Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
LUA89-087
op 8�^� o POLICY DEVELOPMENT 2nmt N0 Mill Avenue SouthAU Renton, Washington 98055 o4 �� / � ~ �"u x�I^,� - IWO, LEFr no B David Gra ey 1425 S Pu t Dr #I-3 Renton W 98055 CRA 25 24222/4 71 07/22/89 NOTIFY SENDER OF NEN ADDRESG / �RACEY 700 AVON 3-K HALLINCFORD PA 19886 • NOTICE OF PENDING SITE PLAN APPROVAL RENTON, WASHINGTON i • A Site Plan Application has been filed and accepted with the Planning Division of the Community Development Department. The following briefly describes the-application . and the necessary Public Approvals. • DESCRIPTION: CITY LIGHTS APARTMENTS ECF; SA-087-89 Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 70 unit apartment complex to be located on a - - vacant 3.3 acre R-3, Residential_Multi-Family, zoned-parcel. (Note: Density-level has - been adjusted for greenbelt on-site.) . • . GENERAL LOCATION: East side of Benson Road between Puget Drive and. South 26th Street. PUBLIC APPROVALS: o Environmental Review o Site Plan Approval • o Building Permit Approval The application can be reviewed at the Planning Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval. For further, information on the application or dates of final action by the City, please contact the Planning Division at 235-2550. • --_ II i-------f , — . ' J. - 1 • '• I • .[NMa OLSH 1 ``. r- FOILAL_NION 1 SLIMSC• t i / ;`;1 . CHOOL I jar1 +,..____---, � I 1 ----:;;;;;.1 r \". \ 1 1 v I Manna PAPIPGIUM I ,1 C3 .,�_ r r • I W ;ll i--_-- , ///////V///, - ,;_- I > I C3 rF 1 '■ / PROJECT SITE I I i `-` —' I G 1 V'-----_'�� 1•`; 1 + 0`I R// 1•/11...7Yt.MH CMMCN 1-. 3r ,i-- --11---,„ ... • ��"`-, i , ----� +I , fin_-- '��' ..... v..„...,.,............ 7 , a. \'t •. ' . . . . :. .. . ,.. . . . ______ _ . • . . , ' . , . , . . • , ;..1 • I , . . . '• .- . ' , . . .,"..:‘ ,. %'' ' .,:1 • ' 1 . 1 •/./ ." : I. , t•'.k.--17-7-:"7-:-543.',..',"ier,•...ri-,,,,...,,,,i,.--,--•:, ".‘ I-- ,L....,,- '•:, , • ! . , ' • *\.•-`\ \ •• / i• : 1 : !.' . •./• 3-...;ir• - - ).. i fr.?..oi. • -. ) .'.;‘,.. ,•-• , - . . . . . . ..,.._......./ .. s v • • ) • i- r ; - . \\•• ...* .- 1\ , . .; ..___L_ ' 1 , /._- _.. '. 1 . - / i'l••% )\\' • 1 -e-1- * '‘ii . • • , • / • • . • -,\ ,. g_ . , . .. • , 6, o ° a' it''' ° r ' . •. \ ! 1 - • \ - a r* '''' . • -I . / . ' "a(,/\ .• ..• Ti> • c ts' c • • • . . . 0 c , . . \ i'1. 't ! A.,.. • i':44' iiik ' , . \i")::: . .. ' • ,., % . k .2..1 . t • „.. r. .... =. • Prikliii.® • - .. , • . „, : ''', 1 ..--, .. .. • 0 • l cc, Ie. _ i , 1 \• \I I ' „I . \ • • \ F', t .'', 10 C?I 1 t le bit , 0% 0 ,..- ,:a I Ilk C • .e % 'di:c) ° , ) 0 • : 0.. \ \- dtt -11.1", II; 0 0 8 • 11 111°% ti © ,., i i \ ..'; •• ii, 0 6 ' . A\ Ir• I ; S "r1(' • - O. . (ft. t; . • ic,• • !, .„ , . il 1 • - - . •\.-4 4 ' 't \ • 11 Y. O' ° bL 7- ° I Oj ' I 0 .0 . ..., ri?. Tr- ..,. Ire . Ls, , . . . . . .% 0• ,1 . a (4 : . • • . 1 E; : , i • 1 7: • . 1;,• d19 \ \.,\ V: ar-. v."- :.. 0 , • • . I __-- ; mg 0 li. ; S I , 1 ; • .' \ 0 611 .' 1 • I - -_ ee t-.. % , ; . - 0 , , , 0 • . , i - .., ,. . ...,-.1 ,. _ _ .. L . , 00 4 ; I . --. • 1 ; , • i ' , ... . .6, \ .\ ./. \--- --._ ____ i off : 1 • ' i • .•.. ---._ 4-36 b i Er PI ', k ---....- -ti -•••••••... 3, ______. ..._ . ii--, .0.1. ,4•!, • V e•. \ . ' 14-7•-..„... , • . Jo . • ri V it ''' \ t ; 1 ._:..--••• m -,—..... g ir, 14 , . ,., . -. • K.a . • . . o r,.;,7, -Eiq?.-c. - .--'• 1 ' ' . • i• !. .. iii ,- -•--olu... . ,. 0. . , 1 .` Si-,r. :' 1 • ' F is t., ' • 'IF •.:'.• •., „ • pun i • \ ‘ , , . ' 0 I • O., • ' O. 7 z° • , 1 A I CI \ • r • , , I ; .. . imik 1 . . • ? ' va \ 1 , 0 ,,;.,, um , .. . ii .....i. 9, . •• . ' • .. • ,r,____,,!..,, .... , . 4i7.---• -. • - • • • \ • ' .. !•'" IT 1 ,. • _.„.. , ,c cy • .. ;-•••....4... . /....„, . • •• d• .., . ,k ' , 0 ri? NMI,/ 1 u -. ., 1 .1. r. • -, 0. . . 1 • . 9----.1,-- • I , es/WWI. , i idV6_ .49 0 • . 0 • 1 . / r't 11 1 Plidrrs;, .. • \ \ . 7: I Plq° g • i ;i i 1: .• " in 0 , w .., ‘S.. • S. tt I' • @ ::11, .: 0 • . ,./ \ i ? A .• 1\ t \ • ri, , i• I (Inn 0 :, i , 0 •-asobs%, . . . • ••9 . 0. : , c, . t 1 ...........\_...? •_____.0 ,\111. . • • 1 , -13•:.___, _.,,.__ 0__.° _LI.ii 1_ .11 I . t \ \ - - 12— 0,1% • 4 ; 1 C...i -a 1 1 :" ....:_r L .0 _ 1 0 1 410 .... \ , • _._ .0 . . , ....„..c. ,6.. ,. .-: .. _i , . ., , . \ .,,.4( 1.--1---r---zr------ t)0 ... . 0 I ' ' .4• / °I... (/)I \k 5 0 , ... .7411 fry 1: : i ..ts \ , 1. iia 4 P C 0 1 1 • • ip ,sa 6.. 0, rk '.'-' - ea., ! : • • . CO •••I .. .. • • 0 , • .4„, • i ' ' ..k„.• . ° . I • T, i • • I •. I 1 • o. 1- 1 r- • , \ -W. i . i I\ • il '1'°' 0.1 . . mil cLi - . z . . . .., ,„ ,... ,-- LI , BMA „ . . 0 il \ , i ill I%-t t• .7:_.‘s . . • .h \ • , W ' • 1 •,ii . .. ° , • • • . . I . ik e • ,•••- UP-‘ Oa' ,' ' V,,-, \.,, .'., 11,1• . : - • 0 • 1 A ' ° • II, I.• gi .10 ( .. . CD' . . Cl) • , -, 02 , . 1 -- . ii • 1 Ti. . 1,, i• k.. 11 I o ; !''• ' 1 1 ... . .. .— . , - Tr-- r3 a ir:1',. —I or 03 IF . 0 ' ' ' di""1.6..• b:. ..) 1 i I . r I .1 • 0 , II Ct-. I- • I • • \ 11 '• I ---4 I Ill III \l ' • 0 . • . II. I 6. 3 I , ! ! I • • 1 . 1 C l• • - • iqZ I R I "clin r ;: . a e I 1 ••, - 1. . , ' i , ' • ' 1i 13? . i. , I: ' . I .; .o• 24.-o, • d-o• 1 • . \ I- , S. I ; ' f • 0\ ;3-a • .... , 0• • x 0 ...401. . , re Elm plop • a i. • I ,*4 s• ' 1 I • AN 0. -7. ,.. i. ; . e : 1.: • pos-si 0 g: ii (Ili (....•:• : . . (• . \ '.i• .. ' : Ii. 4 -•• .1 1:: i . 9 \ I ) •'. •• .', >I)I •• ,., , st ° •., r ; ;, • 1 , , . . • . ° ii C ' ; •••• 4 0 . •\ . . ,. • i , It • Ja- 1.I • Ili rqui 0 \.. , , ...•0 I di? . . ; , . r 1 — . 2 ! 1 il, 11 111Y i 0 i ‘ i ,0 7 )0 • • i , . ' . c 1 l! ilk I • e.,•,,, , 1 pp_ .. ii • ( • , i . • , 1 1 0 1 . si 1 , 1, ii 1 , f ; ii.iy sTi - ri( • ,° I lk -- . , 4.• . -41J1 . • a • . / - 0,. . . , , II I • 0 ' `4.11"%rei~.•HIAV•e44......... a) . N ea IV 2t•li . .. eolis, 11 . , . . ; : ii . • .• •0 .' /7"--- . 0 17.14• • • 93 . • . . , . T I. ;I. i • ‘ • --•::. . • •-:° ' 2:: . •,..7.-fZ\ -0 • . . . ' ''. ID . „. • ... • • -• • . . . . ' •-, , •. ' . 1, •:•:.--...4.....--77A1 _. = ,. . I Ysi•::i•-•*,1".‘,.•:ii.; Greg.L.AllwIne, AIA POI„ to, Prp igc 1;fligi'agi••1 ':. • - • - - --- • - ., .. o CITY LIGHTS APARTMENTS FERON, WA. '' • LI:•or o r-d3 ''fl '1•6".`,,-.";.:.. ,:.-.-e•-•1 ; 3 ,,..,,(P.rti,Ito- .;l'' EOM NOM WAY DEVELOPMENT COTrOPATIOM I , . . • W.I.....,:,...I.1.01,„ F-.w ,--R, -16.i..dale..Ge 50.aj 533 M.MILDRED,WM'Ill• ' -MOO, WA gene 12051 58:3-9100 . . -1•1:-. p) Latest • rev L• ••: ' b • . Fri 304 main ave.so.,suite 200 renton,wa.98055 (206)271-7200 623-5732 Mel Easter, ASLA . • . . ••••.•••• ' V.' ' -. :. :i•'• ' . • . . . . •. OF j A /1/ A. "\ c.3. a oz POLICY DEVELOPMENT NIL amoR 0,,.1--E•0 I.V:3(-°I VOA 'i‘‘',CI' .._.,A•'O. .-M:•10•0.1-•,,.-‘4:'.,v•1-'1.‘-..s.:.l).•)V s..Wi....l'...It14...."6KP r.-.l...s n--k-••v.•.•0-'• • *:.A,,.,,.......r '' 1."Z.-.,,200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 4. 1 n SEP1 1 • 1 ' • • • -WA- A'''' I''\11.-..........\-1 ... --C ,...JVAsy;. `-7_,,:_! ‘ Nil,,E,:f E Et • * * ROUTC 4 . Attn: Prop Dispos Brnch Hud 561 1321 2nd Ave #4 Renton WA 98055 i,,,-, -.)..,,•,--. 0 SUC;-i • `• oncr;. OE ,..)-) i,; d ;.• / F i , '1 s''' / 11Will!hiLvddtildi!dhl 1 NOTICE OF PENDING SUE PLAN APPROVAL REN"I'ON, WASHINGTON A Site flan Application has been filed and accepted with the Planning Division of the • Community Development Department. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. DESCRIPTION: CITY LIGHTS APARTMENTS ECF; SA-087-49 ... Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 70 unit apartment complex to be located on a vacant 3.3 acre R-3, Residential Multi-Family, zoned parcel. (Note: Density level has • been adjusted for greenbelt on-site.) • GENERAL LOCATION: . • East side of Benson Road between Puget Drive and South 26th Street. PUBLIC APPROVALS; o Environmental Review . o Site Plan Approval o Building Permit Approval The application can be reviewed at the Planning Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval. For further information on the application or dates of final action by the City, please contact the Planning Division at 235-2550. •, / r',I tCMJIINI------- -------/---• :I\ _______. ____ . . . �. N 1 nos se'to _ WINS OLIN . .`.�• LI NLL�CMOO� 1 l�.J �- 1•• f-;------ - --/-----g4) . ._. . . s /- , i .0 \ . --x„..,:,,,i „..f, ,0 , • • . . , . /1":.----1:7-Ili r-- W . .----7-77--t__._,_.._. _____. _, 1 11 r • 1/1 r..- C 1`F I °�S �,/ PROJECT SITE I ti O � 1'i ,1 / 1 i ,,M MAN CNUIICN _ ■ 777 LI IP/ i ' a. I v; 1� r ,� i _ I 1I .-. 1 P----__. --1,t, .4J--.::------- ' vicariumnirre . • -- • oNo is I J,.�L .r. (""j''�j�` . "la. --)i oos 1 4 --\ •, tie . • . • . ' •- • • • ' ' , •' • . . • • .. . . , J . . . . . . , .... • —. • -A • 4 • o 1 . , • 1 . A ••• • i I I I/ . .• ,- ., % I, • , ,. k.f-- ;.. i 1110 St.I "-.•SO.WoNT en Jror.04',1--i—i-a-Z. %. .1. 1.. l.... ''. .I I \ e_V i\I IT • 1 1 1::_ ' 11 „. . .....----..--,_ . • • 1..."'''. e-t- I.- ----•:7--; .‘ •-• •• It/ A/ Ir:—! . i • ,...___As_ o, do •• sla i •...../11 0 1- ,. I) • , . • •. • .di • t . . Itil ‘ 611 ° , \ 1 li oo% 9;4_ 1 • / . • 14.:..,\ • ' ??> 1 ...113‘...\ .. \ 0 c, 1 .r---- 1.1 \VI , • d.d.,1.k \--%\ \P \ L-14:1 , i.. • ( . • \ . I •\•\ - . I: 1 • • 4\ 0 • u---‘ e_.....‘ iti) t Alc..V 0 0 0 1 1 ; °: ".-Z. • A ot. \ , . , •, _ ._.• ... .. ,:,J,•,t ••._ ,,, ,e 16.ii \ 0 ., :.......\--.--t 413.-_-, E0-- .L2. -•- -: .. .. \ A _ i ), - • . ... • . I :\:\il 1 :,_--r. \ , _, ___- . , q,, ,4., , .e , 1,,Ite __ , ° 40 t ) • . 1 1 . \ • \\ ',1-q. ti,l, • _---,.... I- - '' 0 to' s\' '.\ . .. ° ' I.• . . ',..• I, . . 0 • -----n- li 0 1 ,, 1 • >» Int t — z. ' . ., \ \ \ 4) t i.l.i. ,...,... 1 to , • 13 hx- •.:1 P f • i • 15 i S 1 . , t • . I V . li i I , . , • • , 5 c fil , • . , ..••.b . • ) ' It \ \t. :. --7•1--. - o o 1" . % foe lig do IC . I o Id 1 : • .._\.P 1-- ___ _:,------J--- - _ _ 15' • 0 I I • • I• • I I R.1,1 1 • ---. . " ---- -. i; 1 1 • ' 5 CIP \ . \c i ' •\ --- m „ IS g 2 ___ —... I. .... • .... , . ,e '• °- i , . i .. .., . g /$f \. v--- f, ., % " n l'I;I. 1 fr--- -1°. -I,'. • i' 1 - t-i • 1 vii, , %. 631g • ,, • 7 i . --,-.„ c,. i . . / ort I. g • „...... in ° 1-.1' 1'6-,----1, I ,y . • an • I if \ , '"•-..,ts.A• . j 't 1 1.---71 e ..........-- . I g r • . 1 0 TO.• Vilee'S*4.. .1. * . d 0. I i ---\ g) ! ; R i A • 1 _____I . ; ° . • 0 1 ". i • . •i I 0 . ,I. I. i I 1 , ? 1 0 01.. • VI . \ ,.. I 4'1411 ‘•••:J.. 0 • ,. o lip - a \ . 1 1 • • Ci ' 1 I . • , 0 00 ••••• 1 ' 0 : • 1 - 0 1 \ P. 1_.? /_. Ii • • •- • ;\ \ .• - ; .r.--. -,-.1 :::-- .-• •— -0o__. .......„. 0 1 1 la j li ...._ ,i!, - 7129" -.477 • -,----1-----II -----.-,..-- 7—:- - ; ..L. :16.- 713j, 1 • . ' ° IS • - •....714t•-•'' --.-- .---in,. :IT L—k . .• . 111110 . • . _____i . , . : t..i•:i, . .:.- • .11 \• .1 vi.d. i - --::".--••••:-::-------: I R 04 0 . . . 4 • I a. (I) ' . • : r\... \:11111-° . 1 . Q-' -fk 9- ° I- '1 ..'.- ..I , ,. • ' 1-. -1 0., .. ...; I . . . ( • • \. . li i , ni , I i ,•7 .. 1,.....1 . . • • 1 . ' I 1 \' ' _ILI% ." " ^ " , a • i , • • 1 ° • : . . E t ,( ) 1t. .- i • • 1. ' 1 • A •4> 1 • Z ..... ; 1 1 I \ b • • t' . .,.... • Ai ... ... , vi , 1 tooi i 1 r- 1 o; .. • 6 " 1 • gi 1 tri: I ... :i.1 \ \ , , . ,. . . „ • • . , • 0 t . • S 11111 I ..... 6 • 0•1 '• • • i ; . . • 11,'.1. • " , 1,SIa:..2r.,..i.....• ......4..._....1, I,.l—iqIt. •...1...... ...111I..1.-I...-..,• 1Ii..l.l.,i li1i.1i.1li. Ii_,,'•---1 I1 c,, \1•' ,1k.tf.(1) •(•_0_- ;1 !,n *t . • u—I.,. o60--'E 0:".•; ENl---1--,ilI 1•i.:•:• . ,' .• I,1'.11,,.0I,1) 1l i.:I.i1)i 1\i.'1"..:.'I fI;.1I1,0:,(I'1II11•.'iI,1,'1,.; 1 . : . 1 . _ -71 I•I 'I' d lIi • ° ; .' ° \; 1 .-.1._,1•i.1I.1!•11 k .11.• • )41•. P%- . . .., • • • ,.! + 1• I , i . i'; I - — /.---7----. , . ...Liu •• 430:.1 • . : !1 I . . - 1.1.1111 ...,......... • .. . ; OS I f•i i•r ....______T_____.. -41, rill: - '-- •••••-.5.. . I . . 0 .. . 0 012,./4. .. '• r . ... .• • ' , . •1 I . ......•:,. . • . . • . •I...•V..,-.7-3.) .... - .. . . - . I-Greg L.AllwIne, AIA I , lel,/ rd to. t r,41135,-.1.0d1i.44..,`,:!');.. . CIlY LIUHIS APAIIIMENTS . robot 11A. -..i:•m • k.)1 ,t1/3.1,P..kIA't%\'W X.1'...1 IOW mon IN PIT OCMTV“COMITAIICSI . .1.1.1tC11 • t: S ‘16stlettale:v,30.01 . Lnlesi ley• r. Alb III N.MIMS WM'I' 111COs; LI IMMO troll 464-1.e• . :%:',.....::;. t•,.. ril •... g - 304 main ave.so,suite 200'allot''Vv, a 96055 12061271-1200 623-5432 I Mel Easier ASIA]! ------------ , . ' yr K. To POLICY DEVELOPMENT200 Mill Avenue South / `.; L`_i; y _ ,usr ra, ;�QoPam. Renton, Washington 98055 i �`1 ZG c.E z< <; !t,V�k 9'1 0 -Co°� C.FI�� .c�./ .c•7lf s�. .�?'�:L:L )•� ����q a ~v�.. V ��,.1 • sea 0�/22/ 39 ;! : r f --__,; f rME T ER- s * e CROC:F(E:Ii t e , ;0 RETURN TURN TO SENDER MOVED L_IE:FT NO ADDRESS Robb Crocker 1425 S Puget Dr #F1 Renton WA 98055 ii,i,!l,,i,ii,,,,i,1„i,i„i„i„iLii„I:,i„tl,ll i NOTICE OF PENDING SITE PLAN APPROVAL I RENTON, WASHINGTON i A Site Plan Application has been filed and accepted with the Planning Division of the Community Development Department. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. DESCRIPTION: CITY LIGHTS APARTMENTS 1 ECF; SA-087-89 Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 70 unit apartment complex to be located on a vacant 3.3 acre R-3, Residential Multi-Family, zoned parcel. (Note: Density level has been adjusted for greenbelt on-site.) GENERAL LOCATION: i 1 East side of Benson Road between Puget Drive and South 26th Street. PUBLIC APPROVALS: 1 o Environmental Review o Site Plan Approval o Building Permit Approval The application can be reviewed at the Planning Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval. For further information on the application or dates of final action by the City, please contact the Planning Division at 235-2550. ----=--- ----- _ _, I! - I I 1 1WJIN1O OLIN ti�� NfLIONJLJ110N j 1 SLIM OCNOQL _ /1 .:=.11.! ` \\` SCHOOL 11 {� 11 1 1 1� 1I 1 =-V”76::::111 r--- . . 7 i Q---4 -I - -- I r1JWVL.IG i '�^L - 1 1 J 11; I ‘.. '-'--'-"•, ..11 —171-- .. ,ft. 1.,,.:1 . ._i ., .--2777/// • .--.77"--z—. — ig li i i �3 k ' s / PROJECT SITEI ;i —' ?tc::::j ::: i i = �I L / 1•l11 ;:: r I IJ1f71 �i o 1 ryiv� �..Ir' � ...... r Y O11 " 1►ARIYORTO 1 .,t C .......tilk..........- Oell JQ-14C?°': \ - --.7i .� �a�gP • - I MJ ..-t .r'"i�-p'' •'CO 14 ��. ;�' ate1 L• . �' �\� / N...O11111011FIRSISLY 11[OOa1T1�L 1 . I . ' . . ' . . •1 • _ , .. .... ..... i. r . -90' wp:rert, puedirceoNitf------7- •`. t' ''.• 1\ A. '.\ \ \ .1 .11...1.. c: !. '.! • '•8 Or Sr I / .•13.0r ! •- • , '160% \ \.i 1 II .: ( p I • ;; 7--X---- ; . . -------" -e+ 1 - • -.- .. . \ , -.• A . : 1' , --H-I -ii-- ' s • 41 . .....\/". .,....\.,..: \.\....,, ,:pi> zit :. ° Z) c. :iitt It;rz0 oo, cbo e,... \......4... ••//' . °-,...,/..... 0. .0 . \ I,'11:\1!#1 !lc,..1„..11132.1 . ViliC lilt 2 tal)htl 01 0 1, 0 ) 1H ! ',°: 1 • • , .1 t •,,, dio mo t% bi, 10.!: „ 0 t %,;,,P,® . I •. • \ 'is iot4 S' ,.-,1,,,i 0 . ..e t lk • , c:, • • R_ ' \ • g-I 0 0 8.:,! !I it P c, • . % . w • A.. • -. O. ' ft" I. 1 . • I,' ' !..k • . . \ • .,• \ Iti. . i 1 nor, ora A 2 . . . . i . \ '' . .. ® ii 1- 'IT t - 0 1 0 .0° •!, 0", • ?R? ,-- (5, , • . 6 1 . ..-..t, . I \ • ‘ \ , violo d, : , co; , I, w • '• ' '. • \ • 1 1111 (6) Ile ° . 7 ' 1 1 '4 • . \ \ 1: . . , . 6, .• '. ii V ' 111 1.1 ------1 018 0t,„ 3 ' , II , • I rt '• ,••• rejl• . . s0w • . . • . m . .' . • Lo .. . •• \I_ ..!,- . .. . . q 6 IPA - I \ ,.V.,1 ./. ---- ....1 .0 , • -• --__ -. cp uo 0 $ I 1 i'.4 !.-- -j:" --- •-.__ - % MP. : ! I '\' i I . • V 17) c, \' 1. , 0 • \ .. t a '1 -----• .•- ''------''- -41A b 4•: ! I I. I ; li-, ._..1- • t , • . • ,C1 . 1 q ? gvr \ \\( ,'.: • .\ \ v-- „ 0 . • v.', v, t31-g . '' I , ,, • 7 ' • 0.1 ---„, 0. . , Ag • \ 0A \ • \ • , . p )• DO . @ • 1, • III • .114 • ...... i 4 • r Vil \c2 \ \l• • ., sr' • ....i. 0 . , • . II 1 ' ' • .• ittlti • " tic.11111Vrt.,.......0-. '-i: . • ---ii- % 4%. 0 • • I \‘ ‘: II ..,r,,I,'., i .16 e to ,, 0 L ! , l(r, '''•, . 1 • \ '' ,•T•:-.:01-. ,. ors •11111K tre...•0` wou. , .• 0 I \I \ : It 16,11 'al • • / : 2 , 7' • \. rr:10i0 ... .t. t.ii i 0 • • . 0 . i i \ * •■ ‘.1 11 • i i I / P i 0 . ,_ . ' -, : g m 1•• d, o • . `/ • c . \ , g s g z -k - • ; • • e 0 • \ tP • VI , I 1 0 \ II "PP o i % illfilk % • o I • ..9 x • . . 2 \ \ ,, ., • ••• a • 1 1 4± • P tv, 1 \ • • ::•••••\--' r) 00 • • ait., ' . o _ 1, ___ _ Ma _ • auk, ....\ -- .0 - • ; 1 e ' ...m. 0 ______ _a_.,... 11 • 110 . T. \ , . is, . • ..„.1_,,o-. . . ,. 1 = \. -- • -, -__-_. ( 4.ii I • / . ,•. • = To ‘ • \ 9:4' irl -r --! .:5al ------•••• • .. , 0 , • 41' • I 0., '°0 I e. 1 , • W 1 , 1 iti • 0 b 6, ckp e . ' I • 0 \ 1 opo• .". -•\ ' • P l'5';'• (3 °- aww. il' 0 -}1 ,, 1 • 3' „! • . , . --: d . ii 1 CO -1 • •- \ \ s, C, ••,• ' • id- 4/0 . .•., • •• • , ' • • t.• cp1 il, li • D) -.. .. . . .. \ 1 . • i I I b., 1,--1 . • ill__- -- ffi , . i • 1 • , • . i ( ' ?kt i ;" (Ir)>" • ; .i \ , .1 ! ,. . ,.. ( J , i, , . , a 1 II i . • • 1 ' 1 1 Z • co - • 0 1 • t, T ,c\D 0.i • ...11, ; . , • , \ z , .:\ ,, & , - a. • S.4 It 0 1 II gi . , 0.1( .• I.: e . . • . r 1----li 1 •: 1 i!'• . . 1 : '. k • .., ,!. 1 0) : 0 1 . . , s,. ....:._MM. •.. 1 1 I IT I• Ns >pi> --1 - 01 • 41"14 .16 . • 1 1 ., • I 1.• 1. i.,1,4,'„, ct MI ' • 1 .1 . (4 i)0 . • = , • CO 90' t • _.-- 11111 1 11. i: 1 1 1 I: ; I I\I ' ; '•; . . III \ j lo: •-f• 0: • !• . ;. ' .: 146. p i Hi I Li , ' . • \ c 4 li, 1 win a : t 0 1 I .. , i ii.i. li ., I, . I • \ • i 1. • • 1 \ ' ' 1.... ' . ._ 1 ' , 10.d. 2.4t0' ' e:. • i', ;0.0 • ' 1 .....„,../' = '....* 2 ' 04 .1,:: . 1: I (-1°P i .: a -i. 21111 i . . II. • I, .; i: © E.- ,,,, , • i ,. . i.• RI - 1 I , r. • 1 (11. '' i,. ' ; I 1 i i.I f I, .1. . • r. . : . M E) is. . ., ..._ : , • 0 o .•::: .- . 1: . . . • v ! ' z 1 1\ - ) • -•:, V.I ' --J o 2 'I, .1 !\• a li • ,,. • 9 ' i I: • 'll Hlf- 11-111 i •11 7 9 8 . i .; i . = ji; * 1 1 .1 • .., i 11 tqui t 0. k k Ili , ,. ,. , -.0 c., (2) r ,..1 7; )0.), . ' ' ' 0,i•(9 i 1 if II If ill . 0. . \i, 1 , i 1 iiim 0. 7 1• . E , 1 ri II i . -0 - 17 , e-,..„ i , . 3 ti:,0 (00, ,... , . \ 1 .; • Plir-- 19 : .1°°•• t&icc•-, I• r I ia i li•••, , • , ! • 7 . . 1.,.•. 1. 7, h._ ,Io al / °0 : e . • ( : \ 1 .114. ) CL o • ti) 0 ts V , 0 .0,177.-....,reolia .....• • VO Nil troy - •••- ava Ise - •-------'- „ 1 'a : l R., . . / 0237.1r ; • 0 ! ., 90 ' • -0 . 172 11::.f.:••••41,... ) 7 • 7 • • 1.•••:?:,:••••111.,";:i . - . --- Ill ---.Greg L,Allwine, AIA UZI . ,.,c•% i . . FkRiAct t;14:14e41.2%1 • CITY LIGHTS APARTMENTS Immo+. WA. o° • I-d if. 4A,•.,,t••• ...,.•v.-) , Tr.‘,71111R-\''• ,I'' FOR NCIITH BAT 05111.0PMENT COPPORATIOM i 07 C...t.'ATI..a.mmtCI Issue date,0.50.61 637 N.mono. MITE•O' ' 5.7 • w IN Latest rev.I. f:(lb TACOMA. MA 96105 12061 566-1.00 , • , ..01,:;....:•17,..tin 7 ...1.',...2.::::. '..-. V' ..••• . Er) . - • 304 main ave.so.,suite 200 renlon,wa.98055 (206)271-7200 623-5732 i Met Easter, ASLA • -•• • ..,•.. ••'..1"•?..•, . . • •••• •'.. .' '...' t. ' • . .. :1•', • .• ' •i: .,,,,,•:,.• . • . ilimmommenow -_,Aimmwm � O a 'a ' • CIT'rf•- -.1!--.RENT.ON C'\�1!_ .U.o.PDSTial,Ely Y C� ',OMMYTNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT i w ET •R -ti i 'T ` } ' 'f a u �u�zc 'es . 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 Tp4Fp ,„ `12 '� 1\ • • oeeQ. l.Ava 1i 900166:J "' * * = c - A Wasl ington Cr' poration Seahurs' .`6.• C 2050 l '.2 th _ ve NE ; ,... 'co9 471,1 1 of 404 ,,j Renton WTi 98055 . Au afie i NOTICE OF PENDING SITE PLAN APPROVAL RENTON, WASHINGTON • A Site Plan Application has been filed and accepted with the Planning Division of the Community Development Department. The following briefly describes the application • and the necessary Public Approvals. ' DESCRIPTION: CITY LIGHTS APARTMENTS • ECF; SA-087-89 Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 70 unit apartment complex to be located on.a vacant 3.3 acre R-3, Residential Multi-Family, zoned parcel. (Note: Density level has been adjusted for greenbelt on-site.). GENERAL LOCATION: East side of Benson Road between Puget Drive and South 26th Street. PUBLIC APPROVALS: o Environmental Review ' o Site Plan Approval • o Building Permit Approval The application can be reviewed at the Planning Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to Public Hearings, during ! Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval. For further information on the application or dates of final action by the City, please contact the Planning Division at 235-2550. I ' I !WNNO OLIN li 1 1 1/ �`` 11lLLI i lLIY!C QL _11 _.� 1J ill I �L�11•I I l` .�-----.-^•.•••1 r-•... , ,, (I_ IN • 11 ; / 4Ji \Lu \\ ocrucemc • ... .AMRILIG I rItIJ� 1 ft- r---4 - - -- -- .777/7-7-// .71--. ig c i _ r'r! i! sII / PROJECT SITE ;r--1- / .r : } 3 �1`I ; / ;M!!t►TIIIMN CNINICN ;`; `� YIC7 .YANTYlNT! �\ \ lAIILT M.0lNTI:L . . . . . . . . • 1 . . -I - • ........ . -----—- . A • I . . • 1 ,t 0.•."-6•S..:it \ N• 1 I, ,• • ..•. i 0 WATER,.RalE4, Ir. w $1-3 .03 1'--4 •.I .1 ) .. -.. )- . ,A1 1 . . ' ' lN 01III i i \ f . / )V II1 ,' . • 1 . ,.., I , ,A,,.. • ...,1;14 31.11 !, o cips.. loot;te0 00,(60 6 1 . liftel ..,.e.,/ r 7. i /...... I-1 ...0 t 1\\* ; 1 • *on / . i 1 . 9.I It010:6441 11111111!)' ' A t • I ' PIO V 01 o tii,' i' . • • ', i 1 . 1 • i li, tD C •• 0 •e t % i\ete t 0 . \ • . R.. \ • 4;* 111 • 8•' 6 l• ' . . . • .,,... ‘ 0_ . ib • 0 • : • ---: •. .1..1di_g1,Lr>1I1".rTCA•i-' \\v , \‘.....\•\P\tt..,2z s\‘z.•107a.';':.•..\_/...l_.-,_-.a-;_vn:'7_c,_,_•\1.•\--•-D 1L-- --i'11'1 cC.) rrZ•.-,^4 ,.__n7•_4:i4,0 \ v _• 0 ,..,...1.••1..f)1 i. .i. f c,_°I8 rt di•\ -@....a 11\ g----1--•s‘I..o'''°'i'0'o:o 1 \‘1 - 1 • • P? oo " c ur) 4Aopb ••..if)I I.A..'0.%1 0".0.=I.iI-.\;.,.I.k'.r:f"4.31r1 1A':•, •. —.2:a1•1.; i;.,2•l,.•.., I . 1 — . — \ ( \ l I \\ " o6 0L 0 0 •\ \ ' \ _ i 1 0 „.I'!,•,• 'J,•1•,O.:..;-1• • -... Ag ele.14. 1 rpa 1 • . 1 •• • I. 1 k • • 0 . • . o I i'l rid961- 1,/ L i I 01 ' \ \ \. lb la 01(1° R. .I: •i\ I o , i 1 i r• 0 , — I 111 P' Olt 1,i 0 \ 0 Ilk S t I 1 ® 4, • \ - • • 4 e, o • \ - ; •. . \• ui \ . .:;t1 \ I "n" ,D I i . • , . , 0 • " '''•'9 I. 0 • .., ,is . g 0 00 ' . , • 0 0 I. \ —1:-\—) --. ---(11111---11•!1•71111• \\ ••••• . 0 • • 11 1 . I. 0 • I 'i 4 - O—_...._ _ _. ...0, •ta...it _................> , . 0 - • - '2"- - 4TL-- 111' \lig •--A 1 i 0.1.4 -'----A - C.. ..— tra1.— Ou, \ o •— _2.;. _ • ----- -MO— . —_et. jr1-1-1- =, 4110 M! en ; \'' \ 4. ij =------------ ib 0 .. . 0 • ; vi . i 6. I •• ! ,' .,...::**...\..,,, CD \ , • yr-----"r 8, I s 0 jai, e . ° ,' ' 1. s . , • • 1.. -1 0. cn • . 1 . = . iCl' ... 9 2— — — C 1 0 0 .15- 0 II I ... , , . 1 . sir:: , ,f \, 70. 16- 01:1 1 0. .... \ -c• . 1 1 p_),t.. . • • . i i ' I • 6 ieqt I-- - oiu" 1 ' I • 1; C' r-71 ; . . e\ . - 1 i ®'• 1,. 1 i 1 !( . ?ku.. 4g = 4-1,- . • 1 - le' i 4 Z - \ 31•• 1 1 . -LA , . ai • , .• 1 0 i t i O. . . . . , i g ii, 1. \ ' \ 1 ; !I e 0' ,------ 1. ; 1-0;• ..• • . . • CD; • • • lk . I 1 0 . 2 11 1---- II • . 1 • , e, ... 1i) III I .1 v,i, 1111... 01 . o ........._,,•_ ,; . • 0. : 'II. • .,1i1) • 1 4 3 • . \ 5d1. NE i1)1•14,1, . , I Ct ME I * I 1 1*I il r'; • . . (10 I \ A - PS, • I; j f: '.., --. gill I . I \ I . I. (3 1 . I • • C - • I; 111 riplo g : I . o I ; , 0.00 \ Is ' 1 1:1. • • a . 0i10. 10 is ., .P. ; . E 6 t .1 115'"CP Mt°. ' Y- • *. • • i i •• .m.. ,...,„,____ 0 I frp • '4 -.. !NOM . ; 0; .. 1 !II . • 111 . 4 a -.fir • . 1; • I, o 1 ' -1n . I 1%, 1. supgaii • 1 1 0 . •. 1 1 , 1 ( f:. • .. . . • 1 I . 11 .,,, : , . • , i •=0.,• , • • - z • — 1 I • - 9 \ I ) ---I 0 i-3 . I i i. Ei. ici 11 • .• , 1\ , • n P 1 - g . i 1,1 iii 17"11 • : \ •) " ° e 11 1st 11 •;0.1 ; ? I 1. 1(A ' i 11 i 111111 1 0 ' ' • lo Ai , . / ,, .,.. , . • . . • , , .. ,... E" • 1 il ii . 11111 , '•:. I ) ; eA-,e,,, i 1 1 pr . i {-itm •0 /01 1. I 1 ( 1 • , I • ''ccte"1/4-,cc• 0 -0 • , • is , ' , • •:. (i , • i °0 ° i \ i t, • ; ) z • . , ( 7 1 . li 1 0. _______ • • . rn . / o i. • i I '...ii. • i,• I •• .41I•haTor::•••1111/•••41, „ .• _ " , 0) . N IA I?'2I•IV - ""IIIPAIIIIC •------"" . 13 k • I ,' - -_..--1/ c0 • . .' / , 01.137.14. 77---7-7—z-i-a_ 93 V . : I i,•••••:.......:::,...•.!:.\ 0) . • 3 ' . 3. • I.k...: -'i--'iirI--1,1• 5 . ___________________20,•. ._...-_-________________ Greg L Allwine, AIA ro o Prgig.Ck t'Aiti'litiffi.i:•.:!1'" • CITY LIGHTS APARTMENTS • RENTON, WA. 0 . E-V_JJ te: .'il(.4ii",itre•-\:w..v..i.) 1 n --,'-'r,.: ••:,,. •- " . FOE WITH SAY DEVELOPIEHT COPORATION C 'issu'e date•C..Sob) •33 N.MIMED. SUITE'11* • 7-7 r‘ITACOMA. AA gem, ME 563-9400 ID , Latest rev.,. f ., ,....„' cn ::,'"•-'•-"' •.--• i- --s 304 main ave.SO,suite 200 renton,wa.98055 12061271-7200 623-5732 e Mel Easter, ASLA ' l • .• . .-•..... : l''' i ' :.'.'•'. . • . . • ..• • - . • • i . • • . . . - ---- Y OF Re - 4. ilr ,y O POLICY DEVELOPMENT U " Z. wawa i .� '! z.� 5= 200 Mill AvenueSouth RETub ' e ,xw,,;; :Us PDSrn,Ffj -- z rIL S -a 4.. — — i it e Renton, Washington 98055 : Cr" �° JUL , �n^- , '., P� :ore se, 0 9 �1��L ZG f e GC`Y 1 U i 3 I\t\1 9 9l'eo SErCe`' �2Ctai Rdil5oiv Ck£ `i '� ?, ` `�11 I!8 ins;•-jee Rk Re sef° RASt4• _ 1 M•E r E R" * ° e Na 4 n v no fli d � 1 9091660 9 o seen •s re et sn �e not re"oauC n 1n sta mb er this envai -- • p, y1P, Corporation Seahurst Inves' 2050 112th Ave NE Rento. n WA 98055 l • .' lifl <i!!I!1iw i1li'!i!ii!IIJ'!J- .. NOTICE OF PENDING SITE PLAN APPROVAL RENTON, WASHINGTON A Site Plan Application has been filed and accepted with the Planning Division of the Community Development Department. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. DESCRIPTION: CITY LIGHTS APARTMENTS ECF; SA-087-89 "• Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 70 unit apartment complex to be located on a vacant 3.3 acre R-3, Residential Multi-Family, zoned parcel. (Note: Density level has ' been adjusted for greenbelt,on-site.) GENERAL LOCATION: • East side of Benson Road between Puget Drive and South 26th Street. - • . • PUBLIC APPROVALS: • o Environmental Review o Site Plan Approval o Building Permit Approval The application can be reviewed at the Planning Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval. For further information on the application or dates of final action by the City, please contact the Planning Division at 235-2550. ........,r______,_________ :I.\ % .• 1 `' •" Yfl\OLJL.JIIQN I 1 I SUM SCI oQ: _ i /_ ,,i I BCNoo� �1.+ .. -..-_-..J '1 ��1 1 '''''' '-'7...;::..1 r .\ . __ , `--- -i' — _ le r ' PROJECT SITE I (r ic::::J ..4) ,••• .., . , ___ • , i S n,i --7771/777-71--..._...._. ..____ ___O posnrunws a eN I /1 -mil ' - .�'- rICT 11ARlYlIfTQ -trl - • . - tie �. , 1 .<. \X . 1 ,.. .\/3 . • . ...4. ,. • it ` . • • I 1 1 1 ' /: (. ! E•L100e a. S r" 1 -�o wnTe� yore{� l •1• I.. . \- \ 41 \ ir •A: 1 : 1!\ Ir •t �_ / \ . Ilc(A \ alik: wi> , i , . ( : , . \ [� i� �1 cc !! p �� I� o. fir. ,r '�, i ^„ of, ,\ ` ° p \:� 1 . i v 1 � r pn �i 1� o= ® �' k 1. : / r.` b ['VAN AN \ I 1 I , riolo .-----r--) 1 i, ° 6: I • • I la . 1 44 • ' i t VC 1\ \ \ 114-k .,:: )i • \ \ \ \ : o % '" , °is o I ` 1 t cp • q.F 1 — -y — _ �, mop •:� I i n t.A li ill 1,„. e.i• .. ; , . if in 0.1 --.,,, 0.fit lh fq \ V ,4 , ' n ,, 6 2 m2 r e% • '\F \ \ • I 0 N i I \ • •• . no, 60,.c. \ 46•44". i / . 00.. i � R 1 •• t 1 : ° , • p\ —4 :) r p ii ` 11 �ylyl, ��1 1 r• : o • '- l .• ill v yF� i1 " 1• ' r! • t ® : of ° \ rl y al 1 • �Irin i p • 1 , I irk p \ 1 1 °.. ° I ) I ( v I • l 1 • _O 0039 ••• \ \ I4 N I —1�;ri -' Trr -- --- --- --- 0 t I \ o .___ ...6 J-.;. _ . v______.•a Z.---••••.- -—vie__ . .• _____,t,_ • 0\ . . ....... • \ . --...—\--------- tq ` n o 410 • 1 • ... .— I ___J t% •i. ' r I. . m I I r O 1 �•' • • \ *1•1 10. .� o g�, I I r1 � • I - . 1 11-- • I I s i .. I f � I � y 3 D 11'. 4I Iil ��. 'I� ' , ' I I Z I t n Q �1. 0 O e �' ,����e i I�d 1 i , . . r� I i l e p $ O o ■� , o•P. ' • , il\ \ . 1111 ---- " 1 . % ; ..:!. . & \ ,... . 1 \ . ! . \ --- ni{ I I I l III I • gib. 1 , II . 1 1 • t I l I! I , (10 e. . I I • S n !all O I • I f I ; I ` .� _ 0 • r I 1 b_ D d {Q� o� I ;o'I.a��.III I • �{ i1 'I" . ' I ^K'P ; ' I 1 r I \ice u. • ° 1 . ill --I— . \r 1 { ) Ii I? lir I--Jo 0 ! I 1I ,• i 11 {{ 1 0•. \ �iI • t .• oai I II 1 13 Sit 11 jI 1I 0, F ri O 3 i: t ' 'I1F 1111 , r • 0 toi I ' I I. i e • . .1 • � I I r , r L0 rp :I I i 'o •f e ouI ' . '' i I : I I. • oia � I ~I`i (....:... • j :,;';�'1 ck�;��d6,Ry•; .. • I Greg L.AliwIne. AIA I Ii�tl ,1 4 f� :j CIlY LIGHTS AF>AFIIHENIS nemoK wC. .t 1.1;t•'r("•aJ tart Ior1IN an t( (VT[0.41III01 ''ISSue dale:4.Oo• !' �'I III N.FILMED. •III[7' V•.1.''.:a tales!1(Y �� 4*CI & ■. *MS WA vt•t.oe •GY _i Cs:i:Ii 304 main ave.so..suite 200 renlon,wa.moss 1206)271.7200 623.5732 ( Mel Easte AMA J • moss • ':,1• �', ,.. 5 ' OF RFC .. o POLICY DEVELOPMENT 1` Cs z „ti-� e-: o = 200 Mill Avenue South `,' �< '± � �'0 Renton, Washington 98055WII_. w;4 "9 97N1 ��} ;^ ; z^! <<'d '. 04.P6 _ f/_.f�,L1'.i�''F j� 7;:: �'? '• "':Ja:.r-''+! ! '-- . i4TE0 SEPSES ,\ /�RETURN Tr- ..=� "'.� lr a i `►'w `_. _ NO F'ORWARDINC; []FS'L�F:Fi' CONI=' :i_E: 1 s���F,, . . . hEll� r��'y UNABLE' TO F'ClF7l4�:[} Thomas Lee Wilson PO Box 88534 Tukwila WA 98188 NOTICE OF PENDING SITE PLAN APPROVAL RENTON, WASHINGTON A Site Plan Application has been filed and accepted with the Planning Division of the ' Community Development Department. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. DESCRIPTION: CITY LIGHTS APARTMENTS ECF; SA-087-89 ''" Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 70 unit apartment complex to be located on a vacant 3.3 acre R-3, Residential Multi-Family, zoned parcel. (Note: Density level has ' • been adjusted for greenbelt on-site.) GENERAL LOCATION: • East side of Benson Road between Puget Drive and South 26th Street. . PUBLIC APPROVALS: o Environmental Review o Site Plan Approval o Building Permit Approval The application can be reviewed at the Planning Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval. For further information on the application or dates of final action by the City, please contact the . Planning Division at 235-2550. • ---- , II ---- ------------ :,!\ ' • 1 I • ' " . IILL.OlJ..JININ i .IIE.CNOQt _ • /� _--- .__ \ ram-7-71-- ......:________ ..._..._. _. ___. It_ %---*:1-A -1- --- ‘ '-777//// / �PROJECTi. I••• -1.. •••-•""••••- • i /7/ SITEa , I. ' 1. ::: , / CN . O . - - l .. ‘, ' •• • . 1, . . • . • . • i • . • . i . ... . , J • .....:. . ..... . . I ..-- . .. .- . . . — . -.....- .. . . . . • . . ( ..'• ' i I i '1/ • ' I. t. t-L-•-• -00. wfra PuNrir Ikort .soma. . „ .. •'• % / • • I " i•N ;Or lie I . • i .-—1- I ;C.. • ' . r. ., i • /. ....":••• • .„,...../N I ir , -, 1 .. I ‘ 1 t • k i 1 • 1. ' —I ' , 4 4—e • Ss : . ---L--,-7,- '' \ ,. .- ' A.,. : iji • „ A ,, • i, „ . . •• • • .. ,, P. .• \ , .,...._...„, . ,,),,, ,, - , t ‘V4e °°°, 0 . V. • • %../,\ • •• ,),,. . \ ...i...2....‘\ .. t....y.L , . • .. ,,,, . . . .; • ‘ \ ff.- ' • it 1 , . ( , \ „.. . /.,I I: . . 1,.il. -0-• ' a . ., -e•.. s. • ot. ‘1.. t • . il •\!k i c IQ t.'lir' _ t. si\ ‘ . , . t kl---' . A__Is• o • \ . i ) • P_ 14 I , , 0..... ,, 41 t 0 i t • \ 4 A IP 1? I II. :. 1 \ IA - 0::Cr)'‘ -..i. - F.-- iii. . ' ; $ - % • ! i • • . \ • jq, lik •qv ‘ % , e 6„ - ' !, ‘ 7. \ 1-i . 117 , , ......------ v 0 1 I.• ; b ----c., 8 . ' \ \ . 1 .- 1 0, i • : 1 • >,,,14:3) -IT t ®r zl' 0 00 , • , 1 1 6, . • . a . 4, t• I ,„.....,..- 1 ‘ • . 1 J, co 1, o. • % \i ' ta 1 11. E I • , 1 .4 • . \ .1 elk-- ..:: 7 ' • 1 101 , f \ •, -: 1 ' . 110 f___----, mg .01 3 1 . 1 : • 1 i; .... • .; \ \ ... , •... \.\., ..••-0 • • t. C6 • . • 1 • 0 4 . • , • • R qi 0 .,1 • ---;-,11— — 7-7-, 11.' 0° ' .._ ' . .:,•. - ..._\-r)\- - .. __..___ ,_c° I.. - % .• ...*s. . % % ... , 1 .... . •\.. - ---- --.... .., • il • i , I . ' i„N o 41 ; 1 1 • . "..------ 4411 I 1 1 I Pi - -- •-----... 117 . /..- t--.,, . i : . . .7o • . If \ / • ' . ., , ts A A ' n r•5; blg -t, • ,€) v. 1, 1 , . i i -st,„_'•', • 1 • i) „ . . .... --„,,,, 0. • 1. 1 1111 z , ,...... In o I • I bP% • , . \ ... 59 • i‘.. e . • Iltr- 04o •-; -.. '°-1•:d--'' - ' . • ----7-. 44 , I '`-..6 la•• ,. i/ X . \ ' - 4i.V.I 1 ,iii ,, .1/ , • if ., 1 , . : '•-• I. ‘ ,, . •1 a.. r.0•1_ . 1 ____-\ ••• •• • . • 0... , / id90. i . „Irl ___-\ •It...\C.. \ ____7------111111.170 ____41 413 i 11: 0 I. 1 ; 1 1 0 • • . 0 k :I . '1.1; "II i . " • g 1 • I I i I i i . 0 - 0 e • 0 i . \ . . , 3j 1 I . • m z r, \ (yin , /* ..0 1 • 01 lir p U • NI A \ • \ 1 1 • • • ' 1 ‘ • ! ,•\. , .,CA, 7 11111111111111111 III ''. 0 ' 1 . ; 4, • . 00 I i • . tr 1 I ' -..•••• - ____0__ _ ...._ -00---..___ _. I 1 I - - '.1 4.1_ 0 • : -1?- - Tg_ 1L. . on ;4 , .• • \ \=_•-•--1.-----1 ; .iti: . 411110 • : \ . . . c _ . •0 let : - 61- V . ... .__, , ........i ! ° :( ei ...•• 5..". \ r;•(.9 .___.. __-- .......- A 100 I y • . 4 t. I " 1 • •T• -4 . ti°li . .1"• 'wt.' '•I r 1 . u) .. . .. . . t vt. ..... _ ..,..,...„.. (1 li\;-7. _. a) o \ .i. 1 1 \ 0 • . . N t 1 r. . AN: , 0 „,,, ••, t. i 4, I , ! • i-11 .r— •••• . 1 1 . •citl4P 11 kv • ! 6, 1 , . u • 1 1 't I 4)=. . . • I \ 1 \ ; . .1 \ 1,1;_rii....:PI . .. - , /II , I { (. „ . ,•• i i • • z y.14 1 \ \ 11 1' • t% • • \\N'• .11, j arr. I °I • ' v.= fir 1 ! . • I i • ., k " gt i° r•:. I i 1-9. . 1 1 • . • , .., .' .5, ' 1 1 I ___.1 . , . 1 it • • • 1 . i 0i• . i • . • ,!• . ,. ........ . I .. ., .• il.\ \ If is. • liz !Mt 1 0 - z . . ...so .,\,. .. . i 12. . . • • • 1 . sEit.• ___ ' 1 ' ' ' . • • \ . . •. Li —1 : i t • I r . /11,, It ili mil e. i 1. 0 H ____ . 1 i , .1 1 , . .• rl 1 .1 :(7.--. , • lae-d • , • , 1;, S . 0• 1 . • 0 ' , 1 h . 1 nrP •' • I i s .111 ill - . 0 i .... ' 1 ,. is t'77'. i..'t . ' ... . . I 1 1 - 0 • t ' 1 I • U. • si. • I 11 ! ( /..) . • 6. . I I, - , • '. I . (. • • 0 . •,•.-r.2. — - z .I i_._j 0.Q I% ,1 ii • ' 1II ! i . D .• , 1 P_ • 1 --1 . - 1 g• i 9 31; 1 I.1 11; 111111 i , i ,• 1 ! .! ri— ci . 1 . i , vAll t;, 0 1 .1 • I II' 1 1 I ti , It . _ / ___e„ illi 1 . ...1:,,0, .),....r_____ ,.._ q ,I imp,oe / ie/e .i' . I • . 1, , • 1 .il i.0 ' •loi 1.. i I! 1 i I:1 . . . „ct,e4..,, . . , , . . . , .. ( • ' c, . ii. t.• ,:il / ?0 ° °.\i , „ . , 1, . . . 0 o • ( : I ., 1 I 1 1 • • 1 . , i . . 1 . qo •-...o______ a •••••1011•40111111001( • a r 1 1 . . . . IN Oa Ira" - ...... ter - :7-1-'77- ' ' o ; o an 44- • ----4-7-77-7—, 1 - • . ' , ' • I I , --:-•z. . ' .•,\::,...--,11*.tzzz.,.; . . . --• - - -----.--- - -.• - - ••••••••• • ' .• — Greg L.AllwIne, AIA I IIII,/!.' t-t Hi ,.. ir,IITVIV1041ti.11;.. • ' Kfj ' :,Ilift,i0,4'- '5...i:.) CITY LIGHTS APAIHMENTS FOR 141,11 NM IXVIIMINER?torin1/10.1 • 11E111171. NA. tr*.l...tri...omit! 'gill('(1ille I C.,9011 1113I N.MUM. runt'IV s t: S LetesI rev 1 .- 46116 MOO, rA SINS hog 11• 541-.00 • FMel Easter, 1 ___._.___.___ 111, 304 main ave so.suite 200 felon,wa 98055 1206)271-7200 623-5732 ASIA ' . • • :. . • • • -i: ., ,.:.: • . . • U. l 'CAA, C A, o POLICY DEVELOPMENTmil . Mill Avenue South '- K_ :_-, °� Renton, Washington 98055 Lrt2G ' �, '�, ;) „ 09gTFo SEPS�Me�P `y), ✓ • t T E 1 e • x E:sl-I 25 242:'_24Ni. U :2.2/89 Robert W Eshenour F;ET'URN TO SENDER 1425 S Puget Dr #109 NO FORWARD:I:NG ORDER ON FILE: Renton WA 98055 UNABLE TO FORWARD • ':ELIVERABLE e IWORESEEQ ms' J• 6861 N jF.,•+aLE TO FORWARD " WIN' m RE TuRN TO WRITER I 4 W c1 y I, , , I ) 1 • NOTICE OF PENDING SITE PLAN APPROVAL RENTON, WASHINGTON A Site Plan Application has been filed and accepted with the Planning Division of the . Community Development Department. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. DESCRIPTION: CITY LIGHTS APARTMENTS • ECF; SA-087-89 . Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 70 unit apartment complex to be located on a vacant 3.3 acre R-3, Residential Multi-Family, zoned parcel. (Note: Density level has • been adjusted for greenbelt on-site.) . . GENERAL LOCATION: • East side of Benson Road between Puget Drive and South 26th Street. PUBLIC APPROVALS: o Environmental Review o Site Plan Approval o Building Permit Approval The application can be reviewed at the Planning Division located on the third floor of Renton City 1-lall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval. For further . information on the application or dates of final action by the City, please contact the Planning Division at 235-2550. • --- - t 1 I — ---�i------- --`__• 1. i MEMO OLIN li 1 YILIOMJ*.111ON I i CLEN SC ... J. .. ; /C =1-1\:,:s:tils SCHOOL ��1 C 1 t•\ II .. 4f - +�� - • .__ _7 fi'kd \ ale , , MaLo, ' s 1 � I. ; V I PROJECT SITE I ; //// , ..., No ko 6- s•:---... Is-3,-;_e_,--,,L,,,..,41-4„,.t., , , 1 ,,,,,46.0„. cc-1 -(i, - ,,,-- ,, ,....„ .. ... ...-....,,,... , .....,, , , 04, .prive,' ir-axl.,, .;.. .--.Q,,,y14:,,,,,,t-14z,y49 i • . _,..,-''':1"::-. Cittr- .4(440 •_,,, ----1.. Ey" . . ( / L.I.LE.,I�f II�.OfM,tiL • ' i{ • • • • • • '. . 1 1 I /I • 1 I. !---------9o' wveR ' i I {fit o © • • i ,. . 1 .— A '.• 't , • v ° , , .40 .0% 0 . .. ...sc . ,..-. \ ot. . _ .s.,,\_-,‘ . . ,.. . 1 , ....d . \-----;\ \ \ . . 0 ,, 1 1. •. \ ..., ,A, , •7,. ,,,I,,,,.„,,, I. i • i e . tr,„0.‘•k___, ,, ‘‘. i i . • ( , t .4\t...?.® 0 1_11' : . . V \ i ) • . \ .5 A .1 I .."0 L ; \ 0_ ,, tr. `d��1iii cr�rc ����� g • I' ' • I \ , .,........' ' t 00 1 .\ 1 eAr ..,1 7 ip . E', • ' '" .1. 4,1.• '11 \ \ .. , .... \i...V.... .1..2 ... % • • 1 .1 . 1 ° I I 'po� F �' \ OR c., ...\ • ; i I. 1 / 11 •+ • ii ; . „ ntV - 1 1 7.1401 b �i I ( I I 1 R rr •LI ih \ )(--- ,f, , , ' ' . e , .e 1 . ep 1 ; r�=�--,, \. \t 1 r1I SIN !I]I ,, -© 1 II. \) 1 \ .1; \ ----r----- 6I 11.,1 --'---.1)1 • racy, s 1 S ° ° I : 1 i • I 1O fa ' WI' \ \ ‘ " 1' \..- -:1--- -----r 1 ; • % i 1 1 1 —:,:lj . S' . \ , 1 - ... .,4 , :, 1 ANof U ° • . tO\ . _.\ . \ . , . •lip 77 \ -r '- U J- _ _ IIR ••••• \ . ri.:.c_1_,... -r. -I:------- U 4' r • CO • o 1rlY i \ \ t II 'C.\ ' . 1 l I.. 1 1 4 I % • �5 I1 i�, r,4 x:. - ' 11. i • ' . i 1\ _Ili '1°1 O Sri aP 01 (;1(,..i;\II ! I". • .i ill 1 It . \ 1� !III I °.. ' i to • Faia%' I ( • �' I I --- It t -a ,p____I I. (I I •jli II I '.. . .111 . II ' Min a i © 1 i i ' ' f11 ' � ed s i ,1 — a II ` '' z I I 'li —' ° i '! •it. 1 1 • , • :. . , . I k!( , 1 • of p •' I i . li 9 I Nl�tt ;ISI� _ J° V !d 1 1 i I I I flip o' f ' O � , I' ' p,I . . ; ) , i' ' � I �I 1 • 1� El!. I 11t 1 o q pn )II i1I1' ' ,. ..... . , :° ° IiI I r1 Qt� cti• o 1. I • 1 ,i) . ; ( ... II' I,\I! 4) • , j ,,, • I i • t w ll•`r�N� .�.. , (ii..:4'.!14 . I �irlrcEr '/'d ,:•'�. - Greg L.Allwlne, AIA I •' -Iill� ii ' ;`II .1 �tyKi::� CITY LIGHTS AF>ARIIIENiS WAX% A. �;:•'•,,M •j ''I9..�• FOR MOW•lr R IRrrx,rr CQroutIU I.tt j, I-1 •issue date:6.90•171 011 M.NOMAD. ante•.• r' lnlesl rev : MOM,•• AIM MO t•t-9•00 ilib -.-......_. :a 304 main ave.so.,suite 200 renla\,wa.sooss Izoslz>1.7z00 e23•5732 ( Mel Easter' ASIA • .-- '. t '• . A. o POLICY DEVELOPMENT 200 Mill Avenue South �t 4 V`� Gtl /rgeR" 7. _s L.o pp$9T bE *Renton, Washington 98055 =� _` I�ii ; qo P6. JUL 20 *29 I �m" , ►! r ;; qq 9� , ./ w TFD SEPIEM ` Z. p�M E T E R' ' " * � R_'a i 9 1F,F.0 e rt DEW 25 242.224N j, O /2:`•2/8 9 RETURN TO SENDER NO FORWARDING I:NC. ORDER ON FILE UNABLE To FORWARD Bertram W Dewell 1425 S Puget Dr 0-1 Renton WA 98055 It 3 } 31 I I 1 1i l: 1 i, i NOTICE OF PENDING SITE PLAN APPROVAL RENTON, WASHINGTON A Site Plan Application has been filed and accepted with the Planning Division of the Community Development Department. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. DESCRIPTION: CITY LIGHTS APARTMENTS ECF; SA-087-89 Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 70 unit apartment complex to_be located on a vacant 3.3 acre R-3, Residential Multi-Family, zoned parcel. (Note: Density level has i been adjusted for greenbelt on-site.) GENERAL LOCATION: East side of Benson Road between Puget Drive and South 26th Street. PUBLIC APPROVALS: o Environmental Review o Site Plan Approval o Building Permit Approval The application can be reviewed at the Planning Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval. For further information on the application or dates of final action by the City, please contact the Planning Division at 235-2550. I / _, 1. �`�\ �IQN+ILJIION ui SCHO_s SCHOOL 1 -------:A r .„,, , • ., ,, ..., . Nri.it_rne. 1 i 7 - — I ! ni.PuctLic, 1 1 = --�. 'I., I ........... 7-r___,.. w ,FL__ f-----Al ,. . --f—t_,-- , ' //////// . 00 �)J C➢ ! 1 1 / PROJECT SITE , -` 0 1 • r•, , • I -------E_- I . = i • ,�rNISSRS11YN CHURCH ti '., oPP°I.- ..:::-::;-I* I- •^5: s t----;:t-j"--1k4C?:-/. \ ...-I-:/ i rk%Prretrtrdl 1 \•• .--.C7,Q, 4" )-t,fr' -•.49 t; ---1 - --,3•••-• 10-Aw••• d•-::::-:7:; cy.zci. ..,01. i().10 cc uL-- 1 IP/ / / ‘z. C• I • . • . . ... . J .. . „......... / 1 .,1'.. .. .2' ' id.I . ;Itt-.1-- . ',.----5:::.1.7. -.1) ..a.lip:_...:11:..l.,\‘Airloo'_-------:_.°_......‘2,. 10,:..0\::.. '''...''1,..ii,.:30:.,.. '... 7..„..71,1'''.. ...: ill'I'll'' . • ,,. . •' \ ' 1 A \ • 1 II i 011.:le II --..I'k S \-. \ .iLd \ 1 .: ( , i • Il 0 / ,... v,, . •• t .- •••• i'v-• 0 ! ii : 1 . \ ..•-V , itt,_,.--.-\ , . \• \ . It(„,\ .. ,.;* ,››, 0 . I %1 a illa di,i4 1,\s Tki !A./.. 72.1 101111151111:11. -4, VIII C 1\, • e • 0.t. t. ,,.),,, . \ „. I, %. 1 ' • . ' ' ,- 44.4•1'W• * o 0 . . . • • ' • 0„' 8.• '. I, • p 0 •' . 0.. • ft- :: : '\i . . , • or. 6 \ .'• \ - : li " 01001 ..- 8 ...,;-. '' • ..\ ' ,0 j ! ' f ; • ; 6 . \ : - e • 1 2; • ! ' ; I .>). ?>> lili • ' I •A a , I '•<tt t• I \ \ 4 . • \ • , ifi 4) \ , z: i, 09 \ \•.\ l': . \7". 0 , . • 19, . 1 . , 0 \ n,1 s' --;,- ---• --- -- ,.•?.. - ..I-. , • ci!) '0.-@5"I . • . 60111 • ' ' . nf • 0 0 1 • • I 11 . .. i 1 i91.I , .\ ... , • -----_ ___. cl. . cp --.... ----- -D ----."---.- •. .. --.... 09 4 l • . • 1 1 _I1 MO. -1-31r) --- ii.•:1 ?.,.1 • eillt • ! l l . •. : \ V•(e.'; _.......,. 11 VI \\\\ t • A ----- m c it • I f Au \ v- 1 • 0 i: . 0 p-i M 0 fr --i-m-.. ti • 1 • . • 1 3-C \ \ V % 1 i4\ .` ' . '''‘, • 4. t; ' 1 • - o z 11 c‘ 1 i 0 . "•- ' 0 ''t 11' ' I ..,.... . tr hgg • 1.. . '., j, . ill . , . 0 0- . .1.. • --, , • \2 \ \i ! , .• :,.IT I f‘ e ma • 'mt.-4., I 1----A z. . l• -. 7 tl I ‘ ‘ 'i. 111 ,V,Ir) • I I e ' . ') g•-• . ,! ! '.'•-• 0.....• 1 .• I no'. :- ., i . .t• ,. • . . i , . 9--.;,-- t i° 0 • : I . ' i." "2 03 11111118..% 3 1 • \ \ \. \19 la Cr g , 1 1.1 0 1 . ', ‘• _ 1 Ili 1 IN i It S .• t 1 I. ' t../1 u R N 1 0 106 - le ; e . • . c ' t • \ J1 ? g , z ,00001, ...-.',,, • • I2,.\.• 1 ..: , . --..• \0 $• 0l lili t g;1 1 0 o _,_._.1• _••.-_0 0 .0 o 1I•_..1 t 1-f,',t•:':,"..-.,4.,.I 1-,,4-,I,•1 I,, .•. 9 D _p .. . t 'L1 4 . 4 \ \ - 6 it • d-4 I' U)' . . --1-\ I I,' ' i ' . : • i . •1:‘, 7 • 0\. 1 S?" -\56- 2- - - ` ° II 1 :'•- •a.; ' '• : • ' • 11. k 133. • -I .. .. . \ •\ , • 1 ' . , \, fa le w.. I • ‘,.• i . . •. I • • 1 1 : b. i / . pt • ,_r- . \ .1g\ . ; . 1 ID 1• 1 a 1 • : I • ' , M.. 1X A I. 1° LA 1 I , 111 , 'I Ill 1 1 • •i ' ; CL • Z VI \ i . I I\ 1. ,, ,s. ts ,., ts t .,.: , • • •• 0 • • CL • . * • • • 1 .1 :I • 1.; 0 . I, e 0• A___-- 1.?P . 1 •1 • ,, : 1 .1 ;._...,. ' . r •---------a 1 : . ,4, .. .... ( . , : . IIII .. •, 01 . . ... . / 1 1 • 1 . 1 .• % : ;!.• • ; . • Toss . ; (0• . - • .p • > Ill I 4:31 •'•' '6 ". oit• . , ••• .1 1 3 . • . , • I P ZIA .901 • 1 ct • • !. ' I i . II r. • I mi 1 ! I ! • 1 I • I i IIIIL ••••• Uri \ \ • \ , I 1 •"1 . i* : f: I ' 1 ' I . ' 0 • • I; • • I: I. If 1 • .. Hdii I 1 1 1 ! I C ' I ..). a. Irt I rinIn B o i I : i i , . ,,:oL 1 1 ' .--7T,-, ..... , ,,,,L,t_ . ' 1 ; : It, t •. S. 6. \ • ! 1.1 ; • I 1 ,),, 1 - ,'4 ':' • 0 I - i e• i I Ell © ti 4. 0 1 1 • i , . 1 . , • I i • - 1 VI.‘41 I . 11 I • !.I 13. fp. . ) i / / ) 1 . ' I V I 1 I I.)(:' • • ' . ' ..?.•_-_.: '.I: .. ,.- , -, -.•-•1 5./ \ I ) 'le • .. : 1)4 . .. 1 . • c• 31. ' 9 • . - •-, 1., 111, ----1° ti - - i ' • . ,- . : 1 I ' • •= I 4'1 1° iTf i 11 id lilt 1 :1 ..-1 . ' „ ' ; • o , 1 il II ill • • ' POO i II • \L 1 , . 11 . I ri• , (0 i• ; . , . c 1 ei e.A.,t,t I 5 I 1 IF°: 1 .al. 1 i 0-- oi j I ,;•1 1 g 0 iit 11 1111 i . • 'I: iis) ; ME • 4'LA;cC, . 0 c IF, o' t ,• ; . ,( 0 1 lio _ ,:11 loo ° --.. • ii i\ . 1 0 . 0. • • , • _ ' . I . . v, , I ' I . • / . •• O . . Nil ly•l • ••• ____ filiatS, '------.-". -rh"1--!--.- -0 . /7- -"... k . • ' 6 , . . a) • . o ' o 237.14. • 90 . , ' • A • a ' ' ' I 13 . .. • . . o. , ' ' t••----Ift•-,,-t.? 5 . ______ . . _ - I Greg L..Allwine, AIA I ta . P.IC89. trtt:';'10-0.14. i''' :. . . o CITY LIGHTS APARTMENTS RENTON. NA. 0 . Llcij i.' : ii".`A,-' .,•••-e"-" Z rPOY'.. '1'' FOR WITH PAY DEVELOPMENT CCM:NATION co giue dale:Go 50.eff VII N.MOM. SUM'11. • ...7 1=1-1 TACOMA. HA 08408 12061 583-9400 ..la:.-g:. 0) , Latest re 1. r db 304 main ave.so.,suite 200 renton,wa.98055 12061271 7200 623 5732 Mel Easter, ASLA • - . ...• -:- : 1.•, '; ' - :...!.., . • . . . I . . . To POLICY DEVELOPMENT ,__200 Mill Avenue South1, Renton, Washington 98055 ES :,=J , i ; 9T4'0 SEPTE.gg ` 1 SJ id„ ! mETEF * * * z S� ' ‘ 19001660 * r • Daniel J Merlino 1425 S Puget Dr #E-1 Renton WA 98055 MER 25 242224Bi. 07/22/89 NOT:I:F"Y SENDER Oi=. NEW ADDRESS ME14fiIT T' ( ) WRONG FIRST NAME ON ORDER (e) SAME EXTRACT CODE::WR.ONG NAME mill ( ) 11O RECORD:< SEND 3575 • NOTICE OF PENDING SITE PLAN APPROVAL I RENTON, WASIIINGTON .- I A Site Plan Application has been filed and accepted with the Planning Division of the Community Development Department. /The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. DESCRIPTION: CITY LIGHTS APARTMENTS i ECF; SA-087-89 Applicant seeks siteplan approval for a 70 unit apartment-complex to-be located on a i vacant 3.3 acre R-3, Residential Multi-Family, zoned parcel. (Note: Density level has • been adjusted for greenbelt on-site.) GENERAL LOCATION: it ' East side of Benson Road between Puget Drive and South 26th Street. . PUBLIC APPROVALS: o Environmental Review o Site Plan Approval o Building Permit Approval j The application can be reviewed at the Planning Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval. For further information on the application or dates of final action by the City, please contact the Planning Division at 235-2550. • • II ` `7 I �' WINS O N ti' ' � ;- I WONJN.LION 1 l i Nur NCNOC� _ -- �' % Pi ) 11, I. POMO i. - R -�,_.- � -0 -. //////////// = — > I a� I. 1• ° / PROJECT SITEI ;i a .f-- .) r . Oil-. I 7///// 1.N■/N►TNNNIN CMINCN f "- _ 1 N './ , 1, g 1 i r 11 . . - i.J .mNtwlirs t , P bJO I - Y�G. mot"•7 er,i'.--:-'•• • "-"j L--- tv•i'&.6z9.4Q, 1 it lk 1 ::a b.)-6 .tr. ''... , ....Q. / .p.P.,irCtraggrj 7%:-''Q;4: !. • 11. 1-,9 -‘19 f i . PPJ- (-4.0 ,..:::.----- °Ltr-6,-?..41_`17------ -lb Jr, ' . - . -1::V- `4,----31c) ! i•—t-______._,...-c*-C-V" et • ' ''C\.1 ; I X .\ '‘''.'"'L'i .- • ••!..,k.. -. II i 1 • ... :"_ ----------- -, -=--•-----.. _. .. .. .._.--.---...._ . — -v....-_ ,. , 1 1 •/. . , . I�1� -50' WATen •cP.* ——J #Y4 . l • :> l 1., ... . • • • . \ ,:. , i\\t • l . • I __J___ . • _____ , .._____ . . , . r . ,.... : . ,,... . : • • o A . • i I i I\• ‘.is•\ • NININ C\ •• • / .• 1 •• ;I /J I �, ti C� 1 , I \ I ql �r . ' •I, f� fp n1�n i °14' ® . titt0 A 0)) c11 . i 1 -‹-• C '� O I • 1 ‘.I I' g..lit. _......-cr .e t ,,,,, e •aIlk ry1,k, i p ! o b •t' • 1 7` �4 • d .)) r .moo i°1 ° ° I •. A, . I I • 1 i • I 'I I- t°d • • I yryo I 11111 Wyel Cj 11 • 000000 ` �n• gs �, :e � � - - °Ig ; : A 51 I • IE1, t A r \ i �\'O\� �- _ 1 I •i ' I p � • ,•. , ‘..(no / 1 b I I- • r. It 1 �� „ $gm ® E • 1 1 . 1 ' t • „ 3c 1 1 1. sZ , ■ I u, �, o. • 2 4�R Ll�, 1 ��y I� p i y. —L < Om it :Ir � ` ' �1 NI1 IN• -I-I- 11 -Of,•• �J i .j I ly 4, \ I ■ i. , u Irb 6_ �u , cif'^.�i ; 443• , y1� J- •{I ! r I of : o • , p I ' a • 1 11' n111n 1 1 i • Q 1 m \ \ ,\ .\ s i �ii ® • ° I • I • �1 Z 1 I in ° i ° • o I u • N •z \ 1 1 , rOR I. ' • fo • • v I , 4k° ,� • -\• .,,,::g_tt * 1 \ , O d co ` %° Q p ... (,.�- cf 4 Stu j I 1i ; . \ * 16. ,-;( ° P 1 E ID. -p ' V I '• 1 i. b- 1 l -- ® . jjj0 ;' -1 I • , 4. 3 • 4D I �� c .'le . . ;�\ , ,r 1 II� 1 Q. Z ;',.;..I ` I O ■ I17p1 ;i t , . i gi . i 0 (..• / II . 1 I j .>; I . • ,'i..�`a . 1I4J _II of C-� ;'.)oI , . \ \ �, ,IN. I q i ' 'i ('I11i ' .�C7_ -c —�— i II I 1 • 4 I:\ .. i : 1 I 11 nt. I , b. ill ' 11 i I 1 1 I , C f ! i .0 111 .' a-`P •. o; . I 7 . 1. — =-1 a 1-1 . ' I= I�_ nln ,II I)! 1• I '1 I n •, +- • _gi �l I `- • • i ' u .O :. � II'll�lr r . n• ; �I in1 ! C.XI q • ,'1 Ito ' , : I� 1 A. c 1 11 l !1111 ` 0 i , , , , ,, 1 , • ,/ ; : 1 I° o O° cI g. i .1° I coii . )1 iiii' : 0 .. ' ---*-----77- ...•iyae•SI .:—+-0-, . --:...,---1_. . 1 • II-- - -- — - — — Greg L.Allwine. AIA '\\ lit/ ° ° r 1'Q��..•,• `' '' CITY LIGHTS APARTMENTS wii1016 WA. -.!.•" f� •rlFt •) �.'.1•F..;1 H •• lJ f01, WITH PIT RKIOA(NI[OfpYIIOM WA.',I n.:i.11tet 1 C I 'Issue dale:e.•so e l 0O,N.NIIrs o1 SUM'f .i I I t.tf/4 NA WOG 110e!0,-ff00 -t i ..e�.:.:I R CD u Latest rev n.A,•::11,,,. L ' ' Met Easter, ASIA 1"n ' ' __ A�� 304 main ave.SO.,suite 200 rerllon,wa.98055 (2061271.7200 623 5732 o, 8�^ � � o POLICY DEVELOPMENT 200 Mill Avnuoo South Renton, Washington 98055 �w �y rwF/r»/ - -_. . . NO SUCH #---ATTEMPTED QNNN0NN--- Danid VV Kent INSUFFICIENT ADDRESS---REFUSE0~- 4629 121at Anc NOT DEL A » A0}RESSED UMABLE TO Bellevue WA 9E FORNARD ACA��T UN ED---- / ROUTE � INITIAL ' TU --'—__-�_ WRITER � C�b'�3 • .! i • NOTICE OF PENDING SITE PLAN APPROVAL il RENTON, WASHINGTON A Site Plan Application has been filed and accepted with the Planning Division of the Community Development Department. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. ' `' • DESCRIPTION: CITY LIGHTS APARTMENTS j ECF; SA-087-89 1 . Applicant seeks.site plan approval for a 70 unit apartment complex to be located on a vacant 3.3 acre R-3, Residential Multi-Family, zoned parcel. (Note: Density level has .H • been adjusted for greenbelt on-site.) • . GENERAL LOCATION: II East side of Benson Road between Puget Drive and South 26th Street. PUBLIC APPROVALS: i o Environmental Review o Site Plan'Approval o Building Permit Approval The application can be reviewed at the Planning Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative-site plan approval. For further ! information on the application or dates of final action bythe City, y, please contact the Planning Division at 235-2550. .i • f . --------. y / 1 . -- I I Nl11MO OLN li NfLNO `ION = ; NUN OCO _ 1[: "3-%\ikt\ I . iI _----J � -,, ll /f : ::: ; j i' �a I ! 1!�i.' rLL- 8 1 --.........s. . -a i -_--.11L.............. , II . / 71-- • z ; . r, I I . PROJECT SITE I %r =' . O a I; i n`I / i ::: CN J-�- r i L- - / • • s".•• t..9 k5i% '':::•••••.! 1, ..•P,..7-9.r" C--IiiLlYSA,..\?.." . • O'r1:1----)-I.:4 __,.... ,,. .: -o/ IQ. -..4.. N,.. .. , , • offis . i. . / ..p.Prforcirq \.. ---0_,,,,Q ,?,z)rt.. ,_ii-1- ‘)." 9- I --7 -, . i . .S3s2P----0 .-- %-,d?- 0 k..11...-T --7—,---/- --„_,.\--- ,e. ./ ...• .� � �\ -.�•' •\cNNNN.IiMNLN NN.NNImas. . Y. .' *. 1 a • ii . I: ' I Ii I • ' • II I ' I "I I 1 • t I /� '• , 1 I, 1 • /i •• r . t�1� ZO. WATIJt FuercP•WI.f� `• l• t. . .J '• ` r\1 I • / ' N T•s.es•/ I J •1f.0Y - ' i• ) . - „ \ .• • • .. , 0. t- . ,.• 1•1 —L o •• .-\ e. -1,, — • o •�,•,•/\ \ ))> ,* C • • ° ° • 11 1s•I ,I •� •�INljIv . �VA e I . 1 t ' : ( . • 11 O GY 1; �o o ,, b °: w- • . \ 9. i ,. oC Ir IIFr I\ nb Ml C . I . .. • \ 1 ' u I ♦i ft. et •itY O o �" 1 , •• I \ : 1 NI'i. Still ` _O f o� °,y , : . 1 01 , ®i 1 w rr 1 W f " �i ' i • Z, I M • \ \• •..\ • • AI -• UIg 4 { w 6 \ \\I • „it— --- ---- 00e* ..‘,...' . * i . • i .. It U t1. ii _ *l„e.r4_ 010. • I ' 0 1 n_ 4•, 0 1 1 I 1 \I 1 . * 1 :. . . 1 qp , . V\c`" ., \ ...,, • ., ...-..,_ \ • if • . ...... 1 c • vey �, 1 \ r III NII'IN 1 1 1 ii e U J • , v i • • 0___. .C*M6.i �.y ,••• I 11 • 1 1 I ; 41 01 : O o I iir: R I i1.1 r KI" i.j 1 i I • ® ..1. • l I QQ . i r. ; 1 • r1 1 „ '.. S • 1 • ° l I S i A i , nlr'In : •O' ° 1 ` v I • 1 .. o } 01 -. ° ett, I ir,...11_, ___,______, • u . T., 1 \. ,..d 1— ....-- —__A1. T ' ' 1 . , ` 9� O � • N ° ..,r • l _ v' "I': 6. b vlv , 1//0 . .. . \ \ c . 1 1 .u — v. 0 .. . : ok ' ''Q D I �j NA . 17, 1 (61. i , , I • . Z 1 . p , cc <I I I , , •) i can : _--- I I : : !�•I!' • I • °, •(a I= I MN ?I'h 1 0l O ' tt••l-�,1 1 Z ' 9�1. ■ MN I Q j ' •I I'll: 1 I r' II • xT —__ i' I 11 I .i•I \ I� c. I 11. Io ; • � fib, ffil' < i � iI ;� 1 1 ; I� I\. 1L. "(Ink L i' © r i . i . j 1 ' I ` 1I r I� t..1 e'.d f•'•d S ol,I 1»NoLL,�/• I�. W.. I i n I i ! 1 1 �Y ' Mp +� ip • 1 i'' IIi ' O n 1 'IIo • 11 I1I+'11� ! 1 Iil I!1 1 1 ` ll i��1E1 °• .� i o '°' 1 I I M""C? -`l, _ �" °Oe © . 0 t io ' (0' " II I .! ' O.I 4:474.:14. I •,, 11 ' IL: • °° •II 0j 7 '8Ni ! ��I ' '• / tir-) --- - - -- ---- . -------- --------- Greg L.AIIwIne, AIA Ii!I, Pr eCl• no Il 1�r.,� te i8..l,-..',''' •,,:.. � CITY LIGHTS APARTMENTS �xro MA. • II �v , la!1^]; :•;,'�J,K'1 • FOR Iamx PIT att I car•uf1an u•a.•i•+e;;grccc C "Issue dale:o•x•q •)I N.Nuac•. SUM'r .-! ut•K N. IR10N earl 9o,d.0o _.`Y'.r .3.;a:iin p) latest rev '' r'�� ` i.�':;• ., ( MelEasler, ASLA rn• � 304 main ave.so.,suite 200 Fenton,wa.98055 (2061271.7200 623.5732 or KA, A 4, 1,. POLICY DEVELOPMENT ,., _ 200 Mill Avenue South ....IR - Renton, Washington 98055 , . i • - Ai•-'4 ,-,'. . .. . . ,/ ; ; G.:_- .,,,;-,.:- .u.0 ri::si,•-kut.- -;;-__•?::?: 7'1';-7- !.... •e., '..:,f"- i t:I() MIL i i.17:- .777-:7; ;t,‘.... ,* l?'00 q0' '-, f-7f-1! •1 *-I !r-si * dc,C' ' L 20 '8g P".. ---,. i••••:.- , ,...• ;\\ „ SEP'C ' ._, .....,., . BET 25 24/2333N1 07/23/89 '...-- - ' ,--i RETURN TO SENDER NO I-ORWARDING ORDER ON FILL UNABI...E TO FORWARD • Ray & Gloria\ R Bethers 1425 S PugetRd #315 Renton WA 98 55 t ELivt,RASLE,:;:-.. .-. - — 4 6-----) A DO 6261 S ;, P:',-7::c.-'ED ...- > ': iA,E'_E TO FORW.P1-, — 'i .. - INV ,•-'' I - E!LRN TO 'WRITER '11483 '''' IIELIiii:Eld!Ild!LIIIII 1-_,---- i 1 1 :1 1, i .I • i • NOTICE OF PENDING SITE PLAN APPROVAL RENTON, WASHINGTON A Site Plan Application has been filed and accepted with the Planning Division of the Community Development Department. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. , DESCRIPTION: CITY LIGHTS APARTMENTS ECF; SA-087-89 Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 70 unit apartment complex to be located on a vacant 3.3 acre R-3, Residential Multi-Family, zoned parcel. (Note: Density level has • been adjusted for greenbelt on-site.) i GENERAL LOCATION: i East side of Benson Road between Puget Drive and South 26th Street. PUBLIC APPROVALS: • I o Environmental Review o Site Plan Approval o Building Permit Approval 1 The application can be reviewed at the Planning Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval. For further 1 information on the application or dates of final action by the City, please contact the Planning Division at 235-2550. I I ' I • II I g' SPAM OLIM II ' raucr.u.�mM ! ' MN ae q. I / ,,,, •: ;I --___:.„, i-., � L1L _ICKOO4. ;�4 it--vi g---___� - i c. , 1 ' 7 , • 7, , . ,,Tr.'''. - • ''- r1� l' �j ri ,i ! a ``-------------- --1-71—. a I i s. —1 7. ', i , • / PROJECT SITE ! ti y- -"' u • o - O. iic:::j ::: ; i �I / ,'rlfaaarTaMMM CIMMCM /7///. C 11 1 �!]. .�- .ICT�aJP,lM7■..T. T T 31 ,'.:14 L---Z).;:41-Q--1-4161- ".-Q . I e cid psyks,for .__,„,r, • �} 4:11ucz 9. W .,,i.,q PP--los?..-- %-4?-50 i —\-•7. ! ..i.—r_ .."1".\-:\ cf N.)1M101.12110111.11NUOIENTIAL • . . ./ .. \+);-?. I "</ *. %. ' . . .‘,1. J.: . • ii I . I 1 I • 1 ,• , 1 I I / ' I. 1• k-'1- -50 wcTPA cr.wre(---� � 1 t•- i• 1 •` I iI I 1\-i1 i ' I I .. �. �•. • . I it,\•\ .t,___--,-\ 11111 (DI, 0 v r . 1 1 1 • .1 • Nlr'INL' ' \ 1 ) I _, i• q Cell° . ii 1 •- \iiii IN, 10, 0 . k Co ; ) 0 . .. A_ . 1 ; . \. 1. i ) . i p • • ‘A.:(..) C • k-.. ) ... \ ..,\\.•.., 0 i• s-• nm -• t - ,„ : • • .• \\4; 4 V \ . ..,..e. . : . , , A, : c•)! I . .! •i T , 1. t W .. 0 t : 1 UUU E, •' i 1 • I i t pMpM \, \..\ .. : ' '_--- - ° $ • a © T ' .i0I11 • • III .t . q Iii ill• \ \Ill • -%7•1 ,,,,,,.. _____...._o 0 k cc, 0 4 I . i 1 p n \ . 0 - 1, -.--.. 6 1 - • .. gia 44'of �•j 1 I I I • ' tK V0 I . m - . r • 2 rpp 1 • ,� t,�r p 'nO i ,� � I , \!4 9 11 l 'I" r Q a mu :ol t-.mob• . • 1, \ . >I>�> I- I •`, oar- ' 0 i , N r N 1, • I • 1 11_ c*Ane 1 4••aaa.� F 1rw ` Z i. , Ml11 � 'ri of r r Ri0. 0 ' , , • • O • O 1 w - I r .• •. 0,1\ . \ 1. ,:.11 \ 8. ;11 ID !1• c,' 0 , , I 1 ? q Z 1 1 0 1 °••••• I . 01 4-04... ---- \--- --__ • 1 1 : . - • 0 1 410 ,,,,, \ 1 _.. .. IS • • r o7 , Ib \ \\* ... ."-:-.c-L:i e—r----:::--0------°- ° IQ• t . , \: C•I. l'-'"U \ g I : ' 1 1 1 I l'-1 - ; • 1 ; , I ' ' gi g ,... ! • \ 3;\ \ 'i\ aZe C b. C ° .'\..�r •Iv i (�S` I ' O ar i 0 • . ii I • IS , . ii'• . • . 1r II 'ANi., 1 , ag ; " 1 . !fir: • 11II•3 ; • \ ', _ b j , i ' I, . I ; I.111 I : 1 cm.it 1 • ; . 0 , - 5 \ . i .6 1 t i ;.I O :: I�� • 1 ifin I 1 I !! ,gJ I : •'L': ) !. • ■ N 1 y r C. G o I : 1 . i A ' I j1 [ lid I 14 o f i t I 1 I II ) ; Gc I S : U Clio to,'111 ' I110 ,! f I • '�a�'� o I o I I ' I i ' /0 Nil i (30 ° . ! I. ( I ! • -1) 1,. / .a.•.arf•t� •• ! . 1 ,1 ;_t 1_F._ : !1 i wI •/ �i•l. �: II/1 1►•al'11 - ----- : `10• • • l : ' • I . 11 rr..: • 1 -------_________ --- --' -- --'----------•--—----------- Greg .Allwi AIA Ili.;: o ;,;PV1114�42.•••'�• CITY LIGHTS APARTMENTS RENI NA. :; g '` 4 ;ktjra�vlil; ':`: Y 1:�� r•t •m,•en°tvnoxrrt tIM•41rC„ ,..,•:.,•.r cn ,;cn ,Issue dale:o•50'61 en N.HAMA 1e1tt•a• TAM A.WA Kim avel 75S-WA°e 'l'F',.i 7.;T; 10 Latest rev I •Alb ro ni N • • '__. .. 304 main ave.so,suite200 renlon,wa.98055 12061 271 7200 623.5732 Mel Easter, MLA I ' v, • ' • CITY OF RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT -- - JUL 2G '8S ?y s)U ,* 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 *j; r * i 9i01FG,j George M Stephens 1425 S Puget Dr #J-1 Renton WA 98055 ca Tli: s-s... 242224Ni. RETURN TO ;iE .ttt NO 1=*UFi4Ali`-tfiL):T:NL; 1l"1 1__•t1F:ylrlFt[) l�1�1i :etitt:ll i NOTICE OF PENDING SITE PLAN APPROVAL RENTON, WASHINGTON A Site Plan Application has been filed and accepted with the Planning Division of the Community Development Department. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. DESCRIPTION: CITY LIGHTS APARTMENTS ECF; SA-087-89 Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 70 unit apartment complex to be located on a vacant 3;3 acre R-3, Residentiai-Multi-Family, zoned-parcel. (Note: Density level has been adjusted for greenbelt on-site.) . GENERAL LOCATION: East side of Benson Road between Puget Drive and South 26th Street. - PUBLIC APPROVALS: o Environmental Review o Site Plan Approval o Building Permit Approval The application can be reviewed at the Planning Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval. For further information on the application or dates of final action by the City, please contact the Planning Division at 235-2550. : . ---- --= ---=-=y 1I - I /1= 1.. f I • same lam ruacr.i�.Hme = '1 sa ee q� . • __ .) ii -- �„ , . 1 1 ii ��-L- _-,� U1 J r W I I t_ - i-1�•-� /' O ~ /////////// -- - • C3V f{1{ I ; / PROJECT SITE ! /� -: C y' Q� �, MI / i IClsCtrinum CORMCM , I-. 1 el. P .......,,• i ! i Lit-- /7/// / i s• . g ;1 i----Jr fl 1 i - - �r ��, Y1ClaIA11lll{IflC . • • • • • i 1 4 1 // • I 1. I� --SO' WATER.R, or. '. l t., •\ \ \ / (, . I N ;or or t I tt«!.O!' • l/ ', j• \ I j ••• • +� • ' I I ( / // _. , ,, ,, , . \ •'.I. .r.-----<"\ , ?rr 6) 0 .. , .. 1.` 0 , 0 c. • I( \ 1 ,'1.•. •.NINIi • ••, C CC 1 •• • r ' 1 ior.: i Il ` 5. • • r. i� i n°k' �t ` ° b • : i . , :z::::: \ .t \. a • ` \ NINIi II- o ifi i i~ °;_ ( ••• d , • • ti � s• :1 :- ; � _ Q� 0;• S I ,• II . 1 • a n c-1 \ •,t 2-1 �••' p 0 '• ° ,+0. ! I MO. • I • \ I • 1 1 " '; • \ �i �rr ��t , 11'._\ % •' •. 1 •� upong — — -_74- 0,,.. 0,.„ ! . . , i �'\ ' • • '• It $T 1 c h o o F.1s �'��� �0 II I I • • _, . 1 :1 \ \ • . . 5 \P \ , 'I 0 NINIi - 1 ' �-ND `� IL 1 „ou A : 1 II este••• I1 - 104 dl°- 1,• t t 1 el I • 0 1 I a 0 \ lv orin 6-• : i1 1 •• • �_ ,II v r 1. 1:11 \ \ ...., ,) is S t.6 1 @ .,4 0, o I i 11 1 $ oIrIn 0 r , 0 , 0 ii 11 I 9 u VI\ \ . -..7.7.-.:i---6;•sla Tr-1-13- —— -•• ' icL 1 \ \ ., •-•—•.- • b o I ' . , I i • ° be 117 '4 . i ; . : is, _ 0.. sonwii ii, ig _il_\,7 . , , . . st =. i A t\ v-,., 77 u I e • , e• t . • ." • 41, r...., . m DA): ' " \ 1\ . . ,, \ 11 b. 1,-;..1 . p r. t. / N I •I , • I I II L \ 1I '• _ I • I ; 1 = Fo o• =I b. o ----- ,'i Cl)CD j. 1 i I . A I, ` s aillIIa \ 1I• I 1 , II Io. 1j b i I i ' I ' I 1 -S110 C i• • D. 1 i I. 1 '•9. ' l• � e • o,I' s 1 \._______,R g .—lo '. . , � I I > 9 1 1 -\)-.. ..I. 43. >1>° °_ J p R� `7 v` ' I I •• I '. 1 1,i • ' I I� 'lilt' •1 ° t l� rr ° O° t 11 1 ss °' I i i ° c 1 tt t 1{1)1)` 19 4• ' �'�e� JI S o o a I o pi I ' r (D 1 °' IAj it •I ° v0 C t• p' \i I i I r la �� i ' .LC? e 010. N it tr or kr. - 4l•l4f(Cihati. , -- — — -- = - i Greg L.Allwine, AIA I \�Jli!1 r r :_P.r,,•q:•' 104401i CITY LIGHTS APARTMENTS FENTON, NA, 7 ;"•S!1�;¢•,;�< rae MUTT en ocvuocxlrt ffetmAtta CIssue date:o•50.61 en N.6t(o+n. SUITE•t. a.L': ,••:ungcr Lalest rev.i, MO NA. SA ee.oe Ixet SeS uoo ,;a co . .s. • - ` =- a___�b 304 main ave.so.,suite 200 renlon,wa.98055 • (206)271.7200 623.5732 a Mel Easter, ASLA } , • v R� •► �'o POLICY DEVELOPMENT imR 200 Mill Avenue South 9 Renton, Washington 98055 l z�r =?; -t ?�>>1 09 ec, f JUL 2G '89 :. a"" ;%Jju I;v - .r) SEPI°I \ i \I! , ! Y &r n S. `d u i - METER' • * * I_.C)R 25 :2 1 2 1N:l 07/22/89 RETURN TO SENDER NO FORWARDING ORDER ON F":I:L_.E UNABLE TO FORWARD Robert C Lord 1425 S Puget Dr #E-5 Renton WA 98055 IIIIttfffltlitlifitjffhifiIIIlit}JffllffIttltifitIi • i NOTICE OF PENDING SITE PLAN APPROVAL i RENTON, WASHINGTON A Site Plan Application has been filed and accepted with the Planning Division of the Community Development Department. The following briefly describes the application . and the necessary Public Approvals. DESCRIPTION: CITY LIGHTS APARTMENTS j ECF; SA-087-89 •.. Applicant seeks.site plan- approval for a 70 unit apartgnent complex .to•be.located on a vacant 3.3 acre R-3, Residential Multi-Family, zoned parcel. (Note: Density level has • been adjusted for greenbelt on-site.) GENERAL LOCATION: East side of Benson Road between Puget Drive and South 26th Street. PUBLIC APPROVALS: o Environmental Review o Site Plan Approval o Building Permit Approval ' The application can be reviewed at the Planning Division located on the third floor of • Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval. For further information on the application or dates of final action by the City, please contact the Planning'Division at 235-2550. ... - -- • -----•-'---! �� ---- —u �. _.. .. • LIMING GUM II �``` `�` . �/CN�00~�IaN ; !: !MI NCNOM 1•/ ".�\ !i • it j%. "'*".'71.1,,,.,.....1 . 1.. .._ -77-• •_•_• _• -- c I ::--j514i a �` //// , , MN CNYIICN I• 6.115' 1 ! lia,•-ltilt ......01441),\ • \ ..... .7 . ` • '6.0PORN 01 = •jr�,� --?X ...C1P- ‘113115.- "‘::::::--0 IL-( /,..1 --- ''' -17.r,\- - , . 1 .<\i_j—?. I / ..>—. . . •sL-& ,. / PsPs spa.110 ) %6L9).20 4n4);&)1,,tr.l . )49 i • - F. I: l i . 1 • 11 • • • • . . 'J . •. ...._ .._ ..-._.-. ' __ ., • ; • '• - ii . i .• IS I .'• ' .1 1 1 '•I/ .. f'. i. .• (----11 -5d wATer..lao.roe•Wm--7--s-7--ii --1.0r 1 %, .‘' ‘. . ‘••••••••• ..•• , . •, , II r Or 111.i i ' • j\ :'• 1 \ (( • 1 :. I • .. r 7 • • • / .. ....- . t% ., i : ( . 1 ; A. 'I-radii . . . \ '.......!•. 1 I : /. —1—• -7. ' • 43,-7- I, . % i • •-•/...'/- ... ... , • , , . .: . , .11• /\.•• • f_...043. i (... 0 • , .11 ...• .' / . ..'• i .../.__7.c.7.- . \ I II Il' ) 111113%II 4 e ° % 6 . ' I, 'sge• ./.- • . • t' , .• •• >> . 0,0_,\, ..4 ‘• , 1,'•i \ .. 111 11;.,1,.., ,. .. • .. ... / , .• . . I,'' 1 11!' ..---.:--) 1 101111r71.4 e, . (3.1"..••••%\kit---‘,...,,, , . • \ t '' .. . .1, , , \ 1 ... . i , . .. -e--- • .9. ,%,.. 1 . 1 lk. Ili llii A -t• v... I 1 1 • ' \• i ) • . \ ir .t 'Nt • .0 0010 0 0 b I 1 o u • 0 44•0 • ; 0 . . P. ____er‘ •e t gi, . . 0 • 6 . . !„,0 _, • • — % , i\ • S r Ah 1 ' . ' 11r,10 . S• 1 ' t •cT I,- !..•.. •.A, >•••t I \\\,,1• .V.\A\ 11.,: V Vr. Ip3 11oC0 ° 0 I.I, ;, . iI•1,OA 0bi . I 1 ' 1 .•7 • • • , 1 .• 1.1 '-•---- ' e , 30 I 1 • , i It '. . .t % A •;- ilf'r‘% \... • II lit _— ---% alg .01 : r , i 116 \ \ .. 41,. \ ...... ....•• ) % • El' i • . . olil • ' • 1 t 11 0 Ili! \ 1 • ---.1- --- ____ ! 1 • \ \.(it 1 - -o -... ....__ _ 4.0.\ 06. ° Itet ,III 11, :I.; ii •ii I 1 I . , ' 171 gill? •\ • ..1\ • ---- 6 g si • ii A AO \ V,f,• ' ---''' '..1 4%• .;1!; . •, a • ill III r. O 2,- 1 1 „ • 7 . . .T.'- ' 1 '. - 0 0,, ....t., O. i 1 43 . \ 1\ \ / ‘ , , . ••„•,..., it ic, 0 , II • ,,, ,%. • .., , „ - , . • . . , \ , ., V . \'i.'1 \ • .•1. , >, Id: 9 * ,•4..... ..7.•(11° 4. * I l's•-•.a;fr. • „I' t 1 et L , 1 \ , ‘ c.,/ •, .. , • 1 . ,, . 1 . d 9 6_ 1 0,.••••`" • ‘1. .___' '•ir'''`..,t \ :' 11111111ri.\II. • •. . ' .. . \ I 1 I 01 • . .•, 0 • ! • 0 . • . • . re 0 0 , _ i A \ • ., P. • • -6 i i , 1• 6 • .\ \ „-1 •\ S t .II 1 (t) ' i o l•: ° \ . ... j\ id 1 rvi - • ‘ t • 010p ; A . . . , %, . , „ vo; \ 11 1 ol . ; ., 0 0 1 1 ( ,. ' • „ 101111100. 00 ' . • 0 •,. a • 1 4,1 p . v. ••••• .0 o 1 1 1 ----\- ' . >, ' \ ) _. -.±. -..........._00_ - __° _._i_i_.1..4, ri.,..1..] I --J . . c_ • -i-A ,3 1 1 , , -..-_-__„\____,....,,-_ -ar-9- ——••• 1 \ —•..------III „ ;13.—46,- . --— RIO AS ... .0 IS = i .. _, % t , . • u% \' --- ----------- 0 .. , , • CO • • o 0 , • w • : \ , 1 T; • \o , iiiii. 1 a le \ (re • • , I • l 1 .0 11- 1-,'. ..; = • •-; \ .• \ . \ t 9 4.; 11• - Co , ,, 0 Jo\ ,.% _ , . • " : • , , . i,2 • - m . " . 1 1 • I %. ' ,1;•-. e;.,), 1 i . . ,... _., . • ..2 .•r . . - , ; 0 1. 1 i , • li $ . = 4> . . I • . , _g \.•,. I , I ; • C. 'le' '44 , • % 1 . , ... 1 CL i • 3k 1 A 111 (• • • • \ 1 • „ tHx cs %., ,. 1 Z . 1 • __ . :I 5 \ 1 6 e0•1 Iv, i 0 . ,. . , . 1 . . . 1 . , . • , ... . IF I 1 11 i• (i) • : • i I T 1 INN 1 .. i. . . 1,.• • • • . i. ,. • ... El .. • ! 1.• „, Alt I oi . .,.. • teislita• ,k,• • , • • 1 1 - . • . 3 . • 0•a i .1 [. I.1 1 P• • I "1 CI 1; \ __ 1 • 1 ; .. I . ' I I 1 , ! I 1 1 . I I \• I • -I•, . • : 4; ' I 0!' II ' I(3 1 • ! ! 1, I . 1 ' ; • \C i " • ' iii rytlo 0 i: • 1 , - 11. I: i ,..' 6 1 .1 . 7(Tre, . ..00 • •e-c? ; • ' o. t • i . 0, _ \ ;o..., ;MM. .... ••••••...Am.. ._ 0, • I .I • Plop = •- .1 III "Ilii- • ' il I ' ; !• EN. i,f la 1 . I e • i- 0 r ;7.' :.• i, . . 9, 1 Ir . - 1 - . „,... .. - .. , .. . . . . .. . : mi6.0- 1 . ,,. o 6. • 0, !'• 11.1a1 c7-153° 1 ° . 1 . , ( • • .. . . . 1 ( • Z i 1 \ I 1 •• 1 'f, ! I; i j 1 1 • ' I i : I. 1.I ill iilit D.. q,/ i • 11 \I . ,• lab cs . 1E 11 , . . ; 1 ill q 10. to , , i - • it II,1 : • ..: 1, , e„v„ , • • 4,-Ae • .: : i 1 ic, 0, lit 0 0 , 0 : ! L . , : . . 0 1 . . • •• P ......... 10 M.:I 1‘ / °° 0 --. • 4, • ,. ,.....1._ y , 1 , ____ • . .1 ! ! ', ! I '...;1 . I,• / , , .;. ,. ...,.....-3.-..m.„... .., „.• _ . H I i Nes friar IP - • . , ign) . . • ' o II?tc Po 13 ' ' . . • 44, ' • ' ' .i . :1 , ir-..,,,,... . • . . p, ti.:••••......... \ .='. I . ' i.y.4..._7.:•ii,-1,:.--r.1 = • _ . __. . I Greg L.AllwIne, AlA I i ' ;- N1..2'. to • PlOckikilOt.i%).*•* • . , CITY LIGHTS APARTMENTS PENTON, MA. § 1-- -1/4:?) Y 160, 1- ' •1\:, Y,..i:.• VAR MITA PAT 0011.170.0.1 tOrIPCIAATION WA.•.....:••••:••.itcr R • 'ILiue dale:c,•50•51 031 A.MIMEO. SUM.0. Mark VA 141400 I2061 543,1•00 -i.i."..17.!•F...i.ir* ' m latest rev , ••.dil , , Mel Easter, ASLA I • co ' 304 main ave.so suite 200 renten,wa.98055 (206)271-7200 623-5732 • • •,••• "•'•1(.1 . • •-• •••• ' 1''' t, ' • , • •j•'• . . • • .• • •i: ., ,. :,,- • • Or if,4, ...k lit A ), „:„. 0, POLICY DEVELOPMENT : ... . ... . , - -, \ ,•,..s. ,,,:•:--., u..) t'LL:iAbt.-J-k:-)\----_ 200 Mill Avenue South T 7 '--..1,--- -.1-t-i will. 0 f '..----=--,-----;! , .., — IA * Renton, Washington 98055 I JUL 20 -89 .-“,".--`-'''',-,- 'z 1 i 1*1 ''''''' *?... -, , ,..— .., 1\\ . . e•;,.., 7,- --4., .?-4-0 sEp-cs-0 WA SY.- •-:----;,. I ,9001F471"; * * * / -------- -' 1 Jeffrey W ogers 1425 S Pug t Dr #216 Renton WA 9 055 ROG ',.1'.5 2142333141 1-WO 'TIME O EXP S. ROGERS'JEFF :1807 212N1) AVE SE. aSSAQUAH WA 98027 - RETURN TO SENDER ihh,kddh.ddulthd.hdhdhduLAN . • • ' NOTICE OF PENDING SITE PLAN.APPROVAL RENTON, WASHINGTON i A Site Plan Application has been filed and accepted with the Planning Division of the Community Development Department. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. ii 1 DESCRIPTION: CITY LIGHTS APARTMENTS ECF; SA-087-89 . i Applicant seeks siteplan` approval Cora 70 unit apartment complex to be located on a i vacant 3.3 acre R-3, Residential Multi-Family, zoned parcel. (Note: Density level has • been adjusted for greenbelt on-site.) . I• GENERAL LOCATION: I East side of Benson Road between Puget Drive and South 26th Street. • i PUBLIC APPROVALS: o Environmental Review I o Site Plan Approval I o Building Permit Approval :': , The application can be reviewed at the Planning Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval. For further .information on the application or dates of final action by the City, please contact the Planning'Division at 235-2550. .i _ ; ---� ------•-_-_' I� — —I '� 1 • 1 1 1 ti RAMS OLIN i `�• �- NLLOOILJ1-1110N I j i ILOE OC qL - i /�j�"'�1,`t,11 Elie i /1 �L� 1 1• � -�'�1 1 1 • i/ _ y r 11 "-I-7V .71-- ' . - --- i s ( C3 may' ' a PROJECT SITE I 17 --------::::•,...„ ��JJ �' 1 i . ° 1f--_ -_ __ ' : ; iI & IP/ 1'M WO CNUIItN 7 1 0 ‘,-... .1.. - III ,7 it J 11,, �- , • ,61 ,('} V�C rurT� so' dam-- =} _+••C b. ../ '^ • 49 1 • . �% er'- - j1 � _7\ ./ ` •��M\nern+ar • • 1 .-c • • II,, ' . . i . • • ' . . . . . . • .. . . . , • • . . ,. • . . . J . . . . 1 • 1i - ti '. 3. . 'A II ..• • .1 1 i /./ • (' . i ,. t.-I---------.so' wmen., ruestror.0"•-•-------4. \ k ‘• •, , 1 'N i Or 1111*II . 1 j\ . \ ‘ \ ( I( . i 1 i I , . , i • _.....,---" - • , . ... ... ). t .: ,. I E • ..., .• oe • / . --% . . ,! it • I '.1 •• • • • „ k i ! . \ ,••• 1.:I A.• o • 0 * ° ' '0. , 0 . • . .• I 1111 (0, 0 c. • et Ve St e .6% . ".. .ite• ....,•-• .. . - ?iv 0-9--\ '. ‘,%\. . „, c, 0 \ I', ,A ..- • v_JI''', f•Z, , A , , .. • / ,. • , , 64. • . _. ...<-_, ips..--1:14, .9 iriA ,..,,,‘0 : ;• \ , i , ..( . . a ), 1 i . 1 -• 1 . 1 Is l ot ‘,e. _ do cint0 .t t % ‘ . ° il r' ' r. I 11 , . V \ i ) \ .5. '1.. , - t ii. ,.... 0 • R. • I ) o, •e t,t e) I \ A 9 0 • . ? t- (0. , !‘..,, • . . ! - \ • .v \ i'lli, , ( 1111 "'IP t . . 9 • k ; ,-"" • 1-! i 1 . ' ! I . \+-'4‘ 4 'r \ \ _____...... 5 c • a 0 , ,,,, , g.. . i , • ; •. 1 ' 1 • . Tr t 0 ck, • \ II \___. )1? ....... it'," 61 ,. # ; , i 1, : i o; • ., w v.; ,,o . E, • , \ \ t tf,;,,--T,6 f ct'' • ; ... - % % . 1111 • \ iPI i 1 • , I ------. og ..1 , I I 1! . ., . . . ‘ ,. ‘.\_. ..••-b % ' • 0' i 0. it'' ! 1 I 51 i \ s 1 . .....A1--- --- ----. re 4 • 0 0 ,, CP 0 40 I I 1 i 1 .. . 0 7....,1.0" /---....... _.... ..--.'---...., ..,..... k OR. • i I • ' i \' \iii .. ----- -ci_ - - 11 rt ••/6 • '' --11.OliCi ° al ! Hi iii-:.„ ....A, i 1 '• i • . ' i qitt ---- . m ..............'. . "---- ' \ \\k % • • i. \ V14' ' ,, i .- n r'lli: . - b.g,',1 ' 1 - I, e.,t . •, I , f flii----vw. . V.',, . 1 - . • 7 .„, -•,.,, 0.. \ 1\ \ / e A . 1 " Ir., ' 0 i .1,,ICIJ-.., li 0 • III 1 , ....,,, i I 1 it 'i).11 \r \ \'• C'' '' • t, e • .0ig • '4.-.40,71.,...:. fr-- - . •' , . . 1 !itr. • --- . is 0 I P. • I • 1 b 1 \ \ 1 ' • TIf' 1 ii .. 11 e` p! • • _., .. 0 • , a. . ., 1 i eawok° t / „...1•1.., OS tr 3 i ; I I 1 01 . * ti E. g I fill 1 11,, o • • . o -: ! i 1 , 1 • . \ \ It I (1,10 g I I,. , i . ili - p e i,,, • . ' J\ 1 1 . •. r n\ \ e.t, • •, 62) _ 0, 0 1 0 (‘, \ 1 .....A ? z -k \ Ili trin - - , , . • , - t \ \ ',1 1 6 • • . 1 , L.yip i• - 6 •. a , . z • ) WiriAkgti i oo i . .41bIle l . ' .,II -0 0-.--....----6--° -.-:. 1.. 1.1 _L.0_1 \ ' ' • i 1 .., . I (004 0 a 'Li? 1 ,c,..\ \ , ---t_._ • s ,.. _-_-"- .--.." • . 1-- ------- ' -4 I " IL . . , -5. ! tIW . \ . : \. ....._, ,„,.. o ?Tr _f__-.7• _ \-.., - '-------nr ;- '''''--• %-1-4-, 4- 3 ' • . 511 \ 1. •<-1-d1( --- _ A . ...---1- . 6 `'t1 0 . . K i A. r ,••0 . II I • , • • . l• • 9 \5ti e _ °_ '01°11/ o 1:3-0-\,7". 1 I ..: -1 3 : . • c °II % ' " - i . woe, • . • • „ ' 4. 6. ED 1 . .. . 0 . M \ I ,C i P. • . , , CD i \ \ 1 • . ' 1 : ,.,. i 1 1---P--i. %Pi 4. 11 . t. . \3 a i-..---° Oi• 1 8 , , , 1, , . • . . I • A 1 i 1:°- . . 1 . 10\. • i . i 1\ -1 1 i. 'le' , LA , 1111 . 1 ; 1 (• 1 , . ; n.,, • ; 1 \ 1 0 1232.16- t• ' . • 0 i ' • 11 --------km c' I i ' 1 gl • I; •I'l •, I 1.1. * 1 , • i: • . . ... : . 1 I ll 1 I • , I.. I n A ...Ism•1 0 1 . • 0> 1 I ) I , 01 • oi, ' ' • 1,...17,0" ., , 1 ti • . ii 1 I a • 1 "I ,1 • , I 1 . • 1 .0 1 • \ id MII . . -It. • . If 11.11in ' I . . I 0' .,, g P- I •I, , 1 . ; •• \ . i li ll Mr. a ! i e/'. . 1 . i \ 0 . . - " I 7,:i-r, '-c! • Re'-d. It ... ' i • .• 0', ',D.,3 ,=.•' ...• - 5 .1 11..,. :6 m . 11 plop illi 1 0_....,,..,, 1 I ill 7--.,..1, . 1 - ' t ..-i '; I; "I . 0 P-----,,, 44::-: -. Flc , ,j,;) ... ••• ; .. J '' • • • . . ,, ,• 1 6 i \ l• : 11111111600-1 11 >>>0 • 0 6. - I iv. • . d 1 \. : 1 1. i mll • • 0 . , lid IT 1111 " r 11111 ° 0 I IR • 0 , . 1 ,..) . • ! .... 1 , la_ • r•cif . I 1.1 hi 11111 I 6.' \I I . I. , ...0 o 1 'II tl 11 ll A v ail t 0 • . • 1 ' ,/ i ism o 1!! W' 7, I •r t 10 ' 10. fi 1 1: 1 ) , -,e.„ , ! I . , • - -1/4,0t....,,,,,. , ..,. , . 0 • . ..: r I ' ' ) . . ,( -.' .o r 6 :it / 00 - I z • ‘ I t I l - .° - . _I. 1 . • , . tn / a r v 1 0 . v "1,17Miss a, _ • ' . . I: Nil I?' " vase:: ' 'I' , /i .. i CD . . 0 : . . 0 OSIT.14' .. . ..6. • • .. ' ' ..I • :I 1 •.r%.:':.... . IN • ' • ' . t.::::1\-`:., .\ 7 ' 5 . ----------------------------- ' ""• - ---- -'------ ----------------- -'- Greg L.AllwIne, MA co , t 'cc .. 1‘•541' • ' ° • 1-1 0 1 t. 41:AR,..W111.' .2.•• CITY LIGHTS APARTMENTS Iviltett NA. o I ;.150.,Y114'- '1 TOR mom RN OCTILOPTITN?CONTRITION cri '!ism dale:c.•5001 ell N.MUM SIMI•OI TACOMA. NA rise DOT SCOJ-9100 r. . Latest rev : r• du . . ::......,..,.. .:.... I Mel Easter, ASIA I s___'_._.:_ 304 main ave.so..suite 200 renlon,wa.98055 (206)271 7200 623 5732 , • . • . • or K.AN U 0 POLICY DEVELOPMENT • "_ 4� `` _ -200 Mill Avenue South `''t "'"� .-: --.-- F"sra�-lj L c '— Renton, Washington 98055 , JUL (�y((�.� w=o - Ij)',� ..d Q•� J LU 03 r , I i; s; '-)kJ' i ilo- A 9.% sEP-C°° .¢ET U�2N O\ L -, j! i,� Y ¢ �,SE(VDE� ,._--; REASON C'3ECtt ell /Onclaimed Retused:d — (�"I Attempted-Not known ( - • - - - - - _ Insufficient Address No srchstreet numbe [ Terry L ET AL Heilman No such office in state 2 716 1st Ave N Do not iemail in this envelope Seattle WA 98109 • I' . j ‘ .y v1 d a',`t� .1.1.11td31l!i.iifl-lrii2Iititiiilit!ili:iIliitti'i!ilcrl .. i . NOTICE OF PENDING SITE PLAN APPROVAL RENTON, WASHINGTON A Site Plan Application has been filed and accepted with the Planning Division of the • Community Development Department. The following briefly describes-the application and the necessary Public Approvals. DESCRIPTION: CITY LIGHTS APARTMENTS • ECF; SA-087-89 ... 1 i - -Applicant seeks site plan-approval for a 70 unit apartment complex to be located on a vacant 3.3 acre R-3, Residential Multi-Family, zoned parcel. (Note: Density level has . been adjusted for greenbelt on-site.) GENERAL LOCATION: East side of Benson Road between Puget Drive and South 26th Street. j ;i PUBLIC APPROVALS: • { o Environmental Review o Site Plan Approval • o Building Permit Approval The application can be reviewed at the Planning Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval. For further information on the application or dates of final action by the City, please contact the Planning•Division at 235-2550. • --- ------- I III - --1 ------_/:-- : — 1 i� j - IItL10 `10N ' 1 s Wr'CO . ' /E ;:::N\. I 1 i. I, /f-I. Terj.--,.wig 11 .--....—.../--;;;—-...-:/:1:1 r- -0 • . ._ " - . • . . • 2.,1„,..........1 ______. .... , . . . , . p.,...., • , • , _ ,fr.'''. PANAMA% ' / 71—'7—'—:::::-.:----:— — s ;: CE r, a N,� PROJECT SITE %/ I 1 I y� iJ-- -ram--, 1.... I,-it. .----..... • 1 s i uL__ 1 ' //ft / / % C - • vIC? sto psi:3,r -- ..:.... o 4))6 „i- .-. ,.../49 17, . . . • ?:.,----:" ot ' 11:9--(Z) • a .l, .f" (151 .:;:- ---- b1.45?"/Q ;;:----1----rb ; /*N.,. . ' „1:14).---la.) - c.P /' 1 c\''A._-V.-?7T' 1 ---\/.N\...11.11.!.:.L„erar N L . ft- ;j . q ; • • • • - ' • • . . , . • • . 1 ) •ii• ' i '',. • ‘ 1 I •.I s . , I t. v., . .5 ----50 VvATEIL fuer Of.Vvftf..____---4 .., 1. k ,....,. i • , . I . i ;• Or N.!.I ! a .I iN.02. , .., / / ! ! \ )\ ,:', \ 1 x I 1 ' 1 ' 1 I 1!:. ' . ., • • . . . i ; ( . i ' . ..1. , ... . ..it 1‘\ • 1. . ---=— _____e_f_ _le .. -•-• % % i • i'", - r• ,....1.:, ,,.. . . , . . •.,, P. , ,.. 0 1 .... , •el.. .--",-* , nit I I 01) 0 • ; ". i • . • 11410 i '\ : 's 0......vi' , • 9.r6 06 1.1 e % (70 lb . / I.,,. 3 ,. • „?.,iz \S t • :::1 1.. 0 0 t \I\ 1 . \ • \ I. . 1,111, ! . _. . ,, I IOW,It e• • ir%\‘`--c‘D,. %0 . ?, i .. : ..i. --,-..,...: • . ,c vy I, I ' • I • • 01 l ot. vv. \ 14.\A • I do Or e t li . .41 0 .1--(' ' 1 1 • 6i 0 ri t e. • VAC® ts 1 0 • P_ • \ 1 ..\ \L I S' ' so- ., to (E\ .0 t •4 ° 0 0 , • I . t F-1 i• o n _; ii /4' % f , • ' ..,,T,. \ 4•11\' \3 ..,,,,".;I_-.V..i:..I.42r1 s coa o. k-t-I. ;0;9^7.7_.--\_(m9.0.g0_, •.tt0.. •1 . 0 \ p 0 o , .s 1 \ : , oJI 00 1 •1, I \ \ - ° I ‘.\).;•1_.rl31,1,o,•;, i,;;• ,•›.,,i,1.... .1...-6I1\• :i •.22.:..A7 ••• 0.,:, I • • I 1 • 0 \ . • \‘ (:. --- -_' -- % ele/. • 1 I . I -.° - • " •--"-- -:44A b :II I! II : • . ---.....* ' .. ; Tin ' . . • 0 .., : 0. . • P.''• ' 0 • •\ 1 • g i f? • v , 4 % '. • . 0 • AI, 1 03 C • II?.il V--‘. - , \ /\ \ '' ‘ tt A I 0 : ., s 0 q; ilg, '' 1 IF • . t—--- ' : • ,® - - - ! . ,....: 1:ro,,,,._.__...7...... 1 fr----lt-OF). $ 0 0 7 i, o •., 0ft . r 1;E \r P t 111 • 1 \ \ C ' .. • 1 -f, e • 111 b k. \ ‘,I i WIN 1 , ------Ai ' lik " -'' ., % L i , •-•,. itk. \ "-• 1 _..-.17;, • - , . ..... . 6 „c,i \ • . Oro, ' II(111 \ i 6 I !. I • • i I q 1 ' 1 H. .. 1 I 1 (tin 6 ; 6.1 . I 0 / co\ \ 4. • In I t4\\ .0 ,.,(11:\ 9 r. ! t 1 0 • t • 6 1 116 4 i e, 0 0 . , 3 0 . • . 0 1 . A i / .. 1.1 I 4).. ... i . Z in I \ g \ 1 1 t ‘ II (VP 0 :, i. ) . 1111111611" Ill. *- - o • 1 i • . 1 ' ' • I • • O 1 • \ •-•""1": I .- -----°---- —••••••.- '•1 oo I ..•••• _____- o i ill 1 .i • • • r.) • ?ll Tr 'AVIV .134".. --- °—---'--I .4" - i 0 •• - -t-- -. • .1.4.1___ -.--V--- -VI„r..+:•- _.—.--.. ----1 7:77---11.1 . t - ' Lt.._1 • c.... . \ \......._ ,„,. (3 ._ ._„. . _. .... 15 las. . 410 •.:, .\ i , 1 , , , ,. .. .\.. .. 5. , . • ,,, \ , \• -- ---- 6 0 0 % , • rn • 0 , . . ; 1 . a 41_1 r • • • i • • 0 [ = 1 co . •- • ims. ., iii ,.. :. • ; . . ' !: a • M \ . \? 1 :Pt k oil 11111•1, • • • 1 i "I 1 rn,I , , • .•• . • f-••-• e . .r- • \ g IL ' / I b. 144,1 El • i i I i • XI. 2 = 1 4> . \ 3'1\ - 1 i • i.- •lel \ i 1 { ( • 1 ! '''. ; . . 61 . • k", t• '''' "' . t.„',,,,,,, I .- . e. 0•i 6:11/1 i OP i CL1 - , ;0 ( .• to M 1 • .., 1 . 1 •,, . ,. . ,,,,,• • t cn 1 • -1 . . 1 1 ----- NI ... ... D . ., • !I 1 NE vi) 11 I 01 • " 6 • - nii. be .,-, ; • „sae_. ..,0 • . ) n . . . , !II1 um, ili.V., 1='1I-C..6•i3••.;.'•,,,,I ,.,. II1 ............_ • • 1.--; \\-11Yft1\11,, ..- - •5.2:.iI1I:;i!III'i, .• a . • . Wi1• --- 1 •MM 0 t 0 1 I•t i•-.•1• I ., • H111"i,1 pIi I1.1''•,,;.1 ll„'(I•1l, ..I .• I,,•lI II 1u I i I t, .. 1. , , „ . • ., - X • i 1 it • ' '') 0 e. o T ---I 0 11 . i. • • . I 19d\ , • 014i, IP . c7 e • . 4• • I 1 P- ,. 2...-.▪ !• iI III Id PHI' . , .1 l' ti 11111 t 0 \I ' , i • , . 0 O / 1 .• . -, , •i ; ' ; i• . E• , 1 ,i . )1 : • -.: 1 ) , . e..,e..• i ti IIP : i . 'o tit. ' ioi i ' (1 w,tkicc. 0 . 1 ' • ' ' a-, 1 • . ; . ,ii 0 I io - :1! i .0 • • . 1 „ , , • ; i . es 1 W Vial•i 4oJ ---- itae" . , . if 13 • I • , ' ' 9°▪ il ' , • li '• . ' ' ' ' .1 ! 1 /..;-•.:':,... . ▪ i . . . a) , ' •i ! .:.:::v•%••_ , = I , • • . . . 2. I . . 1.:*,•1•-i....ii;li.-;::.; = ' . .. . hi Greg L.AllwIne, AIA 1 ..cijI17. to , • o ; PAecktitkikiiii••:11:• • CITY LIGHTS APARTMENTS , P ERM WA. 4 .3.•.„ g i - _.-.)) fi. '..ii'l'a‘',4illoi. ••-, .' 1;*, FOR MATH Nu INNII.M•Ht CCIMA11611 W • i,...t.-.try 4.,,tect '1110 dale,C.,5011 633 M.MIMIC Milt*S. TAMA. Ink MOO NOM 5115-9.00 ...i.i•-...,-3. w Latest rev I. ..,db .. ...,...., ,.. ,,. ,.. 1 Mel Easter, MIA 1 I rn ' •;• 2 .:__.. 2:4 304 main ave.so.,suite 200 renton,wa.98055 (206)271-7200 623-5732 • . . ' . ...• •:. ; l''' t• ' • .. : •', . . • • . , , . . . .• or R b A . . • 0 POLICY DEVELOPMENT .---:-.7., ``L'1:-14,04,\ c. 200 Mill Avenue South ,,,, 7 ,,,-, -!:- ... .7„...-„,—„,.—• n .,r 11,V -i { — '?"' Renton, Washington 98055 JUL 20'8g ------- 've u i-I A • ,,,-,;----r'zc I—- i.. ..• ik) ,i' sErce-1* :i Cf, ---.7)‘,, ) E-,-.... i ( 'r-m E T E V' '' " * r900 166.".' * • Multivest Ltd 11056 Main St #110 Bellevue WA 98004 • ---.. .ce:,;,.„,:-5,-/4:9--,..„ < C261 ;N . - -,UM B 7.',1 '--;"--IL i 1 Ez ipr ' ,,,,-: • ••,: J. ....—.... - - .. ' - .11111ihtitil.millitdirhilitilitishilhuhilll . . .. .- . NOTICE OF'PENDING SITE PLAN APPROVAL RENTON, WASHINGTON A Site Plan Application has been filed and accepted with the Planning Division of the Community Development Department. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. DESCRIPTION: CITY LIGHTS APARTMENTS ECF; SA-087-89 Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 70 unit apartment complex to be located on a vacant 3.3 acre R-3, Residential Multi-Family, zoned parcel. (Note: Density level has been adjusted for greenbelt on-site.) • GENERAL LOCATION: • East side of Benson Road between Puget Drive and South 26th Street. PUBLIC APPROVALS: o Environmental Review o Site Plan Approval o Building Permit Approval The application can be reviewed at the Planning Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval. For further information on the application or dates of final action by the City, please contact the Planning Division at 235-2550. 1 -- �-- E1t HILU ii)4\ . •7 : • , „ :;„,__, _ ,07.....•-• I . s .... ..'. . b. II. Pi_____ .! rt. :- .1fte&zi ' • -11"'" " ‘ 1` t ,/ PROJECT SITE I ji p I;s l•`' : a ;; / / 1 ;'P.11 -MN CROUCH LI j i L- ' ; 1 ''It' i "L 77 .1 ,1 1 _ -� -D. .�� SK10MAHS�I�ACTYIR�S `;;�.'' .a b,b?- l to •�`�V"\'�J-'�.to 7` n.Pr4 '....-c-rcriii3 ..* '-.047, ,i'61`.-1-9,,cij-‘49 Ps • ...y ,r-n. .,..„----" ty.,,,," .4);, ,;),,, ,____, .„.).....4 ..„-- c_rtr,,..../.1 •:-----1. Pi :71 1.--1...... � j �.-T S.LIE.AS L,IL.00rnsi.stIto ex 1:17.")P.C3 --Z)19,... . --.., , ,, . • ... , . • ' . . - . ,• ' . "'"•'" . .. .. . . . .—..... . • ''• • 1 iu . I I './.; .' : I. 1 k!-----------5d vvmem ruesizor•Vvr,f-- - -':.... .., 1.. ‘:,.,. •••• , , • ( i•• ;•11*Or II ) -.../ I 10r. • • . / . I • . . I...' .-.-. F_ • / • . • •.,, rs. I .:. - 0• ° • 0 ,. ----1,1 *'' , 1 l• - . 0 . . . •.. ' ‘*--77'N': ' .• MI \ . V ° t ‘1,q•e °o% e % • . •• • • ‘• 1 • • \i11-14\ . , .• 1 ; I• 1, ,,, --' 1 6.4. .0 ' z T\ e"---.4,..Vo •-• ' • .!. . A ot \--'11 o I l . 1 • \ I ii .1, I 1 ' 04-1 .A f % ..,, .4 ‘ ., .0.-_--1 0 1.._,2. : \ 1.. i ) 1 • .,• • \ i ., , 0 • \ _.,i• ; • • p (P).-1. • -; : _ , . '• It ,,.11 i.1. .• - 0 n • tt, • '‘-A • ' f . % 1 .• • e ro* .•• k . ... \ • ,.. \ J:10 i 1 rev -1-1. .)..• ;'''' '., • ; -.---- '2 .• - ! . •• I.!' ; b • • ". \4•-•;or'' is, \ ' ---..r," 8 o . co° I, 0 r . , • , \ ,,,,,. ,,_,,, ..„,,, t ..., ,„ , .4.... . ? o, 6, . . .14 (. . I , II I : col 0 : I . . 1 Ca I • 1 . i i dn \ -. ;. eik---\ . Ilk ,,,) ' To 1611 1 : i 11.--••:;*-- Olg .014 5 I ' •' V '‘‘ ..i.._7\!-\----,- -___ e •• .. % • • 8 ; • o 1 1 o q • • .? di r) 4 t I ; • • il I pp . 1 . :,............ .1.1010 b •• 1 , , , •• N. :: .. ..:s .• %. --.ricliF:.1. . • Ai ........ . 11 COI° \ ... % % . ( t, ' • \ ----- m?, --_ \I" ,g) • -III . '131 . . 12g A 0, \ y-- ,f. . , n I: I', kg 1 . ••111., .. , , . • ".... I . % • . 1 . o 0 • 1 ., • 1,., o. . • 2 bit , . z —L, z .,•` 11 • In o 1 IS t ' ;P• 0-•••• ! 1 . 0% , . , t, e • VW :-• ' . 0 \ \ 1,, i .;.. !RI! - • --. U. • .• •-• • . I',i•\i. _......\i . 7N'I-T.p rPinl•ai0 rr1i 1•1g i• -----i1ni-%e•' . S 7, . . (4 \ -- -- t\ - 0•% h\ 1) . °11 II\1' •:I' I I./ \ • - r,i. \ , ;' : i \ 1 \ , i •6,_ aIP. • - • 0 •••••• II . ; i(k, . • 00 I . , • 33 .'"\-• ''-.:.C-)=--_: -- --_ ..• i I 0 • 110 \ ??? .?.L ,- . .1/0__. _._....._ 0 ° .._ 1 .Iv 1 . 0 .. _t _ 4,4L.__ 24,1___. _. 0%. • . • , 1 ,..- .• • „ . ._ _,. _ _ ,____....._ a I . 111110 . . c. • .4 .--• 1 _......, .:. I. I.1 '' 1". 6., • • u:I"\ . l'' ,,4•Ef ' I , . • ! - . . • ' 9 k • 9_ - 1 ""11 ' F . i- 1-1 1:140 In• .1 . ; ' t: :. i• . S4 .-1 I cl 11 •-• i • • '' egg; i f • .. 16- • , •. .••.• ... •1,i ••: .5;4i 11 • • , .‘,, 1 i;1 . ts .1•4._t,.,.__\,e4I, •0• 0• i 1!p.iIlL ll= m;'la'a-i iI•uO'a I •g, i i, — PI (0(•: •••ii •1' •") !• iI; . .I1 11 rri \ 1 i I _._ . - ---; ., • it , !lit • 1 0 - 6 • varlets ,• • i ..., 1 I • Ill I Et 2 ' i ' .1 I.\ l'il i.r• • • I 1 .1 I 1 . .. , . . I . r: \. 11,, It II • trin a I 1% i , i 11 . =cr.- ' • Al.&f- --- 1 . • , ••••••••••••._,_..vrf-____ G") • 1 II • - ^1.• . • '1' ' 1 • -- . I I ' • I I N.,..), . 1 .•. 4 1 1 • -4 - •• 0 1 •I: 1 . ; ! I • . I ' 6111 • .! '; 11 . ' • 1 g ; t . I ff f: .4 • . •,:-.1:::!. z i i 1 I__Jo g - o ' . . . _ . 1 g • 1 \ If Tr a -i. r, • 1 • •• 1 1 • .. ;,* e I Nil F •••• `I. 11 . . , ', ' 31; '. 0 ; 1 111 1 Oil I /3. i II ..‘ 0 , , 1 1 in II 11 I . ,.... ._...4_,_ ,,..... tkci r i - II P'°: I ..is, t !. • 17j)( ii? ilil:ii-1 . 1 . . - ,, i ; 4 . 1 . . J.- . I,. ° • i :\ IIIIII . : ! I• • I .1 i 4 I i I .• 1,t .1 , • 8 o • • I . 0r ii ..... , ..L.I I i i . • r••••""ininTINI•larrriti • . . . 4 _ 1111g 11,111•W " __414/116.13 " • , . I . ., , . • • 0 timr.• •..... .. .. •,,;__4 j . ,, . • . . . . . . (f.•,;:?.:v;4\1 I . .. . . . . • . .. _ . I Greg L.AllwIne. MA Pfirrx.ct tteiAtir.•!. " • CITY LIGHTS APAMMENTS . ' /WM Ile. 1 1-14 C. :liflii6i.i;k. ..• .'<'... ‘••:••_;___Me •.):•.:.:.Y-N•W..1'• nit 141111 PIT 00.0.1..01T COrTMIC.1 1...t..:.'j;=n1t0 .Issue dale:ce 004=1 MN.MUM. PIM.S• . /MM. VA WPM 11041 981-9•00 tales(ley I , Alla, •••ij:.•,?.7.,V.gri . . NOV 304 main ave so,suite 200 rental wa 98055 12061271 7200 6235732 I MelEaster' ASIA I • _. . . I• . •••• i. ' 0 l• • .. . :•'• . • • . •i; .. ,.. '... • • • . . `y o POLICY DEVELOPMENT _ - _ - tit j- s 200 Mill Avenue South j' r �` f,=_ U s P4sra ��_� . Renton, Washington 98055 ` .-.``.•x i 5 'IJ:y A t v� k 4. � SEPtE GOS 25 ! i, * _ 24063891 09/06/89 ?..€' `1 hAT E R'' : r • sw 1 �9^O1F&11 i • R GOSS RETURN TO SENDER MOVED LEFT NO ADDRESS . Verneva Goss 1425 S Puget Dr #D-2 Renton WA 98055 4 I1,1„1;,1,11,=„I,1::1,1',I„1,!11„„I 1,1,1,11,,,1 NOTICE OF PENDING SITE PLAN APPROVAL RENTON, WASHINGTON A Site Plan Application has been filed and accepted with the Planning Division of the 1 Community Development Department. The following briefly describes the application !I and the necessary Public Approvals. i DESCRIPTION: CITY LIGHTS APARTMENTS ECF; SA-087-89 ... II Applicant seeks site-plan approval for.a 70 unit apartment complex to be located on a ' vacant 3.3 acre R-3, Residential Multi-Family, zoned parcel. (Note: Density level has • been adjusted for greenbelt on-site.) GENERAL LOCATION: East side of Benson Road between Puget Drive and South.26th Street. PUBLIC APPROVALS: o Environmental Review o Site Plan Approval o Building Permit Approval 1 The application can be reviewed at the Planning Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval. For further information on the application or dates of final action by the City, please contact the Planning Division at 235-2550. _: \ 1 1 Nll✓NI.OLIN 11 _• : ��• �� N/LIOYJL.MION I 1 i lt.M.CNOQ� _ i \ 1 1 �L� \ I 1 �\ .CMOO� 1 ill . —---;2:--:i r-- ,s, ,,, . . ".7-- : ''- .-- . - 7 I ' 11 ' ' ' --"X7:1]..1. \.(1--.±-.-il \_ : III 11 ,. .