Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA80-032 MA BEGINNING OF FILE FILE TITLE SPECIAL. PERMIT SP• 03� - 80 5•E. CARNEP OF UNION AVE. NZ f N. E. 4J2 Sr GUlASURD� . DOMINIC 3�08 �80 '• A. '3't IIII, 1 1 • .- F, ,____ , .... Z3 _. 'f4-.,••,•.I,. • '-.9V'-•-. I-"Ala -,,.v'.,'s•.'•-'I ".d , .'.:.MO...E 'all P • ,c,„,,,, ". 16 .•.15- ;. .b.: .t I , • •:OM.• ' W ' .W _, ®i _ .i _ • , - 's"s, -_,_.,i. 26 25 24 29 22 21 20 19 lB 17 R. 3 WN 0 . . ____, \*-41411• . Mir"S lin'. gra egaterawArm:i - ' \6® waft EMS gm ry r PL.4i :n. • 12 l3 14•I5lli,l}.b.}7 IG9 20 21 22 29•• •. ...•_����g®_®®�_ Zn®®�1 a ®1� N,E. 6T�• P.L ' 0 _ q .�tz a=®i " E 3i::�. sss•eee Is. i ,� e Z i...:r::z I. 4, MI o' g®®4 1031i. . . II %0•9.•8•7C•6 S,��'� 2•� 12 I ae9 �'•7.L6 5 4 3 2'1 !';'•51 -�:'•2.:.. - -' S 1 ', .. tn 12 13 14 IS 1• 17 • 19 49 20 21 22JQ 13 14IS ►417(8 17 20 21 22 23Z4 •T. ., A:~YO 11�IL,I , _ ,-v',' S., b 7 8 �,C �i."�. u TT- Lf.€" ,t � ..: �R: laii�r Ja n.f:a—so::r—...-- il.f 1•;-.'z-3'-�;S' i;:T`a 9 • ' •1 i 1 L _ :� . 1 1 I I : �• 6 8 o r _ I I o 1• e ' r� .1 - M Z I I Z 1 '" 4a _• T- I I • . 11 } I• , I .. — ;i0 st '63 - _ •• •• I , I S . - _ • I - _ - S. - _ 128 - _I _ �� 1- - - r - ► 1 112 A F . G I I �� __ . GREENWOOD 1 1 0 . , ' I 1 j i'liFILrimr----r----4 ui 13 E ►� i 1 _ lli • • I " I • . I I. C D I I j• i . • . . 41 ‘ ► `i I . . • . , _ I . . • • , . 1�i I di • I I Q I I ti 0 I I ��4 0 To _ _ __ __TT r ,u I I Izr�23I•i,'12,l2Ol"I9 � l6Ilr�a�/3 IZ \ Y > W a • OF R.4, • .. w � THE CITY OF RENTON rrr r kah = MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 Z •.L`z o m BARBARA' Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR ® LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 9'O FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 09gTFD SEP��'JO August 18, 1980 • Mr. Dominic Colasurdo 3546 N. E. 4th Street Renton, WA , 98055 RE: File No. SP-032-80; Dominic Colasurdo; Special Permit. Dear Mr. Colasurdo: This is to notify you that the above referenced request, which was approved subject to conditions as noted on the Examiner's report of August 1 , 1980, has not been appealed within the time period established by ordinance. Therefore, this application is final and is being transmitted this date to the City Clerk for permanent filing. Sincerely, '472S \(CAV" --- Fred J . Kaufman Hearing Examiner cc: Planning Department City Clerk AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING State of Washington) ) County of King ) Marilyn J . Petersen , being first duly sworn, upon oath disposes and states: That on the 1st day of August , 19 80 , affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision. or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below-entitled application or petition. Subscribed and sworn thisJPday of 19ei Notary Public.n and " or the State of Washington, residing. at Renton Application, Petition or Case: File No. SP-032-80; Dominic Col asurdo (The mi.nwtea contain a Vat 06 the panties off. necond) r / , August 1 , 1980 OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION , APPLICANT: Dominic Colasurdo FILE NO. SP-032-80 LOCATION: South side of N.E. 4th Street approximately 160 feet east of Union Avenue N.E. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant requests approval of a special permit for fill and grade of approximately 2,000 cubic yards in preparation for construction of a future building in 1981 . SUMMARY OF ACTION: Planning Department Recommendation: Approval with conditions Hearing Examiner Decision: Approval with conditions PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department preliminary report was received by the REPORT: Hearing Examiner on July 23, 1980. • PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: • The hearing was opened on July 29, 1980 at 9:00a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and the applicant had received and reviewed the Planning Department report. Roger Blaylock, Associate Planner, reviewed the report, and entered the following exhibits into the record: Exhibit #1 : Application File containing Planning Department report and other pertinent documents Exhibit #2: Site Plan with staff comments Exhibit #3: Temporary Sedimentation Plan with staff comments Exhibit #4: Vicinity Map Referencing Section B.8 of the Planning Department report which discusses existing zoning of the property, the Examiner requested Mr. Blaylock to designate the R-3 portion. Utilizing Exhibit #2, Mr. Blaylock pointed out the residentially zoned property on the southernmost portion of the site, and indicated that the fill project will occur only on the B-1 zoned property. Referencing Section L.4.a. , which requliires approval of a temporary storm water sedimentation plan by the Public Works Department, Mr. Blaylock advised that due to submission of Exhibit #3 prior to the public hearing, the requirement has been met. The Examiner requested testimony by the applicant. Responding was: Dominic Colasurdo 3546 N.E. 4th Street Renton, WA 98055 Mr. Colasurdo indicated concurrence with recommendations contained in the Planning Department report. The Examiner requested comments in support or opposition to the application. There was no response. He then requested final comments from the Planning Department staff. Since no further comments were offered, the hearing regarding File No. SP-032-80 was closed by the Examiner at 9:20 a.m. SP-032-80 Page Two FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1 . The request is for approval of a special permit to place approximately 2,000 cubic yards of fill on a portion of an +82,755 square foot site. 2. The application file containing the application, SEPA documentation, the Planning Department report, and other pertinent documents was entered into the record as Exhibit #1 . 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , R. C.W. 43.21 .C. , as amended, a Declaration of Non-Significance has been issued for the subject proposal by the Environmental Review Committee, responsible official . 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the impact of this development. 5. There was no opposition to the proposal expressed. 6. All existing utilities are available and in close proximity. 7. The subject property is located on the south side of N.E. 4th Street approximately 160 feet east of Union Avenue N.E. 8. The site is generally level . There is a low area adjacent to N.E. 4th Street which the applicant has proposed to fill pursuant to Section 4-2305 of the Mining, Excavating and Grading Ordinance. 9. The subject site is zoned both B-1 (Business/Commercial ) and R-3 (Medium Density Multifamily) . The B-1 zoning fronts along N.E. 4th. The R-3 zoning lies along the south property line. 10. The Comprehensive Plan indicates that the area is suitable for commercial development. 