Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
LUA80-047
\- • ?7, ,//1 ", 2,, 0 / / k? RE : SPO47-80 and SP111-86 ORDER LIFTING STOP WORK ORDER AND PERMITTING LIMITED FILL 1 . The parties hereto are engaged in litigation involving a writ of mandate , in King County Superior Court, Cause No. 87-2-03724-0. 2. Upon preliminary motions the Court has indicated that both parties are still at risk in this case and has made no final determinations , but has strongly urged settlement. 3 . King County Health Department, through Gregory A. Bishop, Coordinator of the County Solid Waste Disposal Program, has indicated that it is his belief that the environment would be better protected by finishing filling on this project , rather than having the existing fill remain open. 4 . The City of Renton does not waive its claim that SP047- 80 has lapsed or expired according to its terms and is of no further validity . American Memorial Services . does not abandon its claim that it is still entitled to further annual licenses under that special permit and is entitled to complete the fill under that special permit . 5. This order is a compromise between the parties to maintain the status quo between the parties and permit limited filling that is deemed to not be environmental threatening and to permit American Memorial to continue with its application under SP111-86 . 6 . The stop work order on SPO47-80 is lifted to permit the completion and sealing of the fill that presently exists and to permit further filling either under that permit or SP111-86 . 7 . The following work is permitted on the site: A. Material within the existing fill may be moved back from the five foot required setback and that fill may be completed and capped . B . American Memorial has agreed to install and impervious liner for the next phase of fill and that work and associated removal and export of material is authorized. - - , • Lt_ .`7 C . The material that may be used for fill shall be inert material only. D. To completely resolve the present conflict. American Memorial will continue to process SP111- 86 and will respond in writing , as soon as possible, to the draft recommendations of the Environmental Review Committee. E. With regard to any material that must be exported to obtain a flat surface for the installation of the liner, American Memorial will inform the City of Renton of the volume of the materials to be exported, the planned schedule for exportation and the receiving point or points of that material . Dated: 11)/J1A1 /// , 1987. Ro a 'son, Building and Z ning Director Appr d as to legal form: Lawrence J. War en, City Attorney r t. CITY OF RENTON Cis 'r "LL FINANCE DEPARTMENT Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk STATE OF WASHINGTON) ss. COUNTY OF KING ) I, Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk for the City of Renton, being duly sworn on oath and over the age of 21 and not a party to this matter, do hereby certify that these are true and correct copies of SP-047-80 as follows: 1. Master plan. 2. SP-047-80 Exhibit #2. 3. SP-047-80 Exhibit #3. 4. Hearing Examiner report dated 3/13/81. 5. Letter to Ted Gathe from City Clerk dated 5/11/81. 6. Hearing Examiner report dated 4/25/77. 7. Planning Department public hearing report to Hearing Examiner dated 4/12/77. 8. Planning Department preliminary report to Hearing Examiner public hearing 3/3/81. 9. Final Declaration of Non-Significance. 10.Notice Environmental Declaration. 11.Letter to Zoning Director and Planning Department from James Colt dated 9/15/80. 12.Environmental checklist form. 13.Memo to Public Works Director from Planning Director dated 5/8/80. 14.Memo to Public Works Director from Planning Director dated 4/25/80. 15.Letter to Public Works Director from Theodore Gathe dated 4/23/80. • 16.Memo to Public Works Director from Planning Director dated 3/28/80. '17.Letter to Planning Director from Theodore Gathe. • Certified this 27th day of February, 1987. Maxine E. Motor, CMC City Clerk 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2501 L AMMO US L 1'eaC�Yl i �-�' OF R� Sp- P 0417- 7C � 0 . ° THE CITY OF RENTON • MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 BARBARA' Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER O Q� FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 9�TF0 SEPT�M14 November 4, 1983 Mr. Larry Setchell Setchell & Gathe Attorneys at Law 4111 E. Madison Street Seattle, WA 98112 RE: American Memorial Services/Mt. Olivet Cemetery Corporation Special Permit No. 047-80 . . Dear Mr. Setchell: Your letter requesting a renewal of Special Permit SP-047-80:has been forwarded to this office. Your request for a renewal actually must. be, handled. as a request for a new special permit. There is no procedure for renewing the permit. The condition imposed for application six months prior to the expiration of permit SP-047-80 was to prevent the expiration while work was on-going. The processing of the new permit would then occur before the original permit expired and if the new permit were approved, there would be no gap in your client's fill operations. You are, therefore, directed to the Building & Zoning Department to initiate an application for a new special permit. If this office can be of assistance to you, please feel free to call. Sincerely, Fred J. Kaufman Land Use Hearing,Examiner C E OY FJK:se I 0342E 1111 NOV 1 I983 cc: Ron Nelson Roger Blaylock CITY CLERK City Attorney �-- City Clerk/ Mayor • OF R4,4/ a o t$ ®. z BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR O MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON, WASH.98055 o. 235-2540 Ats 0 44 SEPI�M��P BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR MEMORANDUM DATE: November 4, 1983 TO: Fred J. Kaufman, Land Use Hearing Examiner FROM: (*Roger J. Blaylock, Zoning Administrator . SUBJECT: Mt. Olivet Cemetery/Renewal of Special Permit - SP-047-80 Condition #1 of the Hearing Examiner's decision approving the special permit for filling and grading by Mt. Olivet Cemetery, dated March 13, 1981, required the applicant to apply for a renewal of the special permit at least six (6) months prior to the expiration of the special permit. Unknown to me, Ron Nelson received a letter on September 15th from Larry Setchell, attorney for Mt. Olivet Cemetery Corporation (letter attached), formally requesting a renewal. The letter was improperly directed to Mr. Nelson. Please accept my apologies for the delay. I submitted that the applicant has met the intent of the condition with the letter dated September 15, 1983. The present question is what is the appropriate procedure to utilize. We would normally assume that a public hearing would be required because the Examiner generally makes decisions after public review. Plus, there do not appear to be any provisions for extensions in the filling and grading ordinance. RJB:se att. 0423Z • • OFFICES OF®' • SETCHELL&GATHE • Larry Setchell,P.S. Theodore H.Gathe,P.S. Seth M.("Kelly")Fulcher,Jr. Drue Allen Heggie September 15, 1983 SEP 1 5 1983 Mr. Ronald Nelson Planning Department City of Renton Renton City Hall 200 Mill Ave. S. Renton, Washington 98055 Re: American Memorial Services/Mt. Olivet Cemetery Cor- poration-Special Permit NO. 047-80 Dear Mr. Nelson: Thank you for our telephone conversation this after- . noon. We represent American Memorial Services , Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary corporation, Mt. Olivet Ceme- tery Company. Please consider this the application of them for renewal of special permit SP047-80 for a term of two years or until the fill project to which the permit relates is completed. We look forward to meeting with you tomorrow to discuss not only the procedures and formalities , if any, for secur- ing this renewal, but also the matters pertaining to the Goldsmith roadway and other related issues in dispute between our clients and the Kent Highlands Corporation. Thank you for your cooperation in this respect; it is my understanding that this letter is an adequate form of application, for the renewal and extension of the refer- enced permit, and that you will advise of any formalities to follow. ' Thank you. Yours truly, LARRY SETCHELL, P.S. By1C7 /44Z1-11"e- ' Larry Setchell LS/cem cc : American Memorial Services , Inc . 4111 East Madison Street Seattle,Washington 98112 206/328-2204 • • ev Y7 8 Seattle-King County/DEPARTMENT OP PUBLIC HEALTH C ' 400 Yes-ler Way Seattle, Washington 98104 (206) 625-2161 April 30, 1982 • JESSE W.TAPP, M.D., M.P.H. Director of Public Health () fy„,,3,W J CM,C R9�'a:f ant%S ii:iit n • ()Not Admitt?'< '(` 6 Hf'p'ov aRon Nelson 4gii ' l� Renton Planning Department 19 Renton City Hall 8U/t>� 8� 11 200 Mill Avenue ,South t/C-:> Renton, WA 98055 `�N� Jp oZpT. Dear Ron: • • Re: Unlawful Solid Waste Disposal at Mt.- Olivet Cemetary On April 28, 1982 a Field Supervisor with this Department witnessed demolition waste being delivered (by truck) to Mt. Olivet Cemetary for disposal . Mt. Olivet is not presently licensed as a Solid Waste Disposal Site with the Seattle-King County Health Department. Hence, this condition is in violation of both R.C.W. 70.95 and' King County Board of Health Rules and Regulations VIII . At Mt. Olivet Cemetary's request we have forwarded to them a disposal site application. Meanwhile, Mr. Colt (Manager) of Mt. Olivet has been advised by this office to cease from the disposal of further solid waste on subject property. As you may recall , this situation previously occurred on December 17, 1981. Shortly thereafter, I sent a warning letter to Mr. Colt and forwarded copies of said letter to both you and Mr. Blayloch. In the resulting phone conversations between our two offices you disclosed that the City of Renton had issued a permit to Mt. Olivet Cemetary for the purpose of permitting demolition disposal . In order to clarify which government entity has the legal authority to regulate ' this matter I have enclosed the following documents: 1) King County Board of Health Rules and Regulation VIII 2) R.C.W. 70.95 Solid Waste Management Please note in particular the following sections of Board of Health Rules and Regulations VIII': 1) Section 2.51 Solid Waste Definition, Page 7 2) Article A6 Health Department Application Review, Page 11 3) Section 4.05A Solid Waste Disposal Site Permit, Page 22 • 4) Section 5.01 Unlawful Dumping, Page 37 5) Section 5.03 Assessment of Civil Penalty, Page 38 District Service Centers: CENTRAL NORTH COLUMBIA HEALTH CENTER SOUTHWEST EAST SOUTHEAST 1500 Public Safety Bldg. 10501 Meridian Ave.N. 3722 Hudson 10820 8th Ave.S.W. 2424 156th Ave.N.E. Renton Seattle 98104 Seattle 98133 Seattle 98118 Seattle 98146 Bellevue 98007 3001 N.E.4th St. 625-5536 363-4765 625-5151 . 244-6400 885-1278 Renton 98056 228-2620 Environmental Health Services 172 20th Ave. Auburn Seattle 98122 20 Auburn Ave. 625-2763 Auburn 98002 852-8400 Mr. Ron Nelson April 30, 1982 Page Two I trust that these documents will help resolve the confusion surrounding Mt. Olivet's solid waste problem. Should you have questions or need further information please contact me at 625-2125. Sincerely, Greg Bishop, Supervisor Solid Waste Program GB:mg Enc. cc: Roger Blayloch Renton Planning Department James Colt Mt. Olivet Cemetary Larry Kirchner Southeast Health Office OF R II � 4. �� © o BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 2 o RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR 9 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 -o Co. 09gT6O SE PI BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR MEMORANDUM DATE: November 4, 1983 TO: Fred J. Kaufman, Land Use Hearing Examiner FROM: (*Roger J. Blaylock, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: Mt. Olivet Cemetery/Renewal of Special Permit - SP-047-80 Condition #1 of the Hearing Examiner's decision approving the special permit for filling and grading by Mt. Olivet Cemetery, dated March 13, 1981, required the applicant to apply for a renewal of the special permit at least six (6) months prior to the expiration of the special permit. Unknown to me, Ron Nelson received a letter on September 15th from Larry Setchell, attorney for Mt. Olivet Cemetery Corporation (letter attached), formally requesting a renewal. The letter was improperly directed to Mr. Nelson. Please accept my apologies for the delay. I submitted that the applicant has met the intent of the condition with the letter dated September 15, 1983. The present question is what is the appropriate procedure to utilize. We would normally assume that a public hearing would be required because the Examiner generally makes decisions after public review. Plus, there do not appear to be any provisions for extensions in the filling and grading ordinance. RJB:se att. 0423Z 5 MAIDS OF R4, . � 4► 0 THE CITY OF RENTON U `$ Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 omil o BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • MAXINE E.MOTOR, 9,0 `O CITY CLERK • (206) 235-2500 0,9gTeD SEP1°' CERTIFICATE STATE OF WASHINGTON). COUNTY OF KING ) MAXINE E. MOTOR, City Clerk of the City of Renton, being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says that she is a citizen of the United States and a resident of the. State of Washington over the age of 21 and not a party of nor interested in this matter. On this 9th day of December, 1983, at 11:0.0 a.m. , I hereby certify that the attached Planning Department Preliminary Report to to Hearing Examiner date March 3, 1981 (SP 047-80) and Report and Recommendation of the Office .of The Land Use Hearing Examiner dated March 13, 1981, the appeal filed by Theodore H. Gathe, P.S. Attorney at Law, and .the Renton City Council minutes of April 2.0 , 1981, and May 11, 1981 are true and correct copies from the file No. SP 047-80 ( Mt. Olivet Cemetery Co. , Inc. ) w--- a-,_e_.,:eee )--22-0-- . Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE me this 9th day of December, 1983 . i I - Ai (1-46-•2-PA I�o .ary Pu•lic in and for the State of ashington, residing in King County BEGINNING OF FILE FILE TITLE .SPECIAL PERMIT SP- �u7 g0 Tr.) -F141 + GRADE II- ACRE sirE TU E74PARI6 cErnErARY 3 (g N.E. t 100 - BLAINE NE MT OLIV ET GEME.TERY f:QMPANY RENTON CITY COUNCIL °4.!'' Regular Meeting May 11 , 1981 Municipal Building Monday 8: 00 P .M. Council Chambers MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag and called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order. ROLL CALL OF RICHARD M. STREDICKE, Council President; RA NDALL ROCKHILL, COUNCIL ROBERT HUGHES, EARL CLYMER, THOMAS W. TRIMM, CHARLES F. SHANE AND JOHN REED. CITY OFFIdIALS BARBARA 'Y. SHINPOCH, Mayor; LAWRENCE WARREN, City Attorney; IN ATTENDANCE MICHAEL PARNESS, Administrative Assistant; DELORES A. MEAD, City Clerk; LT. DON PERSSON, Police Department; MAXINE MOTOR, Deputy City Clerk and Recorder. PRESS GREG ANDERSON, Renton Record Chronicle. MINUTE APPROVAL MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND CLYMER, APPROVE COUNCIL MINUTES OF MAY 4, 1981 AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. AUDIENCE COMMENT Ted Gathe, 411 East Madison, Seattle, representing Mt. Olivet Cemetery Co. , Inc. , requested Council adopt the Planning and Appeal Development Committee report and asked the matter be brought Special Permit before the Council . MOVED BY ROCKHILL, SECOND REED, SUSPEND 7 SP-047-80 THE ORDER OF BUSINESS AND ADVANCE TO THE PLANNING AND DEVELOP- Mt. Olivet MENT COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. planning and Development Cemetery Co. Committee Chairman Rockhill presented committee report regard- ing appeal filed re Land Use Hearing Examiner's decision of March 13, 1981 Special Permit SP 047-80' to fill and grade 11 acre site; Mt. Olivet Cemetery. The committee report found the Hearing Examiner in error as a matter of law in limiting the fill materi- als to consist only of natural materials instead of materials as provided in Section 4-2317 of the City Code and recommended, that the City Council modify the decision as follows: (1) Conclusion No. 10 be modified to strike the words "or redistribution." ' (2) Conclusion No. 5 and Condition No. 8 be modified to read: "All fill material shall consist of natural materials such as earth, rock and gravel and man-made construction debris such as asphalt, brick, cement, wood, stumps and rebar." (3) Condition No. 9 be modified to add: "The annual license required by Sec- tion 4-2308 shall not be issued until the Public Works Department shall have approved an engineering report to be provided by the applicant pursuant to Section 4-2310 in which the Public Works Department is satisfied that the applicant's operations are in ` compliance with Section 4-2317." MOVED BY ROCKHILL, SECOND CLYMER, CONCUR IN THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COM- MITTEE. Councilman Shane inquired re definition of "dump," and noted inclusion of rebar, being steel or car bodies. Council- man Stredicke inquired re location of fill and objected to extra truck traffic and water spraying without observation point, citing traffic problems. James Cole, Mt. Olivet Cemetery, ex- plained the cemetery's water rights for hundreds of years, being natural spring and subject of appeal recently before Council rye Rainier Sand and Gravel special permit. Following further discus- sion, the MOTION CARRIED. . Wetlands Leonard Steiner, 13239 NE 100th Kirkland, President East Lake Preservation Washington Audubon Society, requested his letter be read at this time. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECOND REED, CORRESPONDENCE BE READ. CARRIED. Letter from Mr. Steiner reported submittal of proposal for preservation of wetlands as part of the valley drainage plan for the Black River Forest, marshes east and west of Lind Ave. south of the Boeing Co. Valley Office Park and the expanded marsh owned by the City (noting need for additional property to be added to the 20 acres). The letter explained current problem that the property south of the Boeing Company V.O.P. and west of Lind Ave. has been granted a fill permit, explained the wetlands value and Renton City Council 5/11/81 Page 2 •• Audience Comment - Continued Wetlands asked that a decision be reached and action taken to preserve the Preservation wetlands. The letter suggested cost be shared on a county- wide program /as part of their wetland study or valley drainage plan, noting possible local bond issue of $10-$20 per household over five years to buy development rights and share cost for not developing. The letter asked positive action fearing areas will be destroyed by fall of 1981 . MOVED BY REED, SECOND BY CLYMER, REFER REQUEST TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. Community Mary Ryan, Lake Desire Dr.. S. objected to proposed community Facilities facilities charges of $350 per bedroom and objected on behalf Charges of larger developers, such as Michael Mastro, builder of 1500 units per year in the City. CONSENT AGENDA The following items are adopted by one motion, which follows the busines matters included: Latecomer Letter from Public Works Department submitted request for a Request water line latecomer agreement and a sewer line latecomer agree- Lidzbarski ment for Edward K. Lidzbarski and Ann Lidzbarski , Hillmans's Earlington Gardens by their Agent Don E. Fitts, Fitts Escrow Co. , 301 SW Grady Way. Cost of water line project W-618 is $10,904.85. Cost of sewer line project S-286 is $10,453.30. Refer to Utilities Committee. Latecomer Letter from Public Works Department submitted request for Agreement latecomer agreement for sewer line for NE 20th St. (S-305) ; Sanitary Sewer Joepete McCaslin. Project cost is $23,892.23. Refer to the McCaslin Utilities Committee. Latecomer Letter from the Public Works Department submitted request for Request - Water water latecomer agreement (Developer's Extension Agreement) Cunningham located at Valley Industrial Building, 4060 Lind Ave. SW, by Brad M. Cunningham. Refer to Utilities Committee. Proclamation Proclamation of Mayor Shinpoch declared 5/18/81 as KIRO Radio LIRO Leukemia Leukemia Cure-A-Thon Day in Renton and urged citizens to Cure-A-Thon join fight against Leukemia by pleding dollars for research. Council concur. Unemployment Letter from the Finance Department requested transfer of Compensation $14,000 from Cumulative Reserve Fund unto Unemployment Compensa- Fund Transfer tion Fund to cover quarterly payments. Refer to Ways and Means Committee for resolution. (See Resolutions) Appointment Letter from Mayor Shinpoch reappointed Nancy Mathews, 4125 NE 17th Park Board St. , and Ronald J. Regis, 824 Jefferson Ave. NE, to, the Park Board for four-year terms effective to 6/1/85. Other Board Mem- bers: Joan Moffatt, Tom Teesdale and Nathaniel Weathers, Jr. Fund Transfer Letter from the Fire Department requested resolution to transfer Fire Department in the amount of $2,559 from the Contingency Fund to Fire Sup- pression Division to remedy drainage problem at Fire Station #13. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. (See Resolutions) City Hall Letter from the Executive, Parks and Finance Departments requested Annex resolution be drafted for transfer of S300,000 for cost of property, Park Division building, rennovation and maintenance of City Hall Annex (Park Division) ; transfer from Municipal Facilities to Park Annex Dvn. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Damages Claim Claim for Damages was filed by Mary B. Brown, 500 Burnett South, for water damage to basement, alleging clogged storm drains; Claim in amount of $150 to $180. Refer to City Attorney and Insurance Carrier. Consent Agenda MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND CLYMER, APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA Approval AS WRITTEN. CARRIED. !!:) f ` Renton City Council 4/20/81 Page 2 Consent Agenda - Continued Appointment Letter from Mayor Shinpoch reappointing Human Rights and Human Rights Affairs Commission Members for two year terms to be effective and Affairs through'' April 23, 1983-Marilyn Bingaman, Barbara Lansing, and Albert Talley. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Transfer of Funds Letter from Ted. Bennett, Acting Finance Director, requested Coulon Beach transfer of funds from Coulon Beach Construction Fund to GO Bonds Construction Fund Redemption Fund in the amount of $466,000.00, for interest payment pending receipt of property taxes. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Comdemnation Letter from Richard Houghton, Acting Public Works Director, SW 43rd St. requested ordinance to condemn properties on SW 43rd Street Improvement project. Joint Project Kent/Renton, East to West Valley Highway. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. (See Ord. #3533) Travel Request Letter from Fire Chief Geissler and Police Chief Darby requested authorization for Detective Kittelson (Police Dept.) and Ken Walls (Fire Dept.) to attend the Northwest Fire & Arson Seminar to be held at Portland, Oregon, May 4-8, 1.981 . Request for $400.00 advance travel . Council Concur. ' Bid Opening- City Clerk presented bid opening 4/14/81 for Gene Coulon Beach Gene Coulon Beach Park, Contract #2, ten bids received. Refer to Park Board. Park,Contract #2- Renton Park Board recommended award of contract to the low bidder Bid Award Frank Coluccio Construction in the total amount of $3,101 ,922. • Mayor and City Clerk authorized to sign. Council concur. Claims for Claims for Damages were filed by Washington Natural Gas Co. for Damages-Washington 1) alleged scraped 20" main at 725 S. 19th St.-cost of repairs Natural Gas Co. $44.66; 2) alleged broken 2" main at 2700 NE 23rd St.-cost of repairs $49.86; 3) alleged gouged 4" main at 4625 Duval Ave. NE- cost of repairs $109.91 . Refer to City Attorney and Insurance Carrier. Claim for Damages- Claim for Damages filed by James A. Hamrick •for alleged vehicle James Hamrick damage when he ran off the end of roadway northbound on Valley Parkway SW. Claim in the amount of $1 ,466.53. Refer to City Attorney and Insurance Carrier. LID 325 Letter from Del Mead, City Clerk, presented petition for South of SW 43rd, roadway construction LID in area south of SW 43rd St. and and East of SR; east of SR 167, filed by D. Connell . Petition certified as 167 100%. . Refer to Public Works Department for preparation of preliminary assessment roll . LID 325. tiom Appeal Mt. Olivet''. An appeal has been filled by Theodore Gath, Attorney for Mt. i Cemetery, Inc. ; :Olivet• Cemetery, Inc.j' regarding Land Use Hearing Examiner's SP-047-80 recommendation for approval with conditions of Special Permit SP-047-80 to expand cemetery. Refer to Planning and 1 Development 'Committee. Consent Agenda MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND ROCKHILL, TO APPROVE THE CONSENT Approval AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE AND CURRENT BUSINESS Annexation • Letter was read from Renton Chamber of Commerce requesting Guidelines Council review its existing annexation. guidelines and adopt a positive annexation policy for the City per the "Sphere of Influence" already adopted. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND HUGHES, TO REFER MATTER TO PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE. CARRIED. MOVED BY ROCKHILL, SECOND SHANE, COUNCIL GO ON RECORD FAVORING A PHILOSOPHY OF CONTROLLED GROWTH WITH REGARD TO FURTHER ANNEXATIONS. CARRRIED. . LAW OFFICES OF SETCHELL &GATHE Larry Setchell,P.S. Theodore H.Gathe,P.S. /g"1��72), Seth M.("Kelly")Fulcher,Jr. o �jr, April 8 , 1981 , �,�gg"0 `�� Ms. Delores A. Mead 'OP City Clerk o'� � ce, City of Renton 6' \���gOF ) 200 Mill Avenue South ' �z9z�z�z`�titi Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Appeal Filed :by Mt. Olivet Cemetery Appeal of Land Use Examiner' s Decision dated March 13, 1981, Special Permit; SP047-80 Dear Ms. Mead: Pursuant to Title 4, Chapter 30 , Renton City Code, applicant Mt. Olivet Cemetery Company, Inc. hereby appeals the March 13 , 1981 decision of the Land Use Hearing Examiner for the City of Renton, to the City Council and encloses the proper filing fee in the amount of $25.00 . Included for the Council' s consideration of this appeal are the following: 1 . Mt. Olivet Cemetery Company, Inc. incorporates by reference each and every item contained in its request for reconsideration dated1March 25, 1981. 2 . Mt. Olivet Cemetery Company, Inc. wishes to point out that contrary to the Hearing Examiner' s finding that the subject proposal was processed as a fill and grade operation and not as a solid waste fill site, the Planning Department ' s Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner with regard to this application cited as an applicable section of the Zoning Code, Chapter 23, Mining Excavation and Grading Ordinance. Chapter 23 includes the requirements with regard to solid waste fills. Second, as pointed out in the attached Request for Reconsideration, the Planning Department ' s Report consistently referred to the previous materials that were used as fill at the site under the 1977 permit and reiterated: the restriction used in the previous permit conditions prohibiting sanitary land fill or fill material consisting or plastics, car bodies, refrigerators, and stoves. . The applicant believes and the record bears out that this application; was in fact processed under the solid waste fill provisions. Had the applicant been aware that this was in fact an issue at the hearing, or had the appli- cant been aware that the Hearing Examiner intended to modify or vary the recommendation by the Planning Department, the applicant would have produced further testimony with regard to the economic unviability of the fill and grade operation 4111 East Madison Street Seattle,Washington 98112 206/328-2204 Ms. Delores Mead April 8 , 1981 Page Two on the subject property using only natural materials. Instead, the applicant agreed to all the terms and con- ditions contained in the Planning Department' s recommen- dation believing that the same would be adopted by the Examiner. 3. Mt. Olivet Cemetery, Inc. is prepared to reapply for special permit specifically under the solid waste fill ordinance provisions. However, it is believed that this is a repetitious and wasteful exercise for both the applicant and the City. The Planning Department and the City have been well aware of the materials used as fill on the Mt. Olivet site and specifically approve the use of said materials under the 1977 permit. Mt. Olivet is agreeable to any condition restricting the utilization of materials nor- mally permitted in the solid waste dumping site with the exception of construction debris which has been used to fill the site in the past. Without the use of such debris, Mt. Olivet cannot afford the cost of completing the project with only natural fill. The applicant respectfully requests that the City Council revise the Hearing Examiner' s report and recommendation and those specific conclusions and conditions as specifically set forth in the attached request for reconsideration. Respectfully submitted, THEODORE H. GATHE, P. S. Wiale/44' By Theodore H. Gat THG/dag Enclosure •.yew 1 • 7n 1112131 Aks 2 ., S 4 ' ``9etz sz�2�ti 5 6 OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON 7 In re Application of ) 8 ) File No. SP-047-80 MT. OLIVET CEMETERY CO. , INC. ) 9 for a special permit ) REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION 10 ) 11 Comes now Mt. Olivet Cemetery Company, Inc. by and through its 12 attorney Theodore H. Gathe and requests the hearing examiner for 13 the City of Renton to reconsider and modify the following items. 14 1. Applicant requests that the hearing examiner reconsider 15 Conclus,ion No. 5 of the Hearing Examiner's Report and Recommen- 16 dation which states as follows: 17 5. The site is not to be utilized as a solid waste dump, and, therefore, only naturally 18 occurring materials such as earth, rock and gravel may be used to fill the site. 19 2 . Applicant requests that the hearing examiner reconsider 20 and modify Condition No. 8 in the Hearing Examiner's Report and 21 Recommendation which reads as follows: 22 8. All fill materials shall consist of 23 natural materials such as earth, rock and gravel. 24 3 . The applicant requests that the Hearing Examiner recon- 25 sider Conclusion 10 which reads as follows: 26 Conclusion 10: The permit is issued solely 27 for the purpose of bringing fill to the site from outside sources and no non-site removal or 28 redistribution of material is permitted under this permit. 29 ARGUMENT: 30 As .,the hearing examiner pointed out in Finding No. 6 in the 31 32 Request for Reconsideration —1 THEODORE H.GATHE,P.S. Attorney at Law 4111 East Madison Street Seattle,Washington 98112 206/328-2204 ! , 1 •eport and Recommendation, a special permit to fill and grade the 2 -ubject property was issued in 1977 and subsequently expired in 3 1980. The .city permitted an interim filling use on the property in 4 iew of the ongoing operation and the fact that the fill and grade 5 •lan had not yet been completed. 6 In a preliminary report to the Hearing Examiner dated April 12, 7 977 (a copy of which is attached hereto) the applicant, Mt. Olivet 8 emetery Co. , Inc. requested a special permit for a fill and grade. 9 •peration in order to rehabilitate an abandoned surface mining area 10 and to include that reclaimed area as part of the Mt. Olivet it emetery grounds. Page 1 of the Preliminary Report to Hearing 12Ixaminer by the Planning Department indicated that the proposed 13 fill shall consist of solid waste, including broken concrete, 14 bricks, wood. and other construction rubble. On Page 3 of the 15 Planning Department's Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner, 16 Department Analysis No. 3 provided as follows: 17 3 . Fill material will consist of construc- tion rubble layered from fill material from the 18 construction site. Each lift or layer of con- struction material fill will be covered with 19 suitable fill material from the site at the completion of each work day . . . . 20 On Page 5 of said Preliminary Report, the Planning Department 21 recommended to the Hearing Examiner approval of the special permit 22 for fill and grade subject to certain conditions. Among those con- 23 - ditions was' the following: 24 6. Sanitary land fill or fill material con- 25 sisting of car bodies, refrigerators, stoves, or other similar bulk items shall not be permitted 26 on the subject site. 27 After a land use hearing on April 12, 1977 the land use Hearing 28 Examiner for the City of Renton recommended approval of the appli- 29 cation on April 22, 1977. Included among his Findings of Fact, 30 Conclusions and Conditions were the following: 31. 32 Request for Reconsideration -2 THEODORE H.GATHE,P.S. • Attorney at Law 4111 East Madison Street Seattle,Washington 98112 206/328-2204 1 Finding No. 2: The area adjacent to the subject property has been heavily excavated 2 throughout the years leaving large cavities as remnants of those former operations. The appli- 3 cant is proposing to reclaim one of those existing cavities by filling, using a variety of fill 4 materials approved and specified by the City's Mining and Grading Ordinance. (emphasis added) 5 Finding No. 7: The specific types of material 6 that are prohibited are specified in the City's Mining and Grading Ordinance. • 7 The recommendation of the Hearing Examiner was approval subject 8 to the Planning Department's Recommendation Nos. 1 through 14. 9 Included among those 14 conditions proposed by the Planning 10 Department was Condition No. 6 cited herein: 11 6 . Sanitary land fill or fill material 12 consisting of car bodies, refrigerators, stoves, or other similar bulk items shall not be per- 13 mitted on the subject site. 14 Based on the Recommendation and Report of the Hearing Examiner, 15 Mt. Olivet proceeded to begin its fill and grade operation. In 16 accordance with the earlier recommendation of the Hearing Examiner, 17 Mt. Olivet accepted only construction debris and other items per- 18 mitted under solid waste fills. At no time has Mt. Olivet allowed 19 the dumping of any items permitted under the sanitary land fill 20 provisions or any fill material consisting of plastics, car bodies, 21 refrigerators, stoves, or other similar bulk items not permitted on 22 the subject site. 23 On March 3 , 1981 the Planning Department presented a 24 Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner with regard to the above 25 mentioned application. Item 10 of the Planning Department's analy- 26 sis provided as follows: 27 10. Based upon the description of work 28 methods and rehabilitation A-1 submitted by the applicant, the Planning Department has no concerns 29 except over the type of material used for fill. The site should not become a sanitary land fill or 30 consist of materials such as car bodies, regriger- ators, stoves or other bulk items and plastics. 31 32 Request for Reconsideration -3 THEODORE H.GATHE,P.S. Attorney at Law 4111 East Madison Street Seattle,Washington 98112 r- 1 Plastics are a non-degradable material and "will remain on the site forever causing unusual ground 2 water patterns. 3 The Planning Department recommended approval of the subject 4 site stating as follows: 5 The Planning Department recommendation is almost identical with the recommdation submitted 6 to the Hearing Examiner on April 12, 1977 for the original request. It is recommended by the Depart- ? ment that the Hearing Examiner approve the special permit for fill and grade file no. SP-047-80 sub- 8 ject to the following conditions: 9 Among those conditions was the following: 10 Condition 6: Sanitary land fill or fill material consisting of plastics, car bodies, 11 refrigerators, stoves or other similar bulk items shall not be permitted on the subject 12 site. 13 As set forth above, the Hearing Examiner in the present appli- 14 cation recommended that the site not be utilized as a solid waste 15 dump and permitted only natural occurring materials such as earth, 16 rock and gravel to be used to fill the site. The applicant has 17 never had any intent to turn the subject site into a sanitary land 18 fill. Its only intent is to reclaim the property in the most effe- 19 cient and timely process. Without the ability to fill the subject 20 area with construction debris which has been the practice in the 21 past under the previous application, and which is a practice which 22 has continued up to the present date, Mt. Olivet does not have the 23 financial resources to complete the fill and grade operation using 24 only earth, rock and gravel. Nor does Mt. Olivet believe that such 25 a filling operation could be completed within the time period 26 allowed under this permit. 27 The applicant is agreeable to any condition restricting the 28 utilization of any materials normally permitted in a solid waste 29 dumping site with the exception of construction debris which has 30 been used to fill the site in the past. 31 32 Request for Reconsideration -4 THEODORE H.GATHE,P.S. Attorney at Law 4111 East Madison Street Seattle,Washington 98112 2n6/12R 22n4 !/// " ,4 1 The applicant did not address itself to the question of the 2 fill material since it concurred with the staff 's preliminary. 3 report to the Hearing Examiner including Item 10 on Page 5 referred 4 to herein. The applicant requests that the Hearing Examiner modify 5 Conclusion No. 5 to correspond with the Planning Department's 6 Preliminary Report as set forth in Item 10, Page 5 as follows: 7 The site should not become a sanitary land fill or consist of materials such as car bodies, 8 refrigerators, stoves or other bulk items and plastics. 9 As an alternative to that recommendation, the applicant suggests 10 that the Hearing Examiner permit fill' material consisting of 11 construction rubble layered with fill material from the subject 12 site as recommended in the previous application. 13 As described above, under the original application application 14 for the fill and grade operation of the subject site, the applicant 15 16 was using fill material consisting of construction rubble layered with fill material from the subject site. Item 0 of the original 17 18 Preliminary Report of the Hearing Examiner dated April 12, 1977 19 provided as follows: 20 Each lift or- layer of construction material fill will be covered with suitable fill material 21 from the site at the completion of each work day. (emphasis added) 22 A literal reading of Conclusion 10 of the Hearing Examiner's 23 decision would restrict redistribution of material necessary to 24 cover each layer of construction material fill. Since the granting 25 of the original permit, Mt. Olivet has back filled the construction 26 material with fill material from its own site. To now require it 27 to obtain fill material from an outside source would be prohibiti- 28 vely expensive. 