- 1... ..1_____.. . r-_-_,.1i3. . . - . , ,•_________ 1 . -7-71-- - s i � ' / PROJECT SITE I l -'-- - -- • o s_ o I', Ii a �`I 1•p....TT.NNIN CNYNCN .;. \ 7/// . ti rt...,...A„. ""T 11741 , i 1_ , .�- • YCLTf1ryANTM!'T/ do yea `` I r<< , .r�,� t�.. / : (.13 .&,rx: ... , - 2.609 .2.._ ,,,,..„, ...,.,„ t . , .23.4--.5.0-ragl \-6.-4_147,..4( Qb,," .4.). Z N .(.; PP-'0 .- ''''iz---> -.I 0-k. ..-/- 1,-,U 6" 01, 1 ' /. - ! /". r\'' - ' : • \.11110111Lialy01/L11waimmumila , ......, r., 4:,() -t- i, I . . , . . . ' . . i , • • . • • i ••ea..••••••no.. • •. 1. . . I ..,.._. . .. ..-.— ._... ... . • 1 . - , . . , , 4.'• . .% 1 1 ..// ki -VO' W.KTVAT RP:TOP.Viler____-----4 . t l ' • t, , , .. . ' 1c :‘ \ I /i • ( : i i•w ;Or 114• .SI.?.Or .•, / . ". .,••-• . - . ' .. . .•• N ( 1 :• t e , I F- ' • ' , .; .. . . . •.. \ . . -.: -.. , ii • '. . : el- •, . • 7-"V---. r • • . ., . . ,.... _;.:, A., . . • .. . • ,, 0 . T. 0 . ....\ , s -(\ , 1111 I o'-, c. illia i ° •, • ot. t % @ a • - N • N • -. )01> . \ , 0_,‘, ,,, l• • . . • ilAp _ sot. 6-- ' ....c.A', • • • , ; • , • . ' 1. -p. -. — --- • VP'et i., ,,° . (-31i1A-.0.‘o . 1--- ,, •,.. • . , . i . I, ot) %,,e 'il t' % . A', I 1 ' • ..-I\ 1 ) • .0 -. . .. . t iv() . 1 o' . \ • • 0., • . il . ,, , S.' % • --VA- . 7 • e . . • . . . I• . 1. . . , ; • . . \ ' " \• ti,• . il; ik-= (1QP, - -- A '•'t .0.-, - - : _ •:,:;.:.•-,__, '0' !...\ . :,; _ : , .. \ - • i..,. . w. • ,: • , • , - -: ''. ";- _, • '•,--•:-t !-•1•'••. •--,•• ••• • , . (. . b . ; V\ ' i-----,...., 5. . „,. 2. . I • ' I . . .. 0. 1 • ?PI> IIT t •-• v, a' • 0 00 l• 0 , 1 1,, poi, — . • ' ea • ; I g: : Co: I .. .• .. . . • C 1 0"fly \ ,. • (I: I 'E• \ 6r1q r. 13- ---* \,.\ .. .ti^. \ \'‘‘i 16 -b I--- -- --_ ipor• . \ \---- 0 fis, a • ,0,,, • I 43-C ' ''• . \ \ ,.i. - \ \ \ \r f. % \ . —.--.. '.- ----— -1) ,., : ----- -...._. le n n ,) 0 ,•,,,, -. 1,It ,) 11 --z7--1 alg 0 4 • V) 0 0 i I I .1 i 1 Z • ' 1 1 ; ' l ''' 1 ; .• / . 00 ii • 0 4 ! • 4 I • i - •--. z , .-1 . 11" .40.11 :1\-iyHp. •-1,1 ! . . 1 ' I 1-1 t is in n. 0, , 4 ,...:. ' • • 1 , t b2fc ill\ ' \E \ . ' . . cl . 0 • 1 -.t e . - • \ ,, I . ; irr . . .E.:: .. .. ,• ki,-..v:".. - - ' • . • .......• ,._ , .0. . . . . • • b . ,,, „ • 1 , fr ... ; • , • \ \ ,i. 0 414, - 1 ---0 , , , L; . •, • 6_ 50'..11 04.. .t , 1111111r4).\ . • • • .4... . • .00. 414- 0 . , . 0 . I i it• 11 3 i , .. 1 \ i I \ 1 1 . , I 11 a (irr ' g I is; • , , -, 12 , 1.1 \la 0 \ \ 1, e, I el : - e, o 0 ,11, •`'.. 0 `\ • \ - . s'. • - ' I% - Id 1 S • . • u, • 1 i , \ 1 min . i i. • 1 : 0 i 11 , : [ 1. ..a. . • 1 \ \ '.\ •• I. V „ , ellealg". •' 00 ' 0 ' I 1 : ... 1 4) • • . . \ -••••:-.\-- ---..-.---'.6:-.- :-._......_ \ _cv . 0 ° .761 I I,t 0 .. 0,,,,... , C....'. in\ 41110 • Jou, \ . \.-7- '. ao ---- -L;. . - - - --1:71111 ' ' 13—-ii a ; -1,1- 4- 7 ( —___—._. 1 I . c .I ... .1\.. .' 3 • 01 1 c • ----- -- -------— 6 ,t 001 • • . •, 0 'I' ,''• (i) !• 0 . 0 \ \ ...--1! ! . . ; li Gi IIKP • , • s • ''l 0 (I) _i L 9 \{)ti D - °- °I. i! • . , \ s • • , k= CU .' - o A •° 1.41-,'• s•et , , . 4... 01 ... , . . .. • ..^ ., . . ' \ \ '• . 1 44 • c 44,. . :lio '00 0; L • 1 • ,. . ' " 1 . 1 • ' ' 1 : . n;'• 1 i iff— --- :UP f, •' [I . C • VP. : • ; s •\ • . - ;le' ® .• j •( • , . 3 , . • 1 A • ' ts . Li . . , a 1 i • ; • •• a z ' • .3y 1 \ - . . 0 •., I T. e,.. .,i : er i op 11 ; ., ; : 0.. • . : VA • • 1. 6. . i . ill I gy . 0.1( .• I 1 . ' 1 CD • . ., , I , : 1 !• U) i ..5... ' . le 1 1 0? _ I ' • ..,....e I,,.!• ., 0! '• ,. "6" ., ... • i.I mi, 11111 1 1 1 , . 0. 111 WAN i I ! • ! 1• 3 . . - -i-12 d ct 2 ; " 1 !f i r: • " . 1 • • i • • --- -. . \ \ a 1 \ i •1-iilli fli. ! ,'"I• . • 1 • ••-.11 k I • 1. 11 ' ! .\ '; • 1 C V. Twin 0 i . : • ® I : , 1 • i ... ,..L..' ' ' 0 . . .. • , e ;, •it ---'' o...11 , I..-• p • i a 1 It i 0 , t t •6 . 15.CP • ...., 10A,.• • i \ i 1 . C _0. .. . _ i A V ; i 1 'w••! v.. Is,,..••••••••..,... II I. [7 : . ! II :.I sau.i. . • -. . ., .rn 2)1 . I, • -.1 • ^- •..4 i':-..'- • • I • -0-..,....: 1:. .` i • •;),_;...i..1 ' ', • • • : 1 1 . . .'i --"''. ••—• --rilMilo Ii6-. •,; .1.:! • v 1 •• - z a I 1 o- .., ,° ., , 1 1. : i,1 1, • It.t-_,...., . • . , , . 1.2. ;. 9,\ , 01, iv•r ..11111: : ,s.-7.5•1 o 1 li ... 1 .' i • i 13- • ";» i 11 -III 'Vliii • Cr „17\I 1 • i 6. ..• c, G a 1 •) . I ' ; 1. V; 1 ill 11%1 •• : • •1:. ,1 ' eA. r c ': P' e I .'01 io ' i • Pi) 11 ..t1 *e"...„ °i • I ' I ' I : • Ark-t-- ,r,r 0 o • • i.i o':\••1,. 1111 ' I .i) • 1 :II-' . t % • i ITC ! 0 /0 .:1 I i °° * --... • ca.D I ' I , a niggle 0 . cn . I A . . .. / ° • . ..r.., *•i° i ill. ...., 0 t V • ! O 1 . - . ,P1'110 lr•Pr yr - -g •, .• : - --.110....! -• : 0 espAr ... . . • o : .. , . • - • • - - - • " • . . , ... . 3 .1 , . • • - • • • . ,.--:?...-:::•,ir,:,;:,J ., .5. , • . to ,1 • .4. . 0. ;..... ...1:., . 13.tpeCktto..14;4k-f ,- . . ' Greg L..AllwIne, AIA 8 ,. L-Lcij ,, flip:A --... .,„,...) CITY LIGHTS APARTMENTS FENTON, WA. ' . Ta11i31(k. ,1,, FOR mow NAY IXKLINVENT C0r01.11001 -••,,•• • ' . fk...1.....N n•.cenet0 0 1 , Issue date:c.•&ye/ I30 M.MIMED. sum••• ;Pi- :1 • lalest rev . ...(lb MM. AA "4" 0061 5••••••• -1..Z.- VI'r•r•T- 7 , to i • I 304 main ave.so.suite 200 renton.wa.98055 12061271 7200 623 5732 Mel Easter AStAl \ 1 , . 1• • • • : • OF RA, 4 il,� itiR o POLICY DEVELOPMENT _--:--�_ : -- _ 200 Mill Avenue South �' ____ <'` y -, ;_ 0 ral. ,. Renton, Washington 98055 '� " �l�V grFo sEPT EMOHUT 2 �l/ I�_FJ%{ 7� Y DETER * * �1 30018EQ * ' * RETURN TO SENDER NC) l-ORWAi•tii.)1.NG Okl.)1::.1•,: ON FILE UNABLE TO FORWARD WAR D i R J & Hutc ins M S Gardner 1425 S Pug t Dr #D-5 Renton WA 8055 450 16.61\9•13b Nc'' V U ENABLE <:::- - �o li 1 - Ci OWDRESSED �' Q G2Et s 'UN ARLE iG FCRWARO 8Z lilt' 7'' F:E?UPN TO SENDER - '�.N)"ib��� !: : I: ;,, : : : C i .I . 1 • is ! NOTICE OF PENDING SITE PLAN APPROVAL RENTON, WASHINGTON • i II A Site Plan Application has been filed and accepted with the Planning Division of the ' Community Development Department. The following briefly describes the application ' and the necessary Public Approvals. II DESCRIPTION: CITY LIGHTS APARTMENTS ' ;, ECF; SA-087-89 ... 1 Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 70 unit apartment complex to be located, on a il vacant 3.3 acre R-3, Residential Multi-Family, zoned parcel. (Note: Density level has • been adjusted for greenbelt on-site.) GENERAL LOCATION: a East side of Benson Road between Puget Drive and South 26th Street. • . • PUBLIC APPROVALS: -- o Environmental Review o Site Plan Approval o Building Permit Approval . i The application'can be reviewed at the Planning Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to Public Hearings, during Public Hearings; or prior to an administrative site plan approval. For further information on ithe application or dates of final action by the City, please contact the Planning'Division at 235��,2550. . i ---- --_,---- _--' I --- •�, ` I •I - 1 1l,, . '1 `•'��� CsummiON I S ammo eHOoL N,ol : .: ! - ____,„„, i- .„,s,„ ,, . • ,, ...,,,, , , , ... ... . .. /1,.... 1 1. f s)::::::31 \ • ' .' ' . ' - • 9'' I • ;w,R,w,ez . .. i.I riN o 1. G• /////// // =_ W i u i' !, r' t3. -1 __ n �o L. ' Jo ;;• PROJECT sITEI• • i , /• � , ii 7 1 i ---1-�+,Ir a ../ /// .�. ___� O et-, ...., ,,., ..Q.. •I! r ♦� r�/� \ IW • ov • II . •- II . . III . • I I . ! . . : ! . , . _ . • • , •' , . , . ' . • i ' • • . • 1 . . . .. i..: . . J ' 1 . . ' • i; - • 1 .. ' • t. k."-------sd wfra-eA, mrediror•Vwer----4•••, '• 1.. `,.... •••• . . . i I .sum.• I\ .1 A \ i i .; i :, , 1 N /es Sr V ) .. . . 1 .:-.- ILA NfIlli t : I ' i i # • / ,. TV------ - • . , e "__ __ \ *I•''.• 11 i i 1. . ' : - 0 '1 .----°. at , a . . .. 11/..... ../....:,..;:ip r '. . ..„. , : , , . • ,• • e• /\.• o • . • • .•\ , St,___.---7-% \ 1 ' ' Int (D%), 0 v\o„ ; • ' ' . • (4 0 °I°% 0 • 4 \ ' Vi.A .\I dia. i>1) . cr;5_,..\' :,( • le t . • • 0• • •. !j \44.1 ;\ .' 1 115 ,),•'41411 . 4, c 1 t______t • \ I.' • ( . • I • la ‘ t 0° , O. i . . • . •-• , 114. .1 • CIO Cri° e t, i . ., • P. • i . 1 5 _ • . .. \ .., i • 3• 1 -- cv•-k--,, , 1 9 b. '' I° '' ' \ ' v 1 -;---i- ! ,)..: ,...• ',... , . .• \\4; 1 11' ---6 8 , 0 0 1 „,- I I!, ' Ii • : I 41. I \ \ \ Tli PPP zo a le . 0,,ct, ‘ : • . 1 . . . % \ , ‘4,...0. _ • 6, :: P 1 .. , Z.! • , 1 ; • . . % 61! Hi : 1 E • • g i du \ : 6- • lig ---.'. (lig .0 V. I I ! 1 . ..•\ - 6 % L F. cl \ .,.., ! .,. A ..-•-b . t o 5L ,1 . ........;,-y- - ---- 000, .0 ,- 9, . , ;sr 1 . . 0 i • 1 I . • ° • I 1 • 0 . \, •\'' 4 7._.=•\-°\-- ,-• -._____ , I I • • • I . . I tl f, ''.- ---- I 010. • I • \ . , 0 • % , --- --o •-. ----....., 4....ir, b I ! i "to ' . • ' . - l• , . , 1 „ , a 9I • •.• 16, • (•,...i .\ ----- gis - , g iirl \ r,,/,.• ' 0 it . I ft?---1-141. • 111.''• ., •\ I I\ ' Z P• • .,„ c., 0 V.It • ( ' IP 1 zt,•'10 1 . I • . ; .01Cr ' Lt.IIIIIP-}„,,...‘, 'fr• ' . % . 1 t \ \ , 11 b 1 I\ 1 I gi V,r., it—II ' ii, cy —„ .1 t ! . 1, ••••••• . _ i.) • r ., 0 • . , '•, 6. . ; 1 \-• ,, 4,...•••• i / Idel.. ; • 1_ 1 •• it..P•cA, 1 1011101111,\ •a r 6 a \ ' • ' ' '0, t 1 ol . • , 0 I ( ; "11 •, • 1 ! i 1'4 ti(10 g . , • I ! , • • % 1 . o . _ 1 , . ii, • 0 : . - 1 \ P. I 1 1 14 . 1.1D 1 0°: '3 \ ' \ \ • ... ,..., I 8 1 I' . ( . • 4 a J . In • ' " ; e• o 1 . \ ) 1 . 1• 1, .i D . Z I • ur i \ I I, s wir, 0 :, • . „,. 1 1 . . , ..p , I A t . . ' • Z \ v , „ 011.101.11. 1 • *. a , I . :, 4,• . oo I • 41•••• 1 • 337.11 1 ......, 1- .-.-71 0 ._. ____ . .._ 0 • •4 i 1 ' p__ o____ i •! ..10.1.. 0:\ \ , : • -tr2_---,. .7.. +4,1-- --11:__. • _____ __—..-_ 6 ; I . . • . :\j. ,.ii! .____ . .• _\- --1-----_,N ,.,, ...,:„._,.. . 0 111110 • '? I \i ? .._._.,i , , , i . .. ......._____ , 01. . ya. .1 uoppi,' isei' ;I/.•i I. .„ , • , , ;. : .... 3 . . 73 ' ' ri:S -Tc ---- --------- to o 1 I tn. . e o_ •••••jp it 0 CD o 3 " •-I i \ •‘ 1 \ cl. 1 .,„ _ - 0 6... • • ., k. ' • • , ' 0 Cti ' ' M 1 ,t\ . .0 "'I M. . • •-• i I 1 , 1\ . • , 1 : -: .. 11 • • C i-..7. 1 i . . • I i' \' 31. 1 . I I\ .. • i- •.'1° - ...ct • . . i , ., - a 1 1 1 • I' • • CL . 1 • ., t„. t. , ts ts ' - 1 ° . i. :• 5 1 1 \ 1 :V 1 • 6 f e 0- 1 : .. . .01, .• 11 . . CL • . 1 1 i sl. - .t ° i III 1 I . 1 .1, • . , • • 6 0 I . ',,.. I 1.!,• ., 'I . . w . . .., , ot ! „31 - ei " • ostrio" , I • 0 1.o • NZ 1 ; ' ' I r 1 i , . . c(ril . ' li ' ' ')°. • I . i ..,...--.1, --- , • Hi il \. 1. i; r. : ' i . 1 . . a tr i . ii11 . 1 . . ; . 1 0,. , • , . .. 1 RI ""D e II: I• • ® i 1 • \ ! ; 1 .. , 1 13 : . . " • : li A ' . " . 1: ,i .-7,7,,,, ..of • el•ct t ' . 0 ii Haim i' 1 • r T ,,„, .. , t , : •- : ,.i . 1 • . , ,-.3 . • 1 -..),f: I .. . ... • 4,4,.. = •• Il I I Gi., 11 . '! ' . • 1:.11 trP• .- • i ; k:1 Ili • - f.- - o • , 1 •..• • ,.•• •0 • - ; 't • • (n • 20 '''' i Iv ., '- `. ----1 C3' '. f.: .. ! Ilk\10.1 ,';'•. . . • . . u l• ,i _, - I., • 30, ' in, . •. o 4 \ ) •Iii in > 414:ii 111411161.1111 . I -:j° i 0 ' :: • • i ' ' ' • 1,.' ' -.?......:r - z • 1 i 1 \ ' I I 1 . r •••• , i . • ..., * I P- . i . 1• . : r all il ' ma 0 6• ) •) I .P 111 I. °• 2!-. i 11 11 111.1 nu , . I g 1 la 1 , .‘ . . . , , IF° ,‘ • . • I, 1 . ic, •a :. ., I li ' I i :,. io. . ) ; ,,,, . , . N ;1 , .. , ., .\, , , ,i• , ,.... ar , , . . .• • 0 ,„,_ .. 11411 • a : : - / a e • ..4443"rr., •••71/ . \ -- . • I ,N IPS Warr' - ---treas. '• - .'i .. . • i ..• • 71----- 0-Wars' • f. ,. .• • - ' . st . 9° .: • i ' (jff...',..7-.71•1:•.....) • 7 ' • • ‘ _ , - - Greg L.AllwIne, AIA WI,/ •.. -,- .° . LU •r•frtq 14:1114:41k-1 I CITY LIGHTS APARTMENTS FENTOK WA 0 c ik 0 • 41U.441.•• ,• .1(44 4) 7 '4 uray.0,14 Ati8 , FOR KWH PAY OVITI.06047 11:0666TIOPS 2 1 . .14sue dale:cr.ecrei ! 1333,N.111116. 61. 91III 464 Latest rev , r allak • TACA. WA WWI Do)941160 441.1.•..4t1;•;:per- c4 = 1 • S Mel Easter, ASLA . • __/1 111Fg. '304 main ave.so.,suite 200 tenton,via.98055 I2061271-7200 623-5732 _s I ..",+ . • . •. ;• . • • • •i• ' ': •• ' " •-----• t \• 1 .. •-. • . - I ! \ . QIv •s xo Pe..ax . t ,.tttY� EXISTING CHAINLINK FENCES • Q'1"V 7m a e `_T PROPERTY LINE. zNa zg S WATERLINE EASEMENT- „Id SANITARY SEWER qua 3E 2 9ETP AC IOI STORM DRAINAGE \I EASEMENT 1 K 4�Q N3¢�• '6 EASEMP.NT, - - _ _ __ 5e�p• S 1 45'25'E I 797.87' / 39.E .. �-. . .. _ B�B 8� - —. ` S 2 24'83'E ` 333.57' / -T Q 15 0 l 4 0 -T_ _ �__ I 0- -E X ITING°O VEGETA TIO N-_ O�FAEM�N (TP) Q 'b= II _-e_q I t • o oy • ° 6 n Gn SGREENI' T'l2 SETsACK- - 00 00 FEI-+ E, ° ' _ i y G o • ( G HIGH SCREEN /EXISTINI 0 ® 0 0 O I O O °O v • FENCE. V LE'A IJN TO O , ..../ O O mO` O O a a,L2 ItSMAIN (TYP) i Si d __-1O • L L ' • O et. � 1 m o° o %` —°— t r�� q, � G L c c o c c c — 5 — — O. 0 — o O: I N p\ 0 O --- QJ l O O -- O J • 2• I O� o �j �' .�\ �0-rod O • O Z • O O �— • ;;�� .k� -T2iE�F-I [� '' • •/" O,i Y s — 0 — OUMPST-R S. 8 C-ARDOR (TYP)- O • I S g ., 4 Q V i-O} -S-O•-,IOEV./ALh° • ° °- \ •0 O ON -�Y A c \\ <J \ o gore_, _ r— L3� o _ ------- --•----c j I 7 \ O O • •O 4 • �rrrVyJ J 4A=H �a1 �• _ 00 - i o o GAef.a, rnr'�fEli�l_' o c rt.. ----- ... � A_t A \ o' I.O..=�LEVI L •a •�1♦•��f� 0A-t A-I 120._(001 6''-f • • d • e,®• - P AO..eT6P\4L 9 .1 ••� '•O • A-I t, L HJOv i y / •I A-1 f. li • Z ci zP��—s(�P� � `�' 1 7 " ' o � i A-1 -sob`, A-1 cn • c c ..�-o • , �� J J S a-N,A EE ° • . A-2 G 2 Z \ \ o G n-2o ° A 2 n <s W r 2 -Y i3.° o ° V >^O •� _ I RECREATION— 1111 A-2 OI C: • C AT- 2 ` um ° Q r - } o __� A-7 '?p CENTER) A-2 ( \ :II _ Li C �i�� �� ��•�' A__t„Iti 0 �..r _I A-2 01 O ■ 1MI 3 p L it I c Iiii tfft 1. 1 A-2 O _ (' a -' -GOVEKEO PLAY O;h` O\ 111 N J x • litt 111 Z. • A.2 • ' O - .=�'—l_538�a— T- ^ 1EI..,R;ATIJN — I.- = > _,Y= En.SE��=N- _ LIGHT STANDARD • E r / r (SR 515) lr gENSON ROAD11110 • WI 0 • z�2'. / �' SITE PLAN f• ep �.. m o a LIGHT STANDARD: POLE MOUNTED INCANDESCENT FI%TURF. 1 •rHen - CARPORT LIGHT FI%TUNE: SINGLE;UBE FLOURESCENT FIXTURE MOUNTED TO } - CEILING. - LI. WALL MOUNT FIXTURE: INCANDESCENT WALL MOUNTED FIXTURE.STYLE • '- - - -' SELECTED BY OWNER, • • II���^��JJJJ`/// ,- n K1 IaT Ji�P 6wmcrrr' ,' P. JohnsonBraund design 'group, inc. architecture. landscape & planning consultants =sun,5EUI CD PM aRcurrEccT ILL 13-7-89 • SCALE:1'=20' 1' '. -I Q S 1 45'26'E •L+ I 6py • iB7.87' f�c.{Z �9l{$ S 2 24'63.E 333.57' g •6�90 E ,Y- —— - • • • • y, __ _____ ________ _ _far ____ ________ __.,_ ___, _ __,,_ 113E.E-10-5E: _ _:__ _ I i g ..,4 a • ,sot . g •�••. 1 �.• ••• � �s�yf•?gT•••a•� _�lc�sss 70fff:ffrl��fff: �f • • • 1 r�P n� flr� ; �rwr•mrre�la•c =a r f ��ece • a i LMy � - �� • ` r p, ro. o qo ° • • m• H 36jfl� ! frr \ ,• \ � li ' 1i11li"llAt .0-4. -1M1;iaz-ziai=-C1=0 e \ 1 - 7.EY . , - -, -- 1 % -r\-- t 1\0 t‘t.o\4.18- !-""1,..1.7.-9. I . O ' :II )! . 4, l i / . z .-V Ir.ANiTVP.ti:i7lk. • � V ate, . rligile . Ong Aagow ) 00.4,,,..404,,,,,,.. fa il A.....,4 „ii.,....,,,A..- .04...gro • * "-- smill _MIINIPPla - 1 ,WoratHir . cc--- 14 ill‘li r' -P ' \ • e i m : i *14. Silt o LI c ,.().A .....4,„„r------- pArie.,..•V•pirgalp, \ , ag-NR, e4� \ co 2 °�� �, .' ELEV=35T 2.BI'. `.r o I/'1 •�O \ O �—. I z 0 ON' °.. \I�- ctNtFA � I• I,F. 51'.0 .Z -- W w n a �� / —��1, �- I j'.a■� -- -- Aso !�0,.;-+--m 8 N , F..'.4.., 3 \.1.4 '" • ViNal •__.----------------.- (-±-,TE — c______„,,,, _ ., c., 12 ct ' 1/� Q�10�••a1/32� ...� i !— -_SAD lSR 51 \ \\ '\\ ::: :° I . , ' Y LIRE KLL /�/ Ey%/ �� -- "----- D' (_X3TII'Q{COITTWRS ISSUE RATE ............ — �/ 0'---- Ez511r4�SRnn0P4'5E1+E5 LIOC f MULE 10-17-89 LATEST REV // / / _ _= Mini STORM LIRE y- C7ISTII1l,W[IfCR LInE i .2 rim SaMORV SEWER LInC{MWUlOLE i / j"���'' — o ITEJ,I STORM LIRE§CIMINI I1 O...-. nuns warns art!FlR[umlwnT ' OOxOO ROCKERY FF=343 F11SUED FLUOR CLEUarIOn ENT ELE7-385 EnrRv ELEuanon e - PRELIMINARY GRADING & UTILITIES PLAN ' ACIFIC ENGINEERING COMPANY PLANNING'CONSULTANTS G ru G, SGREEN i�a � FENCE(TYR) n w�'a gi • 4 w s� XISTING GIyAINLINe�FENGE Q �3so aC Oe NIGe (TYR) 'E. EK-,- PROPERTY LINE • -ENGE (lYP) 5e S 1 45'25•E 157,87' J T" �l �3g E - - I5I7 7- �, S 2 20'53•E V 333.57' S 1B /-- _ ,� ri-izin 0�.� ♦ _ ��'/ I \� •\ • EXISTING VEGETATION- / O.c»� l/"Oo.) "Qr:� -p P.EMAIN (TYP,) -� \\ ' Osr �.1 o - /,o \ ) ♦_/EXISTwG TREES TCD -'�.6 ( o.->-) '- / \��. , I / ( O`J., �"\ �` ��/' FIDE sAveo (TYP) .✓.A =1 \i (fir J o / J ���/��� e o o. ��-�1=01� ;?I'/ ) Q y J• / L_c� 1 J! / d ��! `�1 1 °� %yam / Co' ! o. O 001U0 F Rae110;4000 019'�e 0,00 (A I. _ r/� '1... o'�' O O00 OOP 0 0is/ .�._ _ _+.�.� �= \ ' `. III• o�� \ o �I,�!,.:%- •.��I.11.:�.., aoo o i.�•. O /�/�. a.- �l.wFe` . .jr0 o000000 •�� O 1 is0� _�,,,�.* .r yo9000�o� o `J • . • /o"'� Y/ •mow• - �•�i�1 11�O^ �1.�ti• o ol./ oo'a _ _ oimi1 • ��•gr"" _ 0 .._ O e e. e.l I . a !or:, ��i .� - ►`?,�-�.�_jcf•-•p OlO- :a - \�' � 0 8 0 4 'Olt � c - ''' 6 0 ' -.- -----.-C__ 0 . 0 .... I.___.1 -. 0 ^-^14 10 I;tal . I O Ew�yT1iN TREE(y TO . I j o J ','' O \ a kar-t?VEU(i`(Fe,) O.-�- O iit O p _ - _ ',Om,09,O \OO•f�0 O o >LI[+oo7 -e 000101 0' • 1 II 6` an( o is�1 'epo'ao?3o°/ O T q o �I �t i \ ��•Or c� !1 ° 0 1' o1^a O. �aO:e�oA►.rsdtird:. ° 4�frl� 4i o - �� {MIa 66 of e ( aooeo:.._i L �..�_ DL•O V7 g -� c- • yo. \�,d c ?Ai I. • o irk O'■ 00 1-' 1 O \. �/ ti J 00° •• O + OUT2JaJK -T.i-y. L1� I)1giO o -` po \_ 'aeXo.q RECREATION' /, \ _• ° I- "' j `r. O ._ •✓^ 000� 000. CFNTIIt . °I/ 2 ill Q o - 1 o oos Ox ••.,,1/0,,,•. ���, 0,_ of °iii \\ • � . .. .::��^J.oj Ji _�.voj r.._l ' • 3 a gPo l a� o �i t �� nn� o Imo' �i • p0p .�. ,..`r;/i •.. .. e�ti.• .. 1vT1 `L� O 00 O LAwtil �_. O f!7:... - ./.A.,, 1- t. _ o I' ® •- 1 v pp .� - Y •;` ,v o wbbdOP.di00. 000'O�O'Qj �O409': AWN Q. '' -—.7+---i-C. I Q ~ - • ° o"; o� f� :;:::. : . .,.T._ . o' . I--i , --5., i^�j �111��j'l.P'*coi..�' • :vaO V j • • 1'� l i 0toc�'� �� 1. _ — PLANT LIST • '_ ' 1L`.�,/ /-V'(1-l/�.)e� � 2t O-.j0,dif , • I - _�I •' DESCRIPTION SIZE - ' •' Ids' - ••...11�Ys-, -, " sJ (SR 51 J" EAIeTING TREES TO BE SAVED AS NOTED SHALL ACCENT TREES , DIY ��.0 '�' gENSON ROAD 0 M. p - VINE MAPLE, NAAGNOLIA HORNBEAM, ♦41;�p� � � e ; - C.corxoNNDOD SHRUBS is^_1e • ' .���f- - ` SHADE TREES 2^CAL �) HEAVENLY PRIVET, ESGLRVITA,LAUREL, -� - V HEAVENLY BAMBOO,ARBORVITAE, ' �N NORWAY MAPLE, REEETGUM,SCARLET OAK, RHODODENDRON, BARBERRY,OREGON W. T •• -2�1Z - IANDON PLANE TREE G fi' GRAPE.JAPANESE HOLLY,SKI191IA, W. J� VIBURNUM • 11,,g5 • - PLOWERIN°AND ACCENT TREES 1-1/2"CAL l'•` GROONDCovER9 qn POT Z t • ARMSTRONG MAPLE, EUROPEAN BIRCH, '. _ } QUAKING ASPEN,HAWTHORN, FLOWER/ ENCLISH IVY BT.JONNSk'ORT,JAPANESE - `11 LANDSCAPE PLAN CHERRY,HONEYLONST �,�-1 SPORGE,JDNIPER,DWARF PERININXLE y = • • GREEN'TREES p XINHICKINNI=A • SCALE: I'=20�-0" 6•_a, W ..--''1 ANNUALS/PEAENNIAL9 6^POT AUSTRIAN PINE,WESTERN RED CEDAR,• I PARKING LOT LANDSCAPING DEOOAR CEDAR, SCOTCH PINE ' PARKING LOT AREA: 28,951 .F. • • PARKING LOT LANDSCAPING REQUIRED: 1,450 S,F. (5%OF 28,951) - ' - PARKING LOT LANDSCAPING PROVIDED: 1,508 S.Y. - D. S - - - - - - - - - - __ - -- I JohnsonBraund design group, inc. architecture. landscape& planning consultants .. •r' T' -,-• , „. . ..__ ,,,,, , .,.. : • _.,..7. • . kkok. lM'„•.6V E�1 r ~ ter;` N I of Z 10/r'. 4; ; 0 ,.`,.1,4111 "1,9W).)11. .." . co �� °O Vr 1 z re, , ., .., z • , , . • „‘f 00 LI• „n ' 000 ��0 i oa it 44 p • . ' , i 1 i 3 • . 1>,' ' • '''.' • • n • .:: / ti , .,.,- , . / 1 ill p . L.,. An , , iI '1IIIIIIIi• H CD a /' / t a r NI I tN •limn. .:,:� . co 's� .Q ' 1 r 1 0I I 1{� 7 0 DA ' m 1 PPoPBRTY :y' a Z m o I • • co7. Greg L.Allwine, . AIA' n n I Protect No• ee-sz wASHNGTTON v CITY LIGHTS APARTMENTS RENTON. WA. REGISTERED Drawn by a,f LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT en 1 1\1 FOR NORTH BAY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATIONC Issue dale lo-I'3-89 633 N.MILDRED. SUITE'G' MELVIN R.FASTER p7 Latest rev TACDMA, WA 98406 (206)555-9E00 f£RDEIC\TE ND AB 7 Mel Easter, ASLA vI i ,130 andover park e., suite 301 seattle, wa. 98188 (206)431-7960 _ R �� lo'xlo' a �I o 0 Uvrng fil i k- 12x12'• Erre4 DIM , _ 3 • .�•..`, Ol W �i O,— C 13v;,Q •4 0�� g°ni IE ll •''i i — o �+ Dinin9 NI "1°xl2 Fain J L 1�s. P <h 0€4,„e7111 I �I -^O O -0 ' 'l i c0 ----1 1'x 14 ' Doi dw i UNIT TYPE A-2 Q &;;ji: I_i, Itt 'Is I I—� ,IN�III19 �I �\ _1710x4r ; J r e. - 26 ti. I-� _ - ,l o 1I _ / �p /_�-'LUO O�e4K IIIIIIYII ��tl [ 0 0 0 VCvI I .$n N P x8' J - _ .. i t 9kr. 0 _ _ '�6u+h �. ..i cot (D�sn N rn IT:51 10l°l Ifl 1 Masi-ex n I F-MEN \/ oan I —iJ et i ' Q�rI ni�WI Imto'WO' as y0. 2Bgi' i 0.] H , o N 1": 12 PUTD1 O NN-]]1 v- F._IIL - iC VLL 9LA r�Q��® O V ,_-! II•x'It ash I 22�-0�� co -� O ~ Glayef O`j e 0 UNIT TYPE A-1 UNIT TYPE C a �T," 1 BEDROOM/ 1 BATH 2 BEDROOM/2 BATH W/STUDY h?;* 3 °� i"" - Uni4- - *82 4•-.. Unit - • -1^l4 4.f. ° ,- _6::� peek - 40 4.f. 2.64.- - (a0 4.-c. y. ^,. (01braje - 2.0 4.f. - h . `. r�lara9e 2a 4.f. � ��•�t,. p 2 i . 1 . I JohnsonBraund- design group, inc. architecture, landscape&planning consultants • 4*'-a" / 0 vil I I 3 .4• If • 1r' x-1. s--- 7 I I 17 i',.W. ... • PI 0 - r-*-3-1 tlilLsii i—11— II •,-/- I •• r" t 1-____t,__I L_____ 1, ,..< , ill .,. 0 - I 1 vi .' ,., - ' _ - I qi-. . .! .• I xi , I .i: :.1 A ___ ,„,„ C- 0 / 45'-c, Z . (1) 0 m co 0 . al 33"• ,, - I I , I- I z m ci. co I t, . I I I t: - I m I ., (-- , , Cl) * I 11 I , I I 172 1.T__ I .• ! I 111 c.O1 • ,. Z lii 3 = 03 —1 r-----.) c TI 1 1 ta t, . .. 0 T cl c, up krz• ) I I I I c'l 11 •„....._,._-_-.-__ F: 8 7 p7) . a 8 a) -0 a) 90 -0 c7) 1- — — I co I Greg L.Allwine, AIA 0 0 ', ". .,)W3.9.('•/1P4:','P?'*'' ' 1 O LI\__J ,- tr,' •"••• '••• A'4%.!...,,, CITY LIGHTS APARTMENTS RENTON, WA. kaRT=4,11,7W1,014;,' FOR NORTH BAY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION Cia c (?r.,R) Igdtte date e.,a5-el• 633 N.MILDRED. SUITE.0• Latest rev:. .., db TACONA. WA 98406 1206)565-9400 '5') 1!=1).sg.i,.a. .!:',.. ',-•,,.'!' 304 main ave.so.,suite 200 renton,wa.98055 (206)271-7200 623-5732 _ Mel Easter, ASLA _ _______.„.„. — _ = w_.. ..._,...,,Itur = — _ --__ ihl ; r =1� G`—-I■■III■4=1■ CI - 'I 'irll_II FE, 1).J l_ _ , _ = - Q I i� I1. C Q 64 in. A' mm1E—A EAST ELEVATION • :pU I L o I N� q-$5 ;�I�13 1_ - ICI I •''�i�=, i51hl�1 II=1 �:I.�'� LIJ I_ — WEST ELEVATION • _Wl...VIN q-+5 N co N — MIA.PW%+lase Cow z ---- _— GoNPOa'fiaN 5F(IN41 a 5%12 .--, PI'fa( - "mow ^� -'11 . r O EE = " 1- I I_ != � IITIr 1 OrdI� W$ —_�— N—_ =-1 w 2.4 WINva.4 'RzM , _ — ■. .--- U" P�Evl;b 91vINCt 111111 II GIh _ =111111 I.I� co - _ ___-1 2„4/20 40214ER1(tA- _ Il ly; r.�i;-��i ... - — ,��_■. o-—_ wa KIa eeur erNo I■■ ■��—IIUI■'=III■ —==;=l��i __-_ _M I■■I I-CSI ro ..® ,::== Nom4� _��III=l�ier1 —=a■ _� Min � � Z MEIN- f�PERPyL _ -— 711144*- 1 I , III -mil 1 g END ELEVATION •�1,IlLVIN651—Cr) ." = `ram-- WEST' ELEVATION • �UILpIN6z 1��, t3111�DW6#2�MII.IPR�+/R�•�f"f1`f�GItED � > a GJLALE%1/0.,i'-on 4�%1•�LEL ,, �I��II = i B m Hog O J a) /NI F C.., g' IIaa l �i .._•:.-__ .= ==rir :CO ■flea _ = __ = �,■1=L1 _ s L. "` — 1 jl'1111A�Iil E_ —_--- l�I�IiI _ ,,,- _ -- ._, — 11,E r''� —.___:_ - h-a —�I,� Ill�ll� _ _— r1l�l■IE��� N! rI —` E€ 6iSa �z tt ffil - ■RIM.- Ll I l l_ � . - ---; _ I-__IN I I — I1 1I - J END ELEVATION • PUIL,0Ir4 S 1,2, 4.'b -N EAST (ENTRY) ELEVATION • 'UIL-PINS 1 4 , E,UILOIN64'2 IM1l.I1-42-•N/I .PI-c ,r6•1-Ti c•heID '.'r'= e)�I,e• Ya"-,1'-01' vc>�•eC• 1 s 1s0' a =-: .17',1_,t .;12 . 2::'.:-E., _ I JohnsonBraund design group, inc. architecture, landscape&planning consultants • St • • • i III I—. ---V _ FL, , . ... . . ._ mR1171:30: ..7,z u, Q ‹, � nR \ .. ..... ...., ED,, ,, V 3 Q 'Cr; J @ Bier 63 a clax y if, STATISTICS _ SHEET INDEX �� El____)1481.8.0.M...t.. °� `� APPLICANT: North Bay Development Corporation CS COVER SHEET __ ( ^I ,' 6]J North Mildietl L- ' - r 'ra�1 Suite G P1 SITE PLAN �(�/� I 1'I1 CD Tacoma,WA 98406 7 _ .�;rI N"""�-3 1( (206) 565-9400 PIA GRADING 6 DRAINAGE PLAN _/U__y I , I n I .. • \ U• rlev.IJ ARCHITECT/LANDSCAPE P1B LANDSCAPE PLAN "/L- I ------ I ii I ARCHITECT: Johnson Braund Design Group, Inc. Q riuzwN:c,Cr " 304 Main Ave.South,Suite 200 PIC SITE SEIONS /g-- 4__ b Renton,WA 98055 d G o ,r (206) 271-7200 P2 UNIT PLANS (A1,A2,C) i/'l--_-_i ('y` _---- _ CIVIL ENGINEER: Pacific Engineering PJ UNIT PLANS (B L GARAGES) ' �o -----• !%///�/// —.— .4 Main Ave. south,Suite 300 --''''''i:,,,,. CV Renton,WA 98055 P4 BUILDING ELEVATIONS I[L-_ o i% - -=� (206) 235-6688 I" w / ��Il 1 _ s SITE SURVEY ¢ o�I � g/ PROJECT SITE ','F9t°B:Pfnux exuxcx • E AREA 0.10 Acres (4,564 1 S.F.) ��"_-_�Ipp i' u I / /// /I 00 s (OEDICATION) 0.30 acres (<,564 S.F:1 O 1 V'--�-F I•, �,'- VB ` E%:EYING ZONE U' ---__, • op (OMIT°/ACAS): R3(25:1) 1 'li\ V % CT PAIIMOH°NITS ALLOWED: 80.0 • 11 r)_ �l xIl ;❑��/ V:C Iri PROPOSED GNITS • `('1, I\-J' S, I1 U�v���iW[xTe • N Typo A-1 (Sbdrm,iba): 17 11 5� -�"' 5 I 2 SF - `1r�L,ri�� /�I` Type A-2 (ibdrm,lba): 18 OPp kg' " ' r l;.S'��J �}Y Z T32 SF o P : " �C3 F W ai Type B Md.., Ina): 8 $N �,A � C3 54 sF 0EN ';` - "` `ra3 . }�/ /y��]Tr AlType C(Ibdrm,Study,2ba1: 18 / �. •�'I �+• M V/)nIgo.) -(] 1 S F T „ (n 94 SF c " �t f� , c� :� ry� h • a $ 0 Total Proposed Units: 61 • l \'$' [1� •`� / DEVELOPMENT DENSITY ;- 4� � -Y/e a '. (UNITS/ACRE): 19.0 ,1_.-::::----‘-"-. = �'� ° �'�.��. e °� PARKING \, W� / / • r n (n PARKING stalls at 1� Y I I / \ ✓ RESIDENTIAL -�." N 1 es it: 61x1.5=92 '^'w �m4 o Units: at VICINITY MAP �1 ad.,6.,200 _< o Total stalls required: Say • i OT m i 4 c_ (NC): 3 (Standard): Is " o (compact): 29 a'° �' Total Stalls Provided: 307 ~• O LOT 2, CITY OF AENTON SNORT PLAT NUMBER 070-80 (ALSO ANOWN AS NELSON r..) Covered Stalls MIDDLE SCHOOL SHORT PLAT), RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8107299002, (Catporta): SJ - SAID LOT 2 BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: CO (Garages): 8 - THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTH QUARTER OF SECTION 0 29, TOWNSHIP-23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILIAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN RING CO BUILDING COMPOSITION: COUNTY,WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FDLL,DWS, Bldgs. 183 6^A-i^units, 6"A-2"units, 6"C"units BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION:THENCE NORTH 88 Gross floor(living) area. 20,412 S.F. _ DECREES 12'38"EAST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE THEREOF 337.77 FEET; Bldg. 2 5"A-1^units, 6"A-2"units, 12"C",units - THENCE NORTH 1 DEGREES 42'40^EAST 749.65 FEEL TO THE TRUE POINT OF lllll�_ 1 unit With rental storage lockets. BEGINNING; Gross floor arch (incl. storage) 14,448'S.F. THENCE NORTH 88 DEGREES 17'20^WE 191.67 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF BENSON ROAD(STATE ROAD 110.5):. 0 . Bldgs. 4 8"B"units THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID EAST LINE TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID Gross floor(living) area T,632 S.F. SECTION 29; THENCE NORTH 87 DEGREES 08'52"EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF SECTION :1 ` 29 TO A POINT WHICH IS SOUTH 87 DEGREES 08'52^ WEST A DISTANCE OF LO ll PERVIOUS AREA: 989.22 FEET FROM THE NORTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; •1 MMOORISAec.CevLei: 23,040 S.F. THENCE SOUTH 02 DEGREES 24'53"EAST A DISTANCE OF 363.57 FEET; m 3 ' Parking,Drives 6 THENCE SOUTH 18 DEGREES 51'39^EAST A DISTANCE OF 50.24 FEEL: .. .. Walks: 41,295 S.F. THENCE SOUTH 01 DEGREES 45'25^EAST A DISTANCE OF 190.67 FEET MORE OR > 112 ' LESS TO A POINT WHICH BEARS SOUTH 88 DEGREES 17'20^EAST FROM THE TRUE 0 .0 OJ 2TOTALS: 64,]]5 S.F. (45k) POINT OF BEGINNING: 0THENCE NORTH 88 DEGREES 1'1'20" WEST 47.21 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE C) C OPEN SPACE/ TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; N % N Id LANDSCAPE AREA: 29,849 S.F. (551) EXCEPT THE NORTH 30 FEET THEREOF, LYING WITHIN BOW LANE PIPE LINE O` RIGHT OF WAY. [1 O N J Building Setbacks: Front-30 Peet • Bide -12 fee`' LEGAL DESCRIPTION, Rear -12 feet Y Building Height: Allayed -50 Peet • l , - - ' Provided-SO Tes. 35 feet - _ ' Ca . I - , 1 JohnsonBraund design group, inc. architecture, landscape&planning consultants 30 \ 3AlY AND TD � GGAHIC SURVEY A PORTION OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M. CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON Z SCALE: 1 a=20' .a:ar rate --------,I:ne: ±.:aaE a5a5 t5 t@ZfJ' js t 4s�2s. t.aa.:EKS,e•eeen, . — aJ sses ees _ ,' jr — _ _ _ 333.57, �—� —F �� -�� _ r5224'g3'E // — —� —Q� -"gy r— —� "�— pl‘ .r— � LTN D .ram _ r 'L — \\ \\ \ � � +\ �° � \ �— '^r�c r—\ Q — o ctas:eEE �— �rre O 33 ,rri6 ---_waTEm«reE , Ea„ER — �- . -- 2. i CONIFEROUS TREE - ° I —�� 3n\a.eo a REC. r � I�}-_/ r O rf — \ EDGE OE.swu2 —e \— /O'LO_'� ¢ 1 3."•�"" r I------- ' �n °\ -\ / Q � 1. • PAINTED.,rE�nre g * \ _/ , / \�1 ,. a ~ r ▪ vaoLE 'y /I�j� mE svr \ --- —� ° v05Ewsur POLE °r 0° ✓ r �/ � I 1 \ �� - \N �i cc_-__ I` FOG LINE CC' I ' � a rawEt.E o ° °a / / I I)g 9� _ \ -- I., ,,,z°\t. o r o • GUANO POST 0*.- �11 E \ r * - �,. \o ( \ \ ,l — ice \ oE��`/// / ° o r ." ° 1 \\e� "ate — — _— _ .r=s� \ la � J {\S\ o em E /Gr \ N O ���^' /����116�, \T•", n sf• ..e \ o'o'' o r,` I I V',I/_ o o �.� �,.\ \ �_ / 1 I\ \ \ \I ,.!'• ROADWAY.UTILITY.AND SLOPE ESN'T,nENTOn SP.0 - \ m ft. ow I lik ..--=.— A; „6-___-_°0_7/ /_„./_:/ ,I ii4\,Ii0, - \ �a Hann m 0.:m m.�i ..r \ - R // .� r� � ;' °_ 5T TE HIGHWl1`C 5•G. \ I IItRITI'ES=T / / /. [�_•,.4� /�—- rovn�¢c v t� am� 't.E..µ.. v. ' : rue W atKa a n.avt Teie.MH'. :.e.t2 .an<s-rea.m ...ar. 01' et:- if S.:' Ss a t. a e-5to 5a a „'''',•.,.C•2;- %-.,r, CITY LIGHTS APARTMENTS MUM. la. 3014 Barghausen FOR ~ :„OBER�trE.E�..:a Consulting Engineers Inc. uu 90' ce 11 08 a0a 5°5'8e00 1 Qe,1 Land Planning,Survey 8e Engineering Speclallsls tem5 22na Av saran sent.W n.sew: 12061 26ee222 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: DATE CIRCULATED: July 20, 1989 COMMENTS DUE: August 2, 1989 ECF-087-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA; ECF-087-89 PROPONENT: North Bay Development Corporation/Melvin Easter, Johnson Braund Design Group. PROJECT TITLE: City Lights Apartments BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 70 unit apartment complex to be located on a vacant 3 . 3 acre R3-zoned parcel . (Note: Density level has been adjusted for greenbelt on-site. ) LOCATION: East side of Benson Road between Puget Drive and south 26th Street across from Victoria Hills apartment complex. SITE AREA: 3 . 31 acres BUILDING AREA (gross) : 49, 656 square feet total (23 , 040 square feet ground floor area) . IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° 2 . Air ° 3 . Water ° 4 . Plants ° 5. Animals ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° 7. Environmental Health ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° 9. Housing ° 10. Aesthetics ° 11. Light & Glare ° 12 . Recreation ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° 14 . Transportation ° 15. Public Services ° 16. Utilities ° COMMENTS: l;'• Ltd We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Rev. 6/88 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-087-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA; ECF-087-89 PROPONENT: North Bay Development Corporation/Melvin Easter, Johnson Braund Design Group. PROJECT TITLE: City Lights Apartments. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 70 unit apartment complex to be located on a vacant 3 .3 acre R-3-zoned parcel. (Note: Density level has been adjusted for greenbelt on-site. ) LOCATION: East side of Benson Road between Puget Drive and South 26th Street. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON AUGUST 2, 1989. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED DATE SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 BEGINNING OF FILE FILE TITLE SASos' ?- 08147. _ . 11.19 , I Z.'om. _ r') , COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE -- STAFF REPORT August 9, 1989 A. BACKGROUND: 'APPLICANT: North Bay Development Corporation Melvin Easter, Johnson Braund Design Group E PROJECT: City Lights Apartments - _ ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF; SA-087-89 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 70 unit apartment complex to be located on a vacant 3 . 3 acre R-3, Multi-Family Residential, zoned parcel. (Note: Density level has been adjusted for greenbelt area located on the site. ) LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: East side of Benson Road between Puget Drive and South 26th Street across from Victoria Hills apartment complex. • • • . __. _.._.-y_ =�,y• ;, rti ^----_._ — — •.. • • ; `:t ,C 01. 1 NUM�GMoQI 1 -- CI �•I • , 7 iei.,.. .........__. \\ . . r 1 r._ )t, : . ......„ _ .•_...,., . , . . ,,,.... ,..... . . . .. . 1 0•••••• • .--17. 1. o )�:r._�• �•� I� 1PflOJECT SITE i I• 1 • . Technical Advise Committee Staff Report • .City Lights Apar. :nts ,Page 2 August 9, 1989 B. ISSUES: (LAND USE ELEMENTS) 1. Whether the proposed development is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan Map designation and Comprehensive Plan Goals, Policies and Objectives for the site? The majority of the subject property is designated for medium density multi-family development; a section along the eastern periphery of the site is designated as "greenbelt" due to both the presence of steep slopes (approximately 50%) and natural vegetation. A multi-family residential complex is potentially consistent with the residential designation. Likewise, it would be potentially compatible with the "greenbelt" designation, as no development is planned for that area, and, as density levels proposed for the remainder of the parcel have been reduced to conform to the Zoning Ordinance requirements (See Section 2 , Land Use, for more information) . Multi-family residential development on this site is also generally consistent with Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies for residential development, such as IV.A, which calls for sound, viable • neighborhoods to be created, IV.A. 1, which calls for housing densities and types to suit a variety of life circumstances and life styles; IV.A. 6. , which calls for a balance to be maintained between housing and available access, utilities and community facilities; IV.A. 9. , which calls for a variety of design/location patterns in housing; IV. B. 3 . , which calls for dwellings to take advantage of views and site character; IV.C. 3 . which calls for multi-family dwellings to be located hear arterials; IV.C.4/5 which calls for medium density multi-family housing to serve as a buffer between lower density residential uses and non- residential (commercial, public) uses; IV.C.7 . which calls for basic amenities which are available to single-family residences to be available to residents of multi-family dwellings, and IV.C.8, which calls for multi-family dwellings to be located near employment and shopping centers. Similarly, the proposed development is consistent with Comprehensive Plans policies for Urban Design, which call for development to occur in a timely and logical progression (III.A) and with general goals for development in Southeast Renton, which call for multi-family uses in the area for which City Lights Apartments are proposed. 2 . Whether the proposed development conforms to Zoning Ordinance requirements which are applicable to residential uses on the subject parcel? The proposed development is permitted under the Zoning Ordinance Land. Use designation of R-3 , Medium Density residential development which has been applied to this site. The development has been proposed to include 70 dwelling units (housing approximately 126 persons) on a 3 . 3 acre site, or 21 units per acre. This density is the maximum permitted for this site, because approximately . 5 acre of the parcel is a greenbelt area which is sloped at 50% and, therefore, is undevelopable. While addressing conceptual density requirements, the planned project density/design, nonetheless, appears to conflict with criteria which must be addressed in conjunction with environmental review (See Environmental Elements Section below) . Also, it appears that the proposed development will be required to be modified to conform to criteria established for site plan review by the Site Plan Review Ordinance (4-738) and .for the Landscaping Ordinance (4-744) . The proposed residential complex does generally meet development standards established for multi-family housing in the R-3 zone (e.g. height, bulk) , however, the applicant would need to obtain a variance to allow a front yard of 22 feet rather than the customary 30 feet (to allow the retention of a roadway easement on the western boundary of the property) . Technical Advisor- Committee Staff Report r • .City Lights Apar, mts Page 3 August 9, 1989 The applicant has proposed that some of the access routes to and through the site be at a grade of greater than the customarily permitted eight (8) percent; a variance must be obtained from the Board of Public Works to permit those access routes. Otherwise, the proposed development does generally conform to requirements established in the Parking and Loading Ordinance (4-2204) . Some question is raised by public school system representatives concerning the capacity of the local public school system to accommodate the 18 school-aged children anticipated to live in this complex. (Note: While the proponent intends to design and market this complex to serve young professionals, rather than to families, regulations prohibit the type of tenant selection which would exclude children from the development) . 3 . Whether the proposed development is compatible with vicinity uses? Multi-family development would appear to be suitable on the subject parcel, which is surrounded to the west with existing multi-family residential uses and a single-family residential complex now under construction, to the north by multi-family residential units, to the south by a church, and to the east by two public schools. As noted previously, however, the proposed 70 units may need to be reduced, and other mitigation measures may need to be required,, in order to address on-site and off-site impacts from the project so that the development is compatible with adjacent uses. Of particular concern is the need to ensure that the nearby schools and church neither are impacted by nor impact the proposed City Lights complex. (ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS) 1. Whether the proponent has adequately identified and address environmental impacts anticipated to occur in conjunction with the proposed development? a) Housing Impacts: As noted previously the City's Comprehensive Plan and local marketing analyses call for an increase in multi-family residential development in the City of Renton. Question is raised, however, concerning the capacity of the site to accommodate 70 dwelling units and required/recommended amenities. There is also concern about the capacity of the City's infrastructure/public service system to accommodate the proposed 70 units. Mitigation Measures: That the applicant be required to reduce the proposed development from 70 units to 61 units, through a decrease in the number of Type "C" apartments from 18 to 9 units (a reduction in three "C" units each in Building 1, Building 2 and Building 3) . This modification would serve to ensure ,a more ambient development (e.g. more open space) , as well as reducing the type/level of impact upon surrounding developments and vicinity land uses/services/infrastructure. Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance 4-2822 ; WAC 197-11- 960, B.9. b) Land Use/Aesthetics Impacts: The project site poses several challenges for development, including its irregular configuration, steep terrain, and the presence of several easements which restrict location of structures and impervious surfaces. Within the given constraints, the proponent has succeeded in planning attractive structures which are proposed to be constructed of durable materials (e.g. wood siding and pitched heavy-duty composition roofing) . Structures are well-separated from one Technical Advisory Committee Staff Report • . • City Lights Apar mts ' Page 4 'August 9, 1989 another spatially (a minimum distance of 40 feet between buildings) and by terrain differential; however, Building #1 and the parking east of that building are located quite close to the north property line, providing a minimal buffer between those uses and the property line, and resulting in the removal of trees which form a natural visual. buffer. An indoor recreation center is provided; this center is oriented , toward adult activities because the development is planned to be designed/marketed to an adult population. Concern is raised about the proximity of the recreation center to Building #2 . Concern is raised about the, absence of outdoor recreation facilities for children or adults and the lack of a congregate area. ' Open and enclosed parking is provided which is architecturally integrated with the dwelling units. Staff note that the greenbelt will be retained with natural vegetation, providing a unique amenity for residents. However, as a result of the proposed level of density, substantial natural vegetation is slated to be removed from the portion of the site which is to be developed; this vegetation is to be replaced with structures and/or parking areas. New plantings are proposed to be included in this development, but the plans presented do not meet requirements established by the City's Landscaping Ordinance. Additionally, to support this level of development on the sloped terrain, roadways with a grade of greater than 8% and retention walls of up to 15 feet in height are being proposed. Further, the proposed level of density requires that a variance be sought to permit development on eight feet of the customarily required thirty foot front yard setback (as• a result of the existence of a right- of-way easement on the front/western boundary of the site) . In order to address these concerns, staff recommend a reduction in density level from 70 units, to 61 units. With this reduction, staff believe that the development would be more compatible with site characteristics (e.g. sloped terrain) and with neighboring developments, as well as better able to be supported by existing/planned public services/facilities. Mitigation Measures: 1) That the applicant provide a revised site plan reducing the number of housing units from 70 to 61, and reducing parking areas correspondingly, expanding indoor and outdoor recreation areas, and relocating Building #1 and the parking area east of that building away from the north property line. 2) That the applicant provide a revised landscaping plan which addresses Code requirements, replaces the nine eliminated units (and attendant parking spaces). with landscaped open space and outdoor recreation areas (for adults and children) , and. which retains existing conifers. No trees are to be cut until the landscaping plan is approved. These plans must be approved by the Planning Division in advance of evaluation of the project by the Environmental Review Committee.' Note: At the time of site plan review, staff may recommend specific exterior materials and design features for structures, amenities (parking, areas, recreation areas, service areas, lighting, signage) and open areas to ensure compliance with the Site Plan Review Ordinance and to protect compatibility of the proposed development with abutting uses. Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance 4-2822 ; WAC 197-11- 960, B. 1. B.4. , B.8, B. 10. Technical Advisory Committee Staff Report • - • . City Lights Apar' ants Page 5 August 9, 1989 c) Earth/Natural Environment Impacts: The proponent has proposed to retain the existing steeply-sloped greenbelt and to maintain the vegetation located in this area. This will result in the preservation of a significant portion of the natural environment. The portion of the site that is to be developed will be balanced by the relocation of approximately 10, 000 cubic yards of soil excavated and filled from that site; the grading plan will need to be approved by the Public Works and Building Departments, according to City regulations, to protect the site against erosion during construction or operation. The plan for landscaping the portion of the site slated for development, however, will require revision to protect the existing , stands of significant conifers and to incorporate a greater number of new plantings then is presently proposed (See Section 2 .b. ) . The two sections of the site are proposed to be separated by • retaining walls; retaining walls are proposed elsewhere on the property to protect the terrain from erosion. Additionally, the applicant plans to redesign/relocate storm drainage easements to accommodate the proposed development. Public Works Department staff Mitigation Measures: That the applicant be required to provide a conceptyal design plan for all retaining walls and rockeries subject' ,to approval by the Design Engineering Division and the • ,. Building Division, in advance of evaluation by the Environmental `;:Review Committee. • Note, #1: The applicant will be required to provide a plan for ecommodating both planned structures and existing open drainage ,4' channels in order to protect site integrity (See Section 2 . f) . Note #2: ' Staff has recommended that the applicant be required to develop a revised landscaping plan to supplement vegetation retention on the sloped area in a previous section of this report (See Section 2 .b. ) . The applicant has agreed to retain the greenbelt area with natural vegetation. Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance 4-2822 ; WAC 197-11- 960 B. 1. d) Traffic Circulation • Impacts: The development as proposed is anticipated to generate approximately 462 ADWVTE; the development as recommended is anticipated to generate approximately 400 ADWVTE. In order to identify off-site circulation impacts and establish parameters for measures to mitigate these impacts, the applicant has agreed to provide a traffic analysis which will supplement an analysis recently completed for the project area in conjunction with a similar -- but smaller -- residential development in this vicinity. Based upon the earlier study, some basic guidelines for mitigation have been delineated by the Traffic Engineering Division, and the applicant has agreed, in principle, to contribute a fair share to regional improvements (e.g. signalization of the S.E. 31st Street/Benson Road intersection, increasing the width of Benson Road) . The applicant has also agreed to provide required off-site improvements and to maintain a currently existing easement on the western boundary of. the site to facilitate future roadway improvements. ,On-site traffic impacts are anticipated by virtue of the fact that roadways are steeply graded, limiting both visibility and unimpeded travel. This impact is mitigated, in part, by the presence of- two access points, and further improvement could be obtained through redesign/regrading of the roadways following the recommended ' removal of six units from the site. The site does provide Technical Advisory Committee Staff Report - - . City Lights Apar ants Page 6 • "August 9, 1989 reasonably conveniently located, accessible parking areas. On-site lighting and signage plans will need to be improved to more fully illuminate/define the circulation routes and parking areas on the site. Mitigation Measures: 1) That the applicant be required to provide a traffic mitigation plan which includes off-site improvements adjacent to the site, the retention of the right-of-way easement on Benson Road, and a fair share contribution to regional improvements. This plan is! subject .to approval by the Traffic Engineering Division in advance of the issuance of site preparation/building permit. 2) That the applicant be required to provide on-site illumination and signage plans, subject to approval by the Planning Division in} conjunction with site plan review. Policy Nexus: Environmental, Review Ordinance 4-2822 ; WAC 197-11-960 B. 14. e) Noise, light and glare Impacts: The proposed/recommended residential development is not anticipated to generate noise beyond that customarily anticipated from a multi-family residential development. Substantial separation between structures will serve to limit noise. Some noise is anticipated, however, from the recreation center due to its proximity to Building #2 . Noise would also be anticipated from outdoor recreation activities. Additionally, sound would be anticipated to occur to the..site from the abutting roadway (Old . Benson Road) and nearby public schools. Recommendations for reduction of the number of units in the complex -- thereby allowing for better separation between units, and more substantial setbacks -- together with recommendations for interior insulation should serve to limit noise impacts to and from the residential complex. Light and glare is anticipated to be generated to the site from both vehicles traversing on-site roadways and adjacent Old Benson Road, due to terrain differential arid steeply graded roads. Light may also be generated from on-site exterior lighting fixtures. Recommendations for reduction of units, thereby providing more space which may allow the development of new, less steep road grades, recommendations for landscaping and screening, and recommendations for on-site lighting plans should serve to mitigate light and glare impacts. Mitigation Measures: 1) That the applicant be required to provide insulation to limit interior ambient noise in living units and indoor recreation areas to 50 dBA. 2) That the applicant be required to separate the recreation building from Building #2 by a minimum distance of 20 feet. 3) That the applicant be required to provide a plan for screening at all boundaries of the site, utilizing acoustically designed wood fencing and/or rockery or retaining walls to provide mitigation of noise, light and glare from the abutting roadway and nearby land uses. (Note: fencing provides site definition which is valuable for crime prevention as well. ) These plans should be subject to approval by the Planning Division and the Public Works Department in advance of evaluation by the Environmental Review Committee. Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance 4-2822 ; WAC 197-11-960 B.7. f) Public Services and Utilities 1) Utility lines Impacts: Utility services are available to serve the site; lines may be required to be relocated and systems connection fees may be assessed. Technical Advisory Committee Staff Report - City Lights Apar :nts Page 7 'August 9, 1989 The applicant is seeking to develop over existing utilities easements but has made no formal request to release such existing easements and has submitted no plan to relocate utility lines within the easements. Mitigation Measures: 1) That the applicant be required to obtain necessary easement releases and approval of conceptual utility line relocation plans OR redesign the proposed development so that easements are retained and no structures are located in the easement areas, subject to approval by the Utilities Engineering Division, in advance of review by the Environmental Review Committee. Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance 4-2822 ; WAC 197- 11-960 B. 16. 2) Storm Drainage Impacts: Storm drainage management can be provided on this site, however, the steep terrain, the presence of an open drainage channel and the existence of storm drainage easements must be addressed by the applicant. At present the applicant has not yet obtained approval in principle for the plan to place structures on the storm drainage easements, nor has approval been obtained to, relocate those channels. The tentative plan to place structures over the storm water channel and/or to include a portion of the management system in the roadway easement is not acceptable to staff. Neither has a biofiltration system been incorporated in the preliminary management plan. Mitigation Measures:. That the applicant be required to provide a conceptual plan for a storm drainage management system, and for the location of structures in a way which facilitates storm drainage management, subject to approval by the Public Works Department. This plan shall be approved prior to. evaluation of the proposed development by the Environmental Review Committee. Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance 4-2822 ; WAC 197- 11-960.`B. 1, B. 3 , B. 16. 3) Fire and Police Services Impacts: Fire and Police. Department representatives anticipate only the customary type/number of calls to the proposed development. Standard code based improvements, supplemented by a management plan, are expected to be sufficient to permit adequate service to the site. Improved exterior illumination and signage (recommended in Section 2 .b. of this report) is supported by the Fire and Police Departments to facilitate emergency services and to reduce criminal activity. Mitigation Measures: See Section 2 .b. Note: Staff recommend that the applicant be required to provide a management plan, subject to approval by the Police Department, in advance of issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. Policy Nexus: Not applicable 4) Schools Impacts: With 70 dwelling units, the proposed development is anticipated to generate a maximum of approximately 18 school- ) aged children. With the recommended 61 dwelling units, the development is anticipated to generate a maximum of Technical Advisor 'ommittee Staff Report City Lights Apartments Page 8 August 9, 1989 approximately 15 students. Because the development is designed to be oriented toward adults rather than toward families, it is possible that fewer than the expected number of children will reside here. School District officials report that the estimated number of children can be accommodated at nearby Tiffany Park Elementary School, Nelson Middle School and Lindbergh High School. Mitigation Measures: None required. Policy Nexus: Not applicable. 5) Recreation facilities Impacts: The proponent has provided an indoor recreation center including a spa, exercise room and lounge, as well as a small outdoor deck. Staff recommend that this facility be relocated away from Building #2 , and that the deck area be expanded Indoor amenities should be provided for children and young adults (although the project is adult-oriented, children cannot be prohibited and, therefore, those families who may choose to live at City Lights should have amenities available to them. Additionally, outdoor recreational opportunities should be provided, including outdoor seating areas, and active play areas (e.g. sports court, half basketball court) . If feasible, a roof garden could be provided above the recreation center. Mitigation Measures: That the applicant provide a revised on- site recreation plan in conjunction with the revised site plan required in Section 2 .b. above. This plan should be approved by the Planning Division and the Parks and Recreation Department in advance of evaluation of the project by the Environmental Review Committee. Note: Staff may require a contribution to off-site recreational development in the event that on-site amenities are deemed insufficient to mitigate recreational impacts to the community. Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance, 4-2822 ; WAC 197-11-960 B. 12 . ; Comprehensive Parks Plan. g. Construction Impacts Impacts: Grading, filling (of material excavated on the site) and construction on this site is anticipated to create noise impacts, erosion, dust and debris, and traffic impacts. Standard mitigation plans are considered to be generally adequate to address these issues. Special care will need to be taken in the development of an erosion control plan due to the steep terrain. Mitigation Measures: That the applicant be required to provide a construction management plan including: a) an erosion control plan; b) a .plan for wheel-washing of construction trucks prior to departure from the site; c) a plan for periodic watering down of the site to control dust; d) a plan for hauling hours and routes to control traffic impacts; e) a plan for construction hours to mitigate noise impacts; and f) a street clean-up bond in the amount of $2000, 00. These plans are subject to approval by the Public Works Department, Fire Prevention Bureau, Police Department and Planning Division, prior to the issuance of site preparation • permits. Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance 4-2822; WAC 197-11- 960 B. 1,' B.7, B. 11, .B. 14. C. RECOMMENDATIONS: That the project be remanded to the applicant to provide analyses and plans as required above. Technical Advisory Committee Staff Report - - ' ` •City Lights Apar :ribs Page 9 ' August 9, 1989 D. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS: Various City departments have reviewed and commented upon the project. These comments are as follows: LAND USE COMMENTS Police Department: Land Use: Approved with conditions. 1) Installation of tot lot area for toddlers. 2) Installation of lighting within stairwell, particularly ground level on buildings 4 and 5 (those with garages) . 3) Approved numbering system. Fire Prevention Bureau: Land Use: Approved with conditions. Any development and/or construction shall comply with current Fire and Building Codes and Ordinances. A second means of approved access is required. Fire Department access road/lanes shall be paved minimum width 20' ; minimum height 13'6" . Preliminary fire flow calculations show a fire flow of 3250 is required. 3 hydrants with a minimum flow of 1000 gpm each is required. Primary hydrant is required to be within 150 feet of the structure. Secondary hydrants are required to be within 300 feet of the structure. An approved automatic sprinkler system is required . to protect the total structure. All fire department access roads are to be paved and installed prior to construction. All fire hydrants are required to be installed an approved prior to construction. Design Engineering: Land Use: Not approved. 1) Temporary erosion control and storm drainage will be critical with this project. 2) Roadway grades exceeding 8% require approval from Board of Public Works. 3) Possible conflict with rockery wall being set in 20' util/road easement adj . to Benson Rd. 4) Full offsite imp. required on Benson Rd. This Department cannot approve preliminary plans. Traffic Engineering: Land Use: No comment sheet. Utility Engineering: Land Use: Not approved. All requests for the release of City easements must follow process and procedure set by City. Water and sewer system development charge - $24,500. Separate water and sewer plans required. Approved fire hydrant locations by .Fire Dept. Fire flow analysis may be required. Existing sanitary sewer line must be relocated. Require plans for developers extensions of existing utilities per Renton standards. Storm Water Utility: Not approved. 1) Open drainage channel needs to be left open unless it is shown that such channel presents an erosion' problem. 2) A temporary erosion control plan needs to be provided and Technical Advisory Committee Staff Report City Lights Apar nts Page 10 • ' 'August 9, 1989 work will be performed within a May 1st through September 1st construction window. 3) Detention system should be located outside of the roadway easement. 4) Detention will be based upon a 25 year storm with a 5 year release rate. Existing detention will need to be accounted for in design. 5) A baffled oil/water separator will be required. A biofiltration swale should be incorporated into the design. Parks and Recreation: Land Use: Not approved. Need more information. Building Division: Land Use: Not approved. 1) Rockeries not appropriate as retaining walls. 2) Buildings are over easements. Piping may not be proper for under buildings. 3) No building code check done. Current Planning Division: Land Use: 1) Preservation of additional trees on site should be required. 2) Additional coniferous tree planting should be done along the north and south sides for additional buffering. 3) Pedestrian walkways should connect to sidewalk along Benson Road. 4) Picnic tables and seating areas would be desirable around the complex. 5) Driveway grades ' exceeds 8% on the site and can only exceed this by approval from the Board of Adjustment. 6) Landscaping to north is not even to min. 5' width by parking lot. 7) Need detail of project sign to approve. 8) Rockeries and retaining walls should be softened with vegetation. 9) Recommend smaller, pedestrian scale lighting standards around walkways and entrances to buildings. Long Range Planning: Land Use: Request for more information. Proposed project may leave substantial impacts on traffic, storm drainage system, vegetation, aesthetics, and parks and recreation facilities. The proposed density is too high for the area. The site is rather hilly and steep (steepest slope on the site is about 40%) . Cut and fill will be utilized for the development. This would change the material land form and features of the site ; it may create significant erosion problems. The applicant should prepare an expanded initial study to address the impacts, particularly, the cumulative impacts on the areas mentioned above. ENVIRONMENTAL COMMENTS Police Department: Probable minor impact - public services. There is no indication of a "tot lot" or other toddler play area. There should be. Unit number will need to be approved by police. Lighting will need to be installed within stair well. Vehicle access is poor to this location. Fire Prevention Bureau: Probable minor impact - public services. Technical Advisory Committee Staff Report City Lights Apar `hnts Page 11 'August 9, 1989 Design Engineering: Probable minor impact - transportation and utilities. All requests for the release of City easements must follow process and procedure set by City. Water and sewer system development charge - $24,500. Separate water and sewer plans required. Approved fire , hydrant locations by Fire Dept. Fire flow analysis may be required. Existing sanitary sewer line must be relocated. Require plans for developers extensions of existing utilities per Renton standards. Traffic Engineering: No comment sheet. Utility Engineering: Probable minor impact - utilities. 1) Existing sanitary sewer line for Fred. Nelson School must be relocated. 2) Require watermain extension and sewer extension. 3) Require plans for above extensions per City's standards for development extension. 4) Require release of easements by City Council, through easement vacation procedures. Storm Water Utilities: Probable minor impact - water. 1) Open drainage channel needs to be left open unless it is shown that such channel presents an erosion problem. * 2) A temporary erosion control plan needs to be provided and work will be performed within a May 1st through September 1st construction window. 3) Detention system should be located outside of the roadway easement. 4) Detention will be based upon a 25 year storm with a 5 year release rate. Existing detention will need to be accounted for in design. 5) A baffled oil/water separator will be required. A biofiltration swale should be incorporated into the design. Parks and Recreation: More information necessary. In addition to on-site recreational impacts. This action will increase the City's need for park land by 1.47 acres (Park Comprehensive Plan standards) . What is the proposed mitigation of this impact? Building Division: Probable minor impact - housing. Current Planning Division: 1) A poor job has been done on preserving existing native trees on the site, especially to the north, south, and west sides. 2) Note: Rockeries appear too high. Civil drawing illustrates rockery as high as 15 feet. 3) Note: buildings are constructed over storm drainage and sanitary sewer easements. Technical Advisor Committee Staff Report .. City Lights Apar' `nts Page 12 August 9, 1989 Long Range Planning: Request for more information. Proposed project may leave -substantial impacts on traffic, storm drainage system, vegetation, aesthetics, and parks and recreation facilities. The proposed density is too high for the area. The site is rather hilly and steep (steepest slope on the site is about 40%) . Cut and fill will be utilized for the development. This would change the material land form and features of the site ; it may create significant erosion problems. The applicant should prepare an expanded initial study to address the, impacts, particularly, the cumulative impacts on the areas mentioned above. mil r • • COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE STAFF REPORT October 27, . 1989 A. BACKGROUND: APPLICANT: North Bay Development Corporation Melvin Easter, Johnson Braund Design Group • PROJECT: • City Lights Apartments ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF; SA-087-89 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: • Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 61 unit apartment complex to be located on a vacant 3 . 3 acre R-3 , Multi-Family Residential, zoned parcel. (Note: Density level has been adjusted for greenbelt area located on the site. ) LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: East side of Benson Road between Puget Drive and South 26th Street across from Victoria Hills apartment complex. • F40.1)41.),ICNO MN 1[ I .. . j ^M�LP.i ,� Ol 1. 1 I lilaM Sent • . .1.--_ r J • • %,....___.......;* r �' �'�• 'I + PnOJECT SITE// :"= . Z III C:j ".: J. 6„:i:::§1 e/ /7/./ t- 4 (f,-------mi.k..g s-c-.1. • I . / •�Mt r .. ( V�� / • 1 ---C..?!P--0)1'- '41t1::fe--":- IC)tbN4Dri61Q.)Y. # • • lug . Technical Advisory Commis e Staff Report City Lights Apartments Page 2 October 27, 1989 B. ISSUES: (HISTORY) Applicant submitted for site plan approval for a 70 unit development on this site in August, 1989 . The plan was reviewed by TAC on August 27 , 1989. The Committee agreed that the site was generally capable of supporting multi-family development, but several areas of concern were identified -- level of density, location of structures over storm drainage channels, setbacks from Benson Road (absence of a variance application) , limited on-site recreational amenities, and potential noise, light and glare impacts. The application was remanded to the proponent for revision. Revised plans were submitted on October 19 , 1989 . The application was not recirculated throughout the City, but comments (appended to this report) were obtained from selected divisions/departments in order to ascertain that major concerns had been addressed. (LAND USE ELEMENTS) 1. Whether the proposed development is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan Map designation and Comprehensive Plan Goals, Policies and Objectives for the site? The majority of the subject, property is designated for medium density multi-family development; a section along the eastern periphery of the site is designated as "greenbelt" due to both the presence of steep slopes (approximately 50%) and natural vegetation. A multi-family residential complex is potentially consistent with the residential designation. Likewise, it would be potentially compatible with the "greenbelt" designation, as no development is planned for that area, and, as density levels proposed for the remainder of the parcel have been reduced to conform to the Zoning Ordinance requirements (See Section 2 , Land Use, for more information) . Multi-family residential development on this. site is also generally consistent with Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies for residential development, such as IV.A, which calls for sound, viable neighborhoods to be created, IV.A. 1, which calls for housing densities and types to suit a variety of life circumstances and life styles; IV.A. 6. , which calls for a balance to be maintained between housing and available access, utilities and community facilities; IV.A.9 . , which calls for a variety of design/location patterns in housing; IV.B. 3 . , which calls for dwellings to take advantage of views and site character; IV.C. 3 . which calls for multi-family dwellings to be located near arterials; IV.C. 4/5 which calls for medium density multi-family housing to serve as a buffer between lower density residential uses and non- residential (commercial, public) uses; IV.C. 7 . which calls for basic amenities which are available to single-family residences to be available to residents of multi-family dwellings, and IV.C. 8, which calls for multi-family dwellings to be located near employment and shopping centers. Similarly, the proposed development is consistent with. Comprehensive Plans policies for Urban Design, which call for development to occur in a timely and logical progression (III .A) and with general goals for development in Southeast Renton, which call for multi-family uses in the area for which City Lights Apartments are proposed. 2 . Whether the proposed development conforms to Zoning Ordinance requirements which are applicable to residential uses on the subject parcel? The proposed development is permitted under the Zoning Ordinance Land Use designation of R-3 , Medium Density residential development which has been applied to this site. The development has been proposed to include 61 dwelling units (housing approximately 126 persons) on a 3 .3 acre Technical Advisory Commis e Staff Report City Lights Apartments Page 3 October 27, 1989 site, or 19 units per acre. The maximum density permitted on this lot would be 70 units, because approximately .5 acre of the parcel is a greenbelt area which is sloped at 50% and, therefore, is undevelopable. Staff determined, however, that 61 units would be the maximum desirable number based upon lot configuration, slope, access constraints, and other similar characteristics. The revised project plan appears to generally conform to criteria which must be addressed in conjunction with environmental review (See Environmental Elements Section below) and with the Site Plan Review Ordinance (4-738) . The proposed residential complex does generally meet development standards established for multi-family housing in the R-3 zone (e.g. height, bulk) , however, the applicant would need to obtain a variance to allow a front yard of 22 feet rather than the customary 30 feet (to allow the retention of a roadway easement on the western boundary of the property) . _ Similarly, it generally conforms with standards established in the Landscaping Ordinance (4-744) . The applicant has proposed that some of the access routes to and through the site be at a grade of greater than the customarily permitted eight (8) percent; a variance must be obtained from the Board of Public Works to permit those access routes. Otherwise, the proposed development does generally conform to requirements established in the Parking and Loading Ordinance (4-2204) . Some question is raised by public school system representatives concerning the capacity of the local public school system to accommodate the 15. school-aged children anticipated to live in this complex. (Note: While the proponent intends to design and market this complex to serve young professionals, rather than to families, regulations prohibit the type of tenant selection which would exclude children from the development) . 3 . Whether the proposed development is compatible with vicinity uses? Multi-family development would appear to be suitable on the subject parcel, which is surrounded to the west by existing multi-family residential uses and a single-family residential complex now under construction, to the north by multi-family residential units, to the south by a church, and to the east by two public schools. As noted previously, however, the proposed complex will need to be designed, and mitigation measures be required, in order to address on- site and off-site impacts from the project so that the development is compatible with adjacent uses. Of particular concern is the need to ensure that the nearby public. facilities (Fred Nelson School and Presbyterian Church) neither are impacted by nor impact the proposed City Lights complex. (ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS) 1. Whether the proponent has adequately identified and address environmental impacts anticipated to occur in conjunction with the proposed development? a) Housing Impacts: As noted previously the City's Comprehensive Plan and local marketing analyses call for an increase in multi-family residential development in the City of Renton. The site appears to be appropriately suited to accommodate the proposed 61 dwelling units and required/recommended amenities. Mitigation Measures: None required. Policy Nexus: Not applicable. Technical Advisory Commi e Staff Report City LightsApartments Page 4 October 27 , 1989 b) Land Use/Aesthetics Impacts: The project site poses several challenges for development, including its irregular configuration, steep terrain, and the presence of several easements which restrict location of structures and other improvements. Within the given constraints, the proponent has succeeded in planning attractive structures which are proposed to be constructed of durable materials (e.g. wood siding and pitched heavy-duty , composition roofing) . Structures are well-separated from one another spatially (a minimum distance of 40 feet between residential structures and a minimum distance of 20 feet between residential structures and the recreation building) and by terrain differential. (The northeast unit in Building #1 is located 20 feet from the north property line and the northern parking space east of that building is located approximately 15 .feet from the north property line -- this boundary area (which will be improved with landscaping, and, perhaps, with fencing) is considered to be acceptable under the Code, and is well-separated from the adjoining residential development by a 30 foot wide utilities easement and a 20 foot wide landscaped setback. An indoor active recreation center is provided, as well as an outdoor seating area and an active recreation area for children. Open and enclosed parking is provided which is architecturally integrated with the dwelling units (e.g. roofing style and materials) . Staff note that the greenbelt will be retained with natural vegetation, providing a unique amenity for residents. However, as a result of the proposed development some natural vegetation is slated to be removed from the portion of the site which is to be developed; this vegetation is to be replaced with structures and/or parking areas. New plantings are proposed to be included in this development; plans presented generally meet requirements established by the City's Landscaping Ordinance. Tree inventory/preservation plans are reviewed below (See Natural Environment) . Where desirable, modifications to the proposed plan will be required in conjunction with site plan review. To support the proposed development on the sloped terrain, roadways with a grade of greater. than 8% and rockeries/retention walls of up to 10 feet in height are being proposed. Permission for the . increased roadway slope must be obtained from the Board of Public Works. Rockeries which are proposed to be greater than four feet in height are subject to approval by a certified geological engineer, by the City's Public Works Department and the Building Division. In the absence of such approval, .retaining walls will be required -- rockeries are preferred, if their stability can be ensured, because further cutting into the sloped area will be required to support • retaining walls. Mitigation Measures: None are required for environmental determination. Note: At the time of site plan review, staff may recommend specific amenities (parking areas, recreation areas, service areas, lighting, signage) and open areas to ensure compliance with the Site Plan Review Ordinance and to protect compatibility of the proposed development with abutting uses. Approved landscaping plans, rockery/retention wall plans and roadway slope plans will be required at that time also. Policy Nexus: Not applicable. Technical Advisory Commit a Staff Report City Lights Apartments Page 5 October 27, 1989 c) Earth/Natural Environment Impacts: The proponent has provided a complete tree inventory and tree preservation plan indicating an intent to retain the vegetation in the existing steeply-sloped greenbelt and to maintain the vegetation located in this area. Stands of conifers will also be retained:on the portion of the land which is to be developed. This will result in the preservation of a significant portion of the natural environment. New landscaping will be added throughout the site and at the perimeters to further enhance the natural environment. The portion of the site that is to be developed will be balanced by the relocation of approximately 10, 000 cubic yards of soil excavated and filled from that site,; the grading plan will need to be approved by the Public Works and Building Departments, according to City regulations, to protect the site against erosion during construction or operation. The two sections of the site are proposed to be separated by rockeries; rockeries are proposed elsewhere on the property to protect the terrain from erosion. Mitigation Measures: That the applicant refrain from cutting any trees until the site plan, landscaping plan and tree plan for the proposed development is approved by the City. Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance 4-2822 ; WAC 197-11- 960 B. 1. d) Traffic Circulation Impacts: The development as proposed is anticipated to generate approximately 372 ADWVTE. In order to identify off-site circulation impacts and establish parameters for measures to mitigate these impacts, the applicant has provided information about traffic impacts for this project which will supplement an analysis recently completed for the project area in conjunction with a similar -- but smaller --. residential development in this vicinity. Based upon the combined information, some basic guidelines for mitigation have been delineated by the Traffic Engineering Division; the applicant has agreed, in principle, to contribute a fair share to regional improvements (e.g. signalization of the S.E. 31st Street/Benson Road intersection, increasing, the width of Benson Road) . The applicant has also agreed to provide required off-site improvements and to maintain a currently existing easement on the western boundary of the site to facilitate future roadway improvements. On-site traffic impacts are anticipated, by virtue of the fact that roadways are steeply graded, limiting both visibility and unimpeded travel. This impact is mitigated, in part, by the presence of two access points, by wide roadways, and by design of parking and service areas. On-site lighting and signage plans will need to be improved to more fully illuminate/define the circulation routes and parking areas on the site. Staff believe that pedestrian circulation plans need to be revised to better facilitate access to and through the site (e.g. sidewalks from Benson Road to the site, adjacent to roadways, linkage from Building #4, and linkage to recreation/service areas) . Mitigation Measures: 1) That the applicant be required to provide a traffic mitigation plan which includes off-site improvements adjacent to the site, the retention of the right-of-way easement on Benson Road, and a fair share contribution to regional improvements. This plan is subject to approval by the Traffic Engineering Division in advance of the issuance of site Technical Advisory Commi .e Staff Report City Lights Apartments Page 6 October 27, 1989 preparation/building permits; 2) That the applicant be required to provide improved pedestrian circulation plans, subject to approval by the Planning Division in conjunction with site plan review; and 3) That the applicant be required to provide on-site illumination and signage plans, subject to approval by the Planning Division in conjunction with site plan review. Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance 4-2822 ; WAC 197-11-960 B. 14 . e) Noise, ,light and glare Impacts: The proposed/recommended residential development is not anticipated to generate noise beyond that customarily anticipated from a multi-family residential development. Substantial separation between structures will serve. to limit noise. Some noise is anticipated, however, from activities undertaken in the recreation center. Noise would also be anticipated from outdoor recreation activities. Additionally, sound would be anticipated to occur to the site from the abutting roadway (Old Benson Road) and nearby public schools. Staff will recommend that insulation be required in residential and recreation structures to limit interior ambient levels to 45 dBA to mitigate noise impacts to the site. Light and glare is anticipated to be generated to the site from both vehicles traversing on-site roadways and adjacent Old Benson Road, due to terrain differential and steeply graded roads. Light may also be generated from on-site exterior lighting fixtures. Recommendations for landscaping, screening, and on-site lighting plans should serve to mitigate light and glare impacts. Mitigation Measures: 1) That the applicant be required to provide insulation to limit interior ambient noise in living units and indoor recreation areas to 45 dBA.. 2) That the applicant be required to provide a plan for screening at all boundaries of the site, utilizing six foot high standard wood fencing on the north, south and eastern boundaries, and wood fencing, rockeries or a brick/masonry wall on Benson Road to provide mitigation of light, glare and some noise from the abutting roadway and nearby land uses. This fencing provides site definition which is valuable for personal safety and crime prevention as well. (Note: Acoustically designed fencing was considered for the Benson Road boundary, but is not being suggested because terrain differential would limit the efficiency of this noise mitigation measure. ) Specific plans should be subject to approval by the Planning Division and the Public Works Department in conjunction with site plan review. Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance 4-2822 ; WAC 197-11-960 B.7 . f) Public Services and Utilities 1) Utility lines Impacts: Utility services are available to serve the site; lines may be required to be relocated and systems connection fees may be assessed. The proponent is seeking to develop over existing utilities easements. He is aware that a formal request to release such existing easements must be filed' and. that plans must be submitted for the relocation of utility lines within the easements. Public Works Department staff have indicated support, in principle, for release/relocation. Technical Advisory Commis e Staff Report City Lights Apartments Page 7 • October 27, 1989 Mitigation Measures: None are required in conjunction with environmental review. At the time of site plan review, the applicant shall be required to obtain necessary easement releases and approval of conceptual utility line relocation plans, subject to approval by the Utilities Engineering Division, with a recommendation that those plans be approved in advance of the issuance of site preparation/building permits. Policy Nexus: Not applicable. 2) Storm Drainage Impacts: Storm drainage management can be provided on this site, however, the steep terrain, the presence of an open drainage channel and the existence of storm drainage easements must be addressed by the applicant. The applicant has obtained approval to place structures on the storm drainage easements, and has obtained approval, in principle, for a plan to manage storm drainage throughout the site. A more specific plan, subject to the approval of the Public Works Department, will be required in advance of the issuance of site preparation/building permits. Mitigation Measures: 1) That the applicant be required to provide a plan for a storm drainage management system (including detention/retention, oil/water separation, and biofiltration) will be required to be provided, subject to approval by the Public Works Department. This plan shall be approved the Public Works Department, in advance of the issuance of site preparation/building permits. Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance 4-2822 ; WAC 197- 11-9601B. 1, B. 3 , B. 16. 3) Fire and Police Services Impacts: Fire Prevention Bureau and Police Department representatives indicate that adequate resources are available to provide the anticipated type/number of calls to the proposed development. Standard code based improvements, supplemented by an approved management plan and an extraordinary services bond, are expected to be sufficient to permit adequate service to the site. Improved exterior illumination and signage (to be recommended in conjunction with site plan review) is supported by the Fire and Police Departments to facilitate emergency services and to reduce criminal activity. Mitigation Measures: None are required in conjunction with environmental review. At the time of site plan review, staff will recommend that the applicant be required to provide a plan for improved exterior illumination and signage, a management plan and an extraordinary services management bond. Policy Nexus: Not applicable 4) Schools • Impacts: With 61 dwelling units, the proposed development is anticipated to generate a maximum of approximately 15 school- aged children. Because the development is designed to be oriented toward adults rather than toward families, it is possible that fewer than the expected number of children will reside here. School District officials report that the estimated number of children can be accommodated at nearby Tiffany Park Elementary Technical Advisory Commit. a Staff Report City Lights Apartments Page 8 October 27, 1989 School, Nelson Middle School (immediately adjacent to the site) and Lindbergh High School. Mitigation Measures: None required. Policy Nexus: Not applicable. 