Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA88-121 BEGINNING OF FILE FILE TITLE gns, S K , EF Inbad• 4.1 uuaelON6 454,4 , / . iLtdd 41; / 79,„,..einwrdy eankvA. attekheit • ti . _-t._` _esa__�_� __ . —REORDER: Indicate quantity Om each negative, • REORDER: Indicate quantity above each negative. IIIISNilk3iiitilliiiiii@Eilliii11115111111111111111111111111111 • rrF REORDER.Indicate quantity above each negative, . t7GGQ0000GGUElElEl r. t l L' '. . ' . R `®' REORDERLIndicate uantity above each negathe = ..; r1tlt ® ! ® • ® R11R111 ® i911111 $ 11- • R ® rT`-- 'ice .,.': s-z {_r,;s h:;Fid, . - - 7-11 j. REORDER Imitate quantity above each negative, • • • • • ® ® R ® 1I ® Ira RRRlir1RR ® 11RR11R ® ® • ® ® RR ® i • . -..-,_ __ - _ - - - --__ti ��.` _��,':..i.;.]aai�]'111_i-�..?'1'.f!:��i:-'_` :-'�I�i�L�i.l':•.`I,i-�L•,l�i� �.._..,.W_�._.,,�_�..__�._--- �_r�•� _._ y. ,,.. REORDER Indicate quantity above each negative. • ! 000C„000000 000 30r. A El if ,g 1 Date ()AMU 2,Cp, lgE3c( 11 Subject a_o MUls,'-1 tO NUArL 3I c1\) .. R - I2I - `3 SHARE YOUR MEMORIES WITH •t;, - Date ()AMU 21p ' q 5c( Subject 0L1) k-)A-1 10 ivAL, 15 AMC, )A - - .• SHARE YOUR MEMORIES WITH ,• . . . • - _ • 4 • ----..---- . • •1 . .. . • " •es, ' • l' 4.• :e —• • " V - 41 I . Ih'ilr APP.- IT Ii. • — 4 r • , a --, • • • . .•• . - -mow :.....,_ • ••. _ . . 1 r. . "' , ' .00001.1.1111111111. 1 lit.roorwo* ..! , ... -• , . AZ -.. , • 1 . . , . ,... • 1 • -4 b 111 „,„„.......::::...,I.,-..,,.,,:. . 4,14ror„ • .I. . - •.-.: .- ,..a. .7. . . ,. - I , %.„,,...11** .1 ...41 iii-tL f......-17-751.7' el:.- !.•'.: • . •1!• ''' ' 'II. i• ',› tito-1 .., ,-.......,- e 1 '01;• N.•' 'r .1 . • . I Ili=:1 — . . -..-........._.., 4111 -.. . illtillilliii"111.111111.1116 a .• • • 41.441,..e.gligh.04,•410.4,16.•:taile•Mr 44...r 6 I i di • g_!%lek . I 2 i—AA R �.. +k r w. 4 4 1 iiii ..plivte..... . _ 9 . 11111111. Aft JJ �r t Y dak " .. _• ; t r y .—.10 • .i • #dam__ I �"r.,. . �- i ,� .,„ • dilli A- : � i ;mow. .i j:` i • imii% Ca LA : _ ga. I I I-A% Aw.... . it Y•wp" • , •• z 1 t r ....: ,, „ ' . - 4 .... . , ' 0 . . ..:• . 1 , . .. . 4\I , iiii.! 'll s- JP -- -11.,' i ..- >j i h'�« r t r - t • r M r• *.1 .+ i I+ ' 1. 11: • : '' . ... r •I: 1 l . ,'Oliotl illiN .';Ir. .—' 1• y r. 1.ti- � • -I'4 j • ,..1.... ao • y 4 � � i.f.B.' ,- I >� J I owl t N 4u.W 11.sag wa�..a MG M . Paa I;T1 . - wed av rnna�s�% , arkfie. T. .„.a .- .411b.11.A.LialeavileaTimiva..1,40,-.- 4.,._ mi. ......._....... ...............„. j • � .4.r•. ' j • L_ -wJ./1mbr� • ,( an...sure, I • '•, aril onaraxe-1. 11. } xca'A 4. .q,a \ r/ . • • '/• '(..,N s•" }:ll(�.a(•�c,:.:'h1::A<x'2.:l*iLB$,CO�.i o:H-tY. ... 1 . �. l wn..-d#a.+ma ram+ a t� .a..•- r _ _CIF . • vD w.9+R • - . Z - v I rs';, '91YI1Sf%3 sr �-71vre,:xarn� , Za HJv"ill jC[31PJIOnf sy rvrdvxanr, • ]\ a I '`.,r�,-Y` 9IC-A37y Sa111.:Ord iv ZQS .' j 1M p 7 • I ! -cr wv..w rr? i 33s 1iaYrdv7sarai M3N 31raranr •.r3ar a;n'A9. :3rn� J'sI a tM�io�� 4.14 r. oto.J .. • •-o �• e, 'e,z. I r wv A I 7 c+z O ACieVIIM,a ac» ' NMu, I —+-� Hatt•--- � - 9Mai1G .W N"oYti'J1.V3 r——— r UH%gAA il.'7'Od2 6161.4 xf13N M.,20 N MI g� Peel a `:4 8 I WONNKS:11Az1d-37B:1� �y r"KlrieWH/�J'1 V•YIMfIJ 1N(1t3XM1/. •4 I I 'T'11 4, d1 .00 rill.1,-.4 a1.71,4'1.sa•�.1 1d • • Zr• 1-- -- 4o -.-.„:'L;.r•`-'.?�r i �y 'OW'9H.W.2-13101A V.F/11.I�1i 0aGHd-® ."a,a• ,.� {Un1 �f�.. CD � 13 '_r�r1H.Oh,a YJ.461'.'kl rd1"1/19 en�yy%3 b• l �h,Mp . ! Vt+0 Jtl r1•, ,....W Vx19JeG17r� r_ f err+1a rvn(i7 =,o-1w Z albtl,ol•,®r..m.y(I-.�( vrrrlma12s xlvuu • • -smia-marr-a%-• � rbfu , I i VIVI siM-1,1"-n.gt-.2 33149r1J1J � ��,,/Jy� - =wrraNs9-nnrr-' welt,nnn \ • �1 yl,� • NOISN YdX3 -----a--- furl vnaNm 3n au c-rivua onue,a 9i I • 9Mi Y17I1i 2C71NdA` V47 r'iH,1;v IINdOfY1N15(INId • 3313WO ` -- . ..L.,..... ,+z.aia aavcranvra M10..W1rr'r01I ue atizi �pyyyl -..eeluoi HEM rYM -4'ti rra* prune 1,Z nm. auuslm.l rrn) - - J--fj.�'n{ • 4al'O6 010g-4S9(900 343Hd - axes rrOJI,U- VM 1D.8 • • ZOL 31r16 is S3Vdtlf'M 9YOL . • 30AOy��/y 1O /W I J • . • • 99-I.z-11.Ifa I roN"aLOG3.ON Vaf . • WIA+af.a .Pa roN weld 31./ \/, • 9N51,�.48n l09'EIL �1_� . — r Nv1d vl9 — ---- _ f1YAW g a3 I.. / i•r.�•...', l i.. . - .... '3 .Y.SY-' . y.. .�:.�.. ..1.•,.+3.�Y = ' - .s;v.'✓.r f..: }Ee0fan�6Llw- lS F ' rn �f-1—L'hi3/ro n fovi. J •Irus 13g13t a r . '6 s�n, 3I {Gd ' � 1bM1ir9Y ryW�' a 07 Yzd� BdID'an3 v l I 1 I I � a-as 1 I I k or JaJotss I 1 �n.n,ab• 10,0 004000 IP Iend,.r,-9'YDIG IGscano, cn�Ia a a I w ta1 (d.YUuenrw,pL— 1 I1 �}I oi ct) L. SI-NLS BN1Ls.xa 6 ree •I jl.PPAA y nd a �— / N -l•r,.mrl3Ncaal 1 o-nY:6 ran(-It. �la-�La - y. I P 1 3o"I?,1.,..„ •ao aYMi-3 . NOISNVdX3 • a. �n JNIO�InB �� 1 u • I 301dd0 •-f 1 ILt i i I a.Le,ao.9d6 liz'QI ---2.:. ' ..,9..\\„........_____ • IMIINIINfY.f031Y1f L 30AOXXOY Yff'SO1 W.I.Xp I V Yr3oY! AG•ibL Y3N � IIO QUID 1'ral. TJ3i1Yr1 ii9 MINA 031LSIal1l 11[f - --B.O 9�aNVN --- I ' Mi -- "--1 WLots,.. 01.09499(904 3JOHd ZW96 NO.LON-ISVM'MEN ZOL 3171S`1S S3WHI"M 940L f u7sunsrm S103LIH0UV 30n01-NOUI!CIMn a , . . . OHAORONHOVDE ARCHITECTS con ',DWG __ (TTPO.AL) 1 1048 W.JANES ST,SUITE 102 KENT,WASEVGTON 98032 __ 1 -....7.4."Miiiiiiiin'4N6 PHOIE:(206)854-5010 _ - - -_ •.,:' ' I I! 1! I=- --±--. [ 1 n _ - = -- = _ „ __. -.._ r.,-- ,----- . --- __-_-.-- ,---,1 - -=_T- \WNW 1 ..: = =- -=_ I ' '==--- ------=- - __---. -,.._.- -,-.--._ [..c...1...6 'be2tO• E4CCANtEt zir.ucrufkE • .4 en.R.4..M..e <t• V NORTH ELEVATION OFFICE • • . BUILDING..'4 . ./ EXPANSION ;--- .:: _ -.. ram• ili ....----------1-- MillIM- 2-= I es.m.4 zoro.,e, Il ---.. , _ ••-• ---__ 1. 11 Ill -- -=---=- _____ _ -- ____ = ---- -_,-_- _ _L- DI I - . . -.......,...... ,1922.ologr(."."91 <...,..,._16-ne4107119S. 0 Ette7 NG.orar..U.70... ,0 • . SOUTH ELEVATION it,'.1,0' • , _ - . - - -•=- ----- - -'-- 4,-- - -:----- - - •:-= _-_-_- _. _ , .- --=-7- ,,f ••• i___ F.,- ,---1- '-',\,5-=-- _ • ............,43 e£,-.1- • —=co v5...1EE2 fr•R) WEST ELEVATION • • v6.1,,,..0,1 . - r Sam Contents — . SAInOW 3 - . LV . . . • ... ..• . .ir Fleetemea E__. I I E -'--!1 ,f • • • No. Date Deactlatbn -E....e...1c, 'ave.-4J t...ik,,c, .,L.s..5,4 . . 14i'°:' Joe No.8637 13O•at No. EAST ELEVATION 0...er-rg — Y6:1-oil . . Check.BY Wing g'''''Et ? ._ Data 11,2q-se, . . . , —...... . . , .. . Public Notice Public Notice below described has hereinbelow has here- acres, being located at the southwest tofore been zoned as 0-P (Office Park); corner of N.E. Fourth Street and Brem- and erton Avenue N.E.) WHEREAS, a proper petition for change SECTION II: This Ordinance shall be of zone classification of said property has effective upon its passage, approval, and been filed with the Planning Division on or five days after its publication. about December 15, 1988, which petition PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this was July referred to the hearing examiner 26th day of June, 1989. for investigation, study, and public hearing, Maxine E. Motor and a public hearing having been held City Clerk thereon on or about April 11, 1989, and APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 26th said matter having been duly considered by day of June, 1989. the hearing examiner, and said zoning Earl Clymer request being in conformity with the city's Mayoi comprehensive plan, as amended, and the Approved as to form: city council having duly considered all mat- Lawrence J. Warren ters relevant thereto, and all parties having City Attorney been heard appearing in support thereof or EXHIBIT "A" in opposition thereto; Legal Description for SUNSET NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUN- SQUARE (Dochnahl) CIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASH- Rezone 121-88 and Site Approval iNGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: 121-88 SECTION I: The following described The Northwest 1/2 of the northwest 1/4 property in the City of Renton is hereby of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest rezoned to B-1 (Business District), as here- 1/4 of Section 15, Township 23 North, CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON inbelow specified, subject to the findings, Range 5 East, W.M. EXCEPT the west OR:)INAN,E NO. 4222 conclusions, and decision of the hearing 7.5 feet thereof; J,REL,/..:.,L OF THE CITY OF examiner dated April 14, 1989, and subject AND EXCEPT the East 80 feet thereof; RENTON, WASHINGTON CHANGING further to restrictive covenants filed under AND EXCEPT that portion conveyed to THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF King County Auditor's File No. King County for road by Deed recorded CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE 8906090199, and which said covenants are under Auditor's File No. 5831773; CITY OF RENTON FROM O-P (Office hereby incorporated and made a part here- EXCEPT all coal and minerals and the Park) TO B-1 (Business District) — of as if fully set forth, the Planning Manag- right to explore for the mine the same; SUNSET SQUARE (ONB) (DOCH- er is hereby authorized and directed to Situate in the County of King, State of ..'.HL), FILE No. R-121-88 change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance, Washington WHEREAS, under Chapter 7, Title IV as amended, to evidence said rezoning, Subject to: reservations, rights of (Building Regulations) of Ordinance No. to-wit: record. 1628 known as the "Code of General Ordi- See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and Also known as Lot 1, KCSP 1079069 nances of the City of Renton," as amend- made a part hereof as if fully set forth Auditor's File #8002040734. ed, and the maps and reports adopted in herein, Published in the Valley Daily News Jun( conjunction therewith, the property herein- (Said property, approximately 1.41 30, 1989. R3592 2 -! l O. AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION • Audrey Benner ,being first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the VALLEY DAILY NEWS • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week. That said newspapers are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King County, Washington. The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal k newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Kent Edition , Renton Edition X , Auburn Edition , (and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice a Ordinance No. 4222 June 30 , 198965D, was published on - • The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of$ 79 . 80 Subscribed and sworn before me this 19th day of July 19 89 No Public for the State of Washington residing at Auburn, King County, Washington VDN#87 Revised 4/89 j r V s J 0 0- CITY OF RENTON "LL , - FINANCE DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk August 10, 1989 Mr. C. Dennis Dochnahl 2006 Redmond Avenue N. E. Renton, WA 98056 RE: Declaration of Restrictive Covenants Sunset Square File Nos. R; SA-121-88 Dear Mr. Dochnahl: Enclosed is the copy of the Declaration of Restrictive Covenants for the above-mentioned rezone and site approval. This document has been recorded. with King County and shows the Recorder's number. Very truly yours, THE CITY OF RENTON Maxine E. Motor City Clerk MEM/adk Enclosure 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2501 Sunset c^..are (ONB) (Dochnahl ) i R-121-U SA-121-88 - r DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS WHEREAS , C. Dennis Dochnahl and Bernadene Dochnahi , owners of the following real property in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington, described as Exhibit 'A' attached hereto. WHEREAS, the owners of said described property desire to impose the following restrictive covenats running with the land as to use , present and future, of the above described real property. NOW, THEREFORE, the aforesaid owners hereby establish, grant and impose restrictions and covenants running with the land C) hereinabove described with respect to the use by the undersigned, t4 their successors, heirs , and assigns as follows: CD RESTRICTIVE COVENANT 0) 0 A Site Plan Review shall be required for any future development or !,JD redevelopment of said property. CIDURATION Up These covenants shall run with the land and expire on December 31 , 2025. If at any time improvements .are installed pursuant to these covenants , the portion of the covenants pertaining to the specific installed improvements as required by the Ordinances of the City of Renton shall terminate without necessity of further documentation. Any violation or breach of these restrictive covenants may be en- forced by proper legal procedures in the Superior Court of King County by eit er the City of Renton or any property owners adjoining subjeprope ty}..who are adversely affected by said bre c el , / ,...-Z 4 4§,o, ./ - _ • C. Dennis Dochnahl \ B rnadene Dochnahl 89/06/09 #0199 l G RECD F 6.00 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) CASHSL ****6.00 ss 55. County of KING ) On this /f day of d1)/1_,a-��y- , 1989 , before me personally appeared the per who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said persons for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year ' rst above wr ' tte Notary Public in and for the/ tate '. . of Washington, residing at- R nton. LL. V _.. "l: .A, M i;r ;. 1 III hL(S UL i Ui `t:e. 1 _ �.a •&° . CMCE OFNE CCJTY` CLERK `' F NTON MUNICIPAL BLDG. 200 MILL AVE. O. REIffON, WA 98055 EXHIBIT "A" Legal Description for SUNSET SQUARE (Dochnahl) Rezone 121-88 and Site Approval 121-88 The Northwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 15, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. EXCEPT the west 7.5 feet thereof; C 0) AND EXCEPT the East 80 feet thereof; O AND EXCEPT that portion conveyed to King County for road by Deed C recorded under Auditor's File No. 5831773; UCD 0 EXCEPT all coal and minerals and the right to explore for the mine the same; OD Situate in the County of King, State of Washington Subject to: reservations, rights of record. Also known as Lot 1, KCSP 1079069 Auditor's File #8002040734. � ITO W = 7C . M 7 Jm c to tn Gm -( $' CITY OF RENTON "LL 4 FINANCE DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk June 29, 1989 Torjan Ronhovde 1048 West James #102 Kent, Washington 98032 RE: SUNSET SQUARE REZONE - R-121-88 Dear Mr. Ronhovde: The Renton City Council at its abbreviated meeting of June 26, 1989, adopted Ordinance No. 4222 changing the zoning classification of certain properties within the City of Renton from O-P to B-1. A copy of the ordinance is attached for your records. Also enclosed is a copy of the Declaration of Restrictive Covenants • recorded under King County Auditor's number 8906090199. If we can be of further assistance in this matter, please feel free to call. Yours truly, CITY OF RENTON Maxine E. Motor, CMC City Clerk cc: Planning Division-Zoning Hearing Examiner Enclosures 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2501 CITY OF RENTON • FINANCE DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Y � Y Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk June 29, 1989 Mr. Dennis Dochnal Sunset Square Management 2006 Redmond Avenue N.E. Renton, Washington 98056 RE: SUNSET SQUARE REZONE - R-121-88 Dear Mr. Dochnal: The Renton City Council at its abbreviated meeting of June 26, 1989, adopted Ordinance No. 4222 changing the zoning classification of certain properties within the City of Renton from O-P to B-I. A copy of the ordinance is attached for your records. Also enclosed is a copy of the Declaration of Restrictive Covenants recorded under King County Auditor's number 8906090199. If we can be of further assistance in this matter, please feel free to call. Yours truly, CITY OF RENTON Maxine E. Motor, CMC City Clerk cc: Planning Division-Zoning Hearing Examiner Enclosures • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2501 Department of Asses; its ATTENTION: Abstract-Section - Al Martin F 709F King County Administration Building O R4� Seattle, WA 98104 ), OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK ti I, Q PUBLIC RECORDS DIVISION U �$ ® z The attached material comes to you in 090 Go response to your recent request. oggr6-o SEp1ti ' Ordinance No. 4222 June 29, 1989 CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVENUE SOUTH ✓ ee vl7`7 RENTON, WA 98055 ' PHONE (206) 235-2500 . Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk • !s: • 'ai ;a• • • f • •..> .a i• • • • TI• �y j • t' 1'... •!1 .;is J. ''I .;lra•::.:. • •• 'r ... ti^` tlii • 1'. ' 1 ,1.�a 1'. .. ,t;' ', • - -- Fo-.ug'z By City Clerk's Office Only A. I . # AGENDA ITEM RENTON CITY COUNCIL MEETING SUBMITTING Dept./Div./Bd./Comm. Hearing Examiner For Agenda Of June 12, 1989 (Meeting Date) Staff Contact Fred J.. Kaufman (Name) Agenda Status: SUNSET SQUARE (ONB) (Dochnahl) • SUBJECT: R, SA-121-88 - Rezone of 1 .41 acres from Consent 0-P to B-I for addition to existing Old National Public Hearing Correspondence Bank structure. Site Plan has been approved, Ordinance/Resolution with conditions. Old Business Exhibits: (Legal Descr. , Maps, Etc.)Attach New Business Study Session A. Yellow File , Other B. • C. Approval : Legal Dept. Yes No N/A COUNCIL ACTION RECOMMENDED: Finance Dept. Yes No. N/A Refer to Ways and Means Committee Other Clearance FISCAL IMPACT: Expenditure Required $ Amount $ Appropriation- $ Budgeted Transfer Required SUMMARY (Background information, prior action and effect of implementation) (Attach additional pages if necessary.) The Site Plan for this proposal has been approved, with conditions shown in the Examiner's Decision of April 14, 1989. The rezone is recommended for approval subject to the applicant filing restrictive covenants requiring-- Site Plan review of any development or future redevelopment on the subject site. PARTIES OF RECORD/INTERESTED CITIZENS TO BE CONTACTED: Yellow File SUBMIT THIS COPY TO CITY CLERK BY NOON ON THURSDAY WITH DOCUMENTATION. • CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 4222 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM 0-P (Office Park) TO B-1 (Business District) - SUNSET SQUARE (ONB) (DOCHNAHL) , FILE No. R- 121-88 WHEREAS, under Chapter 7, Title IV (Building Regulations) of Ordinance No. 1628 known as the "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, " as amended, and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the property hereinbelow described has heretofore been zoned as 0-P (Office Park) ; and WHEREAS, a proper petition for change of zone classification of said property has been filed with the Planning Division on or about December 15, 1988, which petition was duly referred to the hearing examiner for investigation, study, and public hearing, and a public hearing having been held thereon on or about April 11, 1989, and said matter having been duly considered by the hearing examiner, and said zoning request being in conformity with the city's comprehensive plan, as amended, and the city council having duly considered all matters relevant thereto, and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto; ' NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I: The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby rezoned to B-1 (Business District) , as hereinbelow specified, subject to the findings, conclusions, and decision of the hearing examiner dated April 14, 1989, and subject further to 1 ORDINANCE NO. 422, restrictive covenants filed under King County Auditor's File No. 8906090199, and which said covenants are hereby incorporated and made a part hereof as if fully set forth, the Planning Manager is hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to evidence said rezoning, to-wit: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein. (Said property, approximately 1 .41 acres, being located at the southwest corner of N.E. Fourth Street and Bremerton Avenue N.E. ) SECTION II: This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and five days after its publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 26th day of June , 1989 . ;7,_ .e__,ze6x2 .1-- i-t Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 26th day of June. , 1989 . (-4 AAK Earl Clymer, Mar Approv s to form: Lawrence J. Wa n, City Attorney Date of Publication: June 30, 1989 ORD. 95: 6-13-89 :as. 2 Sunset" Square (ONB) (Dochnahl) R-121-88 •-SA-121-88 ORDIY:- -NE NO. 4222 oa• cn U ' DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS rn 0 to WHEREAS, C. Dennis Dochnahl and Bernadene Dochnahl , owners o of the following real property in the City of Renton, County of coo King, State of Washington, described as Exhibit 'A' attached hereto. WHEREAS, the owners of said described property desire to impose the following restrictive covenats running with the land as to use, present and future, of the above described real property. NOW, THEREFORE, the. aforesaid owners' hereby establish, grant and impose restrictions and covenants running with the land hereinabove described with respect to the use by the undersigned, their successors, heirs, and assigns as follows: RESTRICTIVE COVENANT A Site Plan Review shall be required for any future development or redevelopment of said property. DURATION These covenants shall run with the land and expire on December 31 , 2025. If at any time improvements are installed pursuant to these covenants, the portion of the covenants pertaining to the specific installed improvements as required by the Ordinances of the City of Renton shall terminate without necessity of further documentation. Any violation or breach of these restrictive covenants may be en- forced by proper legal procedures in the Superior Court of King County by eit er the City of Renton or any property owners adjoining subj prope tylwho are adversely affected by said bre e/i c jiAidt-e, 611(26e.(2, C. Dennis Dochnahl B rnadene Dochnahl STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss County of KING ) On this //' day of 4La.44, , 1989 , before me personally appeared the persons who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said persons for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year rst aboveiwr tten: ,.." /1-4...h..•t. 4-1----,12..---ON, • ; .<1;...e....LA._.e....- Notary Public in and for the. tate ' of Washington, residing at R nton. • `1:.1� . •• , 13;Iti LL I Ui (fF;rr Or ' . 0 CLERK F_NiMUNICIPAL BLDG. 200 MIL! AYE. SO. RENTON, WA 93055 • ORDINANCE NO. 4222 w I r , U . 00 UD CD EXHIBIT "A" o LO 0 UD Legal Description for SUNSET SQUARE (Dochnahl) C° Rezone 121-88 and Site Approval 121-88 The Northwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 15, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. EXCEPT the west 7.5 feet thereof; AND EXCEPT the East 80 feet thereof; AND EXCEPT that portion conveyed to King County for road by Deed recorded under Auditor's File No. 5831773 ; EXCEPT all coal and minerals and the right to explore for the mine the same; Situate in the County of King, State of Washington ' Subject to: reservations, rights of record. Also. known as Lot 1, KCSP 1079069 Auditor's File #8002040734. N CV • z .. - fr-1 N I 1: 1 �G. d q.1 Pi • o A$� '' It 7C ^ AG in �N �. r 9 .Zz . g 6.../•-t• 1-./ 25.5.Z 1 e f ��..�..- �� i +sl7/ ssa Z> 1./S87/6C a 4587 �� 4SBo/361' ' 4653/288-8' - I • 'c �` - / , lEsr. /BB�J y qt.,. b° SEC 1 • 28TH. ST. 4CF.i. :•tits`.(32' WG w 1 jM� SB9oG03'-/2" r ti ^6s3/779-*2' fs•f-/88L o M� �, s�o�z4f48 v, SE 128 TH.ST' '.:`:..".. ....• .ij IR?-110- —-- — tsss/4 \. - - - aG�c-/29/- - - ••-1.--a . 4 6/ , .. .` ro ic30/so g n N e+ 80.t/ - /87.� -C.632233 4S38/C5 ••n, /S3•ais S• So 44'o0J il--_..-F-'+cae•/489--- ' 4$9'.T/`200 1 /e. 4�a t Jo I /on I So - i76..q 3 1 8' 31,„t So I a' - I `N C KCSP•1079069 b r oa2o 1. 3�5� ✓► fz • _.. e lay 4 , . titi 42 M ./20 • ,�: p39 0 "i • ei- VI 4 N ' s�� co tNi o _ 03© __ i4 L a T Z - - • . - .Ii • C.rt7 • •• M v lei �7J.t,i 6 ^\ f 9k \ 31 o 2/2.G3 �! 4. � OASN N o¢e. 39+G O _ B /oo So /S3.Szl S.-Lr..f/y%z'.i,Y.F=oF.*:01 .,d.�✓:4. 9.- I - . . 4 _ • I _ 207.o42 I-.. ,.1 op L N / 3oa" sa/ c2'7"aqz p • • • ' '� i /�J ro'�—� 1.15 AN c1,1 fl L [or 2� LOT 3 `,� - 3o �� 39 S. 9 I /O 54 c.ii.\i Pc-. �I h LOT • p/¢Z�a y I y sa Rom' .� y, • 40. 33/7.o2P I �3/G.83� "r. I • . /s.9.-9® /.S.l.82 30 3"82'7 O Gz7. C.S3 • . z,�oz ,1 i N. ce- 0,_�4 Is/ 39• ^01 2/1. I s 5.f • - i . Sunset Square (ONB) (Dochnahl) R-121-8E[ A-121-88 00 Ln DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS rn WHEREAS, C. Dennis Dochnahl and Bernadene Dochnahl , owners of the following real property in the City of Renton, County of cO LO King, State of Washington, described as Exhibit 'A' attached hereto. WHEREAS, the owners of said described property desire to impose the following restrictive covenats running with the land as to use, present and future, of the above described real property. NOW, THEREFORE, the aforesaid owners hereby establish, grant and impose restrictions and covenants running with the land hereinabove described with respect to the use by the undersigned, their successors, heirs, and assigns as follows: RESTRICTIVE COVENANT A Site Plan Review shall be required for any future development or redevelopment of said property. DURATION These covenants shall run with the land and expire on December 31 , 2025 . If at any time improvements are installed pursuant to these covenants, the portion of the covenants pertaining to the specific installed improvements as required by the Ordinances of the..City .of Renton shall terminate without necessity of further documentation. Any violation or breach of these restrictive covenants may be en-. forced by proper legal procedures in .•the Superior Court of King County by eit r the City of •Renton or any property owners adjoining sulj prope tyl.,who are adversely affected by said bre C. Dennis Dochnahl B rnadene Dochnahl STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss County of KING On this If - day of . 4L. , 1989 , before me personally appeared the persohs who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said persons for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year • rst above iwr, tter .' , , f ,/ • ,;:ez.• Notary Public in and for the; tate • ' . of Washington, residing at R nton. C• iCir- OF i CITY CLERK FENTON MUNIC;PAL BLDG. 200 MILL AV E SO. RENTON, WA 98055 A 00 UD CD EXHIBIT "A" cn o (0 0 UD UD Legal Description for SUNSET SQUARE (Dochnahl) Rezone 121-88 and Site Approval 121-88 The Northwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest- 1/4 of Section 15, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. EXCEPT the west 7.5 feet thereof; AND EXCEPT the East 80 feet thereof; AND EXCEPT that portion conveyed to King County for road by Deed recorded under Auditor's File No. 5831773 ; EXCEPT all coal and minerals and the right to explore for the mine the same; Situate in the County of King, State of Washington Subject to: reservations, rights of record. Also known as Lot 1, KCSP 1079069 Auditor's File #8002040734. vp - ,4t1cut Nemv TO: Gi b PLEASE CALL FROM: 47 0 FOR YOUR INFORMATION FOR ACTION DATE: 6 , /,�_ 9 TIME: 0 FOR APPROVAL f rri' i ATUR NRE: C ,G /L � Ql , u 1 iR ,A • P� M C N I ON PHONE 0 ,jEQUE 0# ' , i!.DMI •" URN ©. ,,READ AND ROUTE TO FILES ,OMMENTS : ey- CI AT'fi A tli-11AT-E.ROA L & RETURN tee42,&-Crid, eel-V-(4.40aQ 666-1- WtZ4... /r,(1V ( " Ea .Xt F9o(vo9o/97 ' ,(,,. l • SPEED LETTER • TO: -g:A/OVEzi7AI DATE: /.../(//V /2 R9 PROJECT: :551 /e/---Og SUBJECT: 7"ag /4/ I • 1_,.• ' JUN 1 1989 I i/ il IIPtreCe‘ I (04 /9.,e (SignedLI • ,••;, ,•11; • ';\ '%,;• :*;;• .• • •• :•• • G ' • • 1 • DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS WHEREAS , C. Dennis Dochnahl and Bernadene Dochnahl , owners of the following real property in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington, described as Exhibit 'A' attached hereto. WHEREAS, the owners of said described property desire to impose the following restrictive covenats running with the land as to use, present and future, of the above described real property. NOW, THEREFORE, the aforesaid owners hereby establish, grant and impose restrictions and covenants running with the land hereinabove described with respect to the use by the undersigned, their successors , heirs , and assigns as follows : RESTRICTIVE COVENANT A Site Plan Review shall be required for any future development or redevelopment of said property. DURATION These covenants shall run with the land and expire on December 31 , 2025 . If at any time improvements are installed pursuant to these covenants , the portion of the covenants pertaining to the specific installed improvements as required by the Ordinances of the City of Renton shall terminate without necessity of further documentation. Any violation or breach of these restrictive covenants may be en- forced by proper legal procedures in the Superior Court of King County by either the City of Renton or any property owners adjoining subject property who are adversely affected by said breach. It i G` % 1. �,/'.j, i ;: 1` ( C. Dennis Dochnahl Bernadene Dochnahl STATE OF WASHINGTON ) . ss County of KING ) if 1 On this %1ti, day of `, �'�%_titerr , 1989 , before me personally appeared the perso,tis who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said persons for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and yearT f` rst above (wr .tten. l� • Notary Public in and for the; tate of Washington, residing at R nton. I EXHIBIT "A" Legal Description for SUNSET SQUARE (Dochnahl) Rezone 121-88 and Site Approval 121-88 The Northwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 ,of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 15, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. EXCEPT the west 7 .5 feet thereof; AND EXCEPT the East 80 feet thereof; AND EXCEPT that portion conveyed to King County for road by Deed recorded under Auditor' s File No. 5831773 ; EXCEPT all coal and minerals and the right to explore for the mine the same; Situate in the County of King, State of Washington Subject to: reservations, rights of record. Also known as Lot 1, KCSP 1079069 Auditor' s File #8002040734 . CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER Earl Clymer, Mayor • Fred J. Kaufman • MEMORANDUM May 22, 1989 TO: Lenora Blauman, Senior Planner FROM: Fred J. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner RE: Legal Description for Sunset Square - R, SA-121-88 This office has received information that the legal description for the above matter is incomplete. You may contact Arneta in the Engineering Division (ext. 2631) to determine the extent of the inaccuracy. Once the legal is correct this office will continue to process the application. Thanks. • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2593 i R SPEED LETTER TO: /4/45Z) DATE: /S,* 4 /' / 9 .55 /iie/A/@ PROJECT: /2/— 8 Eaa 6-G46 /,1/CD4 f G 6 6" O' '2) /<'C /-16'/?T ,1 , T ,6 C D ,CF-CCCA T/did/. 6 46 el /OAP 4PP 4,e Td .23b-- 4it./ sO fry E,4S T' ( /v6 'o• Ng- iv/ r .vecieeRT� Nor sovrii \\\\-W-a•SC'elj.\(": „tat' 4f3 &Ism° Atiseo S�R/Vt Z4 / ( gned) EMORANDUM '� To ARNIE HENNINGER Date May 11 , 1989 From HEARING EXAMINER' S OFFICE J Subject Verification of Legal Description - (SUNSET SQUARE) Rezone & SA-121-88 Arnie: Would you please check this legal description for us as soon as possible so we may attach to Covenants that will be presented to the City Council . Thanks.. dotty . ') • Sunset Sq.' (Dochnahl ) Rezone 121-88 SA-121-88 EXHIBIT 'A' srrm=m wn. The Northwest of the Northwest 4 of the Northeast 4 of the Northwest h of Section 15, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. EXCEPT the West 7.5 feet thereof; AND EXCEPT the East 80 feet thereof; AND EXCEPT that portion conveyed to King County for road by Deed recorded under Auditor's Pile No. 5831773; EXCEPT all coal and minerals and the right to explore for the mine the same; Situate in the County of King, State of Washington. Subject to: reservations, rights of record DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS WHEREAS , C. Dennis Dochnahl and Bernadene Dochnahl , owners of the following real property in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington, described as Exhibit 'A ' attached hereto. WHEREAS , the owners of said described property desire to impose the following restrictive covenats running with the land as to use, present and future, of the above described real property. NOW, THEREFORE, the aforesaid owners hereby establish, grant and impose restrictions and covenants running with the land hereinabove described with respect to the use by the undersigned, their successors , heirs , and assigns as follows : RESTRICTIVE COVENANT A Site Plan Review shall be required for any future development or redevelopment of said property. DURATION These covenants shall run with the land and expire on December 31 , 2025 . If at any time improvements are installed pursuant to these covenants , the portion of the covenants pertaining to the specific installed improvements as required by the Ordinances of the City of Renton shall terminate without necessity of further documentation. Any violation or breach of these restrictive covenants may be en- forced by proper legal procedures in the Superior Court of King County by either the City of Renton or any property owners adjoining subject property who are adversely affected by said breach. C. Dennis Dochnahl Bernadene Dochnahl STATE OF WASHINGTON ) : ss County of KING71 ) On this . r - day of %'/;•La.. , 1989 , before me personally appeared the persofis who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said persons for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year if "rst above lwrtten:, Notary Public in and for the,; tate of Washington, residing at R nton. • • (yF R F,� `,.._ • . ; ar OIJDT' ICE n -p o 09 <P `i L •tto SEPTE� • �'j(.;' City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner will hold a . HEARING . :,. . :,, I) II B .LIC in CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS , . CITY HALL - ON APRIL 11, 1989 BEGINNING AT 9 : °A.M. P.M. ECF-121-88 R-121-88 SA-121-88 =®iIcERr NG: (OLD NATIONAL BANK) • i APPLICANT SEEKS TO: 1) REZONE 1. 