (cu.yd. per truck) = 10, 143 truck loads. The number of truck trips (round trips) would vary with the length of the permit as follows: 10, 143 trucks/303 (approximate work days per year)=33 .5 trips/day 10, 143 trucks/455 (days over period of 1.5 years) =22. 3 trips/day BUILDING AND ZONING PARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT 1- THE HEARING EXAMINER March 1, 1988 Page 5 10, 143 trucks/606 (days over period of 2 years) =17 trips/day Fill - Phase II: 153,000 cu.yd. / 14 (cu.yd. per truck) = 10,929 trucks The number of truck trips (round trips) would vary with the length of the permit as follows: 10,929 trucks/303 ( approximate work days per year)=36 trips/day 10,929 trucks/455 (days over period of 1.5 years) =24 trips/day 10,929 trucks/606 (days over period of 2 years) =18 trips/day The chart shows that the applicant should be able to complete their operation within the two year limit of this application should it be approved. The applicant is not sure whether or not materials will be extracted from the Phase II pit. Therefore depending upon whether the extraction occurs, the number of daily trips could be less than 60 per day. In fact, it might be possible for the applicant to complete restoration work of the pits before the permit expires. In any case, the applicant should spread the truck trips over the entire two years in order to minimize the negative traffic impacts which could result if the operation period was cne year or less. As discussed with other fill and grade applications which use the N.E. 3rd N.E. 4th Street corridor, this corridor is becoming congested during peak hour periods. This is especially true during the afternoon peak traffic period between 3 : 00 p.m. and 7: 00 p.m. One of the mitigating measures of the Determiniation of Non-Significance issued by the Evironmental Review Committee, was to limit the hours of operation to 8: 00 a.m. to 4 : 00 p.m. and 7: 00 p.m. to 10: 00 p.m. Monday through Friday with work hours on Saturday from 10: 00 a.m. to 6: 00 p.m. The evening work hours are only for activity in the Phase I portion of the project site. The applicant proposes to limit truck traffic to the N.E. 3rd/N.E. 4th Street corridor unless a delivery • would be made to a residential area. Public Works did not comment on this proposed traffic pattern however the Environmental Review Committee as part of their review required the applicant to work with the City of Renton Police and Public Works Departments on acceptable haul routes. c. Screening, landscaping, fencing and setbacks: Previously approved applications for fill and grade activity on the site have had a requirement to maintain a 30 foot buffer along the perimeter of the the pits. These setback areas are to be landscaped either with natural landscaping or ornamental landscaping as approved by City's landscape planner. The past operations togther with the drought last summer has destroyed some of the vegetation in the setback areas. As part of the environmental mitigation measures the applicant is to replace the vegetation in the setback areas adjacent to the east WILDING AND ZONING -TPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT THE HEARING EXAMINER March 1, 1988 Page 6 and south property lines with similar species of equal size. As required in the previous permit, the landscaping does not need to be site obscuring but should be in an amount which softens the affect of the site from adjacent properties. Once the grading work is completed, the site will eventually be landscaped with lawn and ornamental vegetation. To ensure that the plantings in the 30 foot setback are maintained, the applicant should provide the City with a bond in an amount to be determined with the City's landscape planner, which is sufficient to--, ensure that the plantings will be watered and maintained. With respect to fencing, the Environmental Review Committee as part of the Determination of Non- Significance-Mitigated has required that the applicant continue to have a fence around the fill site. The fence is to be site obscurring. d. Unsightliness, noise and dust: The impacts of the project with respect to unsightliness have been mitigated through the requirements of the Determination of Non- , Significance-Mitigated with respect to requirements for landscaping and site obscurring fencing and street cleaning bond. The applicant will provide a rocked construction entrance in addition to the existing concrete apron to minimize the possibility of tracking debris off-site. A temporary hose bib will be located adjacent to the rocked entrance will provide additional help in removing debris from trucks. Noise will continue to be generated by bulldozers and dump trucks should this application be approved. The applicant projects that the fill and grade activity will take approximately two years from the date of approval. The noise impacts of this project will be somewhat mitigated by the hours of operation and the fact that for a portion of the project life, the noise may be somewhat reduced by the fact that work will occurr in the pit which is below ground level. However, as the operation nears the top of the pits and restoration work is finalized, noise from construction equipment may very well become a source of annoyance and irritation to persons living in nearby residential developments. The applicant should keep equipment well tuned and if necessary take measures to muffle equipment noise. Finally, the applciant will control dust onsite by periodic watering of the site. e. Surface drainage: Surface water is to be accumulated on-site and allowed to percolate to the lower ground water levels. This site is in the aquifer protection area. The applicant's project narrative states that both pits have cut into the aquifer which is the primary source of drinking water for the City. BUILDING AND ZONING PARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT To THE HEARING EXAMINER March 1, 1988 Page 7 The applicant retained a geotechnical consultant. The consultant's report has been submitted with the application. In the report, the consultant included a discussion of drainage for the site and raised concerns that before the drainage system (previously approved) can be installed, the site will need to be filled. Therefore, interim measures will need to be used to control surface water and siltation into the aquifer. The applicant proposes the following measures: A temporary measure to prevent siltation as fill is brought in and graded and surface drainage guided in one direction, will be to use straw bales placed along the toe of the fill. The bales will be raised as the level of fill rises. On a permanent basis the applicant proposes a storm draianage/infiltration system to recharge the aquifer. Phase I will have a closed system where surface water, after being passed through an oil/water separator, will enter a twelve-inch perforatedd pipe whose trench will contact the exposed aquifer. Phase II will provide a pipe/basin system whose trenches will also contact the aquifer, but eventually will tie into a system to the south. All basins in both phases will have an oil/water separtor. Provisions will need to be made for the periodic maintenance of these facilities in order to ensure proper operation over the life of the system. These measures together with measures to ensure clean fill is placed in the pits (as required by the Environmental Review Committee) comply with the suggestions made by the geotechnical engineer. f. Use of Site: The site will be used as a additional burial space for the Greenwood Cemetery. 4. As noted above, a portion of the work proposed under this permit involves correcting work already done in the Phase I pit. The geotechnical consultant's report states that the fill soils appear variable in composition. Test pits showed that there were occurrences of highly organic soils together with wood waste, concrete debris and some . asphalt chunks. Occassionslly, cobble or boulder-sized material was present. In addition, the consultant found the sidewalls of trenches being dug to be unstable. The consultant's report concluded that the soils in their present condition would not be suitable for future uses of the property including cemetery uses. This work should be approved by the City's consultant, CH2MHILL; to ensure sufficient protection of the City's aquifer. 5. Various City Departments have reviewed and commented upon the project. Their comments are attached for review. One of the comments from Design Engineering states that ground water monitoring wells should be installed once the City decides how, where and who will coordinate and direct the program. The Environmental Review Committee has had a presentation by a representative of CH2MHill, the consultant for studies on the City's aquifer and well system, on the matter of ground water monitoring wells. To date the matter has only been discussed among City staff without a specific plan of action being adopted. Part of the reason for this is that past pit operators have decided to go it alone. BUILDING AND ZONING --PARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT THE HEARING EXAMINER March 1, 1988 Page 8 6. The subject proposal as modified by the mitigating measures of the Determination of Non-Significance- Mitigated and the recommended conditions of approval of this permit appears to be in the public interest since the proposal will complete the filling of the pits and rehabilitate the site. H. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION: Based upon the above analysis, it is recommended that the fill and grade application for Service Corporation of Washington, file SP-076-87, should be approved subject to the following conditions: 1. That the applicant comply with the mitigating measures of the Determination of Non-Significance -Mitigated issued for the project. 2 . That the applicant install a temporary hose bib adjacent to the rocked entrance for washing debris from the trucks before entering ,City streets. 3 . That the applicant take measures to keep vehicles well tuned and if necessary take measures to muffle equipment noise. 4. That the applicant spread the number of truck trips over the two year period of the permit. 5. That the applicant provide the City with a bond in an amount sufficient to ensure that the plantings in the 30 foot buffer are maintained and the replacement of plants which die. 6. The applicant's plans for rehabilitating the site being approved by CH2MHill. r 'L_�, I I�Itt1 +1tIL.L��a I f 0 .ilVyi�' —. l O , 1'-1 �' �i',e R—1 R-2 L 1 ' 1I ll \1 I-- • ,. I . _N[E. .,r� .t" , 43 .• ;'>Y=-'+ ' ., N C „to./ rr- , I it )I• f •.,,•.,;tilt j+nn��\.. ;,J"" j f_ W1 • N 6tr01 ,.. :�1f -1 1 i :..�' I,l o i `!' !-a i ' -r O • l f ` • I r Z •yam W—iJ�c_ — --- n 7 r 1 rr"� �t�r.�L'1.• ���•re n tt as_f�. =1�1 iI•n l�•1t�t,et ,:a r o • ,t I —t,l �' 1 1—ter. t�°� to T— b' e I ' — .'t 1 1 •R- ly - ! 1 I I ,m� s. .-. .s� rr+ 1 I , , )q( (� 7 I I i. , 4 ry - 5,.ry 1 1 U • - , ilt4-70,1. A't—A -.7004C i --: 1 l , . ,... , ,,,,f,,,, . .„, , es,:,;..., .., ,• F ' . I I I ;op; ,3. , PI El Rlnl,�,, 1 in, 1 1� I I ✓OC A-1 1OM( I . 1 T .- P I 7 5CHOOI ��� I 1 i ! q isFLI\ I 1 I -- 2 1 + _I R.. — - ; . I G I. 1 •OD I I ,/ t.._ I I 1 i �1 ,� ,/ Y, :t, l .T R'" 1 j • ' r G—4 L_. . R-3a a // . I 1 4 • ' -- - ---• k„, � S p It r 77' I r' / . 'ill t .- IL r r r _ :.1 46`. - ... .- I 4,i/Hr Aiiim't L,..-A,. .__ __.,,.,...".t, •. 4::it./ ._ 1._ . N2 No g , F I I 4. 1li . .� rYy " 1 I 1 - i. . torcivp ,, ,,.. .._....: (I I 1111R®9 yo I I„I,r 1,1,.� . I ,7 I i U -- t , r. ,0 tt iiviTi, ,--t silt . , , . - 11- .,... - 1 'fi , ...., , „ , ..../.., I. I, , I7 '7•I • -lr' �7 /r _. 1 I G—9 SERVICE CORPORATION OF WASHINGTON � 1 SP-076-87 ��! • I' APPLICANTSERVICE CORPORATION OF WASHINGTONOTAL AREA APPROX. 13 ACRES PRINCIPAL ACCESS MONROE AVENUE N.E. EXISTING ZONING G-1 EXISTING USE CEMETERY PROPOSED USE CEMETERY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN PUBLIC/QUASI-PUBLIC COMMENTS THE APPTLTCATIQN TS FOR A SPFCTAT, PF.RMTT FOP YT7.L AND GRADE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE EXTENSION OF AN EXISTING PERMIT (SP-048-85) . WHICH WILL ALLOW COMPLETION OF FILL OPERATIONS AND RESTORATION OF 1. • THE SITE. THE WORK IS TO INCLUDE 142 , 000 CUBIC YARDS OF REMOVAL AND 295, 000 CUBIC YARDS OF FILL. , . . LAN") USE PLEMENT „„ -- - I , 17 Single Family 1 lllll IR Commercial .,. ..c,„•3:-•--,,,,..---i-rz--..,Ci. 9 9 i '' ,.%.r..5....•.....,?i7-...,;,:::-',..;,i.,...--. Scale 1 1111160.%-`L- .:...•::'.:•;;..' ,-,.,-,..,:.:::. •.. . ri Low Density Office / Office Park ( - • --..-•:. _ Multi-Family ....000. 0.0..... --... I ,,..ii ]:::ii::i:iii:•:ii: Medium Density ioc,0000.0.: ,00.0000. IIIi Multi-Famoly ,.0.00.0.00.0o... ....,.... ,00.00.0.• Pubiic/Quasi-Pubilc • , auf.t•ti'0 <•;-?. X.e5' High Density .......- ....... Light industrial' ,::,::-. ....:::k:•:-. filuiti-Family oos000a cul..n_asuvr . .. . 1 -Vi •• . Recreation ,,c :0 0 0 , Rjeavy industrial 000' Heavy 'o o o L ' , .•,.,.. '-—Pt Irimilli .*.C. NUNN •••,,,•:tirlate' 10- :;.'•,...-,,- I * • ' '• '• ii ilia'i:i:i:i:::::'•1121111 ' /-', -, •,''':J:-,..-'•-....' Greenbelt 0, ilflanufacturing Park ,..,•••,.. - .11::::11 .i::-•: •iii...110 • :,-• ...!•L•Y;'c':,!-,:' ' 4 "hi' 4i:RI ."ol .••, - - - / Muitipie Option '•,' Kai& •giisiga wi ,;.'. ,, ..... ... ,-, •• - - — - - a;',-.1 '" - --7 " --•,:,'•••••::,7•:: ••••:•:•:•:.i-7,-,,.-=';:, • -- • , 1::.::::::*:i;i•Nii.W , .00000°.°0v -...;‘, '' e 0 co e 01471,...d\ V 7-.111111 .- iii::ii::::....:7.a....-,i.....apri:i:. ii.v0.0.000000.0.0.: •,-,,,,,,..: . /00. . . . . o., •-,. , :,i,:,:,•:::,:,:,:, bp:. : -i...,_-_,..::::::::m Atfirg4111.,,1 . ii..., Ilimail 0 0,00.0.0.000f00.1 •cr;77,,f,,,, • 0..0.0, -'-•v')0 0 c, 0 0 4 0 0 f-,), •-• •ii:ii:: :7-A-i-k,,,iirVi. Iti .- .4 , \ it mai .... .:‘,,„:000.0.83.......0:00.0.0.00.1 1 :::::,..400ri •00.000.0000, • ,.......i............... ) -'•,.)'.,'2' o e 0 0 ••> 0 •0 0 .0''...,-1 :'::':'::::: • ,_ ein.i..; •:::. RIM )— ' ooeo000\_00 , .in:i:i:i t . s•iii::::::Alitgl?..„; pr . ......-.-...........i 6 0 0 0 r.. 0 0 0 Ci :•i, r. limn \0 0 0 . , , ikm Tagil,ti,g3 ir 1ft' 1 - =ME 1 0000 ° 0000 '''',1, ,':::::::::::7 * I 4 V,, 00000000, 00 ' . „•::::::::i:, I •t.)' I . 000 - 00 \000 ,i '*::i:. ' O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0, 0 0 e•,•2', •::iir 7,--.7.....Q.E.,- 4. 0000001000 ,;!,, , .:ImmEm \ (6:::c.,.o0o.• O 000000000• 0', ' ' '''.1111111 ,...4 400106‘ 1• 0: 2 4 0 6'•rt, L• IMIIIIIr re......°0°,:,pill ....::::::.:•.. -,•,., oeeooe . 000e :•, ,,. . 1 .n.‘,. .000..,80, 000 . 000000 ,„0 „k: .11,..L,..:ie 00.leo_to. 0. ........... • .... ... co 0 . 00 , 0 . 0000 .1•••.; \ ....o.o. ...o.oo -•••-•• ,:- ,....,.!'" 0 0 0 000 0 ''••.,',.\‘` \ -1kmall iir -- D . •••",,' 1 010°0°G °0' ',C1':'4,\ir . ow ,. ...000...ar.1 ..:.:•:::::::... ..::::::::::::::.,:::::w::::::.:..... . , ,, ..:..::.:.:.:.i::.:. .:emiiiiio..ii:::iiiiii:i:::.. .••00 .: ..,c,0000,60 , ,,31 s\, Alp t: ...oz. .,0• .... --.'=...",--- -•-•''''.. ' %.,r-t . 4p, n An n n 0 • u,„4' ••:::::::, ICii*'' ''`'A''''1:111. 0.-..0''0 s'0''0 1.V,,i la . 16/1114.11 ',C.....°O. dagnanina 4/8M.1.‘' _ fr•-•tr.t. :I."N*111 • 0 0 0 0 ° /4 VA, 1 .:ii:.: 1 ,D 1W---z... .r..; ;;,,einE, ,, 0 q 6 ,f,,, • o•o o. ..........-...:•:•:•:•:.:.:.::::::::.:.:., ogee 1, min i, sa i, 'i:;::::::::::::., 11111b 0,mit o o e,,,o o q If/ [0.0•o 00, •::•::f::•:**:::::::::::::i:'::::::::::::::, viestiq rintin . 11111 , 'Q '0• 0) '31 47 irfovssi.,,v 10_,§„, , ,::::::::::::::::M• ,.0......°0°0,,,i::::::::,:::.:.:: :•.:::.....:::.,, ,,,:thci•••••ei, k% _ _ . „„:.:.::_:.::„.imaw,. , '? oink, A •••' . '• I N , (ai 4111 -.- • ' ' r--.---,...,.:.:.:.t.'*- . ' ,'' iirmrolii iliiiilai". l' -'0.21. 0,.... 1" '''''''''''.100Sow 11119) 1 ..wi...r.,i6,,N,----iilstit..----.7.:0.,c,.'1,ffle - i,... .,, -----. ,4`....e.-.77:7: :.::-:---.:...--..- --,:iiiii-ty•0•••••0-_:_•, ,-- --.,.....i..i,:..,:, „..:-.111..p...mi::;: ,.... •-141 1111 - ......:. lis Fi, )0,.e. ::::ii:i:::i0:::::i:i:i::::'%1 ...-..0.8"o%,---'''..,'DociiociinVo°0°. , i MN FP -,.:', .....' -:‘ i 'tilt, ",1,,N;, . ...51* - .:::::i:X:::::i:•:•- -'...:.:.:::::: .0.00000000000000000...0,000000000000000.0,; ..;Ill!Uri ill ,;i:::::.:::i::•::::::•:::::;•::*:.1.:::::::::::.:::i.::.::::.:::::,...::::.::::::*:::*::::•:::::::.:::::::::::::::1:.:::::.::::.:.:: ',,.,;ill al ILI!',..... *\.M129f1 419.!j! gkir,* S.14%;:.1.4,.., *::ii!:.:.** .....:::::.i.::ii.i:i.•.::i 00000000000.00000.0,,0,.00000000.000000..; gaiii:;•.:.„:IWO!! .:iii ::.Mi g: iiiiiMi:::. 1 i'•8•1 %Irtlirtiri • fr;,..;likiik,:.,..i.N\\• .. ...::::::i:::::i:i:i:i:i:i::::::::i.000000000 ,,,„..0.0.....,. : ..„. ••••••••••-,::::::::::::::::::::::.:.:*i::i:i::.i:i:iiiiiii:ii:i:i:i:m*::i::.::::.,:, Ilik'''.fil' ,••.. '°•,'•i>,•":7'"'' •te ' '•::::::::::::::::::::::*i*i:i:i:i:,.°0°0°0°0°AcTo%•„,,o o -i,.:0',„le'•, .,:•.;: 0 0," .;:i:::::::::•:.,, •••••:.:.:•:•••••,.....s...• •......••••• ...i ilostpi ill •• ‘•)., ..':• ,,,,•,,' i:::,..Mi:::•:::?.i.:::•::•::u 0 000 000000000000 ., 1)%, „....,,,,iot,,, 1:::::::.. 0000( . ..6.,., . . ti 4. III! ..4,11: Ilr, AI l.•4I161,6z1i15.::i.:k 10i1s1 6.t11.M,4,, IRkWkeFuiMiniyrrAi uim nie-s.t.s,.o.orlel.ris. i7,,,,'....%k,,1a4m11 l ',loiiI re...0,00 0 .f:,t:::::.*.i::**::ii:::i:::::*::i*:i:*:::ii:::ii:::i:::::::•:::::•:::::::..::..00%00000%00 0000 00 000 0•00 0.000,0(0-•0...0,..'a,,0••0(•.0.A..._.)0 ;:,t..,.:,:,,,:.::A:•:.::;1•:.:::•.:.,: :,:••::.,:.•0..• •. .:1- 0 : 000000000, 01 I - • a llIll'...07 I •0000•000' 111111111O6-• -ciz, r e 0 0 0 0•0,0.0.* , IMINIIIIIMilili'Vr-,'C'i•C' .,.4,,. .:,.,c,,:. **; f '.°°°° I&. ::::::::::::::::::::::•:::.: , ".,-,', , t ,r'..,ski G, :..,..,.:::.:::.:: .•,;,. . -•IIIIMMIIMOND:,, . i ,..,...Mt ' . .............. ..•wientimardj• • e.7.',i.,•';' 1 AL.•••,..... N..,'.<, '.,';','... , •::::::::::::::::::::::::::: " V000006010......:....:.:•:•: ,VONSIBIPIP,di it.00.0,;.."..".„.... .... Airi ,,,,.p., ...\:; ',..1 .:i*:i:i*i;i:::::•:.: ''gralig:3111.9)°:", .. 'Aie C.) \1 :::::::::::::::::M: .'‘,.3 1r''J "•'.•••••' .... '...••r 2-- '.,'.•:•:•'.....••• • t, ' :•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•::::::::' •,•• •3:.cz.5;(-?:•e—- . ', e•-•„':•.''..-..:::::::::::::: 1,..5),), . .1,1 2 5:12!'PUT,"r :,••;.,,.••. "•.. kall•4:', • •'1;'; '''''''''.... ;.3.'r.>" :.'"'-,n•"r):r..:.''.:-:•-:'u:.'30`:'.3."- :::::•::::::::::::::::: ' • ,seerieft'girl 'i-P.;„1,., A.'• .• ' .‘•••,;,;,,,,, ,ft.. ',„•!••),,t,0:, c;',/,,,,,. •,•;,•••.,„9 z 0...,C,';r.d.,•, .,:,69,a.,- ••:•:•:•:•:•:::•:•:•:: M , .1::14t•d:::1 ',',:.),;,j1.: .•-liSc7,1,Zi%:•gs.(-0' 6,:,,,,. .11;,',;;,%:.'-',r...32.'•,•.?;:,..P.,•••a-,'w;),,,,Y,,e,361,:q3'1:-/".;:r;,° .-?•,:`>'..,.. ..:::i.::.;•:.: :•:.:•;.: .cb. ` .-isa tree, • ;,..''•'•,',i'• •••117:'&71.4-Vg, iiib*--'4.‘-',;•‘ "'-'),::''''';(5`.;•':, •n' " ''''''';''.,:'<;'y,-'•••)•e,./4e'r:`-.4.., '''''::': .6'.: '• , I laisig' 1" \ :,:,..;:, ,',. ',kex&v..„ ,12.1,,,..„....-.:.,...„,•,•,,,,,,.. ,..$):,,...,,,.‘5;,!, _ ,4.1,„,,,,, __ . , ., :,ij,,,:,. ..,... : , , 'mil' : i —01..;•t. •-,c.••,, is - ummi k '•','et:. -••••••, -'•'•,:• •-•,'••• •:, (;40 , *mut • ••' ' ••'•— •Y.. 0".ceti. '.'• -, - .' •':.',.?:.,"?.<3'. . - 1 .• '., ibli' 7 , 1 kV i p , .„.a . . .4, Ii....i.lk•-•''':', ...t,/-",N,.:1111111P1110> -0.!,..c;;f4,-,'...-% '..:,'-.,'''.'-''2:-,'n.i';'-:(1'.- n e,e).,, •• , r?:. •,t, 41. ••-' `In.i._.s••_ . ' ir, -I"-CT*.?'ie.,76•47 y.,;...,c 41. '')..,r;S., ' I' Ily If • ...to , *.'•:•%/%1.'/"'/A''1;1' ,.;s1,-,•ii.e'.);.'ta:',1.?"(4.1) .,..',.. '''„., .{5.1'..Sp.i..cyc'.:.t.jr•srs.,A,',•,. •,(.;%••,:,_:•,;•41,1.•,:;'e,i.,z1i:s?,.,.,,!,,:t..,,,,1•0.,,;.i•i;...',.v.157,°,,....1:;,,,"'1..5,%;' );.'1::•1;),,- .4*,.:le,.', ...--/N- 4111111k..:Cn.;w?4••••!.''-'r..,t*"?`.9r( kag‘'t(14-.‘*':•••:•.6 •••-.* --C''' • 'awii w s :.. .0000 0, :..',( `',,tr,\,••003.i !.'''.ek•-;"•'`.- ..'' ' ' --•'-.- --' 'r'1.)--"' 'e C494"; .g;*s'C''5:1.4.-6:' I '''`''.'"' '- , 0000. „.,..;;;„,•zo; 0•••,,',,,,5`:Eiss,::,•,',`'',"0, e4;.'"'' ' ... :''':..',:,... C..!,.:•,-Y,r>;:(.k,.:'el.,...refk,•••('•eK6 67\ ..".j.;,0•:.,:....,-1-,',' ....•0.. ..0,,,,,,,-..,,,,,c?,,,,„c,„.., ..,•,.,„;,......,„.;•., •,..„, e• r.••!,;,- • . ‘,„.0.,,..to c•;&re."0',51711Q E..-,.....„ ',,;,..;:., r, ,c, , nr.,ell e.-- • '\ --7%,A-f."%f s',,'. rn';c:'s+r"'i.fr ,.L 0 ',.. .',2• , :' ',.'.,::::,,,,,..71,•.;i.,•••,.:...•:,7:• ,.;• I •1," • .oo 9 n.4,-,•• •• . . *,,,\`' -• • ••Os'CO:' ?'" ,lri...t.'c's: . •,,,!'•,.,,.'s•,,`'St..'?..it,n.0' (v. :,r7....p.' •••,‘, ;',.•. .0 0„.•.,., ..,,,,',,•Pi '' -!,e6 , .,....0„.„. 4 LY ,, , , „,,,c,ei:J.:2.r.,",...-',f;•,,9.:cc. 61 •'''..,°*q:•••1 .,(•'.'-'•-;;',,•£"; ••0••i.);,..••'ea *r.•''-?,c''.••,. l'..'.";L'i••,':1 '•,' • ;.. if '•' I'••••'i,.1 • .4.1-••••e•. ,.,..... ,, , ., „.. ,,0, • ci•0:.0-1,• -,••.,"? . ,"5 ,} 0 '• 't• '''''''''p '''. 're- .- 4-Pt;7:"''';'• "("- - -'-'''' ' ' , .., t)c:.1,0-1'r,,,,,-'<O.,'•,..,.'•cF.s'-1...?". 1.:..''c'',11.....E;.tii,'*s.); -:)0',,°^1.'1: t -... •'*.p.r 4 r '!...•k;•eip ----___:_.----•- . 0. . - 'IL •/••::::•iiii::•::::••'•''4?....•:•'•0•,•*•''',... ;.-'••'`'`,.:•:,..,.;,•:•Yi:,1..i',,- ;',J3%,"1." - '•;•;;V:,`,,';''.,'i•?:::,,c).'.,)4z,,,,s,..;‘.:1,',,,,,i,,,i,:;),,,,:,:0,•(:,p. I re' ' ---..-,:, ...iusl.g`v.14),.e.,.‘.-..c- - .f.„.. .p.„-e41,,,$\,-,e,.- ....,.c..,:...il.,c,........!.c.:;.,0,:. •;.•i••,,e;•••4,C;•-•• • '''' . p!"..;: iiiiiiiiOiii .11 ..?.‘,."•p,',.. ..'s-: ,..:).! ....00v0.00%. ',;:iP,,,',:`,,` ' '•::::•;:i:i,::.:i:i'.:t.":7:::!.. :',.s%'•':(E`:;..3,':::, k.." ..-:n,,tipt...c:1•41t g.l'et,.(••;•eyo-c',C;.r:•4,:, 1 A:,:,:,:,:,:,:„,„„:,:„,::,:,:„::::. . .,..,,.,...„,,,.,• . ..000 0...00• : ..::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.. ,,,:‘, 0.7,.,.. ;•, •,„,...( ,-.,,,,,.. -... ,,..c.0x.,,,,„4:..c ..„.... ,..1.c..............:...............::..i......:::................i..i.i...::::....ii...ii.....:„,..,,..,:.,:.2::':.:,:,i n...!., :::,:,0, itk4.2:70000.00...0,.0...,L„. , •••••:•:•:•:•:•:-:•:•:•:::.', b n".• ''',,.":::;.,,,, '..i..., '' ,.:.::::::::::::::::::::::::,.::::::::::::::.',:, ,IP,,51',:, .o.o.o.% ••:;14•., •o• .'t: '(.. r'.••:-•, - ., I _/, fl),1;;;,,L'i:.;::;`,',',1,.-:•-;',,•,,s,,'..t..„I':1:--------2"efejll 4..7. iii.::e:..,,,. •,):•.„ '1/4 n .•.:1.::::MU J Irrill...0":6°O°o°,••• 1...\ ..;:.,0°°.09;0%.0.. ....)... 1.";'.462'::*.",''.,:•,".•. ,',:,,^3..).(i';`,''‘,.c,={:V•I','. <,,:.:13••'.yz,:'....44 ....,..,;•. \ \ ,,„.L'.j,;CI,Mt 4.0. '11' •' .P•qN 11'•'IC• ' '''.1.3;0.1.',34-,...1.,.., .‘,,, ,,.V..1,G2.•a'a •,,,ee'rrin -In '1Y',,•'0,',..)e:. ;;6.;1"7''' .•--'* ' '11,1'• ...:',:.9,„Is•ev"-; '..'>,?',. '..., )1 .n. )9 n. ..e9 e t) t 'tin .,q..•4."1 ,V.lq, 411PP ,' ..,:.:::::;::.'„,-;:c....,":',.;.',:'..4. .°' , \se.i, ,,,,,_:i..,::,,,,,"\/,°,0°.°°.:'0°.00.0°,3%.00,., .:;1.,3,..\':),,:,,, ,',.,;:.`,..-,.. ..,..;.20,..,,-.`',.',;,..:',.::.:,,i),,:,?.-;:', 3,,?..,I;;,:.,,,.. --'-'.. :1-...',•c: -.1.,,,-,. .,./).,,„,,, ... ." . ,. ............ ..... . . ., , ,.. .-....:::..-.......-i-... ,-..„....,-.. ,, , , AI • ': .'s.klc.' allIMMINO0.0000.0000. M=111..* . , L';0‘.1:,V:f.i,(6..4Vt 9'13(',''.' '. i','.. ..,J.. • ,..0‘..".4:4;:, .-,3 P.q•is, Elm.....,___-, 1 .0•,ty 0 ii ' :1•1C;:,.,,,• :-.; ::•:.:::::..9-Pornocp0--,,,,\ , 61\ _. -. . :0,••••• ••••••,.-.,, , •,- ,..,-,,-., ,•.'•"*.''4; .... w00000• .' . l' !.k ......--..1.-1.1 .'.*it''• ....., 1-- • \ , gt• e., en,,,,, 1. ,At i r \ "I IIIIIIII61 1:1 1%)i hi it t-TocOa• cOri ,,,000• 00 or,0000 - ,..0000 •r, : ••*., l• . 4 .. I -,;•,; : D ,,..a, , , , . . , . .,., „., .. .cro°0°%oh°0 0*o'...•• ' . ''..‘'."" , ,,c.:(0.)::83;00.:0:00::0 ..0..0.i• ••,.... I. ••••••„..b,...: _•.: .°0°0°.°0°.°0°.°0°.(1—,.:. .": •,_ iihip .-• _ , • ,... 1,- -• •.. •,,,,, , • - T IMIkroVo°0%. 00000 000 ,c, • ,c r•,..„.,„ ,... .•. IMO vou... •;;°,°°:°°°:°: ;11111\":"1...°%°°°):. , . •...c,..... :47,.I r.•••kg.,-•.; 1 • , 7 . . , . . 00.0(_ 0') •000000000, t•••• "v ., --- .Viii•F•iP- • `'..b... t ': :Att;ohirle,:',:•••,•,..1A'''',i ,i• ..1...•ill-,14-.•••4...:, ... ..- ., •• /66.• *000000000 V•• • k C R,. • • c ALE. l"z'4OC. , . V‘C-A i \v- M &P II Ii 1II . , /Il. Al. J 'Ill th: GEf7L�,2 —' 2EtJT�N 1 pp g, 2. voC.R.11\0 I 1, TF�a►L, I I ' 1NS"C - •- - i-s►cd�Lt�eat�s • 4 cNevaoti -a o�,tL� ,f_ How _ ,� d-�taI.s�jR AmtMA r SERAPE at Al vw-a�D4 Y [�VtCI _ r� ID STO p GOL t w)L ~ u�eo CA. f sH U H ,1 ifi l i . its MtarLEbJO.0 /71 ! Ili II) Pe..15 J AT P . S //11 o LOG�,�1® ,J i- 1 oPT • . 1 • a ,., s, V\ \ \ \ \\;\ \, \ \ 4 T2AIL.o(Z REs.:Tote c-ou 2T k1lvc,. I I GUVI.IZY I 51—Ld P5 . • • -------i.,.......___ • CITY Oi• f.''tlV". 1 1 . . AUG 13 f BUILDING/ZONING DEP e_ G1_,;- eco-z3-5 _ — I ,,, 1 I . LEGEI.l 1D- 6n. C.T(as^_.•)sl @1l-FEv DnzL: ' • ..m CC.17TmtGTOs1 7ECLU E.GE f m • `• �a . uGYT� en' ralr,f TO Cm.YP5. 5.r..00F M .-,•.F (15.54 4. urs4 -. 4 ). . nu �u cw..' . - m�.vs..n nue. �rm..+ • I\ j J -- ,ice i 90 mo "o' er q 90 ••••:. d...— mm a .,. \ / n 5., �. ea J10 I� € _ • . . m er.. m. mom.. 1. , 4 11' , F ---- I n _= I I f/ varzz-r11;.......,.......Y... ....'''', 'N.: - --m•-....—----- .-.--:--"-----.. .-----.-,..---,'..- -2...,,:- .. .... ey. . .... - • -----';1 • . IiEIEH `• --� Y L of --- -- - ---- - -- _e.� � e.. ft S I SEC. Be._ f"IO),IQAE GVE. NE. ....o en..,,=e...mam. II0 ..m....m ...�» .....rs et....ao.........,... vlcl.lmr ra: i lilt p • __ / al.r6a -�••.. N 1\ ------.Y,.� SEC.A.A.. -m j PHASE I '�� \ i--- - . JOHNR.EWINOANDASSOCIATES :.I i SERVICE CORPORATION'INTERNAT{G• . a LCC.SL OE7CQIFTIOr.1 — CNL DCORmp L D - AIC g yyyfl�y a RE p�pT.�15pIpOTOp 4o r• . . 0-6-07 A�� „a ,,• 21 my„_, , ,''• I GREENWOOD CEMETERY y_ ....7� . �,•�^s- • ..a•r� 7� p— VM!!R ovswpce NY ou p O. °pm NY ; ,,A vue.CUMILD. II7I.oz DUN DUN WOO Vl FILL,GRADE a RESTORATION 2 !T'.I'14.-. ➢L vernon A' Oral= w1L • .. i • • • g' COI.I•�TQ1JC•rlpu 'fie,IEUCE LC'GElJ 0 ' anw.co.n.....%asec..v•.°..c......v.c•...o.v.ce...�a e.... j • owu -u ma 'owivK 4. g. 111:. oac e. • _ : .�1. acres a = �`i �� -- --�".'\\\\,+ .�o.slm.,etl unu r,°sa eo c.c.C.NV.m..,vae. e u.er rwv renea u mme. / / I `` i 1---• •L''''' / '/,/ {� , , • 1 u.,m vc m:"m mry mom.a +��.a'r e8.c`.'e.°au. J \1, �`` '/' •�'/ _—_ _ `III os ..o..e..e u•'0�enje',.� xT..._"a 1 i l .. awe ° < a� SCALE l=40' /'o 1 ', !, /i. I I .tee I:-/:/ > i' ,, I��` 4-- 7 "ill: o - r !' ;� I111 .-- t ,% r;, :," ' hl 4 . /4 v,' ' , -- , •- g , 4... `\1'• .1 j' I III; • ...=-. 11; _m e 12 -�_ L ill' //,1:1/4.,,,,:,/:>)::(1—./5::://.1\::!;17-1L2 ' / -- ---- --- _, i 11„, . "s."Y.e I . •• ... J.s . /yam / / • �:-____'.;.41'71 j i I�II'itl ?:2: a _".��"r.. I I .m^/ I _ �n,' _i /1 r(i 1j111i1 ...Geo. �....,c�li \ ,'/ i! Il Illy TIIEAIC4 GE.T41 V ^• m.woe,m sa.rr VI'�tJGL/ L�cQITY'=ESCE �•fl era m:.E< e` i.' 1 m �{ i / I/ NI lid Ili // I i' f 3 t`' ' p j flip!'�1 ....e . a J fill 111111 ) ........... I .es...+<nuo.eavr) .w uum m<c'.. o ef,/De --- •s-•••+•..ts l °m Y� �--- --J -ref EC. AA me `; .,;. PHASE II �.: 1 SHIM JOHNrslc.WING AJ D ASSOCIATES i- SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL ,, worn B-e 87 �� ■eer.aasxiworox (>loeln�-a°aa `,• J i GREENWOOD CEMETERY '�—= 76753— L7C ouloa¢o al' own err CHIMED or 4s �LR l�T 2 • i7O2 cxx oxx vex ` FILL,GRADE B RESTORATION ►.n rn ocror nvD rrt MITIZ rn ova REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; I ..)-(A/MAA fiTIAAAL4 DA'PPROVED [ APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED iU kayvalitmulz, dtifrq ruiptAkill ¢ G� ! DATE1,r SIGNATUQE OF DIRECT OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE ' 2 /� r n �,� `�Lr.ov. . (mui" (5P• © • tv'�) ' _U-e--20 -.0HAAdiczeL brir, ?reit rm,1-7- 3. r.ilAiv a-mrziere — zAAry k r 0 ' 4 . Axe, ba likuutzflive CA.6utt at--1--AAA4& reer&e.tiLiTN r We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. • ' Q*it23O Signature of Director f Authorized Representative Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; /"« 1 -'etz/ /U--1,� Q APPROVED � APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ® NOT APPROVED D� ATE OF DIRECTOR s: AUTHO'r 'ED REPRESENTATIVE 1 REVISION E/1982 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; f'`)C. i--�� APPROVED [ \PPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ®.NOT APPROVED • �^ rn it:> ��-�- DATE: /0 '- SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV i1Od1 5/1982 Form 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ° -e--0IIU R) ® APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS INOT APPROVED C� FI LI IL6 1'Vl 051 68 C,-Al2c. MCA)I f& Cii)- TO 1VS�l I2 C ►RCN, QU.AL,t7'( F I Vi, 1 2 c6 ,WX U 'D f fR•Nj L I Ul. ,\)o'J FLAU -01-6 CA1Y0 1)u IIctR. z, Vt5RUY16-162 UPc�0sc� Iry }�rftcjr�10 .1l r6 Sl ;'ftP S*1.A_AD )36 IOFO. (UCY(6a (Or ) cb0fiO tt 1-14 (-3I 16 1S • jZ UI12� p61Z-- CA-011) N c o • DATE: )0-Lo-67 SIGNATURE OF DI CTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 07/1-,AT /L fl APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONSRI; NOT APPROVED imunfAPPROVAL SUP] 5-5:///Z 10. 