HomeMy WebLinkAboutAppendix A -- 4th Dimension 10.28
Appendix A -- 4th Dimension 10 (Completed 11/11/25)
Transcript by Rev.com
Page 1 of 4
Appendix A
October 28, 2025, Hearing Transcript
4th Dimension Building
File No. – LUA25-000193
Note: This is a computer-generated transcript provided for informational purposes only. The
reader should not take this document as 100% accurate or take offense at errors created by the
limitations of the programming in transcribing speech. A recording of the hearing is available
from the City should anyone need an accurate rendition of the hearing testimony.
Examiner Olbrechts: (00:02):
Alright, good morning everybody. My name's Phil Albright. I'm a hearing examiner for the City of Renton
holding a hearing this morning on site plan review and a reasonable use variance for file number L lu A
25 dash 0 0 0 1 9 3. The fourth dimension, building a mixed use building in the city of Renton. The
hearing format today is we'll have a presentation from Jill Ding will give us an overview of the project.
Once she's done, we'll move on to applicant comments and applicant. You don't have to participate if
you don't want to. It's up to you. After that, we'll move on to public comments. So far it looks like we
don't have any members of the public, but we'll, if anyone comes in, we'll certainly give 'em a chance to
make their comments if they want. After that, we go back to Ms. Ding to answer any questions that
were raised or provide rebuttal evidence. Then the applicant gets a final opportunity of rebuttal under
due process and I get 10 business days to issue a decision. So not too complicated. Let's see. And who's
here on behalf of the applicant today? Sir, what's your name? You just have to unmute yourself there.
Speaker 3 (01:06):
Reer son, the architect.
Examiner Olbrechts: (01:07):
Oh, okay. Great. And Mr. Reer, have you had a chance to see Ms. STS staff report and the list of exhibits
she has in there? I have. Do you have any objection over entry of any of those documents?
Speaker 1 (01:18):
No, I do not.
Examiner Olbrechts: (01:19):
Okay. And Mr. Ros, I take it there's three additional ones right down there at the bottom? Yeah. Where's
your, these
Speaker 1 (01:28):
Are the additional,
Examiner Olbrechts: (01:29):
Appendix A -- 4th Dimension 10 (Completed 11/11/25)
Transcript by Rev.com
Page 2 of 4
There they are. Okay. So Mr. Rumor, we also have the staff PowerPoint, the City of Renton Maps and
the Google Earth. Any objection over those? Nope, those are admitted as well. That's exhibits one
through 24. And again, Mr. SROs, I am assuming there's no members of the public out there, is that
correct?
Speaker 1 (01:47):
I do not see any.
Examiner Olbrechts: (01:47):
Okay. Alright, so took care of the exhibits. Alright, Ms. Ding, let me swear you in. Just raise your right
hand. Do you swear affirm to tell the truth, nothing but the truth in this proceeding?
Ms. Ding: (01:56):
I do.
Examiner Olbrechts: (01:56):
Okay, great. Go ahead.
Speaker 1 (01:58):
Thank you. Okay, let me share my screen. Okay.
Ms. Ding: (02:17):
Are you seeing my PowerPoint?
Speaker 1 (02:20):
Yes.
Ms. Ding: (02:20):
Yes. Okay, excellent. Okay, so it's not a PowerPoint mode per se, it's more like the, it's got your
descriptions on the side. Oh, okay. It's the other screen.
Speaker 1 (02:38):
Let's try that. Yeah, that one. That work.
Ms. Ding: (02:43):
That work? Okay, good. It's always tricky. It is tricky. All right. Thank you. Good morning. My name is Jill
Ding. I'm a senior planner here with the city and I'm here to present the staff recommendation for the
fourth dimension building. It is file number A 25 dash 0 0 1 93. Just to start off with a brief description of
the proposal. You can see it on the vicinity map here that it is located at the intersection of Northeast
fourth Street and Bremerton Avenue Northeast. The applicant is requesting hearing examiner site plan
review and a reasonable use variance to construct a new five-story mixed use building. A similar project
was previously approved on this site under LUA 19 dash 0 0 1 53. However, that application expired. The
project site is located within the commercial arterial zone. It is located within Urban Design District D. It
is approximately 0.53 acres in area and there is a pipe stream mapped on site.
