The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutUtilities Committee - 02 Mar 2026 - Agenda (2) O � � . CITY OF RENTON AGENDA - Utilities Committee 3:00 p.m. -Monday, March 2,2026 7th Floor Council Conference Room/Videoconference 1. ORDINANCE DECLARING A PORTION OF AN EXISTING UTILITY SURPLUS AND AUTHORIZING ITS PARTIAL RELEASE Community and Economic Development Department—Economic Development Division recommends adoption of an ordinance declaring a portion of an existing utility surplus; and requests adoption of a resolution setting a public hearing to consider this matter on March 2, 2026. • Agenda Bill 2. AGREEMENT WITH TETRA TECH, INC. FOR BIG SOOS CREEK AT 116TH AVE SE SEDIMENT CONTROL PROJECT Public Works—Utility Systems Division recommends execution of an agreement with Tetra Tech, Inc., in the amount of$298,671 for engineering services for the Big Soos Creek at 116th Ave SE Sediment Control project. • Agenda Bill • Presentation 3. CONTRACT WITH RECOLOGY KING COUNTY FOR GARBAGE, RECYCLABLES, AND COMPOSTABLES SERVICE Public Works—Administration recommends execution of an agreement with Recology King County in the projected amount of$241,000,000 for garbage, recyclables, and compostables services from April 1, 2027 through March 31, 2037. • Agenda Bill • Presentation 4. EMERGING ISSUES IN UTILITIES If you would like to attend this week's meeting remotely,you can do so by going to https://us02web.zoom.us/j/83091818834?pwd=THk4aTBVc2piMFhNRmxFTm03UEY1 QT09 Zoom Meeting ID: 830 9181 8834, Passcode: 009336 You can call through Zoom at(253) 215-8782 and use the Meeting ID. • SUBJECT/TITLE: Ordinance Declaring a Portion of An Existing Utility Surplus,Authorizing its Partial Release, and Resolution Setting a Public Hearing RECOMMENDEDACTION: Referto Utilities Committee DEPARTMENT: Community& Economic Development STAFF CONTACT: Amanda Free, Economic Development Director EXT.: 7369 . • . . • N/A � � • � • On November 26, 1979, City Council passed Ordinance No. 3378, vacating a portion of Tacoma Ave NE, subject to a utility easement reserved in favor of the City. The easement encumbers two parcels, King County Parcel Nos. 7791000050 and 7791000060. Jennifer M. Saechao is the current owner of Parcel No. 7791000050 and would like to construct an accessory dwelling unit on their propertywithin a portion of the easement. The current owner has submitted a petition for release of the portion of the easement within Parcel No. 7791000050 and has proposed an alternative utility easement that will serve as a replacement easement.As part of the permitting process for the accessory dwelling unit the replacement easement will be dedicated to the City at no cost for the continued operation and maintenance of the utilities. � • � � • Staff recommends adoption of an ordinance declaring a portion of the easement surplus to the City's needs and authorizing its partial release, and adoption of a resolution setting a public hearing on March 2, 2026, to consider the matter. 1 PETITION FOR RELEASE OF EASEMENT Noven�ber 18,2025 To the Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council 1055 SoutlZ Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 Subject: Petition to Release Existing Utility Easement Property Address: 3906 NE 17t1� Street, Renton, WA 98056 Parcel No.: 7791000050 Owner Name: Jennifer M. Saechao PETITION STATEMENT Tlle undersigned property owner of the property affectcd by a certain portion of the public easement, hereby petitions the City of Renton to release the existing?5-foot utility easement originally rese�ved under Ordinance No. 3378 adoptcd November 26, 1979, and recorded under King Counry Recording No. 791230596 (see attached Exhibit F), which applies to the above- described property. The existing easement lies along the easteni boundary nf the parcel and extends approximately 25 feet westward from the shared property line, as legally described in Exhibit A �nd shown in Exhibit B. The adjoining parcel to the east eontains an ideiltical 25-foat easement, also created under Ordiiiance No.3378, resulting in a combined 50-foot utiliry corridoi•that exceeds current utility access reguirements. In excl�ange for the release of the existing easeinent, tl�e praperty ownerwill grant the City a new ]0-foot utility easement, measured from the eastern property line, as depicted in Exhibit D and le�ally dcscribed in Exllibit E. The�property awizer further resp�etfully requests a waiver of appr�isal �nd compeilsation requicements, as no additionaI property rights beyond those established and compensated under t11e 1�979 rigllt-of=way vacation will be conveyed. The justification supporting the easemcnt release and rec�uested waiver is included in Exhibit C. The proposed new 10-foot easement will be legally described and recorded following City review and approval. Petion for Release of Easement �3906 NE 17th ST,Renton WA 98056 � APN: 7791000050 Page 1 of 3 I rcqucst a timc and placc bc tixcd for public hcaring and for thc �ctition to bc hcard by thc City Council. Of the owners of the property aPfected by the portion of this cascment, 100`%, of thc property affccted by the cascmcnt havc a�recd and indicated thci►- joinin� pctition �vith thcir si��natw•es below: AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORI"/_ATION Property Owner Name: Jennifer M. Saechao Mailing Address: 8419 l27`'' PL SE, Newcastic, WA 9R056 Phone/ F,mail: 425.Y02.7R 1 R �jen.saechao(c��mail.com I, Jennifer M. Saechao, declare that I am the c�m�ent owner of the property involved in this petition. And that the foregoing statement and signature hercin containcd anci the information herewith are in all respects true and correct to the best ot�my knowledge and belicf. � S i�niturc: D�tc: /�� .��5 ennnifer M. Saechao, owner State of Washington ) ) SS County of King ) 1 certify that I know or have sati5l'actory evidence that Jcnnifcr M. Sacchao signcd this insu-umcnt and •�`��NG LEF��i� uscs a d p�i��scs(mcnit�mcd in tl�icv n,tit�limciltct ior the 1� =`y``��t'/ ''� _ \` � ��,'/ �� i i=�?Ot��/ ' . ,sZ,o��9 = 2; � �� ,o��' =h0^ Notary ublic in an - thc statc ol�Washington i��,�,�9,��n,2\;��d _ C �� Q ��i��\`WPS`�r Notary Print `�� My appointment expires: � �'�G Petion for Release of Easement �3906 NE 17th ST,Renton WA 98056 � APN: 7791000050 Page 2 of 3 ATTACHMENTS (EXNIBITS) Exhibit A.—Legal description of the easement to Ue rcicased Exhibit B—Map exhibit showing area proposed for release Exhibit C—Statement of justification and public Ucnefit Exhibit D—Map exhibit of proposed new 10-foot easeinent Exhibit E—Legal description of proposed 10-foot clsemcnt Exhibit F—Copy of recorded Ordinance No. 3378 � i � � � � . Petion for Release of Easement �3906 NE 17th ST,Renton WA 98056 � APN. 7791000050 Page 3 of 3 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF EASEMENT TO BE RELEASED THAT PORTION OF VACATED 1315T AVENUE SOUTHEAST ADJOINING LOT 19, SIERRA TERRACE DIVISION NO. 1, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 76 OF PLATS, PAGES 53 AND 54, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, EXCEPT ANY PORTION LYING EAST OF THE CENTERLINE OF SAID 1315T AVENUE SOUTHEAST. SAID PORTION WAS VACATED BY ORDINANCE NUMBER 3378 AND RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 7912030596. SITUATE IN THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4,SECTION 4,TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE S EAST,W.M.. ��OWDEIV A ti �F �"S�t�l O'v �� _ ��''a'�'� �a� � t��P 57176 �� Gt STE4'� I�L LAl`1� 11/17/25 � 3 w � � � z r� N H d= N � \ \ W N � � \ \ � � � � _ - -� ; � � � � W � �-- _ ___ � � Z � o � � � o m � o � . � .� o v � o � � � � ,ZO'8L 3 „10,69.00 N � sQ> � F � l0 > pp N O r^ � 3 � � � �+J �n > �n � Ln N N N� N T 0�0 y � m Q Z � �� ,OL'89 3 „10,65.00 N � � z �� o�� H oNo ,� � N �� W N lol M 'oMj 3 � � W _ ,� o o�� a x w � v��s �Q� �, �' ° � W � N � t/1 O (=Q � °� � r� � o �' C`3 � F o I�I Z J C� Z � ,-7-� � � �p O� 1-1 rl F�-1 ~� (� w F" p O� � � U� W Q � � GON w � � � � l� 0 0 � W � � � � N � W OOw p ,� �pFU ZW 3 „10,69.00 N o z � m F" � � a � Q � � � � Q.��}�� P� [�1G�y, �i co w � Q e � F O � � �� " O � � � � F-� �j.�O 'Q'�'ti f EXHIBIT C STATEMENT OF JUSTIFICATION AND PUBLIC BENEFIT This Exhibit provides the required justification for the requested release of the existing 25-foot utility easement on the subject property and the accompanying request for a waiver of appraisal and compensation. Both components are part of a single consolidated action and are evaluated together in accordance with the City of Renton Easement Release Checklist. 1. Purpose of Easement Release The existing 25-foot easement on the subject property, together with a matching 25-foot easement on the adjoining parcel to the east, was established under the same 1979 right-of-way vacation approved through Ordinance No. 3378. This action created a combined 50-foot-wide utility corridor, centered on the shared property line. The easement as situated on this property occupies approximately 25 feet measured westward from the eastern property line. This width significantly exceeds modern utility access needs for residential parcels and is not supported by any demonstrated operational requirement. The property owner proposes that the City release the existing easement and accept a new 10- foot easement, which is consistent with current City and industry utility standards and sufficient for maintenance, repair, and future utility needs. 2. Public Benefit of the Easement Release and Replacement Easement a. Adequate utility access fully preserved The new 10-foot easement maintains full City rights to access, maintain, repair, or expand utility facilities. b. Correction of an oversized and outdated corridor The 50-foot corridor created in 1979 was never reduced or redefined when the street was vacated, resulting in an unnecessarily large easement burden on both properties. c. Improved land-use efficiency Releasing the oversized easement allows the property to be used more reasonably without diminishing City access. d. Supports City housing and infill goals Exhibit C Statement of Justification � 3906 NE 17`"ST, Renton,WA 98056 � APN 7791000050 Page 1 of 2 The corrected easement boundary enables future construction of DADUs, advancing Renton's objectives for housing variety and infill development. e. Long-term economic benefit Site improvements enabled by this adjustment will result in increased property tax revenues, utility fee revenues, and local economic activity. 3. Justification for Waiver of Appraisal and Compensation a. The City was already compensated in 1979 As part of the right-of-way vacation under Ordinance No. 3378, the City received compensation for the land area from which the easements were reserved. No new or additional property interest is being transferred. b. Replacement easement preserves all access rights The new 10-foot easement maintains the full scope of utility access ariginally intended under the 1979 ordinance. c. Requiring new compensation would impose a duplicate charge Since the City already received compensation for this property interest, requiring additional payment now would be a duplicate charge and inequitable to the homeowner. d. Public-benefit-oriented corrections should not impose undue financial burden Given that the adjustment improves clarity, maintains full utility access, and supports City policy goals, the waiver is reasonable, equitable, and consistent with administrative easement corrections. Conclusion The proposed release of the existing 25-foot easement, the grant of a new 10-foot replacement easement, and the request for waiver of appraisal and compensation together represent a fair, reasonable, and publicly beneficial action. The adjustment maintains all necessary City access while correcting an outdated easement width, improving land-use efficiency, and supporting long-term community goals. Exhibit C Statement of Justification � 3906 NE 17`"ST, Renton,WA 98056 � APN 7791000050 Page 2 of 2 � 3 w � � � z � N H � � N \ � d � \ � � w � - - - / N � � � � c � � ai c o � z I � O +� O aU m o � � w — f� .� c_ I_ � � ai � �� o — �, � � _ � � Q> � L Y > �— � � � � � � - - - � � N � � � � � � v � � mQ z 0 �o � ��o � `'�°� � x d� � � w W z � w � o � H o � � `� o � w d � � � c�v � � � � � �—�' � � � N� oza o � � � oU z � Q � � w ¢ o � M � a � Q �"' r--� � � � � i--� � � 4�}�� w � � � � � � F a � � �� ' � w �o "� � � �,� 4�' ti� �j?p � EXHIBIT E LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF UTILITY EASEMENT THE EASTERLY 10 FEET OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED TRACT OF LAND: LOT 19,SIERRA TERRACE DIVISION NO. 1, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 76 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 53 AND 54, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY,WASHINGTON; TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF VACATED 131ST AVENUE SOUTHEAST ADJOINING OR ABUTTING THEREON,VACATED BY ORDINANCE NO. 3378 AND RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 7912030596, ATTACHED TO SAID PREMISES BY OPERATION OF LAW, EXCEPT ANY PORTION LYING EAST OF THE CENTERLINE OF SAID 131ST AVENUE SOUTHEAST. CONTAINING 781 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. ��OWDEIV A ti �F �"Syf�l O'V �� _ ��'"'�'� il�a, � t��P 57176 �� i�ct STEg'� 1��4L L,AL� 11/17/25 EXHIBIT F Copy of recorded Ordinance No. 3378 COUNTY Of KIIV� ) ��} '��~,---_.__ � - _ _ ��n ; `----__,,.,_ �``: �_ � �,��1,(,�.j�.�. � s��:l�_�}..1�,City C}erk ia end,ft�r t7k�, i�y of,i�nton, , � 'I'�►' VVasMngton, do hereby Cet h 'the fo�gotr�g Ordinance ig a�ue �td.cor�ect ��' � , a ,�.,;. copy of Or�inanee No.._� �.._,...of tRe City of Renfon, as i�8�p2ar5`Cur fil; ` ` ` � � � - �� n my atfiee, a�nd do furth� certffy�that ttt�,:Sei�e�has� beeri p�bshe�#�aecOrdm� , s � . - � � � � � ,:: - �� to�law.� } � 7 , = ' In Witness Wbereof f hq've Mereunta sei'my hond and affixed the sEal of the � � . ' �--� ,, Clty of Renton, this-----:s.�.r�.._------d'�'or+-L✓-��EL11�CK..�'_`.r--��. .�,': CITY QF RENTOIV, WAS ..�_p�c�y ae�k �:.:�; ; � ORDINANCE NQ. �37�� ..:a '^ AN ORDINANCE .OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTO�i_ .� '�`�� ` VACATING A PORTION OF TACOMA AVENUE N.E. , �.� ��`-`+ `` (VAC-17-79) VALI..�Y INVESTMENT PRQPERTIES/ ��`,, ROBERT C. OI�SQN �" . :�' . WHEREAS a proper petition for vacating a portion of �' `' Tacoma Avenue N .E. NoXth of N>.E . 17�h St. between Shelton � ` ,� �' Or 6venue N.E. & Unian Ave. :d.E. , Renton, Ki�g County, Washington, �'�+ t,C') � � was duly filed with the City Clerk Qn- or �laout August 15, 1g7�, �; 0 �.: N .�... and said petition �a�ing been sigr�ed by a�mers representing more �:: " �� - than two-thirds of the property abutting upon such street sought , . , � to be vacated; and [JHEREAS the City Council �ay Resalution rlo. 2292 passed and approved on August 27 , I979 , and after due investigation, did fix and determine the Ist day of �ctober, 1.979,at the hour P � of 8: QO P.M. in the Citq Gouncil Chambers o� �he City o� Renton to be the tiine anc� pl.ace for a publzc heazing , �hereon, and the City Clerk having given due notice af' such hearing in the manner : pravided by law, and a21 persons having been heard appearing in ' favor or in opposition thereto ; and WHEREAS the Department o� Public Works �nd the Planning Department of the City of Renton having duly considered said Y petition for said vaeation, � and having found same to �e �n the public interest and for the public b�en�fit, and no injury or damage to any person or properties will result fzom such vaeations , :�4W THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON , WASHINGTON, `D0 ORDAIN AS FOLLOW� : SECTIQN I : The following des�ribed portion �� treet , to-wit . .. . �. . � - - ' -- • .. .... _ . . , . - . .. _ .. y --- � - - - -�� i � , y, r SECTION II : The City Council hereby elects to charge a fee of 51 , 203. 50 to Petitioner-Owners , said amount not exceeding one-halt of the City' s appraisal of the right-of-way interest herein vacated, and such charge being reasonable and proper . SECTION III : This Ordinance shall be effective upon its `� passage , approval and five days after its publication. CT�� , � O A certified copy af this Ordinance shall be filed with � the Office of Records and Elections , King County, and as otherwise � grovided by law. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 26th day of November, 1979 . � , De ore�s��e , _i _y C er APPROVED $Y THE MAYOR this 26th day of Notaember�, 1979 . � .s� �. _x°•. w4t... �Y�. t:�i1_�'--..____.__. Barbara Y. Shinpach, rlayor Pro tem Approved as to form: f'ti.,.t1ti`�='^-<-.�' `� 1��f"i-�+�,r�,. Lawrence J. Wa ren, City Attorney Date of Publicatlon : Novembe�- 30, 1979 . 1 � ` . � � ' .. .. :� F, . - .. � � . . � i , . � . � . . . . � '��'� Ordiiiance No. 3378 . . �X 1�-�i C3 1 i � , That portion of undesignated City o£ �cent�rt stre�t ri^t r .��_w:.�v h:,vin�; a width of 50" ft. (known as I.31sr �"v`. `�,E ner t.�L ��; Co�.xnty' Grid for nurnberin� street) is :s zru�.�.ka<; �rith�.n �:;.i� pl_�G of Sierra Terra�� DiviSion No. 1 as rccord�>c? iri �'pL�rq� �F :� � � plats �ages 53 and 54 recor4s oi Kina; C"t,; ,.:v 4' ::��,.ri?ttn . ��.y�� CT �o�:�herl.y of t�i� mast sauth�rly line vi Lo4 "::"� , c�aUr_ �� +h�z ?::': 0 line of Lot 19, and north of the north r i.�,4�t-c�i-ta�.y p£` 1Y c '.? �; :;Y � extended and wc�st of the west line of L�t �'�J �,f sai�: ��t. O . N As situated within the SE I/4 of S«�tiori �+, Tc�wnship 2� tv. , �:sc-,^.��x ' 0� E. , WM � � • r � � � � . � � � � z , � o� om z° y � � b y O 2 . � O . A� b c •- � � i��, ' � . < ' . � � �^r. . . " ' Ordinance No. 337$ � �G �y 't''} , _ � , ��:- � . �' • I 301 � � - +Q , { z;�.5 1 . . ' �^� � , i ns -ai �' ¢ ' ---•.. 0�, 4oN.. + /0 , � � - 1 �, ,'� \ ^ , � . v9 , C�1 � �. _ �� . ?�� C�? �. , ..- ��, p� � �: _..- � ._ _____.. _ � �a8 � ' " : . ' o .�Q�,,P Q R�� c o V ,. � � - ' ` � $`�'`� , . � ' .' � � _ �� . �RAF� �• � �/ l�, f_ � � " r�� rca, � � � �` 2�Q4• Q� , . ^ � � r� G'�'I'kC .�� (r;�3� -��_ �Z , '^ v t�5 °' � , , i ;' o� � �► �e!_..` �: � Z , „ , , .� �� `� ��y�. � , i ----- -- . . : . . �r �- _ -�_�... '� s_�4 9� 4� � � �. . �, � . r,,'rt � ,',::(,.- ^ " ?i � 9 � z pr.. � + (1j, �o� , �'��W�► q Z,l �� 1 r;,..s--'�.- � •' �. � 2B,J �,�_.-^'� 3�S � i -.ts. � .�05 �i _ ` ' .�'�'� z�e ' t /4-93 �. 9-2-/9 .�l3G+T � _ " . � .,. .S'..r . �GG' P. � �4�-0 7�f�—/.�O'�4..57� �1� .-- � -__ _ :� ._.. _ � ._ _.. -�� ... .1='.._ __ Y ..._ ..-,.} --- -�-=�-,�':�ac'^,�: • m.__ _. � - \""' � o � 7s 90 ir.�e rs �o :C ; .. . _ � t-0 . m , > �f 2 5 Z.S � � 'A� �' (Y� � Y11► pt �' ► ui , � f ? , 1� � �P a Z qi; � : b , o ' � ' z go : ct V. �. _ ' � �8 � o N :a�,+'��w-� ' c0 � � � v �-; o.�n�''-�8,�1�,� , . z � hG ' �� • �G• �✓.BB�t4 32 it! _.,.� �J qa' . �3 r � � ,�'� '� �`w^ � �1 i I.o�+`;d I M �3� � 259 _ __.. � �`_`� � � � O .!D ,-,5 ,�as _. � U /Fj V� ��'. . � (,v ' , O A, , 9./ .,i /O 1, M it ••s vJ- _ oo,�a . N V� .�;&�d��.� �.c . ;� , ' '� . ✓. � ' �z�t e - Fj ,� �P. . 'r , . r a p . f�6 0 � � . `� � ;2� q � , . � � p'\� `,,'irO.. �� ; '1s�z t, a� . �oo�o � Jp � ,�.��_...,.... - �4 s'* '� 'Z ' ',�" o0 9r+ ' = ti' ' !� `-- :' .. , .. s�7� " , � • ,rxai' � :`,tt�+l � � . f" � � � ��sts�, �� N.119• 2wC 3'l,sw' fi ,�;i� � r ,� y. Q t �$�� , 0 �� ^ ` � � • v I�• ' 4� y�y , . p(!?0 � � ! p � _' � fr" �� O,A?p •. ., .. ? ' . � :'` � n�j � /Z .��fG t . � I OD1a Z � ��gp 1 �.., �v ,. ' . e � ? p �:,,�,/7 ' � �� .o` 4 � C O O. ' , �y ,. � p �;ee•i.o.• .`,. - y s �, b � �y �s N0 � ts tar .:e�s.rs .�,.,� � ooSo . �'�� ` � , �� Cx � Q � � j $+►; ; ;��w, ' r.e.s zZ �A4' � �� N. ''y: �'C. . �k , ,� � � �� , • . +c ` Z6 ��y a Sy� M!��+ n q �� y o,..,o,b:: ; �.�' -Q , « (� � p � o l �o s'46+�{�1 / �� . v o/2'G `�4 �' ,�9. F� S ,* . �,�� T. �. . .. ,�' - -�•,� - ioR�9 ^• da.os.s.>-.,c � $Er.r ioU.7 '�.1 n�.a9 <•� rs.�v z .� s .. I � , , � �, � '.��.7-� v � ,�V.�•or �a•v. _ ' t�� lt }�`" � 30 ,� i � 1__. oi3 � v . , _ � , " /MR1�;7id. � � , ,�-��_; IF' � t + �"� ;'`i + !.i � , e� a� . �' zg � � �:° � . • h � o��. � ;� � � � � � - �a..,��3�,� ►.� . z Q ..�� ,,,,� �--, c .I e�-� ` � �>�.,.� .. � . _ , �„ � � ' � "��, 29�S0 � � h . ' + _��T�� o re�o �q/t. .,. , . , Q �c'� /o� 9Y� . SS � vv dh9•o,s.,.ao.v-.� � '�' .S; r9c9 ;E7 A-32�1: - !�6'4-�� ,;Y..-:._,__ 1;,...�.`'` � ��F � �►.:._ 3 �_,.�+�� `� �b'> ._ � .o� ..rn V � ` Q� � RO�.Iav9�:, '.._..� _�...� �".t'll g O'r/ { . _ -. ;4 .� t� CITY OF RENTON,WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DECLARING A PORTION OF AN EXISTING UTILITY EASEMENT RESERVED BY ORDINANCE NO. 3378 SURPLUS TO THE CITY'S NEEDS, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AND RECORD WITH KING COUNTY A PARTIAL RELEASE OF SAID EASEMENT, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, on November 26, 1979, City Council passed Ordinance No. 3378, vacating a portion of Tacoma Ave NE, subject to a utility easement reserved in favor of the City(the "Easement"), attached hereto and incorporated by this reference as Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, the Easement encumbers two parcels, King County Parcel Nos. 7791000050 and 7791000060. Jennifer M. Saechao ("Petitioner-Owner") is the current owner of Parcel No. 7791000050; and WHEREAS, Petitioner-Owner would like to construct an accessory dwelling unit on their property; and WHEREAS, Petitioner-Owner has proposed an alternative utility easement that will serve as a replacement easement as shown on Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated by reference, which will be dedicated to the City at no cost for the continued operation and maintenance of the utilities; and WHEREAS, pursuant to requirements of Chapter 9-1 of the Renton Municipal Code ("RMC"), on November 20, 2025, Petitioner-Owner filed a petition for partial release of the easement ("Petition") which was signed by owners of more than two-thirds (2/3) of the property affected by the subject portion of the Easement contained within Parcel No. 7791000050; and 1 ORDINANCE NO. WHEREAS, the Petition included a request by the Petitioner-Owner that Council waive any compensation, as the City was compensated at the time of the street vacation and a new easement will be dedicated; and WHEREAS, the Community and Economic Development Department ("CED"), in coordination with other City Departments and in compliance with the City's Policy & Procedure #100-12 related to Surplus Real Property, has identified the portion of the Easement contained within Parcel No. 7791000050 as surplus to the City's needs; and WHEREAS the City, after a news release and publication of a public notice for public hearing, did hold on March 2, 2026, a public hearing in accordance with RCW 35.94.040 to consider declaring the portion of the Easement contained within Parcel No. 7791000050 surplus to the City's needs, and those members of the public who wished to testify were duly allowed to testify and the testimony was considered by the City Council; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The facts and background of the Recitals are found to be accurate and true for the purposes of this Ordinance. SECTION II. Pursuant to RMC 9-1-4 the Easement is a Class A easement due to the City's expenditures to place and maintain a water line. SECTION III. Pursuant to RMC 9-1-2.B Council hereby waives compensation for its partial release as the City has previously been compensated, and affirms that the processingfee identified in the City Fee Schedule is required. 