Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA88-030 IP/ All ,:::...7, ': I � / f. s; — * — Jior.� :/ i i it// 0 40 / / “• 'i/11'4'.' ...:.:::',' ..ft `,ill I/ / :.'c 5 ,. ,_ pO 0 ,,, r `I^,h;1 m :i. :2. 7 ni. �f . ao y.,_ ...,,,,:.ii, ,.:.,.::.:,i;... ...::/03. c.,(sc' 7:- 1 rl O0..,. , ;., ao / o * .,'../.1...:' I ., ,,,,_ ,...._Q,A r.„,,, .:„:„..„ ,/,..,,,,_,.: ,,,, ,,,,,,,., .,:;„ A\ ,,,,,„,..„.„,. , ;„,,. .„,.„. / . ,..„. . ^jl , • .�J ; -i /- 4 .:„ % . Wei A low • _;_,-.:' -- -'r.-CT" fi -/ -,,, ' sf r,,,• \ '' �� '�� -� t per. ' ' 4 :.....cP •2 00 7 141110 0.. e4 :' ? '"tgA r ,r : ' _ •s�' 2w- T s..e.5INE UNION—:. Bu `K COMPANY B DALPAY PLAZA SITE PLAN •10)I2N 9ren,Swe9 SUNSET BOULEVARD VICINITY M A P .p061dS5•1050 S1050 RENTON , WASHINGTON 1-it a4ry J67 NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMI- NATION AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON,WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has reconsidered a Determination of n a ,being first duly sworn on oath states SIGNIFICANCE and reconfirmed its deci- that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the Sion for the following project. J. M. DALPAY, DALPAY REZONE Application for non-project action to rezone 3.02 acres of vacant property from G-1 VALLEY DAILY NEWS (General Use)to B-1 (Business Use). Prop- erty located on the south side of N. E. • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition Sunset Boulevard west of Union Avenue. ECF-030-88;R-030-88. Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week.That said newspapers Further information regarding this action are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six is Department, available in the alBu and Zoning gDepartment, Municipal Building, Renton, months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published Washington,235-2550. in the English language continuallyas dailynewspapers in Kent KingThis determination may be appealed to g the City's Hearing Examiner no later than County,Washington.The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal 5:00 p.m. on July 15, 1988. Any appeal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for must state clearly in writing why the Deter- mination shou be revised and must b6 King County. accompanied by anon--refundable $75.00 filing fee. July 1, The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the Kent Edition R5075 Accct. #51067988 Valley Daily News , Renton Edition X , Auburn Edition , (and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period.The annexed notice a _'uaiic 14otice was published on July 1, 1988 R5075 • The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $16 . 24 Subscribed and sworn to before me this 11 t hday of July 19 II 8 Nota ublic for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, King County, Washington. VDN#87 Revised 11/86 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL LrTERMI- NATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON,WASHINGTON Audrey ,being first duly sworn on oath states The Environmental Review Committee' that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the (ERC) has issued a Determination of SIG- NIFICANCE for the following project: J.M.DALPAY,DALPAY REZONE Application for non-project action rezone VALLEY DAILY NEWS 3.02 acres of vacant property from G-1 (General Use)to B-1 (Business Use). Prop- • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition erty located on the south side of N.E. Sun- set Boulevard, west of Union Avenue. ECF Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week.That said newspapers 030-88;R 030-88 are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six Further information regarding this action is available in the Building and Zoning months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King County,Washington.The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal Department, Municipal Building, aenton, newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for Washington, 50. Agencies, affected tribes and memmbersbers of the public are invit- King County. ed to comment on the scope of the EIS. Comments must be submitted to the City of Rerton by 5:00 p.m.on June 21, 1988. The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the Kent Edition Any appeal of the ERC action must be , Renton Edition X , Auburn Edition , (and not in filed with the Renton Hearing Examiner by 5supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers Publi0shed shed.m.,June 14, 1988. PP g Y Published May 31, 1988 Valley Daily News during the below stated period.The annexed notice a R5057 Acct.#51067 Public Notice was published on May 31 , 1986 R5057 • The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $ 1 u .2 4 Subscribed and sworn to before m this 2..n inlay of June 19 6 8 Not ublic for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, King County, Washington. VDN#87 Revised 11,86 %o ® CITY OF RENTON sal BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director MEMORANDUM DATE : JULY 22 , 1988 TO : CITY CLERK FROM: PLANNING DIVISION)) 1/4 RE : J.M. DALPAY R-030-88 BEING TRANSMITTED TO YOU IS FILE R-030-88 WHICH WAS WITHDRAWN BY THE APPLICANT ON JULY 14, 1988. READY TO BE FILED. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 THE BLAYLOCK COMPANY B specialists in land-use procedures uqr11 OF 1�1rEE41 OIl R.) r4 0 E I V E JUL . r::15 July 14, 1988 Bun.. /ZONING DEFT: Mr. Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator City of Renton Building and Zoning Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 RE: R-030-88 REZONE OF DALPAY PROPERTY LOCATED ON SUNSET BOULEVARD N.E. Dear Mr. Erickson: Our client, Mr. James W. Dalpay, has asked us to withdraw R-030-88 , the application to rezone his property on Sunset Boulevard, N.E. near Union Avenue. At a later date, we hope to submit a different proposal which will be more acceptable to the City. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Sincerely, . .. .->(..( 4._ Rog r J. Blayl ck 71388wdr 10717 NE Fourth Street,Suite 9 • Bellevue,Washington 98004 A (206)455-1550 4i ® CITY i F RENTON "LL BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director • June 30, 1988 Roger Blaylock The Blaylock Company 10717 N.E. Fourth Street Suite 9 Bellevue, WA 98004 Re: Dalpay Rezone Application South of Sunset Blvd. & west of Union Avenue ECF-030-88; R-030-88 Dear Mr. Blaylock: The Environmental Review Committee has reconsidered and has determined that its Determination of Significance for the above referenced project is still appropriate. Although the permitted uses would be substantially limited under your revised proposal other probable significant impacts such as traffic, slopes, and drainage remain and must be addressed. The ERC felt the best way to do this was through a focused E.I.S. This Determination may be appealed to the City's Hearing Examiner no later than 5:00 p.m. on July 15, 1988. Any appeal must state clearly in writing why the Determination should be revised and must be accompanied by a non-refundable $75.00 filing fee. If you have any questions, please call me at 235-2550. Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE/sr cc: J.M. Dalpay 4033 Sunset Blvd. N.E. Renton, WA 98056 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTJ AGENDA June 22, 1988 Third Floor Conference Room Commencing at 10:00 a.m. EW PROJECTS City of Renton, Policy Development-Hazardous Substances Zone Designation Ordinance Development of a Hazardous Substance Zone Designations Ordinance for the purpose of implementing state mandated requirements to allow hazardous waste treatment and storage facilities in zones where the handling and processing of hazardous substances is not prohibited, except residential zones. ECF-046-88 City of Renton, Public Works Department, King County Property Rezone Application to rezone a 36 acre parcel of property from G-1, General Use to P-1, Public Use. This is a non-project, programmatic rezone at the present time. Plans for future use of the site include: 1) the expansion of public works maintenance shops and addition of a Fire Department Training area for the City of Renton and King County; 2) King County District Court; 3) King County Transfer Station; 4) King County Health Department; 5) King County Parks Department. Subject property is a contiguous 36 acre site, including a parcel owned by the City of Renton which is addressed on the 3500 block of N.E. 2nd Street and a parcel owned by King County addressed at Monroe Avenue N.E. R-037-88 DISCUSSION Econo Lube N'Tune ECF-028-88 Letter from Sherwin Lisker, RE: mitigation measures. Dalpay ECF-030-88; R-030-88 Letter from Roger Blaylock regarding proposed limitation of uses for rezone and request for reconsideration. mETRD Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle Exchange Building • 821 Second Ave. • Seattle,WA 98104-1598 June 15, 1988 Environmental Review Committee % Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator City of Renton Department of Building and Zoning 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Determination of Significance File No. : ECF 030-88/R 030-88 J. M. Dalpay Dear Mr. Erickson: Metro staff has reviewed this proposal and anticipates no significant impacts to its wastewater facilities. Metro will provide comments on the Draft EIS. Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment. Sincerely, Gregory M. Bush, Manager Environmental Planning Division GMB:wsg ® EEY OF C E 0 V BUILDING/ZONING V1 r. THE BLAYLOCK COMPANY specialists in land-use procedures CITY OF RENTON JUN141988 June 14, 1988 BUILDING /ZONING DEPT. Mr. Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator City of Renton Building and Zoning Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 RE: REZONE OF DALPAY PROPERTY LOCATED ON SUNSET BOULEVARD N.E. Dear Mr. Erickson: In the interest of mitigating the impacts of the rezone request, I have been asked by my client, Mr. J. W. Dalpay, to formally amend the rezone application to include the following points: 1. Site plan approval for all development exceeding 4,000 sq. ft. This will provide the City with the opportunity to closely monitor the landscaping, including the preservation of natural vegetation. In addition, the process will allow design review of access to Sunset Boulevard. In general, the process will require the sensitive development of the site considering the primary environmental areas of concern: earth, land use, plants, and transportation. 2. The maximum height shall not exceed 35 feet. This is the maximum height allowed in the adjacent R-1 zone. The dramatic reduction in intensity (approximately 64% of the allowable in the B-1 Zone) of the development would drastically reduce the impact to the land and to the transportation system. 10717 NE Fourth Street,Suite 9 • Bellevue,Washington 98004 ® (206)455-1550 Dalpay Rezone June 14, 1988 Page 2 3. The following uses with a potentially significant adverse impact shall be DELETED from the list of permitted uses: (1) Principal Uses: a. Retail Sales: 4. Department and variety stores. 5. Dry goods. 7 . Furniture and home furnishings. c. Services: 1. Auto repair. 2. Boarding and lodging houses. 3. Bus terminals, taxi headquarters. 6. Churches. 8 . Funeral homes. 10. Hotels and motels. 11. Indoor public assembly: Motion picture theaters and theatrical production theaters, sports arenas, auditoriums and exhibition halls. 12. Libraries, museums, art galleries. 14. Parks and open space. 21. Recycling collection centers. (2) Accessory Uses: the following uses are prohibited even where incidental to a permitted use: e. Recycling collection stations. (3) Conditional Uses: The following uses are not permitted even with a conditional use permit. a. Aircraft transportation. heliports. b. Communications broadcast and relay towers. d. Gasoline service stations. f. Heights exceeding 95 ' . h. Hospitals. i. Outdoor recreation or entertainment uses. j . Park and Ride lots. k. Private utilities. m. Rental service facilities with outside storage. n. Self service storage facilities. Dalpay Rezone June 14, 1988 Page 3 The following and similar uses will be retained as PERMITTED USES: ** (1) Principle Uses: a. Retail Sales: 1. Apparel and accessories. 2. Automotive and marine accessories. 3. Auto, boat and motorcycle sales. 6. Eating and drinking establishments. 8. Garden supplies: small trees, shrubs, flowers and light supplies and tools within an enclosed building. 9. Grocery stores. b. Offices: 1. All types of business offices. 2. Personal offices such as real estate, insurance and architects. 3. Professional offices such as lawyers, doctors and dentists. c. Services: 4. Business services: Duplicating and blueprinting, steno and employment. 5. Car washes. 7. Commercial day care. 9. Governmental services and facilities, excluding utility facilities. 13. Parking lots and garages. 15. Personal services such as barber shop, beauty parlor. 16. Pet shop and grooming. 17. Professional and business schools. 18. Rentals services not involving exterior storage. 19. Repair service facilities without outside storage: watch, TV, electrical, upholstery. 20. Veterinary offices. ** The Building and Zoning Department may determine that any other use is similar in general character to the above specific uses per code requirements. Dalpay Rezone June 14, 1988 Page 4 d. Residential: Residential dwelling units when located in a mixed use building of commercial and residential uses. No residential uses allowed on the first floor. e. Hobby kennel. (2) Accessory Uses: Uses allowed where incidental to a permitted use, not to exceed thirty three percent of the gross floor area: a. Apparel, fabric and leather goods fabrication. b. Food preparation. c. Handcrafting products. d. Storage of products in conjunction with retail sales. (3) Conditional Uses: c. Convalescent and nursing homes. e. Group homes. g. Horticultural nurseries: Trees, - shrubs, ground cover, flowers and related supplies . 