The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA86-018 ' COMMENTS - *. *, 334040-0006-09 SHURGARD INCOME PORPERTIES 559999 999 THIRD AVE SUITE 1001 SEATTLE .WA 98104 302305-9002-01 PUGET SOUND POWER C LIGHT CO ' -PO BOX 863 BELLEVUE WA 98116 302305-9006-07 ' PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT 22.0467 PUGET POWER BLDG .„ BELLEVUE WA 98009 302305-9096-08 HAWK JOINT OWENRS 530982 6808 S 140TH SEATTLE WA • 98178 302305-9101-01 • OLYMPIC PIPE LINE CO PO BOX 236 RENTON WA 98055 A 302305-9103-09 • lo.r4H * BATCH NUMBER: ' CK : _ :;( CUSTOMER NAME .,_, AN MAR CO • . . ' Me•"..46.40........."4.J.41,-.1.40...6.4,44,..t.4.•4,1,.4,4...6-.0.,41,4,11.....4..4,4,4,4,...,4...I.44.0,,,,4_,A., !,7 125380-0010-03 BURLINGTON NORTHERN RR 453669. . 2100 FIRST INTERSTATE CTR '• 999 3RD AVE PROP, TAX DEPT ,.•::.:. SEATTLE WA 98104 192305-9016-00 PUGET SOUND POMER' CA,IGHT CO ,,,•,.!: PUGET POWER BUILDING ..- BELLEVUE WA 98004 . .,. S • 302305-9003-00 ' ROGGE. GLENN ' T R0579 * , . , . .,1; 9827 51ST AVE SW 13 —,T SEATTLE WA 98146 302305-9083-03 MOBIL OIL CORP OLYMPIC PIPE LINE CO - -.- 612 S FLOWER ST . .• LOS ANGELES CA 90017' . 302305-9098-06 . HAWK JOINT OWNERS 530984 :.•;,•- 608. S 140TH , SEATTLE WA 98178 • 302305-9103-09 i - GARY MERLIN° CONSTRUCTION CO - 8630 FAUNTLEE CREST SOUTHWEST . SEATTLE WA 98116 _. ., - ,� '� GARY MERLINO CONST. CO. SHORT PLAT & _ �, NW I/4,NE I/4, SEC.30,t 23 N., R.5 E., CITY OF RENTON,KING COUNTZ WA. I i, i •y NOr4S.4.9E 2L5 .54, _•,a P / i Q rr1 •I �J Per f l ' • _ ,.F s a t Np4,26 (�/,,,m Y .a. S S.R �GT 11 5y7•I ,S / h 0 7r,1- NOV yi-1- s'5-‘- 3 a 0 i -A nh LOT 1 $ h ��'''' ? h a LOT Z m N 0rP 0 �� 3N LOT3 a ch b� 2 z av 3'~' LOT 4 r. _.0 •L c..,rbu � [es.a7, ,,7"l.xo°w'co— zo'n.aa.c_ a i_.��- �l 3�.G/ • Z/4./9 • /73.Z7 S/5.3L ,/ .a4 1p • /Z/9.i8 U 'ff p6j/ 6 ' / *,005 .A.-=- _ -,� E. VALLEY HIGHWAY 12/9.ao R ;:. a/ +`35 : NO/'52'25 E 2G38.70 - - •_•. DECLARATION APPROVALS S AWN/ALL P6R90VA DY-Masi ARASE/VT-5,7U4T A 7WE UNLER31 VAL; EXAM•�VCO AND AFR40VLD 7N/t DAY OF /9e- LEGAL DWCRr 1 M\ 774CT FdRT/CN OF 1NC OWA4ERD N FEE.S/A4P E of 714E [ANDS //ERZIN CESCRI E0 -DO HBQF�Y �� /�/d[77701 rT OF 7r/6/un7uN0r$0.0/0aR MLKE A 3MC1TT.$[1C0 W5IM/ 77•{CREOF FtAt LI2NT 70 RC W 3&1-7--.--04�0J, W m, iLiNG.gO,�il�T/ 97D,Y,,/faNGC 5 Lb3T 4110 r 1 ARE 77//9 SHORT PLOT 7D 6E 774E 6RARX1/C RERRG3 74770V iVT 0,f AWL IMarOCS LARrG70R WM.,IN V887 Coc/NTY,a,-Ava R/MARRY LY.�'.�: WY.NO..s , O. 774E 9�yyE 4N0 774AT 6610 SNORT QUBGV/8/ON IS A(LCaE W/7F/ Or-744E WG6T MORG/N O�FMV.MARY 3�7C NWy.N0.5 FREE CoNSE V7"AND IN ACCORDANCE 911774 77/8 0L4/RE OT 77,E EX6/M/AED AND APPROVED 7G/S—CMy OP ,/ca—. 4N0.5297a9L.A 4 7Rs•. Ed3Thfen6PN OT7NC EdST V Ow.a/E�'!s 4.41�y.VERLJAO COA.'57 L�CTtCNI CO• _ VALLEY LV60/WaY.EXpe-P-77/E A6977//tlopoDRE -7T•404Ed4 Gtl••t"T 70 EASGMEM7J,R RN9177Q../9 AND 7R40'/0 C.K/MELR 778S7II GT/ON$ Cr RP_Cp4o,AVG/-00//V.7O. r 44E0701N CA3DA45N7-45 FWc-../'+Fn UNDER AU0/70R.,F/LE EX4/M/NOD A.JO APPRDVCO 7/4.0 Clay or /998— NO. 700800039.5. ACKNOWLEDGMENT aum.D. c.41.0 2nY/NG 0/.43C.7D4 5Ta77C Or W45///NGTGNt v/rl0AwD AFfaa5VC0 7nitl�ay oc ma— LEGEND COUNTY CS,-IC./ f 77416 O 70 CARr77Y 77. r ON 71fEAiy O.Or /78_/45�aic AIC,7.4G /dA<w4i EX./WI/VAR - - ••'JET S!'RE1fK,14��j eOlCOOISO 11941 !5/4ia/E0,4 I- 7S Y FX L81.1G PERSDNALI.Y IAGCf jlCq O•.SET Sias car GoORD OF GARY MGRLNVO tDY5771 T10N CO.,A~7'NLA_SA/iP, EX4 40.180 AND AR7sOYCD 77l/S___POy /!d_. 70 MC ISSWN 70 GIE 77V8 h.&FR83 NTR-77VE__ OF S7/D CDRPORA7-101‘.1, MK/O ,•;• .90-7 RAC.Na/L EXEC,/7ED 777/E W/77//NANO R7REl0.Nb /.WWRUNFNT AND ACX/VOWLEDO,E0.3440 IN,7R1945NT 70 5E 7.4E FREE AND VOLUNr2LRV 4CT AND GEED QC.14/0 •• /ROPASGD PROPERTY OaRA4ER R7R7NE43H/P FOR 774E GCYS 4N0 S I, E5 7* ISSlN MEN770N1ED,4N0 ON 0671/ oLE .?TE7e9 7NAT 77..ay WERE 771E/ND/VILYI 5.4&77.? IZ4,0 7D E.Kac/•7C!4,0 4•E1�15TWC UTILITY insinzumEN77 A.EX/ST/,N5 FIRE HYDR ORA Mfr SC*.Mr W8VCAS AN/44,10 AND C1FF/G/4L.E4L 771E L]Oy.MVD y.E4R F7F6T MdN77O.AE0 AeoVE 0 co' m — 1 Rat A/so"Da Nei G000 cr my/. c.70N,gmYOn,M a'r NW%4,NEY4.,30-23-5 Asa anrluAn �� luln a.�GARY MERLINO CONSTRUCTION CO. fa I. ...r •+• •• 1W *,•.P�b•�r N...miff., ��E F cMs�� TOINNSEND-CHASTAIN &ASSOC.,INC. �.. A H ■ ` r..t ., 1 4r.m•• In m..m/. .xr be ••f•ir� ■w. fumy ;! - tiN,, !� / Ill DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS BOUNDARY SURVEY f4•— r M• ^f•••1 i1 �4ti A.1 r K.nf.r.r 644/MeRUN0 cD^/ST•C0. e. LAND SURVEYORS I•AyNE E. U745 7/N .- 4 i2'� "'6 `�` '�� `A 409 SOUTH3rd AVENUE TAX LOT 103 ' �""" �; Gam. K �,\`, *E'4`SJ KENT•WASH/NOTON AT •``l 441 LAND 12061 854-2043 n CD .•..• R:.6O' f Sc. S.A.A 4mi (RqR� M. /0336 mown `..n JAJJ.,/9 ' I r.mc I.93079 I. f BEGINNING OF FILE FILE TI\` e�/%" / t MICROFILMED 01/8 *OG vp,.., .. . _ „ , .. , , 1 ___ , OF R�� S.'= .. O THE CITY OF RENTON o t$ a �~+ MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER o 9,0 co. FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 o94TFD SEPTEM' May 12, 1986 David L. Halinen, P.E. AnMarCo ,, 9125 - 10th rite-5out- Seattl ashington, 9810) Re Short Nat 018-86 Dear Mr. • Please find enclosed your check and a copy of your appeal. As the April 25, 1986 letter from Roger. Blaylock indicated, your appeal, if one were to be filed, was to be filed not later than 5:00 P.M. on Friday. May 9, 1986. Your appeal was not filed in p timely fashion since it was received after the appropriate time. Jurisdication in this matter is dependant upon timely filing and therefore, jurisdication did not attach. Your appeal must be rejected. Sincerely, Q .ICC"jr.".••••...••••••0. FRED J. KA FMAN HEARING EXAMINER FJK/dk cc: -Mayor Shinpoch City Attorney Blaylock ,RogerCity Clerk • ~ .ik fits j fnt c tr 3tK;l r°c' 9125- 10th Avenue South 762-9125 Seattle,Washington 98108 vEMay 9, 1986 r44, ;' MAY - 91986 Land Use Hearing Examiner CITY OF RENT ON City of Renton 1 ARip� , EXAMINER 200 Mill Ave. South Renton, Washington 98055 RE: Short Plat 018-86 Appeal of Zoning Administrator's Decision Pursuant to Renton City Code Section 4-3011(B) , we hereby request that the Hearing Examiner reverse the Zoning Administrator's decision of April 25th (copy enclosed) to reject our short application SP-018-86. The Zoning Examiner erred in rejecting the application because he failed to comply with the Subdivision Ordinance's requirement that "(s)hort plats . . . be approved, disapproved or returned to the applicant within thirty (30) days from date of submission unless the subdivider consents to 'an extension of the time period." Renton Code Section 9-1105.5. Because our January 23rd application submittal was not "rejected" until April 25th, and because we did not consent to an extension of the time period, the purported rejection of the application is untimely and of no effect. See Norco Construction v. King County, 970 Wn.2d 680. The Zoning Administrator should be directed to complete the processing of the short plat because the size of all of the proposed lots is con- sistent with the L-1 zoning of the site that was in effect during the thirty-day approval period. The subsequent change of the