Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
LUA88-037
• •i 0 CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER Earl Clymer, Mayor Fred J. Kaufman August 15, 1988 To All Parties of Record: To All Parties of Staff Re: Rezone R-037-88 City of Renton, Public Works Department Ladies and Gentlemen: The applicants, the City of Renton and King County, in the .above entitled matter have withdrawn their request to reclassify the subject site. Under the circumstances, this office will dismiss the appeal of the DNS issued for the project by the Environmental Review Committee. This office has not been apprised of what, if any, impact this decision will have on any other permits which may be pending for the site. If this office can be of any further assistance please feel free call. Sincerely, \i< FRED J. FMAN HEARING EXAMINER FJK/dk cc: Mayor Earl Clymer Lawrence Warren, City Attorney City Clerk ERC Members 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2593 %o ® CITY OF RENTON eel PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Richard C. Houghton, Director MEMORANDUM' August 10, 1988 TO: Don Erickson, Community Development FROM: Richard Houghton SUBJECT: R-037-88 - REZONE REQUEST CITY MAINTENANCE SHOP PROPERTY The above-referenced action request in conjunction with the King County Shop property rezone request has been re-evaluated. At this time we request that the rezone application for both properties be withdrawn and put in a hold mode until we can confer with the abutting property owners. Should you have any questions, please feel free to call this office (2569) . L RCH:lf Y CC: Fred Kaufman 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2569 King County Department of Public Works Paul Tanaka, Acting Director 900 King County Administration Bldg. 500 Fourth Avenue Seattle,Washington 98104 (206) 296-6500 , ,� CITY of RENToN '% ); August 9, 1988 �G10I�nb`,m Mr. Richard C. Houghton Director Department of Public Works City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 RE: King County Department of Public Works Rezone Application R-037-88 • Dear Mr. Houghton: Thank you for appearing at the Hearing Examiners Public Hearing held August '9, 1988 at 9:00 a.m. in the Council chambers. Pursuant to the results of the . Hearing, please accept this letter as your official notice to withdraw King County Department of Public Works rezone application (R-037-88). Regarding our conditional use permit application (CU-038-88) we desire to con- tinue pursuing the permit process for the construction of phase I. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 296-6504. Sincerely, f4-4414r-444-4A-4-) J. Saltarelli Facilities Manager OJS:pm WP: (DO)L14 cc: Donald Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator Paul Forsander, Director of Planning Arai/Jackson, Architect/Planners Paul Tanaka, Acting Director ATTN: Louis J. Haff, P.E., County Road Engineer Fned Kau6man; ffeavting Exam.ineir. F Law Offices John R.Allison Bruce H.Hurst Russell M.Aoki Lucia E.McDonald rTY7'Y7 Frederick V.Betts S.Thomas Magnuson Jonathan G.Basham Mark M.Miller �� ��``S John P.Braislin Kenneth S.McEwan Martin T.Collier Kim C.Pflueger PA'TTERSON Tracy L.Brown Michael Mines Meredith A.Copeland Richard S.Ralston Paul D.Carey James D.Nelson Michael J.Cranston Karen M.Sutherland Charles W.Davis Dale Riveland Lucy E.Eggertsen Michael B.Tierney A Professional Service Corporation William P.Fite James P.Solimano Paul M.Feinsod Jack R.Wallace 800 Financial Center Francis S.Floyd Thomas A. Sterken Karen J.Feyerherm Margaret E.Wetherald 1215 Fourth Avenue Steven Goldstein Donald L.Thoreson Joel G.Green Seattle,Washington 98161-1090 Jeffrey C.Grant Christopher W.Tompkins David L.Hennings Of Counsel Telecopier:(206)343-7053 Carl H.Hagens Livingston Wernecke Martinus L.Johnson,Jr. John C.Patterson (206) 292-9988 Ingrid W.Hansen Richard S.Lowell August 1, 1988 _ v. Mr. Fred Kaufman - F ., WIE Renton Hearing Examiner cam; �" - 6th Floor, 200 Mill Avenue South )..�9� Renton, WA 98055 10 100 igtx RE: City of Renton -- Public Works Ow 0' Rezone of Public Works Facilities 1�M .R�N'S ECF-037-88 R-037-88 Dear Mr. Kaufman: - We represent Thomas McMahon, the owner of the property directly to the southwest of the property which is the subject of the above-referenced proposal. Despite the fact that our client' s property is adjacent to the subject property, he did not receive notice of the Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) , which was apparently issued on July 13, 1988 and was to have been published on July 18, 1988 . Accordingly, we are requesting an extension of the deadline for filing an appeal of this DNS. In the alternative, in order to protect our client' s interests, we hereby notify you that we wish to appeal the DNS. The grounds for this appeal include, without limitation, the lack of proper notice to our client of the DNS and the Building and Zoning Department' s determination that the proposal will not have a probable significant adverse impact on traffic along the streets and highways serving the proposal site. An Environmental Impact Statement should be required to adequately discuss the . adverse traffic and transportation effects of the proposal. Please find enclosed our check in the amount of $75 .00 to cover the filing fee of this appeal. Very t my yours, Afe...•••• 1/171:":6,tr..-...