1. Recycling centers and drop or collection centers. This modification in the rezone application will act as a contract between the property owners and the City of Renton. We further request that the City consider this a modified application and that the Environmental Review Committee reconsider this information and issue a Mitigated Declaration of Non-Significance. Thank you for the opportunity to amend the proposal. Sincerely, RogerC---eerteust97 Blaylock THE BLAYLOCK COMPAN 6-14ERIC.DOC • �,s STATE 0� 4.FFF 4. JERRY NEAL s fix` Interim Director yl 188,TIC) STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE Region Four Office -- 16018 MITI Creek Boulevard, MITI Creek, WA 98012 -- (206) 775-1311 CITY OF RENTON June 14 , 1988 0 � JUN151998 Environmental Review Committee c/o Don Erickson , Zoning Administrator BUILDING / ZONING DEPT. Building and Zoning Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton , Washington 98055 RE : FILE ECF 030-88 ; R 030-88 ; DALPAY PLAZA ; SCOPING NOTICE Dear Mr. Erickson : Stormwater from this site is going to flow into Honey Creek . Honey Creek contains cutthroat trout and is a tributary to May Creek which contains rainbow and cutthroat trout plus coho salmon . However the upper • area of the creek is not in good condition . An EIS should address how the applicant intends to deal with the increased runoff this project will create . Re- tention/detention facilities and bio-filtration should be included in a development plan . Sincerely , THE DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE r Tony Op .ermann Habitat Biologist TO : kh cc : Habitat - Olympia a 3 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 4, day of , 1988, I deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed velope containing documents. This information was sent to: NAME: eg6.6.1. '190 SIGNED BY: fi,, fifen,e6A-Tg-te. SUBS IBED AND SWORN to before me this �, 74 day of ",I._ , 1988. fO;.ON FXA•.(A 4:4 o1ARy N ,A. .,p‘le, korilk) C_ ..e), 0-6 ,a'• G• R' ••\*� Notary Public and for the State of Washington, F Of WASH residing at ik � In%/(.} , therein. Project Name and Number: kel F— 030-kg e. 034-k 16 t$ ''4> CITY OF RENTON "LL ' BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director June 3, 1988 Mr. Roger Blaylock The Blaylock Company 10717 N.E. Fourth Street, Suite #9 Bellevue, Washington 98004 RE: DALPAY REZONE APPLICATION, SOUTH OF SUNSET AND WEST OF UNION AVENUE, (ECF 030-88; R-030-88) Dear Mr. Blaylock: This letter is to inform you that the Environmental Review Committee completed their review of the environmental impacts of the above referenced project on May 25, 1988. On that date the Committee issued a Determination of Significance for the Dalpay Rezone Application because of probable significant adverse impacts in the areas of: earth, land use, plants and transportation. This decision was primarily based upon the fact that the proposed rezone is not congruent with the Comprehensive Plan for the City of Renton. As a result, the subject property was not evaluated for Commercial Use when the Comprehensive Plan was evaluated for its environmental impacts. Therefore no information is available to the City concerning potential impacts from rezoning the property to allow commercial development. The Committee suggested that you might also want to consider submitting a project specific site plan in conjunction with your rezone application so that these impacts could be more easily ascertained at the time the rezone is considered. If you decide to do this, you may want to withdraw your current application. We would appreciate hearing from you at your earliest convenience with respect to the applicant's decision -- whether he elects to continue with this application and develop an Environmental Impact Statement or elects to submit a new, project specific application. If you have any questions or would like clarification concerning the above-referenced matter please contact me or Lenora Blauman of my staff at 235-2550. For the Environmental Review Committee, rji.4) t j./ Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator blaylockltr DKE:lb:sr:cs 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 „ CITY OF RENTON NIL BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director June 2, 1988 Roger Blaylock The Blaylock Company 10717 N.E. Fourth Street, Suite #9 Bellevue, Washington 98004 RE: Dalpay, Rezone Application, South of Sunset and west of Union Avenue, (ECF-030-88; R-030-88) Dear Mr. Blaylock: Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Determination of Significance for the above referenced project. If you have any questions, please call me at 235-2550. Sincerely, Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator pc: J. M. Dalpay 4033 Sunset Boulevard N.E. Renton, Washington 98056 DKE:sr:cs 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the o2 day of , 1988, I deposited in the mails of the United States a sea ed envelope containing &E C documents. This information was sent to: 9s NAME: Roger Blaylock The Blaylock Company 10717 N.E. Fourth Street, Suite #9 Bellevue, Washington 98004 J. M. Dalpay 4033 Sunset Boulevard N.E. Renton, Washington 98056 SIGNED BY: si6v9t.„Ak d SUBSCRIBE AND SWORN to before me this a N p day of , 1988. Ifo*.•pN Exp•.F' i ‘p o4 O-cAR). 2 %N* • pUBV 0) •:` �►► Not lic in andfor t eState of Washington `�� '•• G.vielR; �i residing at 'R 6 , therein. _qlF OF '4 Project Name and Number: Dalpay, Rezone Application, South of Sunset and west of Union Avenue, (ECF-030-88; R-030-88) AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the1vta, . V aedltd, day of , 1988, I deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing documents. This information was sent to: WV s - ; D n's w- OS NAME: Washington State .21r od Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section (o/ii e Mail Stop PV-11 Olympia, WA 98504 • Mr. Gerald W. Marbett Mr. Gregory M. Bush 60 /ta /8 r Department of Wildlife Mr. Joe Robels SIGNED BY: Z2A4_tf .) SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this p2 ,v 0 day of , 1988. fli)147S • -*N. ,sI p�` �oN E,rA'1)�f, v 0 •4 01 AR). .Q �.,` t? ^:••9G� N. c # Notary Public in and or the State of Washington, ; • �'••••••.'' •���� residing at --Qrti7—e , therein. OF VINIS Project Name and Number: Accord, Inc. Taco Time Corporate Offices (ECF-034-88; SA-034-88) Sherwin Lisker, EconoLube & Tune, Inc. (ECF-028-88) J.M. Dalpay, Dalpay Rezone (ECF-030-88; R-030-88) Valley Medical Center, Psychiatric Wing Addition (ECF-027-88; sa-027-88) 0 • BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE. STAFF REPORT May 25, 1988 A. BACKGROUND: APPLICANT: J. M. Dalpay PROJECT: Dalpay Rezone ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF 030-88 ; R 030-88 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for non-project action to rezone 3 . 02 acres of vacant property from G-1 (General Use) to B-1 (Business Use) . LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: South side of N.E. Sunset Boulevard, west of Union Avenue I I 1 I NOR iH 1 1 IL 4 2 : ice+ 1 i d E 17 r.. •/' . _ 2 _._',au+ ,awe,t"" ...1 ^..''MOO ANDS . — I• 11111 ' I•i 11 1 1._LI: 2'It� •• eq a, s.� �o`t'• PnRr, I I 7 .;:, '., ' �.� 1 i 1. I" " i" Ili n} ez /hal}i maw_ Iil". 4' , I I i_h{ IT t„ 51 } 1 1 lam) .__--..--1 77 E 17T" ` 51 r�''1'�1 �/ I - I r . n ^ t . s ., • L+ I I1z!3r4 51C. 7 6,9 10 11 ,2 Is 14 J ( .1 ,r}Lr S I I �- , \ _ _ ' w R-3 s R-2 G 1 , • ,. — R-2 1 R-3} _ :, g- 1 i b'- 1 r 1 NI. ja•a 57 1 R-2 �t /1, `— ' v '1i) G/ `I'7- 1 _ �. �/ N E I Sr 1 1 % r C f1 77MM '_� r I \W , �i''iI �i 1 ,1. I ) r, I t W r �Z �' )o -.I^ N F.�er) —51 T �J I I Z, - z J 1 5 1 1 1 / O ,,.— -rr— I �. 1 1 G-1 - - ——— Z T' ,— 5 7 _. . ti.� /r \ 411_, .„ t--., 1,.,44-1„,z , N. > tir �� NE 11'-[r MI / // 1 �- 1-,....1.A....5,1111-,,. �_ �L t , -1 I It W20LLrI • ri. IIrFI F. ''""''�� I } , l a ,1 17 Q T l T I o . 7 �f ,l., , / � j // S1. I � 1,I,.I,.l" � ` I ' 1 ' e - a 70 NE I111, - 1�� 1+� , `5t"?y ' w „ . i 51 'y l /' l o l I k8,1,01.i s r i. {�?..J1:_. —•^ O111 § 1 \jev/' 3.:,0 6 b V H,4a-.j8 3 L . I „ n, •I'` a s 1 N E. -r _ \r\z o.T r. �/� �, e I N_ E o l l � t N[, t " v `� rsrt.i.,...i., dil, �\q` a_ r T ' f (. i'i, 1 r a 4'- ,r „) '' P-1 )I 'r'1'�1'I r I ' �.- 'a + zl�.. 5.z1�. ss ' z , r oi,ti / .` b\ Ib „� ,. , I I}1 IV+OI =.. Q� 1 le p��a� II _ ti lIr( Ip- P ti,- / t , 11 ll N F ,• - ' _ ,�-c� l '�n,S Ala 1 1 L17;G-1 7 a 9 i' Environmental Re ew Committee Dalpay Rezone May 25, 1988 Page 2 B. BACKGROUND: The applicant is requesting a rezone from G-1, General Use to B-1, Business Use. The Comprehensive Plan Map shows the site as most suitable for Single Family Residential Uses. The zoning appropriate for areas so designated is either the existing G-1 designation or an R-1 designation. C. ISSUES: 1. Whether impacts related to options for future commercial development of the subject property can adequately be assessed in view of the fact that this is a non-project rezone application? Specific environmental impacts from future development of the property cannot be accurately determined due to the non-project, speculative nature of the proposed rezone. Specific project related impacts will be addressed in conjunction with a development proposal for this property.Therefore, for the present environmental evaluation of this application must assume the maximum level of development permissible in the commercial zone. One item of particular concern is that of the need for plans for drainage management system to control on-site drainage and to protect adjacent Honey Creek. 2 . Whether traffic impacts related to the rezone application have been adequately identified and addressed? Because of the location and the configuration of the subject property, it is anticipated that any development will have impacts which could be significant both with respect to sight distance along the Sunset Boulevard access route and with respect to site access. Prior to any site development a roadway sight distance analysis should be required. The major access on Sunset Boulevard should be required to meet minimum I.T.E. standards. Similarly, potential impacts related to the proposed emergency access route along N.E. 12th need to be presented in greater detail in the application materials. 3 . Whether impacts have been adequately evaluated with respect to displacement of potential single family developments and with respect to impacts of anticipated commercial development? The applicant has provided no information relating to the relative impacts of residential development or commercial development for the subject property. It is suggested that such information be obtained from the applicant at this time, in view of the fact that subsequent development of the Environmental Re' :w Committee Dalpay Rezone May 25, 1988 Page 3 property, if it is assumed to be at a maximum level, is anticipated to have significant impacts related to site utilization and related to neighborhood development. 4. Whether future actions on the subject property may be constrained by the Department of Natural Resources as a result of clear cutting undertaken on this property without appropriate conversion permits? Much of the subject property has been cleared without a DNR conversion permit. Under these circumstances, DNR can authorize the City to prohibit the applicant from taking any discretionary action on the property for a maximum of six years. (Citation: RCW 76. 09 . 060 At present there is no information in the application concerning penalties assessed, actions taken or authorities granted by the DNR with respect to the property. It is recommended that information relating to options for DNR/City options in this matter be obtained by the City prior to issuance of a determination for this rezone application. It is recommended that the City ensure that the applicant is enjoined from future clearing of the subject property until an approved site plan is obtained for the parcel. D. RECOMMENDATIONS: The ERC issue a Determination of Significance with respect to this application for the following reasons: 1. The proposed rezone is not congruent with the Comprehensive Plan for the City of Renton. 2. Future commercial development of the property is likely to have significant negative environmental impacts upon the local community as such development is not consistent with site characteristics and not congruent with characteristics of much of the local neighborhood. E. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS: Various City departments have reviewed and commented upon the project. These comments are as follows: Police Department: Environmental: No comments. Fire Prevention Bureau: Environmental: Minor impact. Environmental Re• :w Committee Dalpay Rezone May 25, 1988 Page 4 Design Engineering: Environmental: Access and site distance entering and existing the site are of major concern with these serious problems is the zoning requested appropriate? Is the use of Sunset Blvd N.E. as the primary access appropriate? Traffic Engineerinq: Environmental: Roadway sight distance impact analysis required for site access. access must meet minimum I.T.E. standards. Utility Engineering: Environmental: No comments. • Parks and Recreation: Environmental: No recreation impacts at this time. Building Division: Environmental: No comments. Zoning Division: Environmental : The remaining trees on the property should not be clearcut until a development plan for the site is approved. Future development impacts of property are unknown due to speculative nature of rezone request. Must assume worse case scenario for maximum development that the B-1 zone allows. Policy Development: Environmental: Relative impacts of a commercial vs single family development on drainage particularly Honey Creek should be evaluated. Project site is being cleared without a DNR conversion permit in violation of state law. Penalties could include denial of development proposals for 6 years. Property owner should be required to mitigate damage from clear-cutting activities - exp. relative to Honey Creek. Preliminary traffic analysis estimating AOT from commercial vs single family should be done with a comparison of impacts and a capacity analysis. problems and sight distance should also be evaluated. Environmental Rey sw Committee Dalpay Rezone May 25, 1988 Page 5 Land use impacts of commercial on single family to south are not well evaluated. Displacement land for SF homes. Part of site is classified as "environmentally sensitive" due to presence of greenbelts to W. & N. CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE AND REQUEST FOR COMMENTS ON SCOPE OF EIS FILE NUMBER(S) : ECF 030-88; R 030-88 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for non-project action to rezone 3 . 02 acres of vacant property from G-1 (General Use) to B-1 (Business Use) . PROPONENT: J. M. Dalpay LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: South side of N.E. Sunset Boulevard, west of Union Avenue EIS REQUIRED. The lead agency has determined this proposal is likely to have a significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is required under RCW 43 .21C. 030 (2) (c) and will be prepared. An environmental checklist or other materials indicating likely environmental impacts can be reviewed at our offices. LEAD AGENCY: Environmental Review Committee, City of Renton The lead agency has identified the following areas for discussion in the EIS: Earth, land use, plants and transportation. SCOPING: Agencies, affected tribes, and members of the public are invited to comment on the scope of the EIS. You may comment on alternatives, mitigation measures, probable significant adverse impacts, and licenses or other approvals that may be required. Your comments must be submitted in writing and received before 5: 00 p.m. on June 21, 1988. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee % Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator Building & Zoning Department 200 Mill Avenue S. Renton, WA 98055 APPEAL: You may appeal this determination of significance in writing pursuant to RMC 4-3016 accompanied by a $75. 00 appeal fee no later than 5: 00 p.m. June 14, 1988, to: the Renton Hearing Examiner. Renton Hearing Examiner % City Clerk 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact the above office to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. PUBLICATION DATE: May 31, 1988 DATE OF DECISION: May 25, 1988 SIGNATURES: c'e1497 alL9 _ �i • Ronald G. Ne lson Larr M. Sp' knger Building and Zoning Director Policy Deve •,•ment rirector Richard C. Houghton Public Works Director I NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of SIGNIFICANCE for the following project: J. M. Dalpay, Dalpay Rezone Application for non-project action to rezone 3 . 02 acres of vacant property from G-1 (General Use) to B-1 (Business Use) . Property located on the south side of N.E. Sunset Boulevard, west of Union Avenue. ECF 030- 88 ; R 030-88 Further information regarding this action is available in the Building and Zoning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235- 2550. Agencies, affected tribes and members of the public are invited to comment on the scope of the EIS. Comments must be submitted to the City of Renton by 5: 00 p.m. on June 21, 1988 . Any appeal of the ERC action must be filed with the Renton Hearing Examiner by 5: 00 p.m. , June 14, 1988. Published: May 31, 1988 • N OT E ENVIRONMENTAL % . DECLARATION APPLICATION NO. ECF-030-88, R-030-88 APPLICANT J. M. DALPAY, DAZPAY REZONE PR DNON-PROJECTOPA 4CVTARYT PROP ERTYIFROM G-1FOR USE) TOTB-1 (BUSINESS 3 . 0 • USE) . GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF N.E. SUNSET BOULEVARD, WEST OF UNION AVENUE POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (E.R.C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION 151 DOES DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY JUNE 21 , 1988 AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE faitITIRN 1RING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION. ✓IRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMIT AGENDA May 25, 1988 Third Floor Conference Room Commencing at 10:00 a.m. NEW 1. Sherwin Lisker, EconoLube & Tune, Inc. This project is submitted for environmental review as it is to be sited in the Aquifer Protection Area. The development is to be a 2800 square foot tune-up, lubricating & minor repair center on an existing vacant lot in an L-1 zone. Property located at 225 Sunset Boulevard. ECF-028-88 RECOMMENDATION: DNS-M 2. J. M. Dalpay, Dalpay Rezone Application for non-project action to rezone 3.02 acres of vacant property from G-1 (General Use) to B-1 (Business Use). Property located on the south side of N.E. Sunset Boulevard, west of Union Avenue. ECF 030-88; R 030-88 RECOMMENDATION: DAIS 3. Valley Medical Center, Psychiatric Wing Addition Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of the first story of an eventual three-story building, a 40-bed psychiatric addition having 24,960 sq. ft. A lower level below could have approximately 3,000 sq. ft. of mechanical/electrical room. Located at Valley Medical Center, 400 South 43rd Street. ECF-027-88; SA-027-88 RECOMMENDATION: DNS 4. City of Renton Public Works Department-I-405 Storm Drain Crossing Application to construct storm drain improvements to improve drainage capacity at the I- 405 culvert near N.E. 44th Street. Property located north of I-405 at N.E. 44th Street ECF-031-88 RECOMMENDATION: DEFER, PENDING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 5. City of Renton, Public Works Department-South Talbot Hill Reservoir and Pipeline Improvements Application to rezone approximately two acres of property from R-1 (Residential Use) and Greenbelt to P-1 (Public Use) and to construct a reservoir and a 16 inch water pipeline. The reservoir will be located on Carr Road, east of Valley Medical Center and south of the Covenant Church Building. The watermain will be installed in Carr Road from Valley Medical Center to 103rd Place S.E. and up the reservoir access road (143rd Place S.E.) ECF 021-88; R 021-88; SA 021-88 RECOMMENDATION: DEFER SITE PLAN, PENDING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION; DNS-REZONE F 47 -4-1 �C • 6. Jeffrey Hillson-Beadex Manufacturing Application to construct a single story 8500 square foot metal warehouse to serve as an addition to an existing single story concrete building of approximately 32,000 square feet. The proposed structure will displace parking places which are to be relocated on the site. Property located at 833 Houser Way North (east of the Boeing Company and west of I- 405). ECF 032-88 RECOMMENDATION: DEFER, PENDING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 7. Accord, Inc. - Taco Time Corporate Offices Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of a corporate office building having approximately 12,029 square feet of which 92% will be office and 8% as storage. Property located south of South 2nd Street, east of Rainier Avenue South, and west of Lake Avenue South if extended, 200 Rainier Avenue South. ECF-034-88, SA-034-88 RECOMMENDATION: DNS-M DISCUSSION GOOD SHEPHERD GROUP HOME, OLYMPIA- ECF-015-88 • BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE STAFF REPORT May 25, 1988 A. BACKGROUND: APPLICANT: J. M. Dalpay PROJECT: Dalpay Rezone ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF 030-88 ; R 030-88 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for non-project action to rezone 3 . 02 acres of vacant property from G-1 (General Use) to B-1 (Business Use) . LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: South side of N.E. Sunset Boulevard, west of Union Avenue OR'r � E !,�it ;!fl ' J 1R_31oR-2 G— , , k I. t•r .:r, I — FB17% R-2 1 R 3 5 t ' . '; ;417-114 1., 51 ' 1 1 :O. • . ill .4( R-2 ' I „ T--t } G _ 1 Icy l \ • 7 j ' e C�, 1 7 ,, _f yr i '' Z .} 1 / ,o -l^ wE —,3 �S i �l �jI ry Z5 „ 1z a S s 1 01 -- .1 ..13ttly \ 11 ....- -37 _z 1 G-1 }. --n- —rr— o , W L 1 1 . , 4 , 2 , to E a . 10. . 1 1 I ilb , ,, • _ 2." .., y'_•- 4, \ / „.. . RrdR-3 11 ji: e . , _ _t____ ,. ) • , / 1' 4 SII I 4 7 T-- -- ,L L r •� L W�. NE'II'_CI •r 199 y � ^1` 1 !1.�i, ,t rs. e s 1 TL,1a��� �'"-_ � ,'\,.1 z,e 1 o „ . i 3 I. s !\I /� • _ I '1°4:1"I" ' -7, I • ; ,Of N E ,,„ —5�f' ', ,J s l�jy t r� ,L I uL 1 ! ; : $ .Io I ,� I {-l.'. Olz 9 3 L �- '�Il �1111 IS ® \/// J6 , I N E O'" C t N[ I CC, � 4 a � , 1- ' I rl:"1-i i—� I1 �I'!'I --{�_1kIY I�` S ,,, '- ti;' �. f I l I I14 lo3/� iS b u • 1 , a E ` ll/ \.,6 —. Ir�1 r #�ai.l 1 -I� u L1 ' 1i� 'I I I I 1 Environmental Rev i Committee Dalpay Rezone • May 25, 1988 Page 2 B. BACKGROUND: The applicant is requesting a rezone from G-1, General Use to B-1, Business Use. The Comprehensive Plan Map shows the site as most suitable for Single Family Residential Uses. The zoning appropriate for areas so designated is either the existing G-1 designation or an R-1 designation. C. ISSUES: 1. Whether impacts related to options for future commercial development of the subject property can adequately be assessed in view of the fact that this is a non-project rezone application? Specific environmental impacts from future development of the property cannot be accurately determined due to the non-project, speculative nature of the proposed rezone. Specific project related impacts will be addressed in conjunction with a development proposal for this property.Therefore, for the present environmental evaluation of this application must assume the maximum level of development permissible in the commercial zone. One item of particular concern is that of the need for plans for drainage management system to control on-site drainage and to protect adjacent Honey Creek. 2 . Whether traffic impacts related to the rezone application have been adequately_ identified and addressed? Because of the location and the configuration of the subject property, it is anticipated that any development will have impacts which could be significant both with respect to sight distance along the Sunset Boulevard access route and with respect to site access. Prior to any site development a roadway sight distance analysis should be required. The major access on Sunset Boulevard should be required to meet minimum I.T.E. standards. Similarly, potential impacts related to the proposed emergency access route along N.E. 12th need to be presented in greater detail in the application materials. 3 . Whether impacts have been adequately evaluated with respect to displacement of potential single family developments and with respect to impacts of anticipated commercial development? The applicant has provided no information relating to the relative impacts of residential development or commercial development for the subject property. It is suggested that such information be obtained from the applicant at this time, in view of the fact that subsequent development of the Environmental Rev a Committee Dalpay Rezone May 25, 1988 Page 3 property, if it is assumed to be at a maximum level, is anticipated to have significant impacts related to site utilization and related to neighborhood development. 4 . Whether future actions on the subject property may be constrained by the Department of Natural Resources as a result of clear cutting undertaken on this property without appropriate conversion permits? Much of the subject property has been cleared without a DNR conversion permit. Under these circumstances, DNR can authorize the City to prohibit the applicant from taking any discretionary action on the property for a maximum of six years. (Citation: RCW 76. 09 . 060 At present there is no information in the application concerning penalties assessed, actions taken or authorities granted by the DNR with respect to the property. It is recommended that information relating to options for DNR/City options in this matter be obtained by the City prior to issuance of a determination for this rezone application. It is recommended that the City ensure that the applicant is enjoined from future clearing of the subject property until an approved site plan is obtained for the parcel. D. RECOMMENDATIONS: The ERC issue a Determination of Significance with respect to this application for the following reasons: 1. The proposed rezone is not congruent with the Comprehensive Plan for the City of Renton. 2. Future commercial development of the property is likely to have significant negative environmental impacts upon the local community as such development is not consistent with site characteristics and not congruent with characteristics of much of the local neighborhood. E. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS: Various City departments have reviewed and commented upon the project. These comments are as follows: Police Department: Environmental: No comments. Fire Prevention Bureau: Environmental: Minor impact. Environmental Rev. r Committee Dalpay Rezone May 25, 1988 Page 4 Design Engineering: Environmental: Access and site distance entering and existing the site are of major concern with these serious problems is the zoning requested appropriate? Is the use of Sunset Blvd N.E. as the primary access appropriate? Traffic Engineering: Environmental: Roadway sight distance impact analysis required for site access. access must meet minimum I.T.E. standards. Utility Engineering: Environmental: No comments. Parks and Recreation: Environmental: No recreation impacts at this time. Building Division: Environmental: No comments. Zoning Division: Environmental: The remaining trees on the property should not be clearcut until a development plan for the site is approved. Future development impacts of property are unknown due to speculative nature of rezone request. Must assume worse case scenario for maximum development that the B-1 zone allows. Policy Development: Environmental: Relative impacts of a commercial vs single family development on drainage particularly Honey Creek should be evaluated. Project site is being cleared without a DNR conversion permit in violation of state law. Penalties could include denial of development proposals for 6 years. Property owner should be required to mitigate damage from clear-cutting activities - exp. relative to Honey Creek. Preliminary traffic analysis estimating AOT from commercial vs single family should be done with a comparison of impacts and a capacity analysis. problems and sight distance should also be evaluated. Environmental Rev_ a Committee Dalpay Rezone May 25, 1988 Page 5 Land use impacts of commercial on single family to south are not well evaluated. Displacement land for SF homes. Part of site is classified as "environmentally sensitive" due to presence of greenbelts to W. & N. TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITT.. AGENDA May 20, 1988 Third Floor Conference Room Commencing at 10:00 a.m. TIME/KEY PARTICIPANTS NEW PROJECTS Sherwin Lisker, EconoLube & Tune, Inc. This project is submitted for environmental review as it is to be sited in the Aquifer Protection Area. The development is to be a 2800 square foot tune-up, lubricating & minor repair center on an existing vacant lot in an L-1 zone. Property located at 225 Sunset Boulevard. ECF-028-88 J. M. Dalpay, Dalpay Rezone Application for non-project action to rezone 3.02 acres of vacant property from G-1 (General Use) to B-1 (Business Use). Property located on the south side of N.E. Sunset Boulevard, west of Union Avenue. ECF 030-88; R 030-88 • Valley Medical Center, Psychiatric Wing Addition Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of a new one-story 40-bed psychiatric addition having 24,960 sq. ft and with a lower level below having a 3,000 sq. ft. mechanical/electrical room. Located at Valley Medical Center, 400 South 43rd Street. ECF-027-88; SA-027-88 City of Renton Public Works Department-I-405 Storm Drain Crossing Application to construct storm drain improvements to improve drainage capacity at the I-405 culvert near N.E. 44th Street. Property located north of I-405 at N.E. 44th Street ECF-031- 88 City of Renton, Public Works Department-South Talbot Hill Reservoir and Pipeline Improvements Application to rezone approximately two acres of property from R-1 (Residential Use) and Greenbelt to P-1 (Public Use) and to construct a reservoir and a 16 inch water pipeline. The reservoir will be located on Carr Road, east of Valley Medical Center and south of the Covenant Church Building. The watermain will be installed in Carr Road from Valley Medical Center to 103rd Place S.E. and up the reservoir access road (143rd Place S.E.) ECF 021-88; R 021-88; SA 021-88 Jeffrey Hillson-Beadex Manufacturing Application to construct a single story 8500 square foot metal warehouse to serve as an addition to an existing single story concrete building of approximately 32,000 square feet. The proposed structure will displace parking places which are to be relocated on the site. Property located at 833 Houser Way North (east of the Boeing Company and west of I-405). ECF 032-88 Accord, Inc. - Taco Time Corporate Offices Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of a corporate office building having approximately 12,029 square feet of which 92% will be office and 8% as storage. Property located south of South 2nd Street, east of Rainier Avenue South, and west of Lake Avenue South if extended, 200 Rainier Avenue South. ECF-034-88, SA-034-88 DISCUSSION ONLY Ramac, Inc. - Dan Shane Application to subdivide that portion of the Park Place Plat located at 1800 Maple Valley Highway into four (4) lots. The subject property is 6.139 acres. The present zoning is commercial (B-1) and the Comp Plan designation is also commercial. The land is vacant at this time. Proposed lots range in size from .802 acres to 2.215 acres. Property located at 1800 Maple Valley Highway (north side of the Highway and east of 1-405) ECF-029-88; SH-PL-029-88 li BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE STAFF REPORT May 20, 1988 A. BACKGROUND: APPLICANT: J. M. Dalpay PROJECT: Dalpay Rezone • ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF 030-88; R 030-88 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for non-project action to rezone 3.02 acres of vacant property from G-1 (General Use) to B-1 (Business Use) . LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: South side of N.E. Sunset Boulevard, west of Union Avenue ' 1 Y � 1 I e4 ,l 2uaer _.' .e 16 'L H,ftK NORTH > }�E 'I!!� _e .e T 1 I _ -,e; wN .�� IIIGIII AND$ • I - � .I � : •,gs� 1 '2--�_. 1i�1a+ � PAP r, '� I I 1 it ,. .,. . 1 1 I_'� ,I, I�1"1 li. ss 9L alels, ll� rz. Zt MI 7!� ST ) 1 1 Irk u E 17*ti 51 i1. ,, ,, ..:.t ei ,. e . LY -------_If�Zij1a S e 7 e,91C,1 I:eI, NF „". St I I F J W i ' R-3 a Gr' 1 36 • ' W s -; --ii } • I R sl 1 R-3 . 2NI! 4sT T R-2 • z • .o • 1 ) I RAE ‘ 2 ,n 5. NE 'j' S T' E - , S 1!.'! 1 iTII- R-3 ® • 1 1I W, i 1/ 41 STs. - - �,;�I= ; 4CiiT ;. , — 1 1 1 SI ,I)�L /,., E T 1 r .„ , 1 tP:-1-3 1160.0., ,-11I Z Itil �� �L L -, / 12 W ► �' el • •.r I e �y`-°.�.� i j + t �� a sl 11 a �Iw I ^ T / 99 // ,�,oI ,r,I,� ,.i.r .. , , O.I e Jo` N E wit, 5 0 5 ti 5 •r o // N f I I In -.-- , G 1' 1 �g� �• 5 T 4�''C•>,},./ I, m ,re 2 1 1} I' 3' , b 4 .„...,_,... L U ___. `,„ j8 ` 3 la 'C' tililt'2" II ... n H: I r�,� a s ii,. „. , • % _ ....n7 c ` / !Li }I �I uY�> to ;) le O® a��' 'I ,• /7�' a, 1r 10- 1. 1_ 3 I / ��/ 1., 4_ ,� ' L. ' II,*I r,-71 ,- i-1.'.�.1 ( .II\� '►ja 12 I)/'..w®�~ 51 -.� I� 7 l Iz( ,ILIS ICI IaI9, B. ISSUES: (LAND USE) 1. Whether the proposed rezone to commercial use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Map? The proposed rezone from residential use to commercial use is inconsistent with the Compi 'iensive Plan Map and with the Comprehensive Plan goals, both of which documents designate the property for single-family residential development. Technical Advis' r Committee Dalpay Rezone May 20, 1988 Page 2 2 . Whether the proposed rezone to commercial use and developments permitted under the commercial designation would be consistent with neighboring developments? Site topography presents a distinct physical separation between the subject property and an existing commercial area to the east. There is a lesser distinction between the subject property and residential developments to the north of the property. Property to the west of the subject property is developed, in part, with public utility lines. The subject property is most closely related (from a topographical standpoint) to the property to the south which is developed for residential uses. 3 . Whether land use impacts related to options for future commercial development of the subject property can adequately be assessed in view of the fact that this is a non-project rezone application? Land use from future development of the property cannot be determined due to the non-project, speculative nature of the proposed rezone. Therefore, an evaluation of this application must assume the maximum level of development permissible in the commercial zone. If this rezone is to be approved, it is recommended that either a contract rezone or covenants be established with required performance standards in order to address land use (and environmental) impacts from maximum potential future development. Of particular concern are issues related to design aesthetics, traffic safety, landscaping and screening. 4 . Whether traffic impacts related to the rezone application have been adequately identified and addressed? Traffic impacts are not expected to occur with respect to a non-project rezone of this property. However, it is anticipated that any development on this site has potential impacts which are significant both with respect to sight distance along the Sunset Boulevard access route and with respect to site access. Prior to any site development a roadway sight distance anaylsis should be required. The major access on Sunset Boulevard should be required to meet minimum I.T.E. standards. Potential impacts related to the proposed emergency access route along N.E. 12th need to be presented in greater detail in the application materials. • Technical Advisc • Committee Dalpay Rezone May 20, 1988 Page 3 5. Whether sufficient utility services are available to serve the subject property if the non-project rezone application is approved? A non-project rezone can be accommodated with existing utility services. It is recommended that the applicant be required to contract to participate in water system and sewer system developments at the time of rezone. It is recommended that participation in approved water and sewer plan, and fire safety plans be required at the time of development of the property. 6. Whether land use impacts have been adequately evaluated with respect to displacement of potential single family developments and with respect to impacts of anticipated commercial development? The applicant has provided no information relating to the relative impacts of residential development or commercial development for the subject property. It is suggested that such information be obtained from the applicant at this time, in view of the fact that subsequent development of the property, assumed to be at a maximum level, is anticipated to have significant impacts related to site utilization and related to neighborhood development. (ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS) 1. Whether environmental impacts related to options for future commercial development of the subject property can adequately be assessed in view of the fact that this is a non-project rezone application? Environmental impacts from future development of the property cannot be determined due to the non-project, speculative nature of the proposed rezone. Therefore, an evaluation of this application must assume the maximum level of development permissible in the commercial zone. If this rezone is to be approved, it is recommended that either a contract rezone or covenants be established with required performance standards in order to address environmental (and land use) impacts from maximum potential future development. Of particular concern are issues related to drainage management on the project site and impacts upon adjacent Honey Creek. Technical Advisc Committee Dalpay Rezone May 20, 1988 Page 4 2 . Whether future actions on the subject property may be constrained by the Department of Natural Resources as a result of clear cutting undertaken on this property without appropriate conversion permits? Much of the subject property has been cleared without a DNR conversion permit. Under these circumstances, the applicant may be prohibited from taking any discretionary action on the property for a maximum of six years. At present there is no information in the application concerning penalties assessed or actions taken by the DNR with respect to the property. It is recommended that information relating to this matter should be made available to the City prior to issuance of a determination for this rezone application. It is recommended that the City ensure that the applicant is enjoined from future clearing of the subject property until an approved site plan is obtained for the parcel. C. RECOMMENDATIONS: It is recommended that the ERC issue a Determination of Significance with respect to this application for the following reasons: 1. The proposed rezone is not congruent with the Comprehensive Plan for the City of Renton. 2 . Based upon site characteristics and characteristics of neighborhood development it is anticipated that future commercial development of the property is likely to have significant land use and environmental impacts upon the local community. D. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS: Various City departments have reviewed and commented upon the project. These comments are as follows: Police Department: Fire Prevention Bureau: Design Engineering: Detailed utility plans will be rquired at time of development. Plans to be inkon 22 x 34" original mylars. Traffic Engineering: Roadway sight distance impact analysis required for site access. Access must meet minimum ITE standards. Utility Engineering: Approved Rezone only. Parks and Recreation: • Technical Advisc • Committee Dalpay Rezone May 20, 1988 Page 5 Building Division: Zoning Division: 1. Do not recommend rezoning property to B-1 against the Comprehensive Plan (Plan designates single-family) for simply speculation unless a development plan is presented for the site. 2 . If approved, restrictive covenants should be required for site plan approval and assurance that dense screening be provided along the south property line in the form of fencing and landscaping to protect the neighboring single family dwellings. Policy Development: 1. Rezone is not consistent with Comprehensive Plan which shows the entire property as single family. Rezone is not consistent with goals of Comprehensive Plan. 2 . Topography of site physically separates property from B-1 district to east; site is physically connected to SF area to south. 