11 . An intermittent stream crosses the site from the north to the south. 12. The fill will consist of approximately 2,000 cubic yards and will be placed along the northeast portion of the subject site as preparation for future development. Specific building plans have not been submitted for the subject site. 13. Temporary storm sedimentation plans have been submitted for the fill operation and have been approved by the Public Works Department. 14. Permanent storm drainage plans must be submitted for. the site to accommodate the flow generated by the seasonal stream. The applicant proposed to underground and culvert the stream. 15. The Police Department has recommended that the approximately 80 vehicle trips required for the fill operation be routed to the site via Union Avenue N.E. rather than the heavily traveled N.E. 4th Street. They also recommended that operations be curtailed prior to the evening peak traffic hours. 16. Section 4-2316 requires every effort to preserve both perennial and intermittent streams. The Comprehensive Plan at page 10 indicates that conservation and restoration of natural resources is a primary goal of the city. CONCLUSIONS: 1 . The applicant proposes to fill a low depression on the subject site with approximately 2,000 cubic yards of fill material . This will require about 80 vehicle trips. In doing so, the applicant will eliminate an intermittent stream. The applicant has failed to demonstrate that the elimination of a natural drainage system is required. Section 4-2316 of the Mining, Excavation and Grading Ordinance requires that "every effort" at preservation of natural water courses is required. The Comprehensive Plan has also indicated that natural features should be incorporated into new developments and such features should be preserved. The applicant has the burden of demonstrating that the ultimate plans for reuse of SF-u32-80 Page Three the site, cannot be reasonably altered to provide the continued vitality of the stream coursing through the subject site. 2. Undergrounding the stream will not aid in the retention of•other runoff which would have entered the stream through natural surface runoff. The continued loss of even minor and,temporary drainage systems has led to periodic flooding. Such flooding can be lessened or eliminated if natural drainage was minimally altered. 3. Unless the applicant is prepared to demonstrate that reasonable development cannot be designed for the subject property incorporating the natural drainage feature of this site, the intermittent stream must be protected. 4. In order to insure the daily removal of debris from the public roadway, a cash bond should be posted with the Department of Public Works for that purpose. 5. Since traffic i.n the afternoon rush hour could be hampered by the entrance and exit of fill vehicles, the operation should terminate prior to 3:00 p.m. and all access to the site should be via Union Avenue N.E. 6. Other than the plans to fill the natural stream, the applicant may fill and grade the site in preparation for further development. As conditioned, the filling and • grading of the subject site will not harm neighboring properties or the public health, safety or welfare. DECISION: The special permit to fill and grade the subject site is approved subject to: 1 . Posting of a cash bond in the amount of $1 ,000 (one thousand dollars) to insure the cleaning of debris off the roadway on a daily basis. 2. No vehicle shall enter or leave the site after 3:00 p.m. weekdays, and all access to the site shall be via Union Avenue N.E. 3. The plans, subject to the approval of the Planning and Public Works Departments, shall be changed to protect the intermittent stream. ORDERED THIS 1st day of August, 1980. AN.A-S Fred J. K fman Land Use Hearing Examiner TRANSMITTED THIS 1st day of August, 1980 by Affidavit of Mailing to the parties of record: Dominic Colasurdo, 3546 N.E. 4th Street, Renton, WA 98055 TRANSMITTED THIS 1st day of August, 1980 to the following: Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director • Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director Michael Porter, Planning Commission Chairman Ron Nelson, Building Division Supervisor Lawrence J . Warren, City Attorney Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before August 15, 1980. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of -the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant',. and the Examiner may, after review•of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City 'Clerk accompanying a filing fee of $25.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall , or same may be purchased at cost in said department. • PLANNING DEPARTMENT � PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING - JULY 29 , 1980 PAGE TWO D . PHYSICAL 3 AEKGRB®W1ND: 1 . Topography : The subject site is generally level except for a depression in the area to be filled . 2 . Soils : Alderwood gravely Sandy Loam (AgC) , Permeability is moderately rapid in the surface layer and subsoil and very slow in the substratum . Runoff is slow to moderate and the erosion hazard is moderate . This soil is used for timber, pasture , berries , row crops , and for urban development . 3 . Vegetation : Virtually all of the natural vegetation on site has been removed . What remains consists principally of scrub grass . 4 . Wildlife : The existing vegetation provides minimal , if any , habitat forarea wildlife . 5 . Water : No surface water was observed on the subject site (July 16 , 1980 ) . The subject: area is a seasonal stream flowing from north to south. 6 . Land Use : The site is presently vacant . E . - NEIGW,ORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS : : The surrounding properties are in a transitional state from undeveloped and large-lot single family uses to light commercial and some multiple family . F , PUBLIC SERVICES : 1 . Water and Sewer : A 4" water main extends east-west on N .E . 4th Street adjacent to the subject site and a 16" main runs north-south on Union Avenue adjacent to the property . An 8" sanitary sewer is also located along N .E . 4th Street within 1 ,000 feet to the west of the site . • 2 . Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Department as per ordinance requirements. 3 . Transit : Metro Transit Route 107 operates along . Union Avenue N . E . within 1/4 mile to the north of the subject site . 4 . Schools : Not applicable . 5 . Recreation : Not applicable . G . A1IPPLI(G/AXLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING C[WE: 1 . Section 4-711 , B-1 , Business Use 2 . Section 4-709A, R-3, Residence Multiple Family . 