Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA80-050 - • - - , • .f. Avrwlatiatids ►o t - i •.iw ,1 ., .16 vt ^t 3 .# to `� I . 1 . >,., .4 ..i. Ilk, , -a r r p lg• 1r ri •� J I r_ III -. .. ?- I ' V W t. t . , ell. r , la -la ' +s `' F+••.. A -1 -L ' - ' •�.� . rior .I+ yy,��It 1 irt,N ..r= rri „ / ..... , i 1 1 0 1 ig'—' -. (T 1 I i 1 s 1 I 1 1 1 4 A • i' • N 'w. I • • • . ik'1 V. 11.1.11AfriL. rgeliMN"RT; *ri • r s • 1 r , IOW .• " .n - r7T ,r ti •••r I • • T:: - �..� -- Z.' 41111 • itir 4 IL).c. di r- • 44 • :# i • iz' r r .' � >.Y r. .. }. tea' s .-..:Adria: . 'ter IV 6V. , -- �, 0ME F 1 ` 1 i 6MAP5 BEGINNING OF FILE FILE TITLE SpgGIAI. PERMIT SP=U SA- 88 Ff)Iz PflRKWG IN 13° I FOt OFFle,E Bt. DG . AT 516 AND PN►eK AVENUE N0R771 FIFTH' AND PARK PLACE CC). ' ram• • • I• STEPHEN J. CRANE ATTORNEY AT LAW CRANE,CARROLL,BOESE,DUNHAM,STAMPER DAILY 350 GRAND CENTRAL ON THE PARK _ (206) 292-9090 SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98(04, CABLE:INTERLAW .I • • 1:1 • • .. • _ _ _ . `...1111010111.- J n _JJ - - I - • all I . , 41,1411101ffilirt ,.. Mil . ., • •i• . . , . hi I !I .1 lie.. • 1;71. . ' . IS ,,, ..... ... OPP "4.*11t.4,1'441"" ;• •..4"....".1", ,-:, ...... "ft • 41104611.""." • I Fir Ai 1 , -.ram•w _.. a �i '. S ti • .� ': 1 a OF R + 4 • v ,$ CZz • OFFICE of the CITY CLERK 200 Mill Avenue South Renton,Washington 98055. 0 • 44-0 SEPS,- Q CONFIDENTIAL ;1-6-"A.:4'1-443 OF R.4, 41 U to i OZ OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY• RENTON,WASHINGTON POST OFFICE BOX 626 100 2nd AVENUE BUILDING • RENTON.WASHINGTON 98055 255-8678 n Gommfp p LAWRENCE J.WARREN, CITY ATTORNEY DANIEL KELLOGG, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY 99�r M�� � July 17, 1980 Ep SEP.V RECEIVED CITY _OE RENTON HEARING E(AMINER JUL 1 c 19$0 TO: . ROGER BLAtOCK, Associate Planner +� o:�oiDoB9® m ► � q5�t FROM: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Re: 5th and Park Building ' Auxiliary Parking Lots and Lease Agreements - I " Dear Roger: I have reviewed your memorandum dated July 7, 1980. I have a real concernabout.1lease agreements for parking spaces that has a section in the lease concerning the default and re-entry. Mr. Horbach could approach the City and obtain approval of the auxiliary parking lots and then proceed . to finish his building and get an occupancy permit. Thereafter, he couldIdefault on the lease and the City would be put in a. significantly less tenable position by being forced to remove the occupancy permit and evict the tenants. I do not believe this is a.position the City should be placed in. I think Mr. Horbach should be required to provide to the City permanent and 'perpetual parking lot agreements if the City, is to accept those lots as auxiliary parking lots, Otherwise, Mr. Horbach should be required to prove fee ownership in the parking lots, with restrictive covenants that they run with . the title to the building or be dedicated to parking for' the building, or prove to the City that the parking requirement is met on site. ' It should be noted that Mr. Horback has violated his submittals to the City on this particular site, and that he has to prove to the City that he can meet our ordinances for obtaining an occupancy permit. In some manner, the City must be assured that sufficient parking will be provided for the life of the building. The present parking lot leases do not provide that assurance. Should you have any further questions on this matter, please feel free to contact me. . Very truly yours, , . Lawrence J. Warren LJW:bjm cc: Mayor, Council Pres, Gonnason, Hearing Examiner, • Renton City Council 7/20/81 Page 2 Public Hearing - Continued Six-Year Harry Long, 220 Seneca NW, asked for safety and called attention Transportation • to landscaping which obstructs vision and creates traffic hazard. Improvement Councilman Stredicke inquired re Item No. 2 Miscellaneous street Program improvements and asked that walkways be included. Upon inquiry by Councilman Clymer, Acting Public Works Director Houghton noted relaxation of rules for complete projects previously requiring curbs, sidewalks, etc. Upon inquiry Traffic Engineer Norris noted Items No. 7 through 12 were in response to accident report histories. Discussions ensued re Shattuck St. underpass, intersection of Kirkland Ave. NE and NE Sunset Blvd. Councilman Hughes requested Staff investigate installation of neoprene dampeners at RR crossings. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND CLYMER, (BECAUSE OF NON-COMPLETION OF SR 515) ITEM NO. 22 TALBOT RD. S BE ELEVATED TO FIRST YEAR ELEMENTS AND PLACED BETWEEN ITEMS 12 AND 13. CARRIED. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND REED, ITEM NO. 15 RENTON AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY BE PLACED AS NO. 2 FOLLOWING GRADY WAY BRIDGE. CARRIED. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND CLYMER, ITEM NO. 5 NE 4th ST. BE EXTENDED ENTIRE STRIP UNION AVE. NE TO NE SUNSET BLVD. Traffic Engineer Norris noted Item 22 Talbot Rd S, no funding available at the present time and changing of priorities without funding is misleading. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND CLYMER, ITEM NO. 7 SHATTUCK AVE. S, S 4th PL TO S 7th ST. , BE STRICKEN FROM SIX-YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM. CARRIED. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND REED, CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. CARRIED. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND CLYMER, THE SIX-YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR 1982 - 1987 BE ADOPTED AS AMENDED AND REFERRED TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE FOR RESOLUTION. CARRIED. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND REED, ITEM NO. 6 WELLS AVENUE 'BRIDGE REPLACEMENT, BE REFERRED TO THE TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE TO DISCUSS CHANGE IN DESIGN. ROLL CALL: 3-AYE: STREDICKE, REED, CLYMER; 2-NO: TRIMM AND HUGHES. MOTION CARRIED. Recess MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND REED, COUNCIL RECESS FOR FIVE MINUTES. CARRIED. Council recessed at 9:35 p.m. and reconvened at 9:50 p.m. ROLL CALL: STREDICKE, REED, TRIMM, CLYMER AND HUGHES. AUDIENCE COMMENT Attorney Kevin Henderson, 216 1st S, Seattle, representing E. Horbach Fifth and Park re parking requirements for Fifth and Park Place Building, recalled Place Building the City Council granted a Special Permit 8/18/80 to meet the off- Special Permit street parking requirements through five auxiliary parking lots. re Parking Mr. Henderson called attention to one of the parking lots located Modification at southwest corner of Pelly and 6th Ave. N. (owned by Mr. Horbach) Requested which is improved by a building formerly leased by the City Water Dept, for equipment; the lot provides a portion of the required 280 parking spaces required for the Fifth and Park Place Building. Mr. Henderson, requested newly adopted Zone Code amendments be applied to the parking regulations, allowing reduction of require- ments, including parking stall size, to prevent necessity to demolish the existing structure, thereby saving money by continued use. City Attorney Warren noted parking should have been installed prior to this time. Council President Stredicke recalled Special Permit overturned Examiner's recommendation, that applicant's construction of third floor of Fifth and Park Place Building in lieu of parking necessitated the Special Permit for parking. City Attorney Warren noted Code revision prohibited leased parking as used by Mr. Horbach for the Fifth and Park Place Building. Following further discussion, it was Moved by Clymer, Second Reed, Council proceed to the next Agenda item. SUBSTITUTE MOTION BY STREDICKE, SECOND CLYMER, REQUEST TO MODIFY SPECIAL PERMIT BE DENIED. CARRIED. CONSENT AGENDA The following items are adopted by one motion which follows the business matters included: Traffic Study Letter from Public Works Department requested transfer of funds in Projects amount of $9,900 to provide matching money for three Traffic Study projects funded 82.98% by Federal FAUS Grants. Projects: Safety Planning, Traffic Study; Valley Parkway SW Study and SW 27th Street Study. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. (See Page 4.) PER, LtzANE, STAMATTO RN ESE,ATD LAW HAM& DA'70 2 oil 350 GRAND CENTRAL ON THE PARK ;) / �'�� SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98104 � �y� � • MAX BOESE (206)292-9090 ��� `` �i STEPHEN J.CRANE A �' �� CABLE:INTERLAW STEVEN R.DAILY D V(` �•' - DOUGLAS S.DUNHAM ��� �k 'tl adz 1 OF COUNSEL KEVIN C.STAMPER ®'� W�„�l'ti�Y ROBERT A.BASKERVILLE THOMAS J.LUCAS THOMAS A.WOLFE I -.9 V� 1 C�) - . July 15, 1981 �° RECEIVED Renton City Council JUL 15 195- Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South CITY OF RENTON Renton, WA 98055 CITY COUNCIL Attention: Clerk of the Council Re: Fifth & Park Place Building Dear City Council: This letter is to request that the above-referenced project be placed upon the City Council agenda for the next Council meeting on Monday, July 20th. BACKGROUND On August 18, 1980, the Renton City Council granted a "special permit" pursuant to applicable City ordinances allowing, among other actions , the Fifth & Park Place Company to meet otherwise applicable off-street parking requirements through securing space in five auxillary parking lots. See attached Minutes . One of the five parking lots is located at the Southwest corner of Pelly and Sixth Avenue North. The property, owned by the applicant/developer, is improved with a shed previously leased by the City Water Department to house equipment for monitoring the load of different water reservoirs serving Renton. The subject ,property is 1700 square feet and provided a portion of the 280 'off-street parking spaces required for the building. • CHANGE IN APPLICABLE ORDINANCES Subsequent to the Council action on August 15, 1980, new parking requirements were adopted by the City Council via amendments to the zoning code. The thrust of these amendments is to significantly reduce the size and other requirements associated with vehicular parking due to the acknowledgement by the City of the shrinking of the length and bulk of the typical automobile. y n b Renton City Council Page 2 July 15, 1981 This change in governing ordinances means that it is not necessary to demolish the existing structure on the site formerly leased by the City in order to satisfy the off-street parking requirements , This will result in the saving of substantial sums of monies to my client and allow continued use of an existing structure. It will also result in the striping of smaller stalls , thereby encouraging use of smaller, more fuel efficient automob iles. MODIFICATION• OF SPECIAL PERMIT CONDITIONS Therefore, for reasons noted above, we respectfully request that you modify the above referenced special permit to allow for the continued existence of the shed and reduction of the number of parking stalls to be provided for the above referenced building at this site. Thank you. Very truly yours , GRAN STAMPS OESE, DUNHAM & DAILY p en J. Crane S JC:nab cc: Fifth & Park Place Company 8361A Renton City Council 8/18/80 Page 2 Audience Comment - Continued Fifth and Park Steve Crane, 350 Grand Central on the Park, Seattle, representing Place Company Eugene Horbach, recalled last weeks appeal of Hearing Examiner's Appeal decision re Special Permit SP-050-80 Fifth and Park Place Co. and leases submitted for approval . MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND ROCKHILL, THE MATTER BE TAKEN FROM THE TABLE, CARRIED. Crane noted two leases were submitted to the City Attorney for review for time period of 30 years with ten year extensions for total of 40 years and that third addendum was provided for additional issues of concern; that prime leasee, Boeing Company, would cure any default of agreement; and asked the City Council to review decision of the Hearing Imo' Examiner and direct appropriate City Department to approve .the parking plan. Following discussion, it was MOVED BY ROCKHILL, SECOND CLYMER, THE APPEAL OF FIFTH AND PARK PLACE COMPANY BE UP- HELD, THE SPECIAL PERMIT BE GRANTED BASED UPON THE RESTRICTION OF PARKING IN THE 20 FT. ZONE CONNECTING PARKING AREAS DESIGNATED NO. 2 AND NO. 3, AND THAT THE SIGNING BE RESPONSIBILITY OF FIFTH AND PARK PLACE COMPANY. Upon inquiry Crane noted the 2nd and 3rd floors of the building were 95% complete. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND BY REED, SUBSTITUTE MOTION, refer matter back to the Planning and Development Committee for one week. SUBSTITUTE MOTION FAILED. Rockhill noted upholding of appeal is based on new evidence, not overturning Examiner's decision. Discussion ensued regarding the Examiner's Conclusion No. 2 re 20 ft. strip running between N 4th and N 5th. and need for access by emergency vehicles and number of parking stalls required. Upon inquiry, Planning Department Repre- sentative Blaylock noted 288 spaces provided, that 20 were removed by restricting parking on the alley, leaving 268 and regulations require 270 stalls, City Attorney Warren noted need for adherence to ordinances. MOTION MODIFIED BY CLYMER, AGREED BY ROCKHILL, TO SUSTAIN APPEAL OFFIFTH AND PARK PLACE COMPANY, GRANT NECESSARY 278 Parking PERMITSBASED UPON RESTRICTION OF PARKING ON ONE SIDE OF 20 FT. Stalls Approved ZONE CONNECTING PARKING AREAS DESIGNATED NO. 2 and NO. 3, AND SIGNING BE RESPONSIBILITY OF FIFTH AND PARK PLACE COMPANY. CARRIED. Councilman Stredicke requested his NO vote be recorded. Recess MOVED BY SHANE, SECOND STREDICKE, COUNCIL RECESS FOR 10 MINUTES. CARRIED. 9: 10 p.m. Council recessed at 9: 17 p.m. Roll Call : All present except Councilman Shane left the meeting due to illness. CONSENT AGENDA Councilman Stredicke requested deletion of referral to the Park Board Item 7.a. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND REED, ITEM 7,d. BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA. CARRIED. (See latter following Consent Agenda for Item 7.d. re LID #312 West Valley Hwy. improvements. ) The following items are adopted by one motion which follows those business matters included: Bid Opening Bid Opening 8/13/80 for Redwood play equipment; two bids received. Play Equipment (See attached tabulation.) Letter from Park Superintendent Ron Heiret recommended concurrence in the Park Board recommendation Contract Award to accept the low bid from Cascade Recreation" Equipment in the amount of $47,278.67. The letter noted project consists of installation of play equipment at Philip Arnold, Maplewood, Highlands and Liberty Parks. Council concur. Appointment Mayor Shinpoch reappointed Barbara Lally to the Board of Adjustment for four year term effective to 9/6/84. Refer to the Ways and Means Committee. Borrow Funds. Letter from Finance Director Gwen Marshall requested a resolution be drawn to borrow $600,000 from Street Forward Thrust @ 9.00% interest per annum to be repaid no later than 12/31/80. The letter noted funds are required in three operating areas upon receipt of property taxes: Park Fund $300,000; Street Fund $250,000; Library Fund $50,000. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Houle Corp. Summons and Complaint was filed: Houle Corporation vs. City of Renton, Court Case Maples Construction Co. and Fidelity & Deposit of Maryland regarding labor and materials charges on completion of the main headquarters Phase II of Fire Station No. 11 . Refer to the City Attorney. I Page A2 Wednesday, July 22, 1981 Record Chronicle I A step too far ounce shuts out Iiip v eo e r'e s plan forsqueeze play 1 0. Eugene Horbach, a developer, be changed later because the code made one request too many as far as changes, he said. Renton City Council was concerned Mayor concerned Monday night. Renton Mayor Barbara Shinpoch Horbach built the Fifth & Park asked Larry Warren, city attorney, Place Building last year at an in- whether approving Horbach's re- tersection of those streets in North quest would "open the floodgates" Renton. The bottom floor of the for similar requests from other de- three-story, multi-million-dollar of- velopers. fice building was supposed to be Replied Warren, "It might." He reserved for parking, according to said if the parking question is plans presented to the city building reopened due to code changes,other department. stricter building code changes,also But that's not what happened. should be reopened. Instead, Horbach enclosed the bot- Finally, City Council voted un- tom floor for more office space.The animously to deny Horbach's re- Boeing Co. now leases the building. quest for a change in parking re- • W City Council could have forced quirements. Horbach will have to Horbach to tear out the first floor provide additional parking before offices and install the parking gar- his temporary occupancy permit is li.age.Instead,the council agreed to let terminated. Horbach buy and lease surrounding In other action, City Council re- - property to provide 270 parking ferred to the Public Works Depart- places for the building. ment and city attorney's office a Code revised letter from property owners along Since then part of the building. Talbot Road South. code has been revised to allow for Review asked smaller parking spaces for build- The property owners want a local ings. Smaller parking stalls mean improvement district reviewed by more stalls can be placed on the the city so Victoria Park Home same amount of ground. homeowners pay a part of the LID Monday night, an attorney repre- costs. senting Horbach asked City Council Construction of Victoria Park sub- to let his client place parking stalls division in recent years has caused according to the new code. That increased surface water runoff to would mean Horbach wouldn't have cascade down Talbot Hill,over Tal- to tear down a building he owns on bot Road,and into yards of homes on adjacent property to provide the the lower west side of the road. additional parking required under The LID was formed to correct the old code. that problem in 1978.But nothing has City Council didn't buy the argu- been done and property ownership ment. changes have occurred in the mean- Council President Dick Stredicke time. The present property owners • compared Horbach's situation to de- believe Victoria Park should help aling with zoning or setbacks. What bear the LID costs since runoff is is done under codes at one time can't coming from that subdivision. pu .4,A i_, `�' .s ;7— ;.> ® TH CITY OF RJFNTON ; _ MUNICIPAL BUILDING . 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 o y-.,., ; ': BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR 09gFO SEP�E�O�� ' MEMORANDUM ' TO: Warren Gonnason DATE: May Ron Nelson ,12, 1980 ._.. John Webley Gordon Ericksen a °• „ 9 Y Dick Geissler Y Larry Warren 1 2 9 t !/;i� 4 i 1Cr1.) i FROM: Mayor Shinpoch I $ SUBJECT: 5th and Park Building - On Friday, May 9, I was assured' by Public Works that work ,was not being done on the first floor of the Fifth an'd Park building. I wept to the property on Friday morning. This appeared to be the case. Work was being done on the second and third floors for which, the developer has a legal permit. Although the street side of the building on the first floor was enclosed, the other three sides were open I and, to give ,the benefit of doubt, it was possible that parking could still be accommodated on the ground floor. On Saturday, May 10, I again visited the site. Extensive work was being done to enclose the ground floor. No foreman was available. I could not located Mr. Gonnason, Mr. Nelson, or, in fact, Mr. Shane or Mr. Stredicke. I went to the property again Saturday afternoon. Work was continuing on the first floor. Again, no foreman was on the job. I did not see an orange tag, and none of the workmen knew where the boss was. 1. If work has been done on the first floor which reasonably precludes• its use for parking, in violation of the building permit, I want that portion red- tagged or whatever is required to prevent work and to insure that there is a penalty for resumption. 2. It is my understanding that the developer may not be issued an occupancy permit prior to resolution of the parking requirements. Information Friday indicated that Boeing tenants were expecting to move in immediately into a finished portion of the building. Mr. Gonnason is to (as a courtesy) advise Mr. Bixby (Facilities/Boeing) , that the building may not be legally occupied without such a permit. 3. The builder has become the City's landlord (water shop property) , and we have been notified to vacate June 1. This is to be done. Mr. Miller indicates that the shop site is crowded but that we can make do until other arrangements can be made. '1 May' 12, 1980 . Page 2 4.• Re: Mothers' Park parking!. This property is not available to other than City vehicles and park patrons. I have advised Mr. Webley that I would encourage the .Park Board not to change their policy on the use of such facilities. 5. I want to know if the Fifth and Park building exceeds City height restrictions for development next to a single family residence and/or if the developer has purchased the small home on the adjoining property. 6. Further, it has been reported that a City employee has been involved in private, off-duty work on this project. My ethics letter of March 3 states that this activity is permitted if the private employment does not jeopardize objectivity in performing City duties. I want written assurance that this is the case in this instance. • • I want every precaution taken by every department involved that this development follows the letter of the law. No penalties are to accrue to the developer that are not absolutely legal and no allowances are to be made that are not provided for by ordinance. The sequence must be that our legal requirements are met step by step -- parking provisions, landscaping, fire inspection, building acceptance -- all of it prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit. iL.h..1.24,Also.40 • Sks-APOCIAJ Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor BYS:hh cc: /City Council Members • RENTON CITY COUNCIL - Regular Meeting May 12 , 1980 Municipal Building Monday , 8 : 00 P .M . Council Chambers MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag and called the Renton City Council meeting to order. ROLL CALL OF THOMAS W. TRIMM, Council President;. CHARLES F. SHANE, JOHN W. COUNCIL REED, RICHARD M. STREDICKE, RANDALL ROCKHILL, ROBERT HUGHES, AND EARL CLYMER. CITY OFFICIALS BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, Mayor; LAWRENCE WARREN, City Attorney; IN ATTENDANCE DELORES MEAD, City Clerk; MICHAEL PARNESS, Administrative Assistant; WARREN GONNASON, Public Works Director; JOHN WEBLEY, Parks & Recreation Director; RAY CALDWELL, Police Dept. Rep. MINUTE APPROVAL MOVED BY TRIMM, SECOND CLYMER, APPROVE COUNCIL MINUTES OF MAY 5., 1980 AS;WRITTEN. CARRIED. CONSENT AGENDA The following items are adopted by one motion which follows the business matters included: Proclamation Proclamation of Mayor Shinpoch declared Municipal Clerk's Week as May 10, 19801through May 16, 1980. Council concurred. Affirmative Personnel Director Green requested revision of the City's Action Plan Affirmative Action Plan-Fair Practices Policy. Refer to Ways and Means: Committee for resolution. Acceptance of Traffic Engineering Division recommended acceptance of project Signal Electric SW Sunset Blvd. and SW Langston Rd. Signal Electric, CAG-008-80, CAG-008-80 as of May 12, 1980. Final payment of $11 ,433.87 and release of the retainage amount be authorized subject to receipt of required clearances, after 30 day lien period. Council concurred. Transfer of Traffic Engineering Division recommended budget transfer of Funds- Inventory $5,000.00 to provide Inventory Data requested by State Urban Data Arterial Board to be accomplished by URS Co. Refer to Ways and Means Committee for resolution. Authorization for Parks Director Webley requested resolution authorizing a grant Grant-Gene Coulon application to State Interagency Committee for Outdoor Recreation Memorial Beach for 50% to 75% funding of $500,000 project at Gene Coulon Memorial Park Beach Park. Refer to Ways and Means Committee for resolution. Appropriation of Parks Director; Webley requested ordinance for appropriation Funds - Park of funds in the amount of $57,045 for various improvements to Dept. park facilities and additional machinery and equipment. Funds from Park Fund Excess Revenue.Refer to Ways ano Means Committee. Street Vacation- City Clerk Mead presented petition for vacation of a street, Pelly Place North Pelly Place North. Refer matter to the Public Works Dept. , VAC-2-80 Board of Public Works, and Transportation Committee for determination regarding appraisal and retention of utility easements and to Ways Public Hearing and Means Committee for a resolution setting June 23, 1980 as date June 23, 1980 for public hearing. Council concurred. Consent Agenda MOVED BY TRIMM, SECOND SHANE, ADOPT THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. Approved CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE AND CURRENT BUSINESS Taxi Cab Letter was read from OK Cab Inc. , Doretha E. Rood, President, Zones requesting ordinance providing for additional taxi cab parking or legalize parking in other than designated cab zones. Letter TA,-ta' • (igot-414.4,)t. "- • 'Renton City Council May 12, 1980 Page Two Correspondence and Current Business - Continued Taxi Cab was also read from Leslie Funderburg, Silver Top Cab Co. , Zones requesting a chance to meet with council re taxi cab parking problem. OLD BUSINESS 5th and Park Councilman Shane noted that contractors should not be Building allowed to build without meeting the city's building code as in regards to the 5th and Park Building being built by Eugene " Horbach. Councilman Stredicke noted there was to be two stories of office space and one floor of parking, but upon visiting the site found the 1st floor had been enclosed. Mayo Shinpoch explained the builder can proceed with the second and third floors, but an occupancy permit can not be issued until all legal requirements are met step by step. Community Services Community Services Committee Chairman Reed presented report Committee -Funds that no action be taken at this time regarding funding for for Purchase of purchase of older homes. MOVED BY REED, SECOND CLYMER, TO Older Homes CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Solid Waste Community Services Committee report recommended that the Management Administration authorize the King Subregional Council/Solid Waste Management Board to include the City's solid waste management in the county-wide plan and refer to Ways and Means Committee for ordinance. MOVED BY REED, SECOND CLYMER, TO CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. Utilities Committee. Utilities Committee Chairman Shane presented report for LID 317 - Water, authorization of a water line LID petitioned by property owners Vicinity of S. outside the City Limits (lying within the City's service area) . 132nd & S. Langston LID will be accomplished at no cost to the City's Utility. Rd. (Outside City Report further recommended referral to Ways and Means Committee Limits) for resolution of intent and setting of public hearing. MOVED BY SHANE, SECOND HUGHES, TO CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. ROLL CALL: 5-AYE: TRIMM, SHANE, ROCKHILL, HUGHES, CLYMER; 2-NO, REED, STREDICKE. MOTION CARRIED. LID 313- Off-Site Utilities Committee report recommended LID 313 be created to Improvements correct run-off problem in the vicinity of Talbot Rd.and matter of waiving of off-site improvements be referred to the Transportation Committee with recommendation that no waiving of off-site improve- ments be established as City policy. Committee report 'recommended Approval of authorization for Latecomer's Agreements for: Howard-Cooper Latecomer's Water Supply Line, Eastridge Apartments, Lakeview Towers (Water Line) , Agreements - Azalea Lane, Kohl Excavating (Water Mains) , Lyle Barger, Superior Fast Freight, and Bel-Shane Addition; with referral to the Adminis- tration for a report back on the inspection of work, the establish- ment of unit prices and the construction and inspection of the . facilties. Committee report recommended concurrence with the Solid Waste League of Women Voters regarding Solid Waste Management and recommended Management referral to King County for their consideration in the development of the County Solid Waste Management Plan update. MOVED BY SHANE, SECOND HUGHES TO CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Transportation Transportation Committee Chairman Stredicke presented report Committee recommend;nythe City initiate a resolution of intent to create LID 318 - Street an LID for the North 30th Street improvements and refer to the . Improvements - Ways and Means Committee for resolution of intent and setting the N. 30th St. from public hearing. Report also recommended the Public Works Dept. Park Ave. N. to meet with the affected property owners in the LID prior to the I-405 hearing date. MOVED BY ROCKHILL, SECOND SHANE TO CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. 1 • V -Pa • IEHORAN1DUM OF C®NICEV RENICE APPLICATION NO(s ) : B-6990/B-7099 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL : Enclose first floor of three-story office building. PROPONENT : 5TH AND 'PARK PLACE COMPANY LOCATION OF PROPOSAL : ; North 5th Street and Park Ave. North LEAD AGENCY: Building Department DATE OF ERC REVIEW: 8/27/80 Acting as the Responsible Official , the ERC has determined that the requested modifications to the initial proposal reviewed under ECF-499-79 on September 14, 1979, are within the scope of that original proposal and the environmental determination of non-significance is still valid. This decision was reached following a presentation by Ron Nelson of the Building Department. Oral comments were accepted from : Don Perrson , Police Department Incorporated by reference in the record of proceedings of the ERC . on application ECF-499-79 are the following: 1) Environmental Checklist Review Sheets, prepared by : James Hanson dated ' September , 12 , 1979 2) Applications: B-6990/B-7099 - SP-050-80 SIGNATURES : • a I: / . y E . Webley , Pa s and ,- -.'rd.n :' ;' i:r sen Recreation Director / /lann '/g, Director Warren C . Gonnason Public Works Director • • Renton City Council ' . j � 8/25/80 Page 4 ' ' Correspondence - Continued' i ' Fi'remen's Letter •:from Mayor^Shinpoch .requested authorization to expend " Pension Fund `$1 ,500 for -actuari:al report to determine status of the Firemen's Actuary , Pension",Fund::` .The letter noted the funds are available in the City Clerk's. budget. '•,,1MOVED BY'.CLYMER,'. SECOND HUGHES, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE'MAYOR!S REQUEST AND AUTHORIZE PAYMENT OF REPORT.* Upoi" ' i nqu,i'ry,'by Cou`ncillmen Stredicke,'. Mayor Shinpoch explained the ' Fire Department :1epresent' ;ives to the Board are,requesting/funding by the° City.' at• .19C.`per-.$1 ,,000,,valuation and:•..the City is requesting an actuary which' ;would :show:Firemen's ,Pension Fund to be solvent: • The Board had paid;":for. the' present; actuarial report in 1978.. City ' 'Attorney' Warren; noted :change .,i n law and amount the City would need ' ` to add to the ".fund would be"221'0 per thousand assessed value of the City *MOTION CARRIED Upon inquiry by Councilman Stredicke, City Clerk Mead noted.•fthe';;City,Counci'l' appointment to the Firemen's x.`Pens ion Board is :;the '•%Chairman of "comet i ttee`representing Finance (Ways and;Means Committee).as require by State law. _ Horbach Letter f,rom,;"Paul,.;Maxin , ,Renton Citizen, ;.expressed disappointment Building at the Council granting Eugene Horbach's appeal on 8/18/80 and Park Ave. N. asked more strict enforcement of the City':s' ordinances. MOVED BY STRED I CKE•,'..SECOND° SHANE, REFER. THE LETTER TO THE. MAYOR'S OFFICE FOR :REPLY:: CARRIED. .,. :;, .-, :•: .. - OLD BUSINESS Transportation: Committee Chairman Stredicke presented committee " . Transportation :,report ;recommendi;ng,•that';no,act ion..be taken re the non-conforming Committee •",parking`.:lot:a't'" 5.th• -and Sm i thers" since the Administration has Non-Conforming notified the, p.roperty�.owner„of the,problem and •requirements. ; The.,Transportation::C.ommittee 'reported review•,of, Councilman Hughes Parking Lot • comments re "go• vernment vehic•le ,only" parking on the property Armed Services of the new Johnson Building at Main and,..Houser:'. The report stated - Recruiting• the developer provided enough parking 'stalls to meet City require- Offices Parking :ments; that.,the..Transportation ;Commi"t tee. feels. restricting certain stalls to certain; vehicles:'is an internal property owner problem. The commi:t tee •recommended..no• action. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND ROCKH I,LL, ,,CONCUR A N COMMITTEE. REPORT,. CARRIED.-, Public Safety Public ,Safety .Comm i t tee'.Chairman. Hughes 'submitted committee report Commit tee ,recommending,the,.approval` of•" the sale of. OK Cab Company to Leslie. Sale of OK Cab ;.Funderburg ;as;requested. MOVED ,.BY". 'HUGHES,,:.;SECOND, T,RIMM,. COUNCIL ACCEPT .THE.; PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE: RECOMMENDATION. Upon inquiry . ' by Councilman ;Steed i cke°, ;,Counc,i lman Hughes+ noted. Les Leslie Funderburg would keep both taxi company licenses, i'.e.:• OK Cab Company and Si,lver.,.top Cab..Company::: CARRIED. , Ways and Means Ways and.Means'CommitteeChairma Clymer presented committee report Committee recommending, concurrence in: the ,Mayor's reappointment, of, Barbara' Appointment Lally to the Board. of 'Adjustment; Position #7, four-year term •" Confirmed S effective to 916/84. MOVED::BY,,:•STRED_ 'ICKE, SECOND:. :SHANE,. CONCUR,•IN COMMITTEE REPORT:1;,,CARRIED fl • ti.• ..." . Voucher Approval The Ways and Means Committee recommended approval for payment of • • Vouchers No.. .297,1.0, thr,ough.,,No.;,29940 in' the ;amount of $538,475.94 . hav i ng';received,.departmenta l :cert i f i ca"t i on .ghat merchandise and , or services=•have'.;been r.,ece_ived or, rendered,- Vouchers 39705 through No. 29709 were'machine';•voided:•,=:MOVED BY CLYMER,. :SECOND HUGHES, COUNCIL CONCUR. IPRE,PQRT, APPROVi.NG PAYMENT, OF VOUCHERS. CARRIED. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS ; ' . Ordinance #3466 The Maya and; Mean's'CommiJttee recommended" second and final reading Vacation of ;of, an;ord i nance v'acat i ng a.',port ion,of. _NE .l 2th St. and determined to Portion NE 12th waive' the fee.;. :Foi l.owi ng.'reading it was.'MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND ROCKH I LL, ADOPT THE. ORDINANCE AS READ: -.'ROLL CALL: ALL AYES OF comic"LMEMBERS:PREVIOUSLY•:;,SHOWN: • CARRIED.,. ::;;:'': , ; Ordinance #3467 The Ways and Means. Committee .recommended .first reading of an•-' Cumulative ordina'nce creating a .Cumulative .Reserve #3467 for! the purpose of a Reserve #3467 reserve for, funding insurance contributions. .:. Following first reading; .'i t..,was` MOVED BY CLYMER,,,,SECOND;.SHANE, SUSPEND THE. RULES AND ADVANCE _TO SECOND 'AND-FINAL READINGS..• CARRIED. Following read- i ngs i.t was MOVED; BY CLYMER,` SECOND `HUGHES, ADOPT ORDINANCE AS READ. : ROLL. CALL; ALL AYES OF COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT. CARRIED. August 25, 1980 Subject: Mr. Horbach's Park Avenue Building Mayor Shinpoch and City Councilmen, I feel that I must register my disappointment at the action taken during the August 18 council meeting. In my opinion, the majority of the council must have been wearing rose colored glasses and/or have disregarded some of the facts con- cerning Mr. Eugene Horbach's new building on Park Avenue. This must be the third or fourth complex installed by Mr. Horbach in which he flaunts the city ordinances and makes a mockery of our system. An honest, law abiding citizen who complies with the regulations is definitely at a disadvantage. It must have been evident at an early stage that the Park Avenue complex was not being built according to the approved plans. Do the city inspectors visit the site every other month? Don't we have enforceable laws? If not, can't we revise them to have enforce- able laws? What the latest action by the council indicates to me is that one can submit any type of plan that will satisfy the scrutiny of the system and then one can do whatever one pleases. Lay back several months and one can wear down the system and have what he or she wants, par- ticularly if one can financially afford the delay for future financial potential profit. I am more than surprised at the council 's action, even if it isn't an election year. When will the council begin enforcing existing laws? ..C;114.0.7n A Paul Maxin Renton Citizen ' 1 RENTON CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting August 18 , 1980 " Municipal Building Monday 8 . 00 P. M. Council Chambers MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag and called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order. ROLL CALL OF THOMAS W. TRIMM, Council President; EARL CLYMER, ROQBERT HUGHES, COUNCIL RANDALL ROCKHILL, RICHARD M. STREDICKE, JOHN REED. ; MOVED BY TRIMM, SECOND CLYMER, EXCUSE ABSENT COUNCILMAN SHAN;E. CARRIED. Charles F. Shane arrived at 8: 10 p.m. CITY OFFICIALS BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, Mayor; DEL MEAD, City Clerk; LAWRENCE WARREN, IN ATTENDANCE City Attorney; MICHAEL PARNESS, Administrative Assistant; WARREN GONNASON, Public Works Director; DON PERSSON, Police Department; BRUCE PHILLIPS, Fire Department; ROGER BLAYLOCK, Planning Department. PRESS Greg Anderson, Renton Record Chronicle MINUTE APPROVAL Additions requested by Councilman' Stredicke: Page 2, Paragraph 11 , "Refer to Ways and Means Committee." Page 3,' Paragraph 1 , Change "site" to "route." MOVED BY TRIMM, SECOND STREDICKE, ADOPT THE COUNCIL MINUTES OF AUGUST 11 , 1980 AS CORRECTED. CARRIED. SPECIAL Special award for outstanding performance was presented to PRESENTATION Robert Deines, Renton Fire Fighter, by Mayor Shinpoch. Battalion by MAYOR Chief Phillips explained Deines attended Washington' State Fire- fighters Conference along with 350 recruits and received first place in technical knowledge and fire service skills . Phillips ' " and Mayor Shinpoch acknowledged pride in Deines' accomplishment. PUBLIC HEARING This being the date set and proper notices having been posted, Alley Vacation published and mailed according to law, Mayor Shinpoch opened the VAC-7-80 Public Hearing to consider vacation of a portion ofan alley Ivan-tch- located between •Burnett•Ave.- -N. , Park- Ave';" N. ; between N. 30th and N. 29th Streets; petition filed by Helen A. Ivanich, et al . Letter from the Board of Public Works found no objection to the vacation as not essential to the traffic circulation of the City and no easements required. The letter did not set value on the property as Council vacated the other portion of the alley at no fee; and noted the applicants should be required to furnish the' City' with a "Hold Harmless" agreement as a condition of the vacation to indemnify the City from any damanges due to access requirements on that portion of the alley. Eric Grindeland, 1217 N 30th, noted two of the property owners have agreed to allow access to his garage and asked that Council make it mandatory to the vacation, otherwise he would be opposed. City Attorney Warren noted the City cannot compel someone to give an easement to a third party; that oral agreements are not suffici- 1 ent; that if access is not sufficient to Grindeland's garage', City may be liable. Stew Capenter, 2913 Park Ave. N, inquired re granting' of easements and was advised the signed documents should be given Hearing to the City and are not binding until recorded. MOVED BY ROCKHILL, Continued SECOND SHANE, CONTINUE HEARING FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. 8:30 p.m. AUDIENCE COMMENT Leslie Funderberg, 16808 Renton-Issaquah Road, requested added ' Sale of OK Cab Agenda letter be read. Letter from OK Cab Inc. , Doretha E. Rood, Proposed President requested Council approval of the sale of the controlling interest in OK Cab Inc. to Leslie E. Funderberg in accordance with requirements of the City Code Section .5-1902. The letter noted Funderberg as owner of Silver Top Cab holding three Renton licenses. ' The letter stated reason for sale as health reasons and asked immediate action. MOVED BY SHANE, SECOND HUGHES, REFER TO PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE. CARRIED. 2 Renton City Council 8/18/80. . Page 2 Audience Comment - Continued ,Fifth and Park Steve Crane, 350 Grand Central on the Park, Seattle, representing Place Company Eugene Horbach, recalled last weeks appeal of Hearing Examiner's Appeal decision re Special Permit SP-050-80 Fifth and Park Place Co. and leases submitted for approval . MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND ROCKHILL, THE MATTER BE TAKEN FROM THE TABLE. CARRIED. Crane noted two leases were submitted to the City Attorney for review for time period of 30 years with ten year extensions for total of 40 years and that third addendum was provided for additional issues of concern; that prime leasee, Boeing Company, would cure any default of agreement; and asked the City Council to review decision of the Hearing Examiner and direct appropriate City Department to approve the parking plan. Following discussion, it was MOVED BY ROCKHILL, SECOND CLYMER, THE APPEAL OF FIFTH AND PARK PLACE COMPANY BE UP- HELD, THE SPECIAL PERMIT BE GRANTED BASED UPON THE RESTRICTION OF PARKING IN THE 20 FT. ZONE CONNECTING PARKING AREAS DESIGNATED NO. 2 AND NO. 3, AND THAT THE SIGNING BE RESPONSIBILITY OF FIFTH AND PARK PLACE COMPANY. Upon inquiry Crane noted the 2nd and 3rd floors of the building were 95% complete. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND BY REED, SUBSTITUTE MOTION, refer matter back to the Planning and Development Committee for one week. SUBSTITUTE MOTION FAILED. Rockhill noted upholding of appeal is based on new evidence, not overturning Examiner's decision. Discussion ensued regarding the Examiner's Conclusion No. 2 re 20 ft. strip running between N 4th and N 5th and need for access by emergency vehicles and number of parking stalls required. Upon inquiry, Planning Department Repre- sentative Blaylock noted 288 spaces provided, that 20 were removed by restricting parking on the alley, leaving 268 and regulations require 270 stalls. City Attorney Warren noted need for adherence to ordinances. MOTION MODIFIED BY CLYMER, AGREED BY ROCKHILL, TO SUSTAIN APPEAL OF FIFTH AND PARK PLACE COMPANY, GRANT NECESSARY 278 Parking PERMITSBASED UPON RESTRICTION OF PARKING ON ONE SIDE OF 20 FT. Stalls Approved ZONE CONNECTING PARKING AREAS DESIGNATED NO. 2 and NO. 3, AND SIGNING BE RESPONSIBILITY OF FIFTH AND PARK PLACE COMPANY. CARRIED. Councilman Stredicke requested his NO vote be recorded. Recess MOVED BY SHANE, SECOND STREDICKE, COUNCIL RECESS FOR 10 MINUTES. CARRIED. 9: 10 p.m. Council recessed at 9: 17 p.m. Roll Call : All present except Councilman Shane left the meeting due to illness. CONSENT AGENDA Councilman Stredicke requested deletion of referral to the Park Board ,, Item 7.a. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND REED, ITEM 7.d. BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA. CARRIED. (See 'latter following Consent Agenda for Item 7.d. re LID #312 West Valley Hwy. improvements.) The following items are adopted by one motion which follows those business matters included: Bid Opening Bid Opening 8/13/80 for Redwood play equipment; two bids received. Play Equipment (See attached tabulation.) Letter from Park Superintendent Ron Heiret recommended concurrence in the Park Board recommendation Contract Award to accept the low bid from Cascade Recreation Equipment in the amount of $47,278.67. The letter noted project consists of installation of play equipment at Philip Arnold, Maplewood, Highlands and Liberty Parks. Council concur. Appointment Mayor Shinpoch-reappointed Barbara Lally to the Board of Adjustment for four year term effective to 9/6/84. Refer to the Ways and Means Committee. Borrow Funds Letter from Finance Director Gwen Marshall requested a resolution be drawn to borrow $600,000 from Street Forward Thrust @ 9.00% interest per annum to be repaid no later than' 12/31/80. The letter noted funds are required in three operating areas upon receipt of property taxes: Park Fund $300,000; Street Fund $250,000; Library Fund $50,000. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Houle Corp. Summons and Complaint was filed: Houle Corporation vs. City of Renton, Court Case Maples Construction Co. and Fidelity & Deposit of Maryland regarding labor and materials charges on completion of the main headquarters Phase II of Fire Station No. 11 . Refer to the City Attorney. a 4 ;;i 'si sa., ar ' °a'. ��;�'' _L, cam' i:f:: fVf,,, 'i: l:, 1r" '4., �r i�. .;IY. \" i5 .) r4Y l'` - 1,. u ii 4' r,: - ii'! (" •i?• r Nr - lj�S: 'h '15'„ , r' N, ,. n '.,, " i i "$j"ll t: , ..,F� G• O N • ?t`, li i t • :'r( 'r. ,'''x Ca-'", r"i ti.' , +t': n h • �r ; �W HINGTO , '��' •N'T�ON A S ti OFFICE OF'�T''H�E:�:C`�I.TY�AT:T,O.RN�EY �RE, , '". ;:)'_ , f'n° `AV N E,BUI•'OINC,''.1�'O RENTON'fWASHINGTON'''+98055 255-867®,`'i''"" •POST ORFICE•pO%b26;',:;100'.2 d 6 U L r:r•„ • ;4 < o. - GG ASSISTANT` I•T.Y'ATTORNE �.' •.' LA •WRENCE:,J:LWA.RREN)'�CITV'ATTORNEY;If•'![�;'-DANIEL,KELIiO ,' ,? i" 1'n. ti,t�;: .r :'/..r ',� F,'l;Q f, o. • so� q '0. Nyr •�A • • g. w ?'• :� I,f - L�1 Y, T /� - J+.:. C 'f`A,` f.,{j,Y �E 5 y,. .i:iw -F �e , �c eb Ci Coun ;;T� Re �n,:: t" �•,Q o - vp � ,5 i. r:., •"`r ma, - Lawrence-'.:J. War - F� M. ;� 0 •Y -n':aoi l'' , . t, �d ti• ;`- , � k � ini : ,,a�' t:Fiftli`�,a aPar P1ceCoPany;�� A , • '"v ry„ � YS dt+rp I '�'Y ! p• '1•: �' -S t.',: 'Gertle en,� • • 11 s i g, . • • ':;r Yi' : : 'r c •n �e 1 'tip ;r, TYra ',Meois:; t �''�bring,.You` uP�,, o�,ld to •:.: o ' ldcexnan ��n h _ pecia �= T.�. �J�'�rem.i fortha Fifth:''and; Park.'P ce ,Buiig: ., • :� _ ('ice m`�t ��o ff r' ions`, fro hisf' , •'A ou.will-:recall froti:' r-io �o n t Hearin Examiner. ` zemand,a _ �:: . .,; :. `ou :have'�thev.'ablit r` to-revers"e,=. he- g, y the :matter back` -to 'the''Hearin 'Examiner ''."or 'affirm:`the 'Hearing _ ,>: 1="de` •'i `onl ':with_'what.'