5) Recreation facilities Impacts: The proponent has provided an indoor recreation center including a spa, exercise room and lounge. The center includes an outdoor deck. There is also an outdoor seating area for adults, as well as a covered outdoor play area for children. Additionally, in conjunction with site plan review, staff will recommend provision of a covered, congregate area at the mail boxes (including seating, illumination, plantings, and a bulletin board) to enhance "neighborliness" on the site. The playfields at Fred Nelson School, immediately east of this site, also provide an excellent opportunity for recreation for residents of City Lights. School officials are willing to open their facilities to City Lights residents. There are concerns, however, raised by school representatives, City Lights representatives, and some City staff members, relating to the ability to maintain safety and security of persons and property on the City Lights parcel if there is open access to the School from this site. For example, Fred Nelson School personnel do not want children crossing Benson Avenue, which has a high volume of traffic, and shortcutting through City Lights to the school. There is also concern that children may "disappear" from school through City Lights during the school day. City Lights proponents are concerned that children travelling through the residential complex may be injured and/or may vandalize the property. A suggestion that a gate be provided which is locked, and accessed by keys held by residents -- if consistent use of this lock could be ensured, this plan would be viable, but there is a question as to whether it is possible to depend upon residents, particularly children, to adhere to the necessary .security rules. Mitigation Measures: Staff may require a contribution to off- site recreational development in the event that on-site amenities are deemed insufficient to mitigate recreational impacts to the community. Policy Nexus: . .Environmental Review Ordinance, 4-2822 ; WAC 197-11-960 B. 12 . ; Comprehensive Parks Plan. g. Construction Impacts 'Impacts: Grading, filling (of material excavated on the site) and construction on this site is anticipated to create noise impacts, dust and debris, and traffic impacts. Standard mitigation plans are considered to be generally adequate to address these issues. Erosion is considered to be asubstantial concern due to the steep terrain -- erosion control plans must be provided and construction activities which may result in erosion (e.g. grading, filling) 'must be confined to the dry season; any uncovered soil must be hydroseeded prior to the beginning of the rainy season. Mitigation Measures: That the applicant be required to provide a construction management plan including: a) an erosion control plan, including soils management, construction date restrictions (May 1st to September 1st, and a plan for hydroseeding any open areas on the site by September 15th; b) a plan for wheel-washing of construction trucks prior to departure from the site'; c) a plan for periodic watering down of the site to control dust; d) a plan for hauling hours and routes to control traffic impacts; e) a plan for construction hours to mitigate noise impacts; and f) a street Technical Advisory Commi 4e Staff Report City Lights Apartments Page '9 October 27, 1989 clean-up bond in the amount of $2000, 00. These plans are subject to approval by the Public Works Department, Fire Prevention Bureau, Police Department and Planning Division, prior to the issuance of site preparation permits. Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance 4-2822 ; WAC 197-11- 960 B. 1, B.7, B. 11, B. 14 . C. RECOMMENDATIONS: . That the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination of Non- Significance, Mitigated, with the following conditions: 1) That the applicant refrain from cutting any trees until the site plan, landscaping plan. and tree plan for the proposed development are approved by the , City' to mitigate impacts to the natural environment; 2) That the applicant be required to provide a traffic mitigation plan which includes off-site improvements adjacent to the site, the retention of the right-of-way easement on Benson Road, and a fair share contribution to regional improvements. This plan is subject to approval by the Traffic Engineering Division in advance of the issuance of site preparation/building permits; 3) That the applicant be required to provide insulation to limit interior ambient noise in living units and indoor recreation areas to 45 dBA; 4) That the applicant be required to provide a plan for screening at all boundaries of the site, utilizing six foot high standard wood fencing on the north, south and eastern boundaries, and wood fencing, rockeries or a brick/masonry wall on Benson Road to provide mitigation of light, : glare and some noise from the abutting roadway and nearby land uses, as well as to provide site definition which is valuable for personal safety and crime prevention. Specific plans should be subject to approval by the Planning Division and the Public Works Department in conjunction with site plan review. 5) That the applicant be required to provide a plan for a storm drainage management system (including detention/retention, oil/water separation, and biofiltration) will be required to be provided, subject to approval by the Public Works Department. This plan shall be approved by the Public Works Department, in advance of the issuance of site preparation/building permits. 6) That the applicant be required to provide a construction management plan including: a) an erosion control plan, accompanied by an agreement to confine construction activities which might result in erosion from May.. 1st to September 1st, and a plan to hydroseed permeable areas on the site by September 15th; b) a plan for wheel-washing of construction trucks prior to departure from the site; c) a plan for periodic watering down of the site to control dust; d) a plan for hauling hours and routes to control traffic impacts; e) a plan for construction hours to mitigate noise impacts;' and f) a street clean-up bond in the amount of $2000, 00. These plans are subject to approval by the Public Works Department, Fire Prevention Bureau, Police Department and Planning Division, prior to the issuance of site preparation permits. Note #1: Staff may require a contribution to off-site recreational development in the event that on-site amenities are deemed insufficient to mitigate recreational impacts to the community. Technical Advisory Commit a Staff Report City Lights Apartments Page 10 October 27, 1989 -Note #2 : At the time of site plan. approval, ' improvements are likely to be recommended, including, but not limited to, plans for exterior illumination, signage, pedestrian circulation, on-site amenities (congregate areas) , rockeries and retention walls, utilities easements and service plans, extraordinary services bonding, and a management plan. D. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS: Various City departments reviewed and commented upon the originally submitted project in August, 1989 ; revised plans were submitted to Traffic Engineering, Storm Water Engineering, Design Engineering, Utilities Engineering, Parks Department, Building and Planning Divisions. - Original and revised comments are as follows: LAND USE COMMENTS Police Department:- Original Land Use: Approved with conditions. 1) Installation of tot lot area for toddlers. 2) Installation of Lighting within stairwell, particularly ground level on buildings 4 and 5 (those with garages) . 3) Approved numbering system. Revised: Tot lot and lighting is planned. Approved numbering system will be necessary. Fire Prevention Bureau: Land Use: Approved with conditions. Any development and/or construction shall comply with current Fire and Building Codes and Ordinances. A second means of approved access is required. Fire Department access road/lanes shall be paved minimum width 20' ; minimum height 13 '6" . Preliminary fire flow calculations show a fire flow of 3250 is required. 3 hydrants with a minimum flow of 1000 gpm each is required. Primary hydrant is required to be within 150 feet of the structure. Secondary hydrants are required to be within 300 feet of the structure. An approved automatic sprinkler system is required to protect the total structure. All fire department access roads are to be paved and installed prior to construction. All fire hydrants are required to be installed an approved prior to construction. Revised: No new comments. solicited. Design Engineering: Land Use: Not approved. 1) Temporary erosion control and storm drainage will be critical with this project. 2) Roadway grades exceeding 8% require approval from Board. of Public Works. 3) Possible conflict with rockery wall being set in 20' util/road easement adj . to Benson Rd. 4) Full offsite imp. required on Benson Rd. This Department cannot approve preliminary plans. Revised: Verbal conditional approval, with full approval to be based upon suitable erosion control system, permit from Board of Public Works for road Technical Advisory Commit _ ? Staff Report City Lights Apartments Page 11 October 27, 1989 • grading, and off-site improvements to be provided on Benson Road. Proposed rockeries have been scaled down to a maximum of ten feet, however, all rockeries above four feet will require approval by City and by a certified engineer for the project. Traffic Engineering: Land Use: Approved with conditions. 1) The applicant perform a TIA (they must contact us for the details) . 2) Propose some measures to mitigate their impact on the intersection of Benson Road & S.E. 31st St. and the need for a signal at that location. 3) Widen their side of Benson Road in accordance with the attached plan. 4) Dedicate 8' of RDW and 12 ' of utility easement along the front of their property. 5) Participate monetarily in the construction of the streetlighting on the opposite side of Benson Road. 6) Underground their utilities. 7) Construct their driveways in accordance with City Standards (See corrections on the Plans) . . Revised: (See attached letter, dated 8/16/89 from Richard Nordon) . Utility Engineering: Land Use: Not approved. All requests for the release of City easements must follow process and procedure set by City. Water and sewer system development charge - $24 , 500. Separate water and sewer plans required. Approved fire hydrant locations by Fire Dept. Fire flow analysis may be required. Existing sanitary sewer line must be relocated. Require plans for developers extensions of existing utilities per Renton standards. Revised: Verbal comments indicating that plans for release of easements and relocation of utility lines are likely to be granted for this project. Storm Water Utility: Not approved. 1) Open drainage channel needs to be left open unless it is shown that such channel presents an erosion problem. 2) A temporary erosion control plan needs to be provided and work will be performed within a May 1st through September 1st construction window. 3) Detention system should be located outside of the roadway easement. 4) ,Detention will be based upon a 25 year storm with a 5 year release rate. Existing detention will need to be accounted for in design. 5) A baffled oil/water separator will be required. A biofiltration swale should be incorporated into the design. Revised: Project approved, subject to above conditions #2 - #5. Open drainage channel may be closed. Plans for rerouting intermittent swale are in Technical Advisory Commi se Staff Report City Lights Apartments Page 12 October 27, 1989 process. (See September 7 letter attached) . Parks and Recreation: Land Use: Not approved. Need more information. Revised: Not received as of 10/26/89) Building Division: Land Use: Not approved. 1) Rockeries not appropriate as retaining walls. 2) Buildings are over easements. Piping may not be proper for under buildings. 3) No building code check done. Revised: Rockeries will need engineering approval. Building location approved, pending Public Works approval. Current Planning Division: Land Use: 1) Preservation of additional trees on site should be required. 2) Additional coniferous tree planting should be done along the north and south sides for additional buffering. 3) Pedestrian walkways should connect to sidewalk along Benson Road. 4) Picnic tables and seating areas would be desirable around the complex. 5) Driveway grades exceeds 8% on the site and can only exceed this by approval from the Board of Adjustment. 6) Landscaping to north is not even to min. 5' width by parking lot. 7) Need detail of project sign to approve. 8) Rockeries and retaining walls should be softened with vegetation. 9) Recommend smaller, pedestrian scale lighting standards around walkways and entrances to buildings. Revised: 1) Are bockemies acceptable? Still very high up to 10' . 2) A walkway should be provided from Benson Road to the complex. Perhaps extending sidewalk along south side of Recreation Center. 3) The project sign requires a 10' setback along Benson Rd. (2' provided?) . 4) Need to define limits of 6' high screening fence. 5) Will 3rd floor units take advantage of cathedral ceilings? 6) South parking stall adjacent Bldg. #4 seems rather close -- can it be pulled back and landscaping increased between it and the building? Long Range Planning: Land Use: Request for more information. Proposed project may leave substantial impacts on traffic, storm drainage system, vegetation, aesthetics, and parks and recreation facilities. The proposed density is too high for the area. The site is rather hilly and steep (steepest slope on the site is about 40%) . Cut and fill will be utilized for the development. This would change' the material land form and features of the site ; it may create significant erosion problems. The applicant should prepare an expanded Technical Advisory Commit__e Staff Report City Lights Apartments Page 13 October 27, 1989 initial study to address the impacts, particularly, the cumulative impacts on the areas mentioned above. ENVIRONMENTAL COMMENTS Police Department: Probable minor impact - public services. There is no indication of a "tot lot" or other toddler play area. There should be. Unit number will need to be approved by police. Lighting will need to be installed within stair well. Vehicle access is poor to this location. Fire Prevention Bureau: Probable minor impact - public services. Design Engineering: Probable minor impact - transportation and utilities. All requests for the release of City easements must follow process and procedure set by City. Water and sewer system development charge - $24 , 500. Separate water and sewer plans required. Approved fire hydrant locations by Fire Dept. Fire flow analysis may be required. Existing sanitary sewer line must be relocated. Require plans for developers extensions of existing utilities per Renton standards. Traffic Engineering: Probable minor impact - transportation. Approved subject to the following conditions: 1) The applicant perform a TIA (they must contact us for the details) . 2) Propose some measures to mitigate their impact on the intersection of Benson Road & S.E. 31st St. and the need for a signal at that location. 3) Widen their side of Benson Road in accordance with the attached plan. . 4) Dedicate 8' of RDW and 12 ' of utility easement along the front of their property. 5) Participate monetarily in the construction of the streetlighting on the opposite side of Benson Road. 6) Underground their utilities. Revised: (See attached letter, dated 8/16/89 from Richard Nordon) . Utility Engineering: Probable minor impact - utilities. 1) Existing sanitary sewer line for Fred Nelson School must be relocated. 2) Require watermain extension and sewer extension. 3) Require plans for above extensions per City's standards for development extension. 4) Require release of easements by City Council, through easement vacation procedures. Storm Water_ Utilities: Probable minor impact - water. 1) .Open drainage channel needs to be left open unless it is shown that such channel presents an 'erosion problem. 2) A temporary erosion control plan needs to be provided and work will be performed within a May 1st through September 1st Technical Advisory Commi ?e Staff Report City Lights Apartments Page 14 October 27, 1989 construction window. 3) Detention system should be located outside of the roadway easement. 4) Detention will be based upon a 25 year storm with a 5 year release rate. Existing detention will need to be accounted for in design. 5) A baffled oil/water separator will be required. A biofiltration swale should be incorporated into the design. Revised: Project approved, subject to above conditions #2 - #5. Open drainage channel may be closed. Plans for rerouting intermittent swale are in process. (See September 7 letter attached) . Parks and Recreation: More information necessary. In addition to on-site recreational impacts. This action will increase the City's need for park land by 1. 47 acres (Park Comprehensive Plan standards) . What is the proposed mitigation of this impact? Building Division: Probable minor impact - housing. Current Planning Division: 1) A poor job has been done on preserving existing native trees on the site, especially to the north, south, and west sides. 2) Note: Rockeries appear too high. Civil drawing illustrates rockery as high as 15 feet. 3) Note: buildings are constructed over storm drainage and sanitary sewer easements. Revised: 1) Are bockemies acceptable? Still very high up to 10' . 2) A walkway should be provided from Benson Road to the complex. Perhaps extending sidewalk along south side of Recreation Center. 3) The project sign requires a 10' setback along Benson Rd. (2 ' provided?) . 4) Need to define limits of 6' high screening fence. 5) Will 3rd floor units take advantage of cathedral ceilings? 6) South parking ' stall adjacent Bldg. #4 seems rather close -- can it be pulled back and landscaping increased between it and the building? Long Range Planning: Request for more information. Proposed project may leave substantial impacts on traffic, storm drainage system, vegetation, aesthetics, and parks and recreation facilities. The proposed density is too high for the area. The site is rather hilly and steep (steepest slope on the site is about 40%) . Cut and fill will be utilized for the development. This would change the material land form and features of the site ; it may create significant erosion problems. The applicant should prepare an expanded 'initial study to address the impacts, particularly, the cumulative impacts on the areas mentioned above. Technical Advisory Commi ae Staff Report City Lights Apartments Page 15 October 27, 1989 Revised: Applicant has reduced density and addressed storm drainage/erosion concerns. 40 Au, CITY OF RENTON "LL 5 • PUBLIC WORkk5 DEPARTMENT - Earl Clymer, Mayor Traffic Engineering Division August 16, 1989 • Mr. John Miller President, North Bay. 633 North Mildred, Suite g Tacoma,WA 98406 RE: CITY LIGHTS APARTMENTS 2500 Block of Benson Road ECF; - 087 - 89 Dear Mr. Miller: I would like to take this moment to reemphasize the • position of the Transportation Services Division concerning your project and any new development that has an impact concerning the intersection of Benson Road & SE 31st Street. This intersection presently warrants a traffic signal to alleviate the congestion and delay that the public is experiencing. Any new development utilizing this intersection will have a negative impact upon the environment unless measures are taken to change these conditions. The options that are open as the City sees them are to approve but delay new development until the City can fund a new signal, or new development could contribute a reasonable fee towards the construction of the required signal. Following our meeting of August 7, 1989, I conducted an estimate of the •construction costs to design and build a traffic signal at the intersection of Benson Road & SE 31st Street. If you find the expenses listed on the attached estimate to be in line with your own experience in' construction, then this estimate could be agreed upon to serve as the basis for any SEPA traffic mitigation measures for your project. I think a reasonable traffic mitigation fee could be tied to the percentage of new PM peak traffic versus total , existing PM peak traffic that enters the intersection would represent the amount of mitigation required by the City. The cost of the new signal according • to my estimate would be $114, 352' and to use Benson Place Apartments as an example, along with the information supplied by the study conducted by The Transpo Group, Inc. , the mitigation fee would be: Benson Place Apt. PM Peak 14 vehicles Existing Traffic PM Peak 1028 vehicles 14 / 1028 = .1. 36% of $114, 352 or $1557.32 • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2620 Facsimile (206) 235-2513 • Mr. John Miller . August 16, 1989 page 2 . . This percentage is slightly higher than the study by Transpo, but provides the city with a constant to check every new project (ie. .1028 existing vehicles) . These funds would be initially used towards the design of the signal . (Phase I) , when sufficient funds are collected, and then subsequent development would be used to pay for the construction of the signal (Phase II) . As in all mitigation fees, if the public cannot spend the funds towards this agreed upon project within a five-year period, then the funds would, be returned to the developer. If yoU . find the information proposed in this letter to your understanding, then please signify by writing to Ms. Lenora Blauman, Current Planning Division, with your proposed mitigation fee. • As in all new development, if you can find some other means of not having an impact on the above mentioned . intersection, we are ready to review any proposal yo1 might have. Respectfully, Richard H. Nordon Ass't Transportation Planning Engr. Attachment cc: Gary Norris, Trans. Systems Manager Clint Morgan, Traffic Specialist --Lenora Blauman, Senior Planner John Nason John Nason Architect Benson Road & SE 31st Street File • INTERSECTION SIGNALIZATION ESTIMATE for Benson Road & SE 31st Street 1. Saw Cutting 545 if $7, 538 2 . Trenching & Backfill 1415 if $6,562 3 . Intersection Patching 16. tons $900 4 . Conduit (all Sizes) 4145 if $10, 656 5. Wire (all sizes) 5, 378 if $2, 440 6. Intersection Lighting . 9 loc. $15,938 System 7 . Vehicle Detectors 15 loops $11, 099 8. Pedestrian Crossing ' 4 loc. $6,285 System 9 . Signal Heads & 8 heads $8, 688 Installation 10. Traf. Sig. Poles & 3 ea. $10, 625 Installation 11. Opticom System 1 ea. $4 ,480 12 . Traffic Sig. Controller, 1 ea. $10, 925 Cabinet & Install. 13 . Pavement Markings lump sum $7,538 14. Traffic Control lump sum $1, 000 SUBTOTAL $98, 156 16. 5% Engr. & Inspection $16, 196 TOTAL $114,352 All the prices, from above were derived from bids received on the December 2, 1987 bid opening on the SW Sunset Blvd. project with an increase of approximately 4 . 5% to reflect inflation. � � . • • • • M4713i TO 10.X16TINEi Slo'W't7i' fd°''D''LS` . � trx ms OF r • 5'6Nc. I.WJ( aAJ • / . rtr■irrrr _ rani■r■rirrarrira■■ttiu> ■tits pat ■rajj1tsttiziiij uluiilAjjjlttiiiiiiijiiiiiii irnrta id `_. . - - _ • }ir ,$0NSv1i ,5, . �., • 1 i. isisiissrs ss■■■issuitsi■■:it�tt/iftltas■a■1Rtfl■rirta*i'iilrtatriff*TlaaiiiiiiRl.ii)ii'Rthnniitin�aiaiiaiit /w0' 1Ta' 131' TO 0 • t uk T v�. s. • twit,+ of rA t - -4 Tam—' DOWN PM • S'(VAC. WUST—I'44- _ TO 4-LA/4/S. .4.4 gi /_,...„) Al NK 0� f� -- . . mismailmiiimiiaamis ■■■ ■ii■i■■sii■ir■isi■■■i■■i■■■■Qr■■■rta■■i■■t■■■■■i■■i■■■ atiiii■niiiiiii ■iiiiiii■■■asI■ir'ii■■■■■■■■rn ,_.___....... t _ • _ Off. llirarirairi,Yu■i■■i■ ■ir lii■■■rf■itari■a■■■■'i■i■a■r■Ira■■aaaiaaaa■ra■rasaasilkiatartaaaaiiiiiiiiaa aiiiiita iii'' ' at�olio" • \—-- . le 1:....0... ioN\ 6141 .r • WILK • VI �� T�KAL " . , • a-Lamm Sr.G-rtoF( • -a 8 1. s' • (47' rP. I4 ( Iifrn-1� • . . AMA TO J,ri,n..o. CE.vE1 DP BY . cm( L14HTS APT. • • • V I GTDiz1,4 FI I LLS ��1— • tt- LANE SEC-Clbt$ • - ZZO'min. d 11 r r• . tt i ' • ,.. ...... Vists6 . . i .m m . , illurrIIIMlirrrilr uijirrrrUU1yjrrrrirl1rrir1,titrl.1irr4irr0rrrrijiritrrrrrriririii. itiiii'`W V lli8th . . ._ • . . _ �- . Mlmilrrrrritillrrrririrfiltrriiri ilrirrtrlimrnrrriiiitrtitsffilTivimalThirrirrtftiliriiiiiiiAriiiiifitltii/ I . I \ Zb5' ten_ . . . \ OM • . 'CpNc,. WALK 5—L4NL S6c11ONS • • ' ...'-----------------C q? . ■■rvvvv vivvvvvrvmrvvvvvrrrvivirmirrsmrnrsromilimrr;;r • • • • rrrrrrrrrr1rrrrrrtirrirrrirrrrrirrrrrrrrririirrrrrrrrrrtrr - • 4-LAN E3 3LL71bM -r0 ott1N c'P !t31Y U N E r • OP Vk 1b LA HILLS 7.1 ► . r AlE.NT L9 ' t r • mw • --LANE St5CrlON CITY OF RENTON • MEMORANDUM DATE: September. 7, 1989 TO: • Lenore Blauman, Seniore� Planner FROM: Kim Scattarella, S SCm Water Utility Engineer SUBJECT: CITY LIGHTS APTS. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW • Based upon additional information submitted to us by Pacific Engineering Company, our recommendations for storm water drainage have been modified to include the following; 1) Based upon the soils report and study performed by Earth Consultants, it has been determined to allow the intermittent swale to be rerouted by the proposed storm drainage system. The currently existing drainage course will be backfilled according to the soils report, which is enclosed. 2) The detention pipe was relocated, and after meeting with John Ralston, Traffic Engineering, it is recommended to move the proposed swale back to at least three feet away from the edge of the proposed sidewalk. The other prescribed conditions set by Storm Water Utility were noted, and should be addressed in the next environmental review resubmittal. CITYLTS/KDS:If Enclosure cc: Chuck Price 6 • t` -' . :: •s: COMMDNiT.Y DEVELOPMENT:;DEPARTMENT:.>:»; ?; >:::< >:>::::.::::::::::: :::::::::: : ; ;::>:.::.:: .: <::>: :>:>;::•. ENVIRONMENTAL. 12EVIEW::.COMMITTEE:.;';::::;:;::>:::>:.:: :;;>:::::»:::::::::<:::::' ;:::::::::>::::;: :.. ::::: TIFF REPORT .. `•Nove:. mbe i .i,7.,.�tr.. 'r .,.t p. f.r•;: �.' 'V� i...ii�..w.e"..Y ,A, . Y r l 4,� .1 . • , .• ,A P p- LiCAN.T; ::;;:: : :: :;:` : ' ::..'. :.. North Bay: Development:.,.Corpora.tori::>::: ::::::: :: : :;i . •: :: Melvin Easter,,,,';<Johnson': $•raund D:esi n.»::::.:..:.:.::: .Gro .u : • • PROJECT City.'Lights :Apartments:::'< :< .....: :: i::: .: : :: ; :,;;: . • • :•.... .ENVI ON TAL OHEC LfSr: ECF• SA=0878 . DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Applicant seeks site plan approval:.:::for: al..• 61 unit apartment complex. .to' be:;':located '` on a vacant 3 . 3 acre R-3 , 'Mult:i:•- i Famly • . Residential , zoned. parcel: ... .. Note-c'::: . Density level has been ad]usted.;:forr .. greenbelt aea ocated:.on .;thie::s:it :e: r l ) LOCATION OF' . PROPOSAL! East side ofenson.::Road::betwee• n_ Puget;.:• :;::: Drive and: South 26th Street:::::`across:;:;:from . .>: : Hill'. ..... :.. :... .. Victoria s.<apartment>::complex: ;::< :`>": '... : I` ISSUES : Housing, Land Use, Natural Environment, Earth, Traffic, Noise, Light, Glare, Public Service RECOMMENDATIONS : Determination of Non-Significance- . Mitigated (conditions listed on Page' 2) .• • • l_ \• - 1 '111 I "'v.. ..'.0—--0 \ • . ' .'. f 1:-,-",..z.: ... -). r"Ij.` "11-,•-!21, • _ ______--------•_____ . i,,, • • U i - •l•i 'Ii it-j ] lill I1'/ ECf OITE f -,..: • 1-'-mot- r / / L ,,. '''-''-_'--'-'I...' I- , ��/ . .I. � �t .,„ . 1...:(2, \ (4.,.1 . . . f„:"1-41 . . • 1_ �. Ic‹.—) � U f,/ J ' ill` ,l �\. --- Enyironmental Review Com ..tee. Staff Report City 4A:ghts Apartments Page 2 November 1, 1989 04:2>:::::<::i:;::::::'.::;:; <::::<:'2:::>.::.>.:i::}:i :::;•r,:t:>::>:::<'::?::::»:::::i::::::::>::<::_::::<::<<isstle Detrmihat'io1T::`:Of:s non--: ::: <::::<::i:<::::: :;:`;:>::>:z::ii:: • 1)- That the applicant refrain from cutting any trees until the site plan (including the landscaping plan and tree plan) for the proposed development is • approved by the City to mitigate impacts to the natural environment; 2) That the applicant be required to provide a traffic mitigation plan which includes off-site improvements adjacent to the site, the retention of the right- of-way easement on Benson Road, and a fair share contribution to regional improvements (including, but not limited to signalization. of the Benson Road/S.E. 31st Street intersection) . This plan is subject to approval by the Traffic Engineering Division in advance of the issuance of site preparation/building permits; '3) •That the applicant be required to provide insulation to limit interior` ambient noise in living units and indoor • recreation areas to 45 dBA; 4) That the applicant be required to provide a plan for screening at all boundaries of the site, utilizing six foot high standard wood fencing on the north, south and eastern boundaries, and wood fencing, rockeries or .a brick/masonry wall on Benson Road to 'provide mitigation of light, glare and some noise from the abutting roadway and nearby land uses; as well as to provide site definition which is valuable for • . personal safety and crime prevention. Specific plans should be subject to approval by the Planning Division and the Public Works Department in conjunction with site plan review. 5) That the applicant be required to provide a plan for a storm drainage management system (including 25 year storage/5 year- release plans [with detention/retention] , oil/water separation, and biofiltration) will be required to be provided, subject to approval by the Public Works Department, in advance of the issuance of site preparation/building permits. 6) That the applicant be required to provide a construction management plan including: a) an erosion control plan, • accompanied by an agreement to confine • construction activities which might result in erosion to the period from May 1st to September 1st, and a plan to Environmental Review Con :tee Staff Report. City Lights Apartments Page 3 November 1, 1989 • hydroseed permeable areas on the site by September 15th; b) a plan for wheel- washing of construction trucks prior to departure from..the site; c) a plan for periodic watering down of the site to control dust; d) a plan for hauling hours and routes to control traffic impacts; e) a plan for construction hours to mitigate noise impacts; and f) a street clean-up bond in the amount of $2 , 000. 00. These plans are subject to approval by the Public Works Department, Fire Prevention Bureau, Police Department and Planning Division, prior • to the issuance of site preparation . permits. • 7. That the applicant be required to provide a fee of $10, 675. 00 ($175. 00 x 61 units) to mitigate off-site recreation impacts. Note #1: At the time of site plan approval, the following recommendations are likely to be made, including, but not limited to requests for: 1) construction of fire equipment access links to structures; 2) changes to landscaping to provide consistency in plantings throughout the site; '3) changes to location of plantings to ensure adequate sight-distance for vehicle/pedestrian traffic; 4) landscaping maintenance bond; 5) fencing for the children's play area; 6) plans for improved exterior illumination; 7) plans for improved signage; 8) plans for pedestrian linkage to Benson Road; 9) revisions to parking plan to increase safety of ingress/egress to parking spaces on the south side of the north driveway to the site; 10) addition of on- site amenities (congregate areas) ; 11) approved plans for rockeries and/or retention walls (heights, materials, setbacks, etc. ) ; 12) approved plans for relocation of utilities easements and for service systems; 13) extraordinary services bonding; and 14) a management operations plan. • 1:. Whetherthe;.l5roponehthas::::;:ade atel: ::;;::. :> :.>:::.:;:.: :. . .:.:iaentifled< arid : address.ed::<:environmenta• l::: ,im is c a t lclp e <a n• a•tdA :::o o ccurl con 7 unction .faith v a) Housing 'Impacts: As noted previously the City's Comprehensive Plan and local marketing analyses call for an increase in multi- family residential development in the City of Renton. The site appears to be appropriately suited to accommodate the • proposed 61 dwelling units and required/recommended amenities. Mitigation Measures: None required. Policy Nexus: Not applicable. b) Land Use/Aesthetics • • Impacts: The project site poses several challenges for development, including its irregular configuration, steep terrain, and the presence of several • Enyironmental Review Com :tee Staff Report City Lights Apartments Page 4 November 1, 1989 easements which restrict location of structures and other improvements. Within the given constraints, the proponent has succeeded in planning attractive structures which are proposed to be constructed of durable materials (e.g. wood siding and pitched heavy-duty composition roofing) . Structures are well-separated from one another spatially (a minimum distance of 40 feet between residential structures and a minimum distance of 20 feet between residential structures and the recreation building) and by terrain differential. (The northeast unit in Building #1 is located 20 feet from the north property line and the northern parking space east of that building is located approximately 15 feet from the north property line -- this boundary area (which will be improved with landscaping and with fencing) is considered to be acceptable under the Code, and is well-separated from the adjoining residential development by a 30 foot wide utilities easement and a 20 foot wide landscaped setback. An indoor active recreation center is provided for adults and children, as well as an outdoor seating area. Open and enclosed parking is provided which is architecturally integrated with the dwelling units (e.g. roofing style and materials) . Staff note that the greenbelt will be retained with natural vegetation, providing a unique amenity for residents. However, as a result of the proposed development some natural vegetation is slated to be removed from the portion of the site which is to be developed; this vegetation is to be replaced with structures and/or parking areas, enhanced by landscaping. New plantings are proposed to be included throughout the site for this development; plans presented generally meet requirements established by the City's Landscaping Ordinance. Tree inventory/preservation plans are reviewed below (See Natural Environment) . Where desirable, modifications ,to the proposed plan will be required in conjunction with site • plan review. To accommodate the development on this sloped terrain, the complex is proposed to include some portions of roadways with a grade of greater than 8% (up to 15%) and rockeries/retention walls of up to 10 feet in height. Permission for the increased roadway slope must be obtained from the Board of Public Works. Rockeries which are proposed to be Environmental Review Com :tee Staff Report. pity Lights Apartments Page 5 November 1, 1989. greater than four feet in height are subject to approval by a certified geological engineer, by the City's Public Works Department and the Building Division. In the absence of such approval, retaining walls will be required -- rockeries are preferred, if their stability can be ensured, because further cutting into the sloped area will be required to support retaining walls. Mitigation Measures: None are required for environmental determination. Note: At the time of site plan review, staff may recommend specific amenities (parking areas, recreation areas, service areas, lighting, signage) to ensure compliance with the Site Plan Review Ordinance and to protect compatibility of the proposed development with abutting uses. Approved landscaping plans, rockery/retention wall plans and roadway slope plans will be required at that time also. Policy Nexus: Not applicable. c) Earth/Natural Environment Impacts: The proponent has provided a complete tree inventory and tree preservation plan indicating an intent to retain and maintain the vegetation in the existing steeply-sloped greenbelt. Stands of conifers will also be retained on the portion of the land which is to be developed. This will result in the preservation of a significant portion of the natural environment. New landscaping will be added throughout the site and at the perimeters to further enhance the natural environment. The portion of the site that is to be developed will be balanced by the relocation of approximately 10, 000 cubic yards of soil excavated and filled from that site; the grading plan will need to be approved by the Public Works and Building Departments, according to City regulations, to protect the site against erosion during construction or operation. The two sections of the site are proposed to be separated by rockeries; rockeries are proposed elsewhere on the property to protect the terrain from erosion. Mitigation' Measures: That the applicant refrain from cutting any trees until the site plan, landscaping plan and tree plan for the proposed development is approved by the City. Environmental Review Com :tee Staff Report City Lights Apartments Page 6 November 1, 1989 Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance 4-2822 ; WAC 197-11-960 B. 1. d) Traffic Circulation Impacts: The development as proposed is anticipated to generate approximately 372 ADWVTE. In order to identify off- site circulation impacts and establish parameters for measures to mitigate these impacts, the applicant has provided information about traffic impacts for this project which will supplement an analysis recently completed for the project area in conjunction with a similar -- but smaller -- residential development in this vicinity. Based upon the combined information, some basic guidelines for mitigation have been delineated by the Traffic Engineering Division; the applicant has agreed, in principle, to contribute a fair share to regional improvements (e.g. signalization of the S.E. 31st Street/Benson Road intersection, increasing the width of Benson Road) . The applicant has also agreed to provide required off-site improvements and to maintain a currently existing easement on the western boundary of the site to facilitate future roadway improvements. On-site traffic impacts are anticipated, by virtue of the fact that roadways are steeply graded, limiting both visibility and unimpeded travel. This impact is mitigated, in part, by the presence of two access points, by wide roadways, and by design of parking and service areas. On-site lighting and signage plans and selection of plantings at driveway entries will need to be improved to more fully illuminate/define the circulation routes and parking areas on the site. Staff believe that pedestrian circulation plans need to be revised to better facilitate access to and through the site (e.g. sidewalks from Benson Road to the site, adjacent to roadways, linkage from Building #4, and linkage to recreation/service areas) . Mitigation Measures: 1) That the applicant be required to provide a traffic mitigation plan which includes off-site improvements adjacent to the site, the retention of the right-of-way easement on Benson Road, and a fair share contribution to regional improvements. This plan is subject to approval by the Traffic Engineering Division in advance of the issuance of site preparation/building permits; 2) That the applicant be required to provide improved pedestrian circulation plans, subject to approval by the Planning Division in conjunction with Environmental Review Con :tee Staff Report City Lights Apartments Page 7 November 1, 1989 site plan review; 3) That the applicant be required to provide on-site illumination and signage plans, subject to approval by the Planning Division in conjunction with site plan review; and 4) That the applicant be required to design the landscaping plan so that the Benson Road corridor is fully visible from the site. . Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance 4-2822 ; WAC 197-11-960 B. 14 . e) Noise, light and glare Impacts: The proposed/recommended residential development is not anticipated to generate noise beyond that customarily anticipated from a multi-family residential development. Substantial separation between structures will serve to limit noise. Some noise is anticipated, however, from activities undertaken in the recreation center. Noise would also be anticipated from outdoor recreation activities. Additionally, sound would be anticipated • to occur to the site from the abutting roadway (Old Benson Road) and nearby public schools. Staff will recommend that insulation be required in residential and recreation structures to limit interior ambient levels to 45 dBA to mitigate noise impacts to the site. Light and glare is anticipated to be generated to the site from both vehicles traversing on-site roadways and adjacent Old Benson Road, due to terrain differential and steeply graded roads. Light may also be generated from on-site exterior lighting fixtures. Recommendations for landscaping, screening, and on-site lighting plans should serve to mitigate light and glare impacts. Mitigation Measures: 1) That the applicant be required to provide insulation to limit interior ambient noise in living units and indoor recreation areas to 45 dBA. 2) That the applicant be required to provide a plan for screening at all boundaries of the site, utilizing six foot high standard wood fencing on the north, south and eastern boundaries, and wood fencing, rockeries or a brick/masonry wall on Benson Road to provide mitigation of light, glare and some noise from the abutting roadway and nearby land uses. This fencing provides site definition which is valuable for personal safety • and crime prevention as well. (Note: Acoustically designed fencing was considered for the Benson Road boundary, but is not being suggested because terrain differential would limit the • Environmental Review Con :tee Staff Report City Lights Apartments Page 8 November 1, 1989 efficiency of this noise mitigation measure. ) Specific plans should be subject to approval by the Planning Division and. the Public Works Department in conjunction with site plan review. Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance 4-2822 ; WAC 197-11-960 B.7. f) Public Services and Utilities 1) Utility lines Impacts: Utility services are available to serve the site; lines may be required to be relocated and systems connection fees may be assessed. The proponent is seeking to develop over existing utilities easements. He is aware that a formal request to release such existing easements must be filed and that plans, must be submitted for the. relocation of utility lines within the easements. Public Works Department staff have indicated support, in principle, for release/relocation. Mitigation Measures: None are required in conjunction with environmental review. At the time of site plan review, the applicant shall be required to obtain necessary easement releases and approval of conceptual utility line relocation plans, subject to approval by the Utilities Engineering Division, with a recommendation that those plans be approved in advance of the issuance of site preparation/building permits. • Policy Nexus: Not applicable. 2) Storm Drainage Impacts: Storm drainage management can be provided on this site, however, the steep terrain, the presence of an open drainage channel and the existence of storm drainage easements must be addressed by the applicant. The applicant has obtained approval to place structures on the storm drainage easements, and has obtained approval, in principle, for plan to manage storm drainage throughout the site. A more specific plan, subject to the approval of the Public Works Department, will be required in advance of the issuance of site preparation/building permits. Mitigation Measures: 1) That the applicant be required to provide a plan for a storm drainage management system (including detention/retention, oil/water separation, and biofiltration) will be required to be provided, subject to approval by the Public Works Environmental Review Con :tee Staff Report City Lights Apartments Page 9 November 1, 1989 Department. This plan shall be approved the Public Works Department, in advance of the issuance of site preparation/building permits. Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance 4-2822 ; WAC 197-11-960`B. 1, B. 3 , B. 16. 3) Fire and Police Services Impacts: Fire Prevention Bureau and Police Department representatives indicate that adequate resources are available to provide the anticipated type/number of calls to the proposed development. Standard code based improvements, supplemented by an approved management plan and an extraordinary services bond, are expected to be sufficient to permit adequate service to the site. At the time of site plan review, the applicant will be required to make minor modifications to the parking area on the east side of the site to provide access to structures for fire equipment. Improved exterior illumination and signage (also to be recommended in conjunction with site plan review) is supported by the Fire and Police Departments to facilitate emergency services and to reduce criminal activity. Mitigation Measures: None are required in conjunction with environmental review. At the time of site plan review, staff will recommend that the applicant be required to provide a plan for improved access for fire equipment, improved exterior illumination and signage, a management plan and an extraordinary services management bond. Policy Nexus: Not applicable 4) Schools Impacts: With 61 dwelling units, the proposed development is anticipated to generate a maximum of approximately 15 school-aged children. Because the development is designed to be oriented toward adults rather than toward families, it is possible that fewer than the expected number of children will reside here. School District officials report that the estimated number of children can be accommodated at nearby Tiffany Park Elementary School, Nelson Middle School (immediately adjacent to the site) and Lindbergh High School. Mitigation Measures: None required. Policy Nexus: Not applicable. Environmental Review Com :tee Staff Report City Lights Apartments Page 10 November 1, 1989 5) Recreation facilities Impacts: The proponent has provided an indoor recreation center including a spa, exercise room and lounge. The center includes an outdoor deck. There is also an outdoor seating area for adults, as well as a covered play area for children. In conjunction with site plan review, staff will recommend fencing of the children's play area as necessary for safety, provision of a covered., congregate area at the mail boxes (including seating, illumination, plantings, and a bulletin board) to enhance "neighborliness" on the site. Improvements to off-site facilities will be required to accommodate impacts from this development on those public recreation facilities. The playfields at Fred Nelson School, immediately east of this site, provide an excellent opportunity for recreation for residents of City Lights. School officials are willing to open their facilities to City Lights residents. There are concerns, however, raised by school representatives, City Lights representatives, and some City staff members (Police Department, City Attorney, Planning Division) , relating to the ability to maintain safety and security of persons and property on the City Lights parcel if there is open access to the School from this site. For example, Fred Nelson School personnel do not want children crossing Benson Avenue, which has a high volume of traffic, and shortcutting through City Lights to. the school. There is also concern that children may "disappear" from school through City . Lights during the school day. City Lights proponents are concerned that children travelling through the residential complex may be injured and/or may vandalize the property. A suggestion that a gate be provided which is locked, and accessed by keys held by residents -- if consistent use of this lock could be ensured, this plan would be viable, but there is a question as to whether it is possible to depend upon residents, particularly children, to adhere to the necessary security rules. Mitigation Measures: That the applicant be required to provide a fee of $10, 675. 00 ($175. 00 x 61 units) to mitigate off-site recreation impacts. Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance, 4-2822 ; WAC 197-11-960 B. 12 . ; Comprehensive Parks Plan. • Environmental Review Comer `.tee Staff Report `V) City Lights Apartments Page 11 November 1, 1989 g. Construction Impacts Impacts: Grading, filling (of material excavated on the site) and construction on this site is anticipated to create noise impacts, dust and debris, and traffic impacts. Standard mitigation plans are considered to be generally adequate to address these issues. Erosion is considered to ,be a substantial concern due to the steep terrain -- erosion control plans must be provided and construction activities which may result in erosion (e.g. grading, filling) must be confined to the dry season; any uncovered soil must be hydroseeded prior to the beginning of the rainy season. Mitigation Measures: That the applicant be required to provide a construction management plan including: a) an erosion control plan, including soils management, construction date restrictions (May 1st to September 1st, and a plan for hydroseeding any open areas on the site by September 15th; b) a plan for wheel-washing of construction trucks prior to departure from the site; c) a plan for periodic watering down of the site to control dust; d) a plan for hauling hours and routes to control traffic impacts; e) a plan for construction hours to mitigate noise impacts; and f) a street clean-up bond in the amount of $2, 000. 00. These plans are subject to approval by the Public Works Department, Fire Prevention Bureau, Police Department and Planning Division, prior to the issuance of site preparation permits. Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance 4-2822 ; WAC 197-11-960 B. 1, B.7, B. 11, B. 14 . D. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS: Various City departments reviewed and commented upon the originally submitted project in August, 1989 ; revised plans were submitted to Traffic Engineering, Storm Water Engineering, Design Engineering, Utilities Engineering, Parks Department, Building and Planning Divisions. Original and revised comments are as follows: LAND USE COMMENTS Police Department: Original Land Use: Approved with conditions. 1) Installation of tot lot area for toddlers. 2) Installation of lighting within stairwell, particularly ground level on buildings 4 and 5 (those with garages) . 3) Approved numbering system. V Revised: Tot lot and lighting is planned. Approved numbering system will be necessary. Fire Prevention Bureau: Land Use: Approved with conditions. Environmental Review Come tee Staff Report City ',lights Apartments. Page 12 November 1, 1989 Any development and/or construction shall comply with current Fire and Building Codes and Ordinances. A second means of approved access is required. Fire Department. access road/lanes shall be paved minimum width 20' ; minimum height 13 '6" . Preliminary fire flow calculations show a fire flow of 3250 is required. 3 hydrants with a minimum flow of 1000 gpm each is required. Primary hydrant is required to be within 150 feet of the structure. Secondary hydrants are required to be within 300 feet of the structure. An approved automatic sprinkler system is required to protect the total structure. All fire department access roads are to be paved and installed prior to construction. All fire hydrants are required to be installed an approved prior to construction. Revised: No new comments solicited. Design Engineering: Land Use: Not approved. 1) Temporary erosion control and storm drainage will be critical with this project. 2) Roadway grades exceeding 8% require approval from Board of Public Works. 3) Possible conflict with rockery wall being set in 20' util/road easement adj . to Benson Rd. 4) Full offsite imp. required on Benson Rd. This Department cannot approve preliminary plans. Revised: Verbal conditional approval, with full approval to be based upon suitable erosion control system, permit from Board of Public Works for road grading, and off-site improvements to be provided on Benson Road. Proposed rockeries have been scaled down to a maximum of ten feet, however, all rockeries above four feet will require approval by City and by a certified engineer for the project. Traffic Engineering: Land Use: Approved with conditions. 1) The applicant perform a TIA (they must contact us for the details) . 2) Propose some measures to mitigate their impact on the intersection of Benson Road & S.E. 31st St. and the need for a signal at that location. 3) Widen their side of Benson Road in accordance with the attached plan. 4) Dedicate 8' of RDW and 12' of utility easement along the front of their property. 5) Participate' monetarily in the construction of the streetlighting on the opposite side of Benson Road. 6) Underground their utilities. 7) Construct their driveways in accordance with City Standards (See corrections on the Plans) . . Revised: (See attached letter, dated 8/16/89 from Richard Nordon) . Environmental Review Com: tee Staff Report City Lights Apartments Page 13 November 1, 1989. Utility Engineering: Land Use: Not approved. All requests for the release of City easements must follow process and procedure set by City. Water and sewer system development charge - $24,500. Separate water and sewer plans required. Approved fire hydrant locations by Fire Dept. Fire flow analysis may be required. Existing sanitary sewer line must be relocated. Require plans for developers extensions of existing utilities per Renton standards. Revised: Verbal comments indicating that plans for release of easements and relocation of utility lines are likely to be granted for this project. Storm Water Utility: Not approved. 1) Open drainage channel needs to be left open unless it is shown that such channel presents an erosion problem. 2) A temporary erosion control plan needs to be provided and work will be performed within a May 1st through September 1st construction window. 3) Detention system should be located outside of the roadway easement. 4) Detention will be based upon a 25 year storm with a 5 year release rate. Existing detention will need to be accounted for .in design. 5) A baffled oil/water separator will be required. A biofiltration swale should be incorporated into the design. Revised: Project approved, subject to above conditions #2 - #5. Open drainage channel may be closed. Plans for rerouting intermittent swale are in process. (See September 7 letter attached) . Parks and Recreation: Land Use: Not approved. Need more information. Revised: Not received as of 10/26/89) Building Division: Land Use: Not. approved. 1) Rockeries not appropriate as retaining walls. 2) Buildings are over easements. Piping may not be proper for under buildings. 3) No building code check done. Revised: Rockeries will need engineering approval. Building location approved, pending Public Works approval. Current Planning Division: Land Use: 1) Preservation of additional trees on site should be required. 2) Additional coniferous tree planting should be done along the north and south sides for additional buffering. 3) Pedestrian walkways should connect to sidewalk along Benson Road. ' 4) Picnic tables and seating areas would be desirable around the complex. 5) Driveway grades exceeds 8% on the site and can only exceed this' by approval from the Board of Adjustment. Enviror2.mental Review Com :tee Staff Report City Lights Apartments Page 14 November 1, 1989 6) Landscaping to north is not even to min. 5' width by parking lot. 7) Need detail of project sign to approve. 8) Rockeries and retaining walls should be softened with vegetation. 9) Recommend smaller, pedestrian scale lighting standards around walkways and entrances to buildings. Revised: 1) Are bockemies acceptable? Still very high up to 10' . 2) A walkway should be provided from Benson Road to the complex. Perhaps extending sidewalk along south side of Recreation Center. 3) The project sign requires a 10' setback along Benson Rd. (2 ' provided?) . 4) Need to define limits of 6' high screening fence. 5) Will 3rd floor units take advantage of cathedral ceilings? 6) South parking stall adjacent Bldg. #4 seems rather close -- can it be pulled back and landscaping increased between it and the building? Long Range Planning: Land Use: Request for more information. Proposed project may leave substantial impacts on traffic, storm drainage system, vegetation, aesthetics, and parks and recreation facilities. The proposed density is too high for the area. The site is rather hilly and steep (steepest slope on the site is about 40%) . Cut and fill will be utilized for the development. This would change the material land form and features of the site ; it may create significant erosion problems. The applicant should prepare an expanded initial study to address the impacts, particularly, the cumulative impacts on the areas mentioned above. ENVIRONMENTAL COMMENTS Police Department: Probable minor impact - public services. There is no indication of a "tot lot" or other toddler play area. There should be. Unit number will need to be approved by police. Lighting will need to be installed within stair well. Vehicle access is poor to this location. Fire Prevention Bureau: Probable minor impact - public services. Design Engineering: Probable minor impact - transportation and utilities. All requests for the release of City easements must follow process and procedure set by City. Water and sewer system development charge - $24, 500. Separate water and sewer plans required. Approved fire hydrant locations by Fire Dept. Fire flow analysis may be required. Existing sanitary sewer line must be relocated. Require plans for developers extensions of existing utilities per Renton standards. Environmental Review Come ,tee Staff Report City Lights Apartments Page 15 November 1, 1989 • Traffic Engineering: Probable minor impact - transportation. Approved subject to the following conditions: 1) The applicant perform a TIA (they must contact us for the details) . 2) Propose some measures to mitigate their impact on the intersection of Benson Road & S.E. 31st St. and the need for a signal at that location. 3) Widen their side of Benson Road in accordance with the attached plan. 4) Dedicate 8' of RDW and 12 ' of utility easement along the front of their property. 5) Participate monetarily in the construction of the streetlighting on the opposite side of Benson Road. 6) Underground their utilities. Revised: (See attached letter, dated 8/16/89 from Richard Nordon) . Utility Engineering: Probable minor impact - utilities. 1) Existing sanitary sewer line for Fred Nelson School must be relocated. 2) Require watermain extension and sewer extension. 3) Require plans for above extensions per City's standards for development extension. 4) Require release of easements by City Council, through easement vacation procedures.. Storm Water Utilities: Probable minor impact - water. 1) Open drainage channel needs to be left open unless it is shown that such channel presents an erosion problem. 2) A temporary erosion control plan needs to be provided and work will be performed within a May 1st through September 1st construction window. 3) Detention system should be located outside of the roadway easement. 4) Detention will be based upon a 25 year storm with a 5 year release rate. Existing detention will need to be accounted for in design. 5) A baffled oil/water separator will be required. A biofiltration swale should be incorporated into the design. Revised: Project approved, subject to above conditions #2 - #5. Open drainage channel may be closed. Plans for rerouting intermittent swale are in process. (See September 7 letter attached) . Parks and Recreation: More information necessary. In addition to on-site `recreational impacts. This action will increase the City's need for park land by 1.47 acres (Park Comprehensive Plan standards) . What is the proposed mitigation of this impact? Building Division: Probable minor impact - housing. Current Planning Division: 1) A poor job has been done on preserving existing native trees on the site, especially to the north, south, and west sides. 2) Note: Rockeries Environmental Review Com -:tee Staff Report City Lights Apartments Page 16 November 1, 1989 appear too high. Civil drawing illustrates rockery as high as 15 feet. 3) Note: buildings are constructed over storm drainage and sanitary sewer easements. Revised: 1) Are bockemies acceptable? Still very high up to 10' . 2) A walkway should be provided from Benson Road to the complex. Perhaps extending sidewalk along south side of Recreation Center. 3) The. project sign requires a 10' setback along Benson Rd. (2' provided?) . 4). Need to define limits of 6' high screening fence. 5) Will 3rd floor units take advantage of cathedral ceilings? 6) South parking stall adjacent Bldg. #4 seems rather close -- can it be pulled back and landscaping increased between it and the building? Long Range Planning: Request for more information. Proposed project may leave substantial impacts on traffic, storm drainage system, vegetation, aesthetics, and parks and recreation facilities. The proposed density is too high for the area. The site is rather hilly and steep (steepest slope on the site is about 40%) . Cut and fill will be utilized for the development. This would change the material land form and features of the site ; it may create significant erosion problems. The applicant should prepare an expanded initial study to address the impacts, particularly, the cumulative impacts on the areas mentioned above. Revised: Applicant has reduced density and addressed storm drainage/erosion concerns. 4) That the applicant be required to design the landscaping plan so that the Benson Road corridor is fully visible from the site. 4P VI) CITY OF RENTON .JL PUBLIC WORKS bEPARTivtENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Traffic Engineering Division August 16, 1989 Mr. John Miller • President, North Bay • 633 North Mildred, Suite g Tacoma,WA 98406 • RE: CITY LIGHTS APARTMENTS 2500 Block of Benson Road ECF; - 087 - 89 Dear Mr. Miller: . I would like to take this moment to reemphasize the position of the .Transportation Services Division concerning your project and any new development that has an impact concerning the intersection of Benson Road & SE 31st Street. This intersection presently warrants a traffic signal to alleviate the. congestion and delay that the public is experiencing. Any 'new development utilizing this intersection will have a negative impact upon the environment unless measures are taken to change these conditions. The options that are open as the City sees them are to approve but delay new development until the City can fund a new signal, or new development could contribute a reasonable fee towards the construction of the required signal. Following our meeting of August 7 , 1989, I conducted an estimate of the construction costs to design and build a traffic signal at the intersection of Benson Road & SE 31st Street. If you find the expenses listed on the attached estimate to be in line with your own experience in' construction, then this estimate could be agreed upon to serve as the basis for any SEPA traffic mitigation measures for your project. I think a reasonable traffic mitigation fee could be tied to the percentage of new PM peak traffic versus ' total existing PM peak traffic that enters the intersection would represent the amount of mitigation required by the City. The cost of the new signal according to my estimate would be $114 , 352 and to use Benson Place Apartments as an example, ' along with the information supplied by the study conducted by The Transpo Group, Inc. , the mitigation fee would be: Benson Place Apt. PM Peak 14 vehicles Existing Traffic ' PM Peak 1028 vehicles 14 / 1028 = 1. 36% of .$114 , 352 or $1557. 32 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2620 Fncslmun (206) 235-2613 Mr. John Miller • August 16, 1989 page 2 This percentage is slightly higher than the study by Transpo, but provides the city with a constant to check every new project (ie. 1028 existing vehicles) . These funds would be initially used towards the design of the signal (Phase I) , when sufficient funds are collected, and then subsequent development would be used to pay for the construction of the signal (Phase II) . As in all mitigation fees, if the public cannot spend the funds towards this agreed upon project within a five-year period, then the funds would be returned to the developer. If you find the information proposed in this letter to your understanding, then please signify by writing to Ms. Lenora Blauman, Current Planning Division, with your proposed mitigation fee. As in all new development, if you can find some other means of not having an impact on the above mentioned intersection, we are ready to review any proposal you might have. Respectfully, i1/0.14 Richard H. Nordon Ass't Transportation Planning Engr. Attachment cc: Gary Norris, Trans. Systems Manager Clint Morgan, Traffic Specialist --Lenora Blauman, Senior Planner John Nason John Mason Architect Benson Road & SE 31st Street File INTERSECTION SI0NALIZATION ESTIMATE for Benson Road & BE 31st Street 1. Saw Cutting 545 if $7 , 538 2 . Trenching & Backfill 1415 if $6, 562 3 . Intersection Patching 16 tons $300 4 . Conduit (all Sizes) 4145 if $10, 656 5. Wire (all sizes) 5, 378 if $2, 440 6 . Intersection Lighting 9 loc. System $15, 938 7 . Vehicle Detectors 15 loops $11, 099 8 . Pedestrian Crossing 4 loc. System $6, 285 9 . Signal Meads & 8 heads Installation $8, 688 10. Traf. Sig. Poles & Installation 3 ea. $10, 625 11. Opticom System 1 ea. $4 , 480 12 . Traffic Sig. Controller, 1 ea. Cabinet & Install. $10, 925 13 . Pavement Markings lump sum $7 , 538 14 . Traffic Control lump sum $l, QO0 SUBTOTAL $98 , 156 16. 51 Engr. & Inspection $16, 196 TOTAL $114 , 352 All the prices from above were derived from bids received on the December 2, 1987 bid opening on the SW Sunset Blvd. project with an increase of approximately 4 . 5% to reflect inflation. • ( .. '• • • Ma1pi it KNI-/1-1t414 • 6'wtt�•raj4Dhu�( 1 it, ms cc r0,494-NT 'cb►k. .R/tJ Z 1•... 0.........4.. ..T. :w.e • tnitrnitnirlrlllil IIl1nln U Ujjtill ri ptrrr/iit111)Ulllli I 'iliil irirliilin llllllUli • -- I i. • • llltlll/11 nn/llnilnn/riili iru/nintl/nnttt4ii9n/niiTRirrriirfi?!li/i lit iflliitiidRillttiii/iil /m' ' . . /ra' 137' TO �`"j Ip1E EC'( '/ V • fit7il O� �,tIF6NB�(T' . yt • .t ze5 - U . TA a nc1uN . RJrJ 6'colts. sou I Nit . . TO 4-L.eNps k/AI.K �` W•r ii 4 ttltflhj! lt jiittlll■ ill ■1/t/rr/ltrrtltttriirtir/trt tltlliiilil/ltlltilttllli union iliiiiiiirlliilliiiirliititirllllllltl .V8)::: ltrt/iS'171111 li/tt/■ III .tt/tliltirlltltrttt'llitltlt t'ull'Itllllllllttttlt)ttlllil rirll 11rr1iirii •••//rtlll irl iiiierpliMINNI -- ION 4 ' ''‘'. ►J.4t3C �� 'rvcAL . • 7 . . , ) ,,, . . , 4-loom. sr.c-rIa1{ • • • h(47' tP. kW 1JiP7N,� s, • TVEEEEEb1 : [EVEWP BY -..J Y+nrsvo Cm( LAI-ITS AFT. • VIG'T021A HILLS 4 _ L•4Nn .95c-i1Of4 • • t- . • urnntigiitin■u. iryrriririunnlriYrtlellimaitiAmerriiiuIrriiriltiilnrrnu ririgryiisiwliii i, • +_ frignrrrehinrrnrriiltliiirrriitilitnirtiiiyrrrntiiTTlrriitrTTtilrnt rfitilurrarTTTiliitrsiT1?i7iitliiiiiitr , . a �z . S'ca4c.. WI• . 5-Litj-1 55C-11 0 14SZk;s.-5--'-liii' II' ' . \ . • a • _ • • iftttirititunrrire9rrtirlrrirrirnrmirtwemmrimpy(ijyr .4-LAN E3 3 e.CT l bK TD .OLRT}{ PfZeirletTY LiHla. r DP V ICTDI'IA N i LLB • • ENT ' 10 ' Z9 ' • • • r tL -1.,4IJ8_ a'r1014 CITY OF RENTON • MEMORANDUM DATE: September 7, 1989 TO: • Lenore Blauman, Senior PIanner FROM: Kim Scattarella, SCbrm Water Utility Engineer • SUBJECT: • CITY LIGHTS APTS. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW • Based upon additional information submitted to us by Pacific Engineering Company, our , recommendations for storm water drainage have been modified to include the following; 1) Based upon the soils report and study performed by Earth Consultants, it has been determined to allow the intermittent swale to be rerouted by the proposed storm drainage system. The currently existing drainage course will be backfilled according to the soils report, which is enclosed. 2) The detention pipe was relocated, and after meeting with John Ralston, Traffic Engineering, it is recommended to move the proposed swale back to at least three feet away from the edge of the proposed sidewalk. The other prescribed conditions set by Storm Water Utility were noted, and should be addressed in the next environmental review resubmittal. CITYLTS/KDS:1f Enclosure cc: Chuck Price LAW OFFICES GORDON, THOMAS, HONEYWELL, MALANCA, PETERSON 8 DAHEIM TACOMA OFFICE ALBERT R.MALANCA,P.S. JOHN R.CONNELLY,JR. SEATTLE OFFICE WARREN J.DAHEIM ALFRED M.FALK 2200 FIRST INTERSTATE PLAZA W.WALLACE CAVANAGH,JR.,P.S. MARYWAVE VAN DEREN ONE UNION SQUARE POST OFFICE BOX 1157 JAMES A.FURBER,P.S. ELIZABETH PIKE MARTIN 600 UNIVERSITY, SUITE 2101 L.R.GHILARDUCCI,JR. ALAN D.MACPHERSON TACOMA,WASHINGTON 98401-1157 VALEN H.HONEYWELL NATE D.MANNAKEE SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98101-4185 JOHN E.SLOAN THOMAS L.PALOTAS (206)572-5050 JOE GORDON,JR. DIANE J.KERO DENNIS S.HARLOWE WILLIAM R.WILKERSON (206447-9505) FACSIMILE(206)572-4516 MARK G.HONEYWELL,RS. BRADLEY A.MAXA FACSIMILE(206)622-9779 DALE L.CARLISLE,P.S. DONNA R.ROPER WILLIAM E.HOLT JUDITH A.BEARZI DANIEL P.PEPPLE SAL MUNGIA WARREN R.PETERSON(1926-1989) RONALD B.LEIGHTON LINDA J.BARNARD-KING OF COUNSEL THOMAS L.FISHBURNE(1939-1987) JOHN C.GUADNOLA WARREN E.MARTIN JOSEPH H.GORDON DONALD W.HANFORD H.JANE NORTH CHARLOTTE N.CHALKER,P.S. GREGORY A.PARKER CHARLES L.THOMAS TIMOTHY J.WHITTERS EILEEN S.PETERSON HARDYN B.SOULE REPLY TO TACOMA OFFICE WILLIAM T.LYNN F.MIKE SHAFFER KENNETH G.KIEFFER BRADLEY B.JONES COUNSEL JAMES C.WALDO TERRY L.BRINK JOHN L.PATTERSON ROBERT G.HUTCHINS,P.S. STEPHANIE A.AREND PATRICIA K.SCHAFER MATTHEW W.STANLEY ALISON L.ANDERSON J.RICHARD CREATURA JACKSON SCHMIDT MICHAEL D.HITT LAWRENCE F.BROWN,JR. DONALD S.COHEN JUDY RAE JASPRICA. ROBERT C.GRAYSON JAMES T.SEELY VICTORIA L.VREELAND SHERRY L.CLARK WILLIAM D.WHITMAN MARY KAY HIGH • June 27, 1991 Ms. Lenora Blauman• City of Renton Development Planning Section Municipal Bldg., Floor 3 200 Mill Ave. S. Renton, WA 98055 Re: City Lights Apartment Project Building Permits B-16418-422 • Dear Ms. Blauman: I received your message on my voice mail regarding the City of Renton's agreement to refund the traffic light fee of $1,557.32 and the park's fee of $10,675 in the event that North Bay Development Corporation does not construct under these building permits. Although we are not making a formal request at this time to receive a refund, by this letter I am confirming that the refund will be made upon formal writ- ten request, if the project is not constructed under the above identified building permits. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. Very ly yours, . 0�-1 tephame A. Arend SAA:jm cc: John Miller ITA911780.0341 Vira.C3Y7 - CITY OF RENTON RECEIVED AUG 2 8 1990 BUILDING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: August 28, 1990 TO: Lenora Blauman, Senior Planner FROM: Gregg Zimmerman, Plan Review Supervisor 62 SUBJECT: City Lights Apartments Construction Management Plan 1. Clearing and grubbing, grading, and excavation activities are proposed beyond the May 1st to September 1st construction window. Temporary erosion and sedimentation control plans should be revised to include provisions for work during the rainy season. Submit revised TESCP plans for work during the rainy season to the City. 2. A narrative plan is required for wheelwashing of construction trucks prior to departure from the site (i.e. assigned personnel, all wheels washed prior to departure when mud is present, etc.) Also, describe frequency and site conditions associated with dust control. 3. Condition 6)a) "...plan to hydroseed permeable areas on the site by September 15th-" has not been specifically addressed. The schedule indicates "site stabilization" occurring the first week in November. If this includes hydroseeding, it is too late in the season for the hydroseed to attain sufficient growth to protect the site from winter rains. Applicant should be required to provide a new plan to protect the site during the winter months. 4. Wheel washing and street cleaning plans should provide for siltation controls - probably more than placing permeable filter fabric covers on inlets which has not proven sufficient in the past - to protect watercourses/wetlands from silt buildups. 5. Hauling hours shall be limited to 8:30 to 3:30 Monday through Friday. 6. The issue required in condition 6)e) re: noise mitigation has not been addressed. ww/u/ctylits/GZ/AJH/bh J $•• ' CITY OF RENTON _.,." • . LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER Earl Clymer, Mayor Fred J. Kaufman April 10, 1990 Mel Easter Johnson Braund Design Group 130 Andover Park East, Suite 301 Seattle, WA 98188 Re: City Light Apartments SA-087-90 Dear,''"'Mr. Easter: The Examiner's Report regarding the referenced application which was ' published on March 27, 1990 has not been appealed within the. 14-day period established by ordinance. Therefore, this matter is considered final and is being transmitted to the City Clerk this date for filing. Please feel free to contact this office if further assistance or information is required. Sincerely, • 11-711 FRED J. KAUFMAN • HEARING EXAMINER FJK:dk cc: City Clerk Building Division Planning Division • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2593 51.1141.44* Davis&R011flS PLANNING I N C O R I' O R A T E I) CITY OF RENTON 500 South 336th,Suite 102,Federal Way,WA 98003 (206)874-3888 Fax:(206)874-9682 AUG 1 0 1990 August 10, 1990 REC '1 vED LENORA BLAUMAN SENIOR PLANNER CITY OF RENTON 200 MILL AVE S RENTON WA 98055 RE: CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLAN CITY LIGHTS APARTMENTS Dear Lenora: I am enclosing a copy of the Construction Management Plan for your review. This is submitted in accordance with Condition 6 of our Declaration of Non-Significance - Mitigated, and your review notes to our plan submission. I am enclosing three additional copies for submission to the Public Works Department, Fire Prevention Bureau, and the Police Department to expedite the review process. If you have any questions or require additional information, please call me at the above listed number. Sincerely, DA & ROLLINS, INC. Da . Huls Vice President, Development cc: Public Works Department Mel Easter Fire Prevention Bureau Greg Diener Police Department Mike Davis Lynn Guttmann Tim Collins John Miller Construction Management Plan City Lights Apartments Prepared by Davis & Rollins, Inc., Contractor Submitted to the City of Renton August 10, 1990 This Construction Management Plan is submitted in accordance with Condition 6 of the Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated issued for the City Lights Apartments. This plan will address each of the points mentioned in the DNS separately. One item that is critical to this plan is the approval by the Public Works Department for erosion causing activities to occur between the period September 1, 1990 and May 1,. 1991. Davis & Rollins, Inc. agrees to have a certified soils engineer on site during all work.hours as required. The anticipated start date of September 1, 1990 makes this request necessary. a) Erosion Control Plan. Upon completion of the staking of clearing limits, all designed silt fence and temporary erosion control measures will be constructed in sequence and maintained throughout the earthwork and utility construction phase of the project. Clearing and grubbing of the site will occur as soon as the temporary construction entrances and silt fences are installed. . We will excavate and export approximately 11,000 c.y. of dirt from'.the site. The earthwork - cuts, fills, and rockeries - will take three week. Installation of utility systems, (sewer, water, and storm drainage) will overlap the earthwork. The utilities are expected to be installed and backfilled in 3 weeks. During the underground construction, all temporary erosion control shown on the approved drawing will be maintained to provide sediment control to the areas that have been disturbed. As mentioned above, a certified soils engineer will be present during all these operations. Construction Management Plan City Lights Apartments August 10, 1990 Page -2- b) Wheel Washing of Construction Trucks. c) Dust control of Site. Temporary driveways will be prepared to allow truck access onto and off the sit. Quarry spall driveways will be placed at each entrance driveway to clean the wheels of trucks. The earthwork subcontractor will provide the required equipment to pressure wash the truck wheels before they leave the site. The water truck will also be used for site dust control and street cleaning during earthwork operations. d) Hauling Hours and Routes. The exported material will be exported to the Stoneway Fill Site on Lake Francis Road on the Maple Valley Highway. The loaded trucks will leave the site south bound on Benson to Petrovisky where they will turn left on Petrovisky (SE 176th at this point) and continue east to Renton-Maple Valley Road, turning right and travelling to SE Lake Francis Road. Empty trucks will return on the reverse route. e) Construction Hours. Hauling will occur between 7:30 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Monday through Friday and 9:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. on Saturday. Submitted by: DAVIS & ROLLLINS, INC. David W. Huls Vice President, Development CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLAN CITY LIGHTS APARTMENTS PREPARED BY DAVIS & ROLLINS, INC. , CONTRACTOR WORK FLOW PROJECTION September October November December 5 15 25 5 15 . 25 5 15 25 5 15 25 Preconstruction i Survey & Stake Construction Ent. I Erosion Control i Clearing Earthwork Rockeries Utilities 11111111111 Site Stabilization DavisdJ1 a &ROl11nS �' INCORPORATED f 1 1� ,k0 500 South 336th,Suite 102 l Federal Way,WA 98003 .411- 2,(0,5QV BLAUMAN cm-oFina SENIOR PLANNER C E 1 V E CITY OF RENTON ' fl 200 MILL AVE S 9 AUG 1 0 1990 S RENTON WA 98055 !_.�.ElY.';'_i,=:NG DIVISION •. SA - o ic 7 -lir PLANNING DIVISION JohnSonBraund t o CITY OF RENTON n �- 2i design group, Inc. architecture, landscape & planning consultants JUL1 1990 ' CE1IV PHONE LOG ElMEMO ❑ CONFERENCE j$ INFO LJ Distribution: Nor i Project c _ ____4 Project No. _f — rj2 `A Air Date_7'2 - 1 Time t _ 0 Incoming Call ❑ Cc: !�'�' � EE ,k non& ; . Person Outgoing Call Li Company Phone No. File cal'61eAr c.c w i tk : Lenora_ Rlounivi ioavio _ Mikis WO-ftu_ t1 1kt_ i © pe -i W a‹ fv rM trAr- vie ft Kann 4 N r aaget 7 Cff , . ro((owrir? arc. t# rertl -r 0 oG c ston rit.__ b doc woo G s )Q0 h h wit� ro Uid.�. ft HAL_ c4tv incor �- rki filit,0 r�- ri s itv fhc_ eon t Qvt coo C • #2 t2i y i s �� I S re ri soh<fl''0,o h nil1. ' . al id- kith MLIZ&C 14.1 telf 'y )1e-te,--a +he- ci v rx rroctv A st wOr iQ • i 1 i - 1l ;�re, vc..v wrin ---k_ bR 1,ic w . �Dr i �!� 0 -f-kl sib Wo r1 - L MTh K►, _ / .L► . 1- 1"or, � ton ir rr _-khnt 1a rnc f b0,nk. i s notr� u� rer� �. i L t I$ ( Slk:A Signature 130 Andover Fbrk East, Suite 301 Seattle, Washington 98188 (206) 431-7960 (FAX) 431-7960 t JohnsonBraund e design group, inc, architecture, landscape & planning consultants - PHONE LOG El MEMO El CONFERENCEX, INFO El Distribution: Project cf Li / s Project No. gb • 'f ' I n0 IncomingElDate I ime 1�: Call Person Outgoing Call ❑ Company Phone No. File ❑ 'F. nivioL us , 14aPe&, -�1� 1.0;-00..ikiLo " rti cl /� no In dl , �. ON, ow 11410 r. . . iK r- o oh • Ls dok.i ' , i t_ , . ._.-Chis g1hrn OW tirq--oilif -to fke._. • r- , - , . • ' I i nt- Unk- thLs, _._ __. se •o ._...: on_ -eas ._ .�4-h¢.. . _..W . , ..... . ..._titiv, e.oflb * k t tk Wirt_Irk _..... _ .... ._ �. _._.5.- kevIiork-_. !. p `f a--- Old u _ _600 _ fil,C.- _.1414 1 :-V-11 t '/., rr\- _ frs _____.111r _ __rtorire. _.,-1-mor 1 _ _, Ilit, _` f 11 .0. _.riottic.-- 1 eir'i 4 hots.. .. rem v gritty. -.--__ yaiks, __ , , . . .1 ry - o P - . -� __ o.�,{ �� II�W�, . why _ • % o " ne t I, I mi4— DL eery 0 . ' i f , . UtY/ 1. DiVik-tlikri . W i V'(GL *roll& '6(id 11 -- - str—_ t.r _ r . S g . Sk-lam;rlinieLliaxix_-- )rri ' v'o� h pinK ' ._ . Vv t , i . Ow Signature 130 Andover Park East, Suite 301 Seattle, Washington 98188 (206) 431-7960 (FAX) 431-7960 .1,.!/J y , 441/11-- 1r.iG.� ,� IF REVISIONS, R.. JTED WITH tet-e,.), , / �:=f' PREVIOUS PLANS AND COMMENTS. GREEN NO. . CITY OF RENTON BUILDING DIVISION PLAN REVIEW ROUTING SLIP DATE 6,7� APPLICANT: //6AX i 'G ae-W, 7,/ apt JOB ADDRESS: .jam V ���% 7 NATURE OF WORK: 'GCly2/2G4�-r `' TO: Comments Due Comments Due 1 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU 1 1 BUILDING CODE REVIEW I 1 WATER SYSTEMS I 1 ENERGY CODE 1 SEWER SYSTEMS I 1 STORM DRAIN SYSTEMS. I 1 TRANSPORTATION DIVISION i I PLANNING DIVISION JAZ I 1 OTHERS I 1 MECHANICAL Comments/suggestions should be provided in writing. Please provide comments to the Building Division by 5: 00 p.m. on above date. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION 1 APPROVED 1 1 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 1 —I NOT APPROVED .0 \k - J t4,..U_._.arw\ -t.-43-- ... (MA UlcA-k C A.K-- . 0 kw..4 i tt-- -C.-Efrt rttr,.... ��-cam�.,,,e, . f) That the applicant be required to provide arconstruction management plan including: c'a)"an erosion control plan, ., accompanied by an agreement to confine construction activities which might result in erosion to the periodfrom May 1st to September 1st, and a plan to hydroseed permeable areas on the site by. September' 15th -- if theapplicant wishes to undertake construction activities during other periods in the year, advance permission must be obtained from the Public Works Department, and a -certified soils engineer must be on site at all times when work is underway; b) a plan for wheel-washing of construction trucks prior to departure from the site; c) a plan for periodic watering down of the site to control dust; d) a plan for hauling hours and routes to control traffic impacts; e) a plan for construction hours to mitigate noise impacts ; and f) a renewable street clean-up bond in the amount of $2 , 000. 00 . These plans are subject to approval by the Public .Works Department, Fire Prevention • Bureau, Police Department and Planning Division, prior to the issuance of site preparation permits. • .L___) VNAL-A-aLA (-6-1,4,..10-T4- r,....4....,„ai„,„4-,,_ e_t___ ‘410-1...a.... - vs-1 uL-v,_\o-t- s(- LA.s.,....._ 6_,qa_t_x_,„....1- c...c.bi ,i L.-N c.J_Aks2.__,__ pputrirs..‘xt . LUNJ '10, Wu-(L�----� DATE I �'t"I Signature of Dir ctor Or Authorized Representative forms#2 :pinrev CDVbLd022(2/13/90) • , SI • , G • _I . eTrL k_CSUL &.• C - yQD 0 t-L9 cs-A 13- 4-13:.C.-J /U.)(5A-Q/l<D • , 611;46,),-,A4-L*Li.--' • " 1 - ' vnirYnAc\-- 1110 \-") IC) Lkr-'"St- i L.km.ati/ (1•D , „,... Dav �-. �. PLANNING DIVISION bI! Oiill 1s CITY OF RENTON INCORPORATED JU9211990 500 South 336th,Suite 102,Federal Way,WA 98003(206)874-3888 Fax:(206)874-9682 RECEIVED June 20, 1990 MR DON ERICKSON DIRECTOR OF CURRENT PLANNING MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE S RENTON WA 98055 Dear Mr. Erickson: I am writing you this letter to describe a complicated situation that exists involving the City of Renton, Renton City School District #403, North Bay Development Co., and my company, Davis & Rollins, Inc. North Bay is the developer/applicant for a building permit on a 61-unit apartment and we are the contractor. The School District is the owner/seller of the 3.3 acre site on the east side of Benson Road across the street from the Hillside Apartments. It has long been planned to make street widening improvements along the frontage of these two properties, but the funding vehicle has proved difficult. First City Developments, the owner of Hillside Apartments, has recently decided to perform all improvements that are a requirement of their development. This includes five-lane widening from South Puget Drive to their entrance tapering to and continuing at four- lanes to S. 26th Street. It is the requirement of our pioject, City Lights, to extend the fifth lane widening south to our southern property line and then taper back to four lanes. Due to the steep physical conditions, these are expensive and time-consuming improvements that will undoubtedly cause traffic delays. With this in mind, we were approached by the City of Renton traffic department to determine if our improvements could be included in the First City work this summer to minimize delays, confusion, and phone calls. Since that time, we have had several meetings with city officials to attempt to incorporate our plans with First City's - something that they are willing to accommodate. Mr. Don Erickson Director of Current Planning June 20, 1990 Page -2- Before I get to the purpose of this letter, I must make the following additional points: 1) Our road widening must include six feet of work on the west side of the street in right of way owned by the City of Renton. This includes a six foot retaining wall to build up from the lower Hillside Apartments. We are also building retaining walls on our property line to accommodate the widening. There is great benefit to doing the work as one project. 2) We have approximately 15,000 cubic yards of material that we must export from our site. Much of this material is suitable to serve as fill for the road widening. This could keep twice as many trucks off city streets since the road contractor won't have to import from elsewhere and we won't have to export it out. 3) We are estimating that just our portion of the work will cost $100,000 to $150,000 if done concurrently this summer. Next summer the work will cost three times as much. This obviously would have serious adverse impacts on our ability to finance the project but more importantly, would be negative value to property owned by the Renton School District. We must make you aware that we will not be able to participate in the improvements without a construction loan and we cannot get a construction loan without a building permit. We originally submitted our plans on May 3, 1990 and as of Wednesday, June 13, 1990, we received comments back from all departments. We expect to resubmit on Wednesday, June 27, 1990. We also anticipate submitting our road widening plans by this date. Obviously, much work remains to be done. We have no complaints about the attention and priority we have received to date, but we will require additional help if a building permit is to be issued by July 15, 1990. This is a request for priority treatment that will benefit the City of Renton, the Renton School District, and us. In summary, we need the building permit prior to committing to funding our road improvements for two reasons; (1) We do not have the funds available to finance the improvements but can get them the money from our construction loan and (2) quite frankly, we would not participate without the guarantee of a permit as submitted, and the only guarantee we can accept is the actual permit. Mr. Don Erickson Director of Current Planning June 20, 1990 Page -3- My hope is that you'll find this letter gives you sufficient background to understand our situation and allow you to discuss this with your staff people to assure us timely issuance of the pe S n erely, D Vice President, Development DWH/tmh cc: Lynn Gutteman Jim Hansen Ron Nelson Harold Adams Johnson Braund Design Group Pacific Engineering Company John Miller, North Bay Development Gary Kohlwes, Renton School District Davis •&Rol11nS 111A-IiiTe\t\IWA, INCORPORATED *("9/z150� ate�500 South 336th,Suite 102 Federal Way,WA 98003 MR DON ERICKSON DIRECTOR OF CURRENT PLANNING MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE S ere OFRENTON RENTON WA 98055 •RE CEI E D. JUN 2 1 1990 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) : )ss. County of King ) DOTTY KLINGMAN being first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and states: That on the 27th day of March , 1990 affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. Ate-it,_ J7 SUBSCRIBED AND , SWORN to before me this a7L day of `--2UL i , 1990 `09-)ottufly,J.