Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA80-007 4 .11 .... ,„, ... . .._vw N.••.,r .. \iik ... 0„,k.....,-11„ 1.... . i • , . \ iii , . .. ...., ,. • .. . . . . . .._.... •Aii ilikt4Pu\* „ .•4 11.111.4 - • WO" O' '11/ I ..,• • 4- A 4. oro'0 ' ..... . -"61 • • ,, •6, „Ile."..Or •'1 - • "t 4.41 \ . .1 , ......",, _.;-, ••.. ., ....001.666. " .... . 0 •et . ,, . j4: '* • . a v. , kill& r • , iititt, ,), . ...._ . .. ' s.. ver 1 . • / , .' .7, I Aic ,. . ; ' . • ,---• A it* A. , , ... .. . . , . , lit . . . : • I) .•._It.''.01• 1,. ...-••• ''' ••• ••••• " %. •._ , . . A . I I( Lt., ' .. • . ,. — .i ' ., %.•..s t....1.-..,.4.•- Iv. I . •\ I\ .1 'ilit : , .,. ir a .,,.•\tttit:;. .•uv • , k itile • .1,,, ........",."* A'. %.111•Vtlill. - -' ' -• •.1 • 0 . OM •it t• . - , r 1 ' 1\14. . - • -...;......--, .;•,t ... . ....., • . ,.. •. , • f — r • ... „ .-__ • . •, r, _..___ ............ , . • ,. - ... ' r"---—- -, * • ''t tAillt -II • •• ' T.L.• .• - A. _ .., ..i‘ . •.4. •,... ".." '.109... — at,. •I-- . . .. t • , _.----- . .....,4.rt..; :. 4...• %. . . -4 . ,,.. t1•At et'.',' : • ,-. i v. • - _. _ - ' 4. - -• , • • • . .' - rlia .. . fl " ..: ..t. .. , . 1.• '. II • . - ...... .. It •I' $v....! ••••" ' ' . L. - I. ' At‘14- .., III . ,. lis - • _ •••• •..vir+ .- •a 4: • .A, , _.., ... . . ... .... .... , , .... ,..... . ...„..„........ , ::tli,... . .. - • ,,,... , , . .. •-.... . • • V - % V ,. I . • • - A.' r- • _k t ,-- • , .• '.• • - f‘ vs r _ . ..., I - • ‘ , - • . . • •"a 1! A _ ... - • - ----,ji, . 4. i lk: --••••-7•""" ... 1 • .4140. '‘ I • i ... -...... .... .... 3 ., s Ilk . - . . .i ' ' ' ' • $ ,• , • ., . • II" 1.....I'. • ,•. -,". .-:••:•‘.1, gii •am 4., t, NI.' i jihr' . _ \ • . C.1 'I.'14... ' . " INK., lilt -"a „...: . . 4 . ,.,. i A - . t. ...'' . t •'. a •.. "4-111.'I,1•4,I..... • r.4 -! - Ikri . . . 44. :::.lr... , ik 4 • 1\j,0,.. r".: • , ', L...- 4 . iit , • ,.-. .. , ' . :26 .111.. 11.40 ... 't.'1'•-•. • . or ... = ' 1 . . • . ilf..6. . - . • •- _ r. ,•' . .: - • • - ,.- crio.• * . '6- --- . ; II , ,, . .• - a „mi./A 1 I .00 • . I 1 P' •', • , .., \ t, . al. .11, 6 1111 II' :ii ,.., . - - ) 4 A ' v 34„.. ' emZij t I • . •. - r ".•.. .f.':‘ s —:--:. "Ks:: i IL • 1 -it 4.. • _ ..... . ',.S10 :g'' L ...• ai Ve ' • „. ., ,ADY. • ' ' • I.' . ' S. 0 ' .40' -''?, . ! A itill • V. . • ir - ' tribibic:Ill'L .', ,, , ‘ '• RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER JAN 151980 AM PM 7,819110111112111213141516 1N3hr4 • �' ' fib ' EXHIBIT T� O. Li Il�o �f o X ':w �r �z ITEM NO. o-� 7- O G C �3 a 1 (,�- �b6-- 79) \ \>,od `�'' �. ti I i Kramer,Chin&Mayo,Inc. P O O i 0 Q^ Client: 50E/NG ,I PARKING= L-:DT # // / i [) i - oi_ a -- . Z Nis- - • _ Z_O • ' 4`- . �� ' ••4 SJ '. ;. 7- ;I ' • - " - - -- . 1 E r,; `� „ .n II 6'i f•i> /,'",\''j\�,j j%z, L i i.! f r- +. PARK1t\lG: . ;: , I Li 'mi �'2 � -�? t/ __,_, ,,,eet_z:../-,/ • SAC i [ON -- • 1 r r) ., __ _ Cc��� o�JGD_P... -_ . -. 2`X-I2.1'_PR 35L3RE CKEAT ED:.T.1 M ESERS._--- _: • . _.. ._ _�.»_ ___s .'v ..i l-..— _ y _. — ... _ -F .. ._ _ .. - /7'; - . - • 4L r. 7 - i . . . . . . . .. _. . ._ . . . _ • /2 /V 5, 0 liA SGr�E,EAl .2//b/I J it JOB NO. BY CHECK SUBJECT DATE SHEET' i � � � . �_--�___' _-_ -_'_-- ___ '__� --__ _-� --_ _ - ' __-'_' _- _'_' - __-` � , � ''. `- � ~�''' ,` `, `/ � . ' ' ^ . � � . � / � �, ' `_� � � ^/ , � � ' ' - r ��� ` � W* � � ^� Kramer,Chin&Mayo,Inc. .S P -- 00 7 - $O CI ient: /3 E/NG PAIAR/NO LOT Al /l • f..., -..• -. _ • . .. . . , . : „ r _„. PARKING __zl =To"— _ : G'_p'� I _. �_:_ g�_.�,ti 'e), f -A .. . . _ ' .- . . _.. _LDw 2�-3.- _) . ��R�/ eN-4as ----- . - /Z C1A b_ - V /Z. ✓, ,1 5/D/'.S 1�:Aal/ �F� V//S(Iei fix., ` f �: `%_,f �U f . JOB NO. BY CHECK SUBJECT DA' E SHEET NO. ? • • cC) r • • - - - 1 Kramer,Chin&Mayo,Inc. 5 P _ 0 0 -2 --g o Client: 130�'//*I. PARk/itlG LOT // \ . . • __- H 6 ..• { , 3(_0,, . i 4--I- a„ �, . , il - ,. .,,-- ,. . ,./.,\/.,\... , ', ..y.„,\.,- \ ' li FORKING 11, . i; 9l oil • . L/�Nf 5C4P/NG :Norr Z � - Pik.)-7-7 N0�t F"�r��-,e-;�, c2� 41'fig4)v P.Eau, .- = _ ":1. 3i_-p oi✓I .FAcr r9r/ r/.-/,1err_- ;"yr .i...: -. r 1'✓c ti , -- - : • • ,4 1-r v /.1/V L, l VA? C. $c13 �L.-A/ . ,...e.•/61g-JOB NO. BY CHECK SUBJECT DA SHEET NO. 71V, iA Jl•.N•'V. r, •ti ,.. .I•I' ... 1 •• Ir» '" ••-1-1• rr. - r••ire•' -I•• •“• 1 I. I' - —_ .w... ,+ 1� ro r./' J 1i • •L• • 1I1 i+f • �, / / ' H , 1 ...-11—•�. I, 7 I• .. 'i •J..}�+,'. .._�.��,.- _ -rA•-.+•.-.•�«;,•,+e..•.••+*',. ....r,we....-.• ....«•-r'• ,: ,'' '1 f y tH.r, , / I it e , II e I !r �I - ^ Y• I '!' �! '' •/ J I ; .1 1, r 1, l .1I • 'kl r .I•I I�' `r ,,Y' .1 , ._-IL__- _. ,• -•—! ' ,•_-�_•-__,ply•-•'I'I I /' r i. ' / ' i ii NI I, `-II nl 1 'O•• t7•l /' j' Ai, _ t` ., L_..,,_--I '--r I. _.1 I -i I� ,I y F j/�i • ,! /Y ' •U , Ir 11 =1 `, II n1 \�' \fJL_ 1 • 44.. ._JI ',y,' I / ''/ J i.__._J L.__..'J _._.__J L__,._J.T..0.l,� J' y ' I'� , I t /••- \ • 4'b I •r I 0 ,' ' ' / w•SHINGTON I ° •• •• ) 1? '4'17 --•irJ�rr ••� r-- , i, -'1 J)3 /1�I.•, 1, ,%/�" I ly .- ,'\ / y: I - • ,..,../ % ,. r1 I, II I .I---—1 l;(t--- 1 I---- 1-.- .a• i? / • \ G: •\ ,. �'•--t r, r I I e1 •r 1 I I. • z I' ., ,I .• • ,r' V/ I< r ,1 I tL _y,_ d / I ', 1., ii) 0 i. . ..• , . ,.,.II .J .. JII, ,...,..._ p I' i., / /. ,ray J. .1 I ,•:, " ••I' L ., ,,..„ . . , '•S• ^}• '•I r 1 j-- H I ,I ,1 ,/I I, �I I Ir_ • I 1 "' ,• , , / . 1 1' I,---I i---•1,--__ _I -..._I,.-•—_I --1, < I. I •/ r!r by / --•.o -• , I •_.- i i • .(./ • ,.1 l 1 1. • I I N I , I, I :I r \<1 I I , , I•I I I 11 4J< ,' ' .,, I q_ �'• \.,a«''�._•Y`a'•;� r '+ -'+.''r:. ,• 'wi _� �, „, - J _-. 44•j Y:1� o» ,^.'(4.:"_H•s1- :Io,' ,%-v.'K-4, t ,t .2"y;1P '6" r- _f••3•.. ."y, ...•...... ... e • iii rA:Oil....11111111i111111141 1.), . ;IAIe ■■i�� �011•r}!��' rfti' i!L 41f/fnliming' minim to,04...:.:•:i'e,4,'' /. :, • A • - - 1 1 . ■I1■IpiId11■N � � - I ' ••••• i ' ? �r..... errsasl��-far`w �Ir���1r�r 1111 •. ��%•�•,•,�,•�.�„ ! i YYpp r.••• •` t F I I , lii iw ` �; •1�•+1•1•••41•••�•,��I••,.,,.•' I i '1b . .\i J ' II •i \'• ,\ .■ean■mterhi �r■Nn■■u11 ■C mire■�1■Iirr ZAd�r$ iruea ■...... ... .... .. 1:• J aIA�Ji h�E:ll> I �I�il"sfa _.__ _. rl!■■■i■:n2■1■fa■S;E■91is.�::::'�rrii111 1 • n -, i \\ .; :. ' ' t `• lii■itiiwinidOw0. . w �w�MIrwI"I I■ �111 y �M • •• ' \ Ia,.. ,, r' '9m.®11riIli.7G. 11riiMil ii iI■IIIIII ►\�t1�E+•:•:•:•:: . ■■■■', ' . r-:,,f•- . • \ isms . l 11111111 ! 1 1!1_1.... 4 ..,, L. I _ _ - i 1• I�■■■r■dd■�■■■S��■r/■■■rt•■dd■ed I •►• ,Vi••••- f rr . • :�F' `a-1J '.� ' I ;yl 't i I 1�■■�■■�■�� eA:.71*1►�■1.'.Tilr!I►:r11191Si■�,/. 1 !., ''• i ::•'•i�ar, '' +_ :c,_r I Er, .' (li = . .. . , �';\: ■■■��■�■���+5'J ILIIr 1illll►lai[IrL'Glr•ri t I se\ ,. ;. ;.;•, , ;, , _ .4 f 4,414 • i■1■■�■■■��.'���rYl•I■■■■■Irr■ilr:l. 1 A >�o••!••!' e 1 , •r: d 1 r ' -�'"i' - -�' I 1E■■■■■■����■� �■■ ■�rtr■r■I/E '• .ie�•i�o �°: a :.••: ry::_rl�l �I r� ,r ' ■I�■ ■■IILII�IIIIIr-IIII_I�■■■■L�II�■�■17:I1■I■ ! e A:..��•i� ::/,•;','.:1.....'', ' '� '^ ='''-= "1 YI`-�', , ,''1 ly�NRMl•�1� iiia it! IJI� d I .i.1.. li.e•.! I" /• 1 - , • ter: 1' =1 .' `'1. ISL'1r mie�Iurar�r ®■did■mG■ ilr/i fi �,i•, a ,% ' I�1�+01111 o �i'i y1, lz +M,.i r.t,,•I • I. .,a o 11 ,r:.- .• .f <1, y�, II ■I■■■■■■w ■e■■■■�r�d�■i�ier :.y: r .._. _ J ". It I }•-.I ' a,, �, m'. rIr1e , I 'It I ' IIIIlIiI !!uIilu1A .E.' •1•j°� `� i1- 6 el _.r• '• .f—� __ _ I _ •- (, ., 1 ' ",I 1 •:•.1, iri.N'' .. �.I J I 4l,' ,•t ,, z 71 a !' A $ ,,•' 1't: , p I ■i������hi��:� ■�`.�1�d� �. ';.! ; •,•,ii4.1 • _ W: •...4 a . , z f'M' t ' Pr: \'I 1111 U�11�111111i� 1 111` \\..a:\• ; •}••, l• : 1 41�I ikf, r . itI Ii t f .,:. /_•f IJ III``i_ '''•r. V '' b ••. ';'< 1 I , • tl - •\1�.'a` :II.' `Ii' '' , ,..p. A1,- ',q' '1 tae I..r14"•> k, „titer/•i Ca „•, Ir,, •,,, 1 . 1 \ -.E ;,. -,.♦ �i wR'II:.I•rd .'', % I •Ll < u!k, `,1 _GI ,-c1 't Z, ..__.N,-- .._`.8_y,I - ?n! •--c� --Nr• - _I. • yY 9i =1 ill ``I .r,n W rdr ,4 ••.7.iI_ =+-�„ 'tr. -=f"r-7�A-�1 !,J t1 I t•. • . '\ 1 '5)\ ' 1/ 3 4., , ti:14.::''''Ct I, - '/I •::•,' • ,,,d :it,;" :..I.-.1...L.-1.A;.4,. '.•„'!,.,-.: .‘'''.1 li_.??.. ' ':. .....•:''i . :• E :':' ii a. t1/`/ '';/ _ .e,r.y _ �! 3. ._��_ '.,,� i :• i .,tIG._ -t I�� i,1 .. I� -r- ,I`J ,V' •Jfr, �IY.:::'`.1.-7, '- -'JI •• 1 • r 7. I' 1 • i /' 1 i.,1 +— +f'' a✓-r,- �' r "��L - "L d1 Z' -'IJ•' rdc. -` �,'� 11 11 I ! '�?, J I' s}. *i_i .J I r. `7, /_� ' -_i I r ,3•` ' 1 11 ' 6171010J l I. f p 40,.•I w„l) Y •1AI !1 •' :L.J !r I: I '1 ^,r) •.1.• \: •• ,,. I :,,L! . •,.11�•I:A t4.*:• ,• 1, • ••• 11• • •,r.` 'r „i 1 J p, • .I. , c. • ^/.•,� . . ._ _ ` � . ._.L... _ . _ .. r�ttl. 1/ '` • .. ,1} ,,\ It•1 1 • • - ra / P. �4, 1 .11 :•' ;n` • H., • 4\-4- ai: • r l,••II I !## KII.'31.I.., ,,-„ ,fiT N �,/ I yam'•A Fir4PANI ` I •'I. _ I_>3 ^ .•' /, 1 • .11 I• M1,�J! & 'I ,1�4 no M '•'Tow .. • �j f o �.... . i ; -z 'I I „' -, ,�•a _ _�•k // /' tt I • - '\ ,' r' '/1■i, '• �I,.� •I• re Il!�Z�'•'� .•''1 I .,J .r. ,� - n•=, --I .�—•_ —_, I 1 ...,,,'. • G '..1,1R101;. mr_.-, . ______:,. .. ...- -'-''. -. —... . luk Al I_. ..ifir,r4,0 :.:\:,FrArio,..,1 t,. . 16-T..- , '..'!' el I t �. t\ :J ]j .I—a� • �AN' ah , IB 1 ..� • .• Q , t 7'....-_"._ '-r!- 1 J /J�1�� • • \1 r^t '\ • �' •• - -`V I'1,i�A1.11, I��i��Aici r w .1 • , ",,. Nr i-.. f I 1=.,r I- ;Y 0 • • .,• '\ \ \ • . ` 41P, i•1■-o•`• 1\• _).a V ,i ��I4I® t} i,,• , .•+, 4_ ..A '_, , )� L__�r-. 'f� t R T,.,•r'I \ Cr •-:\ • i`•' %I �i■B1■I►�5 °! r► r �►,�f, e� ;+:. i. • �. ,, r , 1 i ,; :-T"_I_�i"_i-— • rv'+'. 1 1 — �'1 "I ,._i• s \ .o''•\ rr■■■■111Z I �,�4i t '.M 'rzx5o0„ µ... t• 18 f), ;'— PI .•+. .\ . 1\:Y.... i. / �11' F 'f�••••., .rh-`r-.1.,. , •.. / ISMI1' •• - -� —P.•-7- r.l .. '+ • .MJ— v..•—tu..tu. o I arl�Y.• \ , F` _ , N" + rl l~- J' , '..•T1ir'i' �,:,7` .a rrc M. ,`" ..•` . "✓` �'..-.'J ?,421 .. �_.•:..: .„, a:�I' . Ir'n•, •�.; .\-• , .. .I \ �r �•," w r - 1 / <: n d'+` it 1 •r,� ® y ...I .w r 1,....„...., ,... ---DTI-J '-_ '• • • ..-o•. •\ 4Y.. , r ,•r;• y' 'r lam'• ' ;I'..� �� • •..+. • 1 i,+_r• , u , r� ---:v�'y' -',. iJ!...i ! +R \. , ', - • • r., , _ ^ --'�•' .w.,. ' • r < -r. 'I r /, '1 ' —'u-• J» .......... • -' • rI_"T'• .•. .r•L,, 1 ,�— .n•r+/r,rc.hrrf-RT..r•• • CON, CR.I.LIq'I, ,V,:: AVC. '\ _ 1 1 1I i .. •, f r: ! ,W ��- i•, �':, K. ,�.'p ',n • c. a+ --�- •+ -__•_ _ r .• l•IL • • °r • Ii '• � ,. � .. •�• -, •T • tiI . , L am___...I.—_• _I ..1 I � _ ROC G3 • . \t.;1 � ' :: . r - . '•" .• • F't•, �' • n. . • • 'I r �,.- 7r I� yfi q u •I,•i • r, �u .,, • r . „7r '- - - y • d�I a • i...r,-"C fa.1 77. • • 17 — .. ` ' • !,r ,vol. • �� -�,� 1.r..w . . . : , • ` i s �- - . . t l ;- �— j ,..A � I. . . �/ ,l- a of:• ___ti ,.,, L-- - _: , •:_ ' _:_ ••':. • • • ■����■ � - ; _ n p // 1! 6/N41. rA CI 1 1..Y /2g 6. /7/ .' .1. .. ''''' r• - •...: ''. '• ....:%A.C. :.. ...• ./..i/%.'/:Y.:.. . .s•• (-3'' :• . ..":'-';...'...-1 • • :,, • . :•• • ,, .I •s/ �. ' • •� y l� Ye t •�• • i . '\ F • ` 1►4:e•� r '::p) a•• t'-.'' 1, 4 • ia I�• ',`�Y• •'il• ;.:/- A... ,•IY,'/..4 C. +,f: �. :j', 7 i r�'7 �'j�rr+,1 ru.y�.,r, -1 1 !lLY •1.is v, .. I e•• YddSN S•F :l_ a 9c• r0• i c \ •' ' '••~ '•' <�\.' r ..! • i ♦-••4•04%- ~ 'i , ..1,' •-,,-i--•'••••Ir l'"}: h r • '•Ft 'S• R ..io• +? ,//v•• / r L� ` .,•�,Lr4•r 4 lUi4 -•`^ -.,.I• •• ''v .;• .'CO . . . ;,•. �, r• Q cYr,' 1 '' - f . + f\ `I\ ,10e ' �/]jr�{ /J!� S� T Y ....-•ram •.1 •,Irrn1,, r'. ,•• ,..' • 1_\s ; e0-r r'• .L._ I • ''• �,',` pUf.3LIG Op /-1 /IGV • ,.. . \_sT '?•"� --( 1...,.r1—�'' • cb�• /::1 I, 14. \C` �11%. li 1 i' .•I 1 �7 � / a -,�-•^ I•T' L.,1!�,�-��`• oti •® ,,,,,,• r t.e'r {{ • (,P(� �'. W-III .Y; • :y� • �' �` 1 • I•. I 'r., • ." -_-_ - - -___- _ ___ ___,_ - - -` ,__17 c•� I••,7. .... ',„..., yrf9 . ,.R,,, •... i. «r 1 I J • • • -I .•t. T. - •'.,. li ' , '. -'te•�1. _'}1y' .Lr�I7. . .,ram' '�•¢`, '� .'j •` ` ',\\•R, �' '\.I`.�,r+;" I• -------- ' • • • ' SICU 2. V G/fITY L11l WUE r - • THIS DRAWINGREDUCED TO• ., . � ,_- ,��;- _.,-- � -_-;---:R----z-- , .� �' • ':,L�,.,I•'�: • r f ' • ,-�. �' T11 � �: __w r v:;• ONE-T ' f _• 1. I '�' ?�-..„ r` '..:.. .. .. "-, ,• ..• •"HIRD SIZE . '' "' rI 1R =i• .•T •�' 'r ' h=�. :�'4 J,%,•,� -! , • J. , 'I:III-Ir-I11444:21- 5•Ir-It'/I--IIP-1!1•4• II.ITMIII,I1112,15-41•1°11W-'nr'reFaII'!-IFIIIT•!:•-...541141t4VS!!!•?•• •••• :4.9,..7"./II.LIIIt44,3, -iI44-:-Z412. IIIII.._"IttI'f-*.IIIINY•••f•fIlIIIIIII!,:''I ...CItI2I'irIII44II°1:':-7.4sie..IIIIIIIZIF IIf.-II4I.K.CII/II-IIJI[II:F;:;',II';:II4t:'?.144:••*it;4•`FII'SI-IIIfi.49.e52..•'F/Ir:tIII•IrIi7'-'4;;;I'*IIIIL:44:(S`I?•.-Ist.4.i•-•II-.411.7IIIII'2:Ie:;44;71K.Y.I..47II:72.7tI.*ir.1.:.,17.--,'";;I:I:::'^:I_;.•'''4Ii'IIiii;'...It' 4•Ii'ItII'I'I;I'I•3''StIZ;5.:;-411%*.:-.?!.''''t!t..-PkIiItIi?e,I.**:allteit......141rIMI":15"..-.....92ii30,••••":501,4009II. 4 .. 4 _ . t.... ,•:!% ' - CrOV;-ClIf OP , r•-• <<i) VI......., Z..1. \ •t°,.., H • I • I • ; . , • i ; • 1 :•'1 ,•••4 11 44 z 0,‘ co' S '..44. 0 .. , I . K, cA \ ......_._1' I . AinTMEW ,...T C*.NsN ...'s I,2 'i4, 14 , I4Is • ' ,i .'..2., ‘: --,,, . , 1 ,1 t 0 , ;-..t „,• t . • ! ,,. ,-, ;,,,.' ..'.:\\, __._ _ • .,..._ _ _ _________ , .,, '; ........ • . I ci 1 I i: . . .4/ /I•4 t N. - . 1.1 ,t:I iN.),, •.,.. # „S r, P r ! I . I ; 'k\ I 41 •1 1 I sz 1 J III Oi I ! • , °,1 P • , ,.. `:. , 1 . . . . 1 1 _ • . i . ( , I. ., ; 1 ,' ' — -'' -- --''.....:=•-; -,he -L.t :,', 4-:-.. --, :.,. ' • .- . -- 0,.. .--_A.- --., Ai'-'•---/'-4. ..-•--,' 1.-•.-;---,. -z.atl..firkkSt*t2V.!!:,it!tAt.iti&'::• lez...k,:›t:,,,4%--!i.,1:4.-,11.211t,•1' - . .r.,se....-. -_,:o..k.,-.;Zr''nrtl.rk...:•,--.....-;t:A.,a1Z`41,`- ilhi../.' l';...././.Z../__AroiLil---...-.'•,-...t In '- .....u. 1.::'a,/,‘,4".L5'-..1/ ...e-.1C.,2••• •,....,..- .. 'Z'....:._'.4t,. .- - • .'. ~' 'r_� ;'.. ...11 ! . .: 1 1 .1 .I� M, '2 � � i11 4. :�.-•/, -.-tea I .__--, JJJ V 7 1 . yi ; L a • `, a ,. J, 1. .I 1, I :., .1, . r j 1 . • -. ,, •.... ' ,;r.,. ;, _�;__�, ;=; ; ti .1 51980 ITEM NO. 11 `t . _fJC_ '' • JAN1 /�; �j� I Garr."'+:I I ' ' WAaNIN670N ,1. e.0 M ' '' �' I. ;:, .;.y, -' ,vu t-.,.1 T----,1 , - ":1 --< - 1 r - . • llil2il i2�314�5�6 ` . ',• •t/ t�"--'I,_.__ i ,_--_.,I._._ ,-I •I 1 ' • :/ -,I� t' 2 I. .I Q 1 J a 1X - • 0 / ,e. 88 • / •.(••r • :.111 , C, ,, .,1 ', Ii „1;::,I1 \/a 1I „I I} 1' I -• • / . /:e r' I .. �✓ 1" ,.1�_ --- INF a MIN EN 1111■I®1I■■�� . •. .••••►•.•• •.••.1•VI••• I < 11 1 • ,. ... II I. en PI ,/JIIt1■III.■mememIn - = I, . CAI VI I.■I■■a■■r_EEL ,❖,•,•,,,,V. •.••, 1 ■' I I..:.w��^,...�___..___-� ' ■■ I■■I■Pl■■EIt•F® ••• •...... I` dal ■i at I■■I■�1■t��,G� ;%•; .!%%r;:i - `.' If v'I I 4 O 1 UK X2 ME I.ti1■!11■■®tires■ •...•,.•..tr••. ._ •C 1 11ii Er'I1■ !■1111411■A>•■!t3�I �. , !! ■i i 1■■m IFi■R�NI C� 'I , • Mil IN►JIATSIYNN=•mr,f�mmummmnow= UI I Cr 1.IIII1al■■1•limJr■■ i■■fi,■iI ,`]: I. ■i ME t i- 1■r■Iil■Wr■\ArrI1115 •■■■■■I " , C■■ 1i A q■■I■111■'IP91t�rrl:�asr!■■■■!1 1. . I s j I ig air IN l■nvl1■I,NEREEEEMIS■■■®■■■■1 , , _- I• + , .I 111111fI i�11111111s1 i , . . ' IU■■R■■11011Ze!• ..I.. l�xS03f21711M�fa111111�■p■■■1®��I■f1�■I�1E1NA■ISIY■PP IA1 1,:_,,,........ _' -_ r _..1---....___-J". {» 1 •-aME=:: - NM NM - -mac-- I ■■■■ ®. - ' i „I.'"„�• r;•_4 �i,.... '� rI 1 .. ,i soil �` im Imm ■.E I~ . L/1.11011 ME , C rlv glik 1 ��ma inuim 40 ; ''-•'� \ , , ' ,. ,- . ' „ ' ,'r f°; I_ '., i No, evo : , -. • -•I' �i 1 • IL I_ fi , ;r,il ^', .f j • PrOrg a..1„- �J•i' pl.) I -,�ip' " _ 11 r',. ;J r J •I Ur, J J ; Jr 1 1 IIi i 11�tj ;�� A 1-IL- -. ram^ I /' "' %I. r��" e1 I. _ r!'' :Jea 1 , -`r• _ . IF 111\' I1 1 -. I, '•.�_� _. - '�. . po. • < '1�i��I ,a _e - r,1 .y ti•J - •L+-'_-) W1 -•L- 'SIT.10 r F •,. 1 tl .. 1 -`.'- � I� _, t,. . : ,,, ..., a IFF`, ,rla,,- ,, ,t� �.■■r■r - -..C_ ,. .. ' It r , » .r' .. .r.L- 'LI-..,.._1 .7 1 r -a...u-_•1• �'_. 1 I ''-I ■_ J_■ MIL r ■■ _ t• _ IN■■NEIN I.��NI■ -, _ _ i...■i I _r" '1 - II_ _Y��, 't,._.!� _ fra t r t �C.■■■■■■.o• . ._ • • 1111• / 11 yY ••�- - nl _ • I /14,4,:. i " /U n7, ='Ja 0 .,rl7: ; ••'(% 11 1 1 1/ , !. / Afiler.-. �" J. • ,a (. II ,.I , '•,, p?,, I t/?' .' ' 4. •-e, I • r 6�Rn/�n , 40, I ,�� _, ,- ; 1, , , -� -1Q r• u I �, I- a. �, II! 1 • ' � ',. a Il f' • ,. • t 11 � - - - ♦'�. • •�y�a- _. -!. y -_ .+'iN 'rl Ys T`' .1 ._..r .. .. .J . . - r .. r• \ t' 1 1 - - _- p .w /P.n Q /• 1•. I,N , • '-�• , ••- •' ' N: �' j�T_ a.T,.1 i L L ....._i r �rL._.__r a•.�,_• •4, '-'.>•, Il' . GKRI';LJ6t •il . .. �,''12V.• ` 'r'I ''-' I' '�':YI''"•1•.3 '• �. ....J,. ,+ M .1 �N'»4 • NS lei r ► .ir'.9 .�, 7 .. .� - .: „... ,. .'. .. -l7j-' , • 1 air ' . E i%,�2 :. --- - 1 • 1• • 1 ! 1. ,. „•, r n a •, ', I -i-.. �'4. nQ p�yR� / e in: 1, - /o. yaNiy JsIQ®■ - N, I®.it1 i : . -- , • __ • • 17 . .. . •'&41,2plor„ ••..- ;,.....:, . ' .• •0. of 1 .. . - . '• I , i" \ \ ,•./111111tile ..; , r, Y .▪ .. . , �il�ilifi6 ��, mac' ■■�■��■ v;*► . .IP,�II. EON <1 • _.` • •`•- •1, 1 \ `to:\ • .\ 1/'. ^ I■■tIIi31iII f1 E , C .. ..• •r,.., :•, I I_.. . ,A! r-�-w . • I • • 1 • 14 •,\ -V /■■E■■■I.. 1. 41910. � J , , 1 1.r •,' '•i 1• •.•, , •� A � a ^,•%.'t� • \ • 'imnniII '_ • - •� TBOO_. ... N. ...�I ..8........ f. •• ` ,- \. $ ' / Q ,i■mgmr`Ism ,F. Ai r •. F'•..,'+ j 0 " 1• --,r,= ,..-x _ - 1»f.,o i • _-•- I. \ . .k ,0 . �, _ ;; • "•t. '1...,; .•"..]'-'" ,....•• I�I -I. . ... ♦.N ,,r ; �.. �'r�,-' ,i 1 • • ••'!P • •\ I. '• r •. r •{ -; •' •/••�T '' ..'���,r_. 31.7 + ..'��� �•�-" ' . ^� . pr --r•,1.1 JI B--r • quay_ ' '� ; \ • •, , , 1`1 ••.L:7 ^I; r••..i r r"' .. • ;-n, rl pr 1 I i w+ L I�C___ r.w•./w..a m COMM ,I t;IAL '�! •1' •1 , -•I •1• M,Y, \. ,(\ • t • „ ,, 2.,��ma ' 7 • I'•' ..tom. '♦' • 1. 01.. ..0 •1 .r .M n.. _.4. .. 4.iro, t AVt:. N ,rr• .. , . - •✓..-.� 'i' •„\. Y'• NW „ iY ''' • 1 ••I ! L�"•'�'-- • a• .1 611 M� n N ., r YMIA'.•,. •1 ^Mi�`t••rM�'` . . \1 _ -,••�.,••x' .`t N. �y -• ••.r2VOr.r ]7. •r. �'' F, WA 1 .M • ' "._.. .• Y III •lf1►►``,, ,' I mil' V4 r'• .\ I• .1, ,'t _, . . ,r! - -1, • . :- ___'--_ .` =ars.oc rGwra:1,!M:+.uccwa,�,oa7r:ow=alayaam��,' : ..,� L�, �F":«:13{� ..",�'..�. ;' -r c t•.., G VES lillE is 'u •N'�'" y '1'' 4 ._ _ ' • 1. \. 1 7'� i�, •. \�-• - 1 '_•i r 1 .r•. r P.®NNE i•:,. r• rr•n..,. •r. r. t C • �i.jor 1 y `. � • or+• \ Z / _ • �• ,• �• T]• <, ,�Eir s .•-1 �.1.• ' 1 n•• 'yam r i�--_r-• -7^ tii•,• , -•..{.r. _Y.�.y! •..1.� s4.../'•�Y:..n �f 'I\ } �''),.a.' '. ,...• .. ....... ei • 1 .r 'i -'f�i`-I-�' - ��-,a _ �- �r1•..v "W AF• �- •,,,. • ? Ti: .1 /.. , .. t1 .•••• 1. I '."...1 1t - '.�Y y • . r`- _,7jµ....... ._.. - '1 ! • ..•.0 r1•.O1►A � `-+__.,' '' . w :•4 \ 'I" . ..•1'. 1,.. '.:" _ 1"l_1 7.15 ini7u5T��A.- LI- ..., 1. - :- T:T �'. ,� 4. I ,11 ■lei " .r _awl, < �l .'� - • ' CI vt-ri - rAtilLY gE6. Piiiiiiii:iti4. , t.4_1____• ;,• • . . , •:'i..i.f.oig- 1 - . .. ••,,,„ ., 47, c•e• s.; - r 17,--1 -' - - •-•-. . - .. •••••• ... -wer ' i ". kik -- , •? Il'�. .uAT__ •'ii;•-• ,.-1 n -••.� •• •. •4`:rq c;R� '.- t i �f1\,, �+I e ti.'t o•'li: :R ''-�.',.'▪'.,7 , \` <� a ice, �,'' ,rJ .CI ;•y •. I1. 1 7 - 4r. .�.•..;=- •orf.;,• :�',,.• $1 . ♦O,' •- •4' 1 ,. .' ' •.� � i. n .J --w. - 1-_ - •. -ii•i • .. - 1. • a I• '•• • J •. L `..• O '\' " • • iiI r C ,_ „r• • �. ` A. �, rL � r I • . .4 ,„i„,,±_•L...1..": -.'" : • • TO 1 Y. ff l-.ram ,,...���yy , -1 ^I;�, r1 . ,. THIS DRAWING REDUCED '�' �i ' ,�• P ., `�'r n�.1-I..�� r,„,,A, .•�2......., '� j:'T'';:` F ''1=�-'-+`���'` :; - 'o ' " `\ :"di r , ' . .. I I MAPS i BEGINNING OF FILE FILE TITLE y C C IAL P R i I S ' - O. 150 FOR Z15 ALL- DAY PARKING SPACES IN ionic del 1�NY ' OG/iN AV - • N b#t n . N.. AND N • Co ?- 5 I T5 ADDENDA I. APPLICATION ITEM 5: LEGAL DESCRIPTION THAT PORTION OF THE BURLINGTON-NORTHERN, INC. (FORMERLY NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY) 100-FOOT RAILWAY RIGHT-OF- WAY IN SECTIONS 7 AND 8, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., LYING BETWEEN THE NORTH MARGIN OF NORTH 4TH STREET AND THE SOUTH MARGIN OF NORTH 6TH STREET IN THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF LYING WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY OF NORTH 4TH STREET DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: : COMMENCING AT THE CENTERLINE INTERSECTION OF NORTH 4TH STREET AND WILLIAMS AVENUE NORTH WHENCE THE CENTERLINE INTERSECTION OF NORTH 4TH STREET AND PARK AVENUE NORTH BEARS S89°00'09"E; THENCE N89°00'09"W ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF NORTH 4TH STREET 284.14 FEET TO A POINT FROM WHENCE THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID.. SECTION 7 BEARS Sl°06'06"W 12.43 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING N89°00'09"W ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF NORTH 4TH STREET 67.71 FEET TO THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID RAILWAY.AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGIN- NING. . THENCE CONTINUING N89°00'09"W ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF NORTH 4TH STREET EXTENDED 104.20 FEET TO THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID RAILWAY; THENCE N17°19'18"E ALONG SAID WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE 73.00 FEET; THENCE S70°33'09"E 100.07 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID RAILWAY WHICH LIES N17°19'18"E 40.00 FEET FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE S17°19'18"W 40.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; . CONTAINING 2.82 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. . Please see the drawings on separate sheets for boundaries. I I li/.�. .>. 7f 17 V 37 /LA .i-i/-fn Al '? - f%-/n . ADDENDA 1. APPLICATION ITEM 5 (CONTINUED) The site will include the property as described above and portions of the abutting street rights-of-way. An application to use the ROW's for landscaping, sidewalk, and parking use has been submitted to the Renton Board of Public Works. It is under review and approval is pending. Depending on the action of the Board of Public Works, the final dimensions of the site may vary. But the dimensions of the site will approximate those given in the conceptual plan (see Figure 1 and larger-scale drawing on separate sheet), which are approximately 1,230 feet long by 135 feet wide. These are the average dimensions. The width is the critical factor in this variance application. The length plays a less major role. The width of the north half of the site is 123 feet at its narrowest point, which is the narrowest part of the site. The average width of the narrow half is 125 feet. The width of the south half of the site is 155 feet at its widest point (more or less), which is the widest part of the site. The average width of the south half is 135 feet. • • `EDGE GE EING LOGAN AVE.N. /AAINTEO EDGE(6AIJTnNG) lLncnrt W.f. 1 '.l Figure 1 : Conceptual Plan Tu . Y 1 I —I • tr • '\�` ` ` _ PLANEoNG JIRIP . / //- ��_- tlNRNEJJ AVE.N. _ f/ J `\� 1_ _ MIA.. Y l/Il/ I I / 1 ��1� —_ tOGAN EVE N. _`(p1}y - jrzTMOv ,.vtARGEm¢Nr i •l r-�1 I I 1 1 e� '��' ----1--------____ rote a�m.a J I l lll� 1 f 11 _--- ---------- P-Egie EOGE(ELJTIM) / i L y�,y y y {' j 7�/j 1l�Cr.,,,,I/III,471 I i, I ICI �'. 7j///�///�/�� / / //� �r-- _�--- 1 • ZEE T..5.45•ENE OF LCVV AC, �- ' ' I I I !--1 i I I ' 1l f.i.i 1_ I JI I LI_I I I I III L.L�LI1I 11.I 1 I.1_1 I11�. rl 1-Ill 1 II' I.I.j!l. l_I_�11_1 T..J AREA ti LOGLY Eve.N - /[P'l LY C6{. tlnpuER AIE.N. ---_—PAINTED 6C.GE(EtnsriNO) I \ �`_ 3 or PIE.,,,,,Era,. _un uQ1.1�j i • .eL.. THIS DRAWING HAS BEEN REDUCED i hhly^.n 4- • -EDGE VCa•C SL1RNErr AVE.N _ W Win- OI...nK3411' Q LAO m.o.. • •'� --•—.�-� 0 ADYDPN.MR •'C-II.-.Ir1 �'...n M. �r.0 —'I H.�.�1+ I...a I, m. ow --— •IIIIUTON.MR _ I _ MILS! DE/.PO mr BOEING RENiON PAWLWG Lor N II �- 0 ..J. i ,. w... ..r.-x s r" .. rh.y.- _.'',z1r.',I. s• -,c „ `x. . Sstiu •st. .-e; '}.`. s + . .re,. a,.> ,❑f X �s 3 n, >.� r 3 5.. .,.• �, r�'-i :.{-.�'t- '�'J.-. { ..,�'•�.-.�,`"�,,' �'^�•'1. �y` .,�s• 'ei*'� -s. 1a. , ,._,. Sri.u:� �'f•�c.'S+- �.. !. .,F�,4_"'..� c.b=.... t�- �:.�Sa» i..t.�k au .,..':L^..._.`�.l.Y.. ....t _ _ _,f....- .z.zo..... ., yes...Y . a tint., t `}-„,- .... s......_ -a 4^�.tz .AFC. �` _ :.s..5 ,+...ri..._ts,.,...a�.._�., kr .., r. t: I. • e' 1,� ',l _ is t"; I. . r f, I,:=i; _I;;-4* (I,'' -, , :I'a;j'' .. ` -_=1 =.i•27p.. Y 1-- I I -- -- _ �' xl~' %i'•'li. - 1 ,. ., ]. n. �: '�I I, I ''1 j -1.1k\[• 11J I `__€_ !. f✓h 1 is'�t. \\'.`.a I ' - ry - -t� V i, , i I'I :I: (sty Jt :'IIT •IF,? I Cis �. 1 i ' rr_ I[ i I ~ !t_- �I .� —I— —L,_J. �.Lt.. -71'115 i I.:'? ^.....!Iz.:Ic -I: _/1•:r: •`I: _ I: .�.. • :,LYIL 'I���.L.�.:��1,-�._�.r_ �1=1:`[Z�1.L€:�,�i_._�7:5�..�, .. �,:[_ C:LT,.�I��_I�LLI:�����- ': .... ................ 1. • 'j' § _ � I .. 3 -'y .\'--_,_ 'I' �I' '•I'`-_i �. r. 1• i� - ice,., .. • 1 1. _ i. YI ^! I. I `� i-t[�•= ;•I\ '11Ir Jr, 1 Te l`: i x -'\•�` I:)"•t ,�t -I. \ •1 I L._ ..- -_ 'E'•::.:;5'.• . (ol � ^ _ _ _ T-� l-�`� I-�� �-r I VI r� I I� I�!�'`�= `•�`• I.I� Li I_t�l�•'� `I-�i`�j 1j, •'''. �:r:•. 4 i \ �.i � r;. • I' - ''i }ai cl. . '1 'i' .1ItlxelltIll1/ II• ..;a.�_,._,,!' .�.;. L..:.Ir i 1. ..•.. . . . ••� i.. - :1;',1t_kill; -1� .0 IJ,:L:ilr : ,j I!IN[ I_= _ :' _ is • I 'J 1 L: : �- ..��` � . : `t z .I X � r`. _ • It • , 'tie ;. .,� • •�I•ffrkb r '�I: % `t • •:i:- 1 , ,T l•I' 1 •l_ _�._ t c . -4' ,' ;a � l' r • �: :I I � - - - ' ._.I j L •• t ...,,,•;.-• .r 8 1�T I- f', I'r�t': - .r'' ,<.i 9r' �, i ,I •,\ t ♦ a_ S v tip' 'If' Z 1 `I' 1 1 i °.�' �♦ h�._ •Cat f� 5,5 a'� fir: `//} ✓ FI: ;i• .. t \1.1_.({ 1` t 7 rt." r:., I:•.I \ �... - <t '.�-� 3'.,:+'v. r�. ♦. - .:- '=---i-to vY�.•- . y .. :.1-L__ �' I.:�_.Ix' L,..•`''.''''';. 4\'1-1I' i '2'' f ,•ii i:I* •'.•e�� •:1� I.•,e `\•:•le • t R-���►�.iE® ,I..'A''i'1`r� •1?• ,, �.1•• ,{`p�` i i jl •:SM: N.$: ;!.:*` Ko.k.. t hS q1;_ . yrr` i --1'tit.•.,).1 Wit• -._,,,- -v,'\: (�.f 1' I6, .• •.■� -I `7 \�aw�1�.•, i �..`�,. ..t2•' • �F °• off • l0 .y iaa ■��■■le O: , ." b. �r��9L•i.`�A - I. -•.I =N I I:• r �� �l�::: _ .�� .. tip ; '1 S_ '�I•a • `e� i.f ..�� • ��t .�,_ ~• .•.4.' r'-f�-,' • • Ie' Imo, -I-�-•^ - 14 \. •-N ,4 I v.: - .C7 Er, iJ:J I_ I:,:I_ JI ! ' \ ,5,,, illiii MIMI— -. :i ....._. 1 _' J."' ; ' � AP _ :�I .fir, i [I: -I-�-r'7=1: j OPgraiit6r ■'iof-iis - -.- \'_ .. -,� �� .`, �� \> i' i. j iF if �.:, •t�- (+t_ —° -L- -t"_,: _-1.�-,1- --.I OEart'e� ■ ORMII .w ■.uee■■m■r�ee� .�,,� - --- �Z/ �g { .I:' ..;--^�-••- - '- 1 _'r,�-,• -- p T OM !saMI �i■! O• ■.�r�.0l1.F.�■9� ��. _ `' / '.f r .,.r-.-'--,.--...._, r _ 1 ICI_;' "' ; I I l 1 & i 1�■� wawa • ■1ri11�0 • li �. ; .‘ ..1600 1 , >/ ; •it • -, ]_i,LI i- I I `�..H ...i■ ■1a7�\Ei■\nocsiu� •• I 4,'. ) r • : ` ', S•a�5- d-1: '•._•.1 .v: -I.I__L-1,. .•_ 'rJ► A:_..■�1a1'Z'e ■rc moL1U..\.MI.@� _I •;a . n .- - �70) %-- -i' .,y__.-__•_-i._r_:__.-•�_._ r.-- Wjj ; l I I'i a �6J I, ;i �-�� i ua� • ■� �iiisiin� \: ���'^�� ���.._ ;- _: — 'Mtl — s �� '1 .I-. I :?.i ll 1• 1el✓aistomaO..i.1 �l..�..i...Fal=. I I - I _�;• _ _::'i:;::T— FF:1-�Wl -J,9 •-� "" I _1. I Y`I y�a. I i■lseisil_L■im t - Ne'��fii■iilwr.�r, • .. 11�.= -. w , : _ a • i z1 h 1� i I.; . ;:; .ii `3 ..cr.-_" rr-c �' v,_,- - :S'E�a17 1ENIEMslsa�" ■■�I�i■iliwi■r�■N1�e� 'i' S . _ _ -;t _ i.' �.�',� `:•'1 I .. J:;� 1 -=1-a,..,. :sty 1 -I It I• �riiiiea�in�i■ .�.c��■e■euura■si■ . NM I itp, • — _ "' i ,i ?. 1 ��■m■s■m■l..F sa.� �►�x�.�I •✓t. . t -,;;5 ...-.a!,,'It;'.rII-L v+tit ''I;s L-.. '- r'..i -3 JJ .-1 :-I-.,-T ,-._1:-�;; .-;y:Tsai !!i.lSJeMR `.L_�.�..il....r eedr�■�• R I j ("I, ' �, i6 ■1■■ \ ' . o aji'19 '_ I .1�it rl! w� : ■ere....i/.ic�{"J �' .��: 1� 1 ■■u F- ._I .I I 1 I i I I ■ C=�!. r�■P6,31d W• ��; ^0 _ ■■■■ \ 1'114_ +__I._ -I_1,I I I Mi��g i4t� emor,m�gCeieiiw ■eitlii•sui. i ,�� ''li ■■1■ o n ,1, --r•i�=-r-1 f-r--, -1- - . I !1 — '� 'r�iFrnti\Ura �!■q�'\ I - f/® ,, r :I , �I 1 I\I..�iF'AL.S� ■fir ■il..■■� _. , ;J' - it DI ®caliFa�..� : li.�..IN..eu..nw __ -.,I - - i I , Yi�iit.!eal.ir.M r..�.ec..e.u.� .....■.� .,-1=' e :L; IBiiYs.'i . .r. ■..Fi■■.■� ���'' - - - k, i.�`VY'largalimo a i \ -1:� -, _I. rail■��F�- ..- -" • _ W-,,. pwm' • J -_,_ I 111 Mc I•! 2 it - . ' ' + 1• �J V. ' € .t. 'I ....... v .,• r•,:r;"'::,-�...-_•.,..� •...,, ., ... :': t rR,.....t x.:' ". db:}.:.`t>.:x s,:,,.,.tt-..,..a,et. tag+. .. -3fr ,s=,.i.5,*:kae. 3i1-r2Ze.>SC5?',.t*.'"ti'.4 :".r'�-.fr�;0ae.�C,i;*.:r�:..4s•.154i.F`)::f`3•.t'7.;rAY'Fc.,X..• " 'G•'xwr, ,••:"•x{ , ... az.a...,,. a,,,t..9�i rh 4 w i ,a"L„ �,... t .. ,4,;"' ADDENDA 2. APPLICATION ITEM 7: ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS OVERRESTRICT DEVELOPMENT The site (including the property and abutting street rights-of-way) can be redevel- oped within the requirements of the ordinance. But development as per code will • reduce the number of parking spaces that presently exist on the site, which would be a hardship in view of the expense of redeveloping the site. Existing Conditions: The property is presently a parking lot for Boeing employees. It has 270 desig- nated parking stalls. The abutting street rights-of-way have room for 80 parking spaces. Of the combined 350-parking-space capacity, Boeing employees currently use approximately 200 spaces for all-day parking on any given working day. The east right- of-way of Burnett Avenue North, as well as the parking strips of nearby residential streets, is also used for parking by a number of Boeing employees. It is felt by Boeing Facilities Department staff that a number of Boeing employees working in the south part of the Renton Complex use other Boeing parking areas, but would prefer using the parking facility on this site because of its proximity to their working places. These employees may be discouraged from parking on this site because of its present condition of disrepair and unattractiveness. In order to provide better parking facilities for these employees, as well as for those employees using the site, the east right-of-way of Burnett Avenue North, and parking strips of nearby residential streets, Boeing plans to renovate the parking facilities on the site. Summary of Proposed Conceptual Development Plan: In order to preserve the existing parking opportunity on the site and on Burnett Avenue North, the conceptual plan for redeveloping the site provides for a maximum of 400 parking spaces, which is an increase of 14% over the existing capacity on the site, ADD END A • 2. APPLICATION ITEM 7 (CONTINUED) as well as perimeter and internal landscaping and a sidewalk (see Figure 1). The actual number of spaces may be reduced by 20 to 30 to make more room for landscaping, leaving a net incease of 20 to 30 spaces, or 6% to 9%. The moderate expansion in the number of parking spaces is meant to reduce the potential for congestion in the new parking facility, which will be accommodating those employees currently parking off- site. It is not meant to encourage the greater use of private transportation by Boeing employees. Ordinance Requirements Preclude Implementation of Project Conceptual Development Plan: Other conceptual plans for the site have been considered but do not approach the proposed conceptual plan's balance of public and private interests. The proposed conceptual plan, however, cannot be implemented within the requirements of Sections 4-2206(1,A) and 4-2206(1,C,6) (20-foot stall lengths and 24- foot aisle widths). Renovation of the existing parking facilities as per code would result in fewer parking spaces because of the narrowness of the site width. The conceptual plan shows an average 125-foot width in the north half of the site with its narrowest part at 123 feet. The south half of the site averages 135 feet. Good design for the site must be based on these minimum and average dimensions. Incorporated into the conceptual development plan are perimeter landscaping strips on the east and west sides of the site, comprising a minimum of 10 feet of the width. The proposed sidewalk on the west side of the site will take up another 5 feet of the width. This leaves an average width usable for parking of 110 feet in the north half of one site, and 120 feet in the south half of the site. The minimum usable width is 108 feet at the narrowest part of the site, which is at its north end. ADDENDA 2. APPLICATION ITEM 7 (CONTINUED) Table 1 shows alternate width dimensions for four rows of parking. With the variance, the proposed conceptual plan can accommodate four rows of 90° parking in the south half of the site, and one row of 90°parking and three rows of 45° parking in the north half. The maximum possible number of stalls (excluding landscaping) is 400. Without the variances the site would require 45° parking in the north half of the site, and 60° parking in the south half (60° parking may still require a variance on parking aisle width). Without the variances the maximum number of stalls would be approximately 370. This figure may be reduced by 18 to 27 spaces to make more room for landscaping (perimeter wheelstop areas of 90° stalls will be landscaped). The final capacity of a code parking lot would be about the same or less than the existing capacity of the site (350 spaces). This would not provide the margin of extra parking spaces that would reduce the potential for congestion in the redeveloped parting facility. Any other combination of code parking would result in a significant reduction of parking spaces (e.g., two rows of parallel parking with two rows of 90° parking, or, three rows of 60° or 90° parking). The reduction or insignificant change in the number of parking spaces may require a reassessment of the feasiblity of improving the present parking facilities. The site is so long (approximately 1,230 feet) in relation to its width (approxi- mately 130 feet), that nonlinear layouts, as opposed to the linear layout of the concep- tual plan, would not be satisfactory or feasible from a design or economic perspective. For the reasons discussed, the proposed conceptual plan is the most suitable design for the efficient and aesthetic development of the site. The plan. cannot be implemented within the requirements of Sections 4-2206 (1,A) and 4-2206 (1,C,2) be- cause of the narrow width of the site. Variances to permit 18-foot stall lengths and 20- foot aisle widths for 90° parking are necessary for the implementation of the plan. • ADDEND A 2. APPLICATION ITEM 7 (CONTINUED) TABLE 1 ALTERNATIVE WIDTH DIMENSIONS FOR FOUR ROWS OF PARKING External Stall Depth One-Way Type of Parking Single Row, Double Row Aisle Total All: 45° 21' (code), 36' (code) 12' (code) 102' 60° 22' (code), 37' (code) 17' (code) 115' 90° 20' (code), 40' (code) 24' (code) 128' width variances: 90° 18' 36' 20' 112' Proposal for north half of site: 1 row 90°, 1 row 45° per code per code 113' 1 double row 45° Same as above with variances on 90° parking 107' ADDEND A 3. APPLICATION ITEM 8: SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES AND CONDITIONS The following are special conditions and circumstances that apply to the property and site: o Under Sections 4-2206 (1,A) and 4-2206 (1,C,2), depending on the amount of landscaping that will be on the redeveloped parking lot, may reduce the parking capacity to below the existing number of spaces on the site (350). o The site is the nearest to the south facilities of Boeing Commercial Airplane Company that can be improved for use by employees in that part of the Boeing plant. The site is meant to provide better parking facilities in the area for those employees who would otherwise park on residential streets and in farther parking areas. It is not meant to encourage the greater use of private transportation by employees, but to relocate their parking activity on an improved, consolidated lot. The variance requested will provide for a. marginal increase in the number of parking spaces to reduce the potential for congestion in the redeveloped facility. The marginal increase will also ensure that the landscaping planned for the site will not reduce the number of parking spaces that presently exist on the site. o The property will be used for all-day industrial parking under the B-P zoning which is pending. The B-P zone is intended for commercial parking such as for supermarkets and other retail uses, characteristic of which is periodic in-and-out movement on the part of customers, some of whom may be . unfamiliar with a given parking lot. The code dimensions provide movement space for this high turnover use. The site will be used for all-day parking by the same industrial users (Boeing employees) every working day. As Boeing employees would become familiar with the parking facilities on the site, and would enter and leave their parking stalls only once or twice each day, the extra space provided in the code is not needed. ,t ADDEND A 3. APPLICATION ITEM 8: SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES AND CONDITIONS (CON- TINUED) o The rezone requested for the site is from R-4 (apartment use) to B-P off- site parking). This is the least rezone that could be requested to permit the renovation of the site. The rezone will not introduce a new or greatly expanded use. The two closest B-P zoned properties are approximately 4,500 feet south of the site (one on Whitworth Avenue South, near Houser Way South, the other on Williams Avenue, near South 5th Street.) The property on Whitworth Avenue has parking stalls of 17 feet in length. The other property has stalls with dimensions in conformance with the code. But the property dimensions appeared to accommodate compliance with the code. Both B-P zoned properties are in commercial areas. o Another B-P zoned property is on West Valley Road, approximately 2,600 feet from the intersection with SW 43rd Street. The property is located in an industrial district. The exact location of the property could not be determined at the time of the submittal of this application. But a field check of the approximate location and vicinity revealed that all of the parking spaces there were either less than code depth or were unmarked. All the marked stalls were less than 18 feet long (this includes 2 feet of wheelstop area). o The site is owned by Boeing. The Boeing Facilities Department staff report that the standard Boeing parking lot layout for 90° parking has 20-foot aisles. Boeing Parking lot number 11 (located where North 8th Street inter- sects Boulevard of Champions) has 20-foot aisles and 19-foot stall lengths. The Boeing parking lot on Logan Avenue North due west of the site is unpaved and unmarked. The Boeing parking lot on Logan Avenue North 800 feet north of the site, on the west side of Logan Avenue, has 20-foot aisles and 19-foot parking stalls. The parking lots mentioned are on land zoned for industrial use (H1). ADDENDA 3. APPLICATION ITEM 8: SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES. AND CONDITIONS (CON- TINUED) o Other properties in the vicinity have 90o stalls that are 18 feet long. These include Renton Public Library, Parkside Apartments (corner of North 6th Street and Wells Avenue North), Pizza Hut (on Rainier Avenue, near South 2nd Street), and Diamond Lil's restaurant (321 Rainier South). o In view of the foregoing findings, this variance request is for rights or privi- . leges enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity of the site and by other comparable properties in the City of Renton. ADDENDA 4. APPLICATION ITEM 10: REQUESTED VARIANCES ARE MINIMUM NECESSARY The requested variances are the minimum necessary for the fuller development of consolidated parking on the site. With the variances, the proposed conceptual plan can accommodate four rows of 90° parking in the south half of the site, and one row of 90o parking and three rows of 45o parking in the north half. The maximum number of stalls (excluding landscaping) would be 400. Without the variances, the final capacity of the site, if redeveloped, would be about the same or less than the existing capacity of the site (350 spaces). This would not provide the margin of extra parking spaces that would reduce the potential for congestion in the redeveloped parking facility. The insignificant change or reduction in the number of parking spaces would be a hardship in view of the expense of redeveloping the site, and may require a reconsideration of the feasibility of improving the present parking facilities. ADD END A • 5. APPLICATION ITEM 11: REQUESTED VARIANCES IN HARMONY WITH SURROUNDING PROPERTY AND BENEFICIAL TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND PUBLIC WELFARE With the proposed landscaping and improvements, the variances will allow full and efficient development of the site for parking. By improving the organization of traffic patterns, and the landscaping, the site will in most ways be more complementary to its surroundings than is the case with the present unimproved site in its present use. While traffic in the immediate vicinity may increase as a result of the project, the traffic conditions in the general neighborhood will not change, or will be improved. The project is not intended to encourage the use of private transportation by Boeing employees. The intent of this project is to relocate the parking activity of Boeing employees from other Boeing parking lots and from residential streets. i a fah -2- , " 7. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well as the e tent of the land area affectgd by any environmental impacts, including any othe information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ- mental setting of the proposal ) : The block bounded by Logan Avenue North and Burnett Avenue North, and North 4th and North 6th Streets. Additional description given in Addenda. 8. EstimatelI date for completion of the proposal : End f May 1980. 9. List of ll permits, licenses or government approvals required for the proposal (federal , state and local--including rezones) : Rezope from R-4 to BP, variance on parking stall and aisle sizes, street ROW use p rmit, grading permit, building permit, plumbing permit, electrical permit, star water drainage plan approval, stormwater drainage connection permit, sign 'ermit, and all other permits necessary to complete the project. 10. Do you h ve any plans for future additions , expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain: None. 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your pro osal? If yes, explain: Yes. enton's Comprehensive Plan designates the site for multi-family resid {�ntial development. 12. Attach airy other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal ; i none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, de cribe the nature of such application form: Rezo e application, Street ROW use permit npplinatinn, variance appliratinn_ , J II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) (1) Earth. till the proposal result in: (a) Uns able earth conditions or in changes in geologic sub tructures? X TE — MAYBE R-0-- (b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or over- cov ring of the soil? X YES MAYBE NO (c) Cha ge in topography or ground surface relief fea ures? X Y1 MAYBE R� (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any X uni ue geologic or physical features? Y MAYBE Ri1— (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, eit er on or off the site? X YE- MAYBE NO (f,) Cha►(ges in deposition or erosion of beach sands , or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? X vrs - MIT WO— Explanation: NOTE!t All explanations of environmental impacts are given in the Addenda. CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM OF talk) 42'n FOR OFFICE USE ONLY OEC 1919 Application No. � Environmental Checklist No. 5-36 -7�' � Cti PROPOSED, date: FINAL , date: DEP06\7' ODeclaration of Significance ® Declaration of Significance Declaration of Non-Significance Declaration of Non-Significance COMMENTS: Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires • all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals. The Act also requires that an EIS be prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies' involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where. you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele- vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with- out unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with- out duplicating paperwork in the future. NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals. Many of the questions may not apply to • your proposal . If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. ENVIRONMENNAL CHECKLIST FORM I. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent Boeing Commercial. Aircraft Company 2. Address and phone number of Proponent: c/o L. T. Hedin P.O. Box 3707, MS 62-15 Seattle, Washington 98124 3. Date Checklist submitted December 18, 1979 4. Agency requiring Checklist Renton Planning Department 5. Name of proposal , if applicable: Boeing Renton Parking Lot No. 11 6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature) : On-grade parking lot, approximately 400 stalls. Proposal involves grading, land- scaping, and paving site. About 75% of the site is currently paved and used for parking (capacity of lot, 270 spaces; capacity of abutting street ROW's, 80 spaces; combined capacity, 350 spaces). Project also to include installation of stormwater drainage, lawn sprinklers, and light fixtures. Size of lot: 2.82 acres, size of site including public street ROW used: 3.84 acres. Figure 1 is the conceptual plan for the site. -4- (5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in: (a) Charges in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms , X insects or microfauna)? YES MAYBE NO (b) Red ction of the numbers of any unique, rare or end ngered species of fauna? X YES M YB NO (c) Intlfoduction of new species of fauna into an area, or riesult in a barrier to the migration or movement of auna? X YES MAYBE NO (d) Det rioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? X YES N �N Explanation: Explanation given in Addenda. • (6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: Fxplanatinn given in Addends. (7) Light an Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? X YES MAYBE AT- Explanation: Explanation given in Addenda. (8) Land Use Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present r planned land use of an area? X E — RPM- Nii— Explanation: Explanation given in Addenda. (9) Natural lesources. Will the proposal result in: (a) Inc ease in the rate of use of any natural resources? X YES MAYBE NO (b) Dep etion of any nonrenewable natural resource? X YT MAYBE W Explanation: Explanation given in Addenda. (10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosio(i or the release of hazardous substances (including, but notlimited to, oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? X YES MAYBE NU- Ex lanatr on: (11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distri button, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? X YE3— MAYBE Ar' Explanation: Explanation given in Addenda. -3- • • (2) Air. ' Will the proposal result in: (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air X quality? Ya- MAYBE WO— (b) The creation of objectionable odors? X YT- MAYBE AU— (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? MAYBE N Explanation: Explanation given in Addenda. • (3) Water. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in currents, or the course of direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? X YES MABE NO (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns , or X - the rate and amount of surface water runoff? Y€5 MAYBE0— (c) Alterations' to the course or flow of flood waters? X YES MAYS AU— (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? YE$— MAYBE NO (e) Discharge into surface waters , or in any alteration surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X YES MAYBE k (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? X YET— MAYBE NO .(g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either through direct additions or withdrawals , or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? _ YES MAYBE NO (h) Deterioration in groundwater quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? X PE- WARY PO (i ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? X YES MAYBE MT Explanation: Explanation given in Addenda. (4) Flora. Will the proposal result in: • (a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs , grass, crops , X microflora and aquatic plants)? YET— MAYBE Ais (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? X YET- MAYBE N- (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing X species?' Tr- MAYBE AT— (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? X RE A� Explanation: Explanation given in Addenda. . 2s }cam -6- (d) Sew:•r or septic tanks? X YES MAYBE NO (e). Sto m water drainage? ��(( E N�YES MA`lB :(f) Sol d waste and disposal? X YES MAYBE NO Explanat on: Explanation given in Addenda. (17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? X TM MAYBE NU— Explanat on: Explanation given in Addenda. (18) Aesthetils. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scen c vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site ope to public view? X YES MAYBE NU— Explanation: Explanation given in Addenda. (19) Recreatipn. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality r quantity of existing recreational opportunities? X YET MAYBE NO Explanation: (20) Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? X YE MAYBE WU— Explanation: III. SIGNATURE I , the u dersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and c mplete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla- ration of non'-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any illful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: 4 ' t., 4 .;�` r .s fined L. T. Hedin (name printed) • City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 -5- (12) Housing. Will the •proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: Explanation given in Addenda. (13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? X YES MAYBE NO (b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? X Y E S 'WE E (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems?• _ M_PX (d) Alterations to present ,patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? X VES MMAYBE' (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? X YES— MAYBE if-6— (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles , bicyclists or pedestrians? X YES MAYBE N6— Explanation: Explanation given in Addenda. (14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas : (a) Fire protection? X YES MAYBE 'Nb (b) Police protection? X YES MAY BE N l- (c) Schools? X YES MAYBE if-6— (d) Parks or other recreational facili-ties? YES MAYBE NO (e) Maintenance of public facilities , including roads? X YES MAYBE NO (f) Other governmental services? X YES RATRE NO Explanation: Explanation given in Addenda. (.15) Energy. Will the proposal result in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X YET— WATTE NO (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require X the development of new sources of energy? YES MAYBE NB Explanation: Explanation given in Addenda. (16) Utilities.. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: (a) Power or natural gas? X YES MAYBE ND (b) Communications systems? X YES MAYBE NU (c) Water? X _ YES MAYBE NO OF Re i. c'g 6 ay-go •, .e O THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL GUILOIN,G 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON.WASH.98055 o k BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT .9A 235- 2550 O94lFD SEPlc-��P', April 29, .1980 • Mr. Rich Kato Kramer, Chin do Mayo 1917 First. Avenue Seattle, Washington 98101 RE: BOEING PARKING LOT - DESIGN. REVIEW Dear Mr. Kato : As a follow-up to Jerry Lind ' s conversation with Bob Dill, your landscape architect, it is our understanding that your firm is presently requesting a written response concerning the proposed development plans for the Boeing Logan-Burnett Avenue .Parking Lot. The proposed plans have now been' circulated to the concerned City Departments and comments are as follows: (1) PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. TRAFFIC ENGINEERING At entrances and exits standard driveway section with low earth berms (12" maximum) with low planting (approximately 1.2"+ for a distance of 85 ' left and 65 ' right) for sight distance purposes. The low berm - low planting design concept was agreed to at the March, 1980, meeting with Boeing officials and consultant and City staff. Provision of three street light standards on Logan Avenue North subject to City specifications. • ENGINEERING Driveways to be installed in accordance with the design standards for a commercial cement concrete driveway (note attached drawing) . • UTTILITIES Supply water main plan per standard 22" x 34" drawing - separate for water file, only. Tie-ins to be provided as shown (in red) on utility grading plan. Mr. Rich Kato Kramer, Chin & Mayo April 29, .1980 Page Two BUILDING Approval subject to Variance V-387-80. (2) 'PLANNING DEPARTMENT The proposed layout and landscaping plan meets the design standards of the Parking and Loading Ordinance subject to the variance from the Board of Adjustment. Landscaping plans subject to Planning Department review for special permit. Logan Avenue - Change Kinnikinnick to Photinia and "Otto Luykin" Laurel except at entrance and exit driveways (to preserve sight distance) , spacing subject to review and use of alternative plant material to provide height as previously discussed with Bob Dill. Burnett Avenue North - Proposed plan does not provide for street trees as discussed at both the previous meetings. The trees along Burnett Avenue of the same type and spacing are essential to the total balanced development and screening of the parking lot from the adjacent residential uses . The Hearing Examiner requirement for the placement trees along the east side of Burnett Avenue North has not been addressed, and this issue remains to be resolved at this time. (3) FIRE DEPARTMENT Need for accessways in planters on Burnett Avenue , as discussed. If you and your clients do not wish to comply with these conditions, we will be happy to return the application to the Hearing Examiner for a public hearing on a site plan approval as suggested under Condition #4 of Special Permit, File No. SP-007.80. ' Mr. Rich Kato Kramer, Chin & Mayo April 29, 1980 Page Three If you should have any further questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact this department. Very truly yours, Gordon V. Ericksen Planning Director (---14Arb96 -b(s6.f " Roger J. Blaylock Associate Planner RJB:wr Attachments cc: Lee Hedin Boeing Commercial Airplane Co . • OF R4, • 41 YY"'M C) THE CITY OF RENTON "--rfkit-1' • MUNICIPAL SUILDING 200 MILL AVE.So. RENTON.WASH.98055 o BARBARA' Y. SHINPOCH;:MAYOR• ® LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER t ' ` !•. . . FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 014 February 13, 1980 -'s . • Mr. Lee Hedin • Boeing Commercial Airplane Co. P.O. Box 3707, M.S. 62-15 . • Seattle, WA 98124 • • RE: File No. SP-007-80; Boeing Company; Request for Reconsideration. Dear Mr. Hedin: • Z have received and reviewed the request for reconsideration and revised site plan (labeled Exhibit 07) in the above entitled tatter and believe that the request to submit new information is appropriate in light of the findings that the requested rezone to 3-P was inappropriate and the special permit requires submission of more detailed information. The Planning Department was ap prised of the new17 submitted site plan and construction alternatives, and a response from that department is attached. Condition No. 1: • • The Planning Department indicated that either Alternative 1 or 2 could possibly provide an effective buffer for the residential area east of the proposed parking lot. Alternative 2, which proposes a higher 'buffer with dense shrubs along the top of a reduced berm, would provide some relief from the noise, air pollution and glare problems associated with the proposed parking facility. If this were then coupled with the planting of street trees on the east side of Burnett as proposed by the Planning Department, a further reduction in noise, light, and air pollution could be achieved. • • Condition No. 3: The imposition of restrictive covenants is not an inappropriate provision to assure compliance with the landscaping requirements, although as indicated in your arguments, such covenants required to screen the parking area should not endure longer than the use of the property for a parking facility. Therefore, the covenants should expire at the termination of the lease or the removal of the parking facility, whichever occurs first. % Condition No. 4: • The plans submitted by the applicant appear to contain sufficient detail to permit the Examiner to approve the special permit without further hearing on the matter, and therefore, a Specific site review will not be required unless the Planning Department believes such review is necessary after submission of the final plans for the parking facility. T e• ne:•3. Page Two February 13, 1980 • It should be pointed out that the major thrust of the conditions imposed is to mitigate to the greatest extent possible the impact on the existing, single family homes located directly across Burnett Avenue N. in an area zoned for residential dwellings, and to that end the conditions have only been slightly modified. Therefore, the decision of the Examiner is modified as follows: . DECISIo: : • The special • P permit to establish a parking facility on the subject property is approved subject to the following: • 1. The construction of a berm along the eastern edge of the subject property along Burnett Avenue N. running the length of the parking lot with the exception of those areas, limited to no more than two, needed for access. Said berm shall conform as closely as possible with Alternative No. 2 of Exhibit #7, and contain a dense evergreen hedge on top which at planting shall be approximate)(two to three feet in.•hei t. 2. The landscaping of the berm subject to the approval of the Planning Department. 3. The execution of restrictive covenants to provide a landscape planting area along the perimeter of the parking area not covered by Condition No. 1, above, and the provision of internal landscaping to consist of not less than 5I: of the remaining area of the parking lot. If stall size is varied, that additional area shall be included in the portion of the internal area which shall be subject to the landscaping requirements. The covenants so executed . shall run withthe land but shall terminate upon occurrence of the earlier of the following events; a) the termination of the lease of the city right- of-way; or b) Uhe change in use of the subject property. 4. Site review by the Examiner pursuant to Section 4-3010.A.6 if the Planning • Department inen that such rev* i t assure compliance with the terns azd core Htions � t imod �n� h{s decision. S. The planting of street trees on the east side of Burnett Avenue N; type, location and number subject to approval of the -Planning Department. 6. The special permit shall expire two years from the date of decision if the • applicant has not occupied the subject site and not complied with the conditions enumerated above. Further, the special permit shall expire if for any reason the berm is removed, including the expiration of the lease for the property upon which it is constructed. • new appeal period has now been established for the referenced application, to expire on February 27, 1980. • • • Sincerely, 7i74110 '0Wftlrv64` Fred J. ghufman cc: Parties of Record } ALTERNATE I `` EXPANSION JOINT Sk %- . - 141. 11.00‘. • 304 In v®'' �,� EXPANSION JOINT(YYP) • ��N• 3 \ I,, 411 w. N.<444 %,. 0 12" FOR WIDTH LESS THAN 20° 94 •o' 18"FOR WIDTH GREATER THAN 20° V®', 3p 4f,a EXPANSION JOINT(TYP.) it EXPANSION JOINT VP gssaissit0% MAX. SLOP ow • 6 SECTION A•A EXPANSION JOINT • Ass. II° 4 ALTERNATE 2 y '''''N'<*s..'sINS‘N4'114144 ‘sg e il .d° 4 ' i/ EXPANSION JOINT (YYR) • gyp° `., veo GENERAL NOTES - Jp,, S 4.4 /p,.6e) s'y JOINTS Joints .sholl Do placed os shown or as directed by tha Engineer CITY OF RENTON ENGINEERING DIVISION CONCRETE Concrete shall be 14 day Class 5I1-1/2) STANDARD COMMERCIAL olr entrained Portland current concrete CEMENT CONC. DRIVEWAY PROCEDURES All work shall be in accordance with Ai?W.A. DESIGNED�_�� DATE 10-77 plans and specifications or as directed by DRAWN R B the Engineer. APPROVED 2Y ! o,.AIi. Wn,i,. r;r.rp,, OF RA, �� ® THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 n CHARLES J. DELAURENTI, MAYOR • DELORES A. MEAD o9,0 CITY CLERK 09 7.. SEP�,ge April 23, 1980 Boeing Ciarmercial Airplane Co. P.O. Bolt 3707, M.S. (52-15 Seattle, WA 98124 ATTN: M 4 Lee Hiedin Re: Re orded documents - Rer trittive Covenants Dear Si : Enclose' please find your copy of the document (s) recorded with Ki g County Records and on file with the City Clerk's Office of Renton. Very truly yours CITY OF CY/�h RENTON �,,,,/ a .&,ii a. ',wet Delores A. Mead City Clerk DAM/,db` sc Enc ( 1 i' I.Le :''iu, .iJ'•-U J i-r-3!i "1, The tsoei ng Compan , , .. Yi• { • 1 ''i °t'.•Jx^. LM4VLV'i�' 'L.ff.7ia6 4J'JvL'.1w Fa j .r. .Mtf+ if,' 1` "i, 'P �rt." n< 2" rS t al_ ..r :WIik! twn.. .PiQ: �'cia'ri:ri, .�C' �a. .gin,, wti I r`'�if�'thi�''�'fo'1�.at�►in �.r.. y�� ' ' Cit, fo •lours: � . y'.of Renton 'Cc�unt. '��i'f' Kj,ci(/'V� S�a�`ao!`-�,Wash'�ri .tr�ny 'desc:ri;bed�.as 1 , (S t ac d:,' regal. d4sc.:r1ptian) :.; ..:;,,,, "r',P.' , :WH'EREAS <the:`'owner','of`=' aid:`' escribe ,'_.:rop erein'after- "'the• property " ' . '� `,_:;';� :' r a. d'. d,;}�roperty,,.,..h r l - w tw; rdesires to• impose thefollowing `rests ct=ive' covariant£ ,running with the land as to '' ,:use.�,. present`arid':futUxe`y af:"tlie';:'propetYi'' ;. :NOW; THEREFORE, tithe'`'°'aforesaid';owner' hYereb ;`estab'lishes',` rants-.and iin oses. , "'( '-°Y=': ti{.': ;;:i.4 ••:f?: .. k„_'.'. 4h-. .,fir,•'' `1" 1 - �a�,.,.air.. .j, x �53.� :9 :, �restric ionsncl�'�'s.'.cv.°� ''a 'Es:'�ruan �t`�' : v-�1 -"e1�raEs e.. '• - ' j: 4•x ';I" ... ,!? ra.i. yr. .{\,y attar' S5' 1`:+': .7;'+"::?ti. ::�7•r.,. �h<.'v;.t,�d1''rv.,:5.,,>F .1:-5 ,, - :.r ;,, A •.;:.may.r+ ::.,,;.V,.c.g ,+ =ri,,.ek-,, i,>3yYr 1 'ArS fir,.:4, 1,44: A,.,1.,, . a "",t.,. a''T:" " yr, �tw.�.. 'v :„Llue°^ `:y�'.i,'yl".ar�}''�'�y kr ftq`w3,,rt:.�Ys.f.'.:$�::�• '., > ?'. s--' Baca :nabbit,eq' eedribed pwitn`F'respect to the use"by the undersigned, its successors, ce.; -In heirs and assigns, as follows: • �;t'. .. - - ,LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS �, n' q-'' =A:landscape planting.^area consisting;.of,,fi:ve;''fee,t-'in•widt'h'' shall' be:-planted and. ' = ! - ' maintained along the,-perimeter,-.of�:the.site on the western, ;southern and northern ' a,,, boundaries. In addition', internal';'landscaping",to'' consist =of not less than:'5% of• :r :s,' 'the,gross paved:area:shall be' planted','and'm in aintaedvwithin the interior of the ; ,= - . parking' lot. , ` r. DURATION _" •,. ,, s,'•-''V;,',These covenants shall run.-•with'the-l:and•'and expire.'.upori occurrence of'the earlier : , " - of, the two following events: -1) the. termination. o,f" a revocable permit executed . between The Boeing Company and the City of Renton' for use of right-of-way property `;S -ri. .'-'- located between N. 4th'Street and •N. 6th.'Street' on:Burnett Avenue,N.'; or' 2) any x:'z,,'s,: change in the approved use`of::,thesubject-;property' for a -parking lot. ' ,4 ;proper''legal',proc;edures; in the:;Superior,Court•''Of King County maybe instigated by ' • either the City of ,Renton or any, property, owners adjoining subject property who are •adversely affected' by any violation or'�'breach. of these restrictive 'covenants, , Reasonable attorneys' fees' incur'red.'during;':an' enforcement: proceeding will 'be ' ; " , borne by the parties ,whom;•the--court;:determines'.are ;in error rand 'shall be entered - •f as''a judgment in such action. �• ''77,''--',-' , • ✓Dale R. Graham'' •� Director of,Fac'ilities & •- ..a - Services .' ,'.The Boeing Company, B.C:A:C. (A Division . +' - . of The'Boeing Company) •, STATE OF WASHINGTON). .. • : COUNTY 'OF KING ) ,. • - ' On this - day of ,h' ' • , 19 0, before 'me personally appeared - Dale R. Graham to be known 'to`be':the Director of Facilities and Services for The ' ?:� _;''`Boeing Company, B:C.A.C:, Division, ,that..e• xecuted-the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged- said instrument to ,be,'t'he -free ard,,voluntary act and deed, of'.sa.id: - �hy;. te - ' .. .. r,} „p .p nt'ioned;. and aon oath stated',that her;` corporation for,the uses' and ��u�r oses`.'t2iere'in'•"me was-' authorized'to execute said i•nstrument'',Ffor,said,rcorporation, and that£the seal, ' ' ' •r affixed, if any, is the corporate seal of said-corporation. ' '. '.,Witness -my„ hand,'and official -`seal;''hereto':-a`ffixed.the day arid,year'�firs .;,;ab'oy.e.',' written. q/ D' f",,ek;' rt 6, ;j •,,r •�'4, r„t i`',;, _;t Nota ::P.ublio'- in.,and for • to of`, +:J ,A. : ' ' h ; d / • '. ': . J ,, Wasington, resing ;in �'•tit:•. ';1..1:' :A ,' ',,,.,., :;. t6' ` t "A�'\;i{'I1{t 7y'.'. 9 .v. .< :'i, r � rr s'.nri^^.-+Yt+na�r�..+���' ,.tit`,. - , ,'...,, "'vk.r.a',+rr•+...N..er...c:....! ,'?'n::?:` tar' - -,,�"" : • a - 'ADDENDA I. APPLICATION ITEM 5: LEGAL DESCRIPTION THAT PORTION OF THE BURLINGTON-NORTHERN, INC. (FORMERLY NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY) 100-FOOT, RAILWAY RIGHT-OF- WAY IN SECTIONS 7 AND a, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., LYING BETWEEN THE NORTH MARGIN OF NORTH 4TH STREET AND THE SOUTH MARGIN OF NORTH 6TH STREET IN THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON; O EXCEPT THAT PORTION `THEREOF' LYING WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY OF ,p NORTH 4TH STREET DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT. THE CENTERLINE INTERSECTION OF NORTH 4TH STREET AND WILLIAMS AVENUE NORTH•WHENCE.THE CENTERLINE INTERSECTION OF NORTH 4TH' STREET AND PARK AVENUE NORTH BEARS S89°00'09"E; THENCE N89°00'09"W . ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF NORTH 4TH STREET 284.14 FEET TO A POINT FROM WHENCE THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 7 BEARS Sl°06'06"W 12.43 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING N89°00'09"W ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF NORTH 4TH STREET 67.71 FEET TO THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID RAILWAY AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGIN- NING. THENCE CONTINUING N89°00'09"W ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF NORTH 4TH STREET EXTENDED 104.20 FEET TO THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID RAILWAY; THENCE N17°19'18"E ALONE SAID WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE 73.00 FEET; THENCE S70°33'09"E 100.07 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID RAILWAY WHICH LIES N17°19'18"E 40.00 FEET FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE S17°19'18"W 40.