Appendix A -- 4th Dimension 10 (Completed 11/11/25)
Transcript by Rev.com
Page 3 of 4
(04:04):
The proposal would include the construction of a five story 70 foot tall mixed use building,
approximately 6,108 square feet of ground floor commercial retail, 26 dwelling units on levels two
through five, a second level roof deck, all parking located within a structured parking garage with 49
parking spaces. Construction of an open channel below the mixed use building access would be provided
off Bremerton Avenue Northeast and a five foot setback reduction along Bremerton Avenue Northeast
is requested. A 14 day public comment period began on August 20th and ended on September 3rd.
Comments were received from the Duwamish tribe and Washington State Department of Fish and
Wildlife on September 23rd. The Environmental Review Committee issued a determination of non-
significant mitigated with five mitigation measures.
(05:12):
The proposal was reviewed for compliance with the site plan and reasonable use variance criteria. It was
found that the proposal would be consistent with the relevant comprehensive plan land use policies. It
would be compliant with all relevant zoning regulations if all conditions of approval are complied with.
Would be compliant with all site plan review criteria if all conditions of approval are complied with. And
it would be compliant with the reasonable use variance criteria if all conditions of approval are complied
with. The proposal was routed to other departments for review. Police and fire prevention staff indicate
that sufficient exist to furnish services to the proposed development. Water services provided by the
city of Renton and water improvements will be required within and around the project site. Sewer
service is also provided by the city of Renton. Sewer improvements will be required within and around
the project site. We received a technical information report or drainage report prepared by harmson
LLC. The proposed project would provide underground detention facilities and a pod treatment system
to meet surface water flow control and water quality requirements. The project would be required to
comply with the city of Renton Surface Water design manual. And in conclusion, staff is recommending
approval of the fourth dimension building as depicted in Exhibit two, subject two 14, conditions of
approval.
Examiner Olbrechts: (06:57):
Okay, sounds good. Pretty straightforward for a project for you, Ms. Sting. I know you get all the tough
ones for the city of Renton. Some quick questions about the variance. I'm just not exactly sure what
standards are being modified in that. So are pipe streams, do they have buffers themselves or just, are
we talking about an encroachment for the resulting open stream or is it some regulation that prohibits
the relocation of a pipe stream? I wasn't quite sure what was going on there.
Ms. Ding: (07:29):
The city's critical. The city's variance criteria has specific criteria for construction over pipe streams.
Speaker 1 (07:38):
So
Ms. Ding: (07:38):
That was the criteria that was reviewed. There are no buffers from pipe streams. They are opening the
channel, but it's not really a restored channel. I guess it's going to be concrete. It's going to allow for
greater flows, but it's going to be covered by the building. It's not going to be open to the semi at.
Appendix A -- 4th Dimension 10 (Completed 11/11/25)
Transcript by Rev.com
Page 4 of 4
Examiner Olbrechts: (08:09):
Okay. So that open channel doesn't have any buffers then. And so there are specific code criteria about
building over a pipe stream and that's what's being waived then. Okay. Okay. Yeah, that's what I was
trying to figure out.
Speaker 1 (08:20):
Okay. What was evaluated? Correct.
Examiner Olbrechts: (08:22):
Sounds good. Alright, got it. Thank you. Alright then. Looks, sounds great. Let's move on to Mr. Reamer.
Any comments from the applicant here? I'll have to swear you in sir, if you want to say something.
Speaker 3 (08:35):
I don't have any other than I'm available for questions.
Examiner Olbrechts: (08:38):
Okay.
Speaker 3 (08:39):
Any comments that you might want from me. But we're happy with the project. We think it's going to be
great for the city and we had gone through this process once before and the city is great to work with,
so we're excited to get through it today.
Examiner Olbrechts: (08:53):
Okay, sounds good. Alright, well at this point I'm going to open it up for public comments. I don't know if
any members of the public have joined us since we started. It doesn't look like it. Mr. Cisneros, do you
see any members of the public there? If there's anyone out there that wants to say anything, click on
the raise hand button at the bottom of your screen. Not we do not have
Speaker 1 (09:11):
To members of the public.
Examiner Olbrechts: (09:13):
Okay. Alright. Yeah, pretty much anticipated that. So I guess I can just go ahead and close the hearing
then. As I said, this is a pretty straightforward project and MS thing usually gets the complicated ones,
but this one is not, it looks like except for the pipe issue. And that looks like that's pretty straightforward
as well, ultimately. So it shouldn't be too difficult to put together an approval and I'll get that approval
out within the next couple of weeks. So thanks all for participating today. We're adjourned. Have a great
rest of the day.
Speaker 1 (09:42):
Recording stopped.