-..... Karen J. Feyerherm KJF:klm Enclosure cc: Renton Building and Zoning Department Mr. Thomas McMahon 0 King County Department of Public Works Paul Tanaka, Acting Director 900 King County Administration Bldg. 500 Fourth Avenue Seattle,Washington 98104 (206) 296-6500 CIT'r o. RENTToN August 9, 1988 (,' U '' nG���� Fr L'iJPlf .77. _�; T. Mr. Richard C. Houghton Director Department of Public Works City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 RE: King County Department of Public Works Rezone Application R-037-88 Dear Mr. Houghton: Thank you for appearing at the Hearing Examiners Public Hearing held August 9, 1988 at 9:00 a.m. in the Council chambers. Pursuant to the results of the Hearing, please accept this letter as your official notice to withdraw King County Department of Public Works rezone application (R-037-88). Regarding our conditional use permit application (CU-038-88) we desire to con- tinue pursuing the permit process for the construction of phase I. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 296-6504. Sincerely, fJ. Saltarelli Facilities Manager OJS:pm WP: (DO)L14 cc: Donald Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator Paul Forsander, Director of Planning Arai/Jackson, Architect/Planners Paul Tanaka, Acting Director ATTN: Louis J. Haff, P.E. , County Road Engineer Peed Kaufman; Heating ExamineJL • 0 King County Department of Public Works Paul Tanaka, Acting Director 900 King County Administration Bldg. 500 Fourth Avenue Seattle,Washington 98104 (206) 296-6500 CIr/ R.NaO J�,.....� itn 1 .; 1 ; R:3 5 �J t g‘ad'at,0 August 9, 1988 uw LI! ® Mr. Richard C. Houghton Director Department of Public Works City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 RE: King County Department of Public Works Rezone Application R-037-88 Dear Mr. Houghton: Thank you for appearing at the Hearing Examiners Public Hearing held August 9, 1988 at 9:00 a.m. in the Council chambers. Pursuant to the results of the Hearing, please accept this letter as your official notice to withdraw King County Department of Public Works rezone application (R-037-88). Regarding our conditional use permit application (CU-038-88) we desire to con- tinue pursuing the permit process for the construction of phase I. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 296-6504. Sincerely, f42:5411-41"4-1-&) J. Saltarelli Facilities Manager OJS:pm WP: (DO)L14 cc: Donald Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator Paul Forsander, Director of Planning Arai/Jackson, Architect/Planners Paul Tanaka, Acting Director ATTN: Louis J. Haff, P.E. , County Road Engineer Feed Kaufman; Hearing Fxam,invt. CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA COMMENCING AT 9 : 00 A.M. ,_ TUESDAY, AUGUST 9, 1988 COUNCIL CHAMBERS, SECOND FLOOR, RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING The applications listed are in order of application number only and not necessarily the order in which they will be heard. Items will be called for hearing at the discretion of the Hearing Examiner. DOUGLAS PRELLWITZ Continuation of public hearing to review a revised application for preliminary plat approval to allow a thirteen (13) lot single family subdivision on 2 .965 acres of property. Property located in the 2300 block of N.E. 13th Place and 2225 N.E. 16th St. (ECF-10-87; PP-013-87) DAN SWANSON SHORT PLAT Application for Short Plat approval to subdivide approximately 0.86 acre into four (4) single family residential lots. Located at the intersection of N.E. 13th Place and Camas Avenue N.E. (SH-PL-057-88) CITY OF RENTON, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, KING COUNTY PROPERTY REZONE Application to rezone a 36 acre parcel of property G-1, General Use to P-1, Public Use. Subject property is a contiguous 36 acre site, including a parcel owned by the City of Renton which is addressed on the 3500 block of N.E. 2nd Street and a parcel owned by King County addressed at Monroe Avenue N.E. ECF-037-88; R-037-88 CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA COMMENCING AT 9 : 00 A.M. , TUESDAY, AUGUST 9, 1988 COUNCIL CHAMBERS, SECOND FLOOR, RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING The applications listed are in order of application number only and not necessarily the order in which they will be heard. Items will be called for hearing at the discretion of the Hearing Examiner. DOUGLAS PRELLWITZ Continuation of public hearing to review a revised application for preliminary plat approval to allow a thirteen (13) lot single family subdivision on 2 . 965 acres of property. Property located in the 2300 block of N.E. 13th Place and 2225 N.E. 16th St. (ECF-10-87; PP-013-87) DAN SWANSON SHORT PLAT Application for Short Plat approval to subdivide approximately 0. 86 acre into four (4) single family residential lots. Located at the intersection of N.E. 13th Place and Camas Avenue N.E. (SH-PL-057-88) CITY OF RENTON, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, KING COUNTY PROPERTY REZONE Application to rezone a 36 acre parcel of property G-1, General Use to P-1, Public Use. Subject property is a contiguous 36 acre site, including a parcel owned by the City of Renton which is addressed on the 3500 block - of N.E. 2nd Street and a parcel owned by King County addressed at Monroe Avenue N.E. ECF-037-88; R-037-88 BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING August 9, 1988 APPLICANT: City of Renton - Richard C. Houghton - Director of Public Works FILE NUMBER: R-037-88 LOCATION: City of Renton Shops at 3505 N.E. Second Street; King County Shops, Monroe Avenue N.E. at N.E. 2nd Street A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: Application for a non-project, programmatic rezone of a parcel of property approximately 36 acres from G-1, General Use, to P-1, Public Use. This property is presently developed with King County and City of Renton Public Works Shops. Future applications are planned to enable expansion of existing Public Works facilities. B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record: City of Renton 2 . Applicant: City of Renton - Richard C. Houghton, Director of Public Works. 