2 ORDINANCE NO. SECTION IV. The portion of the Easement contained within Parcel No. 7791000050 is hereby declared surplus to the needs of the City, and it is in the best interests of the public to release the Easement. SECTION V.The Mayor and City Clerk are authorized to execute and record with King County a partial release of easement in a form the same or similar to that in Exhibit C, herein incorporated bythis reference, alongwith a copyofthis Ordinance. SECTION VI. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality thereof shall not affect the constitutionality of any other section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this ordinance. SECTION VII. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect five (5) days after publication of a summary of this ordinance in the City's official newspaper. The summary shall consist of this ordinance's title. PASSED BYTHE CITYCOUNCILthis dayof , 2026. Jason A. Seth, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2026. Armondo Pavone, Mayor 3 ORDINANCE NO. Approved as to form: Shane Moloney, CityAttorney Date of Publication: ORD-CED:260RD001:02.02.2026 4 EXHIBIT A Copy of recorded Ordinance No. 3378 COUNTY Of KIIV� J ��} �'��""`�---.--_ � - _ ��n ; `----__,,.,_ �``: �_ � �,��1,(,�.j�.�. � s��:l�_�}..l`�,Ciky C1erk in end,fflr t7►i�, i�y of,i�nton, , � 'I'�►� VVasMngton, do hereby Cet h 'the for�g9�g Ordinance ig a�ue �td,cor�ect ��' � , a �,�.,;. aopy of�Or�inanee�No.__� �.._,�. .of tt4e�Cit�4f Renfon, as��i��p2"�r'S�C�rr fF�� , s; " - in my atfiee, and do furth �certffy that t��se�ie has bsen pi�bshe�#'aecordm� '� ,,?_ ta law. C ,�,. �r. In Witness Wbereof f hq've Meram#a set rny twnd and affixed the sEal of the .�.. .:�. r,�ty of R�,to�, tn�s-----:�.r�.�----._aav o`�_�C��,---1 R2 j. .�, ; CITY QF RENTOI�, WAS --�_- - --. c�y ae�k �_ r �,>:; flR.DINANCE NQ. .�33Z�.�., - ..�r;, '` AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTO�i ��a". --.� �,,, VACATING A PORTION �F TACOMA AVENUE N.E. , `,�``+ ' (VAC-17-79) VALI.�Y INVE�TMENT PRQPERTIES/ ��`,, ROBERT C. OI�SQN �" . :�' . WHEREAS a proper petition for vacating a portion of �' `' Tacoma Avenue N .E. NoXth of N>,E . 17�h St. between Shelton � ` ,� �' Or Avenue N.E. & Unian Ave. :d.E. , Renton, Ki�g County, Washington, �'�+ t,C') � � was duly filed with the Cit3r Cl.erk Qn- or �laout August IS, 1g7�, �; 0 �.: N .�... and said petition �a�ing been: sigr�ed by a�mers representing more �:: " ��`� �- than two-thirds of the property abutting upon such street sought . �. , � to be vacat�d; and : t�JHEREAS tYie C?ty Council �ay Resalution No, 2292 passed and ap�roved on August 27 , ZQ79 , and after due investigation, did fix and determine the Ist day of �ctober, L979,at the hour P of $: QO P.M. in the Citq Couticil Chambers o� �he City of Renton to be the tiine anc� pl.ace for a publzc heazing , �hereon, and the City Clerk having given due notice af' such hearing in the manner : pravided by law, and a21 persons having been heard apge�aring in ' favor or in opposition thereto ; and WHEREAS the Department o� Public Works �nd the Planning Department of the Gity of Renton having duly consiaered said petition for said vaeation, � and having found same to be �.n the pu.blic interest and far the pub'1ic b�en�fit, and no it�jury or '` damage to any person or prop�rties will result fxom such vacations , :�4W THEREFORE, TH� CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENT'ON , WASHINGTON, `D0 ORDAIN AS FOLLOW� : SECTIQN I : The following des�ribed portion �f street , to-wit . : See Exhibit -"A" attachec� hereto and made a par.t � hereof as if full.y set forth herein $E AND THE SA.�"� iS HEREBY VACATED . SUB.SECT �o an easement over, across, . and under and Qn a11 0� tk�e aforedes�r�.bed property 3.n`favor af the Ci�y for utility and re�.ated purpases. i �L�D 1�1 �Li�iJ�� l ��qt�.�:71 � .. �h �-��'} ,r��, �, � � 1 ..��.�=r'u.�^,''G'f'�,;�''..».. ;��'1' � � J,:}� Name....�:c�s./... .,... . � `� ,� I° �� ! "; e�.�.�..��..�...Q...':�..� , : A REF r i�1,,, , ; � � � � �r : `' �`� t��,�"U ;��t��1��5 : , , ,, - . • : ' . ,., : SECTION II : The City Council hereby elects to charge a fee of 51 , 203. 50 to Petitioner-Owners , said amount not exceeding one-halt of the City' s appraisa], of the right-of-way interest herein vacated, and such charge being reasonable and proper . SECTION III : This Ordinance shall be effective upon its `� passage , approval and five days after its publication. CT�� , � O A certified copy af this Ordinance shall be filed with � the Office of Records and Elections , King County, and as otherwise � grovided by law. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 26th day of November, 1979 . De ore�s��ea�d `i y C er , _ APPROVED $Y THE MAYOR this 26th day of Notaember�, 1979 . � .s� �. _x°•. w4t... �Y�. t:�i1_�'--..____.__. Barbara Y. Shinpach, rlayor Pro tem Approved as to form: �;� ��'� , � .� `�,��2��tJ'�r,_.,..�,.. `��.�,.,� Lawrence J. Wa ren, City Attorney Date of Publication : November 30, 1979 Ordinance No. 3378 Page 2 . 1 � ` . � � , . � ",4'� Ord�iiance No. 3378 . . �X!�-4 i C3 1 i � , That portion of undesignated Citv c�£ �cent�rt stre�t ri^t r ��-w:.:.1 huvin�; a width of 50" ft. (known as I.31sr �"v`. `�,E ner t.�L ��; Co�.xnty' Grid for nurnberin� street) is :s zru�.�.ka<; �rith�.n �:;.i� pl_�G of Sierra Terra�� DiviSion No. 1 as rccord�>c? iri �'pL�rq� �F :� � � l�lats �ages 53 and 54 recor4s oi Kina; C"t,; ,.:v 4' ::��;.ri?ttn . ��.y�� CT 5�r�:�herl.y of t�i� mast sauth�rly li.ne vi Lo4 "::"� , c�aUr_ �� +h�z ?:-~ 0 line of Lot 19, and north of the north r i.�,4�t-c�i-ta�.y p£` 1Y c '.? �; :;� � extended and wc�st of the west 1inc� of L�t �'�J �,f sai�: ��t. O . N As situated within the SE I/G of S«�t�an �+, Tc�wnship 2� tv� , ?��_��;_. ' � E. , �dM � � . r � ' ~ � � � . � . 2 � � . i . � o� am z° y � � b y O 2 . � O . A� b c •- � � i��, ' � . < ' . � � '� . � ' � � . �M . � . . " ' Ordinance No. 337$ � �G �y 't''} , _ �� , ��:- � . �' • I 301 � � - +Q , { z;�.5 1 . ' �. � � _ � ¢ ., � , t _ "_"''_' G9S: 4/ ,��. ��GN. + /O , 1 ��_''�� ; � , � a9 � �� _ �N h . � . '�.�19 _ "" �! _ _ ��, p�� :' � - ` �o e � . . - . � . o ,�Q�P Q R` � - : �p' , ` O ��;p j� - � s :. 6. � � �� , F l - ---j . ��p.� , � } ,, f_ � _ �. � r,� ,+ca, � � � �` ti��4• Q� , . ' ' r� G.�,!'kC .�A. i�� '+�" �Z ' ,� o. �5 °► , . o �� 8!_..` � �. � Z , „ , , .� �� '�yy� � , � ----- -- . . : . . �r �- _ -�_�... '� s_�4 g� 4� ' � pc� �, � . r,'''t � .�,::�'-_ ^ " ?i � 9 � z pr.. � + (1j, F�o� " � ,�W� q Z•l �\ � •--',�°�' `0 1'n. i 2B;J �_,,,-� 305 � / -�tS. .305 d/ ` ' .�� 274 L /4-93 �. 9-2-/9 �f,134T � _ � : ` "' .S'..r . �GiG' i?,� ,� �4^O 7 if��/40'�4..57� �i� - � -__ _._._ . � r ._ _.. -�� ... .1='.._ __ Y ..._ _...} --- �,�ac ^,t: ce.__ _ '- � -- _ .r- \-�. � 0 7s 90 ir.�e rs �a :c . 3 , " ' fi �� 25 Z.S f � � . Z.A� � N� Ac �' � , . w , � r t 1 � COP a� �1� 7 ' • p� � 0 a 2ga+ ¢ �._ � � . 78 ^ o N :��;+��w;_. ' cD � �r1 ; p./n�.��1 • o � � , �v �G• NgB�is sz.s: `h - ° • i �3h� �; �1� i ' -� _� ,,,., �gA . ? tY r i s.o�+ ,l+ � ;;k� • �3� '. � 259 �•�� o // O ` .�D 17S ,� � /Fj V� ��'. ! � W ' Q y , g./ .,i /O 1, M it a•s ,w- _ oo,�a . N `� .�&�ti is.3 �►- . ;�' . ' �z�t e V i`a� ' �j�� ' .' P� . � � 'r r a p , f�6' p � � . p`;i � s2� Q � ' .. OoIG � � 9\O �� . �� ; �1;c9�2 t4 ` * '� Z ,� Do 9►� � ' ^� �l� ,,. "!�'-'`�---_-^--„ �„ . _ � . E�7� . S ' � , , '1� �-- � . ,rxaa�. � �N � � . f" � p. � � ��sts�, �� N.119• 2wC 3'l,sw' fi � � r . �+ � �$�� O 0 � . Q �t ' � � , ? � `�� ' I �p ��y a � o� .� ., oc.10 Z Q ,Oa?p r y;; �, <-' O�� j � iz �t� t � , � • . e,� �:2g�y 4 � ' � ,� �; � �, f � b 0 Q ' �y , � ,.�';/�7� �V, a �;ee•i.a• .`,. . y -�' � �v 2S � " �.rs .�,.,`� � ooSo r b < Cx o��o rs rx �� , q ` $'4 �,,��, � y$.�zZ �AI�� , �+f 1�'y '''�f ��Q, � � '' , �� , ~ . . ,� ` 26 ��y� Si-�e . "!+9 � � � �� y o ,,,6 4 ��, �Q V « �,7v a � o ! `,o .59 a+f.�1 / '� A. � ^ . o/t'o `; �4 R ,�9. I .. � � �o��e � .� de.of.s.s.,- � $Err i�.7 T N . .� 1 S�' � .r��r z', i.� - � � � � � '.r��.7- v � �v.�a•or �aw. _ ' t�� lt �"` O 3p � i � "�_ oi3 � v • . " /MR1�;7id. � � , ,�-��_; IF' � t + �"� ;'`i + !.i � , , e� a` . �' zg � � �:° , • h � o��. � ;� � � � � � - �a..,��3�,� ►.� . �Q ..�� ,,,,� �--, c .I e�-� ` � �>�.,.� .. � . , _ , �„ � , ' � "��, 29�S0 h� � h . ' + _��T�� o re�o �q/t. � .,. ,_,._ Q � /o� 9Y� � r,,,[S� / vv dh9•o,s.,.ao.v-.� � '�' .S; r9c9 ;E7 A�32�1: - !�6'4-�� ,;Y�- 1;,..�`'' �. ,--M ��.h*��'�..=-�3 Q 9 2 R p =�., --^�� --. r,,,.,�_g�:�� , b' ._ ,$ \ � � ,�:� , --� � � 6�a es �a � i s �' � 1 y . r _.., ` � .a i g \ 2 � '+ �'_ __ .- . .. . "'_ . � � I �. � t, , . �, , ,�'' , ._.r.. ; ',, ;, 3' _ �I '. , `�: �, � t ,. „. . - , . ,. • , r , . � � . ^ ' ..s �,- b�-- ___... _ z�>g ,� �L� \ ... • - �, '� - ' '3► jLi . _ * n� , r � , . , _ ' ;�� n � , ,_ � A'O _ � ` � . p !1� �� ' , . M � , ' �v. � , , y,($ . � ' ._,.�.��1 � t q 1 ",8 A� `�. a"a'. . . , - � �' � �: J�!, ,r� ►•� � , , , , I� �" r� ' EXHIBIT 6 Proposed Alternative Utility Easement � 3 w � � � z � N H � � N \ �� / w � � - - - N � � � c � � ai c o � z I � O +� O aU m o � � w — f� .� c_ I_ � � ai � �� o — �, � � _ � � Q> � L Y > �— � � � � � � - - - � � N � � � � � � v � � mQ z 0 �o � ��o � `'�°� � x d� � � w W z � w � o � H o � � `� o � w d � � � c�v � � � � � �—�' � � � N� oza o � � � oU z � Q � � w ¢ o � M � a � Q �"' r--� � � � � i--� � � 4�}�� w � � � � � � F a � � �� ' � w �o "� � � �,� 4�' ti� �j?p � EXHIBIT C Form of Partial Release of Easement Return Address: City Clerk's Office City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton,WA 98057 Partial Release of Easement Property Tax Parcel Number:7791000050 Project File#:PRM-26-0029 Street Intersection:Shelton Ave NE/NE 17th St Reference Number(s)of Documents assigned or released:197912030596 Additional reference numbers are on page Grantor(s): Grantee(s): 1. City of Renton,a Municipal Corporation 1. Jennifer M. Saechao 2. The Grantor,as the owner of an easement acquired from City of Renton Ordinance No. 3378 dated on 11/26/79 , recorded under King County Recording Number 7912030596 of King County,State of Washington,over real property described below: q utility easement encumbering the following described property: LOT 19, SIERRA TERRACE DIVISION NO. 1,ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOL. 76 OF PLATS, PGS 53-54, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY,WA; TOGETHER WTIH THAT PTN OF VACATED 131 ST AVE SE ADJOINING OR ABUTTING THEREON,VACATED BY ORDINACE NO. 3378, RECORDING NO. 7912030596, EXCEPT ANY PTN LYING EAST OF THE CENTERLINE OF SAID 131ST AVE S The CITY OF RENTON does hereby release the portion of real property described in attached Exhibit A and depicted in attached Exhibit B from the above described easement. The foregoing release shall not otherwise impair the rights of the Grantor acquired under the above described easement,which rights shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,said City has caused this instrument to be executed by the Mayor and attested to by the City Clerk this_day of ,20_ MAYOR CITY CLERK Notary Seal must be within box STATE OF WASHINGTON )SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary(Print) My appointment expires: Dated: Page 1 of 3 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF EASEMENT TO BE RELEASED THAT PORTION OF VACATED 1315T AVENUE SOUTHEAST ADJOINING LOT 19, SIERRA TERRACE DIVISION NO. 1, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 76 OF PLATS, PAGES 53 AND 54, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, EXCEPT ANY PORTION LYING EAST OF THE CENTERLINE OF SAID 1315T AVENUE SOUTHEAST. SAID PORTION WAS VACATED BY ORDINANCE NUMBER 3378 AND RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 7912030596. SITUATE IN THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4,SECTION 4,TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE S EAST,W.M.. ��OWDEIV A ti �F �"S�t�l O'v �� _ ��''a'�'� �a� � t��P 57176 �� Gt STE4'� I�L LAl`1� 11/17/25 � 3 w � � � z r� N H d= N � \ \ W N � � \ \ � � � � _ - -� ; � � � � W � �-- _ ___ � � Z � o � � � o m � o � . � .� o v � o � � � � ,ZO'8L 3 „10,69.00 N � sQ> � F � l0 > pp N O r^ � 3 � � � �+J �n > �n � Ln N N N� N T 0�0 y � m Q Z � �� ,OL'89 3 „10,65.00 N � � z �� o�� H oNo ,� � N �� W N lol M 'oMj 3 � � W _ ,� o o�� a x w � v��s �Q� �, �' ° � W � N � t/1 O (=Q � °� � r� � o �' C`3 � F o I�I Z J C� Z � ,-7-� � � �p O� 1-1 rl F�-1 ~� (� w F" p O� � � U� W Q � � GON w � � � � l� 0 0 � W � � � � N � W OOw p ,� �pFU ZW 3 „10,69.00 N o z � m F" � � a � Q � � � � Q.��}�� P� [�1G�y, �i co w � Q e � F O � � �� " O � � � � F-� �j.�O 'Q'�'ti f EXHIBIT F Copy of recorded Ordinance No. 3378 COUNTY Of KIIV� ) ��} '��~,---_.__ � - _ _ ��n ; `----__,,.,_ �``: �_ � �,��1,(,�.j�.�. � s��:l�_�}..1�,City C}erk ia end,ft�r t7k�, i�y of,i�nton, , � 'I'�►' VVasMngton, do hereby Cet h 'the fo�gotr�g Ordinance ig a�ue �td.cor�ect ��' � , a ,�.,;. copy of Or�inanee No.._� �.._,...of tRe City of Renfon, as i�8�p2ar5`Cur fil; ` ` ` � � � - �� n my atfiee, a�nd do furth� certffy�that ttt�,:Sei�e�has� beeri p�bshe�#�aecOrdm� , s � . - � � � � � ,:: - �� to�law.� } � 7 , = ' In Witness Wbereof f hq've Mereunta sei'my hond and affixed the sEal of the � � . ' �--� ,, Clty of Renton, this-----:s.�.r�.._------d'�'or+-L✓-��EL11�CK..�'_`.r--��. .�,': CITY QF RENTOIV, WAS ..�_p�c�y ae�k �:.:�; ; � ORDINANCE NQ. �37�� ..:a '^ AN ORDINANCE .OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTO�i_ .� '�`�� ` VACATING A PORTION OF TACOMA AVENUE N.E. , �.� ��`-`+ `` (VAC-17-79) VALI..�Y INVESTMENT PRQPERTIES/ ��`,, ROBERT C. OI�SQN �" . :�' . WHEREAS a proper petition for vacating a portion of �' `' Tacoma Avenue N .E. NoXth of N>.E . 17�h St. between Shelton � ` ,� �' Or 6venue N.E. & Unian Ave. :d.E. , Renton, Ki�g County, Washington, �'�+ t,C') � � was duly filed with the City Clerk Qn- or �laout August 15, 1g7�, �; 0 �.: N .�... and said petition �a�ing been sigr�ed by a�mers representing more �:: " �� - than two-thirds of the property abutting upon such street sought , . , � to be vacated; and [JHEREAS the City Council �ay Resalution rlo. 2292 passed and approved on August 27 , I979 , and after due investigation, did fix and determine the Ist day of �ctober, 1.979,at the hour P � of 8: QO P.M. in the Citq Gouncil Chambers o� �he City o� Renton to be the tiine anc� pl.ace for a publzc heazing , �hereon, and the City Clerk having given due notice af' such hearing in the manner : pravided by law, and a21 persons having been heard appearing in ' favor or in opposition thereto ; and WHEREAS the Department o� Public Works �nd the Planning Department of the City of Renton having duly considered said Y petition for said vaeation, � and having found same to �e �n the public interest and for the public b�en�fit, and no injury or damage to any person or properties will result fzom such vaeations , :�4W THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON , WASHINGTON, `D0 ORDAIN AS FOLLOW� : SECTIQN I : The following des�ribed portion �� treet , to-wit . .. . �. . � - - ' -- • .. .... _ . . , . - . .. _ .. y --- � - - - -�� i � , y, r SECTION II : The City Council hereby elects to charge a fee of 51 , 203. 50 to Petitioner-Owners , said amount not exceeding one-halt of the City' s appraisal of the right-of-way interest herein vacated, and such charge being reasonable and proper . SECTION III : This Ordinance shall be effective upon its `� passage , approval and five days after its publication. CT�� , � O A certified copy af this Ordinance shall be filed with � the Office of Records and Elections , King County, and as otherwise � grovided by law. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 26th day of November, 1979 . � , De ore�s��e , _i _y C er APPROVED $Y THE MAYOR this 26th day of Notaember�, 1979 . � .s� �. _x°•. w4t... �Y�. t:�i1_�'--..____.__. Barbara Y. Shinpach, rlayor Pro tem Approved as to form: f'ti.,.t1ti`�='^-<-.�' `� 1��f"i-�+�,r�,. Lawrence J. Wa ren, City Attorney Date of Publicatlon : Novembe�- 30, 1979 . 1 � ` . � � ' .. .. :� F, . - .. � � . . � i , . � . � . . . . � '��'� Ordiiiance No. 3378 . . �X 1�-�i C3 1 i � , That portion of undesignated City o£ �cent�rt stre�t ri^t r .��_w:.�v h:,vin�; a width of 50" ft. (known as I.31sr �"v`. `�,E ner t.�L ��; Co�.xnty' Grid for nurnberin� street) is :s zru�.�.ka<; �rith�.n �:;.i� pl_�G of Sierra Terra�� DiviSion No. 1 as rccord�>c? iri �'pL�rq� �F :� � � plats �ages 53 and 54 recor4s oi Kina; C"t,; ,.:v 4' ::��,.ri?ttn . ��.y�� CT �o�:�herl.y of t�i� mast sauth�rly line vi Lo4 "::"� , c�aUr_ �� +h�z ?::': 0 line of Lot 19, and north of the north r i.�,4�t-c�i-ta�.y p£` 1Y c '.? �; :;Y � extended and wc�st of the west line of L�t �'�J �,f sai�: ��t. O . N As situated within the SE I/4 of S«�tiori �+, Tc�wnship 2� tv. , �:sc-,^.��x ' 0� E. , WM � � • r � � � � . � � � � z , � o� om z° y � � b y O 2 . � O . A� b c •- � � i��, ' � . < ' . � � �^r. . . " ' Ordinance No. 337$ � �G �y 't''} , _ � , ��:- � . �' • I 301 � � - +Q , { z;�.5 1 . . ' �^� � , i ns -ai �' ¢ ' ---•.. 0�, 4oN.. + /0 , � � - 1 �, ,'� \ ^ , � . v9 , C�1 � �. _ �� . ?�� C�? �. , ..- ��, p� � �: _..- � ._ _____.. _ � �a8 � ' " : . ' o .�Q�,,P Q R�� c o V ,. � � - ' ` � $`�'`� , . � ' .' � � _ �� . �RAF� �• � �/ l�, f_ � � " r�� rca, � � � �` 2�Q4• Q� , . ^ � � r� G'�'I'kC .�� (r;�3� -��_ �Z , '^ v t�5 °' � , , i ;' o� � �► �e!_..` �: � Z , „ , , .� �� `� ��y�. � , i ----- -- . . : . . �r �- _ -�_�... '� s_�4 9� 4� � � �. . �, � . r,,'rt � ,',::(,.- ^ " ?i � 9 � z pr.. � + (1j, �o� , �'��W�► q Z,l �� 1 r;,..s--'�.- � •' �. � 2B,J �,�_.-^'� 3�S � i -.ts. � .�05 �i _ ` ' .�'�'� z�e ' t /4-93 �. 9-2-/9 .�l3G+T � _ " . � .,. .S'..r . �GG' P. � �4�-0 7�f�—/.�O'�4..57� �1� .-- � -__ _ :� ._.. _ � ._ _.. -�� ... .1='.._ __ Y ..._ ..-,.} --- -�-=�-,�':�ac'^,�: • m.__ _. � - \""' � o � 7s 90 ir.�e rs �o :C ; .. . _ � t-0 . m , > �f 2 5 Z.S � � 'A� �' (Y� � Y11► pt �' ► ui , � f ? , 1� � �P a Z qi; � : b , o ' � ' z go : ct V. �. _ ' � �8 � o N :a�,+'��w-� ' c0 � � � v �-; o.�n�''-�8,�1�,� , . z � hG ' �� • �G• �✓.BB�t4 32 it! _.,.� �J qa' . �3 r � � ,�'� '� �`w^ � �1 i I.o�+`;d I M �3� � 259 _ __.. � �`_`� � � � O .!D ,-,5 ,�as _. � U /Fj V� ��'. . � (,v ' , O A, , 9./ .,i /O 1, M it ••s vJ- _ oo,�a . N V� .�;&�d��.� �.c . ;� , ' '� . ✓. � ' �z�t e - Fj ,� �P. . 'r , . r a p . f�6 0 � � . `� � ;2� q � , . � � p'\� `,,'irO.. �� ; '1s�z t, a� . �oo�o � Jp � ,�.��_...,.... - �4 s'* '� 'Z ' ',�" o0 9r+ ' = ti' ' !� `-- :' .. , .. s�7� " , � • ,rxai' � :`,tt�+l � � . f" � � � ��sts�, �� N.119• 2wC 3'l,sw' fi ,�;i� � r ,� y. Q t �$�� , 0 �� ^ ` � � • v I�• ' 4� y�y , . p(!?0 � � ! p � _' � fr" �� O,A?p •. ., .. ? ' . � :'` � n�j � /Z .��fG t . � I OD1a Z � ��gp 1 �.., �v ,. ' . e � ? p �:,,�,/7 ' � �� .o` 4 � C O O. ' , �y ,. � p �;ee•i.o.• .`,. - y s �, b � �y �s N0 � ts tar .:e�s.rs .�,.,� � ooSo . �'�� ` � , �� Cx � Q � � j $+►; ; ;��w, ' r.e.s zZ �A4' � �� N. ''y: �'C. . �k , ,� � � �� , • . +c ` Z6 ��y a Sy� M!��+ n q �� y o,..,o,b:: ; �.�' -Q , « (� � p � o l �o s'46+�{�1 / �� . v o/2'G `�4 �' ,�9. F� S ,* . �,�� T. �. . .. ,�' - -�•,� - ioR�9 ^• da.os.s.>-.,c � $Er.r ioU.7 '�.1 n�.a9 <•� rs.�v z .� s .. I � , , � �, � '.��.7-� v � ,�V.�•or �a•v. _ ' t�� lt }�`" � 30 ,� i � 1__. oi3 � v . , _ � , " /MR1�;7id. � � , ,�-��_; IF' � t + �"� ;'`i + !.i � , e� a� . �' zg � � �:° � . • h � o��. � ;� � � � � � - �a..,��3�,� ►.� . z Q ..�� ,,,,� �--, c .I e�-� ` � �>�.,.� .. � . _ , �„ � � ' � "��, 29�S0 � � h . ' + _��T�� o re�o �q/t. .,. , . , Q �c'� /o� 9Y� . SS � vv dh9•o,s.,.ao.v-.� � '�' .S; r9c9 ;E7 A-32�1: - !�6'4-�� ,;Y..-:._,__ 1;,...�.`'` � ��F � �►.:._ 3 �_,.�+�� `� �b'> ._ � .o� ..rn V � ` Q� � RO�.Iav9�:, '.._..� _�...� �".t'll g O'r/ { . _ -. ;4 .� t� • SUBJECT/TITLE: Agreement with Tetra Tech, Inc.for Big Soos Creek at 116th Ave SE Sediment Control Project RECOMMENDED ACTION: Refer to Utilities Committee DEPARTMENT: Public Works STAFF CONTACT: Kevin Evans, Civil Engineer III EXT.: 7264 . . . . • The agreement for design services with Tetra Tech, Inc. is$298,671.The approved 2026 project budget for the Big Soos Creek at 116t"Ave SE Sediment Control project (427.475614) is $500,000 and there is sufficient budget to fund this agreement. � • • � � Significant sedimentation has been observed in the Big Soos Creek channel from 116th Ave SE to SE Petrovitsky Road, coupled with excessive vegetation growth and reduced conveyance capacity of the channel that increases risk of flooding.The objective of the Big Soos Creek at 116th Ave SE Sediment Control project is to reduce sediment deposition in the channel to reduce flood risk while considering the challenges associated with fish passage, private property, long- term maintenance, and the proposed Soos Creek Watershed fine sediment Total Maximum Daily Load limit(TMDL). This TMDL was submitted by Ecology to the EPA for approval on December 30, 2025, and compels Renton and otherjurisdictions within the watershed to implement stormwater structural controls to reduce peak flows and fine sediment discharge to Big Soos Creek. Additionally, Big Soos Creek extends through multiple private properties in this reach which presents a challenge and limits sediment control opportunities to only the public right-of-way. Per city policy 250-02, the Surface Water Utility reviewed SOQs from 10 firms on the MRSC Roster under the Civil Engineering Design category as part of a consultant selection process for three projects. After scoring SOQs, and interviewing the four top scoring firms in August 2025,Tetra Tech, Inc. was selected as the most qualified firm to provide engineering design services for this project. To improve understanding of sedimentation patterns and rates in this reach, and to define future capital projects that would reduce fine sediment discharge to Big Soos Creek, the agreement proposed for execution covers the first phase of the project. The project will be separated into three phases to allow for the scope of future phases to be based on the results/success of previous phases.This first phase will include initial evaluation 1 and preliminary design. Services required in this phase consist of project management, data collection and review, preliminary survey, hydrologic evaluation, alternatives analysis, 30% design of stormwater improvements along 116t"Ave SE between SE 168t"St and SE Petrovitsky Road, and permit pathway review. Data collection and review will include publicly available GIS data, as-built documentation, Soos Creek Fine Sediments TMDL, site reconnaissance, and stormwater sampling. Hydrologic evaluation will include delineation of major tributary basins, assessment of existing conditions, development of a continuous simulation using the Western Washington Hydrology Model (WWHM), identification of sediment accumulation "hotspoY' locations, and development of a stormwater technical memorandum. The VWVHM model will represent hydrologic conditions with and without conceptual design elements and will be used to compute water quality design flows, compute peak flows by return period, and evaluate stormwater Low Impact Develoment(LID) Best Management Practice (BMP) performance. Future phases will likely include the final design of stormwater improvements, with possible water quality design grant funding through the Department of Ecology Stormwater Financial Assistance Program. � � • � � • Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the Agreement with Tetra Tech, Inc. in the amount of$298,671 for engineering services for Big Soos Creek at 116th Ave SE Sediment Control Project Phase 1. 