41 ACRE SITE FROM OP (OFFICE PARK) TO B-1 (COMMERCIAL) ; 2) OBTAIN SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT AN APPROXIMATELY 5, 200 SQ. FT. ADDITION TO THE EXISTING OLD NATIONAL BANK BUILDING. '''‘ .1- 1'1 01.41';i:111;. I--- —.1 2,-- 11:-. . ..IC ..' •• :... s' I 1 �, ':� 1'; • ` 1) ►\-- ''.;:.•):;,..�.�� � ,I Llill: • .: '(1 ( . • : . : 1 .I' ±� l"I•I'i.li 'i I 1......II I :. .. I • — i 4. 1 ' ilI : a, - .: II I I.I It,ii t , '' •Gi -I i ' ' , I,, -'( +0,1,..' I I G1 •, .l. . .:I!.' I il I I • ' , ' `U1 la CAI. tic.-�ms1I I 11'1 YI _, J''. _.i � I I--1-'— •-1—,_ _ -1 I 1 }111')• i ` ,..� _: ��t::t ' � , I . , :::.':' • . .:.\ 11, • • i1i III _ :f.iIlL._ I . _I.I'_ - '. �,.,._�_,1 ii-._• II..I,_l_ • _, f 11.1'•'. 9 !; "'if 101111111 ry11111 II /11 :' 1 .r•" ,•y i,... 0•. ), ;�,; I ill 1 'l11.. It-1 —III- •:•, . J , 3ENERALL • L C... .' TIO N AN !A /O _• - D O E 9 • PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF N.E. FOURTH STREET AND BREMERTON AVENUE N.E. ' • • FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON • BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-25!0 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION i. h .I.L L.ki -- ; �� a� (1 ;,. ; R-1 '- T .sue '. 1-. . f 1 y Ir, ,� R ~ 2 1I i ,rT^' � t�,� _1., - 1J �I N-il'1T _ •. • li9 /'i! '.(1r ? i' , 1 ffi-Cn-,.iAi\:.1\\ko1V':%_i;.Y'.:.'-..-;'_:"!114:i '..-,l"• C:..1',:'!'i l l `•..1:('(t:)")1".:-.1 2 II ;([ rl \i . . R ��.. 1I ,.I1 l.I1 l_.4 , 1 ► ( 1 I ' I ., G I N _.. .. ,.. 1. _. I _ . , f i , l'=d A-4 ._____. . . .. .. 1 1 I 5 -1 1 Rimi - 1 B. r.-- 1 r i j H . . 1 \-- f ,) 1 I . 1 I 1 I r , �T . ! 6 . r a .I� —T1T' I � 5 l G _— _ .�14 j 1 1 --- G-1 1"-3 ; � ...I0 1 f -3 G 1 1 -` III; _ - I - I r--- 4. f ______ ---- i- ....�.u -- J • • 1 I T ,; ;R• 2° rpup-- 05'3--t36 . • __L_ , . •7,`: Q. • OLD NATIONAL BANK ' SA-121-88 ,R, ECF j 1 APPLICANT DNA/RONHOVDE ARCHITECTS TOTAL AREA 1.41 ACRE • PRINCIPAL ACCESS N.E . 4th STREET & BREMERTON AVE N.E. • EXISTING ZONING OP EXISTING USE OFFICE PROPOSED USE OFFICE ONLY - NO RETAIL COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN • (COMMENTS PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF N.E. FOURTH • STREET AND BREMERTON AVENUE N.E.) - 1 ti• i • AG` ' • C n , �$• loo W '°� q�155p t9Sb10 3���0� 1 70 0 ?5pG 5 S, 1� p� i, • 0 9 .z2 �� T. S, =... ► —. s.er� a+R I .. s 238 2I Sp Z j - Is87/6ltB 4587 ®e s�•iss s e 4S6o/36r • �599/ Sl6 9-9 e"'` i` - /7< ea,. /68et> _ '� �� , h S E.�" 128TH. ST- q�- oeFs e�s�,j rS�S�U�" JCS W s.ae-oa-re w. \ ._ _ SiG y�; - se3o4¢s-/z ' �sear77�-¢z• fst"i886 oM 87OGZ4I488. v� • -� SE 128T :S •; rises/Zcd \z• 4•G,..:429/7 - •• -4-. .. - / . ... "'• 4.0 4-5-5-8/cs• 4s�a/ss4 M 4s o /a H K `'._ :.. 8a•d/ - k �e7.9S y! 63�2o23d `oe �o iS�•z�,s .0 zp r3o �7 or� _ .,.�M_�lde`/«9 _ _. . .. ;4S9S/2ao A I ie.• • •• • r7<.4 3 1. '°° 8!1 : 3 ! 30Fr 1 ... • oN • ; ii AO •3( 5? �1 - \I • C KCSP-1079069 7, 0• . �.� 4• 4 �,ti� 2 M ,�2� �,� -- AU L o T z °, .0 a T N _ _ o v,�r 1 _ L ,moo 1 A .. , ril ,. 47 0, IP' ;),, • \t's - . - 0 394G O - ' 150' . , • .:5; .. 207. O¢Z _ 100z r 2. a 3 8pR6N /oo SO /S .s2/ •S•.f.✓.•0A 4/ %•rFN•E'-+oF.t!s✓.f-, .A✓,.4 . , , , - .. / • :.„--.-:.. • •. .....‘.'::::-..-..._ 4.2.7.c#7.1- . i .o a .. . . - G ';.i}^• �aY ' - a -.. _ . • • • � 3 J D T •. L o. 3 '�rr 3 o - i�. 3•� 9 - G �l _ R 1 N � 0 1• • !.I`a t - /OS. 9 4 ,` I • _ • - • - •I1 i - .. .. .. • ;:f= .rlii.;•pint,,t!.}'�. _ - . f 0 • ram' ; '_ `: '' LOTit) 1 59 � `•.• r •8 > -r ,Q, /S•9. 9 ' /39.82 3D 3. 82 7 3 G27. 4S3 MEMORANDUM - To ARNIE HENNINGER Date May 11 , 1989 From HEARING EXAMINER' S OFFICE Subject Verification of Legal Description - (SUNSET SQUARE) Rezone & SA-121-88 Arnie: Would you please check this legal description for us as soon as possible so we may attach to Covenants that will be presented to the City Council . Thanks . Al,Do .' Y foG \c th t CITY OF RENTON u;, hal '`''` HEARING EXAMINER Earl Clymer, Mayor • Fred J. Kaufman May 3, 1989 ' Denny Dochnahl 2006 Redmon d Avenue NE Renton, WA 98056 RE: Sunset Square Management/Ronhovde Architects File No. Site Approval and Rezone #121-88 Dear Mr. Dochnahl: The Examiner's Report and Recommendation regarding the referenced request has not been appealed within the time period established by ordinance. Therefore, this matter is being submitted to the City Clerk this date for transmittal to the City Council for review. Restrictive covenants requiring Site Plan review for any development or redevelopment of the subject site should be prepared and forwarded to the City Clerk's Office for filing with King County. You will be notified of all action taken by the City Council upon approval of the request. Please feel free to contact this office if further assistance or information is required. Sincerely, 7412ee 9, FRED J. KAUFMAN HEARING EXAMINER FJK:dk cc: City Clerk Building Division Planning Division 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2593 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )ss. County, of King ) DOTTY KLINGMAN , being first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and states: That on the 14th day of April , 1989 - affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this /e day of (mot f ', 1989 No ary P i in a d for the State of Washington, residing 11 , therein. Application, Petition, or Case #; SA- R-1.21-88 - S SET SQUARE MANAGEMENT (The minutes contain a list of the parties of record.) April 14, 1989 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION APPLICANT: SUNSET SQUARE MANAGEMENT/RONHOVDE ARCHITECTS File No: SA, R-121-88 LOCATION: N.E. Fourth Street and Bremerton Ave. N.E. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Rezone 1.41 acres from O-P to B-1 and Site Plan approval for a building addition of approximately 5,200 square ft. to an already existing structure on the site (ONB Bank). SUMMARY OF ACTION: Planning Division Recommendation: Approval with conditions. PLANNING DIVISION REPORT: The Planning Division Report was received by the Examiner on April 11, 1989 PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Division Report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES The hearing was opened on April 11, 1989 at 9:00 A.M. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit #1 - Yellow File containing application, proof of posting and publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit #2 - Vicinity Map Exhibit #3 - Site Plan Exhibit #4 - Elevation Plan Exhibit #5 - Landscape Plan Exhibit #6 - By Reference: Annexation Map Lenora Blauman, Senior Planner, opened the hearing with a review of the proposal before the Hearing Examiner and interested members in the audience. In her review she described the proposal as 1.41 acres of property currently located in a O-P zone. The applicant wishes to rezone this site to B-1 to facilitate a 5200 sq. ft. addition to an already existing Old National Bank structure. This site is located at Bremerton and N.E. 4th which is near the eastern boundary of the city; access will be off N.E: 4th from the proposed joint driveway and off Bremerton which is the existing access. A review was given of the surrounding zoning and uses in the area and it was pointed out that this development already has in place plans to landscape over and above that landscaping which is necessary to mitigate a commercial development; utilities are currently available to the site, storm water drainage flows into the Maplewood Creek; and this new plan is to add an office development to an already existing bank on the site to further serve the community, as well as present employment opportunities for local residents. This thought is considered desirable for several reasons, one of which is to reduce traffic in that particular roadway corridor. Ms. Blauman noted for the record that this addition could have been accomplished in the O-P zone but due to the large setbacks necessary in that zone the applicant felt a B-1 zone would best suit his plan and better relate to surrounding uses. The ERC reviewed this proposal and Planner Blauman reviewed the mitigating conditions set forth by that body. The conditions require the applicant to develop a landscaping plan to buffer light and glare from neighboring properties; submit a traffic mitigation plan to cover a shared access to N.E. 4th Sunset Square Management/Ro ..:;;ode Architects SA, R-121-88 April 14,, 1989 Page 2 Street, signage and striping of the entrance and exit of N.E. 4th Street designating right-in/right-out turns, pedestrian linkage from the bank to the parking area and public right-of-way. The applicant will have to bond for a share of future traffic mitigation measures and was asked to submit plans to mitigate impacts from the site which include erosion control, wheel-washing of construction vehicles, watering down of the site during construction, haul routes and hours of operation to be approved by staff, and a bond to ensure street clean-up. Continuing, Ms. Blauman reviewed the criteria for the rezone portion of this application stating the site was not considered for rezone when the last area land use analysis and zoning was accomplished; this property was zoned O-P at the time of its annexation in 1984; the property is considered to be classified for the current use; policies in the Northeast Renton Plan support this rezone; surrounding properties developed with commercial uses and restrictive covenants could be used to ensure any future development will be compatible with the goal of no strip commercial development. The northeast section of the city is going through a rapid change and the city is trying to upgrade city services in this area due to utilities nearing their capacity. A study of utility capacities has been authorized by the City Council for this area. It is felt the rezone request is timely and the proposal is looked upon as an in-fill project. Reviewing the Site Plan proposal Ms. Blauman stated staff supports the plan and feels its architecture is a nice addition to, and is compatible with the existing bank and surrounding neighborhood; the plan meets height, setback, landscape and parking requirements. The proposed landscaping and building are to be located well back on the site to eliminate light and glare concerns for surrounding properties; drive-through banking services will only be for limited hours; the building is well-lighted for security and safety purposes; signage and added pedestrian linkages have been designed to work efficiently with the rest of the site. The pedestrian linkage is recommended to be no less than 48 inches in width; it is believed this development will not impact area-wide property values; it is anticipated there will be approximately 149 new daily vehicle trips generated. It is believed construction noise can be buffered by set hours of construction as well as landscaping; there will be no neighborhood deterioration or blight as it is felt this is an attractive, well-landscaped proposal that seems to have addressed any concerns expressed by staff. With the above information Ms. Blauman requested the rezone request receive a favorable recommendation of approval to the City Council and asked that the Hearing Examiner approve the Site Plan with conditions suggested by staff. The Examiner called for testimony on behalf of this proposal from the applicant or their representative, and responding was Denny Dochnahl, 2006 Redmond Avenue, Renton 98056. Mr. Dochnahl stated when he first developed the bank it was located in King County; this addition was proposed at that time as a future addition - so the site and storm retention and other amenities have been ready and in place to facilitate this proposed addition. He said a dry sewer line is already in place which goes west along NE 4th, landscaping was originally put in place to mitigate light and noise; at the time of annexation he said he didn't realize the O-P zoning required such huge setbacks and he does not feel at this time a 3 or 4 story building (as permitted in the O-P zone) is appropriate and requested the B-1 zoning to make this addition more compatible and reflect an attractive addition to the community. Upon questioning Mr. Dochnahl clarified that at the present time there is a right turn only exit driveway off the bank property which is located about 20 ft. to the west of the newly proposed joint access driveway. There is no problem providing a joint access as the adjoining property owner had signed an agreement at the time of the annexation. This agreement is already signed and in place. There was no one else in attendance to object to or raise questions regarding this proposal, and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 9:45 A.M. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicant, Sunset Square Management/Ronhovde Architects, filed requests for approval of a reclassification'of approximately 1.41 acres of property and for approval of a site plan for a bank expansion. 2. The yellow file containing the staff report, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record'as Exhibit #1. 3. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the City's responsible official, issued a Declaration of Non-Significance (DNS) for the subject proposal. 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. 5. There was no opposition from the public regarding the subject proposal. Sunset Square Management/Ro1A.0 rde Architects SA, R-121-88 April 144 1989 Page 3 6. The subject site is located on the southeast corner of N.E. 4th Street and Bremerton Avenue N.E. The site lies on the south side of 4th, a few parcels west of Duvall Avenue N.E. 7. The subject site was annexed into the city with the adoption of Ordinance 3946, enacted in October, 1985. The site was initially zoned O-P (Office Park) when it was annexed. The site retains the O-P zoning. 8. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of both commercial and multiple family uses, but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the plan. 9. The area contains a variety of uses including commercial uses along the N.E. 4th corridor, single family uses south and west of the site and apartment uses north of the site. 10. The area is represented by,a variety of zoning districts. The O-P district containing the subject site contains approximately 4 lots, and runs only one shallow tier of lots deep. Small isolated one lot B-1 (Business/Commercial) district parcels are located immediately north, northeast and southeast of the site. A larger B-1 district is located at the commercial node at Union and N.E. 4th Street. An R-3 (Medium Density Multiple Family) district is located northwest of the site and a large General (Single Family; Lot size - 35,000 sq. ft.) district is located both north and south of 4th. 11. The subject site is approximately 213 feet wide (N.E. 4th frontage) by approximately 288 feet deep (Bremerton frontage). The site is relatively level. 12. The O-P zone requires a setback of the lesser of 60 feet, or 20 percent of lot depth. That would require a setback of approximately 56 feet from N.E. 4th and approximately 42 feet from Bremerton. 13. The B-1 zone requires a minimum 10 foot setback which increases as building height increases. 14. The applicant proposes constructing a 5,200 square foot addition to an existing 4,070 square foot bank building. The applicant proposes using the addition to house banking offices. 15. The addition is intended to match the existing building's height and design characteristics. The building will be approximately 18 feet tall with some ornamental details extending slightly higher. 16. The building will be finished with a brick veneer, cedar trim, and aluminum store-front doors and windows. 17. The existing bank has drive-up windows served by two driveways along Bremerton and a driveway along 4th. Staff has recommended that the driveway along 4th be consolidated with the driveway to the adjacent easterly property. The applicant has agreed to the consolidation. 18. The site is served by city utilities. The sewer line serving the site is at capacity, with little capability to handle additional sewage. The city is reviewing what additional capacity remains. The limitations, while important in many respects, are not anticipated to affect the subject proposal since office uses generate less sewage than some other potential uses such as residential or restaurant uses. 19. The site is already landscaped although some of it has suffered in the past droughts. Supplementary landscaping is proposed around the perimeter of the site and along the outside of the new addition. 20. Staff is currently reviewing the traffic capacity of the N.E. 4th/3rd corridor and determined through SEPA review that the subject proposal can be accommodated. The project is expected to generate an additional 149 vehicle trips per day. Staff and the applicant anticipate some employees will use mass transit. CONCLUSIONS REZONE 1. The proponent of a rezone must demonstrate that the request is in the public interest, that it will not impair the public health, safety and welfare and in addition, complies with at least one of the criteria found in Section 4-3010, which provides in part that: • Sunset Square Management/Ro' ;; `rde Architects SA, R-121-88 April 14,, 1989 Page 4 a. The subject site has not been considered in a previous area-wide rezone or land use analysis; or b. The subject site is potentially designated for the new classification per the Comprehensive Plan; or c. There has been a material and substantial change in the area in which the subject site is located since the last rezoning of the property or area. The requested classification is warranted. 2. While the site was recently annexed into the city, there wasn't an extensive analysis conducted at that time to determine the appropriate zoning for the subject site. The application of the large setbacks required by the O-P zone to the relatively small lots found on the south side of 4th exacts a large portion of property leaving little option but upward expansion. Taller buildings in this vicinity would be out of scale with adjacent development, and particularly where the applicant proposes an addition - the character of the existing building defines the character of new development. 3. The Comprehensive Plan generally designates the subject site for commercial, rather than office park uses. Given the surrounding uses and the low-rise nature of those uses, the Comprehensive Plan's designation of commercial would be better matched by reclassification of the site to B-1. 4. A number of developments both private and public have occurred within the N.E. 4th corridor over the last five years, although not all of them have occurred subsequent to the annexation of the site. Most of that development has been limited in scale to one story, although some of the apartment complexes have attained a three-story height. 5. The main concern, although it may not be as important to the subject proposal as to some, is the fact that the sewers in this area of the Highlands have reached capacity. The limited, office oriented nature of the subject rezone and the fact that development potential or density is generally unchanged by the requested change from O-P to B-1, is a mitigating factor. This sewer limitation may have an unanticipated impact on other developments along this corridor. Particularly affected would be residential, specifically multiple family residential uses which have large sewer service demands. 6. Staff recommended that the site which is currently governed by restrictive covenants requiring site plan review continue to be so governed. That seems appropriate given the single family and other residential uses adjacent to or near the subject site. 7. Therefore, given the above analysis, the City Council should reclassify the subject site to B-1. SITE PLAN REVIEW 8. The Site Plan Ordinance provides a number of specific criteria for reviewing a site plan. Those criteria are generally represented in part by the following enumeration: a. Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan; b. Conformance with the Building and Zoning Codes; c. Mitigation of impacts on surrounding properties and uses; d. Mitigation of the impacts of the proposal on the subject site itself; e. Conservation of property values; f. Provision for safe and efficient vehicle and pedestrian circulation; g. Provision of adequate light and air; h. Adequacy of public services to accommodate the proposed use; The proposed use satisfies these and other particulars of the ordinance. 9. The 5,200 square foot addition to an existing commercial use is compatible with the designation of the site for commercial uses in the Comprehensive Plan. While the plan also suggests that portions of the site have potential for multiple family development, a number of factors, Sunset Square Management/Ro__ :'de Architects SA, R-121-88 April 14, 1989 Page 5 including the limited sewer capacity, militate against apartments. The small size of the lot is more important in limiting potential apartment development. 10. The proposed building will provide greater setbacks then are required in the. B-1 zone. Lot coverage just meets the standards - the site will be covered by 70 percent impermeable surface and building footprint. The approximately 20 foot high addition is well within the limits of the B-1 zone. 11. The low-rise building, landscaping, and the design features all assist in integrating the building into the existing complex and into the neighborhood. The obvious large distance across 4th, coupled with the approximately 80 foot setback from 4th, will prevent any shadow or shading affects on property to the north, across N.E. 4th. 12. The building will be finished to match the existing building with a combination of brick and cedar trim. The perimeter landscaping will be supplemented to enhance the appearance and buffer the southerly uses from the rear of the complex and from the parking located in this area. 13. The addition should not have a negative impact on property values but should increase the value of at least the subject site - and by upgrading the subject site, could encourage additional improvements along the corridor. 14. Pedestrian circulation can be improved by the addition of separate walkways, removed from the vehicular circulation patterns. With the increased development of residential uses in the area there could be'an increase in foot traffic both by employees and bank patrons. Any pedestrian amenities should be subject to the review and approval of the Planning Division. 15. Traffic circulation appears adequate and the consolidated driveway along N.E. 4th should assist in maintaining the arterial integrity of 4th. 16. Again, the setbacks observed by the use, its location on a corner lot, and the landscaping should assure that both the subject site and adjacent uses are not adversely affected in the provision of adequate light and air. 17. Finally, public services, at least at this time and for this use, are adequate to serve the subject site. 18. In addition, proposed site plans must not adversely affect area-wide property values, must provide adequate air and light, and must not cause neighborhood deterioration or blight. The proposal appears to successfully satisfy these additional criteria. RECOMMENDATION • The City Council should reclassify the subject site from O-P to B-1 subject to the following . condition: 1. Restrictive covenants requiring site plan review shall be required for any development or redevelopment of the subject site. DECISION The Site Plan is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. Any pedestrian amenities should be subject to the review and approval of the Planning Division. 2. The applicant shall comply with the conditions imposed by the ERC: ORDERED THIS 14th day of April, 1989. FRED J. KA MAN HEARING E MINER Sunset Square Management/Ra—___'/de Architects SA, R-121-88 April 14, 1989 Page 6 TRANSMITTED THIS 14th day of April, 1989 to the parties of record: Denny Dochnahl - 2006 Redmond Avenue NE Renton, Washington 98056 TRANSMITTED THIS 14th day of April, 1989 to the following: Mayor Earl Clymer Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator Ken Nyberg, Director, Community Development Members, Renton Planning Commission Lynn A. Guttmann, Public Works Director Glen Gordon, Fire Marshal Don Monaghan, Acting Engineering Supervisor Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Larry M. Springer, Planning Manager Gary Norris, Traffic Engineer Ronald Nelson, Building Director Garth Cray, Senior Engineering Specialist John Adamson, Developmental Program Coordinator Valley Daily News Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 P.M. April 28, 1989. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after'review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City.Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of $75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. • • LAND USE ELEMENT ,.... _4___-- • j: .,,...-..., L . .... ______ _...... 7- •-i !..'.,<!.1:, -- - ______ .„,___ 1. ---4- k.;:,e.;,•:. '‘.. L.-_.•.i, , ( ''.i..'•:2t•-.f.:• .-;?;:s..'',! t'.:::,..,C..,..2 ..•...•.::' .., • 2. 2.-,. .•;.,74-:,?,;•,-,,..;;;:"..,:.‘, ;,-:.. V '''''•••Art.,°;:ci_i:',..4:'.4.;:• .5.e.i'',..:.•:•:7: i;.: '-'62:',:•.s .::••••••.;••=1.:',.•,`,, rc.•F.ie.'-'• i...f, • •••••••••• Single Family - ,• Commercial L 1 I.. 1.4 ilk%.5 .,;,,,,,;..„.,, , ••„..„:,--5.:-.0t1r..-,;,.-f.,•,„...,,.. 0,,. •,,..„4,-;.:!•.•-': :••:ii•:•:i.::.•::.:::. o'w Density . -cm,.-„ , •-.- „ ,-.,•;,- ,...-•..,: -,."„.....:.-::::12,. ::::::::::::::::::::: Multi-Family Office / Office Park ..,-..-,z.,.. .,:....!;.::-.,,,....,,,....•111147,0 . '''''''''''':•""'''''•;.'reS•••:•••?-;.i•-•'P•...o.c.4, -..:K".. ..'.-...c.- ::::::::::::::•:•:•:•, • • .21,,f...:.2,• . ::-...•. 27-r....,2.,. -- - - ',••••2%.• .....'.. '..fi ?, :P.:.•':.-...D.; •••• '.. ::: :::::::::::::::: Medium Density .......c, .......• .. -...- ,.. .,•,, ::::::::::::::::::i:m ............... Public/Quasi-Public .:.:*.:::,::::.:::.::.:*,::.::.:: Multi-Family, ....... 0,:,...... IAN i 44 a _ •.. . . . . ,..... ,w ;. o _ .c. . \!.....,... :.: _ ,, • Rowel High Density Multi-Family Light Industrial...•t'.k4 •.;•:. •' MOM , . le.•?,,,i,.,k •,. . tA.... , . 4 .‘4• . • ,....- . i.:.• .• 4111 <:v;1'4:: ' ..i.si.r`i•(' Recreation • • • • • • ••• " '..e.kk :1 'ig, • • • • • • Heavy Industrial . •. ...s..., fAi . .. z . ,., op-.---4. .. ..7 -:. y;;•S; . ,r,r r:. Thigii 1 ':i.;:Ef,T:;;.e...i; Greenbelt, -_-_-_-- Manufacturing Part ,-.••••• -,..,, • •.,„. • (...-‘..%e.,!) , " / Multiple Optioi -• (,01.• . • • ilie.,• ....,•0.00. j ,. ...mil :,..- • ...-- --.1 1.00.83.08:, 1., :...: .. tog ,o, irsap-• _eiw••:‘•• 1 r q-,..,,t :• - ',..E, 1 , ..... ,- 0 0 1.• ifilig/%, • f. • N,\ • • • . :: „...,,, , , _____ /I Jig A -.......• 000000f ;$. I • • • • •A..„.....sr. iiiiiiii t.::•:-.: Wi:.iii.':':::':':':.:.•.•i 4--- :- ::.•::. • .;.. . ;Egii:0.: • '0"6"8-1:US! •,,-.. -- 000000( ry,,. L -L-_, • • • • ii.l. ,•t. .;• ::*;.:... - -:- ) ••• •••••• pf, __ i ! ....0.0. ..........0‘ - . .•••••• •••. ,,.i.„ ,... ..,: ::::.:::!iii:•:.:.iiii rrfemoqi.i• ii„,,/i4f 1 folio .0.0.0 0...0, 000000 P.•.•\..r, .:••ii FA p; , 000.0, '•••• • ,•••••-v,!. :I.**-....41 4110 1118,%.,,c,,,,,,o, • • • 4 Ao• • .. •cd .::::::::::::::las : : : • .•os :. . i :..,.. • ••••••••• •••: ''.... ,' i.lii. 1.w.-. 1 111 . .. .-•-• -• - II I To°o°o°o°o°o°o°o°1 . i N ••••••••• ••••• .., ,. ..,:i.:::::. Nth 1 • 11111,. fcr.,•( 0000000000 o • • • • • • '-,.. s- :ii:i. ,, • • a • • • • • ;:0 , :•• mni rec4,:. .0. 1 • • • • • • •• • ,...,`, '-' MOM .c,=if.f.I . .* a-ill-el-1°i .*:. ''' • ifti i V,. °0°0.1"11 /. ' .... ..• . .... > • • • • • • • .,.„ L ii-•••• 0%* r op 1 ......... . ..:.:.::::::::::::•:•:•:-::::::: 1 1- • • • • • •. • -....•' N .0.0 0 .................. .. .- • • • 6 • -..,'. . ....00 :......::::::... .•:::::::::::::•:•••Ittka I •• • • • • ''c'i ' ..:.::::::.... ...:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:10. •::.:..... • . .• • • Is • `...,.... •••• ' :::::.:.. .::: :: in44 : :::::.. • • • • • 4,1. i. I, .:°°0°8 iiirEhimidlel .•• ''. . • • • ill • •:••„;ilii Id - .;.,,,N,21.,,r1'. • • • A • ill . , .•0. 111 Ni.k, .:.:.:•:. 1 I ::::.:34ii I • • • • ‘• .• ,ligh .°.°1111iiiiiiiiiii, 011gii...A6 NIL . 1 .... .... 0. • ......... .... iltoi! •!:,•••:44:4011/ dia" vittl ................. .0••.( :•,:•::::.:•:.:.:.:.:•:•:.:.:.:::•:,.:. • • .0.00 ,,DDX.X.D::::::: :::: IRWIN k .;i N, 44siiiith ,::iii iii • •csi. • 1 44 , .00NI ..0...0.0,§ ::::::::::::::::::,,,,,,,,,,, i:]]i:: 1 ''''''A'' '!'r,,;, ! 1W11°..%._. .41 111...------• •:•:•:.a.•..••••2..- ,• ,, i .1 c. g .16.11. 4,...1•Aji ....................M . • - --N,-; . lag ',..••• fi -- •-, :-...• k 1 :ii',. .;,, ••••••• ::::•:-.....0 0'. iiiii '0'0°P.0•0•0°.°0°. :: a i::::.11111111rirgi71 "4.1)1 tr/bak'.... ::eND:::::.........:•:': 'o°o°o°oO o o o o o o°o°o°o°o°o°o°o°o°8 ' iillIVI/111111 a:::.i.r.-..;.i.: :i*i:i:ii.ii.:i.ii ::Ep. ‘.4..,......•7 .000000000.0000000000 , ..........", ,. ....... ..::•::•::::::::::::::::::1:1: 0.0000000,...0.0.0cpoum • .*•::•:,•::::::::::.,i.,..:.,4 • 1 IIIIPIF .44 '141;1".4.'"...''' ...::AiiiMiai 0cF/0•?0°0°.°0°A°09.°0°( 'I ... ,07'. .:.i:Mi:::.:.*iftiMgi.iiigii::iii::•:•:.. - • gi I jor .,.....;;,..,„..;!''..-.!,, .:ii!::iii::::ii:iiiiiiiiiiii:i.:::: V00000000 0_0_0_0_0_0_0_0_0_0( •::::::.: •00 '.••••'.• . ;„ . • .:..:: 1 Piii4;hee'' . .:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::*i. avocTou.°0°.0-0-d-Tovo-0-0-0 .0 8 .. 11 '1141.1 401 ,,.. 0 .. ...::::::::::::::::::::::::.: ,00.0000.0.0000.00... 1........,... L ••.. •••,0, I. - . 00 .00. 000.00. .....„ . .,t Jill ;.!.,,,,...,...,.....7 • yr ok., m".9,,... .. :.:i.:. ... f10°00°0°0°00°0°0°0°0°00°0°0°0°0°0°0%°0cLy i: ::•:g....:•:•:... ...• : _____ 0•11 0000 iZat 't y pc-, .,,.% 1. ?„ 000T6. .., ::iii:iuma ..- ifovocno,§69, , ,4(.,_:.:. :: 11111Y .%,,..'('-„,1-c4 ;....t .tc,„.(-'... ''',. i 0.0.0.0 ',. •iiiii:i:i*i::::::::::$:* ))0.00.00..momm0004, :, . r 00(0 ....• :::::::::::::::::::.:.:•:.:. - .00000000 .- cfli:.:.:.:. -.. i .::..:. .::..*. : , ,.,., .000000...0_0,• 4.., ....:...::•,..4., • • -----i )0000)000 0000 000 .... .. lia 1.. .4;••••1' '„acilit;.r,fr.'•.(1 C:St rii:, ''' •°000°0°0'0'0 ?..t.', ::::.::.::..:::::::: . ) ..ra •00.0.7 _.••• .iv,.1;:;,. .*.•:. ,. :::::::::::::::::::::•:.:. •-''../-",•••:)..,•.. .,`? ••:::.i.::i:i:i:iii: - • .••,.,'2 A 111,00...• •:••••••,, -, •:•••••3•3•3•••••••:•••:. .0'!.;I:.r..•;:if.;:".•;,•':,,3,..-;:•.•:c.3.. .::i..:•:•:•::.:.:.:. ii . ''414111111kLl'•., •:'•••,. ii:•%41 '3 .:n: :*:' . :' , ).:,,,17 :.:•",i.:•r;.;!''-.1;667 a: :::::::::::::::•:•:•:•1 1001A ,. ' A 4 '"1:' - l'';.4J.3 •;.• ,.. . .,'ib.,.,..... , '''..,..123' s-Pfri le•1.4A ,:;s.,..,;1•s? IP' !ti, .'?''.5V,,.4::.:I.,.,,..i;.i.,.;.?", .:,?;?:',..-.;?;:t,?ilW,...y/..:4,".••,:;:,.'e.,'e..1,-. : :: ....: i:. .i11111011 ..,-,,,i: ) 1-- .'.'4 .,(3... IN r II i.',,.''.`.`f. iii_va•,.2.J.,,.L!,..l',.,1>.efi)).„.:'..,:',,,..`','„-.1.,'-i.'-'ee,.',•;.,;,....":ti,..'.a 7...;.11.:i..;4 7.1.',(.1. .••••':::::::.:: , ..... • :,%.1:r. ''.... .\. 0:,...!.',141i r;, •. P,./) f.Yr,;,• •r?,1,. ". I.5.0..'n:1..•4...A4i 6•:41,...., ,, c,,,,,,i•--` ____, __, 6 •,,...%,;•,:.•,,.,, • l'i ... ,,,,,0_,....- . , • •-• -,,c),. ,,,:ct-i. :.•: ,,--,.,,;•• ,•:.,?„:, '(,.;‘,./,•',.;• -.3111 Mb•......;_,0- III 111.1!•• ' e• je.lenel:.!' ..-3'....3.,•••••ej; r,..3 te.... ' 3-,1-.73 r ...r - r c ,t"....2'd'i:','7.•',-...,•:,.•.' . -. '1"..'C,,.'...,(,r,:,.•••?:.......qi,, . ,,,, , t___,,. ,r„.'