- Notary Pub i i and for the State of Washington,,, residing at ( , therein. Application, Petition, or Case #: SA-087-89 - NORTH BAY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION MELVIN EASTER (CITY LImHT APARTMFNTS) (The minutes contain a list of the parties of record.) { March 27, 1990 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF.RENTON REPORT AND DECISION APPLICANT: NORTH BAY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (CITY LIGHT APARTMENTS) File No: SA-087-89 LOCATION: East side of Benson Road between Puget Drive and South 26th Street, across from Victoria Hills. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Site Plan approval for a 61 unit apartment complex to be located on 3.3 acres of R-3 zoned property SUMMARY OF ACTION: Planning Division Recommendation: Approval, with conditions. PLANNING DIVISION REPORT: The Planning Division Report was received by the o Examiner on February 27, 1990 PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Division Report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as ,. `•'' follows: MINUTES The hearing was opened on March 13, 1990 at 9:25 A.M. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. .iJ • The following exhibits were entered into the record: . Exhibit #1 - Yellow File containing application, proof of posting and publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit #2 - Vicinity Map Exhibit #3 - Site and Landscape Plan Exhibit #4 (a) and (b) - Elevations LENORA BLAUMAN. Senior Planner with the Current Planning Division of the Community Development Department reviewed this request with the following information. There are condominiums, a church and schools surrounding the subject site; the project will be a 61 unit residential development housed in four buildings with approximately 17 units in three buildings. Building #4 on the northeast portion of the site will consist of townhouse units over ground-level parking garages, with approximately 100 covered and uncovered parking spaces to be located throughout the remainder of the site. All of the proposal will be developed on the western two-thirds of the site due to topography. On the eastern portion of the site is greenbelt which slopes from 30 - 40%, with no development occurring on that portion. Vegetation will be retained; there will,be an enclosed recreation area; there will be provisions for indoor and outdoor activities as well as a children's play area, which will be fenced. The site contains a utility easement which will either be retained or relocated when the building permit is issued and it is determined exactly where the lines should be located. There is-a storm drainage channel also on the site and it has been recommended that it be exchanged for a tightline system as it is not working properly for the site or neighboring properties. Ms. Blauman noted the ERC's determination of Non-Significance, Mitigated, and read the imposed conditions into the record which provide that the applicant refrain from cutting trees until the site, landscape and tree plans have been approved; the applicant provide a traffic mitigation plan; provide insulation to limit interior ambient noise in living units and indoor recreation areas; the applicant provide a plan for screening at the boundaries of the site; provide a storm drainage management system; provide a construction management plan and make a voluntary contribution to mitigate off-site recreation impacts. City Light Apartments SA-087-89 March 27, 1990 Page 2 In reviewing criteria for site plan approval Planner Blauman stated the proposal conforms with the Comprehensive Plan goals and policies and said due to the greenbelt and other characteristics of the site the applicant has had to pare down the design from 25 to 19 units per acre. There should be no impact to the view corridor; the proposal will be a buffer between other uses surrounding the property. Open space, slope and soils protection, lot size, set backs, parking and landscape and natural environment were all reviewed. The development will address housing needs within the area, aesthetics are compatible, and it is felt area-wide property values will not be impacted. Continuing, Blauman stated staff will be requesting increased illumination on the site, improved signage, and additional pedestrian linkage down the driveway and on to Benson Road. It is anticipated approximately 372 average daily vehicle trips will be generated from the site. The Washington State Department of Transportation was notified of this application and they did not request any mitigating measures for nearby roads. Minor revisions to,the access plan will include the relocation of the proposed parking spaces on the southern side,of the northern driveway, adjacent to the recreation building, which will have to be relocated or redesigned so vehicles can back out and not interfere with the cars entering the driveway. There is ample guest parking located on the site. Access lanes will have to be marked for fire equipment; there will be plans for protecting vehicle and pedestrian traffic against the steep sloped driveways during wet and icy weather; a review was given noise mitigation plans for adjacent properties; fire and police department resources are sufficient to accommodate this site with the applicant being requested to contribute to an emergency services police bond. Schools can accommodate the approximately 15 school age children. A voluntary_c5 ntribution to the city's park plan is requested. Seattle City Light has a recorded easement on the northern boundary of the property but development does not interfere with this easement. Concluding, Blauman said staff feels this is a -well designed site plan with;a good management plan. She read staff's recommended conditions into the record. Responding for the applicant was MEL EASTER, Johnson Braund Design Group. 130 Andover Park East, Suite #301. Seattle 98188. Mr. Easter reviewed the recommendations of staff and addressing carports said they are located in specific places to serve specific buildings. He said they could relocate some of the covered carports along the eastern edge but would like the flexibility of selecting which ones were to be relocated. If they are required to relocate the carports in front of building #3 it would require those tenants to walk quite some distance to get to the units, and he feels there is no view obstruction from the carports in that location. He requested and received clarification from Ms. Blauman as to the city's-reference to emergency access lanes. Regarding illumination, he said he wants to keep as much illumination as possible within the parking areas and feels by not providing as many pole lights they would be reducing possible glare off-site. The parking stalls on the north side of the recreation building and concerns for safety he suggested the possibility of providing more 'caution' signage for vehicles driving up that sloped driveway, but will continue negotiating this concern with staff. Continuing, Mr. Easter said discussions with the Parks Department are on-going regarding the voluntary contribution for parks and it is the applicant's hope that the City Council will soon be setting out some guidelines on this issue. If necessary, a contribution will be made. Responding to the Hearing Examiner's concern as to sidewalks with a reasonable walking grade being connected to Benson Road, Mr. Easter felt there was adequate room provided in the 30 ft. setback area which could possibly contain a winding pathway down to Benson Road. KIM SCATTARELLA, Engineering Specialist for the city referenced the storm water retention requirements (25 year storage/5 year release rate). He referenced the King County Surface Design Manual containing the SCS Hydrograph Method and recommended the use of this method for the computations of retention requirements for this proposal. Responding for the city's Traffic Division was RICHARD NORDON. Mr. Nordon stated in 1989 a study was made which pointed out the need for a traffic signal at Benson Road and 31st Street. A percentage of the fee for this development's contribution amounted to $1,557.32. Normal development requirements are required to upgrade adjacent roadways. The city will be performing the off-site improvements, and when this project is completed there will be a Latecomers Agreement which will be contributed to by this developer. _ Comments and questions regarding the project were invited from the audience. Responding was GEORGE POST, 1122 South 27th Place, Renton 98055 who questioned when the specific off-site improvements would be made-(off-site sidewalks along Benson Road as well-as lights along Benson Road). Planner Blauman responded the improvements will be put in in conjunction with development of the-project - the final numbers and measurements are determined at the time of building plan approval. Mr. Post said he would like to see a specific time period identified in the conditions of approval which will ensure the improvements are completed prior to occupancy. City Light Apartments J SA-087-89 March 27, 1990 Page 3 > ✓ DONALD BAER, 918 East Laurel, Kent 98031, minister of a church on adjacent property stated his preference of lighting would be those proposed by the applicant in the carport areas and not the pole lights which he feels would interfere with lighting on the church property. He concurred with Mr. , Post's suggestion that sidewalks and other improvements be conditioned for completion before occupancy is granted. He also requested provisions be made to ensure pedestrian and vehicular trespassing, parking of construction trucks and equipment, and the dumping of dirt from the construction site onto his property will be prohibited. He expressed concern over possible erosion from the subject property emptying onto the, church property. He requested heavy landscape buffers be required to protect children and other pedestrians crossing the property. Planner Blauman replied a six foot solid wood fence is being provided,along the southern property boundary, an erosion control plan will be provided by the applicant, and the area will be hydroseeded by September 15th to prevent erosion onto the church property. Mr. Baer requested that an extension of the sidewalk on the south be made to join the sidewalk on the east for use by school children walking to school possibly eliminating the need for them to be bussed. - MEL EASTER stated his concern over the new requirement that this project use King County requirements for the storm water retention system which will cause yet another redesign; this applicant will participate financially in the installation of lights along Benson as required as a part of the Victoria , - Hills project; security will be provided by way of fencing during construction to alleviate Mr. Baer's , concerns regarding trespassing of people and machinery on adjacent church property. He said the concern of school age children passing through the site to go to school has been a serious one due to liability and they would like to discourage that movement; there is a significant easement on the north edge of the site which makes a perfect path to the school and could be used in that fashion. This approach has been discussed with the school district. ' I Closing comments from staff by Lenora Blauman referenced the parking, pole lighting and carport conditions which she clarified again for the applicant and others in attendance. The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There.was no one else wishing to speak, and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 11:00 A.M. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: Ic 1. The applicant, North Bay Development Corporation/Melvin Easter, John Braund Design Group, filed a request for approval of a site plan for a 61 unit apartment complex 2. The yellow,file containing the staff report, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. 3. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the City's responsible official, issued a Declaration of Non-Significance (DNS) Mitigated, for the subject proposal. 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. 5. The subject site is located on the east side of Benson Road South between South Puget Drive and South 26th Street (as extended easterly). The site is located immediately south of the Seattle Cedar River Pipeline right-of-way. 6. The subject site, which is owned by the Renton School District, is immediately west of and downslope from the Nelson Middle School. Spring Glen Elementary School, which is employed by the Kent School District, is located southeast of the site. 7. The 3.3 acre site was annexed to the city by the adoption of Ordinance 1909 enacted in September, 1961. The site was reclassified from G-7200 (General; Single Family Residential; Minimum lot size - 7,200 square feet) to R-3 (Medium Density Multiple Family) with the adoption of Ordinance 3468 enacted in September, 1980. 8. , The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of medium density multiple family uses and greenbelt, but does not-mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the plan. 9. The subject site slopes upward from Benson Road. The applicant proposes construction on the more moderate western and northwestern slopes where grades range from 10 to 25 percent. The eastern slopes would be left undisturbed. The slopes on the western portion of the site range from 30 to 40 percent. The hillside is studded with natural springs. City Light Apartment's SA-087-89 March 27, 1990 Page 4 10. During heavy storms drainage and debris run off the site onto Benson Road. Heavy flooding occurred along the site's Benson frontage during January's large storms. The storm system serving Victoria Hills, which is west of the site, was overburdened. 11. The applicant proposes developing a 61 unit apartment complex on the subject site. The R-3 • zoning would normally permit approximately 82 units on the 3.3 acre site. Greenbelt regulations intended to safeguard steep slopes would require a reduction to 70 units. The applicant has reduced that density to 61 units to achieve a balance of housing, parking and useable open space on the site. 12. The complex will consist of four apartment buildings, a recreation building, carports and open parking. The buildings will be numbered 1 to 4, beginning along the southwest corner of the site and running to the northeast. 13. Buildings 1 and 3 will each contain 18 units. Building 2 will contain 17 units (The applicant's Exhibit 2 shows 23 units which would create a 67 unit complex. This discrepancy is ignored.), while Building 4 will contain 8 units. With the exception of Building 4 which contains only 2 bedroom townhouse units, the other buildings will contain a mix of 1 and 2 bedroom units. 14. Building 4 will be two stories over covered parking. The other three buildings will be 2 1/2 stories. The maximum height will be approximately 35 feet, whereas 50 foot structures are permitted. 15. The buildings will be finished in horizontal applied wood siding, corner trim, aluminum windows with trim and metal pipe railing for decks and terraces. The building will have pitched roofs. The building will contain a variety of faceting and articulations to break the visual appearance and bulk of the buildings. Some of the windows will be bay style windows. 16. The applicant will divide the required 107 parking stalls between 8 garages, 53 carports and 46 open spaces. The 8 garages would be located under Building 4. The carports would be located throughout the site providing a mix of carports and open spaces for each of the buildings and residents. Parking will be located between the buildings and the steeped sloped rear property line. The applicant believes that the arrangement of carports and buildings stepping up the slopes will afford reasonable views to each of the units. Exhibit 4A demonstrates the view. corridors. 17. Approximately 45 percent (or approximately 64,000 square feet) of the site will be paved or covered with impervious surfaces. The remaining 55 percent (or approximately 80,000 square feet) will be open space and landscaped. The applicant has provided setbacks which meet and generally exceed those required by code. 18. A variety of larger shade trees will be planted along the frontage above Benson Road. A mixture of ornamental shrubs, bushes and flowering trees will be planted across the site including throughout the parking areas. 19. An eight inch water main and an eight inch sewer line are located along Benson Road. Two utility lines cross the site. One line is near the center line of the site, with the second just north of the center line. One or both of these lines will need to be relocated subject to approval of the Public Works Department. 20. Storm water draining from the site flows into a culvert under Benson Road. Staff apparently calculated storm water retention/detention needs using two separate methodologies. The newer system now employed by King County would require a more conservative holding capacity. Staff suggests that after the recent flooding along Benson Road that the newer system be used to calculate storm water flows. The details of storm drainage, utility easement relocation and utility lines to serve the site will not be completed until after this review. Staff may use the more conservative methodology to calculate storm water needs for the site. 21. The resident population of the complex would be approximately 110 persons. The school age population would be approximately 15 students over the various grades. 22. Cascade Elementary School is one mile east of the site. Nelson Middle School is adjacent to the east, although the topography makes direct access difficult at best. Renton High School is north of the site. City Light Apartments SA-087-89 March 27, 1990 Page 5 23. The applicant proposes a recreation center. It will be located between Buildings 2 and 3. The middle school has recreational space available although access from the site could be circuitous. Talbot Hill Park is located west of the site and Philip Arnold Park is northeast of the site. The applicant has been requested to voluntarily contribute to a park fund. The applicant has not made a decision on participation. 24. The development of the subject site will generate approximately 372 average daily vehicle trip ends. The applicant has been required to participate in traffic improvements along its frontage along Benson including widening and street lighting, and participate in a traffic signal at S.E. 31st Street south of the complex. Staff indicated that with the proposed mitigation measures that roads in the vicinity of the subject site could handle the demand generated by the development of the subject site. 25. A geotechnical survey was done to assess soils and erosion potential. The guidelines suggested in that report will be followed by the applicant and reviewed by the Public Works Department and the Building Department. Work will be limited to the "dry" season to prevent sluffing on the site. 26. Staff noted that the parking stalls located northeast of the proposed recreation building could impair circulation as they back onto the northern entrance driveway. The drive could have a steep grade with poor sight distance. The Fire Department wants•clear access to the structures through landscaping materials and a marked fire lane. Driveway grades will be subject to review by the Board of Public Works as the grades may exceed code requirements. 27. The plans do not demonstrate any pedestrian access to Benson Road nor any connection through the site to the east across the steep slopes. On this last point, school age children apparently do cross this site and the church site located to the south, and as a practical matter it may be necessary to accommodate this fact. CONCLUSIONS 1. The site plan ordinance provides a number of specific criteria for reviewing a site plan. Those criteria are generally represented in part by the following enumeration: a. Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan; b. Conformance with the Building and Zoning Codes; c. Mitigation of impacts on surrounding properties and uses; d. Mitigation of the impacts of the proposal on the subject site itself; e. Conservation of property values; f. Provision for safe and efficient vehicle and pedestrian circulation; g. Provision of adequate light and air; h. Adequacy of public services to accommodate the proposed use; The proposed use satisfies these and other particulars of the ordinance. 2. In addition, proposed site plans must not adversely affect area-wide property values, must provide adequate air and light, and must not cause neighborhood deterioration or blight. The proposal appears to successfully satisfy these additional criteria. 3. The Comprehensive Plan designates the site for the multiple family purposes proposed by the applicant. The development will provide additional residential choices on an interesting site. Urban services are located about a mile north in downtown Renton, and development of the site will infill an already developed corridor without creating additional urban sprawl. 4. The two to two and a half story buildings comply with the Zoning Code. The development meets lot coverage requirements, height limitations and setback requirements. It also meets the Parking and Loading Code Requirements. The applicant should work with staff to alter the stall arrangements nearest the northern driveway to eliminate or minimize unsafe maneuvering at the top of the driveway. Presumably structural details will comply with the Building Code, but review at that level is not part of site plan review. ►\ City Light Apartments SA-087-89 March 27, 1990 Page 6 5. The site is topographically separated from the neighboring property to the east and should not have any impact on the adjoining schools. The setbacks on the north and south appear reasonable, but screening should remain subject to staff approval to assure that neighboring properties are not affected either by the construction on the site or the eventual residents. 6. The applicant is preserving the natural slopes on the eastern third of the site which should lessen any adverse impact. The applicant has also reduced the density from a potential 80 units to 61 thereby lessening the impacts on adjacent properties and lessening the chance of slope problems by maintaining vegetation and natural soils. 7. The buildings are well spaced across the site, take advantage of the terrain and are sufficiently articulated to provide visual interest and avoid the boxy appearance found in some larger apartment complexs. In addition, the trim details, including window trim, roof treatment and terrace rails avoid monotony. 8. The applicant should work with staff to assure that the appropriate landscape materials are planted near the building to provide emergency equipment access and to provide safe sight distances near parking stalls and entry driveways. Similarly the fencing should be subject to approval of the planning staff. 9. Development of the site should not have any adverse impact on property values, and obviously the site's value will increase with development adding to the tax base of the city. 10. Staff has suggested that the approximately 370 vehicle trips generated by the proposed development can be accommodated along Benson and the nearby intersections, particularly with the applicant's participation in traffic improvements along the corridor including the widening of Benson in conjunction with the Victoria Hills complex located west of Benson. The traffic and turning movements along this corridor require that these improvements be coordinated with this development and be installed prior to occupancy. This condition should not be altered, nor should improvements along this corridor be further delayed. 11. The applicant shall add pedestrian amenities on the site and connecting the site with Benson Road. Any sidewalk shall provide a reasonable grade that can accommodate people in business attire or the elderly. Staff and the applicant shall work together to provide a pedestrian passage through the subject site, or adjacent site, to safely accommodate both adults and children who wish to reach the school properties to the east. The applicant indicated that these sites could supplement the on-site recreation if they did not participate in the park fund contribution, but these sites to the east could only be accessed through very circuitous routes and would not provide reasonable and accessible recreational amenities for the' subject site. In addition, providing safe access would only accept the inevitable passage of people through the site. Since the school district still owns the subject site, the sidewalk could be developed by, or in conjunction with that agency. The applicant should provide an area near the mail boxes for casual congregation and socializing. ' 12. Again, the spacing of the buildings and the topographical relief will assure this site of adequate light and air. The topographical relief and the landscaping and fencing around the site should minimize noise on the site. 13. The public services, particularly water and sewer, are adequate to serve the site. Storm water drainage from the site and parcels east of the site has been a problem. Under the circumstances the Public Works Department's institution of a more conservative storm water assessment methodology is appropriate. In addition, site plan review is not intended to scrutinize structural details such as that, therefore, there should have been no reliance on preliminary reviews of storm water system details for this review. Further, the applicant is modifying the natural ravine's characteristics and this remains subject to approval of the Public Works Department to assure that it has the appropriate characteristics to contain the storm water passing through the site. 14. Staff has again requested the imposition of a bond for extraordinary police services. This office does not believe that the imposition of such a bond is warranted without specific criteria in place, particularly since the bond for park construction is voluntary in the absence of similar criteria. DECISION The Site Plan for 61 units is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall comply with the conditions imposed by the ERC. City Light Apartments SA-087-89 March 27, 1990 , Page 7 2. ` The applicant should work with staff to alter the parking stall arrangements nearest the northern driveway to eliminate or minimize unsafe manuevering at the top of the driveway. 3. The landscape and screening setbacks on the north and south shall remain subject to planning staff approval. 4. The applicant shall work with the planning staff to assure that the appropriate landscape materials are planted near the buildings to provide emergency equipment access and to provide safe sight distances near parking stalls and entry driveways. All landscaping shall be bonded with a $5,000 performance bond, or similar instrument. 5. The fencing shall be subject to approval of the planning staff. 6. Roadway improvements shall be installed prior to occupancy. This condition shall not be altered, nor shall improvements along this corridor be further delayed. 7. The applicant shall add pedestrian walkways on the site, and connecting the site with Benson Road. Any sidewalk shall provide a reasonable grade that can accommodate people in business attire, or the elderly, and shall be subject to staff approval. 8. Staff and the applicant shall,work together to'provide a pedestrian passage through the subject site, or adjacent site, to safely accommodate-both adults and children who wish to reach the school properties to the east. 9. The applicant shall provide an area near the mail boxes for casual congregation and socializing. 10. Storm drainage requirements shall be subject to review and approval of the Zublic Works Department. _ 11. Driveway grade shall be subject to city standards and shall be subject to .review and approval of staff to assure safe access to both the site and Benson Road. ORDERED THIS 27th day of March, 1990. al-kj6 VONAAANr.... FRED J. KA MAN HEARING EXAMINER TRANSMITTED THIS 27th day of March, 1990 to the parties of record: Mel Easter Johnson Braund Design Group 130 Andover Park East, Suite 301 Seattle, WA 98188 George Post 1122 South 27th Place Renton, WA 98055 • Donald Baer 918 East Laurel Kent, WA 98031 TRANSMITTED THIS 27th day of March, 1990 to the following: Mayor Earl Clymer _Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator Lynn A. Guttmann, Public Works Director Members, Renton Planning Commission Ken Nyberg, Community Development Director Glen Gordon, Fire Marshal Larry M. Springer, Planning Manager Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Ronald Nelson, Building Director Traffic Engineering Division Brent McFall, Administrative Assistant Kim Scattarella,,Engineering Specialist Valley Daily News r , J i ) • City Light Apartments SA-087-89 March 27, '1990 Page 8 Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 15 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 P.M. April 10, 1990. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision: This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 16, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of $75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning p,ending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. • The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. 1 L 1 � h • DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED MITIGATION MEASURES PROJECT: City Light Apartments PROPONENT: North Bay Development Corporation Melvin Easter, Johnson Braund Design • ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF-087-89 APPLICATION NUMBER: SA-087-89 • DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 61 unit apartment complex to be located on a vacant 3 . 3 acre. R-3 , Multi-Family Residential, zoned parcel . (Note: Density level has been adjusted for greenbelt area located on the site. ) LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: East side of Benson Road between Puget Drive and South 26th Street across from Victoria Hills apartment complex. RECOMMENDATIONS : The Environmental Review Committee • issued a Determination of Non- Significance-Mitigated with the following conditions: 1)' That the applicant refrain from cutting any trees until" the . site plan (including the landscaping plan and tree plan) for the proposed development is approved by the City to mitigate impacts to the natural environment; 2) That the applicant be required to provide a traffic mitigation plan which includes off-site improvements adjacent to the site, the retention of the right-of-way easement on Benson Road, and a fair share contribution to regional improvements (including, but not limited to signalization of the Benson Road/S .E. 31st Street intersection) . This plan is subject to approval by the Traffic Engineering Division in advance of the issuance of site preparation/building permits; 3) That the applicant be required to provide insulation to limit interior ambient noise in living units and indoor recreation areas to 45 dBA; 4) That the applicant be required to provide a plan for screening at all boundaries of the site, utilizing six foot high standard wood fencing on the north, south and eastern boundaries, and wood fencing, rockeries or a brick/masonry wall on Benson Road to provide mitigation of light, glare and some noise from the abutting roadway and nearby land uses, as well as to provide site definition which is valuable for personal safety and crime prevention. Specific plans should be subject to approval by the Planning Division and the Public Works Department in conjunction with site plan review. ' 'Mitigation Measures Page 2 5) That the applicant be required to provide a plan for a storm drainage management system (including a minimum 25 year storage/5 year release plan [with detention/retention] , oil/water separation, and biofiltration) will be required to be provided, subject to approval by the Public Works Department, in advance of the issuance of site preparation/building permits. 6) That the applicant be required to provide a construction management plan including: a) an erosion control plan, accompanied by an agreement to confine construction activities which might result in erosion to the period from May 1st to September 1st, and a plan to hydroseed permeable areas on the site by September 15th -- if the applicant wishes to undertake construction activities during other periods in the year, advance permission must be obtained from the Public Works Department, jand a certified soils engineer must be on site at all times when work is underway; b) a plan for wheel- washing of construction trucks prior to departure from the site; c) a plan for periodic watering down of the site to control dust; d) a plan for hauling hours and routes to control traffic impacts; e) a plan for construction hours to mitigate noise impacts ; and f) a renewable street clean-up bond in the amount of $2 , 000. 00 . These plans are subject to approval by the Public Works Department, Fire Prevention Bureau, Police Department and Planning Division, prior to the issuance of site preparation permits. 7 . That the applicant provide a voluntary contribution of $10, 675 . 00 ($175 . 00 x 61 units) to mitigate. off-site recreation impacts . Note #1: At the time of site plan approval, the following recommendations are likely to be made, including, but not limited to requests for: 1) construction of fire equipment access links to structures; 2) changes to landscaping to provide consistency in plantings throughout the site; 3) changes to location of plantings to ensure adequate sight-distance for vehicle/pedestrian traffic; 4) landscaping maintenance bond; 5) fencing for the children's play area; 6) plans for improved exterior illumination; 7) plans for improved signage; 8) plans for pedestrian linkage to Benson Road; 9) revisions to parking plan to increase safety of ingress/egress to parking spaces on the south side of the north driveway to the site; 10) addition of on- site amenities (congregate areas) ; 11) approved plans for rockeries and/or retention walls (heights, materials, setbacks, etc. ) ; 12) approved plans for relocation of utilities easements and for service systems ; 13) extraordinary services bonding; 14) a management operations plan; 15) a plan for de-icing of driveways to reduce likelihood of collisions; and 16) relocation of covered carports to the eastern-most row of parking stalls. • mmdoc 1 • • — . • --- —7\ `� \I 37I. % - 1--- -- 29 . R_ 1i �, _,,�,_ ��+ - n„ - ' tj\ Rn1 — x2 ,+,,• �z2 9 z n ^� / - 1 2 3 12 • !2 • 7 • II ' . t.�' t 1+ .1 7r72C --i • • �•,� • R. �•11I :1 �� G4j • • • • �I • R ► . • •• • VI �' 4 ♦ I ♦. ♦ ► O4' • • •• -'-. -• 7/ s .' % i,4♦ c ♦ . ♦ ♦ • i \ 4‘ , ...-5%.\-e: - . _ `� TaLf30 I ;TILL ♦♦♦t•t`O` 00♦♦O♦♦♦i o♦♦ ��� 191rL5riHiGH0N ' 71ALBOI HILL PARK �►,'•♦ ♦e•# ♦••♦ ♦ �'r�' �7.♦464♦♦... ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ I,b� •oc.L ELEMENTARY t♦ A�ri♦�. ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ • SCHOOL " �-♦�r'�j..10 ♦ ♦ v ♦ O __ • ><► o'♦ ♦ o « ♦ ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ • q` •♦`'� ♦ `O�♦♦®♦♦ •♦ SPRING GLEN . 10 rs xa r+ s6Z Ir IIr as �� ♦� • ID10 ,b I I �S7r 4�' '- ♦ ♦.4�►�6�!� A ELEP/IENTARY 2 j ��r el a ., • i�a�J ♦�_O,O �f 5 'SCF1001_ i •4, � ' • ♦ t �� '�� � e� • • ': .,�, • e Q� .. l S 2J rH. 5T.1 . I IL.A1' rti♦ t "� � � ♦\ ♦4o • t4 .9, ®® '�s �6c -` sT � ,��� S `c ;`, - ♦ t s• � - ;`cTto.1.1.`-a""T".".11111, G r I * di ) • fi _ 6rirT l ' li..]' 4.' -. .' •''''' ,•�my' ee ®~t "..S`a �..Is.• :':�,,',�♦VO+.4+r ;7 I "$ d..,yT , 1 �S 1'1 n �NAi !i 2. Sq..zI . ♦1,''iv 111• �� a T •. �' ��w �'' F 4' 19 MI t `' V7. •• 4. S..I B ? .� e - 2.7 to •��"..• • ♦'1' 7. • ANL• ) -0 , s ) ' • © 4. ''4s • .;� �• ��?'11, . I �!%►. Sf ;1 ^'.51 3. % N °. ti r S L `0 i �ls \ A . • / s zb x7 .2 ,• .4 ' 1. � ♦ ` � W• _.. • zs I t S s 2: A • ' • Al. . - , • • City Lights Apartments SA-087-89 • • • APPLICANT North Bay Development Corp. TOTAL AREA 3 . 31 acres PRINCIPAL ACCESS Benson Road EXISTING ZONING R-1 • - EXISTING USE Vacant i PROPOSED USE Multi-family , apartments COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN COMMENTS Located on the east side of Benson Road between Puget • • • •Drive and South 26th Street • • • • _L_JW P J0 1 1_ J Et �L�J� L J i EI L J ' I li f r UJJ I a i Rill U Q J N • a "4 co II STATISTICS SHEET INDEX I j ;: iliNtAtoce.liellaii [11W.tMj,;APPLICANT: North Bay Development C0[poration CS COVER SHEET _ F)r633 North Mildred Suite G I'^-^-+ Tacoma,WA 98406 PI SITE PLAN " ',•`, 1 `•�( __ O r •UN yUPC •/Q III le -- --- Z 304 Main Ave. South, Suite 200 PIC SITE SECTIONS7 q---_-q----� �M�� Renton,NA 98055 ;:1•---; w f`7 (206) 271-7200 P2 EEs IT CIVIL ENGINEER: Pacific EnineD[in -,.-_ •��•TIONS --. .� _— �— ---- N (206) 235-6688 �:1_-___�� i- ._.-- ._a._ , •/ //�///// , SITE AREA: 3.21 Acres (139,621 S.F.) S SITE SURVEY C IL fe �� I I�, PROJECT SITE/I I;ynBsevr[s:n"eau (DEDICATION) 0.10 sores (<.56<S.F.) O f----__c --/ : a, [I p /// / - p EXISTING TONEw :;t �- (UNITS/ACRE): R3(25:11 Q eb- ra[x]uN UNITS ALLOWED: eo.o ,I r) CI •i! VMTORU,MµI A.AerIlemrs PROPOSED UNITS - _ l /'} ��..11 • Type A-1 (15am. Ina): 11 `t, -`SP 5,5\ t l`Cr..-v t4--�~ \ T I,�, t7 2 SF "� V/ Type -2 (Sbdrm, SDn): IR _ /y Type sF(2sar], 2ha): a �`�a a0 - �lt v 132 SF Type C (2hG;n,Sruay, 2Sa): 18 �••—• 11.Z...Q.I0 • �4?)Q-1 , w 991 BF / 6� ' A % .1- RO W .ctal Proposed units: 61 ry )• ,_V.r_ �'�,i-.Q - _ h DEC'_- .LT DENSITY �� �a �� �- /• •.� ,t,` a o O (UNITS/ACRE): 19.0 > • / i _ .�. ^� f PARKING • Resident stall,at l..� . I / _s.j, . =C.11 W _i .es nst: 61%3.Sa92 c m Guest Calla at 1/1 nit]` _Is. VICINITY MAP /1 ]clam,•soreJ ., --,- Total atolls required: 101 `� = o Q (NCI: l (standard): Ts ICeopSetl: 29 u F a H0 8 Total stalls Provided: 107 Covered Stalls LOT 2, CITY OF RE:rfOt1 SNORT PLAT SCORER 070-80 (ALSO KNOWN AS NELSONV LL Co(Carports): 53 MIDDLE SCHOOL SHORT PUT), RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8107299002, SAID LOT 2 BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: (Garages): 8 — BUILDING COMPOSITION: • PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTH QUARTER OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH. RANGE 5 EAST. WILLAMETTE M!_4IDIAOI, IN KING COUNTY,WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: Bldg, 143 6"A— ,:nits, 6"A-2"u , 6"C"units CROSS floor(living) area3C20,412 S.F. BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION:THENCE NORTH 88 Bldg. 2 5"A-1"units, 6"A-a"units, 12 "C^Units DEGREES 12'38"EAST ES S THE SOUTH LINE THEREOF))).)J FEET: NIP - THENCE NORTH 1 DEGREES 42'40" EAST 1:5.65 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF 1 unitwith rental storage lockers. BEGINNING: Gloss floor area (incl. storage) 04.400 S.F. THENCE NORTH 88 DEGREES 17'20" WEST 191.67 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF - 012go. i 8"B"c� BENSON ROAD(STATE ROAD ONG NO.ID111110 THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID EAST LIVE TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID • cross.root(living) area. 7,632 S.F. SECTION 29: THENCE NORTH 87 DEGREES 08'52" EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF SE'-':ION ` r, 29 TO A POINT WHICH IS SOUTH 87 DEGREES 08'52" WEST A DISTANCE OF • IMPERVIOUS AREA: 989.22 FEET FROM THE NORTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION: • • adq.LAecOCenta[[ THENCE SOUTH 02 DEGREES 21'53"EAST A DISTANCE OF 363.51 FEET; n • Parking, rives• THENCE SOUTH 18 DEGREES 51'39"EAST A DISTANCE OF 50.24 FEET: m • Walks: 41,295 S.F. • THENCE SOUTH 01 DEGREES 45'35^EAST A DISTANCE OF 19T.6] FEET MOP£CR L.,LESS TO A POINT WHICH BEARS SOUTH 88 DEGREES 11'20"EAST FROM THE TRUE ZV > ` TOTALS: 64,335 S.F. (459) POINT OF BEGINNING: _ THENCE NORTH 80 DEGREES 17'20" WEST :7.21 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE OPEN SPACE/ • TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; .g LANDSCAPE ACT: 1S,'^:5 B.F. (SST) EXCEPT THE NORTH 30 FEET THEREOF, LYING WITHIN ROW IAEE PIPE LINE . O J Bu!lG'_nq Setbacks: Front-30 feet RIGHT OF WAY. d Side -12 feet Rear " fee` LEGAL DESCRIPTION Building Height: Alloyed -50 feet Provided-Approx. 35 feet , C a JohnsonBraund design group, Inca architecture, landscape &planning consultants — - -G- SG•tcci� EX,S�tiC, G.-An�Ni==,NGE 9 ' • - =ENE= (T!P) G EP.S- P(2pPEFRi L-ih� Q s� 5D 24' • S 1 45'15'E 197.67' 16 51 j9 E. .� ^ "- S 1 24'53'E V 333.57' S _—-. J 1. - . i 17> • k . ' ) \" .'_- T \ � /'- _x ST.,_, ,`-G EA;01.. 1 t-r_ SAVED (T1,) } ✓ ` 1 ` I .� - ) .. f • L .��• ,� .. '= ............._.....,..:.... . ...o._..-„ )led,.• . i �•• ij -• . . � O�v�elll�i.!�. fl. OOe•jse • ���% c•C•. • . :c ' a s..•:_ - i _ `ll ��I/`�� e.r gam,ice `sue ���•• �or*ie0 ivro, .9Ay iir.alwa 1lb ••.-j? _- ' 'O', I 1 1 . \• _ ,• � •� (1; (•• •�O ��*P...Q '%_F-e..�r•" 1 0." \ e t I I I I II I - L=----- - i 1 • _ •�.E (-• �.00 •-!#.4 ;- I I 1 % • it T� co I .1 i 1 :Y , IF > o �. e t • t I __,_..1 a��� - ' S rt---- ! r_l._--1 a ;,r .1 i I o e ° �y a c �'� - _- - ' of I I 1 I o0e t �i� 1 \1 •L �= Kgr.,pV=,�(.....!\ t L1 iCf�i°1�°. - e e $°ro`1�!bL a • ee.r I .. • L r �j y �o 1` a° 1 •mil 'o e a °✓'O O�Or �O — „ NI j .. fi e° 1 Or►� p1� o� e� P�de� ��4F11 C: "�) {� CD o l.^ott•oo-ena l 4 �. O I O -'t \ d 04 O • o • Z • t \ ° " W pg. '"'. '.:�i� ?.. lr, AT10 XF•• RECRE �, 1' 4. I.� O. . CENTER OI '" CC .� ff. ..I. � a 1 O U .:. all I Q —hC7 1 ;�".Ctr,-��••��� �� � f. `00� .may -- -•.•040,;:::. .1..,,,,,:.: �- - ~���- �� • 1 . um • ;ie . Pee _ H = , 0 i-6911 . ......:.,•• ....,...........s..... „elm >_ i, ,,, A '---- �. {; /`/�� . SiPiir: ;-,4,10 PLANT LIST .._ _- - �.i`'`'��; ;��' n. • O`1 p6 -SYMBOL' iESSRPPTION EFTS - B EXISTING TREES TO BE SAVED AS VOTED SHALL ACCENT TREES 8•_g• To%• �� d � . D (SR 515) //ff� '� �� a �� N RSA A:ALDER !( • 1� VINE MAPLE,TREE, MAR HORNBEAM, �� 11 / BENS O T: FIR STRAWBERRY STRAHBERRY TPE£, MAGNOLIA MAPLE ' C:COTTONWOOD SHRUBS 15.-18•dile r 1 We:" Y�+ SHADE TREES 2•CAL �,`J NA%LEAi PRSVET, ESCALLOIIIA, UL'REL, 1 �J HEAVEVL'!BAMBOO. ARBORVITAE. i6 - KORWAY MAPLE, SHEETGUH, SCARLET OAK, RHODODENDRON, BARBERRY,OREGON m T • .`,v�.(, GRAPE,JA^AWES£HOLLY, SKINCIIA, }) 2A 21\�' -}- IANppN PUN£TRE£ I VIBURNUM '31 95 FLOWERING AND ACCENT TREES 1-1/2.CAL- 1 �/ /.ARNSTROVG MAPLE, EUROPEAN BIRCH, GAOUNDCOVLRS 4.ppT - �� LANDSCAPE PLAN \_ N PELT NCXERR 'IIONEV IDNSTFIAW£RIVG SpIGiNGEN JUNIPER, DHARFHPERININKLEESP - •- NIA ----�-J KINIIICKINNICK EVERGREEN TREES 6'-0• 7`• _ . `� RKIN-L '":✓-C. t- J, ANNUALS/PERENNIALS 6. POT ._____—_._ 0 AUSTRIA.!PINE, HESTEAtI RED CEDAR, • CEODAR CEDAR,SCOTC4 PINE PARKING LOT LANDSCAPING PARKING LOT AREA: 2 8,951 S.F. PARKING DOT LANDSCAPING REQUIRED: 1,450 S.F. -12 PARKING LOT LANDSCAPING PROVIDED: 1,508 S.F. ID II(JII • - _ __-__ JohnsonBraund design group, inc. architecture. lanoscape & planning consultants • 1- . s -- , . R41. _ p oX #., Ni..: :. '`kAl . .1... , ,..,. .4. .0 :. _... , • 1, . '-/ . ti, 11) • \\:_j„, —I —I 110.11141. 1,1)177 n.ai:1 'n .'vim ,. i � i t 1 < 0 t,1 I 6;0 t'�"" I / co G1 J;�D 0 0 �l }, , . I p4 1L s p .. 1a \wl( ri'l I I . Alle . " . 1Vii: ••T I7g ll` : :-ll f i 1 i.k e . • cn )( i • • w �AR�< {ice i up 11, • -t -. \ , .-9 ;.� C �i��.,• P�P TY —1 '' Z >a .. r�l 0PP > 1 r . y ?1�;r I /PPoPBfkT 1 IA -- ,;' '�L-IN gill gr ip c �1 m • 1L� W 7 a 0 w CD R. w EP � 7 n Greg L.Allwine. AIA n STATE 0E Protect No 69-62 CITY LIGHTS APARTMENTS RENTON. WA. Y "'"°'°" ' REGISTERED �-----�FT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 1 1 Drawn by W FOR: NORTH DAY DEVELOPMENT COPPOPATION C Issue dare O-rb-eS 633 N.MILORED, SUITE'G' C ^ NELVIN R.EASTER w (/v(^)J\ Latest rev TACOMA, NA 90A06 (206) 565-9�00 CERTiriC.�TE ro ne .I 30 anclover park a, suite 301 Seattle, wa. 98188 (206) 431-7960 _ Mel Easter, ASLA i. . i I I ..: I 1 1 e-P-o" i . 1 0 0 . i. • t Of.',. 6•".7_,MA P.. i < 1 --7—' 11 I 20°,<CO' - - 1 < \ \ '//:' . • • .. Livtn5 ; (0% • .T. ty.„; . /0— i i 1.---_,-,---------10 / I- 0 • . ED, u..1 1 i , cil) .1*E=ii e •Iimi.. fri ! . . El -i- . ,....._,. Pi ni n I ar. . , ---) i ; I -0$12' . I • • lilt ', j<;irchlrk. 3 ___ r.... V) .1 .., . , c. cv I 1 e,Giroon't 11,,144 (--- II ,_ ::___ .0_0 I . inv.: , =•. , , . • __ ..,+ , Sfuiy_ • 14,4 1 •• . o o c., ,-- . UNIT TYPE A-2 ° . -L_' i 1:2 it ..._ 1 BEDROOM/ 1 BATH , - mj -- .1---r---1 cs.. IS WHY'.> 1 I Li_y I I 1 0.7°>(£3 -.6'..--1 .:1: .41s44-f Pea- - G5 @F. ;,,11, 1_, _1 F•0 0 _n - To-1 -1,*),G4 Sr - 2G •F• IX-- 11.111 EP' ail r> .)-- ---, _ , \J _ . _ - — 1.110 1.Xtr 0 0 0 . • • ! C.. ri- ---1 .:1---- LOC'i \-------, .„r. n . e,,,._JE.‘_ \ 1 . _ __ IT T _ 0 Fr-, 1 1 rmlrY _Li , . . '-1111111.1111. • ; Ma-ste.-.- il• i-- g cd Z ; ILI • 1-1 1 x :.,',. 0,c) :A®1 A4 I —• : + ". , cc .T. rt c xll ••'-' L11, - ' IDE —-4- 1 : I I •• • . : -/.0')-(-/;3';-- 1.12, sr,hilf, —:,_,- mg Ki+Aial 0 .... 0 c\J t..2..._, .?•41,41r2.q, . ki Ir _ 1 , .7? em-ry ,...,..._ o-4•,. 1 • •/\ ^ _ I - s.. - . > , I >- §E 11 as • . '- H C .- RS - . E P Valroorn -I ) 0 1 v- • TaNg - 1:! -in 00 —0 , .e .' . ... a [—I 00 waree c , . . ‘... ,-4. 1 i I \ 1 • . •. r i. i ".• 11 1 UNIT TYPE A-1 . . UNIT TYPE C ..'; ...." ' ,f-: •-• , "0 ' ..'.- 1.BEDROOM/ 1 BATH 2 BEDROOM/ 2 BATH W/STUDY , uno- - 1 4452 44-- Unfi- - -11".1. 14 0 •A.: ...-. . • peo_ - Go 5,4. pe4- - Go.4.-F. 1 :„ -t- •1, . . ' l'ora•36 - to ‘,.-C. • • -ir,rag e: - to 4..f. I ., • • , . . . , __. .InhnqnnRraunri (-lesion amun_ inc. rr.hiter.tiirp lanciscaoe & olannina consultants . . . . . . 3D , \ DARY A \ i TDOGAHIC SjRV - Y A PORTION OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M. CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON • . • • • . ' ----•=me::=M=k z SCALE: 1"---20' ;•:=7'.';''r.,.:IL .„-----''"--;-"....;'': . :-;.- .- ,... 1_47. 71___---,-----;,-.—.7. ____.---- S 1 1 ;:_€.2f"._L'-'-'L =---------i6;;=----- .,. . 1Ne I id, „--•," A,...,.•...' ...---,91-1- , P---._ '---0---",--" _ -— -_-_- -.. _.- — -•. _ 17:,...,.-.7-----_-.- . ---.5 - •-'S 2 . •1. .'"------ .---'—'----'-----.----..---1453 E 333.57' ----- ----1 I-4;17— - :::----- -- —-- ----_.---..=---, — ---- :-. ---- - -- --.-- - - \ P\ \\\\ --------7-----7---crt- ___:2_-'cr- - --2._ -_....=-_-----•- „7._,.- _ „ \ ,,,,,_,,p -- .-- ---- --, ----- _ ----- ,._sC--\__ ____ _ ----- ---. -----, p\\\\,\ '', '".• -3.------,--.'--7---.----____ I,-_-•'-'- T:„.._pi. LEGEND ,.____. --- ------:"__- — — — af— ------ S)----- - I— ---..\._. _ ----__P — — — — •-•D0.30,PY -' . __ ___--____, .... . 1 ,--,, -0- ----7, ----. --____ N,N,....,", ".... --——-,.,"."--•'______,\-- --- ... , ___.0_Q___ ___ __________:_ __ . .„ra ..,. .-..., • YOKE L. ----- °'-' -1-ril''----- j•-?±--------- ----' -.13-.11(I -..'- ..F____ — —N - -- —--P- .."-,... s-- -... ,:,...-•__- :/ ----- :-- — — — cr."- .---- _ -• ---- --s) ---,c, I ....--___ —_ 0 1.1010DS WE •-•____ , . 1.-,....._ / The''''_, — , -- , -7---- ---...., ._,...._p_,,--- ------- -,_ ./.. 1.6--- ., .%.e '. ,------ • ' ''''''..----C)./7. 7. ' -E-----At• ';Wriib'..r e" " -1-rt---/,--:\ .5--< --, , 0---. PC.--•------- ELLE CS ESE., a PANTE°arta.. ei__ 0'4IP p, 0•,'. ,-,Z Zs) A„, , ---...._„ t_.:_____.s,. , o• . ,......E _____, POrprLIDET POLE - 0 E.' 1\I ---- --.- -"------- .--Sa?zri,Th-r-- "41;'7.':.n.,:.-:.;'e P -.' --S1- -- ----_____ -- --''''-0•-' . . .-• ..-- c,' 96‘2)1)1) 1 I '' A.-I I I 6,,-- N,„,, - ____ --_, ----,. o -..p•-•-•_____ __ '"'-,.ii -. -!------- ___-- COP/Dai L. ,..• 0 0''.. , ____ ______ - . LUARO POST 0 \ ..... 0'.... Pa -----------------------.---->.."-T.-'...'---..._... •••-_..__..."-----:.. . • T /VC13 ---,-.. -------. i --- '-`,., s'"---•-. - ,r- ---.,,,,,,, v ,,. N\N". . w . ........... ;.4___•-..,„..., Q.37/_--- „,..p...,, , 3,'.ef2j1 I,i ;Y,r°',\;":‘:.CO7 0.8o .---- --"' 0 0 —. _---- ----- -`---._ ---)a• P 0 ----._ 0") .... • ,...r,"' s%.• •-•••--. 20.ROADWAY.UMW,AND SLOPE ESP 1..RENTON S.P.Aill TT.._ ._.1\N\ ‘..' la .----- -----'0°(-7.......,.r-•--- 1\\ \ \ \ .--- as rir -- i-T-5313- --------Y-T - • --,--2 -7,11/X( (\ \\ \\. 1. \_____----------___ , I \ --------= ____ •;':.7, c ..----- ------- ..' ), . ----, c------, • . . ..... ...— —....." • ------------ -...._ CoY , ' y I ql\k \\ \ •- `.-"---.\- ."---------- ------7-_-_---".-'" .11 IS.....1) •4' ------- ..... - L. - - I ...- ------ _______--,-_:.---...,----- , ,-•_.--- / '.. ' 1--____ .....,..._:-....,--.... \ I •--' "'---,, ...'- ------ ,-2-.rillis(\ .,.\ ' ----.-------.------- .----...--::::------ ..--...--..-..--"" LLI,:::::: 3, ...- iprOPID (S 1\TE HtGHWAY<1, I • -----' ,---- - 1---- Be \ -- ___,-- --... --(7,-.52,...),,, __ _-:-_-_--- --/-;.1-* ___,-- • \ .--•;....,-, • J.- ---,..,..---•-------: .... i'.;'T";e"7.-lriAX• . • ..• -----;'" \..,..•••••-- ... . . --____ --- - .•,....:41,--g. -- :-••• , . .. -__ .____ • , __- -..,- . ... ..........;"---- 1 --:i.-".„°:-.`iii:: : (*V'k. ::i :i :,.-, :.iiii: .... ..- - ,•';;,r...- -,..:4,. -:-.-.:.. ,•-•,•;.•-• ---”,:-Lv-- --C -- •• A , ...).C>. ., . . ._ • ......---- ...,...-z1v......E..'' . Q. . .,•• \t‘Os L ::: ...s.,. .7t".•.-;, .. . . \ -::.::7'LL7',`",.:=, • '4?::' -..:-..., N CITY LIGHTS APARTMENTS KICK ". 3014 Barghausen . (0, NM.PT MVELCAOIT CL.K.11. Consulting Engineers Inc. 633 r. WILD..WM•6.• • OCC.k.. 9.06 12063 50-9403 1 1 Land Planning.Survey&Engineering Spacialists • , . I,. • . I-1 I! I 1 r - ,-.......-...-... ..1= I . .• i — • •=1/1=0 • ...NNISM .. — • • , • -- -: 7-----. •• ;TA- -.- mrt--.- -,im -- -1--== • I, -• _ _— --,-11j---• --_- .... ._.,_,_,.,E,_---k._k___••_-•-=_-E__,__-Z_--L...77_--..___--_=_... ,,I --7: . ,=__---_.,-_.,.=_:P..-:=.,-,y,..•.-.•.,•-.--'i-•...:n.i1=,.:.:!42..,,.=:_.-_'.-!.1--;1-,...-,=M__===_-!=----_-.7.-...--.-._..,',,°,l_1_IiMt_-.1-_.p. r,,i.i.,'..'.,,_„:,,',..s..o,,.-1M,w.,,..1_B,,,.k..n..i,'isP i.I.fi,,_11aII.1...,,1,,,!,,7.==_•,._-•_=._-_—.-__---.........--:mh,•"m.o..=,.?v_.r';A,'r'1i.-,i,•.•,=—1.-.,N„..4,i„?ui,,:,.M1m1.I._•,_.-.—.._.,..-.==__-.___..,.•'...'r,mm=-._-.-=---i..-•,_'.;_ Ea —.--..=._-.-m_=L - M - .__- Mm _= ii = _ m-_-I_-- _ <:."r77a1.CC i .- • . —G,44--5.•, . • . r -- i ";7; -,rIl.a.. t. .-M,a1 I,,''_ !-..m--l111.11•, :: . . L.E .' •--• nM _ - 111.11.- . - - , , - A M , . , l / Fi M , 1 - -i EAST ELEVATION .3201-DI• 5445 " ai • 1 i i — yb - , , TI V . _ . _ .WEST ELEVAON • 1. i- i cs: ,, i-f..i.,e,, vb,••••1'--on “") • C4) CV . . •••• i tO _ ,-... ne-i-/-t.rt.ot/c4- e ccvm o I —-4 - E- Corirollog 41-in-Jca.• c1-1 5:12 Ra2e prv,44 ......__, •..___. I... .-.-- - . 7 - ,.. __ • • CV - -. -- — -.--- 2Ao F-aoc.o.1-1/cc)4-m4Uoti6 4u-rim • . E 4#4&,... .-.— CV .4 . '-..--. ..---------- .-7.--•-r-.----,---" 1: AUlHiNtk4 hz1440/tZtel..a Q.,,,,Lco AkkalAS 4, 1,,l• Wiblv00 lkit1 • • 11. I • . .4( =wow. - r .:__..•_-7:.•-_- ----77,----.-.:,-. 77-.--.-r.arf_.:.-,--::__;—L. ,:z.,1 -==--- lin-111111=1111 elk' - 6,' exact.•Aom.lor .1111111111re -11-111.011113WitlE—.---=--=.=IMMI.E,M.1 :---_-_, =L.__ -1--z--:- --------=:. . -i _ ,..._1=---• ,-..-.a. -----1--__:=::•_' , • - r ,•. —' ;: --- _ ...rin--- i•-- ,W--7=---_-___=- IN .____,... - . ..--. ,,. .,..., -E_---=--_..- • ,r) co w•i.rem eXtt..( Det1C, MM. IMI ...11111111111111— 111....:f.:.-t-='--,==: -----MilL";1411'. ..-;.;t . 7ir:7- 1 MET/A. FiPERPIL- 4::==l1MINNIA= I =I 1 1 . U.I I .,- --•Mn =-;-::;.-..-.; --" " .. . ____.= 17g. sii--,limi• --------------- x 0 , . i 111. Hill_ . . .a--,: - .....,_-5-_ . i ——--- --- • -P .i... ...n=i= IMMI_ 7-E q•-- #MMEliMli'l 0.• ' Q.. 1. 0 F11410‘.12,44,7 P c\J i I END ELEVATION •_MIL,t2IN 4.i:,. .. 'WEST ELEVATION • It..1 I 1.00,16, 1 4 , e,Jil..01H6 ih-.12- . 1,11LIP42,w/P-P--6, e.,,L, , /4,P ILO" `•=-c",--a* Ye;.1...' 1 L 0 . . . . ammom MI c- - -..... - .... . pii__.,„-- --„.., -- al = k=•: . ,m 1-4 '..7. LtJ : • ..P. C.4) E I .. .. ..--:- =. ".-- --- .1" ..-7- - • CO lia„ .""" I Wiggil lilt .1 ,I ir — 7.• iiiviEl_cir..= • i ,;iim':. i•-•••• •=•••• .--.. =--,..--_-- I*11••‘ :_-,-.._ -----p. a ii,-I___ lisim im ... _ _ _ _ -. ,.....„..„,.__ _....„, • :..„, _,..„.E.,__. ,01.1 ,,,,i,., Ili IllIaLTAI 4k.;. IMF . ..= 1 ---,—op= =.•-:•:: i .i:".• ' -.77 NMI i _=..---:71-- - 1E7,- -i-A711 4.747...Z: l'itil"-K.7-------'171.:i ,• -i ,<' 1.--I, .1Elii . ______ .:. _...._,,_ 5IM— ' "--—' 1"' iL 1.11r=' - ----'"''z i.,-- -:';'=______•,. Ili '1E-2 -1 - ....1.6t ,,og csc,_..z. Ilt- -.....dell I (tr A •. ,, .. . °IN WII___L,W.':::. 1 1111' , ,Witil, • '-..__I., .- -41 II ......41.1111111111 ../.1•=*' -:..1.iM...... 9__ •d • e • - • .- r_,- -13 - • • -.-I" 1 -- - 1-1-1-- i i 1-=--II _ i I • '., ,• 4 .:-A-1 3 . -• . . 1_, % i •;•,: ',4•,. END ELEVATION • •i)I L•01H6•0 1,(2, 4'b EAST (ENTRY) ELEVATION • 13U11.4211-4. .1 4 , e,u1L-rDIN67 4-2_ 11/111.-1/°42-.,,,AKE-6.1a.- .r1/41"-W-A-taC) . I •:,'?::, q;;•: 011 va.6.1. . re:, ,if-c,' . ., ,•-:- •,-i!--.? 1- • . . ! 1. -- JohnsonBraund design group., inc. architecture, landscape &planning consultants __ -- pr '1• RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON MAR 15 1990 CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER MEMORANDUM DATE: March 15, 1990 TO: Fred Kaufman, Hearing Examiner FROM: Lynn Guttmann, Public Works Director IV O 1'i12- STAFF CONTACT: Kim Scattarella, Stormwater Engineering Specialist SUBJECT: CLARIFICATION OF RECOMMENDATION OF DETENTION REQUIREMENTS FOR CITY LIGHTS The Public Works Dept. previously approved the City Lights SEPA DNS review using the Y-W design for Detention requirements. The Y-W Detention design method remains viable, but the newly approved King County Surface Water Design Manual standards (pending approval by Renton City Council) requires the use of the SCS Hydrograph method. The SCS Hydrograph is a more conservative method to use for determination of detention storage, than the Y-W method. The SCS Hydrograph would require from 50-75% more storage. In light of the recent floods, this is a prudent requirement. If possible, at this stage of the review process, we would prefer the SCS Hydrograph method be used in the final design of City Lights Apartments. However, if you do not support this change, we would still recommend in favor of this project. cc: Lenora Blauman, Senior Planner Dick Anderson, Utility Systems Mgr. /� - �efl PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENroN CITY OF RENTON TRANSPORTATION DIVISION ;1r, 0 1990 MEMORANDUM lec DATE: March 8, 1990 TO: Leonara Blauman, Community Development Department FROM: Clinton E. MorganC,STransportation Systems SUBJECT: Driveway Street Approach/City Light Vehicles entering and/or leaving driveways which have abrupt changes in grade must travel at extremely low speeds. For those entering, the possibility of rear end collisions on the public street is greatly increased. Exiting vehicles must wait for larger gaps in traffic, and with ice conditions has the hazard of skidding into the street when on a slope. Therefore, the following guidelines should be applied as closely as possible for the driveway design: 1. The driveway approach to the street should be as flat as possible, but should not exceed 7% for the first 40 feet from face of curb. 2. Driveway grade changes should be limited if possible to 3% but not greater than 6%. 3 . It is desirable for the driveway to slope upward from the gutter line on a straight slope when possible. 4 . Driveway grades beyond the approach and above 8% will need to apply for a variance and should not exceed 15% which is the limit by ordinance. . 5. The driveway approach to the street should have transferal grooves to reduce the hazards of ice on the approach section when the driveway beyond the approach section exceeds a grade change of 3%. CEM:ps CEM302 • • . . • • . • • • • . . . . • • . • • • , . • • • C.7 / / k 0/ e) ef , 15PW ,7eiieS :/5 ,..7) C) • . . • ---- • s 6 _ - - • n e-sc-rxe, s-e CD -2) 5 / . • ..• . • • • • • •:. • .... ...... . . . .. -:C ::: : > o.F. N :: is :: :; «< >` < : : > .:;.>;:.:. .;:: :<:::: :: ::: :: :: ::;<::::: :::::: CURRENT':>: •:.•:.:.::::..::.:.::::.::...::..::....:....:..::::..............._••••.. ...... . .... .L••,NN:ANC:»T�IVTS:rtJN::::::::::::: :> : ::::: : :: :::;::.::;::: :.„._ .:... : .: :iii:.: P.FIDAv.i:ir � ` SERV.ICE 3.Y•: On the rtail day of M 1--) , 19 , I deposited in the mails of the United Stat s a sealed envelope containing }\: (---; -v-)c -e kart 1 .1 documents. This information was sent to: . Name Representing Il e.,I u n ��. P_r c-cln n C��ra vJ ci n p I-e-sll�. Ciro lainn es, 1(..ii----Y7-1Vz_ rc---m_nc-_,\ -0\7 \01-0_3(- co_x-Y\C-. (1 IA--7 L3Q10 f • (Signature of Sender) c re, __ k . T,,.„Qr. Subscribed and sworn to me this -2 -77-1 day of /1 - fh4 , 19Q0 . / (9-1. €4, e, /, No Vy Public in and for the State of Washington residing at DA,,` r therein. : :I:iRr ec t a me:: ........... ........... ........ .:::..::::.:::::::::..:::::::::.:: .... ... . .... .e c.t COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING APPLICANT: North Bay Development Corporation Melvin Easter, Johnson Braund Design Group ' FILE NUMBER: ECF; SA-087-89 LOCATION: East side of Benson Road between Puget Drive and South 26 Street across from. Victoria Hills apartment complex. A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: . Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 61 unit apartment complex to be located on a vacant 3 . 3 acre parcel. The property is zoned R-3 , Medium Density, Multi-Family Residential. B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record: Renton School District 2 . Applicant: North Bay Development Corporation Melvin Easter, Johnson Braund Design Group, Inc. 3 . Existing Zoning: Medium Density Multi-Family Residential (R-3) 4 . Existing Zoning in the Area: Single-Family Residential (R-1) ; Medium Density Multi-Family (R-3) ; High Density Multi-Family (R-4) ; and General Use (G- 1) . 5. Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Medium Density Multi-Family Residential Use and Greenbelt. 6. Size of Property: 3 . 3 acres 7 . Access: Benson Road South 8 . Land Use: Vacant land 9. Neighborhood Characteristics: North: Multi-family residences East: Fred Nelson Junior High; Springbrook Elementary South: Presbyterian Church West: Multi-family residences in existence and single-family • residences under construction. C. HISTORICAL/BACKGROUND: Action .. File - Ordinance Date PRELIMINARY REPORT TO T HEARING EXAMINER .PRELIMINARY Apartments PUBLIC HEARING March 13 , 1990 Page 2 Initial Annexation. N/A 1909 9-20-61 'Rezone to R-3 R-048-80 3468 9-15-80 D. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1. Utilities a. Water: An eight inch water main runs along Benson Road South. b. Sewer: An eight inch sanitary sewer runs along Benson Road South. c. Storm Water Drainage: Storm water draining from the subject site empties into an eighteen inch culvert on Benson Road South, flows approximately 200 feet to the west, and enters a twenty-one inch culvert draining to the south. 2 . Fire Protection: Provided by the City of Renton as per ordinance requirements. 3 . Transit: Metro routes 145, 148 , and 155 run along South Puget Drive. Metro route 155 also runs along S.E. 176 Street. 4 . Schools: a. Elementary Schools: Cascade Elementary School is approximately one mile east of the subject site. (Spring Glen Elementary School which is immediately east of the site is being utilized by the Kent School District) . b. Middle Schools: Nelson Middle School adjoins the subject site on the east. ' c. High Schools: Renton High School is approximately one and one-half miles northwest of the subject site. 5 . Recreation: Nelson Middle School is adjacent to the subject site on the east. Talbot Hill Park is approximately one mile west of the subject site. Philip Arnold Park is approximately one and' one-half miles northeast of the subject site. E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1. Section 4-31-8A, R-3 Residence District. 2 . Section 4-31-33 , Site Plan Review. 3 . Section 4-31-35, Greenbelt Regulations. 4 . Section 4-31-34 Landscaping Ordinance. 5 . Section 4-14, Parking and Loading Ordinance. F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT: 1. Southeast Renton Plan, City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium, 1986 (pgs. 51-54) . 2 . Residential Goal, City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium, 1986 (pgs. 14-16) . 3 . Greenbelt Policies, City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium, 1986 (pg. 30) . • .PRELIMINARY REPORT TO T HEARING EXAMINER City Lights Apartments PUBLIC HEARING" March 13 , 1990 . Page 3 G. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1. The proponent, John Miller/Johnson Braund,, has request site plan approval to develop a 61 unit multi-family residential complex on a vacant 3 . 3 acre parcel, zoned R-3 , for Medium Density Multi-Family use. All development is proposed for the western portion of the site, which is sloped from 10% to 25%; the eastern portion which is. sloped from 30% to 40% and hosts considerable native vegetation and underground springs, is to be retained essentially in its natural state. . (Under the Zoning Ordinance, property designated R-3 is generally permitted to be developed at a maximum density of 25 units to the acre; because of the sloped area and greenbelt designation on the eastern portion of the site, the Greenbelt Ordinance calls for a density reduction which would permit a maximum of 70 units -- or 21 units to the acre -- on the site. The proponent proposes to develop this site with 61 units [approximately 19 units to the acre] , which is well within allowable limits. ) "City. Lights" is proposed to include four discrete residential structures and a recreation center (with indoor and outdoor facilities) , 107. parking spaces (covered and uncovered outdoor. stalls and garages) , and service areas. Proposed Buildings "1" , "2" and "3" are 2 .5 stories in height, with 17 dwelling units in Building "A" and 18 dwelling units in Buildings "B" and "C" , including one bedroom and two bedroom apartment. Proposed Building "4" is two stories in height over ground-level garages; it has eight units, all of which have two bedrooms. The development, including residential, and recreation structures, has been proposed to include cedar siding and fascia trim, double-glazed aluminum trimmed windows, and hipped composition roofing. The development includes a recreation center at the center of the site with indoor and outdoor passive/active recreation opportunities. In addition, there is an outdoor seating area on the southern portion of the site and an outdoor basketball court on the northeast section of the site. 2 . Pursuant to the. City of Renton's Environmental Review Ordinance and SEPA' (RCW 43 .21.C. , 1971, as amended) , a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated, was issued for the subject proposal on November 1, 1989, with the following conditions: a) That the applicant refrain from cutting any trees until the site plan (including the landscaping plan and tree plan) for the proposed development is approved by the City to mitigate impacts to the natural environment; b) That the applicant be required to provide a traffic • mitigation plan which includes off-site improvements adjacent to the site, the retention of the right-of-way easement on Benson Road, and a fair share contribution to regional improvements (including, but not limited to signalization of the Benson Road/S.E. 31st Street intersection) . This plan is subject to approval by the Traffic Engineering Division in ' advance of the issuance of site preparation/building permits; c) That the applicant be required to provide insulation to limit interior ambient noise in living units and indoor recreation areas to 45 dBA; PRELIMINARY REPORT TO T .HEARING EXAMINER City Lights Apartments PUBLIC HEARING March 13 , 1990 Page 4 d) That the applicant be required to provide a plan for screening at all boundaries of the site, utilizing six foot high standard wood fencing. on the north, south and eastern boundaries, and wood fencing, rockeries or a brick/masonry wall on Benson Road. to provide mitigation of light, glare and some noise from the abutting roadway and nearby land uses, as well as to provide site definition which is valuable for personal safety and crime prevention. Specific plans should be subject to approval by the Planning Division and the Public Works Department in conjunction with site plan review. e) That the applicant be required to provide a plan for a storm drainage management system (including a minimum 25 year storage/5 year release plan [with detention/retention] , oil/water separation, and biofiltration) will be required to be provided, subject to approval by the Public Works Department, in advance of the issuance of site preparation/building permits. f) That the applicant be required to provide a construction management plan including: a) an erosion control plan, accompanied by an agreement to confine construction activities which might result in erosion to the period from May 1st to September 1st, and a plan to hydroseed permeable areas on the site by September 15th -- if the applicant wishes to undertake construction activities during other periods in the year, advance permission must be obtained from the Public Works Department, and a certified soils engineer must be on site at all times when work is underway; b) a plan for wheel-washing of construction trucks prior to departure from the site; c) a plan for periodic watering down of the site to control dust; d) a plan for hauling hours and routes to control traffic impacts; e) a plan for construction hours to mitigate noise impacts; and f) a renewable street clean-up bond in the amount of $2 , 000. 00. These plans are subject to approval by the Public Works Department, Fire Prevention Bureau, Police Department and Planning Division, prior to the issuance of site preparation permits. g) That the applicant provide a voluntary contribution of $10, 675. 00 ($175. 00 x 61 units) to mitigate off-site recreation impacts. 3 . Various City departments have commented upon the proposed development. The comments are attached and discussion of those items has been incorporated into this report. 4 . SITE PLAN APPROVAL CRITERIA - Section 4-31-33 lists ten criteria that the Hearing Examiner is asked to' consider along with all other relevant information in making a decision on a Site Plan Approval application. .These include the following: a. Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan, its elements and policies; f The subject property is designated for medium density multi- family use on the Comprehensive Plan Map, as well as being consistent with Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies for Residential Development. For example, Residential Development Objective IV.A. calls for sound, viable neighborhoods to be created; Policy IV.A. 1. calls for housing densities and types to suit a variety of family sizes, life styles, and income levels; Policy IV.A.9 calls for housing alternatives to encourage a variety of choice in architectural design, physical location, and building arrangement. Policy IV.B. 3 . calls for dwellings to' be PRELIMINARY REPORT TO T HEARING EXAMINER City Lights Apartments PUBLIC HEARING March 13 , 1990 Page 6 Because the proposed development will provide new shelter in an area in which it is deemed desirable, while not eliminating any existing residential units, staff believe that City Lights will have a positive impact upon the City's housing stock. (2) Aesthetics The applicant, working with staff, has endeavored to make the proposed residential complex compatible with neighboring residential developments (e.g. Benson Condominiums, Victoria Hills) and non-residential uses (e.g. Fred Nelson School, Presbyterian Church) . Structures and service areas have been designed to be complimentary in general design and scale to those nearby uses. Similarly, structural design and siting protects view corridors from adjacent properties, allows maximum exposure to light and maintains air circulation for properties in the vicinity. Parking accommodations are located away from neighboring developments as well. The preserved sloped/vegetated area on the east portion of the site, together with recommended/proposed landscaping should provide visual and light/glare buffers to the neighboring church, school and condominiums, as well as against the abutting Benson Road. Screening (solid wood fencing or brick/masonry walls) will be required at the site periphery, also for the purpose of providing visual and light/glare barriers to neighboring properties, as well as containing sound. (3) Natural Environment The subject property includes an approximately one acre section (on the east side) which is characterized by slopes of between 30% and 40%, hosts underground springs, and is covered with native vegetation. These slopes are reported in the geotechnical study to be stable. The applicant is not seeking to build on these sloped areas, and proposes to preserve existing vegetation. The sloped areas are to be contained with retaining walls/rockeries, as approved by the Public Works Department (with respect to heights,, materials, setbacks, etc. ) . Storm drainage management systems are also to be designed in a way which preserves the sloped areas, in order to protect both the developed portion of the site and nearby public rights-of-way/private properties. d. Mitigation of impacts of the proposed site plan to the site: Potential impacts to the site also have been identified by staff in several areas (aesthetics, natural environment, traffic circulation, noise, light and glare, public services and public utilities) . Aesthetic impacts are discussed in this section. Natural environment impacts are discussed in Section G.4,.c. Traffic circulation is discussed in Section G. 4 . f. Noise, light and glare are discussed in Sections G. 4 .g. and G. 4 .h. Public services and public utilities are discussed in Section G. 4'. i. iThe Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated, issued by the Environmental Review Committee, established conditions developed to address the above-defined environmental impacts (See Section G. 2 . ) , as they would affect the subject site. Similarly, conditions established in conjunction with this site plan review are intended to mitigate impacts to this property. i PRELIMINARY REPORT TO T HEARING EXAMINER • City' Lights Apartments PUBLIC HEARING March 13 , 1990 Page 7 (1) Aesthetics The applicant, working with staff, has endeavored to make the proposed residential complex compatible with site location and characteristics (e.g. rectangular configuration, sloped terrain, proximity to a major arterial, as well as to residential- and public uses) . Structures have been designed in a staggered pattern, located on the site and set back in a manner which: a) separates buildings adequately from one another (a minimum of 35 feet) ; b) separates this development from nearby land uses; and c) provides a buffer against the adjacent Benson Road. All structures -- dwelling units, recreation facilities, and carports -- have been designed to be coordinated in terms of • style, scale and use of materials. Similarly, structural design and siting for. both residential buildings and recreation areas protects on-site view corridors, allow maximum exposure to light and maintain air circulation within this development. Parking accommodations are located away from view corridors, and on a level portion of the site, in order to promote safe, efficient circulation within the development boundaries. Landscaping proposed is generally satisfactory; recommendation will be made to make some increase in size, type and diversity of plantings throughout the site (except that plantings will need to be reduced at selected locations to facilitate safe movement of vehicles and pedestrians) to provide visual and light/glare buffers to the neighboring church, school and condominiums, as well as against the abutting Benson Road. Screening (solid wood fencing or brick/masonry walls) will be required at the site periphery, also for the purpose of providing visual and light/glare barriers to neighboring properties, as well as containing' sound. Screening of ground level patios is recommended to further increase privacy and to protect defensible space. Recreation areas are planned to be placed at three locations on the site -- both indoor and outdoor facilities are well- separated from residential structures. All facilities are landscaped to increase the ambience of those improvements. The recreation center is to be insulated and the children's play area to be fenced to increase safety for unsupervised children and to protect nearby persons/structures from damage (e.g. airborne toys, unfettered wheeled toys) . Staff will recommend the addition of a congregate area to the site to promote a sense of community. Recommendations will also be made for increased exterior illumination, complete (site, building and unit) signage, and additional pedestrian linkage through the site and to Benson Road. These recommendations are made to increase safety for residents and visitors. Additional lighting should also improve the appearance of the site. e. Conservation of area-wide property values; The proposed development is -not expected to have a negative impact on property values since the proposed residential complex will be: 1) providing development on a property which is vacant; 2) located in an area in which such a use is generally appropriate and desirable; 3) designed and administered in a manner which provides attractive, safe housing for a variety of family sizes, age groups and lifestyles; and 4) designed to be compatible with developments on neighboring residential and non-residential XRELIMINARY REPORT TO Tl HEARING EXAMINER / City Lights Apartments PUBLIC HEARING March 13 , 1990 Page .8 (Presbyterian Church, Fred Nelson School, Springbrook School) properties. f. Safety and efficiency of vehicle and pedestrian circulation; Conditions established by the City in conjunction with the Determination of Non-Significance (See Section G.2 . ) require that the proponent participate in a traffic management plan (e.g. off-site improvements) to mitigate impacts from the estimated 372 ADWVTE which will occur in conjunction with this development, and a "fair share" contribution to regional improvements (e.g. signalization of the S.E. 31st Street/Benson Road intersection and improvements to Benson Road) to mitigate cumulative impacts. These mitigation measures will result in more efficient, safer passage for vehicles and pedestrians travelling along Benson Road. The Washington State Department of Transportation has been advised of the proposed development, and has declined to request improvements beyond those required by the City of Renton. In conjunction with site plan review, staff have identified a need for improvements to the site to increase pedestrian and vehicular safety, including: 1) revisions to parking plan to increase safety of ingress/egress route to parking spaces on- the south side of the north driveway into the site; 2) construction of marked access lanes from structures to interior roadways so that fire equipment can be transported to structures; 3) relocation of covered carports to the eastern-most parking area from the area between Buildings "3" and "4" to reduce view obstruction for residents of Building "4!" ; 4) a plan for de-icing of driveways to reduce likelihood of collisions; 5) replacement of sight-obscuring plantings with lower plantings adjacent to parking areas/circulation routes ensure adequate sight-distance for vehicle/pedestrian traffic; 6) improved signage to better identify travel routes, and structures; 7) addition of pedestrian linkage to. Benson Road; and 8) improved exterior lighting to illuminate parking areas, circulation routes, and pedestrian linkage. g. Provision of adequate light and air; The development has been generally designed and sited so that the structures are well-separated from one another (minimum of 35 feet) and from neighboring sites, so that there are no shadow impacts nor is there restriction of. light and air circulation to those sites. Similarly, design and location of structural amenities (sliding glass doors, windows, patios) , common recreation areas, parking facilities and landscaping/screening' should provide an environment which offers sufficient light and air to the residents. Recommended improvements to exterior lighting plans is also anticipated to enhance the quality and quantity of light on the site. h. Mitigation of noise, odors, and other harmful or unhealthy conditions; Residential and recreation structures have been planned/required to be well-separated from one another, improved with insulation, and the site sufficiently landscaped and screened so that interior sounds from one structure are not anticipated to transmit significant noise to other structures in-site or to neighboring properties. . PRELIMINARY REPORT TO T HEARING EXAMINER City Lights Apartments PUBLIC HEARING March 13 , 1990 Page 9 Parking facilities and service areas are designed so that they will not unduly impact living areas. Similarly, identified noise impacts to the site from adjacent Benson Road to the west and from Fred Nelson School to the east should be minimized by: 1) building setbacks (a minimum of 70 feet from Fred Nelson and 20 feet from Benson Road) , 2) interior insulation, and 3) screening. Because the site is proposed for residential use, odors and air impacts (except for those produced by fireplaces --which are subject to state and local construction and use regulations) are not anticipated. i. Availability of public services and facilities to accommodate the proposed use; and Fire and police resources are sufficient to accommodate the proposed development, with standard improvements required by • the Fire Code and Building Code (e.g. hydrants, sprinklers, alarm systems, security devices) assuming the customary number of service calls. In order to ensure that City Lights Apartments offer a safe, well-protected living environment, without generating an undue burden on police services, the Police Department and the Community Development Department recommend that the applicant provide an extraordinary police services response bond, and an approved management plan to the City for this residential complex. Such a bond is deemed appropriate for this complex, based upon the sizeable number of units on this site, as well as the amount of cumulative residential development in the neighborhood, the proximity to public facilities which produces transient pedestrian traffic in the local area, and the presence of an abutting major arterial which introduces a considerable amount of transient vehicle traffic into the area. The Renton School District has sufficient facilities to accommodate the approximately 15 school-aged children anticipated to live in this complex. Schools serving this area are: Cascade Elementary School, which is approximately one mile east of the subject site, Nelson Middle School which adjoins the subject site on the east, ' and Renton High School which is approximately one and one-half miles northwest of the subject site. Some public recreation facilities are available in the area, including neighboring Nelson Middle School, Talbot Hill Park which is approximately one mile west of the subject site and ' Philip Arnold Park which is approximately, one and one-half miles northeast of the subject site. Based upon significant increases in both residential development and non-residential development (employment centers and public service facilities) in Southeast Renton, the City has identified the short-term need for additional public recreation facilities to serve cumulative development; on this basis the Environmental Review Committee has requested a voluntary contribution of $10, 675. 00 ($150. 00 per unit) to improve community recreation facilities, as authorized (in principle) 1 by the Comprehensive Parks Plan. Public utilities are generally sufficient to support the proposed development, with standard improvements, designed to be compatible with the sloped terrain on this site. Utility easements do exist on the site at present; these easements will be utilized as is, where possible, or relocated under the guidance of the Public Works Department. (Note: These plans have been approved in principle at this point, and will be approved to specifications in conjunction with• building IPRELIMINARY REPORT TO 7- ' HEARING EXAMINER City" Lights Apartments PUBLIC HEARING March 13 , 1990 Page 10 permit review) . All new easements must be recorded with King County and filed with the City of Renton. (Note: Seattle City Light has a recorded easement on the northern boundary of the property; this will be maintained , and Seattle City Light has approved the project design. No off-site easements will be modified. ) Storm water drainage systems will need to be designed to address both general management standards and specific site characteristics -- e.g. slope, existing drainage channel, , underground springs. A conceptual plan has been approved, as directed by the Public Works Department (see G.2. for related Environmental Review Committee conditions) , based upon Department policies and upon the findings in the geotechnical study provided by the applicant. The existing natural storm drainage channel will be eliminated and replaced with a mechanical drainage system because the natural system is not operating effectively now and, as a result, erosion is occurring, transporting storm waters, dirt and debris onto Benson Road and neighboring sites. The proposed system will be designed and engineered to meet City standards so as to protect the integrity of the site and to mitigate off-site impacts. j . Prevention of neighborhood deterioration and blight. Staff view this development as having a positive impact on the existing neighborhood (See G.4 .e. ) . The complex envisioned -- with design characteristics, mitigation measures and administrative management systems established in conjunction with environmental review (See G.2 . ) and land use review (See G.4 .c; G. 4 .d; G. 4 . i. ) -- should set a standard which is compatible with/can be emulated by existing and planned residential developments in this section of the community. The addition of a well-designed and well-maintained residential complex should serve to improve the sense of "community" in this area. Residents are likely to patronize local shops, services and public facilities, thereby supporting the economy of Southeast Renton. H. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommend that the Hearing Examiner support the application of North Bay Development/Johnson Braund (SA 087-89) for site plan approval to develop City Lights, a 61 unit multi-family residential complex, subject to the following conditions: 1) That the applicant comply with all conditions established in the Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated (November 1, 1989) for the proposed project. 2) That the applicant provide a revised site plan which f delineates the following features, with the plans to be subject to the approval of the City's Planning , Division/Landscape Planner: a. The addition a congregate area at the mail box center, including a covered seating area, bulletin boards, and plantings, scaled in size and number to that area; b. Screening (fencing) of the children's outdoor play area adjacent to the Recreation Center, to protect persons and property; :PRELIMINARY REPORT TO TF HEARING EXAMINER City' Lights Apartments PUBLIC HEARING March 13 , 1990 Page 11 c. Screening of ground level patios with solid wood fencing and/or landscaping, to increase privacy and provide defensible space; d. Relocation of covered carports to the eastern-most row of parking stalls, as feasible; e. Revisions to parking plan to increase safety of ingress/egress route to parking spaces on the south side of the north driveway to the site; f. Revisions to parking plan to relocate covered carports from the area between Buildings "3" and "4" to the eastern-most row of parking stalls (south of Building "4") , as feasible, to reduce view obstruction for residents of Building "4" ; g. Provision of marked emergency access lanes from structures to interior roadways so that fire equipment can be transported to structures; (Note: This plan must be approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau) . h.. Increased on-site exterior illumination through the introduction of additional pedestrian scaled decorative pole lighting fixtures: 1) throughout the parking area; and 2) surrounding the outdoor seating area on the southern portion of the site; i. Increased signage, including: a) improved identification of the development at the south entrance (with a monument sign similar to that proposed for the north entry way) ; and b) traffic control information (e.g. directional arrows, warning signs) to ensure safe passage for vehicles and pedestrians on steep and/or curved roadways; j . Provision of improved pedestrian linkage, including: a) marked and signed crosswalks connecting Building "3" and Building "4" to service areas and the recreation center; and b.) sidewalks from the site to Benson Road. 3) That the applicant provide a revised landscape plan which delineates the following features, with the plans to be subject to the approval of the ,City's Planning Division/Landscape Planner: a. Modifications to landscaping plan design to provide consistency in plantings throughout the site; b. Modifications to location of plantings to ensure adequate sight-distance for vehicle/pedestrian traffic; 4) That the applicant provide a $5, 000. 00 performance bond for the protection of landscaping, to be valid for a period of three (3) years, with the bond to be subject to the approval of the City Attorney. (Note: This performance bond is calculated based upon the value of replacement of new plantings and of retained native vegetation. ) 5) That the applicant voluntarily provide: a) a renewable extraordinary police service response bond in the amount of $9, 837. 