91-t)-61,- aAreez) LATE CMS AGREEMENT-i:: _� ' yf5 458 /fZ'9. &I QIsftE LATE GAM ERU-S':.+; _•. .. -.._..$ 2/CoWas T: (AV eyvrftt.10 SUMO HEMMER CHJRCE-WATER •eV Se. 1,\IFLeGmce, copoldacv(z„. taf SYSTEM DEMPSEtill CHARGE-SEWER �S ;+.•.%. / if• 7 SPECK MEMENIT AREA CHARGE-WAITER I SPECdI!1. MM AREA CHARGE-SEWER I Np APPROVED ME MO G49 _QPPROM SX•Gbi P A.PPP..O1 ..,,.. �., f�����&ATIOS�� K9 _- FIRE FLO ANALYSIS 564-Yal `( itc _ '4 4 DATE: /0 _ 23 _ 87 SIGNATURE OF DI ' ECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVIISION 8/1982 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : %2. J2I2i;' Ef APPROVED LAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ®.NOT APPROVED 11 I p I IL) vil • DATE SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHOPTZED REPRESENTATIVE REVBS!CIV C/9982 ;, 'Form 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; OAPPROVED EAPPROVED WITH ;;;;;;- ITHCDITIONS ONOT APPROVED C J • t/ ve_. s .� (nJ : // r- .,..M�.•-.✓LL ;. 'i CiC.l�c.c' l/ �i:a-�,j'��r... ----•-- T 1D// /f DATE:_ SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : flirt?_ p<eVerclmn JJ APPROVED EEl APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ®.NOT APPROVED . h - DATE: (5)( /6(- /9/7 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REv0SOONV 5/9982 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : ' t d r / ------ " LJ APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ,. NOT APPROVED c--47‘2 • DATE: 1 °�3o 7 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE October 30, 1987 RE: SPECIAL PERMIT: SP-076-87 At this time the Police Department has to recommend that this permit application be denied. The work that has gone on at this site in the past. has created a great amount of work for the police department and danger for the general public. ' The applicant has agreed to keep the streets clean of all debris whenever asked at a meeting; however, in reality has never complied unless an officer is present and threatens to arrest the operator. In fact criminal citations have been issued in an effort to force compliance with the hearing examiner's decision and City Code. I would recommend that no further material be allowed from the site and any fill permit be issued with the following conditions - 1) Applicant hire an off duty Renton Police officer to monitor the job site at all times it is in operation to ensure compliance with the hearing , examiners decision and City Codes. 2) A screening fence at least four feet high be placed all the way around the site. 3) A wheel washing station be installed and every truck that leaves the site has to be washed so it is clean of all dirt and mud. 4) A street washer with operator in the cab be present at all times to clean the street if needed. 5) Maintain the same hauling hours as the previous permit. 6) No weekend work in the pit. 7) Posting of a $10,000 cash bond with the City to pay for any clean up that the contractor does not accomplish. 8) No tracking of dirt and/or mud onto the street at all. D. . PERSSON, Captain CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO. : ECF-066-87 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SP-076-87 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for special permit for fill and grade permit to allow the extension of an existing permit (SP- 048-85) which will allow completion of fill operations and restoration of the site. The work is to include 142, 000 cubic yards of removal and 295, 000 cubic yards of fill. PROPONENT: Service Corporation of Washington LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Property located at 350 Monroe Avenue N.E. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Building and Zoning Department The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C. 030(2) (c) . This decision was made after review of an expanded environmental checklist and preliminary site plan, on file with the lead agency. Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-2822 (D) Renton Municipal Code (see attached sheet) . These conditions are necessary to mitigate `environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340. The lead agency will not act on this proposal for fourteen (14) days from February 8, 1988. Any interested party may submit written comments which must be submitted by 5: 00 p.m. February 22, 1988, in order to be considered. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 235-2550 DATE OF DECISION: February 3, 1988 EFFECTIVE DATE: February 8, 1988 £4iiiL_ ARonald G. Nelson yl pringer' Building and Zoning Director Wlicy je1ome4 Director--7eYY Richard Houghton Public Works Director ( DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE MITIGATION MEASURES PROJECT: Greenwood Cemetery Gravel Pit ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF-066-87 APPLICATION NO. : SP-076-87 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for special permit for fill and grade permit to allow the extension of an existing permit (SP-048-85) which will allow completion of fill operations and restoration of the site. The work is to include 142, 000 cubic yards of removal and 295,000 cubic yards of fill. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Property located at 350 Monroe Avenue N.E. CONDITIONS: 1. That the applicant work with the City of Renton Police Department and the Public Works Department to determine acceptable haul routes. 2 . That the applicant contact the Seattle/King County Health Department to ensure that the fill material to be placed on the site is properly inspected and tested to ensure that it is acceptable and poses little or no risk to the City's drinking water supply. 3 . That the fill material contain only minor amounts of organic substances and shall have rock or similar irreducible material with a maximum dimension no greater than eight (8) inches in diameter pursuant to City ordinance. 4 . That the' fill material not contain soluble poisons or other leachable compounds (including all petroleum based substances including distillates and asphalt) which may have the potential for contaminating the City's drinking water. 5. That the applicant contract with an EPA approved testing lab to monitor the site and. to provide monthly reports on the types of fill material being deposited on the site and the results of leachate monitoring tests. NOTE: Such tests shall be carried out at least four times a year and shall include analysis for heavy metals, petroleum distillates and other probable contaminants. The results of these tests will be transmitted to Ron Olsen, Utility Engineer, Renton Department of Public Works and Greg Bishop, Environmental Control Section, Seattle/King County Health Department. 6. That the applicant provide at least two monitoring wells on site (one uphill and one downhill) that go down to the hardpan. 7 . That the applicant replace the vegetation in the 30 foot setback along the eastern and southern boundaries of the site with similar species of equal size. 8. That the applicant post a $5,000 cash bond for street cleaning. 9. That the hours of operation be from 8: 00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Monday through Friday for entire site; 7:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. Monday through Friday for Phase I only; and 10:00 a.m. to 6 p.m. on Saturdays. 10. That the applicant provide vehicle cleanup facilities including wheel wash down areas and sedimentation ponds on-site in addition to the existing concrete apron. ', Mitigatiofl Measures( Greenwood Cemetery LL_vel Pit February 8, 1988 Page 2 11. That a minimum six (6) foot high view obscuring fence be installed around the fill site. 12 . That the applicant provide a performance bond or similar guarantee acceptable to the City Attorney for an amount of $10,000 to cover street cleanup or damages to vehicles attributable to the proposed use. 13. That the applicant provide the City with a copy of the contractor's contract which shall include the conditions of the Environmental Review Committee, the Hearing Examiner (if any) , and the • recommendations of the Geotechnical Engineer dated March 1987. This report shall be submitted to the City prior to the issuance of the annual license. - r 1 , ::mETRD „ Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle Exchange Building • 821 Second Ave. • Seattle,WA 98104-1598 ' i a Y r RENT ON February 19, 1988 j i �C2 E u v � hFEB 2.31988 BUILDING / ZONING DEPT. Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Determination of Non-Significance File No: SP 076-87 Service Corporation of Washington .Dear Environmental Review Committee: Metro staff has reviewed this proposal and anticipates no significant impacts to its wastewater facilities. Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment. Sincerely, Gregory M. Bush, Manager c *„Al,�� Environmental Planning Division • GMB:vbg DEB �5 '\9 BTAT c4 )ACK S. WAYLAND ',`?, � Director yyC/ggg a6 STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE Region Four Office -- 16018 Mill Creek Boulevard, Mill Creek, WA 98012 -- (206) 775-1311 February 16, 1988 Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 MITI Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Re: File SP-076-87; Service Corporation of Washington; MDNS Dear Sirs: The Department of Wildlife concurs with the determination and supports the proposed revegetation. Sincerely, THE DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE /404-,,,- 01/ Tony Opp- mann Habitat Biologist TO:td cc: Habitat Management Division - Olympia 'mod•3 �) ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE 10:00 A.M. Renton Municipal Building February 3, 1988 3rd Floor Conference Room MINUTES ATTENDING: Ron Nelson, Chairman; Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator; Larry Springer, Policy Development Director; Dick Houghton, Public Works Director; Mike Parness, Administrative Assistant; Jeanette Samek-Mckague, Senior Planner; John Adamson, Program Development Coordinator; Carolyn Sundvall, Recording Secretary. 1. CALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order by the Chairman. 2. CONTINUED PROJECTS: ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY - ARCO AM/PM MINI MART Conditional Use Permit to allow construction of an AM/PM Mini Mart with gasoline sales. The project will include the construction of a 2,480 sq.ft. building with a 30'x 53' canopy with two split 32' pump islands for gasoline sales, with three 12,000 galiun double containment underground storage tanks. Site includes 13 parking stalls, landscaping and two free-standing signs. Property located on the northwest corner of the intersection of Sunset Boulevard and Duvall Avenue Northeast. (ECF-056-87; CU- 065-87) • Donald Erickson gave background information on the project and,he reviewed the staff report with the Committee. Springer suggested a letter of appreciation to the applicant on the joint access and the "Welcome To Renton" sign. DECISION: Larry Springer made a motion to issue a Declaration of Non-Significance with the 7 conditions listed on the Staff Report with the exception of condition 5 which should be deleted. However, Condition 5 should not be deleted on the north parcel. Ron Nelson seconded the motion. Carried. THE VYZIS COMPANY Application for special permit for fill and grading permit to allow the filling of approximately 14,300 cubic yards of material on 20.9 acres of property. Note: Site was previously filled with permit No. SP-134-78. Property located on the west side of Lind Avenue S.W. between the 1900 and 2300 block. (ECF-088-87; SP-102-87) Don Erickson gave background information on th6 project. He stated that originally the Committee had issued a Determination of Non Ssignificance - Mitigated on this project, but after a meeting regarding the P-1 Channel a decision was made to issue a Determination of Signifiance. In light of new information, from the Department of Ecology, it was determined that there would be an impact on the flood insurance program and the storm water drainage system. It would also violate City and Federal Ordinance and City Policy. DECISION: Larry Springer made a motion to reconsider the Declaration of Non- Significance, Mitigated issued on both Vyzis and Alaska Distributors. Seconded by Ron Nelson. Carried. Mike Parness will set up a meeting for Wednesday, February 10, 1988 to include Larry Warren, Ron Nelson, Don Erickson, Mike Parness, Larry Springer and Dick Houghton to discuss the project further. GREENWOOD CEMETERY GRAVEL PIT (SERVICE CORP. OF AMERICA) Application for special permit for fill and grade permit to allow extension of existing permit (SP-048-85) which will allow completion of fill operations and restoration of site. The-work is,to include 142,000 cu. yd. of removal and 295, cu. yd. of fill. (ECF-066- 87,;_SP�076-87) Don Erickson gave background information. He stated that after reviewing the project a number of things came up that was not apparent before. He referred to a letter dated March 27, 1987 from Rittenhouse-Zeman & Associates, Geotechnical Consultants. Issues raised were: 1. Large chunks of concrete put into the pit along with wood waste. 2. Optimum moisture content, which presents a stability problem. 3. Quality of fill material. He stated that the applicant should submit a program for rehabilitation to the existing drainage system. Hour !' operation will be 8:00 - 4:00, Monday through Friday; Environmental Review Coy tee Minutes February 3, 1988 PAGE 2 DECISION: Larry Springer made a motion to issue a Declaration of Non-Significance - Mitigated. Ron Nelson seconded the motion. Carried. 3. NEW PROJECTS: RENTON VILLAGE ASSOCIATES Application for site plan approval to allow the expansion of an existing three-plex cinema with 20,000 sq. ft. and 1.405 seats. It is to operate as an an eight-plex cinema for a new total of 36,253 sq. ft. and 2,260 seats. It is located in the Renton Village Complex at 25 South Grady Way. (ECF -090-87; SA-103-87) Don Erickson gave background information. He stated the new building will be double the size of what is presently on the site. He referred to the issues on the Staff Report and stated that areas of concern were: egress and ingress, drainage, aesthetics, pedestrian circulation from the parking area and landscaping. These areas had not been addressed by the applicant. DECISION: Ron Nelson made a motion to defer action until the issues have been answered, seconded by Larry Springer. Carried. McDONALDS CORPORATION Application for administrative site plan approval to construct a 3,951 sq. ft., single story restaurant located on the south side of N. E. 44th Street and east of I-405. (SA-107-87) Don Erickson gave background information on the project and reviewed the issues on the Staff Report. Discussion took place on the site plan. Committee expressed concern on circulation. Ron Nelson asked that signage be addressed with the applicant. DECISION: Larry Springer made a motion to issue a Declaration of Non-Significance - Mitigated with the 7 conditions listed on the staff report Ron Nelson seconded the motion. Carried. • CITY OF RENTON - PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Application for a Local Improvement District for Street and Utility Improvements on N. E. 44th Street. Improvements include street and utility, street widening, new sanitary, water, and storm improvements and new traffic signal at I-405 on/off ramp. (ECF-100- 87) Don Erickson gave background information on the project. The Committee reviewed the conditions listed on the Staff Report and discussion took place. Dick Houghton told the Committee that the State had verbally agreed to design the widening of the overcrossing at 44th at their cost. Larry Springer stated that conditions 2 and 3, on the staff report had already taken care of. He suggested that condition Number 4, dealing with annexation petitions, be dropped. DECISION: Larry Springer made a motion to hold the project until questions on vehicle circulation, landscaping and bicycle trails, were answered. Ron Nelson seconded the motion. Carried. CITY OF RENTON - PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Renton Avenue South and West Hill Sewer Replacement - Includes replacement of the small, existing sanitary sewers with new 8" and 10" sewers. (ECF-101-87) After giving the Committee background information, issues from the Staff Report were reviewed. The Committee felt that the application was not clear and that it lacked an appropriate description of the proposed action. The map was also in error. DECISION: Larry Springer made a motion to defer action until more information was available. Ron Nelson seconded the motion. Carried. 4. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 12:30 p.m. J NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON ON March 1 . 1988 , AT 9:00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: SERVICE CORPORATION OF AMERICA (GREENWOOD CEMETERY) Application for special permit for fill and grade permit to allow the extension of an existing permit (SP-048-85) which will allow completion of fill operations and restoration of the site. The work is to include 142, 000 :cubic yards of removal and 295, 000 cubic yards of fill. Property located at 350 Monroe Avenue N.E. (ECF-066-87 ; SP-076-87) Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Building and Zoning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON March 1 , 1988 , AT 9:00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. PUBLISHED : February 19 , 1988 Ronald G. Nelson • Building and Zoning Director CERTIFICATION I, JERRY F. LIND , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE (3) COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE .CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON OR NEARYBY THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW.. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a I Notary Public, in and fdt tho Stato of Washington rosiding in '-�ej;o,J on the Iq -RI day of FE Iag/ . . tClx a c SIGNED: OtA)1..A..6T.I.Aplc,t #214 \ . . .. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON , TUESDAY, MARCH 1, 1988, AT 9: 00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY (ARCO SHORT PLAT) An application to short plat 1.213 acres into two (2) lots for an AM/PM MiniMart. Located at 1537 Duvall Avenue N. E. (SH PL 089-87) ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY (ARCO AM/PM MINIMART) Conditional use permit to allow construction of an AM/PM MiniMart with gasoline sales. The project will include the construction of a 2, 480 sq. ft. building with a 30 ' x 53 ' canopy with two split 32 ' pump islands for gasoline sales, with three 12, 000 gallon double containment underground storage tanks. Site includes ,13 parking stalls, landscaping, and two free-standing signs. The property is located on the northwest corner of the intersection of Duvall Avenue N. E. and N. E. Sunset Boulevard. (CU-065-87; ECF-056-87) SERVICE CORPORATION OF AMERICA (GREENWOOD CEMETERY) Application for special permit for fill and grade permit to allow the extension of an existing permit (SP-048-85) which will allow completion of . fill operations and restoration of the site. The work is to include 142, 000 cubic yards of removal and 295, 000 cubic yards of fill. Property located at 350 Monroe Avenue N.E. (ECF-066-87; SP-076-87) Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Building and Zoning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON , TUESDAY, MARCH 1, 1988, AT 9:00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. Published: February 19, 1988 -cam j- . 5706 7 A, .c o� .'le I O . , 094T 0 S SEPZEM�P City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner • Will hold a p r x , . ' S i •44 �{ t- # � ..� 'G k ' ��' n ro ;:•i • to 1 i �>a� Y f x ''� f �1 13 ,,,5. �( , L i4 a4Z v' 4' tf in CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL ON GH-1 ,g BEGINNING AT 9 : oo A.M. P.M. CONCERNING® SERVICE CORPORATION OF AMERCIA(GREENWOOD ® CEMETARY) SP-076-87 ECF-066-87 APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT FOR FILL AND GRADE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE EXTENSI OF AN EXISTING PERMIT (SP-048-85) WHICH WILL ALLOW COMPLETION OF FILL OPERATI AND RESTORATION OF THE SITE. THE WORK IS TO INCLUDE 142, 00 CUBIC YARDS OF REMOVAL AND 295, 000 CUBIC YARDS OF FILL. _ — - rill 1 I if b , Furze GZWTON I I OPTS, -- i volt Z2 TFLNU J — WS1 I I I uzni... 2 — MOPitG01 1 �,* 5.., ram M+s A CN't 14— / L [ a\� \� \\\\�, CRT NtwL j fr.. \ CO. 1 I T 4 MATi.}.10 V O r/i/PP) 1\ PROJECT ���F J u'j•¢t //2 Vtia-,0 \ 1_OC-1 .T10IQ 1 6� / \\ \\.\\. \\ \ \ \ \ \ s fON 15DI 5 ktr-u, g1-io P5Y - ^ t GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR AD® ESS: LOCATED AT 350 MONROE AVENUE N.E. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION CITY OF RENTON m& BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director February 16, 1988 Service Corporation of Washington 350 Monroe Avenue N. E. Renton, WA 98056 RE: SERVICE CORPORATION OF WASHINGTON (GREENWOOD CEMETERY) File No. SP-076-87; ECF-066-87 Gentlemen: A public hearing before the City of Renton, Land Use Hearing Examiner has been scheduled for Tuesday, March 1, 1988, on the above-referenced matter. The public hearing will commence at 9 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall in Renton, Washington. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant are required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you before the hearing. If you have any questions, please call the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2550. Sincerely, Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE/adk Filedsc:a: lpartrec 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 di t$` CITY OF RENTON taLL "� BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director February 16, 1988 John R. Ewing and Associates -1314 South Central, Suite 200 Kent, WA 98032 Attention: Mr. Granville Horn RE: SERVICE CORPORATION OF WASHIDTGTON (GREENWOOD CEMETERY) File No. SP-076-87; ECF-066-87 Dear Mr. Horn: A public hearing before the City of Renton, Land Use Hearing Examiner has been scheduled for Tuesday, March 1, 1988, on the above-referenced matter. The public hearing will commence at 9 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall in Renton, Washington. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant are required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you before the hearing. If you have any questions, please call the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2550. Sin ely, Dona K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE/adk Filedsc:a: lpartrec 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 (40•) CITY OF RENTON t 'tl li;.y,• '4." �� •, BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director February 16, 1988 Service Corporation International P. O. Box X-1010 San Diego, CA 92112 RE: SERVICE CORPORATION OF WASHINGTON (GREENWOOD CEMETERY) File No. SP-076-87; ECF-066-87 Gentlemen: A public hearing before the City of Renton, Land Use Hearing Examiner has been scheduled for Tuesday, March 1, 1988, on the above-referenced matter. The public hearing will commence at 9 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall in Renton, Washington. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant are required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you before the hearing. If you have any questions, please call the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2550. Sincerely, V Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE/adk Filedsc:a: lpartrec 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 mA CITY OF RENTON ® € BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director February 9, 1988 • Gregory M. Bush, Manager Environmental Review Division METRO 821 2nd Avenue M.S. #92 Seattle, WA 98104 RE: Service Corporation of Washington, File SP-076-87 Dear Mr. Bush: Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Determination of Non- Significance - Mitigated and the Mitigation Measures for the above referenced project. If you have any questions, please call me at 235-2550. Sincerely, 0 L. ,.� Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator Enclosures DE:cs 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 (206) 235-2540 % f CITY fir F RENTON LL 11 4 t"+� BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director February 9, 1988 Dept. of Wildlife 16018 Mill Creek Blvd. Mill Creek, WA 98012 RE: Service Corporation of Washington, File SP-076-87 Dear Sirs: Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Determination of Non- Significance - Mitigated and the Mitigation Measures for the above referenced project. If you have any questions, please call me at 235-2550. Sincerely, Lbv•ix Donald K. Erickson, AICPc�' Zoning Administrator Enclosures DE:cs C- 200 Mill Avenue South.- Renton, Washington 98055 = (206) 235-2540 CITY OF RENTON ea ' BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director February 9, 1988 Joe Robels Dept. of Fisheries Habitat Management Division, Rm 115 MS-AX-11 Olympia, WA 98504 RE: Service Corporation of Washington, File SP-076-87 Dear Mr. Robels: • Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Determination of Non- Significance - Mitigated and the Mitigation Measures for the above referenced project. If you have any questions, please call me at 235-2550. Sincerely, c)cy..-\&a& Donald K. Erickson, AICPJ Zoning Administrator Enclosures DE:cs • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 siu CITY OF RENT®N tea BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director February 9, 1988 Washington State Dept. of Ecology Environmental Review Section Mail Stop PV-11 Olympia, WA 98504 RE: Service Corporation of Washington, File SP-076-87 Dear Sirs: Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Determination of Non- Significance - Mitigated and the Mitigation Measures for the above referenced project. If you have any questions, please call me at 235-2550. Sincerely, Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator Enclosures DE:cs 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 a► CITY OF RENTON t`` i BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director February 9, 1988 . Mr. Gerald W. Marbett Bldg. & Land Dev. Div. 450 King County Admin. Bldg. Seattle, WA 98104 RE: Service Corporation of Washington, File SP-076-87 Dear Mr. Marbett: Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Determination of Non- Significance - Mitigated and the Mitigation Measures for the above referenced project. If you have any questions, please call me at 235-2550. Sincerely, Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator Enclosures DE:cs • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 ;* CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director February 9, 1988 Service Corporation International P.O. Box X-1010 San Diego, California 92112 RE: Service Corporation of Washington, File SP-076-87 Dear Sirs: Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Determination of Non- Significance - Mitigated and the Mitigation Measures for the above referenced project. If you have any questions, please call me at 235-2550. Sincerely, ko_ Donald K. Erickson, AICP6 • Zoning Administrator Enclosures DE:cs • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 46 W CITY OF RENTON isIL '"'• BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director February 9, 1988 John R. Ewing & Associates 1314 South Central Suite. 