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; . RECORDED Ttlt; PAY CONTAINING 2.82•ACRES, MORE OR LESS. •PR 7 1110 MM 'Pn Please see the drawings on separate sheets for boundaries. REC 0i•.';.S ..rciui S , THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 o amp : . BARBARA' Y. SHINPOCH. MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 9'O FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 09�TFO SEP1toe April 1, 1980 Mr. Lee Hedin Boeing Commercial Airplane Co. P.O. Box 3707, M.S. 62-15 • Seattle, WA , 98124 RE: File No. SP-007-80; Boeing Company Special Permit. Dear Mr. Hedin: This is to notify you that the above referenced request, which was approved subject to restrictive covenants as noted on the Examiner's report of January 24, 1980, and amended in response to your request for reconsideration on February 13, 1980, is now final upon receipt of the signed covenants. The matter is being forwarded to the City Clerk effective this date for permanent filing and restrictive covenants will be filed with King County. Sincerely, • Fred J. Kaufman Hearing Examiner mp cc: Planning Department City Clerk File No. SP-007-80 a Boeing Company DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE-COVENANTS 'WHEREAS, The Boeing Company is the owner of the following real property in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington, described as follows: (See attached legal description) WHEREAS, the owner of said described property, hereinafter "the property," • desires to impose the following restrictive covenants running with the land as to use, present and future, of the property; NOW, THEREFORE, the aforesaid owner hereby establishes, grants and imposes restrictions and covenants running with the land as to the use of the land hereinabove described with respect to the use by the undersigned, its successors, heirs and assigns, as follows: LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS A landscape planting area consisting of five feet in width shall be planted and maintained along the perimeter of the site on the western, southern and northern boundaries. In addition, internal landscaping to consist of not less than 5% of the gross paved area shall be planted and maintained within the interior of the parking lot. DURATION •These covenants shall run with the land and expire.upon occurrence of the earlier of the two following events: 1) the termination of a revocable permit executed between The Boeing Company and the City of Renton for use of right-of-way property located between N. 4th Street and N. 6th Street on Burnett Avenue N.; or 2) any • change in the approved use of the subject property for a parking lot. • Proper legal procedures in the Superior Court of King County may be instigated by either the City of Renton or any property owners adjoining subject property who are adversely affected by any violation or breach of these restrictive covenants. Reasonable attorneys' fees incurred during an enforcement proceeding will be borne by the parties whom the court determines are in error and shall be entered • as a judgment in such action. -`). `Dale R. Grahan(irector of Facilities & Services The Boeing Company, B.C.A.C. (A Division of The Boeing Company) • • STATE OF WASHINGTON) COUNTY OF KING On this day of 77 h , 1.91o, before me personally appeared Dale R. Graham to be known to be the Director of Facilities and Services for The Boeing Company, B.C.A.C. Division, that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he was authorized to execute said instrument for said corporation, and that the teal affixed, if any, is -the corporate seal of said corporation. Witness my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first above written. Notar4 Public in and ford tfdte of Washington, residing in -:�✓ ADD END A • I. APPLICATION ITEM 5: LEGAL DESCRIPTION THAT PORTION OF THE BURLINGTON-NORTHERN, INC. (FORMERLY NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY) 100-FOOT RAILWAY RIGHT-OF- WAY IN SECTIONS 7 AND 8, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., LYING BETWEEN THE NORTH MARGIN OF NORTH 4TH STREET AND THE SOUTH MARGIN OF NORTH 6TH STREET IN THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF LYING WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY OF NORTH 4TH STREET DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE CENTERLINE INTERSECTION OF NORTH 4TH STREET AND WILLIAMS AVENUE NORTH WHENCE THE CENTERLINE INTERSECTION OF NORTH 4TH STREET AND PARK AVENUE NORTH BEARS S89°00'09"E; THENCE N89°00'09"W ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF NORTH 4TH STREET 284.14 FEET TO A POINT FROM WHENCE THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 7 BEARS S1°06106"W 12.43 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING N89°00'09"W ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF NORTH 4TH STREET 67.71 FEET TO THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID RAILWAY AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGIN- NING. THENCE CONTINUING N89°00'09"W ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF NORTH 4TH STREET EXTENDED 104.20 FEET TO THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID RAILWAY; THENCE N17°19'18"E ALONG SAID WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE 73.00 FEET; THENCE S70°33'09"E 100.07 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST . RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID RAILWAY WHICH LIES N17°19'18"E 40.00 FEET FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE 517°19'18"W 40.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; CONTAINING 2.82 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. Please see the drawings on separate sheets 3for boundaries. ' • OF . RA, . • A. �� C) � THE CITY . OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE:'SO: RENTON,WASH.98055. 0 mum o ° BARBARA' Y. SHINP.00H, MAYOR ! LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 9 FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 O9�rFD sEP1eM��Q February 13, 1980 Mr. Lee Uedin • Boeing Commercial Airplane Co. P.O. Box 3707, M.S. 62-15 Seattle, WA 98124 RE: File No. SP-007-80; Boeing Company; Request for Reconsideration. Dear Mr. Hedin: . • I have received and reviewed the request for reconsideration and' revised site plan (labeled Exhibit#7) in the above entitled matter and believe that-the request to submit new information is appropriate., in light of the findings that the requested rezone to B-P was inappropriate and the special permit requires .submission of more detailed information. • The Planning Department was apprised of the newly submitted site plan and construction alternatives, and a response from that department is attached. Condition No. 1: The Planning' Department 'indicated that either Alternative 1 or 2 could possibly provide an effective buffer for the residential area east of 'the proposed parking • , lot. Alternative 2, *which proposes a.higher buffer with dense shrubs• along the top of a reduced berm, would provide some relief from the noise, air pollution and glare problems associated with the proposed parking facility. If this were then coupled with the planting of street. trees on the east side of Burnett as proposed by the Planning Department, a further reduction in noise, light, and air pollution could be achieved. • Condition No. 3: • The. imposition of restrictive covenants is not.an inappropriate provision to . assure compliance 'with the landscaping requirements, although as indicated in your arguments, such covenants required to screen the parking area should not endure longer .than the use of the property for a parking facility. Therefore, the covenants should expire at the termination of the lease or the removal of the parking facility, whichever occurs first. • Condition No. 4: The plans submitted by the applicant appear to contain sufficient detail-to permit the Examiner to approve the special permit without. further hearing on the matter, and therefore, a specific site review will not be required unless the Planning Department believes such review is necessary after submission of the final plans for the parking facility. • Lee Hedin Page. Two February 13, 1980 • It should be pointed out that the major thrust of the conditions imposed is to • mitigate to the greatest extent possible the impact .on the existing single family homes located directly across Burnett Avenue N. in' an area zoned for residential dwellings, and to that end the conditions have only been slightly modified. Therefore, the decision of the Examiner is modified as, follows: DECISION: • • • • The special permit to establish a parking facility on the subject property is approved subject to the. following: 1. The construction of a berm along the eastern edge of the subject property along Burnet: Avenue N. running the length ,of the parking lot with the exception oaf those' areas, limited to no more than two, needed for access. • Said berm sha11 conform as closely as possible with Alternative No. 2 of Exhibit #7, and contain a dense evergreen hedge oh top which. at planting shall •be approximately two to three feet in height. 2. The landscaping of the berm subject to the approval of the Planning Department. 3. The execution of restrictive covenants to provide a.landscape planting area along the perimeter of the parking area not covered by Condition No. 1, above, and the prOvision of internal landscaping to consist of not, less than 5% of the remaining area of the •parking lot. If stall size is varied, that additional area shall be included in the ,portion of the internal area which 'shall be subject to the landscaping requirements. The• covenants so. executed shall run with. the land but shall terminate upon occurrence of the earlier of the following .events: a) the termination of the lease of the city right- of-way; or b) the change in use of the subject property. • 4. Site review by the Examiner pursuant to Section 4-3010.A.6 if the Planning I7eparthent determines that such review is necessary to assure compliance with the terms and conditions specified in this decision. 5. The planting of .street. trees on the east side of Burnett Avenue N; type, • location and number subject to approval of the Planning Department. 6. The special permit shall expire two years from the date of decision if the applicant has not occupied the subject site and not complied with the conditions enumerated above. Further, the special permit shall expire if for any reason the berm is removed, including the expiration of the lease for the property upon which it is constructed. • A new appeal period has now been established for the referenced application, to expire on February 27, 1980. Sincerely, • Fred J. _aufman • cc: Parties of Record • BOEING COMMERCIAL AIRPLANE COMPANY Ra Box 3707 Sea --- -�- Seattle,Washington 98124 M.S. 62-15 A Division of The Boeing Company • February 6, 1980 R-6301-703 Mr. Fred Kaufman RECEIVED City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner CITY OF RENTON Renton Municipal Building HEARING EXAMINER 200 Mill Avenue•South FEB 61980 Renton; Washington 98055 AM • PM .. SUBJECT: Request for Reconsideration 7i8191I0.11112i1i2i3141516 • REFERENCE: File No. R-455-79 (SP-007-80) • Dear Mr. Kaufman: • • We respectfully submit this request for reconsideration of the conditions stipulated in the special permit approval. We feel that there is new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the time of the previous public hearing, and that the decision of the Examiner is based on an "error in judgment," as defined in Renton code 4-3015. REGARDING THE NEW EVIDENCE The application•submitted for the hearing was a rezone application, following'the advice of the Renton Planning Department. The rezone application was for what was thought to have been a B-P zone. The B-P zone was established in 1956, and until this rezone hearing, was presumed to be a bona fide zone by all city departments contacted by Boeing. Since the thrust of the hearing was changed from the consideration of a rezone to the consideration of a special use, Boeing could not be reasonably expected to present evidence at the level of detail required of a special permit. • We feel that the special permit process entails a great degree of exchange between a concerned'developer and the responsible departments in the City of Renton. Elements covered in this exchange would be, specific design details, including landscaping design. In a rezone process,, however, the exchange between a developer and city departments would be of a general, nature, concerning general land use rather than specific landscaping design. Specific landscaping design. was a central issue during the rezone hearing, and Boeing could not be reasonably expected to present landscaping design alternatives for consideration at that time. REQUEST We are therefore submitting alternative landscaping details as new evidence that could not be reasonably available at the time of the 'previous hearing, and respectfully request their consideration. ' REGARDING THE "ERROR IN JUDGMENT" We feel that some of the conditions specified by the Hearing Examiner were based on "errors in judgment," as defined in Renton code 4-3015. oWW81Yee • Mr. Fred Kaufman February 6, 1980 ° Page Two • Condition 1 • • Special permit approval' condition 1 specifies.a 42-inch berm to be constructed in the'land- scaping strip:facing Burnett Avenue North. The Hearing Examiner. notes that the berm is the most, satisfactory means of buffering the residences along Burnett Avenue North from the visual'and noise problems of the tb-be-renovated parking lot. We appreciate that the proposed 42-inch berm. would provide a partial visual screen and partially reflect noise emanating from the parking activities in the renovated lot, and have endeavored to fulfill these objectives to the maximum extent possible. We have concluded that the only Way to construct the berm would be to use a retaining wall, or bulkhead, so that the slope of the berm would not be too excessive. To construct this retaining wall would require a variance .on Renton Code 4- 717(c)(5-a), since it would be. on a public right-of-way. Mr. Eriksen,. Planning. Department Director; has advised that, while .it is not unusual for a berm or fencing to extend into the public right-of-way, structures or walls are not allowed., To. construct the 42-inch berm without a retaining,wall would require the elimination of a row of parking, or the loss, of approximately 90 parking stalls, to provide the setback needed ;for a gentle. enough slope that would help control erosion of the berm. The loss of this number of stalls would make the renovation project•infeasible° • Request for Condition'1 • • We respectfully request the Hearing Examiner to reconsider the 42-inch berm.requirement, 'to allow a lower berm that would not require a retaining wall fora feasible design. If the Hearing Examiner, after reconsideration, still feels a 42-inch.noise and visual barrier is needed, then we request that the Examiner consider the nonberm alternative of an architectural .wall: This alternative would require the submittal of a'variance application for the construction of a wall in a public. right-of-way. The alternative landscaping designs submitted. with this letter of request show various means, by which partial visual and noise pollution control can be achieved. The alternative which achieVes most Of these ends is the one incorporating a lower than.42- inch berm with, a hedge. . The Board of Public Works has .previously approved use of.the public right-of-way for, among other things, such a hedge. Condition 3 • • Condition 3, requiring restrictive covenants, ,serves to guarantee that Boeing will not seek•a variance from the code standards for internal and perimeter landscaping. The proposed covenants are unnecessary for the following reasons: o The perimeter and five percent internal landscaping code requirements can 'be simply stated as conditions of the special use permit. Restrictive covenants on •the landscaping, while achieving the same effect, would be tied to,the property. In the event of ownership change or ,rezone, the covenants would still be in effect. Because the landscaping requirements are being stipulated for a special • use allowable only for the duration Of the special use permit, we request that the' Hearing.Examiner consider the limitation of the covenants to the tenure of the special use permit, or the substitution of the covenants with landscaping . conditions in the special use permit. o The perimeter landscaping areas are being leased from the City of Renton, which • can enforce any landscaping requirements through the lease agreement. • /0/(0/ 77. Mr. Fred Kaufman February 6, 1980 Page Three • Request for Condition 3 For the above reasons, we respectfully request that the Hearing Examiner reconsider the requirement of restrictive covenants, and substitute the restrictive covenants with landscaping conditions in the special use permit: Condition 4• The Hearing Examiner has noted that a site plan review is needed "to assure the total inte- gration of the proposal into the area and provide. the necessary detail for comprehensive review . . . after consideration •and recommendations by the various city departments." Mr. Blaylock of the Planning Department has advised us that the site review by the Hearing Examiner is to guarantee that the requirements of the Examiner are •satisfied. We appreciate that the Examiner., is concerned with the coordination of the plan review. We have discussed the matter Of coordination with the Planning.Director. He indicated that the Planning Depart- ment would be willing to handle the responsibility of plan review. He noted that the department would see to it that the intent of the Hearing Examiner is carried out. We ask the Hearing Examiner to consider the effect of inflation on project costs. The cost of the renovation project is estimated to be in the .range of $400,000. to $490;000. .The entire public hearing process would take approximately 2-1/2 months., The current annual rate of inflation is approximately 13.2 percent, or roughly 1.1 percent per month: The 2-1/2-month site review process would mean'an increase in project costs ranging from $11,000 to more than $13,000. This amount of money would go a long way toward financing the costs of landscaping improve- ments. The Hearing Examiner has noted in the special use permit approval that the final site plan is contingent upon the granting of certain variances. These variances are the following: 1) Variance on Section 4-2206(1)(A) to permit 18-foot stalls on 90-degree parking. 2) Variance on Section 4-2206(1)(C)(2) to permit 20-foot aisles on 90-degree parking. 3) Variance on Section 4-702(11) to permit front yard to be measured from site boundary instead of property boundary. 4) Variance on Section 4-2204(3)(C)(1-c) to permit parking on front yard (intrusion of approximately 3 feet of parking into front yard). 5) If a retaining wall, architectural fence, or hedge is required as a condition by the • Hearing Examiner, then a variance on Section 4-717(A,1)(C)(5-a) would be needed to permit the wall or hedge on a public right-of-way. 6) Variance on Section 4-2204(8)(B)(2) to permit a landscaped front yard in lieu of landscaping strip between a parking lot edge and an abutting street right-of-way. • • Mr. Fred Kaufman February 6, 1980 Page Four • If any of variances 1 through 6 are not granted, the project 'would become infeasible. The dimensions of the property and site present 'difficult design problems, and the above 'variances are the minimal necessary to permit renovation of the existing parking lot. For these reasons, the dimensions . of the parking and landscaping areas as shown in the alternatives are; practically speaking, final dimensions. • Request for Condition 4 • We respectfully submit the request that the Hearing Examiner consider and select one of the alternative landscaping and traffic access designs herein submitted as the approved conceptual landscaping and traffic access design for the site; to remove the condition of a public hearing site review; and to designate the Planning Department as the responsible agency for site review and enforcement of the approved design. The alternative designs submitted with this request for reconsideration are viable alternatives. The Planning Department has indicated its willingness and ability to handle the responsibility of plan review to carry out the intent of the Hearing Examiner. , Boeing would submit a more finished .design; subject .to the approval of. the Planning Department, as part of the building plans 'for:•'the building permit review. The designated landscaping and traffic access design would effectively finarlize the site plan; For this reason, we respectfully request the Hearing Examiner.' to consider the, recommendations of the concerned city departments, .including Traffic, Planning,, Building, Engineering, and Water Departments On the choice of design' alternative. SUMMARY OF REQUESTS • • For the above reasons,.we respectfully request the Hearing Examiner to review the alternative designs submitted herein as new evidence which could not reasonably be expected to be avail- able at the time of the hearing. We also request that, after reviewing these alternatives, the Examiner reconsider condition 1, the 42-inch berm, and 'condition 4, the public hearing site plan review. Finally, we respectfully request the, Hearing Examiner to 'reconsider condition 3, the restrictive covenants. We feel that there were "errors in judgment," as defined in Renton Code 4-3015, and that these conditions merit review. Sincerely yours, BOEING COMMERCIAL AIRPLANE CO. 'ea P4- Lee T. Hedin Planning Division LTH:ks/vlb Enclosures cc: 'Michael Terrin; Boeing Richard Kato, KCM Arthur Lee, KCM . ° • THEE CitTY F. IRENTO (!pss i, al uNtCiPr L 8011. 3NG A1.11 WALL AVE. SO. RENTON, ,1 S6l. 9805E . 2 teii BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH.. MAYON n LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER • • 09.0 `° FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 0,9q' �Q ED SEP- °® • February 7, 1980 • TO: Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director • FROM: Fred J. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner gE: . File No. SP-007-80; The Boeing Company; Request for Reconsideration. • Attached please find a copy of a request for reconsideration'for the - above referenced file. Also included is a site plan and alternative "berm" configurations. ' T would appreciate receiving your recommendations and comments on the proposed parking area by 5:00 p.m. Friday, February 8, 1980 so that 1 can promptly respond to the applicant's request. • P"cii . - 0\k'il: ;•:-.-- ----- - .- Attachmen i • Or • RA A e.v 4:, ., o THE CITY OF RE. c.- �� '' MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 • 0 j • BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR. o PLANNING DEPARTMENT • 235- 2550 • • �QTEC SEPZEMO • • MEMORANDUM February 8, 1980 • TO: Fred J. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner • FROM: Gordon Y. Ericksen , Planning Director • By : Roger J. Blaylock, Associate Planner RE: ..` File SP-007-80 , THE BOEIN.G COMPANY The Boeing Company is requesting reconsideration of three Conditions of the Hearing Examiner' s special permit approval . The applicant is, stating that their preparation for the public hearing was. based upon a rezone application , and the ultimate decision was for a special permit . Special permit applications typically require much more detail in the. initial presentation and in the analysis by the Planning Department . The first condition that was placed on the approv.a,l for the special permit was an attempt to create a 42" high screen . With • the amount of space available , a berm with a retaining wall was the natura solution . It is possible, as suggested in alternatives #1 and #2 to Use a combination berm and retaining wall that are not as high with a thick screen of shrubs on top of the berm. The third alternative would utilize more width, thus causing a shortening of the stall length and possibly create some maintenande.. problems in the landscaping areas . It is suggested that either alternative #1 or #2 could be used. However, the retaining wall itself should be textured to add some aesthetic variations to the face of a bare concrete wall . The second request for reconsideration on condition #3 is also relevant . The lease between the City. of Renton and the Boeing Company can, be r. •ide quite specific including the intent . The Board of Public Works can allow the use of the excess right-of-way for landscaping. however, in any case , if the City were to revoke • the lease, the entire parking lot would have to be re-evaluated, and any use stopped at that point . The request for reconsideration of condition #4 has been tied down to a specific site plan than originally submitted and the variances enumerated under Condition #4 cover all of the necessary ordinance adjustments . • • Memorandum to Hearing Examiner February 8, 1080 Page -2- • • • • The Planning Department would typically review the landscaping . plans and 'as suggested for condition #1 , landscaping on top of a reduced berm would provide part of the required screening. Therefore , with the modifications submitted in the plan, the Planning Department sees no reason why the site plan should be resubmitted to the Hearing Examiner. The plan has become more specific and the ' only problem that can be foreseen at this point is 'if the Board of Adjustment does not grant. the necessary variances . At that point , the applicant would go back to square one and begin again with a revised' site plan. • The Planning Department feels that the requested reconsideration. by the applicant is appropriate and the controls to assure that the intent of the special permit are complied with are adequate . The only additional point that could be made is that Burnett Avenue presently has 17 feet of right-of-way- on the east side of the street . If that right-of-way, which is presently used for a parking strip, .would be reduced, to six feet , sufficient . a.r.ea could be added to the lease. agreement between the Boeing Company and the City of Renton to eliminate the need for a variance of parking stall length and aisle width. However, it would require that Burnett Avenue would have to be reconstructed by the Boeing Company: One other alternativ3 that could be, used to provide the buffering of the parking lot to residential development on the east side of Burnett Avenue would be the actual planting of street trees by the Booing Company .in . the 17-foot planting bed on. the east side of the sheet . This would' soften the total effect of the parking lot with a minimal amount of cost to the Boeing Company. • We would recommend that this be added as a condition in the reconsideration of the application as a means of mitigating the • reduction of the heighth of the berm on the west side of Burnett . RJB: sh • • • • BOEING COMMERCIAL AIRPLANE COMPANY P.O. Box 3707 Seattle,Washington 98124 M.S. 62-15 A Division of The Boeing Company February 6, 1980 R-6301-703 Mr. Fred Kaufman RECEIVED City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner CITY OF RENTON Renton Municipal Building HEARING EXAMINER 200 Mill Avenue South FEB 61980 Renton, Washington 98055 AM PM ,. SUBJECT: Request for Reconsideration 7l8t9110,11r12W2I314'516 REFERENCE: File No. R-455-79 (SP-007-80) Dear Mr. Kaufman: We respectfully submit this request for reconsideration of the conditions stipulated in the special permit approval. We feel that there is new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the time of the previous public hearing, and that the decision of the Examiner is based on an "error in judgment," as defined in Renton code 4-3015. REGARDING THE NEW EVIDENCE The application submitted for the hearing was a rezone application, following the advice of the Renton Planning Department. The rezone application was for what was thought to have been a B-P zone. The B-P zone was established in 1956, and until this rezone hearing, was presumed to be a bona fide zone by all city departments contacted by Boeing. Since the thrust of the hearing was changed from the consideration of a rezone to the consideration of a special use, Boeing could not be reasonably expected to present evidence at the level of detail required of a special permit. We feel that the special permit process entails a great degree of exchange between a concerned developer and the responsible departments in the City of Renton. Elements covered in this exchange would be specific design details, including landscaping design. In a rezone process, however, the exchange between a developer and city departments would be of a general nature, concerning general land use rather than specific landscaping design. Specific landscaping design was a central issue during the rezone hearing, and Boeing could not be reasonably expected to present landscaping design alternatives for consideration at that time. REQUEST We are therefore submitting alternative landscaping details as new evidence that could not be reasonably available at the time of the previous hearing, and respectfully request their consideration. REGARDING THE "ERROR IN JUDGMENT" We feel that some of the conditions specified by the Hearing Examiner were based on "errors in judgment," as defined in Renton code 4-3015. /0/70/z 7W Mr. Fred Kaufman February 6, 1980 Page Two Condition 1 Special permit approval condition 1 specifies a 42-inch berm to be constructed in the land- scaping strip facing Burnett Avenue North. The Hearing Examiner notes that the berm is the most satisfactory means of buffering the residences along Burnett Avenue North from the visual and noise problems of the to-be-renovated parking lot. We appreciate that the proposed 42-inch berm would provide a partial visual screen and partially reflect noise emanating from the parking activities in the renovated lot, and have endeavored to fulfill these objectives to the maximum extent possible. We have concluded that the only way to construct the berm would be to use a retaining wall, or bulkhead, so that the slope of the berm would not be too excessive. To construct this retaining wall would require a variance on Renton Code 4- 717(c)(5-a), since it would be on a public right-of-way. Mr. Eriksen, Planning Department Director, has advised that, while it is not unusual for a berm or fencing to extend into the public right-of-way, structures or walls are not allowed. To construct the 42-inch berm without a retaining wall would require the elimination of a row of parking, or the loss of approximately 90 parking stalls, to provide the setback needed for a gentle enough slope that would help control erosion of the berm. The loss of this number of stalls would make the renovation project infeasible. Request for Condition 1 We respectfully request the Hearing Examiner to reconsider the 42-inch berm requirement, to allow a lower berm that would not require a retaining wall for a feasible design. If the Hearing Examiner, after reconsideration, still feels a 42-inch noise and visual barrier is needed, then we request that the Examiner consider the nonberm alternative of an architectural wall. This alternative would require the submittal of a variance application for the construction of a wall in-a public right-of-way. The alternative landscaping designs submitted with this letter of request show various means by which partial visual and noise pollution control can be achieved. The alternative which achieves most of these ends is the one incorporating a lower than 42- inch berm with a hedge. The Board of Public Works has previously approved use of the public right-of-way for, among other things, such a hedge. Condition 3 Condition 3, requiring restrictive covenants, serves to guarantee that Boeing will not seek a variance from the code standards for internal and perimeter landscaping. The proposed covenants are unnecessary for the following reasons: o The perimeter and five percent internal landscaping code requirements can be simply stated as conditions of the special use permit. Restrictive covenants on the landscaping, while achieving the same effect, would be tied to the property. In the event of ownership change or rezone, the covenants would still be in effect. Because the landscaping requirements are being stipulated for a special use allowable only for the duration of the special use permit, we request that the Hearing Examiner consider the limitation of the covenants to the tenure of the special use permit, or the substitution of the covenants with landscaping conditions in the special use permit. o The perimeter landscaping areas are being leased from the City of Renton, which can enforce any landscaping requirements through the lease agreement. /A')7. /z ��L' Mr. Fred Kaufman February 6, 1980 Page Three Request for Condition 3 For the above reasons, we respectfully request that the Hearing Examiner reconsider the requirement of restrictive covenants, and substitute the restrictive covenants with landscaping conditions in the special use permit. Condition 4 The Hearing Examiner has noted that a site plan review is needed "to assure the total inte- gration of the proposal into the area and provide the necessary detail for comprehensive review . . . after consideration and recommendations by the various city departments." Mr. Blaylock of the Planning Department has advised us that the site review by the Hearing Examiner is to guarantee that the requirements of the Examiner are satisfied. We appreciate that the Examiner is concerned with the coordination of the plan review. We have discussed the matter of coordination with the Planning Director. He indicated that the Planning Depart- ment would be willing to handle the responsibility of plan review. He noted that the department would see to it that the intent of the Hearing Examiner is carried out. We ask the Hearing Examiner to consider the effect of inflation on project costs. The cost of the renovation project is estimated to be in the range of $400,000 to $490,000. The entire public hearing process would take approximately 2-1/2 months. The current annual rate of inflation is approximately 13.2 percent, or roughly 1.1 percent per month. The 2-1/2-month site review process would mean an increase in project costs ranging from $11,000 to more than $13,000. This amount of money would go a long way toward financing the costs of landscaping improve- ments. The Hearing Examiner has noted in the special use permit approval that the final site plan is contingent upon the granting of certain variances. These variances are the following: 1) Variance on Section 4-2206(1)(A) to permit 18-foot stalls on 90-degree parking. 2) Variance on Section 4-2206(1)(C)(2) to permit 20-foot aisles on 90-degree parking. 3) Variance on Section 4-702(11) to permit front yard to be measured from site boundary instead of property boundary. 4) Variance on Section 4-2204(3)(C)(1-c) to permit parking on front yard (intrusion of approximately 3 feet of parking into front yard). 