2 � ,�' � AGREEMENT FOR BIG SOOS CREEK AT 116TH AVE SE SEDIMENT CONTROL THIS AGREEMENT, dated for reference purposes only as January 1, 2026, is by and between the City of Renton (the "City"), a Washington municipal corporation, and Tetra Tech, Inc. ("Consultant"),a Washington corporation.The City and the Consultant are referred to collectively in this Agreement as the "Parties." Once fully executed by the Parties,this Agreement is effective as of the last date signed by both parties. 1. Scope of Work: Consultant agrees to provide engineering services associated with reducing sediment discharge to Big Soos Creek from 116th Ave SE to SE Petrovitsky Road, as specified in Exhibit A, which is attached and incorporated herein and may hereinafter be referred to as the "Work." 2. Chan�es in Scope of Work: The City, without invalidating this Agreement, may order changes to the Work consisting of additions,deletions or modifications.Any such changes to the Work shall be ordered by the City in writing and the Compensation shall be equitably adjusted consistent with the rates set forth in Exhibits B and C or as otherwise mutually agreed by the Parties. 3. Time of Performance: Consultant shall commence performance of the Agreement pursuant to the schedule(s) set forth in Exhibit A. All Work shall be performed by no later than March 31, 2027. 4. Compensation: A. Amount. Total compensation to Consultant for Work provided pursuant to this Agreement shall not exceed $298,671, plus any applicable state and local sales taxes. Compensation shall be paid based upon Work actually performed according to the rate(s)or amounts specified in Exhibits B and C.The Consultant agrees that any hourly or flat rate charged by it for its Work shall remain locked at the negotiated rate(s) unless otherwise agreed to in writing or provided in Exhibits B and C. Except as specifically provided herein, the Consultant shall be solely responsible for payment of any taxes imposed as a result of the performance and payment of this Agreement. B. Method of Payment. On a monthly or no less than quarterly basis during any quarter in which Work is performed,the Consultant shall submit a voucher or invoice in a form specified by the City, including a description of what Work has been performed, the name of the personnel performing such Work, and any hourly labor charge rate for such personnel. The Consultant shall also submit a final bill upon completion of all Work. Payment shall be made by the City for Work performed within thirty (30) calendar days after receipt and approval by the appropriate City representative of the voucher or invoice. If the Consultant's performance does not meet the requirements of this Agreement, the Consultant will correct or modify its performance to comply with the Agreement. The City may withhold payment for work that does not meet the requirements of this Agreement. C. Effect of Payment. Payment for any part of the Work shall not constitute a waiver by the City of any remedies it may have against the Consultant for failure of the Consultant to perform the Work or for any breach of this Agreement by the Consultant. D. Non-Appropriation of Funds. If sufficient funds are not appropriated or allocated for payment under this Agreement for any future fiscal period, the City shall not be obligated to make payments for Work or amounts incurred after the end of the current fiscal period, and this Agreement will terminate upon the completion of all remaining Work for which funds are allocated. No penalty or expense shall accrue to the City in the event this provision applies. 5. Termination: A. The City reserves the right to terminate this Agreement at any time, with or without cause by giving ten (10) calendar days' notice to the Consultant in writing. In the event of such termination or suspension, all finished or unfinished documents,data,studies, worksheets, models and reports, or other material prepared by the Consultant pursuant to this Agreement shall be submitted to the City, if any are required as part of the Work. B. In the event this Agreement is terminated by the City,the Consultant shall be entitled to payment for all hours worked to the effective date of termination, less all payments previously made. If the Agreement is terminated by the City after partial performance of Work for which the agreed compensation is a fixed fee, the City shall pay the Consultant an equitable share of the fixed fee. This provision shall not prevent the City from seeking any legal remedies it may have for the violation or nonperformance of any of the provisions of this Agreement and such charges due to the City shall be deducted from the final payment due the Consultant. No payment shall be made by the City for any expenses incurred or work done following the effective date of termination unless authorized in advance in writing by the City. 6. Warranties And Ri�ht To Use Work Product: Consultant represents and warrants that Consultant will perform all Work identified in this Agreement in a professional and �� PAGE 2 OF 10 workmanlike manner and in accordance with all reasonable and professional standards and laws. Compliance with professional standards includes, as applicable, performing the Work in compliance with applicable City standards or guidelines (e.g. design criteria and Standard Plans for Road, Bridge and Municipal Construction). Professional engineers shall certify engineering plans, specifications, plats, and reports, as applicable, pursuant to RCW 18.43.070. Consultant further represents and warrants that all final work product created for and delivered to the City pursuant to this Agreement shall be the original work of the Consultant and free from any intellectual property encumbrance which would restrict the City from using the work product. Consultant grants to the City a non- exclusive, perpetual right and license to use, reproduce, distribute, adapt, modify, and display all final work product produced pursuant to this Agreement. The City's or other's adaptation, modification or use of the final work products other than for the purposes of this Agreement shall be without liability to the Consultant. The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. 7. Record Maintenance: The Consultant shall maintain accounts and records, which properly reflect all direct and indirect costs expended and Work provided in the performance of this Agreement and retain such records for as long as may be required by applicable Washington State records retention laws, but in any event no less than six years after the termination of this Agreement. The Consultant agrees to provide access to and copies of any records related to this Agreement as required by the City to audit expenditures and charges and/orto comply with the Washington State Public Records Act (Chapter 42.56 RCW). The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. 8. Public Records Compliance: To the full extent the City determines necessary to comply with the Washington State Public Records Act,Consultant shall make a due diligent search of all records in its possession or control relating to this Agreement and the Work, including, but not limited to, e-mail, correspondence, notes, saved telephone messages, recordings, photos, or drawings and provide them to the City for production. In the event Consultant believes said records need to be protected from disclosure, it may, at Consultant's own expense, seek judicial protection. Consultant shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City for all costs, including attorneys' fees, attendant to any claim or litigation related to a Public Records Act request for which Consultant has responsive records and for which Consultant has withheld records or information contained therein, or not provided them to the City in a timely manner. Consultant shall produce for distribution any and all records responsive to the Public Records Act request in a timely manner, unless those records are protected by court order. The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. 9. Independent Contractor Relationship: �� PAGE 3 OF 10 A. The Consultant is retained by the City only for the purposes and to the extent set forth in this Agreement.The nature of the relationship between the Consultant and the City during the period of the Work shall be that of an independent contractor, not employee.The Consultant, not the City,shall have the power to control and direct the details, manner or means of Work. Specifically, but not by means of limitation, the Consultant shall have no obligation to work any particular hours or particular schedule, unless otherwise indicated in the Scope of Work or where scheduling of attendance or performance is mutually arranged due to the nature of the Work. Consultant shall retain the right to designate the means of performing the Work covered by this agreement, and the Consultant shall be entitled to employ other workers at such compensation and such other conditions as it may deem proper, provided, however, that any contract so made by the Consultant is to be paid by it alone, and that employing such workers, it is acting individually and not as an agent for the City. B. The City shall not be responsible for withholding or otherwise deducting federal income tax or Social Security or contributing to the State Industrial Insurance Program, or otherwise assuming the duties of an employer with respect to Consultant or any employee of the Consultant. C. If the Consultant is a sole proprietorship or if this Agreement is with an individual,the Consultant agrees to notify the City and complete any required form if the Consultant retired under a State of Washington retirement system and agrees to indemnify any losses the City may sustain through the Consultant's failure to do so. 10. Hold Harmless: The Consultant agrees to release, indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City, elected officials, employees, officers, representatives, and volunteers from any and all claims, demands, actions, suits, causes of action, arbitrations, mediations, proceedings, judgments, awards, injuries, damages, liabilities, taxes, losses, fines, fees, penalties, expenses, attorney's or attorneys' fees, costs, and/or litigation expenses to or by any and all persons or entities, arising from, resulting from, or related to the negligent acts, errors or omissions of the Consultant in its performance of this Agreement or a breach of this Agreement by Consultant, except for that portion of the claims caused by the City's sole negligence. Should a court of competent jurisdiction determine that this agreement is subject to RCW 4.24.115, (Validity of agreement to indemnify against liability for negligence relative to construction,alteration, improvement,etc.,of structure or improvement attached to real estate...) then, in the event of liability for damages arising out of bodily injury to persons or damages to property caused by or resulting from the concurrent negligence of the Consultant and the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers, Consultant's liability shall be only to the extent of Consultant's negligence. �� PAG E 4 OF 10 It is further specifically and expressly understood that the indemnification provided in this Agreement constitute Consultant's waiver of immunity under the Industrial Insurance Act, RCW Title 51, solely for the purposes of this indemnification. The Parties have mutually negotiated and agreed to this waiver. The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. 11. Gifts and Conflicts: The City's Code of Ethics and Washington State law prohibit City employees from soliciting, accepting, or receiving any gift, gratuity or favor from any person, firm or corporation involved in a contract or transaction. To ensure compliance with the City's Code of Ethics and state law,the Consultant shall not give a gift of any kind to City employees or officials. Consultant also confirms that Consultant does not have a business interest or a close family relationship with any City officer or employee who was, is, or will be involved in selecting the Consultant, negotiating or administering this Agreement, or evaluating the Consultant's performance of the Work. 12. City of Renton Business License: Unless exempted by the Renton Municipal Code, Consultant shall obtain a City of Renton Business License prior to performing any Work and maintain the business license in good standing throughout the term of this agreement with the City. Information regarding acquiring a city business license can be found at: https://www.rentonwa.�ov/Tax Information regarding State business licensing requirements can be found at: https://dor.wa.�ov/doin�-business/re�ister-my-business 13. Insurance: Consultant shall secure and maintain: A. Commercial general liability insurance in the minimum amounts of $1,000,000 for each occurrence/$2,000,000 aggregate for the Term of this Agreement. B. In the event that Work delivered pursuant to this Agreement either directly or indirectly involve or require Professional Services, Professional Liability, Errors and Omissions coverage shall be provided with minimum limits of $1,000,000 per occurrence. "Professional Services", for the purpose of this section, shall mean any Work provided by a licensed professional or Work that requires a professional standard of care. C. Workers' compensation coverage, as required by the Industrial Insurance laws of the State of Washington, shall also be secured. �� PAGE 5 OF 10 D. Commercial Automobile Liabilityfor owned, leased, hired or non-owned, leased, hired or non-owned, with minimum limits of $1,000,000 per occurrence combined single limit, if there will be any use of Consultant's vehicles on the City's Premises by or on behalf of the City, beyond normal commutes. E. Consultant shall name the City as an Additional Insured on its commercial general liability policy on a non-contributory primary basis. The City's insurance policies shall not be a source for payment of any Consultant liability, nor shall the maintenance of any insurance required by this Agreement be construed to limit the liability of Consultant to the coverage provided by such insurance or otherwise limit the City's recourse to any remedy available at law or in equity. F. Subject to the City's review and acceptance, a certificate of insurance showing the proper endorsements, shall be delivered to the City before performing the Work. G. Consultant shall provide the City with written notice of any policy cancellation, within two (2) business days of their receipt of such notice. 14. Delays: Consultant is not responsible for delays caused by factors beyond the Consultant's reasonable control. When such delays beyond the Consultant's reasonable control occur,the City agrees the Consultant is not responsible for damages, nor shall the Consultant be deemed to be in default of the Agreement. 15. Successors and Assi�ns: Neither the City nor the Consultant shall assign, transfer or encumber any rights, duties or interests accruing from this Agreement without the written consent of the other. 16. Notices: Any notice required under this Agreement will be in writing, addressed to the appropriate party at the address which appears below (as modified in writing from time to time by such party), and given personally, by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, by facsimile or by nationally recognized overnight courier service.Time period for notices shall be deemed to have commenced upon the date of receipt, EXCEPT facsimile delivery will be deemed to have commenced on the first business day following transmission. Email and telephone may be used for purposes of administering the Agreement, but should not be used to give any formal notice required by the Agreement. CITY OF RENTON CONSULTANT Kevin Evans Alex Buescher 1055 South Grady Way 1750 South Harbor Way, Suite #400 Renton, WA 98057 Portland, OR 97201 Phone: (425) 430-7264 Phone: (503) 727-8069 �� PAGE 6 OF 10 krevans@rentonwa.gov alex.buescher@tetratech.com 17. Discrimination Prohibited: Except to the extent permitted by a bona fide occupational qualification, the Consultant agrees as follows: A. Consultant, and Consultant's agents, employees, representatives, and volunteers with regard to the Work performed or to be performed under this Agreement, shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color, sex, religion, nationality, creed, marital status, sexual orientation or preference, age (except minimum age and retirement provisions), honorably discharged veteran or military status, or the presence of any sensory, mental or physical handicap, unless based upon a bona fide occupational qualification in relationship to hiring and employment, in employment or application for employment, the administration of the delivery of Work or any other benefits under this Agreement, or procurement of materials or supplies. B. The Consultant will take affirmative action to insure that applicants are employed and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, creed, color, national origin, sex, age, sexual orientation, physical, sensory or mental handicaps, or marital status. Such action shall include, but not be limited to the following employment, upgrading, demotion or transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination, rates of pay or other forms of compensation and selection for training. C. If the Consultant fails to comply with any of this Agreement's non-discrimination provisions, the City shall have the right, at its option, to cancel the Agreement in whole or in part. D. The Consultant is responsible to be aware of and in compliance with all federal, state and local laws and regulations that may affect the satisfactory completion of the project, which includes but is not limited to fair labor laws, worker's compensation, and Title VI of the Federal Civil Rights Act of 1964, and will comply with City of Renton Council Resolution Number 4085. 18. Miscellaneous: The parties hereby acknowledge: A. The City is not responsible to train or provide training for Consultant. B. Consultant will not be reimbursed for job related expenses except to the extent specifically agreed within the attached exhibits. C. Consultant shall furnish all tools and/or materials necessary to perform the Work except to the extent specifically agreed within the attached exhibits. �� PAGE 7 OF 10 D. In the event special training, licensing, or certification is required for Consultant to provide Work he/she will acquire or maintain such at his/her own expense and, if Consultant employs, sub-contracts, or otherwise assigns the responsibility to perform the Work, said employee/sub-contractor/assignee will acquire and or maintain such training, licensing, or certification. E. This is a non-exclusive agreement and Consultant is free to provide his/her Work to other entities, so long as there is no interruption or interference with the provision of Work called for in this Agreement. F. Consultant is responsible for his/her own insurance, including, but not limited to health insurance. G. Consultant is responsible for his/her own Worker's Compensation coverage as well as that for any persons employed by the Consultant. 19. Other Provisions: A. Approval Authority. Each individual executing this Agreement on behalf of the City and Consultant represents and warrants that such individuals are duly authorized to execute and deliver this Agreement on behalf of the City or Consultant. B. General Administration and Mana�ement. The City's project manager is Kevin Evans. In providing Work, Consultant shall coordinate with the City's contract manager or his/her designee. C. Amendment and Modification. This Agreement may be amended only by an instrument in writing, duly executed by both Parties. D. Conflicts. In the event of any inconsistencies between Consultant proposals and this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall prevail. Any exhibits/attachments to this Agreement are incorporated by reference only to the extent of the purpose for which they are referenced within this Agreement. To the extent a Consultant prepared exhibit conflicts with the terms in the body of this Agreement or contains terms that are extraneous to the purpose for which it is referenced, the terms in the body of this Agreement shall prevail and the extraneous terms shall not be incorporated herein. E. Governin� Law. This Agreement shall be made in and shall be governed by and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington and the City of Renton. Consultant and all of the Consultant's employees shall perform the Work in accordance with all applicable federal, state, county and city laws, codes and ordinances. �� PAGE 8 OF 10 F. Joint Draftin� Effort. This Agreement shall be considered for all purposes as prepared by the joint efforts of the Parties and shall not be construed against one party or the other as a result of the preparation, substitution, submission or other event of negotiation, drafting or execution. G. Jurisdiction and Venue. Any lawsuit or legal action brought by any party to enforce or interpret this Agreement or any of its terms or covenants shall be brought in the King County Superior Court for the State of Washington at the Maleng Regional Justice Center in Kent, King County,Washington, or its replacement or successor. Consultant hereby expressly consents to the personal and exclusive jurisdiction and venue of such court even if Consultant is a foreign corporation not registered with the State of Washington. H. Severabilitv. A court of competent jurisdiction's determination that any provision or part of this Agreement is illegal or unenforceable shall not cancel or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement, which shall remain in full force and effect. I. Sole and Entire A�reement. This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the Parties and any representations or understandings, whether oral or written, not incorporated are excluded. J. Time is of the Essence. Time is of the essence of this Agreement and each and all of its provisions in which performance is a factor. Adherence to completion dates set forth in the description of the Work is essential to the Consultant's performance of this Agreement. K. Third-Partv Beneficiaries. Nothing in this Agreement is intended to, nor shall be construed to give any rights or benefits in the Agreement to anyone other than the Parties, and all duties and responsibilities undertaken pursuant to this Agreement will be for the sole and exclusive benefit of the Parties and no one else. L. Bindin� Effect. The Parties each bind themselves, their partners, successors, assigns, and legal representatives to the other party to this Agreement, and to the partners, successors, assigns, and legal