.e514.:(1:.,1-"P:L•-.OK, 114, . 'i :.4:ci5v.',.. '..”*.t:..s.„fl.'i.!::''''' -. ..5.Y.:?':.:M;.;\*.i''‘'..le‘.,;-• !:.‘"s" 4EPAC.,_1111(''..(F-*'i... g.;j.,,•'•:'"•rii....r .':-'.. , .6 r.r...sn e•6ec•t//;.••T.:" :'•' • --* L. ••:.P,;.i,,..'11,..,-;.,i;.•.,.,,,,.,:•.r.....,,°,-,..•,..,.•-•s.0."2 ... ' '---, C\rc..r,.-•v-ecl(Pei,:t.: ...',....-• r- -• 1111 .<.;i; '',..0.!•;;;;.y.Y...-...,!,-.'1.-..,..v,, -, . <-- --. ,....Q:c.. -,.p.,:e.:"t!e..-. • ''. ..• .. ';••• •1 , • . •...*c.10.000:8300(01.: 1,,,g.t...,4v,•;;ci 02.c!,••.2.;',..!'p...,.....,,,•;at; ...'"r‘,;, •• .. ....._.... • r, i., 0,OA.if r-,6,:tc,sie,Nce.: ..e:;.(c.'r bOcc.N.c.d.'•KCYZW-c••(ri ':4•• .„,:•;‘,.),.,., ,. 12r.3; 02',e;„,'"•' co)....:0•1:(k3'.%;c;.•<.j3,:4•'',6,,,.1)., A'1:7-.44 . ,..r ,..'<.-''• -C... (1X tiv.'e'er -4 g r 'rtr-c).'-`'-f-r. • 2\ -1 .;ri):°.1.'?..2;-•••,r,c1.•.1h.*,;' ,,'c..• •on, •,„,,,.(4.il• •e• ,•Ic'e•,:, ,larsern?,•-• ''..,. •• •••. ,..r-" •l'o•,,..Aik•44;4•,,,--ick•-..,;'1;'...j."),,, ..,, ?Ikt":%P. '':*''''(1:4'" ''..' ".`1'.''''''..*'''': *.*'`.t,•--- ....N-'' 1%... . ' ‘•••••!*•:.!:-•..e,14.„C{1.1...,c%)7r;I.; . '..;.• ..;':>:'-.'-.-'..,3•• ••.r.A Te'?'".P1T.',;t:••-•''..,1.;4-;':''.;.&: .1 1,..(,,,..;:.'‘.,,c!:-..,..,,,,(.'• ,••::..,r,l'4)••• ,., • •• • ••,...‘:0 ,...‘'!.c i'6“,,o•• ...r;••••2•-••• :...,',... ••••' 3 '•••3 ,...;.'r3'3.1.)' \ •le.,-;C''''.'•6" • ' -.^.a:: :'-'):' ''''''Er;i',Z".%A.-,,,:i•;':..0,:,:,.•.. .711 "''''' •':'t'•°I'', ''3' •-.3''' •$.2.° .••:•..•'••.•••3 •,'.1-.••,..,''.„....). Ir.c,.,,...i, .•*:•-•, ,..' . ....:• ..•• • •'','•C.0 Cl'''-" "'C'.i).".••".-4,2-1,:2 :I-..C.t.r'.1"• ‘.,).9.',., •` . r'S.)!.. '.‘",•;1.: ,.t Z)0•'°:WO.. . ,-1% 0.1.V.T.[Ir."6'•• 3 rY;:;`')IIVI•••,0•,‘;',..;.'„r ' . •'!.'33.:,,• •3:i:::i:3::.:::3*::::i*:•. •' /f L''.'i/.."`••••1•33.•,,,, 3!Ni,•1.Qa*(01'' '4, :x*:.:7 ,„-Are.gilh...: ,:-.----...,-....4"jr-ei=t''' • -- i:::::::i:i:i::*:::.:: :110011. ....,...,.:q:,:...-::.:,.'!.cf; . .). 'Pr."':‘:',`:' ''.c--..•......1.1'.‘t ''15%;-'''''•'.°f';:*...)•1::,!:44'.; . /10p-NW '.‘„.7-Varre).44.lc'.5A-,(f...i,try.i,c.0W-.,q,,b.i:•.0.;1'4:'''.; , •,',.?;:IFi*.:k•...:•Pi•$9 *.% %onbl'o°o° *;1.s. .*:: ;:Mii:i:iii:7: ;\c X.i:::::::::::::::•:.:•:•:••.•:•:•••• ,,,',.:: ''-' ,.1,,,,:1:::::: ,0 0.0 ,,,, \:,,P.00° •‘.;-.'..,'•)-E.; ' , ...„.::•.-e&,....i ,„1.,•.-,rer•ef,c.'.c,e.,.A.g...• ....:•::.:1*:. iiiMb.:,,',..,3';''•LA \ ,i i, ----•-_____1.• ;.' :(407.91!74.r•.'"(!' •':::•$* !fl., )•-•;.‘cy';",.,.`?-1., .:.....Y.,,,.. 0000 • . goo - --- •,1.1`,0'.' ,.....;•;.,. au. ..2.,•4.,„.:•, 0000 I.'. -----.... et, Zit?:.!;..,.... ..:::::::::::.,.. ............ ....... ' '''''''‘''''1; r • ,-.>:,s, -_.•• .....e. •::::::::::::::::: ............. ........c, ,•,,,,41>. . • •__ ... ........ ....... . .,..!.., ,., • 1 _. , .. .,, , . -•• •..........................;:: OD \ ..(S" (a'('' . - •b„z.A.?. ' - ......% - ."-••••" A ...°0°0°A.'0..,. ID.-c.:\--Y • • -• • •• VIL -•2.4“.,.•,.•:'•:..A•:Qv.. • 9,''''). No...v.v.• ,e4 00000000,\\_/.., ..‘310_,'' "..:*::t.:,'"„ •,..f.).,,,,.0,..,;,,x/.. .::. v..:a.)0...ci..‘....1?.,<.,,,D...,, .41.1 .:".: ,•;•. /P ::: A;Vf lirWMW.W •0 86 `000• •0• i''1';1d.J.':p'1,., • ,,, 3..••.,••.,,',••.•ca.,!,'')i',.1•3.)•r,r1 .,)','''<••4;'3.3.0•oe• • •.o.. '..:2.3...).'.21-L;1-' n..r.ri,'''`;1.•s""••P•'?..,:;'3.•:c2i'" '1'17:111.4k.k • '''..'.'•;!.-?•.,..,':•2::•:, `;',‘;;-.1.',,;r3',.ili'.\.:•:.9.'.',ctfi:i'.'i.:•',Vo':,0°‘• .?;•-•." ':9 P,4.6'''• 2.,. ......7...:::::1' ;3,-: i 1 \\Sta tgef.1 'a•°°.•;°0:00°.0°00°0'... ix'c''.'.•;_':'.1.,,,,,-. .,.. A.,,., .,0),.•••2;u.-1, .a.,•„.,•.t13.. .......7.t::::2:1-.:: r.. *L..'" -1'...,•;:...0?!.'%;`'.. • 10 iii...:•:•:.:•:•:•:••• ',Ilk. k r.. . .0 0.0 0• . •00000. 200000 i 00002- .. ,, „, •, ,tr•';'ti''',Y'''•i''•••••',•'''t!•`I'l 1%.,„;.. „.. L,•:;Ic!,.%,•‘7''L.'•,i1...t,-i.,. le..12•;,...`..-•:1„'22,..0.• fr.., •rl.;.;,‘:.''.,;;PY.c'';),:;ii.,i 1.1.1 .crs..1,,•••.•. <21,•••4-.„., ••:::::::::::::::::•:•::::N•.:. •:••‘• -.• 1(1 t n CI 1(1sr, , .,•1'....").... ..1;''.'•71:• ....''.. '::•::::::...•:/•••::•"t•ii.' II Au -4.' -...,,,, .: •••,..,•22I'•„•-,•;):••••.0.": , .:' •••'.•ti 2 •L-ti3: '•-•''''34 • 3 r...qi'..' 3•'.1.1';• e• ... . ........ . o .N o• ',111FAMB '1-• ." - ....,....:•::::-..--.Y.'... . .. , , •- , . ci .'••*:(ii,.ki!'41,1,I .0.000.00000, •Ca..... ‘,•• ,•il .•‘..' { I A.•a ,...i.1• ., • • :•:•:•... n nn nn r. • ....• • / 1 • • •.:.1,.,:•.. .,:,.cr 0,...., , •,....,.••• o...t'''.......4....!: %O.%) 00 . ..,.(..• I 1 .. e•-'01:1V.8:1 .N ': :...;11-Q••(IT.‘'... ‘,..Vt)..'I'.‘t.'• 0:6''''{'`: S'•3LI.', :•••••••0000000 I ] • 000000 ooc000.o.o.o. i • 4,•.,1„,. 1 •000000•- •000000- )•000000 ? - •00000 . 000000 VA 1 .1% le ..s.,...4,3.,.. .e,. • •000000. • .:•,;:.,..... i /.40,,,,e, t, .;• •.• \ t -.. ..J ....k, . '4'44 11 . f:jr;ell \\'''..,:jr r)• ,, 0000000000 ''''••••••.. •.-,:`0.".ti.'"'s.0..' WEIS Ugh....o "o°o°oUci %.001111111411111111 , . Wr :'1.,'I'''47e f'r.1'''' ,2 ,„...,. .. 6i-- ,:.:::.„,,_. \go i I . .7---''' Il I (‘\ • . )000 COOOC •0000•. 000 00,Do. •000000•. '000 0000 ..00000.0000000a )000000000 000000000 •001 000000. mm..00000 1111=1000000 ( f•1 . 10000 .A.C, 00(0 , )1 , 0. .... ..--.-.10 00 , •. „0. ;-r'. •0.00.0.0•• ..r. ............• ,,.... ...000000..00c. .. e 000000000, 00( , 0000000 1.• 0( • 10000000 ••.., )0 000 •• 00 •` ‘ , ...1. ..„., .„,.. •,,,,,,,.,0., ". •.0.. 0000 •,33 VA, 000•. 00000d , 00000. 4k 411141, 000000 . . , 111;1;1P0T)09-fV• - . , . • DM/RON-10MM ARCITECTS . • 1048 W.JAMES ST.SUM 102 - KENT,WAS-INGTON G8332 PH Ote C208)854-5010 • ------'-----,-----. , *-1***,*,••••. .7-,La•-1•1 16*,* -.7 • •wol..........a.ai 411; 151 ----.....,\ i/ /7/1"..------V.- '2 9.29' 9 2.••ca'94. • _OFFICE_ : ffiiiint List - i • ....,-, . • ., OW,1521,1111 - I . • .. 1•0•••••G • P4:25 I'91••05.211 i G.ea...Jo•••-..4.4. artoaL Cti•-•al• .filar EXPANS/ON - 4.0ftre4e CVO,PING l '....*••-*aara•CLA I • • '' -Rag_bak..,Mart. r-V1.Oa.rr-o•IC,OHL m.140 • izz.aon M1.0.1411 me I 7 •.F..).5......I...L.. . 9-7,410 2 h.-1%.29,1042114 219 1 a • .r,„..,,,,RCM,' .,*.V)r.,!... ,..,c.."Inett La..•eraift TrZt . ,"f-=211/..Y.P1 WENZJall: . /•- - (- te 7:7-7*.alr 191• i•U , ' ... .. . e,.... I. Arm-a'..'K.,a4o. ,2 1 \ - i • 1 Di ; IN•45g(FT:-:- AVD4 Aram*L7•402 $LO I • n • •,'s €1,-PeGvOceravri`101.Y12.2r 11.-1A.P2,egg.. - ' sili P.2.22,21.0904 4.1,...n.X= fe-Vi47,114-0. ' •N ®VICOK.4.141 PUCKLT,....cr..0tolio . 25-i.rtf.5C.••.-0... .1• i'4;-. ' . * •. —7— -. —7------ .....n. 1.4.,i • ..........,,-- , i. -4t • . ........,..., ,, • I., <i. . ._• :c ...____-1 i. , r,-.7,,,—, 0.177,1.1..I.C.7.•re•airi kto.,•—• • :14.1 ili..1.1 L-1 Er.C.+231 NT ar,....E. •-Oa an.41.ear......... .. . ' 99...c99. ,...,,,,,,,......... :,,. !:2-11.19 • 4‘...•erV.J.44124173.10,7„4E8=6) • - l , . •Wee,...1.6... . • I.. „ ., . • • : I ARUM. ...10;CATC .,1...; Li..23C.A!.+.0; •••b•CE • r ..7.. Iter.........-, 0 I • , . . ,........ LAT' rag .4fgco.cc-f ,ft . riE r2t, • 'S.levE . • ..440•46f0..X. A.. IU0t4X20.. .e., . . . r • . L•ww....wc., :,, EX:.-"...1&. . . ' • • ,,,_ .._ • .........1 00.0. ...•43011"..•••••••..-.1.9 ..._._ :.'1• .... -4 aSIMEECESSESZCZMISM=SOC:=0 - • ICI, „,,,,,.,, ,( = 4—i--••••••*1 Ibtattild • •:••,.....-....1.-41 :, 1 ....,scr•.....1 • •-,--''' .............r a•••••••- - ..•i N • . - r! IL 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 , , ,.. •., • . . 1 • --- -.------———- ----- -——.--.—.------—Z.— Lwoicarg pLAL1 ! , e• . .i ...,.., . ..•:.,. . ' • • 11....••• • . • eA‘WE PLAN LANDSCAPING PLAN .... ..... ............ Imo.•2., .• • . . . . ••• - 1 i • . 1.•••.7 • ... . _ . . . . . . • . : t • . . . H /RON-10VDE /......./..... CR.. RAW.1 !..........! ARCHITECTS .... • , . _ _. ..:::::::....4: - . .— ---1 1048 W.JAWS ST,SURE 102 KENT,WAS-INGTON Wm> ... PHOW:(206)854-5010 -l — _ _ •--___. ,,..„. " - . =_---• . r"--• ==, --=.- ------• ---'Hi —_.=- __, ri,..1 .0 •7,,------ _.....,._ I. 1 1 ___„. _._. ..,-_ a 1 —.--- ,- 4. '4--' --: L__. -g . 11:111S:I I 1 74 e•,.....6 MIL!• F....sew,VICLCIVRE ".V.......1 erFt#CIIMZ ct # NORTH ELEVATION v.0,,,o• OFFICE BUILDING --7-17 • ---- EXPANSION ..---- • ---. .:::',4 r----- • _______ .•_.. _ ____ _.• -,...T---, I,- _.__ ----. :-._„___ ...,_, --- 1 . .........., —_, . _________. . ____ . — --- ,. ,---:-: --- --.--- ,......, L........... ----- •---' r-A • -- - :....--- i : , -- -7. L ., 1 f ,1 ...=__ --. -._ , I ---.-- 1 1 ! . .,...E.........:....4 n 0...E.!G......4CME. )? • SOUTH aEVATION . . :-- , i 7 . • , 1 - . ! . —IL i. — --- • , — i _ --- 7.- 7-7::- .-- . —_— .... -• _ i -......3 2c.-,..” • ^.1,wE.-t.EZ(•••." 1 _ WEST!ELEVATION v6•.:•-c" I ---, . . -. 1 . . . — -17-= 7:47" .— . . . r .7. . , d . ....... . . ---9J . Dor!....en ! .....1.....0 ..r Idr...... EAST ELEVATION . ...ma.6537 .....ft, • ., SS ,...0 d ' Prawn ft 172 ....-.-.... . . _,••-•... ,...—: c.c...••••?, . . _ • Om..........e. . . . 1 _ , > • rL lr 1 t l -.1.. 1 l *- ac, _II r, ti , s4"w? I' 0,. 'I. 1{{. .1•�•.II•.Ill.. .,. . • . - lilt!. , ST. ,' %, 1 S7 „' ;.! . i I, . _ ..34.:.'74!....;17. 2 -y;. C .A. R j 1 '1• • r � %I r u•j i N . 1 I �_;_ I I r � :: - 3 iii 1' ' • I I• , a ,•,, it., S . - : .. G 1 ,.., ,., .1. .,.__ , .. i.• — L r , . .L,_____ I N .iI. I • -9. _ '�• d • Pup_ N- .f� 7 I 1 '. , i t i I I r - - , ,. R, . . 1 . : I _ 1 \ J • . . . . . z . . .___ f !Q _... . . . LLIJ , • iiY L I. ' ' 6, , _ fel,I. • _ .1- 5.. ' • g III o 1 I ; 2 i 1 ' i mt., 7. Sit64 tie. �!i... B-.1 1 1 1/ �R-3 l — - - r G-1 4 1. . ., 1 3 G 1 • • • . ._.. _i . . ---- -- , .___. • 1 i • IJ i .:41 I fP(,�p.. 053+ESS �.. :11: . ,,...s;7,: ,-- > 1 _ Rom.2 `, ,� Y i • OLD NATIONAL BANK . . SA-121-88 ,R, ECF • • • ' APPLICANT DNA/RONHOVDE ARCHITECTS TOTAL AREA 1.41 ACRE ' PRINCIPAL ACCESS N.E . 4th STREET & BREMERTON AVE N.E. EXISTING ZONING OP . EXISTING USE OFFICE PROPOSED USE OFFICE ONLY - NO RETAIL • • COMPREHENSIVE LAND .USE PLAN COMMENTS PROPERTY' IS LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF N.E . FOURTH STREET AND BREMERTON AVENUE N.E. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARIN AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT Audrey isencie r ,being first duly sworn on oath states HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUN- CIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RENTON, WASH- INGTON, ON APRIL 11, 1988, AT 9:00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING VALLEY DAILY NEWS PETITION: OLD NATIONAL BANK (ECF; R; SA- • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition 121-88) Applicant seeks to: 1)rezone 1.41 acre site Dailyfrnewspapers six (6) times a week.That said newspapers 2 om Oi (Officee Park)to alB- (Commercial);n published2)obtain site plan approval to construct an are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six approximately 5,200 square foot addition to months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published the existing Old National Bank building. The property is located at the southwest in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King corner of N.E. Fourth Street and Bremerton County,Washington.The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal Avenue N.E. newspaper order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for Legal descriptions Rentonof the files ed by P g above are on file in the Community King County. Development Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRE- The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the Kent Edition SENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON , Renton Edition , Auburn Edition , (and not in EX EXPRRESSS THEEIRIR OPINIONS8, AT 9S A.M. TO . supplement form) which w'As regularly distributed to its subscribers Published March 31, 1989 Valley Daily during the below stated period.The annexed notice a News R5210 Notice of Public Hearing was published on March 31, 1989 R5210 The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $ 2 2 .4 Subscribed and sworn to before me this 17 t h day of April 19_$9 No Public for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, King County, Washington. VDN 4167 Revised'1 48fi 17 • • • • , ,. • . • • • • '1'..1',::jr:j." . . • ,,, • • - .. .. . -. .• . . .• • . ,:,,g.11.,,,•':, • . ,•..,..4.31m, .....-'..;:?..fitON se ..,, . . •! -, .. maiL k- te . • . '...,-,';..f!,,vili;-y,i; -'•. .,''-;i.;:'51P,4,k,,. •: : . .4 7.& ..,v...kee' . . •.•'; , • 'D SEP,- ' , • • .,' , • . ''' : : • '. • • • •''..(' • ' ''i?,'.14,41, . ' •' ;:.05.1..., • • .. , . .•'.2-'.4 t.:( ';' . .• .:.,...' • City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner . . • • , . .. • • • . . ' '••iii,,i•,,•-• . . will hold a • .' . . . $i:,..,itq' , . • . • . •...i,..,,o, . • • ,A,Irli.;' ' HEARING . •. , • .•.• 11 IP.,, • H . i •'‘: . ' ' API,•:, • ,i, .. ...,..... puBtle in . ., ,.,. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS , . CITY HALL ' . .. . .. • . . . ..,,.„ . . ON • . APRIL 11, 1989 BEGINNING AT 9: °A.M. .. . p.m. :•1.;.i.: ECF-121-88, R-121-88, SA-121-88. ' ., ,::,•,,, CC)NCERNING: OLD NATIONAL BANK . • - ,,,,;.- . • . . . . •';',.!,I,13,:l. . •,',irt.;,--•• .APPLICANT SEEKS TO: 1) REZONE 1.41 ACRE SITE FROM OP (OFFICE • PARK) TO B-1 (COMMERCIAL) ; 2) OBTAIN SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO • f',;•1:'4•: • CONSTRUCT AN APPROXIMATELY 5, 200 SQ.FT. ADDITION TO THE EXISTING • OLD NATIONAL BANK . BUILDING. . ,._:7:_,.. .1-.7 . (it. -1 r-..• • ...:. AI: ' y.s-- ki 0....i:i .1.1i,:.. ---- • -.--- R .,.... 2. •1 .1 .. .. ..,, ,,,,,,. lill,pil1112...174!!),i ). 4pppotl . -. .il .!. 0..; .i 1 - - ' --' '' 1,3 1. f It 4.71....... . , ii I.:1•:li .,.11.2.1_. 1 -EU .\___........ . \Ira*••••s••.1..1 I•• .• • ti 1 1 ;,..1 00 II'• ...' 1:1.,.. , , • _ t -• t_ ..•I .0.1 1,1 ; r'....: ':'.1 '''1.1.(0••1.;•.1.: i'''t •I I --II --- .4:111 n ft:-•• Vi cr • •:!1:40;1 ii 1 .. ,.,.,. , ... . . .1-".••:-i 3 1'11•11, ti tt ! !....11 .___ __ . • l',1,:. .... •1.. .•;-••:;, .1: .fi:;';:t:-•,,;.;i ,. . .-..__ . 111:1.:1 IJ 41.11.111.1i(!,;:ii, 1 . 1 • .• • • ,, lir•.• .., , , •• __.., •, •.• ,.... 1.1 II..... I I. .• • 1 I.; '1'7.; .. . •:--:-".1 .:i••• :••••..;.-:'-t.. ...". 1 1 - 1 . .., . .. 11., ,., . . . : 1 112:J1 .. • . Gi1 : ( t.i.,;:. .:..• . -,,:l.ii .1,1 A.;:i...... i •. / I p..:,I,., ii71.1 . •.11, i. :i -'': .W. I_1 Iii.7.111.1--Furr i . . • • -. - .. ly•• ....,,,T...r. •.• • _. ,J!... a ,ii. 2.::*. 71 li 11:: ---i-r-r1- 1-1-'------ Oh 1 -: • I. qr ., . .! :,'!,i,•1; , • • • 1 ___11 —% , • % 1.. !.....,,,,, 4 ",I :•:.ii it;,.• !4.0,:il! :I.,,:., ' R II • - . r.....j • - - -.- -— •( .. •.•..... •....•• .. . ' :--__'_1-1.;1 II,;•1-;F1I_-.: i.1.--1--“---.(-.....‘,,-_I_-1._-3.P,.r..-_1___._I..__._...1,"l'''' .. 1_ ! --E-- -.%-1......:1. . _-_-.-,.-, . .1 :.:.•:•::'1•'.•.'.f-;"•i•14•I;•4•;.i•l:p:.:••.•.iY,•.'...'.':•.'. .''.;.':'i1;..,1_.•i:•_..I I,!1.;_21-.L1,1-.:..._.I'_i!1...5_I1(:._:.:-:,.;'4 1;1?T,1'1: r7t e:I ,) ,II11\L2 _1- _ , ii .? „ t 1:1: • , , — i / 511e, 0).1 , — ; 1 !r. Ii:!: .... :. ::..!1.•::::, • 4./iiill • . 1 1 , ril . , j,. •,, i . ....:...,.vo..,..:,... . 1 I 1 , •--- • ...", • L.. 44.1. I'• o-,• ;Av. i •'... Y.It. I 1 ••:. •••....P.A..:•,, 1 • - I (1-.1 Lin-3 . .• t•,1.11•:•t; • . .••••••;:,;:••, : .'1,•:,. •,• tLI---•'• • • . . ., 1 i_________..._._._.____'1 . t . l . • •d • 1!.,.•'.Imi• . ''.."•'• !-'''..i.'' ; ) ', .„ il,Iii...:1 .. ---•s_, G-- -1 1 . t I. I tr:i. .. :. ,P.".. •:".'1.. . P '.'•!. :. . .,,',: ', • ' . 1 . ..I. . • . ..- ... • — I I • . .1 1 •:.::. •••••• • d.;•;,• . . I -1- -- I • i. /1*.:••• • • 1. •I • ::`.: 1 I I I . i _ __ _ .....• •-.1 I t • •• • • • GENERAL: • L C-- .L TIoN AN -110 -. -AD RESS4 .„.. . . . . . . . . . .., PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF N.E. FOURTH STREET AND BREMERTON AVENUE N.E. ' ., . • : .. , . '•.., . . FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON. . •BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 ., • ..:, . . , . . THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE . REMOVED WITHOUT .; Pm\ OPER AUTHORIZATION CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA COMMENCING AT 9 : 00 AM, APRIL 11, 1989 COUNCIL CHAMBERS, SECOND FLOOR, RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING The application(s) listed are in order of application number only and not necessarily the order in which they will be heard. Items will be called for hearing at the discretion of the Hearing Examiner. OLD NATIONAL BANK ECF; R; SA-121-88 Applicant seeks to: 1) rezone 1.41 acre site from OP (Office Park) to B-1 (Commercial) ; 2) obtain site plan approval to construct an approximately 5, 200 square foot addition- to the existing Old National Bank building. The property is located at the southwest corner of N.E. Fourth Street and Bremerton Avenue N.E. iI • y:/ - L COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING April 11, 1989 APPLICANT: Sunset Square Management/Ronhovde Architects FILE NUMBER: ECF; SA; R-121-88 LOCATION: N.E. Fourth Street and Bremerton Ave. N.E. A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: Applicant seeks to: 1) rezone the 1. 41 acre subject property from Office Park (O-P) to Business' District (B-1) ; and to obtain site plan approval for a building addition of approximately 5,200 square feet to a structure (4070 square feet) existing on the site. B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record: Dennis Dochnal 2 . Applicant: Sunset Square Management/Ronhovde Architects 3 . Existing Zoning: Office Park (O-P) 4 . Existing Zoning in the Area: Office Park (O-P) ; Business District (B-1) ; Medium Density Multi-Family Residential (R-3) ; and General Use (G-1) . 5. Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Eastern three-quarters of the property is designated for commercial use; the western quarter of the property is • designated for medium density multi-family residential use. 6. Size of Property: 1. 41 acres 7 . Access: N.E. Fourth Street 8. Land Use: Commercial use 9. Neighborhood Characteristics: North: Medium density multi- family residences. East: Commercial use. South: Single-family residences. West: Undeveloped land; single- family residences. C. HISTORICAL/BACKGROUND: Action File Ordinance Date Initial Annexation A-005-84 3946 October 7, 1985 c PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER Ola 'National Bank PUBLIC HEARING April 11, 1989 Page 2 Change of Zoning Classification from G-1 to 0-P R-105-84 3948 October 14, 1985 D. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1. Utilities , a. Water: Eight inch main along N.E.Fourth Street. b. Sewer: Eight inch main along Bremerton Avenue and twelve inch main along N.E. 4th Street. c. ' Storm Water Drainage: Storm water from this site drains in a generally southeasterly direction into Maplewood Creek. 2 . Fire Protection: Provided by the City of Renton as per ordinance requirements. 3 . Transit: METRO Route 111 travels along N.E. Fourth Street 4. Schools: Not applicable 5. Recreation: Not applicable E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1. Section 4-3014, Change of Zone Classification (Rezone) . 2 . Section 4-711, Business District (B-1) . 3 . Section 4-718, Office Park District (O-P) . 4 . Section 4-738, Site Plan Review F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT: 1. Northeast Renton Plan, City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium, 1986 (pgs. 55-60) . 2 . Commercial Goal, Objectives and Policies, City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium, 1986 (pgs. 16-18) . 3 . Urban Design Goal, Objectives and Policies, City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium, 1986 (pgs. 11-14) . G. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1. The applicant, Dennis Dochnal, owns a 1. 41 acre parcel of property at N.E. Fourth Street and Bremerton Avenue N.E. It is currently developed with a 4070 square foot structure, Old National Bank. The applicant is seeking to rezone this parcel from Office Park Use (OP) to Commercial Use (B-1) to facilitate the construction of a 5200 square foot addition to the existing bank structure. The proposed structure is to be used primarily for offices. The proposed development would be permitted under the current Office Park zoning designation. The rezone is sought to facilitate the development of an addition which is more compatible with the existing on-site development and surrounding developments (e.g. height, bulk, setbacks) than that which would be mandated for the proposed structure on this site by standards for development in the Office Park zone. c „' PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER ' Old National Bank PUBLIC HEARING April 11, 1989 Page 3 2 . The Environmental Review Committee evaluated this proposal. The Committee was primarily concerned with aesthetic impacts, noise, light and glare, traffic, public service impacts, utilities and infrastructure impacts upon surrounding residential and commercial uses. On February 22 , 1989 the Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated, for the above-described application. The mitigating conditions are listed as follows: a. That the applicant be required to develop a landscaping plan in order to provide a visual buffer, and a light and glare buffer between the site and neighboring properties, subject to the approval of the City's landscape planner; b. That the applicant submit a plan for traffic mitigation, including the following measures, subject to the approval of the Traffic Engineering Division: 1. A joint access easement for shared access to N.E. 4th Street from a driveway at the northeast corner of the site. Note: Such easement must be duly recorded with King -County with copies sent to the City of Renton. 2.. Signage and striping at the entrance/exist of the N.E. 4th Street driveway which designates •right-in/right-out turns only.. 3 . A plan for providing pedestrian linkage (e.g. raised sidewalks, painted crossing pathways) from the bank to the parking area and the adjacent public right-of-way to ensure safe pedestrian passage. c. That the applicant voluntarily bond for an amount of $30, 000.00, for their share of future traffic mitigation measures that are being identified in a Traffic Benefit Zone for this transit corridor. This contribution is recommended to be in the form of a bond valid for at least a period of five (5) years. Note: In the event that the proponent's fair share of support for traffic mitigation is determined to be less than $30, 000.00, a refund will be provided. In no case will the proponent be required to contribute more than $30,000. 00. d. That the applicant submit the following plans for approval by the Public Works Department prior -to implementing construction activities in order to mitigate impacts from those activities to the site and the neighboring properties: 1) an erosion control plan; 2) a plan for wheel-washing of construction vehicles prior to their entry onto the roadway in order to prevent the tracking of dirt and debris off- site; 3) periodic watering down of the site to control dust; 4) a plan for haul routes and hours of operation to limit traffic impacts also subject to approval by the Police Department and Traffic Engineering; and 5) a $2 ,000. 00 bond to enable street clean-up. 3 . Various City Departments have reviewed and commented on the proposal. The majority of staff reviewers recommended that the proposal be approved with conditions. Staff comments are attached; the content of these comments has been addressed as appropriate in this report. REZONE 4. Section 4-3014 (C, 1) lists three criteria that the Hearing Examiner is asked to consider along with all other relevant information in making a decision on a rezone application. c PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER Old National Bank PUBLIC HEARING April 11, 1989 Page 4 a. That substantial evidence was presented demonstrating the subject reclassification appears not to have been specifically considered at the time of the last area land use analysis and area zoning. The subject property was one section of an area annexed into the City in October of 1984. The area as a whole was designated for G-1, General Use, however, a request for rezone of the subject property to Commercial Use (B-1) was made concurrently with the annexation application. The City supported a rezone to Office Park, which was granted in 1984 . There has been no general land use analysis of the area in which the subject property is located since 1982 . Thus, there is no evidence suggesting that the site was not specifically considered at the time of the last area land use analysis in 1982 . b. That the property is potentially classified for the proposed zone being requested pursuant to the policies set forth in the Comprehensive Plan and conditions have been met which would indicate the change is appropriate. The Comprehensive Plan designates the eastern approximately three-quarters of the property for commercial use; the remaining property is designated for medium-density multi-family use. The site is currently developed with a commercial use. The Comprehensive Plan Goals, Policies and Objectives for Commercial Development throughout the City and the Northeast Renton Area Plan policies generally support commercial zoning for this site. For example: Commercial Development V.A. Commercial Areas Objective: Sound commercial areas should be created and/or maintained. V.A. 1. Commercial zoning should only be allowed to the extent of short term needs. V.A.4 Commercial areas to be located and designed to minimize travel and congestion. V.A.7 Commercial areas should be compatible with adjacent land uses. Northeast Renton Area Policies III.B. 3 Development should progress logically . . . on the East Renton Plateau. III.B.4 To help balance home to work traffic trips the Land Use Plan strongly endorses employment opportunities in the vicinity of . . .N.E. 4th and Duvall Avenue N.E. Staff note that in 1984, at the time of annexation, an application was made to rezone the subject property, together with other parcels included in the annexation, for commercial use. The City did not support the action to rezone the entire annexation area to Commercial Use at that time, but did support an action to rezone all of the properties to Office Park, in order to allow non-residential development, while discouraging "strip commercial development" as directed in Section V.A. 3 of the Comprehensive Plan and Sections III.B. 1/2 of the Northeast Plan. c PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER Old National Bank PUBLIC HEARING April 11, 1989 Page 5 In supporting the reasonableness of the proposed rezone, staff note that: *The subject property is a single lot which was one section of an annexation area. The parcel is currently developed with a commercial/service use (which was in place at the time of annexation) and which conforms to the Comprehensive Plan designation for the majority of the property; the proposed use is an expansion designed to provide improved service. * Properties immediately surrounding the subject site are currently designated on the Comprehensive Plan Map for a variety of residential, commercial, and office uses. * This rezone action would be consistent with the - preponderance of Comprehensive Plan Goals, Policies and Objectives. Zoning, Comprehensive Plan designations and current development would appear to limit the likelihood of "strip commercial development. " * Existing restrictive covenants which require site plan approval for any development on the property could be retained to ensure that future development is compatible with the Comprehensive Plan, with surrounding developments and with community needs. * The Comprehensive Plan's Land Use Map is intended to reflect uses appropriate to general areas, rather than to provide designations for specific properties. c. That since the last previous land use analysis of the area zoning of the subject property, authorized public improvements, permitted private development, or other circumstances affecting the subject property have undergone significant and material change. The subject property is located in the northeastern section of the City, which is undergoing rapid development with a variety of public, commercial and residential uses. In the Comprehensive Plan, staff reports that this development trend is anticipated to continue through the next decade. The site itself is on a major travel corridor; proximate to commercial and residential developments. The City has planned for and begun to implement plans to provide adequate public improvements/services (e.g. larger utility lines) to serve anticipated new projects. The existing development on site, together with authorized and anticipated new development in the area and the existence of adequate improvements (e.g. roadway,curbs, gutters, lighting) serve to support the appropriateness of the proposed rezone. d. The final test to determine whether a rezone is appropriate is to address the question of timeliness: is it appropriate to rezone the subject property at this time? The proposed reclassification is consistent with the type and density of land uses which are increasingly being developed and are anticipated for the area in the future. Commercial zoning of the property would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan as well. Also, the commercial rezone is intended to address the short-term commercial needs of the applicant, rather than to facilitate speculative actions. c PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER Old National Bank PUBLIC HEARING 4 . April 11, 1989 Page 6 The subject site is an infill site. At present the existing public services/improvements are sufficient to support the proposed rezone (See Attachment "A") . The City has undertaken to develop plans to provide adequate public improvements/services (e.g. larger utility lines, roadway improvements) to serve anticipated new projects. The proponent may be required to upgrade some services (e.g. water lines, sewer lines) to meet the immediate needs of. the project (See Attachment "A") . However, no unmitigable burden is anticipated to be placed upon the City from the proposed rezone; therefore, staff believe that the request for reclassification of the subject property to B-1, Commercial Use, is timely. SITE PLAN REVIEW 5. Section 4-738 D. 1 lists ten criteria that the Hearing Examiner is asked to consider along with all other relevant information in making a decision on a Site Plan Approval application. These include the following: a. Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan, its elements and policies; The Comprehensive Plan Goals, Policies and Objectives for Commercial Development throughout the City and the Northeast Renton Area Plan policies generally support commercial zoning for this site. As noted previously in this report (Section 4 .b) , for example, the primary Comprehensive Plan Commercial Goal calls for the promotion of attractive, convenient, viable systems of commercial facilities. Policy V.A. 1. calls for commercial zoning to be allowed only to the extent of short term needs -- utilization of the existing bank is sufficiently. intense so as to require expansion to improve services to the local community. Policy V.A.4 calls for commercial areas to be located and designed to minimize travel and congestion -- expansion will provide new local employment opportunities. Policies V.A.7 calls for commercial areas to be compatible with adjacent land uses -- the subject property is surrounded primarily by commercial and multi-family residential uses. Northeast Renton Area Policies III.B. 3/4 call for development of commercial uses which are accessible and convenient. Similarly, the proposed project addresses many of the Comprehensive Plan Goals, Policies and Objectives for Urban Design. For example: III Urban Design Goal: To promote aesthetic and functional harmony and to provide a proper balance of residential, commercial and industrial areas. III.A. Growth and development should occur in a timely and logical progression. . .to maximize the use of existing services. III.A.5. A balance of residential, commercial and industrial areas should be achieved. III.B.8. Development should be harmonious both in intensity and architectural design within a district. b. Conformance with existing land use regulations; The proposed development meets or exceeds B-1, Commercial Use, (Section 4-711) regulations with respect to permitted uses as well as development standards of the zone, including lot coverage, height of the proposed structure, and building setbacks. c PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER Old National Bank PUBLIC HEARING April 11, 1989 . Page 7 Specifically, development of the proposed single-level 5200 square foot project, combined with the existing 4070 square foot Old National Bank on this 1.41 acre parcel, would result in lot coverage of approximately twenty per cent; impervious surfaces added in for parking and on-site travel result in a proposed lot coverage of approximately 70 per cent (maximum permitted coverage) . The complex is proposed to be set back approximately twenty feet (20' ) from the western boundary (Bremerton Avenue) ; approximately twenty feet from the drive-through service on the eastern boundary and approximately 65 feet from the main structure; approximately 65 feet from the southern boundary; and approximately 85 feet from the northern boundary (N.E. 4th Street) . The proposed development also generally meets the requirements of the Parking and Loading Ordinance (Title 4, Chapter 22) . Conditions established by the Environmental Review Committee (Section G. 2) will ensure conformance with requirements set by the Landscaping Ordinance (Section 4-744) . (Note: The proposed Old National Bank expansion would be permitted under the existing Office Park Zoning designation. However, development standards for that zone would require that a new structure be set back to a point on the parcel which would, in turn, require a considerably higher building, in order to achieve the space necessary for efficient operation and service provision. As Comprehensive Plan Objective III.B.8 . suggests that new development be "harmonious both in intensity and architectural design" it would be appropriate to rezone the property to address this objective. ) c. Mitigation of impacts to surrounding properties and uses; The site is bound by vacant property and a single-family residence to the east, and by commercial development to the north, and with vacant land, single-family residences and multiple family residential projects to the south and west. Potential impacts to the surrounding environment and to neighboring land uses were identified in the areas of aesthetics, light and glare, and traffic circulation. The proponent has addressed these impacts, in part, through the design and location of the proposed structure, and of attendant amenities, such as parking and landscaping. The Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated, for this project on February 27, 1989, with conditions developed to also address the above-defined environmental impacts (Section G.2) as they would affect surrounding properties. Similarly, conditions established in conjunction with this site plan review are intended to mitigate land use impacts from the proposed development. For example, recommendations have been made for revisions/improvements to access and on-site travel routes in order to mitigate traffic impacts. The proponent has also been requested to contribute funds to the City to a fair share of off-site traffic mitigation activities (e.g. signalization, turning lanes) to be implemented by the City at .a future date. Drive-through banking and the "automatic teller machine" have been located in a manner which facilitates efficient operation, in order to minimize traffic congestion and noise (See Site Plan Map) . Landscaping/screening (ten foot wide areas on the east, south and west boundaries, and a lawn area of a minimum of twenty feet in width along the north boundary) have been/will be designed to provide a visual buffer, as well as a light and c PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER Old National Bank PUBLIC HEARING April 11, 1989 Page 8 glare buffer between the site and neighboring properties (See Site Plan Map) . On-site exterior pole lighting has been designed at a suitable scale and located around the structure and parking area to illuminate the site for safe use by consumers and employees, as well as emergency services, while minimizing off-site light and glare. • This office/commercial development appears to be compatible with local commercial uses and has been mitigated, as well, to be compatible with neighboring residential and uses. d. Mitigation of impacts to the site; The proposed development as designed by the applicant, in combination with conditions established for this project by the Environmental Review Committee in the Determination of Non- Significance - Mitigated (See Section G.2) , should serve to adequately mitigate impacts to this site from the proposed development. For example, service operations (walk-in and drive-up) , administrative/office operations and parking have generally been designed to provide an attractive, safe, functional development for consumers and employees. The new structure is proposed to be of an architectural style which complements the existing structure; similarly, facade materials and roofing materials will be consistent between both sections of the Old National Bank. Staff recommend that all windows be constructed of clear or light tinted glass to ensure good visibility into the bank from the outside, to provide adequate interior lighting and to increase safety (better visiblity decreases likelihood of criminal activity. ) Environmental conditions (Section G.2) requiring signage (ground signs and low -- three foot high -- pole signs) and striping are intended to ensure efficient on- site travel for vehicles. Conditions requiring pedestrian linkage (e.g. raised sidewalks, painted crossing pathways) from the bank to the parking area and adjacent public rights-of-way are intended to ensure safe pedestrian passage. Staff recommend that sidewalks and crosswalks be a minimum of 48 inches in width for convenient passage. Exterior lighting should also provide a suitable level of illumination throughout the site for consumer and employee protection and crime prevention. e. Conservation of area-wide property values; The development is generally anticipated to have a positive impact on property values since the proposed commercial/office complex will: a) serve as an addition/improvement to currently developed property; b) provide improved quality and quantity of services; and c) provide increased local employment opportunities. f. Safety and efficiency of vehicle and pedestrian circulation; Based upon ITE Report estimates, the proposed office development will generate approximately 149 new daily vehicle trips. Impacts from this traffic can be adequately addressed by the proponent's plans and City recommendations for: 1) voluntary contribution of $30, 000 (bond or letter of credit) , to a plan for improvements to N.E. 4th Street to be based upon a traffic analysis of that corridor (*) ; 2) location of vehicle ingress/egress points at N.E. 4th Street and Bremerton Avenue; 3) location of on-site travel routes; 4) signage at entryways and directional indicators along travel routes; 4) improved c PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER Old National Bank PUBLIC HEARING April 11, 1989 Page 9 pedestrian access; 5) parking area for 37 cars as required by the Parking and Loading Ordinance; and 6) on-site exterior lighting. (See Sections G.2 , G.5.c and G.5.d) . These plans/recommendations should enable safe, efficient use of the site for vehicles and pedestrians. (Note: N.E. Fourth Street is a heavily utilized corridor. At present Levels of Service are variable along the corridor as a whole, however, at present the area in the vicinity of the site provides an acceptable level of service, and the proposed development is not anticipated to alter that level. The City is undertaking a traffic analysis of the N.E. Fourth Street corridor,. When that analysis is complete a set of specific improvement plans will be developed and a TBID will be established to fund those improvements to ensure acceptable levels of service along N.E. Fourth Street in conjunction with likely future development. The applicant will contribute now to . a fair share of future improvements, which will be made at a later date [See Section G. 2 for specific condition],) . g. Provision of adequate light and air; ' The proponent has designed and located the primary existing bank structure and the proposed addition (both single-story structures of approximately 20 feet in height) so that they are well separated from neighboring sites to reduce shadow impacts and to retain open space on the property. Those features, combined with landscaping, should serve to ensure that adequate light and air are provided on-site and that there is no reduction of light or air to neighboring properties. h. Mitigation of noise, odors and other harmful or unhealthy_ conditions; Noise is anticipated during construction, however, sounds are not anticipated to exceed the threshold provided by the Noise Ordinance. One measure proposed to mitigate noise impacts (particularly to nearby residences) is the limitation of construction activity to the hours between 8: 00 a.m. and 5: 00 • p.m. During the construction phase of the project, some of the construction noise will be buffered from the adjacent properties by the existing commercial building and by existing screening. Predicted increases intravel to the site are expected to generate no significant increase in noise. As noted in Section G.5. f of this report, the proposed expansion is intended to be utilized primarily as office space, which, may, in turn, improve services to existing customers. A maximum of 149 trips is estimated to the site daily. Armored cars visiting the site are somewhat noisier than customer/employee vehicles, however, the number of these trips is limited (1-3 per day) , 'and' no increase is anticipated as a result of this proposed office development. No other significant noise sources have been identified in conjunction with this proposed. development. Note is made of the fact that the development is proposed adjacent to N.E. Fourth Street,;' a principal arterial, which generates considerable noise , through customary corridor travel. The structures and drive-up services, as well as access routes and parking areas, have been designed and located to mitigate noise impacts. Standard business hours of operation for most banking services and the location of "24 hour automatic teller services" well away from neighboring properties should further mitigate impacts to surrounding residential units during c PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER Old National Bank PUBLIC HEARING April 11, 1989 Page 10 evenings and weekends. Screening will assist in containment of noise on-site. Finally, staff note that the development is located adjacent to a major arterial, N.E. 4th Street -- it is not expected that traffic on-site will generate any noise in excess of that generated by through traffic along N.E. 4th Street. The project is not anticipated to have any odors or other harmful impacts. While the project is located within Zone II of the Aquifer Protection Area, no harmful impacts are anticipated from the proposed development. i. Availability of public services and facilities to accommodate the proposed use; As noted above in this report (Section 4 .c) , the site is adequately served by existing utilities, such as water and sewer. Public transportation is available along N.E. 4th Street. Staff from the Police Department and Fire Prevention Bureau have indicated that the proposed facility would not place a major burden on their respective services. Adherence to standard Code provisions for access and signage are anticipated to be sufficient to allow for adequate emergency services. The existing adjacent roadways -- N.E. 4th Street and Bremerton Avenue N.E. -- are currently able to meet the traffic generated by the project, or can be improved to do so with modifications to on-site and off-site systems. (See G.5. f. ) j . Prevention of neighborhood deterioration and blight. The proposed facility is anticipated to have a positive impact on surrounding properties and on the local area as a whole by providing improved services and local employment opportunities, which are conveniently located with respect to a major arterial, to other commercial uses, and to nearby residences. Further the improvement of the existing commercial structure may serve to enhance the area as a whole and, possibly, act as a catalyst for new development and/or other redevelopment efforts in the area. 6. The project, as modified by the environmental conditions (Section G.2) and land use conditions recommended in this report, shall be in the public interest; will. not be a burden on public services; is compatible with the adjacent commercial and residential development; and will provide an attractive commercial development in keeping with the existing and anticipated new commercial developments in the area. H. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION: Based upon the above analysis, it is recommended that the Hearing Examiner: 1. Recommend to the City Council in favor of the proposed reclassification (R-121-88) of the subject property from OP, Office Park, to B-1, Commercial Use, subject to the following condition: a. That the applicant provide a restrictive covenant to require site plan review for future development or design modification of the property to ensure continuing compatibility of uses on the subject property with area properties and continuing availability of public services/utilities/infrastructure to serve such development. c PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER ' Old National Bank PUBLIC HEARING April 11, 1989 Page 11 2 . Approve the proposed site plan (SA 121-88) for expansion of Old National Bank, with the following conditions: a. That the applicant comply with conditions established by the Environmental Review Committee on February 27 , 1989. Note: Staff recommend that the plans developed by the applicant in compliance with conditions established Environmental Review Committee be subject to approval by the City's Landscape Planner and by the Public Works Department. MEMORANDUM To Lenora Blauman Date 4-3-89 From Ronald L. Olsen Subject Old National Bank ECF; R; SA-121-88 The Heath Downs sanitary sewer trunk, per a recent study, is just about at capacity and will be at capacity as present property on existing mains connect . up. It is the recommendation of the Public Works Department that the aforementioned plat be allowed to hook up to the sanitary sewer system, subject to executing a temporary service agreement requiring them to participate in the cost of a new trunk main at such time that it is constructed, and that this covenant be recorded with the sale of each lot of such subdivision. Aat Rona d L. Olsen t ''')'U 111'Y.I`— iLuri±H ll1..__.._ _ F. lilt. ' ST ',. _ l'*"' SI 1 1-7—'i 0 I. e z .ti W li \ ., . . _" J i2 • `♦ 1 I t. ,�1 a _n .,, 0 • � , .11 u ..I' a i•,... _. 1. . ...• . r_..._ ___._ . , •,.. voA. „, G 1 _ _ 1 :pu6-0NH'.. eitn lEA---41G-1 1 . . .. , , ; . - \\--_ . . {71,:v..,....1 . • ilii I -I- ' " I 1 . . pp ii.j. 3 . . , , 1 . . .,. I, B - 1 . . . ! Z I H R-3 • • B-1 �. I•.. . 7 • . 0 "71 I. I • “ . '.."' �fu s� ( 1 l viovej 1 ?. i SubsecA �1 1 w•:,:;:; I IIM i. 'I I. Z Site, --- —'�T 1�►;4.4 I I I IG-1 IR-3 1 T1* Gil .1 \ • . - • „. - . . • OLD NATIONAL BANK , SA-121-88,R, ECF APPLICANT DNA/RONHOVDE ARCHITECTS TOTAL AREA 1.41 ACRE PRINCIPAL ACCESS N.E. 4th STREET & BREMERTON AVE N.E . • EXISTING ZO 7-ING OP EXISTING USE OFFICE ' PROPOSED USE OFFICE ONLY - NO RETAIL COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN COMMENTS PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT TEE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF N.E . FOURTH STREET AND BREMERTON AVENUE N.E. '-.. . \ _ _ ._ 1,,, . . . L I LAND 1 ISE ELEMENT _ i ,_ :..-:„:. ._ ...__. -- ,___ ' 1.k,':'•I;,•. I __ . ',...;•.' •,'.'-f.- . Single Family ----- Commercial .....,...,.-",,, • . „.., -..,...s..:•.,..-.,•,!„, _.... r 0 .,,,,-.-----_..,. r•7'%.-). „,..":- % ((e ,S;:,"•,••-' q:•,`'c). -,-.,:.c,s--':?.•'-',1',`---1 :':- V ' ''''''‘ •c:-' c.--.F:44;•'-g-'0'''' ''''.";,'':IF-I; z'.;' ,- ..............• • 111114 i%Sii•,:S,-.....,:73.••-:::pc,-..rt.l.fr.•-•`.• ,‘;'. „.,,;'.f, ::::::::.:i:i::::::.:: Low Density •E.151 v ••,:,•;,,, •...r.--5 ,-/-a-s.„ ... ..;•,.'i'..; •;•';,,.....°. :..::. ....^:' ::.::.::.::::::::::::::: lilt1 1.8 . l'.el.:ef.....•• ,'Zr:‘;:; %.-'6f:?;0'.6 'H°. ,' *•.*i:X: Mil . • •',,r5,.',•,• ,,,r.:.:••'.f..:.r::':.„;.')•.11.. Multl-Family Office / Office Pa .0..... _, --•••-•-.::,-.!.:-,7,;,;.i-; 7.1 g:::.::UiR Medium Density ........ 81.0.9„........ .. •-.. •.,.. ....., ...,:::::::::::::::::: Public/Quasi-Pub :...- •,- ..,...: .::::::i*::::::::::::::::: Multi-Family ,....... 00.0000. ie:t* I a _ vi.,%\A 1.• ; • -r.--:. foeo..ii:i:M4a High Density %. Multi-Family Light Industrial• 5*A ••.. t:::4ItIVV:iitt• ‘ ,-vs •- MAIA•*,0 .0. • ti-:0 to <::::(-4,i,f;:;.:4‘;•.; p :6447.1 Recreation .4 6 • • • •• • Heavy Industrial e .t..-ik.)- • • • ,..,.,•,...,,,,, 1 -,r.„.•,r.:.;-, _____ -.,A --- .: 1111.:;',i c,.. ..-(4; :; Greenbelt ---------- Manufacturing Pa ., .. . • 1.._ ,.1t,(3‘Pooc).ol:\...._....00. 4 ...o0o.o.00. • Li MOC•P"' ' 2111_1_,.,*9..: .1 N\1\ . . ,1•;:,,:. i 1*.V.V. • j ;i' ell :::1 0°.' ••?. iilliiik masa• 77 ,11. • ••• ... ..rs, • • . - -, ,,, T 1,.. • . ,.,.,,.... .,• wilr Ili- - ^-c 1 000doo ..! -F-1 , ____....._ ••• • • •A..-„,...r ... .; .......00, ,,• , • • • • ,,,..- ••,.,. .,-, :i:i::. ''.1$11iiiiiirei- ilt um • , ........0 •,..,..• P•••••..... ---1 .i,I. ,...,::•,:::: .:.:i.i i.:•i.i.:.i.iriENefitil .:::::::1111ii. litillrillii • • • • • • \.....rr... *.•::: .: • • • • ',• • A';„- ,.;v.,:. .:.:.:.:....4).tiq.: El ..:i: ...415, - I, -It lel - ,...........0.:,,,,,, 4-,•. , .. ,. .IlLnfIntt .,:..9,. 14.1:10) •••,6 e•e\•e•e a ;4, ..;:g. :i:e.:i:ii*il ::::.., (rf •'',t°'- • :::::::::::::::: . • 1 ••••• •••••••.9. ...,,;. F :mi. •. Li__ •-•-• -• • °•••• e••• •••••'.. '! .:!ii..: intil• 1114 i...,:••• ke..••.,,t, L._-i • • • • • • • .,.. 1; :::i• ,,,,,, • • MEI • •• • • • • • ;., i •.'• ci.3711°. f )000 000 o • • • • • 63 • •• • •../' „ was .,...,.e. :000.: _ i ins ....7...., at3000o080.0.0000.0000 • • • .•:•:•'•:•:•:•:•:•:•. 'a• • • • • • ,.. • MI6 c.7X vo.pm roo .:•::::::::::K:::i*:kin_• -"'( 1 :1 • • • • • 4,, ,k • • • • • •i • -,,, %, ..0.0 et•°00,111,1 :. • • • le • --.,.',.. . ••• • • •, • (c.3. '. •••• ill .... : • • • • • :J.. ',..., 114 11.11All '!. ::::::: . .,.:2N.:::.;:::::M.:::E:ii:: ::.• •••• ,1 • • • • • 4?,... ii‘t Ilk id . . 1111 .::.:.. .:„....:.:.,...... Al.ark p • • • e • ',....., . 1 :.'k4P4'.11i. •••••••!•• ."! ..K .0.•.,§1, . '.' lank Nh. *pi i • • • • •/,'"6, 1 f;;.A X II iv',i• • ...$,• vfts, ;1 );:,:;::::1111 7.,==:11, i • a •:°0:::,:,.° :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::•:•:, . 4 00.0°.0.0°09; i::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.:.:.:.:.• : I 1 il • 1 ..,,i 4 i iiiii:i:i:ii::ii•••••" ..... I "ma • ...,,.s.. • • f iiiir ••• to r„ „ .....:.::: .:7.....•. ., lifilif•...••.0.. elmoill 1 iiiii ;I,Iff.limirlaw itito !I •• 4,4r IF .• ilfilii. 10 Arip .0..0.0.0. i:ii,o,',.• •i:::::::::::::::::::::::::.•••• ...:.::: .0083.00.000.00.0000000000 IL 011. ••• ••• . ......•.........• ••• ••••• . .........•........ •••• ••••• .. ............•..... a. elor• ,r,o,.,„, ,itible, •;, 'fi:.::::::':::::•••• ..:.:A:::.:::.::::::.i 0.00.00cfavoc,j,..0000.00.00.0.0.00.0. ::::::i.:::::::::::::iiiii.:...;.:.es ,.A::so:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::•:: _ .11 lir '',41:'...,..frr'.''':'`...!,,i •:6illiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiligl: °Pot:::::::::ce°§::::§§::::::::§t: :: ,,...--.v.:::;:::::: ::.::::::"" i.iii.ii"imii.:i :if:iiiii?.i:*:.::...... Im0, ,., ......_.0„„,„Forliii o 0 0 S'Ilkill 10E41 LV4Pi :.'. ..41w..f...00.,§, , 1.,.Offilll'a )0°00°00°/00°.°Y.0°10°1100°.°0-70070k 11', ::]1.::::::::: . "43,010„ily, ,.,,,f ,4 ;., 000t3.I oc,c,,),) 1!, '*::i:i:1*::::i*i:iiii:: °c°0°0°0°0°0°0° .0.0%%%VoU !• •ni•::. • '03 •'''i: OOP. SOSO VW4..V.1:ii,1 ...P.1. .•C i ' .°°°°° fy :::::::::::::::::::::......: 0000.000 00000000 .illiqf*' ...pf:y :•'.•4.'C.-.. •, i ••o o Do .,. .1; 0000000_o_o .4,. 1.:,.......2.....i.:::.: .,., o.o.o.o.o.o0000, ,.:..... x,....t.. %or, ....in .‘'),• ,0000 000 •••• • •• jliar0t. 1r.C''. ...3‘; 4........N. • 17jEk eA , iiiiiii:•.iiiin: ay,. .0• .'.!"V .... ' 1.- :q..f., :if:.n '°P•Vocg'° .:...1('i :::i::::::.:.::::::::: _ . •. 11 NM . 48. hiql 0.0.0... . •ik.,..1. • •:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:.:•:•:.:•: ---,witia." .,,.... ,taw :!;,1 ,. ::::::*;:::::::::::f. . 09, ,, •,, ., • ..• ,,„ ...,,..,.....,..0.:„..::.,..:..,„i.'r.._•••.i.'1), •:••?::•:::::•::•:•:•:'::'::':: •0111 •t-'...„ --gook.4,-,..4.,..4 4,,,A ,,, .....:.:.:.:.:...--....,,;•vr,-;;•...,.......:::-:•;,;:-:,,•„:,:;,-,..` •••••••••'•• 'll'I'Lk.f' ..ii'l;.•• ,i.'..,': . ,i_si rir1r t,1..1.‘;$? ..,e9f.' (,;,..11.,!?1, :'',..,• ...';...... ri'I".1:/..?,;•C,''':v, 'v./..."P".',.!:'.:.. ??..k, •::::.:.:.:.:.::::::: 1.00 ,,. 1': ,.,..,,,., 6,....,!.. .c.;,:4 !,T.';',),;•,1,, ,i";53;;-,,,..,IS:... .?"'.1-.5.......l.ci''''..:r7 c;ijc Pi, .....:.;••••••:.•:::•.::. 11101 • ,i;.! v5. \ ;:.,::.‘.'-,t,.?,::,•;:i4,,, 11111.41 .'1)j-q. ....:„:•-•••:,...::::r.)) .'1'•;i'''.1" • '.'.j)•••••••:'"''''I..5)3.6:.:?,!..2::!..'‘;..%,;:t.b......:,.._.,...:, ,,. ,..,._ .....,iss'.4.4•/;.:0 : c,(1,• .... •: •11/ '' ' ,,,,, l'Ae,•,-,c't^-4.0-Ct- ' .e0 3.,te;‘,,-^...Vri.,t(' .c-). •:-..-' -J c.• kr'1"..,,.t r: .("'';,A,"(i,..• Illii,. . 444411NNIAM ••,=,,„. ,t.,), c.p...11. .:.?...:.•;6,,s,•:,:.•J.:- •-.401r, 1:111;i• ., ••. .,,,..,,,..1)..(ro-. I, . . . r 4.:5N1;',Jr 48%, '. ;irf: '"c5e'' ''-‘..-: ,..,, .- •1. 1F 'co,..„...:..,;;!.;;.;,,. .,,, ,. ...,, ,ck.',,-..r.r.:,• ., 411Bor's .c..•se...if‘: .!:x clie:''..;',.'.,3, ' -.. p ....ei.,,c.,..;.•!..,.,...„3......,..,.w.... .,.%.114, _iit....c.•,..•rp 47.1•;;"•:::cci..4:17...,...-.'- q •*,,..,,,1.- ..,.•-•,.;„;,• .. ..-. - ----... _ ill. •.: s',?••,. ,,, „ ., .4., ,,,..,r, , .. 0.1...••\.,.. , -...,,4114 ••. .r. ••• ••,•'''''‘••• .''-•• -• .. ,:?;.)..,, 1.1;;.(P ,,'.4..,•„!••;.;:;.,•I'S'.::;..,!,,,i.,;:1,,t.„ ,„•:--, ,., :c.r.,...1,,tv: c.,frx).ta•re.6,4,:,,,s,r.,.4-•.'i \• ..0..., %00001 Kt li,-•,:'Ak't 0,':0'1.3,N •:.(‘''•1?•",, ;•• •r.z.. -- ..-.•.-,.__.. _,... ;tre,i);•,,re•LAI,'"•vr,-'ir, (''r-A•-1.(74' ,.,.,<,, :< 21.,. • ,.„,, , „-,- .,.c.,• ` . •.‘11.-_. c•o•1, < \ . , .(.1.<rt,ce i';',:....'-t.r'C'4-"•,,EK. .r: . 2\-I li-j,-,`,. .?,''''..`•'"ti.,"i%,!: .c- op0000• ,'('-.1.),•;0'..47,3:) .<-)0'" 'n•t Q. • -4r; ._,. -,..c r,• • • • 3,„ \;t tuff.iipt.cr.rtr..t.'t•cr....t,, • 0,),•'Z,..... •-.:.X:.i:::':•::.:.::i1 ,.:',,• ' ' ',;=.,i:.,....I,"F 4•:'•E•.V`.•,1.."..t;.-.-.042..:.e00`1d..,..* „,'•.•.‹.I-•I d•i,*:."t?.c1'•,fi:':i,i„..:,..""1'...:.f.r,,.+.1.,,%e,,.,,..'15;'.‘.....`;.(".1,1,,,'.,•,'.-,,.N.,i,!..,4,%cn.,.i4•c?''(:''„6'.,,,.0c•.6.,:.(..A;..v?.,.,,!,,..,...•.(-,',,->(-.,4'.:„,'.?(.;1,)..;•.,(•:.•,).;.,,-:,,.•;;;?;\.'.),O).'....a°t‘,.,-,:1..:7 1,:3::::..•'.,(,.s-i.,;,....!,.•,,>i,b_':•,;.".r2"..Ns.,rv.q(•")S.7p(‘...,/.4.,„.....47.;,,.:..4.:.1.s\C ----:..w. Y..:..'‘'i-'.•..,2• .:';,.•..e;••„c"c,.';!''",..;.`•r'.'..;•5,.•'1i"(.:71.‘•..q.i`"i,..e•.q''.',,.-:'A''N.t..:..?1'..',.4s.'2.1.';';•,0:,.";.q;,.;,•,6.;'•',A,.,‘ ,''',',*' , c& : , _;.'"r''.,'T".'3,'.,7 4..i,"e?'121:.,,.41...."0'',eC.-'''l'-.,-.7.t.,L•-,••.•I< ,•:•':1• ;,:."-.•,;•:s;.,; - •••••.••••• , ..<.,•1.,•.'.'‘,(••.'-',...,:-•(a. • , 0 at. • ^' ,•.. ..,1,.••11 ,k 2 lil)'. ..,V e0;,,....'".•.`,. ,t :.r.Z4.zr.:•:-,- '------.. ''''''''''"''''' • 1.1.." '.''' •'0,.•'‘.''. cie." ,.•,' . ii,2'fnl.1•. '• V r .1"'. 'a Cr.`'.‘i i: t"...‘t,tri..„)., ' '•':t'e:riir").04(1C-;;C:F.-Z.-. ;;i-f.,.'g.',r-C7-vt,':..::::i*i:?.i:::::::'::::i:i:i::. ' ".a, 1:,, :•,..[...13;:.•,,.. ',,.• 0 no •••'.` ' ' ' " '' . ,,. • ;,‘ .,- ••te-.b• •^'-' ' 4 A : -::`'.:(?,v,?:(:::(-fi.fii.ii(:!-,r,:ef•ii"..n.p;.c..*;.:5' . .. ,s,.•.',.P.^s-' °"°°° '1 s .*::i:::.:X::.:i::.::.:i::*i::::•.. ';....k‘^i 1:..,:..).v.-o..0., : , /,L,,,,, ..._ •..ce•f. ...(": ,;'.-4x,rep.V.:-.C..9•1:::::,:i. .:.:.:.:.:.: i.:::i.E;A:g.i .. k v •.:•:•:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::. • • .',,, -: 0 .„:„....::.:•:•:•:::::::.:...)4.P.;,;,'.!;6...;',,°',v.\ \ '---- ' '•''' • ;ic•itcr.s';'• ••''.‘,.e: .;:i:::. '•'•'..l': .o.00 ..., 000 .::;.4....i.•_ W..:';',....?•/....'''. '.0.:n... 000. 0-•\coo•r:,:;,,,...... ooc.o.o. 3.,•4),,‹. 000 :::i::i*';:i*i::*::i::'*:::i:::::i•,c, ;%•:-,.,..", •• -. ,L,c,(;0,. . ••--___\ 0 it.'t,,,-•• Lk, . .":*.ii:::.'1:.:::.:::::::g.::.::::::::::::: ‘.ei.,-,,-i';',•••?.,(V;0:0'0'''''•.;''!''' ' (,‘'30 .. \ \---'''' t.:0',.',Ito, ,, , - i/tj'AY:ie'''1•°.;''' '''`''''>.r.' p------:.1 -•::::::::;:::::iii:i:ii:. :';gviiiiiiriwma4 ,.0o0o.c:,?.•;*,.. '.',.8.c-• • kaz ket .,,e,:'•<•,.:4',:.,•.••'-',•v'•• ',:'f,'s„. ''....xii:iii:i.'::.. •AU.°• kit `'FicP0.•\) 3.":1"(1.k.l.°•-: ,;..... ,• • .•••1•.•(.p.1,,Q;Y.1,",•;.< ::::V.e •-:-:.(,..: 44) •000 '-',.:?!.:C!.':':.•:::;.;0.t.iii.i.:'39.311'Irl.1f.,-,:(1:';'):.:;.; -,C°' .. ...".:":.;'`''' 'I. 74?"•:::- 1". .o •o• o. ‘••'7;•).',3,:oi..;<-'. ..e• "''Le`-''•-- •,;•••':chi. "-LI- .• • .ia`"'Vz.,',";L 00 • 0000 Ifqr,:.,(2.1,.‘";;;?,j.ss,••;•N.),:,$,) ;(I):i'!,,'•qt0,•'63;0.,. '•`.':'-% '',tou.:' •,..'-',,it' ' -,,.,,tc.,,,,.,. '0 ':i:'*i*•::::::.. , .,'.: I 41,,,t!'.::,.., o o o •coo •,•,'..t 13 .1.•:.1",,,;',..yt•.-,' .'I',..". ;0,3 •0000 • 'trtr;;•il,'',*•;;;;%.',0:1!`05; ''' " •0.''L''. .,„,-.0)'‘.0',.';.•,.. ,0 .::'•:::*';:i:::::::„.. ,0 ..c„..t.... k •ii3 p.ii,.,,.i:Lt,10,,Vo°09DO I- ''.1:''L,'`•''.1.1:,`),...i.;4°L.i0.:t 't'‘,'. C'.• • 0.00. . %.,',..;q,.,,;>-;.‘).Q..,;. •a 7:.:a3...„c!,'•7 .,:. •'••t..•,', (.3 Po% .:•:•..::::::::::.:::... .t.,, •...p40,_,.:.0 0.0...00.. „.,0:.1,•...fi. ,(q^•,.•',". •L. i.):``.,',i'.70. •'• c. HMV-.•••:.1)..,•t • •... . :..,'i‘ •.,, i ci',^,;,.n pit': ,• '' .• .. 4•• . • O'....A-'.L.4i;••••`.• . ...... ... .. ..... I • - .-.. ' • •,,,,,.,...,,,„.:,.., 2 e.1. ........_.".‘ •0, •--0•• ., ,'%., .,1)•11 0):-.5• i' '':5'''-',./...:•..?1.j';.•,C;'.'''•.-.... '*qrillir.AMIII eLci-re-,.3 ti .:.•::::::::.:......:::::::.. .,13 . 44. Its . . . .., - • O00000 '''.}.',...(0.1?-,4,3'1 .,,,-1 , -,:,..s, •;,,..,.,, -.."'di.' ..'V((,,.:::::: nnn nn0 •r•!. I / i •00000• • • •0.7 2.•0 ',....'0 0.,.....•2 •,...../...- r.i...r.r. ^).`-': • •:.::3::3:: ,U00 0.0080 re0o0 00 i -.1.•,.). I. n ....001313'Cr. 000000 , '':)....;0.1.7....,,,r. t.,.;:•-&-;41',•1!.R.i•...rj;u'•eq.-'''-‘5 •'•• . • l'.(3,°•;:'•.' ,.'''.',".•i,..C,•,c-•••••1"•'0•'.e,,;•'!? ',.- •00000. •. ..e."• t(). •• . t A iit! ..• .. •5,0. tc:•'• o°o%°o°o.I 471. I •000000.• •O00000... 000000 "••.,0 • •.`? 000000 • N.."1* • ••., , - - ......00..• N1/4,...„.....,timemilk ..,,:...),:.,.,..„1.4.,, INF •,(g.u.n..1.2.'e • 7.:p :Iva. ':3.7r.11 ;'•''..); ....m.o.. *Or. 00000. VA.°00.0.0• '..•' . t... • ,, . r,.;. ..; ..• \ \ . ..,.. . ...,.. . ,. •.,. • .00000p000 000000000 .00*000000 1111110°0°0000 0000f .;I'S )0000 -• •.', 0000, f.) 4,.:00000000000000 .. ..e.. 000000009,..0.1•00( , ••10 :C00000000tt 00 I ..••0000 •. 00 k.. 100000 00( , •, , . ,,,,ii..:,•,,,,,„(,,,,.; •.00. •0.0• • 00000 , ......0% 1 •••• ---i-- CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO. : ECF-121-88 APPLICATION NO(S) : R-121-88, SA-121-88 PROPONENT: Old National Bank DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Applicant seeks to: 1) rezone 1.41 acre area site from OP (Office Park) to B-1 (Commercial) ; 2) obtain site plan approval to construct an approximately 5, 200 square foot addition to the existing Old National Bank building. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Southwest corner of N.E. Fourth Street and Bremerton Avenue N.E. 0 LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Community Development Department Planning Division The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43 . 21C. 030 (2) (c) . Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-2822 (D) Renton Municipal Code (see attached sheet) . These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340 (2) . Because mitigation measures have been imposed, the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fifteen (15) days from February 27 , 1989 . Any interested party may submit written comments which must be submitted by 5: 00 p.m. , March 14 , 1989, in order to be considered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period will commence following the finalization of. the DNS. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee c/o Don Erickson, Zoning. Administrator Planning Division Community Development Department . 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 PUBLICATION DATE: . February 27, 1989 DATE OF .DECISION: February 22, 1989 SIGNATURES: ,,Ken Pdyberg ='l Acting Cvmmu it Devei ' me t Lyn Gu tmann Y pr n Director Pu l ' c orks Director REVIEWING DEpf RT NT/D; SION: j ty.4keggAv_y_L___________ APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED Any development and/or construction shall comply with current Ordi- nances. Fire and Building Codes and A second means of approved access is required. Fire� partment access roads/lane minimum width 20'; minimum height 13' 6". Yes_ No s shall be paved Preliminary fire flow calculations show a fire flow of required. �� °O is required. ---------- hydrants with minimum flow of Primary hydrant is required to be within ���'"`8pm each Secondary hydrants are required to be within ° feet of the structure. structure. goo • feet of the An approved automatic sprinkler system is required to protect the total structure. Yes _ MI fire department access roads are to be paved and installed prior to construction. Yes No 0.II fire hydrants are required to be installed and approvedYew No__ prior to construction. Yes____ No Ar,,e, . /‘ , /96e9 • REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: <3o'rm WA-( APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED A70 O�J JC.c4" .a r\ �o r-2 o D,_-1-e_yNk-'1 b'N r%CCP')1 s�-o r,r•� ii s y r��Ie4.s . T 15 - �� Lc , c., ?foPk 1o"t` 1 l 1- �-4-)OY\ O-C -sk0 Wc.1--e-0 - ,,,I - posyibie- r? 4�i DATE l 1 3/r2 SIGNATURE DIRECTOR OR AUTHO TZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISIONN: / j,t/c ",e i,y APPROVED 1- APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED (V D (Sib j-ec haf-c. �D r ,?'G1-p,e, ro u t d ed : 1, -clj�r. 7`_ . .sT4 �"s �a 6..c.. alb/a�e1 ,4 C, S/ cl�IL z . ier'�� -. ,-�o/n 71 �r/✓ O/31 /V. . ¢Tt �:, w,// 3. A !l u 4/die - % h/ A� 4 s a /4Gudi S d4-�.c, G1a/i C1�e_tek 1'i/-.1-, 4 eti7 wa71 -- ---��� _ 2a2f nn mr /— /a - �T�i ,•+ 11.1111.11i L kI1cl'llisI 1IIi1V1SIOtI. ` APPROVED _APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS A( NOT p k zoNE mil m• uninyA151 �'.2/2 7o X$3.464t_ t73700 .1407"/ A"-.CS /D 7 LATE COMERS AGREEMENT-E 7'R I YES . NOW /t/C/711 Of e,A/7b�t/ LATE COMERS AGREEMENT-S';.'�t • A/O I �dv 2 thP pA SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CIS'..^.2 -l':^r, it fD ��Q PeasL SYSTEM DEVELOPMEf T C:' :' o.';:�� V� (i / ) "---� SPECIAL Y, .44/so.FT e) 64 4DODR7- OD ASSESSMENT G":1 c:.:- '7.-MEN 4.• - SPECIAL ASSESSMENT G".'''•' APPROVED WATER PLAN ( (`���04i°"'u �QGa)uatdo APPROVED SEWER PLAN lei MA oft M 4-i (3IL 1Zeat, To s°Luis rr 1 it rt. Ft-ow R.Kau 4 It.t.-si;.-.TS' APPROVED TIRE HYDRANT Li ATI01_ ,. rttt 1,007) tift.' ' . Q r*- s0r.1 2 - ' .0 BY FIRE DEPT. . , FIRE FLC"1 ANALYSIS 11111Mang . MaQadtzK S l:,f - F. D. g-g-6 S • � 1 SIGNATURE OF D REA. REPRESENTATIVE OR OR .0 HORIZED DATE Z7 REV. 6/88 /- /9-J7Q' ' /-zo-S, •a` ' REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: 2 APPROVED 4APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS . _ NOT APPROVED . 0 1.. t.Coviri 1v1EO j f-,cZooc FROm 0 To Ts- I .-� L rw It ilcfzzA I ►v ER or j 1 Nu3Nita 14 495-The S l4O JL L vppt,6Yhov-1610 Uv' rl f STR.150 - OS o I�r Tge �IS7'ING. TIC Ncork 3 Ronil ri1 i To �IAo , "G�-� . a rniiI0.7/\(I0 6\ii.5ri )0(p(.)1i5 rIIz- rheS LU t_‘Ive J 9"I I�l/ )Iv vo Ic13 LQ l-}� L�;G&SS�R �I� 7 IZG eI`�7 liwy GNATURE OF ECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE DATE (� 7 I S I Cl RE . 6/88 . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: U C. APPROVED APPROVED WITH .CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED dZLA I LO r-ti G.s anus'r >'')-1 -1- .i3,C C' /d c c lc. . --bv&,e- .N--r -t-I...1-1 S C%->-�tG� C 4/(1,—,sm—. .__.--SIGNATURP — •DT Fmrnr nn T m .- TT . -T ..------ PnTF — / ? ( (W r� gdx,z-nn-I1ewc.coilv144APPROVED 0.r9 APPROVED WITH CONDIqS NOT APPROVED • • • • • • • DATE SI NATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE • REV. 6/88 • • COMMENTS: Lonl Ter _17)1v-vmki 1 rr--z., Es-/ 5;/6., ow;;rietij (A" ;,/ co or re hew s: e 1)61, 7- , no'f- cf 7,-Ap ovl-c,ile roil-re'c •cf•fcw€71-/foo fr v15 Vi If b-e vyj ; ; r vio c (e6r Aovvi, /. ,f 11,0 vc 1),(20-.1 ./ f YC,112-fic We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are • where additional information is needed to(7) • properly assess this proposal. • (1' // 1 9 (2 Signature/of Director or-Authorized Representative Date . Rev. 6/88 . e, • . Cro-s'-'-' • tr 0 vri (rifs r r will 911e• • e21 d icq Fc•‘4,1) , cr pi . 