29 SUMMARY: 30 With the exceptions noted herein, the applicant is in full 31 32 Request for Reconsideration -5 THEODORE H.GATHE,P.S. Attorney at Law 4111 East Madison Street Seattle,Washington 98112 206/328-2204 1 agreement with the decision of the Hearing Examiner with regard to 2 this application. If the applicant is permitted to complete the 3 fill and grade operation on the site using the material that has 4 been used heretofore and back filling that material from the sub- 5 ject site, the Mt. Olivet property can be quickly and efficiently 6 reclaimed and turned into additional cemetery and green space pro- 7 perty. The applicant requests that the Hearing Examiner reconsider 8 the items mentioned herein and make additional findings, conclu- 9 sions and conditions as are appropriate. 10 Respectfully submitted March a.S , 1981. 11 THEODORE H. GATHE, P.S. 12 l 13 B !o ' 'te4 O�-.y Theodore H. Gathe 14 Attorney for Mt. Olivet Cemetery 15 16 • 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Request for Reconsideration -6 THEODORE H.GATHE,P.S. Attorney at Law 4111 East Madison Street Seattle,Washington 98112 206/328-2204 Wiley Davy News C.ty casts eyes up at Mount Olivet 3y TINA HILDING /alley Daily News RENTON - Renton officials say they are concerned about a new mountain - the Mount Olivet Land- fill - that has appeared in the city, and they will meet with the owners today to discuss it. "I'm no engineer, but my com- mon sense is that it's towering like Mount Calvary over our city," said Zanetta Fontes, assistant city attor- ney. "That's got to be past any rea- sonable final elevation." Mayor Earl Clymer said, "I don't care what they do, our mountain can't get any higher,"joking that it might be high enough for snow. "I think it's full." Mount Olivet caught City Hall's attention in January, when the 70- acre Newcastle Landfill north of town closed, making the 10-acre Mount Olivet site King County's only legal dump for construction debris. In August, Mount Olivet closed temporarily, creating concern for construction debris haulers. Mount Olivet's managers, Fiorillo North- west Inc., said the 60-day closure was necessary to complete construc- tion of environmental controls. The landfill lies over the aquifer that supplies Renton's drinking water. Following the temporary closure, the King County Council passed an ordinance allowing wood waste to be dumped at county transfer sta- tions, relieving concerns for small haulers. The County Council will meet Sept. 17 to reconsider opening the Newcastle Landfill. Renton, meanwhile, is concerned enough about the mound of trash to call today's meeting with the owners of the property, American Memori- al Services Inc. Fontes said the city is in the pro- cess of renewing the landfill's oper- ating permit, which expired earlier this year. The city has concerns about the mound's final elevation. "We need to be satisfied they are still in compliance," Fontes said. "That's why we're getting together. Before we renew this, we want to be sure that the conditions have been met." Fontes said that the city has not been shown an acceptable plan that outlines the final height. She wouldn't say whether the city was considering shutting down the landfill, but said Renton has done its part in taking waste from all over King County. See OLIVET,A5 ews Thursday, September 13, 1990■A5 DUMP: Good news is it won't get higher, official says Continued from page Al compliance with its permits. "We believe that there's not a problem about them being in com- pliance," said Fontes. "It's just a matter of them getting documenta- tion to us." Fontes says the company owns about two acres to the west of the 10-acre landfill, but the city and American Memorial Services dis- agree about whether those lands can become part of the cemetery. But whether the cemetery expands its acreage,at least one city official was relieved it won't grow taller. "The good news is it's not going to get any higher," said Jay Covington, Mayor Earl Clymer's assistant, said of the final elevation. "The discussions are continuing, and I think that's the important thing." The city will meet again with the property owners and landfill opera- tors in the near future, says Fontes. According to Colt, the reclaimed landfill will have a maximum eleva- tion 16 feet higher than the top of the eastern boundary of the adjacent cemetery. Colt is general manager for the cemetery, which has grave- stones dating from 1875. OLIVET: Waste site turns;Into mountain of trash Continued from page Al "I don't know that Renton has to be the receptacle for all of this debris," she said. "Maybe some other communities need to think about doing their part.It's a regional problem. "I feel for the haulers, but frank- ly, I feel more for the citizens of this community," she said. Jay Covington, Clymer's execu- tive assistant, said the city will sit down with the landfill's owners to determine what the situation is and how to sort it out. The landfill has grown beyond anyone's expectations, Covington said. The city thought the company was going to fill a gravel pit to ground level, to provide expansion room for the Mount Olivet ceme- tery. "Nobody envisioned they would build a mountain," he said. "There is some real concern about how much more that landfill can take." Larry Ransom, attorney for the American Memorial Services, said, "Our expectation is the meeting is to discuss a number of issues related to the operation of the landfill." vvoi aumvviii aump Become .... , . . , ____ . _ i ' . . a ; .., ww. 4, 1 t0 'h ' x {` ML ♦ f, f / t y, t :r... Valley Datly News photo by GARY KISSE Mount OIIVP.t landfill looms over nroveslteS in Mount Olivet Cemetery. u, y, Ju, ay 4....U....,,.,.....,.... ,..1 t rcent loon clearing Sat- 1305 17th Street S.E.,Auburn. ;�.�. and Monday with \ ;'' la rs.Highs,mid-60s Funds raised will help pay remaining �a�,. o lower 50s. Sunny Saturday. medical bills for the late Betty Federal 0 Monday with a ewers.Highs,mid- Way• '0Aubui;' mid-50a. Fort Dent festival 4 0 a.m. -0.6 ft. TUKWILA — King County's third 0 El p.m. 7.4 ft. annual Fort Dent Festival is offered p.m. 10.6 ft. from 11 a.m. to 5 p.m. Saturday and Sunday at Fort Dent Park in ®� Tukwila. Free admission includes a.m. -0.4 ft. non-stop musical entertainment, 1114 1‘,..,Q a.m. 9.5 ft. including 6.6 ft. an appearance by the Laki p.m. 11.6 tt. U.S. Navy Band, and over 40 art- Puyallup l�� Tap und ists, crafts people and food ven- dors. Commuter Watch is Valley pilot c There will be a special section for Daily News'effort to help South delays King County commuters avoid Finish: 7:26 p.m. the kids, where they can get their delays caused by major road- s:as a.m. faces painted, watch a puppet construction projects. immimi show or complete an art project. 1 • Auburn: Highway 18, er clost 68 cdy Michaelangelo, one of the Teenage Green River Bridge to tive ro 83 clr Mutant Turtles, will also make S.E.312th Way;repaving 7 p.m. Oravet 64 .06 rn Ninjato 5:30 a.m. Monday-Friday; Bridge 61 .01 cdy a special appearance from noon to road reduced to one lane for County 61 c 64 cdy 3 p.m. Saturday. Call for informs both directions, flaggers and to SR 1 60 clr tion, 296-4232. 20 clr 61 cdy 58 clr 75 cdy 64 clr 71 cdy 66 cdy clr ` 56 cdy Now C 75 .02 cdy 55 cdy 58 cdy 73 .01 cdy 52 clr 58 rn PRESERVA 75 02. cdy 60 cdy 76 cdy 70 01 cdy 70 cdy 63 cdy 67 cdy les for Wednes- firings,Calif.Low es REMODEus days high Hi Lo Wthr 66 52 88 75 cdy 79 66 cdy Hurry! Sale ends 61 40 clr 80 M clr 82 64 clr 81 72 clr ,f^"" 64 46 clrSave $9.09 per gallon! 84 M 78rcdy sat! .� • M 42 M * '`1`x :s$4::i i . ; Latex Flat Finish 68 48 cdy , '�'-'r : 63 52 cdy �..;,,. ,, > 67 Series. Interior. Easy to apply. 64 rn 90 70 clr S " - Mfg. suggested list$19.08/gal. 79 70 cdy wnF 63 55 clr 1=fF 'F 66 39 clr :a sr.a ucwM* _ Sale price 63 43 cdy uses.'...�. `",,,,, rtxw�w. per gallon: 68 50 cdy `'' .'-'-' ro-k' r y.�u, 82 77cdy �,_... Save $9.74 per gallon! y75 64 cdy 637 4a cdy Save $8.45 per gallon! Eggshell Latex Enamel 82 63 cdy 68 Series. Interior. Tough and 70 55 cdy , Exterior Oil-Based scrubbable! Mfg. suggested list isociated Press A11___i r.•1_A_ r]S__1_1_ ton-r-)i....i green e . A\t5 By TINA HILDING Valley Daily News RENTON - Although Renton residents may see nothing but a big pile of dirt when they look up at Mount Olivet Landfill, the landfill's owners envision a beautiful open space with trees and green grass. "It's going to be like a park," says Jim Colt, presi- dent of American Memorial Services,the company that owns the landfill property. Under a plan that Colt calls "a way of reclaiming a mined-out gravel pit," the barren, 10-acre site on Northeast 3rd Street will first become a greenbelt, then eventually be a part of the Mount Olivet cemetery. Before graves are dug, the landfill will be covered with between 15 and 18 feet of dirt, he says, and the area will be regraded to follow the natural contours of the century-old cemetery. Using a landfill site for cemeteries or other uses is common industry practice, he says. "Essentially,a cemetery is a greenbelt. It's a sanctu- ary with green grass and tall trees. Cemeteries are here for the living," he said. "We intend to turn what we're doing into a greenbelt, which will be welcomed by the community." At least one Renton City Council member says he's skeptical, though. Dick Stredicke says he'll believe it when he sees it. "It looks awful tall to me. I think it's ridiculous,"he said. "I don't see any use for that property at all." Stredicke said the property could be useful only if part of it is bulldozed and leveled off. "If they have a plan for how it's going to be redevel- oped, that's what planners are there for. Maybe they can surprise me,"he says. "I see it as a knob on the hill that's going to be there for a while." City officials met with the property owners earlier this week to discuss what the landfill will look like when it is filled. The city also has met with the opera- tors of the landfill, Fiorillo Northwest. Zanetta Fontes, assistant city attorney, says the land- fill's operators told the city the mound of dirt and debris should not be getting any taller.A portion of the landfill has been capped, she says. The city has given the landfill operators until Nov. 3 • to produce a closure plan, she says. The plan doesn't mean closure is imminent, says Fontes, but sets the stage for how the reclamation project will look when it's completed. For instance, the plan may outline final elevations and slopes of the landfill as well as erosion-control measures, she says. The city earlier expressed concerns about the height of the landfill and questioned whether the landfill is in o..,.nI lairs A cl WASHINGTON morning low with some uds and and Monday, , , urday. Mostly cloudy Sui Todadrizzle and a chance of sl y to lower 70s.Lows,mid- Seattle, Tacoma, Everett and vicinity— Eastern Washingtor Low clouds today, becoming partly sunny and Partly cloudy Sunday warmer by afternoon. Highs in the low to mid- chance showers or thund 70s with winds north 5 to 15 mph by afternoon. 70s to low 80s.Lows,m Partly cloudy at night and lows in the lower 50s. Partly sunny Friday.Highs in the mid-70s. Today's tides Coastal— Low clouds and fog today with afternoon clearing. Highs in the upper 60s to 1st low lower 70s with winds north 5 to 10 mph.Partly 1st high cloudy at night and lows in the upper 40s to 2nd low • lower 50s.Partly sunny Friday.Highs in the low 2nd high to mid-70s. • Olympics and Washington Cascades —Cloudy with areas of fog along the lower west Friday's tides slopes today, but otherwise mostly sunny. Freezing level near 12,000 feet with pass tem- 1st low peratures in the mid-60s. Winds east 5 to 15 1st high 1 mph.Partly cloudy at night and Friday.Freezing 2nd low level near 12,500 feet and pass temperatures in 2nd high the mid-to upper 60s. East slopes of the Cascades—Fair today Tides are for South Pug and Friday with highs in the low to mid-80s and lows in the 40s.Winds today northwest 5 to 15 Sian times mph. Extended Sunset today Sunrise Friday Western Washington — Late night and Philadelphia U.S. temperatures Phoenix Temperatures indicate previous day's high Pittsburgh and overnight low to 5 p.m. PDT. Portland,Maine Portland,Ore. HI Lo Prc Otlk Providence Albany,N.Y. 82 56 cdy Rapid City Albuquerque 89 62 cdy Reno Amarillo 86 54 clr Richmond Anchorage 61 48 .35 rn Sacramento Asheville 83 66 .48 rn St Louis Atlanta 88 71 .43 cdy Salt Lake City Atlantic City 82 57 cdy San Antonio Austin 89 71 cdy San Diego Baltimore 86 67 cdy San Francisco Billings 93 63 clr San Juan,P.R. Birmingham 94 70 .28 cdy Santa Fe Bismarck 92 54 clr Seattle Boise 88 59 elr Shreveport Boston 77 63 cdy Spokane Brownsville 90 73 .86 cdy Syracuse Buffalo 79 59 rn Tampa-St Ptrsbg Burlington,Vt. 82 54 cdy Topeka Casper 94 44 clr Tucson Charleston,S.C. 85 77 cdy Tulsa Charlotte,N.C. 87 70 .23 cdy Washington,D.C. Chicago 85 64 cdy Wichita Cincinnati 75 67 .47 cdy Wilmington,Del. Cleveland 81 60 cdy Columbia,S.C. 93 71 cdy National temperature Columbus,Ohio 77 66 1.53 cdy day:High—1 t4 at Born Concord,N.H. 74 60 .01 cdy —27 at Gunnison,Colo Dallas-Ft Worth 88 70 .02 cdy Denver 92 51 clr World tempera Des Moines 88 64 clrD Temperatures indicai El Pasoa 83 59 rn 93 63 cdyy and overnight low to 5 p El Evansville 79 71 .06 rn Amsterdam Fairbanks 60 41 rn As Amsterdam Flagstaff 88 52 clr Auckland ns Grand Rapids 85 56 rn Bangkok • Greensboro,N.C. 87 66 .01 cdy Hartford 81 68 cdy Barbados Helena 91 49 clr Beijing Honolulu 88 73 .01 clr Beirut Houston 80 72 rn Belgrade Indianapolis 80 66 rn Berlin Jackson,Miss. 87 72 .05 cdy Bermuda Juneau 54 48 rn Bogota Kansas City 88 65 cdy Brussels Las Vegas 106 73 clr Budapest Little Rock 80 69 .21 cdy B'Aires Los Angeles 94 70 clr Cairo Louisville 75 70 .34 rn Calgary Lubbock 89 58 cdy Copenhagen Memphis 87 69 1.75 cdy Dublin Miami Beach 86 78 .22 cdy Frankfurt Milwaukee 85 67 clr Geneva Mpls-St Paul 90 69 cdy Havana Nashville 78 70 .79 cdy Hong Kong New Orleans 78 73 2.50 rn Istanbul New York City 82 70 cdy Jerusalem Norfolk,Va. 83 65 cdy Kiev Oklahoma City 85 70 cdy Lisbon Omaha 92 66 clr London March 13, 1981 OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION. APPLICANT: Mt. Olivet Cemetery Co. , Inc. FILE NO. SP-047-80 LOCATION: Property located north and east of the existing platted cemetery, east of N.E. 3rd Street, in the vicinity of 100 Blaine Avenue N.E. and the powerline right-of-way. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant seeks special permit approval for fill and grade of an +11 acre site. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Planning Department Recommendation: Approval with conditions. Hearing Examiner Decision: Approval with conditions. PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department preliminary report was received by the REPORT: Examiner on February 25, 1981 . PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing onthe subject as follows: The hearing was opened on March 3, 1981 at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the • Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and the applicant had received and reviewed the Planning Department preliminary report. Roger Blaylock, Associate Planner, presented the report, and entered the following exhibits into the record: Exhibit #1 : Application File containing Planning Department report and other pertinent documents Exhibit #2: Site Plan with Finished Elevations Exhibit #3: Vicinity Map The Examiner inquired regarding the proposed quantity of fill material and the number of potential truck trips generated by the project. Mr. Blaylock indicated that the subject had not been addressed. • The Examiner requested testimony by the applicant. Responding was: Ted Gathe Attorney at Law 4111 E. Madison Seattle, WA 98112 Mr. Gathe advised that the Planning Department recommendations had been reviewed by the applicant and although there are no objections to the conditions, clarification is required on certain items by the applicant. Responding was: James Colt P.O. Box 547 Renton, WA 98057 Mr. Colt, the applicant, requested clarification of Condition No. 4 of the report which pertains to submission of interim drainage plans. He advised that drainage plans were included with plans for road construction filed previously on numerous occasions. He also indicated that Stoneway Concrete Co. had constructed the roadway and had agreed to correct any drainage problems which currently exist. Referencing Condition No. 11 , hours of operation, Mr. Colt indicated concurrence with the recommended hours as stated in the report. Regarding Condition No. 10, which recommends that the 60-foot easement granted to ERADCO by Mt. Olivet be dedicated to the City of Renton for public street purposes, Mr. Colt stated agreement to the dedication only upon completion of the roadway, noting that upon completion, the existing access on the western portion of the cemetery to -047-80 Page Two Maine Avenue N.E. would be closed. He requested that as a consideration of the dedication, the city vacate that strip of roadway from Blaine across the cemetery property. Responding to Mr. Blaylock's inquiry regarding the proposed quantity of fill material , Mr. Colt advised that in the original application 25,000 cubic yards of fill had been anticipated; however, due to the phasing procedure, the remaining figure is unknown. The Examiner requested testimony in support or opposition to the application. There was no response. He then invited final comments from the Planning Department staff. Mr. Blaylock indicated the opinion of the department that dedication of the roadway would be necessary only if the ERADCO property is allowed to develop. Responding to Mr. Blaylock's comments regarding the Planning Department recommendation for vacation of Blaine Avenue N.E. , the Examiner advised that authority for approval of street vacations rests with the City Council . The Examiner requested further comments. Since none were offered, the hearing regarding File No. SP-047-80 was closed by the Examiner at 9:30 a.m. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1 . The request is for approval of a special permit to fill and grade an approximately +11 acre site. 2. The application file containing the application, SEPA documentation, the Planning Department report, and other pertinent documents was entered into the record as Exhibit #1 . 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , R.C.W. 43.21 .C. , as amended, a Declaration of Non-Significance conditioned on hours of operation has been issued for the subject proposal by the Environmental Review Committee, responsible official . 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the impact of this development. 5. The subject property is located north and east of the existing Mt. Olivet Cemetery on the south side of N.E. 3rd Street and east of Blaine Avenue N.E. Access to the cemetery is via Blaine Avenue N.E. through a residential area. Access to the grading site will be via a southerly extension of Edmonds Avenue N.E. • 6. The cemetery has been in operation for many years. The area of the proposed fill and grade project was formerly a surface mining operation. A special permit to fill and grade the subject property was issued on March 25, 1977,; and that permit has since expired. The applicant did not complete the fill and grade, and has applied for a new permit to continue the operation pursuant to Section 4-722(B) and 4-2301 (3) (A) , The applicant has also constructed an access to the northwest corner of the site. 7. The Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of public and quasi-public uses. 8. The subject property is zoned GS-1 (General ; Single Family Residential ; Minimum lot size - 35,000 square feet) . 9. The applicant, the Mt. Olivet Cemetery, proposes expanding the cemetery to encompass the subject property after it is graded and filled. A conditional use permit to allow a cemetery will be required to permit such expansion in the GS-1 zone (Section 4-722(F) (2) (a)) . 10. To the west are four single family homes and beyond those the Monterey Terrace Sub4ivision. East of the site is the Puget Power transmission line corridor. Easterly of the powerline is the Edwards/Rainier Sand and Gravel operation (See Special Permit File No. SP-099-80) . Other existing and former quarry operations :are located south and east of the site. The proposed ERADCO development is located south of the subject site and the Homecraft development is proposed north of the site. 11 . Mt. Olivet Cemetery has granted a 60-foot wide easement along the eastern boundary of the subject site to service the proposed ERADCO development. The city has recommended that this right-of-way be dedicated to the city for the eventual purpose of extending Edmonds Avenue along this alignment. The applicant has agreed to so dedicate the property. S -047-80 Page Three 12. No information was available on the amount of fill material which will be necessary to accomplish the work, and, therefore, no estimate can be made on the number of truck trips required to complete the work. This information should be presented in order to fully evaluate the impact of the operation on noise and traffic congestion. Section 4-2307(3) requires the submission of such information as part of the application. 13. The finished grade of the subject site will approach the finished grade of the existing cemetery, that is, approximately 285 feet. The grade to the north will approach this grade by a gradual increase from about 250 feet. The grade on the east will be raised approximately 20 to 35 feet above the level of the former surface mining pit. 14. Stabilization of the various filled slopes. will be necessary as well as rehabilitation of the site consisting of both landscaping and hydroseeding. Landscaping will be required to buffer the cemetery from the residential uses to the west of the site and landscaping will be required on the northern property line. The applicant agreed to provide a 50-foot buffer in each of these locations. The Planning Department indicated that the calculated cost of providing assurance of these requirements will be approximately 50 cents per square foot for the buffer and about four cents per square foot for the rehabilitation along the other filled portions of the site. CONCLUSIONS: 1 . The applicant's proposal to reclaim the former mining site for use as a cemetery appears to serve the public use and interest, and, therefore, subject to the conditions listed below, should be approved. 2. The approximately 11 acre site is characteristic of a former surface mining operation with cut raw slopes. The applicant intends to restore the contours of the site and raise the level of the site to match the elevations of the existing cemetery. The pit level is currently about 20 to 35 feet below the proposed finished grade. There will have to be a transitional slope between the new grade and the adjacent property to the east. The Public Works Department will have to approve the slope angle. In addition, the area will have to be stabilized by reforestation and hydroseeding. 3. The area west of the site provides the current access via Blaine Avenue N.E. This residential area should not be used to provide access for the large trucks conveying the fill material to the site. The access road from Blaine to the existing cemetery should be phased out with the construction of Edmonds Avenue N.E. 4. The hours of operation should be limited to minimize interference with the peak hour traffic on N.E. 3rd Street. The hours of operation should be limited to the weekdays of Monday through Friday between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 3:30 p.m. Also to minimize the impact of the fill operation on traffic and city roads, a cash bond in the amount of $2,000 should be posted with the city to provide that city crews can clear the streets of debris generated by the subject operation as necessary if that cleaning is not immediately accomplished by the applicant. ,/5. The site is not to be utilized as a solid waste dump, and, therefore, only naturally occuring materials such as earth, rock and gravel may be used to fill the site. 6. The permit should be issued for a period not to exceed three years. Any additional time increment shall be again subject to a public hearing and shall be applied for six months prior to the expiration of the current special permit. No annual license shall be issued without issuance of the special permit. 7. The applicantwill be required to dedicate to the city for road purposes a 60-foot wide right-of-way which shall be subject to the determination of the City of Renton but such, right-of-way shall be in or close to an alignment with a southerly extension of Edmonds Avenue N.E. 8. In order to buffer the residential uses west of the site and generally screen the cemetery use, a 50-foot landscape buffer shall be maintained along the north and west property lines. A bond in the amount of 50 cents per square foot should be ' -. ' posted to assure that the condition is complied with by the applicant. 11/ SP-047-80 Page- Four 9. The slope stability may be accomplished by a combination of methods subject to the approval of the Planning and Public Works Departments. Hydroseeding efforts and a bond to assure rehabilitation are calculated to cost four cents per square foot and a bond in this amount shall be posted. „.l15. The permit is issued solely for the purpose of bringing fill to the site from outside sources and no on-site removal or rziliLtzi12.9sjon of material is permitted under this permit. 11 . The temporary access road which has been constructed at the northwest corner of the site is to be closed and adequate safety provisions made at this location. 12. The applicant will have to submit sufficient data to allow the estimation of the number of vehicle trips, and this data may be used by the Public Works Department to determine what additional traffic control measures may need to be instituted subject to further review by the Hearing Examiner. DECISION: The special permit to fill and grade the subject site is approved for a period not to exceed three years subject to the following conditions: 1 . The applicant will apply for a renewal of the special permit six months prior to the expiration of this special permit if additional time is required. No annual license shall be issued without prior special permit approval and without prior satisfaction of all conditions enumerated below. 2. The posting of a bond in an amount sufficient to cover the costs of both landscaping the 50-foot buffers and rehabilitation and hydroseeding the subject site. The costs of such operations are 50 cents per square foot and four cents per square foot, respectively. 3. The hours of operation shall be limited to Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. 4. No access by trucks shall be permitted via Blaine Avenue N.E. Both the primary cemetery access and the supplementary access on the northwest corner of the subject property shall be closed as determined by the Planning and Public Works Departments and provision made to provide safe closures of both roadways. 5. A cash bond in the amount of $2,000 shall be posted with the city to permit the city crews to keep the city streets clear of debris generated by the subject fill operation. 6. The dedication of a 60-foot wide right-of-way to the city for the southerly extension of Edmonds Avenue N.E. 7. The provision and maintenance of a 50-foot landscape buffer along the northern and western property lines of the subject site. 8. All fill material shall consist of natural materials such as earth, rock and gravel . 9. Submission of information containing an estimate of the amount of fill material involved in the operation per city requirements, such information shall be subject to review of the Public Works Department and shall be used to determine what additional traffic control measures are necessary subject to further review of the Hearing Examiner. ORDERED THIS 13th day of March, 1981 . Fred J. K fman Land Use ring Examiner TRANSMITTED THIS, 13th day of March, 1981 by Affidavit of Mailing to the parties of record: Ted Gathe, Attorney at Law, 4111 E. Madison, Seattle, WA 98112 James Colt, P.O. Box 547, Renton, WA 98057 11/ SP .7-80 Page Five TRANSMITTED THIS 13th day of March, 1981 to the following: Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Richard Houghton, Acting Public Works Director David Clemens, Acting Planning Director Michael Porter, Planning Commission Chairman Barbara Schellert, Planning Commissioner Ron Nelson, Building Official Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of t i-t-y!s\Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before March 27, 1981) Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk accompanying a filing fee of $25.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall , or same may be purchased at cost in said department. PLEHNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING March 3 , 1981 APPLICANT: MT. OLIVET CEMETERY CO. , INC. FILE NO: SP-047-80 A. SUN NARY 6, PURPOSE OF REQUEST: The applicant seeks Special Permit approval for fill and grade of the +11 acre sute. B. GENERAL I lORMAT'ION: 1 . Owner of Record: American Memorial Services, Inc. 2. Applicant: Mt. Olivet Cemetery, Inc. 3. Location: • (Vicinity Map Attached) . Property located north and east of • the existing platted cemetery, east of N.E. 3rd St. , in the vicinity of 100 Blaine Avenue N.E. and the powerline right-of-way. 4 . Legal Description : A detailed legal . description is available on file in the Renton Planning Department. 5. Size of Property: +11 acres 6. Access : Via Blaine Avenue N. E. 7. Existing Zoning : GS-1 , General Classifi- cation District; • Minimum lot size 35, 00 square feet. 8 . Existing Zoning in the Area : GS-1 , S-1 , R-4 , R-3 , R-2 , R-1 9 . Comprehensive Land Use Plan : Public/Quasi-Public • 10. Notification: The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date. Notic was properly published in the Daily Record Chronicle on February 15, 1981 , and posted in three places on or near • • the site as required by City Ordinance on February 20,. 1981 . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: Mt. Olivet Cemetery SP-047-80 MARCH 3, 1981 PAGE TWO C. HISTORY/BACKGROUND : The platted portion of the cemetery property has been in existence for many years. The area of the subject application was previously used as a surface mining operation. The area immediately south of the cemetery property, owned by Stoneway Concrete, was recently re- zoned to various multi-family densities subject to pro- viding access along the east side of the subject site to N.E. Third Street. A Special Permit for fill and grade was approved by the Hearing Examiner on March 25, 1977 , for the site. D. PTYSICAL BACKGROUND: 1 . Topography: The site is quite irregular in topography with latge depressions as much as 30 feet below the existing level of the platted portion of the cemetery. 2. Soils : Everett gravelly sandy loam, 5-15% slopes (ErC) . Runoff is slow to medium and the erosion hazard is slight to moderate. This soil is used for timber and pasture and for urban development. A gravel pit covers much of the easterly portion of the property. 3. Vegetation: Very little vegetation exists on the site. That which does consists of scrub grass and some blackberries. 4 . Wildlife: The subject site provides very minimal habitat suitable for wildlife. 5. Water : Some surface water was observed on the .: , subject site (February 20, 1981 ) . 6. Land Use: The subject site is an abandoned surface mining operation. The existing platted portion of Mt. Olivet Cemetery is located directly adjacent on the south and west of the subject site. The power line right-of-way borders the site on the east with the existing Edwards pit operation located further eastward. The area north of the site is steeply wooded and undeveloped to N.E Third Street. Four existing single family residences are situated west of the subject site along Blaine Avenue N.E. Monterey Terrace single family residential community is located farther to the west, across Blaine Avenue N. E. E. NE/GMOREGOD CHARACTERISTICS: The area consists of primarily existing and abandoned surface mining operations , together with the cemetery use and some single family residential uses. F. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1 . Water and Sewer: A 16 inch water main, an 8. inch sanitary sewer main , and a 15 inch storm sewer • main are located along N.E. Third Street. _ 2. Fire Protection: Provided by the City of Renton as per ordinance requirements. 3. Transit : n/a 4 . Schools : n/a 5. Recreation: n/a PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: Mt. Olivet Cemetery SP-047-80 MARCH 3, 1981 PAGE THREE G. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1 . Section 4-722B; Special Permits 2. Section 4-729; "G" General Classification District 3. Chapter 23, Mining , Excavation, and Grading Ordinance H. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER Oii ICIAI. CITY DOCUMENT: 1 . Land Use Report, 1965 , Objectives, pages 17 and 18. I. IMPACT ON THE NATURAL OR HUMAN ENVIRONMENT: 1 . Natural Systems : Filling of the site will reclaim the existing pit area to a new use. Impacts may occur. during the filling process. However, these can be mitigated through proper controls and ordinance standards. 2. Population/Employment : Minor • 3. Schools : n/a 4 . Social: n/a 5. Traffic: Minor J. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRES4OLD DETERMINATION: : Pursuant to the City of Renton ' s Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, as amended, RCW 43-21C, a declaration of non-significance was issued for the proposal by the ERC on January 25 , 1981 . K. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED: 1 . City of Renton Building Division. 2. City' of Renton Engineering Division. 3. City, of Renton Traffic Engineering Division, 4 . City of Renton Utilities Division. 5. City of Renton Fire Department. L. PLANNING G DEPARTYZ.NT ANALYSIS: 1 . The applicant is requesting a special permit to fill and grade an abandoned surface mining area to provide for future expansion of an area for cemetery purposes. The present G zoning of the site would not allow an outright use as a cemetery and will require approval of a conditional use permit for the use of the fill site for cemetery purposes . 2. The applicant had obtained a special permit to do the necessary filling operation in 1977 under File No. SP-039 The proposal is identical with that presented in 1977 and use many of the existing plans with some modification of specific drainage plans. 3. � _ The proposed fill and grade will reclaim the previous surface mining pit areas located to the east and north of the existing cemetery and raise the grades to match the level of the existing cemetery. The intent appears to be to change the access and orientation of the cemeter from the west to the east along a proposed roadway which • will access the proposed ERADCO condominium complex. t2� PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: MT. OLIVET CEMETERY SP-047-80 MARCH 3, 1981 PAGE FOUR 4 . Along the eastern portion of the property the grade will be raised equal to that of the cemetery and the powerline easement area or approximately 20-35 feet above the existing bottom of the pit. This area is proposed as the first phase and is to be graded, hydroseeded and otherwise rehabilitated prior to the commencing of the fill of the remaining portion of the property on the north side of the cemetery. The northerly area is proposed . to be filled and graded to slope northward from the elevation of the existing cemetery (approximately 285 ' ) down to approximately the 250 foot elevation line. The top and slope of the existing hillside area at the northerly edge of the site and the trees within that area are to remain undisturbed. This will account for a 50 foot buffer along the northerly edge of the site. Also, the area along the westerly edge of the site adjacent to the single family residences is to remain undisturbed. This was required in the original special permit in 1977 and a 50 foot setback was required at that time. 5. The applicant anticipates that the operation will take an additional three years to complete. The original special permit has expired but the annual grading license has been continued as a result of the applicant ' s efforts to submit a new request for special permit to the Hearing Examiner. The Building Department has taken the official position of not placing a stop work order on the site until the Hearing Examiner has reached a decision. 6. Access to the site has been modified since the original special permit was issued in 1977. The Stoneway Company has constructed an access roadway for the ERADCO property which, when completed, will go along the eastern boundary of the subject site. This will provide ample access for the cemetery to conduct their fill operation. This access road is also being used by M.A. Segale in mining the Rainier Sand & Gravel Company pit located to the east. No access is anticipated over Blaine Avenue N.E. and should be specifically restricted. 