3 . Section 4-722B, Special Permits H . AAPPLItME SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLMI OR OTHERS OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT: 1 . Comprehensive Plan, 1965 , Land Use Report , Objective 6, page 18 . I . IIMP!`ZT OF THE NATURAL OR HUMAN ENVIRONMENT : 1 . Natural Systems : Filling of the• site and under- grounding of the stream will disturb soils and vegetation , increase storm water runoff, and increase traffic and noise levels in the area on a temporary basis . However , through proper development controls and procedures , these impacts can be mitigated . Implementation of the fill could be a precedent for future removal of the streams natural character . PUNNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEVING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING JULY 29 , 1980 APPLICANT : DOMINIC COLASURDO FILE NUMBER : SP-032-80 A . SUMMARY & PURPOSE OF REQUEST: : The applicant requests approval of a Special Permit for fill and grade of approximately 2 ,000 cubic yards in preparation for construction of a future building in 1981 . B . GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record : DOMINIC J. COLASURDO 2 . Applicant : DOMINIC J . COLASURDO dr 3 . Location : South side of N .E . (Vicinity Map Attached) 4th Street approximately 160 feet east of Union Ave . N.E. 4. Legal Description : A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Planning Department . . 5 . Size of Property : +82, 755 sq . ft . 6 . Access : Via .N .E . 4th Street . 7 . Existing Zoning : B-1 , Business Use ; R-3 , Residence Multiple Family ; Minimum lot size 5, 000 sq . ft . 8 . Existing Zoning in the Area : B-1 , Business Use ; R-3 , Residence Multiple Family ; G , General Classification District . 9. Comprehensive Land Use Plan : Commercial 10 . Notification : The application was notified in writing of the hearing date . Notice was properly published in the Seattle Times on July 16 , 1980 , and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City ordinance on July 16 , 1980 . C . WISTORY/tBAAD;RSGROU D : The subject site was annexed into the 'City by Ordinance 2308 of March 16, 1967 . It was rezoned from G to B-1 and R-3 by Ordinance 2317 of April 13, 1967 . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING - JULY 29 , 1960 PAGE FOUR c. . Fill material in the public right-of-way for N .E . 4th Street is to be no higher than the adjacent roadway and be Class B pit run . 5 . The placement of only 2 ,000 cubic yards of fill does not appear significant . However , the fill is to be placed in a natural drainage area . The placement of that drainage into underground culverts addresses the functional engineering of the situa- tion . However , it does not address the aesthetic impacts of removing the natural area nor the cumu- lative impacts of undergrounding the entire natural drainage system . Functionally natural drainage areas could be either a land use separation or focal points in various stages of urban development . The 1965 Comprehensive Plan specifically sets forth as a policy that "significant" natural areas, be retained within development . The level of the significance of this particular stretch of stream is probably minor . However , the cumulative effect of similar "minor" disruptions to the natural stream system could be considered unacceptable. Due to the current intrusion of urban uses and activity into this specific area, the special permit should be approved . M . DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATIONS: Based upon the foregoing analysis , the Planning Department recommends that the applicant ' s request for a special permit to fill and grade , file SP-032-80 , be approved subject to the conditions listed in L-3 and L-4. a , PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING - JULY 29 , 1980 PAGE THREE 2 . Population/Employment : The fill and grade permit will have no direct impact on employment . However , future use of the filled site will have to be addressed upon specific development . 3 . Schools : Not applicable . 4. Social : Not applicable . 5 . Traffic : Assuming 25 cubic yards per trip , approxi- mately 80 vehicle trips will be expected for the filling operation . J . ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION: Pursuant to the City of Renton ' s Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended, RCW 43-21C, a declaration of non-significance was issued for the subject proposal by the City Environmental Review Committee on July 9 , 1980 . K . AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED : 1 . City of Renton Building Division 2 . City of Renton Engineering Division 3 . City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division 4. City of Renton Utilities Division 5 . City. of Renton Fire Department L . PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1 . The proposal is consistent with the land use element of the Comprehensive Plan which designates the site as commercial . 2 . The applicant ' s proposal is to pre-load the northeast portion of the site with approximately 2 ,000 cubic yards of fill material prior to the actual construction of the commercial building. The applicant does not propose any building plans at the present time . 3 . The Police Department has reviewed the proposal and suggested the following conditions : a . Access to the site be from Union Avenue N . E . for the purposes of the fill operation . b . No truck access to N . E . 4th Street during the fill operation at all due to the heavy traffic on N.E . 4th Street . , c . Union Avenue N .E . be signed with the proper signing as determined by the Traffic Engineering Division . d . The roadway is to be kept clear of dirt and debris at all times . e . Hours of operation not to extend past 3 :00 p .m . 4 . The Public Works Department has reviewed the plans submitted and required the following conditions : a . Approval of a temporary storm water sedimentation plan . b . Approval of a storm water drainage plan (see plan comments ) . OPWrj Plannl r ti 12-1975 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT ' DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET . • . • Application:APPl i cation: SieW7,01Z P msr (. ppO.Tc "S9 Fir-AV/if ek. g gyro. d 3.t" J..