site vicinity's zoning to MP (when the,Valley Rezone became effective on April 23, 1986) does not alter the Zoning Administrator's duty to process this short plat in accordance with the L-1 zone requirements that were in effect during the thirty-day period. Please also note that in addition to the purported rejection of our short plat application, the Zoning Administrator, in his April 25th letter, also discussed dedication of land within the proposed short plat for the P-9 Channel. While we do not deny that the City has authority in appropriate circumstances to require the reservation or dedication of necessary easements and rights-of-ways for public streets Page 2 and utilities, we do dispute the appropriateness of a dedication con- dition being attached to this short plat. However, because the Zoning Administrator's discussion of dedications is apparently not an admin- istrative determination that land for the P-9 Channel must be reserved or dedicated, no appealable decision on that issue appears to exist. Sincerely, AnMarCo % � j vid L. Ha'inen, P.E. of J A ., .VI:emZth ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR amin 09 �� MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 0 235-2540 0,9gT�D SEGO1' SEP BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR April 25. 1986 Mr. David L. Halinen. P.E. An Marco 9125 10th Avenue South Seattle. Washington RE: Short Plat 018-86 Dear Mr. Halinen: Recently in the application review process by.the Building and Zoning Department of the four lot short plat application submitted by yourself for AnMarco on January 23. 1986 with additional information submitted on February 21. 1986. it came to our attention that either the short plat must be modified or rejected in its present form. In the processing of development applications before a governmental body in the State of Washington the issue of when a proposal is "vested" always appears. Specifically what regulations are utilized to review the application request. In this specific case. your application was recieved prior to the enacted of an area wide rezone which rezoned the subject site to MR Manufacturing Park. Your application request was not "vested" under the previous zoning. Land use applications such as short plats do not "vest" a property owner under the existing zoning designations.. Only the application for a building permit "vests" a property owner. This is termed the "Bright Line Rule". The proposal as submitted does not meet the minimum lot area requirements of one acre in the MP. Manufacturing Park Zone. Also the setback requirements of the MP Zone would make proposed Lot 4 unbuildable. The application could be revised to two lot short plat and comply with the requirements of the MP. Manufacturing Park Zone. The only other option that the Building and Zoning.Department has is reject the application outright. Please contact me in writing by Friday. May 2. 1986. if you plan to revise the short plat application. David Halinen/AnMarco/SP-018-86 April 25. 1986 Page 2 The only other issue that was raised in the review process was whether the dedication of the P-9 Channel was appropriate. The City in previous decision concerning the filling of the subject site has specifically limited the filling of the northern 90 feet because it is a natural water way. Natural watercourses whether they are intermittent or perineal are protected. The City does have the right to require the reservation or dedication of necessary easements and rights-of-ways for public streets and utilities. Storm water drainage is a critical public utility. Under Section 4-3011(B) appeals of administrative decisions must be made within 14 days of the date of the decision. Therefore, an appeal would have to be submitted by 5 p.m. on Friday. May 9. 1986. If I can be of any further help in clarifying these issues please call me at 235-2550. Sincerely. Roger J. Blaylock Zoning Administrator RJB;rjb 2366Z OF RA,+ oo ' , o BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT �s � p RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR O ® MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 ® 235-2540 90 co• 0 917 o SEP1'�O�P BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR April 16. 1986 Mr. David L. Halinen. P.E. AnMarco 9125 10th Avenue South Seattle, Washington 98108 RE: SHORT PLAT-018-86 (2600 EAST VALLEY ROAD) Dear Mr. Halinen: The City of Renton is continuing in its processing of the above referenced short plat. Please be aware that as a matter of law. the environmental review process is excluded from any time limits prescribed under both state and local ordinances. Therefore, the 30 day period is not in effect. The Environmental Review Committee is considering both the environmental and legal aspects of the proposal. Thank you for your concern and inquiry in this matter. The City will respond as promptly to this matter as possible. Sincerely, Roger J. Blaylock Zoning Administrator RJB:ss 2350Z OF R4,4, BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR 0 mom MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 co. 0,9gTFO SEPlei‘ BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR MEMORANDUM DATE: April 16, 1986 TO: Larry Warren, City Attorney FROM: ..Roger J. Blaylock, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: GARY MERLINO SHORT PLAT, FILE NO. SH.PL-018-86 DIVISION OF PROPERTY CONTRARY TO PENDING ZONING REGULATIONS Pursuant to our telephone conversation of last week, I am following up with my understanding of your verbal response to several questions. The first situation is that Gary Merlino has requested a short plat of property along East Valley Highway that is presently allowed under the zoning code. However, with the adoption of the new area-wide zoning for the Valley, the property in question would become non-buildable as a result of setback requirements. It is my understanding that the City does have the right to inform and control the development of the property based upon the pending ordinance. In fact, the underlying Comprehensive Plan clearly showed the property as Manufacturing Park which would imply the anticipated setback requirements. In addition, the issue of dedication of the P-9 Channel was raised. It appears that the City has the right to require dedication for public uses including streets and utilities. The P-9 Channel location has been firmly established as part of not only the City plan but by the Soil Conversation Service plan. In fact, an extensive environmental impact statement have been prepared on the design proposals and have not been challenged in court. If the dedication and construction (the P-9 and P-1 Channel) were not completed, serious environmental damage would occur. In the past, the applicant had received fill permits based upon a solution for the entire storm water drainage issue in the Green River Valley. If the above two points of my understanding are not correct, please contact me immediately for clarification. RJB:ss 2351Z i AN 9125- 10th Avenue South 762-9125 Seattle,Washington 98108 April 14,i1986 I City of Renton Building .and Zoning Department 200 Mill Avenue S. Renton, WA 98055 ATTN: Mr;. Roger Blaylock RE: SH.P,L-018-86 (2600 E. Valley Road) I • • Dear Mr. Blaylock: I . We are still awaiting completion of City processing of the above- referenced short plat. I ' Please ,be; aware that, as a matter of right, we_.expect processing of this short plat under City ordinances in effect at the end of the th' rt-day period following our application since the short plat was not "approved, disapproved or returned within thirty (30) days" and since we did not consent to an extension of the time period. Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. Sincerely, ANMARCO 1 • (ty cA.„,..; ,� David L. 'Halinen, P.E. Engineer i CITY OF Rp N ENTO 4 r F t Y♦ APR 141986 LC ti :. A _ 9125 10th Avenue South (::iY OF R:NiO:a 762-912 �Se�#tl� VVorship_gtoir9q108 March 18, 1986 MAR 1 8 086 EU1!D1NGlr ONiNG DEPT. City of Renton Environmental Review Committee 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 RE: ECF-017-86/SH. PL-018-86 (SHORT PLAT LOCATED AT 2600 EAST VALLEY ROAD) Gentlemen: We object to the proposed P-9 channel dedication condition of approval, suggested by Design Engineering in its March 5th "Environmental Checklist Review" (copy enclosed) . This proposed condition of approval is not rationally related to the proposed short plat and is unfair. As Engineer Don Monaghan told me yesterday in response to my inquiry concerning P-9 channel construction scheduling, it may be ten years before the channel is built (if it ever is built) . Further, con- struction of the channel across the subject site would primarily benefit the public at large while benefitting the subject property owners only tangentially. Given the uncertainty of the channel project's construction and the fact that the benefit of such a project, if ever built, will be to the public at large, requiring right-of-way dedication for the channel as a condition of this short plat, would be both unreasonable and unfair. We thus urge the ERC to recommend approval of the short plat without the proposed channel dedication condition. Sincerely, ANMARCO DAVID L. HALINEN, P.E. Engineer Enclosure cc: Mr. Gary Merlino EI_._.tONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEE REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: P( (.._J( :U' DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 4, 1986 COMMENTS DUE: MARCH 13, 1986 ECF - 017 86'., CiTY OF MEN I.ON. APPLICATION NO(s). ;SHORT PLAT 018-86 MAR 4 " 1986 PROPONENT: ANMARCO FORMERLY GARY MERLINO CONSTRUCTION CO POLICY nn`rLOPME::T "7". PROJECT TITLE: GARY MERLINO SHORT PLAT BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO SUB-DIVIDE 5.61 ACRES INTO 4 LOTS LOCATION: PROPERTY. LOCATED ON EAST" VALLEY RD AT THE 2600 BLOCK SITE AREA: 244,231 sq ft BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS ADEQUATE INADEQUATE 1) . Earth 2)" . Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) _ Land and Shoreline Use 9) ' Housing . . - 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare , 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation ' 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: j RECOMMENDATION: DNS D , MITIGATED DNS [] EIS REVIEWED BY: (54-Ve / i' ) v,lSe►'N TITLE: 45SiS-L4Z-F • . DATE: 3I rI 1g(U FORM #14 * RENT( BUILDING & ZONING DEPA IAENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 017 86 CITY OF-RENTON APPLICATION NO(S) : SHORT PLAT 018-86 MAR 4 1986 PROPONENT: ANMARCO FORMERLY 'GARY MERLINO CONSTRUCTION CO PnHry fF"FL OQr.MENT n=PT PROJECT TITLE : GARY MERLINO "SHORT PLAT BRIEF DESCRIPTION 'OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO SUB-DIVIDE 5.61- ACRES INTO '4 LOTS LOCATION : PROPERTY LOCATED ON EAST VALLEY RD Al THE 2600 BLOCK TO: E PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : ENGINEERING 'DIVISION El TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION El FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT 71POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT . OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY .5: 00 P .M. ON . REVIEWING- DEPARTMENT/DIVISION fLIcV OEVefDJA/}1 WI7 %.026El APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS El NOT APPROVED, ct 8-9/7ata2/14 pLetLA;1„04 et.-71/44-e-.24 - eXe 47°4 - tat,;,0.,102c.;.„r sc..7. . e Off= 6 G Jtt- -pq 14-/N � DATE: -3112/S4 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 El tONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEE REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 27.1) A I (U DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 4, 1986 COMMENTS DUE: MARCH 13, 1986 ECF - 017 _ 86 APPLICATION NO(s). SHORT PLAT 018-86 PROPONENT: ANMARCO FORMERLY GARY MERLINO CONSTRUCTION CO PROJECT TITLE: GARY MERLINO SHORT PLAT BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO SUB-DIVIDE 5.61 'ACRES INTO 4 LOTS LOCATION: PROPERTY LOCATED ON EAST VALLEY RD AT THE 2600 BLOCK SITE AREA: 244,231 sq ft BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS ADEQUATE INADEQUATE 1) . Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants ?;:\ 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health ?>'<(iE 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 7< 10) Aesthetics 11) , Light and Glare 12) Recreation . 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services . 16) Utilities COMMENTS: RECOMMENDATION: kf DNS El MITIGATED DNS Ej EIS n REVIEWED BY:�, L - TITLE:" q� DATE: S / 6/J 80 FORM #14 • RENTC" BUILDING & ZONING DEPAP'r'MENT 41. DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 017 - 86 APPLICATION NO(S) : SHORT PLAT 018-86 PROPONENT : ANMARCO FORMERLY GARY MERLINO CONSTRUCTION CO PROJECT TITLE: GARY MERLINO SHORT PLAT BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO SUB-DIVIDE 5.61 ACRES INTO 4 LOTS LOCATION : PROPERTY LOCATED ON EAST VALLEY RD Al THE 2600 BLOCK TO: : a PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC. DATE : ENGINEERING DIVISION EJTRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : OUTILITIES ENG , DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU OPARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT j-B-Ui-bBI444 ZONING DEPARTMENT LIPOLICE DEPARTMENT F-1 POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M. ON. , REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 7 c)rol L APPROVED 11] APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED . Ct. DATE: ('-/q`1&-, SIGNATURE OF DIRECTO OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE , REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 (_ ONMENTAL CHECKLIST, REVIEW SHEEN I REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 4, 1986 COMMENTS DUE: MARCH 13, 1986 ECF - 017 _ 86 - • APPLICATION NO(s). SHORT PLAT 018-86 PROPONENT: ANMARCO' FORMERLY GARY MERLINO CONSTRUCTION CO PROJECT TITLE: GARY MERLINO SHORT PLAT BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO SUB-DIVIDE 5.61 ACRES INTO 4 LOTS LOCATION: PROPERTY LOCATED ON EAST VALLEY RD AT THE 2600 BLOCK SITE AREA: 244,231 sq ft BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS ADEQUATE INADEQUATE 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) utilities COMMENTS: W(To5ed. uu% a have no on CH-\/ s \-octyoc evy\d/ kftcicac3c- on . RECOMMENDATION: DNS D MITIGATED DNS EIS REVIEWED BY: ( ' JZA/C& L TITLE: 114-147474. Dee4ifirtoP ky DATE: 4)1 I/ 1110 FORM #14 RENTC" BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 017 86 APPLICATION NO(S) : SHORT PLAT 018-86 PROPONENT; ., ANMARCO FORMERLY GARY MERLINO CONSTRUCTION CO PROJECT TITLE ; GARY MERLINO SHORT PLAT BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO SUB-DIVIDE 5.61 ACRES INTO 4 LOTS A LOCATION : PROPERTY LOCATED ON EAST VALLEY RD AT THE 2600 BLOCK TO : 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : ENGINEERING DIVISION El TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE ; UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION El FIRE PREVENTION . BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT 0 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT El POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P .M. ON . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; PAcKS pA4ROVED 0 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS. 0 NOT APPROVED DATE; 3 J U ' SIGP004(vcabc7T, TUROF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE ' REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 / ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 4, 1986 COMMENTS DUE: MARCH 13, 1986 ECF - 017 _ 86 APPLICATION NO(s). SHORT PLAT 018-86 PROPONENT: ANMARCO FORMERLY GARY MERLINO CONSTRUCTION CO PROJECT TITLE: GARY MERLINO SHORT PLAT BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO SUB-DIVIDE 5.61 ACRES INTO 4 LOTS LOCATION: PROPERTY LOCATED ON EAST VALLEY RD AT THE 2600 BLOCK SITE AREA: 2114,231 sq ft BUILDING AREA (gross): , IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS ADEQUATE INADEQUATE 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health ' 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation_ ._ 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: RECOMMENDATION: DNS J-i , MITIGATED DNS El EIS REVIEWED BY`12 � TITLE: C� DATE: 73 "13 FORM #14 RENT( BUILDING & ZONING DEPAI WENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 017 - 86 APPLICATION NO(S) : SHORT PLAT 018-86 PROPONENT : ANMARCO FORMERLY GARY MERLINO CONSTRUCTION CO PROJECT TITLE : GARY MERLINO SHORT PLAT BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO SUB-DIVIDE 5.61 ACRES INTO 4 LOTS LOCATION : PROPERTY LOCATED ON EAST VALLEY RD Al THE 2600 BLOCK TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 0 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION El FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU El PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT 0 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT ❑ POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 0 OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P .M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : IZIAPPROVED DAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED �P � DATE : -3-73-PC SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 • `./ EV-_;_;ONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEE,- REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: U I I' L_ I T/ . DATE CIRCULATED: , MARCH 4, 1986 COMMENTS DUE: MARCH '13, 1986 ECF - 017 _ 86 , • APPLICATION NO(s).. SHORT PLAT 018-86 PROPONENT: ANMARCO FORMERLY GARY MERLINO CONSTRUCTION CO PROJECT TITLE: GARY MERLINO SHORT PLAT ' BRIEF DESCRIPTION OFPROJECT: APPLICATION TO SUB-DIVIDE 5.61 ACRES INTO 4 LOTS LOCATION: PROPERTY LOCATED ON EAST VALLEY RD AT THE 2600 BLOCK SITE AREA: 244,231 sq ft BUILDING AREA (gross): ' IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS ADEQUATE INADEQUATE 1) Earth y , 2)• Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources. 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services ,/, 16) Utilities COMMENTS: RECOMMENDATION: EZ(DNS [] MITIGATED DNS ED, EIS (`)1 REVIEWED BY: TITLE: ort4i DATE: 3/ /2 / 6 FORM #14 RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 017 - 86 APPLICATION NO(S) : SHORT PLAT 018-86 PROPONENT : ANMARCO FORMERLY GARY MERLINO CONSTRUCTION CO PROJECT TITLE : GARY MERLINO SHORT PLAT BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO SUB-DIVIDE 5.61 ACRES INTO 4 LOTS LOCATION : PROPERTY LOCATED ON EAST VALLEY RD AT THE 2600 BLOCK TO: f . 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 0 ENGINEERING DIVISION flTRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 5UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU ' 0 PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT El BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT El POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT El OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVI ,ION : UT/L/Ty 4N,C//V .g/ & El APPROVED D APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ✓• NOT APPROVED U?Iufy e IWJLUWMPROVAL SUBJECT TO b '� tor _ LATE C 'RS AGREEMENT-WATER ENO i LATE COWS AGREEMENT-SEWER No SYSTEM OEfl PMENT CHARGE-WATER ' y S fib.04/L 244�23/SQ.FT = e9 7( ?if- 1Z0 . 9 6. ?4 SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-SEWER �/.zs �'p,p¢�� 9 rfG9 .elf e -h/ZD= )'9d'df- 24 SPECIAL ANENT AREA CHARGE-WATER ND ;-%';/f �gf h®�- , `/9 2 9�:4' SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE-SEWER NO APPROVED WATER PLAN �y APPROVED SEWER PLAN / n nAPPRDYEa f�YhAANT LOCATIONS )(by`(� ...3 ‘41 FIRE FLOW ill I IP`' DATE: 3/ /670 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 „r El tONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEE REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: IC A) ” DATE CIRCULATED:: MARCH 4, 1986 COMMENTS DUE: MARCH 13, 1986 ECF - 017 86 ' APPLICATION NO(s): SHORT PLAT 018-86. PROPONENT: ANMARCO FORMERLY GARY MERLINO CONSTRUCTION CO PROJECT TITLE: ' GARY MERLINO SHORT PLAT BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO SUB-DIVIDE 5.61 ACRES INTO 4 LOTS LOCATION: PROPERTY LOCATED ON EAST VALLEY RD AT THE 2600 BLOCK SITE AREA: 24,231 sq ft BUILDING.AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON.ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS ADEQUATE INADEQUATE 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) ; Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources ✓ 7) Environmental Health ✓ _ 8) Land and Shoreline Use !� 9) Housing 1✓ 10) Aesthetics ✓ 11) Light and Glare i✓ 12) Recreation I/ 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation f 15) Public Services 16) Utilities ,,/ COMMENTS: iyert :4- sel 'g'',,/,!=i/-- i-/ i,r,er, --( 4e- /44-(-- ?- 9-62,4„,:,,4.