representatives of such other party with respect to all covenants of the Agreement. M. Waivers. All waivers shall be in writing and signed by the waiving party. Either party's failure to enforce any provision of this Agreement shall not be a waiver and shall not prevent either the City or Consultant from enforcing that provision or any other provision of this Agreement in the future. Waiver of breach of any provision of this Agreement shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any prior or subsequent breach unless it is expressly waived in writing. �� PAGE 9 OF 10 N. Counterparts. The Parties may execute this Agreement in any number of counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original, and all of which will together constitute this one Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have voluntarily entered into this Agreement as of the date last signed by the Parties below. CITY OF RENTON CONSULTANT By:_ By: _ Armondo Pavone Chuck Purnell Mayor Senior Project Manager Date Date Attest Jason A. Seth City Clerk Approved as to Legal Form By: Shane Moloney Renton City Attorney Contract Template Updated 5/21/2021 c,} � PAGE 10 OF 10 CITY OF RENTON PUBLIC WORKS SCOPE OF WORK BIG SOOS CREEK AT 116T" AVE SE SEDIMENT CONTROL BACKGROUND The City of Renton (City) contains within its municipal boundary the headwaters for Big Soos Creek and several tributary streams. Big Soos Creek is identified by the City as a "Type F" fish-bearing stream, and several species of salmon, including Chinook, Coho, Chum, and Steelhead, spawn and rear in the Soos Creek watershed. Additionally, the Washington Department of Ecology is also reviewing two different Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL)limitations on the Soos Creek Watershed:the first is a multi-parameter TMDL that will regulate temperature, dissolved oxygen, and bacteria, and the second TMDL will be specific to fine sediments. The City considers the implementation of these TMDLs to be an eventuality and seeks to prepare itself to manage its portion of the watershed accordingly. The City has identified a conveyance capacity issue in Big Soos Creek between 116th Avenue Southeast and Southeast Petrovitsky Road. Excess sedimentation in the channel and overgrown vegetation flanking the channel banks have reduced the conveyance capacity of the channel, and the channel's location primarily on private property presents a challenge for regular maintenance activities. To find a resolution to the reduced conveyance capacity in a manner that considers the challenges associated with fish passage, water quality, private property, and long-term maintenance considerations, the City has hired Tetra Tech, Inc. (Consultant) to conduct an alternatives analysis and perform the subsequent design of stormwater management Best Management Practices (BMPs)targeted at improving several key goals: • Improve the channel's flow conveyance capacity of Big Soos Creek in the project area. • Reduce the City's long-term maintenance burden in the project area. • Augment the City's permit management through identification of requirements associated with the future TMDLs, potentially including site-specific data collection, subwatershed modeling, and implementation of stormwater best management practices (BMPs). This scope of work presents the work to accomplish the City's goals in three (3) phases. The first phase of work is the subject of this contract,while the latter phases may be included in a future contract amendment, at the City's discretion. • Phase 1 — Initial Evaluation and Conclusions, 30% Design • Phase 2— Design and Permit Support(Future Amendment) • Phase 3— Bid Support and Services During Construction (Future Amendment) 116t"Avenue Southeast Stormwater Improvements Page 1 of 18 SERVICES - PHASE 1 : INITIAL EVALUATION AND CONCLUSIONS DURATION Phase 1 of this contract assumes a duration of 15 months, beginning on January 1St, 2026 and ending on March 31 St, 2027. TASK 1.1 — PROJECT MANAGEMENT The focus of this task is to maintain effective communication with the City's Project Manager and City staff, manage the project budget, and coordinate the timing of all tasks within this scope to ensure completion within the project schedule. 1. Prepare project plan defining staff responsibilities and schedules. 2. Conduct an internal project start-up meeting involving key team members at Tetra Tech offices. 3. Conduct a kickoff meeting with the City.Tetra Tech will take note of action items and confirm these items with the City via email. 4. Conduct up to 15 monthly check-in meetings, each up to 1 hour in duration, with the City. 5. The Consultant will provide to the City a Phase 1 project schedule within two (2) weeks of The Consultant receiving the notice to proceed. The schedule will show milestone dates and submittal dates to the City. The design schedule will be updated monthly over the project duration. 6. Ongoing project management and coordination with the project team, including subconsultants. Management functions including coordinating labor, meeting key scheduling milestones, and maintaining budget occurs within this task. 7. Preparation of 15 monthly progress reports which include a summary table comparing amount expended and remaining budget. Progress reports will identify any anticipated or current issues with any out-of-scope work, budget shortfalls, and provide suggested corrections. 8. Prepare a Project Management Plan (PMP) describing the procedures and protocol for execution of the various components of the work, organizational chart of the Consultant team and City staff, project team roles and responsibilities, internal and external communications plan, routing procedures for all project correspondence and deliverables, risk management plan, and quality assurance plan. Quality assurance plan documentation associated with this project. Assumptions 1. The kickoff meeting will be attended by up to two (2) Tetra Tech staff (which includes the project manager). The meeting will last up to two (2) hours. Tetra Tech will facilitate the meeting, prepare the meeting agenda, and prepare meeting notes. 2. The Consultant will prepare agendas and notes for the project kickoff meeting and check-in meetings. 3. Meetings will be held via Microsoft Teams or other digital meeting platform unless otherwise agreed upon by both the Consultant and the City or otherwise specified in the Scope of Work. 116t"Avenue Southeast Stormwater Improvements Page 2 of 18 Deliverables 1. Kickoff meeting and monthly check-in meeting notes. 2. Project Management Plan and project schedule, delivered electronically as a PDF document. 3. Monthly updates to the design schedule. 4. Monthly invoices and progress reports, delivered electronically as emails with invoices. 5. Subconsultant agreements, as applicable. 6. QA/QC documentation upon request. TASK 1.2 — DATA COLLECTION AND REVIEW The Consultant will collect and review existing data to support project analysis and design. The primary goal of this task is to synthesize existing data relevant to the project to inform the work conducted in other project tasks. This task will also identify data gaps where further investigation or data collection is necessary. The Consultant's work will include the following: Subtask 1.2.1 — Review of Existing Publicly-Available Data 1. Review and obtain publicly available Geographic Information System(GIS)data and City of Renton Maps (CORMAPS)web portal. a. Existing utilities (e.g., storm sewer, sanitary sewer, water main, dry utilities, overhead utilities, etc.). b. Existing topography (e.g., LiDAR datasets) c. Review of City Operations and Maintenance documentation, especially pertaining to maintenance of culverts along Big Soos Creek,vegetation management in Big Soos Creek, and operational practices related to street sweeping and winter ice control. d. Environmental data (e.g., critical areas, priority habitats and species, soils, etc.). 2. Obtain and review available as-built documentation pertaining to: a. The public right-of-way, including the roadways, culverts, and utilities. b. Private developments that contain project elements such as the stormwater conveyance networks, Big Soos Creek, or stormwater detention systems (both publicly and privately owned). 3. Obtain and review documents related to the Soos Creek Fine Sediments TMDL (where available), including: a. The Water Quality Improvement Report and Implementation Plan b. HSPF model c. Sediment data used for model calibration 4. Identify data gaps, assess whether those gaps should be filled,and propose methods of addressing such data gaps. Subtask 1.2.2—Site Reconnaissance and Sampling 1. Conduct site reconnaissance visits for the following: a. One (1) site visit for an initial review of the project drainage features, tributary basins, wetlands, and other critical areas in the project vicinity. 116t"Avenue Southeast Stormwater Improvements Page 3 of 18 2. Conduct stormwater sampling to measure flow and Total Suspended Solids (TSS) at select locations. Stormwater sampling will be conducted via sampling probes at each sample location. a. Stormwater sampling will be conducted using data logger probes or meters. TSS sampling will be conducted using a turbidity probe and will be calibrated to compute TSS concentrations based on 1 grab sample for each sampling location. b. Sampling locations will include: i. Outfall #OUT-847 (per CORMAPS) to Big Soos Creek on west side of 116t" Ave SE. ii. Catch Basin #135572 (per CORMAPS), located on the east side of 116t'' Ave SE at Big Soos Creek. iii. Outfall #OUT-0002 (per CORMAPS), located on the south side of SE 168t" St at Big Soos Creek. c. Two (2) Consultant staff will visit the sampling locations a total of two (2) times to collect grab samples for TSS calibration, to monitor the installation and removal the turbidity probes by the equipment vendor, and to collect the data from the sampling equipment. Assumptions 1. Tetra Tech shall be entitled to rely upon any information, data and documentation concerning the Project provided to it by the City or other parties, obtained from the City's GIS database, or that is generally available, as well as any statements and representations made by the City concerning the Project or the Services. In relying on such information, Tetra Tech shall have no obligation to investigate or independently verify the accuracy, timeliness, or completeness of such information. 2. The City will provide the Consultant with GIS data (shapefiles, geotiffs, etc.)from CORMAPS upon request by the Consultant. 3. The City will secure Rights-of-Entry where access to private property is necessary. Work on private property will not be performed without Rights-of-Entry. 4. Traffic control measures will not be necessary to support Consultant field work activities. The Consultant will exercise professional judgement regarding site safety, and will not perform field work activities at a site deemed to be unsafe. 5. The Consultant will not need special certifications, such as OSHA Confined Space, to conduct the field work activities. 6. The City will review draft deliverables and provide a single set of review comments and edits. Conflicting and ambiguous comments between City reviewers will be resolved prior to submitting to the Consultant. 116t"Avenue Southeast Stormwater Improvements Page 4 of 18 Deliverables 1. A draft and final technical memorandum summarizing the results of the data review, submitted electronically as a Portable Document Format (PDF). The memorandum will also document data gaps and potential collection activities. 2. Sampling summaries, including raw data, field logs, and computations. TASK 1.3 — PRELIMINARY SURVEY The Consultant will provide topographical data collection to support the Phase 1 analysis and design effort. Boundary line surveys, bathymetric surveys, and storm sewer inventory surveys are not included in the Phase 1 scope, but are anticipated for Phase 2 (design), depending on the results of the Phase 1 alternatives analysis. The approach will involve a mobile mapping system comprised of lidar and imagery sensors to support the planning and analysis activities associated with Phase 1 by providing the Consultant a desktop accessible lidar and panoramic imagery set. The advantage of using this approach means data will be collected at the posted speeds of the roadways that will not impede traffic or create any lane closures. The ConsultanYs work will include the following: Establish survey control for the project that will be used for data collection and planimetric data extraction efforts. This work includes the setting of six (6)survey control /mobile mapping targets. The Consultant will use Trimble GNSS/GPS and conventional survey methods to establish the control values: a. The Consultant will establish on-site survey control that will be used as the basis of this project. Control will be derived from Washington State Reference Network, NAD83 (2011), and NAVD88 datums, based upon Washington State Plane Coordinate System — North. b. The set of control targets will consist of a 2'x2' square painted white,with a mag nail set in the center of the square. c. The Consultant will use Trimble GNSS to establish coordinate values on each of the six (6) designated control points. d. The Consultant will use Trimble DiNi digital level to establish elevations across the control points. e. Units shall be the International Foot as established in 58.20.185 RCW. 2. Perform field surveying. The Consultant will use vehicle-mounted terrestrial lidar and imagery to scan public right-of-way corridors within the area shown in Figure 1. Panoramic imagery will be collected in 15-foot intervals traveling down the roadway. The right-of-way corridors to be scanned may include, but are not limited to: Prioritv Corridors: a. 116th Avenue Southeast d. Southeast 168th Street b. 117th Avenue Southeast e. Southeast 170th Street c. 118th Avenue Southeast f. Southeast Petrovitsky Road Secondary Corridors: a. 113t"Avenue Southeast e. Southeast 169t" Street b. 114t"Avenue Southeast f. Southeast 171St Street c. 114t" Lane Southeast g. Southeast 171 St Place d. 120t"Avenue Southeast h. Southeast 175t" Street 116t"Avenue Southeast Stormwater Improvements Page 5 of 18 3. Perform office processing and raw lidar data extraction. The Consultant will post process the datasets to the survey control to produce georeferenced lidar and imagery datasets. 4. Extract survey data to develop survey basemap to support 30% design (Task 1.6). a. Perform office processing and data extraction to develop a survey basemap. The survey basemap will include typical road features such as the road crown, gutter lines, flow lines, curb top and back, back of sidewalk, etc. The survey basemap will also include road paint lines and above ground appurtenances such as junction boxes, utility poles, and street signs, and building corners where a line-of-sight from the roadway exists. b. Perform office processing and data extraction to develop a 3D terrain model.The 3D terrain model will be supplemented with 2021 King County LiDAR terrain. c. Integrate City GIS data obtained under Task 1.2 into the survey basemap. Such data may include underground utilities, overhead utilities, and critical areas mapping. 116t"Avenue Southeast Stormwater Improvements Page 6 of 18 ('�� --'��- T r��A��A. • t ..v � .-�; -�-z_ .., _ - • � e �"� -Y �� ,_y'� �,.. t�'� . f*r �f�fi �, r`�yM�'� �� t, �# ',�.'�� JY..W� � � „� .� .•.:' � _ , r�--,. ,�J j �_. • ,,'� �"ra;�',�,:�� J� r ��r��- �`_�s.,;�*y PRIORITY CORRIDORS r�r 1 `� !' �.1 � i• � - {I r�,y, ` � y��a�..++-��M►_ r r� t�, �+.. w; �u� v�� H. , r� �N�..� �C.�{`r-F .,��.-� � _�_ r r � r•:- .�� '• � �� l ! Itr . �.4; ,. : , t ; � _ � � r �� ,� . . '� ', ' _ , ; ?'�� t'' �,..r r.�Y�.� � �y" - ��- I �•�s' _ �.� .'�;�� .�...aF-'�� . ��i�y� `�,:�, ';; ;:/ , ,j;,��':' yt ,a;.�� _';�,i:�'".:a � x,;�.. .., .�• SECONDARY CORRIDORS ' �t;'r�> ,�,7 2y,.��..�-ays� � ^+t t !.��'f!� 4. '�� T i � - _ ��'yJ� <� ' '.. ••tiJ r. _,.� � � .`+- � � " - • .� Y'1:jr�i _� F�,�`� , .F �j . ` -�e. 1'_ ►x'1_ S�: .�l'�'�"�' ♦ . �. .1� :' �4 .�. 4� � ,� > 4�f,�`y� +�,r�.r �� . -r,'�i: � ^�� ,. :�„� rc.��_ �!�'�,�.�_�'�� G�.M•{�: _.;�' C�.��•�7y; w��,'�'_,;.7; �.! • �..iM%i� � .i=�' .+::+�.�i��f�.1'� ~ �s�� -„�_ .Z. j t ; / r� • ,,,� �pl�.r. Y ' - t - � ,, . � �'}♦ ��:�.s 'S��,�. ��y S ' �-.�i��. ' , i !' ��,^pH-k'�f �- `"�t'� -- ��'�1� �.�F�� •,"�-�' .i�''��. �,RT� .- �. ._ �� ' {�� r. . �.y�^��'h �N � � 1 ��.r.. :�4'� � i �~:�� • ,.� .a �� 6) -y -- ��'��1,��.i.,t��F�'I :Ti� ��f ��,. �,�i.� -�R.f�. .�`� ��r i. 1 r` 1 . � ,� �';�., � � s. "1 � '� � . � �;r ��y+ t��,.i, � �..+�� ; �.. �,�.9�...` - .� rt,`4 �^'"�'�'C� �•t�� , 1�., j .� ,� �� ,, �_- _+�`Y�'7,�':�;� ��t � -�'�i� '-� >'�-s � '�'"y��A..'`T� i tl.'. S��A��`. . . x�kfy� �v y � �� -1 'C K ! .'. �..+� - c?i .,,'►.� )if '�q:f� •g- '�' '�� " � f A�1 �' ` �� ♦♦ � !` . ��4i �, ��_'. � .-�✓ ,r _ � � � / . . � , � .`•��fa � _� -�y � . 1 'ltil�..,��,� ,��s 1� ' , r � �t�� ' �Y'`�l�� }�:�� ,'n ; .�',Z'^_'��► � . � . � '' . � �� y `�s . �r �'�� -, r�-. j fi,}'r* K,tr� �• � . ,r: .� ;s� .i .1} a• ��e" _ ,!r r ' , _J. �J .,Y'k:tfi ,�. v •� �P T '! �• � �" �• � i . !��'K. yy K i` � -� .'� •�'� � . ,. . ti'� - . ,• '� ; '� ?o- •:�_i� _ -.�• � .y".^ ' �~ j�"��•� -'..l`- � itry 7f?��{'' � }�\. 1': �'� . l�, ` .a'�F�. Jr � - r. �_1`t �1 '.1, .J. •. :��. _ , . .T� A� _ '� L �_ :� � F� }�' * '.� - , ; _ . . � ,:,. i. - ♦ � 'i, II n�. �� _• , ''. • ��.g� \�1 • �.�, : • _ -Lr � ;'"._�� . .� " • [, T ' ^ i+tti�Y�+�+s�.ar,nr�,�+1+..j.,�A � F- S1 � ,w 4 '�f • •+ � ♦�.. ;��E,Sr��. +�'� ,� ��i! ''¢ ,';`�.? =� 1� � -'� . ,�! ._ �,, ,;.r �,, �._ �q J�� .=.,.^�„ _ _ ��i 4'� �� .._ �� , - �'�"'ra ♦ .•. "rr � i•,� ._ � yn �'�.,�{ _ � T�t,r. .•« .__ ¢hc�� '�� ~�.? i. �t'i ' �'`.rai� _' � ,,. .. � . `f 1�_� r _ � �},.� 1 ♦ ��..�-� '��, �~•' .. .S;. .. �r'�1� ` . A ti+"� , . �.�. ��'. �� ,��..�. — � . ._ :.� � - . . ��:w�rb '_ •,r_,re � , r}� -- �V... 7ty��.. . Y� .. �. 4•C.. 1 c .: ? � b �,r..J ._ _ -� - _ . _ YG` �. . : . . '� • r:�, d� �.:- .ai�: . . .. y.�.E _ _ I_ . _ <' . .•.� � ,�+ . .,d �� •, � ^`-. :fQ.:��t'��f• -_ . ��.i' r�. _. ,i�1t - .' ti� . ..•tt ��• � � .. . � 1� A s .� -�Z �.;. rr .� .-'X � Y}` � , t�./G� ;��R+be �.�, n% � �� i n.r �1 '� ,+�� r S. _.- � "Y�.}i� . � - �. }'.,i . r . �`. , ,,,�r��.x y�w'�i' �.� � J�� a f' t y � 'L � ..��. w�j,�r.1�,r� I��. �� s>� �� ,� . 1i��.�i, t ��5� �,x �,�_ � . �� L.-� ,.I�♦ ��f�ViA,. .-� �/'- �'��R,� �. '�.t, ��, � �t.,>:_�`P �.►�M��'.� �i •�•+�-��. R JM`��+ � -^� �+�Yy ,Mi•�� /•� � L . ti -..�a� - �Ei '.q��✓:i�11C.2" �i ��.7 K � �^ - �� + �.�. .y-v,. �- � �}♦}. •._�,!t' _ ��.�'G,' �(�„ �S_ �!',.� . � �.`y .{ *a�r� '�.�#1�' " , • 1�ti�'s' t d• 4�.��l... � a� •� 4�.i'�.�� I�• ! �iy�-: A'` t a : �y �.s, ♦ , 1 �, f�;��, a�. �� • •C !r a� e � n'� �,�,n �'�1'i'� -J0� ' � �t ,le . _ ..� � •`,� �- �. 7' ''r'..,N. -�. � t. g � ��i..�^ ..al�' �� : � ,�'!� i'� �: �, �_wJ^� ,C l�Pi.• . �� ;e � �.�•�� i• .c";� s �r � `Y�' ,� �T%'�� yY��_'��L,-��. i�� y ��y�`�� . -�3ir.`a1��,r '.}11�� ,- ' , , , . �: j . �.�y M a'� � /1�siYy,y 1=; ' r•� �t•'T • ' �'*� �T;�' ,\��S�f-�r� . � ' �.�� -�..I� ��7� :I f�� Ya l� T -L } S.`��M �YF��M�.. � 1 , A. "t � � '��•n �� M' f " • 7411 3�..� . 1 O . � � Legend � � ��,� n � ,� io�� ,,,;�,,,�au,,, �y.�m�,i � City and County Labels i F me r,hart3h li,nrd l�n 1. ,.,;., � ,_ i City and County Boundary � Rentun � O � I �all other values> 0 631 1,262Fee, Slreets 2023.sid . � i . � . R.1 Band_1 Notes � G�ee�r 6and_2 . B'��,. (�ai�J_3 Figure 1.Approximate Mobile Scanning Area 116t"Avenue Southeast Stormwater Improvements Page 7 of 18 Assumptions 1. Field surveying efforts are limited to one(1)day of data collection. Priority corridors will be surveyed before secondary corridors. It is possible that not all corridors will be surveyed during the one day of data collection. 2. The City will review draft deliverables and provide a single set of review comments and edits. Conflicting and ambiguous comments between City reviewers will be resolved prior to submitting to the Consultant. 3. Boundary line surveys will occur under Phase 2 once an alternative for design has been selected. 4. Health, safety, and security are the priority. The Consultant will not proceed if conditions are deemed unhealthy, unsafe, or not secure from harm of any type. Where unsafe conditions are found, the Consultant will notify the City to resolve them. 5. The Consultant is not responsible for any delays due to conditions outside of the Consultant's control. 6. Permits will not be required for the Consultant's efforts. The City will provide access to the survey area and will acquire all necessary right-of-entry access. 7. GIS from the City for utilities and/or other information will be provided to the Consultant or obtained by the Consultant from public sources. The Consultant will reasonably rely on data provided by the City and will have no obligation to investigate or independently verify the accuracy or completeness of such information 8. Underground Conductible Utility Locates and Surveying are not part of this scope except as noted. 9. Confined space entry will not be required. 10. Traffic control will not be required. 11. The Consultant will provide the City with three(3)days' advance notice for being on site to perform the survey. The Consultant will only proceed after receiving written (email) authorization from the City. 12. Survey basemap for 30% design will be approximate and will not utilize surveyed control. Title reports will not be reviewed at this stage. Right-of-way lines, property lines, encumbrances (such as easements)will not be resolved at this stage. 13. The survey basemap developed to support the 30%design task assumes that the basemap will be developed exclusively along 116�" Avenue Southeast between Southeast 168t" Street and Southeast Petrovisky Road. Basemap development on other roads or within private property are excluded from this scope of work unless the contract is amended accordingly. 14. A 3D laser scanner thaYs used in mobile mapping is a line-of-sight optical instrument. It is possible that some objects closer to the scanner will block it from scanning other objects further away, and therefore, these objects or areas may not be shown in the point cloud and may be omitted in our deliverables. Other sources of error can be caused due to site accessibility, onsite interferences and obscurities, or areas with high or low reflectivity or refractivity(e.g., glass, stainless steel, high gloss paints, wet or dark surfaces). Our experience in scanning will help us reduce the data lost for these reasons, but omissions are always a possibility, depending on the real conditions at the time the scans are collected. Examples of potential obstructions given the nature of this site may include, but are not limited to, parked and moving vehicles, bridge decks and rails, brush,trees, pedestrians, tall grasses, low hanging canopy, buildings, barriers, etc. 116t"Avenue Southeast Stormwater Improvements Page 8 of 18 15. 