‘ i ' x ' d0 er Loca,ti on Appl i cant: Calm S'r %'�Ala A e • • TO: Parks Department • SCHEDULED WEARING C.57/0/4 Police Department A. U. MEETING DATE : AWN!) Public Works Department engineering Division Traffic Engineering Building Division Utilities Engineering Fire Department (Other) : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN mu-mama APPLICATION Rgvigw CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON eg, AT V:UU AiM. IN THE THIRD. FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM. IF YOUR DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE T IzTEND THE ARC, ASE V D PLE ROO HE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY �:UU P.M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: --�-{ Approved x Approved with Conditions Not Approved p4 dre SAIV Ne04.t 62 m,4 e-s • ��l�y. o✓w.v.3 .S'rt1Nr,,ti ta"0- h1...444/T t ate-e'd,.T 1 .4.c czt- Signature of Director or Author zed Repre en ative Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved • • Sinnifiira of nirOt+nt. no 111146....4 .a..d n g. 4.1 '_ a._ �_ IT 1 , LSI il V..1 i:7 .1 1 .-• 2 — 31 I i i I 1 ..‹P i I. 135110 9 9(Y. 23coi 1 I 1 1 I 1--- 122 3 L4 7 . ':::I° " IL EEO . .1 04. I I 1 I 0 it. I I L_. . _ *TO ' i 16 iliannirElrffilrlarm.alii.-1= _ I t_11 • S 1.6 7-a 9 / 1 • 1.. _ . , 1 I I • 1 _ I 1, _ 1.. .i I I i I 1 • 1 1 I 1 1 1 ' \ I I • r , , • I ..1 1 . . 1 1 1 1 1 —.1...—.......---r. 1 -- .... t. 14111, -.! "...15• .1 , 1 ..- 1 1 7 I I 1 I tb" .. 4.1- . -• ,...:g IV it I ..: I . - ••1 gt VO., 1 • .- - _ j I . L .E. , .....-. _ S T 4 la, MI • - _ ,_ r - I2 I .. ,., e.ti,. ,..,., : 1 0. 1 1 • ,,,, A i F . G 1 I • ... 4 _ . I • . , 1 G RE ENW OOD . -1-Li , , ., . ... . vi _. . 1 I I I .... 1 1 CEI, M E.--)-E.RY i , „ , _ .. ... !___7 T_....!_.,,- I 1 • i I . . I I . • • • i . I ,----1 1 __ • I • C D I I I - I , I di _ _ I i , .).., ______. _ _____ ,,, , I -tir11-1 41 . / . - f >IP • i t i I I . t St I.. . I I - I t . i i I I. t. I `irwo Planntr 12-197c' a RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET . . App1i cation: Sdo'('mc uxir ($P.O3 -:4 ,50—Avi 0 e .5.>4 Location• ; . 7', , , '` ,,.:: ' 4960 e . r a ,,5 . Applicant: eedit abler,,. • ;-sei pj arg/. ett TO: Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: 60. _ Police Department A.R.C. MEETING DATE: _ `;./ ' ` Public Works Department Engineering Division Traffic Engineering !/UBu-iill'"ding Division . tilities Engineering i Fire Department (Other) : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD .BE PROVIDED IN WRITA1iO1 o APPLICATIOAATR9: UWACMNFIN E THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM. IF YOUR DEP RTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE TQ TEND THE ARC, D PLEASE PROV THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5:OU P.M. ON f �'(I14 • REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : --_---iili-,::37-_-_:-• Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved . --�- //L O/` <S 7 ��.t l �a�. , ;\ / . Signature of Director or Authorized Representative bate I 1• REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 1.'(D`4 `,-( Approved Approved with Conditions Not Ap proved PI t4 /i-A1' 4 . • . 4/2,i(90 Signature f Director or Authorized Representative Date • f Plannin 12-1979 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT • DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEWW SHEET . App11 cation : $x r ( p. 3a-19 e vit9 eS 4 �r �r®A A. / S vie ,/eeti ' v°.10 50 Location! Are Appl i cant: Cliht Sore& 6mmili2�•� TO: Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE :, 64.1A Police Department A.R.C. MEETING DATE: .�/�1�0 Public Works Department Engineering Division Traffic Engineering }} ilding Division . Utilities Engineering Fire Department (Other) : • COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN . WRIT 1FO 2; APPLICATION R V1 W CONFERENCE ARC) TO BE HELD ON AT p A M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM. IF YOUR DEP RTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE TO ATTEND THE ARC, PLEASE PROVIDEETHE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 7:OU P.M. ON gal° REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 17 Approved X Approved with Conditions Not Approved 4 ') �� s. ) ; ' �, ' _ ) 7`/4-- C. c. r� of �c..� t�l) ��. -z, j�� C. � C� .�� C�. 1- SLc?i 'c=.S !/l •� i c. rk Teti/' C<., t-'i.-t%/.5/-/�-. I� C�.= L. L=_ �f �. � (�r`\/`� 0iZe� /���� Cc`C:== (�L'" l:i�le /C: �t,C= d �')/L'tf FJA-r l r1 C, //l_.'<:j r/ 7/2� �i/ !`� 1C (J.?.1e D- T < I /-z Signature--of. Director or Authorize Representative Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Plannfn 12-1979 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET . Application: $A e'/Ae ogmir- ($kA.6 9r ri fire . i c'x /co ' rieleee Location ' . :. hal Applicant: etila tar b:"-,�° ;�- `11�,q TO: _ Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : CT�f�/�`°� �f r' Police Department A.R.C. MEETING DATE : . : ,5"���k0 Public Works Department Engineering Division / 0" Traffic Engineering , f" r\ ' C>�, Building Division 17 MO Utilities Engineering '', :etmt Deparen q <<,; r) : ' COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS. APPLICA ION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITI 0plIE APPLICATION R V W CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON '�p AT U:UU A.N. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM. IF YOUR DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE T ITENDTHEARC, PLEASE PROOV D 1 THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5:UU P.M. ON to g .„ REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION POLICE Approved , xxx Approved with Conditions Not Approved t) Access to the site be off off Union N.E. for purnores �f the fn11 operation 2) No truck access to N.E. 4th during the fill operation at all due to the heavy traffic on N.E. 4th 3) Union Ave. N.E. be signed with the proper signing as determined by the traffic eng. . • 4) Roadway to be kept clear of dirt & debri at all times. 4' Signature of Director or AuthorizedLtc � e n21�7'. Representative ate 5) Hours of operation not to extend past 3 : 00 P.M. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved Approved with Conditions - Not Approved • Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date WW9k, P1 anni n 12-1979 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIE►WW SHEET Appli cation : Si, e'efig 4%FA, - 9y (rose. / are ID ° X fa Location : 9 $ o dtt i' glee ° •A Applicant : /2 .69,40a ;41 10c TO: Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 6// �.8 Police Department A. R.C. MEETING DATE : l f Public Works Department En .veering Division 4 Traffic Engineering • Building Division Utilities Engineering Fire Department (Other) : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITI 0 THE APPLICATION REV EW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON 1Q�4; AT 9:00 A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM. IF YOUR DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE TQ A TEND THE ARC, PLEASE PROVIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : on"' X Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved :/)/ • ^ � 9® Signature of Director or Authorize Representative Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date • FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE Application No (s ) : . ..8 �S�'w�323.2 - 01�. Environmental Checklist No : ECF-555-80 Description of .,Proposal : To fill an area in preparation for future development - Proponent : tODMINIrdOiAt06077 Location of Proposal : South side of N .E . 