1 tqr • / •••) )1' 1 , vie v lc 10 bv; /(iv ;"I: Pr'.‘ • / 1 1C' //5 r ,› - • c I ( \ is /0 . wheice are. • I/ r (2,y I.) vcic i or ' 0 e TOr"). A fle..1 roo-r cgs( ' 12,c usco . • rkd • -r Pif's - • f..1 eqvv .„ , • il (rft; 1). a tic a l t, • - ,r•• 2 fo (ricc 6Cie (°1 (7v. • • / ../ • 4? re (c)I If e reo) c, . CYl• -•ro . • • . , • r. c vt, ; hoe- t„,e ..oce 570/. / 19V;I.ci •• • DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED MITIGATION MEASURES PROJECT: OLD NATIONAL BANK ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF-121-88 APPLICATION NUMBER: R-121-88, SA-121-88 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: APPLICANT SEEKS TO: 1) REZONE 1.41 AREA SITE FROM OP (OFFICE PARK) TO B-1 (COMMERCIAL) ; 2) OBTAIN SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT AN APPROXIMATELY 5,200 SQUARE FOOT ADDITION TO THE EXISTING OLD NATIONAL BANK BUILDING. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF N.E. FOURTH STREET AND BREMERTON AVENUE N.E. RECOMMENDATIONS: ISSUE A DETERMINATION OF NON- SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. That the applicant be required to develop a landscaping plan in order to provide a visual buffer, and a light and glare buffer between the site and neighboring properties, subject to the approval of the. City s landscape planner; 2 . That the applicant submit a plan for traffic mitigation, including the following measures, subject to the approval of the Traffic Engineering Division. a. A joint access easement for shared access to N.E. - 4th Street from the driveway at the seut)ieast corner of the site. Note: Such easement must be duly recorded with King County with copies sent to the City. b. Signage and striping at the entrance/exit of the N.E. 4th Street driveway which designates right-in/right-out turns only. c. A plan for providing pedestrian linkage (e.g. raised sidewalks, painted crossing pathways) from the bank to the parking area and the adjacent public right-of-way to ensure safe pedestrian passage. 3 . That the applicant voluntarily bond for an amount of $30, 000. 00, for their share of future traffic mitigation measures that are being identified in a Traffic Benefit Zone for this transit corridor. This contribution is recommended to be in the form of a bond valid for at least a period of five (5) years. Note: In the event that the proponent' s fair share of support for traffic mitigation is determined to be less than $30, 000. 00, a refund will be provided. In no case will the proponent be required to contribute more than $30, 000. 00 Old National Bank Page 2 • 4 . That the applicant submit the following plans for approval by the Public Works Department prior to implementing construction activities in order to mitigate impacts from those activities to the site and the neighboring properties: a) an erosion control plan; b) a plan for wheel-washing of construction vehicles prior to their entry onto the roadway in order to prevent the tracking of dirt and debris off-site; c) periodic watering down of the site to control dust; d) a plan for haul routes and hours of operation to limit traffic impacts also ' subject to approval by Police Department and Traffic Engineering.; and e) a $2 , 000. 00 bond to enable street clean-up. Note: Staff may wish to recommend a restrictive covenant to require site plan review for any and all future development on this site in order to ensure that activities undertaken on the property are compatible with other neighborhood developments. mmdoc - . . • ' . . . . .- . • • . - - • • . OM/RONrt3VDE • . . . - • . • . • ARCIATECTS , . . . , 1048 W.JAMS ST,SUTE 102 . • • • . Katt WASI443TON 9E03;2 • PHOW(208)854-5010 • . . • . . . • • . • mu cunt.,.orrful. ..\•••••1.....al .ar•_.w„.. ....-' • ••••=•••••••••••ad cao ofr I . . gairammoor - . ---'.... • -<•• A. . __ \ r . • • • . ---- • . • • _OFFICE_ • ; \ .rkant List . • • 1 ' -' '- -.-j4e".1 •• "',00.„.0.--- ..207••••r.A.P•1•16 . . .eta,ra,„er.c. • I • • '-.-:_f.': - BUILDING " nottE 1 111111111: - ___ • PIN.r,114.1,CEPINI ' ,C•cao0,121 21...1.4,5 iltrinvf. E••••,./6 0.-7:14,..D4O• • Re.%covra.hb IA•Pfe.X 6..04.h6 ) -ILI WY f.4111.4e.- EXPANSION L: ._... .-,,,,,...,...,.. • • Pt.s-fras Aceps.o.of I ry•flos,mew I sad taNgat Fix*tree I 7 ...-......f.er' .-Ye'''') . . .71,..o,1 1V-1%.di,111.4,212,NO 1 P- V21•1:47 421512TY .C1b);117,....7.12.-- grew fat:Ar./13 Tfil A / ff-x......nvregzo•Ireit.16C a — ( ',,,(-. . •-riT,IND. . I 0-',il • 2D.r....,••ro‘ ui U_L i ' ( ..l•••••.42 erALL.,/, I , • I . IV-Ara,co-ta•st.,ess. s, 1 ' i er.r.use 042...vc.:_ I(il • . • ..,, 0 Zil...M.X•L.1.11:0 . Kr-e1A•11'.,Cle• : .. & IN. ,--Ir•-.''• It..? ''"----- 'Ar...ii4. ____--1 <3 - • $IQ I 6 r ...:•,.......z; 1:r-:171----7 '"".".- - n •.:8 €1-1..12DOCINVPRI'II.PM veszr'—"Ir-is•tsf,e.16. • a • i n ' p,..:=06.....4.4,..7..v=•-ge.vor.,00. • ..t i.k•;• • . • • . . f 1 amnia 6....:42 I ..,• . • (,.,vlilomt.rel Pla.KUNI?alto:Wm 6.4.4.pr, ....0, A• ' :: , "r"''',', '':cc:ma-mg S113.1Nrvi - 0'.: • , , _ •ne.e.mr•PIELM 6.1772 Is-at%awe..um .• ati4 isf....si • .....-.-- . f ....•••••Pr.. , ••..c•••••• ' Ei-1"..14 , 4.4 sfs.ris.saa 024517..053:en - :. , • i ••••••••/•••17.117.6••• I 1 r:••704:-...,..—............2C2•CIH it,r..<4:. .1 . . 1 . ' . ....•c... . i 1 - . •:. ..........t... . • .........re: 6.,..xv....264. ...101CJI•E ...G., '..s..o-ks?...ss; •••,eE • e - ee-•••••••10-1 • i ' ' ,.••• i L...1. Mg 4410f.a•rf!et. Ce.-ioot .' ,.,, . - . . . • • -.-01e-fe,ofs• A s 1,..0iCerrt0'. 1.-'...zr.ICt . . -1 • • i .• • , . . . . LAkIDY/09...tl :•'S eX:7-',....10- . eillu.. • . ' • 4...4.tiTV'''''' •- Aom e" opri -+ , .--7-':,;-. ."'-40? 74..7. 1 • • • • _ • ........1 ao..12 4.1.•...E.a...Avon ' ..--• 2 . . .41111112:2311232SM"lag=i3212=1"\ •-‹ - . . . , . . /KW • .-----..- 2'1'.6 - •• ..........••••,../----01....„... • I .r•••!..1 I ........•••.*...so— • ...- o•4 • . • I - . • 1 . , . I - , ..... • . . ,.•\ .. ....,01•••••• I . • .-- ----——.--- -'----. . ...- .-.---.—.--..--- • LA,"4Vg FLU./ • . ..i . •• • . . . • • ......., . , •011,1S•. .. . . . 11••••••••• . • . /AN ME PLAN LAMSCAPING PLAN .... i.... 1......... . • • • 17,Ep.•20 . - I I , I - - i .. . ' • as lea. ono ma... 1:••••.7 , . 10' . . •---__......._ ..— . - . .• 1 . . . DRIA/RON1-10VDE ARCHITECTS 1)j 1048 W.JAMES ST,SUITE 102 KENT,WAS-NTON 98032 PFICte(206)854-5010 -_--. - .-(5..,•&1.1)— -. - - ---------- — '4•7•.+1-0••••••_ N c.,les,•1:-... .•60E.Q....•-••••••.-. 1C0‘.0 0.0. I '-•••15-14.1.---• -— galet :5:1711 c.v.. I ...: ....---.---- •te<>",•.---- • 1 7 I •••,—, ii . OFFICE f r. -20.- • . . _ ...., 5 BUILDING ...•••• E 1 I • EXPANSION 1 1 u _..1._ •....... to• I., . .. ' __._ P .17 att1, f .d ...f -........ - ..- 7 . ri _1 i .,..,........s-..,.., , 1 i • .1: ; i 3! - ! , ',—,2,70aa • a I,--—-•••, .=_- .--— - -------• --- 7 i.T! i • ;I „.____.--._;____,,L.,L__...... —___,. ,,, n . I s -v, I 1-i" :1 g 1 ....5 o•504,43' I ri ' wiri.,.•lagave••12 1 1 • .4 1 1 1 1 ,-' 1 • r 1 . ii I 7 : I•-• f • 1,.-...•-•.••••••-n...• ; b --• • ,,,,,,,P. ,___—] . 4.0,•0.iv.... ! •as•ra•••••-••••••• L . . 1 .1.:, ;1 7i,i ...core...TO.5.• I 0 . CI.- . ; 'Al ... ., ! I. . g I i. ' 1 I I 1 1 I I • • ..L--a..,. • .2..... , • .ii .....C....,dr...-....,.. f 503.2-,Ge r ....1.0 coto....0.•!•C • I 0..••••,•••••••-,—41 I".7•••••5”014 ...mg c••,e.., 6 50v.. '''..i'.-..-7.-.• :., ...7-'-' . 3 1 ••••Cam.. [. 6.,s PLAki 1) , 4-• • • 2.5.E.. •••56.006 B.5 • . 1.•••••• ..... I...• I p•••••••1••eA WE. PLAN ISKII .12CY . . 1 .0..- I 1• II AN P••ee 7 Won NY. 0••••Ow 74- el..e. ,--. .... s, C...WA. C. t1.-121-5.5. . I . —"go- ..• • . . . . * i .• 1 s . :1 • • . DRIVRONI-10VDE . ARCI-IITECTS . rc.....z.i....z.i 1048 W.JAMES ST.SUTE 2102 KENT.WASI-NGTON 9803 ___ -_ ___.... tr : ...9ig-3 -- F1-10NE(206)854-5010 _ ____...______ .._ •— - . _ . . _ •-- ._. ---- - .. -....=- -.....=,_:..._. .1 2. _=__ 1 = ••==.,_._-,._ II Et. '_' .___ 1-1 .--'' --.= _ •— =— :-----_, . -- i• ! 1. 01 1 = —,— . ._..__ . __zi 0 . — aw....11.11 ea.....6 b[2.,•!• E.K.C1.03 2,1..=?J.E '.:6.1 011,41CMIE NORTH ELEVATION OFFICE . 1,,...-0. • BUILDING —:.„,17 •. ./mc.ove,.E.,g....,_a'..-.1_.„z•.._,.,._1--,-. 10,•. — -......___1 _4- .. . • . ::. _ 1 . EXPANSION N . 4 • ....i.r..,..-:-'..1 v,d../6••••.,0-0..L •D‘6-se 0,13C.V.YE pi ISOUTH ELEVATION . 1 i 7 i . J i . • _i _ ——• _ „...._ _ _ ,•_=•_, .-----. .. _._, . ._-__- - - =--f_- 1 1 , _ I • .-I- ;,i------r._ _ 7 = =:- '.7.- -- = _2— ___,•,' .-^,--13 2C-4,- • —.:44.•£.-EEZ L-...,) 1 WEST la.D/ATKDIN :,C" • _ . I - -- - ---- - . _ = .....,,...... ----. . r ' - — -- — = . . _ 1 N .. I ,... - ____1 1--t- 1,g.,..\,-j,- • 1 ....... 1 1 1 -___... • . . - , -717-7".t.! j . .. SW PON ,Nrecepten i ...J... ...,.e....5 , , .EAST ...Z.:L:5:.s ''''''-'• ELEVATION • ib:.'-o - . • . • .••. --..--... • AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 4t6 day of M'7;- , 1988, I deposited n the mails of the UnitedOStates a sealed envelope containing �r.F. R- 05 A-- 6 documents. This information was sent to: NAME: BEPRESENTING: • t� -vm's Q.L.,cewvatI �V�.rNSe-t Siu�.re� j&qr� • • SIGNED BY: SUBSCRI 7‘ DAriND SWORN to before me this 17 day of , 198 i 41i 46,Z4A) ' s Notary Pub1 ' i1 ani(for t e State of V;Washir: .on, residing a , the_reih.,�� Project Name and Number: plc` NllcriaA TtAAL 5A - la.l - 64 lam, 6 .1F ./ / NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON APRIL 11, 1988, AT 9: 00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITION: OLD NATIONAL BANK ECF; R; SA-121-88 Applicant seeks . to: 1) rezone 1.41 acre site from OP (Office Park) to B-1 (Commercial) ; 2) obtain site plan approval to construct an approximately 5,200 square foot addition to the existing Old National Bank building. The property is located at the southwest corner of N.E. Fourth Street and Bremerton Avenue N.E. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Community Development Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON APRIL 11, 1988, AT 9: 00 A.M. TO . EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. Published: MARCH 31, 1989 ti OF REDO rICE5 TICE • ..,.... ,.., f'�i.1. • U .JL '® g .:,:,...,,.; it. 9.0 ••:1 i 5. oq 0e 4rFp SEPtEM i I .••i •``•` ''. `` '` ` City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner . will hold a • HEARING .... . :.: .;. :, .:,. :: • ,. ., `I`l•y. `,,' I n f'4•`-`±• : 4 CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL ' • .Y ON APRIL 11, 1989 BEGINNING AT 9o0A.M. P.M. `=<: ECF-121-88, R-121-88, SA-121-88 '? 7 CONCERNING: OLD NATIONAL BANK • t • +: i APPLICANT SEEKS TO: 1) REZONE 1.41 ACRE SITE FROM OP (OFFICE PARK) TO B-1 (COMMERCIAL) ; 2) OBTAIN SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO #• CONSTRUCT AN APPROXIMATELY 5,200 SQ.FT. ADDITION TO THE EXISTING V OLD NATIONAL BAN! B.U.I LDING. -- i , f,/t 4al'A •w I LJ'I 1' t' ��aj�- I1 Ie11 . _ • , _ I , • ! "• '(; lj II_1 I li_.2� \---1 i ;t}III°I. .JI � �i•��.. ���t,4 ' I ;.t• i I•!.!!I•i•�:.�:' '-- I • •'; .:111 a' • I1 �\ • .•.,11.:. . II ,,,� �. I- 1 ,-.!..1.11. •I. ,S..;.;:.1.5.;" 1-.1t.1.11):, . G 11 • I I G ' I •t'.I.• . 'Pi 1 ,.:�.I' •`` :f{ `I$lt) c d t.••j l'!11_I nr.� !sY —_ - =i ' .. .1• �'il,_ _.I j I ,.'I I, ri.r - ' ;f,•� --1.-rrI—'-!-r-•_— �'_1IL I I I tIIr._ ;•;,• •il,.; ,. !,' •. _ 1 ' Tr - „. •: �. 1 ,: 1.1..,_. . �IIW i• 7111.yi • , ,„:., •• ,,,,.,.,, ., J rr —I— \TLL II�! • • .... I--_ ' 7 �� ,i�. {jll i�; 1 L,. , 77:[;,' , rl 'l _I tl�-� t I I Ir "1 _. — -�;--;— •'t`,a,....,1. ' I1:.•l.II ' �•Ir,k I 1,r;"•i - .. .I I . . . � I , ` I . ....t- ., GENERL. ' LOITION AN -! /0 — ) 11 PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF N.E. FOURTH STREET s e% sa AND BREMERTON AVENUE N.E. :l , FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON. BUILDING&ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 t s I`; : :' <' THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT :._ _ ....4 PROPER AUTHORIZATION • CERTIFICATION - • I , 0E1912 T . LH ID , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT Ilimec Cs) COPIES —OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN ( 3 ) CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON OR NEARBY THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY ON 1l/ r(cH- gal roc/ ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing • , on the �7441- SIGNED : i.)e_AiLif: LAihC L day of 16189 J < d • q$ CITY OF RENTON "LL DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor PLANNING DIVISION • March 28, 1988 Torjan Ronhovde 1048 West James #102 Kent, WA 98032 RE: ONB Office Building Expansion NE 4th Street (SE 128th Street) and Bremerton Avenue NE (136th Avenue SE) ECF; R; SA-121-88 Dear Mr. Ronvovde: A public hearing before the City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner has been scheduled for April 11, 1988. The public hearing commences at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you before the hearing. If you have any questions, please call 235-2550. Sincerely, Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE:m jp cc: Dennis Dochnal - Sunset Square Management 2006 Redmond Ave. NE Renton, WA 98056 . _. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 • 4'$ ittiE CITY OF RENTON ma DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor PLANNING DIVISION March 16, 1988 • Torjan Ronhovde 1048 West James #102 Kent, WA 98032 RE: Old National Bank NE 4th & Bremerton ECF; R; SA-121-88 Dear Mr. Ronhovde: This letter is to inform you that the comment period has ended for the Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated for the above referenced project. -1 No comments were received. The Committee's determination is final and`may be appealed to the City's Hearing Examiner no later than 5:00 p.m. on April 3, 1989. Any appeal must state clearly why the determination should be revised and must be accompanied by a non- refundable $75.00 filing fee. If you have questions or desire clarification of the above, please call our office at 235-2550. For the Environmental Review Committee, Sincerely, ,' 1 Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE:mjp cc: Dennis Dochnal Sunset Square Management 2006 Redmond Avenue N.E. Renton, WA 98056 • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION Environmental Review Committee • . Renton, Washington • The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated for the following projects under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code.. The following Applicants have completed a mitigation process: OLD NATIONAL BANK ECF; R; SA-121-88 Applicant seeks to: 1) rezone 1.41 acre site from OP (Office Park) to B-1 (Commercial) ; 2) obtain site plan approval to { construct an approximately 5,200 square foot addition to the existing Old National Bank building. The property is located at the southwest corner of N.E. Fourth Street and Bremerton Avenue N.E. MOSQUITO ABATEMENT (CITY OF RENTON)' ECF-002-89 Applicant seeks approval for a Mosquito Abatement Program (1989-1993) over 65 acre area of the Panther Creek Wetlands. Location: Panther Creek Wetlands located east of SR 167 between I-405 and S.W. 43rd Street. Properties include those under private ownership and those under public ownership. Further information regarding this action is available in the Community Development Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. This Determination is FINAL. There is a 14 day appeal period which will end at 5:00 PM on April 3 , 1989. Any appeal of this decision may be made to the City's Hearing Examiner, Municipal Building, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, Washington. An appeal must state clearly, in writing, why the Determination should be revised and must be accompanied by a non-refundable $75.00 filing fee. Published: March 20, 1989 1: :j; '', :,,,,1 N OT IC E • I I . ENVIRONMENTAL % : . DECLARATION 1Y ': ,'a APPLICATION NO. ;,:$ ECF-121-88, SA-121-88, R-121-88 ir;.:.: +` APPLICANT ``' OLD NATIONAL BANK `' PROPOSED ACTION �: APPLICANT SEEKS TO: 1) REZONE 1.41 ACRE SITE iit FROM OP (OFFICE PARK) TO B-1 (COMMERCIAL) ; 2) OBTAIN SITE PLAN , APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT AN APPROXIMATELY 5,200 SQ.FT. ADDITION TO �.y 1i SOUTHWEST CORNER OF N.E. FOURTH STREET AND BREMERTON AVENUE N.E. :1:1 ' POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS L 1, fii OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. ,' .`' ';°' " , THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (E.R.C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE , -; PROPOSED ACTION , s. rg DOES DO ES OES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. isJ '. ''a AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL WILL NOT ,,j ` :<''!I BE REQUIRED. '1 is'; THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS F`•" PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. • ti COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY . AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER '1 BY 5:00 P.M., APRIL 3, 1989 . • h FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON • 1 PLANNING DIVISION AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION. CERTIFICATION JERRY F. LIND THREE (3) I , , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE (3) CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON OR NEARBY THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY ON MARCH 16, 1989 ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public n and for the State of Washington • residing in(4••.� ►J , on the _4 SIGNED : OP . �v)( day of { 7 ti ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION APPLICATION NO. ECF-121-88, SA-121-88, R-121-88 • APPLICANT OLD NATIONAL BANK PROPOSED ACTION APPLICANT SEEKS TO: 1) REZONE 1.41 ACRE SITE FROM OP (OFFICE PARK) TO B-1 (COMMERCIAL) ; 2) OBTAIN SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT AN APPROXIMATELY 5,200 SQ.FT. ADDITION TO { SOUTHWEST CORNER OF N.E. FOURTH STREET AND BREMERTON AVENUE N.E. POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (E.R.C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NtDOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL WWILL NOT- BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., APRIL 3 , 1989 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION AT 2 3 5-2 5 5 0. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION. i • CITY OF RENTON era DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT • Earl Clymer, Mayor PLANNING DIVISION February 28, 1988 Torjan Ronhovde 1048 West James #102 Kent, WA 98032 • Re: ONB Office Building Expansion, N.E. 4th Street (S.E. 128th Street) and Bremert on Avenue N.E. (136th Avenue S.E.) ECF; R; SA-121-88 { Dear Mr. Ronhovde: This letter is to inform you that the Environmental Review Committee completed their review of the environmental impacts of the above referenced project. The Committee, on February 22, 1989 decided that your project may be issued a Determination of Non- Significance-Mitigated with the following conditions: 1. That the applicant be required to develop a landscaping plan in order to provide a visual buffer, and a light and glare buffer between the site and neighboring properties, subject to the approval of the City's landscape planner; 2. That the applicant submit a plan for traffic mitigation, including the following measures, subject to the approval of the Traffic Engineering Division. a. A joint access easement for shared access to N.E. 4th Street from the driveway at the southeast corner of the site. Note: Such easement must be duly recorded with King County with copies sent to the City. b. Signage and stripping at the entrance/exit of the N.E. 4th Street driveway which designates right-in/right-out turns only. c. A plan for providing pedestrian linkage (e.g. raised sidewalks, painted crossing pathways) from the bank to the parking area and the adjacent public right-of-way to ensure safe pedestrian passage. 3. That the applicant voluntarily bond for an amount of $30,000.00, for their share of future traffic mitigation measures that are being identified in a Traffic Benefit Zone for this transit corridor. This contribution is recommended to be in the form of a bond valid for at least a period of five 5( ) years. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 Torjan Ronhovde ONB Office Building L;, iunsion February 28, 1989 Page 2 Note: In the event that the proponent's fair share of support for traffic mitigation is determined to be less than $30,000.00, a refund will be provided. In no case will the proponent be required,to contribute more than } $30,000.00 4. That the applicant submit the following plans for approval by the Public Works Department prior to implementing construction activities in order to mitigate impacts from those activities to the site and the neighboring properties: a) an erosion control plan; b) a plan for wheel-washing of construction vehicles prior to their entry onto the roadway in order to prevent the tracking of dirt and debris off-site; c) periodic watering down of the site to control dust; d) a plan for haul routes and hours of operation to limit traffic impacts also subject to approval by Police Department and Traffic Engineering; and e) a $2,000.00 bond to enable street clean-up. Note: Staff may wish to recommend a restrictive covenant to require site plan review for any and all future development on this site in order to ensure that activities undertaken on the property are compatible with other neighborhood developments. Because the Environmental Review Committee imposed specific mitigation measures rather 3 than issue a Determination of Significance, there is a required fifteen (15) day comment period during which comments are solicited from various agencies, jurisdictions or individuals who may have an interest in the Committee's decision. The comment period will end at 5:00 PM on March 14, 1989. Following the end of the comment period, the City will • finalize it's Determination unless comments received require a reevaluation. Following the finalization of the Determination, there is a required fourteen (14) day appeal period. In addition, by the end of the comment period, we should be able to establish a tentative public hearing date before the Hearing Examiner should a public hearing be necessary. { If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call our office at 235- 2550 and ask for Lenora Blauman or me. 1 For the Environmental Review Committee, Sincerely, itudi) _ Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE:mjp cc: Dennis Dochnal 1 Sunset Square Management 2006 Redmond Ave. N.E. Renton, WA 98056 1 1 i►mETR® Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle Exchange Building • 821 Second Ave. • Seattle,WA 98104-1598 March 7, 1989PLP,i t��;i U;'"1 !��V 01 CITY f�Lf's1ON (�) MAR 8 1989 0 Environmental Review Committee U c/o Donald K. Erickson ly Zoning Administrator Planning Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Determination of Non-Significance File No: ECF-121-88 (ON B ) Dear Environmental Review Committee: Metro staff has reviewed this proposal and anticipates no significant impacts to its wastewater facilities or public transportation services. Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment. Sincerely, Gregory M. Bush, Manager Environmental Planning Division GMB:wsg4491 NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION REnm WASHINew The Enviroo nmental Review C Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non- Significance-Mitigated for the following pro- jects under the authority of the Renton being first duly sworn on oath states Municipal Code. The following Applicants that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the have completed a mitigation process: OLD NATIONAL BANK (ECF; R; SA- 121-88) Applicant seeks to: 1)rezone 1.41 acre site VALLEY DAILY NEWS from OP(Office Park)to B-1 (Commercial); • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition 2)obtain site plan approval to construct an Dailyto newspapers six (6) times a week.That said newspapers the approximately Old National0 square foot addition g. publishedthe existing Bank building. are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six The property is located at the southwest months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed And published corner of N.E. Fourth Street and Bremerton Avenue N.E. in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King MOSQUITO ABATEMENT (CITY OF County,Washington.The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal RENTON) (ECF-002-89) newspaper order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for Applicant seeks approval for1a Mosquito by P g Abatement Program (1989-1993) over 65 King County. acre area of the Panther Creek Wetlands. Location: Panther Creek Wetlands located east of SR 167 between 1-405 and S.W.• The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the Kent Edition 43rd Street. Properties include those under Renton Edition X , Auburn Edition (and not in private ownership and those under public ownership. supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers Further information regarding this action during the below stated period.The annexed notice a _ is available in the Community Development Department, Municipal Building, Renton, P uu 1 i C Notice Washington, 235-2550. This Determination is FINAL. There is a 14 day appeal period was published on March 20 , 1989 R5 2 0 7 which will end at 5:00 PM on April 3, 1989. Any appeal of this decision may be made to the City's Hearing Examiner, Municipal Building, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, Washington. An appeal must state clearly, The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the in writing,why the Determination should be revised and must be accompanied by a non-refundable $75.00 filing fee. Sum of $ 3 0 .40 Published March 20, 1989 Valley Daily News R5207 • Subscribed and sworn to before me s 2 4 th ay of !'is r cn 19 89 Notary is for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, King County, Washington. VDN#8/F:'v c1 11 86 NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee Public Notice Public Notice Public Notice (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non- The property is located at the southwest MOSQUITO ABATEMENT Written comments received after 5:00 p.m., Significance-Mitigated for the following pro- corner of N.E. Fourth Street and Bremerton (CITY OF RENTON ECF-002-89) March 14, 1989 will not be considered. A jects under the authority of the Renton Avenue N.E. Applicant seeks approval for a Mosquito fourteen (14) day appeal period will com- Municipal Code. RENTON CROWN APARTMENTS Abatement Program (1989-1993) over 65 mence following the finalization of DNS-M. OLD NATIONAL BANK (ECF; SA; R-122-88) acre area of the Panther Creek Wetlands. The mitigation measures imposed by the (ECF: R; SA-121-88) Applicant seeks to rezone 7.57 acres from Location: Panther Creek Wetlands located City of Renton's Environmental Review Applicant seeks to: 1)rezone 1.41 acre site Business District (B-1) to Medium Density east of SR 167 between 1-405 and S.W. Committee are available at the Planning from OP(Office Park)to B-1 (Commercial); Multi-Family Residential(R-3) and site plan 43rd Street. Properties include those under Division of the Community Development 2)obtain site plan approval to construct an approval to construct 111 apartment units. private ownership and those under public Department, Municipal Building Renton, approximately 5,200 square foot addition to The property is located in the 800-850 ownership. Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. fisting Old National Bank building. block, Rainier Avenue North. This decision will be finalized in 15 days. Published February 27, 1989 Valley Daily News R5196 cn rn DC 'lc; tos. c c u) • a) a) s. (1) G cts O t. En cn =r Cu — .«S 0O b O 1: 0 0 CI) Z q rn 12 W b C.) C CA 4CZ c, a) as c C ° 41 Co p '�▪ • O c C D !l \ CID ° \ 6 ›' ° 3 r , >' 1w�▪ F, a°) p' cn a ate' O c�5 a) o \ I CD o tc ai ca q bp CD ›. )\ ,.,‘ M w C D t, W O 0 "ciw $- co c 1+1 C +�-� L3 c`" U� cu O cCf t" k Co \ \ O 0 M�1'Lj c z c c . a) - c w U A ° fl s. c , a, ') U 'O w .o ° W g cc >. �s O k • w 1�1 0 c .V CZ Q �" vcv \ V ,\ \ - x cv f~ ° wp4 a ° ro rn >4 3 .F.:, r ° r w° o 0 • rn ° c a�i .c o ° \ 1 z ° y b c cC +J Co A y �.0 Cl. S. �� cCID ^d ° W ^ vim' r' p ~r_� ..Co w O C O0 o c OD I N c = Co + cn ti r' 0" CI, y a. 'cn .0 >+ •Co c °" a) O a as m as a) • c aD W >, CO O �' " . - r" d Co• • CO . ° CL U ° a) bO c w s. c -1 , Q 0- = .- c°� = x H u) b r' 3 Cl)Hrn 0 CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO. : ECF-121-88 APPLICATION NO(S) : R-121-88, SA-121-88 PROPONENT: Old National Bank DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Applicant seeks to: 1) rezone 1.41 acre area site from OP (Office Park) to B-1 (Commercial) ; 2) obtain site plan approval to construct an approximately 5, 200 square foot addition to the existing old National Bank building. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Southwest corner of N.E. Fourth Street and Bremerton Avenue N.E. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Community Development Department Planning Division The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43 . 21C. 030 (2) (c) . Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-2822 (D) Renton Municipal Code (see attached sheet) . These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340 (2) . Because mitigation measures have been imposed, the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fifteen (15) days from February 27, 1989. Any interested party may submit written comments which must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. , March 14 , 1989, in order to be considered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period will commence following the finalization of the DNS. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee c/o Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator Planning Division Community Development Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 PUBLICATION DATE: February 27 , 1989 DATE OF DECISION: February 22, 1989 SIGNATURES:,,2 :_—) ,/j . -2- 7,' - ----- , .6' _. 7 ,-Iten Nyberg � :__ Lyn Gu tmann - Acting C% unity Devi pment Director Pu 1 ' c orks Director . DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED MITIGATION MEASURES PROJECT: OLD NATIONAL BANK ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF-121-88 APPLICATION NUMBER: R-121-88, SA-121-88 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: APPLICANT SEEKS TO: 1) REZONE 1.41 AREA SITE FROM OP (OFFICE PARK) TO B-1 (COMMERCIAL) ; 2) OBTAIN SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT AN APPROXIMATELY 5,200 SQUARE FOOT ADDITION TO THE EXISTING OLD NATIONAL BANK BUILDING. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF N.E. FOURTH ' STREET AND BREMERTON AVENUE N.E. RECOMMENDATIONS: ISSUE A DETERMINATION OF NON- SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. That the applicant be required to develop a landscaping plan in order to provide a visual buffer, and a light and glare buffer between the site and neighboring properties, subject to the approval of the City' s landscape planner;. 2 . That the applicant submit a plan for traffic mitigation, including the following measures, subject to the approval of the Traffic Engineering Division. a. A joint access easement for shared access to N.E. - 4th Street from the driveway at the southeast corner of the site. Note: Such easement must be duly recorded with King County with copies sent to the City. b. .Signage and striping at the entrance/exit of the N.E. 4th Street driveway which designates right-in/right-out turns only. c. A plan for providing pedestrian linkage (e.g. raised sidewalks, painted crossing pathways) from the bank to the parking area and the adjacent public right-of-way to ensure safe pedestrian passage. 3 . That the applicant voluntarily bond for an amount of $30,000. 00, for their share of future traffic mitigation measures that are being identified in a Traffic Benefit Zone for this transit corridor. This contribution is recommended to be in the form of a bond valid for at least a •period of five (5) years. Note: In the event that the proponent's fair share of support ' for traffic mitigation is determined to be less than $30, 000.00, a refund will be provided. In no case will the proponent be required to contribute more than $30, 000.00 Old National Bank Page 2 4. That the applicant submit the following plans for approval by the Public Works Department prior to implementing construction activities in order to mitigate impacts from those activities to the site and the neighboring properties: a) an erosion control plan; b) a plan for wheel-washing of construction vehicles prior to their entry onto the roadway in order to prevent the tracking of dirt and debris off-site; c) periodic watering down of the site to control dust; d) a plan for haul routes and hours of operation to limit traffic impacts also subject to approval by Police Department and Traffic Engineering; and e) a $2, 000. 