200 Kent, Washington 98032 RE: Service Corporation of Washington, File SP-076-87 Dear Sirs: Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Determination of Non- Significance - Mitigated and the Mitigation Measures for the above referenced project. If you have any questions, please call me at 235-2550. Sincerely, Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator Enclosures DE:cs - 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 t$ f CITY OF RENTON tall '` BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director February 9, 1988 Service Corporation of Washington 350 Monroe Avenue N.E. Renton, Washington 98056 RE: Service Corporation of Washington, File SP-076-87 Dear Sirs: • Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Determination of Non- Significance - Mitigated and the Mitigation Measures for the above referenced project. If you have any questions, please call me at 235-2550. Sincerely, Donald K. Erickson, AICP U -- Zoning Administrator Enclosures DE:cs • 200 Mill Avenue..South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO. : ECF-066-87 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SP-076-87 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for special permit for fill and grade permit to allow the extension of an existing permit (SP- 048-85) which will allow completion of fill operations and restoration of the site. The work is to include 142, 000 cubic yards of removal and 295, 000 cubic yards of fill. PROPONENT: Service Corporation of Washington LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Property located at 350 Monroe Avenue N.E. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Building and Zoning Department The City of Renton Environmental Re:►iew Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43 .21C.030(2) (c) . This decision was made after review of an expanded environmental checklist and preliminary site plan, on file with the lead agency. Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-2822 (D) Renton Municipal Code (see attached sheet) . These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340. The lead agency will not act on this proposal for fourteen (14) days from February 8, 1988. Any interested party may submit written comments which must be submitted by 5: 00 p.m. February 22, 1988, in order to be considered. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 235-2550 DATE OF DECISION: February 3, 1988 EFFECTIVE DATE: February 8, 1988 //20// £11Il1!LAAi Ronald G. Nelson y pringer' Building and Zoning Director 'l icy D- velopme4 Director Richard Houghton Public Works Director DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE MITIGATION MEASURES PROJECT: Greenwood Cemetery Gravel Pit ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF-066-87 APPLICATION NO. : SP-076-87 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for special permit for fill and grade permit to allow the extension of an existing permit (SP-048-85) which will allow completion of fill operations and restoration of the site. The work is to include 142, 000 cubic yards of removal and 295, 000 cubic yards of fill. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Property located at 350 Monroe Avenue N.E. CONDITIONS: 1. That the applicant work with the City of Renton Police Department and the Public Works Department to determine acceptable haul routes. 2 . That the applicant contact the Seattle/King County Health Department to ensure that the fill material to be placed on the site is properly inspected and tested to ensure that it is acceptable and poses little or no risk to the City's drinking water supply. 3 . That the fill material contain only minor amounts of organic substances and shall have rock or similar irreducible material with a maximum dimension no greater than eight (8) inches in diameter pursuant to City ordinance. 4 . That the fill material not contain soluble poisons or other leachable compounds (including all petroleum based substances including distillates and asphalt) which may have the potential for contaminating the City's drinking water. 5. That the applicant contract with an EPA approved testing lab to monitor the site and to provide monthly reports on the types of fill material being deposited on the site and the results of leachate monitoring tests. NOTE: Such tests shall be carried out at least four times a year and shall include analysis for heavy metals, petroleum distillates and other probable contaminants. The results of these tests will be transmitted to Ron Olsen, Utility Engineer, Renton Department of Public Works and Greg Bishop, Environmental Control Section, Seattle/King County Health Department. 6. That the applicant provide at least two monitoring wells on site (one uphill and one downhill) that go down to the hardpan. 7 . That the applicant replace the vegetation in the 30 foot setback along the eastern and southern boundaries of the site with similar species of equal size. 8. That the applicant post a $5, 000 cash bond for street cleaning. 9 . That the hours of operation be from 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Monday through Friday for entire site; 7: 00 p.m. to 10: 00 p.m. Monday through Friday for Phase I only; and 10: 00 a.m. to . 6 p.m. on Saturdays. 10. That the applicant provide vehicle cleanup facilities including wheel wash down areas and sedimentation ponds on-site in addition to the existing concrete apron. Mitigation Measures Greenwood Cemetery Gravel Pit February 8, 1988 Page 2 11. That a minimum six (6) foot high view obscuring fence be installed around the fill site. 12 . That the applicant provide a performance bond or similar guarantee acceptable to the City Attorney for an amount of $10, 000 to cover street cleanup or damages to vehicles attributable to the proposed use. 13 . That the applicant provide the City with a copy of the contractor's contract which shall include the conditions of the Environmental Review Committee, the Hearing Examiner (if any) , and the recommendations of the Geotechnical Engineer dated March 1987. This report shall be submitted to the City prior to the issuance of the annual license. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION A publi RENTON,WASHINGTON belhed by the Ren- ton Hearing Examiner at his regular meet- ing in the council chambers on the second Audrey Benner ,beingfirst dulysworn on oath states floor of city hall, Renton, Washington, on, Tuesday, Match 1, 1988, at 9:00 a.m. to ; that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the :onsidet the following petitions: I ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY 1 (ARCO SHORT PLAT) VALLEY DAILY NEWS An application to short plat 1.213 acres into two(2) lots for an AM/PM MlniMart. • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition ' Located at 1537 Duvall Avenue N.E.(SH • PL 089-87) ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week.That said newspapers ;(ARCO AM/PM MINIMART) are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six Conditional use permit to allow construc- tion of an AM/PM MlniMart with gasoline months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published sales. The project will include the con ii - in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King struction of a 2,480 sq.ft.building with a County,Washington.The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal 30'x53' canopy with two split 32' pump islands for gasoline sales, with three newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for ' 12,000 gallon double containment under- Kin ground storage tanks. Site includes 13 g County. parking stalls, landscaping, and two free- standing signs.The property is located on The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the Kent Edition the northwest corner of the intersection of I Duvall Avenue N.E. and N.E. Sunset , Renton Edition c Auburn Edition , (and not in Boulevard.(CU-065-87;ECF-058-87) i supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers SERVICE CORPORATION OF AMERICA duringthe below statedperiod.The annexed notice a (GREENWOOD CEMETERY) Application for special permit for fill and j 11 o i-i c., o f Pun t i c i t p a r i n r} grade permit to allow the extension of an i existing permit (SP-048-85) which will • was published on k=b r u a r 19 , 19t t3 9 R2 813 allow completion of fill operations and Y restoration of the site. The work is to include 142,000 cubic yards of removal and 295,000 cubic yards of fill. Property located at 350 Monroe Avenue N.E. The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the (ECF-066-87;81247647) Legal descriptions of the files noted sum of $3 8• 4 U . `above are on file in the Renton Building end Zoning Department. //�� All interested persons to said petitions i ar"•2'1"-•- , ing on,,ted et ae, Ma present at the 1988,pu atic 9:00 ��j.��� ing Tuesday, March 1, 9:00 a.m.to express their opinions. Published in the Valley Daily News Feb- ruary 19,1988.R2813 Subscribed and sworn to before me this 1st day of Ma rc i1 19_g$ GAL ( ,fa� Notar ublic for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, King County, Washington. VDN#87 Revised 11 86 Public Notice NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of NON- Audrey 3e nne r ,being first duly sworn on oath states SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED for the follow- that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the ing project(s) under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. The Applicant(s) have completed a mitigation process pursu- ant to WAC 197-11-350. VALLEY DAILY NEWS SERVICE CORPORATION OF WASH- INGTON(Greenwood Cemetery Gravel Pit) • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition Application for special permit for fill and grade permit to allow the extension of an Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week.That said newspapers existing permit(SP-048-85)which will allow are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six completion of fill operations and restoration 2,000 monthsprior to the date ofpublication referred to,printed andpublished of the site.rd The work ls andto include pubic cubic yards of removal 295,000 pubic in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King yards of fill. Property located at 35C Ion- roe Avenu County,Washington.The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal SP-076 87e N.E. File Nos.: ECF-066-8, end newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for Further information regarding this action King County. is available in the Building and Zoning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2540. Any appeal of ERC The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the Kent Edition action must be filed with the City of Renton Hearing Examiner by February 22, 1988. , Renton Edition A , Auburn Edition , (and not in Published in the Valley Daily News Feb. supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers 8, 1988.R2791. during the below stated period.The annexed notice a Public ,Autice was published on February 8, 1988 R27y1 • The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $ 2 2 .4 0 . Subscribed and sworn to before me this].9 th day of Fe b 193 c i Notary lic for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, King County, Washington. VDN#87 Revised 11/86 " * % f ,'nderground Injection Control Program Chapter 173-218 Miere design criteria have been established, the permit- to identifythe e new permittee and to incorporate such shall not permit flows or waste loadings to exceed other requirements as determined necessar • y` bythe de- t' i " 'ved design criteria or approved revisions thereto. partment. ; g ,,,(S) A new application, or supplement to the previous i;'• [Statutory Authority: Chapters 43.21A and 90.48 RCW. 83-23-073 application, shall be submitted, along with required en- (Order DE 83-29), § 173-216-120, filed 11/18/83.] ,• _..Y jtneering plans and reports, whenever a new or increased .i•lGscharge or change in the nature of the discharge is an- WAC 173-216-130 Modification, suspension, and ', -- - "' wiu;;n'is not specifically authorized by the cur- revocation of permits. (1) Any permit issued under this }1, liermit. Such application Shall be submitted at least chapter can be modified, suspended, or revoked, in whole drys prior to any proposed changes. or in part by the department for the following causes: i lin the event the permittee is unable to comply (a) Violation of any permit term or condition; ay of the permit terms and conditions due to any (b) Obtaining a permit by misrepresentation or failure t ai%L. '• fl the permittee shall: to fully disclose all relevant facts; t']' !) Immediately take action to stop, contain, and (c) A material change in 'f, •`,.y.-; " g quantity or type of waste t• up unauthorized discharges or otherwise stopthe disposal; 2r.V P t4 ,„ion,and correct the problem; (d) A material change in the condition of the waters • ; ,(b)(Immediately notify the department of the failure of the state; or r,:a mply;and (e) Nonpayment of permit fees assessed pursuant to ' °`fc Submit a detailed written report to the department RCW 90.48.460. • ,'n thirty days, unless requested earlier by the de- (2) The department may modify a permit, including ?i 'ent, describing the nature of the violation, correc- the schedule of compliance or other conditions, if it de- Ie'action taken and/or planned, steps to be taken to termines good and valid cause exists, which includes , "}ent a recurrence, and any other pertinent promulgation or revisions of categorical standards. I ' . .' • ormation. [Statutory Authority: Chapter 43.21A RCW. 86-06-040 (Order 86- ;, (7)In the case of discharge into a municipal sewerage 03), § 173-216-130, filed 3/4/86. Statutory Authority: Chapters 43-°:•lystem, the department shall consider in the final permit .2IA and 90.48 RCW.83-23-073 (Order DE 83-29), § 173-216-130,filed 1 I/18/83.] n. t,r kicuments the requirements of the municipality operat- fig the system. ; - ;(8) Permits for domestic wastewater facilities shall be WAC 173-216-140 Relationship with NPDES per- > . 4 �,�ued only to a public entity, except in the following mits. For a given facility, permit requirements under this > t'ucd Lances: chapter and NPDES permit requirements under Water 'X''` Pollution Control Act, RCW 90.48.260, shall under nor- ',r (r '(a) Facilities existing or approved for construction ;ieith private operation on or before the effective date of mal circumstances, be contained in a single permit doe- i°t this chapter, until such time as the facility is expanded; ument, except for general permits as provided for in 1 "" ' ° `;(b) Facilities that serve a single nonresidential, indus-' NPDES permit program, WAC 173-220-045. f"''`:v1. itial, or commercial establishment. Commercial/Indus [Statutory Authority: Chapters 43.21A and 90.48 RCW. 83-23-073 l . - �arial complexes serving multiple owners or tenants and (Order DE 83-29), § 173-216-140, filed 1 I/18/83.] a)+,'multiple residential dwelling facilities such as mobile } �'ln;home parks, apartments, and condominiums are not WAC 173-216-150 Delegation of authority to issue f "• , .considered single commercial establishments for the permits for discharges into sewer systems. Qualified cit- ; . .,' . • ies, towns, and other municipal ,, r'purpose of the preceding sentence. corporations who admin- (c) Facilities that are owned by nonpublic entities and inter a local permit program shall fulfill the .„, ,.. "is,`\ under contract to a public entity shall be issued a joint requirements of chapter 173-208 WAC and 40 CFR y `•• permit to both the owner and the public entity. Part 403. F 4' [Statutory Authority: Chapter 43.2IA RCW. 86-06-040 (Order 86- It, '' [Statutory Authority: Chapter 43.21A RCW. 86-06-040 (Order 86- 03), § 173-216-150, filed 3/4/86.] 1.'' ( ^ -,+ 031,§ 173-216-I10, filed 3/4/86. Statutory Authority: Chapters 43- 3, ? .21A and 90.48 RCW. 83-23-073 (Order DE 83-29), § 173-216110,�' filed I1/18/83.] [ t fi . Chapter 173-218 WAC Il ; � WAC 173-216-120 Transfer of a permit. (l) A '":° UNDERGROUND.INJECTION CONTROL permit is automatically transferred to a new owner or PROGRAM i ." li f'It tr operator if: ti WAC t,A1 (a) A written agreement between the old and new 173-218-010 Purpose. - K , ;: owner or operator containing a specific date for transfer 173-218-020 Policy enunciated. 1 of permit responsibility, coverage, and liability is sub- 173-218-030 Definitions. y4s �' milted to the department; and 173-218-040 Authorization required. ¢ �' 173-218-050 Class I injection wells. ,it (b) The department does not notify the permittee of 173-218-060 Class II injection wells. [', the need to modify, or revoke and reissue the permit. 173-218-070 Class III injection wells. aft (2) Unless a permit is automatically transferred ac 173-218-080 Class IV injection wells. :, cording to subsection (1) of this section, a ermit ma 173-218-090 Class V injection wells. 4 A, P Y 173-218-100 Permit terms and conditions. t , .., be transferred only if modified or revoked and r nr;ireissued 173-218-I1 0 Enforcement. N ;1? (1986 Ed.) 'x [Title 173 WAC—p 225] [t P,: `' 1?' 173-218-010 Title 173 WAC: Ecology, Departmen- +VY,.' WAC 173-218-010 Purpose. (1) The purpose of (c) For storage of hydrocarbons which are liquid at ;g , this chapter is to set forth the procedures and practices standard temperature and pressure. t� applicable to the injection of fluids through wells. (4) "Class III injection well" means a well used for ' (2) Permits issued in accordance with the provisions extraction of minerals, including but not limited to the A of this chapter are designed: injection of fluids for: `• (a) To satisfy the intent and requirements of Part C (a) In—situ production of uranium or other metals that `iih of the Federal Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) 42 have not been conventionally mined; t1 U.S.C. § 300h et seq. as authorized by RCW 43.21A- (b) Mining of sulfur by Frasch process; or ii' .445 and of the Water Pollution Control Act, chapter P. p (c) Solution mining of salts or potash. d�'; 90.48 RCW; and (5) "Class IV injection well" means a well used to in- b Topreserve andprotectground waters, includingl'' ( ) ject dangerous or radioactive waste Fluids. :'p underground sources of drinking water, for existing and (6) "Class V injection well" means all injection wells ?; future beneficial uses. not included in Classes I, 11, III, or IV. [Statutory Authority: RCW 43.21A.445. 84-06-023 (Order DE 84- (7) "Dangerous waste" means any discarded, useless, i$, 02), § 173-218-010, filed 2/29/84.] unwanted, or abandoned nonradioactive substances, in- :',i 411 eluding but not limited to certain pesticides or any resi- t, WAC 173-218-020 Policy enunciated. (1) It shall dues or containers of such substances, which are fit,, be the policy of the department of ecology in carrying disposed of in such quantity or concentration as to pose out the purposes of this chapter: a substantial present or potential hazard to human Y �, (a) To maintain the highest possible standards to pre- health, wildlife, or the environment because such wastes -,' vent the injection of fluids that may endanger ground or constituents or combinations of such wastes: 7`,, waters which are obtainable for beneficial uses or which (a) Have short—lived, toxic properties that may cause ;..,,;. contain fewer than 10,000 mg/L of total dissolved solids; death, injury, or illness or have mutagenic, tertogenic, or k , (b) To require the use of all known, available, and carcinogenic properties; or ":1,' reasonable methods to prevent and control the discharge (b) Are corrosive, explosive, flammable, or may gen- 4'; of fluids and waste fluids into the waters of the state; erate pressure through decomposition or other means ,1, (c) To protect public health and welfare through (Hazardous Waste Disposal Act, chapter 70.105 RCW). tit preservation and protection of the quality of the state's (8) "Department" means department of ecology. sty', ground waters. (9) "Fluid" means any material or substance which p'' (2) Consistent with this policy: flows or moves whether in a semisolid, liquid, sludge, E t'; (a) The disposal of waste fluids from industrial, com- gas, or any other form or state. V mercial, or municipal sources into wells will not be (10) "Ground waters" means all waters that exist be- -3: authorized by the department, except that existing oper- neath the land surface or beneath the bed of any stream, . zxfi ations are authorized providing these operations satisfy lake or reservoir, or other body of surface water within s' 0.1 the standards and requirements of this chapter; the boundaries of this state, whatever may be the geo- 1,`L i. (b) The department will act to prevent the disposal of logical formation or structure in which such water ,0' ei waste fluids that present a risk to human health, includ- stands or flows, percolates, or otherwise moves (Regula- '"1` r ing the potential, chronic effects of lifetime exposure to tion of public ground waters, chapter 90.44 RCW). i' waste fluids. (1 1) "Injection well" means a "well" that is used for . ,, the subsurface emplacement of fluids. : :'' [Statutory Authority: RCW 43.21A.445. 84-06-023 (Order DE 84- p �,• �Y�; 12 "New injection well" means an injection well y *.•>' 02), § 173-218-020,filed 2/29/84.] ( ) 1 1 �'f° that is proposed subsequent to the effective date of this l.' WAC 173-218-030 Definitions. (1) "Beneficial chapter. :;x'r ., uses" shall include, among others, uses for domestic wa- (13) "Person" includes any political subdivision, local, r `"" ter, irrigation, fish, shellfisth, game, and other aquatic state, or federal government agency, municipality, in- °vi ,,• life, municipal, recreation, industrial water, generation dustry, public or private corporation, partnership, asso- 1-,] ciation, firm, individual, or anyother entitywhatsoever. 1.4 of electric power, and navigation. , (2) "Class I injection well" means a well used to in- (14) "Radioactive waste" means any waste which r'• ,, ject industrial, commercial, or municipal waste fluids contains radioactive material in concentrations which "'•ai, beneath the lowermost formation containing, within exceed those listed in 10 Code of Federal Regulations • ,,I ; 1/4—mile of the well bore, an USDW. Part 20, Appendix B, Table II, Column 2. "i:;�i, 15 "SDWA" means Part C of the Federal Safe �", ;° (3) "Class II injection well" means a well used to in- (15) ;.' ject fluids: Drinking Water Act, 42 U.S:C. § 300f et seq. °'1 (a) Brought to the surface in connection with conven- (16) "Underground source of drinking water -,�; �'>> tional oil or natural gas exploration or production and (USDW)" means ground waters which contain fewer ''',§ ; may be commingled with wastewaters from gas plants than 10,000 mg/L of total dissolved solids or which are ,i,1,;;c'I1 which are an integral part of production operations, un- obtainable for beneficial uses. ""] ' less those waters are classified as dangerous wastes at (17) "Waste fluid" means anydiscarded, abandoned, ,-gig 3, g unwanted, or unrecovered fluid(s), except the following •,,t J the time of injection; , (b) For enhanced recovery of oil or natural gas; or are not waste fluids for the purposes of this chapter: t rr} ; v'W. q [Title 173 WAC—p 226] (1986 Ed.) 412 ___derground Injection Control Program 173-218-100 '.' f (a) Discharges into the ground or ground water of re (3)(b) and (3)(c) are not authorized. If it appears likely , 9 turn flow, unaltered except for temperature, from a that approval will be sought for either of these types of 1 ground water heat pump used for space heating or cool- injection wells, these regulations will be amended to in- }, f ing: Provided, That such discharges do not have signifi- elude an appropriate regulatory program. cant potential, either individually or collectively, to [Statutory Authority: RCW 43.21A.445. 84-06-023 (Order DE 84- II affect ground water quality or beneficial uses; 02), § 173-218-060,filed 2/29/84.] 1 (b) Discharges of stormwater that are not contamina- l: ted or potentially contaminated by industrial or corn- WAC 173-218-070 Class III injection wells. At mercial sources. present, there appears to be no reasonable likelihood (18) "Well" means a bored, drilled or driven shaft, or that approval will be sought for a Class III injection #% dug hole whose depth is greater than the largest surface well; therefore, Class III injection wells are not author- ' 'i' dimension. ized. If it appears likely that approval will be sought for t [Statutory Authority: RCW 43.21A.445. 84-06-023 (Order DE 84- a Class III injection well, these regulations will be 02),§ 173-218-030, filed 2/29/84.] amended to include an appropriate regulatory program. ,; zj! [Statutory Authority: RCW 43.21A.445. 84-06-023 (Order DE 84- WAC 173-218-040 Authorization required. No flu- 02), § 173-218-070,filed 2/29/84.] 4 i ids may be injected through wells except as authorized pursuant to this chapter. WAC 173-218-080 Class IV injection wells. Class [Statutory Authority: RCW 43.2IA.445. 84-06-023 (Order DE 84- IV injection wells are prohibited regardless of proximity 02),§ 173-218-040, filed 2/29/84.] to USDW. i I` [Statutory Authority: RCW 43.2IA.445. 84-06-023 (Order DE 84- _ WAC 173-218-050 Class I injection wells. (1) New 02), § 173-218-080,filed 2/29/84.] , Class I injection wells are prohibited. (2) All persons operating an existing Class I injection WAC 173-218-090 Class V injection wells. (1) All well operation must apply to the department for ap- new Class V injection wells that inject industrial, mu- ,, proval to operate within one year of the effective date of nicipal, or commercial waste fluids into or above an I this chapter. USDW are prohibited. (3) The department will accept, process, and act upon (2) All persons operating an existing Class V injection the application in accordance with applicable require- well, that inject industrial, commercial, or municipal ments as contained in 40 Code of Federal Regulations waste fluids into or above an USDW, must apply to the P Parts 124 and 144 as published in Federal Register Vol- department for approval to operate within one year of ume 48, #64 (April 1, 1983) and Part 146 as published the effective date of this regulation. The department will ' in Federal Register Volume 45, #123 (June 24, 1980), accept, process, and act upon the application in accord- Volume 46, #166 (August 27, 1981) and Volume 47, ance with the procedures and practices of the State '#23 (February 3, 1982). waste discharge permit program, chapter 173-216 [Statutory Authority: RCW 43.21A.445. 84-06-023 (Order DE 84- WAC. 02),§ 173-218-050, filed 2/29/84.] (3) All other Class V injection well owners and oper- ators must notify the department of the location of in- WAC 173-218-060 Class II injection wells. (1) Any jection wells within one year of approval of the state person, who proposes to conduct or is conducting a Class underground injection control program by the United II injection well operation, as defined in WAC 173-218- States Environmental Protection Agency. The notifica- 030 (3)(a), must notify the oil and gas conservation tion shall be on a form as prescribed by the department committee (OGCC) in accordance with the provisions of and will include the information needed to satisfy the general rules, chapter 344-12 WAC. requirements of 40 Code of Federal Regulations Part (2) The department shall perform review, evaluation, 146.52. and approval in accordance with the provisions of gen- [Statutory Authority: RCW 43.2IA.445. 