4th Street approx . 160 ' East of Union Avenue N .E . Lead Agency : PLANNING DEPARTMENT This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on July 2 , 1980 following a presentation by Steve Munson of the Planning Department . Comments were accepted from: Written: Comments were received from Utilities Engineering. Incorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings of the ERC on application ECF-555-80 are the following: 1 ) Environmental Checklist Review Sheet, prepared by: Steve Munson, Assistant Planner , Dated April 21 , 1980 • 2 ) Applications : Sp-032-80 3 ) Recommendations for a declaration of non-significance : Moved by Warren G. Gonnason declaration of non-significance be issued; John Webley and Gordon Y. Ericksen concurred. • Acting as the Responsible Official , the ERC has determined this development does not have significant adverse impact on the environment . An EIS is not required under RCW 43 .21C.030(2) (c) . This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a complete environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Reasons for declaration of environmental non-significance : No adverse impacts on the site or surro nding properties . Signatures : / �,. ) )- C } hn E . Webley , Perks Director0 Gor on . Xen, Planning Direct ' )7e ,/,/: W ren C . Gonnason , Director Public Works Department DATE OF PUBLICATION : July 9 , 1980 EXPIRATION OF APPEAL PERIOD : July 23, 1980 OF R4, THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 oeel BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH. MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 4 co' 235- 2550 O1 eo SEP-r .. • July 15 , 1980 Dominic J . Colasurdo 3546 N .E . 4th Renton , Washington 98055 Re : APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT TO FILL AN AREA FOR FUTURE COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE B-1 ZONE , File SP-032-80 ; property located on the south side of N .E . 4th Street approximately 160 feet east of Union Avenue N .E . Dear Mr . Colasurdo : The Renton Planning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on July 2 , 1980 . A public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner has been set for July 29 , 1980 , at 9 :00 a .m . Representatives of the applicant are asked to be present . All interested persons are invited to attend the hearing . If you have any further questions , please call the Renton Planning Department , 235-2550 . Very truly yours , Gordon Y . Ericksen, Planning Director B y : �,q,.. Roger J . Blaylock Associate Planner • RJB :wr cc : Miles Drake 302 Scenic Way Kent , WA 98031 uOr' ,A • i 'S r'#KapSN .'i • 11 s+ { 7< +tW„ If.s i•i 51.• ' � � � z .�'• yy 1 • i • ar i • • • :.+. r ay 5 * 5 k fY a ' " a,ry" `/A �: �H:� 'D~ 7k ` ,Lr.i, ` ' e = 2i- 2 GENERAL LOCATION: AND, OR ADDRESS: PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF N.E . 4TH STREET APPROXIMATELY 160 FEET EAST OF UNION AVENUE N .E. ' LEGS.. DESCRIPTION: LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON FILE IN THE RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT. •• I S POSTED TO NOTIFY PROPERTY OWNERS OF p . • Li • TO BE HELD • IN CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, MUNICIPAL BUILDING • JULY 29 , 1980 9 :00 A.M. ®N BEGINNING AT CONCERNING ITEM • . ■ EZONE SPECI & PERIVUT TO FILL AND GRADE • Si . E APPRO VAL • WAIVER • SHOEUNE ;/E :`is'ENT PEMIT • FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL 235 2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT DOPER AUTHORIZATION NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER • RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL , RENTON , WASHINGTON , ON JULY 29 , 1980 , AT 9 :00 A .M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS : 1 . DOMINIC J. COLASURDO , application for special permit to fill an area for future commercial development in the B-1 zone, File SP-032-80 ; property located on the south side of N .E . 4th Street approximately 160 feet east of Union Ave . N .E . 2 . DR . SAN LWAI , application for site approval for medical office building in P-1 zone , File SA-059-80 ; property located approximately 1100 feet north of S .W. 43rd St . on the west side of Talbot Road South (Parcel B of the Dr . Brain Short Plat 213-78 ) . 3 . DR . SAN LWAI , application for special permit for parking lot and landscaping in P-1 zone , File SP-060-80 ; property located approximately 1101 feet north of S .W. 43rd St . on the west side of Talbot Road South (Parcel B of the Dr . Brain Short Plat 213-78 ) . 4. DOUGLAS A. WESTON, application for four-lot short plat approval in R-1 zone , File 061-80 ; property located in the vicinity of 338 Renton Avenue South . 5 . DOUGLAS A. WESTON, application for exception to Subdivision Ordinance regarding pipestem lots , File E-062-80 ; property located in the vicinity of 338 Renton Avenue South . 6 . RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT, application for rezone from G-7200 to R-3 for the purpose of future multiple family development , File R-048-80 ; property located on the east side of Benson Road South, south of S .W. 23rd Street . Legal descriptions of files noted above are on file in the Renton Planning Department . ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON JULY 29 , 1980 , AT 9 :00 A . M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS . PUBLISHED : July 16 , 1980 GORDON Y. ERICKSEN, RENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR CERTIFICATION I , STEVE MUNSON , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST : Subscribed and sworn to before me , a Notary Public , in and for the State of Washington residing in King County , on the llth day of July, 1980 . SIGNED : 7i, FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE Application No (s ) : Environmental Checklist No : ECF-555-80 Description of Proposal : To fill an area in preparation for future development Proponent : DOMINIC COLASURDO Location of Proposal : South side of N .E . 4th Street approx . 