5) If a retaining wall, architectural fence, or hedge is required as a condition by the Hearing Examiner, then a variance on Section 4-717(A,1)(C)(5-a) would be needed to permit the wall or hedge on a public right-of-way. 6) Variance on Section 4-2204(8)(B)(2) to permit a landscaped front yard in lieu of landscaping strip between a parking lot edge and an abutting street right-of-way. • Mr. Fred Kaufman February 6, 1980 Page Four If any of variances 1 through 6 are not granted, the project would become infeasible. The dimensions of the property and site present difficult design problems, and the above variances are the minimal necessary to permit renovation of the existing parking lot. For these reasons, the dimensions of the parking and landscaping areas as shown in the alternatives are, practically speaking, final dimensions. Request for Condition 4 We respectfully submit the request that the Hearing Examiner consider and select one of the alternative landscaping and traffic access designs herein submitted as the approved conceptual landscaping and traffic access design for the site; to remove the condition of a public hearing site review; and to designate the Planning Department as the responsible agency for site review and enforcement of the approved design. The alternative designs submitted with this request for reconsideration are viable alternatives. The Planning Department has indicated its willingness and ability to handle the responsibility of plan review to carry out the intent of the Hearing Examiner. Boeing would submit a more finished design, subject to the approval of the Planning Department, as part of the building plans for the building permit review. The designated landscaping and traffic access design would effectively finalize the site plan, For this reason, we respectfully request the Hearing Examiner to consider the recommendations of the concerned city departments, including Traffic, Planning, Building, Engineering, and Water Departments on the choice of design alternative. SUMMARY OF REQUESTS For the above reasons, we respectfully request the Hearing Examiner to review the alternative designs submitted herein as new evidence which could not reasonably be expected to be avail- able at the time of the hearing. We also request that, after reviewing these alternatives, the Examiner reconsider condition 1, the 42-inch berm, and condition 4, the public hearing site plan review. Finally, we respectfully request the Hearing Examiner to reconsider condition 3, the restrictive covenants. We feel that there were "errors in judgment," as defined in Renton Code 4-3015, and that these conditions merit review. • Sincerely yours, BOEING COMERCIAL AIRPLANE CO. 47 ,SIQ42c Lee T. Hedin Planning Division LTH:ks/vlb Enclosures cc: Michael Terrin, Boeing Richard Kato, KCM Arthur Lee, KCM /Aylo/L W OF RA) • o THE CITY OF RENTON . t . 0 z . . . MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH..98055.. o o BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH; MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER �. co- FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 .140 SEPI.e° February 7,; 1980 ' • ' TO: ' . • • • Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director ,FROM: Fred J. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner RE: File No. SP-007-80; the Boeing Company; , , Request for Reconsideration. , Attached please find a copy of a request for reconsideration for. the above referenced file. Also included is a site plan. and alternative "berm" configurations. I would appreciate receiving your recommendations and comments on ,the proposed parking area by 5:00 p.m. Friday, February 8, 1980 so that I can promptly respond to the applicant's request. . . i'C./.t, •\(( i''''- -- • Attachmen OF R.4, • 0 THE CITY OF RENTON MUMCIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 - ma CZMITP BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR 0 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 09� 235- 2550 °91 TFC SEP�E�1' ®f A' OR M February 8, 1980 TO: Fred J. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner FROM: Gordon Y. Ericksen , Planning Director 10 By: Roger J. Blaylock, Associate Planner RE: File SP-007-80 , THE BOEING COMPANY The Boeing Company is requesting reconsideration of three conditions of the Hearing Examiner' s special permit' approval . The applicant is stating that their preparation for the public hearing was based upon a rezone application , and the ultimate decision was for a special permit . Special permit applications typically require much more detail in the initial presentation and in the analysis by the Planning Department . The first condition that was placed on the approval for the special permit was an attempt to create a 42" high screen . With the amount of space available , a berm with a .retaining wallwas the nature solution . It is possible, as suggested in alternatives #1 and #2 to use a combination berm and retaining wall that are not as high with a thick screen of shrubs on top of the berm. The third alternative would utilize more width, thus causing a shortening of the stall length and possibly create some maintenance problems in the landscaping areas . It is suggested that either alternative #1 or #2 could be used. However, the retaining wall itself should be textured to add some aesthetic variations to the face of a bare concrete wall . The second request for reconsideration on condition #3 is also relevant . The lease between the City of Renton and the Boeing Company can be r:2de quite specific including the intent . The Board of Public Works can allow the use of the excess right-of-way for landscaping. However, in any case, if the City were to revoke the lease,- the entire parking lot would have to be re-evaluated, and any use stopped at that point . The request for reconsideration of condition #4 has been tied down to a specific site plan, than originally submitted and the variances enumerated under Condition #4 cover all of the necessary ordinance adjustments . Memorandum to Hearing Examiner February :8, 1980 Page -2- The Planning Department would typically review the landscaping plans and as suggested for condition #1 , landscaping on top of a reduced berm would provide part of the required screening. Therefore , with the modifications submitted in the plan, the Planning Department sees no reason why the site plan should be resubmitted to the Hearing Examiner. The plan has become more specific and the only problem that can be foreseen at this point is if the Board of Adjustment does not grant the necessary variances . At that point , the applicant would go back to square one and begin again with a revised site plan. The Planning Department feels that the requested reconsideration by the applicant is appropriate and the controls to assure that the intent of the special permit are complied with are adequate . The only additional point that could be made is that Burnett Avenue presently has 17 feet of right-of-way on the east side of the street. If that right-of-way, which is presently used for a parking strip, would be reduced to six feet , sufficient area could be added to the lease agreement between the Boeing Company and the City of Renton to eliminate the need for a variance of parking stall length and aisle width. However, it would require that Burnett Avenue would have to be reconstructed by the Boeing Company. One other alternative that could be used to provide the buffering of the parking lot to residential. development on the east side of Burnett Avenue would be the actual planting of street trees by the Boeing Company in the 17-foot planting bed on the east side of the street . This would soften the total effect of the parking lot with a minimal amount of cost to the Boeing Company. We would recommend that this be added as a condition in the reconsideration of the application as a means of mitigating the reduction of the heighth of the berm on the west side of Burnett . RJB: sh AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING State of Washington) • ) County of King °Marilyn J. Petersen , being first duly sworn, upon oath disPoses and states: That on the 24thday Of January , 19 80 I affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below-entitled application or petition. this day Subscribed and sworn A - day of J,":\nocl 19 SO ! \ )\) 5 • A-\W Notary Public in and for the State _ of Washington, residing at RefitOn, , Application, Petition or Case The Boeing Company; SP-007-80 (The minati4 contain a ti4t otc the partied o )Leco4d) , SP-007-80 Page Two Ih reviewing Exhibia;�#;l;,':�Mr: Blaylock noted that increased trafT'� impact to the area , would occur as a result,,•o provision of an improved,parking,.lob ,ich'would" increase t,..r«s^'gar', utilization beyond;?'tYie;-'c:urrent 200 vehicles. Referencing Se°ct ,oih' L '7' of, Exhibit #1 regarding provisions of `a variance application, ,Mr, Blaylock ;corrected the second line to read: ". . .aisle,width' and stall length. He also corrected'`.the word, "staff", in • • the fourth line, s'ame '.section, to "stall. " He noted that without provision of curb stops, the overhang. from vehicles would infringe two feet into the landscaped area. " Utilizing Exhibit #6, Mr. ' Blaylock advised that one access had been eliminated to , Burnett Avenue N. and an additional. access provided to Logan Avenue* N.', although , accessways. a're not aligned. He also added Section L.9 to Exhibit #1, to reflect a minimum 'requirement of 5% internal landscaping per the Parking and Loading Ordinance which will create the necessity of site plan revisions. The Examiner requested testimony by the applicant. Responding was: ' Rich Kato • • 1917 First Avenue' •• . Seattle, WA 98101 V Mr. Kato, representing the applicant, indicated concern regarding specific•.departmental reconmendations relating to design details 'during review of the -rezone•:request, particularly provision of a landscaped berm or wall on Burnett. Avenue N. The Examiner advised that rezones may be approved with restrictive covenants 'running with the land requiring landscaping and buffering as a ,permanent feature of development. Mr. Kato - ;inquired if specific design of •the berm would be subject to further'review. The Examiner indicated,that dependent upon the recommendation of the Examiner which is further subject to final approval, by the City Council, either covenants requiring provision of design • features, subject to,final review by the Planning Department, or further site plan review by the Hearing..,Examiner may be required. Mr. 'Kato stated that due to utilization of a portion Of public right-of-way on Burnett Avenue N. , restrictions 'may exist for provision.of certain features. Mr: Blaylock clarified that although restrictions exist in -the event utility lines are located beneath that portion of the roadway, it is his opinion that lines 'ih Burnett Avenue N. are set off-center ih the street. The Examiner requested Mr: Blaylock to designate on the map the location of. city right- of=way, and the width from the applicant's property to city property. Mr. Blaylock indicated. an' eXisting width of from five to seven feet plus five additional feet for landscaping to total 10 to 12 feet on Burnett Avenue N. Mr. Kato noted that the strip varies in correlation to the roadway. Mr. Blaylock also advised that the strip. appears to vary in a similar Manner on Logan Avenue N.,, ranging from five:to 10 feet up to 20 feet 'on 'the southern end. Mr. Kato advised that dimension of stalls along' Burnett Avenue N. are proposed at 20 feet. with plans to move the curbing back two feet to create a wheel stop which' would allow seven feet for a planter strip, although overhang •would intrude into 'the area. „The-Examiner noted that a variance request to reduce the dimension' Of the remainder of Stalls to 18. f.eet would be .subject to review by the Board, of Adjustment. Mr. Kato concluded his testimony by stating the applicant's ' Willingness to coordinate design plans to meet berm and landscaping. requirements following approval ,of the requested rezone, but requested that final details, not be • specified at this time. The Examiner requested further testimony in support of the application. Responding was: ' Bruce McKay ' V . 241 Factory Avenue N. 'Renton, WA 98055 • Mr. McKay corrected, Exhibit #1 and the Final. Declaration Of Non-Significance which denote the location of the. proposal on the west side of Logan Avenue N. , and should be changed to the east .side of said street: He supported approval of the request which will enhance the general appearance of the, area. .A. -• , ' 'The Examiner "requested further testimony,`'in support of. the application Responding was: • r y '':. , "• „ . Arthurthee= s` 1, " .- ' 'i. i-.t; • ' • i - 1917. ; e 5 , ' ``•'. • • ,, • , , ,Seattle,,;WA i,- 9;8101: . -r ' ' • ' • .. t-' ;� _ • ' `yyet!-.•' t ' � ',• , _� r rF .S't.' NI .dJ �{ I' `'rv�idz: .'.;• ... 4 f - „S, • ,, - Responding`!to',ft " he•.concern 'regarding Lega9;ity of' thhe. use, Mr.i ',L'ee;. repres.enting;�tlie :appl:,icant,, .advis c,,,]„. at 'a '1953`aerial-photograph and,, representativesd',of.. the Boein :;• _•,:; 'Eng'ine'ering'Department'!,h'ad verified that';the parking: lot .was serving .at'l .east'�20!'. ',', ." : • indicus• i ,v045449s, .at,'tppt',:,ts ••p However., S u s ori 'with' 'Burling.ton.Np>W;thet,414 aid..r4Moff c .z1l;s;'=klk C �� 'a �". ,•'!`;, ,tfl�+., f -r � Lf �- ,f., •(� v. f...YSF o�:; `'>;: ,confirmation o f`ut''i1•ization of the lot arTkin-s ur-oses: r,i•or:..to 'Consunun,ation''o.f;' he :•� M "19'�.,...,-,.-,1 i a` em `nt as.'•unsuccessful ;, t` ei•: { :. 3' ' ,,• 0- :E' t 'rd h4 -. r `i°I =r'" riy. •li r 'a' ") v t,1 ',d 1S 1 i .f•' A'l,r l 'S ,`i - t- c ;d - "i '4 fd n J a.r`,.-J •i n .`.: - 1• '•r • 1( rr • ' ro; Y+1. ,9% • r i 1 f. .5 -,. ''+( ,,,' ! , ., Mlx�Y t* '""f, Y-1_I r.'„ - ,4 r."'4�'�:.':,- , .-tii'V •'1. _ January 24, 1980 7 ' OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND' DECISION . APPLICANT: The Boeing Company FILE NO. R-455-79 (SP-007-80) LOCATION: West side of Logan Avenue N. between N. 4th Street and N. 6th Street. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant has requested a rezone of the subject site from R-4 to B-P to allow for major improvement and partial expansion of the existing parking facilities. Upon further research and review of the proposed zoning category, the Examiner has determined that no such zoning category exists, and has reviewed the request within the guidelines of the special permit process (See Interpretation by the Examiner, Page 5) . SUMMARY OF DECISION: Planning Department Recommendation: Approval with; conditions. Hearing Examiner Decision: Approval with restrictive covenants. PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department preliminary report was received by REPORT: the Examiner on January 14, 1980. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining available information on file with the application., and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on January 15, 1980 at 10:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and the applicant had received and reviewed the Planning Department report, and the report was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. The Examiner advised that an incorrect Final Declaration of Non-Significance has been inadvertently attached to Exhibit #1, and a supplementary declaration for the subject proposal is available to interested parties. He also indicated that due to previous deletion of codified sections of the Zoning Code pertaining to the B-P zone, further review of the matter by the Examiner and the City Attorney is proceeding to determine allowable uses of the zoning district, if in fact the category legally exists. Roger Blaylock, Associate Planner, reviewed Exhibit #1, and entered the following additional exhibits into the record:• Exhibit #2: Vicinity Map Exhibit #3: Vicinity Land Use Map ' Exhibit #4: Aerial Photograph Exhibit #5: Site Plan (as submitted) Exhibit #6: Site Plan (with staff comments) The Examiner 'inquired regarding required setbacks from Logan Avenue N. to the parking lot. Mr. Blaylock advised that a five-foot setback along the perimeter would be required, although a 10-foot setback appears to exist on Logan Avenue N. which would be slightly modified by the proposed sawtooth parking pattern. Referencing Section 4-2204.3.0 of the Parking and Loading Ordinance, the Examiner noted that a variance would be required if less than a 10-foot setback is provided on the front yard, or if the proposed lot does not exist within 500 feet of the use it serves. SP-007-80 Page Four supported the recommendation for provision of berming and landscaping which would mitigate these impacts, and indicated disappointment that two access roads are proposed to Burnett Avenue N. ,, although the department had recommended a reduction from three points of access, because vehicles exiting the lot will utilize residential streets for access to major arterials. Regarding access points to Logan Avenue N. , Mrs. Vaupel inquired if left-turn signalization would be provided. Mr. Hedin indicated that discussion with the city's Traffic Engineering Division had resulted in the proposal to provide two entrances from Logan and three accesses on Burnett which would be utilized for both ingress and egress. He noted that although the possibility exists for traffic to exit onto Logan, turning movement would be restricted to right turns in a northerly direction because of infeasibility of installation of a traffic signal due to limited traffic storage space. He noted that limited traffic activity would occur during two 15-minute periods in the morning and afternoon, and upgrading the lot would result in widening Burnett Avenue N. from two 10-foot lanes to two 11-foot lanes which will alleviate existing congestion on the residential street. Mrs. Vaupel objected to traffic from 400 vehicles in residential neighborhoods. The Examiner inquired regarding estimated vehicle trips per day. Mr. Blaylock advised that due to the nature of the business use which the parking lot serves, estimated trips would amount to two or two and one-half times the number of parked vehicles or 1,000 trips per day. Mr. Hedin felt that capacity of the proposed parking lot would be established at approximately 275 vehicles upon provision of all required improvements. Mr. Lee corrected the proposed estimate, of parking lot capacity to approximately 350 vehicles upon completion of the project. Mrs. Vaupel objected to dedication of land for the purpose of automobile parking; supported organization of a seminar attended by representatives of the city, the Boeing Company, and Metro to improve public transit; and construction of double-decked facilities to utilize the best use of the land. She reiterated previously stated concerns regarding noise and air pollution, noting the possible necessity of a reading by the Air Pollution Agency, requested that residents be shielded from parking lot lighting, and that review of potential drainage problems occur prior to surfacing of the lot. Mrs. Vaupel objected to leasing 1.02 acres of city property to the applicant for $900.00 per year, noting that the city is guilty of giving away property which is prohibited by the state constitution. The Examiner advised that lease negotiations are a responsibility of the Board of Public Works and concerns should be addressed to that body. The Examiner requested further comments in support or opposition to the application. There was no response. He then requested final comments from the Planning Department staff. Mr. Blaylock advised the recommendation of the Planning Department that approval of the rezone should be conditioned upon provision of landscaping and berming, but if such condition is not imposed, the department would recommend site plan approval by the Hearing Examiner following completion of final design details. He also suggested that the rezone be conditioned to require reversion to the original zoning if development does not occur within a specified time limit. The Examiner requested further comments. Since there were none, the hearing regarding File No. SP-007-80 was closed by the Examiner at 11:12 a.m. SP-007-80 Page Three Referencing the Examiner's earlier comments regarding provision of a 10-foot setback on the frontage of the property, Mr. Lee questioned the ordinance requirement. The Examiner advised requirements of the Parking and Loading Ordinance which specify a 10- foot front yard setback in the R-4 zone, although he indicated uncertainty of allowable uses in the B-P zone if determined a legal' zoning designation. Mr. Lee advised his opinion that the designation of B-P zoning is based on the premise that the parking facility is an 'accessory use within 500 feet of the structure which it serves. He noted that the Boeing 10.72 Building is located adjacent to and within 500 feet Of the proposed parking lot. He also indicated that .the B-P zone is the least intense rezone possible to recognize the existing use of the lot and allow for necessary improvement which will amount to approximately $400,000 in expenditures. Mr. Lee noted that the value of the land does not amount to twice the cost of the proposed improvements, which may consequently constrain development potential. He advised that the design of the parking. lot, including location of ingress and egress points, is under negotiation, although it has been determined that ingress would be provided from Logan Avenue N. with egress via Burnett Avenue N. The Examiner inquired regarding estimated vehicle trips resulting from employment shifts. Mr. Lee estimated a total of 13,000 vehicles during the main shift with 3,000 to 4,000 vehicles utilizing the lot for the second shift which commences at 3:00 p.m. and ends at 11:00 p.m. The'Examiner requested further testimony in support. Responding was: • Lee Hedin Boeing Commercial Airplane Company . P.O. Box 3707, M/S 62-15 Seattle, WA 98124 Mr. Hedin indicated anticipation that the proposed parking lot would be utilized exclusively by people employed in the adjacent Engineering Building whose shift begins at 8:00 a.m. and ends at 4:30 p.m.', and not by factory workers employed during second shift, due to inconvenient proximity of the parking lot to factory buildings. He also noted the company's intent in redesigning the parking lot to encourage hoeing employees now utilizing residential streets for parking purposes to relocate to the proposed lot which Would decrease walking time and remove congestion from residential streets. Regarding the'Planning Department recommendation for provision of a planting berm or wall, Mr. Hedin requested that the Examiner not include the recommendation as .a condition ' of approval of the rezone. ' He advised that cost estimates had been based upon a reasonable amount of landscaping' in establishing budget funding, and additional improvements proposed by the city May preclude commencement of the project. Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director, clarified the purpose of the recommendation for berming .to create a dense, visual screen as a buffer between residential uses and heavy industrial uses. He •noted that it is not the departmental intent to specify design, but to review alternatives to accomplish the screening objective. He indicated his opinion that inclusion of the requirement is essential, and the only other alternative would be imposition of a condition for site plan review and approval by the Hearing Examiner subsequent to preparation of design plans. Mr. Ericksen.emphasized the importance to the residential community of provision of landscaping and buffering, and reviewed previous projects involving substantial funding by the City of Renton and the federal government for rehabilitation of the housing in the north Renton area to encourage preservation and enhancement of the area as a single family community. He advised that unless .adequate. design measures are taken, the parking use has a definite impact on the residential ,uses which the city should make every effort to preventS The Examiner inquired regarding restrictions of development of a portion of the parking lot located on public right-of-way. Mr. Ericksen advised that it is not unusual for • ,a berm or fencing to extend into the public right-of-way, although structures or walls are not allowed. The' Examiner requested testimony in opposition to the application.. Responding was: Versie Vaupel ' - • 221 Wells Avenue N. ' ' • 'Renton, WA , 98055 ', ' • ' Mrs. Vaupel inquired regarding the exact number of proposed parking stalls. ' Mr._ Blaylock' 'indicated that although a maximum of 400 stalls is allowed, reduction may, occur upon provision of required 5% landscaping and whether a variance is granted for stall length , • and Width by,the -Board of Adjustment. ' The Examiner inquired regarding the, maximum number of stalls allowed without a variance. Mr. Blaylock estimated a reduction of 75 to 100, spaces. Mr. Hedin advised current capacity of 250 stalls in the parking lot. Mrs. . Vaupel noted that she resides in the near vicinity of the proposal, and concerns of .other.homeowners include' impact of vehicle noise and pollution to residents.. She • -007-80 Page Six 5. The subject site has been used for parking for a number of years. The question of its legality was touched on at the hearing. There has been no determination as to its status as a legally non-conforming use. 6. The Comprehensive Plan indicates that the area in which the subject property is located is suitable for high density multifamily uses, although the map element of the Comprehensive Plan indicates that the area is on the boundary between that area and one which is designated as suitable for heavy industry. 7. There are a number of different types of development in the vicinity of the subject property. Directly east of the subject site, the predominant land use is single family residential with some multifamily development scattered amongst the single family uses. The northernmost parcel on the east is zoned L-1 (Light Industry) . North of the subject property, land use is predominantly used, for industrial purposes and associated parking facilities. To the west is a large parking lot operated by the applicant, and just south of the parking lot is the Renton Stadium. 8. The subject site and the property to the east, with the exception of the small L-1 parcel, are a large multiblock area zoned R-4. North and west of the subject property, the zoning district is H-1 (Heavy Industry) with the exception of the parcel containing the Renton Stadium which is zoned P-1 (Public) . 9. The proposed parking area will have capacity for approximately 350 automobiles. The precise number has not been determined because of the imposition of landscaping •requirements, the possibility of site plan changes, and because a variance for a parking stall dimension is pending which could permit more parking. 10. The establishment of a permanent parking facility in this location with facilities for up to 350 automobiles will increase traffic, noise, air pollution, and visual impact on the area. 11. The applicant indicated that the site plan is tentative but that ingress would be via Logan Avenue N. and egress via Burnett Avenue N. The plans include a sidewalk only on the Logan Avenue N. side to lessen the impact on the residential area of patrons walking to work through the residential area. 12. The applicant indicated that most, if not all, use of the parking area will be during the day, although some use of the lot could occur at night. 13. As indicated above, the applicant has leased a portion of the Burnett Avenue N. right-of-way from the city to provide an expanded area for the parking lot. The proposed landscaping and berm would be located on this portion of the subject property. • 14. The Planning Department indicated that considerable amounts of Federal funds have been provided in the area of north Renton to upgrade the existing housing and establish the new Senior Center, and therefore recommended that the parking area provide a planting berm and additional other landscaping to protect these residential areas. The Planning Department also recommended limiting the number of driveways on the Burnett Avenue N. side to two and that approval be limited to redevelopment and occupancy within a reasonable time. CONCLUSIONS: 1. The' proposal to establish a parking lot on the subject property appears acceptable given the location of the subject property, the nature of adjacent uses, and the conditions which will be imposed t'o lessen the impact of the parking lot on the adjacent residential area. While the Comprehensive Plan indicates that the area in which the subject property is located may suitable for high density multifamily dwellings, the map' element also indicates that the subject_ property is just on the furthest edge of the area so designated. The area just west of the subject property •is designated for heavy industrial uses. ' • Logan Avenue N. , forming the boundary between these two areas, is' a heavily traveled thoroughfare providing access to the• large industrial businesseg located north of. the subject property. The establishment of the proposed parking lot is a. more .suitable use of the subject property than is the establishment of multifamily •uses' in this location. -007-80 Page Five • THE FOLLOWING IS THE HEARING EXAMINER'S INTERPRETATION OF THE VALIDITY OF THE B-P ZONE: The present Section 4-715 appears to be an inapplicable holdover of a previous provision requiring parking for new and/or expanding uses. It also provided for those. structures which have undergone renovation or which have undergone a change in use requiring more parking than the former use. • The section (prior to codification of Section 14) was first enacted in 1953 by Ordinance 1472. The section then referred exclusively to providing off-street parking for uses and setting limits and requirements for those uses which are otherwise permitted in the zoning code. The section itself did not designate a permitted use. In 1956, Section 14 'was amended as was the section defining the various use categories. Section 3.12 created a B-P designation for the zoning map. Section 14 created the "so- called" B-P zone which requires that all off-street parking required of uses other than • residential- be in areas zoned B-P. Again, this section itself did not create an independent zoning category.' It was only applicable to parking areas accessory to a principle use. • The City Council ,in 1957 codified the previous ordinances of the City of Renton by ' adoption of Ordinance No. 1628. The codifier then apparently separated in outline • • fashion all those designations which appeared to indicate a type of zoning classification and placed them together. The codifier then placed other requirements further back in the code and separated the first two paragraphs of Section 14 from the actual parking and loading requirements which became Section 4-718 to Title IV of the Code of Renton. The Council then adopted Ordinance No. 2548 in 1970 including Section 4-2214 which purports to repeal Section 4-718 of the zoning code and also repeal's "any and all ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict therewith." This ordinance created the Parking and Loading Ordinance which contains the same and similar language as the original codified section of both Sections 4-715 and 4-718. • The B-P. section of .the code was repealed by this ordinance, especially since it was never intended to designate a separate zoning district separate and apart from a principle use, does not actually define a use district, and as it now reads, cannot reasonably stand alone. Further, independent parking lots serving as the principle use also are' permitted.in the B-1 (Business) zone and all less restrictive zones; therefore, independent parking lots are also provided for in the zoning code. Therefore, it appears that the Parking and Loading Ordinance, Ordinance No. 2548, has amended, replaced and repealed the former B-P zone and the requirements contained therein. • The City Attorney also indicated that the present embodiment Of Section 4-115 as • codified does not establish a zoning category. Having determined that the provisions of the code referring to B-P are inapplicable, the applicant's request would fall within the 'provisions of Section 4-2204.C(1) of the Parking and loading Ordinance. Further, the notice of the application and request, which informed the public of the impending public hearing and the subject to be discussed, to wit, a change .in classification to enable parking to be established on the subject property, was sufficient to enable the Hearing Examiner to proceed under that section which provides that the Examiner may grant a special use permit (Section 4-2204.C(2) ) . SPECIAL PERMIT FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS• & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The subject 'property is located between Logan Avenue N. and Burnett Avenue N.' and between N. 4th Street and N. 6th Street. The site is part of the abandoned • Burlington Northern Railroad right-of-way. • • • 2. The applicant's' proposal, if approved, would also make use of public street right- Of-way granted by the Board of Public Works along the Burnett Street side of the parcel. , • ' 3. The• subject site was part of the original plat of the City of Renton. It was • rezonethfrom R-2 (Duplex Residential; minimum lot size - 7200 square feet) to R-4 (High Density Multifamily) by Ordinance No. '1932, in January, 1962.' • 4. ' The site' is essentially level. The areas which are not presently used for parking are overgrown with shrubs and bushes. 007-80 Page Eight r'. DECISION: The special permit to establish a parking facility on the subject property. is approved subject to the following: 1. The construction of a berm along the eastern edge of the subject property along Burnett Avenue N. running the length of the parking lot with the exception of those areas, limited to no more than two, needed for access. Said berm shall be no less than five feet in width and 42 inches in height. 2. The landscaping of the berm subject to the approval of the Planning Department. 3. The execution of restrictive covenants to provide a landscaped planting area along ' the perimeter of the parking area not covered by Condition No. 1 above, and the provision of internal landscaping to consist of not less than 5% of the remaining area of the parking lot. 4. Site review by the Hearing Examiner after recommendation of the various city • departments pursuant to Section 4-3010.A.6. 5. The special permit shall expire two years from the date of decision if the applicant has not occupied the subject site and not complied with the conditions enumerated above. Further, the special permit shall expire if for any reason the berm is removed, including the expiration of the lease for the property upon which it is constructed. ORDERED THIS 24th day of January, 1980. \(CA.A1 Fred J. Ka an Land Use Hearing Examiner TRANSMITTED THIS 24th day of January, 1980 by Affidavit of Mailing to the parties of record: Rich Kato, 1917 First Avenue, Seattle, WA 98101 Bruce McKay, 241 Factory Avenue N. , Renton, WA 98055 Arthur Lee, 1917 First Avenue, Seattle, WA 98101 Lee Hedin, Boeing Commercial Airplane Company, P.O. 3707, M/S 62-15, Seattle, WA 98124 Paul Ouellette, 1918 Rolling Hills Drive S.E. , Renton, WA 98055 Versie Vaupel, 221 Wells Avenue N. , Renton, WA 98055 TRANSMITTED THIS 24th day of January, 1980 to the following: Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director Michael Hanis, Planning Commission Chairman Ron Nelson, Building Division Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before February 7, 1980. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shallset forth the specific errors relied upon by. such appellant, and the Examiner may, after • review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that, • such appeal be filed with the City Clerk accompanying a filing fee of $25.00 'and meeting' other specified requirements. 'Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection in the Finance.Department, first floor of City Hall, or same may be purchased at cost in . said department. • • 07-80' Page Seven The transition between residential and industrial is generally gradual and the Comprehensive Plan indicates that 'such incompatible land uses should be buffered from each other (Comprehensive Plan, page 17, Objectives 1, 2 and 4) . The proposed parking lot could serve as an effective buffer between the heavy industrial uses and •the residential uses already well established in the area. 2. The predominant land use east of the subject property is single family and this area should be protected from the intrusive and more intense use the applicant is ' proposing. The parking area will be located directly across from this established and flourishing residential neighborhood. There has been considerable reinvestment • in the area recently, in the form of renovation funds and the construction of the • Senior Center along the Cedar River. ' This area should be protected from the more intrusive use the applicant is proposing and the use of appropriate landscape methods can lessen the impact of the parking facility on these residential uses. • 3. The Planning Department has recommended that the eastern residential properties be screened by the construction ,of a berm on the eastern edge of the proposed parking facility and by planting trees and shrubs in this area. The Planning Department also indicated the number of driveways on the Burnett Avenue N. side . of the parking lot be limited to two. There 'are a number of shifts at The Boeing Company, and therefore, the use of the parking lot will occur during early morning and late afternoon hours when the headlights of cars parked facing east and also exiting the lot will have a tendency to shine into the residences across Burnett and disturb the occupants. Landscaping would only provide a limited screen but a more effective screen could be'provided by the construction of a berm along the eastern edge.of the parking lot as recommended by the 'Planning Department. • This berm would also abate the visual impact and the impacts of noise and air pollution. The Planning Director indicated that the berm method would be the most satisfactory approach. 4. At the same time, the traffic will exit the lot onto Burnett, according to the applicant's plan, thereby further impacting residents. The Planning Department recommended' that the number of exits. on the Burnett Avenue side be limited to two instead of the three proposed. The best alternative would be to eliminate any driveway on the east onto Burnett, but because of the traffic .patterns and the lane configuration of Logan Avenue N. , this may not be possible. The Traffic. Engineering Division should be consulted, and access should be eliminated if possible. • 5. Landscaping of this 'parking lot is particularly important since it is located in a residential zone and is designated for residential purposes in the Comprehensive Plan. 'To provide the type of buffer which will protect the residential district • from unwarranted infiltration (Comprehensive Plan, page 17, Objective 1) and to ' increase community livability by improving environmental factors (Comprehensive Plan, page 17; Objective 2) , the applicant should be required to execute covenants to install and maintain the landscaping and irrigation which is ultimately required by a site plan review. The covenants will avoid the possibility of ' variances being issued which could modify ,any part of the unified landscaping/ berm plan which provides the visual and physical buffer needed to assure the proposal's compatibility with both the Comprehensive 'Plan and the actual area and neighborhood in question. • • 6. The area in which the berm is to be located presents a unique situation because it is located on city right-of-way and the applicant cannot execute' covenants • nor actually guarantee that the parcel will not be later needed by the city for road purposes. Because of this uncertainty, the use of the subject property'for parking purposes should be conditioned on the creation and retention of the berm; arid the special permit ,to allow the establishment of this parking area should terminate if the land upon which the berm ,is constructed is removed from the parking facility. ' . • . 7. To assure the total integration of the proposal into the area and provide the . necessary detail for .comprehensive review, the proposal should be reviewed in a public hearing pursuant to Section 4-3010.A.6 (Site Plan.Review) after consideration and recommendations by the various city departments. PLANNING' DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY" REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: BOEING COMPANY, File No : R-455-79 January 15 , 1980 Page Two 4. Wildlife: Little or no vegetation remains that could be considered suitable for wildlife habitat . 5 . Water:. No surface water was observed on the subject site . 6. Land Use : The site is presently utilized as a parking lot by the applicant . E. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACERTISTICS : The surrounding properties are a combination of industrial , multiple family and single family land uses . F. PUBLIC SERVICES : 1 . Water and Sewer: The Metro gravity sewer runs north-south along Logan Avenue North adjacent to the subject site and a 6" water main extends east-west on North 4th Street at the southerly border. 2 . Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Department per ordinance requirements . 3. Transit : Several Metro Transit routes operate along Park Avenue North within Z mile to the east of the subject site . 4. Schools : Not Applicable. 5 . Recreation : Not Applicable. G. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE : 1. Section 4-709B; R-4 , Residence Multiple Family. 2. Section 4-715 ; B-P , Off-Street Parking. H. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT: 1 . Comprehensive Plan, Land Use Report , 1965 , Objectives , page 17. 2 . Renton Urban Area Comprehensive Plan, 1965 . I . IMPACT ON THE NATURAL OR HUMAN ENVIRONMENT: 1. Natural Systems : Rezoning of the subject property will not directly impact the site. However, paving and improvement of the site will enlarge the amount of impervious surface and thereby increase storm water runoff. Proper drainage controls land facilities can mitigate this , however. 2. Population/Employment : The nature of the use is such that there isn' t likely to by any significant effect on employment while the population flow may increase slightly with the additional parking stalls provided. 3. Schools : Not Applicable. 4. Social : Not Applicable. 5. Traffic: See discussion under L-6 . RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER JAN151980 PLANNING DEPARTMENT AM PM PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER 7,819110111r12r1r2r3r4r5r6 PUBLIC HEARING e JANUARY 15, 1980 EXHIBIT NO. / APPLICANT: BOEING COMPANY ITEM NO.FILE NUMBER: R-455-79 ��� `�q A. SUMMARY & PURPOSE OF REQUEST: The applicant seeks a rezone of the subject site from R-4 to B-P to allow for major improvement and partial expansion of the existing parking' facilities. B. GENERAL .INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record: BOEING COMPANY 2. Applicant : BOEING COMPANY 3. Location : West side of Logan Avenue North (Vicinity Map Attached) between N. 4th Street and N. 6th Street 4. Legal Description : A detailed legal description is available on file. in .the..Renton Planning Department 5. Size of Property : ±2. 82 acres 6. Access : Via Logan Avenue North 7. Existing Zoning: R--4, Residence Multiple Family; minimum lot size 5,000 square feet 8. Existing Zoning in the Area: R-4; P-1, Public Use; H-1 , Heavy Industry; L-1 , Light Industry • 9. Comprehensive Land Use Plan : High Density Multiple Family 10. Notification : The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date. Notice was properly published in the Record Chronicle on January 4, 1980 and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City Ordinance on January 3, 1980. C. HISTORY/BACKGROUND: The subject site is part of the original plat of the City of Renton. It was rezoned from R-2 to R-4 by Ordinance #1932 dated January 1 , 1962 . D. PHYSICAL BACKGROUND: 1 . Topography : The site is essentially level . 2 . Soils : Urban Land (Ur) . The erosion hazard is slight to moderate . No capability or woodland classification . 3. Vegetation : Most of the subject site has been cleared and graded and the existing vegetation consists of scrub brush and blackberries along the western and southern perimeters . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: BOEING COMPANY, File No: R-455-79 January 15, 1980 Page Four 8. The parking lot will have a traffic, noise, air pollution and visual impact on the adjacent residential properties 'to the east . The extent of such impact can be mitigated through proper design and access control. Provision of adequate landscaping for screening and buffering purposes is essential. The five feet of landscaping as required by ordinance does not appear adequate to create a berm unless a retaining wall is utilized with the berm facing the residential area to the east . M. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION: Based on the- above analysis, it is recommended that the Hearing Examiner recommend approval of the rezone request , File Number R-455-79 , from R-4, Multi-Family Residential , to B-P , Business Parking with the following conditions : 1. Provision by the applicant of detailed landscaping plans to include: ( a) a planting berm or wall with landscape materials to create a dense visual screen along the Burnett Avenue North frontage, (b) a landscaped planter along all other street frontages as required by the Parking and Loading Ordinance, and (c) a minimum of 5% internal landscaping as required by the Parking and Loading Ordinance Section 4-2203(8) (B) ( 3) . 2 . Landscape plans shall be submitted prior to issuance of building permit and subject to review and approval of the Planning Department . 3. Redesign of proposed parking layout subject to review and approval of the Planning Department and Traffic Engineering Division to emphasize the use of Logan Avenue North for ingress and egress and de-emphasize use of Burnett . 4 . Vehicular access to Burnett Avenue North shall be limited to two points of ingress and egress in order to reduce impact to adjacent residential uses . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: BOEING COMPANY, File No: R-455-79 January 15, 1980 Page Three J. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION: Pursuant to the City of Renton' s Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended, RCW 43-21C, a declaration of non-significance has been issued by the responsible official . K. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED: 1. City of Renton Building Division 2. City of Renton Engineering Division 3. City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division 4. City of Renton Utilities Division 5. ' City of Renton Fire Department L. PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1 . Although the proposed use does not conform with the Comprehensive Plan designation of High Density Multiple Family for the subject site, it can be considered consistent with multiple family uses. The existing land use to the east of Burnett Avenue North is predominately single family residential with some scattered 'multiple family residential. 2. ' The subject property has retained the same R-4 zoning since 1962 . This would appear to demonstrate that the designation has not been specifically considered in previous area zoning . or land use analysis (Section 4-3014-A other than the Renton , Urban Area Comprehensive Plan adopted in 1965) . 3. The B-P Business Parking District is a special destrict ' designed for auxiliary parking. The zone was not originally . in the 1953 Zoning Ordinance. In 1958, Ordinance #1542 specifically created the B-P Zone by amending Section XIV- Parking and Loading-Space Requirements. Ordinance #2548 in March of 1970 developed more specific standards; however, it repealed sections in conflict but it did not repeal the intent of the B-P Zone. The change which occurred with the codification was a result of an apparent error made in codi- fying Ordinance #3050. This ordinance did not repeal the B-P Zone, but the codifier eliminated the entire section and replaced it with the amendment . 4. The Utilities Engineering Division indicates that a water main will be required on Logan Avenue North, Also, if water is required for on-site irrigation system development charges of . 01/square foot will also apply. 5. The Engineering Division advises that curbs, gutters, side- walks, and street paving are required on the east side of Logan Avenue North. Curbs and gutters are necessary on the west side of Burnett Avenue North and, Logan Avenue North has to be widened on the west side. 6. The increased traffic flow generated by the additional parking space will impact at peak hours the intersection of Logan Avenue North and North 6th Street . Traffic Engineering notes that periodic complaints are received regarding this, location. The present signal controller equipment is outdated and the overhead traffic signal cables are weathered causing intersection control malfunctions. Traffic states that a new traffic signal controller and undergrounding of cables and detectors will cost an estimated $60,000. 7. A variance application has been submitted t the Building Divi- sion by the applicant regarding aislef and length. The request is.to reduce the required aisle width of 24 ' to 20 ' and the required length from 20 ' to 18' . This is sched- uled to-be heard by the Board of Adjustment on Jan. 17 , 1980 . . • :a � ' —rt.. Y • >. ,.. ,:r „ i.•' _ '/" ' • F{ ' i 'J — �iJ i; I' - j 1 1 �{ :i • ,+ t I / II —�1-- �� -� — _.?'� 'i'' 'J-'If •• I • 0/ /� 9 '\ ''tom '. L - .. ..... - J #t�ilfPQ4"_s t+i''"! •WW1' 11i�,74�'°.0 "K} 'C P+1. y.+ �'Yi l ��..�::.J a E'.�!!_'�'�i1�IHi1Bti NNW ���!�I !Sa o•N. 'rn I• / ._ ,___ 1 A� ! >•sp■J �: t■�K~11�1■0'�1( I"_!'�j�Iil _-�'rsrr`•S�1r•'rrt• �> :^ I° rt :� �ifAieil• � M f Y_l 1! :•:h;�.,'`1�.•,.'..;:�•:� r�\ i I , I�+ ■seeclo� aft�ie ■r■Mr�or1■�r�w;rr• . r/•;4 I.I, ■� •�■� WEI1 16■■a:J■ 7IM■MR7� R . A. .l��YrMtO�!ir,w -■� ■R - r •i••••rs':r 11 �.r.a... ,-2'-- -- ilk :�i•':'�'''••y.:'••v' 1' it i ., nr • '\•, , MSYYiI!p�I/V■111■ ■ll>•1gVINIPI :�• • •%'ii` ,�� •t 1'I •sa ■.• .- ►�lMeal erg■ a.<^:. iy 'Y` ' ' • !�■ ■!■!1 i I ' -,ram, , f: . �' 1. i..ti r •ter ,.�`� LLLE1 P "/ „4'1 -'-, ,,r• , r. l , • ..::::,..;:p - ..,- ° • l ✓ � i / ' � y . n ,,, fr6,....4nr-ri—7,4- ;,i ... far i li:•":•;// ,,....: ..,:...; 'N.*. '`'••• ••! 41...'":1—.—,••-•....1:.1, , . ... 2 . s- __„•. . ,/ 1 ‘, a'i :pp ' rAfiai.g. ;- /p.,.-r, )317---;,)• .'.1,1,.. ky,;. ,0.. •.,* ' • ./ ,` 1 "=' •i . CI\ ' 7\ 1; I , \ i � , 3r° . 4_i.%: , • 5, Y i 1 1 1 i N. ••i 7,`. II' ,':, r ii\;A, !I .1• E.,:... :r,,,„ i 1 q 1• ` �S iL•_,{'3.)r'_ --.'.� : J�1 Y 1 'y�' ^i C1l J .2 .., t 4.... a -tu r%�Q "GkbA RI✓i6 / !'N3i+ ,At1 e ,...,_,..i . ...e.i. „LI ,, : 41. -,-. 41 �s =- - I — - td %;? 1,.Y i \ 1;I 2,::.:i. 1 p �,� '1..li'I ter. 'I_' --'Cy-••.. . ;: \ ,, al1 0 i �ojeir,r7 a �f aL— 1 I}.; `, i •. .t\\ ....•VJ '� ■a■o■��j 3 .. ,u„• _ium "'�=+u�84ro_'uJ-..�•lil� \ $ + 1`LINT'I i...:' .[i Imo}.,},..••'•>, `•••- r 1 .▪ 4111*,.. ',4 �1'40lR +"�-t4OR --iPM• .:ZG1 1.,•,-'At •I ,�� .."" 3•'i•4- Q°. QV F ,7_ -- —_ —_:Ili,-.. •11 •kk t.11111 •I.•- a` 1' • $ Jt1 � i:.-.�' u'4 I1-J � "11 • -)? . I ' ' ,� I 1 i aI . ; I° ` � '`, yam-,: `.. `: :t'r : ='-I. *., �., . • ' ., i . lit°.1 _I, .. - v;ac ' i - —.q.iT'•• _.,..,... -_ ` _;-1.e ---, • S t. :, _ r,, J.� � L..'_ L 11 ,i —.- . .I .T.71,7--,---__...-. .-.1,,,,4 ,_. 1 .,.._. . • .. • ,.., . ., • • • F:r:.. 511141- rAN1LYIzE6. FA `n 1 L..:a,i 11- %. t;i • ,. ,`.� `� ;"'—° 11� •'I'•= IF.__'_ 1. " - �• �=,'..,.K •� • +p`,: • 1 • I l�j:Ctai� ,II /jriAri'rA11lL IZE5. . ;:: ,.,I-- yI d j•- - .-,,;, ....-1, � .`"%r � 'J': _▪ • )L ;: ,' • • r, I,ti;;., �_.,,-_' • / ^may t ' . .L• •; ;_1 a PUl3LlG OPE/1 AGE 'F;:� i ;\;'r-1.";:� I =�1 4 '� `I I,- �•�'� •••,.%� `°�Y' � 1 t:.' �J i'.,L, C{ •,1 ' 4 J 't I •yrr,• °� •� \N ; _.,�L•,, I A I I t5 i �.�-L� • - -E�• 1 "•"'�,' • i i• I ?_�•'J `•.!�.�'+}.r._.-. -. ! y :C,s l� l L .I---- -�:J • •lw, �'L,rL?.; t•°`;�i''tr'=J:!,i�:.`�t.7. I•1 •I :1 '•a'��' ;J-:)` ! • • -�— _ 7. T:al� �IC�UaE Z- VIG/d/TY LAIYt7U5E �.I' T; l .L_�!:.1. 11 ftr-•:' 1. „ -'• 1. , THIS DRAI•IIiNG REDUCED TO ;\ ' '- .\1 ., 1_�.tl-. .:al',rT-' �. -j. —.1 • "•-•_]• s' '' ONE-THIRD SIZE„ yS ' 14`_� '.s:-.4 1'j- ;` 5 !.• <r x 'l-._4 /. �,., t', ' y �. ., sf y �'x• 4 •4,,'• �+ 'hd ia'`��GVaiklYi" P..;, '1,-..lti•-`.� 3�'l,,,i,.`da}..1,''. ,7v ::7 0,0i ''. ' 3--1 ',izyt ei 7:4.,` s�.Y.it4 idlit 1!`". ,.! , •'Y5`, „r•..'t: :r • . ',,,,,,,A. N • • 1_, /\\ i i 1 ! t „, -- 5 rrr F Q _ a i I 30 1 i / LI% :L-7:1\/R ill. fe. / t �;-�a_ sT. Lw.a?.le+c� .n — Wiz--'-1:11 6 �I 0\ A 1 4- n ,, j �` 0ry�r m ��y ) y WT 1. PACIFIC CA2\-`R r, A\ k 111 !"'•"^ '4\: '', 6 anal R'l 7 tw7a FOIJ IVDZV CO Ho �1' '1%.-- fir IL" . ,Q.�jl�s• n.tx. �-�mY�}/i e` ; l s7A0/UM / vi•vi .4"11 Ig� 1. . 67 {'ii ® r c. ! ,\ --T- /iY '�®H 5, ��..,w»`•G7�' ..'.=C�yy�j �ry t. q..,. ,� �.Tw ''„i' I1 I e``t e ‘ : ,, /�19iJ r���� tis EA f41 ti ti• 4;1 /�,�� / \ \\ \ /1 0 / 1...iic,„ .. 7.-tit El,-al We . ;Z tTINNIESCArt ,.., '--1,,b,, 40 4 '...,. ,,,.:,,Fq-.'r I t, • i SU �7 t \ '\ L .2 _ ,...... ,,,,ps r...i.,,,-. MI 111221111.361111.111k37.1": tI o , , ,'EMI MI ��,-'n , ' n'C AN'''' '' // $11. is-'612-4.• , ',$, ,•,',f,m. /A i.u.--'--"'", A/ / ', fc.. , 13.1 „. =,,,, .. a,,„ ,,4,, .. 7_,.._0 . I Y o I, i r*+r L -�• r s Y.,:� ,� '-:--1-1.!1-0 I © \ /�- 6 i 413 "zi r {` r . ' ' / - gi }I f iA T". ,TT, _ '- -,- _ --_ _J "�" + \ t - '�� / `lC ,., E ,. �!} 71i ...-� r -�T—� .� r s.ioa 7 */ µ�- 1 6 se Y:` ti - 1 -U_ 1 _ 1Q 1Lh - Q ;`t „ ,. r. , + Y_I C°''9 I i3' __. � o \),.y." •,`,,. /.' / O�.'.. pot-, 1 , , k. f SH GINR JM?, t , .'.iala'`.t . on �r " . .;',$. j J' '� ® � \ w,,,, 5...04 sc,roor_ 51,7-=,.117� ' i„trae . :y0a �,-, FF77 s ---tll' ilin>11•lam ' M,0 2- ....,6pri.,,,,, , ---_-„r,_____:_--,________ ,_.___ : ________,, ,.. , i _ , . .:.4,,,...„,,„ 1m _,> d' :W4,11,.....LIPI". Fr.'1 „..,..*"- ,,,,, •-, 7` 1' -..) a L _,4,- :. ,ffl >1.--*44", I - LLB ,n.1,1, -� r d:i40 �� / "'" \ / �_.3t �, 1 .�A � 3no ,.,E G' -- `'\" $ r. s .'. . I, ` �, _, 1 . �-• �. /Fig Meiji Ism ri. • O w ?p\N6 ,_ �7 4` ta }, moo' -Rill W' \�^ zs ! [, �- 'i P`..'� .,• f 't:" .r"�«,� III lriz. jj 1": -;_.4„.-_ •1p S {� �t i...` *,-J.- I = ..a- .hrh.,p ,7' �� $'• 6 �e 7 \....y :..:--�� ,tl li e g� I Z. l '^ F 5 zr-I i i,. •• 11 1 -Oa H• . t {� 'I I \� . , ti� F , '�q;Qa-1-1'.�i. ' III I -', at' u \,*. fj f i�.!"3�C�h^-•••-^'.u�.'C.Z7'a'.1.'�..acSJ:aw'Grr.Y�SsePra-...S-""_.�'t^.Y:1Ses��t;xu::.r.¢naLa.;.nam.�,z^'^�..•.r.T:<:0:11v'tte::s-,rF.:x.'i.t�r.n.m:c.•c,t:-�.,r..aa c:=v:C:.rS.u.�:ru.:.am:r.:s.tL2tii,nt�y.'^•.,,». .. _ +.«.. ".... ,".-..,,. I 1 ri BOEING COMPANY R-455-79 I , I •,". _. ..nM.- .-Yam «: -�.� . m, �, �..,........,.... " �� BOEING COMPANY � 1 APPLICANT TOTAL AREA ±2. 82 acres I , 'i PRINCIPAL ACCESS Via Logan Avenue North t 1 1 EXISTING ZONING R-4, Residential Multiple Family • EXISTING USE Presently utilized as a parking lot Parking • lot with major improvement and PROPOSED USE J p proposed expansion COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN High Density Multiple Family } COMMENTS . % 1 1 1 1 • IL6Aw 4H,µ _ ran...1 L'.1 `- E'gure .1,: Conceptual P1 an /7/___1_ -r H_1.1._____H_ l_ ., 1 7-,, •-•:-.-,......„ -----____ • / erawr.,e rrA,r e �� / : -. ...' // _ _� _-- euR.rSrr ay.?.w K-- . • n r t 1 1-'\-�'^ ��-_ we..A..ew �eeM vE�;sc. c.:.,xr..:..r m i c.7...:...." r,' -- a 1 i `�fr ! �� .11 ' 1 r ro-eria sa:1(uan..c1 Ili /�� - ' _d 11 L• (1 I l r -- E • Y -._.zrz _L 1 , _�` °-\ °` t,ta 'f7r r 11 r r 1 '.'�\,C C C <,\ \�,\ \`�'.�\ \ ��I Z�J j s :Of Aft^wig • r I I l r l I 1 ` \�\�v � I_� i i i 1 ` I.:A•e.�rcf • . -I-,--,--, 1 1 1 Ft 1 i l i i I I I ! 1 I II { j + real,,,?K - .t-I i i i �� i. 111'� ( I 1 i l l l l (I t 11 �1 i�I�11 I I I 11 ! ! /I I r 1 11 J i CJaf Y Cut. ' ! .0,re3.fccs(tntrvwa) .• • ..• •• ...* ' a _..I Ia T_I B. I I III I • L THIS DRAWING HAS BEEN REDUCED • IiiJ I i -t f V03C I oueksrr A.f..r t I • • --_.— •w .— ..��,......:.�w..... wxmA ma ®a cce.r q.-.. :-.. ... ...-.. J �an.4. ...Mom,7;'[ - `-{jI I• I(-- �IFlf1S�• ,�••.• p n�■IrfmA .' : ;'rasa ^t --._�t�- I - __— tr CiLMO.....Ie1 GI C 11r11fOA,00. M `— - 1 "f —t _�- ❑ IurnS.ea �_ HOEING �i£4�N PALiK1NG LOT ail ^� r i /R/077/79 - , ' Renton Planning Department` DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application i = 24 A Y a7) 1//e /9 ir. 1'k4 firm Mt ��0ar? a/eA nc'iwi 0-e` ie CXBS?ti°IA ariceit '�c/./i i2-5. Location : Sde .0 �r ve. /V1 41� eii , f e $$ Applicant : 8be('irt q e®.61n1ea.Ay _ _ r CJ 1 TO : Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE :_ //S/ ® Police Department A, R, C, MEETING 'S Public Works Department Engineering Division _ Traffic Engineering ,Buil,-Ading Division ® \ 'Utilities Engineering ts. �EC�. 11) i. Fire Department ,JO la 1930 o����f,=N SS OR.'S�IGG=ST.ItONS R GARI)I 1G CIS A�'PIIAIC.AT OP SHOD` ° `J' r \\ D IN 'llITING FOr; 1HE APPLICATIO�� �ZEVI W CONFERENCE (ARC) OIMPLIJ ON _ Al 9:00 AM IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROUT'L IF YOUR DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT BE ABLE TO N ATT THE ' ARC, PLEASE PROVIDE THE. COMMENTS TO THE FLANNING DEPARTMENT BY D: UO PM ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : ,, ,-1 ,c E, D'a p 4- / !`, ` Approved Approved with conditions Not Approved CO1\J CI' INN > A Tr Cr.) 1 ? � :` rg,la ,�,� .s� 9 .s I ',.. IL.-----,..., \,,. ..; \ ' --,._,., ' /2. . ",:! 7 . ";;-' ?y, Signature of Uir'ector or Authorized Representative • r Date REVIEWING' DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 0/G/ T11 CCPTelpproved '✓ Approved with conditions Not Approved a - CIPL 71' 016- 1-/- el- '"4/+t:. . .o-� ilk A an a-,, a( - iry . - of 7SQ Fr s),s inv. C/J4re6e.= AAr-a( ' /&__ nefut&0-0( . l' 1/7) (/ I 1 gzat____ i /.3/7 - 7 1 gna Aire-of Di rector or Author i zed Representative -i Date l 1 I ic/c'f//7 . enton Planning Departmen , DEVELOPMEidT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ' Application : rr tfiliorn 'eme►\t & rieie- eX ez4</On'i 0-e7Ae ex,s',rl OQrLd!'rt Ca°/e'l e'S. Location : z ° 5/d6P of fezpi ilve, / ? °e4 94Y f x Applicant : 8ceiltj CoitAy I TO : Parks Department P SCHEDULED FLARING DATE :°_ ///rs00 Police Department A, R. C. MEETING //3/o • Public Works Department , Engineering Division --�:-^ Traffic Engineering* lit›h`.„, • Building Division ;, n . i11 d'0 1��,r�� Utilities Engineering ; q.,. 1 Fire Department �.e4 �' G D PA__ ." • NWITsGRO! TPLCA INEEIS FEEN SHOULD EOEL OI � INF THEAITO VId CONRC: (AC) _D ON AT 9 THE TIRD tNFE ROOIV,a I F YOUR DEPARTMENT/DIVISION° R�EPR ESErNTAT I VE��WILLF NOT�BEOAB LEETO� ATTM(UGTHEE ARC, PLEASE PROVIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE VLANNING DEPARTMENT BY PM ON ' REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: - % =)- ,/r fc 2 i�-/ e-�, - •- k- APproved _. Approved with conditions Not Approved /14-/> :)c 71 a/ /e- -a 4 lam,G(t-_.S C` ; ( �` __,5 % 7' y-Gh/_:,,,�/<<. , --J c-- G 7/1L-G jS F, i e. .S„✓r-'c /,L!c^ / c-, ¢G...<' �! ri"L-.... . z cc I h,L c 1 j 1.1ec c/ '--? C- , c <-'(-S ( L ) -•,=l ,-) 1/c. /C -, ,p i,,t S J — - C`Z.;�'_``_'� � ' `G /f 7 (-2 -t, //- )/ .; Signature of Director or Authorized Re resentative Date V J TM _ /D SION ° C, r1p o •o d-- • ' h con i ions No App-rove L_______2› / -/- 6 f �e /�-,�e'S.��� .-�/��r�. <. ram,/ -,,-- _c•y,L)//'iz,<__ - , ,e,e( 4 c/v 1,' d >>lc( 71t ;. l.-:,'c ,-//c- 'jc/ 7Y )f¢/c 5<fi,..,,/1 l , 4,4 �/pp / '/ J c7�'-la /3e. .- Ire.,' .'--e e A.,e) ,�, -r<- '7(IP 1" '( c2 y S`'c f,, 2 e,;4'?"-�/ -5''" •j c-2 cl- • -' rktL /A)l'1�/'.�1, S h/� d2 ��) '��T"1�c i tr._i' ^J c-; T" Y'.. /1.2 21"--- ; �G--.. W`-1 cl e'9- 71 c-_ �E �-<j G / 1 c f%/ c -- c/ II CA- 7" j ice c' c ( e----S 1.3 --'.S f i e cc 12 e c l - e-• CO 57, - 6�, (;00 , /-11.21, , /06,AL L.� j/ Ji$v6, ;Vi--t / 6;i' .......): 1L -l��r� l.v5i �:/'ci `/(= L. ,,;,„).V ,; /•�,�67" -i.fir 7;:/3 F�"/ f=4.-6 WA'Q's_ c. 1-� /I '.< 5/-c T 1 u' Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date ile-7''d 1 . 1 - /4477/7? • enton Planning Department DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application : E. ir&- �, � 0 n 1/7/2 d ' i'rzg �® r-- ��r9 b��ycni e,✓i"-1' "�&rl'i°ci e Loin cfe- k Cox►.s.°n _ ca r/cant Location : ® 4 a 4e. ,4 .16, '' Applicant : Soeg011 (104440,141 -- TO : Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DINE: f/00 . Police Department A. Re C. MEETING__4/4WQ Public Works Department Engineering Division �1 Traic EngEngineeringEC�UEQ o • Building Division JAN 101F:0 Utilities Engineering p--------------------- Fire Department /� , DEP �v�r ®f.���E�i T�PdGRF�f�Cl�FT�11 hLIC�TILi�,{�EV���l�SCOVFk(����IOPJJ SHOULD ;�� PROVIDED CE (ARC) FLOORIRD T 0 3_ I IELI) ON NOUN. I F YOUR DEPARTMEN�D I V I S I ON RAT EPR ESE AM fNTATHE I VE�IWJ LL N BE()ABLE�TO� AlTN TM:. ARC) PLEASE PROVIDE THE. COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5:UG Phi ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : l �� /.)�. , �-� Approved Approved with conditions Not Approved ..cm.::-A-0-c ) /2-2/ ) / Signa : of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: 6, 7, tov Appproved /% Approved with conditions _ Not Approved q m•2 4,s s Li -✓a /Xs) L �v I v-Z u r v-es� �-� cz S "F 5 i C7-e._ Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date - . • • MM./FINAL LARAT I ON OF mmli m ,3N•-S I GN I F I CANOE Application No . R-454-79 PROPOSED' Declaration Environmental Checklist No. ECF-529-79 ` ' FINAL Declaration Description of proposal APPLICANT SEEKS APPROVAL OF A REZONE FROM GS-1 TO R-2 FOR THE PURPOSE OF FUTURE MULTIPLE FAMILY Proponent CHARLES A CRAMPS ' NORTH SIDE OF SUNSET BLVD. N.E. APPROX. 170 FEET EAST OF Location of Proposal NEWPORT AVENUE N,E, Lead Agency CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT This proposal has been determined to 0 have , not hL.ve a significant adverse impact upon the environment :'` n EIS 0 is is not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 (2 ) (c ) . This decision was ma'e after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency . NON Reasons for declaration of environmentalAsignificance : (1) THE PROPOSAL COMPLIES WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (2) THE LOW DENSITY MULTIPLE FAMILY ZONE PROVIDES A BUFFER BETWEEN THE ESTABLISHED SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL" AREA TO THE NORTH AND SUNSET BLVD. N.E. Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate ' the environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a final ) declaration of non-significance : ' Responsible Offi ial DAVID R. CLEMENS Title SENIOR CANNER Date JANUARY 14, 1980 Signature (/'-' ,/7--7 City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 • • • r '� Wi.:',7441V. FINAL ;LARATION OF erAgNAI0kRia N-SIGNIFICANCE Application No . R-455-79 ® PROPOSED Declaration Environmental Checklist No . ECF-530-79 FINAL Declaration Description of proposal Applicant seeks a rezone of the subject site from R-4 to B-P to allow for major improvement and partial expansion of the existing parking facilities . Proponent BOEING COMPANY West side of Logan Avenue North between North 4th and . Location of Proposal North 6th Streets Lead Agency CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT This proposal has been determined to 0 have not have a significant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS 0 is is not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 ( 2 ) (c ) . This decision was m •= after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency . Reasons for declaration of environmental significance : ( 1) The proposed rezone would slow the redevelopment of an existing non-conforming parking area and eliminate the present non-conforming use, ( 2) the redevelopment of said site will require compliance with the Parking & Loading Ordinance including the provision of landscape screening and access control , and ( 3) proposed improvements will provide a limited landscaped buffer between the existing industrial and residential uses . Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a (,,NIA11.0.0 i/final ) declaration of non-significance : Responsible Official GORDON Y. ERICKSEN Title Plann ' ng Director Data January 11 , 1980 Signature City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 • a A f' PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: BOEING COMPANY, File No : R-455-79 January 15 , 1980 Page Two 4. Wildlife: Little or no vegetation remains that could be considered suitable for wildlife habitat . 5. Water: No surface water was observed on the subject site . 6 . Land Use : The site is presently utilized as a parking lot by the applicant . E. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACERTISTICS : The surrounding properties are a combination of industrial , multiple family and single family land uses . F. PUBLIC SERVICES : 1. Water and Sewer : The Metro gravity sewer runs north-south along Logan Avenue North adjacent to the subject site and a 6" water main extends east-west on North 4th Street at the southerly border. 2. Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Department per ordinance requirements . 3. Transit : Several Metro Transit routes operate along Park Avenue North within 2 mile to the east of the subject site . 4. Schools : Not Applicable. 5. Recreation : Not Applicable. G. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE : 1. Section 4-709B; R-4 , Residence Multiple Family. 2. Section 4-715; B-P, Off-Street Parking. H. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT: 1. Comprehensive Plan, Land Use Report , 1965 , Objectivesq; page 17. 2. Renton Urban Area Comprehensive Plan, 1965 . I . IMPACT ON THE NATURAL OR HUMAN ENVIRONMENT: 1. Natural Systems : Rezoning of the subJect property will not directly impact the site. However, paving and improvement of the site will enlarge the amount of impervious surface and thereby increase storm water runoff . Proper drainage controls land facilities can mitigate this , however. 2. Population/Employment : The nature of the use is such that there isn' t likely to by any significant effect on employment while the population flow may increase slightly with the additional parking stalls provided. 3. Schools : Not Applicable. 4. Social : Not Applicable. 5. Traffic: See discussion under L-6. PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING JANUARY 15, 1980 APPLICANT: BOEING COMPANY FILE NUMBER: R-455-79 A. SUMMARY & PURPOSE OF REQUEST: The applicant seeks a rezone of the subject site from R-4 to B-P to allow for major improvement and partial expansion of the existing parking facilities. B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record: BOEING COMPANY 2. Applicant : BOEING COMPANY 3. Location: West side of Logan Avenue North (Vicinity Map Attached) between N. 4th Street and N. 6th Street 4. Legal Description : A detailed legal description is available on file: in . the...Renton Planning Department 5. Size of Property : ±2. 82 acres 6. Access : Via Logan Avenue North 7. Existing Zoning: R-4, Residence Multiple Family; minimum lot size 5 ,000 square feet 8. Existing Zoning in the Area: R-4; P-1 , Public Use; H-1, Heavy Industry; L-1 , Light Industry 9. Comprehensive Land Use Plan : High Density Multiple Family 10. Nctification : The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date. Notice was properly published in the Record Chronicle on January 4, 1980 and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City Ordinance on January 3, 1980. C. HISTORY/BACKGROUND: The subject site is part of the original plat of the City of Renton. It was ' rezoned from R-2 to R-4 by Ordinance #1932 dated January 1, 1962 . D. PHYSICAL BACKGROUND: 1. Topography: The site is essentially level . 2 . Soils : Urban Land (Ur) . The erosion hazard is slight to moderate. No capability or woodland classification . 3. Vegetation : Most of the subject site has been cleared and graded and the existing vegetation consists of scrub brush and blackberries along the western and southern perimeters . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: BOEING COMPANY, File No : R-455-79 January 15, 1980 Page Four 8. The parking lot will have a traffic, noise, air pollution and visual impact on the adjacent residential properties •to the east . The extent of such impact can be mitigated through proper design and access control. Provision of adequate landscaping for screening and buffering purposes is essential. The five feet of landscaping as required by orainance does not appear adequate to create a berm unless a retaining wall is utilized with the berm facing the residential area to the east . M. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION: Based on the above analysis, it is recommended that the Hearing Examiner recommend approval of the rezone request , File Number R-455-79, from R-4, Multi-Family Residential , to B-P, Business Parking with the following conditions : 1. Provision by the applicant of detailed landscaping plans to include: ( a) a planting berm or wall with landscape materials to create a dense visual screen along the Burnett Avenue North frontage, (b) a landscaped planter along all other street frontages as required by the Parking and Loading Ordinance , and ( c) a minimum of 5% internal landscaping as required by the Parking and Loading Ordinance Section 4-2203( 8) (B) ( 3) . 2. Landscape plans shall be submitted prior • to issuance of building permit and subject to review and approval of the Planning Department . 