84-06-023 (Order DE 84- eral rules, chapter 344-12 WAC. 02), § 173-218-090,filed 2/29/84.] (3) The department shall process a Class II injection well application, as defined in WAC 173-218-030 WAC 173-218-100 Permit terms and conditions. (3)(a), in accordance with applicable requirements as (1) Any permit issued by the department shall specify contained in 40 Code of Federal Regulations Parts 124 conditions necessary to prevent and control injection of and 144 as published in Federal Register Volume 48, fluids into the waters of the state, including the follow- #64 (April 1, 1983) and Part 146 as published in Fed- ing, whenever applicable: eral Register Volume 45, #123 (June 24, 1980), Volume (a) All known, available, and reasonable methods of 1 46, #166 (August 27, 1981) and Volume 47, #23 (Feb- prevention, control, and treatment; ruary 3, 1982). (b) Applicable requirements as contained in 40 Code (4) At present, there appears to be no reasonable of Federal Regulations Parts 124 and 144 as published likelihood that approval will be sought for a Class II in- in Federal Register Volume 48, #64 (April 1, 1983) and jection well for either enhanced recovery of oil or natu- Part 146 as published in Federal Register Volume 45, ral gas or for storage of liquid hydrocarbons; therefore, #123 (June 24, 1980), Volume 46, #166 (August 27, Class II injection wells as defined in 173-218-030 1981) and Volume 47, #23 (February 3, 1982); and (1986 Ed.) [Title 173 WAC-p 227] 173-218-100 Title 173 WAC: Ecology, Department a ;;? kl, }tip: (c) Anyconditions necessarytopreserve andt:y protect 402 Of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act +,1��.:, USDW. ;f:;i;, (FWPCA). Permits issued under this chapter are de- t� ' (2) Any injection well that causes or allows the move- signed to satisfy the requirements for discharge permits lief;,. ment of fluid into an USDW that may result in a viola- under both section 402(b) of the FWPCA and chapter b"`•- tion of any primary drinking water standard under 40 90.48 RCW. P `''4"'' Code of Federal Regulations Part 141 or that may .• [Order DE 74-1, § 173-220-010, filed 2/15/74.] t.,., otherwise adversely affect the beneficial use of an t}.,;,; USDW is prohibited. r;,),, t;fr,, [Statutory Authority: RCW 43.21A.445. 84-06--023 (Order DE 84- WAC 173-220-020 Permit required. No pollutants / / ] or other wastes or substances shall be discharged di- '` 02), § 173-218-100,filed 2 29 84. 5; rectly to any navigable water of the state from a point ;;- WAC 173-218-110 Enforcement. (1) For violations source, except as authorized by an individual or general ,01:14 issuedpursuant to this d`"6: of this chapter, the department shall have the remedies permitchapter. c ;;,1_available in the Water Pollution Control Act, chapter [Statutory Authority: RCW 90.48.035 and 90.48.260. 82-24-078 (Or- ; r7 `, 90.48 RCW, and all other applicable statutes. der DE 82-39), § 173-220-020, filed 12/1/82; Order DE 74-I, § ir.F:a (2) All injection well operations not operated in ac- 173-220-020, filed 2/15/74.] - •. t11cordance with the provisions of this chapter, that cause ';;!3r; or tend to cause entry of fluids into the waters of the WAC 173-220-030 Definitions. For purposes of this � '`4�' Viz.. state as a result of a violation of these provisions, consti- chapter, the following definitions shall be applicable: � ���.; tutes pollution of the waters of the state in violation of (1) "Department" means department of ecology. ,fP.ki1 RCW 90.48.080. ,;"':';`• (2) "Director" means the director of the department �f��;�����; [Statutory Authority: RCW 43.21A.445. 84-06-023 (Order DE 84- 'of ecology or his authorized representative. .4;Ai,; 02), § 173-218-110,filed 2/29/84.] (3) "Administrator" means the administrator of the 'tar, United States Environmental Protection Agency. r''w jj� (4) "Regional administrator" means the regional ad- 'i,ei Chapter 173-220 WAC ministrator of Region X of the Environmental Protection ,'•,roar:'`'. NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE Agency (EPA). c' '�1` ELIMINATION SYSTEM PERMIT PROGRAM (5) "Point source" means any discernible, confined ; 571;l and discrete conveyance, including but not limited to -[' i WAC ,R`[',,; any pipe, ditch, channel, tunnel, conduit, well, discrete ,�. I 173-220-010 Purpose. fissure, container, rolling stock, concentrated animal . :,i, 173-220-020 Permit required. '' o4t } r,•4f • feeding operation, or vessel or other floatingcraft, from '1 ., 173-220-030 Definitions. �04��;„ 173-220-040 Application for permit. which pollutants are or may be discharged. This term ,' ? �,• {x'F 173-220-045 General permits. dots not include return flows from irrigated agriculture. A ;dry; 173-220-050 Public notice. (6) "Pollutant" means dredged spoil, solid waste in- '•'t,;, , 173-220-060 Fact sheets. cinerator residue, sewage, garbage, sewage sludge, emu- '• h �. 173-220-070 Notice to other government agencies. 173-220-080 Public access to information. g. nitions, chemical wastes, biological materials, radioactive .;a:•�. 173-220-090 Public hearings. materials, heat, wrecked or discarded equipment, rock, t 'fl' 173-220-100 Public notice of public hearings. sand, cellar dirt and industrial, municipal and a ricul- 173-220-110 Permit preparation. P g rt�k;t. tural waste discharged into water. This term does not r, '•V 173-220-120 Prohibited discharges. `+, 173-220-130 Effluent limitations,water quality standards and include sewage from vessels within the meaning of sec- •'•i „6. other requirements for permits. tion 312 of the FWPCA nor does it include dredged or f' 1'17`. 173 220-135 Signing of permits. permit :0, fill material discharged in accordance with a is- ?-,., ;;4 173-220-140 Schedules of compliance. sued under section 404 of the FWPCA. wmrr 173-220-150 Other terms and conditions. (#'. 173-220-160 Transmission to regional administrator of issued (7) "Navigable waters of the state means all naviga- ,�;;t°., permit. k', P ble waters as defined in section 502 of the FWPCA , ,41,. 173-220-170 Relationship with non-NPDES permits. within the boundaries of the state such as lakes, rivers. ',,a,. ;, 173-220-180 Duration and replacement of existing permit. t ponds streams inland waters ocean bays, estuaries ;rl:: 173-220-1908 Modification,suspension,and revocation ofpermit. permits. Y 1101 , 173-220-200 Transfer of permit. sounds and inlets. •t; 4,01 173-220-210 Monitoring,recording and reporting. (8) "Person" includes any olitical subdivision, local, 173-220-220 Control of disposal of pollutants into wells. state, or federal government agency, municipality, in- `"' alp' 173-220-225 Appeals. . }! 173-220-230 Enforcement dustry, public or private corporation, partnership, asso- ;,k' 173-220-240 Relationship of department of ecology to permits is- ciation, firm, individual, or any other entity whatsoever. ". `i' sued by the energy facility site evaluation council. (9) "Discharge of pollutant" and the term "discharge 4s` of pollutants" each means (a) any addition of any pollu- "' "I'}? WAC 173-220-010 Purpose. The purpose of this tant or combination of pollutants to navigable waters of ;, =, chapter is to establish a state permit program, applicable the state from any point source, (b) anyaddition of anyJ 'l'y'J �;t�,tf. ,�; to the discharge of pollutants and other wastes and ma- pollutant or combination of pollutants to the waters of •,11.1 4;1, terials to the navigable waters of the state, operating the contiguous zone or the ocean from any point source, ,• w5"�I. under state law as a part of the National Pollutant Dis- other than a vessel or other floating craft which is being "•; ', `w: charge Elimination System (NPDES) created by section used as a means of transportation. ty „:}[ r,,,W �i [Title 173 WAC—p 228] "'' : Rt (1986 Ed.) +,(,Vi•s: i1111' 4r1,4,44,00-1.-4,a.a.,.r,w.,.,,,,,,-o,14 ^!ss.,, ;<✓.!s•.i.4.•e.:.,. ..a.+ • -H?'at e.,p4: ,.4 ,', ._ c. vi '' CITY OF RENTON SA�..r BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director February 8, 1988 Service Corporation of Washington 350 Monroe Avenue N.E. Renton, Washington 98056 RE: Service Corporation of Washington, File SP-076-87 Dear Sirs: This letter is to inform you that the Environmental Review Committee completed their review of the environmental impacts of your special permit request for property located at 350 Monroe Avenue N.E. The Committee on February 3, 1988 decided to revise their Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated with the following conditions: 1. That the applicant work with the City of Renton . Police Department and the Public Works Department to determine acceptable haul routes. 2 . That the applicant contact the Seattle/King County Health Department to ensure that the fill material to be placed on the site is properly inspected and tested to ensure that it is acceptable and poses little or no risk to the City's drinking water supply. 3 . That the fill material contain only minor amounts of organic substances and shall have rock or similar irreducible material with a maximum dimension no greater than eight (8) inches in diameter pursuant to City ordinance. 4 . That the fill material not contain soluble poisons or other leachable compounds * (including all petroleum based substances including distillates and asphalt) which may have the potential for contaminating the City's drinking water. 5. That the applicant contract with an EPA approved testing lab --- to monitor the site and to provide monthly reports on the types of fill material being deposited on the site and the results of leachate monitoring tests. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 • v ` i 1 Service Corporation of Washington February 8, 1988 NOTE: Such tests shall be carried out at least four times a year and shall include analysis for heavy metals, petroleum distillates and other probable contaminants. The results of these tests will be transmitted to Ron Olsen, Utility Engineer, Renton Department of Public Works and Greg Bishop, Environmental Control Section, Seattle/King County Health Department. 6. That the applicant provide at least two monitoring wells on site (one uphill and one downhill) that go down to the hardpan. 7. That the applicant replace the vegetation in the 30 foot setback along the eastern and southern boundaries of the site with similar species of equal size. 8. That the applicant post a $5,000 cash bond for street cleaning. 9. That the hours of operation be from 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Monday through Friday for entire site; 7: 00 p.m. to 10: 00 p.m. Monday through Friday for Phase 2 only; and 10: 00 a.m. to 6 p.m. on Saturdays. 10. That the applicant provide vehicle cleanup facilities including wheel wash down areas and sedimentation ponds on- site in addition to the existing concrete apron. 11. That a minimum six (6) foot high view obscuring fence be installed around the fill site. 12 . That the applicant provide a performance bond or similar guarantee acceptable to the City Attorney for an amount of $10,000 to cover street cleanup or damages to vehicles attributable to the proposed use. 13 . That the applicant provide the City with a copy of the contractor's contract which shall include the conditions of the Environmental Review Committee, the Hearing Examiner (if any) , and the recommendations of the Geotechnical Engineer dated March 1987. This report shall be submitted to the City prior to the issuance of the annual license. Because the Environmental Review Committee revised the Determination for this project, there is a required fourteen (14) day appeal period which will end February 22, 1988. Appeals are made to the City's Hearing Examiner. . Service Corporation of Washington February 8, 1988 If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call our office at 235-2550 and ask for myself or Jeanette Samek-McKague. For the Enviro == to eview Committee. 1/L. i / i k o (;:::::::) Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE: ENviRoNm E ;‘ , TAL EcLARATION APPLICATION NO. SP-076-87 ECF-066-87 APPLICANT SERVICE CORPORATION OF WASHINGTON (GREENWOOD CEMETERY GRAVE PIT) PROPOSED ACTION APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT FOR FILL AND GRADE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE EXTENSION OF AN EXISTING PERMIT (SP-048-85) WHICH WILL ALLOW COMPLETION OF FILL OPERATIONS AND RESTORATION OF THE SITE. THE WORK IS TO INCLUDE 142, 000 CUBIC YARDS OF REMOVAL AND 295, 000 C.Y. OF FIL GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS LOCATED AT :350 MONROE AVENUE N.E. POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (E.R.C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES ► ~ DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL ► ,. ILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M.,]EBRUARY 22, 1988 , FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION. NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of NON- SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED for the following project(s) under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. The Applicant(s) have completed a mitigation process pursuant to WAC 197-11- 350. SERVICE CORPORATION OF WASHINGTON (GREENWOOD CEMETERY GRAVEL PIT) Application for special permit for fill and grade permit to allow the extension of an existing permit (SP-048-85) which will allow completion of fill operations and restoration of the site. The work is to include 142,000 cubic yards of removal and 295,000 cubic yards of fill. Property located at 350 Monroe Avenue N.E. File Nos.: ECF-066-87 and SP-076-87. Further information regarding this action is available in the Building and Zoning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2540. Any appeal of ERC action must be filed with the City of Renton Hearing Examiner by February 22, 1988. Published: February 8, 1988 Bo „EVARD EXCAVATING, NC. 6,Dx), At!�+° --. 11065 PACIFIC HWY. S. l i � j1 P. 0. BOX 68/2,8 • SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98188 762-0650 • January 14, 1987 • Envronmental Review Committee Building and Zoning Dept . 200 Mill Ave . South Renton, WA. 98055 Dear Sirs : In review to Application # SP-076-87 Condition # 9 , I sent a letter requesting extended hours of 7 to 3 and 6 to 10 Monday thru Friday. However I neglected to notify you on perhaps Saturday work also . I would appreciate hours of 8 to 4 on Saturday. Given the opportunity to work Saturday would increase our production and would not create any traffic problems due to the decrease of traffic on Saturday. Res ctfully: James K. Donovan Estimator • cc :JKD g.,x. v r?$ F� { yam R rr J -4 T. ANDREA BEATTY RINIKER "` ."' '/1II 263 Director �yz 1889 a0Y STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Mail Stop PV-11 • Olympia, Washington 98504-8711 • (206) 459-6000 January 12, 1988 POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF RENTON JAN i 5 1988 ] Environmental Review CommitteeECE R�} (� J City of Renton U 15 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Dear Sirs: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the determination of nonsignificance for the Greenwood Cemetery Gravel Pit (ECF-066-87) . We reviewed the environmental checklist and have the following comments . Any injections of waters into the ground will come under the regulations of the Underground Injection Control Program, Chapter 173-218 WAC. If you have any questions, please call Mr. Robert Newman of the Northwest Regional Office at (206) 867-7046. Sincerely, Barbara J. Ritchie Environmental Review Section BJR: cc: Marlene Wylie, NWRO L 1 CITY OF RENTON RECEIVED LAaoaa j JAN 15 1988 BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. 40>3 v-`Gz„..---r ® ,L.EVARD EXCAVATING, INC. �O�E ,____IM . l 11065 PACIFIC HWY. S. tW��t 'a' "" ' P. 0. BOX 68/28 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98188 762-0650 January 14, 1987 Envronmental Review Committee Building and Zoning Dept . 200 Mill Ave . South Renton, WA. 98055 g` L 4/ Dear Sirs : VO In review to Application # SP-076-87 Cond • tion # 9 , I sent a letter requesting extended hours of to 3 and (.. 51 ,to 10 Monday thru Friday. However I neglected to notify you on perhaps Saturday work also . I would appreciate hours of 8 to 4 on Saturday. Given the opportunity to work Saturday would increase et our production and would not create any traffic problems due to the decrease of traffic on Saturday. /� Res ctfull : y V g James K. Donovan - Estimator._ ____ QtN....:. : "?=,k`'— 314.. rn-/ c c : J K D "�'��eJf�.► (Vt.fh►^Miq/. /19 IA,— 1'0 p,,, C, a 6. G : 1A. 111- 5-: 7 ;•-. is, i1L.1.J!_,k.; . t.... %- - - .i i . • : . ' ' -OT • ENviRoNmENTAL DEcLARATION „. . • APPLICATION NO, ECF-066-87; SP-076-87 APPLICANT SERVICE CORP . OF WA. (GREENWOOD CEMETERY GRAVEL PIT) PROPOSED ACTION\PPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT FOR AFILL AND GRADE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE EXTENSION OF AN EXISTING PERMIT (SP-048-85) WHICH WILL ALLOW COMPLETION OF. FILL OPERATIONS AND RESTORATION OF THE SITE . THE WORK IS TO INCLUDE 142, 000 CUBIC YARDS OF REMOVAL AND 295,000 CUBIC YARDS OF FILL. • GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS 350 MoNROE AVE. N.E. POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. • THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (E.R.C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE • PROPOSED ACTION DOES V.In DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL • EX WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 1.5 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON. HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., JAN. 25, 1988 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION. J - l Public Notice NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON,WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee Audrey Benner ,being first duly sworn on oath states (ERC) has issued a Determination of NON- SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED for the follow- that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the ing project(s) under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. The Appi.;.int(s) have completed a mitigation processnavn$- VALLEY DAILY NEWS ant to WAC 197-11-350. our SERVICE CORPORATION OF WASH- • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition INGTON (GREENWOOD CEMETERY GRAVEL PIT) Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week.That said newspapers Application for special permit for fill and are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six grade permit to allow th5 extensionhich of an existing permit(SP-048-85)which will allow months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published completion of fill operations and restoration in the English language continuallyas dailynewspapers in Kingof the site.rd The work is to include95, 0 cubic gKent, cubic yards of removal and 295,000 cubic County,Washington.The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal yards of fill. Property located at 350 Mon- newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for roe Avenue N.E. File Nos.: ECF•066-87 and SP-076-87. King County. Further information regarding this action is available in the Building and Zoning The notice in the exact form attached,waspublished in the Kent Edition Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2540. Any appeal of ERC , Renton Edition X , Auburn Edition , (and not in action must be filed with the City of Renton 988. supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers Hearingu ExaminereitheValleyy Dailyary 25,N News PP g y Published in News Janu- during the below stated period.The annexed notice a ary 11, 1988 R2739. i4ocic of iLvironraantal Detanmination waspublishedon January 11 , 19t>o 1:273y • The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $22 .40 Subscribed and sworn to before this day of January 19 Nota Public for the State of Washington, 4 N',�`�'� • residing at Federal Way, �/ L King County, Washington. • VDN#87 Revised 11/86 11 t:. • / Z;�rflNG DEFT. NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of NON- SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED for the following project(s) under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. The Applicant(s) have completed a mitigation process pursuant to WAC 197-11- 350. SERVICE CORPORATION OF WASHINGTON (GREENWOOD CEMETERY GRAVEL PIT) Application for special permit for fill and grade permit to allow the extension of an existing permit (SP-048-85) which will allow completion of fill operations and restoration of the site. The work is to include 142,000 cubic yards of removal and 295,000 cubic yards of fill. Property located at 350 Monroe Avenue N.E. File Nos.: ECF-066-87 and SP-076-87. Further information regarding this action is available in the Building and Zoning Department, _ , Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2540. Any appeal of ERC action must be filed with the City of Renton Hearing Examiner by January 25, 1988. Published: January i 1, 1988 s-1o' 7 • • • • Nzu0 va i SFr E30—- EVARD EXCAVATING, 2.d NC. '.. ��ti.. 11065 PACIFIC HWY. S. L�?;,iv. k., y'' . •• P. 0. BOX 68 I7 8 �' SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98188 762-0650 OFegY TO WE CEPVE � January 4, 1988 i( ;��if 10 4 9 ID BUIk IS G/ZONING DEPT. City of Renton Attn: Don Erickson • RE: Special permit #SP-076-87, Enviroment Checklist condition 9 Hours of Operation Dear Mr. Erickson In your checklist you have stated hours of operation as 8:30 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. Monday thru Friday. we would like to apply for extended hours of 7:00 A.M. to 3:00 P.M. and 6:00 P.M. to 10:00 P.M. Monday thru Friday. Since we area union house we find it very difficult and costly to operate on'a 6 hour day. We would be using Monroe as an access road which has excellent traffic control. At an estimate of 7 to 9 trucks per hour we feel that Monroe should be able to handle that with no problem. Our first objective is to have an 8 hour operating day shift as do the other filling operations in the area, secondly having an option to work a half shift at night. Respectfully yours; • James K. Donovan Estimator • cc:JKD _ Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle CITY OF RENTON :mE Exchange Building • 821 Second Ave. • Seattle,WA 98104-1598 lECEDVE1 JAN 51'38 December 31, 1987 BUILDING /ZONING DEPT., Environmental Review Committee Building & Zoning Department 200 Mill Avenue S. Renton, Washington 98055 Attention: Donald Erickson, Zoning Administration Determination of Non-Significance File No: SP-076-87 Service Corportation of Washington Dear Members of the Committee: Metro staff has reviewed this proposal and anticipates no significant impacts to its wastewater facilities or public transportation services. - Metro supports the mitigation conditions identified in this DNS dl serving to protect surface and ground water quality. Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment. Sincerely, Gregory M. Bush, Manager Environmental Planning Division GMB:jmg CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO. : ECF-066-8`7 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SP-076-87 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for special permit for fill and grade permit to allow the extension of an existing permit (SP- 048-85) which will allow completion of fill operations and restoration of the site. The work is to include 142,000 cubic yards of removal and 295, 000 cubic yards of fill. PROPONENT: Service Corporation of Washington LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Property located at 350 Monroe Avenue N.E. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Building and Zoning Department The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2) (c) . This decision was made after review of an expanded environmental checklist and preliminary site plan, on file with the lead agency. Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-2822 (D) Renton Municipal Code (see attached sheet) . These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340. The lead agency will not act on this proposal for fifteen (15) days from December 21, D1987. Any interested -party may submit written comments which must be submitted by 5: 00 p.m. January 4, 1988, in order to be considered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period will commence following the finalization of the DNS. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA • 98055 Phone: 235-2500 DATE OF DECISION: December 16, 1987 EFFECTIVE DATE: December 21, 1987 A /lie. ► Ronald G. Nelson .f, ry it Spri,ger Building and Zoning Director :• icy i,-velo,l, ent Director Ric and C. oughton Public Works Director DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE ' MITIGATION MEASURES PROJECT: Greenwood Cemetery Gravel Pit ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF-066-87 APPLICATION NO. : SP-076-87 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for special permit for fill and grade permit to allow the extension of an existing permit (SP-048-85) which will allow completion of fill operations and restoration of the site. The work is to include 142, 000 cubic yards of removal and 295, 000 cubic yards of fill. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Property located at 350 Monroe Avenue N.E. CONDITIONS:. 1. That the applicant work with the City of Renton Police Department and the Public Works Department to determine acceptable haul routes. 2. That the applicant contact the Seattle/King County Health Department to ensure that the fill material to be placed on the site is properly inspected and tested to ensure that it is acceptable and poses little or no risk to the City's drinking water supply. 3 . That the fill material contain only minor amounts of organic substances and shall have rock or similar irreducible material with a maximum dimension no greater than eight (8) inches in diameter pursuant to City ordinance. 4. That the fill material not contain soluble poisons or other leachable compounds (including all petroleum based substances including distillates and asphalt) which may have the potential for contaminating the City's drinking water. 5. That the applicant contract with an EPA approved testing lab to monitor the site and to provide monthly reports on the types of fill material being deposited on the site and the results of leachate monitoring tests. NOTE: Such tests shall be carried out at least four times a year and shall include analysis for heavy metals, petroleum distillates and other probable contaminants. The results of these tests will be transmitted to Ron Olsen, Utility Engineer, Renton Department of Public Works and Greg Bishop, Environmental Control Section, Seattle/King County Health Department. 6. That the 'applicant provide at least two monitoring wells on site (one uphill and one downhill) that go down to the hardpan. 7. That the applicant replace the vegetation in the 30 foot setback along the eastern and southern boundaries of the site with similar species of equal size. 8. That the applicant post a $5, 000 cash bond for street cleaning. 9. That the hours of operation be from 8:30 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. Monday through Friday. 10. That the applicant provide vehicle cleanup facilities including wheel wash down areas and sedimentation ponds on-site in addition to the existing concrete apron. 11. That a minimum six (6) foot high view obscuring fence be installed around the fill site. 12. That the applicant provide a performance bond or similar guarantee acceptable to the City Attorney for an amount of. $10,000 to cover street cleanup or damages to vehicles attributable to the proposed use. - • N OT I E ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION APPLICATION NO. ECF-066-87. APPLICANT SERVICE CORPORATION OF WASHINGTON (GREENWOOD CEMETERY GRAVEL PIT) PROPOSED ACTION APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT FOR FILL AND GRADE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE EXTENSION OF AN EXISTING PERMIT (SP-048-85) WHICH TO ALLOW COMPLETION OF FILL OPERATIONS AND RESTORATION OF THE SITE . THE WORK IS TO INCLUDE 295, 000 CB . YDS . OF FILL . GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS PROPERTY LOCATED AT 350 MONROE AVENUE N . E . POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (E.R.C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES XDOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL j_? WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY S :UOPM JANUARY 4, 138 AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION. OF R4,A. � Lc 0 ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR � � MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 09 � 0 9:.b. SEPT,IA BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR December 21, 1987 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section Mail Stop PV-11 Olympia, WA 98504 RE: Service Corporation of Washington, Greenwood Cemetery Gravel Pit Dear Sirs: Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Determination of Non- Significance - Mitigated and Mitigation Measures for application for special permit for fill and grade permit to allow the extension of an existing permit (SP-048-85) , file nos. : ECF-066-87 and SP- 076-87 . If you have any questions, please call me at 235-2550. Sincerely, OVA()/ 7.