Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
LUA88-018
PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON SEP 1 3 1990 September 10, 1990 RECEIVE. Don Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works 0 0 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 RE: Compliance with Approved Landscape Development Plans for Heritage Forest Condominium Project Dear Mr. Erickson: This morning I met Kevin Kalbrenner of Landscape Development Company at the site of Heritage Forest Condominiums to review his compliance with the recommendations in my August 24, 1990 letter to you. Generally, he was to adjust the irrigation system, replace dead plant material and in two areas add groundcover plants. From my inspection, I feel that Mr. Kalbrenner has responded to the items in my August 24th letter and that the installed landscape and irrigation system reflects the intent of the approved plans. If you have any questions concerning my inspection, please give me a call. Sincerely, DAVID EVANS A D SOCIATES, INC. Charles A. Warsinske, ASLA Manager of Landscape Architecture DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES,INC. ENGINEERS,SURVEYORS,PLANNERS,LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS,SCIENTISTS OFFICES IN OREGON,WASHINGTON AND CALIFORNIA 301•116TH AVENUE S.E.,SUITE 170 BELLEVUE,WASHINGTON 98004-6477 (206)455-3571 FAX(206)455-3061 David Evans and Associates, Inc. 301 - 116th Avenue SE, Suite 170 1`LL' 11�.57 c J Bellevue, WA 98004-6477 41 ; PPS ,n. S r [2 SEP .,,A-n,'ACTH, • Don Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Work 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 411 • 11!!![1!lltil!!lt�tl;ll"ti!!lliliti�lli��!!!f!�!�!1!� -U ►8 88 August 24, 1990 PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON SEP -- 4 1990 Don Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator RECEIVED City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 RE: Compliance with approved landscape development plans for Heritage Forest Condominium project Dear Mr. Erickson: On August 14, 1990, at 9:00 AM, I met Kevin Kalbrenner of Landscape Development Company at the site of Heritage Forest Condominiums,located on N.E.5th Street in Renton. Mr. Kalbrenner was the landscape contractor for this project and installed the plant material and irrigation system. Generally, the site appeared to be in a reasonably clean and neat condition. The trees were staked and secured per accepted practices and most were in a thriving condition. Throughout the project, substitutions were made for several species of shrubs and trees due to the lack of availability of quality plant material at the time of planting. The material substituted reflects the size, number and condition of plant material specified on the plans. There are three areas where groundcovers are called for on the plans and were not evident in the field. These are: 1. East of Building"E" between the building and the wooden retaining wall. 156 SF or 39 four-inch pots of Vinca minor are shown on the plans. This area very narrow off of several patios. It receives very little natural light and is currently covered with three to four inches of gravel. In this location, this is an appropriate substitution. 2. Northwest corner of Building'B" approximately 150 SF or 24 four inch pots of Ajuga repens are shown on the plans. These should be installed. 3. Northwest corner of Building"D"approximately 152 SF or 31 four-inch pots of Vinca minor are shown on the plans. These should be installed. On the east and south sides of the property, four Douglas firs ranging from 18" to 36" are shown as existing. These were not located during the site visit and it is assumed that they were removed during site preparation. The landscape contractor indicated that he did not remove these trees. The plans call for a number of rockeries which were not found during the site visit. One rockery was substituted with a wood retaining wall on the east side of building E. It was DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES,INC. ENGINEERS,SURVEYORS,PLANNERS,LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS,SCIENTISTS OFFICES IN OREGON,WASHINGTON AND CALIFORNIA 301•116TH AVENUE S.E.,SUITE 170 BELLEVUE,WASHINGTON 98004.6477 (206)455-3571 FAX(206)455.3061 • r i Don Erickson, AICP August 24, 1990 Page 2 noted during the inspection,that rockeries were unnecessary to hold the slope at the locations shown on the plans due to grading of the planting beds. (With the exception of the east side of Building E where the wood retaining wall is located.) Several plants were not in a good growing condition when the site visit was made. These include four dead Douglas fir on the southwest side of the property and one dead Bradford pear between Buildings "C" and"D". These and any other plants which are not in a thriving condition should be replaced with the same species and size as called for in the approved plans. On the south side of Buildings B, C, and D, sod has been installed in place of Hypericum calcium a low groundcover off of the patios. This appears to be a reasonable substitution as the sod will allow pedestrian traffic were the Hypericum will not. The irrigation system was tested by zone and it's performance observed. The installation varies somewhat from the plans but placement of heads and the coverage seemed to reflect the intent of the design. However, adjustment of the system is needed to keep spray on the planted areas and off of the sidewalks, parking lots, adjacent properties and streets. This adjustment should also ensure that coverage of all planting areas is received. Overall the system appears to be in good working order with the exception of adjustments and the following areas: 1. One head on the east side of Building "A"was buried and needs to be raised. 2. In the areas between Building B and C and C and D, over watering is apparent and this zone needs to be adjusted. 3. The planted areas at the indentation of Building "E" on the west side also needs the coverage adjusted, as some plants are-receiving too much water, while others are receiving no water at all. With the above improvements made, it is my opinion that the installed landscape and irrigation system reflects the intent of the approved plans. If you have any questions concerning my inspection, please give me a call. 74, ... Sincerely, ) /ASSOC�AIfINCA EVANharles A. arsinske, ASLA STA OF Manager of Landscape Architecture WAS N ON REGI:TF.RED IS AP RCHIT CT DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES,INC. ENGINEERS,SURVEYORS,PLANNERS,LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS,SCIENTISTS CHARLES A. WARSINSKE CERTIFICATE NO. 423 CITY )F RENTON • Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann, Administrator August 2, 1990 Todd Bennett Heritage Community Builders 11061 N.E. 2nd Street, Suite 111 Bellevue, WA 98004 SUBJECT: Irrigation and landscaping compliance Dear Mr. Bennett: The purpose of this letter is to inform you that with the leaving of Jerry Lind to Issaquah, we do not currently have anyone on staff capable of carrying out a detailed landscape/irrigation review. Although we are recruiting for a code compliance officer at the present time, it may be a while before we have someone on board. In order to expedite your being issued your full occupancy permits, I would recommend that Heritage Community Builders hire a registered landscape architect to carry out an inspection and prepare a written report on their findings. This report should be directed to me or Jim Hanson, the new Development Services Manager. As soon as we receive the report and have had an opportunity to review it, we will make a decision on your occupancy request. If you have any questions, please get in touch with me as soon as possible. Don Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator cc: Ron Nelson DE:kac 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2631 f /61-)k, R1/-e -t : ' - - CITY OF RENTON BUILDING DIVISION INSPE TION RECORD i__TIFWL,_ INSPECTOR ID REQUEST DATE .7 ?7I PERMIT NO. 1�/ O / 16// A.M. da /INSPECTION DATE P.M. ADDRESS �IQ/J - `7zz i �� �S BLDG. # JOB OLUMN GRID LINES CONTRACTOR1‘?6, 141 63I- l OWNER /f 1 a--53 SHONE CONTACT FRMG FTG FDN INSU , ROUGH-IN CEILING FINAL OTHER ( CA-9 INSPECTOR COMMLe--"' TS CHECK HERE IF INSPECTION IS APPROVED [ - ] CDVb1d114 6/90 (#3:inspect) CHECK HERE IF PROJECT FINAL [ ] :IAN 1 6 1990 �, HERITAGE COMMUNITY'BUILDERS, • . . January 13, .1990, .. •, - : Don. Erickson City, of 'Renton- '200 Mill 'Avenue' `South , ` • • Renton. WA' • _ RE-: Carports- , .. , • Heritage 'Forest : ' • - A •28. Unit 'Apartment ,Community " , Renton, 'WA" -The, purpose•I o.f; ,this letter,. r; .: '.' » �.• � : ' •"' %:: ', ^ ,_.`• .':.,. -is to_ confirm with, you the • conversation we-had with. you 'last week regarding ;carports..:, ' ' ,_ ,Enclosed'.please ;find the• following, documents ' Site `Plan, ••- "This` plan- shows -tour `actual carport' ,locations. We: are' l'annin a `total 'of•2 p 8 carports _(�1.1 per."unit)'.,, P' , g ,: ' Elevation/Cross Section The cross' sections have ' • ,'; :been, ,revised ' to ',reflect flat; roof carports- when • • they: are located ;near. _buildings h r• ); provide We would.: appreciate it' if you would- ' :' us- a -Short , • letter confirming i your- 'approval ,;of; these 'actual- carport locations' and the design,-as indicated on .-the' enclosed �'� drawings., ,, We' ,are also, submitting ;'plans .sets`' .to . the,- building' : = department' for -building_'review. '.Receipt of.,'_your- .confirmation. letter by •January. 25th , would_ , be. ,greatly:.appreciated. :,1.1061 N:E:2nd'St,'Suite 111 • Bellevue,WA98004'• (206)646-8846'• FAX(206) 646-8856` ' ' • 1• - - • • • ., �,.. • - , . ': Dona Erickson�: ; . _ • _ ... ; ; -- .. - ,'� : - - _ � - City of, Renton: . • - • January 13:;, •1990 ' , Page Two ., Ifou (have ,an ,questions or -y y: �guif 'further information- is. required, :please let us, know.. 'Sincerely, . odd` R: Bennett President , B:lf/,.HC/11289 t =Enclosures, : , cc.: Reed' Cahill = David Reed. Cahill Architects, P.S. 2"637 77th Place :N.E. .. Bellevue,,''WA 98004 Greg Moller 'J.M': Rafn Construction P.O: Box 4229 Bellevue, WA 98009 ; FISA-m0l8 `8$ LIE ALLIED BUILDING PRODUCTS CORP. 7100 212TH STREET,SW•EDMONDS•WASHINGTON•98020 (206)776-4600 PUNNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTOIJ November 6, 1989 NOV 1 71989 Mr. Donald Erickson Q{�]V® �C{ City of Renton g « Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 9'8055 Re: Consideration of Approval for use of Vinyl Siding on "Heritage Forest Apartments" by J.M. Rafn Company. Dear Mr. Erickson: Manufacturer clarification and warranty of color retention re- garding vinyl siding is being sent to your attention as requested. This information will address your expressed concern regarding discoloring of a particulr vinyl siding project that you recently inspected. One of the first and oldest multi-family projects to use vinyl siding in the Northwest was "Quiet Forest" in Federal Way. Phase I was constructed ten years ago using vinyl siding. Phase III was just recently completed using the same brand of vinyl siding with no visual or noticeable difference in color, panel quality, or4ppearance. Please consider inspecting this project as an ex- ample of quality material and installation. I am confident that you will note a marked difference from the project of dubious quality that you personally recently viewed. This project is loc- ated at 328th. and 1st. Avenue South in Federal Way. Details and recommended installation techniques have been sent to J.M. Rafn so that a quality vinyl siding job can be realized. Your time and consideration afforded to us at our recent meeting was appreciated. Sinc rely, , 10-41,40‘C im Williams cc: G. Moler Y , :HERITAGE COMMUNITY'BUILDERS, INC: • ; • - November;17:; 1.989 ' .. ' • . " 1 Don Erickson • )' FAX •235-2513 • City of ^Renton S PLAN NG®IVB • 200th Mill ':Ave. South = IOftI. Renton, WA . 98055 _ CIT1!OF�EhlT01`d, , , NOV-2 1, 1989 ; RE: '.-Heritage Forest . . ' ,.A-'28 Unit Apartment-Coznmuriity :Renton,, WA _ - LtU IVE 4 • }. ; Dear_'Don.: . , = '.. _ . { We'_have enclosed our .planned Vinyl/Siding Specification ' for-the referenced.' , project '(Exhibit'A)•,,; .The siding material ', ' , "is-'-.the ,same' material"we reviewed` in our meeting .with •you.-` • • - - Our-- installation:method, will, involve , covering all. outside ,corners'=:off ;each`building with- wood corner,' boards to protect these areas: • We plant to' order the material -on. Tuesday,, 'November' .21, •1989-' and expect. 'to• begin, installation, in the; next- two weeks. To facilitate -our--•Planning-'and to _,keep- all our records,'up to ; 'date,".we'Would-,appreciate_it if ,you would review sthe, enclosed specifications -and provide us-'your 'comments ,and/or • . - ,approVal..b Tueseda November,'.21 -1989. :If 'you, have'' any questions`or,' if ':further, -information . is,' - ' required;' please let us know: .. Siric` yely►` - 'Add. R. Beinett • President ;Enclosures .. • ; • TRB;'jf\BCB\1097.4` : - • - -' • 1106t,N.E. 2nd St.,'Suite 111 Bellevue;_WA 98004 ••,(206)•646-8846•i FAX(206) 646-8856 , HERITAGE FOREST APARTMENTS RENTON, WASHINGTON VINYL SIDING SPECIFICATIONS The following description is an outline of the specification for application of vinyl siding at the Heritage Forest Apartments in Renton, Washington. The siding material is Royal Crest Journey/Mann Double 4 inch, .042 Mil siding with a simulated woodgrain finish in a Royal Sand color. The material is a bevel overlap style applied horizontally. The siding is placed over 7# building paper on 5/8" gypsum sheathing attached to 2x6 studs at 16" O.C. At the top of each wall surface, the siding will be inserted into a vinyl "u" channel against the rafter blocking. At the outside corners of each building the siding ends will be covered by 1x3 and 1x4 wood corner boards running vertically and finished in a contrasting light accent color. At the inside corners of the buildings an "L"shaped vinyl channel in the Royal Sand color will cover the intersecting siding ends. All places where vinyl siding meets railing wall caps, chimney flue caps, flat soffits and other architectural features, trim in the special vinyl trim parts will be used in the Royal Sand color. All roof overhangs and flat soffit areas will be of wood material to match the siding color. BCB\10966 HERITAGE COMMUNITY BUILDERS, INC. • January 13, 1990 , ; • ' - Don-Erickson - - :COURIER ' , City of' Renton ' _ . , . 200' Mill Avenue South ,., , . - ' ' PAs NING DIVISION ' Renton, WA 9 8 0 55 , • , ' GITI'OF RENTON " • RE: Siding Material - JAN 1 51990 , "Heritage Forest A 28 Unit Apartment Community , " R' Eg Renton, WA � Dear .Don _ Under letter- dated• November 17, , 1989, we confirmed with you the, siding 'material we discussed With you., We also received your verbal approval. 'We, ;also enclosed fairly , ' detailed siding specifications We have' since installed the _ siding material. ; , To facilitate our building permit sign-,off, we would appreciate , it if you would provide ' us ' a , brief letter - indicating, your, written approval of these actual siding specifications. ' ' Receipt of your , confirmation letter .by ',January 25th " wotr'ld' be 'greatly appreciated. If 'you have any questions or if further information is ' ' ' required, : please let: us know. ' Sincceerely, / nett d R.esident - ' ' TRB:lf/HC/11290, .. , • - ' 11061 N.E. 2nd St:, Suite 111, 1 Bellevue,WA 98004 • (206) 646-8846.•• FAX(206) 646-8856 _, r ,..6 :.,, '~ j 4 ' ®,. CITY OF RE'NTON ,. '_ HEARING EXAMINER Earl Clymer, Mayor Fred J. Kaufman November 14, 1989 CITY OF RENTON IYUV 141988 James A. Goerg Union 600 Condo Association RECEIVED P. 0. Box 531 CITY CLERK'S OFFICE Renton, Washington 98057 • Re: Rezone and Site Approval 018-88 Heritage Forest Apartments Dear Mr. Goerg: I have reviewed your letter of November 13, 1989 regarding the above matter. I regret to inform you that this office does not have any jurisdiction to enforce conditions imposed as a result of land use review. You have sent a courtesy copy to the appropriate agency, the Building Division, which does review permit conditions. I have also taken the liberty of forwarding a copy of your letter to the Mayor's Office. If determinations regarding implementation of the permit are inappropriate you may have certain appeal rights pursuant to Section 4-3011(A) (3) . . You may also have private legal remedies which this office cannot explore. If this office can be of further assistance, please feel free to write. Sincerely, iVe."/"`L'" FRED J. KAUFMAN HEARING EXAMINER . FJK/dk cc: Eaxl Clymer, Mayor ity Clerk 1 • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2593 . Fivtdtl....tittli, • . e . , .. , . ___ • • • . , .. .. . . , , .•� ,` - - Mel - • - amp r r�L • =titleCONDO C. �� r• I M v . November 13, 1989 . •Mr. Fred J. Kaufman Hearing Examiner . City of Renton 200 Mill Ave. South Renton, WA 98055 , • Re: File No: R-018-88 and. SA-018088 and •ECF-018-88 (Heritage Forest Apartments) Dear Mr. Kaufman: . It is with great vigor thatwe request you issue an order to cease all construction of the HERITAGE ' FOREST APARTMENTS and we also request that you hold a public hearing to consider whether BENNETT COMMUNITY BUILDERS be allowed to continue construction completion of this,project. Our reasons for these requests are as follow: Threats against homeowners of ajoining properties (see city of Renton Police Department Case Number 89-11108) • Improper use of ajoining homeowners•utilities • • Improper use of adjoining homeowners driveway access • • Extensive construction damage to ajoining homeowners properties Construction hours have not been limited to comply with conditions imposed' by the ERC • There has been minimal street cleanup during construction operations, therefore not complying with • • conditions imposed by the;ERC The proposed fencing has not been installed therefore the construction impact has been maximized rather . than minimized .Construction debris and litter has been widespread throughout the neighborhood and the homeowners have been forced to do the cleanup Uncovered manhole covers leading to possible injury to neighborhood children and/or homeowners Construction workers dogs (sometimes 3 or more) allowed to roam the neighborhood forcing homeowners to do that.cleanup also • . If you have any question regarding these allegations, please contact me days at 271-3353 and you may wish to contact Renton Police Sergeant John Pavone who viewed and talked to the construction workers on Sunday, - T�� - NE" II RENTOWi45HIN . . tiff. : ,• • -' CONDO ASSOC. a AM SUM allia.a. tee o . IIMM t Mr. Fred Kaufman • • November 13, 1989 ' Page TWo November 12, 1989. We request your immediate attention on this matter and feel confident you will consider the ajoining property homeowners in your review. • We await your response. S• cerely ames A. Goerg Homeowner/President Union 550 Condo'Association Nikki Nisco • • Vice Pres/Treas Union 600 Condo Association CC: Renton City Council Building and Zoning Dept. Economic Review Committee • • • • • - NE' REatoi WQSHINGY BC1 • -oig-gam • ,_ ., °'} OCT 1 6, 1989 • • �•, ,. • 'r ill'- } ' ; - 1 , '' ,-'- -' r _r - BENNETT C OM MUNITY BUILDERS, INC.` ` 'October✓ 16', '198,9 'z 4. . .' Don_ Erickson ' ' Courier City of :Renton V 200 ,Mill 'Avenue'"South w. Renton, WA 98055. ` RE: Heritage• : Forest Apartments' a 28 Unit' Apartment Community: f Renton, 'Washington r Dear; Don: ; • You and I have beep exchanging calls •this ,past week, , and ;I thought ':it would be, worthwhile for Me-to :put,down my 'discussion topics with you'. 'in writing. _ The ':referenced project overall appears to ,be proceeding - - quite well. .," We have two potential changes to the proj ect, ' - that we'would appreciate',your, consideration. of: • These changes- are.'as'• summarized below:'` = ' .7 Carports ' - The project as',`approved''pr`.ovides ,for a ;total{.;of twelve,<12> ',units of carport parking. We have-'. " • completed, a: recent market review,'in, the area and feel , additional carport parking stalls would be appreciated ' • • - ' • . , ' •„ by our.potential tenants. Accordingly, . we' would,like-' .to .request'. your approval of up to ,sixteen. <16>' ,additional carports. to .permit: assignment_ of, one carport :, parking space to- each unit. To facilitate 'your.,review,' we have included a 'site, drawing and `identified the , ' '- potential.=locations'.for the additional carport stall' - areas_. We feel.'-the planned locations would be a nice , benefit to the visual' appeal`'o f the"project because the', carport structures. themselves would provide a visual , _ transition- from the parking surface, to the. building - • mass. The new stalls would also be located the • furthest distance_'from N.E. 5th Street,- which would 11061;N.E:2rid.St:,,Suite 111 Bellevue;WA 98004 • (206)'646-8846 • FAX(206)'646-8856 • Rage Two ... F Don' Erickson October 16:, 1989 _ • minmze "of: the. structures ,from this" access:, .. road: '' Siding` Material - tide have completed;a' review. Of • available -siding-'.materials'- for-';the:project: ;We, - s reviewed cedar. siding a, Board`<a' composite wood product ,that; nooks like:,cedar; siding>:,:and vinyl•siding. •• , We; plan: to own' this property' for.' a long. time', and''we are looking, for a :-long: life.:product' that hasgood long term .wear. characteristics The+:, itf.'''condominium 'projects, - •, va't:.c�.F ........, a ir�:c.c 1 j a.ia :.�"ir: -llo '..ail•: E�iiu.; j do n to the' Of 'the site lboth, have;"vinyl siding. `:Although '.these projects''-were constructed-',many years: 'ago, the,, - sidng .still looks:virtually =new. •. ,The,-apartment • project `Located `adjacent' 'to, the:east 'of ,our`"site has , • •cedar" sidin material. Although; this:,proj'ect, `was • 'completed less than •a=, year= :ago:, we 'can.visually • - • dent fy :'places where ,it_ is` becoming, weathered',, :and unless.-thee'siding is''`maintained properly, ;We.are-: ' - • • ' 'Concerned. this:•project-"-might:begin--to look weathered • over time,:. • ' "Based. upon••-our- review, and:' long;'terd obj.ectives;•.:we would. appreciate• if I you;would."'consider;'-approval • vinyl siding: for :our,'project:.`• ,We feel vinyl,- siding' - will b`e; compatib'le`w h, :our.'westerly and',northerly neighbors and•-will be a,- better looking ;project ;over, •' ' time°as' already'`demonstrated'by- the' projects. surrounding;=;us:_ If 'required, we would 'be happy:, to , submit to.syou;•.approval .,of: our:,;color scheme;,::the actual, siding•,product -"etc: ,are 'all concerned that. the •• • : •pro`ject<'maintains`:`a..'.good::appreciation' over' time: .``We , • : " feel this'•,product.'--will."accomplish this. - To facilitate our=.plans, we: would appreciate a =response • and/or ,meeting with-:''you. •.on._.these ,two topics by,r:Friday`; - October ;20, -1989: • Feel free. t:o.. cal'l ;if•.you' have=`any:questions.;or- if• ,further =information,;is requ' red: - sincerelyy ' _ Enclosure = i ' 1 I I I I i I i I 1 I ----------I _1 I , - 4 I sipcI 'V �..4r� 0 rvrvd7d I t ,, , r4 „, � 6 & ., n i �x. ss�,vo^3 ' E. 5 th gREET- P R/7=�Q4G• 5(EXISTNG) t //�T!%i9425 - � ;�' i i SCALE-1 -EAT mis i__ _ . -. _ - fx RGHE9 ` �71 =�-1''-....._,__. FC_ —__ iETENTOVTANf ' 3fLf ! f , - in • � 'CARftRT m00C / \/ WLu11115,(TYr) o • ), . 0 . 1; . z,F , 0 \ ��. ,, I r � • l, 1i , • rn• r m 111 1/ YAI :1 I y 6• ;.'\ 6 ETir 1°1/11 , , . , , s',.. ''..„, ; ,, yi.„_,...,-wooD ma I if Ai : I1 i ' , A IP' A -1 Ai,' . I r v +--_ ., 6.T !, I a ' •, .111iism••— wilt . =, ., • 1 , .. 5 -1 i , , I.'. k — --- ,,. • . .. , F, f1Al@bOXES i • �, 2,408 ;' • 1 Cl iPSTER • • RAILKOAD TEE ,1 • '• `- $" WTR e• - svc, IF : - .. INIr WILL. } = r'Tj ' MEM �/� sv� I x =MK eir"•� f c 407 I \ s. I' N rn s`c 8: I 401s Aid ! vJ . iiPIq, Jt i 1 6_ I,,` co �, N �`�. It OQ • p43 r L ' u --- - T� _ 6 f�. ---'®�-- ----rr t Z �,T, 405 ce �— _ �\ , 404 i pi CITY OF RENTON '" PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Traffic Engineering Division PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON 0 March 8, 1989 ® MAR 9 1989 Mr. Todd R. Bennett, President Bennett Community Builders, Inc. 5729 Lake View Drive Kirkland, WA 98033 Subject: Heritage Forest Apartments R-018-88 SA-018-88 Dear Mr. Bennett: Your correspondence dated February 8, 1989, to Kenneth E. Nyberg has been forwarded to our office for. review. Upon review of item #2 in the plans review submittal we do concur with the limited traffic mitigation fee of $404.00. The $197.00 (for a total of $27,284.00) for the North 3rd/North 4th Street corridor fee was applied prematurely. We will request the Community Development Department to remove this comment from your plans review submittal . Very truly yours, Gary A. Norris, P.E. Traffic Engineer CEM:ad cc: lr Erickson CEM057 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2620 Facsimile (206) 235-2513 t% ® CITY OF RENTON • PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Traffic Engineering Division MEMORANDUM PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON MAR 9 1989 DATE: March 8, 1989 ECEIVE TO: Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator FROM: Gary Norris,O raffic Engineer SUBJECT: Heritage Forest Apartments R-018-88/SA-018-88 P1an Review Comments Please delete item number 2 on the plan review comments dated 1-12-88. This is in reference to a mitigation fee of $27,284.00. This fee has been applied prematurely and should not affect this development. CEM:ad Attachment CEM056 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2620 CITY OF RENTON,WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO.4199 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF REN- TON, WASHINGTON CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN _ PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF REN- TON FROM G-1 (GENERAL USE) TO R-3 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION SE) (BE NETT COMMUNITY BUIILD DIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL RS,`INC -FILE NO. R-018-88). 1ludre ,ieriner WHEREAS, under Chapter 7, Title IV y No. ,beingfirst dulysworn on oath states 1B28 known Regulations)theC ef of Ordinance General rdi 1628 as the "Code Ordi- that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the nances of the City of Renton," as amend- ed, and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the property herein- below described has heretofore been VALLEY DAILY NEWS zoned as G-1 (General Use);and WHEREAS, a proper petition for cnange • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition of zone classification of said property has been filed with the Planning Division on or Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week.That said newspapers about June 22, 1988, which petition was are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six duly referred to the Hearing Examiner for monthsprior to the date ofpublication referred to,printed andpublished investigation,Pulistudy,riand public hearing, and a Public Hearing having been held in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King thereon on or about September 27, 1988, County,Washington.The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal and said matter rinhaving been duly, andc said ered by the Hearing Examiner, said newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for zoning request being in conformity with the King County. city's comprehensive plan, as amended, and the city council having duly considered all matters relevant thereto, and all parties The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the Kent Edition having been heard appearing in support Renton Edition X thereof or in opposition thereto: Auburn Edition (and not in NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUN- supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers CIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASH- INGTON,duringthe below statedperiod.The annexed notice a T NO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I: The following described Ordinance No. 4199 property in the City of Renton is hereby rezoned to R-3 (Medium Density Residen- was published on January le, 1989 R3334 tial Use), as hereinbelow specified, subject to the findings, conclusions, and decision of the Hearing Examiner dated October 10, 1988; the Planning Manager is hereby authorized and directed to change the The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the maps of the Zoning Ordinance, as amend- ed,to evidence said rezoning,to-wit: sum of $ ., 7 _c}U See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made part hereof as if fully set forth herein. (Said property, 1.22 acres,being located on the south side N.E. 5thStreet the 4200 block anddeastt of UnionnAvenue N.E.) SECTION II: This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and five days after its publication. Subscribed and sworn to before me this 19 thda of January 19 8 9 PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this Y 9th day of January 1989. Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 9th day of January 1989. Earl Clymer, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J.Warren, City Attorney Exhibit"A" Notary Public for the State of Washington, Legal description of property: The east residing at Federal Way, 268 feet of the south 198 feet of the north King County, Washington. 629 feet of the northwest 1/4 of the south- west 1/4 of Section 10, Township 23 north, VDN#87 Rev,sed 11 86 range 5 east W.M. Situate in the City of Renton, County of King,State of Washington. Published in the Valley Daily News Janu- ary 13, 1989.R3334 January 9. 1989, Renton City Council Minutes _. Page 7 Ordinance #4199 An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of property located Rezone: Bennett on the south side of NE 5th Street at the 4200 block and east of Union Community Builders, Avenue NE from G-1, general zone, to R-3, medium density multifamily Inc., R-018-88 zone, for Bennett Community Builders, Inc., R-018-88. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. - Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke presented a report recommending approval of the following resolution: Resolution #2748 A resolution was read amending Resolution No. 2735 establishing the Aquifer Utility: Aquifer Protection Area (APA) and amending the legal description to modify the Protection Map (Paccar northern boundary of Zone 2 on property owned by PACCAR. MOVED BY Adjustment) TRIMM, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Vacation: VAC-87-005, Ways and Means Committee Chairman Trimm presented a report N. 52nd Street/Ripley recommending that the two appraisals for the Ioppolo street vacation of N. Lane, Ioppolo 52nd Street and Ripley Lane be referred to the Community Services Committee. The Ioppolo's appraisal was $2,500 and the City's was $86,500. The Committee further recommended that Mr. Ioppolo be notified of the meeting. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Vouchers Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke presented a report recommending approval of Vouchers 57512 through 57858 in the amount of $1,163,240.52, having received departmental certification that merchandise/services have been received or rendered; Vouchers 57518-57520 machine voided. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECONDED BY KEOLKER- WHEELER, COUNCIL APPROVE THE VOUCHERS AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS Councilwoman Keolker-Wheeler reported that during discussion of the 1989 King County: King budget, it was determined that Council would delay contributing to the King County 2000 County 2000 program until input was received from the King County 2000 Committee. Since information has now been received, it was MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL FUND KING COUNTY 2000 IN THE AMOUNT OF $500. CARRIED. Executive Session MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL CONVENE INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSS LAND USE ACQUISITON. CARRIED. Time 8:45 p.m. Council reconvened into regular session; roll was called; all members present as previously shown. ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL ADJOURN. CARRIED. Time: 8:54 p.m. MAXINE E. MOTOR, CMC, City Clerk Recorder: Marilyn Petersen, CMC 01/09/89 , WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT JANUARY 9, 1989 ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following ordinances for second and final reading: Renton Family Practice Center Rezone Ordinance (R-001-88) from R-3 to B-1 - 8 lots totaling .92 acres located at the nw corner intersection of S 5th St & Williams Ave S, 411-435 Williams Ave N Rezone for Bennett Community,Builders, Inc. R-018-88 (Heritage Forest Apartments) The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following resolution for reading and adoption: Amending Resolution #2735 Establishing the Aquifer Protection Area and Amending the Legal Description STREET VACATION (VAC-87-005), N. 52ND STREET/RIPLEY LANE, IOPPOLO (Referred 5/2/88) APPRAISER FOR N. 52ND STREET END VACATION (Referred 8/15/88) The Ways and Means Committee recommends that this matter be referred to the Community Services Committee for review of the difference in the appraisal amounts. The Ioppolo's appraisal was $2,500 and the City's was $86,500. It is further requested that Mr. Ioppolo be notified of the meeting. APPROVAL OF VOUCHERS The Ways and Means Committee recommends approval of Vouchers No. 57512 through No. 57858 in the amount of $1,163,240.52; having received departmental certification that merchandise/services have been received or rendered; Vouchers No. 57518 through No. 57520 machine voided. Richard Stredicke, Chairman Kathy K olker-Wheeler 4- - . Department of Assessments ATTENTION: Abstract Section - Al Martin F 709F King County Administration Building O R4 A Seattle, WA 98104 A. .•/ OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK '., do O PUBLIC RECORDS DIVISION c) t, ® z • o lel o The attached material comes to you in 1•0 t' response to your recent request. 0,9gT0 SEP-C Ordinance No. 4198 & 4199 January 11, 1988 , CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVENUE SOUTH —���e v ' ,J RENTON, WA 98055 PHONE (206) 235-2500 • • Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk - • • '.,::so-: ..-. T _ YY• _ • .. ._ �<a ..� . .ice _ i _• • i • i • • • - • j • s IP • to ilatt..z CITY OF RENTON isi1 FINANCE DEPARTMENT UMW Earl Clymer, Mayor Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk January 11, 1989 Todd R. Bennett, President Bennett Community Builders 5729 Lake View Drive Kirkland, Washington 98033 Re: Bennett Community Builders, Inc. - R-018-88 and SA-018-88 Dear Mr. Bennett: The Renton City Council at its regular meeting of January 9, 1989, adopted Ordinance No. 4199 changing the zoning classification of certain properties within the City of Renton from G-1 to R-3 . A copy of the ordinance is attached for your records. Please contact this office if you have further questions.. Yours truly, CITY OF RENTON Maxine E. Motor, CMC City Clerk cc: Planning Division-Zoning Hearing Examiner Enclosures 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2501 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 4199 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM G-1 (GENERAL USE) TO R-3 (MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL USE) (BENNETT COMMUNITY BUILDERS, INC. - FILE NO. R-018-88) WHEREAS, under Chapter 7, Title IV (Building Regulations) of Ordinance No. 1628 known as the "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, " as amended, and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the property hereinbelow described has heretofore been zoned as G-1 (General Use) ; and WHEREAS, a proper petition for change of zone classification of said property has been filed with the Planning Division on or about June 22, 1988, which petition was duly referred to the Hearing Examiner for investigation, study, and public hearing, and a Public Hearing having been held thereon on or about September 27, 1988, and said matter having been duly considered by the Hearing Examiner, and said zoning request being in conformity with the city's comprehensive plan, as amended, and the city council having duly considered all matters relevant thereto, and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I: The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby rezoned to R-3 (Medium Density Residential Use) , as hereinbelow specified, subject to the findings, conclusions, and decision of the Hearing Examiner dated October 10, 1988; the 1 ORDINANCE NO. 4199 u Planning Manager is hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to evidence said rezoning, to-wit: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein. (Said property, 1 .22 acres, being located on the south side of N.E. 5th Street at the 4200 block and east of Union Avenue N.E. ) SECTION II: This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and five days after its publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 9th day of January , 1989. Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 9th day of January , 1989. ZEar A er, M r Appro as to form: alumeto. Lawrence J. Wa en, City Attorney Date of Publication: January 13, 1989 ORD. 69-11/9/88-as. 2 • ORDINANCE NO. 4199• • • • Exhibit "A" i Legal description of property (if more space Is required, attach a separate sheet). The east 268 feet of the south 198 feet of the north 629 feet of the northwest 1/4 of the southwest 1/4 of the southwest 1/4 of SPctinn 10 . Township 23 north. range 9 Past W.M_ ; Situate in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington. • • • 1, Hair• +' --- l�88// 32 W �- . N. . 1 ,» trN RR- /-3Z W Co/d.88 "� • is • ;,r mi 880930 • "" N10N. 600 CONDO. VOL. 65/33-36 �'0 0-16° Di, . . .". ,." 1 'It, I '0.,1 1 rYtY i, ' ,.,r! %✓_-//-SZ W • 3-94.6.3 !« h 0 ; p. • I `` I in,. iro.errs uviow:4;ov/►GfT Yoz !o/B ,(1�8=/!•3 « r ' �I;:I F. ;:+n. /P3I9la 2W' `c48.63 °N:E. 5TH ST. o �. .�: ..,.. •..1'.,! "A'88-1/-32 W°t1!y'e18.55(P) 'r:. • �T' �. • � 3/•4.37 !!. !!! �v . -17' o. ..,:.:: CON ; :uN , • Ira' 4 • �.1 L, • '.;1}k�..." 5 !✓ea9-//-dt/(/:: . 1Z9.9.9 !! ` Av� r. • ilb to [/{� 14• 1 '"'t Q'T •i 1 'I' 'II" ' C, k N REN SR -83 t 3 0 6�° ' m' g ; 4'( l' l v./'8 Ne8-/l-32W �t) At"• 60• I .' i•' til ti i' .840305900 , �o o 0 o sr; •r ' 1•• '':• � ' :'re999 1}:e8-//-3t/✓ . ?!Ofe9.87.„ ''' • r • • ,•NO:a7 ' v • :w: !.. '\:, Q,. •Pe! /jp/tt<4. 4wi9 'Pa9 8- //- 32E z-,�9.98 . . .c/ae-07•/eV • ?• �I�r ; ..�. ;.`I, �: • I o m s. L.n/. N• G z 9 w% u)- -- '`1w•4 • . ',i..,•F.• . - •Ooo 2 - 5 Sub 32 't ii 2J U1 :,: "l •1.%88 - //- 32 W• 445.2 N• • / I (,.,. th c� . • • • • .,. • :r� ; , \.. • • i • • •r' % ' IV ;:I n 1+%� r '�' • d'1 Nee - 02-S_8:Al re;V, • •.W N '�.1� 7S oo J. • '�,,:1F , Li• a a\ I , • i.•y '/a'd GS k�, . • . • 1 c1 N 1 :t W � a rif' • • • l;ig .ill., .,.`)• .�'i' .vj: y •g0 . • • 04 . •...• . pc :,. . . . • . v,. .... • !�,{,�, a�' 11,11 k:'x::5.86-OZi SS •_ 214.44 _ V. r�It`• ,e.... ,1•V ':?.u7 I42.'1Z•1•'g 1, T /V 89 4•3 - 2l@• . I n , r /r jrt•i.l ': •i c'��, p:+f.,1... ''i.., r.. ki' J 1' t• .) • f S •,.:�.::.• .,•rr C.: ., • Mfif:v .:Y:'1•,: t'i•i:,.,' I may: .I•.. • e+,I47 g•.•0k 16 ,:;ti•: ::;', .I,; .',:.�.��h . • . c 'n, ORDINANCE NO. 4199 pc• • <h A, I;;•;; h ;:` : .••:, n, 3 % CITY OF RENTON !l'';:i.: 'itte,g i'v::• • 31 ;r'. ,' /�, DIPARTMRNT OF PUBLIC WORKS k'IA,' 4 ;.i.. .l: w. '. •.r1.4.lii'.z 1 .4�' i1 8' d2- 58'K/ ' . t`Y,:k v .1• :j0•24.._...1, ,..,K' :.;..wsag si , , . , Exhibit for X•.f � 'i r�' 14, •,, ,:Iei' ;,4.0. :k,;.vJr;1•.1;•..:,a ;/ ¢... R-018-88 • ,ti y • • �� D[IIOH[D DA7I �'',`4 `ui t!!^ SiN'.a.1.74NTe.:N j',04"k;M� B mu!NO 1 9iIL. i. r ✓+ . , 4fi..; ;11 ':•.nR O' ,2'3O DRAWN .1'Y. t,1,;,(�,y 1 . +4:'• I. !'�k :. .. :'.�/�' ' /CALF ...�y tr.;to 'r.. I Nr . .• ,�• :O:: ' "' i, y. .5: 'W.; • CHICKS° ►IRo flee. .��a_ 1 k .4�+.�: �.ep��'a•• (aka,�lit'1,tF�Y.Tn' ,I •' •Y. }' {i'• n: 'L, l �, •In1.N 41 t :'M t:i.a .r4 t. . 'i.Y ,11:;V '.1'.'d, :'q'., ht..'' 'I, y''.'. .,J APPROVrDr' . 1 SQ?V. i61,115 i,t1: ;:31 „, r' �'',.ri;;:1 '1. r,, '�fu;'•,4r'1• ' SHt[r o►-- 7�Y./ '�tt,1:''•'I �,... u uJ�k'Y1t f.i4:i•,5 (1 1�• ,,I�,. r IR[[iMl Of MAUL 11 OI,IU / r December 19. 1988 Renton City Council Minute Page 363 ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways and Means Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke presented a report Committee recommending the following ordinances for second and final reading: Ordinance #4195 An ordinance was read annexing property located in the vicinity of 132nd Annexation: Hudson Avenue SE/Union Avenue NE and NE 25th Place to the City of Renton; Hudson; A-002-88. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance #4196 An ordinance was read establishing the zoning classification for the Hudson Rezone: Hudson annexation property to R-1, single family residential; property located in the Annexation vicinity of 132nd Avenue SE/Union Avenue NE and NE 25th Place; A-002- 88. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke presented the following ordinance for first reading: Rezone: Bennett An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of property located Community Builders, on the south side of NE 5th Street at the 4200 block and east of Union Inc., R-018-88 Avenue NE from G-1, general zone, to R-3, medium density multifamily zone for Bennett Community Builders, Inc., R-018-88. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR THREE WEEKS. CARRIED. Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke presented a report recommending first reading of the following ordinance and advancement for second and final reading: Budget: 1988 Year-End An ordinance was read providing for 1988 year-end budget adjustments in Adjustments the total amount of $9,200,578.00. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL SUSPEND THE RULES AND ADVANCE THIS ORDINANCE TO SECOND AND FINAL READING. CARRIED. Ordinance #4197 Following second and final reading of the aforementioned ordinance, it was Budget: 1988 Year-End MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL ADOPT Adjustments THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke presented a report recommending approval of the following, resolution: Resolution #2747 A resolution was read setting a public hearing on January 23, 1989, to Vacation: VAC-88-001, consider vacation of a portion of Sunset Boulevard and Duvall Avenue NE Sunset Boulevard and for Atlantic Richfield Company, VAC-004-88. MOVED BY STREDICKE, Duvall Avenue NE SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS (ARCO) READ. CARRIED. Finance: 1989 Risk Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke presented a report Management Plan recommending that the 1989 Risk Management Plan be referred to the Community Services Committee to review the increase in the medical deductible. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Appointment: Public Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke presented a report Works Director recommending approval of the Mayor's appointment of Lynn Guttmann as public works director commencing January 9, 1989. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Vc: u;liers Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke presented a report recommending approval of Vouchers 57265 through 57511 in the total amount of $807,908.69, having received departmental certification that merchandise/services have been received or rendered; Vouchers 57267-57269 machine voided. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL APPROVE THE VOUCHERS AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT DECEMBER 19, 1988 ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following.ordinances for second and final reading: Ordinance Annexing Certain Territory of the City of Renton (Hudson Annexation/A002-88) Hudson Rezone to R-1 located in the vicinity of 132nd Ave SE/Union Ave NE and NE 25th Place The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following ordinance for first reading: Rezone for Bennett Community Builders, Inc. R-018-88 (Heritage Forest Apartments) The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following ordinance for first reading and further requests suspension of the rules advancing it to second and final reading: 1988 Year-End Budget Adjustment The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following resolution for reading and adoption: Resolution setting public hearing of January 23, 1989, Duvall Avenue NE (ARCO) - VAC-004-88 1989 RISK MANAGEMENT PLAN (Referred 12/19/88) The Ways and Means Committee recommends the 1989 Risk Management Plan be referred to the Community Services Committee to review the increase in the medical deductable. • , Ways and Means Committee Committee Report Page Two December 19, 1988 REAPPOINTMENT OF HEARING EXAMINER (Referred 12/19/88) The Ways and Means Committee recommends approval of the Mayor's reappointment of Fred Kaufman for a two-year period commencing February 1, 1989 through January 31, 1991. APPOINTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR (Referred 12/19/88) The Ways and Means Committee recommends approval of the Mayor's appointment of Lynn Guttmann as Public Works Director commencing January 9, 1989. Ric and Stredicke, Chairman J. Robert ugh og ‘"111C4A-Luz d Nancy Mathews t N November 7,_1988 Renton City Council Mini Page 314 Mayor Clymer thanked Finance staff for their presentation and invited the public to attend budget hearings which will be held Monday through Thursday, November 14-17, 1988, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers. AUDIENCE COMMENT Thelma Budd, 140 N. 36th Street, Renton, requested advancement to Utilities Advancement Requested Committee report under Old Business. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL SUSPEND THE REGULAR ORDER OF BUSINESS AND ADVANCE TO OLD BUSINESS. CARRIED. Utilities Committee Utilities Committee Vice-Chair Mathews presented a report recommending Latecomer Agreement: concurrence in the recommendation of the Public Works Department to Budd, N. 36th Street concur in the James H. Budd request for temporary latecomer agreement for installation of the 8-inch water line at N. 36th Street from Park Avenue to Meadow Avenue. The Committee also recommended that the City participate in the cost of this installation by providing an engineering design for the watermain replacement. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. Upon inquiry by Trimm, Mathews indicated the Committee's intent that this latecomer agreement will be the first approved under the revised latecomer procedure requiring notification of adjacent property owners. CARRIED. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the Consent Agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. At Council request, Item 9.H, request by Mayor for policy concerning moving expenses for newly hired department heads was removed and held for discussion by the full Council. CAG: 88-076, Lind Finance/City Clerk reported bid opening 10/21/88 for Lind Avenue SW, SW Avenue SW, SW 10th to 10th to SW 12th Street and NE 24th; 4 bids; engineer's estimate: $454,922.21. SW 12th Street Refer to Transportation Committee. Claim: Hutchinson, CL- Claim for damages, CL-52-88, in an unknown amount filed by Lola 052-88 Hutchinson, 632 Shattuck Avenue South, Renton, for damage to landscaping from broken water line, allegedly resulting from negligence by city crews (1987 to present). Refer to City Attorney and insurance service. Finance: 1989 Cost of Finance Department recommended 3.3% cost of living increase be granted to Living Increase non-represented employees for 1989, to match percentage granted all labor unions. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Finance: Budget Finance Department requested budget adjustment in the amount of $7,500 to Adjustment for City fund increased prosecutions by City Attorney's office stemming from Attorney increased enforcement and anti-abortion actions. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Appeal: Good Shepherd Appeal filed on Hearing Examiner's recommendation to approve rezone from Group Home Rezone R-1 to G-1, modified short plat, and conditional use permit for Good (Olympia Avenue NE), Shepherd of Washington group home; property located in the 1000 block of R-015-88 Olympia Avenue NE, south of NE 10th Place. Refer to Planning and Development Committee. Plat: Final, Craftsmen Hearing Examiner recommended approval of final plat for Craftsmen Homes/Pacific Properties Homes/Pacific Properties (May Creek Highlands); 10 acres located on the (May Creek Highlands), west side of Duvall NE between NE 17th Street and NE 21st Street FP-078-88 (extended); File No. FP-078-88. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Rezone_Bennett Hearing Examiner recommended approval of rezone of 1.22 acres from G-1 Community Builders, Inc. to R-3 for Bennett Community Builders, Inc. (Heritage Forest Apartments); (Heritage Forest_ property located in the 4200 block of NE 5th Street; File No. R-018-88. Apartments), R'-018-88 r Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Policy: Moving Expenses Mayor requested discussion of policy concerning payment of moving expenses for Newly-Hired for new department heads. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Department Heads Personnel: Director Mayor appointed Ruben Nieto as personnel director and requests Council • Confirmation confirmation of appointment by November 14, 1988. Refer to Ways and • Means Committee. Annexation: Hudson Planning Division requested public hearing be set on 11/21/88, to consider zoning on the Hudson annexation property, 16.74 acres located north of the existing Renton corporate limits in the vicinity of 132nd Avenue SE/Union Avenue NE and NE 25th Place. Council concur. Utility: Aquifer Public Works/Utilities Division transmitted request from PACCAR for Protection Map adjustment to Aquifer Protection Map and legal description per Resolution. (PACCAR Adjustment) No. 2735. Refer to Utilities Committee. For.Use By City Clerk's Office Only A. I . # � . AGENDA ITEM RENTON CITY COUNCIL MEETING • SUBMITTING Dept./Div./Bd./Comm. Hearing Examiner For Agenda Of November 7, 1988 Staff Contact Fred J . Kaufman (Meeting Date) (Name) Agenda Status: BENNETT COMMUNITY Builders, Inc. SUBJECT: (Heritage Forest Apartments) 4200 Block ' Consent of NE 5th Street. Public Hearing Rezone of 1 .72 acres from G-1 to R-3 and Site Approval to develop a 28 unit apartment complex. Correspondence p Ordinance/Resolution X ,Q /`— ©ld —0 i Old Business Exhibits: (Legal Descr. , Maps, Etc.)Attach New Business Study Session A. Yellow File Other B. C. Approval : Legal Dept. Yes No N/A _ COUNCIL ACTION RECOMMENDED: Finance Dept. Yes No. N/A REFER TO WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE Other Clearance FISCAL IMPACT: Expenditure Required $ Amount $ Appropriation- $ Budgeted Transfer Required SUMMARY (Background information, prior action and effect of implementation) (Attach additional pages if necessary.) Applicant wishes to rezone 1 .22 acres from G-1 to R-3 and seeks approval of a site plan to build 28 apartment units, , Hearing Examiner recommends the City Council approve the rezone as requested. The Hearing Examiner approved the Site Approval request subject to four (4) conditions' (see report of 10/10/88) . PARTIES OF RECORD/INTERESTED CITIZENS TO BE CONTACTED: Yellow File • \ SUBMIT THIS COPY TO CITY CLERK BY NOON ON THURSDAY WITH DOCUMENTATION. / • 46 CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER Earl Clymer, Mayor Fred J. Kaufman October 31, 1988 Todd R. Bennett, President Bennett Community Builders 5729 Lake View Drive Kirkland, Washington 98033 RE: Bennett Community Builders, Inc. File No. R-018-88 and SA-018-88 Dear Mr. Bennett: The Examiner's Report and Recommendation regarding the referenced request has not been appealed within the time period established by ordinance. Therefore, this matter is being submitted to the City Clerk this date for transmittal to the City Council for review. You will receive notification of final approval, as well as a copy of the enacting ordinance, from the City Clerk upon adoption by the City Council. You will be notified of all action taken by the City Council upon approval of the request. Please feel free to contact this office if further assistance or information is required. Sincerely, FRED J. KA FMAN HEARING EXAMINER FJK:dk� �` cc: VCity Clerk Building Division Planning Division 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2593 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )ss. County of King ) ANNETTE D. KLEINMANN being first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and states: That on the 10th day of October 1988 affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. Bennett Community Builders, Inc. File No. R-018;88; SA-018-88 SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this pa day of ( , 1988 • No a Public in and for the State of Washington, residing atri? -2cit-)IJ , therein. Application, Petition, or Case #: R-018-88; SA-018-88 (The minutes contain a list of the parties of record.) -t • October 10, 1988 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION APPLICANT: BENNETT COMMUNITY BUILDERS, INC. File No: R-018-88 and SA-018-88 LOCATION: 4200 Block of N.E. 5th Street SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Rezone of 1.22 acres from G-1 to R-3 and Site Approval for development of a 28 unit apartment complex to be called Heritage Forest Apartments. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Planning Division Recommendation: Approval with conditions. PLANNING DIVISION REPORT: The Planning Division Report was received by the Examiner on September 20, 1988 PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Division Report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES The hearing was opened on September 27, 1988 at 9:00 A.M. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit #1 - Yellow File containing application, proof of posting and publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit #2 - Assessors Map Exhibit #3 - Site Plan Exhibit #4 - Landcape Plan Exhibit #5 - Site elevation west and south Exhibit #6 - Site elevations east and north Exhibit #7 - Map showing recreational areas Exhibit #8 - By reference - City Council Minutes of September 12, 1988 The hearing opened with a presentation of the staff report by staff Senior Planner, Jeanette Samek- McKague. The applicant wishes to rezone approximately 1.22 acres from G-1 (a holding zone) to R-3 (multiple family designation) to construct a 28 unit apartment complex. The following persons testified regarding the project: Tod Bennett Victor Karpiak Bennett Community Builders P. O. Box 72 5729 Lakeview Drive Renton, WA 98057 Kirkland, WA 98033 • 1. Bennett Community Builders, Heritage Forest Apartments R-018-88 and SA-018-88 October 10, 1988 Page 2 John Hunt Nicky Nisco VP Savor Service Corp. 4200 N.E. 5th Street P.O Box 360 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98057 Jim Goerg P. O. Box 531 Renton, WA 98057 The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak, and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at approximately 10:15 A.M. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicant, Bennett Community Builders, Inc., filed a request for approval of a reclassification for approximately 1.22 acres of property from R-1 (Single Family; Lot size - 7,200 sq ft) to R-3 (Medium Density Multiple Family) together with a request for approval of a site plan for a twenty-eight (28) unit apartment complex. 2. The yellow file containing the staff report, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as.Exhibit #1. 3. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the City's responsible official issued a Declaration of Non-Significance (DNS) for the subject proposal. 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. 5. The subject site is located on the south side of the 4200 block of N.E. 5th Street, east of Union Avenue N.E. 6. The subject site was annexed into the City with the adoption of Ordinance 2290 enacted by the City Council in November, 1966. 7. The site was automatically zoned G-1, its current classification upon annexation. 8. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of commercial uses, but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the plan. 9. The site has a modestly undulating topography. The highest elevation is located near the northeast corner of the site where the elevation is approximately 408 feet. The lowest elevation is approximately 391 feet near the south-central portion of the site. 10. An existing single family home and accessory buildings are located on the site. These structures would be removed prior to development of the proposed apartment building. 11. The area contains a mix of smaller apartment and condominium units and larger apartment complexes. North of the site are multiple-family units. Immediately east of the subject site is the Windsor Place complex which contains approximately 200 units. Windsor Place is under construction at this time. Additional multiple-family units are also located west of the site. 12. South of the site is the commercial zone focused on N.E. 4th Street. A Safeway store and other commercial uses are located south and southwest of the subject site. Immediately south is undeveloped commercial property. 13. The zoning in the area is mixed. A tier of R-3 zoning, the zoning requested in the instant case, is found north of N.E. 5th Street. R-3 zoning is also found both east and west of the subject site along the south side of N.E. 5th Street. This R-3 zone continues eastward and southward reaching N.E. 4th Street, encompassing the Windsor Place property. 14. The corridor along N.E. 4th Street is generally zoned B-1 (Business/Commercial) especially near the intersection of Union and N.E. 4th. There is an O-P (Office Park) district along the south side of 4th southeast of the site across from the southerly extent of the Windsor Place complex. Bennett Community Builders, Ins. Heritage Forest Apartments R-018-88 and SA-018-88 October 10, 1988 Page 3 15. The applicant proposes developing a twenty-eight unit multiple family complex on the subject site. The complex would consist of five buildings arranged in a "U" configuration around centrally located parking. The open end of the "U" would be directed at N.E. 5th Street. 16. The applicant would provide a combination of open parking stalls and carports in the central portion of the site. 17. The applicant also proposes providing both an active recreation area along the east margin of the site between two of the buildings and a passive recreation area near the west margin of the site. Each of these areas are approximately 20 feet wide by approximately 60 feet deep. 18. The site will be regraded to accommodate the proposed buildings. The building pads will have varying elevations to provide some topographical relief. The range will be modest, with the highest building located at an elevation of approximately 405 feet and the lowest located at approximately 395 feet. 19. The applicant proposes sideyards of approximately 10 feet to 15 feet and a rear yard of approximately 25 feet. The rear yard will also step down approximately 5 feet toward the south. 20. The proposal is just east of a complex which bears down closely on the rear, delivery area of the Safeway store which provides one of the least desirable residential commercial transitions possible. The applicant has attempted to avoid a similar result by modifying the topography and providing a landscaped 25 foot setback and fence between the dwelling units and the commercial property to the south. 21. Each of the buildings will be two-stories high. Four of the buildings will contain six units each, while the fifth building will contain 4 units. 22. The 28 units requires 49 parking stalls which will be divided between open stalls and car ports. Staff has recommended that if carports are provided that they be located only in the immediate center of the complex to preserve the feeling of openness and that no carports be allowed adjacent to the residential buildings. 23. A 28 unit complex is expected to generate approximately 170 vehicle trips per day, approximately 11 school age students and approximately 47 residents. Traffic engineering has analyzed the road system and has determined that the roads serving the subject area have the capacity to handle the anticipated traffic. 24. Neighbors have expressed concern regarding the extension of N.E. 5th Street easterly into the Windsor complex east of the subject site. The traffic from that complex is anticipated to be approximately 1,200 vehicle trips per day. Those trips would be divided between N.E. 5th Street and N.E. 4th Street. The neighbors have addressed these concerns in a separate petition to the City Council which will consider the matter at a future meeting. 25. While the subject site has been viewed as additional open space, it is privately owned and cannot be maintained as a recreational facility for residents of the area without City Council intervention. The applicant will provide on-site recreational areas for residents of the proposed complex alleviating to some extent the demand from residents of the subject proposal for additional park space. 26. The proposal contains a series of internal walkways, although for some reason, they are not continued across the front of Building C. Staff has recommended that the sidewalks be placed in front of Building C. CONCLUSIONS Rezone 1. The proponent of a rezone must demonstrate that the request is in the public interest, that it will not impair the public health, safety and welfare and, in addition, that it complies with at least one of the criteria found in Section 4-3010 which provides in part that: a. The subject site has not been considered in a previous area-wide rezone or land use analysis; or b. The subject site is potentially designated for the new classification per the Comprehensive Plan; or • Bennett Community Builders, Ins. • Heritage Forest Apartments R-018-88 and SA-018-88 October 10, 1988 Page 4 c. There has been a material and substantial change in the area in which the subject site is located since the last rezoning of the property or area. The requested classification is justified. 2. While the Comprehensive Plan appears to designate the subject site for either commercial or office park uses, the existing uses in the immediate area should be viewed as a constraint on establishing either commercial or office uses on the subject site. 3. N.E. 5th Street is not a commercial street. It does not invite retail shoppers to explore its corridor. Since the street is developed almost entirely with residential uses commercial exploration should also not be encouraged. N.E. 5th's character is clearly residential and that that identity should not be altered. The original intent of the Comprehensive Plan probably was to provide sufficient depth to permit commercial and especially parklike office development along the north side of N.E. 4th Street. This option would appear to have been foreclosed by the residential development which either has occurred or is occurring immediately east and south of the subject site. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan is clearly inapplicable to the subject site. 4. The R-3 zoning requested is compatible with the surrounding zoning and surrounding uses. Both the zoning and uses are R-3, therefore, the request is reasonable. Approval of the request will extend the R-3 district and avoid single family enclaves or islands. The density permitted, approximately 25 units per acre is similarly compatible with the existing zoning and uses. 5. Development of the site with the maximum 30 units permitted by the R-3 zoning would potentially increase the traffic by approximately 180 trips, the resident population by approximately 51 persons and increase the student population by approximately 12 students. 6. Traffic analysis demonstrates that the street system serving the subject site has capacity for the increased load. Similarly, the school system and general infrastructure can handle the anticipated increases in general population and school age population. 7. The request is timely. The area has undergone considerable change in the last three to five years. There are more apartment buildings in the area and the new Safeway and retail stores are intended to serve an increasing population along the N.E. 4th corridor. Site Plan 8. The site plan ordinance provides a number of specific criteria generally represented in part by the following enumeration: a. Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan; b. Conformance with the Building and Zoning Codes; c. Mitigation of impacts on surrounding properties and uses; d. Mitigation of the impacts of the proposal on the subject site itself; e. Conservation of property values; f. Provision for safe and efficient vehicle and pedestrian circulation; g. Provision of adequate light and air; h. Adequacy of public services to accommodate the proposed use; The proposed use satisfies these and other particulars of the ordinance. 10. In addition, proposed site plans must not adversely affect area-wide property values, must provide adequate air and light, and must not cause neighborhood deterioration or blight. The proposed plan appears to successfully satisfy these additional criteria. 11. The proposed multiple family complex appears to serve the public use and interest. The 28 unit complex will provide additional housing choices in a developing urban environment and in an area with appropriate and adequate utility services. • Bennett Community Builders, Ins. ' Heritage Forest Apartments R-018-88 and SA-018-88 October 10, 1988 Page 5 12. Again, the proposed use is compatible with those goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan which specify that districts be identified and that residential amenities be protected from the encroachment of incompatible uses. The proposed complex is compatible with the surrounding multiple family uses. It is certainly more compatible than some form of commercial endeavor which would have retail traffic and deliveries. 13. The proposed use meets the zoning and building code provisions. The complex will maintain at least the minimum setbacks from side property lines and will exceed most of the requirements. Landscaping will also be installed along all property lines to buffer the use from adjoining uses and to buffer adjoining uses from the subject use. 14. The complex will be two stories in height and will be little different than surrounding complexes. There should be little impact from the development, although there will be a commensurate increase in traffic with the new development. Since the roadway serving the site is adequate to handle the increased traffic, the impacts should be small. This office cannot speak to the impact of the other proposals which will be served by N.E. 5th Street, they have been approved after similar analysis of their respective impacts. Any street closure is a matter entirely for review by the City Council. 15. The proposed landscaping, topographical relief and fencing should minimize the impacts of the proposal on the site. The site will not be completely leveled preserving some interest and variety. The buildings will step moderately up and down the site and will be spaced to both preserve a feeling of openness and to offer some privacy between units in different buildings. Staff's recommendation that no carports be constructed adjacent to the dwelling units will also preserve the feeling of openness and prevent overcrowding of the site. 16. The development of additional units which do not vary substantially from existing developments along the street should have no impact on property values. 17. The proposal contains a series of internal walkways thereby providing a safe system separating pedestrians from vehicles. This system should be continued in front of Building C. 18. This office is particularly concerned about the separation between the rear, southerly exposure of the complex and the rear of the commercial district immediately south of the subject site. The applicant appears to have provided more than adequate separation which is enhanced by landscaping materials and a moderate elevation change. The landscaping and the choice and size of materials shall be subject to review and approval of the City's landscape architect. Such review is intended to assure that landscape materials provide the visual separation necessary to screen the site from the commercial district and to assure that the landscaping provides immediate effectiveness by the use of larger more mature specimens. 19. In conclusion, while development of the site will increase the traffic, population and urban feelings of the area, these were not unanticipated by the City in adopting a Comprehensive Plan which designated the site and surrounding areas for larger scale commercial and residential uses. The proposed use appears to fit in with this developing area and can be accommodated by the underlying infrastructure of roads and utilities. RECOMMENDATION The City Council should approve the reclassification of the subject site from G-1 to R-3. DECISION The site plan for a twenty-eight unit multifamily complex is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant comply with the conditions imposed by the ERC. 2. The landscaping and the choice and size of materials shall be subject to review and approval of the City's landscape architect. Such review shall assure that landscape materials provide the visual separation necessary to screen the site from the commercial district and assure that the landscaping provides immediate effectiveness by the use of larger more mature specimens. 3. This walkway system shall be continued in front of Building C to connect Building C with its adjacent buildings. 4. Traffic related fees to mitigate traffic impacts shall be $404.80. Bennett Community Builders, In Heritage Forest Apartments R-018-88 and SA-018-88 October 10, 1988 Page 6 ORDERED THIS 10th day of October, 1988. FRED J. KA MAN HEARING E AMINER TRANSMITTED THIS 10th day of October, 1988 to the parties of record: Tod Bennett Victor Karpiak Bennett Community Builders P. O. Box 72 5729 Lakeview Drive Renton, WA 98057 Kirkland, WA 98033 John Hunt Nicky Nisco VP Savor Service Corp. 4200 N.E. 5th Street P.O Box 360 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98057 Jim Goerg P. O. Box 531 Renton, WA 98057 TRANSMITTED THIS 10th day of October, 1988 to the following: Mayor Earl Clymer Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator Richard Houghton, Public Works Director Members, Renton Planning Commission Larry M. Springer, Planning Manager Glen Gordon, Fire Marshal Ronald Nelson, Building Director Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney John Adamson, Developmental Program Coordinator Gary Norris, Traffic Engineer Renton Record-Chronicle Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 P.M., October 24th, 1988. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within.fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of $75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. • . : ,. ...;.. i....: .:', ' ,:iit 72LI•tr. Li -----,:-.7,1, ,I,o, . . ii"( —. 'Z. . - . 4 Pa -.-7- 0 ,.. ..... , -..1_, a I.. ”..: !.!:\.)1... 6., ,0 1 w .. . ..... ... . . . L. - -N--- : INI.,,,..."Tic__= •).-7- (I .' . ` '‘st02)\( • - R- 1 ^^ ' � w !1. r f e-t�"� • . nr • . !4 I —111� al . � . a ,L, . I z L i "", lio, i.,:i,•:, , . r,."--qt ..f,.! . .7;;Ter 4..,t; ..!--°.. ..1. - ; r.. ii ' • . i.. _L1 • __r ... — pip _ - 1 • _ ' T . N Gill .� :• • ( G-11 ; t _ -. . 1 l � i I w y Milli)vib7 * eil-;♦���� P 1 1 i , s . is L ,1 1 .1 —..J • x O— . . . . :,,:, . ;\ ; 42 . 1 • .... ..66 \ 1 1 ? r•rT 1 . . —,---• — - 1 ,lt n TIMM BENNETT COMMUNITY BUILDERS , INC . HERITAGE FOREST APARTMENTS R-018-88 , SA-018-88 , ECF-018-88 • APPLICANT BENNETT COMMINITY BUILDERS TOTAL AREA APPROX. 1 . 22 ACRES . PRINCIPAL ACCESS N.E . 5th STREET & UNION AVENUE N.E. EXISTING ZONING G-1 , GENERAL USE EXISTING USE NONE PROPOSED USE 28 UNIT APARTMENT COMPEX COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN MULTI—FAMILY • COMMENTS. LOCATED IN THE 4200 BLOCK OF N.E . 5•th STREET, ON THE SOUTH SIDE .OF N.E. 5th STREET AND EAST OF UNION AVENUE N.E. )f � ~ ' - 1 I ; • Ifbf Me I.E. . a m --- 1 u TFY A444•10.34- . ��ter` a a rra —r,��i — aw ft►A•REST 111 ����1� � -- /a rc �_tE_ Sf31t NA' 1_.' a a uz �`- icw - 5 � . ill .......".F.c ry rs — ••• ;,'1"1!..11%;'____4.-...141.—Lt_ 311111111W 4111,0alteiri. I ,.2 1 .•.._Mil: Cn ,. 4 k 01 tilw 0,1, \ L Fey °I ' wctPt- L :•1 oFF-397.Q t ;V \ i \tFF-4\ 5. \ zu0 yeTMMz___ I „, t LJti� \` \ VIGIII QI Q»� rin i \NINNN.__ _�• - aim&imisiginginu I "--.....,___L••••imill .`.__,- 11!` , \1 e mat" . J \\ ils. \AL. 14-...h.1 1,X•C.Q4.0c.."N.C1 e . . g . 4a5 If!j' 01 0.4 I\ \ r1 ; i • r •• 9 ' �� 1t M'•\\ ,�� �` \\ \ \ 401 I �.,aw.,s..feaoq G•�I : v N •FF1 95.0 FF-397.0 • t \ \ \ f ri �_ -- I�� 1 FF.. 97.2� \ �F OA0 \\ I \ 1trenntit. t+r a [I era I 1 \ imi \ \\\ B-1 1.4.1 0 ;WOW( 1.12,thal I �1.� Ii ' . ' ) r AMC M N. J.'�L= - `.� PROJECT NO • 7`� / `qi1/ • y pf3AwN eY • 2 Yt • ZONING MAT - arw • • • - ISSUE DATE . I I JUNE 200920 pROJEIT DATA BUILDING DATA LATEST REV . 1) 121101nq a(6,ants) ]unita/floor - ]N!•r ......••........... . I I 11 II1selA=on1M r'-3 6•`.. 184 Sr - ]I r,va,o..a,•n+nq : A-1 ]) •u1111nq! 14 un1L1 • ]I ilrs at.. 3.]3 Yir• -]units/floor - 3f04•r , �� ,f/ �/ f) U•vltr allw•a ]) •u1nq a f.unit/) ' SAFE WAY I .3!u•lu,•a- _ io Unit. :I unit./=loei _ 1.10 i!) :34; nrpn••6 - 3•Unit. .6.OVi..CiTY GF F•.EPlTOi'1 _ " 11`s°��1t - .r spat.. .) > 1nqo docks(6.nl:)_ 3.3! /`e� ]) D•rr1p0 Rwlr•6 !) •u1101n1•(6 units)- 3f9f SF r. C..(�L,t { E.1,'. [.a,WrO.poor,1 f•-0.i30.-o. 6 2. 1!a fl 1, • ` _-n • •) Zvt•1 14,•/iw_►xr. 10.33{Sr I Ot) a) f10a•.lis . NEERING AND • iot.l 1ae6•ra ,„u-' •i5 fr 6) ypr•lt r•:fi�. -1l3f9_fL CIV ,, fetal impervious an. -]lilt/I •`. 109 Teal 11fa Y� - !].la]f1(loot) ill �. j ''"' PACIFIC [E• NGINEERING COMPANY pLA'NNtNGiCONSULTANTS • • t� `}�SSE:f �t�Aii�Us• '" • • • ' - .�. . , .. r . .. , . . I • , .•... a . .• ,•••.. .. . . . CITY OF PITON r c Tzi, ii vE flip a. UNION AVENUE NE. • 6= A...A 0...,:21 ' -.. ., ••. IR . JUN 2 2 1988 . BUILDING/EONTIC.) DEPT. -----.. 1 1 1 I 1 / .... i ••,, :1: t., :: .).• . 0 t•.c 1 . • . 1 . i... . i- (A I •'• '' c,) •,-, I C 1:3-.1 i......'. . . ,:, ., 1 ? • ,..-if.,..,1 y-.1, a 1:•.i r: 1 r_;•:.-_. D ni I I - ..•'. 41 4;11:1 L---H'hu . ..,..... .. . . . t 'D • ...Y. t.:•1 . I .1: • . .... / . • I . • . .•1 . ....,AI ---.,-- -,s .:-..• /. .' •ir 17:. .:-..7 ". :. ‘,. , i .''It'. 174 . i .114•t:.. I R.•• 41- ell.OG. NO.4 ,,t'i. BLDG ND i `.--. —"II; I / t, ... t,I at I .: . 6,'.4 1•1!...;:.:1 .. .I ' i • ;n 0 .. . In' 4 I 1 . • , ,,i,:„:„ ;.,,• ,• . .4 • _...—.: __—___. ts.1 '2....: •, .:. ..2 1 1 • — 1- 11_,P ... _ _ - • .' i , • .1 1 ' ASP.IALY ...•••,,,. Ith•:: • \ ilil 1 \\&,.i 1 __, ___ __ _.__ _.___IV.OW/6'311.:/V — • • i/-r----------- --- \ 10 Nli ' . . ) • cl• \ .'—J 0 * ii 1 1 "1.,, • ii Z1 i'..3 / 1 4 , .,-----,. .." .. f• ti ':.4.•••-: X t , ', __} .1:1 i..:.;..::: .....li (/ '1, •F•IIIN:1.1 b . ---.------- /„..---- . 1 ..1.1. 1 it11%rtri .• I . :•. *]T:4141:4(li'' .:. . . . . ZZI.------------- ,,,, t;";'W'' ' • . '. '‘ . .:LY ______. (--, •_.......... ..,, ..„.. k. Z.. i•--) :.'.• ,::::;,4 ••••,, . •• ail "'• iii • ii' ...' • • ..,. ,3 • ..0 / / / / / • 14 4...k;' r!..,.. / / ?.41tN,.:-..... I eit--..1.;ilhic• ... I '41 — • i • . ' 1. • :' •" ..i......... 0.-*• 1 --------\---.... • •iii:t..1.riv.... ' :, 1,11 ./ ?V .f. .• • ii,,.., • , •:,.. .... At f 4: •7 I / / //42°1217 /'' • • 7 / (../IVi.:EFT7-,?Pi. ee • I 7. 1•• ••• • , .1 • • oa ma.. LES DoNNER —4,-.0 c:DLAV,WOO40 meriwetiler MM..*Ina...QUM ieachman associates, inc. „,,„, WASHINGTON ... _._ ____...--.... ---- .._ .. .. .._ . . .. . . . . . .... . .. . . • t, 1 . CITY‘,._ cr-,_ t,... • • . 1 1 0 q ' et f.F.f 1TOI F ---A RECE,IV r,z.D ..... , . 1 H - , - ...„ i. . i Ell . Juti• 221(..120 1 . 1 t v! li •••!. 4 . I 11 . 1 BUII D!1':;SIZON!rn7.1 Dr.F.PT. . .. .• . :i• :41: I 1...-.• :'! ill .I . - - - . ' ' 0-......„_ _j_.,..--j . nI-77— • / 11 i Li 0 illt_. i__.- • IT" V . Ili; 4 . . G i 1!I .. ... ,1 b .. . 1 t*:(__.. ® w.; I' '1- .:..... A . ... I I ' .: 4F 1." ir ' ' ilt ' .i.-.. El' — tl ---. 19 11 r 1 F &I , 'a [ IIII.: l,. •' h,...... 1 %. '',:t . •.,, I litli .11. . • I , I., r _ ,. --..,-. - • • 1 g.. IA it ti I 4.-_ c —, 1 r-Th I- liu .4 On' „ __.--- 1110 I , , ! , III . km ...... • $i ' . i R II i 4. . -_,1.. _ ! ..,,..,.. 0 _ •11.1 4 -I' A ' , . _ . 16 -----ii.. - _ 1 - ,p • 11 31- -••• t it I 1-k II v. ! p _ y < Cr :! 1 e ›, _, ;, • , : , , . _ ,. . r ill I I # s ' f----- • , . . 1 i5 .I ...- 1 o_d‘ ,E I 21 . . • ,7d. . ,p , i t • 11 1 I I, 1 . . 3 " :• I . • E. 1 i ..-r 1 — 1 II ..,, II 0 .• 3 II __. . • 1 11 I t- . T I V . .12.r' il H 1, ., i . if , i 1- ,, . If• ' r; -----t-i*,- , \,-.. il —''7 • . . .'it , 1 Ti Li, P • il .0 .1.• " : . 7--,- .; . • F-11 )1.6 . . II 14 =_--- ty, Ili II ___ H tj . . • • • . 1 . r . 0 1-1-4-11.1-` • 11 1711 V't WI .' ti i .• I' .I Tr . ,I il 1 1 .= 1 ,:•rr • C)'- ,... _ ( ' i a A• i.. • i --i ...:.:1 ,- - 6,1[.77r—H. 1 1 71... ri, . . i_ t—I-0 --1 t • . 11,-4,1/V . 1 Tr. • I' • .--------)1' il 7.. El , A. I , • , . • i . ..: . . .., , • ,r : _ . , ,,,.--- N I 2 . .:I.-7'71r-7 . .•. .i I-I E-12-\IT/A\ E— ror, D-r_./'' r`f . . 4 NU•Ca.-111-1.0-•JJJJJ:,:,1 ‘••••31.jj 1 1 ' ' i -. 1-1tIt 11 . CAHILL AIM V..s..., ••V : V1OS NC 1!ST ..:,..L .: ••...i. Itl.lICVUZ,•: ••••:.: , A slooi:.. g . 1,1 414-16 lie'b •,-, tr,77.=_-_-_roaxvira'vv./mitt-Aro-1;7.necai_ (zo ) . fj 11 NA. ' •'zos.:Sooi'0,'?riaine's ora-ii-evl • . ... .... . , • . • : / PLANT SCHEDULE Cl T Y CT R.z :7 rs "' t- rr-r-e-Fr‘f • l • ran o.. . r." �}UI`� ` C 1c Jg \ _ �� -r.....,r..� Pear r. too_nw. ::s 4, � r...n.....r I. ,� � * V PE 1�,.a. /-1...rer.a,or. e.e or.nrn ■ I \,�•—•`�.e rIt r� _ i er..mro Iw.r.n.r r a ran.. ���••',•� Dr•� l a • _ v.Y Q • 01-3 I v eae ,��...� :d.- / �� ew,n.w ��`i n....Parac n.., o- ,y.`l'r.� t�.._.w n.�r:.r..•I..v �_ 5 w —+Z1 ...a L r.. In zl•-i••^ LOS O ear:,1r....)n:. .. v>.n CO.ert.aD tr[e Z. �.E 0 2.•-z••n YJ11\v 0.'iM.. t N oat. narown. • 2 t3 0 ro.n^ �• eae ran.., c- 6 w ie....— a..o.rar•c..aw. ,.67•.....---' ._� •...�- N.E.Sltt STREET Ina rn a• 1. ,...cal �,�. ^ _ 5 wI. r.l. . .L'1 ii it v v:a..mr... =�•-a•. i .i L`J �'1•I �� 9Ll...-,YC�X� Ii X' I� v..:rr.wn al• •- eta! .� 1 1�, .� (111 w. ran^.>- ■w �-1, —_rar _• r If I c:.w..ra.:. w.c.n. =i I i) } FFE a05 ... P.•.��z••. .>` FFE 397 vu:c--! • P4 "-�r.r....n e.. ...ran. �w v.nv..rw IIITitiTiT :L• },.y FFE 403• ' v.r:.,n.:. .... rl.n.•:.r...can. r FFE 395 E ; ,i. •f _ I w "' ... .ra.n..:.r o.clnr car <el.—t= E e. g ran 'r a l- II I Gan 5.1_.. i Z �J I o..r.n.w.nw r. j Wit. �I •, • / ,e Q o_ u aa..r) -u vf'll `�v+,,, 9 -,ril �A.GC•. fr7{aoo•It� < Q .- els 3 MP rxnfoJy P 2a C - �� i . I co _ a C • y ;D 111 6 it 4� . FFE 395' ,� FFE 398 t i. FFE 397 I FFE 397.2 FFE 40.0 _ E . diet (d uoG,r, N s- G AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING • On the o0` day of S7EPT-6-m [.fe , 1988, I deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing 19,0E C pszpo'1-) documents. This information was sent to: NAME: REPRESENTING: �1Db gENoE rr BEu 7r 6127mn A))T,/ NGt 1 L. s, /IJc. 51029 ‘-4KcolatiJj LA Ki RK�A-�J� ' f 3 3 Isu e Do,v) . Pqg SE 7Pn b ST K LN -'1 LDw) Ail *ID 441D4 PE vNo-s r4o 10)-1K 741td sr avTa�1 q o a • • SIGNED BY: ,,„/96f.„/ SUBS IBED - AND SWORN to before me this n J day of �( , 1988. k \49 -\ Ce..2,110(1) Nota Public _.n and for, the State of Washington, residing at (- 12LGb Yu , therein. Project Name and Number: &AWE-7T C/V! M• JL vR S - BEI\1N ROUP _ _ „- INCORPORATED' August 22,. 1988 ` s; - 1Lr Donald K. Erickson, .'AICP- iZonin Administrator '' ' Environmental 'Review, Committee Policy Development :Department City of ,Renton 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, . WA • RE,: Bennett Community 'Builders, ;Inc: Heritage Forest Apartments,- ECF-018=88` ', R-018-88 • • Dear' Don: _ The purpose of this letter 'is to respond to ,our- letter _ of August'. 8, '.1988' r (copy enclosed' as Exhibit A) We 'are pleased..to -receive a,`"Determination of: .Non-Significance" for' : the project,. ' • We feel the project has been thoughtfully 'designed to provide'''a good in-fill,'compability ,with "the ' surrounding properties. . We have Consciously,= designed the project to provide a` relatively' smooth -transition between • the .two story :residential developments to••the west. 'and'• ' - north, and ,the; three story -structures:'under, construction on the eastern neighboring 'property: , We, have, also-:taken':great ' care to orient the living areas to the -east,' west, and south, to provide',the. greatest-possible• "livability"' of units from the ,standpoint of sun orientation', (we have : ' : omitted any north orientations., to eliminate.'dark/n 'sun ? light oriented'`,units). .on We appreciate:the comments of your August .8th':letter. - In" response- to your .comments, we 'submit' the 'following: ' ' explanation, information: ' 1) , . That the applicant °develop :a design .plan for open ; . _ • space,'%landscaping and screening which:maximizes -' open space/natural environment for both habitat enhancement, . and'.passive/active recreational ` :.opportunities for residents (adults and children) .. 572T Lake View Drive:• Kirkland,'WA"98033 • (206) .827-7436 a) , We have provided two open space recreational areas. on .the site: 1) East boundary - we have provided an • active open space recreation 'area sports,, court facility that will provide for basketball,, paddleball,- and other active . , recreational uses. We generally expect this amenity will be used by children, however, adults could use it on occasion. . 2) West. boundary' - we have provided a passive open space recreation area with < ; lawn and :park bench, areas: We • anticipate this area to be relatively quiet and to 'accommodate picnics and reading. : We have enclosed a revised . site plan/recreation open space plan as , Exhibit B to this letter. b) In response to your comments, we have made a site plan change to allow for a 25 foot - buffer on the south border of `the site (previously 15 feet)- ,and have elected to • install 6foot high solid fence screening along the border. The -25 foot buffer will • allow: for gracious landscaped back yards - that orients south. The screening will ' provide both security and a visual buffer ' from potential future commercial development located to the south. A south orientation is a, preferred orientation for livability of unit plans: The extra landscape buffer and screening will improve the overall feel and outlook of. the . southern facing building (see buffer area and fence detail on the enclosed Exhibit. B) ' c). We "have made exterior elevaton ,changes to the building along NE 5th to orient the buildings , to NE 5th (new elevatons enclosed as Exhibit C) The front doors to the units in these buildings face NE 5th similar to the , buildings of the project on ,the north side of NE 5th:- We have also added sidewalk , R �, extensions to NE" 5th as well as post lights " ' T ` F i� to ,facilitate. access of pedestrians to NE � � . , [1 Zi .s,� i "' } - 5th, both' in daylight and at night. - 1Q) • �_. z)....„,c. act 1000 - We did spend '.considerable time ,and effort reviewing, potential site plans that, . - • incorporated parking•,on the rear (southern) ' - side of the site:. ' In' reviewing 'these alternatives,: it appeared that each alternate : we prepared. with"this concept in. mind ,it had. - ,' the following shortcomings. The impervious surface of the site increases because' of longer road = ext.entions: required to move the paving„ to .the rear of the site. in certain areas, three story buildings the' active and passive.recreation areas ;would. _be''.combined, thus creating,:a conflict 'of uses. ' .(i y e: _active recreation- , activities would preclude passive and, active' usages at. the ,same` time. The orientation : ,of buildings;would be. such to reduce the number of desirable southern exposure units and increase the " . r " number of: less desireable northern.'. oriented units. Walking distance to., certain units would , • : be significantly "increased. 4 We do not ,feel the potential benefit 'of moving the parking to :the rear, of' the site is :sufficient to offset these shortcomings. We,:,do feel the revised plan. has ..increase the "rear.:.yard`buffer on`.the '• • south side of the site by:25 .'feet and the ;planned solid fence will, effectively accomplish buffering the objective of parking on the rear of the site, without accompanying- shortcomings. 2): That the applicant limit construction operation, to hours between:9 AM and :5 PM on Saturdays and that no construction occur on 'Sunday to mitigate noise ' The applicant agrees with this condition..,'' 3) ' -'That the applicant be required to periodically wet,'' . ; down the construction site with water to limit , CT :Cy IlkNTOPI �;: dust and debris. a . it •. - '. .. - _• ;' - • : The .applicant agrees with this 'condition. , 4').;1 That the applicant be required to wash down truck wheels .prior- to :their, leaving the site to 'minimize tracking of dirt on the public right of way. The applicant agrees with this condition. 5) That the applicant be required to provide a bond in: the amount of 1, 000 to _insure.' street clean-up • ` : during construction operation. ' The applicant agrees with this condition. Furthermore, the applicant will commission -a soils , report to confirm the suitability of the site for the proposed in fill and development.: The applicant will plan ; to submit a ;soils`.report with building permit application ,. -' - documents. . .. . „ " We appreciate the:, comments of the Environmental Review Committee and feel the 'Changes we have made in response: to the comments have improved the project Please feel free to . call if you have 'any questions or ' , if, further information is required,. . - , . � - . " , . :Sincerely, :- • ' ' :, ; . .' , . BEN TT ,GROUP, INC. , , _ �y L71. ., odd R. Bennett . ' President' • 0569 ; +L' P0 o17'�fi'6:{BV �r r I IiM !TT GQOUBp July 22, 1988 -'cLEcy DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF RE TON J U L 2 5 1988 BE City of Renton : I W Building and Zoning Department Municipal Building Renton, WA RE: Heritage Forest Apartments A Planned 28 Unit Apartment_. Community Renton, Washington Enclosed please find the following document: Certificate of Notification of Adjacent Property Owners/Site Plan Please feel free to call if you have any questions or if further information is required. Sincerely, BENNE T GROUP, INC. ad Bennett President TRB:mf 0442 • 5729 Lake View Drive • Kirkland, WA 98033 • (206) 827-7436 ]3ENN!TT GQOU REZONE APPLICATION HERITAGE FOREST APARTMENTS JUSTIFICATION FOR REZONE The subject property is located 400' east of the inter- section of Union Avenue N.E. and N.E. 5th Street. Just to the south is N.E. 4th Street which is a major east-west roadway with commercial development along both sides. The specific parcel is in a neighborhood which is predominantly residential in character with multi-family development on three of its four boundaries. The specific parcel is currently zoned G-1 (General Commercial) and the comprehensive plan designates the preferred use as commercial. We believe that the property should be re-zoned down to the level of R-3 (Multi-Family Medium Density) and this action can be justified for the following reasons: 1) In-Fill Zoning - Three of the four properties which border the site are currently zoned R-3 and contain multi-family development. The fourth parcel adjacent to the south is zoned B-1, but its access is from N.E. 4th Street and its neighbors are the commercially developed properties that front along N.E. 4th Street. The subject property is a classic example of the in-fill re-zone of a parcel to complete a homogeneous group of properties with common use and common access. 2) Compatibility of Use - Currently all the properties which front on N.E. 5th Street are zoned R-3 including the recent rezone of the westerly portion of the new Windsor Place apartment project. The exception is the subject parcel. A rezone of the subject property from G-1 to R-3 would complete a nice residential environment on N.E. 5th Street and insure a compatibility of all adjacent neighborhood uses. 3) Conflict of Designated Use - The present comprehensive plan recommends Business Office Park as the preferred use in the existing G-1 zoning. Since all other uses on N.E. 5th Street are residential and the subject parcel has access only from N.E. 5th Street, a conflict of use would be created by a Business-Office Park development under existing zoning. Business vehicle traffic which 5729 Lake View Drive • Kirkland, WA 98033 • (206) 827-7436 could include delivery type trucks and vans, and continuous daily vehicle trips associated with business activity would be disruptive to the quiet residential atmosphere of N.E. 5th Street. In addition, the commercial character of office type buildings would be visually incompatible with the character and charm of neighborhood residential architecture. In summary, we feel there are at least three reasons that would substantiate rezone of the property to R-3 from the present G-1 zoning. In addition, we were unable to formulate any strong positions to support any benefits either visual or economic to develop the property as the existing G-1 zoning recommends. The subject parcel is an "orphaned" commercial property with no connection or access to neighborhood business development and should be re-united with its adjacent "residential family" . 0449 CERTIFICATION OF NOTIFICATION OF ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS/SITE PLAN * * *FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY* * * . PROJECT TITLE: H eri i,i C,e, (f APPLICANT: I�eN.-�e Co,w4 ice, icgersJ l✓L APPLICATION NUMBER: 015-7-36 The following is a list of adjacent property owners and their addresses. A notification of the pending site plan application shall be sent to these individuals as prescribed by Renton City Code. Chapter 7 Section 38'of Title IV (Building Regulations) of Ordinance No. 1628 relating to site plan approval. ASSESSOR'S NAME ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER Lee, Charles E. & Doris D. 4103 NE 5th St. Renton, WA 98056* . 0010-06 Gamba, Maxine'N. 4105 NE 5th St: Renton, WA 98056 0020-04 Savren Service Corporation PO Box' 358 ._.. ..Renttn,.:>WA T98057 0030-02 Parker, Kingsley G. & Margaret 4109 NE 5th St. Renton, WA 98056 0040-00 Fisher, Frank & Winnifred 4113 NE 5th St. Renton, WA 98056 0050-07 Rider, Michael A. & Eileen D. 4115 NE 5th St. Renton, WA 98056 0060-05 Nelson, Antonette E. 4117 NE 5th St. Renton, WA 98057 0070-03 Wall, Gladys J. 4119 NE 5th St.._. Renton, WA 98056 0080-01 Goerg, James A. • P.O. Box 531 Renton, WA: 98057 0090-09 Savren Service Corporation P.O. Box 358 Renton, WA 98057 0010-07 Savren Service-Corporation P.O. Box 358 Renton, WA . 98056 0110-05 - Nelson, Kimberly Ann _4207 NE 5th- Renton, WA 98056 , .. 0120-03 Paxton Properties 13018 SE 189th Court Renton 98058 0130-01 Paxton Properties 13018 SE 189th Court Renton 98058 0140-09. Bieker, Robert G. 7409 114th SE Renton, WA 98056 0150-06 Bieker, Robert G. 7409 114th SE Renton, WA 98056 0160-04 Karpiak, Victor P.0:-Box 72 Renton, WA 98057 0010-08 Karpiak, Victor P.O; Box 72' Renton, WA 98057 0020-06 Moskwa, Marsha & Marvin 16611 SE 147th Renton, WA 98056 0030-04 Bockh, Greg P. 4110 NE 5th St. Unit 4110 Renton,_WA.. 98056 0040-02 Green, Michael W. 4114 NE 5th St. Renton, WA 0050-09 Savren Service Corporation, P.O.. Box 358 Renton, WA 98057 0060-07 Reilly, James P. . .4120 & 4122 NE 5th Renton, WA ' 98056 0070-05 Reilly, James P. 4120 &...4122 NE 5th:.Renton:,L_WA 98056 0080-03 West Hill Development Corporation' 22032 SE 244th Pl. Maple Valley 98038 0090-01 West Hill' Development Corporation 22032 SE' 244th Pl. Maple Valley 98038 0100-09 Nisco, Nikki Nan 4200 NE 5th Renton, WA 98055 0110-07 . Briere, Gerald J. & Gayle A. 1800 Duvall Ave. ,NE Renton, WA 98056 0120-05 First Security Mortgage Inc. PO:.Box 3487 ' Bellevue, WA 98009 0130-03 McClelland, Carol A. 4208 NE 5th Renton, WA., 98056 0140-01 Jolliet Irene M. 4212' NE 5th Renton, WA 98056 0150-08 City 'of Renton 9002-08 Rardessono, Sara A. 1006 Shelton Ave NE Renton, WA 98055' 9.011-07 Gustafson, Arthur D. 909 Union Ave NE Renton, WA 98055 9012-06 Gustafson, Arthur 909 Union 'Ave NE Renton, WA 98055 9013-05 City of Renton- . 9015-03 Brown, Charles L. & Mary L. 12426 2nd Ave S. Seattle, WA 98168 9029-07 .Wontc,,; R.L. 3629 NE 6th St. Renton, WA 98055 9036-08 Wonio, Richard 20320 SE 192nd Renton, WA 98058 9.037-07 - Smith, Edward S. 3504 NE 4th St. Renton, WA 98055 9038-06 Burlington Northern, Inc. M4 - 810 3rd Ave - Tx Dpt 208 Ctrl Seattle, WA 98 9.039-05 Wroten, Robert E. 529 Union Ave NE Renton, WA 98056 9048-04 Pickering, Drury D. 14900 237th Pl SE Issaquah, WA 98027 9050-09 Zike, Daniel A. 4004 NE 4th Renton, WA 98055 9103-06 Swanson, Arthur D. 4512 Talbot Rd S. Renton, WA 98005 . 9106-03 .r • ASSESSOR'S . NAME ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER • • • . . • • • ASSESSOR'S NAME ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER Puget Sound Power & Light.Company. 9164-02 McNeil, George 517 Union Ave NE Renton, WA 98056 9169-07 Huffman, Robert H. & Carolyn L. 12200 SE 18th P1 : Bellevue, WA 98005 9198-02 Jones, Brian V. & Cindy Lou 537 Union Ave NE Renton, TAR 98055 9214-02 R & S --Investment Company 2101 4th Avenue Ste 15 ' ' 9217-09 • Grayson, Irene . 604 Union Ave NE Renton, WA 98056 9011-04 Union Square Associates 10900 NE 8th St. 9028-05 Tiffany Associates Inc. 6333 Lk Wa Blvd NE 408 Kirkland 98033 9029-04 Union Square Associates 11058 Main Ste 110 Bellevue, WA 98004 9085-05 Union Square Associates . 10900 NE 8th St 9089-01 • Windsor Place Associates 102 1200 S. 192nd Seattle, WA 98148 9100-06 Williams, Clarence 550 Union Ave NE Renton, W 98055 9102-04 Windsor.-Place Associates 1200 S 192nd.St #102 Seattle, WA 98148. 9104-02 Williams, Clarence '550 Union Avenue NE Renton, TnTA 98055 9105-01 Safeway Stores, Inc. PO Box 947 Bellevue, WA 98009 9128-04 ' Legato, Inc. 1911 Maple Valley Hwy.Renton,.WA 98055 9.132708 .Maletta, Donald M. . 1509 N 24th St Renton, WA' 98056 9148-00 Grayson, Helen G. 604-Union Ave NE Renton, WA 98056 9150-05 Water District 90 . 