3. Existing Zoning: G-1, General Use 4. Existing Zoning in the Area: G-1, General; R-1, Single- family residential; R-2, Low-density, multi-family residential; R-3 , Medium- density multi-family residential; R-4, High- density, multi-family residential; T - mobile home park; B-i Commercial; L-1, Light Industrial; P-1, Public Use. 5. Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Public/Quasi-Public Use 6. Size of Property: 36 acres 7. Access: Monroe Avenue N.E. ; N.E. Second Street 8. Land Use: This property is presently developed with King County and City of Renton Public Works Shops. 9. Neighborhood Characteristics: North: Property is developed with single-family residences, a mobile home park, commercial and light industrial uses. Renton Vocational School and Greenwood Cemetery are located in this area.. There is also vacant property. / BUILDING AND ZONING 1 ARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO- i'HE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING August 9, 1988 Page 2 East: Property is developed with a mobile-home park. South: Property is developed with residential uses and public uses. West: There is a limited amount of commercial development. Much of the property is vacant, and could be developed, with a variety of general, commercial and light industrial uses. C. HISTORICAL/BACKGROUND: Action File Ordinance Date Annexation N/A 2249 April 25, 1966 Annexation N/A 3143 December 9, 1976 Conditional Use 003-82 March 9, 1982 Conditional Use 070-83 December 2, 1983 D. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1. Utilities a. Water: Property is served by a twelve (12) inch line along N.E. 2nd Street, which links to twelve (12) inch and eight (8) inch lines on the northern portion of the property. There are no water lines on the southern portion of the property; Water lines of twelve (12) inches and eight (8) inches run to the eastern boundary of the southern portion of the property. b. Sewer: Property is served by twelve (12) inch lines along Monroe Avenue N.E. beginning at N.E. 2nd Street and continuing south to the property line at Maple Valley Highway. Eight (8) inch lines run along N.E. 2nd Street. Six (6) and eight (8) inch lines run south at the eastern perimeter of the property from N.E. 2nd Street. c. Storm Water Drainage: Storm Drainage on this property is accomplished through infiltration/percolation. 2. Fire Protection: Provided by the City of Renton as per ordinance requirements. 3 . Transit: Not applicable 4. Schools: Not applicable 5. Recreation: Not applicable E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1. Section 4-704 G-1, General Zone 2 . Section 4-710 P-1, Public Use 3. Section 4-3014 (C) , Change of Zone Classification (Rezone) BUILDING AND ZONING ''ARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT HEARING EXAMINER -. PUBLIC HEARING August 9, 1988 Page 3 F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT: 1. Comprehensive Plan Compendium, March 1986, Environmental Policies Element (I) , page 8. 2. Comprehensive Plan Compendium, March 1986, Governmental Policies Element (X) , page 26. 3. Comprehensive Plan Compendium, March 1986, Area Specific Policies - Northeast Renton, page 55. G. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1. The applicant, City of Renton Public Works Department, seeks approval for a non-project, programmatic rezone of a parcel of property approximately 36 acres from G-1, General Use, to P-1, Public Use. This property is presently partially developed with King County and City of Renton Public Works Shops. There are plans for future expansion of the maintenance services. King County Master Site Plans have been submitted to City files; City of Renton Master Site Plans have not yet been completed. No time frame for full development is identified at this time. 2 . Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43 .21(C) , 1971, as amended) the Environmental Review Committee, the responsible official issued a Determination of Non-Significance on July 18, 1988. 3. Section 4-3014 (C, i) lists three criteria that the Hearing Examiner is asked to consider along with all other relevant information in making a decision on a rezone application. These include the following: a. That substantial evidence was presented demonstrating the subject reclassification appears not to have been specifically considered at the time of the last area land use analysis and area zoning; or The western section of the subject property was annexed to the City in 1966; the eastern section of the property was annexed to the City in 1976. General Use (G-1) zoning was applied to the property, in each instance, at the time of annexation. The subject property was designated for Public/Quasi Public use in the Comprehensive Plan which was adopted in 1982 . However, no changes were made in land use zoning in the area at that time. There is no information which indicates that the subject property has been specifically evaluated in conjunction with any areal land use