< —) 1 4 Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator Enclosure DE: cs OF R4 �y ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR ZisiL 0, ONEIM 09 � MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 06)grEQ SEPT "�0�P BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR December 21, 1987 Service Corporation of Washington 350 Monroe Ave. N.E. Renton, WA 98056 RE: Service Corporation of Washington, Greenwood Cemetery Gravel Pit Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Determination of Non- Significance - Mitigated and Mitigation Measures for application for fill and grade permit to allow the extension of an existing permit (SP-048-85) , file nos. : ECF-066-87 and SP-076-87 . If you have any questions, please call me at 235-2550. Sincerely, /z<-/-7)Wi,t Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator Enclosure DE:cs I OF 4 j©. ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR NAL p MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 O �P 17FD SEPl-�OG BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR December 21, 1987 John R. Ewing and Assoicates Attention: Granville Horn 1314 S. Central, Suite 200 Kent, WA 98032 RE: Service Corporation of Washington, Greenwood Cemetery Gravel Pit Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Determination of Non- Significance - Mitigated and Mitigation Measures for application for fill and grade permit to allow the extension of an existing permit (SP-048-85) , file nos. : ECF-066-87 and SP-076-87 . If you have any questions, please call me at 235-2550. Sincerely, (7_117;j Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator Enclosure DE: cs pF ?4,A I► ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR rn 09 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 co- 09 . P qr SEPTEMB BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR December 21, 1987 Gregory M. Bush, Manager Environmental Review Division METRO 821 2nd Avenue, M.S. #92 Seattle, WA 98104 RE: Service Corporation of Washington, Greenwood Cemetery Gravel Pit Dear Mr. Bush: Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Determination of Non- Significance - Mitigated and Mitigation Measures for application for special permit for fill and grade permit to allow the extension of an existing permit (SP-048-85) , file nos. : ECF-066-87 and SP- 076-87 . If you have any questions, please call me at 235-2550. Sincerely, CDovkA,A Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator Enclosure DE:cs I OF R4L BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR 09 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 0,9gTQD SEPSE���P BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR December 21, 1987 Mr. Gerald W. Marbett Building and Land Dev. Div. 450 King County Admin. Bldg. Seattle, WA 98104 RE: Service Corporation of Washington, Greenwood Cemetery Gravel Pit Dear Mr. Marbett: Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Determination of Non- Significance - Mitigated and Mitigation Measures for application for special permit for fill and grade permit to allow the extension of an existing permit (SP-048-85) , file nos. : ECF-066-87 and SP- 076-87 . If you have any questions, please call me at 235-2550. Sincerely, ( • Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator Enclosure DE:cs • NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION RENTON,WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non- Audrey Ee nne r ,being first duly sworn on oath states Significance — Mitigated for the following that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the project(s) under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. The Applicant(s) have completed a mitigation process pursuant to 197-1 VALLEY DAILY NEWS WAC SERVICE E C1-35O. ORPORATION OF WASH- INGTON• Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition GRAVEL (GREENWOOD CEMETERY GRAVEL PIT) Application for special permit for fill and Daily newspapers published six (6)times a week.That said newspapers grade permit to allow the extension of an are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six existing permit (SP-048-85)which will allow monthsprior to the date ofpublication referred to,printed andpublished completionf hesite. Theo fill operations isto clu restoration12,0 of the site. work is include 142,000 in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King cubic yards of removal and 295,000 cubic County,Washington.The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal yards of fill. Property located at 350 Monroe Avenue N.E., File No. ECF-066-87. newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for This decision will be finalized in 15 days. King County. Written comments received after 5:00 P.M. January 4, 1988, will not be considered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period will com- The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the Kent Edition mence following the finalization of DNS. TRenton Edition X Auburn EditionCityhe mitigation measures imposed ey the (and not in of Renton's Environmental Review supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers Committee are available at the Building and duringthe below statedperiod.The annexed notice a Rentonng Department,PhMone l Building, Renton,Washington. Phone 235-2540. Published 198 R2682 17. the Valley Daily News Dec. 21 was published on December 21, 1987 x2682 The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $ 25 .60 • Subscribed and sworn to before me this 2 3rday of Do c 1987_ l Notar ublic for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, King County, Washington. VDN#87 Revised 11 86 NotEnvDet/Dskl SerCorp NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated for the following projects) under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. The Applicant(s) have completed a mitigation process pursuant to WAC 197-11-350. SERn1ICE CORPORATION OF WASHINGTON (GREENWOOD CEMETERY GRAVEL PIT) Application for special permit for fill and grade permit to allow the extension of an existing permit (SP-048-85) which will allow completion of fill operations and restoration of the site. The work is to include 142, 000 cubic yards of removal and 295,000 cubic yards of fill. Property located at 350 Monroe Avenue N.E. , File No. ECF- 066-87. This decision will be finalized in 15 days. Written comments received after 5:00 P.M. January 4, 1988, will not be considered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period will commence following the finalization of DNS. The mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Building and Zoning Department, Municipal. Building, Renton, Washington. Phone 235-2540. Published: December 21, 1987 41540, • BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE STAFF REPORT DECEMBER 16, 1987 A. BACKGROUND: APPLICANT: Service Corporation of Washington PROJECT: Greenwood Cemetery Gravel Pit ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF-066-87 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for special permit for fill and grade permit to allow the extension of an existing permit (SP-048-85) which will allow completion of fill operations and restoration of the site. The work is to include 142, 000 cubic yards of removal and 295,000 cubic yards of fill. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Property located at 350 Monroe Avenue N.E. B. ISSUES: Whether sufficient information has been provided on the source of the fill material; Whether sufficient information and measures have been provided to ensure protection of the aquifer recharge area and minimize siltation; Whether sufficient information has been provided with respect to measures that will be taken to protect the aquifer; Whether sufficient information has been provided on measures to minimize impacts on the surrounding area. C. ANALYSIS: The amount of excavation and fill will equate to approximately 24,000 truck loads of material or approximately 50 truck trips per day. Although not significant by itself, the accumulative effects of this and similar operations in the area on vehicular traffic is a concern. D: RECOMMENDATIONS: Recommend that the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination of Non- Significance - Mitigated with the following conditions: 1. That the applicant work with the City of Renton Police Department and the Public Works Department to determine acceptable haul routes. BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW [MITTEE STAFF REPORT SERVICE CORPORATION OF WASHINGTON GREENWOOD CEMETERY GRAVEL PIT DECEMBER 16, 1987 PAGE 2 2 . That the applicant contact the Seattle/King County Health Department to ensure that the fill material to be placed on the site is properly inspected and tested to ensure that it is acceptable and poses little or no risk to the City's drinking water supply. 3. That the fill material contain only minor amounts of organic substances and shall have rock or similar irreducible material with a maximum dimension no greater than eight (8) inches in diameter pursuant to City ordinance. 4. That the fill material not contain soluble poisons or other leachable compounds (including all petroleum based substances including distilates and asphalt) which may have the potential for contaminating the City's drinking water. 5. That the applicant contract with an EPA approved testing lab to monitor the site and to provide monthly reports on the types of fill material being deposited on the site and the results of leachate monitoring tests. riOTE: Such tests shall be carried out • at least four times a year and shall include anaysis for heavy metals, petroleum distillates and other propbable contaminents. The results of these tests will be transmitted to Ron Olsen, Utility Engineer, Renton Department of Public Works and Greg Bishop, Environmental Control Section, Seattle/King County Health Department. 6. That the applicant provide at least two monitoring wells on site (one uphill and one downhill) that go down to the hardpan. 7. That the applicant replace the vegetation in the 30 foot setback along the eastern and southern boundaries of the site with similar species of equal size. 8. That the applicant post a $5, 000 cash bond for street cleaning. 9. That the hours of operation be from 8:30 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. Monday through Friday. 10. That the applicant. provide vehicle cleanup facilities including wheel wash down areas and sedimentation ponds on-site in . addition to the existing concrete apron. BUILDING AND ZONING D 'RTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW 1 - .MITTEE STAFF REPORT SERVICE CORPORATION OF WASHINGTON GREENWOOD CEMETERY GRAVEL PIT DECEMBER 16, 1987 PAGE 3 11. That a minimum six (6) foot high view obscuring fence be installed around the fill site. 12. That the applicant provide a performance bond or similar guarantee acceptable to the City Attorney for , an amount of $10,000 to cover street ‘k, cleanup or damages to vehicles attributable to the proposed use. D. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS: Various City departments have reviewed and commented upon the project. These comments are as follows: Police Department: Following conditions were recommended: 1. Applicant hire an off duty Renton Police officer to monitor the job site at all times it is in operation to ensure compliance with the Hearing Examiner's decision and City Codes. 2 . A screening fence at least four feet high be placed all the way around the site. 3. A wheel washing station be installed and every truck that leaves the site has to be washed so it is clean of all dirt and mud. 4. A street washer with operator in the cab be present at all times to clean the street if needed. 5. Maintain the same hauling hours as the previous permit. 6. No weekend work in the pit. 7. Posting of a $10,000 cash bond with th city to pay for any clean up that the contractor does not accomplish. 8. No tracking of dirt and/or mud onto the street at all. Fire Prevention Bureau: No comments. Design Engineering: Design Engineering provided the following comment: • Ground water monitoring wells should be installed once the City decides how, where, and who will coordinate and direct program. Traffic Engineering: Traffic Engineering provided the following comment: n Bonding needed for street cleaning required. BUILDING AND ZONING DFP RTMENT A ' ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ( MITTEE STAFF REPORT SERVICE CORPORATION OF WASHINGTON GREENWOOD CEMETERY GRAVEL PIT DECEMBER 16, 1987 PAGE 4 Utility Engineering: Utility Engineering provided the following comment: Must address fill in relationship to aquifer in aquifer protection area. Parks and Recreation: Building Division: No comments. Zoning Division: Policy Development: The Policy Development Department provided the following comments: 1. What is the source of the fill? 2. The same conditions placed on the previous special permit (SP-048-85) should also be required of this permit. 3. This department does not support the requested extension of hours of operation. 4. Are the proposed sedimentation control measures adequate to. insure protection of the aquifer? / r 110 I' E R 0 F F ICE ME . fi'.9e26--i; • TO: pitypi n DATE: j i FROM: 0,fl i i,46 07...,,l_.__‘___ • SUBJECT: 4 / . „I 7wiaini v ./ r (7 S .,6,,,, ) A,22 ) . d/rwr P/Cht-0. A4°Pgifri ,,--- -y ), , ' d-,---- ) — _),.),/-c7) i„,-/A-2/,/, 47t:, va/ 73 '/7,a 01 ,c:/_):,- /- _,,,,„, - tviv) a .,/, , 1 ,,,- , • ... ,, 4.( iy, OM/ 1.11. - Ati21 rtW.741m4, - id Y/ ._.,-- 7, c' // '_1 i v7 i '0 .,/,004 / . I - LO _..-.4_ . ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE 10:00 A.M. Renton Municipal Building December 2, 1987 3rd Floor Conference Room MINUTES ATTENDING: Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator; Larry Springer, Policy Development Director; Dick Houghton, Public Works Director; Jim Hanson, Assistant Building Director; Mike Parness, Mayor's Assistant; Jeanette Samek-McKague, Associate Planner; Lenora Blauman, Assistant Planner; Carolyn Sundvall, Recording Secretary. 1. PENDING PROJECTS: DAVID WILLET ECF-077-87, SA-088-87 Application for site plan approval to allow an eight-unit apartment building. Property located at 354 Taylor Avenue N.W. Don Erickson stated he had not heard back from the applicant on the discrepancy on this project. Action will be deferred until the applicant responds. SERVICE CORPORATION OF WASHINGTON (GREENWOOD CEMETERY GRAVEL PIT) ECF-066-87 Application for special permit for fill and grade permit to allow the extension of an existing permit (SP-048-85) which will allow completion of fill operations and restoration of the site. The work is to include 142,000 cubic yards of removal and 295,000 cubic yards of fill. Property located at 350 Monroe Avenue N.E. Don Erickson stated he was waiting for a return call from Greg Bishop, King County Health Department, on a contractual arrangement to see if the county would be willing to contract with the private sector and monitor the fill material. Project was deferred until King County responded. FIRST CITY EQUITIES (BLACKRIVER CORPORATE PARK PHASES IV & V) ECF- 078-76, SA-090-87, SM-013-87 Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of two three-story buildings having 74,000 sq. ft. each and for two one-story buildings having 30,750 sq. ft. and 19,000 sq. ft. and for substantial shorelines development permit to allow said development within 200 feet of P-1 channel. Property located south of S.W. 7th Street and east of Oakesdale Avenue S.W. DISCUSSION: Erickson had talked with David Shuman and Barbara Moss. A summary letter of the meeting, signed by Larry Springer and Ron Nelson, was sent to the Dept. of Ecology. Larry Springer had talked with Larry Warren regarding the meeting, Warren suggested acting on it as soon as the Committee heard from DOE. Lenora Blauman is reviewing tapes from Council and portions will be transcribed. 2. CONTINUED PROJECTS: ARCO AM/PM MINI MART ECF-056-87, CU-065-87 Conditional Use Permit to allow construction of an AM/PM Mini Mart with gasoline sales. The project will include the construction of a 2,480 sq. ft. building with a 30' x 53' canopy with two split 32' pump islands for gasoline sales, with three 12,000 gallon double containment underground storage tanks. Site includes 13 parking stalls, landscaping and a free-standing sign. Property located on the Northwest corner of the intersection of Sunset Boulevard and Duvall Avenue Northeast. Environmental Review Committee December 2, 1987 Page 2 DISCUSSION: Erickson reviewed the concerns stated in the Issues section of the Staff Report. Since this project is a "Gateway to the City" and higher standards would apply, Erickson expressed concern about the quality of the design i.e. red tile roof and the Spanish influence, which would not blend with surrounding properties. Discussion followed on the property to the North. Erickson stated it is the applicants intent to short plat the 18,000 sq. ft. lot. Joint access and joint parking was discussed. Don stated we should be doing Site Plan Review and Conditional Use for the Gas pumps. Larry Springer raised the issue of getting a Conditional Use Site Plan and Short Plat. Jim Hanson suggested ERC make a recommendation to the Hearing Examiner on the short plat so that when the short plat develops even if it is to small, it comes back through administrative site plan approval to coordinate it with the southern parcel. Larry Springer suggested postponing for one week to come up with strategy Don suggested the applicant come up with a conceptual site plan for the residual parcel coordinating vehicle and pedestrian access to both sites, to be written in as condition #8. Dick Houghton suggested a covenant asking that the architectural styles be similar. DECISION: Larry Springer moved that we continue discussion after condition number 8 is on the staff report. Dick Houghton seconded the motion. Dick Houghton wanted circulation and compatibility to be a condition. Larry Springer made a motion to reword recommendation number 5 that prohibits development of the excess parcel. Don suggested two approaches: 1. Larry's motion to delete "until such time as developed"; the strategy being a covenant to maintain that residual parcel as open space. 2. Leave recommendation 5 as it is and add number 8 stating "the applicant develop a conceptual site plan for the residual parcel coordinating both pedestrian and vehicle access". Dick Houghton made a motion to add recommendation 8 with a covenant on the north property that the applicant will provide at the time they develop it, vehicle and pedestrian circulation and that it be architecturally compatible with the adjacent Arco site. Larry Springer asked that this be written up for the next ERC meeting. Jim Hanson, suggested a letter to Arco to explain ERC's concern on significant access and compatibility problems with the property to the North and ask them for a plan that would be compatible with their present layout. Don Erickson stated that this had already been done. Dick Houghton withdrew his motion. He suggested the committee hold this project until a better concept of the project is worked out. VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER ECF-082-87 Application for approval of a conditional use permit to allow the construction of a four level parking garage. Property located at 400 South 43rd Street. Don suggested setting up an Advisory Committee to review the Master Plan. The new plan is premature and the design only showed a portion of phase 1 of the 2 phase garage which is approximately 25% of the total development. Don Erickson expressed concern with the positon of the spandrels. The design shows them at an angle. Straight across would be more aesthetically pleasing. Also, the cyclone fence infill panels are not shown. Noise and air quality in the garage are an added concern. Dick Houghton, felt left hand turn pockets should be installed on Talbot Road. DECISION: Hold for one week until Committee members have had a chance to review the packet of information. 3. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 11:45 a.m. 9 tl ( (4) ) BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE STAFF REPORT November 18, 1987 A. BACKGROUND: APPLICANT: Service Corporation of Washington PROJECT: Greenwood Cemetery Gravel Pit ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF-066-87 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for special permit for fill and grade permit to allow the extension of an existing permit (SP-048-85) which will allow completion of fill operations and restoration of the site. The work is to include 142,000 cubic yards of removal and 295,000 cubic yards of fill. • LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Property located at 350 Monroe Avenue N.E. B. ISSUES: Whether sufficient information has been provided on the source of the fill material; Whether sufficient information and measures have been provided to ensure protection of the aquifer recharge area and minimize siltation; Whether sufficient information has been provided with respect to measures that will be taken to protect the aquifer; Whether sufficient information has been provided on measures to minimize impacts on the surrounding area. C. ANALYSIS: The amount of excavation and fill will equate to approximately 24,000 truck loads of material or approximately 50 truck trips per day. Although not significant by itself, the accumulative effects of this and similar operations in the area on vehicular traffic is a concern. D: RECOMMENDATIONS: Recommend that the Environmental Review Committee issue Determination of Non- Significance - Mitigated with the following conditions: 1. That the applicant work with the City of Renton Police Department and the Public Works Department to determine acceptable haul routes. BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW MMITTEE STAFF REPORT SERVICE CORPORATION OF WASHINGTON GREENWOOD CEMETERY GRAVEL PIT NOVEMBER 18, 1987 PAGE 2 2 . That the applicant 'contact the Seattle/King County Health Department to ensure that the fill material to be placed on the site is properly inspected and tested to ensure that it is acceptable and poses little or no risk to the City's drinking water supply. 3. That the fill material contain only minor amounts of organic substances and shall have rock or\ similar irreducible material with al maximum dimension no greater than eight (8) inches in diameter pursuant to City ordinance. 4. That the fill material not contain soluble poisons or other leachable compounds (including all petroleum based substances such as asphalt) which may have the potential for contaminating the City's drinking water. 5. That the applicant contract with the Seattle/King County Health Department • to monitor the site and to provide monthly reports on the types of fill material being deposited on the site and the results of leachate monitoring tests. 6. That the applicant provide two monitoring wells (one uphill and one downhill) going down to the hardpan. 7. That the applicant replace the vegetation in the 30 foot setback along the eastern and southern boundaries of the site with similar species of equal size. 8. That the applicant post a $5, 000 cash bond for street cleaning. 9. That the hours of operation be from 8: 00 a.m. to 3 :00 p.m. Monday through Friday. 10. That the applicant provide vehicle cleanup facilities on-site in addition to the existing concrete apron. 11. That a minimum six (6) foot high view obscuring fence be installed around the fill site. D. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS: Various City departments have reviewed and commented upon the project. These comments are as follows: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW "^MMITTEE STAFF REPORT SERVICE CORPORATION OF WASHINGTON GREENWOOD CEMETERY GRAVEL PIT NOVEMBER 18, 1987 PAGE 3 Police Department: . Following conditions were recommended: 1. Applicant hire an off duty Renton Police officer to monitor the job site at all times it is in operation to ensure compliance with the Hearing Examiner's decision and City Codes. 2. A screening fence at least four feet high be placed all the way around the site. 3. A wheel washing station be installed and every truck that leaves the site has to be washed so it is clean of all dirt and mud. 4. A street washer with operator in the cab be present at all times to clean the street if needed. 5. Maintain the same hauling, hours as the previous permit. 6. No weekend work in the pit. 7. Posting of a $10,000 cash bond with th city to pay for any clean up that the contractor does not accomplish. 8. No tracking of dirt and/or mud onto the street at all. Fire Prevention Bureau: No comments. Design Engineering: Design Engineering provided the following comment: Ground water monitoring wells should be installed once the City decides how, where, and who will coordinate and direct program. Traffic Engineering: Traffic Engineering provided the following comment: Bonding needed for street cleaning required. Utility Engineering: Utility Engineering provided the following comment: Must address fill in relationship to aquifer in aquifer protection area. Parks and Recreation: Building Division: No comments. Zoning Division: Policy Development: The Policy Development Department provided the following comments: 1. What is the source of the fill? DU11.0J11YV J81V iJ 6.' J.ivt7 LI:+.cCl.\il'LJ:+1`Ii ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW N1MITTEE STAFF REPORT SERVICE CORPORATION OF WASHINGTON GREENWOOD CEMETERY GRAVEL PIT NOVEMBER 18, 1987 PAGE 4 • 2. The same conditions placed on the previous special permit (SP-048-85) should also be required of this permit. • 3. This department does not support the requested extension of hours of operation. 4. Are the proposed sedimentation control measures adequate to insure protection of the aquifer? \ • • • BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE STAFF REPORT November 12, 1987 A. BACKGROUND: APPLICANT: Service Corporation of Washington PROJECT: Greenwood Cemetery Gravel Pit ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF-066-87 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for special permit for fill and grade permit to allow the extension of an existing permit (SP-048-85) which will allow completion of fill operations and restoration of the site. The work is to include 142,000 cubic yards 'of removal and 295, 000 cubic yards of fill. 1. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Property located at 350 Monroe Avenue N.E. B. ISSUES: Whether sufficient information has been provided on the source of the fill material; Whether sufficient information has been provided with respect to measures that will be takes to protect the aquifer; Whether sufficient information and measures have been provided to ensure protection of the aquifer recharge area and minimize siltation; Whether sufficient information has been provided on measures to minimize impacts on the surrounding area. C: RECOMMENDATIONS: Recommend that the Environmental Review Committee issue Determination of Non- Significance - Mitigated with the following conditions: 1. That the applicant work with the City of Renton Police Department and the Public Works Department. 