9263-09 Windsor Place Associates . 102 1200 S 192nd Seattle, WA 98148 9307-07 . ' Fairfield Developments Inc. 10900 NE 8th St #900 Bellevue 98004 .9322-08 Windsor Place Associates -102 1200 S 192nd Seattle, TATA 98148 9323-07 'Union Square Associates ' 10900 NE 8th St Bellevue 9333-05 Union Square Associates 10900'NE 8th -St Bellevue 9334-04 Union Square Associates • '10900 NE 8th St Ste' 900 Bellevue 98004 9373-06 CERTIFICATION ' I..jcm , hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property owners and their. addresses were taken from the records of the King County Assessor as prescribed by law. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me. a Notary-Public; in nd forte State of Washington residing "et /� on the _ � Amy'if . • 4.�iti a J62-,14 CERTIFICATION OF MAILING I. . . hereby certify'that .notices of the public meeting on the subject site plan approval were mailed on ' . to each .listed adjacent property owner as prescribed by law. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me. a Notary Public. in and for the State of. Washington residing at on the day of SIGNED: FORM 200 i : ., CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) - ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO. : ECF-018-88 APPLICATION NO(S) : R-018-88, SA-018-88 PROPONENT: Bennett Community Builders DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application to rezone approximately 1.22 acres of property from G-1, General Use, to R-3 , Medium Density - Multi-Family Residential; and application for site plan approval to allow the development of a 28 unit apartment complex on said property to be called "Heritage Forest Apartments" . LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 4200 Block of N.E. 5th Street, on the ' south side of N.E. 5th Street and east of Union Avenue N.E. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Building and Zoning Department The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probably significant adverse impact on the environmental. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43 . 21C. 030 (2) (c) . Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-2822 (D) Renton Municipal Code (see attached sheet) . These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340 (2) . Because mitigation measures were applied, the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fifteen (15) days from August 8, 1988 . Any interested party may submit written comments which must be submitted by 5: 00 p.m. , August 23 , 1988 , in order to be considered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period will commence following the finalization of the DNS. Responsible Official; Environmental Review Committee c/o Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator Planning Division Community Development Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 PUBLICATION DATE: August 8, 1988 DATE OF DECISION: August 3 , 1988 SIGNATURES: (:7:21„ Ea4n..--A; Rdna d G. Nelson Larry Springer Building Official Planning Manager `le Richard C. oughton arc' �,4: �, . TON Public Wo s Director .: .; ) l� ‘ 1,71 SE 91 r Exhibit A ) NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON., WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE . HELD- .BY ,THE RENTHEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL 'CHAMBERSON. THE. SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON ,SEPTEMBER, 27, 1988, : AT 9: 00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: BENNETT COMMUNITY BUILDERS., INC.- HERITAGE FOREST APARTMENTS Application to rezone approximately 1. 22 acres of property from G-1, General Use, to R-3, Medium Density - Multi-Family Residential; and application for site plan approval to allow the development of a 28 unit apartment complex on said property to be called "Heritage Forest Apartments. " Located in the 4200 block of N.E. 5th Street, on the south side of N.E. 5th Street and east of Union Avenue N.E. ECF-018-88, R-018-88, SA-018-88. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Community Development Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC, HEARING ON SEP 'EMBE t 27, 1988, AT 9: 00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. Published: September 16, 1988 • OF Re, • f o O . NI CITIIIICE • Oc,. 9�1-.E0 SEP1 •". • City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner , will hold a HEARING . ,; PUBLIC in CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL ON SEPTEMBER 27 , 1988 , BEGINNING AT 9 : 00 A.M. P.M. ECF-018-88, R-018-88, SA-018-88 CONCERNING: BENNETT COMMUNITY BUILDERS, INC. - HERITAGE FOREST APARTMENTS Application to rezone approximately 1. 22 acres of property from G-1, General Use, to R-3 , Medium Density - Multi-Family ' Residential; ' and application for site plan approval to allow the development of a 28 unit apartment complex on said property to be called "Heritage Forest Apartment" . I El.t,,.11lll,Il. „ U Y ! t •11 \ ..1\ Ide \rW 1 I C iilw� y I 1 I,.�.1. l�/ 11 ..l 1 . .. „III.I.\ .'. l�,lla 'I,l .\i� - v.-,Y;�pG 'C\•i�._I _q /N��6U •._I f� yII I I} ; ! 1 _ ZI I L, ,I� 1, If• _.1 1- _ • A 11N•E . . .. b•r 1 PL ' _. _ OI iL �' l P i� _ -- —•--•— a.. I _L\ .f_�. Jle\_`u ol�._L J.L.I„Illl,u\I j ..• �, •. l� n le•. I— Li • R_1 ilTrirTTfT R , - ' - . - I 3-1 1.�. IL.- . u, 111 .,.. ._ . ._ — ,•_• R-2 I _ r , - is • rT I I I I Q 4 1 . - • I •R.U_3. l�� J :T. W su J I ; .{. .. �� -- • ST S JL ,r _i • I iLI 1 ' D"'I I 7, - .:: ,c, I IO8-1 I —7—.._. . i - I • G E N EFI Y LL 'C IATTIf O B OC K OF N®.E.RT STDD R E S S: REET, ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF N.E. 5TH STREET AND EAST OF UNION AVENUE N.E. • • FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATMON , RENTON CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting ,ptenriber i2, ;98Z; Municipal Building Monday, 7:30 p.m. Council Chambers MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Mayor Earl Clymer led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag and called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order. ROLL CALL OF KATHY KEOLKER-WHEELER, Council President; RICHARD M. COUNCIL MEMBERS STREDICKE, THOMAS W. TRIMM, JOHN W. REED, NANCY L. MATHEWS, TONI NELSON. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL EXCUSE ABSENT COUNCIL MEMBER ROBERT J. HUGHES. CARRIED. CITY STAFF IN EARL CLYMER, Mayor; MICHAEL W. PARNESS, Administrative Assistant; ATTENDANCE LAWRENCE J. WARREN, City Attorney; MAXINE E. MOTOR, City Clerk; LARRY M. SPRINGER, Planning Manager; CARRIE TRIMNELL, Assistant Planner; LT. H. RAY CALDWELL, Police Department PRESS Kathy Hall, Valley Daily News APPROVAL OF MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL MINUTES COUNCIL APPROVE THE COUNCIL MINUTES OF AUGUST 22, 1988, AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. PUBLIC MEETING This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published, Annexation: Fetterly Mayor Clymer opened the public meeting to consider the 10% notice of intent petition for the Fetterly annexation. The annexation consists of eight parcels containing approximately 5.51 acres located south of the existing Renton corporate limits in the vicinity of SE 116th Street and 142nd Avenue SE. Signatures on the annexation petition constitute 85% of the total assessed valuation of the property to be annexed; and the proponent wishes to annex in order to connect to City sewers and subdivide the land. Referring to a vicinity map, Assistant Planner Carrie Trimnell described the departmental recommendation for imposition of R-1, single family residential, zoning upon annexation of the site in conformance with the City's Comprehensive Plan designation and existing uses in the area. She also advised that the annexation scope has been expanded as a result of interest expressed at the initial public hearing on 6/20/88 by owners of three additional parcels. Ms. Trimnell indicated that the proposal represents a logical extension of City services and boundaries; however, additional staff may be required to support this and any future annexations. Therefore, the Planning Division recommended that Council accept the 10% petition and authorize circulation of the 75% petition; require simultaneous imposition of City zoning on the property; and require the property owners to assume their proportional share of the City's bonded indebtedness. The Division further recommended that Council schedule a public hearing on 10/17/88 to consider acceptance of the 75% petition and imposition of R-1 zoning. Noting prior traffic enforcement problems along 142nd Avenue adjacent to Hazen High School, Councilman Stredicke questioned whether the annexation includes the entire width of that roadway. Staff responded that half of the roadway is proposed to be included in the annexation and the other half is to remain in King County; however, the annexation boundaries can be expanded to include the entire roadway and the matter can be reviewed and considered at the 75% annexation hearing. Councilman Stredicke supported inclusion of the entire width of the roadway to improve traffic enforcement; and he requested a written recommendation from staff regarding boundaries of the annexation prior to the next public hearing. MOVED BY REED, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING DIVISION TO ACCEPT THE 10% PETITION AS SUBMITTED AND AUTHORIZE CIRCULATION OF THE 75% PETITION; REQUIRE SIMULTANEOUS IMPOSITION OF CITY ZONING ON THE PROPERTY; AND REQUIRE PROPERTY OWNERS TO ASSUME THEIR PROPORTIONAL SHARE OF THE CITY'S BONDED INDEBTEDNESS. CARRIED. September 12. 1988 Renton City Council Minutes Page 256 'f' AUDIENCE COMMENT John Scott, 400 S. 43rd Street, Renton, representing Valley Medical Center, Advancement Requested requested advancement to committee reports regarding expansion of Local Improvement District No. 329, S. 43rd Street improvement project. MOVED _:::; SECONDED BY OT T'z2), ._-, COUNCIL, SUSPEND THE REGULAR ORDER OF BUSINESS AND ADVANCE TO TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE REPORT REGARDING LID 329 AND WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE REPORT REGARDING LOMAS REZONE/ONE VALLEY PLACE (adjacent to Valley Medical Center). CARRIED. Transportation Transportation Committee Chairman Nelson presented a report concurring Committee with the determination by Valley Medical Center and Public Works LID: 329, SW 43rd Street Department to expand LID 329 to construct the undercrossing from the north to the south side of S. 43rd Street to serve the Valley Medical Center properties. It was understood that Valley Medical Center representatives have waived the necessity of public hearing and are aware they are responsible for all additional costs connected with this undercrossing. The Committee found the undercrossing to be of public benefit and granted a street use permit at no cost until such time as the undercrossing is abandoned. The Committee recommended referral of this matter to Ways and Means Committee for proper ordinance. MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Ways and Means Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke presented a report Committee recommending first reading of the following ordinance: Rezone: Lomas (One An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of 9.17 acres of . Valley Place), R-088-86 property located between the 4300 and 4500 block of Davis Avenue South from P-1 (public) to O-P (office-park); Lomas Rezone/One Valley Place; File No. R-088-86. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. AUDIENCE COMMENT Roger Blaylock, 10717 NE 4th Street, Suite #9, Bellevue, distributed copies (continued) of a letter from his client, Bay Ridge Development, Inc., 4211 200th St. SW Citizen Comment: Bay #205, Lynnwood, requesting review of the Southeast Comprehensive Plan by Ridge Development, Inc. the Planning Commission as a work schedule priority during 1988-1989 to - Southeast consider major changes in the area of Valley Medical Center. Referring to a Comprehensive Plan vicinity map, Mr. Blaylock indicated his opinion that areas designated as appropriate for low density multifamily uses on the plan should be expanded to provide an adequate buffer between the high density medical center and lower density uses to the south. He reported that Bay Ridge has recently obtained 31 acres lying south and east of Valley Medical Center with the intent of developing multifamily residential uses to support medical facilities in the area. However, since the Southeast Comprehensive Plan has not been evaluated since 1980 and massive health care development has occurred in the area, review of the plan is needed to address major issues of traffic, public services, and land use focus. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER COUNCIL REFER THIS MATTER TO THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR RECOMMENDATION BACK TO COUNCIL AS TO WHEN REVIEW OF THE SOUTHEAST COMPREHENSIVE PLAN COULD BE SCHEDULED ON THE LIST OF PLANNING COMMISSION PRIORITIES. Councilman Stredicke referred to State law which requires periodic comprehensive plan review by municipalities and urged that the matter not be postponed. MOTION CARRIED. Rezone: Good Shepherd Ralph Evans, 3306 NE I 1 th Place, Renton, referenced a condition contained Group Home (NE 19th in the Hearing Examiner's recommendation on Good Shepherd rezone, File Street), R-010-88 No. R-010-88, for development of a group home on Shelton Avenue NE. Citing a 1982 court case in which zoning reversions without public hearing were found to be null and void, Mr. Evans questioned Condition #3 requiring execution of restrictive covenants to assure that zoning on the site would revert from R-1 to its prior G-1 classification if development of the specified use does not occur within one year. City Attorney Warren preferred that restrictive covenants specify that zoning on the site shall be reconsidered by the City Council if development does not occur within the specified time period. September 12. 1988 Renton City Council Minutes Page 257 Citizen Comment: Nisco - Nikki Nisco, 4200 NE 5th Street, Renton, submitted petitions containing 39 Closure of NE 5th Street signatures of residents urging closure of NE 5th Street one block east of Union Avenue NE to prohibit traffic generated from 380 new apartments units from traveling through the existing neiphborhnn4. Ms. Nisco advised that purchase of her home was based upon prcmiF J the developer that a small park was to be built across the street and the : :ess road would remain a cul-de-sac. In addition to the 380-unit Windsor Apartment complex, another multifamily development is proposed to the south: She requested that to protect the safety of neighborhood children, NE nth Street be barred to all through traffic except emergency vehicles in a similar manner as Grant Street on Renton Hill was blocked when the Woodcliffe Apartments were constructed. MOVED BY REED, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL REFER THIS MATTER TO THE TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE AND ADMINISTRATION TO REPORT BACK. CARRIED. Councilman Stredicke asked that the report from the administration contain information regarding the proposed multifamily development referenced by Ms. Nisco. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the Consent Agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. Latecomer Agreement: City Clerk transmitted request for latecomer agreement from Gary A. Young, Polygon Corporation, the Polygon Corporation, to share in cost of installation of 12-inch water Sunpointe III main along Sunset Boulevard SW for Sunpointe III development, #W-969. Refer to Utilities Committee. Housing & Human Community Development Department/Housing and Human Resources Resources: 1989 Block Division submitted 1989 Housing and Human Resources Block Grant Program Grant Program for review and public hearing. Refer to Community Services Committee and set public hearing for 10/3/88. Claim: Thompson, Claim for damages in an undetermined amount filed by Norman Thompson, CL-42-88 13026 SE 102nd, Renton, for paint damage to vehicle caused by exploding spray can unsecured by City crews working at NE 12th Street and Sunset Boulevard NE (8/23/88). Refer to City Attorney and insurance service. Claim: Rogers, CL-43-88 Claim for damages in an undetermined amount filed by Richard and Lynette Rogers, 13515 SE 173rd Place, Renton, for vehicle damage allegedly caused when City truck backed into it at stop sign at Maplewood Golf Course (8/3/88). Refer to City Attorney and insurance service. Claim: Bainton, CL-44-88 Claim for damages in the amount of $298.62 filed by Irene Bainton, 2300 NE 9th, Renton, for flood damage to basement allegedly caused by sewage backup from blocked sewer lines (6/18/88). Refer to City Attorney and insurance service. Court Case: Gentry Court case filed on behalf of Beverly Gentry for alleged false arrest while picketing at Mark 'n Pak grocery store (8/3/88). (Claim for Damages #CL- 22-86.) Refer to City Attorney. Court Case: Vacca Court case filed on behalf of Nicholas A. Vacca for alleged wrongful demotion by Renton Fire Department from lieutenant to firefighter prior to approval of disability leave (9/9/82). Refer to City Attorney. Finance: Utility Finance Department requested utility collections agreement between City of Collections Agreement Renton and U.S. Bank. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Finance: Housing Finance Department requested approval of Housing Authority bond issue Authority Senior Citizen ordinance authorizing placement of $5.5 million bond issue for low income Housing Bond Issue senior housing units on November ballot. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. (See later action.) Rezone: Thompson, Hearing Examiner recommended approval of rezone request for Jodi R-045-88 Thompson from R-2 to R-3 at 1222 and 1224 Kirkland Avenue NE to upgrade existing units and add two units on site. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Plat: Preliminary, Hearing Examiner recommended approval of preliminary plat for Douglas Prellwitz, PP-013-87 Prellwitz (Swanson Homes) for 12 single family lots at the 2300 block of NE 13th Place. Council concur. King County: Waste Planning Division requested authorization to execute contract with King Reduction/Recycling County for waste reduction/recycling matching grant program agreement. Funding Contract Refer to Ways and Means Committee. (See later action.) September 12. 1988 Renton City Council Minu Page 258 Streets: Transportation Public Works Department/Traffic Engineering Division submitted status Benefit Districts for NE report on NE 44th Street and Grady Way Transportation Benefit District 44th Street and Grady studies. Refer to Transportation Committee. Way lvty rr.D BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY MATHEWS COUNCIL ADOPT THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE Letter from Larry Hazard, 4414 SE 4th Street, Renton, was read expressing Citizen Comment: Hazard displeasure with "right turn only" traffic revision at N. 4th and Garden - Traffic Revisions in southbound on Garden due to inconvenience to motorists. North Renton Citizen Committee: North Letter from Versie Vaupel, P.O. Box 755, Renton, was read reporting that Renton Citizens Advisory three North Renton Citizens Advisory Committee traffic mitigation issues Committee remain: 1) truck routing issues: creating a truck route through the area as part of a City-wide truck route program; establishing NO TRUCK signs at key points such as N. 1st and Bronson and N. 2nd and Factory; removing truck route sign at Rainier; and barring heavy commercial trucks from using the Wells Street Bridge; 2) Metro traffic in residential area--this matter has been referred to Transportation Committee; and 3) extension of existing left- lane striping at North 3rd from Factory to 3rd Place--approved by Council. OLD BUSINESS Council President Keolker-Wheeler presented a report regarding status of Committee of the Whole mitigation requirements related to construction of Park and Garden Plaza Rezone: E & H projects required of E & H Properties. The Committee of the Whole Properties, R-016-87 recommended the following: 1. Adjustment to bond: The original legislation establishing mitigation for these projects should be amended to show a requirement for a $1.1 million bond or acceptable security instead of $1.2 million. This adjustment is necessary due to an arithmetical error at the time of adoption of the ordinance. This item was referred to Ways and Means Committee. 2. Lake Washington/Park/Garden Avenue reconstruction and signal modifications: The Council acknowledged that the required improvements to the intersection cannot be accomplished prior to occupancy of the building. E & H Properties should complete the construction of the eastbound lane on North Park Drive and install a sign for "right turn only" at Garden Avenue until a signal pole sign is installed. Channelization to divert northbound traffic from Garden to North Park Drive shall be done prior to occupancy. Completion of the signalization and full intersection improvements shall be accomplished as soon as possible and no later than January 1, 1989. 3. Realignment of Garden Avenue North from North 6th to North 8th: The Council concurs with the assessment of the administration that this mitigation measure cannot be completed prior to occupancy. The Council recommends that the following measures be taken as interim steps in lieu of the development. a. Construct traffic signals at the east and west legs of Garden Avenue. These signals shall be constructed to city standard design; however, E & H shall be permitted to install a temporary installation at the west leg for a period not to exceed 90 days beginning October 1 to allow acquisition of necessary equipment. E & H Properties shall bear the full cost for design and installation of interim systems. b. E & H Properties must submit a bond or other security acceptable to the Finance Director and the City Attorney in an amount sufficient to guarantee that the project can be constructed at a later date; the responsibility for design, acquisition and construction shall rest entirely with E & H Properties. 4. The installation of the traffic circles/diverters required as a result of the North Renton neighborhood preservation study should be installed as soon as possible. The administration shall have responsibility to determine, based on the circumstances, whether failure to install the circles should impact issuance of occupancy permits for the subject buildings. 5. Reducing the $1.1 million bond submitted by E & H to allow credit for mitigation measures having an area-wide impact: The Committee of the Whole recommended that this topic be referred to the Transportation Committee for an analysis and recommendations prior to September 26. September 12. 1988 Renton City Council Minutes Page 259 The matter should also be referred to the City Attorney for research of the record, input and a legal analysis. (See report below.) MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL to eJ v' :, iJ11V1Y Yk J.' Ya� o!HOLE REPORT. CARRIED. Fire: Firefighters Councilman Stredicke commended Fire Department union personnel for Commended for Waiving volunteering to waive requirements of their contract which calls for time and Overtime one-half pay for overtime and agreeing to be compensated on straight time basis for overtime worked during the remainder of the year. Administrative Assistant Parness indicated that this is an unusual example of cooperation and exemplifies the type of support the Firefighters union has given the City. Public Safety Committee Public Safety Committee Chairman Trimm presented a report recommending Police: Obstructing Council concur in the request of the Police Department to adopt a city Officer ordinance related to obstructing a police officer. The Committee further requested that this matter be referred to the Ways and Means Committee for preparation of the proper legislation. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Community Services Community Services Committee Chairman Reed presented a report Committee recommending that the Cooperative Planning Area Agreement between Annexation: Soos Creek Renton and King County for the Soos Creek Community Planning Area be Planning Area Agreement referred to the full Council for public hearing. MOVED BY REED, with King County SECONDED BY TRIMM, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Housing Authority: Senior Community Services Committee Chairman Reed presented a recommendation Citizen Housing Bond ` regarding the proposed bond issue for senior housing: Issue 1. The City Council should support the request from the Housing Authority to place the issue on the general election ballot (November 8, 1988). 2. The proposal should include a commitment to provide 72 or more units of additional housing to Renton's elderly residents at a cost of $5.5 million. 3. Rather than proposing a specific site for the development prior to the election, the City and Housing Authority should jointly identify a site after a thorough public process and will review alternatives after bonds are approved. 4. The City administration and Housing Authority should negotiate a cooperative agreement that will identify the respective role and responsibilities of the two entities with respect to this project. 5. The cooperative agreement and the ordinance placing the issue before the voters should be referred to the Ways and Means Committee for review and presentation for Council action. MOVED BY REED, SECONDED BY TRIMM, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. (See later ordinance.) Transportation (Aviation) Transportation Committee Chairman Nelson presented a report concurring in Committee the staff recommendation to accept the Renton Airport Master Plan, Phase II, Airport: Master Plan, with advisory committee changes and set public hearing for October 3, 1988. Phase II MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY TRIMM, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Transportation Transportation Committee Chairman Nelson presented a report recommending Committee that no changes be made in the parking restrictions within the downtown area Citizen Comment: Woods (referred 11/2/87). MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, - Parking Ticket COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Rezone: E & H Transportation Committee Chairman Nelson presented a report regarding the Properties, R-016-87 extent to which E & H Developments was to be given credit for regional traffic improvements against its $1.1 million bond and the extent to which the neighborhood mitigation program had to be installed before occupancy of the buildings. The City Attorney prepared a letter to the Council addressing these two questions. He concluded that credit for six improvements should be given against the $1.1 million bond to the extent they are identified as regional traffic improvements from the study being prepared and then adopted by the City Council. The study evaluates alternative twenty-year development land use scenarios for the impact on the transportation system. The six possible traffic improvements for which credit could be given are as follows: September 12. 1988 Renton City Council Minut`, - Page 260 1) Design a turn movement southbound on Park Avenue N. at N. 3rd to minimize conflicts in the left turning movement onto N. 3rd, including any change in the signal; 7) Fund the North Renton Arterial Study to evaluate alternative 20-year • ::„velopment '::=:::d use scenarios for the impact on.the transportation • • s,:;tem; 3) Reconstruct the intersection of Lake Washington Boulevard/Park/Garden ' to provide an,additional eastbound lane on Park Drive from N. 10th to Garden Avenue'N.; 4) Realign Garden Avenue N. at N. 8th to remove the existing dog leg; 5) Signalize the intersection of N. 6th and Garden Avenue N.; 6) Signalize the east and west legs of the Garden Avenue N. and N. 8th Street intersection. With respect to the extent to which the neighborhood mitigation program was to be installed before occupancy of the buildings, the conclusion was that occupancy is not contingent upon installation of the neighborhood mitigation program. However, the developer will have installed all of the neighborhood mitigation program that he has been authorized to install by the date of occupancy. There still may be an open question about traffic diverters, but that issue is outside the control of the developer. Once the developer has been directed to install an element of the neighborhood mitigation program, the Council conditions require the installation as rapidly as possible. It was recommended that the Council permit credit against the $1.1 million bond for regional traffic improvements recommended from the study detailed above when adopted by the City Council, but limited to the six transportation improvements listed in this report. It is further recommended that the occupancy permits for the buildings not be contingent upon installation of the neighborhood mitigation program, but that the developer install those • improvements as rapidly as possible after being directed to proceed. MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY TRIMM, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT.* Upon Council inquiry, City Attorney Warren explained that the conditions are extracts from those imposed by the Environmental Review Committee on the project. Upon Council approval and determination that an improvement is of regional transportation benefit, credit will be given against the $1.1 million bond provided by the developer dependent upon the percentage of regional benefit. Councilwoman Mathews clarified that the developer had agreed to complete 46 traffic improvements in addition to posting a $1.1 million bond. The six aforementioned traffic improvements, either part or whole, are eligible for credit if determined to be regional in nature by the Council. *MOTION CARRIED. Councilman Reed requested his "no" vote be recorded. RECESS MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL RECESS FOR TEN MINUTES. CARRIED. Time: 8:55 p.m. Council reconvened into regular session at 9:10 p.m.; roll was called; all members were present, except Hughes, previously excused. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways and Means Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke presented a report Committee recommending the following ordinance for second and final reading: Ordinance #4171 An ordinance was read establishing a special assessment district for water Special Assessment service in the Renton Shopping Center area in Maple Avenue SW, south of District: Maple Avenue Sunset Boulevard, and establishing the amount of the charge upon connection SW, #W-891 to the facilities. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance #4172 An ordinance was read amending portions of Sections 4-1902, 4-1912, 4- Sign Code: Billboards 1914, and 4-1918 of Title IV (Building Regulations) of City Code by prohibiting certain signs and devices commonly known as billboards, and amending the regulations relating to certain other signs. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. Councilman Reed asked whether two billboard permits which were pending earlier are still valid. It was determined that both permits have lapsed since no action was taken. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke presented the following ordinance for first reading and advancement to second and final reading: September 12. 1988 Renton City Council Minutes Page 261 Housing Authority: Senior An ordinance was read providing for the submission to the voters of the City Citizen Housing Bond of Renton at a special election to be held therein on November 8, 1988, in Issue conjunction with the State general election to be held on the same date, of a proposition authorizing the City to incur indebtedness by issuing its general obligation bonds in a par amount not to exceed`$S,S00,000, payable by annual property tax levies to be made in excess of regular property tax levies, for the purpose of paying all or a part of the cost of providing housing for low- income elderly persons in the City by providing the Housing Authority of the City of Renton with part of the capital funds for the development of that housing under the Housing Cooperation Law and to levy those excess property taxes; and authorizing an agreement with the Housing Authority of the City of Renton for that purpose. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL SUSPEND THE RULES AND ADVANCE THIS ORDINANCE TO SECOND AND FINAL READING. CARRIED. Ordinance #4173 Following second and final reading of the aforementioned ordinance, it was Housing Authority: Senior MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL ADOPT THE Citizen Housing Bond ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Issue Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke presented the following resolution for reading and adoption: Resolution #2739 A resolution was read authorizing the City of Renton to enter into an King County: Waste agreement with King County for a waste reduction/recycling matching grant. Reduction/Recycling MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL ADOPT Funding Contract THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution #2740 A resolution was read authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into an Utility: East Side Water interlocal cooperative agreement for the East King County Regional Water Utility Coordinating Association. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, Committee COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution #2741 A resolution was read authorizing the Finance Director to establish a petty Finance: Municipal Court cash fund for payment of fees to Renton Municipal Court witnesses and Witness Fee Account jurors. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Vouchers Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke presented a report recommending approval of Vouchers 54828 through 55241 in the amount of $2,684,207.51, having received departmental certification that merchandise/services have been received or rendered; Vouchers 54846-54848 machine voided. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY KEOLKER- WHEELER, COUNCIL APPROVE THE VOUCHERS AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS Council President Keolker-Wheeler requested authorization for the Council King County: Trails and President and Mayor to co-sign a letter to the editor of the Valley Daily Open Space Bond Issue News urging citizens to vote "yes" for the King County trails and open space bond issue. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL AUTHORIZE THE COUNCIL PRESIDENT AND MAYOR TO CO-SIGN LETTER. CARRIED. ADMINISTRATIVE Letter was entered from Public Works Director Richard C. Houghton REPORT responding to complaints expressed by Rene and Carol Manning, 2065 SE 8th PUD: Final, Falcon Place, regarding on-site improvements required in Falcon Ridge Final Ridge, FPUD-083-84 Planned Unit Development. The letter outlined requirements for installation of sidewalks and advised that any deviation from the approved PUD would require approval by City staff. Citizen Comment: Letter was entered from Public Works Director Richard C. Houghton to Ellingson - Speeding Mayor Clymer and Council members responding to complaints of speeding Problems at NE 17th and vehicles in the Glencoe area expressed by Gail Ellingson, 4304 NE 17th Anacortes NE Street, Renton. The letter outlined steps the City has taken to assist residents in the development of a neighborhood speed watch program to resolve existing traffic problems in the area. Special Assessment Letter was entered from Public Works Director Richard C. Houghton to District: Maple Avenue Mayor Clymer and Council members responding to Council inquiries of SW, #W-891 8/22/88 regarding special assessment district for water main improvements in Maple Avenue SW. The minimum down payment for connection is 10%, and provisions for advance notification to property owners affected by formation of the district will be included in the new latecomer ordinance to be completed in four to six weeks. September 12, 1988 Renton City Council Minn ;::, Page 262 AUDIENCE COMMENT Versie Vaupel, P.O. Box 755, Renton, referenced Item #7 of the North Citizen Committee: North Renton traffic mitigation program reflected on page 220 of the City Council Renton Citizens Advisory minutes of 7/25/88, in which a petition demonstrating 50% support was Committee required to be circulated among only the residential owners for the traffic circle at 2nd and Meadow since at least 50% of the property owners of the area are commercial owners. She t`ianked members of the Transportation Committee for postponing discussion on the matter of striping on N. 3rd to allow citizens the opportunity for input. Housing Authority: Senior Tony Ladner, manager of Renton Housing Authority, 24703 35th Avenue S., Citizen Housing Bond Kent, expressed appreciation to Mayor, Council and staff for their Issue cooperation and assistance in preparing the bond issue for senior housing for the general ballot. Executive Session MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL CONVENE INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSS PERSONNEL, REAL ESTATE, AND LITIGATION. CARRIED. Time: 9:30 p.m. ADJOURNMENT Council convened into regular session; roll was called; all members were present, except Hughes, previously excused. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL ADJOURN. CARRIED. Time: 10:54 p.m. e MAXINE E. MOTOR, CMC, City Clerk Recorder: Marilyn Petersen 09/12/88 CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETING CALENDAR • Office of the City Clerk COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETINGS SCHEDULED AT CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 12, 1988, COMMITTEE DATE TIME CHAIRMAN LOCATION AGENDA , COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE - KEOLKER COMMUNITY SERVICES Weds. 9/14 4:30 p.m. REED 6th floor conference room Housing & Human Resources Block Grant Funds, 1989 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT Thurs. 9/15 4:30 p.m. MATHEWS 3rd floor conference room Good Shepherd Rezone Appeal' (continued) 5:00 p.m. Renton Family Practice Rezone Appeal PUBLIC SAFETY TRIMM TRANSPORTATION Thurs. 9/15 8:30 p.m. NELSON 1st floor conference room Extension of striping on N. 3rd Street (AVIATION) (North Renton Advisory Committee) UTILITIES HUGHES WAYS & MEANS Mon. 9/19 6:45 p.m. STREDICKE 6th floor conference room • OTHER MEETINGS & EVENTS LEOFF Board Weds. 9/14 8:00 a.m. 6th floor conference room Suburban Cities Weds. 9/21 Noon Kent PSCOG Annual Assembly Thurs. 9/29 Tukwila • ISSUED CITY 7F R-NT'N PAGE 1 08/26/88- ' - ----.. - - BUILDING-8-ZONING-0 PARTITEAT- ---.__-- PERMITS ISSU 0 ° WEEK ENDING AUGUST 2e, 1988 BUILDING PERMITS 14238 75,000 BOB RIVILY 401 RAINIER AV S REPAIR FIRE DAMAGE 14257 65,000 K-MART 44C RAINIER AV S RENOVATE AUTO AREA 148?29 , 242 HENRY QUILL°N,023 TRAMMELL CRCW 14 82�G SW 41ST ST 555 INDEX AV NE INSTALL PARTITION WALL .J RE-ROOF • ','200 • �:r31id l:TE-V,EN LAVENDER - • 11 C8 N 33RD ST INSTALL MDT TUB 14261 . 2,006 'PAUL• PLATTER 2927 NE 5TH PL CONSTRUCT BATHROOM & ADD DOCR 14202 5,540• GREGDORLANO 2125 SE 8TH PL AOC FAMILY ROOM OVER GARAGE 14263 1,675• JOHN. URCH 27C9 JONES AV NE RE-ROOF 14204 15,500 EUGENE COLLINS 211 SHATTUCK AV S REPAIR ROOF 14265 225,000 hALTER CHMIELOWSKI 354 TAYLOR AV NW 7 UNIT APARTMENT BUILDING 14206 4,)'000 ROBERT L. UNDSCERFER 1314 WMITWORTM AV S SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE 14 67 4 ,000 ROBERT L UNDSOERFER 1318 WHITWCRTH AV S SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE 14268 97,035 HENDERSON HOMES 50 3 NE 21ST ST CONSTRUCT S/F RESIDENCE 14 69 59,7Qpu HENDERSON HOMES 2217 ILwACC AV NE CONSTRUCT S/F RESICENCE 14 70 111,2re HENDERSON HOMES 2084 ILWACO AV NE CCNSTRUCT S/F RESIDENCE 77 4,1f660 SHELTER AMERICCAN HOLOIN 60C[ SW 5TH CT CONSTRUCT 141 METAL CARPORTS 4 7 0.840 SHELTER 4MERICAN HOLDIN 57C STEVENS AV SW CONSTRUCT -109 METAL CARPORTS 14273 97.309 HENDERSON HOMES 2065 MCOUTAM CT NE CONSTRUCT S/F RESIDENCE 14275 2.000 CO VAN TRAN 16,32 MORRIS AV S CONSTRUCT ADDITION 4276 191,314 VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER 4uu S 43RD ST TENANT IMPROVEMENT 14277 4,513 HENRY HICKS 483 DUVALL AV NE RE-ROOF ELECTRICAL PERMITS ' 15361 2,000 DIRK GUSS'E 163 UNION AV NE REPAIR FIR° DAMAGE 15303 8,124 5 & B WAREHOUSE 409 RAINIER AV N REPLACE SERVICE PANEL & FIXTURES 15364 5,572 TRAMMELL CROW 820 SW 41ST ST TENANT IMPROVEMENT 15365 9,450 WINDSOR PLACE ASSOCIATE 4415 NE 5TH ST PC WIRE BUILDING 15367 4,723 WINDSOR PLACE ASSCCIATE 4415 NE 5TH ST IF WIRE BUILDING 15368 750 LARRY WAGNER 420 BURNETT Ay N SERVICE CHANGE TO 200 AMP 15369 500 MCDONALDS RESTAURANT 4411 NE SUNSET BL ACC 2 CIRCUITS, MOVE CIRCUITS 15370 3d,OQQ BOEING CO 800 PARK AV N 010-60 TENANT IMPROVEMENT 153711lu000 HENDERSON HOMES 5044 NE 23RC ST INSTALL TEMPORARY POWER 15372 100 HENDERSON HOMES 5046 NE Z1ST ST INSTALL TEMPORARY POwER 15373 100 HENDERSON HOMES 515C NE 20TH ST INSTALL TEMPORARY POwER 15374 25,710 BOEING 800 PARK AV N *10-56 REMODEL 15375 300 BUSY BEE PRESCHOOL - 463 DUVALL AV NE REPLACE 3 CISCONNECTS/REWIRE 15376 200 STEVEN LAVENDER 1108 N 33RD ST ELECTRICAL FOR HOT TUB 15377 300 THRIFTWAY 21 S GRADY wY ELECTRICAL FOR SIGN 15378 225 BEVERLY ALMOSLINO . . 135 CAPRI AV NE REPLACE METER BASE, INSTALL NEW 15379 1,850 NORCON 2335 S_ 8TH PL WIRE NEW RESIDENCE 15380 .15,000 BOEING CO 800 PARK AV N 04-89 TRAFFIC LIGHT CONTROL 15381 25 DALE PALM 181e ABERDEEN AV NE BREAKER FOR FURNACE HCOK UP 15382 7,500 PACCAR • 1400 N 4TH ST INSTALL CIRCUITS,FCWER POLES, 3 SPRINKLER PERMITS 300 4,800 PAT NEWBERRY 1705 NE 44TH ST HOOD FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEM MECHANICAL PERMITS ' 12507 1,500 PHYLISS THOMPSON 955 FERNDALE CR NE INSTALL FURNACE 12566 43,700 E & H PROPERTIES 635 PARK AV N 3 NEAT PUMPS, 1 FAN TERMINAL 12569 27,800 E d H PROPERTIES - 635 PARK AV N INSTALL 1 FAN TERMINAL UNIT 12570 42,100 E a H PROPERTIES 655 PARK AV N INSTALL ONE HEAT PUMP,5 FAN UNIT 12571 44,900 E & H PROPERTIES 635 PARK AV N INSTALL 2 HEAT PUNPS,1 FAN UNIT 12572 21.215 E & H PROPERTIES 535 GARDEN AV N INSTALL 3 HEAT oUMP,7 FAN UNITS 12573 30.180 E d H PROPERTIES 535 GARDEN AV N INSTALL 3 FAN PACKS 12574 12,472 E & H PROPERTIES - 535 GARDEN AV N INSTALL 10 VAV BOXES 12575 2.000i GEORGE CBERHOLZER 2315 VASHON CT NE INSTALL FURNACE 3 WATER HEATER 12576 25,599 FIRST CITY 520 NACRES AV Sw INSTALL A/C E DUCTWORK 12577 950 RICHARD NORDSTROM 1908 SE 21ST PL INSTALL WOOD STOVE 12578 2,025 HENDERSON HOMES 2050 ILWACC AV NE INSTALL FURNACE & WATER HEATER 12579 240 PRIMARK 555 BREMERTCN AV NE RA 16 BATH FAN , 8 DRYERS 12530 120 PRIMARK 555 2REMERTON AV NE PB INSTALL 8 EATH FANS, 4 DRYERS 11225811 12Z0 PRIMARK 55S55 BREMERTCN AV NE PC INSTALL 8 BATH FANS, 4 DRYERS 12562 120 PRIMARK 5;5 EREMERTON AV NE #0 INSTALL 8 EATp FANS, 4 DRYERS 12583 180 PRIMARK 555 BREMERTON AV NE PE INSTALL 12 BATH FANS, 6 DRYERS 12584 120 PRIMARK 4415 NE 5TH ST IF INSTALL 6 BATH FANS, 6 DRYERS 12505 240 PRIMARK 4415 NE 5TH ST INSTALL 12 BATH FANS, 12 DRYERS 12586 9,744 BOEING CC EOC PARK AV N 010-51 INSTALL DISTILLATION UNIT 12587 10,0000 MCDONALDS 705 NE 44TH ST INSTALL FREEZER,COCLER,ICE 125a8 8,700 PRIMARK 4415 NE 5TH ST IA INSTALL DEHUMIDIFICATION SYSTEM PLUuMBING PERMIT 1709 3,30L HENDERSON HOMES 2060 ILWAC❑ AV NE INSTALL 13 FIXTURES 1710 015 FIRST CITY EQUITIES 62C NACRES AV SW INSTALL ONE SINK 171� ,300 HENDERSON HOMES • 4828 NE 23RD ST INSTALL 15 FIXTURES 171 e,400 SHIRLEY PALM 1816 ABERDEEN AV NE GAS LINE TC FURNACE"/WATER HEATER SIGN PERMITS 1866 1,100 RENTON JEEP 201 S 7TH ST INSTALL SIGN 1869 9,000 THRIFTWAY 21 S GRADY MY INSTALL 14C SC. FT. WALL SIGN ISSUED -- . - - - CIIY OF RENTON 09/06/88 B"-'' ^LNG B ZONING' DEPARTMENT PERMIT5 ISSUED W ENDING SEPTEMBER 2. 1988 a ," BUILDING PERMITS 1411833 25,0000 SPIEKERpPARTNERS 433 SW 41ST ST TENANT IMPROVEMENT • - 14274 94.50Q GGEORGESCOOPERES 4005STEVENSMAVTSWE DECKTADDITION RESIDENCE 14275 2,000. CO VAN TRAN 1032 MORRIS AV S CONSTRUCT ADDITION 14276 191,314. VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER 40C S 43R0 ST TENANT IMPROVEMENT 14277 4,513 HENRY HICKS 483 DUVALL AV NE RE-ROOF 14280 6,500 VICKIE DOBSON 821 N 1ST ST REROOF RESIDENCE 14281 1,800 KEVIN SWANKE . . 108 WELLS AV N RE-ROOF. 14282 . 15,322 JIM LEE 1224 A9ROF" !1V NE C7N111 1UF T G E:i.• STO<RAGE AR 14283 „ 2,850 YLOVA MCKENNEY 540 WHITWOIiH AV S RE-ROOF 1422284 . pp ACCORD INC 216 RAINIER AV S DEMOLISH MOUSE 14289 1.155 BOEING COKaARZaLEH 1118p0o0 NN6THSST'T PARTITIONS 14290 1.100 BOEING CO 80C PARK AV N 10-474 MODIFY OFFICE ELECTRICAL PERMITS 15381 DALE PALM - 1816Q ABERDEEN AV NE BREAKER FOR FURNACE HOOK ppUPSS 15383 1,800 ALCNENISH 2000 N BEHSONSRD S INSTALL 20CCAMPSPANELRa CIRCUIT: 15384 1250 RICHARD NISMIO 210 WELLS AV S ADD 3 OUTLETS PER FIRE DEPT. 153865 Z.200 BOEINGDAN . CHAMBERS 631 FERNDALE AV NpE NEW CIRCUIT/OUTLETS LIVING ROOM nil; g8 880 PARK AV N V N A10-51 DISTILLLLATIIION UNIT 15IT 389 2.500 GEORGESOBERMOLZER 2I15 VOSnONACTVNEE WRIREANEWSRESIDENCE 15390 100 ROBERT FAULTINER 904 N 36TH ST ELECTRICAL FOR FURNACE 15391 6 ' DAN, CHAMBERS 631 FERNDALE AV NE ELECTRICAL FOR INSTALLATION OF 15392 7,800 E B M PROPERTIES , 635 PARK AV N TEMPERATURE CONTROL 15393 8.6 E B M PROPERTIES ' 535 GARDEN AV N TEMPERATURE CONTROL 15396 800 A. GALA / 711 SW 12TH ST INSTALL 125 AMP SERVICE SPRINKLER PERMITS 307 45,000 VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER 400 S 43RD ST SPRINKLER SYSTEM 314 610 BOEING CO 800 PARK AV N 14-20 - REPLACE SPRINKLER HEALS MECHANICAL PERMITS 12586 9.744 BOEING CO 800 PARK AV N 1051 INSTALL DISTILLATION UNIT 12587 10.0po00 MCDONALDS 17105 NE 4E 4S4Th ST INSTALL FREEZEER.000LER.ICE 11Z2588 589 2.2225 0 HENDERSON HOMES ARK 48288 NE 23ROST STAA INSTALL INSTALL FURNACE 8IWATERNHEATERM 12590 .2,72Q BRESSAN CONSTRUCTION 1715 UNION AV NE INSTALL FURNACE 8 WATER HEATER 12591 ,400 DAN CHAMBERS • 63 FERNDALE AV NE INSTALL GAS FURNACE 12592 266.161 E 8 H PROPERTIES 535 GARDEN AV N 6 FAN PACKS, 2 HP MOTOR/FAN 12593 8,888 THE BOEING COMPANY 80 PARK AV N 04-47 DISTILLATION UNIT 12594 900 TRAMMELL CROW 720 THOMAS AV SW . INSTALL OUTSICE AIR VENTILATION 12595 144 RICHARD GATHMANN 3621 SE 5TM PL INSTALL WOCDSTOVE PLUMBING PERMITS 1713 2,00020 1ST SUMMIT 1333 DUVALL AV NE INSTALL 7 FIXTURES • 1716 4 21.000 1ST SUMMIT 1332 DUVALL AV NE AB IC INSTALL 70 105FFIXTURES 1716 20.000 1ST SUMMIT 1717 100 DAN H. CHAMBERS 66331 FERNDALE AV NE INSTALL SINK 1718 1.200 NORMAC Z113 SE 8TH DR INSTALL PLUMBING 1719 800 MRS. GUNTHER 642 MORRIS AV S NEW WATER SERVICE 1720 250 JOHN BERGSTROM 34C7 NE 9TH ST INSTALL WATER HEATER ISSUED CITY OF RENTON ___ PAGE._1_. . __ ,__._ __,;. 09/09/88"- --__"-----B INGGPERMIONIIGSDEPARTMENT-�-'---- W.:.... ENDING SEPTEMBER 9, 1988 e BUILDING PERMITS 14278 78,513 HENDERSON HOMES 550p44 NE 23RD ST CONSTRUCT S/F RESIDENCE 6 14279 78.513 HENDERSON HOMES 2210 ILWACO AV NE CONSTRUCT S/F RESIDENCE 14286 30•p BUCHAN BROTHERS CONST. 