00 bond to enable street clean-up. Note: Staff may wish to recommend a restrictive covenant to require site plan review for any and all future development on this site in order to ensure that activities undertaken on the property are compatible with other neighborhood developments. mmdoc S ' % ' I CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor PLANNING DIVISION February 24, 1988 • • Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section Mail Stop PV-1 I Olympia, WA 98504 Re: Environmental Determinations • Transmitted herewith are copies of Environmental Determinations issued on February 22, 1989: . DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED x OLD NATIONAL BANK ECF; R; SA-121-88 Applicant seeks to: 1) rezone 1.41 acre site from OP (Office Park) to B-1 (Commercial); 2) obtain site plan approval to construct an approximately 5,200 square foot addition to the existing Old National. Bank building. The property is located at the southwest corner of N.E. Fourth Street and Bremerton Avenue N.E. RENTON CROWN APARTMENTS ECF; SA; R-122-88 • Applicant seeks to rezone 7.57 acres from Business District (B-1) to Medium Density Multi- Family Residential (R-3) and site plan approval to construct 111 apartment units. The property is located in the 800-850 block, Rainier Avenue North. ' MOSQUITO ABATEMENT (CITY OF RENTON) ECF-002-89 Applicant seeks approval for a Mosquito Abatement Program (1989-1993) over 65 acre area of the Panther Creek Wetlands. Location: Panther Creek Wetlands located east of SR 167 between I-405 and S.W. 43rd Street. Properties include those under'private ownership and those under public ownership. • The fifteen (15) day comment period for these projects will end on March 14, 1989. Following the end of the comment period, the City will finalize it's Determination unless comments received require a reevaluation. Following the finalization of the Determination there is a required 14 day appeal period. • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 Environmental Determinations r ' February 24, 1989 Page 2 • Y .. DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE • SO-MINER DOCK RECONSTRUCTION ECF-009-89 Application for approval of a shoreline permit to allow the replacement of a dock.destroyed by a tree in a wind storm. The property is located at 3312.Lake Washington Blvd. The Determinations are final and may be appealed to the City's Hearing Examiner no later than 5:00 p.m. on March 13, 1989. Any appeal must state clearly in writing why the Determination should be revised and must be accompanied by a non-refundable $75.00 filing fee. . If you have questions please call Jeanette Samek-McKague or me at 235-2550. Sincerel Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE:mjp • cc: Mr. Gerald W. Marbett, King County Bldg. & Land Division • Mr. Gregory M. Bush, Metro , • Department of Wildlife . Mr. Joe Robels, Department of Fisheries NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE: RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated for the following projects under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. FOLD NATIONAL BANK ECF; R; SA-121-88 Applicant seeks to: 1) rezone 1.41 acre site from OP (Office Park) to B-1 (Commercial) ; 2) obtain site plan approval to construct an approximately 5,200 square foot addition to the existing Old National Bank building. The property is located at the southwest corner of N.E. Fourth Street and Bremerton Avenue N.E. RENTON CROWN APARTMENTS ECF; SA; R-122-88 Applicant seeks to rezone 7.57 acres from Business District (B-1) to Medium Density Multi-Family Residential (R-3) and site plan approval to construct 111 apartment units. The property is located in the 800- 850 block, Rainier Avenue North. MOSQUITO ABATEMENT (CITY OF RENTON) ECF-002-89 Applicant seeks approval for a Mosquito Abatement Program (1989-1993) over 65 acre area of the Panther Creek Wetlands. Location: Panther Creek Wetlands located east of SR 167 between I-405 and S.W. 43rd Street. Properties include those under private ownership and those under public ownership. This decision will be finalized in 15 days. Written comments received after 5: 00 p.m. , March 14, 1989 will not be considered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period will commence following the finalization of DNS-M. The mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Planning Division of the Community Development Department, Municipal Building Renton, Washington 98055, . Phone: 235-2550. Published: February 27, 1989 A COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE STAFF REPORT February 22 , 1989 A. BACKGROUND: APPLICANT: Sunset Square Management/Ronhovde Architects PROJECT: Old National Bank ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF; R; SA-121-88 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Applicant seeks to: 1) rezone 1. 41 acre site from OP (Office Park) to B-1 (Commercial) ; 2) obtain site plan approval to construct an approximately 5200 square foot addition to the existing Old National Bank building. The proposed structure is to be architecturally integrated with the existing development. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Southwest corner of N.E. Fourth Street and Bremerton Avenue N.E. Environmental Review Committee Staff Report Old National Bar'- ,Page 2 February 22,. 1989 B. ANALYSIS 1. BACKGROUND: 2 . ISSUES: (ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS) 1. Whether environmental impacts are anticipated in conjunction with the rezone as a discrete action. No environmental impacts are anticipated in conjunction with the non-project, programmatic rezone. 2 . Whether the applicant has sufficiently identified and addressed aesthetic impacts anticipated to occur in conjunction with the proposed development? The applicant has designed and located the proposed structure and parking area in a way that is consistent with existing development on the property and that is compatible with surrounding residential and commercial developments. Staff recommend that landscaping and screening be improved, with the addition of a combination of plantings of sufficient size and number to provide an attractive environment for employees and consumers, and an appropriate visual buffer between the development and nearby residential and commercial developments. Such a plan should be subject to approval by the City' s landscape architect. 3 . Whether the applicant has sufficiently identified and addressed traffic impacts anticipated to occur in conjunction with the proposed development? Traffic impacts are anticipated both on- site and to the adjoining rights-of-way from the proposed development. This development is intended to both improve the level of service to existing customers and to permit expanded services; thus the number of trips to the site, both by employees and consumers, is expected to increase. On-site traffic impacts can be mitigated by: a) provision of the required number of parking stalls with dimensions which correspond to requirements established by City code; b) provision of on-site signage and markings to direct traffic to the most safe, efficient travel route; and c) provision of pedestrian pathways to link the bank to the parking areas and to adjacent sidewalks. rinvironmentaj. Review Committee Staff Report Old National Ba71- • 'Page 3 February 22, 1989 Traffic circulation to adjacent public roadways can be improved by: a) the proposed joint access system from the eastern boundary of the property to N.E. 4th Street; b) contribution to traffic mitigation fees and off-site improvements as required by the Traffic Engineering Division. 4 . Whether the applicant has sufficiently identified and addressed noise, light and glare impacts anticipated to occur in conjunction with the proposed development? The expanded bank facility will increase the level of use on this site, thereby increasing to some degree the anticipated noise level. Hours of operation will remain unchanged. Staff recognize that the proposed development is located along N.E. 4th Street a major arterial, which generates a more significant noise impact on the area than will the proposed development. Under these circumstances no specific noise baffle is recommended; landscaping is expected to provide a minor level of noise containment. Light and glare may be increased to some degree, again based upon an increase in use of the site. Existing exterior lighting and new exterior lighting, as recommended by City staff to illuminate the proposed new structure, should be' directed toward the interior of the site, and the area buffered with landscaping to mitigate off-site impacts. 5. Whether the applicant has sufficiently identified and addressed public services/facilities impacts anticipated in conjunction with the proposed development? Public service resources are sufficient to accommodate the anticipated needs of this development. Off-site improvements (described in the Land Use Section above) may be required to facilitate services to the site, and to mitigate off-site impacts. 6. Whether environmental impacts are anticipated in conjunction with the proposed rezone? No environmental impacts are anticipated in conjunction with the rezone action. 7. Whether construction related impacts from the proposed development have been adequately identified and addressed? Environmental Review Committee Staff Report Old National Ba:" Page 4 February 22, 1989 Staff recommend that the applicant be required to submit the following plans for approval by the Public Works Department prior to implementing construction activities in order to mitigate impacts from those activities to the site and the neighboring properties: a) an erosion control plan; b) a plan for wheel-washing of construction vehicles prior to their entry onto the roadway in order to prevent the tracking of dirt and debris off-site; c-) periodic watering of the site to control dust; d) a plan for haul routes and hours of operation to limit traffic impacts also subject to approval by the Police Department and Traffic Engineering; and e) a $2 , 000. 00 bond to enable street clean-up. C. RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommend that the ERC issue: a. A Determination of Non-Significance for the proposed rezone; and b. A Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated for the proposed bank expansion, with the following conditions: 1. That the applicant be required to develop a landscaping plan in order to provide a visual buffer, and a light and glare buffer between the site and neighboring properties, subject to the approval of the City' s landscape planner; 2 . That the applicant submit a plan for traffic mitigation, including the following measures, subject to the approval of the Traffic Engineering Division. a. A joint access easement for shared access to N.E. 4th Street from the driveway at the southeast corner of the site. Note: Such easement must be duly recorded with King County with copies sent to the City. b. Signage and stripping at the entrance/exit of the N.E. 4th Street driveway which designates right- in/right-out turns only. c. A plan for providing pedestrian linkage (e.g. raised sidewalks, painted crossing pathways) from the bank to the parking area and the adjacent public right-of-way to ensure safe pedestrian passage. Environmental Review Committee Staff Report Old National Ba;= Page 5 February 22, 1989. 3 . That the applicant voluntarily bond for an amount of $30, 000. 00, for their share of future traffic mitigation measures that are being identified in a Traffic Benefit Zone for this transit corridor. This contribution is recommended to. be in the form of a bond valid for at least a period of five (5) years. Note: In the event that the proponent's fair share of support for traffic mitigation is determined to be less than $30, 000. 00, a refund will be provided. In no case will the proponent be required to contribute more than $30, 000. 00 4 . That the applicant submit the following plans for approval by the Public Works Department prior to implementing construction activities in order to mitigate impacts from those activities to the site and the neighboring properties: a) an erosion control plan; b) a plan for wheel- washing of construction vehicles prior to their entry onto the roadway in order to prevent the tracking of dirt and debris off-site; c) periodic watering down of the site to control dust; d) a plan for haul routes and hours of operation to limit traffic impacts also subject to approval by Police Department and Traffic Engineering; and e) a $2, 000. 00 bond to enable street clean- up. Note: Staff may wish to recommend a restrictive covenant to require site plan review for any and all future development on this site in order to ensure that activities undertaken on the property are compatible with other neighborhood developments. D. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS: Various City departments have reviewed and commented upon the project. These comments are as follows: Police Department: No comments on route sheet. Fire Prevention Bureau: Probable minor impact - public services. Fire flow availability for this development appears to be deficient. See site plan. review. Design Engineering: Probable minor impacts - earth, air, water, transportation, public services, and utilities. More information necessary for utilities. No objection to rezone. Traffic Engineering: Probable minor impact - all elements. Environmental Review Committee Staff Report Old National Ba-'- `Page 6 February 22, 1989 Utility Engineering: Probable minor impact - utilities. Fire flow may be too low for size of building proposed. Storm Water Drainage Probable minor impact - water and utilities. No objection to rezone. Detention required will be for a 25 year storm with a 5 year release rate. It is in a critical drainage basin. Provide biofiltration of storm water where possible. Parks and Recreation: No park or recreation impacts. Building Division: Probable minor impact - housing. Current Planning Division: Probable major impacts - all elements. Recommend a DNS. Long Range Planning: Probable minor impacts - all elements except aesthetics and transportation. More information necessary for aesthetics and transportation. 1) a rezone to B-i a this site is consistent with the comprehensive plan. 2) It is not clear what the on-site traffic circulation patterns will be and it is not clear how pedestrian movement might relate to these traffic patterns. Will •pedestrians have to cross in front of cars lines up for the drive through in order to get to the building? Where are the handicapped parking stalls? 3) A flat roof can be used as a platform for unattractive heating and air- conditioning equipment. If this is to be the case, will it be screened? Will it be screened to the extent that future, taller, buildings in the area will not be exposed to it? . ' ql 4 1 :i 4 ENVIRONMENTAL ::: • , . 1 .. . , , , ,..,„ ,.. ...•.•• _`` DECLARATION . . . •:,• •• • ',A ECF-121-88, SA-121-88, R-121-88 is :;�„* APPLICATION NO. • rF; OLD NATIONAL BANK APPLICANT i k;�} PROPOSED ACTION APPLICANT SEEKS TO: 1) REZONE 1.41 ACRE SITE ? ..,ri FROM OP (OFFICE PARK) TO B-1 (COMMERCIAL) ; 2) OBTAIN SITE PLAN 514 APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT AN APPROXIMATELY 5,200 SQUARE FOOT ADDITION TO THE EXISTING OLD NATIONAL BANK BUILDING. 25 e,"i'l r. • 4 GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS ' ti`i `J SOUTHWEST CORNER OF N.E. FOURTH STREET AND BREMERTON AVENUE N.E. • r;i 1xi • t POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS , .,. OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. I{l�y lA; THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE ;+ (E.R.C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE ' .. .,'4a PROPOSED ACTION DOES 1,1DOES NOT 1 'A' HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. • • : t, AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT • ;;tip ,�: WILL WILL NOT . !i , :::,Vi BE REQUIRED. j.4 i4i THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS • .',• PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. • ri COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY MARCH 14, 1989 , ` li AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY 0 BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER :;:fi; BY 5:00 P.M., . 'i .44 '• FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON • ;„<< PLANNING DIVISION AT 235-2550. . ' n ;y DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE • WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION. ' CERTIFICATION • `-----_ I , Mo.wij So jjI0. , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT 3 - COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN • 3 CONSPICUOUS ` PLACES ON OR NEARBY THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY ON 5wcoynev oS N,g. +5t. 0,34A6rjvno;to0 Avc, t ,E. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a - Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington . • residing in h}aaN , on thec:-� ,SIGNED : Y)7 aiuy �ai . day of 17e/ 1 G)A-e ; • liL . N OT I C E ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION APPLICATION NO. ECF-121-88, SA-121-88, R-121-88 APPLICANT OLD NATIONAL BANK PROPOSED. ACTION APPLICANT SEEKS TO: 1) REZONE 1. 41 ACRE SITE FROM OP (OFFICE PARK) TO B-1 (COMMERCIAL) ; 2) OBTAIN SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT AN APPROXIMATELY 5, 200 SQUARE FOOT ADDITION TO THE EXISTING OLD NATIONAL BANK BUILDING. GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS SOUTHWEST CORNER OF N.E. FOURTH STREET AND BREMERTON AVENUE N.E. POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (E.R.C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES K1 DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT • WILL WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY MARCH 14, 1989 AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION. 4 „Tr, . „._ -------...--------......,CITY OF RENTON :::;:: " 1. .. , . APIVI • c24., zai POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT . ' a )110 .. ,,-;-. ... ,i;T .:-----,r....... `,---,-----1-z---- -.....— -, . -I- r#4. ?II z-.'ID l'Z 1....vz - . 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 1sr. yaw, to "'Is, •.„r>' t :-..-41,4. ---:. ---,...,,;_i4,......„-.,,,----: ' Sr' 111414,I A SIA• s•,`:!`..r: \ r 'r!6 6 3 ' ' ' ilibahn, _44/11,04seire PI 4/41841374 4744: P.48:404 44Illit %.„::::. 4 SiliZIIPe8/4, . icu..--c--"Xil .°R•c)('-'11`3 1 pe---x570/1/43 i bt-Yr 9£3(55-4= .:, NOTICE OF PENDING SITE PLAN APPROVAL t RENTON, WASHINGTON r N 1 i ` A Site Plan Application has been filed and accepted with the Planning Division of the Community Development Department. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. 9 p DESCRIPTION: ONB Office Building Expansion ECF; SA; R-121-88 I The applicant seeks to rezone the property from Office Park (O-P) to Business District (B-1) and to construct a building of approximately 5,200 sq. ft. adjacent to and similar in appearance to an 1. existing building on the site. ri o GENERAL LOCATION: r SW Corner of NE 4th Street'and Bremerton Avenue NE PUBLIC APPROVALS: I. ; Environmental Review Rezone Site Plan Approval ' Building Permit i The application can be reviewed at the Planning Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval. For further information on the application or dates of final action by the City, please contact the Planning Division at 235-2550. _ e I t I ' _DI)" ! I — , I,... s_ 1�N� `rt5}:t;t1+'I'' • , LLLJJ _ • _,� 1 �• ' ` I Li1 1 �s _� _ ' ' .I. '2. It�i•P ST :., 2 _ . • _ . ._ , _ R ,,„. , . , ,,,,,;,,..,,, I 'I :‘... dl:'ti.. ! ..... .:_::::' ,, . ...:. 4.. .7.:i!..71,;:11111, �;_ , L •le .. 6 � • Il .• 4] ii ? .f _ �I , _ - _—_ ' 1 osil.:21— i4:,A sl I o ;o EMI ,, 1 \ G . 1 1 , ._... ; _ �. ram' 7' •�F�;;�, U� W�J� V fI El ;•.,.. I,. fin; l , �. I,rl `l v1 • 71 t 4i:: s • I a 9. i,, Ftt. ! I i of ' .'�',. 'n {0 •,},./�� {lif I,';16'i 17074 3 ., R•-'3 -: ` I_. .1 ;{. •Ili A';f'• ' 1,. ' I ; E3 I � 1 I , . ! ► ' -�.-ter` III �1t ,1 � .- a c ..e v4r4 II +k117v'i , • J? .. �,•'f,`1•• , tdri VA A _\-\--1—I : ? 11 �"r ems_ • f j��4 B-'1 1I' 'S, ', • i,ryi,'i' •4,; I 1_;11 __,_ _ . . ...i\ • ! i' • a'. IP p; i. _J- - - - -- i I�'`' 1 I I I .I hI 6'i� ;'fn,',!it,:. , 'ry : , 7 4 JJ, .l,,ji .1.,, rs�� • ... •r! - EDHAORONI-10VDE ARCHITECTS . • ... .. . - ,, . .,, C.S2.1 4,,....,"2:.1 r 7— 10413 W.„LAMES ST.SUTE 102 ,:j.7_--- .-.1 Kew.WAS-INGTON 98032 - -- - -- '- FHONE(206)854-5010 • ,. . _.._._. _- _--- -•,-- . _ ___.-, — ---=-----":_-'' . • .. .;------=.-_----_------= ---L----1 __..., r -- --,_-A--- i, v ,1 _-.-_ __ i, •I •1• :,-,- . .. _ -= gleri=i1 i -. --_ ,..__ .•. EL: r, 4 ,•-•.— EA sr....o vai.c.V..2 ...e....,erik,CriNS • . c.,•••...6,tar!• .1.If . \.. ) - NORTH ELEVATION OFFICE ,,-•-..• BUILDING •• - . , . .. • EXPANSION ... ... ---,.• • _. .. _ . -::• •__. • _ ,_-_-_-_-=-- ___.• . _ - - .___ . - .------.•_-___:• . .-. -. =;.---- • '-••- --, "'An. E.s.,..0 -• -. ...- .-= i-I l' . ! ' -.L. ----=. ---.—• r'+'"=- 1 1 ——7=.--- =7: i _ .-__ •- - - - -. -. . • _ - - •:- ....jas2.1!....,1 Dt-ar..o garal....oks se./cauc-vt.i. , - SOUTH ELEVATION .... : •0 - . ri 7 , . 1, . , . _•- •- ..-. ..._ --- ----_, ___ __ ----------, .-=—_=-.. ---. ---- ---____-----..---.7: _, _.7•1.--,.., ..7....-.. , - ,-.=..____, '-:.•-.--L-.., - I '' ' -7,- . . . , ..;..-' - — ,_. _---,', .,,er e- -\.\•-•,„_--- ;--- - ^ ._.e's. .N-,.1Z'_. .....,..31 eve....-- C-•.1 WEST ELEVATION ....._ 1 • ............ • I-. o . - t -. 1 7-- • . ,•-• -141- = ... -------- ----:"_...._. ,,....--.• _..,.,. . Now••••• i - ,Dm ,Desnrma _....._.....-.. . .. M..l...i.e.. .,1-4....1" -. . . ' . , .. ace be.6E+2,7 PM EAST ELEVATION - ' . .., 00n•••.1''IZ -••-•,..., P.....r. . X •'-,,- . • fg:._ ...... • . , ... . I i . , I • • . . • . . . ,. • ID. • N A RONI-10 VDE • . . . ., . . • . . ARCHTECTS . . . • . 1048 W.JAKES ST.SUITE 102 . - KENT,WASFIN3TON 98032 PHONE mow 854-6010 . • • , . . ., - •_.,.___. s. „mug . . . . • . 0.00111.,MOTM. 01.11.•63•1 .1.,...3.‘ e- •41011........$40404 1.0140 Cer I AKIOTIMPI.--1 ---• -----. t • I "":\.1. :1"....I.K . l • . , . .2.p.s.' •twoces•re r .- .. " , • . . • DERCE. . • ro7hia...t•WE ..• 5-3ilint.__ List • . ( , . . • , .> • • . . ,... . . v_:,,,;. • \ BUILDING' NWIC0i. Me,1,47.14019 • raftte.,1.00fle • • P.I..11,ThidiVext ' ... ) " .....•"da't 11i4cro,14s.1e CA BsMa"me IMSgill: --0 1L•-.1114.1.MLA-- EXPANSION _ •ss.nos ussisms, ,:._ • 7 ,, so us.wr...i.so ' YPIrs4:7 assuer lt.-Iles,110•011;1.410 N '3 • . I . 'e.)'. .I.Ce•-•,.....arriL&wear•SLIC " • . .7e...1:22111XA NM& ( =WO Mg 'NS,MIL . • a (--. . • . 7 lil . l lie IQ e.,................0, \I i / . 1.1:.•tIrCA.,0'.101C.,./1". 431...c.xurom„.....,...,......0,17,,,,,,,Li-•... .& . ...1 •-•enr.msawy WI, 4 . lt - • —-.- ' • • 3 . 10 i 1 r z.,.........i. ..iv7;...1____,------7. -.1. • 1 • ovccoarecncr.l.b...sx —v-ir Mil.445. ••40 1 .'t E.V.,'..1 • i n ri n , • • - -- - ®V15..•••••LIM..;;PC.T...VreINIVE•N* tY-14'1-1,5bw-ess. A , ' - 0.14.4/161.0.11M , .2 • • • • ...D....ME= • 4197e irl-0.C.WeroWig II 1-• •01 , l. 1.......1 er.a.fal f•rf .,TC•li ' . J6,1....1.1 ...-—__ r,, -. ••-w.f.Obt...C1.0 1,.. 0 0- •7 a...--.•-- : • —.—....... ( . . -• - , i . . o . 1 , . . 4. . •1 - ....En e. . • Par..,•V : 1 I t: . . :-.........f.: ..:^.....,CC 421./... ....rol ea-5 ...s- .....17.vaa P.a0; 'Der .. ,-; m•••••.10.0. a ! i -ar CZ •••II.C...4-"left-, C..Er!avE , 1 - .. ../....,Sca...x.. 4. ....10.C.0 . ,. V.Y. .4_5rogif ( 1....0../..8,2.X..- .., E"7-'4C'• :T • .. ,.....r........._._,,....-4:Zp.--,,.. .7}....r- •,- j•-... ' •-....;-."' ..,..'. .7".. 'W.' r ca....e.•adm.....--•raft. ..__. ..... Ss 0.1EMSE2=0110.1=133211 t . . - .. • al, .i..1..>. (r.76-7—n-rs le.C.A.te !SU . •---.1"'. • ••,...=e • a..e.......-— : , -.. •"...- " 1 . • , • 1 i 1 1 .1 1 1 • 1, 1111 1 1 I . r. - aro 4.,.....• . , • - - -• ----- -- 0' ...--, . . . . . . : . ! ..---,,; ,. . .•..._ . . ,zi • . i - -- , , ..ripb.011.15.•• .....• .--- . -. . . / ........ SITE PLAN/LANDSCAPING PLAN Oa 1 OM I DONN.. _ .,•N••••2c, 1 t . : . JO In 1••••ft. . , , .. I ,f'. ------- .. . _ . . . _ D.MA/RONf-IO E a ARCHITECTS ,048 W.JAA£S ST.SATE 102 KENT•WASI-NGTON 9E032 PHONE(206)8543010 1'5da.. o - .c+arc• > f�+mn .•a.cat°� `s lb....de. 'oacc.i suort• „Yi „' at,O • OFFICE BUILDING • �d�°tr EXPANSION Wdlill • • u e _ • 1_ f - zS c ` - r ,:,--3o�r�r'M) -- -- -- - ------ - - --- - -v'-- r - -� -�- ----- - -- • ,—_-...ae.csc+ I ems. r•wi I } — fl iiJ C I c :i• Ir' I I i ix : I �1 � '� i : I .. ....10-- . x.• -...1 ..• ., .��-.,. abl • ...c.......-......-,. v... ( s fro• s • 4 IiLi ! i � I / .L . --- • -- + 2.5 EC' ••56•1:6 S.5 JI.^ GSM ..f - laws+ _ Gpalt 1 G PLAN 11. 1 ON. 1 Dro� I I. AD Ns.267 dad do. Cr arrr tiTlk .•�i ar.11121-66 0 REL_=DN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT -- ARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 'L N441 Y3 DID j 31Oi ).— M I AM/p _ DATE CIRCULATED: January 13, 1989 COMMENTS DUE: January 27, 1989 ECF-121-88 APPLICATION NOS. : R; SA - 121-88 PROPONENT: SUNSET SQUARE MANAGEMENT PROJECT TITLE: ONB Office Building Expansion BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The applicant seeks to rezone the property from Office Park (O-P) to Business District (B-1) and to construct an approximately 5,200 square foot building adjacent to and similar in appearance to an existing building on the site. LOCATION: Southwest corner of N.E. Fourth St. and Bremerton Ave. N.E. SITE AREA 1.41 acres BUILDING AREA (gross) : 5,200 square feet IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° 0 O ° 0 2 . Air ° o 0 ° ()- 3 . Water 0 0 ° O ° ° 4. Plants ° 0 o ° 5. Animals \\) ° O ° ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° ° . ° 7. Environmental Health ° o ° ° 8. Land & Shoreline Use ° O 0 ° 9 . Housing 0 ° o ° ° 10. Aesthetics ° O 0 0 11. Light & Glare ° o ° ° 12 . Recreation ° o ° 0 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° ° 0 O - ° ° 14. Transportation ° o ° 15. Public Services ° o ° 16. Utilities ° COMMENTS: 0 R ,6 On On END C) IV Y We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or arc where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. -------__Y T- . �) 2(v, tall Signature of D ector or Authorized Representative Date . Rev. 6/88 REE__v COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Dom - RTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-112-88 APPLICATION NO(S) . : R; SA-112-88 PROPONENT: SUNSET SQUARE MANAGEMENT PROJECT TITLE: ONB BUILDING EXPANSION BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The applicant seeks to rezone the property from Office Park (O-P) to Business District (B-1) and construct an approximately 5,200 square foot office building adjacent to and similar in appearance to an existing building. LOCATION: S.W. corner of N.E. Fourth St. and Bremerton Ave. N.E. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: 2-1-89 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION /G, SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON JANUARY 27, 1989. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Pc. m I'4 /9 )i 0l51 OKL APPROVED <: APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED c0wih1E An KtzoNc Fizoon 0 -P To B- 1 L rwt PcP A I N) Fort /<LJoo 1Jt * s- M6 s140kii,L o ppi6 ntI yi6o sTI1C/ moos To Y1 rc� Yle P/I5yIA. � TIC k-orvg 13 tii& 1 iU I�t NO , a (� i�;I�, )sT i�6 toUf9 MS ri .is,<l rr\-xo 5R57 PRopdm7`( �--►�� 6 )6o 'va I33 (dui-0,4 L CeSS AR f_e DATE CU • 9, . I 9 SIGNATURE OF DRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE RE . 6/88 E'.1. j ��`lQ1 RENiurf COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT / if'f/n ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHE R .r e cry-�^-/.'7. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: m t,‘1,3't e,g e 3 /0/v v v., e x1 DATE CIRCULATED: January 13, 1989 COMMENTS DUE; January 27, �9 IECF-121-88 APPLICATION NOS. : R; SA - 121-88 PROPONENT: SUNSET SQUARE MANAGEMENT PROJECT TITLE: ONB Office Building Expansion BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The applicant seeks to rezone the property from Office Park (0-P) to Business District (B-1) and to construct an approximately 5,200 square foot building adjacent to and similar in appearance to an existing building on the site. LOCATION: Southwest corner of N.E. Fourth St. and Bremerton Ave. N.E. SITE AREA 1.41 acres BUILDING AREA (gross) : 5,200 square feet ` IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° . . . 2 . Air ° . . . 3 . Water ° . 0 . 4 . Plants 0 0 0 . . 0 5. Animals 0 . 0 . 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° . . . 7. Environmental Health ° • 0 0 - - 8. Land & Shoreline Use 0 ° 0 - , 9 . Housing ° . ° 10. Aesthetics • ° ° 0 0 . 0 11. Light & Glare ° . . 12. Recreation ° . . . 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° ° 0 0 . 0 14. Transportation ° . . . 15. Public Services • ° ° . . . 16. Utilities ° COMMENTS: 1/2_ 77 ; /nth.,, . -°'4 4L5-e st'l -- r-11.7e We have reviewed thi- a•1.1i ation with particular attention to those areas which we have exper ise : Wave identified areas of probable impact are where additional in orm- of needed to properly assess this propos 1. I . . / J . e Signature of Direc+%' or Authorized Representative Da Rev. 6/88 ' ' ' 00 00 . RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ' DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-112-88 APPLICATION NO(S) . : R; SA-112-88 PROPONENT: SUNSET SQUARE MANAGEMENT PROJECT TITLE: ONB BUILDING EXPANSION BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The applicant seeks to rezone the property from Office Park (O-P) to Business District (B-1) and construct an approximately 5,200 square foot office building adjacent to and similar in appearance to an existing building. LOCATION: S.W. corner of N.E. Fourth St. and Bremerton Ave. N.E. TO: I PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: 2-1-89 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: FG.b I., 11841 ✓ UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION ; FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON BUILDING DIVISION tD 'JA N 2 7 1989 PLANNING DIVISION _ nn SHORT RANGE ly'I LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON JANUARY 27, 1989. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: "/„L,/ry •E1 /6/A/,a,ER/A/. APPROVED X APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ' NOT APPROVED Rea** co iH.�' , isms./[ N UTILITY APPROVAL SUBJECT TO( ,' 2/2.7T0'X$3.yt44_ 73700 IT i ACS /07 LATE COMERS AGREEMENT-WATER r)CEs !•d-2� �Ald /%/�i j; _• ��::i�, Itl-7t 1�4,! LATE COMERS AGREEMENT-SE: J�/p �I ;: `4-1 ` SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CI AwE-W T R �/p ��Q/� /®�SL�/:' � ��J � SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT G;:,.::`1-SEt�rEat y,� .,o��$a. G� l�DO�' 2, �,¢, o� SPECIAL ASSESSMENT A�:"tl P,:::::wE-WATER /C SPECIAL ASSESSMENT{'9IT�i L 22-SEWER f 1 !( APPROVED WATER PLAIT ?4 4 yS3EE. M i4y (3 a. 12**° -4-A,j TO so(v, APPROVED SEWER PLAN 1PR0VED F't�n.it Fs-ow l2 FIRE HYDRANT L ATID • 7 /� r�ti Wen `t- �er6kt�01'! 7 BY FIRE DEPT. . / , 9 FIRE FIR-I ANALYSIS �.4 "Mal) S l.Ev. F.D. lZ�' DATE / 27 f SIGNATURE OF D RE ORHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 /_ /9- • l_to- ,/Q.i o , i_�'i oa RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DLisRTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: G- rcyt i)(4 1 pry f ,� DATE CIRCULATED: January 13, 1989 COMMENTS DUE: January 27, 1989 ECF-121-88 APPLICATION NOS. : R; SA - 121-88 PROPONENT: SUNSET SQUARE MANAGEMENT PROJECT TITLE: ONB Office Building Expansion BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The applicant seeks to rezone the property from Office Park (O-P) to Business District (B-1) and to construct an approximately 5,200 square foot building adjacent to and similar in appearance to an existing building on the site. LOCATION: Southwest corner of N.E. Fourth St. and Bremerton Ave. N.E. SITE AREA 1.41 acres BUILDING AREA (gross) : 5,200 square feet IMPACT REVIEW. ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth V ° 2. Air ° ° . . ° o . ° ° 3. Water ° 0 0 O 0 ° 4. Plants V ° • ° 5. Animals ° o 0 0 6. Energy & Natural Resources 0 0 ° ° 7. Environmental Health, • ° ` ° 8. Land & Shoreline Use ° " 0 O ° O 9. Housing ° 10. Aesthetics 0 0 ° • ° 11. Light & Glare • ' ° 12 . Recreation 0 0 ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation . ° o 0 ° - 14 . Transportation o ° ° 15. Public Services 0 ° O ° 0 16. Utilities ° COMMENTS.: V We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas which we . - a expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are where a. : onal inform ion is needed to properly assess this proposal. C 1 3 Sign re of Director or Authorized Representative . Date Rev: 6/88 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-112-88 12\ APPLICATION NO(S) . : R; SA-4 2-88 PROPONENT: SUNSET SQUARE MANAGEMENT PROJECT TITLE: ONB BUILDING EXPANSION BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The applicant seeks to rezone the property from Office Park (O-P) to Business District (B-1) and construct an approximately 5,200 square foot office building adjacent to and similar in appearance to an existing building. LOCATION: S.W. corner of N.E. Fourth St. and Bremerton Ave. N.E. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: 2-1-89 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: Fe3, i1110 q UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT XBUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION V SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON JANUARY 27, 1989. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: 1EZ,b G- APPROVED )( APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED �s- DATE l / 7 SIGNATURE OF D CT'OR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 I-a REkkuA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT•'DJZ4sRTMENT . ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: _ FtY t Py v 6nt0.h D Renton Fire()opt _i ' Flrc Prevention Bureau DATE CIRCULATED: January 13, 1989 COMMENTS DUE: Jar WEggEeiN ECF-121-88 APPLICATION NOS. : R; SA - 121-88 PROPONENT: SUNSET SQUARE MANAGEMENT JAN 'l3� 198g, PROJECT TITLE: ONB Office Building Expansion , BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The applicant seeks to rezone the property from Office Park (O-P) to Business District (B-1) and to construct an' approximately 5,200 square foot building adjacent to and similar in appearance to an existing building on the site. ' LOCATION: Southwest corner of N.E. Fourth St. and Bremerton Ave. N.E. SITE AREA 1.41 acres BUILDING AREA (gross) : 5,200 square feet IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ,. ° o , 2 . Air ° o 0 ° 3 . Water ° ° . 0 o 0 ° 4 . Plants ° ° 0 o 0 0 5. Animals 0 ' o ° 0 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° o ° ° 7. Environmental Health ° 0 0 8. Land & Shoreline Use , o °• 0 9. Housing ° 10. Aesthetics 0 ° o 0 ° 11. Light & Glare ° o ° ° 12 . Recreation 0 ^ 0 ° . . ° 13. Historic & Cultural Preservation ° 0 0 o ° 0 14 . Transportation 0 ° ° 0 15. Public Services ° o ° 0 16. Utilities ° COMMENTS: ,. • • 4 - 4 cy.e...;:af, ,./..e.d.- ...-4- "....4-x- ./..e.4e.e2e.ey. We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are wheree //additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. �;�YAei ' /G,/9/9 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative 1_41', . Rev. 6/88 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SH Renton FireDnpt. Flro Prevention Bureau ECF-112-88 • r' APPLICATION NO(S) . : : R; SA-112-88 PROPONENT: . SUNSET SQUARE MANAGEMENT PROJECT TITLE: . ONB BUILDING EXPANSION rJAN •1 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The applicant seeks to rezone the property from Office Park (O-P) to Business District (B-1) and construct an ' approximately. 5,200 square foot office building adjacent to and similar in appearance to an existing building. • LOCATION: S.W. corner of N.E. Fourth St. and Bremerton Ave. N.E. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: 2-1-89 • ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION . SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: Eeb011 g1 - • UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION V FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT • COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION . . • SHORT RANGE • LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT • OTHERS: COMMENTS OR .SUGGESTIONS ,,REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON JANUARY 27, 1989. • REVIEWING---DEPART NT/-DIVISION-: - - - - jr& _tl,�, _ . . . APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED Any development and/or construction shall comply with current Fire and Building Codes and Ordi- nances. A second means of approved access is required. Fire epartment access roads/lanes shall be paved minimum width 20'; minimum height 13' 6". Yes____ No..,�._. Preliminary fire'flow calculations show a fire flow of a.SO - P9. . • is a required.. 3 _ hydrants with a minimum flow of /, oz gpm each 1- is required. ,Primary hydrant is required to be Within iso' feet of the structure. Secondary hydrants are required-to'be within ' soO• feet of the structure. An approved automatic sprinkler system is required to protect the total structure. Yes No All fire department access roads are to be paved and installed-prior to construction. Yes �No _. All fire hydrants are required tO be installed and approved prior to construction. Yes No.._._ /—g//`n/x/,4! av/ REQUIRED FIRC FLOW CALCULATIONS 1. HAZARD IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION NAME ,� sf7 ,e:-. 0 0./4 ff A2i/A .e- AX/7-- U.B.C. CLASS OF BUILD ADDRESS /7;IV 15 (A~sAgid - A/. . . 41 Z31'pa- �,eg - F'aR MGMT AREA 2. DETERMINE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTIQJz CLASS (CIRCLE ONE): I - II IV III V / FIRE-RESISTIVE NON-COMBUSTIBLE ORDINARY WOO{9/( MIXED (NOTE: IF "MIXED", SEE SPECIAL INSTRUCTION FOR AREA AND BASIC FIRE FLOW) 3. DETERMINE AREA: GROUND FLOOR AREA: .FT2 (A) NUMBER OF STORIES: • TOTAL BUILDING AREA: /Y,, V'/7 4. DETERMINE BASIC FIRE FLOW FROM TABLE 01, USING AREA (A): 3"?-5-d GPM (B) 5. DETERMINE OCCUPANCY FACTOR ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: g/„?. J` GPM (C) IF LOW HAZARD, SUBTRACT UP TO 25% OF (B): IF HIGH HAZARDr ADD UP TO 25% OF (B) 6. COMPUTE SUB-TOTAL (B+C): CIF B+C IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) r.t/ /3 7, S GPM (D) 7. DETERMINE SPRINKLER ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: — / A /8 . 7$ GPM (E) CIF COMPLETELY SPRINKLERED, SUBTRACT UP TO 50% OF (D): IF LIGHT HAZARD OCCUPANCY AND FIRE RESISTIVE OR NON-COMBUSTIBLE CONSTRUCTION, SUBTRACT UP TO 75% OF (D). 8. DETERMINE EXPOSURE ADJUSTMENT?: USING THE TABLE AT LEFT AS A GUIDE, ENTER THE SEPARATION AND ADJUSTMENT FOR EACH OF THE "FOUR FACES" OF THE BUILDING IN THE TABLE AT THE RIGHT: SEPARATION MAX. ADJUSTMENT EXPOSURE SEPARATION ACT. ADJ. 0 - 10 25% MAX. NORTH 97 ' ADD /9 % 11 - 30 20% MAX. EAST ,AAA/ ADD /v % 31 - 60 15% MAX. SOUTH • 97' ADD /0 % 61 -100 10°%:MAX. WEST Pi ' ADD ,-2() % 101 -150 5% MAX. TOTAL % OF ADJUSTMENT 150 OR 4-HR WALL 0% MAX. (NOT TO EXCEED 75%) : S. % (TOTAL % ADJUSTMENT TIMES CD) ADJ? :TMENT: -- I7A. '7S GPM (F) 9. DETERMINE ROOF AND SIDING COVERING ADJUSTMENT: CIF SHINGLE COVERING, ADD 500 GPM) ADJUSTMENT: GPM (G) a. COMPUTE ESTIMATED FIRE FLOW REQUIRED: (IF D+E+F+G IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) CIF D+E+F+G IS GREATER THAN 12-000 GPM, INSERT 12,Qd0 GPM) A x-/37. 5-- (D+E+F+G) REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: Q2 3" od GPM (H) tico SIGNED: i�/1/�� I.aTE . -41,7-e . /G , /l,"9 • C/�,� RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT D�rARTMENT /i ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SH -) ," 4 7 9L; O* REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 5i-corm, Wate r / � Wi9Vn9 DATE CIRCULATED: January 13 , 1989 COMMENTS DUE: January 27, igg9z )2 ECF-121-88 APPLICATION NOS. : R; SA - 121-88 PROPONENT: SUNSET SQUARE MANAGEMENT PROJECT TITLE: ONB Office Building Expansion BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The applicant seeks to rezone the property from Office Park (O-P) to Business District (B-1) and to construct an approximately 5,200 square foot building adjacent to and similar in appearance to an existing building on the site. LOCATION: Southwest corner of N.E. Fourth St. and Bremerton Ave. N.E. SITE AREA 1.41 acres BUILDING AREA (gross) : 5,200 square feet IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° O 0 0 2 . Air ° 3 . Water ° 4. Plants ° 5. Animals 0 0 ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° • • • 7. Environmental Health 0 0 8. Land & Shoreline Use ° O 0 • 9. Housing 0 0 ° • • • 10. Aesthetics 0 ° ° O 0 0 11. Light & Glare 0 0 ° • • • 12. Recreation ° • 0 0 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° • 0 - - - • .. - 14 . Transportation ° • • • 15. Public Services 0 ° 16. Utilities • V ° COMMENTS: See. d f/-e1 p' <-• "(o'r COY11r^e",1"S, We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact. or are where additional nformation is needed to properly assess this proposal. f / /3 .Y7 Signature of Director or Au horized Representative Dat / g P. Rev. 6/88 • RENT0/4 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEraKTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-112-88 APPLICATION NO(S) . : R; SA-112-88 PROPONENT: SUNSET SQUARE MANAGEMENT PROJECT TITLE: ONB BUILDING EXPANSION BRIEF. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The applicant seeks to rezone the property from Office Park (0-P) to Business District (B-1) and construct an . approximately 5,200 square foot office building adjacent to and similar in appearance to an existing building. LOCATION: S.W. corner of N,E. Fourth St. and Bremerton Ave. N.E. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: 2-1-89 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: Fe6111/T9 UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT V OTHERS: S+orrin 1A/0,.+6Y COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION. OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON JANUARY 27, 1989. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: '1-0,6rn WAry APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS • NOT APPROVED A70 oh 4 IN -1-0 ov-N c _w 2c G. y eft.N. r-sc- 0.0 'r ;1...; b.1/4-5 iv• \ s f „zt-lorN 0-C sko -- 'MN f)o55-)tie- ° (1}1Z DATE /4/14/ 3//r7 SIGNATURE DIRECTOR OR AUTHO ZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 ill RENivrl COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DrHRTMEN i' C�,p' � �/0`V ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW S = AN ��'04/ 6 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: p h < < e, o y\<S c .4983 O �J DATE CIRCULATED: January 13, 1989 COMMENTS DUE: January 27, " 1� r - , , s ECF=121-.88 , APPLICATION NOS. : R; SA - .121-88 PROPONENT: SUNSET SQUARE MANAGEMENT PROJECT TITLE: ONB Office Building Expansion BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The applicant seeks to rezone the property from Office Park (O-P) to Business District (B-1) and to construct an approximately 5,200 square foot building adjacent to and similar in appearance to an existing building on the site. LOCATION: Southwest corner of N.E. Fourth St. and Bremerton Ave. N.E. SITE AREA 1.41 acres BUILDING AREA (gross) : 5,200 square feet IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE . MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth • ve, o 0 O 0 ° 2 . Air ° ° ° O °• 0 3 . Water ° 4 . Plants 0 0 ° o 0 0 5. Animals 0 0 ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° o ° ° 7. Environmental Health 0 ° 0 8. Land & Shoreline Use ' ° 0 9. Housing ° o ° ° 10. Aesthetics 0 ° ° 11. Light & Glare ' ° ° ' ° ° 12 . Recreation ° o ° . °13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° ° 0 • 0 0 14 . Transportation l/ ° o ° ° 15. Public Services ° o ° O 16. Utilities ° [j ° - ° COMMENTS: p iv0 OO�c�T/ .d 74, leekt2','-e We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Direc or Authorized Representative Date . Rev. 6/88, RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-112-88 APPLICATION NO(S) . : R; SA-112-88 PROPONENT: SUNSET SQUARE MANAGEMENT PROJECT TITLE: ONB BUILDING EXPANSION BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF. PROJECT: The applicant seeks to rezone the property from Office Park (O-P) to Business District . (B-1) and construct an approximately 5,200 square foot office building adjacent to and similar in appearance to an existing building. LOCATION: S.W. corner of N.E. Fourth St. and Bremerton Ave. N.E. TO: ✓ PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: 2-1-89 V . ENGINEERING DIVISION or TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: fe,611 1/%7 11P UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION . FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT . COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION. SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON JANUARY 27. 1989. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: �,(/�j,�/ a-ie/,t,/G-� APPROVED �/ APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED A/O ddj-cehw.4 -� ree pro et riled : !• ; -d jet,d alcw,-4.e/ ' G' 5-7 a4-4 z . ,491-97© Q r�O/n.7L rl✓ 0,,, A445 . 5' !.,/,// lief e I r' .s000444.4 oP0/ use. trey . 0- 40/14- .�y pr` sems. 3. /.lies 4 hroa qA/ .ut ✓, /NG.1,cgl/ 57 j t.rev aik . &/e a -/I-n. Q.//wa/ t. ser �Z. DATE /—/.3—erf SIGNATURE OF DIR ,TOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 ` RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Dzr'aRTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET n! JAN 2 3 1989 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Tr,,,c.*G DATE CIRCULATED: January 13, 1989 COMMENTS DUE: January 27, 1989 ECF-121-88 APPLICATION NOS. : R; SA - 121-88 PROPONENT: SUNSET SQUARE MANAGEMENT PROJECT TITLE: ONB Office Building Expansion BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The applicant seeks to rezone the property from Office Park (O-P) to Business District (B-1) and to construct an approximately 5, 200 square foot building adjacent to and similar in appearance to an existing building on the site. LOCATION: Southwest corner of N.E. Fourth St. and Bremerton Ave. N.E. SITE AREA 1.41 acres BUILDING AREA (gross) : 5,200 square feet IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth X • ° O ° ° 2 . Air 0X ° o ° ° 3 . Water ° X ° 4. Plants As ° o ° ° 5. Animals ° o ° ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources 0 0 ° o ° ° 7. Environmental Health 0 X, ° ° o ° ° 8. Land & Shoreline Use ° ° 0 O �/ O 0 9 . Housing /, 0 ° o ° 1 10. Aesthetics ° o O O 11. Light & Glare ° o ° 12 . Recreation a X ° 0 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° ° o ° 14 . Transportation 0 X 0 O ° O 15. Public Services ° o ° ° 16. Utilities ° ° COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas which we have expe ti- e and have identified areas of probable impact or are where dition 1 f rmation/i needed to properly assess th`s p oposal. 1 Signature of Dire of or Authorized Representative to Rev. 6/88 / RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPATMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-112-88 APPLICATION NO(S) . : R; SA-112-88 PROPONENT: SUNSET SQUARE MANAGEMENT PROJECT TITLE: ONB BUILDING EXPANSION BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The applicant seeks to rezone the property from Office Park (0-P) to Business District (B-1) and construct an approximately 5,200 square foot office building adjacent to and similar in appearance to an existing building. LOCATION: S.W. corner of N.E. Fourth St. and Bremerton Ave. N.E. TO: V PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: 2-1-89 ENGINEERING DIVISION V TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: Fe I,, L11111 UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE. PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON JANUARY 27. 1989. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: <1 /ZAI F(c. APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS X. NOT APPROVED /• A �r-r� 7Jc"vir . ion fee S e✓' e�eth rTi o.-,c 1 1/e4r c(e �Ff` el v,/e4/S 4/+-10L4 /'its 'x fe-5.5 up on CB /4Io� W i()gr. ' $f 6eraor re-or:0 IS reQur`red( U Sr AI. E. q -^ 0- �o,-,1,Qo,r r i e rq uer+,►eviis. 2 Sir-+ E /r-i� ey p n r14- 04.) Fii-re / e it f,J 6i/I� a,'/,6� (P/o) iy ye tuck 21,-IPS' per e itY & s eA l c u/ 7Xere�ee, �r�6,... 'r o, e e [i<JS �+ lLj 1 C J /4( Irv' X /9 t rer /,'r p = '�2 3 53, ,: etccewiy is gvc1,1 - titak 3. T e. e:P.,„ M.E. 1 , .�! p�¢ --4 01,$/ Y--- , ____ " p / s,c.f z 4,40 4t44.1,44 '----- ` i DATE SIGNATURE 0 D - OR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 RE .SON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ORTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: PA S DATE CIRCULATED: January 13, 1989 COMMENTS DUE: January 27, 1989 ECF-121-88 a: : JIVISION Li 'Y OF RENTON APPLICATION NOS. : R; SA - 121-88 BAN PROPONENT: SUNSET SQUARE MANAGEMENT �5 2 4 i969 PROJECT TITLE: ONB Office Building Expansion C E Q V E BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The applicant seeks to rezone the property from Office Park (0-P) to Business District (B-1) and to construct an approximately 5,200 square foot building adjacent to and similar in appearance to an existing building on the site. LOCATION: Southwest corner of N.E. Fourth St. and Bremerton Ave. N.E. SITE AREA 1.41 acres BUILDING AREA (gross) : 5,200 square feet IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° 2 . Air ° 0 0 3 . Water 0 ° 4. Plants ° 5. Animals ° 0 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° 7. Environmental Health ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° 9. Housing ° ° 10. Aesthetics ° ° 0 ° 11. Light & Glare ° ° 12 . Recreation ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° 0 14. Transportation ° ° 15. Public Services ° ° 16. Utilities ° COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are where a 'tion ' formation is needed to properly assess this proposal. /ASP? Sig ure of irector or Authorized Representative Date Rev. 6/88 RENIOT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT D nkTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-112-88 APPLICATION NO(S) . : R; SA-112-88 PROPONENT: SUNSET SQUARE MANAGEMENT PROJECT TITLE: ONB BUILDING EXPANSION ,BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The applicant seeks to rezone the property from Office Park (0-P) to Business District (B-1) and construct an approximately 5,200 square foot office building adjacent to and similar in appearance to an existing building. LOCATION: S.W. corner of N.E. Fourth St. and Bremerton Ave. N.E. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: 2-1-89 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE ✓ PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON JANUARY 27, 1989. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: /041/t✓ i Xec/tie?4 or\ X APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED `VG •,vim `� 'i"Q'f //Cce e1cco,v 0, i 47 DATE !,!e2.4/6P P SIGNATU OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 / . --1 /0 Ai? RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DtZ RTMEN ti 'F ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET c� i/A)0 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: L Oho,- R r rat P Pq6k.v1 h/w)c v Q 'rt9,q,� DATE CIRCULATED: January 13 , 1989 COMMENTS DUE: January 27, "109tY ECF-121-88 APPLICATION NOS. : R; SA - 121-88 PROPONENT: SUNSET SQUARE MANAGEMENT PROJECT TITLE: .ONB Office Building Expansion BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The applicant seeks to rezone the property from Office Park (O-P) to Business District (B-1) and to construct an approximately 5,200 square foot building adjacent to and similar in appearance to an existing building on the site. LOCATION: Southwest corner of 'N.E. Fourth St. and Bremerton Ave. N.E. SITE AREA 1.41 acres BUILDING AREA (gross) : 5,200 square feet i. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR ` INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. . Earth 0 y ° e o 2. Air 0 X' ° 0 e e e 3 . Water X ° 4. Plants ° e ° e 5. Animals • )( 0 ° o e e 6. Energy & Natural Resources X ° e °• e 7. Environmental Health . o e• e 8 . Land & Shoreline Use X ° e e ° 9 . Housing 0 X ° e r e e 10. Aesthetics e e ° 11. Light & Glare ° X ° ° o x o 0 12 . Recreation .° ° 0 e e ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° )( ° e e e 14 . Transportation e e e ' 15. Public Services 0 X 0 O 0 e 16. Utilities ° ° 0 00MMENTS: ® A roe ,i-o B i;s ,`5 -1 q.71- site camsisle071- k,i /4 e_ caorrehoist' ve pta/1, , r -2,., -r -I- ;5 n o d c,l ea(r w 7� e ovi -c i r' *rc1 1 a c a v jc)7io i eq`ff-ery45 v i I k G yid ; i :yOf c (ecr Aow eec e�'�rfon ✓'o0veme ;gW rel rye .ese .7� rct4 t ,,ci Arne (oveç') We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. ate-V.P4\62,1 a/2.14 -NA. -a-7. 1'901 Sigffaturefof Director or'Authorized Representative Date Rev.. 6/88 4. wr l f,P'''e.ce5I r f`c h5 ha vC i rroh7� 0 i CPrS i e d v 1 r P ("r o' ve - -Arrivg4 i i Order t ge f IV ttie i ;I <t116 iNbe e ore 'Ole horii ccIp ptr'( pQ/' ingj 5•Al/ 1- r 3. 4 Flag (oo (oe used os a e o1-Po'r -G r v n Gr r6 -/ve heq)Iih avid gir- co11c -/%r1►..tig -AfI rS &-e /4.e cq5e ‘,„"; i cip.toevi e S C re , ,t4 e . e x ,e77� ) ,i 7 -' ivre, /ale() �i VIl fir' I /4 qre Gt v ;// 6,e -CA osei /G, 1 yr�f , • RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-112-88 PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON APPLICATION NO(S) . : R; SA-112-88 n U IAN 3 1989 PROPONENT: SUNSET SQUARE MANAGEMENT EMU PROJECT TITLE: ONB BUILDING EXPANSION BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The applicant seeks to rezone the property from Office Park (0-P) to Business District (B-1) and construct an approximately 5,200 square foot office building adjacent to and similar in appearance to an existing building. LOCATION: S.W. corner of N.E. Fourth St. and Bremerton Ave. N.E. • TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: 2-1-89 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: ?elotli1411 UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION V( PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE vi LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT • OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING.' PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON JANUARY 27 , 1989. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Lovi RanFe 1%/n414- APPROVED /V APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED Cirt.,%r21 c-ca acw-La ., DATE To/7, 27, /9 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 REW.1:014 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DJiL ARTMENT 141,,, ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ® , dike, - will REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: PO L(G • ' e A /� DATE CIRCULATED: January 13, 1989 COMMENTS DUE: January 27, 1989. ECF-121-88 APPLICATION NOS. : R; SA - 121-88 PROPONENT: SUNSET SQUARE MANAGEMENT PROJECT TITLE: , ONB Office Building Expansion BRIEF .DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The applicant seeks to rezone the property from Office Park (O-P) to Business District (B-1) and to construct an approximately 5,200 square foot building adjacent to and similar in appearance to an existing building on the site. LOCATION: Southwest corner of N.E. Fourth St. and Bremerton Ave. N.E. SITE AREA 1.41 acres BUILDING AREA (gross) : 5,200 square feet IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° ° 2. Air ° 0 0 0 3 . Water 0 0 0 o °- ° 4 . Plants ° 0 o 0 0 5. Animals 0 0 ° o ° 0 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° o ° ° 7. Environmental Health ° o 0 0 8. Land & Shoreline Use ° o 0 0 9. Housing 0 ° 10. Aesthetics ° o 0 0 11. Light & Glare ° '- 0 ° o ° ° 12 . Recreation ° o ° 0 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation o 0 0 - 14 . Transportation ° o ° ° 15. Public Services ° o - 0 0 16. Utilities 0 0 ° COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are where a- itiona n -mat- on s needed to properly assess this proposal. 07. `A17 S gnatu Director or Authorized Representat ve Date . Rev. 6/88 RENT0N COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-112-88 APPLICATION NO(S) . : R; SA-112-88 PROPONENT: SUNSET SQUARE MANAGEMENT PROJECT TITLE: ONB BUILDING EXPANSION BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The applicant seeks to rezone the property from Office Park (O-P) to Business District (B-1) and construct an approximately 5, 200 square foot office building adjacent to and similar in appearance to an existing building. LOCATION: S.W. corner of N.E. Fourth St. and Bremerton Ave. N.E. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: 2-1-89 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: F . y161 UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU ✓ POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON JANUARY 27, 1989. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: folvt-e— APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED DATE GW;9/GF 7 SI NATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 • OF RE t •+'i ( ° ) SEP1 E `.. OF PENDING SITE PLAN APP LIGATION -� DESCRIPTION • ._ • ONB Office Building Expansion ECF; SA; R-121-88 The applicant seeks to rezone the property from Office Park (O-P) to Business District (B-1) and to construct a building of approximately 5,200 sq. ft. adjacent to and similar in appearance to an existing building on the site. • 4 , GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS: SW Corner of NE 4th Street and Bremerton Avenue NE • PUBLIC APPROVALS REQUIRED : Environmental Review Rezone Site Plan Approval Building Permit • PUBLIC COMMENTS WILL BE RECEIVED BY THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT .ANYTIME PRIOR TO PUBLIC HEARINGS AND DURING PUBLIC HEARINGS. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION - CERTIFICATION — I , ,R , U 3O , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT 1 0K ( 4) COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME INyf< C 4) CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON OR NEARBY THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY ON 3AQUA1 27 i 101,8q ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington • residin in7'/ 4.) , on the27' SIGNED : ( fAA/Vid day of e -,A Li O • F R� .► O CITICE _ , 0,9 0911 o 5E0EMe�P OF PENDING SITE PLAN APPLICATION D E R I P T I ® N • ONB Office BuildingExpansion ECF; SA; R-121-88 The applicant seeks to rezone the property from Office Park (0-P) to Business District (B-1) and to construct a building of approximately 5, 200 sq. ft. adjacent to and similar in appearance to an existing building on the site. GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS: SW Corner of NE 4th Street and Bremerton Avenue NE PUBLIC APPROVALS REQUIRED : Environmental Review Rezone Site Plan Approval Building Permit PUBLIC COMMENTS WILL BE RECEIVED BY THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT .ANYTIME PRIOR TO PUBLIC HEARINGS AND DURING PUBLIC HEARINGS. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION . t. AM. NO'•. ..:- ';E OF PENDING SITE PLAN APPRC, ,LL RENTON, WASHINGTON A Site Plan Application has been filed and accepted with the Planning Division of the Community Development Department. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. DESCRIPTION: ONB Office Building Expansion ECF; SA; R-121-88 The applicant seeks to rezone the property from Office Park (O-P) to Business District (B-1) and to construct a building of approximately 5,200 sq. ft. adjacent to and similar in appearance to an existing building on the site. GENERAL LOCATION: SW Corner of NE 4th Street and Bremerton Avenue NE PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review Rezone Site Plan Approval Building Permit The application can be reviewed at the Planning Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval. For further information on,the application Or dates_of final act-ion_by the City, please contact the Planning Division at 235-2550. ___ _,-.--,- ------— 1 '-' -----' Li' ' - , '1 '''• ''' Fil w '4.1i `• i':.0:, :z1;,,. .. 03 7: 'A ,,•?.%,tr; ;'7,;A•ril+7':: --',..: . C,111- 1---g-i'—' !_ R_ .1._ 5 ^,is.' k. . AIIIIIIII 1 .._ _ ',. i „; :J,Q ES le c. :I:...-L_LL ',•-•-,'. [-krrl'''3' r ';' z: t • -., , ' - tztlr.1 ' 0 t , - ST'. 'A•Iii'':'' '. ,•r:-,''fr:,,"4.1 5 . -,,,, 1,1 f•1,;&(,4,7ik: R ,.. 2 . , , -• . > :,,,,,,..-„,,,,,..: 124:44;1r ilk -'lb'? I: ••:-.... ' .s* 11111 ' '° > ,, will r: .., : i ., ., . R 11 R 2 . ff. ., am ., -‘, -1 - .4, '...,:, ,. 4 r,,,,VNi, i'::. ,•,:4 V.,,,,,i,;,-",, icali\i, 1,,;, L,,.: t, 01;14,,,,:!!!,)•• ': '. -'• i'4V; , . • • ( ( • 1 - • :: .:1 : . • 4(i.ilik‘!'• , Ill 2 1 t 1 i 1 , 2 1 14 „ )6 1 \__ (, A•i 1 G tO Pi . i., )5 _..._ _ __ I ...ot,4 f, ja 14 --, 25 4 0 , •, > 31 --r- /-• -3 i H i 4 ] -- - —1--- 1 •: :'-;,,:. , , ;,,,,,, , •• f,,i'"Ail -':' ':. ,----- ':: i •;$-.'', 1 ,t,:+,!JI .! : , .'* u•-y-. ,t:N --':'' '`,I''':',. : _.•.- _ ____--r-IMIum - - 1 alni - I 1 1 1 G- 1 i' i 1 ...... ; z ; ,,. „ . t 4(.,•:'1,• . '- i ' F PUD effi 111111111131 ' ' . , 1•I .:1'1':,' I . !'' '1' ,% s:;,;.A (j.r4?': i•'1'A''','. • 4 . • 4 4,t i i i',`, ..A•g.t i il 1 .; r'i•)!•1';:s1,,';':'. .iqii.:4:i • I ' A ' , R L3 , ! , _, ‘., .,,,,,..„.„.,,,:, • ,,,,•:.,,, ,,„ ,•,. • ,,,,,, ,,:„ ,..„,,,,,,,,,; . , , 0 E3rI \ R3 > D ,: , ,. , , , " , :!.:: ;- . :I ‘''t •i::•0‘.'), - ; • 0 ', :'",,f'61q'::.i :::1,,Y,,t;,, .. , •., 1 I m"""".7„ii:4 r;•;14. , . r' • I ,,, , . „, „••,;i1.0 C : :i',,,,* •,:t:'.', •!'" • k'1 4' Su\Ds. e.,"T 1 1 i:44•44,. • 1 ,4:.g,!',.,'.,.•'','• :f!,.,;,,.., :ec.,:::, ',"..A.',* 1 2 IP -M 4:4,* .4 • B.., 5 tte, N 10...t4;.,: 1 , .',•'I'• " '•'. ''' ' ' '101.'a.; .::4?•''''!r•I;'',‘ 1 ,i.' , :.;',•!:'.-;:'''',.'• ' l'j'e.'r:'!•'.;',•;:', I I 1 '':''N ' '' ul •Y'4•',',7 ' -- I I - MEM lalitiri 1111 1 't, I •i' ': ',:k ,, 41 .',,ir'1 1 , t— --I- - mir.7.................. . _ ______... . ._ __. f . ' • .1•••!!•; . •,I.:: I _______I_ . - - 1 -- ----- • ----.-----'"-- , , ;ir if:,'.,,I',:" i•' 1 " -'' f ' -_-------- ,, I • ,, -------- ) 7:777-7-71 :: (:,iki, i,:1•‘• ,'.: ':, :4!.'i, I 1 • _, ,,i ,,,,t,, . ,4',4',.' ' , !q'l ? ---------- - - le ' 'T': 14.:';';('4,'::-41'' e 4:,,,,,.,.1,,,,.,, , I ' ' ..; "V i 1 T _________ __ . MEV 4 :; 1 R'2° 1 rPuo- o53-96 . , . _ ., ,:.,: ,. 1 .., ... .., ... 4 . , . . . . . . . . . . , 0 HAORONHOVDE ARCHITECTS _ CWAtZ '5,0:NIC... -,c,i.) ' 1048 WwAIANES S10-.64SUrTE 102 . • .....„/".... . __ — FI-Cfe(206)854-5010 .__. -- ' . ___._ __.- , ------ -- , - -.. -_ . _ ._ . __ . ---..-1 1 - -._, . - 1,--"A-,-- ---1 -. t_ rii ---- tT ----.- ------FFF-1-1.-- ' ---- .-- . ----____I-- 1 -=_-_. _.-E. ri,I, •: ---.-_ =Z---a- -_-_.- re ,1 . •,. •,___ Icglfl? AliZZ7,1• ...,....6 te2,1• Ex cf,../3...:C.:5E ......,..1 elk.larJP•E NORTFI ELEVATION OFFICE . BUILDING r,.. . .- -77 _ EXPANSION -1 ___ _ i-T---. _ __ --I ____ •4.,,d1 no,C. — • _ ___. ., -...--. .- --a— -- — ---i __ ;...1....k..G•• '" . -- -=--_, , ii - — , -_ .•••••>, Cx.tf....di — -. —6 -.-.7- - --,-- ..,-a--_-- 1, -_-, -_4-- . ILI • .= •, 1 -.-_ - -On =.--- ---- _i —, • — -- r .. ....J. ._ _ , _ _ _ •._ __ --,,,..— .1 1 ,....-- -.• - A ,L- _..-,-. ,-- —--...-A=---- —_ • -- - • . . ...v.wc...r.( 0....e.„,67...i.,P.E. ..._..9‘,57.43.......,.."13 . . SOUTH ELEVATION . . T - . __ - - -- ---- ----_t_ff i -----__-- _ . . ---- ._-.----- _ — ---w--- . ---=, -= --_- ,-,-,t == -,.. ...______ t----- '•-t.- ___ _,-,.. -_-=_ ---__ -M- 1. 'a - - -_-.. .. -_--== ._=._ -1-= _-.,•_- -----._ -__,_-_-= •,„ •:-___ .• lil 4 ,-•- - --7 7......--....._. eee•m-• WEST ELEVATION . v6.,_0, . • 1 , 3hoe4 Cameo. " '- - SX-rala }1:1-0....:a S.-EV.17.01.A • . 1 . .. I . . _ 1-•,.____. . . . _ .. . , El ---.----.- 0 niciii 1-'irg z ,-,, • Mo. Dam 0«cnoflon ----• .. . 2,7x/S-,t2d ,,, _.- . . . bulk we. AlltaTo - . .,4 ,* ...00 Mo.51,37 dna.No. EAST ELEVATION . Drawn 07.12 Mocked nIVP,-7A es',, ._*-5 . . 4, e.o, • • . . . . ...1,21-se, ., • ' ..--.. • , . . • . . • , I . . ' • • • - - ..':• .44 - • .-... ........ 4.44 • • ' 4 441 "No or _ . . ! ' . , • I :- • ... ! i - • -,t• .• .MA.00 i •AtIlj .1 NYld 9NIdY0SONY1 NYld 3.US . . . . .. . 11.91,,Op. • ,,........„ , — •- • ------' 1 - ..........."`,...'"',. • • 1 • . . • • • • - • , . . .., ....„34,-.... . • . ;rird 541*401.1., .. . _________. ___. ____ __._____________..___. • , i , , I ...• warn..4* - . •,.- . 1 . _1 • . • , . . • 1iHIj • -vete.,1..........r ,,.-,••••"•". 0. ran rally., : ' Ig • ••••:. ainaos 10.1.1.1.—i—f ;., . . . / ., 1•1 MIT \S isminzlesszmamommssamseiscim„, ---- . • t- a. ( I;.. ,--' .W.."..:44.4 SO.. 41.1.1,o',N.- I -4 - __,C.:t.).__ Th• -D-. '•,;,1_-.....,Sor- . -• - - -- . •We.,..V; . ] I - • : . •,,r,--.4;x3 v VA-1617,Grfn A a.Kls Tr '43.721Orn ...7 .X4ox,..a.r I . .;--7*ii:,714.0 Tet .1.,1•:••••r,i•. _ . . Y •i I . • • . I 3W, L.A.Vdt,/t4r.r1 Nr. -3.:47tor, vrgarr 0.011.9, :7.....-...: I i . 1 I S : 1 • _ .._ .101.04..