7. Mt. Olivet Cemetery has provided a 60 foot private easement to ERADCO for accessing their development site to the south of Mt. Olivet Cemetery. The City has recently recommended to the Hearing Examiner on the Rainier Sand & Gravel special permit application that a new alignment for Edmonds Avenue N.E. be obtained from M.A. Segale Inc. to lineup with that presently dedicated to the City on the north side of N. E. 3rd Street. This 60 feet provided across Mt. Olivet Cemetery property to the ERADCO development would be the logical extension of Edmonds Avenue N. E. and should be required as a dedi- cation to address the traffic situation in a comprehensive manner. - Is- 8. The applicant ' s proposed operation contract is generally compatible with the ordinance requirements. Drainage plans submitted to the Public Works Department in May of 1977 do not address temporary sedimentation and drainage systems during construction. It is critical that sedimentation be controlled from the site so that it does not interfere with the water supply system of Mt. Olivet Cemtery. Storm water control was one of the primary issues in reviewing the Rainier Sand & Gravel site in relationship to Mt. Olivet Cemetery' s present operation and it is only reasonable that Mt. Olivet not disturb their own water supply from their fill operation. PLANNING DEPA___-TENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: MT. OLIVET CEMETERY, SP-047-80 MARCH 3 , 1981 PAGE FIVE 9. The hours of operation should be identical to those placed on the operation of Rainier Sand & Gravel Inc. which has been recommended by the Traffic Engineering Division to be from 8: 00 a.m. to 3 : 30 p.m. 10. Based upon the description of work methods and rehabili- tation Exhibit Al, submitted by the applicant, the Planning Department has no concerns except over the type of material used for fill. The site should not become a sanitary landfill or consist of materials such as car bodies, refrigerators, stoves or other bulk items and plastics. Plastics are a non-degradable material and will remain on the site forever causing unusual ground water patterns. M. DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Department recommendation is almost identical with the recommendation submitted to the Hearing Examiner on April - 12, 1977 for the original request. It is recommended by the Department that the Hearing Examiner approve the special permit for fill and grade, File No. SP-047-80 subject to the following conditions: 1 . Said permit shall be valid for a three-year period . from the date of approval subject to annual review and license requirements of Mining Excavation and Grading Ordinance. 2. Said permit shall not include the removal of existing- _ natural material from the site. 3. Requires conditional use permit for expansion of cemetery use. 4 . Interim drainage plans for filling operation shall be submitted to and approved by the Public Works Department. 5. All slopes and finished surfaces shall be hydroseeded as per Planning Department approval and ordinance requirements. Suitable bonding as per ordinance requirements shall be required to assure site rehabilitatic Bonding is suggested to be 4 cents per square foot. 6. Sanitary land fill or fill material consisting of plastics , car bodies, refrigerators , stoves , or other similar bulk items shall not be permitted on the subject site. 7. The applicant shall provide inspection per ordinance requirements by a qualified licensed engineer. Said engineer shall submit written status reports to the City semi-annually or by specific request of the Building Official. The first report shall be due June 1, 1981. 8. .A minimum 50 foot setback shall be staked and maintained along the west and north property lines. All existing vegetation shall be retained in its natural state within said setback areas. Additional landscaping and screening may be required by the Planning Department. No existing trees shall be cut or removed without prior approval of the Planning Department. Bond -- -- - should be required at 50 cents per square foot to assure compliance. PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: MT. OLIVET CEMETERY, SP-047-80 MARCH 3, 1981 PAGE .SIX 9. Access to the site shall be provided by the existing road extending from N.E. 3rd Street along the eastern boundary of the subject site. The existing Blaine Avenue N.E. shall not be utilized for access related to the subject fill and grade operation. 10. The 60 foot easement granted to ERADCO by Mt. Olivet Cemetery for the purpose of road construction shall be dedicated to the City of Renton for public street purposes: 11 . All work done shall be between the hours of 8: 00 a.m. and 3 : 30 p.m. weekdays only. 12. Suitable controls of dust and mud shall be provided per ordinance requirements. 13 . A minimum six foot fence and gate shall be constructed and maintained across the partially completed access road at the northwest corner of the site and extend a sufficient distance north and south to ensure adequate safety and isolation of the project area from Blaine Avenue N.E. 14.. Additional traffic control measures may be necessary due to potential truck traffic. The Public Works Department may require such additional measures if it determines a need during the course of the subject operation. , """•• \ %„.._ _ _ _ ......) --______-____ --...„.. ....,,...„ Fsi es i , .,—..-......— ____-________________ „...... I ,___---- ... Az5 10 ..:Y.t ...,,.....r .,e'r^w...., y.A.ks;t".f �R?...,it Je•"..-ems'.•+ -r..,,...�,l.1K.'. -a ' 74;..,..:43 ca.. i •,,,i,. , ,-ii,t -0,.... ...:. $ .,,-. .-.,v;-..,t,.:. Gi..„rt.... - _. .•-. .,.• . • -;... ':4 %). .,;-:I,' i .:.-.• t !lc. Q411) ..". d -, • " `� w , '- ,r. ,.,_ D. . ,,x. .a.,..e, ..41 A °C. 0 _ 7 ky; Y...-JI; . f' Sjjk I II., la_ ; ,err '{ F . :Oct] ....: • , • . ,, . : . ory ,'Lo f ib.j .. . . CI' " . 13 .,, 6} 7'' I ta.z.. ..: i 13 � , 1s 4 •"• • ____, ,& za 123 a (32 i x • 3 ril.,. „ � p _ _l__ __________ _ ____ __ _ >111...... ,.. cam . f-4 „:„.2;1 .. ._________ ,.....1 \i_ -,..,..,........,......_____ __N Pa 4 I :-R,,11 a .1 _ . I I 1 ✓j pJ S c.4L a /':4 oo' UU su4Jlcl5 tilt f I Mt Olivet Cemetery • SP-047-80 7 BANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING OF APRIL 12 , 1977 PAGE THREE RE : MT . OLIVET CEMETERY • CO. SPECIAL PERMIT 'FOR FILL AND GRADE J . IMPACTS ON NATURAL SYSTEMS: • Filling of the site will reclaim the existing pit area to a new use . Impacts may occur during the filling process . However , these can be mitigated through proper controls and ordinance standards . K. SOCIAL IMPACTS : Minor . L. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION : Pursuant to the City of Renton Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended (RCW 43. 216 ) , a Declaration of Non-significance has been issued for the subject proposal ( see attached ) . This is based on the rehabilitation of an existing blighted site and upon the establishment of reasonable conditions and fulfillment of ordinance requirements which will serve to mitigate potential environmental impacts . M. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION : A vicipity and site map are attached . N. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED: 1 . City of Renton Building Division 2 . City of Renton Engineering Division 3 . City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division 4 . City of Renton Utilities Division 5 . City of Renton Fire Department 0, DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: • 1 . The proposed fill and grade is necessary to permit further expansion within cemetery owned property. 2 . The applicant has stated that existing trees along the perimeter borders of the subject site will not be disturbed . There are no trees or significant vegetation within the primary areas of the / proposed operation . ✓ 3 . Fill material will consist of construction rubblelayeredkwith fill material from the subject site . Each lift or layer of construction material fill will be covered with suitable fill material from the site at the completion of each work day . - It will be necessary to require the monitoring of the operation by a licensed engineer with periodic written reports to the city . 4. The proposed fill and grade will reclaim the . orevious surface mining pit areas east and north of the existing cemetery and raise the grades to match the level of the existing cemetery. Along the eastern portion of the property the grade . will be raised equal to that of the cemetery and powerline easement area or approximately 20-35 feet above the existing bottom of the pit. This area is proposed as the first phase and is to be graded , • hydroseeded and otherwise rehabilitated prior to commencing fill of the remaining northerly area . The northerly area is proposed to be filled and graded to slope northward from the elevation of the existing cemetery (elevation approximately 285 ' ) down to approximately the 250 foot elevation line . The top and slope of S Ili i PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING OF APRIL 12 , 1977 PAGE FOUR . RE : MT . OLIVET CEMETERY CO . SPECIAL PERMIT FOR FILL AND GRADE .', the existing hillside area at the northerly edge of the site and the trees within that area are to remain undisturbed . Also , the area along the westerly edge of the site adjacent to the single family residences is to remain undisturbed . Setbacks and possible additional screening material should be established in ' these areas . 5 . The applicant has stated that the proposed operation will be completed within three years . The anticipated phasing will consist of completion of the easterly portion of the project including rehabilitation , prior to commencement of work within the northerly portion of the project . Time limits for the subject Special Permit should be established . 6 . There are several access alternatives to the subject site . Because of the amount and type of truck traffic generated by such an operation two of the alternatives are less desirable and may cause significant impacts to the neighborhood . These include ; ( 1 ) access via Blaine Avenue N . E . onto the Stoneway property and • around the south side of the cemetery property, and (2 ) access vi Blaine Avenue N . E . and the partially completed road onto the northwest corner of the subject property , and adjacent to the northernmost single family residence located along the east side of Blaine Avenue N. E. Utilization of either of these access alternatives will cause traffic safety problems , noise , and pollution to the residential neighborhood . The third access alternative via the existing road presently utilized in a one-way exit pattern extending from N . E . 3rd Street around the north side of the subject site , appears to be a safer , easier , and less disruptive access possibility than the other two alternatives . At the time this staff report was written there was some question as to the ownership of this access road . It is felt , however , that its utilization for access to the subject project , should be required for the benefit of both Mt . Olivet Cemetery and the existing neighborhood . 7 . The' applicant ' s proposed operation contract is compatible with ordinance requirements . No drainage plan has been provided to date . However , on-site retention ponds will be required as per ordinance to control erosion and runoff . This will be critical • primarily at the southeast and northwest corners of the site and along its northerly boundary . The northerly area may require terracing . This will also be subject to ordinance requirements . 8 . The hours of operation should be such that disruption to the residential neighborhood is minimized . P. PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION : Recommend approval of the special permit for fill and grade subject to the following conditions : 1 . Sai permit shall be valid for a three-year period from the dat of approval subject to annual review and license require- men s of Mining Excavation and Grading Ordinance . i. . 2 . Said permit shall not include the removal of existing natural material from the site . 3. The applicant shall submit detailed plans indicating the pro- posed reuse of the subject site prior to completion of the subject fill and grade operation . Such reuse plans shall be subject to site plan approval as per city ordinance require- ments . 4 . Interim drainage plans for filling operation shall be sub- . t 111 .ANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING OF APRIL 12 , 1977 PAGE FIVE RE : MT . OLIVET CEMETERY CO . SPECIAL PERMIT FOR FILL AND GRADE - 5 . All slopes and finished surfaces shall be hydroseeded as per Planning Department approval and ordinance requirements . Suitable bonding as per ordinance requirements shall be required to assure site rehabilitation . i/ 6 . Sanitary land fill or fill material consisting of car bodies , refrigerators , stoves , or other similar bulk items shall not be permitted on the subject site . 7 . The applicant shall provide inspection per ordinance require- ments by a qualified licensed engineer. Said engineer shall submit written status reports to the City semi -annually or by specific request of the City of Renton. 8 . A minimum 50 foot setback shall be staked and maintained along the west and north property lines . All existing vege- tation shall be retained in its natural state within said setback areas . Additional landscaping and screening may be required by the Planning Department . No existing trees shall be cut or removed without prior approval of the Planning Department . 9 . Access to the site shall be provided by the existing road extending from N . E . 3rd Street east around the northeast por- tion of the subject site . Such access shall be improved to Public Works Department and Grading Ordinance requirements . The existing Blaine Ave. N. E . shall not be utilized for access related to the subject fill and grade operation . 10. All work done shall be between the hours of 8 : 00 a .m. and 4 : 30 p .m . weekdays only. An extension of the working time may be permitted for emergencies as per ordinance require- ments . 11 . Suitable controls of dust and mud shall be provided per ordi - nance requirements . 12 . A minimum six foot fence and gate shall be required across the partially completed access road at the northwest corner of the site and extend a sufficient distance north and south to ensure adequate safety and isolation of the project area . 13 . All noise resulting from the operation and traffic generated from it shall be subject to the State Environmental Noise Levels . 14 . Additional traffic control measures may be necessary due to potential truck traffic . The Public Works Department may require such additional measures , if it determines a need during the course of the subject operation . • • 1 March 13, 1981 OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION. APPLICANT: Mt. Olivet Cemetery Co. , Inc. FILE NO. SP-047-80 LOCATION: Property located north and east of the existing platted cemetery, east of N.E. 3rd Street, in the vicinity of 100 Blaine Avenue N.E. and the powerline right-of-way. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant. seeks special permit approval' for fill and grade of an +11' acre site. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Planning Department Recommendation: Approval with conditions. Hearing Examiner Decision: Approval with conditions. PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department preliminary report was received by the REPORT: Examiner on February 25, 1981 . PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on March 3, 1981 at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and the applicant had received and reviewed the Planning Department preliminary report. Roger Blaylock, Associate Planner, presented the report, and entered the following exhibits into the record: Exhibit #1 : Application File containing Planning Department report and other pertinent documents Exhibit #2: Site Plan with Finished Elevations Exhibit #3: Vicinity Map The Examiner inquired regarding the proposed quantity of fill material and the number of potential truck trips generated by the project. Mr. Blaylock indicated that the subject had not been addressed. The Examiner requested testimony by the applicant. Responding was: Ted Gathe Attorney at Law 4111 E. Madison Seattle, WA 98112 Mr. Gathe advised that the Planning Department recommendations had been reviewed by the applicant and although there are no objections to the conditions, clarification is required on certain items by the applicant. Responding was: James Colt P.O. Box 547 Renton, WA 98057 Mr. Colt, the applicant, requested clarification of Condition No. 4 of the report which pertains to submission of interim drainage plans. He advised that drainage plans were included with plans for road construction filed previously on numerous occasions. He also indicated that Stoneway Concrete Co. had constructed the roadway and had agreed to correct any drainage problems which currently exist. Referencing Condition No. 11 , hours of operation, Mr. Colt indicated concurrence with the recommended hours as stated in the report. Regarding Condition No. 10, which recommends that the 60-foot easement granted to ERADCO by Mt. Olivet be dedicated to the City of Renton for public street purposes, Mr. Colt stated agreement to the dedication only upon completion of the roadway, noting that upon completion, the existing access on the western portion of the cemetery to V iros • - SP-047-80 Page Two Blaine Avenue N.E. would be closed. He requested that as a consideration of the dedication, the city vacate that strip of roadway from Blaine across the cemetery property. Responding to Mr. Blaylock's inquiry regarding the proposed quantity of fill material , Mr. Colt advised that in the original application 25,000 cubic yards of fill had been anticipated; however, due to the phasing procedure, the remaining figure is unknown. The Examiner requested testimony in support or opposition to the application. There was no response. He then invited final comments from the' Planning Department staff. Mr. Blaylock indicated the opinion of the department that dedication of the roadway would be necessary only if the ERADCO property is allowed to develop. Responding to Mr. Blaylock's comments regarding the Planning Department recommendation for vacation of Blaine Avenue N.E. , the Examiner advised that authority for approval of street vacations rests with the City Council . The Examiner requested further comments. Since none were offered, the hearing regarding File No. SP-047-80 was closed by the Examiner at 9:30 a.m. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1 . The request is for approval of a special permit to fill and grade an approximately +11 acre site. 2. The application file containing the application, SEPA documentation, the Planning Department report, and other pertinent documents was entered into the record as Exhibit #1 . 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton' s Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , R.C.W. 43.21 .C. , as amended, a Declaration of Non-Significance conditioned on hours of operation has been issued for the subject proposal by the Environmental Review Committee, responsible official . 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the impact of this development. 5. The subject property is located 'north and east of the existing Mt. Olivet Cemetery on the south side of N.E. 3rd Street and east of Blaine Avenue N.E. Access to the cemetery is via Blaine Avenue N.E. through a residential area. Access to the grading site will be via a southerly extension of Edmonds Avenue N.E. 6. The cemetery has been in operation for many years. The area of the proposed fill and grade project was formerly, a surface mining operation. A special permit to fill and grade the subject property was issued on March 25, 1977, and that permit has since expired. The applicant did not complete the fill and grade, and has applied for a new permit to continue the operation pursuant to Section 4-722(B) and 4-2301 (3) (A)) . The applicant has also constructed an access to the northwest corner of the site. 7. The Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of public and quasi-public uses. 8.. The subject property is zoned GS-1 (General ; Single Family Residential ; Minimum lot size - 35,000 square feet) . 9. The applicant, the Mt. Olivet Cemetery, proposes expanding the cemetery to encompass the subject property after it is graded and filled. A conditional use permit to allow a cemetery will be required to permit such expansion in the GS-1 zone (Section 4-722(F) (2) (a)) . 10. To the west are four single family homes and beyond those the Monterey Terrace Subdivision. East of the site is the Puget Power transmission line corridor. Easterly of the powerline is the Edwards/Rainier Sand and Gravel operation (See Special Permit File No. SP-099-80) . Other existing and former quarry operations ,are located south and east of the site. The proposed ERADCO development is located south of the subject site and the Homecraft development is proposed north of the site. 11 . Mt. Olivet Cemetery has granted a 60-foot wide easement along the eastern boundary of the.'subject site to service the proposed ERADCO development. The city has recommended that this right-of-way be dedicated to the city for the eventual purpose of extending Edmonds Avenue along this alignment. The applicant has agreed to so dedicate the property. WAD IMP SP-047-80 Page Three 12. No information was available on the amount of fill material which will be necessary to accomplish the work, and, therefore, no estimate can be made on the number of truck trips required to complete the work. This information should be presented in order to fully evaluate the impact of the operation on noise and traffic congestion. Section 4-2307(3) requires the submission of such information as part of the application. 13. The finished grade of the subject site will approach the finished grade of the existing cemetery, that is, approximately 285 feet. The grade to the north will approach this grade by a gradual increase from about 250 feet. The grade on the east will be raised approximately 20 to 35 feet above the level of the former surface mining pit. 14. Stabilization of the various filled slopes will be necessary as well asrrehabilitation of the site consisting of both landscaping and hydroseeding. Landscaping will be required to buffer the cemetery from the residential uses to the west of the site and landscaping will be required on the northern property line. The applicant agreed to provide a- 50-foot buffer in each of these locations. The Planning Department indicated that the calculated cost of providing assurance of these requirements will be approximately 50 cents per square foot for the buffer and about four cents per square foot for the rehabilitation along the other filled portions of the site. CONCLUSIONS: 1 . The applicant' s proposal to reclaim the former mining site for use as a cemetery appears to serve the public use and interest, and, therefore, subject to the conditions listed below, should be approved. 2. The approximately 11 acre site is characteristic of a former surface mining operationtw-ith cut raw slopes.("The applicant intends to restore the contours of the site and raise the level of the site to match the elevations of the existing cemetery. The pit level is currently about 20 to 35 feet below the proposed finished grade. There will have to be a transitional slope between the new grade and the adjacent property to the east. The Public Works Department will have to approve the slope angle. In addition, the area will have to be stabilized by reforestation and hydroseeding. 3. The area west of the site provides the current access via Blaine Avenue N.E. This residential area should not be used to provide access for the large trucks conveying the fill material to the site. The access road from Blaine to the existing cemetery should be phased out with the construction of Edmonds Avenue N.E. 4. The hours of operation should be limited to minimize interference with the peak hour traffic on N.E. 3rd Street. The hours of operation should be limited to the weekdays of Monday through Friday between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 3:30 p.m. Also to minimize the impact of the fill operation on -traffic and city roads, a cash bond in the amount of $2,000 should be postedwith the city to provide that city crews can clear the streets of debris generated by the subject operation as necessary if that cleaning is not immediately accomplished by the applicant. 5. The site is not to be utilized as a solid waste dump, and, therefore, only naturally occuring materials such as earth, rock and gravel may be used to fill the site. . 6. The permit should be issued for a period not to exceed three years. Any additional time increment shall be again subject to a public hearing and shall. be applied for six months prior to the expiration of the current special permit. No annual license shall be issued without issuance of the special permit. ; 7. The applicant will be required to dedicate to the city for road purposes a 60-foot wide right-of-way .which shall be subject to the determination of the City of Renton but such right-of-way shall be in or close to an alignment with a southerly extension of Edmonds Avenue N.E. 8. In order to buffer the residential uses west of the site and generally screen the cemetery use, a 50-foot landscape buffer shall be maintained along the north and west property lines. A bond in the amount of 50 cents per square foot should be posted to assure that the condition is complied with by the applicant. 1 SO • SP-047-80 Page Four 9. The slope stability may be accomplished by a combination of methods subject to the approval of the Planning and Public Works Departments. Hydroseeding efforts and a bond to assure rehabilitation are calculated to cost four cents per square foot and a bond in this amount shall be posted. 10. The permit is issued solely for the purpose of bringing fill to the site from outside sources and no on-site removal or redistribution of material is permitted under this permit. 11 . The temporary access road which has been constructed at the northwest corner of the site is to be closed and adequate safety provisions made at this location. 12. The applicant will have to submit sufficient data to allow the estimation of the number of vehicle trips, and this data may be used by_the Public Works Department to determine what additional traffic control measures may need to be instituted subject to further review by the Hearing Examiner. DECISION: The special permit to fill and grade the subject site is approved for a period not to exceed three years subject to the following conditions: 1 . The applicant will apply for a renewal o•f the special permit six months prior to the expiration of this special permit if additional time is requi "red. No annual license shall be issued without prior special permit approval and without prior satisfaction of all conditions enumerated below. 2. The posting of a bond in an amount sufficient to cover the costs of both landscaping the 50-foot buffers and rehabilitation and hydroseeding the subject site. The costs of such operations are 50 cents per square foot and four cents per square foot, respectively. 3. The hours of operation shall be limited to Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. 4. No access by trucks shall be permitted via Blaine Avenue N.E. Both the primary cemetery access and the supplementary access on the northwest corner of the subject property shall be closed as determined by the Planning and Public Works Departments and provision made to provide safe closures of both roadways. 5. A cash bond in the amount of $2,000 shall be posted with the city to permit the city crews to keep the city streets clear of debris generated by the subject fill operation. 6. The dedication 'of a 60-foot wide right-of-way to the city for the southerly extension of Edmonds Avenue N.E. 7. The provision and maintenance of a 50-foot landscape buffer along the northern and western property lines of the subject site. 8. All fill material shall consist of natural materials such as earth, rock and gravel . 9. Submission of information containing an estimate of the amount of fill material involved in the operation per city requirements, such information shall be subject to review of the Public Works Department and shall be used to determine what additional traffic control measures are necessary subject to further review of the Hearing Examiner. ORDERED THIS 13th day of March, 1981 . Fred J. K fman Land Use ring Examiner TRANSMITTED THIS 13th day of March, 1981 by Affidavit of Mailing to the parties of record: Ted Gathe, Attorney at Law, 4111 E. Madison, Seattle, WA 98112 James Colt, P.O. Box 547, Renton, WA 98057 f M SP-047-80 Page Five TRANSMITTED THIS 13th day of March, 1981 to the following: Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Richard Houghton, Acting Public Works Director David Clemens, Acting Planning Director Michael Porter, Planning Commission Chairman Barbara Schellert, Planning Commissioner Ron Nelson, Building Official Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before March 27, 1981 . Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the. City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk accompanying a filing fee of $25.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection in the Finance• Department, first floor of City Hall , or same may be purchased at cost in said department. • • , ' ,�,t r`� '`f. S.' I •�. ` ... �/, 'l ;`t ..,/ "1 .'}`lt .ey•\'.\e:{!: j ,rl �6 `�A J .. h :,..11 ,1\ � ft . 7I`' �J.. - t�•Ja wrn �_)ty lV' .- ��i.: •'�.�{ .i�• Iydl{ •� 1 •i • \ • ..v,- _II Ak,.. ,____....,__,..1 .. .4Q, _! • .1 .. .,. -_,_.„ --1_, : • 7\ • ! ..„.., . - v,f c_: . . — . ,: -1. , . 1 f: ; . ii • t� .. • PA. #r.c c.¢ �_.s= r � '.:--. 1 k:i 4 ;; '" : , �t { — • - , I I L. t J:, 7 -7=1 .1 -. VAL Ij t B1 ' p • /` `� E j t. • ®1.,tr ••.,• ; . " ' ' +.1+r — °'� , 1, ;10 • .��. J ..!r ii., . ,`.`�' R J • ,b' ` +l.l'I,• .� C f, .i ,,,__,, ..,, .....______,/ • ,,,,, , , ,........_ . i,ENTON CITY LIMITS i" Q�' i \ `k 6 I . i A• 'lam _ t �r.' T $T_ r' . • ...�•.0.r...,sue-a,�,.sx:• G-.--6• .a - .or .mom - SPECIAL PERMIT: • MT. OLIVET CEMETERY CO. , INC. ; Appl . SP-047-80--special permit to fill and grade in GS-1 zone ; property located north and east of the existing platted cemetery, east of N.E . 3rd St . , in the vicinity of 100 Blaine Ave. N.E. between Blaine Ave . N .E. and the powerline right-of-way . APPLICANT Mt. Olivet Cemetery Co . , Inc. 1 0TAL AREA ±11 . 3 acres PRINCIPAL ACCESS Blaine Ave . N .E. GS--1 Residential Single family 35 , 000 Sq . Ft. EXIS-1 lNG ZONING__ __ -------- • EXISTING USE Undeveloped Y }'ifl and grading operation; future reuse of site PROPOSED USE for expansion of cemetery area.• -- COMPREHEN'S,IVE LA;:D USE PLAN Public/Quasi-Public • COMMENTS ---- ---------------------•- •--•---- ------------ -----------.-___ _. - • i-.v- ... -z_ a-.s»_M_.-_. �•-sir• a..v .c-- i >s- _[.. s:e .r.-c•c_.=_. ..-c_.-.__r E[..[-e,V LK.-.sS ...e'-•t3 -•_ a +1 • OF R�� 40 ,x..0,.f, ° THE CITY OF RENTON o/ .,. '" MUNICIPAL BUI LDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 NAL o amm. 'Y. �' BARBARK. Y.' SHINPOCH, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING,EXAMINER p Q.co• FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 9,�FD SEPTEM' March 26, 1981 < < Mr. Ted Gathe Attorney at Law 4111 E. Madison St. Seattle, WA 98112 RE: File No. SP-047-80; Mt. Olivet'Cemetery Co. , Inc. Special Permit; Request for Reconsideration. • Dear Mr. Gathe: I have reviewed your request for reconsideration and find that there is no merit in the request, and, therefore, the request to modify the decision is denied. The subject proposal was processed as a fill and grade application and no mention was made that the property was to be utilized as a solid waste fill site. The Mining, Excavation and Grading Ordinance distinguishes the two types of operations; fills are processed pursuant to Section 4-2316 while solid waste fills are reviewed pursuant to the procedures of Section 4-2317. Section 4-2316(4) specifies the type and nature of material permitted, and the limitation contained within the Examiner's report is therefore reasonable to provide for the public health, safety and welfare by providing a stable, compact surface on the subject site. A new appeal period has now been established for this matter to expire on April 9, 1981 . Yours very truly, Fred J. Kaufman Hearing Examiner cc: Parties of Record f. RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAM:%::R 2 r1i, `a J i 4 ! 5 6 OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON 7 In re Application of ) . 8 ) File No. SP-047-80 MT. OLIVET CEMETERY CO. , INC. ) 9 for a special permit ) REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION 10 ) 11 Comes now Mt. Olivet Cemetery Company, Inc. by and through its 12 attorney Theodore H. Gathe and requests the hearing examiner for 13 the City of Renton to reconsider and modify the following items. 14 1 . Applicant requests that the hearing examiner reconsider 15 Conclusion No. 5 of the Hearing Examiner' s Report and Recommen- 16 dation which states as follows: 17 5 . The site is not to be utilized as a solid waste dump, and, therefore , only naturally 18 occurring materials such as earth, rock and gravel may be used to fill the site. 19 2 . Applicant requests that the hearing examiner reconsider 20 and modify Condition No. 8 in the Hearing Examiner ' s Report and 21 Recommendation which reads as follows: 22 8 . All fill materials shall consist of 23 natural materials such as earth, rock and gravel. 24 3 . The applicant requests that the Hearing Examiner recon- 25 sider Conclusion 10 which reads as follows: 26 Conclusion 10 : The permit is issued solely 27 for the purpose of bringing fill to the site from outside sources and no non-site removal or 28 redistribution of material is permitted under this permit. 29 ARGUMENT: 30 As the hearing examiner pointed out in Finding No. 6 in the 31 32 Request for Reconsideration -1 THEODORE H.GATHE,P.S. Attorney at Law 4111 East Madison Street Seattle,Washington 98112 206/328-2204 1 'eport and Recommendation, a special permit to fill and grade the 2 _ubject property was issued in 1977 and subsequently expired in 3 1980 . The city permitted an interim filling use on the property in 4 iew of the ongoing operation and the fact that the fill and grade 5 •lan had not yet been completed. 6 In a preliminary report to the Hearing Examiner dated April 12 , 7 977 (a copy of which is attached hereto) the applicant, Mt. Olivet 8 emetery Co. , Inc. requested a special permit for a fill and grade 9 .peration in order to rehabilitate an abandoned surface mining area 10 and to include that reclaimed area as part of the Mt. Olivet 11 emetery grounds. Page 1 of the Preliminary Report to Hearing 12 Examiner by the Planning Department indicated that the proposed 13 fill shall consist of solid waste, including broken concrete, 14 bricks, wood and other construction rubble. On Page 3 of the 15' Planning Department ' s Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner, 16 Department Analysis No. 3 provided as follows: 17 3 . Fill material will consist of construc- tion rubble layered from fill material from the 18 construction site. Each lift or layer of con- struction material fill will be covered with 19 suitable fill material from the site at the completion of each work day . . . . 20 On Page 5 of said Preliminary Report, the Planning Department 21 recommended to the Hearing Examiner approval of the special permit 22 for fill and grade subject to certain conditions. Among those con- 23 ditions was the following: 24 6 . Sanitary land fill or fill material con- 25 sisting of car bodies, refrigerators, stoves, or other similar bulk items shall not be permitted 26 on the subject site. 27 After a land use hearing on April 12, 1977 the land use Hearing 28 Examiner for the City of Renton recommended approval of the appli- 29 cation on April 22, 1977 . Included among his Findings of Fact, 30 Conclusions and Conditions were the following: 31 32 Request for Reconsideration -2 THEODORE H.GATHE,P.S. Attorney at Law 4111 East Madison Street Seattle,Washington 98112 206/328-2204 1 Finding No. 2: The area adjacent to the subject property has been heavily excavated 2 throughout the years leaving large cavities as remnants of those former operations. The appli- 3 cant is proposing to reclaim one of those existing cavities by filling, using a variety of fill 4 materials approved and specified by the City' s Mining and Grading Ordinance. (emphasis added ) 5 Finding No. 7: The specific types of material 6 that are prohibited are specified in the City 's Mining and Grading Ordinance. 7 . The recommendation of the Hearing Examiner was approval subject 8 to the Planning Department 's Recommendation Nos. 1 through 14 . 9 Included among those 14 conditions proposed by the Planning 10 Department was Condition No. 6 cited herein: 11 6 . Sanitary land fill or fill material 12 consisting of car bodies, refrigerators, stoves, or other similar bulk items shall not be per- 13 mitted on the subject site. 14 Based on the Recommendation and Report of the Hearing Examiner, 15 Mt. Olivet proceeded to begin its fill and grade operation. In 16 accordance with the earlier recommendation of the Hearing Examiner, 17 Mt. Olivet accepted only construction debris and other items per- 18 mitted under solid waste fills. At no time has Mt. Olivet allowed 19 the dumping of any items permitted under the sanitary land fill 20 provisions or any fill material consisting of plastics, car bodies, 21 refrigerators, stoves, or other similar bulk items not permitted on 22 the subject site. 23 On March 3 , 1981 the Planning Department presented a 24 Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner with regard to the above 25 mentioned application. Item 10 of the Planning Department 's analy- 26 sis provided as follows: 27 10 . Based upon the description of work 28 methods and rehabilitation A-1 submitted by the applicant, the Planning Department has no concerns . 29 except over the type of material used for fill. The site should not become a sanitary land fill or 30 consist of materials such as car bodies, regriger- ators, stoves or other bulk items and plastics. 31 32 Request for Reconsideration -3 THEODORE H.GATHE,P.S. Attorney at Law 4111 East Madison Street • Seattle,Washington 98112 206/328-2204 1 Plastics are a non-degradable material and will remain on the site forever causing unusual ground 2 water patterns. 