365 RAINIER AV N TENANT IMPROVEMENT 14287 2,500 JAMES ARLINT 3908 NE 10TM ST CONSTRUCT SHED 14292 515,000 VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER 400 S 43RD ST TENANT IMPROVEMENT 14293q 2.193 LAURA KAHN 3318 NE 7TH PL RE-ROOF 4294; 1.6650 WILLIAM ALLINGHAM 30 LOGAN AV S RE-ROOF 1429 e000 BESSIE LYONS 1733 ROLLING HILLS AV SE RE-ROOF 14296 ;.000 ROBERT DOERSCt1EL 113 N 29TH ST CONSTRUCT SUNROOM 14297qg 1,977 TRAMMELL CROW 820SW 41ST ST RELOCATE VANGUARD WALLS 14299 Z2,34Q BOEING COOTM[ItS BOO PARKRAINIERA NVA1 6 INSTALL WALL 1430011 50.000 E64 0.8IH PRG OPERTIES 5353 GARDENK VAV N10-50 BODY CONSTRUCT EXERCPACE ISEFACILITY 1430203 99q,66112g0 ROSEMARYpL KAWINSKI 4413 NEEE 22U4TTHH ST LL CO NSTRUCT BATH E E REC ROOM 14304 60,0�7033 METROELL BANKER 1200 MONSTERERD SW INSTALL IPLATFOOCRMST 143083 4,733 TRAMMELL ECDONAHUE 61G TACOMATAYTNE CONSTRUCTHCARPORTSTORAGE SHED ELECTRICAL PERMITS 153954 1.500 PRIMARK CORP. 44443115 NE 5TH ST N0 INSTALL FIRE ALARM SYSTEM 153Q7 1.160 MENDERSONOHOMES 22078ELMARLYNNEV NE NE WIREANEWFRESIDENCE SYSTEM 153985 1,2502 HENDERSON HOMES 2229 ILWACO AV NE WIRE NEW RESICENCE 15600 1.200 HENDERSON HOMES 48g28 NEW23RDAV ST"E WIRE NEW RW ESIDENCE 15401 3,152 WINDSOR PLACE ASSOCIATE 555 BREMERTON AV NE NB WIRE APT. BLDG. 15402 9,44556 WINDSOR PLACE ASSOCIATES 4415115 NE 5TH NE 5TH $ S5T HT GEE WIRE APT. BLDG. 15403 154 WIRE APT. BLDG. 0b65 4�11500 JOHNsNAYPLALE WINDSOR PLACE ASSOCII�7E Z3100 NE 9TH ST Pt Nc INSTALL APT. BRANCH.CIRCUIT IN ADD. 15407 3.000 1ST"CITYPEQUITIES 620 NACHESRAVYSWE LOWLVOLLTAGEEHVAC CONTROL WIRING 154080 1.12660 HENDERSON HOMES 2004 ILWACO AV NE WIRE NEW RESIDENCE 15410 75p0 VAN HAREM CONSTRUCTION 6p00 SWE55THSCTVNIW NB TRASH COMPACTOR 3RDE4THOFLROGCORR. 15411 75500 VAN MAREN CONSTRUCTION b6b00 SW 5TH5TH CTCc MH LAUNDRY ROOM 3R0,4TH FLR.CORR 15413 750 VAN MAREN CONSTRUCTION 60 S.W1 5T CT OK LAUNDRY ROOM.3R0,4THTFLRLR CORRRR LDING 1y54175 4 6,000 BUCHAN BROTHERS 3655Z RAINIER AER V N WIRE BUILDING 15418 300 LEO AROBBINS DENTAL 280 HARDIE ST SW 02 EXTENDEONEEBRANCHECIRCUIT SPRINKLER PERMITS 308 19.000 1ST CITY DEVELOPMENT 1000 OAKESDALE AV SW INSTALL SPRINKLER SYSTEM 09 13,000 1ST CITY DEVELOPMENT 1000 OAKESDALE AV SW INSTALL SPRINKLER SYSTEM 310 1.800 BOEING CO 800 PARK AV N M10-60 ALTER SPRINKLER SYSTEM 111 1.200 BOEINGOp 1201 SW 7TH ST ALTER SPRINKLER SYSTEM 315 3,70025 MCDONALOS 4411"NE"ES AV SUNSETSW BL INSTALR LPFIRELER SYSTEMTE" 316 600 BOEING CO 800 PARK AV N 114-20 ADO SPRINKLER MEADS MECHANICAL PERMITS 12596 1,979 NORCON 2057 SE 8TH PL INSTALL FURNACE B WATER HEATER 12597 1,979 NORCON 2053 SE 8TH PL INSTALL FURNACE & WATER HEATER 12593 1.979 NORCON 2125 SE 8TH DR INSTALL FURNACE & WATER HEATER 12599 1,979 NORCON 2309 SE 8TH DR INSTALL FURNACE 8 WATER HEATER 12600 2,320 NORCON 2217 SE 8TH DR INSTALL FURNACE B WATER HEATER 12601 2,20 HENDERSON HOMES 2207 ELMA AV NE INSTALL FURNACE 8 WATER NEATER 12602 2.400 CHERRIE PALM 1816' ABERDEEN AV NE INSTALL FURNACE 8 WATER NEATER 12607 700 FLOYD CONRADI 612 S 31ST ST INSTALL GAS FURNACE 12608 7.000 SPIEKER PARTNERS 433 SW 41ST ST INSTALL 1 GAS/ELECT MVAC UNIT 12609 500 DAN MEREDITH 651 REDMOND AV NE INSTALL W000STOVE PLUM1BING PERMITS 1722 1.000 SUNPOINTE ASSOC. 510 STEVENS AV AV SW HE INSTALL 4 FIXTURES 1723 11.000 SUNPOINTE ASSOC. 510 STEVENS AV SW OF INSTALL 4 FIXTURES 1725 1,000 SUNPOINTE ASSOC. 600 SWE5THSCTVMHW NG INSTALL 4 FIXTURES 17266 111.p000 SUNPOINTES ASSOC.SS 606000Q SW 55TH [CT NI INSTALLS 4 FIXTURES 1728 1.000 SUNPOINTE ASSOC. 600 SW 5TH CT IIL INSTALL 4 FIXTURES 1729 2.636 NOREMAC 2217 SE 8TH DR INSTALL 13 FIXTURES 1730 2,100 BOEING CO aog PARK AV N N10-60 INSTALL RAIN LEADERS 1731 75 DAN CHAMBERS 631FERNDALE AV NE WATER HEATER 1732 3,300 HENDERSON HOMES 5150 NE 20TH ST INSTALL 14 FIXTURES 1733 3.2780 HENDERSON 5055 NE 8THDSTT INSTALL WATERxHEATER 1 35 300 JIM O'BRIEN 3734 PARK AV N INSTALL 5 FIXTURES 1736 650 JOHN NAY 2316 NE 9TH PL INSTALL 3 FIXTURES 1737 5.000 BUCHAN BROTHERS CONST 365 RAINIER AV N PLUMBING 1738 1.000 DAN CHAMBERS 631 FERNDALE AV NE INSTALL 4 FIXTURES 1739 222 MELVIN MORRISON 4909 NE 21ST ST GAS PIPING FOR GAS LOGS 17400 1.5000 LEO ZANGA 702 S 1150 S 266TH ST INSTALL 6TH ST z3 INSTALL 14 FIXTURES 1741 10,000 GARRITY COMPANY 1743 10.000 GARRITY COMPANY 1150 SS 26TH ST 0A-14 INSTALL 60 FIXTURES PUBLIC HEARING September 27, 1988 Page 1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING September 27, 1988 APP {ICANT: Bennett Community Builders, Inc. ff FILE: NUMBER: ECF 018-88 ; R 018-88 ; SA 018-88 LOCATION: 4200 Block of N.E. 5th Street A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: Applicant seeks to: 1) rezone approximately 1. 22 acre subject property from G-1, General Use, to R-3 , Medium Density Multi-Famiy Residential Use; and 2) obtain site plan approval for development of a 28 unit apartment complex to be called Heritage Forest Apartments. B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record: Leslie Danner; Edwin Ferkingstad; Linda Ferkingstad 2 . Applicant: Bennett Community Builders, Inc. 3 . Existing Zoning: General Use (G-1) 4 . Existing Zoning in the Area: G-1, General Use; R-1, Single- Family Residential; R-2, Low Density Multi-Family Residential; R-3 , Medium Density Multi-Famiy Residential; and B-1, Commercial. 5. Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Commercial Use 6. Size of Property: 1. 22 acres 7. Access: N.E. 5th Street 8 . Land Use: Property is presently developed with a residence and accessory structures. These structures will be demolished to facilitate the construct of the proposed Heritage Forest Apartment complex. 9 . Neighborhood Characteristics: North: Multi-family residential uses. East: Undeveloped property; Multi-family residential uses. South: Undeveloped property directly to the south; commercial development to the southwest. West: Multi-family residential use. C. HISTORICAL/BACKGROUND: BUILDING AND ZONING 115'TINRTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TC iE HEARING EXAMINER Action File Ordinance Date Annexation 2290 November 23 , 1966 D. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1. Utilities a. Water: The property is served by a six (6) inch line via N.E. 5th Street. b. Sewer: The property is served by an eight (.8) inch line via K N.E. 5th Street; an eight (8) inc�,line has also been 1.1 installed from Union Avenue N.E. o the western boundary of the site, on the parcel due west of the subject property. c. Storm Water Drainage: 2 . Fire Protection: Provided by the City of Renton as per ordinance requirements. 3 . Transit: METRO Route #114 serves the property from Union Avenue N.E. ; METRO Routes #107, #110 and #111 serve the property via N.E. 4th Street. 4. Schools: a. Elementary Schools: Honeydew Elementary School is approximately one-third mile north of the site. b. Middle Schools: McKnight Middle School is approximately 1 3/4 mile northwest of the site. c. High Schools: Hazen High School is approximately one mile northeast of the site. 5. Recreation: Kiwanis Park is approximately one-half mile north of the subject property. Windsor Hills Park is approximately one mile west of the subject property. Maplewood Playground is approximately one mile south of the subject property. E. 0 APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1. Section 4-704, General Use Zone 2 . Section 4-709A, R-3 Residence District 3 . Section 738, Site Plan Review 4 . Section 4-3014 (C) Hearing Examiner (Zoning Reclassification) F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT: 1. Comprehensive Plan Compendium, March 1986, Policies Element IV - Residential, pages 14 - 16. 2 . Comprehensive Plan Compendium, March 1986, Area-Specific Policies - Northeast Renton, pages 55 - 61. G. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1. The applicant, Bennett Community Builders, Inc. , seeks: 1) approval to rezone a parcel of property approximately 1. 22 acres in size, from G-1, General Use to R-3 , Medium Density, Multi- Family Residential Use; and 2) approval for a site plan for the construction of a 28 unit apartment complex. This property is presently partially developed with a single- family residence and accessory buildings. These structures would IMJILDING AND ZON_rNG Pr.0AI TMErim PRELIMINARY REPORT ( HE HEARING EXAMINER need to be demolished to accommodate the proposed residential development. ' 2 . Pursuant to the City of Renton' s Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43 .21[C] , 1971, as amended) the Environmental Review Committee, the responsible official, issued a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated, on August 8, 1988 . Mitigation conditions are listed as follows: a. That the applicant develop a design plan for open space, landscaping and screening which maximizes open space/natural environment for both habitat enhancement and passive/active ME'I recreational opportunities for re .dents (adults and children) . Note: The Committee felt the applicant should consider an alternative site plan that orients some of the buildings to N.E. 5th Street, thereby reinforcing the existing streetscape and placing parking at the rear of the site as a buffer between the units and commercial development to the south. b. That the applicant limit construction operations to hours between 9: 00 a.m. and 5: 00 p.m. on Saturdays and that no construction operations occur on Sundays to mitigate noise impacts. c. That the applicant be required to periodically wet down the construction site with water to limit dust and debris. d. That the applicant be required to wash down truck wheels with water prior to their leaving the site to minimize tracking of dirt onto the public right-of-way. e. That the applicant be required to provide a bond in the amount of $1, 000.00 to ensure street clean-up during construction operations. 3 . Various City Departments have reviewed and commented on the proposal. The majority of the staff reviewers recommended approval for the proposal with conditions. (See attached Staff Comments) . Two comments which need to be addressed are as follows: a. The Traffic Engineers comments have been modified. The new conditions which the applicant will have to comply with are as follows: 1. The applicant shall be required to pay a trip generation fee of $404 . 80. 2. That the applicant provide street lighting plans. b. The Police Department the applicant: 1) address the complex and 2) provide crime prevention hardware such as an alarm system, lightin dead bolts. REZONE CRITERIA 4. Section 4-3014 (C, 1) of the Renton Municipal Code lists three criteria that the Hearing Examiner is asked to consider along with all other relevant information in making a decision on a rezone application. a) That substantial evidence was presented demonstrating the subject reclassification appears not to have been BUILDING AND ZONING fry oaRTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT 'I'd HE HEARING EXAMINER specifically considered at the time of the last area land use analysis and area zoning. The subject property has been designated G-1, General Use since the property was annexed into the City of Renton in November, 1966. Since that time the property has not been considered for a rezone. (b) That the property is potentially classified for the proposed zone being requested pursuant to the policies set forth in the Comprehensive. Plan and conditions have been met which would indicate the change is appropriate. t4� The applicant's request does not conform to the City's Comprehensive Plan Map designation for the site which is Commercial Use Until December 1981, the Comprehensive Plan Map designated the site as multiple family. At that time the City Council adopted the Northeast Renton Plan which includes the subject site. In this this plan, properties in the immediate area of the site currently under consideration were designated either Commercial or Office/Office Park with the hope of creating, an employment base for the surrounding residential areas. Since the adoption of the Northeast Renton Plan, the City Council has approved rezones to R-3 , Multiple Family in the immediate area even though the properties were shown as potentially suited for commercial or office/office park development. This has been a transitional area since the plan has shown the area suitable for multiple family, commercial and office park development. Many of these properties which have rezoned for multiple family use, have been developed with multiple family projects. As stated in the Comprehensive Plan Compendium, the Comprehensive Plan is a guide for development which is not intended to be precise or dictate the future use of each parcel of property in the City. (c) That since the last previous land use analysis of the area zoning of the subject property, authorized public improvements, permitted private development or other circumstances affecting the subject property have undergone significant and material change. Since the last land use analysis of the area zoning, properties in the immediate area have been developed with multiple family projects, N.E. 5th Street has been developed, the Super Safeway store has developed as well as other commercial developments at the intersection of N.E. 4th Street and Union Avenue N.E. Water and sewer are available to the site. Therefore, there have been circumstances which support consideration of the rezone request to R-3 , Multiple Family. 5. The final test to determine whether a rezone is appropriate is to address the question of timeliness; whether the rezone of the subject property is appropriate at this time. Based upon the facts that the site is adequately served by public services; that the area has been determined to be better suited for multiple family development rather than commercial or office development,; and the fact that the property is the last site to be rezoned in the immediate area, staff have determined that the rezone request is timely. SITE PLAN APPROVAL CRITERIA WILDIrl AND ZONING V""'U TMEr]T PRELIMINARY REPORT TC iE NEARING EXAMINER 5. Section 4-738 (D, l) of the Renton Municipal Code lists ten criteria that the Hearing Examiner is asked to consider along with all other relevant information in making a decision on a Site Plan Approval application. These include the following: a. Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan, its elements and policies; See discussion above under 4 (b) . The proposed site plan request meets the Comprehensive Plan policies regarding the location of and development of Multiple Family ProJects. b. Conformance with existing land use regulations; The applicant's proposal complies with the development regulations for the R-3 zone. The site plan is predicated on the applicant receiving approval of the rezone application. c. Mitigation of impact to surrounding properties and uses; The project design is such that the applicant has attempted to minimize impacts to the surrounding properties by: l.Installing a six (6) foot high fence around the property (Note: The applicant needs to be aware that the six (6) foot fence will not be allowed along N.E. 5th Street. The fence may only be four (4) feet in height) . The fence needs to be asolid, sight- obscuring structure built of wood, brick or similar material. ; 2 . Orienting the development so that light and glare impacts on adjacent properties as a result of vehicles entering and leaving the site is minimized by shielding adjacent properties by the fence, landscaping and the location of the buildings; and 3 . Designing the bulk and height of the buildings in a manner compatiable with the adjacent projects. d. Mitigation of impacts to the site; The applicant' s project has taken the site constraints into consideration. The buildings are oriented in a manner which allows for adequate air and light; the buildings are not clustered together but rather there is come open space between each building; the buildings are oriented, to the greatest extent possible, in a manner which reduces the units which will have direct views into other units; and the landscaping areas designed to minimize damage in the pedestrian and vehicular circulation areas on-site. Finally, in order to enhance the design of the project and impacts of views onto the parking, the applicant should, limit the use of carports on the site to only the clustered parking stalls located in the center of the parking area. No carports should be located adjacent the buildings. Any carports which are used should be designed to be architecturally compatible with the exterior treatment of the buildings and should be softened with landscaping. e. Conservation of area-wide property values; The subject proposal is not anticipated to adversely impact surrounding property values and, in fact, hsould enhance those values. BUILDING AND ZONING P'"'AhR'iMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT T( HE HEARING EXAMINER f. Safety and efficiency of vehicle and pedestrian circulation; The applicant has worked with staff to revise their site plan to provide safe and efficient vehicle and pedestrian circulation given the site configuration. The applicant' s current plan does not appear to show a connection between Buildings B, C and D. This is will then provide complete circulation between all the buildings on the site. g. Provision of adequate light and air; The project has been designed to ensure that the proposed buildings as well as adjacent uses will have adequate light and air. h. Mitigation of noise, odors, and other harmful or unhealthy conditions; The construction phase of the project will result in some additional noise and dust will in the area. The applicant has agreed to mitigation measures to attempt to minimize the impacts on the neighborhood (See attached conditions in Environmental Determination) Once construction is completed, the project will add an increment of noise to the area due to the introduction of new residents to the area. No odors or other harmful or unhealthy conditions are expected to be generated once the project is constructed. i. Availability of public services and facilities to accommodate the proposed use; and The site is adequately served by publice services. Water and sewer lines are available to the site. Police and fire services are available to the site. The adjacent roadways are adequate to serve the project. j . Prevention of neighborhood deterioration and blight. The development will lead to the deterioration or blight '� of the neighborhood. H. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION: Based upon the above analysis it is recommended that the Hearing Examiner: 1. Recommend•to the City Council approval of the rezone request from R-3 , Residential-Multiple Family to B-1, Business Use. 2 . Approve the site plan subject to the following conditions: a. That the applicant comply with the mitigation measures of the Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated issued for the rezone and site plan approval projects. b. That the applicant pay a trip generation fee $404 .80 ($2 .37 x 6. 1 x 28 units)prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. c. That the applicant work with the Police Department on hte appropriate types of crime prevention hardware to install in each of the units. d. That the applicant provide a walkway extention between Buildings B, C, and D. WILDING AND ZONING a 'riARi'MEAT PRELIMINARY REPORT TG HE HEARING EXAMINER e. That the applicant provide designs the fence to be a solid, sight-obscuring structure built of wood, brick or similar material. ; f. That the applicant limit the use of carports on the site to only the clustered parking stalls located in the center of the parking area. No carports should be located adjacent the buildings. Note: The design of any carports used on the site should be designed to be architecturally compatible with the exterior treatment of the buildings and should be softened with landscaping. . . ro u. .; r) I♦ pt �� 'I rt. -mil :.�1:1 t � I ' • , _ r _ 1 1 a',.i.,:;,..0.l _ . .. .... . i;. 2 54Ila _ —1_�1 _ — -----._ 3 r err PL .i;tL1 & _ O � .t ^ it I,� • —� I L.;11,;°21.1:1..ti.1,1,: [7 1 t. r •1�:, ••it eE --II Il• R-11 ; .. . .. I 1"—2 — i GB IFEI ;;;+;4.;• a _4 -- F pup-j - a It-4 idig . B ---1- Ix I. i. , T; 1 1 i -- --- 3 -• • \4 1 4, r : :T _\ \ . 5u n ._ . , p PEKTY . . , , , ;. . ? _ .. i 0-P r t, :-. (' I i -,-'- - ? P I O 'Rlri11 BENNETT COMMUNITY BUILDERS , INC . HERITAGE FOREST APARTMENTS R-018-88 , SA-018-88 , ECF-018-88 APPLICANT BENNETT COMMINITY BUILDERS TOTAL AREA APPROX. 1 . 22 ACRES PRINCIPAL ACCESS N.E . 5th STREET & UNION AVENUE N.E. EXISTING ZONING G-1 , GENERAL USE EXISTING USE NONE PROPOSED USE 28 UNIT APARTMENT COMPEX COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN MULTI-FAMILY COMMENTS, LOCATED IN THE 4200 BLOCK OF N.E. 5th STREET, , ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF N.E. 5th STREET AND EAST OF UNION AVENUE N.E . r i , , ‘ ‘• .. ‘, \\..••°..j.. .-- i.:---:•r':•:',7.'"..-;... cl.'1 ' , r- _ I ./:'... . • . . ` _i -..-.,.,,. r---, •., .. . .. ..:,:. . ._ . v ,.... '4,;........ f:•-:,,'.;,,-,, '''.:.!.:2,,!-;:;'•°., . •:1.7 .4',:..,,i7;.:::: ::,. - . . . .. . .. V '7i.:':' '''..,'""••••:;-;`:'''::::•;-.1.4:::::E.''ii,'..-.1 .z.:: •• • , :" i,• '•:''-• .• • ''' • ' ••• ,• ( Scale 155 =2000' -.,...&,..(s..,,,,t..,,,.t,.e--;',::::,.:::r:7••••=:' ..:-, .•::-.:.-•::'.7';',:::r :••'..'-''.., .,.-.:,.: •• • :";\,._,2,n,,,,•'•'.... •1131 NI%...0.. .011•,,:t•-•-r,..,!,„:1,:•• •••.,•;,.t,:;‘:..,....n.:':,....,:.: ,.!..;;;,,,...tr,......Sy..,'''::r.:.:t.,.'..••,.•.... ,,':• .. - '.• ••'•••• : ilk .;": ..".6....'C-1-'' 44::';::!:5';'',',..i,).4';NI:•••••,:..;.''';;:%.:.1:;'''(;;:',...:,...:•,..:.1...:: 7. . . ''1! 14 ' •-•,,I...,-:,..., ;.: `41".;••- . •......, , .".-• s' ..::4'),-',4*.,) .. ... , .' •••••'`'r....,.. 1:. ' . .: " '''' "..- ' •-.... .r..0,.•4',000000000 4, , ...... •. ..:.„. •„ .. .. .. ._._ ...x • „ ,..,.....,:l ':.).:--•,.. :, - .,,•"„" T )...• .i: / i .. '''.. :.s,...... I 1 • , /.- tist.::::::::„:,,.,.,......,:... •.,...„.,..... •...::•:‘.,:,. ,,.„,„..:,./•.. ,,.......,_, ... . . 1 r.—. ,•—,t...9 VA,:...i::-'::' .. • 1.1-...',......;'.: 1111--7 ,,, -'''.. N., .... .., .., 111 . ri•.3 1 i i . •7';'-- . ' 814 lIt'ti- ,...•,.• msne ..:.:::,:,:,:,:,il,...1.; ,.5,.. ,..... ) -Ilfill'i' —.0 -------- ...:. . : - 1111111 ll'A''' 110 •0000. j :.:Liii r: 1 riofo°41 • '-- i All , .4P.o: I '', 1111.11116N 40211::.. .O. i'VI.-... ...-... ".-.. .-.- _.-.- •IL. 000000 .0., 1- i 1 • - i, . ... .. ..... . .. . •••,‘•-...40:t. . u:::i::::i*:*::.,•••••••••••••.4._. .1., :iii• .. ....... t) -- 1: .:.: ,, ::::::::::::::::•:::::::::.:,... 11 .. ••••••••••••••••.. , ..00.Ingi,. 00000000 00000000. * ••. 1:,•1 ' *:..i.:.::i..::.:,...ri-......-- *.i: • hi ,•,„ , 0.0000 • .....• ,...._••._,.,:),,. .,,:::„. :.,,,,,: ::r...,j.„. 1.1,,,.,::,„,:,:.:,,,,,,,,. i...,4),„,, ,/ 0_4.04 , Do.... _... . , 8 .0.00( • 0.0.00 • .-...ie. —(! , Q\ •\_• • • •::::::::::::::.(.•:•:.:.:••". :. •:::% ...../ 4 •.......„ iti \ • • • • :, .• ::::::::::::::::, :".• •• • •••• ' 1 1 • vs, • • •„ i*i::::::i:.::: :.: 1 0 i .11 1 lb In= •,.;c...,, ..___L_____:0...._.._ • •, • • • ... •, . .: 0.0.• • •;• • • i., . .:: . I. • ..... .0. .•• • • • ,., .:::: I pi 7.--:=---71:61 . • • • • • ,.: 7 ... , .e. >0.....A.0.0.0 0. .,, • • • •• • ,,,‘ „ all ce.!sif..: °.°. ( , .......... . ika_• • • :, , ...c..5,4 P°' ,,,, * -.%. • • • • ••• •:•::•:•:•:•:•::::::. -1C....._ • • • • • • J., •,1 ,`A-'1' gl.;; -::•.- lir g — _ • • •• • -.`,... \ 00 .:•:•:• :•. •o . • • • • i0 • "...:,.. , .:::::::::.:.:•" ..:•:•:.:•:.:...... I v • • •,_• '',.ci. ,'• :i::::::: .41 • • • • • • "I... ...•. Ad :•::::::::::.. ..::::i:i:i:i*i:i:::p. :::„..... • ............... .............. • • • • • 4?,,. A iik41:::::::.„i. ..8 .0, • • • • El • •-••i iii 1.:,.::4 . .. • .0 . . ”i Ilei •v. . 4L N :11 T1 1•;•••••••:••• ,:1:),.. Ilk qg et$a f 1 •••nio • it ,,y #4 I:. .1.!4!) far*/ 1 pri •A. . .. . ... •:,::::::::::::„,..„ •,. Viiiiii:.... ••°°°° : ;:•i";:i:i:i:*::::•;::: . • .---i: _____ \,. vi. ,.: ..i:i: :M4 L 44 ._.... • ............ el 1 W''..........ri NEN Alisi*.•‘;''-'-'‘:::::::iiii7::::77:.iig:0""::.::.:. •:.:::..oloh°,..°0'.. 101211! °:::,710.0%.°0°09:70.2 • iihilt11111111,-i.ii kz.,•7••••-••••••••:,:i:Wv -- ..:AIMS' AtP• iXV..eiliiiiIiiiik'', ..*:i:::::: P"./......::::::::a::: Toft°00Efic,ft°10.;•°00:0`?1,F00:0°00°E , ::•ii:iiiiiiiiiii.:;,' :g M :.':.:::::Ei..:•:.i::.::::::.:.::.:;.:i. AY' .z..21. c...io:iiiiiimi, ,_. ••...:.,;:iiiiiini::Ei wocao000.0.0.00,0.......0.0.0000.0c; .. opire:_, ,(t,,,r....... .. :.....,...,,.,,,.... ..0:::.:.:.::::: ::: :::::*i _.,..0.0.0.8100.0..0.....0.00.000.0000„ ,...:.: .c.„ .::::::::::::„.. ..,...................... •.......•••• 4Il LEIF At 1 . --,••.::•,!•• ' ..;a• -`,.• •:::::i*i;i:::::::::if;:ii:::„.:.::::i 09306o0o0o0o0o.o.o..0o.o0o0o.o.o0o00.00 iz;;: ::: o.00 I / . .;')• 1 _ °II°3 111111?/*1 Z.• .. o o o o o o o .. 1 1. ..s., 'I .--. 0 0 0 ••••••••••••••••• 0 00 0 0 00 000 0 0 0 0 000 00 I.....,....::.:, o o o o . :::::::i:::i::i:i::i: o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 0000000 ..........:.:.:: . .;,.., 1117. :::: t g /.. 00.0 • •:•::::::::::::::::•:.:.:•:.:.: 0 0_0_0_0_0,00cm 0.8, :.:::.:.:.:.:::::h :.:.:.:.:. )000,000.... fp., •1. I. ••••• `i 1 111 o o o a o ••: **i:i:i:i:i:i:::i::::::::::: '-'-• .O o o o o o o o• .:'4••;••;:•:•:•:•:. • 00000000 .., . ..r....,.,•.....: 0.00.0.. .,.;":41y .....:-.=4.t•e. ,-,. F,, :i:::::::::::::::::::::i:i: ,. .0.0000`Mac'0°. .4.: {,',',:_•, :.:i::::::' •.Y. .'' •:•::::::::::::::::::::::::: . .. •0000000. . .•..•.. ... . ''''.'.1 0000.000. . " " . Ili .4 ' x:.,:•:,%:.,:.x.:.• . ,c ..,:.72;.1 , •••0°• ..i. ::.• ,:•:•:•:•:•: t.„.......7-- '.1-?,, .\ .... .s. II,i : i:i: : :ii • l•,1'6,-'lle''''•:•., .:-I', '.:••.':•:;.:.:.:.:.: 0'' - AMIN I .', ' 4 •---Qua,.4,_:',:•43 , ili. ,. ':iMii:i::* .; 7.','.;!?.-','..):-....:;',',:j'.:(;,-'.3.."'..7../.,,. ":. :?:::: ii.::,: :. '‘47,i.3..?„1.„ ... ,....I I."'u;;r;:''''-r.".;',;!.?.1-0,,'.'.-'4.;",..,...•',..;•:).','W.',':,''.7'..::?;;;),:;::;.i;',.....,•;!, :::',..1;•'.;'',;;;:',. 1:.::::..i::: :::.:. 0 ..T.':;',. • .• I . •ii 1--- ,..j.i),A',,,n:a.:Pe.,••%•6;....;„11.-•,`4,: ?,:•:".", ..:;:%•`;;I:;i).':;:l.),f:;;::;)•-;,:i',•.;;;),--;•;;;r:',.1......:`:")., .•:::::.::::h::::. •1::; :i:V1 .. 'd ''.";.;Y.:, :••••041rior,;o:', iisk.-.<ii„.• ,,,,:.<•.1;.•,,,•:,•-,-,..- ---••••,..,•, ,..,-..,•.•• •v.c,,i)•<.!-.<• "•::••••:. 4,:,:.• ..„•<• -,..,•,•;,. .:. -,c-re":,,,,--y(-1; is g,,•••,.0.•:,;:•,...• ••••;...,--, ••••• ,••f!,;,•?1•"•;.,.- ,2,n •• -J°'' , ' •n:-,,r.,';,-,;&:.. ':. .90,tM.,, '7.,i• 'hb6....:_:.% .'•':41: 14&(`-,,...' % 8 ':'''•'' ..:',•', ''.'... !'::.:'t','• .:,:ii,'..tY0,.,., •.4 ,1;: ,.,..1..',.......1-°I° :(44c;!.?;,4.4:4/74 .'"'"'.fr;4(1,Q4A,-.1,1 .:,..1.•.:::.....'' ,.',,'e...;":ei:'-'.. Ii 1111r....„........4,..._, .4.- ,e,,,i,..'.••?.:n...0,., ••• ......,.. .L.,:A....g.e2j._,4....,Thr,••,..;,4 ZIA4 4111:4412", %:,:rel..id.4,714 vi.' : -'' ' ''' -II ... .-4,'":::;%,''.).`:ki."?...`:.•>-7-7r-7r7-1717;,77:-:-;:;:;"... ',.""*. AN'',(rt.C r•Or:',•':,V;',.';I' .:', ' -.,,,, ,?k;.,;!'•:,•c),,...?:,',',•';1';,•::',....•'A_;•;',?;..-:,'?,:,:•,.....,',, . , • .. 444.,....„.:...‘,,,, . ,. , ..,,b.,.. .„.c„.,,••;,,,,.......:•,!..;:,..i::•::••:•.•••••••.,i' ; . • ---- s•••4'.i.1,-,..c.% rcr,•y. :. .•• . 116 .... ... •c.c.00.3 I pc : ..00, Kt(i.•,:.:Me'1)'!.!'N':.;.'‘'• •'..-':::.,,, •r;•:•:. • . • .. ..(:;'-t-4•21• ... .:; le-,:'1AVt4"c.C1:•„ ,•,,.1 0 0.9, •,..1.N•,f;5.0,•-•••- • :. .r.:•-• ./ ..e.,, ,e.rkr.c 0..r.VC.-cc„.......1,..,. „e];,,,• •7,••'''.;';',F.:I'4-C.J.a'5... ';'(2.' ,9).ts-,4:-,'-•,t iN,0 -•-, ,-„:,•::.- .. Ytt. r .....r.,' -.<. • .. .f f.'S.V.::''1•:'41,..nn.',.g;t,•;i0CYjC7•::-ti...,':. • 1 '•-••.''''..71'':'" .i'6"j '''.1.'.4r4:4•'''' X ...'''11•rind,'r5i,"I'....r 1...; c..., ,.••t-''.',.,..1.,•• •:-),;,. ,s: ,,....,•\.\ •!3.:r.ern A,'-' • ';'e• (..‘, ,.."%i'e"We'•‘,,. .177.--7>-7\,„? 7_ •o' ..`••,-..•;4;',, ,ir,J':PC..Y'...-.1'.:7'0.P q.t..;, ,„%ln.,.tv:,,On,c-)•;,,-*.n.,,,,.••.:,,,,'., '., .t., n •-•':,,.-',,,,Viiki , • ' t.'„!-,,..e-rc,1::.,--:,:l..,..r, • ..:, ;••,s1,:,r-,,' ..,?,V%.r.1.•:;-.•%A.-,',.•:,-....,- ,4;.:,f,..:•,,,s. 111111.1.1. 11' t* 0. ••• „.:., ..••,f3•• ••• •,...,, .. ••,,,,,. 01......11: frpP •..r•0,r.,' ;Jr 7,....T__,;• , . ,•••/:-?:.1 1,,..,,,,.,.,,,,1,1_,:„. n,•,... ,1..•-•,c.,'',..',,t,•'.,,,;O...flb . ... :.' ',:'07)%:(t,•'.7/'••-•..1."•..,:cilj..,.2.kl,',..1 6'.....,':11>,"„. t!I i LANDUSE ELEMENT ...rt •. • .i-:F....- '--4'b''-'0—`-''' -- • :"! .`. "."' • ', . 'il .., :-,.;c..14';.. ,. , ---- ---, . •, .:, ., , • C 07)(lAfif.;'.1r,' ,4;i11....i.•:•1)1!.t•-•D 't NN/• ., •t-p, +,.,r....clif...t••••€.1:,,,,,,:lig.re . , • erst .... ;,,..,-.,„• .....-.4.c rricir.:.''.•''....1 ' i ' ..•: • • -...cci':.'l r..if.Y•r(1.11 e cil c•rti4•11(t., \-• •• --' i ,.. ,..,• up! § ' ' IIIIIIII -..„ Ftr.t:•,,,' •••• ,..g:g( . Single Family 1E11111 ComMercial • _ :...: 't". i .... .. .•„,..,-, .. ,•., . . . . . ''---4r m, <,• ." ,-,,.• . • •'',.., . •.,,f,'':'i.,...' '-. .';i...s: '''),:'''• --- .tli((i 4 . .:,•,.,.',,.i',!:,.‘,...)/"..<,''tt .,.,,. .,. -----t -----:--.-• . i - ''' -n" '•'•' n,"VI,-el '.n'i•.,11111k, -:..--'0,,,-..- P , . .A.,Low Densi Office / Office Park mily ty ,:.:.;:.'ft,-,',,...';'?„?.,,. , -ft . . -.'.,...:<:,:!•,.. .,-... -.....,,::.;..,.), ,:.1.,:„ .•, -,-.:,..,,tz,-1,.!,„ .,•,, Multi-Fa ...,) •,:,• .,.!••. i 1 ,bia..i% • ;,,A.P. t'l r, •.,,, „,••,,,,,N, . . F.1^..r. 0 C•b, Ile i::'•'.4.',i.,-'1•L- 41i.• ..i, ...c.o.... •\ 7 •:, Public/Quasi-Public J...0.:;Jo. ''1!...(?...',..1•.:,•:. •‘7.h..7 Medium Density ...,,..., ,00.„..., .,.• •.,.. . •,'.. ,.. ,,• ••••,,, ,,,,,, ... - ,..„,-.0..,-r-. , ,,,w..,,;;;.... `Y-V.1,;i,s.:, 0.0.000, ::::',;,.',.:):•<,i<.•.,,: ,•:.;c.3',.:‘''••"3-.3 0,7`..•.L.5).3:Z'4..•^":'• .. . .1".... : '!":.,.30,'s'.?.,.,. ...,.„.t.c.4;-„,• • ..- — . ... ".."•44....,i,,::•;s;..,,,..:,'f,;,,,,,1!.•,,,, . :i1;‘, . . . , '.., .,t c-,,,.>-1 .. , ....4: ..;:I.. .• Light IndustrialP,..: . :,,,...,:..•,:•,z.„.,,„,,„.,....„ <, <, ••• (!•.0,2.„•ia.,::•,.• 0.„..to;‘• ,......................... I.,0,,.;.•:„..:0 ..,„,..•.q.•.,--,„; ,. -• . '4.19:",144,,,`.•,;:,„ P:(.411iit.:i•c7:'s • • • Recreation -4,6PAli, • • • Heavy Industrial • • • • • • •• ...• :.,,,,...:,,<,.., ,,,,..„.•:6,.,. INF ,..):-.4.g,,,:i•.,„,..,-• • •„-,•ft,,9„'i?:.:*.,:a..• )000.30.. rillit\e..,;:, Ili& -7•',Jo ,R)„,,,,Q,,..,,, op000poo.. 11,.3000.0.30.000.0.0m00.0...( eir. c•c•0u '• CC241 . ..(13Y. .300.3000.00 .• ..,, .00. g 000.. ..:. (•,;t•.,,, •3000u00, 000, , ...S a •.•. 00, . *0°09,9)V6_-_-_-_-_- )0000000 r,-..;.` 0 ' ik .00000. 000000 , Greenbelt, -;_-=_-=.-_---_- Manufacturing Park ,n a o 000000. •...•,:., ipri ,., . %4%14- •.•.r.,z r, 00000 ooc , A'',"-,e 6 1,1%,:•,. ; i Multiple Option '\ ....000.0 , pra0„0,= #•'.. \. • ., 111. -,---,--h mn , , CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO. : ECF-018-88 APPLICATION NO(S) : R-018-88,, SA-018-88 PROPONENT: Bennett Community Builders DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application to rezone approximately 1. 22 acres of property from G-1, General Use, to R-3 , Medium Density - Multi-Family Residential ; and application por site plan approval to allow the de 'elopment of a 28 unit apartment complex on said property to be called "Heritage Forest Apartments" . LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 4200 Block of N.E. 5th Street, on the south side of N.E. 5th Street and east of Union Avenue N.E. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Building and Zoning Department The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probably significant adverse impact on the environmental . ' An environmental impact statement .(EIS) is not required under RCW 43 . 21C. 030 (2) (c) . Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-2822 (D) Renton Municipal Code (see attached sheet) . These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340 (2) . Because mitigation measures were applied, the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fifteen (15) days from August 8 , 1988 . Any interested party may submit written comments which must be submitted by 5: 00 p.m. , August 23 , 1988 , in order to he considered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period will commence following the finalization of the DNS. Rerponsible 'Official ; Environmental Review Committee c/o Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator Planning Division Community Development Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 PUBLICATION DATE: August 8 , 1988 DATE OF DECISION: August 3 , 1988 SIGNATURES: _ s Ronald G. Nelson Lar Springer Building Official Planning Manager Richard C. Houghton Public Woi s Director • DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED MITIGATION MEASURES PROJECT: Bennett Community Builders Heritage Forest Apartments ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF-018-88 , APPLICATION NUMBER: R-018-88 , SA-018-88 DESgRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application to. rezone approximately JJ 1. 22 acres of property from G-1, General Use, to R-3 , Medium Density - Multi-Family Residential; and application for site plan approval to allow the development of a 28 'unit apartment complex on said property to be called "Heritage Forest Apartments. " LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Located in the 4200 block of N.E. 5th Street, on the south side of N.E. 5th Street and east of Union Avenue N.E. DETERMINATION: The ERC issued a Determination of Non-Significance —Mitigated - for the proposed rezone and site plan on August 3 , 1988 , with the following conditions: 1. That the applicant develop a design plan for open space, landscaping and screening which maximizes open space/natural environment for both habitat enhancement and passive/active recreational opportunities for residents (adults and children) . Note: The Committee felt the applicant should consider an alternative site plan that orients some of the buildings to N.E. 5th thereby reinforcing the existing streetscape and placing parking at the rear of the site as a buffer between the units and commercial development to the south. 2 . That the applicant limit construction operations to hours between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. on Saturdays and that no construction operations occur on Sundays to mitigate noise impacts. 3 . That the applicant be required to periodically wet down the construction site with water to limit dust and debris. 4 . That the applicant be required to wash down truck wheels with water prior to their leaving the site to minimize tracking of dirt onto the public right-of-way. 5. That the applicant be required to provide a bond in the amount of $1, 000 to ensure street clean-up during construction operations. OTHER: In addition, the applicant is advised to provide a soils report which confirms the suitability of the site for the proposed infill and development, subject to approval by the City. Y � • R"EVIE4"WTNG DEPARTivMENT✓DIVA )N OI •,.fn APPROVED • ' APPROVED WITH H CONDITIONS EI NOT APPROVED ‘() 1- C_C(.31(1/f\r‘ciVD 3 * of holivhxrv► c_v Loin or Lisilur).scfPi/v 1103 d .TI 6 ? 0ftt ( i\JC, ( ` l Kal I\,e siLt S E6{. `� I C 'I(6 51 Poly I-IoUSc.ivIpj PLAN ILLl.,6 'RA1!' 2 , 3 , de f' IOC.II.U6, i IZC i IN-KO ( SwS k , . fir. IIL(r, PL N ) ) r �)11L DATE : '1"13.-88 . SIGNATURE OFJIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 —_ _c Form 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : ( ( -,( tatQ/J n APPROVED n APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS �n NOT APPROVED I t ctY). An40)(&:J eL°'''cg [UTILITY APPROVAL SUBJECT Till LATE COMERS AGREEMENT-f ._^R _-_ I NO_._1` • LATE COMERS AGREEMENT-SE:.'.Z /i9 I 00 SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CIIARCE-IVAIZR r' �'� C.InI?`s' . ' "T/ / p0 SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT WIFE-SEWER' S. S.If A .1 z'!/'ct lf3 = I 1Q' -✓ SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE-WATER /``/p 049. . SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CGAf;:;E-SEWER No N°PROVED WATER PLAN _ V f•16-9S -66 /' EPPIIO rro SEWER PLAN 5 ! _ y ( �) ; ' • APf RRED FIRE IIYGRAr:i Lu !iri DY rIPE rr'T. : ::,+. .. :!J • DATE ; ` " SIGNATURE OF DIRE TOR OFt AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 • REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; ,( \. \ r\ �-��.�" \(.1• kM\ r n APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS n NOT APPROVED �C �/�e'`" lll�/ �� d e �Te.ve,- �`�Gt' • & eJ f� gio/aff I it e L°o-1/d �e t GU�(,C eo� JC f)khoeot zA.Ai - w / rxra / t%e 1/./2.4.4y� Dl,,t9/2 f .2a/e l�l o 41 o 67‘//e itA,1 L • DATE : 1J /(, /2 l gcP/fs STGNAkE OF DTR• T.OR OR AI.JTHPRIZET) REPRESENTATIVE DEPAP. MEN 1 /D1Visir)i,l , r ' �, �. �� '� l I, �+ �. � id ,T APPROVED l RI-PROVED WITH CONDITIONS KNOT APPROVED C-7/ev't-r 'ft3 P-1"-4L • /43L-Q-st „. „L • J • DATE: - /2 - SIGNATUR F IRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 COhMENTS. r Pill«� : r�e4/Zt /� s�..r ,Z L .4; � ,�, Z �3 G `?I-r s /1 D/)/Zif5 d /Y 41 Gf/ l f,1A' f'iZzc.,lcT ic'S L L_ • .G)e !) /S "/. f We have ' reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have t xpertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional i formation 1 ' needed to properly assess thi$ proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date rl�J Form 4 r • REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; �, ; ,(.�c . l •• 1 l f� f� ti 9APPROVED n APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED env,`c� Z z X 3 y �� Imo — ce — . V 6c:ice-I 3) y 024. DATF : STGMATHPF- nr • • REVIEWING DEPAR-,MEJT/DIVIS.„,J , r1R6 ma/EIJI lou El APPROVED [1 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED Any development and/or construction shall comply with current Fire and Building Codes nances. • - and Ordi- A second means of approved access is required. Fire Department access roads/lanes shall be paved minimum width 20'; minimum height 13' 6". Yes No..._,. Preliminary fire flow calculations show a fire flow of ,t 7,rp required. 7 hydrants with a minimum flow of . /ar is Is required. gpm each Primary hydrant is required to be within 1.510 Secondary hydrants are required to be within .3o feet of the str of the structure. feet of the kn approved automatic sprinkler system is required to protect the total structure. Yes_ No. '' kll fire department access roads are to be paved and installed pridv,to construction. Yes �.. kll fire hydrants are required to be installed and approvedNo ..� prior to construction. Yes,..� No SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVEATE ; � �Q, /9� REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 I REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : r?L_� El APPROVED i APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED C� ✓C. �s ��:.,� yy Li"v S s 1?G- --__-Aloc-J..1 , r (-) L )7:US n - ,•,,, E II v Ein) Fil J.UN 3 019038 GM111( ...,:.1.+, • 7..C•NINc3 li IT1 I • SIGNATURE p'.. 'RECTOR OR AUTHOR ZED REPRESENTATIVDATE._ �� j REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 2EV.IEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; -sIu ;'UI ,(, , • I ( APPROVED RI APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED , 4, 572)---"ef .6.2 7/ /_, . / 2/, • . -•, ;-),),.p , , s ,.. ( :(--((.0 ii, / 1. ...,-:- 4 e, 20 / // /^/c„,_..., J ---)^cr-, I.,I..0 ) \('r'd r- r� 1 dc„.-4--,_,-.---/ /Vec?A2 .S-E- .(--- 15/.:-D et).-__.;---..._qj . • zig; 4 .-,- lea--,�--ma�c -- DATE IGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR,-/UTHORI7FD RFPRESFNTATTVF ��� /� f rye' PLAN REVIEW ROUTIN SLIP - ATTACHMENT Date 12-8-87 APPLICANT: Windsor Place Assoc. JOB ADDRESS: 455 Bremerton Ave. NE NATURE OF WORK: Revisions REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Traffic Engineering 1. Street lighting plans required on 22"x34" mylars and to City standards To Include: N.E. 4th Street street property frontagi' N.E. 5th Street Anacortes Ave. N.E. 2. Need completed plans for two-way center left-turn lane on N.E. 4th Street at Anacortes Ave. N.E. The proposed two-way center lane is to be matched into the existing two-way center lane to the west of Anacortes Ave. N.E. and match with the County proposal to the east. 3. Provide a left-turn pocket on Anacortes Ave. N.E. at N.E. 4th Street. 4. Full street improvements required on N.E. 4th Street across project frontage no end near Union Ave. N.E. (north side) . 5. The most southerly driveway onto Anacortes Ave. N.E. is to be an emergency access only with chain. 6. Mitigation fee for signal coordination in the N.E./N.E. 4th Street traffic corridor. Fee charge is $2.37 per trip generated Project Phase I 158 units Project Phase II 44 units Apartment general trip generated per unit 6.1 Phase I $2.37 x 6.1 x 158 a $2,284.21 Phase II $2.37 x 6.1 x 44 636.11 Fee Total $2,920.32 Fee to be paid at time permit is acquired. . r • MEN Mt 0.E I ' I ' I •C,4 ZZ ea • AIIfl697 ' �-------- I . - 1 . 1446 • ' rT Z9 .4 —f -- r• ae•.a \ \ ( 3 [.L fti MEET f .Aw,atcs — — -- IWNIRCLI /LItirt/ -�`\ P � ` 1 ` +.� ��2111141124411414. 5 thR05.11,444v 0 ixr aaM r��; —t�.1��0 _"—lial Mil l 1 ihi .... A I »Mfg �. / ilk m 4 t 'I II �_f ��` L H • M'. — I N - (� I �� ,:11 �il 114-1 0 "' \ \\ \ t r. IE 4 th F r...4 1 t I • 11,Y '� \ \ \ \ Ill rr-��,` \ m r�TF' 1 I �YIE� 1! ICI \\ \\ \ �l�t1 \ m rE:fil395.' -am.. +��� ligli. .�'' f.,r, of ill!" \\ VIGIN f1Y kw' .let a Pr 3 4' 1M 11611MIL ",' =."--" t — I 1ill Mprgr".in..' • • ---rl 1 \\ Ira ` 1`1 �•\ _ \ \'f\ \ A.w ta.,aa-�vr� 3 Y•�.., I •' I 1 \\/ �-• t \ 7 1 _• .f� tai 7-=-.. 1 \ B 7 . ,r... \ire \ \. �� \ �� FI �w.r' r- Y►)i�- 4 NagaArT• 0 r \ \ • two U • '.1 \ 11..i 9 . r„,„:.• -, , ._„,, . .......,...........i!> .4T,t rt. vrilpZ API,' • \ U,�si•woo E"t FF 95.0 FF�397-f 1 \ • \\ I, 1 ,,. ‘ ...._. _ \\, 'nq a / �J\ f L. • r • r J 1� , I�� 1 FP��97.2\ 1.1..nP 71� • �1► OAf \; I 1O ,M�.1•J���_ ri�s7 I I \' ]� , ., \ �� \\ \ \\\ iErb B-� W of __ I _ 711 s+] sw �c� \` OM �v{y.Y vN • �/ ^I IJ i' ..••Ma. • M('1♦ �L>f ♦ _ - .•AI ' PROJECT NO E 4 i uP,oEvE ,, • ..-. " /^` y DRAWN BY i . Y _ TONING MAP . ISSUE GATE I I -• TUNE 20.11i4.. PROJECT DATA• BUILDING DATA LATEST REV 1) w.uain0 a(f-..n1si) - ... ......... ..... -- I ->,.mlti/doer aNS ar -' 1) >s1.c1q im1n0 _ R-] as^-- lif if t I i • • ]) Situ A��� - 1.22 Set,. a) Building a (a uniti) • (3]"143 S.r.) -]uniu/Locos • 3104 it -- - �� �/ I • q comity lils••e docks ISf ar .7PY1G 41AY I • 0 a3 u,t.,.c. - ]0°niu ]) Building C(3 or _ . ' - - S) De.uler reepoiia - 3i unCUS -a uelti/tleor - Sa]0 Sr -- "ea- . CITY GF F'EP ITOi. f) r.runa a.w.a.a "cam l..i. .1.]] -/unit - of swc al °ullalnq o f6 Units) ]t33 sr f• • 1• • ') ems• iP•o•'�i,•_f•x 11-0�u aseti lea Sr LTA (J I• - 27.::::::'-:1-:. s ao•-°• S) O.11a1o0•(s uniu,• 33°s cr — �!�1 kP (9 ii�ak21.6 Ceti • 13f Sr it 4a ]],33i ar(ai%) f) li0esi3Ai 1t 3o.s1.it(aot) .' laiiie3V Sf101rr) liP••lc riraln0. • .1a0 M- 3]"lf]A(l0oe) Total lapr.ioai Arse •]a3af it r f.n 1�?j .` --- ' CIVIL ENGINEERING AND II •� AClFIC ENGINEERING COMPANY PLANNING CONSULTANTS 0�.i' .- fig'4 n f Asl1!'.� ,i;,;y�1't• t <• gVi,r�sf'cvftri.9i�•iati� - • i - E • . . . i I I ' . . . . . . . . . . .• • . . . . • • • " • " • . . . . . . ...., • • • • . . s ... UNION 5C0 CONDOMINIUM r ivq .. . 7 ri 9 . Fli • 1! . . 2 . j• ..- I rj • \ 6...monume..... a 1 11,1" Ll • ,..-P7RE NYDR4V7 Ihk .. ... L'Il.111111/11.mimmi.c111111M14 " CASED - --'-'. ---:=. 7=•..•.7.7------:- . r.• :.77:.-.,--1?--•—r."--0'7'-'.5., "77-.%•-i-7-77° ----'--7-7-- •-•••• • - •,•,-. ' ..- ..- „irms4.0, . ......."1.5..: - ....cs,..m.egy.w.eft aall=1....10.11t-ve• (4.10,4 . - .. , . '''..:.11,/ .-if `-:"4:•- _.,‘").- ,..14; ...:•".• .-- -- -...1....-. • "Y •,-'', rhe'-',4. 4.,-,..,,_.,...!,t2f4,.4.4.1- - • 7.,c./.' -;:,_1,77',;'..4 •,4.,..-0 •.-,,.:, , .7.-,'•• , _zA'.•;;;A:; '-,:. f•'P.-. - -,t!--2 .:.\ .4.`,..•••• i• .T• • ". ."-•• " "r".-. !.', s• .- • -.,. --t ..z.. ..- tfur rf urc....tme Vnuow•A• •r' C• ••J i 1 6'•a i RWGS, 4 .'..N.,..• ..:. • •...-L c - -. - •-••,. .4'.., •-?!..13Atoi.... • •"'"Y•'''" - Or 1r4.-- - •-• '-' )-111g4Nr:4' -‘.. •- ' . t - 1.1.i . -"""'''', '-'•'•.,4""C1-3,____.'!:-'1''...'".-)':-.::'---1,',A.'4i''.1-=-44';7":445;`..:•;411. 4ijaZ.'s;*. L.7:flr-- .7*-1:1::#Z4,-i.,-11.C%". .....W. .t.4s.:trir..'• ..,:... . - ,•,--4_ ,,,.•rom;....... ,- -•• •.—.. ---, --„ . ....., ,;.•-.. . -"';':".-va • ?""' .P' •*,"'1 - ,.C.34- • ''-•• • • ... q••••••'•• • ""e"., A..- ... ._.1-I0.t - ...1/,' 4....:41..-" :..,-•. J... :.Lr.rt!its,set:'....: "44.-,...r.....: .:,... ,r54-0 \IF. .--- .., . . ...Mr- -':.i.--5• .il-5 . .-s .!.. ': -. tu . ..... . ....." -------___________ --7-"'....1.1114grulP '':' •fir"----..- it( • __ ...,08 11•Ir.W — — Z . '",......... ,..---- . .... tV ."0................ LV . ..7. . . ! ...... 1 Z .ZE I . 2 I I I 1111ATI -- • r-r-- / / / / / . I (JAI.':-.Y," 55 0 C:.-VVE)':.:.1! 1 ' C) 0 L. L , . s SCALE)r.90. Z I . Cr) 11111EnliAll / 7:00.00 ''I jew.c/( I 1w, 4.1 ....1 I / ( - . \ \ OLOG .0.2 '‘. azi 40" 1 . . V\ " IMMIMMM.. 11M0.M..11 I I '\;,•..:\ .t s\\tr. ( RE \ \\NN 2 i `.3 .-11:3 .'N-....._, \ t nw 101.01 N..... a, lllt.00 i PI .. , rt ;I 1 \\J N`N.N.N\ .Co\r I 111.161111111111 ( '''.... N i N_ .!"• •. :. , inom. .... \ rya., % c,... •:- = 3 1 fp-,., AC CIM mlial. = kl.•s2.!=...- r.'...'•7:‘....E z: 1 IMIll I \ - . . i CO (=;) ....-, I IIIIII ., ti \ ..." CM CID = -KIE- . I \ . I = • I 0 CCI I I \ . • -, a 1-• _„ YeRly .w= C., (2:71 0. 8'RYE". (DRY SAN.SERER) C1.-iyai ' ' —•-• 1 -- etee ie• Ned .r 1 :) C12 CL, -trieur,g, ,..= ,),,,-; ..=-1 PLI co — . ._.. c.; CL, . ( ; Lbs./DEL/ELOPE., . . : I-- • it, pun= c„:2 iic. \\ . !II C.4 • JOS..0 6520 p ,t, zw• --- —,APRIL/205 •RJ \ wawa u ri A ---, gr-;•• •/./7777,,,,,,, / 4I, F • on...8 OUNN . • CwWW0 0 1 a ' ......1 r-,--4 / / .. .. ... . . ' ..... I 0, / / •SAFEWAY ,• • 7. . - • •I .I'' • • • . ' ' .. , . . . . •—• . •, . • .. . . ,`..,. ,t. . , 1 ;,-- I. .. 1 CITY .c -Off IT011 • tili " ; RFaCE \fED .. , I . 1, . li —4— 816 nil 2 19Jg0 .___ , i. , • , 11 (Id's. 1 i , N BUI' DIP:S/7.01%•!!t:0 DaPT. . 1. . .1. . , 1 [41.112 . . . „..... ,.? _ ,ei . , , A . _,.- __ ill--.. ' ---1-1 .,...t ....-- -4 it i es. . 7---,__EQ I 't.1 —..__. 11 1171 PIE .III I :0-4,I I I iilit . . 5 1 r ---_1--- '. .7-_-. G • _ b .. • , ..,, II---11 14. . .. rli_ _-_—_. . - .-.--_, • :•'• ft it ' ' il'-' . 11 Ix R. [I . ::. ,, • , ,„, ,,,.. .. ,. Il vi %I 1 .•• t_ g .„.... i . i• ii.. . . i 1 C. ::.:1 • . . ....---•711 lit II 11 ii. IKE I. . 4--- . I I III' Ill 1—' . .3.=. • • I . r-1- ..7. 1 01 , . , „. -- - a ,..• . . , ,.. , _ re , .... .,...„_ ==. ,- . . • , . c) ,i .,.. ,... I 1 riiti 1!Ili!'"Icli6111•11-ara aim.'I • ••.. 1 'a• .• M 2 ii r....). • 0 I. ',1' fil 4. _I 1 ,..:?... .. 7.: 1 -:..: • LI tg -41 A i . ..-:),.. ' I(5)‘ I 11'.- ii II _-• t i t...ie '' 7 I-1/4 .1 • ...--,,, __ ., 1 .. iim , p• :•'. .s. R i y ' ,,,. 11 I t'. - —— ‘1' •! I _, I , ‘-1. 1 . • i ,.., 1 ! I r• - I • . - . 0 ir , 1 •.... . , IM . • , ..,. 41 • 0 i ,, 1 ..-.. ,_ in, - .'• kg • • 3 . ® MO MI !I i 4, titd' e /i 3 14 .',.• .-\'7i P 11 ' -1ltin- - 16, .. , . , , I • ( r I ....,.., , 1 mi 1 <i! ,:II ' •i'' " '-._ ;:.i_ 5 4, 3 1 : 1 • li... T 1.:. . 1..... .......,,it A, I t . i z ......1 , • !I *. ri ' . . 1 ,. . .. --- -- • . • 11 . 14 iI • it- r '7:! ,.. i/ . 0 I ; • I i.::: 1 I r,. 1 •••._1 .mi. minciiii_ 11 r__-iLd-J&I-11 11 I • i ,:„.. I: # 1:, r---1-10- 1;11•7 1 co f. ' ...: )0 . • 4 I L.- amen. 1-1 . -., nix • . .. . ..„.:. ii ..'______ .,. • . LI I, . . . i.,. .. 1 . iiii . 1 1 il II ..,, 11 1-11 .1 i I . I il 1 1 • --•--ii 1`., i., . .J. , _ 4 i 11 .:q •• • 1 . I ..