analysis since that time. The Long-Term Planning Division has indicated that the Comprehensive Plan designation currently in place continues to be valid. The evidence indicates that the application for rezone, therefore, conforms to the Comprehensive Plan and that the subject property is appropriate for rezoning on the Land Use Map. BUILDING AND ZONING ] ARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TU THE HEARING EXAMINER . PUBLIC HEARING August 9, 1988 Page 4 b. That the _property is potentially classified for the proposed zone being requested pursuant to the policies set forth in the Comprehensive Plan and conditions have been met which would indicate the change is appropriate; or The subject property has been extremely stable with respect to zoning, development and use since the original designation at annexation in 1966 and 1976. Land use actions have been confined to those related to addition of new structures/services and expansion of existing uses related to the City of Renton Public Works Facilities and King County Public Works Facilities. In general, there has been increased and diverse development in the area, including public uses, commercial uses, office uses, and residential uses. The Comprehensive Plan indicates that this trend will continue and intensify. Public utilities, street improvements and public services are adequate to serve the site and other developments presently located in the area. These amenities can be improved upon to accommodate new developments. c. That since the last previous land use analysis of the area zoning of the subject property, authorized public improvements, permitted private development or other circumstances affecting the subject property have undergone significant and material change. Reclassification of the subject property to conform to the Comprehensive Plan designation would be consistent with the City's present development goals, and current as well as likely future development trends. While the present application is for a non-project, programmatic rezone, the proposed reclassification would allow future development of public services on this site which would, in turn, enhance the quality of public services to the City and to adjacent King County communities. (Note: While the proposed rezone would allow uses which are now classified as conditional uses to become principally permitted uses, all developments will be subject to site plan review; site plan review will ensure that the applicant is required to provide on-site and off-site improvements to mitigate against impacts from such development. ) Generally, existing public utilities and services (e.g. electricity, telephones, fire service, police service, water mains, sewer lines) are adequate to serve this site and the local community. Storm drainage on the site is accomplished through an infiltration system. The rezone action will not effect any utilities or services. With future development, the applicant can and will be required to implement mitigation measures, to improve utilities and storm drainage management systems as appropriate for any proposed development. 4. The final test to determine whether a rezone is appropriate is to address the question of timeliness. Is it appropriate to rezone the subject property at this time? The subject property is located in an area which generally includes a mix of uses: public uses (King County and City of Renton Public Service Facilities, Renton Vocational Institute, Mt. Olivet Cemetery, Greenwood Cemetery) , commercial uses, BUILDING AND ZONING I ARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TC ZHE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING August 9, 1988 Page 5 residential uses. There are also large tracts of undeveloped property abutting the subject property and in nearby areas which are available for development. The Comprehensive Plan designates this property for Public/Quasi Public Use. A rezone would permit uses which are consistent with the type and level of neighborhood developments which are now present and which are anticipated to occur. A rezone would facilitate the development of services on this site to better serve the existing community, and to accommodate future development anticipated in the Northeast Section of Renton. 5. Representatives of City department have been generally accepting of the application to rezone. The Public Works Department, Building and Zoning, Policy Development and the Fire Prevention Bureau have recommended that the applicants be required to enter into an agreement with the City, in conjunction with any future development, to participate in improvements to utilities, roadways and public services, as required by the City in order to ensure adequate services to the site and to the surrounding community. H. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION: Based upon the above analysis, it is recommended that the Hearing Examiner recommend to the City Council the approval of the rezone to the P-1 (Public Use) zone, file R-037-88. Approval subject to the following condition: 1. The applicants shall be required to enter into an agreement with the City to participate in improvements to utilities, roadways and public services at the time of future development as required to ensure adequate services to the site and to the surrounding community. . :.0)FENI T 3.-.=_1 1;„J.;: r i, 7.J.'.; .7. . ;kti, 1.,,,_ ma.,A...,, R . 2. .. : d: ' i � Mq • R 3 ,,D50R❑I S _l.^ }.C;\ „f:�1 :": •Y --�\ _ .