3 The Planning Department recommended approval of the subject 4 site stating as follows: 5 The Planning Department recommendation is almost identical with the recommdation submitted 6 to the Hearing Examiner on April 12, 1977 for the original request. It is recommended by the Depart- 7 ment that the Hearing Examiner approve the special permit for fill and grade file no. SP-047-80 sub- 8 ject to the following conditions: 9 Among those conditions was the following: 10 Condition 6: Sanitary land fill or fill material consisting of plastics, car bodies, 11 refrigerators, stoves or other similar bulk items shall not be permitted on the subject 12 site. 13 As set forth above, the Hearing Examiner in the present appli- 14 cation recommended that the site not be utilized as a solid waste 15 dump and permitted only natural occurring materials such as earth, 16 rock and gravel to be used to fill the site. The applicant has 17 never had any intent to turn the subject site into a sanitary land 18 fill. Its only intent is to reclaim the property in the most effe- 19 cient and timely process. Without the ability to fill the subject 20 area with construction debris which has been the practice in the 21 past under theprevious application, and which is a pp , practice which 22 has continued up to the present date, Mt. Olivet does not have the 23 financial resources to complete the fill and grade operation using 24 onlyearth, rock and gravel. Nor does Mt. Olivet believe that such 25 a filling operation could be completed within the time period 26 allowed under this permit. 27 The applicant is agreeable to any condition restricting the 28 utilization of any materials normally permitted in a solid waste 29 dumping site with the exception of construction debris which has 30 been used to fill the site in the past. 31 32 Request for Reconsideration -4 THEODORE H.GATHE,P.S. Attorney at Law 4111 East Madison Street Seattle,Washington 98112 206/328-2204 • 1 The applicant did not address itself to the question of the 2 fill material since it concurred with the staff 's preliminary 3 report to the Hearing Examiner including Item 10 on Page 5 referred 4 to herein. The applicant requests that the Hearing Examiner modify 5 Conclusion No. 5 to correspond with the Planning Department's 6 Preliminary Report as set forth in Item 10, Page 5 as follows: 7 The site should not become a sanitary land fill or consist of materials such as car bodies, 8 refrigerators, stoves or other bulk items and plastics. 9 As an alternative to that recommendation, the applicant suggests 10 that the Hearing Examiner permit fill material consisting of 11 construction rubble layered with fill material from the subject 12 site as recommended in the previous application. 13 As described above, under the original application application 14 15 for the fill and grade operation of the subject site, the applicant 16 was using fill material consisting of construction rubble layered 17 with fill material from the subject site. Item 0 of the original 18 Preliminary Report of the Hearing Examiner dated April 12, 1977 19 provided as follows: 20 Each lift or layer of construction material fill will be covered with suitable fill material 21 from the site at the completion of each work day. (emphasis added) 22 A literal reading of Conclusion 10 of the Hearing Examiner 's 23 decision would restrict redistribution of material necessary to 24 cover each layer of construction material fill. Since the granting 25 of the original permit, Mt. Olivet has back filled the construction 26 material with fill material from its own site. To now require it 27 to obtain fill material from an outside source would be prohibiti- 28 vely expensive. 29 SUMMARY: 30 With the exceptions noted herein, the applicant is in full 31 32 Request for Reconsideration -5 THEODORE H.GATHE,P.S. Attorney at Law 4111 East Madison Street Seattle,Washington 98112 206/328-2204 • 1 agreement with the decision of the Hearing Examiner with regard to 2 this application. If the applicant is permitted to complete the 3 fill and grade operation on the site using the material that has 4 been used heretofore and back filling that material from the sub- 5 ject site, the Mt. Olivet property can be quickly and efficiently 6 reclaimed and turned into additional cemetery and green space pro- - 7 perty. The applicant requests that the Hearing Examiner reconsider 8 the items mentioned herein and make additional findings, conclu- 9 sions and conditions as are appropriate. 10 Respectfully submitted March a , 1981. 11 THEODORE H. GATHE, P.S. 12 13 BY _l il' 1�ote4/04 Theodore H. Gathe 14 Attorney for Mt. Olivet Cemetery 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 • 27 28 29 30 31 32 Request for Reconsideration —6 THEODORE H.GATHE,P.S. Attorney at Law 4111 East Madison Street Seattle,Washington 98112 206/328-2204 RECEIVED 1 CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER 2 MAR 251981 7,8191follitim I'��d3 0213,4E5o� 4 A 5 6 OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON 7 In re Application of ) 8 ) File No. SP-047-80 MT. OLIVET CEMETERY CO. , INC. ) 9 for a special permit ) REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION 10 ) 11 Comes now Mt. Olivet Cemetery Company, Inc. by and through its 12 attorney Theodore H. Gathe and requests the hearing examiner for 13 the City of Renton to reconsider and modify the following items. 14 1. Applicant requests that the hearing examiner reconsider 15 Conclusion No. 5 of the Hearing Examiner' s Report and Recommen- 16 dation which states as follows: 17 5 . The site is not to be utilized as a solid waste dump, and, therefore, only naturally 18 occurring materials such as earth, rock and gravel may be used to fill the site. 19 2 . Applicant requests that the hearing examiner reconsider 20 and modify Condition No. 8 in the Hearing Examiner's Report and 21 Recommendation which reads as follows: 22 8 . All fill materials shall consist of 23 natural materials such as earth, rock and gravel. 24 3 . The applicant requests that the Hearing Examiner recon- 25 sider Conclusion 10 which reads as follows: 26 Conclusion 10: The permit is issued solely 27 for the purpose of bringing fill to the site from outside sources and no non-site removal or 28 redistribution ,of material is permitted under this permit. 29 ARGUMENT: 30 As the hearing examiner pointed out in Finding No. 6 in the 31 32 Request for Reconsideration -1 THEODORE H.GATHE,P.S. Attorney at Law 4111 East Madison Street Seattle,Washington 98112 206/328-2204 I\_ 1 'eport and Recommendation, a special permit to fill and grade the 2 -ubject property wa,s issued in 1977 and subsequently expired in 3 1980. The city permitted an interim filling use on the property in 4 iew of the ongoing operation and the fact that the fill and grade 5 •lan had not yet been completed. 6 In a preliminary report to the Hearing Examiner dated April 12, 7 977 (a copy of which is attached hereto) the applicant, Mt. Olivet 8 emetery Co. , Inc. requested a special permit for a fill and grade 9 operation in order to rehabilitate an abandoned surface mining area 10 and to include that reclaimed area as part of the Mt. Olivet 11 Cemetery grounds. Page 1 of the Preliminary Report to Hearing 12 Examiner by the Planning Department indicated that the proposed 13 fill shall consist of solid waste, including broken concrete, 14 bricks, wood and other construction rubble. On Page 3 of the 15 Planning Department's Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner, 16 Department Analysis No. 3 provided as follows: 17 3 . Fill material will consist of construc- tion rubble layered from fill material from the 18 construction site. Each lift or layer of con- struction material fill will be covered with 19 suitable fill material from the site at the completion of each work day . . . . 20 On Page 5 of said Preliminary Report, the Planning Department 21 recommended to the Hearing Examiner approval of the special permit 22 for fill and grade subject to certain conditions. Among those con- 23 ditions was the following: . 24 6. Sanitary land fill or fill material con- 25 sisting of car bodies, refrigerators, stoves, or other similar bulk items shall not be permitted 26 on the subject site. 27 After a land use hearing on April 12, 1977 the land use Hearing 28 Examiner for the City of Renton recommended approval of the appli- 29 cation on April 22, 1977 . Included among his Findings of Fact, 30 Conclusions and Conditions were the following: 31 32 Request for Reconsideration -2 THEODORE H.GATHE,P.S. Attorney at Law 4111 East Madison Street Seattle,Washington 98112 206/328-2204 • 1 Finding No. 2: The area adjacent to the subject property has been heavily excavated 2 throughout the years leaving large cavities as remnants of those former operations. The appli- 3 cant is proposing to reclaim one of those existing. cavities by filling, using a variety of fill 4 materials approved and specified by the City's Mining and Grading Ordinance. (emphasis added) 5 Finding No. 7: The specific types of material 6 that are prohibited are specified in the City's Mining and Grading Ordinance. 7 The recommendation of the Hearing Examiner was approval subject 8 to the Planning Department's Recommendation Nos. 1 through 14 . 9 Included among those 14 conditions proposed by the Planning 10 Department was Condition No. 6 cited herein: 11 6 . Sanitary land fill or fill material 12 consisting of car bodies, refrigerators, stoves, or other similar bulk items shall not be per- 13 mitted on the subject site. 14 Based on the Recommendation and Report of the Hearing Examiner, 15 Mt. Olivet proceeded to begin its fill and grade operation. In 16 accordance with the earlier recommendation of the Hearing Examiner, 17 Mt. Olivet accepted only construction debris and other items per- 18 mitted under solid waste fills. At no time has Mt. Olivet allowed 19 the dumping of any items permitted under the sanitary land fill 20 provisions or any fill material consisting of plastics, car bodies, 21 refrigerators, stoves,, or other similar bulk items not permitted on 22 the subject site. 23 On March 3 , 1981 the Planning Department presented a 24 Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner with regard to the above 25 .mentioned application. Item 10 of the Planning Department's analy- 26 sis provided as follows: 27 10 . Based upon the description of work 28 methods and rehabilitation A-1 submitted by the applicant, the Planning Department has no concerns 29 except over the type of material used for fill. The site should not become a sanitary land fill or 30 consist of materials such as car bodies, regriger- ators, stoves or other bulk items and plastics. 31 32 Request for Reconsideration -3 THEODORE H.GATHE,P.S. Attorney at Law 4111 East Madison Street Seattle,Washington 98112 206/328-2204 • 1 Plastics are a non-degradable material and will remain on the site forever causing unusual ground 2 water patterns. 3 The Planning Department recommended approval of the subject 4 site stating as follows: 5 The Planning Department recommendation is almost identical with the recommdation submitted 6 to the Hearing Examiner on April 12, 1977 for the original request. It is recommended by the Depart- 7 ment that the Hearing Examiner approve the special permit for fill and grade file no. SP-047-80 sub- 8 ject to the following conditions: 9 Among those conditions was the following: 10 Condition 6: Sanitary land fill or fill material consisting of plastics, car bodies, 11 refrigerators, stoves or other similar bulk items shall not be permitted on the subject 12 site. 13 As set forth above, the Hearing Examiner in the present appli- 14 cation recommended that the site not be utilized as a solid waste 15 dump and permitted only natural occurring materials such as earth, 16 rock and gravel to be used to fill the site. The applicant has 17 never had any intent to turn the subject site into a sanitary land 18 fill. Its only intent is to reclaim the property in the most effe- 19 cient and timely process. Without the ability to fill the subject 20 area with construction debris which has been the practice in the 21 past under the previous application, and which is a. practice which 22 has continued up to the present date, Mt. Olivet does not have the 23 financial resources to complete the fill and grade operation using 24 only earth, rock and gravel. Nor does Mt. Olivet believe that such 25 a filling operation could be completed within, the time period 26 allowed under this permit. 27 The applicant is agreeable to any condition restricting the 28 utilization of any materials normally permitted in a solid waste 29 dumping site with the exception of construction debris which has 30 been used to fill the site in the past. 31 32 Request for Reconsideration -4 THEODORE H.GATHE,P.S. Attorney at Law 4111 East Madison Street Seattle,Washington 98112 206/328-2204 1 The applicant did not address itself to the question of the 2 fill material since it concurred with the staff 's preliminary 3 report to the Hearing Examiner including Item 10 on Page 5 referred 4 to herein. The applicant requests that the Hearing Examiner modify 5 Conclusion No. 5 to correspond with the Planning Department' s 6 Preliminary Report as set forth in Item 10 , Page 5 as follows: 7 The site should not become a sanitary land fill or consist of materials such as car bodies, 8 refrigerators, stoves or other bulk items and plastics. 9 As an alternative to that recommendation, the applicant suggests 10 that the Hearing Examiner permit fill material consisting of 11 construction rubble layered with fill material from the subject 12 site as recommended in the previous application. 13 As described above, under the original application application 14 for the fill and grade operation of the subject site, the applicant 15 16 was using fill material consisting of construction rubble layered 17 with fill material from the subject site. Item 0 of the original 18 Preliminary Report of the Hearing Examiner dated April 12, 1977 19 provided as follows: 20 Each lift or layer of construction material fill will be covered with suitable fill material 21 from the site at the completion of each work day. (emphasis added) 22 A literal reading of Conclusion 10 of the Hearing Examiner 's 23 decision would restrict redistribution of material necessary to 24 cover each layer of construction material fill. Since the granting 25 of the original permit, Mt. Olivet has back filled the construction 26 material with fill material from its own site. To now require it 27 to obtain fill material from an outside source would be prohibiti- 28 vely expensive. 29 SUMMARY: 30 With the exceptions noted herein, the applicant is in full 31 32 Request for Reconsideration -5 THEODORE H.GATHE,P.S. Attorney at Law 4111 East Madison Street Seattle,Washington 98112 206/328-2204 1 agreement with the decision of the Hearing Examiner with regard to 2 this application. If the applicant is permitted to complete the 3 fill and grade operation on the site using the material that has 4 been used heretofore and back filling that material from the sub- 5 ject site, the Mt. Olivet property can be quickly and efficiently 6 reclaimed and turned into additional cemetery and green space pro- 7 perty. The applicant requests that the Hearing Examiner reconsider 8 the items mentioned herein and make additional findings, conclu- 9 sions and conditions as are appropriate. , 10 Respectfully submitted March o2.s , 1981. 11 THEODORE H. GATHE, P.S. 12 ; 13 BY i 4-d /ai Theodore H. Gathe 14 Attorney for Mt. Olivet Cemetery 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Request for Reconsideration -6 THEODORE H.GATHE,P.S. Attorney at Law 4111 East Madison Street Seattle,Washington 98112 206/328-2204 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING State of Washington) County of King ) Marilyn J. Petersen being first duly sworn, upon oath disposes and states: That on the 13th day of March , 19 81 , affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. tS Subscribed and sworn this \� day of haccl. , 19 _ I . Notary Public in and for the St to of Washington, residing at Application, Petition or Case: Mt. Olivet Cemetery Co. , Inc. ; SP-047-80 (The minute's contain a tist of the paA i.es ac necand. ) March 13, 1981 OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION APPLICANT: Mt. Olivet Cemetery Co. , Inc. FILE NO. SP-047-80 LOCATION: Property located north and east of the existing platted cemetery, east of N.E. 3rd Street, in the vicinity of 100 Blaine Avenue N.E. and the powerline right-of-way. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant seeks special permit approval for fill and grade of an +11 acre site. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Planning Department Recommendation: Approval with conditions. Hearing Examiner Decision: Approval with conditions. PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department preliminary report was received by the REPORT: Examiner on February 25, 1981 . PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on March 3, 1981 at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and the applicant had received and reviewed the Planning Department preliminary report. Roger. Blaylock, Associate Planner, presented the report, and entered the following exhibits into the record: Exhibit #1 : Application File containing Planning Department report and other pertinent documents Exhibit #2: Site Plan with Finished Elevations Exhibit #3: Vicinity Map The Examiner inquired regarding the proposed quantity of fill material and the number of potential truck trips generated by the project. Mr. Blaylock indicated that the subject had not been addressed. The Examiner requested testimony by the applicant. Responding was: Ted Gathe Attorney at Law 4111 E. Madison Seattle, WA 98112 Mr. Gathe advised that the Planning Department recommendations had been reviewed by the applicant and although there are no objections to the conditions, clarification is required on certain items by the applicant. Responding was: James Colt P.O. Box 547 Renton, WA 98057 Mr. Colt, the applicant, requested clarification of Condition No. 4 of the report which pertains to submission of interim drainage plans. He advised that drainage plans were included with plans for road construction filed previously on numerous occasions. He also indicated that Stoneway Concrete Co. had constructed the roadway and had agreed to correct any drainage problems which currently exist. Referencing Condition No. 11 , hours of operation, Mr. Colt indicated concurrence with the recommended hours as stated in the report. Regarding Condition No. 10, which recommends that the 60-foot easement granted to ERADCO by Mt. Olivet be dedicated to the City of Renton for public street purposes, Mr. Colt stated agreement to the dedication only upon completion of the roadway, noting that upon completion, the existing access on the western portion of the cemetery to SP-047-80 Page Two Blaine Avenue N.E. would be closed. He requested that as a consideration of the dedication, the city vacate that strip of roadway from Blaine across the cemetery property. Responding to Mr. Blaylock's inquiry regarding the proposed quantity of fill material , Mr. Colt advised that in the original application 25,000 cubic yards of fill had been anticipated; however, due to the phasing procedure, the remaining figure is unknown. The Examiner requested testimony in support or opposition to the application. There was no response.. He then invited final comments from the Planning Department staff. Mr. Blaylock indicated the opinion of the department that dedication of the roadway would be necessary only if the ERADCO property is allowed to develop. Responding to Mr. Blaylock's comments regarding the Planning Department recommendation for vacation of Blaine Avenue N.E. , the Examiner advised that authority for approval of street vacations rests with the City Council . The Examiner requested further comments. Since none were offered, the hearing regarding File No. SP-047-80 was closed by the Examiner at 9:30 a.m. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1 . The request is for approval of a special permit to fill and grade an approximately +11 acre site. 2. The application file containing the application, SEPA documentation, the Planning Department report, and other pertinent documents was entered into the record as Exhibit #1 . 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , R.C.W. 43.21 .C. , as amended, a Declaration of Non-Significance conditioned on hours of operation has been issued for the subject proposal by the Environmental Review Committee, responsible official . 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected ,by the impact of this development. 5. The subject property is located-north and east of the existing Mt. Olivet Cemetery on the south side of N.E. 3rd Street and east of Blaine Avenue N.E. Access to the cemetery is via Blaine Avenue N.E. through a residential area. Access to the grading site will be via a southerly extension of Edmonds Avenue N.E. 6. The cemetery has been in operation for many years. The area of the proposed fill and grade project was formerly a surface mining operation. A special permit to fill and grade the subject property was issued on March 25, 1977,,, and that permit has since expired. The applicant did not complete the fill and grade, and has applied for a new permit to continue the operation pursuant to Section 4-722(B) and 4-2301 (3) (A)) , The applicant has also constructed an access to the northwest corner of the site. 7. The Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of public and quasi-public uses. 8.. The subject property is zoned GS-1 (General ; Single Family Residential ; Minimum lot size - 35,000 square feet) . 9. The applicant, the Mt. Olivet Cemetery, proposes expanding the cemetery to encompass the subject property after it is graded and filled. A conditional use permit to allow a cemetery will be required to permit such expansion in the GS-1 zone (Section 4-722(F) (2) (a)) . 10. To the west are four single family homes and beyond those the Monterey Terrace . Subdivision. East of the site is the Puget Power transmission line corridor. Easterly of the powerline is the Edwards/Rainier Sand and Gravel operation (See Special Permit File No. SP-099-80) . Other existing and former quarry operations';are located south and east of the site. The proposed ERADCO development is located south of the subject site and the Homecraft development is proposed north of the site. 11 . Mt. Olivet Cemetery has granted a 60-foot wide easement along the eastern boundary . of the subject site to service the proposed ERADCO development. The city has recommended that this right-of-way be dedicated to the city for the eventual purpose of extending Edmonds Avenue along this alignment. The applicant has agreed to so dedicate the property. 6 - OF R� & �y f z THE ' CITY OF RENTON _ x <'1+1 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 Z "'*.kt, o mow BARBARA'. yi SHINPOCH, MAYOR a LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER \q1. 235-2593 ED SEPSE‘, �� O July 16, 1982 it tar,, ♦ r./ • CITY CLERK •a4 Mr. James Colt f Mt. Olivet Cemetery Company, , Ipc. • P.O. Box 547 Renton, WA 98057 'm,; RE: File No. SP-047-80; Mt. Olivet Cemetery Company Special Permit; Appeal of Administrative Determination. Dear Mr. Colt: • I have reviewed the correspondence and files pertaining to the above • entitled matter, and find that the letters and facts cannot now be read to constitute a timely appeal . The "administrative decision" you are now attempting to appeal is , in fact, related to a condition set forth in a decision issued on March 13, 1981 . In fact, you did then appeal from certain of the conditions required, but .n,ot the condition you now challenge. The time to appeal that decision .was within fourteen (14) days of that decision. It would circumvent the time limits established by ordinance to permit an "administrative" appeal of the imposition of conditions required by a decision which had its own time limits for appeal . e If further information is required regarding this matter, you may contact our office. Sincerely, ` Fred J. Kaufman Hearing Examiner cc: viclty Clerk Building & Zoning Department Mayor . City Attorney • . 1 • .�JI MT. OLIVES' CEMETERY COMPANY, INC. [ P.O. BOX 547 RENTON, WA 98055 (20Ei) 255-032:3 July 15 , 1982 • • RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON Hearing Examiner ' HEARING EXAMINER City of Renton JUL151982 Municipal Bldg. AM PM 200 Mill Ave. ; So . 7t819110111iI2t1a::4t5,G Renton , WA 98055 A� Dear Mr . Kaufman, The City has determined that their letter of April 29th is an administrative decision and with regard to •our letter of May 13 , 1982 requesting an appeal of that decision, we here- by request that the Hearing Examiner establish a date for a hearing with regard to the City ' s position that the Cemetery now dedicate the ERADCO-Kent-Highlands easement to the City for a public street . At hearings held by the Planning and Development Commi- ttee surrounding the new alignment of Edmonds Avenue , N . E . , the City determined that the requirement for the dedication of property, as a matter of law, to extend Edmonds Avenue , is not reasonably related to permit applications and was not necessary to make the application compatible with the object" ives of the comprehensive plan. Further testimony on March 13 , 1981 in .file #SP-047-80 indicates that Mt . Olivet agreed to dedicate the ERADCO ease- ' ment for public street purposes only upon completion of the roadway . . Further in Finding #11 , you found that the ease- ment granted to ERADCO on our easement right-of-way be dedi- cated for extending Edmonds Avenue ALONG THIS ALIGNMENT . Mr . Blaylock also testified on page 2 , paragraph 3 , that the ded- ication of the roadway would, be necessary ONLY if the ERADCO property is allowed to 'develop . . • When we attended the Hearing with regard to the appeals filed under the SP-099-80 , for which no transcript was kept , the Planning and Development Committee and City departments concurred that the conditions requiring the dedication of properties as a matter of law, was not reasonable. They re- ' SERVING KING COUNTY SINCE 1875 - . 4. Page 2 . Mr . Kaufman July 15 , 1982 • moved the requirement from the Segale application and further re-• moved the requirement when issuing Mt . Olivet ' s annual license . In light of the fact that the City will not permit the con- struction of the 'roadway "along this alignment" and as the type of roadway and whether or not it will ever be constructed is a ques- tion before the Courts . The cemetery requests a hearing so that . testimony can be received and a determination can be made with regard to the roadway , the change in the City ' s position (which now requires dedication prior• to the issuance of our annual license . ) A public hearing is required so that we may address adequately , the City ' s new determination . 'nce ames L. Colt President • Mt . Olivet Cemetery Co . , Inc-. JLC : dkc cc : William Bulchis (i.r`-r( CA R K OF R�� $ © ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR z OOp co� MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 • 04I TE'0 SEPIO° BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR July 1, 1982 Mr. Jim Colt Mt. Olivet Memorial Cemetery P.O. BOX 547 Renton, Washington 98055 RE: SP-047-80/MT. OLIVET MEMORIAL CE AETERY Dear Mr. Colt: Based upon review of the record of File No. SP-047-80, it is evident that Condition No. 6 has not been complied with by the applicant. It required dedication of a sixty (60) foot right-of-way for a public street along your eastern property line for the extension of Edmonds Avenue N.E. Unless the City of Renton receives the deed to this property in question by August 17, 1982, the Annual Fill License (B-8527) will not be re-issued and the Special Permit for fill and grade, SP-047-80, will be revoked. Sincerely, late Roger J. Blaylock Zoning Administrator RJB:cl Paci Land Reclamation DIV. MT. OLIVET CEMETERY CO., INC. P. O. BOX 547, RENTON, WA. 98055 (206) 255-7479 CITY OF RENTON March 11, 1982 ni, i TO U ULI MAR 111982 City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 ' li il�C ' > P� �i: %Pr. Attention: Mr. Ron Nelson P`°04r7"' Dear Ron: Per my discussions with you and Mr. Hanson of the past few weeks, I have attached copies of the site plan covering the Mt. Olivet Cemetery property and the existing and future buildings. Our exist- ing fill permit for the continued reclamation of the mined areas to the north permits our continued development of that area of the cemetery with imported fill materials for approximately three more years. We are working with "Ivary and Associates" on building plans for a permanent chapel to replace the chapel we are currently using. The cemetery will also submit appropriate building plans for a cemetery office to be a permanent replacement for the modular office which was destroyed by fire, the general locations of which appear on the Master Plan. We are placing a construction trailer at the entrance to the landfill on the eastern boundary of the cemetery to be used during the balance of our building permit as outlined in Mr. Hanson's letter to us. This facility will provide us with the necessary space for our engineers and personnel to supervise our landfill under our existing permit. If there are any questions regarding the continued improvement and operations of Mt. Olivet Cemetery, don't hesitate to call me. Sincerely M RY CO. , INC. M s L. Colt, P ident JLC:ks attachment Site Restoration — Land Fill — Project Development OF 40 THE CITY OF RENTON �/ Q z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON.WASH.98055 p ai BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • DELORES A. MEAD 09-0 �o CITY CLERK 0•TED SEP1°6 May 11 , 1981 Mr. Ted Gathe Attorney at Law 4111 East Madison Seattle, Washington 98112 RE: Appeal filed by Mt. Olivet Cemetery Special Permit SP-047-80 Dear Mr. Gathe: The Renton City Council at its regular meeting of May 11 , 1981 , considered your appeal of the Hearing Examiner's decision of March 13, 1981 . The City Council concurred in the Planning and Development Committee report which found the Hearing Examiner in error and modified his decision. A copy of the Renton City Council minutes of May 11 , 1981 , are attached for your information. If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Very truly yours, 72 '1 `'`"4-s Maxine Motor Deputy Clerk MM:gh cc: Mr. James Colt Enclosure cc: Mayor Planning Commission Chairman Council President Planning Commissioner Public Works Director Building Official Planning Director City Attorney 1 . PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT May 11 , 1981 APPEAL - MT. OLIVET CEMETERY, INC. SP-047-80 (Referred 4/20/81 ) The Planning and Development Committee has considered the appeal filed by Mt. Olivet Cemetery, Inc. from the Hearing Examiner' s decision dated March 13, 1981 and, finding that the Hearing Examiner is' in_error as a matter of law in limit- ing the fill material to consist -only of natural materials instead of materials as provided in Section 4-2317 of the City Code, the Committee recommends that the City Council modify the decision as follows: 1 . Conclusion No. 10 should be modified to strike the words "or redistribution". 2. Conclusion No. 5 and Condition No. 8 of the decision should be modified to read as follows: "All fill material shall consist of natural materials such as earth, rock and gravel and man-made construction debris • such as asphalt, brick, cement, wood and stumps and rebar." 3. Condition No. 9 should be modified to add the following language: "The annual license required by Section 4-2308 shall not be issued until the Public Works Department shall have approved an engineer- ing report to be provided by the applicant pursuant to Section 4-2310 in which the Public Works Department is satisfied that the applicant' s operations are in compliance with Section 4-2317." 714, Rand R r h y ill Chairman Earl C ymer !tom `G John Reed I1, A OF R�av 44) BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR 0 � MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 09gTFD SEPT�MOQ April 29, 1982 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR Mr. Jim Colt Mt. Olivet Cemetery P.O. Box 547 Renton, Washington Subject: Special Perim' P-047-80,Mom. Olivet Cemetery Dear Mr. Colt: During our review of the proposed P.U.D. for Monterey Terrace Associates/ERADCO we reviewed all pending and approved land use applications in the general area. It was discovered that you have not complied with the special permit requirement #6 to dedicate the necessary 60 foot right-of-way for the extension of Edmonds Avenue N.E. We also checked the special permit for Rainier Sand & Gravel concerning the possible deletion of that requirement. It appears that only that portion of the extension within their subject property was modified and did not affect your property. From the record, your attorney at that time, Mr. Theodore Gathe, was present and did not make any inquiries or objections to the Council action. Since you accepted the special permit and have continued your filling operation and did not file an appeal, we will expect you to comply with all of the conditions and submit the necessary deeds to the City by May 30, 1982. We believe that the situation is just a simple oversight. Also, while I was on vacation you made an inquiry as to the need for permits to expand the cemetery. In the Hearing Examinr's report for SP-047-80 he clearly states that it will be necessary for you to go through site plan approval. In addition, all ceme- teries are required to obtain Conditional Use Permit approval under Section 4-722(F) (2) (a) . Sincerely, Roger J. Blaylock • Zoning Administrator IF/ . For. Use By City Cl"-k's Office Only A. I .. # j AGENDA ITEM RENTON CITY COUNCIL MEETING SUBMITTING Dept./Div./Bd./Comm. City Clerk' s Office For Agenda Of April 20, 1981 (Meeting Date) Staff Contact Del Mead, City Clerk (Name) , Agenda Status: SUBJECT: Appeal of Hearing Examiner's Decision Consent Olivet Cemetery, Inc. SP-047-80 Public Hearing Correspondence Ordinance/Resolution Old Business Exhibits: (Legal Descr. , Maps, Etc. ),Attach New Business Study Session A. Appeal Other B. Hearing Examiner' s Decision 3/13/81 C. City Clerk' s Letter. 4/10/81 Approval : Legal Dept. Yes No N/A COUNCIL ACTION RECOMMENDED: Refer to Finance Dept. Yes No. N/A • Other Clearance Planning FISCAL IMPACT: • Expenditure Required $ Amount $ Appropriation- Budgeted Transfer Required SUMMARY (Background information, prior action and effect of implementation) (Attach additional pages if necessary. ) Appeal filed by Theodore .Gath, Attorney for Olivet Cemetery, Inc. Received 4/9/81 . PARTIES OF RECORD/INTERESTED CITIZENS TO BE CONTACTED: . SUBMIT THIS COPY TO CITY CLERK BY. NOON ON THURSDAY WITH DOCUMENTATION. NEED ? COPIES TO: ;ENT x CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE x RECORD CHRONICLE (PRESS) x MAYOR' S OFFICE X CITY COUNCIL I I FINANCE DEPARTMENT X HEARING EXAMINER x x PLANNING DEPARTMENT X PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR , x PARK DEPARTMENT PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT P.-0 . OF R�� �_� 0 ® z , THE CITY OF RENTON imi MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 oo BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • DELORES A. MEAD 94 `D' CITY CLERK • (206) 235-2500 o14, SEP1" April 10, 1981 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON) ) ss. COUNTY OF KING ) DELORES A. MEAD, City Clerk of the City of Renton, being first duly sworn On oath, deposes and says that she is a citizen of the United 11/ States and a resident of the State of Washington, over the age of 21 and /1 not a party to nor interested in this matter. That on the 10th day of April , 1981 , at the hour of 5:00 p.m. , your affiant duly mailed and placed in the United States Post Office at Renton, King County, Washington, by first class mail , to all parties of record, a true and correct NOTICE OF APPEAL OF THE HEARING EXAMINER' s DECISION FILED BY THEODORE H. GATHE, ATTORNEY FOR MT. OLIVET CEMETERY, INC. Special Permit SP-047-80. Delores A. Mead, City Clerk SUBSCRIBED! AND SWORN TO BEFORE me this 10th day of April , 1981 . Notary Public in and:for- -the State of Washington, residing in Kihg -. County st � a (. L 7 OF RA, ,. o THE . CITY OF RENTON _, `$ ® Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 n la g rn BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • DELORES A. MEAD 09.) QUO' CITY CLERK • (206) 235-2500 91 TFD SEpl. • April 10, 1981 APPEAL FILED BY THEODORE H. GATHE, ATTORNEY FOR MT. OLIVET CEMETERY, INC. RE: Appeal of Land Use Examiner's Decision dated March 13, 1981 , Special Permit; SP047-80 To Parties of Record: Pursuant to Title 4, Chapter 30, City Code, written appeal of Land Use Hearing Examiner's decision has been filed with the City Clerk, along with the proper fee of $25.00. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the written appeal and other pertinent documents will be reviewed by the Council 's Planning and Development Committee and will be considered by the City Council when the matter is reported out of Committee. Please contact the Council Secretary 235-2586, for date and time of the committee and council meetings, should you desire to attend. Yours very truly, / CITY OF RENTON „atie-Lui a Y2.ezt Delores A. Mead, C.M.C. City Clerk DAM/ss • CITY •OF RENTON No. 17774 FINANCE DEPARTMENT RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 - q 19 vI RECEIVED OF W\4-. C)Q.I.AIQ (9,5 o o i - TOTAL a 5 v 0 GWEN E. MARSH , INANCE DIRECTOR BY � . April 25 , 1977 OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER • CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. . - APPLICANT: Mt. Olivet Cemetery Co. , FILE NO. SP-034-77 Inc. , American Memorial Services, Inc. LOCATION: Property located north and east of the existing platted cemetery, east of N.E. 3rd St. , in the vicinity of 100 Blaine Ave. N.E. between Blaine Ave. N.E. and the powerline right-of-way. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Applicant requests special permit for fill and grade in order to rehabilitate abandoned surface mining areas and include as future expansion area for the existing Mt. Olivet Cemetery. Proposed fill shall consist of solid waste, including broken concrete, bricks , wood, and - other construction rubble. SUMMARY OF Planning Department: Recommend approval subject • RECOMMENDATION: to conditions. Hearing Examiner: Recommend approval subject to conditions . PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department staff report was received REPORT: by the Examiner on April 5 , 1977. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows : The hearing was opened on April 12 , 1977 , at 7 : 30 p.m. in the 4th floor conference room of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were sworn. It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and Mr. James L. Colt, representing the applicant, had received and reviewed the Planning Department report , and the report was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. Michael Smith, Planning Department, reviewed Exhibit #1 , and entered the following additional exhibits into the record: Exhibit #2 : Topography Map. • Exhibit #3A: Existing Platted Area Map. Exhibit #3B: Proposed Contour Map. Exhibit #3C: Elevation Cross-Section Diagram. The Examiner referred to Item #0. 3. of Exhibit #l , regarding operation monitoring of fill material. In response, Mr. Smith indicated that the city and the applicant shared the monitoring responsibility , and that a condition had been imposed to require hiring a licensed engineer to monitor the fill operation and submit periodic written reports to the city. In response to the Examiner ' s inquiry, Mr. Smith reported SP-034-77 Page Two that the city' s Mining and Grading Ordinance specifies the type of fill material which would be prohibited.-. - In reference to Item #0. 6. of Exhibit #1 relating'to access't . alternatives, The Examiner inquired about the stipulated access alternative the applicant had selected. Mr. Smith indicated that the matter had been resolved with the applicant, and access would_ .-. be via the existing road presently utilized in a one-way exit. pattern extending from N.E. 3rd Street around the north' side of the subject site, and that he had negotiated an acceptable agreement with the owner of the roadway. Mr. Smith reported the subject property contained existing ponding areas along the northern boundaries of the site which could be used. for potential on-site retention ponds. He indicated that the - applicant had submitted a work contract detailing compaction, stabilization, slope height,- and permitted work hours. The contract was entered into the record as Exhibit #4. • The Examiner asked Mr. Smith to present further information which had been submitted after the application deadline. Mr. Smith indicated there was no additional information. • The Examiner asked Mr. Colt if he concurred with the staff report. Mr. Colt reported.his concurrence. • The Examiner asked for additional comments in favor of 'the application. There was no response. . The Examiner asked for testimony in opposition to the application. Responding was : Mr. Elroy Brady 142 Blaine Avenue N.E. Renton, WA 98055 • Mr. Brady reported that he was an abutting property owner to the proposed project and inquired about the intent of the application. The Examiner indicated that the application request pertained to fill and grade only. Mr. Brady reported having no objection to the request but felt that the area might be suitable for single family residential lots rather than cemetery use. Mr. Smith indicated that the GS-1 zoning would allow single family residential lots of 35 ,000 square feet which would not be an average subdivision lot size, but that the property could be platted at a later date by request to the city. The Examiner asked for further testimony in opposition to the request. There was no response. The Examiner indicated his concern to Mr. Colt regarding the content of the fill material, and reported that stipulations are specified in the Mining and Grading Ordinance which imposes a fine for violations. Mr. Colt reported his intent to conform to the ordinance. The Examiner asked for additional comments . Since there were none , the hearing on Item #SP-034-77 was closed by the Examiner at 8 :20 p.m. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS: Having reviewed the record in this matter, .the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicant is requesting a special permit to fill and grade an abandoned surface mining area to provide future expansion area for cemetery purposes. 2 . The area adjacent to the subject property has been heavily excavated throughout the years leaving large cavities a-s remnants of these former operations. The applicant is proposing to reclaim one of those existing cavities by filling, using a variety of fill material approved and specified by the city's Mining and Grading Ordinance. SP-034-77 Page Three 3. The size of the property is 11. 3 acres and abuts an existing single family residential area on the west side, abuts a powerline right- of-way on the east side, . and a proposed multiple family area lies directly south of Mt. Olivet Cemetery which is contiguous 'to the. • subject proposal. The north side of the property is presently-' . - vacant. � . =x'_ .a f 4 . The proposed operation will reclaim an existing pit area and may during the filling operation impart certain impacts, through the hauling operation. However, it is the determination of the - Planning Department that these potential impacts can be mitigated through proper controls and ordinance standards 5. Pursuant to the City of Renton' s Environmental Ordinance e„! , Gordon Y. Ericksen, responsible official, has issued a Declaration of Non-Significance. This was based on the rehabilitation -of an - existing blighted site and upon the establishment of reasonable conditions in fulfillment of ordinance requirements which will serve to mitigate potential environmental impacts. All departments have been contacted and their reports were considered by the Planning Department in formulating their recommendation.- - --"-- 6. The applicant, James L. Colt, stated that he has received the Planning Department staff report, has reviewed the report, and is in concurrence with the Planning Department' s recommendations. In response to a concern by the Examiner regarding the monitoring . of responsibility of an ongoing filling operation to determine - adequate fill material, Mr: Smith, Planning Department representa- tive, indicated that the city and the applicant have joint monitoring responsibility and a condition can be imposed to require hiring a licensed engineer to monitor the fill operation if it is considered necessary. The applicant is also responsible for submitting periodic written reports to the city.- 7. The specific types of material that are prohibited are specified in the city' s Mining and Grading Ordinance. 8. In regard to potential access, it has been stated by the Planning Department that access will be via an existing road presently utilized in a one-way existing pattern extending from N.E. 3rd Street around the north side of the subject site. A work contract has been submitted to the staff for their approval detailing compaction, stabilization, slope height and permitted work hours. This contract was entered into the record and is known as Exhibit #4 . Mr. Brady, single family resident owning property to the west of the subject site, indicated that he had no objection to the request. However , he was concerned that an adequate buffer be maintained between the residences and the proposed operation. 9 . The Planning Department report accurately sets forth the issues, findings of fact, applicable policies and provisions and departmental recommendations in this matter, and this report itself, being uncontested, is hereby attached as Exhibit #1 and incorporated in this report by reference as is set forth in full herein. CONCLUSIONS: 1 . The proposed fill and grade is necessary to permit further expansion within the cemetery-owned property. 2 . The applicant has indicated that existing trees along the borders of the subject site will not be disturbed. It has been stated that there are no trees or significant vegetation within the primary areas of the proposed operation. Therefore, this application will not have a detrimental effect and will not significantly alter existing vegetation. ► � SP-034-77 Page Four 3 . In order to eliminate potential adverse effects this fill will have on adjacent properties , each layer or lift of construction material fill will be covered at the end of the day with suitable fill material from the site. This will, be monitored and will be reported periodically through written. reports to the city. 4 . This is one method of reconstructing a former blighted area: - to a constructive use that will basically remain as a permanent open space area. The' existing cemetery is one of the oldest.-. - cemeteries in -the city and its location has been accepted through the years. The ' extension of this cenetery is a natural condition. that will not be unusual and will not conflict with existing land uses in this area. The applicant has stated that the proposed operation will be in effect over a three-year periodhi extension of this time should be re-evaluated by aTrenewal of : the proposed special permit.` s_ RECOMMENDATION: - - ' - _ Recommend approval subject to the Planning Department recommendations , numbers 1 through 14. In addition to the Planning Department recommendations , the Hearing Examiner recommends that the top surface of the proposed fill shall be composed of dirt, gravel, loam or material suitable for cemetery use to not less than 7 feet below the • final established grade. ORDERED THIS 22nd day of April , 1977. • a As' a t L Use friea ing Examiner TRANSMITTED THIS 22nd day of April , by an Affidavit of Mailing to the parties of record: James L. Colt Rasool Doneshvar Mr. & Mrs. E. B. Brady George Pritchard TRANSMITTED THIS 22nd day of April , 1977 to the following: Mayor Charles J. Delaurenti Council President George J. Perry Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Warren C. Gonnason, . Public Works Director Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director Pursuant to Ordinance No. 3071 , Section 4-3015 , request for reconsideration or notice of appeal must be filed in writing on or before May 6 , 1977. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedures, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by' the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner' s written decision. This request shall set forth ehe specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. I p , f 7 PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING APRIL 12 , 1977 • APPLICANT: MT. OLIVET CEMETERY CO. , INC . AMERICAN MEMORIAL SERVICES, INC . FILE NO . : SP-034-77 ; SPECIAL PERMIT FOR FILL AND GRADE v// A. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Applicant requests special permit for fill and grade in order to rehabilitate abandoned surface mining areas and include as future expansion area for the existing Mt. Olivet Cemetery . Proposed fill shall consist of solid waste , including broken concrete , bricks , wood , and other construction rubble . B. GENERAL INFORMATION : 1 . Owner of Record : AMERICAN MEMORIAL SERVICES , INC . 2 . Applicant : AMERICAN MEMORIAL SERVICES , INC . 3. Location : Property located north and east of the existing platted cemetery , east of N . E . . 3rd St. , , in the vicinity of 100 Blaine Ave . N . E . between Blaine Ave . N . E . and the powerline right-of-way . 4 . Legal Description : Detailed legal description available on file in the Renton Planning Department . 5 . Size of Property : 11 . 3 Acres 6 . Access : Blaine Ave . N . E . or existing private access road . 7 . Existing Zone : GS-1 , General Classification District , Single Family Residential . 8 . Existing Zoning GS- 1 , S- 1 , R-4 , R-3 , R-2 , R-1 . in Area : 9 . Comprehensive Public and Quasi -public . Land Use Plan : 10 . Notification : The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date . Notice was properly published in the Record Chronicle and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City ordinance . C. PURPOSE OF REQUEST: To permit filling and rehabilitation of pre-existing gravel pit opera- tion , thus providing future expansion area for cemetery purposes . D. HISTORY/BACKGROUND: The platted portion of the cemetery property has been in existence for many years . The area of the subject application was previously used as a surface mining operation . The area immediately south of the cemetery property , owned by Stoneway Concrete , was recently rezoned to various multi -family densities subject to providing access along the east side of the subject site to N . E . Third St . r LANNING DEPARTMENT ' PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING OF APRIL 12 , 1977 PAGE TWO RE : MT . OLIVET CEMETERY CO. SPECIAL PERMIT FOR FILL AND GRADE E. PHYSICAL BACKGROUND: 1 . Topography : The site is quite irregular in topography with large depressions as much as 30 feet below the existing level of the platted portion of the cemetery . 2 . Soils : Gravel pit consisting of sandy , gravelly , granular material . 3. Vegetation : Scrub grass , brush , and Scotch Broom interspersed with deciduous and evergreen trees along the northerly and west- erly perimeter of the site . 4 . Wildlife : The existing vegetation may provide suitable habitat for small birds and mammals native to the area . 5 . Water : No surface water or ground water appears to exist on the subject site . . . 6 . Land Use : The subject site is an abandoned surface mining opera- tion . The existing platted portion of Mt. Olivet Cemetery is located directly adjacent on the south and west of the subject site . The powerline right-of-way borders the site on the east with existing surface mine operations located farther eastward . The area north of the site is steeply wooded and undeveloped to N . E. Third St. Four existing single family residences are situated west of the subject site along Blaine Ave . N . E . Mon- terey Terrace single family residential community is located farther to the west , across Blaine Ave . N . E . F, NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS : The area consists of primarily existing and abandoned surface mining operations , together with the cemetery use and some single family residential uses . G . PUBLIC SERVICES : 1 . Water and Sewer : A 16" water main , an 8" sanitary sewer main , and a 15" storm sewer main are located along N . E . Third St. 2 . Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Department as per ordinance requirements . 3 . Transit : Not applicable . 4 . Schools : Not applicable . 5 . Parks and Recreation : Not applicable . H. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1 . 4-729G , General Classification District . 2 . 4-706 , R-1 , Residence Single Family. 3 . 4-707 , S-1 , Suburban Residence District. 4 . Chapter 23 , Mining , Excavation , and Grading Ordinance . I . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENTS : 1 . Land Use Report , 1965 , Objectives , pages 17 and 18 . • SP-047-80 Page Three 12. No information was available on the amount of fill material which will be necessary to accomplish the work, and, therefore, no estimate can be made on the number of truck trips required to complete the work. This information should be presented in order to fully evaluate `the impact of the operation on noise and traffic congestion. Section 4-2307(3) requires the submission of such information as part of the application. 13. The finished grade of the subject site will approach the finished grade of the existing cemetery, that is, approximately 285 feet. The grade to the north will approach this grade by a gradual increase from about 250 feet. The grade on the east will be raised approximately 20 to 35 feet above the level of the former surface mining pit. 14. Stabilization of the various filled slopes will be necessary as well as rehabilitation of the site consisting of both landscaping and hydroseeding. Landscaping will be required to buffer the cemetery from the residential uses to the west of the site and landscaping will be required on the northern property line. The applicant agreed to provide a 50-foot buffer in each of these locations. The Planning Department indicated that the calculated cost of providing assurance of these requirements will be approximately 50 cents per square foot for the buffer and about four cents per square foot for the rehabilitation along the other filled portions of the site. CONCLUSIONS: 1 . The applicant's proposal to reclaim the former mining site for use as a cemetery appears to serve the public use and interest, and, therefore, subject to the conditions listed below, should be approved. ..r 2. The approximately 11 acre site is characteristic of a former surface' mining operation with cut raw slopes. The applicant intends to restore the contours of the site and raise the level of the site to match the elevations of the existing cemetery. The pit level is currently about 20 to 35 feet below the proposed finished grade. There will have to be a transitional slope between the new grade and the adjacent property to the east. The Public Works Department will have to approve the slope angle. In addition, the area will have to be stabilized by reforestation and hydroseeding. 3. The area west of the site provides the current access via Blaine Avenue N.E. This residential area should not be used to provide access for the large trucks conveying the fill material to the site. The access road from Blaine to the existing cemetery should be phased out with the construction of Edmonds Avenue N.E. 4. The hours of operation should be limited to minimize interference: with the peak hour traffic on N.E. 3rd Street. The hours of operation should be limited to the weekdays of Monday through Friday between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 3:30 p.m. Also to minimize the impact of the fill operation on traffic and city roads, a cash bond in the amount of $2,000 should be posted with the city to provide that city crews can clear the streets of debris generated by the subject operation as necessary if that cleaning is not immediately accomplished by the applicant. 5. The site is not to be utilized as a solid waste dump, and, therefore, only naturally occuring materials such as earth, rock and gravel may be used to fill the site. 6. The permit should be issued for a period not to exceed three years. Any additional time increment shall be again subject to a public hearing and shall. be applied for six months prior to the expiration of the current special permit. No annual license shall be issued without issuance of the special permit. 7. The applicant will be required to dedicate to the city for road purposes a 60-foot wide right-of-way which shall be subject to the determination of the City of Renton but such, right-of-way shall be in or close to an alignment with a southerly extension of Edmonds Avenue N.E. 8. In order to buffer the residential uses west of the site and generally screen the cemetery use, a 50-foot landscape buffer shall be maintained along the north and west property lines. A bond in the amount of 50 cents per square foot should be posted to assure that the condition is complied with by the applicant. SP-047-80 Page Four 9. The slope stability may be accomplished by a combination of methods subject to the approval of the Planning and Public Works Departments. Hydroseeding efforts and a bond to assure rehabilitation are calculated to cost four cents per square foot and a bond in this amount shall be posted. 10. The permit is issued solely for the purpose of bringing fill to the site from outside sources and no on-site removal or redistribution of material is permitted under this permit. 11 . The temporary access road which has been constructed at the northwest corner of the site is to be closed and adequate safety provisions made at this location. 12. The applicant will have to submit sufficient data to allow the estimation of the number of vehicle trips, and this data may be used by the Public Works Department to determine what additional traffic control measures may need to be instituted subject to further review by the Hearing Examiner. DECISION: The special permit to fill and grade the subject site is approved for a period not to exceed three years subject to the following conditions: 1 . The applicant will apply for a renewal of the special permit six months prior to the expiration of this special permit if additional time is r.equired. No annual license shall be issued without prior special permit approval and without prior satisfaction of all conditions enumerated below. 2. The posting of a bond in an amount sufficient to cover the costs of both landscaping the 50-foot buffers and rehabilitation and hydroseeding the subject site. The costs of such operations are 50 cents per square foot and four cents per square foot, respectively. 3. The hours of operation shall be limited to Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. 4. No access by trucks shall be permitted via Blaine Avenue N.E. Both the primary cemetery access and the supplementary access on the northwest corner of the subject property shall be closed as determined by the Planning and Public Works Departments and provision made to provide safe closures of both roadways. 5. A cash bond in the amount of $2,000 shall be posted with the city to permit the city crews to keep the city streets clear of debris generated by the subject fill operation. 6. The dedication of a 60-foot wide right-of-way to the city for the southerly extension of Edmonds Avenue N.E. 7. The provision and maintenance of a 50-foot landscape buffer along' the northern and western property lines of the subject site. 8. All fill material shall consist of natural materials such as earth, rock and gravel . 9. Submission of information containing an estimate of the amount of fill material involved in the operation per city requirements, such information shall be subject to review of the Public Works Department and shall be used to determine what additional traffic control measures are necessary subject to further review of the Hearing Examiner. ORDERED THIS 13th day of.March, 1981 . 7N—AlY.14 Fred J. K fmann'"� Land Use ring Examiner . TRANSMITTED THIS 13th day of March, 1981 by Affidavit of Mailing to the parties of record: • Ted Gathe, Attorney at Law, 4111 E. Madison, Seattle, WA 98112 James Colt, P.O. Box 547, Renton, WA 98057 SP-u4j-80 Page Five TRANSMITTED THIS 13th day of March, 1981 to the following: Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Richard Houghton, Acting Public Works Director David Clemens, Acting Planning Director Michael Porter, Planning Commission Chairman Barbara Schellert, Planning Commissioner Ron Nelson, Building Official Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before March 27, 1981 . Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk accompanying a filing fee of $25.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall , or same may be purchased at cost in said department. 12- 1 ' RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEWW SHEET Appli cation: &-g Acp if, p (Rif tri GAR,eles e1 • IFIett-Ve -Wile • ' . . Location : orlh• st66ex ti 4 4/deem*1e f ' Sd T,7 �7.' 1 n%/ I Applicant : ` .� ��®���®n� ��+ TO: Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : . ; ; . , E Police Department A. R, C, MEETING DATE : 401/4; Public Works Department E.Re 1e i• 142410 Engineering Division Traffic Engineering Building Division �-i" l lities Engineering m Fire Department • (Other) : • COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRIT IN FORJT E APPLICATION REVIEW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON 6W4" AT 0 : 00 A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM. IF YOU DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE TO A TEND THE ARC PLEASE _PROVIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 0u P .M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : • • Approved „'' Approved with Conditions — Not Approved /1:)`�.��.5_ / -i-)/�:� I L .(.-%-"6 -(- -, 1i� ,'-// c:'L. �" S S,i;/7CL IS', �.r - ,•iC.. (rC --Th - / t ,•.?• j' L.`-,-r/ // L. ', C /;. - -J� �� G / t L , _~` _ • '' __.- X-- - 7-- / . / „ Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date ( I REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : v<<<-i `( Approved ✓ Approved with Conditions Not Approved .-t$ot:c r � c-is. oz.'• 5 APilec o, o 46-rot- kAi' - 002 11---- ("//L) 1.4/` r i a n n • 12-19 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application : _ i" �� sr `" 1� � � ibr� Eh ikatre le • Location : 4 0 c a • • • • Applicant : • ADO� ges.• 4,. TO: Parks Department • SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : Police Department A.R.C.. MEETING DATE: - /* ig Public Works . Department et •1 Engineering Division Traffic Engineering Building Division - Utilities Engineering Fire Department • (Other) • COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRIT A, FORTE APPLICATION REVIEW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON AT 9: O A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM. IF YOU DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE TO ATTEND THE ARC, PLEASE PROV DE HE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :00 P .M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Tr A C g4,40 0. raa Q,V. Approved X Approved with Conditions Not Approved AG4E0 16/4 fI f G. fle.aA/ i /0- z - Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved /\Approved with Conditions Not Approved E-4/6 . //hi / l.- l 'LI '^•1/ , . • • I .,/, Signature- of Director or Authorized Representative VDate " ' ' if°1W8 0 Planni 12-197 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION] REVIEW SHEET Application: &Qi4 / Mir , ` i It fi ° ;10 e le PN tVe ..Site ma • Location : • • • s ®O®ikAQti3® 4® • Appl i cant: mi. alge eri-Ce. ..4ecy ram. e) TO: Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : ,*+ ,',- ,.y . i Police Department A. R.C. MEETING DATE: ' melo/J5 •. Public W �• Aarlie orks Department elite, ee ‘'Engineering Division Traffic Engineering Building Division Utilities Engineering • Fire Department (Other) . COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITTN FORTE APPLICATION REV EW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON AT 9:09 A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM. IF YOU DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE T A TEND THE ARC, PLEASE PROVIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5:Ou P .M. ON REVIEWING DEPA"TMENT/DIVISION : K' Approved g Approved with Conditions - Not Approved A ,.,-ru' Ge m �J �,-�,.-Po ' �� -�-�? Ste"" o G �`J /' ( ._ 5"i2e.--....-,-..„... .... , L.4,, --- or Auth rized Re re ntative Date Sigr_pture of Director REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : POLICE Approved XX Approved with Conditions Not Approved 1) Comply With 'conditions of previous permit . 2) Trim back trees so that sight distance is provided at the intersection of N.E . 3rd & the entrance road. ., 3) Knock down little knoll of earth that is just east of entrance road to reduce sight obstruction. 4) Agree to participate in the widening of N.E . 3rd to make safer acess c ; ,. — + ,pro of Ili rector or Authorized Representative Date FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE Application No (s) : SP-047-80 Environmental Checklist No: ECF-567-80 Description of Proposal: Application for Special Permit to fill and grade 11 -acre expansion area Proponent : Mt. Olivet Cemetery, Co. Location of Proposal: North and east of existing Mt. Olivet • Cemetery, east of N.E. 3rd Street in the vicinity of 100 Blaine Avenue N.E. Lead Agency: Planning Department This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on January 21 , 1981 , following. a presentation by Roger J. Blaylock of the Planning Department. Incorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings of the ERC on application ECF-567-80 •are the following : 1 ) Environmental Checklist Review Sheet, prepared by: Roger J. Blaylock, Associate Planner DATED: January 19 , 1981 2) Applications : SP-047-80 Acting as the Responsible Official, the ERC has determined this development does not have significant adverse impact on the environment. An EIS is not required under RCW 43 . 21C. 030 (2) (c) . This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a complete environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Reasons for declaration of environmental non-significance: 1 . Proposal is in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan and existing zoning. 2 . Hours of operation to be limited to 9 a.m. to 3 p.m. 3 . Applicant will submit detailed re-planting plan to Building and Planning Departments for approval. Signatures : (71///2 -C. G�'�. r/ff'(, /iRon Nelson, Building Director vid R. Clemens , Acting / Planning Director `2‹.10,4,42 R2chard C. Houghton , cting Public Works Director DATE OF PUBLICATION : January 25 , 1981 EXPIRATION OF APPEAL PERIOD: February 8 , 1981 PLANNING DEAARTMENT PRELIMINARY INARY !;I:i ltRT TO THIS i:lr�'\P i NG EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING March 3 , 1981 APPLICANT: MT. OLIVET CEMETERY CO. , INC. FILE NO: SP-047-80 A. SUMMARY & ]PURPOSE OF REQUEST: The applicant seeks Special Permit approval for fill and grade of the +11 acre sute, B. GENERAL L Iff1 rmA\T]CON: 1 . Owner of Record: American Memorial Services, Inc. 2. Applicant: Mt. Olivet Cemetery, Inc. 3. Location: (Vicinity Map Attached) Property located north and east of the existing platted cemetery, east of N.E. 3rd St. , in the vicinity of 100 Blaine Avenue N.E. and the powerline right-of-way. 4. Legal Description: A detailed legal , description is available on file in the Renton Planning Department. 5. Size of Property: +11 acres 6. Access : Via Blaine Avenue N.E. 7. Existing Zoning: GS-1 , General Classifi- cation District; Minimum lot size 35, 00 square feet. 8. Existing Zoning in the Area : GS-1 , S-1 , R-4 , R-3, R-2, R-1 9. Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Public/Quasi-Public 10. Notification: The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date. Notice was properly published in the Daily Record Chronicle on February 15, 1981 , and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City Ordinance on February 20, 1981 . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: Mt. Olivet Cemetery SP-047-80 MARCH 3, 1981 PAGE TWO C. 1:IST D,lri l:;ACKGROUNII➢ : The platted portion of the cemetery property has been in existence for many years. The area of the subject application was previously used as a surface mining operation. The area immediately south of the cemetery property, owned by Stoneway Concrete, was recently re- zoned to various multi-family densities subject to pro- viding access along the east side of the subject site ,to N.E. Third Street. A Special Permit for fill and grade was approved by the Hearing Examiner on March 25, 1977 , for the site. 1 . Topography: The site is quite irregular in topography with latge depressions as much as 30 feet below the existing level of the platted portion of the cemetery. 2. Soils : Everett gravelly sandy loam, 5-15% slopes (ErC) . Runoff is slow to medium and the erosion hazard is slight to moderate. This soil is used for timber and pasture and for urban development. A gravel pit covers much of the easterly portion of the property. 3. Vegetation: Very little vegetation exists on the site.; That which does consists of scrub grass and some blackberries. 4 . Wildlife: The subject site provides very minimal habitat suitable for wildlife. 5. Water : Some surface water was observed on the . subject site (February 20, 1981 ) . 6. Land Use: The subject site is an abandoned surface mining operation. The existing platted portion of Mt. Olivet Cemetery is located directly adjacent on the south and west of the subject site. The power line right-of-way borders the site on the east with the existing Edwards pit operation located further eastward. The area north of the site is steeply wooded and undeveloped to N.E Third Street. Four existing single family residences are situated west of the subject site along Blaine Avenue N.E. Monterey Terrace single family residential community is located farther to the west, across Blaine Avenue N.E. , E. NEIGfl1WmCOD t 1:t m ,>A( ']I1E1IIS'l'Z(CS: The area consists of primarily existing and abandoned surface mining operations, together with the cemetery use and some single family residential uses. F. f',w L IC SERVICES: : 1 . Water and Sewer: A 16 inch water main, an 8 inch sanitary sewer main, and a 15 inch storm sewer main are located along N.E. Third Street. 2. Fire Protection: Provided by the City of Renton as per ordinance requirements. 3. Transit: n/a 4. Schools : n/a 5. Recreation: n/a PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: Mt, Olivet Cemetery SP-047-80 MARCH 3, 1981 PAGE THREE G. APPLIIC'\v. S TL*mS OF THE ZONING CODE 1 . Section 4-722B; Special Permits 2. Section 4-729; "G" General Classification District 3. Chapter 23, Mining, Excavation, and Grading Ordinance H. AP'LIICABLE .SEC IONS OF THE COmm' aurANSI'VE PLAN 0;., OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT: 1 . Land Use Report, 1965, Objectives, pages 17 and 18. I. IMPACT ON 'ram NATURAL OR vt i va,\ E J/IIROI T: • 1 . Natural Systems : Filling of the site will reclaim the existing pit area to a new use. Impacts may occur during the filling process. However, these can be mitigated through proper controls and ordinance standards. 2. Population/Employment : Minor _ 3. Schools: n/a 4 . Social: n/a 5. Traffic: Minor J. ENVIP,4111NENTAL SEySS T/T f �•S 1:�(OW DETERMINATION: Pursuant to the City of Renton 's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, as amended, RCW 43-21C, a declaration of non-significance was issued for the proposal by the ERC on January 25, 1981 . K. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED: 1 . City of Renton Building Division. 2. City of Renton Engineering Division. 3. City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division. 4 . City of Renton Utilities Division. 5. City of Renton Fire Department. • L. PIING DEP" ',TMENT f,;i�ALYSIS• 1 . The applicant is requesting a special permit to fill and grade an abandoned surface mining area to provide for future expansion of an area for cemetery purposes. The present G zoning of the site would not allow an outright use as a cemetery and will require approval of a conditional use permit for the use of the fill site for cemetery purposes , 2. The applicant had obtained a special permit to do the necessary filling operation in 1977 under File No. SP-039-77 The proposal is identical with that presented in 1977 and use many of the existing plans with some modifications of specific drainage plans. 3. The proposed fill and grade will reclaim the. previous surface mining pit areas located to the east and north of the existing cemetery and raise the grades to match the level of the existing cemetery. The intent appears to be to change the access and orientation of the cemetery from the west to the east along a proposed roadway which will access the proposed ERADCO condominium complex. PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: MT. OLIVET CEMETERY SP-047-80 MARCH 30 1981 PAGE FOUR l 4. Along the eastern portion of the property the grade will be raised equal to that of the cemetery and the powerline easement area or approximately 20-35 feet above the existing bottom of the pit. This area is proposed as the first phase and is to be graded, hydroseeded and otherwise rehabilitated prior to the commencing of the fill of the remaining portion of the property on the north, side of the cemetery. The northerly area is proposed to be filled and graded to slope northward from the elevation of the existing cemetery (approximately 285 ° ) down to approximately the 250 foot elevation line. The top and slope of the existing hillside area at the northerly edge of the site and the trees within that area are to remain undisturbed. This will account for a 50 foot buffer along the northerly edge of the site. Also, the area along the westerly edge of the site adjacent to the single family residences is to remain undisturbed. This was required in the original special permit in 1977 and a 50 foot setback was required at that time. 5. The applicant anticipates that the operation will take an additional three years to complete. The original special permit has expired but the annual grading license has been continued as a result of the applicant's efforts to submit a new request for special permit to the Hearing Examiner. Th'e Building Department has taken the official position of not placing a stop work order on the site until the Hearing Examiner has reached a decision. 6. Access to the site has been modified since the original special permit was issued in 1977. The Stoneway Company has constructed an access roadway for the ERADCO property which, when completed, will go along the eastern boundary of the subject site. This will provide ample access for the cemetery to conduct their fill operation. This access road is also being used by M.A. Segale in mining the Rainier Sand & Gravel Company pit located to the east. No access is anticipated over Blaine Avenue N.E. and should be specifically restricted. 7. Mt. Olivet Cemetery has provided a 60 foot private easement to ERADCO for accessing their development site to the south of Mt. Olivet Cemetery. The City has recently recommended to the Hearing Examiner on the Rainier Sand & Gravel special permit application that a new alignment for Edmonds Avenue N.E. be obtained from M.A. Segale Inc. to line up with that presently dedicated to the City on the north side of N.E. 3rd Street. This 60 feet provided across Mt. Olivet Cemetery property to the ERADCO development would be the logical extension of Edmonds Avenue N.E. and should be required as a dedi- cation to address the traffic situation in a comprehensive manner. 8. The applicant' s proposed operation contract is generally compatible with the ordinance requirements. Drainage plans submitted to the Public Works Department in May of 1977 do not address temporary sedimentation and drainage systems during construction. It is critical that sedimentation be controlled from the site so that it does not interfere with the water supply system of Mt. Olivet Cemtery. Storm water control was one of the primary issues in reviewing the Rainier Sand & Gravel site in relationship to Mt. Olivet Cemetery' s present operation and it is only reasonable that Mt. Olivet not disturb their own water supply from their fill operation. PLANNING DEPAl.i_fNT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: MT. OLIVET CEMETERY, SP-047-80 MARCH 3, 1981 PAGE FIVE 9. The hours of operation should be identical to those placed on the operation of Rainier Sand & Gravel Inc. which has been recommended by the Traffic Engineering Division to be from 8: 00 a.m. to 3 : 30 p.m. 10. Based upon the description of work methods and rehabili- tation Exhibit Al submitted by the applicant, the Planning Department has no concerns except over the type of material used for fill. The site should not become a sanitary landfill or consist of materials such as car bodies, refrigerators, stoves or other bulk items and plastics. Plastics are a non-degradable material and will remain on the site forever causing unusual ground water patterns. M. DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDTI : The Planning Department recommendation is almost identical with the recommendation submitted to the Hearing Examiner on April 12, 1977 for the original request. It is recommended by the Department that the Hearing Examiner approve the special permit for fill and grade, File No. SP-047-80 subject to the following conditions : 1 . Said permit shall be valid for a three-year period from the date of approval subject to annual review and license requirements of Mining Excavation and Grading Ordinance. 