2. That the applicant work with the Public Works Department to ensure that the fill material to be placed on the site is acceptable in this sensitive area. 3. That the fill material contain only minor amounts of organic substances and shall have rock or similar irreducible material with a maximum dimension no BUILDING ANDZONING DEPARTMENT „ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW IMITTEE STAFF REPORT ,; SERVICE CORPORATION OF WASHINGTON GREENWOOD CEMETERY GRAVEL PIT NOVEMBER 12, 1987 PAGE 2 greater than eight (8) inches in diameter. 4. That the fill material not contain soluble poisons or other leachable compounds (incuding all petroleum based substances such as asphalt) which have the potential for contaminating the ground water. 5. That the applicant contract with a licensed professional geotechnical engineer approved by the City to monitor the site and to provide monthly reports on the types of fill material being deposited don the site and the results of leachate monitoring together with a monitoring well going down to the hardpan. 6. That the applicant the applicant replace the vegetation in the 30 foot setback along the eastern and southern boundaries of the site with similar species of equal size. 7. That the applicant post a $5,000 cash bond for street cleaning. 8. That the hours of operation be from 7:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. Monday through Friday. 9. That the applicant provide vehicle cleanup facilities on-site in addition to the existing concrete apron. D. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS: Various City departments have reviewed and commented upon the project. These comments are as follows: Police Department: Following conditions were recommended: 1. Applicant hire an off duty Renton 1/ Police officer to monitor the job site at all times it is in operation to ensure compliance with the Hearing Examiner's decision and City Codes. 2. A screening fence at least four feet high be placed all the way around the site. 3. A wheel washing station be installed and every truck that leaves the site has to be washed so it is clean of all dirt and mud. 4. A street washer with operator in the cab be present at all times to clean the street if needed. 5. Maintain the same hauling hours as the previous permit. 6. No weekend work in the pit. BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT "ENVIRONMENTAL! REVIEW IMITTEE STAFF REPORT SERVICE CORPORATION OF WASHINGTON GREENWOOD CEMETERY GRAVEL PIT NOVEMBER 12, 1987 PAGE 3 7. Posting of a $10,000 cash bond with th city to pay for any clean up that the contractor does not accomplish. 8. No tracking of dirt and/or mud onto the street at all. Fire Prevention Bureau: No comments. Design Engineering: Design Engineering provided the following comment: Ground water monitoring wells should be installed once the City decides how, where, and who will coordinate and direct program. Traffic Engineering: Traffic Engineering provided the following comment: Bonding needed for street cleaning required. Utility Engineering: Utility Engineering provided the following comment: Must address fill in relationship to aquifer in aquifer protection area. Parks and Recreation: Building Division: No comments. Zoning Division: Policy Development: The Policy Development Department provided the following comments: 1. What is the Source of the fill? 2. The same conditions placed on the previous special permit (SP-048-85) should also be required of this permit. 3. This department does not support the requested extension of hours of operation. 4. Are the proposed sedimentation - control measures adequate to insure protection of the aquifer? 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET' REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: VOkr9 . DATE CIRCULATED: October 16, 1Y987 COMMENTS DUE: October 28, 1987' EFC - 066 - 87' ' APPLICATION NO(S).: Special Permit: SP-076-87 PROPONENT: Service Corporation'of Washington PROJECT TITLE: Greenwood Cemetery Gravel Pit BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT.:Application for special permit :for fill and grade permit . to allow the extention of'an existing permit (SP=048-85) which will allow completion of fill operations and restoration of the sate. The work •i.s to include 142.000 cubic Eydir U i .removal and 295,000 cubic yards of fill. Located at 350 Monroe Avenue N.E. , SITE AREA: BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS . PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE . MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY . 1) Earth • • ✓ ' 2) Air 3) Water • 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources . . 7) Environmental Health . 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing , , 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare • 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation b 15) Public Services 1 16) Utilities COMMENTS: • - , • k • We have revywed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expert* in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additio al 'niformation ' needed to properly assess this proposal. 7S' at re of, Director or Authorized Representative Date i Form 4 RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT • DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET _ • ECF - 066 - 87 . APPLICATION NO(S) : SPECIAL PERMIT: SP-076-87 PROPONENT: SERVICE CORPORATION OF WASHINGTON .. PROJECT TITLE : GREENWOOD CEMETERY GRAVEL PIT APPLICATION FOR. SPECIAL PERMIT FOR FILL'AND GRADE PERMIT BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: TO ALLOW THE EXTENTION OF AN EXISTING PERMIT (SP-048-85) WHICH WILL ALLOW COMPLETION OF: FILL ONtRAI1UNS AND RtSIURAIIUN Ur iris 51it.THE WORK IS TO INCLUDE 142,000=CUBIC YARDS OF REMOVAL AND 295,000. CUBIC YARDS OF FILL. LOCATION : LOCATED AT 350 MONROE AVENUE N.E. TO : PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT • SCHEDULED ERC DATE: 11-/11/87 FJENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION • SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU OPARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT 121 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M. ON October 28, 1987 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : EIAPPROVED EAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ®.NOT APPROVED DATE: /0 -367 --<27 k SIGNRE OF DIRECTOR `OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 • RENTS'"' BUILDING & ZONING DEPAP"PMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ..::. ECF - 066 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S) ; SPECIAL PERMIT: SP-076-87 PROPONENT : SERVICE CORPORATION OF WASHINGTON . PROJECT TITLE; GREENWOOD CEMETERY GRAVEL PIT . • • APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT FOR• FILL'AND GRADE PERMIT BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: TO ALLOW THE EXTENTION OF AN EXISTING PERMIT (SP-048-85) WHICH WILL ALLOW COMPLETION OF. FILL. UNLRAIIDN5 AND [(LSI URA IIUN Ur i iL.THE WORK IS TO INCLUDE 142,000=CUBIC YARDS OF REMOVAL AND 295,000. CUBIC_YARDS OF FILL. : . LOCATION : LOCATED AT 350 MONROE AVENUE N.E. . . TO: El PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT . . SCHEDULED ERC DATE: 11 /11/87 EIENGINEERING DIVISION OTRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION • SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : OUTILITIES ENG . DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU DPARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT ElBUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT OPOLICE DEPARTMENT OPOLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OOTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :00 P .M. ON October 28, 1987 . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 2OI'OIR) . El APPROVED 14APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS IINOT APPROVED n IAA R)6 {'Vl 05'1 l c R, Moi,U 11titelo C.1JJN\), GlL6ai,ty-( F f56AY useC) i HA VJiuu i\ko-I \- R1111 FU U 7-46 (. r ly l.c‘10 - 2tm 6p,_ L \yU cI pIruco P10,1n04) •-1-6 S1/8 (.CoNftrtcu$., 1-kit -.) \40ULAD G") p...-ic53-foR, 11), • l I'OFO, iO J:* ,6\ lz-U+M ILI-f Nl I OJy i orv40 11+8 306 IS jZ ulRk--510 OR-DIN ► u 66 • -V-, bona, DATE: )d J Z)'", SIGNATURE OF DIeCTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEE1 FtICE I REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 1.1 E-I tf(�S '�' ®� 16'1Q7 DATE CIRCULATED: October 16, '1987 COMMENTS DUE: October 28, 1987 EFC - 066 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S). : Special Permit: SP-076-87 PROPONENT: Service Corporation of Washington PROJECT TITLE: Greenwood Cemetery Gravel Pit BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:Application for special permit ilor `fill and grade permit to allow the extention of an existing permit LSP-048-85i which will allow completion of fill £operations and restoration of the site. The work is to include 142,000 cubic L�r INN:removal and 295,000 cubic yards of fill. Located at 350 Monroe Avenue N.E. SITE AREA: BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing I 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities ✓ COMMENTS: lu AwAFett- l�wiwfaw ,ems — wttisf OI3& $ FsLL INILE4.4noevuo t A6WtMreti ( , { We have review-d t', is application with particular attention to those areas we have expertis: in =nd hav- identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional iwarm %ion i , - =%=dto properly assess this proposal. Signature ofAirector or Authorized Representative Date `•.' :" Form 4 RENT() WILDING & ZONING.DEPAI—RENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 066 - 87 • APPLICATION NO(S) ; SPECIAL PERMIT: SP-076-87'• ' . PROPONENT: SERVICE CORPORATION OF WASHINGTON • PROJECT TITLE : GREENWOOD CEMETERY GRAVEL 'PIT . • ... " APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT FOR-'FILL'AND GRADE PERMIT BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: TO ALLOW THE EXTENTION OF AN EXISTING PERMIT (SP-048-85) WHICH WILL ALLOW COMPLETION. OF. FILL OPERA I !DNS AND RESIURAI1UN Uf- II-t SiIt.THE WORK IS TO INCLUDE 142,000-CUBIC YARDS OF REMOVAL AND 295,000. CUBIC YARDS OF FILL. LOCATION : LOCATED AT 350 MONROE AVENUE N.E. . TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 11./11/87 El ENGINEERING DIVISION flTRAFFIC ENG, DIVISION • SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION El FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU El PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT . E] BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : ' COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P .M. ON October 28, 1987 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Or/4/Ty o�IVGIN�E�/�lfn APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS Nr' NOT APPROVED jlmLmi APPROVAL SUBJECT s s9///z ztzate „Az() LATE COMERS AGREEMENT-i - ? ) 5 458_ ASG29. 604{ S-2C, (J os t �a�Get& ' G TE LIIiERS AGREEMENT-���.:W3 • � ? SYSTEM�YMAPMENT CHARGE-WATER .-. '/ems `O. 5€2:447' IAIf`luGalGC• C"4p0uillr4it.. 1!tl ':44110 SYSTEM IEVELiIPMENT CHARGE-SEWER yssD.A/s4. T SPECIAL ASSIRSIMNT AREA CHARGE-WATER A!p ` p SPECIAL ALIT AREA CHARGE-SEWER ivp 1 APPROVED WATER MAW 140 APPROVED SEWER MAN ND APPROVED FI$ ITORMIT LOCATIONS _ BY FIRE DEPT. . ODi _ ii FIRE FLOW ANALYSIS Np 6�.g / DATE: /a _ 23 - 87 SIGNATURE OF DI • ECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 , Form 182 CIT.: ('r.UNYON CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEE t 1 73 ��% ( i ' 1 2149N ENVIRONMENTALru REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ©tI� Otie.trn . MT 231gP2 DATE CIRCULATED: October 16, 1987 COMMENTS D itcYc hrtN tzp (Ia EFC - 066 - 87 CITY OF RENTON APPLICATION NO(S).: Special Permit: SP-076-87 D 0 nT 1 6 1987 PROPONENT: Service Corporation of Washington (� C E o V E PROJECT TITLE: Greenwood Cemetery Gravel Pit 15 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT.:Application for special permit ;for fill and grade permit . to allow the extention of an existing permit (SP-048-85) which will allow completion yyof fill operations and restoration of the site. The work is to include 142.000 cubic L afi : removal and 295,000 cubic yards of fill. Located at 350 Monroe Avenue N.E. SITE AREA: BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth V I 2) Air 3) Water • ✓ 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare • 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities CONVENTS: • 1 . u t.at fAU La tueGe fu“, z, fAt.t i-dexou. crkotoaka-pv7 re-eivuri pednevlsit (6P- oi-406. av ) .A.L1-70 iae,rrnt,t7- 3. tA4. d 1/ Art.oeifirre -134.4 , 4 . awe rrz? 6 +'t4 vytiatitiutres) &oLeiuut*.x. kAit.A.-/uv& to.ferbt,c,c,tunt altii-ifur • We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. // :AL AAI AL A . _ k.fri L_ _I A (. 'th1z4" 23 D 1')S3- Signature _of Director or Authorized Representative Date Form 4 RENT( ' BUILDING & ZONING DEPA "rMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 066 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S) ; SPECIAL PERMIT: SP-076-87 PROPONENT : SERVICE CORPORATION OF WASHINGTON • PROJECT TITLE : GREENWOOD CEMETERY GRAVEL PIT • APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT FOR FILL'AND GRADE PERMIT BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: TO ALLOW THE EXTENTION OF AN EXISTING PERMIT (SP-048-85) WHICH WILL ALLOW COMPLETION OF FILL UI'tUAI1UNS AND KLSIUKAI1UN Uf IHL 51IL.THE WORK IS TO INCLUDE 142,000=CUBIC YARDS OF REMOVAL AND 295,000 CUBIC YARDS OF FILL. LOCATION : LOCATED AT 350 MONROE AVENUE N.E. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 11./11/87 1::1 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION • SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : _____ El UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT El POLICE DEPARTMENT JPOLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON October 28, 1987 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; a— APPROVED El APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ® NOT APPROVED u ,fir AT vunutta n DATEC ! . - Z 8 7- SIGN URE OF DIRECTO OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 CQrf `,7 B��N G.PsAMV P . 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEE. = . l Fq;• REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Trn-pc, �i T21987 DATE CIRCULATED: October 16, 1987 COMMENTS DUE: October'28. 1987 EFC - 066 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S).: Special Permit: SP-076-87 PROPONENT: Service Corporation of Washington PROJECT TITLE: Greenwood Cemetery Gravel Pit BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:Application for special perMt 2€or "fill and grade permit4-. to allow the extention of an existmnq permit (SP-048-85) which will allow completion of fill operations and restoration of the site. The work-is to include 142.000 cubic - yardTs 18N�f£:removal and 295,000 cubic yards of fill. LUi,A Located at 350 Monroe Avenue N.E. SITE AREA: BUILDING AREA (gross): • IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE • MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 1--- 3) Water 4) • Plants 5) Animals v' • 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 1 S) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics ° 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation G, 14) Transportation ---- 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: 0 • J� !d i -e ec1,2. A Cka ,, {{{���j� 4344 e tree • 6'k { • We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. r OP) to ,..2:Vp • „, Signature of Director or uthorized Representative Date .. Form 4 RENT( BUILDING & ZONING,DEPA--MENT ; DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 066 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S) : SPECIAL" PERMIT: SP-076-87 PROPONENT: SERVICE CORPORATION OF WASHINGTON PROJECT TITLE : GREENWOOD CEMETERY GRAVEL PIT` APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT FOR :FILL'AND' GRADE PERMIT BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: TO ALLOW THE EXTENTION OF AN EXISTING PERMIT (SP-048-85) WHICH WILL ALLOW COMPLETION OF FILL UI RAI1UNS AND Kt51UKAIIUN OF IHt J11t.THE WORK IS TO INCLUDE 142,000=CUBIC YARDS OF REMOVAL AND 295,000- CUBIC YARDS OF FILL. : . . a LOCATION : LOCATED AT 350 MONROE AVENUE N.E. TO: - El PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 11`/I1/87 El ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG, DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : ______ UTILITIES ENG, DIVISION El FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT El BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 1::1 POLICE DEPARTMENT El POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON October 28, 1987 , • REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; ova i°4; E�/4-reer/ F APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS • D NOT APPROVED I3otnd, LL,) 4 v` 5±r of C l e lit DATE: SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE f ; REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 i' 3 fit'° r7. tl ri a 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST-REVIEW SHEET OCT 21 � `'' :.; REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: (�oJw,e---c Xury . DATE CIRCULATED: October 16, 1987 COMMENTS DUE: October 28. 1987 EFC - 066 - 87 . APPLICATION NO(S).: Special Permit: SP-076-87 PROPONENT: Service Corporation of Washington PROJECT TITLE: Greenwood Cemetery Gravel Pit BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT.:Application for special permit or fill and grade permit _ to allow the extention of an existing permit (SP-048-85) which will allow co!pletion of fill operations and restoration of the site. The work is to include 142.000 cubic yU�r f ig removal and 295,000 cubic yards of fill. Located at 350 Monroe Avenue N.E. SITE AREA: BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth I✓ 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 1. 5) Animals /✓ 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health I✓1, 8) Land and Shoreline Use 1/ 9) Housing !✓ 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 1✓ 12) Recreation 1✓ 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation ✓ 14) Transportation ✓ 15) Public Services ✓ , 16) Utilities ✓ COMMENTS: b • /tom c.el�+---�- L 4, We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. ✓a✓l% ' l Signature of Director or AuthO ized Representative Date Form 4 RENTC" BUILDING & ZONING.DEPAr"INENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET: ECF - 066 _ 87 APPLICATION NO(S) : SPECIAL PERMIT: SP-076-87 PROPONENT: SERVICE CORPORATION OF WASHINGTON PROJECT TITLE; GREENWOOD CEMETERY GRAVEL PIT • APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT FOR:FILL'AND':GRADE PERMIT BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: TO ALLOW THE EXTENTION OF AN EXISTING PERMIT '(SP-048-85) WHICH WILL ALLOW COMPLETION OF FILL UP.KAI!UNS AND KESIUKAIIUN UI- . IHt 511t.THE WORK IS TO INCLUDE 142,000'CUBIC YARDS OF REMOVAL AND 295,000. CUBIC.YARDS OF FILL. LOCATION : LOCATED AT 350 MONROE AVENUE N.E. TO: ID PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT • . . SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 11./II/'87 ENGINEERING DIVISION . Ei TRAFFIC ENG, DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG, DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT 0 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 0 POLICE DEPARTMENT El POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT El OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT . BY 5 : 00 P.M. ON October 28, .1987 , N REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : . flAPPROVED ® APPROVED WITH C DITIONS ONOT APPROVED et f c-J ,r/7 .�_ . . / 2/1/ / 3 • DATE; • . , SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED R EPRESENTATIVE. ..': REVISION 5/1982 ` Form.182 - Cbi';_.3;1 RENTC ) 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEei ' % U L - �? REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Fre , 4 ' R • ry DATE CIRCULATED: October 16, 1987 COMMENTS DUE: October 28, 1987' 11, GUILD I,. • . EFC - 066 - 87' APPLICATION NO(S).: Special Permit: SP-076-87 PROPONENT: Service Corporation of Washington SIC _ e PROJECT TITLE: Greenwood Cemetery Gravel Pit tong igss7 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:Application for special permit for 'fill and grade permit . to allow the extention of an existing' permit (SP-048-85) whlch_wil.l allow completion of fill operations and restoration of the site. The work is to include 142.000 cubic EUi.AT arks ISN: removal and 295,000 cubic yards of fill. Located at 350 Monroe Avenue N.E. SITE AREA: BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air • 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: • • • We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we . have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative ' Date ' Form 4 RENT, " BUILDING & ZONING DEPA 'MENT <„ DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 066 - 87 ! • APPLICATION NOBS): SPECIAL PERMIT: SP-076-87 PROPONENT: SERVICE CORPORATION OF WASHINGTON PROJECT TITLE: GREENWOOD CEMETERY GRAVEL PIT ' APPLICATION FOR. SPECIAL PERMIT FOR. FILL*AND GRADE PERMIT BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: TO ALLOW THE EXTENTION OF AN EXISTING PERMIT (SP-048-85) WHICH WILL ALLOW COMPLETIQN OF FILL UNLRAIIUNS AND IthSIUKA11UN Uf II-IL Silt—THE WORK IS TO INCLUDE 142,000•CUBIC YARDS OFREMOVAL AND 295,QOO. CUBIC_YARDS OF FILL. • LOCATION : LOCATED AT 350 MONROE AVENUE N.E. • TO: • PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 1�87 ENGINEERING DIVISION • TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION • D_FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT Ej BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT • El POLICE DEPARTMENT El POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT , c OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M. ON October 28, 1987 0 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : • EIAPPROVED El APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS El NOT APPROVED h I , /9/7 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED: REPRESENTATIVE : REVISION S/1982 Form 182' L f;' 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET " REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: t'cAc�, DATE CIRCULATED: October 16, 1987 COMMENTS DUE: October 28, 1987 EFC - 066 - 87 h APPLICATION NO(S).: Special Permit: SP-076-87 PROPONENT: Service Corporation of Washington PROJECT TITLE: Greenwood Cemetery Gravel Pit BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:Application for special permit for fill and grade permit _ to allow the ettention of an existing permit (SP-048-85) which will allow completion of fillfoperations' and restoration of the site. The work is to include 142.0g0 cubic oU.L ISN:removal and 295,000 cubic yards of fill. Located at 350•Monroe Avenue N.E. SITE AREA: BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth. 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare • 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities . COMMENTS: 4.2_ • We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional informat' is n to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date •" . Form 4 ad e RENT BUILDING & ZONING DEP, 'MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET . • ECF - 066 - 87 . APPLICATION NO(S) : SPECIAL PERMIT: - SP-076-87 PROPONENT : SERVICE CORPORATION OF WASHINGTON • • PROJECT TITLE : GREENWOOD CEMETERY GRAVEL PIT • • APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL. PERMIT FOR FILL*AND GRADE PERMIT BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: TO ALLOW THE EXTENTION OF AN EXISTING PERMIT (SP-048-85) WHICH WILL ALLOW COMPLETION OF FILL ()PERAIIUNS AND RESI URA IIUN Ur iHt SIIE.THE WORK IS TO INCLUDE 142,000=CUBIC YARDS OF REMOVAL AND 295,000. CUBIC YARDS OF FILL. . LOCATION : LOCATED AT 350 MONROE AVENUE N.E. . TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT . . . SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 11./11/87 El ENGINEERING DIVISION • TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION ' SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON October 28, 1987 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ,. NOT APPROVED • ti DATE: SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 OF R�� THE CITY OF RENTON ,$ ® Z. MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 o BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • POLICE DEPARTMENT 0'9 (0• ALAN L.WALLIS, CHIEF 0,9gT�0 SEP1v! MEMORANDUM October 30, 1987 RE: SPECIAL PERMIT: SP-076-87 At this time the Police Department has to recommend that this permit application be denied. The work that has gone on at this site in the past has created a great amount of work for the police department and danger for the general public. The applicant has agreed to keep the streets clean of all debris whenever asked at a meeting; however, in reality ha's never complied unless an officer is present and threatens to arrest the operator. In fact criminal citations have been issued in an effort to force compliance with the hearing examiner's decision and City Code. I would recommend that no further material be allowed from the site and any fill permit be issued with the following conditions - 1) Applicant hire an off duty Renton Police officer to monitor the job site at all times it is in operation to. ensure compliance with the hearing examiners decision and City Codes. 2) A screening fence at least four feet high be placed all the way around the site. 3) A wheel washing station be installed and every truck that leaves the site has to be washed so it is clean of all dirt and mud. 4) A street washer with operator in the cab be present at all times to clean the street if needed. 5) Maintain the same hauling hours as the previous permit. 6) No weekend work in the pit. 7) Posting of a $10,000 cash bond with the City to pay for any clean up that the contractor does not accomplish. 8) No tracking of dirt and/or mud onto the street at all. D. . PERSSON, Captain * OF R4� r; ��, 0 THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON.WASH.98055 c, '®'LL, BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • POLICE DEPARTMENT 0.0 CO' ALAN L.WALLIS,CHIEF. 0,9gre0 SE A MEMORANDUM October 30, 1987 1 RE: SPECIAL PERMIT: SP-076-87 At this time the Police Department has to recommend that this permit application be denied. The work that has gone on at this site in the past has created a ,, great amount of work for the police department and danger for the general public. The applicant has agreed to keep the streets clean of all debris whenever- asked at a meeting; however, in reality ha's never complied unless an officer is present and threatens to arrest the operator. In fact criminal citations have been issued in an effort to force compliance with the hearing examiner's decision and City Code. I would recommend that no further material be allowed from the site and any fill permit be issued with the following conditions - . 1) , Applicant hire an off duty Renton Police officer to monitor the job site at all times it is in operation to ensure compliance with the hearing examiners decision and City Codes. 2) A screening fence at least four feet high be placed all the way around the site. " 3) A wheel washing station be installed and every truck that leaves the site has to be washed so it is clean of all dirt and mud. 4) A street washer with operator in the cab be present at all times to clean the street if needed. 5) Maintain the same hauling hours as the previous permit. 6) No weekend work in the pit. 7) Posting of a $10,000 cash bond with the City to pay for any clean up that the contractor does not accomplish. 8) No tracking of dirt and/or mud onto the street at all. D. . PERSSON, Captain 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHED 1 ' d U L REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: i, n•» t s ` , DATE CIRCULATED: October 16, 1987 COMMENTS DUE: October 28, 1987 EFC - 066 - 87 ;i',li�i, . ., .,,._ F. APPLICATION NO(S).: Special Permit: SP-076-87 PROPONENT: Service Corporation of Washington PROJECT TITLE: Greenwood Cemetery Gravel Pit BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT.:Application for special permit 2or fill and grade permit to allow the extention of an existing permit (SP-048-85) which_will allow completion of fill operations and restoration of the site. The work is to include 142.000 cubic Lra Ig: removal and 295,000 cubic yards of fill. Located at 350 Monroe Avenue N.E. SITE AREA: BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use • 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation >( 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: Or " - ._ il 0c� r We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. ' 2/-/".'