.. ou::'s'houd ,do: , M'>' "1`°,' :Examiner. . This` nenno,''wil y°' y , ',,, -d reverse':-.:the' .Hearin !E ami e ,h,k, h ., e s I t': ,n,4~r .s� r 't ��Hear x; , �If,; t'he `�Couricil�,reve ses Ie:° g'� ::F' ' " 'must::find error:;,in. .the' Hearing .Examiner,',`.'s ,finding's:. or., conclusions ,;'.s, ' ' In`':order for`'the. record to,::b.e: r' reference'::.should be made ;: ;, 1 'find ,,q};,t,,,; to;;'the'.specific �f indin .or'.„c'onclusion''�which:,'the 'Counci s;':;to„ ';J' ;�,-, •r - 'n rro e i e ��:�.b • 1 '°f �'4� '''.t^ .t .,f ' I have made'.s` ecfie'{su. es�'tioris��to`'�``tY�e;�";at�t_orney�'`for ^Mr^' Horb:acl ,',...;,, - P ,g�g- , . ,. . and •the Pi th ' , , , . f and Park�.•Pl,ac;e� Compaiiy• concern'ing -their. propo''sed;°�;:':���;''';.., Tease.: . The principal:..ar.ea:.which':,I addressed. was the assi nability'4 g �,, , of -the`.-lease,_.- to°. the':Buil,din `s` lessee' <<or: ..the.''lendin institution: financing• the building. ':' -At:;;;the'.`same; jtime, I":'strongly a ugge's,ted;,{;- '':.; that any :.breach .of the' lease, -for`non-payirient °oYf:'..rent be allowed;',A, • .. to be cured ;by the lessee of; the building•.;or: the e financial ,'': ". : :' ` institution This ,would give the :City, some security that 'thei` ti, arkin Mould. `:: continue:° TheBoein _Com ari. •would 'not ;want the:` .; y'�;: g ,:,. '`nat ed , d;:'•t e -r'.;'o'ccu, anc:` -'to:`lie-',::te'rm'i r:''`,;-,,,.�,•, arkin •'to`� 'lap s e :.an h P Y•�` - _p • g: .x .}.;t - .ref:,.,i'. iiR .r, r l` l: o Council 'sh 0 C i:t un �,,�: '%f he' a;' ric' �l s°:�"�,dec� s"ior%� ??.,:,; W .th�::r;espect'''to' the Cou ;:: 'desire 'to' reverse ,the Hearing. „Examiner',,,. .specif ic':_findings .• are' , :'- :'.a::' , ' , going to' be needed ,.concerning-:�conditions •°,,,,placed' •:on°:•the special:; ";'. permit. Of course, .the.:Council"c'an .simply.,,bdi�rect -the . special . permit be, granted: _However:, 'if:they. :'do,,:s•.o ' ;the' •following areas" '`',,7 of 'interest mill. be . ignored:c. _ ,"5 ^ 1: Whether or ,note pa rking 2stalls `can, be pro vPiodeldic'ein a'rithd:e,;;:w',,3 ',.y r objections. of the``1• '' connectin alle' - Fire :Deartmnts '� , • ta` A r fu , �7u v':. ti•., 5'` • • • 1k'' 'i :1 .h. ' ' ' ' • ' ' i. s , 1 .'1J� � i Iwa b ,Y 5: r h.., r•4: .at Sv • f' ' , :,jt .i, t.. A��, �j - 'Y. e,i.A :.3cvr''. (r r.. i'F a 1 Page ). ih August 18,; `19g,0 , T i �, 3„ � I '$.y _ f ,,, , • ,4 '.,Lvz,,, f:�,..-. all�2 'I t e. a `. 'riot .t�• ,.0 •d•.' 'n .�,, he yw y� s.` o �be se �for��}parki g, ;,. t Yie'•:nec,es it or f n'n o t' r• f r .n s ��s i f=: hat'�.�a ea o 0 y-'�� g g r a i - , - P g" - • a. t• r.. n 't 'r .3 .or` :'�c.�:.�re..�a ._o ::o d,, �.u'1 u. d. .Wlze he ot`.�!a_ o ri n :b, n sho d be re'required m or:'t o a ' to 'a t l' 'd d u n n nce���of li: a ca �n rfac;��� h e n s n .•a s e` P Y • ( f ;t in a o ark a 'e',the.' s`r �'J•, P. •g i. „1� ., r i i�;' .4 �,;� „ _ '.IBC iyl•1�r ,s -I: ri r�. r no 1 `:t'';:2° 'h:` �e •t' r` t f 4. :�hi.ethe •o t o w 3.c = 's'' r a e han 500� a t�:�•"-, .�•, h , g e , f m; ld� 1'1:;'m ''t 'c .e� of- ro �tle •bui iri i ee tie'��.d tat s' the ,, `,:.1'' . • r :`` Ordinance, since::i'''t`..is :connected"with a'rkin lot ,;;•,;�{':• p. g �,.:a''r No 3` b means of ',''the 20, ;foo.t,•stri . .yP ' `� "et �•r::t e •'u r" 'u''rem' nt. rfo a n'n' ' • 5,. Wh he h r:e `sho ld7aie .a. , eq i e r. ssig • g ,;; ,• :•� Yam.:; i' :O :parking l f' a n 's.ta1 k s 'a'�i�:.i'r'�':V .F�r, 2.r.ajli lV '�y 4 r�. . TYi Coup • i sYi'o d a ress''.''Any.'' 'or 'al o the's�e'i s�sues td .au �o�rt:' :;,�,;;�^;:;�.� xa, I,;., PP :I-'I;',.,, its' e:' Sion:;;' `,While '.ex expediency ma be ",necessar' in t1iis • instarie....,�, �.'1, ••the�F.,Council .may wish to avoid'.making these:;decisions;, :reverse the r Hearing Examiner's decision concerning the, 'permanency`• of •the'•• .f{..,4}SA,k:, lease, •'and the.'•distance from: the' bui'lding:•`of:;�parking '.l'ot, No. 2 >= f'=`= .'.'`' and remand to ,the-:.Hearing' Examiner' for: :furth'er:,findings •: ` Whatever` `', ' is done. the Council : shoul:d`„make specific;:'finding"s on the `record.''' ;:' a`';:`; so thatthe cour e_ .of, thi a cl,s s'::;matt'er.> .c n: :be;:', ear .to the .pulilic::.or �t; , 4 Y'`i[ an -reviewing i c .ur '.t• r w n t y g ^ ,. -If: you have: any 'further::f ues-t.ion.s-•� leas' e'el free to contact 'me,‘ z 'r1 y., , • r II` '. ,,• .. Laurence'; J. arren LJW:rid • • c c Mayor He 'n E X ine a 'a. x,. n. .1. g.: rt 0,nt. ''',''Planning De m }, � a 'a 4 'v l'iN�f'a �I't: ay,,,Ki • t„ • ia: ' c j ism"6 • • • • Renton City Council 8/11/80 Page 2 Audience Comment - Continued Sandy Webb, 430 Mill Ave. So. #3, requested explanation of consent agenda items re exchange of property with Winford K. Moore and revision to Parking and Loading Ordinance. Exchange of MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND SHANE, REMOVE ITEM FROM CONSENT AGENDA Property REGARDING EXCHANGE OF PROPERTY WITH WINFORD K. MOORE AND HEAR AT Winford K. Moore THIS TIME. CARRIED. Letter was read from Warren Gonnason, Board of Public Works,which noted no objections to the exhange of right-of-way with Winford K. Moore, Sixth Street Alley, Lying between Cedar Ave. S. and Mill Ave. S. and recommended referral to the City Attorney for appropriate legal action. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND STREDICKE, CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. Revisions to MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND ROCKHILL, REMOVE ITEM FROM CONSENT AGENDA Parking and REGARDING REVISIONS TO THE PARKING AND LOADING ORDINANCE. CARRIED. Loading Ordinance Letter was read from Warren Gonnason, Board of Public Works, which requested revisions to Parking and Loading Ordinance and recommended referral to the Planning and Development Committee for review. MOVED BY ROCKHILL, SECOND REED TO CONCUR IN THE RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. Recess MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND SHANE,TO RECESS, CARRIED. 9:10 p.m. Council reconvened at 9:20 p.m. Roll Call : All council members present as previously listed. CONSENT AGENDA The following items are adopted by one motion which follows those business matters included. Joint Use Study Letter from Warren Gonnason, Public Works Department, presented Water Distr. #14 RH2 Engineering proposal to perform a joint use study for Water and #63 Districts #14 and #63 in West Hill . Refer to the Utilities Committee for report back. Transfer of Letter from Warren Gonnason, Public Works Department, request Funds-Payment of for fund transfer in the amount of $33,057.16 for payment of Jones Associates Jones Associates for work performed on LID #314. Refer to LID #314 Ways and Means Committee for appropriate legislation. Transfer of Funds- Letter from Gwen Marshall , Finance Director, requested transfer of Paper Shredder funds in the amount of $2,690.52 from Fire Department repair and maintenance account to Finance to replace paper shredder. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Transfer of Funds Letter from Gwen Marshall , Finance Director, requested transfer of Salary Increase, funds in the amount of $339,048.00 for 1980 Union exempt and 21-R Longevity, Salary salary increase and fire management longevity adjustment and implemen- Survey tation of the salary survey 6/1/80. Refer to Ways and Means Committee for Resolution. - Transfer of Funds- Letter from Sharon Green, Personnel , requested transfer of funds Unemployment from cumulative reserve for payment of unemployment benefits owed Benefits for 2nd quarter 1980 in the amount of $1 ,796.72. Refer to Ways and Means Committee for resolution. Revised Rainier Letter from Delores Mead, City Clerk, 10% letter of intent to annex Annexation property to Renton (revised) Rainier Annexation; Vicinity west side of Rainier Ave. N. ,. located SW of North entrance to Renton Airport 2 acres in size' i'ncluding` street R/W. Set public meeting for September 15, 1980. Consent Agenda MOVED BY TRIMM, SECOND ROCKHILL, TO ADOPT THE CONSENT AGENDA. Approval CARRIED. OLD BUSINESS Community Services Community Services Committee Chairman Reed presented committee report Committee that the state requires group home applicants to conform to local building Group Homes and fire codes. The committee added the city has adequate legislation to assure health,safety & welfare of those receiving the services provided - by group homes.Committee recommendation was no action is necessary. MOVED BY STREDICKE,SECOND REED TO CONCUR IN COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. ) RENTON CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting August 11 , 1980 Municipal Building Monday , 8 : 00 P .M . Council Chambers MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag and called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order. ROLL CALL OF THOMAS W. TRIMM, Council President; EARL CLYMER, ROBERT HUGHES, COUNCIL RANDALL ROCKHILL, RICHARD M. STREDICKE, JOHN REED, CHARLES F. SHANE. CITY OFFICIALS BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, Mayor; MAXINE MOTOR, Deputy City Clerk; IN ATTENDANCE MIKE PARNESS, Administrative Assistant; WARREN GONNASON, Public Works Director; GORDON ERICKSEN, Planning Director; DON PERSSON, Police Dept.; LARRY WARREN, City Attorney PRESS Greg. Anderson, Renton Record Chronicle MINUTE APPROVAL MOVED BY TRIMM, SECOND CLYMER, APPROVE THE COUNCIL MINUTES OF AUGUST 4, 1980 AS WRITTEN. CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARING This being the date set and proper notices having been posted, published and mailed according to law, Mayor Shinpoch opened the Street Vacation public hearing to consider proposed street vacation, cul de sac Portion of NE 12th on NE 12th St. as requested by the City of Renton. Letter was St. read from the Board of Public Works stating the cul de sac was not necessary for traffic ci ;ulation, no easements required, VAC-6-80 value of the property $4.00/sq.ft. ,and that there were no objections to the street vacation. Mr. Warren Gonnason, Public Works Director, added that the property would be declared surplus. MOVED BY SHANE, SECOND ROCKHILL, THE PUBLIC HEARING BE CLOSED. CARRIED. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND HUGHES, THE STREET VACATION BE GRANTED AS RECOMMENDED BY THE BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS AND ONE-HALF OF THE APPRAISED VALUE BY CHARGED AND REFER TO WAYS AND MEANS. CARRIED. AUDIENCE COMMENT Gary Faull , Attorney for Brady International , requested to speak Glacier Park Co. on item regarding Glacier Park Co. Preliminary Plat PP-055-80. Preliminary Plat MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND SHANE, TO REMOVE ITEM FROM CONSENT AGENDA PP-055-80. REGARDING GLACIER PARK CO. PP-055-80: CARRIED. The item is the Hearing Examiner recommendation for approval with conditions Glacier Park Co. Preliminary Plat PP-055-80; property located SW corner of Lind SW between SW 29th St. and SW 34th. Mr. Faull , representing Brady International-purchasers of propertv,parc.el A- requested deferral of sidewalk improvements to the property. Following discussion it was MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND SHANE, DUE TO ERROR IN FINDINGS OF FACT DO NOT SUPPORT CONCLUSION OF LAW IN ITEM 2 OF THE HEARING EXAMINER' S DECISION. THEREFORE, PORTION "A" DEFERRAL FOR TWO YEARS OF SIDEWALKS AND EXTENDING EXISTING BOND FOR THE PERIOD; PORTION "B" OF PLAT BE FULFILLED AT THIS TIME WITH OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS AS AGREED TO. CARRIED. Councilman Stredicke voted no. Fifth and Park Upon request it was MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND SHANE, REMOVE ITEM Place Co.-Special FROM AGENDA REGARDING APPEAL OF HEARING EXAMINER' S DECISION RE Permit SP-050-80 SPECIAL PERMIT SP-050-80 FIFTH AND PARK PLACE CO. AND HEAR AT THIS Appeal . TIME. CARRIED. Planning and Development Minority Committee report submitted by Councilman Rockhill was read which stated that the Hearing Examiner was in error and recommended a• lease guaranteeing the parking would be available or the first floor area be modified for parking. Planning and Development Committee (Majority) Report was read finding no error in fact or law and affirmed the decision of the Hearing Examiner of denial . Stephen Crane, Attorney representing Eugene Horbach, 350 Grand Central on the Park, Seattle, submitted lease for 30 years with two five year options (total of 40 years) for the parking areas. Following discussion it was MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND SHANE, TABLE THE MATTER FOR ONE WEEK,REFER TO THE CITY TTORNEY FOR RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. r • 1, � 1' • ^`' x; t y u7 • YPLANNIN'G 'AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEEI :,;,. x ( . COMMITTEE 'RE PORT ' 41 1 80.AUGUST'° 1` - 9 • F F AND .PAR'K P CE`.CO SP=O 50-80' (Eugene. Ho."rback APPEAL. I TH LA - 5 ( g ) ' �.� referred $� .4 '$0 r'' . The Planning and ;Developmen't, Committee has considered the appeal. of the Land Use Hea • ring Examin-Exam .s. decision dated, July 16, 1980, and, by a t majority vote,, 'finding no `error` in fact or.. law, recomm• ends,' that' the, City Council.. adop.t;°the Findings', Conclusions and• Decision, of,`.the 'Hearing. Examiner; and offa rm '',the.`-decisian :of sthe. Hearing Examiner. . 1, 1,1 - .I YY • Randy Rockh i,l l ;: .Cha►rman .. John 'Reed y - {ri Earl Clymer �.xr - - j. .rrt i 1� ;t_ fit' _ 1- y ' }f :," t✓ 4 LN - 1 _ s :r * 1. 'k•.:4', `4` ! r Y e z t;- ] "l i } ir.- i `_`trr ti• 5 :Ko rLn�y t`'45`, )q' : am `'tr4 :v N ' - iih4r1, f S- ----, • / , - '.:PLANNI NG AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE • . MINORITY COMMITTEE REPORT AUGUST 11 , 1980 , APPAL - FIFTH AND PARK PLACE CO - SP-050-80 (Eugene Horback) referred 8/4/80) , •, .1 .. . , As''a result of the'extensive review. of th? subject .appeal ,.. the Planning and Development Committee Minority Report finds, +-he Hearing Examiner was in error,,,..n.1 St at i ng parking i s more than 500 . .. I' from the building since Parking lots #2 :;?..,','''''.'.''',.'i''i'l•:::- . .": lot #2, . ' and #3 plus. the 20!, corridor,,.. comprise one Parcel: of land physically contiguous,.. . . and legallyunder one ownership 2-11';‘Objecting to : ropertY.;:lease-:Csn' the basis of perthenence. City policy states that ' the parking area.my.be leased'.,., A lease,-. by definition, is for a specified period of time. No definition. •.'"of permanence is presently contained in the city Ordinance. The appellant,was i ,:'.- nformedH'in writing by an agent of the city, that ,a lease for a minimum of fivel,.,-ye0's' 'durationwould be needed. The appellant furnished leastsof ''''''''''' -'.",-.. '• :ten years plus fives: '..-YeP±.9;13 extensions.tiOnal -. ';,',,c'-q,..;,, '.' ' . - , :,, „ .:..,,,,-: ".;:.-.: -'' ,-.. . „. ' • - 'I ' • due to parking lots. The‘.-, 3. Stating pLi-ope -tY.;'.i ,value. Int', allthe'aberelawiu consideredl depreciatedpn projecte parking and building.:n?14..., ' 1 , evidence7f: this, ., -...„• .t depreciating project r'property value i in the area was i7o$:uacneddn.° 1 :''• .'.' ,. ,: residential. neighborhood 4-' :Stating these:pa parking areas', would -harm the.. single family less than 17% of the li'•'?,,T),,,..:,',.„,,,,: .-- .',: in which they are located., ;Maps ,were shown which indicated. . - - property in the,, iipediqt! a , ' is' 'q :a, ...::7ir1!1e,,.!am!)..-'-',:77',.!1,..,,:11771,...7,..1.,:,. 17t11r4 .,,-, :::::',,H.'.,: ' . '; ' :" .. ::'1' :':''' '' .::':-';:' .... ''.'':.:. ,,', -,„ . ; ;', : • . ;:.- ! ..;.: 1 ::. .r : 5.-‘...:4,:, Stating that the random search for parking by workers 1.6 the building would cause "noise, air pollution and hinder traffic,:flow." ,. Sincesome' the p pal rkingwoulci bee§s19.,:ned ! the remainder would not be 9f 9. 'volume ,._,.,97,:: 777,..gf to affect:1 - . present traffic ,:. , volume on Park A./enbe .,;14cir.th' '','':,.',.,.'s,,,i,:', „ ,-.,•,-,-;.,,,,;,::•',,.:;,,,....,. . ,,,, ,::,::-..:'•;-,.„..2.,-..,-,....,..,,,,,...,,,,, ,,:,, .,,,,,:,..,, , ,..,, this Special,,,, ,..:. ...-'-'''''.. "','',i-',.,'.;:;::...' ', . ,•f .. ,,,,,,: ;,- , . -.,,,,, .::'''', ..; ' ."' Report -that: Development Minority . , ,- ••,. ; , ,' : ,,, . ,, _ . , . , „ . 'f;,k';;;;;.;, -,,,'-•'',1i 'i s recommended .bY the Planning.1 ) :;:ref'; '",;•-• Permit be grantedsubject ot:one of the .fO;11;,y,./ing. .,..restrictions:.•,,,.,,:..,,,,,,:-/,:.:-';',. , „ • ,1' ;';'-- Leases for.pa r,k i n 9'''areat II'P''''of' n atUre which would guarantee to''the,' City that, in case of default by the '',16as'ee:", the ,land in 'quest 16.ii.could not be period t,:„:bepse,:,9`ff9nrpotnyl,e, purpose other than; parking` : for the FifthPark:7and BUIId!n9. f 0 than twenty years f..-,r°m' dteCIF•-...71:i!in:!n;:.1,ss, other.:,,....,,:u.:.:.,..;; 7b1...7-. ,property.,,'. wasina:17,, available.,.: -.-,A,',1 '.'-‘,..!':::::.:,-,-'-- ''. =:, ..,','.•-•.. ..,-,!: ,,..„,-,;:-. '[.,./, ,...''-‘,,a A ' : ',.; -.,.. -.,:::::',.,-.'1......,,-;.,.,: -:•.,:,-'. : ',:re: i :--, - •,, ',. . , , ' .., , -::.'2.-,:"..';'.::!..:,..-:' ;:..:...„,,,,. ::,:, ..-,!.'-,:,,,,„. =,.. .-':-.':.. -.-!.:.,:. -''., ,•-•: ‘. - ' • a..r,.9i,-- ei.kt'illidiPg ',.t allow' o - .- . 2'4:16orire.4 .0fL.the,F! It - . .. '.';:,',-'''.;• ,:'7:,•.i,. : The• appellant modify. the first, , sufficient location ..so that '19t° #2 would c1 :t!?:t., 1-i! needed.',',...':''' ','`;',': ' : - "..' : -','..-2.,': 1_':,',,;,_'":. ;;:,, ,:.:,-:,- :''1:-?: :; '',-t;'• i) ' t' itsearliest' - convenience, clarify. 1.t -is further recommended that' the,, . , - ,' CitY ,CoLIPP .. . a . •,, ... ' "`11:-'eS'used in.. Chapter words. , • and "permanent"..,.., 14-22°9, ...:1:'.'1'.'1,::: the intent and definition :Of :the - "lease".,,,.., ,. ,,,,...... :' ‘,,,:.;;;;;,,.;.,2:„:,..;:...:„..,,.:-,,...:;,,,,,,, ,;,-,,,,,,,:,..--;,:,;-',,...-;,, 9 c theCity Code- of' General: Ordinances. -;,..,,,„... -,:.:,,-,; ':.:,,', :..,.‘,„•,,,,,,;,-.:, .,.,:,.,:.'-,,.0-.,,-,,:.,„....:;,-,:-i-.:' ,,,, ,:,, ',.,-.-, ,.,--, , ,„_:,,,, .:, - ..: , , : . , . .. , „ . ,,,., ,„, ',,,,..:. .77, -.' ;:;,..',,,,,. :,,•,„.,,,•,,,,,,,-,,,,,,,-;: -,-.,,. .,. ,-....,. ... 2,.2,7-;.,,;',.,,,..,,,,,,::,,,,)„,,,•;:,,..:`,/;,.., ,:,,,,,, , ,, , „. .,.., ., ' , • , •,,- .„,",?4,,:-',,,,... :„, .' , , , - -.',•., - y.: .:. ;,.-::,?: ,. , ‘-e,-,:',-,-,..,,, ,.,„-,..,,,f.,-,:.• ,,',1-,;:',... '','''i,j''.‹ ')' 2'.' ..,, 1 ,,:?1 ,W;:,,' l,:f = ; ' . ,, ' • '.: ,' 1, ''''''j ; ',.• 2','7".,7S,,,:• :-; -,' '''''''':'"% i , ' " -' kockhi 11 , Chairman l';'-.'..3,1'":',.,: ','1,-',....'` .'',.'.. .` '--: - . ' -',: :. - ' :,-., '::,,....-; ;z -,•,..:•.;1',...-,;:f.;.,.,2-.:,....`;;, :,-,-‘,'.' ,',r;'"..,.:-. .-,(:,;':::'; : :., ,':.,.'.:::',';:', *.'•,,'.,,,: ''.', ,,,,Y ', ,::i ', ,,I .; i ,.., , :,,i ::4 .' ,i,y ''' $:!C.':: :'''''' ''''': ' . '../ - ': '''!,',.:' '‘,: s',r''',':':',:'%"-V':'': ''.2::!''::'''./,'i-'...::: :;':';'.'')':'; '''1,..'::‘.'''' :'';'-. ..'.."'','V: ..'i,';';T1.,:::;',,''';)::'L.' •''1';',.,-:1; ;&..'7.'''.'..!,-'''',;'I-','C',•.',,', .:'-2'',.i.. .'• kV,';',IY',`,','-`','i, : " '.' ,1 t.':: .:',2*.; ,''''-24'' ''- ','. .':''':!:"':':-, •:'; ''''':':-.,,,:;''''''':1,'":',?•:.‘1 ..;,•-•;,1:''''''';•::::;,:;;''''!":2;;::":':1;:',1,4,;).4 .:: ::.!:, ,,3';:: : !.:., ,C1 :',14-,,,' ;:::,',,r..11::',;:T'i,]:`; ',Z,:.:;,:i:.;,:;;;;';',,'!",-,:::.j,':'.Y,:,.3;',::::Y,.:Y1'1,:)':', '.;';',7:-:.., '2,• :,': ' .•;,, „; ss For.Use By City Clerk's Office Only • 1 A. I . # 7 a._ AGENDA ITEM RENTON CITY COUNCIL MEETING 3�a'iL'f iR'C SUBMITTING Dept./Div./Bd./Comm. Land Use Hearing Examiner For Agenda Of August 11 , 1980 (Meeting Date) Staff Contact Marilyn Petersen (Name) Agenda Status: SUBJECT: File No. S'P-050-80; Fifth and Park Consent Place Company; Special Permit; Appeal of Public Hearing Correspondence Examiner's Decision. Ordinance/Resolution Old Business X Exhibits: (Legal Descr. , Maps, Etc.)Attach New Business Study Session A. Examiner's Report, 7-16-80 Other B. Letter of Appeal , 7-30-80 • C. City Clerk' s Letter, 7/30/80 Approval : Legal Dept. Yes No N/A X • COUNCIL ACTION RECOMMENDED: N/A Finance Dept. Yes No. N/A X Other Clearance l FISCAL IMPACT: Expenditure Required ; $ Amount $ Appropriation- Budgeted Transfer Required $ SUMMARY (Background information, prior action and effect of implementation) (Attach additional pages if necessary.) The Examiner's report regarding the subject matter was published on July 16, 1980, and a 14-day appeal period established to expire on July 30, 1980. On July 30, 198,0, an appeal was filed with the City Clerk by the applicant accompanied by the required $25.00 fee. In accordance with ordinance requirements, the matter will be placed on the City Council agenda of August 11 , 1980. PARTIES OF RECORD/INTERESTED CITIZENS TO BE CONTACTED: See page 9 of the Examiner's report. SUBMIT THIS COPY TO CITY CLERK BY NOON ON THURSDAY WITH DOCUMENTATION. q) Renton City Council 8/4/80 Page 2 Consent Agenda - Continued Transfer of 1 Letter from Ted Bennett, Finance Dept. , requested transfer of funds Funds- Highlands from repair and maintenance account to capital outlay to replace Fire Station heating system in Highlands Fire Station in the amount of $4,422.60. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Appropriation- Letter from Chief Darby/Capt. Bourasa, Police Dept. , requested Washington Traffic ordinance to appropriate Washington Traffic Safety Commission Safety Commission Grant Funds in the amount of $12,000. Project title: Northwestern Grant University Traffic Institute Training (9 month course of instruction) . Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Lazetti Letter from City Clerk's Office noted King County acceptance of Annexation Lazetti Annexation and its finalization. (BRB#900) Information. Appropriation-Fire Letter from Fire Chief Geissler requested ordinance to appropriate Dept. Insurance insurance settlement on damaged vehicle into Fire Dept. budget in Settlement the amount of $2,860.00. Refer to• Ways and Means Committee. Fifth & Park Appeal filed by Eugene Horbach re Fifth and Park Place Co. Special Place Co. Permit SP-050-80 and the Land Use Hearing Examiner's decision Appeal SP-050-80 dated July 30, 1980. Refer to Planning and Development Committee. Consent Agenda MOVED BY TRIMM,SECOND SHANE,TO ADOPT THE CONSENT AGENDA AS AMENDED. Approval CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE AND CURRENT BUSINESS LID 307 Bond Letter was read from Seattle Northwest Securities Corp. re Issue Local Improvement District No. 307 Bond Issue in the amount of $492,768.87. Bonds are to be dated August 1 , 1980 and mature August 1 , 1992 and are to bear interest payable annually at the rate of 9.40%. Finance Dept. recommendation was approval of Seattle NE Securities offer. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND ROCKHILL, • REFER TO WAYS AND 'MEANS 'COMMITTEE FOR ORDINANCE. (See later adoption of Ordinance #3460) . MOTION CARRIED. Boeing Company- Letter was read from Board of Public Works which recommended Variance request * that the variance requested by the Boeing Company be granted for Overhead subject to concurrence by the council.Requested overhead coaxial cables Coaxial Cables cables to provide communications interconnection among various Renton facilities. Approval subject to condition that facilities be under9rounded when undergrounding in the area is accomplished. Mr. McLean of the Boeing Co. handed. out a map showing course cable will follow. MOVED BY SHANE, SECOND TRIMM, TO REFER MATTER TO THE TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Discontinuance Letter was read from Warren Gonnason, Public Works Dept. , verified of LID #318 petition,presented 7/28/80,protesting LID 318 in the amount of 6R.17% cost N. 30th St. of. improvement. Therefore, it was recommended that LID #318 be voided due to 60% .or more of property protesting per RCW 35.43.180. MOVED BY SHANE, SECOND CLYMER, VOID LID 318. CARRIED. Joepete McCaslin The Land Use Hearing Examiner recommended approval of short plat, Short Plat 034-80 denial of exception and waiver. Property located west side of E-035-86, W-036-70 Union Ave. NE approximately 1820 feet south of NE 4th St. Appeal Appeal was filed by Joepete McCaslin. Planning and Development Committee Chairman Rockhill presented committee report finding no error in fact or law and recommended council affirm the decision of the Hearing Examiner. . MOVED BY ROCKHILL, SECOND REED,TO CONCUR IN THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Dahlby Rezone . The Land Use Hearing Examiner recommended approval with restrictive R-044-80 covenants of the Thomas Dahlby Rezone R-044-80,GS-6000 to L-1 . Appeal Property located 1402 Maple Ave. SW. Appeal filed by Kathleen and Thomas Dahlby. Planning and Development Committee Chairman Rockhill presented committee report finding that the Examiner is in error as a matter of fact in his finding regarding landscaping. OF THE CITY OF RENTON `$ ® MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 puill rn BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • DELORES A. MEAD 0'9 CITY CLERK 0 �Q 9FD SEPSE�� August 1 , 1980 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON) ) ss. COUNTY OF KING ) MAXINE MOTOP;Dep.City Clerk of the City of Renton, being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says that she is a citizen of the United States and a resident of the State of Washington, over the age of 21 and not a party to nor interested in this matter. That on the 1st day of August, 1980, at the hour of 5:00 P.M. , your affiant duly mailed and placed in the United States Post Office at Renton, King County, Washington, by first class mail , to all parties of record, a true and correct NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED BY STEPHEN J. CRANE, ATTORNEY, FOR EUGENE HORBACH, FIFTH AND PARK PLACE CO. , SPECIAL PERMIT SP-050-80. Maxine E Motor, Deputy City Clerk SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE me this 1st day of August, 1980. \ \\,cA.e Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing in Renton st NEET COPIES TO: SENT X CITY ATTORNE ' S.:OFFICE RECORD CHRONICLE (PRESS) MAYOR' S OFFICE V CITY COUNCIL ) fZ. /, FINANCE DEPARTMENT '( HEARING EXAMINER NI/ ,X PLANNING DEPARTMENT x PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR PARK DEPARTMENT PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT X POLICE DEPARTMENT bon Persso,7 X K /Aii.1e/ lir7<<).&rnvrn, eMIN/SUM ill 010 ni Zill/271 OF R �� 41, o THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 Ala n 0i BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • DELORES A. MEAD 090 co. CITY CLERK O Q 9�TFC SEP1.0 July 30,, 1980 APPEAL FILED BY STEPHEN:J. .CRANE, ATTORNEY, FOR EUGENE HORBACH RE: Appeal of Land Use Examiner' s Decision Dated July 16, 1980, Fifth & Park Place Co: ; ..Special Permit SP-050-80 To Parties of Record: Appeal; o-f Land Use Hearing Examiner's decision has been filed with the City Clerk this date, along with the proper fee of $25.00, pursuant to Titl0F, Ch. 30, City Code as amended. The City Code requires the appeal must be set forth in writing. The written appeal and all other pertinent documents will be reviewed by the Council ' s Planning and Development Committee. Please contact the Council Secretary 235-2586, for date and time of the committee meetings if so desired. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the above-referenced appeal will be considered by the Renton City Council at its r.egular 'meeting of August 11 , 1980, at 8:00 p.m. in + the.iCouncil Chambers, Second Floor, Renton, Municipal Building, 200 Mill Ave. South. Yours very truly, CITY OF RENTON ?")-11-4 Makine_E..:.Moto,r., Deputy,Ciity Clerk MEM/st , • CITY OF RENTON . FINANCE DEPARTMENT No. 1463.2. RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 `-� C, 19 RECEIVED OF • 1 •�� � � fJ ,66 < < 1/ - TOTAL (? GWEN E. MARSHALL, FINANCE DIRECTOR BY 0 Th1ni)b-- - ,.� 0 JUL 1980 (51 EDP, CRANE,CARROLL,BOESE,DUNHAM,STAMPER g DAILY c rz), 4 .°1c-D,\ CITY of REPJTON ��I ATTORNEYS AT LAW >y CLERK'S OFFICE 's" 3S0 GRAND CENTRAL ON THE PARK 40,/ di\ / 2I6 FIRST AVENUE SOUTH \ �91(t jn�� // SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 89104 fb 7 MAX EOESE (209) 292-909❑ CABLE:INTERLAW TERRENCE A.CARROLL STEPHEN J.CRANE STEVEN R.DAILY DOUGLAS 5.DUNHAM July 30, 1980 KEVIN C.STAMPER Clerk Hand delivered City Council City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Re : Appeal of a denial by the Hearing Examiner of an application for a special permit relating to using auxilliary parking lots Dear City Council: Enclosed please find the appeal by the Fifth and Park Place Company of the denial by the Hearing Examiner of an application for a special permit to allow the Company to ,met its off-street parking requirements through the securing of _ space in five auxiliary parking lots . . For reasons outlined below and in our appeal, we believe that the permit should have been issued so that final occupancy approval can be granted as soon as possible by the Building Department . Frankly, if such approval is not granted in the immediate near future, there exists a substantial risk that the Boeing Company (the sole tenant of the pre-leased building) will move to a building in another jurisdiction. I. ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL This appeal brings before the City Council the issue of whether the applicant has proposed a plan to meet the off-street parking requirement of the City of Renton for his building which is not detrimental to the health, safety and welfare of both the general public and the surrounding neighborhood . The applicant , as well as the City Planning Department (with one exception) , both believe that the parking plan is compatible with the public interest . The Hearing Examiner did not agree and rendered a decision to that effect . As provided by City ordinances, we have appealed that decision to the Council and request that it be reversed at the earliest posssible opportunity. !// Clerk Page 2 July 30, 1980 Specifically, the lot upon which the applicant 's building is located does not have sufficient vacant land area immediately contiguous to it to provide the necessary number of parking spaces required for a building of its size. The number of required parking spaces is 270. The applicant can provide only 66 on the building site lot , therefore must secure at least 204 spaces in so-called auxiliary parking lots . The applicant has assembled , at great financial . 'cost and substantial effort , five lots within a one-block, easy walking distance from the building in order to provide the necessary or required parking spaces . He did not , significantly, exercise his right to apply for a variance or other waiver from the off-street parking requirements as is routinely done throughout the City and the central business district in particular. Moreover, the applicant voluntarily set his building back from Park Avenue North (a "zero lot line" could have been used ) , which reduced the number of parking spaces available on the site and created the need for auxilliary parking spaces. II. BACKGROUND The Fifth and Park Place Building is a three-story office building designed to provide 54, 000 square feet of leased space to house approximately 270 Boeing Commercial Airplane personnel affiliated with their product development and warranty divisions . The estimated value of the land and building after construction is approximately Three Million Dollars ($3, 000,000) . The project site is near the intersection of Fifth and Park Avenue North, north of downtown Renton. A delapidated steel corrigated structure existed on the site prior to its removal to allow the construction of- the subject building. III. COMMUNITY AND MUNICIPAL BENEFITS The office building and proposed parking plan present the City of Renton with an opportunity to achieve substantial benefits for the surrounding neighborhood and City merchants , as well as the City itself. These benefits are both financial and non-economic in nature. r/r/i . • Clerk Page 3 July 30, 1980 Economic benefits As indicated above, the proposed office building and underlying property are expected to be valued at approximately $3, 000,000 when completed . Based upon current property tax rates , the property tax generated revenue for the City of Renton will approximate $9,627 annually. Although precise calculations are not possible, it is generally assumed by professional economic analysists that the City's share of the sales taxes generated from the estimated annual payroll of $6, 750,000 earned by the Boeing employees to be housed in the building will be $8, 606 [According to one economic analysist , the sales tax revenues to the city could be estimated as follows : 270 employees x $25, 000 average salary = $6, 750, 000 less 60% for taxes and non-disposable items = $2, 700,000 in spendable income x 75% for taxable sales = $2, 225, 000 of sales potentially subject t.o a sales tax x .00425 as the City's share of sales revenue = $8, 606] . The City's direct annual benefits from property and sales tax revenues can thus be estimated at $18, 233. Of potentially much greater significance to the City is the fact that up to $2, 700, 000 of spendable income could be anticipated to be circulated to the City merchants if the building is allowed to continue towards completion and occupancy (which is dependent upon obtaining the special permit) . Moreover , the City's approval of this building will serve as an additional anchor to secure that future Boeing facilities are located in Renton, rather than constructed in South Center or in the Sea-Tac Airport area . Beyond the property and sales tax revenue from this building, the property values of surrounding properties are expected to rise as a result of this most modern and substantial project . Again, the previous structure was a rather unsightly corrigated building which did not add to the neighborhood character (see discussion below) . And , since the building carries with it the need for additional parking spaces , the parking lots are Vby necessity a key part of the proposed improvement and property valuation increase. Clerk Page 4 July 30, 1980 Neighborhood benefits As acknowledged by both the City Planning Department and the Hearing Examiner, the immediate (two or three block) neighborhood is going through (indeed , has substantially completed ) a transition from a once modest mixed use neighborhood to a nearly exclusive commercial use area . The effects of some of the relatively undesirable visible effects of earlier, unplanned commercialization are represented by the auto repair shops and equipment storage yards which will be replaced through conversion of these areas by the applicant to landscaped and striped parking lots for the office building. IV. A PPELLANT'S RESPONSES TO THE CONCERNS OF THE HEARING EXAMINER The attached appeal sets forth our formal or technical exceptions or objections to the findings , conclusions and decision of the Hearing Examiner in this case. We have attempted to summarize and highlight the major concerns of the Examiner and our response to those concerns in the discuss-ion below : Technical concerns The Examiner stated in his decision two concerns of a technical nature. First , he based his denial of the application for use of the southern-most parking lot , designated as number 2, on the grounds that the lot is greater than 500 feet from the building it is intended to serve. This conclusion ignores the fact that lot no. 2 is connected to and part of lot no. 3 which is within the required 500 feet perimeter. The connection of the two lots is of both a legal and functional character . Legally, the two lots are part of one ownership parcel which 'is leased to the applicant under one lease . Functionally, the two lots ' are tied together by the proposed parking plan wherein the traffic will flow between lots (indeed , the existing traffic flow connects the two areas . The second technical objection of the Examiner is that the applicant has not presented evidence of "permenance" of the auxilliary parking lots. This objection is unfairly raised under the circumstances of' this case. The applicant. was V Clerk Page 5 July 30, 1980 advised , both orally and in writing by the City Planning Department , that if he could secure leases for auxilliary parking lots of five (5) years that he would have met the time requirements applicable under City codes. The applicant then went beyond the City's request and obtained leases for 10 years with options to renew and to purchase. It was only at the public hearing on the application for the special permit that the applicant learned for the first time that the City desired to obtain assurances of parking lot availability longer than term of the lease negotiated by the applicant . Certainly, the equities in this instance dictate that the City be prevented from changing the stated "rules of the game" after a citizen has gone to great expense in reliance upon such rules in negotiating a long term lease involving substantial sums of money. Moreover , the City has likely exposed itself to a possible claim for damages if the special permit is not granted under these circumstances . See Haslund v. Seattle, 86 Wn. 2d 607 (1976) , the so-called "Roanoke Reef" case where a judgment for $2. 89 million dollars was obtained by a property owner who relied upon City actions to his substantial detriment . See also, Rogers v. Toppenish, 23 W.App. 554 (1979) . Subjective concerns In addition to the above two technical .concerns, the Examiner based his denial upon a belief that the proposed parking plan could be detrimental to the aesthetic "quality" of the neighborhood and could lower property values. There are several responses to this concern. First , there was absolutely no evidence presented at the public hearing that property values would be lowered by construction of a $3 million dollar office building and the consequent necessity in this case to secure auxilliary parking lots . Common knowledge of real estate values in recent years , together with the addition of a valuable office building and the consequent conversion and removal of. auto and equipment storage yards, cannot possibly pose a threat to property values . Second , the Examiner placed a great deal of emphasis upon the alleged harm which could befall a "single family residential neighborhood " if the parking plan were approved . The assumption, at times explicit and implicit throughout the decision, was that the area surrounding the building site and the proposed auxilliary parking lots is of a single family residential character. As shown on the attached maps , which r �\ Clerk Page 6 July 30, 1980 indicate both existing uses and zoning districts , the area can not reasonably be• called single-family in character. In fact , the amount of property in single-family use is only 17% according to the applicant 's engineers, Ewing and Associates . Third , an apparently key factor in the Examiner 's decision was a statement made after the close of the public hearing by a representative of the Boeing Company by telephone to the Examiner. According to the Examiner, this statement was to the effect that contrary to the testimony made by Boeing at the hearing, they do not assign parking stalls to their employees . The Examiner, based upon this statement , then concluded that there could be a "recurrent random search for available parking" by office workers which would "cruise between the various lots in an attempt to locate parking." He then stated his concern that this assumed search would generate additional noise and air pollution and hinder traffic flows. As noted in the attahed letter from Mr . Richard Ranta , Facilities Planning Manager, dated July 29, there will be an assignment of at least 40 spaces for management personnel . As testified at the public hearing, Boeing has an additional program of encouraging car pooling and mass transit which should further cut down the actual number of parking stalls needed in this case . There will undoubtedly be an assignment of visitor parking spaces which will minimize the so -called cruising or hunt for additional spaces . Finally, the City has issued , under the State Environmental Policy Act , a determination that the proposed building and its parking plan will not have a significant adverse impact upon the environment - it is thus odd that this concern about neighborhood impacts has been elevated to the point of being a basis for denial of the permit application. V. CONCLUSION For all of the reasons outlined above and in the attached appeal, the applicant respectfully requests that the City Council reverse the decision of the Hearing Examiner and approve the parking plan for use of auxilliary parking lots . Such approval will secure substantial neighborhood and Clerk Page 7 July 30, 1980 City-wide benefits of both an economic and non-financial character. Approval will also affirm the principle that citizens can rely upon the assurances given them by City personnel that if they take certain actions there will be compliance with applicable provisions of the City code . Very truly yours, CRANE CARROLL, BOESE, DUNHAM, STAMPER & DAILY to en J. Cr e S JC:c ba Attachments : Appeal CRANE,CARROLL,BOESE,DUNHAM,STAMPER n DAILY ATTORNEYS AT LAW 3S0 GRAND CENTRAL ON THE PARK 2I6 FIRST AVENUE SOUTH SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98104 MAX SOESE (206) 292-9090 CAGLE:INTERLAW TERRENCE A.CARROLL STEPHEN J.CRANE STEVEN R.DAILY DOUGLAS G.DUNHAM KEVIN C.STAMPER THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON In the Matter of the Application ) FILE NO. SP-050-80 by Fifth & Park Place Company for ) a Special Permit Re Auxilliary ) APPEAL OF THE DECISION OF , Parking Lots ) LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER COMES NOW the applicant in the above captioned matter, Fifth & Park Place Company, through its attorney, Stephen J. Crane, and formally requests that the decision rendered by the Hearing Examiner on July 16 in the above referenced file be reversed for the following reasons: I. ERRORS OF FACT The following errors of fact are contained in the "Findings" section of the above referenced decision: Finding No . 7. The applicant did in fact obtain what he believed constituted City acceptance of his proposed enclosing of the bottom floor of the building. Specifically, he was told by representatives of the Building Department that all he needed to do was to secure additional or auxilliary parking lots in the neighborhood , each with a minimum 5 year lease, and submit evidence of such action to the Department to obtain approval . Finding No . 8. It is totally misleading for the Examiner to state that the applicant has proposed to provide the required parking in a series of separate and /or connected parking lots "within a four block area". In fact , as shown by the map attached to the opinion itself, the lots are all within at least one and one-half (1 1/2) effective or actual block radius of the project site to which the drivers and passengers will be traveling. f • J Finding No . 13. The Examiner 's findings in this paragraph are highly slanted and misleading. Indeed , in some instances they are also factually inaccurate . Moreover, the map attached to the decision of the Examiner is also misleading, slanted and factually inacurrate. Because the "neighborhood character" was a key factor in the Examiner 's opinion, the true character of the immediately surrounding areas are set forth in detail below and in the attached maps showing the neighborhood uses and zoning in the neighborhood of the proposed parking lots: A. Lot 2. North of lot 2 is the commercial enterprise, Circus-Circus Fabricating. West of the subject property is an ARCO service station. East of lot 2 is the school yard . South of lot 2, across North 4th Street , is an accounting office . B. Lot 3. West of lot 3, across Park Avenue, is one not 4) single family residence and parking for condominiums. South of lot 3 is a State-operated halfway house. East of the property is the school district maintenance building and equipment parking lot . North is one residential use (however, north of that residence are two commercial buildings . C. Lot 4. North of lot 4 is Gary's Automotive. West of the subject property is a single-family residence and an upholstery business . South of lot 4 are two residential units. East of the lot 4, across Park Avenue North, is the building site • itself. D. Lot 5. West of lot 5, across Pelly Avenue, is an order multiple-family residential unit . South is a single family residence . To the east is Gary's Automotive. To the north, across North 6th Street , is "Mother 's Park. " E. Lot 6. East of lot 6, across Park Avenue North, is Kenny 's Automotive (to the east of Kenny 's Automotive are parking lots for Pacific Car and Foundary) . South, across North 6th Street , is Gary's Automotive. West and North is Mother 's Park. Finding No . 14. The statement by the Examiner that the halfway house "informally used part of lot 3 for off-street parking" is misleading, as is the finding that the leasing of lot 3 could cause the house to "become" an illegal non-conforming use without adequate off-street parking. In point of fact , the halfway house is already illegal since it does not provide for adequate off-street parking. Finding No . 15. The Examiner 's statement that "much of the area, though, is still used for single family uses" is both vague and inconsistent with the facts . As shown by the attachments to this appeal, the area is deeply into the so-called "transition" to higher density residential and commercial uses. In terms of percentages , the area is only 17 percent (17 7) devoted to single family uses according to the applicant 's engineers. Finding No . 