2. Said permit shall not include the removal of existing natural material from the site. 3. Requires conditional use permit for expansion of cemetery use. 4. Interim--drainage plans for filling operation shall be submitted to and approved by the Public Works Department. 5. All slopes and finished surfaces shall be hydroseeded as per Planning Department approval and ordinance requirements. Suitable bonding as per ordinance requirements shall be required to assure site rehabilitation. Bonding istsuggested to be 4 cents per square foot. 6. Sanitary land fill or fill material consisting of plastics, car bodies, refrigerators, stoves, or other similar bulk items shall not be permitted on the subject site. 7. The applicant shall provide inspection per ordinance requirements by a qualified licensed engineer. Said engineer shall submit written status reports to the City semi-annually or by specific request of the Building Official. The first report shall be due June 1, 1981. 8. A minimum 50 foot setback shall be staked and maintained along the west and north property lines. All existing vegetation shall be retained in its natural statewithin said setback areas. Additional landscaping and screening may be required by the Planning Department. No existing trees shall be cut or removed without prior approval of the Planning Department. Bond should be required at 50 cents per square foot to assure compliance. r PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: MT. OLIVET CEMETERY, SP-047-80 MARCH 3, 1981 PAGE SIX 9. Access to the site shall be provided by the existing road extending from N.E. 3rd Street along the eastern boundary of the subject site. The existing Blaine Avenue N.E. shall not be utilized for access related to the subject fill and grade operation. 10. The 60 foot easement granted to ERADCO by Mt. Olivet Cemetery for the purpose of road construction shall be dedicated to the City of Renton for public street purposes. 11 . All work done shall be between the hours of 8: 00 a.m. and 3 : 30 p.m. weekdays only. 12. Suitable controls of dust and mud shall be provided per ordinance requirements. 13. A minimum six foot fence and gate shall be constructed and maintained across the partially completed access road at the northwest corner of the site and extend a sufficient distance north and south to ensure adequate safety and isolation of the project area from Blaine Avenue N.E. 14 . Additional traffic control measures may be necessary due to potential truck traffic. The Public Works Department may require such additional measures if it determines a need during the course of the subject operation. • • s ,.I 1 r* &4 ! c�xLra ' ',•e v� ,' ' �)`' a//li ,°jt tt/•� v • c _. I 18 Ir i' €. 1 I 1 pi\,.,_1, 1. -.r.--11' .: \i.,... ---,•—•-• EN4 1:... v .- , 41. .1 /. 1 1 PALIF C CAR ,` '1! t goy ' 1i. , • 41 FOUNDRY '10 ;4's. 4 �t� ,y a, �Y. t , I 6 l . '� \ 4� 19 t ' �` ti .. II • •a 11 „/ r � I o I o zo Y O 7 ir ?' I . _e,,ii--., -- „, ,,,, Lil. ,, , , / / • ry 3 �+° Y/ -'r ram I IL. 0 [ . //.4, ' cf 11, 'A z''' er ',. t '',,, ,„.--,,,, ./ . ,........• ..... •....... . ..•„..,....•..•..,........•coo Cs••••,....nli; ! a` a ;*, ,t F �„ •� ,�/ .,,. Y � r A V * I , . %.,` , , ��l // s"'s'! # a•� `_.,..,. F III ' Jile//�T/ i p 3 !(Mt re 1., .I 1 / f •m•'17 1.ENTON CITY L'IMITS.7.v•®.1 / r 6 } c.-----_,-.;„ 1,z\ ) ] . a 4k 13 , ' j I I SPECIAL PERMIT: MT. OLIVET CEMETERY\, CO.. , INC. ; Appl . SP-047-80--special permit to fill and grade in GS-1 zone; property located north and east of the existing $ platted cemetery, east of N.E. 3rd St . , in the vicinity of 100 Blaine Ave. N.E. between Blaine Ave . N.E. and the powerline right-of-way. -- . - --- APPLICANT Mt. Olivet Cemetery Co. , Inc. TOTAL AREA ±11. 3 acres s ' Blaine Ave . N.E. PRINCIPAL ACCESS EX! 5IINit ZONING GS-1 Residential Single Family 35 ,000 Sq.Ft. • Undeveloped r EXISTING USE rfr and grading operation; future reuse of site PROPOSED USE for expansion of cemetery area. i COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Public/Quasi-Public COMMENTS_ .. -32=16aia.L• .66g=d6O/oS•..'3T;1.60=SSiR.^..RC.61/t 'YR tOrri"""•�""""`ootarlC'Sffi&PAS'^.SZYXi=fS12====iTt^==::. a11..,Y6".SLS4➢'V13OGL9(L3+`.CJ�116743 M_ ::'''''''''.:::..."..... • '.. —; Tea' ..e k .ax•i4 ;:u Yiu..M.-. n14rw .:y,,, 4M1r•.ka...r.rt. ....i ;;,•p„ . • aS c: q h�t C 9 . . .� 4dMAA., �4,, t, *.'i: .. '*' � ;kWrt1Y♦' " ,f '' � 1 J yj1 1 ,7 Av. . .• , ‘,.. 4. 1‘,... ,•• ,'., ..,. „..,,...,•!..!1.4,,,rt,4),.ifi:. :.., • u Tit r '" tk r `;} t ® +c. • y ®sEe r4 kct SEeo r'1,. �'k' � 'r,' Q 0 :.:- .,!'-''.'' . '. ow '4', DM. : ... . :., ... • . . ...... ...;"•:it:':'1044'.';',•'•(•:,...%)?: . , I,0 or. 0 1 /rig X ' 13 . . ..•. a / . . . . iu in A‘,.... •: ,.. 1 . . 0 . .. -. .., .- El i - .- - - II- - Z. , •..,1,:i.:.:,. • ,.. _ 11 11 1 .(.. } 11 i 1 1...1 0 ...rr i, o { �, aaa•^at.,rasa an*u;fie.15. a.'.4*., a1:Ar*MU. ,nrA.0W., IMO �e, w11,,,4x, .,:w.0Yry ..:X^GX:.r:ot•... -•.�' Y•Y'4A;a4 -.1$1, '*:r;;'..I:-y''_ Y 1 �Q .R a sr :; : ; 1® eliVr) C AVEY. CO. s. 1.t3�g t, 11 ',. ' to3 Ina_ • 540 f''40-oe . Mt Olivet Cemetery SP-047-80 f#!IN4 ,i Planning �'� 12-1979 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application � � or . . ire ,Se e m Location : 4 a era, e` a; Applicant : � �� � ®®6 r r Age0 elf® . M TO: Parks Department ' y SCHEDULED HEARING DATE a ��; F .' Police Department A.R.C. MEETING DATE : i'llicf"0 Public Works Department t e ®° °s .f._,,,,, ,,,-*Ir4p Engineering�'� Division g/ Traffi c Engineering Building Division Utilities Engineering Fire Department (Other) : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRIT N FORTE APPLICATION REV EW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON /0 r v AT 9:UU A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM. IF YOU DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE T ATTEND THE ARC, PLEASE PROV DE- THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY IQ P .M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : ` g C iiio‘PN Oe/ ti- OW. Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved kvE &W ove. 1 TAv cie HAVC. govre Qjq Acme A f � QV60 $/ /,V . t Li.. . /0 c t 6. 'Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : `r - -� Approved )(Approved with Conditions Not Approved /Ajf/q--,--c. -1/ 0 "-) ,-,-/-3 v_ C_ i UR_ C--:--/V6—_>, Mcici- - _ �/'.%'DU / Jam_�� ,)Z_ ,C=.(f e-/L .3/0 �� C` F -C=(jZ-,c1D/,t' (- ` ), 4 '/J /..,, (— xt e /6 , ( --_ aSignatur of Director or Authorized Representative Date ;/<2 • /IP/4je , Plannin 12-1979 t RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET 9 Application : v /FA eltP`e Akie 0 Location : - 9 vel a • • • . 41 a Applicant: i� �� ®fi b. � oo�. �+,. TO. Parks Department k SCHEDULED HEARING DATE , / .1 , s, i Police Department A .C. r•-, R,C, MEETING DATE . � ��F.�k , : Public Works Department ° . @eo ®@ ®® ® �, � iz 4 Engineering Division Traffic Engineering Building Division AP tili'ties Engineering «_ Fire Department (Other) : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRIT N FOR T E APPLICATION REVIEW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON les, 4i. AT 9 : 00 A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM IF YOU DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE TO ATTEND THE ARC, PLEASE PROV DE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P ,M, ON 1 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved f/' Approved with Conditions Not Approved ("C: SS 'a/)JS /—/c`' C`/1,'C/(C 1/L.-C--( f/z�/7//c_'(G S LS'%/(-C, /JL' 'ca /r - ,%,ci GtJ/0 ii7- - ( //`i/ VZ;7t// '//L. C`- _C///',/a/I/CZ. -. e/ /„Z "r_ /'/ti C// - /tL /mil //)1c 4/(4`c� iC C �L(/ /C.G- c= C ' f - .,-d(-r-e-- 0-.)-1._ ,---- ./. /..,9 /712c:i Signature of Director or Authorizz ' Representative Date l REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : t/(ccr-r`t Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved 5,€ a%c-- c'v 5'{S Oer• f...6 5 r L. // I 1 /?11��r l , () Signatu - of Director or Authorized Representative Date -_ � Planning ' " 12-1979 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application : e' M�� iiinatve 4' o- Location : a ° ° `° • ° • Applicant : ®�®_ �itge �® 0i TO: Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : iji % ., 0 Police Department A. R.C. MEETING DATE : ell: l_ Public Works Department o �a ©Q ©® /44 "-If+%? j ., 1,11 Engineering Division Traffic Engineering Building Division Utilities Engineering Fire Department (Other) : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRIT N FOR,T E APPLICATION REVIEW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON AT 9; U A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM. IF YOU' DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE Tip ATTEND THE ARC, PLEASE PROV DE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON • REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved >( Approved with Conditions -VA Not Approved cam- Gam- -' ---- /%/ate Signature of Director or Auth ized Repre ntative Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : POLICE Approved XX Approved with Conditions Not Approved 1) Comply with conditions of previous permit . 2) Trim back trees so that sight distance is provided at the intersection of N.E. 3rd & the entrance road. 3) Knock down little knoll of earth that is just east of entrance road to reduce sight obstruction. 4) Agree to participate in the widening of N.E. 3rd to make safer acess . Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Lt . D.R. Persson 10/17/80 r �1 _ Ill _ _ . I . 4 ti FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE Application No (s) : SP-047-80 Environmental Checklist No: ECF-567-80 Description of Proposal: Application for Special Permit to fill and grade 11 -acre expansion area Proponent: Mt. Olivet Cemetery, Co. Location of Proposal: North and east of existing Mt. Olivet Cemetery, east of N.E. 3rd Street in the vicinity of 100 Blaine Avenue N.E. Lead Agency: Planning Department - This proposal was 'eviewed by the ERC on January 21 , 1981 , following a presentation by Roger J. Blaylock of the Planning Department. Incorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings of the ERC on application ECF-567-80 are the following: 1 ) Environmental Checklist Review Sheet, prepared by: Roger J. Blaylock, Associate Planner DATED: January 19 , 1981 2) Applications : ' SP-047-80 Acting as the Responsible Official, the ERC has determined this development does not have significant adverse impact on the environment. An EIS is not required under RCW 43. 21C. 030 (2) (c) . This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a complete environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Reasons for declaration of environmental non-significance: 1 . Proposal is in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan and existing zoning. 2. Hours of operation to be limited to 9 a.m. to 3 p.m. 3 . Applicant will submit detailed re-planting plan to Building and Planning Departments for approval. Signatures : 2 // (1/7 • Z 7 on Nelson, Building Director Avid R. Clemens , Acting Planning Director R c and C. Houg ton, sting Public Works Director DATE OF PUBLICATION: January 25 , 1981 EXPIRATION OF APPEAL PERIOD: February 8 , 1981 V .. " '''Z'''• .'1.'; ‘g eli'- .4,-,''0,.•P,A,1 -, ,..,). ..'' •.,,,i...'`-;;,, -..y.e, •l• --, , ,,,, „ —• -4. ::'.1', if,„7,•:'' V1,4 744 .44"s',•1;'•4 s-5-.,• ,:f.,Al• 1,4 s,,,s• ' 1 ,,,'.1, ,,tna •;,A ir' W37 ,VIVI'l • is;',Vis'; `44;••-,.. 15,t, ',lea it.:s, '"44, 4;•,, s,T,...„. It*, '7,. - g.1.' "1.:.4 ,e..,.::!• ,.'4,4. . ;, . . ";;; ;';;44 "Y• ,T....Z --• ,s4p.P- . ._ , ,.... _. ... ; ,;i..,4 ''''*,!.',", .,,, .:,;, ,,,. ,-,..,'4,,, F.4.2;1',,' ,,,:;,4,,,,, , ,s% ‘4.4 ! :I ,;,, -5,,I.f \•.•,141,,f,,,,,,,-,,, 10•,,;.:— 1;1,-;t• • •;1'..: i'.3.t.2;,•:- .. .1- ' •;.'s'-'•'•;,,4 41 As ,-t,is -4;1 -' •?•tss, ss ..4.,,,%,, ,,.• 5,.•,, .n?. ,,i,„ k ,?..-. ',4••; •,,4,,,;,, ,, 'P; ';t;•;‘''...,,-- :t#,' „.. ily ., „,... .. ,,, . , ,,. ' ':;:''-"o, °, . 1! ''''-:• ‘•,- '' 4.?:..'•, ' le.,..„,,, , ,,,i,? ,o; v_! ,. ,,, ...,,k i,... ;,:,. : :''.::'''',, 'f',.'''' ..' .,',''''. ''',..'*,! _;,.:, ,, ;,,,;I n',-,? ,, . ...,‘, :..'"4 s..,#•':,,,-, ., 1.a •s;:•.*-. 4.4. ,s.•1;;;;•''s' •;,;,is: sl:'''"ii, 4;l''', n• ;.,•4.4:• 4•4•14;'. ! • GENERAL LOC,-kTION: AND, ;Co',' AD*RESS: PROPERTY LOCATED NORTH AND EAST OF EXISTING MT. OLIVET CEMETERY, EAST OF N.E. 3RD STREET IN THE VICINITY or' 100 8LAINE AVENUE N.E. r • \ 1 , LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON FILE IN THE RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT • i . , I .1 • • i . • I S POSTED TO liWTIFY 13 ,017PERTY Ir.-..4.,,NRS OF 1 V•2`:*i',..',,, 0, • i +: •.0 l';.• :4.% 'i'.A:i•. , ,, . ,,,,, „, - , ;sp,, . . '';';,'. ':,;.' '"'::,,,;•111. ' ; F'., "'"' -''''. •, ;i T.,AN, allo,Li. .•'?i,v I ,.,.", ,,,,, ,-4i.. f f,FINF,:' '4'.,', 'r ;,.... ,. '. ';`,?:. I'121 Tf.:4'!... :1 ;;.'''','.:';:` A 11;,, s,-, ,..' .:•.'-A-;.!..A t., ...- . ., ,0 '" A ' All ,..., 4, ,:,. ,• 1' — - ;,,,. y 0-* _.. -A•', . , sit ri :•t:s.„ .— ,- —-'''••s..4 4 •,,fs 1, -. -?,,,•.;,;_•'''. ' : s.st s ,44.;•,,, ; ;',.' ;;; s s,s.„ 4 -'-!•• ',:;'s -•s,sl• . ,s .4,4 so. ,65 •40,,ss ,,% ':5.? s...4. •.4, TO BE HELD . IN CITY COUNCIL CHAMERS, j‘i.UNICIP4k,L BUILDFIA . i? 0:-: MARCH 3, 1981 ';',EGINN1%'G AT 9:00 A.M. P.M• lEN k:7'4i larEf'1; C .• 111• :.......e) --,.. ,a- ',. : 'r A. 4,!5-:,, 1F.'-' ':.. " , ., ..., , ,. , ,t,,, v,..,,,,L,,, —SPECIAL PERMIT TO FILL 4. ,..._ 9,, .A Sirr:' ,;%, ' ';• u•s '.1.1' 't,4 r! tv AND GRADE 11—ACRE EXPANSION i-,,ii :,,,, ':' ,'''; , 4.,•,, AREA ,. ..,.., --..%,,,,, .,.. ...:, .4. ,3, .'• i 111. ' - ',.' .;# ' Vi ..- f,ir.111 ' ie: "' ; . !,Ai; ••• ",' i',1,. 4,4 ,'-''''' •4$ '4; s,„,•.s..4.1 ..cir • . . . .,...- 1 • -4.4,„ ;st- .;,..t,.4, -.4. ,s„„ s.• -ry li, 'Aiii; ::.' . 0:t pi..i'.1::::7 ' e i, 4 f, ' A% 4.',' 1;i,l.'• :*.;,-•'' "''t l'.'t :,',1''. .,,t;:li , •' , , ., 4., 4.4 4,, . , .. FINAL DECLARATION OF NON—SIGNIFICANCE: 1 . • EXPIRATION OF AREEAL PERI D: FRB RUA RV R : 1 Q R 1 1 ,-, 1 . , • . FOR FURTHER INFORIVIATI(I't CALL 235 2550 . ..• . THIS NOTICE NOT TO 4.,E ;)41.AfAt WI'l'NOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION , . . . NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON MARCH 3 , 1981 , AT 9 : 00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITION: MT. OLIVET CEMETERY COMPANY Application for special permit to fill and grade 11-acre expansion area, file SP-047-80; property located north and east of existing Mt. Olivet Cemetery, east of N. E. 3rd Street in the vicinity of 100 Blaine Avenue N.E. Legal descriptions of file noted above are on file in the Renton Planning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITION ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON MARCH 3, 1981 , AT 9 : 00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. PUBLISHED: February 15 , 1981 DAVID R. CLEMENS ACTING PLANNING DIRECTOR CERTIFICATION I, STEVE MUNSON, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public , in and for the State of Washington residing in King County>22, , on the 13th day of February. > SIGNED: 7WAV, FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE Application No (s) : SP-047-80 Environmental Checklist No: ECF-567-80 Description of Proposal: Application for Special Permit to fill and grade 11-acre expansion area Proponent : Mt. Olivet Cemetery, Co. Location of Proposal: North and east of existing Mt. Olivet Cemetery, east of N.E. 3rd Street in the vicinity of 100 Blaine Avenue N.E. Lead Agency: Planning Department This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on January 21 , 1981 , following a presentation by Roger J. Blaylock of the Planning Department. Incorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings of the ERC on application ECF-567-80 are the following: 1 ) Environmental Checklist Review Sheet, prepared by: Roger J. Blaylock, Associate Planner DATED: January 19, 1981 2) Applications : SP-047-80 Acting as the Responsible Official, the ERC has determined this development does not have significant adverse impact on the environment. An EIS is not required under RCW 43. 21C. 030 (2) (c) . This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a complete environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Reasons for declaration of environmental non-significance: 1 . Proposal is in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan and existing zoning. 2. Hours of operation to be limited to 9 a.m. to 3 p.m. 3 . Applicant will submit detailed re-planting plan to Building and Planning Departments for approval. Signatures : 7, 7 / on Nelson, Building Director vid R. C emens , Acting Planning Director R hard C. Houghton, cting Public Works Director DATE OF PUBLICATION: January 25 , 1981 EXPIRATION OF APPEAL PERIOD: February 8 , 1981 1 Public Notice Public Notice NOTICE OF for the followsproject: ENVIRONMENTAL 1. NORTHWEST COM- • DETERMINATION MERCIAL REAL ESTATE ENVIRONMENTAL COMPANY(AUSTIN COM-• REVIEW COMMITTEE PANY(ECF-602-80) RENTON,WASHINGTON Application for site ap- The Environmental Re prowl for four two-story of- view Committee(ERC) hat flee building complexes,file issued a final declaration o SA692-80;property located non-significance for the fol• on the southwest corner of lowing projects: S.W. Und Ave. and S.W. 1.MT.OLIVET CEMETERN 16th St. CO.(ECF-587-80` Subject to the following Application for specie conditions for proposed de- permit to fill end grade 11• olaratlon of non-signifi- acre expansion area, filE canoe: SP-047-80:property locate( a)Teaffic impacts at S.W. north and east of existing Mt 16th St. and Lind Ave.S.W. Olivet Cemetery. east a signal. N.E.3rd St.In the vicinity a tr) Traffic capacity Im- 100 Blaine Ave.N.E. provements on S.W. Grady 2. PACIFIC NORTHWEST Way and Lind Ave. S.W. BELL(ECF-830-80) c)Pedestrian access from Application for Shoreline • S.W. Grady Way and Lind Management Subatantia' Ave. S.W. Development Permit, file d) Contribution to 1-405 SM-88-80,to install 18 root- bridge improvement. steel CD casing pipe withir e)Appropriate open drain- the Bronaon Way Bridge: age and wetland preserve- property located on the tion. Cedar River immediately f) Perimeter off-site im- west of City of Renton provements. Municipal Building. )Plans to mitigate recre- 3. RENTON VILLAGE atlnal impacts. VETERINARY SUPPLY Further information re- COMPANY(ECF-646-80) garding this action is avail- Application for rezone able in the Planning Depart- from GS-1 and R-4 to B-1 to ment, Municipal Building, permit parking for commer- Renton, Washington, 235- cial uses,file R-137-80;pro- 2550. Any appeal of ERC party located on east side of action must be tiled with tfte Talbot Road South,south of Hearing Examiner by Feb- FAI-405 and north of Puget ruary 8, 19e1. Drive South. Published in the Daily Re- 4, DURWOQD BLOOD cord Chronicle on January ° (ECF-001-81) 25, 1981. PC348 Application for rezone from R-1 to R-2 to permit future construction of ten townhouse cootominium units,file R-001-81;property located on the south side of N.E. 14th St. approximately 130 feet west of Edmonds Ave. N.E. 5.CITY OF RENTON(ECF- 001-81) Application for exemption from the Shoreline Manage- ment Substantial Develop- ment Permit, file SME-002- 82, to allow maintenance dredging of 1.2 miles of the Cedar River (75,000 cubic yards); property located from the mouth of the River to the Logan Street bridge. 8.WILLIAM TSAO AND CO. (POITRAS)(ECF-005-81) Application for site ap- proval to allow construction of a 12,000 square foot shopping center inciuding three stores,file SA-008-81; property located on the south side of N.E. 4th St. approximately 600 feet west of Union Avenue N.E. The Environmente:, Re- view Committee (ERC) has further issued a proposed declaration of significance • l ,,: wry `'� r :' $^k 7"1 to '` . `',, 4rc4 r'i' =�� -hf, t'trf, ;6','. e - x..y.. - i�i ,i.'YC__. ,t'_—.tA0,;:'a1TPA - - _ - .. _ fitr•' N • li #E4 A h • !, y r. ?3 f+, + 'C ci Y n" ;.,.e` A iig= ,tt ,w""y'k"r•"y >< il'' ,: 7',w'x» aa. ;' + w...f�'.rn 4� ♦t- '$, t, .., r ,w • �, irk r Y • flik75• .qSy-�, 3 a .. a3, :ii; 'qi�.�.y�. "� ', i t.:. ct F o. 1'- ' ... "`^ "3'? Y�. .4." r v.t;F' ..*• . 4. ' RD si BED ACTI N SPECIAL PERMIT -TO FILL AND CRA 11-ACRE EXPANSION AREA, file SP-047-80. - ' ELM' E.' AL L CATI IN N As':'E P Lq A te' :ESE .,PROPERTY LOCATED NORTH AND EAST OF EXISTING MT. OLIVET CEMETERY, EAST OF N.E. 3RD ST. IN THE VICINITY OF 100 BLAINE AVE. N0E, ,:.. R*w,.."t • kt....M z'NIA•. "`.' iaw- ' Cj a" uT+.e i%` 4 �f 1- ":..:.awa ACT m ` E CITY OF RENTO EIMVIRP itailtelEINFFAL REVIEW mmg r-rE E E E.R.C®3 • sata EDETE QED TM -1- ' 1P9 - giP P• SE,P ACTION E !, ^IP ' t !b . ,- . tom � ,AYE A EEG „ FOC • T ADVERSE 'MAW: .2. #.. ON E ENVI c•r:"`J. • • E ` E R*, ,MENTAL @ P • CT STATE El' 'To la t ILL A ` A READ IP F TEE A O JE 0 T€ ;` ' 1, T %I - -AV' E FILE P' WWIT! T-.,.. E RE .ITC ' -EARL __</LI E 'V o t•• P. ' ERRUAR , - - - - __ row FLI = 'HER- .1 1VJ. T6 `, C®IMTACT THE CITY F E i _..i:1�...,c p7 AWNING I o�G (E 37' : ... . Yb'�, .�.. „•�.. ,. �Yam .As`iBYW__gsrV���. yJ�®\ 4Y��•ptw�� .{`�'.� t' � w.ry� ..: ' �`5.. . 23 _2 D f„, .- - i � ,..F.'' _ ' • 2. , _u . BCD +a or RED'F , • ' MIRE $ OTIC ... , NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a final declaration of non-significance for the following projects : 1 . MT. OLIVET CEMETERY CO. (ECF-567-80) Application for special permit to fill and grade 11 -acre expansion area , file SP-047-80; property located north and east of existing Mt. Olivet Cemetery, east of N.E. 3rd St. in the vicinity of 100 Blaine Ave. N.E. 2 . PACIFIC NORTHWEST BELL (ECF-630-80) Application for Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit, file SM-86-80 , to install 18 inch steel OD casing pipe within the Bronson Way Bridge; property located on the Cedar River immediately west of City of Renton Municipal Building. 3 . RENTON VILLAGE VETERINARY SUPPLY COMPANY (ECF-646-80) Application for rezone from GS-1 and R-4 to B-1 to permit parking for commercial uses , file R-137-80 ; property located on east side of Talbot Road South, south of FAI-405 and north of Puget Drive South. 4 . DURWOOD BLOOD (ECF-001 -81 ) Application for rezone from R-1 to R-2 to permit future construction of ten townhouse condominium units , file R-001 -81 ; property located on the south side of N.E. 14th St. approximately 130 feet west of Edmonds Ave. N.E. 5 . CITY OF RENTON (ECF-002-81 ) Application for exemption from the Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit, file SME-002-81 , to allow maintenance dredging of 1 . 2 miles of the Cedar River (75 , 000 cubic yards) ; property located from the mouth of the River to the Logan Street bridge. 6 . WILLIAM TSAO AND CO. (POITRAS) (ECF-005-81 ) Application for site approval to allow construction of a 12 , 000 square foot shopping center including three stores , file SA-008-81 ; property located on the south side of N.E. 4th St. approximately 600 feet west of Union Avenue N.E. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has further issued a proposed declaration of significance for the following project : 1 . NORTHWEST COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE COMPANY (AUSTIN COMPANY (ECF-602-80) Application for site approval for four two-story office building complexes , file SA-092-80 ; property located on the southwest corner of S.W. Lind Ave. and S.W. 16th St. Subject to the following conditions for proposed declaration of non-significance : a) Traffic impacts at S.W. 16th St. and Lind Ave. S.W. signal. b) Traffic capacity improvements on S.W. Grady Way and Lind Ave. S.W. c) Pedestrian access from S.W. Grady Way and Lind Ave. S.W. - 2 - d) Contribution to I-405 bridge improvement. e) Appropriate open drainage and wetland preservation. f) Perimeter off-site improvements. g) Plans to mitigate recreational impacts. Further information regarding this action is available in the Planning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. Any appeal of ERC action must be filed with the Hearing Examiner by February 8 , 1981 . Published: January 25 , 1981 RE: The Declaration of Non-Significance for Application ; )G,-;\ No. R - 125 - 80 (Environmental Checklist No. ECF-634-80) 3W4 " The following items pertain to the conditions as listed on the above ''��'�%r mentioned declaration: Item 1 Coordinated Land Planning The owners of the parcels of land contiguous to this property on both to north and south have been working together in their planning efforts since mid-1979. They have been cognizant of the fact that good planning requires coordination and cooperation, not only by themselves, but with the City of Renton. They have retained Daryl Connell in this coordinated planning effort to work with the officials of the City of Renton. Even though there will be three separate applications due to the need for a subdiv- ision application on the P-1 site, the following agreements have formed the basis of their coordinated planning efforts: A. These owners have mutually agreed that the aesthetic appeal of their development will be enhanced by centralized planning. Each property owner, allowed- to act independently, could seriously affect the success or failure of their neighbor's efforts. The end result of this combined cooperation with the City of Renton has been a success. B. These owners have jointly agreed to construct a new road, as prescribed by the City of Renton, to mitigate the impacts of traffic generated by these three (3) parcels. C. In addition, they have mutually agreed to extend the required utilities, as prescribed by the City of Renton, to mitigate the impacts on public services and health associated with these developments. D. These owners have mututally agreed to preserve the exist- ing greenbelt along their common western boundary with S.R. 167, as prescribed by the City of Renton. E. These owners have mutually agreed to preserve the existing soils and topography of this area by designing structures that fit with the site and do not necessitate large earthwork activities. F. These owners have mutually agreed to construct a storm- water detention system to be used by all three owners. This system will be more efficient and more economical than three separate systems. Item 2 Traffic Impacts These owners have mutually agree to retain the services of a traffic consultant, Christopher Brown, P.E. , to study the traffic im- pacts of their proposed developments. The first draft of the traffic - 1 - report has been ✓iewed by the Traffic Engineer. Item 3 Recreational Needs Based on conversations with John Webly, Director of the Parks Department, we feel that the on-site recreational impact of this development can be mitigated. The off-site recreational needs, however, can only be mitigated through the efforts of the Parks . Department. We believe that continued population growth in this area will necessitate the development of a neighborhood park and we are therefor budgeting funds to be paid to the Parks .Department as our share of these costs Regarding the on-site recreational needs, we are planning the following improvements: 1. A recreation building of sufficient size to provide for a multi-purpose room, a jacuzzi and shower room, and some office space. 2. An adjourning outdoor recreation area of sufficient size to provide for a tennis court, a basket-ball area, a frisby area and a picnic table area. - 2 - MT. OLIVET CEMETERY COMPANY, INC. , BOX January 16, 1981 "j"L' " P.RNTON47 ____ . WA 98055 7 (208) 255-0323 r Mr. Roger Blaylock City of Renton, Planning Dept. 200 Mill Avenue, South Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Traffic and Access N.E.3rd Street and Edmonds Avenue Extention. Dear Mr. Blaylock: In November 1980, I met with yourself and Mr. Paul Lumbert of Traffic Engineering and the Building Department and arranged for signs based on their requests for the access road. • Subsequent to that date, I have examined the City's Review of the Segale-Edwards application with my attorney and am aware of the recommen- dations regarding widening 3rd N.E. and providing a caution light if re- quired. I attended a public hearing on December 23, 1980 at which these recommendations were reviewed and the City decided that the addition of approximately 100 more truck trips per day would not necessitate any fur- ther improvement to the access on N.E. 3rd Street. Since the City does not feel it necessary to have additional traffic control measures required of M. A. Segale for the additional traffic; I feel our traffic will not increase this need as we anticipate no more traffic than was present in the last 6-8 month period. If the City anticipates a problem, it should address that problem with appropriate inclusions in the permit for M. A. Segale, whose hearing will be January 20, 1981. We are not aware of the future traffic to be generated by the ERADCO Developement, but understand they have an application pending also. If traffic problems are anticipated from the Segale and ERADCO operations, we feel they should be solved at the time of their application and not be overlook d, only to be strictly applied to Mt. Olivet at a later date. Since ey 7 r James L. Colt President }M1 t. Olivet Cemetery Co. , Inc. LC:dkc • cc: T. Gathe SERVING KING COUNTY SINCE 1875 MT. OLIVES CEMETERY COMPANY, INC. ' tJ /1/ P.O. BOX 547 ',i RENTON, WA 980567 JkO " laal j (206) 255-0323 January 16, 1981 /,/ G Mr. Roger Blaylock City of Renton,Planning Dept. 200 Mill Avenue, So. Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Letter of January 14, 1981 Dear Mr. Blaylock: In referring back to your letter of October 29, 1980 and using your current letter of January 14th as a point of reference, I must agree that information requested regarding Item 1- Erosion Control was complied with in March of 1980 and I was assured that the information provided was suffi- cent. In respect to Item 2, I have enclosed another copy of our letter from Stoneway that was received by us on October 31, 1980 and hand delivered to the City of Renton Planning Department the following week. As you have in- formed previously, Stoneway holds the non-exclusive easement from Puget Power. With regard to Item 3, as you note in your letter of January 14th, discussions were held with the City in early November 1980 and police and traffic engineering divisions, including Paul Lumbert and yourself, also the Building Department, agreed on proper signage at the access road, which was installed. At the November meetings, it was agreed that the signs would aleviate any traffic problems from the City's standpoint. Mt. Olivet re- garded our compliance with your letter of October 29, 1980 as both cooper- A ative and complete. As all of the City requests had been met in November 1980, Mt. Olivet had expected notice of approval of our existing permit renewal or granting of a new permit in December or January. It came as quite a surprise to be informed of your letter of January 9, 1981, allowing us two days from re- ceipt to comply with conditions, which as you note in your letter of January 14th, had previously been met. 4 I _ SERVING KING COUNTY SINCE 1875 MT. OLIVET CEMETERY COMPANY, INC. • • , , ( i +r• `��° � P.O. BOX 547 4 r;: ; c_.i) RENTON, WA 9805S/ 1 ]61 ji (206) 255-0323 Page 2. �% r • January 16, 1981 iv/ Mr. Roger Blaylock ' C�pt1`;::' I am most concerned with your reference to our lack of "good faith" in the development of this area of Renton. As you are aware, we have cooperated with the City at every instance and most recently have been working with your Department, ERADCO and M. A. Segale to assure the or- derly and continued development of this area. I feel we have met -all of the City requirements and for clarification I have enclosed a separate letter addressing the traffic situation of N.E. 3rd Street. Sincere y' _ V James L. Colt President Mt. dlivet Cemetery Co. , Inc. JLC:dkc • cc: Mayor of Renton i T. Gathe a r , SERVING ICING • COUNTY SINCE 1875 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE JANUARY 21, 1981 AGENDA COMMENCING AT 10: 00 A.M. : THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM PENDING BUSINESS: JAMES BANKER (ECF-623-80, SP-111-80) MT. OLIVET CEMETERY COMPANY (ECF-567-80, SP-047-8.0) OLD BUSINESS: SP-047-80 --MT. OLIVET CEMETERY COMPANY -ECF=567=8-0 Application for special permit to fill and grade 11-acre expansion area; property located north and east of existing Mt. Olivet Cemetery, east of N.E. 3rd Street, in the vicinity of 100 Blaine Avenue N.E. NEW BUSINESS: R-125-80 DAVE BEST ECF-634-80 Application for rezone from G to R-3 to permit future construction of multiple family dwellings; property located on the west side of Talbot Road South approximately 1, 000 feet south of S.W. 43rd Street R-135-80 FRED BOWSER ECF-642-80 Application for rezone from G to R-2 to permit future construction of multiple family dwellings; property located on the west side of Talbot Road South approximately 1/4 mile south of S.W. 43rd Street R-001-81 DURWOOD E. BLOOD ECF-001-81 Application for rezone from R-1 to R-2 to permit future construction of ten townhouse condominium units; property located on the south side of N.E. 14th Street approximately 130 feet west of Edmonds Avenue N.E. R-137-80 RENTON VILLAGE VETERINARY SUPPLY COMPANY V-007-81 Applications for rezone from GS-1 and R-4 ECF-646-80 to B-1 to allow parking for commercial business and variance for reduction of required setback from 20 feet to 10 feet, relocation of required 5 foot landscaping requirement to portion of right-of-way of SR-515, and lease of 20-foot strip of SR-515 right-of-way for relocated 5-foot landscaping strip; property located on the east side of Talbot Road South, south of FAI-405 and north of Puget Drive South SME-110-80 CITY OF RENTON ECF-002-81 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Application for exemption from the Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit to allow maintenance dredging of sedimentary deposits from the bed of the Cedar River from the mouth of the Cedar River to the Logan Street Bridge (approximately 1. 2 miles) ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE JANUARY 21, 1981 PAGE TWO SP-451-79 BURLINGTON NORTHERN, INC. ECF-523-70 , Review of Declaration of Significance regarding application for special permit to fill approximately 24. 35 acres situated between Lind Avenue S.W. and Springbrook Creek and. .between S.W. 27th and S.W. 30th Streets SM-86-80 PACIFIC NORTHWEST BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY ECF-630-80 Application for Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit to allow installation of steel 18" OD casing pipe within the Bronson Way Bridge that crosses the Cedar River west of City Hall SA-008-81 WM. S. TSAO & CO. (POITRAS) ECF-005-81 Application for site approval for develop- ment of small shopping center to be situ- ated on three lots; property located on the south side of N.E. 4th Street approxi- mately 600 feet west of Union Avenue N.E. MD) Exli 111 \,\ • .EN-i-rro,„ or I 0 ILA IT /A 124 q/Y1, t, 0 f/h FU INC. (t) LI _JAN 1 ..6........ 1c31 .... P. 0 BOX 509 • RENON, %NASH.98055 • 226 1001 JIG DS? October 31, 1980 Mr. James Colt Mt. Olivet Cemetery P. O. Box 547 Renton, WA. 98055 Dear Mr. Colt: You have our permission for use of roadway to your property from N. E. 3rd Avenue. Sincerely, STONE= CONCRETE R. H. DeBoer General Manager RHD:pap OF RAGA 4 «� z THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 talL BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT o 235- 2550 O94, SE0E���P January 9, 1981 CERTIFIED MAIL NO. 733666 RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. Mr. James Colt, President Mt. Olivet Cemetery Co. , Inc. P.O. Box 547 Renton, Washington 98055 RE: ENVIRONMENTAL PEVIEW, MT. OLIVET CEMETERY, SPECIAL PERMIT SP--047-80 Dear Mr. Colt: On both October 29th and November 19th, I informed you in writing of additional information required by the Environmental Review Committee to properly evaluate the environmental impacts of your proposed fill and grading permit request for Mt. Olivet Cemtery. It appears that sufficient time has been provided for you to respond. The Environmental Review Committee has determined that without the information requested they must issue a Declaration of Significance. Therefore, if the requested information is not provided by January 16th, the Environmental Review Committee will issue a Declaration of Significance on January 20th. In addition, the matter of the legal status of the present "annual grading license" will be referred to the Building Department and City Attorney in light of the applicant' s apparent lack of "good faith. " Very truly yours, 1\-„ii„qt 1164. Roger J. B aylock, Associate Planner cc: Theodore Gathe, Attorney CERTIFIED MAIL NO. 733667 RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. Mayor Public Works Director City Attorney Building Official Planning Directo.: C OF R4,� • A. :.. � z THE CITY OF ', E TON 41® MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, A•-;H. 98055 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR ® PLANNING DEPARTMENT 9.0 co' • 235- 2550 o9qiFp SEPj, November 19, 1980 Mr. James Colt, President , 1 Mt. Olivet Cemetery Co. , Inc. f ,!