-••,,lf ., B- 1 , L ''r ,t,nU7l • 5 r �-f i LM.I�:. ITT •R-4 G-1 . Al I 1 ; �� ;' A. r1 .1Lr RY , ! • G-1� ti L-1 • 1. i. hi-3 ,;4, , , 1 . ", 1 I~1 ` , b.' /4/- I)! 1T i 1 ,,A, 1 , ,o, 1 , , v' 1 '.n 1 . ,2, 1 • 1 ,,,, G-1 I 1 • • r 1 1 1 . : , 1 1 / . CITY OF RENTON, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 414 ° . KING COUNTY PROPERTY REZONE ' R-037-88 , ECF-037-88 K; APPLICANT CITY OF RENTON,, PUBLIC WORKS TOTAL AREA 36 ACRES PRINCIPAL ACCESS 2nd STREET EXISTING ZONING G-1 , GENERAL USE • EXISTING USE PUBLIC WORKS MAINTENANCE SHOPS PROPOSED USE PUBLIC WORKS MAINTENANCE SHOPS & FIRE DEPT. TRAINING FOR KING CO . & CITY OF RENTON/DISTRICT COURT TRANSFER STATION & HEALTH COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN DEPT, COMMENTS SUBJECT PROPERTY IS A CONTIGUOUS 36 ACRE' SITE , INCLUDING A PARCEL OWNED BY THE CITY OF RENTON WHICH IS ADDRESSED ON THE 3500 BLOCK OF N.E . 2nd ST. AND A PARCEL OWNED BY KING COUNTY ADDRESSED AT MONROE AVENUE N.E . - ; ' . . ,:,-,iu: .-. . • V\i';' 1 1 ......m.dustrial • 'r • e, Ni,:..:••,. • 1. ;•,...,.e., •c ' I ."•' - • •••• . i • LW , • •J •..•::•',. ..A F.6..C.S.,••,.. •, i•i J '..-7';:".*; ., L ,•-s...r%cr..• •o-.....•-• :uring Park P/ .- - ..-,A..::,,... 7.-....,.-.:..,,,:.., •(.2;:.!IP,..••',.....,.- ,,-,•....:7:, k )Ie Option ./,' / ' -o , •if..-c, ,, • ., ::::,.:,...-... •.,,:::::: • ..,7,•:•e,.. ..,::::• ;.•• :,.,•;_•.....r;,...,........„:,. .. ••. '''....tr C,V,',:, ,.,:z,C,. „p• ,.l..,,:•,,,•.•4V.a,',,,.,,'IT:......,.. :Z.4:' '..', '17,"..C.;,.,',".,;••••.:,:•;.•.c 4.:-....Z:•',•=s• :•••• .... ..••••• ••••,••••:-•.°`.0:,r:T..;',.:'•';'.''.('..••..0:v. •••• ..e.:.•.'7.;:gr:V•••:••c:g.:•:,•.c...T., .•,.„. . . ..,,,.. -- I 1 985 / - , iiii -47...1,3•,.- •,?..,:;:•;;',,-.'mii•::::*??..1:2:1.‘,1:: :',!ii;::,?;. *,•: !linteilll lci:ft:,-7;i: 0-•;'•,i.??../..?:••,t1, , 0.c,:':•:!4i..•:;r4,.. .„:,4;FY,•;:::i•;•Y-Tt„-f-fg:•4111016611" "" "‘•',,:e.'...:.....,:•:r... .,. :.. . . - - •.• - •,;,• t s Iih p • - .6.(••••••C•.'d....•:.6J,'••C:••r•••••e • .:•6•••;•-.::0....r.....=0,••••••' ,•••••••••••••+.e.•',.0.••••:. .•:::r %, '.•''' c' ''''':'...-.•5';'.tZ:•-•C,G;-'•-••..:K.•f:••*-(•;v;:•:••2.5j.-''3,','••':••• •" •• 1.1 :lig 1•A k ...„ . ..,....„.. „ •,.,,., ..;:3,, Q2,,,,,, . -• -w.m ;t.,c - - ; ,,•G..,-••- ° :•;,:;-':::•,...-7..:4,i •••:. . ° "•.,7::•.., •,, A - --- -I:, , ... tip"1 -II • t•,....;.,:....;.,..4„. ,,,•• 7., ,,. -A.. •44. ,.c,-; • -- -,- • z,...: ,,,.....„........0.00:000. :,.N diffr.N. • ,..,\it.,,,it -.10. , .::..,•,.. f-„ Irill= ' \el> •••r • ••• 6 ••••::.•Z',t• (.1:.;:t.•:....-7.• •: MIS • ‹.4 •.• ...:••••::..';'1.'4 -9.. , Illni vs •. ..:. WMIIII. eati LAKE .4 v .,,,$. 4, :•::. :i*::•:•,1,,r1:•:.::..::....:.::,...,...,..•.••::.‘•:::.....,„1. ,..:... :•:::::.:....:i::. .,.„ ..,,,.....„. • .. , ..s.:. ...:... ::::: 0,1r:::i. ,1-, ,,, . .1... II,'CV • .V..,.= % ''. •'!" •::::: 40.°000°000°.: .:: :..: . i*. ,1; , i . •i:i:i::.•:•:•:•:. IV . 4% ',V.'' : '• SHINGTON , ,J., „.1 -...c. ..... ._._ . .... ..,„. ., ---,Air Ira,. ... , .'`,i'•,,t,341811*Doe N.' moo ..:•:.:::::::::: Una''......• " 'er. " Ill [!TX7q 1 11:1111V ---. • • ' • ...7411t7lInna., •''' 4:',0` It! -i-7',---:-T1 sou ' 11101111111 :•:•!':':''''' nilliiIIII0 .NNW/ • IIIIIIIIIIIimmfini - • -•- • 1•1"1:'•••• It ' •0000• I MiraI 1111111111O1 . i •••••11, . •'ft•••:41,".-•, N:i 1.°0°0°N.r-4-i _Jan:: t3 I g!..ILVIII P.1111 .c••••• • •-•„.,- -3 MN .•00000 • •iiinin.,... s s. !Wang S„, alma c 4 • --. '••. No ' • -....:--- :......--....4 -- - • • I, •• c , • • e 0 ir•-- '- ...• .;.......:.:•:•,..:•••• •mg.iiiii iii:i:i:i:::i:ii:.::i:::i:iii:: - • ./ ••• ••• • •A,-,„,...ND ' ,4144104111111 :•:.:.::::::::••••••• •••••.4 WWWW A M!iv c ., • • • • • • WI 6.11", ..ii ,•.0 oc.c, : . ___.__.• . • ••• • • • •. .. :::i:K:::i::::::.:.::p.a.,. .......... rw ,.:::., .__...._•- •........... • • • • • • • • ..,,, - .:i:i:::::: .aiiiii 14,purammi' um i\i, 801111.! c •:.::::::.v.•.• ki • V • • • • • • • • • ", ai::i FM171111 I .::.:.'. -‘. lin • ::::::::::. •0°.6.1. • • • • • • • • • • ,• • .0 I.:- OM IL .::i: ISBONI/150,.......A. .... ! Ic •:::ilif t. •••••••.e.e.4.•.•.•.•.%•.•• .-, . :iiii!iiiiiiilitapme- ..:%reiiirim Mina ,. . :*q.,..,%. • • • • • • e • • • • • • • •, i!:i0:::f• t '''::::*:'.fiiiiiiri"•4 \ ----10 LI • IIIMM : , .• 0 1 L•..... 1 • .__. 0 • • igggggg:1A ••••••• • •••••••, • • .. :::M: W.4.7....7.crei;c.1 EN ..0.0000pg• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • .:. ::i::ii: grimew.l. ...i.m.•••/ ..1 II.4c,°,9ggg9g9,;,ft • • • • • • • • • • • • • '! •: i: b• . • t Iggg,g,iktQ!)et'lt4.• ••••••••••• • • •f• , .• .0. •••••••• ••••••• INN XII,.. ollamak010 11111.117111:-r't '0%°0°0939NocaP. .•.....•.•.•.•.•... • • • • • • • •••••••.• :,.,. „k agswil [ral •c,°0•:aortolOrg , ....:.:•:•:•:.:.:•:•:•:•:•. -$..- • • •• • 1••• 1, , ..:::.::.:::::::::.:•:•:.::::::: .4.,... - •,...ogggc, , . • . • • • •• ,__,Irog g go,. k • • • • ••• 1 i ‘ • • • • • .....,. .:.:::::.::::::,.............. •..:•.:.:. . ••••••••• ,:c."... • . VII . • IMMI • •::::K::.' ..::::iiiiiiiiiiigo. :::,.....• .,..2. . .5:0 -, • • • I '-'51,...aa..-. iii,-1.0z,,0 0 .8•0; .4• • • • • s • e • :••,t. • k hAIR •:.:::. :.mmiso I ,..,......... -........--.7t...1.„........: 1.i.:gogo°0 gi',;' . ' 11 ' ri::::::::-.i:-.R;F.7,77:hio; ••••••.••• .;:-J. I, ' .1•1•g000% 000: 6 0 0 0 I ..,::::::::;;;;::::::::::::::::::inggig ,11 0 . 45 . ,! -.1,1; gogo 00% 4,, • • • •;:ii::ii:5:uiiK•olielp • • • • • p VI 11.111.IIII.- 4 .°0• ASSIS. 16216,A. ‘. 