00, to be valid for a period of three (3) years; and b) a management plan which addresses rental guidelines and provides for security system maintenance. The bond and the plan should be in place in advance of the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, subject to the approval of the City Attorney. .PRELIMINARY REPORT TO TF [HEARING EXAMINER City Lights Apartments PUBLIC HEARING March 13 , 1990 Page 12 6) That the applicant submit revised plans for driveways to the site which either: a) provides a design for accesses which are sloped to six percent (6%) or less (3% or less is preferred) from Benson Road to a point forty (40) feet 40 east of the roadway; or b) provides a plan for mechanical de- icing (e.g. electrically heated pads) of entry driveways adjacent to Benson Road to reduce likelihood of collisions on the subject property and/or on that abutting arterial during wet/icy conditions. (Note: This plan -- together with signage and with landscape control -- is recommended in order to mitigate impacts to persons and property which might otherwise occur in the presence of this steep driveway, with areas of limited sight distance) . These plans are be approved by the Transportation Systems Division in advance of issuance of site preparation/building permits. 7) That the applicant provide a plan for installation of temporary signage on Benson Road and on structures within the site boundaries, to ensure the provision of adequate emergency services in the case of fire or accident during the construction phase of this development. This plan is subject • to approval by the Building Division in advance of issuance of site preparation/building permits. (Also See Condition 2 . i) . . Note: In advance' of issuance of building permits the applicant will be expected to provide approved plans for:. 1) construction of rockeries and/or retention walls (heights, materials, setbacks, etc. ) ; 2) relocation of utilities easements and for service systems; . ._: . . �., 5 •• '' R-4'1- ' .. ' 'i 7 . ' . . .___.\ ``\ ` ism ie • C ` to C�17 .`, �iri �s ,,, -25 ..g— R 1lk_ • L� -4- - n' • \ ; sJ rl`, , .,.,Y` xa ♦ R_q. ; f4T • • We LJ .e 15 • • ♦♦p!♦ Y.♦!. ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ - xeL. z7 ol•a 1.4� I� • • • ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ �Q'O� i , , � ,�- I M e; ••♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ �`.A •S, TaL130I ;{ILL tC#4.-**".•-• 4...4 p♦♦� ♦♦♦♦♦♦•♦♦♦♦♦♦• � 'iIGHSON ;y s. ` /14,030 1 HILL PARK ••♦••♦♦i 0 •♦♦• •♦•♦♦♦ �'�a OC?L ,' ELEMENTARY fej l'Oe♦. j♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ 1�� 5CIIOOL �'+ �r ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ 1► 4 ♦ O . ♦..♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ •• �+`o 4.,,.�'�j• 4°♦�♦e♦♦ ♦ SPRING GLEN .. I 0 b7ex.:,Ilse f, , 15. . . �. ‘5 ♦ i ♦ ELEMENTARY m ��•� a iga .. ♦ •a♦ •♦ O;♦_�. SCHOOL i / • ' •-44 sf;','•i.. '',./e t. ♦v r S 26',CT ® �, : •:,f� ff;y: • r • i �• M. ti�su0010,114,i �_� �� :S•::�G •\ N ♦r ♦� ii S 27rH ST.\ • , ix r ti 26 rr i - `_J�®�lrr � ..S r)• - '0v.� ♦O.• ♦ 1► 4 2T- _- •ST s s 2 5T o ,cc �"'��'4'_5T ••:•!r:� •' `• 4' ♦ f' ♦ ', 5' •r,,: '.icevi• f t.A 1Ma .\ m5 e� ,,, �� v4. 1•_ . 15 ,'�w♦ �� 0 ♦ ♦ •� I P •i • ,n ,� s' a 55 - . ` . ♦ 1► ,a . s Q 4. q NM q,)tiet ,f '2 L h S65Y'.o` T� .:' • .�/ •S ♦ 1♦� Z cm S B ` 5. 2'•�" 51 scSx c.`'2.9 �". °;����'♦♦I�sOy1�`J A a \.l.` i,,p�} K..? \) 2 ^Vf rr�4f. •: ._� 1•.• S���d�J•�� �,`►•• i+ 3' S, z;i•' 57 '`< /v ,' ``r" • ,, '1 rR; ' 41'� �• p C"19I S 3, �q6♦,♦`.e. ♦.® r b.! - S T �Cre nOr 7., 9? E 7`T z I, o So r :a ♦_� I i. 1�j 1 • ,, r ' "ze 17 Illir. llyj 5 4l L5 f a 5 0 4.. vAg,,'t .f a ,• .14 f' 'r z3 xz s, 7 ♦ ♦_�) ,n I— —1' 1N R_ cr fY S5 f 5, -."._ •S, S _I i^CT �•••4`•,•' .—.4 ---___• _'Z 25 *leg S®� V ,' , r '� i9 ... 5 S r ... --� ' • • City Lights Apartments -- SA-087-89 APPLICANT North Bay Development Corp . TOTAL AREA 3 . 31 acres PRINCIPAL ACCESS Benson Road - EXISTING ZONING R_1 - 1 EXISTING USE Vacant • i PROPOSED USE Multi-family, apartments COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN COMMENTS Located on the east side of Benson Road between Puget Drive and South 26th Street . / 1 I I 4-1--/---1 J ems:✓ Ic-2:.•:.•1 _ ..,•_•-•�•-•_ • • I.. •a•:?:>:'•; �r%ii.... [ • • • 1 • • •i'�•'.• •it ;;��./: : :;:!La.,. : •� '.: LAND USE CEMENT I •••' ••• •••�• "`::, •° ,; : : � : - - • • • • \• • • ',. •• ;i:::i:i*i:i•T . . . . . . . . • • • • • • • • • • •• • • • • • • •. • • `�� _ Single Family uumn I Commercial •• ••• • ,. • • I i • • • • • 0 • • • • '• kl II II ) 1"• • • • • •. • • • • ;$, l,. • • • • • • • • •' • Low Density ` ••. , ��. Office / Office Park •I u •; ,•,•,•,•• `'J Multi-Family • • • • • • •.•:,-, it\ \., •............................. um. • • • • • • 0000000 Medium Density °°°°°°°( � 111. �,r. • )0000000 --- •— °C Public/Quas.i-Public • I <;;;pl •■ Multi-Family )°°°°°°° --i'L'f)-e t 0000000C llll Filill1 r....., .:2•1 ...: k High Density g ' A lllllrit- rpm:::::::.*:**:: ::::::.:.:::::::.:.:.:.::::.: ,.: >;... : Li ht Industrial f:111411 ‘ �<.:; > , Multi-Family0° ::l.— .I;. • iiim ; .rt C•„ ,M �sli' missi a'II_,.4.••:•1"I Aft • ,•o' r . fi•', . ��T Recreation '•'•'• HeavyIndustrial '._--, 111'.■'; , o°°° • r:e d *1•••••••1j o •i 1•••'..f.1, '<,. Q ' '3:,;', Greenbelt =---- Manufacturing Park •----��--■1• _act ••; a... • c,^ •'l'•H•••1 'O0/mow `_ ."'\ 3.• .'.•. . / Multiple Option ae:ee.�eeei.a% ;,%Y ............. •:-: • ..: P:::•:::::::::::::::::::. •-•,••• ,, • ---------- , ••:... •,, ••••••,... _deist ,MMMMM EDENINNI0 gONIII:.-..-1/2111iii. . '•I'ic.'!-1:.'''7.C'fl.?.:i':;:.',Nir.N•••-'q?1 <•(-• 1......iiii: .s•-,,,.';'..6-'',1%-P -"': •'n e• "1 77 '171: '• i'c'y k'.�Rp �.°L•C[,• ,n'.�''e4. rg-�./�• X'n^ • .. . .I• t ~ �{ .. I :i << , fl'I'ppm �' 1 .[�J ig' •Ii�`'' ,..I;,I ,;• _. ,r'�'. _ •j �• __ -Q�Ft'��-_ _ •Maim iii!il�iiiiiii %:'># 'i1:'.::<}'s�x:� l�l, , ,, '.,� ,.n;[p°".'.; -iii:G t}�.:1<;,•, y? .0 �a9•.,---- - - —_ tu����--- •--',000 ` , °o°000• .f�'Ec.:• Erg`•,• • llirl-1PL'Cl� --_- ___- l"w"I I o 0 0 0 0• ;'[:1� •00°o0 0 oT"""Ey' `` (: oo. c•>.'c''Y•C'u' i7 00000 'Ni,. -- -- l"�"IV 1. 0 "'07l' ";.. 'c•t;'•(.. ( --_—_a o000000 ;.Lin--. l"w"I 1 °o° "'��"' ` !-•:•o°p ',c"cF it•0oo°o°O //Is`� •l".."1 I•°o° •5' . if 'F,°• ,1 n.(.�,.A.,'.i.� o0000000000•>• .4 - - o0000000000•d - ---- E""a P::"■ `� :,ti� _..• , •n •et(� =_ 000 oo oo o°oo•,c•, tri ----- - • " • 1"'1'�"""'■■■■,` '::) , c•.^ ..; i ,,t.3'61c•''''•`• �.. �1y:E`•.' - ":000000000000.,o I/A1 _ -- - "- .� ■ .:J' a•ti•'o < i.•,:.., . • •obo0o00000000••r;'•, ;:•3'., •:'''J'' �1'•1• % • - -:•00000000000o 00•'J. •� ■ I tt•L'•'c\';; n,,`t7,':�• Cj<.•• a•'C�. .F•�•:�{' r il000000000000000..,. �►/ �.y.♦;T,',•J �jI uuu�luu•t"" / :'i�i�+i�;•:. ,;t'4'�_%;., o �o r('� •00000000000000 —j 1 *-.=• � •::'...:.y:.•....:. :•: '.e'... •,:h• 'nk. 00000 • .0000000000000 ; - ==..1, - mg: w .- .: 000°o° • 00000000°Oo•. agog," A��„Ir""'.- '.. :.•. .••?•••.•:.:• :::r.,,• , o0000 •°0000 9�, :�}:<::;:�:: �:�C:;•. ,`i;: D000• coo 7 .I""'�• / • 1�•\� ---will AL,- �i, � •••� .['. �. ., 'Si. '� . 441 iff .141:‘,":..:i::ii::i:i:i ...:,: , . ;ie.. Imen 41 M f:111,12:r51 • Sigi�j r'l':a'��'.■:' _-_ --- jam•'(, ) ''�' •Oo0• f••••'• YI'l'I '\•loll"'' r.[) I 0 f 1 • . . - ul'ilu"ulloll'u J�f;,-_= >`. _ ':%'- ot > :: ''< l ■ ••••• JIlliiiiiiiIIIk ,f, - •r •' _-__-• _--_ o00 -_ :y��', o00 .., _-__- _ — •o00c �000, _ _-O000-_-_-_- a'.J:. / Il""'_ • -111111■"""tall■■"'•R - --- —'000 ----a:��o .. ••.. -� Ii■■'■■•uu"1 111■11■■■■■■■1■■■■■■■ " _-_ _____ ____=- ''' • `x•� •-•-* . ' . , 1•t'""(: mum an l r .n•`-'r :v::•>:_:•.. r •�• • 00, ,. ��_i-G_•'=. - iitnisi� wom l ij,� -- _- - N. r.r- _ •Cu'n n n n I / •o° I',1.1 Lg�111"1'\Ga•Il� o,.: . ,,-� _- .r r0": ••0000.& c Y';i0 00000. 1 :oo .',•"l an 1 :;-=-- ---- -- ---- %r t' "'r_' r °°°°°°.' .�..,� •°0p°oo mmorsel 0...III _ _ _ .7`. I"'b•ll •• . Iq r. --_ �_r-_---�-- car:` OOo°.. C. r ••o°oo°oo°o•� '� `"'mein,.",. . ___ ____ ___ �-.L• 000010• , \VMS' C.;'1•'""•'l'ile" •(• - lip,3l i? 1 rMMMmo i ri3..,':•'.c �.•eN* =---- ---_-—_ !h: 1 ''h'' %• +O•n. / r:': .'J.J.,.",•. ,,•.1 ',..mo o:•,.zJ,✓w,-Z 1111 . .• ••• • .`4y"n` -------1 •..�:%,�'• •J,�• top ..■" • • • 11 \ I _ 'C I I" , • -,:.-,<. , a:•' '0..9.. ---...1 I —_- 1 - -_- • _ 1. INN..� :i=%r }:��9"♦"nil■'A •.♦fie, II MIL r:. -—--- - -- •II"l U'°°°°.• ' •' '.mot ..... '' ......,...L..: ''"•.'�:i:•'•l"l•1.'II'1._.._-. i ..:-- _------ III -_ -_---- __- r'11"l . • • �` :::: •••"11"II'• ft ► l i••7 ------- -- ----- - �iul,uar '0000000• o`r•• . �• t•:' _ . . y---- _-.......1111.1, •00000000. r3•,�r..= �t.( � \%iii�� ` JAL j ,•e - ��"'I'• 000000000 1:'" - r menta, 00000000 `''Y •� .c .. C� i i' En ..att"la'1 0°00000,• c• _);. ' 00000 00000. '; :;: jil •0000.000000 ... • .r', ,- ':Y �� '1:00000•0000• '• :{•: iy ,r; En I-- .0.D I 'V • Q ,..„.•?;'�i J� CU ;%OP 1 0" w • • • 1 • • Y=• • - OOOOo00C 00 . i •" _•sb...4 ;' • Lett, 1 e I1 °ao o.. I • CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO. : ECF-087-89 APPLICATION NO (S) : SA-087-89 PROPONENT: North Bay Development Corporation Melvin Easter, Johnson Braund Design PROJECT NAME: City .Lights Apartments DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 61 unit apartment complex to be located on a vacant 3 . 3 acre R-3 , Multi-Family Residential , zoned parcel . (Note: Density level has been adjusted for greenbelt area located on the site. ) LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: East side of Benson Road between Puget Drive and South 26th Street across from Victoria Hills apartment complex. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Community Development Department Current Planning Division • The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43 . 21C. 030 (2) (c) . Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-2822 (D) Renton Municipal Code (see attached sheet) . These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340 (2) . Because mitigation measures have been imposed, the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fifteen (15) days from November 6, 1989 . Any interested party may submit written comments which must be submitted by 5 : 00 p.m. , November 21, 1989 , in order to be considered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period will commence following the finalization of the DNS . Responsible Official : Environmental Review Committee c/o Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator Current Planning Division Community Development Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 PUBLICATION DATE: November 6 , 1989 DATE OF DECISION: November 1, 1989 SIGNATURES : 'qenneth E. ire Communi e nt • Lynn, . uttman, Director Public Works Department DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED MITIGATION MEASURES PROJECT: ' City Light Apartments • PROPONENT: North Bay Development Corporation Melvin Easter, Johnson Braund Design ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF-087-89 APPLICATION NUMBER: SA-087-89 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 61 unit apartment complex to be located on a vacant 3 . 3 acre R-3 , Multi-Family Residential , zoned parcel. (Note: Density level has been adjusted for greenbelt area located on the site. ) LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: East side of Benson Road between Puget Drive and South 26th' Street across from Victoria Hills apartment complex. RECOMMENDATIONS : The Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of Non- Significance-Mitigated with the following conditions: 1) That the applicant refrain from cutting any trees until the site plan (including the landscaping plan and tree plan) for the proposed development is approved by the City to mitigate impacts to the natural environment; 2) That the applicant be required to provide. a traffic mitigation plan which includes off-site improvements adjacent to the site, the retention of the right-of-way easement on Benson Road, and a fair share contribution to regional improvements (including, but not limited to signalization of the Benson Road/S .E . 31st Street intersection) . This plan is subject to approval by the Traffic. Engineering Division in advance of the issuance of site preparation/building permits ; 3) That the applicant be required to provide insulation to limit interior ambient noise in living units ' and indoor recreation areas to 45 dBA; 4) That the applicant be required to provide a plan for screening at • all boundaries of the site, utilizing six foot high standard wood fencing on the north, south and eastern boundaries, and wood 1 fencing, rockeries or a brick/masonry wall on Benson Road to provide mitigation of light, glare and some noise from the abutting roadway and nearby land uses, as well as to provide site definition which is valuable for personal safety and crime prevention. Specific plans should be subject to approval by the Planning Division and the Public Works Department in conjunction with site plan review. Mitigation Measures Page 2 5) That the applicant be required to provide a plan for a storm drainage management system (including a minimum 25 year storage/5 year release plan [with detention/retention] , oil/water separation, and biofiltration) will be required to be provided, subject to approval by the Public Works Department, in advance of the issuance of site preparation/building permits. 6) That the applicant be required to provide a construction management plan including: a) an erosion control plan, accompanied by an agreement to confine .construction activities which might result in erosion to the period from May 1st to September 1st, and a plan to hydroseed permeable areas on the site by September 15th -- if the applicant wishes to undertake construction activities during other periods in the year, advnce permission must be obtained from the Public Works Department,land a certified soils engineer must be on site at all times when work is underway; b) a plan for wheel- washing of construction trucks prior to departure from the site; c) a plan for periodic watering down of the site to control dust;, d) a plan for hauling hours and routes to control traffic impacts ; e) a plan for construction hours to mitigate noise impacts; and f) a renewable street clean-up bond in the amount of $2 , 000. 00 . These plans are subject to approval by the Public Works Department, Fire Prevention Bureau, Police Department and Planning Division, prior to the issuance of site preparation permits. 7 . That the applicant provide a voluntary contribution of $10, 675. 00 ($175 . 00 x 61 units) to mitigate off-site recreation impacts . Note #1: At the time of site plan approval, the following recommendations are likely to be made, including, but not limited to requests for: 1) construction of fire equipment access links to structures; 2) changes to landscaping to provide consistency in plantings throughout the site; 3) changes to location of plantings to ensure adequate sight-distance for vehicle/pedestrian traffic; 4) landscaping maintenance bond; .5) fencing for the children's play area; 6) plans for improved exterior illumination; 7) plans for improved signage; 8) plans for pedestrian linkage to Benson Road; 9) revisions to parking plan to increase safety of ingress/egress to parking spaces on ' the south side of the north driveway to the site; 10) addition of on- site amenities (congregate areas) ; 11) approved plans for rockeries and/or retention walls (heights, materials, setbacks, etc. ) ; 12) approved plans for relocation of utilities easements and for service systems; 13) extraordinary services bonding; 14) a management operations. plan; 15) a plan for de-icing of driveways to reduce likelihood of collisions; and 16) relocation of covered carports to the eastern-most row of parking stalls. mmdoc • FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU • POLICE DEPARTMENT - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS : •- COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN . WRITING. • PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON AUGUST 2 , 1989 . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: t)77L/TV ,F,,/6•/A/E,E.e/f\l Co APPROVED • APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED 74-t-e-.32±4z. � y 'fyU-' . u •a f G rP�flJ UTILITY APPROVAL SL':;i:. i� •i T� _ "'` �f7• 7 LATE COMERS AGREEMENT i I No .[._ ..;. LATE COMERS AGREEMENT-STaE SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT C(::;P E-Err;:T:.R . YES O/.S:°OX70Xr1-4 _ 74,.2�D.° • SYSTEM OEYELOPM.NT C': 2r S':.1.1ER; / s 4/7S.°2)( 70 /•,*As /2,otgo ° lICIA!ASSESSMENT A',EA C:: ,2E-WATER 4/o °c f,`��D • na S': ASSESSMENT . -SEER ,l./ • SEWER P}_O 5GVA[tkre SL6360- 'PLA�J FIRE ffFu :;..; . . ; Y 5 8i FM se- 2E au 2 E • /�� r_-r[.', S U + L 01 E" 1-l.U.Y ')G- 2 E l.o r .1..` ,• :� pE e 5 GxTCNsiaN s o 9E • ;61q/Guy6 G/li DATE /7— 2 7 _ Fq SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE )• '1 ' BUJ; ae(,, 7/2 1 /.51 664 ?E21. 4/88 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: ���� APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED • (54 DATE SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 7\ FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU • • POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT • OTHERS : - COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P.M. ON AUGUST 2 , 1989 . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: lie \01'a) - 1 APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED kny development and/or construction shall comply with current Fire and Building g Codes and Ordi- second means of approved access is required. Fire. D�epa rtment access roads/lanes shall-b linimum width 20'; minimum height 13' 6 Yes_ v No a paved 'reliminary fire flow calculations show a fire flow of squired. -3 hydrants with a mij�►mum flow of �. SD �, is required: - ,L,. _._1 gpm each rimary hydrant is required to be within econdary hydrants are required to be within 60D feet of the feet structure str ofcture. ructure. the approved automatic sprinkler system is:required to protect the total structure. Yes I fire department access roads are to be paved and installed prior to construction. Yes —No I fire hydrants are required to be installed and approved prior to construction. Yes No SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE DATE i9�S REV. 6//88 8 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: -1Vice_ APPROVED • v/ APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED , AS\IA,(L ktiOr\ :o P Tot Lot Tbdd.,(:c.,vs, 2) (AA.s,,u, a-h /4". OF L6 fi vLD w(Pk- K. S\riu v w , p cui/ U L ai✓ tj o jvo uw4- Uv a. n vt buuaL ,c.A S 1 5 (f14.0451,i ��i,� 1� ,s aitk*- b DATE Z �I SIGNATURE DIR OR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 RENTO: :OMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEP. 'MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-087-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA; ECF-087-89 PROPONENT: North Bay Development Corporation/Melvin Easter, Johnson Braund Design Group. PROJECT TITLE: City Lights Apartments. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 70 unit apartment complex to be located on a vacant 3 . 3 acre R-3-zoned parcel . (Note: Density level has been adjusted for greenbelt on-site. ) LOCATION: East side of Benson Road between Puget Drive and South 26th Street. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING .DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE. DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION' PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: -- j ro--, , COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P.M. ON AUGUST 2 , 1989 . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: %Uri\ V,L_4A-e-r APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS V( NOT APPROVED /Sec orc.V ions ( GC�C, ) • iv7 it `/ DATE 2 , SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: August 4, 1989 • TO: Lenore Blauman, Senior Planner FROM: Garth Cray, Storm Water Utility Engineering-V SUBJECT: City Lights Environmental Review The following are comments on the aforementioned Environmental Review: 1) Open drainage channel needs to be left open unless it is shown that such channel presents an erosion problem. 2) A temporary erosioin control plan needs to be provided and work will be performed within a May 1st through September 1st construction window. 3) Detention system should be located outside of the roadway easement. 4) Detention will be based upon a 25-year storm with a 5-year release rate. Existing detention will need to be accounted for in design. 5) A baffled oil/water separator will be required. A biofiltration swale should be incorporated into the design. ER-CTYLT/GDC:lf ,/: Earth — ° ? ' Air'. ° ° - o ° 3 . Water ° 3 . • Plants ° ° ° o ° ° 5 . Animals ° ° 0 5 . Energy & Natural Resources ° ° ° 7 . Environmental Health ' • ° ° o 3 . Land & Shoreline Use ° ° o ° O ) . Housing ° ° ° LO . Aesthetics ° ° ° . o 0 ° L1 . Light & Glare ° ° ° ° ° ° L2 . Recreation ° ° ° o 0 ° L3 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° • ° ° L4 . Transportation ° • ° ° L5 : Public Services ° ° • ° L6 . Utilities ° ° ° ;OMMENTS c)(kx\(„$ _ Foy v..s 1 : 161./L- _. ',1 -----"--PQ-CL-1-1,1--) :•• (.6.-4,+' r‘ 34'1----.- 1 i-''-.--i--.-1('--• R-j?----.1' ‘Q ;6'--1-' L V7 rk --, e-k--4____ ( Po.-fx---L 1 ? �e have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas . Ln which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this ' • )roposal . €, S -f_aq_ . 7 7 $7?7 3ignati 9' of Director or Authcffized Representative Dat Rev. 6/88 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: ros12orfetti / Jer V/C s Z)1vi5/on APPROVED IZAPPROVEDAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT .L APPROVED j, ThG a 1�G4.ir /erAorr2 a 7M. (771e olii-s*eon/ad as /oh 1X4 Ie7Q/bJ :. Arr� z8e sornz_ measures to mif- Lf. heir- /m aL9 on 77e, infrsecho 0 n ' ,� z s 31.5* St ano( 7` ,� deed {-or � . n 7X4 P64 o .e lt.5o n �oQ-a�_ a�j, � net/ o.� � L � n 1, � l ��// I o f iqensv n Atel in or 4n� w l7X 10 a�. UJGd�fL //loll'' SGG�eal eI /6� e. lift /. ,0ed.c c�t�e 8 0 f /e Qoi 0,4 I2 `v 74 u di� ea,3,e irn n71 a `o t l 7i 4 frr n7L o L r-/6,r er o ve es I��rf c� a,f� yl2one?�ar/ /n t ns7 n o f� �r EzV, 1�� on 7, ,_ 1 Opl0.5t 7e- sritie .off' .Se/2son leea) I, 1,1n1rjfroccnd l eit- ahle ? S 1 / ' GOri_stpa Teit-' d rive-LtVdj n /n ctc6o ante- wtL C, -`fnhrd s (Sew. eorrec'ons 0rl1b4- /U/art.S) Lio4- 4 A_ALiv-/) — • DATE l B g SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU ' POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION • PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE • • .PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS : - COMME• NTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P.M. ON AUGUST 2 , 1989 . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: L `)� APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS X NOT APPROVED = :x �� �� 1- ? ,� s bu ALES /7 • DATE 7---L -V•79? SIGNATURE 0-F'.DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: PL,AN1j1}\j&, CLV' C1U I m J APPROVED - t 1 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ,` ,,� NOT APPROVED 1') SL j f P 4'.)(7/0,\.) ,I\.,>l rz o uTimm. ' .A►!o-(IL)G,) S lw ULx). rbe oc ive 11 1\-101,11 _ O UT t-4 aiOte2 L ASODII/ONAL 160 F f�iN(p f''}\ Jar �_�^ 1 , `' Qu C CiN/vErci !! . iDGW},E LK < 'aT hH 3 ("pi PRO' . F1tOI Y rt `t0 m e s 1 ..�U f mp�..e t:-Dk-i/=:((,) t F pR^Q.S-C( 3 l cj•1 TOAPPROVM DATE SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORI�Z.-E.D REPRESENTATIVE j Cj 7-1-- REV. 6/88 • 12n-- ej)- a-)(v!an,o (._L 7N�d 21,LCv . . oNr d sa2N CkCv oxvo47n . r pf 0 W,L39-- Ru. M a kck RENTOT OMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPi MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-087-89 APPLICATION NO (S) . : SA; ECF-087-89 PROPONENT: North Bay Development Corporation/Melvin Easter, Johnson Braund Design Group. PROJECT TITLE: City Lights Apartments. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 70 unit apartment complex to be located on a vacant 3 . 3 acre R-3-zoned parcel . (Note: Density level has been adjusted for greenbelt on-site. ) LOCATION: East side of Benson Road between Puget Drive and South 26th Street. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION ' FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT i OTHERS : - COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON AUGUST 2 , 1989 . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: .ems 1415kljun APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED 41.e.7; • tt.L . DATE SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 • ii . crg-L_ .-_]V' ___ - r ._"" ._. -1 r I___ _1 il Ril L__ ___]0. • n, LilEDili\-\ C-. 3 r--- ---IM r 1_ .L-- _)1 L t__. 0 . • SZL` n��`( )�MDUg i a I • . • ¢ m Jrcl SPRIN STATISTICS SHEET INDEX I / �;'IEitao01. ! etl�• n��' APPLICANT: North Bay Development Corporation CS COVER SHEET ' 1 ,f1.1 • �-'1 - - 633 North Mildred _ ____ I Suite G 'X "•+- ' PI SITE PUN /- �" Tacoma,WA 98406il- �• 1'j CD (206) 565-9400 PIA GRADING i DRAINAGE PUN --�--]]] -//_-,. ....Sr CID GO • ARCHITECT/LANDSCAPE PSB LANDSCAPE PUN / �� . 1 �letn 2 ARCHITECT: , Johnson Braund Design Group, Inc. 304 Main Ave.South, Suite 200 PIC SITE SECTIONS /g--�-M1I ��"O� Renton, WA 98055(206) 271-7200 P2 UNIT PLANS (A1,A2,C) -� E� CIVIL ENGINEER: pacific Engineering PJ UNIT PANS (B i GARAGES) a ` ]oi Main Ave, south, Suite]00 ,�.-.t_ l`•� '--. o ---_ • //////// N Z Repton,WA 98055 Pi BUILDING ELEVATIONS n • _ (206) 2]5-6688 ~ '^L--` o - r1���I''- I ��I , UM CHURCH s SITE SURVEY - CW lLL:` /HOJEC7 SITE (!- SISD AREA 3.21 Atr s (3]9,621'.F.) o Fl S // (DEDICATTDN) 0.30 acres (4.564 5...) O 1 L-- e�I.1 , e 11` {� EXISTING ACRE _�__�_. 1 , / -_-__-_ CO (STING/ACNE): R](xs:l) 6 1II` i, FAIIMUM UNITS ALLOWED: 80.0 _ , ' IF'11 Q PROPOSED UNITS II,t v T r pe A-1 (laam, Atm): 17 602 ii •_ = ,5, I _C1 _�b�Q 7 (n cz Type Art (SDdm, SDe): la ` lSPS • ,`t I I _2' �;r•-)' F-' 732 SF Type B unarm,2De): s Ng,(0) _-+. _� fir-- /'� /J .7,. j/v� •99t SF54 SF PEa50 V''�'.IV d f`\`..:^(2`/ � `lam ,^••) t ¢ f--• „ U ypa c (zDa:v,study, 2Da): le Total Proposed units: 51 ��'•ii✓ -,,f V `.0Q��---O..-b C �� Q J DEV=OMENT DENSITY -.• -- ` . •�-.__ ry QCO ICa'xTs/AeRel: 19.a , --' .'''..-1. .--7-. .1'lf��' " - 0 PARING Resident stalls at I �\�'-/�/' {/�• F- s S _ GueaVaatalla at 61x1.5�92 t Y 1 I %\ V L •st- _ r N ' 1/4 nits: =1.2 VICINITY MAP Al ICAta 1 2a9• 1�'1 ' m J Total stalls required: So] `� J m = (Xc): J (Standard): ]s (Compact): 29 r Total Stalls 9COVidea: 107 H c e LOT 2, CITY OF RENTON SHORT PLAT NUMBER 070-80 (ALSO KNOWN AS,NELSON C., P. Covered rtalla MIDDLE SCHOOL SHORT PUT RECORDED ORDER RECORDING NUMBER 810]299002, Cottarpostal: 53 ). - (Garegee): 8 SAID RAT 2 BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: OGI(Carla COMPOSITION: ' THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTH QUARTER OF SECTION• 29, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILIAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING • COUNTY,WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS PULSARS: • Bldg, 153 6"A-1" -its, 6"A-2•units, 6"V u =s Gross (living) area: 20,412 S.F.• BEGINNING AT TILE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION:THENCE NORTH 88 JDDEGREES 12'38"EAST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE THEREOF J]].J] FEET: • Eldg• 2 5"n-3•units, 6•A-2°units, 12 ^C•units THENCE NORTH 1 DEGREES :2'40" EAST 749.65 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF 1 unit with rental storage lockers. BEGINNING;Gtass!lam r area (incl. s torage) 1.,448 S.F. TIIESCE NORTH 88 DEGREES 17'20" WEST 191.67 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF _ OAD ROD 91 gs 4 8°B•t, 5): THENCE RNORTIIERLV EALON0. G NSAIO EAST LINE TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID 1111 Gross floor(living) area. 7,632 S.F. SECTION 29: THENCE NORTH 87 DEGREES 08'52" EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF SECTION 29 TO A POINT WHICH IS SOUTH 87 DEGREES 08'52" WEST A DISTANCE OF I IMPERVIOUS AREA: 989.22 T FROM THE NORTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION: BaOS.IDO inter: 23,040 S.F. THENCE SOUTH 02 DEGREES 2i'SO"EAST A DISTANCE OF 363.57 FEET: n rking,cDtivea i - THENCE SOUTH 18 DEGREES 61'39"EAST A DISTANCE OF 50.24 FEET: Walks: • <1,245 S.F. THENCE SOUTH 01 DEGREES 45'25"EAST A NCE OF 197.67 FEET MORE OR 0 e7 U LESS TO A POINT WHICH BEARS SOUTH BB DEGREES 1]'20'•EAST FROM THE TRUE • Z ter`. I TOTALS: 64,315 S.F. (45R) POINT OF BEGINNING: THENCE NORTH BB DEGREES 17'20• NEST 47.2l FEET MORF. OR LESS TO THE U C OPEN SPACE/ •• TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; N U ' LANDSCAPE AREA: ]5,8<S S.F. (SST) EXCEPT THE NORTH JO FEET THEREOF, LYING NITHIIN BON LAKE PIPE LINE O r. Building Setbacks: Front-10 feet RIGHT OF WAY. d C _ J Side _12 feet Rear -12 feet LEGAL DESCRIPTION • Building Haight: Allowed -50 feet ©2 • Provided-Approx. 35 feet • • JohnsonBraund design group, Inc. architecture, landscape & planning consultants . .i --I ' . • e.XL,b-,,n-G Cr.A.4.4..:r.4e...i----:.1.1,-.C... tc• ./, 5,2.Fli E2 ! a E.,....4-57 PFCCDRF-14..-IM' r.-.9.--F.. -2.1-' •`,4 : . .i7 4 •.i;•.-si f, o i - i R.L.11,E.e....... E.1-ier-.2-7- d570,-4.,/, •DS.A.......a.a.G7r--... •. . S 1 45'25-E 5. .197.87' .. c.12:1%;•,, • , /- s: 1 S22453E . • 333.57' 51:3-g-e--E.----• - - . ..1 _ - - ,, e-X:,-Sr.n.C.1.2VF.---C.IF-7-A- ,-.•-1 . .,,.LI ..7-0 . ' 3 /J 2. .5.1.-rte,C.....- • 2.. . . .) . . . < I C;,--9C.r-1 SC.R.E.E.r, EY: ---'.,-,C. N , '0 • " ' 7, G k.... '; .• - ' - FE,...IC.E. ....'-:Z.T..”---,K7 D..._-c, F • --1 ) -.• . . . . . • 2' •. . .... -. . • .•. ., i • •to I el, , 1 . ' I• I ___ 1,ei— • j . q.),-:-_...,--.7,2,_ . • - • t.-, . r-"-- 1.3. c,, c..1.,_.1,..• ..C: 1 =ii=\'' ''I''.c-1 e-'11 e.-- i i i I 1 .ai 1 i , .. 3 • I--- , ._ . i i .' • - . 1 1, 'i, , _L_.' \-i) . .ii.c iii i -, •,. .,,,,,,-, :. . .• - I r r, , . --,,-—- •- • 1 ,, --,-. , •.__... 0 I 1 I .. 7,\I -- I , • ,--' ,,, , --- ' CT ,4-6, •E..!-0 ......C..EV44,-r,.' , le r •-:- -: .....,,-\ 1 • . i -st,i)L____-,-- i.:- ,'Fti _,z _- • g _ ," . 0 ..-;•'•i'''.--. 1 -- -.01-_---- .• LI • -• .e. .- 7, r-_r-T Tr 10 , ! I, . , • • i .,. ! .... -s-c- (_ ' ___-!'- -1 .1 ,-)i le •• i 0 • , , - ,:..„ \ k )5 ._.- --I .. • : . . \ , I . 1 • 2•.-!.. •-• I '.....- I 1... • . ,_, . • , ........,•. - _,..„,./...,....„.„.... • „1-,..., • i : ..-G,.L-0,-,_'..--vi.-,- 0•4.• ' ____---.-_-_-_-_-------- 111.7., ------aims 0,__. A-I .2.V G...2 • I -. 1.4.....,57... • )- \-.)-- 2Y-- -•. ,) -- & -' n 1 5/'''--gi,- ;a *2--'. •-o • - -e. fri.-iz I••I) - - • ., • 9.-2. 8.... i . % \\--„-\ • - .._ • • .) .\ -c. .c. • 0 -- • ..c., o es-27? AN-2. /• 1 --,- As-4 1 - ' .z i.71- -- • • ' - ..... 1.0 • ,_ cENTER1 1 i .,•-i--i, 2 ---1a. 111 . .••• 101,- ,. • ,c.:, =.,, ,.. ... -,•„_••_.,.... .,..„...,..__., . 1 -,,-_ 1 ' ____- ._a‘..,:-..--....L,,__-,--.,,• v.,,, I r. ,n .L__— • . wa ....Ns—-': - Q-coccbcooccc!, • .n.2. ! • -,-I• , bts , ...-----e••-•. t.:,-..",.:.)..:.......a.t,•-1...-....2 t., . ....."../_,E,E.,..-(7.-{,) I— 1 j • ' ' a 1 . 0 4• 4,4-tr.../.. 2 t ,.: `.; •-•_-.2,--1,,, / .. _ __ , 0 -Tg- 3 , 6 . i "2 3• _.. ---------C....Tr-a.,'1.-.) .....-P,' " C: i 0'1 51-,. • . 7)( 0 . - TAMA, .-- . .. 0 .------,.. . 2.41. /11i . ' ... • • •-------- \ 0 IT) ...„.---.--- i- .L---' - -- I Z." '7.; , . _------ - --------.. - '' : :.-----.-----... . • ----'-'7.-538.50. F--I .. • 01 --- ..7". . .. ••l-- --\ ,_...----fa r_. .2.4. ,•. .i„.4 .---7----.6. .--..=-----.. A.68 . . . . . . . 1 _ • ________-------: - __•_.:--";•'-'-'--n. • . ._ . . ..... . • LIGHT STANDARD -.-- - - • . i • --- ...,;:x3CP • • • .• ..---'---- -6.3- , - F.--..-.-2-----.--.,....,- ___..... ..-•"'"->.--r- ..............-e- ° -. , . '1 P‘13 (SR 51 5) • 1--- . JP •-_,..:____ ___--- BE,...,soN RO •—•7..t.-:7,:..."..* 4 MO. -4 _:-........,- ..i.> „.....-__ --_— ______--:::.-;- :. . ""*.'..'-'.... SITE PLAN L....___z..4.--....„--.......---___ F.,•:-.1c.0 POLE OUT CA C TX • • •• .-. : , 9 LICHT STANDARD: MNED INNDESENT FIXRE. 2 i.--- CARPORT LIGHT FIXTURE: SINGLE TUBE FLOURESCENT FIXTURE MOUNTED TO ' • • a WALL MOUNT FIXTURE: INCANDESCENT WALL MOUNTED FIXTURE. STYLE . , SELECTED BY OWNER. I • . • ._ ±I . • . . .:. .--47.,`,.?,---2 . • ''141.5'2 - • . .•E • • .., . ":!a.„ . . __ JohnsonBraund design group, inc. architecture landscape & planning consultants . design • . .. __._ __ . . . — • - ri.uaon:HCOIXCO Pcry ancuRccT • ICLL 10-17-1Y1 . 4 laAFry' SCALE:1-20' µ?0'":1-`r S 1 45'257 E y9•E •5• 197.67 ••.. .....•19(I.•.'Q - S 2 24'53'E 333.57• � ' .. B 1B .. .I ' 7 • / • • • • /// m1 • YP) 0 I CG z • • • �}/ •• I.ICI\. , • • • / / y...- �•�•au�.,.m••sa�c�swemaee�s.1..0�esvE���e f a 1/24 H e.P • •< i4-- ■�.'�'e _ - < f!f(f�i�•e�.�7.��.:.fff .���Cfr,f 5_ j • �����f�••-�•f • /H�1 �..fff�f.•e.•••f �,f.f.fw nioa� sr�- .O�� frr ...i�A�r r 1P w .riwm Czl — • • .��•�� 6' �t7 r,.e:I�u���•�.O e.taff.e•`• •i =� , , • ,. i ._/' � fli- • fir.. •. • -+tl��_' a df sn•r.aG��rsi �--�— o \� ..,,k P M Lo „ 363.0 - � �11k g2 7aariat, O• m F 5---0 _lip: ,1cO la �� / �� �i . 3-® �,a ,��.-�•'i.�,i. '• _ : i.:? sis 41, . 4' lligli ...wvii • 011111110611.114 - .► M 9 • Ho . WW1. % �� A • I .O O . .\ 1 F.F'?59.0 r I 1 •e�N�,s,•• \C I�' 47 �� I. o_F. 51.0 2 ¢ •r ���bill 1 I/lr�"••a'�"�" fff'••o..•f• fffs...000000 a - ri • a rvi Ail 0 011 , WatillibillW' ------- \ rall` .----- triffmatigA- 77.-- ' • •�i��6•• �► r���� a 1+• • ram_ �— H \ram 92G /�' �_E -�AD (SR PROJECT NO //15° �' ,�'�, Ex 0-- 11v �. --------'------ .. LEGEND ee-93 �/�/ EXj � _ • _..— PFSOPEf7CY LIf� (DRAWN By �� .5 // ' - _-g - T�C40 ISSUE°ATE // " --{y---- canny St1I17a7W 5CI,J)ME f I•U•O E 10-17-99 /' / -- E7(ISTlf11 9TUI)M Lf'C. LATESTREV // �� B - f`�., --- CAST111,WUfCr)UnC / / X ''-" -� fE1J STG9FI LIr1E{Ca!LUBa514 c - .N«-• nCW w ro Llrt!roc.uYcc5cni n . OxC17D OS VT?• FF-343 maim acucmm PRELIMINARY GRADING & UTILITIES PLAN MIT 81.EV cnm ELEUOT10r1 0 • v cee�l" Q�n Go ig -G- SGfcc.=_,- -X ST'MCA G�•A�•�.rv',=�vGE: iI :^ =E:- C= (r?) a EAS- ?ROaEI.T`! ,-N.,c - Q N; '� i� 2q• •- S 1 45'25'E 5i 197.87' Tg �9 E ~ " 5 2 24'S�'E V JQ3.57' g 51 ` • . -- • - '`-J . -� ,�O•;.l I'.�:�• Ex T.:.,G l=GE:AT,Oti - '� I:,.• i lI x, J SA/e0 ( ) • ` I .,G l � . a _ • • • •• ..J P••. ow.�n.•ia�0!.+.NNOi�.11i<.i�+s�sA NiiN..�► i[O�lse - ®'l/ - t.c4 _'O0 •! 01�ft �/moos '' - a-- _ ..O _._ �!/ .•6'ff" ) (: - � awe-ow Q •n1 ° d . I � o• - S•ir./I I . +•• ...• • e ;.. . i . do� � � r 1 • _ • ° + .+ � � „ +� � 000000 • • �• 1 1 f o = • ire s • a 1 1 i i - 1i_ fae C _ ZI�I < �?; r• 1 L •Jam_ -J L ° s1 AV • fiI O � i• - • Iq I r- o'dl,Ex�, �•c;-a-='S:o _ • IS I tet I° :oo II ���l�NI '°o a °✓'O aKd`lll±�.o �pyo0'p0 ,2 a 4,fg '° ' I is•�OAOA• l (�11A11 � O', .• off ` °°'� 1 .�� � i,±(mil.°� o _ 11.4 _� �� }° h as �,a`''°°A° povoitr ° � ' • I-' 3 • 0 %i --' X ;i ��--k.: r' c0L, ° ' ,p '� •+-• ' P ITfJ,.7'c LLI - g1�a __ , V ,,.���' •' U .Vo.o0, RECREATION AREA, ha.. •'•••• • VQ.p�. O:� CENTER OI -• ,. • •• • _ - .. "� %�"� +• v, o i ooi �1F „ • .ems ... r - ' Q t� �nns • [•O;� !� O • .L� Op�00ai� +r ��w�.i+rs•��i•' .��. = _ I wr.l .. • - • . . _ • lirje -110 . . _., .., 1� F lJ . 0. as \ 0000 � oa :® �- p- I ,_....__, V ( CCU' ali ,,,_ �(�J.�, +r�sa�i. • ,„ .. _ • ,.. , • i. _ e � r: ( .ten i..- t• off b ++" U li r, k 4; L-czr: imIlle 0� � A•V" • PLANT LIST �' c� *� � - D � 6 d DE6CpIPTIDN _ ••' • AD (SR 5�5� CASTING TREES TO BE SAVED AS NOTED SMALL ACCENT TREES \�e 1,'di, �� �� gENSON RO A:ALDER 0 VINE MAPLE, COLUMNAR HORNBEAM, O K:YAPLE STRAWBERRY TREE, MAGNOLIA 11111� C:COTTONWOOD 16•-18 r • • �1'A C �� SHADE TREES 2°CAL WA%LEAF PRIVET, ESCALLOIII , LADREL, i1 VI ' CP„ NCAVEN.T BAMBOO, ARBORVITE, V1 NORWAY MAPLE,6WEETGUM, SCARLET OAK, WIODODENDRON, BARBERRY, OREGON 2T T1/ LONDON PLANE TREE (i, '.• GRAPE,JAPANESE HOLLY, SKI.MMIA, m )J g UM B1 9 FLOWERING AND ACCENT TREES 1-1/1•CAL GROIINNOCOV[RS G POT _ iI /y ARSTROI:G MAPLE, EUROPEAN BIRCH, _ -- �� LANDSCAPE PLAN \. N PLLMitICHERAYN MOIEVI4NSTFIAWERItIG • _ -, EIIGLISN IVY BT.TOBNSW'ORT,JAPANESE - - AV �_,'_.J SPURGE,JUN2 PER, pWARF PERIWINKLE, • `� - EVERGREEN TREES A NUALS/PERENICKINNICK —_-- • ADSTRIAN PINE, WESTERII RED CEDAR, t- :.�� ANNUALS/PERENNIALS 6'POT • • PARKING LOT LANDSCAPING CEODAR EDAA, SCOTCH PINE --- • _ PARKING LOT AREA: 28,951 .F. PARKING LOT LANDSCAPING REQUIRED: 1,<50 B.F.• J. ' (57 OF Ia,851) - • 1115) PARKING LOT LANDSCAPING PROVIDED: 1,508 S.F. -- _ _-______ ____ JohnsonBraund design group, inc. architecture. ianoscape 8 planning consultants • • . • • • • . . . I. . .. . . . • 4114 ;... • t .r ,,, .4,0i, • ,,,,,m, ' . ,..i ...,.. ).6 ' ►_ . z N7. ip .- --'1\14 ,� , ,• , . A "' v 4,110-_-,,,k- •'44rtIkre‘) /) ___ie Cf) • PO 910 m 'p•44, jLI_' ' \ • < 0 ivil 1 6;9 1,-_, ,i,. ... 77 „\ co < q D / A r itt / iI 1 i t / ,P • I. io11 • !,4!IU��I ,1 I1 fI I i •-- I 1 '' ill I) • (�h E C t j 1J -deg i *� Ilia Nil 5 7 ____....„. :i lox. 3 .;.-.-• •rrlr lm m 0 �F 74 �� ''CRt l . c'► � '• I i PRPBrkTY '4.ab:,', r-I-Irle 5 tom. 0, F • A 4 .23 Greg L.Allwine. AIA — STATE 01 OProtect No 88-s2 Wv5N,NGTON TT CITY LIGHTS APARTMENTS aFNTON. HA. REGISIEREO • 1P(Drawn by ill F08: NORTH BAY OEVEIOPMENT COPPOBATION EANOSCA ARCRii EC' lJ Issue dale 'O-,. -04 633 N.MILDRED. SUITE'0' Lalesl rev TACOMA. MA 98406 12061 565-9400 u06 Man x0 TNO • r , .130 andover park e.. suite 301 scathe, wa. 98188 (206) 431-7960 _ Mel Easter, ASLA c . r i 1 . 1 I I , t I . 1 . I -‘ I . • frt.', 0 rot — . — .ZC ., •-•—=-/.--- i ''' ./N/ /0-.,..,- < . il'1 - • 6 - I . i 1..1,Lia_ g 0 A. 1 . •.__ . F2 • fll 1 C5 c_ 101 1-11 ' C ll'F.2-----.L.:_____J. n - --? r:,,....„„._ 414... , --.1 int , . . .3u, • RTI r 4 cn :-. J ..... , [ i cdroorn e, (-- [NW' '1 -11— i ; nii.4g) i UNIT TYPE A-2 1,1 r Sfav I __Ite.,14_70'iir r—D 1 I —7°)Te— • -11:--1 .1 g ID 0 9 • I LW I iNr N 1 BEDROOM/1 BATH . cts1 1_.' Tri 0 .. - ! ,Z1-4.> IR_ 1 v- i_L___, iii-I'llivi ---- Unii- -732 o.f. Pl...0 - Ge @F. <ri 10.0 1 1 1 ,.: .-,44.., (-1 -i a —zi : itiku.1 • -,--, ID i 1 1.?,to' ; - • • • ; 1-'oroc, - 2.fr *,- • 0 P'41'• 11,11111 I k 0 0 0 1.ArY ________il. 1 f 1 c; -fr. ,„_,i--. < {..129 E---4-ix_ • 0 0 . . L • . .. . . C---) presrl _ _ . . co o--, Lu . 11-5- 1-..t. 01 A..., _IF. - —61 ' . + - - I .4.. i I Mcrste...r. . X ti i•-• 2 WI /0`,e/3` ira;. ..c4 .-- -9! 1St — . I 0 1 IQ i, 0 ,Ll I-11,BU\ . go-meh do I 11 811,,,_,,, yz,,,,,„.., .. . , • 12'7'12.4- ..77-7 IIII _,.1.-7qr. Plo ,tt • . • 1 :: s,1Vr2. ...... d. ./11410 evtry cn••• I F.,,,,t-z co ,-, 0 la D To Lc2.1 _j '-.1],'1,-' - ,..., o' _ ci cs oar' ,--,.07,1 ; Forg A ) 0 x7 # 11:itill' 00 —C. a . . I' -.: „:„7: ...V.4 • . . ' , ! n . . UNIT TYPE A-1 UNIT TYPE C rf.-.c2 -:•' . . i BEDROOM/ 1 BATH . 2 BEDROOM/2 BATH W/STUDY ' . ',';.; rf• i', e,,,,.1 y::..... vh, - 4,8 a ‘,.-f-. UnC.1- - 114 4..f. 14 0..A 0 .E1-,•:, .s.. . . Deck- - 00 94. 2.64- - e,0 4.-F. - ,,, 1 •-1.- - '' 5tora.ey - to ,,-.k. •-i-ore.3 e, - 2.0 ...F F. .1 • . . . ' p 2 ! 1 . . . . _ , johnsonBraund design group, inc. architecture landscape &planning consultants • ,______________ ______._________ ------------------- ------- •- ____ I I !! i• ,i • ., . I i • . II . Ii . . I . 1-<- — I '< W, . 1 - ,o- lot-o' X • , a_eik-on e- 1 I ai 1 .• . . . •Ttc I 3 • • I . I ir __, I , a., u., :iSZEZEim5,- .1- i 1 ... 1 4* i . • . . ..... , . i , • _n 1 , • I - i i I.111<!=. - • C/ I 1 C`.1 I CI 0 I 1 I U I E i L.ralU.417aCI or *la b 'on 5 rate 2 cn ! , , • ' 1 . •'.:1UTTETIRIMI • i IF': 511 'i Av I— _— I,_. c, ct • D , •t-r---. - .,.,• ;._ 11., 8 C..1 I . . 1 i 11— „al r-\--.-..'i' -.. -1 ' 0 A ,, • •<-:1, o 8 ul i-- (6 z s. •ill :n. I 6vot 011tb--I . TD • • • 7.,W , d x g 0 -- -,•-• cc g.. E 22 00i ___. ,•. .• . &ara,je,a tokrtor. 1,..._._„•A_,,,s,„ ,.,.,.,,,,.- .(.:,. .1. • C0\I 1 '''''' ' • . _ i •..• . . " • - .E .'1•,- 31 i g cO —-I. I ) >" _• _4 I- 5 • i-i lk ' <S"-•....J:::171 -r— — r 0 , 1_ 1, ,_ (-7-11 o/1 L.., I I i e . Flaw/ale.a 1WZ • CO I I I I z71-4—PIM FULL atta2ve , l• (4.. 1-4 0' \ I I -- — -__ —c— 1.0 i' akove --,- . U'''.:.5S ..• - — •• - • • il:1-.1 C.'::•:.•'''-. ''.; ' UNIT TYPE B GARAGE BELOW UNIT TYPE B • . '-'•4•.-.<3; :,, . -,:".,...p.::ED 7 - •• 2 BEDROOM/2 BATH :.g.v.:.''.E :..', - •••i 4 4,:e. [2 O,46 - .., 5-1-,,a3e - ao e.-f. .., . ..: . .. •.....- , . . . • p 3 . , . . . 1 JohnsonBraund design group, inc. architectuce,•landscape &planning consultants . _ 11 .________ II _ 1 , Il _ . . ... . ____ --_ _....,_\.__:=._ __._.N. _ .,. . .• , I I f... ---6.-„...citri7• -iAlLii__...1 ,--- _• _-:�.--. _ ;_'--_ il�I1®■'�tl I r!Alir,II:1 — -_;:;moo --.M �� ==2 Q - 1211 1,----.-.=-==er.- -1—.1 li 1,..--E 7' -1-1---2-1111 1111111 1 I -----:Prrrli-_---p..-, irlIP2,2iwg..---_______s_w___,...„. .. ,.:. 1•111111M1=1....t, rME-11111;11 - l -GG EAST ELEVATION • .pIJILDIN6s � 5 = J Mitt `;_=N !�_ !1= N • '(GALE'• Yb,• I- - 1 r�.�^-- , 1 - - I WEST ELEVATION • __e:IJILWIN •e1-+5, . • N 6 r i• HE7N.ft.J%11fre God • — - _ - z O Ga-1PDa-110A •511044•1.55 cN 5:11 Ra,P Prral , z O N ._-�-_ - 4n6 P r�6D W/lab sm.-a I III, - c - 2.6 FP4GA W/GAJ'fNJA16 CjUtrER • I • =�I _— Chi cN� li -- •_-- - �i c=--._..I p.QrUNJri F(WdPA/D�kLE G�.!•LPA ty�q.IS - _I= — � -�� - _ - V Iy 2.4 WNDgi tWci �- -i i _ I- 1 >a�- 1 -ii ._ N[� hid.iIi�il■lid.■■IIui■ � -- 2' tii 1 JE MI �x7t �ra�^ I �� O ., - —.:- ---::__--h w,t.12 .Y ID i■�i■�i fi _s�i■�ii_i■i� =■I�■►Ilii,,-11 �IIffil■j�--_ ii� �i: _ dMom:_ 1414414iiiir:'.1..... :- --_,-, : ': _.-=. __, im. i . -_----=:=- r . g o lilleilffulig- END ELEVATION •_EX111-t2IN65 1-$.5.. WEST ELEVATION • l iJILDIN,2 1+ , 77th1-OIH 2.1,1I1-IPsfk w/ReZ- /1/4 ►-er, _ $a: '0 ti�Lr. /v°y ILO" ors,^,1s0 Yej°-- 1'-0" H g O p__.<-- „,,-:_ ril =,_, • 1 , _gil _ .. .rm.ctio,,,I, ,..m-•MI_'. -:f=-. "MK* , 1=—..7...—. - I.. ix cam ._�—��G:.. Alt ■� rl I a • • ...._ - - - 1 --__— .'..-- -- —.. ,5 ; - ••—. —_ - _— — = —I %cS x: END ELEVATION • tJILwir-16. 1 ,2, +� -1 EAST (ENTRY) ELEVATION • p�ult.-PINIE 1 4-7, IPfZ "/f .p-c ,-r, ,Heo - I • .'arl,e• yt�"-I'_oj1 .v�Le• Yv° i'-o' • �,_ i .c ... :, .. ... l - 1 JohnsonBraund design group, inc. architecture., landscape &planning consultants • • 30U \ ARY A \ i TOPOGRA � HI : S ,_. PVHY A PORTION OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M. • CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON Z • SCALE: 1"=20' [ ' _ —T ate-= -- - — _�� _� _ _ ' II r s 2 24'S3'E �- — p IC _ _ • • \\\\\1 - 1 '*--- LEGEND �\ � _ • BOUNDARY / r _ —�. io8= �-�fI\ r- - � R° y rE RE _ J -- Pi- -. � - .. Y ` — `• • s, —o- -- _ .... ?'�� � ,, — ". R VALVE ' - Q' \o • AMR NET. • :6/\��/— '% co)aN ----A- I (� \ _ • ' °7— / \` l Y'— `` �. U \ / W'�newE ESTP OT� y <oxtrEROIrs RE O "• rf r�/ —0. 3 °T0a REC.. ],s. f —� r O \ r SI • — C{r� � — h. es � r —EDGE o WWI., ,owl / ♦ � .., r I \L \ / � SI . PAINTED..,El.E Q _ 'g r / ' \ f ti � / �, , 1 °•'"[ YSE \ '' Q� -� �- -� —�' o''iz( ' 'eI RM, sr.o] Q POKR/Wr Pp r y� I �E� \ �� r° O•- v// r/ � \ \I`' � 1/ \\\\�, orO• �- —_ ^ u ' '' \.. ��ca„aw LINE { � % �'( 1OQ ' °// //�Il)O \/ ° �m \ • . 4VY0 POST O. Js / I ° . w ��`� �� ro/ f � rr o� Q N,\/_ �) rs}`T tRy Sp .r° \ o o r I9 W O M E / ] C \ ea ° °�r f1 (. \ r O 1 ]°'RO10W1Y,UTM1ITY..NO SIOPE E3Y'i,RENTON 3.R. „�,\— \/ . ",.,....,.4.. -2 ) d \ \ .____-_-_...... ,..„.4, N.]M„I.>.], rI \ J��xfl \ ��� ...-A--"."--....."--..--.-',.. t' ��:7,.:‘.10.....,14. p_.: Ist{QE HIGN 17 : —4liEC73f ' ice- 'q — _ Y V P Iy.�l — /it • ' •t._]] • �- ru[z,.. \�� -� r].- \°.• �(�el..t1\:, I.r ]> e�..z z- zu ~ .w �`,�Y�� • .. • CITY LIGHTS A• PARTMENTST�• �� 3014 Barghauseri . . • �a Consulting Engineers Inc. iIG N. ,. W. u°w Srs-s'oo Land Planning,Scrvoy 8 Erglneoring Speclai1s13 jt V% CITY OF RENTON .ma I COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Planning Division March 1, 1990 Melvin Easter Johnson Braund Design Group, Inc. 304 Main Avenue South, Suite 200 Renton, WA 98055 RE: City Lights File #ECF; SA-087-89 Dear Interested Party: A public hearing before the City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner has been scheduled for Tuesday, March 13 , 1990. The public hearing commences at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you before the hearing. If you have any questions, please call 235-2550. • J Sincerely, c' 44:#4)t Eigi--- -„,_ . Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator cc: Leslie Grove James A. Kurtz 13005 S.E. 208th Street 127 S.E. 189th Place Kent, WA 98031 Renton, WA 98058 North Bay Development Corporation Francis A. Holman 633 North Mildred, Suite G President of Corporation Tacoma, WA 98406 First Presbyterian Church 2640 Benson Road Renton, WA 98055 George Post 1122 South 27th Place Renton, WA 98055 DKE:mr • 200.Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Lynn Rainey ,being first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the VALLEY DAILY NEWS • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week. That said newspapers are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six Public Notice months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON HEARING EXAMINER County, Washington. The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal RENTON, WASHINGTON newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for A Public Hearing will be held by ! King County. Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the Second Floor of City Hall, Renton, Wasn The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Kent Edition ington, on March 13, 1990 at 9:00 A.M '�- , Renton Edition XX , Auburn Edition , (and not in consider the following petitions: CITY LIGHTS supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers ECF;SA-087-89 during the below stated period. The annexed notice a p u h i 1 r to n t i c e A hearing has been scheduled to review the site plan for the proposed City Lights, (Hearing) R 4 016 61 unit residential complex,on a vacant 3.3 acre site, located on the east side of Ben son Road between Puget Drive and South Y was published On March 2, 1990 26th Street. The property is zoned R-3�,,,. medium density multi-family development. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Communi The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the Development Department. SUM of$ 19 .9 5 All interested persons to said petition are invited to be present at the Public Hea ing on March 13, 1990 at 9:00 A.M. t,- 4/2 express their opinions. Published in the Valley Daily News o �y p [, March 2, 1990. R4016 Subscribed and sworn before me this 2nd day of March 19 90 N Public for the State of Washington residing at Auburn, King County, Washington VDN#87 Revised 4/89 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON MARCH 13, 1990 AT 9:00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: CITY LIGHTS ECF;SA-087-89 A hearing has been scheduled to review the site plan for the proposed City Lights, 61 unit residential complex, on a vacant 3.3 acre site, located on the east side of Benson Road between Puget Drive and South 26th Street. The property is zoned R-3, medium density multi-family development. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Community Development Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON MARCH 13, 1990 AT 9:00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. Published: • March 2, 1990 Account#51067 OF RE A 4' V%ID'TICE A. � u O o �JL R • 90 ,a, O912.0 SEP-rol-cP City of Renton Land Use Hearing. Examiner will hold a . PUBLIC HEARING. . in CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL MARCH 13,1990 9:00 • ON BEGINNING AT A.M. P.M. CONCERNING: EC SA o8 89 A hearing has been scheduled to review the site plan for the proposed City Lights, 61 unit residential complex, on a vacant 3.3 acre site, The property is zoned R-3,medium density multi-family development. . 1 ----,r---- HOOT • ,../.__E-: ,'�I ,i• ""„._._.,_i I 1' �:',1 r' MI I ' 7 • ,,„,.._--------___ _, 'r�__, ii rl µ -•.Y---- t C � 1.„--- .-7772,77-7/ ,----.7___,.,_:__, LL, PAOJECT SITE ,•,„...rr.•�+� •�� GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS: Property located on the east side of Benson Road between Puget Drive and South 26th Y' Street. . • FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION 235-2550 - THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT . PROPER AUTHORIZATION CERTIFICATION • I , Mari SLVe, ta• , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT 3 COPIES OF • THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN 3 CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON OR NEARBY THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY ON ,3- 2 _'M . ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn-to before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington • pp �J residing in �G/V�-"bdC) , on the o 2N D SIGNED : 10 .14. day of qA- f/j jgriO4,(Lei—olei C- (� 1 OF RF '3' o O IN DITIcE 2. o 7 9,0 k• 09g1Eo SEPSe.ke City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner will hold a in CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL MARCH 13, 1990 9:00 ON . BEGINNING AT A.M: P.M. CONCERNING: ECF;S CITY LIGHTS 8 89 A hearing has been scheduled to review the site plan for the proposed City Lights, 61 unit residential complex, on a.vacant 3.3 acresite, The property is zoned R-3, medium density multi-family development. •----- 1 III . _.._._ --- _ _ I 1ZAMG OLLM - _/-_- 'mix LCHOOL-1 I ----- i - • vrl cnY:JR.J110M I I' �,__1 �. ..CMOOL 1 -- /.r ----� - I I I• /• 1 II in nc 1 I I /__-_- I -_- 1 I 1 I 1'1• 'i _ r r --mil `` O r' s ; \is. � j I � �_ yr,•'' � PROJECT SITE] / II�r�Si.rTCRUM c>w*�M 1 I // ///� III 1 i- --;\_, • : ,, • ` . I 1 ' , Y1CT .W...KTYLEXTa 1 ,,.,, . 6- \ . '2X-I'gr-----j j'--j7: 7-26 -Q, i ._„_ • / 24.?\ ` ----------:' --- - \ c-)1:---blz)„,---, ,q ,--.-----1____,_u : /- , jam- - �! �-S/ •� .._,-_-' 2 --- • -� \ L1rGi..T�1LY.LY MC11.0017Lll • 3ENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS: Property located on the east side of Benson Road between Puget Drive and South 26th Street. . FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION 235-2550 rHIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Transporta(idn and Traffic PLANNING • DES I The Transpo Group August 23. 1989 TG: 89366.00 Mr.John Miller North Bay Development Corporation 633 N Mildred, Suite G Tacoma.WA 98406 SUBJECT: CITY LIGHTS APARTMENTS TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS Dear Mr. Miller. Thank you for asking The TRANSPO Group to assist you by providing a transportation impact analysis for the City Lights Apartments in Renton.Washington. This letter summa- rizes the results of our analysis. Project Description The City Lights Apartments is a proposed 70-unit complex located on the Old Benson Highway. south of S Puget Drive.as shown on Figure 1. The project is proposed for occupancy in 1990. The City of Renton has requested that a traffic impact analysis be performed to evaluate the project's impact to PM peak hour operations at the S Puget Drive/Old Benson Road intersection: and to determine the project's pro-rata share to the construction of a future signal at the SE 31st Street/Old Benson Road intersection. Project Trip Generation, Distribution, and Assignment Trip generation for the City Lights Apartments was calculated based on rates published in the Institute of Transportation Engineer's publication Trip Generation(4th Edition. 1987). Based on these rates. the project will generate 47 PM peak hour trips. 32 of these trips would be inbound and 15 would be outbound. Project trip distribution was based on existing traffic patterns in the area. This is appropri- ate since the site vicinity contains a substantial amount of residential development with trip characteristics similar to the proposal. These patterns were established based on traf- fic counts at key locations. The resulting distribution is 75 percent north and 25 percent south.as shown on Figure 2. Project trips were assigned to the local street system based on this distribution. The TRANSPO Group,Inc. 14715 Bel-Red Road,Suite 100 Bellevue,Washington 98007 FAX:2061747-3688 2061641-3881 s Mr.John Miller The August 23. 1989 TrarispoPage 2 Group S Puget Drive at Old Benson Road A manual PM peak hour count was performed in August 1989 at the S Puget Drive/ Old Benson Road intersection to evaluate 1989 existing conditions. A previous count per- formed in February 1988 was used to estimate growth rates which were applied to the 1989 count to develop 1990 baseline conditions. The growth rates ranged from 16 percent to 40 percent annually. The project trips were added to the 1990 baseline to develop 1990 with- project conditions. Intersection level of service (LOS) was calculated using methods outlined in the 1985 Highway Capacity ManuaL The resulting level of service is shown in Table 1. and calcula- tion sheets are attached to this analysis. Table 1. S Puget Drive at Old Benson Road Level of Service LOS Delay' 1989 D 36.4 1990 Baseline E 45.7 1990 W/Project E 46.3 t Delay is expressed in average seconds/vehicle. . The intersection currently operates at LOS D. In 1990.the intersection will operate at LOS E with or without the project. Per City of Renton guidelines. no direct mitigation is required. since the level of service is the same in the horizon year with or without the project. Accidents - S Puget Drive at Old Benson Road Accident history over the three-year period of June 1986 to June 1989 was provided by the City of Renton. During this period, there was an average of 18 accidents per year. of which 13 were rear-end accidents. The accident rates are not unusual at a high volume slgnnl- ized intersection like this. One contributory factor to many rear-end and some of the angle and approach turn acci- dents is the signal phasing pattern. The east and west legs operate on the same phase with no exclusive left-turn lanes or phasing. An average of four rear-end accidents occur annually for west-to-south right turns. This Is probably due to the high volume of these turns. In addition.many vehicles make a right turn on the red indication(at least 50. percent based on field observations) and may rear- end vehicles in front of them while looking over their shoulder to determine when they may Mr.John Miller The August 23. 1989 Transpog Group merge. Right-turn overlap phasing may reduce the incidence of these rear-end accidents if the indications are clearly visible for approach traffic. The project will contribute 35 PM peak hour trips to the intersection and is expected to have little effect on accident risk at the intersection. SE 31st Street at Old Benson Road Previous studies have shown that the intersection of SE 31st Street at Old Benson Road meets the Manual on Ung-orm Tra„fic`Devices warrants for a traffic signal. The City of Renton has begun collecting pro-rata shares to assist in funding this signal based on the project traffic's percentage of total entering vehicles in the project year PM peak hour. The City Lights Apartments will contribute 12 vehicles per hour to this intersection in the PM peak hour. This represents 1:15 percent of the 1990 with-project total entering vehi- cles. Based on an estimated cost of$140.000.the project share would be$1.612. Project Driveway Operations The project driveway onto Old Benson Road E will operate at LOS A for left and right turns exiting the site and LOS E for left turns entering the site in 1990. This is an acceptable level of service for the driveway. and no mitigation is recommended. Summary The City Lights Apartments would have no major impact on local intersection operations. As part of the City of Renton's program to collect pro-rata shares to assist in funding a traf- fic signal at SE 31st Street/Old Benson Road.the project's pro-rata share would be$1.612. I trust this will satisfy the City of Renton's request for a transportation impact analysis. Please contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely. The TRANSPO Group. Inc. >9cr-' Erin A. Bard.P.E. Transportation Engineer EAB/ldk Attachments t >5 0 •-i Iv, "_ -`• -t nrvtn---.-� • _�_1._...._.. 4><wz�asw4 �`;' /C" �./,.,. . w.flPd1, • N� I 13 -r--. -t._- -N — �.-__ .-- .GURE/NGTON ORTHCRNC. RR In ��ti r�"• '� I ~ • —L� 4•• .,,eACKati�r.r•'• .771...•• � i• j fe I D3 D I6NGACNE r-iOnl'•• �� •ae1l�;S ii ioN • m = I 79TM Av S _1OrGVIEW AV S N �<1 P •rs G�'171.:• • • HtIoilfdi;:.1 ;`'1 jL i h �.,,,s,. Cl) lt QDTN S ,,.. .. .S4. f 4 i �, o `.'_�!*-r r: iY::1R•1titE .'r:1i " I te OAKESOALE i AV •I SW, « I - PACIFIC�V ySVI{ iii. N ' +r , I N I ....._.....' EMr • .re ._._.-•-•-•-•-•-•--._._..._.'_.._ rtAym0NoI - _- 11}C( ' •i •l,'..YRAYMQN.. iikld .c21.,\.py,,v;.• }: . M I AV SW !_ `,q� Ee N r �_ -� 95 t!a I t; .:E3EN�CA .r �, ``__ Y ilitiD ' ';gam o II a �--E . ' • = .I . 4... `='' :i.i: ! ..to - i W j II FRWY ..j .r ; .1 -i•f'•�'. ;1' 0 Z iH .. /ill N u►K T ,, k ;;'Izd�. rr. p:7:; • T LBO --t.A. • a PUCK AV s �nt'et '�r‘°' t 1 �i �e° v, v S O Eft. t. 4 •» ,� - I�m ksn S ASMAT CK �' :.,:: !�,_ • I . i 1 ' ....•.. 1 � d' 11HI.T .RTH , AV:$• ;!? ' - - , s x1VvOR1N = room Is 1 G I )�S ,,. y 1..•y • r, 1��� ,t1 to C1 i IA 111 1 -' !.;:.., !� .... �01 a' 't 11 . •Z /A [1 m� sm'�,y- . Ni Av H nor ....Jr,- a: ITHERS y. �} + .t�+: 2 I N . 1n xi" o IY CIS R ,° s'3 a ''`�` S*� = S C SM.11gAS C �' .►', 1�' )► y• 1 •.a N iii :1`'e• i t�., .�vH f to, r IA .1 M Int•••11,Ir0:"1 .f...,••a..:..� •pri t�`ti•"1: �iM m L _ C1 .�—— _.. _._ _..— in-• N �^ ,lid��F.{ti i • �n '� _IO2ND ,s( 2 n te 14, j z S• HAINC`). %KOS a • .i.:d,,. •:."• .Y:1;.: r4 AV e(oRs j 1 1 103w1 AV SF = e, ,11Y4 N ti01�... .. i';.:<:... ,X �" j I / r�` ��11 43 n s cEDARf • ._.�_� Pp 3E:v ,_-IfirtL . AV SE/ AV S ion O N 1 b CEOAVL $ �.�„ ICs1H NL sr +. a • o N = _ ,.` 's �1 i `__tOGtil Av_SE 2 i �I s.. y I • 1N, ; 107111 AV''. �'St • in L* V``V 1»_tom sr. . +. ' g" o �qti - IV s`` • • Y CID -s4 T '^ S E �mks.....T.,--_-iaAr sr_ Y ' ''� v� • _,p 109TNA�V�_ 9FaWIOfr 8 = r'6' = � " ,► >Q �A Cr t^ to �Qs�' 'EY 1 C) •- ? 1S = o to w 1nI• ' �. I� •J.N S •y♦ ♦�l;rs 1.,.:.. . @ g ; •+ H y N' y ly r- swill.AV$F rN Ix N• �'a r�x 2 III:.i. ,, • •N •R[F \•, i1•;1,,.T 1 .»... Sl•v = v ,.":-1 N 1 }Q ���� b fY /{i'1�i,fIv lu 1� ■ NN[vnCR f7J 111 AV ' RC't[NCR CT l[14 SI1i `�p 1 111 AV yal ,1P� .. 1 AV SI In r � r its�� /YY� �. Q D •/• $f I .a r LINCOLN 1 jff•;. is 3 1101N AV E loon S "' I ..�(.K••r" / CA •$t flt/�I .. �,x, • D`x7 I. y •CN' ��1� IIIT11 AV :,E h. o m .•� r�� L 1 `-'LUNCOLN CT TIT!• • '' 4A/. . to a e,. .,,.,.,• :.: .,„ . - .., .e .% , i, , , , , . North 0 . dr ciP- gs. ef 0 ,P) 4S> 0 °V.o o m o > 13 < o• it) Aocio cv cc co 25°A 8 PI/get/3r q0% -- -) %t c x . 25% i a to tri 0 st I ._ I° S 2'7th St I N. _; . I •. v J ..i . N.-—.-....... '\ SE 29th St I • • I • • • I L. • 1.---...........-....-. 0 MEMO.1 0 1 .. ...1 SE 31st St , • „ • X . , • 5% . • l I • _ No Scale CITY LIGHTS ' Figure 2 • ay.The APARTMENTS TRIP DISTRIBUTION transpo Gap . . - , • . - •- .INPUT- WORKSHEET ' Y . _....... . , :lntersection:BENSON RD S, ATS PUGET DR. " . ' '-' ', 'Date:SUS/29 :Analyst:EAB ' TimePeriod AnIyzd:PM PEAK Area Type: CBD XOther : ;Project No.89-366 City/State: 1955 EXISTING COND:TICN5 ; c:LUME AND GEOMETRICS !BENSON RD S ' N/S ST. E1495) : , . b, i i en. 4,., SB TOTAL i 1 1 2 1 . - . , (,1--17r'. : : : ; ; 12.0 ; , ; < v ) : 12. ..., ! 12. :.', . : ;N) 5 511 57;: F7 TH ;.T : 7. 6 - NORTH v (---T --- I2, 0' -1 , • I-12,0'-1.TH---''.‘ -cv---i.",-.- -1 ; I-12.0'--TH---. • , . .:.E. ;7IrY IN DIAGRAM 1-12.0' -R1---v : , •;.-1 -7,Es : : :.:w.Ps,isne widths : LT TH Pi ! by la:-ie ''• 35 ; :::. :.! : 12. 0, r:. '- :-. =,117.9 :ocz:ioris - : i ;......1.. : : ....-:7. • sc7re 15g7?Is I 9.307, , 763 , I 2 1 101 -,2s-,ds E/5 TOTAL - , - v 182 : —FAT-71:,..„ AND ROALWAY CL:NDITI0N5 -F"''','. % HV ; Adj.PI:g.lane ; Buses : =HF I '7.1-,4. Fej , YiN sr.f- . T1 (1-. ; T.:.p,-_.•; ; --- ;---- ; ; : ; : F3: -0.0 : 1 .0 ; N ; 0 : 0 ; 0.59 : , 0 ! Y 1 .0 I N : 0 : 0 ' 0.59 ! C ! 7 : :=: : %13: +2.0: 1.0 I N : 0 : 0 : 0.89 : 3 : • SE::-2.0: 1.0 : N : 0 : 3 ; 3.57 : 0 : Y ; 15 : 3 ; .-3raje:.•-up,-down Nb:buses stopping/hr min. Tim:,,n,c: 1,ir,.. c.',-eer-• 4r_lt- > 4 o.hls PHF:peak-hour factor g.maneuversinr Cnf.Peds:Cnflctng peds/:-.r Ar:-. Type: Type 1 -5 , , _ - • . SING . . _ - : * : " 1 • ; , • it * : * * **> ;<***) :<** ; (***** , . , A I : + . I S. ; ' : ; . . •• : + : ; • : A ; <** . ; . **)! *****>: . , . ' , * : *, , * . : * ; * % I . , ; --- ----; 1 ; ; ; • G= 25,C; 5= 43.0: 5= 34. 0: 5= 66. 3: G. :2. 0: 2.-: 0. i'..j S. ,. . ,',.. ; G. , .7.g !7-..R.:. 3:Y4.R= 31Y+R= 3:Y+R= 3'. .1-PR= ‘c., V+F= ..!;Y+R= 0: Y+R= 01 ; . ! , , . . 17-tmdiAct ; A ; A : . , . • - • . __; ; Frotected turns: 7***^ ocloo- : Permitted turis: -,--,-+." . : Cycle Lerigtn ISO Sec! . _ _ • : ....: . -1. -iE TRANSPO GROUP, Bellevue, WA, using NCAP by PSI , • » r^ °-'1-''' FInter•secti•on:BENSO'I RD S •ATB:;'F`UGET',.Dfi ' - . ' rate:8/18/89 . . . • " ' Analyst:EAB - TimeFeriod Anlyzd:FM PEAK • Area Type. CE".0 Either ! !Project No.89-36 City/State: 1989 EXISTING CONDITIONS : VOLUME ADJUSTMENT ,WORKSHEET 1 : > : J : L : :Appr. , Mvt. : !,•y • I: -1. I ! _ :.•I : ::,• b 1 Lane 1 !� 1 • 1 t'c.t. 1 Flow \..+i:e I"1%: rt ::V NiF!il ter 1 f4u i t Prop. , Er: , I 1 '✓lf.\.IYQi �":-:sir Pate UI o,..ia :: .n !...: i o1 iU4Clizr Plow i•% : i.f • : (,. _ :Factor ! 'I' :Grp Vg:Lades :Fctr,11: V!Vp, ' L! :Ir FI : ? r ) ' __....— : I I 1 I I • : LT .i . . 3" Z3 : 0. 04 T 1_ , I . _ , . . r - i 1. `.: 1 1 1 .00 r -_ 4 i :. . _ •r..T 4._7 . i . C.I ."K +f 1 : • • I .. .. , ,is`. .. . i-t 1 ♦ I 1 i.i '•r _;,I 1 . . f' , i • i i.. . -.1 , . .8 i • ': , A i 1 8 1 : 1 i 1. 00 1 8 1 : 1.00 I. . N: : : 2 -- : 273: 2 i 1 . 5 1 2E7i * , . . . , _ I 11 . 11 . • : 1 . 0 1 , : 5 j. SC : . 651 : .1 i 1 . 1)u i 5 1 : 1. 0:. L" 7. - ; .;j; 4 2 n I r. 1 .0 • I : - :.b' 1 : f. t: 1 1 .OO 1 • - i —_ \,1 r 1 \V f't: • fl li R t :: :LANE GRO * _ = FERMTTD a# = -'ROTCT♦, . PER l t D7 1 1_r.IiE .: �•L :i rri;Fi�• •ir h:n r.«.T� f+i3• 4 :C.. E (. r + ; ii I : . : 4 4 4E : ** r : : i , is7$�i.` 1 ffi� ' I HE TFeA;•PS GPCOU , E:ell .ue, WA, using CAP by PSI .1 , ,"• ':,I,nter•'E'ecticm EEN:.ON RD •S 't TS PUGET• DR 'Date: ' ,. ':AnelystiEAB TimePeriod' Anlyzd:PM PEA}; . Area Type:• '' CBL' XOther:- :Project No. E9-366 City/State: 1989 EXISTING CONDITIONS : SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET • : 1=-- 12 GF:OU l�e•tl. ,ND. . Ln. W. ,*+i•yVehiGrade : Pkg. :DusBik:AreaTp:Rt Trn :._} TrnAd1E5t •------- • Et. : :.i Fp; Fhv , Fg : Fp . Fbb Fa ! Frt : r:I t F1,.:F:t r _ . F . . ii_r;:-_, , --- , 1 : : : : C`._O - - __= G "---- - - - 3 t 1 - 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 .: . - • _. 2 1 . (., -il/ . ' e1 , 1 .000i 000i 1.000! 1 .000! 1 .0'0; 0. 99,- -_7.. . .._ - l� � Si. T�i... 1 .0031 1 .000; 1.000: 1.000 ! l.:•u J t l: 1 .000; : .....- 1 , i i • ... .. - 1 - _ . , . . '? :.: +i. ?vJ : 1 . 000: 1.O00: 1. 000 1. 000; 0. 995 . _ i • 1.` ' • - - - 1 r .i.: - _ � ' . : . 1251 1.000: 1.000: 1 .000i 0. 85o: 1.00 ;.500 _ - 0, 9h5 0.990 1-000: i.000i 1. 000! 1.0001 0. 350f 1684 • .-: - . - - . Ci. 0. 9 5i 0. 9`. - , 1 .00 0i 1 .000: 1 . 000 1 . 000; i . , _ 1 1 C•_ . , 4. T-, 5 i 0. 9901 1 .000: 1.000! 1. 000! 0.85`v 1 . ... : ! __ • • - .i _ . . i . i 1 .010; 1 . oc'o: 1.000:' 1. 000'; 1 . 000; 7:. 9501 i i_J .._ !' • a•?. -. • . .t:::.,, . . 995; 1 .J10: 1 .0001 1 .000: 1 . 000; 1 .000: 1 . ::0 i 3618 •,_ , 3 - . 00:. • - . ` 95 i . . _111i: 1.0001 1.000! 1.000 :. I:. 850: 00:_ . _ r 3 6 . t__ti E a _..r _.ii'._Rti' _ ** PROTCTD, +++ = PERiTTD, 1.## = FRtOTCTL & PERMTTD) . n 1 1 I . 1 i i, • « , . : t •, y i • TEE TRANSPC GROUP, Bellevue, WA, using NCAP by PSI :l-M. T ': Iritersec't•i on.'BENSON SD S: ATS'.PLGET DR e:8/18/8y' L. `,.7:;`. :Ana.yst:EAB'''- -. Ti mePeri od AnI yzd:PM PEAS' Area. Type: CED XOther ', . :Project No. 89-366 City/State: 1789 EXISTING CONDITIONS • • : SUPPLEMENTAL WORKSHEET FOR LEFT-TURN A USTMENT• FACTOR, f LT : I V^i3T VAR:ABLES;COMPLTA T-C NS • } EB , .F , NE t SB ' --- ---- ---- ---- ---- :Cycle Length, C ‘sec) : ' . :Effective Green, g (sec! : , . . !Number of Lar p., `r' : :Left-Turn Flow Rste .} ru ;F'r3portia4 of L. PI : . :Opposing Lanes, No . • :Opposing =ion: Pate, _ : : ;1 - :Pt i y- ; FP F :Fit tFi, N - 1 ) /N i . , • T:-E TRA:':!BP SROU^ , Pei i vue , v'i41 ,is:r,j NCAF t v P_I ' , • .r • . , . . . .•. '. . , • ' .- , ,.,,,:,,'fl---- - , , ,. ,:, ' :-- '. ' -- ',- -- •:-.,,Oti:.,,,- ,„:,-,, • ,-: lintersectioniBENSOW±RVSATSPUGET ,Dic.ply'r, -! „,IC , Date:8/18/69: TimePeriod. Anlyzd:PM PEAK, ',' :.' Ai-ei Type: Cliff XOther : :Project No.69-366 City/State: 1969 EXISTING CONDITIONS CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET LAE GROUP : 3 : 4 : ..0 i 6 : 1 ; 2 : 9 : -----------1 Adjusted :Ad. Sat : Flow Ratio • : Green 11..n.Srp! vIC : Crit . : Rate :Flw.Rt : ; Ratio • : A2r.--r . :Mvt. : v : s 1 vis : g 1 J_- i7,,vpt-, : X !Lane : ; : ;=======; : ,;:. . - 0.263 - : .36.7 : 1311 " - ; C. 0 367 ! 558 : . 365 i - . . - 3517 ; 0. 131 ... : 0. 37 : 12E5 0. 355 ; - , : - : 15(.iC • •.:.0-.'",2 - : 0.367 •: f5C ! 0. 142 ; -- 1 - : 1684 ; C.:. 107 - : 0. 1:9 ; 234 1 0. 774 25;7 - ; 3546. : :*).381 - : C.I.. 169 ; 670 H 0. 42S ! **4 - 0. ;),07 _ . ; 0. 169 ; 265 : 0. C.:,,79 : - -- : 1716 : 0.379 , - r C.:.t4 , 678 : 00 :07f, - : 361S : 0. 297 - !: 0.44; : 1609 : • 1 - . i :::• : 6- - ! I53S 1 0.0C4 - : 0.444 t 687 Lost Time/Cycle,L= --9-.6sec, S(y/s)ci= 0;723, Xc=0, 76 : - : GFOL:P DIAGRAMS-t*** = PROTCTD, • +++ = PERMITII, ##4 = PROTOTD & PERMTTDI : - ! IL : C ; . . ,3: ; • ..' --. • . • . , • . . . . ****):: *ii*4 ! . '- '' : * • . ' -- • .; , ; . ; • * . : • ' .; • ' . ! . . . . . . THE TRANSPO GROUP, Bellevue,- 14, using NCAP by PSI . • -• , . . . . .... . ' • . . . . , • " • . . . . , . . . . • . . . • .. ,. ,. , _ • . . • -. . . , . . . . . ,..,,.. . . • . . ." * • . .. , . . ' . . . , . •. • . . . • ' • , . • . . . ' . . . . . • . . . . .. . . . . , . , . , . . ., . . . . . , • • ..: . • ., :Intersection BENSDN 'RD:•.SATS' PUGET DR , „ Date:8/1S/89 . i' ' • -, ;. • • :Analyst:EAR• ' ' • TiteePeriod A.^:lyzd:PM PEAK Area Type: CPD XOther: :Project No.89-366 City/State: 1989 EXISTINGG CONDITIONS : : LEVEL-CF-S RVICE yiDR!.SHEET . : •: ' : First Term Delay . : Second Term Delay 1Tat.Del,ay_&_LOS • 7 l : : • 1 10 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 3 LANE i 3 1 4 1 5 : 6 . 7 i � 1 '7 1 : 1 1 l E 1 i S GROUP; v/c : Green ; Cycle: Delay : Lain: Delay :FIr Lrsn :Lnrie U1:1 : Ln ; Apprch:Apr. : ` f 1 t. t 1 1 1 • : _ _ r 1 • Ratio; ra i0:1_ no�.l fi li7r'nLRF�1 6t . 1•'rii.tLl,' .%ei �.1! 1 _`I : C:'laY Il-Ian' 1 1 21 ^ 1 C 1 : ; eve ; F'F _'_J Ye:l i LCS sec/veh: T131 1 cl A I t3/i. 1 L 1 mil:`: 'V$;, �,ii�z � �tLr r t • -1 1 _.____1 --------'1__-•-- ' 1 1 : 1 I 1 : : 1 I 1 . �Lj I••.: l�. •8 1 0 -r: 1 V. 2� : 1. - _C. - : _1 - :L D! y 1 1♦4 1 V.�I l:% ♦ ��. \j 1 .. • • w.•1 3• 1 . • _.. • -. \.._• J\' .. 1;•1• !�• 1! i C: \%. 65 : 0.367 • 120.01 . . 1:. .1.`• . 0. 85 •., . i . 1 : 1 • :till: t1 0.35E1 • 77 - . - `. . • . . . • 2� • 1 : , I I) i� •.�. 1 �i!; ¶ C• ._C i; it C.J. J J : : 0. 142 ...3r • 12. . _ i __E.-94 : 55C - . \ 11 .%_ 24.s i _ 4 :� •8. NB, i 1:. '!iv i . . z :'7 . L.`.•�. . i. . ._ . i•• c-.. . .. L� I - . �•E•,t _i i Jz r ..i i E C: 1. . .. , : 0. 189 , . r . .5 -. ' . . . .°• � . ' C iG+ ._G.. 1.11 :: G. 1 i{. 9 0_ ; .I..i4 , .Gfl. : +. ., v 18 ,. , - i 9, 1 . - 3S 1 E:. _ .41:.Y: 0. 444; 160. .': ti . . .H E, C. ry !1. 3_ 2G. i B: D 38.451 D 1: 0. 009 1 0.444: 18;. 0: . .9 i 66..: C% 4'. .:. . 0_ : C : . 'iintersecticrt Delay .36: 42. . secive, nt rsr><ti -,•. ..D : D . Table 9. 1 .1 1 ;LANE GROUP DIAGRAMS-C*** = . . _r.- D, 4-4- = P E M T , : 3: a PRC DTD FER1T-SD3 : : : .A .. 1 C. i L 1 E . : ' .- :: ' * • .: • * : 1 - : * 1 1 . . ; : - 1 I i ! 1 Y 1 • 1 1 THE T RANSPO GRCUP, Bellevue, WA, i,sa rrc` iNCAP by PSI : INPUT WORKS1iEET ' ! '', y ,t, ' lelntersectIon'BENSON .RD, S ATS PUGET: DR:' ` , , '' ;:+i•: Date:8/18/89 "'' '., . : . ' ,Ane,iyst:EAB '' iimePeriod Anlyzd:PM PEAT: Area Type: CBD XOther ; !Project No.89-366 CityiState: 1990 BASELINE . _. ,JDLU iE A?tD GEGMETRIC:; ;BENSON RD S N/S ST. : '/t 1' - t i C188833 : : Si ^ : •• SE TOTAL : 1 2 1 ; - ; i ; 1 ; 12. . : : 412 \- i 533 . - y v : 12.0 • 1 12.0 : -WB TOTAL: i s S : 14f] 3 ; R 1 TH LT : 40 V , \ORTii v i.---RT-12 (+ -1 . <--_TH-_12 . 1--12.0'-+ TH-- . .v--LTH-12.0 '--1 1-1.-. 0 Tip---, -1',. f-• 1 . .l i. :_ . n.' 'A'• 1-2 r. y -Rf ---V -. S . 1 . _.-•. ea— I Niit .,: : LT IH RI : S PUGET DR , '. - str:t_ .. 40 ; 12.0 : 12. 0: =/W STREET . ki. - Z.- . - 1 12.0 1 'may • _L 236 . n !. ,� ,. . , 1��: �' ..Y .�:-.c 5 :583 r7^ i�ni'.rEi:. P2175tF7 ui.it':r}^ . il'•r- . , :rr• : ii:, ,1r. :Ni... : , (pd/`r) ; YiN :Mn.Time, Tps! _ ;-- _ 1 1 1 t : 1 E ! {•'' . 0: i .0 : .; 0 . D : la.8 V 9 D� E Y : 18 : ' : . i•I:•f•.j.li: ; .0 . % : !! : d : 0.87 : If : 18 : 3 ' :2: - ; :S2:-2. CI: 1.0 ti : V 0 : . 0.89 : 0 : Y : 15 I ': r - - 1 : ;r -• r: :sal ,•-tic s:. N_:buses stoppirig/hr Min.Timing: min.green for 1 l RV: e:f. 4 14:•:1 = F"-:r peak-}iour factor 'crossing pedestrian • WI:C,: r, oar,euvers;n rf.P'eas:Cnf l ctng peds/hr Arr.Type: Type 1-5 , , i-HAS;:',,S • : 1 ! : 1 , . , i : r*:: 1.:*** *. 1 :a:* :\***** : ; : : : Y . , :J , : , 1 .1 1 1 1 1 r 1 1 : ; ri i ;f* : : **:: • *****J: : ' : : ; : : * * : v . : , 1 :r- a'- - 9. ;. : 2= .-6. :: 27 71. : Sr. 60. J• n_ 0.0 : Sr- . .0! 2= 0.0: G= a. .!: / n= 3: r"=•R= 1•1-R=i::g , , �R= _ . .;-R= : . 01'r+;,= 0:Y+R= 01 t'*R= 0: : 1- - : : : : : ; • . Protected turns: ***i' ^°coif'' : Perr•,itted turns: ++++' : Cycle Length ISO Sec: ..r THE T °N `C D . ; • �>.,_ +R�: .1 �,E:°��F•, Bellevue, .�A, using NCAP by PSI , �,'ia: sf'. nterse' tion'•BEIZSONi. T fi L,ET "^ , . _t .. - , ',', .�.'�` I c. RD` S'' A-S� U � ..�, 'tre�ei8!•1,_/89.. , . • , 1Analyst:EAB ' Time Period 'Anlyzd: r''M PEAK ' Area Type: '-' CBD XOther . • ' :Project No.89- 66. City/:tate: i°9" BASELINE : .• 1 ! VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORK SHEET ' ' 1 1• 1 , • : 4 , 3 : 6 ; ! 1 V • 9' 1 10 1 11 - . :Ar. r. : Mit: : Mvt. : Peak Flow ; Lana 'F lw rt :Nimiri•r : Lane : Adj. : Prop. 1 Flow :' r•Ir : 1 1 S',�i,i:Iii HourHourt;c_ _ i .`�Y.i.t: i s_�i `J'' �Lj t 'i1 :� : F 1 : 1 : iV;.h: !Fact vp ' rt- 1� i ••' 7� ¢h1 LT or :`T •is : i_ r!e Ftr ,L1: ♦ Sr , 1 r' .F ' ' _ -h . >--4; 7 x . !1.1 , =•r i. ! 1 1 0.04 • 1• t : LB 1 TH : 95+ : 3.Ci7 .. ..i 1 • : 2 , 1.0S : 1173: * - • RT ..:v_. . _ , 23 WB TH. : 412 ,, ..:' 7 C+ _ ..:i' , 1.05 : 53. ! t : , RT : .i : 0.0 _ 1 , . . 00 : 91 ; 1.00 RT • , 1 ! . • Y Z L; 0.i39 __.- 2'v-5 1 , 00 • I.6 fifr• : I.0 0 L T 1 I , TH ; .r b , ...: 1. •t':v 1 •- : 1. 05 , •t 20: * • i ' ' . :: • `,r. 11 : ., 1 _ _ 1 1 i+U i 11i. 1.00 ..i r • . _•___.._ _...._. _._. .. ...-.__ _..... _ _._--.-�- __-..... i_.._-__._ ______ i_._- ...- i - t LT 1 -r" 1 - : G ppLti i i .11h : SB : TH : . 11/G . l+. Y , ; , _. . : 2 1 . 05 : 1354 : * : 1 T 5 1 Y , - :. . Ll r n.i : . '2. f.{Y .: , .r'i ; 1 .L.1�i ; P: 1.00 RI 1 ' '. ', ... .:LANE S CUP, DIAGRAMS _ _ GROUP, Dltvv:�n,•:..-Cii'�e -. . ,.. , � _ -7, F'ERMTTD. '#r#'.= fiftOTCTD & :fiEit1'1TT::.l : • : A •• . C •• : , C * : * : **** : **** x*** . *** ; : 1 * 1 , t THE TSArSPO t._ B l : e• ,..:e r:iy, asi _ NCAP by psi - 1 ,', ,' s,.nte'rsecti.,<r.. .LIENSG.J' RI S ATS:.PUGET 'DR' • . . . Date:B%,18/B9 i,!..: '1 • :Analyst : EAR TinePeriad Anlyzd:PM PEAK Area Type: CBD• XOther: Project No.2 •-Sep' City;State: 1990 BASELINE . 1 SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET. : LANE : a : S : 6 : 7 1 8 : 9 1 10 : 11 1 .i2 : 1. 'r•` 1•�'• :N� ' H r' h1G I Pkg. :BusBik:A p:R` Trr,ILt Trn :Ad iSat .,n,:,,r : i �. . , v. : �r1. �. �y� a. orade 1 Fbb real -- --. Ea 1 r : Fhb : Fa : Frt 1 Fit 1P1 . .:r.� iJ i T v. Fhv 1' I r y t•f% 1 1'a t I ipi:V i : r;a. •- -••- ----- •-'----- : 1 � ,1 1 - 1 S 1 f T r T 9--9 1 1 1 T 1 . _ . ._ -n ._.i Y-I:i 1 r I i .C•_..1.% 1 �'-'r. . iT. - f - 1 1 1 ' 1 ' 1 1 1 I 1 99 00 000: 1 �1 1 101 1 . '0J1 .99C: C75 :_ri .. G ii i• 1; . :i i 1! i1. 7-^i i. . :+C]� 1•v•!0 r i.V!j 0 1 i .�!,.4 1 Cj J J i.� : a : 1:--,;.,: I , i . 0C , . . L7 Cr 1 .0001 1.000 1 1. 00: 1.000 1 f 8E0: 1 . 100 1 1 522 1 1 4%V�. 1 �. .G1`I f 1 CIUv ... ._ _...___. ._ -__._-- _.----._ 1 1 • 1 ' . 1 I 1 r ..,:1 is ; 2 1. . . -'s. cr-P.7..1 0. 7251 1 .0001 1.0001 1.000: 1 .0 0: 0. 9961 3513 . . . . . . ' y . 9 f1 0. 9135 : 1.0001 1.000 i 1.000 i 0.850 1 1. 0001 :5 j+. -1 1 1 : --„--- . 1i : 1 +: i U • • 1 t1.0001f S r t t 1 0 1 0 q--11 1 - . . ,.. . 5y. ' ;.9 ;� I 1..+0'v`1 ,.aC,1/ ..vCit! :�. a:• 1 • ,- . •- rt0± 1.0001 r 1 1 :.001 1 :. O .. i�.. r. . . ��1•. . 0. 391 v . .''�-r:1 1 i.CI 1�!1 1 !.fv���%v 1 1.0001 .�i�1 i,'i }. :�U(:: _:. . 1 . 0; CI `.9. C.. 930 1 • . l01 1 .0:i01 1 .0•01 0.850: 1.y1001 1 5i:.I t i l�L 1 � r a l+ • 1 r+ : 1 .:::. : 1 1 . . 0. Z951 1 .010. 1.000: 1.000 1 1.0001 1 .000: 0.3501 .. .•1 E .� .. : . 1 . !0 i%. 7::5 1 1.0101 1 .0001 1.0001 1.0001 1 .0001 1.0001 3612 �I; _ y.• 9 c_ 0 1 1 1 8 5 1 1 0^ t : ,� . . . . . . .. . . . '.,,r: 1 .00i11 1.000: ..i;OG, 0.>sa�11 .,G..t/, ,. .. ,. f�1•r :1•• D.r^ r.4!E-1 }n - r: = F 1 it n & h R t 1 : • 1t. .'d;. ijiiiJ... iha.;y>-. .-1 '.f. 3'�i.rii..l:t,, i-�'� rER1�TTD� �#i#�i = 1 R T�Ti. rEnMTT� 1 . r : x : 1 : , 1 **is•A +.•- iF+.iF* r i ***•7i• i ,• r THE NEPO SR CUP," Bellevue, WA, using NCAF by F•£I . • `- ';-' :1ntersectior►:BENSONZ RD• S ATS,,PUGET: tR ' .:Date:8/18199 . Y',;' :. ...-1Analyst:EAB . ` , TimePeriod Anlyzdi M PEAK ' Area Type:' • CBD Xtlther : ' . • ;Project No.B9-366 City/State: 1990 BASELINE : r: SUPPLEMENTAL WORKSHEET FOR LEFT-TURN AD UST*ENT FACTOR, +LT : . I 1 INPUT VARIABLES;CGMPUT ATi01H E8 142 N2 B . ;Cycle Length, C (sec) ;Effective Greer., g {sec) ; • :No ber of' Lanes, N r . ist i Yppo.l i.it Flow Rate, 'iv . - . . :Mainline i,niine Flow. Rate-, Vm kept:) . r : ;Left-Turn Flow Bate. V1t i :Ni:) ;Proportion of LT, Pit , : :Opposing Le,fes, No. .. i : : Opposing Flow Rate, Vo 1 :1 , , • ;Prop. of L rt i rl .pp. Vol . F`i - : . ;Sop 1800i,ioJ il+PitotA40C+'V ' t' , • , : :'c - 1nlSc.F. ;Fs - :d 7 C-O. 625Vo j l iOO:; i : .PI = Pittl+M- 1 n J trsS .+4. 5) r i , r r „- t i , , ':El = 18OO1 :1400-V0) . :Fr. = 3f.g + Gu/g * tl ii+ et.:. 1 . : • :Fit = (Fm + N - 1)/N : : THE 'TRANSPG GROUP, Bei :e`..:e , Ali, using NCAP by. PSI' ' �,t. t se-t: tl: r 'RD S ATS :PUGET;.DR Datea8L '. : . • 1 • ,r per. e, �..•o? F:E Ss� 18�89. :A;aiyst:EAB:' TimePeriad Anlyzd:PM PEAK Area Type: CSD .Other ' :Project No. 89-iob City/State: 1990 BASELINE : : CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET : :LANE 8RCU`` : 4 • : 5 : b : 1 1' S : 9 : r-- : A•J_,i,te:i :Ad. Sat : Flow Ratio : Green :Ln.Srp; vli" ;Cr it. : 1 r -. : ri _ . Rate f1.;.Rt : : Ratio 1Capac. : Ratio . , 1't ;i' r,—. . . v • s 1 v/s : g / C 1 c 1 vph 1 S; ;Lane : e 1 3 1 i 11 ; ! r —. : i .. -- : 3575 • 0.328 : 0.337 . 1206 . 0. 972 i t.i:'* . 'r - 1 522 0. 187 1 0. 337 s 514 553 . . • .. - 5 1 _ : 0. 152 - - : 0.337 r 1185 : - - ` 5 0.337 1 _ e -Sd 1 _ . - 1500 0. 061 �- 1 Si.'J 1 • 1 V 1.� � - 0. 157 273 1 • , ,.. E -- 3546 1 j. , .. - : G. 1 VI : 432 : . ,~., : 41'':t - i -- , 5 % : 0.007 - i 0. 122 1 134 1 J.. 1:_ . - r . :.c . - 1 i : 5 1 0.477 - 1 0.49i i 343 C. T!•c : * * . 4 _ _ _ •4 -- • 3618 0.374 - 1 0.451 1 1631 : 0. 230 - i 1538 . 0.004 - : 0. 451 : 69" ` 0. 009 •Vf_. 0"C;- - , Lost ii /Cycld,L= 9.Osec, Sivls)ci 0,924, Xc=0.572 • : t-A W.: _ >. - _..r•,. Ai,.`v-1.T'x;r = PRC 1 CTD', +++ = PERM i TD, tt i** = PRDTC 1 D & PER 1 D s Y 1. . E : V i * # i 1 : e,a`.It r!:f 'i : !'*isf' : ; **** : 1 1 • • I • ' 1 I Y' THE T. At•:3PC GROUP, Bel 1 evue,' WA, using NCAP by PS: ' . . • • • 41;" • :&: Intersect on:TENSDN' Rfi: SATS • .. �; 1 ' ' AZS:''PL'UET 'DR � Date:8/18/89 •. : • • :Analyst:EAB TimePeriod Ar1yzd:PM PEAK Area Type: CBD XCtrer: ;Project No.89-366 City/State: 1990 BASELINE : 5 : LEVEL-OF-SERVICE WORKSHEET ' : : First Term Delay : Second Term Delay :' ° . c�.Del ay_.<_L{iS LANE 3 1 4 : 5 : 6 17 d : 5 : 1C+ : 11 : 12 1 13 GROUP: v/c : Green: Cycle; Delay I Lane; Delay :r`rQr •n :Lane Op: Ln Apprch ;Apr Ra tio:atio: Ratio:Length : dl :Sr1:up : d2 i•`d:.tof. ; Deli? t Sp ; Delay :LOS 1 : 2: X : Q/C : C : 'Bec/ve:1;CeG ;c ; :t•+:''vr. i ! ^r ; sec/ViiiLOJ seclve li Tbi --I__1 1 •-_._-__7_-_..-_._i 1 ! I I..._.__;__-.-__.__-1-__-�I--1 1 i 1 I I 1 1 •--_.__...._1_-- 1 1 ! 1 ; I I 1 I 1 I . 1 EB: CI 0.9721 10.337: 180.0; 44. ^_'•7.! 12:061 14. .'..M : LC. _`fl 46. 25s: E ! 0: r 55 t .. ? -:1 i - ; � I [Ia JJ -1 \+.•�� I .a •l11 �4: �%11 •.I.. _ . .�Ii 1'i,� � •..... ..v. i� I I 1 111:.71 L•. lr1V; C.•_, ,` 120. 4: .y• ..l . i. -_.-. . .. 1 ... . ::: .. . . _Z , D 1 29. 6 i D 1 21 0. .i E 0. 0.3 7 r 1 1.0.4: 3 1 . 6 5 t .. . • 2 1 . . 5 3 , r.. . ♦9 . u I i f1i 0. 77 .I i.•. ZGF. ) £C.V. : , :. . : ..7J.i ?'*, .. i%: 9. . . 5 r • I �`iE5 -- 0 72 2"^I . ;-• - = ,•,l, 5 5) �i .9.LS ll. •/.�1 A:iV. . t .:7�.v4i 'ram .- ,-� .:5. . . Iu:� i•.I. -... i I. . . i.�1 F 1 2: .060: 0. 12 21 1S0.01 3. . 14 I 1 i%. ::: 0. 85 4 . i , . 1. : A: 0-772: 0.491 i 1SC.0 . 73; Foy ; 15. 15' 1. Stu .-. .-S I S I I SBI ! -•e0! !0 "45 1Gr: 11 8, / !-1 ES 1 n 38 1 -•1 EI ��. b.1♦Ir . '+J1 : ..v4.L .�•[.a:. '�G; 1•.. . ... t•r`.: . G.. I .. .. .. . .i I .:.G• i! v • : @; 0.009: 0.451 : 1d0.0: 20. 7 2: 69: . C.:. :1;"): ...I. Ft.. : 1 7. 61 C: : ; : intersection Delay 4.5,.E+9 se:/vehs _"tie' oe:.t1L•n LDS E 1cti.:e 7. 1 ' :LANE GROUPD. G R FMS-f}*� = =;LTCT D. +Y-: - ?ER M T T. ' # R.`T C-:r & PEriT TD] : ! 1 -• I 1 I A " : C h � I D _ 1 Ff / 1. 1 : 1* : * i i i . I ****. I. ****> 1 **1#* i I **** 1 I 1 ; ! 1 4 1 1 1 I t I I 1 V : I : THE TRAFISPO GROUP,OLD bel l ei:ue; r-t :psi rg MCHN by PS : ^'�'%'':,•'r.�,;;hy ;, , - . : :'•„ 1 INPUT WOORKSH:E T ` •` ,. ii i 1' 1Intersect i cr.:BENSOON '.RD 'S: ATS '�UGET DR ' ' r, Date:8/18/8R "'' . ' '. ;Analyst:EAB TinePeriod Anlyzd:PM PEAK Area Type: CBI) XOther : :Project No.S9-3 6 City/State: 199) W1PROIECT : ' • , • : 12.0 . . 412. Y— E 5361 , I . . 1 12.0 : -WE Tr--AL: : () =- f, _T ; 43 i : NORTH v "---RT-12.0'-1 , __-T1i-_12.0'-1 . -- . LTH-12.0 -1 : : D NT FY IN D1AS . ;-. :.. . --- . .. • 12,Lar:%': ,lare wide!-.= ' LT . H RT : S PUSE1 DR • :3.Mov::.,mei:.s by 7. ane -• 12.0 ; 12.0: E/W STREET : :4..Par.fir; „-ratio:L - 17. 0 362 :5. .aJ St^'gE ;ryt-� i + r `-'.a 1 7 1 . 239 '.i iv ; :b. i=.i nilu5 r .- - • : i 6111 1}' • : r . .:;s stops v .. : i/B .TCT AL ' .!TRAFFIC AND ROADi•:AY -r_: •.-i 1 N_ -- ( , ;Ap .Grd. , X HV ; H - r-•ii t. C'•:. _ 4s PH i..rr$ . Pe Teds rr :1 V- t tor Arr. ;; ' :pr: MI : Yi N . : . pc1;hr-1 : YIN :lit ;-isle, Type; r . • :E$:+v. : 1 .0 : • N ? : : Y : 18 : . . :;vG:+3.0: 1.0. : . C .89 : Ci : tY : 18 . ' 3 : :115:+ . j: 1.v •. rj: . ; . . IV? 0 . 1 15 : 3 : • TSB:-2.Oi 1.0 : t- is . l:. •7 i 0 : Y : 15 : 3 : ' : '.:Grade:+ur,-down • `b: Guses stpppingihr Min. Timing: i in.green for : • :Hy:veh. > 4 L: .iS r`ii'F: :n - -..:;'r lnc tt;' pedestrian crossing : • • • :Nm:pkg.inane;.:verrs/:lr C-t.red_,. .:,;I :t.r'g paCis/hr Arr.Type: Type 1-5 � . ' :PHASING • , . : ---- - • : * : * * t • + D * ;• t * - • + , . , , , • ' . 1 : **i :\*** , <** , <*3 ** i ; : : : A r . r r : t . r : . t i I ,i .. t 4. , , • : A : (** . • ' . {+ : i ***,':*i , i . : 1i * * 1F ; . i • • .• , • • :Tl.?:- 3= 2?. 1 3= 5 . 2 3= :: T. 60. : i= 0 .O; G= - a . : 3- O. : lily :Y+ri= !YrR= y , ;+;•- _ . Y°.'�= : il•L= ii..i-R= 0;y+R= 4:Y+R= 0; :Ptr,:d/Act A _ , . : Protected turi.s: * **'' C.Z.C3" . 'ermittet tu-ns: 4i•44''"• : Cycle Length 180 SEC: . THE 7RANSPO I:S3_iF, i•t_ :evt.;e, WA, using NCAP by PSI : , ,,.. , y :nter--sec'ciori'sBENSON RD;S''ATS FUGET DR , •• . Date:8/18/89;. . { . 1 :Ar;alyst:LAB. Ti;nereriod Aniyzd;PM PEAK Area Type: CBD XOther : :Project No.89-306 City/State: 1990 W/PROJECT : '/ LUME ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET : 7, 4 r 6 : 7 : 8 : 7 I 10 : 11 : :4;;T.r• : :;v: . : Mvt. : Pzek ; Flow ; Lane 1Flw rt:Nursber: Lane : Adj. : Prop. : I-• ;Croup : in LA : o-r :Ltiiirz : Flow oll. 1 iLUl �r�T:$i Hour' i YAiC � ; . .p-,. :• ;r;z v4: :Grp Vg:Lanes :Fctr,U: V0v3h: , LT cr T: . ; ;vp : N T 9-4 . 7 :i 9 .`•i t . 7• - -_ - . ; ._- - -_. i I 1 I 1 ..-1 1 ';ii l h �C i I . I I 0. 04 I 1 LT . 4L• I I I L 1 •-. 1 • •• .. .. . O. E . : : i. : 1117: 2 : 1.05 ; 1:7 : + : 1. • . . 2 2,9 u: : 2i-9. 1 : 1.00 : 239! : .0O R . .. - ; 40; • 1 . . i,7 L, ; C I - l 1 • r 1 . ,. l : • E:- 7. r M : .1 1 I 1 1 + i• .0 0 t 1 7. • 1 . O.. :=T i 1 • - - - . ._5; .I i A • J '7 I a : 1 . 00 1 263; 1 , V , •... i . T.. .. - : , Y l L. , 0 7: L I 1.05 1 Z:.7 ; * .. I 11 .00: . 82.': P : Bit; 1 : 1.00 :`. 820: 1 . 00 LT 1 ti•t:; : E : 1 v4: 2 : 1.05 : 13,69: * . 6: D 1 I . . i :LANE •=RC_P ;;1=C;n:1:0,E **-- PROTCTD, - 4++ = PERMTTD, 44# = PROTCTD & PERMTTD.1 : E. I. I I ;. * : 1 i 1 . , * 1 1 r: 3ROL;P, Bellevue, NA, using NCAP by PSI . ;`":+, Intersection:BENSON RD' E ATS 'PUGET .DR. Date: 8/18/89 : :Anlaiyst:EAB ' . :. TirieFferiod An1yzd:F'M PEAK Area Type: CBD XOther: :Project No.89-366 Cityi8t&te: 1990 W/PR01:•ECT SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKEPEET LANE : 3 : 4 : 5 : 6 7 8 : 9 10 ! 11 ! 12 : 13 GR! UP t ,t t N .t '•t ! 1•_L ! d f P,; T :Rt - .. 1 T : r C7it�Uf ellletJ,l 1!i,'..• i�rl.W• �Y'�ifE11 �7r•'aJQ r .•i.1. iL•IAC�? i; .lif t'c�flt,� ry: !r:, r �.i ir}? e�djSdt : Sat. :of . . Fw Fh+V Fg Fp ^i it , - Fit. :clwt 1 7: Flow :Lns: ! •• -_- _-- : S 1 1 1 - t 7 1 f 1 t EP: c• 1800 i 2 : 1.00C: • . jf95! 1 . C i , f'� i • • Lir.�,4 is� O. 9':u: 3575 ' ff�L•} 1 d L�Y 1 I ! .0\7 C 1 \ • 9 q� 1 • . 3:1. ,J r 2 r 1 I 1 I ! I • • . l': 1000 i i i : . .95 'is.l. l . . .•i .. , • :i ii.i: 1531-, • Ali 1 0C : 1 1 LOCO: ▪ . ,. .:0l . • 95 S Oa.N B G. ?BOO 1 2 1 ..5.+lj . . . 1 . . i•. . , %!i. - . . . . . .1i�. 1 . .•i li C+: 35:.6 : 7 10,)0 : .. : 1.0 r:ti, 0. 9 9 C%, 7'? .� - J� .•r% i :'.�., I ,.. . . . N. :v.l. 1 : 1 . 0rC>I V. '�`.`.i• .J, i . . `?l� . } . . ... ' •a ... ..'"'':: 1/ 8 -'I E: ;BOOt c :::}• 1 i t, r 2 1 1• i%. U. ~ ..•! i , r`i CJ i , ,.is r .'.1 t,i ▪ �. : . r i%t.•i •0`.'+!i 3613 : tre: 1800 : 1 i 1 i 0 . 0. 9 9 : 1 . i 1 ti _ .1'7: Y .0 0: . •., .i .. :^ t 1 . 00O1 t,-AAc GROUP ilRGk* MS-[.*i� - Pnu�..i;i, - ?E;••T T; , = 1 R'T :' . hER;T T L) 1 • : C : E : : **** : *+ **) : **** : • *t* : 1 • t. 1 , :• • i r • THE TRiYSP O GROUP, Le: a eVtiEs WA, using NEAP by PSI 1 t • • •r • -Intersecticn:SE':SGriS) S ATS •HJGET •DR: . - • Date:9/18/89' , ' ' " ' ;Analyst:EA^ TirnePeriod Anlyzd:PM •PEAK • Area Type: CBD )(Other : :Project No.89-36 City/State: 1990 W/PROJECT : i -. • 1 : S::PPLE1.EtJTAL iJORKSHEET FOR LEFT-TURN ADJUSTMENT FACTOR, fLT : t Itir _4H, LE.. C i A',i:i S 1 ES____'----wS--- ___NB----'----58--- I •E-1"Fective ;]i een - _ i.iEeci . i i i i } 1 1 i :Number `t4 ...ri%i t'- 1 1 , I i • .8• ;'- .:i^'.•.-, . _ _ r -, . i ;t cTt-TUPI'i F1'"i:.i Rats , 'v'It ,;V(^h1 1 .,FIB LT , it , 1 :Cppo=ineiLa..--,-,.-, , . - , i I 1 t 1 f . _ l•? . : • i 1 . 1 t • l 1 1 , Fii: = G; T .•%I_ . .{ . ..-i-F i etc. 1 • 1 I '- ._ - 1 1 , 1 y•.- r,:ANEPO t:• t 1 T• : nlV�• v t:R.`f'jP1E1teV iE� �:As U51Ily NL'i�� �.�/, �`Ci • • • .0: • i' ,' Ir,tersectian:£ENSON RD S ATS F'UGET DR ' irate:$/18/84 ; :Analyst.EA:3 • TimePeriad Anlyzd:PN PEAT; Area Type: CEIi XCther ; ;Project No. G9-36 . • City/State: 1990 WIPRCJECT , CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET • . 1 ;l Ar CROUP 1 3 4 , v , 1 8 r -•; Adjusted :tAd.Sat : Flaw Ratio : Green :_...Gr{i : viC :Crit . . 1 f-1i o i S 2 , C,Mi a^lS�. it-i'li.,1'1'� i - r Ratio ivaFi a�.. ; F:dam,. • :i=pp , Mvmt. , s vie : g C ;c,°.-P . , f. Lene , I , ';E , 1173 - 57 ; 00.32E - 0. 337 , 1206 0, •2 “,-k r + . 239 ..• • 1522 1 0. 190 - • _•. I r . .J:.. . , 1 . • 5. . - . -5'-- ; 0. 153 - , 116 . - : . : 91 - 1500 0.061 - 0. 3 7. ; 50; . . .. _ . . - . A 1.- - , 1624 : 0. 160 - 1 0. 162 ; 273 . . •'i8 -- , c. 1 ; C' J"; f =* ., ; . ; - 15 . 7 : 0. '07 - . . . 1 .E4 . - - - . .. . i Y ,i 221.. - i 1716 • 0. 477 0. 491- 1 .i 843 i 0.972 , �{F • E 1 1369, •- 361S : 0.37E - : L•.4 1 i 31 ; ,,640 , - t«38 : . . 451 1 69.: i i,(, 00S i r i C , G - i S J i� �i,�,`��� - - 1 ;Cycle Length= 160,0ser , Lost TimeiCycle,L= 99.0sec, S (v/sici= 0. 926, X::=0. 977; LANE E GROUP 2'1AGRAME-i -** = 1 R0TCTD. +++ = FERMT : tit tli = PROTCTD & PERM T ; A • ; C ' ,.. 1 E : C * ; + 1 1 : . ***+ 1 :i** . ****i 1 ** ;i• ; : * : , 1 1 V i THE T ANS , r, 'Fkw�r'C GROUP, Bellevue, WA, using NCAP by PSI : • i • • : Ir.•tersection:BENSC+N RD S ATS PDGET DR Date:Bi18/09 , :Analyst:EAA TimePer;od Anlyzd:PM PEAK Area Type: CAD XDther: :Project No.B9-366 City/State: 1990 to/PROJECT, ' -. • 1 LEVEL-OF-SERVICE r ORR SHEET : ____,______Fi'rst Term Delay : Sewn; Term 1Delay :Tot.Delay_& LD5 LANE I .) : 4 : J : .. 7: ! i u : 9110 , 11 : 12 : 13 GROUP: v/c : Green : Cycle! Delay : _ar,e: Delay :Prgrsn:Larle Up! Ln : Apprch:Apr ----- : Ratia: fiat.el_er,gth : :;1 :=ro,., :: d2 :Factor: Delay . Gal Delay :LOS 1 1 2+ X I g/C I C sec/iJt ..n•p '- , ez. v h : PF Isec, veh :LO3'sec/veh :Tb1 i i.pl ., : • 1-•13 i -:i l --1 :9-— -- - : - -- -t---- - • -- 1 I 1 -.-.1 1—. : : I I 1 I I , EB: C: 0�. .3I..2: . a,_. . .Sc;.(f: 44. c : ._s . . 1 ?: . .25 : 5_0.53, E : 46. 84; E . 1%. `1..i + . . .J w . :.4:J. : ♦ . ': _ .'1 . . • •t 1 0. 35 1 :2. 4 1 I ,I. . , I WB I V. �{4 :I 0 . ... : 16 . : _.S. `V - a - . . :0 i . . 85 : 3.J. 3OI .. : 2 . 25! D • 2 t 0. 1 `2. 0. .. .. .E•C. (I . .. . . I - ... : . L n.S J 1 2. . 1.7 : D I , I,�r� I Al . . ... . . i 6.. �i;. ., _ 33. 451. . _ . . . �+) 7�I. iJ ti . T. I 1 \, E G, C.ECF. •.i. 1:2! 16.).C., '. • ; . _ . . 4:3 1 Cf. J... 1 76. S6. ! 83..:2: F . C: 0.v60; 0 ;2: 1B:a. 0 r ... I 1s"1 . :/. 0.. ;' 1 L J 45. 1 1 E f t J J ' ! 1 7 •' ; I t ; e ^ 1 SB: i_ . 0,e40. . . 7,t:1 : .3(. ;, .5. 2 . . ... _ • 7... ?1 . . =•J . 3‘). 69 D : 32. 65t r ' 0hr•: S 1 1eo 20 72 - r: '•^ f1 55 t7 C ; t1 : �. :v . l:.�a ,vt:. - J:v• _ _ . .v!i: - J 1. r•11 :Intersection Delay :..2' -:e::f•�e`' 1 Intersection LDS E Table 9. 1 : 1 :LANE GRC I0 D,AG iCJ-:M: -r•1•*# - vh:,TE.i ;, . --i. = PEP T T D, 114# = PNi.1TCT;.i k• PERMTTD1 : 1 1 . t , , , I : ;' 1 . : • : J ' , + 1 i THE 1 BALD+ u uKULr ; Bellevue, %A, Using NCAP by .r LOCATION:CITY LIGHTS ARTMENT :NAME:DRIVEWA HOURLY VOLUMES : VOLUMES IN PCPH N) Major street:OLD BENSON ROAD ==== _--_ N= 2 <---V5--- 1351 ; <---VS--- Grade 454---V2---> v---V4--- 24 V2---> v---V4--- 24 0% 8---V3---v N= 2 : ---V3---v < : :> ; <I I> Date of Counts: I I I : : I : I I AUGUST 1989 : V7 V9 I X STOP : V7 V9 : Time Period: : : I I YIELD : II I PM PEAK : 4 111 : I 4 II : Approach Speed: Minor Street: Grade 35 DRIVEWAY 07. PHF: .9 N= 2 Population: 500000 _ VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS Movement no. I 2 : 3 1 4 I 5 I 7 : 9 : Volume (vph) : 454 : 8 : 24 I 1351 ; 4 11 : Vol (pcph) ,see Table 10. 