3. Redesign of proposed parking layout subject to review and approval of the Planning Department and Traffic Engineering Division to emphasize the use of Logan Avenue North for ingress and egress and de-emphasize use of Burnett .. 4. Vehicular access to Burnett Avenue North shall be , limited to two points of ingress and egress in order to reduce impact to adjacent residential uses . • • PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: BOEING COMPANY, File No: R-455-79 January' 15, 1980 Page Three J. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION: Pursuant to the City of Renton' s Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended, RCW 43-21C, a 'declaration of non-significance has been issued by the responsible official. K. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED: 1. City of Renton Building Division 2. City of Renton Engineering Division 3. City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division 4. City of Renton Utilities Division 5. City of Renton Fire Department L. PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1. Although the proposed use does not conform with the Comprehensive Plan designation of High Density Multiple Family for the subject site, it can be considered consistent with multiple family uses . The existing land use to the east of Burnett Avenue North is predominately single family residential with some scattered multiple family residential. 2. The subject property has retained the same R-4 zoning since 1962 . This would appear to demonstrate that the designation has not been specifically considered in previous area zoning or land use analysis (Section 4--3014-A other than the Renton Urban Area Comprehensive Plan adopted in 1965) . 3. Thee B-P Business Parking District is a special destrict designed for auxiliary parking. The zone was not originally in the 1953 Zoning Ordinance. In 1958, Ordinance #1542 specifically created the B-P Zone by amending Section XIV- Parking and Loading-Space Requirements. Ordinance #2548 in, March of 1970 developed more specific standards; however, it repealed sections in conflict but it did not repeal the intent of the B-P Zone. The change which occurred with the codification (was a result of an apparent error made in codi- fying Ordinance #3050. This ordinance did not repeal the B-P Zone, but the codifier eliminated the entire section and replaced it with the amendment . 4. ,The Utilities Engineering Division indicates that a water main will be required on Logan Avenue North, Also, if water is required for on-site irrigation system development charges of . 01/square foot will also apply. 5: The Engineering Division advises that curbs, gutters, side- walks, and street paving are required on the east side of , Logan Avenue North. Curbs and gutters are necessary on the west side of Burnett Avenue North and Logan Avenue North has to be widened on the west side. 6. The increased traffic flow generated by the additional parking space will impact at peak hours the intersection of Logan Avenue North and North 6th Street . Traffic Engineering notes that periodic complaints are received ; regarding this location. The present signal controller equipment is outdated and the overhead traffic signal cables / are weathered causing intersection control malfunctions. Traffic states that a new traffic signal controller and undergrounding of cables and detectors will cost an estimated $60,000. 7. A variance application has been submitted to the Building Divi- sion by the applicant regarding aisle length and staff length. The request.is.to reduce the required aisle width of 24 ' to 20 ' and the required staff length from 20 ' to 18' . This is sched- uled to be heard by the Board of Adjustment on Jan. 17 , 1980 . ,. . 1', I 10;/ ,/ ..7\ •cip I. •E . ,• . 7 �.�.. - r. I.UNII S rr ter` ' 3 ii� r. •`iO i�. i I ,r_.. • nms 's rrnmasaon 110 manrrenlr it oiia:wa r eerGeMee ?s e , t • -:.eiirlarrmr117 iu1�c mdloiieirz� izprmmmumammmmmmm it f`$.;:,, a: • �' �r -� z n� Jr mare Jmamlmrmwr��fi �' '' •ealmHamaiweamaltnegeouim�naasrq� leaamramemnawl,�.•: �:%s..' ,'` , •. Y lIra�lsu.sf:acmefasnsM ifel sor11 Wilk 1a �ara�n mv+ •••• oa.•.1 1f' ' • ' ` 1A.11w111111111 11iif%i11!!1 ei.K1 : .: �', 4 1�1 , :.HY�1Nm1r 1RII! 'I��Wt>~!d!s!'mN�e �smioK mmni m�mmmi�r l f0~ti 1: ';a.F 1'• i i I� of• :'f - S\ ' • 7larla1,1101 RTIFAX _//eerIa,,e i 11 EMI ,I■Nr91�®1I[le1.r:..•.'.••'•.N• CU' 1 • immn uelmmNmeemmemmmelemme a ■amnmla ommammammrommt:{;x, *:. , 1 t, tI �. '11rrn`�1rIa1R:1;AM18S1�1W1� r ::I 1 ' _-- --�11111111�111R1 11�iCm•,•• i�z'a , ' <l ' „ •t •' �M11111111111 111�11111�f11111t111� 1�1111i11111 ;• •.,, c 4 i '• ''t•, :111fiQ111111111 11�i11N11IIII1I1111®Ir�l�lill 111111A' •... •°y : t •_ . 't ' - :. • :ea eA�eeaemeeam�eilaQlaaennnmeeneanna�11enw�i�hseci�ee!_IITIMbA }•' y,t':-T•-•-�.� •- I- _..__ / z -- :..• . • .'.• _ • I 'I'' • - • .. - __ -I._.__i. - ;1 \. 1 b fuogiii,4 -•--I ram/ •'�'� a„ �` ,1 '�,� ' ,: .•'- 1 �. •I ,)Jl 'tip•'i•%:�7 �•:{p� t:'tic'"• . , :i.• l,t• ^y ,i.•:. - �-1. •:v • I 1 1' �n: • lam. y. k•.: ••e J 4. '',X'V'' I. / �,'' '�, ''--_ 'I���' • • +I it I , 1 t., 1`• ``y I • •' f • � r' .- '�. • p,, 11 •P //i .1. "- ; 't ' I ...4._' //li�i:4f•• �tii:•• 1_• 't i.u.A_i/u '' 7..—,:::.--7,.—t--,s'' I i t, •■e}saaaar► liamaaw • - • - •--,,:'5 •t,‘,-1. F• 444I'li t- ,•:-. „.'if•I :'•1 :`-- :—•••''.: • • • ' : • '''k j.. �, t't ,.�,.._._... ...r=-�.�-�•+.xat,.r.- • �.;;'r I //4X 4 e,'.'•• ' !;:' •Y •'°• `9.r• r''1 ,;• . ^•'\.. "�►®�' , �' � Ins : „ �\„ F �1 .rC.�? G,Af oci RHY :' ••Aim ., VP,8t p s=- - -'I •• �_ ,- ! ' p_. `''{ ' (1/h I•'1 �` %,_\•1 l` \\• y .l ..�yp1� •4 ice•.• ..���I0•.I.H' .-1- •.,'.L -ii -[ - -_._M1`y-�._� 1 4 \~ `'t • '�,• 'y,' �,.• •�it i;I. eF :I .,JJ �' � .'..�i .:- • ;1_._ .1-• .1 _ •1.1% `' ''v� •\ ; weed■i ,.� 1■41 01?.. t•'••i �:: �'• `T t• ,, 5.' r• 1 `` . '• cl,'' .\ -".•..�����■ i�J� Xa. [ ■'T•' 1 -?•i �_--_a•�rl-•-I 13 af . ., . •. . ..,•,‘ .-• , „.„,/esimmon /fed." .4,, ;.,:... •.„..,,,,,,,8, ,_.,p,,. ,. , • X '.` ^•“2.'yt' 't•••• >UR.i._ •-•.._.•••...ti••.-.:u�'!•.....6...'b",`'ib'S�4tTs..tafS•••• Ax'dTt?,#� ';��, "� p`_ l " I-- _rt. 1-, ,,. �- .4_:;I. • Lj Caw _ • ._.ul:4'.Yy'r.- .! Ave i. ✓ !.n •1 ,,,i. A--ili,• • .y. .., - •Ikt ti ., f,-1• • • .1 V?! 1 I l''+ : t...,1-"n::',.: .1' 1� � .1 ,- Lam^• ; .t �_ i ,,,• • NI innusrRiRL r.r. .IN N •of, '- • _ ' 4 ^a1 1•�- • -tom �'•7. J �• ��� i� •i�.i _L..--� 1 { lir_I_, _,1 l�,i 6' 4L� rRI`11LY 1zg5• ': I '.3" `''�\ :'-. `\ - i 1,. ' ,'-'" ' i! !�„. �•✓Wv y 1 .,'fIt ''i,. ,y •,•\: _ '.. •11 ,1'.��'.7.,.. .., ., t{ /yum-rAt1I gE f•;;• ; -, ,,, -k__ ..,- i �..,':•�.'`e.L •:,�.: _. ,, � ,::, 1� l:M�t:• I i S � 'f ...- 1'IW�•' ...'J .b•y 5'a .i •'',,.�/+ `_I,.. '•-�1r <,�' \2,I l'St, f'UBLIG,O •:;�' :;� it �'� .' k''. 1 •• S31 1= �. ( .. ___- - .-..- _ ' t', • : •...-: • , -....,•,...,,...I -:? ; •'I c • jJ• _••. t�_•`�,ri 114 Y;--}}-- '•'a, 1 , ..1•, .. , .-•�`A,,,,, ••?o•' •,'A v• •�•• - `-+'I•• /1;_ ..•a 1 ." , , 1, ..• •,.... , .... i.,,..?,>:, • is J. ; (( r // .:;• I �.��. �lll � �1�. I : i :1 :• -.1. f\ / • rll •�— - - - ' r n uaE z- viGitITY LAnnv6E • : . - z • THIS DRAWING REDUCED TO '�r l I 1 t_-"�tl ,'-_I. ;_t�•'L. •I .?-''' _1t x ONE-THIRD SIZE %— r3 ": ,r � I , 4 I,�- I -I E i 1e �' 'Iy )astr...; r ' ; eb• :;IS�tS>�•'11'. 741 - •. v,a> gtni •'• '' t 'tlf" . °�As'�R H u,! • • I ' I • .Y • I' i /. j - � ' ryt • , ti H / i i a 4'�1 $ / 1 im. �-+JJ o it ' e Z I, 11 , \\ t II ' ; .;u. 1' N sV. S• T.�n 2 PACIFIC CAR. 'A I \ ,r1 . c. a MI i'r: I k 1 ®_` s 1 ,. 4..`,'F it, �a>22, .. 6�1� = FOIJNDRY CO i I � i\,\ \ '>� / 3 � ear#� zf IA�.1 a�i�1r ,3 ��••u t.■ '*no ` " ,,,,..`4. Qill: \. A. f t �i F ,� air Ci �' n�r ■ i1`I ■G / k \ /::/Igit.', I E_ -R.111.6 i7 ->nT m rn Y(L f. Cl -,mi re 4,111■10 ClEfifie 4ril-,...rtm§,t l { �\ r I •47.74&��YrtInd s- � �7741,:74.,„,!, £r."•°a'�4111- „' >EG / � 1, l �,rtt r , m 811�] 7 1- -a� f/ MIMI 1 ['�n�, _ \- \ N,\ _ awn'Z-73 Mall.1111310,'(11 .yY ,�.. ! ,,,,..-..:1(' /', , "+v+•-.i«....,,,,,,,,,,,.....a______„,_v 1 �'M'_ '\ ` ) 4- ..471.lib 74 04, •,21,65 i ,......"mil ,\I , i"'. " �'! , ``..„ t �'\ Inn F tim xx r� E i ' i r B I l+;hl' ®• Q.'a 'V. .-t p1¢•✓a h r , �� } ^:r. 3. buil 6T. /1 f ,I 0-1 1 pir:7_ � s <A.•.Yy,;,,,,.,,1" om. # , ,.. ,41 I Ifni#,L it Ii, 7 �, ...=�+,, itta - x 11i.jf ��f ,,11 T� -r Cd�--Tj IS T001N 51i .. ''•„\, 4 7�. • E W'lla I i ' 1- .,"ZI - i ' fir+ �� t r�ir�•iPa .�" ;., \�� P.�RK \f,:o.., , i m /I a.m., —a f_ i SH16'NR runuoR ;rr7 .�or 41781, ;i 'WWI : ' �—mini �i y11- S N.'s i ,: F c hit 2 t• ,s „....,, . �; �iw�e� tiu �`m T h ems '— .....,,,, ...41,...., 15C MOO L. SCHOOL i .iva," ) al _Millar MIMI' '4," ,' '''4., "'IN:`,. es/ / t/ (7' -- / a..M,..,...,c„Vi I I Mg-'f _M>Ali; a <<1 I "`r.N'.. \ _��� :�«,,,,, - 4 ITf, _ �� `^ �ir� ""° _56�>t Q 1 , _�'.., r+�l '' �, �I Lei ' �� �ASI�� ' .- -' ' Q � / .� � .Y, �1�� ,r. \`LL` , gi 1 `1 I t■� ��•at QgOQ� ♦i1i . 1-4 � �� K �/ .-F' , ^y� , \\ "`IYL. ro ,I, 1.� �l�N IP•a 1 1 0 �� c .....w yI -,.. , �� a WI1 IMO___..i• .-b. am,La, wq >, , . -4611 WM!, i,/ i .4 .... > 4 2,, , rt,> �` F r T.; k . P� rt r grid, 7'. 'i II �', �_ `+ ` , '_,, ice- �1 q( i'�• �+ I. \ C kE 1, F F I 'rn,r:•are-T..,,,•=2Z;a=„ nr',..^..... ]=2:01Tn.sxs:l.z^xr.9atIca::=ir4.�. ^'�-1..�rartctreaM'�.x^e:ca:.maa.1:::tr.Y'rur.c.scr.ur.usc:marl:_lriLtcs�w.tiaaac• wa.%itu7•,...,•in7'..wduJ„'yd....:-••• •^. { BOEING COMPANY R-455-79 I ' BOEING COMPANY , APPLICANT TOTAL AREA ±2. 82 acres PRINCIPAL ACCESS Via Logan Avenue North i EXISTING ZONING R-4 , Residential Multiple Family t EXISTING USE Presently utilized as a parking lot i , . PROPOSED USE Parking lot with major improvement and proposed expansion , COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN High Density Multiple Family 1 , 1. 1 COMMENTS I • 7 S I • 7 .••,,••••••.-er,171:',,, ,7,2,:''' •. _ . .; • • ..- •--- : : . . . ,• .. . ,. . _.. • -`,..•war c.,c../..c ___ LO4m 4fl./..a. _ - • .._ L.~411010,4 e U.. .1 _ --- - --- - -_ _ --. ---- .._ - . _L 0 --_ -__ - _ _ _ r - Figure 1 : Conceptual Plan - ..._...4. . . . ...r. . ... i . --.......„.... 1 .1 V . .„--7-. 7 f"-----____:--::-..--.-„_ ----------, Pluar;ftG Whe 4.: • . . ...... . ----....„.................._. •Zol?4,77 Alre.•••I ..,....,.... ........4,' _I. •-•--........... <1.....<71“.....,in, . / i / //I 1 -t.. VI ; i . / • i''.....--77.-7.......„.........r..._..._.\,...............:--------' 1.0644..n,C m ,:i , . -....--...::____ • I I ..--..........' ----..•_____ . )31 ._L 7. , ,,,,, ' . :,/. ' i/;Jill-Ft I I• , 1 , i : _-,./.• • . 1 i trt,/,1 ,!el ) (......\ ••• /zt 2/z/7i/77Y/2727> )1 '_ , .. ,...., /) .> 1 . . ....- ____________ • . tz..1.14./..LL. '',',/,..) ks, •••^ .\\ \\?...\<,\\>,,,.. ..:Oski\s',, ,..<,\,\, •>.,\\N,\\,.\\• sc • 1,7 N • \ ,\.,. \\ \4k\\ '• '' \; >7.5'1 1 .1 ----4- - •.7. . 1.111i/1/i /I • • , I I I I I I I :re'Aectly cc., --':'"'''----!•'-'•<-___,.._._...„__....... • • . , i , . , ,, 1 \‘ \ ' \ . i„\_..; I : / ...[......e...,CA l•,,Z Age.1 .-.-1 I.- .• •1 I a I... -4 I -.---._.......... ---.#.---...-- 1.06....•At -..„----- N.. _-1 .CI COC flo•.•41.7 .C.41 M. :**N...-. ....••••--: • _ P.....1:EDGE l'ex,.IreleO)u • 1 F— WI V AI CI 0 6....17._.... .. ....-.-;.;.i cx......i...a.a•....o . . • ! . ‘ • 1 I .e I W I .- • ! 1 r 1 ; . I .. THIS DRAWING HAS BEEN REDUCED : ___ IIH _111_ .I . I_f . ‘.1- • -woe CO C7,G 1 Cs...arr Art.,I ... , rr a , . .01.1,..t. ,. -.I ft. ....... 7.-; ..... •;,_:_i_....=,y_.•_no I v..... 0 Cul:WM MR Ina. -7,- M •Il.d......• 17.... •••• i . . '..--. —T I ...___--_ WE- ...1.-7:7.i o MUM Ws stat• '111.1.......F.V, . .-..- 111 11111TC.R.TM .••••• `..7....... ' BOEING umRE PA,14204 LOT Oil ------ _____ taclunt.______..•1 ,•••••• _......... CI MINX —•••• ..--- ,..,........ ....... • • . , . . id/7 7/7 7 ' • . ,.enton Planning Department DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET A p p 1 i cation : ;` 44/c-e", V..5,--7) ?74o 8-le ir" Paveprieel+ ° ctr1/4 eicia Ai5..t)/1 0'6 iie e.Ci.S le-i° sa_inkin cI./o.45. Location : z ,.r;�� ® / aAi ire. /' lea �° " ' Appl i cant : Bc eeitGt e04 _--- '• - �J �Y f TO : Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE :; //s/s Police Department A, R, C. MEETING.__ //3/8® Public Works Department Engineering Division Traffic Engineering f3uilsdiny Division �,\ lities Engineering �� �EC� `�C1:1D • VI Fire Department ,lr'1tV tO 138° E- /) P jr�i� S (1 � JJ ff� (( \\� l•,� acli• / �irt1 1IT IrI1PF,I;,�l�F nilis_I AT IUf i pv- IIJSCOrdFEi�ETCP SNOT'l I , �1 `jic-once I `; C-E (ARC? TO E.[_I) Ord __ Al 9 :i)0 AM IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROO L IF' YOUR DEPARTMENf7DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WXLL NOT BE ABLE TO ATTTENI ,THE ;ARC, PLEASE PROVIDE THE. COMMENTS TO THE FLANNING DEPARTMENT BY : 1JO ON REVJEWING " DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: 3_ t' R. ;," -7: 5C rj 7 Approved Approved with conditions Not Approved NI €), , Co ry\ vv\e tA, Ts- cc) ki. . 1.. L't 9 CI e<•.,"1 7/(.7 ''`I ..r I • 1 ' ; E. 1 Sic,nature 'of^yDirector or Authorized Representative • r Date RE VVI,E!•IING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION L47iG! Z`/ OCelr. e/Approved ✓ Approved with conditions Not Approved j-r/' '''T 1/0 40),..044dA:p... „Arr. L6-1 r,f.„,. i.I. et,A_ ale- W. al- ./C.a-, /l sOt ate. ,/.. . - .,„„r. e... - of 7,c'Q Fr sus pet), cY41(4= AAA ,Q A.2-tt,w ( , n' 7('I i gnat"ure. or pi rector or --Autfioi�i zcd -Representative ` Date Renton Planning Departmen, DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application : :Y.�, 7) ii --r 74D -ie iG t" ® 8-- 9 IAA lirOveMeeir 'Peer/la/*rans on 0-eiLA°e eX;s °rt Oarka°r 1rice•/®��,5„ Location : z • 6./44ete ez t jive. /V lW e "2' r Applicant : . Boeierl��J Cost yAY • '� !- TO : Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : /5/967 Police Department A, R. C. MEETING // //o Public Works Department Engineering Division - r raffic Engineering /, Building Division ;I ''.-4 J < e 10 rr Utilities Engineering g . • i� hi Fire Department �% ! INS•I���IJ_r��dGPFQf;UGr�F1 �1PbLIC�TIOyifZEV THIS A PnI(iAT OP SHOULD PP OVID^ D W CONFERENCE (ARC) 10 BE HELD ON I AT 9:00 AM IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE +, F YOUR DEPARTMENT DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT BE, ABLE TO ATTEND THEE �5:UU PM ARRC) PLEASE PROVIDE THE. COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BREVIEWING DEPARTMENT DIVISION: /) kiy7-- " ‘--/'" ram?' -'' Approved K__ Approved with conditions Not Ap proved • ,/a/(// /Iff -,„/ G ,,4// .5 /:'/7 -€.-4`0 __ a'-1. 1 ate/, :J c f i / / F -rD 4 `C'+G e 7-_5 cv) t C-c- SG/;,-/'-e'ls zee , / /� C'f-5,-• c_ A vl-7_, 7 ` .Sj�Nc l viz/, -„ J I G-�.-i` 2ccl /r,74, ..s d= c A/Z I-, d 4 <%`/�, /4,e, �l , ./U �7-'• j?`- -- - C_Z""�' z �. >_- _� , //�/ tSignature of Director or Au 1 � tlorized Representative Date 1 . V d TPt ' /D SION • e' ' • -0 ` . �___ 4-1144 con 17.ions No prove l (_____.--- •/ Le p-v-e-i5.c? _.�,,p__�'-!� • �.c'•' ,77 Y,1 may`- _G°6 )z-v"�Ls,G . r / / CCC J _ / - 1 /� �)��f U- :�� ' �7ti�c� y r' C���, c/ �Y7��/c `j(s•h._ // l :'.4lc r ✓c:,.. ,�- g y_e l` '�. �� -��/ j��� �, �) / - %�. 'SPY 5�,<f,� 7 �/ J / 5 + -,- ,,e,,L J C.' c. - 7'�, rC k_ /`1'IJ C/(•.,�, S r 4. l�2 c?�•�) �1'c7(r c 1 5'�.-1 cl-c 7l P c {v c-___S is c"-St"."-E ec-�e" rj . c-+ Co .5 t_. Y"�e•-_, p OO ,�I/,)! , T /c v L. Lu ;pc? IIQ iv LE P r' �J:v i 7' l.'J,cS( s.!( C , O/::: L Gc, ./ ,D /1t ci -/.�t 7-./4 rri A:4-6 _/ 7hNialc, C, hf 7-7/'$ Src 7 /U Signature of Director or Authorized Representat i ve Date tWoit9e,77 .,__nton Planning Department DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application : iv ?''® : '� �'' .16 '-- !otermerg_ ° cza' i e EWA Locat i on :„L__t.lzdtdo of_4fan /re# /66,c-ew Applicant C®m .rt �- TO : Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE :. '/'//s /� Police Department A, RD Co MEETING___4� ® Public Works Department OF_ Engineering Division 7'- 71,-\\ RACPIE • o TraWic Engineering 76. ,t4eluilding Division JAN 10 ].E. O Utilities Engineering Fire . Department OMME IIT ORFSUGGESTIONS UGGEST I NS R. GARD I`!G THIS A 'P A I CAT IO SHOULD :3 PROVIDED APPLICATION REVIEW CONFERENCE (ARC) 10 IE 11 LD ON Al 9 :00 AM IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROM IF YOUR DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WALL NOT BE ABLE TO AATTplp T U) HE ARC; PLEASE PROVIDE THE. COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT ONBY REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : /-'C--/.)� _y Approved Approved with conditions Not Approved /4.1-7"6":22-.Z1,' /7-222. Sicinae of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : _ REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : ° Approved / Approved with conditions Not Approved s S �'�e�✓a /K s) e�'`e'`i r ,v e _ u v-�s� o,-� e-0-s 7 S i c4� rG`10 �... riv< e W!)/ Signature of ^Director or Authorized Representative Date •gym v.'�tw�s 3,R •7) ' y'7;7s�,;��, \ n • �, ;/FINAL CLARATION OF A _ .DN--SIGNIFICANCE Application No.. R-454-79 PROPOSED Decl\aration Environmental Checklist No . ECF-529-79 IN FINAL Decl arat ' on Description of proposal APPLICANT SEEKS APPROVAL OF A REZONE FROM S-1 TO R-2 FOR THE PURPOSE OF FUTURE MULTIPLE FAMILY , Proponent CHARLF_S •A GRAMPS . _ NORTH SIDE OF SUNSET BLVD. N.E. APPRO . 170 FEET EAST OF Location of Proposal NEWPORT AVENUE N.E. Lead Agency CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT , This proposal has been determined to have t a p p ,__ ,�, not have '' sing „ificant adverse impact upon the environment .',/ n EIS is Q• , is not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 (2 ) (c ) . / This decision was m• i.e after review by the lead agency of a comp eted environmental checklist and other information on file, with - he lead agency . NON / Reasons for declaration of environmentalAsi ' ificance : CO THE PROPOSAL COMPLIES WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE /LAN (2) THE LOW DENSITY MULTIPLE FAMILY ZONE PROVI"_S A BUFFER BETWEEN THE ESTABLISHED SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AREA TO THE NO' H AND SUNSET BLVD. N.E. , Measures , if any , that could t/: ken to prevent or mitigate' the environmental impacts to suc an/ extent that the lead agency', would withdraw its declaration of g,' i fi cance and issue a ; {x.= 16 `•11/final ) 'e' declaration of non-signifi act' : ' all C V '/ b / ' ._ - Responsible Offi' i)al DAVID R. CLEMENS , Title SENIOR rLANNER n l _ Date JANUARY 14, 1980 i ,/ Signature 7 ie/ 4:(6 / 4%'-.9- City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 6 xy Yx�r 1?4,A FINAL 1 :LARAT I ON OF t e om, ° N—S I GN I F I CANCE Application No . R-455-79 am PROPOSED Declaration Environmental Checklist -No . ECF-530-79 't, FINAL Declaration Description of proposal Applicant seeks a rezone of the subject site from R-4 to B-P to allow for major improvement and partial expansion of the existing parking facilities . Proponent BOEING COMPANY --'West side of Logan Avenue North between North 4th and Location of Proposal North 6th Streets Lead Agency CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT This proposal has been determined to 0 have 0.4not have a significant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS , is g^'` is not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 (2 ) ( c ) . This decision was ma after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency . (%i Reasons for declaration of �/dvironmental significance : ( 1) The proposed rezone would slow the redevelopment of an existing non-conforming parking area and eliminate the present non-conforming use, ( 2) the redevelopment of said site will require compliance with the Parking & Loading Ordinance including the provision of landscape screening and access control , and ( 3) proposed improvements will provide a limited landscaped buffer between the existing industrial and residential uses . Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a ("` : 'y/fi na1 ) declaration of non-significance : Responsible Official GORDON Y. ERICKSEN Title Plann ' n Ifirector Date January 11 , 1980 Signature City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 OF R4,, AsA mo O . THE CITY ;S F RENTON MUNICIPAL BUIL r;ONG 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON WASH.9„i55' CHARLES J. DELAURENTI D MAVOR 0 PLANNING DEPARTMENT °^S$ 235- 2550 O P 947 • TFo SEP�EM�� January 2 , 1980 L. T. Hedin Boeing Commercial Airplane Company P. 0. Box 3707, MS 62-15 Seattle, Washington 98124 RE: NOTICE OF APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR APPLICATION FOR REZONE FROM R-4 TO B-P, File R-455-79; property located on Logan St . No. between North 6th St . and North 4th St . Dear Mr. Hedin : The Renton Planning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on December 24 , 1979 A public hearing before the City or-Wilton Hearing Examiner has been set for January 15, 1980 at 9 :00 a.m. Representatives of the applicant are asked to be present. All interested persons are invited to attend the hearing . If you have any further questions , please call the Renton Planning Department, 235-2550. Very truly yours , Gordon Y. Ericksen Planning Director , By : 6r0NJ J. Blaylock Associate Planner cc : Arthur I . G. Lee . Kramer, Chin & Mayo, Inc. 1917 First Ave. Seattle, WA 98101 Paul Ouellette, Boeing Co. i44'.08:i'.' 4. :7 tip' k'i Nil 1 _n ''"r' p„'i A-`S+hY. l 0 .a 't�.,,4 }�..L+•ry ,� ! r, i h3.si� 'Ri rS t f�r‘ l u�.r 1 1 e F.. 'M�h 'a7v.' I '44 . rWry l.Y f . 44, ,, rr tlK4.•'� 'y•1 4� �k` 4 • S• 41# $"t,. •r , ,r.. J,K r .', &; 4 1, '; ';, i ''fia u,..�5 ;• ."'_+ GENERAL LOCATION: AND, 0- =3 ADDRESS: LOGAN ST, N . BETWEEN NORTH 6TH AND NORTH 4TH ST. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS ON FILE IN THE RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT G S POSTED TO NOTIFY PP • PERTY OWNERS OF Ili 4 .,,,,,, . , .,,.:, ti.} .i °' , f i' a,. t' 1:£:t." „, q •w .{rY .„ 'f3°- , y+ft,.ro t .' •h •„( !' 'i'+rS , t 3r ^.r I TO F ,E HELD IN CITY COUNCIL CRAM':ERS1 MUNICIPAL z UILDING ON JANUARY 15, 1980. =jEGINNING AT 9 :00 AM FS.IR. C• ., . ERNI °: I 1 R'I , -]-41 ':E .y :t i z ...,. R-4 To B-P III E FIT ,,1 • Si ,,,,,, , , r ati ht} •idtf R4 xM 11 [1 `;{ j� J r�� '� / ,trx *' k v� y�� • v. *f , 1. s 4 t '1''. • �{ tw " 4 Yi`r f r t ', �. ER -„r', 'F• , ..,.Yin Y.d_r� •d `rn� 51 f�. s N rr M .1;+.. :J • ti i Y III , _ ,, 1; 1, FOR FU =MTHER INFORMATION CALL 235 2550 ' THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE {.,MOVED WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION , F/ NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL , RENTON , WASHINGTON , ON JANUARY 15 , 19 80 , AT 9: 00 A. M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: 1. MICHAEL E. BAKER, APPLICATION FOR EXCEPTION TO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE REGARDING PLACEMENT OF SEPTIC TANK SYSTEM, File E-460-79; property located at 2109 Talbot Road South . 2 . SHANNON O'NEIL, APPLICATION FOR REZONE FROM G TO B-1, File R-456-79 ; property located on the northeast corner of Sunset Boulevard N.E . and Duvall Avenue N .E . 3. CHARLES A. GRAMPS , APPLICATION FOR REZONE FROM GS-1 TO R-2, File R-454-79 ; property located on Sunset Blvd. N.E. between Newport Ave. N.E . and Union Ave. N.E. 4. BOEING COMMERCIAL AIRPLANE COMPANY, APPLICATION FOR REZONE FROM R-4 TO B-P , File R-455-79; property located on Logan St . No. between North 6th St . and North 4th St . Legal descriptions of applications noted above are on file in the Renton Planning Department . • ALL INERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON JANUARY 15, 1980 AT 9:00 A. M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS . GORDON Y. ERICKSEN PUBLISHED January 4 , 1980 RENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR CERTIFICATION I , STEVE MUNSON , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PtiOPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me , a Notary Public , on the2nd day of Ja1ivary 1980 SIGNED � ®® VOA., S4V o THE CITY OF RENT * N � ®e9 Crt Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON.WASH..98055 0 ax P CHARLES J. DELAURENTI MMIAVOR o PLANNING DEPARTMENT °9,0 ass-asso O�4T�O SEPZE�O�P December 19 , 1979 TO: Board of Public Works FROM: Planning Department RE: BOEING COMMERCIAL COMPANY .- USE OF EXCESS PUBLIC RIGHT-OF--WAY As of this• date, the applicant has not submitted an appli- cation for a rezone on the subject property. Without a site plan to evaluate the need for excess property, it is impossible for this department to respond to the Board of Public Works at this time-. We request that it be continued for another week. RJB:wr - s • BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS Wednesday, December 12, 1979 Renton Municipal Building 9:00 a.m. 4th Floor Conference Room • • • Present: Warren C. Gonnason, Chairman • Richard Geissler, Fire Chief . John Webley, Parks S Recreation Director Paul Lumbert, Traffic Operations Engineer Dave Clemens, Planning Department Richard Houghton, Engineering Supervisor • Jean Truman, Secretary • Richard Orosco, Taco John's ' R. E. Riggle, The Boeing Co. L. T. Hedin, The Boeing Co. P. L. Oulette, The Boeing Co. • Richard Kato, Kramer, Chin & Mayo ' Arthur Lee, Kramer, Chin & Mayo MINUTES N U T E S 1. CALL TO ORDER - The December 12th, 1979 meeting of the Board of Public Works was. called to order at 9:00 a.m. by Chairman Gonnason. . 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 28 1579 - Moved by RICHARD GEISSLER, eeconded by DAVE CLEMENS, the minutez o6 Novembelt 28th be appowved a6 wti,tten. MOTION CARRIED. 3. CORRESPONDENCE - Memo from Ronald Nelson, Building Division Supervisor, attached memoran- dum and copies of agreements with Renton Assembly of God Church by Crown Glass Co., Duke's Trans- ' mission Sales & Service and Sohuck's Auto Supply certifying parking spaces for the church. The City Attorney's memo verified that the letter agreements were binding as contracts. Moved by • DAVE CLEMENS, eeconded by RICHARD GEISSLER, .the eofvteapondence be te6ejrned to the P.tann.Lng Depart- ' men.: Got tev.iew and tepott at .the next meeting. MOTION CARRIED. 4. REFERRALS FROM CITY COUNCIL: a. Re uest for Rescission of Sewer Easement Renton Village Co. - it was noted that this matter had not been sufficiently reviewed. Moved by RICHARD GEISSLER, beeonded by DAVE CLEMENS, .to continue Got one week. MOTION CARRIED. • 5. REFERRALS FROM DEPARTMENTS: . • a. Deferral of Off-Site Improvements (Taco John's) Orosco, Inc.' on Hardie Ave. N.W. - Property Located at N.W. 3rd Place and Nelson Place N.E. -- Planning Department report noted . the applicant had requested a deferral of off-site improvements on Hardie Ave. N.W. which would .include curb, gutters and sidewalks. It would appear that a new business should construct all of the required improvements on public rights-of-way adjacent to the business and a major change in use would encourage the upgrading of the general area and improvements to the site should be made with construction• of the building. Planning Department recommended the request be denied. 'Mr. Clemens noted that unless there was some physical reason the improvements could not be made • at this time, it should not be deferred. The applicant, Mr. Orosco, being present, was asked il/, if there was any such. reason and he replied that there was not. Moved by RICHARD'GEISSLER, f eeconded by DAVE CLEMENS, .that the 'Lee/neat got de6e at be denied. MOTION CARRIED. I b. Application for Use of Excess Public Right-of-Way, Boeing Commercial Airplane Co., Block Bounded by Logan Ave. N., N. 6th St., Burnett Ave. N. and N. 4th St. - Planning Department report noted the applicant is requesting the use of excess public right-of-way for landscaping and a parking lot. At this' time the Hearing Examiner has not heard the request for the rezone of the property to allow a parking lot. ' Therefore, the request for use of-excess public right- . of-way would appear to be premature, and it should be held until the Hearing Examiner has heard the requested rezone application: The report recommended the matter'be continued indefinitely • until the Hearing Examiner has made a recommendation to the City Council on the rezone request. Mr. Oulette said the Boeing Company .was trying to get these matters going concurrently so it wouldn't be spread over such a long period of time and noted that there.wouldn't be much point in going for the rezone if the City wasn't willing'to grant the use of the right-of-way. Mr. Lee, Kramer, Chin 6 Mayo, put the map of .the project on the board, along•.with pictures of the site at•the present time and explained the proposed project. He noted the property is approxi- mately 100 feet in width and approximately 1,200 feet •in length; Logan has, a right-of-way of 100 feet, Burnett has a right-of-way of 60 feet. It will have a -6 ft. sidewalk, 5 ft. planting • ' strip on the easterly edge, but no sidewalk on the easterly edge as there is relatively little use for pedestrian traffic on the east side. Mr. Webley queried_as what alternative.Boeing would have to using the right-of-way and Mr. Lee said if they couldn't get the right-of-way, it probably would not be deyeloped as a parking lot as it would be too narrow. Mr. Webley noted BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS • J/ 12/12/79 - Page Two 011 0 I:IL that the project would impact the people living in that area but th h t re were somepositives in the project.also, the landscaping and sidewalks. Furtheraiscussion followed on the width ' of Burnett Ave. N., turning lanes and fire hydrants along Burnett Ave. N. A suggestion was made that the residents along Burnett Ave. p 3.s b •, should be contacted regarding the project. ved by DAVE CLEMENS, seconded by RICHRV GEISSLER, the matter be neb_enRed to ,the Ttabb.ie V.iv.L- ' • s.ion and .the Rearming Depart rent ban one week bon .e.v.iew." MOY TON CARRIED. c. Application For Business License, Jim's Concrete, 3613 N.E. 12th St. -Reports from Building, Planning and Fire Departments were read. Moved by DOE CLEMENS, seconded by RICHARD . GEISSLER, .the appti.cation be approved subject to the bo-eLowLng Restn,Letions: (1) Obb.ice use only, no e.ud-tomens at .this address; (2) No d.tonage ob mate/Lida, equipment, supptie6 oh. commm.- c at veh.icees; .(3) No signs at th-is address; (4) EmpLoyees at this address sh t t be £.tmi ted to bamity membeAs and (5) Minimum 2A 10BC noted 1 e. ext%nguisheR negwviced and .these pnemesea shalt be open boA inspection dwu.ng normal with howls bon the punpase ob ascertaining and causing to be eonreeted any conditions which would Reasonab.Ey tend to cause Sine oA eontAibute to .its spAead'as' pelf Un.ibonm Fine Code. MOTION CARRIED. 4. a. Request for Rescission of Sewer Easement, Renton Village Co. - Mr. Houghton noted that the request from Renton Village seemed to be in order. Moved by RICHARD GEISSLER, seconded by DAVE CLEMENS, that the matter ob the sewer easement at Renton V.ittage be neeons.idered: MOTION CARRIED. Moved by DAVE CLEMENS, seconded by PAUL LUMBERT, the Board cancan. in the request and Recommend to the City Council the request be granted. MOTION CARRIED. 6 . OLD BUSINESS: None 7. NEW BUSINESS: None • 8. COMMENTS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS: None 9. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting adjourned at 9:50 a.m. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 1 , • QUIT CLAIM DEED THE GRANTOR, BURLINGTON NORTHERN INC. , a Delaware corporation for and in consideration of Ten and No/100 Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration, conveys and quit claims to THE BOEING COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, GRANTEE, any or all interest of Burlington Northern Inc. in the following described real estate, situated in the County of King, State of Washington, including any interest therein which grantor may hereafter acquire: • THAT PORTION OF THE BURLINGTON-NORTHERN INC. /J •V� (FORMERLY NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY CO.) 100 . 9 FOOT RAILWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY IN SECTIONS 7 AND • 8, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST. , W.M. , LYING . BETWEEN THE NORTH MARGIN OF NORTH 4TH STREET AND THE SOUTH MARGIN OF NORTH 6TH STREET IN THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said corporation has caused this instrument to be executed by its proper officers and its corporate seal to be hereunto affixed this • •6th. • day of August• 19 79 . 0� ���� AE�� 19 .i ' BURLINGTON NORTHERN INC.By • 1t : DEC 1919 ice President B `9NN Pc,..� y Lajt Secretary , 1/yG DV STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss . COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) On this 6th day of " 'August • , 1979 , before me , the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Minnesota, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared J. C. Kenadv and F. A. nQm'i n(7 to me known to be the Vice President and Assistant ' • Secretary, respectively, of Burlington Northern Inc. , the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and ackpowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that they were authorized to execute the said instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. Witness my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first above written. 1 X AAA6AAAAAWAAAA AAA A AAAA AA A 4 A t 4A44 x J.W.THAYER > a i,�`4 NOTARY PUBLIC-�;IN NESOTA f • • • • . a �,`z RAMSEY COUNTY . 1- My Commission Expires Nov.17. 19E5 t• Nota Public in an r the %rrrvrrrrvrrarvv YYx State of Minnesota, esiding at • St. Paul • • • CITY OF RENTON REZONE APPLICATION FOR OFFICE USE ONLY F Pk- nr��LAND USE HEAPING 1vtb APPLICATION NO. fcs� EXAMINER 'S ACTION ✓J APPLICATION FEE $ APPEAL FILED DEC 19 ijg RECEIPT NO. CITY COUNCIL ACTH "' �tr=-•.e.�,n F� FILING DATE /02 79 ORDINANCE NO. AND S HEARING DATE DEPN- APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 10 : 1 . Name Boeing Commercial Airplane Company Phone (206) 737-9982 Address c/o L. T. Hedin, P.O. Box 3707, MS 62-15, Seattle, Washington 98174 3. Property petitioned for rezoning is located on Logan Street North between North 6th Street and North 4th Street 4 . Square footage or acreage of property 2.82 acres 5. Legal description of property (if more space is required, attach a separate sheet) Legal description is given in Addenda, Ltem L • 6 . Existing Zoning R-4 Zoning Requested B-P NOTE TO APPLICANT: The following factors are considered in reclassifying property. Evidence or additional information to substantiate your request may be attached to this sheet. (See Application Procedure Sheet for specific requirements . ) Submit this form in duplicate. 