-7 r . 1 1 1 1 • I . r 4-- 4- 1 id '..7 111 11 i is ii I : 1 ' I 1 1 -th , li f: ' i 1 1 _1 .. i __.4-,. e ( ,, . . 4 L .1 • , ...1. - is= --11 t . • r I.421! ‘ . , , II 1 11 1 . 1 ' .='—• 1 •.— • , •i: 1 , . .: t . . . . 1 ,n 1 , 1.s.,_ • •14s. . J •1 ' — ' 1 !. MI Li NI 1 MI ,gi •.! ' . . - g I 11 1 I I 1 j ,, , -7 ... .()_c i — 1..— •.. _....,1-icANTE- r012\t„,cDT__...iri . .... .i. af I -ii!-Lto-i!lllll"1 . k-1 -9 12. .=iimmi u .---FEit 4-;io'bti— - I I .' ' Ph C.HILL.0.117.II.• : 1 • • •SOS Yr SST ,. ., ... •*.1,' ti 4 — 1'14 ow> IIILLLEVUIC,:::'••..•,:••• M. 'SODS:•• .. • 7, ..... ; ‘, xyile------- --1 1 k-, a) e- n g .....,....,r,.,..E. te.!...:::-..L.ittliz•vua-i'Witifia-iy Mk .1. wet_ (94,0)+Si-209i7. • . P°- •. , .: rr 2 n id. ' •cipi:Oal' ••t'onsizol; ot-ii-se . 4 . i , .... r : ", _o • r 4.'Nill Prie4 fKw�14 _._....__7. _, , gm., 1 Y ems,'ty WWI' �+.d a..q� �' *A'•a a •rJ-d ei -• l �t r ,Le r me!-; wiolM.F au�t]+h�' VIM of�•oLf4�p+uA+�1 Wi7fn°�G#n'fl' Cu�nl!•+CT O wiDfEF niDKt pILQIF{6( O ff.. stikEz-FAI' r sx • i• --,.. • 1_;. 1• . . 011 .sus Wait ' .t. -.:. .l: I ' " c"-e.rgrflume.-..ea,__ III; --1===! 7 7 1 1 = coN _ • ^ • • I I +� �t �4{r' r I I I � � vc+�f � f1 • ZI--; _ !,..,.:- 6 k---N.Q,; : •„:.- I 6. . , . .lortria.wawa- t• ,13,n ‘41 V P , 0' .. --k• •1'•• -e' ""�"� r----- ^ r `---� /4 ^�� •.enn.+a - _'�: a✓r'• —�•.1L, S,7 �J "1 -rtPu�t owe-(!I) cowrFt axc cr) -- Fw+vlur,f cs(t) - `'""'p 4 .4 � �4 m 0 PAM1K 4C' 3Pn _ - — — yd'-r-d _P� 0 r• 1-STF , ,. y rl<>.. tl r rr•r.ctr gi I r urrEP-M102f- it _....--------<>N1 - 174471. Y td ~ :--- - -u--- .rr ;� PAFwi ,®, ufr�T rAEI�IN6S IVO t7.-O ,,,,-�' - 6 �I i .m -_— --41:1"4 ' '='� ` bUIW11-or winit ' Coat.1 NOV.rncw•+k N•0 DHYE+y+Y - ' awIEG vcu� r+s4t++q rw Ou+Ta'^'f .rf Wa-�r'� p ... . . . .._ - . - - - a . . . •....„..........„............ . . PLANT SCHEDULE • ' C- rul7°I'l Crn 'r ` •,...C.......e.,..Poo Larmoo..-Pt•.....soon 1 . ott •" - -------- 11.-a =all c •2-T2.4"41=rhr",---' I 921111:11 Eaalro,joi•gt.aUALL '..,t ir-MEC,if •acit tti • ,, . .4. - • • ,,,,,ft•oi'.4 519I1 or F 1•.,za r _r -.., ri,..,: - "'ATOP: ,"*) .......•••-• •-•7•,._t-;•=v4.4; --:773'.1 , .,•_•,...,:m - • IPPIpaf.../..t h•CO9ICI (;)p.r.t::ocialualP la, 5 6 6 Inatome/3 ot , :non."...Gm. M — I Ya•c•I. I,I IL I r; n 101-18 • , 1 --...-,• ‘--•••.....04 WI PO. 1b. ) ral.2'..="ro•P7:"''...' II•• J U N 41 4' •.)3 . X.. ..‘' ,it . 1-"; :rail'70;0 I I c•Po„n9 pear 9•• 9 a if -^7::•1:2174.". t...._.i A-6. ••b 9 .....,9?OPT. DrIFIT• ,"7-"Nrr‘,..,...., . n.:.",2:::::.. ,,,,,••••^ ,,,-rOtIft 17:_.C...J1',...••••'''. ".. , .1••oca - , • . . 1.---6.9•1 tip rm., l' 1 e_....)Y.n•ft ••. II ....We c•Ill• ' Ett%- (:' Ptoo•............ 5Cotan pane 6 It• •a i 10,1 . ,--,,' ,-1^, ... 7.-.:too• 6 I t. "wrote y orate/ eW te:P7:1..1‘17......." ••• not an..... ii '..'..: 1.1,VII temp - . ii‘ .-.- i'-f7'. V.T.Y, 6 )-. . t.2) ran=c;77.• Ii!''24.00tt- P;:trs s.t. • • • y ir:rcoott .____ i l ,) CCL.V.I.71,-.... • ...5ttalg," • ,......,. -.Ago . .'&7..11' •' -."'2*Itanta.." 1; TA at•• oo, ------'----- .' = G • . .-- -------7-. ,! cow t ecus irce z. '?." 0 • .. - - 31 b , to. Inca.. . ci) 0 'tenon nvor•naoa pc. ott ... t.... 0 0 G Alibi..aol 3 Roe p.p. 6 pt.• SI 2 ; .4 . . 7-1...Lat. Sa•Ilcoc I I....I." ' E-4 ,/..41V orn./.,----• — 2.ow.",t•O•cal N.E.5th STREET , - G ".111..............' 1.?!1:- :`,.72- ________________-----.1- 7-, _ - - •':'• • :_l7.., 1! ii;ZIY e.r/ k •:• . - . -, •.---\ - _.2.--1-..,--- 3...411 • Oil Lit'.•j datt . Ifer .7 •1:-,: '' 3 • ~VI — . 1 / • A'mot• Plant 9 24.c.c. -• 0.111 ' • FFE 405 ..-----.,.....sonar.toroan..• *Ani FFE 397 c.a.,:C..'---) la I•nou••r cP•c•na orounaaPPIO• .1 \ a'Pot• Its•nt C 36•o c I ....,,,<-' '‘.... --. 1 5. j.•. ..,......,......z. An I cisc, ;,,:r...-,:,:n:- ,-.• 1.:7::,.:',.;-.,.:;;;.. - ik - 0 A --A, I pi - ' t 1,I.-k,, ' :.: 1 ..1,4i— 1- • CO . a.polo Plant i 24.o.c. er r. z . • ..16. I L.0) UJ - .• • — .... —' FFE 403 .s.. . . , ••...• ,,—, .•••-- , FFE 395 al . . • og •.. ...s lia;''' • 1- cu 1 ) .n..."-_-72,it,00r.co.caecintoo '-.--t. ,/St Jonnwport <flan 601.000cenp -ri-,v4%. ......10 ,,,_. ,, E 1'• ''''• CC 111 I © :7::'irc.:I at'''. !,?!1.... , ill • leatV, II og...r V.--__ gc I z • ED) :::7='. . Lr!.• ,,,-LI,.6,.‹."--- 11111" h ' ,..'s._.-- -.--- II • 1., ..5C _I .- i \ ---......Vtoe, ti -.... ..•:,,,ie 1.- a. '.i. ::' ! (i', f7::::=.;.1:::'`' - 4 • , 0. -., • ::....,•••!---,, ,----, .,." .•N 0'----.----' 5 ool• III Z , I . —V....i•-• LL -.. ..•le."‘ I....oteno Troop to remain V.I•./.----,N," 0 b -•*." ---- ,; ,. . 1 .___:-,-- — -- --1 • ..-.1-,,---, LI-1 co cm I CO 0 .1 < z - ' ',"'''-71 -71774' ' -•-••• „---,,-,7,7,) 4 .-t.ir 7...,'t'71-,1,--;.;' .al 'Imola' .1 mil•144m. 3 IV I- < tu _. ---•,.-•p‘refeJee Cot.foor.... ••• 1g aor -.'"---e_„, 1.1.1 0 •" " • . . . .. • ---,Ie.—Facece,oze ezZiretr..- ill - I. C • L .. . = - er) • 1401111 ,•"--TFE 395 6 di ID ,.. = g I iiigk FFE 397 uk FFE 397.2 ID FFE 398 I - - - - ellk___ s FFE 40.0 ideil. --- 1 2.0--a*•al.2 ..P-.6.1'..-'-'6{061, 1 re. showeisp.2m...01k , -,4a,.--'"`"21.:3610414 --',..,1••*--" :,... . 11/4 t ri SC . ! 006/111Beigi0.400 , . viii., irg 1 o • = , E I ..------- 1 • BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE - STAFF REPORT August 3 , 1988 A. BACKGROUND: . APPLICANT: Bennett Community Builders, Inc. PROJECT: Heritage Forest Apartments ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF;R;SA 018-88 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application to rezone approximately 1.22 acres of property from G-1, General Use, to . R-3 , Medium-Density, Multi-Family Residential and application for site plan approval to allow the development of a 28 • unit apartment complex on said property, to be called "Heritage Forest Apartments. " LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 4200 Block of N.E. 5th Street, on the south side of N.E. 5th Street and east of Union Avenue N.E. 2 N E' ‘7.,. sT ____ ______... 2 1 • •, :., . ... „,,, ,i :,. w B 9 I,o ., •,, is �m ., I L T. • ^, „, „ : .,...„, .216 :.. •1.,,,,1t.-..,-;..:;,.; ., , oo t. R- 1 72 • -, . ,. ,, • -} , I 1M iv ,. , ,b y i'1 III oG _J L _ • ...— 1...,-.— um 3 ,.. s i; I T. c � �i nhiF11iti e� + `' a�a teJ iv 1 ]rrili- ' ' G 1 • - I I . 2. _ I �;�'+,-* , F PUD• — IVI I— L R— w [ram Z J • . zJ� i_ • . I i 3 —. Q . . . , • H R-3P 87 I 12 1 R-3 . - . B_1 > 1 , I tl ,z • I 1j __ -i i I 1 7 I m 0 .{3 qiN ST I { S I I I N 7 z. ic' /jl 161— -.Li •. . I ; 0—I" LLL G-1 ---IR-3 • 1 i t ; • N 4 . : ... , R-3 G-� 1 - •• • , T I • r Bennett Community • Page 2 August 3, 1988 (ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES) 1. Topography - Site is characterized by rolling topography. Applicant states that maximum slope is 10%, and proposes to prepare the land for development and use by soil infill of approximately 1000 cubic yards on the western portion of the property, in combination with such other stabilizing devices as rockeries, planting dividers and open spaces. This proposal is intended to allow for retention of a majority of existing trees on the property. NOTE: The applicant indicates that a soils study is underway. This should be required to be certain that soil type and slope are suited for proposed development, and that proposed grade and fill operation is appropriate, and without significant potential for deleterious impacts on neighboring properties. A soils report submitted for Windsor Hills Apartments, immediately due east of the proposed project indicated that infilling could be adequately supported by the existing soils base) . If infill is permitted on this property, grade and fill should be subject to approval by the City. 2 . Existing habitat - Site presently hosts significant number of evergreen and deciduous trees. Songbirds have also been seen on site. No endangered species of flora or fauna are identified by applicant; Fisheries and Game confirms applicant findings. Applicant has submitted a plan which includes retention of seven (7) of the existing trees. This plan has been approved by the City's landscape planner, with the recommendation that all grade/fill activities be implemented in a manner which protects those trees. Other landscaping and open/space plans will be addressed later, in this report. 3 . Traffic impacts - 9 .2 per unit with proposed development (9. 2 x 28 units = 257) vs. 957 trips if the property were developed to the maximum permitted commercial density (assumes retail uses) . Only access to property is along N.E. 5th Street; if property were developed for commercial use those persons who must use the street to travel to and from their homes would be required to share the street with commercial users, causing a significant traffic increase and likely requiring upgrading of street improvements. Bennett Community' Page 3 August 3, 1988 4 . Storm drainage - The applicant has provided a detention/retention pond and grassy swales for storm drainage management on site. Site topography, site development and neighboring developments must be taken into account in planning a storm drainage system. The design and implementation of the drainage system should be subject to approval by the City. 5. Public service improvements - Adequate public services and improvements are available to accommodate the proposed development. However, the applicant may be required to take steps to ensure that the property is adequately served by those services/improvements, such as making a connection to the sanitary sewer system, submitting an approved water plan, and participating in systems development charges for area improvements. (See attached Utility Engineering comments for specific requirements. ) 6. Construction impacts - It is anticipated that there will be several impacts to the vicinity from construction activities, such as: construction noise and vehicular traffic; creation of dust and debris incidental to both grade and fill and building activity; and erosion. In order to mitigate noise impacts, operation should be restricted to hours between 7 a.m. and 5 p.m. (Note: EDMA has not been. checked -- so this is open for discussion. ) In order to mitigate against dust and debris, applicant should water down the site as necessary and wash truck wheels down before those vehicles leave the site. In order to mitigate against erosion, the applicant should be required to develop an erosion control plan subject to approval by the City' s landscape planner. Additionally it is suggested that the applicant be required to provide a bond in the amount of $1, 000 to ensure street clean-up during the construction period. 7. Noise, light & glare - The proposed residential development will be impacted by noise from commercial developments to the southwest and by potential commercial development to the south. It is suggested that existing features be augmented (e.g. brick fencing, building/unit orientation, extra insulation, air-conditioning) if necessary or an alternative site plan developed to mitigate against noise and other impacts associated with commercial development on the site to the south. 8. Displacement - The subject property presently has one single-family residence and attendant outbuildings. The structure Bennett Communit;" Page 4 August 3 , 1988 is not inhabited at present. It will need to be demolished to accommodate the proposed development. C. RECOMMENDATIONS: It is recommended that ERC issue a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated - for the proposed rezone and site. plan, with the following conditions: 1. That the applicant provide a design plan for open space, landscaping and screening which provides for retention of maximum open space/natural environment for habitat enhancement, for passive/active recreational opportunities for residents (adults and children) , and for screening of the property, subject to approval by the City. 2 . That the applicant limit construction operations to hours between 7 a.m. and 5 p.m. to mitigate noise impacts. 3 . That the applicant be required to periodically wet down the construction site with water to limit dust and debris. 4. That the applicant be required to wash down truck wheels with water prior to their leaving the site to minimize tracking of dirt onto the public right-of-way. 5. That' the applicant be required to provide a bond in the amount of $1, 000 to ensure street clean-up during construction operations. 6. That the applicant individually construct and/or participate in the construction of improvements to the site and the vicinity, as required by the City. 7. That the applicant considers an alternative site plan that orients some of the buildings to N.E. 5th thereby reinforcing the existing streetscape and placing parking at the rear of the site as a buffer between the units and commercial development to the south. Note: The applicant will provide a soils report which confirms the suitability of the site for the proposed infill and development, subject to approval by the City. D. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS: Various City departments have reviewed and commented upon the project. These comments are as follows: Police Department: Environmental: Traffic/noise related problems during construction. Addressing of complex crime prevention factors. (i.e. alarm systems, lighting, dead bolts) Bennett Communit! Page 5 August 3, 1988 Fire Prevention Bureau: Environmental: See comment sheet. Design Engineering: Environmental: Traffic Engineering: Environmental: Utility Engineering: Environmental: Needs approved utility plan. a Needs sanitary connection to south gravity line on N.E. 4th Street. Parks and Recreation Environmental: This project +has some attractive design features such as connecting sidewalks, benches, centrally located mail boxes, landscaping through the parking area and primarily passive open space. Open space expansion should be considered. How the benches and adjacent open space will function together should also be considered. { Building Division: Environmental: No comments. ! Zoning Division: Environmental: 1 1. All effort should be done to save existing Fir trees on site (illustrated on landscape plan) from damage due to grading and building construction on the site. 2 . Is on site recreation adequate? How is "open play area" to be utilized by children - should tot lot be provided? 3 . A picnic table within one of the lawn areas maylbe desirable for the tenants of the complex. Policy Department: Environmental: 1. Needs to evaluate BMP for drainage. _ Basin is **identified as "critical" by public works. On site detentionyretention should be evaluated. 2 . What habitat areas exist on site? Where are they?, 3 . Applicant1 should explore option of gas heating for units. 5. The proposal is not consistent with zoning or, Comprehensive Plan. Land use impacts should be addressed more thoroughly. 6. Transportation impacts need to be evaluated. 1 _4i cos CITY OF RENTON iaLL "It POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor September 13, 1988 Mr. Todd R. Bennett Bennett Community Builders, Inc.. 5729 Lakeview Drive Kirkland, WA 98033 • RE: Bennett Community Builders, Inc. Heritage Forest Apartments ECF-018-88, SA-018-88 Dear Mr. Bennett: A public hearing before the City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner has been scheduled for September 27 , 1988. The public hearing commences at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you before the hearing. If you have any questions, please call 235-2550. Sincerely, (D1,4)1( Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE:mjp cc: Leslie Donner Edwin and Linda Ferkingstad 12849 S.E. 72nd St. Renton, WA 98056 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2552 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON,WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUN- CIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RENTON, WASH- INGTON, ON SEPTEMBER 27, 1988, AT 9:00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOW- ING PETITIONS: Bennett Community Builders, Inc.- Heri- tage Forest Apartments Application to rezone approximately 1.22 acres of property from G-1,General Use,to R-3, Medium Density - Multi-Family Resi- dential; and application for site plan approval to allow the development of a 28 unit apartment ccm x on said property to ne called "Heritage Forest Apartments." Located in the 4200 block of N.E. 5th ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID Street, on the south side of N.E. 5th Street PETITIONS ARE INVITEC TO BE PRE- and east of Union Avenue N.E. ECF-018- SENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON 88,R-018-88,SA-018-88. SEPTEMBER 27, 1988, AT 9:00 A.M. TO Legal descriptions of the files noted EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. above are on file in the Renton Community Published: September 16, 1988 Valley Dai- Development Department. ly News R5106 Account#51067 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Audrey Benner ,being first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the VALLEY DAILY NEWS' --- • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition • Daily newspapers published six(6)times a week.That said newspapers are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published • in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King County,Washington.The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the;Superior Court of the State-of Washington for King County. The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the Kent Edition Renton Edition X , Auburn Edition , (and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period.The annexed notice a Notice of Public Hearing was published on $eptember 16 , 1988 R5106 • The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the ; , • sum of $ 21 .28 " Subscribed and sworn to before me his 2 2 ndday of Sept 1988 988 Notary ublic for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, King County, Washington. VDN#87 Revised 11/86 • • o °'I 9TFD SEPZEo ,.I� .{ ::p.. . ,. City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner will hold a '.y 1 ,I HEARING „. .:.:: : , .:;,, , , , ,,:„ , ,,, . . , . ;; CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL ' '-,'f ON SEPTEMBER 27, 1988 BEGINNING AT 9:00A.M. ' P.M. ' CONCERNING: ECF-018-88, R-018-88, SA-018-88 BENNETT COMMUNITY BUILDERS, INC. - HERITAGE FOREST APARTMENTS . ' Application to rezone approximately 1.22 acres of property from G-1, General Use, to R-3, Medium Density - Multi-Family Residential; and application for site plan approval to allow the ;';1 development of a 28 unit apartment complex on said property to be _ _._ ca 1 d H r ForestApartment".__ _' - - -- a 1 e 11 a it -w� ■ T ' - -; . s•I.•. r .1,r1�o .' Ili _i& •• ! s' 7l•'.4l�� K~ z I . i. ,r �• � ne_n"OM'nor .. I. 1 •�y •, e'. R-1 r R-2 • N E. , V� L N '' i . .1 ' I.w .'11,�.'I.ry�.r� ;Vl�/i� l�-O �),•. _•�_Z N •'�1. IJ_��i� 1,- �._ - __ --.- ^Q N E 1 I cN',. L;: PL ,9 ii o. •'q':-, f ,�,',�'--,II' l I�I• `� ,.. •, N 1 • �JF '�� 4 -I- 1 :' 99 111 1 ' :L. - - G�- i -1 G-�11 - R_2 . . , r _ ., ii.:;. Fpup_azwilbetn .„ , tree„..4g T.i . Sy . 1' rif •' . 7' ,r ._.. 1I . LL ss t`'del . Sl { s 1-_ 1 P—I, ' .r' . •Co • I I GEI�rE AAI Lo A' �QN AN OFERTY LZSCA'P� N THE 4 0 BLO TC ;c' T D/OFt ADD Eg'• I 2 0 C OF N.E. 5TH STREET, ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF N.E. 5TH STREET AND EAST OF UNION AVENUE N.E. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON ' -` `'''' BUILDING&ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-25,50 -, : --THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT._ ___. _ _ PROPER AUTHORIZATION ' ' ^^\\ • , CERTIFICATION = I UNhl fi-LIYJD HEREBY ,CERTIFY THAT DIVE (S ) COPIES OF • THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN 1'IVI5 (5 ) . CONSPICUOUS . PLACES ON OR NEARBY THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY ON .57• 14 - 19bb • . • ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington _ residing in r- ",/,, -o day of , on the f�aSIGNED : t NOt adleaRtc41,6- • µOF R `1• :. E • ;. :. ( ° ) i � . ' F0 SEPI ".?) • City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner . • will hold a puBLIC , HEARING ., . . . . in • CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL • • ON SEPTEMBER 27, 1988 .BEGINNING AT 9: OoA.M. P.M. CONCERNING: ECF-018-88, R-018-88, SA-018-88 BENNETT COMMUNITY BUILDERS, INC. - HERITAGE FOREST APARTMENTS Application to rezone approximately 1. 22 acres of property from G-1, General Use, to R-3, Medium Density - Multi-Family Residential; and application for site plan approval to allow the development of a 28 unit apartment complex on said property to be _ __._.-_.____,__ called "Heritage Forest Apartment" . = 4 I .11 . • ,13 1.4cry,itri ,Y?r' : . l, ,14'l,�_ 1-( ----4T I b lSlt.1%lin..as 1•. 'S - � 1::�'_• n _ •1 R-1 p----7-2--i------7 _ - I WE. n ... _, ��� \. 1 e = ThfflI E • . . A N E ei b'r ( 'P. I•' ''�, nT-O •i_J „I_a i. :it ` .. - - ` _ i R_1 IFT,F,TUFLI t� r I". IN 1 . - • - ..' .'. .- . G 1111.. • I � • i ', h i l 11 ' • 7 , . . B Vollita ' 1,..e•::13-1CI :. I `�( , i,c, TA Y� ST 5 .‘• i G 1lIE , , ,,-. �c 1 ,T, N TAN•D/OR ADS Eg' 8I DFEKTY LZPIR 1N 4200 BLOCK OF N.E. 5TH STREET, ON THE • • SOUTH SIDE OF N.E. 5TH STREET AND EAST OF UNION AVENUE N.E. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY .OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 • • THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE . REMOVED, WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION ' ' NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON SEPTEMBER 27, 1988, AT 9: 00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: BENNETT COMMUNITY BUILDERS, INC.- HERITAGE FOREST APARTMENTS Application to rezone approximately 1.22 acres of property from G-1, General Use, to R-3, Medium Density - Multi-Family Residential; and application for site plan approval to allow the development of a 28 unit apartment complex on said property to be called "Heritage Forest Apartments. " Located in the 4200 block of N.E. 5th Street, on the south side of N.E. 5th Street and east of Union Avenue N.E. ECF-018-88, R-018-88, SA-018-88. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Community Development Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON SEPTEMBER 27, 1988, AT 9: 00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. Published: September 16, 1988 á?16 1 Nikki N. Nisco �•- - 4200 N.E. 5th St. Renton, Washington 98056 ' Iw ' 09-12-88 _ ATTENTION: BUILDING AND ZONING ADMINISTRATION REFERENCE: THE BENNETT DEVELOPERS - HERITAGE DEVELOPMENT''. This letter is to express my concerns for the increased building in my neighbor- hood. I bought my home five (05) years ago and did so because of two promises by the ' builder: 1 ) a small park was to be built across the street from me and the new road was stated to be a cul-de-sac. Recently a new builder has built some 350 plus apartments to the east of my home and now the City wants to allow another developer to build more to the south of my home. The trees to the east were all removed for these apartments and the dust from the area at times was/is unbearable. The traffic from just the construction workers has made the street an unsafe area to attempt to cross let alone allow my children to ride their bicycles. N.E. 5th street has turned into a:;heavily traveled street. My concerns are about the new heavy:°volumn of traffic and allowing another developer to strip the remaining treed area out. I am aware the City can change its' cul-de-sac promise to the builder but 'I pray the City is big enough to "BEND", to allow some nature to remain as it has in other parts of residental areas. • I am proposing the original promised park be built. A small park with trees boarder- ing it similar to the parks Glenco has as well as the one near Graham Street. I would like to see the through street barred off as was done on Grant Street when the Woodcliff Apartments went in and again on the west side of the Crown Point as it borders the trailer park. I am all for progression for `"' our City but not at the expense of nature and peace of mind. Thank you, I I NAN N SCO _ . liT ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION APPLICATION NO. ECF-018-88 , SA-018-88, R-18-88 APPLICANT BENNETT COMMUNITY BUILDERS, INC. • PROPOSED ACTION APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROX. 1.22 A. FROM G-1 TO R-3 & APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR DEVELOPMENT OF 28 UNIT APARTMENT COMPLEX TO BE CALLED HERITAGE FOREST APARTMENTS. GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS LOCATED IN THE 4200 BLOCK OF N.E. 5TH ST. ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF N.E. 5TH ST. AND EAST OF UNION AVENUE N.E. POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (E.R.C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES I>< DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY . AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., SFPTFMRR. -12 , 1988 • FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION AT 2 3 5-2 5 5 0. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION. • • lk • • 1.'75'. .?'eth?{'M' •f carer? 1 �� f , :.1 ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION APPLICATION NO. ECF-018-88, SA-018-88, R-18-88 APPLICANT BENNETT COMMUNITY BUILDERS, INC. PROPOSED ACTION ,' ' APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROX. 1.22 A. FROM G-1 TO R-3 & APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR DEVELOPMENT OF 28 UNIT APARTMENT COMPLEX TO BE CALLED HERITAGE FOREST APARTMENTS. GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS • '''1; LOCATED IN THE 4200 BLOCK OF N.E. 5TH ST. ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF • N.E. 5TH ST. AND EAST OF UNION AVENUE N.E. POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE. (E.R.C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES I>< DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL (XI WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY .•. BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., gr IDTPTurR_3 19 O , FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION. I , 3VM -,LIN)0 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT' - (3 ) COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE'..POS-TED -BY. -ME-I-N---f_ ,` CONSPICUOUS : PLACES ON OR NEARBY THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY ON YNU,40(.-bl#M) lots2 ATTEST: Subscribed end sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington • residing in TO at) , on theme' OTA ,SIGNED : LA ` -- -(Ai day of * tu 6, , NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION Environmental Review Committee Renton, Washington The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitgated for the following project(s) under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. The Applicant(s) have completed a mitigation process: BENNETT COMMUNITY BUILDERS, INC. HERITAGE FOREST APARTMENTS Application to rezone approximately 1.22 acres of property from G-1, General Use, to R-3 , Medium Density - Multi-Family Residential ; and application for site plan approval to allow the development of a 28 unit apartment complex on said property- to be called "Heritage Forest Apartments. " Located in the 4200 block of N.E. 5th Street, on the south side of N.E. 5th Street and east of Union Avenue N.E. ECF-018- 88, R-018-88, SA-018-88 . I-405 CITY OF RENTON Application to construct storm drain improvements to increase drainage capacity at the I-405 culvert near N.E. 44th Street. Property located north of I-405 at N.E. 4th Street. ECF-031-88 . Further information regarding this action . is available in the Community Development Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. This Determination is FINAL. There is a 14 day appeal period which will end at 5: 00 p.m. on September 12 , 1988. Any appeal of this decision may be made to the City's Hearing Examiner, Municipal Building, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, Washington. An appeal must state clearly, in writing, why the Determination should be revised and must be accompanied by a non-refundable $75. 00 filing fee. Published: August 29, 1988 6 51067 r' ? -AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION A ud rR y Benner ,being first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the VALLEY DAILY NEWS • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week.That said newspapers are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King County,Washington.The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the Kent Edition , Renton Edition x , Auburn Edition , (and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed'to_its subscribers during the below stated period.The annexed notice-T. Public Notice was published on Augnst 29 , 1988 R5096 • The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $ 30 .40 • Subscribed and sworn to before me this 12 t h day of Sept 19 A 8 Notar blic for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, King County, Washington. VDN#87 Revised 11/86 Public Notice completed a mitigation process: BENNETT COMMUNITY BUILDERS, INC.-HERITAGE FOREST APARTMENTS Application to rezone approximately 1.22 acres of property from G-1,General Use,to R-3, Medium Density - Multi-Family Resi- dential; and application for site plan approval to allow the development of a 28 unit apartment complex an said property to be called "Heritage Forest Apartments." Located in the 4200 block of N.E. 5th Street, on the south side of N.E. 5th Street and east of Union Avenue N.E. ECF-018- 88,R-018-88,SA-018-88. 1-405 CITY OF RENTON Application to construct storm drain improvements to increase drainage capaci- ty at the 1-405 culvert near N.E.44th Street. Property located north of 1-405 at N.E. 4th Street.ECF-031-88. Further information regarding this action is available in the Community Development Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550:This Determination is FINAL. There is a 14 day appeal period which will end at 5:00 p.m. on September NOTICL OF ENVIRONMENTAL 12, 1988. Any appeal of this decision may DETERMINATION be made to the City's Hearing Examiner, Environmental Review Committee Municipal Building, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton,Washington Renton, Washington. An appeal must state The Environmental Review Committee clearly, in writing, why the Determination (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non- should be revised and must be accompa- Significance-Mitgated for the following pro- nied by a non-refundable$75.00 filing fee. ject(s) under the authority of the Renton Published:August 29, 1988 Valley Daily Municipal Code. The Applicant(s) have News R5096 Account#51067 Co' CITY OF RENTON fINP5 POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor August 29, 1988 Edwin and Linda Ferkingstad 12849 S.E. 77nd St. Renton, WA 98056 RE: Heritage Forest Apartments File Nos. ECF-018-88, R-018-88, SA-018-88 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Ferkingstad: This letter is to inform you that the comment period has ended for the Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated for the above referenced project. No comments were received. Pursuant to its statutory authority the City's Environmental Review Committee has issued the following mitigating measure for the above referenced project: 1. That the applicant develop a design plan for open space, landscaping and screening which maximizes open space/natural environment for both habitat enhancement, for and passive/active recreational opportunities for residents (adults and children). Note: The Committee felt the applicant should consider an alternative site plan that orients some of the buildings to N.E. 5th thereby reinforcing the existing streetscape and placing parking at the rear of the site as a buffer between the units and commercial development to the south. 2. That the applicant limit construction operations to hours between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. on Saturdays and that no construction operations occur on Sunday to mitigate noise impacts. 3. That the applicant be required to periodically wet down the construction site with water to limit dust and debris. 4. That the applicant be required to wash down truck wheels with water prior to their leaving the site to minimize tracking of dirt onto the public right-of-way. 5. That the applicant be required to provide a bond in the amount of $1,000 to ensure street clean-up during construction operations. In addition, the applicant is advised to provide a soils report which confirms the suitability of the site for the proposed infill and development, subject to approval by the City. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2552 Y i Edwin and Linda Ferkingstad Appeal Period Notification • August 29, 1988 Page Two The Committee's determination is final and may be appealed to the City's Hearing Examiner no later than 5:00 p.m. on September 12, 1988. Any appeal must state clearly why the determination should be revised and must be accompanied by a non-refundable $75.00 filing fee. If you have questions or desire clarification of the above, please call our office at 235- 2550. For the Enviro a tal evie Committee, 40 onald K. Ericks n, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE/adk t$ CITY OF RENTON POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor • August 29, 1988 Leslie Donner 12849 S.E. 77nd St. Renton, WA 98056 RE: Heritage Forest Apartments File Nos. ECF-018-88, R-018-88, SA-018-88 Dear Lesie Donner: This letter is to inform you that the comment period has ended for the Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated for the above referenced project. No comments were received. Pursuant to its statutory authority the City's Environmental Review Committee has issued the following mitigating measure for the above referenced project: 1. That the applicant develop a design plan for open space, landscaping and screening which maximizes open space/natural environment for both habitat enhancement, for and passive/active recreational opportunities for residents (adults and children). Note: The Committee felt the applicant should consider an alternative site plan that orients some of the buildings to N.E. 5th thereby reinforcing the existing streetscape and placing parking at the rear of the site as a buffer between the units and commercial development to the south. 2. That the applicant limit construction operations to hours between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. on Saturdays and that no construction operations occur on Sunday to mitigate noise impacts. 3. That the applicant be required to periodically wet down the construction site with water to limit dust and debris. 4. That the applicant be required to wash down truck wheels with water prior to their leaving the site to minimize tracking of dirt onto the public right-of-way. 5. That the applicant be required to provide a bond in the amount of $1,000 to ensure street clean-up during construction operations. In addition, the applicant is advised to provide a soils report which confirms the suitability of the site for the proposed infill and development, subject to approval by the City. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2552 • Leslie Donner Appeal Period Notification • August 29, 1988 Page Two The Committee's determination is final and may be appealed to the City's Hearing Examiner no later than 5:00 p.m. on September 12, 1988. Any appeal must state clearly why the determination should be revised and must be accompanied by a non-refundable $75.00 filing fee. If you have questions or desire clarification of the above, please call our office at 235- 2550. ironme a Revie C ittee, r Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE/adk ,N�.a CITY OF RENTON ' " POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor August 29, 1988 Mr. Todd R. Bennett 5720 Lakeview Drive Kirkland, WA 98033 RE: Heritage Forest Apartments File Nos. ECF-018-88, R-018-88, SA-018-88 Dear Mr. Bennett: This letter is to inform you that the comment period has ended for the Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated for the above referenced project. No comments were received. Pursuant to its statutory authority the City's Environmental Review Committee has issued the following mitigating measure for the above referenced project: 1. That the applicant develop a design plan for open space, landscaping and screening which maximizes open space/natural environment for both habitat enhancement, for and passive/active recreational opportunities for residents (adults and children). Note: The Committee felt the applicant should consider an alternative site plan that orients some of the buildings to N.E. 5th thereby reinforcing the existing streetscape and placing parking at the rear of the site as a buffer between the units and commercial development to the south. 2. That the applicant limit construction operations to hours between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. on Saturdays and that no construction operations occur on Sunday to mitigate noise impacts. 3. That the applicant be required to periodically wet down the construction site with water to limit dust and debris. 4. That the applicant be required to wash down truck wheels with water prior to their leaving the site to minimize tracking of dirt onto the public right-of-way. 5. That the applicant be required to provide a bond in the amount of $1,000 to ensure street clean-up during construction operations. In addition, the applicant is advised to provide a soils report which confirms the suitability of the site for the proposed infill and development, subject to approval by the City. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2552 Mr. Bennett Appeal Period Notification August 29, 1988 Page Two The Committee's determination is final and may be appealed to the City's Hearing Examiner no later than 5:00 p.m. on September 12, 1988. Any appeal must state clearly why the determination should be revised and must be accompanied by a non-refundable $75.00 filing fee. If you have questions or desire clarification of the above, please call our office at 235- 2550. For t • q viron a Rev' w Co m tee, Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE/adk . } / ./ —� ` r POLJ( L.:.'a;:.,, !71": iiiiilLly CITY OF RENTON T J , AUG221988 ip. , , ,.. m 'S n %, s- " ,I i August 19, 1988 �, L� �;�'�+ i''''' i' Building and Zoning Department City of Renton, WA City Hall 200 Mill Street South Renton, WA 98057 Subj : Applications-ECF-018-88, SA-018-88 Dear Sirs : I have been asked by fellow members of the Union 600 Association, owners of 18 duplex condominiums on the north side of N.E. 5th Avenue in the 4100 and 4200 blocks to contact you on the above applications. Our group strongly objects to the proposed zoning change for Bennett Community Builders and Heritage Forest Apartments. There are now our 18 units and 16 units on the south side of N. E. 5th. This street will be the entry for a very large complex which will soon be completed and inhabited in the two blocks east of our residences. An additional 28 units will further congest a road that was built for a small percentage of its projected use. • We urge people from your department to visit our neighborhood and see what a great negative impact another new project would inflict upon us. Can we expect a hearing where we can be represented? Sincerely, 0 mes P. Reilly 4122 N. E. 5th Renton, WA 98056 J.P. Reilly 4122 N.E. 5th Renton, WA 98056 nc !" !:'~ li 3 1 _Yi Building & Zoning Department City of Renton, WA City Hall 200 Mill Street so_ Renton, WA 98057 16;)1- 71-1 tfdD9lri'Y Building and Zoning Department August 18, 1988 City of Renton - City Hall 200 Mill Street South Renton, WA 98057 AUG � 2 1988 Re: Building and zoning applications ECF-018-88, SA-018-88 Dear Sirs: As President of the Union 550 Condominium Association it is my duty to inform you of the situation involving N.E. 5th Street, directly east of Union Avenue. N.E. 5th Street was, until 4 months ago, a dead-end street less than 2 blocks long. It was put in to accommodate 34 condominium units, and the width of the street dictates the traffic flow. It is barely wide enough for 2 cars to pass wan side parking is utilized. Recently N.E. 5th Street was punched through to accommodate 400 plus apartment units. The traffic flow has increased enough just from the construction workers, that it has turned this dead-end street into a mini-freeway. I have been informed by the Renton Police Department to expect 800 times the traffic once the units are filled with rentors. The posted applications indicate another 28 units are to be constructed between our condominiums and the 400 unit complex with access to be off of N.E. 5th Street. This would be lunacy. Not only should this project be scratched, but once this 400 apartment project construction is finished, the street should again be closed off to provide access for the original 34 units it was designed for. We have children and animals in our condominiums. As the situation currently exists, it is now a matter of time before a tragic accident will happen. It would be my suggestion that your department physically visit our neighborhood for review and picture yourselves as a homeowner. You may wish to invite the Chief of the Renton Police Department to question how they could possibly control the traffic flow. You may also wish to invite the Chief of the Fire Department for review of how they could possibly respond to emergency situations in our area. I also suggest that you consider the 4 lane highway of N.E. 4th Street for access of all future construction and the resulting population thereof. We are crowded and it is dangerous. Please don' t allow the situation to intensify. We wait for your response. Sincerely, ames A. Goerg resident PO Box 531 , Renton, WA 98057-0531 Day: 271-3353 Night: 228-0599 CC: Mayor-Earl Clymer Councilwoman - Toni Nelson Union 550 Homeowners Union 600 Homeowners • • CEO 6m - NE RENTOP71001d3Fii1V aMETR0 y Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle Exchange Building • 821 Second Ave. • Seattle,WA 98104-1598 August 17, 1988 POLICY DEVELOr?,I,ENT DEri-RiMci,, CITY OF RE\! ON i) AUC 2 2 1988 rE ü ( fli Donald Erickson, Zoning Administration Environmental Review Committee Building & Zoning Department 200 Mill Avenue S. Renton, Washington 98055 Determination of Non-Significance File No. : ECF-018-88 Bennett Community Builders Dear Mr. Erickson: Metro staff has reviewed this proposal and anticipates no significant impacts to its wastewater facilities. Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment. Sincerely, Gregory M. Bush, Manager Environmental Planning Division GMB:wsg • -.),10( Guido cmvoiPacN oc\lotC O id k -v*i qpi r).ca isso (wid or)(AlfOi 'dam` c\ olssCY)cl(73 SINONIA103 ii 1/ No k-Ah1 NocK 07(\10(14 -7c1-..(''‘.- ot '‘ OD I-1 S-'gli";c1 / '-1/7( (-frO atqld _Pr'r�acjff _11,Carlay QQ©f DNIGNaliDd-arsacce MOM NOLINZINVD110 do arum QNK arum (ems) , c7 2 Gums) � , I :sus /QVUEICEIWON =aid q q b 1 '1 )Q\ _aaIo0 30 LKa . Os/ t..caU0 )9 y =au amq modal Z xNEER1\100 } de )�.41. 4 G ENviR NmENTAL DECLARATIO APPLICATION NO. ECF-018-88, SA-018-88 , R-018-88 APPLICANT BENNETT COMMUNITY BUILDERS — HERITAGE FOREST APARTMENTS PROPOSED ACTION APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROX. 1. 22 ACRES FROM G-1, GENERAL. USE TO R-3 , MEDIUM DENSITY, MULTI—FAMILY; APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW DEVELOPMENT OF 28 UNIT APARTMENT COMPLEX TO BE CALLED HERITAGE FOREST APARTMENTS . GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF N.E. 5TH ST. , EAST OF UNION AVE.N.E. POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (E.R.C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES KDOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL XWILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY AUGIUST 21 , 1 c)R8. AM A DDC A I AC TLIC Ariew ate. t w..w.• CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO. : ECF-018-88 APPLICATION NO(S) : R-018-88, SA-018-88 PROPONENT: Bennett Community Builders DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application to rezone approximately 1. 22 acres of property from G-1, General Use, to R-3 , Medium Density - Multi-Family Residential; and application for site plan approval to allow the development of a 28 unit apartment complex on said property to be called "Heritage Forest Apartments" . LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 4200 Block of N.E. 5th Street, on the south side of N.E. 5th Street and east of Union Avenue N.E. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Building and Zoning Department The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probably significant adverse impact on the environmental. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43 . 21C. 030 (2) (c) . Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental ReviewCommittee under their authority of Section 4-2822 (D) Renton Municipal Code (see attached sheet) . These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340 (2) . Because mitigation measures were applied, the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fifteen (15) days from August 8, 1988 . Any interested party may submit written comments which must be submitted by 5: 00 p.m. , August 23 , 1988, in order to be considered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period will commence following the finalization of the DNS. Responsible Official; - Environmental Review Committee c/o Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator Planning Division Community Development Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 PUBLICATION DATE: August 8 , 1988 DATE OF DECISION: August 3 , 1988 SIGNATURES: Rona d G. Nelson Larry Springer Building Official Planning Manager `4,e Richard C. oughton Public Wo s Director DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED MITIGATION MEASURES PROJECT: Bennett Community Builders Heritage Forest Apartments ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF-018-88, APPLICATION NUMBER: R-018-88, SA-018-88 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application to rezone approximately 1.22 acres of property from G-1, General Use, to R-3, Medium Density - Multi-Family Residential; and application for site plan approval to allow the development of a 28 unit apartment complex on said property to, be called "Heritage Forest Apartments: " LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Located in the 4200 block of N.E. 5th Street, on the south side of N.E. 5th Street and east of Union Avenue N.E. DETERMINATION: The ERC issued a Determination of Non-Significance- Mitigated - for the proposed rezone and site plan on August 3 , 1988, with the following conditions: 1. That the applicant develop a design plan for open space, landscaping and screening which maximizes open space/natural environment for both habitat enhancement and passive/active recreational opportunities for residents (adults and children) . Note: The Committee felt the applicant should consider an alternative site plan that orients some of the buildings to N.E. 5th thereby reinforcing the existing streetscape and placing parking at the rear of the site as a buffer between the units and commercial development to the south. 