( RECOMMENDATION:' .. Fr DNS. [J MITIGATED DNS Q EIS REVIEWED BY: '!U"- i,--- TITLE: e.7.c.x__ DATE: -3/s/efli FORM #14 RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 017 : - 86 APPLICATION NO(S) : SHORT PLAT 018-86. PROPONENT ; ANMARCO FORMERLY GARY MERLINO CONSTRUCTION CO PROJECT TITLE : GARY MERLINO SHORT PLAT BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO SUB-DIVIDE 5.61 ACRES INTO 4 LOTS LOCATION ; PROPERTY LOCATED ON EAST VALLEY RD AT THE 2600 BLOCK TO; El PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : E ENGINEERING DIVISION . Ei TRAFFIC ENG. D'IVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION a FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT El BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT E] POLICY DEVELOPMENT, DEPARTMENT = , 0 OTHERS ; COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION; APPROVED " .E APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS a NOT APPROVED i) U ,-6 '-�� -�- r o DATE: SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 , - EN DNMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEE`. r REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: (G DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 4, 1986 COMMENTS DUE: MARCH 13, 1986 ECF - 017 - 86 • APPLICATION NO(s). SHORT PLAT. O'18-86 PROPONENT: ANMARCO FORMERLY GARY MERLINO CONSTRUCTION CO PROJECT TITLE: GARY MERLINO SHORT PLAT BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF. PROJECT: APPLICATION TO SUB-DIVIDE 5.61 ACRES INTO 4 LOTS LOCATION: PROPERTY LOCATED ON EAST VALLEY RD AT THE 2600 BLOCK SITE AREA: 244,231 sq ft BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS ADEQUATE INADEQUATE 1) Earth 2)• Air_ 3) Water L- 4) , Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health • , 8) Land and Shoreline Use - 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and, Glare - 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation • 14) Transportation S �� 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: . D f , (4, e RECOMMENDATION,: DNS 0 MITIGATED DNS El • EIS REVIEWED BY: TLE: DATE: g / K FORM #14 RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 017 - 86 APPLICATION NO(S) : SHORT PLAT 018-86 PROPONENT : ANMARCO FORMERLY GARY MERLINO CONSTRUCTION CO PROJECT TITLE : GARY MERLINO SHORT PLAT BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO SUB-DIVIDE 5.61 ACRES INTO 4 LOTS LOCATION : PROPERTY LOCATED ON EAST VALLEY RD AT THE 2600 BLOCK TO: n I ( PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 0 ENGINEERING DIVISION ErTRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT El POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; / /`'� APPROVED ElOVED WITH CONDITIONS El NOT APPROVED v (— s,7`'E' l ›"ram dc—v 5 /77eca cd 0.21 DATE: SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHOW ZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 EN :fJNMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEE' REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: (-- t DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 4, 1986" COMMENTS DUE:. M ' 13, 1986 ECF - 017 -86 APPLICATION NO(s).. SHORT PLAT 018.86. ; PROPONENT: ANMARCO ' FORMERLY GARY MERLINO CONSTRUCTION CO A R 4 15sE� PROJECT TITLE: GARY MERLINO SHORT PLAT BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO SUB-DIVIDE 5.61 ACRES INTO 4 LOTS LOCATION: PROPERTY LOCATED ON EAST VALLEY RD AT THE 2600 BLOCK SITE AREA: 244,231 sq ft BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS ADEQUATE INADEQUATE 1) ; Earth ' 2)• Air 3) Water 4) Plants r 5) Animals 6) Energy and.Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare Glare 12) Recreation 13') Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities L, COMMENTS: ' RECOMMENDATION: Q/ DNS r-i MITIGATED DNS ' - El EIS REVIEWED BY: ,.6%' I TITLE: .� " /17.41,'s' M DATE: Ns9FcW 7 /9 F C' FORM ##14 RENTON" BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 017 86 APPLICATION NO(S) : , SHORT PLAT 018-86 PROPONENT : ANMARCO FORMERLY GARY MERLIN() CONSTRUCTION CO PROJECT TITLE : GARY MERLINO SHORT PLAT BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO SUB-DIVIDE 5.61 ACRES INTO 4 LOTS LOCATION : PROPERTY LOCATED ON EAST VALLEY RD AT THE 2600 BLOCK TO: r PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 0 ENGINEERING DIVISION E] TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : flUTILITIES ENG . DIVISION LZFIRE PREVENTION BUREAU .. PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 0 POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT a OTHERS COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 'P .M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : PZ.FI/. QU/f 9 El4PPROVED 0 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 0 NOT APPROVED - DATE: mac,, /3S SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 E RONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHE REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:. DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 4, 1986 COMMENTS DUE: MARCH 13, 1986 ECF - 017 _ 86 APPLICATION NO(s). SHORT PLAT 018-86 PROPONENT: ANMARCO FORMERLY GARY MERLINO CONSTRUCTION CO PROJECT TITLE: GARY MERLINO SHORT PLAT BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO SUB-DIVIDE 5.61 ACRES INTO 4 LOTS LOCATION: PROPERTY. LOCATED ON EAST VALLEY RD AT THE 2600 BLOCK SITE AREA: 204,231 sq ft BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS ADEQUATE INADEQUATE 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4)' Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: 4 RECOMMENDATION: 112 DNS Ei MITIGATED DNS 1-1 EIS REVIEWED BY: TITLE: FORM #14 ///// • RENTOm. BUILDING & ZONING DEPAPTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 017 - 86 APPLICATION NO(S) ; SHORT PLAT018-86 PROPONENT : ANMARCO FORMERLY GARY MERLINO CONSTRUCTION CO PROJECT TITLE ; GARY MERLINO SHORT PLAT BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO SUB-DIVIDE 5.61 ACRES INTO 4 LOTS LOCATION ; PROPERTY LOCATED ON EAST VALLEY RD Al THE 2600 BLOCK TO: E PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : OENGINEERING DIVISION DTRAFFICENGIDIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : OUTILITIES ENG . ' DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU ETARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILD'ING�&- ivG DEPARTMENT OPOLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT [' OTHERS ; COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P .M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : APPROVED fl APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED DATE: SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 EhvsRDNMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEL REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: (S DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 4, 1986 COMMENTS DUE: MARCH 13, 1986 ECF a 017 v 86 APPLICATION NO(s), SHORT PLAT 018-86 PROPONENT: ANMARCO, FORMERLY GARY MERLINO CONSTRUCTION CO PROJECT TITLE: GARY MERLINO SHORT PLAT BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO SUB-DIVIDE 5.61 ACRES INTO 4 LOTS LOCATION: PROPERTY. LOCATED ON EAST VALLEY RD AT THE 2600 BLOCK SITE AREA: 244,231 sq ft BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS ADEQUATE INADEQUATE 1) Earth ✓ 1 2) Air 3) Water ✓ 4) Plants r✓ 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources ✓ 7) Environmental Health • 8) Land and Shoreline Use !� 9) Housing r✓ 10) Aesthetics • ✓ 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: cgdi4r. cgc- ?