�{ P.O. Box 547 -r Renton, Washington 98055 RE: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW, MT. OLIVET CEMETERY SPECIAL PERMIT SP-047-80 Dear Mr. Colt: On October 29, 1980, a letter was sent to you requesting additional information concerning the above application. The Environmental Review Committee prior to making their threshold determination needs to have that information available. Therefore, the Committee has requested that the information be submitted within a maximum of 30 days or by December 18, - 1980. The Committee has conducted on-site inspections of the subject property and have become concerned over the type of material utilized in the fill operation. It does not appear that the material is as stated in the application request. This is an enforcement problem and not a primary concern of the Environmental Review Committee; however, the Committee would like you to reiterate the type of materials being utilized in the fill operation. • If you should have any further questions concerning this request, please do not hesitate to contact this department at 235-2550. Very truly yours , Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director C Roger J. laylock,1 Associate Planner RJB;sh ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE November 19 , 1980 AGENDA COMMENCING AT 10: 00 A.M. : THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM OLD BUSINESS : SA-092-80 VALLEY OFFICE PARK, PARK II ECF-602-80 Application for site approval for four 2-story office building complexes ; property located on the southwest corner of S.W. Lind Avenue and S.W. 16th Street SP-047-80 MT. OLIVET CEMETERY CO. ECF-567-80 Application for special permit to fill and grade 11-acre expansion area; property located north and east of existing Mt. Olivet Cemetery , east of NE 3rd Street , in the vicinity of 100 Blaine Avenue NE SP-099-80 RAINIER SAND & GRAVEL CO. ECF-608-80 Application for special permit to fill and grade approx. 1. 6 million cubic yards over life of project; property located 370 ' south of N.E. 3rd Street on hill east of Mt . Olivet Cemetery SA-104-80 V-105-80 BARBER, KLOPPENBURG, OLDS (SUNSET ECF-614-80 SQUARE) Application for site approval of small neighborhood shopping center (to include bank and/or restaurant) and condominiums or professional offices; variance for 10-12 ' rear yard setback instead of required 20 ' ; property located on NE corner of Sunset Blvd. NE and Union Avenue NE NEW BUSINESS : NONE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE NOVEMBER 12, 1980 AGENDA COMMENCING AT 10 :00 A .M. : THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM 1 . OLD BUSINESS : SA-092-80 VALLEY OFFICE PARK , PARK II ECF-602-80 Application for site approval for four 2-story office building complexes ; property located on the southwest corner of S .W . Lind Avenue and S .W . 16th Street SP-047-80 MT . OLIVET CEMETERY CO . ECF-567-80 Application for special permit to fill and grade 11-acre expansion area ; property located north and east of existing Mt . Olivet Cemetery , east of NE 3rd Street , in the vicinity of 100 Blaine Avenue N .E . SP-099-80 RAINIER SAND & GRAVEL CO . ECF-608-80 Application for special permit to fill and grade of approx . 450 ,000-500 ,000 cubic yards over life of project ; property located 370 ' south of N . E . 3rd Street on hill east of Mt . Olivet Cemetery SA-104-80 BARBER, KLOPPENBURG, OLDS ( SUNSET SQUARE) V-105-80 Application for site approval of small ECF-614-80 neighborhood shopping center ( to include (Reconsideration ) bank and/or restaurant ) and condominiums or professional offices ; variance for 10-12 ' rear yard setback instead of required 20 ' ; property located on NE corner of Sunset Blvd. NE and Union Avenue NE B-240 RUSSELL D . BIRD, ACKERELY COMMUNICATIONS ECF-620-80 Application for permit to erect free standing, two sided billboard sign for Ackerely Communications ; property located 4224 E . Valley Road 2 . NEW BUSINESS : R-106-80 DOMINIC COLASURDO ECF-617-80 Application for rezone from R-3 to B-1 to prepare site for future fill and grade and construction of commercial building ; property located esat side of Union Avenue NE approx . 350 ' south of N . E . 4th Street • M ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE OCTOBER 29, 1980 AGENDA COMMENCING AT 10 :00 A .M. : THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM 1. OLD BUSINESS : SP-047-80 MT. OLIVET CEMETERY CO. ECF-567-80 Application for special permit to fill and grade 11-acre expansion area; property located north and east of existing Mt . Olivet Cemetery, east of NE 3rd Street, in the vicinity of 100 Blaine Avenue N.E . *Applicant has not provided new information. 2. NEW BUSINESS : SP-099-80 RAINIER SAND & GRAVEL INC . ECF-608-80 Application for special permit for fill and grade of approx. 450, 000-500, 000 cubic yards over life of project ; property located approx. 370' south of N.E . 3rd Street on hill east of Mt. Olivet Cemetery. SA-104-80 BARBER, KLOPPENBURG, OLDS (SUNSET SQUARE) V-105-80 Application for site approval of small ECF-614-80 neighborhood shopping center (to include bank and/or restaurant) and condominiums or professional offices ; Variance for 10-12 ' rear-yard setback instead of the required 20' is also requested; property located on NE corner of Sunset Blvd . NE and Union Avenue NE . ECF-615-80 RAINIER ANNEXATION (REVISED) Petition for annexation of ±22 acres along west side of Rainier Avenue North between S .E . 121st and 122nd, if extended easterly. B-228 ED LIDZBARDSKI ECF-616-80 Application for building permit to construct 7200 sq. ft. 2-story office building ; Building "A" ; property located at 313 S .W. Grady Way. j r OF R`r,, _ THE CITY OF RENTON Y MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 o $ BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR ® PLANNING DEPARTMENT co- 235- 2550 42- 4re0 seP1E,10 October 29, 1980 Mr . James Colt , President Mt . Olivet Cemetery Company, Inc . P .O . Box 547 Renton, Washington 98055 RE : ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW/MT . OLIVET CEMETERY SPECIAL PERMIT SP-047-80 Dear Mr . Colt : Pursuant to our telephone conversation of October 22 , 1980 , the Environmental Review Committee has reviewed the proposed special permit for fill and grade and found that they need additional information specifically addressing: (1 ) A temporary erosion control and storm water retention plan ( 2) A copy of the document which gives Mt . Olivet Cemetery legal access across Puget Power right-of-way to access onto N .E . 3rd Street and , (3) Estimated impacts resulting from the traffic generated to fill and grade the subject site upon that access onto N .E . 3rd . Prior to this department setting any public hearing date before the Hearing Examiner , the Environmental Review Committee must reach a decision . Therefore, until the. information is submitted the application will be delayed. The Environmental Review Committee meets every Wednesday and the information needs to be submitted by Friday at 5 :00 p.m , to be heard the following Wednesday . If you should have any further questions regarding this matter , plesae do not hesitate to contact this department . Very truly yours , Gordon Y . Ericksen , Planning Director e k-1/4.2ta,.A.su4 Roger J . dlaylo4, Associate Planner 1 l ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEU COMMITTEE OCTOBER 22, 1980 AGENDA • COMMENCING AT 10 :00 A.M. : THIRD FLOOR ' CONFERENCE ROOM 1 . NEW BUSINESS : SP-047-80 MT. OLIVET CEMENTERY CO . (ECF-567-80 ) Application for special permit to fill and grade 11-acre expansion area ; property located north and east of existing Mt. Olivet Cementery, east of N .E. 3rd Street , in the vicinity of 100 Blaine Avenue N.E. R-101-80 DUANE WELLS, INC . / PUGET (ECF-610-80 ) SOUND POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY Application for rezone from G to B-1 ; property located • on the north side of S .W. Grady Way between Lind Avenue. S.W. and Rainier Avenue South . TP-102-80 BOEING COMMERCIAL AIRPLANE (ECF-612-80 ) Crik'PANY Application for temporary permit to allow use of a modular building as an employee food service facility to support the Boeing 757 Program; property located immediately east of Building 502, which is within the southeast corner , 0 of the Renton Municipal Airport , approximately 500 ' west. of- the East Perimeter Road . , we • MT. OLIVET CEMETERY COMPANY, INC. P.O. BOX 547 RENTON, WA 98055 (206) 255-0323 September 15, 1980 Roger J. Blaylock The City of Renton Planning Department - Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington, 98055 Re: Letter - August 28, 1980 Special Permit SP-047-80 Dear Mr. Blaylock: In examining our files I find the plans were submitted to the Building Department on March 4, 1980 with additional sets submitted to the City in May of 1980 to conform with their request for additional information. With respect,-to each of the points of Mr. Munson' s letter of May 16, 1980, the map of existing natural drainage system appears on Page 1 of the Plan and Profile', for the roadway permit pre- pared by Hugh Goldsmith including the existing creek,place- ments of drain tiles and pipe, existing ditches and temporary detention pond and plans for the rock protected road ditches to control future drainage. Sheet 2 describes in detail in- stallation and type and location of catch basins, inlets and storm drainage pipe and the location and type of curbs and gutters for the control of drainage. With respect to the location and structures and site: map,zI have enclosed copies of the structures located within the Cemetery. These structures are not a subject of the Special Permit. They consist of the existing Maintenance Building and Mausoleum, neither of which- are located on that land covered by the Special Permit. Any structures to be placed on the area in question have yet to be proposed %by the Cor- poration, but would naturally have to comply with any ordin- ances regulating future deviopment. 11,ENP0 42- SERVING 4@ "•" \ KING AN! O :' COUNTY N11V C - SINCE 1875 Page 2 - Continued The original permit indicates 50 foot setbacks on the Northern and Western boundaries of the property. I have added these to the site map and indicated the existing tree lines which shall not be disturbed during the reclamation. With regard to a landscaping plan the existing trees as indicated shall remain on the property. The balance of the land, when restored to specified elevations, shall be hydroseeded and allowed to re- main in a natural undeveloped state until the Cemetery deter- mines the future development use of the property as provided in the existing use codes prior to any replatting or develop- ment of the subject property. Approval will be secured from the City through proper application. I have attached a des- cription of the Work Methods and Materials Used which were part of the original application for the existing Special Permit. I hope this information enables you to complete processing our Special Permit. If there is any additional information needed, please let me kn'. . Very t ,uly yours, MT. 0 VE / t M ;, ERY, CO. , INC. 1kW'Nip Jaa es L. Colt Pr-sident JL :vk cc: Theodore Gathe Mayor City Attorney Public Works Director EXHIBIT A-1 Re: Description of Work Methods and Rehabilitation: In summary, the intent of the work is to restore the cemetery to a usuable facility. The construction waste fill will be covered with 2 ' of material base and 6" of topsoil. The fill areas and sides of the site will be returned to their natural levels. Areas with scrub trees and brush and topsoil will be reclaimed using the following procedure: Contractor shall: 1. Obtain approval of Cemetery regarding removal or relocation or destruction of trees. 2. Remove and store the topsoil, on site, in areas designated by "Cemetery" . 3. Restore elevations by filling low areas with construction waste material and compacting. This material will be placed in five foot lifts. Compaction. Compaction fill material and mixture of the mater- ial shall be such as to provide a relatively uniform density with no extreme soft spots. Density shall be as high as pos- sible in accordance with good mixing compacting standards and shall at no time be less than forty (40) percent of the density of a similar sample of material compacted under ideal conditions by providing a fifty (50) pound square foot surcharge on a one (1) cubic foot sample of the material. Broken wood, building material and related debris from structure removal (exclusive of brick and concrete) shall be satisfactorily broken.and crushed to provide a reasonable compacted cell when covered by granular material. Protection shall be provided for any wood or burnable material to prevent fire either on the sur- face or subsurface. The earth cover on any cell containing flammable material including paper or wood, shall be sufficiently covered to prevent spread of flames should combustion occur 'in any cell due to spontaneous combustion. Stabilization. Brick, broken concrete, crushed building materials, not including extensive wooden or flammable matter, may be utilized in enbankment where they may be of assistance in preventing undue sliding, water scouring of voids which might harbor vermin. This material shall be sufficiently mixed or covered with suitable granular material to prevent unsightly effects. 5. When the desired elevation has been attained, the con- tractor will place 2 feet of natural fill from the site on the construction waste material. Compaction will be the same as above. 6: Placement or replacement of 6" of topsoil will follow the placement of natural fill. 7. Hydroseeding after placement of topsoil shall be done on each area as it is completed. The mixture shall be fiber 2,000 lbs. per acre; seed 168 lbs. per acre; fertilizer 50 lbs. per acre; and water 3,250 gallons per acre. Watering, after hydroseeding, shall be as required until full germination. In areas that have already been excavated, the following process will be followed in developing areas for grave sites : 1. Remove topsoil and other material conforming with setback and slope requirements and stockpile on site. 2. Place construction waste material to be compacted as noted above. 3. When the desired elevation has been attained place the natural fill and topsoil as noted above. 4. Hydroseed as noted above. The tops and toes of cut and fill slopes shall be set back from set- back lines as far as necessary to preserve the setback for the safety and benefit of adjacent properties, the adequacy of foundations, and to prevent damage as a result of water run-off or erosion of the slopes. Distance to the setback line for the top of slopes shall be a mini- mun of ten (10) feet. The distance to structures shall be as follows : Slope Height Top Toe Less than 11 feet 5 feet 3 feet. 11 - 30. 0 feet 7 feet Height 12 feet 31 Feet and over 10 .feet 15 feet Noise levels at all operations shall be controlled to prevent undue nuisance to. the public. Maximum allowable daytime sound pressure as measured in any residential zone shall not exceed 60 DB at least ninety (90)' percent of the time between the hours of 7 :00 A. M. and 3: 30 P. M. Permitted Work Hours. All work done shall be between the hours of 7:00 A. M. and 3 :30 P. M. , Monday through Friday, except repairs to machinery. Discharge of materials into the air or water shall be subject to the requirements of the appropriate governing agency. Activities shall be operated so as to confine dust and mud to the site. Access roads shall be maintained in such a condition that confines the mud and dust to the site. Such roads shall be improved to a width sufficient to permit the unhindered movement of emergency vehicles. Soil erosion and sedimentation shall be confined to the site by such means as .a temporary cover of vegetation, mulches, diversions, sedimentation ponds or other acceptable methods. No toxic materials ' shall be allowed to wash from the site or be discharged in receiving water courses. Fill Material Used. The fill shall consist of building demolition debris, wood, concrete, rebar, land clearing, stumps, brush, dirt, sand, gravel, asphalt, brick, crushed building debris and other such material applicable to demolition i.e. wire, metal, conduite, plastic, etc. • .1 ""...f t: 7.-'...,1\f'I \JC1/4, •y •if s j• ,' s .. 1/4' U .• / / • a i ko c0 a•r../ ,/ ‘sl •:./ :.-'.." -..... ,..1•7 I, " iT. .S" °•70- I"I Pi •J'N ...... Se ./ •....9 .. t c• -- ..i., --. ••.-. 4,,,,,,.1,?-c., -c. .. ---- / , 6:1... 54 0 • • . • • •74/ it,' : -: A' • S' 1 i 1 rz.6 7.-z.ios Co Ct Jim,' •••• I: • - (?• n 1,1. • • . k. .3C c. - --- ---------- -f. 1 I c- it/ .13rt• i. \ . T.L.2 ir, . -• 41/4,4-•: ":.. N. , cr‘ , v .---- ,:0; c.,/ •-- X....7:.:;,. N.N..,,..,.,.............„...„: 1 • \ ...•'....„ \ ••• ...-1 . • ' !.. .., . 0 • i . . .IN,..1 1.5 • I ,N, • "... ••• .. .......•-••••....' , , • .•i ..; i CITY oF RENToN . . .0 . ... t . . . - --tic..... tytt.tt,1-8-1 , ‘-c• T.020 i • -.§-.:..* --, •.\\, . ••ct,„ t p"--- Z . 1 ....- ..---••- ..D,_ -:-.::::---- „ _. . - ---2:::":"--- ••••.. 24/4 .. .0..9:.:AG: t, mob.ritz..• ,,\• .'1.1) • ..c... ... --j- "......- -c,:,•••- • )ST'.... •• Z T 1..15• ia t•1' . ,,,,...-- • a) k......, 46 :t..:'• ' pY• . .co-----------------_ _..----- 0 -- . _... r% - • -- E • • ..---.- ,A.i° C-7 I -916- • -la • r A ce-- ‘, t .,,----- • -- . ...........,-, I,1..A - _,..--- 5T p- La\ .... . _.- . •. 8.1 _.7.--- _7,0_0 i 1 -.' •:.' --c•--- ,a7. ------- ri- is . , . ,- . .. •,. .,_ • _....„. .1.i...,-z /07 14.6. WH11E -- \ i T6- •..c.: -._ . s CI-7R r'..L;e-,.1 05 •. -s ...:f • I &t: / c t - l .66 c. rn.30Aci,.., P c• • .. - moNTE- T-L./L*7 s • . 0 . .• . .. s- I. 1Z\ --.: 1 ti_62S• R Z. . -- 1 '.71 4II .±_i_. . ' ' t , \N .' • 1111 1.'. -• .12 rz...?....‘e.., )1 ... 1. i 44.1 0.32-11tc a 11_127 *t ‘ CJ .7/0.:•..::. , il I • r.\ C.1: ' GC •-1 L...,7-:",21. g <7,c) ,. 65.:-.; . c. . .• .: as, -_,Isui -ia - •;..., „. ,0 , -.._ ,. z •• • ,I.'' .., .,,.• • , --. 4'.• •.:...7. 4 • 8 ? " ..1 -= -.0.35 - . . • . r-•!_-:•••1 ,.-, . .... la .z...,. ,; i..: .... ;.\ .; ..r..„._____‘ , a _,, , • , • t . ••••111.3--. 1. 2 6, r 73, .. . . . • 7 L.EZ.9''' IF' I . l ZI. .. FR IL 1 171) A ; ,,,II•LI ... 0 , J-14-, Jr . ._,. „, -iy ,, ..,[_. Tod,- -1 ••: !.:.•,i A qp,, 40.- erA..,„ jil; isik.r doilk, . 27,---5?- , . _ . , . • .__ 0 I-14 WI-a 1; 4 - ..: P.- .,.. th •,--4. . -2-1 - \ .. • . ti• P • ail, . ni5 1 4, . i. 1-3 , ili .1140 . Lu .____ i. lb 1 i •-\\ \-.. . CHARLES SHAME t.' Cr. • -4 0 ..:* 7 9 12-7.... - t•. 1 101 , • 1061$-2 5 I1•11.• . 11 r.1 (i . • •\ ‘•-.:\ Jo t it • .....- -tin= -rum„., rs.,..., ,it .,,,Eta..e, I "'" ..) a\r"r F-1:- %-:7'1'21f 411-!e''''.. .12'1: A • LIV , - I I . \.....•'>,. •-• . 6'-d• - I 4.1. i - ----. 1 3 c., ix al ' ' 11 I 9, i , \-.), 7'•• Et' •-. id! • ' 13 i ti• - 1 - 11 _ . .. el2c.:1-1; • 1 s•, \ ' \"!'• .;N -. i .Alir • OLIVET CEhtIVI-ERY ai-u K--Pr'„I thnik-r• j- \ "\•• •:. 4 43 0 • 6.30 Ac. \--1 ' . . •i - i- 519 t-i : • ar•-: c: . •, \\ •::.....,:\ •... ...t) • 7.1./32 1 ) ' ' ti - --- .t. 7 G 1 m.... • .:`1 \ • ...... •,. '1. \ SA' ILI . CC 0:: 4: ... 1 Z f I 4.t-i X... t: • . 1.'4) •. II • % . "1. '• ,'.11 en r'• ,lc, ......._._,..„„ , ,. ii. • N,, •:. •N -if _- , 1-.1A tw-cf.:7.!,::i It‘.i., __ ,:. ‹ • i, , \ 6 isjt 611.4 p?... r-N.LA,‘.,;,.. , . .(7./ -3, ....„. ... z : .,. _ ___ :.-,.3•••..,...,,,...1...z;,,, • ii ••• ••-••-•--' "-'...••" i '.' 1 \ \ \ c 6 , '1 , . ; • '-' - "7„:...i'',-'7"*0 ; . ''' -• t••• , -r '---,•i .. i OLIVET II Ji.f -- , .\\*, -•• •••: ,,, , . • \\i ' .. • I r-., \ • - vt ..4.... .(., • . . • \ ‘.• ; ‘ , r, v . .. ti.. . , .0 , zy.....- - :1 i •-1---, i _i_t-_./._,_.71- \._:.,,) r 1.\. 1 li -.., I \ . <,t. - r El-641:147971i--1`---- \\‘`..\\. 1 Ln • 4tk...;.cf.4.:1-7---1- :,,,_17:. 1.-:, 17.., •11•", --7_,:li. UrIZ• 7 i 1• I C.C1 i \ , 1..n ,,....____....... ... ;........cr)r A....-4---" .., c., 1.2_pi.- cq 12.1 ," 1 i •. •--:1.-:1.s. 0 •• - ..., - _._ .1.4.1,141 1"tut 0 1-r-c•.4•041 - -I 1 74 •e I 1:117 \ : ' '' -'... -" "-- / r` , • MT. OLIVET CEMETERY COMPANY, INC. P.O. BOX 547 RENTON, WA 98055 (206) 255-0323 September 8,. 1980 Roger J. Blaylock. . The City of Renton , . Planning Department , Municipal Building . 200 Mill Avenue South . . ' Renton, Washington .98055' , . Re: Letter - August 28, 1980 . Special Permit SP-047-80 Dear Mr. Blaylock: • Received your correspondence of'.this date and was not : aware that you. did not have the information requested.. •I ' will :examine our files and provide copies or more detailed originals for the. specific items requested. I was 'under. the' impression that this. information had been provided previously. . • I and Mt. Olivet _Cemetery appreciate the effort and con-' • . cern shown by your Department and the Building Department in handl;ing• this reclamation project. - Additional copies of the information requested shall be provided no later than September 15, 1980: : Thank: ou for your cooperation in this matter. Sinc -r-ly, , MT. 0 IVE fEMETERY COMPANY, IN_ C. • 1/h'i, frjr� , % . . . „,i, . Ja es L. Colt � yr,.- (�gab i�• c Pr-sident �/'• Ri. . J d:vk - _ (J j 9 la$U • • c �P: T. Gathe S I- \\e - ' - • ,c . 9/1,4gNG D " • SERVING • ' KING . COUNTY . SINCE • 1875 OF !? • �y , ° THE CITY OFRENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 n ® ` '_` BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR ® PLANNING DEPARTMENT o9o,Pq co August 28 , 1980 235- 2550 TFD SEP'vE� CERTIFIED MAIL F1r . James Colt , President Mt . Olivet Cemetery Company , Inc . P . 0. Box 547 Renton, Washington 9805.5 RE : CORRESPONDENCE , DATE MAY 16 , 1980/MT . OLIVET CEMETERY SPECIAL PERMIT SP-047-80 Dear Mr . Colt : On May 16th , correspondence was sent to you requesting addi- tional information to complete the application for a special permit to allow filling and grading. The letter clearly stated that , "Should you have any questions , contact this office or the Public Works Department for assistance. " As of this date, we have not received the additional information requested. Please find a copy of that letter attached. It would seem that ninety days is sufficient time to generate the requested information . The City of Renton has issued the Annual Grading License in "good faith , " anticipating that you would actively continue in the permit process . Therefore, if your application is not fully complete and accepted for processing by this Department within thirty days , by September 30, 1980 , the Planning Department will request that the Building Department withdraw the Annual Grading License and the City Attorney take appropriate action. Very truly yours, Gordon Y. Ericksen Planning Director • " -ff(1 Le.fl Roger J. Blaylock Associate Planner RJB :wr • cc : Mr. Theodore Gathe (Certified Mail) Young & Gathe, Inc . P. S. 1101 Dexter Horton Building Seattle, WA 98104 Mayor City Attorney Public Works Director .d • v mf, • THE CITY OF ENTON �'�"'• MUNICIPAL BUILDING G 200 MILL AVE. So. RENTOG`�il,WASH.91055 ,, QARBARA Y. sHIPVPOCH, MAYOR ® PLANNING DEPARTMENT 9,0 4l6G sEYz`,A��P 235- 2550 May 16, 1980 Mr. James Colt , President Mt. Olivet Cemetery Company, Inc. . PO Box 547 Renton, Washington 98055 • RE : MT OLIVET CEMETERY S eeial Permit SP-047-80 Dear Mr. Colt : Review of the above application file indicates that some items required by Section 4-2307 of the Mining, Excavation & Grading Ordinance have not been included. In order to complete your file and continue processing, submit please subs at the following : (1) Map of existing natural drainage system . (2) A drainage control plan (3) Location of structures and site map (4) Rehabilitation plan (5) Setbacks on site map (6) Landscaping plan (7) Description of work methods (8) Description of fill materials used and/or proposed Attached for your information is a co 4-2307 explains the .above requirements . Shouldoyouf e have nany que tiich contact this office or the Public Works Depar.unent for assistance. Very truly yours , Gordon Y. Ericksen, • Planning Director 4g;T—'-1-144. Steve Munson, Assistant Planner cc: Theodore Cathe, Young .Lathe, Inc. , P.S . 1101 Dexter Horton Bldg. , Seattle, WA 98104 Public Works Director A OF RA, 0 THE CITY OF RENTON `$ ® Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH.98055 n BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 04 co- 235- 2550 0,9gTE'D SEP-C°# MEMORANDUM May 19 , 1980 TO : Files FROM :e , Roger J . Blaylock , Associate Planner RE : MT . OLIVET CEMETERY , TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION OFFICE The Planning Department is in receipt of a letter to Mr . James Colt from the Building Department dated May 13 , 1980 . In that letter he suggests that the applicant should contact the Planning Department for a special permit to allow the use of an office structure in a temporary building . As of this date we have received no inquiry from Mr . Colt . RJB ;sh OF R4,1 THE CITY OF RENTON V 6 a MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 oNIL BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 9A 235- 2550 o9gteo sEel t-���P May16 1980 Mr. James Colt, President Mt. Olivet Cemetery Company, Inc. PO Box 547 Renton, Washington 98055 RE : MT. OLIVET CEMETERY, Special Permit SP-047-80 Dear Mr. Colt : Review of the above application file indicates that some items required by Section 4-2307 of the Mining , Excavation & Grading Ordinance have not been included. In order to complete your file and continue processing, please submit the following : (1) Map of existing natural drainage system (2) A drainage control plan (3) Location of structures and site map (4) Rehabilitation plan (5) Setbacks on site map (6) Landscaping plan (7) Description of work methods (8) Description of fill materials used and/or proposed Attached for your information is a copy of Section 4-2307 which explains the above requirements . Should you have any questions , contact this office or the Public Works Department for assistance . Very truly yours , Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director ,4aT77,(4/17/ evA Steve Munson, Assistant Planner cc : Theodore Gathe, Young & Gathe, Inc. , P . S . 1101 Dexter Horton Bldg. , Seattle, WA 98104 Public Works Director OF R4, 3 4* °0 ; 7_ PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION 235 -2540 .J3. o 9 .-MUNICIPAL,,BUI'LDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON.WASH.98055 • May 13, 1980 O��rFO eFotE ��Q' BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR /7-1)\- H " �r(^lit 1.1C1 _, �, Mr. James Colt Mt. Olivet Cemetery Co., Inc. • !! n, 80 P.O. Box 547 Renton, Washington Subject: Installing Office.Trailer for ':: " ,���?.ram' • Temporary Construction Office Dear Mr. Colt: As discussed by telephone on May 12, 1980, temporary:-construction shacks (offices) are customarily allowed to be located on construc- tion sites during the time of construction of buildings. They are considered as a necessary piece of the contractor's equipment used during the construction of a building. • • The permit which you possess is-an---Annual License for fill and not a permit to construct a building. However, if you can demonstrate to .the City that a temporary construction shack is in fact essen- tial for your fill operation and is located at a strategic location on' the fill site, We may consider allowing the shack under the same ' philosophy as the construction shacks. Such offices could only be used as an office relating to your fill and not for any other pur- pose. • If .your intent is to use the shack for an office for the cemetery,;, operation a Special Permit will be required. Please contact the City's Planning Department for an application for the Special Pei^soif. • Sincerely, - • WARREN C. GONNASON, P.E'. • PUBLIC WORKS DIRE,CTOR- • James C. Hanson Assistant Building Supervisor • JCH/mp • • cc: Planning Department • tF1\/E " \ CITY OF RENTON - Ck 11:11 PPL CATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT lc 2 5 o MAY. 6 198 1-AIL . 947 FOR OFFICE USE " File No . SP- f 14—T7 = 6 Y Y -j c Date Rec' d Application Fee $ Receipt . No . Environmental Review Fee $ . . .. APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 6 : 1.. Name MT. OLIVET CEMETAR'' COMPANY',INC. Phone • 2550323 • Address , P.- O. Box 547, Renton, 'W'as-hington 58Q55 2. _ Property location North and east of existing platted cemetary, pi, vicinity' of of Northeast hird Street, in vicinit of 100 .Blain a n��PnnP N,F 3. L galpocesciptioifh aRYadditional sheet if necessary) Attached. • 4 . • Number of acres. or ,square feet apnr. ng . 1 1 arrP4 " Present Zoning public use . or quasi public use Applicant is presently What do you propose to :develop on this property? pp P y filling. Q.nd grading in order to rehab l_tt.a_t,p 'aba'ndnnPri •urfaca wa g area and provide further pan s i nn for Mt. Ol i'vP1- orniPl- y 6 . The following information shall be • submitted. with"this application : . A. . Site and access plan . (,include"setbacks , - • Scale existing structures", easements , and other . factors limiting development) 1" = 10' or 20 ' B. Parking, landscaping and screening plan . 1" = 10 ' C. Vicinity map (include land-use-and zoning on adjacent parcels) 1" =. 200 ' to 800 ' D. Building height and area (existing and proposed) E. 'A special permit required. by- the Renton Mining , Excavation and Grading Ordinance shall submit the information listed in Section 4-2307.5 in addition to the above. 7 . LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER' S ACTION: . Date Approved Date Denied . • ' . . Date Appealed Appeal. Action • • Remarks • • • Planning Dept. 1-77 • • AFFIDAVIT ' • • American Memorial Services , Inc. James L. Copt-Pres. (A Washington Corp. I, ,Corp. ) duly sworn, declare that I am the owner of: the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and 'sworn before me this (0 day of , 19 S i�% Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at , 9 Amer. . n Memorial Services , Inc. By: . - es L. /Colt , President (Name of Notary ublic) (Sigr -/�� ner frft e(Ada 79LD '1����P $ P. 1 . Box -&3f o. •S'c,4'7 dress) Address Co RfCEIVEp/ko S ;-e RSk.l l Washington 13-3 �, _(City) (State) MAY 1 444L SA e - 255-0323 � bEP ARKS (Telephone) (FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION • This is to certify that -the foregoing application has been inspected by me and has been found to be thorough and complete in every particular and to conform to the rules and regulations of the Renton Planning Department governing the filing of such application . Date Received , 19 By: • Renton Planning Dept . 2-73 •."' c a i Y• 0,:. RENTON, S1.1I I'G T Old • • . '. E1IVIRM:::ENitL': CliECi(LISi 1:01 ;•1 ' FOR' OFFICE USE ONLY. _, .. Application• N o. ' •, 1O---'2'/7J"" 1. , .4 `' Environmental:Checklist Jo : 5_,-� • • PROPOSED,, date - • -. . ,. FINAL:, date 0 Declaration_'of Significance. Oeclaratio_n of Significance - Declaration of, Non-•Significance :, Declaration of Non-Signifficance-.•`. ' • -- Co cMENTS.. ., ... •. 1 .• --• ' Introduction • .Ther State En.vironmenta-1 .Policy Act of., T971 , Chapter,.43,21C. RCSt, requires -all• state and local m governental .agencies' .to 'consider environ'aental' values both. for':their, • •:i: .'. o:vn• actions and when•.licensing• pr-ivate .proposais . The,'Act•also requires th t "an•.EIS be prepared .for „all major .actions.•.significantly .affecting•. the 'quality' of the •envi'renm,eni . The purpose:•;of:•:thi.s'.:checkl 1st ,i's'- .to help. •the agencies i:n.voived determine .whether: or: not..:;_' ;', '; .., • proposal.. i s such a•major act;i on-: ;-.. • Please answer• the followin• g questiona .as, completely as you can-.•with`"'the^,infornatior..- � .•-•. •,. ;- presently available• to..you.::: Where .exp•lanations .of your.:.a'nswers are required, or' where. ,. . . .. . •.you believe:an -explanat'ion ,would be...helpru-,l •to .•go.vernment..deci;s;ion. m a;cers ,: include your ,, explanation in the -,.space..p'rorided•,'-or 'us-e additional pages'-'i1 'necessary. ' -You should :include., references to.•any -reports: or' studies of which you are aware.;a'd:►ihich. are •rele- ~'• ,,....•, , • .vant' to. the.. answers you provide.... Complete answers :to .these questions :note• will help all '. ...'• agencies. ,involved with 'your .propos:al;;•-to undertake the required environmental. .review w,i:t',1=•'- , .'. - - 'out -unnecessary delay : The following; questions''app'l•y•••to your*tota'l:pr.oposal ,."not just to the' license for trhich -: :-you :are: currently..applying ,or the proposal for which.,approval •is 'sought:. ;-,Your answers ::.:;r, should include the impacts :which will...be' caused• by•.your,proposal wiien'•.•it is completed;; . even though completion 'may,not':occur until` sometime •in"•"• tire .future.::-'This wil.l;.•allow :all :.:.i': •-....:,..,.:: '-- of'.the agencies:.which ,ill be:involved..: e.to complet the.i.r environs;antal••.review •noe;.,:with, ";:;• .: • '•out duplicating paperwork in •the future. '.• NOTE• This is;a standard:' form' being' 'ised by' all._..state and local •agencies •in .the State ;, ;'. of Washington for various•°'.types of :proposals. •riany;.of •the-•questions .may not ,apply to • your proposal . If a':questi on'does not-• apply,, just .answer 'it "no" and •continue -'on to. the =- .'. • next question .•_ • .1, • E.N R T N K I.i:,' YI ONMEN AL C EC LIST FOR . I.... BACKGROUND - . , ' . -• ,. , . 1 - Name of.:.Proponent, • Mt. Olivet .Cern't:crni. Vie., Trio_ .. • 2'. Address. and •phone •'number'o f•-Pr opo nen t: � : . .. .. .. • ' . . - , • TIt. Olivet. C1.-to 7 n,• �' }}[:„Y� P. e �® i7.. 3.:.8c/,. Ar�M1-.ztiC•- "!� �n).1:73 . • • 3, Date. Checkl'ist:•submitted• 1:. ` i‘iii• 6,� .-.✓1 O . - ' - 4. Agency requiring Checklist li/A • • 5 : Name of proposal ;: if applicable: . lit. .O2L: t C:__-:1r-e�:7 Gray:: ::;i�� b+3°;'10:=e-t ..- . . ' • . ' . .- • ••. - • 6. Nature and brief description''of •the'proposal (including bu not limited to its• . • : _ ' .size; genera•l".design elements, and other" factors that will .give 'an accurate • , " • understanding of .Its•. scope and .nature} : :- • An autlinorl. h7' ?1.'.1r.:11.:2!1 ' 27?.t• i7 •37.111flin' 11a?.t.q ti—lin. .?' l!'n..:::V...^'_1. Ct"' :f.2 . ti ."!'.{n , •3 Zn. na-'1 (l^^.m.t :t.- 1 f 3 r1 n.sr� .. _•I r?.y °•, ' � ..?�� �:a.:.a �a:I 3 ��.:� S .. :�..a�• ... z.� �Z: ..b. 0__v�i: C _ i�... �.. r.�..__ .J _.- • :c:;~ear hating; b:..:�z: ?;ar:W1^t.;o13 ainte 1377°a',Zr:3 bein3 q^�ro---�,i ^��.. .r� . '. a^c.epted 7:^.edi. Aea. .:1/2 .. ':.3•tinifta2m a c— .,='3.y de7,-2.077--::. 0. ; ;` -, , ,; . -. , ' ` • • • 2- 7. Location of proposal ,(describe the' physical setting of •the proposal , as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental ,impacts , including any other information needed to give an; accurate understanding o; the' environ- mental setting ,of the proposal ) ; 3c .� fl > o5` �' ��-1�`'. ? �3 a to 510 `RC> 7�; !;w' ^ �'il+iti.:a I. c_ 'c; �1"v'�la3Cx] J '•_�'7,^., • • imated date or omple'tion f ,thc':proposal : • • 9..' ,,List of •'all permits'',:' 1 ' enses or governmr^t approv,a i s required for' the propose i•" • (federal,,,, state an ocai-.-includir,g 'rezones) : " • • Do you have any plans, for future additions', expansion, or further activity,, '` related: to or connected -with. this 'proposal? If yes , explain: _. 12:.;; Do you know .ofany plans,;by. othe.rs which• may affect the,.,prope,rty„covered by your proposal'?. 'If.. yes explain: Prt;Db.„2,11 E �i^;.^;,'17 R'��'� s ,,FJ ^j!�o (t.,.��,i:.�� G of•13 %1'''.r'? ,. ..^•..^1 • ' 12. I'•Attach any other application fern that has:•been completed-regarding "the pro-. • posal•z. if. none haS 'been:°completed „but 'is expected to be filed at sore future' ' date describe the nature 'of, SuLI, application form ' • I I . ENVIRONMENTAL 'IPMPJACTS' ' (Explanations of'.al..l..,"yes". ,and ".maybe" answers 'are _req'uired): • ( 1), Earth. Will the proposal result in! - ' ,(a) Unstable earth. conditions or ,in changes in geologic substructu'res? �. :. ' ," �' FES� - MAYBE •`.Nil • (b) .•Di•srup.tions , displacements; compaction• or 'over- ` covering of".the soil ? gi • YTS MAYBE• . f+iCi • (c) .'.Change ,in topography or ground 'surface relief . • features? YES IAA dE N (d) The ,destructio•n, covering or modification of any ' ` • :unique geologic or' physical, features?. . • , .YES P'ii, v - ;NO • • (e) Any increase in wind or. water erosion of s,oi'ls, '. • either on `or off the site? , .. (f) Changes :in deposition or :erosion of beach• sands, or ' : : , ' :,changes ;in: siltation , deposition or erosion which • ' may modify' the channel of a river or stream or the ` , a-; bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet„or lake? ..• YES •MAYBE' NO • Explanation: ' r • ' •• -3,, - • (2) .. Air. : Wi-ll " the ',proposal •result ,in :' , ' ' , , (a) _,Air emissions or deteri.oration.`or .ambient 'air . ' ' " • • • " • quality? , . . ;• :YES ,MAYBE NO . • ' (b)' the creation .of: objectionable odors? • • • - ' YES hYBE : mi _ .. '. ' • . , . • •(c) Alteration of •air movement, moisture, or. temperature, :, . - • • • - . ', or any change.. .in 'CI imate," either 1ocaily or , , . •• regionally? .. ' . • ' ; ' • ' ',.•. ' - • YES • MAYBE ' t 0 • :Explanation: ; . ,(3) .,,Water. .l'(i.11 ,the' proposal" result in . " . . . (a) : Changes' in currents; or the course of .direction of ' ` • _ water movements ,' in -either marine or "fresh'waters? `;: :' '. ` E :;• . '. 'YES' .MAYBE ' ho ' ::•-•(b), '.Changes in absorption .rates , drainage patterns •,-;'or. • _ the :rate',and. amount:of: surface, water-• runoff?'; .-• • ' • "YES °MAYBE .. tiU ` (c)"'.. Al ter"at:i,ons to the "Coarse`or.:fl'o; Of"flood waters?' (d) Change .in .the amount`.of surface-,"water."i.n 'any>.erater ' • _ . body? • ' , :. • 2^: •• : YES ilArBE' t,C. (e) . Discharge. in`to surface waters",`, or` ri• any ',alteration . •'• • ' surface water.qualit'y,. including :but not-limited tb- ' temperature, dissolved oicygen or turbidity? " • `�;. • _ : YES P•IAYE3E kO ' :•(f) r Alteration •of.,the direction or.•rate of;'flow of • • ' ground 'waters? YES MAYBE do.. • ` ' • ' (4) • Change in :the...quantity.'of ground waters., either • ' , through:.direct additions •or. wi thdrawal s ,`:,•or•-through:"':.:". - _ ' : - ; interception; of•;an.aqu,'ifer:by: cuts or excavations? "�. YE$'• . UI BE.. tiU . . ` (h} .-:Deterioratio•n'. in ..ground: "Water' qual i'ty',.:ei thee'. through , direct injection', or :through the 'seepage_`,of leachate,: :,:••,• '• : :' phosphates, detergents , waterborne virus, or bacteria; ."; _ ' ". •or other,:substances' into the' round•.waters?. YES t1�YBE . tdu . .(i ):: Reducti`on: in: the' amount of~wat`er otherwise available ',' .. ' for 'pub')public 'water supplies? . . . YES hA`:3E. N _ ,•l•.E x p l'a n a t i on. •?t:: ' 's • . . ,: :• • • " (4) Flora. . Will the proposal result in. - ' • • , (•a) Change in" the d,iversity -of,"species";'. or numbers' of any - ' species of flora: (•including tre'es, shrubs ,. grass., :crops , „ - • microflora:Jand•.aqu'ati.c '.pl ants)?:. , • - " . ,' ' - • t'i YES hi!T{3- . hi '.: (b);. 