16. The Examiner 's statement that the Fire Department has "indicated that a 12-foot access land must be provided through the applicant 's leased property" is misleading and conclusionary. First , the Department 's representative at the hearing did not indicate what the purpose of the fire lane would be or how that purpose could not be adequately served by Park Avenue. Second , there was never any reference, despite requests from the applicant and his representative, as to the legal authority for the request . Finding No. 17. Contrary to the Examiner 's statement , both testimony made at the public hearing by a representative of Boeing, Mr . Robert Yakas , and by written communication from his superior, Mr. Richard Ranta , attached hereto , clearly indicate that Boeing's specific plans in this case are to have assigned parking for a significant number of employees working at the Fifth and Park Place building. Finding 20. The lease agreement does not provide that the lease becomes terminated if the property is sold to someone other than the applicant , as stated by the Examiner. The lease only becomes terminated if, following expiration of its terms , the applicant in this case does not either renew it or exercise his opt ion to purchase the lots. Moreover, the Finding does not reflect the fact that the applicant was mislead by both oral and written representations of the City Planning Department to believe that a lease of five (5) years would be of adequate duration to meet City y standards . Attached hereto is a letter dated June 4, from Mr . Roger Blaylock, assistant planner for the City, stating that if the applicant secured five year leases he would have met his "permanance" requirement . OBJECTIONS TO CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Conclusion No. 2. The Examiner places great weight behind the alleged concerns of the City Fire Department representative. This reliance is poorly based for two main reasons . First , there has been no citation of legal or other authority for the proposition that a City Department can effectively "condemn" a 12' alleyway through private property without payment of just compensation to the injured property owner. Second , and more importantly, there has been no showing that the fire lane is necessary to protect the public health, safety or welfare of the neighborhood residents or any particular structure. Third , the Fire Department 's concerns are compatible with the proposed use of the leased property for parking lots 2 and 3 since angle parking on the 20' strip would still allow for passage by fire and emergency vehicles . Thus , in effect , a fire lane can and has been provided for by the applicant . Conclusion No. 3. The applicant takes strong exception to the conclusion reached by the Examiner that parking lots 2 and 3 are "independent of each other". In point of fact , and as testified by several witnesses at the public hearing, these two lots are very much interconnected and not independent of each other. They are le ally connected as a result of their common owners in fee title by the Dobson Building Company and the ownership of a leasehold interest in both lots by the applicant . Second , they are functionally connected by the existence of a 20' wide strip of property, which serves as an existing passageway for both emergency and non-emergency vehicles and which can also serve as a conduit for automobile traffic parking in the two lots . Conclusion No . 4. The applicant objects to the Examiner 's conclusion that the proposed parking. plan "does not meet the required permancy requirements spelled out by Section 4-2209." First , the permancy requirement is unfortunately not spelled out - if it were, then perhaps we would not be in this particular situation. Rather, only a general statement that the arrangement should evidence some degree of permenancy is contained in the above referenced section of the Code . Second , the City through its agents in the Planning Department , have clearly mislead the applicant into believing that a five (5) year requirment was all that the City required in terms of leases . Based upon these representations , the applicant expended substantial sums of money and effort in securing leases of less than a duration of perpetuity but more than what he was told was the minimum in this case . The only way for the City to minimize the potential damages which the applicant might well be able to prove he suffered as a result of the representations made by the Planning Department would be for the City to approve the parking plan devised by the applicant and based upon statements made by City officials. Finally , there was no testimony at the hearing nor is there any support in the findings by the Examiner for the proposition. that replacement parking would be either 'difficult or impossible to locate". Indeed , the applicant was able within a . very short time period and within a block radius to find parking for over 214 cars on lots not connected with the building site . Conclusion No . 5. The conclusion reached by the Examiner that the proposed parking plan does not "well serve" the public health, safety and welfare is strongly objected to for reasons . indicated above and other reasons as well . First , as indicated above, assigned parking has not been ruled out - both at the hearing and by the letter attached hereto, the Boeing Company has stated its intent to assign parking stalls . Therefore, the Spector conjured up by the Examiner of "recurrent random search for available parking", will simply not occur . Therefore, the environmental impacts of noise, exhaust and conjestion which could flow from such a situation will also not occur . Conclusion No. 6. The Examiner 's conclusion that the impacts of the proposed parking plan would "permit " negative or adverse impacts into a wide area is simply wrong and misleading. First , as indicated above, the area involved is at most a block and 1/2 in distance from the most southern to the most northern lot . Second , the City has determined through its environmental checklist procedures under the State Environmental Policy Act that the proposed building and its parking plan do not have even the potential for more than a moderate effect upon the environment . This decision is embodied in the so-called "Declaration of Non-Significance" issued in this case. Conclusion No . 7. The applicant can not more strongly disagree and take exception to the conclusion of the Examiner that the proposed parking plan "will detract from the value of adjoining properties and will lead to a continued blighting of a three or four block area". First , there is no evidence in the record to suggest that property values will be other than enhanced by the proposal. Second , as indicated above, the area in question is not three or four blocks but only one and one-half bloks. Third , the parking lots are proposed for either vacant or currently aesthetic eyesore parcels of land (e .g. Gary 's Automotive and the City Water Deparment equipment storage yard) . Conclusion No . 8. The area in question is clearly not a residential neighborhood , as suggested by the Examiner in this conclusion. This fact is borne out by the maps attached as Exhibits and All large office buildings will require as mucE parking space as is involved here and the conclusion that the proposed parking plan would or could be a bad precedent is absurd in light of the realities of the off-street parking requirments which affix to all office buildings except possibly in the downtown CBD. Respectfully submitted this 30th day of July, 1980. CRANE, CARROLL, BOESE, DUNHAM, STAMPER & DAILY Stephen J. Crane Attorney for Eugene Horbach, Applicant and Appellant SJC:cba Attachments # 5235A • OF R�� • m, { o THE CITY OF RENTON ®o 10 z • .• MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 ems, '-:..,. n �, ° BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR PLANNING DEPARTMENT °9A co• 235-2550 0,9gT�D SEP�003 June 4 , 1980 Mr . Eugene Horbach 5th and Park Place Company , Inc . 550 S .W. 7th Renton, Washington 98055 RE : SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICATION SP-050-80 , AUXILIARY PARKING Dear Mr , Horbach : The application for a special permit has been reviewed by the department staff. In accordance with the Parking & Loading Ordinance , there are some design errors in the project . Lot #1 is considered as part of the development site and not considered under the special permit . However , it does not meet Section 4-2204 (8 ) (B) (2 ) of the Parking & Loading Ordinance in providing landscaping adjacent to the public right-of-way . A 5-foot wide landscaping island will have to be provided between the two curb cuts proposed , thus making the total available parking in Lot #1 appear to be 18 spaces . . Out of the other 50 parking spaces provided adjacent to the building , only 48 are useable with some design modifications at the northeast corner of the building . Thus , the total on-site parking is estimated to be 66 spaces . LOT #2 Parking Lot #2 appears not to meet the design criteria for auxiliary parking lots in that it is more than 500 ' from the southern property boundary of the building . The Hearing Examiner will have to determine if it meets the criteria of an auxiliary parking lot . In addition , the accesses on the eastern side of the proposed lot do not appear to connect directly onto a street . If there are access easements across the adjacent parcel to the west then those easements will have to be documented . The 4 spaces adjacent to the eastern property line are not functional . They do not provide enough area for the automobiles to manuever . Therefore , the functional use of the parking lot is cut down to a maximum of 46 parking spaces . The proposed parking lot is immediately south of the Circus-Circus Building , an area used for parking for F.,r.i l i i-, l ion nn 4-ha ct-,1-h c r-1,. of fhP h',.i lrlinn . 9 Letter to Eugene Horbach June 4, 1980 Page -2- Based upon on-site inspections , it would appear that the construction of the parking lot will diminish this area evidently used for parking by Circus-Circus and the actual operation of the building . Plans should be submitted indicating the use of the Circus-Circus building and the parking required for that use to assure the City that the minimum parking required for the building under the Parking & Loading Ordinance is met and that - parking Lot #2 is not removing some of the required parking from that facility . If it is considered to use parking Lot #2 as a joint parking lot, the evaluation of the function of the lot will have to be reconsidered . LOT #3 Parking Lot #3 does not meet the minimum aisle width required for 90° parking under Section 4-2LUO( 1 ) \L\ ,2\ (a) of the Parking & Loading Ordinance . Therefore , the proposed 11 spaces cannot be utilized without obtaining a variance . The Board of Adjustment will not be able to consider the variance until their regular meeting on July 23rd . Applications would have to be submitted by Tuesday , June 24th (at the latest) to the Building Division of the Public Works Department . There are residences on both sides of proposed parking Lot #3 . This would require a minimum 5-foot landscaping " strip along with the standard 20-foot long parking stalls and the 24-foot wide aisle would necessitate a minimum width of 54 feet . The proposed lot is only 45 feet if" in width . Under Section 4-2204(8 ) (B ) ( 1 ) of the Parking & Loading Ordinance , the Planning Department may allow • a minimum 42" high screening fence in lieu of the landscaping /Cl/ /JX upon proper application for good cause shown . In most \ \ cases the Planning Department has only considered the v., use of a combination of fencing along with landscaping . In this case there is not enough space to construct a fence on both sides of the proposed lot . Normally , 3 feet of landscaping and the 42" high fence is utilized ; 1:1 instead of the 5 feet of landscaping . If this was allowed 4\7 by the Planning Department , the lot would have to be \ 50 feet wide . Therefore , the only alternative would be to seek a variance from the aisle width and the stall length . In addition , there is a question as to the required parking for the State of Washington halfway house . • Parking Lot #3 appears to take away the parking that is presently used by the halfway house and there has to be clarification as to whether the parking was required as a condition of approval of the halfway house . ti Letter to Eugene Horbach June 4, 1980 Page -3- ALLEY PARKING On the design plans you ' ve shown an existing alley running between North 5th and North 4th Streets . The parking spaces provided at the northern end of this vacated alley adjacent to North 5th Street are shown accessing onto school property . It will be necessary for you to present documentation that you have access over the school property by either easement or lease from the school district , otherwise those parking spaces cannot be counted . The parallel parking spaces do not meet the dimensional requirement of Section 4-2206( 1 ) (B) of the Parking & Loading Ordinance . Those spaces must be a minimum of 9 x 23 feet . They are shown on the plans at 8 x 22 feet . In addition, all of the uses . on the eastern half of the block along the alley parking will have to be delineated to determine if a landscaping buffer is required according to Section 4-2204(8 ) (b ) (1 ) . LOT #4 Parking Lot #4 has a single family residence located on the south side of the proposed lot . Under Section 4-2204 (8) (6 ) ( 1 ) a minimum 5-foot wide landscaping strip shall be provided adjacent to the residential use . Modification of the design will eliminate 4 of the parking spaces along the alley . LOT #5 Parking Lot #5 appears to comply with the requirements of the Parking & Loading Ordinance . However , the alley which runs between Park Avenue North and Pelly Avenue North south of Gary ' s Automotive and the proposed lot would have to be improved by the applicant to utilize the access onto it . The landscaping shown on the southern boundary of proposed Lot #5 in the central aisle should be moved to the northwest corner of the site to provide more screening . This will not lower the number of parking spaces useable on the site . LOT #6 Parking Lot #6 complies with the requirements of the Parking & Loading Ordinance ; however , the 4 western-most parking stalls do not appear functional from a manuevering point of view . Therefore , the number of stalls would be reduced by 4 to a total number of 50 parking spaces . 6 Letter to Eugene Horbach June 4, 1980 Page -4- In summary, the Fifth and Park Building will require approxi- mately 270 parking spaces based on 54, 000 square feet of useable office space . The entire building is approximately 66 ,000 square feet and 12 , 000 has been eliminated for the 'stairways in the building . Our preliminary review of the proposed special permit suggests that only 260 can be provided on the proposed lot . Seventeen of those spaces are questionable because they are located within an alley . Landscaping plans have not been submitted showing how these projects will be screened from adjacent uses . This is critical in determining the environmental impact of the project and determining whether the special permit should be issued . In addition, we have not received any information on whether the lots have been purchased and which lots are leased . In the case of leases , we must be assured that a sufficient time period (at least 5 years ) is available to provide parking for the structure . Therefore , we need a copy of the leases attached to the application . If you should have any further questions regarding this matter , please do not hesitate to contact this department . Very truly yours , Gordon Y . Ericksen, Planning Director WIte-q Roger J . Blaylock , Associate Planner RJB ;sh 1 \ BEING COMMERCIAL AIRPLANE COMPANY P.O. Box 3707 Seattle, Washington 98124 A Division of The Boeing Company July 29, 1980 R-6301-1028 Mr. Stephen Crane Crane, Carroll , Boise, Dunham, Stamper & Daily 350 Grand Central on the Park Seattle, Washington 98104 RE: Fifth and Park Building Special Permit Dear Mr. Crane: At the Renton Hearing Examiner Public meeting on July 8th, a statement was made by Mr. Robert Yakas, representing Boeing-Renton, in response to the Examiner's question regarding assignment of parking spaces at the Fifth and Park Office Building. Mr. Yakas stated that the most feasible way to handle this parking situation would be to assign spaces, so Boeing Facilities would most likely do this. However, the policy at Boeing is not to assign parking stalls other than for management personnel . In the case of the Fifth and Park Building, approximately forty spaces would be assigned or approximately 14% of the overall requirement. Since Mr. Yakas was under oath in the public hearing, he felt it wa-s necessary to correct his testimony and he subsequently called the Examiner's office to clarify his statement. The statement published in the Hearing Examiner's decision (Page 4, Paragraph 3) should read," . . . assignment of all spaces by the Company would not be possible. " This letter will serve to clarify our position on the parking assign- ment and we are prepared to present this clarification in the next proceed- ings. Should you have further questions on this or related matters, please contact me on 237-0277. Sincerely, R. L. Ranta 707/727/737 Division Facilities Planning Manager /1 ?z W� shall be reduced to One Thousand Thirty Dollars ($1,030.00) per month and will be increased to Twelve Hundred Forty Dollars ($1,240.00) upon delivery of possession of said Tract C, . which shall ,not be later than mid-night December 31, 1979. 2. The Lessee shall have the right at its option • and expense to demolish the residence situated upon Tract C. 3. That Lessee accepts and leases said premises for the term above stated and agrees to pay the rentals provided for in advance to DOBSON BUILDING COMPANY c/o Dobson, Mouser & Dobson, 229 Williams Avenue South, P. 0. Box 59, REnton, Washington 98055 or at such other place,as Lessor may in writing designate. The above payment of Four Thousand Seven Hundred Fifty Dollars ($4,750.00) now made shall in the .event of the full and faithful performance of all of the covenants and agre=„ s in this lease by said Lessee to be performed be credited in payment of the first month's rent and applied upon the last ' three month's rent of said term. 4. In addition to the monthly rentals provided for herein the Lessee shall pay prior to delinquency the real estate taxes levied against the demised premises during the t= of this lease or any extension thereto. In the event that the real estate tax statement covers other properties in addition e w the leased properties, such taxes shall be pro-rated on the bats ; of the property subject to this lease as compared to those not subject to the lease. In addition the Lessee shall pay any loci improvement district assessments becoming due during the term o' • this lease. • -2- . • S. On November lst of each year of the term of this ". lease the base rental of Twelve Hundred Forty Dollars ($1240.00) shall be adjusted in accordance with Cost of. Living increases' based upon the Consumer Price Index for Seattle, Washington, now issued by the Board of Labor & Statistics of United States-, . Department of Labor and referred to as "Price Index Figure" for the month of J#244 , 1979, and for the "month of in the y,ar in which such monthly base rent is adjusted effectiv on November let of that year. The adjustment in monthly rent . .hall be determined as follows; . The price index figure o 1979, the price index figure for of the year of adjustment and the monthly rental of One Thousand Two Hundred Forty Dollars ($1,240.00) . ha .l, be the basis upon which any adjustments' shall be computed. The difference, if ny, between the price index figure r 1979 and the price index figure for of the year of th adjustment shall be .sc-rtained by subtracting the lesser from the greater of such . . figures. Thereafter such differences 11 be divided by the price index figure for 1979 which will provide the percentage of change if any, in the price index figure. If such percentage of change represents an increase, then the monthly rent commencing 'November 1st of the year of the ad j ustment shall for the next twelve (12) consecutive months be Twelve Hundred Forty Dollars ($1240.00) plus the sum derived by multiplying the sum of $1240.00 by such percentage of change. . s"s . f . . 7 , In the ;=event the Consumer Price ,Index issued by the. d. • united States Department of Labor be discontinued, or, if them-- is a substantial change in the method of determining the price index figure from the base month of 1979, any. other appropriate r and suitabl Govrnmental Index shall be used providing it • offers a comparison between a period reasonably close to 1979 • ' and the subsequent month and year being measured. 6. Lessor hereby grants iassee the right and option to extend this , lease for an additional term of five (5) years ..3- { 6 LEASE • THIS LEASE entered into this � day of A � J 1979, by and between DOBSON BUILDING COMPANY, a Washington corporation, (hereinafter called the L=ssor) , and FIFTH & PARK PLACE CO. , a .Washington corporation(hereinafter called the Lessee: WITNESSET H: • 1. That in consideration of th covenants and agree- ments of Lessee her=inafter set forth and of the sum of Four • Thousand Seven Hundred Fifty Dollars ($4,750.00) now paid to the Lessor by the Les:= e, the said Lessor does by thee present' 11 p lease and demise unto the said Lessee those certain px _ iees described as follows: A. Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 8, Anton Farm �� Plat and South 140 feet of the Westerly { 20 feet of Lots 10 thru: 12, Block 20, Sartorisvilie adjoining to the east. _4 E. Lot 8, Block 8, Renton Farm Plat and aterly 20 feet of Block 2 Sartorieville adjoining to the east. C. North 10 feet Lot 8 and all of Lot 9, Block 10 Renton Farm Plat except Street and Alley all in King County, Washington. for a._ period of ten (10) years from November 1, 1979, to Octobo .. 31, 1989, at a monthly base rental of One Thousand Two Hundred' Forty Dollars ($1,240.00) , to be adjusted as hereinafter provid=. payable in advance on the first day of each and ev‘ ry rental , month during the full term of this leas- . Any period of time • 1{ between the execution of this 1 =•ase and November 1, 1979, shall l be paid for by the Lessee upon a pro-rata. per diem basis so that the term of the lease will be ten plus years. During the period of time between the execution of the lease and the delivery of possession of Tract C to the Lessee, th=- r-ntal -1- . . / commencing November 1, 1989, conditioned upon the following: (1) Written notice of Lessee's election to extend shall be given to Lessor not later than six (6) months prior to the expiration of this lease. (2) All the terms and conditions of this lease to be performed by Lessee shall have been performed promptly to the date of such notice. (3) The rental during such extended period shall be a agreed upon betwen the Lessor and Lessee. In the event 1 the parties are unable to agree upon a reasonable rent, it shall be submitted to arbitration. Each party shall select an arbitrator and the,= arbitrators so selected shall select the third arbitrator. The decision of the arbitrators will be binding upon the parties hereto and the costs of the third arbitrator shall be shared equally by the parties. 7. First Right of REfusal. In the event that all terms and condition of this lease sh ,11 have been faithfully and promptly performed by Lessee, Lessee shall have the first right of refusal on any sale negotiated by the Lessor during the term of this lease or any extension thereof. Lessor shalt,, , submit to Lessee all of the terms of such proposed sale and \` ; , Lessee shall have thirty (30) day. in which to meet such terms and purchase the property. If the property is cold prior to the expiration of the original term Lessee's option to renew shall be terminated. If the sale occurs after the exercise of the option for additional term, such additional term may at Lessor's option be terminated upon thirty (30) days notice. Likewise, if Lessee is not in breach or default of this agreemen , (it) (they) shall have the right of first refusal to lease Lots _4- 4, 5, 6 and 7, Block 8 REnton Farm Plat and tic Westerly 20 feet of Block 2 Sartorievilie adjoining to -the. bast when the • present leases thereon termin=te. However, .this right shall not apply to. the present tenants. 8. -That the Lessee accepts said premises in their - present condition and hereby covenants and agrees to keep them in good repair and safe condition. .Any improvements to the realty shall upon the expiration or sooner termination of this lease be and remain the property of the Lessor. 9. UTILITIES. That the said Lessee covenants and agrees to pay all charges for utilities furnished to said M. s premises during the term of this lease. . 10. ACCIDENTS: That th z, said Lessee shall hold harmi=s: the Lessor and Lessor's agents from all damages of every kind and nature whatsoever that may be claimed or accrue by reason of any accident in or about the leased premises, or from the Lessee's use or occupation of the leased premises and areas adjacent. thereto, or caused by the acts or neglect of the Lease' or any agent of the Lessee.. It is agreed that neither the Lessor, nor the Lessor's agents, shall be liable for the death of, or injury to, any person in or about the premises, or loss, of, or damages to, any property of the Lessee, and the Lessor shall not be. liable to the Lessee, or to any person, for cla arising from any defect. in the construction or present conditio* • of they premises, whether known or unknown, or for damages by storms, rain or leakage. Lessee further agrees to carry ade- quate liability insurance in the principal amount of One Millio, Dollars $1,000,000.00) and to name Lessor as an additional. ins ,e thereon. - -5- e 11. CARE OF PREMISES: That the said Lessee shall keep said leased premises clean and in a sanitary condition to the atisfaction of the Board of Health and Fire Department of the city`or county having political jurisdiction, and its inspectors; and shall comply with each and all of the statutes of the State of Washington and ordinances .of the city or county in force or hereafter enacted; and shall keep the sidewalks surrounding the same free and clear of ice, snow and any other obstructions, according to th ordinances of said city or count . 12. BUSINESS PURPOSE: That the said Lessee shall not use said premises or any part thereof for illegal purposes. 13. LIENS & INSOLVENCY: It is hereby agreed that if the Lessee becomes either insolvent or bankrupt, or if a receiver is appointed, that the Lessor may cancel this lease at said Lessor's option. 14. ASSIGNMENT: That said Lessee shall not let or sub-let the whole or any part of the leased premises nor assign this :lease or any part thereof without the written consent og the Lessor nor shall this lease be assignable by.operation of law. 15. GOVERNMENTAL FEES: It is expr rely understood and agreed that the ss=id Lessee shall during the term of this lease pay all fees due the City, County or State, on account of any inspection made on said leased premises by any officer of said City, County or State. 16. USABILITY: The Lessee has independently determine. the usability of the premises for the purpose for which it iss hereby leased and 1 ,esor makes no representation as to the lg= lity of the Lessee's use of the premises. 17. CONDEMNATION: In the event of the taking of the demised premises herein by condemnation or otherwise by any � I governmental authority, this lease shall be deemed terminated as of the time of taking possession by said authority, and, if Lessee is not in default under any provisions of this lease on said date, the lease consideration herein receipted for, if any, shall be refunded to the Lessee, as well as rental paid for any period beyond the date of cancellation. Lessee shall have no claim to nor shall it be entitled to any portion of any award for damages to the land. 18. FIRS 6 SUccESSoRs: All th- provisions of this 1 ,ase shall be binding upon the respective heir;,, executors, administrators, successors and assigns pf Iesssssor and Leaseee, 18. DEFAULT AND REENTRY: That if the said lessee shall fail to keep and prform any of the covenants and agreemsn: herein contained, then the said Lessor may cancel this lease upon giving th:: notice required by law and re-enter said premise: . but notwithstanding such re-entry by the Lessor the liability of the lessee for the rent provided for herein shall not be extinguished for the balance of the term of this lease and the Lessee cov:nants and agrees to make good to the Lessor any deficiency arising from a re-entry and re-letting of the premises at a lesser rental than herein agreed to. The Lessee shall pay such deficiency each month as the amount hereof is ascertained by the Lessor. If for any reason it becomes necessary for either party to bring suit to enforce the terms of this lease then the losing party shall pay a reasonable attorney's fee and all costs and expenses expended or incurred by the prevailing party in connection with such action. _7.. 20. REMOVAL OF PROPERTY: In the event of any entry in,, or taking possession of, the demised premises as aforesaid, the Lessor shall have the right but not the obligation, to remove from the demised premises all personal property located therein and may place the same in storage at a public warehouse at the expense and risk of the owners thereof. 21. NON-WAIVER OF BREACH: No waiver by Lessor of a breach by Lessee of any covenants, agreements, stipulation or condition of this lease shall be construed as a waiver of any 1 succeeding breach of the same covenant, ,agreement, stipulation or condition of this lease. 22. NOTICES : Any notice to be given to the Lessor shall be given to: DOBSON BUILDING COMPANY c/o Dobson, Houser & Dobson P. O. box 59 Renton, Washington 98055 TO LESSEE : FIFTH & PARK PLACE CO. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set their hands and seals the day and year above written. LESSOR: LESSEE: DOBSON BUILDING COMPANY FIFTH & PARR PLACE C . BY: �► -v�a BY BY/ res dent BY: BY: c,t iQ. Y ecreta S r Lary f STATE OF WASHINGTON ) : SS. COUNTY OF RING ) • On . this ( ? day of - , 1979, before ins, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn personally appeared JOHN W. DOBSON and DAVID C. DOBSON, to me known to be the President and Secretary respectively, of the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the use and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath atated that they are • authorized to execute the said instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year in this certificate above written. ) 43 Nor Public in and for Y o t 8 ate of Washington residing at GUARANTEE WE, EUGENE }IORBACH and JOYCE S. HORBACR, husband and wife, do each hereby guarantee individually and as a marital community the full and complete performance of all the terms and conditions required of the corporate Lessee named in the above and foregoing Lease. DATED this day of October, 1979. .771467-4-4 42):1 919 r C4I81 d -9- , " I r I , ADDENDUM TO LEASE DATED NOVEMBER 1, 1979 i WHEREAS, under date of November 1, 1979 DOBSON BUILDING COMPANY, a Washington corporation, entered into a lease with FIFTH & PARK PLACE CO. , a Washington corporation, for certain properties in Block 8, Renton Farm Plat and Block 2, Sartoris- ville Addition to Renton, now therefore in 'consideration of the additional sum of Three Hundred Seventy-Five Dollars ($375) per month, commencing May 1, 1980 , the Lessors add to the property covered by said lease the remaining portion of the Westerly 20 feet of Block 2, Sartorisville, Renton, Washington . The rental under the principal lease is then increased to ISixteen Hundred Fifteen Dollars ($1,615 . 00) commencing on said May 1, and all other terms and conditions of said lease shall remain in full force and effect. i ' DATED this 23rd day of April, 1980. LESSOR: LESSEE: I DOB ON BUILDING COMPANY FIFTH & PA PLACE CO. 11 BY. J rm BY c=-'',� resident President BY:j%tei_e_W),C5-11-4,,,,__ BY: ��;i_ 4'� 1da�c,�✓ Secretary t e /etary GUARANTEE WE, EUGENE HORBACH and JOYCE S. HORBACH, husband and wife, I do each hereby guarantee individually and as a marital community the full and complete performance of all the terms and conditions required of the corporate Lessee named in the above and foregoing Addendum to Lease. 7/4ATED is 23rd day of May, 1980. 1 1/ ii L: 1 l • AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING State of Washington) County of King ) Marilyn J. Petersen , being first duly sworn, upon oath disposes and states: That on the 16th day of July , 1980 , affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below-entitled application or petition. • Subscribed and sworn this 10- day of :cAy 19 4,o . OJLL Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing 4 Renton Application, Petition or Case: Fifth & Park Place Co. ; SP-050-80 (The minuteb contain a £A.6t off the pa/ales os necond) • -7ff if ) ~rr 0- MEMORANDUM TO : Rick Beler, Hearing Examiner March 12 ; 1978 FROM: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Re: CHG International Rezone Application Dear Rick: In response to your Memorandum to me concerning the above captioned topic, I have the following comments: 1. The Hearing Examiner can consider only those items presented to him and not other parcels of land not subject to the hearing. It is my understanding of the law that no jurisdiction over other property would be involved. 2 . Spot zoning is a recognized legal theory when property is being changed in zoning, but not when it is being allowed to remain the same . 3. If there is a problem with property not being rezoned or property around it is being rezoned, and it is apparent that this property should be rezoned, then this topic should be referred to the Planning Department for action on behalf of the City. 4 . Ilnow of no case law on this particular subject matter in the State of Washington, but believe our Ordinance system would require that any rezone application be generated by the City and thereafter considered by the hearing Examiner. However, the Hearing Examiner could impose restrictions on the rezone application to make , sure -that the impact on particular properties would not be excessive . If I can be of any further assistance to you, please feel free to contact me. Lawrence J. Arren , LJW:nd , cc: Mayor Council President Del Mead , --.0 P- 199- 2S/ • • NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING • RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER •" RENTON,WASHINGTON Affidavit of Publication A public hearingwi be held by the Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the STATE OF WASHINGTON council chambers,City Hall, COUNTY OF KING ss Renton, Washington, on February 21, 1978, at 9:00 A.M. to consider the follow- ing petitions: Margaret Harbaugh 1. C.H.G. INTERNA- being first duly sworn on TIONAL, APPLICA- • TION FOR RE- - S-1 oath,deposes and says that She is the Chief Clerk TONE ,FROM1 R-3 . of TO R-3,R-1 TOR-3, THE RENTON RECORD-CHRONICLE, a newspaper published four(4) AND S-1 129-7 , times a week.That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and File N R-129-78 has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred prope e ;on to, printed and published in the English language continually as a news- Hardie Avenue S.E. paper published four(4)times a week in Kent,King County,Washington, between Sunset and it is now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained Boulevard West and at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper.That the Renton • the Burlington Record-Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the —Northern Railroad Superior Court of the County in which it is published,to-wit,King County, Right-of-way. 2. PAUL AND ANNE Washington.That the annexed is a Notice of Public SMITH,APPLICATION FOR FOUR-LOT, Hearing • SHORT PLAT AP- PROVAL AND WAIV- ER OF OFF-SITE IM- • PROVEMENTS, Files as it was published in regular issues(and No.130-78 and W-131- not in supplement form of said newspaper) once each issue for a period 78;property located on of 1 consecutive issues,commencing on the the southeast corner of Jones Avenue N.E.tnd - ' N.E.20th in the vicinity day of Feb�u 8 ary ,19...� ..,and ending the of 1916 Jones Avenue N.E. Legal descriptions of files noted above on file in the day of ,19 both dates Renton Planning Depart- inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its sub- ment. scribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee All interested persons to said petitions are invited to 7 be present at the public charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of $..2•t...?-which ' hearing on February 21, has been paid in full at the rate of per folio of one hundred words for the 1978, at 9:00 A.M. to.ex- first insertion and per folio of one hundred words for each subsequent press their opinions.insertion. i- •GORDON Y. ERICKSEN • J/ • RENTON PLANNING /.�/. -. ./zi/ ��:,� "c..L DIRECTOR / Published in The Renton Record Chronicle February Chief Clerk •10,.1978..R4792 " Subscribed and sworn to before me this 10 day of February , 1978 e.. .j a.- 7, :::- 3,Notary Publs.'n and'for the State of Washingto , /"residing at Kent, King Co t J/� ..,'' J/—Passed by the Legislature,1955,known as Senate Bill 281,effective June 9th, 1955. —Western Union Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures, <cr=adopted by the newspapers of the State. • I NT EROFFI C .E .C,'QRRE'.SP';0NDENCE ' - pate March 16, 1978 • • . , y To: , Marilyn Petersen,, Land Use hearing Examiner Dept. FROM: Richard C. Houghton, Engineering Supervisor SUBJECT: CHG International Rezone R129-78 - • We have checked the legal description contained with the attached paperwork . ' 'relative to the above referenced rezone and find it :-to be satisfactory except' for a minor exclusion within Parcel "B". The last paragraph on page one, pertaining to Block 8 within the Plat of ' '., Earlington should be corrected to read as follows : ' Also that portion of Lots 9 and 10 together witli one-half of the . vacated alley' adjacent, lying south of the south line of Primary . State Highway No, 2;' and 'lots 11, 12 and 13 together with one-half of the vacated alley adjacent, all in Block 8. • ,' Ali:pmp ' .. . ... '-14,-lis , 4.....ge4-1- . LAJAS Ci-i-V-c.4.FD Im . . 1141Ag Agt N474ge. 14GOOPOR1474!) -, . , HC,-;.':::::-.:-....-' • .- ,, - C,..4 .12126ColION tA)A-c. MA-Dg A-T "MAT . . ;: •:',.-,',.:::, . ,bESPTTO . ../. . , , , ' 1/1 . .'/ b' . ,,, • . . a.,644,4, ..,-.: , , r.,,_. 10- -L - p,, . . . . . , , • • , , • • . Affidavit of Publication STATE OF WASHINGTON . ' „ COUNTY OF KING SS. F' yr ;<� :' •w:•;; i .R''" :?1 to; ..(pil ,n `,:.' " • „•`.reit)ned�to`.&USIMESS,,D1 • *� ; " TRICT:'(13.1)� RESIDENCE • . • . ,+lSIt131 fJN},:>x.'r;' •• T 3 aiid'RES1=1 prf ANC:E'I4C 12 d 'q} DISTfaIC. (R� )'.. •- NCE: DENCE''D1.STRtt«' R2�, ' A2122..y... k�Ia1by beingfirstdulyswornori • 4..`. �" ;. he•reinbelow,specifi :sub- • s ,..tit ,OF�AENf 0,0.:,: >: 1,3. ,,A,*��iy`I N,.p`'T O N";.r..iect;'to.the_hndirigs;;>,,w, C uq '' oath deposes and says thatilhe...is theChiaf'••Clerk N�31NG;'fEdE ;?oN > ,stops and dec4.0.- ,,,itv �: P of i f1li March,4, t-97Q4 thatC gJ{ THE RENTON RECORD CHRONICLE, a newspaper published four(4) cE)�Cj'AtM;P,:ROPER-,4;,•c,i,itiearing Examiner 1e P, ._;-;. • times a week.That said,newspaper is a legal riews� a er and it is now and ,' "'' ;ntn Director?ie„hereby!au, g P P ,. ,r l#aW17)'I N'It(e::CITY:%,.,,, 9;; i p , has been for more than six months prior to"the date ofpublication referred ``" thorized::iirtdr«dijettd#dL- �' �i ,,..f NXON`:FAO,M.::`t,.,r,, a o,."Of;' ,+ to, printed and published in the English language continually as a news- N�R�1t.:,,CkA5S11=h:;•{;,;�.�$Tl �. f, �i; published four(4)times a week in Kent;KingCouni Washington, ca '''' ; , 8 n-e paper y, , 00 N,DISTRICT(GS,,...,-amnin + O,ril ii .d..:i.. ,, and it is now and during all of said time was-printed in an office maintained ,, �= amended;to avid a`5 , i at.the aforesaid place of publication of•said newspaper:That the Renton .b^C Y p S- '"%4'.ii rezoning,,to-wit:.1:9 ) Record-Chronicle has been approved as a legal news a er.by order of the ; -'-. <; � Superior Court of the Countypn which it is to wit KingCounty, -L::;,. *°tf= S.UnBi 7RBAT. r.'; *e.to a dtmade"“i4i ttif. P published, � _' Oi1t��NCE'DIST,RiCT3:`:;�:�;1�ereta;®rid:;m .,a>p�ilt;,,�;.� 1'!L�� :; .hereof asifrfirl get' .^�r Washington.That the annexed is a� •C�a.nanoe 3� 3 ►� t{itC1`".131 `RESI . {:!,•h'et'ein:;-'.',';'` ,qti t '''k'-'` g yy,. IS I (S$id<"prbpertjy;s?;, D; ,,-„ Y,?west;'of°Hardie Avr :';: S. .,'(EdWtlydit.lI rt T, ` `e:as 'P .�aiSiS)kS;under: p{; E:, t1E''s,.," f tom. Streef,'.=l etwe® P"- • m17t18111(RiiNdingRBg `;.;, xy' t. as it was published in regular issues(and : n d)nance,%No';, ,•':Sunset•`.-Boil.,ev -,,,,and.. not In supplement form of said newspaper)once each issue fora Period s s as I Code of, the,;Burlington;:N ._ PPP 4krrowrt, � ` �.� s : `Railroad.right;0(W8Y.,x + of 8rdingt> s bltie�r:: ::.:, ;�, ; t ,)ti� f fienton"s ,ii,aSECTiON: ,,,;;� Asa 1 aitd,:tkjri niaps`.and`.re "„;dance shallzbe effe tine up-. of consecutiveissues;comtnencingbnthe' tediri;donuhc4ioh�°`Foitspassege,epprovlbli$4 ; Ktioli wilh,, he ' ) rt.. `r:five,(5)>da aft®r it, J, F4ewtt .};4-j E?rP Yi .,- >r .ju:N., tl«x.A day of ,19 ;and endingthe ",describe,.has tioti.,:,?:, '•,4. "e », ore been z as'. BASS D'ti:i'Yi.3C ;:',. ,' ' ' fi D COUNCI thle;x4t Q t° ,Ct86sificadon, ,:,. : ; . 4rt Jul' ,19,78i+,''. i�;:-c tr., , ./§ r -es•4Ce,.:.-:� y, fir:N'• t �l, lK�• At. i, f, X a•,�ei `"i•: i 2 i day of U1y. 19. .$..;both dates •-, t ,ils,' of 17.o0,v,.. ,.,; a 'x,,,3' clly, y ;i p art'Reside ce'•.:;F `i.'';,,` '$5q.>•.,:,:. t,!S. inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its sub- ' < Dtr� x..-. •ApppOUEE1; Bi! t;� scribers during all of said period. That the full amount;of'the fee ( '° .0. t• MAYOoes, `;,24tM la i.. d, ;. z Ju 1978'�L � � k5,4,441 t cha a of zone lY ar is ' charged.for the foregoing publication is the sum of d•4' 'which )1:.-,:1catloniof Said propel }v � t� ,YCharles� s ttt 'bag been paid in full at the rate of per folio of one hundred words for the tt nfifed„with the.;; " „. k .. .. � r • pf, rc ed gas to e first insertion andper folio of one hundred words for each subse uent rrient':an;,or;,Y_,.?14:40.K,,,.,:•,." .• insertion. 9 l.�Ay `` eJr!y.. .-�;° k �!".'"""'"'{�{��k�'"" ""'��•d. '�`�' �'���:ISW�®nQ�:.�y+i'dZ::�;�'"�+�,.�Wi'.���., .i+ati e„iiu C Aiftirriay ��; .° ur-_ t(tigh`W� lysre-�;Lr::,:�+ <F �' `�� S ;?---7'.Le. --:2";‘. . . : ' Vr`" ! Record=C ftr , { s 19 8i R5071 i i i y.� 8�d.'-.`,''�„bli !:�°i®dri,�grn:� ;:• •.,�y�yw;. �`5 � 4;, S� '. Chief Clerk riiikc public tteen ng ,>J: f`._ f .. • trig vi .,..,::.•..:.�,` .�^�.�,„_�f �, held thereon,on or • l,n S 1'.'� to t`''Febru 8 :1978�:' Subscribed and sworn to before me this 28` day of .' t$Vl!i9>,beee%a ;` id°tom` r duiy coinsidered t�i��•:ttip Hear7,;-,, • • I .Sitar!iner,and said:zon July , 1978 riequest'.being i for ` in:c9ri • J yyitF►`" a a✓ 's,FCorr C: ��.c e� s -t1sli.14,.0 an;rcas,amend=: •cy`'yttie iC CouriCit"<. Notary P is ' and for the State of Wash gton, ' �i Y'' "all , residing at Kent, King County.• TOO:sr ,a ,.. UIy'evant t ' ' ef#et ea;:reiat►t.,'.thereto;:',' ''ali':{ii ttiea'fhaving been :: �Y `+pPo.�positOn —Passed by the Legislature,1955,known as Senate Bill 281,effective June , ,., EFORE'; � �T01IfTWEit., 9th, 1955. `�t.:" +-�QS.'- v ,,'fHt1H CtTY0t1NGiL,OF:> • —Western Union Telegraph Co. rules for countingwords and figures, • . ' , .' :.fR .. r. • adopted by the newsaers of the State. g �l HIN ON,.00y ORj ;r,• '+'iii6ri_-, .. in the:' . • ,�y.�` - . of "on. eby=» . v.. ,Ail -OF RA, / • , Ikit-1. 0 /1/ ?> Iry 0 ' 444; .• 0 • THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 l, IMMO Z CHARLES J. DELAURENTI) MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 0 235-2550 90 Q3- .42. , '6-0 SEF31 -. . , MEMORANDUM , . . _ September 12 , 1978 , . ' TO : Del Mead , City Clerk FROM : Michael L. Smith , Senior Planner , RE : File No . R-165-78, STANLEY STONE REZONE • File No. R-166-78 , MARVIN WEHRMAN REZONE File No . R- 167-78, ARTHUR D. SWANSON REZONE • Attached are the fully signed deeds for right-of-way required as part of the above, mentioned Stone and Swanson H. rezone approvals . These are ready- for recording and fur- ther processing by the Council Ways and Means Committee . A similar deed for the Wehrma'n rezone has not yet been completed . As soon as all the signatures, are attained , we will forward that deed to you also. ' . • MLS : wr . • Attachments . , • , . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . rY :(/ >: . ` :.:,.{ : : Y( • ' s. + '� `�Rxn-!LS T . ti'/ t :, },vy"nr i,: . e " ` : ` ' • • s A=••am- { K{% ,; i+� .1 ,�:r.. },o; ' : � ` Y¢Y.'192q>:.' S9 -;..d.- � '(; --lf', - ' i'• •ix ) " :b .b '( _„v'*.3'ti"5�T,7 : . � � �Y;i; yrhf"�. '� ;; rv' ia:' 1:t,` �' � ., •Jr:j, ¢,r: ` :"i` te • :, �. "x ' 1/ .{.., .S pr " :F;'�•,.:a,t4 ;;;": f :p:f'Lra�� ,,:> ,d � �f-r "•de. , . o l . .f '6id+n,�o+..,�rf:>"4:� T . ,, 'Y. l . ,Ya':,!'�'',, r r ,• y .xir' • _ . ° x .• ) {�: i"r'�: :�: ;ai .?' rYJ• .'� iW,w, .1a ,.^ F }rkk- e�y`rr '4„ 'r�' '- ' � , ' 'kT" H+ ' a"J�r7.: `."''e. r,�w4� L,°''c :�.i'yt s%`, 4�.R<z.`f�l.ir<" t�':^, `L _ - ,nz�C 2 .�3H • 7-� . . ,' ' fi.5i c'a� , I "fi.{, ^ r"•n �'''''AL',,? F • { .N's°i • • k � . 1.- p , 'Sr.,. „n 1:.', - - ,+ . ti Sx. rrl .:,_ .. . � ��:. 1 ; • • ';:' tAUNiC1PAlBUtLDIN� ZOQMILa"Al �°§O:'REN TON,:WASH , 98055�� >L '' � (• ' i. . � ; ' 'i "�. ▪ - '..4�'F••; - ,r.,;.r:? „ ^�, y )3 y,rsa, : 7{ •c'Ay ? - � 1AUR T� A ( R ' PANNING'.DEPA �zbVT• ' ' _.^';':CNA ES: t7ELE ' MIOf.r. ,., Rc ..• • V ? 4� - ": Y . � ; J•1`: "� £�'N•-,• 1,J' - • •t'6 1J.,::4;`,.! - :'}s'r i:'.:•,:'. -nh,:f'•'r:$ l,.x e ./'..> . f F.0 =� Y,p E _ • •^N`4 • a 13. t.�:N`'', _'•4,.�.:.Sp .Y _ JJ S. i`, .�j? t •_!,:r.� ;:rA '.,.t•'r'Yf^?.. 1{��, . Yr�. „f" ^:ry' T't - , + s Yd'„- b. '5;;:S ,F,A ;h.. h-';.'iii:j„,,,7,f, x ± , . i4' _ ^i , ' i • t ',1 {{ rY 74 f i 'r• r';�a � 4,k. .R - t+, -%i a • .sa '" x`�7 • ., •• • - $:,,• ,t -¢,t:: • f' i- ., :▪ - ;41^ ,,:, , rAY, '•L?p j Cil: i, 1}. Y l.