3D modeling is necessarily less accurate than the point cloud. Models do not connect every point collected by our scanners, and thus, true as-built information is omitted. Also, best-fit curves, truly vertical/horizontal line work, and modeling families may be used to reduce the scope and expense of the project, which will only approximate the location of certain features. For example, walls, ceilings, and floors could be modeled as one planar surface, losing natural bowing or differences in angles to other features. Similarly, deflections and bowing in piping runs may not be shown in the model. Although the typical accuracy of the model is within approximately one-half to one inch ('/z"-1"), these limitations could cause features to be modeled with much less accurately or omitted altogether in certain areas. 16. Every reasonable effort will be made by the Consultant to complete this survey in the time requested. However, if adverse conditions (such as major scope changes, delays in receiving title documents or right-of-way plans, or restricted access to adjacent parcels) are found to exist, then the time of delivery may be exceeded. 17. It is assumed that free and unencumbered access will be granted to the Consultant during the duration of this survey. 18. Health, Safety, and Security are priorities. The Consultant will not proceed if the conditions are deemed unhealthy, unsafe, or not secure from harm of any type. 19. Survey control will be prepared under the supervision and seal of a professional land surveyor licensed in the State of Washington. Deliverables 1. Access to online data viewing portal, where the City will be able to view the point cloud data and street view imagery. 2. Survey Basemap, as Autodesk Civil 3D DWG file,compatible with Civil 3D version 2018 and newer. The file will be georeferenced to the NAD83 (2011) horizontal datum. 3. 3D terrain model, as GIS raster file and as Autodesk Civil 3D DWG file. 4. List of six (6) control point coordinates in .CSV (PNEZD)format. 116t"Avenue Southeast Stormwater Improvements Page 9 of 18 TASK 1.4— HYDROLOGIC EVALUATION The Consultant will provide a hydrologic evaluation of existing conditions to support the development and evaluation of conceptual designs. The Consultant will provide the following services: 1. Delineate major tributary basins to key locations: a. Up to nine (9) stormwater outfalls to Big Soos Creek between SE 168t" Street and 116tn Ave SE. b. 116t"Ave SE at Big Soos Creek (North, South, and West) c. 117th Ave SE at Big Soos Creek (North, South, and West) d. 118th Ave SE at Big Soos Creek (North, South, and West) e. Outfall#OUT-0163, located on the south side of SE Petrovitsky Road at Big Soos Creek. 2. Assess existing conditions of the drainage basin to determine inputs for the hydrologic model. 3. Develop a continuous simulation hydrologic model using the Western Washington Hydrology Model (WWHM)for the drainage basin that will be used to compute Water Quality Design Flows, compute peak flows by return period, perform stream simulation analysis, and evaluate LID BMP performance. The model will represent the following: a. Existing hydrologic conditions, including attenuation of runoff due to engineered or naturally occurring ponds, lakes, or other detention facilities. b. Existing hydrologic conditions as A above and including conceptual design elements for project alternatives. c. Existing hydrologic conditions without engineered mitigation measures to ensure that runoff estimates are sufficiently conservative. d. Existing hydrologic conditions as C above and including conceptual design elements for project alternatives. 4. Review basins, drainage network, and maintenance practices to identify expected "hotspot" locations where sediment accumulation is expected to occur. 5. Develop a Stormwater Technical Memorandum documenting the methodology and findings of the above work items. Assumptions 1. WWHM is appropriate for the project study area. The WWHM has been vetted and is approved for use in City of Renton SurFace Water Design Manual. Tetra Tech will not be responsible for calibrating or validating the model. 2. Hydrologic model soil inputs will be determined via the NRCS Soil Survey. Hydrologic model slope inputs will be derived from LiDAR topographic data as defined in Task 1.3. 3. The analysis of stormwater treatment BMPs will follow the methodologies documented in the City's Surface Water Design Manual, in WA Ecology's Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington, and WA Ecology's General Use Level Designation for emerging technologies, as applicable. Deliverables 1. Draft and Final Stormwater Technical Memorandum, delivered electronically as a PDF. 116t"Avenue Southeast Stormwater Improvements Page 10 of 18 2. Modeling files upon request. TASK 1.5—ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS The Consultant will identify a range of potential options for conceptual design and participate in a workshop with the City to discuss design concepts that meet project goals. The Consultant will develop project alternatives and complete an evaluation of the alternatives. The Consultant will provide the following services: 1. Develop screening criteria to be used for development and evaluation of alternatives. Record information in the form of an evaluation matrix table. Screening criteria will be developed with input from the City and may include the following: a. Design complexity and constructability. b. Permit complexity. c. Implementation cost and schedule. d. Regulatory issues and constraints. e. Project risk and design resiliency and uncertainty. f. Maintenance and operations complexity and cost, including lifecycle cost. g. Property interests, public relations, and neighborhood impacts. h. Agency preferences. 2. Identify a range of potential design options and develop project concept design alternatives. Options may include a distributed network of small BMPs, one or more regional facilities, or a combination of the two. The options will also consider constraining BMPs to new BMPs within the City right-of-way along with acquiring existing, privately owned BMPs for public use. Lastly, the options will include the no-action alternative as a baseline for comparison. Up to four (4) distinct project alternatives, including the no-action alternative, will be developed. 3. Review likely permit pathways and durations for each alternative and document in a permitting matrix. 4. Prepare preliminary graphical representations of each alternative, including a site plan and location map. Graphical representations will be developed as hand sketches (either via pen/paper or via PDF annotations) or GIS shapefiles. 5. Prepare planning-level cost estimations for each alternative. Costs will be developed sufficiently such that the cost estimate reflects anticipated actual construction costs with a construction contingency to be determined by agreement between the Consultant and the City. 6. Lead one (1)two-hour(2 hour)virtual workshop with the City to review the alternatives, evaluation criteria, and alternative ranking. A preferred alternative will be selected during this workshop. 7. Develop an Alternatives Analysis Technical Memorandum, including graphics, summarizing the methods and outcomes of the alternatives development process, detailed descriptions of the alternatives, evaluation of design issues, intended function, and probable construction costs. The memorandum will also identify technical data gaps and additional technical studies and summarize outstanding data needs. Assumptions 1. The Consultant will facilitate the virtual workshop via Microsoft Teams. The Consultant will prepare the agenda for and take notes at the virtual workshop meeting and alternative development technical workshop. 116t"Avenue Southeast Stormwater Improvements Page 11 of 18 2. The City will review draft deliverables and provide a single set of review comments and edits. Conflicting and ambiguous comments between City reviewers will be resolved prior to submitting to the Consultant. 3. In providing opinions of cost, financial analyses, economic feasibility projections, for the project, Tetra Tech has no control over cost or price of labor and materials; unknown or latent conditions of existing equipment or structures that may affect operation or maintenance costs; competitive bidding procedures and market conditions; time or quality of performance by operating personnel or third parties; and other economic and operational factors that may materially affect the ultimate project cost or schedule.Therefore,Tetra Tech makes no warranty that ClienYs actual project costs, financial aspects, economic feasibility, will not vary from Tetra Tech's opinions, analyses, projections, or estimates. Deliverables 1. A draft exhibit of each concept alternative, delivered electronically as PDF documents. 2. Meeting notes for the virtual workshop, delivered electronically as an email. 3. Draft and Final Alternatives Technical Memorandum. TASK 1.6—THIRTY PERCENT (30%) DESIGN OF 116T" AVENUE SOUTHEAST STORMWATER IMPROVEMENTS The Consultant will prepare 30% design engineering plans and an estimate of probable cost for the 116t" Avenue Southeast Stormwater improvements using accepted engineering practices and City of Renton engineering guidance and standards. The drawing list is described in Table 1. Plan set scales will be selected based on using full size drawings for construction (22-inch by 34-inch paper). The Consultant will submit a 30%design package to the City for initial review and comment and will incorporate City comments into the 60% design package under a future contract amendment. Work elements for this task include: 1. Prepare 30% design plans representing the Type, Size, and Location (TS&L) of the preferred design alternative, stormwater conveyance profiles, and typical Water Quality BMP details. 2. Prepare a 30% estimate of construction cost. 3. Identify utility conflicts and potential utility conflicts. 4. Identify areas where temporary easements, permanent easements, or right-of-way acquisition will be necessary to accomplish the project. 5. Identify up to three (3) variances to City of Renton design standards necessary to accomplish the project. 116t"Avenue Southeast Stormwater Improvements Page 12 of 18 Table 1. Preliminary Drawing Sheet List NO. OF SHEETS ANTIC.. . .TED SHEET NAME SCALE FUTURE DESIGNA 30% DESIGN (NOT INCLUDED IN THIS CONTRACT) Cover Sheet and Sheet Index 1 1 Legend and Abbreviations 1 1 General Notes 1 1 Existing Conditions (Basemap) 1" = 100' 1 1 Construction Access Plan 1" = 100' - 1 Site Preparation and TESC Plan 1" = 20' - 3 Site Preparation and TESC Details - 1 Stormwater Drainage Plan and Profile 1" = 20' 6 Stormwater Quality BMP—Typical Details 1 � Stormwater Quality BMP—Grading Details - Standard Details - � Traffic Control Plan and Details 1" = 1000' - " Total 11 A60%, 90%, 100%, and Final Design efforts will occur under a future amendment to this contract. BActual quantity of BMPs is unknown. Number of sheets is assumed. Assumptions 1. The 30% design task assumes that the preferred alternative identified in Task 1.7 will be a network of distributed stormwater BMPs exclusively along 116t" Avenue Southeast between Southeast 168t" Street and Southeast Petrovisky Road. Distributed stormwater treatment facilities on other roads or within private property, and regional facilities, are excluded from this scope of work unless the contract is amended accordingly. 2. All stormwater BMPs will are assumed to meet the following criteria: o Filter cartridge technology certified for General Use Level Designation (GULD) for Basic treatment by the Washington State Department of Ecology. o Separate infiltration and/or facilities will not be used. o All stormwater BMPs will be "off-the-shelf' designs; no custom configurations or special detailing will be necessary. 116t"Avenue Southeast Stormwater Improvements Page 13 of 18 3. Construction specifications according to WSDOT Standard Specifications for Road, Bridge, and Municipal Construction, 2026 Edition, or most current edition. 4. Standard drainage details according to, in order of priority, (1) City of Renton Standard Details and (2)WSDOT Standard Plans. 5. Stormwater infrastructure designed according to, in order of priority, (1) the City of Renton 2022 Surface Water Design Manual (SWDM) and (2) the Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) 2024 Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington (SWMMWW). 6. Design submittals will be prepared using Autodesk Civil 3D 2025 or other version compatible with the 2018 (current) DWG filetype. 7. The City will provide the Consultant with documentation of City CAD standards, Civil 3D template files, title blocks, logos, and other CAD documents conforming to City standards. 8. Project data will be expressed relative to the Washington State Plane (North Zone) NAD83 horizontal coordinate system and the NAVD88 vertical datum. 9. The City will review draft deliverables and provide a single set of review comments and edits. Conflicting and ambiguous comments between City reviewers will be resolved prior to submitting to the Consultant. 10. In providing opinions of cost, financial analyses, economic feasibility projections, for the project, Tetra Tech has no control over cost or price of labor and materials; unknown or latent conditions of existing equipment or structures that may affect operation or maintenance costs; competitive bidding procedures and market conditions; time or quality of performance by operating personnel or third parties; and other economic and operational factors that may materially affect the ultimate project cost or schedule.Therefore,Tetra Tech makes no warranty that ClienYs actual project costs, financial aspects, economic feasibility, will not vary from Tetra Tech's opinions, analyses, projections, or estimates. Deliverables 1. 30% Plans, delivered electronically as a PDF. 2. 30% Cost Estimate, delivered electronically as a PDF. 3. List of utility conflicts, including corresponding plan set sheet number, delivered electronically as a MS Word document. 4. Location and size (in square feet) of each easement or right-of-way acquisition, delivered electronically as a MS Excel document. 5. List of variances to City of Renton design standards, delivered electronically as a MS Word document. TASK 1.7 — PERMIT PATHWAY REVIEW Following the completion of Task 1.7 and the selection of a preferred alternative, the Consultant will review necessary and/or anticipated permit requirements for the project design and will incorporate the permit requirements into the project design constraints. The preparation of permit application materials will occur under a future amendment to this contract. The Consultant will provide the following services: 1. Coordinate with the City to identify local permits that are applicable to this project. 2. Conduct one (1) pre-application or informational meeting with City permitting department to review the project, confirm permitting approach and design requirements, and identify additional permits and beneficial permitting strategies. 116t"Avenue Southeast Stormwater Improvements Page 14 of 18 3. Update the permit matrix developed in Task 1.7 and the project schedule to reflect the detailed permit evaluation. Assumptions 1. Federal, State, and County permits will not apply to this project. 2. Permit applications will occur under a future contract amendment. 3. The pre-application meeting will be attended by up to two (2)Tetra Tech staff, including the project manager. The meeting will last up to one (1) hour. Tetra Tech will facilitate the meeting, prepare the meeting agenda, and prepare meeting notes. Deliverables 1. Pre-application meeting agenda and notes. 2. Updated permit matrix. 3. Updated project schedule. TASK 1.8 —ADDITIONAL, UNANTICIPATED, URGENT, OR SPECIAL SERVICES This task includes unanticipated services that are time sensitive and crucial to maintaining the project schedule and progress work. Work performed under this task will not exceed 50 hours and will require specific, prior written authorization from the City. Written authorization may be granted only after the Consultant submits both a written scope and costs for the additional work,which is reviewed and specifically negotiated by the City. Assumptions 1. The Consultant may plan for the following to address this Task — Up to 50 hours of Project Management, Engineering, Project Control, or Administrative services. Deliverables 1. Reports, estimates, drawings, special inspections, field services, public outreach, and documentation as appropriate. 116t"Avenue Southeast Stormwater Improvements Page 15 of 18 ATTACHMENT A. Tetra Tech Assumptions for BMP's Stormwater Assumptions—O&M 1. Proper maintenance is necessary for Stormwater Best Management Practices (BMPs) to be effective at removing pollutants and reducing runoff volumes as well as peak flow rates for the long term. Specific maintenance tasks and frequencies may vary based on land use and changes in activities in the watershed, including increased sediment and trash loads. Increased sediment and trash loads beyond those predicted through accepted modeling practices will impact overall performance and may require adjustments to the project after completion of construction. Tetra Tech will develop an Operations and Maintenance (O&M) manual, as part of the final design in Phase 2, specifically concerning the elements of the BMP(s). Recommendations for maintenance tasks and frequencies will be based on current maintenance practices derived from similar BMPs, manufacturer guidelines for proprietary BMPs, lessons learned during project initiation, and current maintenance protocols. Tetra Tech is not responsible for variations in the maintenance tasks and frequencies required for proprietary BMPs or caused by changes in the watershed characteristics and conditions, including sediment and trash loading. Stormwater Assumptions—Adaptive Manaqement 1. Changes in the watershed, including an increase or decrease in flow or changes in pollutant loads, can impact the performance of the BMP and the ability to meet regulatory requirements.Tetra Tech is aware that performance of similar BMP systems has varied based on changes in the watershed including turbidity, volumes, filter water elevation, sediment capture, and storm size. Tetra Tech expects the performance of this system to vary, and an adaptive management maintenance program will be required. System bypasses will be designed to prevent flow diversions into the system under specific conditions when performance of the BMP is impacted. During times of diversion, pollutant loading will not be reduced in the main channel and the ability to meet regulatory targets will be impaired. Tetra Tech will engage with the City to refine the future O&M manual update process and discuss preliminary maintenance recommendations, recognizing that maintenance needs may vary significantly based on storm events (intensity and quantity), watershed characteristics, and system performance. The O&M manual will be reviewed and updated every 1-2 years, or as necessitated by operations and maintenance staff, consultants, or by Tetra Tech under a subsequent task order. Stormwater Assumptions—Veqetation for Stabilization 1. Vegetation in a BMP, particularly wetland species, can be sensitive to changes in hydrologic regime such that one or two inches of deviation in ponding depth can influence whether a species survives or dies. A diverse variety of vegetation, suited to the conditions in the BMP, is recommended to maximize vegetation survival and establishment. Mature vegetation may vary from the initial planting plan based in the conditions in the BMP. The densities recommended in the planting plan are critical for BMP function; however, the species of vegetation may vary. Standard of Care 1. Work will be completed in conformance with the services provided by an experienced and competent professional engineering organization rendering similar services under similar circumstances and in a similar vicinity 116t"Avenue Southeast Stormwater Improvements Page 16 of 18 ATTACHMENT B. Tetra Tech Assumptions for Design Phases Civil Engineering Design is often presented in 30%, 60%, 90%, and 100% milestones, which are intended to represent the approximate level of completion of the project design. However, these phases are usually poorly defined and assumptions regarding what work is complete at which phase are fertile ground for miscommunication, scope creep, scheduling issues, and inadequate or excessive budgeting. This attachment aims to supplement the scope of work and to define, for each phase of design, what work elements should be considered complete at each phase,where future revision would be considered a scope change, and what work elements are subject to change under the succeeding design phase. THIRTY PERCENT (30%) DESIGN 30°/o Design aims to complete field work and base mapping, and to define major project elements, types, sizes, and locations. Project impacts, easement needs, utility conflicts, and other design considerations are identified in this stage. However, the specific details of the project elements and conflict resolutions are not defined at this stage. After the completion of 30% Design, the following elements will be considered "fixed" as future design progression will depend on these elements: Basis of Design • All existing conditions data collection efforts (topographic, planimetric, and boundary line) are complete and basemap. • All other field work (including geotechnical investigations) are complete unless specifically scoped as an ongoing task. • Design criteria and technical reference documents. • List of analytic methods, models, and other necessary software. Engineering Analysis • Hydrologic model inputs are complete and preliminary modeling is complete. Any subsequent modeling will be done only to confirm the performance of specific designs. • Stormwater BMP Type, Size, and Location (TS&L) analyses are complete, including the use of proprietary, GULD-certified BMPs. • Stormwater conveyance calculations. • Utility conflicts, relocation needs, and responsible parties have been identified, but not resolved. Engineering Drawings • Client CAD standards (including title block, borders, logos, contact information, linetypes and symbology, printed appearance, etc.) have been incorporated and confirmed as correct by Client. • For sheets developed at 30% design: sheet layouts and viewport extents and confirmed. • The existing conditions basemap is complete, including the following: o Topographic data, survey datums, and survey control o Boundary line information as applicable, including Right-of-Way lines, property lines, and existing easement lines. o Planimetric data including existing buildings, roadway geometry (curbs, flow lines, crown, etc.) and paint striping, utility poles and pedestals, landscaping features, etc. o Horizontal position (overhead and underground) and vertical position (underground only) of existing utilities. 