- 9 2�!"roe RECOMMENDATION: Ex DNS D MITIGATED DNS ED EIS REVIEWED BY:: �'''L— TITLE: DATE: 34-76 FORM #14 FIENTOm.BUILDING & ZONING DEPA7AENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 017 - 86 APPLICATION NO(S) : SHORT PLAT 018-86 PROPONENT: ANMARCO FORMERLY GARY MERLINO CONSTRUCTION CO PROJECT TITLE : GARY MERLINO SHORT PLAT BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO SUB-DIVIDE 5.61 ACRES INTO 4 LOTS LOCATION: PROPERTY LOCATED ON EAST VALLEY RD AT THE 2600 BLOCK TO: ® PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : [E] ENGINEERING DIVISION ® TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: ® UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION fl FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU EiARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT El POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT flOTHERS : ' COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE;. PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M. ON REVIEWING' DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : � � DAPPROVED ' ' EDAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED 1) ''-'144 !"-4 . ett2,277et--;r` (4-adn , . OyeArt-a g7/ -/ z-) 8a ? 9 I .N_� 0,7 /.5-4r‘ f - DATE: SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 i ✓ 1�� o L . T Y OF R E N T O FILE NO(S ): spa -P ,fl4 U es 4=1 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT EQF `Ot p6, ru .1,.NrvO MASTER APPLICATION • NOTE TO APPLICANT: Since this is a comprehensive application form, only those items related to your specific type of applications) ore to be completed. (Please print or type. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) APPLICANT TYPE OF APPLICATION NAME AnMarCo - formerly known as: FEES Gary Merlino Construction Co. Q REZONE*(FROM TO ) ADDRESS . 9 125 10th Avenue South CD SPECIAL PERMIT* CITY ZIP 0 TEMPORARY PERMIT* Seattle, WA 98 108 ��-y CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT* TELEPHONE SITE PLAN APPROVAL Q SPECIAL PERMIT FOR GRADE AND FILL 762-9125 No. of Cubic Nerds: *' CONTACT PERSON Q VARIANCE From Section: * Justification Required NAME Dave Halinen ' ADDRESS SUBDIVISIONS: $319 9125 10th Avenue South ® SHORT PLAT CITY ZIP Q TENTATIVE PLAT Seattle, WA 98108 Q PRELIMINARY PLAT TELEPHONE Q FINAL PLAT 762-9125 [.] WAIVER (Justification Required) OWNER NO. OF LOTS: Four (4) NAME PLAT NAME: Gary Merlino Construction Co. AnMarCo - formerly known as: Short Plat Gary Merlino Construction Co. ADDRESS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: 9125 10th Avenue South Q PRELIMINARY CITY ZIP 0 FINAL Seattle, WA 98108 P.U.D. NAME: TELEPHONE 762-9125 C] Residential Q Industrial Commercial a Mixed LOCATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: PROPERTY ADDRESS 2600 East Valley Road 0 TENTATIVE EXISTING USE PRESENT ZONING PRELIMINARY Undeveloped L-1 FINAL • PROPOSED USE PARK NAME: , j, .compatible with zonin ' ' p g NUMBER OF SPACES: 0 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE • ' SQ. FT. ACRES ' `""" _. AREA: 244,2-27 s q. f t. 5.6 1 ± ("TOTAL FEES :;,$319 5i r^171,^ rnr r .". 0-,,aA STAFF USE ONLY -- ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING �� 53 i�'4,a4.nt -t. il W [f) APPLICATION RECEIVED BY: �C5 lE E- '1J��' APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: 1-1 JAB! 2 31986 inn Accepted 0 Incomplete Notification Sent On By: 1.3UN >N1-3,, ,„,link" rf-; (Initials) DATE ROUTED " ADDITIONAL MATERIAL RECEIVED BY: 1 APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: 5 1/,&S El Accepted v Q Incomplete Notification Sent On By: (Initials) ROUTED TO: Building 10; Design Eng. pa y Fire Parks t3 {. Police a_, Policy Dev. L2�J Traffic Eng. J `/Utilities • REVISED 1-31-84 1 / Legal description of property (if more space is required, attach a separate sheet). That portion of the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of . Section 30, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington, lying Westerly of the West margin of primary State Hwy. No. 5 and Easterly of the East margin of the East Valley Highway. EXCEPT the North. 100.00 feet thereof. SUBJECT TO easements,, reservations and restrictions of Record, including that certain easement as recorded under Auditor's File No". 7508060393. AFFIDAVIT I, ( "Tar y Merl i on r being duly sworn, declare that I am authorize d"representative to act for the property owner,=owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TTOO BEFORE ME THIS DAY . OF 'Y�y-/L,64..,}4(--11, 19 NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, RESIDING AT (iNa,mie of Notary Public) (Signature f Owner) CTh (Address) (Address) Ste, A & r (o� (City) (State) (Zip) (Telephone). Acceptance of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete application. Plans and other materials required to constitute a complete application are listed in the "Application Procedure." Form #174 CERTIFICATION OF NOTIFICATION OF ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS/SUBDIVISION • * * *FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY* * PROJECT TITLE: APPLICANT: APPLICATION NUMBER: • The following provides a list of the names of property owners and their addresses who own land within 300 feet of the subject plat. The following provides a list of property owners and their addresses who own land within 300 feet of the subject site. The following individuals were mailed notices of the public hearing on the , subject plat as prescribed by RCW 58.17.090 and Renton City Code, Cliepl.er 11, Renton Subdivision Ordinance. ASSESSOR'S NAME ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER Burlington Northern RR 2100-1st Interstate CTR 125380-0010-03 999 - 3rd Ave. Prop. Tax Dept Seattle, WA 98104 Puget Sound Power & Light Co. Puget Power Bldg. 192305-9016-00 Bellevue, WA 98004 Glenn T. Rogge 9827-51st Ave. S.W. 302305-9003-00 Seattle, WA 98146 Mobil Oil Corp 612 South Flower Street 302305-9083-03 Olympic Pipe Line Co Los Angeles, CA 90017 Hawk Joint Owners 608 South 140th Seattle, WA 98178 302305-9098-06 Shurgard Income Properties 999 - 3rd Ave. Suite 1001 334040-0006-09 Seattle, WA 98104 Puget Sound Power'& Light Co. P.O. Box 868 302305-9002-01 Bellevue, WA 98116 Puget Sound Power & Light Co. Puget Power Bldg. 302305-9006-07 Bellevue, WA 98009 Hawk Joint Owners' 6808 South 140th 302305-9096-08 Seattle, WA 98178 Olympic Pipe Line Co. P.O.Box 236 302305-9101-01 Renton, WA 98055 + Gary Merlino Const. Co. 8630 Fauntlee Crest S.W. 302305-9103-09 Seattle, WA 98116 • 2. y a{, N 2 1986 _J ASSESSOR'S NAME ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER 1 z ASSESSOR'S --,„1 NAME ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER CERTIFICATION 1 )--- I, at -.4 1.,„, hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property owners and their ad resses were taken from the records of the King County Assessor as prescribed by law. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a _ - Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington ►esiding at5"�=-79-7 , on the ,.. :9,3e-P day of ]RIO . , 4 c SIGNED: I, , hereby certify that notices of the public meeting on the subject plat were mailed on , to each listed adjacent property owner as prescribed by law. AT TES1: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing at , on the day of . SIGNED: FORM 190 . .„, • • , . ' . 1 %.6 . I . . , N.i•J°5` . ...................;40°. 405 'NT / IU . 11 21 . 0 5.v.1. IG,T..t.Sr. ) . . • , . . .. . a ' . . OLYMPIC PIPE- 1../ILIE CO. 4-1 ( \ SITE ...... • im . .....„ . . . . • ,...... 5.W.27 71i . QIL.f. 771....4*96, . Cr SEATTLE LumBER MART . X } , . , iti J . q . > . Ill 1 .. ._, . .._ ..,3 a ii L'.:' k,.;.•:;s v:77A7 10 F f?, F.!, 1 c p 17- . . I go '3 •`:0 t..?:J L; , :1 p Lliu , ,,. M 9 0 VACINITY MAP • 1986 • SCALE 1"= 1000' BUILDING/ZONING vErst GARY 1V1ER_L IMO COMST: CO. SHORT PLAY . . . t:i� , :i LC.r. _ai P .,ro TA P/3/LE L. ' . BEARING' DIS'I`NCE . NNOR'i'rflW„' ., ,,L�+'6'iING . • . . '• • =f L lUuU.00J : . ,. ` 50UO. i3uU , , SE . 89 55 ' 56. 0 . 76. 940 999.907 507b.,940. _ 'i -- 9 :.2b .41.0 . 1236. 690 220.019 52d1.d7.6 . ... .._ 7..,' ?lei . .i39. 46',; 13 . 0 321. 750 ,-218.729 4980. 128 ' ''AE 1 52 25. 0' 1219.38U 999 939. " - 4999. 996 14E 74 25 • 26 0 U. 004 • 1000.800 5000.,U..00•, . .- . . :-:. • . , .2356. 7uU DIS`I' Th.':vE1 LD . ' . , , - .. . ' ', . . bb1891 PI:LCISIi1:u - AREL 244231 :,i 5. 6086 :,71-f33 . .,AP CriI�CK u_'.1 L(J1'� LoT '. 1 ' ' LEAPING .DISTEI:JCE ., NJRT',Ii G: , • •' EAS PING ` f, 1 0 ti ..0 i3 0. .J u u j. U U U' .' l . L, 1 52 25. 6 . 51 . 320' . 1515.044 5016.8'b • .3.., dJ. 53 56. 0 • 2.L: u5(i' , ' 1-5i-, 7 :3 ', 33 r;9 31 9 26 41. J ' •52.3. 1uu 7� ?. 117 'I: ,:,:"5321. •147 , .1iti • c i .4u 13 is 321. 750 1uUU.0u7 ' 4999. 9 J'y , S►'.. • b 22 57. 2 ' U. uu7 - 10Ui,.000 ' •50UU. UCU • . 1.57 .ti. LUJ i.)I:�•1, TRAVL''GSEU . 2.1.�224 1:12L.:1S1U1i , hi i A 13 S)370 Li: , . 3. 1997 ACROS • . ~ • �iki . xJ E,C l',i ii P1,0i'.-. L 1�.7r . . .. . .. '.:L't:i<liV:] . BISl'AN�.L lvJi`: UIi G •1', `J' l'j‘, " , lUUU.uuu .,JUJU. UuU. - :kr' i 52 25..0 1 /3 27u 1173.177 3 .• ' 5005. 635 ilG b9 55 5u. U 134. 570 117.:. 959. . 51 90.-235, ; SL 3 ''2u 41. 0 1./5. 600 '. , 939.739 . 5213. U5u . Li. 39 i5� 55. l, e.19. 650 ' iJJ. tijJ „r, 5VJU. LUu • ' ±•vY, 12 3 Ji;. :i U . Ji12 IUuti..JOU .,5U00. UUG '- • ? • . • •% 7L. •47u L.i.S `.' 'Il:F,'ViLi:SL,b • ' • 4 y 7:,11, PilL,..1�I:1t� , ii.1;.L 1 4 51 :..i,' u.uu24 Ft,:YCLu • , - , :1AP �,:l EC ti\ it, I'L::1• 1�e.7,`r' '3 - - • iCTIr(ING DisTAc:;Ci; NJR'I'iiIlia ' EASIIi: . - - luuU..UUu • ;50u0.'000 . • ' iJL 1 .52 25. 0' , 214. 190. 1214.075 r ' 5007.uU3'.. SE 69 55 "56. 0 '..'141. 95u ' 1213:908 '`'. 5146. 953 . +•' ' SE 9 :•20' 41. 0.= 217. 070 ` • 939.780 .---. ',.5164. 573 , A. . 69 55 jr,.,U • If14. 57U 593.99J ' 50JU. UO3 4►t' 64 '11 46..1.,- - U. (AA" 1UUJ.uJU 500u. 000 1 . 757 766 ;:i3'I' TRAVEI;SLJ' tj -' - - 2095u1 PRGC.ISI3L4 ' ., 1 AR LA 34952 SFU. 6024 1iCRLj a ' 'MAP Cii C :4 & PLOT - (.CT 4 s , . LEARIfG.'GISTAiiCE N:�l:'I'HING •. , LAST1'E Na.'r )i'r.., :i i .ia tfi �1 _ iI �• � 'of 1Uuu. jUU 5000.Ot�'d' y.:�. '.r !.:.:�- ,... �j it t • ' LIE 1 52 25. 0'- 316. 610',. 1316.441 ''5010. 0 P,;2 '�L_ri) SE 89 .55 . 56..0 .78. 940 - 11316 347 5089.2"9'1', - ;IAINI- .,J'.jg86' -• • ' ;. SE '' 9 '26 41.0 320.duU • 999.837 :;', :',5141. 943`: ' - . . N'ii 89. 55 .5u. 0 ' . 141. 950 , .1000.005 • . "'-4999.993_a 'fL'i:,1b'�_ 'Mt\I '' 1 :+ 9. - '= SE -54 •'2 3 6. 8 ' 'u. 008 1000.000' :, 500.0.000' ` -,;.;,.;- - -+y , . . 135is.360 DIST TRAVERSED" ;' ;;1 ,AREk -: 34949 'SF•:..- ,:,.:0.8023'';ACRBS .. • .,...`:.' ke$a:i::xE..u:F.^+"'�Gi'e•.'o:.. . ,.,._.. ..,:. .. : . p� •t�'z7 e v:iyGiT�.s9tl'a9 nll• c Quit Claim Deed ' IF! ( t.:�<� JAB+ 2 31986 THE GRANTOR, PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, a Washington corporation,for and in consideration of Ten Dollars ($10'. 00) and other valual2ie consideration ' )conveys and quit claims to 'GARY' MERLINO CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, a Partnership, the following described real estate, situated in the County of : " King. State of Washington: That portion of the. Northwest 1/4 of- the Northeast 1/4 of Section 30,, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , lying westerly of the west margin of Primary State Highway No: 5 arid lying easterly of the east margin of the East Valley ' Highway; Less the northerly 100 'feet thereof. . - Subject to: Easements, restrictions and' reservations"" of record, including that certain easement recorded 'under King County Auditor's File No. 7508060393. This Quit Claim Deed is given ii ' fulfillment of that certail Real '" . Estate Contract dated July 17, .1975, recorded July 29 , '1975, under , King County Auditor' s File No. 7507290364 , real estate excise sales tax paid under' receipt No. E3126913( • IN WITNESS WHEREOF,said corporation has caused this instrument to be executed by its proper officer this //' day of al . 19 78 t. SALES TAX PAID ON CON I RA CT AIT O.I •/°7lF9� PUGET SOUND W & LIG OM CO. AN:COPS liiVll BY Title Manager-Real Estate Division N........4- 1 .. _....... , pEPUTY STATE OF WASHINGTON ) COUNTY OF. . KING ) . . . . / 1978 the undersi ed, LESLIE. A. DONNER. , On tk�i�. day ofus?� , before tne, gn 4 t li h''k,, „ be the f�` er-RPs1 Estate Divi Sinn of PUGET SOUND POWER& LIGHT COMPANY, the .4o�po ation:t t't ,ttcuted the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary ;` aCt and,deed. a 'forppration,for the uses and purposes therein mentioned,and on oath stated that he is authorized to ' xecuti the sai 'itrsttument. • u I.� ' ,'*WNESS,i`Y hard and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first above written. Notary, Public in and for the State of Washington, • Washington, residing at 61/ • OF R4-.� ECF: I 0/7- g • di amm 9% ..p z City of Renton LU: �� -vIA-Pr-� Z . ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST o9�rEo sEP � P .. Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43,21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for allproposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies_can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impacts. Use of Checklist for Nonproject Proposals: (Please Type or Print Legibly) Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered'does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist'to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: , • 2. Name of applicant: GARY MERLINO CONSTRUCTION CO. , INC. 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: , 9125 - 10th Ave. South Seattle, WA 98108 762-9125 Gary Merlino or Dave Halinen 4. Date checklist prepared:. 2/18/86 C@TiY ��M 5. Agency requesting checklist: city of Renton e A, P" \ v/ f‘ [1:1 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): �EB 1� 6 March 1, 1986 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansions, or'ruz=ther activity related to or connected with this proposal? if yes, explain. No • 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. None 9.. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? if yes, explain. No • 10. List any governmental approvals,or permits that will.be needed for your proposal:, if known. City of Renton 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. To Short Plat Property " ",€'? 