� R, >; , "ri';•, _"'Yf;^y': nM1`' p ',1• .t,, r'�, uF' .,!i.r�, 'ctr i.r• '• - Yt4�' 'q ��ays erlrs .a; ` e.Wi•:. , '- ,, ';- �r. .-t,k },`:.,•� v^tts.::a i ,;.yr`''':":;::r,' "ax:Wr.'•y-it':'..t.,}1'...:::ef'tn.'n i i':. ,.i;r' „ , �e;fi'; • r�'f.Nr 4+`�..r. If,Y,J„ ,1,5':'..;1.h:•'e.t.3,u�t'+.,hyO-�: li`•;,- ,•Y"r•. "i." • - . `! ;j?r;' - •i .is;? ,.'ti.Ci!e',,V . ,;'4,•,:-jl'•;r• '✓,,i?;:.4'▪ '<i^r. -4''�vr'i x:'. .• ;, ",a` {... ?-Y2i- ,,t"r1. - "s''4a,.,'i'4, r.t,.,%.Y. k,i�s.• ' `x;:�tr J+1" r ;Cl' ;'g'' s.p.A..«w " ' rll,u,.,.u.n r9rc.; .i^•'. I. • -a!,'_(,}."•r!'-),:`-"� : - ..' a ' f r1 Y>;•-',-:� """?'. f,-x, . „Iry a .:.,a": % ':fl, ,%"- � �"it)'' 'f j 5 %..,i. •' t .5z o",q:✓'vs:+ . n: � i ,.,�. q(`'4ri;�; • 1.� .6: - • - •7y =" (• Sl i�t �"%, •: .' ' ; " : • ' ▪ sr. . +, . .•^-'; ,�.'• • •• `S; rt ',af1rVm�.;-:.p.,;: '•r:,, `rFa.F-..a>Ky,,.`IdX f-:1;.5 - '• /c1rT'";„sni'•�C :J;1r. 1 _ • ,f l+,.a YET .tY'"...,F,N - Ph ., _ ,d br• • 1''1, 'c'S,, y> • Jr rt _ � �s „ . , • 2' -<r" a_<`5. • '•:-' ,eyr ▪ .L-,r,.'r.a , },. , , :5n'5.,, . ..y^,.,,))�, s, v,Via. r=a `Y yi ,, r ,y;aa :✓; <�°' ,• iop.y ' ,:,� h artrP'„}„ i : t�;, -��',d i,,;�.. - - � £ir uiT}4.". . � .,, 'rryi,s g-:)•.'�'g'k3 a:4i�,,6�., :i ;s�` 51'. F-. r , - ; }i , 4 !ti�+)'r� u : , ,em "; ._ � • '• ' .: 'PYann:' e r • Ig ` ' ' $ `;'+ . ° • .' _ • • ',' •t'' .. - .v_;"f��i_ i ;., q'•ai,n4C .pn i; L• Ke ^' 4''tt< ' ,^'ra1;' r, ` RE � TO � ��tAPSQ� t R�tA : °'':..zkl:. . . N ., : : . � - ,, F" o(- • • .., • t`.'.ii^:t�,.,•. t :4;'.Ut.• Iv' 'I r1+.. �.,... `,J' _ b.5-'s:..;! 1i,•i ,k''.W'�u.., rv�,%F`��„�,�.,,.',�▪;::.�.�rva _ r�, • ,,y 1. • v;h" ,`k S,r • .,,. r';'' ,,�'.: '-a"�e:d" •.=the.. � - P u r s ua nt:='��:t�o.=�;-.> '�rF`:.'�r;�`:��'`u e`s;t': ,�;:�•:hi=�v°eat wr.. v�_ w .L;�:,t.: , �.�,�_ � .;;fir., .e:;,,w�'-_ :';�', .�° - - �-�� d'e' �r•`�'s^' ;o`€;4's�'���,r' �s::a, :7,t"��'t;� 'o,n`.5��;.:an. - „"''�i.l „',dYrip° • i`,>:.;:ta,=;^i,`"" "rR',ata1 Ry;k - `'t,' '•''.'•,.. •• f.rr* d'e � a='i• ��` �,'s''fi:�ou�l�d,rt a -1,r riote•''=t•h�e ��f�i:�•,;lr •:w�:i=��i•� :c:o.rr. �' - 11- ! -tv tt .a1; .I',,..:rF�'` .t=.a,�,•' ,ya:;:e•;^.u.:',:rir!' Jf'�!;. : i' , 'x '?t:p, .°h"` • ;:fir' t ,�a5r, ' ' . '• ,1,,.. ✓iLk.,..::,,,, :i,�y;;•,r,1v; '. ..,i«',Yr.c.s,„1FY^" lY 3.,„„j5:i.,vf f; ,^X.I�'a n d,4.`:„f' .1'• Vf '1 ''i .";}x, $'' �c'J:f,. • f ` i : .,.. '>rir •,.1.t`, 4 Fr 3',v r • t� � • • • "x ' iy> r ''� l � ft7 :'•x; , I.'-, r •• • �r,�^: '3 x�". ;?y >Fs i:v ;;ukk.:: ':,S•3'' �':, a•i_ a'rtty .In� .ts . r'Lr;.: :, yi j,44 • _ r-17 t;; • • - n1'e'k": - ,,+''.` ,'4•'Sb:; ,.,.,a,r,�'i�r'".,!- ;.�u-.%+'. -•'^r''r +5;, .. .- i�: \t Atta'c m �.. .{, .. ,�t:=t'�:, .,..�,,,,'`, ,f,, ,, I�,;n`.;�,. ,,;:„'.;'>Y�<•'- .. i:k ti}!y';,,,fi., "1:;•v-,-,i....,,.iY,tM�64?,'y ( *`- •Fy,(` •,h :,,.:t. r, 'L•'` .• ;k s • ,Y's Rz., p" :tia:•°f'i.lr�„- )5".>{i''v}, :FYa" u`:�, • "3r. r":'Yi"'.' :'�A,n,�i.txpri" �.�, `^.L'.} b A.. :,irt'- >t+f _, r s,. t,• '''>9'�NSL ,r k�.-:L, 1 n,t... ,y!,','�' ' .•;�• .�: r�W:., .mow.. „�::,.� - `r,. •d 'I"e x r'� ' e , ot. t^,S>,: 'e:���'1:e•�'aL,�, '.d'e�s°; r'��: =t�a�on��;•s;ti'oui � uAd ,' t. ;'f� r -�' the_ riar't'herl • 3' . ;,fee.t .;off` said -r.o: er o, f"Y •rof, s.: °',ta' b• 'a:;"ded'i'ca:ted.:'.;to'F'''th'e':r i h t'=o a` u .es a,�, t,._ *'f� • "'t`Lt�1.• '.,.i'•'i4': .`S?`,rr▪-,.. ti. :.}`.▪+srp Cr.�:'' '::'rtL-)" �''1•�•chG;-..I�,;�p• }.1-''• r ._4r''t r," ,t�i.' - • y(:..• ''`6' �'�• rk .f'i • ,lr: ▪ ,,x,a +,'r:{, ,J';1' - .i,. 5'' ,''',,,,,,I, •i' , [ F". . ry s [ x �, .,: +j r.:;� ,ry;,�"ix� -' h^ �:"r n„ ,�+.1vf{t,,,. lii u: • .rr' '•tr+;•' ,j"•t'i+, �:c} ::�;;r::�)��,q?gip,-ti�rra !`?::'f',.i t;,,,. •,.I :::: .. - • '! at:2:, `;:' ,-y. •ft.rt•..rtc J.,d. .f.}} ',fi, _ ,:: .r. { • -• • _.il:>';:...°L • i;: �.+ilr'",x r92`4`•� ,'1t' +:4 :.tl:r� ,`! - '1.:.•.1�1,,, ;;d.;,, �;4..r.: „xv"'v}`'p%,,`.=,'_(a;;x, '''.:a'<';f�: k::''6'-.".;.';" , :t, F. �.i,'•,{T 1Vr, t�,,:�i.,,'r ,'\`•F3, , S:y,w ^ti .h„t, fir`;} ''�'v�l. "}„:{._rt a;"�'•.,- kit.•:-E;. iJr • • �''T,° - 4't ...d;„•„�;,jsYM- ;;Fs" f`{, rra:,.;ri,n ,t.t,.• - i r/ ,,.Y,,•'.s .,.,;,-...a'y' „,.'-t,,,, ..;i^„r_.},.j,;..f,, Sgi' 'Mi::%,,,...,,,{'i} '.'.. ..Cv S :N. - _ij't;"' - +:i.'•t,•.4r`:Y_. '.... - `/zi%,:1y ',r:,�f.;:.1,,x,'?,'.,- ,7:, - ,,' ;fit, .y,.,y:i;x,,, �.p::,a "w =rr5%• tr'i}, :.l'.. _^}..v.{• - •1:{'l.fir- G.. , _ ♦ • d:ci1'rFS r::"'•',''"':.�•it',,,:�` Ii'.'tiv %:,c • r 1Z • sr L ' . .. - .• . . „'o/, ,-iSf'; m•r ,)' _ _ 'i.\'ttv). ,�`�'';,t:'v'..:LS:; "�1, , i,,�u,,,�Iy T. •,t', ., ✓' i S.:r1,1,Y,,:!�F�a ., ':'t"t.r�.,.s - {t,�L97, 't:.,7`'' "r•�'� ,.,t:.'v `.a +. �;i,:,.r - ' r:F,,,•'4,, ,7j.t,, ;i'', c:�'s ::{:•4-• •';,, j;:ie. ,.fS'r', + , • •► ;THF, CITY ' OF RENT.ON `� "�Y U`~MNICIPAL BUILDING• 200 MILL AVE, SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 ' . .`5 CHARLES J: DELAURENTI, MAYOR ' �; DELORES A. MEAD �A' 4 CITY CLERK ATf4SEPE ,,..;.., August 4 , 1978 • International #1 Washington Plaza , Tacoma-, Washington ,ATTENTION:' Mr:`;;peaul:.Berger • RE Decla' ion of. -Res i cti:'ve' .Covenants • , . Re " e.,' R129-.78: Dear;Mr: Berger,: 'We:forward 'herewith. one copy of ,Res`trict'ive Covenants recorded wi,th`:1<ng .County 'Records arid. Elections on July'2'1, ' 1978: Thank you for your prepayment of tlie $7.00 recording • fees. Yours very 'truly, • CITY OF .RENTON Delores A. Mead, C.M. C. • City Clerk . DM: j,eb • Enclosure .. i • • OF • .► o THE CITY OF RENTON V i® 1:31MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON.WASH. 98055 o �} CHARLES J. DELAURENTI MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER Ap ' L. RICK BEELER . 235-2593 ED SEplt• July 31, 1978 Mr. Paul S. Berger Vice President, C.H.G. International One Washington Plaza Tacoma, Washington 98042 RE: File No. R-129-78;. C.H.G. International Request for Rezone. Dear Mr. Berger: This is to notify you that the above referenced request was approved at the meeting of the Renton City Council of July 24, 1978, by adoption of Ordinance No. 3233. S incere�y;� L. Rick Beeler Hearing Examiner cc: Planning Department City Clerk -..:----/: • _ 7fRATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS QG C3 WHEREAS, the Milwaukee Land Company is the owner of the following real property in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington; and C.H.G. r1 International, a firm incorporated in the State of Washington, has contracted to ti purchase the following real property in 'the City of Renton, County of King, State 0 `'"; of Washington, described as follows: o Parcel A: 0 N` That portion of Government Lots 13 and 14 in Section 18, Township 23 op North, Range 5 East, W.M., in King County, Washington; AND of Tract N 3, Supplemental Map of Renton Shore Lands on file in the office of the `a Commissioner of Public Lands at Olympia, Washington, AND of vacated O Maple Street (formerly Rainier Boulevard) as shown on the Plat of G Earlington, as per plat recorded in Volume 14 of Plats on page 7, records of King County, Washington, described as follows: 07 r- v Beginning at the intersection of the East margin of said Maple Street, as now established, with the North boundary of the Pacific Coast Railroad Company's right-of-way; -a thence North 17°19'44" East along said East margin 231.10 feet to the true point of beginning; thence North 77'18'45" East 820.14 feet to the East line of said. Tract 3; thence Southeasterly along said east line 293.54 feet to the North • boundary of said railway right-of-way; • thence Westerly along said right-of-way line 917.22 feet to the production Southerly of the Easterly line of Lot 1 in Block 16, in • said Plat of•Earlington; thence North 24.14'48" West along said production and along said East line and along the Northerly production of said East line 153.26 feet to said East line of Maple Street, as now established; thence North 17"19'44" East 90.31 feet to the true.point of beginning; ALSO that portion of said Government Lot 14 AND of said Tract 3, I lying Northerly of the above-described parcel, lying Easterly of said East margin of Maple Street and lying Southerly of a line extending due East from the Southeast corner of Lot 28 in Block 10, said Plat of Earlington; NOTE: The bearings hereon refer to the meridian of the Lambert Plane Projection for the.State of Washington, North Zone and are equated 1'26'15" clockwise to the bearings used in the'description of the property conveyed to Robert L. Edwards by deed recorded under Auditor's File No. 5726111. Parcel B: ' The following lots in Earlington, as per plat recorded in Volume 14 of Plats on page 7, records of King County, Washington: That portion of Lots 22, 23, 24, 26, 27 and 28 lying South of the South line of Primary State Highway No. 2 as conveyed to the State of Washington by deeds recorded under Auditor's File No's. 2538823, 2537568 and 2534519; ALL in Block 7; AL£O that portion of Lots 9 and 10 together with one-half of the vacated alley adjacent, lying south of the south line of Primary State Highway No. 2; and Lots 11, 12 and 13 together with one-half of the vacated alley adjacent, all in Block 8. ALSO that portion of Lots 3, 4 and 5 described as follows: Beginning at a point on the Southerly line of said Block 9, 158.00 feet Northeasterly of the Southwest corner of Lot 7 in said Block 9; _ thence at right angles to said Southerly line 88.36 feet more-or-less to the Northerly line of said Block 9; thence Northeasterly along said Northerly line of said Block 9, 66.00 feet more or less to a point 92.00 feet Southwesterly of the North- • easterly corner of Lot 2 in said Block 9; 1110 thence Southeasterly 88.36 feet to a point on the Southerly line • of said Block 9, 1.73 feet Southwesterly of the Southeasterly corner of Lot 3 in said Block 9; thence Southwesterly along the Southerly line of said Block 9, 66.62 feet to the point of beginning; ALL in Block 9; ALSO, Lots 3 through 27, inclusive, AND the Southwesterly 10 feet of Lot 2 adjoining, EXCEPT that portion thereof conveyed to King County for street purposes by deed recorded under King County Recording No. 766800; ALL in Block 10; ALSO Lots 1 through 24, inclusive; ALL in Block 11; ALSO Lots 1 through 7, inclusive, and Lots 15 through 28, inclusive; N ALL in Block 12; • N O ALSO Lots 15 through 24, inclusive, EXCEPT that portion of Lots 19 and 20 conveyed to the State of CD Washington for State Road No. 2 (Sunset Boulevard West) by deed JJ recorded under King County Recording No. 2545569; AND EXCEPT that portion of Lots 15, 16, 17, 18, 21, 22, 23 and 24 conveyed to the State of Washington for State Road No. 2 (Sunset Boulevard West) by deed recorded under King County Recording No. 2594162; AND Lots 25 through 28, inclusive; ALL in Block 13; ALSO Lots 1 through 7, inclusive, and Lots 24 through 28, inclusive; ALL in Block 14; ALSO Lots 1 through 24, inclusive, AND Lots 27 and 28; ALL in Block 15; ALSO Lots 1 and 3; EXCEPT portions'conveyed to King County for street purposes by deed recorded under King County Recording No. 766800; Lots 4 through 10, inclusive, AND Lot 12; ALL in Block 16; ALSO, Lots 1 through 14, inclusive, ALL in Block 17; ALSO, Lots 1 through 4, inclusive;, ALL in Block 18. Parcel C: Those portions of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4; AND of the • Northeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4; AND of the Southeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4' of Section 13, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in King County, Washington, bounded on the Southwesterly side by the Northerly boundary line of the 100 foot wide right-of-way of the Pacific Coast Railroad Company, on the Easterly side by the Westerly boundary of the plat of Darlington, as per plat recorded in Volume 14 of Plats on page 7, records of King County, Washington, and on the Northerly side by a line drawn from the Northwesterly corner of Lot 15, in Block 13, of said plat of Earlington and running thence Westerly a distance of 1250 feet to a point on the Northerly line of said Pacific Coast Railroad Company right-of-way, said point being at right angles to the centerline of the main tracks of the Pacific Coast Railroad Company at a point therein distant about 2050 feet Westerly measured along the centerline of the main track of the • Pacific Coast Railroad Company as now located along said.right-of-way from the intersection of said centerline with the East line of said Section 13; EXCEPT right-of-way for Primary State Highway No. 2 (Sunset Boulevard West) conveyed to the State of Washington by deed recorded under King County Recording No. 2594162. ALL Situate in the County of King, State of Washington. . WHEREAS, the owner and purchaser of said described property, hereinafter "the property," desire to impose the following covenants running with the land . as to use, present and future, of the property; • -2 • - I NOW, THEREFORE, the aforesaid owner and purchaser hereby establish, grant • and impose restrictions and covenants running with the land as to the use of the land hereinabove described with respect to the use by the undersigned, their successors, heirs and assigns, as follows: PERMITTED USES ti Parcel A: Permitted uses of the property shall be limited to the uses allowed in the B-1 Business District of Section 4-711, Title IV, Ordinance No. 1628, Code of CD NGeneral Ordinances, City of Renton, King County, Washington. N Q Parcel B: Permitted uses of the northerly 150 feet, parallel to the northerly CD N. property line of Parcel B, and within 150 feet of existing single family zoned lots within Parcel B shall be limited to the uses allowed in the R-2 Residence District of Section 4-708, Title IV, Ordinance No. 1628, Code of General Ordinances, City of Renton, King County, Washington. The remaining portion of Parcel B shall be limited to uses allowed in the R-3 Residence District of Section 4-709A, Title TV, Ordinance No. 1628, Code of General Ordinances, City of Renton,. King County, Washington. Parcel C: Permitted uses of the westerly 700 feet shall be limited to open space and shall be retained in its natural state for use of the public and future residents of the property. The remaining portion of Parcel C shall be limited to uses allowed in the R-2 Residence District of Section 4-708, Title IV, Ordinance No. 1628, Code of General Ordinances, City of Renton, King County, Washington; EXCEPT, that a maximum of 60 dwelling units shall be constructed on this remaining portion of Parcel C. DEVELOPMENT Any and all development of the property shall be subject to the City of Renton approval and shall comply with all the requirements of the Planned Unit Development Ordinance, Chapter 27, Title IV, Ordinance No. 1628, Code of General Ordinances, City of Renton, King County, Washington. A traffic circulation study for traffic and access to, from and within the property shall be submitted to the City of Renton with the Preliminary Development Plan per Section 4-2710, Title IV, Ordinance No. 1628, Code of General Ordinances, City of Renton, King County, Washington. This traffic circulation study shall include an east-west access across the property connecting to Edwards Avenue S.W., shall include one major access point on S.W. Sunset Boulevard and shall include reasonable attempts to connect Edwards Avenue S.W. to S.W. 7th Street. • DENSITY The maximum number of dwelling units that shall be constructed on the property shall be 528 dwelling units. Within the R-2 zoned portions of the property the maximum permissible density shall be 11 dwelling units per acre; EXCEPT, as otherwise specified for Parcel C hereinabove. BUILDING HEIGHT, SETBACKS AND SCREENING In the R-2 zoned portions of the property, structures shall be limited to a building height of 25 feet and set back 50 feet from any abutting single family zoned property. Within the 50-foot setback the first 30 feet abutting single family zoned property shall be used for a landscape screening buffer. • -3- I A substantial landscape screening buffer shall be constructed along the westerly • boundary of Parcel A which may include the Maple Avenue S.W. right-of-way and along the southerly boundaries of Parcels B and C. • EXISTING VEGETATION Until approval of the Preliminary Development Plan, cutting or clearing of existing vegetation or grading of the property shall not occur; EXCEPT, that the CO westerly 700 feet of Parcel C shall be preserved as open space including the Ps existing pond. Q • N DURATION ti Q These covenants shall run with the land and expire on approval by the City of CO ("*.• Renton of a Final Development Plan per Chapter 27, Title IV, Ordinance No. 1628, Code of General Ordinances, City of Renton, King County, Washington. It is further covenanted by the undersigned that if a Preliminary Development Plan is not submitted to the City of Renton pursuant to the Renton Planned Unit Development Ordinance, Chapter 27, Title IV, Ordinance No. 1628, Code of General Ordinances, City of Renton, King County, Washington, within two (2)' years and substantial construction begun within three (3) years of the filing of these covenants, and said construction and development diligently prosecuted toward completion thereafter, the zoning of said property shall without further City of Renton action revert back to the zoning which existed prior to the filing of this document, and these covenants shall become null and void. Parcel A shall revert to S-1 zoning. Parcel B shall revert to R-1 zoning. Parcel C shall revert to GS-1 zoning. The term "substantial construction" shall mean the physical alteration of the land for construction pursuant to the City of Renton approved Final Development Plan as per the above mentioned Planned Unit Development Ordinance and a valid building permit, or construction of required utilities for such development. The above mentioned time periods may be extended for reasonable • cause upon written request to and approval by the Planning Department, City of Renton. Such reasonable cause shall include, but may not be limited to, the requirement of an environmental impact statement pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971. Any violation or breach of these restrictive covenants may be enforced by proper legal procedures in the Superior Court of King County by either the City of Renton or any property owners adjoining subject property who are adversely affected by said breach. Reasonable attorneys' fees incurred during an enforcement proceeding will be borne by the parties whom the court determines are in error and shall be entered as a judgment in such action. 4:17D411.‘""""' Pierce W. Davis Manager, Real Estate Economics and Resource Development Milwaukee Land Company (owner) • -4- • 410 STATE OF Washington ) COUNTY OF Pierce On this I-7th day of 1 L y , 197r, before me personally appeared Pierce W. Davis, the person who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act f7 N- and deed of said person for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. Q IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official (\J seal the day and year first above written. (//i Notary Public in and f the #a e� i1 .J O'• ofc W1S#/, , resielinq,Yn' • Y' ,"" Clint Hergert, President C.H.G. International (purchaser) STATE OF WASHINGTON) COUNTY OF KING) On.this 17th day of • July , 19 78, before me personally appeared Clint Hergert, the person who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said person for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. i T/ Notar/Public i and for the. State of Washington, residing in Tacoma . • RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS - CHG INTERNATIONAL "R-129-18 = Renton City Council 7/24/78 Page 4 Ordinances and Resolutions - Cont. Ordinance #323i Ways and Means Committee recommended second and final reading of :"CHG International the CHG International Rezone R-129-78, from GS-1, R-1 and S-1 to `,Rezone_ B-1, R-3. and R-2. Tom Berger, Tacoma, applicant stated they had signed restrictions and turned over to Hearing Examiner allowing connection of roadway to Edwards. Following discussion MOVED BY TRIMM, SECOND SHANE TO ADOPT ORDINANCE AS READ. Roll Call : All Ayes. CARRIED. Motion to MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND THORPE TO ADJOURN. Mayor ruled the Adjourn motion failed. Roll call vote was requested, resulting as follows: Aye - Clymer, Trimm, Stredicke, Thorpe; No - Shane, Shinpoch, Perry. 4 Ayes' s, 3 No' s. MOTION CARRIED. 11:00 P.M. Reconsider MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND THORPE, TO RECONSIDER PREVIOUS MOTION Motion to TO ADJOURN. CARRIED. All council members were present and Adjourn expressing various opinions regarding extending the meeting. Shane, and Trimm subsequently leaving the council chambers . Proposed motion by Thorpe to suspend rules and proceed past 11:00 p.m. No second. Need for action on funding matters noted. Motion to MOVED BY CLYMER,SECOND THORPE TO SUSPEND RULES AND CONTINUE AGENDA Continue WITH ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS. CARRIED. Ordinance #3234 Ways and Means Committee report recommended first, second and Issuance and Sale final reading of ordinance fixing the amount, form, date, interest of Bonds for LID rate, maturity and denominations of LID 306 Bonds and directing 306 the issuance and sale to Seattle-Northwest Securities .Corporation. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND THORPE TO ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. Roll Call : All five Ayes. (Shane and Trimm absent from chambers) . Resolution #2201 Resolution was read for transfer of funds in the amount of $4,098.02 Transfer of funds- to pay for purchase of Huseland property (Kennydale Beach Parking Purchase of Lot) . MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND THORPE TO ADOPT RESOLUTION AS Huseland Property READ. CARRIED. Resolution #2202 Resolution was read authorizing fund transfer in the amount of Settlement of $15,000 to provide for the settlement of discrimination case with Discrimination Human Rights and Affairs Commission. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND Suit SHINPCCH TO ADOPT RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Voucher The Ways and Means Committee Chairman reported Committee recommendation Approval for council approval of vouchers nos . 18981 thru no. 19166 (machine voids no., 18976 - no. 18980) in the total amount of $649,872.73 as previously approved by department certification as to receipt of goods or services . Also includes LID 302 Warrants: Revenue #R-20 $174,301.58, Cash C-39 $5,854.65, Cash C-40 $1,366.53, Cash C-41 $2,993.20, Cash C-42 $145,507.54, Cash C-43 $18,579.66. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND SHINPOCH TO CONCUR IN VOUCHER APPROVAL RECOMMENDATIONS. CARRIED. ' Moved by Stredicke, Second Clymer to adjourn. Substitute motion by Shinpoch to consider items on Ways and Means Committee report. No second. MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND STREDICKE TO PROCEED WITH MEETING TO COMPLETION OF AGENDA ITEMS. Since 'no meeting next week (5th Monday) , CARRIED. Resolution #2203 Resolution was read,authorizing the Assignment of Franchise Ord: 1987 from Name Change Washington Natural Gas Company, a Delaware Corporation, to a Washington Washington Corporation (aka/Washington Energy Co. ) . MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND Natural Gas SHINPOCH TO ADOPT RESOLUTION AS REAL,. CARRIED. I I ' OF 1 z THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055. • o CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • DELORES A. MEAD 0 •9,o CITY CLERK co- 0,9gT�D SEPT,xste July 26 , 1978 I . Jack Morris 366 Earlington Avenue @0W0 Renton, Washington 98055 Dear Mr. Morris : The Renton City Council, during its regular Meeting on Monday, July 24, 1978 has adopted Ordinance # 3233. A copy is enclosed for your information. Yours very truly, CITY OF RENTON Delores A. Mead, C.M. C. City Clerk DAM:jeb Enclosure • • • • OF J t$ ® THE CITY OF RENTON Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 nail rn CHARLES J. DELAURENTI MAYOR DELORES A. MEAD 090 CITY CLERK o9grFD sEFS,140' July '2 6 , 1978 • Doug Varner 4653 130th S.E. Bellevue, Washington 98006 Dear Mr. Varner: The Renton City Council, during its regular meeting on Monday, July 24, 1978, has adopted OrdiAance 3233. I ' A copy is enclosed for your information. Yours very truly, CITY OF RENTON Delores A. Mead, C.M. C. City Clerk DAM: jeb Enclosure OF R4,4 4 t$ o THE CITY OF RENTON ® MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 n o CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • DELORES A. MEAD 09 co- CITY CLERK o91' o SEPS� July 26, 1978 Jeff Martin 617 S.W. 4th Place Renton, Washington 98055 Dear Mr. Martino The Renton City Council, during its regular meeting on Monday, July 24, 1978 has adopted Ordinance # 3233 , A copy is enclosed for your information. Yours very truly, CITY OF RENTON Delores A. Mead, C.M.C. City Clerk DAM:jeb Enclosure OF R.4,4, o THE CITY OF RENTON t$ MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR DELORES A. MEAD 090 CITY CLERK 0'1' sEP�����Q, July 26 , 1978 K. W. Jacobsen 4327 So 181st S Seattle, Washington 98188 Dear Mr. Jacobsen: The Renton City Council, during its regular meeting on Monday,July 24 , 1978 has adopted Ordinance # 3233. A copy is enclosed for your information. Yours very truly, CITY OF RENTON Delores A. Mead, C.M. C. City Clerk DAM:jeb Enclosure OF RA, 0 THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 n o CHARLES J. DELAURENTI MAYOR • DELORES A. MEAD 9A CD' CITY CLERK 04 7 ED SEP� _t•O J 1 y 24 p 1978 Lucy Osbolt 430 Maple Avenue S.W. Renton, Wasnington 98055 Dear Ms. Osbolt: The Renton City Council, during its regular meeting on Monday,July 24p 1978 has adopted Ordinance ;< 3233. A copy is enclosed for your information. Yours very truly, CITY OF RENTON Delores A. Mead, C.M.C. City Clerk DAM:jeb Enclosure OF RA,A 4b o THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 o CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • DELORES A. MEAD to. CITY CLERK ogT�0 SEPIE Ji zy 26 , 1978 Winona Losey 808 S.W. 4th Place Renton, Washington 98055 Dear Ms. Losey: The Renton City Council, during its regular meeting on Monday, July 24 , 1978 has adopted Ordinance 0 3233. A copy is enclosed for your information. Yours very truly, CITY OF RENTON Delores A. Mead, C.M.C. City Clerk DAM:jeb Enclosure • OF R� O THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 o- CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR DELORES A. MEAD ,0 Co' CITY CLERK o941. 0 SEP�EM��P July 26, 1978 Nancy Shaw 625 S.W. 4th Place Renton, Washington 98055 Dear Ms. Shaw: The Renton City Council, during its regular meeting on Monday, July 24, 1978 has adopted Ordinance #; 3233. A copy is enclosed for your information. Yours very truly, CITY OF RENTON Delores A. Mead, C.M.C. City Clerk DAM:jeb Enclosure OF Rill' �i z THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 neel/ o CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR DELORES A. MEAD 0-53 Co' CITY CLERK 0 9gTFo BEM�` July 260 1978 0 SEP BobrLosey 808 S.W. 4th Place Renton, Washington 98055 Dear Mr. Losey: The Renton City Council, during its regular meeting on Monday, July 24 , 1978, has adopted Ordinance ; 3233. A copy is enclosed for your information. Yours very truly, CITY OF RENTON Delores A. Mead, C.M.C. City Clerk DAM:jeb Enclosure OF R4, • �P z THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 n CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • DELORES A. MEAD co- CITY CLERK 0,91 E SEPT'M' July 266, 1978 • Kenneth Crabtree 423 Lind Avenue 0.W. Renton, Washington 98055 Dear Mr, Crabtree s ' The Renton City Council, during its regular meeting on Monday,guly 24 , 1978 has adopted Ordinance i 3233. A copy is enclosed for your information. Yours very truly, • • CITY OF RENTON Delores A. Mead, C.M. C. City Clerk • DAM:jeb Enclosure OF I t o 'THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 • o CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • DELORES A. MEAD 00 co' CITY CLERK o94 sEFTE� ), ��Q, July 26, 1973 Michael Shaw 625 S.W. 4th Place Renton, Washington 98055 Dear Mr. Shaw: The Renton City Council, during its regular meeting on Monday, July 24, 1978 • has adopted Ordinance 3233 , A copy is enclosed for your information. Yours very truly, CITY OF RENTON • Delores A. Mead, C.M. C. City Clerk DAM:jeb Enclosure • Of 1 A o THE CITY OF RENTON o t$ ® , MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 nmill o CHARLES J. DELAURENTI • MAYOR DELORES A. MEAD 09A co. CITY CLERK 0 o9gTFD SEPT��� July 26 , 1978 Steven Fabre 11682 S.E. 164th Renton, Washington 98055 Dear Mr. Fabre: The Renton City Council, during its regular meeting on Monday, July 24 , 1978 has adopted Ordinance # 3233. A copy is enclosed for your information. Yours very truly, CITY OF RENTON Delores A. Mead, C.M. C. City Clerk DAM:jeb 'Enclosure OF RA, • 40 0 THE CITY OF RENTON `$ ® z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 • 0 ammo o CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR DELORES A. MEAD 09,0 CITY CLERK o9: O SEP� ' July 26 , 1978 • • Rene Fabre 438 S.W. 4th Place Renton, Washington 98055 Dear Ms. Fabre: • The Renton City Council, during its regular meeting on Monday, July 24, 1978 • has adopted Ordinance # 3233 , • A copy is enclosed for your information. Yours very truly, CITY OF RENTON Delores A. Mead, C.M. C. City Clerk DAM:jeb • Enclosure OF 1 $ z THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 Q so. CHARLES J. DELAURENTI,MAYOR • DELORES A. MEAD 0,0 43• CITY CLERK 097, 0D SEP1E°�P 26978 y Jul ,, Randy Blair Wilsey & Ham 631 Strander Blvd. Tukwila, Washington 98188 Dear Mr. Blair: The Renton City Council, during its regular meeting on Monday,July 24 , 1978 has adopted Ordinance 3233 A copy is enclosed for your information. Yours very truly, CITY OF RENTON Delores A. Mead, C.M.C. City Clerk DAM:jeb Enclosure OF RA,A � a z THE CITY OF RENTON 4$ MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 ail CHARLES J. DELAURENTI, MAYOR • DELORES A. MEAD 09,0 CITY CLERK 0,9gT�O SEPTEMe$P July 26 , 1978 Paul Berger COHOG International 1 Wahhington Plaza Tacoma, Washington 98402 Dear Mr. Berger: The Renton City Council, during its regular meeting on Monday, July 24, 1978 has adopted Ordinance r 3233. A copy is enclosed for your information. Yours very truly, CITY OF RENTON Delores A. Mead, C.M. C. City Clerk DAM:jeb Enclosure • Ordinance, as amended, to evidence said rezoning, to-wit: See Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part • hereof as if fully set forth herein. (Said property located west of Hardie Avenue S.W. (Edwards Avenue) east of South 140th Street between S.W. Sunset Boulevard and the Burlington Northern Railroad right-of-way. ) . SECTION II,: This Ordinance shall be effective Upon its passage, approval and five (5) days after its publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 24thtay of July, 1978. Delores . Mead, Cierk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 24th day of July, 1978. r /-) Charles/41 Delaurenti, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: July 28, 1978 • • • Y ,e/o_7z • • CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO.. 3233 • AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM GENERAL CLASSIFICATION DISTRICT (GS-1), • • RESIDENCE SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICT (R-1) , and • SUBURBAN RESIDENCE DISTRICT (S-1) TO BUSINESS • DISTRICT (B-1) , RESIDEICE DISTRICT (R-3) AND RESIDENCE DISTRICT (R-2) (R-12'9-78) • ' WHEREAS under Chapter 7, Title IV (Building Regulations) of Ordinance No. 1628 known as the "Code of General,Ordinances of • the City of Renton", as amended, and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the property hereinbelow described has • heretofore been zoned as General Classification District (GS-I) , Residence. Single Family District (R-1) and Suburban Residence District (S-1) ; and WHEREAS a proper petition for change of zone classification of said property has been filed with the Planning Department on • or about. January 23, 1978 which petition was duly referred to the Hearing Examiner for investigation, study and public hearing, and a public hearing 'having been held, thereon on or about February 28, • 1978, and,said matter having been duly considered by the Hearing Examiner and said zoning request being in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan, as amended, and the City Council having duly considered all matters relevant thereto, and all parties having been heard appearing .in support thereof or in opposition thereto, NOW THEREFORE • THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF' RENTON, WASHINGTON; .DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: • • SECTION I: The following described property in the City of;Renton is 'hereby rezoned to BUSINESS DISTRICT (B-1.), RESIDENCE - DISTRICT (R-3) and RESIDENCE DISTRICT (R-2) as hereinbelow specified, subject to thefindings, conclusions and decision dated March 14, 1978 of the City's Hearing Examiner; ; the Planning Director is • hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning lecember 19, 1977 F.'/ UItIEb ►?. • ` +� i shm i - 1 JAN 23 Ma Order No.,637008 i • • • DESCRIPTION: ��A �� • . PARCEL "A"' to BUSINESSfDISTRI ���� DEPPR6�` • (B-1) • That portion of Government Lots 13 and 14 in Section 18, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington, AND of Tract 3, Supplemental Map of Renton Shore Lands on file in the office of the . Commissioner of Public Lands at Olympia, Washington, AND of vacated Maple Street (formerly Rainier Boulevard) as shown on the Plat of Earlington, as per plat recorded in Volume 14 of Plats on page 7, • records of King County, Washington, described as follows: . Beginning at the intersection of the East margin of said Maple Street, as now established, with the North boundary of the Pacific Coast Railraod 'Company's right-of-way; • thence North 17°19'44" East along said East margin 231.10 feet to • the true point of beginning; thence .North 77°18'45" East 820.14 feet to the East line _of said • Tract 3; thence Southeasterly along said East line 293.54 feet to the. North boundary of said railway right-of-way; thence Westerly along said right-of-way line 917.22 feet to the production Southerly 'of the Easterly line of Lot 1 in Block 16; in • said Plat of Earlington; thence North 24°14'48" West along said production and,along said • East line and along the Northerly production of said East line 153.26 feet to said East line of Maple Street, as now established; :.hence North 17°19'44" East 90.31 feet to the true point of beginning; ,'LSO that portion of said Government Lot 14 AND of said Tract 3, • ' . .'•ying, Northerly of the above-described parcel, lying Easterly of said Last margin of Maple Street and lying Southerly of a line extending cue East from the.Southeast corner of Lot 28 ip Block 10, said Plat of Earlington; TOTE: The bearings hereon refer to the meridian of the 'Lambert Plane { . 1rojecti.on for the State of Washington, North Zone and are equat•:d _ • . : °26'15 clockwise to the bearings used,in the description of th': • : roperty conveyed to Robert L. Edwards by.deed recorded under 1.1ditor's File No. 5726111. PARCEL "B" to RESIDENCE DISTRICT (R-3) • • Tle following lots in Earlington, as per plat recorded in Volume 14 of Plats on page 7, records of King County, Washington: , 7 -tat portion of Lots 22, 23, 24, 26, 27 and 28 lying South of the South line of Primary State Highway No. 2 as conveyed to the State of Washington by deeds recorded under Auditor's File No's. 2538823, 2537568. and4,2534519; Ar.1L in Block 7; Also that portion of Lots 9 and 10 together with one-half 'of the vacated alley adjacent, lying south of the south line of Primary State Highway No. 2; and lots 11, 12 and 13 together with one-half of the vacated alley adjacent, all in Block 8. cont. . . r!! f Description - continued ( No. 2 of 3 I \' ALSO that portion of Lots 3, 4 and 5 described as follows: } Beginning at a point on the Southerly line of said Block 9, 158.00. feet Northeasterly of the Southwest corner of Lot 7 in said Block 9; thence at right angles to said Southerly line 88.36 feet more-or-less + �' to the Northerly line of said Block 9; thence Northeasterly along said Northerly line of said Block 9, 66.00 feet more or less to a point 92.00 .feet Southwesterly of the North- easterly corner of Lot 2 in said- Block 9;- thence Southeasterly 88.36 feet to a point on the Southerly line of said Block 9, 1.73 feet Southwesterly of the Southeasterly corner l of Lot 3 in said Block 9; thence Southwesterly along the Southerly line of said Block 9, 66.62 feet to, the point of beginning; ALL in Block 9; ALSO, Lots 3 through 27, inclusive, AND the Southwesterly 10 feet of Lot 2 adjoining, EXCEPT that. portion thereof conveyed to King County for street purposes by deed recorded under King County Recording No. 766800; ALL in Block 10; , ALSO Lots 1 through 24, inclusive; ALL in Block 11; ALSO Lots 1 through 7, inclusive, and Lots 15 through 28, inclusive; • . . ALL in Flock 12; ALSO Lots 15. through 24, inclusive, EXCEPT •tiat portion of Lots 19 and 20 conveyed to the State of Washingt.)n for State Road No. 2 (Sunset Boulevard West) by deed recorded under. King County Recording No. 2545569; AND EXCE' P that portion of Lots 15, 16, 17, 18, 21, 22, 23 and 24 conveyed to the State of Washington for State Road No. 2 (Sunset • Boulevarc West) . by deed •redorded under King County Recording No. 2594162; AND Lote :25 through 28, inclusive; ALL in Block 13; ALSO Lot: 1 through 7, inclusive, and Lots 24 through 28, inclusive; ALL in E.l ock.14; • ALSO, Lcts 1 through 24, inclusive, AND Lots 27 and .28; ALL in. • - Block 15; ALSO, Lc l : 1 and 3, • EXCEPT pc -tions conveyed to King County for street purposes by deed recorded .ender King County Recording No. 766800; Lots 4 through 10, inclusive, AND Lot 12; ALL in Block 16; ALSO, Lots 1 through 14, inalusive, 'ALL in Block 17; • • ALSO, Lct ; 1 through 4, inclusive; ALL in Block 18. PARCEL "cam to RESIDENCE DISTRICT (R-2) •,• Those pci :ions of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4; AND 'of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4; AND Of the Southeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 ,of Section 13, Township '23' North, Range 4 East, W.M., in King County, Washington, bounded on the Southwesterly side by the -continued • - ' J JtQe� NJ. bJ,UUk ' ' Description continued No. 3 of 3 Northerly boundary line of the 100 foot wide right-of-way of• the Pacific Coast Railroad Company, on the Easterly side by the Westerly boundary of the plat of Earlington, as per plat recorded in Volume 14• . of Plats on page 7, records of King County, Washington, and on the Northerly side by a line drawn from the Northwesterly corner of Lot 15, in Block 13, of said plat of Earlington and running thence Westerly a distance of 1250 feet to a point on the Northerly line of said Pacific Coast Railroad Company right-of-way, said point being at right angles to the centerline of the main tracks of the Pacific Coast Railroad Company at a point therein distant about 2050 feet Westerly measured along the centerline of the main track of the . Pacific Coast Railroad Company as now located along said right-of-way from the intersection of said centerline with the East line of said Section 13; • EXCEPT right-of-way for Primary State Highway No. 2 (Sunset Boulevard West) conveyed to the State of Washington by deed recorded under King County Recording No. 2594162. ALL Situate in the County of King, State of Washington. 3 • • • • • • • • • 1 • • .....\\:-...:,s _..ss. -- `•� ,^^i.� -'!-.� "^YCIC ; c2I ;c 10 /:+x r\ Sp NS, , W. ;4 c d3' �Q o 11 '. --- ..y` -. j. , r �`r'':F .' °4 i.�.Gam' ✓ '9�^ 8 A. \ Q \ \\ - g �- [[ a >2;/Iiv S(!' (�T7 "t T.la ems_�•,,_ t . rot 3�rt Lot3 Ty �_ ST' / 6 ro':)e 6 as�� y•- n GO y `` \- 2'26 Acres \ GS I. i r•• i a :� (�J k2•• 'm _• \\ ' (� WARS I.Ro[DkxK S.co �,5+ r- Q ' _!f_ = S.iy• ' b•s :,':en /all ei 4ii s +t 9 P - -.•�4J �� ` ....,,� Sryr�7•I •� •� T u Pau[ R R _--yl,[-N,, `r1• Z�• • .S` -' 'I '�... `. 7 _ .. ran 4,..31 ' �\°,a. - • Ty -•• S gy p, :: ,7: !`W l'' �„ -.�, -• -\ ' • a.L !a- ��/�Sk •cam/ ~� �.�i �`a �:' ������ � ��ei9 cppg t•_ �M:C�.,_• MIL. �K_c S' L �� - r .)•7. K' Y v� 1b4 / -_ _ E '', T & cAc 'IC F•: ..R:DAD • �.~�-` I/ 10 9 $Ty •,..5: ,..,Zi=.�1 _ v .i. �•t- ``� �, 5 5 J . -+1 ..1" CA: .. PTA NO C Y1._ r 6., . ; 1j P, Ep- ,,,‘,....... .�,. �1r i,,, ,•, c:: Mop ♦ „3 O l Gov't Lo ti o aFca s< ���6}6} se '•3�.�U �. �� " CMILAG • .............____________„----.7.-• . , .--- - --1_,...(.1< 11 TRACr .. EUGr k R PSALM =1�.`RENTO SMOFIE .. i . • i ef ' c' q ! LI MT R.L / RDBEAI P.4[1 INC ISIu .fps yr. ,� I a t Ii' is i ! a-.1-._ w- 7r -.— z _ —'-- __ gre An A Renton City Council 7/17/178 Page 3 Old Business - Cont. Funding - Senior Center Building Advisory Committee Chairman Clymer submitted Senior Citizens report recommending that the city utilize the'1979 Housing and Center (cont.) Community Development Program to secure an additional $50,000 for use as the project's contingency fund. Also recommending that if not utilized for cost overruns these funds be used to reinstate a portion of the deductive alternatives and other appropriate appurtenances. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND SHINPOCH TO CONCUR IN COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. The Chairman expressed pleasure at getting the project underway after many hearings and meetings. Request for Utilities Committee Chairman Shane submitted report recommending City Sewer city sewer service be allowed as requested by Drs. Lomas and Service Bockoven subject to conditions of 1)owner immediately petition for requested by annexation to the City and to pursue and promote said annexation V Drs. Lomas/ to its completion, 2)owner submit development plans to the City Bockoven for review and to comply with all appropriate City ordinances. MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND SHANE TO CONCUR IN COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. 1949 Easement The Utilities Committee report further recommended that Council Release concur in 1949 Easement Release requested by Invest-West/Rainier Village and authorize realignment easement. MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND CLYMER TO CONCUR IN COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. Award of Contract Utilities Committee report recommended award of contract, LID #284, LID #284 Sanitary Sewers, vicinity Jones Ave. NE, to Lundberg Construction Co. in the total amount of $196,900.59. MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND SHANE TO CONCUR IN .COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION. Mayor & Clerk to sign contract.CARRIED. Recess MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND SHANE TO RECESS, 9:45 P.M. CARRIED. Reconvened at 10:00 P.M. Roll Call: All council members present as previously listed. Senior Citizen Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke submitted report recommend- Reduced Utility ing acceptance of the new Senior Citizen income requirements for eli- Rates gibility for reduced utility rates as proposed (Single $4,000 to $4,800. Married $6,000 to $7,200). by the Administration with referral to the City Attorney for the drafting of the proper ordinance which would reflect annual Social Security increases. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND. CLYMER, TO CONCUR IN COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. Analysis of Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke submitted report recommend- Mandatory Age ing that the matter of performance analysis which will replace the Retirement mandatory age retirement be referred to the Personnel Department and the Administration with a report back to Committee prior. to . December 1978. MOVED BY SHINPOCH, SECOND CLYMER TO CONCUR IN COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. • Introduction ' Councilman Stredicke introduced new press member Barbara Krema of "Renton Reporter" the "Renton Reporter". Presentation Councilman Stredicke recommended presentation of an award to Harold of Award O'Hara for his act of retrieving Bruce Wehrer injured while diving Suggested . into the river from the Cedar River Bridge. Also, commending quick response of Renton Aid Car and Valley Medic I Uni.t. .: ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS SCS Holdings, Ltd. Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke submitted report recommend- Rezone Ordinance ' ing second and final reading of Ordinance changing the zoning classi- fication of certain properties within the City of Renton from residence district R-1 to residence district R-3. Chairman Stredicke requested that second and final reading be withheld one week for report to be secured whether any conditions required need to be complied with prior to adoption of the Ordinance, i .e., filing of . .. plan with Utilities. f' (7' & U k Renton City Council 7/17/78 page 4 Ordinances and Resolutions - Cont. First Reading Ways and.'Means Committee recommended first reading of the CHG CHG International International Rezone R-129-78, from GS-1, R-1 and S-1 to B-1, Rezone R-3 and R-2. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND CLYMER TO REFER BACK TO WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED. First Reading Ways and Means Committee recommended first reading of the Stanley Stanley E. Stone E. Stone, Rezone R-165-78, G to R-3. Rezone First Reading Ways and Means Committee recommended first reading of the Marvin D. Marvin D. Wehrman Wehrman Rezone R-166-78, G to B-1. Rezone First Reading Ways. and Means Committee recommended first reading of the Arthur D. Arthur D. Swanson Swanson Rezone R-167-78, G to B-1. Rezone Councilman Stredicke requested presentation by Planning Director Ericksen of area maps indicating connection of the streets, if' and when they were dedicated. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND SHANE TO REFER REZONES BACK TO WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. Aerial Map - Upon request regarding new city aerial map, Planning Director Council Chambers Ericksen displayed new map being prepared for the Council Chambers. Resolution #2199 Resolution was read fixing date of August 21, 1978 for public hearing NE 14th St. on the proposed vacation of a' portion of NE 14th :St. (Vac 6-78),, Vacation-Public petitioned by Hazel Chenaur et al. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND Hearing 8/21/78 CLYMER TO ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution #2200 Resolution was read fixing date of August 28, 1978 for public hearing NW 3rd St. on the proposed vacation of. a portion of NW 3rd St.(Vac 5-78), Vacation = Public .petitioned by Robin/Barbara Little et al . MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND Hearing 8/28/78 CLYMER TO ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. CONSENT AGENDA The following items are distributed to all Council Members and adopted by one motion without separate di'scussion. (adopting motion follows agenda items). Glacier Park Hearing Examiner'submitted File No. FP-176-78: Final' Plat for Company Final Glacier Park Company - Orillia Industrial Park Division No. 1 ' Plat Refer to Ways and Means Committee for proper resolution. Senior Citizens' . July 12, 1978 bid opening, three bids received; Senior Citizens,' • Center Watermain Center Watermain Project. Refer to. Senior Center Building Advisory Project Committee , Planning, Dept. , Public Works Dept. , Utilities Committee, and, Community Services Committee. (See attached tabulation) Settlement of Request from. Gwen Marshall , Finance Director, ,for transfer of funds Discrimination re settlement of discrimination suit. Refer to. Ways and Means Suit Committee for proper resolution. Name Change ' -Washington Natural Gas Company, a' Delaware Corporation, notification. Washington of name change and request of Council fortransfer and Assignment of Natural Gas Franchise to Washington Energy Company, a Washington Corporation, refer to Ways and Means Committee and City Attorney for proper legislation. Dean.W. Bitney : Hearing Examiner's recommendation re Bitney Rezone R-179-78 re . Rezone additional time pending Planning Commission determination of Comprehensive Land Use designation. Refer to Planning Commission for recommendation. - Approval of - MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND PERRY, COUNCIL ADOPT THE CONSENT AGENDA Consent Agenda AS PREPARED. CARRIED. . ef2- WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT JULY 17 , 1978 The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following ordinance for second and final reading: SCS Holdings , Ltd. Rezone • The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following ordinances for first reading: CHG International. Rezone Stanley E. Stone Rezone Arthur ,D. Swanson Rezone Marvin D. Wehrman Rezone The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following resolutions for'.adoption: NE 14 St. - Street Vacation - Setting Public Hearing date of August 21, 1978 NW 3rd St. - Street Vacation - Setting PUblic Hearing date of August 28 , 1978 Ric1kt Stredicke, . Chairman N r.Q.... aroma,, - ‘49 Barbara Shinpochch G ge Pe ry �'n 1. 1 "0S- , 1' v � � rS> 'S,' - i 1 ce (y� Y'.y'+Stint,, :'1 •,V �� n CityCouncil :7/'10/78 Page 4 „( Consent Agenda - Cont.' • Bid Openings: , ' - .:,, ,t ,.: ,::1978_Asphalt• June 23, 1978 bid,opening,_ four:. bids 'received;, '..197,8 Asphalt , . Resurfacing - ' Resurfacing. . Refer'to'Transportation'Commi ttee-and Publ i c Works " ' ' Department: .,.;, , l 5 1978;bid.••,o ening, two''?bids'; rece,i,ved, ; LID #284.,, Sanitary„ -:. LID #284' Ju y ,.p,. 9 .;- . ... ,: .. :,- :, 'Sanitary Sewers Sewers, Jones Ave', NE• , Refer to..Pub'.l�ic`'Works .Department.and' Utilities Committee• Rezones f r:rezone^'`:R=]29-78,. GS-1 to: R-3; (CHG .International C;H1G International request` o , ,;; R-1'.to. R=3;" S-1.•to B-1. Hardie,SSE,.between''``Sunset' Blvd., W: Wand.: , - ,BN :R/W. Refer.to Ways and Means.:Commi ttee`r-_ ` Stanley E. Stone Stanley:,E,. Stone ('request for:,:rezone,• R-165-78,',G' to R-3. NE'.4t ., between Greenwood Cemetery and ,Union Ave NE Refer to Ways and , Means `Committee: ' Marvin D. Wehrman Marvin-.D.. Wehrman, request for rezone,:;R- 66-78, G to B-1,' NE"4th St. between Greenwood,Cemetery:,and ,Uni:on.=Ave ,;,NE:.:,: Refer to Ways'. and Means` Comnii ttee. , �, , . z� : .:,. Arthur. D. Swanson Arthur D:--_Swanson request for''rezone;''R16.7-78, G to B-1, NE 4th St-, ,' between Greenwood Cemetery and: Union Ave:.;,NE',..; ;.Refer to Ways and ,r, Means Committee ,E, :SCS Holdings SCS Holdings '-Ltd: request':fo;r're one, R`-177-78;''R-1 to''R-3' property at 417 Wells Ave'. South. -'Refer ;to ,Ways''and Means Committee. • • ; Planning Dept. Council man,Stredicke requested information be presented next Presentation Monday. ,,by the Planning Department re requests ,for :rezones' Requested by. Stone, Wehrman, and Swanson':., Mayor,,adv,ised City Clerk-to ':', notify Planning Department. , . , Street Vacation Petition for street vacation portion of;::NE, '14th Street, West. Of ' 'NE 14th Street Edmonds Ave. NE 'filed by Michael M. Han'is`;' Refer: to .Public Works c7 Dept. for.validation'of petition and recommendation' as to' appraisal, to the 'Board' of Public Works:, for recommendation re :retention.of - - ' utility easements, to the Transportation Committee, to the'-City ' - Attorney for resolution, setti n;g date_,'of 'August 21, 1978 for public , hearing.. Claim for Claim for 'd amages was filed *by-. Gloria Kay:JFacobs, alleging damage . TM.4.,, Damages , by :breakage of water main. ,. Refer to.City .'Attorney and Insurance , -Carrier. Appointment of Letter from Earl Clymer, .as,. Acting Mayor, recommended appointment of ' Police Officer . Dennis Eugene` Gerber as a police offs ce'.i n..the, Renton Police Department : effective July.. 16, 1978. - ,• , ,,,A;`:,-.�jrr�` Senior Citizens June i 30, 1978 bid openi ng, two bids -rece:i-ved;"`',Senior Citizens' Center , `` Bid Opening • Construction•••• Refer to Mayort: Advisory`Building Committee. . . 1949 Easement Public, Works 'Director request;for:.reli nqutshment ,on .1949 sanitary:. Release and ' ' *sewer easement':and ,new; realignment, for,1InvestWest/Rainier Village- ' _New Realignment *MOTION BY SHANE, SECOND STRE'DICKE TQ.''REFER''TO°UTILITIES COMMITTEE After discussion as to the location and_' ;problem requiring the new , easement,, and releaser Moved by Stredi cke:,.' second Shinpoch to; refer to, ,the Administration to report back '.n'ext' week: " Roll cal l 'vote: 4, no's, 3 aye's: Motion lost'. *Original`"motion •CARRIED 'referring to Utilities, Committee, . . , - . , A proval P of MOVED BY; CLYMER, SECOND' PERRY',', COUNCIL ADOPT, THE CONSENT AGENDA , ' Cjonsent Agenda AS AMENDED. . ''CARRIED• . ti u DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS -7 L >- w' UJ WHEREAS, the Milwaukee Land Company is the owner of the following re ei (L- property in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington; and C.H.G. International, a firm incorporated in the State of Washington, has contracted to purchase the following real property in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington, described as follows: • Parcel A: That portion of Government Lots 13 and 14 in Section 18, Township 23 North, Range. 5 East, W.M. , in King 'County, Washington, AND of Tract • 3, Supplemental Map of Renton Shore Lands on file in the office of the Commissioner of- Public Lands at Olympia, Washington, AND of vacated Maple Street (formerly Rainier Boulevard) as shown on the Plat of . Earlington, as per plat recorded in Volume 14 of Plats on page 7, . records of King County, Washington, described as follows: • Beginning at the intersection of the East margin of said 'Maple Street, as now established, with, the North boundary of the Pacific Coast Railroad Company's right-of-way; thence North 17°19'44" East along said East margin 231.10 feet to the true point-of beginning; • ' thence North 77'18'45" East 820.14 feet to the East line of Said Tract 3; ' thence Southeasterly along said east line 293.54 feet to the North . boundary Of said railway right-of-way; thence Westerly along said right-of-way line 917.22 'feet to the production Southerly of the Easterly line of Lot 1 in Block 16, in said Plat of Earlington; thence North 24°14'48"West along said ,production and along said, , East line and along the Northerly production of said East line 153.26 feet to said East line of Maple Street, as now. established; thence North 17°19'44" East 90.31 feet to the true point of beginning; ALSO. that portion of said Government Lot 14 AND of said Tract 3, lying Northerly of the above-described parcel, .lying Easterly of said East margin of Maple Street and lying Southerly of a line extending due East 'from the Southeast corner of Lot 28 in Block 10, said Plat of Earlington; . NOTE: The bearings hereon refer to ,the .meridian•'of the Lambert Plane Projection ,for. the State of Washington, North Zone and are equated 1°26'15" clockwise to- the bearings used in the description of the property conveyed to Robert L. Edwards by deed recorded under Auditor's File NO: 5726111. Parcel B: The following lots in Earlington, as per plat recorded in Volume 14 of Plats on page 7, records of King County, Washington: That portion of Lots 22; 23, 24, 26, 27 and 28 lying South of the . ' South line of Primary State• Highway No. 2 as conveyed to the State of Washington by deeds recorded under Auditor's File No's. 2538823, ' 2537568 and 2534519; . ALL in Block 7; ' ALSO that portion Of Lots 9 and, 10 together with one-half of the vacated alley adjacent, lying south of the south• line of Primary ' State Highway No. 2; and Lots 11, 12 and 13 together with one-half of the vacated alley adjacent, all in Block 8. ALSO that portion of 'Lots 3, 4 and 5 described as follows: Beginning at a point on the Southerly line of said Block 9, 158.00 feet Northeasterly of the• Southwest corner of Lot 7 in said Block 9; thence at right angles to said Southerly line 88.36 feet'more-or-less to the Northerly line of said Block 9; . thence Northeasterly along said Northerly line of said Block 9,. 66.00 feet more or less to a point 92:00 feet Southiaesterly of the North- easterly corner of Lot 2 in said Block 9; thence Southeasterly 88.36 feet to a point on the Southerly line of said Block 9, 1.73 feet Southwesterly of the Southeasterly corner of Lot 3 in said Block 9; thence Southwesterly along the Southerly line of said Block 9, 66.62 feet to the point of beginning; ALL in Block 9; ALSO, Lots 3 through 27, inclusive, AND the Southwesterly 10 feet of Lot 2 adjoining, EXCEPT that portion thereof conveyed to King County for street purposes by deed recorded under King County Recording No. 766800; ALL in Block 10; ALSO Lots 1 through 24, inclusive; ALL in Block 11; ALSO Lots 1 through 7, inclusive, and Lots 15 through 28, inclusive; ALL in Block 12; ALSO Lots 15 through 24, inclusive, . EXCEPT that portion of Lots 19 and' 20 conveyed to the State of Washington for State Road No. 2 (Sunset Boulevard West) by deed recorded under King County Recording No. 2545569; AND EXCEPT that portion of Lots 15, 16, 17, 18, 21, 22, 23 and 24 conveyed to the State of Washington for State Road No. 2 (Sunset Boulevard West) by deed recorded under King County Recording No. 2594162; -AND Lots 25 through 28, inclusive; ALL in Block 13; ALSO Lots 1 through 7, inclusive, and Lots 24 through 28, inclusive; ALL in Block 14; • ALSO Lots 1 through .24, inclusive, AND Lots 27 and 28; ALL in Block 15; ALSO Lots 1 and 3; • EXCEPT portions conveyed to King County for street purposes by deed recorded under King County Recording No. 766800; Lots 4 through 10, inclusive, AND Lot 12; ALL in Block 16; • ALSO, Lots 1 through 14, inclusive, ALL in Block 17; • ALSO, Lots 1 through 4, inclusive; ALL in Block 18. Parcel C: Those portions of. the Northwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4; AND of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4; AND of the Southeast 1/4,of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 13,. Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington, bounded on the Southwesterly side by the Northerly boundary line of the 100 foot wide right-of-way of .the Pacific Coast Railroad Company, on the Easterly side by the Westerly boundary of the plat of Earlington, as per plat recorded in Volume 14 of Plats on page 7, records of King County, Washington, and on the Northerly side by a line drawn from the Northwesterly corner of Lot 15, in Block 13, of said plat of Earlington and running thence Westerly a distance of 1250 feet to a point on the Northerly line of said Pacific Coast Railroad Company right-of-way, said•point being at right angles to the centerline of the main tracks of the . Pacific Coast Railroad Company at a. point therein distant about 2050 feet Westerly measured along the centerline.of the main track of the Pacific Coast Railroad Company as now located along said right-of-way from the intersection of said centerline with the East line of said Section 13; EXCEPT right-of-way for Primary State Highway No. 2 (Sunset Boulevard West) conveyed to the State of Washington by deed recorded under King County Recording No. 2594162. ALL Situate in the County of King, State of Washington. • WHEREAS, the owner and purchaser of said described property, hereinafter "the property," desire to impose the following covenants running with the land as to use, present and future, of the property; -2- - • NOW, THEREFORE, the aforesaid owner and purchaser hereby establish, grant and impose restrictions and covenants running with the land as to the use of the land hereinabove described with respect to the use by the undersigned, their successors, heirs and assigns, as follows: PERMITTED USES Parcel A: Permitted uses of the property shall be limited to the uses allowed in the B-1 Business District of Section 4-711, Title IV, Ordinance No. 1628, Code of General Ordinances, City of Renton, King County, Washington. Parcel B: Permitted uses of the northerly 150 feet, parallel to the northerly property line of Parcel B, and within 150 feet of existing single family zoned lots within Parcel B shall be limited to the uses allowed in the R-2 Residence District of Section 4-708, Title IV, Ordinance No. 1628, Code of General Ordinances, City of Renton, King County, Washington. The remaining portion of Parcel B shall be limited to uses allowed in the R-3 Residence District of Section 4-709A, Title IV, Ordinance No. 1628, Code of General Ordinances, City of Renton, King County, Washington. Parcel C: . Permitted uses of the westerly 700 feet shall be limited to open space and shall be retained in its natural state for use of the public and future residents of the property. The remaining portion of Parcel C shall be limited to uses allowed in the R-2 Residence District of Section 4-708, Title IV, Ordinance No. 1628, Code of General Ordinances, City of Renton, King County, Washington; EXCEPT, that a maximum of 60 dwelling units shall be constructed on this remaining portion of Parcel C. DEVELOPMENT Any and all development of the property shall be subject to the City of Renton approval and shall comply with all the requirements of the Planned Unit Development Ordinance, Chapter 27, Title IV, Ordinance No. 1628, Code of General Ordinances, City of Renton, King County, Washington. A traffic circulation study for traffic and access to, from and within the property shall be submitted to the City of Renton with the Preliminary Development Plan per Section 4-2710, Title IV, Ordinance No. 1628, Code of General Ordinances, City of Renton, King County; Washington. This traffic circulation study shall include an east-west access across the property connecting to Edwards Avenue S.W., shall include one major access point on S.W. Sunset Boulevard and shall include reasonable attempts to connect Edwards Avenue S.W. to S.W. 7th Street. DENSITY The maximum number of dwelling units that shall be constructed on the property shall be 528 dwelling units. Within the R-2 zoned portions of the property the maximum permissible density shall be 11 dwelling units per acre; EXCEPT, as otherwise specified for Parcel C hereinabove. BUILDING HEIGHT, SETBACKS AND SCREENING In the R-2 zoned portions of the property, structures shall be limited to a building height of 25 feet and set back 50 feet from any abutting single family zoned property. Within the 50-foot setback the first 30 feet abutting single family zoned property shall be used for a landscape screening buffer. -3- A substantial landscape screening buffer shall be constructed along the westerly boundary of Parcel A which may include the Maple Avenue S.W. right-of-way and along the southerly boundaries of Parcels B and C. EXISTING VEGETATION Until approval of the Preliminary Development Plan, cutting or clearing of existing vegetation or grading of the property shall not occur; EXCEPT, that the westerly 700 feet of Parcel C shall be preserved as open space including the existing pond. • DURATION These covenants shall run with the land and expire on approval by the City of Renton of a Final Development Plan per Chapter 27, Title IV, Ordinance No. 1628, Code of General Ordinances, City of Renton, King County,. Washington. It .is • - further covenanted by the undersigned that if a Preliminary Development Plan is not submitted to the City of Renton pursuant to the Renton Planned Unit Development Ordinance, Chapter 27, Title IV, Ordinance No. 1628, Code of General ' Ordinances, City of Renton, King County, Washington, within two (2) years and substantial construction begun within three (3) years of the filing of these covenants, and said construction and development diligently prosecuted toward completion thereafter; the zoning of said property shall without further City of Renton action revert back to the zoning which existed prior to the filing of this document, and these covenants shall become null and void, Parcel A shall revert to S-1 zoning. Parcel B shall revert to R-1 zoning. Parcel C shall revert to GS-1 zoning. The term "substantial construction" shall mean the physical alteration of the land for construction pursuant to the City of Renton approved Final Development Plan as per the above mentioned Planned Unit Development Ordinance and a valid building permit, or construction of required utilities for , ,such development. The above mentioned time periods may be extended for reasonable cause upon written request to and approval by the Planning Department, City of Renton.. Such reasonable cause shall include, but may not be limited to, the requirement of an environmental impact statement pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971. Any violation or breach of these restrictive covenants may be enforced by proper legal procedures in the Superior,Court of King County by either the City of Renton Or any property owners adjoining subject property who are adversely affected by said breach. Reasonable attorneys' fees incurred during an enforcement proceeding will be borne by the parties whom the court determines are in error and shall be entered as a judgment in such action. . • • -0;4104-00-42. 4:7D1:641""66-•-• . • Pierce W. Davis Manager, Real Estate Economics and Resource Development Milwaukee Land Company (owner) • • -4- • STATE OF Washington ) COUNTY OF Pierce On this I -7th day of , u L. , 19,f, before me personally appeared Pierce W. Davis, the person who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said person for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. 7 Notary Public in and for thetklte of v , residing'in` i' • • i tip. • ` , F _ Clint Hergert, President -- • C.H.G. International (purchaser) • STATE OF WASHINGTON) COUNTY OF KING) On this 17th day of July • , 19 78 , before me personally appeared Clint Hergert, the person who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said person for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. • 6/,%j4i /2, i,.47;:v1-1 Notar Public i and for the State of Washington, residing in Tacoma . -5- 4 1 0 THE CITY OF RENTON © ' MUNICIPAL•BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 ha 8 op CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER Ap �4 L. RICK BEELER , 235-2593 • �4ttO SEPIA: June 26, 1978 Members, Renton City Council Renton, Washington RE: File No. R-129-78; . C.H.G. International Request for Rezone. Dear Council Members: The referenced request was approved by the Examiner on March 14, 1978, but as a result of a.request for reconsideration, dated March 27, 1978, the matter was continued by the Examiner pending receipt of additional material from the applicant. On June 26, 1978, the attached memorandum was received from the applicant rescinding the previous request for reconsideration and requesting completion of the application process. The Examiner's Report and Recommendation on this matter was transmitted to you on April 5, 1978, and we request that the matter be reviewed prior to placement of this item on the Council agenda of July 10, 1978. Sinc ly:IJ) L. Rick Beeler - Hearing Examiner - cc: Planning Department City Clerk Attachment - _FL G INTERNATIONAL June 23, 1978 City of Renton Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Attention: Mr. L. Rick Beeler Hearing Examiner RE: Erlington Woods .- Rezone No. 129-78 Dear Mr. Beeler: As a result of further consultation with the planning department, we wish to rescind our previous request for reconsideration of your recommendations for this rezoning. We would appreciate your efforts in placing the rezoning on the next council 's agenda. We are preparing the documents for our P.U.D./Master Plan application and expect to submit them shortly. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. Sincerely, CHG International , Inc. Paul S. Berger Vice President PSB:dak RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER .JUN 2 61978 AM PM '71819t10,11t12111213,41516i ONE WASHINGTON PLAZA • TACOMA, WASHINGTON 98402 • (206) 383-3484 0 0f'4 RSA 414., v-. CITY OF RENTON 7. Urce. MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON.WASH. 98055 •• pR CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER L. RICK BEELER , 235 -2593 O ' fD SEP1t*- • June 26, 1978 Mr. Paul S. Berger Vice President, C.H.G. International One Washington Plaza Tacoma, Washington 98042 RE: File No. R-129-78, C.H.G. International Request for Rezone. Dear Mr. Berger: I am in receipt of your letter of June 23, 1978, which rescinds your previous request for reconsideration. The complete file on this matter has been forwarded to the City Clerk, and the application will be placed on the City Council agenda of July 10, 1978. You will be notified•of all subsequent action taken by the City Council regarding the request. • Sinceregry, • • L. Rick Beeler • Hearing Examiner Of Ft v 41 THE CITY OF RENTON 7. MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 pp f CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR 9 LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER co- 'O �Q. L. RICK BEELER . 235-2593 June 26, 1978 Members, Renton City Council Renton, Washington RE: File 'No. R-129-78; C.H.G. International Request for Rezone. Dear Council Members: The referenced request was approved by the Examiner on March 14, 1978, but as a result of a request for reconsideration, dated March 27, 1978, the matter was continued by the Examiner pending receipt of additional material from the applicant. On June 26, 1978, the attached memorandum was received from the applicant rescinding the previous request for reconsideration and requesting completion of the application process. The Examiner's Report and Recommendation on this matter was transmitted to you on April 5, 1978, and, we request that the matter be reviewed prior to placement of this item on the Council agenda of July 10, 1978. Sinc ly,,..�j L. Rick Beeler Hearing Examiner cc: Planning Department City Clerk Attachment CHG INTERNATIONAL June 23, 1978 City of Renton Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Attention: Mr. L. Rick Beeler Hearing Examiner RE: Erlington Woods - Rezone No. 129-78 Dear Mr. Beeler: As a result of further consultation with the planning department, we wish to rescind our previous request for reconsideration of your recommendations for this rezoning. We would appreciate your efforts in placing the rezoning on the next council 's agenda. We are preparing the documents for our P.U.D./Master Plan application and expect to submit them shortly. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. Sincerely, CHG International , Inc. • Paul S. Berger Vice President PSB:dak RECEWED CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER ,111N261978 . AM PM 7u8r9110111112i 1 t2131415,6 ONE WASHINGTON PLAZA • TACOMA, WASHINGTON 98402 ® (200) 383-3484 II 0 R.4JL �1 . 0 THE CITY OF RENTON CIO `Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 o� CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR 9 LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER Ap ‘<.,q- L. RICK BEELER . 235-2593 •P4lfD SEPI-�� March 22, 1978 Members, Renton City Council Renton, Washington RE: File No. R-129-78; C.H.G. International Dear Council Members: Attached is the Examiner's Report and Recommendation on the referenced rezone request, dated March 14, 1978. The appeal period for the application expires on March 28, 1978, and the report is being forwarded to you for review by the Planning and Development Committee following the seven-day period from the date of publication. The complete file will be transmitted to the City Clerk on March 29, 1978 and will be placed on the Council agenda on April 10, 1978. If you require additional assistance or information regarding this matter, please contact the undersigned. Sinc- -1 0111156,4-11"---.... .,-,.12111X--7-4" L. -ick :eeler Hearing Examiner cc: Planning Department City Clerk Attachment � OF Rv 0 THE CITY OF RENTON `/ 400 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON.WASH. 98055 p ® CHARLES J. DELAURENTI MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER �Q- L. RICK BEELER , 235-2593 D4TED SEP1��� April 5, 1978 Members, Renton City Council Renton, Washington RE: File No. R-129-78; C.H.G. International Rezone. Dear Council Members: On March 27, 1978, a request for reconsideration of the Examiner's recommendation on the referenced rezone application was received within the fourteen-day appeal period established by ordinance. After review of the record, it seems appropriate to reopen the public hearing to review certain aspects of the application. Therefore, the matter will not be placed on. the Council agenda on April 10, 1978 as previously stated in the cover letter of the Examiner's Report and Recommendation, dated March 14, 1978 which was transmitted to you on March 22, 1978. You will receive copies of all subsequent reports relating to this matter. Si re , /' L. R ck Beeler Hearing Examiner cc: Planning Department V �4 ,� Z THE CITY OF RENTON al MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 z o o-- °' CHARLES J. DELAURENTI • MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 'O • O �Q� L. RICK BEELER , 235-2593 q1 0 SEP14O April 4, 1978 TO: Mike Smith, Planning Department FROM: L. Rick Beeler, Hearing Examiner SUBJECT: C.H.G. International Rezone; File No. R-129-78 Per the attached letter to Paul S. Berger, I am reopening the public hearing in order to permit submittal of a conceptual P.U.D. plan. This plan could potentially impact my final recommendation regarding the rezone of Parcels B and C to the City Council. You will notice that I'have asked him to contact you concerning submittal of the plan and scheduling of the hearing. Ample time should be allowed for staff to formulate a recommendation relative to the plan. As we have discussed in review of other rezone applications, the level of detail of the P.U.D. plan that is submitted is a decision of the applicant. However, please remind Mr. Berger that any rezone could potentially be conditioned upon development according to that specific P.U.D. plan or portions thereof. Please contact me for confirming the public hearing data. Thank you.„ L. Rick Beeler Hearing Examiner Attachment Of Et ;� . o THE CITY OF RENTON ? MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 o o CHARLES J. DELAURENTI • MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER p (c.Q- L. RICK BEELER , 235-2593 4tED SEpZ April 4, 1978 Paul S. Berger C.H.G. International One Washington Plaza Tacoma, Washington 98402 Dear Mr. Berger: • After reviewing, the record and your letters of March 24 and 29, 1978, it seems appropriate in this case to reopen the public hearing relative to Parcels B and C., The previous hearing pertained to only the land • use issues. It is apparent that perhaps your conceptual P.U.D. plan could impact these issues. In order for, the conceptual P.U.D. plan to be reviewed with the rezone the public hearing must be reopened. This will afford all parties of record the opportunity to ,comment upon the proposed plan as it relates to the rezone. Please keep in mind that the conceptual P.U.D. plan could potentially become connected to the rezone, thereby imposing a limiting condition upon future development. The Planning and Public Works Departments should have sufficient time to review your conceptual P.U.D. plan prior to the hearing. I would ' suggest contacting Mike Smith of the Planning Department to coordinate your submittal of the plan and the hearing date. Respeotful , L. Rick Beeler Hearing Examiner cc: Planning Department CC _FLG _ r INTERNATIONAL March 29, 1978 Mr. L. Rick Beeler Land Use Hearing Examiner The City of Renton Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 RE: Rezone No. 129-78 Dear Mr. Beeler: Our March 24, 1978 letter is a request for reconsideration of certain portions of your March 14, 1978 findings and recommendation to the City Council based on "error in judgment" per Section 4-3015, Title IV, Ordinance No. 1628, Code of General Ordinance. Again, thank you for your consideration. • Sincerely,PHCInternational , Inc. Paul S. :erg-r Director of Technical Services PSB:dak RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER MAR 311978 AM pd 71819140111112aiMI4i5/6 ONE WASHINGTON PLAZA • TACOMA, WASHINGTON 98402 • (206) 383-3484 _FL CG INTERNATIONAL March 24, 1978 RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER Mr. L. Rick Beeler MAR 2 71978 PM Land Use Hearing Examiner • AM The City of Renton 7,819"111121112I314'5,6 Municipal Building 41 200 Mill Ave. S. Renton, Wash. 98055 RE: Renton File No. R-129-78 Dear Mr. Beeler: • - I believe that we ahve expressed our concern for the proper utilization of the land being considered for rezoning. It is because of this and our need to consider the economic feasibility of this project that we forward the following comments. It is our hope that you will consider them prior to finalizing your presentation to the City Council . We have taken a plan of the site and marked off the areas corresponding to the present recommendations to determine the available density. Apply- ing the rules established by Renton PUD Ordance No. 3051, confirmed by consultation with the Renton Planning Department, we have established that, site conditions allowing, the maximum number of units we can put on the site would be about 430. Not only is this considerably less than the 582 units anticipated in the report. but also much less than our pro- jected requirement of 528 units, in order to keep these units in the mid- dle-income market. Furthermore, the 430 units is based on 30 units per acre in the R-3 zones, whereas our objective had been an overall den- sity closer to 16 units per residential acre. Parcel B: Considering the nature of this land, the Comprehensive Plan's designation for high density multi-family and the amount of area affected, we feel that too large a portion of this parcel is being allowed to be affected by the 3 single family homes which have been designated' to be. left on the site. By the last comment in the "Re- commendations on page 10, you expressed the same opinion. We would like the chance to present our ideas, in a PUD Submittal , incorporating these homes into the overall plan. Perhaps from this standpoint it would not be ne- cessary to rezone those particular parcels at this time. It should be pointed out that the writer had personally contacted the three owners concerning this development and no objections were made. ONE WASHINGTON PLAZA • TACOMA, WASHINGTON 98402 • (206) 383-3484 Page-2 , ' .Stati scal ly,_ there is 23.`3 acres in Parcel B of this 11.3 -acres has been recommended for R-3, leaving .12c0 acres for. R-2. The portion in question 'is centrally located and amounts to approximately: 5.5 acres, or- a quarter of the ' . total, area: This is illustrated on-the attached marked up site drawing. ; Parcel C: While we- agree, that a portion .of this parcel's topography lends itself to special consideration we think that a cer • - tain,•portion of it is ''atuned with.the adjacent .l and in '- ' Parcel B. This portion'we suggest be allowed to be re- • zoned,-R73: in .conformance with the Comprehensive Plan. . The . remaining area' would 'be divided :between. the Westerly 700 , ft. of open space and a buffer R-2 zone. This is illus- 'trated on' the.;attached, marked..up.-si to,plan. Again, we . ' •;ask ,for 'a- chance' to present our;'ideas',for..a tastefully . designed 'development i , :PUD submittal . Thank you for your consideration: I would be-more than pleased to dis- cuss, all or any, portions of this project with you personally., S rely;' , • . 11X4 1 ' • . Paul S. :erg-r • Director Technical Services ' • , • PSB:gl a. .. copies: Earlington Woods File - . Randy Blair, Wilsey &,Ham : , ' . . enclosures ' • . 4 OF R v 0 • OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY• RENTON,WASHINGTON 0 0 POST OFFICE BOX 626, 106 2nd AVENUE BUILDING • RENTON,WASHINGTON 98055 255-0678 � ti p �Q` GERARD M.SHELLAN,CITY ATTORNEY LAWRENCE J.WARREN, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY 414TEOSEP1�.0 March 24 , 1978 Mr. L. Rick Beeler Hearing Examiner City of Renton Renton City Hall Renton, WA 98055• ' Re: Rezone Application No. 129-78 C.H.G. International Dear Rick : I have your memo of March 17 , 1978 regarding the above- mentioned rezone application, . addressed to Larry for reply. I have reviewed the Report and Recommendation to the Renton City Council as well as your preliminary draft of restrictive covenants and I find no problems with them. If you have specific questions , please advise. V r _ yours , / Danie ellogg DK/bjm RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER • 1AR291978 AM PM 7t8t9ROella12!I M.31464 MEMORANDUM TO . ,Larry rren, City Attorney DATE 3-17-78 FROM ck Beeler, Hearing Examiner SUBJECT Rezone Application No. 129-78; C.H.G. International You should be in receipt of my decision regarding this application which was transmitted on March 14, 1978. Attached is a preliminary draft of the restrictive covenants for your review prior to submittal to the applicant for signature. These covenants are unusually complex in response to a complex application. Your response is needed as soon as possible in order to provide the applicant with reasonable time to review the covenants during the 14-day appeal period. Thank you. • MEMORANDUM TO Don .Monaghan, Office Engineer, Public Works Department DATE 3-15-78 FROM Marilyn Petersen, Land Use Hearing Examiner Department SUBJECT Attached Legal Description for C.H.G. International Rezone. R-129-78 In order to prepare restrictive covenants for the subject rezone application, I will require verification of the attached legal description as soon as possible. Thank you, c/ `%'Et-wi ,f iG .��-CAL-y✓ Marilyndetersen ti INTEROFFICE CORRESPONDENCE Date March 16, 1978 TO: Marilyn' Petersen, Land Use Hearing Examiner Dept. FROM: Richard C. Houghton, Engineering Supervisor SUBJECT: ' CHG International Rezone R129-78 We have checked the legal description contained with the attached paperwork relative to the above referenced rezone and find it to be satisfactory except for a minor exclusion within Parcel "B". The last paragraph on page one, pertaining to Block 8 within the Plat of Earlington should be corrected to read as follows: Also that portion of Lots 9 and 10 together with one-half of the vacated alley adjacent, lying south of the south line of Primary State Highway No. 2; and lots 11, 12 and 13 together with one-half of the vacated alley adjacent, all in Block 8. AH:pmp ,Third Report _�..4 ecember 19, 1977 ',:� :r1:0�1/n a LllEIi .. A JAN 23 78 Order No. . 637008 1 DESCRIPTION: \,\r .- =JL - p2 • PARCEL "A" `'�',,ii '(� That portion of Government Lots 13 and 14 in Section 18, Township 23 North, Range. 5 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington, AND of Tract 3, Supplemental Map of Renton Shore Lands on file in . the--office of the Commissioner of Public Lands at Olympia, Washington, AND of vacated Maple Street (formerly Rainier Boulevard) as shown on the Plat of Earlington, as per plat recorded in Volume 14 of Plats on page 7, • records of King County, Washington, described as follows: • . . Beginning at the intersection of the East margin of Said Maple Street, as now established, with the North boundary of the Pacific Coast Railraod Company's right-of-way; • . thence North 17°19 ' 44" East along said East margin 231. 10 feet to the true point of beginning; thence North 77°18' 45" East 820.14 feet to the East line of said Tract 3; thence Southeasterly along said East line 293. 54 feet to the North boundary of said railway right-of-way; thence Westerly along said right-of-way line 917. 22 feet to the production Southerly of the Easterly line of Lot 1 in Block 16, in i said Plat of Earlington; , thence North 24°14' 48" West along said production and along said East line and along the Northerly production of said East line 153.26 feet to said East line of Maple Street, as now established; '.hence North 17°19' 44" East ,90. 31 feet to the true point of beginning; : LSO that portion of said Government Lot 14 AND of said Tract 3; vying Northerly of the above-described parcel, lying Easterly of said last margin of Maple Street and lying Southerly of a line extending cue East from the. Southeast corner of Lot 28 in Block 10, said Plat of Earlington; IOTE: The bearings hereon refer to the meridian. of the Lambert Plane ! ? rojection for the State of Washington, North Zone and are equated _ °26 ' 15" clockwise to the, bearings used in the description of thi? ~ roperty conveyed to Robert L. Edwards by .deed recorded under I.iditor's File No. 5726111. P aICEL "B" Tie following lots in Earlington, as per plat recorded in Volume 14 of Plats on page 7, records of King County, Washington: Ziat portion of Lots 22, 23, 24, 26, 27 and 28 lying South of the South line of Primary State Highway No. 2 as conveyed to the State of Washington by deeds recorded under Auditor's File No's. 2538823, 2 537'568. and+2534519; ' •••• . ALL in Block 7; ALSO that portion of Lots 9 and 10 lying South 'of the South line of 4r- Primary State Highway No. 2; AND Lots' 11, 12 and 13, ALL in Block 8; o - -continued- ' -- ii 4.-. 19, l9 /7 Qr, No. 637008 ( - , _ascription - continued . ALSO that portion of Lots 3, 4 and 5 described as follows: Beginning at a point on. the Southerly line of said Block 9, 158.00 feet Northeasterly of the Southwest corner of Lot 7 in said Block 9; thence at right angles to said Southerly line 88.36' feet mote--or-less . to the Northerly line of said Block ,9; thence Northeasterly along said Northerly line of said Block 9, 66.00 feet more or less to a point 92. 00 feet Southwesterly of the North- easterly corner of Lot 2 in said Block 9; 1 thence Southeasterly 88.36 feet to a point on the Southerly line of said Block 9, 1. 73 feet Southwesterly of the Southeasterly corner ' of Lot 3 in said Block 9; thence Southwesterly along the Southerly line of said Block 9, 66.62 feet to the point of beginning; ALL in Block 9; ' ALSO, Lots 3 through 27, inclusive, AND the Southwesterly 10 feet of Lot 2 adjoining, , EXCEPT that portion thereof conveyed to King County for street purposes by deed recorded under King County Recording No: 766800; ALL in Block 10; i ALSO Lots 1 through 24, inclusive; ALL in Block 114 ALSO Lots 1 through 7, inclusive, and Lots 15 through 28, inclusive; ALL in flock 12; ) ALSO Lots 15 through 24, inclusive, EXCEPT .t'iat portion of Lots 19 and 20 conveyed to the State of Washington for State Road No. 2 (Sunset Boulevard. West) by deed recorded under King County Recording No. 2545569;, AND EXCE" P that portion of Lots 15, 16, 17, 18, 21, 22, 23 and 24 conveyed to the State of Washington for State Road No. 2 (Sunset Boulevar( West) by deed recorded under King County Recording No. 2594162; AND Lots 25 through 28, inclusive; ALL in Block 13; ALSO Lot; 1 through 7,, inclusive, and Lots 24 through 28, inclusive; ALL in E•] ock. 14; . ALSO, Lcts 1 through 24, inclusive, AND Lots 27 and 28; ALL .in - Block 15; ALSO, Let ; 1 and 3, EXCEPT pc -tions conveyed to King County for street purposes by deed recorded ender King County Recording No. 766800; Lots 4 through 10, inclusive , AND Lot 12; ALL in Block 16; . . ALSO, Lots 1 through 14, inclusive, ALL in Block 17; ALSO, Lct3 1 through 4, inclusive; ALL in Block 18. PARCEL "( _ , S . .o • Those poi :ions of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4; AND of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4; AND of the Southeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 13, Township 23 North, Range 4 ,East, W.M. , in King County, Washington, bounded on the Southwesterly side by the ' -continued- _ ) _.... _ �__-.._._.___-___ -_. . .._____ •-�_.__ _ ... ._ 4 _. ___. . , Report Amber 19, 1977 Order No. 637008 Description - continued i Northerly boundary line of the 100 foot wide right-of-way of the • Pacific Coast Railroad Company, on the Easterly side by the Westerly boundary of the plat of EarlingtoA, as per plat recorded in Volume 14 of Plats on page 7, records of King County, Washington, and on the Northerly side by a line drawn from the Northwesterly corner of Lot 15, in Block 13, of said plat of Earlington and running thence Westerly a distance of 1250 feet to a point on the Northerly' line of said Pacific Coast Railroad Company right-of-way, said point being at right angles to the centerline of the main tracks of the Pacific Coast Railroad Company at a point therein distant about 2050 feet Westerly measured along the centerline of the main track of the . Pacific Coast Railroad Company as now located along said right-of-way . from the intersection of said centerline with the East line of said Section 13; ' EXCEPT right-of-way for Primary State Highway No. 2 (Sunset Boulevard West) conveyed to_. the State of Washington by deed' recorded under , R King County No. 2594162. ALL Situate in the County of King, State of Washington. ' '6 fir • :cg, ki..: a.: if e • ,.,.5.i.:1.) . .:, • • • 1 i 11 • 1 • � .. 1 • , .• ` • 0 .,.� , MEMORANDUM TO: Rick Baler, Hearing Examiner March 12 , 1978 FROM: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Re: CHG International Rezone Application Dear Rick: In response to your Memorandum to me concerning the above captioned topic, I have the following comments: 1. The Hearing Examiner can consider only those items presented to him and not other parcels of land not subject to the hearing. It is my understanding of the law that no jurisdiction over other property would be involved. 2 . Spot zoning is a recognized legal theory when property is being changed in zoning, but not when it is being allowed to remain the same. 3. If there is a problem with property not being rezoned or property around it is being rezoned, and it is apparent that this property should be rezoned, then this topic should be referred to the Planning Department for action on behalf of the City. 4 . Ilnow of no case law on this particular subject matter in the State of Washington, but believe our Ordinance system would require that any rezone application be generated by the City and thereafter considered by the Hearing Examiner. However, the Hearing Examiner could impose restrictions on the rezone application to make sure that the impact on particular properties would not be excessive. If I can be of any further assistance to you, please feel free to contact me. Lawrence J. Arren RECEIVEi LJW:nd CITY OF RENTON NEARING EXAMINER cc: . Mayor ItAR 131978 Council President MOPM Del Mead 1 . 4. 0V Re� .► o THE CITY OF RENTON `I Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 z o op �. CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER '0 �Q- L. RICK BEELER . 235-2593 O4) ED SEP1t�O March 3, 1978 . TO: Larry Warren, City Attorney FROM: . L. Rick Beeler, Hearing Examiner SUBJECT: Spot Zoning relative to C.H.G. International Rezone Application, R-129-78 • The attached map, extracted from the Planning Department's staff report (Exhibit #1) , shows the proposed rezone and the properties that.are not involved. At the southerly approximate center of Parcel B are located three separate single family residences that are not a part of the application. In the public hearing, . the applicant stated that purchase of these lots was not intended. These lots would become islands within the proposed R-3 multiple family development. It appears that this situation constitutes spot zoning in reverse if only the proposed application .is considered and acted upon. In this case the area surrounding islands of property would be rezoned to a more intense use for the exclusive benefit Of the applicant without showing of 'benefit to the public as a whole. Therefore, it appears that further action is necessary, e.g. , rezoning of the three individual lots at the same time as the application or providing appropriate transition surrounding the three lots. No application has been .filed for rezoning of these three lots to my knowledge. Therefore, I am prevented from initiating any kind of action. But the City Council can initiate the action if it•desires. My only action could be to recommend rezoning Parcel B to R-3 (if that is my final recommendation) subject to rezoning the three individual lots to R-3 as well. • In your opinion do you agree that spOt zoning would occur in this proposal? And if so, what course of action should I take to prevent implications of spot zoning? 