116t"Avenue Southeast Stormwater Improvements Page 17 of 18 o Critical and/or hazardous area boundaries and buffers relevant such as wetlands, ordinary high-water lines, aquifer recharge zones, steep slopes, etc. o Location of field explorations (if surveyed) such as geotechnical test pipes, boring locations, or monitoring wells. • Major design features are complete, including the following: o Preliminary site grading o The location and orientation of stormwater BMPs and drainage conveyance infrastructure. o The extents of pavement and sidewalk restoration, repair, or replacement. o Necessary standard and special details are identified. o Utility conflicts are shown horizontally. Vertical conflicts are shown if sufficient information is available. Construction Cost Estimate • The bid items in the cost estimate are fixed, but additional bid items are expected to be added in later design phases. Technical Specifications • Technical specifications are not developed at 30% design. Right-of-Way/Easements • The need, location, and orientation of Right-of-Way, permanent easements, and/or or temporary easements necessary for the project are identified. Permitting • The permit pathway is defined, including necessary permits, permitting agencies, and anticipated permit review times. • Permit requirements are incorporated into the project design constraints. • Pre-application or other informational meetings with permitting agencies are conducted to confirm the permit approach. Adjustments to the permit approach are made if necessary. 116t"Avenue Southeast Stormwater Improvements Page 18 of 18 OEx B hbtp-ioimeConnisat nalPr oLba sea I PcoarTr ty/ium5m crueRose ogSohsBi reteCvA6 e 1ES1 atkeSedm nit iBbtlRae z�5.00 �go.00 z5o.00 z�5.00 zo5.00 �80.00 �45.00 �3o.00 �5o.o0 ��5.00 �z5.00 �45.00 �45.00 �05.00 �8�.50 �3�.50 �5.o0 OrOnClt CE RTTAHET Mvaen Mpaping Soilounts >jAarOfPE mtMg mtMg mtMg gEn gEn gEn gEn gEn veryu5 veryuS DCA midAn midAn midAn veryuS veryu5 veryu5 san I oiagTsTt�ckri �8197 Stubimted t tiCy:o f oRentn orP ocsWkuibl 0 0 v v � � � N � v a v v _ ,� � b Q E � v �y `w « -`o - v -�o � ntoCratc Type MT&: = " � ,,, - � � - � E ` 3 � � a5T '� v 3 w x � a � � v � E la otT ° � ' w - � - - - " " € o -� � o � � � n igPcr baLor rHs - _ � ° - a � T a ° a o � v o > SaloTt ksP sera PheT/otjsasc $��2 � 35 611 03 47V �26 891 344 204 V 84 04 072 22 3 71 8 � $8$ $ 2$4,946 12,9$$ ,�47 390 298 ��1 r1 1P-.nktsoejcmngaMaaeeTt 14 92 169 - 1 - -27 - - - - 20 -15 $ 29,075 5 S - S - - S 29,07 5 joePltcPranning 3 13 24 - 4 4 - - $ 4,325 $ $ 4,325 TedaimrnCoao tian eoMned tings 10 45 80 - 1 - -23 - - - - 1 - - $ 14,605 $ - $ $ - 4,605 hceSdulaeM nagement 1 19 20 - � - - - - � - - - - - - - $ 3,69 5 $ - $ - 3,695 tsRer posegsoiaor ecPnnrvds I -15 45 - - - - - - - - - 15 -15 $ 6,450 $ - $ - 6,450 wonnev caid eeRit ICao2 I1D-.tkasaT 4 1812 - 3 8 46 66 52 - - - - - - $ 28,535 $ $ $ -5,688 31$ 34,5 36 TE-1ai2i k1t.ixRe.sfs veonwg Pub IilcayviA lable aDta 4 1192 - 2 3 16 40 52 - - - - - - $ 18,065 $ - $ $ - 8,065 T-2ai2k1.S.st eRenno caaisneaca sSndm pling - -62 - 1 5 30 26 - - - - - - - $ 10,470 $ $ $ -5,688 $313 1 6,471 $ 3 1S o-.nk scu0iaryetnT)Iv IyCao e(IDta - 1483 28 2 - - - -48 40 - - 3 - $ $ 8 8 23,790 $47 $ $ ,300 77 3 ,514 aDtqacuiAi stino - 1 1416 - - - - - - - - - 1 - $3,825 $ $ $ -7,300 42 1,167 isnegcosaPrtDt asPo - 1 11 - 1 - - - - 8 - - - 1 - $1,800 $ - $$ - 1, 0 aDtaaEtt CcQrixA/Qn o - 1 1497 1 - - - -40 40 1 - $ 14,700 $ $ 4,700 elyovCnto rurS 24 8 8$ $ 3,200 320 $ $35 3,555 CnteoiyvrngoureSnyc - $ S 265 27 $ 292 4 o1H-.nyksidarutcTovagloi IaE 7 3433 - 13 -60 82 15 8 - -20 - - - $ 51,770 $ $ $ - $ - - 51,77 IyogHodderoiMl cing 3 2143 - 4 -40 46 118 - - - - - - $ 31,675 $ - $ 1,675 deltnptotiiosHafctino - -61 - 1 - 812 20 - -20 - - - $ 8,555 5 - 5 8,555 mwatrToSteehrcniacaleMmnrdoum 4 -68 - 8 -12 24 20 - - - - - - $ 11,540 $ - $ 1,540 SvysAirseinleant5 talA-.kslaT 16 4657 - 20 38 72152 92 - -68 - - - $ $ 74,430 - $ $ $ - - 74,4 IeAnelatvepDmort ieesntv 11 3254 - 8 38 48 80 68 - -68 - - - $ 51,315 S- $ 1,315 eMeph oktisrnogW 2 3 9- - - - 4 - - - - - - - $ 1,6 $ 70 - $ 1,670 IAnatneaArt ielsTvyi seshcniacaleMmn rdoum 3 131- - 12 24 68 24 $ 21,425 $ $ 1,425 gn6 i 13s D-.Oo f%kesah 11Tr 6Atev I SSotreaEtwmpmr. 10 431a - 31 -12 1os 92 - 174- - - - 5 63,525 5- S 5 $ - 63,5 30PI%ans 8 3874 - 27 - -96 80 - 172 - - - - $ 56,165 $ - $ 6,165 30Et%i smate 22 - 2 - 4 8 8 - - - $3,470 $ $ 3,470 tiUlitlyCnfoi naAtc lyiss � - -11 - 1 - 2 4 � 4 - - - - - - $1,735 $ - $ 1,735 EaenamAs ROeI Wn&t yiss 1 - 7- - - 4 - - - - 2 - - - 5 1,2 45 $ - $ 1,245 ViaarnaneAc lyiss 1 - 4- 1 - 2 - - - - - - - - $ 91 0$ - $ 910 wevyah eRiwta Prte7 1Pi m-.ksaT - 3 15 - -12 - - - - - - - - - $ 3,0 $ $ 00 - $ - -$ 3,000 Permit Matrix Update - 1 11 - -10 - - - - - - - - - $ 2,23 0 $ - $ 2,230 Pre-ApplicationMeetings - 2 4- - 2 - - - - - - - - - $ 7 70$ - $ 770 d,Uercpt,Ua,00niirgnnlnt8 eaalAt i-.SksdtapdiT Srlecvcaseiei 2 2 50 2 4 4 8 8 8 - - 8 2 - 2 $ 8,470 $ $ - $ - - $ 8,4 70 ddAitinaonalUnt,ipeiScicig paaeevcrrsnoeltt,erSUd, 2 2 50 2 4 4 8 8 8 - - 8 2 - 2 8,470 $ - $ 8,470 - $ - $ - $ - on)(i4%tacsl 1 aEehsPa - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - $ $ $ 2,371 - $ - - 2,371 ppAlPhaiVe 1 a 2lsfeimOSt od nol% tonhf so3ue( 2026) - $ 2,371 2 71 tolaTs 8,02 35 611 oa a� 26 891 aaa zoa sa oa o�z zz a �i a � $a$ $ 2849,46 129,88 34� 390 298 ,71 terg adrutvNaBie .1 tnorctCa t otdlmm�eatu xces tloeeeahgtsh dtuorlbafere dvice(onbea)reneto.fdari s osi nAcorsevs cer pv niodEeidit i,ebfpAo coi xhSW rs geaett sao mnecoetprhok,ttiy ehC rtas e rt epvn nocodrtectid argonit r ccoioadyrt ueolhhttcti)eebegr hB.djpiuo(xhb EOtreh rcu s nr nsedtn ei rieeeuxp hcoesefloba rnersopfaer ognmti egae gnlmiidu clemr nlburdbsei ilenas r shteeeiuhhedita t enc�urtne r mindlSregenpnt alRa.iaiedshg doLt od et xce eehAGrre thSear seevfrs o cern atowicat oiehl erpv.ode dOtirtius r deechns h sueaxpe emlbr,birs egleaentnach,gostnshrehop gip pdaientaler udtsea sts ct%Icouase0am.r n1 urumtelbise nxppee stEeruqerok p wvs nes.fdceo yii nipiacooAps mdystebu i mneccoabaprefrom rdore pit ot efhefctvei tgefan aderiou tnncoitre tna totd eefemoihcol pt eh Ili,gtnr iiw nnw oridsepgetuaenicorctass,etroe Ihwnu etba t tenhco.rsectnas reoxp'e .2 rtacts ee r ast jlcoebat suu fvncroseon naag ieniliyruolHvell P-etmluaCW -cop-e edeatpans seaToBSalbtt iyihC wrvo.la Tetra Tech-Confidential and Proprietary Page 1 of 1 Printed 1/5/2026 CITY OF RENTON PUBLIC WORKS RATE TABLE BIG SOOS CREEK AT 116TH AVE SE SEDIMENT CONTROL Principal Engineer/Scientist $ 275.00 Tetra Tech Senior Project Manager $ 225.00 Tetra Tech Staff Project Manager $ 180.00 Tetra Tech Survey Manager $ 250.00 Tetra Tech QA/QC Engineer � $ 275.00 Tetra Tech Senior Engineer $ 225.00 Tetra Tech Senior Scientist � $ 205.00 Tetra Tech Project Engineer $ 180.00 Tetra Tech Staff Engineer $ 145.00 Tetra Tech Junior Engineer $ 130.00 Tetra Tech Project Scientist $ 150.00 Tetra Tech Staff Scientist $ 130.00 Tetra Tech Junior Scientist $ 115.00 Tetra Tech Lidar Scientist $ 150.00 Tetra Tech Lidar Analyst $ 115.00 Tetra Tech Survey Admin $ 145.00 Tetra Tech CAD/GIS Specialist, Senior $ 180.00 Tetra Tech CAD/GIS Specialist, Project $ 145.00 Tetra Tech CAD/GIS Specialist, Staff $ 125.00 Tetra Tech Contract Administrator $ 145.00 Tetra Tech Admin/Clerical $ 105.00 Tetra Tech ■ Principal $ 250.00 Maven Mapping Solutions PLS - $ 187.50 Maven Mapping Solutions ■ Project Manager $ 187.50 Maven Mapping Solutions Quality Manager $ 187.50 Maven Mapping Solutions Project Surveyor $ 162.50 Maven Mapping Solutions Senior Office Tech $ 137.50 Maven Mapping Solutions Office Tech $ 112.50 Maven Mapping Solutions Party Chief $ 137.50 Maven Mapping Solutions Drone Pilot $ 165.00 Maven Mapping Solutions Additional Crew Member $ 75.00 Maven Mapping Solutions Admin $ 137.50 Maven Mapping Solutions Big Soos Creek at 116th Ave SE Sediment Control 1 �� - `,j- '- �'i � '/' •�� : • ►�i„ T^ '� r� ��`, A��.�� , ._�I! I � 1'A•r� �� ' �� •t.t7 '� �� n� ~�� . �` - � •* .. . _:c�._ . . _ ��.1_�y��. �_ . � r�`�� . �` . �`��: . , •f' � r-. '-I � . � � " ' �.� r, .�y�.. �� h• � � � �; - �'��. �� r„ .� ��.R.".'�+.r`C.'r'�. !��i � ..} fi'� ��'�+,�.�1�r ��`'�" . �� w'�• � ,.uj. *! _ t� � . . .�.,� . • - �, •�. �,•'� i.• �: . ` r . � � ._:� .� 4 �� _ ♦. . .+ � • i► A p �+ � T� �. � ��'7. l`�',r-- �}_,l � '�' �M , .,.�. ♦ .� ' �«�' ':^ � '� 'r� -.�-� �r-.��j' . f� t �� `� • �� '� • �� e 4 � -'� r�- �� , 4 �I71' .�,' �- ,� 1-s� �� !. • O1„�` �n � �, .. - �. , '�;r"�.' .ti .�' y'�,'�- r:.�.: s~ �1 9 '�!"t �r•- .� , -- - � 1 � ~ y� -. . � � ' . �!^'�' -/ , . r�r • rr, '�. '`1 �- ' 1 �rr� ��_ 1' �., �I Q1�•� , �� ( �� :�'� -f� vr K l�1�, � ��4,�� f�„�/ �� ^' -� �,0.� 1�, rt �� `yh/�.+�,i\ � ��`� .,�.. ,�� a 1 r � � }"y .,�� ! /�' -��y r ""W"r� �`r��yti. •_.�f ti��r'=�'w� `, y ��• � �1'�'":f� , h` ,;• 'tC,4',e� ., �}}�' �(�-{-* y��+�r• �. � "' ,,+f � 1 �� ' . _.r - � ' ;�'� :�� . ' ,-SS - _'ll P � 1► , � `� ' , � •/ � � \ �l• '� � .� �,�t� ,� — ��*, ` ,1��, � 'L�,, j�'-;� 4;;c.�r ,�=y .��/� ��/� . �.*,,A�`• �.��i ' ,,� tiy-c� .. � r -":' ! r- .► � Y�+ !" �`� . . �,. .�. � ' _ '��V �,M•:�� r' •A .' r�� '� .1� .r', � " /,. • . ��, �,' ..��,�- � , �• , . - �- � Y . '�� t{,. W '�,f �`' .{,'", , . �� 'r�� `�'� ._ � ,r' �i '� '�: d �=- ' �'fi�'�1.�'� .�f� ��►�� . �,, ^..� �rfi � r, 1S .' ��. , ' "' _ �<,�.£��R'�• �.�._.I� : 1�'(`• '' ~�r� • "r' ,�1M� - � �-�[�� .� �-'�r� f: �.9 ' � �' ' l'��,;,., a. � ,�. ..� �,� � �- � � , •r�'.�.�, � ► � . -,,r ..�.��: .. - y, � .�, , � ;. « � �i ,' . _:, , `/ . ' � �.,." , u�; 1, � ,- _ � -+ — � • � ' . , f � r , , � �.. 7. •�='r �I y�7 � � - • � �•y.i�l�� , • �� . ,1 . . � � ^ .;� r {, �� , � ��J��w� �. � �- •a� �� r' � � .�� • ,�� 3R�� •� 'i" . l.c��a' - .� � ��' � _ . ,-•y �' '' 'f �i 1 �r'1�"'rI� �II' '1 � 'T 1�- t * . ��;��}. �. � ..� �#n � � � �:_ ` _ . � ,�. � ; , ,�y �w _ ,� � •_�'�� ,� . �'� • •' 1;c.. - - �jr ��fi' �J� � f ��cJ �, W�' �7 i 't,�� .;.►,,,t�'�'�°�1'.�;i:y ' - � ` ''"':�.�1�►�'ti'�,�� _� ,-' '�.^* , ��,. ��- � �!"�t. , �.• y�. 't .� !�_'. ` r � �r;�'� i � y_` ��` V',a �� ; � �y�� • .� A �, ';'�f� �- - .. f �' � I r*�+ � �� 1,- �• � '�� C , '� • . � . . 1�•, ''�`� _ ;i.t� I��*/.,: ?`th,* e •�� _''_' K,��I - �� ..` )' +q � � �f""r�. 1. ��,�•'' �� ,`�C• _ _� �I I 1�y ]� �' 1I ` � .l . ., •• i -,��--�-� � . O - -�If7I � f:�� i.: �,i� "'�_.- ' -- - _ - - ~ '',T, ._.�^A'�rll_-. _ �7 �A� I �, � �} �' ��'� �"' -, - •+� r �� •� �6 .� , � 1' ^'„"''"` r...� .� ��t. _ �.. ��• �� -_C � '� '�- , ; 'I. ' �.• '�.�1 �� .' .�� J �� / ��. �' �i�. �' � F � �' ,;s,� � ,u �r�' �. S�♦� - •� r , � l�i`�:� '-' , �-' �� i -, � ~;�` T"i� ��-�_ �1 ' � n� r-,, �� M. �" .._ +5t� ' • . - � -p�� . �y�.�.,�,�� .1��..: 1'�� A� � �'� �` � .r� . , � � ' , _ �.r' ��`�_�r, - ' �;�. � _�'�h y� -. � �';� '� i� . ' 1. � ` -��1 - _�� . `1 ' �.�°,�,w' �-t-:�� A�� "'� � �t� f ^•.►� , � :� � ' �M�r� lS4� "+S' � ,�� cr �r� � ' � � * . .�� - _�TM'y '- �-y7 f�,�/4., --� , , �r, 'yn.►''�r . �` - - . - L'� :_w�f�IT,�C�� 1' /`� � S 4 7 1 I r{T__I[ r�� .,�� - ti �_ ,�,�� ' . ,_ . ' .� ,'1�[ N I. _ _ -� �e�l r..� ��..,� �: ^ �. "�R�� ;• ,,� ;'� .�� f �' �I• � ' '�. ,a' � '•��►r'• .��.•a� . __� n��;w '��( , � �� t � � 9-A r:'�.,{. _.� ' � �� - -r � . � _ .: '�^' .��_ ^ .�:� '•.�/� � :j':�:�_ r��:-,�,7!,T � L R ��y'� �:�' '��'� 1'1'�'!�:4r..+� �•,'�,' � ' ��...� �� . ,��. ., -� -,A. �i :��)l�—;i;r� -'�"�-r.�` .'��'.a.,;.��:T=;�-,� �.i �. "i �%�i� �`� . ;j ' .� '�,k � , _� �� -. I'• . ,.:, �-'�. _f - ' , ;� ��' �.., ,,, �+.f",.►� t ,w,(�' ��,, _�w .� .N�� { + . � .-r S''�, � ��;3-� `,y�. r- �� I � „ �!� ,� ,�,_. '�s t-r �s �`r.�.., �►{ w,�:�.,�� _ ,-1 I ,� �r��1�'�r~�-S i., � r r ��~r� tt* •��`'. `�-`l '�`�j�.,v� �� . . ,� . � � � ;.� /•"� � � �„ .� �-'�'' !-_ �"+'��y"'. „�/, "`, ' `_�.M'� _'p �' �^♦• ^� '�' • •"� �, , ,� _ y . � c ,�,,,,_ , -- ,. �' • _ : �Y'� ,aI • Legend �� is"without warranty or any representation ot � accuracy,timeliness of completeness.The Cit and Count LabelS — S-Shore�ine burden for determining accuracy,completeness, Y y timeliness.merchantability and fitness for or the F-Fish appropriateness for use rests solely on the user. Clty 811d COUllty BOUlldal'Y � � Renton — Np-Non-Fish L--� � '--' �all other values> Ns-Non-Fish Seasonal 0 256 512 Feet Environment Designations Unclassfied I Natural � Wetlands WGS 1934 Web Mercator Auxiliary_Sphere J - - - - ] Shoreline High Intensity Pump Station Notes � Shoreline Isolated High Intensity pg Public Pump Station ViCinity Map � Shoreline Residential � Private Pump Station � Urban Conservancy Discharge Point � Jurisdictions � Public Discharge Point �.----- ,,.,---�--,. �. o.,.,...,.�...,.�...,.,.o,..... . � I • � � � • � � � � � o : _ • • — . • � �;;� �'�Y'`Y� `�� . , , � � - - • - • • ��°'' '" '':� �.��/'�'��,� r��1 g ♦. ��..�z�^'1JT�•1��wY p�'. - e �r,�'i �+,F� .�� 4��t`�„{�1 . 7y� .:� �M 5 '�{(' '` i�N'��n Cr � 'w'�f �A�:.s',�.. . �art�i`1��,�`,p� K � � ��iy�r . ��. ` �' µ�,�.;. �T��' yq L' f,'/ '� y� . . V." ' L P A v ��'� ' � ,�;l•f✓' � `�ii3�.�tF�` I�t�,''�,�� `�n��f�,�. . �m y �-' ��.'q _.. � , �� rr�`� M, � i'� �a`+� ^ T �9!�G? � � � �bk, � �� r n � �� ,� ,�t ��Yti.! � I " � �,. ��r� ��s��'�,%. s.�c,. �, - , /� � I, � L'yr'�' �,"'�y';� ��y':.� ��• !I �f{ir� 4 �`�' �ih.� y.,. q +1.. + ,� .y-i `I 1 .T ^� ) �� . '.�� ^'/1 ■ (Yw . 4/ T r�/4 {�.1�!� + T r�� +.r ��' , � F �• ` ` . 1• � ---- - • "�^i��'�� +" �'t' � i w ' > - *Nw w� x� I j ' A �.� � �r y� - �'•.L 4 �` — —�� I � I i � {,�� f i'� � �A x � 'b � � � '`�,�"'.�.— . w r�� " . �µ�-�`.��'��s . � j� �' ' _ � � „'�`r," J,y � . — � � � F7!_ ' 6 ��' `..'s�{ Yµa1y � `'� •�, � '�� _ �'� �'� �'��+ ';� Y,.__ _� . 5 �!�* i � � 4 i�� ,�� t \. � �y, J�r;' 'C � ,,� .#y�`�. �F '.yr±7� ..'� , �Oh�'} f' '�:�k, r. 1� �r � `'�� , �}, � ��y��i g � � ♦��+'a,�, � / • � � ��` �� y_9 ,ir, �+'`Sr.. ��A'��:}��4 •i.')'1+_ �.�ry1��5'�;�t � ' ✓� . . . �l�� f�. .,.��F,• �� -G � � f R� �� I�Y� Zw�R 4rCy^� '."�C�i �,�5� )i � F � � _; � �.�`5�.�, , � ±. ,.:� �,_ s� . ,�_+: �' � � �!��}: � �: � {�' �E� � `•y, '� �( a .�Y ��i. � �' '�"t �`— • ,� '+��r�� [ �� .r�k '; 5��1"' ��p`'3' �4 �� ."w"'�� 1. ,�V� � �,,y�r y��y� ....��' ��.' + Q.- +'t 4�f��'L$ �`i�.f '.,�'. � R h'(r� ! j, � •�^'P. � � � �� .� �" �.�a� '� � � �' 1�:^•'�•yGy'�d"r � ,. ,� h<r,". r , '��'+ �iL � �� .J T ��r �i �'A, i�.:?+' �z�2 .,'6 t ,..�.� . +.E+,d`` Sr • '� }L:i .+' } Y�' � �y .,�-. . .� � . 14�:� t�� w� .�k , � "�q�4�> �� J '� �,.x..�� 1 �i�y�`��' � `�4�g�Yr��\� � �a � x CS, ..� .�,�.. � .,?�a��.}.}, +:4!' �,��"�� _ — �� .�- g ' f � � . � �y ��`� �� ;�' �!1"� rw . 7`�� '� k'�', ^ � �.. _ .. .u43 �,�.�Iv' � ��:'.eV�'� �r� . ,�M'�'+'��"��.—. . ... ...�r .. , ��5. . .. .-.�' Bi Soos Creek at 116t" Ave SE Sed iment Control g Project Background Locatio n• �f� �� _ ' i � !�-°-r q� ,�'ti��f�ak'�`� „ '�� .� � _ r � `fi,` y .�� . y ��,��'`� r� j �e�� i�r ��`7H k� :�`�'�'r� � /' �' �. aa. Z'° ,ro �1 � ,. + +5 �+�'� �, [^` +� �A� c e"� �v�� . ,�. . �,= . • 116t" Ave SE between SE 168t" St � ��t� °� ��"6 Y�� '� . �, .� � a -j k, � .� ,nt d 2 i t � ,]!�-� ✓ �r,�J ♦ '��e .� Y � � 6.. ' �� ! 4�Y y ��r+ �,:. >�,§� 3 a.�b � ef�� M' r�( i' r � and Petrovitsky Road ��►��'�- ' fi� � ��.�a � �� . � J :�{ g� � �� .` 3 � � va s � =er;�°� ,y �i�'1 a' � � � ' �., ` � � 'w '�i �'. � , . � 1� f,.� # k. Y. G� .� �,�,� y � �i �� f�� f �'�g,'g + �'r� �1*�� _ R°�� * ��, �i ` ,�"`�_,F�. �'�.BC� � ,g.4 1�j►.rfF'. ��:r�, -- #��;y,y,, �$ �-:r-t-'�j�h,�,'�`;'s,'��.�vt�_: � - � V'�' R �d}i �r�� .""a �`� r v� �I� �r� � `� �P�. � . T �Zc�.-,�+qef.:aF.y o`#f� � � .. .1G . � - .:.tr }.'�'w ,t�;r :;.� i��Q7 ��;� '�-ry '+'��,�4# � � � 'S�`��,c"� ��"�� v Qiy w� ''�•. �* -= C�� k s'l�y��`` '�s�'�► � ��,a$��Y�� '< �: ' �... �+� '� � J.kr*.E� r+�s�e� �,�m� ,� _a. a ..�� i�i:�.. � �i f�;�$i� r x'' .:�" -. ��)IS^�s� �pp� � . .��.i !"` "'. �,..�.�'� <;: `y ` �''" .' �`��✓'�r !; ��"1/Y f.^1 . — � .,: �r y a�°�' �� $� • . � ' °-i� � �"�'j7r �, � � -' ,-_�� . � >.�' li r �_ .^.� �_�..5 ss�.y.� � 1; ��t t,� -- -•� �,,�_ =-,, l� , 'E r �.�� '�� '� �� ' l J�. - i is �. v.�. `ca - � � �� ,�� , I � ,t Y�`2� � r�"�.:,�.syS< r"'� �lf`�'��',�1 ti;n � �y� . ti '�^Z�.�. �"'.N� i e .,+� � +�. at.' `� - . �K�� ,.�,.,.,� �� .. �. r . w ��,.�� ''` <' .�,c'� ,.�, . � �� —�a�'� �a�"+�s.�yy,'i�~'�� Y+-� ^� .. i .. .k n''a.S��{�-w" .-. � �., �, �ti �. '?-�" .x> ,"�.9 r.. �` •�."� , l ��b� ,��.r�y a� �r�,+ r„�y- y , ,� '+tir-�,g � r , 4 ��a� � ., � �i. ' e i� � Ss ' �' �i �� .�� .i"��i�C� �>. �, J -.; r �. �, .y�+. • :'�'3'�. a`� � s� i-�t✓�� , �-��,,,'�.�� y,cw�yt �; .. b � �� `.� � .r f'2*!� ..�_ �c. -�a,c,.�`'�,a7 �:,�5'�' �. i � 1Lr . �j'� v °�/��,-�. •+' tt.� �.�' �f �c �as��'�" a r�o�'.'�� It°>tA �:�°°� �'n�� , S �� 1 �;5� ' �i*a Y'_� '�i��1� : . . �: - <r`�+� ry`�,��,v,; > �• ,'�w�Es"' ,�,,..•: ...r..� e �e �Y3ae� ..1�.,. "� r� ��:i Big Soos Creek Outfall under 116th Ave SE G�S Y �,�` ` + � + �FNTO� Bi Soos Creek at 116t" Ave SE Sed iment Control g Project Background Problems: Vicinity Map f �'� ',ti.. 3� r�f " � ' , i� ' y:�.- .c-�r3 •� v,•.,�:.. R t � ]{��.y� t ``+�� p „ f t�+ - -.�.,�� •,� e. ' �/'!.. «� s� >��, w�_b/a • i � I'��:.. t.' ''��a� . � �� ✓'S�a � �c' . �, `••�••. Significant sedimentation has been observed in the Big _ _! �� ,� _ ��, :* ._- - . �,; �-;;:��*��, .�,� -.�►� �' � �;�} �4 ..t � . � ��; t �� . �"� - - • � �... Soos Creek channel from 116th Ave SE to SE Petrovitsky �� ,-� �►�-�-� . �. r i - --�• �! �-�,'"'�,=t �.�, • �, i•n�'��.— t�, . `;`'S�� :. ��X :�,1 � ��h.�.+ . ,y. '��'�,. ��.� �' _ � N ,.{y, , �� e .- r Road. .��,��*�>�'��' �= ;�� .�-- M. •�'��:�. . � �� ;.,� , �.s��.�:�� .:t :.ry+�' :r�1f�' � 1 .vy.r_�.�_.�i f�! '� � \ ly ~ � /;.�T +�'�- • Bi Soos Creek runs throu h rivate ro ert , makin it -�^�J �X' � _t � � ��'- � � �' �� -�� g g p p p v g r:...�� :•��. , .: ; �� .., � � * �. �,�. � f- , r.�"'�. ;��.`- ti�`_it� f. �"f .�.* � ,%'�'�',�! `�.,;.R� ,,�; rt :-Il=:.� difficult to maintain. r�►r,-:�.� .�� -. r-�t �.,�,.�r . � �> , ��i ��c. �"� ;-+� � r r • �+ j c�_� � ^;.r�-� t _ ��w�: 4. _:�,Jr `r� �,� ,' ; Excessive vegetation growth and reduced conveyance �-,��;. --�_- � ;= �-,� �' • � I� t �",-� `�`��•�u " �� ". .. 4 t�A r. � �� M � �t� r �i� - �." ,-�. 'i capacity of the channel increase risk of flooding. �''�� --��►, x:�.�;��;�-�-�: -'��`' -� '� '��_ .�.-.r. � . � ..�►'-�+� '�:�. �+�M � �r �R—, -� �� ,. Pro osed Soos Creek Watershed fine sed iment Total ^`� �� ' '�'r��" ` �'-` ,==_�''��':�;�`�;..,�:`='-. • p `,�� ...s�r�,.. ,.�",�!a�!�.`� _ .��,,. �� .v � . ��: ��„�M. , Maximum Dail Load limit TMDL com els Renton to : � r�::s�.�Y• �- �, � ''!� Y ( ) p .� ., �<- �=»� ��,� .� �� - '�, +. ��._ .. � .. ,c_,_.. _� .-'' � - --�`'�,� reduce eak flows and fine sediment dischar e to Bi Soos � �=�;;�F--:��,� '`� � �� ._�-��r�-�� , � � � .�: -.,,.-,. p g g ' :t�; 1 � � .� ,. '�i�}�� `r � •.�j, �� .-'j � ��w.:.t'�.�u�� jr ��''T� _�'•� '�=^�'`t. -�f ~��7�':1�'� C re e k. . � _ ,.. .t�- � � r.;i�.r`-',��_,�.; -'�^�-�' •;�-,.. �',�:,, :� � ��, a —��-7c- ��,r.- �;��i �� ^ `�`�r,��,,,C,'.�' �`��.,�► ��'.,� 4+� i�'•�- '�,�1�J �. . � f�W�w��'� � � /��.t'ilz- ��.� •+�... �r�' ...�'-� � ti`i� � r r�� ..� �_�. ` *, 1 �,,�� .,� �� r,�.�.�,,,�.; ; .:�i�,� �;f.,� ,�c;� ; +� � r• � ♦—� ... � Y�� '�3'i�� :� T �'. . ��. 1:w�� .��; ��_ . .� ��,s, ,l�r�ti.�� .��;,.,3� �:,, ,�.: � �+ �- �t�`� �. __ ; � � . .� � �'. ��i��}-��` ';�.—��- —F3-� i rti�.y„x ;"� ;' ��r�� = •��t'�,�� t'—��*!!�„``•' —•_� ,.-- �'{�.��'�``"''— '► �'- �_ '.- - . ��,L'+:.a ,r°� `�. �3 �j Y �.c -•�-?"—w'" --��- _ ,�..��;�;�� +1.`� ,� '• '�,:��p;,j�. ' ;�,. L + r _ � + � + �FNTO� Bi Soos Creek at 116t" Ave SE Sed iment Control g Project Objectives Proiect Obiectives: � �.�,,, � �.�. 1-...�r � • Investigating sediment sources and inputs into BigSoosCreekRunningThrough PrivateProperties � F � = o� , `��b... � . - ', ii; �" � i . - �! t h e s t r e a m w i t h i n t h e b a s i n a t a n d u s t r e a m o f 1 1 6 t h .,� ,r� ,-°. `v :�-�.::,,�. ° ` ; ,,�.��.°T}�.,�- �� ` F ` ` � t��! r; ,e' ,, , �� S� } Ave S E. F ,��s�� ::� .K � �; .�,�r ��_�"" , r:'t . ��,��+`_ c.d t. i 1t � �;�'2.J '�'�j � - v. . ',a � � > .- • Si nificantl reduce sediment de nosition in the '��` . �jj\ ` `. ,� � ' � - ��``'" . .�� =- - ;,-:� g v N '„. �.t -•� �` : �...,.�, ':; � �"`"�� - o"t,.a..''�'�y� channelto decrease flood risk in the surrounding _ - . ,a . _� �� . � , ---Y��.~_�_�� area. ��,��-- • .,..,=:::.�-,.�, ^ _ � �- � ��R:�:� +�v� ��•�w•��+�4O�y�7`�•4<?� �J`♦ ''1 �� .��. eQ`�� ♦Op�te41 ,: ,J � ��`!J� i �.�J�i �I'.. .S-f -�.�.�_- '�1.5; . • Improve the channel's flow conveyance capacity of , " � "�� . � "*A'°� � •-'•�� °" f��` � + �� ` .'.��i a•A�� r � i �a�� , ;I � � . � y: . . . .. _ . . . i��C, . ; . ' � y >r .. .S �' ' ' e r,t< � 7 � � ^ 'a�vi�:°� Big Soos Creek in the project area. �E >�.-�A << �� .� „ >. �i�- . l "y".�',- . .��:;f i- 4: -- �-� o r�4S. y �?r°.e� Jr�. a . ��c 6 '_�t�� j'iiy'. Cn y� ��. i'r"ff4�...' �.y� i .. t ...... .r �'af •_1i�o t ` :� f � � •- <" Y i 1 • Reduce the City's long-term maintenance burden in � R"�" "��R'�-"��`� r -��S�ty •`•, �` °•�-° �� ' •Y� �.�� `j ••=�,;�•- �- i '''�r!� r dl:� �r 1" � c�°�.i•�� "I"� .. '" � • � � . o � .. _ii..... . :y �A �"�ri �•�,� A•f,.iy� � the project area. . � .� P'�� .� . . . � � .. . � .�-.%:r%`��CJ'N . ... . .�� . . . . . . � �� • Meet TMDL requirements, with site-specific data j,:,� -�� - . _ , . � ...�' . � � . _ collection, subwatershed modeling, and implementation of stormwater best management practices (BMPs). G�S Y �,�` ` + � + �FNTO� Bi Soos Creek at 116t" Ave SE Sed iment Control g Contra ct Overvie w Consultant Selection: • Big Soos Creek Culvert Under 118t"Ave SE '�� Reviewed SOQs from 10 engineeringfirm on MRSC -= �. � <r . �4 y� Roste r '��_,� .�`�. - ��1 ` �:Y� ��„�'. � �.��'��",�c 4,�t -c,��"' , �� '.eC+�� , ,�� • Interviewed four top scoring firms � `� ` ��~�° `�" l� � � �� :� ,� �� 4r ` �� N"�. �'�M � n� ' .W � � � -� �.��u.�Y� !�- ,�.< . , ✓. rt � ..� ��'. Y' ,�V .'�X.:J • Tetra Tech Inc. was selected as most qualified firm to _ ��: � - � -- �; ,�� ,��, "-- rovide en�j ineerin services � � ��=�� 4� .� �� '� � � _�� - y js�~� ��}� � b• � ��ti��,,, �,:i,\ .�;,'�' �` �'�s r';� ��'r..�.�'d ~� �w�' 7��' ,i,~��I ��,s� �: �t � � R�� ; -� ;�;: � '�'.'- rF, !ry ♦ ��.'��.,#�5.�'*7' }� "'Z° i�- v _�'A \ ��r`�� "i�� Contract Phas in�: ��- . � , ,w � �� ;�:�� „ , .�. � �:�.. „a.�r � M , �.,• , ,4F,{�'�' _ � ti.:•� �. .� �� ., " �;... �. �n. • Phase 1 — Initial Evaluation and Conclusions, 30% ; � �` �,�`�:�� _' ' � � �z . - ' � �', � �,� �ti �� Design . � ��.�,,��' ��,�, �. ,�,''�` � `� �.;� _ .y.,,��r,� ,�� ;�`p� :�� -'� ,r�{L � • Phase 2 — Design and Permit Support (Future =-_� � ��. �.,.. : 44 ,q - '�E �..:: � - ` �-`, � ��;, M�. �5 `'..��F~ ;y r..�� '--� �:`!�-• �:. � ��'�� Amendment) � �,.� �� 4 � i y ��. a�y.�' 'V k� � } � � ✓ r' .�'� ,+v� 'I . ,��»��° , '�*a�i • Phase 3 — Bid Support and Services During �� `� - ` � `��' 7�'��!�.�, ��R.. ` 't3'� -��" ~ �� -\.'; ,! ��;�1 i�• S: 4Ki,� .�... '�.1, 1 ,�4�.-.��" � .`` ,`_�:,.. Construction Future Amendment :�w;�� w �` +� � �� .. 1 � ) „ _ �. �� :,M,:� � ��,� ,,. ��.'�":�:. � -��"�.��:T_ . G�S Y �,�` ` + � + �FNTO� Bi Soos Creek at 116t" Ave SE Sed iment Control g Scope of Work Scope of Services: Consultant workwill include: 116t"Ave SE Near Big Soos Creeklool<ing North - • Project Management - -�.,�� _ �. � ►� .;:� � �: - � . � � "' ' ti.�. , :l � �: �' • Data Collection and Review -.'" =�� "�_��= 4� �- 3� � } � �' �� -- �. , -y�,. -... �-� .��i -�. '��'_._: ` ,r�. � � ' + �, ..�._�.�. �, . � � ' ..•. - , � • GIS data, as-builts, Soos Creek Fine Sediments TMDL, site Ntr�'� �, � T��, y . �-� � ,� r,� ' -�' =. _ �`�:. ,�. . ,�. � ., � � , ,:. reconnaissance, and stormwater sam lin �, � z -- +�- . _ , p g � ;�': ��. - . r: '`�=��` � ,,,_ �' • Preliminar Surve �'� � - :-_�`� ' �� :� j''� � �R �K v v a �. � � - F;- :� � �� . _ • Hydrologic Evaluation ;� x, " h . y�.