2 . That the applicant limit construction operations to hours between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. on Saturdays and that no construction operations occur on Sundays to mitigate noise impacts. 3 . That the applicant be required to periodically wet down the construction site with water to limit dust and debris. 4 . That the applicant be required to wash down truck wheels with water prior to their leaving the site to minimize tracking of dirt onto the public right-of-way. 5. That the applicant be required to provide a bond in the amount of $1, 000 to ensure street clean-up during construction operations. OTHER: In addition, the applicant is advised to provide a soils report which confirms the suitability of the site for the proposed infill and development, subject to approval by the City. - 1 NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated for the following project(s) under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. The Applicants(s) have completed a mitigation process pursuant to WAC 197-11-350. Bennett Community Builders, Inc.- Heritage Forest Apartments Application to rezone approximately 1. 22 acres, of property from G-1, General Use, to R-3 , Medium Density - Multi-Family Residential; and application for site plan approval to allow the development of a 28 unit apartment complex on said property to be called "Heritage Forest Apartments. " Located in the 4200 block of N.E. 5th Street, on the south side of N.E. 5th Street and east of Union Avenue N.E. ECF-018- 88, R-018-88, SA-018-88 . I-405 City of Renton Application to construct storm drain improvements to increase drainage capacity at the I-405 culvert near N.E. 44th Street. Property located north of I-405 at N.E. 4th Street. ECF-031-88 . Leady Short Plat & Sunset Mini-Storage Application for Short Plat approval to subdivide approximately 3 .71 acres of commercially zoned property into two (2) lots and application for Conditional Use permit to allow a mini-storage warehouse facility on Lot 1 and application for Site Plan approval as required by restrictive covenant for said development on the subject site. Located on the north side of N.E. Sunset Boulevard at the 4400 block. ECF-052-88, ShPl-052-88, CU-052-88, SA-052-88. These decisions will be finalized in 15 days. Written comments received after 5: 00 p.m. , August 23, 1988 will not be considered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period will commence following the finalization of DNS-M. The mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Building and Zoning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington. Phone: 235-2550. Published: August 8, 1988 3 ' y V . 40. CITY OF RENTON MAL POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor August 8, 1988 Todd R. Bennett Bennett Community Builders 5279 Lakeview Drive Kirkland, WA 98033 Re: Bennett Community Builders/Heritage Forest Apartments ECF-018-88, R-018-88 Dear Mr. Bennett: This letter is to inform you that the Environmental Review Committee completed their review of the environmental impacts of the above referenced project. The Committee on August 3, 1988 decided that your project may be issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with the following conditions: 1. That the applicant develop a design plan for open space, landscaping and screening which maximizes open space/natural environment for both habitat enhancement, for and passive/active recreational opportunities for residents (adults and children). Note: The Committee felt the applicant should consider an alternative site plan that orients some of the buildings to N.E. 5th thereby reinforcing the existing streetscape and placing parking at the rear of the site as a buffer between the units and commercial development to the south. 2. That the applicant limit construction operations to hours between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. on Saturdays and that no construction operations occur on Sunday to mitigate noise impacts. 3. That the applicant be required to periodically wet down the construction site with water to limit dust and debris. 4. That the applicant be required to wash down truck wheels with water prior to their leaving the site to minimize tracking of dirt onto the public right-of-way. 5. That the applicant be required to provide a bond in the amount of $1,000 to ensure street clean-up during construction operations. In addition, the applicant is advised to provide a soils report which confirms the suitability of the site for the proposed infill and development, subject to approval by the City. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2552 4 � Mr. Todd R. Bennett August 4, 1988 Page Two Because the Environmental Review Committee imposed specific mitigation measures rather than issue a Determination of Significance, there is a required fifteen (15) day comment period during which comments are solicited from various agencies, jurisdictions or individuals who may have an interest in the Committee's decision. The comment period will end August 23, 1988. Following the end of the comment period, the City will finalize it's Determination unless comments received require a reevaluation. Following the finalization of the Determination, there is a required fourteen (14) day appeal period. In addition, by the end of the comment period, we should be able to establish a tentative public hearing date before the Hearing Examiner. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call our office at 235-2550 and ask for Jeanette Samek-McKague or me. Fo e Environm ntal Review Committee, Dona d K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE:sr 4 , . CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director August 8, 1988 Leslie Donner 12849 S. E. 72nd Street Renton, WA 98055 Re: Bennett Community Builders/Heritage Forest Apartments ECF-018-88, R-018-88 Dear Mr. Donner: This letter is to inform you that the Environmental Review Committee completed their review of the environmental impacts of the above referenced project. The Committee on August 3, 1988 decided that your project may be issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with the following conditions: 1. That the applicant develop a design plan for open space, landscaping and screening which maximizes open space/natural environment for both habitat enhancement, for and passive/active recreational opportunities for residents (adults and children). Note: The Committee felt the applicant should consider an alternative site plan that orients some of the buildings to N.E. 5th thereby reinforcing the existing streetscape and placing parking at the rear of the site as a buffer between the units and commercial development to the south. 2. That the applicant limit construction operations to hours between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. on Saturdays and that no construction operations occur on Sunday to mitigate noise impacts. 3. That the applicant be required to periodically wet down the construction site with water to limit dust and debris. 4. That the applicant be required to wash down truck wheels with water prior to their leaving the site to minimize tracking of dirt onto the public right-of-way. 5. That the applicant be required to provide a bond in the amount of $1,000 to ensure street clean-up during construction operations. In addition, the applicant is advised to provide a soils report which confirms the suitability of the site for the proposed infill and development, subject to approval by the City. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206). 235-2540 Leslie Donner August 4, 1988 Page Two Because the Environmental Review Committee imposed specific mitigation measures rather than issue a Determination of Significance, there is a required fifteen (15) day comment period during which comments are solicited from various agencies, jurisdictions or individuals who may have an interest in the Committee's decision. The comment period will end August 23, 1988. Following the end of the comment period, the City will finalize it's Determination unless comments received require a reevaluation. Following the finalization of the Determination, there is a required fourteen (14) day appeal period. In addition, by the end of the comment period, we should be able to establish a tentative public hearing date before the Hearing Examiner. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call our office at 235-2550 and ask for Jeanette Samek-McKague or me. e viron tal R ie ommittee, Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE:adk cc: Edwin and Line Ferkinstad 111 City of Renton Environmental Review Committee MEETING NOTICE DATE: August 2, 1988 To: Larry Springer Mike Parness Don Erikson Dick Houghton Ron Nelson Ray Caldwell Glen Gordon From: Don Erickson's Secretary Meeting Date: Wednesday, August 3 , 1988 Time: 10: 00 a.m. Location: Third Floor Conference Room Agenda is attached below. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE. AGENDA August 3, 1988 Third Floor Conference Room Commencing at 10: 00 a.m. CONTINUED PROJECTS City of Renton Reservoir Application to: a) rezone approximately two acres of property from R-1 (Residential Use) and Greenbelt to P-i (Public Use) ; b) construct a reservoir (1 million gallon tank) and a 16 inch water service pipeline. ECF 021-88; R 021-88; SA 021-88. • NEW PROJECTS (I-405) City of Renton Application to: a) rezone approximately two acres of property from R-1 (Residential Use) and Greenbelt to P-i (Public Use) ; b) construct a reservoir (1 million gallon tank) and a 16 inch water service pipeline. ECF 021-88; R 021-88; SA 021-88 Beadex Mfg Application to construct a one-story 8500 square foot metal warehouse to serve as an addition to an existing one- story concrete building of approximately 32, 000 square feet. The proposed structure will displace 20 parking places which are to be relocated on the site. ECF 032-88 May Creek Erosion Management Project Hillside drainage protection/erosion control project established in the May Creek Plan. Proposed as a new 18" storm main from Kennewick Avenue N. E. . ECF 039-88, SM-039-88. Bennett Community Builders, Inc. Heritage Forest Apartments Application to rezone approximately 1.22 acres of property from G-1, General Use, to R-3, Medium-Density, Multi-Family Residential and application for site plan approval to allow the development of a 28 unit apartment complex on said property, to be called "Heritage Forest Apartments. " ECF;R;SA 018-88. Leady Short Plat & Sunset Mini-Storage Application for Short Plat approval to subdivide approximately 3.71 acres of commercially zoned property into two (2) lots and application for Conditional Use permit to allow a mini-storage warehouse facility on Lot #1 and application for Site Plan approval as required by restrictive covenant for said development on the subject site. ECF-052-88; SH-PL- 052-88; CU-052-88; SA-052-88. TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE . AGENDA July 27, 1988 Third Floor Conference Room ' • Commencing at 8:30 a.m. • TIME/KEY PARTICIPANTS NEW PROJECTS Hudson Annexation and Rezone Application to annex approximately 16.74 acres • of property into the City of Renton and to Rezone it concurrently to R-1. Single Family Residential. Located north of .the existing Renton corporate limits in the vicinity of N.E. 25th Place and Union Avenue N.E.•(132nd Ave. S.E.); Section 3, Township 23N, Range 5E, WM. ECF-053-88 • • Leady Short Plat and Sunset Mini-Storage Application for ' Short Plat approval to subdivide approximately 3.71 acres of commercially zoned property into two (2) lots and application for Conditional Use permit to allow a mini-storage warehouse facility on Lot #1 and application for Site Plan approval as required by restrictive covenants . for said development on the subject site. ' Located on the north side of N.E. Sunset Blvd. at the 4400 block. SH-PL-052-88; CU-052-88; SA-052-88 Melinda Lyle-Pier Construction at 2827 Mountain-Avenue Addition of 39 foot pier to existing 61 foot pier adjacent to a private home at 2827 Mountain Avenue. This addition is intended to provide a location for winter boat moorage. Located at 2827 Mountain Avenue (on Lake Washington) ECF-044-88; SM-044-88t Bennett Community Builders-Heritage Forest Apartments Application to rezone approximately 1.22 acres ' of property from G-1 to -R-3 and application for site approval to allow the development of a 28 unit apartment complex on said property to be called "Heritage Forest Apartments".• Located on the south side of N.E. 5th Street at the 4200 Block. ECF-018-88; R-018-88; SA- 018-88 ' • BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE STAFF REPORT July 27, 1988 • A. BACKGROUND: APPLICANT: Bennett Community Builders, Inc. PROJECT: Heritage Forest Apartments ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF;R;SA 018-88 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application to rezone approximately 1.22 acres of property from G-1, General Use, to R-3 , Medium-Density, Multi-Family Residential and application for site plan approval to allow the development of a 28 unit apartment complex on said property, to be called "Heritage Forest Apartments. " , LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 4200 Block of N.E. 5th Street, on the south side of N.E. 5th Street and east of Union Avenue N.E. Technical Advis---r Committee Staff Report • Bennett Communi Page 2 July 27, 1988 B. ISSUES: (LAND USE) 1. Consistency with Comprehensive Plan and Land Use in the area - The Comprehensive Plan calls for commercial use on this site. However, the property is surrounded on three sides with R-3 zone and medium- density multi-family uses. These R-3 uses include new developments and viable developments which have been around for some time. The N.E. Renton Section of the Comprehensive Plan projects significant residential growth in that section of the City. The proposed rezone to R-3 and 28 unit residential development is consistent with the other residential uses in the area. Commercial development on this site, while consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, poses difficulties. It would place a commercial node on a site which is surrounded on three sides with residential uses. Access to a commercial development on this parcel would be restricted to N.E. 5th Street, a street which is designed to serve residential developments. Traffic along the road would increase significantly (see Traffic Impacts section) with commercial development. Even if access were from the B-1 zones parcel immediately to the south office a commercial development on this site would be intrusive. Commercial property immediately to the south already provides goods and services which are conveniently located to the residential users. Also, sufficient land is available in the area for additional commercial development to meet future consumer needs. 2. Open-space/landscaping - City landscaping • staff and Parks/Recreation representatives are suggesting revision to the site plan which incorporates expanded open space•, enhanced with such amenities as benches and picnic tables, and, perhaps, a tot lot, to better accommodate adults and children living here. Additionally, the applicant will be required to provide five (5) feet of landscaping inside the property line along N.E. 5th Street.. Finally, the applicant's fencing plan depicts fencing of both four (4) feet and six (6) feet in height along property boundaries. This plan must be revised to be consistent with Code requirements for specific height limits and to adequately screen the property for light and glare. 3 . Crime prevention systems - it is suggested that the applicant incorporate an exterior lighting system, dead bolt locks, and alarm systems in order to mitigate against risk Of crime in this development. Technical Advis--, Committee Staff Report . Bennett Communi Page 3 July 27, 1988 4. Fire prevention systems - The applicant will be required to provide access lanes, hydrants and other fire prevention systems as mandated by the Fire Prevention Bureau. (ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES) 1. Topography - Site is characterized by rolling topography. Applicant states that maximum slope is 10%, and proposes to prepare the land for development and use by soil infill of approximately 1000 cubic yards on the western portion of the property, in combination with such other stabilizing devices as rockeries, planting dividers and open spaces. This proposal is intended to allow for retention of a majority of existing trees on the property. NOTE: The applicant indicates that a soils study is underway. This should be required to be certain that soil type and slope are suited for proposed development, and that proposed grade and fill operation is appropriate, and without significant potential for deleterious impacts on neighboring properties. A soils report submitted for Windsor Hills Apartments, immediately due east of the proposed project indicated that infilling could be adequately supported by the existing soils base) . If infill is permitted on this property, grade and fill should be subject to approval by the City. 2 . Existing habitat - Site presently hosts significant number of evergreen and ' deciduous trees. Songbirds have also been seen on site. No endangered species of flora or fauna are identified by applicant; Fisheries and Game confirms applicant findings. Applicant has submitted a plan which includes retention of seven (7) of the existing trees. This plan has been approved by the City's landscape planner, with the recommendation that all grade/fill activities be implemented in a manner which protects those trees. Other landscaping and open/space plans will be addressed later in this report. 3 . Traffic impacts - 9.2 per unit with proposed development (9. 2 x 28 units = 257) vs. 957 trips if the property were developed to the maximum permitted commercial density (assumes retail uses) . Only access to property is along N.E. 5th Street; if property were developed for commercial use those persons who must use the street to travel to and from their homes would be required to share the street with commercial users, causing a significant traffic increase and likely requiring upgrading of street improvements. Technical Advis r Committee Staff Report Bennett Communi_l Page 4 July 27, 1988 4. Storm drainage - The applicant has provided a detention/retention pond and grassy swales for storm drainage management on site. Site topography, site development and neighboring developments must be taken into account in planning a storm drainage system. The design and implementation of the drainage system should be subject to approval by the City. 5. Public service improvements - Adequate public services and improvements are available to accommodate the proposed development. However, the applicant may be required to take steps to ensure that the property is adequately served by those services/improvements, such as making a connection to the sanitary sewer system, submitting an approved water plan, and participating in systems development charges for area improvements. (See attached Utility Engineering comments for specific requirements. ) 6. Construction impacts - It is anticipated that there will be several impacts to the vicinity from construction activities, such as: construction noise and vehicular traffic; creation of dust and debris incidental to both grade and fill and building activity; and erosion. In order to mitigate noise impacts, operation should be restricted to hours between 7 a.m. and 5 p.m. (Note: EDMA has not been checked -- so this is open for discussion. ) In order to mitigate against dust and debris, applicant should water down the site as necessary and wash truck wheels down before those vehicles leave the site. In order to mitigate against erosion, the applicant should be required to develop an erosion control plan subject to approval by the City's landscape planner. Additionally it is suggested that the applicant be required to provide a bond in the amount of $1, 000 to ensure street clean-up during the construction period. 7. Noise, light & glare - The proposed residential development will be impacted by noise from commercial developments to the southwest and by potential commercial development to the south. It is suggested that existing features be augmented (e.g. brick fencing, building/unit orientation, extra insulation, air-conditioning) if necessary or an alternative site plan developed to mitigate against noise and other impacts associated with commercial development on the site to the south. 8. Displacement - The subject property presently has one single-family residence. and attendant outbuildings. The structure Technical Adviso- Committee Staff Report , Bennett Communit Page 5 July 27, 1988 is not inhabited at present. It will need to be demolished to accommodate the proposed development. C. RECOMMENDATIONS: It is recommended that ERC issue a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated - for the proposed rezone and site plan, with the following conditions: 1. That the applicant provide a storm drainage plan to accommodate a 25 year storm event subject to approval by the City. 2 . That the applicant provide a design plan for open space, landscaping and screening which provides for retention of maximum open space/natural environment for habitat enhancement, for passive/active recreational opportunities for residents (adults and children) , and for screening of the property, subject to approval by the City. 3 . That the applicant provide an erosion control plan to mitigate construction impacts, subject to approval by the City. 4. That the applicant limit construction operations to hours between 7 a.m. and 5 p.me to mitigate noise impacts. 5. That the applicant be required to periodically wet down the construction site with water to limit dust and debris. 6. That the applicant be required to wash down truck wheels with water prior to their leaving the site to minimize tracking of dirt onto the public right-of-way. 7. That the applicant be required to provide a bond in the amount of $1, 000 to ensure street clean-up during construction operations. 8. That the applicant individually construct and/or participate in the construction of improvements to the site and the vicinity, as required by the City. 9. That the applicant considers an alternative site plan that orients some of the buildings to N.E. 5th thereby reinforcing the existing streetscape and placing parking at the rear of the site as a buffer between the units and commercial development to the south. Note: The applicant will provide a soils report which confirms the suitability of the site for the proposed infill and development, subject to approval by the City. D. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS: Various City departments have reviewed and commented upon the project. These comments are as follows: Technical Advis • Committee Staff Report Bennett Communi Page 6 July 27, 1988 Police Department: Land Use: • No comments. Environmental: Traffic/noise related problems during construction. Addressing of complex crime prevention factors. (i.e. alarm systems, lighting, dead bolts) Fire Prevention Bureau: Land Use: See comment sheet. Environmental: See comment sheet. Design Engineering: Land Use: Environmental: Traffic Engineering: Land Use: Environmental: Utility Engineering: Land Use: Not approved. (See comment sheet) Environmental: Needs approved utility plan. Needs sanitary connection to south gravity line on N.E. 4th Street. Parks and Recreation: Land Use: Benches and open spaces need to be integrated. Building A & E could be moved north toward N.E. 5th Street which would expand the usable open space to accommodate adult use as well as child use. Environmental: This project has some attractive design features such as connecting sidewalks, benches, centrally located mail boxes, landscaping through the parking area and primarily passive open space. Open space expansion should be considered. How the benches and adjacent open space will function together should also be considered. Building Division: Land Use: Distances between buildings and distances to property lines should be shown on plans. Environmental: No comments. Technical Advise Committee Staff Report Bennett Communi. Page 7 July 27, 1988 Zoning Division: Land Use: Environmental: 1. All effort should be done to save existing Fir trees on site (illustrated on landscape plan) from damage due to grading and building construction on the site. 2. Is on site recreation adequate? How is "open play area" to be utilized by children - should tot lot be provided? 3. A picnic table within one of the lawn areas may be desirable for the tenants of the complex. Policy Development: Land Use: More information needed. Statement of justification incorrectly identifies Comli. Plan as office park. In fact, it is commercial. With all of the new and proposed multiple family units in this corridor, applicant needs to support contention that commercial uses are not appropriate on this site. Environmental: 1. Needs to evaluate BMP for drainage. Basin is **identified as "critical" by public works. On site detention/retention should be evaluated. 2. What habitat areas exist on site? Where are they? 3. Applicant should explore option of gas heating for units. 5. The proposal is not consistent with zoning or Comprehensive Plan. Land use impacts should be addressed more thoroughly. 6. Transportation impacts need to be evaluated. '.;,. . . CITY iF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT IMMO Earl Clymer, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director July 26, 1988 Mr. Todd R. Bennett 5720 Lakeview Drive Kirkland, WA 98033 RE: Heritage Forest Apartments File Nos. ECF-018-88, R-018-88, SA-018-88 Dear Mr. Bennett: The Building and Zoning Department has formally accepted the above referenced project. It has been routed for departmental review and is tentatively scheduled for the Technical Advisory Committee on July 27, 1988 for consideration. • If you have any questions regarding the scheduling of your project, please contact our office at 235-2550. ly, Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator acceptltr DKE:adk • • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 ® CITY OF RENTON "LL BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director July 14, 1988 • Todd R. Bennett 5720 Lakeview Drive Kirkland, WA. 98033 Subject: Heritage Forest Apartments File No.s ECF-018-88, R-o18-88, SA-018-88 Dear Mr. Bennett: In reviewing the information submitted for the above referenced application for site plan approval, we noticed that we did not receive a certified list of the.adjacent property owners around the subject property. This is a necessary requirement per the site plan approval ordinance with the City. We have enclosed a blank form for which these adjacent property owners are to be listed. Also required as part of this process is to have mailing labels and first class postage stamps provided for each property owner. The City, in turn, will mail out notices of the site plan approval to these adjacent property owners with our letterhead and envelopes. Your prompt assistance with this matter will be appreciated. Sincerely, • Jerry F. Lind Land Use Inspector JFL:sr Enclosure 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 • 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: V.Q/1 Q 121 QA TP/YI V.AYl friod r+707:e rr DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 30, 1988 COMMENTS DUE:.TUT.VK1TY9-818A i.." EFC - 018 - 88 APPLICATION NO(S). : REZONE • R-1 R-RR STTF. PT4N APPBOVAT SA-018-88 PROPONENT: BENNETT COMMTTNTTV RTTTT.TIF.RS '+ Q- IG3 PROJECT TITLE: HERTTAnF. F(1RF.ST APARTMENTS A,,,. . BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMAZ` . Y 2. 22 ACRES OF ROPERTY FROM..G-1 •TO R-3 AND APPLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE DEVELOPFMEN' F A , 28 UNII APAR11iiEN'1 LOMELEX UN SAID PROPERTY TO BE CALLED: "HERTAC=r; FOREST PARTMFNT S''' LOCATION: LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF N.E . 5th STREET AT' THE 4-200;'BLOCK SITE AREA: BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth • 2) Air 3) Water • 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation • . 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation f�. .1 f T R , F. t, i 14) Transportation ` L Cl lr 15) Public Services V a ,i ?G r)(14 C ii a 16) Utilities COMMENTS: • Any development and/or construction shalt comply with current Fire and Building Codes and Ordi- nances. A second means of access is required. Fire.partment access roads/lanes shall be paved minimum width 20'; ; minimum height 13' 6". Yes_,....,_ o Preliminary fire flow calculations show a fire flow of ,s® e is required. -3 hydrants with a minimum flow of , s'oo® gpm each is required. • Primary hydrant is required to be within /451® feet of the structure. Secondary hydrants are required to be within_____ . ,Tao feet of the structure. An approved automatic sprinkler system is required to protect the total structure: Yes No AR fire department access roads are.to be paved and installed prior to construction. Yes...1.!.. No— All fire hydrants are required to be installed and approved prior to construction. Yes ✓ No , We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas. we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative lie Form d RENTON 1ILDING & ZONING DEPAR1 :NT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION R rIEW�,;,S1-1L,E; ECF - 018 _ 88 APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE: R-018-88, SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-018-88 PROPONENT ; BENNETT COMMUNITY BUILDERS, INC. 71111 PROJECT TITLE : HERITAGE FOREST APARTMENTS BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 1.22 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM G-1 TO R-3 AND APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL lu ALLOW Mt UETELOPMENT OF A 28 UNIT APARTMENT COMPLEX ON SAID PROPERTY TO BE CALLED: "HERITAGE FOREST APARTMENTS" . LOCATION : LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF N.E. 5th STREET AT THE 4200 BLOCK. • TO : n PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE• [1] ENGINEERING DIVISION n TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : n UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU tto PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT 'BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT - :, -; POLICE DEPARTMENT p POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT i El OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P .M. ON JULY 12, 1988 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; f/R PR x,EIJ1fOJ n APPROVED n APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS n NOT APPROVED Any development and/or construction shall comply with current Fire and Building codes and Ordi- nances. A second means of approved access is required. Fire Department access roads/lanes shall be paved minimum width 20'; minimum height 13' 6". Yes .. No Preliminary fire flow calculations show a fire flow of 7SO is required. ',_ .� , , hydrants with a minimum flow of /orPer gpm each is required. Primary hydrant is required to be within OS'a feet of the structure. Secondary hydrants are required to be Within ,3406 feet of the structure. An approved automatic sprinkler system is required to protect the total structure. Yes No,.., All fire department access roads are to be paved and installed prior to coast►action. Yes!No All fire hydrants are required to be installed and approved prior to construction. Yes ' No..._ DATE: /e"...3w .'D, /9XI SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 • p),04°00,1R 5t1.gs, .O c & 5,tot7, LC cilb,,y1L'oa!s!,s "47'.) Cv:ir4tgt„ ,V.3`t`!"; V-U 4:0Pf.:11 L;O• 'If, • t c ,Iph% U-4.01 :01ILLF €! - u..31,2:,:cy.;f,<7;02 s'aj1,6p 'PG Mit0 • \ • • . . . • • . • • • ' 'Pr," ; .rt"-";•-• • • ;!.., • • 2149N • ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REI�IEW SHEET (4 \' REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: rr�� x DATE CIRCULATED: JUKE 30,r988 COMMENTS DUE:_TLTT.v 1 9 , 1988 t�•A A� '' EFC - 018 - 88 Q® APPLICATION NO(S). : REZONE• R-1 8-RR , STTR PT-AN APPPOVAJ . SA-018-88 PROPONENT: BENNETT. COMMTTNTTV RTTTT.11FR5 PROJECT TITLE: HERTTACWF FOREST APARTMENTS E BRIEF DESSCIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 1. 22 ACRES OF ROPERTY FROM,;.G-1 .TO R-3 AND APPLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE DEVELOPFMENS F A', 28 UNIT APARTMr.1V'1" UOMPLEX UN SAIL) .PROPERTY TO :13E GALLED: "HERTAGE FOREST PARTMEXTSIL LOCATION: LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF tN.E. 5th STREET AT' THE 4-200:"BLOCK SITE AREA: BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air L/ 3) Water • 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources /---" 7,) Environmental Health ,�- 8) Land and Shoreline Use ei 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 1.--/ 14) Transportation 64n4 7riP ,,cfl /� � Z_, �_, s: 15) Public Services 1i 'u1 16) Utilities COMMENTS: /-zj-i-z/ . /gyp , 7 // D We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and 'have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to roperly assess this proposal. Atd, '‘21 Signature of Director o Authorized Representative Date Form 4 `.16 a OA • PLAN REVIEW ROUTIN SLIP - ATTACHMENT Date 12-8-87 APPLICANT: Windsor Place Assoc. JOB ADDRESS: 455 Bremerton Ave. NE NATURE OF WORK: Revisions REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION.: Traffic Engineering • ' 1. Street lighting plans required on 22"x34" mylars and to City standards To include: N.E. 4th Street street property frontage N.E. 5th Street Anacortes Ave. N.E. 2.: Need completed plans for two-way center left-turn lane on N.E. 4th Street at Anacortes Ave.. N.E. The proposed two-way center lane is to be matched • u•::: into the existing two-way center lane to the west of Anacortes Ave. N.E. and match with the County proposal to the east. 3. Provide a left-turn pocket on Anacortes Ave. N.E. at N.E. 4th Street. 4. Full street improvements required on N.E. 4th Street across project frontage' no end near Union Ave. N.E. (north side) . 5. The most southerly driveway onto Anacortes Ave. N.E. is to be an emergency access only with chain. 6. Mitigation fee for signal coordination in the N.E./N.E. 4th Street traffic corridor. Fee charge is $2.37 per trip generated Project Phase I 158 units r„ Project Phase II 44 units Apartment general trip generated per unit 6.1 Phase I $2.37 x 6.1 x 158 = $2,284.21 Phase II $2.37 x 6.1 x 44 = 636.11 I Fee Total $2,920.32 Fee to be paid at time permit is acquired. • • • RENTON IILDING & ZONING DEPART pNT 04. DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW? J-I` t %so� NO ECF - 018 _ 88 .fit `t APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE: R-018-88, SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-018-88 ®� PROPONENT : BENNETT COMMUNITY BUILDERS, INC. PROJECT TITLE : HERITAGE FOREST APARTMENTS APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 1.22 ACRES OF PROPERTY BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: FROM G-1 TO R-3 AND APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL IO ALLOW INt utVtN1'r%ir.lu OF A 28 UNIT APARTMENT COMPLEX ON SAID PROPERTY TO BE CALLED: "HERITAGE FOREST APARTMENTS". LOCATION : LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF N.E. 5th STREET AT THE 4200 BLOCK. TO : ri PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE; ENGINEERING DIVISION FTRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : n UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION n FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU • PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT n BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT n POLICE DEPARTMENT n POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT n OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P .M. ON JULY 12, 1988 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Ail n APPROVED 7 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS n NOT APPROVED �® s ec r � s � �� b a/`� -7 /fie 7`�`-`> /, yam`°- 2., /1 F 1 - , /1/4//ip2 (Se_ DATE : f/ � SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR UTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 ��,-,. i c •-•,, V't ,4 te:'•• PLAN REVIEW ROUTIN SLIP - ATTACHMENT Date 12-8-87 APPLICANT: Windsor Place Assoc. JOB ADDRESS: 455 Bremerton Ave. NE NATURE OF WORK: Revisions REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Traffic Engineering 1. Street lighting plans required on 22"x34" mylars and to City standards To include: N.E. 4th Street street property frontage N.E. 5th Street Anacortes Ave. N.E. 2. Need completed plans for two-way center left-turn lane on N.B. 4th Street at Anacortes Ave. N.E. The proposed two-way center lane is to be matched ! into the existing two-way center lane to the west of Anacortes Ave. N.B. and match with the County proposal to the east. 3. Provide a left-turn pocket on Anacortes Ave. N.E. at N.E. 4th Street. 4. Full street improvements required on N.E. 4th Street across project frontage no end near Union Ave. N.E. (north side) . 5. The most southerly driveway onto Anacortes Ave. N.E. is to be an emergency access only with chain. 6. Mitigation fee for signal coordination in the N.E./N.E. 4th Street traffic corridor. Fee charge is $2.37 per trip generated Project 'Phase I 158 units Project Phase II 44 units • Apartment general trip generated per unit 6.1 Phase I $2.37 x 6.1 x 158 = $2,284.21 Phase II $2.37 x 6.1 x 44 = 636.11 Fee Total $2,920.32 Fee to be paid at time permit is acquired. • • 2149N ENVIRONTT LICHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 50./0, 1 COMMENTS DUE:_TMTT.Y 1 DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 30, 988 , 1988 EFC - 018 - 88 APPLICATION NO(S). : REZONE • ' R-1 R-RR , STTF PLAN APPROVAL, SA-018-88 PROPONENT: BENNETT COMMTTNTTv RTTTT.nRRR PROJECT TITLE: HRRTTA1F. FOREST APARTMENTS • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 1. 22 ACRES OF ROPERTY FROM..G-1TO R-3 AND APPLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE DEVELOPEMEN; F A , Z8 UIQIT APARTMENT UOMYL1 X UN SAID PROPERTY TO BE GALLED: "HERTACE FOREST PAR1'MFNTSP1 LOCATION: LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF N.E . 5th STREET AT THE 4.200.",BLOCK SITE AREA: BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing /mil 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: CYr7Y PrNTOti • JUN 301 U8 ZONING DEPT. We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or.-areas where additional information is needed o properly assess this proposal. _ b -3 o -d/ Signatu -e f Director or Authorized Representative Date Form e RENTON ..JILDING & ZONING DEPART ;NT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 018 _ 88 APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE: R-0•18-88, SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-018-88 PROPONENT : BENNETT COMMUNITY BUILDERS, INC. PROJECT TITLE : HERITAGE FOREST APARTMENTS BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 1.22 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM G-1 TO R-3 AND APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL IL) ALLOW IHt uEVELOi'MENT OF A 28 UNIT APARTMENT COMPLEX ON SAID PROPERTY TO BE CALLED: "HERITAGE FOREST APARTMENTS" . LOCATION ; LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF N.E. 5th STREET AT THE 4200 BLOCK. TO : 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE; El ENGINEERING DIVISION n TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : n UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION n FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BU I LD I NG,& Cr=DEPARTMENT El POLICE DEPARTMENT n POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ri OTHERS ; COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 ; 00 P .M. ON JULY 12, 1988 , REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : '7J Z--D n APPROVED EN. APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS El NOT APPROVED 0;s 7,g,uc{-_J- /eG�6.v-c /,` " f 6 6 J I (- / � /c -,'��1 Q� V CS����) L//lJ S s`�®CC L� �� s/icQc-J,L., © e L rams ,r ' DF- ,Os�rn�El R ' C EED JUN 3 oiga8 tUIL.,-.Xi,: /ZONING DEPT. i ,--_, e- z � DATE ; CP- CCU �� SIGNATURE OF RECTOR OR AUTHOR ZED REPRESENTATIVE 1 ‘ :;7 REVISION 5/1982 -,_—__ Ion - . ,, , , . ,t. L _ 1, • 11,. • , , „, , ,, 2149N E, IRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REV W SHEET /- t A-cz, REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Cvyi O C J P X r / 1. to L/G 4., ' DATE CIRCULATED: JUTE 30.1988 COMMENTS DUE: TTJT.v 12 1 88'�' l j ® )0 9 Qti. EFC - 018 - 88 - 0' :515' ' OA APPLICATION NO(S). : REZONE • • R-1 R-RR , RTTF PLAN APPBOVAT , RA-018-88 • 4 ' c PROPONENT: BENNETT COMMTTNTTv RTTTT.TIFRR •0 . PROJECT TITLE: HERTTA(;F. F(WE T APARTMENTS 4A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 1. 22 ACRES OF ROPERTY FROM..G-1 TO' R-3 AND .APPLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE, DEVELOPFMEN' F A., 28\,trill APARTMENT LOMY. LEX U N SAID J'KOPERTY TO BE GALLED: "HERl'AGE FOREST PARTMENTS'! ' . • LOCATION: LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF N.E. 5th STREET AT' THE 4200;;BLOCK SITE AREA: g BUILDING AREA (gross): ' • IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth . . 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals , 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation ' ' 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation • • 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities , COMMENTS: TA /ds B:/ �7 / ./ f 0 7P cf/f`�i e-1/e/ec/eV rw t":a ,'e/ f 4 A f to/40 ee, i n 6. 1l ddcv0 /42r, .6'-4J •Cent `/k """ 7 mai/ G%eJ/ /iNdl(Qf(n . - /A/- 4/6 f& 'ail 4fAir arg- �1 . /�/r�•l � '/c /7 if e „ . „,a„. • /ae, r f'(e e oifl°4- Mote/el 6e `a7 f7-Oleoez- .i d J /G e 6eWc4.0:/ aJ &, e�7i-- o, ec4 .ix ce eve-7/ iZ l f1/4i /ye ems- fAcrld , /trd 4e G�a�2/' Cleferci w We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. AeieWoc., . �/ /), l?1�� ' Signat o Director or Authorized Representative Date y Form d RENTON -IILDING & ZONING DEPAR1 ENT .G o� DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SH E T ':°'. * qip -lb 018 _ 88 �'' ECF Q APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE: R-018-88, SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-018-88 4� PROPONENT : BENNETT COMMUNITY BUILDERS, INC. • PROJECT TITLE : HERITAGE FOREST APARTMENTS BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 1.22 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM G-1 TO R-3' AND APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL iu ALLOW IHE utiELOPMENT OF A 28 UNIT APARTMENT COMPLEX ON SAID PROPERTY TO BE CALLED: "HERITAGE FOREST APARTMENTS". LOCATION : LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF N.E. 5th STREET AT THE 4200 BLOCK. TO: 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE; ENGINEERING DIVISION LTRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU 14 PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT El POLICE DEPARTMENT III POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 0 OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P .M. ON JULY 12, 1988 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : QCAM . P(U,ML.ttLAJLAYrN n APPROVED [XI APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 0 NOT APPROVED gefWg_/ -r.( 0,69"-- f,e(e-/ neevi ee 1:q7/62e/V‘'d 1/0//d9' I f t,,,i/of 6e mood 9oda7L -/-44.-e*/, / A/e 5-A pfrelot ,,,,Ad- wdam/rx a� / 74e Qiiw6 /267,2 . f`j&l e 46/o liv G d,/le a 4/44..1i--- ez/e j cve°// al G i/d tC/e '. DATE: C./e4 i2 '19"ege SIGMA E OF DIR CTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 v,,y,,, 1st) iG� q� Fti -4% 2149N ENVIRO NT1r CJHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ®�� G�,j �) ��.% REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: - l k/l .I A �.. , `i`1 6 DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 30 .1988 COMMENTS DUE:.TTTT.Y 12 , 1988 4'.l EFC - 018 - 88sue APPLICATION NO(S). : RFZONF • • R-1 R-RR STTF PLAN APPROVAJ ' SA-018-88 PROPONENT: BENNETT COMMTTNTTv RITTT.TWRS PROJECT TITLE: HFRTTAGF. FORF.ST APARTMFTQTS ' BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 1. 22 ACRES OF ROPERTY FROM:.G-1 .TO. R-3 AND .APPLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE DEVELOPFMEN' F A , 2'8 U1'1II APARTMENT UUMY. LEA UN SAID PROPERTY TU . LE GALLED: "HERTAGE FOREST PAR rr . . • . LOCATION: LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF N.E. 5th STREET AT' THE 4200;;BLOCK SITE AREA: BUILDING AREA (gross): • IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION . IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth . 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation' 15) Public Services 144: 16) Utilities COMMENTS: • 14 4415 4004 (JaarP14*) e••‘‘ itieds (0.1 • k .6. , 4?(.4 4 Cove• ch"d . . A16 eiri4.57'• 12•23 s s, ritr We have reviewed this application with particular .attention to those areas we. r have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional in tion is eeded to properly assess this proposal. 3) Signature of Direct, or Authorized Representative Date Form d RENTOrILDING & ZONING DEPAR NT 40t DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW I-k it '/ti,. . ' 0"+yam i C 88 S ��9 t ECF - 018 _ s`�,, �� APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE: R-018-88, SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-018-88 04 PROPONENT : BENIIETT COMMUNITY BUILDERS, INC. ; PROJECT TITLE : HERITAGE FOREST APARTMENTS BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 1.22 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM G-1 TO R-3 AND APPLICATION FOR SHE PLAN APPROVAL IU ALLOW Mt VEVELOPMENT. OF A 28 UNIT APARTMENT COMPLEX ON SAID PROPERTY TO BE CALLED: "HERITAGE FOREST APARTMENTS" . LOCATION : LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF N.E. 5th STREET AT THE 4200 BLOCK. TO : n PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE; I=1 ENGINEERING DIVISION n TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : OUTILITIES ENG , DIVISION n FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU n PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT n 'BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT n POLICE DEPARTMENT n POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT n OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON JULY 12, 1988 , REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : ( ,(Aki,(A .1 Q,t) n APPROVED n APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 1 NOT APPROVED rV60 $ IM'4 .)- PLAIAlc I-UTILITY APPROVAL SUBJECT TO I LATE COMERS AGREEMENT-VMER NO --- ' LATE COMERS AGREEMENT-SEWER MO Do SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-WATER yrs 1/7S 2 X. a2 e,ni - �r '9®®, Oo SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-SEWER1 y$ 1s i7S fj Ai ati t =7fo 00• p®' SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE-WATER No : `T -; SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE-SEWER jJo V'' ` 3 Fl € t' P 'APPROVED WATER PUN �/, , Nc6.JS Its AS Sd '' [� V , APPROVED SEWER PUNF. f p. } APPROVED FIRE HYDRANT I.00ATIOEI!S BY FIRE DEPT. 415 i „ `t. 1,_ , , -< -- .'.-/-e5 - FIRE I IC:'1 Ge:ftIYSIS �_., DATE : 7 /7-- Ar SIGNATURE OF DIRE OR 0 AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE 7 g it, , ,,,g�► ?