160 ' East of Union Avenue N .E . Lead Agency : PLANNING DEPARTMENT This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on July 2 , 1980 following a presentation by Steve Munson of the Planning Department . Comments were accepted from: Written Comments were received from Utilities Engineering . Incorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings of the ERC on application ECF-555-80 are the following : 1 ) Environmental Checklist Review Sheet , prepared by : Steve Munson , Assistant Planner, Dated April 21 , 1980 2 ) Applications : Sp-032-80 3 ) Recommendations for a declaration of non-significance : Moved by Warren G. Gonnason declaration of non-significance be issued ; John Webley and Gordon Y. Ericksen concurred. Acting as the Responsible Official , the ERC has determined this development does not have significant adverse impact on the environment . An EIS is not required under RCW 43.21C .030 (2) (c ) . This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a complete environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Reasons for declaration of environmental non-significance : No adverse impacts on the site or surro nding properties . fr Signatures : ,,. F k_04-k)- hn E . Webley , Par Director ,, ' Gor on E. f en, Planning Direc/t/vir W ren C . Gonnason , Director Public Works Department DATE OF PUBLICATION : July 9 , 1980 EXPIRATION OF APPEAL PERIOD : July 23, 1980 1 NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a final declaration of non-significance for the following projects : 1 . DOMINIC COLASURDO (ECF-555-80 ) , application for special permit to fill an area for future commercial development in the B-1 zone; File No . SP-032-80 ; property located on the south side of N .E . 4th Street approximately 160 feet east of Union Avenue N .E . 2 . RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT (ECF-570-80 ) , application for rezone from G-7200 to R-3 for the purpose of future multiple family development ; File No . R-048-80 , property located on the east side of Benson Road South, south of S .W. 23rd Street . 3 . DR . SAN LWAI (ECF-577-80) , application for site approval for medical office building (File No . SA-059-80 ) and application for special permit for parking lot and landscaping in P-1 Zone (File No . SP-060-80 ) ; property located approximately 1101 feet north of S .W. 43rd Street on the west side of Springbrook Road (Parcel "B" of the Dr . Brain Short Plat #213-78 ) . Further information regarding this action is available in the Planning Department , Municipal Building, Renton , Washington , 235-2550 . Any appeal of ERC action must be filed with the Hearing Examiner by July 23 , 1980 . Published : July 9 , 1980 OF RA, �y z THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON.WASH.98055 oisms BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH. MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 90 (cr 235- 2550 94, April 23, 1980 Dominic J. Colasurdo 3546 N.E. 4th Street Renton, Washington 98055 Dear Mr. Colasurdo: Regarding your application for a Special Permit to fill and grade (SP-032-80), we need more information from you. Specifically, we require profiles and cross- sections of the fill area and the items described on the enclosed list. These must be provided in order for our department to issue an environmental declaration and further process your application. Your timely submittal of the requested items will assist us in expediting your application. If you need assis- tance, please contact our office. Very truly yours, Gordon Y. Ericksen Planning Director Steve Munson Assistant Planner SM:wr Enclosure ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE APRIL 23, 1980 AGENDA COMMENCING AT 10 :00 A.M. : THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM 1 . NEW BUSINESS : ECF-555-80 DOMINIC J. COLASURDO SP-032-80 Application for special permit to fill and grade in B-1 and R-3 zones ; property located south side of N . E . 4th Street approximately 160 feet east of Union Avenue N .E . ECF-556-80 MAY CREEK ASSOCIATES R-037-80 Application for rezone from G-9600 to R-2 for purpose of future construc- tion of 26 townhouse duplexes ; property located in the vicinity of 4904 Lake Washington Blvd. N.E . (Tract 181 ) , adjacent to and north of S.E . 76th Street. ECF-546-80 BRADY INTERNATIONAL HARDWOODS COMPANY SP-011-80 Applications for special permit SA-012-80 to fill and grade in M-P zone and site approval for a 72 , 370 sq. ft . warehouse/office facility ; property located on the east side of Lind Avenue S.W. , 550 feet north of S .W. 34th Street. ECF-562-80 DENNIS SMART Tentative Plat Application for tentative plat approval 042-80 in L-1 zone (Lot #1 of Walker mountain Short Plat 373-79) ; property located on southeast corner of Jefferson and N.E. 4th Street . ECF-542-80 CITY OF RENTON WELLS AVENUE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT Construction of a new four-lane bridge on North Wells , where it crosses the Cedar River. Date circulated : 7/Z//Ao Comments due : V/233,/gQ ENVIRONMENTAL CHECNCLIST REVIEbd SWEET • E C F - ,SS.-- Po APPLICATION No(s) . 5 P 4 3a -g PROPONENT: (DApvi C 63/2S0r'4o PROJECT TITLE: S/ E7, _ 1 E2ftl ( T-` e-�'® . F•/1 44 Brief Description of Project : 7n �'; 1la.� �,.e— /y` rera 4;iv.1 L0CAT ION : S. s,d 616 Ate' g&re5.74. a/,or®x • A(t9 ', e'fam. ,4v' '677 SITE AREA: /36"XioDe,letile/rei) BUILDING AREA (gross) DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3) Water & water courses : 4) Plant life : 5) Animal life: 6) Noise : 7) Light & glare : 8) Land Use ; north : east : �aC $i �c' vm. south: ` e • west : (59,-r to(1.-Li teNx-S?U" ✓ ,/ Land use conflicts : b-110. Ser►1 4.,,f1t¢ I1e.. •.47�i,� �F,icy; refsecc View obstruction : HOY, -t 9) Natural resources : 10) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : �� 13) Trip ends (ITE) : traffic impacts : 14) Public services: 15 ) Energy: 16) Utilities: 17) Human health: 18) Aesthetics: 19) Recreation: 20) Archeology/history : COMMENTS • caSieAn rxe40.0v.e S QCrC %�+Pdr1 1 • • Recommendation; DNSI DOS More Information Reviewed by: a..,e 714Title : j153 5 //e+kd'r Date : 171/01//g0 FORM: ERC-06 • • Date circulated : 9l2//RO Comments due : y/,Z,A9 ENUVIRONMEINTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - 5S.5"- Po . 1 APPLICATION No(s) . ' P O 3 -S D PROPONENT: .1)/l rv1 i n. eC L4/'eg St/Pio PROJECT TITLE: ..5-Aere//fi- P I1'1I7 E'o ri l( . Brief Description of Project : 7r4; lrptt, ac,ye.4- iry roes'. b., LOCATIONS. Sio✓Peil d4Kg7Z4eJ pAroft . % feerdofilrt � 4AP- SITE AREA: /3.5 'X/OD'X 4140pe4 BUILDING AREA (gross) 1 DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR ' MAJOR MORE • / _ INFO 1) Topographic changes: 2) Direct/Indirect air. quality : '/ 3) Water & water courses: i 4) Plant life: v/ 5) Animal life: . 