...2,A. : Jo/mac/DP? Signr of Director of Authorized Representative Date Form 4 N RENT,- BUILDING & ZONING DEPA ANENT = w DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET �. ECF - 066 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S) ; '. SPECIAL" PERMIT: SP-076-87 PROPONENT: SERVICE CORPORATION OF WASHINGTON • PROJECT TITLE : GREENWOOD CEMETERY-GRAVEL PST • ; APPLICATION FOR. SPECIAL' PERMIT FOR 'FILL'AND GRADE PERMIT BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: TO ALLOW THE EXTENTION OF AN EXISTING PERMIT '(SP-048-85) WHICH WILL ALLOW COMPLETION OF FILL UNLKAIIUNS AND KtSIUKAIIUN UI- IHt SIIL.THE WORK IS TO INCLUDE 142,000 CUBIC YARDS OF REMOVAL AND 295,000. CUBIC YARDS OF FILL. : . LOCATION : LOCATED AT 350 MONROE AVENUE N.E. . TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT , . SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 11./11287 ENGINEERING DIVISION . TRAFFIC ENG, DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE:' UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION El FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU . PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT Ei BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT , El POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT - OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING, PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON October 28, 1987 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : /9 '��1 L APPROVED El APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS JJ NOT APPROVED • • DATE, 1: `1./ t62SIGNATU?!adV2M F DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED . REPRESENTATIVE REVISION ,5/1982 Form 182 JOHN R. EWING & . IATES ILIETTE0CDF UnQR1SrainruQl. 1314 S. Central, Suite KENT, WASHINGTON 98032 (206) 852'6633 DATE 10/IZ/B" JOB NO. tit ATTENTION wast.si L1 Nt RE: • TO GbT`( O N.TON 6ER.VIC.E CO2.1=012.A-rioN Ca-MEN Wool) CEMI: 1E341( CITY OF RENTON RECEIVED OCT tX1987 BUILiiNLG /ZONING DEPT. WE ARE SENDING YOU g Attached 0 Under separate cover via the following items: ❑ Shop drawings $. Prints 0 Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Copy of letter 0 Change order ❑ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 4:0 iolh l8.-1 'lz. FIL_L. ,G,2/X0E A. 2EsT oca a1no1.4. r'E—tz./ W/tz S t4oTE AI p4s IJC,,, Ta tiorrEct.tA L_ QulAt✓► r' Ar•30 SIZC . ►o/I..(81 12EQ1560 ,1I— NIArfa.RA.-r1j. RET-LEcT114Ct MIA'r'Q,I tllrl.r QU A L..►'I'1( `j me I ic>(l av/67 Iflj 45L4Pti - K- f t.4G'r'6o r4 op- 5141-, 1/ THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted 0 Resubmit copies for approval For your use 0 Approved as noted 0 Submit copies for distribution As requested 0 Returned for corrections 0 Return corrected prints ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS COPY TO SIGNED: PRODUCT 240.1 (n( 5)Inc,Groton,Mass 01471. If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. 1- • Y ` BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director September 25, 1987 Granville Horn John R. Ewing and Associates 1314 S. Central, Suite 200 Kent, WA 98032 ! - Subject: Service Corporation of Washington Special Permit for Fill and Grade at Greenwood Memorial Park Cemetery, File: SP-076-87, ECF-066-87 .,r Dear Mr.Horn: The staff of the Renton Building and Zoning Department have done a preliminary review of the above referenced special permit application, and before we route the application for other City departments to comment on, we will need the following information from you first: 1. The project narrative under section No. 1 states that concrete and/or asphalt will be filled in layers of no more than two foot lifts and that the upper eight feet of the fill will not contain concrete or asphalt pieces larger than two cubic feet. This information is also written directly onto the blueprints submitted. This will not be acceptable as the City's Mining, Excavation and Grading Ordinance states that "Earth materials shall have no more than minor amounts of organic substances and shall have no rock or similar irreducible material with a maximum dimension greater than eight (8") . inches". Please revise the application to reflect compliance-with City Code. ,\ upon submittal of revised information, we will continue with our review process. Do K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE:JFL:csb:dskl LtHorn 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 ��Y, o ('- TY OF RENTO�''T? . FILE NO(S): 'SP- 7(p-81 • A�iR-DDING & ZONING DEPARTM_ T L -066-81 ♦ ru • , MASTER APPLICATION • . NOTE TO APPLICANT: Since this is a comprehensive application form, only those items related to your specific type of application(s).are to be;completed. . . (Please print or type. Attach additional sheets if necessary:) APPLICANT I I TYPE OF 'APPLICATION NAME • FEES Service Corporation of Washington ` ADDRESS 0 REZONE*(F TO ) ED 350 Monroe Ave. NE SPECIAL PERMIT* CITY ZIP TRY PERMIT* Renton, WA 98056 0 CONDITImAL WE PERMIT* C TELEPHONE �3 SIT ' `N APPROVAL SPECIAL PERMIT FOR GRADE AND FILL 255-1511 No. of Cubic -Yards: 249, 000 CONTACT PERSON 0. 0 • VARIANCE* L . From Section: * Justification Required NAME Johri R. Ewing & Associates E. ATTN: Granville Horn ADDRESS " SUBDIVISIONS: 1314 S Central, Suite 200 0 SHORT PLAT CITY • ZIP 0 TENTATIVE PLAT Kent,. WA 98032 0 PRELIMINARY PLAT ' ' TELEPHONE 0 FINAL PLAT 852-6633 [] WAIVER (Justification Required) r---OWNER NO. OF LOTS: NAME PLAT NAME: 7:i Service Corporation International ADDRESS' : PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: ' P.O. Box X-1010 0 PRELIMINARY CITY ZIP 0 FINAL San Diego, CA 9. 2112 TELEPHONE P.U.D. NAME: (619) 5 78-0410 0 Residential 0 Industrial 0 Commercial 0 Mixed LOCATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: PROPERTY ADDRESS ' 0 TENTATIVE 350 Monroe Ave. NE CD PRELIMINARY EXISTING USE PRESENT ZONING FINAL cemetery . G-1 PROPOSED USE PARK NAME: cemetery NUMBER OF SPACES:- 0 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE SQ. FT. ACRES AREA: TOTAL FEES 5M.(24%Arm 74ox. approx. 13 Ac. I I 11 11I ~[ TA� USE ONLY -- ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING DA `TAP APPLICATION RECEIVED BY: AUG 1 3 19B7 APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: 0 Accepted BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. 0 Incomplete Notification Sent On By: . (Initials) DATE ROUTED ADDITIONAL MATERIAL RECEIVED BY: i — APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: 6 - aie 0 Accepted 1 Incomplete Notification Sent On By: (Initials) .ROUTED TO: \Building 0 Design Eng. Fire pa Parks • d 0 Police Va Policy Dev. ! 6.d Traffic Eng. /E! j Utilities , REVISED 1-31-84 • Legal description of property (if more space is required, attach a separate sheet). The NW 1./4 of the NE 1/4 of Section 16, T 23 N, R 5 E, in King County, Washington. Less roads. • i - tom_ 1 r' + - AFFIDAVIT . • I, Granville N. Horn • , being• duly sworn, declare that I am authorized representative to act for the property owner,Elowner of the-property,'involved - in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. - - SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS - (6' DAY OF if---)/ 192: • NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF • WASHINGTON RESIDING , AT - - .• Vs4 AtIVAAr.4- • )"'z\e)- ---v • Public) (Signature of Owner) cr• !"�ji r'�, '' �Sty L' R .,° /(D� 6/13(XSI (Address)' (Addiess) ; •t - (City) (State) (Zip) (Telephone) Acceptance of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete application. Plans and other materials required to constitute a complete application are listed in the "Application Procedure." • r • Foxm #174 C8TY OF RENTON AECEIEDPROJECT NARRATIVE OCT 1) j9 ? BUILDING /ZONING DEPT. This application is for the extension of an existing special permit 048-85, issued to Greenwood Memorial Park, allowing completion of fill operations , and restoration of the site. 1 ) Site work includes two phases that will be worked simultaneously. Phase I will require restoration work only - approximately 142 ,000 cubic yards of import to bring the pit back up to surrounding grade. Phase II , still in possession of approximately 107 ,000 cubic yards of sand and gravel material to be removed, would require around 153 , 000 cubic yards of material to restore it to the existing perimeter grade. The material used to fill both phases will be clean, suitable fill consisting of no organic or man-made materials except for small concrete and/or asphalt, and will be filled in layers of no more than two ( 2) foot lifts . The upper eight feet of the fill not to contain concrete and/or asphalt pieces with a maximum dimension greater than eight (8) inches . 2) Hours of operation under the current permit are from 9 :00 a.m. to 3 : 00 p.m. , Monday through Friday. These hours were set to eliminate potential conflicts during peak hour traffic and noise problems with the residential community to the east . In light of the current stage of both pits, a revision to operating times is requested. As the filling of Phase I requires fewer pieces of equipment, is substantially lower than the surrounding ground and is further from the residential development to the east than Phase II , an extension of the hours of operation is desired. Based on the Hearing Examiner 's report of August 7 , 1985 , additional hours of 7 :00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. , Monday through Friday are requested for Phase I only. Phase II would operate 9 : 00 a.m. to 3 :00 p.m. as it has done previously. 3) Completion of the filling of both Phase I and II to be within 24 months from the receipt of the special permit . 4 ) Vehicle traffic will be limited to the NE 3rd-NE 4th corridor unless deliveries are being made to a residential area. Then the travel on residential streets will be limited to the maximum extent possible. 5) To reduce the possibility of tracking debris offsite by those vehicles hauling material , a rocked construction entrance is to be constructed. This, in addition to the existing 100-foot + concrete apron, should permit loose debris to fall from the vehicles . A temporary hose bib adjacent to the rocked entrance will permit additional debris removal from the trucks through spraying. Noise due to operations in the pits will be during daylight/ evening hours . The pit elevations and sloped sides would tend to cause any sound from the operations to be directed upward. Not until the elevations are closer to the existing surrounding ground should noise be much of a concern. 6) As both pits have cut into the City of Renton aquifer , concerns over ground water recharging and siltation have been expressed by the City. In order to prevent the silting up of the aquifer, temporary and permanent measures will be taken during the operation. On a temporary basis - as the fill is brought in and graded, providing surface drainage in one direction, straw bales will be placed along the toe of the fill . This should provide filtration of any sediment-laden water prior to its reaching the exposed aquifer slope. The bales are to be raised as the level of the fill rises . Both Phase I and II will have a storm drainage/infiltration system to recharge the aquifer. Phase I will have a closed system where surface water, after being passed through an oil/water separator , will enter a twelve-inch perforated pipe whose trench will contact the exposed aquifer . Phase II will provide a pipe/basin system whose trenches will also contact the aquifer , but eventually tie into a system to the south. All basins in both phases will have an oil/water separator. -1 F, OWNER: Service Corporation International ADDRESS: P.O. Box X-1010, San Diego, CA 92112 KING COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER: 16235-9079 16235-9080 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: The NW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section 16, T 23 N, T 5 E, W.M. , in King County, Washington. Less roads. ICITYOF %)\1 nan*./ AUG 1 3 BUILDING/ZONING DFPT2 il FORM #140 s.-.6 A E. t"=hoc_' V\G.\ om \-'Y M ls.P 1 IIII kli — - Zwz 2Et-1Tot, Ii (1 t�PTS, vOC-3 710I., TELHI..) • t � I l rvST1 7 0 444Evv..4,•....1 2 ► IV_A-At WJDs 1-k OME , EIZ•A.E Au-co ANV NO�,.(�r• QUILI BLDL .J 1 OIGE I V0c7 ,�// STO g \\ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \\\\ �GT s Ht�vl used \ \ Gp ( IA U 1 / loT \ Y i iAtt\ \ Ew000 ��\ \* t J L�PT #*4 : \ fi 1/�' \ PKO�ELT \4 2 Gvu2T OPEC \ LO I �. 1 1 N \ 2 APT Fi E�� i 0 _\ �" \ \- \ i \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ T>z! ..I L D(Z PAc2 1c RFC Yc 6.-(--)k I R.T. c.0 V K..SZ Y �,:?F--tc P5 AUG'‘-A N W, VI 13'I9 1 BUILDING/ZONING DEP-re_ GT,z 1,,_23_5 , — — 1 RITTENHOU�G-LEMAN&ASSOCIATES, INC. = "pi Geotechnical Consultants 1400 140th Avenue N.E: Bellevue, Washington 98005 = '' (206)746-8020 " 27._March 1987, W-5176 .,_ - ' CITY Op _ ;= _ ' Service Corporation International L :� I I! ; 9830 Willow Creek Road = - P,o. Box .x 1010. AUG'13 = _-' - _;=.. San Diego, California . 93112 BUILDING/ZONI :7�=� NG DE c Attention: Mr. David Hunt, Vice President Subject: Field Exploration Geotechnical Engineering Assessment Borrow Pit Backfill Operations _- Greenwood Memorial Park Cemetery - • Renton, Washington Gentlemen: -. We are writing this letter to provide the results of our limited field exploration program, laboratory testing, and geotechnical engineering evaluation for the above referenced.project. Our work was accomplished in accordance with our 16 March 1987 letter. We understand removal of gravel from the Phase I excavation has been ' essentially completed by Gary Merlino Construction Company. A portion of the area . I has been subsequently backfilled by the contractor and has been represented as an example of the finished product. In addition, backfilling of the main borrow pit :R area has begun. At your request, we have completed a limited field exploration program in the backfilled area adjacent to the mausoleums in order to assess the . nature and distribution of the existing backfilled soils, with regards to the use of this area for cemetery purposes. Our field exploration also included recovery and testing of representative portions of the materials comprising the slopes of Z the Phase I area. We understand your concerns regarding the borrow pit operation revolve principally around three areas: 1) the nature of the upper 10 feet of existing backfilled Service Corporation International W-5176 27 March 1987 Page 2 • soils; 2) drainage provisions for the Phase I area in order to allow recharge of the site aquifer; 3) performance specifications or guidance regarding the contractor's backfill operations for the mass backfill comprising the pit backfill below 10 feet. The following sections of this letter discuss these topics in greater detail . Rehabilitated Area We have completed a limited test pit exploration in the area to the west of the mausoleums which has been recently backfilled by Gary Merlino Construction Company. Mr. Merlino has represented this area as an example of what he considers to be a suitably back.filled area. We offer the following discussion based on our observations and testing in the three backhoe test pits. The fill soils appear to be quite variable in composition, primarily composed of silty, gravelly, sand _ I soils. The test pits disclosed local occurrences of highly organic soils together with wood waste, concrete debris, and some asphalt chunks. In addition, cobble or boulder-sized materials were present occasionally in the fill at the test. pit locations. We performed a number of in-place density tests together with associated laboratory maximum density curves in order to assess the compaction level of the fill soils, Actual conditions encountered in our test pit logs are summarized both on the test pit logs with a description of the conditions, and test results and summarized on an attached table which indicates moisture content and grain size characteristics of the soils tested. The compacted density recorded in our test pits were also quite variable, ranging from as low as 79 percent of the laboratory maximum (ASTM:D 1557 modified Proctor) to as high as 95 percent. It should be noted, however, that some areas were too soft to be tested as the soils comprising the side slopes of the test pits were "running" into the pit. In addition to a variable density state, a significant variation in moisture content of the site soils was disclosed. However, in general , these soils were tested and found to be either at or significantly above the optimum moisture content. The optimum moisture content is at a moisture content which allows the greatest degree of compaction for a given compactive energy level . Service Corporation International W-5176 27 March 1987 Page 3 The contract language is rather specific regarding the nature of the material to comprise the upper 10 feet. The backfill in this area is to consist of a clean, stable material suitable for burial , internment and cemetery purposes. Specifically excluded from the backfill are concrete, asphalt or construction debris, or rocks larger than one-man size. In the geotechnical engineer vernacular, "clean", would indicate a certain grain size characteristic and would exclude materials with a significant portion of soil fines (that soil fraction passing the U.S. No. 200 sieve) . The variable density observed in the backfill may contribute to the high moisture content observed in some samples, as the permeability or infiltration characteristics of the backfill soils are highly dependent on the soil density in addition to the soil texture characteristics. The stability of the trench side walls in the test pits also indicates the high variability in density and texture ' characteristics of the backfill soils. In one instance, the backhoe operator was unable to advance the excavation beyond a 4-foot depth due to an observed flowing ground condition in loose saturated deposits comprising the backfill soils. Depending on the anticipated future use in this area,, these soils in their present condition would likely serve unfavorably. The existing fill soils which are primarily silty and loose in nature would provide a poor subgrade for future pavement support purposes. The poor sidewall stability of the backhoe trenches also indicates considerable difficulty could be anticipated for excavation and installation of underground vaults or other conventional burial purposes. In addition, the low and variable nature of the existing fill would make support of any settlement-sensitive structure, such as masonry or stone mausoleums, difficult 1 or impossible without extensive mitigative efforts. Although our exploration is not sufficient so as to provide a refined settlement estimate, we suspect that long-term site settlement may be on the order of 2 to 3 feet, much of which will be in the form of differential settlement. The settlement performance of the soils will depend to a great deal on the thickness of both random fill and the nature of the upper 10 feet of fill . Fine-grained soils could be utilized for the upper 10 feet if adequately ecompacted to an Service Corporation International W-5176 27 March 1987 Page 4 • approximate density. We would recommend a minimum compactive level of 90 percent if the maximum dry density ASTM:D 1557. If fine-grained soils are to be used, it may be desireable to cap the "random". or mass fill with a more permeable layer, such as sand or sand and gravel , adequately sloped above the subsurface to promote drainage to the sides of the pit. Conversely, clean fill could be used exclusively in the upper 10 feet, if placed and compacted as described subsequently. For planning purposes, heavily loaded structures or intensive developments should not be located over the center of the pit, but rather towards the perimeter of the pit where underlain by the controlled fill placed per the above guidelines . If the locations of the settlement-sensitive facilities can be determined in advance, special compactive efforts may be completed as the fill is placed if greater thicknesses of random fill are to be present. Drainage ' The proposed drainage system currently approved by the City of Renton would be installed only after the depth. of fill within the Phase I area reaches approximately 20 feet below final grade. Therefore, in the interim, a significant amount of fill soils must be placed in order to reach this elevation, and no methods are proposed to control ground water or surface water in the intervening period. In our opinion, in consideration of the likely nature of the soils used to backfill this Phase I excavation, control of surface and/or ground water will be imperative with respect to successful use of the Phase I excavation area in the future. We . _ have sampled and tested several samples from the si dewal l s of the Phase I excavation. These materials are basically gravel-sized materials with gravel contents in excess of about 50 percent as shown on the attached grain size distribution curves which follow this letter. In general, these materials exhibit very low fines content and would be highly permeable with respect to ground water recharge applications. However, the current pit backfill process has covered the lower portion of these soils across the bulk of the bottom of the pit. Reportedly, hardpan or other glacially consolidated and relatively impermeable materials are present at the pit bottom. Therefore, any recharge of the aquifer must take place from the sides at existing pit 'wall slopes. Service Corporation International W-5176 27 March 1987 Page 5 As presently planned and approved, the ground water recharge infiltration wells would be constructed only after the existing fill reaches final grade. No provisions are indicated which would allow infiltration of storm or surface waters prior to reaching the ultimate grade. In our opinion, some form of interim storm or surface water management would be necessary in order to allow reasonable compaction of the random backfill soils, especially during wet weather or wet site conditions. A conceptual system could consist of an infiltration gallery installed at the extreme northern end of the Phase I excavation. This temporary system could be provided with an extendable inlet structure whereby access for the storm water could be provided as the grade of the random fill increases. From a planning standpoint, we would recommend the coefficient of permeability for the site soils comprising the side slopes be assigned a value of 20 to 50x10-2cm per second. This value is a prescriptive value based on correlations between grain size and permeability. Other considerations regarding the ultimate drainage system would include measures to protect the quality of the water infiltrating into the aquifer. The nature of the imported soils should be closely monitored to prevent inclusion of contaminated soils. As a minimum, adequate steps or provisions should be incorporated in order to avoid the introduction of significant volumes of ground water with suspended fines or solids. With time, the fines could "blind" or block the aquifer, leading to impaired performance of the recharge system. In addition, as a minimum, some means of separating oil and other petroleum fluids from the water to be recharged into the underlying aquifer should be provided. This may be accomplished on a temporary basis with silt fences and/or hay bales surrounding the inlet structure. 'On a permanent basis , we would recommend the final design incorporate adequate oil/water separators and baffles in order to allow sedimentation prior to introduction of the storm water into the recharge system. Some periodic maintenance of these facilities would be necessary to sustain adequate long-term operation of the recharge system. Service Corporation International W-5176 27 March 1987 Page 6 General Filling and Performance Recommendations We understand something on the order in excess of 200,000 yards of material has been removed in the Phase I excavation. Some 48,000 to 50,000 yards of material• has been removed from Tract I . The material specifications for the random fill to be placed in the bulk of the excavation below the upper 10 feet are quite vague . Garbage, appliances or car bodies have been excluded. Therefore, it is likely that a significant variation in material type will be , and should be , anticipated for the random fill volume. The present method of fill placement in the pit bottom appears to be random. A significant number of mounds of fill , exposed to the weather, are present across the bottom of the pit. Mounding the fill allows formation of ponds and increases the moisture content of the fill at the time of compaction or spreading. In addition, pit operation has locally oversteepened the slopes supporting the cemetery road on the east side of the pit. Several utilities, irrigation lines and water lines appeared to be exposed to the weather, and could be subject to failure which could precipitate major soil losses should uncontrolled water flow occur. In general , since no compaction specifications were included in the contract, we would recommend a performance-type specification which would allow for rational drainage of the existing or proposed backfill soils while controlling surface water in the disposal area. The key elements of the backfill procedure would be- as follows: 1) elimination of fill mounding; 2) ground contour control ;. 3) storm and ' surface water control ; 4) selected disposal of coarser waste products. The elimination of fill mounding and piles will require grading and blading of the material as it is dumped. However, prompt blading and spreading of these soils will reduce the likelihood of fill saturation and would likewise reduce the thickness of each fill lift. We recommend the fill placement procedures be such that a constant slope is maintained downward to the north where the temporary storm water control sytem would be installed, Sloping of the fill in this area will reduce the water ponding except in the area localized at the north end of the pit. These steps would also reduce the likelihood of fill saturation. Selected disposal of coarser portions of the fill such as concrete, asphalt, or boulders could be Service Corporation International W-5176 27 March 1987 Page 7 • accomplished in the areas where standing water is presently noted. In this manner, placement of the large non-moisture-sensitive portions of the debris would allow the fill surface to rise above the static water level in the base of the Phase I area, thereby allowing future placement and spreading of finer-grained portions of debris material in the future in this area. These steps will serve, to control storm water and drainage and likewise improve the ultimate performance of the material . Ideally, each dump load should be spread as it is dumped. We recognize this would be accomplished at a greater cost to the contractor. Therefore, as much as practical , we would recommend daily spreading of the imported fill materials in order to maintain the contour and promote positive drainage to the intermediate storm water control facilities. We recommend that the debris be placed in horizontal lifts a maximum thickness of 2 feet, and the grading efforts be deferred when it is not possible to run tracked equipment over the newly placed fill . Each lift should be track- or wheel-rolled to reduce the volume of voids. Even with these steps, future settlement in terms of 1 to 3 feet may occur. The future uses should be reviewed in light of these anticipated movements. We trust this letter is sufficient for your needs. If you have any questions regarding this letter or other topics, please feel free to call at your earliest conveneince. Respectfully submitted, RITTENHOUSE-ZEMAN. ASS CIATES, INC. David C. Williams Engineering Geologist rt W. Groesch, P.E. a :y 0 f�° ; fir Associate r� ;cv o Enclosures po0,r,-.RIGIs1E?:;•,?s %tkS 10 N AV ,, TEST PIT " m TP-1 L a m m a E — `c m m c 0 Soil Description 0-- Interbedded loose and medium dense, wet, brown and gray, silty, S1 9 gravelly, SAND with clasts of silt and scattered cobbles below 2 z feet. (Fill ) _BS1 S 13 92% density at 22 feet. 5—S2 8 Loose, wet, gray, silty, gravelly, SAND with some clay, wood debris, BS1 9 concrete waste. (Fill ) S3 S 8 95% density at 6 feet (Test conducted in soil/concrete mixture) . Loose, wet, brown, silty, gravelly, SAND with some asphalt debris. 