-it - -- ✓7`- REVISION 5/1982 ----- ,n-) 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Zo POI10 DATE''CIRCULATED• ` JUNF 3 0: ,8 r--, z �, >1;4g ,-"e ,....... :t .., m .>s. �.; ..:,..,..,,,�..,..�. p p q t7i5;.�r.rsp'.y�l �,} „��{,�tit:�'�,`"' �`,p�, ^'S'':�n•a,j•r;,.,�j,��.l•r h"' Y •i!'�r r�l' �c}; E FC 18 — 8 8 ?';.�l LI • '' `,wi !",30 f:si ) l;;,q *.}.p, 1 F•4j P f rl; �"l'1r • .,�'•• �r�,a1'•,r;;,i rf;•.f.,;Y",;:,•; ;.rt�,, ts..,;,,.'ry�l, , APPLICATION NO(S) • REZONE R-1 R-RR RTTE PAPA = ,A 'tr 'f+;,, • .ADT .A. PBOV�iT' .4A`018`88 ,rr..; • l PROPONENT: BENNETT COMMTTNTTV RTTTT.TIFRS • PROJECT TITLE: HERITAGE. FORF.ST APARTMFNT4 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 1. 22 ACRES OF ROPERTY FROM..G-1TO R-3 AND APPLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE DEVELOPFMEfi; F A , 28 UNIT APAR•:CMEN'1' UUMPLEX UN SAID PROPERTY TO BE CALLED: "HERTAC-E FOREST ?ARtME.NIS LOCATION: LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF N.E . 5th STREET AT• THE 4200".BLOCK SITE AREA: BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) , Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: 0 ALL EFFORT St-i CwLO Ooni TO s .6Y ISTI I'j �I R j LE 5- or s 1i6 ( 1c uG.STR.m-tio OIJ LoK)03CPPC 0 L000 ) yj6- GRiNioirv6 1 3Ut1A)ru( (-,O(05TR t-roA) 010 i ct r oo° eauli-N z l Ls ©peV p� � To 6e u1IU1t6I fay c14tLOR - s► `�,i° Tod L4)-( pkoolow t PIC�IUIL YPc6lk, 11141 uO oIA.6 c -t+ (IW&) nrI j ( , ovzioreL6 Fit PW-1 5 cr -016 We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. C-VV CI.. 7" 13- 8S Signature of Dizpctor or Authorized Representative Date Form 4 RENTOL .JUILDING & ZONING DEPAR r i 1ENT r DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 018 _ 88 APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE: R-018-88, SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-018-88 PROPONENT : BENNETT COMMUNITY BUILDERS, INC. PROJECT TITLE : HERITAGE FOREST APARTMENTS BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 1.22 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM G-1 TO R-3 AND APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL IU ALLOW IHt DEVELOPMENT OF A 28 UNIT APARTMENT COMPLEX ON SAID PROPERTY TO BE CALLED: "HERITAGE FOREST APARTMENTS" . LOCATION : LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF N.E. 5th STREET AT THE 4200 BLOCK. TO : 1-1 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE; 0 ENGINEERING DIVISION n TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : n UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU ( PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT gl,_g„I=Ls& & ZONING DEPARTMENT n POLICE DEPARTMENT n POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :00 P .M. ON JULY 12, 1988 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIV SION : /On/ n APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDT"TIONS O NOT APPROVED ® 1� Y\m&No _. 1 U To 'R-5 ® YYl ho l vi vI o 5' W►!�j�`� O b Nuij.SC14pVV ) O3)OE '3-4 PtZopeftN( l\ t 5 2 u sM,4D ort.acp k 5T srr: ( ( -r1-146 3d6 PLC I U vOso/Ap)tub AAA) 6 LLL45rRee 2- 3 PAP 0 frUe r roTI4E Frzoru / prito C sris-ti, is Lwow k t i1.91-11 pei ( 41 f xic, , toms mac, se- to LNIOOScapi113 puiN ) r J . C DATE : -7-1 8 SIGNATURE 0 1Vh.IRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 ry 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET . oh "4 �4r REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ('J' Yl (1 + lO1/ul oh„: DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 30. 1988 COMMENTS DUE:.TUT.v 12 , 1988 a® ,� EFC - 018 - 88 4%4 APPLICATION NO(S).': REZONE • • R-1 R-RR RTTF PLAN APPBOVAJ SA-018-88 PROPONENT: BENNETT COMMTTNTTV RTTTT.TIFRS PROJECT TITLE: HRRTTAGF. FOREST APARTMFNTG • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 1. 22 ACRES, OF• ROPERTY FROM..G-1 .TO R-3 AND .APPLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE DEVELOPEMEN; F A`, 28 11 AYAKmMr,LV'1' UUMPLEX ON SAID KUYEK.TY TO . BE CALLED: "HERTAGE . OREST .PAR . '" • LOCATION: LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF N.E. 5th STREET AT' THE 4200:"-BLOCK SITE AREA: • g BUILDING AREA (gross): • IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE • MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION • IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth ✓ 2) Air 3) Water �✓ 4) Plants ✓ 5) Animals • L✓ 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing (✓ 10) Aesthetics ✓ 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation ✓ 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation ' 14) Transportation ✓ 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: . We have reviewed this application with particular attention. to those areas we. have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional informat'on is needed to properly assess this proposal. . X. • /..9e/E-1---- • Signature of &rector or ut rized Representative Date • Form A ' `IF i` RENTON c1JILDING & ZONING DEPART__ NT $,c 11 OPX,E ' ky\LbAi DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEIN� tee , ECF - 018 _ 88 ''� 43 0 APPLICATION NO(S) ; REZONE: R-018-88, SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-018-88 PROPONENT : BENNETT COMMUNITY BUILDERS, INC. • • PROJECT TITLE : HERITAGE FOREST APARTMENTS . APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY• 1.22 ACRES OF PROPERTY BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: FROM G-1 TO R-3 AND APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL IU ALLOW II-it DEVECU14IENT OF A 28 UNIT APARTMENT COMPLEX ON SAID PROPERTY TO BE CALLED: "HERITAGE FOREST APARTMENTS" . LOCATION : LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF N.E. 5th STREET AT THE 4200 BLOCK. TO : • n PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE; ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION • SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : n UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION 111 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU ri PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT LS.B.UILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT El POLICE DEPARTMENT n POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT III OTHERS : , COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P ,M, ON JULY 12, 1988 • REVIEWING DEPARTMENfi/DI•VISION : /YL/QL( AMU' Ain U 0 APPROVED n APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 0 NOT APPROVED ) f rav'` Z z x s y ,/ oThe.,0-,L.�.-e_ c fr s,--- .'4,� _� J � � '� e? ( €,,Orle-C -Cet'-'4' jefi-‘ ,.V7-- '776 g--er--1--elz-ie--e-14 -\ ---- iA A/ Est 3 - 41.4-e-:,_._ e .r P4 airy _ 0 gi c.....,)-e,-- /,.c= DATE: 7C re SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR UTHO •IZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 r,_w 1 07 AD\ 2149N E I ONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: n 't (J DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 30. 1988 COMMENTS DUE:JTJT.Y 12, 1988 w EFC - 018 - 88 % APPLICATION NO(S). : REZONE • • R-1 R-RR , STTF. PLAN APPROVAL, SA-01 8-88 PROPONENT: BENNETT COMMITNTTV RTTTT.nFRc • PROJECT TITLE: HERTTAGE FOREST APARTMENTS BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 1 . 22 ACRES OF ROPERTY FROM..G-1 ND TO R-3 A APPLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE DEVELOPFMENS F A . 28 TINT.I.N APAid-MEM UOMYLEx uN SAlll PROPERTY TO . BE CALLED: "HERTAC-E FOREST m:et/ NTH" LOCATION: LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF N.E. 5th STREET AT. THE 4-200:'_',BLOCK SITE AREA: 1 BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY • 1) Earth 2) Air • 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation • 14) Transportation 15)• Public Services • 16) Utilities COMMENTS: 7- /q/ lt/C(4)U j 5e.5 c�li/�i Gam, /st l//ti y .c35-7 if Di741.s s//01f v .0. Gv e z-L /4( 6 Pit 15I/LCv02 GvA) ,e e v/�S • II 7/4 VI� ?) We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and' have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional i formation'' needed to properly assess this proposal. 7 7 u�Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date • RENTON JILDING & ZONING DEPAR', :NT l®® `�� + " ‘ , DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ��°9 o ECF - 018 _ 88 s%0 V APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE: R-018-88, SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-018-88 PROPONENT : BENNNETT COMMUNITY BUILDERS, INC. PROJECT TITLE : HERITAGE FOREST APARTMENTS BRIEF DESCRIPTION. OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 1.22 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM G-1 TO R-3 AND APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL IU ALLOW Ilit DEVELOPMENT OF A 28 UNIT APARTMENT COMPLEX ON SAID PROPERTY TO BE CALLED: "HERITAGE FOREST APARTMENTS" . LOCATION ; LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF N.E. 5th STREET AT THE 4200 BLOCK. TO : n PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE; ENGINEERING DIVISION n TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : n UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION n FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU El PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT 0 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Fl, POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT n OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON JULY 12, 1988 4 , 7 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Q n APPROVED F-1 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 0 NOT APPROVED DATE : 27//////47,,L SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 ` 1 � 2149N ErfR9NMpTAL CHE LIST RE IEW SHEET' Go, 4W4 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: C Q Q c�2,4 NO� G v0 DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 30. 1988 COMMENTS DUE:.TJT.Y 12 , 1988 � > 2:0� EFC -. 018 - 88 o°°0 9 dA? • APPLICATION•NO(S). : RR'zONF. • • R-1 R-RR STTF. PLAN APP OV&T , RA_018-88 OA PROPONENT: BENNETT (:OMMTTNTTV RTTTT.TIRRR 4 A . PROJECT TITLE: T-TFRTTAGF. FOREST APARTMR.NTS BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 1. 22 ACRES OF ROPERTY FROM: G-1TO R-3 AND .APPLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE DEVELOPFMENS F A',28 UNfi APARTM.EN E uOMrLLx UN 6A1U NRUYEKEY TO . BE CALLED: -HERTA.4t FOREST pARTMNIE S r' ' . . . LOCATION: LOCATED ON iHE SOUTH SIDE OF N.E. 5th STREET AT- THE 4-200:' BLOCK SITE AREA: ' BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE • ' MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) - Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics, 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation • • 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: Nees 4D e rcauo 1-e, BPIF fry. a 0ton-e,. .. ..� oe ;. .p a `��,,-�.�z�..� e` 3) 77 70,.c, - .t�-,�/�s /vs_ ao•-•- • L .-GQ L n�� (�v,, Zaic o�-+t�P�X (..e. �) ,-, cti . . We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional infor'tion is needed to properly assess this proposal. 7)4,44,u,i , .(-/�� - /Z -*Signature f girector or Authorized Representative Date • Form 4 t-' , 0 `rfit‘'' • RENTON IILDING & ZONING DEPAR' „=:NT 1;® vG � Fti DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEE'�n `� 'IA TP 6 ECF - 018 _ 88 ®a .0 APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE: R-018-88, SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-018-88 �' PROPONENT : BENNETT COMMUNITY BUILDERS, INC. PROJECT TITLE : HERITAGE FOREST APARTMENTS BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 1.22 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM G-1 TO R-3 AND APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL IU ALLUW Hit utVELOPMENT OF A 28 UNIT APARTMENT COMPLEX ON SAID PROPERTY TO BE CALLED: "HERITAGE FOREST APARTMENTS". LOCATION ; LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF N.E. 5th STREET AT THE 4200 BLOCK. TO : PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE; 0 ENGINEERING DIVISION n TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE.; n UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU OPARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT E0 POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :00 P .M, ON JULY 12, 1988 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : P°r',A P UQ/( 460/x00, fl APPROVED EllAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS JR[NOT APPROVED C: I''t 1a .m r✓ 4" 4P1i-t.ct- /yam IL • '-'- `401- t. ,;t,C . 14.14:ak., a 2X • DATE: 7 - /2 - Ye SIGNATUR F IRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 / ' /Z ,1lami/.v.9-��/ d Ai AT:" REQUIRED FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS 1. HAZARD IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION NAME /eri g- �O 'e25s' A$27-s"' U.B.C. CLASS OF BUILD ADDRESS .// o6, /,ram: ,U_ .3-72 FIRE MGMT AREA 2. DETERMINE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION - CLASS (CIRCLE ONE): I - II IV III FIRE-RESISTIVE NON-COMBUSTIBLE ORDINARY 0-PIEV mIxE (NOTE: IF "MIXED", SEE SPECIAL INSTRUCTION FOR AREA AND BASIC FIRE FLOW)D 3. DETERMINE AREA: GROUND FLOOR AREA; FT2 (A) ,/,�®/�s� NUMBER OF STORIES: / TOTAL BUILDING AREA: ? /, d .C` 4. DETERMINE BASIC FIRE FLOW FROM TABLE It 1, USING AREA CA): r,?p eo 5. DETERMINE OCCUPANCY FACTOR ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: GPM (C) sue) GPM CC) IF LOW HAZARD, SUBTRACT UP TO 25% OF (B): IF HIGH HAZARD, ADD UP TO 25% OF (B) 6. COMPUTE SUB-TOTAL (B+C): CIF 8+C IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) /SOD GPM CD) 7. DETERMINE SPRINKLER ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: - CIF COMPLETELY SPRINKLERED, SUBTRACT UP TO 50% OF CD): IF LIGHT HAZARD OCCUPANCY M CE) AND FIRE RESISTIVE OR NON-COMBUSTIBLE CONSTRUCTION, SUBTRACT UP TO 75% OF CD). 8. DETERMINE EXPOSURE ADJUSTMENT': USING THE TABLE AT LEFT AS A GUIDE, ENTER THE SEPARATION AND ADJUSTMENT FOR EACH OF THE "FOUR FACES" OF THE BUILDING IN THE TABLE AT THE RIGHT: SEPARATION MAX. ADJUSTMENT EXPOSURE SEPARATION ACT. ADJ. NORTH 0 - 10 25% MAX. 3 S ' ADD /S. % 11 - 30 20% MAX. EAST /2' ADD 31 - 60 15% MAX. SOUTH • Ja' 161 -161 00 0 10% MAX. WEST 9' AADDD _l{ 150 OR-1 4-HR WALL 5% MAX. TOTAL % OF ADJUSTMENT ko%Q 0% �. (NOT TO EXCEED 75%) : 75"- % (TOTAL % ADJUSTMENT TIMES CD) ADJUSTMENT: //,7 GPM CF) 9. DETERMINE ROOF AND SIDING COVERING ADJUSTMENT: (IF SHINGLE COVERING, ADD 500 GPM) ADJUSTMENT: `G- GPM (G) 10. COMPUTE ESTIMATED FIRE FLOW REQUIRED: CIF D+E+F+G IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) (IF D+E+F+G IS GREATER THAN 12,000 GPM, INSERT 12,030 GPM) G�-Se- (D+E+F+G) REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: ? 76— GPM (H) i II. SIGNED: . - , L ®- I aTE t �-� 0./9�� • ti ,l ' '''..' if f 1 9;1 EJ �`lY O Cl_ � 'Y OF R.ENTOl�_.. FILE NO(S): P��a ` �� ® BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENTS�G ` �� • MASTER APPLICATION NOTE TO APPLICANT: Since this is a comprehensive application form, only those items related to your specific type of application(s) ore to be completed._ (Please print or type. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) APPLICANT 1 I TYPE OF APPLICATION NAME FEES • Bennett Community Builders, Inc. ® REZONE*(FRO}A•G-1 TO R-3 ) 439 . 00 ADDRESS 5729 Lakeview Drive 0 SPECIAL PERMIT* CITY ZIP TEMPORARY PERMIT* .Kirkland, WA 98033 El CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT* TELEPHONE i x ' SITE PLAN APPROVAL 310 . 06 SPECIAL PERMIT FOR GRADE AND FILL (206) 827-7436 No. of Cubic Yards: ' CONTACT PERSON Q VARIANCE* , From Section: NAME * Justification Required Todd R. Bennett SUBDIVISIONS: ADDRESS CITY OF RENTON 5729 Lakeview Drive 0 SHORT PLAT R -- '.( ' P FCITY ZIP CJ TENTATIVE PLAT • "" ""'y � '" �• Kirkland, WA 98033 0 PRELIMINARY PLAT JUN 2 21988 TELEPHONE Q FINAL PLAT (206) 827-743'6 ® WAIVER E3LH6r DWG/ZON Nj DEPT. (Justification Required) - OWNER NO. OF LOTS: NAME PLAT NAME: Leslie Donner Edwin and Linda Ferkingstad ADDRESS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: Z 3 it `J S 77N a 5 f1 ® PRELIMINARY CITY ZIP 0 FINAL ' 1/40-- wa S `,/rd S-% P.U.D. NAME: TELEPHONE " 6 Z y L/8 /9 Residential 0 Industrial 0 Commercial Q Mixed LOCATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: PROPERTY ADDRESS • 4200 bIry pi cF v ` ® TENTATIVE EXISTING USE PRESENT ZONING PRELIMINARY • FINAL None • • G-1 PROPOSED USE PARK NAME: R-3 NUMBER OF SPACES: 1 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE SQ. FT. ACRES - AREA: 53, 143 1. 22 TOTAL FEES 749 .00 STAFF USE ONLY -- ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING i DATE STAMP APPLICATION RECEIVED BY: r 5� APPLI JION DETERMINED TO BE: Co `� 2 Z -' Accepted Incomplete Notification Sent On By: • (Initials) • DATE ROUTED ADDITIONAL MATERIAL RECEIVED BY: CO50APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: �` 0 Accepted QIncomplete Notification Sent On • By: (Initials) ROUTED TO: • 11 Building 0 Design Eng. !4 Fire Parks PA Police Pi Policy Dev. gla Traffic Eng. Utilities PT VTSPT1 1-11_an • Legal description of property (if more space is required, attach a separate sheet). The east 268 feet of the south 198 feet of the north 629 feet of the northwest 1/4 of the southwest 1/4, of the southwest 1/4 of SPc i—i on 10 . Township 23 north, range 5 east W.M. : Situate in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington. CITY CF RENTON JUN 2 2 1988 ` • AFFIDAVIT GUILDIMG/2OfdMG DEPT. I, ,tP 54 F /7 nP►' , being duly sworn, declare that I am MI authorized representative to act for the property owner,[owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS 7 DAY OF � , 19 MI. NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, RESIDING AT e-e (`' GO (Name of Notary Public) (Signature of Owner) 3 0 .So l�?3 Se0.�0•� Oct, %2.6 K 9 S G' 7 7/4 d 94 (Address) (Address) (City) (State) (Zip) 2D t 2 5 yg19 (Telephone) Acceptance of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete application. Plans and other materials required to constitute a complete application are listed in the "Application Procedure." Form #174 • OF R4,�L� ECF: I6cF-o1g-%3 * O LU: R .. of t4 Co z City of Renton SA_ OM- g8 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 9 �• �9RTE0 t' SEPTt.eP Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.2IC RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for allproposals with probable significant adverse Impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist Is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid Impacts from the proposal, If it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist. to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known. or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should:be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer. or If a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to thequestions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if Yyou can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of,,your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your=\proposal' or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse Impacts. Use of Checklist for Nonproject Proposals: (Please Type or Print Legibly) Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project." "applicant," and "property or site" - should be read as "proposal," "proposer." and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Heritage Forest Apartments 2. Name of applicant: Bennett Community Builders, Inc. CITY OF RENTON 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 111; E E 18�!/E D Todd R. Bennett 5729 Lakeview Drive JUN 2 �g�� Kirkland, WA 98033 (206) 827-7436 .4. Date checklist prepared: I31111LDING/ZONINI brtzisr. June 1988 • 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton 6. Proposed timing or "schedule (including phasing, if applicable): The owner's intend to start construction no later than Nov. 1, 1988 . The project is not proposed to be phased at this time. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansions, or further activity relatod to or connected with this proposal? if yes. explain. No. B. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Soils Report 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes: explain. No. 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. if known. The proposal will require site plan approval as well as a re-Zone of approximately 1.22 acres currently zoned G-1. 11. Give brief. complete description of your proposal,.Including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There 'are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. The project consists of approximately 28 multi-family dwellings, consisting of two bedroom units. The site encompasses approximately 1. 22 acres. This project 'will have apropos( density of approximately 23 units per acre. In the center of the project is an open carport structure covering 10 parking stalls . 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project. including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description. site plan, vicinity map. and topography map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency. you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The project lies within section 10, township 23 north, range 5 east, W.M. The site is comprised of 1 parcel approximately 1. 22 acre. The project lies north of NE 4th street, is bounded on the east by unimproved property, and lies approximately 400 feet from Union Avenue N.E. ' Northeast 5th Street is improved to the northly boundary of the site. • B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General' description of the site (circle one): fla , `rolling. illy, steep slopes. mountainous, other • b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 10% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, caly, sand, gravel. peat. muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Soils report to be completed. • d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so. describe. None. CITY CF RENTON rop), EcRIIVED J1 M - 2 - BUILDING/V:7n DEFT. • e. Describe the purpose. type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. It is our intention to balance cut, and fills. Approximately 2, 000 c.y. of material will be affected . Should fills be required under buildings they will be subject to the approval of the City of Renton and Soils Engineer. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction. or use? If so, generally describe. No. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example. asphalt or buildings)? Approximately 60% h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion. or other impacts to the earth, if any: Temporary erosion control measures will be utilized during construction of the project, subject to the approval and recom- mendations of the..City of Renton. Longterm erosion impacts are not anticipated. 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust. automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any. generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Exhaust emissions from automobiles an( construction equipment during construction is anticipated. The completed project will have automobile exhaust emissions con- sistent with this type of development. b. Are there any off-site sources of emission? None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: During periods of dry weather water will be applied to the road in the surrounding bare areas to prevent the dust particles from becoming air-born. 3. WATER a. . Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes. ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes. please describe and attach available plans. No. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. ' N/A CITY OF RENTON RECP11‘/FD Ir ICJ �, 1PAR - 3 - BUILDING/ZONING D ?PT. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or. diversions? GiV3 general description, purpose, and approximately quantities if known. No. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, . describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and appaoximately quantities if known. Basement foundation drains may withdraw some groundwater, quantities unknown. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals . . .; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. N/A • c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method, of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so. describe. Storn water runoff from roofs, parking areas, and other impervious surfaces will be collected in an underground retention system and released at_a-prescribed-rate in conformance with•..the City of Renton standards . • 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so. generally describe. No. • CITY OF RENTTON �'. . EIVED JUN 2 21988 B1!ILDING7ZONl111G DEPT. - 4 - d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface. ground, and runoff water impacts. if any: Grass lined swales may be proposed in some locations for collecting downspouts and foundation drains. 4. Plants a. Check or circle type; •_ egetation foun. • a the site: deciduous tree: : • 'le. aspe . if evergreen tree(a%cedar pine `• fir o Shrubs o grass • o crop or grain o Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush. skunk cabbage. other o water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil. other X other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Deciduous cottonwoods, alders, and some evergreen species will be removed for roads, buildings and parking areas. Significant stands of fir and cedar will be retained. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Six of 10 existing evergreen trees will be incorporated into passive recreation areas. Landscaping materials such as flowering shrubs and evergreen trees will be used to enhance vegetation. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: Hawk, heron. eaglsongbird;s. other rohi ns Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other Fish: bass, salmon. trout. herring, shellfish. other none b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so. explain. No CITY OF RENTON • JUN 2 21988 • • BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. - 5 - • d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife. if any: Preservation of existing habitat areas. Addition of flowering shrubs and trees will be utilized to attract and provide shelter for wildlife.. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas. oil, wood stove., solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe,whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing. etc. Electrical heating. • b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Triple-glazed windows will be used in 'the apartment units. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards. including exposure to toxic 4.. chemicals, risk of fire and explosion. spill, or hazardous waste. that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No. 1) Describe.special emergency services that might be required. • None 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None . • b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Traffic noise from 4th NE CITY OF RENTON { ; IV . JUN 2 21988 BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. - 6 - • 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic. construction. operation. other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. . Noise impacts from construction activities would occur during the hours of 7:00 AM to 5:00 PM on short-term basis . Long-term impacts would occur as a result of traffic to and from the project. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Earthen berms and landscaping will reduce the long-term impacts . 8. Land and Shoreline Use • a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Residential b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so. describe. No c. Describe any structures on the site. None d. Will any structures be demolished? If so. what? Yes, the residence and sheds e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Tract 1 - Zoned G-1 f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Commercial g. If applicable. what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so. specify. No i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 90 . j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts. if any: CITY OF RENTON Fi None JUN 2 21988 - 7 - BUILDING? ONINO DSPT. • 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The surrounding uses are residential. .This proposal generally reflects current uses in the area. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. 30, middle. b. Approximately how many units. if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None 10. Aesthetics • a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. 34 ' max. height to ridge. Exterior materials will be channel and bevel cedar siding. Roofing will be asphalt composition. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: 2 story . buildings are proposed with no more. than 6 units per building. 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Glare will result primarily from exterior glazing. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or • interfere with views? • No, the best of our knowledge. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Light from traffic at night may impact the proposal. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts. if any: Landscaping and earth. berming to black glare from automobiles to low glare type exterior lighting is proposed. CITY OF RENTTON " fFE7 JUN 2 2 1988 • - 8 - • BUILDING/ZONING DEPT, 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Maplewood golf course, Cedar River Park, Coalfield Park, Coulon Beach Park b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so. describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation. including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant. if any: A children's play area will be provided. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on. or proposed for, national. state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological. scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. An existing public right of way. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximately distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? 49 new spaces ' 0 eliminated • d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets. or improvements to existing roads or streets. not including driveways? If so. generally describe (indicate whether public or private). • No CITY a REt fotI ECEVIh . JUN 2 g 19 iffIJIL®INI /ZON11' OSPT, - 9 - e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water. rail, or air transportation? If so. generally describe. No f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed • project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Not known • g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, If any: None 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection. health care, schools, other)? If so. generally describe. The project will have some impact on the need for the following: police protection, fire protection, and schools. These impacts are not expected to be significant. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Provide on site amenities and recreation opportunities, and good management. 16. Utilities a. Ci utilities, currently a vailablQ_at_..the._sit : .electrici y; natural gas. ater refuse service, ele hon anitary sewer, pis system. other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be.needed. Electricity - Puget Power Telephone - Pacific Northwest Bell Water - Water District #90 Sewer - City of Renton C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned. state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any • declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. / Proponent: ft-VP Name Printed: Todd R. Bennett CITY OF RENTON EIRE":" EIVR: \ JUN 22198 11:DING1zoN5NO DEPy# - 10 - • • ue�flG 9 7_O_Q.• DZYOD M._TM E,ACHUCL ,O C CHRI ECIF9 [P 5 JUNE 21 , 1988 HERITAGE FOREST A P T . S ROOFING - MEDIUM BROWN COMPOSITION SHINGLES FASCIA - CREME CEDAR 1 X 8 TRIM SIDING - PALE BLUE 1 X 6 CEDAR HORIZONTAL BEVEL TRIM - WHITE 1 X 3 CEDAR CITY e/ IMJTOPJ RECEIVED JUN 2 21998 UUILD!NG'/ON!N3 D!PT, BUILDING MATERIALS DAVOCD (` ETD E4\0-10ft . ,AD C C-a11TEGU9 L 5 JUNE 21 , 1988 H E R I T A G E FOREST APTS 4,a, 1 . ENTRY POST IS USED ITFVF,41,11Pr 41011$11°° "Iii'; BRICK WITH BALL LIGHT AT CAP . M 2 . FENCE VARIES IN HEIGHT FROM 4 FT TO 6 FT . 10111 s • 3 . FENCE CONSTRUCTION IS411 CEDAR LATTICE TOP BAND WITH VERTICAL CEDAR BOARD BASE PANEL . CITYCFREN ON 4 . COLORS ARE CREME BACKGROUND WITH WHITE TRIM 'g JUN 2 2 1988 BLEL DING/ZONING DEPTR FENCE CONSTRUCTION ni • .. iLlili F �'if` 5 , 2"'• :'.'.1 lit v.:. . .. ..‘,. • . . ,.•'' ' '0" . 0 0.7; • 4 . �F 1ft r1• v,^ 4 -`r l ,r •\-' t ^' • i ... . �t � • i k , • _I,' ~1� e•.t i !• , • HERITAGE FOREST APARTMENTS r TYPICAL BUILDING LIGHT III,: 1aN•- 1--tr-4 1---ttraka.--1 5901 antique raindrop glass 5902 antique raindrop glass 5901-2 clear gray glass 5902-2 clear gray glass --ta sin---4 i--tr'w. 5901-4 opal glass 5902-4 opal glass 5903 antique raindrop glass 8'Dia.Sphere-100W Max. 10'Dia Sphere-100W Max. 5903-2 clear gray glass ti Classic Outdoor Wall Bracket with Classic Outdoor Wall Bracket with 5903 4 opal glass 1•. choice of glass. choice of glass Textured gray finish Textured gray finish. O Sphere—ie0W Me: Outdd0000 chr .Wall Bracket with choice a S. ,, . glass.Textured gray finish. EEst; . . aJ ',.r:y' It Liu • ,, • , 1•,. ' ,c,'�I , ,I +a. '; .' r`t.t. i • L _ • . '' In I t i) ja 1..1 .• ..tr;,CH Specially treated and prepared Post Oulvdo i[ •- 1411r— cat wall PostulsK ro He• • it . steel tube•textured gray finish. No Thickness Na, It square base cover is desired for w surface posts, specify. SURFACE TYPE POSTS (Round) y.• •HERITAGE FOREST APARTMENTS • � ri TYPICAL LANDSCAPE LIGHT ;r' •'.': .,;• '' •- .• BURIAL TYPE POSTS (Round) 3E-1 120 1',:- • 3' . •� 6E-1 120 1i'W• 6 8E-1 120 17.1§• B' 8F-1 120 2".• 8' • 8G-1 120 31"2' 8' ' a*T=• 9G-1 120 3W' 9' • • : ' ' ,., ) Bunal posi he.gnt given above g'ound 18-beljw ground plus 2 welded lugs 1S-Oa a 2-Imp .- -t ••,13:' ~ ' 8'TWO-PIECE CAST ALUMINUM BASE COVER ;,; FOR UNITS (3E.6E.8E.94`l.8F•8G.9G),Complete • -. ''•r r i HERITAGE FOREST APTS - PROJECT NARRATIVE Heritage Forest is a proposed 28 unit apartment project composed of five separate two story wood frame buildings with gable roofs. The buildings are arranged in a u-shaped layout surrounding an asphalt parking area with 49 required parking stalls. The parking lot is separated into two levels by a four foot high rockery with a planting divider. The core area parking stalls are covered by a carport roof building which is a design focal point at the center of the project. The carport building has some open areas in the roof which allows planting to have daylight access. Entry and exit for the parking area is at two locations from NE 5th Street on the north property line. Surrounding the parking area is a sidewalk system which connects to the main sidewalk along NE 5th Street for public • access. The individual buildings have private walk access from the main perimeter sidewalk system. . Toward the southeast and southwest corners of the parking area are two open space play areas. These two areas are isolated away from automobile traffic and are accessible by sidewalk from all of the residential buildings. Landscaping will be provided at the perimeter of the site, around the open space play areas, and in the rockery divider at the center of the parking area. In addition, numerous large evergreen trees growing on the site at present will be retained. Site improvements will include some importation of fill on the western portion of the property to bring up the grade in a low area. Some 2 ' to 4 ' high rockeries will be used around the site to help balance cut and fill requirements and protect the existing grade around several of the larger trees. At the perimeter of the property there will be a 4 ' to 6' high wood fence to provide privacy and security. C11''r' CF 1 EN ON RECEWE' JUN 221988 latE DINCl/ZON N D PT Design features such as horizontal cedar siding, small glass pane windows, and a step in elevation in the floor level of each building will serve to provide a delicate scale to the project and make it visually compatible with the existing residential character of the surrounding neighborhood. The entire 28 units and all supporting structures and improvements will be completed in one phase with the anticipated construction period of eight months. 0241 CITY CF REMON RECEN 6 " JUN 2 P 1988 BUELDINS%ZONal,`e4 "a DEPT. CONFERENCE REPORT NAME OF PROJECT: CAJA) C71'V1murk)i7 f cr. )".4 l.,176-N DATE OF CONFERENCE: AP I�-IL, 14'- 1 /i L.J� PROJECT NUMBER: R-o P1 -C-X i TIME: I -4r • (START) 2 ��C� � f4 - (END) NAME AND TITLE OF ORGANIZATION PHONE PEOPLE_ATTENDING PRvi /eZKI" 67K/) 0D,0 ge.,),i e 7 C 7 - ? Y 3‘ 4 Ike ��T�c,+�=G h� �� 8y? `71� y commis: I A3 ) JO Cr ' tZok,e, of.) PRO )a:1 3I-tbLAK) Np p RoO L? / I ° ' � '' CITY OF RENTON NIL , �� BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director April 1, 1988 Mr. Todd Bennett 5729 Lakeview Drive Kirkland, WA 98033 SUBJECT: Bennett Community Builders, Inc. Rezone 4200 Block of N.E. 5th Street File No. R-018-88 Dear Mr. Bennett: The Renton Building and Zoning Department is in receipt of the above referenced application to rezone 1.22 acres of property from 6-1 to R-3 for the future development of 30 multi- family units. The staff of this office has completed an initial review of the application and have determined that in order to endorse a rezone that is in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan, we will need to have a Site Plan Approval Application accompany the rezone application. (Note: The Comprehensive Plan designates the property for "Office Park") The subject rezone request does provide a site plan, but one that is conceptual and without a formal application submittal. In reviewing the site plan as projected for future submittal, we have some suggestions for your consideration. 1. The site arrangement of the buildings are not very interesting and the open space in which they are oriented is a massive open parking lot. Can the appearance be minimized? 2. The project has no real orientation to the street (N.E. 5th Street) as do the surrounding townhouses along the street. For continuity of the streetscape, buildings perhaps should have a stronger connection to the street theme that is already established. 3. Because parking tends to take such a large chunk of available open space, you may want to explore the idea of incorporating parking into the buildings. 4. Again, in creating usable open space, it may be desirable to place all of the site's storm drainage underground rather than in a holding pond. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 April 1, 1988 Page 2 5. The property directly to the east (Windsor Apartments) was recently rezoned. It would be advisable for you to familiarize yourself with this project and understand what conditions were imposed by both the Environmental Review Committee and the Hearing Examiner. It is probable that some of the same conditions may be imposed on this project, i.e., special landscaped setbacks, etc. Finally, to reiterate, the rezone and site plan approval applications should coincide with each other at the initial review time. Separation of the two will only hurt the rezone's potential even though this is an "InFill" rezone request. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact the Zoning staff at 235-2550. Sincerely, €./1.12,1g: Jerry F. Land Use Inspector JFL:sr bENNETT C A March 15, 1988 • City of Renton Building and Zoning Department Municipal Building Renton, Washington RE: Heritage Forest Apartments A Planned 28 Unit Apartment Community Renton, Washington Enclosed please find the following documents: One (1) original, plus six (6) copies of a complete notorized application • One (1) original plus six (6) copies of the • environmental checklist form Filing Fee - Rezone Fee $320 Environmental Checklist Fee 119 $439 Two (2) copies of Certificate from Title Company Seven (7) copies of King County Assessor Map Seven (7)' copies of Site Plan One (1) separate reduction of Site Plan Seven (7) copies of Justification for Rezone Feel free to call if you have any questions or if further . information is required . Sincerely, Todd R. Bennett . President Enclosures CITY CF RENTC;J !: ^ TRB/kn/63RENBZD eA E. JUN 2 21988 . BthLDIN6~zoNING DEPT. • - 5729 Lake View Drive • Kirkland. WA 98033 • (206) 827.7436 r4 i NN!TT cpoup . March 15, 1988 City of Renton Building and Zoning Department Municipal Building - Renton, Washington RE: Heritage Forest Apartments A Planned 30 .Unit Apartment Community Renton, Washington Enclosed please find the following documents : One (1) original, plus six (6) copies of a complete notorized application One (1) original plus six (6) copies of the • environmental checklist form Filing Fee - Rezone. Fee $320 Environmental Checklist Fee 119 $4 3_9 Two (2) copies of Certificate from Title Company Seven (7) copies of King County Assessor Map Seven (7) copies of Site Plan One (1) separate reduction of Site Plan Seven (7) copies of Justification for Rezone Feel free to call if you have any questions or if further information is required . SJy ,rely, d�sident. Bennett Pre Enclosures TRB/kn/63RENBZD , CITY CF RENTON PECEIVFD MAR 1 U 1gsg BUILDING/ZONING DEFT 5729 Lake View Drive • Kirkland, WA 98033 • (206) 827-7436 tifvY. o • ' ITY OF RENTC"T FILE NO(S): R t`�I&-88 C.) oh ez, B.�._DING & ZONING DEPARTL�.1T c-F-ol E-8 S (::(1l1:::"It' ASTERAPPLICATION - . ' N NOTE TO APPLICANT: Since this is a comprehensive application form, only those items related to your specific type of application(s) are to be completed._ (Please print or type. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) APPLICANT 1ITYPE OF APPLICATION NAME - FEES Bennett Community Builders, Inc. al REZONE*(FROM G-1 TO R-3 ) `�j2(�°ar ADDRESS 5729 Lakeview Drive SPECIAL PERMIT* CITY ZIP TEMPORARY PERMIT* - Kirkland, WA 98033 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT* TELEPHONE D SITE PLAN APPROVAL 0 SPECIAL PERMIT FOR GRADE AND FILL (206) 827-7436 No. of Cubic Yards: CONTACT PERSON Q VARIANCE* . From Section: NAME * Justification Required Todd R. Benneti ADDRESS SUBDIVISIONS: 5729 Lakeview Drive E] SHORT PLAT CITY ZIP Q TENTATIVE PLAT Kirkland, WA 98033 Q PRELIMINARY PLAT TELEPHONE Q FINAL PLAT . (206) 827-7436 1".::3 WAIVER (Justification'Required) OWNER NO. OF LOTS: NAME Leslie Danner PLAT NAME: Edwin and Linda Ferkingstad ' . ADDRESS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: • /243 it, cj,C, 77y d 5 i Q PRELIMINARY CITY ZIP E FINAL 4-$1 tea S LI `Ro sj t . TELEPHONE P.U.D. NAME; ' ,zA) 6 5- 8 19 Q Residential Q Industrial 0 Commercial D Mixed LOCATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: PROPERTY ADDRESS • /f 2oo tiocK c/nF , q�\Je N aft.c . Q TENTATIVE EXISTING USE PRESENT ZONING PRELIMINARY FINAL None • G-1 PROPOSED USE. PARK NAME: R-3 NUMBER OF SPACES: It ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE I11 a® SQ. FT. ACRES '-W .j� /y AREA: 53, 143 • ' I 1. 22 \� ,j rif T� 201 V TOTAL FEES 439 . 00 v..-'e" f A7,Fari STAFF USE ONLY -- ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING DATE STAMP'-, �a E V�Li 1 I� r APPLICATION RECEIVED BY: . APPL CATION DETERMINED TO BE: -- - ivihR �. -- �.,' I988 Accepted „; .' r•. � C._F , OF', 0 Incomplete' Notification Sent On ` " . By: • r ",, (initials) DATE ROUTED ADDITIONAL MATERIAL RECEIVED BY: APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: „ ""' Q®® 0 Accepted ® Incomplete Notification Sent On By: (Initials) ROUTED TO: A IA Building WI Design Eng. L! Fire MI Parks / , Oh Police WI Policy Dev. r. lj Traffic Eng. 10 Utilities REVISED 1-31-84 Legal description of property (if more space is required, attach a separate sheet). The east 268 feet of the south 198 feet of the north 629 feet of .__._ the northwest 1/4 of the southwest 1/4 of the southwest 1/4 of Section 10, Township 23 north . range 5 east W.M. ; Situate in the City of Renton., County of King, State of Washington. AFFIDAVIT • I, .4e 5/1 P ,, N P .1 being duly sworn, declare that I am authorized representative to act for the property owner,Cglowner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS /'((J% DAY OF 73'1aA,e1 , 19gd . NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF /^Aie' WASHINGTON, RESIDING AT )(1141/11rffir/ (Name of Notary Public) (Signature of Owner) 3h06 S e1 '14 �S a Leis iZE -y 9 ' 5 77 SA (Address) (Address) `h', el 1 C/r ...._ 9Y0 SG' • .=(City) (State) (Zip) 20 6 ?__q s i/8 i 9 (Telephone) Acceptance of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete application. Plans and other materials required to constitute a complete application are listed in the "Application Procedure." Form #174 ary PSe"'• ENtpN bENNETT GQOU r ,988 • ""vivt, REZONE APPLICATION HERITAGE FOREST APARTMENTS JUSTIFICATION FOR REZONE The subject property is located 400 ' east of the inter- section of Union Avenue N.E. and N.E. 5th Street. Just to the south is N.E. 4th Street which is a major east-west • roadway with commercial development along both sides. The specific parcel is in a neighborhood which is predominantly residential in character with multi-family development on three of its four boundaries . The specific parcel is currently zoned G-1 (General • Commercial) and the comprehensive plan designates the preferred use as Business Office Park ., We believe that the property should be re-zoned down to the level of R-3 (Multi- Family Medium Density) and this action can be justified for . the following reasons: 1) In-Fill Zoning - Three of the four properties which border the site are currently zoned R-3 and contain multi-family development. The fourth parcel adjacent to the south is zoned B-1, but its access is from N.E. 4th Street and its neighbors are the commercially developed properties that front along N.E. 4th Street. The subject property is a classic example of the in-fill re-zone of a parcel to _ - complete a homogeneous group of properties with common use and common access . 2) Compatibility of Use - Currently all the properties which front on N.E. Ath Street are zoned R-3 including the recent rezone of the westerly portion of the new. Windsor Place apartment project. The exception is the subject parcel. A rezone of the subject property from G-1 to R-3 wouldcomplete a nice residential environment on N.E. 4th Street and insure a compatibility of all adjacent neighborhood uses . 3) Conflict of Designated Use - The present comprehensive plan recommends Business Office -Park as the preferred use in the existing G-1 zoning . Since all other uses on N.E. 5th Street are residential and the subject parcel has access- only from N.E. 5th Street, a conflict of use would be created by a Business-Office Park development under existing zoning. Business vehicle traffic which 5729 Lake View Drive • Kirkland, WA 98033 • (206) 827-7436 •S fE-, ' • could include delivery type trucks and vans, and continuous daily vehicle trips associated with business activity would be disruptive to the quiet residential atmosphere of N.E. 5th Street. In addition, the commercial character of office type buildings would be visually incompatible with the character and charm of neighborhood residential architecture. In summary, we feel there are at least three reasons that would substantiate rezone of the property to R-3 from the present G-1 zoning. In addition, we were unable to formulate any strong positions to support any benefits either visual or economic to develop the property as the existing G-1 zoning recommends . The subject parcel is an "orphaned" commercial property with no connection or access to neighborhood business development and should be re-united with its adjacent "residential family" . 