1 tt i 16t6 A • 0. • •0:0 ...................... assmiiiiiiiiil •o.•o• :.:.:•:•:•:•:•:.:•:•:•:.:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:. N••••••••••••• :1 ic:0:0:0•.'00°00:0: iiiiiiitignii •inn inta 111 . .•:•••• :googogil000goo.... ..... . . r-igg Nal. •ti • • I ilt gOglgo6ogog. ' &0,,q,c);./1111101e, I••,01,•,,IP.), J.71 WOK%" •:.•:••,.:.•••••:':;:::;•:. ,, , irags,gg9ggpgd9ggigog: W,g9g4': Iti). ------44-7,• -km .1,11 ;:.: '1::::iiii gogogogoe-pgog,t M•41iNi11119,g,$§11...1.• it; 9 .62;:',..7.:i:i:::41:::.::::ii::::::::::::::.:,:;• • -1,,,' .rri,.=„iitro:.:0000.000000........,1-1,6"lial:"'" g Is. ggggeggggggg%kk,F-c.Tigs kit ... • . .... aim ...6*,::::%::,:*;• • .:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:.:*** ••••:'''•' • 0000.1.0 0 0 0 0°0°0°07: ii• " I :1::::::•::::•\•77711111.17 I•.• 56 M.' our, •• I„, .4:i:MI:::A ".. •:::::::::::::::::.' .•::::::::::::: • • . ,o 0 o 0.0000000000• ... -,1.1•••I•mi .::::::::::::K;i:::1::*K:i:::i klEigniggggg4V411 .111.1 ogogogogo '°;,% •whr;i. .C ,p's• ital ,. •ii:::•••• ....:::::iiiiiiiiggi '• ••• •O°093931'ocaVoliffo°0*. IIIll ....::Tiji* .irgi IME:i:0''''' • • ...:.::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ,4:83. •ocip000t.930000000000o0009,. •••••••••.......:.:.:.:.x.x.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.......:.:.:.:.:.:............. , Z' • •X::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: .00• •000.1.00o0oo000• ••••• .0 •:::::::::::::::•' •••:•:::::::::•:•:::::::::::::•:•:::::::•: Fi- . c'e:-°...dheli.:714, Eg ernr Ak. '..;,,,.ti•-.'-,''.•,...4••,. :i:i:iiiiiiii:i:iiii::ii:ii:iiii:i. •,0 ... 00 M 00.:•0"00•"• :::::*::. Too:. ".- . : • ..t.'AI:ilbaditillingt .R4491Pre011i MM---• I Ai w , .•-•,•.°0 '.• •:i:iiiiiiiiii:::Rig ;WV c,i' ..0:: , 1 tqi:•::.°. . • .Alivimml . __ : ,..,==. 1 41177 fl wArp.:11 00.0 . :::::::::::::::::•::::::::::::: .• • • . . •• •• •0• lit•:•:•:•..,•:.:•:•:• • ,• •,dfigtirlai IZEI-;•; --c, o• I IiiiiiiiVAIPP7' •'." r 4.11"Mo°0% 1'• •:::i*:.::::::::ii: :::i:i:i *.' *.* : '.. ".0°•* o'0°'•4 ::::-!•::::::::i:::: ! 0 .••••••••••w•.r.r•In;,0.,;00000000 ,,,„.„,m, ,.,. ,ror: .. ilv .i. . •0000. •,: .:::i:K:i:::::x:i:K:i: .t..:-- -----.. .1.'„:. ..0 .00.. 0%1 :••:•:::::•::::::::::: ' 188gruit 00000gogogq:. Iming_i Ceslfr ..J.;4t:' .•f..kt.... . f:. 1 •••°0970°0° I. 11:M:.:.:,:::::.:.:. -- ' • 188a,,„,,,,,,,aii,•11111.11:•tri.:!io-.,,„y ,..-#.,v6c..... ., ."""""•.•• •.::::::::::::::::::::::::::. •..4p,.3.,,,,., itioN'may o o 0 o , iluvarimm,I.°:. .....e. •....‘.,,,,,r\ , , ,s561,_minnembi.g=-.-....,,:..or of;•••••4•111;ray; -' ...,411!4••,;•'''. Qiiktirr.. Iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii: Pr. •__,:, t .,...0d. .) :•i :kg::i _ 4 1 MM. 4.....•••••Li:• our nu"-R•.0 - ...... , ..„wI i . ---- "........."""."... ,,. 4.....MMMMMMMMMMM MINIM IIIIMIII 111111114 00" „".. -"•611•/..4.1c.•r . •,:::,::••F ••••••,,••••• • ' a•• r' ; i, :::•:::•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•: " O."dliirallifillTh iii!ii'kin!iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii ''17,13..;,t•Av.. ,.. ""(11 if,„4 Ai., .6; 1J*1:44. ,::rgl'..;A.:. ',"1/::..1••'4 •T' •,-"''6'i,;:td! .:.:*:***:•* mipigiall. ,'''.,1.ill winuevloat.rn .•.......•.•.•.•.....•-. alimme.:11.1:iinir F.,?x.:;,•.• ..,Incp.,,,,psk-o. :',-4,,,.:ii.ir..;•:,?.,-, r.„-...,,:; ;.,....z , ..-,.,' - -:°: • %:::::::::::::::::: A 11011111111111M•. :AN mum nsomps•r e •••.• •Vrt`••etx'' (.., OM 'V r' ra •P••'''' •'`• `.;'''" ''''' '7• ' - '••••"' .•J G ,.1, • ........;;"Vaiiir I•t. '''.4--' ''.;'''''.n..% 'W*.e,',4X-'ry; vetak ,.-..',5•,, „'...; ••••;4,%::),i''..; • ' •' '''''r -.. :,- ••••••:•:•: Er"- ,: -...1f, i :g::+.1?:P.- idgrwie •,0.',.C5? il,t•.'Vr'lq, (.: 4:1111e d•/-4i4:f)'•-• ' %,..!.. i'ml..: ,‘ ....,, .,0 • "II' • .im....ral V....:::M315 ILE lb;41S, k' .-:.,... ;,:,,. ,ffp•-lc- ' --1:, 11,i, f .1114k111111W" . •-: , c'PC i- ".•••),•,,,.;."re;:c'cy•,;fiki • ''71 e("it ...;„.1. •`?•-•• . .J. •ri •L•., OW 110111 1...,,,,,,,„...m.mup p.- ..,,,,..),:„-Ivo,:, •,, •••,..,,i , -- - -6.,:-•41,1,40ozult, ,„„, ,, ,-.q. tip:•-,,. fik.•.•:,,....y.,rc%7R.otr". •••••' wasiv 1 MONONA 1 .4, • .'":0";P::`'..fii.:•••'`;‘,,,.. - -- •'...7`• . ',.. ,......:4.1---lirri.4 •1 . .•'.-.0 '.,-,•*.rf-!.. .:. ,.;ii.:;•:,..,,,d•..-:,•0.., •• , ,. i li, ;. •MINE...iiiii Imre kirpintittp ..geiN , aN,","3,...!••:.,!.)'it'....c.0.,"•.:,'4,'”.'....,.....'..VI.'''iliP•, 1 gir No , • '' 't -:^e•c.....t.7;1"..t: ;•::'. LIN MMMMM AM,x...:;..........,:1,•••••••••:••••*••••• call '4.1" ' •••n•'t'••••", '• (1 •VI-el- ..,-•-,0.-,'. • , e...n.. • „ ., 'dm,laiiiiiMaliiiiVje.• ' Ilk. . c?;,)b.,., .i,••c,0...III .i`n,..,...1,) ,.(v.,..;...,. •s N'•••,,,411e• . . iiiiiiii ••`,'• 'ili. •'n,'• ''."•••il -....w, ... .• --.%.• 061-.- .'•- lg.• '- 'op. v. '• 1•2..q:•,:•..t,\:*.cl.0'•EN m•.'3"rf?:••:•"•?)o• •ri'N.:• 44- , . ...ce,,e.: ip •• ..-Atex-k,lezi,ci. I 1:ogo •.:roc.100000.0.. .••••• ,".;.:0&1-'4.c• `,"...ovifi)(0.•<;`: se•V 4. - . ". ' .4!"e'.°0 ••-s.•-,44 ..i17:4J:i,--c: I u 11:* • .11 _..,...)4,,,:tv;=1,,-I,:-(f4;-..0., 1:1 '''&'' ' 411t .-- •q.;6.,<Ceix)*er.r.eolS=d 3.-,",,,,,oi!..,?,,....,. .,...____,,e-• • 1,., tti •- t9.pc..:Iritig;s:ki:44i•.. ::.'", i'l../.. .,•r1S.:...P.' i ;\ "f ....0 ).>.14,..),-..'<•:.-.4;13I . k LAND USE ELEMENT ,,..,,,,,,, 14. .,.,,,.,,,,v,,A.c,i,,,,„-.5,0-4,..e,it),to. . • ' /":1(Y'VCis.".' ' NI .' •::•:•:•:.............. •Ve.,7,0*,','•'..t.i k,".3%,.• k_ 7:i '''''')%'*7•`S.C.k5.:' •-.•017.-„sflex 4ry if, . i:::::::i •t•,, -••Single Family Commercial .