7 My recommendation is due March 14, 1978 so your response would be needed and appreciated by March .8, 1978 if at all possible. • Si. ely, 10,4 ll • . •ick Beeler Hearing Examiner . Att.achiner t AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING • State of Washington) County of King Marilyn J. Petersen , being first duly sworn, upon oath disposes and states: That on the 14th day of March , 19 78 , affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below-entitled application or petition. • / Z-4(4.4,7,47 Subscribed and sworn this ItA- day of \M-c,. 1914, Notary Public in and for the'$tdvIll,�l of Washington, residing at Ret on , r Application, Petition or Case: C.H.G. International, R-129-78 f ' \� (The m%nutea contain a .eiAt 4 .the pa tiea ot6 /cecokd) .► o THE CITY OF RENTON U 0 7. MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 z o p CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 'O �Q- L. RICK BEELER , 235-2593 0 4TED SEP-1 March 22, 1978 Members, Renton City Council Renton, Washington RE: File No. R-129-78; C.H.G. International Dear Council Members: Attached is the Examiner's Report and Recommendation on the referenced rezone request, dated March14, 1978. The appeal period for the application expires on March 28, 1978, and the report is being forwarded to you for review by the Planning and Development Committee following the seven-day period from the date of publication. The complete file will be transmitted to the City Clerk on March 29, 1978 and will be placed on the Council agenda on April 10, 1978. If you require additional assistance or information regarding this matter, please contact the undersigned. Sinc- -1 04040 a d 11N,Ir� ..... , .. , ►'''r'�+�r"sr , L. •ick :eeler Hearing Examiner cc: Planning Department City Clerk Attachment - AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING State of Washington) County of King Marilyn J. Petersen , being first duly sworn, upon oath disposes and states: That on the 14th day of March , 19 78 , affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below-entitled application or petition. Subscribed and sworn this \tl day of \Aa-T,1„ 19-1 ‘ .()v4' i\r\ \\\LW Notary Public in and for the =State of Washington, residing at Renton Application, Petition or Case: C.H.G. International, R-129-78 (The ►ninwtea contain a £L t o the pantLa of tecotd) . SP-050-80 Page Two Blaylock advised ownership by the applicant. The Examiner requested Mr. Blaylock to specify the number of parking spaces proposed in each lot. These were delineated as follows: lot 1 - 18 spaces; lot 2 - 50 spaces; lot 3 - 10 spaces; strip between lots 2 and 3 from N. 4th Street to N. 5th Street - 20 spaces , although the Planning Department determined that ,the spaces are not acceptable in view of fire lane requirements; lot 4 - 17 spaces; lot 5 - .71 spaces; 'and lot 6 - 48 spaces, reduced from 54 through redesign of. the lot. The spaces contained in each lot as proposed total 282 stalls; however, Mr. Blaylock advised that deletion of lot 2 and the 20-foot strip from the proposal would create a total of 212 parking spaces, and if lot 2 were included but the 20-foot strip restricted to 10 parking spaces, a total of 272 parking stalls would be provided which meets the city's requirement. The Examiner requested clarification of a denotion on Exhibit #2 indicating an existing school access on the south side of N. 5th Street. Mr. Blaylock advised that the school property is a separate parcel from the adjacent 20-foot strip. The Examiner inquired if the halfway house and Circus-Circus facility can provide sufficient off street parking to meet city requirements. Mr. Blaylock indicated that these uses may be illegal since adequate parking space would not be available. The Examiner requested testimony by the applicant. Responding was: Steven Crane 350 Grand Central in the Park Building Seattle, WA 98104 Mr. Crane, legal counsel for the applicant, referenced Section D.6 of the Planning Department report, and concurring testimony by Mr. Blaylock which indicated the removal of city shop equipment from lot 5, and advised that to date removal of the heavy shop equipment has not occurred. He refuted the Planning Department statement that approval of a number of scattered parking lots would result in premature decay of an established neighborhood which would create blight requiring possible public funds to renovate; and stated that the area in question is deeply into a state of transition, is partially. utilized for unsightly storage of city shops equipment, and is located on a major arterial which is not consistent with a quiet, single family residential use. Mr. Crane also emphasized that a declaration of environmental non-significance has been issued for the subject proposal , and comments indicated that the proposed action would have only moderate effect on the environment. Mr. Crane referenced Section L.3 of the Planning Department report, which discusses the definition of the word "auxiliary," and felt that the information is irrelevant to the subject application. He also objected to reference to the 20-foot strip between lots 2 and 3 as an "alleyway," since no evidence exists that it has ever served in that capacity, and the term gives significance to the requirement for a fire lane. Referencing previous discussion regarding access to the school property, Mr. Crane indicated that a cyclone fence exists which would prevent access from a fire lane to that property, and a more reasonable approach for emergency access would be to provide it on the eastern side of the school property. He objected to requiring a property owner to install a fire lane through private property, and suggested the possibility that the city exercise its power of eminent domain in condemning the property for such use if proof exists that it would serve a public purpose. Mr. Crane discussed the function of the 20-foot strip as a privately owned parcel connecting lots 2 and 3, and not as a public alleyway. He also pointed out that substantial progress has occurred towards completion of the building, and severe economic hardship would occur if the plans are not approved. The Examiner advised that because the applicant had created his own hardship by revision of plans after submission and approval by the city, it would not be a consideration in this matter. Mr. Crane referenced the Planning Department comment contained in Section L.5 that the proposal suggests an unusual method of providing parking for the principal use, and noted that although the applicant would have preferred providing parking facilities in a contiguous lot, it was not possible, and he should not be penalized for the proposal as currently submitted. To support his argument that no residential zoning exists in proximity to the area, he discussed property designations on the Comprehensive Plan for the area, noting that although a few older residences remain, they will probably be phased out in future years. Although Mr. Crane concurred with the recommendation to approve parking lots 3 and 5 as submitted, and parking lots 4 and 6 as revised, he objected to the condition for execution of restrictive covenants to run with the land to assure utilization of lot 3 for parking in perpetuity. He suggested an alternative for attachment of a condition to the occupancy or building permit to state that if ever during occupancy of the office building the off-site parking is converted to a different use, the permit becomes void. The Examiner responded that such a condition would be difficult to enforce since the alternative would require closing down a large office building. July 16, 1980 OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION, APPLICANT: Fifth and Park Place Company FILE NO. SP-050-80 LOCATION: 400, 430, 533 & 601 Park Avenue N. and 538 Pelly Avenue N. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant seeks approval of .a special permit to allow use of several properties for off-site parking lots to serve ;an office 'building on Park Avenue N. ' SUMMARY OF ACTION: Planning Department Recommendation: Approval with restrictive covenants. Hearing Examiner Decision: Denial . PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning, Department preliminary report was received by the REPORT: Examiner on July 3, 1980. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on July 8, 1980 at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers of• the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. ' • It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and the applicant had received and reviewed the Planning Department preliminary report. Roger Blaylock, Associate Planner, reviewed the report and entered the following exhibits into the record: Exhibit #l : Application File containing Planning Department report and other pertinent documents Exhibit #2: Site Plan with staff comments (2 sheets) Mr. Blaylock added a recreational designation to Section B.9 (Comprehensive Land Use Plan Designation of the Subject Sites) of the report. He. also added reference to the Parking and Loading Ordinance, Chapter 22, to Section H. (Applicable Sections- of the Comprehensive Plan or other official city documents) . The Examiner corrected Section L.3, Line 6, which refers to provision of parking lots on a commercial basis, and should be changed to non- commercial basis. Also corrected was Section L.4 which states that an alley exists between parking lots 2 and 3, but due to clarification that the 20-foot strip of property is not an alley and is defined as a privately owned parcel , the notation should be corrected. The Examiner inquired regarding the ownership of parking lot 4, or Tract C. The applicant advised that the lot is owned by Dobson Building Company and leased by the applicant: Referencing Section L.4 of the report, which indicates that vacated alley now owned by TR, Inc. connects lots 2 and 3, the Examiner inquired if the ownership as denoted is correct, and the applicant should respond to theinquiry during subsequent testimony. The Examiner inquired regarding the status of the alley which runs east and west between Park Avenue N. and Pelly Avenue N. located south of lot 5. Mr. Blaylock indicated that the strip is an established alley. Responding to the Examiner 's further inquiry regarding the status of the strip which runs north and south to N. 5th Street from just south of lot 5 and behind lot 4, Mr. Blaylock indicated that the strip is also a public alley. Mr. Blaylock also noted that the strip of property lying east of lot 3 is vacated, privately owned property, and because of the residential use of property located north of the. parking lot, a five-foot buffer or screening fence must be provided to the east and south of these residences to separate land uses, which would eliminate all of the parking area behind the homes. • Mr. Blaylock 'indicated the requirement to provide either a fire lane in the 20-foot strip which would eliminate all parking, or provide a fire lane around the Circus-Circus Fabricating plant which would eliminate 10 of. 20 proposed parking spaces. Mr. .Blaylock corrected Section L.6 which states that landscaping plans have not been received; and advised recent receipt of required plans. Responding to the Examiner's inquiry regarding ownership of lot 1 adjacent to the subject office building, Mr. SP-050-80 Page Four Mr. Ewing, engineer for the applicant, suggested that the Boeing Company, as lessee of the office building, assume the responsibility for assignment of parking spaces. He indicated concurrence in the Planning Department recommendations for approval of lots 3, 4, 5 and 6 with certain modifications, and advised that landscaping plans had been submitted and approved by the city. Referencing discussion regarding the 20-foot strip, Mr. Ewing advised that a quarter-section drawing for the property would indicate that the 20-foot strip was never an alley but was part of platted lots designated as the westerly 20 feet of the easterly lot, and the proposal to utilize the property for parallel parking should be approved. He indicated concurrence in the Planning Department proposal to reduce the number of spaces to 10 to allow certain modifications for access to the Circus-Circus facility if utilization of Lot 2 with contiguous ownership is allowed in arriving at the total 272 parking spaces required. Mr. Ewing indicated concurrence in Condition No. M.4 requiring improvement of the alley north of parking lot 3 to N. 5th Street, but objected to Condition No. M.5 requiring construction of a fence on the south side of lot 3 to screen the halfway house, because of the use of the property for a licensed business. He noted that if the grass on the east side of the halfway house were removed, sufficient on-site parking could be provided for that business. Mr. Ewing also objected to the recommendation of the Fire Department to pave the alley south of lot 4 to N. 5th Street, since exits of the lots will be designed in an east-west direction to Pelly Avenue N. and Park Avenue N. , and access is not proposed southerly on the alley to N. 5th Street . The Examiner requested further testimony in support. Responding was: Robert Yakas Boeing Commercial Airplane Company P.O. Box 3707, M.S. 62-50 ' Seattle, WA 98127 Mr. Yakas was affirmed by the Examiner. He advised concurrence of the Boeing Company, . as lessee of the proposed office building, to accept responsibility for assignment of parking spaces. (Following closure of the hearing, Mr. Yakas advised, that assignment of spaces by the company would not be possible.) The Examiner requested testimony in opposition to the application. Responding was: William Plant 531 Pelly Avenue N. Renton, WA 98055 Mr. Plant was affirmed by the Examiner. He advised the location of his property on the west side of Pelly Avenue N. , and indicated concern regarding increase of already existing traffic and parking congestion in the vicinity of his residence. If the proposal is approved, Mr. Plant requested the city's assistance in alleviating traffic problems if they occur in the future. The Examiner requested testimony by city staff. Responding was: Lieutenant Donald Persson Renton Police Department Lt. Persson indicated concern that occupancy of the subject office building will initiate increased on-street parking on Pelly Avenue N. and Park Avenue N. for employees seeking . the convenience of parking closer to the business use without utilizing parking lots. He explained the recommendation of the Police Department for paving of the alley which extends south from lot 5 to N. 5th Street because of anticipation that it will be utilized as a short cut from parking lots 4 and 5, and because it is very narrow and in a state of disrepair. To preclude blocking of the alley, Lt. Persson suggested restricting and signing it for no parking. Regarding the proposed fire lane behind the Circus-Circus facility, he indicated a concern for emergency access into the proposed parking lots as well as the business. He shared concerns of residents on Pelly Avenue N. regarding parking and traffic congestion, and advised that additional manpower to adequately enforce parking regulations in that area is not proposed in the future. The Examiner requested further testimony by city staff. Responding was: Jim Matthew, Battalion Chief Renton Fire Department Mr. Matthew was affirmed by the Examiner. Referencing concerns regarding the fire lane behind the Circus-Circus facility, he cited city Ordinance No. 3312 which gives the Fire Chief the authority to enforce fire lanes for existing buildings. He advised that the dimensions of the lane require a width of 12 feet and a vertical clearance of 13 feet, 6 inches as well as adequate turning radius for ingress and egress . Mr. Matthew indicated that to ensure adequate access , the alley between lots 4 and 5 should be SP-050-80 Page Three Responding to Mr. Crane's objection regarding the definition of the 20-foot strip as an "alleyway," the Examiner confirmed that the city recognizes that the property is not an alleyway, but at the same time, the strip would be required to be improved, paved and striped as a condition of approval . Mr. Crane felt that the issue of whether the property in question is part of lots 2 and 3 would determine whether parking is allowed in that location or not. The Examiner advised that the public prescriptive right for use of the 20-foot strip is not an issue for discussion at the hearing, but should be determined by the City Attorney. Referencing Section M.5 regarding provision of a fence on the south side of parking lot 3 adjacent to the state licensed halfway house, Mr. Crane objected to the condition since a newly constructed office building to the north of lot 3 had not been required to provide similar fencing. The Examiner advised that the condition is contained in the Parking and Loading Ordinance to screen office use from residentially used property. Referencing previous discussion regarding access to the school property and the requirement for a fire lane, Mr. Blaylock advised that school access was not the justification for the lane, but it was required to allow access to the Circus-Circus facility in conformance with fire code regulations. The Examiner requested further testimony in support of the application. Responding was: Eugene Horbach 550 S.W. 7th Street Renton, WA 98055 Mr. Horbach, owner of the office building, reviewed. history of development of the site, and advised that commencement of construction of the building occurred in August of 1979 with plans for a three story building with parking on the ground floor,. However, upon realization of an insufficiency of parking stalls, additional land was acquired through purchase and lease. He noted that in November, 1979, he entered into a lease agreement with the Dobson Building Company for lease of lots 2, 3 and 4 plus the 20-foot strip along the property line from 5th Avenue N. to 4th Avenue N. Mr. Horbach advised that the lessee would have the first right of refusal upon expiration, and an option for purchase. The other parking facilities, lots 1 , 5 and 6 have been purchased,, and lot 5, proposed to be vacated by the city, contains heavy equipment, trucks and old cars. He questioned the requirements of the code which pertain to approval by the Hearing Examiner of off-site parking fo'r the office building. The Examiner advised that the, Parking and Loading Ordinance requires that when the parking lots are not part of the principal use, that arrangements for use must appear to be permanent, and the Hearing Examiner must determine whether or not a 10-year lease would sufficiently meet the intent of those requirements. He then inquired regarding the expected life of the building. Mr. Horbach anticipated a period of 50 years, but reiterated previous comments regarding lease renewal and purchase options. Following affirmation by the Hearing Examiner, David Clemens, Senior Planner, testified that the five-year lease requirement is found in Section 4-2204.6. of the Parking and Loading Ordinance in discussing joint use of parking facilities. He noted, however, that the proposal is not categorized as a joint use but a totally separate use 'by the applicant. The Examiner clarified that Section 4-2209 of the Parking and Loading Ordinance states that where off-street parking is required, except for single family dwellings, a plan approved by the Planning and Traffic Engineering Departments shall_ be furnished to the Building Department accompanied by sufficient proof of ownership, lease or other arrangement that indicates the spaces contemplated will be permanent. He advised that a 10-year lease would not indicate a permanent arrangement since the expected life of the building extends to at least 50 years. He also clarified that the Parking and Loading Ordinance requires that parking lots be located within 500 feet of the building, not the use, they serve, and the decision of whether the 20-foot strip is part of parking lot 2 would have no bearing on that requirement. Mr. Horbach repeated his contention .that because the two lots are connected by the 20-foot strip in one ownership, it represents a contiguous piece of property. The Examiner requested clarification that the alley north of lot 3, the north parcel on Park Avenue N. between N. 4th Street and N. 5th Street is no longer owned by TR, Inc. Mr. Horbach indicated that the ownership has been dissolved. To preclude congestion of traffic caused by circling of vehicles from one lot to another, the Examiner inquired if the possibility exists to assign parking spaces to either floors or suites contained in the building. Mr. Horbach responded affirmatively. The Examiner requested further testimony in support. Responding was: Jack Ewing 622 S. Central Kent, WA 98031 ' SP-05_ _0 Page Six 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , R.C.W. 43.21 .C. , as amended, a Declaration of Non-Significance has been issued for the subject proposal by the Environmental Review Committee, responsible official . 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the impact of this development. • 5. The principal use, an office building, is located at 500 Park Avenue N. between N. 5th Street and N. 6th Street. The office building is under construction. (See map.) 6. As originally proposed and approved, the office building would have contained approximately 36,000 square feet of floor space. A building containing 36,000 square feet of floor space requires 180 parking spaces (Section 4-2208.2(B)) . The applicant originally proposed providing the required parking on the first level of the structure and in an additional parking area adjacent to the building. 7. The applicant has .since amended the building plans, without prior approval of the Building Department, to enclose the first level for additional office space. The total floor space as now proposed would be 54,000 square feet which requires 270 parking spaces . 8. The applicant has proposed to provide the required parking in a series of separate and/or connected lots within a four block area. The applicant proposes establishing these parking lots pursuant to Section 4-2204.3(C) , which provides for auxiliary parking, subject to special permit approval , Section 4-722(B) . 9. The applicant proposes providing the required parking stalls in a series of six lots and on property immediately surrounding the principal use. Forty-eight (48) parking spaces would be provided immediately adjacent to the principal use and on the same lot as the principal use. Eighteen (18) parking spaces would be provided on lot 1 adjacent to the principal use and located near the southeast corner of the principal use. This lot is in the same ownership as the principal use. Fifty (50) parking spaces would be provided by lot 2, a block south of the principal use on the corner of Park Avenue N. and N. 4th Street and about 550 feet from the principal use. This property has been leased. (Terms of the lease agreement appear below.) • Ten (10) parking stalls would be provided on lot 3, centrally located on the east side of Park between N. 4th Street and N. 5th Street. The lot is about 400 feet south of the principal use. The lot is also leased (see below) . Twenty (20) parking stalls would be provided in a north-south "alley-like" 20-foot wide strip, located between Park Avenue N. and Garden Avenue N. and running between lots 2 and 3 and continuing north about 230 feet to N. 5th Street. This strip is also covered by the lease. Seventeen (17) parking spaces would be provided by lot 4, located on the west side of Park Avenue N. at the northern end near N. 6th Street. This lot is across from the principal use and it is also covered by the lease agreement. Seventy-one (71) parking spaces would be provided on lot 5 which is located on the southeast corner of the intersection of N. 6th Street and Pelly Avenue N. The lot is owned by the owner of the principal use. This lot is located about 280 feet from the principal use. Forty-eight (48) parking stalls will be located on lot 6, located at the northwest corner of the intersection of Park Avenue N. and N. 6th Street. This lot is located about 235 feet from the principal use. The lot is also owned by the applicant. If each of the proposed parking areas is approved, the total number of parking stalls proposed would be 282. 10. The Comprehensive Plan designates the areas in which the parking lots are located as suitable for the development of business and commercial uses. 11 . The principal use and all parking areas except lot 1 are located on property zoned B-1 (Bus'iness/Commercial ) . Lot 1 is zoned L-1 (Light Industry) . SP-050 Page Five maintained clear at all times, and parking restricted. The Examiner requested additional testimony by the Public Works Director. Responding was: Warren C. Gonnason. Public Works Director Mr. Gonnason responded to concerns of existing residents in the area regarding potential parking problems created by the addition of parking lots. He advised his opinion that the area will be minimally impacted since the parking lots will provide parking for the increased demand and should alleviate the congestion currently occurring. on the streets. However, he agreed that if evidence of a greater demand for parking in the area due to other uses occurs, the city will regulate time limits or restrict parking in certain areas to facilitate. the traffic process.. The Examiner requested additional testimony in opposition to the application. Responding was: Louise Monohan 6814 S.E. 32nd Street Mercer Island, WA 98040 Ms . Monohan, owner of two lots located south of lot 5 and west of lot 4; indicated concern over the past years regarding traffic congestion. She noted that one of the lots' contains a rental residence, and tenants with small children have indicated intent to move because of traffic safety factors which will be further impaired if the proposal is approved. She also indicated concern regarding an existing drainage problem onto her lots from the proposed parking lots. The Examiner requested further testimony in rebuttal . Mr. Crane summarized' previous comments regarding evidence of intent of permanency in lease agreements and available. mechanisms for enforcement in the regulatory processes of the city. Regarding concern of neighbors of increased drainage problems, he indicated that a drainage plan would be implemented which would improve the existing situation. Regarding the concern of the Planning Department that approval of the proposal would encourage blight in the neighborhood, Mr. Crane advised that visual appearance of one of the lots currently used as a storage yard for equipment and old cars would be greatly improved by the proposed use. Regarding concern with traffic congestion, he stated that the projected increase was not found to be significant in SEPA review, and parking could be monitored through time limits. Regarding concerns of the Fire Department for access, Mr. Crane advised that the maximum distance from the eastern edge of Park Avenue N. to the 20-foot strip is '125 feet, and access would be possible on the strip because parallel parking is proposed. The Examiner inquired regarding the penalties which would result from forfeiture of the leases. Mr. Horbach responded that although no sums are denoted, in. dealing with the lessor he. felt sure that conformance with the duration of the lease would occur, and the monthly payments are substantial . Mr. Crane advised that in view of the nationally noted, aggressive car pooling program initiated by the Boeing Company along with the rising cost of gasoline, impact from generation of traffic may be substantially less than anticipated. The Examiner requested final comments from the Planning Department staff. Mr. Blaylock indicated willingness to coordinate and develop a study regarding actual parking needs and uses with the Boeing 'Company representatives for use in reviewing future ordinance revisions. Referencing previous discussion regarding use of the halfway house located on Park Avenue N. , Mr. Blaylock advised that although a business license is required for that facility as well as all apartment buildings, the land use remains residential , and the requirement for fencing would still be applicable as noted in Condition No. 5 of the report. The Examiner requested further comments. Since there were none, the hearing regarding File No. SP-050-80 was closed by the Examiner at 10:50 a.m. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1 . The request is for approval of a special permit to allow the development of. five auxiliary parking lots to serve the principal use, an office building. 2. The application file containing the application, SEPA documentation, the Planning Department report, and other pertinent documents was entered into the record as Exhibit #1 . SP-050-80 Page Eight 2 . The proposed use of the 20-foot wide strip running between N. 4th and N. 5th Street will not provide the necessary fire lane access as required by the Fire Department. Since nine feet of the width of the strip is required for parking, only 11 feet will remain for access purposes, and the Fire Department has determined that this amount of space is inadequate. In addition, if the nine feet is utilized for parking, approximately 11 feet will be left for the use of vehicles traveling the length of the alley, consisting of two 200-foot long segments, for access to the various stalls and for the use of pedestrians entering or leaving the strip for access to or from their automobiles. Such a situation will lead to confrontations between pedestrians and vehicles. The additional requirement that five feet of landscaping be provided between parking lots and residential uses (Section 4-2204.8(B) (1)) would effectively eliminate parking both north and south of lot 3 because of the residential uses adjacent to the strip. • Therefore, subject to the conditions and constraints required by both the Parking and Loading Ordinance and the Fire Department, and the concerns for the health, safety and welfare of the general public both concerning fire danger and pedestrian safety, the 20-foot strip should not be used for auxiliary parking. 3. Parking lot 2 is greater than 500 feet from the building it is intended to serve. Sections 4-2204.3(C) (a) and 4-2204.9(A) require that the parking lot be within 500 walking feet of the building it serves; therefore, parking lot 2 cannot serve as auxiliary parking for the principal use. The applicant argues that parking lot 2 is an extension of parking, lot 3 by reason of the twenty-foot strip which connects them. First , the conclusion that the 20-foot strip cannot serve as parking as a .matter of the public health, safety and welfare eliminates that connection. Second, the connection between the two lots is too tenuous . Parking lot 2 and parking lot 3 are independent of each other. They are adjacent to a third area, the 20-foot wide "alley-like" strip, which the applicant had proposed to serve as parking. Therefore, under the circumstances described above, and for additional reasons indicated below, lot 2 is not an acceptable auxiliary parking lot. 4. The arrangement by which the applicant proposes acquiring the use of parking for 77 vehicles (not including the 20 spaces in the 20-foot strip similarly leased) does not meet the required permanency requirements spelled out by Section 4-2209. The 10-year lease does not approach the minimum 50 year useful life expectancy of the principal use. The lease is subject to recision (voluntary cancellation)_ at any time by agreement of the applicant and his lessor, by forfeiture by, the applicant, or by sale of the properties. ,At the same time, the area surrounding the principal use is in transition to more intense uses including newer commercial buildings not unlike the principal use, and also, multifamily residential buildings . As more of these properties convert to such uses, less land will be available for future negotiation for parking if the lease is terminated as it may be. The city would be hard pressed to close down an existing use because it suddenly was without sufficient parking. The fact that the city has the power to do so is not persuasive. Along the same lines, these leased lots, not being subject to covenants to require their commitment to serving the principal use, may also be converted to higher, greater income-producing uses . No matter what reason for termination of the lease or leases for one or all of the lots in the area in which the principal use is located, a replacement may be difficult if not impossible to locate. 5. The public health, safety and welfare will not be well served by the scattered arrangement of the proposed parking lots. Since assigned parking spaces have been generally ruled out, the public and both commercial and especially residential neighbors will have to endure a recurrent random search for available parking. With parking possibly available and possibly unavailable at any one time for any lot, automobiles will have to cruise between the various lots in an attempt to locate parking. Such searches will generate additional noise and air pollution in and around the principal use and in and around the existing residential uses. This will adversely affect the area, and in particular, properties adjacent to the various lots. The Police Department has also indicated that traffic flow will be impaired, by such a scattered system of parking lots, therefore, jeopardizing the public welfare. 6. Rather than confining the traffic, noise, light, glare and air pollution to the limited site and vicinity of the principal use, the scattered arrangement of the parking areas would permit the intrusion of such impacts into a wide area, impacting a greater number of residents and neighbors. Such an arrangement will not serve i SP-050-oo Page Seven 12. The other zoning districts surrounding the parking lots are, for the most part, either B-1 , L-1 (Light Industry) , or H-1 (Heavy Industry) . L-1 zoning is east of the principal use and H-i surrounds lot 6 on three sides. Lot 5 is located across Pelly Avenue N. from R-4 zoning (High Density Multifamily Residential) . 13. A number of the lots are located adjacent to less intense uses which still persist in the various zoning districts. Lot 6 is just east of Mothers Park. Residential uses face lot 5 across Pelly Avenue, and a residential use is just south across the alley. Lot 4 is just east of a residential use across an alley and immediately adjacent to a residential use to the south. Lot 3 is across Park Avenue from .a single family use and three more residential uses are just north of this parcel . Two residential lots are just north and a residential halfway house is located just south of lot 3. A residential lot is located just north across Park Avenue N. from lot 2. The proposed "alley-like" parking area located between Park Avenue'N. and , Garden Avenue N. between N. 4th Street and N. 5th Street is immediately adjacent to two residential uses and the halfway house. 14. The halfway house informally used part of lot 3 for off-street parking. The leasing of lot 3 to the applicant may cause the halfway house to become an illegal non- conforming use without adequate off-street parking. 15. The area is 'in transition from an older single family neighborhood to higher density residential and commercial uses. Much of the area, though, is still used 'for single family uses. Until recently, a single family home was located on lot 4. Lot 5 was the site of the City of Renton water shops. 16. The Fire Department has indicated that a 12-foot access lane must be provided in the north-south "alley-like" area between N. 4th Street and N. 5th Street. The width of required parking is nine feet (Sections 4-2206. 1 (A) and (B)) . 17. As a general rule, the Boeing Company, the lessee of the principal use, does not assign parking stalls. 18. Section 4-2204.3(C) requires that auxiliary, non-commercial parking provided for a principal use comply with the following requirements: a. Parking must be within 500 walking feet of the building it is intended to serve (distance is defined in Section 4-2204.3(A)) . b. The parking lot is subject to other ordinance requirements which would include landscaping, setbacks and screening, and dimensional requirements. c. Front yard setbacks not applicable in this case would apply. • d. Such lots are not permitted in areas zoned for single family and duplex dwellings. e. No automobile repair may be permitted on the site, except for emergencies. f. No charge other than monthly may be levied in a residential zone; and a special' permit approved by the Hearing Examiner is required. 19. Section 4-2209 requires that sufficient proof of permanency be submitted along with the application. 20. The lease agreement provides that the lots be leased for an initial period of ten years with an option to renew for a further five year period and a further option to purchase the lots if they are offered for sale. The lease also provides that. it is terminated if the property is sold to someone other than the applicant. 21 . The applicant indicated that the principal use has a useful life in excess of 50 years. CONCLUSIONS: 1 . In order for the Examiner to approve a special permit, there must be a finding that the proposal will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, will not adversely affect property in the vicinity, and will not injure neighboring property. Further, the intent of the Parking and Loading Ordinance as stated in Section 4-2201 .2 is to promote the public health, safety, welfare and aesthetics with a view towards enhancing the enjoyment and efficiency of the various land uses so that the value and usefulness of land uses will be maintained. SP-050-80 Page Ten errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk accompanying a filing fee of $25.00 and meeting other specified requirements . Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall , or same may be purchased at cost in said department. SF __O-80 Page Nine • the public use and interest and will adversely affect the public health, safety and welfare. 7. As long as the principal use is in existence (conservative estimates place the useful life of the building at 50 years) , these proposed lots or similarly located parcels will be dedicated to serve as the extensive parking system and will not enhance but rather detract from the value of adjoining properties and will lead to a continued blighting of a three or four block area of the city. Impairment of property values is in violation of the Comprehensive Plan. Scattered parking in and amongst residential uses is not effective control of land use and does not preserve and protect property values. 8. The numerous multiple parking lots will lead to further deterioration of the area rather than revitalization of the area whether the neighborhood is .commercial 'or . residential. The creation of numerous islands of parking will prevent the orderly redevelopment of the area and could well serve to preclude redevelopment because of the small islands of parking and the remaining small lots which themselves will be unable to find close-in parking for their own individual requirements. Such an arrangement would also set a poor precedent allowing numerous large office buildings to place small parking areas throughout commercial and residential neighborhoods. The precedent for such action should not be permitted because the impacts are too great. This area is just north of the central business district of the city, and will be subject to development pressures in the near future. The area will be desirable for residential living, it is close to areas of employment (the list of employers in the area is too numerous to recount) and recreation (Mothers Park, Liberty Park, Jones Park and the Cedar River Trail) , and desirable for further commercial uses as represented by the applicant 's proposal . As indicated above, the proposed scattered parking areas subject to" the scrutiny necessary for a special permit and to the scrutiny of the intent of the Parking and Loading Ordinance will adversely affect the public health, safety, welfare and aesthetics, and the special permit is therefore denied. DECISION: Denial . ORDERED THIS 16th day of July, 1980. \COL4^)r4L-...._ Fred J . Ka man• Land Use Hearing Examiner TRANSMITTED THIS 16th day of July, 1980 by Affidavit of Mailing to the parties of record: Steven Crane, 350 Grand Central in the Park Building, , Seattle, WA 98104 Eugene Horbach, 550 S.W. 7th Street, Renton, WA 98055 Jack Ewing, 622 S. Central , Kent, WA 98031 Robert Yakas, BCAC, P.O. Box 3707, M.S. 62-50, Seattle, WA 98127 William Plant, 531 Pelly Ave. N. , Renton, WA 98055 Louise Monohan, 6814 S.E. 32nd St. , Mercer Island, WA 98040 TRANSMITTED THIS 16th day of July, 1980 to the following: Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director Michael Porter, Planning Commission Chairman Ron Nelson, Building Division Supervisor • Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Donald Persson, Renton Police Department Jim Matthew, Renton Fire Department Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before July 30, 1980. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for revieWsby the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. Th"t,s request shall set forth the specific - . • • • . • . . • . , "'t 5- /KJ l' N • 1 ---- 1 " • • ,.. e , . . ,?•., I 7 .so 7 • . • :.' t • •" I I-G' . • ''• \ I - CIP/76.7 ,...,.....,-,-..• - . • I , I . . T. c)...; •0,..,.,,,,,i',irk,- -% " •% 1 (.:0,74,2 #Cp ..' jr ' ..t I 4r:41P."-CIVA,.7: ,,1?tk (0211."7/"C4•-...,Y.c.re. • • -- -- --•1 b: .• ••••cv-7•&, - r.&,.. ci. .. 4-' .a.a/70,7 • -i I_ ..y.yfr;1 f LA 47/7,0;II..W.M.FI7 . ..1-. •zz , Awrp )11 06,7c.:p•Aro,-.env. p*.--iri•••.,IC..item% 4 .7.4,1 •••)r,• i •• . _ 4 k • • •':7_!".••-•• ''''I'l L 4or 1_). 7 rZ/I 7,114•7,1" I• . . _ .... ___. • , . I e. i yridebacyr-Arj 7..1.•7,3,,,,,,, . A _ ___; •?"://rir'',...:, ' 41 0..V.-77.erAve , • • 0 . 7•9'...,41.rr0.7). -V 7a#,17.4,.• . 7. 12,14047#21 . "..17re rotiac-r- 1 - - -.. --I • -. - - . 1 , • • • . , r• ; . •.e",,s'1^a:v. p.3.77..vv,•: . •v,v, ..r.:.4 • . .....);„. 41.•:-...•,..; 1-•••,..-..r.n..,....v., i I • ' ' '' • t leIciZ___1:TuroTA 08-050-a # c ar..3 .c,..p .• - _. .. _i : 41.igyeill'oxnv/2Tituad TeToad.9-- --- - s.r.V.7, me/47r 1 I 0.-Psyv,r,....,,r i 4:2 P.w.i.v.,p•,,,,, (iss . mov.t.r.ri4y-f* ootonv&von_91 i Mignillalliargiriala 90E au 3 __. __. ... ......• ... • . _ . ------.—_—....—,,-- 1 -• _._._ . ao . 9 ,/ ,'.• ',7•1,4,.01I/S.-59' 1 .../.71',47•74:7 107 4. ,._ / i i - - •- - -1 i ! . ZIA, ••• •-. 1 , I ' • / 1:• - • ,• , ... .."',.../ ' ..... ' - -.4 • • - •- • P.1 y,..74...., , Av.:1,7. •'1VII.V.F.74V,V•• ,kt)1 . ... -. .- _ .• • '''\ p`,,.1 C.1.73.mr-Ane y.plo . 4 ..... /-G i !- -• -•- • • "I . s 7714[9 a,V7472713-gi.—a 0--CS) ttg . .: • • Iii . ,r..,....,,„,,,, • . :Pt : M 09 'X i 'r• . tb, k . • iti: il . PN/Ataii I ! , 7).".....%.11:15.7.). , .4"...r.,,,N, , •• l•• . iie/tlitki- i , '... .c,.. : . 1 ' ..r_ :A 1-0 0317'04 i ./ . 1 • • . • 107 ' i1 I I .• I i ri..),F.-.0.,,-.1:,.:- :':' • 1 .. — _ _ _ __ 1 i ,indrrigt74-22,I ! ....: 2 b''' 1 • — __. • I I ... 0 • a ,.1,1.• • I e 0. .. .7 1 I , Z;--..•_ - 1 .a07 • ,,,,,vs.,..-ry..), ! , r ,-. ArAtow"'WV I -----4--. ,-F,.—----.! I • II i . I • I -- - —' % . •. 1:,"' • i I• viv...s.or..- .Imo.cury, 1 . • \ 'eV 7790 I ";JO ' I citan, 5 AV" 20..o.:Irt. I SJ Mn,, .74",7401 I I 5 ' ' . I • [ wry.-107 - - 7 -- i I • a'%:.rm nodttrx av ii I ,4.L'7 •1 ..., L , I ..,. 1 L..:______• . ...; . ._..... .. ..... r IS xi 9 Yll ,. .• — . ":• 7 ------- 1..1 • .. —1—__—.....—-- -.-------- ' 1 .10'7'1 )6.Yra ri • ..SPPYJa...C.s: .f.r.gt•'LL:I' t..•-•:,,....4":-, .. • 107 • i 1 .3,1%1074c/7,1• 1 f•, f,4.P.V.0 • I -7, - 1 . • ' 1 • , . I ' 1:11....r,, .,•••,..,* • I I I.CP 177/W77' • -7 .t"•'-'I 11,-,• OF R4 0 THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 NU AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 a it BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH. MAYOR ® PLANNING DEPARTMENT 235- 2550 OgT�C SEP����<P July 14, 1980 RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON • Mr . Eugene Horbach HEARING EXAMINER Fifth and Park Place Company JUL1 51980 550 S .W. 7th AM Renton , Washington 98055 PM 71819110i11r12Fi i21364_15r6 RE : PARKING LOT BUILDING PERMITS Dear Mr . Horbach : Your application to obtain a building permit to construct five (5 ) parking lots prior to the legal review and disposi- tion of your request to use the subject parking lots as required parking for the 5th and Park Avenue Building can only be approved subject to your written concurrence that the granting of a building permit does not mean that the parking lots can be used for the 5th and Park Avenue Building . In addition, it should be understood that any changes that are required as conditions of the Hearing Examiner ' s decision concerning File No . SP-050-80 would have to be met . The Hearing Examiner will make his decision by Tuesday, July 22 , 1980 . The 14-day appeal period follows, and the Hearing Examiner ' s decision will become binding unless appealed . Please contact the Building Division for issuance of the building permit . Very truly yours , Gordon Y . Ericksen Planning Director "Viz, 1,4 Ro e' I J. B aylock Associate. Planner RJB:wr Concurrence: G-Lf;›? e)zt.5j / Eugene Horbach OF R4,1 ao = n ° THE CITY OF RENTON _ +' MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 y r z "I . ° BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 90 co- 235— 2550 9'1T0 SEP-CE°G M RANDUM July 11 , 1980 TO : Files FROM : Roger Blaylock , Associate Planner RE : CITY ATTORNEY ' S RESPONSE/BUILDING PERMIT REQUEST/ CONSTRUCTION OF 5 PARKING LOTS BY GENE HORBACH Today, I consulted with Mr . Dan Kellogg, Assistant City Attorney, concerning the issuance of building permits for 5 separate parking lots proposed by Mr . Eugene Horbach to provide the required parking for the 5th and Park Avenue Building. The applicant is requesting that the building permits be issued prior to the formal decision of the Hearing Examiner , Mr . Fred Kaufman, concerning the use of the parking lots as auxiliary parking, file SP-050-80 . Mr . kellogg informed me to make certain in writing that Mr . Horbach understood that issuance of building permits did not grant City approval to use the parking lots as required parking for the building. RJB :wr RECEIVED • CITY OF RENTON HEMING EXAMINEII JUL 151980 PM MA 7181911411,12%1I213 4t5t6 PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : FIFTH & PARK PLACE CO. , SP-050-80 JULY 8 , 1980 PAGE TWO D. PHYSICAL 3,ACKG88®UND: • - 1. Topography : The subject sites are essentially level . They have been leveled in the past for construction of buildings or use as parking lots for the adjacent building . 