6) Noise: _ v _ • 7) Light & glare : 8) Land Use ; north: • ' east: ' south: • west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9) Natural, resources : 10) Risk of upset:. J 11 ) Population/Employment : . v/ 12 ) Number of Dwellings : `/- 13) Trip ends CITE) : traffic impacts : 14) Public ,services: (// 15) Energy :' ✓ - . • 16) Utilities: r/ _ -a • 17) Human Health: �/ 18) Aesthetics: (/ 19) Recreation: 4 20) Archeology/history: `� COMMENTS: • I . Recommendation: D I_ -7 DOS More Information_____ i Reviewed by • Mi ; Title : i ' Dote : 5/VP li FORM: ERC-06 Date circulated : 40//0P Comments due : " //4/e® ENVIIROMIIIENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW! SHEET ECF - , 55"- 3.0 .. APPLICATION No (s ) . tS , 3c?-'3 ® PROPONENT : CO/a 44,,rp/OJ AP971107/e / �J/)} //// 44,'",x• PROJECT TITLE : 400pct•� ( d4 r �If r '(Cd/r9�d-. /3� lam, ° s.9 Brief Description of Project : 474/A, c i, •0'1,5 c6P e t . /04 /fel/ .2,e-reAril A ee,a4.4.14-Ty 6 kcy4,-, 06 16.silic),,,,,A0(arti 1,,, Ivy. LOCATION : SS'°ale , Y>s/c 2,1e / t ®'Bel afi nay: // SITE AREA : .4e„9f 73"15' BUILDING AREA (gross) DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE ,� INFO 1) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3) Water & water courses : 4✓ 4) Plant life : • -..-' 5) Animal life : U� 6) Noise : 7) Light & glare 8) Land Use ; north: T�KeLcc. Scli.'1ere S 'o,-• east : SCa SJ4,1 Fe • /ee3'0 ,Iaa c-es south: i-rnso,,�goap 42". (stfi west : I-aYti:'ce' cJ17,• an.kt Land use conflicts : — View obstruction : ,�-a- o- 9) Natural resources : 1.,S. 10) Risk of upset : t/ 11 ) Population/Employment : . / '''p 12 ) Number of Dwellings : _ • 13) Trip ends (ITE) : . traffic impacts : 14) Public services : IS - 15) Energy : 1/' '--d 16) Utilities : • ,i/ � 17) Human health : j'' . 18) Aesthetics : 19) Recreation : 4....-'- 20) Archeology/history : 4/ 5 COMMENTS : Recommendation : �DNSI DOS More Information Reviewed by : � 'u�i-e 2 - _ ,1_- Title : af,--0,e-L---qa.,j/Zz.- s-7 Date : �1��iP4 ptEiCi- \\\ CITY OF RENTON \--v APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT 60 10 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY .c.„4 V @� • File No . SP-'p34"P() Date Rec ' d. Application Fee $ Receipt No . Environmental Review Fee $ APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 6 : /fvvrr e 7-- -3S-3 3 1 . Name IDD/4-7/0/ .. J (?o1 s4,po7U Phone2G/S 7-2— - 86-CD Address 334t /�Lc -7 R�1�av, 1 ' h 2 . Property location F-7'De71. p /� a 7 3.- Legal description (attach additional sheet if necessary) --- - - - r - - -- -- - ---- -- - --- - - - -- - THE NORTH 3/5 OF THE WEST IIALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE- NORTHWEST - U(11('I'I;I( Ol I'lll'; NOIrTII HVET Q11ARTEk O1 EECT1cN 1`j, 'l'OEiNHllll' 23 NO1ITII, RANGE 5 NAST, ld.f`:., IN K.ING COUNTY, NIAS111.NGI'ON. EXCEPT THE NORTH 30 FEET AND THE WEST 30 FEET THEREOF FOR COUNTY ROADS, AND EXCEPT THE SOUTH 12 FEET OF THE NORTH 42 FEET OF SAID NORTH 3/5 CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY FOR S.E. 120TH STREET BY DEED RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILES NO. 5853034, AND EXCEPT TILE SOUTH 140 FEET OF THE NORTH 182 H r FEET OF THEEAST 160 FEET OF THE 1�1I:;�T 1 y0 FEET OF SAID NORTH OF TI-i,_- l'J1EST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST-QUARTER OF THE NORTH:EST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTIO4 15. 4 . Number of acres or square feet KZl7-s-3 -"/, 7T Present Zoni-ng I - 5 . What do-yr-ou propose to develop on this property? (4,-, e c' ic/cea TOO- /-/441`e. 6 . The following information shall be submitted with this application : A. Site and access plan (include setbacks , Scale existing structures , easements , and other factors limiting development) 1" = 10 ' or 20 ' B. Parking, landscaping and screening plan 1" = 10 ' C. Vicinity map (include land use and zoning on adjacent parcels) 1" = 200 ' to 80.0 ' D. Building height and area (existing and proposed) . E. A special permit required by the Renton Mining , Excavation and Grading Ordinance shall submit the information listed in Section 4-2307 . 5 in addition to. the above . 7 . LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER'S ACTION: Date Approved Date Denied • Date Appealed Appeal Action Remarks Planning Dept. \ 1-77 1 _ 0:0 UFO AFFIDAVIT b Ifqip (46 -.1.... \.\-z., -., 0 / ��FPA RTME� I , 7)0j44/' /d_ V (l© k? S/,llr'p/e , being duly sworn-7. are that I am the owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sworn before me this/¢II/ day of /1./ / fre'hj , 19 PO , Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Re, Ij ( Y/ . P-- I . WaE: o/f Notary Pub (Signature Owner 6/2 A< . 6 '°�.-4 R-eiw, 1/mot , ,..3C-4 & /V �- %. (Address) (Address) kG'77L G� sGr (City) / (State) .2.— y tz:, - F(a 6 O (Telephone) (FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me and has been found to be thorough and complete in every particular and to conform to the rules Ve ations of the Renton Planning Department governing the fili . jif s h!ya lication . ag.5b Date Received ( ,,,, , 9 By : '�l1P,R 26 l�u �- 661 P• .0 H� NAM � `14/ DE�4 Renton Planning Dept . 2-73 • • -2- 7. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts , including any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ- mental setting of the proposal ) : 215' frontage on Union Ave. N.E. is level with road — 135' frontage on N.E. N.E. 4th is about 5' below grade. 8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal : December 1, 1980 9. List' of all permits, licenses or government approvals required for the proposal (federal ,, state and local--including rezones) : Land fill permit Storm design. appro,Na1 10. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes , explain: Yes — A building of somekind will probably be built sometime in 1981. 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain: No 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal ; ifinone has been completed, but is expected to be filed' at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: None 1 . II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) f (1) Earth. Will the proposal result -in: (a) Unstable earth conditions' or in changes in geologic X substructures? YES MAYBE NO (b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or over- covering of ,the soil? YES MAYBE NO (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief X features? ES MAYBE NO (d) The destruction,, covering or modification of any X unique geologic or physical features? YES MAYBE NO (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? X • YES MAYBE N0 (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands , or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or .stream or the X bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: A small portion of said property will hP- filled, this will change that mart of topngrarhy_ Thi overall slope and runoff will remain the same_ CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM ®F R��2, • 0 FLULI Eo , • mp,R 28 1980 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY -15 -"_ " 'f'—® 4 Application No. -1�® ` ° Environmental Checklist No. ..ed ---.1 :,�vr PROPOSED, date: FINAL , date: Declaration of Significance � Declaration of Significance. EjDeclaration of Non-Significance Ei Declaration of Non-Significance COMMENTS: Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals. The Act also requires that an EIS be prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele- vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with- out unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal, not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. ` This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with- out duplicating paperwork in the future. NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals. . Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal . If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM I. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent Dominic J. Colasurdo 2. Address and phone number of Proponent: • Business: 3546 N.E. 4th Street. Renton, Washingrtnn 9gn55 29A-A650 Home: 15440 S.E. May Valley Rd. Renton, Washington 98055 25 5-3533 • 3. Date Checklist submitted 4. Agency requiring Checklist • 5: Name of proposal , if applicable: 6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature) : Land fill area about 1351 X 1001 and about 4 feet deep and i n stall storm drains. • -4- (5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversity of species , or numbers of ' any species of fauna (birds , land animals including reptiles, fish and, shellfish, benthic organisms , insects or microfauna)? • • YES MAYBE NO (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? X YES MAYBE NO (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or ,result in a barrier to the migration or movement . of fauna? X YES MAYBE NO (d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: • (7) Light and Glare. • Will the proposal produce new light or glare? .. YES MAYBE NO Explanation: • (8) Land Usei Will the proposal result in the alteration of the • present or planned land use of an area? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? YES MAYBE NO (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? X YES MAYBE NO • Explanation: . i • (10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion, or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? YES MAYBE NO • Explanation: (11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- • bution, density, or growth rate of the human population • of an area? X YET— MAYBE NO Explanation: • -3- ,(2) Air. Will the proposal result in:, (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? X YES MAYBE NO (b) The creation of objectionable odors? X YES MAYBE NO (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature,, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: • • (3) Water. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in currents, or the course of direction of water movements, in either marine' or fresh waters? YES MAYBE NO (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns , or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? X YES MAYBE NO (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? YES MAYBE N (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? x YES MAYBE NO (e) Discharge into surface waters , or in any alteration surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? x YES MAYBE NO (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? YES MAYBE (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either through direct additions or withdrawals , or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? X YES MAYBE NO (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, detergents ,. waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? X YES MAYBE NO (i ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (4) Flora. Will the proposal result in: (a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass , crops , microflora and aquatic plants)? YES MAYBE NO (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or ' endangered species of flora? x MAYBE NO (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? x YES MAYBE NO (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? X. YES MAYBE NO Explanation: -6- (d) Sewer or septic tanks? X YES MAYBE NO (e) Storm water drainage? X YES MAYBE NO (f) Solid waste and disposal? X • YES MAYBE NO Explanati1on: • (17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? - X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: • (18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open, to public view? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (19) Recreation. Will. the proposal result in an impact upon the _ quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation:' • (20) Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an alteration;' of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? X YES MAYBE NO . Explanation: • I • III. SIGNATURE I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information • is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla- ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there .be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: (signed) Dominic J. Colasurdo (name printed) • • City of Renton Planning Department • • 5-76 -5- (12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing , or create a demand• for additional housing? X ' YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? X YES MAYBE NO (b) Effects on existing parking facilities , or demand for new parking?' e X YES MAYBE NO (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? X YES' MAYBE NO (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or X movement of people and/or goods? • YES MAYBE ND (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? YES MAYBE NO (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles , bicyclists or pedestrians? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas : (a) Fire protection? YES , MAYBE NO (b) ,Police protection? X YES MAYBE NO (c) Schools? X YES MAYBE • NO (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? YES MAYBE a (e) Maintenance of public facilities , including roads? X • YES MAYBE NO (f) Other governmental services? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (15) Energy. Will the proposal result in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? • YES MAYBE NO (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? YES MAYBE NO Explanation:, (16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities : (a) Power or natural gas? X YES MAYBE NO (b) Communications systems? YES MAYBE NO • (c') Water? X YES MAYBE NO