•;Mao. . :':' i ,rscav-expro sotacurouar% , Nmei-E3 &? ..............•...m. , era,fil eir.,,,,e-•1,, • Wava.1,1.6 • Ist•M NW P" • ANI-G1-94 . - -————'" . rrin rear , ,..6•470.112, .01,4,..CIA., . a> • r 11 ' 1.µ.....walt 311.1.2"OrrA • P • • . ' 11...11.. : . ,-.i..1 . • ' Vi 1 1 i .-Li t 1 4.12.•"4.94''8.*••1/ V.0101,41.C.:vlu.orti vx•-•NenatA® . . i , 4.' voivin.rt,-.40—,a-Z14\147.04,3=3&64.1 TO'N 'Oa'1,14 .4,--,1712A Welk warmscilcaad-e, - - N• !crii,'lir 1 ii .., . 1 u :;• . • 1:31 t . 1______ .~-., __,---- 4. ,1• .:•-.f.m:v.:f.--- .'t:-•.:i 14mi A...1•••....1:6,.., ,, p/ Vie'..11.1.16-.01 =MI 4C1J.M.4'•-• - - -rway (3504,,Yee k 140424.01-,C,'W*-AI ,-0,•••ed.C.`tem,..6 • • ;• WM..9•rfrjirqlr- ./. ! ,111111 . efft:484420 1 4rfrWogini weer,...a far..a....a V. / rlaiznto)I,r )) • • 4,1'11,.40.18 4I-nrea.'t1t1/4l 4'0.-,4 .2.M4.W...i,.111l1 0e1 Vr!.N1t:41l)42kaWiA I e i 4 •111.1, NOISNVdX3 :1417d1471l1 e1a1g=10.".i14101f.t41.2T10e5.4."2rC-1tM4..V1/4N44r437..444G4e.11 .' . . , ,owning 301.d:10 /--„,„ ga.61.00.1190 ow • • .. , . Vie t.W.10..viabi 7.1.17.i.: . 4/1114.4111 421,1 943.414:14d02 .._ • .;3,-1:'--.i• -- • MU ) - r`-- as..,..=4,6 11,,,,Uniam • I,. 4,01 "W.;Mr irr,g= . lalral\„c ________ R1-4"•a•____ Isi . ._________. - 0109-1,980304 38341 MON NOIONNSVM WEIN . • DX 3U 'IS S3C.1 7a OWL , . . • 9.1.031.FICCV . _ - . ' • • . 3aA' OH43:1/SINCI . • • • . . . 1 OMORONFIOVIDE:1 ARCHITECTS 103 ..-I 1048 W.JAWS ST,..SLITE 102 1 KENT,WASI-NGTON 98332 PHONE(2C6)854-5010 1.5b4.1 --____-__. .,_-_____.a________•_____.__,!,,, ,, .. n.\mum 1 Sartlint% I. e..., • - .. \I r : . •,.. OFFICE - . BUILDING • ‘. . . 1 . . I I . ? ' 1 I • 4. EXPANSIOt Iti • I , ___.) ;•- .,i'''.4. l'... . I , z_ v , I i . I I'• C ! 4 r ' ! i A- :1-._. r--, •4,7,____: _____7. . 1 ,1 i ai,. ! a • -." t 1 I.4 - 4-----;are C.••elltd.C.C3 i I ,....11-1.1.I I.I.A.... / 0 I • i - I 1: 'J U . 0 i . ,.. . , R , 4 _, 1; i.-2,,or...,.,4a ii ,.:.7 ,..,,y-d__ ULM,.ft...Is I, , ........41,.......2. SIL......,P4 . . 4 '.....f-.a.=.6••• 10' • . 1--,..o.., , I I I i I g I \ • 1 II ii../ • ) .• ... . k .........,0,..... c--.---. 'A I . . ( , (1. '' 4,L rrra.914.4 .....,9=....G..1 S . 41,1144 ....,.........E.A----1 -)1 1 1 . 4I I • 81.....Car.. 5.1-c PLAW I 1 1 I 11. 11 lz•li Li ... ,_,,___, ..}...„, . . . • 2: .E... ... - *aliens -------- . .----;-' _(0. ois. O. Dwain.SITE PLAN • • • . • • • • Alb 1...e057 . are.. . OrdneerTFL i„„p. g".5 . . Oral MOP-._Deft II-21.e6 .......... �--I 4' Co CITY OF RENTON "LL PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Traffic Engineering Division MEMORANDUM PLANNING DIVISION DATE: January 10, 1989 CITY OF RENTON tJAN 4 0 1989 TO: Lenore Blauman, Senior Planner ECEIVE FROM: Gary Norris, Traffic Engineer d" SUBJECT: ONB Bank Addition - Dochnal Lenore, I spoke with Denny Dochnal and realize the proposed driveway modification was to provide a joint driveway on NE 4th with the property adjacent on the east. Although there are problems with this proposal , it appears to be the best overall solution. GAN:ad GAN002 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2620 • 'ti(Y" o flTY OF RENTO FILE NO(S): R-r2�-0g fit'. 6_._DING & ZONING DEPARTM �,..T SA- 1Z1 .86 mu © kc. /al•66 MASTER APPLICATiON . NOTE TO APPLICANT: Since this is a comprehensive application form, only those items related to your specific type of application(s) are to be completed. (Please print or type. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) APPLICANT TYPE OF APPLICATION NAME - FEES o N o /(400 NUJ DE p42,GN I TG REZONE*(FROM (:. TO ISA ) ADDRESS p 1044 w• Jp►MES ST. 4#102 • SPECIAL TEMPORARY PERMTIT* . . t` CITY ZIP W COO 2 11 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT* . ' ,r'. TELEPHONE QSPECIAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL , A �G O PERMIT FOR GRADE AND FILL No. of Cubic Yards: CONTACT PERSON Q . VARIANCE* . From Section: * Justification Required NAME "TORJAIJ RoNH0VOT ' ADDRESS SUBDIVISIONS: ' Ak' OVE. El SHORT PLAT CITY • ZIP Q TENTATIVE PLAT Q PRELIMINARY PLAT TELEPHONE Q FINAL PLAT D WAIVER (Justification Required), OWNER NO. OF LOTS: NAME .I',1 u`f / PLAT. NAME: • I✓gM4IS ItNPrV 4 ADDRESS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: 200G SeaDm b& D -AsQ tJ •E Q PRELIMINARY , CITY ZIP 0 FINAL RE-���� t�1>c aPS _`.�o P.U.D. NAME. TELEPHONE r 265 -/41 0 Residential Q Industrial Ai T a Commercial Mixed LOCATION . MOBILE HOME PARKS: PROPERTY ADDRESS - Q, TENTATIVE 1J •�,:- PRELIMINARY ' r' EXISTING USE PRESENT ZONING ��••---�� '_' ° ` CJ 01C I FIB+E (� FINAL •r / r1 cw- • PROPOSED USE PARK NAME: _ l FI.Ge C.1..1L'( 130 IRE(,Lr. NUMBER OF SPACES:" ✓ . • 0 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE . , SQ. FT. ACRES _- IAREA: a,/,‘„oc, I I:4•r I ' TOTAL FEES aL'IN:11IiVU i.J1lSg18RF USE ONLY -- ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING DATE ST CITY OF Rl:1V,ON APPLICATION RECEIVED BY: L.. . , . L DEC .1 5 1988 in) APP I TION DETERMINED TO BE: EICEll [Ifp Accepted Incomplete Notification Sent On By: (Initials) DATE ROUTED ADDITIONAL MATERIAL RECEIVED BY: I - 13- `>ci APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: 0 Accepted QIncomplete Notification Sent On By: (Initials) ROUTED TO: 0 Building I♦I Design Eng. Fire ti Parks (A Police PO Policy Dev. Traffic Eng. IM Utilities REVISED 1=31-84 • Legal description of property (if more space is required, attach a separate sheet). • 1141e= Nu)1/44 1 N'W tai, 1 N E V/Q- 1 Ki W V4 oF L• is) oluaio 23 , 1 R0G 1wNIA . c67:77' TMv U.) 75 imr Ti..wgeoF iiii e$ 4 r - e . 2,0 19 ' . 1 a-DCC:6M T7-(pP[' •.,'6R-T15 YJ CooVP(GO TO KIN& Co . Ft:5 fi (VD PC 13Y• p6ED ((EGo DE10 01.9'0R :Ljfl7J S . FtLe- 5631113 4. /f .so 6)(C61PT Td-ENT FttiRTtokl Coo 6✓O TO K r.l& co. l oT Ro 4) AS CHow k) ON) '51-16AT R.AT As P ECO(Zog iJNrvt=�2, Au 011R S F&L 4 I o'7ci ococ) 1 AFFIDAVIT - i r► I, +o�0 ISO N ti o4De , being duly•sworn, declare that I am (,,authorized representative to act for the property owner,Downer of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS • I DAY . OF - 19 1 NOTARY' PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WA H NGTQN, RESIDING AT 1 �4. . _Laajicie ,,,.. air)(11\/ 4 R4J (Name of Notary Public) • (Signature of•&wnar) t.Gi 3T j 6 6 ? 11* 4teC 1o4& u../ . 0114N465 c6r4i- Ids (Address) ‘, 426-13 (Address) . • C mrri.t ►CO i re.S: 2-1- l2- t our , ,r . q,bo3� (City) (State) (Zip), 2S4 •SaIC) (Telephone) Acceptance of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete application. Plans and other materials required to constitute a complete application are listed in the "Application Procedure." ik Form #174 0 CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor PLANNING DIVISION January 13, 1989 • Torjan Ronhovde 1048 West James #102 Kent, WA 98032 Re: ONB Office Building Expansion, N.E. 4th Street (S.E. 128 Street) and Bremerton Avenue N.E. (136 Avenue S.E.). ECF; R; SA;-121-88 Dear Mr. Ronhovde: The Community Development Department has formally accepted the above referenced application. It has been routed for departmental review and is tentatively scheduled for the Technical Advisory Committee on February 1, 1989 for consideration. If you have any questions regarding the scheduling of this project, please contact our office at 235-2550. Sin ely, • Donald K.' Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE/MBS:mjp cc: Dennis Dochnal Sunset Square Management 2006 Redmond Ave. N.E. Renton, WA 98656 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 Co CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT.OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor PLANNING DIVISION December 28, 1988 Torjan Ronhovde 1048 West James #102 Kent, Washington 9.8032 RE: ONB Office Building Expansion, N.E. 4th Street (S.E. 128th Street) and Bremerton Avenue (136th Avenue) (Project Number: R;SA 121-88) Dear Mr. Ronhovde: We have completed a preliminary review of the above- referenced application. In order to proceed with the evaluation of the proposed project, we must have the additional information described below: . 1. A floor plan which accurately depicts elevations for the existing structure and the proposed structure, and which illustrates the relationship of those elevations. Whereas in elevations the new structure appears to have , facade protrusions similar to the existing structures these are not indicated in the plan. This information is necessary in order to fully assess the aesthetic . impacts of this project. 2 . A brief statement which describes the rationale for excluding the pilasters which are such a strong thematic part of the existing structure apparently from the proposed structure. This information is necessary in order to assess aesthetic impacts with respect to environmental review. 3 . A revised site plan which eliminates access from the driveway located on N.E. 4th at the eastern perimeter of the property. This revision is necessary because 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 Torjan Ronhovde R; SA-121-88 December 28, 1988 Page 2 City staff reports that traffic analysis indicates such access would be unsafe and inefficient. This report is based upon a study of the significant traffic volumes which currently exist, and which are forecast to continue along that corridor. If we receive the above listed materials by January 16, 1989,. we can resume processing of your application. If we do not receive this material by that date, we may return your application having found that it lacks sufficient necessary information to be accepted at this time. In the latter case, you would have to resubmit when the necessary materials are available. If you have any questions, please contact me or Lenora Blauman of my staff, at 235-2550. Sincerely, cTh 4)t Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE/lb:mjp cc: Dennis Dochnal 2006 Redmond Avenue N.E. Renton, Washington 98656 • 41, %o Timw CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor PLANNING DIVISION December 28, 1988 Torjan Ronhovde 1048 West James #102 Kent, Washington 98032 RE: ONB Office Building Expansion, N.E. 4th Street (S.E. 128th Street) and Bremerton Avenue (136th Avenue) (Project Number: R;SA 121-88) Dear Mr. Ronhovde: We have completed a preliminary review of the above- referenced application. In order to proceed with the evaluation of the proposed project, we must have the additional information described below: 1. A floor plan which accurately depicts elevations for the existing structure and the proposed structure, and which illustrates the relationship of those elevations. Whereas in elevations the new structure appears to have facade protrusions similar to the existing structures these are not indicated in the plan. This information is necessary in order to fully assess the aesthetic impacts of this project. 2 . A brief statement which describes the rationale for excluding the pilasters which are such a strong thematic part of the existing structure apparently from the proposed structure. This information is necessary in order to assess aesthetic impacts with respect to environmental review. • 3 . A revised site plan which eliminates access from the driveway located on N.E. 4th at the eastern perimeter of the property. .This revision is necessary because 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 Torj an Ronhovde R; SA-121-88 December 28, 1988 Page 2 City staff reports that traffic analysis indicates such access would be unsafe and inefficient. This report is based upon a study of the significant traffic volumes which currently exist, and which are forecast to continue along that corridor. If we receive the above listed materials by January 16, 1989,. we can resume processing of your application. If we do not receive this material by that date, we may return your application having found that it lacks sufficient necessary information to be accepted at this time. In the latter case, you would have to resubmit when the necessary materials are available. If you have any questions, please contact me or Lenora Blauman of my staff, at 235-2550. Sincerely,al) T2) . J Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE/lb:mjp cc: Dennis Dochnal 2006 Redmond Avenue N.E. Renton, Washington 98656 �- /,� /� PA /Ok/ • • Legal description of property (if more space Is required, attach.a separate sheet). 1'f Pw`lc : �i t N E 1/� mu.) W �/ 4 ,oF , IS) _ Q. 230 P. wM, . xGeT Ti-ty 7s Pr TE-m G-IzeoF eKcErr -r bo "Fr t;gc6PT ' T7-i/ - , RTlo7J CoNIV@-(E17. '1D „K s& Co . f R AD AC p (- ,pisED r ecoR D ) 0VE=R AuQtRS1.23 Fr•l& 3 I'1'z 3pit,e0 sxc T Td-tior ' R1 tot cokyve46-0 TO I I CO , P012 Ropy) As cHtsw i t on) gli6o2T R.Ar? tatS .RECoR ocm UNraCR Feu D MA s F•L& :. .. - • y NNINC CITY flF P,—A rs•,., AFFIDAVIT EC 1' S. 1988 ;; : DNA/ RONHOVDE ARCHITECTS City of Renton Building and Zoning Department 200 Mill Street Renton , Wa 98055 re : Office Building Expansion SW Corner of N'.E. 4th and Bremerton Ave . N.E. Rezone Justification The request is to rezone the subject property from OP to B-1 with conditions. The subject property was annexed by the city of Renton in 1986 . The original King County zoning was rm900 when the owner pur- chased the property and constructed the first phase of the pro- ject in 1981. The original zoning would have allowed a setback of 20 feet from Bremerton street. The current OP zoning which re- quires approx . 42 feet setback is unreasonable for professional office use . The change to B-1 zoning is requested to allow the owner to construct an addition to the current building that will match the existing building in scale and character . OP zoning would require a setback of approx. 42 ft. from 136th Ave . Under this zoning the owner could construct a building that is 3 stories tall with approx . 3200 s. f. on each floor . That building would not be in keeping with the scale and character of either the existing building or the neighboring structures. B-1 zoning would allow the owner to construct a 1 story structure of approx . 5200 s. f. that will match the existing bank building currently on the site . The completed project will look like one building . A 1 story structure that will match the existing building would not be cost effective for the owner if he is required to build to the 42 ft. setback required by the OP zoning . The building that the owner proposes to construct will be less intensive , will have better aesthetics, and will be less intrusive to the neighborhood than a three story building constructed within the current OP guidelines. Professional office space is in demand in this area . The owner currently has tenants that have indicated intent to lease 100 percent of the completed project. Professional office space is a less intensive and more desireable use than retail. The property is in an area that is in transition from single family residential uses to more intensive multi-family and commercial uses. The requested rezone would allow the owner to construct a project that will be a good buffer between residential uses to the south and more intensive commercial uses on N.E p 4th . NINE ! ': :il:?� The proposed zoning is consistent with the existing comp eheGglii TON plan and policies. DEC 1 5 i988 r[ 1042 West James St., Suite 103 • kent, WA 98032 • (206) 854-5 lei # YE IL ARCHITECTURE INTERIORS PLANNING / . . ,firOF R�. LU:A. fi- /2/.68 u 4% Q z City of RentonL 1)-_/2/.16 o OMB 9,0 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Ov' i,� SEP Et' Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43,21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for allproposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impacts. Use of Checklist for Nonproject Proposals: (Please Type or Print Legibly) Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. • A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: O A(8 B U/LD/4C 6xP470S, .) 2. Name of applicant: 5(J45ET 5Q0R'E M4A)4 0Eiur" 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact.person: • 7P,°LiC44Jr, sase-, sQU4 Mo%vrr. 4{wA) : D41/1/Roiot(oVDC, 4,ec (,recTS �006, 26--D.MoA)D / VE. A).E. Mfg a). i4M.ES &-r. SU irE /0 3 ' ,PEA)rO/t) t G(J/4 9l6Co CO T �(.()4 �6C� �� (ao6.) ass ��- /6, 4. Date checklist prepared: //A/66 (2oG2) 8S,/-mo6/d S. Agency requesting checklist: 6ry oF ,c);-a,), #1,5)-(r/00 TO A-) 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): aog izOcr/o•) 70 5g. C044P/-ETE GJ/TK/rt) /c1— /1464)7/(5 PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON D DEC 15 1988 9 'L l2 �( r n 4 IF ' r 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansions, or further activity related , to or connected with this proposal? if yes, explain. /lb • • 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. /t/oN&" 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. /OD 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. /� 3ASIG 3Uiz--DM 4 f ERMir5 �3 geaUne D 8Y C_iry of ATDA). 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. 5, ?OO s.F. ADD I-rion) To e4oco s,F. 5A,)t4 33111LD//U6 . Lo i SIZE 1eou0(c,y (0/,(000 s,F. Wrrvl 3? ?m,14I4)6( srAus. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topography map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. Sou-N- r ea,ju z. 6F 'FEW-Se-CT/0 A) OF l 36,171 -A✓E. S.E. /AZ 6,e. l a,5 211 Sy 0 E Y ?FA/TWO /,0R51•(/461ToA) DESSCI2(trIvn) NE A)W Yq oF , /0(4) (y of -roc aF ,-vrE iU(k) Kj of SEC. t5T a3 id) / 6E 5 6- (A) /vt. E) eEPT TKE r,UE5r c 5 FEE" TilE7 E0F FxaEPr m1e E15T 8o F—r rE2co� afe7'T TWIT'� PO on) CoN✓Eyc'D r-o K Jc7 Co- FoR /2o/4D �y a�D -Co 7:) U,�1c�EX? 4UDIro2S FILE #-583/??3 e 4-cso EXcE 7 TKO Pokr<o.v epfui(6-yezm K/n)C Co • Fb2 Ro4D f1-5 SHOWS on) S1-(0R7- PIA-T /1-5 2ECok-2 UA)De-e let44. co . 4 t)DIThI2's A)04,1e' /o29o0?. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one);411:0 rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? /—y 0io c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, call', sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. 5/1TY /vAraet Z , C�R�v 'y 561/-5 ; Sire t44-s BEEF) /MIF'OVEb 1A)ITi? Td PSoIC Pi.4'T/N4 i/t tee*S ,4ND d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. - 2 - • e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. ,)o 6 44/Mg 1720pas D; Ml,Oof E9CC4 -riot P2oP&SED—Dispose- OFFSITE, 47 `DU/;'1P51TE, f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? tubWLY 20ro h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: 4DD ITIO/)4c G4nYD3C/1-f//d4 Witt 3E �izoViv O ,o EX/5Ti/1JGl ; 5Tbk/V1 Dm 4,44E TO 7/E /AM EKISTI'JC 5TOIe' J9/AJ,9G E 5 YST�, 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. /j ,SAL co/osTRx)c.- /0/J poLc1JT4/UTS DUE Tn GoA)S7-24)6T/o/il, 6-)(1-69() i CAAISS/0A)5 (407-0n4or3 /ce-) �v4.6otjf,04 CO n15TI2)G i(&&. b. Are there any off-site sources of emission? A)0 c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Ao/t)E y A)oT 19 PPt-tc ro 3. WATER a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. /1)v 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. /0v 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. Ii)UNE /do i f}Nfgz/G981- - 3 - 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose d and approximately quantities if known. 100 5) Does the proposal lie within) a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. t)O 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. /1)D b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and appaoximately quantities if known. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals . . .; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if 'any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. STdRN� Wm-&-P- KUpbFF ToBE D1 Ve--2.-re- /A)-7-o o -S r 6A-i vR-M Pt r/Oe%G Sys i cam. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. /0v - 4 - d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: 0- ize �x�s i�� 0iJ-5, s72/1( 'Dgiq-/A)79-Ge" Srs yv(, 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen othe) g evergreen tree: i cedar,6' other .Shrubs X. grass o crop or grain o Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other o water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other O other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? -7-0o A--,JD 5o N 9fW 4 4-2Ff{ is ,BE teEA/to Vet). c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. 0/01e ot,J- NEB- -PlerSITE No NE on)-SITE d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: ADD/1-7oA)J T12EEs, 5Ht2U8S /4/11D z-4vim) 4 5 To a E }pp TO E /GTi414 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: Hawk, heron, eagleAongbira, other Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, Pd s, eA°rs, N (ce- Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. /t)OT f}fo-ic1Pvc-E c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. 0,0gitiot/JA) 4-r 7I Is 7-14A-Ed - 5 - d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: a6- 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed projects energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. 01riJMi- GAS 1-/04-0A6 [)4,r; -co 7-1E / o EXrs,r"Jc ME M/M( ckt. sySTENt . ,3uJG2 b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. /t)O c. What kinds of energy conserkation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Ill IS Pkos6C.;r" /tc Exe FED Ufri•s 1106 T-0,0 S,A e/OE-Cy Cc,DL gEQUIRemE7)-r s 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and 'explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. /0v 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. /iJo7 �4P/uG4 ace" 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? ./00 f1 fFcGT /4/tT/e F A evsypol TRAFF'C &D I S C - 6 - 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. 5 Woo To (o:oo r�. SNORT TAM CO.v5T2uG�/o.J /00I E �' LOAZ ' T 6° ,4U7OMOTI tie A)O(SF 8 ®O To `�:oo�•vt,,, 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: iII67.4) AA)D EX/Sypt4 e.A-,AYD SC/-PI/Ut et)/GL 0d FFE-2 /06 I Se- 7D /4-a3-44C2-10 i (j',_o P „ 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? (q/1)K is cdRReio,— Use of E, s; _tat t= No,2Tit ' WI C�l,c�i ,ram�,> Go vn tr/E72c I R C. • SoUTvl VAce=1 J T b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe.. ,OD c. Describe any structures on the site. L/,oOO s 3OiLOIAJ4 d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? 4)o e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? -( Co,)7)TIO1 1e us Fd2 OP zonJE USe f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? 4 + oFPIGE/GOm/-nc=/2C g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? /00r 413°41A8L- h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? o j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: „Jar il-PN/uc/E 8/g - 7 - ' r 1. Proposed measures to ensu le the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans. if any: QRosF r me-ETS /FLL cOkR.e.4r 2 ' ( P U r la/lEN75 1 /fib 15 CD/0 S 151--a'iv i &)rv1 TKF O J 4)1- 3(.1i10iAJ - USE. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. /067" �PPLcc �c� b. Approximately how many .units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. /007- ftee°64 cr'F13 LE c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Nor /t-PP r..-icy9-3L� 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s). not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. c -O FE r ° 13RICK 1Ic,t)EER ( C'-D/b - I D/a)4 b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? / oT , Pet-e 4i3LE c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: ,4tD lTl0n.5 TO Be Y15 Uk-LcY Coi0s is ,—�i y r're-f Ex/s T/414 S7-2UC7-U , 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? (p/1,&14) Col- GIC 1-(TI/04 DUR IA.) V4214/0�5 b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: ,d)o ftil1*C.TS ,Qy)TI LI F4 E-i . 1:7".4e 4 iw 6- 10 i -!Esf-(i7')G tx_GLC, f/, tIC 5/-!/L—Z /JL=� L Grt f SC)cd2CE Lc)vY7I & / /!BS, — 8 - 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? L'rry ef}-p Ks b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. 4)0 c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: ,No NC • Na'T API°'-ICAC, &G 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. for MierCA-6Le b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. /0c r ,gNo A-) c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: /00T }J-PP1-10.13 LE 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. ;1sc EXKTI4k RccESS ' V let VEtatYS TO S.E S.E . / (5 Sri- T 4 70 /SG AYE S. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximately distance to the nearest transit stop? UNNou0/1 c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? 3 ( Rr comOtEPo,J ,)OA)e E�/M1N t d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). /0D - 9 - e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or , air transportation? If so, generally describe. /0O • f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: 15. Public Services a. Would the project result }n an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, bolice protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. /1)D b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. AA)A)6 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: ectricit , natural a Ovate refuse service elephor anitary sewerl septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity wiich might be needed. 646z:7-72/C/ry ,°14 r PoWe-12 / 7-E�6-"Mo.)E — °/IC/FiC /ib2vtli)E5T Bez. C(/,,S. Gdes-,--) 6gs wit srt 1 NCB-ronJ /04-rt)I * GAS d/}rele , SEwe7- — eery of .JroA) /vO OFF-5eT 85.4) eocT/OA.) /S r2e-QWRe-z. • C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: 7.a.,4A-- Name Printed: 764. ,4,J /oN l-fOv Dom' G�ot )14( )HO&O ,NCH [7�--c7r5 /6¢8 w - - — 10 - , . . „ .. ' . . . . . . .. . .. .... ,, . ; . . . . • , . , ,.. . ... . . .. . , , . , . • • • - l !' . . . . ._ •sl'ileY IL . . - . _1 • frfilL11- 1 1 (Flt011-Y : • '\) < . • > --).< IG.-rc'!..m.lt I GTorzi' LI t — '- , •cFnct• 4- a- ,.._, • . . .. • ) _,. , I) L . • . , • , • wia,-41-1)-i • . •- . . .-- - • • - • .2 .. • 1 5rop--r S . I ' • . or4y , _ IsT . ' . . . - : - • . . : --4t . 14 :.E.,:44-714. _ • , • 1 i ,y pi • a ,, , t - pc , . .. .. isT,-) s . . ...,; .. It- • . . •' ' - . . . . ' /GTcfrf . . . . , P•es? . . . . . . ' : .- • . • 4e."1 ' • • , , . . . .... . . . . . . . . . . . . er\ . . . . i. . . . , . , -'- --''''-'i-,: : :: • =i '---_ . .__..c7rfrci.F. ' - _ . ,..i.. ..:.1 ._ . . • _.,._._.,. .. .. ___ . •_ . .. _ _ . _..., _ _ ... _„ : .._. - -.- *, ' . ..---. ...501L.EDItH ., -. . - - - .- . • PIANNIIVG DIVISION . ' , :. - .>4,f:),.e.=,.,,t..1.G!Ot< : • ' . . .- . CITY OF RENTON . . . . . LI DEC 1 5 1988 TO) . . • , . ' '- :.. . : --' • .. ' : • - E C 0 V 11-1! . . . . .. . . . . „ . ...., ,t, . Taiuiamorioa 'Billie Insurance Co THIS SPACE PROVIDED FOR RECORDER'S USE, , A Servioe of ; . . ... . , . • Tr+aneameriaa Corporation 1r • • , . , . Filed for Record at Request of , Name. �- .. : >m . . A.ddreae...L�.,: ..S . .t zr....I l' S — .City and State. 4.— Zot 4 �'�v �' • • Statutory Warranty Deed • THE GRANTOR SAM ZERWOODIS .and DOR:A,. ZERWOODIS, his wife;' •and JAi14E$ WARENAKDS and GEORGINA NARENAKOS, his wife ' ' . for and in consideration of TEN AND NO/100' • DOLLARS ' - • In hand,paid, conveys and warrants to DENNIS DOCIINALIL and BERNADENE DOCHNAi3L, his .wife. the following described real estate, situated in the County of . • King ,•State of ' Washington: ' ' ,The Northwest 1 of the'Northwest 3 of the Northeast 1/4 of the- Northwest. • ' ..1 of Section 15, Township 23 North, Range .5 East, W.M. EXCEPT the West , ' . .7.5 feet thereof; . . AND EXCEPT the East 80 feet thereof; . ' AND EXCEPT that portion .conveyed to King -County for road by Deed . recorded under Auditor's File No. 5831773; . ' EPT all coal and minerals and the right to explore for the mine. ' : • ' • .the same; : , . . , , , , Situate in the :County of King, State of Washington. . • , . ; . . : Subject to: reservations, rights of record This deed is given in fulfillment 4of that certain real estate contract between the parties hereto, dated September 14 , 1976 , and conditioned far the conveyance of the above described property, and, • 'the covenants of warranty herein contained shall not apply to any title, interest or encumbrance arising by, `, ' through or under the purchaser in said contract; and shall not apply to any taxes,'assessments or other charges levied, assessed or.becoming due subsequent to the date of said contract... . Real Estate Sales'Tax was paid on this sale on. 9/16/76 , Rec. No. E#370810 . Dated this 1 th •. day of September ,1976 . .. . -.,- ) t:7° //1.0 .0'42-e-4—) . . p . ail- - ira-k,Q06d1/1 ,.- • • J s Marenakoa • . "S. Ze .d'Ls ........ , � ,« T,r,�zy. 7'.:t' �.�. t:::Gc 1. -.- .ptidfi,c.- corgi Martin os '�' ••DO? Ze c�`is �•� . .....,,.,, ,.' • STATE OF WASHINGTON, : (� q''= •� •a:, ;^ !��,' , r ,`; . p ••t County of king - 'Si':"' ''On this day personally appeared'before me Sam and Dora ,. Zerwoodis and James jand':' 'Georgina Marenakos .• - i • • to me known to be the individual a described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and ' acknowledged that they signed the same as their free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. I • GIVEN ender �d and official seal this ).5.i) day of September ,19.76 ' i LNG DIVISION -j CITY OF RENT ......,c;.: � s-Y .: '.�..��..............' ..... D EC Notary Pwblic is and Or•the�State o/ Washington;, • lam No.w-Isi 5 1988 residing at ;aas,ik ��1.y'1�` e , . 11/11�^V `�"ir 6 . \ �;/ 11 !!// _ . Lit• i�',�f�l�ya, p ��Il • ti• ;$i ��t..LE '�Pe-a DNA/RONHOVDE �,,,� � �''�� �(;''� {�/'� r7 Architects L ETrU� 3 OF UlJ JUWII�.l SLJ CIULJ IL, 1048 West James St. Suit_ _J2 KENT, WA 98032 DrTE JOB 37 (206) 854-5010 ("L 1^� ion ATTENTION / -7J02A flUNi -?e) RE: TO (.sly cF I�7 EL ( D&J CAJ/3 oFl(E i(1/6O//U& Gi<piie};0 0'U PLfIoV IJ1KU�- ©/Ul S/ok) JZG— ;54 ig/—d)$ WE ARE SENDING YOU Attached 0 Under separate cover via the following items: ❑ Shop drawings X Prints ❑ Plans 0 Samples 0 Specifications ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order PA41— COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION `7 1 PRE / /7/4T off' /96.i".J (��=?�1S�IJ /--7 V THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval 0 Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ For your use 0 Approved as noted 0 Submit copies for distribution ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections 0 Return corrected prints ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS fu 1, -R 17,9-7-z--L) /2—Z6 PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON VAN 1 1 1989 ECE1 � � COPY TO SIGNED:/ J A.) PRODUCT240-2 (n e/Inc,Groton,Mao 01411 If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. 1 e CH l/ �l CERTIFICATION OF NOTIFICATION OF ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS/SITE PLAN * * *FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY* * PROJECT TITLE: L:' ; ; OLD NATIONAL BANK EXPANSION APPLICANT: DNA/RONHOUDE ARCHITECTS APPLICATION NUMBER: SITE PLAN, APPROVAL: SA-121-88 The following is a list of adjacent property owners and their addresses. A notification of the pending site plan application shall be sent to these individuals as prescribed by Renton City Code. Chapter 7 Section 38 of Title IV (Building Regulations) of Ordinance No. 162E relating to site plan approval. ASSESSOR'S NAME V ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER SoeE325' 4-5 2S NG' 4It 152 S-go7l-- ac ( JTox-iw Pr. Al-Gx14 1512.6w^l !4og2/ se /2sth /523oS-gt035-O� TL Ev7'off, 1V' c2g oS/ JE,-12.7 hnoi1/43-7"601veeY ¢S' 24, N 4/ 1023c3S -90 37 a4. f2 bk wA 61 'C T'HoiviA5 cAiQJ 31 4,S'66 ivit.5 10 2 3d 5' - l/)7 -0 7 /ZED 6J /wae{ 16.0Sb af,P16&-- U RY 7 6,& / 4-V1 1o23oS-,9c6--cc::, 5EA'7 E j G✓Pt c18,7cg (A)1N R Pe";cE- /2 do S• /°12mD #102 /b2S0 '--91can —06 5EA-774 c�i t'`'09' JS! 4.g CHN2 Les /Z IS '7 14 l dtil � 11:;2 s-- --c), �N r w-A ci A -ES 08107biv 1, lsr64 Ste' 62Np V 152aS-"C0-' 1-06 i70 / al Pr 98oSS PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON DEC i' 5 1988 ASSESSOR'S NAME ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER • I ' - ,ll w d ASSESSOR'S NAME ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER CERTIFICATION I.RO/J HOVG . hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property owners and their addresses were taken from the records of the King County Assessor as prescribed by law. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me. a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing at on the day of SIGNED42k, CERTIFICATION OF MAILING I, , .K. Se.4eotee, hereby certify that notices of the public meeting on the subject site plan approval wordmailed on t 210, 1767 , to each listed adjacent property owner as prescribed by law. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me. a Notary Public..in land for the State of Washington residing, at , ztirn,P.zi 1 on the fO day of ..?n,./ / �? ;64, -- SIGNED: , kl s►e. ye- FORM 208