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the ,site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topography map, if reasonably available. While .you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The Short P;at is for the 5.61 acre site that lies between East Valley Road and SR167, North of S.W. 27th Street. The site is being filled in conformance with Bldg. permit (B9951) pursuant to grading and filling special permit_ # SP-062-77. A business known as Lumber- Market occupies the parcel south of the site, while underground pipeline appurtenances occupies the Olympic Pipeline Co.:owned parcel to.the' North.,* B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS , 1. EARTH . a. General description, of the, site (circle ,.one)c dirril rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous. other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 3% • c. . What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, caly, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. f•Clay, Sand, Gravel, Fill d. Are there surface indications or history of unsteOie guile in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe.' Yes. ' Most sites in area ;require a,,preload - 2 - e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Fill by permit SP-062-77 f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. No g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? None h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: None 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. None • b. Are there any off-site sources of emission? No • c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: None • 3. WATER S. . , 1 :! fP iv • a. Surface: 1) Is.there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes,, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No' 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None - 3 - 4) Will the proF_:::1 require surface water withdraw.. or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximately quantities if known. No • 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and appaoximately quantities if known. No ' 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals . . .; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. No 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally( • describe: No - 4 - d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: None 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: o deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other o evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other o Shrubs C grass o crop or grain o Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other ❑ water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other ❑ other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? None . c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: None 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: Hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None C. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. None - 5 - d. Proposed me __,=yes to preserve or enhance wildlife, •..- any:- None f15., • • • 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used.to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. None , ,t b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No eft„1r c. What kinds of energy conservation, features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to -reduce or control energy impacts, if any: None •=• _ l•; • 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, 'including exposure to toxic ' chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill. or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None • 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental. health hazards, if any: None • b. Noise - 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? None - 6 - 2) What types and levals of noise would be created by or associated with the • project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. None • 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Vacant - Land Property to South - Lumberyard b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No c. Describe any structures on the site. None d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No , • e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? L-1 • f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? L-1 g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? None h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No i. Approximately how many people would reside or. work in the completed project? None f j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None - 7 - 1. Proposed meek_pas to ensure the proposal is compa,:.Jle with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: None • rp> 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing.None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. None b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: None • 11. Light and Glare s a g f . • a. What type of light or,glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? None b. Could light or glare from the :finished project be a. .safety hazard or interfere with views?, No • c. _ What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None • d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: • None . 1 - 8 - ' 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? None • b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe.' No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant. if any: None 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation ' ' >•il, - t. a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state. or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None • 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. East Valley Road . , b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximately distance to the nearest transit stop? No . c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? None • d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No - 9 - • e. Will the proje-__,use (or occur in the immediate vice•:.__ y' of) water. rail, or air transportation? If so. generally describe. No • f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. None g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts,if any: none i .. t .<,., ,qa r;y• .,.p' i"yy.rt s•f.f,,•:e i ..r.. , 15. Public Services - a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No b. Proposed measures to reduce or control'direct'impacts on public services, if any. None ' 16. Utilities , a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: Jjectricity) �• - . (Water*efuse service eleDFone)(sanitary sewer) septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. None • - C. SIGNATURE: =� f , . -.. . "". I. the undersigned. state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. a •Proponent: G eta y ry \ daLI It).-n Cc S 1 Name Printed: � • ;_� ' ' ;rr; ;r.k=, , is - 10 - • #1.76 . H-84 ENDING OF FILE Fig nrLE