'Reduction' of the.-numbers- of any unique ; rare or. . . .. ., ' -- endangered species of flora?. . • ' a stiff . , ` YES MAYBE. NO ,. . • : (.c) ,. Introduction-of °ne,w'species• •of`•flora 'into an area",•�•or_'",•. •_ . • iin a'••barr.ier: to- the normal.•replenishment•or e.'isting'::. '; '.: • . species?' • " - - :. •- - .. YES MAYBE •NO . • (dr Reduction�"•in`=ae'reage ,of *any'. agricultural• 'crop? etoL : YcS ht YBE ' NU: ExPi'anation • • • (5) fauna. . Will the',pr.oposal result lin : - (a) Changes in• the diversity of species, or numbers of : . • • ` ' • any species of fauna (birds , land animals; includiinj ' reptiles , fish and shellfish,': benthic 'organisms , , insects or microfauna)? i`; . ' • ' : YES • FlAYBE NO (b) : Reduction of the numbers of any unique, ,rare •or.. endangered species of fauna? . " tt.;.; ' . ' YES' . , a';4' E i!0 , (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area , or result in a •barrier to the migration or :movement of. fauna?, . , • t Y't5 MAYBE NO (d) Deterioration to existing fish 'or nil•d1'ite habitat? • _ �_L YES MAYBE ..NG - Explanation:` '. • . , . . • . • (6) Norse. ` Will,.the proposal` increase existing noise levels? "• ' • ..YES MAYBE f'0 . . Explanation:. . . ; (7)' Light and Glare. Will .'the proposal produce new light or • glare? '; - �ES. piA $E t'd0� Explanation: . - • ,. . (8) ' .Land. Use.'„: Will the 'proposal result' in' the alteration of. :the '. • present or planned; land use of an 3 area(: • :, S P'lAY8E hG` Explanation • • • ' (9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in • - • • ) i (a) ; Increase in. the.°rate of .,use of. any natural'`resources?;:- • ••7'�� •- ' YES MAY e N0 (b) . •,.Depl.eti-on',of,of: nonrenewable natural resource? , . `; •,':;, ., : YES P'r Y3'E P!0L Explanation: ( 10) : Risk' of Upset. Does' the proposal :'invblve a. risk of.,an '.•, , , . • explosion or the release of hazardous substances' (including, . but not limited to, oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation), ' in the• event of an' accident or upset`conditions?' ^"{� . • • • • -MAYBE, `u YES Explanation: _ (11) Population., . Will .the,, proposa'l alter the• location, distri- • , . " , bution, 'density, or.growth rate of the human population_ of an area? .. • -. ,YES MAYBE NU .. •. .. Explanation: • ( 16) Utilities .-': Will .the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to. the following utilities : , .. -6 (d) Sewer or septic',. tanks? - '.. - , • , .. __ _ «s , : Y ES MTY B L ;LT ` • (e) Storm water drainage? , YES• MAYBE -NO (f). . Solid waste and disposal:? ?:.-* .. -. YES MAYBE HU ' E:xplenation. . (17) ` Human Health.,'. Will the proposal result in the creation of : any health hazard. or potential health hazard.' (excluding • • mental health)? _ YESMAYBE' . NO ' . .. Explanation: - ( 18)-.•`Aesthetics. ; .Will.::the 'proposal result` in the obstruction of • ` : • • any scenic vista or view open to; the public , •or will the ' proposal '.result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive ` site'open' to -public view?. s,K _ Y• YES MAYBE NO . Explanation • , . . ` ' . , ..' ••." ('19) •; Pe_cr"eatio_n;' Wi l'.l the; .proposal, result .i n' an impact upon ,the , t�? . .quality ,or quantity o'f..existing' recreational opportunities?• c , M . . YES MAYBE N0 ; '. Explanation ' - - . , ., :...,, . ,.„ (20) Archeological/Historical Wi11,•the,: proposal result in- an • " - .' ' alteration: of a. sig.nificant:"`arcoheological ':.or'' historical site,' structure, object' or •bui'1•ding? . ��''' _ . •,• •• ' YES'.'.': MAY[3E ,NO . ' - .. Explanation. - ; IiI . SIGiiATURE ; • " I , the undersig'ned.,"-state'.that. to 'the:best of• my- knowledge the above informatior<. is true .and. complete. , 'It is understood •that •the•.lead agency.may :withdraw any dec•la- `' , ' 'ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should , •,there be any.willful inisrepresentation •or willful: lack .of ..full , disclosure on my part • • • . ', ''•. Proponent (signed) •M1 o .'.e.3 L a Colt— ieatd en t •• (name printed) . . lit. Olivet Cemetcry Cor 7 a ' •C'i'ty 'o`p `RNr,tor. �l�nnir,gDepartment fi OF Rp 10 z THE CITY OF RENTON o MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 n ° BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 13:3 co 235- 2550 ��rFD SEPI��O� MEMORANDUM May 8 , 1980 TO : Warren G . Gonnason , Public Works Director FROM :7105 Gordon Y . Ericksen , Planning Director ,By : Roger J. Blaylock , Associate Planner RE : SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICATION, AMERICAN MEMORIAL SERVICES The Planning Department has just received an application from Mr . James Colt , President of American Memorial Services , for a special permit to allow filling and grading on an 11-acre site east and north of the present Mt . Olivet Cemetery . The existing special permit expires on Friday , May 9th . As agreed upon in our meeting of April 15th, the Public Works Department will consider the extension of the annual filling and grading license to cover the time in between the application date and the decision date of the Hearing Examiner. RJB ; sh { OF 1 ‘,/://1- z THE CITY OF RENTON .9 A MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH. MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 113 235- 2550 0,9"6D SEPO��P April 25, 1980 MEMORANDUM TO: Public Works Director • FROM: Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director BY: David R. Clemens RE: Mt. Olivet Special Permit, SP-034-77 We have just received a copy of the letter from the attorney for Mt. Olivet, and we have the following concerns: 1) The City Attorney has concluded that it is not possible to extend the Special Permit. The proposed new permit will provide for the "extension" if the Examiner approves. 2) It was our understanding that the extension of . the permit which the City would grant during the period of consideration of the new fill permit , was the annual license. It was not our understanding that the City would grantdthe annual license for the remainder of the year. 3) The proposed schedule for application by Mt . Olivet for a new Special Permit appears to be satisfactory. Your consideration of the above is appreciated. It would appear that a meeting of the effected staff should be held to assure that any action we take will be in accordance with or last discussions. dc:DRC cc: Mayor Shinpoch City Attorney ram..• o ic � fi1Q ✓r p 1 A • THEODORE H. GATHE ATTORNEY AT LAW 457 CENTRAL BUILDING SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104 (206) 682-0970 April 23, 1980 Mr. Warren Gonnason Public Works Department _u ; City of Renton Renton, WA 98055 Re: Mt.,;.,Ol vet Cemetery Special Permit ' ,' SP-034=77 Dear Mr. Gonnason: This letter is to confirm the agreement reached at our meeting on Tuesday, April 15, 1980. The agreement reached includes the following: • (1) The City of Renton will issue to Mt. Olivet Cemetery an extension of Special Permit SP-034-77, said extension shall run from May 8, 1980 until the Renton -City Hearing Examiner issues a report and recommendation approving a new special permit. (2) Mt. Olivet Cemetery will receive from the City of Renton Building Department the annual license covering the balance of this year. (3) Mt. Olivet will make application to the City of Renton for a new special permit prior to April 30, 1980 . The purpose of issuing an extension is to permit the fill operation to continue uninterrupted. We thank you for your cooperation in dealing with this matter. Very_ ruly Qurs, • ' <<L �- -til�•� Theodore H. Gathe THG:bn cc. Mt. Olivet Cemetery ^ ` "44,4 1 Stoneway Sand & Gravel Co. ktCtIVED Eradco, Inc. I.:- 2 1980 CITY OF RENTON eAJBLIC WORKS 4er.'P4 n / 4e', Orin/ ;n 1/ $17e ,' / ,&m1, • OF R4 ;M O THE CITY OF' RENTON C7 4® '. Z . MUNICIPAL BUILDING T00 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 F yM'rr ` cai BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH. MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT °4 • 235- 2550 o �Q A17 O sEP���� MEMORANDUM March 28, 1980 TO: Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director FROM: Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director RE: REQUEST,._FOR MEETING - SPECIAL. PERMIT MT. OLIVET +CEMETERY COMPANY' N s The attached is for your information. As Roger Blay- lock will .be on. vacation next week, and I feel his attendance is necessary, would you please advise when you and your staff might be available to attend the proposed meeting some time during the week of April 7th. Thank you. cc: City Attorney Attachment JAMES C.YOUNG TELEPHONE THEODORE.H.GATHE ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS AT LAW 1101 DEXTER HORTON BUILDING (206)624-6518 710 SECOND AVENUE • SEATTLE,WASH INGTON 98104 March 25, 1980 . %44. ;PirDltb Mr . Gordon Erickson 1 vAR 27 1S80 Planning Department City of Renton P . 0 . Box 626 • vr, Ye �".c ,Af 100 - 2nd Avenue Bldg . ��I,tir , ,`� , Renton, WA 98055 Re : Mt . Olivet Cemetery Co . - special permit Dear Mr . Erickson : In his letter dated March 13, 1980, Mr. Larry Warren, Renton City Attorney, suggested that it would be helpful to have a meeting to discuss the fill operation under special permit number SP -034-77, and Mt . Olivet ' s compliance with the conditions set forth in the Hearing Examiner ' s decision in this matter . I concur that a meeting with the responsible officials , including yourself, Mr . Nelson and Mr . Gonnisbn • would be beneficial . I would propose that we meeting on either Wednesday, April 2nd, Thursday, April 3rd, of Friday, April 4th, perferably •in the morning . I will endeavor to keep my schedule flexible to accommodate yours . Please call or write me so that I can confirm the date and time for our meeting . Ve truly y rs , Theodore H Gathe ., OF ! A. . .f. z THE CITY OF RENTON ,, MUNICIPAL BUILDING TOO MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH.96055 a ® rs" ' BARBARA Y. SHINP®CH, MAYOR o PLANNING DEPARTMENT 94 te 235- ?550 044'. SEP�E�O�P April 7, 1980 Mr. Theodore H. Gathe Young and Gathe , Inc. , P .S. 1101 Dexter Horton Building Seattle, Washington 98104 RE: MT. `OL'IVET- CEMETERY " SPECIAL PERMIT-. SP;-034-77 Dear Mr. Gathe: In correspondence dated March 17, 1980, the Planning Department raised the question of the application of the 14 co'nditions of Special Permit SP-034-77 to that area acquired by ERADCO to construct a road. Our office requested an opinion from the City Attorney concerning the possible violation of condition \\\\ #2 regarding the removal of materials from the site as a result of the road construction . It does appear that the roadway was not part of the fill and grading operation that Mt. Olivet had anticipated when it applied for the permit. Therefore , to correct the scope of the special permit Mt. Olivet Cemetery should request to remove that property over which ERADCO 's road passes. ii _- Please find attached necessary copies of the special permit application form. Since the area will be reduced, the old environmental checklist is still valid. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact this office. Very truly yours, Cord n Y. Ericksen Pla ning Di or • 1101/ '' /' Roger J. laylock / Associate Planner RJB :wr ✓ OF R,, 1 et b " z THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON.WASH.98055 0 cams BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 4 235- 2550 o -eo SEP'�E4e�Q, April 15, 1980 • MEMORANDUM • TO: Public Works Director FROM: Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director By : David R. Clemens, Senior Planner RE: MINUTES OF MEETING RE: MT. OLIVET CEMETERY AND PROPOSED ERADCO ROAD The following people attended a meeting at 1 :30 p .m. on Tuesday April 15, 1980 regarding the above : Warren Gonnason David' Clemens Roger Blaylock Larry Warren Ron Nelson Dick Houghton Jim Colt, Mt. Olivet Cemetery Ted Gathe , Attorney for Mr. Colt • Bob DeBoer, Stoneway Sand and Gravel Pat Easter, ERADCO Discussed in brief were the problems surrounding the concurrent completion of the Mt . Olivet Special Permit for filling and grading and the construction of the ERADCO roadway. It was noted that the Mt . Olivet permit would expire on May 9 , 1980, and would require extension . Also, the permit for the ERADCO roadway required approval of a Special Permit , if not constructed in accordance with the Mt. Olivet permit (roadway on an easement over the Mt . Olivet property) . Several alternatives were considered to resolve the problem of an extension of the Mt. Olivet permit, and to make the ERADCO road construction coincide with the Stoneway rezone application approval . It was concluded that: 1) The Mt. Olivet permit will expire and requires extension by the submission of a new permit. 2) The ERADCO roadway can only be constructed in accord- ance with the Mt. Olivet permit. N • Page 2 ' Warren Gonnason April 15, 1980 3) ERADCO may construct the road at their own risk until such time as the PUD approval requirements of the Stoneway rezone are complied with. At the conclusion of the meeting, Mr. Colt indicated that they would be submitting a new special permit, and that they would also request that the construction portion of their current permit remain in force until such time as the Examiner acts upon the new application . The City Attorney and Public Works Director indicated that they would consider such a request. ERADCO discussed their concerns related to the PUD approval (estimated to occur early in 1981 due to the EIS preparation required) , and its relationship to the roadway. The Planning staff indicated that until the PUD is approved, that the roadway cannot be considered as acceptable access to the ERADCO (former Stoneway) property. Any roadway construction would therefore be at the risk of ERADCO in that the access may not be approved as proposed due to environmental or other problems. The meeting closed with Mt. Olivet proposing a new application and a request to allow continuing operations until the Examiners decision on the new permit. ERADCO indicated that they would consider whether to continue work on the roadway in .accordance with the Mt . Olivet permit requirements or halt work until the PUD is approved. DRC : do / cc : Mayor Shinpoch Mt . Olivet file ' ERADCO file • 1\ OF I °D "`'' ' OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY o RENTON,WASHINGTON C.) 41% ' k�k O POST OFFICE BOX 626 100 2nd AVENUE BUILDING • RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 255-8678 sal :r; 0 alma LAWRENCE J.WARREN, CITY ATTORNEY DANIEL KELLOGG, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY 04, ��P April 2, 1980 SEP1 k '•_o. TO: ROGER BLAYLOCK, ASSOCIATE PLANNER FROM: LAWRENCE J. WARREN, CITY ATTORNEY '' rl RE : AMERICAN NELXDRIAL SERVICES SPECIAL PERMIT Your memo on the above topic was received March 25 , 1980. In your memo you express a concern that Mt. Olivet cemetery has granted an easement to ERADCO, while Mt. Olivet ' s entire property is burdened with a special _permit, and that special permit contains condition No. 2 against removing existing natural materials from the site. ERADCO' s private roadway necessitated grading and removal of material. You asked if that is a violation of the Mt. Olivet permit. Please be advised that removal- of material is an obvious violation of Condition No. 2 which forbids such removal. However, the roadway would not appear to be part of the fill.and- grade operation that Mt. Olivet had anticipated when it applied for the permit. If Mt. Olivet should make --� the appropriate application to the City to remove the property over which ERADCO' s road passes , then the City should delete the conditions of the special permit from the roadway property. It would appear, however , that it is encumbent upon Mt. Olivet to make that request, not for the City to do it spontaneously. If you have any further questions on this matter please feel free to contact me. aWitettLe (4-12--zA__ Lawrence . Warren • LJW: ds . cc : Mayor, Pres . Council, Public Works Dept. 1 . .. . . . . . . . . . . 4 7 -5P-04/ c60 , - . . , ... i • . • ,,../e,/ mie-I co e:-;ie v A/- Alo 7-es ,_ •'• ' A - . _ • . . . _ . , . • . • - . , 1 pre,1//0/e, ,,, , ,...7z,,,,7 A ja-7e2- . _ .-..., . . . . . . . . dA11 4OU'rprO(4 I Cle, . . - r - . . • '. . . . . . • . • . . . . : . • Z. CaPf7:2151AA/Cit 4.71"e-'../0",t..iejeler.1714A.44 /C-,7/74/41''')P e"'I#'7 cLu""7 is:y.4 . . iy,7,„ ii //, 1 • \,..n\ .., . • , . . . . . • • • - : • ..._ • . . . e _ ......- / - 1 - . . . 4. sA,...., :m.elki,,,c..,--/-.;,—••••• •s-A,,,,,-,'44-1-a-AL 414.."'S"i •- . . . / _./---:-. • @,...1 a l'i,eA,) . . . ,..... . . . • \ . . .. • \\N---,•• --- --_ —/ - '' . :. \ .. . . • . - . • ...>--1 •, . ., r,f..,,,.0 i I-IN,ITS . - ---;•-. ::- . . . .....Mow.= - •;• • . • • . . • Pr,-_'E-,LT I . • . • • . Plaintiffs LAMM PI 1" . . . . i N • . . • -. • . . I • a-. :._.e.- '___J.-,,r---,.: - r ' ! : ":" ti,F.A.:E e' 111 • cEmETERy - . . . , .. .. : , . . . 1.17 C..,•'FT :5 ....,. _ . . . MT• . OLIVET .. . , . : , • . . ' \ \ .. . „ :. , . • . , , ., ,, . .. .. . , • . " •, . , • i . mom Cfr.INT.WASHINGTON. , • 11 \ ill I. " ,- . , . . , . . OCT 5 1978 . i milimaimm * - . " • - ili..........co.:.er...... / t ' •. . • ' • I 0 MACY M.HOS , ..i, • . - ,.._ . • . -I- • i \ 1 ' . - \\ . . . . _ , . . , . ,_ . - .. •, ... . . . , _ . . • • •_,.,...i0 - • •,.. ..,,•• i ., - - . i ---:--Ett--.; .w------:---7----'`' • . --;-.7,7-zr.-.-.---- 5.:• c.,P A'1 FEt... 1 . J 1 - ' - - . - , • . • ... •;.----- . :. -, .,:,,..--. : \ \ - .,,-------1;-.!------ ; • ' ' • '-'. r-. ':-.-• ..:.: ,... •• , : "--; . . . . -- \: . • ' , .'".6. RE/1-17' : - - . - - •., • . . . - • • ...- .• . . • . . . . - . VICINITY MAP . . . " • ;! (1 ..--‘.. cirgIV_b ,--.• • . . . scALE i t..400 , -\ 4:e;,..- - • . „.: . (..) . ., ..., . , . .-,1. T.:. eocirrop•. • . 2,2. 196j • 1 t • 7, - toiha 0 8eNro, • . - , . - sE.? ., ••- •,- *4 Pp ,,,,„,. , , . . • . . .. • • L. . . • . . .t . t - . - :....:...... ,//,• • : - • . . . . . -•D . • , 1 . .6 ----';''''--''' • . • c., , Dot .4•11,3,...°;SU,)..cc,„ • . • . • . . . . - . . . . . . •••......&.1110 :::.--.,,,...1,E li.,4:4. " --2-1. .. !- - • : . . .- • i . .:11.!A• V,',. ( . . EArc . . . ' 'ATER---.---. b•-"/ 2? • -.'.017.4, . ellit0 ;--------• ''---. • • - -.. • . A,G e'd , ge....“..-----, . .- ' • . . - 1 . . •' . . . ,aiiii :t4-4 *-e•04/4,1e5 . . . . • . . ... . _ . . , . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . OWNER JAM ES COLT . . - .. • . . . . . . • • • • AMERICAN MEMORIAL SERVICES INC ; . .. . .. z . . P. O. BOX 33850 . •. - . • . . . • . .. . ....,-r,----.....*;. SEATTLE , WA. . 98133 - . .. . . . .. • . , , - -,`-,----;,... ;--;•,--'cc . . : . • 'T-3 -....?z_. csA\ d • . . . . . . . . .. . _ • . ..„,„ „c,....:,,,, ...... , . • • : , .• 1% .. • , ' s5"3/03alt .:- • - . . ..• MAR 4 198° • • . ! • . . .. . . • . . . . . • . . . , . . . . . . • MT OLIvET CEMET;;:_4.1 DEVE.1 01-VIENT . • . ... . - • . •. Tn-LE AWE; V C.'.',`.111-11 MA7 ' . . • . . . • Bk111,1)Vis ONIS'ICIII ' . .. . SCSI,:I - i • M • ' *MOM: situ nA nc. - . .--/ a......te , . • BATIC MAR 'ti P-7 MCKIM CI PIIIICT IIIIIIIIIIM . 'lust'. • OONESHVAR & ASSOCIATES 11"1" 'lust'. . • 0 -- t 2..1.0-0::,) ..:; 1:2) 4000 AURORA AVE.N.SEATTLE.O. i C.);- 1- . . _ . , . . ...., _ .. -__ . - ... .. . _ ._. .__--7.--, . ' j ., , .. • S�-O�f 7 - d �"GNA l�M`�1-- _ - - - . „.- ->/"...-_ ____,..____>--,/ 7.--7./. --..,„-------... -- ‹--____. . . '77 7 UNPLATTED , �4900 .404-4't•1 \ •y ,J' r. • / i U..SB9^J O.K < < ' • (7 -/ r ; ' •• „/ ./ , i z. ,./. .• .-' et,' _ . 7- Wave el ---- -9 . ri . etss::40.1:414::17N°44040:01'77.0„-4,,,-x",i,4"1 . . . . .. ..... 1 i ' . - .„-- - . . / FE] • dr • - - - j ,- ass . 1 . C MONT_FtEY T 1 • • \o - L.L.; L' - ERFIA C \ �� • Ca • • , . wi . . , , . • . . • . - CO , "` r MT. OLIVET CEMETERY • • . _ _ I I ,_� •-'fir-.J -�•:j ' . • / // / . 1 1 I. L�II U L •1 / • MAR 4 r.'"::r 1•' . 198(1 CONTOUR` INTERVAL _ .'"Q`Ft=:ovatcr us:. ics ' Ur,:,a bl 1j �; MT Oi_l';'= CLUE.-TERsi GE'/"-C•''tIt_'.•1 / / . ' I � [ff4E=MIA" P �i`)r7i'7 f��.[-t-t 1:::::: F�/ i [[[Ir / NEI. t[[llET [[rfEI: DONESNYAR & ASSOCIATES [[fru • - �' - - r ED 4000 AURORA AYE.R.SEATTLE.YEA. 3 • • SP-Oy -80 E ` • I� —�oo • E 210 g - 41 ,o1.,p,Stral % • • A 3'S2/0 3es � " �s . - • • 5 z„o • • z9s f • • zso • 243 - ' F' _ , • - 1. :211:. .: ".' . : : . 3es + finP hp���/1 - 724. 50 (c bP p\ z� S U'• kU\,rl _ • • Gb CI 3.10 - • • zso.2o G• boo • • • • : \ \ no • • • • 4 Ali • • ZSo • 1v_(�1 Oi•; . •i 1r- ;I '-71--Jr7=1---)17::7'0 2a0H ('\c 14% oa - 4,FfN yt tic' • • • MAR 4 19. . 270 1- 1)1.111 I�1l�l3 [)f / J�IIJiY �4 AIL C1•�{(� i ' UC'/ � - r Ni'� _. aoIT - - ,-:. COZ.--..".k..z • *CALL' APPROVER p•• ... COCCUS: • • • muter lltnt�: ID DONESITYAR & ASSOCIATES r BIAIIAC tullltl: 2 70 -)ry - 4000 AURORA AVE.N.SEATTLE.WA. 4 �- / s ;;I � ,1�'"` �iv��1 /'/" r. • 7 �`� ��t�#� p J '�sire \ �(Nccrlu4/ryn is _ ��1I1 :2 .; A.• : F o1f'ytliit t,LQ v FT S v �_ �p!�❑ r• __1 \ s. .0 `[�t. / Ol/ly0 p R I've IVlii!\ 10� M l 1t W r i • • , //lLxi E43EA+ENr $ �T co 7'veii s , l iii�N �= - r r- `` 1 �Y °C�� r I{I ^,, i MoafeIt i esv?J 13 J Lur f >;i I V 1, ,l1,; fii_,......t.A,ice °I met" ?l1 I K • - _.ae�s.�._\/�l -.. — f,[c it.2 �Q•DZ•2S�• e• 4lnr • ..�` 4. . fi j � 'Li C• • 1 „ ^______ it'1 Lf.�Ril,L(y J7NY ,i, v �K e2. I. 1 l s1 1 ! ,.eii,e, -,assomm,41".". * .4M4,;Aap * ---„.;,...;,"5 , 4,,,;-7,-;,f;.... ,,„.6„..r r; ; „o• allanall ..,,71 • rial, r Le \ ALL • . ` ��, _ \ %i. TAPAf CUT Jt 4 t ,/LO I i 'lla i• lAt Of fill. ' . .d•Wpi i• ------ ---, ,..,„•:.411, . 44. ) r; 1 •I 5L2:, S'.✓uLK • a Of F(L C;a( 9. •C 1 ti c;s• • r" R�et ts(.( // \•'`:. . { I ,�tvfA Li+t' ; " _._ �- - � iE�::r /•E u>/a `,_�>�_ _�� PRIVATE ROAD �EDMONDS AVE N.E.) Ste P Aposto of • �� S24•7G'SAY SAZPG'--- p I i 1•�d. �. �:'� -�29/a � I D i ' Il� Jll 'TG�• � tE pEJlle , L. t .. y ¢f4' 79.2•A VF Sc,it:/ © �ryF - r1 • ,� „ II II II II II _O.r.• cree45o•- 94- 39. / S0p °�(C .. �I��1 TYP.a f4vEL s xwcoftW .� CEo tQ q,rER' : M IN OF /.L<IOQ.fao / cow` f ,i(/•'/1 Ic4�tt \ k W - i fC .TE/7 q4C /.; ' PSP cr >w / ,/ / �,lfz,• ; TfPf y V/C/A//TY MAP (v0.r- _MEfAC 6W 7rPl 4Er NIUG / '/ ' R:NL L',- WW ' i "WALL•SEESNEEr'fAfOE4lL$ ?E• l• _ __-- __-- \ �nO�. r. 2Eby T // �. fS floc _ �cL�' R n�•. c,7 tC SFEc[f(ca fi s �: �z G°2 !� rc.[rr:/ —�R r > tr LC - E5• / c•�„� � NnT� 4T P•CnNc'.[uRC CUT>ER \� - .. . _ i . -r• 6 / ,' - 512E of WATER A!A!4(WlLL7E ^: 3(OEW4LK , • \\ l ' 2s--a-t OETEkM(NEO 3y C!r1"Of.QENfr1+/ w +v _• /f•e• 54' - % ' GO'EASEMENr FOR F'Re 0E4144054S REOU/4•EO .1`„F.,, me Of FILL - \ - C:A-F Gy„�}A„ f02 EIA/Ac PLA./5 eF au.o• a a' - , wick (PCANve moo WV:) raw]:afarN 5'C:47fd LY1K ! dACKOFCi'1.VCCURtS PLAN -HYORO-SEE/)ALL eXPO5E0 ••• CLASSA•45Po.Chvc. f 5u4e4ces aurae f/cc secnays) • 27. 27r. Z� - r-tey_ 1 G . - • L .1 . ' ..", N` 2 ecr4,Pr.otwp ce. (h >"u.CO$HDT arore C 51E'F4CgC roP MOVE • SU.(F4CMJC TOO C&J 5L - ' / - SAl7taDER-fAST s(DE mg-. 2L•41(A:CONK.OEPRI Cr.SCitt4CMJC44sE Coast' cF.H- QCI77✓E2T. _ Cue 1 GuJTE2 L 255 • - • (►Lsr c/o w r) { ` i i .. .•-L• I { i I - ! Nn rE✓EC 6ASf CLR55 4.47A 9E I ; i I o 1: :,, :w� 1{ I ; i ; eaou,:eeo PEuo�uc sac uxr ars i MAIN EnlTR? �Q4 1 J/O SCALE .' i i f I I ,p. 4„!: p ZSC} - Z�(S-� 1 I I 29n' 4 d- Pt R j I ! 1 i i I I 1 1 - 1 h ` • -:�` - i ' • ,,• .. 2'C r..otorN ce 2-COMPr.OoirH :m v ; I I 1 . I I (1 245:I ..2�.5 i I t .?I 1 ` `•.. 100•'.V.0 •i ' f /1 ( • { I tl 5u1f4 '•�✓lcnuRSE I c CW SS h•ASPu.CO NC. ENT _ i 1 1 I %OW' 4-&M r 5.0E ON[+' r1 ! t, _ 24� • { 2�� i { i tie Zi I ?; .. '.` i.',, ^i • ✓ 1 n 1 1 ' I I ( 1 1 1 1 1 t'Ib WANE COMM:OEPR/[L. Vel I '1 11 3 - ( - I 1 1 I t - i ' SO(fAC.VG TOP t { 1 :C Rl :`.�m : e :m A.° '.<::1•''.' r27C.ht •�. i ! t i ('t 1 1I • ,7`. 02•AMV COMPf.OEPrNGZ S(•ZF4c/NG CEMENT CONC.✓EP.j I \' a i : v c\ .tv N .N.. ........ ::':.. :.� _`' 1 { • 1' i '�A ... , I / p4SE COURSE Cucb[Gu77'ft , 1 ! Z 5 ' .::2:7� 1 — i....�'! 275=i _ (wc Sr SmE Mgr) ti ,... 111 i i I 1 I .._.. \. ......e9.5 .. 5G7":- .:j...i....\£r(15TPAVCQ'.04O j tAP:I 1 1 i TYP. ROAD SECT/nN .. 5. j I I i • lI :l ! i ;/ I I an suiCE • i / ii I I I ! 1 .... 'i , I ,� I 1 030:1 ..:2-7O { I i �'L ' 216 • - { \ti i I 1 i • I I Vb.5qo... i i I! 1 �• • •' - i / • 1 i .. i`().. .1 I - 1• I ' ! t ' I. 00vf.9,OIA.DCR I NI �\... .. i > 1 1... •2 25:1 ..:76 ' I 1 •i ; ! I (...Z_G __ - N I ryh•c.':�'NI,i o. ! 1 ' I 1 1 { • I I ; - L •I I ... --- .aN::: e.:\oti i • I . • I • \ 1` ` �! 1 ///� I .�.�.� I 1 1 1 L ZG � ` IN 2 LAYERS 1 t 2SS0_`_+ - ! - lP.LLS RANGING FROM A"TOY • I 1 { L 1....-ren':Itc \\ ( �y I I i j �' ' ::.' 1 ! ��` ! 11: i I ' I • : , 'I • I TYPICAL SECTION 1 j \ ! �> I I I r :::{ • \ -.k I I• ,; t • ROCK PROTECTED ROAD DITCH . .... .-..... r .........1...-\ •.-- y•-•• •1� s ..• •••.• .a • •.1h I • FOR 4ENfR4L N47E5 B SPFC/F/CRT/[M1S SEE SHEET A2 j j 1. i ! I . -"I----- I I I —I p / 2 • 3 4 r ¢ ., S me•• v.c G . 7 • - G • 1 REV.NO. DATE DESCRIPTION MADE BY CHECKED REV.NO. DATE DESCRIPTION - MADE BY CHECKED SCALE ,/' 'L•!`� JOB NO. 77475 '��''J °L°r , PRIVATE ROAD EXTENSION SHEET IUGH G. GOLDSMITH and ASSOCIATES INC. _ DRAWN �� .- �r� I -� • DATE ( EDMONDS AVE N.E. ) IVIL ENGINEERS PLANNERS LAND SURVEYORS _ • APPROVED° i ��• ROAD AND STORM DRAINAGE 2 01 LYON BUILDING SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104 622.1080 FIELD BOOK, Al •t, „,t�`r • PLAN & PROFILE dT'.g'Te 2Av[sloEor2y4040s>Aafs$CUL✓E.cfsit( Owl PAGE CITY OF RENTON WASHINGTON SP-041-7-7d 2zr. -- ► _... ..... t' 4 ..._.,._—.. / 24I� 2Z4... . ...1 .... .. .. .. ... ......... ......... ......... ........ ... .... ......_ ( 1 /¢:. :Zc:y.. / ;z Cy i • .�;... ......... . i � � 2s8 2G_G i A\ f/ - . • :. .. .. .... . 5. tom_ —. --- -- ?` %' 3 9G / 1......... ... ::.. ::�,v- 1 2 C, 646I. 11 i-i �� \X / \I ! i I r \ \c I ::.--. ••••\... r........................ i { / � ( I 2S( � I i i ( , f � ..... f. —� I f r ( _ f ! - • :_.• • • { ¢ � �s�i i I 2 I ( c+.0r�) f 1 �n s I . .:.....: • \ I • I I ; • - i I I PIO I1 I1t ` } { f ! 11' . 1 i I 5i I ..... : ...... \A ��1 1 .......-- - .. . .23 6 I I 274 062 I \ J ?i& y l : • I •,, .. .... ... .. . ..:.:.::: --- { I { .._ . ... . ::::::::.:. I 23 ?at, y e Z54 t I l 764 5 I : : in 4t :• • Gt9G __. Z52 I . REV.NO. DATE DESCRIPTION MADE BY CHECKED REV.NO. DATE DESCRIPTION MADE BY CHECKED SALE �':nR1z'/••20 ,.'OE NO. 7747 req/: r•� G,Go(ps� pRivArF Rl/qD EX r� NSION SHEET DRAWN 1 �/y� Jct N V HUGH G. GOLDSMITH and ASSOCIATES, INC. DATE 1 =-CIVIL ENGINEERS PLANNERS LAND SURYEYDRS APP10°fD` s % CROSS SECT1nNS SI[P `,\ 501 LYON BUILDING SEATTLE, WASHIN6TON 98184 822.1080 EIEwBOOK l •• ` /.l,.u[0\ PAGE I 2 SP-c)-4/-7 `SO . .-, • - 302 JOG,. _ c . t t�R 3.6z. { I • t a 296..... • / •� . ......... ..�/ ` -.y .-":17.7. :.1:1}7:f7H V ':L,.:.1j!:7:'. • \- . ......1. 7.6G 224. / • \ 204 -Z5er- 1 , ..,_;11 .. : ..;..). .• .. ..,. ` / • , • / / 11 .. .. .. .._ / ......... .. .. iss I i , .:i::.•: F::::, ::: ......::: •.,.•... 1 1aH.} S:{:{'ii i;:!:4i►::: ' r; :.. . ,� : : H 1 I , • • " ,�. 0 ..... ?G :+' F. ,. r 26Z' 28G • .. 344I.0.:: ...... 24.6 I5 ;i T F \ 1 .( :9± o.) P'2 . 2 2 Z ' 262 ,2 ' ':704-50J. • . �`y _ • 1 4"-1/4 / • Jr--I ? Z`m 270 � i i 3dG...... 1. . _... 3i�G • I . i \ / `\t ! 26G 304 •- 302 t ::.. :... .... ...:..... 36e... , / . I r A 1.. .::: :::: :: ? 1. 1- "_ I 1 I I f ? ( 1Ic.t-X. I III; I I -,:: ......... .........1 .X. I s.- I 27 f 2 94 'i ` I I { { 296 I I I . • —G ; / t.. Z a •1. i i I \ ...I i ? I T ? i I ( I I \/t iz.9! I I I . ! I ! . _ ; %. f ! 1 •I i �11,- 3 • I I ? ? { of — —� I + 2T !....._... ... 4a® ... ► ? sr¢ t H 1 l Z9o:. 1 • ... .... !, I . , —t 31 .I •i f 41:50. I I \ tf _�—� t ( i i.. ... ,ti... 3Z;� ..�. 111/ 1 ! G6 4- t , 28¢'► 3: ' 'trfi .................. ...... ....... • • i-.. ZG2::: It / , ? t 3 \ . ... ... ...... (- _ ... ........ ........ ..._... I 4 P4 746 ` ?rr� H. -30? I r 362 /• I li ff I / I I I � I ( ( i I `...-r; : .... ....I ... ... .• -•- -- -•--•---- •----.--•! / 1 i ,20 1276 ( I I t 276=.1 =298= a ( 1_-2-9E I• { A /6 I , __ZI • \ t !\• - 2c, I .276 1.272 `- , 1 I-.272'•- -2-9 4 •V 3.;3'. \ 2`�2 ` ,F:::: // i /0i 29.! I { ; �, i 1 I (=-/fctC ) I \ / 1` I --- .7z Ili . Z90.' .S. 29Q \i f/ I L � . —ZZ 6- t--- —.-----, \ i 2.66' I _rt,7? ... zap ! (-........ ......... ...... t REV.NO. DATE DESCRIPTION MADE BY CHECKED REV.NO. DATE DESCRIPTION MADE BY CHECKED SCALE KY'T1t= r••�: G I,OIo- e- JOB NO. J747.5 ver: r.a pR1v4 rE ROAD EX TENSION DRAWN , !w,• - \'.-�.� - , SHEET HUGH G. GOLDSMITH and ASSOCIATES, INC. DATE _ CIVIL ENGINEERS PLANNERS LAND SURVEYORS ®APPROV , f -i ` 501 LYON BUILDING SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104 622-1080 .7 FIELD BOOK y*`' - CROSS SEC lI O N Si PAGE , • 114. 244 - - 1 Y t t 7440. t °:::: • At I znG, q .... �'\ Pad -'�^"_ r)..Y.9.Gy::: ... ` NJ I / F = Z52 -' / 1— // I "� .,,1 • got 3 a�%;' l /. oaf z4a zz ss. / ,e 241 N. Z24' , i ��'9992-1., • N. 1 s` I `.j•eSer1 ` -' I I I ; 1 �' I ; 1 1 I i ' I 1 LT s (• 4l SLKId / L 151fi�� i1,:::. REtRtK� G kVgtt' i IYI N ii.•. . 1 i. hra.cv. I....\ -• am " AR, ,, _ I I�' i ., , J i L I i ,} 22 o1,y:on5n: !a' • ' i tE.o. REV.NO. DATE DESCRIPTION MADE BY CHKKED REV.NO. DATE DESCRIPTION MADE BY CHKKED SCALE NoRRt1: r•21. • ":•• • JOB E HUGH G. GOLDSMITH and ASSOCIATES, INC. DRAWN 'rF *" + ��`' o�os� PRIVATE ROAD EXTENSION SHEE t DATE , _ 1. /� F •� ^ S CIVIL ENGINEERS PLANNERS LAND SURVEYORS APPROVED, •y la � � �F R`/S 5 5 ^- C / l l/ N J 501 LYON BUILDING SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104 622-1080 FIELD BOOK: 4 'r•t •`F 1 4,4 4vvWSEO fV/TL(c 0 c 40E51 CU[vi.CT sae AW PAGE , i 4[.wt`�• ' • he 1 -, 31Z .- - i . . .... .... ......... JQJ� ...... ,. ... / 1. 1,. . i-. i 300— ` l 300 30G I ` E � \. _, \ ,.1—L • Z gG it r A --- -- • --"--r 2% 3Ei4- t.-: ... . .:{ ... ... ... ......... ......... ......... ........ 304I .� ........ !3.rn0): I k. ‘�-?;g2C y. 1 I — t _ 30 �` I13r79 . ` ♦ I ,. i Ir ( \ i 14444 H. 30� ! l \ i 320 l4` 29 ) \ -(I l / j 1 I c'7 U� ( ! _ ! \:::1:. . e , k -- -- \ " .316 \. i / \• glib ( I i Vic-- ` i ! 3 ? / - /&79:I..ter— �,.J /1 ; : : ( ! i 1 I" I I � I.. ... .. 3-14 I ? ! 1 s I �364- I { ' I ! I ( , I 3i2 .i ( ! i ! ( ( I ! ' ! 1 , ! ! I ! ( I I (.... . �: 0t7Y1� I I -r • I i . 306 l i ... ! , i 396 i I f I^ T - I.. .... . . .. 1 . . ... (1';1-4-/nail - I it i -i 186 j REV.NO. DATE DESCRIPTION MADE BY CHECKED REV.NO.1 DATE DESCRIPTION MADE BY CHECKED SCALE Nodi7. / IO i�. JOB NO _ -YE.ZS" �'•.• P R/V 4 rE ROAD e X TENSION S IO N HUGH G. GOLDSMITH and ASSOCIATES, INC. DRAWN 3 "K�" G.s:" sNEEr DATE , JV`Z` w�y"t , CIVIL ENGINEERS PLANNERS LAND SURVEYORS APPROVED: �_ + ,, _; ^LION BUILDING SEATTLE, WASHIN6TON 98104 622-1090 FlEEDBOOK: s •.13 - •'� CROSS SEC fl n"5 PAGE 3 4442 T�r S P- 04i 7 — $d - • - • • - CITY OF. r Ei\-: I 'C,`i • • ID 4 ( `'n` _ • • C 4 �' PRIVATE R: 'j \\ 7=- F`43'7 C�• _ B U1., ,-r- wi_ t v Of CONSL f�4- -Qlw - F - FV .1 _o W _ �� W -:2 Z- N• u f/LL II` 6 �� Aru ;' SC(t / h �h A�� yr rYP cANC,cuR6, C N 34•E, SL, /S'2t1 GUTTER¢l1nE�'ACK a4CKAfWALYCOIN[/DES, C} A GR - y(i /.' - ,/ ^ ME of(ILL le I�y�521. / I,I w/TH t4SEMENT cIA%Ehl TE �o�„ 5 o 40•ESM'f �,�� r TAR Tr P.ROAD secticw „F w ATQ(v4c.v4c vE , (1 • Q ��j0 A pM z+44.50- SEE SNEEr'L `�`,- 4T WON Pf.AF CIrJF_ 5� 'Sf G" . 2J"& —r L Ca,//3i5/AIQ SPECt/JCRT/nUS xt.194•85' Jv�Ie Hof aAAo 69•G2• - •Erato-seeO ALL Ex A15ED • •ALL WORK 1m4Tlt14LS waLi de IN 4ccoaa4Nce KM-4 1NE� 1 45.71 SLOPES (CUT oR FIu SK1/a/S) - CUS>tA[7/Os/ IsN:/aL/T•'J/IrGNW4YS.ST4V ten S/EL'/FICAT/ANS OR ROAD . _ 1 ST7 CTCOr • :ONST'C1/CT/ON(C41ES7 E0,7ANJANO SUI31ECj 10 /NSPFG7/AN �� �� . a✓A[eYTNE C,lr q REM/ON • _— 3/A _ 61NG5/44LL 6E OLWSTRGCT20/44GCORMNCE W/T4>RA OE of _ . - P LAN - - . - 303 �>•A- - - —- Sy4N0440 PCA,V-ryPE 2 t VIAL 6E PL41Nc4LY4N/160 ANO I p� ` M E.�o �txF---'� I �".. z7. I 2>; 77.• Fugue flcL OM 4GE5 4s sPdGIFI40 lot fypLt.(SEC7/0U,5-27.31 S"GE - 3 GRADING Of GE1fiTER! - 205 SHA[E 6E IN 4000 O4NClz W/r11771E Paovis/0 S OF SECTION z-093(r)E. OL�V E , • lwuuc EEPANsa1Q IU!HE 1NlE4/OR OF fNE 6/NS a oEgiNo fE W4CL SN444 6E PtACAOIN M1• _ •• 1 ,CAMPAC,,E0 PLO\ ¢faP2n(E.nAVIS .1 • AN sit 6J INCHES THICR E4CN Lq YER SHALL 6E - - L8O I EC L4YE4S NorMatE 71/ G - _ _ . . - • /atsr ���— 1% ¢ '•" •2�PJ/A,4F orEme rS Is 9N0 COMPACFEO>A 957.Of THE grga/4iUM OEArSty qS OEfE4Mr.VfO ,. ,• t65 \` J comp/Cr/ON CANTta[TE57-1v SEC1'QN Z-05.5/14)0. - - ``` - /. - 2617 'UG6EHWOTHEW4CCSN4LLPROq ESSW/TNTEEFI[UNGOPvie6/NS¢544CL 5 •/ \ 'O • C E. / ^ A' ^ - SCOPE RIGHTS ACLTCl/RED :4RR/EO A4E90 Of 6/Nf/LL • r _ J l I N 1[T/ Wif 1 EASEMENT ' • PIPE SN4CL46 PORfU(4TEo AND ItM41 de RS6ESTos GEMrNT,CONCRETE, - _ • - :E0 Abhq,4ACYANrzFO CO¢4UG4TE0 IRON OR STEEL OQ CORRQCAfFOAt(IMIM/M I .... -,.. .. .,.. -- �,I. ........ ... ... r R ^,IS O C - 4 ( I I ( I ( I ( :: ' - I I ( GeJvERAL AlOrES SPEC/F/ / I !....... 1 I i 14C4FICL FOR l4E 6/NS/OR4/NS 5441 9 6 45 3PfC/F/tP/�lel/041.9-0W - , .. .. ........ ..._ f L _ - I I _ 1 -I 1 I E ' ALL woRK TO 66PGPF(JRMEO L M4TER/ALS TO 9E U520 SN4[L 6E JN4CCnRLWNCf IN/FN PIE • ' I I I t i k I \, --- "j i / i 305'! ! { AP.W.4.,19775OITIOV Au0SM4LL 4f Slr6JEC7Ta'aspect-Ou,APP•tol-EE 4Yr4EoilyOA-REN I''�^c • ._.1`L J I frov •` i 1 1 ` 2:STREETS I 1 I 1 t i I , I `y)5:_ 1.. ' : •: . .._ -,......^_ I V I I 1 (4)>NE R040W4y SECT/AN 45 SugAfe 15 4 4E1+:i4UM REQUIREMENT.PE4/D/N6 4 sons DNES7/c41101/ • ? I 1 I I { „p. ,I. - ( ..! 1 - •• /i V ! ( I A001TrON41 645E MAfEQ/4L 4VIT 6E RfClJPEO ( I+ ! + 1 I '7' I .. - �- I.... �.- .. _.--..-..!....3 _ (4) 506GRAOE CONSTRLCT10N SILL 1S:L4'ACCcS]u'CE WITN52crieN IS a.PW.4.5f4NDga9 SPECS_ • 4 I { i - + • - GY • .i��.. - •v t i CAnPAC11AN SIMLL4Ef095?.4`x.fX:e. ..Y95.EiTY AS 4L45URE0Iv.ICCA447NC< W4J �/ •- C i V. h v - - p •�, w4, C2enc1C4'•D4/0 5116eRADE.CO{YP4CTInN 6Y AN 4PPMVE0 L ••• I i - I 1-"-'----I......�k: ( f �.... Iv ...� c ( ` 3,1SECTraU/3- IOES.A.P ( M19. t - ( C'• i`}:::O p I: c' ::c!^.--,n c A• :: ::,i 6- 4 sn 1 I I SaC7 t or iiG C46ARATosy•aif 3E REQUIt50 i ,, • I I i. - - 1•- I :(C)CRuSVED RACK TOP I EASE CAU45E PER SECf/oU 23 4.P.:c(4 S1RU/YV40 SPK•S, • y1 I E 1 �q!1• ...;. . � I ( .+: �` .' v I ... .. `.. f..::�95 {Iy:l�I . 125 I ' I .: - , tt I I I .. 3_ S(nEn4LK5 - _ ' I' ! i • 1 p i / 1--- '..i'''.''' ' i ! I.. .._. j.... (co TEE 51newA[K 51IAli.9e 5'-n1 MTUM T-CC-y!sS I sptIc yE GANST4t[TEn m1terato4ATE • J Ii I ( r A1F _', ._9... ( 1 // i.... _.. ....... 1 I �� �...., �r//fH SE[fON 2e 4/?N,4 574Nr.4RO SPECS. - 5_ . ARI ` i ! l�LOP { I ! 1 _ -:::'_-`r5 ( i ' ...` ....♦ i-t i I 2}1] i.b) VIE CA�YCRE7f M1,(foe S/OEx4LR SN411 6`A:4P.YL4.5ECTION e7 CLASS 5(/4-)WITK i I FILL 5 VE MA1�1AL I�C Q ( _' I I i _1.:.' ! - ; I y/ I ' i ( ( 1 I N I-J ( w4TEQ CAvfENf RA7L0-V0T TO ExCE7 175 GA[,E 4 4Ut/+IdM SLUMP OF 3h. L FJA11 • ' M14I ( I i 4 ( I y I i 1 1 ( (Cl 510EWALKJLYVTS • .{ice I { 1 - / -+ "� 1, 1 - -CONTROL JOINTS/JC>I^'%'„4TcE(4( Si'?LL 6C- �44•rNKCNESS 4TM4[5PAC1NG Of 15 FEET =- v ' 1•-- i 1 j i i •--I I a { -EYP-i s O J JOINJ5 544CC 6E 3/'e WCA!E94 ros,.'E...MI5 2 AS SlOWy oN A.P W4 STO JL44: 7 • •yet 84Ctrot" i ! ...... i I A� • I I• I i i I 1 i Y N - „� = (..-�225 t Ns r4,f PE 6 / ammo 1 i �L�1 I "f'tP4CE! •- � ..:' ! --; ti0 - - I( ( ( i } 1 1 I 1 1 a.... ( I I -f, JSfc SEV-ce0Av:5 SMALL 6E fs'OEEPAT SFOnTcfK;c25 1 ®��i•• D :1 i vwi •-'-1... I I j , I I t I. ''Y .. + i 4�V ` - ACC JA14f5 SH4[C be CL bfti EO I E�^.C.E_'1 ATE4 %f E4O4T✓Oi"7rI/2 eT WALK EO4E j �0.-- : • i/ ( 1 I I I.••I •-a -O - . . pF 1/ - SlAewnLKs SOU aE cir;N a 7 uss.E:s eRlX1r,:iN/s�r :•. "0 1 I M1.. .I I / /i---��,�� i • -'a .- ` 7, 1; / Zinn CuE7S/GUTIEeS • ' (,+!• =2_V`` -- ; • 7 +/ 1 I - I ( F 'T/ 'G7`, �a` �y .. ..(: ! (¢) 4Ht CEMEI/j CANCRE7E CC1Rrs L CL,eR sN4cc 6E YYPE A•!AS nE74/CEn oVARw4.STANOARO I { 1 - i a ✓. I I.- - { I 1 1 I EL 7r7.4A•t I ® 14:- o .. --�. ( I I ( 1 (.....'66., `' _:,1....:-AL:Z/G.... (L) cuf6¢carat JArM75 j R 1 i� ( I i 1 I ` I (EJ'T)G'dd.i El 1ST! S •T _ EL.0 ! t -I y I. } ` �_ 7•/'tJ, OUM+Iy.At,J;y AF vOT[ESi f44N 3'IL;Cu'ESS SHALL 56 Af fNE SAME`JIa+E N5JAv5 45 _ 1 . •( .( I \- ., 1/ I E Di...JO N'S,ETCEP. fe41!•�YSI-e.t XYTEJJO o.Cr rlvTO 6urrERSECj%ON.DI/1 T 7�• T., - I ' /-( ' I { ! I JO/VT 5PAC1Ny SIJOLC ERCEEO 15 ice:-CEN1ERS S/'4 • - I 1 ..I-•/ I 1 I II I lir. � E II f ( -E,(PA+JSION JA"VTS oot a ExcE6o:S� :-CE7E I4c;SHALL 66 PLEC{'0/1'%LT AT R7'v15 �- , I ' i I i I ' _ 1 I AF T441GFo w AU STAEETS • I / .... I/ i 1 I �- s 1 2 co=1.- 12_ '-'I _ 1 i j� OPEN/VG fAR:4BfCULYEgF 1b/3ECUT I �\7 ��LTii1 I ; = �t(14kt�41vAGE oIPE c / I ...... ., / { i ` I EC hi 4 Nu:9CTLIf/5S- .I- --'- �ruC1111"s ' ( C1wCREfE PIN OP TO I rNCC.L7rVG 2`•SJ-'s- SE UN•Se:U.ORCEO 4Nn CC11/fO.M NG TOASrA". I .. ........ . .... I 1 I I.. .... .+ + C-M 744CE 1,Ru65E1(45(ET_-CORR A[UM-4I/OT CCLV.PIPE Sti4LL 6E 445Hn 6'PAQFORATtO nR4/NT/CE I. I. -/ ! ( I I I I + /N 1//.I/0J1:5L}S€FfKSARnuua::::::I• .; ��® r•fffR451REN(T rN QR41A/f„(AYELA1A7Eq/kL... ( / ( I I ! I I OP,F"APE 5 ••LL',EfThG1WEI-41174-V0:::I.. .-- �2 .: 4G�CMP.. M-/9G,M197 h-ZNB M-7J9.dfuC'4C,C4LLFS1>jP-"i Sk'4LL 6EASNATEaANfIE PLtUS- JJJIII I LOLI4rzolyrl7Z�.n`fr FfLNC t.N(t4tlit"•..� ' ® - }-cut..v Qz-''.--- QE"ifOECEO PIPE SN4LC CONF024't 45T4t CESrrN4T1041 C-76 ' i a�® - /N5T4CUTION5 SHALL 6C-IN/.0004'N•/CE+'>l1 j/CTn:N 534.P./..A E A!S fO.f 5467if-f••- -_t I f RE WItELI SPACE 4E pEq's.mo(ANufgCTUREAQS: - ... /•.I......... ......... .........i I I E QUCQEMENfS I -• ��® - t ( x.r_, res. : CTInN { ..... .,... ......... 1 I I T�15 SIf.4'LL:6EgSAy44Uf4[fURFJ:6x I I JL76/vSfa•JO•EA=lLi1'Q' : - 1 i C4fCN='�Sr.�s s I., j, / I ARIFICA 37EF_C CORD Aq APPRrI�kQ F.Qu4L: ::1 f /j4Sf.K)OlK i.7 1YPEL. _� 1 rYPE l-C,CATCH 64S/V 544[C CC,vf0c4vTo SEC 63/ta,4PW-4 CST4vC4fn D(4y"v!Se -.r:o- I 1 I i 1- -- ---- - /rr-c.C4TCN 6•TI sv/[c fcvFA{.r^sEc.cl/s4.4 P.•yc(SPiV/}4g0 PL4v y'ss ra � — / _ ( i I /2 /g /4 t3/A! TYPE R cTA;Al. I C, WA L Z _ cute/v[E15N,u ca fAf++7Asfc,a3 E: . - G:::�� ::::: . 9 - /o F L VA T /v /, FL CI:. :•.•_59 :TTR�= / F /O _ (r.•<Cn'• car.-.:•-.-E.,•: . Swal L CnV"r�re)A.Ly4 c'-arr.,0 PUN Y•47 1 "` er ,•,.A• PRIVATE ROAD EXTENSION JOB NiX "¢/' REV.N0. GATE DESCRIPTION MADE BY CHKKFD REV.N0. DATE - DESCRIPTION MADE BY CHKKED SCALE TEtj r J' G- Y.L04, A - A SHEET DAT �[ _` c ( EDMONDS AVE N.E.) 2 HUGH G. GOLDSMITH and ASSOCIATES; INC. DATE I T ' CIVIL ENGINEERS PLANNERS LAND SURVEYORS APPROVED' ,; fa �F ROAD AND STORM DRAINAGE 501 LION BUILDING SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104 622-1080 FIELD BOOK. IT-LTItt\\\`+ PLAN a PROFILE 5'1174 R6v1SE0turerLO4OCR40f5(Cu[vEeTSW ! •1NL PAGE I- CITY OF RE NTON WASHINGTON