7. Proposed use of site Proposed use is describe in Addenda, Item 7_ Saa d n l�,r�ri___,g,n Item 4, copy of Application for Variance. 8. List the measures to be taken to reduce impact on the surrounding area. Mitigating measures are listed i,jI\ddenda, Item 3_ 9 . How soon after the rezone is granted do you intend to develop the site? Grading is expected to begin within 3-5 weeks after the rezone (about April 1980). Construction is expected to be completed 4 months after the rezone (about June or July 1980). 10 . Two copies of plot plan and affidavit of ownership are required. Planning Dept. 1-77 ADDENDA 1. APPLICATION ITEM 5: LEGAL DESCRIPTION THAT PORTION OF THE BURLINGTON-NORTHERN, INC. (FORMERLY NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY) 100-FOOT RAILWAY RIGHT-OF- WAY IN SECTIONS 7 AND 8, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST., W.M., LYING BETWEEN THE NORTH MARGIN OF NORTH 4TH STREET AND THE SOUTH MARGIN OF NORTH 6TH STREET IN THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF LYING WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY OF NORTH 4TH STREET DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE CENTERLINE INTERSECTION OF NORTH 4TH STREET AND WILLIAMS AVENUE NORTH WHENCE THE CENTERLINE INTERSECTION OF NORTH 4TH STREET AND PARK AVENUE NORTH BEARS 589°00'09"E; THENCE N89°00'09"W ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF NORTH 4TH STREET 284.14 FEET TO A POINT FROM WHENCE THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID'" SECTION 7 BEARS Sl°06'06"W 12.43 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING N89°00'09"W ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF NORTH 4TH STREET 67.71 FEET TO THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID RAILWAY AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. THENCE CONTINUING N89°00'09"W ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF NORTH 4TH STREET EXTENDED 104.20 FEET TO THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID RAILWAY; THENCE N17°19'18"E ALONG SAID WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE 73.00 FEET; THENCE S70°33'09"E 100.07 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID RAILWAY WHICH LIES N17°19'18"E 40.00 FEET FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE S17°19'18"W 40.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; CONTAINING 2.82 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. �.k ®F &\ Cab �.)\, Please see the drawings on separate sheets for boundaries. DEC 19 18�y r �o , NI;� ADDENDA 2. APPLICATION ITEM 7: PROPOSED USE OF SITE (Site includes property and abutting rights-of-way) The site includes the Boeing property described in item 5 (see Addenda item 1), and some of the street rights-of-way of the abutting streets (Logan Avenue North, North 6th Street, Burnett Avenue North, and North 4th Street). 'The total area of abutting street rights-of-way to be used is' approximately 1.02. , The total site area is approximately 3.84 acres (property and rights-of-way). An application for use of these rights-of-way has been submitted to the Renton Board of Public Works. The conceptual development plan (Figure 1) shows the proposed use for the street rights-of-way. The plan is shown in larger scale on a separate sheet. (Zoning requested) The property is currently zoned R-4 (apartment use, see Figure 3). The rezone to B-P (business parking) is being requested for the property, so that the property and the street rights-of-way can be renovated, and the number of parking spaces on the site be increased to approximately 375. This is the minimal rezone needed to allow for major improvement and partial expansion of the existing parking facilities. (Existing use of site) The renovated facility will serve as an all-day industrial parking lot for the south facilities of the Boeing Commercial Airplane Company. The site is currently used for all-day industrial parking by Boeing employees. There are about 270 designated stalls in the present parking lot. Boeing employees park in the lot and also on the abutting street rights-of-way of Burnett Avenue North and Logan Avenue North. The abutting rights-of-way provide an additional 80 spaces. The combined parking capacity is about 350 spaces. An average of 200 spaces out of this combined capacity are used by Boeing employees during workdays. Burnett Avenue North residents have noted that Boeing employees also use the parking strip on the east right-of-way- of Burnett, creating parking congestion problems for residents desiring to use this strip. `EDGE OE CONC _ LOGAI.I AVE.N. //PAINrEO EDGE(( I NG) (PROP.LAE I �.I wi L \ 1 \\.. 8f fl ,, ,_.„., -..t _` - `. PLANTING STRIP IT I l _ EORNErr AVE,N. A' / m cwmwvu tVr /�� /I )l . ``_`__ __---- lOGdl d✓EK Rey/ OF SCT FxIARGEMENT Ll l f I / I i I ______� I l r/�^•;`= J.1 I`, .I EDGE O�NVG. 1v = I / ! / Y f f 1 IL J . �t ----- rPLMTEO EDG%(aariw) / I;� "/// - ! f I I — L y �.ywvzayoEy—y—yy—y— L --- _-_� E,IKr!I / ! III \//���'[►\/�J\/}-� I I v •i 11 it � Ii ! I III II II I I I u LI '- -Iri11 I .� � T 1 1 IL!Ll.!_lI.1 I- - ---I I I .l 11.1 lI.l_l. /i \'=. '_ L LL1.Lj_L111L .eusse+ P .,.- THIS AREA _t— . AVE.N. \ �IOCA AVE AL ,---.EDGE 0/CO.C. IPAINTED ECGE(ElCr.G)————J/oFwau —-- T_ GRAPHIC va[r-w - RA4rwG SIII}TR'o 9 e(� • 8• • • t _-- 1i L44NI6 STRIP .'t•(- -EDGE D'Crc 90RNErr AM N. b m w .,.e.. wn re. ...AA. w .,.�.., r,+ ❑AUBURN.MN. set •CCORI•a..•R. _...r. rr, rw•nu r.. ro. Itr•r+i, •rt i et nos .1011 IN R[RTON,Wit sews w. gpEING REHrOH PAPJC�HG LOT pll /•cLLma[D......Hnr 0[uiitE,WC can ....A. ,�,,, , , „e ' .-.1.1'..,!: .. , I., •.v.r ... .. l'.. r••-•-1.1-'-'• 1 ; i -Id - -- i . „/.. 4/' '''---i 17•• .:.',7 7-7-----j ,,a'• 4' • 1, r 11 11 ,1 :6 1 1,:' I "'1;.. . , .1' .f.-_1 r..----- - •-- .1 1,----. I.----i 1-- ; • i•.. ,.' '"-- -----" . ---'---- 11.0..r; G. k I ii 0 •: ',0 I 1 „ i . / ;.L...- I.I-.... ,-...---..11 1- .-„-..--I,.-___J".1 J I. I;I •'i.''''1.1 il - ' ./.' I ...'I' I K, • ,,,• ,• . • ,. ... . ,, • - .1 1 . • 14 .1 1 ,• 1, s IC/ .7.• 01" .' .1 .• 1,1. t-----,,I.----; i :.-,-- I •- i • I' i '1 1 V • 1 I J " I ', ' I b / ., ;I., 1 ! . _ / '.•• e 1 1' ..: .,/ t.4 ,.• ! . _____I.!.._._._.....I ILI- -:11;--- -.1 1, I-f^,---*-°• : . !• . . . I • I .I 'Q)-• l''' 1 • / 0 I • I 'n .1 L.:_ ___2, .2_____',:. -,-----1 .(_-- . • / ././ Nr••• • , :, 1 1 „• ;, •• 1 ,.k••••?-0• \,../i If• •,1 • •r i • 4'' • ' / • - .• I • ."'l • / - •• ' I 1 l' • t' • •.• A \. . .,,,,, • 1 • 0 " .. . . • • WASHINCOON ok4.TY.. I • I. .• . . I 1-1 •••:%.,'7.. .----;r'-''.:;1-',•1 r-----ir---""i ;..---71 j 44.,?..;1.___\,c.-.:7----ii----- ;',A.,.,;14` : . ).• :,••• i ' ..', . A• .. ••• • •,i ,: 3 1 11 I 1 'I '1.--.-.--4 1.<c---6% I----,I-.- .1" ' . ' . • /. \ V' \ •/ ' 1 -..""r -----'- .,,,,, ,;.,• ___,r____ , ...:1---- 0 ., •1 P r ... :, I I • '; 2 l' •I, .I - A• .•,/ • 1II i. a' I I I • ___, _ 4,... ,_..._,,,, • . :,- ,, :_ . . , / 1---I I----1 1-- ..,- 7..•.,I , •/-L •_ 41 .i• , • .• • /• , -; I I 1 . ,• i -...- - ' r:7)'---24 .2-4 - I 1•••-••- .)1 -1 . j••"-•-•- g • . ' • I I i I . .4 '4 oa, il • •:. $.1 ' 3 . 1 1}--.--- ,,.._... ,.. -, .1.- i', . ::..! , _l'i „: •-. . . X „, ,1 ' I • • • / 4", ••••• I I•3 I' _ " I' 4 1----"A , i---4...4 ----I ,----1 I- Ff•OS / • '.4 1 1 • ' ..e.." • ..i 1. 1.1. ,21 1,,•-•-• IA ',Z.' I :_ , • /. #1.4 / e -.... , ...,- _..... - - • •,, .. . , •• i .,/,: ''''•••••• - , .. ..•..•.......,41 -. .• ..• , 0 ' \ -::- - -mil-014 ii1111111111. - - ' ' ' "Iiii"-- ' IIIHIIIIIIIIIIL 11111H-allI" ' . . ' 111111..":4.:•1;,:l.":•..".4;i1.1iiiiii:!:',;.1,-fillifilliGlikaliiiIi Nil : I le t r---- ... I I • /-• ,i :) 3 .----. ' ::PIIIIII 111111111011111111111=1.MRTIIIiWIIIIIIIIIIMIll 1011111714.141111:411111111111911111111•11111MINIMIRee•••••%4+;:f \,;.. '. m: !a ;1 - $'t ' '; \ 'HIM 111111111M ' 1 -illidielliie.1111111111111111111111101.E1111M;MTAPAli1111111M1111111MIIIMIIIIIttVN:•::::+444.:•:. 4:;•''' : • . `' .• ; ', . ili .... . . 11, :.,,,.....:1„,......., 4. • , 1 -.. ?.• 111 lin . r I ; il,i. iiilliliM11111111 111111111.. • gt:•14:+4%***::::*:4'r: ..-. r• • - 1 4,11:: '. \ .1. l'1400;ge;:MegA; .. • I' . -' k ' ' i ItilliIIIIIIIIIIINIMINIIWINIMMASMINNUMIVAINENUERVIMINNOleigili ' ... 4.• \ 4. ... . or,.......or.mmimmirmimmorrirwIfily/P3111111111111111111111111.14.101i. Ver°44044.0•••:46.4:•::...' !:: 11, ,..I t... . .•tt' i I ' ; :INN 1•1••••1111•11P7414:0/4fittinh1111111111411111111111•1111 I MEI eineumIlimen raimmiz.:.:..x.:tp.,:.:4 ._ : . ti ..0 . cp., • • . .. ,•..--. ' .I illi111111111111!-11 Illligliiitall:1:iii011:,,t;ii: '. ' a',„. I. d ..• •• •_. I:. •,.amillimma:7::. :i.....topar•...........___.:__;__----EPS , f,„ . • .. . 111111111111113111111111111111 illk,::::::::::1111filiil • 43' \ •.- ,.. , ? k...,-.:1. : f•--) : 1 r \ .,.• I ''IN". . 4. i I I ,, I I • :,.181111N11111111,11bili I - 1 •• , . ............, ,,,, , ,,,,,,,..,,,,.......0.,........, ..,,i . \: \\ .::11. N. .‘ 1 l''' 111 .."7 1111111111111111 ' ...;.! . ......r .. , ..,4 4. • -- 1 . . 1 --1_ _ N 6 T H •5 . . .....,.^I .., '".••'• ' \ ••..1- ' .. :Arii'••••••4 •1 :.•••". '-r•-•'-r"'..t....‘-•41.• :*I.4: 4..4\ '' •'..;:••-4..tt rir----- - .;!, I('-\ 1' - Iiiiilaiiii•Wailaiiiiiii VII INII 'Sal • •.. ..:.r..;;;' ',..-,zi. • / •, te4,•", ' , 7.,i ...4. ;r;, •- ..,,/ A • ..1 --24, \:\, 111111111 IA 1101.1111.1111111 1 . ' I •-4-e,4,••••--' ' ',/' .,1 ' -4--...-;-•'-• ', . Ve4'#101rf .4'. ,, ''• Te4. 1 _'-`. :. r,i• - :i • •- - • ilrigtEllirlifaillIlf,111111 ,I./.1' ,''',1•,...'," pi" , ; ......,•• e.•, ia` ..:•:°;Or ,'• •\ ';',, •,...' ,i •I ,. : 4 "J . 1 "10'; 1_._i'w-..„'_..:...i;* ' ‘ \ ,•. /.111111111111111111111111111111111n111111111111111..1111111.0.11111111.11111111111111111.i' I " •'" • ., ,. limummuummumurinommmumninimmilowal .! . . ......A Alr, ,,5.?2P !.'. .1 i .1 , ,o, 'Y,...,•'',. • 4 V ,, ,;;; ; ' °--I. I;,,,. t;#4 0,.46:4! jiliiii i 40•0 111 0 , 4 ....,.. ' ..da I.1 , a t -•,'`:•n-:,-"::1 rs.,, !,...,f,._ ,,,._.,,c ....:..„.•1 N! 1 { i '111111111M111111111M111111111M111111111111111111111111101111111111EN11111111 •••, ',."." ......•,,• ,00.4:r , , , ,41 .p..-..-.21; 4.- .3,.fir...x... ,i•I.1 I • .. \ 1 IIIIIIIIIIIMIMMOMmeummimmosnworamiramous ; .,.. '..• . '..Am . 7. •'et•:.••tli AC . .' .,,. r!' I . -----; 7,-:.q.•;.,_._.,...' _. ''.1 pr• .,..si • •,.2 .44 1•,,••, :7 .,.....4,..4-,• ..)1 ;t 9 ,.• I .J1 ., • 1 I 4 li 1111111111111111111111111111111111110 i .; ,LIII '1• ,11 •''. . Arg:0;•:4t.i. , ... 1 -'3-,•"''."1.L" ..:•7..--I D .. . ' •;0 I,;. •..,•;', ' : ..i: ; .piv. . ., ,, LJ . al 1,..1.'.i :..' ''',, ..... .• ••. I :.•,1 ..` ',• '11111111111111K111111111111111111111111•i. 1 , ...1!.. 1 .Ar ,:i - . 460.11.0,-.Aj : • '' --'•71 `1, ,,•,:: •', 1 0, J • i • 4 ', 1111.11.11.1.1.111.11111111111M2 INIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMMINE • i . ....".••A •...; 1•t4k..4'ir A ''' ..rt I7 el] 1 7tz. .. •I .v."1 1.• ---L . . . .,.... di: •• .• , •t..: i , I I, ---1 • 1.' • 1, \ '1, 11111 - ,, 1 • ,,' • '4ff 1 • , I , ,i. 1 r•4, \ n 1 iiiiiiii:pki..op , ;,..,, ,,.,•:: i .,:;':::„4.,, ;. • .: . ',:„...., .. • - ._•,..,:1 .! ..,_._... ...._.....7_ ] ,,..,..,,... ,. .. - .. ...: „.., , ,e,.,.,...4, ..... „.., , . ••, ,:„.......,, ._ ... ....I,I.... ... . , .• .•.i r , . :, . __::: ! /. •; \ o r. • ti 11 im.,...• 5 6, ism' ; ay...ii:v , • = .. I, ; .41FAM 4,i•2b .... 2 1 i ..::. • :I :' ', r, ' 11...1 11111111 11111111111111111111111§6 .•- . i''.4i.'. :::., i',..x.e>. 1 • -,"•-vi,- • • .• -v-7• .• ; I :1 ;:".71. ',..7.-'' 1,7).:1:`;'. 1--,:c‘trrp t ,, ‘or,, '\."13 i• ' A •10E11 mi •• --•••••••••••..,k,44,12„•,: 1P•fit,...• .... '" di P.,.I.•,,,4 A'...,,, " ,,_ .,..,/,;,. ; :Ii„.. . 2.,_1 ., • ,,, ...-:. ...• -; •,;... ... - • Y; i--f,it '7: 11111111///1141111111111111 . A) • 3 ; : . ::-'7, " ir 3 ' .;‘,. •• : v., 1 n " • ' 1L,i• ,.; or 211'...'Friir ,.."..- , i 1 .d . ''''' ,'•.. /• •;!1 1'3 • T. t 2 Ill leilllittlitill111 1111111 ' I ,, • .:,>., g••;,,1-1 .,. .. --- --... ., 7 ---- --- - 1 : •,.., .\\ 1:r111 . 1 11 11111111M11111111111 111111116:111 • • ..,......-ii .: xtAt .. . 40 . • .• . .,,,,,,1 . ••••• .•,. ,,.. • •••, - I • , . ..3) 1111111111111111111iP II NI'- , ii.i.1' , ' - -1• •••.. .• '::: ' :.. -•.... !, ..' ..1.___, :, . ! •••••;:. ,1 ., • T.• l• " --• • r4."*.•°:t; .4_44'74•,..' ,:- .: • •:f: 4 , .,,•• '...: ... .., Th:....; l'-' ..• ,l'i• 1• ' • - : 1 • 4 •-, I/ I „ , •-•`.. •,! .... i.. -' ?..I.- :__.. -,.. k•s?„r ,,,.. ,... ._.. : / 1 I. ,2 ..;•• ,.. il t. t , ;•" .'01.._ ,., '.. •• ,-.' 7 .. C (1' • IX .1•(' k ,/ , .• , •• •: 4,1 ' di . • - 4.0* .--- ,. I •-• •. -•' I • (.3 • 1 ‘ I ' i'..: •• , ..!. 1•41 .1;j •• ....,j ,-Ar ... .., • ... • I 1.1 I:,:';,.'f';':. . i • • -kir,- 2 ' ; '.! :I2_11___:4 1 :4: k••31. li .'4"!_41 ?... i. •ir, •-•!•, •1 • .. 1' • ..... Ir\ \ I/-: • . • . ; .• .., 1 1,.•. . ' -.OA ,..._i i .7.$,,j,/ 6 -A210t / ( . .o • Ailig.•' '.,,... . . J, •,-,-. ,•• •IJ ., ,".; --.II', .0 - ,... , •, , , • . . 1 / ,.. ':'. .., .. A 01,01..••••i 1, '0:•,..tiv. ' ' ,7- ..., i' ' . k , t , ', , • „ '-).•.; 4't ..:Sfri•41•4 0 Ag• ., , I ...,-_i• •:.-,,. •!..1! I '' •'• "- 1 F.• •'-f-.! 2.,':i: .._. : .• L ,„.‘,.al'.,•\ \ k • .. ,,• ., , • • ',.....I.... 4 7..a4 /41.J1 .. , .""• I . :t ., c. *. I• 4. .. \ 11 ic. _„IL..-••11.1:1'''7-••• ,,1,-nr-r-\ . .v•• ' * / - 1 'i'Zi?I't 0 O r;t1,0- . ),..---. 1 ‘ .•.- •rireArdir4$14-1.r APAo31,.,-f,-"'.: ,."•;.. . .-T .. . ----- .,. ‘ „. \I• frfl EIS; .•m,A,ii„,, ; 1 • s., ; "••" •••• ; .4- ,..- ! / • Mil • ,VAIP" PraVAI '1, ...„ .....„ . ,r-01 ,••'• ..J • • % ... •\ ' • •. .. 't. - ' //c• ' / /• •• . , . .P.MR. *r eirigA r• jrAinlr,40, z ';' -,-- -7----7, 2. •.,,": .af/ne?' .--1. Ofi___F/l4er ' • - 1.• / i '' /--t'- • . 00FIPPITAX v.. I 1491.41%W. ' '.: „-,.., -;-.7-7 I. . , .....,:.,' , ,, ,) ./1..• i 1 • •, ....•- c.•• J/ C...7-' Wg-r0/4 AY....\_ .______'..• . . .. '' . •- •-•-•"''.' - ' ''. .,' . R • ,•• . 6 Ad .: Frirfilr -,,, -, 8 ,` ,, \ • . o • \ \./LitirRgi--.17,'. .• • • ‘V • , ,..,• \ t . \\ A . Air i'r •‘,7, 0 • r. -*-"es---;\ , ••:`,!. ,. ,....71%) ..,, , -i X.73, ,r; • 1.•;•• .• •* .•. . ' ••' \ ' . . ,, '.:• ..; ,,• -‘i-,4, ,.. .,....••:,,:FOIRO.,00.05•:-.j; .4,4012POPAr • '. •••.•••• •••, ••* .!. :.-..-7,-. . ,...•.. I , 1r•••':-..-____.---....---:-I 4., Aixrfier \\ •-•,,,,\.. .\ , . • , . ....,. ,„.. .i•.". ,• • - 4, • i'•• .410,1/114•W';' rOar4regallatir . ,,,,••• Wil • i . 1 -,:w'. . \ \' ,..; :, ., .34 . •..•";-.--.,: ..?,:._____Irilar444 t I,• prOpPALIF700 i , a ...• ,••,I••• GNI'_-, .•'- . ...., • ! • • .•- I . . 1- Ti \ • r P • -I • ' ' %‘ ,s0 i„,‘ \ • • • .. • , -..--.-,,3 g•I , , ' 1.• .' . . ' '• galliSIMI •'t OlkiAll, • •-•. . \ i • V*tV.. A •••• mmgc,, ... .•.•• I ,--.1 •.• . , „„ . , ; •- - iiiiimmo ...,-, i-FrAr , .• -..-. „ 4 • OP ' .„..7 ,,--)-,., .. .:„.. ; '.;... , .1i; ' -,' ,-T-,-.1-V'--1--„--1 •,- ..\- . .,„.,...., . of 1. ... . • • • \ •:‘, '••••\.,, \ . '- cre".\ • ".••:• \1 ••• • ?(' MN=Nagai A i or 4 0000.4)P• : , : : . 44 • 4 1,..,. .•- :-;--..., , ;,. .1.•0 1 ...;T:3.: -c-''1---• -•',*H-1-'.-f-7-i:-: •-•- *,.. •it ‘• • • '.. 0,,Ni • / ./4 ammemmir=z. 4-ArAtit i •:';' -..- • ' • , ., . A :_._;._*.. --'• -.-' •- .. . , ‘•,\ .• .../...\ • • ' /•...4 111111•1•MIP • 40."*; ..• I' ''r -•-•••• ,• ' ''': 1: 725°° • --.7.•J.u-I I 8 ' " , " 7.•' • : . . 1 ' : . : • : : • . • • 4. , . i. , - .‘., • • \ '.7 ..,' .'.I i . -,!•+-t. i • •,_ 44:44,,,A• .., ,_....h_.,,,_,14 s.....,,.f .1:11P ,,.1•.,,, •Isez • .. •7"-ii•'... .,,7o,, :=..-. i-7-.. ---•!;.... --•---1. 4\7 .. .Y. -41MM ,_ „ .413$-,,...%•.-, ...,,4". • e•,,,L4'1,,C;..•4 j'.•• ,•:•. _,..1.•'..L._L ., •'1..'''•-:-a '( ':. '1' ' - . -'' "'4-- - .. ' •'.••,:;',. .-1. ••••3•';'‘..- 4-* : '.--'.---'''','--,+(•• ', i' ,.7 • ,.e ., "-NM..• ••••- \,..4::;••-•-4-•,,•..14,11‘,.•• ,.,,___:_: reni.. ,,..„,• „„ ,,.-1..120.,4,.....„.....i . . . A... --. . -• •--, .. 2. --..,,f:•-...... • ••••• .• -.." .. •-• " . i EIN111...,.-•-•-s- 'h.."' •il? • .''' ''-......'..:-.ci,-.-. .'''' '•--... '''.,•, \:,,:lik. (.1/2........,. ':.i.','...1.:,. . .. .... .....'..,.... .., •, ,,,.it•.,....-...'.4-A•.:::‘,),-. .1,:.7.,,..i....E.°11r4.1: -,. .,-;‘1111L114--. 2-4.:..,.110' ..,..".."''',....."......,......:-,t.i.' i,,,.,r,',... ell' ..\',...,........7..1: ,.,.a'.....,..",1....,:',1...ale_,71...14..:-':4--:'1' . -.,,,. .. .,... : .i, ., ,. 2 e • . r" ll i...:' • P. • . • ^•-," : ''•..,,4! ;LI' • - - . '' „•' ,• • I. •'' ..... I ' ,i ... ..... ,., I Ela-tn-J--- i I . I .. • r••• . 1 • • 14. • ‘ • ‘1 r'.• • ' .• ' " ''•.•.' • K\••• ' -v.." ''i 1.1 1 • '..'" • -ale 1111 . -- - - '‹) • ..i......i.,, ..! .,... . . A ,r- ' ..r-R. ..,-. - • ' . '.•( 1 4•••• .i ... '•-• 1 ' .,'. Inip ,:, • . -. I IliZE ; . ,••• .1.._..dr: I ,,•..,. •co,-- - 41.• ,,,: mar=:..:... ,„...i. 1,...,,c,..., ,..,i....il... •, ...._ b.__...ei _..7:_rr,i, •1....i.--_-___I-.‘ ' .•••-• •/:-.'",,• ;."-'I•• .7\_.,;..' .:9'• `....:-','• .. • 'L:41 I ' )1 31 I . . . ,.,..,t: s: ..... , i-C•••••,7,..1.: t:.:1/4. • \•: • ..-‘,„......1:110.. €4 ''' '',' 'CI . 1 -- : .' 6 . ' ',:-,... "\ .• ,•,c1,1,7:4 .- ',:litIN MEI .." - : . • .. ..-- '' :-,- . . .._.•:; ,.„ ....\ ../ .... ,.. .• . . ....,... , ,„. , -••••••• •,,..,..: .:.• • : ,. .. ,,,. •1,...,.., •..• ..,,, . .i 34 •• aim sat ..,-. •,-• . .. . . ... , . N.: rrl-s. ,._ ., • - =••1 '• •';4'•• 11=:apo'm' moo' - =az. II, • .:A.1., , , . el .. .,. ..- .....V:::::1115•;--c••••••s•• - '`....: ::: ill >•, i.. 1..: • 1 8 W111111111:"1'..!' it 11•.:.•ligl.f.56-••• :4\''I°.i._. -.7.---... •-"-:'''/' . ..,.;•::...":: ':';'...'‘..::-''.,:::•:. •:....;.::.2.i..:(;::,;""7.4.25,:••:'4-, 4.*;,'•••;;., igartz,...-.,„ ...71.c•-;•,,, ,I,. -„ ,, h..i •,i,`,7"-..,-,, ,-,• ..A.-4...*:::.`,1.•'-:ft±'Tiri:,4:;.;.V.i:L....h.........:.• ....,.,-L-,•i!.....4::ol.• =I -'''',1--' ''..('--L-rj i' '. a'A‘vt' '.. .• ' ''','• ' C.;.-....,' ''!' 1• ' "‘ .7 1_ i' _ ' - ESN BIS MINI :A, .. .•- [.. _i____. 7.---l•'-..i • ... . 1 • 7 .. .. • • ...: • . '-. '' . •• .1.• 1 '''L •.1" .... •• ..... ...-. •__L.........L. •••_ Inminilsol 1-..."- -• -,.;:. . , .. • .... •,. . .... .......,..,... ......,t, -, ...,.._., „„.„._..,_=,,..7..:_•.-L:••::,.. _:__•-•-.•:.?-7: .:. ..., /t/V1?51-/z11?1- miiii. •.: - .-.; . misms .... • • • •-• • • -•• ••--75. """'" r.;• ••'•'•:.)9•1,.••.-*, .g70'A;',‘'• •' ' n i.....••2,....,.... . .... ,1 , WEEMS. , .. .• . . •,,, .. • , --'..•,, . ,"••\. '4'`,% • •),41. : ,. P' , , Z: •• .10----- .---. •• ,... ... .,,....... ,..;40 .....,4.... . 1,: 1 •,....,-..t., • .. . .....• -1 ,• If 1,4 • • . 4.•• 4 • :••::,.-.)...1;."1:• .... '...: •.....\.,: .: : • ....' •:X.Y I .s• • •..-4, !1,,•. .;•,.AS• • • .. •I • _ __.____ - .. ..... . • .. .• ..:. •-. • T:i• ", . '-'47:A......'..,..<', " 'r . 0- •" .•...:1 i : ;• 1 , .. o . ' 6/t/41 ric11111-Y 12E6. 7 4, • . , . . • • .• , .:y '. . 0,-...,...4 ••a-•.•'••4 i• ..,..... 1; ;: • •- ...:1. / ;.•• •`!- -•,• . •, ; . i 3, . „ ..., , • - 4:6 .. ,,.. .1 .: .• . Z.- - 7' . -• • .":'' .4,... •(•"1. •`;• . '1 •'", '.; . , .`./1 - , Veeerlr4 1;7":') 0'. . ;''' .. I!,; ,.- : L,.I-.: . * ...41...;1-2: ,.... „'.......e.4./4.',?•Ir9<s:'...,.....q.• --:'...-..,;c5.: ./0 ''.....1, ' ..• 1 eo. .,P-,..,.r.'"4---.,,,,,-...-: -' CIIINUF11617,11z111 • x.:+:44:4, . ...,4_ • .,• •, . , .••J..izteig„ 5_„._. ,..,_....... ., •-..."";k .',., eel',:. .,`.. ,t-,,,ei"-,A,•- ': v 1 ." '' ''' '• 1 ' ''" ArC ‘‘L'\<' e' ..I: :::.; '''., • ! ...1„.,11' 'Mr $70r.WIl'......1.' ..• 'V .......(:',Pa.... 4.... .. . .'I 'l•L): ./.. : . .i .... I.::. , 0 . ' .\'•X'' \r'Ci'' " \,., ..•‘'L\:‘',.'1 .P.' I Yr. ',7.•' .' ,Y 1. '• .5. 11:..5.-4•--:: .......-g5 :,....,•.: .. <.......,,,:,:',,,-• , 11) ••• :,...,14'. ,-.4,:.---...1 :,.• '• !(•,..,•1;'...i..'.1... ••••, .. ;" .•••••• •y''. .,.••••••••• (4 s'e.. C/ittsf 7...7 • . •.` "••.‘ L, I • II':•.' \'‘S•••••• 'n• 4fc.•:".-T ..• •:',2i.L. ":.7 ;,_..:• ,J•••:.1.1. . •.•,. r•••••'',.'1 ii• • .1.•••r-:.,(97. •.-• • '. 7N`• '4'' ' P1/1/.31.1iOP' 1*/ .6P116 - , ..,;;‘;. • .--,„ - - 1!. ... .-.1',..±. ...,....i•... ...--4.,,.... -.......,,,„ :•...:4: ,,,: . ;•-••• .... :. • . ..-',..., • , • ,:• .2/ 1 • 2 . , -. ..:.,• .:,..• ... .:7,.; - 7.•-: •. :7•:-••••••4-.7,7r74-:-;*7.: •'••• ••...* . 91•••••..'.•... •10. . 6 ...,• .,; . ,. -t •v • ' : •• ;• , • • ..- 1 i . ... , ••:_,,,\02 .r.L'12.e!.: •• i',• •A,Y..Z.‘.." -':: ••-. •:' ':'.. . •r.ci; . •. • '• ,„ •, OA• .; ..•, 4 LI 1.. ‘s.... ' ,.•' I • •J • (•••• .. .I. . - • ...e...•••, • -- • •4,• • N • • / L__„:........:...,__,___:,.......,__ ;_. .,. ,.,.i_. ____ .._.,' . ••'-.•; • • • :..._ t; 4._'';'' 1,••'• ...-19. :• `* '•.. .2.2'•:;. • •••44-' 1.."8, • '•'`-e...'''‘.*.....'. :41* s.• ' ......- , •'• ... ... .. ..\ . ••.,,, , 1 k.,.1. J •-'•" I • i1.....,n..i • !.,ij7,4.7.--,,ifi •1* •'.:•.'" • .•:...; 4). c,',.:• ''!,••• • ‘.•.' „, ,I) .., I. 1 ,,, ....I 1 .1 ' . . •• --•„:,, •\ T i •••• i ,.. c_,. • - ....a.,--`,:tr.".•!1-L...._. ,•_12.-,. •/ I:' 14 ,,,.._ rl . • ) '.. .,5. ',...•:Ai: r - ••:••; •,• - •• ,"...„, • •.• •\1 ---- . ...• .,•\'; • .• .:7"••• -21 .. " -, 21b 1 ''..7..:1' • ..'e-(2::::. n...4'.,:...‘'• 7*- -; " • ••. • ' '." • .." . •,. ji,e.'0.•'•••-'•'"N /..'; \xl.4'.''';':••.' . ... ... • . . .. .,.. J r.--_ ..t_.-...1•1•_ ._ •.....I ..•..rt A .l' I . •':•.:24'....__'.... N: •.4.'4-• •.„ 4'. • ••• •-• ''' 1 . 0 * ‘ ..." )' •... • 4 (3.1•1• •-•-•-•----- '. ..,__...---.. , • .....4 5 7 • • .. -'. . • .. 121 F/4 I ARE ,Z. - v1611.-/Iry 1_1111 V U.6 E s-.,.L..,,,,_..,.: 7.....,,,..,..:„.::...:.\\..... .. ::‘......° :',:,...4...- . . ..r I 1,1:7 ".. • . 1 r,.1 • . , . . • • ••• • ,, ,_ THIS DRAWING REDUCED TO ..,-.-;-,.;.4. . ,,i,,,,,,,,, I\, \i , (,-....---71...2,-,,.. i .. ,..;:,:,....,. . , ,..,..:.,.,...A.i,. r„p_:....,....,:.:ci.H.:Tr... .:3;,_1,),..:tr.i...:-/..,„„..,„.,:]....,..,..:,.i.,,, .N.... •..,,„...,.. .,. :.......:.._ . . . " - ONE-THTRI1 ST7F i .-1._,..,- \t,/,..01•.0 ADDENDA 2. APPLICATION ITEM 7 (CONTINUED) (Past use of site; parking a legal nonconforming use) The site has been used for parking as early as September 1953 (observed in Walker and Associates aerial photo S.53-18-6, dated 9/15/53, confirmed by Bob Riggle, Boeing engineer). In 1975, Burlington-Northern (former owner) leased the property for parking use. Boeing acquired the property in August 1979 and has continued the parking use of the property. As the Renton zoning code was adopted in December 1953, parking is a legal nonconforming use of the property. (Land use setting) The property is zoned R-4 (high-density apartment use), which is the same zoning as the residential district east of the property (see Figure 3). The one exception to this zoning is the service station property on the corner of North 6th Street and Burnett Avenue North, which was rezoned from R-4 to L1 (light industrial zone) in the early 1960s. Because of the location of the site, residential, development in accordance with the R-4 zoning would be an inappropriate land use. The noise, air, and visual pollution generated by the industrial, airport, and traffic activity west and north of the site (severe noise pollution is created by engine testing) would present a number of design problems for making residential development habitable (see Figure 2, Vicinity Land Use). The two major. land uses east and west of the site, residential and heavy industrial, are highly divergent. They are separated by Logan Avenue North and the site. Continuing the present use of the site for buffering the residential district from Logan Avenue North and the industrial activity farther west would be appropriate. The proposed use of the site, a renovated and landscaped parking facility, will improve its qualities as a buffer while increasing the present parking capacity by a maximum of 14 percent. Between 20 to 30 spaces may be taken up by internal landscaping, leaving a final parking capacity increase of approximately 7 percent. / LAK 3Vy Ada H. i _ - I Z • . - / BEACH ).' ��a ,t .�') ,1 / . / -4 41 --1\\, _vi:!.... -,,-sr. A \ , / / e ./,,, /7---\(1' . \' \-.., '92, • ''' ' % vp • T B o (ram 1,,z \' \\ N ` \ 1 • -,k,„,.. � N�_� J// i ill=•:t= 3 a i_ :.! \ \s\iii 1 y N/,,,, , \\ ....., . N. 8'= ST. s ) c cy H... i L s ., '+ e 1 / I 3 3 2 W 3 21 iTx .144-- . .� \ _-- — N _1.' ST. Ilv.c.,Co) r f / Y II • �9RKLN��.OT I Q i� as ' 3 i '� 1 •--. A . , . ..., , G, . S/TE IL I ° a 5 2HQ/1-4 6-----I • 1 ryyy���� �t ,.,,..... .,,tii-....-...,..r:..‘.„-..m a. \\ 'J 1 IQ.�z s '4 r=3 MI O I j� - \ �� N. s © �T.�j PACIFIC CAR t. "�'t' I • / �. �� -d7ltrf>m�pr..10 7.�f r"min 7-! FOUNDRY CO � .� 1 j /.Mt MI WI•Q 7� `1 sue: O , I .4. _ )O1.W i7 AEI NB u /� s� �sf'�>sfQn 11111 . 1errs �--�; ._ � - •!\ ! C_TAD/UMJ / _i'� ©"1 ......,..... ., • '(1.. . \ . I t•� �`yt nwe t' 0 I tr ' '' ir V� SA, 61. .� <ii-> �> • /. 1� 5�.� c. sip .1 • 111 \ / L{ .aJ�;l�I= ?� LT. �. : i��, o 7 ; ry r. 'MD , '' •a . • • mr-—----• " , u J1cVV-AY .' /.Jr. Li. , 1 \ \ F=' 34r� �z� .• sue'' =:2, _ 'S I l \ .,4,, , I TIJ — i szoe rlsZ / _. Low ; r'! _ � ��,�' �', X — ti cToq �'~ + -i �' � \ - ' LIBERTY , ,. (---N iti Figure 3: Existing Zoning of Site and Vicinity 6 ''I P'�RK 7 aro . L.:4 •74, —J _ l..roOL ecHO, 1 ld_L ..' C+ :�� ,_ I0.i'�04'a� 1�1\ `'' .. / / \� • ADD END A 2. APPLICATION ITEM 7 (CONTINUED) (Existing site conditions; plan impacts) The present parking facilities are in need of reconstruction. There is no curbing on the Logan Avenue North side of the site. While there is curbing on the Burnett Avenue North side of the site, there is no access/egress control for cars parking in the right-of-way. Cars can enter and leave Logan and Burnett Avenues at any point along the site. The conceptual development plan for the site provides for control over access/egress points and curbing along Logan and Burnett Avenues. This is a mitigating measure that will organize the present ad hoc parking traffic pattern and improve traffic safety in the vicinity. The site as it currently exists is visually chaotic and unattractive. The pavement is worn and broken in many places. The present landscaping consists mainly of a black- berry hedge on the former railroad bed in the southern half of the lot. The hedge is overgrown and is a potential fire hazard. The site, along with its parking activity, is highly visible to the residential district and traffic along Logan Avenue, respectively east and west of the site. Reconstruction and landscaping of the site will improve its visual and aesthetic qualities, and provide greater diversity within the vicinity. (Rezone at this time appropriate) Improvement of the site would be in harmony with development in the vicinity. It would upgrade the parking facilities to a more visually organized condition and provide. for safer car and pedestrian traffic patterns in the vicinity as well as on site. This would benefit the local community. A delay in rezoning from R-4 to B-P would mean that only minor improvements, such as cleaning and patching, can be made. This would only delay the need for major improvement to a later. date. The B-P zone requested is the minimal rezone needed to allow for major improvement along with partial expansion of the existing site facilities. • ADDENDA 3. APPLICATION ITEM 8: MITIGATING MEASURES o During construction, the best methods available will be used to mitigate soil erosion, surface water runoff, noise, air pollution, traffic hazards, and other environmental impacts caused by construction activity. o The parking lot. traffic displaced during the construction period can be temporarily absorbed by existing facilities elsewhere at Boeing. This will temporarily inconvenience employees in the southern Boeing facilities who may have to walk farther between work places and parking areas. o The project itself will provide improved traffic flow in the vicinity through the installation of curbing and access/egress points along the Logan Avenue North side of the site. o Reorganization of the parking lot layout will control the present ad hoc parking traffic on the site. o Perimeter landscaping in the rights-of-way will be designed as per instruc- tions of the Renton Board of Public Works. Internal landscaping will be as per code requirement (5 percent internal landscaping for large parking lots). The landscaping would provide visual relief for residences along Burnett Avenue North and traffic along Logan Avenue North. o The improved parking facility will encourage Boeing employees who use the • Burnett Avenue east right-of-way for parking to instead use the parking lot. This will relieve a parking congestion problem for residents along Burnett who use the east ROW parking strip. ADDENDA 3. APPLICATION ITEM 8 (CONTINUED) o The proposed sidewalk on the Logan Avenue North side of the site will improve pedestrial circulation entering and leaving the lot. There is pres- ently no sidewalk on either the east or west side of the site. Some employ- ees use the residential sidewalk on the east side of Burnett Avenue North. The proposed sidewalk on Logan Avenue will reduce pedestrial traffic on the Burnett Avenue sidewalk. o Employees .will enter and leave the lot in staggered shifts, which is the currrent practice at Boeing. This will mitigate traffic congestion, and spread out other environmental impacts caused by traffic during peak rush hours in the vicinity. The main shift is broken into three functions with the following staggered work hours: Start: 7:00 AM 7:30 AM 8:00 AM End: 3:30 PM 4:00 PM 4:30 PM The second shift starts at 3:30 PM and ends at midnight. o Boeing encourages the use of car pooling by employees. This will help to reduce traffic not only on the site but also on other parking lots in the Boeing plant. o Parking lot lights will be designed to minimize light escape outside of the site. • o Stormwater detention facilities will be installed to prevent surface water runoff in excess of current runoff. Oil separation devices can be designed into the runoff detention facilities to handle automobile residuals in excess of current capacity usage (future capacity approximately 375 cars - current capacity 350 cars = 25 cars increased capacity usage). • ADDENDA 4. COPY OF APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE The attached copy is identical to the Application for Variance submitted Decem- ber 18, the same time this Rezone Application is being submitted. The variances, if granted, would permit smaller 90o parking stall and aisle dimensions (than the code dimensions stated in Section 4-2206) for use on the site. Form #116 ' APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE CITY OF RENTON FOR OFFICE USE ONLY (� PiCat t\ _ APPLICATION NUMBER DATE OF FILING D RECEIPT NUMBER DATE OF HEARING r9 44. A 9 2979 GRANTED DENIED APPEALED ********************************************************************** c' ** NOTE TO APPLICANT: READ INSTRUCTION SHEET CAREFULLY BEFORE PREPARING APPLICATION. 1 . Name of Applicant Boeing Commercial Airplane Company 2. • Address of Applicant c/o L. T. Heciin, P.O. Box 3707, MS 62-15, Seattle, WA 98124 3. Telephone Number of Applicant (206) 237-9982 The block bounded by Logan Avenue North, North 6th 4. ADDRESS OF PROPERTY INVOLVED Street, Burnett Avenue North, and North 4th Street 5. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY INVOLVED: Lot Block Plat Please see the legal description in Addenda item 1 and maps. 6. State EXACT Variance Requested Two variances are requested: (1) Variance on Section 4-2206(1,A) to permit 18-foot stall lengths, and (2) Variance on Section 4-2206 (1,C,2).to permit 20-foot aisle widths, for 90° parking. 7.. . Why can't the property be developed within the requirements of the ordinance? Please see Addenda item 2. • • 8. What special circumstances or conditions apply to subject property which are peculiar to such property and do not apply generally to property in the neighbor- hood? . Please see Addenda item 3. 9. Present Zoning R-4. Approval of B-P rezone is pending. 10. Is the Variance requested the minimum Variance necessary to allow the reasonable use of the property? Yes. It is necessary for fuller development of consolidated parking. Please see Addenda item 4. 11 . Will the granting of the requested Variance be in harmony with the development of surrounding property and not injurious to the neighborhood or detrimental to the public welfare? Yes. If granted, the variance will allow the full and efficient development of the site for parking. The project will be of aesthetic and traffic safety benefit to the local community Please see Addenda item 5. Signature of Date Applicant 1fl r a/h,1 / Z-is L. T. Hedin 1J SUBMIT APPLICATION TO: Building Department Renton Municipal Building . 200 Mill Avenue South • - Renton, Washington 98055 Telephone 235-2540 (Revised July, 1973) ADDENDA .� I. BACKGROUND CSS milk .<'\ .‘ ,� Rzy, pD /k \ °Ec 19 7. Location of Proposal: -o 29?.• A Legal Description 4 ��_ . t<", THAT PORTION OF THE BURLINGTON-NORTHERN, INC. (FORMERLY NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY) 100-FOOT RAILWAY RIGHT-OF- WAY IN SECTIONS 7 AND 8, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST., W.M., LYING BETWEEN THE NORTH MARGIN OF NORTH 4TH STREET AND THE SOUTH MARGIN OF NORTH 6TH STREET IN THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF LYING WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY OF NORTH 4TH STREET DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE CENTERLINE INTERSECTION OF NORTH 4TH STREET AND WILLIAMS AVENUE NORTH WHENCE THE CENTERLINE INTERSECTION OF NORTH 4TH STREET AND PARK AVENUE NORTH BEARS S89°00'09"E; THENCE N89°00'09"W ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF NORTH 4TH STREET 284.14 FEET TO A POINT FROM WHENCE THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 7 BEARS Sl°06'06"W 12.43 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING N89°00'09"W ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF NORTH 4TH STREET 67.71 FEET TO THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID RAILWAY AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGIN- NING. THENCE CONTINUING N89°00'09"W ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF NORTH 4TH STREET EXTENDED 104.20 FEET TO THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID RAILWAY; THENCE N17°19'18"E ALONG SAID WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE 73.00 FEET; THENCE 570°33'09"E 100.07 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID RAILWAY WHICH LIES N17°19'18"E 40.00 FEET FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE S17°19'18"W 40.