1 :XXXXXXXXIXXXXXXXX : 24 :XXXXXXXX: 4 : 11 I STEP 1 : RT From Minor Street : I-> V9 Conflicting Flows, Vc 11/2 V3+V2= 4 + 227 = 231 vph(Vc9) Critical Gap, Tc I Tc= 5.2 secs (Tab.10.2) Potential Capacity, Cp : Cp9= 913 pcph (Fig: 10.3) Actual Capacity, Cm : Cm9=Cp9= 913 pcph STEP 2 : LT From Major Street I v-- V4 Conflicting Flows, Vc I V3+V2= 8 + 454 = 462 vph(Vc4) Critical Gap, Tc Tc= 5. 1 secs (Tab.10.2) Potential Capacity, Cp I Cp4= 726 pcph (Fig.10.3) % of Cp utilized and Impedance Factor ; (V4/Cp4)x100= 3.3Z P4= .98 Actual Capacity, Cm (Fig.10.5) I Cm4=Cp4= 726 pcph STEP 3 : LT From Minor Street I <-X V7 = = =_ Conflicting Flows, Vc : 1/2 V3+V2+V5+V4= 4 + 454 + 1351 + 24 = 1700 vph(Vc7) Critical Gap, Tc : Tc= 6.8 secs (Tab. 10.2) Potential Capacity, Cp I Cp7= 73 pcph. (Fig.10.3) Actual Capacity, Cm : Cm7=Cp7xP4= 73 x .98 = 72 pcph __ SHARED LANE CAPACITY SH = (V7+V9)/ ( (V7/Cm7)+(V9/Cm9) ) if lane is shared CR CR LOS LOS MOVEMENT V(PCPH) CM(PCPH) CSH(PCPH) (CM-V) (CSH-V) CM CSH _ 7 4 72 68 E 9 11 913 902 A 4 24 726 702 A AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION 513 Lynn Rainey ,being first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the VALLEY DAILY NEWS • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition Public Notice Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week. That said newspapers are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT Count Washin ton. The ValleyDailyNews has been approved as a legal HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUN- y, g pp g CIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for FLOOR OR CITY HALL, RENTON, WASH- King County. INGTON. ON TUESDAY, JANUARY 16, 1990, AT 9:00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Kent Edition CITY LIGHTS , Renton Edition XX , Auburn Edition , (and not in AAD-134-99 (ECF;SA-087-89) supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers peA hearing has been scheduled to PP P, Y appeal an administration determination by during the below stated period. The annexed notice a P uL 1 i c Not.ic , the Environmental Review Committee on the Environmental Review Committee on the proposed City Lights, 61 unit residential ( (P uu 1 i c. hearing) R 3 0 y complex, on a vacant 3.3 acre site, located on the east side of Benson Road between was published on Jan • ' . 1 Purie and South 26th Street. PpropertD is vzoned R-3, medium density mule- ti-family development. Legal descriptions of the files noted The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the above are on file in the Renton Community •E Development Department. sum of$ ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRE- SENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON yinpr TUESDAY, JANUARY 16, 1990, AT 9:00 A . Ifl( A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. Published in the Valley Daily News Janu- ary 5, 1990 R3909. Subscribed and sworn before me this t delay of `� ' • 19 9 L Nota Public for the State of Washington residing at Auburn, King County, Washington VDN#87 Revised 4/89 FR ................................................. :::::>:.::::::<:::<.>:.>:::::::> >::>:>: ::::::::::>:::::>�:::. ENT .N.......................... : :;: :;»:;::::::;:»;:<::::;:::>;>::>::;::: LI . ....... . ..................................... ........ o app�eatiori(s)hsled are in Order Of�pplicatia�nurnb�r:;ox�1y�n�T n4t :: necessarily the Order ire which they will be heard Items will be called for heanng PROJECT NAME: CITY LIGHTS APARTMENTS PROJECT NUMBERS: AAD-134-89 (ECF;SA-087-89) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Appeal of an administrative determination by the Environmental Review Committee on the proposed City Lights, 61 unit residential complex, on a vacant 3.3 acre site, located between Puget Drive and South 26th Street. The property is zoned R-3, medium density multi-family • development. • 1 ' NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON • A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON TUESDAY, JANUARY 16, 1990, AT 9:00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: CITY LIGHTS AAD-134-89 (ECF;SA-087-89) A hearing has been scheduled to appeal an administration determination by the Environmental Review Committee on the proposed City Lights, 61 unit residential complex, on a vacant 3 .3 acre site, located on the east side of Benson Road between Puget Drive and South 26th Street. The property is zoned R-3, medium density multi-family development. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Community Development Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON TUESDAY, JANUARY 16, 1990, AT 9:00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. Published in the Valley Daily News January . 5, 1990. Account #51067 OF RA: O • .7_,I,N, U �% © Z 0 9,o b' ,-, TICE . E 0,94rep SEP1 of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner . will hold a 1 puBLIC HEARING in . CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL January 16, 1990 9:00 ON BEGINNING AT A.M. P.M. CONCERNING: CITY LIGHTS APPEAL AAD-134-89 (REFERENCE NOS ECF; SA-087-89) Appeal of an administration determination by the Environmental Committee on the'+proposed City Lights, 61 unit complex, on a' vacant 3.3 acre site. Zoned R-3.• .1yy11,,,,,.N C 0oI / jr - : 1 - I I - /tr ti 11I (3----'3 111I '111 i 7 , , Ci f I ------•i-.'_.- ,.i Ji/// /, '„ � 11 �� , PROJECT SITE / '�y.o•Tnn,�+cw'c" is. 7 '1�'1�`� 'n / T,CT NraTA.K,. 1 .,...:,___________ 0,0,s, -..:-_,...„;.• :,, ,•—•___ .:. ,-:-:-,:-.Q ..-,,,.. \ --t-7L-4_-.7 Q',::��:'fl- I �1�" �-V= /ham '�- • 1 -- . T• .rut-roar.uoo— • GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS: Property located on the east side of Benson Road between Puget Drive and South 26th Street. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON , BUILDING&ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 • THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT PROPER -AUTHORIZATION CERTIFICATIONS I I , • MAr(� c)rav(;Irx. , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT 3 COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON OR NEARBY THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY, ON J •- � ._ ��� I ti • .ATTEST: Subscribed and.sworn to before me, e Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington • residing in Q.01-04.) , on the /) day of` j Ici D y . ,SIGNED : ,9i 1 1 • '} OF RNI cilTicE ED , • O V • 0 el Z 091)- D SEP-C City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner will hold a HEARING . PUBLIC in CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL January 16, 1990 9 : 00 ON BEGINNING AT _ A.M. ' P.M. • CONCERNING: . CITY LIGHTS APPEAL AAD-134-89 (REFERENCE NOS ECF; SA-087-89) Appeal of an administration determination by the Environmental Committee on the proposed' City Lights, 61 unit complex, on a vacant 3 . 3 acre site. Zoned R-3 . • yLlwo au" 1 __-' 11 cLcr acNo^o j /' /1: 1\‘'ski', ,'ii SCHOOL II 1 • 11 I 1I 1 _ 1 i I i �\ j 1 1----y �_-� J 1 P1.nKJ1-Y 1�I II • i 1 7 jel----I r---� --------------- I •r-L G / I '/ Y 1 � N -- o PROJECT SITE / 'I•lecaarr.11u"cN"" W I > I - '..0 t‘, i 19 Fc 1 : / //7/7 /./ //// s's;:‘ ,;____'. I11 W1 r riICT ✓ ass . , " ^f- -,1`--tea� �_7Pbl IIQ ,,,,,,ss..Q.1)Q, :.61,)1.Q.,,..,s 1, cEw_ .1....,. .1......_ • 1 �/ 1. SMWL.wwas r ntsoQnAL ,V'� yam I , GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS: Property located on the east side of Benson Road between Puget Drive and South 26th Street. • FOR FURTHER .INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235.-2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED . WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION • , , WRITTEN APPEAL OF HEARING EXAMINER' S DECISION/RECOMMENDATION TO RENTON CITY COUNCIL. CITY OF RENTON APPLICATION NAME: FILE NO. UIcciDP 14 iLLs•4 2_�S[i)t'•N•(S RECEIVED CITY CLERK'S OFFICE The undersigned interested party hereby files its Notice of Appeal from the Decision or Recommendation of the Land Use Hearing Examiner, dated i:,)—(S- 19 Si. 1 . IDENTIFICATION OF PARTY APPELLANT: REPRESENTATIVE (IF ANY) : Name: (1.c- �. � ( (LA(- Name: i)Le-11112( 1-2.•51 AC.::-PTf Address: I( S . .27 rtL �L. Address: j1:)) S 7 • iL . Z r N cc,'i-\ z E ytj Tv Al 6,,f}. eid �.5.... Telephone No. J?,5 1f(t(7 Telephone No., )-;3,5- c/lc/•I 2. SPECIFICATION OF ERRORS (Attach additional sheets if necessary) Set forth below are the specific errors or law or fact upon which this appeal is based: _D C .At Ac- i') FINDINGS OF FACT: (Please designate number as denoted . in the Examiner's Report) - No. Error: • Correction: CONCLUSIONS: No. Error: Correction: OTHER: - No. ' Error: Correction: 3. SUMMARY OF ACTION REQUESTED: The City Council is requested to grant the following relief: (Attach explanation, if desired) Reverse the Decision or Recommendation and grant the following relief: /2.676)v;i0 ... 6s73 ,9 Poi) y-j 7' F;ya s,7-e_ Modify the Decision or Recommendation as follows: Remand to the Examiner for further consideration as follows: Other: ti fit:46 Appellan epr sentative Signature Date NOTE: Please refer to Title IV, Chapter 30 of the Renton Municipal Code, and Sections 4-3016 and 4-3017, specifically (see reverse side of page) for specific appeal procedures. • CITY OF RENTON LtU 1 5 1989- Mr. Fred Kaufman RECEIVED Hearing Examiner CITY CLERK'S OFFICE Renton, Wa. 98055 Dear Mr.Kaufman: December14, 1989 RE: ECF; SA-087-89 City Light Apartments on Benson Road near S.26th ST. The Renton Environmental Review Committee has declared that City Light Apartments does not require an environmental impact statement. Frankly, we see little difference between this site and the proposed Forrest Creste Apartments where the committee also tried to waive an EIS. We will present why this site should require an EIS and why it should comply with PUD requirements 4-2709 Renton has designated this area as severely environmentally sensitive due to 25-40% slopes. Likewise, Don Erickson(Renton Zoning Administrator) in his letter to us, November 29, 1989, admits that the area will require special consideration for development and that the units had to be reduced because of the slopes, soil conditions, and run off water. But, he also said, "no city study identifies the suitability for development on this site." The latter statement alone should alert the need for an EIS for the site and a PUD per 4-2709 that will study the specific problems of this site. The apartment complex (Victoria Hills) that lies opposite this site required a EIS and PUD. Therefore, an EIS, and PUD needs to be required for this project so we can know the specific consequences of development and how they will be resolved. The Victoria Hills Apartments experienced severe flooding and mud slides during its' construction. Much of the water is run off from the proposed City Lights apartments location. Yet , no study has been done to measure in gallons/ hour the flow across City Lights area. The City Lights project contains even more hazards, as its steep slopes lie above the Benson Road with over 8,000 vehicle trips per day. Any blockage of, or changes to Benson would channel this traffic through our residential neighborhood. City Lights is bordered to the North by a Seattle Water Main 5 feet in diameter, and a Natural gas main pipeline. On the East lies Nelson Middle School. Any one of these elements should require an EIS report so we know the consequences of disturbing this steep hillside. Also, No SEPA study has been done regarding the removal and replacement of trees which the city recently adopted to protect such unstable areas. Due to its steep slopes and mud slide threats it presents to Benson Road, this site should be developed under PUD 4-2709 not the general 4-709 that allows higher densities that will require more tree and earth moving. Under 4-2709 only 17 units per acre are allowed and with the steep slopes less than 46 units would be allowed for this site as opposed to the proposed 61 units. Also, 4-475 dealing with greenbelts and steep slopes impose even further restrictions. In fact, 4-2709 might impose such severe restrictions on this site that no development would be allowed to take place on this site. City Light only studied the number of vehicles they will contribute to Benson. No study has been done showing how this traffic will impact existing traffic conditions. For example, Benson Road has more than 8,000 vehicle trips per day and often during peak traffic backs from Puget Drive to 31st S., so people leaving or entering the apartments y l+ would have great difficulty. Also, Victoria Hills Apartments has yet to widen Benson Road so you have all this traffic trying to enter a narrow two lane road. Also, the only entrance and exit to the 176 unit Victoria Hills apartments lies only 150 feet from the entrance to City Lights. No study has been done in this geographic area showing the tremendous number of multifamily homes that already exist and being built using this same roadway. Renton already restricts sewer connections due to current loads on the sewer system but there is no mention of this in any study for City Lights. This City Light Apartment area and surrounding geographic area has under gone several multifamily developments so our schools will be severely impacted by all these children not just the 15 mentioned in Don Ericksons' letter. We trust you understand how this project, however small, when added to the existing and developing housing, traffic, and unstable slopes above Benson Road needs to require an EIS and if any development is possible that it would be done under PUD 4-2709 that examines and takes the specific consequences of developing this hillside into consideration. Therefore, we request that an EIS and PUD be required for the site. Sincerely,, George Post Victoria Hills Residents 1122 S.27th P1. Renton, Wa. 98055 235-4147 4i 0 CITY OF RENTON POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor MEMORANDUM Dew /g, Ze heal_Alniai2 From/ ikcf �//0PJo u.1oJ /: V5/e7 n�er for te CatZij dflarn , /fov / 8`� tGf �� �e �r , 9 7 -rs ol& to A6` � �u�1 Z� torril Gan ern'f 7helir-- j t d7 /o P61/ e a) kw( Q 12 s ae,-/- o--F /D or more pail/view- v6Aldes etY a Sffe__ i hb later3Ee on., /Jee-I. cal) ce.“4 ekA feel er yr id ,.� ,� 11?e n a±��2Cc� >r��^- et and L.5-7LciiitoL dele4a Gl 6 's �{O r�� fo ®�fY14r .fie t 3e d W `� 6- s afr)a 12 for 7J,Is ei,vl oio �,c will 6crid rin is to1lUB7'tsa//on A/) a_ /eZr fo /lie 111 �Ie 4v1� ,set !/2o keel fe f2Dl� 2� 471-9. �/ 4r7nJ eel) for chase/\ /v'S d 6T r g_v/e�, • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2552 • CITY OF RENTON NAL !r, 0)4, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Planning Division November 29, 1989 George Post 1122 South 27th Place Renton, Washington 98055 RE: City Lights, Benson Road, (SA 087-89) Dear Mr. Post: This letter is written in response to your correspondence of November 17, 1989 , originally sent to Fred Kaufman, Hearing Examiner, and redirected to the Planning Division, detailing your concerns about the above-referenced project. To begin, I would like to assure you that environmental review has been undertaken for this proposed residential development. An analysis was conducted by the City's Environmental Review Committee of all application materials required under the State Environmental Policy Act and our local Environmental Review Ordinance (4-2822) , together with supplemental information mandated as a result of specific characteristics of the site (e.g. a soils study based upon topography, a traffic analysis based upon anticipated impacts from this development upon local roadways, a survey of current utilities service lines) . On November 1, 1989 , following extensive evaluation of the project, the Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of Non- Significance - Mitigated, with a number of conditions required to mitigate aesthetic impacts, light and glare impacts, noise impacts, traffic impacts, soils impacts, storm water management impacts and other areas of concern. Additional mitigation measures will be required in conjunction with site plan review to ensure that the project is a positive addition to our community. With respect to your concerns about slope stability, I would advise you that studies done by the City for the purpose of identifying slopes, sensitivity and other special characteristics do identify the site as one which will require special consideration for development. However, that study does not identify the suitability of specific sites for development. Additionally, the City, in establishing mitigation measures for site design, storm drainage management and slope protection for this project did recognize the special characteristics of the terrain and topography, as well as the presence of run-off on this site. Plans under consideration are anticipated to limit free run-off to Benson Road, thereby reducing the amount of water and eroded soil which commonly travel to and along that roadway. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 Facsimile (206) 235-2513 , *George Post November 29, 1989 Page 2 Specific design of a storm water management system will be subject to approval by the Public Works Department. With respect to permitted density levels, Zoning Ordinance Section 4-709 (A) (R-3 , Medium Density Multi-family Development) permits a maximum of 25 units per acre. Based upon that standard, if the property were not sloped, approximately 80 units would be permitted. However, based upon the slope a density reduction is required under the Greenbelt Ordinance (Section 4- 745) . With that reduction, the applicant would be allowed a maximum of approximately 70 units on the site, but the Environmental Review Committee required a further reduction to the proposed 61 units to accommodate site characteristics and potential impacts (e.g. aesthetics, traffic, . school system) . With respect to density limits set by Zoning Ordinance Section 4- 2709, I would like to clarify that those requirements refer only to Planned Un:i:tbevelopments and are, therefore, not applicable for City Lights;: . With respect to traffic. impacts, I would like to clarify that SEPA regulations .(WAC. ,197-11-660) and local regulations/policies restrict the'c,Q}Sligation of a developer to that of providing information abo'u`t/mitigating for impacts related to the project under consideration. Laws and a variety of judicial decisions specifically 'pohibit a municipality from requiring a project proponent to resolve issues not directly related to that project -- such as vehicles currently travelling on the Benson Road corridor. However, I would note for you that, based upon results of the traffic analysis provided by the proponent, and other information/improvement plans on file with the City, the Environmental Review Committee is requiring the proponent to participate to his fair share in improvements to Benson Road and to the signalization of the S.W. 31 Street/Benson Road intersection. Specific responsibilities for funding and construction of other Benson Road improvements have been established by the Transportation Services Division and may be obtained from the Department of Public Works. With respect to your concerns about an application for a Routine Vegetation Management Permit, I would assure you that the applicant has provided a tree inventory and tree plan which have been approved in concept by the City (Environmental Review Committee and Landscape Architect) . The Environmental Review Committee has prohibited any tree cutting until all components of the proposed project have been fully approved by the City; when the specific plans have been approved, the applicant will be required to obtain a permit. *George Post November 29, 1989 Page 3 With respect to your concern about utilities services, the City has determined that adequate resources are available to accommodate the proposed residential development. The City is aware of the presence of a gas main to the north of the site. This service line is located in an easement which precludes any development which impedes access to the line. The easement is not on the subject property, and all structures will be set back at least twenty feet from the southern boundary of the easement. Utility lines on the site will similarly be protected from encroachment at their current locations or will be relocated on the site, with the permission of the Public Works Department so they are protected and permitted to function effectively. Specific civil drawings for utility connections are not required for environmental/site plan review, but will be required in conjunction with building permits. With respect to your concern about "school district issues" , it is estimated that City Lights, which is planned to include primarily one and two bedroom units, will house approximately 15 school-aged children. School district representatives have informed us that those children can be accommodated. Finally, the City is cognizant of the need to address cumulative impacts of development; environmental studies conducted at the time that the R-3 designation was placed on this property established the suitability of the site for such development. Additionally, the City, is endeavoring to provide off-site improvements to address impacts from vicinity developments to mitigate those impacts. At the present time there is no moratorium on development along Benson Road. As a result, development is permitted with the proviso that adequate measures are in place to address environmental impacts and site plan review criteria. Those measures are designed to ensure the development of an attractive, functional residential complex. I hope this information has been of assistance to you. If you have other questions, please contact me or Lenora Blauman, project manager, at 235-2550. Thank you for your interest in the City of Renton. rely, / Y IWOi Don K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator PLY.',<<'°IN'^ DIVISION r• ENTON I� November 17, 1989 In NOV 1 7 1989 I [111 , 3 Fred Kaufman �� (9 1i-1 11 . I 200 Mill Avenue Renton, WA 98055 RE: ECF StOggi7grg CITY LIGHT APARTMENTS, Benson Road & So. 26th Dear Mr. Kaufman: First of all, we were shocked to see that the posted signs read no environmental impact was done for the site. We see little difference between this site and the proposed Forest Crest Apartments which had significant problems with storm water drainage, school district issues, sewer restrictions, traffic, and cumulative effects from the apartments surrounding the site. Granted, this site is smaller; but it will have severe repercussions for the area. We are opposed to the apartments for the following reasons: One, Renton, in their Environmentally Sensitive Report (1986), has designated this area as a severely environmentally unstable area with 25-40% slopes. The road is located directly above a major arterial, Benson Road, which handles in excess of 8,000 vehicle trips per day. It is bordered to the north by a Seattle water main which is 5 feet - in diameter as well as a natural gas main. The east border adjoins Nelson Middle School at a sheer hillside that is teeming with subterranean springs and run-off. The water that flows off this hillside has caused severe flooding and mudslides at the Victoria Hills apartments. The City Light study does not indicate or measure the tremendous volumes of water that flow across this site. Two, Renton City Code 1986 was amended to read R-3 zoning (4-2709) that only 17 units per acre are allowed. Much of the 3.3 total acres cannot be used due to steep and unstable slopes, which would reduce the number of permitted units. Also, even if all 3.3 acres could be used, only 56 units could be built -- not the proposed 70 units. Three, the City Light Apartment traffic study only reports how many cars will leave the City Light location. The study does not mention the already more than 8,000 vehicle trips per day on Benson Road that can often back up from Puget Drive to 31st So. at peak traffic. Nor does the study mention that only 150 feet from their driveway is the only entrance and exit to the 176-unit Victoria Hills apartments. The City Light report does not mention that the Victoria Hills apartments have failed to widen Benson Road as per the PUD and that the projected cost has now risen to *1.3 million from the original $885,000 and that it is in dispute with the city about paying to widen the road. The apartments would channel cars and increased traffic through the neighboring Victoria Hills residential neighborhood. Additional apartments would lead to further accidents and gridlock for Benson Road. Four, the City Light apartments had no application for a Routine Vegetation Management Permit required by Renton's Land Clearing and Tree Cutting Code and SEPA. It is apparent that there are a number of city and state violations for this site that would preclude its development. Also, there are a number of missing reports: Environmental, drainage, unstable or excessively steep slopes, SEPA studies, Benson traffic studies, sewer connections, and the fact that the Victoria Hills apartments never widened Benson Road and is in dispute with the city on their cost of the $1.3 million minimum for widening of Benson. Please inform us of your findings. Sincerely, Georg Post Victoria Hills resident 1122 South 27th Place Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 235-4147 oil - � MEMORANDUM DATE: November 21, 1989 TO: Lenora Blauman, Assistant Planner FROM: Richard H. Nordon / 96 OILAss't Transportation Planning Engr. SUBJECT: Citizens Complaint Concerning City Lights I have reviewed the letter by Mr. George Post concerning the City Lights Apartment complex and I would like to provide the following responses: 1. Mr. Post mentioned traffic on Benson Road backing up from Puget Dr. to SE 31st St in the AM Peak hour. The City Lights development is providing as much relief to the traffic congestion problems on Benson Road as they are legally required. The City is seeking assistance from the WSDOT to alleviate the problems to the North of Puget Dr. that are the cause of this congestion. The long term solution to this congestion is two fold: A. Reconstruct Main Street to a five lane section. B. Reconstruct Benson Road from Main to Puget Dr. to a 3 or 4 lane section. Traffic back ups on Benson Road result from congestion in downtown Renton and not as a result of this development or Victoria Hills FPUD. 2 . The next two comments from Mr. Post concerning Victoria Hills FPUD can be addressed by the following Benson Road project update. First City Development Corp. , North Bay Development Corp. , and the City of Renton will improve Benson Road as a City project in 1990. The following break down is a listing of the project responsibilities for funding and construction: A. First City Development Corp (Victoria Hills FPUD) : 1. Construct 2 additional lanes from Puget Dr. south to the City of Seattle pipeline ROW. 2 . Construct 1 additional lane from 'there to just north of the 1st Presbyterian Church property. 3 . Construct 2 additional lanes from there to just south of SE 26th Street. r ' Lenora Blauman 11/21/89 Page 2 B. North Bay Development Corp (City Light Apartments) : Construct 1 additional lane along the front of their property. This extends from the City of Seattle pipeline ROW to the Church property. C. City of Renton: 1. On the east side of Benson Road construct 1 lane from the south end of the City Lights Apartment complex to the beginning of the Victoria Hills improvements. 2. Plane smooth the center 24' of Benson Road from Puget Dr. to just south of SE 26th Street and overlay it with new asphalt. 3 . Mr. Post's comments concerning traffic from the apartments causing additional accidents and gridlock are not entirely correct. The total number of accidents may increase but only at the same rate that they are now occurring. As I've mentioned in item 2 , the gridlock on Benson Road is a result of problems occurring far away from this development and are not the total responsibility of this development to solve. There is a small chance that the improvements on Benson Road will not be performed under a coordinated City project in 1990. But, the improvements under items A and B will absolutely be performed by the developers if this joint Developer and City project does not coalesce. If this joint project does not move forward quickly enough First City Development Corp. will have to perform their improvements starting the 1st or 2nd quarter of 1990. North Bay Development is still in the preliminary stage and will not have to improve Benson Road until their project is approved and nears final completion. • CC: Lynn Guttman, Dir. of Public Work Gary Norris, Trans. System Manager Benson City Project File r 'Li��' NINC DIVISION s (..,TiO; HENTON ff November 17, 1989 Li,' NOV 1989 I ' (j [' ri .\ f •1!Fred Kaufman �-� ,.) r, I 200 Mill Avenue ' Renton, WA 98055 • RE: ECF SA-087-89 CITY. LIGHT APARTMENTS, Benson Road & So. 26th . i Dear Mr. Kaufman: _ • 1 First of all, we were shocked to see that the posted signs read no • environmental impact was done for the site. We see little difference I, between this site and the proposed Forest Crest Apartments which had significant problems with storm water drainage, school district issues, sewer restrictions, traffic, and cumulative effects from the apartments surrounding the site. Granted, this site is smaller; but it:+.viill' have `' 11 severe repercussions for the area. We are opposed to the apartments fot the following reasons: ' One, Renton, in their Environmentally Sensitive Report (1986), has designated this area as a severely environmentally unstable area with 25-40% slopes. The road is located directly above a major arterial, . Benson Road, which handles in excess of 8,000 vehicle trips per day. It is bordered to the north . by a Seattle water main which is 5 feet • in diameter as well as a natural gas main. The east border adjoins Nelson Middle School at a sheer hillside that is teeming with subterranean springs and run-off. The water that flows off this • hillside has caused severe flooding and mudslides at the Victoria Hills apartments. The City Light study does not indicate or measure the tremendous volumes of water that flow across this site. Two, Renton City Code 1986 was amended to read R-3 zoning (4-2709) that only 17 units per acre. are allowed. Much of the 3.3 total acres . cannot be used due to steep. and unstable slopes, which would reduce . the number of permitted units. Also, even if all 3.3 acres could be • used, only 56 units could be. built -- not the proposed 70 . units. Three, the City Light Apartment traffic study only reports how many cars will leave the City Light location. The study does not mention the already more than 8,000 vehicle trips per day on Benson Road that can often back up from Puget Drive to 31st So. ,at peak traffic. Nor does the study mention that only 150 feet from their . driveway is • the only entrance and exit to the 176-unit Victoria Hills apartments. The City Light report does not mention that the Victoria Hills apartments have failed to widen Benson Road as per the PUD and that the projected cost has now , risen to $1.3 million from the original . $885,000 and that it is in dispute . with the city about paying to widen the road. The apartments would channel cars and increased traffic through the neighboring Victoria Hills residential neighborhood. Additional apartments 'would lead to further accidents and gridlock for Benson Road. Four, the City Light apartments had no application for a Routine Vegetation Management Permit required by Renton's Land Clearing and • Tree Cutting Code and SEPA. . It is apparent that there are a number of city and state violations • i . . I CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM NOV 281989 RECEIVED DATE: November 28, 1989 TO: Lenora Blauman, Senior Planner FROM: Kim Scattarella, Stormwater Engineering Speciali SUBJECT: CITY LIGHTS; RESPONSE TO CITIZENS' COMMENTS Cs i 7— S-9 The environmental review of City Lights has been conducted in a thorough manner, with coordinating of all environmental comments amongst Public Works, and the Planning Divisions. It is recognized that this is an environmentally sensitive area. It is located immediately upstream from Victoria Hills, which was an environmentally sensitive area. In response to Mr. Post's letter, Victoria Hills has posed many problems, particularly in Erosion Control. These issues were well documented by the Storm Water Utility Division, and an effective Erosion Control Plan was implemented, which eliminated further downstream problems during the winter of 1989. There are numerous subterranean springs onsite at Victoria Hills that contributed to erosion problems. Both Victoria Hills and City Lights sites have numerous subterranean springs. Thus, similar Erosion Control Plans will be proposed. The main difference is that the potential erosion hazard mitigation for City Lights are known from Victoria Hills, and will be used from the beginning of construction. These mitigation measures will include construction of interceptor ditches with rock check dams, hydroseeding with jute matting on exposed slopes, extensive silt fence usage, catch basin protection, and also the preservation of significant vegetation on steep slopes. The completion of construction at Victoria Hills has significantly lessened erosion potential downstream by stabilizing the site, and having hydroseeded an stabilized the formerly exposed lower slopes. The City Lights Apartments will be closely monitored during the construction phase, which can only occur between May 1 and Sept. 1. This can only occur after a satisfactory temporary erosion control plan has been provided. The attached memo to Dick Anderson expresses the main concerns of Stormwater Utility about the proposed City Lights Apartments development. CLENV/KDS cc: Dick Anderson Chuck Price Attachments • • CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM • DATE: November 22, 1989 TO: Dick Anderson, Utilities Mgr. jam; FROM: Kim Scattarella, Stormwater Operations Specials SUBJECT: CITY LIGHTS ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW CONDITIONS Based upon the Environmental Review of City Lights, the following conditions applicable to stormwater requirements. The 25 year storage/5 year release is sufficient for this region. In addition to this, the engineer will have to simulate a 100 year storm through the stormwater detention system , and downstream (these requirements have not yet been relayed to the engineer). If the 100 year storm event produces significant • impacts, then the facilities will be designed to mitigate impacts to ensure that there are no adverse impacts to property, life or safety ( i.e. no flooding of arterials to prevent emergency vehicle access). Drainage policies have already been developed as documented in the plan review checklist to address erosion control. Erosion control for this project will haveto be adequately addressed before plan approval. The case of Victoria Hills is well- documented, and a similar.Erosion control plan will be required. This will include construction of interceptor ditches with rock check dams, hydroseeding with jute matting on exposed slopes, silt fence protection, and catch basin protection, using silt fence on top of catch basins, and construction of berms to prevent erosion. cc: Chuck Price Y • P[.P !KING DIVISION'. g (;!-1 OF RENTON ''ilr N rr • ;., - November 17, 1989 LI: NOVr 1 .7 1989 . `f` I�� III �1f� •l�_� I 1 s:. Fred Kaufman *;.'• 200 Mill Avenue 'y �,_,. Renton, WA 98055 • RE: ECF SA-087-89 CITY LIGHT APARTMENTS, Benson Road & So. 26th Dear Mr. Kaufman: . •' - • First of all, we were shocked . to see that the posted signs read no environmental impact was • done for the site. We see little difference between this site and the proposed Forest Crest Apartments which had . significant problems with storm water drainage, school district issues, . - : 7: : • xi';...,. . sewer restrictions, traffic, and cumulative effects from the apartments �Y;" • .surrounding . the site. Granted, this site is smaller;' but..'it;\will''have: ::;,: ,,; ! severe repercussions for the area. We are opposed to the' apartments ` fot the following reasons: ''3s` .''' ./ One, Renton, in their Environmentally Sensitive Report (1986), has a: +; . :.� designated this area as a severely environmentally unstable area with x . 25-40% slopes. The road is located -directly above a major: arterial, =; 4 - Benson Road, which handles in excess of -8,000 vehicle trips - per day. • ..: • It is bordered to the north • by a Seattle water main which is 5 feet - in diameter as well as a natural gas main. The east border adjoins Nelson Middle School at a sheer hillside that is teeming with . ^a'�'e'•'i� ;rr.:��;- '- ', subterranean springs and run-off. ' The water that flows off this _! ' `k:_. hillside has caused severe flooding and mudslides at the Victoria ~- \• Hills apartments. The City Light study does not indicate or measure % : = 'the tremendous volumes of water that flow across this site. �1'4�^• Two, Renton City Code 1986 was. amended to read R-3 zoning (4-2709) .v m that only 17 units per acre- are .allowed., Much of the .3.3 total acres • : rs� cannot be used. due to steep. and unstable slopes, which would reduce ` the number of permitted units. Also, even if all 3.3 acres could be y`= used, only 56 units could be built -- not the proposed 70 units. ::''4 : •<a ' Three, the City Light Apartment traffic 'study only reports how many °•• { cars will leave the City Light location. The study does • not mention -.q ,. "�' ; the already more than 8,000 vehicle trips per day on Benson Road , that can often back up from Puget . Drive to 31st So. at peak traffic. - ; .. Nor does the study mention that only 150 feet ftom their driveway is .the only entrance and exit to the 176-unit Victoria Hills apartments. The City Light report does not mention that the Victoria Hills apartments have failed to widen Benson Road as per the PUD and that f: the projected cost has now , risen to $1.3 million from the original ' $885,000 and that it is in dispute . with the city about paying to widen )4,•:- the road. The apartments would channel cars and increased traffic through the neighboring Victoria Hills residential neighborhood. • `` `,• Additional apartments would lead to further accidents and gridlock for % Benson Road. . Four, the City Light apartments had no application for a. Routine �,'-.` Vegetation Management Permit required by Renton's Land Clearing and Tree Cutting Code and SEPA. . ' It is apparent that there are a number of .city and state violations , • ' gyry.y.. r. a, r . . for this site that wouldpreclude its development. Also, there are a P number of missing reports: Environmental, drainage, unstable or • "'`'� ' excessivelysteep slopes, SEPA studies, Benson traffic studies, sewer f, +.::r •-,;.-^*F connections, and the fact that the Victoria Hills apartments never -'•'; _r widened Benson Road and is in dispute with. the city-,on• .; ry.-on.aheir cost of '!.. 'i`4`.'the •-$1.3 million minimum for widening of Benson. -- .3.; - t'A '°'^' • .41 Please inform us of your findings. • 1z• '. Sincerely, •• g• ,, Georg Post e-71• ,3 Y Victoria Hills resident-= " - " .,.1.122 South 27th Place • :'.,: Renton, WA 98055 . x,,.Phone: 235-4147 :., • s r.. z r ', / } ;::'f ., x xH,'` .. ,, y ...tk • a.r. A s r� �V�. '' % ':, • =fit G n' f 1 F • for this site that would preclude its development. Also, there are a number of missing reports: Environmental, drainage, unstable or excessively steep slopes, SEPA studies, Benson traffic studies, sewer • connections, and the fact that the Victoria Hills apartments never widened Benson Road and is in dispute with the city on their cost of the $1.3 million minimum for widening of Benson. Please inform us of your findings. Sincerely, GeorgL Post Victoria Hills resident 1122 South 27th Place Renton, WA 98055 . Phone: 235-4147 41. A-T. , \ \ • .. f ENVIRONMENTAL ,........._ s' 1 DECLARATION ECF; SA-087-89 APPLICATION NO. PROR SS, ED ACTION • IGHTS APARTMENTS APPLICANT SEEKS SITE PLAN. APPROVAL FOR A 61 UNIT APARTMENT COMPLEX TO BE LOCATED ON A VACANT 3.3 ACRE R-3, MULTI-FAMILY •', RESIDENTIAL, ZONED PARCEL. i • GENERAL LOCATION AND OR ADDRESS PROJECT IS LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF BENSON ROAD BETWEEN PUGET DRIVE AND SOUTH 26TH STREET ACROSS FROM VICTORIA HILLS APARTMENT ' COMPLEX. POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED g PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. , ' THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ' COMMITTEE CE.R.C.3 HAS DETERMINED THAT THE '.. PROPOSED ACTION • • ❑®DES • NODES NOT ,� HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT ❑WILL ' I WILL NOT rf •. BE REQUIRED. , • THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. ' i COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY '`' AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER • BY 5:00 },i P.M., DECEMBER 18, 1989. } FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING.DIVISION AT 235-2550. • -� DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE __ _ WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION - • CERTIFICATION - I , Ma s a Maly. Say L , HEREBY .CERTIFY THAT 3 COPIES OF • Tir At,r,r rrr IIMC�iT I.ICD� Dr1CTC! , RV MG T1� `�� rnntcDTrnmic i N .0T I c E . ENVIRONMENTAL ARATioN ECF; SA-087-89 APPLICATION NO. PROPOSED ACTION LIGHTS APARTMENTS • APPLICANT SEEKS SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR A 61 UNIT APARTMENT COMPLEX TO BE LOCATED ON A VACANT 3 . 3 ACRE R-3 , MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, ZONED PARCEL. • GEN ERAL LOCATION AND OR ADDRESS PROJECT IS LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF BENSON ROAD BETWEEN PUGET DRIVE AND SOUTH 26TH STREET ACROSS FROM VICTORIA HILLS APARTMENT COMPLEX. POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE E E.R.C. 3 HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION EJDOES NODES NOT • HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT DWILL i WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. . • THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS - OPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. CDMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH TH.E RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., DECEMBER 18, 19 8 9 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON. PLANNING DIVISION AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION a_�{•��'�±�aPI'4Y .Y 7..7...^ml:.l'LTr+ --- 51067 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION L y n n r a i n c V ,being first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the VALLEY DAILY NEWS • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL • DETERMINATION.- • Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week. That said newspapers Environmental Review Committee are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six Renton, Washington gThe Environmental Review Committee months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non- in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King Significance-Mitigated for the following pro- jectsf Count Washington. The ValleyDailyNews has been approved as a legal under the.The orilowon_the Renton Y� g PP g Municipal Code. The following Applicants newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for ` " King County. PubIIC NotiCe have completed a mitigation process. The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Kent Edition Service Linen Supply, Inc. , Renton Edition XX , Auburn Edition , (and not in ECF; SA-106-89 Application for administrative site plan supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers approval for the construction of a parking during the below stated period. The annexed notice a r-11 11 1 1 TT r,i- ; r lot having twenty-seven (27) parking stalls. Location of proposal at the southwest inter- section of South Fourth,Street'and.Wells tr-:ivirona�nta. LNtvrininatioa) '?3Scq Avenue South. , City Lights Apartments ECF; SA-087-89 was published on Dec . 4 , 1 Applicant seeks site•plan approval for a 61 unit apartment complex to be located on a vacant 3.3 acre R-3, Multi-Family Resi- dential, zoned parcel.Project is located on The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the the east side of Benson Road between sum of$ ' _ ' - Puget Drive and South 26th Street across from Victoria Hills apartment complex. Further informations,regarding these actions.is available in the Community Development Department,.Current Plan- k �/— ning Division, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. These Determina- tions are FINAL. There is a 14 day appeal period which will end at 5:00 PM.on Subscribed and sworn before me this t,.. day of ;h,,,- - 19 < 9 December 18, 1989. Any appeal of these 2 decisions may be made to the City's Hear- ing Examiner, Municipal Building, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, Washington. An appeal must state clearly, in writing, why the Determination should be revised and ,�i� must be accompanied by a non-refundable 1 :-V` $75.0 filing fee. �/ Published in the Valley Daily News;-on Notify Public for the State of Washington December 4, 1989. R3859 residing at Auburn, King County, Washington VDN#87 Revised 4/89 NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL. DETERMINATION Environmental Review Committee Renton, Washington The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated for the following projects under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. The following Applicants have completed a mitigation process: Service Linen Supply, Inc. ECF; SA-106-89 Application for administrative site plan approval for the construction of a parking lot having twenty-seven (27) parking stalls. Location of proposal at the southwest intersection of South Fourth Street and Wells Avenue South. City Lights Apartments ECF; SA-087-89 Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 61 unit apartment complex to be located on a vacant 3 . 3 acre R-3, Multi-Family Residential, zoned parcel. Project is located on the east side of Benson Road between Puget Drive and South 26th Street across from Victoria Hills apartment complex. Further information regarding these actions is available in the Community Development Department, Current Planning Division, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. These Determinations are FINAL. There is a 14 day appeal period which will end at 5:00 PM on December 18, 1989. Any appeal of these decisions may be made to the City's Hearing Examiner, Municipal Building, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, Washington. An appeal must state clearly, in writing, why the Determination should be revised and must be accompanied by a non-refundable $75. 00 filing fee. Published: December 4, 1989 • VWashington State Duane Berentson OF Department of Transportation Secretary of Transportation District 1 15325 S.E. 30th Place November 17, 1989 Bellevue,Washington 98007-6538 (206)562-4000 Don Erickson PLANNING DIVISION Zoning Administrator CITE'OF RENTON Planning Division Community Development Department NOV 2 1 1989 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 RECEIVE* SR 515 MP 6. 76 CS 1741 Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance City Lights Apartments File No. SA-087-89 Dear Mr. Erickson: This letter is in response to the above MDNS. The project is located on the east side of Benson Road between Puget Drive and South 26th Street across from Victoria Hills apartment complex. The environmental check list states the project is for 70 apartment units while the MDNS uses the figure of 61. Either number represents the potential of adverse impacts to SR 515 intersections inside and outside the corporate limits of Renton. If the traffic study does show an impact (10 or more peak hour trips) at a state highway intersection, the Department of Transportation needs to review and comment on the mitigation measures proposed in the traffic study. Any modification of channelization on a state highway as a form of mitigation, must be approved by the WSDOT. Thank you for the opportunity to review this proposal. Should you have any questions and/or concerns, please feel free to call Donald Hurter (562-4274) or Dick Aust (562- 4269) of my Developer Services Section. Sincerely, ES L. LUTZ, . . tilities/Developer Services Engineer DA:da cc: WSDOT State Aid - MS 121 si CITY OF R,ENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Planning tivision November 9, 1989 f. Melvin R. Easter Johnson Braund Design Group, Inc. P 304 Main Avenue South, Suite 200 Renton, Washington 98055 • . • Re: CITY LIGHTS APARTMENTS ECF; SA-087-89 • Dear Mr. Easter: • This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee and is to inform you that they have completed their review of'the environmental impacts of the above referenced project. The Committee on November 1, 1989 decided that your project may be issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with the following conditions: 1) That the applicant refrain from cutting any trees until the site plan (including the landscaping plan and tree plan) for the proposed development is approved by the City to mitigate impacts to the natural environment; 2) That the applicant be required to provide a traffic mitigation plan which includes off-site improvements adjacent to the site, the retention of the right-of-way easement on Benson Road, and a fair share contribution to regional improvements (including, but not limited to signalization of the Benson Road/S.E. 31st Street intersection). This plan is subject to approval by the Traffic Engineering Division in advance of the issuance of site preparation/building permits; 3) That the applicant be required to provide insulation to limit interior ambient noise in living units and indoor recreation areas to 45 dBA; 4) That the applicant be required to provide a plan for screening at all boundaries of the site, utilizing six foot high standard wood fencing on the north, south and eastern boundaries, and wood fencing, rockeries or a brick/masonry wall on • Benson Road to provide mitigation of light, glare and some noise from the abutting roadway and nearby land uses, as well as to provide site definition which is valuable for personal safety and crime prevention. Specific plans should be subject to approval by the Planning Division and the Public Works Department in conjunction with site plan review. 5) That the applicant be required to provide a plan for a storm drainage management system (including a minimum 25 year storage/5 year release plan • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington '98055 - (206)235-2550 Fnnclmlln 1.911R) 916-96l3 Melvin R. Easter 1. • November 9, 1989 Page 2 [with detention/retention], oil/water separation, and biofiltration) will be !'' • required to be provided; subject to approval by the Public Works Department, in i. advance of the issuance of site preparation/building permits. 6) That the applicant be required to provide a construction management plan , including: a) an erosion control plan, accompanied by an agreement to confine construction activities.which might result in erosion to the period from May 1st to September 1st, and a plan to,hydroseed permeable areas on the site by September 15th -- if the applicant wishes to undertake construction activities during other periods in the year, advance permission must be obtained from the Public Works Department, and a certified soils engineer must be on site at all times when work is underway; b) a plan for wheel-washing of construction trucks prior to departure from the site; c) a plan for periodic watering down of the site to control dust; d) a plan for hauling hours and routes to control traffic impacts; e) a plan for construction hours to mitigate noise impacts; and f) a renewable street clean-up bond in the amount of $2,000.00. These plans are • subject to approval by the Public Works Department, Fire Prevention Bureau, Police Department and Planning Division, prior to the issuance of site preparation and building permits. 7. That the applicant provide a voluntary contribution of $10,675.00 ($175.00 x 61 units) to mitigate off-site recreation impacts. Note #1: At the time of site plan approval, the following recommendations are likely to be made, including, but not limited to requests for: 1) construction of fire equipment access links to structures; 2) changes to landscaping to provide consistency in plantings throughout the site; 3) changes to location of plantings to ensure adequate sight-distance for vehicle/pedestrian traffic; 4) landscaping maintenance bond; 5) fencing for the children's play area; 6) plans for improved exterior illumination; 7) plans for improved signage; 8) plans for pedestrian linkage to Benson Road; 9) revisions to parking plan to increase safety of ingress/egress to parking spaces on the south side of the north driveway to the site; 10) addition of on-site amenities (congregate areas); 11) approved plans for rockeries and/or retention walls (heights, materials, setbacks, etc.); 12) approved plans for relocation of utilities easements and for service systems; 13) • extraordinary services bonding; 14) a management operations plan; 15) a plan for de- icing of driveways to reduce likelihood of collisions; and 16) relocation of covered carports to the eastern-most row of parking stalls. Because the Environmental Review Committee imposed specific mitigation measures rather than issue a Determination of Significance, there is a required fifteen (15) day comment period during which comments are solicited from various agencies, • jurisdictions or individuals (including the applicant) who may have an interest in the Committee's decision. The comment period will end November 21, 1989. Following the end of the comment period, the City will finalize it's Determination unless comments received require a reevaluation. Following the finalization of the Determination, there is a required fourteen (14) day appeal period. Staff urges you to contact the various City representatives, as appropriate, (e.g. the Public Works Department) as soon as possible, to obtain more information concerning • specific mitigation elements recommended for this project, if you have specific ' questions. This information will assist you in planning for implementation of your . Melvin R. Easter • ' ' ' November 9, 1989 �. Page 3 I:. project and will enable you to exercise your appeal rights more fully, if you choose to !; do so. In addition, by the end of the comment period, we should be able to establish a tentative public hearing date before the Hearing Examiner, should a public hearing be necessary. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above please call Lenora Blauman of our office at 235-2550. C: FOR THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Sirce ly, • Donald K. Erickson, AICP . Zoning Administrator • DKE:dm cc: North Bay Development Corp. • 633 N. Mildred, Suite "G" Tacoma, Washington 98406 0 i1 ,.:CITY. dF RENTON.>: <::> : :>: : ::: :< :? ::::::.:.:: >::»:::: CURRENT PLANNING:<::bIVIS:ION ::::`> :» i:::: :::::; ;:::;:;:;::>:>::: :<:: AFFIDAV,I' .OF :SRvi >: :.. .. .: �.:<;::•.... . . .. ..:CE.>:BY;MAIL N :... .::: ::: <::::: >: ::::::::::;: ; :>< On the 841 day of kAoll.e•43eX- , 1.9e1 , I deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing .c,Irler..k mt% a„r,..A c1il7e-rrimna-k►cnnS documents. This information was sent to: Name Representinct tC -11 �. . -L.). l.�fiz wsTZa - Gir- .1 1:3 h M -r0 T t--r. ce. 1A.);IJI;Fc_ • (Signature of Sender) S,h4‘.%%. L. ..." 6!" Subscribed and sworn to me this 9sj day of 111_.tca U , 19sci . No y Public in and for the . • State of Washington residing at' 1-c) therein. PrOD ect Name i(� '' � �r�-�"1 �° 4 OI A0 0k §� Cam, I Pro 'Old Nmb4r . .. ..*t., 1 '8 "7' 8 d A : o1:2-6:4#:k:4011. 1: 1► +$ ' CITY OF RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Planning Division November 8, 1989 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section Mail Stop PV-11 Olympia, WA 98504 Re: Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith are copies of Environmental Determinations and Environmental Checklists for those projects reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee on November 1, 1989: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED BARBEE MILL DREDGING PROJECT ECF; SME-108-89 Application for maintenance dredging at the mouth of May Creek to remove approximately 2,000 cubic yards of materials and 200 cubic yards of material in the log dump area per year for a five (5) year period. Project is located at 4101 Lake Washington Blvd. North, Renton, Washington. CITY LIGHTS APARTMENTS ECF; SA-087-89 Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 61 unit apartment complex to be located on a vacant 3.3 acre R-3, Multi-Family Residential, zoned parcel. (Note: Density level has been adjusted for greenbelt area located on the site.) Project is located on the east side of Benson Road between Puget Drive and South 26th Street, Renton, Washington. The fifteen (15) day comment period for these projects will end on November 21, 1989. Following the end of the comment period, the City will finalize it's Determination unless comments received require a reevaluation. Following the finalization of the Determination, there is a required 14 day appeal period. DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED WINDSOR PLACE II DAY CARE ECF; CU-072-89 Applicant is seeking a new conditional use permit to expand existing day care services for children of residents/employees in order to serve community residents. The project is located at 4310 Building "X", N.E. 5th Street, Renton, Washington. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 Facclmil, /?OR) r l Environmental Determinations November 8, 1989 Page 2' WINDSOR PLACE APARTMENTS II ECF; SA-079-89 Applicant seeks site plan approval to transform the existing day care center (Building ' "X") into a maximum of four new residential ,units. Project is located at 4310 Building "A", N.E. 5th Street (Building "X"). The fifteen (15) day comment period and the fourteen (14) day appeal period for these projects will run concurrently and will end on November 21, 1989. Following the end of the comment/appeal period, the City will finalize it's Determination unless comments received require a reevaluation. • If you have questions, please call Jeanette Samek-McKague or me at 235-2550. • Sin.cerelyl onald K. Erickson, AICP' Zoning Administrator DKE:mjp • cc: Mr. Gerald W. Marbett, King County Bldg. & Land Division Mr. Gregory M. Bush, Metro Department of Wildlife . Mr. Joe Robels, Department of Fisheries " Mr. James Lutz, Department of Transportation • CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO. ; ECF-087-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-087-89 PROPONENT: North Bay Development Corporation Melvin Easter, Johnson Braund Design PROJECT NAME; City Lights Apartments DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 61 unit apartment complex to be j located on a vacant 3 . 3 acre R-3 , Multi-Family Residential, zoned parcel. (Note: Density level has been adjusted for greenbelt area located on the site. ) LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: East side of Benson Road between Puget Drive and South 26th Street across from Victoria Hills apartment complex. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Community Development Department Current Planning Division The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43 .21C. 030(2) (c) . Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-2822 (D) Renton Municipal Code (see attached sheet) . These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340 (2) . Because mitigation measures have been imposed, the lead agency. will not act on this proposal for fifteen (15) days from November 6, 1989. Any interested party may submit written comments which must be submitted by 5: 00 p.m. , November 21, 1989, in order to be considered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period will commence following the finalization of the DNS. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee c/o Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator Current Planning Division Community Development Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 PUBLICATION DATE: November 6, 1989 DATE OF DECISION: November 1, 1989 SIGNATURES: *fr, enneth E. - - i - Communi A . .-e- " ■- •: t z Lynnni. uttman, Director. Public Works Department 'i . DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED MITIGATION MEASURES PROJECT: City Light Apartments PROPONENT: North Bay Development Corporation Melvin Easter, Johnson Braund Design ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: i ECF-087-89 APPLICATION NUMBER: SA-087-89 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 61 unit apartment complex to be located on a vacant 3 . 3 acre R-3, Multi-Family Residential, zoned parcel. (Note: Density level has been adjusted for greenbelt area located on the site. ) LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: East side of Benson Road between Puget Drive and South 26th Street across from Victoria Hills apartment complex. RECOMMENDATIONS: The Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of Non- Significance-Mitigated with the following conditions: 1) That the applicant refrain from cutting any trees until the site plan (including the landscaping plan and tree plan) for the proposed development is approved by the City to mitigate impacts to the natural environment; 2) That the applicant be required to provide a traffic mitigation plan which includes off-site improvements adjacent to the site, the retention of the right-of-way easement on Benson Road, and a fair share contribution to regional improvements (including, but not limited to signalization of the Benson Road/S.E. 31st Street intersection) . This plan is subject to approval by the Traffic Engineering Division in advance of the issuance of site preparation/building permits; 3) That the applicant be required to provide insulation to limit interior ambient noise in living units and indoor recreation areas to 45 dBA; 4) That the applicant be required to provide a plan for screening at all boundaries of the site, utilizing six foot high standard wood fencing on the north, south and eastern boundaries, and wood fencing, rockeries or a brick/masonry wall on Benson Road to provide mitigation of light, glare and some noise from the abutting roadway and nearby land uses, as well as to provide site definition which is valuable for personal safety and crime prevention. Specific plans should be subject to approval by the Planning Division and the Public Works Department in conjunction with site plan review. ;Mitigation Measurep Page 2 5) That the applicant be required to provide a plan for a storm drainage management system (including a minimum 25 year storage/5 year release plan [with detention/retention] , oil/water separation, and biofiltration) will be required to be provided, subject to approval by the Public Works Department, in advance of the. issuance of site preparation/building permits. 6) That the applicant be required to provide a construction management plan including; a) an erosion control plan, accompanied by an agreement to confine construction activities which might result in erosion to the period from May 1st to September 1st, and a plan to hydroseed permeable areas on the site by September 15th -- if the applicant wishes to undertake construction activities during other periods in the year, adv nce permission must be obtained from the Public Works Department,land a certified soils engineer must be on site at all times when work is underway; b) a plan for wheel- washing of construction trucks prior to departure from the site; c) a plan for periodic watering down of the site to control dust; d) a plan for hauling hours and routes to control traffic impacts; e) a plan for construction hours to mitigate noise impacts; and f) a renewable street clean-up bond in the amount of $2, 000. 00. These plans are subject to approval by the Public Works Department, Fire Prevention Bureau, Police Department and Planning Division, prior to the issuance of site preparation permits. 7. That the applicant provide a voluntary contribution of $10, 675. 00 ($175. 00 x 61 units) to mitigate off-site recreation impacts. Note #1: At the time of site plan approval, the following recommendations are likely to be made, including, but not limited to requests for: 1) construction of fire equipment access links to structures; 2) changes to landscaping to provide consistency in plantings throughout the site; 3) changes to location of plantings to ensure adequate sight-distance for vehicle/pedestrian traffic; 4) landscaping maintenance bond; 5) fencing for the children's play area; 6) plans for improved exterior illumination; 7) plans for improved signage; 8) plans for pedestrian linkage to Benson Road; 9) revisions to parking plan to increase safety of ingress/egress to parking spaces on the south side of the north driveway to the site; 10) addition of on- site amenities (congregate areas) ; 11) approved plans for rockeries and/or retention walls (heights, materials, setbacks, etc. ) ; 12) approved plans for relocation of utilities easements and for service systems; 13) extraordinary services bonding; 14) a management operations plan; 15) a plan for de-icing of driveways to reduce likelihood of collisions; and 16) relocation of covered carports to the eastern-most row of parking stalls. mmdoc . • • I:. 4tp• NOTICE 7 ,a'• : ,„, . ::,:::, , • . „..„:„..: •,. : :J ,.: ,n ,:,.,),:: :,„:,1 ; 1: •;.,: t ;:.;,..:;,.:i,. , . ,:::1 . . . :; •,;,. ;:.,::!0,1 . .,•:...• ,: :... i , ENVIR N :4 M ENT ,:.. ....„, ,, , ���� .:,:::i.•••:,::::.:,, ;.:,.,5•1: ,1 AL , •., DECLARATION::,-- ,, i'i] : „ ,. ..� ECF; SA-087-89 APPLICATION NO. 1 PROPOSED ACTION 3 '• 1f + ?� CITY LIGHT APARTMENTS f ,,, . Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 61 unit apartment complex to be, located on a vacant 3.3 acre R-3, Multi-Family f a '' Residential, zoned parcel. !1 i,'t ! is GENERAL LOCATION AND OR ADDRESS .' Project is located on the east side of Benson Road between :Puget J Drive and South 26th Street across from Victoria Hills apartment complex. ' .j POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. i. :>>`' , THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ; ! COMMITTEE [ E.R.C.3 HAS DETERMINED.�� THAT THE,. PROPOSED ACTION :j ❑DOES f DOES NOT 4: " • !'. x''! l HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ; j ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT. ,'f nwILL :�� � � ; *WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. •'' °`'' `,',0 THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS trt'.i 1 PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY November 21, 1989 iff }j,, I ; ; AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY I. . ;,,A BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER -i BY 5:00 P.M., FOR FURTHER fi INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION AT 235-2550. ' DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE ';i: "": ." WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION 'F - CERTIFICATION I , fri 1-- SavJJr_ , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT 3 COPIES OF • • THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN '3 CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON OR NEARBY THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY ON //- g -T7 , ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a . .. . Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington , residing in 4M7jA) on the9(ig SIGNED : 24 4.MY4L. day of O) 1 gq N OT C E ENVIRONMENTAL DEcLARATION • ECF; SA-087-89 APPLICATION NO. PROPOSED ACTION CITY LIGHT APARTMENTS Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 61 unit apartment complex to be located on a vacant 3 . 3 acre R-3, Multi-Family Residential, zoned parcel. GENERAL LOCATION AND OR ADDRESS Project is located on the east side of Benson Road between Puget Drive and South 26th Street across from Victoria Hills apartment .complex. POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE [ E.R.C. ] HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION ❑DOES rADOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT ❑WILL KWILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY November 21, 1989 AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION • .i1Ji,. i AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION ,being first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the VALLEY DAILY NEWS • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week. That said newspapers DETERMINATION are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE monthsprior to the date ofpublication referred to, printed and published RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non- County, Washington. The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal Significance-Mitigated for the following pro- newspaper order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for Mute under the authority of the Renton by P g Municipal Code. King County. Public Notice The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Kent Edition CITY LIGHTS APARTMENTS , Renton Edition - r-'t , Auburn Edition , (and not in ECF; SA-087-89 supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 61 unit apartment complex to be located on during the below stated period. The annexed notice a 1 ' c l_ i ^t� a vacant 3.3 acre R-3, Multi-Family Resi- dential, zoned parcel. Project is located on the east side of Benson Road between Puget Drive and South 26th Street across from Victoria Hills apartment complex. waspublished On This decision will be finalized in 15 days. Written comments received after 5:00 p.m., November 21, 1989 will not be considered. A fourteen (14)day appeal period will com- The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the mence following the finalization of DNS-M. sum of$ The mitigation measures imposed by the. City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Current 4UPlanning Division of the Community Devel- opment Department, Municipal Building, �/ ,yy nn Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: ` (/� �r 235-2550. Published in the Valley Daily News, November 6, 1989. R3806. Acct. #51067 Subscribed and sworn before me this -- -- day of • • 19 r NoU ublic for the State of Washington residing at Auburn, King County, Washington VDN#87 Revised 4/89 NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated for the following projects under• the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. CITY LIGHTS APARTMENTS ECF; SA-087-89 Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 61 unit apartment complex to be located on a vacant 3 . 3 acre R-3 , Multi-Family Residential, zoned parcel. Project is located on the east Side of Benson Road between Puget Drive and South 26th Street across from Victoria 1l118 apartment complex. This decision will be finalized in 15 days. Written comments receivedi after 5: 00 p.m. , November 21, 1989 will not be considered: A fourteen':. (14) day appeal period will commence following the finalization ofi DNS-M. The mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton'si Environmental Review Committee are available at the Current Planning Division of the Community Development Departnientk Municipal Building ° Renton, Washington 98055, . Phone: 235-2550. t• Published: November 6, 1989 JOHNSON BRAUND DES I GROUP, INC. 130 ANDOVER PARK SEATT E, WA981,88SUITE 301 OF D AMOnn[1L J11Q �CC2A0Cvv� 241-0338 '43( -7°)(00 LfW -FAX: 9838-- I 1ai�QO DATE 10 . /2�/t_ • 89 JOB NO. p ATTENTION .` _.1._ /r' ,��/ 1 PROJECT: r j �Y TO �/1 v v' r { 6t/ ✓I S c, WE ARE SENDING YOU: VIA: 0 Prints 0 Mylars ❑ Fax Sheets Including Letter. of Transmittal. Xerox ❑ Other 0 Delivery ,Mail PRINTING: 0 IN-HOUSE 0 OUTSIDE 0 COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION I f fi I44/L c V7c?ri- dEJVVThS OCT 2 (1980 THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: yZ As requested 0 Approved as submitted 0 For approval XFor your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Returned for correction ❑ For review and comment ❑ REMARKS • COPY TO SIGNED: If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. r/ . JOHNSON BRAUND DE V GROUP, INC. • 130 ANDOVER PARK E- ._T, SUITE 301 - �L JL J� �F L, p AKI2kirtJQ SEATTLE, WA 98188 4206)-241-0338 q'�( - 7'7(oO FAX: 211-0338-4 ji -7p', DATE to , 11 .. 6 i JOB NO. so �� ^ ATTENTION V VI •v r4._ ol� TO accigui00:vH .2"f l O, PROJECT: r1 , k..,1s `��/��1�/�V//ce JV� r 0,1 U'lf-y fY I T WE ARE SENDING YOU: VIA: rl Prints ❑ Mylars ❑ Fax Sheets Including Letter of Transmittal. ❑ Xerox g.Other X Delivery ❑ Mail PRINTING: ❑ IN-HOUSE X-OUTSIDE ❑ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 10 I . IaI -�151 Oh , MT V/ f s . r&vl�.ot_ eCO * ; , ti i". 10 An I . 6 j1" x 14 sk r' '/ ►►iors s - � el i PIA Pik , alp 1 P ANNINGI DIVISION CITY OF RENTON OCT 1 9 00 THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: } ❑ As requested ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ For approval H �'�"VII`�' X For your use ❑ Approved as noted 0 Returned for correction ❑ For review and comment ❑ REMARKS Le l vi r-A 2 NA ii ft : -NIL- up/r--W' ke6in tals S S s 'e-- IV IO , ti frVI'ors 1/\i'vi,ir-IetiC_U, fteme.__ . loll-- i -fo cWA yoc net - aciA",--Cor inq9coviippo . COPY TO Oh ` ri(VW SIGNED: 0.2 r If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. �:.:+ '_: .•1 - : '- PIMPING DIVISION , • l'1, ,ILI ,�.;-0. , ij October 18 1989 , . : . - F' , - ' : : ' ' . Lenora Blauman, Planner . , ' ULIN 3i ', , , i 'I i, Community Development Deartment' : , ' ' ' i 1.t4__1. s i_•_ ,' ' City-of Renton ' ' - Department ' y. = - . , . J O H N S O N- B R A U N D' 'Municipal Building,200 Mill Ave:'South ' - - . DESIGN GROUP, INC. Renton, WA 98055 �, ' • • • , • . ,Re: City'Lights Apartments , Our.Project# 88-52 ' • SA: C87 -'89 Lenora: .' - • Attached for your review and re-submittal to the Technical Advisory Committee • ' are (10) sets of revised "site plan approval" documents along with one set'Of 8-1/2 • x 14 "Super.,K" reductions and 2 prints of the revised recreation building floor plan.-. ■ - , Following,'is a'.description of..the specific item's which have been addressed in' - _ response to comments from the"Technical'Advisory-Committee":' , . - ' - . 1. Project density has been seduced from 70 units, to 61 units through the ` ' elimination ' of (8) "B" :type -units ,and (1), "A" type , unit. . ',This ' was ' accomplished by the removal of one entire building. (bldg:#5) ,plus one . - .additional unit from building.#2. , • ' *2: , Per the requirements of the Traffic Engineering Department, 8 feet of right- GREG- L. ALLWINE, AIA :,- of-way, has 'been dedicated-for off-site street improvements. , These . ' MELVIN R. .EASTER,'ASLA , , improvements..will- include: 1/2'left turn lane, one additional northbound ' ' ' lane, curb,gutter and side walk.' ' " - , - ; - " , - . 3. - Building.#3 has'been shifted toLthe south so it is now,22 feet from the north , ) :property,line. In addition,the parking area,east of that building has been ' ' . - , shifted south so it is now 12 feet from,the north property line.: _ ' , - • -4. , •Landscaping along .the ,north and south property, lines -have, been increased and a 6 foot'high screen fence is-also proposed for these two , . ,boundaries. -_ . . ., . • . 5: A significant portion of the existing vegetation in the eastern 1/3 of the site .. ' ' will,be preserved as a natural-and'unique amenity for residents of this ' ' -- -'development. -The only existing. coniferous tree ,(8" cal..•Douglas Fir) ;is , - located in the northeast corner of the property and will be retained. . ' ; ' - • • 6:: * A traffic analysis has been prepared based upon :a ;"scope of work • provided by'the Traffic 'Engineering, Department - This 'study 'includes .a - A R C H-'I T'E C-T U R E, . proposed share formula sfor participation in the design-and installation, L A N .D,, S C A 'P E -, of a future traffic, signal to be located at,S.E: 31st Street/Benson, Road ,. -A,R C H'I T,E C T.1J R E. � , , Intersection as well as an' ,analysis of the traffic impacts this project may - have on the•South Puget Drive/Benson Road in tersection., Three copies.of A N D •'P L A N•N'I N G. this study'wer-e submitted to,the.city at the end of August, 1989. % - " 130 ANDOVER `PARK • • ,. . • ' . . , EAST • SU,ITE' 301 , . • • • ' , • , . , SEATTLE, -WA '98,188 , ' r - ' : ? TEL.206..431 •7960 - _ - , • • - . FAX,•206.43-1'•79,60 _ . ■- . - Lenora Blauman, Planner = City of Renton- . , .City Lights Apartments . '-. October'18, 1989; " , :. " Page 2 7. . The recreation center program and square footage has been expanded to include (2)- , - ` separate,outdoor deck areas, a "warming" kitchen and big-screen'T:V:. in addition to , , -the'spa, exercise room; 'lounge,.manager's`office and restrooms. ' The,building has been separated from the adjacent apartment units a minimum of 20 feet: .Also, 'a ' , covered play area is proposed beneath the.'main floor of the.recreation' building,-a sitting area has'been located between buildings 1 and 2, and a,basketball hoop has • been,located:at the north end of the parking lot. ., ' .* Please note the'attached letter from the Renton School District Superintendent, which re _ iterates our concern regarding the provision of an access'gate and path'to the adjacent • school grounds. -We feel the proposed on-site recreational amenities;package is more than • - sufficient'for this 61 unit apartment complex. ' ' , .` 8. All proposed retaining walls.(concrete) have been eliminated: ,Retaining structures ' -will be limited.to,"rockeries". - - • - - , , , :- , - `9. r. •Per the comments, from 'Public Works--regarding storm water management, the following revisions have been made: ,, a., ', In response`to the letter from Earth Consultants, Inc: dated August 29, 1989 • - .''- (see attached). existing.,drainage swales will be, backfilled and the storm water - _ - from off-site. (east) will be' intercepted,with- a storm drainage (pipe) system:. The existing storm easement will.need'to'be:relocated. • ' b: =In order to mitigate water quality;concerns,,a-significant length of grass-lined bio-filltration swale has`been incorporated along the entire,property frontage at • the western edge of the site. - - : : . I trust the above described. modifications will address all the major issues raised by-the • • Technical Advisory Committee.; It is-our understanding the project will go back-to "Tech ' ' - 'Committee" Friday, .October-27, 1989, and then on to "Environmental.Review Committee" ' . , the following week. Please do not hesitate to.call if.you 'have questions or you need , - 'additional information: ;- , ' Sincerely, ; 'JOHNSON'BRAUND DESIGN GROUP, INC. ' ' , , - Melvin..R. Easter, ASLA , _ MRE/sjw A85221 • ` • ', . ' • cc: , John Miller?-'North Bay Development - . ";Greg.Diener- Pacific Engineering , . - . , - .' ' ' ' 'Attachments' ` , , . ' ro` enfon z' c tioo1 ulsfri cf 403 E1-`1 Mn 1 T.. T 435 Main Avenue South, Renton, Washington 98055 iur • 403 • OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT ryyt..:•MS. October 13, 1989 .;g Ms. Lenora Blauman, Planner City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue S Renton, Washington 98055 Dear Ms. Blauman: The Renton School District has been contacted by the North Bay Development Corporation relative to the City of Renton requirement for gate access from the proposed City Lights Apartments to the Nelsen Middle School grounds. The Board discussed the issue at their meeting on October 11. We recognize why the city would desire access to the adjacent recreational areas. Our only interest is that such a passage does not encourage students to use it as a school pathway from residences west of Benson Road. In the interest of student safety, those students are currently transported to Nelsen Middle School. Sincerely, pLJ NN G DIVISION CITY OF IZENTON 1 • friL CJ89 Gary . Kohlwes ®C i Superintendent 3. GFK:n c Melvin R. Easter, ASLA John Miller Major S. Dhami " fHl ir, 2 1;�: lc cc_i5'�t �_��-�r�T INC P.2 , . f I I , L.. !;1 Earth Con8uInc. . \.1 \k, I ,> �%1 crcxcchr•.icai ksIgirrcrrs,G*OK,st3f,s&Frn'rrcruncr iai St:idMatits August 29, 1989 • E-4215_1 Pacific Engineers . • ' 304 Main Avenue South . Suite 300 PLANNING DIVISION Renton, Washington 98055 •cm(OF REfd1'ON • • . Attention: Mr, Bill, Orth OCT 1 9 1989 . . • Subject: . City. Light Apartments Benson Road South and • • 26th Street South , , . . . Renton, Washington . Dear Sir: . • As requested by you and by the City .of Renton, pie are .providing this;amendment to our geotechnical engineering study regarding the surface-::drainage system present on the above site. Our report dated June 15, 1989 recommended that the swales be backfilled and the drainage re-routed to the project's newly established storm drain system. There are two significant erosion alignments•or swales trending east/West across the property. The northern and deeper swale originates on the property`at'the base of the•steeper eastern slope, approximately eighty (80) feet from the eastern property line. It is of recent origin, possibly the result of runoff from graded areas to the east. There is no evidence that this swale'is a long-term erosional feature. Older swales usually contain peat, layers of organic- rich sediments, or complex erosional features. This swale displays none of these features. • We recommend that this swale be backfilled and the intermittent flow be collected upslope of the development and diverted into the project storm drainage'system. The less prominent drainage swale located near the center of the property line originates very near the eastern property line but collects much less runoff from the property to the east. The physical features of the swale are similar to those of the northern drainage. In this case, also, the runoff should be collected anti diverted to the storm drainage collector system. . The baclfill of both swales should follow the recommendations outlined in our June IS, 1989 report. The swale should be cleaned out to fresh glacial till exposures, benched, and structural fill placed up to building•foundation grade. If a culvert is placed in the fill, the pipe must be sized to the runoff estimates determined by the civil engineer and bedded in • accordance with standard practice. We will be happy to provide recommendations on request. . . 1805. 138lh Place N.E.,Suite 101,Bellevue,Washington 98005 222 E.26th Street,Suite 101,Tacoma.Wasntngton 98411.9998 Bellevue(206)643-3780 Seattle(206)464.1584 FAX(206)746.0860 Tacoma(205)2724608 AUG 29 '89 13:12 28 T21 5O2ANTS INC Pacific Engineers "E•4218-1 August 29, 1989 Page 2 In conclusion, the existing drainage swales are not considered permanent, long-terra features but relics of changes in runoff patterns. generated by recent upsiope •construction. Their removal and the proper collection of upsiope runoff will minimize future erosion on this and adjacent property. If we can be of further assistance, please call our office. Very truly yours, S EARTH CONSULTANTS, INC. • • • • R. I Bielefeld, P.E.. • Project Manager 'B/.GM/sar . . • • • Earth Consultants, inc. (4:140-45-t . Renion School Disfricl 403", % . . ,,,,,, x , , . , z )°-- -,,r---- e., 435 Main Avenue South, Renton, Washington 98055 4 O3 OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT ' CITY OF RENTON October 13, 1989 , OCT 17 1989 FIT n1p C f Ms. Lenora Blauman, Planner City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue S Renton, Washington 98055 Dear Ms. Blauman: The Renton School District has been contacted by the North Bay Development Corporation relative to the City of Renton requirement for gate access • , from the proposed City Lights Apartments to the Nelsen Middle School grounds. The Board discussed the issue at their meeting on October 11. We recognize why the city would desire access to the adjacent recreational areas. Our only interest is that such a passage does not encourage students to use it as a school pathway from residences west of Benson Road. In the interest of student safety, those students are currently • transported to Nelsen Middle School. Sincerely, 41 9fiditeesiG/ . Gary Kohlwes Superintendent GFK:n ' c Melvin R. Easter, ASLA John Miller Major S. Dhami PACIFIC ENGINEERft ;OMPANY Civil Engineering Consultants LETTIE ‘CDT ITGQOSISEDITIQIL 304 Main Avenue South, Suite 300 Renton, WA 98055 (206) 235-6688 DATEMA4 JOB NO. 3 FAX: 271-7202 ATTENTrION r,,�� J [(� TO Cyr �(��C ! ►('G�3' 6- P JEC1' J� (�Z 7 WE ARE SENDING YOU: VIA: ❑ Prints 0 Mylars ❑ Fax Sheets Including Letter of Transmittal. Xerox 0 Other 0 Delivery 'Mail PRINTING: Pacific Engineering 0 Repro House 0 COPIES DATE NO. / DESCRIPTION . C-462i COrev/A—lairS L Y THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ As requested ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ For approval or your use 0 Approved as noted 0 Returned for correction ❑ For review and comment ❑ REMARKS AUC 3 i 1989 COPY TO C/ l(- (2 C Z ) �j1l�'!l L✓s(1 ' - /L t7 SIGNED: 1Z(.4.ge / / Q G'1 ��Jl� �,�� If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. - HUGS 29 '89 16:26 EARTH lialcULHNTS Ii : P.2 I 1 I• "; Earth Consultants Inc. ji 1/ rutra:hnlcal Engnl.:i:rs.C,i(Gkig,sls&6nvirunnirtita sclr ,I,i-. August 29, 1989 E-4218-1 Pacific Engineers 304 Main Avenue South Suite 300 Renton, Washington 98055 Attention: Mr. Bill Orth Subject: City Light Apartments Benson Road South and 26th Street South Renton, Washington Dear Sir: As requested by you and by the City of Renton, we are providing this amendment to our geotechnical engineering study regarding the surface drainage system present on the above site, Our report dated June 15, 1989 recommended that the swales be baclo'illed and the drainage re-routed to the project's newly established storm drain system. There are two significant erosion alignments or swales trending east/west across the property. The northern and deeper swale originates on the property at the base of the steeper eastern slope, approximately eighty (80) feet from the eastern property line. It is of recent origin, possibly the result of runoff from graded areas to the east. There is no evidence that this swale is a long-term erosional feature. Older swales usually contain peat, layers of organic- rich sediments, or complex erosional features. This swale displays none of these features. We recommend that this swale be backfilled and the intermittent flow be collected upsiope of the development and diverted into the project storm drainage system. The less prominent drainage swale located near the center of the property line originates very near the eastern property line but collects much less runoff from the property to the east The physical features of the swale are similar to those of the northern drainage. In this case, also, the runoff should be collected and diverted to the storm drainage collector system. The backfill of both swales should follow the recommendations outlined in our June 15, 1989 report. The swale should be cleaned out to fresh glacial till exposures, benched, and structural fill placed up to building foundation grade. If a culvert is placed in the fill, the pipe must be sized to the runoff estimates determined by the civil engineer and bedded in accordance with standard practice. We will be happy to provide recommendations on request. 