3. Rezone is speculative. If approved, would recommend a contract rezone with performance standards, time limits especially relative to Honey Creek, drainage, aesthetics. 4 . Project has been cleared without a DNR conversion permit. Penalties could include denial of all discretionary actions for 6 years. a 0 CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director May 5, 1988 Roger Blaylock The Blaylock Company 10717 N.E. Fourth Street, Suite #9 Bellevue, Washington 98004 RE: Dalpay, Rezone Application, South of Sunset and west of Union Avenue, (ECF-030- 88; R-030-88) Dear Mr. Blaylock: The Building and Zoning Department has formally accepted the above referenced project. It has been routed for departmental review and is tentatively scheduled for the Technical Advisory Committee on May 25, 1988, for consideration. If you have any questions regarding the scheduling of your project, please contact our office at 235-2550. Sincerely, Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE:lb PC: J. M. Dalpay 4033 Sunset Boulevard N.E. Renton, Washington 98056 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: & *,c_f a�car\ DATE CIRCULATED: 5/2/8 COMMENTS DUE: 5/16/88 EFC -030 - 88 APPLICATION NO(S). ftezone 030-88 PROPONENT: Jim Dalpay PROJECT TITLE: Dalpay Rezone BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application to re7nne 3_f2 acres from G-1 to R-1 _ This is a non-project rezone. Property is sloped; most trees have been cut; it is vacant. Comp plan desiynatioll is for single family development. Vicinity is developed primarily with single & multi-family housing_ Some commercial deveinpment exists nn llninn Avenue, east of the site. LOCATION: South of Sunset Boulevard, West of Union SITE AREA: 3,02 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: 4/0 AK'eL retlef-i 0 " (J We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. l� Signs of Director or Authorized Representative Date Form 4 RENT.Il BUILDING & ZONING DEPA..TMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 030 - 88 APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE : R-030-88 PROPONENT : JIM DALPAY PROJECT TITLE : DALPAY REZONE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE 3. 02 ACRES FROM G-1 TO B-1 . THIS IS A NON-PROJECT REZONE. PROPERTY IS SLOPED: MOST TREES HAVE BEEN CUT; IT IS VACANT, COMP PLAN DESIGNATION IS FOR SINGLE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT. VICINITY IS DEVVELOPED PRIMARILY WITH SINGLE & MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING. SOME COMMERCIAL DEVELOP LOCATION : MENT EXISTS ON UNION AVE LOCATED SOUTH OF SUNSET BLVD. PEST OF UNION E . OF SITE. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : OENGINEERING DIVISION FITRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT OBUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT OPOLICE DEPARTMENT OPOLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1-( OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M. ON MAY 16, 1988 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : f2zdf OAPPROVED n APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED C17" G" RENTQ N tam .--�• DATE: ` i/1/4 SIGNA OF DIRECT OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 cry 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET �'�PE,�, ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: \ice. _ ifLq � • 5/2/88 COMMENTS DUE: 5/16�::• Y- DATE CIRCULATED. 41 t7 x "� ctj2 96$ !) EFC -030 - 88 APPLICATION NO(S). Rezone 030-88 O%Afti DRA PROPONENT: Jim Dalpay Y' PROJECT TITLE: Dalpay Rezone BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application to rezone 3_(17 acres from G-1 to R-1 _ This is a non-project rezone. Property is sloped; most trees have been cut; it is vacant. Comp plan d h single & multi-family hnusiig_ Some c.mmerrial mievelnpment exists nn Union Avenue, east of the site. LOCATION: South of Sunset Boulevard, West of Union SITE AREA: 3.02 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air • 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals • 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: , FDA IGG 0 We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. ,/ • / S gnature o�fDirectorbor Authorized Representative Date Form 4 RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 4 0). ycFRF DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEbI�� S / °" 4o, 1 / 8$ ECF - 030 - 88 0 kb ON-.47 APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE : R-Q30-88 o�A PROPONENT : JIM DAT,PAY PROJECT TITLE : DALPAY REZONE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE 3. 02 ACRES FROM G-1 TO B-1 . THIS IS A NON-PROJECT REZONE. PROPERTY IS SLOPED: MOST TREES HAVE BEEN CUT; IT IS VACANT. COMP PLAN DESIGNATION IS FOR SINGLE FAMILY .DEVELOPMENT. VICINITY IS DEVVELOPED PRIMARILY WITH SINGLE & MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING. SOME COMMERCIAL DEVELOP LOCATION : MENT EXISTS ON UNION AVE LOCATED SOUTH OF SUNSET BLVD. WEST OF UNION E . OF SITE . TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : ENGINEERING DIVISION OTRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : OUTILITIES ENG , DIVISION ( FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU ( PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OOTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M. ON MAY 16, 1988 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : p011ee I ( APPROVED OAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED DATE : SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 • 1— cry 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET Oft, O 471 . F/42b4. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: )01k(. e-f vu- + 46 'l6' 5/2/88 COMMENTS DUE: 5 1 9 q DATE CIRCULATED: , 3 — 88 CITY OF A(TMENT EFC 0 0 APPLICATION NO(S). ftezone 030-88 JJ0 MAY 2 194 PROPONENT: Jim Galpay I� E e f6it PROJECT TITLE: Dalpay Rezone l� BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application to rezone 3_(12 acres from G-1 to R-1 _ This is a non-project rezone. Property is sloped; most trees have been cut; it is vacant. Comp plan designation is for single family development. Vicinity is developed primarily with single & multi-family housing_ Some commercial development exists nn Union Avenue, pact of the site. LOCATION: South of Sunset Boulevard, West of Union SITE AREA: 3.02 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air ` / 3) Water >c 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 7L 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: 1� 1�.�c�, C crf sF cc Ckc.w.�esjo.,-x� e� .�..c�c — u-c.o C�•C..rc, s4zc,. }R.s,...4.,1,tc44. -+ c,Gc�.J� o 44,Za 4) - ,-,� Aor �--.-� e_ S F 4..L. -go&L �..,..�. .. ►•, a ✓f'✓��',�.,pp - eve'6.62' c ..10.E-14 .e ette•421,...4.L SitstaiS ga-4LaiA1. Pa-4—E. SF�•� , -t t , ort,t,.✓� Itt (-a). ' N . We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Form 4 • RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTICntNT C>r` Z* DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEVI��� ,i`��� 4;7;67 10.04, ECF - 030 - 88 '4 APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE : R-030-88 04`4, PROPONENT : JIM DALPAY PROJECT TITLE : DALPAY REZONE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE 3. 02 ACRES FROM G-1 TO B-1 . THIS IS A NON-PROJECT REZONE. PROPERTY IS SLOPED: MOST TREES HAVE BEEN CUT; IT IS VACANT. COMP PLAN DESIGNATION IS FOR SINGLE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT. VICINITY IS DEVVELOPED PRIMARILY WITH SINGLE & MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING. SOME COMMERCIAL DEVELOP LOCATION : MENT EXISTS ON UNION AVE LOCATED SOUTH OF SUNSET BLVD_ WEST OF UNION E. OF SITE . TO: n PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : OENGINEERING DIVISION F-1 TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : OUTILITIES ENG . DIVISION n FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU OPARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT ELPOLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M. ON MAY 16, 1988 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : ?c(Kl�. Q_1cpMQvtfi n APPROVED O APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED .a/AAA_ .1.7 , Crr+4.p. et/4,,.• D • z) 1 -° 1 - - Pam! 44,. .° a-' 3) thic,„.v.a o►. DATE: s- /4 . ?� SIGNATURE O DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 O 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET Goo' ��9�Q. 1°F . **(-, REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Ev\q�ne -lU ZC p .oei 0 DATE CIRCULATED: 5/2/8e COMMENTS DUE: 5/16/88 ENO °70 �IN EFC -030 - 88 ���,C P6 APPLICATION NO(S). fZezone 030-88 p PROPONENT: Jim Calpay 0.4 A PROJECT TITLE: Dalpay Rezone BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application to re7nne 3.02 acres from G-1 to R-1 _ This is a non-project rezone. Property is sloped; most trees have been cut; it is vacant. Comp plan deslyndLion Is for single fdmlly development. Vicinity is developed primdrily with single & multi-family hnusing_ Some commercial development exists nn union Avenue, east of the site. LOCATION: South of Sunset Boulevard, West of Union SITE AREA: 3.02 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water '.,/- 4) Plants -.---- 5) Animals 1_/ 6) Energy and Natural Resources u' 7) Environmental Health ,,--` 8) Land and Shoreline Use l."`' 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics `` 11) Light and Glare x- 12) Recreation `'" 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation `' -- 15) Public Services 16) Utilities '.,/ COMMENTS: ,-' ,-.. , c , , ..ram 1 .� -._ C A_e. './ ( e /� ,4' ` ' ..°4'= -)--:'.s+ =L,1 -' t ( a We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature Director o Aut orized Representative Date Form 4 RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPAR 1MENT 4siS car VIE1 \F DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION RE � 4,, tic`- Oefoleib ff, ECF 030 88 chele4 APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE : R-030-88 QUA PROPONENT : JIM DALPAY PROJECT TITLE : DALPAY REZONE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE 3 . 02 ACRES FROM G-1 TO B-1 . THIS IS A NON-PROJECT REZONE. PROPERTY IS SLOPED : MOST TREES HAVE BEEN CUT; IT IS VACANT. COMP PLAN DESIGNATION IS FOR SINGLE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT. VICINITY IS DEVVELOPED PRIMARILY WITH SINGLE & MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING. SOME COMMERCIAL DEVELOP LOCATION : MENT EXISTS ON UNION AVE LOCATED SOUTH OF SUNSET BLVD. WEST OF UNION E . OF SITE . TO : n PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : ELFIGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU OPARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT OPOLICE DEPARTMENT OPOLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT n OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M. ON MAY 16, 1988 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : " n APPROVED n APPROVED WITH CO1 DITIONS EINOT APPROVED de' DATE : SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 • IS Cs REVIEW SHEET 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST � 4%Oko„F REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Tra <. G( ��4). /�"bti DATE CIRCULATED: 5/2/88 COMMENTS DUE: 5/16/88 "�'i U9 EFC -030 - 88 +' ,9g8 O APPLICATION NO(S). Rezone 030-88 tiC OF PROPONENT: Jim Calpay '�j. PROJECT TITLE: Dalpay Rezone BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application to rezone 3_f2 acres from G-1 to R-1 This is a non-project rezone. Property is sloped; most trees have been cut; it is vacant. Comp plan designdilon Is for single family development. Vicinity. is developed primarily with single & multi-family housing_ Some commercial development exists nn union Avenue, east of the site. LOCATION: South of Sunset Boulevard, West of Union SITE AREA: 3.02 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants v 5) Animals !/ 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics G-- 11) Light and Glare t.---- 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: t _ k kk,, ::4 �"` 4. a. TE sfa,) s /JIFF I We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. `— // 7 a Signature of Director or Authori d Representative Date Form 4 • ' RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPAR 1MENT 00 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW S441,,, ECF 030 88 ti,e. c9c9 APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE : R-030-88 cep, PROPONENT : JIM DALPAY PROJECT TITLE : DALPAY REZONE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE 3. 