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; CONTAINING 2.82 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. .. . • - • . . _ . _- .. .. _ . . .. . • • • .....-50G4GWNG .0474.AV4.N. i-P.LINTIO 6061(f+117,NO) ,..F440.4 Ldhi I 4i -,7,1—",— '. Figure 1 : Conceptual Plan _____ -v \ -,. i , . . ,1-- • el-----.' PLANT•NG.17/4”, ,-,I-- . al4,044sculti.m. , . . ,... .. .....,_ I -. • . 2. ...-...__ -------_____ •,, i I tri ---..\4-- / I I 7--.-- ____ ED4e 04 COW.. t I rater,floa,,,A,6 FO,4,41.4R46,44.4r ,I I --..s. :' 4.7.1.../...h.:: /' - 1-11;-/-../4_ 1. , • , -,------------_-- ,.- NTED LOGE a 4,9 f•NO) Z I \ 7i.1 : ;; :. . ' , t TT 77,------, • , ,, ------;..-.-- -,,',,,z,-- --., ' • • id• • _ 1 1/;7181-f•LLL/ i „ i 1 0-ii 0 4,:i ) r 1 r 1 n T-r rt hc.7.—- ' -•' 2- , //} 41 ,' .•.,0,,_i,Q...i.L ,i, \ .\ :kkk,„<.,,,,, , . • t --i 4 i / • ------ --- ' •- • • — , Pi I r H 1 I I I I I " " II 1 I I I I 111 L'LL11111111.1.11 IP. '1 ' " 1.1111tLINH_11111 :4'E RELOW FOP 94.4....A-AA.AA0 OF _1414 AREA I 1.064,4 Ave a ,...40•34 c4 co,,c. ...."......._____.--,1 painaez er.c6(exartmG) ,,,,. o• w •,, _ . OAAJAIC OCALA 1.-Arr .....1.` I. g Tki_'_• . • .8 t ---• 1 i THIS DRAWING HAS BEEN REDUCED ____ :-.,,. cir , 1 . -e,x,e 0 4 CO,C 80,44477.444 H. ,., . — ....._=r-_...—.. .. 0A•hAiC>CALI 1,10. Am. ...Au re. § A ...... orri• e. ...rt. A., CC-----IllIT 0 MIMI. Wit ,... MS Allarda Ari/O. rm... •••• ..._14,_....,,.. sor r. MA - avarAva, 1 ::::::.tr.::::,.: 0 E.,,,Tt.,,, .. -- a _ M ALMO .MU, 2—::•Zin:jr..:71i:.......... ,o,... ,--- AACILIVIAS 0-----MINT 0 IIIATTLI.VM. 1.2. - ,•••••••• ,--.—_- - BOEING REVITON PARK ikG LOT'/411 ADDENDA I. BACKGROUND (CONTINUED) The site includes the Boeing property described on one preceding page, and some of the street rights-of-way of the abutting streets (Logan Avenue North, North 6th Street, Burnett Avenue North, and North 4th Street). The total area of abutting street rights-of-way to be used is approximately 1.02. The total site area is approximately 3.84 acres (property and rights-of-way). An application for use of these rights-of-way has been submitted to the Renton Board of Public Works. The conceptual development plan (Figure 1) shows the proposed use for the street rights-of-way. The plan is shown in larger scale on a separate sheet. Environmental Setting The property is located between a heavy industrial district to the north and west (Boeing Commercial Airplane), a single-family and multi-family residential district to the east, a light industrial district to the south, and a public stadium to the southwest. Logan Street North, a major arterial having six lanes of traffic, runs the length of the west side of the property. The north and south ends of the propertly abut respec- tively North 6th Street and North 4th Street, both arterials. The east side of the prop- erty abuts Burnett Avenue North, a local street. The area of adverse environmental impact will be the immediate vicinity of Burnett and Logan Avenues. The area of beneficial impact extends to the greater neighborhood. Because of the shape of the property, impacts of traffic light and noise generated by the proposal will be mostly confined to the residences fronting Burnett Avenue North and to the traffic on Logan Street North. Figure 2 shows the site in relation to adjacent land uses. The base is a composite of sections of four King County Assessor maps. 1:t' ! • • - 4 ii�'ill.f11 n4. -_ I IC ALI 1•IOO LA �:i":!1 \ ''� 1.:1'.7, ro _ •. / N "';1a IIII - / ' LI jlll r.uvr-fro-.:f•f re:7•nr r .r wl..�f 1,r.•Iwrf'o'1e.9•f•nH•at.f•IJr••. c_7r fit rj I.. r ti' J.,r •. . I.i�. �.r-• fr n -•Yq• -•�I ..rl�I!.--•-' ... .,. - -J- l _._•_ .-;• ' .:rr�r. ; '% ,_--i G �I r-. ' -I I-_� -y l__ I'' rr' •�•1r , 14A " I:: / :- I, e ;1 II _11 .- I -.4 ,I ' / f r! '' �\' - . 1 -_--I 1 1 y r 3 i �' t • ._.. _� /' I• JI •• 14 .1 I. r' I4-r Jl jI, 1 . 'I I .0:1,7 .r , 1.rti• .I., I ._-1a--- . I_--,G•--.--, --1C1 • "'I I�,II I /' 1 ,:'��,1 _ I 1 ) t. IJ 1, no ,I . r _r ..), ,. ji L i I N 1 I•I I. "I 1�7) -'1-•� J / 1 /c.a5•'i I - rf +•,1' i 1, -_I I `, 1 i i .I 1.0; \ 111. '� J. /.•i. J I ' •' / ' 'WASHINOION AAl,' t1.1 �•- /:i I'. V 1.. , .0' ' I I • O - J> ••�/ F---,f-':.r-•', f�__-1 f----_' i.�__--i l I�'..: __ -___ 17./ i is .,\ •\ r/ .r. I . -_.-_ •j ! I ,• J I II 1 •i----11�5- - '--• 1--- •I- Z \ i:' \v• , . . I i ;` �. �V I. Z i •I 1N 1• ••% •• j. L , I, rJ.l 71 1=- . _ ,I I• If I . • / � ,F 0 __�... -_ 1' '•�11 -{i7�' ,r 111 '-1 i+ I�, M1 IS 9 1 /, ,r� lfri f ' 1 t I 1-_ '11 I__-11----1 M__. ,'Y� 'I•- ' -li ,, ' o� •j "' IN .1 , -11 ,r I: I I u' I, '\,I n, Il I I > i t 1• • �,.,,. I I•, 1�- - I �i_----I . -'••-1,.---t r•'---I 1 ( I 1i,N' '., • •.!• 111 ' 1. fig' I I fl ', I I 1 ,' \<, I I .I I 1 I n: I • r / f b'' .1 _-•.-_:✓ I r'�- ' 1 yr. _ n`.7'. 44-A:.,W'rlYy • fi W`+0,1%.S,M}1.C+",," '+' ;•Z.,'04"4..'2'..t.:ii„,Sr-4r.`"r' ,,,-.." ♦ %• l;#,,w,r•.w;• .• {' Y' .•a ,.1„,,.,„. __. t, r?_. 3'.. _,. I •�J,� •..�...... ..• ..a...rl..f.... ...' oriiriimim i rac iii Ir7 imiii ijm WYrtit moo imi ila�aivar.f}.:e Y •.� • _ - t •••laia•1••�♦ --- d :Ili®������1�i ���r�i� �w� I ,...........� t , M9!!I ■■iiim .iswv rA� m f■IG■■■nimil- ■iesavarlOmail■mmimw■mommap ;•+,.�••0•:•�,rj>.'•.• "` a • • ••••••••••••r �� "' , ',, 'HMI iiiiiiiiiii;ii IIIIiilliik�lliein oimmiIJl Illl■■e.tu p; IIPAii,1lM■�Jl NW■EM■MN •Ar4...".❖.:..00.❖a 4. • • �1 oi�i■lii9�'11111l kii_�Jiiiirlib ills l;it lliiis�� f/•.••••.•••••, , 1 •'HMii■111■■111WH�1■alu..■L.. - .,, .rl•.. i111■■I11111■ Ilfl111311al®■®■�■■I1,❖ep.•,v,,, •A.:,4 4 ..• :■r1","'".rw..4"a:.tict,;:;".ill l`iiiriiiNikiilolli■ liiiii iit Ii■■41■ 11�■�/®•�•���•�•:•:$•:•.:444* II F.., . ;3, \ I■■I■■N■■■W1rl101G!0'!41/1.0. f BIB■IIIIII MINI NIlIIIIB■N■ ■i■i1■�� ■:d�>4:44.04,4 five,„'' _ • 'I I o ■■Ir■■■■■■'I�fi■li■i1�■ ■!lrIIliMIr1I1 I CMh1l:I■■■ N■AI■■® Co�'••�.00�e�+`•••..�•�•���0`' a '1. 1 \` - 'l11�1111111111111111111111� 11I11111111 11111®111111�:• X•..•••,. i.''�. .. . 1 i1■"�11irJIii.7SslurN �if�������nrM ■■ ■■il ■ >milllal■■�ii►Jls�i''.•.O••!■■�1�■n -: A j>A lisIl.n l 11!!1litr 1 ia1''-7r�9iiiibini iWam■■ow ie i s ■■il■11imi\ anis ..•.••..•■■■■■I �' AO MEMI■o■IUMNIMiiiMMId Ill.■�I M ■■NISI!, e!•■i■II■■s1w mm .�r'iul■■■!I"` I, , ,,� I �= •i. '•• 11P11 A 1'�Ili I I 1. r1 I ,'^ I 1 ..1 --_.__ N 6 7H 5... r I , _ .. _- -r_ q..o _.- ..._ _-1- _--�•.1.�- 7 K --•"r1:_...•.;. • {� 41 -I' li�lMiii■R".Ii�lBiirl�� '■■ -rill ■ ■ ■.. •. !.,{• .•I 4111/111r - illrO. f',._=.f'' -f,__ F= ''ry - 1,; .' " ./. -:,., 1 • ;1 ?/■■■■■r■■■�1u■��■/�■1,.■�II/I■■■ ■■y■�■■d■ " • ■■■� "q' f1 • r ' ' '. ••i I ■■■■■■ ■■■rIw■ I InrI'n�s[a■r%n ��/ ■ilow./. r mono i� ► :., . J k .. -ri, �" ,,,,,, I � _ . •rI d 1 1-• \: /►1/.. + !./ Ir�.1 y / II I +1�•'•�. I `C , rrl�1' •.: I '\• i • �■■■■■•■■■■■■n■ _u 1L11.1111511/1 A 7L� ■ ■ t'- 7..•.� • ' 1. . 1■■■■■�■■■���i■ ■�■■Y■■■■■�■rr��r¢1 1 1 • , 4 - a�o'4 4e!Di u'" i.\,;.• . :;:, i ;i ^ . , ri , ' , 1-•-'4--•.-•� !!■■■■■■■■��■�■Nte■■■■ ■■■r■e■ �:::::::#41rd 'ss�• '�e•'�••t ., h ..,,: ri-.- V rl 1�• . ,• 1 1Ii111A1i��ll�ililiii�lllll�i1�1� �4.1: An r +, 1 - - J. -! i q 1 1■a Q�I I1�iCI! il': ■■.!I■\■� ■■id%■ ;7., '�� ■' fis•��•!' ,',1 r I l Z. '� 1 r`� I -, b - n ,r I 1 ; • 1 1 ''I 11111111111i 11111111%11 ►1111 :❖: •+: ▪ �t,_�_;.• •:, „ '-v , '. 1 I 1 1''1 1■■■■■■■��■,1!■II■■anq■■■�m■■■■.r� I �•',J ,• ` rA `-f.. . _r-•I I'i a •''',I • '' ' 1u■■■■•■■■■■■If��� ■■U011�•.N■a11■■Mil 1 , L•I' ?t..tr .r, , ` r r] +. 1' r, �•i°i i•�4% Cr!%isi• rev..,' , I .r I �:;f-,i '�==••,1� z .3 -� 1, 1. '1 '' 'IIIII�IrOI . 47 •\ •\Ira+ - F •'I:e..!:',: ''�.IRi�.'•s.'�i!...4A,a :. ,J /1; '` `•=^i,. ':1 _4,-j i t ;Itf'-. ".,r_I� ,tr • �'� 'illlll,�l il1lliililillll - _ : - _-.': �11111111111111 , s •J r • 1 I7i�••1.1■■2■-�■� ■■■■■■■■■i■I,� ■ S �i�1{�• �Ffl.. 1 i / 1 . i i ' i • / e.IV,. .. / r.' • .. -55 . • .,1 J , _.,,,.7: I Jrli*r •l ."y JJ I'-_1 Q 1� 1 r -._se1 L`- • I I/ / ,. i ;.r.., ?I.; . -. kyr . •:',•,... Y. -I , '•,- ,..?„ I ,•••_-_-1 :.' • •i' --„ - . .. \ 1 • ' J . 'C 1, r ....''.'� ," ,r----._� .. ._ _ ICE' _1.- _.__-_ _r' . - • Via. ,' 1 , 1 , 1 •• / r• l :. ►.'•.�''fflr"'���, �:'�•s'sr, } r%. .. I .. a I: 1 1 QI'_.. _ _f. N: •.vTM STL-- �• .J ', '11-.• •• �',. •,1 1•i 1; • .. _- _�� _ 'Gt' A . . �- --t1• ,/ .N,,_ _. •�F�H_ as a=_/ 1,:•II • %r'' -��U•, u,r-rtr-7^` 11'i. J r� i '-• ''• �' ilta. .••OMildI�'•I,• Kir 401d!,'�''� iIN i .ram ' -,..,•` .•= •Ir, .i,•-'-.-•`,•,_'_ _ it ,'F • '1 .. + 1 ; ir_I ' "oi�'r . .1, r A! ''+ _ . nl . u , . ;.,a:. --1. .; ,-r•' '-- 1 i-.}..., AT..v,„ ...; {- • ,`� 4 \ \ :r \ ',for a4 /I'A '�®'I +te-+r. Ie• `7 :'•°' 7 .',�, 1N71, F. r:. .., AlgPo Pr \ (7,„\\•• ..\ , . e\... \I..... .: ..7 .34;11111IM..."..;...': --4':,.,,,..... 4,i!. 000rooAlliwoilovilFA: ..*. :::.".', M : t." "... • ' . '''• .:''' ___' r . ...v.\. . ../ . :.Ae. ..... ., , . ... ..,.;,. ,,i0 •, '. ..:.._•, 440 0 4 0 op ___.4: '-! EMIR'' -• ,..s,' I . , .7 .., ,:o•,.., •• . :' I \ > �>,� '. r f;r I r l 1' 4�.•s�� .•II r I':: lzvoo Y -"may 'r i (.1:,:..>T�_.:a i••_:_''": - ;• /�• •-.\ , \ 7 • 4. ,, ° AWN'. l ''.l7 ;!0 r�r r,N• u ` :r •• 'r', rt.n " • •V • .\ r \ • .� I u�If/A-i •.....1�I• G'• 91--��'s•.I,C.."'• , 7 - ., Nr• !rl .,err - I ,�y v.,, , �•L _�i 4 _ �" .:.�. a `� , i .-*��-+-� "7•-: ir'•. y .�,.. i,.~1„ ,v - •'1(? .--__ - _':. .._. ..1. .:•�I "' '�<• . \ •+. •„••\r , ,• ' • : <r n�:, 7Z 7.rr••1r-1 .,r-' I .'7 ,.1- w . 1 �y,�_--- 'I y„ •.. c. \ `S - {'• •-;r'-'' 4-- •4 �''s-' i I.3, q\t • •r_.- ,-'- Cl :+• JI • / t t I ' r A. \'\ ,' r• l. I ,• •I. -+.r_:_ s ,,r•.,+. -•1 • .. • ,,,_`,,i .. . . mr.r{,�ci.,rrrTa COMMERCIAL 1"- ,• SI AVC. N •••• •f •,I ••A 1 , ` if hI .. ..I rW - r•, • z , 1�Imil '. •� ) rl'' ''' i' J -. Olt ,r ,. q ,, „ •N u A : r. n /f •�•`.� -i'y� �»�' j,I ,•z SIO„ ,�,',��• ' 'W'.1 I .✓• •..........__J 'I' '... ' r.�' ' ` ! * tan' rr' A",, ', I.e. �,.• . ..... .....:.'-';aI:9 1-."; \.`, ..,r'- G;�®z ., - -3,• _ ��r----.. .. ' a !i I mil 7t ' I_ o'••. , ••\ • :./ - r _�•' r.� I `• ___ . >'. nil lin :. I °�l FJ .n• •��'.�"; • I: •_....L. ,• 'r!'''rr , ...kft �� �/� \-� /�•. • // 7A rr <' ,'" •„ I •• - .r:,; -1S:,-.2-.i :s • ./' - / VA -- • ' ' • .7,,•, • ■1 .1. • _` , •• i'• 1 ,'.".'l,'-'S: • F4•t-.. -i r!„ ' -.' „' '' ^•--T- T,r'Ln.r.rr,. iuypu6rR/r� ....■� s;�._ -'� - =a �' .�j�L" ^ �, ' �>r.. . : f: Y •. 7�r ;'�_� ■r.rrr .,;JF`r r-', j'�'•.. .r,, el •_2,::: . 1. 4"I.._._G- :i :: _ • --_-- Y 1 ' •N I ., ... r Iy '_ - I .• _ ^ '\ ♦ �• !' :' \ : 2a/ r ` _ . '%'� r S • .,C: ' •., .eJ •�5/N4L FAMILY g6. _ , � 1 • � � •,✓ T � ..�-,n .. ' • • ;�.'' • ` q- •p; I�, 1.,.7( ' � I I F .' • 4 •'. , ''''• 11 .r �f ..\ t• t, •- -• i - :A: . ,4. /.:4f4, •E) ,i \, ;J7 rr , 3r .I � ► •v. i ) = r ' • , 'ce.= 'rnr • . / • ii.O•0P ., �„ � � � ro6w sr- a_ 49. qoe.:\, , .� J/zr. ,\ . - 1 .� \•-`t,�,\,, •I, /t J ' 2 "I , e 1 • -F .. ' l 's• •✓ y', ,.1,L!,:Q:!i •I1,c •I _ , ••. ' -TTu . ' +t -I, • _.•• • ., k►.o�' :• ' •q \ '•,:t ; ,. •.'• ...• . : - . .., ,. '•' {eit • , l .R. .i. �uI •,� ,; •-yy . • . ^C� ' . .w\ 1 .�fR`,C `'cI� • .�t • r • t�. n• .of - f \� ' fUeLIG Of' Sp�GJ 1 . -L 't � • Y:; , ., ..�. . t ,W \ • `� � r � : ;p / i y I I _ II, , _ _(;� '•I••7.. •.�i .L:• ",1 .'1hJ �C• .J. '- . F\ ,..,' I .u. J "\7.. • .A....' ,I• CM .•' I :: .. ,�• • JII 5 '��•• �i;. - 1, . , >I r,.s. I . .rI ,;..;:r✓,--:,,.. t a,. , ..• . • . Mr ,11.• ... '-'''.1' '. • r-. n4ugE ,1 - vi6iiiiry 1.111-tou.6E , . ..• • .. .. • • . ... ... .;, . ..s. „ , . .....,==, . THIS DRAWING REDUCED TO - • t' \ ' -`�a1-' :; :=:•.s:Ii5'1 ` - ---e' .; •• L : ONE-THIRD SIZE df „ t� I -�I- ;; ,r :'x :v : r�%rl 4. : 1� 1 I• all f 1• „f tl'it A• F'� I .,, '`•'•T ..'� 1'i: '�:..t 0�_.. I R • ` ' • - •z • ; -• • - ••• 7 " " a • z 74)//75lid 42 11\1413a A 474/ 7,1 21. An 6 r 3 330 91/4/4,C/14131d Ne) 1•s ' • • ' • I. ss_ ADDENDA II Environmental Impacts (1) Earth (lb) The site, 3.84 acres in area, is approximately 75 percent paved. The majority of the unpaved area is a 3-foot-high former railroad bed, covered by a black- berry hedge. According to the Soil Conservation Service's Soil Survey of the King County Area, Washington, soil at the site is classified as "urban." "Urban" land is soil that has been modified by disturbance of the natural layers with additions of fill material several feet thick to accomodate large industrial and housing installations. In the Green River Valley the fill ranges from about 3 to more than 12 feet in thickness, and from gravelly sandy loam to gravelly loam in texture." The proposed plan is to level the railroad berm, dig up the old pavement, and repave about 90 percent of the site. The remaining 10 percent will be used for a side- walk and landscaping. Therefore, some soils would be disturbed and displaced during construction. (1c) Leveling of the railroad berm would result in localized topographical changes. (le) A slight wind and water erosion potential would be created during con- struction when groundcover is absent from the site. This will be controlled through the use of the best methods available at the time of construction. (2) Air (2a) The Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Agency (PSAPCA) monitors total suspended particulates at 12015 SE 128th, Renton and South 2nd Street and Lake Avenue South Renton and various other locations in the Puget Sound area. From the ADD END A II Environmental Impacts (Continued) data collected, PSAPCA has compiled maps which depict the horizontal distribution of the annual geometric mean of suspended particulate concentrations. PSAPCA's map for 1978 indicates that the annual geometric mean in the vicinity of the proposed project was about 50 mg/m3, 10 mg/m3 below the federal, state, and regional standard of 60 mg/m3 (annual geometric mean). No air quality monitoring for other pollutants has been conducted near the site. However, PSAPCA has identified the greater Seattle-Tacoma area as an area which has not attained the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for carbon monoxide and photochemical oxidant. Renton has not been identified as a "hot spot" for carbon monoxide. Construction of the proposed project would generate airborne dust. Construction dust would be controlled by the best techniques available and practicable at the time of construction. The proposed project could encourage use of the site by about 175 more cars than at present (refer to II(13), Transportation). Particulates from vehicle operations at the site, when the facility is completed, would be minimal because the parking area would be paved. Exhaust emissions from the additional vehicles would vary with the levels of activity, wind and weather patterns, and other factors prevailing at a given time. Carbon monoxide, hydrocarbons, and oxides of nitrogen are the main emissions of concern. It is felt that, with staggered arrival and departure times (refer to 13, Transportation), the additional 175 cars should not cause standards to be exceeded offsite, even under stagnant meteorological conditions. However, a definitive determination on this issue cannot be made without detailed study. ADD END A II Environmental Impacts (Continued) (3) Water (3b) The creation of more impervious surface will increase the rate and amount of surface water runoff and change drainage patterns on the site itself. However, the project would include a detention facility, oversized drainpipes, and some surface detention in a depression on the site which would control the runoff release rate so that it does not exceed the existing release rate under the design storm (determined by the city of Renton). With this facility in place, there will be essentially no impact offsite due to the increase in runoff. (3e) Impervious surfaces act as major collectors of particulate and soluble contaminants. Contaminants from motor vehicles include fuels, lubricants, rust, cool- ants, and particulates from tire wear, brakes, paint, and exhaust. Any or all of these contaminants may be washed off by runoff. The creation of more impervious surface and the increase in motor vehicle usage may, therefore, depress surface water quality. The stormwater runoff detention facility, however, will have oil separator equipment to mitigate the pollution caused by increased parking activity on the site. There will essentially be no impact offsite due to the increase in runoff and automobile residuals. (4) Flora (4a) The unpaved portion of the site (the former railroad bed of the Burlington Northern Railroad) is presently overgrown with a dense blackberry hedge and weeds. There are no trees or unique, rare, or endangered species of flora on the proposed site. All vegetation will be removed during site grading. The landscaping which will replace the existing landscaping will include perimeter planting strips in the street rights-of-way, as per instruction of the Renton Board of Public Works, and five percent internal landscaping, as per code for parking lots larger than 10,000 square feet. ADDENDA II Environmental Impacts (Continued) (4c) Construction of the proposed project will result in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species of flora. This is significant only from the standpoint that some habitat for urban wildlife (i.e., rodents, insects, birds, etc.) will be elimi- nated. (5) Fauna (5a and 5d) The project site contains approximately 0.9 acre of habitat for urban wildlife such as rodents, insects, and birds. According to the Environmental Atlas of Washington, there are no "critical wildlife habitat" areas in Renton. Construction of the proposed project would drive out all resident wildlife and eliminate their habitat, precluding their return. Trees planted at the site (refer to "Flora") would provide some perching area for small birds. (6) Noise The multiple- and single-family residences on the east side of Burnett Avenue North represent the most noise-sensitive land uses in the vicinity of the site. Present significant noise sources are the motor vehicles on the road network and in the existing parking lot, and the jet engine test area approximately 800 feet to the west of the project site. No noise measurements have been made in the subject area but it is known that outdoor noise levels near the residences occassionally reach annoying levels. Increased vehicle usage of the site (refer to II (13), Transportation) would intensify existing noise levels but this would only occur during ingress and egress to the lot (refer to II (13), Transportation, for a description of work shift starting and ending times). It is highly unlikely that elevated noise levels due to the parking lot and jet engine testing would occur at the same time. ADDENDA II Environmental Impacts (Continued) Another effect of the proposed project would be the elimination of a 3-foot-high berm which acts as a partial noise buffer for the residents east of the site from the traffic noise on Logan Street North. Tree and shrub planting would in part replace this buffer. (7) Light and Glare Lights would be installed at the site and the illuminated area would be confined to the premises as much as possible. Glare from vehicle headlights may affect residences along the east side of Burnett Avenue North. (8) Land Use The designated land use for the proposed location of the project is "high density multi-family" (Renton Urban Area Comprehensive Plan, July 1965). The property is zoned R-4 Apartment Houses and Multiple Dwellings (City of Renton Building Regulations, Ordinance 1628, Chapter 7, Zoning). The property, due to its location and shape, would be unsuitable for high-density apartment development. The airport and industrial noise and traffic in the immediate vicinity would present design problems for making the property aesthetic and habitable. To renovate the property for increased parking capacity, it will require rezoning as B-P (Off-Street Parking) in accordance with the above-noted code. Currently the property and abutting street rights-of-way are being used in an ad hoc manner for parking. The property is a long, narrow strip running north-south along the west edge of the designated R-4 zone and, in effect, separates the residential neighborhood on the east from the industrial and public uses on the west. Thus, it is a property that is quite suited as a "buffer" zone between two highly divergent uses. In this case, an appropriate "buffer" land use would be all-day parking, with landscaping as per code to mitigate its visual impact on the residences east of the property. ADDENDA II Environmental Impacts (Continued) (9) Natural Resources (9b) No natural resources other than automobile fuels will be depleted on the site. During construction, a normal amount of building material and fuel will be used. (11) Population Use of the site for parking will preclude multi-family residential development, thus reducing the potential density of the area. Under current code restrictions the site could support approximately 100 to 150 household units or 200 to 300 residents. (12) Housing The proposed project will not create a demand for additional housing; however, by utilizing the site as a parking lot rather than housing it will preclude the potential development of new units. Increased parking activity on the site, properly screened, will not reduce visual amenities for existing adjacent residences. (13) Transportation/Circulation (13a) Figure 3 shows the Boeing Renton Complex with its existing parking areas, the location of the proposed project, and the most likely ingress/egress routes of users of the proposed project. The property is partially paved and has approximately 270 spaces delineated for parking. The abutting street rights-of-way east and west of the property .provide about 80 spaces in addition to the lot's capacity. The combined parking capacity is about 350 spaces. At present, about 200 of those spaces are used on a daily basis. The project proposal calls for reconstruction of the site, including the abutting rights-of-way, to improve its appearance and make more parking space available. The reconstructed lot will have a capacity of approximately 400 spaces, cz 0• 3 i` Ic g 2. /_..•,\..,-\♦♦.\ a!'rn / < -7 - .t ( v ..,-- - ,_t„,,, - ....,...- .- `i ( IL , Zt.., tO11-1 ''' ' .\.''''-ii" -"Ig/JA ria 9 TG' ----.N.\\ (,,q `� ~ :• V I W\\, XL, CIA19 lJQ( —♦ :f ` .i: ,,,,:::, & \\\ _. 7 --III n imnusimmonuluu 'N-gAV'Iz(Vd ._ r 4 z 1101 fr_ii ___, , ::,:r:e.:•� " �` t ,A N4 ti ' _ 0 ..„_, 4 ,,_-\ fic. 1.,_a „. .4 _ -_____ --ilk I ) • .,. i,, ,,:,,.„„......„..„,.....:,....„..• J ; :- f.:=1 _ ic :., :E(( CI CAL: . . /irs,'44 OkZ.II- I t/i`isi 0 ,1 1 O W14 • Lam _-- �'st.__i111i1u1u��„ _ _— �� . , '4..1 ..•-•• o fi O fA- N. . ,,nin'_w"" \\ 0 N rn \ v 0 0 . • 6 :/t'—7:/6"(5/0) hce Q _or ( p • 6:Sc-7:3o Cu/d'o) R• 0 8 M IP • � '1 411N • N Figure 4 -4 Routes of AM traffic toward lot (approx. 6:30-7:45 AM) . • Time and Volumeof AM peak hour traffic in direction of lot approach routes. 0 , •f:3o e/:$0 645-0 o, T H MQ' iv-, l� kt • • 'r+ • N• 4774 %7 M 9 • • • N Figure 5 .s_4 Routes of PM traffic away from lot (approx. 3:45-5:00 PM) Time and Volume of PM peak hour traffic in direction of lot exit routes. ADDENDA II Environmental Impacts (Continued) Looking at Figure 4, it can be seen that the time period of lot approach (approxi- mately 6:30 AM to 7:45 AM) coincides with the morning peak hours on all approach routes except Logan Avenue North southbound. Therefore, the addition of 175 cars to current usage levels could have a significant effect. on morning peak-hour volumes in the immediate vicinity. There will be little impact on traffic in the greater neighborhood since the net effect of the project will be the relocation of existing parking activity to the site. Figure 5 shows the exit routes on key streets in the vicinity of the site. By like reasoning, the addition of 175 cars could also have a significant effect on afternoon peak-hour volumes in the immediate vicinity. Again, there will be little impact on traffic in the greater neighborhood since the net effect of the project will be the relocation of existing parking activity to the site. (13b) As stated previously, the Boeing Renton complex has approximately 17,000 employees and 13,000 parking spaces. All 17,000 employees would be at the complex shortly before 3:30 PM on any given weekday. Therefore, it is conceivable that all 13,000 parking spaces could be occupied at one time. The proposal, by its very nature, would affect an existing parking facility. How- ever, it would not create a demand for additional parking. The proposal will, in effect, reduce the potential for parking congestion in nearby residential streets by encouraging Boeing employees to park on the site. If partial use of the Logan Avenue North and Burnett Avenue North rights-of-way is granted by the city of Renton, the project will eliminate about 80 public parallel parking spaces, which would be incorporated into the parking lot. These spaces, and spaces in nearby residential streets, are presently being used by Boeing employees for all-day parking. ADDENDA II Environmental Impacts (Continued) about 50 spaces more than present capacity or a maximum increase of 14 percent. Between 20 to 30 spaces may be taken up by internal landscaping leaving a final parking capacity of 375 spaces, or increase of 7 percent. This will allow a traffic increase of about 175 cars over present traffic on the lot. The Renton complex has about 17,000 employees and 13,000 parking spaces. Approximately 15,000 employees work during the main shift and 2,000 employees work during the second shift. A nominal work force is present during the third shift. In order to relieve traffic congestion the main shift is broken into three functions with the following staggered work hours: Start: 7:00 AM 7:30 AM 8:00 AM • End: 3:30 PM 4:00 PM 4:30 PM The second shift starts at 3:30 PM and ends at midnight. Figure 4 shows the approach routes on key streets in the vicinity of the site. It is not known what proportion of the total lot usage could be attributed to each of the three basic approach directions. It is believed that the majority of lot users would come from areas south of the complex. That figure also shows the peak traffic hour and volume on each roadway link in the direction corresponding to lot approach. The peak hours and volumes are taken from actual traffic counts performed by the City of Renton Traffic Engineering Department from June 19, 1978, to August 4, 1978. The traffic volumes do not balance exactly because the traffic counts were not made concurrently on all links. Traffic counts were not made on Burnett Avenue North, which has an average daily volume of less than 1,000 vehicles. • ADDENDA II Environmental Impacts (Continued) Although there would be signs stating that the lot is for the use of Boeing employ- ees only, Boeing does not have a security patrol, nor does it have a permit system for parking lots outside of the plant grounds. • Construction activities would preclude the use of the lot and create short-term parking demands elsewhere. (13c) The Boeing Renton complex is served by METRO bus route numbers 55, 56, 107, 108, 155, 156, 240, and 340. The bus stops are shown on Figure 3. Creation of approximately 25 additional parking spaces (375 approximate future capacity - 350 present capacity = 25) would not tend to make automobile transportation more attrac- tive to those employees who are not presently using cars. Public transit ridership would not be significantly decreased. There is presently no sidewalk on the Logan Avenue North side of the site. The sidewalk to be constructed on this side will be an improvement for pedestrian circula- tion. The former railroad bed impeding pedestrian circulation across the lot will be removed. This will encourage Boeing employees parking on the east side of the lot to use the proposed sidewalk. Many Boeing employees presently parking on the east side of the lot cross Burnett Avenue to use the residential sidewalk on the east side of Burnett. The hazard of pedestrian/vehicle conflict in that location would therefore be reduced due to construction of the project. (13d) The proposed project may alter present patterns of circulation in the immediate vicinity because the improved parking facility would draw some Boeing employees that presently park elsewhere on Boeing property and in residential streets. Additional traffic due to the lot could possibly create congestion on access streets encouraging others to alter their customary routes. ADDENDA II Environmental Impacts (Continued) The use of short-term traffic diversions may result from construction activities. (13f) In the period from January 1972 through October 1979, there were 16 traffic accidents at the intersection of Logan Avenue North and North 4th Street; 14 accidents at Logan Avenue North and North 6th Street; 4 accidents at Burnett Avenue North and North 4th Street; and 2 accidents at Burnett Avenue North and North 6th Street. It is not known which of these accidents involved users of the existing parking lot. Increased parking lot use, accompanied by increased traffic congestion, will heighten the potential for traffic mishaps. On the other hand, the proposed curbing and controlling of access/egress points along Logan Avenue North and Burnett Avenue North will improve traffic safety in these streets. Presently there is no curbing on the Logan Avenue North side of the site. While there is curbing on the Burnett Avenue North side of the site, there is no access/egress control for cars parking in the right-of-way. At the present, cars can enter and leave Logan and Burnett Avenues at any point along the site. (14) Public Services (14a) Heavier traffic load caused by the use of the 375-car capacity of the renovated lot (approximately 175 vehicles per day over present usage of the existing facility) may cause additional road maintenance requirements. The potential need for such road maintenance already exists with the potential use of the exisiting combined capacity of the lot and street rights-of-way (350 spaces). (15) Energy (15a) and (15b) Only normal amounts of energy used in the construction of similar facilities will be used. Since the reconstructed lot will provide an additional 25 stalls over present combined capacity of the lot and street rights-of-way, there would ADD END A II Environmental Impacts (Continued) be a marginal increase in potential private car fuel consumption on the lot. (See Item II (13), Transportation, for discussion). In the greater neighborhood, however, fuel consumption is not expected to increase. The expected result of the project is the relocation of parking activity by Boeing employees, rather than the encouragement of private car use. (16) Utilities (16a), (16b), and (16c) Connections to existing utilities will be required for elec- tricity (overhead lighting), water (sprinklers), and storm drainage. It is not anticipated that the proposed project will significantly affect the existing capacities of these systems. (17) Human Health Increased traffic may increase the potential for traffic accidents; however, a well-designed parking lot with safety in mind will likely reduce the hazards of existing ad hoc parking on the site. These hazards include the conflict between through traffic on Logan and Burnett Avenues and traffic entering and leaving the site, and the conflict between pedestrians entering and leaving cars parked in the rights-of-way and street traffic. The proposed curbing on the east and west sides of the site will improve the existing conditions of Burnett Avenue North and Logan Street North. Localized air pollution may also be generated due to increased traffic - see item II (2a), Air for discussion. (18) Aesthetics The site as it currently exists is visually chaotic and unattractive. It is highly visible from both the residences along Burnett Avenue and the traffic along Logan Avenue. Each of the viewpoints demands a particular kind of visual quality from the site. From the Logan Avenue side, for the sake of better safety as well as aesthetics, there is a need to create a definite edge between the roadway and parking area, to ADD END A II Environmental Impacts (Continued) eliminate glare, and to define entry/exit points more clearly. From the Burnett Avenue side, there is a need to visually screen the traffic and parking activity from the residential area, and to ensure the presence of "greenery" between the residences and Logan Avenue. These visual elements would best be achieved through dense landscaping, i.e., the planting of trees and hedges along the edges of the development. On the other hand, dense vegetation may present a public safety problem, making emergency situations on the site (fires, crimes, accidents, and medical emergencies) invisible to passers-by and to residents along Burnett Avenue North. The landscaping to be designed for the site will provide a partial visual screen that will not be so dense as to create a public safety problem. Form 12� AFFIDAVIT STATE OF WASHINGTON ) The Boeing Company ) = (Name of Owner) COUNTY OF KING ) P. 0. Box 3707 (Mailing Address) Seattle, Washington 98124 (City) (State) 237-1013 (Telephone) I, Dale R. Graham being duly sworn, declare that I am the representative of the owner of property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and--the information here- with submitted are in all respects true and correc to the best of know edge and belief. j ^� gnature of Owner) SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO before me this _ /7 day of 19`J. �{$ts 't' A coP'- o r- iete °plilIv/1 LP..e1 1 C7. -moo ,QfCJ ' Z - i `2 No ublic i n r.d ''r tit . State of Washington, resi ing at/ . Rk4'✓ i izzoinsivicrosi ' 1 � Ci ' (Office Use Only) DEC 19 1979 - 1 Wi' CERTIFICATION -9,�,� /ivG Ds? Thi o certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me and has been found to be thorough and complete in every particular and to con- form to the rules and regulations of the Renton Building Department governing the filing of such application. Date received: 19 By \\.> Renton Building Department Revised January 1970