2 . Soils : The soils have been distrurbed during the last 100 years by urban development . 3 . Vegetation : Ali native vegetationn has been removed from the subject parcels in the past . Some landscaping has been placed on the parceles during previous periods of occpancy by single family residences or commercial buildings . 4. Wildlife : No wildlife is present except for small birds and small mammals associated with urban develop- ment . 5 . Water : Presently4 unimproved lots 2 , 3 and 6 do not have drainage into a storm water system. and have standing water on them during the year. 6. Land Use : Lots 2 , 3, 4 and 6 are presently vacant . #4 recently had a single family residence on it which had probably been constructed in the early 20 ' s. Lot #5 is presently the location of. the City of Renton water shops which will move . These uses appear to have been the primary uses during the last 10 years . Lot #6 is presently used by . Gary ' s Automotive as storage lot for their business . E . NEIGW,®II81»OOD CHARACTERISTICS : The neighborhood is in transition from single family residential to multiple family residential and commercial primarily along the major arterials of Park Avenue North and North 4th Street and North 6th Street . Much of the remaining area is established single family residential . Some vacant lots can be found along with the newly developing commercial areas. F . .PUI:LIC SERVICES : 1 . Water and Sewer : 6" water mains extend north-south on Park and Pell,y Avenue while an 8" sanitary sewer runs north-south approximately 100 feet west of Park Avenue. A 6" sewer main also runs north-south approximately 100 feet east of Park Avenue. . 2 . Fire Protection : Provided by the City of Renton • Fire Department per ordinance requirements. 3 . Transit : Six transit routes (107 , 108 , 155 , 156, 240 and 340) operate on Park Avenue North immediately in front of the building. 4. Schools : Not applicable. 5 . Recreation : . Not applicable.. G. APPLICAOLE SECTIONS , OF THE ZONING CODE: 1. Section 4-711 , B-1 Business Use . 2. Section 4-712 , L-1 , Light Industry. 3 . Section 4-722 (B) , Special Permits . • PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIQ1M1!'`RY r'EP®RT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC . HEARING JULY 8 , 1980 APPLICANT : FIFTH & PARK PLACE CO. FILE NUMBER : SP-050-80 • A. SUMMARY & PURPOSE OF REQUEST: The applicant seeks special permit approval to allow use of several properties for off-site parking lots . B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1 . Owner of Record: EUGENE HORBACH 2 . Applicant : EUGENE HORBACH 3 . Location : (Vicinity Map Attached) 400, 430 , 533, 601 Park. Place North and 538 Pelly Avenue North 4. Legal Description : A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Planning Dept . 5. Size of Property : *97, 500 square feet (combined) 6. Access : Via N . 4th Street , N. 5th, N . 6th, Park Avenue North and Pelly Avenue North 7. Existing Zoning : B-1 , Business Use 8 . Existing Zoning in the Area : B-1 , L-1 9 . Comprehensive Land Use Plan : Commercial , Heavy Industry, High Density Multiple Family 10. Notification : The applicant was notified in writing. of the hearing date . Notice was properly published in the Seattle Times on June 25, 1980 and posted in three places on or near the . site as required by City ordinance on June 27 , 1980 . C . iHIIST®RYi:AACI Q;98QDQDND: The subject properties were annexed into the City by Ordinance #156 of 1909 and #738 of 1925. The parcel at 601 Park was rezoned from S-1 to B-1 by Ordinance #1637 of September 24, 1957 . • J / PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : FIFTH & PARK PLACE CO. , SP-050-80 JULY 8, 1980 PAGE FOUR 2 . The building permit for the Fifth & Park Bldg . was approved for a three-story building with the first floor being utilized for parking. On-site • parking including Lot #1 would have .accounted for 126 of the required 180 parking spaces for the then 36, 000 sq . foot office building. With the developer enclosing the first floor and reducing the total available parking and at the same time increasing the total square footage to 54,000 square feet , the required parking increased to a total of 270 parking spaces . 3. The applicant is seeking a special permit to allow auxiliary. parking under the requirements of Section 4-2204(C) . This section clearly states that "if sufficient parking is not available on the premises . of a use , excepting single and two-family dwellings , a private parking lot may be provided on a commercial basis subject to the approval of the Planning Depart- ment and under the following conditions." The applicant is proposing providing the private parking lot in 5 segments. These segments are located on three separate blocks. The wording of the ordinance would appear to suggest that the term auxiliary in the sub-section title is inappropriate . Auxiliary has three meanings according to . Webster ' s New World Dictionary. The first suggests that auxiliary is "helping or assisting , ". giving aid to the support of the primary intent. The second meaning is "subsidiary ." And the third is additional or "supplementary . " If we were to consider the last two definitions , the term of auxiliary is appropriate. However, adding the first definition ° the term auxiliary should be changed to "off-site parking . " The intent of the wording of this Section, 4-2204(C) (1 ) suggests that a private parking may be provided to meet the parking demand of the primary building. It does not suggest that a series of parking lots are acceptable. 4. Six criteria are established in the Parking & Loading Ordinance to allow auxiliary parking away from the primary structure. If following is an analysis of those six. criteria applied to all of the proposed parking lots . Condition- A: "The parking lot must be within 500 ' of the use it is intended to serve . " Parking Lots 3, 4, 5 and 6 are within ' the required 500 foot maximum distance from the primary building . Parking Lot 2 is approximately 550 ' feet from the building ; however, the applicant argues that parking lots 2 and 3 are connected by an alley which has been leased to the applicant. The alley. was vacated in the past and is owned by TR Inc . Parking Lots 2 and 3 are separated by the Circus-Circus Fabricating plant and parking lot and the State of Washington licensed half-way house. Both of these are presently under a sub-lease from the applicant . • PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : FIFTH & PARK PLACE CO. , SP-050-80 JULY 8, 1980 PAGE THREE H . APPLICAALE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICI''',L CITY DOCUMENT: 1 . Land Use Report , 1965 , Commercial , Page 11 and objectives, pages 17-18 . I . IMPACT OF THE NATURAL OR HUMAN ENVIRONMENT : 1 . Natural. Systems : Impacts are minor on the natural systems . The areas proposed for parking lots have . already been used in the past for urban development . 2 . Population/Employment: The parking lots themselves will not generate population or employment . The building that the parking lots will serve will accommodate approx . 300-325 employees in the 54 ,000 • sq . feet of useable space. This is based upon the fact that Boeing typically places 6 employees in each . 1 ,000 . sq . ft . City standards would anticipate that the employment would be approximately 250-270 new employees . 3 . Schools : Schools should not be impacted by the • additional employment from the facility . , 4. Social : Additional social interaction will result from the actual employment of people within the building. The scattering in the parking lots suggests another -social interaction in that people will spend more time walking between their employment location and the location of their cars . 5 . Traffic : Public Works estimates minor traffic impacts because most of the lots presently function as parking lots . However, the distribution will have an unknown impact on circulation and on-street neighborhood parking patterns. J . ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION: Pursuant to the City of Renton ' s Enviromental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended , RCW 43-21C, a declaration of non-significance has been issued by the Environmental Review Committee on June 11 , 1980 . The appeal period expired on July 2 , 1980 . K . AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED : 1. City of Renton Building Division . 2 . City of Renton Engineering Division . 3. City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division . • 4. City of Renton Utilities Division . 5 . City of Renton Fire Department . ' L . PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS : 1 . The applicant is seeking a special permit to allow off-stree parking under Section 4-2204(C) of the Parking & Loading ordinance. Five off-site parking lots would provide 222 new parking spaces according to the plans submitted by the applicant on June 6, 1980 . Sixty-six would be provided on-site . Included in the 66 parking spaces are the 18 parking spaces for Lot #1 which is adjacent to the building . ii\L\ This has been determined by the Planning Dept . to be an on-site parking lot. PLANNING DEPARTMENT • PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : FIFTH & PRK PLACE BDLG . , SP-050-80 JULY 8 , 1980 PAGE SIX Condition E : "Except for emergencies , no auto repair or service of any kind shall be conducted on any such parking area . " The plans submitted do not suggest that this *type of activity will be conducted on any of these lots . Condition F : "No charge for use of such parking areas shall be made in. any residential zone except on a weekly or monthly basis . " The subject parcels involved are zoned 8-1 , Business Use and this section is not applicable . 5. The proposal suggests an unusual method of providing parking for the principal use. With the scattering of 5 parking lots into an area which is in transition from single family residential to multiple, family residential and commercial uses , suggests that the intrusion of these areas may increase the pace of that transition and actually create blight to adjacent residential uses . The Comprehensive Plan General Development Objectives on page 17 states clearly "prevent blight by protecting residential and other exclusive districts from unwarranted infiltration of incompatible uses which would contribute to premature decay and obsolescence and present the development of orderly growth patterns. " Scattered parking .lots do:not ;appear to be "orderly growth" . The setting of a precedent to allow multiple parking lots to service a primary use would result in unknown cumultive long-term impacts on the adjacent neighborhood. These impacts could result in premature decay of that established neighborhood thus creating a blight situation which would possibly have to be remedied by public funds . 6. The applicant has been requested on several occasions landscaping plans to assure that the parking lots are adequately screened from adjacent uses . Two tentative plans have been submitted but as of this date we have received no final landscaping plans on the project . Landscaping may mitigate some of the visual impacts on the adjacent neighborhood but this. can only be analyzed based upon detailed landscaping plans. M. PLANNING DLiP4`•QBTINILNIT RLCDRIMLDNIA1Tg(ONI: Based upon the above analysis it is recommended that the Hearing Examiner approve Parking Lot 3 and 5 as submitted and Parking Lots 4 and 6 as revised by the Traffic Engineering Division subject to the following conditions : • 1 . Approval of detailed landscaping plans by the Planning Department prior to the Public Works Dept . approving and accepting the parking lots for drainage and access control . 2 . Improve the alley-way between Parking Lots 4 and 5 and south of Parking Lot #4 to North 5th Street per Police Department ' s request . • PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : FIFTH & PARK PLACE CO . , SP-050-80 JULY 8, 1980 PAGE FIVE The applicant has been requested to provide copies of the leases to assure the City that legal parking will continue after the approval of the special permit . As of this date , the Planning Department has not received those requested leases . The ordinance is quite clear that the parking lot must be within 500 feet therefore all of parking Lot #2 is illegal and cannot be considered in meeting the requirements of' the building . It is obvious that with the present structures between the two parking lots that the parking lots do not function 'as one parking lot but as two separate parking lots with an access between them. Condition B : "The parking lot shall be subject to all applicable provisions of this ordinance . " Based upon plans submitted on June 6th, Parking Lots #3 and 5 meet the ordinance requirements for dimensions of stalls, aisles and accesses . Parking Lots and 6 have been redesigned by the Engineering Dept . to meet minimum Parking &Loading Ordinance • requirements and also minimum cub-cut requirements. The alley linking parking lots 2 and 3 suggest that 20 parking spaces are appropriate . However, the Fire Dept has commented that the fire lane must be 12 ' wide and according to dimensional require- ments , Section 4-2206(1 ){B) , the width of parallel stalls is 9 feet which totals 21 feet . Thereofre, the alley is unuseable for parking and the 20 parking spaces contemplated are not available. With the elimination of parking Lot #2 and the modifications to the other parking _ lots , only 146 off-site parking spaces are available. This,• in addition to the 66 provided on site provide inadequate . parking for the building as presently constructed. Only 212 parking spaces are useable according to code requirements . 270 parking spaces are necessary for the building . However, if the Hearing Examiner was to consider that Parking Lot #2 was acceptable under the require- ments of the code , the the applicant would be providing 262 parking spaces . This does not comply with the required parking necessary for the 54, 000 square footustructure. Condition C : "The parking lot shall be subject to front yard setback requirements of the zoning district in which it is located" . All of the parking lots proposed are on B-1 zoned property with no front yard setback requirements . Condition D: "The parking lot may be located in any zone district except those zoned exclusively for single and two-family dwellings . " All parking lots are zoned B-1 , therefore this condition is complied with. PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC . HEARING : FIFTH & PARK PLACE BUILDING , SP-050-80 JULY 8, 1980 PAGE SEVEN 3. Submission and approval of restrictive covenants securing the use of the property solely for the purposes of parking for the above referenced building running with the land and to apply in perpetuity . 4. Improvement of the alley north of the Parking Lot #3 to North Fifth Street per the Fire Dept . requirements . 5 . Construction of a six (6) foot high solid screen fence on th.e south side of Parking Lot #3 adjacent to the State licensed half-way house to comply with Section 4-2204(8) (B) ( 1) of the Parking and Loading Oridnance. i�ritrivG !.' .2GQUEO 5-I I , 9 - - - SA'ef'S f•. LOT Auto yorivE i • AVRC'rilt.vT Fo.NYiya ! i • GOMFLEt' A�oTf/EfS • STo[AG6 I /'4RK ® <o7 iP - -- — -- N. 6'' ST • .. EX/,,TiL(9 GT✓ 1 i of zrldrou N4T,e - I �-- - nor"`„' ,�,G .,�1 I PIL/F/C NW I • � f auad L3ccc I BELL d Ob I [•' i \ I C.) aaramopoe F'LQK//a I Ij ., • • • .CE•S-'LE-r-.f I LO TO I -_. I1 . f �M4va%'GEr/ST7,.vG �., oe Lnr ¢ / j !- Pv SrC•P1i REJ/LLtA'tAL :::**.%7 I t 4 • LOT i I sYwar- - — - I-1f • ! W iecah eF3,o5 vs,.L / / I 7a ///6 21 -''- - V i I tor /' t ry • . JI - - - - -t - - -- I j r / �) P�tiorvriAt I 1'1 V - - -• _ I I I , 4- r 4e a2eciwr eTAccs 1• : - - --'- --- 8 I I tr I : (tee-.4CGtaTEGT6 -•;, ,\T' V e�v ..sEJ/Eyl/AL I ' . /•Ni oRTS I i '44. �w6 /iN.J I .rr S/1".r./77.1.' \ DOTL -/ 4 L07 CNEMiCA�.. �� ,as SiiOsyiY ,p6s/oEvrm,L I- / - - I- I Co. e r!:4- /1.Vt,w.S 'V41 �r". .4 v44.-'. : 4r, ,"4• ''''y , 'tra I6UO.dN030+ f • I sLLCNfriN GA CC<s,t .ar ace any. P1/yf/N6 fG SNAMPCO —Special Permit/Aux. arking - - - - - File # SP-050-80 Vicinity Plan :!L1.47%/26 CorME4YJ1L NQO GI i, _1- 1 I!7KlLL/.Va IaLob tNiN4-r "' ..v • , i ro_ _ _ _ rAt Atcdl' J I HI,:7Il'L F. I•f1Si06.vriet PA,err/ND 2 0 0�✓YLL/NG I s07 �$1 1--——~ - — . I oi✓4Ccc/.4.1G I RB310C4MAL 't LOT I 2 I— - L O T (, • • iF-l I ,163/OENTAL 3 ®l ' O4•fKGf7E y47C 6T w4. 4 Q e t TiJ/•S E:407/RE.'34 4-_ I Zo,uED J• )JD E.P axial bw,u E�6- I Ia B- / p .nv/i Wi/r. ;,c18t,64E \ {N - - k1.i TO ..TA7E OF'/'4. 4/L/i IC'KLug-tom I ' Xwo c%eCu. 'r_/Ree./-3. rAa/cAT/I 5J ; I xaurt i ct �In • .aa.i•- I >41 j ,,I I A'..E4'7,4/I-zoJ 1D V I y B-/ p�i LOT ? j AEG., . . yQ, r A, -J " .sr 1 . . . ..• • ' • ‘ , ' . -.. • . • • . • ' • • . . • ;‘,.....„) •,....., t 1 5.) r 411) 1 S' . .l_,,• • '_... • 1 . I 1 7 ..-....s. % rICON...G1-:- -71 L'.1,105 I . . . 1 . ' ! . ' ! • -.9 - 0 ' .• . . . 11• / .•o' .I t . :e...:._.„.._ _ ..st2.t•-0. 0.. 51-a" ”.•4... . . -1."°_ .- "a" :.-'°" ';'1.--%. Sil,:`... 1--•::..0*---- - ___ --i--Z --I - 2,i'..a. 1 f ,(,..0'"1"."."-- - ^7.c•vik...-.Y LINE. I - T -,;---- -------; . .:.-- ,-- ,...,...1,•'-‘,:. (..•'.4.0../-.: I 1 1 ' ,,,---let 1.4.15.42.2 .Cr''..A:7-.5. -,• 01. /7-11 r-AN:TEli.----• -• • cq 1 ',4,.:rt...• -cit -; . ' .. . .. r2.--7-•,:.. - 0 ............1......A '%./......_ • • . •4*[e....... a.s.r,t,-i7-7C3 • I 0 N.,.•7.1. ."?', N --: - . . • , '...., .;.y. i° t•?'. 12...13.,ii -5- --.;.!.- •" . i . . - 0 l ' '',....t... . i i `...1.:*-0:,....4 c.,.....":-.,1•4, ; - - 7- i 4 . ....-: .1 .--. -- ,... tO c.:00r-,... • . : e , - ,...B: . "...; :WI.-•.4 ..?..."i/>. - - - 4.•\4 as e..t....7.......1, ...i..e..X. •-;.....•,..1 -rt,.........3 1 7: . --• :0-,..,,,d-_,, ____ ''' --•,...• --- -- .-\, - • - - ••.- - - • _..." • 4, _. , '.::--J . . c.. . ,', .. • ._ . . . ...__ .. ___• • ' 1 ,... ...SS->7.N c-u.....p•es; i: , •4- 1 ..,.., -. _ ,,,,i‘ \ (1"/ \\ ,. • .••• • •,„, , e• Ili -18 17 -it.`-•. .1.;,, , ' .‘i, .''''-',A, , . ''' ei,'- 41 ..,-...- '"J . • . • ' V IP '....,r',1 '? 12 . ''..elLit.\• \\ • \,2,4. t--.7. .,,..) 5,..,. V• ..t."',.:,...-, 7 I %. , _ , ... -\•• .. \ , .... . . . x.,..... • • ' 4.t..`, , -'- ,;;.4.. .•- i. ," .!'fi•i-.1;....r4"••• AA) • • . . . .,.. . ,e••,........g.-- 9 ‘ 1 ..?. • ,t-T•. •...,.. t. ..- 'M.. 7 4, • '''' • '.--'-'-•—.-- .1 •c....... - .7--,...:... I. ,... .,.. I ••• ‘1.• • •,. . . ...y....-.4 •01 .00 it Zo I 2, 1" -:it' 1' 1; I ay I 1 4e- -'1;r''''-g 7,:, 16 r 27 I 14-VV2 3o I li,,Le. , .7:'"i ,.• % - •0. r_.-....1,4_ .... --.:EZ-X1 .-....-• • ..... r......... .1 C.e. • v .-. —1' . • .1.:.,Co— ---• ;,_ t ,, '-() tr, ..• C..'-'.: _4 -:..-........,....-. -7.: ---,--. 5 _ •-- _ , _., 4& - 41 I. /Q. I qr 1 'ilc t4, 0 .L1 qz I fr I ifo I —/ " ze.• I 37 I _3_,...cl..H 36. ,,I, lif I 33 cl. 32- ,..e7IN .t. ,, . .) ,`, , I f--\ . f - • - t:T'l • ''' • t. • .'z--', e.71 ri" , , r:-r N. ‘) '• ' 't ....,...... „.-,.. ...). .... (....._. ,..Src,.._,‘ ,. 1. 1 •• , ./^1\,_ . , • ' • l'4- ..1...J;40. ' ,,C ....,..4..,;:_,.......---1.-- • R , ..., - -CLA: --P.- ...C.,,,-..-1 -,...' 1.8•... i. '...1••••_ i STAFF COMPISIOr L ---- •-, 4 -......T... "PAel<I'N& ,......Pvt._ -.•••••-•••:, ea 6.1.1g4e7L;;,..-;' ,5r.74.1".aro.'t':it:1`-'i7r-"PlIi.,,- ',:f.' '';-:-,-7.....:7,--....-.1:: ,-.. BEk 0---eicovros o--50 Spacas 5th & Park Place Co. . . G useable —kis sio..Gas Cril .4 i(s) 7.tv.1- ,....,,,ova) FAR K AVE N. • ..• I :. —5-pecial Permit/Aux. Parking • • . File # SP-050-80 Main..Bldg. Site Plan - / . . • • ... • E.4-/sriA/'G /b G'✓A/w/ t/./,L _ FENCE (TYR) 7b,-AL f}1.P.C/.c./3-LOT / -='/B�PgCE-52,,6) (b o f B 3•S Gat./0.3CAPE A.PEA'[.ar /=55`b - , /- "Ij:-_I_ -!-.�.�.q. .-- 1 q i�cc FF/'E 1 I ( Z I /7 / Z'//'.' -g •�ACE.3 I ed r+'�z NA/N L/.v ' • DCS.ti I - _ + ;P..t•L750../ 6•<<N�L �I✓ k r..-_Jso3 j rr� q - - 1 I� , f�l/i/ �` I V i ' i i ^za o0 i j ; f¢. - - - - - --' I--1 liV 1 1 I— 14 C'w 6-7 .P6yOiE :'l.S.' �' sre ✓c s 'C:ei`.4 /Y!�..7.,-„PEsze/cr.c + I I ., G- --- `, --- �c ..v_sryt_- <'c �.1Ec-O67A14)/Z,N.290o I /N✓*29 63�\ I I A ^� I ��� o a n so 8" es ,�.4/Dlt I � I NIi /JRQG " N.. i � a tn • T� r WC6-FX/J> 96 —8"cMP - 1 /NV=2a/T CP•SOei _ $ w1a1d/.' . hl —, B' ek/4 LB SOi ! �lld7 ii, i - -..>•.t'_/.:r .o.:-,..eXE'e -1.Gi�NA-K, !G./Jrt' ' .'J''• I/o.-vX...I�r S*.3"� 4�' . v e ' "cove/v - �~_t•'-- __------ cur /'/^r.• . 0wv Za 09 d Q RIMS -B.35 �F I I /N✓I�3.2m.S5 --__ 1.__.._-___ - - `a k � ARd�T �� FdS T 1 NI N S T'y S/• "S3 M N � 4L✓CUT E.t•:S'J/NG � 1$TO :•I '_— — — 1=�.`J.,9 ,,4 L%4/ 424._0ar„-e =rvyu - N890�18'9S"E NV•<:; -- - -- --- 1G°= .g '� /N✓20".=Z/S7 --_—_ /N✓ zi•'w-r/4.-, TOT /u✓ •N,�3.22 4/ 1'I — C .¢, Jcr-;sir—rr'TE.,? I • N: I CB U✓GQ Ex/. 7/N6 20" A�` t S- e 5 L/NE �9 z9`4 ;c•` Cnti.`:;',CI y., , a.r t' I . II 9 , ti Special Penni_t/Aux. Parking N File SP-050-80 j Main &uld. Site Plan - Lot 1 ZQ b h til • 1 . I • ksT �o IP 4 ^ • L.'.41.riee't P,....L ..iii 1 ' • • , -—40. • •-7r, . _ "-Lam,/ .c-A/572, • . • •. A.51.••••••34 7 /,7 N .,.. 774„--a a•- •",q , 4-4•C- .----- c.r‘.......,•14&" ,,,- t" ...,A : •.3.z 7° ..--, .- /.23- ! : . , , 1 - 1 - 1 . 191 . 1 " 1 -• 1 " 1 - ' .. fl 9 I( 1 . 1 • •• ',..0 c a 1 • . t ' ' ••• .--,• R owl!.33•C I • 34 ArAer/V.,..6-;117- .., -. "....,1 • . CeMil'4,..c;,,, .1-• 2:13"'.1 7-*----,.4-2: , -, nwsnez.cr n)4e/ •N Pe:VA-WA.'.4..../e10,4/•. S .5/.7.e---2.......j,•_.,----.' 3 1•1- 31.3" 33.;.. ., 3:•1/ I,•• ' 7—1 I 1 • ;• . i . I i. • .'.- . , - 91. . 1.). : ‘,......--.2...4.•- I• 1 I ; g 1, ! I . I I 1 iy,LLL 1 1 , ,... 7 ,.,, ./ . .. , z ' A/Vagc,4 P.e.c,• ...4 :4'.6 ../ , Z._I. ,Z. (•7-. .\' i ;• . ;.9.0 I ! i A/U I 1 I i I l I, ' .'‘!.. . 1..t 1 I' ' ' /3 S:4;4 4 f 5 1 • : - x ,LO , i . ,t, ! • • i .40, -.:,Na ! 1 1 i • •• • . • * • r----•-xii•, • 31;1 1 • t !!':-..za',,N"'. , / / Q• ..... ..,.?...i-— --I- — -• — — — —,— -!- — --,-- — f- --I --. — 'II I \.-- I \ .• . 15 CON:TYROL r I. . 33,2. , I I •X,---AA4re;41 4--r/S77,va •_.1 --- ...,30/"....Va 1 OR,),E-WA r .• % -6%9••,.,2 res.--2- j,..„,ale,lows 2"4-.4 -54-A4k,0 723e -k tt• N Z749I, .... -- - - - :-‘ , „.--- k- • !N.,' • - •k;,6: . . I ,....2. ,.. ,•• , t•i, ! . ! •k)•,; ! i • !, I , • . , • ••0 -.• . i l• , I : :1 I . . : ,.- • ...o • /.3 .5",f7A4-A-5" • • • , p, , ,t,• • •N • • " - N I- • ,,,, 42:1 • . , 1 t14 I I i L' Li" C i•Jc Ara ___1_,_ ,... 31'7---- -7 - . .. - - . _ • . .. . - • 0 , Z,4. . •.• • ,' • - • - . - • 9 . • - -1%1-C1 1 • " . • . . - ,. . .,.. ' 'E":•?;/.57i14./a...S/.;%'...t:-.4);Wic''..1\ I! .,P4 Li c5-E,Ir.44/6 '---•...ko.r.a, • , I Ro 1:-II 00 -_. — 44 .4. .•O .._ .._ .• -.•t T.,,v6 42.P/ /v...4,-5": 1)1 Iv/•27 40 iyo 7E"•• TO .,...T.' -P.e.....L.4 c.e-o• .e.&-/-7,2",'E- .6---41/.3•7:•:.(Za .-47-4,0-..4/a e.7--V ,..:-..,C...1 if_c../.Ter•C (..::--.53•4,..-••1•••••t" ,6..1 7-Z, ..e.d...G.-€.4.0.:...., ......44.--(E- ..4.•t/.0 . A/4 TN 57.- ........,-...,-...,„. .o.e."4-4,4464. •••1..5.* ' . MO t4-i-4 4-1.'!ZirCed.,:;4',1-4',t'.6'41 1!.;3;,',..:1•1-•e'..44.,.,..1.-Ve.N4.4..M2nr,-Eh 5th & Park P ace •. . _ ____ __ —Special Permit/ Am. Parking .-._; File WI. SP-050-80 Parking Lot 2 . i _ A'6157-:•e/c7".0,,e C.C. z,Ar 7-,4 ' ee/.4.1 • LEvATiotti , _. .. - e".1P. Rim I /NV I oVER,Zeie ourie7 aehr/e.e• //:_--,'.-,. ///- .5/ze am CNA iN-Zacyxe e.".4.....4c/r1-' ,.—7.-7 ....5...‘-4,-.:-.A- is.,,,,,,A, (7,47,L, /5 4 29 Oa 124 43 275a 8" ././4 ‘20/1,3/ it/,,z, ,-//....1/2V TO es9 .,- f 50 90 126 70 29 9.9 _1 .f3" / 9- _ a 5''.,•,/4/ ! 1 —— .• I 1 : I. 1 • /'Hi& 2.36 TOTAL 416. oF .37:41 44.6 PA'ocW0g0 .2 70 AdO ok"-. 7ALL,6 ,eecpcJheED .c'e,,E' BzJicz:v.Lie: (5,, a 00 ..3Q. F7.-) 1 ...WY. . •••-•1/..W..44,1 ••. C,"•••1- • T--. , .... a.5% ) ,....7,- , ...7 . I 1 • 2'fri/.4/ 1. i • , • I 4405c.4.,4 , - AREA- "1,./,//• -,.;.4'-,•',../'.:, , . • ' ''.•':.-er ' ..•7."-fm/ :- f . ‘'N\ N _5- oR M11 1.4,-1 /V 1,11/Z 0'C:z/6-72 - -7- (MT--;I -'-,:.7,---- 0\12.: mit/ 24W.,2,4., lf3 ' . i Ay v •z•V,5,2Z 4/ - - ,.,•,...5",,,e,..,"/ •1 ,,--•,-5 ',L.&, . 1 I _,,•-/_,.4,/,-1 .‘ - • '" 7- /2" , I ,- ' - . 9• : 1 v, 1 1 !1 1 1 , • , ,, . I L...\.) • ... • s'l 1 I' 1/4 de,..4 • ''‘, ' - 1 ,c7. .5"7:4Z_L.5 /A/ ...4ZZZY 0,... 1 0 0 4.4A:03 c.4.04"..4,eg-4 ,/3 (ror.4z ...1,ezA,.9voo so.Fr) - 1 .‘,.) ----- ... , / .. li 1‘) \ •; z _____,, .74,-, .)••• _ 4) 3 ,7.- °_ -' 9:A- - t 1 ..te i'..•=r..;;;:•.e.6.-.T.;tk,. ,,,vx.‘43-•,--,v41.4,0-,,k0,•...Ext bar ' ace o. i —Special Permit / Aux. Parking File t SP-050-80 Parking Lot 3 _ oi 30.,,,, 0 ,-- Way, - ..,..- , • ,-- , TOTAL .,0A.e.C.64-4";-LOT-3 = ,0 — __--;,/...4.u.0,3Geto--- ACE-xl -[or-3 = :,- '5:",.-- • ,t,',.'.1727 ,-;,3.A, • ,., ..57.,s, ,/'N•''.ii) ..- • ,.--•,....;..."‘„, I,-, 4 .2,0,- I /—- Ff- +: k!,11- .f.C a 0[4 rk- "A/..,,e0c›.=" , A5',,-,41 f /3c q 0•A r _ --_ p 0 04.46" ev.ay' ll... •e • ------ .9•.0,e,..-,..4.,,, -• tz• , ^1, t,. N Q 9 6 ..--,5 .•7- 7,,,,,I _____ .4G`EET- , \ \ , ::- “. ,,.•--27 ao \\\ 1 ----- .....-- ' \ 0 . \ ':----2,......_ \ \ \ ---- ,c1 I \ , \ ..z..2..5-\__ \ 3= \ - --,/ , 4/320i L\ . s yy . R `i1 dd ^F f7„..e. .^, t l '-t`• ti�==- ..•S`'J'1` t J"� ``t• :.A. yi `x4 !" .. !. -a-' `''-- -•• 'a, :Yi °F' s Y-•:e'. '(` ,'., .• ,..+` *`• . -t r<;; •+: } h �.�- .rt. rr k',ia.4 L .,.. i -a w { .s•, aer • F '•• *�� ". raw„n . k '� +.t .< ..},- '�[_• «�'4 -.'�;c vt "s r ' .,,., u. -6 o-rca -"S- > F .?„4 '� .•`}L-`�' 1`r'4. �':? r°- :.:- t- i' .i n...„ W. �C a -r`7 •=f td •� _... w .> f, r. ti r"` • { .. fd,,,.-1 .yy;aa aK 1 `a k .' '. �' ),; • ••-s ••.t s -..n - •x c . r , '�5 i .f`r g `,+p P r f1Tf. -.- � '' . "'" ''i9 ...t .Z•'ch- a``` t , c. ', "�� `'' ns $' ',471 t1 • '!r�1 d 33} u •-.1 ;3ti 4.i. Jj, 1. ' • ,,.91:_ '.r yC • 1'i.` '', •d ..y::r„� 1` .:..,z**.t.�n+17..`!i `ice• .,, 4_ • . :---F.,;'r'" , Sri i t t'-4i fC ,7 ,r" '3'' v • 171 7d 1..s3 . - ••'�'.t74 it f,.., t•.+... r 'y r. 'S` .- r 3`-u t`i',.e•r ,•j i"n,�^:;:4: ' ''t •µ��� ' ' -��JYN/ %YiHoiYs . %;-,�'� �'� 4�'�n' �x'� �� 3r?�it�+�.�i�"7#::::. I'd'a 77y1S'NI ONN ,eI. ,"'dF's5z F�` +T"a # d#"'•«.` y.:4...1v' d `90dd'99� '�107 a'Od� - .y z::t 17'�w=e � '� ""C .'�"� �'Y,}•^'C�k /Y/07//J� '/1S/X9 9i101a���' _.`°:,;"s>.. ), s .£�s : ;+>j8• s. .9di71 01S Q�yg.i .\ \ N 'r�:i_' ,:.' -,::y +_Y°�l:y: 4. �1.7 J1S/yn) j • Ib��r6r N1N 06 B2 • rs•czr7<y r�dy fin r. mir �1 _ a. b.�7 0 �' ' `r .- /.-M ��1 NOi1N319d' 3JN�',l'q.S' J �, \• • VP114\ 4 \, ' \ o-��b srr/ovxo�r� Aga O�/If�s 3� Ol �f�77 _f, _ -- - __—-- L07-P7aGo 7D'1QLLiii b'.9N/1S%�.y 9 vim my ON/1S^X_9 /l�lYly �rCal4 of Y:no q^�is 0!✓Y vN<onng .o Br.., ,o-r.- �I'-t}1(p — - .. . , -4. ?si-75•LF- zi 1_4r, , _ ��v�s ,� or r `tz p1 /*P� E Tr-Al�,1 _71 N007_7a�3:::-;:' I I r op N \ n2, _ r a_' ` - -. 1 o �•�brl V Ioaa„ I- I �' dl+'I,y I yf�/�� L_1s^/rim I (� I fDln �\I i 'moo — I \ I -- -1 .1.i 'I -,, , :....: ---1\[____/- X. 3.71' 1'1111.11k:I r9y�rgrg �`v I ,...,,,..,_7a, I rt::: ri.r7 Yti I.0 L'/Yi.C'CA HJ16._7 7N/15'/Y�N/ III SI.7. _,--a'-' : I. x saY�l Nd i✓d..�S' d'�1!%M/-• I -- Y`�, ` • �, •[..: - Y / ,/0 77N1.c'/Y/ E I_ L!.L Jc'r O N. o I 6 on , ' — _I . I - — lp I^ 1 _ _ - I % I I ; r I � I ® I I u sv-••,.- Co I Z s = �10?- v�ay �d�CQ/YJYI I y'41' I. r�_;��itb� .�1ci 1 9 +� I I -'UE�L /L =5107-Ji'Y/a�?'U�-f 7L'1Q!_ • I I /' r J' - - •_ _ ,9 ozi-..eo-.6" ,...-‘1m.---•;:• •--•-4-,-;:`:•,- PEZAk 411t ccPark ace -Lfii''-ew . -- . - - • , A ecial Permit / Aux. Parking __..... C.f7-1/S7-. ae 7' -.• --.E.-A.-,..;•r,-4-4, r-----z as'zze,v.6-‘,/.4 File li SP-050-80 Parking Lot 5 1 7 a'a Z -- 2-i'n-AL e.. '1.]---,,, ,: ff-,,,..„, br ---2 /4- — — -4,-v--;-:.,,..„,_ ‹ ,, ------T- 01%, . -_,".•47.d'!VALK ,-, „A 4L2O..2.3 c, , ,' il.,,N-X.'N N ;:`..-._;•.. ,•;-:,, ..,_ . • ,ff.:.f.7-2•;`,'7 friv N `1` *. -i , ,e,e-iyve.e-ArzOC..4 nu- ' pui.e..L4 94 < , \ J‘' ON 0• 1. I., oii.5 , 2 •. • ' ID R.,,,,•27 77 ., 71 ' •NA r..., . • .--,R., ...2 7/.2 4 \ . --- . - A 'I• •. . , I - 1\ , I 'i ... , -,r----• - -----I" _ _._ .__ • --j---- • 4._ 4., _ _ 6 i 1 ' . N , _ ._______ -•x ‘ 4) i ro774c ":34e..e...a../a-Lor-5-=Zi. . . • - . - / __ 4.4.4.10.3e_..4.cE ...4..e.54 -407-5- .=. -5-.2.7., i I 4. II et • .2';',4 7.‘. . : , - sj .--.---.7--)---'' 4.D.Z.-- - -- N.. E.- .•5 7;,..v.; .7 e,p-,:"i••••4-' ,..'0 - , 7-, e Le- .c.;r:.,---,4 ce-.., ,,-.,-,v t:, stj Q j I: 7., • \ ..1....,77-..A2 - \7 N: ‘i . _ . k.I - - - -... .... --r- . , y v , . ,) • _ ._ • _ •\ -- _ , 47,c ..L - - --=4 -N 5 .,.., .___ • i ___--1-- _ ., ,,f. ;,..., 4.•61 7 ,.. _,._I , . _ ' n7 - .1 „Z----- ' /VOTE.. _Li . I' •-. __---:-.-- ' I ____ I ‘e•I • . ,..-- - •'I- '' • , • 1-- - ' /A/.6-..r/..577/VG c'-.4 7-C.,,, I e-.2. A.'-_,-4,CE.5 Ze2 T zr, ----1' 11. .,6'-..e:.•25- I.. \\ki -4 • • .7 •- ,) J I . ; i• ! ; • . r ; 1 1.: • . I I .''' ___ ..., .. , ,_ -11 1 I ._ . , _ _ ._ ..IN ... I . -1 • ._ _,. . . ... . • __ . . ____ ... . _ f, _ • ,, . . .. I • I • I . _ -, _ N N _ _ s . - L-I.__ NI NN . (.}. ! ) ! : -1 _ 1 ',Av.,7- 1 4' ' _ ___ . \ __ Cli 1 i, —\ . ..e..4,1... . • IC) 7.71,47 il P 1 1 iN I 0. i Jir — . 'Z a ' AA 1 --j1'4Z Tr- i---.".;•.,:- -_=q...._ -• - -- ---- ---c N ;N N I,- .Z.4 --,..Friic^ ., — _4"-- ,.., - •,,........v. •.......,.•,,s: -1•.-` 7:t,C- J.,e'.-., L-.17-57-/N 5%4ZZEP 7-. ' .5z-- /47,429 `, ,'. ,a..u, ,...-. . . , • , - -:...5,.N) , \ /0 7..1-• 1. ,6" s.f,d,,, :1 . \. ' if wlia2114... 1 rib r5 7 y f.-.. .. • • • . , . 7 L i t r.-.1. : .•;1',ti:® w� arc ace cmp I ' h ;, s,-i t —Special Permit / Ate. Parking • " '; R - File /r' SP-050-80 Parking Lot 6 File# �Pe -8 'ar ing Rh L%'5T Fie SP- -80 ' . GOARa•e.„.> Staff Revised Plans Lot 6 - ---- --.:.� .A _ .. ,S 8 jP ` 1p 6o ,�i • P'-�1 N '� ,;-e i`' :1i. q .+• , .. ,jti.;-:'.r•....., - -li.t-(.-C`�''�~�'`a`.'i.. '-i-% i:.-:.-r.. :r.;v;. Sl. t3ir�--�- ��- - 1^- .i�t �x-�� �,� i._-._I�(µI ��_ q! I ,�.,.b •. `,ia, • .. ••�'� , - j '�1-1�i': .�.'�P..!'.1`F:±;.; • • • SEP^PA�oRJ i.VYi V �- p A i _ r ExisriuB fs1rr.✓ B.Idiv 4.1 d/OTE • _ _ • -�' . ;�• ; � ->1: . i ; /J// ' .f'/MO,t T.SB f" �OER CLr49 s'' ,,. .t' •LO '// .e o '� - �;.• ..}v •3, ;' ���' • I •'` • • 1 1 }ter- mac. I::, .a.4CE3: ,, { .'+ ,Y •`:'•, . 1 i1 i( \ - I L gl •i a zz. 1. glil I . ..:....' ' .; r''. .. •'•.• '.ic.f .: ,,. .;. . .. . . , 5- . :3 . ••. " -: . • ,„••• 03 • l i { // 4�E,5\ \ i I !rf , - ':, •y � I\ I 3y ,� 1 1 • 21 37 • 0' y • L1 v cue I cvl I /C SP�CGrS I 4,7erce',0,3f r �y �`� •�I•• I I I I + `��k,nzrnr. ,o so 3f 32 I,..,:e F'---e' n,��fsr•sa- - ,:-%o�,3.r''r ---- -N—x--—.2,.--'' .h --'--ii r .. . ' '• - ---- 1�z.•/~ ' - it, " ^:8.!j- lls.l p �_ 1 -fir�.«aL. r; - _ . - - ;Olt I♦ .�'�rt; • , I`�.6J L • •• • 'SB(L `_-_ RAFF.L L.,ff z • os IC it T'I.JSt k, Y1'.nn-` �.a..•oe.eA, • - • - - ., yB' ZB + .,,,,.. Z!..3 EX+ST^s . 0\ - TO:tl�-'�.4,L,ci,(_�-LOT = Sr_1�:4�-.::j N - •- • - "LUZ>a_4.r:G <LPE-A-1-0T u =b-O; . 517 ?fee P1annfnc 12-1979 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application : SiVaAi, /Pat'Af tr. ict.oso`,94fol;;dl Mug" Lase o pr L :_� t e ��rl � � tir pa r ,i Location: •. $ ye.At, . 94. • Applicant: FIVA "Ark. fAtteee). TO: Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : I`' . fi Police Department A.R. C. MEETING DATE : 6ftaiet Public Works Department E ineering Division P Traffic Engineering Building Division Utilities Engineering Fire Department (Other) : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WR I G FO THE APPLICATION REV EW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON a AT 9:UO A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM. IF Y Ufa DE RTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE T ATTEND THE ARC, PL A E OVIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY b:OU P.M. ON 01f1 o REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : . i4/ ( 61,4 1Alfi, *v. Approved )( Approved with Conditions Not Approved She in10 TEfr 40.•-atelvr 6-2-6O Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date A • . 5 d- VS® Planni 12-197 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEWS SHEET Application: PGc L Q�arrP4frP�..�O-teior 1/e� 42.4.e ere prorl /&'4eJ 4 ,.:: :.i .•,, is At ArgelleAtte Ice Iceptig./e Location : tacks a3 jai Sr °5 3 f AA, Afreoiril Applicant: tw ir-4a1 ilfi rk rfr["e®. TO: ' Arks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : : ,I'`' ,:- f Police Department A.R.C. MEETING DATE : 6fta/40, Public Works Department Engineering Division T .a¢ffic Engineering Building Division Utilities Engineering Fire Department (Other) : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WR I G FO THE APPLICATION REV EW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE MELD ON f / , AT 9:uO A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR. CONFERENCE ROOM. IF Y Uw RTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE Tp A TEND THE ARC PL A E OVTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5:OU P.M. ON fP(I,, IDE THE COMMENTS. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : '8C`'l) K_, Approved X Approved with Conditions Not Approved Lo-i- 11- `Y ect.'d _U (i '_c>>t. %`,ic'0 62i.L, _4t114 .Q.;ae. Zc)`I =4i-- 3 -2 z-e_i?c.e— ..Oc- e ? :' 1 ,,,2�-` 6— .des-c.-C A. el A_./ .-li4 :-: +c-(' i,/ / . 7 6 t-e -,,"<"--, il---,_ (---5--3C-7"C. Signatu `Director or Auth t zed_ tepresefff tive Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : . • Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved _______, Signature of Director or Authorized Representative nate, 5f2Wdg® Planninc 12-1979 • RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Appli cation: •';, itatEelAtt /Aeie irei,r`'�o�S4`� e� ihrov Location:1OPP Lao 5 23 ;N / Ape.fil ,/ 0 Applicant: e � qiti6N/PstrkAtvp.itt rkrdifee .e- TO: Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : ;r•, ;= :' r Police Department A.R.C. MEETING DATE : . Public Works Department Engineering Division Traffic Engineering Building Division Utilities Engineering Fire Department (Other) : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRIJI1 FO THE APPLICATION REVIEW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON ,� O AT J:00 A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM. IF Y U DE RTMENTIDIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE TO A TEND THE ARC, PL A E OVIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5:Ou P.M. ON eI E f�o REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : /,e7L Approved ,/ Approved with Conditions Not Approved Quiet S /t- 1-1 i• t /:2 Foo c�i SS `7' CI G.v T 407'3 A--7cv x), / Si '` /v. Ste` 67- /31,4_ >,6„, Y %a f ,b4/ C' ei- Lug �4, f` L67- ems. ,fiLa'y&/)�, 7 6 ,.--(/ (2. 2 3�� L a-G c j /'145- /i-.cam,7 P �" 4i/= itJ. e C1`- ' Cv /..C746 Signature of Director or Authfv'rze-d—Representative Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : I l,etp-rry Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved /itJ? Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date 5/Z ?,'g® Plannir 12-197S RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application: 1 / - . r SV...OSd•441) dl14401# Loge • . . .Aft Ariplietlitee 6,464 irk Location: o 4 1. W . � ,t• , • 41 Applicant: � � ��t o_ TO: Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : '' : . ,f( Police Department A.R.C. MEETING DATE : @spayee Public corks Department 1 Engineering Division Traffic Engineering Building Division Utilities Engineering Fire Department (Other) : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WR I G FO THE APPLICATION R V EW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD. ON O �D AT :UO A.Me IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM. IF Y U�DE RTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE 'IQ A TEND THE ARC, PL A E fBOVIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5:0U P .M. ON Otniso REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Approved X Approved with Conditions Not Approved v4, sfezi.- -e-L-. .,efn ,,,( Signature of Director or Authorized R�pr sentat ve Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date • 5 Pfanninc 12-1979 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET A p p l i cation : Se&C/A1 " "A eSPwas-6-94 ,41/s se cie properly kettie4 ded- 14,144,t!' AO/Pi ) -46.10 tesima dein Location : ; .' r :® _ .• o/' • v :" • 'A • fit, , . App1icant: F Pth PRIr Mite• �. TO: Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE :150410e 1, Police Department A.R.C. MEETING DATE : 6ftaitet Public Works Department Engineering Division Traffic Engineering Building Division Utilities Engineering Fire Department (Other) : • COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WWI/ FO THE APPLICATION REV EW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON AT 9 : O A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM. IF Y UP DE RTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE TO ATTEND THE ARC, PLiA E UOVIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : POLICE Approved Approved with Conditions xx3flot Approved SEE ATTACHED MEMO LT. . . SON 6/2 '80 ' Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date MEMORANDUM DATE 6-2-80 TO PLANNING DEPARTMENT FROM LT. PERSSONS SUBJECT SPECIAL PERMIT (SP-054-gO) denial At this time I would have to recommend/of the permit application for Parking lots as not enough information has been supplied for parking lots number 2,,p )Number 3 , number 4 and number 5. In regard to parking lots #2 and #3 ,• our specific concerns are paving of the alleyway and allowing parking in the alley. We believe parking in the alleyway may cause a fire hazard (access) to the Renton School District. Also a sight distant problem at North 5th. In regards to parking lots #4 and #5 .we are concerned about excessive traffic in the alleyway as well as the need for improving the alleyway. We also concerned about the engress and egress from the lot as the plans are unclear. Lt. Don P rsson ti , f' '�\`'� \`\5• ,,' e�' n0 l e • • • • • f _ ' I FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE Application No (s ) : SP-050-80 Environmental Checklist No : ECF-572-80 Description of Proposal : To allow use of property located at addresses below for off-site parking Proponent : FIFTH & PARK PLACE CO. Location of Proposal : 400, 430, 533 and 601 Park Avenue North and 538 Pelly Avenue North Lead Agency : PLANNING DEPARTMENT This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on June 11 , 1980 following a presentation by Roger Blaylock of the Planning Department . Oral comments were accepted from: Don Persson - expressed concern about status of the expiration of the 5-year lease on the proposed parking lots. John Webley expressed this as well . Don Persson questioned the use of an alley to North 5th Street . Suggested improvements to alley with "No Parking" stipulated, however . Written comments were also received from Police Department , Building Division, Traffic Engineering and Engineering Division . Incorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings of the ERC on application ECF-572-80 are the following: 1 ) Environmental Checklist Review Sheet , prepared by : Steve Munson, Assistant Planner, dated May 29 , 1980 2) Applications : SP-050-80 3) Recommendations for a declaration of non-significance : Moved by Warren G . Gonnason, concurred John Webley and Don Persson . Acting as the Responsible Official , the ERC has determined this development does not have significant adverse impact on the environment . An EIS is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2 ) (c) . This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a complete environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency . Reasons for declaration of environmental non significance : Declaration of Non-Significance issued due to the fact that the potential adverse impacts generated from off-site parking would not exceed those of on-site parking and that any technical difficulties can be resolved in the Hearing Examiner process. Signatures : 4K;;">455:55:"7 *!:jj q9hn E . Webley , Director r on Y. E 4e en Planning i � 9 Director Warren C . Gonnason , Director �� Public Works Department DATE OF PUBLICATION : June 18, 1980 EXPIRATION OF APPEAL PERIOD : July 2, 1980 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL , RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON JULY 8 , 1980, AT 9 :00 A .M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS : 1 . FIFTH AND PARK PLACE COMPANY, application for special permit to allow use of property located at addresses listed below for off-site parking, File No . SP-050-80 ; property located at 400, 430, 533 and 601 Park Avenue North and 538 Pelly Avenue North . 2 . GREENWOOD MEMORIAL PARK , INC . , application for special permit to allow removal of approximately 50 ,000 cubic yards of earth fill to reduce grade to that of surrounding properties for cemetery expansion, File No . SP-051-80 ; property located on the southwest corner of N. E . 4th Street and Queen Avenue N . E . (extended) . 3 . KATHLEEN I . KELLEHER (KELLEHER SHORT PLAT) , application for approval of 2-lot short plat , File No. 058-80 ; property located at the northeast corner of Burnett Avenue North and North 30th Street . Legal descriptions of files noted above are on file in the Renton Planning Department . ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON JULY 8 , 1980, AT 9 :00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS . PUBLISHED : JUNE 25 , 1980 GORDON Y. ERICKSEN, RENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR CERTIFICATION I , STEVE MUNSON, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST : Subscribed and sworn to before me , a Notary Public , in and for the State of Washington residing in King County , on the 19th day of June , 1980 . SIGNED : „ .0 , ' Yee . THIS • GENERAL LOCATION: AND, OR ADDRESS: Property located at 400, 430, 533 and 601 Park Avenue North and 538 Pelly Avenue North. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: • A detailed legal description is available on file in the, Renton Planning Department I S POSTED TO NOTIFY PROPERTY OWNERS OF . A PUBLIC' HEARING • TO BE HELD IN- CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, MUNICIPAL BUILDING; ON July 8, 1980 BEGINNING AT 9:00 AM taw CONCERNING ITE.- . ■ REZONE Application for special II permit toley��� PERIVH'T' for off-site parking, File No . SP-050-80 • SITE APPRO' ' AL U WAIVER U SHORELINE * MANAGEMENT PERMIT III Declaration of non-signicance, issued by ERC ; direct appeals to the Hearing Exifaminer . • FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL 235 2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION OF /4.1P A. �y ; z THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH. MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 94 235- 2550 09gr D SEP�E1,10 June 19, 1980 Fifth. and Park Place Company 550 S.W. 7th Renton, Washington 98055 Re : NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AND ACCEPTANCE OF APPLICATION For Special Permit to allow use of property located at addresses listed below for off-site parking, File No. SP-050-80, property located at 400, 430, 533 and' 601 Park Avenue North and 538 Pelly Avenue North. Gentlemen: • The Renton Planning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on May 27, 1980. A public hearing before: the City of Renton Hearing Examiner has been set for July 8, 1980 at 9 :00 a.m. Representatives of the applicant are asked to be present. All interested persons are invited to attend the hearing. If you have any further questions, please call the Renton Planning Department , 235-2550 . Very truly yours, Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director By : 175taltANAL Ro er .7 Y B2 lock Associate Planner _cc : _John R .___E_w-ing .& Ass-ociates - - - 622 South Central Avenue Kent , WA 98031 OF R4,, - THE CITY OF RENTON Or �n Z _ y MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 Z 8 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH. MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT t+,: 'O,9�T ,`P� 235-2550 FD sEi' June 12, 1980 , Mr. Eugene Horbach . .Fifth and Park Place Companf 550 S.W. 7th Renton, Washington 98055 RE : LANDSCAPING PLANS, FIFTH & PARK BUILDING / Dear 'Mr. Horbach: The Planning Department has conducted a preliminary review of the landscaping plans which you submitted on May 23rd and have found them to be insufficient to completely evaluate. Landscaping plans submitted to the Planning Department for approval require that the common and botanical names of the plants used are to be shown, the size of the plants, the numbers of plants and the spacing of plants. The plan which you submitted was based upon a site plan ,and does not show any of these requirements . In addition, it should be noted that the Birch trees along Park Avenue North are not acceptable street trees . The official.. street tree on Park Avenue is the London Plane tree which can be spaced on a 30-35 foot center . Not all of the site plan as presented in the plans is functional. Modifications will have to be made to the parking area at the north end of the building. It is estimated that two parking- spaces will be eliminated by the modifications. If you should have any further questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact this department. Very truly yours, . . . _ —_ Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director Ter4e.9: 6610 (114 Roger J. Blaylock , Associate Planner RJB:sh • OF R4 �y z PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISIONCoZ ��LL :#'= .4 0 235-2620 oop �� MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 A • 09gTFo SEPT�M4 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR .! O Q�/ `�f/^-'f/N /yam • 1980 June 5, ZL) O, f 2 Mr. Eugene Horbach r .................. 