02 ACRES FROM G-1 TO B-1 . THIS IS A NON-PROJECT REZONE. PROPERTY IS SLOPED: MOST TREES HAVE BEEN CUT; IT IS VACANT: COMP PLAN DESIGNATION IS FOR SINGLE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT. VICINITY IS DEVVELOPED PRIMARILY WITH SINGLE & MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING. SOME COMMERCIAL DEVELOP LOCATION : MENT EXISTS ON UNION AVE LOCATED SOUTH OF SUNSET BLVD. WEST OF UNION E . OF SITE . TO : 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : OENGINEERING DIVISION NTRAFFIC ENG, DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : OUTILITIES ENG . DIVISION n FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU El PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT Ei BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT n POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT n OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M. ON MAY 16, 1988 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Taf ri APPROVED El APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS Ld<JOT APPROVED 4-- 1-1 q, " e ace` DATE : .,4,y•>/ J" SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTH ZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 1 : 441444' 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET 44. . lif440 N./p REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: �I-1-a lt-h�S ANQ ` 79 s / 0��N 88 DATE CIRCULATED: 5/2/88 COMMENTS DUE: 5/16/88 EFC - 030 - 88 Q APPLICATION NO(S). Rezone 030-88 PROPONENT: Jim Dalpay PROJECT TITLE: Dalpay Rezone BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application to rezone 3 Jl2 acres from G-1 to R-1 This is a non-project rezone. Property is sloped; most trees have been cut; it is vacant. Comp plan d h single & multi-family housing_ Some rnnmerr'ial develnpment exists nn Union Avenue, east of the site. LOCATION: South of Sunset Boulevard, West of Union SITE AREA: 3.02 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities r/' COMMENTS: We have re -wed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expet • in ;n• have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additiona 'or : 1 is needed to properly assess this proposal. I , J 517 88 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Form 4 • RENTaiv BUILDING & ZONING DEPAh IMENT 0DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW,,,SHVfCfPk4t4;14/Pb / Njo�NQ ` �9NtO ECF - 030 - 88 44.tooA APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE : R-030-88 PROPONENT : JIM DALPAY PROJECT TITLE : DALPAY REZONE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE 3. 02 ACRES FROM G-1 TO B-1 . THIS IS A NON-PROJECT REZONE. PROPERTY IS SLOPED: MOST TREES HAVE BEEN CUT; IT IS VACANT. COMP PLAN DESIGNATION IS FOR SINGLE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT. VICINITY IS DEVVELOPED PRIMARILY WITH SINGLE & MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING. SOME COMMERCIAL DEVELOP LOCATION : MENT EXISTS ON UNION AVE LOCATED SOUTH OF SUNSET BLVD. REST OF UNION E . OF SITE . TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : ENGINEERING DIVISION ri TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 15411TILITIES ENG . DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU El PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT El BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT n POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT n OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P .M. ON MAY 16, 1988 PARTMENT/DIVISION : OT/,L/T%ES E✓ APPROVED n APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS q ' NOT APPROVED [UTILITY APPROVAL SUBJECT TCL G/Ty LATE COMERS AGREEMENT-t.s-_..,i vim• W- 3/_S /O. 7Iq/ ". . AI. ,���c.vst-ZZ IXs�sc. LATE CMS AGREEMENT-Sr,. I o p SYSTEM IIVELIPMENT CHAR _b:: S. •D s'4�FI. x/3/ .cs'Zo 11 (3•ozic,).SS'200 = .4S SYS IEVELOPIENT CNARCE-.� ' � r. 4¢/., �i •� _ 4.Z oS' SPECIAL ANT AREA CI:""-- Al'"' -t " _ � �S2� !G : . SPECIAL AUNT AREA CNtiC,m 061 5'77 S/o APPROVED WATER PLAN �"- APPROVED SEWER PLAN YES APPROVED FIRE HYDRANT LOCATIO S O BY FIRE DEPT. yJ, Q FIRE FLC?ANALYSIS �/ S aok.,,Q. ©p441., Q .1 . ! DATE: SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR 0 AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 rycF • evi 9? Ket, • 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET at/p DEPARTMENT: ire a,�, 4 ice, N�j2'n�' 988 5/2/88 COMMENTS DUE: 5/16/88 DATE CIRCULATED: QF.p EFC - 030 - 88 Mk ZJ I� 7; APPLICATION NO(S). f2ezone 030-88 "gyp PROPONENT: Jim Dalpay PROJECT TITLE: Dalpay Rezone BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application to re7nnP 3_02 acres from G-1 to R-1 _ This is a non-project rezone. Property is sloped; most trees have been cut; it is vacant. Comp plan desiyndtlun Is fur single fdmlly development. Vicinity Is developed primarily with single & multi-family housing_ Snme cnmmerr:ial (1PvPlnpment exists nn Union AvPnuP, Past of the site. LOCATION: South of Sunset Boulevard. West of Union SITE AREA: 3.02 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) 'Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: 2iWo a ?Ar24c e. We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal..11 6 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Form 4 RENTOi4 BUILDING & ZONING DEPAI. :'MENT CO/1,/bC)A/ cF �Q DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIE j E 1988 �IoN�NO D ECF - 030 - 88 Fes'' APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE : R-03D-88 PROPONENT : JIM DALPAY PROJECT TITLE : DALPAY REZONE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE 3. 02 ACRES FROM G-1 TO B-1 . THIS IS A NON-PROJECT REZONE. PROPERTY IS SLOPED: MOST TREES HAVE BEEN CUT; IT IS VACANT, COMP PLAN DESIGNATION IS FOR SINGLE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT. VICINITY IS DEVVELOPED PRIMARILY WITH SINGLE & MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING. SOME COMMERCIAL DEVELOP LOCATION : MENT EXISTS ON UNION AVE LOCATED SOUTH OF SUNSET BLVD. WEST OF UNION E . OF SITE . TO: ] PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : OENGINEERING DIVISION OTRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : OUTILITIES ENG . DIVISION ELFIRE PREVENTION BUREAU OPARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT OBUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT OPOLICE DEPARTMENT OPOLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OOTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON MAY 16, 1988 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : fWe_ i)reNICY141all [EIROVED n APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED . 1/. 6754 .C%�,4ar.1 DATE: ,1 177. /98Q SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE CJ REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 . . ., 4e17' CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET O,� 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL H Cp;;;Pok REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: - ,„\ct„vi tt, }'o # DATE CIRCULATED: 5/2/8E COMMENTS DUE: 5/16/88 �N _ �j 4) EFC - 030 - 88 G/ ONE 94 N APPLICATION NO(S). Bezone 030-88 w bo PROPONENT: Jim Dalpay l' PROJECT TITLE: Dalpay Rezone BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application to re7nne 3.02 acres from G-1 to R-1 _ This is a non-project rezone. Property is sloped; most trees have been cut; it is vacant. Comp plan desiyndtion Is fur single family development.. Vicinity, Is developed primdrily with single & multi-family housing_ Some commercial development exists nn llninn Avenue, east of the site. LOCATION: South of Sunset Boulevard, West of Union SITE AREA: 3.02 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 7 .---- 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional informatn is needed to properly assess this proposal. , ';- e.-4.- c..1 i-61.04 . Signature irector or Authorized Representative Date F 4 RENTO.a BUILDING & ZONING DEPAt. . MENT Lairy tiro DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW4 H /1j" 4/c3 1'49 44-44!) ee ECF - 030 - 88 44s APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE : R-030-88 4�pr PROPONENT : JIM DALPAY PROJECT TITLE : DALPAY REZONE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE 3. 02 ACRES FROM G-1 TO B-1 . THIS IS A NON-PROJECT REZONE. PROPERTY IS SLOPED: MOST TREES HAVE BEEN CUT; IT IS VACANT, COMP PLAN DESIGNATION IS FOR SINGLE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT. VICINITY IS DEVVELOPED PRIMARILY WITH SINGLE & MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING. SOME COMMERCIAL DEVELOP LOCATION : MENT EXISTS ON UNION AVE LOCATED SOUTH OF SUNSET BLVD. WEST OF UNION E. OF SITE . TO: 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : OENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : DUTILITIES ENG , DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU F-1 PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT MBUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT n POLICE DEPARTMENT OPOLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT n OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING, PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M. ON MAY 16, 1988 , REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : CO 6 n APPROVED n APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ' NOT APPROVED .'c 0> P4 /ate nay,-ram. (-- /-74 DATE: c_��V i1 SIGNATURE OF DI OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 • f •. v e. 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET *4 0 ''�REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 2�„ �, DATE CIRCULATED: 5/2/88 COMMENTS DUE: 5/16/88 III, Al, tIS EFC - 030 - 88 i 9 vir APPLICATION NO(S). Bezone 030-88 e1 PROPONENT: Jim Dalpay PROJECT TITLE: Dalpay Rezone BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application to re7nne 3.112 acres from G-1 to R-1 _ This is a non-project rezone. Property is sloped; most trees have been cut; it is vacant. Comp plan deslyndtiorl is fur single family development. Vicinity, is developed primarily with single & Jnulti-family housing_ Some commercial development exists nn union Avenue, east of the site. LOCATION: South of Sunset Boulevard,^West of Union.Awe, ()E. ki•E . 275 ti41 SITE AREA: 3.02 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): N)) - IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: O HE KEVYC)I0Ie0G TKM. ON -NE P opEa'( spoLA00 ruol ZR, CA.ENI- Car VN'1ll.. N t eire.L IMEJt1 pus foK sae is. 140PRCNFA d FL&-r c 0P0)00-1 WAP oc ?RoPiert Pat u1,t..1Kti:(40N 'putt. it) specuiLik-rlkk. to-NriAkk. ar Recove Res+u s1 1ti►+�� ,emsu t WO\ 3t CAS. Scabto RXL As I m t4Y✓L LoprnerOf tow it M..LO US, We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. • 'f: 1.N.,0t Cp 1 1 a 8% Signature of D ctor or Authorized Representative Datel Form 4 RENT4.4 BUILDING & ZONING DEPAh. fMENT OC>1)- „ DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEWsi,l- 'E ,, ECF - 030 - 88 4 40A% APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE : R-030-88 V►, PROPONENT : JIM DALPAY PROJECT TITLE : DALPAY REZONE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE 3 . 02 ACRES FROM G-1 TO B-1 . THIS IS A NON-PROJECT REZONE. PROPERTY IS SLOPED: MOST TREES HAVE BEEN CUT; IT IS VACANT. COMP PLAN DESIGNATION IS FOR SINGLE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT. VICINITY IS DEVVELOPED PRIMARILY WITH SINGLE & MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING. SOME COMMERCIAL DEVELOP LOCATION : MENT EXISTS ON UNION AVE LOCATED SOUTH OF SUNSET BLVD. MST OF UNION E . OF SITE . TO: 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : ENGINEERING DIVISION F-1 TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 17jUTILITIES ENG . DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU El] PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT OBUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT OPOLICE DEPARTMENT OPOLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1-( OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P .M. ON MAY 16, 1988 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : WN) LJIO1 010 n APPROVED n APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED CD Do t CoMMEIVO IZ -CCIV►Ngo 441 Mapeemy To a-1 1(oP )51 TI+ COrIpi z I S1Vr, Pk-fo Zre5i6A005 SIN/AA FINitntLd1) fo Sir WL1 c u L cflQu Lt to L 5 bt✓vacervivo 1 pl,An) 1 s Pv serif ¶oft - - & d IF 1�IPP IZi.19D, l'`es'Tn.ICflc coveJJAAY1. Cabu un (bE R3zetthigsto Fog- 5flE PsPPRAVAL.-- 14100 PW R MX . ftThT' Dtusc 4bampirvb P?Zoo p nk T►+- scourt4 PI/optitTy L I , 1 N) TNT C)F xI1\1C6 A00 l> 3CNPR% `TC) PR:c cr TIC NM6 N I J(o `3I N(o C.1E TAW►1 Lam( Ottl.l.l M,S J N;101. _,__ DATE : m (D ' 1g88 SIGNATURE I.RECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE 1 REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 41Zs IY I 've looked at this application -- it appears complete and accurate. On that basis, it's ready for circulation. However, I am not convinced that: a) this property is any better suited for commercial development than for residential development; b) that a non-project rezone (even with the applicant's promise to submit a site plan) is a good idea. L.B. .0 DALPAY PLAZA REZONE ._ 71 //7 N. :?HASE sr Vo •' 1�\ 4TF c,� l , R SoN ' O/� o9e ` - � 90 _' 74.6z bit,1 Jc nson 0s0tiC.......,o = a +�7/� ; t /a4 c ..41 rrsFT R`R F Becf , r.�.�23 O /�� YF i4 t i 3 A9 Ac a NNI i L,2Z3 ', 1•L%. I. c �.' • T.z.99 ••. C. •Tl.bl •Tl./UC Johnson W 1 Et ?ps :,t r� t' N Ns I. 60 W \1 i/ �;I .,, T �Z v`o�� 1 h r s� W _s_v .J: `-! 8 1P q > 1 I T L.73.3. \ s. � Z r illoa0i i 7.c .4 I W I > 0 1I b I V:2 ' ,,,.3o/ . 71 FO .rar . .1/:. 11 _ 97 8S r :.84, 1—_ 90 / /SO I Z M __ 0 `•- �• :::�'i NE 12th ST „ • . ' RENTON, W ASH INGTON do APR IL, 1 988limir INDEX Justification 1 Application 5 Environmental Checklist 7 Site Plan and Vicinity Map 20 CITY OF RENTON RECEIVED APR 191988 BUILDING/ZONING DEP_TT 1 THE BLAYLOCK COMPANY specialists in land-use procedures April 19, 1988 Mr. Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator City of Renton Building and Zoning Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 RE: REZONE OF DALPAY PROPERTY LOCATED ON SUNSET BOULEVARD N.E. Dear Mr. Erickson: The Blaylock Company has been retained by Mr. Jim Dalpay to assist in the rezoning of 3.02 acres from G-1, General Use to B-1, Business Use. The following unique features of the subject site's location and topography suggest that rezoning the property to a Commercial use is appropriate: 1. The only access to the property is from Sunset Blvd N.E. 2. The 3.02 acres is actually wedged in between an established commercial area to the east, major public power lines to the west, and large lot residential to the south. 3. The topography of the site not only focuses the property to Sunset Boulevard N.S. , but creates an identity separate from the large lot single family residential area south of the site. 4. The intrusion of traffic noises from Sunset Blvd N.E. on to the subject site is a significant adverse impact that limits the ultimate land use. Since the Comprehensive Plan does not specifically consider the subject site's unique features, emphasis should be placed on the Goals and Policies of the Comprehensive Plan. At the same time the site's unique features suggest very careful development review of any proposed development. The applicant will include in the rezone application the voluntary condition of site plan approval for any future development on the site. 10717 NE Fourth Street,Suite 9 • Bellevue,Washington 98004 • (206)455-1550 } Dalpay Rezone April 19, 1988 page 2 REZONING JUSTIFICATION This requested change in the zone classification complies with all three zoning criteria established under Section 4-3014: (1) the current zoning preceded the last Comprehensive Plan land use analysis, (2) there have been significant and material changes in the area, and (3) in conformance with the policies set forth in the Comprehensive Plan, the reclassification to B-1 is appropriate. (1) The current zoning preceded the last Comprehensive Plan land use analysis. In 1981, the Planning Commission reviewed the Comprehensive Plan for the Northeast Quadrant. The property was annexed to the city by ordinance 3879 adopted January 14, 1985. At the time of annexation, it was zoned G-1, General, a holding zone. A final determination as to the ultimate zoning was not reached at that time in 1985. (2) There have been significant and material changes in the area. A neighborhood commercial area that has developed surrounding the intersection of the two arterials, Union and Sunset, has undergone dramatic changes since 1980. Over 90 per cent of the commercial space has been constructed in this period of time. All of the spaces are occupied. In fact a specialized automotive center was developed east of the intersection. Residential condominiums have been constructed north east of the intersection, across the highway and a greenbelt from the property. However, the most significant change in the area resulted from the removal of the sewer moratorium in the area. The completion of the Honey Creek sanitary sewer line in 1984 allowed both residential and commercial activity to increase to meet the needs of the growing community. In fact, sewer availability has allowed the annexation of six major parcels within 1 mile of the subject site during the last 2 years. (3) The reclassification to B-1 is in conformance with the policies set forth in the Comprehensive Plan, and the rezone is appropriate. Dalpay Rezone April 19, 1988 page 3 During the last review of the Comprehensive Plan for the Northeast Quadrant the Planning Commission recognized that special commercial areas should be developed to serve the residential neighborhoods. Some of the implementing policies stated in the Northeast Plan urge the rezone: III.B. (1) Land use decisions within the Northeast Quadrant should be consistent with available transportation, community facilities, and utilities. The site is located on Sunset Boulevard N. E. , the principal arterial between Renton and Issaquah. The arterial has sufficient capacity to allow development of the site into commercial activities. Union Avenue provides access from the county area between Renton and Bellevue. Metro bus line 114 brings passengers from this area which is rapidly developing to urban densities. Other Metro lines travel along Union and 12th from northeast Renton, downtown Renton and areas on the plateau east of Renton. Renton utilities and facilities are available. Both sanitary sewer and domestic water is available to the subject site. III.B. (3) Land development should progress logically from west to east on the East Renton Plateau. . . V. A. 4. Commercial areas should be located and designed to minimize travel and congestion and to promote safety. The residential areas west of Union are mostly filled in and several multi-family developments, as well as single family, have been built to the east of the site along the Sunset corridor and on Union. New development has also been occurring in the commercial area between Union and Duvall. If the site were developed as a single family residential area, the 12 to 14 homes would have to create their own identity and neighborhood and would not be an extension of any existing single family residential area. The addition of several driveways onto Sunset would be impractical and might prove to be dangerous. I Dalpay Rezone April 19, 1988 Page 4 The subject site is tied more closely to the commercial activities along Sunset Boulevard N.E. than the residential activities on the plateau to the south. Both the accessibility and the north-facing slope direct the focus of the property to the established neighborhood commercial center developed at the intersection of Sunset and Union. The topography of the area lends itself to creating a land use separation at the ridge line, which is located along the southern property line of the subject site. This would strengthen the borders of the commercial node. The proposed rezone is both appropriate and timely. The rezone would extend the commercial node into an area which was not in the city at the time of the last Comprehensive Plan consideration for the Northeast Quadrant. There have been significant changes in the area. The reclassification to B-1 is in conformance with the commercial uses in this development around the intersection of the two arterials--N. E. Sunset Boulevard and Union Avenue N. E. S' cerely, Ro er� 11J. Bla ock THE BLAYLOCK COMPANY AP-JUST.DOC I of Y" o CiTY OF RENT0iii FILE NO(S): R_ 02)o -88 C� p BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT ET-o30 -Pf , MASTER APPU CATION NOTE TO APPLICANT: Since this is a comprehensive application form, only those items related to your specific type of application(s) are to be completed. (Please print or type. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) APPLICANT I I TYPE OF APPLICATION NAME FEES J. M. Dalpay 1.,x.J1 REZONE*(FROM (-1 TO R-1 ) ADtF S3 Sunset Boulevard N. E. ❑ SPECIAL PERMIT* CITY ZIP TEMPORARY PERMIT* Renton, WA 98056 ❑ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT* TEL PHONE ❑ SITE PLAN APPROVAL �2 0 6) 2 2 6-6 3 6 3 [D SPECIAL PERMIT FOR GRADE AND FILL No. of Cubic Yards: 1:::] VARIANCE* CONTACT PERSON From Section: * Justification Required NAME Roger Blaylock ADDRESS The Blaylock C o. SUBDIVISIONS: 10717 NE Fourth St. , Suite 9 ❑ SHORT PLAT CITY Bellevue, W A 98004 , ZIP ❑ TENTATIVE PLAT ❑ PRELIMINARY PLAT TELEPHONE 2 0 6 ) 4 5 5-1 5 5 0 ❑ FINAL PLAT ❑ WAIVER (Justification Required) OWNER NO. OF LOTS: NAME PLAT NAME: J. M. Dalpay 1 ADDRESS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: 4 3-3—rsrr"RSr t A n i 1 -„ J N.E. ❑ PRELIMINARY CITY ZIP ❑ FINAL Renton , WA 98056 P.U.D. NAME: TELEPHONE ❑ Residential 0 Industrial ❑ Commercial ❑ Mixed LOCATION ��RRO0PpRR�� S MOBILE HOME PARKS: JouEEthY PDRES Sunset Boulevard, ❑ TENTATIVE west of I l n i n n ❑ PRELIMINARY EXISTING USE PRESENT ZONING vacant G-1 FINAL PROPOSED USE PARK NAME: commercial /office NUMBER OF SPACES: v 0 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE SQ. FT. J ACRES AREA: 3. 02 TOTAL FEES STAFF USE ONLY -- ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING DATE f APPLICATION RECEIVED BY: 11:8f.4,-,,ivo- vil APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: APR 1 il 19113 ❑ Accepted ❑ Incomplete Notification Sent nn By: $UILVING/T®NING DVPT. (InitiAs) DATE ROUTED ADDITIONAL MATERIAL RECEIVED BY: Lip 7- It-b APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: JAccepted ❑ Incomplete Notification Sent On By: (Initials) ROUTED TO: ❑ Building ❑ Design Eng. ❑ Fire ❑ Parks ❑ Police 0 Policy Dev. ❑ Traffic Eng. ❑ Utilities 5 REVISED 1-31-84 City of Renton ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Dalpay Plaza 2. Name of applicant: J. M. Dalpay 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Applicant: J. M. Dalpay 4033 Sunset Blvd N.E. Renton, WA 98055 (206) 226-6363 Contact: Roger J. Blaylock The Blaylock Co. 10717 NE Fourth St, Suite 9 Bellevue, WA 98004 (206) 455-1550 4. Date checklist prepared: April 19, 1988 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton, Washington 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable) : N/A 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansions, or further activity relative to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. Plans for specific projects will be subject to review. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. None 7 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Applications will be made for specific projects. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Rezone + 3.02 acres from G-1 to B-1. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site (s) . Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topography map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. GENERAL DESCRIPTION South of Sunset Boulevard N.E. , approximately 250' west of Union Avenue N.S. , east of the power line right-of- way, and approximately 355' north of N.E. 12th Street. LEGAL DESCRIPTION That portion of the S.E. 1/4 of the S.E. 1/4 of Section 4 Township 23 N. Range 5 E. W.M. lying south of the Renton-Issaquah road or Sunset Highway; except the east 280' thereof; and except the west 470' thereof; and except the south 385' thereof; and except that portion deeded to State of Washington for road by deed recorded under Ring County Recorder No. 7104080105 situate in the County of King, State of Washington. Tax lot 042305-9063 (3.02 Acres) 8 B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one) ; flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other slope The subject site slopes from south to north to the highway right-of-way which drops sharply to Sunset Boulevard N.S. The southern portion of the site is the northern extremity of the plateau on which single family residential development to the south is built. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope) ? The steepest slope is the 5% of the site on the east end where the slope is approximately 35%. The rest of the lot slopes at about 15% from the plateau on the south to the highway right-of way on the north. Slopes along the right-of way slope at 35-40% down to Sunset Boulevard. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck) ? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. The soils are a mixture of sands, gravels and cobbles. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No e. Describe the purpose, type and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. None. This question would be addressed at the time of a proposal for specific development. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction or use? If so, generally describe. Erosion could occur as a result of the ultimate development activity. The topography of the site will be carefully considered as an integral component of the final development. 9 g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings) ? Unknown. This question will be addressed by the application for a specific proposal. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: These measures will be proposed in connection with the site plan for a specific development. 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e. , dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. None. This question would be addressed at the time of a proposal for specific development. b. Are there any offsite sources of emission? Traffic on Sunset Boulevard N. E. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Landscaping done in connection with a specific development would reduce impacts. 3. WATER a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands) ? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200' ) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. N/A 10 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. N/A 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example) : Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals. . . ; agricultural; etc. ) . Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable) , or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. City sewers are available to the site. c. Water Runoff (including storm water) : 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known) . Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Storm water would continue the present pattern of flowing to the north under Sunset Boulevard to Honey Creek. 11 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: None planned at this time. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: o deciduous tree: alder, aspen, elm, walnut, pear, apple o evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other yew o shrubs: blackberries, holly o grass o crop or grain o wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other o water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? The ultimate amount of vegetation to be removed will depend upon the development. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Landscaping will be planned in connection with specific development plans for the site. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, finches, blue jays, other blackbirds, sparrows Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other_ 12 b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain No d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Unknown. This question would be addressed at the time of a proposal for specific development. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of the proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: None at this time since a specific project proposal is not presented. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. None 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Unknown 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None 13 b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other) ? Traffic noise from Sunset Boulevard N.E. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long -term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other) ? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Unknown. This question would be addressed at the time of a proposal for specific development. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None at this time. 8 . Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The subject site is vacant. To the east is partially developed B-1, Business Use, zoning on the southwest corner of the intersection of Union Avenue South and Sunset Boulevard N.E. This is a part of the expanding commercial node around this important intersection. To the north across Sunset Boulevard N. E. and May Creek Valley, is a large condominium complex. Approximately 150' to the west is a major north-south power transmission line that is classified as Greenbelt in the Comprehensive Plan. Adjacent, to the south, are five large lots, each approximately one acre in size. On N.E. 12th Street are a series of 6 single family residences. These are located on lots that are generally twice as large as the residential lots located south of N.E. 12th Street. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No 14 c. Describe any structures on the site. There are no structures on the site. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? G-1, General Single Family f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Single Family g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not applicable. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? This would depend upon the ultimate development. j . Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: N/A 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: A rezone to B-1 would continue the commercial zoning around the intersection of the two arterials, Sunset and Union. The power line greenbelt would provide a buffer to the west. 15 c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Some light from traffic and from the street standards along Sunset Boulevard N.B. might intrude into the site. But, since the site is higher than the street, this should not present a problem. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Kiwanis Park is located approximately 3/4 mile south of the subject site. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreational opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Unknown. This question would be addressed at the time of a proposal for specific development. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None are known. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: N/A 17 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Direct access is provided from Sunset Boulevard N.S. Secondary emergency access could be provided from N.B. 12th Street. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Metro Transit Routes are provided approximately 500' to 700' away on Union Avenue N.S. and N.S. 12th Street. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Unknown at this time. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private) . No e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Unknown. This question would be addressed at the time of a proposal for specific development. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: Specific measures would have to be identified at the time of building construction. 18 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other) ? No. This question would be addressed at the time of a proposal for specific development. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None at this time. 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. None at this time. C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. n_ Proponent: ` Name Printed: g?,d G 19 : /\ LEGEND { 2E • '1^- Q .J S C A L E:1'.20' \7Y.Y ':,_1 C u —e sEEEET I.MOT AtiK 2 1 4. 1:S k. L" —save.Elve -- - \ � � Mst■LIMA '• / Z COON TM[[ ''+ ...... •-.:••. ••••"1 I ifr 1 N : . 0 1 „, _ ,. 7,1,.: .....::.::::...., 4! , p Y • Ma lau ST 1 �lit ,...40., Two !. at ../ -:..'::.....:,,,N, 1=1Pi ri k::"..A iV, Si `' ,� f -tit clef,. dl�, ',i�idl a o �i �, � �� '�''Ot a r, N 0 1•- h f, cc !� s.M' Q Q 6 VICINITY M A Pa_ J=///) f,:\ SSCsa l i .•.ass• o�' 8 : 8s >- 03 Qm - •-.,....... ."...' ..::......:T.... ... '''.......:.".-:. . ... : I-- JCOo Qzz , * * y• . ,,,.._,,,, I 'Ill\...,,,,.,,:i...... - ••••::-..::::.: : 40 * , ' ��tr- >:: ;i -.. , ----------lict____40411 - -,:- , , :\ M 4 fi ojit _. _ i 411111011018.11111111111=111111M. 4 ... , _. .... ,......._ ...._ .. _ . . . _ 196S REAL '' 'i A f'sr..., A X STA' t:ritiltAN! i ... ... ..., .,1..i1-1 ,..'f. ‘4,.1.., .1.,,:‘ ICE:MP.':i • ''' '''''' ',"' ' ,::::;,,,,Y',(0.).. --.4k133:.rivr-,r,1110'.7::..iiiriA17.0%&Alficit71.7.17113717,TEc:i:=7: 314.7 :)<-_,15:-9r„,., 73--H -•-,-• ,•,,, • . , 9, :_ . ,:. , ,: ,)1 •. . ' 4 '. • .,s l',... ''•^;(• 1• :, ) -) , t7( .?i ,:. ,'''-,' '''' 't ,;''•irt. e3/47; '-j ' '''' ' ' (94i . , . _ . ...:. 'W.-,-V?:'',•''''i.'?"::!,,,11!•)''''',,, ''•,),,''''))k'*4')'404)4(), A. ` ' ', r 4 i•-?3 ,'.. -, ;) l';'7 ,.,/ t4 t.Y c.; Cr- '': " ,..- r t T ir OF 4460.0LIIIVZSilititirr - - . - —— -- - -- - - _ 1988 REAL ESTATE TAX AND SURFACE ANA1 EH MA.NA.(74.-.ME, z'ROPERTY TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER Lr-c-firttgit KING COUNT')', STP,TE L.-;1: vvI.:-.; '''.• : ' :',, , _ -----\ 500 FOURTH AVENUE. SEA 1 Ti.ti: '.-81C -2'. 7rpel V Op 04P3f.1.5-cTa?-r19 ,_... /.) Mak,- c h.,,-k payab!e 10.: KING CO.(IN Tv r°RI A r,j'.,- r'q-',""r',.4: ,1 . ,, - . •! :, . -. • - • i . . SE'-C:-.:E. .- 14,1_F- P AE NT BE-_,2;•-.)",..1E'':.i DFLINCIUENT IN _r - AF T ER ',1.i',I.FOB E R 31,-,r_. L.-L.---- 88 , . 11 1 9/ 0 49,0 Air qv -• _7: , F:.., .).).t:K.,. .1 ,,!:::'') 4 -,:i ,'':',J rik..V...j ' If,t."..;!'eC,. ar,-,:, fr,e.-,:::'.-,, ,"...:., ', ., . , . DALPAY JAIES W 243333 PC PDX i:_'436 i.-- .„, . RENTON IiiA 98056 ' •$-:...,i, J • ., . •• 1•:,,,, ) 4..,/k- 441. .-- •'-'. f, v v. Tito, ' .. 4'• ..,„.0.44.,,i,,•:, :i.. ...,' D u ii OCTO9 E.fr; 31 . . . __L—..... :4P3C59.0630'70017.1:-!--) - ) - STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED SAFECO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY M,. SAFECO - THIS SSPARER FOR RECORDER'S USE Filed for Record at Request of li l,trJ•I. NAME • ADDHESS j , CITY AND STATE - ' - 30656—CS • O O THE GRANTOR CALVIN C. PATTEN, as his separate estate Cr) for and in consideration of Ten dollars and other valuable consideration . . • r- in hand paid,conveys and warrants to JAMES W. DALPAY and DIANE C. DALPAY, his wife N , _ the following described real estate,situated in the County of King ,State of Washington: That portion of the Southeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 4, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington, lying south of the Renton Issaquah Road or Sunset Highway, ) I EXCEPT the East 280 feet thereof; and EXCEPT the West 470 feet thereof; and EXCEPT the South 385 feet thereof; and EXCEPT that portion conveyed to the State of Washington for SR-900 under King County Recording Number 7104080105. '� KING LOLAIV EXCISE TAX PAID J JAN 281977 Subject to: easements, reservations and restrictions of record, if any. Dated January 3 9 77 t-, , .,. ,,,-..--,, ,...,_.e.,.,„..,_,_,3, ,..-2 i,,--,' ______ Calvin C. Patten (Individual) _.�„,.•*cA . '•, (Individual) �,.<�,�� _ ,_✓ — • . .. t k1.;.if„;: �� E -- -- �� . , IO 1944 CA (0.74) Individual) J TITLE INSURANCE AND TRUST ss. STATE OF CALIFORNIA AOR COMPANY COUNTY OF Los Angeles } SS. TIC On_ January 25, 1977 before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said ✓ Public in and r, State,personally appeared Calvin C. Patten -- - I -_ , ned and sworn, L , known to me to a the person_-_thEivhose name is ___-subscribed President n to a within instrument and acknowledged that__.--__is OFFICIAL $ .AL respectively, of I ex uted the same. _ L uo Commission Expires March 22, 1980 le uses and pur- • Signatur 4�L _ — that M�• CITY OF RENTON xecute the said Flo : EI V D (This area for official notarial sent) orparate seal of at APR 1 t� 1988 Witness my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and BUILDING/ZON1 year first above written. NG DEpT. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at ^.- 1, , ,J ' -,'!1. STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED SAFECO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY SAFECO - THIS SPA,AREBERY FOR RECORDER'S USE Filed for Record at Request of 1_L,ti,;J;�15 NAME — — ADDRESS _ CITY AND STATE 30656—CS CO THE GRANTOR CALVIN C. PATTEN, as his separate estate Cr) for and in consideration of Ten dollars and Other valuable consideration r'" in hand paid,conveys and warrants to JAMES W. DALPAY and DIANE C. DALPAY, his wife N the following described real estate,situated in the County of King , State of Washington: That portion of the Southeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 4, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington, lying south of the Renton Issaquah Road or Sunset Highway, i EXCEPT the East 280 feet thereof; and EXCEPT the West 470 feet thereof; and EXCEPT the South 385 feet thereof; and EXCEPT that portion conveyed to the State of Washington for SR-900 under King County Recording Number 7104080105. K►IVt.i Cour 1Y EXCISE TAX PAID JAN28;977 � a Pt Subject to: easements, reservations and restrictions of record, if any. Dated January 3 19 77 - I.'' (jt' li . UUi Calvin C. Patten (Individual) l;;Ei.�G • (Individual) C ------------- i0 1944 CA (0-74) Individual) TITLE INSURANCE AND TRUST ss. STATE OF CALIFORNIA ss ATICOR COMPANY COUNTY OF Los Angeles I On_—_January 25, 1977 before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said y Public in and State,personally appeared Calvin C. Patten --- •--- __— ned and sworn, , known to me ito e the person_ th6tvhose name iS subscribed - President - to e within instrument and acknowledged that is _ OFFICIAL respectively, of ex 'used the same. JA:R \<IE E. ! WI NESS mrha and official seal. '� CAMPB LL NorARY PUBLIC — CALIFORNIA nstrument,and PRINCIPAL OFFICE IN ` " LOS ANGELES COUNTY free and volun ' My Commission Expires March 22, 1980 to uses and pur- Signatur L- /mot �L that xecute the said CITY OF RENTON orporate seal of (This area for official notarial seal) atREcovF.r, ,���� Witness my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and qpR year first above written. BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at IL-3 R 3 Ib RENT,, I BUILDING & ZONING DEPA► MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 030 - 88 APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE : R-03D-88 PROPONENT : JIM DALPAY PROJECT TITLE : DALPAY REZONE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE 3. 02 ACRES FROM G-1 TO B-1 . THIS IS A NON-PROJECT REZONE . PROPERTY IS SLOPED: MOST TREES HAVE BEEN CUT; IT IS VACANT. COMP PLAN DESIGNATION IS FOR SINGLE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT. VICINITY IS DEVVELOPED PRIMARILY WITH SINGLE & MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING. SOME COMMERCIAL DEVELOP- LOCATION : MENT EXISTS ON UNION AVE, LOCATED SOUTH OF SUNSET BLVD. WEST OF UNION E . OF SITE . TO : 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : OENGINEERING DIVISION F-1 TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : OUTILITIES ENG , DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU OPARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT OBUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT OPOLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON MAY 16, 1988 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : APPROVED O APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED DATE : SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: DATE CIRCULATED: 5/2/88 COMMENTS DUE: 5/16/88 EFC - 030 - 88 APPLICATION NO(S). Pezone 030-88 PROPONENT: dim Calpay PROJECT TITLE: Dal pay Rezone BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application to rezone 3_O2 acres from (1-1 to R-1 _ This is a non-project rezone. Property is sloped; most trees have been cut; it is vacant. Comp plan deslyndLlon is fur single fdmlly development. Vicinity is developed primdrlly wiLh single & multi-family housing_ Some commercial development exists nn Union Avenue, east of the site. LOCATION: South of Sunset Boulevard, West of Union SITE AREA: 3,02 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Form 4