� � '- - = ; :ti� - � • Will support identification of sediment accumulation ,�. ,.. _ "�" �- �_. --,�� hotspots ,� � , -- .;. - ., - � �;,;.`�t..� . .� • Alternatives Analysis - ��-�-'�` -�� - _ . ,��-. . �,� \ • 30% Design of Stormwater Improvements r ` , � �� • Permit Pathway Review G�S Y �,�` ` + � + �FNTO� Bi Soos Creek at 116t" Ave SE Sed iment Control g Project Schedule Planning Level Project Schedule: .,�,, �, Big Soos Creek from 116t"Ave SE ' �;,zi,s�",_ • Q1 2026: Data collection and review, preliminary survey ., �,,�..� �;= �. , i , : �4-:. ,r , �..-:::� < <,. ,� f � `ti� ,��;. ;�_>(�R_:;. • "��k•'# �`� � �,,'I'�` `.'°,�N- `� Q2 2026: Hydrologic evaluation and stormwater memo �. . _Y,.i�.,�,- � �: � �Y � i .�� j:;; ; , , , -t,_�� -�y a �` �'4-��. �,�t. �i c' I/ :?,� F ..� ;.r�' • Q3 2026: Alternatives analysis � �;�.' �; �`,'�.,,�� r--� �-E"J �4 `' �" � �— r �- >= ;,i `.�r{' \,� ,�... t��` �� _��" .��' �r•�'"� -"--� • 4 2026: Initiate 30% Desi�+n lans and cost estimate, �,,, .� �` ` *� �� °:-�� , � - ��'-� �� Q V � �� \ ~i�,, - I1"7 ` \� ��!' �a'"w`'L-3 1F.a it:�'i`.�_xrdd . permit pathway review ' ';� +�� ` " - '�. , ��' #:_� - , ,; . ;,�- �� -� _ ��y'�''i ,t .�. - - �h��r`��'� � . + � ��'�� a'G� �'',�,`i�`'�i�� . :� 1� ' �j �C� �r.. �i + '�' - -.� - , . � -�'1 ��y�,[��/�•\ 1��',`� 5��`� �,�li� ��S' _ .E,� y��.� _;4 . . �4 :rl��!""� ,��'� �I f LI � ' f '' 1y . 1 �. �.. 'R y� 4}. � { 1 Cp �.•d.. � ^�.. o • �'> . � - � .G` �• i- .�'�,'�l ;k c �'�i��" ' ��d' �r � �...,� '�1��2.� ti:r, t �.�,•,�t �! :✓�� +,.,. � � ,��' _r�l ��q '� ' . �.�'::- 4 �Y�, cr �� rY� �' "'„�yi M�f'_ Sl,�.� �t ,. ��♦ �i ' �+ " �l�.� � ` , . ..�'.►b]� - ' � .� r . .�s`�E-t.- y� ..J� •`; :i� G�S Y �,�` ` + � + �FNTO� Recommendation to Utilities Committee Fisca l I m pact - ' - • - • - • Sufficient funding is available in the ' • ' - • - • • approved 2026project budgettofundthe ' - _ ' ' - ' contract amount of $289,671 . • ' : ' ' : ' ' • ' = : Budgetforthe BigSoos Creekat 116t" Ave . . - - , . • - - . - SE Sediment Control project (427 .475614) � � � � i s $500, 000 a s of M a rc h 2026 . G�S Y �,�` ` + � + �FNTO� • '- SUBJECT/TITLE: Contract with Recology King County for Garbage, Recyclables, and Compostables Service RECOMMENDED ACTION: Refer to Utilities Committee DEPARTMENT: Public Works STAFF CONTACT: Meara Heubach, Solid Waste Program Manager EXT.: 7389 . • . . • This contract will be funded by customer solid waste rates.The projected overall increase in customer rates for enhanced services under a new contract with Recology King County is estimated at 15%,which is 11 percentage points greater than projected customer rates under a contract extension with Republic Services.See rate details in the attached issue paper. � ' • � • The City of Renton's ten-year waste collection contract with Republic Services expires on March 31, 2027. In June 2025,the city issued a request-for-proposals(RFP)to procure a new ten-year solid waste services contract through a competitive process. In response to the RFP,the city received five responsive proposals from potential service providers. Upon conclusion of the proposal evaluation process, city staff selected Recology King County("Recology")as the preferred service provider. Staff negotiated with Recology over ten meetings and have finalized a contract. Should the city council 1. Approve the proposed final contract for enhanced garbage, recyclables, and compostables services with Recology and authorize the Mayor to execute the final contract(as recommended by staff)? 2. Extend the current contract with Republic Services by exercising one of the contract's extensions (not to exceed two years)? 3. Reject all proposals and instruct staff to issue a new RFP? The contract with Recology would provide residential and commercial garbage, recyclables, and compostables collection as well as processing and marketing of collected recyclables and compostables. Recologywould start providingwaste collection services on April 1, 2027,the day after collection services with Republic Services would end. Recology would provide waste services through March 31, 2027, unless the city extended the contract up to two additional years. Recology would be compensated at the rates set in the contract,which would be adjusted annually based on a consumer price index.The contractor's total revenue over the 10-year term of the contract is projected to be$241,000,000. Recology was selected following a comprehensive and competitive procurement process. Recology is a West Coast-based waste services provider that provides collection services to over 160,000 residential and 15,000 commercial customers in King County. 1 The attached issue paper provides more details about how and why this contract was procured,which services the contract offers, and how the contract would impact customer solid waste rates. � • � � • Authorize the mayor and city clerk to execute the agreement with Recology King County for the projected amount of$241,000,000 for garbage, recyclables, and compostables services from April 1, 2027,through March 31, 2037. 2 . � ,� � • Public Works Department DATE: February 23, 2026 TO: Ruth Perez, City Council President Members of the Renton City Council CC: Armondo Pavone, Mayor Ed VanValey, Chief Administrative Officer FROM: Martin Pastucha, Public Works Administrator STAFF CONTACT: Meara Heubach, Solid Waste Program Manager SUBJECT: Approval of Next Garbage, Recyclables, and Compostables Service Contract ISSUE The City of Renton's ten-year solid waste services contract with Republic Services expires on March 31, 2027. In June 2025, the city issued a request-for-proposals (RFP) to procure a new ten-year solid waste services contract through a competitive process. In response to the RFP, the city received five responsive proposals from potential service providers. Upon conclusion of the proposal evaluation process, city staff selected Recology King County ("Recology") as the preferred service provider. Staff negotiated with Recology over ten meetings and have finalized a contract that would provide waste services starting on April 1, 2027. Should the city council 1. Approve the proposed final contract for enhanced garbage, recyclables, and compostables service with Recology and authorize the mayor to execute the final contract (as recommended by staff)? 2. Extend the current contract with Republic Services by exercising one of the contract's extensions (not to exceed two years)? 3. Reject all proposals and instruct staff to issue a new RFP? RECOMMENDATION Staff recommend that Renton City Council approves the garbage, recyclables, and compostables service contract with Recology and authorizes the Mayor to execute the contract. BACKGROUND Upon the conclusion of a competitive RFP contract procurement process in 2016, the city awarded a ten-year comprehensive garbage, recyclables, and compostables services contract to Republic Services. The contract with Republic Services expires on March 31, 2027. The city, at its sole option, may extend the contract twice in increments of up to two years each. City staff and leadership elected to forego extending the contract with Republic Services and proceed with a competitive RFP process due to several factors: • The city's requirement to comply with an unfunded state mandate requiring the standardization of waste cart colors across the state and the separation of food waste from garbage for all commercial customers. • An opportunity to procure and offer new state-of-the-art and innovative services to Renton's residents and businesses coupled with long-term rate affordability, value, and service reliability. • An opportunity to integrate new contractual provisions and services to support and implement the goals and strategies in the city's draft Zero Waste Plan. • Republic Services' failure to substantially meet the city's contract performance expectations, fully comply with the terms and conditions of its contract, and fulfill commitments made to the city. Performance has been particularly poor in the following areas, as the city's Solid Waste Program Manager presented to the City Council Committee of the Whole on January 26, 2026: Education and Outreach o Republic Services is required to visit or support 100% of multifamily sites per year and 100% of commercial sites every two years. Republic Services has provided less than 5% of the required multifamily support and less than 8°/o of the required commercial support. o Republic Services has failed to provide timely and accurate basic education, such as annual residential guidelines. For the past three years, these guidelines have been late, had inaccurate key information, or been sent to the wrong customers. Community Involvement o Republic Services has not fulfilled its commitment to partner with community organizations via cash and in-kind contributions and to work alongside volunteers in Renton. In the first three years of the contract, Republic Services made efforts to follow through on this commitment by sponsoring and providing outreach at four to seven community events per Issue Paper-Approval of Next Garbage, Recyclables, and Compostables Service Contract Page 2 of 16 year. However, they have shown almost no such support in the last five years. Communication and Responsiveness to the City o Republic Services has been slow to deliver upon many simple and complicated requests from the city. For instance, when city staff requested Republic Services update incorrect information on their website about the cost of special item recycling, it took six requests from staff and four months for Republic Services to update their website. In another instance, city staff requested (in November 2024) that Republic Services review and approve updates to their inclement weather plan for waste collection. Over a year later, and with seven additional requests from the city, Republic Services approved the 2025 updates to the plan in February 2026. Strike Response and Recovery o The city's residents and businesses have experienced three driver strikes during the contract. During this period, no other local waste collection providers had any strikes. o During the most recent 12-day strike in July 2025, Renton received disproportionately lower service compared to other cities served by Republic Services. Renton received the fewest waste-collection events of cities of similar size; Renton was the last city to receive customer credits; and the city only recently received a partial payment of$180,000 for the $270,000 in strike-related performance fees that the city assessed to Republic Services. RFP PROCESS Community Survey Summary In advance of releasing the RFP, city staff conducted an online, 17-question community survey of single-family residents about their service preferences for the city's next waste services contract. The city released the survey in April using the Your Voice Renton platform and received 244 responses. Key responses included residents' desire for reliable service and affordable rates; general satisfaction with the relative affordability of every-other-week garbage and recycling collection; majority support of EV collection vehicles; significant support of education and cart tagging tactics to reduce recycling contamination; strong support for continuing to offer the Clean Sweep program and the collection of unlimited quantities of recyclables and yard waste; and a general interest in potential new no-cost curbside collection services such as small electronics, expanded polystyrene (StyrofoamT"'), and textiles. Industry Review Process Once the draft RFP and contract were complete, prospective proposers were given the opportunity to participate in an industry review process. This inclusive process is unique to solid waste contract procurements and offers service providers in the solid waste industry the opportunity to ask questions about, submit comments on, and request changes to the pre-release drafts of the RFP and waste services contract. In response, a city may clarify, revise, add to, or delete contract terms and provisions in advance of the official release of the RFP to ensure the final RFP documents are clear, fair, and Issue Paper-Approval of Next Garbage, Recyclables, and Compostables Service Contract Page 3 of 16 attractive to all potential service providers. The city released the draft RFP and contract in May 2025 and received 69 comments from prospective providers. When the RFP was officially released in June 2025, the city included responses to all 69 comments and incorporated feedback from some of the comments into the draft contract. RFP Priorities The following priorities were stated in the final RFP. They were strictly observed and woven into all elements of the contract procurement process: 1. Maintain robust and reliable services 2. Minimize customer rate increases 3. Provide convenient customer interactions 4. Support strategies in the city's draft Zero Waste Plan 5. Foster a strong city and contractor partnership 6. Conduct a fair, open, transparent, and competitive RFP process RFP Response The full RFP was released on June 18, 2025. Potential proposers were offered two additional opportunities (in July and August) to submit written comments and questions before the due date for submitting proposals. The city received and submitted written responses to 182 questions and comments during that time. The proposal due date was September 4, 2025. On this date, the city received five responsive proposals from the following service providers: • FCC Environmental Services • Recology King County • Republic Services • Sound Sustainable • WM (Waste Management) PROPOSAL EVALUATION PROCESS As stated in the RFP, proposals were scored on a 100-point system, with up to 45 points for qualitative elements and up to 55 points for the rate proposals. Proposal Evaluation Team The team charged with evaluating and scoring the qualitative elements of the proposals consisted of four city staff from Public Works and Finance. All evaluation team members signed an evaluation committee member statement in which members attested to having no conflicts of interest and committed to objectivity, confidentiality, and diligence to ensure the integrity of the evaluation process. The staff evaluation team was supported by consultant Hans Van Dusen, who provided contract preparation services, advisory support, and a review of wholesale base rate proposals. Another consultant, Sound Resource Management Group, provided preliminary retail rate analyses as well as contract review. The combined local, county, and state government work experience of the six-member team is 99 years, with 139 years of work experience in the solid waste industry, from providing on-the-street operational support to procuring and managing contracts. Qualitative Evaluations (45 points) Issue Paper-Approval of Next Garbage, Recyclables, and Compostables Service Contract Page 4 of 16 Proposers could receive up to 45 points for the following elements of their proposals: • 20 points for proposed and prior operational and environmental performance; • 15 points for proposed and prior customer support and diversion approach; and • 10 points for pricing, experience, and innovation of proposed alternatives and variations. Activities of the evaluation team included the following: • Individual review and scoring of each proposal. • 11 site visits to proposers' operations centers, recycling processing facilities, and compost processers as well as 1 virtual site visit to one proposer's operations facility. • In-person interviews of all proposer teams. • Reference checks with 13 jurisdictions or companies served by the proposers. The rating criteria used by the evaluation team included the following: • Operations (base of operations, fleet management, environmental aspects, containers, route management, and missed pick up response). • Recycling and Composting Operations (contamination reduction work, recycling and composting facilities, and commodity markets). • Local Management and Experience (operational experience, staff qualifications, prior litigation, proposed subcontractors, and support of own staff). • Customer and Billing Support (customer support options, call center staffing and performance, billing support, transition operations, and customer outreach). • Recycling and Composting Support (special item recycling, recycling diversion perFormance, outreach staffing, and strategies to support the city's draft Zero Waste Plan). *It is important to note that evaluation team members were not allowed to view rate proposals before or during their qualitative review process to avoid introducing bias into the qualitative scoring. Rate Proposal Evaluations (55 points) Service providers submitted their proposed wholesale contractor rates in a standardized format. Rate proposals included rates for providing all base collection services identified in the contract as well as pricing on three alternative services for staff to consider adding to the base contract: changing single-family garbage and compostables carts to meet the new state requirements for waste cart colors, purchasing and deploying four battery electric collection vehicles, and shifting to weekly single-family recycling service. During the proposal evaluation process, proposers were offered the opportunity to reduce their initial pricing to further minimize rate impacts to customers. Three proposers submitted lower rate proposals, with Republic Services and WM electing to decline. The proposer with the lowest overall annual revenue requirement, exclusive of the alternatives, received the maximum of 55 points. Points for the other four proposals were adjusted and awarded as a relative percentage of the lowest pricing proposal. Table 1 below summarizes the proposal scores. Rate increases shown in the table were calculated as increases relative to Republic Services' 2026 wholesale rates in the current waste services contract. Issue Paper-Approval of Next Garbage, Recyclables, and Compostables Service Contract Page 5 of 16 Table 1: Pro osal Scorin Summa Rates Points,Annual Overall Qualitative Revenue Ranking Proposer Points Requirements(in Total Score 2026$),Wholesale Rate Increases % 53.7 oints 1 Recology po nts ��8'o M* oins 18/o p 52.3 oints 2 Sound Sustainable o5ns $�$'�M o�nt p 22%% p 25.4 55 oints g0.4 3 Republic Services points ��o'8M points 16/o/a FCC 31.7 39.3 oints 7� 4 Environmental Services points 62o�9�M points 32 points 5 WM 37.1 $30.6M 69.1 (Waste Management) points 990�o points *The Recology rates presented in this table do not reflect the lower final negotiated rates discussed later in this issue paper. While Republic Services' base rates proposal was the lowest by a slight margin, its low qualitative score (the lowest of all five proposers) was a serious concern of the proposal evaluation team and is considered a key predictor of Republic Services' future performance under an extension or a new contract. Coupled with Republic Services' demonstrated past poor perFormance in Renton, the low qualitative score further validated staff's recommendation not to extend Republic Services' contract and to instead recommend award of a new contract to Recology. FINAL CONTRACT NEGOTIATIONS AND RATES Based upon the qualitative evaluation and final rates divulged upon the conclusion of the qualitative evaluation process, all members of the evaluation team recommended Recology as the preferred solid waste services provider. Issue Paper-Approval of Next Garbage, Recyclables, and Compostables Service Contract Page 6 of 16 Issue Paper-Approval of Next Garbage, Recyclables, and Compostables Service Contract Page 6 of 16 More about Reco/ogy Recology is a 100% employee-owned company that provides solid waste services to 12 cities in the region with over 160,000 residential and 15,000 commercial customers. Recology has an operations facility and recycling center in south Seattle and will subcontract with Cedar Grove Composting to process Renton's organic materials. Over the past 17 years, Recology has successfully conducted 19 contract implementations and renewals. Recology has separated itself from its competition through demonstrated excellence in operations, sustainability, education and outreach, and dedicated involvement in the communities Recology serves. Contract Negotiations After completing the evaluation process, staff briefed the Mayor and informed City Council of the recommended finalist. In November, contract and rates negotiations began with Recology. The negotiation team consisted of the Public Works Administrator, the Solid Waste Program Manager, a Sustainability Specialist, and the city's contract procurement consultant. Over the course of ten negotiation meetings, the city's negotiation team and representatives from Recology collaborated to revise, clarify, and add contract terms and services; incorporate into the final contract all commitments made by Recology in its submitted proposal; negotiate terms for the purchase of new residential garbage and compostables carts; develop an option to purchase and deploy two residential battery election collection vehicles by 2031; strengthen work stoppage protections and customer credit protocols; and finalize the wholesale rates. Final Wholesale Contractor Rates During final contract negotiations, Recology's annual wholesale revenue requirement (shown in Table 1) was reduced by $260,000 per year. Recology's annual wholesale revenue requirement (projected for 2026) decreased to $17.9M, which is 16% more than Republic Services' current 2026 wholesale revenue requirement and within 1% of Republic Services' proposed wholesale revenue requirement under a new contract. Table 2 below shows the average wholesale rate increases resulting from recent municipal contract procurements in local cities that set their own solid waste rates. The final column in the table represents the average wholesale rate increases across all customer sectors. Some cities experienced significant wholesale rate increases, largely linked to inflationary rises in labor costs, goods and services, and fuel. Renton's final negotiated wholesale rate increase of 16% is the lowest achieved since 2021. It is important to note that a true side-by-side comparison of solid waste rate increases between cities is inherently challenging to achieve due to a variety of factors, most notably the differences in services provided. Table 2: Average Wholesale Rate Increases in Recent King County Procurements City Year Awarded Contractor Average Wholesale Rate Increase % Cit of Renton 2026" Recolo 16°/a Cit of Auburn 2021 Waste Mana ement 48°/o Cit of Kirkland 2022 Waste Mana ement 53% ^ Contract award depends on direction from city council Issue Paper-Approval of Next Garbage, Recyclables, and Compostables Service Contract Page 7 of 16 Issue Paper-Approval of Next Garbage, Recyclables, and Compostables Service Contract Page 7 of 16 Preliminary 2027 Retail Rates The retail rates billed to Renton's residents and businesses are adopted on a biannual basis by the Renton City Council and are distinct from the wholesale rates the