10_S4S 14 (Fill ) Total depth 10 feet. 19 March 1987 Slight seepage of perched water at 22 to 3 feet. 15— m ae TEST PIT TP-2 o E c m a) f0 0 p cn 3 0 Soil Description 0 BS1S, 10 Loose, wet, brown, silty, gravelly, SAND with cobbles to 18 inch diameter. (Fill ) - S1 S 10 89% density at surface. Very loose, saturated, brown, siity, gravelly, SAND. Trim 5— _ Total depth 4 feet. 19 March 1987 Very rapid influx of saturated soil below 3 feet prevented further excavation. Continual sloughing and caving from the surface. 10--- W-5176 15— Greenwood Cemetery •RITTENHOUSE-ZEMAN& ��� ASSOCIATES. INC. Geotechnical Consultants 1400 140th.V.E. !' Bellevue. Washington 9h007 (206):46-8020 / mug i m . a m m TEST PIT TP-3 . E — c m O p Crr) C.j Soil Description S1 10 Loose, wet, dark brown, gravelly, silty SAND with abundant wood waste, roots, concrete debris, and fine organic material . (Fill ) 79% density at 3 feet. 7.8% organic content at 3 feet. 4S1S15 5 Medium dense, moist, brown, fine to coarse SAND and GRAVEL with ,2 S 7 trace silt. (Native) Total depth 8 feet. 19 March 1987 10 15 W-5176 Greenwood Cemetery •RITTENHOUSE-ZEMAN& R�� ASSOCIATES, INC. Geotechniaal Consultants 1400 140111 N.E. Be!lerue. ii aahinglon 9h007 �_ TABLE I W-5176 Greenwood Cemetery Summary of Laboratory Testing Water Content Fines Content Organic Test Pit Sample Depth (%) (% Bulk Sample) Content(%) TP-1 S-1 1' 9.4 21.1 TP-1 S-2 5' 7.8 37.7 TP-1 S-3 7' 7.5 31.9 TP-1 S-4 9F' 3.7 27.1 TP-1 BS-1 2i' 12.7 23.0 TP-1 BS-2 5i' 8.7 19.0 TP-2 S-1 2' 15.6 17.9 TP-2 BS-1 Surface 9.7 20.4 TP-3 S-1 Surface 10.4 9.4 TP-3 S-2 7F' 6.6 3.4 (Native) - TP-3 BS-1 3' 14.7 10.8 7.8 GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION SIZE OF OPENING IN INCHES U.S. STANDARD SIEVE SIZE HYDROMETER 6' 3' 1 Y4 3/4, 3/8. 4 10 too ---,-- �. 2040 6,0100 200 ( 7 I I1'1 �-sr- I - ...... _;.- —7 ,-.—.-••- ;....,_T.,...— 100 i, .. i1 I I i I i t i� � �,� �-�I' I... .:�.I-' t ( i._._..__�I , l I I � i ��� I � I _ i, 80 _.,.._ t i i i I 1111111 1 ' 1; 1 ! i iill : 70 ._._._i..._._..._._,_...— ! __ .I t I I i I i I k _ ' ii .I :; , :1f11 I i : , 1I : I ill 1 ,I ; 1.. W 60 hill ! !i i l.._. __.---.I.- hill ! 'I I ilLii I i ! I ( t I � 1- 1111 ' 11� 11.1 1 ilf I I ' 11: } = I ; ---{ I I i ii: Hi 1 1 1 t lip I { (! i I \•.I l:il j � 11 ! I ` � I I . I I ,, !14 I ; I , : I I I ! I � I�� ICI• ) 1 1 Fri, ,) 1.-4—...'• � S.. !'. 40 tu �' ! i ! ' t 11 ' 1'! 1 ' 1 i li I 1 I 11if...ii ! 1 1 1 ii I i ! I11 ( t,ili I: • ( I i .I 1 I.. 20 { � _ , tlrli -._L ..--�ri,.� r liil.isi ,'„! -!� '....I..I 1 ...;_.,. I 1! : .�.. 1 1 1 1 . i 1 h.... iI i { } I f '... i....�. _...__.=20 11 11 !Nil 1•1I ' t 1 : :i I 1 ; 110 . . ..� _ ,. i i I!i ` � i f �i1I 1 i J �..tI I' 1 i ...�-�.3 �.,;',�, ..._�`t.�.�..,rt..I..� Y-- -�i....-�....?..._;_......;..._.....�10 1 ' 11 I ; i " ! ; I i dill , ; ' 111 , i i o "Jil ' 11._._� jllii.� ; I,1i , i ,tii ? ' . i .......__l 1....1..11 ! 1 (11' l3 1000 100 10 1.0 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS COBBLES Coarse Fine Coarse Medium Fine Silt Clay GRAVEL SAND FINE GRAINED Boring Sample Depth % Moisture % Passing 200 i Pit Wall S-1 3' 3. 9 less than 1 Pit Wall S-2 15' 6.9 7.9 • W-5176 • RITTENHOUSE-ZEMAN& �� ASSOCIATES, INC. Geotechnical Consultants ,....1.44,1":11::: 1400 140th N.E. Bellevue, Washington 98007 111., (206)746-8020 GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION SIZE OF OPENING IN INCHES U.S. STANDARD SIEVE SIZE HYDROMETER 6' 3' 11/2' 3/,4' 3/8' 4 10 20 40 60100 200 • 100 3 ,i r ..li .r i..'._ i.`T _..... �.. , ___... Ti f T.�—_. T—r...--i 100 illi 4 11 ' it I 1 2. is ''1 1 ! : ' i 1 1 1 t i 1 , Hi 1 •?..f•_w ..—r.......,......i.1 1 ; E _�1.90 ff i }�s f 1 �(i > 11I ' f�1� I� i 1 = 111i i : 1 t 11 11 1 ', 11" 1 1 1 I: 1 1#EE 111 t i 1 < . :i ' : 1 1 1 i • S, j 3 H t11 ! tt 70 it i i i i , . 1 1 1 I , 1 3;I t _I 11 1 i i t t 1 1 ` i : {1 t4.i...t. i t i ! � i 1 III i 1 I � 1 60 .. . -s-_.. I 4.4 t • i i i ! } :!! 111 i3 111I. 1 i 1 i• 1 _.1..� 1 ~fi 1 m 1 j 1 i j} i j f) i t 1 , ' t t rt 50 ri..4_1....3.....t._,(...._—............—.....r.t7 .-.........T. 7...._ v.r......1..i. , ............ __....h..1.1.4....i __.,.. .......t.. i .i.rt..4.....,....1 ..f...,. 1 I f j 6 40 {?.1'—L:....._.,......._:.-._........._:.,.«. .......--. F.�_s ' ' ... 3 i ' ' ! ,.L,.1 j ; ,;1 4 1 1 I . { f 40 f ` a i 1 1 : 11 1 I lIj1 ' 1 1 i !1 1 1 i i t I 1 30 Ew.((Hz•—.—._t— ...._._..1.,.r:—t —}tt.—II I i—i..y'` at{E ;jE ! i ; ? t I 0 1 i } i i i'j ! 1 i'1 ' n', _ 1 i 1 •_..:---f._... ,,,,,,'___�((1{( 1 ...�__._. i 1 �,..✓--•-_;......I+.__..1 I� 1 1 ! i 1 I... i 1i1 € ~P 1 I 11. ! I F! •H i 1 3 • 1 l'i i ,I i i If • 20 1 t 1 i i .'f I j III { ! j I WW1 !: i i--ce__. __f.___......1111, 1 ' ` g t .. �.3 { I � a `� � E , '..}._,....f.. 1 + -�-t• E � i20 10 ?° '` 1i; ' # 111. I1 i 1 ! ( 11 t € i i i t+ ,>. itf. I i 1 t.. i ` i E ! E ' .1 f i 1 { 1 f i (1 S 1 i ii .. •, j f i t s ' { i ti p I 0 ', ..:.�... _ :: ._. : _ ?.i .__ ,, ..._ ._.. _1 i __.W'......... Ili!_._i -. I _.I !1!i, ' ....�_..i _ i 1000 100 10 1.0 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS COBBLES Coarse Fine Coarse Medium 1 Fine Silt Clay GRAVEL SAND FINE GRAINED Boring Sample Depth % Moisture % Passing 200 Pit Wall S-3 20' 4.0 less than 1 Pit Wall S-4 8' 3.2 1.2 W-5176 RITTENHOUSE-ZEMAN& IIZA ASSOCIATES, INC Geotechnical ConsultantsirtatitilemiNie: 1400 140th N.E. Bellevue, Washington 98007 1_ (206)746-8020 • OF R� g AECF: -Dlo(-87 f C) 9 4 z u -1,� City of��Re�nton Lu:; . SP-C/(e- Z O 0,9grED SEPSE�ee ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW. requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for allproposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: 1 1)L1 J .1 ; 1.. ' - This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic` information about your proposal: 1 Gdverrimental =agencies Use 'this checklists' to' i determine- 'whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known. or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully. to the best of your knowledge.,,, In most cases, you should_ be, able.. to:.answer .the iquestions, from your.gown observations or project`plans without the need to hire experts. :If,you really do.-not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to yo6r proposai, write`"do not know" or "does not apply." 'Complete answers-to the questions now may avoid unnecessary;delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such'as zoning.•shoreline', and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal. even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impacts. Use of Checklist for Nonproject Proposals: (Please Type or Print Legibly) Complete this.checklist for2nonprgjects proposals,.;even though questions may be answered "does snot apply."- IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT-ACTIONS'(part D). For nonproject actionsr(actionsinvolving decisions:on`policies, plans and programs), the references in-the checklist to'-'the words "project;" "applicant," and'"property or site" -should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area." respectively. ' ' A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Greenwood Cemetery Gravel Pit 2. Name of applicant: Service Corporation International - 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact-person: P.O. Box X-1010 Bob Anderson John R. Ewing & Associates San Diego, CA 92112 350 Monroe Ave. NE 1314. S Central, Ste. 200 (619) 578-0410 Renton, WA 98056 Kent, WA 98032 (206) 255-1511 (206) 852-6633 4. Date checklist prepared: July 29, 1987 5. Agency requesting checklist: .r - City of Renton Building & Zoning Department 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): 1. Correction of the portion of Phase Owest pit) near mausoleum to be done on or before March i1.1988. 2. Prior to September 1987, sections of Phase I (west pit) adjacent to interior roads of the (C`emetery will be built up to stabilize those roads. 3. Completion of the filling of both east & west pits to grades, sho.wn;-on yet to be approved plans for site regeneration, shall be completed within 24 months from the time of commencement. CITY OF E;"i�i0'�•! -D AUG 131987 RI III nini.r./7n1\11nir' 7. Do you have any ph, for future additions, expansions, -urther activity related to or connected with this proposal? if yes, explain. Once the site has been restored, it will be used as additional burial area for the cemetery. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Environmental Checklist - June 1985. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. Unknown. 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. -Special permit for filling & grading -SEPA documentation -Annual f�'.11ing & grading license to be issued by City of Renton Building & D Zoning epartment. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. This project will involve 'corrections of.prior work, removal of material (Phase II) and complete restoration'to grade to portions of the Greenwood Cemetery, known as Phase I (west pit) and Phase II (east pit). These areas • total approx. 13 acres of the cemetery. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would'occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topography map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The site is located generally in the vicinity of 350 Monroe Ave. NE, the address of the Greenwood Memorial Cemetery. The two locations are along NE 2nd St. ,. Phase I located at the NE corner of Monroe Ave. NE & NE 2nd St. , while•Phase II is located in the SE corner of the cemetery site along NE 2nd. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH Cc-4r a. General description of-:the.. site (circle one); flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other C b. i What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent-slope)? • - "c : 'What general types of soils ;are foundcon the site (for exa'mple;'`caljr, sand, --gravel,'peat, muck)? If you know'-the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime,farmlandj _ , : Sand and gravel. r. ''r.- c d. Are,there surface indications_or history of unstable soils in the immediate = T v ci`riitiyr If so, describe: ^ -' r r. i: = r o i _ - • ci 1 NOi i. • - -r j ' is — c., _ •"i nJ : _• 7 !iii 1 : - • . " r' ' - C - ',. r'iz'C= '7 i - ' - .? . G: r'i-)1 C f r:1: - r :. ` • 5 4 e. Describe tht: =irpose, type, and approximate qu ,ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. See attached. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Erosion could occur in both areas, however, drainage is currently into project and would not affect adjacent properties. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 0% . Areas will be planted with lawn and landscaped. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: During filling operations, grading will be to the center of each pit area. Upon completion, siltation fencing will be used at low spots until grass seeding has become established. 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood. smoke) during construction and - °::when,- the- project is Jcompleted? :If -,any, generally -describe and give approximate quantities if known. __ is I - : iVehiele`erriissiOns-'Would,beA-prersent in higher_ quantities• during the construction phase"of the project than after, completion:of the project. Dust from the fill material.during construction would also be present. b. Are there any off-site sources of emission? Vehicle emissions from Monroe Ave. NE and NE 2nd St. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Properly tuned vehicles and periodic sprinkling of the area to keep the dust to a.—rriinimum could be employed to reduce air emissions. 3. WATER a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. :� . _ i - .i :.: i 1, L - 'i i. _. 1 ' r� - .` _ : i 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. n/a :1 is . 1 - '_i .. - G'; 1 i 1 - • __ . - . - . :1' i 3)- ' ' Estimate the1amount of fill-and•dredge material that would tie placed in or removed from surface'water or wetlands-`and Indicate'the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. n/a • - 3 - 4) Will the prc al require surface water withdra; .s or diversions? Give • -, general description, purpose, and approximately quantities if known. No. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on • _ thesite plan. - :_- 4 • : No. • 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters?,. If_, so,_ describe, the. type of waste j' 'and anticipated ,volume of discharge. No. • - '!i Ili i_ .-. 1- :;1 IiCl i ._C: .. C , iJ•' - ' - ' =..Ca • 1 it J b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and appaoximately quantities if known. A system of recharging the area ground water'will be implemented in both:Phase I and II once the site has been filled& regraded. The • i u ' exact iquantitie si are u'nknown,-,cbut only surface;water_;runoff from the area of Phase II will b-e:discharged to the'•griound;o .- J Ci,...7 : 'I _ c _:1 1 i _. 111 . : •Cic 2) Describe waste material that will be.=dischargedi into;,the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals . . .; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. i l'I.Ui 1 1 i 7 1 i i'U: i •a a. 'c' .ri-Ja C': ."U - ^ - • c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Storm water will be the primary source for surface runoff for both Phase I and Phase II. Positive grading to selected collection points will collect surface drainage for underground dispersion in a designed trench system. 2) Could-waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. \A. The collection system will provide both•oil/water separation and sedimentation settlement prior to being injected back into the ground. Damage to the system or improper installation might allow waste material to enter the ground. • - 4 - d. Proposed me les to reduce or control surface, :ind, and runoff water impacts. if. any:. - _ 1- 1 1 - i_ i_i ' . 1: ' ..Pos'iti re drainage-, -an'-approved, infiltration system_for- storm runoff and site landscaping will reduce the ,possibility of, surface, ground and runoff impacts. 4. Plants • a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: - : a ,,deciduous,tree: alder, maple,,aspen,•gther _ _ ;,„ o ' evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other • o Shrubs ar grass o crop or grain o Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup; bullrush, skunk cabbage, other o water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other o other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Sites currently have little vegetation. Prior excavation of material has removed all but perimeter vegetation. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. • Unknown. • • d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: The south and west sides of Phase I and the south and east sides of Phase II will have a landscaping buffer, either natural or by design. The inteior portions of both sites will be primarily lawn with occaisional,'; 5. Animals plantings. a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: • Birds: Hawk, heron, eagle, ongbirdi)other Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other rodents _ Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. •i 1 1 Unknown. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Possibly, but on a fly over basis only. The site in its present condition has no attraction for migrating fowl. - - 11 . 1 - 1 f 1 1 1 '1 C. - S - d. Proposed m .res to preserve or enhance wildlif ' any: Site restoration will provide limited cover for wildlife in the area. - • " ,andscapiiig;previously.:mentioned will soften the sitei's_.appearance and attract'so-m'eiwil'dlife. • ''i ' i [ i - _ 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric. natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. No source of energy will be required by the completed project. • b. -Would your project affect. the potential use of_solar energy by adjacent properties;? If so, generally describe. : r No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: v ; ! -n/a- • - 7.' i Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No. • • 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. • None required. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if -any:- i -,i - < . _ i . - b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Local traffic on abutting streets - Monroe Ave. NE and NE .2nd St. with possible equipment din from the King County Public Works shops would be the only source of offsite noise. - 6 - 2) What types a' -.ovals of noise would be created t _ -''r associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? - Indicate what- hours •noise .would .come - - i •io from:the site. . i . i _ is Equipment in the form of bulldozers &-dumpitrucks:-would add noise on a short term basis. UJpon completion of the project, visitor's vehicles would be the only source of noise. Per the Planning & Development Committee report of 10/28/85 operational noise would be present from 9:00 a. m. to 3:00 p.m. , Monday thru Friday. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: The site's semi-isolated location (except for the east property line) & its current elevation - well below existing ground - will keep a major portion of noise from denser populated areas. Not until the pit levels are closer to the existing ground will noise impacts on the adjacent properties be noticeable. . 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The site is part of the Greenwood Memorial Park, for future cemetery. West, across Monroe Ave. NE is an abandoned gravel pit. South, across NE 2nd St. are the King County Public Works Shop Facility and the Renton District Court. East adjacent to the site are the Mastro Apartments. • ^r b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No. c. . Describe any structures on the site. None. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Current zoning G-1, general use. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Public/quasi-public. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? h. Has any part of ,the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. Unknown. • i' i i ? it • i. Approximately how many people would reside or work. in the completed project? None. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: n/a • - 7 - 1. Proposed rri. ures to ensure the proposal is co. _ tible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Compliance with the current City of Renton Zoning Ordinance,, Title IV, Chapter 23 Mining, Excavation & Grading Ordinance and the previous decisions by the Hearing- Examiner on application SP,-048-.85. 9. Housing I 1 J • 1: :J a. Approximately how many units would =be provided,' 'VI-any? Indicate • whether-high, middle, or:low-income housing. •- i • 1 . i n/a b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate iwhether_high,.middle, or low-income,housing. i • - n/a - i [i - --- i= - " - c.' :Proposed Measures t6reduce or control housing impacts, if any: n/a • 10. Aesthetics a. What isrJ the tallest height of any _proposed structure(s), not; including antennas; what,is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed.- b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: None. 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? None. _ - - _ :_ _ - b. Could light or glare from 'the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? • No. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect, your.proposal? Street lighting on adjoining streets. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None. - 8 - • 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the • immediate vicinity? - None. 7. ,., , . _.i yam,. ii .. : _ ,i:' c :: i b. Would the proposed project displace:any existing recreational_ uses? If so, describe. " - r i c: i i i = i No. .0 . . i i .i c. Proposed measures to"reduce or 'control'impacts on recreation, including • recreation opportunities to be provided by the-project or applicant', if any: None. • 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation • a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to,the site. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None. • 14. Transportation ` i =_i i i=i - a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. To the north, NE 4th St. To the west, Monroe Ave. N. To the south NE 2nd St. Access to the construction portion of the site is on Monroe Ave. N. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximately •distance to the nearest transit stop? Unknown. The scope of this checklist would not require public transit for this project. , c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? • n/a d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). A private road system to provide grave-site access may be installed. - 9 - e. Will the pr, t use (or occur in the immediate anity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the-completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Based on previous recommendations by the Council, 60 truck trips/day. These to take place between 9 a. m. and 3 p. m. Monday - Friday. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: "Truck traffic will be limited to NE 3rd/NE 4't'h corridor for both import & export from the site. On export from the site diversion from.the above routes may be made if deliveries are being made to a residential area. " (Planning & Development Committee report - 10/28/85) 15. Public Services • r a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. n/a 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: j natural gas, 4 Ulephone anitary sewer eptic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. No new utilities are being proposed for the site during this project. C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to;the best.of,my knowledge the a_bove:information is true and complete. It- is understood that the lead' agency may withdraw-any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. rr Proponent: r; ow:41/Q4. Name Printed: G 2A�v 1L.L E N. 14D21A • _ 1 - • 1 r . _: 'C• - 1 0 - #176 11-8-84 B. 1 .e. The material used to fill the two pits will be of suitable clean fill consisting of no organic or man-made materials, except for small concrete and asphalt pieces, and will be filled in layers of no greater than two foot lifts. The upper eight feet of the fill not to contain concrete or asphalt pieces larger than two cubic feet, and then only on an isolated basis. This eight foot section to be used for additional burial locations. Approximately 142 ,000 cubic yards of material will be needed for the backfilling of Phase I . Phase II , still in possession of approximately 107,000 cubic yards of suitable material to be removed, would require a total of approximately 153,000 cubic yards of material to backfill . The 107,000 cubic yards is the additional material remaining in the pit to the approved final elevation of 323, and may not be removed completely. CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO. : ECF-066-8`7 4 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SP-076-87 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for special permit for fill and grade permit to allow the extension of an existing permit (SP- 048-85) which will allow completion of fill operations and restoration of the site. The work is to include 142 ,000 cubic yards of removal and 295,000 cubic yards of fill. PROPONENT: Service Corporation of Washington LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Property located at 350 Monroe Avenue N.E. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Building and Zoning Department The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030 (2) (c) . This decision was made after review of an expanded environmental checklist and preliminary site plan, on file with the lead agency. Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-2822 (D) Renton Municipal Code (see attached sheet) . These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340. The lead agency will not act on this proposal for fifteen (15) days from December 21, ,1987. Any interested party may submit written comments which must be submitted by 5: 00 p.m. January 4, 1988, in order to be considered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period will commence following the finalization of the DNS. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 235-2500 DATE OF DECISION: December 16, 1987 EFFECTIVE DATE: December 21, 1987 fit/.l►e..:�► Ronald G. Nelson L.�� ry r Spri,ger Building and Zoning Director icy -velo,'{ ent Director Ric ard Caoughton Public Works Director DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE MITIGATION MEASURES PROJECT: Greenwood Cemetery Gravel Pit ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF-066-87 APPLICATION NO. : SP-076-87 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for special permit for fill and grade permit to allow the extension of an existing permit (SP-048-85) which will allow completion of fill operations and restoration of the site. The work is to include 142,000 cubic yards of removal and 295, 000 cubic yards of fill. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Property located at 350 Monroe Avenue N.E. CONDITIONS:. 1. That the applicant work with the City of Renton Police Department and the Public Works Department to determine acceptable haul routes. 2. That the applicant contact the Seattle/King County Health Department to ensure that the fill material to be placed on the site is properly inspected and tested to ensure that it is acceptable and poses little or no risk to the City's drinking water supply. 3 . That the fill material contain only minor amounts of organic substances and shall have rock or similar irreducible material with a maximum dimension no greater than eight (8) inches in diameter pursuant to City ordinance. 4. That the fill material not contain soluble poisons or other leachable compounds (including all petroleum based substances including distillates and asphalt) which may have the potential for contaminating the City's drinking water. 5. That the applicant contract with an EPA approved testing lab to monitor the site and to provide monthly reports on the types of fill material being deposited on the site and the results of leachate monitoring tests. NOTE: Such tests shall be carried out at least four times a year and shall include analysis for heavy metals, petroleum distillates and other probable contaminants. The results of these tests will be transmitted to Ron Olsen, Utility Engineer, Renton Department of Public Works and Greg Bishop, Environmental Control Section, Seattle/King County Health Department. 6. That the applicant provide at least two monitoring wells on site (one uphill and one downhill) that go down to the hardpan. 7. That the applicant replace the vegetation in the 30 foot setback along the eastern and southern boundaries of the site with similar species of equal size. 8. That the applicant post a $5, 000 cash bond for street cleaning. 9. That the hours of operation be from 8:30 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. Monday through Friday. 10. That the applicant provide vehicle cleanup facilities including wheel wash down areas and sedimentation ponds on-site in addition to the existing concrete apron. 11. That a minimum six (6) foot high view obscuring fence be installed around the fill site. 12. That the applicant provide a performance bond or similar guarantee acceptable to the City Attorney for an amount of. $10,000 to cover street cleanup or damages to vehicles attributable to the proposed use.