1805. 136th Place N E.,Suite 101,Bellevue,Washington 98005 222 E.26th Street,Suite 101,Tacoma,Washington 98411.9998 Betievue(206)643-3780 Seattle(206)464-1584 FAX(206)746•0860 Tacoma(206)272.6608 40 AUG 29 '89 16:27 EARTH CQNSULANTS INC P. 3 Pacific Engineers • E-4218-1 August 29, 1989 Page 2 In conclusion, the existing drainage.swales are not considered permanent, long-term features but relics of changes in runoff patterns generated by recent upslope construction. Their removal and the proper collection of upslope runoff will minimize future erosion on this and adjacent property. If we can be of further assistance, please call our office. Very truly yours, EARTH CONSULTANTS, INC. /// R. J. Bielefeld, _' Project Manager RJB/GM/sar • Earth Consultants, Inc, - • ,- • -EDACIF1C INOIZINEERING COMPANY CIVIL ENGINEERING AND PLANNING CONSULTANTS NANNING DIVISION CM OF RENTON ,AUG 3 i 1989 August 29 , 1989 E r r Mr . Chuck Price Storm Water Utility Engineering City of Renton • 200 Mill Ave . S . Renton, Wa 98055 Subject : Comment letter dated August 8 , 1989 . City Lights Apartments 51-1 Our job: 88-93 Mr. Price : This letter recaps our meeting with Garth Cray on August 17 , 1989 and our phone conversation with you on August 24 , 1989 . Each item is addressed as follows : 1 . ) Mr. Dick Bealafeld of Earth Consultants , Inc . is investigating the open drainage channel and its possible erosion problem . When our office receives his report , we will send you a copy for review. Rerouting of this sLorm drainage will be permitted per the plan if his report indicates erosion in the open channel . 2 . ) A temporary erosion control plan will be provided with the building permit set . A note on the plan will indicate that the May 1st to September 1st construction window applies to grading and utility installation , and that this window may be modified with city public works approval. 3 . ) The on-site detention system will not be located within the , roadway right-of-way or slope/utility easement ( see new plans attached) . 4 . ) The on-site detention will be sized for a 25 year storm with a 5-year release rate . All existing detention ( low areas ) will be accounted for: in the detention design . 5 . ) Baffled oil/water separators will be added to the final design. The on-site storm plan has been revised to include maximum use of bio-filtration ( see new plans attached) . GREG A. DIENER P.E. 206/23S-66E18 304 MAIN AVENUE SOUTH, RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 I hope these comments and/or changes meet with your approval . Please call if you have any questions . Sincerely, PACIFIC ENGINEERING COMPANY Bill Orth cc : Ms . Lenore Blauman, City of Renton Planning Mr. Mel Easter, Johnson Braund Design Group Mr. John Miller, North Bay Developement SA ' .:'-1EMORANDUM To Date From �- . '�^-��- Subject Q_Ai c Q IF2-‘sv—Q-iLA \i rYst 101_ 93 0-6 \ I • c 1 $ • CITY OF RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Planning Division • • • August 15, 1989 • Bruce Muckian • ' f Computer Services Supervisor . Renton School Dist`ict #403' • 435 Main Avenue South • • Renton, WA 98055 • . Subject: School Information for Apartment Projects City Lights Apartments East side of Benson Road between Puget Drive/South 26th • ECF SA-087-89 Dear Mr. Muckian: Thank you for you, response (July 24, 1989) to my request for information regarding the , impacts on the Renton School District of a 70 unit apartment development that is proposed to be located on a vacant 3.3 acre R-3 zoned parcel located on the east side of Benson Road between South Puget Drive and South 26th Street. You requested additional information on this project to assist the School District in its planning process. We will be happy to assist you in any way we can, but the expected completion date of the project and the expected full occupancy date are very difficult, if not impossible, to predict when a project first enters the zoning review process. The additional information you requested for the above referenced project is as follows: 1. Thirty-six of the proposed units are one bedroom units. 2. The remain er of the proposed units (70 total) are two bedroom units. 3. This apartment complex will be regular market rate housing. • • • • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington -98055 - (206)235-2550 Facsimile (206) 235-2513 Bruce Muckian August 15, 1989 Age 2 4. The expected completion date of this project is impossible to predict with any degree of accuracy. At this time, the project has been reviewed by the City's Technical Review Committeej but still must be reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee, an environmental determination must be made, and a Public Hearing must be held by the Land Use Hearing Examiner. We likely will be asking the District for additional information on several other apartment complex applications during the year and will try to address your concerns when providing background inforrriation on these projects. We hope that an early exchange of project information between the City's Current Planning Division and the School District will assist both the City and District in better addressing our future needs. • Thank you again for your assistance. Sinc rely, Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE/MBS:mjp • Johnson Braund. �� - PLANNING DIVISION CL E�� 3 OQ F �_l11 L�1 LN�J LIULJ ITTM L� vb design group, ,c. crrYo,;RoN 304 MAIN AVE. S. SUITE 200 RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055AUG 7 1989 DATE JOB NO. (206) 271-7200 (206) 623-5732 ��// (11 pp�a, �� 7 ` �® Z FAX (206) 271-7202 ,l b y `E qy ED ATTENTION inn5 1 /O n TO of' oci- to h RE. e, I/ u 1 s pic ❑ JBDG OTHER: > WE ARE SENDING YOU ITOAttached 0 Under separate cover via the following items: 0 Shop drawings X Prints 0 Plans 0 Samples 0 Specifications [Copy of letter 0 Change order ❑ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 2 1 reG YeaA--I2 r\ covvri/K o in # ,4 VI i 1 tj: v M. : var (i Ire ; eh THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: O For approval ❑ Approved as submitted 0 Resubmit copies for approval For your use 0 Approved as noted 0 Submit copies for distribution > .As requested 0 Returned for corrections 0 Return corrected prints ❑ For review and comment 0 • ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 0 PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS COPY TO �� ( SIGNED: til 4461 PRODUCT240-3 f east Inc,0mfnn,Mass 01471. If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. August 4, 1989 • Lenora Blauman, Assistant Planner • City of Renton Municipal Building • 200 Mill Ave South • Renton, WA 98055 Re: City Lights Apartments Our Project #88-52 SA: ECF -087-89 Ms. Blauman: As a result of the very recent requirement by the City of Renton Traffic Engineering Dept. for an additional 8 feet of right-of-way dedication on the Benson Road, it is our intent to apply for a variance from the 30 foot front yard building set back requirement. This would still provide a minimum of 22 feet between the proposed structures and the property line. It is our understanding that the dedication is not intended for additional pavement width, but, due to the slope which exists across this r.o.w., more space is needed for possible filling . and retaining on the down hill side. As a supplement to this variance application, we will be providing a letter/report from an acoustical engineer addressing potential noise issues associated with this reduced front yard and possible mitigation solutions (i.e. additional insulation, alternative windows, heavy screening, sound baffling walls, etc. . Also, please note that the buildings are located 30 feet from the street edge after improvement to a 5 lane section and they are elevated 8 to 12 feet above the Benson Road. It is our intent to proceed on the preparation of this variance application as well as a scoped traffic impact analysis immediately following receipt of confirmation from the traffic department on their siDe►ific requirements. However, neither of these items will have significant impact on the site plan as currently proposed. Sincerely, NORTH BAY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 4 tr► Ohn Miller esident sjw A85254 cc: Rick PLANNING DIVISION AUGCITY OF RENToN 71989 4.IaCEIVED %• 0 CITY OF RENTON ..I COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor August 1, 1989 James A. Kurtz 12721 S.E. 189th Place Renton, WA 98058 SUBJECT: City Lights Apartments Site Plan Approval Dear Mr. Kurtz: Thank you for your letter expressing concern about the above referenced project. We try to preserve the "natural area" bordering any new construction within the City but appreciate the fact that the influx of people and construction sometimes contributes to vandalism. I have referred your correspondence to Mr. Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator. Although we can not ensure freedom from vandalism, I feel confident Mr. Erickson will do everything possible within the current regulations to protect the natural area. Sincerely, nneth E. Kl - mmunity Developme erector 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 RECEOF"lYED James A. Kurtz 12721 SE 189th Pl. JUL 31 1989 Renton, WA 98058 oomomNramoupoloW July 28, 1989DEPARIftif Mr. Kenneth Nyberg, Director Community Development Department City of Renton City Hall, 200 Mill St. S. Renton, WA 98055 Dear Mr. Nyberg: As a member of the First Presbyterian Church of Renton I am responding to the City's "Notice of Pending Site Plan Approval" for the City Lights Apartments proposal. I am specifically concerned about the security of our "natural area" adjacent to the south boundary of the proposed development. Over the years I have noted that similar natural areas that border apartments and multi-dwelling complexes and shopping and public areas have been vandalized by foot, bicycle, motorcycle, etc. trespassers. I therefore respectfully suggest that the developer be required to install a fence; probably 8' chain link topped with barbed wire; along the full length of boundary common to the proposed complex and the church property. I know of no plans that indicated that the church intends to improve all or part of the "natural area". Yours truly, /e /6:4— ames A. Kurtz / (.1_n . • • • �:_.rsrisuuin'.aai+nwa..'u'._meaul,®,+7av'a • 5}ve..osc� I I ,' �',% . ;Iv %:. _. .•,:asc:..vw:wms.... :.w.:oraw.:w:.:cr.a.,: :a�1,ti�.,,.. .3:''; u. / , t• 7. • • P'� • a7 ai��r " • • • NOTICE OF PENDING SITE PLAN APPROVAL ' • • •• RENTON, WASHINGTON A Site Plan Application has been filed and accepted with the Planning Division of theescrbes the application Community Development Department. The following briefly di • and the necessary Public Approvals, - i • • • DE CR na CITY LIGHTS APARTMENTS • ECF; SA-087-89 •..• ' Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 70 unit apartment complex to be located on• a • vacant 3.3 acre R-3, Residential Multi-Family, zoned parcel. (Note: Density level has been adjusted for greenbelt on-site.) • • • ' S'iENERAL LOCAum• fl ,�•1 • l • East Side•of Benson Road between Puget Drive and South • �' v 26th Street. fl��E,.� • PU • DLi . APPROVA S • • o Environmental Review • o Site Plan Approval • o Building Permit Approval • • • The application can be reviewed at the Planning Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to Public Hearings, during Public Ilcarings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval. For further information on the application or dates of final action by the City, please contact the , Planning Division at 235-2550. • ' • • • • •__ • , • ■■■w�iuo • LI. .. NUN Oe■o_—aouawrw/i i i u • „..,„, . . • . \ „.,....-----Q I i - 7 /X..... 1 i• . • • • • • n f I :�.� . I' a PROJECT SITE//I 1I,' L -- �6 I2 �•' 4,'� oea —1� A • • ! I I I • 1 • , \-A. .:Tr4'-ikh-H1 ... ' 1, J l' • . t' iL \ .. \'•.I •—7 '• \ • , . Ili \4\1”-3 ': ',\ '\,,,,,l' \"%. 11).- '50r . !,,,•/. • • °� ir o L.�' 00001 ,• fit• • i ° •I\�^ \ • P ) f} 1\\\' t;sITl , Ail: ,l3\ rNe• •\ 6 R .. • • r b' 11' ' re ,•� P I \• �`1\ Irv, 41 .,•"' i^1,11 s : .11 I SI i1`S \.\ e, YT • . . 1 I , .1 I ; . 1 I ! a 00` R e � � \l\ \ ;gyp •: l I 1 R _ 1 ' ' Q ix01.1 \ V- , 1 1, . 1. i \1 \ . ‘.. 19' 111 1 1, . d i - • ', • . !1 tit ' ° • . ------- 1 .---.. -,A. • . i ' .o.1•..‘• \-—7:M---.---7g,.. 1 o 1 •�I• eitle ' .r....'� j �1 1 (• 1 I 11 ' R w ,! ,11TI 1 �� � o 0 11' 1 0 // i.. ii .. rr ° a • °} ` Y I ., __ ��• . d• . I �— -.°_ ° 11. , : - -o 404 ...\ ..:.:\.: re I .....re- . \I. ., ,.;_i.c.il' -_--.Ili.----r-R-0--- -::11.aiiii4 ,01-0.---.—17. : ":VS-1:.:4t.1101...:\ • • : j I.\ rn °iI It - i : 4 x. ' ' I .. li\. , \ 1 1. 'IV . • • •. " e a ::;°v 1• �° 1 . 3.! la 0•i ill' D , , . .: .: V.5. \ . '' 1 k " -• - \ ! 1 yd. i t ,I • . i � n I� R � is it 111r, 1 lido; 1 1 ��� I qlm _I I I\\ ,a • i I.l I'l 11 i .I —4. • il 1 I[7411111 1 1 1� �. 'I I I 1*r • , 1 I © 01 ICI✓ ,.1 • t I �S. > ` ? J: I ' I1Z i ail I11(rl 1111I R 1I 1 o I 1 T-1, • • 1I II Ii lir. I p V, r ■ r" c O : .•! i Ir • I • 11 • =R follill� I • ----i-' :, • 1 1 � r}�1 '• F. GregL.Allwlne. AlA —L'II • ''•1 � \ • II III HEN • F.:V.'dale:u•3e'1• ..t wIn•r ua".ins:irnc. lnlrsl mg. • OM. M 1r1. '•l •-1Z liiJ(' '' '.•.� _ ' main ave.so.svile200 radon. ..ry,r/700 627.513i. I MelEasle; ASIA • - Ca / - : 7__ - ._ " - ' ,. vorgiTir avr _- r R .:r . f n-I o f 4g5d� wf T,l of r 2 -5-Tv- /IPTQ7/-rpm rgY•hviltrd. y#91t/11/ -/-%iciablt-A1 . • Fi -1/,„ky x rp c -r1-7w --61.40,ev, Jo oii iio-,ipvi.L---?-dig , ,_.: i w-g-� pl-igv,,rir -u -- �� _ or", rir-4 /-1.�-";ter__ ---_ ----;177-cmit—s-x-gmrps-4 cf04 02 vapy q rierar .ate -- -- uric- -rig.? - 1. ..__Tor, 614/-257-4,--07 /2:y -FcTiv c;77i-- 7i, --gveclavve-ii -kill:7 - ;FitirtraTOr" 5-11 47P0,--d - ---1.4 riy----1-5-5-7;71-v- • • 7 1----- WprOY 17 -kr/VV-p, ct -,7r- 76,- e- ZIP 7� a 07 •Vyr_F 41 T r-7, • . j,9 -:-/2-g-V. --e/ 047 -2k-y, --t,rg5v-r•? 575-yg ,te :-___ ___..yVii Litio k — 4ft.--------- '% aft 4_a _wityili'vg - _ _ - ._$_ --W77-4-777/4/5-- -er ,--;tg 7 9/ Tir en TA-Pi d - 714 , .111-- i rrvickyv :Fy , . , , v------s-pro.--15-troc/ - hirepro-.9-it -7-7 j-- `pt;/ ag a t frerna L , A or V N .. 17a- P cIH ' _..... . ..sue d vp7.a(d 57 vii . : . - 5�; . ' .._._- -- rr 7 , co -(7----rg-7,-awLf-r-dvp wait - 77Zd5' kiltfigtow-v- 7-1. v ,ICI 5-p9,7- 7-rirvi -77Tr-rgrit71-77177trf Ipri---.(7' P'- 17M --- --gvrwfr //(j7 s v/FS i v s r __ r, _ -_-- -ypi---i,--rverre7-ro-- .71-✓l--gf ail__ H€sootpwr Trt::),-7 k://7 v---, 57(-7-777:7z,v-5- ..pip-xe ,:_yy __,_ V P. ; NOV . -_ 7/-C -6-arjie ' 2,- I vi r� B A, .-r ' -h &tuner 113 u4 w el/ se 11 mh deeitteaklgal 2n e -6e `f a n , 5&112i91/- a_s Q /45/-- re�01^/- and t22u1Y'/- aJ/ , uta1 _5&I7A4cles Ae- 4,Masur ,,/wn 7'i d ease Men 9- /iiie-P ff )n I IV 6e5_9 oWJr '64_ AA � 1-1Ac'• f - .Ja e _._._. Ir • { j 40 CITY OF RENTON PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Traffic Engineering Division August 16, 1989 Mr. John Miller President, North Bay 633 North Mildred, Suite g Tacoma,WA 98406 RE: CITY LIGHTS APARTMENTS 2500 Block of Benson Road ECF; - 087 - 89 Dear Mr. Miller: I would like to take this moment to reemphasize the position of the Transportation Services Division concerning your project and any new development that has an impact concerning the intersection of . Benson Road & SE 31st Street. This intersection presently warrants a ' traffic signal to alleviate the congestion and delay that the public is ,experiencing. Any new development utilizing this intersection will have a negative impact upon the environment unless measures are taken to change these conditions. The options that are open as the City sees them are to approve but delay new development until the City can fund a new signal, or new development could contribute a • reasonable fee towards the construction of the required signal. Following our meeting of August 7, 1989, I conducted an estimate of the construction costs to design and build a traffic signal at the intersection of Benson Road & SE 31st Street. If you find the expenses listed on the attached estimate to be in line with your own experience in• construction, then this estimate could be agreed upon to serve as the basis for any SEPA traffic mitigation measures for your project. I think a reasonable traffic mitigation fee could be tied to the percentage of new PM peak traffic versus total existing PM peak traffic that. enters the intersection would represent the' amount of mitigation required by the City. The cost. of the new signal according to my estimate would be $114,352 and to use Benson Place Apartments as an example, along with the information supplied by the study conducted by The Transpo Group, Inc. , the mitigation fee would be: Benson Place Apt. PM Peak 14 vehicles Existing Traffic PM Peak 1028 vehicles 14 / 1028 = 1.36% of $114,352 or $1557.32 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2620 Facsimile (206) 235-2513 // Mr. John Miller August 16, 1989 page 2 This percentage is slightly higher than the study by Transpo, but provides the city with a constant to check every new project (ie. 1028 existing vehicles) . These funds would be initially used towards the design of the signal (Phase I) , when sufficient funds are collected, and then subsequent development would be used to pay for the construction of the signal (Phase II) . As in all mitigation fees, if the public cannot spend the funds towards this agreed upon project within a five-year period, then the funds would be returned to the developer. If you find the information proposed in this letter to your understanding, then please signify by writing to Ms. Lenora Blauman, Current Planning Division, with your proposed mitigation fee. As in all new development, if you can find some other means of not having an impact on the above mentioned intersection, we are ready to review any proposal you might have. Respectfully, '12411 9f' Richard H. Nordon Ass't Transportation Planning Engr. Attachment cc: Gary Norris, Trans. Systems Manager Clint Morgan, Traffic Specialist ...Lenora Blauman, Senior Planner John Nason John Nason Architect Benson Road & SE 31st Street File • r INTERSECTION SIGNALIZATION ESTIMATE for Benson Road & SE 31st Street 1. Saw Cutting 545 if $7,538 2. Trenching & Backfill 1415 if $6,562 3. Intersection Patching 16 tons $900 4. Conduit (all Sizes) 4145 if $10,656 5. Wire (all sizes) 5,378 if $2,440 6. Intersection Lighting 9 loc. $15,938 System 7. Vehicle Detectors 15 loops $11, 099 8. Pedestrian Crossing 4 loc. $6,285 System 9. Signal Heads . & 8 heads $8,688. Installation 10. Traf. Sig. Poles & 3 ea. $10, 625 Installation il. Opticom System 1 ea. $4,480 12. Traffic Sig. Controller, l ea. $10,925 Cabinet & Install. 13 . Pavement Markings lump sum $7,538 14. Traffic Control lump sum $1, 000 SUBTOTAL $98, 156 16.5% Engr. & Inspection $16, 196 TOTAL $114,352 All the prices from above were derived from bids received on the December 2, 1987 bid opening on the SW Sunset Blvd. project with an increase of approximately 4.5% to reflect inflation. - � • M4704 ID exisTINA /_/,wipe iD4DWaY QCI OAF fA /SCDNC. uC zZQ'min. I=—=.1.1=M 4,5 >• ___.......... MD 4WD7 R/1J v rrIII/rlrr ■rrrrrrrrrIMMIIIIII IIM rrrr■ ■rrrrr ■rnr rrrrr rrrrr■ ■rrrrr rural ■rrrr IIIMILLUNIMIUM I111r�llrrrrl�1111M rrrrrr rrrrrr . - �� �� �� 1ll,L� �WlU SWl DILL dl UWtt !Wi !iW W11 tWJtrtrrtrUUrrrrrtyLin iururus■ Ilrrlrrrrururrrrllr/imrrrrr h1Tfurrrr1TRiirrrrrrlflihrrrrhn*lfrrrrhhhlT rrrrdiiAfrlh1uThm trrlrrrMilrrlrlrn>tltrrrrrriR><lrrrrraMirrrrrrilRurrrrfRiltrrrllIIRfIIIrIIMITIrrrrrrUTltrrrrrtiSitrrrrlfnRd \ . /go' t /Ta' x Zb5'Min_ '; Ix,' TO j \R/N1 `$'GONG.WALK IN-r S L1 w/ a p11ftL`Y P 5. E se pp fAVEMEI•r ? % 5-LANE SECTIONS P . - " n' , Z 8 "--------i. -C:4 `1 TAEC DGWN /- •/ • R/ 1 S �TM iOF s ra 8 .I. - 1 IIIIII LWIIIIRIII■ III IIIiIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIrIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIrrrrlltlrlrlllrlIIIIIIIIIIIMIIIIIIIVAIIIlrrrllIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIINIM IIIIIIIIIIIII;rrrrrr rr • — — �� —.. — �OOn/- __ -_._ A s��• , . ■IIIIII I hIIIIIII■ IIIIIrrrrrrI IIIIIIII rrrrrl1IIrrrrrrrrrrrrllllllllrlirrrrlltlrrrrrrrrrlrr�Irrrrrrl III'\kl plIIIIIIIIIIuIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIiUIiIIIIIIIIilrrr1HllrrrrIIIIIIII L� . 0 -- ° -- -- 7 0 afar �w In 01 if-LANES E.L-riou To Ctrs 17�� V IrT a`GONG. R/W 5O111H PROP f( LINE. - . NAUC I I DP VIC'rOCL4 HILLS .44 i _ TYPIG4L �•. • . h 4-LANE sEL-rtc 4 43' _ !2' , /2' S E901,1ElvT 54sNT —8 8 Z3' 't s' , z9' - (47' WAY 1JIPT .) i' . � ems. AREA TV pEVE1DP BY J '' F C IT`t U4HTS APT. -TyPiGiu- VIGT021.4 HILLS 4— LANs 1�C-CIO $-1.�kNE Si6GY1bh1. • : � RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT cN.' 'i ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET * q °, * �e 9y�L REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: q P �) nw �u,\ J DATE CIRCULATED: July 20, 1989 COMMENTS DUE: August 2 , 198lls ECF-087-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA; ECF-087-89 40 PROPONENT: North Bay Development Corporation/Melvin Easter, Johnson Braund Design Group. PROJECT TITLE: City Lights Apartments BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 70 unit apartment complex to be located on a vacant 3 .3 acre R3-zoned parcel. (Note: Density level has been adjusted for greenbelt on-site. ) LOCATION: East side of Benson Road between Puget Drive and south 26th Street across from Victoria Hills apartment . complex. SITE AREA: 3 . 31 acres BUILDING AREA (gross) : 49, 656 square feet total (23, 040 square feet ground floor area) . IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° ° 2 . Air ° ° 3 . Water ° ° 4. Plants ° ° 5. Animals ° ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° ° 7. Environmental Health ° ° 8. Land & Shoreline Use ° ° ° ° 9. Housing - ° 10. Aesthetics ° ° 11. Light & Glare ° ° 12 . Recreation ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° ° ° 14 . Transportation ° ° 15. Public Services ° 16. Utilities - ° COMMENTS:Aewr p c —e,-.,- / ,ze" o7,->„4.--d---- ._.____.,c_. A.e-e--., >k-„,___ ---i—ez—e., :-g2.---- 7-d...02____ -�/)Z--e �` Gi We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those a eas in which we ha ex ertise and have identified areas of probable impact or ;areas where addition information is needed to properly assess this proposal. ___ 47 Signature of Director or Au orized Representative Dat Rev. 6/88, :sJ v � RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-087-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA; ECF-087-89 PROPONENT: North Bay Development Corporation/Melvin Easter, Johnson 'Braund Design Group. PROJECT TITLE: City Lights Apartments. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 70 unit apartment complex to be located on a vacant 3 . 3 acre R-3-zoned parcel. (Note: Density level has been adjusted for greenbelt on-site. ) LOCATION: East side of Benson Road between Puget Drive and South 26th Street. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: •- COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON AUGUST 2, 1989. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: tgaorp_sis3\e_ APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED P c7(2:671 DATE / SIGNATURE OF DIRECTO OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET �- d ��-rt REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: , , 1P\--a,,.Th,�o ,� 2�' DATE CIRCULATED: July 20, 1989 COMMENTS DUE: Augus4 ` ?'s - k ECF-087-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA; ECF-087-89 ® PROPONENT: North Bay Development Corporation/Melvin Easter, Johnson Braund Design Group. PROJECT TITLE: City Lights Apartments BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 70 unit apartment complex to be located on a vacant 3 . 3 acre R3-zoned parcel. (Note: Density level has been adjusted for greenbelt on-site. ) LOCATION: East side of Benson Road between Puget Drive and south 26th Street across from Victoria Hills apartment , complex. SITE AREA: 3 .31 acres BUILDING AREA (gross) : 49,656 square feet total (23 , 040 square feet ground floor area) . IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° 2 . Air 0 ° 3 . Water ° o 0 4 . Plants ° ° 5. Animals ° 0 0 O ° 0 6. Energy & Natural Resources 0 ° o ° ° 7. Environmental Health 0 ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° 9. Housing ° o ° ° 10. Aesthetics 0 ° ° 0 ° 11. Light & Glare ° 12 . Recreation ° O ° 0 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° o 0 ° 14 . Transportation 0 ° 15. Public Services 0 ° 0 16. Utilities 0 ° COMMENTS: l l R 0013 HAS.. 13 Qp ru6 OrJ jm ►ikx, e t $4I k r tooKt, Too, .00 �4 Imo, G�t�P�i4cR�Otile� � ��7 co loot. Too I+IG Ol NICE .D itAtA)s Vv!0 I LLA STRicci 6e M 1 3(14 As t5 Woy. luo: 120(* Oi1J o5 Ag.x, cow R/oc1 c4 g : Ai+i) , swiost st(AYetk, tpMtitieloy We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. ""fli6vIri 6.°/‘.P1 Signature of rector or Authorized Representative Date Rev. 6/88 , . • ,• , • . • '• • • • . • „ - •,• , c• • , ' • -••• ' °(•,. - • a • •“. • • • • -4 " •° . • • '• • V A • • . 'V . .„ •• e • • . • r• 4 . .' ' • • RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-087-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA; ECF-087-89 PROPONENT: North Bay Development Corporation/Melvin " . ' Easter, Johnson Braund Design Group; PROJECT TITLE: City Lights Apartments. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 70 unit apartment complex to be located on a vacant 3 .3 acre 3-zoned 'parcel. (Note: Density level has been adjusted for 'greenbelt on-site. ) LOCATION: .{a : , East side of Benson Road between Puget -Drive and South26th Street. r ' TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU • POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: •- COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON AUGUST 2, 1989. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: 1:21_,ANOM0 Q14. C4) i APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED PrktSV.A04110$4 rtnorromP4 _-them or%) sly Sl4rli .c re Rxcitia. ,o AOQrTio' CON)IPEr200 MOM RA4111)co S4+out.+, !be 00N6 AV THE h1oiGTN SOvTJ-4 `Now, rot.. 1 pJ'1i&WAL FIZJ/Vt'p op, PrdoesTRI41J VJ AsV KW g Stio U G0N ivsc " •T'� llsl 106wie‘l. 14N 1S W RANO o o COYI ♦ I . �R � T�� - DRIEw AI Co R.ROCS G- C AS 5% OIN `rt. SIX WO GAO 011M E G as ApPRovis4L. FRowt BOA tc) cF bissopc.holigle TO *0104 v Ncrl O 1O Yv►►), 5/ WID111 PIIZ,tia, Coo-11; Lrxen Cote c pruwt< 316,N To APPRove. .. DATE SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORI RESENTATIVE 0W, REV. 6/88 ;" k• " V. • • • " • .. c • • * • 4.e e • . • . • * " • . • • , . . . I • • • ) „ . C •, . • • • ' • • • • • • 172 S % 7.1414/nPrYlla • . • • • . . (1.XVICIP11051C1L cl9Nivrava • • sbityrAr) 1 (r) ciNnov4 scrwl0N>y/.., 07)(\i" lbfla)n • • 9ntp,s OA 1 2i.1.SCeel (11S'YIV(Ails OnrAtittfulAa)al e • nowtti- 9- H.110-1 scisiNfala acc, cnnofiS •Q RENTON COMMUNITY. DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT onli ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET VO. %,A A. i REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ;l.A, ��� v ��c9 8 DATE CIRCULATED: July 20, 1989 COMMENTS DUE: August 2, l9 P. ro® • ECF-087-89 APPLICATION NO(S)': SA; ECF-087-89 PROPONENT: North Bay Development Corporation/Melvin Easter, Johnson Braund Design Group. PROJECT TITLE: City Lights Apartments BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 70 unit apartment complex to. be- located on a vacant 3 . 3 acre R3-zoned parcel. (Note: Density level has been adjusted for greenbelt on-site. ) LOCATION: East side of Benson Road between Puget Drive and south 26th Street across from Victoria Hills apartment , complex. SITE AREA: 3 . 31 acres BUILDING AREA (gross) : 49, 656 square feet total • (23 , 040 square feet ground floor area) . • IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth - ° ° 2 . Air ° ° 3 . Water ° o ° ° 4 . Plants ° ° ° 5. Animals ° o ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° ° ° 7 . Environmental Health ° ° ° ° 8. Land & Shoreline Use ° 9. Housing 7 ° o ° ° 10. Aesthetics ° ° o ° ° 11. Light & Glare ° ° 12 . Recreation ° °- ° - ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° ° ° 14 . Transportation ° o ° 15. Public Services ° 16. Utilities ° • COMMENTS: • We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have ,identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional informati n is needed to properly assess this proposal. 6.-- 7—,)- 9fv7 ______(/,„—,-, _ -/.,_ Sign tide of Director or / uthorized Representative Date Rev. 6/88 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-087-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA; ECF-087-89 PROPONENT: North Bay Development Corporation/Melvin Easter, Johnson Braund Design Group. PROJECT TITLE: City Lights Apartments. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 70 unit apartment complex to be located on a vacant 3 .3 acre R-3-zoned parcel. (Note: Density level has been adjusted for greenbelt on-site. ) LOCATION: East side of Benson Road between Puget Drive and South 26th Street. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: - COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON AUGUST 2, 1989. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: B€- APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS X NOT APPROVED 110 IFock et- ) j/ i w Au-S AA,q PJo 2 a o F-aoe a Ai 'per /.v 6 S. p\jb J� t l C,1) ��u 6 Ca , L,L C DATE 7— ç/ ? SIGNATURE • ' LECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/8 8 i . • RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 44, ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHE °P„4 4 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: . DATE CIRCULATED: July 20, 1989 COMMENTS DUE: August 2, 4j ECF-087-89 APPLICATION NO(S). : SA; ECF-087-89 JUL 2 6 II' PROPONENT: North Bay Development Corporation/Melvin Easter, Johnson Braund Design Group. PROJECT TITLE: City Lights Apartments BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 70 unit apartment complex to 'be located on a vacant 3 . 3 acre R3-zoned parcel. (Note: Density level has been adjusted for greenbelt on-site. ) LOCATION: East side of Benson Road between- Puget Drive and south 26th Street across-from Victoria Hills apartment • . complex. SITE AREA: 3 .31 acres BUILDING ,AREA (gross) : 49, 656 square feet total (23, 040 square feet ground floor area) . IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT , NECESSARY 1. Earth ° o ° ° 2 . Air ° o , 0 ° 3 . Water ° ° 0 ° ° 4 . Plants ° . ° 5. Animals ' ° o 0 ° --_ - 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° o ° ° • 7 . Environmental Health " ° O ° 0 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° O 0 0 - - - • 9. Housing ° ° ° - 10. Aesthetics ° O 0 0 11. Light & Glare 0 0 ° o ° ° 12 . Recreation ° O 0 ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° o /° ° 14 . Transportation • V ° o ° ° 15. Public Services ° 0 o ° 0 16. Utilities ° COMMENTS: 4O,OtOY&I Sa GGt f0 71 v �D how�fl Co, A, v1ls • I. ne app/iC4 /otr r it Q TT.d(it rnastconftai its Arfih4 Aai1� 2 4�'roP0-51 sotNe- �f?e' iaj to /I tl( / their imp4eI n 1� mftt�ns�4ti M W Amon A f SE.I/s) th 44114 fl ,,d fOir4 si •n4/at 1A4f /ve4fto/1 ,' S. Aicdei1 tfr- side Di rfenson144 14" a ccor el e. wi� o Q cached a �� / n �, Acted* 8 0� �aG�and le'of /,lf�J ettimge�tfalon 44 frr�f -ore rk%/ eXti ler& . Pa ticI ete OWL/ril rn Ae-i oIon of. Otte sffied' /Jq kil n oK lofHtK�on Amp(' 6, a er rwitNA ej ° We have reviewed this atplication with particular attention to thosda areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or u't�""'� areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this - pr. .o •al. p . .� - . 1 .. f i '< ' 0 492,--Vt. s /4/8 7 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Da e- • Rev. 6/.8 8 1, RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-087-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA; ECF-087-89 PROPONENT: North Bay Development Corporation/Melvin Easter, Johnson Braund Design Group. PROJECT TITLE: City Lights Apartments. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 70 unit apartment complex to be located on a vacant 3 .3 acre R-3-zoned parcel. (Note: Density level has been adjusted for greenbelt on-site. ) LOCATION: East side of Benson Road between Puget Drive and South 26th Street. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: •- COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON AUGUST 2, 1989. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: 71;:ins�orfafon . er vle losion APPROVEDl APPROVED/ WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED A IG itidn7 Per Alin a 7iJ (nze mitg*ton?1Q6�ea 4h rA4 Aef&lb,) 2. ,ern & e so �easa res to mt fi 47 e r- 46i one /n echo-P e j rm�0 , tl �s � n o� oal c Si- 31s�St anet ne i for .s& na at YiQ� L oca4o Ralson � � ! � n a. WiLn. Aar- sat of Denson Adel in ee e'rd-and wrA Yio aritieljOidit, #. ,Dej.i cafe 8 V if)Dui and 12 0,' u tt/, e e mend ale tit. 1A4 frt nil- o 7 l p pm" 3 l`ari-et- afe- monea.P !nqii con_diilrtc on oflie stireefi- p?a on Ae., 1 o OS� Te- .S!I e( (Ten D 4 PPs n4) i;unaler rdtAd i4eir- aid( fiis 7 torus thctef" j7eir- d ryve,W 4j rh etz4otiance col ` Cal -§fang ri (-See eorrec'onc onibe- 4etits J J . ZletAel_ 4 £21ñ?L - DATE . g /.0 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 • ti ,4 CITY OF RENTON 'ogi, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Traffic Engineering Division August 16, 1989 Mr. John Miller President, North Bay ' 633 North Mildred, Suite g Tacoma,WA 98406 RE: CITY LIGHTS APARTMENTS 2500• Block of Benson Road ECF; - 087 - 89 Dear Mr. Miller: I would like to take this moment to reemphasize the position of the Transportation Services Division concerning your project and any new development that has an impact concerning the intersection of Benson Road & SE 31st Street. This intersection presently warrants a traffic signal to alleviate the congestion and delay that the public is experiencing. Any new development utilizing this intersection will have a ' negative impact upon the environment unless ' measures are taken to change these conditions. The options that are open as the City sees them are to approve but delay new development until the City can fund, a new signal, or new development could contribute a reasonable fee towards the construction of the required signal. Following our meeting of August , 7, 1989, I conducted an estimate of the construction costs to design and build a traffic signal at the intersection of Benson Road & SE 31st Street. If you find the expenses listed on the attached estimate to ' be in line with your own experience in' construction, then this estimate could be agreed upon to serve as the basis for any SEPA traffic mitigation measures for your project. I think a reasonable traffic mitigation fee could be tied to the percentage of new PM peak traffic versus total existing PM peak traffic that enters the intersection would represent the amount of mitigation required by the City. The cost. of the new signal according to my estimate would be $114,352 and to use Benson Place Apartments as an example, along 'with the ''information supplied by the study conducted by The Transpo Group, Inc. , the mitigation fee would be: Benson Place Apt. PM Peak 14 vehicles Existing Traffic PM Peak 1028 vehicles 14 / 1028 = 1.36% of $114,352 or $1557.32 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2620 Facsimile (206) 235-2513 Mr. John Miller August 16, 1989 page 2 This percentage is slightly higher than the study by Transpo, but provides the city with a constant to check every new project (ie. 1028 existing vehicles) . These funds would be initially used towards the design of the signal (Phase I) , when sufficient funds are collected, and then subsequent development would be used to pay for the construction of the signal (Phase II) . As in all mitigation fees, if the public cannot spend the funds towards this agreed upon project within a five-year period, then the funds would be returned to the developer. If you find the information proposed in this letter to your understanding, then please signify by writing to Ms. Lenora Blauman, Current Planning Division, with your proposed mitigation fee. As in all new development, if you can find some other means of not having an impact on the above mentioned intersection, we are ready to review any proposal you might have. Respectfully, Richard H. Nordon Ass't Transportation Planning Engr. Attachment cc: Gary Norris, Trans. Systems Manager Clint Morgan, Traffic Specialist ..•Lenora Blauman, Senior Planner John Nason John Nason Architect Benson Road & SE 31st Street File INTERSECTION SIGNALIZATION ESTIMATE for Benson Road & SE 31st Street 1. Saw Cutting 545 if $7,538 2. Trenching & Backfill 1415 if $6,562 3. Intersection Patching 16 tons $900 4. Conduit (all Sizes) 4145 if $10, 656 5. Wire (all sizes) 5,378 if $2,440 6. Intersection Lighting 9 loc. $15,938 System 7. Vehicle Detectors 15 loops $11,099 8. Pedestrian Crossing . 4 loc. $6,285 System 9. Signal Heads & 8 heads $8,688 Installation 10. Traf. Sig. Poles & 3 ea. $10, 625 Installation 11. Opticom System 1 ea. $4,480 12. Traffic Sig. Controller, 1 ea. $10,925 Cabinet & Install. 13 . Pavement Markings lump sum $7,538 14. Traffic Control lump sum $1,000 SUBTOTAL $98, 156 16.5% Enar. & Inspection $16, 196 TOTAL $114,352 All the prices from above were derived from bids received on the December 2, 1987 bid opening on the SW Sunset Blvd. project with an increase of approximately 4.5% to reflect inflation. M47CN ID qcI TIN4 If , 'wipe -rda4DWAY �be OAF fysvEMENr 5'CONC kbWC 220'min. r / /AV ` ' 1Hlunn' r uliuui uw u m wtu uw nnl unu nnu fana uuu �allun ■�ul -� WJJA ��' LV, l �{u �ilLL �� � yjLi �u101111tjjj11l1n�tIjJ111illll WLL tjuilllltly1jjlllill(�jjtlllll(+jjjnitll�ullI moo, �, —� — — — -1 r, — —`- 111111111i�l111111rr 111111nM111n1IMt2111111�RUS ll� nlllTImllt11alThi11111Tminllll_lln11Ml111nnt1i111111fn1T/u111��i111t�_111111_t11n1��1t111�I11fi R11 ■luuulul' I as•ft --,l73' ✓ ; ua5 thin \ . - ll \ ?37' TOt :. IRAJ .5'CONG•WALK1NTF.SECf W CJtIS4rN4 meet P . S. EDirl'Gi fAVEMF.JLT > Q S-LANE SECTIONS 8 . . -= = =1---C4 _i .= 7 `,' TAPES DOWN VW. S'LDNC. E7cCSTl I - .1111111111111 --' -- )7 ' / 6-7 _ TO 4-LANES —8; n UALI: w ' llin�i�11111111111 EMS 111111111111IluIIIOSIESIl,llo91i.i.uluuiililuuuell.il■ ■itlltnllnnlnniIiilll.it nlnuluulnulil.uuulnn.nlll.inllnliuOni.iunuuliill.11lnllllllnnlnllll ii r • ESESESIUSissismsssi ■11(tinlnnDnnlinl niiiaii inllnulnuiulnliillnnninnlill/ililOnlnui1 ■11 M'nlllllllllllnllilllillullnllinl/llllllilill/lll/llllll/lnl[lllllnt \ 7 Pn - W 171P NES SAL?/DM TD ' ., A4sr oNt 01 a'MC. PROPEi'IY LINE - WALK I ICTb 4 HILLS .44 Oar TYPICAL- h 4-LANE Sr1-riot{ ; - 3d' I 3` , 0.4 MEivT E45 j�-� --B B-- .. 23/ . a , S' ' vs 1 (47' WAY JJ«Tr1J z9 ' rzcz222:*2z:4'44 ' ' 1 CITY UbHTS API. '1Y?1LA L ; 't' 4L vlcT( L4 HILLS 4- LANs SSCI 1O� S.-tANE 5ecnol4 - % - _, RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET �� arli, " a �� C �� REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: a It cXe a 6� .? boy% DATE CIRCULATED: July 20, 1989 COMMENTS DUE: August 19 ECF-087-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA; ECF-087-89 - PROPONENT: North Bay Development Corporation/Melvin Easter, Johnson Braund Design Group. PROJECT TITLE: City Lights Apartments BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 70 unit apartment complex to be located on a vacant 3 .3 acre R3-zoned parcel. (Note: Density level has been adjusted for greenbelt on-site. ) LOCATION: East side of Benson Road between Puget Drive and south 26th Street across from Victoria Hills apartment . complex. SITE AREA: 3 . 31 acres BUILDING AREA (gross).: 49, 656 square feet total (23 , 040 square feet ground floor area) . IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° o ° ° 2 . Air ° o ° ° 3 . Water ° o ° - ° 4 . Plants ° o ° ° 5. Animals ° O ° ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° ° ° ° 7 . Environmental Health ° ° o ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° O ° ° 9. Housing ° ° o ° ° 10.. Aesthetics ° o ° ° 11. Light & Glare ° o ° ° 1 12 . Recreation ° • - - - ° ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° ° 0 ° 14 . Transportation ° ° ° 15. Public Services ° ° o ° ° 16. Utilities ° I COMMENTS: poAs m a jir..._. .0 t I w c,- r-a— ---�-4 34'1' tea-44--- R---°—'-`--(Q e6-1-- l- V-7 ct—e—,-e- (et-14._ ec,..,,,,_,,,L,L.L.A.4.....:c. ,..1„ p --` r ,-- 1 71,2_ „;,,,,_74,,,,F7 We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. (AS .' 7 z4/?7 Signat of Director or Authddized Representative Dat f Rev. 6/88 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-087-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA; ECF-087-89 PROPONENT: North Bay Development Corporation/Melvin Easter, Johnson Braund Design Group. PROJECT TITLE: City Lights Apartments. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for 70 unit apartment complex to be located on a vacant 3.3 acre R-3-zoned parcel. (Note: Density level has been adjusted for greenbelt on-site. ) LOCATION: East side of Benson Road between Puget Drive and South 26th Street. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: •- COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON AUGUST 2, 1989. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ✓ NOT APPROVEDIJJD.,2s2 • qt. c L3 ,A DATE Z SIGNATURE Wr DIRECTOR OR AU RIZED REPRESENTATIVE //7 REV. 6/88 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 44 ‘4, 4, ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET 'io • <,49 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: StOrL,n LI.A. Jr.- Nip. 40 DATE CIRCULATED: July 20, 1989 COMMENTS DUE: August 2, 1989. ECF-087-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA; ECF-087-89 PROPONENT: North Bay Development Corporation/Melvin Easter, Johnson Braund Design Group. PROJECT TITLE: City Lights Apartments BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 70 unit apartment complex to be located on a vacant 3.3 acre R3-zoned parcel. (Note: Density level has been adjusted for greenbelt on-site. ) LOCATION: East side of Benson Road between Puget Drive and south 26th Street across from Victoria Hills apartment complex. SITE AREA: 3 . 31 acres BUILDING AREA (gross) : 49, 656 square feet total (23, 040 square feet ground floor area) . IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° ° . . 2 . Air - ° ° . 3 . Water ° 1 ° ° o 0 ° 4. Plants ° ° . 5. Animals ° 0 . . . 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° . . . 7. Environmental Health ° ° . ° 0 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° ° . 0 . 9. Housing ° ° . 10. Aesthetics ° ° . 11. Light & Glare ° . ° . ° 12. Recreation 0 ° . . . . 13. Historic & Cultural Preservation ° . ° 14 . Transportation . . 15. Public Services ° . . . . 16. Utilities ° . COMMENTS: 5�ee a Jly/G/ec/ - We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. - 5?- f) 7-). ear7 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Da V Rev. 6/88 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-087-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA; ECF-087-89 PROPONENT: North Bay Development Corporation/Melvin Easter, Johnson Braund Design Group. PROJECT TITLE: City Lights Apartments. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 70 unit apartment complex to be located on a vacant 3 .3 acre R-3-zoned parcel. (Note: Density level has been adjusted for greenbelt on-site. ) LOCATION: East side of Benson Road between Puget Drive and South 26th Street. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ' ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING .DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: • +o W a COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON AUGUST 2, 1989. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: J-Ong 030A-2r APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS V NOT APPROVED (S•e6 rev iO S / L DATE WY SIGNATURE OF D REC 0 0 AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE I T R R REV. 6/88 CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: August 4, 1989 TO: Lenore Blauman, Senior Planner FROM: Garth Cray, Storm Water Utility Engineering-y,/X SUBJECT: City Lights Environmental Review The following are comments on the aforementioned Environmental Review: 1) Open drainage channel needs to be left open unless it is shown that such channel presents an erosion problem. 2) A temporary erosioin control plan needs to be provided and work will be performed within a May 1st through September 1st construction window. 3) Detention system should be located outside of the roadway easement. 4) Detention will be based upon a 25-year storm with a 5-year release rate. Existing detention will need to be accounted for in design. 5) A baffled oil/water separator will,be required. A biofiltration swale should be incorporated into the design. ER-CTYLT/GDC:lf L:. 1. RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: trThca. 3C-1A- DATE CIRCULATED: July 20, 1989 COMMENTS DUE: August 2, 1989 ECF-087-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA; ECF-087-89 PROPONENT: North Bay Development Corporation/Melvin Easter, Johnson Braund Design Group. PROJECT TITLE: City Lights Apartments BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 70 unit apartment complex to be located on a vacant 3.3 acre R3-zoned parcel. (Note: Density level has been adjusted for greenbelt on-site. ) LOCATION: East side of Benson Road between Puget Drive and south 26th Street across from Victoria Hills apartment . complex. SITE AREA: 3.31 acres BUILDING AREA (gross) : 49, 656 square feet total (23, 040 square feet ground floor area) . IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° ° ° 2 . Air ° ° 0 0 3 . Water ° x, o ° ° 4 . Plants ° o ° ° 5. Animals ° 0 0 o ° ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° o ° ° 7. Environmental Health ° o 0 0 8 . Land & Shoreline Use 00 ° O 0 ° 9. Housing 0 0 ° . . ° 10. Aesthetics 0 0 ° o ° 0 11. Light & Glare ° o ° ° 12 . Recreation ° ° 0 o 0 ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° ° O 0 ° 14. Transportation 0x ° o ° ° 15. Public Services 0 ° o ° 0 16. Utilities ° 0 00MMENTS:----Ti4iNi?D `/ �{t l0 a d&17' ¢.sr�• z4i&i 2DL �rb.v l,c�6w ri66.1.... Wira—was KzeLl -t ,eql ,-12+6ct b 'i 8% Czgio.. r�— j 4t iv..� �Ut -t&r Lcir i w - 0.e.vr4G- � e�-1. OTVrlaap Al2.1. 7a ,Og. — rou, CDF r 1Itk 2 r7 641 We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. uy lizberk Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Dat Rev. 6/88 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-087-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA; ECF-087-89 PROPONENT: North Bay Development Corporation/Melvin Easter, Johnson Braund Design Group. PROJECT TITLE: City Lights Apartments. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 70 unit apartment complex to be located on a vacant 3 .3 acre R-3-zoned. parcel. (Note: Density level has been adjusted for greenbelt on-site. ) LOCATION: East side of Benson Road between Puget Drive and South 26th Street. , TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION. DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON AUGUST 2, 1989. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: -7/,/.1 ¢_lZ.(/(1,-- APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ,C NOT APPROVED . DATE eg SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 'P A' 4 ' RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 00) '4 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ✓lid ��9 ,,�'4soti REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: (,,,��1;�e� Erk, �7'98 9 DATE CIRCULATED: July 20, 1989 COMMENTS DUE: August 2, 19 � ECF-087-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA; ECF-087-89 PROPONENT: North Bay Development Corporation/Melvin Easter, Johnson Braund Design Group. PROJECT TITLE: City Lights Apartments BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 70 unit apartment complex to be located on a vacant 3 .3 acre R3-zoned parcel. (Note: Density level has been adjusted for greenbelt on-site. ) LOCATION: East side of Benson Road between Puget Drive and south 26th Street across from Victoria Hills apartment complex. SITE AREA: 3 .31 acres BUILDING AREA (gross) : 49,656 square feet total (23, 040 square feet ground floor area) . IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° e ° ° 2 . Air ° ° - 3 . Water ° e ° . 4 . Plants ° . 0 ° 5. Animals ° ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° . ° ° 7. Environmental Health ° . . . 8. Land & Shoreline Use ° O ° ° 9. Housing ° . 10. Aesthetics ° o ° 0 11. Light & Glare _ : 12 . Recreation ° O 0 . 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° ° 14 . Transportation ° ° ° ° 15. Public Services ° 16. Utilities ° COMMENTS: - C)651 & SRWOAn.`f S6Wt(Z. l E. fotQ ME9 mEiScu SCttoOL. Tiu r St PQC-UgWrep _ - gefiX6t5, W' e(214 r4 6XTEN510)4 t S&Uue+t . priE NSicso _ RCQuirte 'INAIAN frAL fl ,ov€ bx i g*',ii o u s PE2 G+TY s '$'trtNoArz ,& v-0 rL A)Ev6 Looefts GxZEKS►6u . �a Vami12E '(j,E(.EIY3E o� GAS6'ttEnr►S IS(' City( Go ow4Gi L44'tf?ou;apt', ; -t c wworia i . g� �` 'PRocEouQES We have reviewed this application with particular attention to thos- areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. . h =' ia�i 7 2ei — 8G� i Signature of Director or Auticrized Representative Date Rev. 6/88 • RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-087-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA; ECF-087-89 PROPONENT: North Bay Development Corporation/Melvin Easter, Johnson Braund Design Group. PROJECT TITLE: City Lights Apartments. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 70 unit apartment complex to be located on a vacant 3 . 3 acre R-3-zoned parcel. (Note: Density level has been adjusted for greenbelt on-site. ) LOCATION: East side of Benson Road between Puget Drive and South 26th Street. TO: ' PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: - COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON AUGUST 2, 1989. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: i)r/L,TV „g//6-INJE.E.e/AI0, APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED UTILITY APPROVAL SUBJECT TO eta gr7. -- 7 LATE COMERS AGREEMENT-WATER AZ!) LATE COMERS AGREEMENT-SEVYER /1p • SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-WATER )/ES sg(�S.°D XTD n eta :Its /a .LSD.o 0 SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-SEWER s.-x 2D i t=*I,2,41. 0.So SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE-WATER 4•/0 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE-SEWER ti/D APPROVED WATER PLAN QEa .ite s6QAtAIE wAI Q. ' AI.) APPROVED SEWER PLAN 9.EQuiL )AttAfe SEweft, 'PIA r1 APPROVED FIRE HYDRANT mom (E.5 BY FIRE DER V ."Ea r'.7 ANALYSIS mkt( RE ILectui a E9 Eyirs- 1N� 3•MiTMt( StW UuE t u '?) 2EleCAiED • bv6 tE6cuiQe ?ue\-*15 virn, '9%uecoPEe5 6VTEN'S). M- E)cISA u1U-ies 9E'¢- toU 126 W'C0�1 s k n10 MR.OS• 1 i Q1 �. / c,/l./ DATE - 2 / -- d SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR .UTHORIZED rPESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 ; - /Zql. c; okt R. ,pq • RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT cd; ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ' ok 4 s v q 7 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: li&c� *r4k,.. 1989 DATE CIRCULATED: July 20, 1989 COMMENTS DUE: August 2, 19��� ECF-087-89 APPLICATION. NO(S) : SA; ECF-087-89 PROPONENT: North Bay Development Corporation/Melvin Easter, Johnson Braund Design Group. PROJECT TITLE: City Lights Apartments BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 70 unit apartment complex to be located on a vacant 3 .3 acre R3-zoned parcel. (Note: Density level has been adjusted for greenbelt on-site. ) LOCATION: East side of Benson Road between Puget Drive and south 26th Street across from Victoria Hills apartment complex. SITE AREA: 3 .31 acres BUILDING AREA (gross) : 49, 656 square feet total ' (23 , 040 square feet ground floor area) . IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° o ° ° 2 . Air ° o ° ° 3 . Water ° o ° ° 4. Plants ° o ° ° 5. Animals ° • . ° o ° ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° ° o ° ° 7. Environmental Health ° ° ° ° 8. Land & Shoreline Use ° o ° ° . 9. Housing ° o ° ° 10. Aesthetics ° o ° ° 11. Light & Glare ° o ° ° 12 . Recreation ° o ° ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° o ° ° 14 . Transportation ° o °/' ° 15. Public Services ° ° o ° ° 16. Utilities ° 1 COMMENTS: 'h edei 'l lotb - u ;CthOlk_ 0f 41 N� ioT._Cam / cv 041&a. MCACULic 3awe-► -t f z, Sko ukd., bo. (,l,In c*- , VI RAM (A f) WCA.L, V oL h kx oomi e-r - polk,uu. Lliaiiir9 vvuUl: VutoL 4-0 lou (-}ticsi- W LIM uk gVt V wei- . \Ida C.A.0 a-cctss is pouc wits Loud(idak . We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this pr. sal. .f Dir� ree�r or Authorized Representative Date ur 13c5/59 .Signature P - Rev. 6/88 • RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-087-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA; ECF-087-89 PROPONENT: North Bay Development Corporation/Melvin Easter, Johnson Braund Design Group. PROJECT TITLE: City Lights Apartments. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 70 unit apartment complex to be located on a vacant 3 .3 acre R-3-zoned parcel. (Note: Density level has been adjusted for greenbelt on-site. ) LOCATION: East side of Benson Road between Puget Drive and South 26th Street. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: - COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON AUGUST 2, 1989. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED ✓ APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED f AS\7AILL thov1 of' Tot Lot a/vtic, Tc d.(;c,VS, [AASI-1,ut 1, 4d i AA of Leg kfi vt w u S\-iLLv we,u.4d 6 (:11/to lj;k, t--tuy WVv i . DATE �Z.�� SIGNATURE DIR OR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT „ "•, ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW 5,1-1.EET0 u w REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: �\re- fte.)-t. 41(-57\ e ,. 4ch,,4 DATE CIRCULATED: July 20, 19.89 COMMENTS DUE: Au us .'89 j4 ECF-087-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA; ECF 087 89 4ijL'ik® PROPONENT: North Bay Development Corporation/Melvin Easter, Johnson Braund Design Group. PROJECT TITLE: City Lights Apartments BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 70 unit apartment complex to be located on a vacant 3 .3 acre R3-zoned parcel. (Note: Density level has been adjusted for greenbelt on-site. ) LOCATION: East side of Benson Road between Puget Drive and south 26th Street across from Victoria Hills apartment , complex. SITE AREA: 3 .31 acres BUILDING AREA (gross) : 49, 656 square feet total (23 , 040 square feet ground floor area) . IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° o ° ° 2. Air ° o ° ° 3 . Water 0 0 ° o ° ° 4 . Plants ° ° °' - -- ° ° 5. Animals 0 0 ° o ° ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° 7. Environmental Health ° o 0 ° 8. Land & Shoreline Use ° o ° ° 9. Housing 0 0 ° o ° ° 10. Aesthetics ° o 0 ° 11. Light & Glare ° o ° ° 12 . Recreation ° 1 ° ° ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° 0 ° o ° ° 14. Transportation ° o /" : ° 15. Public Services ° • - - -° 0 ° 16. Utilities ° COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those. areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. . 1A--04,0,4- -- ,,t 75)", Signature of Director or Authorized Representative to Rev. 6/88 4 t. • •, • • t•.1 . ••• ; •• • t 40 1•:1, • •t. • • • tt- •• • r • • • • • • • . . • . . . • RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-087-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA; ECF-087-89 PROPONENT: North Bay Development Corporation/Melvin Easter, Johnson Braund Design Group. PROJECT TITLE: City Lights Apartments. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 70 unit apartment complex to be located on a vacant 3 . 3 acre R-3-zoned parcel. (Note: Density level has been adjusted for greenbelt on-site. ) LOCATION: East side of Benson Road between Puget Drive and South 26th Street. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON AUGUST 2, 1989. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: ijy , e(a..)e.tAiv\ APPROVED '6 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED Any development and/or construction shall comply with current Fire and Building Codes and Ordi- nances. A second means of approved access is required. Fire Dartment access roads/lanes shall-be paved minimum width 20'; minimum height 13' 6", Yes._ No Preliminary fire flow calculations show a fire flow of .3, .g,cc' is required. -3 hydrants with a minimum flow of /, moo gpm each is required. Primary hydrant is required to be within /SD feet of the structure. Secondary hydrants are required to be within j3o v feet of the structure. An approved automatic sprinkler system is required to protect the total structure. Yes No._ All fire department access roads are to be paved and installed prior to construction. Yes No_ All fire hydrants are required to be installed and approved prior to construction. Yes No DATE DATE ,4 ./ /91j2 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 -41 Lii3d .C.:4R Ci iI > aMa bLo o ("Si V.4 L.;" uo”:. a r e• r:f, ro 9, .• a.; `t3q-,t • l'`,1€1: 0.P,RA pg.p..Do ! Led LA:3C1 4.0 c.4; 1,1%; JUJ LIJ Le) L53- i2 4.:ZGY.f;100 LI? FA 3CVIC! Lc; ' CAI arim Q . , • •, _ , RCQUIRFD FIR( FLOW CALCULATIONS 1. HAZARD IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION NAME Ci77 ///act%r ®7 S' U.B.C. CLASS OF BUILD ADDRESS .��:Sa'v./ /37.�re-7- _7),e. FIRE MGMT AREA 2. DETERMINE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION - CLASS (CIRCLE ONE): I - II IV III V FIRE-RESISTIVE NON-COMBUSTIBLE ORDINARY W MIXED (NOTE: IF "MIXED", SEE SPECIAL INSTRUCTION FOR AREA AND BASIC FIRE FLOW) 3. DETERMINE AREA: gjc GROUND FLOOR AREA: FT2 (A �� NUMBER OF STORIES: TOTAL BUILDING AREA: /5 Z 4 4. DETERMINE BASIC FIRE FLOW FROM TABLE 01, USING AREA (A): ,-' SDI GPM CB 5. DETERMINE OCCUPANCY FACTOR ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: )G 75— GPM CC. IF LOW HAZARD, SUBTRACT UP TO 25% OF (B): IF HIGH HAZARD1, ADD UP TO 25% OF CB) 6. COMPUTE SUB-TOTAL (B+C): (IF B+C IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) Z, /,?3--- GPM (D. 7. DETERMINE SPRINKLER ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: " J S IZ = 5 GPM (E: (IF COMPLETELY SPRINKLERED, SUBTRACT UP TO 50% OF (D): IF LIGHT HAZARD OCCUPANCY AND FIRE RESISTIVE OR NON-COMBUSTIBLE CONSTRUCTION, SUBTRACT UP TO 75% OF CD). 8. DETERMINE EXPOSURE ADJUSTMENT: USING THE TABLE AT LEFT AS A GUIDE, ENTER THE SEPARATION AND ADJUSTMENT FOR EACH OF THE "FOUR FACES" OF THE BUILDING IN THE TABLE AT THE RIGHT: SEPARATION MAX. ADJUSTMENT EXPOSURE SEPARATION ACT. ADJ. 0 - 10 25% MAX. NORTH .4 0 ' ADD /5 % 11 - 30, 20% MAX. EAST r ADD AO % • 31 - 60 15% MAX. SOUTH ADD /0 % 61 -100 10% MAX. WEST 30 ' ADD 0,74 b 101 -150 5% MAX. TOTAL % OF ADJUSTMENT 150 OR 4-HR WALL 0% MAX. (NOT TO EXCEED 75%) : 4. cb- - (TOTAL % ADJUSTMENT TIMES (D) ADJUSTMENT: 4--• 170 la e 2 S GPM (F) 9. DETERMINE ROOF AND SIDING COVERING ADJUSTMENT: CIF SHINGLE COVERING, ADD 500 GPM) ADJUSTMENT: —401—" GPM' CG) 10. COMPUTE ESTIMATED FIRE FLOW REQUIRED: CIF D+E+F+G IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) CIF D+E+F+G IS GREATER THAN 12,000 GPM, INSERT 12,000 GPM) 3 / / 7. 7-5 (D+E+F+G) REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: -3 a�5/) 6 D 0 GPM CH) • 11. SIGNED: 4- V,3TE ----/ u ae/, /9!.9 ' 6 /, ,4 03n/At/Faf y /.T1` REQUIRED FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS 1. HAZARD IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION NAME (F j v. 1/6 f S" Ael/..Sa U.B.C. CLASS OF BUILD ADDRESS e/A/SO.c/ ' 74'6. ,7,- 2)/s FIRE MGMT AREA 2. DETERMINE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION - CLASS (CIRCLE ONE): I - II IV III V FIRE-RESISTIVE NON-COMBUSTIBLE ORDINARY WOOd( 2ME MIXED (NOTE: IF "MIXED", SEE SPECIAL INSTRUCTION FOR AREA AND BASIC FIRE FLOW) 3. DETERMINE AREA: ,0,S A - GROUND FLOOR AREA: FT2 (A NUMBER OF STORIES: • TOTAL BUILDING AREA: 9 S'y.; 4. DETERMINE BASIC FIRE FLOW FROM TABLE 01, USING AREA (A): a 75/) GPM (B 5. DETERMINE OCCUPANCY FACTOR ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: — G ? 7. 5-- GPM (C. IF LOW HAZARD, SUBTRACT UP TO 25% OF (B): IF HIGH HAZARD, ADD UP TO 25% OF (B) 6. COMPUTE SUB-TOTAL (B+C): CIF B+C IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) o�O li o2. S GPM (D. 7. DETERMINE SPRINKLER ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: - ---- GPM (E. (IF COMPLETELY SPRINKLERED, SUBTRACT UP TO 50% OF CD): IF LiGHT HAZARD OCCUPANCY AND FIRE RESISTIVE OR NON-COMBUSTIBLE CONSTRUCTION, SUBTRACT UP TO 75% OF CD). 8. DETERMINE EXPOSURE ADJUSTMENT: USING THE TABLE AT LEFT AS A GUIDE, ENTER THE SEPARATION AND ADJUSTMENT FOR EACH OF THE "FOUR FACES" OF THE BUILDING IN THE TABLE AT THE RIGHT: SEPARATION MAX. ADJUSTMENT EXPOSURE SEPARATION ACT. ADJ. 0 - 10 25% MAX. NORTH 1A.5X ADD OS- % 11 - 30 20% MAX. EAST l D' ADD /5" % • 31 - 60 15% MAX. SOUTH • 7S- ADD / 1 % 61 -100 10% MAX. WEST _3D ' ADD 4c) % 101 -150 5% MAX. TOTAL % OF ADJUSTMENT 150 OR 4-HR WALL 0% MAX. (NOT TO EXCEED 75%) : � (TOTAL % ADJUSTMENT TIMES CD) ADJuS TMENT: -{- Lv 3 I • ZS GPM (F) 9. DETERMINE ROOF AND SIDING COVERING ADJUSTMENT: • (IF SHINGLE COVERING, ADD 500 GPM) ADJUSTMENT: GPM' (G) 0. COMPUTE ESTIMATED FIRE FLOW REQUIRED: _ (IF D+E+F+G IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) CIF D+E+F+G IS GREATER THAN 12,000 GPM, INSERT 12,030 GPM) ( '3. 7.5 (D+E+F+G) REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: I -?I_,CJ0 GPM (H) A. SIGNED: I ATE 6?... well. ,' /9 r l ,, JohnsonBraund , design group, inc. architecture, landscape & planning consultants PLA iM(a UIV SIGN July 25, 1989 • CITY OF RENTON IF' JUL 2 6 1989 1 Lenora Blauman, Senior Planner S "E C 11 V E ruii City of Renton Planning Department Municipal Building 200 Mill Ave. South Renton, WA 98055 Re: City Lights Apartments Our Project #88-52 Lenora: Per our telephone conversation please find, attached, a copy of the revised "Building Composition" statistics along with a copy of the former numbers for comparison. You will note that the gross floor area for buildings 1,2 and 3 has been reduced (corrected). We have also included the ground floor "garage" area for buildings 4 and 5. Should you need copies of the entire revised sheet CS, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Thank you for your time. JOHNSON BRAUND DESIGN G OUP, INC. mi,b)..\ ic;,. .oes" Melvin R. Easter, ASLA Landscape Architect MRE/sjw A85264 . cc: John Miller, Northbay Development Greg L.Allwine,AIA Melvin R.Easter,ASLA 304 Main Avenue South,Suite 200 Renton,Washington 98055 Fax 271-7202 (206) 271-7200 (206) 623-5732 (HC) : 4 (Standard) : 82 (Compact) : 37 Total Stalls Provided: 123 Covered Stalls (Carports) : 54 (Garages) : 16 BUILDING COMPOSITION: Bldgs. 1&3 6 "A-1" units, 6 "A-2" units, 6 "C" units Gross floor (living) area: 14 , 448 S .F. - Bldg. 2 6 "A-1" units, 6 "A-2" units, 6 "C" units Recreation Center Gross floor area: 15, 648 S.F. Bldgs. 4&5 8 "B" units Gross floor (living) area: 7, 632 S.F. Garage Area: 1, 911 S.F. IMPERVIOUS AREA: Bldg. &Rec.Center: 23 , 040 S.F. Parking, Drives & Walks: 41,295 S.F. TOTALS: 64 , 335 S.F. (45%) OPEN SPACE/ LANDSCAPE AREA: 79,849 S.F. (55%) Building Setbacks: Front - 30 feet Side - 12 feet Rear - 12 feet Building Height: Allowed - 50 feet Provided - Approx. 35 feet (HC) : 4 (Standard) : 82 (Compact) : 37 Total Stalls Provided: 123 Covered Stalls (Carports) : 54 (Garages) : 16 BUILDING COMPOSITION: Bldgs. 1&3 6 "A-1" units, 6 "A-2" units, 12 "C" units Gross floor (living) area: 20, 412 S.F. Bldg. 2 6 "A-1" units, 6 "A-2" units, 12. "C" units Recreation Center Gross floor area: 21, 612 S .F. Bldgs. 4&5 8 "B" units Gross floor (living) area: 7, 632 S.F. IMPERVIOUS AREA: Bldg. &Rec.Center: 23 , 040 S.F. Parking, Drives & Walks: 41,295 S.F. TOTALS: 64,335 S.F. (45%) OPEN SPACE/ LANDSCAPE AREA: 79,849 S.F. (55%) Building Setbacks: Front - 30 feet Side - 12 feet Rear - 12 feet Building Height: Allowed - 50 feet Provided - Approx. 35 feet --MEMORANDUM To 6.til Date 6 -1-61 From �� LItvG Subject OCT1 L VoH1 PIM 5, 5A - O87-67 SFt Kt w 5r6K.T0 DNI MONIOINXo 11'6 51 opu(o I1M.0I(1EO ON) - 3UIL..ol+v(�, ti6 -Our) M6 THAT T1-te 'i CITY OF RENTON "LL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Planning Division July 21, 1989 C�i Y 11L•NICN ) JUL 251989 in � Superintendent's Office ? (c; h,) C. Renton School District #403 435 Main Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 The City of Renton Community Development Department has received an application for a 70 unit apartment complex to be located on a vacant 3.3 acre R-3 zoned parcel. The property is located on the east side of Benson Road between-Puget Drive and South 26th Street. In order to process this application, the Community Development Department needs to know which Renton schools would be attended by children living in residences at the location indicated above. Would you please fill in the appropriate schools on the list below and return this letter to the Department of Community Development, Current Planning Division, City of Renton, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, Washington 98055. Elementary School: �� �,�y/+o 4Zic dZ (.% T6 Middle School: Af:E:6 High School: L/ E7(fIgi/ Will the schools you have indicated be able to handle the impact of the additional students estimated to come from the proposed development? Yes No , Any Comments: R._ c5 ;Q C D Z 89 Thank you for providing this important information C iPb/ KSb '/O3 Sincerely, Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE/MBS:mjp 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 Facsimile (206) 235-2513 . ,`;74 ,SG110�l O1 DATA SERVICES • O ; =tea ►-] I T,. �� . u ii7 t y(-) July 24 , 1989 403 ' Donald K. Erickson, ACP • Cif G;;h-, ,,.1 City of Renton r''''17‘0 Community Development Department JUL 2 5 1989 . 200 Mill Avenue South F ` Renton, WA 98055 �y � �(� (� (i ' IL, 1: • • Dear Mr . Erickson, This is in response to your request for information regarding the addition of a 70 unit apartment complex and how it will impact the Renton School District. Given the information you have provided in your letter I have indicated that our schools will NOT be able to handle the influx of new students that ,this development would add .to the district at the present time. I base ' this conclusion on a maximum impact scenario, assuming that all 70 units of the apartment complex . will be three bedroom units and that the average family residing in these apartments will have at least 2 children. Simple math gives us a total new student population of 140 4(,-,- children which equates to roughly one third the of the current population average of most of our elementary schools. Granted, not all of the. children within such. a complex would be of elementary school age, ;however, the comparison does demonstrate that the effects of such a. population surge will require additional classrooms, teachers, teachers aides, teaching .materials and bus transportation to insure that all ' of the children in the affected schools receive the same high quality of education Renton School District is committed to providing. If you could provide some additional information about this:apar.tment complex, such as : _ Number of 1 bedroom units . . Number of 2 bedroom units Number of 3 bedroom units Is this to be low-income housing? or ' Is the to be regular. commercial rate housing?. When is the expected completion date of the project? When is the expected full occupancy date projected? i Renton School Distri-.. #403 page 2 . This information would enable us to make a more precise determination of the impact to the Renton School District regarding this proposed apartment complex. Specifically, the dates of completion and occupancy would give us the ability to project into the future as to how the district would be able to plan and prepare for the new student population increase . If you require the more precise analysis, please provide the additional information at your earliest opportunity. If you have any additional questions , please do not hesitate to call . Renton School District #403 B -e J. Muckian Computer Services Supervisor ( 206 ) 235-2393 city-apt. ltr JonnsonBraunci I (-- ti. tdesign group, inc. JUL 31 architecture, landscape & planning consultants !' ' j 1989 C ii 11; { k PHONE LOG ?C, MEMO H CONFERENCE INFO -i I Distribution: i Project ' r1l- P t No. C7Z i� 1Yu�.r- X I _�- Date __ _ +__- Time � '. � IncomingCall ar Person �• �Q �- _ _-. - Outgoing Call t Viff'1417- Company a- o10_1 mph__ Phone No. 2 - ?�PZ E.He r1 (. 1140Wh 1( reiV I 'e 9 L tiv, Sit& Ocin ook- tou WWi v oft- ilt 5 Ccrt vpi/vL c 1 .) v(z-- ;a p (A � CO itr Oh � ° h ° k, -Tl ac o U, I V V . C ' i rovt I ( i C2.) nor WA-- _ Iv S � 1 1-tA ca�b r040 U � i,auvol — . I , i 5 ik ry Y-- b s PUrt-0-,r2 ,-, , n_Tip/ car .L__k, rg _v - P0/4 ,. Nvgrace____TPWV tk 0 To ArOf C241 lvi C, A %v z.) Fro ham-tt‘f2 ivt c, -, ti i 0vc 141q i YY?q. f*WH, . j _ WI-6k; Iv . ..Lxihi,R, NI lib 11 r) bWr Cfeeit- troyN p1 c Ci U \ s/w) � ) I 5 r ,' hf_ ato1. n.�tv PA. wi' Iiis� , on vestViQ1 icf-ort _ -1 (s)7h& dwaopeir ,i9 1� (4, pity 7 {-- -. LI .otlf-i'lltkoL) _ -1 Signature 304 Main Avenue South, Suite 200 Renton, Washington 98055 (206) 271-7200 (206) 623-5732 (FAX) 271-7202 i' . 2 o1Z_ JohnsonBraund dbdesign group, inc architecture, landscape & planning consultants PHONE LOG% MEMO ❑ CONFERENCE ❑ INFO ❑ Distribution: Project Project No. et5 -z . Date ' Zt�- Time Incoming Call ❑ Person Outgoing Call ❑ Company Phone No. File ❑ q:) v4'Lo ppi . )(yin I r real * Und o o t4. - oow kilts G e45 f. �� t e4.- }- ' Cl o f004 Ton W.. �.� t'rov i M troc.4\- -(4. attkly si s r thz., SeAl ' ' p ; . „i Ire c'i w ibh 1�a/1 L rti� Gib titio01q • riffArcatt fl tfb2- Vsc-*ori (t't c Nkeasl---6K Signature 304 Main Avenue South, Suite 200 Renton, Washington 98055 (206) 271-7200 (206) 623-5732 (FAX) 271-7202 db JohnsonBraund ; ��` f `� ' fi , E v�i t fa Mdesign group, Inc. • col Ot a� JUL 311g89 '' City of Renton Attn: Lenora Bluaman Planning Department Municipal Building 200 Mill Ave. South Renton, WA 98055 ' 04 Main Avenue South, Suite 200 Renton, Washington 98055 :-,s: t � \+ ir\ 1, ' . f--r NOTICE OF PENDING SITE PLAN APPROVAL RENTON, WASHINGTON A Site Plan Application has been filed and accepted with the Planning Division of the Community Development Department. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. DESCRIPTION: CITY LIGHTS APARTMENTS ECF; SA-087-89 Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 70 unit apartment complex to be located on a vacant 3.3 acre R-3, Residential Multi-Family, zoned parcel. (Note: Density level has • been adjusted for greenbelt on-site.) GENERAL LOCATION: East side of Benson Road between Puget Drive and South 26th Street. PUBLIC APPROVALS: o Environmental Review o Site Plan Approval o Building Permit Approval The application can be reviewed at the Planning Division located on the third floor of • Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval. For further information on the application or dates of final action by the City, please contact the Planning Division at 235-2550. • • WINO OLIN II- J _1 r__-.==______- 1. 1 i '�� r' _ NIL1nr JO,.NION i ILIY SCHOOL �� . SCHOOL 1 1 ��1 _, _________-__:::__.,__________A_ j 11 \ 3V V __ I rlw.^ 7 MA I ,, ____ a �j---, I rAwwk.IG i - -3 ° ,/ PROJECT SITE// ic::::- - ) ! � IANCNOIC//// // / 4 CI _ - a. 1 11 _ N r �/ , ' 1 ry_ !Qr• , YIC7A►wNTfLLMff DNS r. - J _7 I- au 2-- • • 1 .<\A-j ? I ,..•( • . '' _..1 . ,• i- . = i . . .. . . . . ' . . .0 .„ . . . . . . . •- . J __--- __.----- . _-- ./ • - . ., . . '• ' \ 1 1 7'••,// ". : t. l. 1 , , ' W• AT8R MIGI4r0F4,041•-- \ t 7. I A , , , ,, :- ; ( ) I 14 i Or Pr II -t°• ii. I , :.318.018' I •2 ...*7 \-----' \ 1:60 \ \ i / ' ) I 111.. •\ ... .- -,:----------. • • ,:•::.ty. \ \\ ,' i , . , ., . . .„ • r ./.. ,, ; 0 , io,., . e :jilt 22% s,,e .0 • 0' .14 r. 0 , 0 • ' , . ,' . t.-Y . \lbOr'' \. 7. ; 0 • :• 7 7 t , • \ 1 I' • 1 i 4.;'' - /)I 8110glit 01' I, .6 . 1 4 • % - • • ,,•• i:. • ' ' 9' • ' , C 11 t• J, \44 1 4,, ! ' 1• 96114t,- •G . ® : t••• c'Q%: o C' • i • : ( '‘,' . o (1, . ' ;° ; -e--, . I . ' ‘s ' ii , • • \ • 1: • . • \ r, • , b 00 (.1°P 11,® . is 0 • : Fi_ • \ '., 11 !ii\l• Pi p It, lia ,,0 1 0 , , • 18 0 0 U* 14 ii`, \ ' 0 is. ) • 1\' ,‘ ., • •.44401 - , it (/- I fit ::7 01010 . • 1 4` (0' '. ‘..\ ' ! i I 0001 i0 . 8 0. I 7 ' .\8; ,} \ i \..,.\ 2 .Ei 0 ° . • o 00 I • 06' ' , • 1 \ ' i•3>Ipla' —--ca•• . ". ''.•'..i4aC'"iFG)1:1.' 6Uf0RQ a11an?I. \\ \ \ .,,\I: . --• —....7-.,-1-1(- ;oott••l s f' 0 0 \" • 4V1 ,• i I,l1 f./r1,.,.Z0171 1, ,{ i0' 0 ' \ •0,. I1i,1•' • \\.(4.\ ,,. .\\ _. .__---_ 0 6,4 _ . %t. --, ' : • , t • - ' ----fii,o_i. •., . I ' i i nip xcf.t‘r \ ii, , ' .. i; 0 0 V -o . 8 md •-, ' - . I 1 A 3 d 1 \ . . . , 3 o 1 -0- • "b' ' I cOg s 0 ra-71,.',.-- • ----•, ! r- f; 22 \ 1 , \ 1 . II \op • ir•-i..,,,. , yo,„ 0 , • • e \ \ '' • Illt:, qr I '' CI? i ,, • --a ,ois-- 0 ‘ 4 I 1 .o I. „ ''' .,ct. 0 I lie .. 0 ' 6 1 Ir v;.',I! 0 ° • i -. '' AD , Orli\ do ••••• i . / d 6_ 1:06 , I > I II / : 41 0 0,1 •:91 • • 0 , • 0 • ' I • 1 i \ \II:• a 01010 6 ,11 t 1 . .• % 1 . • 1 • \1 la . IC slin -4j,1 • f'• ov• v... '1 i 0 74\ \ a 1 „ 1.., p I • 1 0 • • • @ -,./ \ 4.g . m . - ( . \ .. ,. . A z \ Ho I , CZ \ 1 1.. . i. 7 o 011111116ait 1 .6 • a , 1 ' ; A. r a 00 , . d,••••11' 1 ‘7" • • to \ 1\ ...... ... .............. .. . ili:IL t_ivaii ____, _ ._ 0_,:._, , ,i. ,,..1.. I., 4,0.- -* \ ,-- ."... 4.1 .--' •---- ---. -— ....._ ___II, ...:==- .i i . i-.1-L it. • tIW si. \ 1 - -.------f-- 's 6 — -- II \i 1—___\••60. - . -60.-,--1-----. , %.44_ • , • I i 0 • f r•i ' ,/' f-' • 7 • 5 1 \ \- '41c\I • ge •rXi-_.---'_-:..----1----...t._ cn i 1 5',D, , 1 4 • , I ..4 O g in \ VII •••• FJ ' °'6c 1 IR • • • • , .. . ,(3, _ °_ ism. cx? . ___•tg-1 • . I , • ?. ac 0 II Rig li ' • ; • : ' 1 , J. rk 3 ':.-i• \ \ . . •••• ..., i t : ; • I. . , fe Ea e m 1 1 v_ 0 0. . " It ; • • . • Ca , , , • •. \ 11 • / 1 1 ,,i .1 . 0 I. • I . • \ '§6 . ti • 1 I it olel .0. Z \ , ,•• 6. c. c, t. • L41 111 1 1 iiiiimaramommot, ' . (0 ! . • 11 k l ' i , . 1 . -0- e . I op, :4 ; i ft,1 Ti. ° 0 a • ,ii-----It ', ., 1;01( .• . • i : . a$ • \ ofi . I r . 1 1 ,• \ 1 r cn e . - I‘ . .:. ,. ,,. • • III 01 .• 01 ,-.- e • • ' .••••-10.47,\bk. , • •) 1 . • 7 . • 30"a •• ( i •1 1 r 1;)0,, ; ; ..1 I II I CO I , III , , I I . • I;• \ t '1 ng. • • 1 .\ . , O !t, • 1 6, a I H : . 1 C 1 I ""°' R ri . , , . . I , . . , . . „ !;. , . . . . . ...mewl..a rm.., 6 • V * I orp MEN ;._ Ili 1.:: ' '-c, \ 3.0. 'kn' .1i \ I ; 1 ••.-1, .• 1 0 - I = a rs,..o 640:- . , . . c i- • ? t ' l' •, , i 1 • 0 ® ir. 1 i ,• ) ) ; ; , I 1 i '-21710, , '1 i et ic, 6. ! :.• t 11 1 ' ' : .I' . , 7:11 ji, 0 .,, ! , . . • 1 ,„ • e, i s 1,?.,1 >1>I> J. Q ,I., ,. ! \ a I I/ ,i'l. ''' t.) ,-iii, 7-7) q . / ii- i • ! I H. , 1 , \ P- • it,-, i II iii 0111i? t 0: \ ` ' ' \ ' . 1 r ... c,' e ' f. : 4 q 1!" 1- 111 : ..- Nits" / o 7 )0 )• 1 . : c I II r Mg* . - •• : / , .io ; , i t,,- , up• ' o i 0 : •0 I . • I-. TO II 1 I i 1,0 i . *1`2L-e%%-'cr • , :.0 • c • °,0! 1!,, , \I i ' ;),9 a,- . i" )) I ,." . 10 IF i oc, : : \ \ , l ' il q = I ®j 4--si_____ ‘. • /._________ 0 c. • , : 1 ! i, ; 1 09 , I.\,.f ;i'a I?.a,:w; . ..1ItiariohIlliMelbaldra-----._nava i . I. i •• I h I • • : • (1) ' 0 , / 93 ' / 0 0.237.14' .0.,' ' =. . 5 , Greg L.Allwine. AlA - o . PiPigq,,,t,it:','4442,`,".ii • • CITY LIGHTS APARTMENTS RENTON. la. 0 • 11,:j) Y irr,k.i4- :-..-- -:,,.•.,,,....) PWPOR-‘, t,I.,, FOR NolITH BAY DEVELMENT COMOOATION (11 C ')sue date: cr.50.0,1 633 N.MILD. SUITE.0. Latest rev t: r: ' TAL0BA. WA 98406 OBIWW m , ASLA cr) i 304 main ave.so.,suite 200 renton,wa.98055 (206)271-7200 623-5732 Mel Easter • . . • • ; . . , i : . . , . . . _ --- , . • . , . : c.`"; 4'i. 0 iz NOTICE . OF PENDING SITE PLANAPPLICATION • . • • • .. . . . . . . . .. . • . . . . . . . . . . . •. .• DESCRIPTION : , . CITY LIGHTS APARTMENTS • NORTH BAY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ECF; SA-087-89 • APPLICANT SEEKS SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR A 70 UNIT APARTMENT COMPLEX TO BE LOCATED ON A VACANT 3.3 ACRE R-3, RESIDENTIAL . • MULTI-FAMILY, ZONED PARCEL. (NOTE: .DENSITY LEVEL HAS BEEN - ADJUSTED FOR GREENBELT ON-SITE.) • • GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS: • • EAST SIDE OF BENSON ROAD BETWEEN PUGET DRIVE AND SOUTH 26TH STREET. • • • PUBLIC APPROVALS REQUIRED : • o ' ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW o SITE PLAN APPROVAL o BUILDING PERMIT APPROVAL , PUBLIC COMMENTS WILL BE RECEIVED BY THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT ANYTIME PRIOR' TO PUBLIC HEARINGS . Al aD DURING PUBLIC HEARINGS. • FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 '• THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT4_ PROPER AUTHORIZATION - ---___,-_ , • CERTIFICATION '' - - I , Mr�,r Sr,_VeL , HEREBY CERTIFY TH T , it- • COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN I ' ' L- CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON OR NEARBY THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY ON :Su.1(3 �.5-., lq% 1 , • • • ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a LL. Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington ;+ • residing in Pi -4.).76U , on the ° S ( " -SIGNED : Y'Y)4174.1i4 day o 1 1 i. . ,.i _ k OF R4, 11/ V C% © Z oi c3TicE o � 0gTeo SEPS��O�Q OF PENDING SITE pLAN APPLICATION DESCRIPTION • • CITY LIGHTS APARTMENTS NORTH BAY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ECF; SA-087-89 APPLICANT SEEKS SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR A 70 UNIT APARTMENT COMPLEX TO BE LOCATED ON A VACANT 3 . 3 ACRE R-3 , RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY, ZONED PARCEL. (NOTE: DENSITY LEVEL HAS BEEN ADJUSTED FOR GREENBELT ON-SITE. ) GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS: EAST SIDE OF BENSON ROAD BETWEEN PUGET DRIVE AND SOUTH 26TH STREET. PUBLIC APPROVALS REQUIRED : o ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW o SITE PLAN APPROVAL o BUILDING PERMIT APPROVAL PUBLIC COMMENTS WILL BE RECEIVED BY THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT ANYTIME PRIOR TO PUBLIC HEARINGS A: DURING PUBLIC HEARINGS. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL. THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION L. . t ZONING DIVISION PLAN CHECK WORKSHEET ,i APPLICANT: NOY-01 �, flip. ADDRESS: N. I�fr�Al ' �'(.c.( C1 PHONE: �ACv/1'1GL S"5—94 cr3 ] PROJECT NAME: C I-h f �L-L j f-S A 1 - Silt__ p(QY f1 A ow-c , . LAND USE ZONE: g-.3 BRIEF DESCRIPTION: QE U•eS'1' .-40v' SAC_ r1cyt Q 2p{Y al. -c_r Qrksk 5iCie_ 6- 3e,Y.scm Roaot be-1-0ee-n Puo ems' (7r IYe ccilc( So o i ��o -�Sfre.•e-&. l`�9` ) DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Required/Allowed Project Okay a. Density(l !:15-0(S)c95 p i i,c AX('70 DUO PA b. Lot Size 7 czoo th .5J aore-s f c. Lot Width UP0 540 /foryrre-0 -- h �� �3 7r( ,x3 d. Lot Dept e. Setbacks 1. Front 30 / 30 .7 2. Side /� " 3. Rear `7 �a,' , 1 i .Fri w- � f'. Special Setbacks 40 R-t -o lye ,g C 'i° bra (1 l a )` g. Height 50# 3 h. Lot Coverage 36% f(p7o H �, i. Signs - f ,j. Landscaping/ G � c (�r Screening � • k. Irrigation ;.� 1. Parking/Loading /05 -6 --: /23 A.0 • Required Parking Stalls �� 7 f�3 � �( :; • Compact Ce ,.., ,,,�, �,7 1, • Handicapped -re �7' / • Driveways (width)e- 7 e*r_��'°r' <-1 Og, ;;. • Loading Areas �/( •, • • Aisle Widths / %�"T / m. Recreation � 7O�C'2e �n , n. Bonds f OF 1 FILE NOS SA=087-89 tiC ® c REN .101 . ( ) * is ;; + BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT ECF-087-89 _ N -V MASTER APPLICATiON NOTE TO APPLICANT: Since this is a comprehensive application form, only those Items related to your specific type of applications) are to be completed. (Please print or type. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) APPLICANT 1 1 TYPE OF APPLICATION NAME FEES ' North Bay;. Development Corp. ED ADDRESS REZONE*(FROM TO ) 633 N. Mildred, Suite "G" (J SPECIAL PERMIT* CITY ZIP E TEMPORARYPEMAIT* Tacoma, WA 98406 (D CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT* TELEPHONE : " ' SITE PLAN APPROVAL 866.20 (206) 565-9400 ED SPECIAL PERMIT FOR GRADE AND FILL No. of Cubic Yards: . VARIANCE* CONTACT PERSON From Section: NAME I * Justification Required Melvin R. Easter Johnson Braund Design Group, Inc. ADDRESS ' SUBDIVISIONS: 304 Wain Ave. South, Suite 200 L SHORT PLAT_ TTY Renton, WA 98055 ZIP Q TENTATIVE PLAT Q PRELIMINARY PLAT TELEPHONE (206)271-7200 (206) 623-5732 FINAL PLAT C::] WAIVER (Justification Required) OWNER NO. OF LOTS: NAME PLAT NAME: r ._ Renton School _District _. _ _ . ' _ _ ADDRESS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: 435 Main Ave. South CD PRELIMINARY CITY ZIP • Renton, WA 98055 FINAL TELEPHONE , P.U.D. NAME: Q Residential Q Industrial ElCommercial ED Mixed LOCATION1 MOBILE HOME PARKS: PROPERTY ADDRESS Benson Road - Cross Street: 26th TENTATIVE EXISTING USE PRESENT ZONING PRELIMINARY Vacant R-3 FINAL PROPOSED USE - ` ' Y-x PARK NAME: Multi-Family, apartments NUMBER OF SPACES: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE 240.00 • SQ. FT. ACRES . AREA: 11144 j 184 :"3::31 TOTAL FEES f jl d(p. 20 A I PLANNINGDIVISIOIITAFF USE ONLY -- ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING ;CITY Op ,ew 1 I DATE STAMP APPLICATION RECEIVED BY: 11- . JUl_ 0 3 1999 APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: oAccepted RECEIVED o Incomplete Notification Sent On By: (Initials) DATE ROUTED ADDITIONAL MATERIAL RECEIVED BY: b APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: 7 .ZO " ED Accepted 0 Incomplete Notification Sent On By: (Initials) ROUTED TO: Building CA Design Eng. Fire IN Parks Police . Ot Policy Dev. Traffic Eng. ,01 Utilities \ 4111 • Legal description of property (if more space is required, attach a separate sheet). See Attachment • • • • • • AFFIDAVIT • I, John M. Miller • , being duly sworn, declare that I am authorized representative to act for the property owner, (owner of the property involved In this application_and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. • SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS o`T(� DAY . OF 9r//72.6/ • NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF ' WASHINGTON, qe,rit RESIDING AT . lb) (N me of Notary Public) (Sigi ture of;r«�-REPRES_E'NTATIVE • a 633 N. Mildred Ste. G (Address) (Address) Tacoma, Washington. 98406 Tacoma, Washington 98406 (City) (St 'te) "' (Zip)' (206) 565-9400' .. (Telephone) .+ Acceptance of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete application. Plans and other materials required to constitute a complete application are listed in the "Application Procedure." • • • ky Form ti l'79 AFFADAVIT State of Washington Sworn Statement County of King Dr. Robert C. Roberts on oath states: 1. The Renton School District is the owner of the property legally described on the attached Exhibit A. 2. The Renton School District has entered into an Earnest Money Agreement with North Bay Development, Inc. to purchase and develop the property. 3. Pursuant to the Earnest Money Agreement, North Bay Development, Inc. is authorized to proceed with the necessary preliminary planning for said development Date Dr. Robert . Roberts Acting Su rintendent Sworn and subscribed before me this 22nd day of June, 1989. (C1/42-6648 gi) v Notary PLURlING DMSION CRY OE RENToN JUL 0 3 196,9 THAT PORTION nF THE. NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTH, •T QUARTER OF SECTION . 29., TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, N.M. , IN KING`bUNTY. WASHINGTON, D E S CRTRE VItS"TOT``lIMS: • • BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION: THENCE NORTH . • B(1012139" EAST ALONE THE SOUTH LINE THEWEOF-337.77 'FtET .TFIEI4CE NORTH 1°42'40" EAST 749.65. FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 8a017120n WEST 191.67 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF BENSON ROAD (STATE ROAD NO. .531 THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID EAST LINE TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 29; THENCE NORTH 87°03'52" EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF SECTION ' 29 TO 4 POINT WHICH IS SOUTH 87°O0'52" EAST A DISTANCE 999.22 FEET FROM THE NORTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE SOUTH O2624'53" EAST A DISTANCE 'OF 363. 57 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 1B°51.'39" EAST A DISTANCE OF 50.24 FEET'; THENCE SOUTH Ol04S'251' EAST A DISTANCE OF 197.67 FEET MORE OR LESS TO A POINT % HICH REARS SOUTH Bb°17'ZO" EAST FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH eB°17' ZO" WEST 47.21 FEET MORE OR ,LESS TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THE PORTION LYING WITHIN ROW LAKE PIPE LINE RIGHT-OF-WAY. • • • P‘Cw-- 41141 • - 4 - Y LIGHTS APART TS LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 2, CITY OF RENTON SHORT PLAT NUMBER 070-80 (ALSO KNOWN AS NELSON MIDDLE SCHOOL SHORT PLAT) , RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8107299002 , SAID LOT 2 BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTH QUARTER OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT TIDE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION; THENCE NORTH 88 DEGREES 12'38" EAST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE THEREOF 337.77 FEET; THENCE NORTH '1 DEGREES 42'40" EAST 749. 