5th & Park Place Co. , Inc. 550 SW7th Street Renton, WA 98055 Subject: 500 Park Building - Parking Lot Traffic Impact Dear Mr. Horbach: 44 1"_ The auxiliary parking plans that you submitted for the 5th and Park Building pose no major traffic impacts to pedestrian or vehicle movements in this general area of the city. The traffic generated from your operation would enter and exit via the arterial street system which feeds east, west, north and south from this area. Pedestrian traffic has the use of paved concrete sidewalks while traveling to and from the proposed parking lots. � � ` If you have any further questions regarding the above subject, please contact me. Very truly yours, 404,4450.01,4frspr- Paul Lumbert Traffic Operations Engineer PL:ad cc: Vglanning Dept. W. Gpnnason - AFFIDAVIT • I , £Z.(6,Z•4J� oez57Cff , being duly sworn, declare that I am the owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sworn before me this 13 day of /n , 19870 , Notary Public in and for the State of t Washington, residing at . mil; �7/ ¢/ e eA/c , L ::__. ....__Q_____ Nara t Notary-Public) (�ignature of Owner i /o d 1 ,64,..-a--.1 A 01/e i AP, S-60 \ ' illi 7)".. ..._ (Address) (Address) - 7C)--4,1l G .� (City) (State) (Telephone) (FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to zt R),Iiia the foregoing application has been inspected by me and has b et, � 'l1 4 to be thorough and complete in every particular and to conform it 1es�and.- egulations of the Renton Planning Department governini >th(eili .'1,• of It. ch application . 0 Date Rec ved�' , 19 By : \‘/fLANNIA.A`r Renton Planning Dept . 2-73 /4 R -5- _ (12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? YES MAYBE NO (b) Effects on existing parking facilities , or demand 1(71 for new parking? YES MAYBE NO (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? YES MAYBE NO (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation _or movement of people and/or goods? YES MAYBE NO (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? YES MAYBE NO (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles , bicyclists or pedestrians? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon , or ' result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas : (a) Fire protection? C1 YES MAYBE NO (b) Police protection? YES MAYBE NO (c) Schools? YES MAYBE NO(d) Parks or other recreational facilities? V/1 YES MAYBE NO • (e) Maintenance of public facilities ,, including roads? YES MAYBE NO, (f) Other governmental services? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (15) Energy. Will the proposal result in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? YES , MAYBE NO (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: (a) Power or natural gas? 4/ YES MAYBE NO/ (b) Communications systems? t YES MAYBE NO (c) ' Water? YES MAYBE NO 1 • -6- (d) Sewer or septic tanks? YES MAYBE NO (e) Storm water drainage? YES MAYBE NO (f) Solid waste and disposal? • YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding ✓ mental health)? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: • (18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or vieww open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? („' YES MAYBE NO Explanation: • • • (19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impa-ct upon the quality or, quantity of existing recreational opportunities? ' YES MAYBE NO Explanation: • (20) Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an • alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: III. SIGNATURE ' I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla- ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any Willful misrepresentation or willful 1 ck of full disci sure on my part. L- � t..� Proponent• �-`�� ry '� , / sig ed) - (name printed) City of Renton Planning Department • 5-76 ' -3- ' (2) Air. Will the proposal result in: (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air �r quality? YES MAYBE NO (b) The creation of objectionable odors? YES MAYBE NO (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate , either locally or regionally? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: • (3) Water. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in currents , or the course of direction of water movements , in either marine or fresh waters? YES MAYBE NO (b) Changes in absorption rates , drainage patterns , or c / the rate and amount of surface water runoff? i. YES MAYBE NO (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? YES MAYBE NO (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? YES MAYBE NO (e) Discharge into surface waters , or in any alteration surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved- oxygen or turbidity? (./ YES MAYBE NO (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? YES MAYBE NO (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either through direct additions or withdrawals , Or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? YES MAYBE NO (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, detergents , waterborne virus or bacteria, p� or other substances into the ground waters? V YES MAYBE NO (i ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available • for public water supplies? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (4) Flora. Will the proposal result in: (a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass , crops , �. microflora and aquatic plants)? YES MAYBE NO • (b) 'Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? YES- MAYBE NO (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or . in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing P species? I ' YES MAYBE NO (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? YES MAYBE NO • Explanation: -4- (5) Fauna. ,Will the proposal result in : (a) Changes in the diversity of—species , or numbers of any species of fauna - (birds , land animals. including ,reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms , • insects or microfauna)? YES MAYBE NO • J (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or \ endangered species of fauna? YES MAYBE NO (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, • or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? YES MAYBE . NO (d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? YES MAYBE N Explanation: • • (6) Noise.. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? YES MAYBE ' NO Explanation: (7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (8) Land Use.. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? , YES MAYBE NO • Explanation: (9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: y / (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? 10 YES MAYBE NO (b) Depletion of any. nonrenewable natural resource? / F YES. MAYBE N Explanation: (10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil , pesticides , .chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: - . (11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- • bution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: • • j'%) LITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON A 1\\b ENVIROPJMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM 1" • FOR OFFICE USE ONLY • Application No.• -05O -R) Environmental Checklist No. 4017- 7,›2 f� PROPOSED, date: FINAL , date: aDeclaration of Significance El Declaration of Significance Declaration of Non-Significance Declaration of Non-Significance COMMENTS: Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals. The Act also requires that an EIS be prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele- vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with- out unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even thoughcompletion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with- out duplicating paperwork in the future. NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals. Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal . If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM I. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent /7 / ^f '- '� '4l/ k_ � 2. Address and phone numberof Proponent: /- 3. Date Checklist submitted ," J07 © 4. Agency requiring Checklist , ]/11 1 (' /,/ /, • 5. Name of proposal , if applicable: • 6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will' give an accurate • understanding of its scope and nature) : -2- 7. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts , including any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ- mental setting of the proposal ) : 8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal : 9. List of all permits , licenses or government approvals required for the proposal (federal , state and local—including rezones) : • 10. • Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion, or further activity related to , /or connected with this proposal? If yes , explain: /Y.�'D • 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain: 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal ; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe th'e nature of such application form: • II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) (1) Earth. Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? -YES MAYBE NO (b) Dis-ruptions, displacements, compaction or over- covering of the soil? YES MAYBE NO • (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features? ES MAYBE NO ' (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? YES MAYBE NO (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils , either on or off the site? YES MAYBE NO , (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands , or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? YES MM1BE NO Explanation: • - - .. y..,.. ,1, .,....r .,.. i t,:t � — A — - ._ at. ,., n �'a '. m. rvi..y '�fE OirFCii4 „N :.i: . L, . J III. ` John Ft Ewing&Associates civaengwrneers-larndsur rs JN 48901 June 6, 1980 ' Gordon Ericksen < R `+'� Planning Director /0 C7 City of Renton , c\'. �U �� 200 Mill Ave. S cr.K.)'--./� \'"'\'~ Renton, WA 980559 1g�fl I--i1 RE: Special Permit Application (SP-050-80) .V �1' A� Auxiliary Parking t,` �� p i' Dear Gordon: Following is the additional information requested in your letter of June 4, :1980. Hopefully, this information will enable the City's environmental review committee to make a determination of environmental significance/ non-significance. 11* 1. Traffic Analysis + /� We concur with the Renton Public Works Dept. 's findings that Irv" the parking lots will have no significant impact on the overall 10 traffic plan or localized traffic patterns near the individual f I"i parking lots. Of the six parking lots, only Lots 1 and 4 are no + i 4 now being used for parking. These two lots will provide 35 -1'/J)parking stalls, which is 12% of the new parking proposed. s`�'v For a more detailed traffic analysis, see memo from Warren `� Gonnason. Drainage 'Iti°A 11: 114 ' Drainage plans have been submitted to the Renton Public Works Dept. for their review and approval. Restrictor manholes and oil-water separators have been provided in the parking lots to insure that pollutants do not enter the city's storm drain system and that storm water will not run off the parking lots at a greater rate than before development. 3. Land Use Following is a summary of the of the impact upon land use adja t to the proposed parking lots: , 1 ceti Lot 1 had a somewhat run-down house and garage on it which have since been removed. The property around the lot is ' zoned B-1 and is being used as commercial property. Parking on Lot 1 would have no significant-impact on land--- - - - - use of adjacent property. r-s—+ r.. r-_—A--1 ei,_..a 1AI.,.—L:_..4..— (C7na1 IDr \pca_,c,r_7n F , .,,, ,, , _.. t„, -,,,,,, • .,'"t' IL . , s. .' Gordon Ericksen " June 6, 1980 u. Page 2 Lo s.. V2 ' , Lot 2 is presently partially paved and partially gravelled (' ';x, and is being used for parking. Adjacent land is zoned B-1 f and is being used as commercial property. The property Aj 2 )., to the north is used for manufacturing (Circus-Circus 4 //' i -.4-.4 1' 4. Hydroplane Construction) and to the east for school equip- (/�/ ' 41 ment maintenance and bus parking. Parking on Lot 2 will ( have no significant impact on land use of adjacent property.• I; • Lot3 Lot 3 is presently gravelled and is being used for parking. � _ ft. zi `Adjacent land is zoned B-1. The property to The southis I„ being used commercially by the State of Washington for a i / half-way house. The property to the east is being used VI for school equipment maintenance and bus parking. The ,�'. J property to the north is being used as a single-family V;(3),...) residence. Parking on Lot 3 will have no significant impact on land ii use of the property to the south or to the east and in the Ir long run will not impact the use of the property to the north since the property will be used commercially in the future. f There will undoubtedly be some short-term impact on the however, this impact will be y property to the north; p minimized by a five-foot landscape buffer between Lot 3 and the property to the north. Lot 4,,,,------ 7--Lot 4 had a run-down house on it which has been removed. /� Adjacent property is zoned B-1. The property to the north /1I V" is being used commercially as an automotive repair shop; the property to the south is being used as a single-family residence. Parking on Lot 4 will have no significant impact on the land use of the property to the north and in the long run will not impact the use of the property to the south since the property will be used commercially in the future. There will be some short-term impact on the property to the south; `However, this impact will be minimized by a five-foot „ lan cas pe duffer on the south side of Lot 4. Lotrb Lot 5 is presently being used commercially by the Ci ef- Renton Water Dept. Adjacent property is zoned an s lc.i;lT•` commercially. Parking on Lot 5 will have no si 'i ''t1 Ci7 '` impact on adjacent land use. ((/ . ck\,t�..= • \U �9tiQ I-\i * , , ,.y f v. Gordon Ericksen June 6,, 1980 Page 3 Lot 6 Lot 6 is presently being used for parking and RV storage. Adjacent property is the City of Renton "Mother's Park". The use of this lot is not being changed so no significant impact is anticipated in the land use of the adjacent property. L7andscaping The proposed landscaping will provide a visual buffer between 4 public roads and the parking lots and between abutting residences and the parking lots. The landscaping will soften the appearance of the asphalt lots and will help to give the lots a more pleasing appearance than they now have. 5. Guidelines 6. 1 Project Description, Objectives, & Needs a. The project consists of minor grading and paving of six lots and an alley to provide parking for a new office building being constructed at N 5th St. and Park Ave. N. Storm drainage facilities and landscaping will be provided per City of Renton ordinances. b. Short- and long-range objectives of the project are to provide adequate parking for the building. c. The parking lots are needed to meet the parking requirements for the building as defined by City (-- of Renton ordinance. PPrAilvvr- d. The parking lots will be constructed immediately upon approval of the plans by the City of Renton ` and will be used for parking for the forseeable future. All leased lots have minimum five-year leases. P.Copies of the leases will be provided by the owner. 6.2 Geographic Area a. The enclosed plans (two sheets) show the location \ of the proposed parking lots. b. All of the parking lots are zoned B-1, Commercial. c. Surrounding land use is shown on the enclosed - __._ plans. � . T' � 1 " ' -: d. Public utility services are available to the 4 `'' ,J/� parking lots. There is no storm system in Park /Q C�' '\' •, Ave. so the storm drainage for Lot 3 will be piped ;i� c ;= -\-3' -Z. to the storm line in 5th St. This line will be installed i' — ,` in the alley so traffic on Park will not be affected. ,aptAi�;NWG.� 0 Gordon Ericksen June 6, 1980 Page 4 . 6. 3 Description of the Environment a Land use has been explained in detail in Item 3 • above. In summary, the land use of the project site and surrounding site would not significantly change if the project is implemented. If the project is not implemented, the lots would,.most , likely be put to a commercial use permitted under the B-1 zoning. b There would be no significant impact on fish and wildlife, vegetation, geology and soils, mineral resources, air and water quality, water resources, historic or archeological resources, or trans- portation whether or not.the project, is implemented. 6 The Environmental Impact of the Proposed Action No significant environmental impact is anticipated due /IVI to the construction of the parking lots. There will be a visual imzact created by the parking lots. Lots 1 and- 4 have houses on them now but the houses are in a run-down condition and the construction of the parking lots along with the landscape buffer will improve the appearance of the. lots. . . . 5 Mitigation of Identified Environmental Impacts Landscape buffers have been provided between public roads and the parking lots and between Lots 3 and 4 and adjacent residential property to soften the visual impact of the paved lots. .6 Alternatives to the Proposed Action No alternatives to the parking lot construction are rit '-rMAILj under consideration at this time. There is not sufficient space for parking on the build site; any alternative would require offsite q parking away from the building I.'" t to meet the city requirements for parking. y If;you have any questions on the additional information provided, please give me a call. We want to have a complete submittal so that the environmental review committee will be able to make a determination of environmental significance/non-significance. Verytrulyours ",�,. E' Y { �1�1•0/ JOHN R. EWING & ASSOCIATES /� G ( ` .! D !I.. ' . La, Anie.„4„ -106C° FA Shupe Holmberg, P.E. U 9 :, �. �,,. SH:mu ,� �A, , { enc ,'' . :NI N G 5)�4%: NCTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a final declaration of non-significance for the following projects : 1 . FIFTH AND PARK PLACE COMPANY (ECF-572-80) , application for special permit to allow use of property located at addresses listed below for off-site parking , file SP-050-80 ; property located at 400, 430 , 533 and 601 Park Avenue North and 538 Pelly Avenue North. 2 . GREENWOOD MEMORIAL PARK , INC . (ECF-573-80) , application for special permit to allow removal of approximately 50 ,000 cubic yards of earth fill to reduce grade to that of surrounding properties for cemetery expansion , file SP-051-80 ; property located on the southwest corner of N.E . 4th Street and Queen Avenue N .E . (extended) . Further information regarding this action is available in the Planning Department , Municipal Building, Renton , Washington, 235-2550 . Any appeal of ERC action must be filed with the Hearing Examiner by July 2 , 1980. Published : June 18 , 1980 i ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE JUNE 11 , 1980 AGENDA COMMENCING AT 10 :00 A.M. : THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM 1 . OLD BUSINESS : SP-050-80 FIFTH AND 'PARK PLACE CO. , INC. ECF-572-80 Application for special permit to allow use of property located at following addresses for parking : 400, 430, 533 , and 601 Park Avenue North and 538 Pelly Avenue North 2 . NEW BUSINESS : SP-051-80 GREENWOOD MEMORIAL PARK ECF-573-80 Application for special permit to allow removal of approximately 50 , 000 cubic yards of earth material to provide for expansion of an existing cemetery ; property located on the southwest corner of N .E . 4th St . and Queen Ave. N .E . (extended) SA-053-80 JACK A. BENAROYA COMPANY ECF-574-80 Application for site approval to allow conversion of Building #4 of the Benaroya Business Park from warehousing to office use (approximately 68,400 sq . ft . ) ; property located in the vicinity of 1012 S .W. 41st Street . J RE John R.Ewing >J AssociatEs civil EnginEErs-land surveyors JN 48901 June 6, 1980 Gordon Ericksen / Planning Director Q , City of Renton �,` i 200 Mill Ave. S Renton, WA 98055 �� 9 1°a0 ( Lij RE: S ecial Permit A lication (SP-050-80) J 'C� t�,. � } P PP q A. 4/ Auxiliary Parking q Q;,, Dear Gordon: Following is the additional information requested in your letter of June 4, .1980. Hopefully, this information will enable the City's environmental review committee to make a determination of environmental significance/ non-significance. 1. Traffic Analysis We concur with the Renton Public Works Dept. 's findings that the parking lots will have no significant impact on the overall traffic plan or localized traffic patterns near the individual parking lots. Of the six parking lots, only Lots 1 and 4 are not now being used for parking. These two lots will provide 35 parking stalls, which is 12% of the new parking proposed. For a more detailed traffic analysis, see memo from Warren Gonna s on. 2. Drainage Drainage plans have been submitted to the Renton Public Works Dept. for their review and approval. Restrictor manholes and oil-water separators have been provided in the parking lots to insure that pollutants do not enter the city's storm drain system and that storm water will not run off the parking lots at a greater rate than before development. 3. Land Use Following is a summary of the of the impact upon land use adjacent to the proposed parking lots: Lot l Lot 1 had a somewhat run-down house and garage on it which have since been removed. The property around the lot is zoned B-1 and is being used as commercial property. Parking on Lot 1 would have no significant impact on land use of adjacent property. 622 So.CEntral• KEnt,Washington 98031•(206)852-6633 T Gordon Ericksen June 6, 1980 Page 2 Lot 2 Lot 2 is presently partially paved and partially gravelled and is being used for parking. Adjacent land is zoned B-1 and is being used as commercial property. The property to the north is used for manufacturing (Circus-Circus Hydroplane Construction) and to the east for school equip- ment maintenance and bus parking. Parking on Lot 2 will have no significant impact on land use of adjacent property. Lot 3 Lot 3 is presently gravelled and is being used for parking. Adjacent land is zoned B-1. The property to the south is being used commercially by the State of Washington for a half-way house. The property to the east is being used for school equipment maintenance and bus parking. The property to the north is being used as a single-family residence. Parking on Lot 3 will have no significant impact on land use of the property to the south or to the east and in the long run will not impact the use of the property to the north since the property will be used commercially in the future. There will undoubtedly be some short-term impact on the property to the north; however, this impact will be minimized by a five-foot landscape buffer between Lot 3 ,and the property to the north. Lot 4 Lot 4 had a run-down house on it which has been removed. Adjacent property is zoned B-1. The property to the north is being used commercially as an automotive repair shop; the property to the south is being used as a single-family residence. Parking on Lot 4 will have no significant impact on the land use of the property to the north and in the long run will not impact the use of the property to the south since the property will be used commercially in the future. There will be some short-term impact on the property to the south; however, this impact will be minimized by a five-foot landscape buffer on the south side of Lot 4. Lot 5 Lot 5 is presently being used commercially by the Ci,'�•o --` Renton Water Dept. property is zoned ai s P Adjacentp P Y , commercially. Parking on Lot 5 will have no si 1 n t impact on adjacent land use. .� Vg-v 9 19��• G SA a !'lgN ' G N Gordon Ericksen June 6, 1980 Page 3 Loth Lot 6 is presently being used for parking and RV storage. Adjacent property is the City of Renton "Mother's Park". The use of this lot is not being changed so no significant impact is anticipated in the land use of the adjacent property. 4. Landscaping The proposed landscaping will provide a visual buffer between public roads and the parking lots and between abutting residences and the parking lots. The landscaping will soften the appearance of the asphalt lots and will help to give the lots a more pleasing appearance than they now have. 5. Guideline s 6. 1 Project Description, Objectives, & Needs a. The project consists of minor grading and paving of six lots and an alley to provide parking for a new office building being constructed at N 5th St. and Park Ave. N. Storm drainage facilities and landscaping will be provided per City of Renton ordinances. b. Short- and long-range objectives of the project are to provide adequate parking for the building. c. The parking lots are needed to meet the parking requirements for the building as defined by City of Renton ordinance. d. The parking lots will be constructed immediately upon approval of the plans by the City of Renton and will be used for parking for the for seeable future. All leased lots have minimum five-year leases. Copies of the leases will be provided by the owne r. 6.2 Geographic Area a. The enclosed plans (two sheets) show the location of the proposed parking lots. b. All of the parking lots are zoned B-1, Commercial. c. Surrounding land use is shown on the enclosed plans. To d. Public utility services are available to the � parking lots. There is no storm system in Park � ® ��\' Ave. so the storm drainage for Lot 3 will be piped ���� ��' to the storm line in 5th St. This line will be installed in the alley so traffic on Park will not be affected. A G off- A�ALANNII`I :. Gordon Ericksen June 6, 1980 Page 4 6. 3 Description of the Environment a. Land use has been explained in detail in Item 3 above. In summary, the land use of the project site and surrounding site would not significantly change if the project is implemented. If the project is not implemented, the lots would':most likely be put to a commercial use permitted under the B-1 zoning. b. There would be no significant impact on fish and wildlife, vegetation, geology and soils, mineral resources, air and water quality, water resources, historic or archeological resources, or trans- portation whether or not the ,project, is implemented. 6.4 The Environmental Impact of the Proposed Action No significant environmental impact is anticipated due to the construction of the parking lots. There will be a visual impact created by the parking lots. Lots 1 and 4 have houses on them now but the houses are in a run-down condition and the construction of the parking lots along with the landscape buffer will improve the appearance of the, Lots,., 6. 5 Mitigation of Identified Environmental Impacts Landscape buffers have been provided between public roads and the parking lots and between Lots 3 and 4 and adjacent residential property to soften the visual impact of the paved lots. 6. 6 Alternatives to the Proposed Action No alternatives to the parking lot construction are under consideration at this time. There is not sufficient space for parking on the building site; any alternative would require offsite parking away from the building to meet the city requirements for parking. If you have any questions on the additional information provided, please give me a call. We want to have a complete submittal so that the environmental review committee will be able to make a determination of environmental significance/non-significance. Very truly yours, JOHN R. EWING & ASSOCIATESs. � D t�4/ ,, \ Shupe Holmberg, P.E. SH:mu A� • V 11� �, enc NI N Ge�// cc: Gene Horbach �_. --- J RE John R.Ewing >J AssociatEs civil EnginEErs-land survEgors JN 48901 June 6, 1980 RE Roger Blaylock City of Renton Planning Dept. (j 9 10 , 200 Mill Ave. S Jv� Renton, WA 98055 \\ • RE: Special Permit Application SP-050-80 C44fv NG VC Q� Auxiliary Parking Dear Roger: In response to your letter of June 4, 1980 regarding design problems in the layout of the proposed parking lots for the 500 Building, we have made some revisions in the plans and offer the following comments. Lotl A five-foot landscape buffer was added between the curb cuts, as requested, which reduces the number of stalls to 18 in Lot 1. Lot 2 Although Lot 2 is more than 500 feet from the building, there is a contiguous ownership (alley) from N 5th St. to Lot 2. It appears that Mr. Horbach will have to wait for the Hearing Examiner to determine if this lot meets the criteria for auxiliary parking. There are no accesses on the east side of Lot 2. These are "turnouts" for maneuvering room for the three stalls along the easterly side of Lot 2. Although the turnouts don't provide a lot of maneuvering room (three feet), with 20-foot stalls and the 24-foot driving lane provided, the end stalls will function with no turnout at all. The Circus-Circus building has its own parking. Lot 2 is not a joint-use lot for Circus-Circus. All 50 parking stalls in Lot 2 are functional. Lot 3 Lot 3 has been revised to 7CP' angle parking with a one-way access. This will provide room for a five-foot landscape buffer between Lot 3 and the residential lot to the north. The lot to the south is no longer used as a residence but is leased by the State as a half-way house. This would seem tome to be a commercial use of the property. We do have a one-foot buffer between Lot 3 and the half-way house property. A hedge or screening fence could be installed in this area if required. 622 So.CEntral• KEnt,Washington 98031•(206)852-6633 1 0 P Roger Blaylock June 6, 1980 Page 2 Again, the parking for the half-way house is provided on its lot; Lot 3 is not a joint-use parking lot. With the revised parking plan, Lot 3 has ten parking stalls. Lot 4 Lot 4 has been revised to provide a five-foot buffer between it and the residential lot to the south. The parking layout was revised, resulting in an increase in the number of stalls on Lot 4 to 17. Lot 5 The landscaping area in the central aisle was moved to the northwest corner as requested and we called for the alley to be paved. The number of parking stalls in Lot 5 remains at 71. Lot 6 Maneuvering areas were added to Lot 6; the number of functional parking stalls remains at 54 for Lot 6. Assuming that the number of stalls on the building site is reduced to 48, the total number of stalls provided is 288, which is more than the 270 required. Twenty of the stalls are provided in the alley; however, this shouldn't be a problem since these stalls afe 9' x 23' . As we discussed on the phone, Nick Horn from our office will be in Monday morning (June 9) at 8:30 to meet with you regarding the landscaping plan for the parking lots. The landscape plan is laid out on a blueprint but I would like Nick to review it with your office before we finalize it. If you have any further questions regarding the parking lots, please give me a call. Very truly yours, JOHN R. EWING & ASSOCIATES Shupe Holmberg, .E. E ®� �• 1�1'�: SH:mu cc: Gene Horbach 3\0 �g'vN1NG ore , OF R4, THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON.WASH.98055 Z o o BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT .0 June 4, 1980 235- 2550 0 Mr . Eugene Hotbach 5th and Park Place Company, Inc . 550 S .W. 7th Renton, Washington 98055 RE : SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICATION (SP-050-80) AUXILLIARY PARKING Dear Mr . Horbach: On June 4, 1980, the City ' s Environmental Review Committee discussed your proposed plan for auxiliary parking associated with the 5th and Park Building located at the southeast corner of that intersection . At that time it was determined • that the following additional information will be required prior to the determination of environmental significance/non- significance : (1) TRAFFIC ANALYSIS = Please provide a comprehensive circulation plan for the subject six-block area indicating its total impact . Particular attention should be given to pedestrian and vehicular traffic in the vicinity and access to the individual parking lots . (2) DRAINAGE - Submit an overall drainage plan with particular emphasis given to its impact on the existing Park Street storm drainage system. (3) LAND USES - Provide a summary of the resultant impacts upon land uses adjacent to the proposed parking lots. (4) LANDSCAPING - Indicate how the proposed planting is going to provide aesthetic improvement of the parking area and buffer adjacent land uses. (5 ) GUIDELINES (Attached) - Please provide the information outlined in Section 6.0-6 .6. If you have further questions regarding this matter , please contact this office. Very truly yours, Gordon Y. Ericksen • Planning Director • .d•ek&e t.del v!f Steve Munson Assistant Planner OF vP CD THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 Z :r o o BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR ® PLANNING DEPARTMENT 9A ccr 235- 2550 0,9gT�0 sEP-0-43 June 4, 1980 Mr . Eugene Horbach 5th and Park Place Company, Inc . 550 S .W. 7th Renton, Washington 98055 RE : SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICATION SP-050-80 , AUXILIARY PARKING Dear Mr . Horbach : The application for a special permit has been reviewed by the department staff. In accordance with the Parking & Loading Ordinance , there are some design errors in the project . Lot #1 is considered as part of the development site and not considered under the special permit . However, it does not meet Section 4-2204 (8) (B) (2) of the Parking & Loading Ordinance in providing landscaping adjacent to the public right-of-way . A 5-foot wide landscaping island will have to be provided between the two curb cuts proposed , thus making the total available parking in Lot #1 appear to be 18 spaces . Out of the other 50 parking spaces provided adjacent to the. building, only 48 are useable with some. design modifications at the northeast corner of the building. Thus , the total on-site parking is estimated to be 66 spaces . LOT #2 Parking Lot #2 appears not to meet the design criteria for auxiliary parking lots in that it is more than 500 ' from the southern property boundary of the building . The Hearing Examiner will have to determine if it meets the criteria of an auxiliary parking lot . In addition, the accesses on the eastern side of the proposed lot do not appear to connect directly onto a street . If there are access easements across the adjacent parcel to the west then those easements will have to be documented. The 4 -spaces adjacent to the eastern property line are not functional . They do not provide enough area for the automobiles to manuever . Therefore , the functional use of the parking lot is cut down to a maximum of 46 parking spaces . The proposed parking lot is immediately south of the Circus-Circus Building, an area used for parking for that facility lies on the south side of the building . Letter to Eugene Horbach June 4, 1980 Page -2- Based upon on-site inspections , it would appear that the construction of the parking lot will diminish this area evidently used for parking by Circus-Circus and the actual operation of the building. Plans should be submitted indicating the use of the Circus-Circus building and the parking required for that use to assure the City that the minimum parking required for the building under the Parking & Loading Ordinance is met and that parking Lot #2 is not removing some of the required parking from that facility . If it is considered to use parking Lot #2 as a joint parking lot, the evaluation of the function of the lot will have to be reconsidered . LOT #3 Parking Lot #3 does not meet the minimum aisle width required for 90° parking under Section 4-2206( 1 ) (C) (2 ) (a) of the Parking & Loading Ordinance . Therefore , the proposed 11 spaces cannot be utilized without obtaining a variance . The Board of Adjustment will not be able to consider the variance until their regular meeting on July 23rd. Applications would have to be submitted by Tuesday, June 24th (at the latest) to the Building Division of the Public Works Department . There are residences on both sides of proposed parking Lot #3 . This would require a minimum 5-foot landscaping * strip along with the standard 20-foot long parking stalls and the 24-foot wide aisle would necessitate a minimum width of 54 feet . The proposed lot is only 45 feet in width. Under Section 4-2204(6 ) (6) (1) of the Parking & Loading Ordinance , the Planning Department may allow a minimum 42" high screening fence in lieu of the landscaping upon proper application for good cause shown. In most cases the Planning Department has only considered the use of a combination of fencing along with landscaping . In this case there is not enough space to. construct a fence on both sides of the proposed lot . Normally, 3 feet of landscaping and the 42" high fence is utilized instead of the 5 feet of landscaping. If this was allowed by the Planning Department , the lot would have to be 50 feet wide. Therefore , the only alternative would be to seek a variance from the aisle width and the stall length. In addition , there is a question as to the required parking for the State of Washington halfway house . Parking Lot #3 appears to take away the parking that is presently used by the halfway house and there has to be clarification as to whether the parking was required as a condition of approval of the halfway house . Letter to Eugene Horbach June 4, 1980 Page -3- ALLEY PARKING On the design plans you ' ve shown an existing alley running between North 5th and North 4th Streets . The parking spaces provided at the northern end of this vacated alley adjacent to North 5th Street are shown accessing onto school property . It will be necessary for you to present documentation that you have access over the school property by either easement or lease from the school district , otherwise those parking spaces cannot be counted . The parallel parking spaces do not meet the dimensional requirement of Section 4-2206(1 ) (B) of the Parking & Loading Ordinance . Those spaces must be a minimum of 9 x 23 feet . They are shown on the plans at 8 x 22 feet . In addition, all of the uses on the eastern half of the block along the alley parking will have to be delineated to determine if a landscaping buffer is required according to Section 4-2204(8) (b ) (1 ) . LOT #4 Parking Lot #4. has a single family residence located on the south side of the proposed lot . Under Section 4-2204 (8 ) (B) (1 ) a minimum 5-foot wide landscaping strip shall be provided adjacent to the residential use . Modification of the design will eliminate 4 of the parking spaces along the alley. LOT #5 Parking Lot #5 appears to comply with the requirements of the Parking & Loading Ordinance . However, the alley which runs between Park Avenue North and Pelly Avenue North south of Gary ' s Automotive and the proposed lot would have to be improved by the applicant to utilize the access onto it . The landscaping shown on the southern boundary of proposed Lot #5 in the central aisle should • be moved to the northwest corner of the site to provide more screening . This will not lower the number of parking spaces useable on the site . LOT #6 Parking Lot #6 complies with the requirements of the Parking & Loading Ordinance; however, the 4 western-most parking stalls do not appear functional from a manuevering point of view. Therefore , the number of stalls would . be reduced by 4 to a total number of- 50 parking spaces . Letter to Eugene Horbach June 4, 1980 Page -4- In summary, the Fifth and Park Building will require approxi- mately 270 parking spaces based on 54,000 square feet of - useable office space . The entire building is approximately 66 ,000 square feet and 12 ,000 has been eliminated for the stairways in the building . Our preliminary review of the proposed special permit suggests that only 260 can be provided on the proposed lot . Seventeen of those spaces are questionable because they are located within an alley. Landscaping plans have not been submitted showing how these projects will be screened from adjacent uses. This is critical in determining the environmental impact of the project and determining whether the special permit should be issued. In addition, we have not received any information on whether the lots have been purchased and which lots are leased. In the case of leases , we must be assured that a sufficient time period (at least 5 years ) is available to provide parking for the structure . Therefore , we need a copy of the leases attached to the application . If you should have any further questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact this department . Very truly yours , Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director Wel41-&-q Roger J . Blaylock , Associate Planner • RJB ;sh ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE JUNE 4, 1980 AGENDA COMMENCING AT 10 : 00 A.M. : THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM 1 . NEW BUSINESS : R-048-80 ECF-570-80 RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT Application for rezone from G-7200 to R-3 for the purpose of future multiple family development ; property located on the east side of Benson Road South south of S.W. 23rd Street R-049-80 McCASLIN, JOEPETE ECF-571-80 Application for rezone from G to SR-1 to permit short subdivision of subject site into two lots ; property located on the west side of Union Ave. N.E . approximately 1820 feet south of N .E . 4th Street SP-050-80 FIFTH AND PARK PLACE C0.1_ INC . ECF-572-80 Application for special permit to allow use of property located at following addresses for parking : 400, 430 , 533, and 601 Park Avenue North and 538 Pelly Avenue North Date circulated : 647i2 fg® Comments due : ‘Aczele3 ENIVIROMIMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - 57o? - So APPLICATION No (s ) . P- j. Q-8D PROPONENT: ic"-P Ark Ph? c; PROJECT TITLE : ,Sper'aMeaPtile- Brief Description of Project : bo a ltp�, vse O� ��r� e, ber.�v (22 o 16 Ca i�d ss _L_., �6 h a '('--s 7, le ‘ Sf LOCATION : VOO/j(C ke./�/ 930A, Ave.R., S13/1,1 Af o /j ka/fl .g S-: SITE AREA : ej7 ,ADD BUILDING AREA (gross) ----- ��l1X ' f DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : ---- IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2•) Direct/Indirect air quality : vr..0 /....".....- 3) Water & water courses : 4) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : _ / . 6) Noise : V 7) Light & glare : 8) Land Use ; north: east : (Pow IlaiLw"'-1 . south: west : ,t Land use conflicts : Lors 30 �f / 721C(ye,Uuf -••Pt�'P7- f ,e-el,.4Q114 View obstruction : A/onr� 9). Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 1.--------' 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14) Public services : f/-^ 15 ) Energy : (� 16 ) .Utilities: L.-------' 17) Human health : 18) Aesthetics : �` 19 ) Recreation : 20) Archeology/history : • • COMMENTS : �! /� /� f NtriasokeS ntt'lt' ale. f7^-e %NCI•eeSSE'r -0 .0 # /4 sly (4 ay/ryflIac 4. Ia-J$ ,' %r1 A e gze-helip< e2rc ? 'e colt e ern$ . Recommendation : DNSI_ DOS More Information Reviewed by :$'Ve /V/U,tS0e7 Title : )5.5esia...Y ,E Knr'` Date : s�����o FORM: ERC-06 CITY OF RENTON } �tNTQiv APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT FOR OFFICE USE ONLY �j File No.. SP-/1� _10 `��6 I �/ Date Rec d. ^ n� W(7^_ >' Application Fee $ �� Receipt No . /3771 Or Environmental Review Fee $ 0(/' APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH,!-6 : _ 1. Name t'l'i// t //? d(' .;/Ce_ eC I4' ��;��'' ✓ (' Phone Address 'S-C? �c iv 7)44 2. • Property location /cc 2,c i Pet A/Cc icy 4(,?1-; N '�C i/ic 4l ' 6>3";7,/.,�i�4. .c y rn' ,v (CI 7'6a2,c' ' 3. Legal description (attach additional sheet if necessary) ,Srr i 7T%�cr' /�1Gt�iS • 4 . Number of acres •or square feet Present Zoning X-/ 5 . What do you propose to develop on this property? P1/L,' IR.:.44 700 C-r-t)cC Z /' /4'e: ,qi gel g77e4-- 19L c ,CJ 1�"4/ !,•�Si✓ 6. The following information shall be submitted with this application : A. Site and access plan (include setbacks , Scale existing structures , easements , and other . factors limiting development) 1" = 10 ' or 20 ' B. Parking, landscaping and screening plan 1" = 10 ' C. Vicinity map (include land use and zoning on adjacent parcels) 1" = 200 ' to 800 ' D. Building height and area (existing and proposed) E. A special permit required by the Renton Mining , Excavation and Grading Ordinance shall submit the information listed in Section 4-2307.5 in addition to the above. 7. LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER'S ACTION: Date Approved Date Denied Date Appealed • Appeal Action Remarks • Planning Dept. 1-77 -0- %fy 'p- 7-'�fA'-< c�v , 75 4-4)W i -� - rlp —s�i �— d- / Property Address S.W. Coi-rier of Pelly St. & 6th Avenue l In connection with that certain Earnest Money Receipt and Agreement dated April 7, 1980 P covering the purchase and sale of the following described property: Lots 14 to 16, inclusive, and the North 30 feet of Lot 17; ALSO the West 17.5 feet c of the following described'property: The North 30 feet of Lot 10 and Lots 11 to 13, s. inclusive; BIER WITH the vacated alley adjacent thereto, all in Block 10, renton Farm Plat, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 10 of Plats, page 97, in King County, Washington; EXCEPT that portion deeded to the City of Renton by deed recorded under King County Recording No. 7307090450. _ s .. 60f )9 e . 9L/ v€7ei--/ THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 89 TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M. s IN KING COUNTY , WASHINGTON . DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS, BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE WEST LINE OF PARK STREET 'WITH THE NORTH LINE OF 6TH AVENUE NORTH; THENCE NORTH- ALONG SAID WEST LINE , ' 185 FEET ; THENCE WEST 107. 5 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 185 FEET ; THENCE EAST 107.5 FEET TO BEGINNING., . - EXCEPT THAT PORT ION CONVEYED. ,TO. THE ,C:I TY- OF..-RENTON ..BY DEED RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR' S FILE NO.. -. 720609•0448 • xe7s; i e �tifd '/ �3e.c' " - /.; ;'ti'TCA.7 ,P/k ,9T t'�QQ /Jcs:�:•4>z Y • .�G�/ vim" ,?4:-Cc•4--- ,2 ,Ster?.?.7o ei'11/4L l'27i c/J•- .11.9Swf ' N0,'7y /o t -& /DT e ��, ; ' /-L;-.: pr' A0,j". • �5 L.C' /e .tic,},_ i,' J� i��7 .� �,�'Cc• - �S`� 'c E/' • /,�?/� l L.th._ . d�,� rAi /.t�6 � 4'6'i • 4/9- / - 'n+ �,'•R I . . — -.t, dui _ — ''i:. R+ :y T .E _ FZ, _ ,t i+. :3+.. t. 1'-:\iP-'' . . O a r a: . ak:� r ct�: - . W e •• P — .N1