city pays each month to the contractor for solid waste collection services. Several important factors that will influence the final 2027 retail rates are unknown and have been estimated to calculate the preliminary retail rates. These unknown factors include increases in the 2027 King County per ton disposal fee; the 2027-2028 biennial Sustainability and Solid Waste Section operating and interfund budget; the 2027 annual percentage increase in the consumer price index (CPI-W); and the scale of cross subsides between service sectors. Each of these factors were estimated and included in the projected 2027 retail rate increases shown below in Table 3. The projected 2027 retail rate increases are relative to the 2026 retail rates and are proiected and preliminary and subject to change. Staff will calculate the final proposed 2027-2028 retail rates through a detailed rate analysis in fall 2026 and will present a proposed rate ordinance for the city council's review and adoption in October as part of the 2027-2028 budget adoption. Table 3 shows the difference in the overall projected retail rate increases between extending the city's current contract with Republic Services or approving a new contract with Recology. Under an extension, 2027 retail rates are projected to increase by 4.0% on average. If new single-family garbage and compostables carts are provided, as recommended, 2027 retail rates are projected to increase by 15.4% on average under a new contract with Recology. Contracting with Recology for enhanced services and replacing the single-family carts that do not match state requirements equates to a 11.4 percentage point increase over extending Republic Services' contract. Table 3: Projected 2027 Retail Rate Increases (%) 202� Republic 2027 Increase Sector Services Recology (percentage points (extending (new contract) [pp]) current contract o +1�8.7% +14.1 pp Single-Family Residential +4.6/o (+17.0/o w/o new (12.4 pp w/o new carts) carts Multifamily/Commercial +3.5% +11.5% +8.0 pp (carts and 1-8 yard containers) Drop Box* +3.4% +17.7%** +14.3 pp (10-40 yard containers) 0 +1�5.4% +11.4 pp AVERAGE +4.0/o (+14.5/o w/o new (10.5 pp w/o new carts) carts *Drop box retail rates do not include the cost of garbage disposal. Garbage disposal can be 50-90% of bills for drop box services. ** One of the drivers of the increase in drop box rates is the requirement under the Recology contract for solid covers on all drop boxes. Under the current Republic Services contract, solid covers are optional and cost$102.81 per month (in 2026 $). Table 4 below shows estimates of how much more the average Renton single-family, multifamily, and commercial customer may pay per month under a new contract with Recology. Issue Paper-Approval of Next Garbage, Recyclables, and Compostables Service Contract Page 8 of 16 Table 4: Projected 2027 Monthly Retail Rate Increases Sector Service Level 2027 2027 Increase(Month) Increase (Republic) (Recology) (Year) 35-gallon cart Single- $4.46 Family (every other $33.48 $37.94 (13°/o increase) $53.52 week) Multifamily 35-gallon cart $41.11 $44.31 0 $3.20 $38.40 (weekly) (8/o increase) Commercial 4-yard container �477.75 $515.01 �3�'26 $447.12 (1x week) (8% increase) COLLECTION SERVICES DISCUSSION New Services and Contractual Provisions Through the RFP process and final contract negotiations, city staff were able to secure a package of significant, meaningful, and attractive new services and contract provisions that offer affordability, value, service reliability, and enhanced customer service to the city and its residents and businesses. Below are selected highlights of the over 60 new services and contract provisions that would be in effect on April 1, 2027. Additional new services and provisions are detailed in Attachment A to this issue paper. New service highlights include the following: • A new fleet of 21 renewable natural gas-powered (RNG) collection vehicles • An all-electric fleet of contractor support and cart delivery vehicles • An option to purchase and deploy two electric collection vehicles by 2031 • A return to city billing for solid waste services • Implementation of a state requirement to standardize garbage and compostables cart colors • Two full-time Waste Zero Specialists dedicated to Renton • Sunday call center hours • Improved strike recovery provisions Retained Services and Contractual Provisions Numerous services and contractual provisions were retained from Renton's current contract and would continue to be offered, including the following: • Every-other-week residential garbage and recycling collection with weekly compostables collection • Weekly "premium" residential garbage collection • Weekly year-round yard waste collection • Unlimited quantities of recyclables and yard waste • Variable rates and container sizes • Hiring preference to drivers displaced and not retained by Republic Services with the transfer of driver pay and benefit accrual rates • Direct payment of disposal fees to King County • Clean Sweep Program for residential customers • No-cost waste collection services to city facilities and street containers • On-call collection of bulky waste and special recyclables • Holiday tree collection for single-family and multifamily residents Issue Paper-Approval of Next Garbage, Recyclables, and Compostables Service Contract Page 9 of 16 Deleted Services and Contractual Provisions Some curbside recycling services were removed from the new contract to reduce costs and avoid duplication of services already offered to residents for low or no cost at city or Recology store drop-off locations, through the private sector, or through expanded producer responsibility (EPR) programs. These services include curbside collection of compact fluorescent bulbs and tubes, household batteries, and plastic bags and film. There are two other non-essential services that are offered in the current waste services contract but would have added additional costs and were therefore excluded from the new contract: • Procuring and installing up to 20 new sidewalk-mounted public garbage or recycling containers. • Providing no-cost collection of up to 12 drop-box containers per year to support abatement efforts. CITY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION The city council has been briefed on the contract procurement process throughout all phases of the project. The table below represents all major staff touchpoints with the city council to date. Council Body Action/Task Date Committee of the Whole Introduction to the procurement process June 2, 2025 Utilities Committee Update on the procurement process July 7, 2025 City Council Provided names of five proposers September 8, Communication 2025 City Council Provided summary of proposal evaluation and October 27, 2025 Communication name of selected finalist (Recology) Utilities Committee Proposal evaluation overview December 1, 2025 Committee of the Whole Procurement process summary January 26, 2026 City Council Meeting Introduction of final contract with Recology and February 23, 2026 referral to Utilities Committee Utilities Committee Proposal evaluation overview March 2, 2026 City council action to award contract to City Council Meeting Recology or provide alternative direction to March 2, 2026 staff Issue Paper-Approval of Next Garbage, Recyclables, and Compostables Service Contract Page 10 of 16 Issue Paper-Approval of Next Garbage, Recyclables, and Compostables Service Contract Page 10 of 16 IMPLEMENTATION AND COMMUNICATIONS PLAN If council approves the proposed contract with Recology, Recology will immediately order Renton's new fleet of collection vehicles. Manufacturing the collection vehicles will likely take at least eight months, with additional time needed to deliver, test, and install software on the trucks, so ordering the fleet vehicles is the first step in implementing the contract. Within 90 days of executing the contract, Recology will also develop and submit to the city a Transition and Implementation Plan, which will include specific deadlines for tasks such as developing residential routes, ordering new carts, uploading customer data from Republic Services, and mailing welcome packets to customers. At least 120 calendar days before the start of the contract, all Republic Services drivers currently serving city collection routes will be provided the opportunity to apply for driver positions at Recology through Recology's website. Recology will notify the two Teamsters locals that contract with Republic Services to ensure Republic Services' drivers are made aware of the hiring opportunity. Driver pay and benefit accrual rates will transfer to drivers' new positions at Recology. Recology has also committed to informing the city of how many drivers from Republic Services' Renton routes followed their work to Recology. Throughout the transition and implementation period, city staff from Public Works, Finance, and Communications will work together to develop internal operating plans for city billing of waste services as well as robust plans for communicating the service changes to all customers. City staff will regularly brief city council on the status of customer communications and Recology's service transition work. Issue Paper-Approval of Next Garbage, Recyclables, and Compostables Service Contract Page 11 of 16 Attachment A: New Contract Services and Provisions Cate o Service/Provision Details Cost Consumer Price Index Annual CPI percentage increase in contractor rates capped at 6% (current Republic Services contract caps CPI increase at 8%) Recycling and Organics Separate unembedded contractor rates for recycling and compostables Cost Costs collection. This lowers state refuse tax obligation and aids in calculating future Recycling Reform Act reimbursements. Customer Service City Billing Customers will be billed monthly by the city for waste collection services Call center hours offered on Sundays, 8:00 AM — 5:00 PM. Call center Customer Service Call Center staff live locally and can connect customers to interpreters and a relay service for hearing-impaired customers. Customer Service Expanded Special Item Added no-cost recycling collection of textiles and small electronics. Recycling Expanded special item recycling to multifamily residents. Residents provided access to Recology's network of stores to drop off Customer Service Recology Store Access difficult-to-recycle items such as Styrofoam, fluorescent bulbs/tubes, and small propane cylinders at no cost Customer Service Clean Sweep Clean Sweep offered to single-family customers year-round (added January and February service) Customer Service Missed Collections Allows perFormance fees and customer credits for three or more missed collections at same service address in a six-month period Improved Inclement Weather To expedite recovery from extensive weather-related service Customer Service disruptions, Recology may suspend weekly compostables collection Response and redirect those collection vehicles to collect garbage Attachment A: New Contract Services and Provisions Cate o Service/Provision Details Customer Service Second Recycling Cart Additional recycling cart available for nominal fee Improved App-based messaging allowed. Contractor required to use automated Customer Service Communications dialing services, app-based alerts, and/or texts to communicate holiday- related service changes. Disabled Customer Single-family customer applications for no-cost disabled carry out Customer Service Carry-out Service service will be managed by city for consistency with other utility discount programs Website must be accessible to customers with impaired vision and Customer Service Contractor Website comply with Website Content Accessibility Guidelines. Time-sensitive alerts must be posted on website within 3 hours. Customer Service Customer Privacy Contractor shall not sell or provide customer information collected on its website, mobile app, or other electronic media to third parties During office hours, contractor must respond to questions from city Customer Service Responsiveness to City within 4 hours of city leaving or sending a message. If after office hours, contractor must respond by noon on following business day. Customer Service Appliance Collection No annual limitation on number of old appliances that may be collected Education Waste Zero Specialist Two full-time contractor Waste Zero Specials dedicated to providing education, outreach, and contamination monitoring services Contractor required to mail service guides to all residents and Education Annual Service Guides commercial customers each year by January 1. Performance fees for each day guides are late. Education Special Events Contractor required to provide outreach at Renton River Days and up to 3 additional community events each year at no additional cost Issue Paper-Approval of Next Garbage, Recyclables, and Compostables Service Contract Page 13 of 16 Attachment A: New Contract Services and Provisions Cate o Service/Provision Details Education Tote Bags Recycling tote bags provided to multifamily customers at no cost Contractor provides flyers, stickers, signage, and door hangers. All translated material required to be transcreated to capture the essence, Education Outreach Materials tone, and cultural nuances of the source content while adapting it to suit the target audience's language, culture, and context. Required translations/transcreations include Spanish and Vietnamese. Education Performance Fee Contractor may be assessed a performance fee for failure to meet at least 50% of multifamily and commercial outreach requirements Reported community engagement activities must be directly related to Education Reporting community education and outreach and should not include attendance at regional forums such as SCA or SWAC Environment All Electric Support and All electric support vehicles for operations staff, outreach staff, cart Delivery Vehicle Fleet deliveries, bulky waste collection, and special recycling collection Option to purchase and deploy two all-electric collection vehicles on Environment Electric Route Trucks routes by 2031. Savings of$60k/year for length of contract by using two older trucks in interim period. Environment Cleaner Burning Gas All collection�vehicles will be fueled by natural gas with a low carbon intensity (50/o or less of the state low-carbon standard) Domestic markets prioritized for recyclables. Plastics required to be Environment Recycling Markets recycled in North America. Requirement to comply with Basel Convention prohibiting the export of hazardous wastes. Destination countries of rec clables must be re orted. Environment Spillage Reporting Contractor required to immediately clean up all spills and notify city spill hotline and the Department of Ecology Issue Paper-Approval of Next Garbage, Recyclables, and Compostables Service Contract Page 14 of 16 Attachment A: New Contract Services and Provisions Cate o Service/Provision Details Contractor required to inspect recycling and compostables containers Environment Contamination Monitoring for contamination each year at all multifamily and commercial and Education properties. Contractor provides corrective support when contamination observed. Environment Recycled Content All educational materials required to be printed on 100% recycled paper Environment Solid Drop Box Lids Requires solid lids on drop box containers (10 to 40-yard containers) Added performance fee for container lids that are not closed after Environment Container Lids service is provided, particularly for lids pinned next to a wall or enclosure Environment Wildlife-Resistant Carts Residential wildlife-resistant carts available for an additional charge Operations Route Collection Vehicles New fleet of 21 side-load residential, front-end load commercial, and drop-box collection vehicles New Garbage and New or reconditioned garbage carts(gray/black) and compostables Operations Compostables Carts carts (green) to harmonize waste container colors within city, region, and state Includes same-week recovery of missed collections (if possible), Operations Strikes defined formulas to calculate customer credits, expedited credit calculation and credit reimbursement to the city, and automatic deductions for erformance fees. Operations Operations Plan Requirement to develop an annually updated operations plan Issue Paper-Approval of Next Garbage, Recyclables, and Compostables Service Contract Page 15 of 16 Issue Paper-Approval of Next Garbage, Recyclables, and Compostables Service Contract Page 15 of 16 Attachment A: New Contract Services and Provisions Cate o Service/Provision Details Operations Overweight Collection Requires monthly reporting of overweight vehicles and performance Vehicles fees for each overweight vehicle Operations Slotted Recycling Lids Optional lockable slotted lids for multifamily dumpsters to prevent bagged recyclables and contamination Upsized current mini-can size from 13 gallons to 20 gallons to provide Operations Mini-can additional capacity, reduce inventory challenges, and achieve compatibility with collection equipment Operations Multifamily Countertop Available to all multifamily properties and households Food Scrap Containers Contractor must collect overflow garbage next to public cans. Operations Public Garbage Cans Geolocated map of all public trash containers serviced by contractor to ensure consistent service and ease of collection for substitute drivers Quarterly reporting of tonnage collected from dedicated route serving 5 Operations City Facilities largest waste-generating city facilities to help track waste reduction goals Operations Recycling Reporting Annual recycling composition study of loads collected from single- family, multifamily, and commercial routes Monthly reports of multifamily and commercial customers not Operations Compostables Reporting subscribed to compostables service. Monthly reports of total contaminated containers. Reporting on estimated amount of garbage in collected com ostables. Operations Collecting from Performance fees for collecting from customers who have been Suspended Customers suspended for non-payment Issue Paper-Approval of Next Garbage, Recyclables, and Compostables Service Contract Page 16 of 16 • . on rac wi � eco 0 Garba e, Rec clables , and g y Com ostables Services p UTI LITI ES COM M ITTEE, MARCH 2, 2026 MEARA HEUBACH, SOLID WASTE PROGRAM MANAGER � � � � � � '� ' _ - , _ i . � . .,,. . .� ,, ,,;;�r. ` '��. � ' -- � yC� � — " .-- ~ � .// _ � ' ;%� _ .a��_�.��. . .w.��... /; '� • � � � ��. . �r � ♦ � _ _ � . _i��!C . �. • �f} • . �� \ - — �y�� fJ . 1 i ., .. •�� ' �� 'i/�',M� I///� ♦ . f�� 1 \ I ... - -,� _ .1� f � 1 _ `�,. `� _ ' �� - - - _ . , . . , . . - , _ . _ / � ��_ -- ��- - . ._ , � , � �� ...,. _ = � � , F + j ,�"`�/ �\11 I/' ~� - � � � � �r i!'� ; ' � '' � � � ' � � ti � `I/ ,// `..!•� i Y � - 1�`~�� i I : - � 1 ./ � � �/r i�+�r, `+� �: f .� , / �/ � ' ■ ��l,�:�%A:", /� � \ � � . • � � • l�/I�Y.;I'.�� . �r� �-� ��i�:•f. � �� .. � ,_ c, - - .- _ _ • - : _ � _ _"� =*�k : - �� - _ _ .��i_r y �� _ , r 4 ''. � � '��r` � - • x_ � � � _ _ . �� -� =; �-. :, �: _ : f; _ � � . � • � � � � af� � �- �� yP - � I ..,� ,, �� i�� i�� rt� ti�.-�;t, I� js ,,,._ r • .t 1 Release RFP June 18, 2025 �' '� � ;'�� '�' = _�- - � • `�.�`� ��s�►� - _� - �< �:�'�� - � _ _ � ;� �- Receive proposals September 4, 2025 � _ ' �,.�, . `�.,��i, � , ;�.. I�� ` _ � I�� " � �'. � .i Select finalist October 2025 Q,� �. a� �► ' �; ` ' � � � November 2025 - ��, Negotiate contract �" +� -�- � � January 2026 - • . � �:-�1� -_-r Finalize contract February 2026 -- -- i� - . ; - � V 'i�.{ Council decides on contract March 2026 - � ��- � '� ; � - - _ _ . � � - - = , _ . � `:.. Republic Services' contract ends March 2027 _ �� . � �� 8. ,_ �� _--= , `": -. . -:. - - ; . �`> � � � �-� . . � � � � � � � _ __ - - ._ � �. , - -- _ ----- � �, � � � � .�� • • �,� . $ , � �� '��'�,. - � . - • • - � - - - � I � �� • • • • � • . . . • - - . � � ; >s :`_. � � _ -� _ • ..,, - �:. . ' �. - �-- -�,., ;•._ �t 'c � _� '�►- �'g:' -� ' �``��_._n�_�.''''''�. � {� `-Y` ��: 1 ��. ' 'L�� $r�: J iw• .l� �� 1' �� 'D`�,{4,� •�'"�, �.� � `. � - '� 6j _ � � � � — � ,.:3: _ .�f• � � . � . � g+.y�d�q�gl.9' ��W �� Y l. . u •'tUor �'. v'i'=. .i'� . ��, ._ . '1.� • . • . / • � • � . ��^� .. ' � �w..__.,. , „ ...� � � � • / • � 1.c � •iL�-' . �y - � , 9 k. . ... ��. . - �ri.,. �!_ ._._—__._._'� �c� i� r4 c � � -';: .;eY � �,M"^ . �3' , � > � ,s y ,�,cgi�, ; r ,� *E;]a y t+. �;,%. . •��'�.'y,� a* a�-.,4 � 1�� ,�k ys F.' � �':' ��.�1 "s„ >w��k ;�:7'�� ..-y. f,�Y �..f Y a�,��'. " `��.T`. Su ortforDrivers pp • Recology "shall give hiring preference to any Garbage, Recyclables, or Compostables collection workers who serviced City routes for the previous contracted hauler...and were displaced as a resultofthe Cityawardingthis Contract:' • "Upon hiring a displaced collection worker represented by Teamsters Local 117 or 174, the Contractor shall be required to keepthe displaced workerwhole regarding the workers' pay and benefit accrual rates earned as of the date of displacement:' • "The Contractor must reimburse any displaced worker for any required COBRA payment to retain health care coverage during the time between displacement and when the worker would become eligible for such benefits under the collective bargaining agreement:' • "At least one hundred twenty (120) calendar days before the Date of Commencement of Service [April 1 , 2027], the Contractor shall allow collection workers who serviced City routes for the previous contracted hauler to apply for collection worker positions under this Contract through the Contractor's website and shall notify the applicable Teamsters local of the opportunity so that the Teamsters local can publicize it to their members:' Estimated Total Monthl Cost for y ResidentialService 35 - alloncart $60 $50 $40 $30 ■ 2026 ■ 2027 (estimated) $20 $10 $- Auburn Bellevue Covington Redmond Renton Tukwila Estimated Total Monthl Cost for y CommercialService 4CY �900 �800 ��oo $600 $500 ■ 2026 $400 ■ 2027 (estimated) $300 $200 $100 $- Auburn Bellevue Covington Redmond Renton Tukwila Cou nci l O tions p . . _ , . Contract with Extend with Reject Recology . . Proposals Republ�c Serv�ces 10years Timelineunknown U p to 2 yea rs Enhanced services Services unknown Same services (Staff recommendation) • • _ --—_. _._.._. .__._ � - � ..__ � ._ _. _ � - i"�► ` yl� • 'e"� � �, .,,� u. } � �_� � � i, '� .,.....�_ , � ' _�� _ � "�* � ` ......� �...._ .:_...�..�.s�• . . , � , �'` R � _ . � ^ � IYl. � ' �y� } • i _ I. ♦ < :: . ^ `/� , .:� . . " T ' � " . f ,, � " �. � ,. . , ^ . _—_— :.. �� _��. . � .i,.'.�� ,'�.. —._ —-- �i� _ _s.,.,. __. w .,..... � '^'�i` , _ . ._.. ______—____ . ., —_ _— �g !�' � I i I � . . _ ' ' . �I -- � � � { � r,F ' ":';�`�.M1�:.: ..:� � ' f ' t- 1 q �� / — � g�a ri�' �". T �� A: � 4 .� �t�;. .'�.'-` '�' .. } . _ .. . , .3, �. ., "' r.� ��c. � r � � .r � ✓'��' yr��. % `tM�, �� ftit �. ?��''' ��.a:.� �` , �,J,'/,,yr.�e�C�t„� ,�' � �` `�,�# •x g�e`.: ,F, t� +� , _ _ .Sj! � ,.� . �lfr�'•ra�y�•i�"'i.. "�' ; .'�.� ,.� "m . . .c �a�y. � i�i�, v a .� � . . ii 1 i�' 111�?�,�y� ��F .F '��4' ,N f�. _ wP' :°�i..�,.''�,:��,�. �� •.'�.: � �. � _ : , , . � _. ._. ,.- -e�-.�-- , ' _ _. ;�. � ,�.:�_. w,z