••••••• y:b..vt 1.i li4,:;e1''a0•.i.c!.A',l0 it ',4-. :8 Ca („ •C/,f'..1"?"6'N. 0.' •'I: • ''...• ' iti .;,,,Z4 4.-;,%:.:.z.o,:t,)1 0°0 0 0• •ceiel•J:'•1•.1.c+1'.••. \::,.•, • •n'.*0:(.1•40:A.:',",c, •000cpoo.. :*:':'::::::::::::::• Low Density .3.',,..1.:,•••,•0•••.,,., -,.$90:06;...,.''.).11'.3 i•'•0• ..:.:-::•:•:.:.:•:.:•. Office / Office Park .. ,,,,.. -,,,,.:!...••;,, .,4:„..v..0e,)P'3 1"."1,';‘)!I• e. •::::::::::::::::•:. Multi-Family . - 41 ‘q.c.•. 0 0• •3 4''''tif:(?1' 1'''',4',5''0?le. ;....'Vt.,.r.1.• 0. Poca•.• dur;'•v)'..)-•/-,5 ? 5..^'-')co...<?•••',.0. ‹.... ••:••:•c, . .1,44a i 22..,.t..• ,,•9:•,:,•••;*. .,,,v;. ,ec?.,, 00000000000000C ,, Cis:91 •0 00000000000000 00• ;! 3,Vritti: ...,!;,.•:•1':,,,:,.0•,. .,f“Medium Density Li l4„•....,0'; Public/ Quasi-Public ; r. ,,, . . ..0.00.00000... . -,•00. ,,,,•,.,,,,c,:,,,,I,Q. : 11 t:%::'•V ii::‘,1,7, o^, 0000000C 4,,. ••••41.6,, • -•• ..• . v. - .°:I.:VA\4.P:••6"'"C11‘6.1'' •••);(1.•0%.( •.s 1''''1? ;.1'41%1" cl• • • . , ., •. • . .S•7.-6 -•!..Z.6 :MnMi High Density sltrt,N, V, C---, ) •1 : ,.,• ....................... Light Industrial ..... . Multi-Family .. , . .,• • i 4. • 110 • • l'..C. 6C., •'•:7(...':". • Recreation • ••••• Heavy Industrial 000'00000 00.000V0009.4 l0.l..M..0 I• i r301.0°,°30°:00000°°0°°0°°0%0 •00000 .0• ..' '• 000000000000.0•• I : 1 .- 0 0 0 0 0 0°0°0°0°0 111• 0000000000000, 0000000000000 D000000000..04 NO000000000000000.00000.y ,0: , 311•;1.,',8'.i• ---- • , no0.00.000.0%, ••••000., •fli• Greenbelt c-PA..?.s•f•n . -------- Manufacturing Park; -1,-_-_-_- 00 ....0...o.s, 000.0D1 ...: •00... ..••,,,..- , o _-_-_-_- 0.00 .• • . ..0.0••0, , •0.000000 / Multiple Option • CITY OF RENTON • DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO.: ECF-037-88 APPLICATION NO(S): R-037-88 • PROPONENT: City of Renton, Public Works Department LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Subject property is a contiguous 36 acre site, including a parcel owned by the City of Renton which is • addressed on the 3500 block of N.E. 2nd Street and a parcel owned by King County addressed at Monroe Avenue N.E. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Building & Zoning Department The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of an expanded environmental checklist and preliminary site plan on file with the lead agency. There is no comment period for this DNS. Responsible Official; Environmental Review Committee Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator • Building & Zoning Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 APPEAL: You may appeal this determination in writing to Renton Hearing Examiner no later than August 1, 1988. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. PUBLICATION DATE: July 18, 1988 • DATE OF DECISION: July 13, 1988 • ZiSIGNATelson &PM � Larry .. g•r Building Manager Planni : Divisiol anag:/ 1Iichard C. I-I •ghton Public Works Director I I NU1SL1(r NUKK;) UL-1'Ak I l'ILW I SCHEDULED ERC DATE : n ENGINEERING DIVIS, ) n TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : • VIUTILITIES ENG , DIVISION n FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU n PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT n POLICE DEPARTMENT n POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Ti OTHERS : • 2OMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Ps 5: 00 P .M. ON MAY 26 , 1988 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : ( 1IL1T`/ FEP7 • APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS n NOT APPROVED T►E Ears T Iac., FAciL1 Tic.,5.. .AN7) ?tom P26 P0509_CoeVEcUPcieltitrAREr zoaE z of �E ( o va ARL-4rc i?or6CTrJN MCA . O'41,62 T�JC Flio/�oSC;') APA 02o,N9,vCZ ,oN0 771 P:oPosc:O I-1 Z0-1 T ZoNG 19ES/6A/4 Ton/S TIJeSC GcVGLoPNre TS WO No-r dC Acco,4/L0, IF TO(S Pe.iPA(z r1 Oh 6 To (L Zo'JFO ro p-I zoom, 7N5-N T G- EXrsTiNG ?1 S pr5 /S FwTK'G /.7.1fejt ° 1 CA'T 5aotit.n 4l; St-t6Jcx'T To "MU- Foci-o•..,rnr& eO JrO1 r o'/S S ) TANtGS g6 SECo,%fa' ,G`1 con/A/act I. (NO F.iroe uN.,2v26R.0,0,0 T�NrcS Gr(sr N A6co6 GRouN,i3 AtG)S vJIICUIG 2CGuLATeo SNn57,ailc&5„ ,41'115 uSC: AN/7 STv2GX 51-J014Lo rat, se-co,,,04a1G`/ Con( ( No Fi1u4C s-rrrt,oGv-- Inr •tioNev .DI°'0 p2c`eS 3. ALL m uc' 0a_ t- / 0o'n4 4260 5 5l.IouCO 66 ccW7211,160 ANO 50(10 By.Slwir Y Sc✓F� 4. T?G -Mows FG2 S;.o oM 541cmLn (36 :"'Gar; SO JLunr=OFF wru- acrr p/lp.0,c Tu Soi 1«S ALL a'nicl- 19E6,4t.47O'1S Fon_ zo,46- z or- A PA oaoh c& SNocir o 6& tie 77 ta,r1 A�0'Y. NIOf,nTJen�G k.,/lLcc.S SF1o��cvJ n� InlSrlrc..Ch Ic(1/L 1/` CO,') DATE : 5/26/6 SIGN TURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 • REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : frt. FY-eVenky).fl APPROVED n APPROVED WITH 'CONDITIONS El NOT APPROVED ,��• x'r�f /G 77ta DATE: /3 /.7 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 0 I I REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : r- El APPROVED 0 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ,..--- 0lig: APPROVED I !--:1 ..7/ .--, -/ r 4 / )1- ' 1 C / e-, ,,,, 1;! ..,,,,,.., . e;,t, . - , ' -- -..f: !, , ....-t-v• p- -. c. .--02,..0 e ),) 47- c7s r C3 ""7-• IL - •en. -- . / ).-t : ii2,, ; 12-7(.:? - 71c....› 14-7-p yc- if/1 I ' .. 'd/ ' (2r 4.21/-1 ( ::' ,---•e__ •:;,--7--2 ....5-,,,,.,,';:or,•12-. C/ •,7,,-..cz ,P 71- -- cl - ''''.. . .-.;'-)-,,, , 1./.: 1 *rip ;Or [GNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHOR ZED REPRESENTATIVE ' REVISION 5/1982 ". . Form 182 , \ EVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 0 APPROVED El APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ET NOT APPROVED , .1) De....71A r/ v-A..1;,3cZ-77( 4 , - 7 Lc 2 e._ .3 5‘ ( cej f ^.