65 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT. OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 88 DEGREES 17'20" WEST 191. 67 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF BENSON ROAD (STATE ROAD NO.5) ; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID EAST LINE TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 29; THENCE NORTH 87 DEGREES 08'52" EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF SECTION 29 TO A POINT WHICH IS SOUTH 87 DEGREES 08'52" WEST A DISTANCE OF 989.22 FEET FROM THE NORTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE SOUTH 02 DEGREES 24'53" EAST A DISTANCE OF 363 .57 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 18 DEGREES 51'39" EAST A DISTANCE OF 50.24 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 01 DEGREES 45'25" EAST A DISTANCE OF 197. 67 FEET MORE OR LESS TO A POINT WHICH BEARS SOUTH 88 DEGREES 17'20" EAST FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 88 DEGREES 17'20" WEST 47.21 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THE NORTH 30 FEET THEREOF, LYING WITHIN BOW LAKE PIPE LINE RIGHT OF WAY. Or i' ECF: L087-89 • '% eft O LU: • c) 4$ o z City of Renton SA-nR7_R 9 SIM 00 0 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST ,9gTED SEP�„t��Q • „ Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43,21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for allproposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to.answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now;may;avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal°,or its environmental. effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask'you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impacts. Use of Checklist for Nonproject Proposals: (Please Type or Print Legibly) Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even 'though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION,, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). . • For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: City Lights Apartments 2. Name of applicant: North Bay Development'Corporation 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact•person: 633 N. Mildred Contact Person: Melvin R. Easter Suite G Johnson Braund Design Group Tacoma, WA 98406 (206) 565-9400 304 Main Ave. South, St.. 200 4. Date checklist prepared: Renton, WA 98055 6-22-89 #271-7200 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton- Planning & Zoning 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): The .applicant .plans to submit for building permit'upon completion of site plan_approval process. Construction will commence as soon as weather conditions allow. PLANNING DIVISION MTV OF RENTON JUL 0 31989 RECEWED . 7. Do you have any ,is for future additions, expansion further activity related to or connected with this proposal? if yes, explain. No 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. A complete soils report is attached - a significant amount of additional environmental information was generated for the "Victoria Hills" project located directly across the Benson Road. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered:by your proposal? If yes, explain. None known • 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Site plan approval Building permit 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. •` .. The proposed development will contain 70'apartment'"units housed in (5) 22 story wood framed buildings situated on. .a 3.3 acre site to take full advantage of the valley view to the west. A recreation center will be'located 'central to the units and contain a leasing office, social room with warming kitchen`.exercise 'room and inside/outside spa. Carport and garages will also be provided. ' 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information-for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topography map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with• any permit applications related to this checklist. The property is located on the east side. of .the Benson Road midway. between Puget Drive and S. 26th Street. Victoria Hills Apartments are under construciton directly across the street. Fred Nelson Junior High School 'abuts.,thq.,site. on the east, Presbyterian Church property is located to the south and'i�existing condominiums on the north. See attached legal description and vicinity map B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle j one); ., flat, rolling, ( steep slopes mountainous, other •30%to 40% slopes in the eastern 1/3 and 10% to 25% slopes in the western 2/3 . b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 40% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, caly, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. . See attached soils report d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. None known • - 2 - a. Describe 1 _.rpose, type, and approximate sties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Cut and fill will be utilized for road access, circulation and for the building pads of the multi-family units.. Approximately 1.0,000 yards fo soil will be balanced by cut and fill operations. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Cut and fill operations create a potential for erosion during development, however, a temporary erosion control plan will reduce the potential for erosion. A temporary erosion control plan would consist of silt fences, holding ponds & drainage swales for on to watAboutu what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Impervious surface area including buildings, patios, sidewalks, parking area will be approximately 64,335 S.F. (45%) . h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Measures to reduce and control erosion include the implementation of a temporary erosion control plan to consist of silt fences, holding ponds, drainage swales and check dams. 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Some dust during construction. After completion, automobile emissions (CO2, NOx, and hydrocarbons) and fireplaces. b. Are there any off-site sources of emission? None known c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Watering site during construction, conformance with State of Washington Energy Code and the E.P.A./D.O. E. Standards for fireplaces. 3. WATER a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or;in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. .;. (in r,;rl r! None known 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None - 3 - 4) Will the I .osal require surface water withd .ils or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximately quantities if known. There is an existing storm system that enters the site •near the .middle: of the east peoperty line. This approx. 3.0 CFS will be tightlined -through •the site to the storm system in Benson Road. • . 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so. note location on the site plan. • ;. No 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No . • b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and appaoximately quantities if known. No 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals . . .; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to, be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. .. . None • • c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Water will be collected in a conventional storm drainage system via catch basins and pipes in the parking areas. Detention will be provided onsite. Water will flow west/ north west under. the Benson Road and continue into the Victorian Hills project. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No - 4 - • d. Proposed ._.Ares to reduce or control surfac ,. ,und, and runoff water impacts, if any: - Water will be collected into a conventional storm drainage system with detention provided onsite to control water runoff impacts. 4. Plants a. Check or circle type .f vegetation found on the site: ' deciduous tree: a de maple aspen, other ;. ' , evergreen treecedar pine, other • is Shrubs o grass o crop or grain o Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other o water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other o other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Due to the slope conditions, a large amount of existing alder and other existing trees along with associated understory will be removed. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: • A significant area of existing vegetation will be preserved - especially in the steepest portions (eastern side) of the site. The developed area will be landscaped with indigenous plant materials. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: None.•observed Birds: Hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Unknown - 5 - d. Proposed ures to preserve or enhance wildl j any: Preservation of existing trees.and understory, where possible. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? ' Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc., Electricity will be used for 'heat, lighting, hot!•water and cooking .. ' Wood burning or natural gas fireplaces are proposed for each apartment' unit.' " b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. : . . ,, , ; . No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Compliance with the Washington State Energy Code and'local jurisdictional requirements. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards,, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None required 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: ' None required b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Some traffic noise from :adjacent arteri al street. - 6 - • 2) What typt . levals of noise would be create ,ir associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. ' Construction noise will be generated on a short term basis and increas'dd .trafficonoise over the long term.0 onstruction will be limited to daylight hours and the major traffic noise will occur during morning and evening commute hours. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Construction scheduling during daylight hours and compliance with all jurisdictional requirements. 8. Land and Shoreline Use • a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The site is currently vacant. Property to the north is developed multi-family and to the west is multi-family under construction. The site on the east is_ a .Junior High School and the property to the south is a church. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No • c. Describe any structures on the site. : •• ' None d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? . No e. What is the current zoning classification'of the site? R-3 f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Medium density residential (multi-family) g. If applicable, what is the current'shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Using a multiplier of 2.1 people• per unit, the complete project when fully rented would house approx. 147 people. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None - 7 - • • • 1. Proposed cures to ensure the proposal is c atible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Compliance with City of Renton zoning and planning regulations and submission for site plan approval . 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if, any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Approximately 70 middle income apartment units. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. ; _ None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas: what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. Approximately 35 feet;exterior materials will include cedar .siding and trim with composition shingles. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? The site topography will provide outstanding views for the proposed living units without blocking views from adjacent properties. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Sensitive site planning, landscape design and use of building materials compatable with surrounding development. 11. Light and Glare - a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Parking lot, unit exterior and. vehicle headlights will be present from dusk till dawn. 3 , b. Could light or glare from the finished •project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No c. What existing off—site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Effective site planning, screening, use of "shielded" light standards. - 8 - .12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: A recreation center appropriate in scale to this size development will be provided which will contain a leasing office, social room with warming kitchen, big-screen TV, exercise room and spa. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state. or local preservation registers;known to be on or next to the site? . If so. generally describe. No b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None known c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts,if any: - None 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans. if any. Site access will be directly from Benson Road on the west boundary. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximately distance to the nearest transit stop? 0 Yes c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Approximately 123 parking spaces will be provided and no spaces will be eliminated. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). A circulation system of private roads, internal tothe project, will be developed to serve the multi-family buildings. Benson Road will be widened to a five lane section to just soul of the main entrance. Southerly from there, it will be tapered back to the existing 2 lane, - 9 - 1 • e. Will the .ct use (or occur in the immedia ..:inity of) water, rail, or air,transportation? If so. generally describe. No f. How many vehicular trips per day 'would be'generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Using 6.5 V.T.D./Uhit 455 V.T.D. will be generated. Peak volumes will occur between 6:00 and 9:00 a.m. and 4:00. to 6:00 p.m. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: Off site street improvements as required. by the City of Renton. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need'for public services (for example: fire protection. police protection, health care. schools, other)? If so, generally describe. A proportionate increase in need for public services including fire, police and • health care. ' b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Compliance with City of Renton jurisdictional requirements. 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities current available at' the site: =MO natural gas, : _ _ _ = elephone enitery sew!9 sep is sys em, o = . b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. - Sanitary sewer and water provided by interlocal agreeament with, the City of Renton - Telephone U.S. West - Electricity - .Puget Power ; - Refuse Service- Rainier Disposal C. SIGNATURE I. the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above Information is true and complete. It is understood that .the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: /5" - ' Name Printed: V/ h—P #176 11-8-84 CI' .' LIGHTS APARTME�.. _TS LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 2, CITY OF RENTON SHORT PLAT NUMBER 070-80 (ALSO KNOWN AS NELSON MIDDLE SCHOOL SHORT PLAT) , RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8107299002 , SAID LOT 2 BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTH QUARTER OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT TIDE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION; THENCE NORTH 88 DEGREES 12'38" EAST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE THEREOF 337.77 FEET; THENCE NORTH 1 DEGREES 42'40" EAST 749. 65 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT. OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 88 DEGREES 17'20" WEST 191. 67 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF BENSON ROAD (STATE ROAD NO.5) ; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID EAST LINE TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 29; THENCE NORTH 87 DEGREES 08'52" EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF SECTION 29 TO A POINT WHICH IS SOUTH 87 DEGREES 08'52" WEST A DISTANCE OF 989.22 FEET FROM THE NORTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE SOUTH 02 DEGREES 24'53" EAST A DISTANCE OF 363 .57 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 18 DEGREES 51'39" EAST A DISTANCE OF 50.24 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 01 DEGREES 45'25" EAST A DISTANCE OF 197. 67 FEET MORE OR LESS TO A POINT WHICH BEARS SOUTH 88 DEGREES 17'20" EAST FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 88 DEGREES 17'20" WEST 47.21 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THE NORTH 30 FEET THEREOF, LYING WITHIN BOW LAKE PIPE LINE RIGHT OF WAY. PLANK WG DIVISION CITY OF f.ENTON JUL 0 3 1989 J i r_-_-_1-1__ - ____, rill!. i i i SPRING. GLEN I - � ; I I ELEM SCHOOL .. �_"� Ei.............tl,•--•-(i. QN. • I I • \�\ I. . CH , .. ,1' I zillii I r---1 % 1 i \\ _ 11 /i l \, >) 1 1 ii....taS I • . ..c.) \ 1 I ....._,.__ _I el_rp I: 7 -_ ``\\ ::: :T:— Ili -._. I 1� ---PARR .--._. % ��__ — I 1 i 1-1t f I _ 1 h / i - - - r 1 \ ^ III ` \— -_ / i Z - Z ' i �'- ---- t_ • r — _r- =_--t / ///// / /ram - '`r _— > i W-- i PROJECT. SITE cc �. _ 1%, z 1 I \ RESBYTERIAN CHURCH 0 I 7}I i_ I _ F I I W grl // . 1\ /, \\ 0 1 1 g---___,Cz 1-1 (qi:j \al- • 1 �- -- L ! II -� - �CI_�TOR1A HI�.{:N_AP�►e�MEelts_—_._ I �, 01%& r"---..,Q - . 7 \\ ..,... _. ---T- . . , 6ito \ 1 2..r....-_--1 ,... ...---j ...i? e,-, st-0 \........ 1 _...../......: "<?i 0 �—r-——_�`\ O(�P ..� `lam - /r�i%- (�0 //\�/\`J���` �` � ) _al .....1:13 ........- 4:7).-...441441(.1....:zi......1 ,•,N ../ ILI J/ J r rJ . - 7� 1/^� ‘-Q--) 'N' mil'. . ./........ L....„...r\/ / ...- .._ „...'t . *. k*Q ./.‘ Ils(c‘ CC ..p3 ,,,, ...oci, . Oritiz , 1,%<?, 14:1 1ILI � - i�.� `�_- •=ram"' 0. -� ``' r- -'% -ci .= --\ :--, ___,,.-0 .v ' c...N 1 =.`SINGLE-pAMMLY;RESIDENTIAL, .._ .1 ,l PREPARED FOR NORTHBAY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION -1(1.Ait A 14,--ii."/„Z Keith Lichfield l'.-•• �/ S• _LA , Geotechnical Engineer p4 0 of AS/ ,�' '//// ' Zicc . `; ;•,.1., R/' / 42 btrt Levinson, P.E. � i469iPco `�`t'Presidentss T c% dr- zs1CNAL-�1I GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY - CITY LIGHTS APARTMENTS RENTON, WASHINGTON E-4218-1 - June 15, 1989 . .. , ' s: ' 1 it - ;,i,';; I Earth Consultants, Inc. 1805 - 136th Place Northeast _ Suite 101 - ( Bellevue,Washington 98005 `_' l (206) 643-3780 222 East 26th Street, Suite 103 Tacoma,Washington 98411-9998 (206) 272-6608 LPLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON JUL 0 31989 RECEIVED 1 • t -Earth Consultants Inc. �ilr ' Geotechnical Engineers.Geologists&Environmental Scientists • June 15, 1989 E-4218-1 • Northbay Development Corporation • . • 633 North Mildred, Suite G Tacoma, Washington 98406 Attention: John Miller Subject: Geotechnical Engineering Study • City Lights Apartments Renton, Washington • • ( .Dear Mr. Miller: • We`Vare-pleased to, submit herewith our report titled "Geotechnical Engineering Study, City • Lights Apartments, Renton, Washington." This report presents the results of our field exploration, selective laboratorytests, and engineering analyses. The purpose and scope of -- our study was outlined in our April 27, 1989, proposal. . Our study indicates .that the site is underlain with competent bearing soil. Due to the limited access to the north end of the property we were unable to explore the area north of the drainage swale shown on Plate 2. g We do not expect the subsurface conditions in the unexplored area to be vary significantly to those found in the south. However, we should be contacted during the initial stages of construction to confirm that the northern subsurface conditions are consistent with the recommendations provided in this report. Based on the encountered conditions, and the results of our analyses, it is our opinion the . proposed apartment buildings can be supported on conventional spread and wall footings bearing on the competent native soils or structural fill, depending on final grades. • These recommendations, along with other geotechnically related aspects of the project, are discussed in more detail in the text of the attached report. • • • • 1805.-136th ftdi N.EG0tNLOt4e vdei Washington 98005 222 E.26th Street,Suite 101,Tacoma,Washington 98411-9998 Bellevue(206)643-3780 Seattle(206)464-1584 FAX(206)746-0860 Tacoma(206)272-6608 1 \ Northbay. Development Corporation E-4218-1 - June 15, 1989 Page 2 We appreciate this opportunity to have been of service to you during this initial phase of project development, and we look forward to working with you in the future phases as the project comes to fruition. In the meantime, should you or your consultants have any questions about the content of this report, or if we can be of further assistance, please call. Very truly yours, EARTH CONSULTANTS, INC. jkati‘ Keith Ar Litchfield Geofe.c:nical Engineer• . Robert S. Levinson, P. E. • President KAL/RSL/kml __ • Earth Consultants, Inc. IMPORTANT INFORM) ON 1 ABOUT YOUR • GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT ! More construction problems are caused by site subsur- technical engineers who then render an opinion about face conditions than any other factor. As troublesome as overall subsurface conditions,.their likely reaction to subsurface problems can be, their frequency and extent proposed construction activity,and appropriate founda- have been lessened considerably in recent years, due in tion design. Even under optimal circumstances actual large measure to programs and publications of ASFE/ conditions may differ from those inferred to exist, { The Association of Engineering Firms Practicing in because no geotechnical engineer, no matter how the Geosciences. qualified,and no subsurface exploration program, no matter how comprehensive, can reveal what is hidden by The following suggestions and observations are offered earth, rock and time.The actual interface between mate- , to help you reduce the geotechnical-related delays, rials may be far more gradual or abrupt than a report cost-overruns and other costly headaches that can indicates.Actual conditions in areas not sampled may - occur during a construction project. differ from predictions. Nothing can be done to prevent the unanticipated, but steps can be taken to help minimize their A GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING impact. For this reason, most experienced owners retain their REPORT IS BASED ON A UNIQUE SET geotechnical consultants through the construction stage,to iden- tify variances,conduct additional tests which may be OF PROJECT-SPECIFIC FACTORS needed,and to recommend solutions to problems encountered on site. A geotechnical engineering report is based on a subsur- 1 face exploration plan designed to incorporate a unique SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS j set of project-specific factors.These typically include: the general nature of the structure involved, its size and CAN CHANGE configuration; the location of the structure on the site . and its orientation; physical concomitants such as Subsurface conditions may be modified by constantly- • access roads, parking lots,and underground utilities, changing natural forces. Because a geotechnical engi- and the level of additional risk which the client assumed neering report is based on conditions which existed at by virtue of limitations imposed upon the exploratory •- the time of subsurface exploration,construction decisions program.To help avoid costly problems,consult the should not be based on a geotechnical engineering report whose geotechnical engineer to determine how any factors •. adequacy may have been affected by time. Speak with the geo- .B which change subsequent to the date of the report may technical consultant to learn if additional tests are affect its recommendations. advisable before construction starts. Unless your consulting geotechnical engineer indicates Construction operations at or adjacent to the site and otherwise, your geotechnical engineering report should not natural events such as floods,earthquakes or ground be used: water fluctuations may also affect subsurface conditions r •When the nature of the proposed structure is and,thus,the continuing adequacy of a geotechnical changed, for example, if an office building will be report.The geotechnical engineer should be kept erected instead of a parking garage,or if a refriger- apprised of any such events, and should be consulted to ; ated warehouse will be built instead of an unre- determine if additional tests are necessary. frigerated one; ' •when the size or configuration of the proposed GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES ARE ' (`- structure is altered; PERFORMED FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES L •when the location or orientation of the proposed AND PERSONS structure is modified; •when there is a change of ownership, or Geotechnical engineers' reports are prepared to meet •for application to an adjacent site. the specific needs of specific individuals.A report pre- t - Geotechnical engineers cannot accept responsibility for problems pared for a consulting civil engineer may not be ade- -,— which may develop if they are not consulted after factors consid- quate for a construction contractor,or even some other L ered in their reports development have changed. . consulting civil engineer. Unless indicated otherwise, this report was prepared expressly for the client involved and expressly for purposes indicated by the client. Use MOST GEOTECHNICAL "FINDINGS" by any other persons for any purpose,or by the dient L ARE PROFESSIONAL ESTIMATES • for a different purpose, may result in problems. No indi- , vidual other than the client should apply this report for its Site exploration identifies actual subsurface conditions intended purpose without first conferring with the geotechnical 1 only at those points where samples are taken,when engineer. No person should apply this report for any purpose they are taken. Data derived through sampling and sub- other than that originally contemplated without first conferring sequent laboratory testing are extrapolated by geo- with the geotechnical engineer. I [_ TABLE OF CONTENTS • E-4218-1 Page INTRODUCTION • Project Description 1 Scope of Services 1 SITE CONDITIONS Surface 2 Subsurface 3 Groundwater 3 DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS • General • 3 Site Preparation and General Earthwork 4 Foundations 5 Retaining Walls . 6 Slab-on-Grade Floors 7 Excavations and Slopes 8 Rockeries 8 Site Drainage 9 Pavement Areas 10 LIMITATIONS Additional Services 11 Appendix A - Field Exploration Appendix B - Laboratory Testing • Appendix C - Associated Rockery Construction (ARC) Guidelines ILLUSTRATIONS • E-4218-1 Plate 1 Vicinity Map Plate 2 Test Pit Location Plan Plate 3 Legend Plates 4 through 7 Test Pit Logs Plates 8 and 9 Grain Size Analyses Plate 10 Retaining Wall Drainage and Backfill Plate 11 Typical Footing Subdrain Detail Earth Consultants, Inc. • Y GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY CITY LIGHTS APARTMENTS - RENTON, WASHINGTON • E-4218-1 INTRODUCTION Project Description The subject site is located in Renton, Washington, approximately as indicated on the Vicinity Map, Plate 1. The site is bordered to the north-by multi-family residences, to the west by Benson Road South, to the east by school grounds, and to the south by undeveloped property. The purpose of this study is to explore the existing subsurface conditions at the site and, on this basis, to develop geotechnical recommendations for the proposed site development. - • We understand it is intended to develop the subject site by constructing several apartment buildings two to three stories in height. These structures will have a combination of concrete slab-on-grade floors and crawl spaces with supported wood frames. It is also possible some of these structures will require basement retaining walls. Cuts and fills are estimated to be up to ten feet in height. Rockeries may also be implemented into the final construction • plans. While no specific, design data are presently available, based on our experience with similar construction, we estimate the total dead plus live loads are expected to be as follows: •. Wall loads - . 2 kips per lineal foot • Column loads - 50 kips • Slab loads - 100 pounds per square foot (psf) If any of the above design criteria change, we should be consulted to review the recommendations contained in this report. In any case, we recommend that Earth Consultants, Inc. (ECI) be retained to perform a general review of the final design. Scope of Services L. We performed this study in general accordance with the scope of services outlined in our April 27, 1989, proposal. On this basis, our report addresses: • subsurface soil and groundwater conditions; • suitability of existing on-site materials for use as fill, or recommendations for imported fill materials; • site preparation, grading and earthwork procedures, including details of fill placement and compaction; Earth Consultants, Inc. • Northbay Development Corporation E-4218-1 June 15, 1989 Page 2 • short-term and long-term groundwater management and erosion control measures; • foundation support alternatives, including bearing capacity and resistance of lateral loads for conventional foundations; • estimates of potential total and differential settlement magnitudes; • rockery construction; • parking area and access roadway design pavement sections. This report has been prepared for specific application to this project in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by other members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions in this area for the exclusive use of Northbay Development Corporation and their representatives. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made. We recommend that this report, in its,entirety, be included in the project contract documents for the information of the contractor. SITE CONDITIONS Surface At the time our study was performed, the site, proposed building locations, and our exploratory locations were approximately as shown on the Boring and Test Pit Location Plan, Plate 2. The site is heavily overgrown with deciduous trees, blackberry bushes, and thick underbrush. Two natural drainage swales run from east to west across the property. Light surface runoff was observed in both swales during our field work. However, during our site reconnaissance in December of 1987, heavy surface runoff was observed in the northern most swale which is six (6) to ten (10) feet deep. The site topography,generally consists of slopes bordering the property along the west and east property lines and a relatively flat portion in the middle of the property between the slopes. A slope of 1.6H:1V (horizontal:vertical) to 3H:1V slope rises above Benson Road (west property line) for a horizontal distance of about twenty-five (25) feet. At the top of L the slope the surface tapers off to a flatter portion that gradually slopes at about 6H:1.V for a horizontal distance of approximately one-hundred and forty (140) feet to the eastern slope. The eastern slope is about 2.4H:1V for a horizontal distance of one-hundred (100) feet. • Earth Consultants, Inc. Northbay Development Corporation E-4218-1 June 15, 1989 Page 3 Subsurface The site was explored by excavating eight (8) test pits at the approximate locations shown on Plate 2. Please refer to the Test Pit Logs, Plates 4 through 7, for a more detailed description of the conditions encountered at each location explored. A description of the field exploration methods and laboratory testing program is included in the appendix of this report. The following is a generalized description of the subsurface conditions encountered. Our exploratory test pits generally encountered intermixed loose to medium dense silty sand and sandy silt two to five feet below the surface. Below the surface layer dense to very dense silty sand with variable amounts of gravel was encountered to the depths explored. The deeper soil is typically called "hardpan" or Glacial till. Access was limited in the northerly one hundred seventy (170) feet. A visual examination.of.:this area indicates the subsurface conditions to be similar to the explored southerly portion of the site. Groundwater Groundwater seepage was observed in Test Pit 7 at ten (10) feet while excavating and is shown on the test pit log. However, the groundwater seepage level is not static; thus one may expect fluctuations in the level and flow depending on the season, amount of rainfall, surface water runoff, and other factors. Generally, the water level is higher in the wetter L winter months. Two natural drainage swales are aligned east to west across the property. At the time of our field work, light surface runoff was observed in the swales. j: DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS General Based on the results of our study, it is our opinion the site can be developed generally as planned. It is evident the area of proposed development is underlain at a relatively shallow depth with competent bearing soil. The proposed buildings can be supported on conventional 1 continuous and spread footings bearing on competent native soils or structural fill, depending upon final grade. Pavements and slabs can be supported on at least one foot of structural L fill. The bearing soil for the structures is expected to be at a depth of about three to five feet below existing grade. L Earth Consultants, Inc. • Northbay Development Corporation E-4218-1 June 15, 1989 Page 4 T The area north of the drainage swale (shown on Plate 2) was not explored due to limited access. This area.is approximately one-hundred and seventy feet south of the north property line and the full depth, east to west, of the property. We do not expect the subsurface conditions in the unexplored area to be vary significantly to those found to the south. However, we should be contacted during the initial stages of construction to confirm that the northern subsurface conditions are consistent with the recommendations provided in this report. • Two natural drainage swales cut east to west across the site. It appears from the site plan provided by the Johnson Braund Design Group that buildings will be located over these swales. Depending on the final site grades, the drainage swales may require as much as ten feet of fill. Prior to site regrading and fill procedures, the surface runoff carried by the swales will have to be rerouted to a suitable discharge, or a drainage pipe provided beneath the fill. (_ At the time of our field work, the site soils were close to their optimum moisture content and may be suitable for use as structural fill. However, the site soils are moisture-sensitive and may become difficult or impossible to work or compact. In this case, you will need to import a clean, free-draining granular fill material. It appears that several basement or crawl space retaining walls may be included in construction. If so, they will need to be designed to retain the soils against which they are L built. The inclusion of an adequate wall drain system is important to help avoid the potential buildup of hydrostatic pressure behind the walls. These and other geotechnically related aspects of this project are discussed in more detail in the following sections of this report. Site Preparation and General Earthwork All building and pavement areas should be stripped and cleared of all trees, surface L, vegetation, organic matter and any other deleterious material. We anticipate that a topsoil stripping depth of four to six inches will be required. {. Stripped materials should be removed from the site and disposed, or used in landscaping, as desired. The stripped material should not be mixed with any materials to be used as structural fill. All fill material used to achieve design site elevations should meet the �J requirements for structural fill. • Earth Consultants, Inc. Northbay Development Corporation - E-4218-1 June 15, 1989 Page 5 Following the stripping operation, the ground surface where structural fill, foundations, or slabs are to be placed should be proofrolled and compacted to a reasonable non-yielding condition, and then probed. If any soft or unstable areas are encountered, they should be appropriately moisture conditioned and recompacted. If, after recompaction, they remain soft or unstable, they should be overexcavated to a depth that will provide a stable base. Typically, a depth of two to three feet is adequate for this purpose. The overexcavated unsuitable material should be removed and disposed. The resulting overexcavation should then be backfilled with either a compacted structural fill or crushed rock. Ideally, but particularly during wet weather, structural fill should comprise a free-draining, granular organic-free material with a maximum size of three inches. It should contain less than 5 percent fines (silt and clay-size particles passing the No. 200 mesh sieve). During dry weather, any compatible non-organic soil meeting the above maximum size criterion may be used as structural fill. Structural fill under floor slabs and footings should be placed in thin horizontal lifts not • exceeding ten inches in loose thickness. Each lift should be compacted to at least 95 percent of maximum dry density, as determined by ASTM Test Designation D-1557-78 (Modified L. Proctor). Fill under pavements and walks should be placed in similar thin horizontal lifts and, with the exception of the upper twelve (12) inches, be compacted to at least 90 percent L., of maximum density. The top twelve (12) inches should be compacted to at least 95 percent maximum density. Fills placed on any slopes steeper than 4H:1V should be benched into competent native soil. All fill material should be placed at or near the optimum moisture content. If the materials are too wet to be compacted to the required degree, it will be necessary to dry them or replace them with a more granular material. Fill materials can be dried by aeration or by intermixing cement powder to absorb excess moisture. Foundations The proposed structures can be supported on conventional spread footings provided the recommendations in this report ate followed. The footings should bear on competent dense to very dense silty sandy gravel or on structural fill placed over competent native bearing soils, depending upon final grades and encountered soil conditions. Conventional spread footings can be designed on the basis of the following parameters: I— o Allowable soil-bearingpressure = 2500 psf for native medium dense to dense Lsilty sand and gravel and structural fill, including all dead and live loads. Earth Consultants, Inc. • Northbay Development Corporation E-4218-1 June 15, 1989 Page 6 • Minimum depth of perimeter = 18 inches footing; below adjacent final exterior grade. • Minimum depth of interior = 12 inches footings; below top of floor slab. •. Minimum width of wall footings = 18 inches • Minimum lateral dimension of • = 24 inches column footings • Estimated post-construction = 1 inch, or less settlement • Estimated post-construction = 3/4 inch differential settlement; across building width s, A one-third increase in the above allowable bearing pressures can be used when considering ( short-term transitory wind or seismic loads. Lateral loads can be resisted by friction between the foundation and the supporting r compacted fill subgrade or by passive earth pressure acting on the buried portions of the foundations. For the latter, the foundations must be poured "neat" against the existing soil or backfilled with a compacted fill meeting the requirements of structural fill: L • Passive pressure = 300 pcf equivalent fluid weight • Coefficient of friction = 0.35 As a precautionarymeasure, we recommend drains beplaced around allperimeter footings. g More specific details of perimeter foundation drains are provided in the Site Drainage section of this report. • L_ Earth Consultants, Inc. Northbay Development Corporation E-4218-1 June 15, 1989 Page 7 r__. Retaining Walls Depending on the final design plans, we understand basement or crawl space retaining walls may be used for some of the buildings. These walls must be designed to resist the loads imposed by the retained soils. We recommend the following parameters be used in wall design: • Walls unrestrained against = 35 pcf equivalent movement at the top fluid weight • Walls restrained against = 55 pcf equivalent movement at the top fluid weight These parameters assume adequate drainage behind the wall to prevent hydrostatic pressure buildup, and a level backfill surface. Floor or other surcharge loads are not included in these design values. If additional loads are to be applied, they should be added to the above design values. The restrained retaining wall lateral load values are for walls that are restrained against lateral movement at the top. Therefore, the wall should not be backfilled until construction of the floor level at the top of the wall is completed. When backfilled, the retaining walls L. must have a suitable drainage system installed, as described on Plate 11. • Slab-on-Grade Floors l_. Slab-on-grade floors can be used with conventional foundations provided they are placed on ( competent native bearing soil or on at least one foot of structural fill.- Any fill or native soils disturbed by construction activity should either be recompacted or overexcavated and replaced with compacted structural fill or crushed rock. To prevent for moisture build-up on the subgrade, .the slab should be provided with a capillary break consisting of a minimum of four inches of free-draining sand and gravel. We recommend that a vapor barrier, such as a 6-mil plastic membrane, be placed over the capillary break beneath the slab to reduce both water-vapor transmission through the slab. {._ Two inches of damp sand may be placed over the membrane for protection during construction and to aid in curing of the concrete. Earth Consultants, Inc. Northbay Development Corporation E-4218-1 June 15, 1989 Page 8 Excavations and Slopes Cuts on the order of ten feet are anticipated for this project. You should be aware excavation slopes, including utility trenches, be greater than the limits specified in local, state and Federal safety regulations. Temporary cuts greater than four feet in depth should be sloped at an inclination no steeper than 1:1 (Horizontal:Vertical). If slopes of this inclination, or flatter, cannot be constructed, or if excavations greater than four feet in depth are required, temporary shoring may be necessary. This shoring will help protect against slope or excavation collapse, and will provide protection to workmen in the excavation. If temporary shoring is required, we will be available to provide geotechnical shoring design criteria, if requested. • All permanent cut and fill slopes should be inclined no steeper than 3H:2V and 2H:1V, respectively. These recommendation are applicable to slopes with a maximum height of ten feet. If higher slopes are anticipated, we should be contacted for the appropriate design and I construction criteria. We also recommend that all excavated slopes be examined by ECI's representative at the time of construction to verify that conditions are as anticipated. Supplementary recommendations can then be developed, if necessary, to enhance stability. Such measures may include, but may not necessarily be limited to, flattening of slopes or installation of surface or subsurface drains. In any case, water should not be allowed to flow uncontrolled over the top of any slopes. All buildings should be set back a distance at least equal to the height of the slope to avoid imposing any structural load on the face of the slope. All permanently exposed slopes should be seeded with a vegetative cover as quickly after I.. construction as is possible. The mat should comprise a deep-rooted, rapid-growth vegetation. • This cover will help to reduce the potential for surface erosion and will help enhance the stability of the surficial layer of soil. It might also be prudent.to use a pegged in-place geotechnical fabric to help hold the seed and mulch on the slope surface until such time as the root mat has an opportunity to germinate. • Rockeries 0 If the owner elects to use rockeries to protect the native cut slopes on the site, it should be understood they are not engineered retaining walls. Their construction is to a large extent an art not entirely controllable by engineering methods. Because of this, it is imperative that rockeries be constructed in a proper manner by contractors experienced in, and with a proven capability in, rockery construction. We have provided a set of Rockery Construction Guidelines for you and your contractor's use as Appendix C to this report. Earth Consultants, Inc. • Northbay Development Corporation E-4218-1 June 15, 1989 Page 9 I Site Drainage We do not expect the site groundwater levels will present any major construction related problems. However, two natural drainage swales are aligned east to west across the site. If buildings or fills are located over these swales, the swales should be rerouted to a suitable discharge, or a drainage pipe provided beneath the fills. Once the rerouting is completed, the swales should be backfilled with compacted fill in accordance to the recommendations provided in the Site Preparation section of this report. During the earthwork the site should be graded such that surface water is directed off the site. Water should not be allowed to stand in any area where buildings, slabs or pavements are to be constructed. During construction, loose surfaces should be sealed at night by compacting the surface to reduce the potential for moisture infiltration into the soils. Final site grades should allow for drainage away from the building foundations. We suggest that ( the ground be sloped at a gradient of 3 percent for a distance of at least ten feet away from the buildings except in areas that are to be paved. ( If seepage is encountered in foundation excavations during construction, we recommend your contractor slope the bottom of the excavation to one or more shallow sump pits. The collected water can then be pumped from these pits to a positive and permanent discharge, such as a nearby storm drain. Depending on the magnitude of such seepage, it may also be necessary to interconnect the shallow sump pits by a system of shallow connector trenches. If conventional spread footings are used, we recommend you install footing drains around the building perimeter. These drains should consist of a four-inch minimum diameter perforated or slotted rigid drain pipe laid at, or just below, the invert of the footing with a gradient L_ sufficient to initiate flow. The drain line should be bedded on, surrounded by, and covered with a free-draining washed rock, pea gravel, or other free-draining granular material. Once the drains are installed, with the exception of the upper twelve (12) inches, the excavation can be backfilled with a granular fill material. The surficial twelve (12) inches of fill should consist of compacted and relatively impermeable soil. It can be separated from the underlying more granular drainage material by a layer of building paper or visqueen. The surface should be sloped to drain away from the building wall. Alternatively, the surface can be sealed with asphalt or concrete paving. A typical detail is provided on Plate 11. Under no circumstances should roof downspout drain lines be connected to the footing drain system. All roof downspouts must be separately tightlined to discharge. We recommend you install sufficient cleanouts at strategic locations to allow for periodic maintenance of the footing drain and downspout tightline systems. Earth Consultants, Inc. Northbay Development Corporation E-4218-1 June 15, 1989 Page 10 - T We recommend the appropriate locations of subsurface drains, if needed, be established during grading operations by ECI's representative at which time the seepage areas, if present, may be more clearly defined. Pavement Areas The adequacy of site pavements is strictly related to the condition of the underlying subgrade. If this is inadequate, no matter what pavement section is constructed, settlement or movement of the subgrade will be reflected up through the paving. We recommend the subgrade be treated as described in the Site Preparation section of this report. Depending on the nature of the prepared subgrade at the time of construction, it may also be necessary to use a geotechnical fabric to separate pavement materials from the underlying subgrade and to help strengthen the pavement section. We have provided you with two alternative pavement sections for the lightly trafficked access and parking areas. • Two inches of Asphalt Concrete (AC) over four inches of Crushed Rock Base (CRB) material, or • two inches of AC over.three inches of Asphalt Treated Base (ATB) material. L LIMITATIONS f_` Our recommendations and conclusions are based on the site materials observed, selective laboratory testing and engineering analyses, the design information provided us by your - architect, and our experience and engineering judgement. The conclusions and recommendations are professional opinions derived in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by other members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions in this area. No warranty is expressed or implied. • The recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the test pits. Soil and groundwater conditions between the test pits may vary from those encountered. The nature and extent of variations between our exploratory locations may not become evident until construction. If variations then appear, ECI should be requested to L reevaluate the recommendations of this report and to modify or verify them in writing prior to proceeding with the construction. r . Earth Consultants, Inc. i Northbay Development Corporation E-4218-1 June 15, 1989 Page 11 . Additional Services We recommend that ECI be retained to perform a general review of the final design and specifications to verify that the earthwork and foundation recommendations have been properly interpreted and implemented in the design and in the construction specifications. We also recommend that ECI be retained •.to provide geotechnical services during construction. This is to observe compliance with the design concepts, specifications or recommendations and to allow design changes in the event subsurface conditions differ from those anticipated prior to the start of construction. We can not accept responsibility for the performance of the foundation or earthwork unless we are retained to review the j construction drawings and specifications, and to.provide construction observation. and testing I services. [ . • , . . ... . ., .,,:, , . _ . , : , . l . , . .• " . _ . . • _ • • __ __ • , , _ .__, Earth Consultants, Inc. • I j t APPENDIX A E-4218-1 i 1 FIELD EXPLORATION AND LABORATORY TESTING Our field exploration was performed on May 16, 1989. Subsurface conditions at the site were explored by excavating eight (8) test pits to a maximum depth of ten and one-half (10-1/2) feet below the existing grade. Approximate test pit locations were determined by pacing from property corners. Approximate test pit elevations were determined from a site plan provided by the Johnson Braund Design Group, Inc., dated May 11, 1989. The loca- tions and elevations of the test pits should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. These approximate locations are shown on the Test Pit Location Plan, Plate 2. The field exploration was continuously monitored by a geotechnical engineer from our firm who classified the soils encountered and maintained a log of each test pit, obtained representative samples, measured groundwater levels, and observed pertinent site features. All samples were visually classified in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System which is presented on Plate 3, Legend. Logs of the test pits are presented on Plates 4 through 7. The final logs represent our interpretations of the field logs and the results of the laboratory examination and tests of field samples. The stratification lines on the logs represent the approximate boundaries between soil types. In actuality, the transitions may f be more gradual. • The consistency of the soil was estimated based on the effort required to excavate the soil, the stability of the trench walls, and other factors. Representative soil samples were placed in closed containers and returned to our laboratory for further examination and testing. Visual classifications were supplemented by index tests on representative samples. Moisture determinations were performed on all samples. Results of moisture determinations, together with classifications, are shown on the test pit logs included in this report. The results of the sieve analyses are illustrated on Plates 8 and 9, :- Grain Size Analyses. • L f: _ - Earth Consultants, Inc. • 0 : I `.r•14 v '1EiZ.:' f'z > i -7<I I S• - A �i n I i w1 .`s+.a:;.�cy I t DKAD.1 I , aqI I �1 Isr fii . �._ • 1,.�tc/i�;%?c;\�m It,��11 < TG ® L" � sanlur•.• _Iy t •• •IE i f Z, •;;.frlikiftA,` / I`t i - 'SP"I'Nf A r011 f RENTON VILLASE►L ' T • T 1tl HF ST F ''•`%'i:,'S YAAKi. �\ a>! ,� .I m A..1( 11"1"'.: 1 • ISOTNST r sT 'A;G ,`.'tiy:i`..r.: '70• 'h7 ,®� ' +,\ N SIST Si S . :,�J•�'4•J•` lf•?l71'fA R, II�'�IIII� ... \.\» 1 Z • I ei 1 < OD Adr x • I �3• 1 IL y ' • 1 ,4 1 <.. w 0 N —I :6f 1� s. SIITX Si •- M ,.� s oo�'-,'pNRK11A . -: i1�� --�si i- .I SITE NTFH ■nr ii!":0...i:.4.:::;:...:1---ti..s.fo'Rnacsaeca.; t'TN T g/� �'r •i••••'. ,31 ''•'uliIl arATN ( E`40`� O I ~ '0 SI131Y 1MT" 1I •••.••ii•:• EVAN• :..41,. . '?•••••. {� 1ft 1 E rYAi��Qr• ar, i eb 1 4 JA%O.O•O•••i• • WI . < i . _.�a ! r a"' Fii""•e_'i i" E ■ 'TT •• yp Dior j s SIC i[NNI I.'•.:'.i I S 'I EL' `..r Ofr h /�*��� .t C• _ F s TH•ST'- - i ' aTN 1R 1,1. LsN _ _ s•�•0.,...•,...... ii� �V ',' ^ I ,,�1W � i "i�,'i _ i— aN f ♦ f�..�, _—J..1Z 66TiL— ♦�•�•i• is f� * ••••.!rIII /•L.wr_�� I 1 ., Tr C. r� �r E]1TN ST 6 >�•• I �v �I�.� •.•.•.•.•_•.•.•.• �:�. I SW Mil ST a a r q> I. a 1 �`4 I i I s mlr R ' d rTt,,"TN• 11 e �• N Ilil THE f}a Lu a._: I !A 'b^�1 ! g 'T." -- ET :.. C ININSt .f •-!t a--t; J 9 Mw i SE TOWN, 1 I. :.'J.' :-• ,'.,�.. . :•Ti14 1' .6%•:ii .�IYJ� L1. .watX T C f" T:'4. MT w .E : 1 +h's:j.:...: !'J. i I 5:,'".'.,.�. a ,ram • FTN S Ia 1 :I'-' `. 1•'^t'„ I U!/ 4,,..F ]I!T <w TE I ;<d : 26 ' _`. b 1 :?�,,'p 25 w": l I \ - •.T T;'� �1 ,. I. t`.''` eHR sr ar` / N., Rp 1 ET o ` ii 7a - k 1 rs::: .0 '�' 1 T M I NL I ¢ 1 ®- e .I•: Ti_ ..;-,a ,� I I ORFENIT c. L C r; .1,•: 0 I Si- • IMTX ST e ..+:.r;�,�{ :f1E CC axcts- I I `\ 1 fi COS- ATE �- I ';'}! L' g` Y.•` i�'}a`rt,' < .::1,� Via. \ rlr: ,f: S 1 1. • . .T ® i DST I T ,I 1 �,. SOS I i�, -;��'�i�'•'t1.,.�:, i I sum _.. I' , _ ' J _ �.I•. ..',"."•.. ... IT• 41XRLER S .I�TCn'•;r, '• � � �i, }I ...> I •' s • ■C06(MW'fD''VEIANObR ■ _— •' - — 1-I-— —— — —4 3 E 1']N —} —— SF.171N0 s -—__ —F °MTN .-CC I '- aj —is ?sue; ° -I S• S I711N ST s T.TN sT t � j 1! 7 Z I le I - a ,4111z © S . - 'sw 1 ele.ST r 'r� SE IMTN ST F '•I '[-�T,'a;...v.:,,. • :fi: .I.�.I p 1 i I W / \1 "1 Q \n 78TH . ?2'..`.:'+5' ,!e•-:.'::T SAW)1.!DR " 2 I " SW /IST ST - f177TH R 1 �Q I i i EN ST ,,".•. ,-' II.1"113 . VAI.IA• r3\TST • �� '/'..,.,: '-..__^y:,Aa„.1„ : ,, I `1' Q0131 �lA y 1 ! • MOS/■. a i N B E >ii •t::';1: !':.'i: %) I n s J 'z SE inTI.R N •: _ :moo <� t •.I l (..: X�7,•�T - y�.I.1�_ A ti $W Q ; V L1 S[IIOIN 1l�lOM L .w v 'I r''L•,' •.:'.'<i�R 3 o,;i:, �i©w t.•r�si.:.IF;4.. s so 11BDTH T di t T✓f SE IS STST- pi 0 •• 1` l',a: :1', �, IEFND I::I• .I;:.+.,'�'.. f, .::J:-4�'IV Qa�F MB pi ;7" �:1:-'d 4',r-4, : •,'r•ns S =7::;!' ! :0,-!-�!FR,_- 't': _1_ t I 0 'E,:;35l • IQ '6 -_ w3g`',I: .t'�•.t- I,<;it: 7' - --, n I''. or'ev; T ..:.1. :.'° ,,..�'. .,r4 31 1— 32 'r:;.f.: f. -.I•...a. ?,, a,.lir?`i;.R .,i{-.•`:i,,.. • f w d -'I' :,,-;a.;'•y :7,:. ^,t;. ;s,a _1 , SEII6TH ti sr 1i.f'gY..f� .o '7.. ,: I.i„ _ mac•^ .P .7 ;;!L. i 1 .T. _ I `� �. .ram:;. - ,.. .-i,.,� •.I 1 SE 117TH 3T r sr 61TN' [..._ ..� ,I a •• IkStESTN ST. t :'�•` . 1 nTN ST,• . .,.„„-'1 u,,11l I la ST rZQ ® ,.�^ •' i ST 1.1 j, .'i SistIWN STew,. r. fliffirtLSS-.,.'•.N J I Io �= SE 190ni_gSftElNl- • u 1 • w 7 �1 i :''f�'� �(,:::7's. SE(90TNT SE 1PoT PL ii I — _ t— _ Is7ND sT- s tSt.—r--— _ • I —. .'-''� ` _—_ o = _—- ` _ _' 1■..•sT r- • -slSlmlD::r �� �Ism-= /� rrZ 1 y-a_ I a ` I a 8 Q ' :`: 1 E IEETN r•-,:• ly'.iY':;^�'w:'' I::`• 11 �T,:l^ mS �. � O9/TN ST _ 1r1.ST: - Sr .,:•7, 4..<•.,w<'' L. t I SE 1!•it.f SE t9/T • i' �'�' I - S 196TN ST ... . :us .".i::rJ,.:::. '',1c.-• •w • - n 62 SE 196TH ST • ~ TkI>. i .. .� a•.:.-r•'; '1' i �yyt111'•��r�///��JJJ> �, a �W w FI< , • '�}}�31�� :. 7 �gST .: $T - x zv'.i x .. ¢y P. 2 .�"" '.':a 6.;211. ',L_i '1' H ST ' I 1 i i. i4 711 5J •'sr, F IjT R'y l I • y"'a' .<>I' °11.• 1 ' s f 2DDTH i$T iIJ LJ F 1:nr,st I'" �I I SDEINC AFRO I,'ACE CENTER ' • :. .,,. .H }• •><1• ll• I i� F ICF 71HI1 H Si 1 0 �1�J Reference I j King County/ Map 41 By Thomas Brothers Maps I+ Dated 1988 l- ./i! '1�@ �A\ Vicinity Map Earth Consultants Inc.. City Lights Apartments 014 / ill U•c7tlrhnkal Engineers.Cxrobglsfs&Environmental Scientists Renton, Washington Proj. No. 4218-1 I Drwn. GLS I Date May 189 Checked KL I Date 5/18/89 I Plate 1 • 410 3E0 370 Property Line!--- \ I\ ( \I _ .____._.____).--,,----=-,---_.___a__ __ 410 r- 400 .fit \ _ l l2 390 1P-7 1 370 Ni r01171 b-. �iI 1 I i Existing 380 �, `� 'r _ r I Access Road f t r I 1 I r- lise-", ) i 1 3 1 I I Approximate Scale 360 1 - --- l- 1 _ I. — ' r 1 =1P-5 i 37o C 25 50 ICOft. Limits of Unexplored , 1 1/Area -•y r i91111 . 1P-8 r ft."( 1 I gill ,. L i 'pi,i dia - 36' ® -fP-I Approximate Location of 350 �� 7P 2 I ', 1 ECI Test Pit, Proj. No. ®,lP-4 � :r:: ' May1989 L, \_______n____ d Building i z_. Sao W ; 3 BENs�� R� • iii 330 ; 330 ....-----} . • i , I Reference : Proj. No. 88-52 r . Site Plan By JohnsonBraund Design Group, Inc. Doted 5/11/89 di1. , . 4 \ • Test Pit Location Plan HO ��"� ,�: Earth Consultants Inc. City Lights Apartments L . \d1 lti,1t (,enurlmkaI.nglnrtrs.(:cokralsts&EnvironmentalScirnlLsls Renton; Washington _ _ . Proj No. 4218-I I Drwn. GLS I Date May '89 Checked KL I Date 5/18/89 I Plate 2 I MAJOR DIVISIONS GRAPH LETTER TYPICAL DESCRIPTION SYMBOL SYMBOL oi• °•°4 0 -°0 GW Well-Graded Gravels,Gravel-Sand • Gravel '.00 0:0'°°°o*.,----- Gravelly gW Mixtures, Little Or No Fines And Clean Gravels °a ° - 0 (little or no fines) ' :9: :e: :•: : GP ---- Poorly-Graded Gravels.Gravel- Coarse Soils ♦ • ♦ ' ♦ ' ♦/gp Sand Mixtures, Little Or No Fines Grained - '•' AP- -*' Soils More Than ! .111,'I e GM Silty Gravels,Gravel-Sand- 50% Coarse r. I u I I•I I Gravels With I I i t .I gm Silt Mixtures Fraction Fines(appreciable Retained On amount of fines) G GC Clayey Gravels,Gravel-Sand- No.4 Sieve / gc Clay Mixtures Sand o o°o°°00000 SW Well-Graded Sands, Gravelly ° °0 00 0 o SW Sands, Little Or No Fines And Clean Sand ° 00 og• a - Sandy (little or no fines) More Than Soils SP Poorly-Graded Sands, Gravelly 50% Material Sp Sands, Little Or No Fines Larger Than More Than et f• •••'�•i•...! No.200 Sieve 50% Coarse • ••• SM Silty Sands, Sand-Silt Mixtures Size Fraction Sands With •,"i'::: SM Fines(appreciable ,, Passing No.4 amount of fines) Sieve �_fly SC Clayey Sands, Sand Clay Mixtures SC ML Inorganic Silts&Very Fine Sands,Rock Floursilty- ml Clayey Fine Sands;Clayey Silts w/.Slight Plasticity Fine Silts Liquid Limit Inorganic Clays Oi Low To Medium Plasticity, Grained And Less Than 50 j�f CL CI Gravelly Clays, Sandy Clays, Silty Clays, Lean Soils Clays Organic Silts And Organic • I I I I I I OL OI Silty Clays Of Low Plasticity I MH Inorganic Silts, Micaceous Or Diatomaceous Fine More Than mh Sand Or Silty Soils 50% Material Silts Liquid Limit 1 Smaller Than And CH Inorganic Clays. Of High No.200 Sieve Clays Greater Than 50 1 Ch Plasticity, Fat'Clays. Size • /,�1��//��' OH Organic Clays Of Medium To High ' /////// Oh 'Plasticity, Organic Silts / //„„ _ Highly Organic Soils ` _.& .. PT Peat, Humus, Swamp Soils pt With High Organic Contents Topsoil •" Humus And Duff Layer Fill Highly Variable Constituents The Discussion In The Text Of This Report Is Necessary For A Proper Understanding Of The Nature Of The Material Presented In The Attached Logs ' Notes: i'. Dual symbols are used to indicate borderline soil classification.Upper case letter symbols designate sample classifications based upon lab— oratory testing; lower case letter symbols designate classifications not .. verified by laboratory testing. . I 2-0.D. SPLIT SPOON SAMPLER C TORVANE READING, tsf Tr 2.4"I.D. RING SAMPLER OR qu PENETROMETER READING,tsf 1L SHELBY TUBE SAMPLER • P SAMPLER PUSHED W MOISTURE, percent of dry weight * SAMPLE NOT RECOVERED • pcf DRY DENSITY,pounds per cubic ft. • 2 WATER LEVEL (DATE) LL LIQUID LIMIT,percent 1 WATER OBSERVATION WELL PI PLASTIC INDEX ..V$ Earth LEGEND Consultants Inc. Geotechnical Engineering and Geology Proj. No.4218-1I Date May'89 I Plate 3 ,S TEST PIT NO. _l____ Logged By KAL r— Date 5-13-89 Elev. 369'±* • Depth • W (ft.) USCS • Soil Description (%) 0 :i:Mi:1: SM Gray silty SAND, moist, medium dense 5 ii{ l:f:: Becomes dense at 5 feet 12 is #.. ":i3i ff == Becomes very dense at 6.5 feet -: #:€:,: Glacial till 12 Test pit terminated at 7.5 feet below existing grade. • • No groundwater seepage encountered during excavation. - • 10 • * Test pit elevations taken off of Topographic survey provided by Johnson Braund Design Group, Inc. , dated - May 11, 1989. 15 • Logged By KAL Date 5-13-89 TEST PIT NO. [ 0 •••:::f mil Red silty SAND, damp, medium dense 5 :-:' �.{ SM Reddish brown silty sandy GRAVEL, moist, dense ( 1. . heavily mottled seams and pockets of sandy silt. ''` - cobbles at 6.0 feet 10 ,::..., :: ':" sm Becomes very dense at 9.0 feet • -{::-•;•;• 10 --1.:••' Gray silty SAND, moist, very dense { 10 #:=:}.f:. Glacial Till 8 _ Test pit terminated at 10.5 feet below•existing grade. • No groundwater seepage encountered during excavation. - 15 _. Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests,analysis,and judgement.They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of information presented on this log. • TEST PIT LOGS . . ; I - Earth CITY LIGHTS APARTMENTS Consultants Inc. RENTON, WASHINGTON 1 . Geotechnical Engineering and Geology IDate Proj. No.4218-1 May'89 I Plate 4 l_ TEST PIT NO. Logged By KAL r Date 5-13-89 Elev. 3591±* Depth • W (ft.) USCS Soil Description (%) 0 *ft sm Dark brown silty SAND, moist, loose • 13 sp Gray gravelly SAND, moist, wet, dense ''Y••:':i 11-'' sm GraY siltYSAD. damp, very dense Glacial till 5 9 Test pit terminated at 6.5 feet below existing grade. _ No groundwater seepage encountered during excavation. 10 • • • 15 • L Logged By KAL • 345'±* Date-13-89 TEST PIT NO. Elev. 1 0 ## :: sm Brown silty SAND, moist, medium dense 13 f $: SM Gray silty SAND, damp, very dense Glacial Till 10 5 — Test pit terminated at 4.5 feet below existing grade. _ No groundwater seepage encountered during excavation. 10 —, L 15 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests,analysis,and judgement.They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of information presented on this log. TEST PIT LOGS Earth CITY LIGHT APARTMENTS Consultants Inc. RENTON, WASHINGTON Geotechnical Engineering and Geology • Proj. No. 4218-1 I Date May'89 !Plate 5 TEST PIT NO. Logged By KAL Date _ 5-13-89 _ Elev. 363'±* Depth W • (ft.) USCS Soil Description (%) sm Reddish brown silty SAND, moist, medium dense mottled 12 - becomes dense @ 4.0 feet 5 — .:::: --- 11 "�:;�r sin Gray silty SAND, damp, very dense, glacial till Test pit terminated at 6.5..feet below existing grade. No groundwater seepage encountered during excavation. 10 — . • 15 • • Logged By KAL ±* [. Date 5-13-89 TEST PIT NO. Elev. 373 • 0 = sm Brown silty SAND, moist, loose to medium dense :• 7 SM Reddish brown silty sandy GRAVEL, damp, . very dense 13 5 - becomes gray @ 6.0 feet, very dense, glacial till 10 •- Test pit terminated at 6.5 feet below existing grade. - _ No groundwater seepage encountered during excavation. • 10 — • 15 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests,analysis,and judgement.They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility tor the use or interpretation by others of information presented on this log. • TEST PIT LOGS Earth � CITY LIGHT APARTMENTS . 41 Consultants Inc. RENTON, WASHINGTON • • • Geotechnical Engineering and Geology Proj. No. 4218-1 [ Date May'89 IPlate 6 _ . i TEST PIT NO. _i___. _ Logged By KAL • 7 Date 5-13-89 ' Elev. 383 1-±* Depth W (ft.) USCS Soil Description • (%) 0 -- '-' 1 sm Reddish brown silty SAND, damp, medium dense 9 n,...t. SM Light brown silty SAND, moist, dense 13 5 ::,.::.„ • :::;::•:. . • • ••• _Pi. - cobbles @ 6.5 feet • ::: - mottled seams @ 7.0 feet- 11 sm Light reddish brown SAND with silt, moist to wet 11 dense < • 10 ----M ' - becomes wet @ 10.0 feet 10 - • Test pit termianted at 10.5 feet below existinggrade. - • Moderate groundwater seepage encountered at 10.0 feet - during excavation. - . • • 15 . . • J Logged By KAT-' 5-13-89 Date TEST PIT NO. ___a___ Elev.--.3631±* -- 1._. 0 jli.--c•-•T .. :::: SM Light brown silty SAND, moist, medium dense • heavily mottled 14 • --,--::5*,•: ' - gravel @ 3.0 feet and dense 15 5 *-------------- • _...:::,:-.• ..r...• gp Gray silty SAND, damp, very dense, slightly -.. a mottled, glacial till • 13 - - Test pit terminated at 6.5 feet below existing grade. • - No groundwater seepage encountered during excavation. • . • - L 10 — • 1 ., —._ • . • L 15 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests,analysis,and judgement.They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of • information presented on this log. L . . TEST PIT LOGS 1 .11 ' .: Earth CITY LIGHTS APARTMENTS - Ili' .•.!:ii' Consultants Inc. RENTON WASHINGTON • c. •.• Geotechnical Engineering and Geology ._: Proj. No.4218-1 I Date may'89 I Plate 7 • • APPENDIX B E-4218-1 LABORATORY TESTING General We conducted laboratory tests on several representative soil samples to verify or modify the field soil classification of the units encountered and to evaluate the material's general physical properties and engineering characteristics. A brief description of each of the tests performed for this study is provided below. The results of laboratory tests performed on specific samples are provided either at the appropriate sample depth on the individual boring log or on a separate data sheet contained in this Appendix. However, it is important to note that these test results may not accurately represent the overall in-situ soil conditions. All of our recommendations are based on our interpretation of these test results and their use in guiding our engineering judgement. Earth Consultants, Inc. (ECI) cannot be responsible for the interpretation of these data by others. In accordance with our Standard Fee Schedule and General Conditions, the soil samples for this project will be discarded after a period of thirty (30) days following completion of this report unless we are otherwise directed in writing. Soil Classification As mentioned earlier, all soil samples are visually examined in the field by our representative at the time they are obtained. They are subsequently packaged and returned to our Bellevue office where they are independently reexamined by one of our engineers and the original description is verified or modified, as necessary. With the help of information obtained from classification tests, the samples are described in general accordance with the Unified Classification System, ASTM Test Method D-2487-83. The resulting descriptions are provided at the appropriate sample location on the individual test pit log and are qualitative only. The attached Soil Classification/Legend, Plate 3, provides pictorial symbols that match the written descriptions. Moisture Density Moisture content tests were performed on all samples obtained from the test pits. The purpose of these tests is to approximately ascertain the in-place moisture content. The moisture content is determined in general accordance with ASTM Test.Method D-2216-80. The results of these tests are presented at the appropriate sample depth on the boring logs. • Earth Consultants, Inc. Northbay Development Corporation E-4218-1 June 15, 1989 Page 14 Appendix B - Laboratory Testing E-4218-1 Page .2. Particle Size Analysis Detailed grain size analyses were conducted on several of the shallow soil samples to determine the size distribution of the sampled soil. The information gained from this analysis allows us to provide a detailed description and classification of the in-place materials. In turn, this helps us to understand how the in-place materials will react when excavated and reworked during the construction effort. The results are presented on Plates 8 and 9, and classification symbols are provided as part of the appropriate individual sample descriptions on the test pit logs. • • Earth Consultants, Inc. SIEVE ANALYSIS HYDROMETER ANALYSIS SIZE OF OPENING IN INCHES I NUMBER OF MESH PER INCH,U.S.STANDARD GRAIN SIZE IN MM NN v �\p N p 0 O O O 0 0 O p p 0 • M N , CO O C. O O CD a M N r- .-c7 M Tt OD'' r N M 'Cr ID CO CO'- N O O O O p 0 O O O O O 100 0 411111141 �a'� 90 10 • A • ® m so zo v • [m � m ti.H n m 70 • 30 n a Itt z m 7. '11 60 Nh - 40 -I eo m �/ I O Iro a 50 \ .• • / 50 X O 03 N a1� -< ......Am '• 0 2 m 40 t�Q -IDso 03 130 \ 70 m- -- 'o L C)_ o 20 N 80 .-1 z **'`A, 0 ,A 10 90 N H - - I H I I I I I I I I- I 111 I I I I I II I I I I I I III I 100 Hy O O O . 0 . . . 0 O 00 c0 V Cs, N 0 CO CD a CON 00 cD V PI N .- CO CD a CI ' OD c0 sf M N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O z y "I N GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS . 0 0 o O O 0 Z Z COARSE ) FINE COARSE I MEDIUM I FINE CD . x COBBLES GRAVEL SAND FINES 3 En m / RI t) d D Boring or DEPTH Moisture co Z y > KEY Test Pit No. (ft.) USCS DESCRIPTION Content (%) LL PL '< Hcn �, z z m TP-1 3.5 SM Silty SAND 16 m to �___ TP-2 5 SM Silty SAND with gravel 10 CO •••,,.•.• TP-4 4 SM Silty SAND • 10 SIEVE ANALYSIS HYDROMETER ANALYSIS i SIZE OF OPENING IN INCHES 1 NUMBER OF MESH PER INCH, U.S.STANDARD GRAIN SIZE IN MM , N N a v m m O O 00 00 O 0 O O O 0 O O O O O 0 �--% 100O st V) N .- .-c)• (9 .-� ct OD F- N M 4 S�O W o N O O O 0 Arifir 4. (Z;;) • */�"° � 90 ALA`` 10 t ® tri m so 20 5 h .v a m m V9 m 70 \ - 30 21 "g Pe, z m rot�' 40 —Ia0rt, 'i1 60 � � z - 2,* m O a 14' m 50 50 09 m g Rffli \ ._ _ r * 40 s° W 'n m -< G) 30 - 70 m 0 11 = O. 20 - 80 z _ p 10 90 N n co H I III I I I I I [III I i I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 I_I 100 0 H y O O O O O O O O O CO CD a CI N .- CO lD st M N ... co CD a Cl N CO CD Cl N I- til ,-473 O O O CO CD a CI N .-- ' CI' O O O O O O O O O O O "� z D CI N GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS • O O O O• 0• O O H Z COARSE FINE COARSE MEDIUM FINE CD z x Cn COBBLES GRAVEL • SAND FINES a '-< M 'V Z Boring or DEPTH Moisture o3 z 73 KEY Test Pit No. (ft.) USCS DESCRIPTION Content(%) LL PL y '....n. z z Cl) -vTP-6 4 SM Silty SAND 13 w 0 '- CD A___ TP-7 4 ML Sandy SILT 13 ko rt . • - •LE SCHEMATIC ONLY NOT TO NOT A CONSTRUCTION DRAWING 77. . • .} . ' • . D•iu= IH = l • • • 171 o O'•0.' ;9. ••o• ''•..•• .0 'o /. ':••• •o••:;e;.o:._•o. cc �•• •�. ..�.'p•.' ?gy • o . '0 • • •• • Hain 4 1 ft. min. o . •' - . IIfl o.••,o 1ft.min. Compacted Subgrade t • LEGEND Surface seal; native soil or other low permeability material. - e•.:........ Free draining, organic free granular material with a maximum 1 •'• =•0 size of 3 inches, containing no more than 5 percent fines (silt and clay size particles passing the No. 200 mesh sieve]. r Impermeable visqueen barrier or other impermeable material _ approved by geotechnical engineer. Weephole and drainage pocket as described below. ......--0 O Drain pipe; perforated or slotted rigid PVC pipe laid with perforations or slots facing down; tight jointed; with a • positive gradient. Do not use flexible corrugated plastic pipe. brain line should be bedded on. and surrounded with free draining 1 inch minus rock or pea gravel, as desired. The drainrock may be encapsulated with a geo- technical drainage fabric at the engineers discretion. NOTES: i • For free standing walls, weepholes may be used. Surround weep- ' holes with no less than 18 inches of 1 inch minus rock. I, RETAINING WALL DRAINAGE AND BACKFILL r Earth Consultants Inc. CITY LIGHTS APARTMENTS Consulting Engineers,Geologists RENTON WASHINGTON U Environmental Scientists Proj. No. 4218-1 , Drwn. GLS 1 Date May'89 Checked KAL ' Dated May'89 I Plate 10 1 SCHEMATIC ONLY - NOT TO SCALE NOT A CONSTRUCTION DRAWING to% SLOPE TO DRAIN 1 ,13 ao • •° ° o ° o ° 0 6 inc h min o 0 O O O 0 O p' . •.• a 18 inch min. ®,D� ; :�j.o•'._ e'' • ° ° 4 inch min. ° oo ° , diameter � :p: •; ': ••. 0 o•°.°o° . O ;°p ' o. ° •• 0 1 • ° ',• °• •, ,• j : 1 2 inch min. 2 inch min./ 4 inch max. 12 inch min. LEGEND ; ::;a .:,4 Surface seal; native soil or other low permeability material. Gravel backfill for walls; WDOT Standard Specifications, Section 9-03. 12121 , or Fine Aggregate for Portland Cement Concrete ; Section 9-03.1121. O Drain pipe; perforated or slotted rigid PVC pipe laid with perforations or slots facing down; tight jointed ; with a positive gradient. Do not use flexible corrugated plastic pipe. Do not tie building downspout drains into footing lines. — — — Impermeable visqeen barrier or other impermeable material approved by Geotechnical Engineer. I1 TYPICAL FOOTING SUBDRAIN DETAIL Earth , ., Consultants Inc. CITY LIGHTS APARTMENTS ,• Consulting Engineers,Geologists RENTON, WASHINGTON • � U Environmental Scien ' Proj. No. 4218-1 I Drwn. GLS Date May'89 Checked KAL Dated May'89 Plate 11 DISTRIBUTION E-4218-1 4 Copies Northbay Development Corporation 633 North Mildred, Suite G Tacoma, Washington 98406 Attention: John Miller 1 Copy Johnson Braund Design Group, Inc. 304 Main Avenue South, Suite 200 Renton, Washington 98055 Attention: Mel Easter Earth Consultants, Inc. J UI Y Cb '07 1 1•U'7 UG 'r 1 F•3/4 • CERTIFICATION OF NOTIFICATION OF ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS/SITE PLAN * * *FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY* * * PROJECT TITLE: G L IkAs A--t-s . APPLICANT: Ncv -4, 'l�cu� rY,�x APPLICATION NUMBER: SFA_(•)5p)-7 The following is a list of adjacent property owners and their addresses. A notification of the pending site plan application shall be sent to these individuals as prescribed by Renton City Code. Chapter 7 Section 38 of Title IV (Building Regulations) of Ordinance No. 1628 relating to site plan approval. ASSESSOR'S NAME ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER **Please find attached a list of all adjacent property owners/site plan. • PLANNING DIVISIoN CITY OF RENTcjp JUL 0 31989 :•RECEIVED LName FName Street City State Zip Parcel Hughes Janice M 10203 47th Ave SW 308 A Seattle WA 98146 073780-0110 Hud 561-375431-234 Attn: Prop Dispos Brnch 1321 2nd Ave 04 Renton WA 98055 073780-0420 ' Duncan Douglas P 1425 S Puget Dr 0308 Renton WA 98055 073780-0430 ( Renton School Dist 403' 435 Main Ave Renton WA 98055 292305-9061 First Presby Church 2640 Benson Rd S 04480-001 Renton WA 98055 292305-9102 First City Develop. Corp. 777 Hornby St 17th Floor Vancouver BC V6Z 1 292305-9131 ( Mudie Jennifer M 1425 S Puget Dr 0101 Renton WA 98055 073780-0010 Culjak Anthony 1425 S Puget Dr #1102 Renton WA 98055 073780-0020 Fata Peter M 1425 S Puget Dr 0103 Renton WA 98055 073780-0030 ( Barlow Geraldine S PO Box 15726 Salt Lake City UT 84115 073780-0040 Barnwell Richard E 15212 44th Ave E Tacoma WA 98446 073780-0050 Hiland Hills Associates 3100 Evergreen Pt Rd Bellevue WA 98004 073780-0060 ( Richert Todd & Michele M 1425 S Puget Dr 0107 Renton WA 98055 073780-0070 Greaves Barbara C 1425 S Puget Dr 0108 Renton WA 98055 073780-0080 Eshenour Robert W 1425 S Puget Dr 0109 Renton WA 98055 073780-0090 Rice Robert L 4625 South 2300 East Suite 201 Salt Lake City UT 84115 073780-0100 Larsen Gordon P & Ramona S 14633 245th Ave SE Issaquah WA 98027 073780-0120 Greer Michael J 1425 S Puget Dr 0113 Renton - WA 98055 073780-0130 ( Wilson Thomas Lee PO Box 88534 Tukwila WA 9818E 073780-0140 Lawrence V Arlene 1425 S Puget Dr 0115 Renton WA 98055 073780-0150 Duerst Eric 1425 S Puget Dr 0116 Renton WA 98055 073780-0160 ( Ehrhardt Thomas C 507 3rd Ave 0854 Seattle WA 98104 073780-0170 Hower Jane W 1425 S Puget Dr 0118 Renton WA 98055 073780-0180 Larsen Gordon P 14633 245th Ave SE Issaquah WA 98027 073780-0190 Oliver Margaret L 1425 S Puget Dr 0201 Renton WA 96055 073780-0200 Baker Richard E & Rita C 1425 S Puget Dr 0202 Renton WA 98055 073780-0210 Baker Drostan H 1425 S Puget Dr 0203 Renton WA 98055 073780-0220 Multivest Ltd 11056 Main St 0110 Bellevue WA 98004 073780-0230 Sack June K 1425 S Puget Dr 0205 Renton WA 98055 073780-0240 Asnicar Wealthy 1425 S Puget Dr 0206 Renton WA 98055 073780-0250 ( Seahurst Investment Corp A WA. Corporation 2050 112th Ave NE Renton WA 98055 073780-0260 1 Clayton John L MD FACS 2225 Bryan Circle Salt Lake City UT 84108 073780-0270 • Aramaki 'Marvin D 1425 S Puget Dr 0209 Renton WA 98055 073780-0280 Lee Steven E 29129 46th P1 S Auburn WA 98002 073780-0290 1 Shauls Warren R Etal 1425 S Puget Dr 0211 Renton WA 98055 073780-0300 Sylvan Lonnie & Carmella 5032 Bowen P1 S Seattle WA 98118 073780-0310 McKnight Albert W & Annie Hud 8827 144th P1 Bothell WA 98021 073780-0320 t Chan K _Walt 12025 12th Ave NE $18 Seattle WA 98125 073780-0330 East River Savings Bank 277 North Ave New Rochelle NY 10801 073780-0340 ( Rogers Jeffrey W 1425 S Puget Dr 0216 Renton WA 98055 073780-0350 i Larsen Gordon P & Ramona S 14633 245th Ave SE Issaquah WA 98027 073780-0360 Korda Michael J 1425 S Puget Dr 0302 Renton WA 98055 073780-0370 & Ehle John F 71 Shorecrest Ct Kale Pt Port Townsend WA 073780-0380 ; Heilman Terry L ET AL 2716 1st Ave N Seattle WA 98109 073780-0390 Carlson J J & Hughes R E 1425 S Puget Dr 0305 Renton WA 98055 073780-0400 Olafson Richard A & Barbara 1425 S Puget Dr 0306 Renton WA 98055 073780-0410 1 Talman Home Mortgage Corp 4242 N Harlem Ave Nooridge IL 60634 073780-0440 • Kinsey Kein D 1425 S Puget Dr 0310 Renton WA 98055 073780-0450 Grossman Peter 1425 S Puget Dr 0311 Renton WA 98055 073780-0460 ( Walberg Terry G & Suy T 1425 S Puget Dr 0312 Renton WA 98055 073780-0470 ' Hanson Dolores E 1425 S Puget Dr 0313 Renton WA 98055 073780-0480 Kent David W 4629 121st Ave SE Bellevue WA 98004 073780-0490 ( Bethers Ray & Gloria R 1425 S Puget Rd 0315 Renton WA 98055 073780-0500 Edwards B A 1425 S Puget Dr 0316 Renton WA 98055 073780-0510 C Hjelmaa Barbara C 1425 S Puget Dr A-1 Renton WA 98055 073780-0520 ( • - Talman Home Fed Sav & L 4242 North Harlem Ave Chicago IL 60634 073780-0530 Otto Ardith L 1425 S Puget Dr IIA-3 Renton WA 98055 073780-0540 East River Savings Bank 277 North Ave New Rochelle NY 10801 073780-0550 r Thomas Darrol 0 & Jean C 1425 S Puget Dr IIA-5 Renton WA 98055 073780-0560 - Devones Richard 1425 S Puget Dr 1$A6 Renton WA 98055 073780-0570 LName FName Street City State Zip Parcel ( Bressler Mary R 1425 S Puget Dr 081 Renton WA 98055 073780-0580 ( Reetz Sandra J 1425 S Puget Dr #B-2 Renton WA 98055 073780-0590 Cornwall Elizabeth L 7624 128th P1 NE Kirkland WA 98033 073780-0600 r Vold I James W 1425 S Puget Dr B-4 Renton WA 98055 073780-0610 ( Mcharg Barbara Jean 1425 S Puget Dr #B5 Renton WA 98055 073780-0620 Dornfeld Gerald M 17003 156th Ave SE Renton WA 98058 073780-0630 ( Glessner Marian E 1425 S Puget Dr #C-1 Renton WA 98055 073780-0640 ( Sipe Dana S 1425 S Puget Dr 0C-2 Renton WA 98055 073780-0650 Title Ins Agency of Utah 376 E 400th S Suite #306 Salt Lake City UT 84115 073780-0660 Williams C Mark & Elaine Mari 6113 South Ryan St Seattle WA 98178 073780-0670 Pioneer Fed Savings Bank PO Box M Lynnwood WA 98046 073780-0680 Larsen Gordon P & Ramona S 14633 245th Ave SE Issaquah WA 98027 073780-0690 { Lind Jerry 1425 S Puget Dr #D-1 Renton WA 98055 073780-0700 ( Goss Verneva 1425 S Puget Dr #D-2 Renton WA 98055 073780-0710 Ball Millie F 2436 S Angeline Seattle WA 98108 073780-0720 Keller Carole A 1425 S Puget Dr #D4 Renton WA 98055 073780-0730 Gardner R J & Hutchins M S 1425 S Puget Dr #D-5 Renton WA 98055 073780-0740 MacFarlane Grant Jr. 460 South Tenth East , A300 Salt Lake City UT 84115 073780-0750 Merlino Daniel J 1425 S Puget Dr #E-1 Renton WA 98055 073780-0760 Janke Leroy M & Jeanette 1425 S Puget Dr #E-2 Renton WA 98055 073780-0770 Baker Drostan H 115 E 16th St Idaho Falls ID 83401 073780-0780 Kim Sophia Y 1425 S Puget Dr #E-4 Renton WA 98055 073780-0790 Lord Robert C 1425 S Puget Dr #E-5 Renton WA 98055 073780-0800 Parker C L & Terrell E C 12408 NE 3rd P1 Bellevue WA 98005 073780-0810 Crocker Robb 1425 S Puget Dr #F1 Renton WA 98055 073780-0820 ( Jackson Trent G 1425 S Puget Dr F-2 Renton WA 98055 073780-0830 Gordon Keith A 314 I Ave _ Snohomish WA 98290 073780-0840 Hunter Claudia M 1425 S Puget Dr #F-4 Renton WA 98055 073780-0850 Tonda Oliver E & Madeline M 1664 Palisades Dr Pac. Palisades CA 9027 073780-0860 Ouintinskie John J Jr 1425 S Puget Dr #F-6 Renton WA 98055 073780-0870 Beck Steven A & Debra Ann 17233 140th SE 01 Renton WA 98055 073780-0880 ( Gorman Donald J 1425 S Puget Dr #G-2 Renton WA 98055 073780-0890 Walker - Evella A 1425 S Puget Dr G-3 Renton WA 98055 073780-0900 Karol Frances M 1425 S Puget Dr #G-4 Renton WA 98055 073760-0910 ( Rak Helena 1425 S Puget Dr #G-5 Renton WA 98055 073780-0920 Niles Nancy 1425 S Puget Dr #G-6 Renton WA 98055 073780-0930 Marrero Osvaldo 1425 S Puget Dr #H-1 Renton WA 98055 073780-0940 ( Scott Gregory 0 1425 S Puget Dr #H-2 Renton WA 98055 073780-0950 Calagiu Sotir 1425 S Puget Dr #H-3 Renton WA 98055 073780-0960 Larsen Gorden P & Ramona S 14633 245th Ave SE Issaquah WA 98027 073780-0970 ( ( Kramer Stephen A 1425 S Puget Dr H-5 Renton WA 98055 073780-0980 Parks Richard G 1425 S Puget Dr #H-6 Renton WA 98055 073780-0990 i Arnold Robert E ETAL 10880 Dixon Dr S Seattle WA 98178 073780-1000 ( Kyne Michael David 1425 S Puget Dr 012 Renton WA 98055 073780-1010 Gracey R David 1425 S Puget Dr #I-3 Renton WA 98055 073780-1020 Toms Douglas W 3032 McCormick SE Olympia WA 98501 073780-1030 ( ( McCarthey Douglas R 1425 S Puget Dr 01-5 Renton WA 98055 073780-1040 Holgate John H 1425 S Puget Dr Al-6 Renton WA 98055 073780-1050 Stephens George M 1425 S Puget Dr #3-1 Renton WA 98055 073780-1060 ( ( Cooper Jerry E & Lorna J 1425 S Puget Dr 41J-3 Renton WA 98055 073780-1070 Buklow George J 1438 S 263rd P1 Kent WA 98032 073780-1080 Seahurst Investment Corp A Washington Corporation 2050 112th Ave NE Renton WA 98055 073780-1090 ( ( Halls Michelle J 1425 S Puget Dr #K-6 Renton WA 98055 073780-1100 Ellertson Keith 376 E 400th Salt Lake City UT 84115 073780-1110 ( Ray Jo Anna 1425 S Puget Dr #L-2 Renton WA 98055 073780-1120 Cummins B C 6210 S 153rd 06 Seattle WA 98188 073780-1130 Doherty Daniel J 1425 S Puget Dr L-4 Renton WA 98055 073780-1140 Gardner John N 492 West 700 South Orem Ut 84058 073780-1150 ( Privette Robert W & Vivian 1425 S Puget Dr #L-6 Renton WA 98055 073780-1160 Ehrhardt Thomas C 507 3rd Ave #854 Seattle WA 98104 073780-1170 LName FName Street City State Zip Parcel Cummings Diane Lynn 1425 S Puget Dr #M-2 Renton WA 98055 073780-1180 Smith Walter V & Dorothy J 1425 S Puget Dr M-3 Renton WA 98055 073780-1190 East River Savings Bank 277 North Ave New Rochelle NY 10801 073780-1200 ( Vander , Sanden George 1425 S Puget Dr M-5 Renton WA 98055 073780-1210 ; Gregory Dana S 12244 77th Ave S Seattle WA 98178 073780-1220 Best James S 1425 S Puget Dr N-1 Renton WA 98055 073780-1230 Klein Richard J & Moira 1425 S Puget Dr #N-3 Renton WA 98055 073780-1240 Mozzone Donna L • 1425 S Puget Dr #N-5 Renton WA 98055 073780-1250 Dewell Bertram W 1425 S Puget Dr 0-1 Renton WA 98055 073780-1260 ( Hiland Hills Associates 3100 Evergreen Pt Rd Bellevue WA 98004 073780-1270 Nagel Maxine M 1425 S Puget Dr 00-3 Renton WA 98055 073780-1280 Bliss Thomas C & Maxine M 1425 S Puget Dr #0-4 Renton WA 98055 073780-1290 ( Abdeljabbar Abdelfattah & San 1425 S Puget Dr 0-5 Renton WA 98055 073760-1300 Bevan Raymond H 12808 NE 139th CT Kirkland WA 98034 073780-1310 ( ( ( - C ( ( ( t ( ( ( t. ( t 6 • IL c (. ( JUN 28 '89 11:09 286 271_7202 P.4/4 • • ASSESSOR'S . • NAME ' ADDRESS ' PARCEtt NUMBER • • • 04.04!e- CERTIFICATION A ; hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property owners and their I. ad asses were taken from the records of the King County Assessor as prescribed by law. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me. a I . Notary Public, in and Tor the State of Washington • residing da ate, . �. „ �l B� � on the ��__._ y . SIGNED . i J. MICMAEL HAZEL 'Wig • Notary Public , (Pb tk. ." A a ,rd) STATE OF WASHINGTON My Comm. Exp.July 21,1990 • ' CERTIFICATION OF MAILING.''' •• • . • • ect I.��v .__ t, S�X; hereby certify that notices of the public meeti on the t listed adjacen property ojwner ias te plan approval were mailed on c,j�E '0119 eft. o each prescribed by law. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to for t a State ofeWash Washington • Notary Public. in andon residing at RC117-0 A.-)._. • , • the ,�.O-t4 day of 1 I A) )S�� • • &Ps.")0, (1_.....6 P-P_-ea0-sk, • SIGNED: .-a-- l_- - y FORM - ' ^ ` ' CORPORATE RESOLUTION NORTH BAY DEVELOPMENT CORP. The undersigned Sole Director of the Corporation designated Linda Ramstedt as Assistant Secretary to sign real estate purchases and sale agreements and other corporate documents related to the business of the corporation during the absense of the President of the Corporation from the date of this Resolution. This authority shall continue through the month of June, 1989. Any such documents shall be binding on the corporation as though signed by the President. � c� � i ---�r--'-------------- ��0 ' ' '-- ---------------- Date J�� - - m Miller, Sole Director On this day personally appeared before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington duly commissioned and sworn, John Miller, to me known to be the individual described herein and who executed the with and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he signed the same as his free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. GIAN under my hand and official seal thisAh; day of , 1989. NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at . J . /CHaEL HAZEL Notary Public Pv»uc OFWaS*/woTOW m. Exp.Jm/y21.1eyn . n