63\HFRP FOfsM-NO:W3 AK-142 • Transamerica Title Insurance Company Washington and Alaska Commitment—1986 V _ City COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE " R�NTON ISSUED BY freet eV TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY �"'Q/?o �'988 A. Q oFAv.! • I Transamerica Title Insurance Company, a California corporation, herein called the Company, for a valuable consideration, hereby commits to issue its policy or policies of title insurance, as i identified in Schedule A, in favor of the proposed insured named in Schedule A, as owner or r� mortgagee of the estate or interest covered hereby in the land described or referred to in Schedule A, upon payment of the premiums and chargestherefor; all subject to the exceptions and conditions and stipulations shown herein, the Exclusions from Coverage, the Schedule B V ; exceptions, and the conditions and stipulations of the policy or policies requested. (See reverse i side of this cover and inside of back cover for printed Exclusions from Coverage and Schedule B exceptions contained in various policy forms.) This Commitment shall be effective only when the identity of the proposed Insured and the amount of the policy or policies committed for have been inserted in Schedule A hereof by the Company, either at the time of the issuance of this Commitment or by subsequent endorsements and is subject to the Conditions and Stipulations on the back of this cover. = This Commitment is preliminary to the issuance of such policy or policies of title insurance and all • liability and obligations hereunder shall cease and terminate six months after the effective date , hereof or when the policy or policies committed for shall issue, whichever first occurs, provided that the failure to issue such policy or policies is not the fault of the Company. IN WITNESS WHEREOF Transamerica Title Insurance Company has caused its corporate name and seal to'be hereunto affixed by its duly authorized officers on the date shown in Schedule A. NOTE:THE POLICY COMMITTED FOR MAY BE EXAMINED BY INQUIRY AT THE OFFICE WHICH ISSUED THE COMMITMENT,AND A SPECIMEN COPY OF THE POLICY FORM (OR FORMS) REFERRED TO IN THIS COMMITMENT WILL BE FURNISHED . PROMPTLY UPON REQUEST. V J Transamerica Title Insurance Company . " '@\`\tE Soiy By 1= "• +-7' President I yr y By � -'�+s,v,a Secretary >'.`'. .. c.744k fey ..s5y,L'"._'.?t�uui" `5..��nti_�`L_w! ._..td,�....si ,�._ s,�'-....i`'.n i...•, i�+5.'5+�`.3G:: `"twl;.. _�i.x....__i..i_'_•_:_.:x.:.._,:1 a..�•,__.........�_.`x_t....�_- COMMITMENT CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS 1. The term mortgage,when used herein, shall include deed of trust, trust deed, or other security instrument. -2. If the proposed insured has or acquires actual knowledge of any defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter affecting the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment other than those shown in Schedule B hereof, and shall fail to disclose such knowledge to the Company in writing, the Company shall be relieved from liability for any loss or damage resulting from any act of reliance hereon to the extent the Company is prejudiced by failure to so disclose such knowledge. If the proposed insured shall disclose such knowledge to the Company, or if the Company otherwise acquires actual knowledge of any such defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter,the Company at its option may amend Schedule B of this Commitment accordingly, but such amendment shall not relieve the Company from liability previously incurred pursuant to paragraph 3 of these Conditions and Stipulations. 3. Liability of the Company under this Commitment shall be only to the named proposed insured and such parties included under the definition of insured in the form of policy or policies committed for and only for actual loss incurred in reliance hereon in undertaking in good faith, (a) to comply with the requirements hereof, or (b) to eliminate exceptions shown in Schedule B, or(c)to acquire or create the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. In no event shall such liability exceed the amount stated in Schedule A for the policy or policies committed for and such liability is subject to the insuring provisions, the Conditions and Stipu- lations, and the Exclusions from Coverage of the form of policy or policies committed for in favor of the proposed insured which are hereby incorporated by reference and are made a part of this Commitment except as expressly modified herein. 4. Any action or actions or rights of action that the proposed insured may have or may bring against the Company arising out of the status of the title to the estate or interest or the status of the mortgage thereon covered by this . Commitment must be based on and are subject to the provisions of this Commitment. SCHEDULE OF EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy Appearing in ALTA Owners Policy—Form B- Appearing in ALTA Loan Policy'-1970 1.Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including 1.Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including . but not limited to building and zoning ordinances)restricting but not limited to building and zoning ordinances)restricting or regulating or prohibiting the occupancy, use or enjoy- or regulating or prohibiting the occupancy, use or enjoy- ment of the land,or regulating the character,dimensions or ment of the land,or regulating the character,dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land, or prohibiting a separation in ownership or a re- the land, or prohibiting a separation in ownership or a re- duction in the dimensions or area of the land,or the effect duction in the dimensions or area of the land, or the effect of any violation of any such law,ordinance or governmental of any violation of any such law,ordinance or governmental regulation. regulation. 2.Rights of eminent domain or governmental rights of police 2.Rights of eminent domain or governmental rights of police power unless notice of the exercise of such rights appears power unless notice of the exercise of such rights appears in the public records at Date of Policy. ' in the public records at Date of Policy. 3.Defects,liens,encumbrances,adverse claims,or other mat- 3.Defects,liens,encumbrances,adverse claims,or other mat- ters (a) created, suffered, assumed or agreed,to by the . ters (a) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant; (b) not known to the Company and not insured claimant; (b) not known to the Company and not shown by the public records but known to the insured shown by the public records but known to the insured claimant either at Date of Policy or at the date such claimant claimant either at Date of Policy or at the date such claimant acquired an estate or interest insured by this policy and not acquired an estate or interest insured by this policy or acquired the insured mortgage and not disclosed in writing by the insured claimant to the Company prior to the date such insured claimant became an insured hereunder; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (except to the extent insurance is afforded herein as to any statutory lien for labor or material or right thereto). 4.Unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage because of failure of the insured at Date of Policy or of any subse- quent owner of the indebtedness to comply with applicable disclosed in writing by the insured claimant to the Company "doing business" laws of the state in which the land is prior to the date such insured claimant became an insured situated. hereunder;(c)resulting in no loss or damage to the insured - i claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy; or (e) resulting in loss or damage which would not, • . have been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value Continued on Inside Back Cover for the estate or interest insured by this policy. PLEASE DIRECT CORRESPONDENCE TO: Transamerica No. : 0856525 Transamerica Title Insurance Co. Customer No. : 721669 320 108th Avenue N.E. Seller : Donner/Frkngstad Bellevue, WA 98004 Buyer/ orr wer --- - Prepared for: TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE CO. By 320 108TH AVENUE N.E. Title Officer BELLEVUE, WA 98004 ATTN: BRENDA For service on this order, call: cww ing5gPrE 451-7322 ROBERT L. IVERSON or ANNE ROBERTS P.PLA-)- .. SCHEDULE A SECOND COMMITMENT EFFECTIVE DATE: February 11 , 1988 at 8:00 A.M. 1. Policy or policies to be issued: Amount (X) Alta Owner's Policy (6-1-87) See Note 1 Premium ( ) Alta Owner's Policy-1970 Tax (Amended 10-17-70) Standard Policy , Proposed Insured: - TO BE DETERMINED Total - 2. Title to fee simple estate or interest in said land is at the effective date hereof vested in: EDWIN A. FERKINGSTAD AND LINDA C. FERKINGSTAD, HUSBAND. AND WIFE, AS TO AN UNDIVIDED 1/7TH INTEREST; AND LESLIE A. DONNER, AS HIS SEPARATE ESTATE, AS TO THE REMAINDER V 3. The land referred to in this commitment is situated in the County of King, State of Washington and is described as follows: THE EAST 268 FEET OF THE SOUTH 198 FEET OF THE NORTH 629 FEET OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST W.M. ; SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. SCHEDULE B EXCEPTIONS: Schedule B of the policy or policies to be issued will- contain exceptions to the following matters unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company. A. Standard exceptions set forth on inside back cover. B. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent . to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires for value of record the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. C. Instruments necessary to create the estate or interest to be properly executed, delivered and duly filed for record. 1. Real Estate Excise Tax pursuant to the authority of RCW Chapter 82.45 and subsequent amendments thereto. As of the date herein, the tax rate for said property is .0159. 2. General taxes, as follows, together with interest, penalty and statutory foreclosure costs, if any, after delinquency: (1st half delinquent on May 1; 2nd half delinquent on November 1) TAX ACCOUNT NO. YEAR AMOUNT BILLED AMOUNT PAID PRINCIPAL BALANCE 102305-9329-01 1988 $395.74 $ .00 $395.74 The levy code for the property herein described is 2100 for 1988. PAGE 2 0856525 NOTE 1: • The Company may have further requirements if the amount to be insured exceeds the current assessed valuation. - NOTE 2: Assessed Valuation: Land $31,500.00 Improvements --- • END OF EXCEPTIONS ENCLOSURES: Sketch AR/mb cc: Les Donner 12849 S.E. 72nd Street Renton, WA 98056 • • PAGE 3 0856525 /e WASHINGTON AND ALASKA COMMITMENT-ALTA 1987 SUPPLEMENT " AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION LOAN POLICY(6-1-87) -- and "" AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION LEASEHOLD LOAN POLICY(6-1-87) EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE he following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company wilt not pay loss or damage,costs, torneys'fees or expenses which arise by reason of: (a)Any law,ordinance or governmental regulation(including but not limited to building and zoning laws,ordinances,or regulations) restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating to(i)the occupancy,use,or enjoyment of the land;Zii)the character,dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land;(iii)a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part;or(iv)environmental protection,or the effect of any violation of these laws,ordinances or governmental regulations,except to the extent that a notice,of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect,lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. ' , (b)Any governmental police power not excluded by(a)above,except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice of a defect,lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. . , Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy,but not excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser ' for value without knowledge. , Defects, liens,encumbrances,adverse claims or other matters: :(a)'created,suffered,assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant; (b)not known to the Company,not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy,but known to the insured claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this policy; (c)resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; . (d)attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy(except to the extent that this policy insures the priority of the.lien of the insured: • - mortgage over any statutory lien for services, labor or material);or • (e)resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant-had paid value for the insured mortgage. ."Unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage because of the inability or failure of the insured at Date of Policy,or the inability ' :: : 'or failure of any subsequent Owner of the indebtedness,to comply with applicable doing business laws of the state in which the land is situated. . Invalidity or unenforceability of the,lien of the insured mortgage,or claim thereof,which'arises out of the transaction evidenced by ." : ' Ithe insured mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit protection or truth in lending"Iaw r-,,,° :'__ _,, r::.,': . :Any statutory lien for services, labor or materials(or the claim of priority of any statutory,liien`for services;labor or,materials over'-:;p_,; ' ,,the lien Of the insured mortgage)arising from an improvement or work related to the land_,which;is contracted for and:commenced;",`.a '_subsequent to Date of Policy and is not financed in whole or in.part by proceeds of the indebtedness secured by the:insured mortgage:',:' :A., :=which at-Date of Policy the insured has advanced or-•is'obli ated to advance. ;3,'<r :'. 'A>-' :,,; y.' l ` 1• 1' l.. aji�•. Ji'vi h v - b„Y +4 RI .y �AME CAN LAND TITLE L ASSOCIATION OWNER'S'POLICY'�6;1=8T �•?•_' ;,: : • AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION LEASEHOLD OWNER7S'POLICY.(6-1-87) :.; 'r ' :F`::':,. '-,.i:',';;.: _EXCLUSION S FROM COVERAGE - - v.' he following matters are'expressly excluded from the coverage'of this policy and the Company will not:pay loss'or damage,costs, '-',J.",',w ttorneys'.fees or expenses which arise by reason of: . . .• ' , • , ;.,,• r', ;, - (a)Any law ordinance or governmental regulation(including but not limited to building andzoning laws,ordinances,or regulations) .; restricting,regulating,prohibiting or relating to(i)the occupancy,use,or enjoyment of the land;(ii)the character,dimensions or , location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land;(iii)a separation,in ownership or a change'in the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part;or(iv)environmental protection,or the effect of any violation of these laws,ordinances or governmental regulations,except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a'defect,lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. - - . _ (b)Any governmental police power not excluded by(a)above,except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice of a defect,lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. - - Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy,but not excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge. ' - ' ..Defects, liens,encumbrances,adverse claims or other matters: , : ' (a)created,suffered,assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant; •(b)not known to the Company,not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy,but known to the insured'claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this policy; (c)resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; V (d)attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy;or - (e)resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value for the estate or interest insured by this policy. ' he above policy forms may be issued to afford either Standard Coverage or Extended Coverage. In addition to the above Exclusions om Coverage,the Exceptions from Coverage in a Standard Coverage policy will also include the following General Exceptions: (Continued on Reverse Side) - • WASHINGTON AND ALASKA COMMITMENT-SUPPLEMENT(CONTINUED) • SCHEDULE B GENERAL EXCEPTIONS APPEARING IN ALTA STANDARD OWNERS POLICY - 1. Encroachments or questions of location, boundary and area,which an accurate survey may disclose. 2. Public or private easements,streets,roads,alleys or highways,unless disclosed of record by recorded plat or'conveyance,or decree of a court of record. 3. Rights or claims of persons.in possession,or claiming to be in possession, not disclosed by the:public records. 4. Material or labor liens, or liens under the Workmen's Compensation Act not disclosed by the public records. 5.Water rights or matters relating thereto.. 6.'Any service,installation or construction charges for sewer,water,electricity,or garbage removal. • 7. Mining claims,reservations or exceptions in Patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof. 8.General taxes"not now payable;matters relating to special assessments and special levies,if any,preceding the same becoming a lien. 9. Right of use,control or regulation by the United States of America, in the exercise of powers over navigation. 0. Any prohibition of or limitation Of the use,occupancy or improvement of the land resulting from the rights of the public or riparian owners to use any portion which is now or has been formerly covered by water. - SCHEDULE B GENERAL EXCEPTIONS APPEARING IN ALTA OWNERS POLICY F. Underground easements,servitudes or installations of which no notice is of record. ' - - !:Water,rights or matters relating thereto. • 1- Mining claims, reservations or exceptions in Patents or.in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof. 1. Right of use,control or regulation by the United States of America in the exercise of powers over navigation. i.General taxes not now payable; matters relating to special assessments and special levies,if any, preceding the same becoming :' a lien. " . - ° • q:a as p 'tea°..•, - - -ti- �T; rv.. - • • • • u No-W-AK-142.A imitment Supplement 4 Policies(6-1-87) ... SCH__JLE B GENERAL EXCEPTIONS - • Appearing in ALTA Standard Owners'Policy-Form B 1.Encroachments or questions of location,boundary and area,which an accurate survey may disclose. • 2.Public or private easements,streets, roads, alleys or highways, unless disclosed of record by recorded plat or conveyance, or decree of a court of record. , 3.Rights or claims of persons in possession,or claiming to be in possession, not disclosed by the public records. 4.Material or labor liens,or liens under the Workmen's Compensation Act not disclosed by the public records. ` 5:Water rights or matters relating thereto. .- . 6.Any service, installation or construction charges for sewer,water,electricity,or garbage removal. . : 7.Mining claims,reservations or exceptions in Patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof. 8.General taxes not now payable; matters relating to special assessments and special levies, if any, preceding the same . _- becoming a lien: . , . _ . 9.Right of use,control or regulation by the United States of America,in the exercise of powers over navigation. ,,10.Any prohibition of or limitation of the use,-occupancy or improvement of the land resulting from the rights of the public or: riparian owners to use any portion which is now or has been formerly covered by water. SCHEDULE B GENERAL EXCEPTIONS . Appearing in ALTA Owners'Policy-Form'B ' 1.Underground easements,servitudes or installations of which no notice is of record. . ' 2.Water rights or matters.relating thereto. : , •- . `:3.Mining claims,reservations or exceptions in Patents_or in Acts authorizing the,issuance thereof. ' r- ... '. . 4.Right of use,control or regulation,by the United States.of America in the exercise of powers over navigation.: . .','. .' y--;>,;5.General taxes not now payable; matters relating to special.assessments and special levies,if'any'preceding the.,same,{; ; i„-. becoming a lien. .. ,.:' 4 f' ;9 w ;i.:,:: : '';';:",',SCHEDULE - ,'-�G, �'B� _4:: • GENERAL EXCEPTION �•� +5, t e" `' �A� tt i nStandard-Loan P Poll*: �'.f='s - pP o c" - • :.ti�: • 'err _ _ Taxes or taxingassessments_which'are not shownas existing liensby the recordsofany .authori•Y`that'leviestaxesorassessmen�•"'• ' X iyassessments on real property or by the public„records. • • ',;; - ;' Proceedings by a public agency which.may result,in taxes or assessments,or notices'Of such~prroceedings,whether ornot shown'•'-.', :by the records of such agency or by the public records. .,; - t ,:<' _- °: , :.�rti';T'-%�:'_'is^ '. .. - :..: .. .. 2.Any facts,rights,interests or claims which are not'shown by the:public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection. ,`.•:of the land or by making inquiry of persons in'possession thereof. • . 3.Easements, liens or encumbrances,or claims thereof;which are not shown by the public;records. , , 4.Discrepancies,conflicts in boundary lines,shortage in area, encroachments, or any other facts which;a correct survey would disclose,and which are not shown by the public records. 5.(a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c)water rights,claims or title to water. ' . . . 6.Any right,title,interest,estate or easement in land beyond the lines of the area specifically described or referred to in Schedule A, or in abutting streets, roads, avenues, alleys, lanes, ways or waterways, but nothing in this paragraph shall modify or limit the extent to which the ordinary right of;an abutting owner for access to a physically open street or highway is insured by ':, this policy. 7.Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building and zoning ordinances) restricting or regulating or prohibiting the occupancy,use or enjoyment of the land,or regulating the character,dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land,or prohibiting a separation in ownership or a reduction in the dimensions or - area of the land,or the effect of any violation of any such law,ordinance or governmental regulation. 8.Rights of eminent domain or governmental rights of police power unless notice of the exercise of such rights appears in the public records. • :9.Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other matters (a) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant;(b)not shown by the public records and not otherwise excluded from coverage but known to the insured claimant either at Date of Policy or at the date such claimant acquired an estate or interest insured by this policy or acquired the insured , mortgage and not disclosed in writing by the insured claimant to the Company prior to the date such insured claimant became an insured hereunder;(c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; (d)attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy;or(e)'resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant had been a purchaser or encumbrancer for value without knowledge. _ 4, ECF: h F-of F3-ao I LU: t$ ( z City of Renton asIL ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 011-E0 SEP.T - Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43,21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for allproposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether. the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impacts. Use of Checklist for Nonproject Proposals: (Please Type or Print Legibly) Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Heritage Forest Apartments 2. Name of applicant: Bennett Community Builders, Inc. 3. Andress and phone number of applicant and contact person: Todd R. Bennett 5729 Lakeview Drive Kirkland, WA 98033 (206) 827-7436 • 4. Date checklist prepared: March 15, 1988 S. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): The owner' s intend to start construction no later than Nov. 1, 1988 . The project is not proposed to be phased at this time. CITY OF RENTON 13U1LDING/ZONel G DEFT. y 7. Do you have any for future additions, expansions, further activity related . f: to or connected with this proposal? if yes, explain. No. B. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Soils Report • 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No. 10. List any governmental approvals or permits.-that,will be needed for your proposal, if known. The proposal will require site Plan approval as well as a re-Zone of approximately 1. 22 acres currently zoned G-l. 11. . Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. The project consists of approximately 28 multi-family dwellings, consisting of two bedroom units. The site encompasses approximately 1. 22 acres. This project 'will have a propose( density of approximately 23 units per acre. • 12,. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). ' Provide a legal description, site plan; vicinity map, and topography map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The project lies within section 10, township 23 north, range 5 east, W.M. The site is comprised of 1' parcel approximately 1.22 acre. The project lies north of NE 4th street, is bounded on the east by unimproved property, and lies approximately 400 feet from Union Avenue N.E. Northeast 5th Street is improved to the northly boundary of the site. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one); f1a , rolling, illy, steep slopes, mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent-slope)? - 10% c. What general types of soils are found on the site-(for example, caly,-•sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of-agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Soils report to be completed. . d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. - - - - . None. - 2 - 1 e. Describe the pose, type, and approximate qua, ::ies of any filling or " • , grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. It is our intention to balance cuts and fills. Approximately 1, 000 c.y. of material will be affected. Should fills be required under buildings they will be subject to the approval of the City of Renton and Soils Engineer. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. No. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Approximately.0 % h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Temporary erosion control measures will be utilized during construction of the project, subject to the approval and recom-._a mendations of the,-City of Renton. Long term erosion. impacts are not anticipated.. • 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Exhaust emissions from automobiles and construction equipment during construction is anticipated. The completed project will have automobile exhaust emissions con- sistent with this type of development. b. Are there any off-site sources of emission? None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: • During periods of dry weather water will be applied to the roads in the surrounding bare areas to prevent the dust particles from becoming air-born. 3. WATER a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No. • 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters?-If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. N/A - 3 - • 4) Will the pr_, _sal require surface water withdrL__is or diversions? Give . general description, purpose, and approximately quantities if known. • No. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and appaoximately quantities if known. Basement foundation drains may withdraw some groundwater, quantities unknown. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals . . .; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. N/A c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Storn water runoff from roofs, parking areas, and other impervious surfaces will be collected in a detention pond and released at a prescribed rate in conformance with the City of Renton standards. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No. - 4 - . d. Proposed me 'es to reduce or control surface, i and, and runoff water impacts, if any: Grass lined swales may be proposed in some locations for collecting downspouts and foundation drains. 4. Plants a. Check or circle typed vegetation four. .. the site: 0. deciduous tree: J-•er .'le, aspen,d V evergreen tree I'cedar pine, other o Shrubs o grass o crop or grain o Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other o water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other • other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Deciduous cottonwoods, alders, and some evergreen species will be removed for roads, buildings and parking areas. Significant stands of fir and cedar will be retained. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Six of 10 existing evergreen trees will be incorporated into passive recreation areas. Landscaping materials such as L._ flowering shrubs and evergreen trees will be used to enhance vegetation. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: Hawk, heron, eagl songbird , other rohi ns Mammals: deer, bear, elk, eaver, other Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other _none b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No - 5 - i-, • d. Proposed m(. _.Ares to preserve or enhance wildlift any: • - Preservation of existing habitat areas. Addition of flowering J shrubs and trees will be utilized to attract .and provide shelter . for wildlife. " • 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electrical heating. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? .If so, generally describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Triple-glazed windows' will be used in the apartment units. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. • None 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Traffic noise from 4th NE - 6 - • . 2) What types < . :levels of noise would be created I 1r associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Noise impacts from construction activities would occur during the hours of 7: 00 .AM to 5: 00 PM on short-term basis . Long-term impacts would occur as a result of traffic to and from the project. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts. if any: Earthen berms and landscaping will reduce the long-term impacts. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Residential b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No c. Describe any structures on the site. None d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Yes, the residence and sheds e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Tract 1 - Zoned G-1 f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Commercial g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 90 j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to/avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None, - 7 - 1. Proposed n . .-;ures to ensure the proposal is co. ,itible with existing and . - projected land uses and plans, if any: The. surrounding__uses are: residential,.-!..c.This:,proposal .generally_ reflects current--uses in the area. • 9.- Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided,' if' any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. 30 , middle. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None 10. Aesthetics • a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. 34 ' max. height to ridge. Exterior materials will be channel and bevel cedar siding. Roofing will be asphalt composition. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: 2 story..,buildings are proposed with no more than 6 units per building. 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Glare will result primarily from exterior glazing. b. Could light or glare from ' the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No, the best of our knowledge. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Light from traffic at night may impact the proposal. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Landscaping and earth berming to black glare from automobiles to low glare type exterior lighting is proposed. - 8 - 1 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Maplewood golf course, Cedar River Park, Coalfield Park, Coulon Beach Park b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: A children°s play area will be provided. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. An existing public right of way. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximately distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many • would the project eliminate? 49 new spaces 0 eliminated d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No - 9 - e. Will the pro.,,}t use (or occur in the immediate :nity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by• the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Not known g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: None 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. The project will have some impact on the need for the following: police protection, fire protection, and schools. These impacts are not expected to be significant. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Provide on site amenities and recreation opportunities, and good management. 16. Utilities a. Ci e utilities curree ailable at the site= _ natural, gas, ater refuse service, elephon anitar sewer, pis system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Electricity - Puget Power Telephone - Pacific Northwest Bell Water - Water District #90 Sewer- City of Renton C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: /cf? /'. (2 Name Printed: Todd R. Bennett - 10 - #176 11-8-84 D. • SUPPLEMENTAL SH FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (This sheet should only be used for actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs. Do not use this sheet for project actions.) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous sutstances; or production of noise? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: - 11 - • • 5. How would the pi - sal be likely to affect land an. )oreline use, including whether it would aiiow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. SIGNATURE r I. the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance'that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: Name Printed: • - 12 - , - . . i - f • • • I s , • • , , , , t (00.2/414.IZ. 1 , __j - i J L i 1 z ,f IMO RIPA157 L - ,P14. • Ar00140 • - ... NI oleicr--11,-tice _1 LI Intr.' i , -......... _____ .... 1 e 4 - 3 i(f 0, &Lc Sib&vim- 411 i A194X45 " —_----_,7 -•'•'-'—'-'••-\r-•-----s.-----. ___ \ ( ~VIVO 411111"111111.111.1.1111.11NIMEMIlal lilt Mc° ' el ----\--- y -- ommilii,„,a PM 1...:*414.10SIMEPi - vim!". -- .-- xna ino. ••• --e•% ,-P .a. ,..44aarrifillafr4Magniiiirearill fl MR, -- Ine(JP91. 0 IVINY02/ ••••••... ,14, s,,. , •, . 1191....ft.ELMIN.11/.71 - ' 2: "..111641M1 PI n.4355..v -....... -...... 111StiR‘ti Anwire442 N li '----" INCoild..--11.11111-151 Pab..--... 1'.it M-4 -• 1111 ._.„..„1.--- ,„''' 4 ' likap g --li war r "m1440110414 el*Iintal Ea , . , \ CA o . - ' Iii mil---• / 111 \ \ \ Or • / \ 111?-405.0\ Ill --). 1 -11;1111, VIVO Iftlil ., z \ \ F4 th 4 -0191° \ oi 11- , ...svi, 44csece 1 111 in '''• I I ,..1 • . :44 fil \ \ *den Pr,G NG 10 I \ \ \ 13 SO } i 1 ..., I I • Iminft ••1 • 11 \ ..N•101 "1 • \ M _J• 41140 I N„Ilki,gEER TorrF illi , \ VIC IN IlY oAr 11 -ecio. 4 ..41 A!inh.... ....r.-.-.4„famm • 10 - ,..•\ , # \. me . µa %aNi.E. Ntili 0 IIIIMEgar ‘-N \ \ ‘ Ant 'Zt11311Eksaa , VI il 1 ._ I , i i ; yia, , MAP . cA .11 -J •:\ en A I l' i • .011 , im .. _:„\„ ., \, ,, k No. . 14....1 IWO La.JDOM11.1Vft 0 I II . I I e riwat.4 I‘ I 1\ 10 Pa wc . .„,,) i• • . ,b‘.. .j - - \ \2„, - ....,, , . ,. .....-- --„,-- --"....C.-. .., --.:1'. 11•UT6-ni 0 3 0 I :-----k I _, • 111117rAir \ \ g g, - 17 11 ...1*-*_---i_...mioritl'iolmir .. \ \4D4 • \ i • W w L_ ' ii1 11 \\\405 • : 3 ... / ____ .. ,..„. _it \ ..\\ \int 1 p14144•4 coo "Th 4>W2 I i 1 VOM •FF 95.0 1 1 1 ,4 \ \ t ..... -,.... ....„. \ \ ‘ I 1 \am t ' \ \ 400 - _,11•._Liglizak 0 2 ZI FF•397.11 • \FF.* 97 : 1 ---... -.. III\ 11 \ \ \ \ \ A I 0 W = 2 i L .... II IS, _Adit ..._ 1._ kwee. .........., •- • VIII L .\ ___jou,. ,_ tiniejilit -sell(' 004 \ I)\ \ \ MI v ed wr.s.hy -A' i I 1/I eftmcg . PROJECT NO --T------ \ \ \ 88-39 4f 1 .uPIDEMAPED, •\ . . . . . . \.., .. ... I I. ...-- 2 .t. 1, \t. % A ZONING MAP . DRAWN BY SUE DATE I . • JUNE 20.19SS I PROJECT DATA BUILDING DATA LATEST REV 1 1) Building A(6 units) -2 units/floor 2425 SP - G-I 164 sr' deck. I . 1) astatine Losing 2) Proposed Mating 2) Building 4(6 units) I 2) Site Area - 1.22 Acton (53,143 6.r.) -3 snits/floor deck. 2404 sr 154 SP I 4) Density Allowed 2) 241;4".1,..:/lt'Tit') .20 Sr SAFEWAY I 4 25 usits/scre - 20 Onit4 ZrrtskIly.Propred - 2$Units decks 144 BP 4) Building D(6 units) 2422 Br CITY CF RENTON 0 .72 unit - 49 Spsces docks 146 SP .- 7) Pa/king Zlet1 - 49 Space.C compa ecs 4 4 16-0 2) Nilding S (6 units) 2909 Sr _I ct sp .-46 x 4 noels. 154 SF stanlard apsces 0 2.-04.20.-04 4 —) Total lapsnieus/Leas- 22,224 Sr(GO%) .) 611°.".6 • Total 2..4,srag - agaiLAT(.04) 4 side 5 RS LT 2240 Sr 7) Asphalt Parking ISISLIZ - 53,142 sr(”ss)0 4ddOS jtri 2 t, IzAr Total Bite Area 4 rACIFIC nNGINEERING COMPANY Total Imp4reloss Ares 32224 SP CIVIL ENGINEERING ANC PLANNING CONSULTANTS 1 ' guluNKIGR:dardISIS 0111,1r." • Ap . - d_ - . .,.. , . I, . ].-.. r •.. S r J ii„,„, ' 600 C NDOMINR;.11ri s If —. .. ...i. 7 i I ig L Mo -"T.,.- 4-7".-;-r- * F t! �-4-MT—t+ _.ti.",-,-.yf `sit. !t t = I -44 0 M y. • r .11(�rt S• a kr� ,:4 • •', 1, J q• c.ttAll i v +� .f 4 t 3.�{�. ,F- v ...� 1-.vs.!. F" 74, • 'l , { +�, y .- Cam".:wY-14't, r •'^# w ftt •.!- �,,N ti,,_•4,.. ., oc i r " 9 �2 Iv; ; .11 ny i^ }• „ .iy i t{* �h'� ' "' +;+ir *Z^ a f," J w'1.,'. arm�iri4 7 et 't S iS➢ x. ilttei.i?T�if . t�} '--•r 0. !.. aY ��7is t�+.� \ �''® -ab'$at ; t r. 'e' ,.acAlc..eY i�i-1 .�A -F ' '' ,' � i r. t �T .�i CX 4:C r r-----i--? ". 77 ,,,,, - Z f N5 > /77- -___ O2 I 50 COND:)I4/ / M IV couk II-OLOG NO.E :CALE:,'m I. \rw H.4 = 1E Him \ 1 �� ! a I %5s w se • L� I Z Ef%w s CO HAZELcll.l Kc'R ! i _ •O o c/D i 0 CC/ O. Sf -_-___ -ff A- -_ 1 .�, •r :/I,.lt E'NYC. (ORY SAN.SEW C 7 III ! M Liq i+c i Q 15 6AN SEWER i Ar N•//'�E•SW - �� LIJ EASEMENT C.. �� I 1 p7 i L/NDEVE LOPELil i-- t. WON 500 CC:VL ,�.i;v,x,,- \ .E.: l s_ �' G�2 GAT 0 v ' Je 7-:. �m. 0 Me I �D SAFEWAY i t + MJ et__ 1 W I - i „ . .. . ' . • _• ik-s.- t1/4..... i F: • n: t• A trry-60 REFITOF1 ,,., ml. RECEIVED - . -- _ JUN 2 2 1988 . . ,.. _ i I . ,...,..„, , , Bu I DING/ZOMM.1 DF.PT. 1 i • , . ,:.,,,,t4;.,,. 6 . :‘,4 pi , .--1 '1— - — - . • .,..,__ . 1 it 1 tile I '---r—: I 11, I q114( r.11 r ..„, . ..---- ".1 G • # - —1-4, . II ri...,c •..... 1 ii. . • •,. tg: •• It* ” ( —\. '''. ' 1' . . ' : V i.= ' ''V. 1.. t ii tik .k... I " ••—.ili ... @ ..._ : '1....—___.- ,.., . b.._ ‘a- -' • 1 11 1, ilr - i • . • • . tti ::,,t_ • , , r ,4, 1. . I I ,‘ • • 11',3;:I 1 ILI • •• gillIMINIMINE EM1111 IPI . ;''! ....,, 1 1< I ,..e..t.1 El _‘• 1 •:„..,.,•• '''''' ..--.. ;I 1.7 . b 474 -74 '; g . • ;?:: 7-- fCri:;11 , . :' . 1 - 1 4 ! -- - •••• In — 1,(sii • ? .. . : ,:::•z i.: t 1 1 et,` —k 1 ,i:i.f...1 ,•• • 0_, ;7 ,I 1 5,fi.-' • "--- mi .,® . • • •• --1 • ., 1 :,.„.,,, •--, 1 '4, -(5 1 f° 1 • . .... 0 i' 1 ...411fr .4_II t; ,1 g ..._____ • • ,.._ immimiim 11 i B 1 fk, mi E ::; i • P , 0 1 ,.f.f....: 1.1 • op g ,E J. _ ,,:...: ._ = 1 1 '.....r, - f • . 4 tiLd' st I -:' idi-.. 1 , ___ _ F,...i — I I .,-;• 111 I — ,—. I 0 i I. , S i 1 r -1= . ON' I - •—• . IIII . It 4 , „,,.. 41 , ., r 1 1 i.;.T.f:1 1 0 it- 3 II ,-... 1_ i 1_1 . ..._ • trk:- . .--r I I 't:' .,1 -1‘, : ri 11 . . i k b. I '-'5•:,:`1 1 1 -''' ' -''' '—' . • I ',:fi; • . I I 11.;";._ • 1. .1=L .--- V. • I .5,.,• I I ''''''. I p-: • ..,__4_,... .... 1 Afie. . , ) It ...A• . 0 c. -;-sit';:-• A • - . 4 .,4'.r• .----.1 — • ,.4.F i • ii ,,,t, 11 i • _ .. 3- II . 1-1 ,5-..,...• AP- ' '—' 40,•• ,__, .,-. 11.•:•.,•,. ._____ [EH , II : ,z.-e,.. .4 , • ' 1 i • i : • T el —I — I -•''' I. • I 1..„--, 1 1 111 • , 7.. . I 1 1 I , . 1 . . . .-- i ••••=_—__.• 1 • 1 —. .1, ,,, - • • • 11 , 1 '.• ' — . --..-i 1 • . - :1 •f :--f.:—.'"T-!"—", . .-. r_o N t,s1-2-,4.sr`r ,1:- ;•.' -...i.. ..k -4. 4 ,J ....g.c.,.-!•`A- -LD••! !'1•71.1 . . 4zEitTrt4TTW4W1-- _ . ... , . . CAHILL DAM 11:•• •. : 1 ..... i• 911;15 II;iiy ,...-1 : .•..f, J k 'LI NiVIS libb •ELLEVUE„::::•••••• •••V MI' tanats7, 1—1 f-'4-: 4 - . ,,„"ri 4,--Eisvw-,- .we. c._---__= WA.1-1N4f re. ,24_(2.0)4.5+- 1.. . .......—.. . :elii.--64-•..!-,edmiz.,.;_1 . .. - .-...—..—— C. . .. I . i , • . . • PLANT SCHEDULE • 'CITY OF IT, ON .r•' -,=..... • • .e..4..S7.g6. •• • MU=®0 B2hfzl,Oeoy.Tb:lakrTNo:iIwss.Ca:a xrsec,ealCrkuarolMas...ateen de c'lV./i llage green, V1B,r6 c:aB.l.cal. BktBB)E;erMIal AtnI R' lKiA]g:2 •. ;.,. N k • • • • .6, - • . WASHINGTON . ,-, . ' LAN r$1""C7155 O Beer ruorum ire.sunset. Rea munset maple t:/.t.cal. Full July 2 2 1988 . AUk.,.. . E... •"14;:xlv. . ] tAr4I.- • 0=70,==.,,,.., 1 3/4.cal. dell B a 11 branches .,..., t-- - O Rhue typhina• Staghorn sumac 'B a B 3 canes Multi-stem .....,-,r..deVtiklING DSP.111/ • • ''..."--NM.171-BillOgda • iiiigigiPigfg%14t". • stern SU PLIDI P4 '''I 1 L''.°1' •5 rIbtmtla e Pince es I vestrus, Scotch pine 6 f t. NI B Bel I branched .11 0.ta an stlt. ............... . ,.,,..„3-.. ...c . Nureery grown not sheared -V.4_ . • . _• I, • ll.......A1 ,./ V.W.M...0 --, •Z 1 . O 9=O:r4eree 21!!2:1.ht. rok=" Ct..a...Steyr.. . . ••.'''. ! "WfaT1141r g t 0 O VaMIcc:=Tt7e/ 5 Cal. harclen ea 21.-24•It. growth . •...k11,14L-2 7-7k.+Fieft,vviits•t.......st 0' in . . ,,,..% 21.-2.1. ormoth Deccvvvs TP4e fg152,104,15 i. °A 0 • • sl-ric.4*DETNL -' --3 Ir...,. ...,,h,.... Center • • . • •• ! (4 .1 O :I?•"'"- .-r . . • • 4.•'.i, ' • ® tanleas raol I I, 5 gal. • . N g „.. . • See specIfiCation• . I • ]=1 Berk Nolen V depth[Spica] (0 goP rf.44C1., I E-I i, (1) Zrerg.nvonn".""' 5 gal. Hardened 21.-24' prosth ! fre-151'1,1', l lc. .... N.E.5th STREET II .... - . ....„ a.-,- eA,_oc.___ / ill —1- 2.\:' IC llik il ‘. ---' — IV — WrA o'•,lial . ... 4...o.s, 212!1:. "'"'"' :Oak. ••4, 1.11t triangular spaclng ni, VIZIL:o%•• t NI / Iiir "-.?"4 ..iiii°21 CO ! r,D S:=:,::%;.11= 4'pots Plant 2 24.co.c. triangular aPacing 4; : tg 7 4, FOF\405 I 01 i 4'pots Plant g 35'o.c. ,pkt44 P' r I/ 4 triangular'Pacing II/' gill1) VIII. Allik:i flg il 54=0,rgMee. EDP. A '"'=-11 I ::1:1 ki, e--Oltetum 69.44() IIF ' co , triangular goading 11F •01 5•16' . 4. I All 03 I . 134 to A Mow • „, 40„ z . , 4.pots Plant Q 24.o.c. . i grTd=o;Vc''''' tcianpUlar opac i OP t,.,4111 FFE 395 * MIIVItik ; FFE 403 anii„ay ' • O Z,V1:21?,`:..,!:""' Lt'li• if.% 'R Pi' ow- 1w"-4 0' ptratr 4 w leggill •N, f 1140 1— cc -: " @ L=T:crgt,., . .2'41.,a ;EcI:kf4e:t:Iinng°Tr'ee7s-to—'remain 56 oa•Il . ‘41Prld010 I11 kP: • • g'lf-.e0.'t6'ii0..•.'. re , Ns'4„.,..,.e_.04.',s IVA, •• 'I -•.11":,:;.,.:,'',`;',•4....'.i'17.4 r'N.4'*t?!illi4„4i°0W t!0..1'P1.A14 .4•.....d6e6,,... E- . 0 ?!2,. . \ ,/ _ :=It . : w . , , i1 • Ft$u• . . 1, 7 I u_ < ocrom a.c.', . • ..OP. .....,,,,.., . ........ .-. ... .,... •. : " gill 01 • 0 b •.•)oop fl•We, lor,m;;01gTelealEx..s.,4 Le.r.aosaiovi s-da-•'':'• '•-•"4111th: ii•nry,,,- lip 4•149. fkrigra70.raz .o.0.2.atf '•-•.•-",..41-.66L05) ,:;,c,t3.7,1.:1,44v I-U U) N /BIB - - • . • / II 4e. JO,: < Z ,- -----"'—--VIKB•lb(.414/305-. qo F • 1 NET ...1 I _.-515—rooroftp corlickx_ ii la bit':15 , C MVO --- B II. 1 III 2 co -Wm 7 FFI 395 4..e D I li Po FFE 397,wo FFE 397.2 g) i116 ' 9,0. FFE 398 FFE 46 0 a • .4mi, ow.1.,Eral mir,m,.. ya mi MOM I 2114 KIII-Wfl isil•..4..414111111POIRLAFAIWASILOIC_Irlrep. O. _ ..Sa...j.I 9 G,, ,,.,, ,.,,,,..1 A.:7,_....;,_4 r.k., _...,, . A 1.113.0. .....T 0 T a 107GA TOP,,,.,, AiP,, A 1 1#iiik I i sa ,.•...NriEWW°..,..., •..4.241 111°A IN Na..19.,1111-•iti •••••411m ire.•1•4/•••,•••••em wa.•.•• ••••••:•ga•zonamdr••••151•1• , , -g•ii•-..-,\•••• W ;,'mum Alii, '':'• '''''','•erik • , 41&eV 01154, N. 0 . . • 2 i 1 N 4 . , . . . • . — • • 1• - . • i i • - l 1 1==i • . • . - • . e . . • ---46, • ., i--,i .. . , . . p,. "gr(„.•1.4 4=. --7. . o I rtottfill Ifire" li .1z1 f • • 1 Fill poger • r-- . .. 41 rwoal •.1-0 ka,opr Pon-ki ,rmai rip. a ttd 1I2....11 , ,,,,,,,.,WAYENni' ' wigili or 144fcr-rrvIt.1444 vootH/-rf.rip.,..,T Nir44 0 vvivil+ - 14 nus.sni44---0 wwill-- --- (iD . • . „...,,,..,....,,,,..,Ld 4. . . - ._- i , - 4•`•;.,1 - .11=.' .. . ' -i 1 '..1, 1.- i - 7 , r- •'-' ---.. ,. -46.40.--...14 . •. ...',, ;.- ,4 -.4,-, ,:-:;;•pr • • • •l• I - i • -4, 0.)„,,N .,, .. ,,,4 ,: 4 ,•• i ,,••,.;.,.._. -:.,,- •••• •• . . , , 41)4..!4!.1 •:-;-•,.:4 ir:=, 4 ::-•,-• '-••• ' '1'.", ' ' t_ ••..:•.1_ ;1,til.,:?:•----" -,-- .-• - I:: .:,, ; - . • 0 111ii ) .t.1 ..t., , •.1:',..r ., 1ii{-';' `, :','4.! .,fi,7.,,V.- . ..., .o .., i i, • g 1 ' • „0.1''..j .1 !aa NI 1 . . ' i. • •. -I' --'1!...'' ., . 1. .:..tt' ,... .2 ,,,Y: sommum .e., . D. . • ... ,,- ,-.-.1:.;'•'.---•••• :••17 . ' ,I _.:.,;,,'5,.- .. • - . e . HIMOre,-V.".6 . 1 =...01.4164, b • • ,:: lai ill • • .1 .• 1.../i;,.....„,......._...........: • 6104•L •• 1 ' - rig 2,41k-gx.r.,..: . III • if, 1,...../_ • .: et - ,,,.. __ • -° Val 00 t5 • . . t - • - j...-_-•araa - : • • • .3 .ng, • a;I — j . .. . .. .1==.•I.., 13 6 . s to.F.,..._ s9 z _ • ::. Ze , I - • 1 • t-- .,.07-" w•-" Lk.. .- • ' - Li :-•Fic.c+41.-- • 7- mzacim c„1. • ' _ : - •algrfritZI) • c ... .,.. .....,... . 711 44-D7ge- i' . . ' - -4-------=1— V -__V* .31r1L-- 111•11•11•111 • e-1 . .. , !I 1 1 I . --4 •. 6,_ - . _ . ._ .,...= I .2a- t 1 i.... A..*, • , 1-14P. .. • I , .,. • 4'...7.1_. _, ..-•-• - '71 14 -• ' C:- i..:. ) t5 .I. •;41 .. 1 ). I •• =1 • H 4t ,trj• a 1 t , --t-tez=::= . .....r.c._.+—_=-1 . • -) i: .,_,..... ._: wy..wr, . . • i, I ,;OW CIILKII I -. . ; k ...3 • + 11. _-___, . ...4....w ....„..,..41,, • i__.___=1 =i-rfic.A.wo-•(SP =I • cet,APFr ofx-r•(Sbi --•• - 14•44Picrn nrnce•Ca). • ., . • • - ____. - - ' • - - .' : .1,4 •:15------Li" • 4.1'41- • a 1 al 0 FANUNGI sPi,r-esa • • __.ver-e-d' • ' - • ri-A : • 0 P" 3 , • — _ — -- 1 rUg/ifTr 1 nl • . N I 111161.- / 11111 - rig" ' pall-rtcyr'11 L _ 1.1111111lMilli bl• L.._, 4'fel.ice• 1 '0 ' I .! Afrbig-lial• 1 1-M-r°11-1- ...,:.%....s...........\,.... -.`' MO fry,- 41411•Nli- I v , 1 4 4 c,•,44.Y i rommommi.A.____. ..., ..._, P*11-11461 , ,-0_1 _ _ :al •••11.1 cAr-rcr-T rAF441F-1,61 .40...,,,* 11 ,1 I . „-_--11--1-- -- .--...... :Mtet• •,<tm. h•bki co 11111111111111111111 ve 31222, I •11211 I utazy fklioNguse• iimi I •m... rill: - • ' '-.,.-.. :•'' '.''''.17.• •-',,,••-:;,?,,,, ::,';',,;, ',•;:::,:n;':"•., ',.:in.=- -:.. 1 • 1 •::,,,,,,,,-;,;, r•••>r.44 OAP& IV** . --.' APO, 1.1;46 dr- . 1-d I • Ilia' ..1...P et.' c,,,,),,,,• bk II i a z_i•bert•Sait YrfraiLit. PQM Difb444••02 pi...wrjohy. PotAbLa P11$4•44f••4, PPYr...•Orr b1,0.1 punAlri6r ® .WIVni . rA.m.471141.1 0 Winn root.1 Iyi.,oinp AuFp C) 5 IT 5 ff-0110 k-F-L-loofc-TKIci-ctOLJTI-F---_-.. 11 'ja=c=ffavx.4.2NIu_i__ Aga-IITfLT r . - i