--g 6:47---- &"--- 7D ' ide_:/.z. ii'0.— Y--e- --c--- - -74 - - / * AI --ro-°Y--1-4-- c----(c.„1,74,- ,K c ( C .' "-- till " otowv--- s ri-v-c..e-...,_• 3) c cri-et:y -i 4,-.) - 1,-/ e i•,-----r Ir7Lf i)-,-- / -.._ ( / 7-I- .. ,43_- ce_e4/4er f-',-e---1-(12 -: 6" i-.1_j' • c.... 6r5 ),,,\..._ A, DATE: /, Ef--- • :C' GNATURE OF DIRECT R R e AUTHORIZEb REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 VIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : \--)01.ic\I -)cNIelopnle.,;t7 APPROVED n APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS „4: 10T APPROVED _ , _ - 4_,,,._i__ _, &-i- Qa., .)__a_cp_ ft__. .) yg-CL6.,...,_e_w2 6-4_ C-91-1-42- ;-e -i..., eir,,7 .... (0)4 -,,c5,... .._ /0 O ,-,---e-a-.^- --\14-6",---,----) _______ (.6--4-- - \A-j S8 -z, 6--t- c,, ,,,-4-9-e-A--- ,(--. ,`- 67,-,:7-- ,• ' . . - - ,... ,...... _• .4,- -fi- - . - ❑, �� APPROVED AP )VED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED yo 0 0 (A LL. L,A.J c, C id ef.0 l� P -,. _ 7--r7 >IGNATUR OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVEDATE, REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 EVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : lZ'�-/ 7 ' /rec`lcG/' i APPROVED n APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS El NOT APPROVED /-ec,024" TGi U• - 1d,.// ( he to-s7•6,. o>jd ,, 7 /l e,/ lc)pr '1 /47.b ,/(//, ,3 X Gii e eac/ a i /46////cf 76 iff.feoJx e/7 - de f c 1/, ��1G��f e ,''y e —C..• DATE IGNATURE DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 lb) Utilities - 1 . COtM1ENTS: PO ic_er • We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional i formation is eeded to properly assess this proposal. 4/V - AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Public Notice NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON,WASHINGTON Audrey Benner ,being first duly sworn on oath states A public hearing will be held by the that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the Second Floor of City Hall, Renton, Wash- ington, on August 9, 1988, at 9:00 a.m. to VALLEY DAILY NEWS consider the following petitions: DOUGLAS PRELLWITZ • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition Continuation of public hearing to review a revised application for preliminary plat Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week. That said newspapers approval to allow a thirteen(13)lot sin- are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six gle family subdivision on 2.965 acres of property. Property located in the 2300 months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published block of N.E. 13th Place and 2225 N.E. in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King 16th St.(ECF-10-87;PP-0113-87 Count Washington.The ValleyDailyNews has been approvedDAN SWANSON SHORT PLAT Y� g as a legal Application for Short Plat approval to newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for subdivide approximately 0.86 acre into King County. four (4) single family residential lots. Located at the Intersection of N.E. 13th Place and Camas Avenue N.E.(SH-PL- The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Kent Edition CITY OF RENTON, PUBLIC WORKS , Renton Edition _—_X_ , Auburn Edition _-____-_, (and not in DEPARTMENT, KING COUNTY PROP- supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers ERTY REZONE Application to rezone a 36 acre parcel during the below stated period.The annexed notice a of property G-1, General Use to P-1, N n t i r P f Public_ -_Hea Hearing public Use.Subject property is a contig- g uous 36 acre site, including a parcel was published on _ owned by the City of Renton which is July-1-y- 2 9-, - 1988 - -- R 30 7 9---- addressed on the 3500 block of N.E. 2nd Street and a parcel owned by King County addressed at Monroe Avenue N.E.ECF-037-88;R-037-88 The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the Legal description of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Building sum of $3 2 .0 0 anAll�nteres ed persons to said petitions are invited to be present at the public hear- ing on August 9, 1988, at 9:00 a.m. to g, express their opinions. Published in the Valley Daily News July 29, 1988.R3079 Account#51067 Subscribed and sworn to before me this 12 thday of_Au_g us t 19 8B Notary Public for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, King County, Washington. VDN#87 Revised 11,86 AII OF R4,4?7.., . NIP I . ,, -g--7; •i' • : P • . :. .•- 0A-4-S,A' o O r. 'V. 'f.',x174,. r O rn • 9 o94, SEPtE,r0 City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner will hold a .. , HEARING . . • pu ,,,,......,:: in CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL ON AUGUST 9, 1988 BEGINNING AT 9 : 00A.M. P.M. ®NCERNING: ' ECF-CITY OOF RENTON 37-88, OPUBLIC WORK DEPART- MENT, KING CO. PROPERTY REZONE . ' APPLICATION TO REZONE' A 36 ACRE PARCEL OF PROPERTY G-1, GENERAL USE, TO P-1, PUBLIC USE. SUBJECT PROPERTY IS A CONTIGUOUS 36 ACRE SITE, INCLUDING A PARCEL OWNED BY THE CITY OF RENTON WHICH IS ADDRESSED ON THE 3500 BLOCK OF N.E. 2ND STREET 'AND A PARCEL ' WHICH IS ADDRESSED AT MONROE AVENUE N.E. ' u L✓I 1 'i i ?fl, 1: a�� $11.):.1.." l':L L:_LI. �.�Oi•�:'�• —� i • r _ 1 Rj8 NOPNk1llS( 1.1 ' tet' I '1, 'I -•ii -.1 Y1 - 411,,.,.. Y .J� JO!A11 JI11,,; 1 • L1:` p_1, PG1 1hl 'T'.R-4 — • J— AP ' G ENJVDOD I ' 1 ' I I ` r1 .1LTtR'f ' ! �;� \-----------\------ L ' .G-1` _ 1 —1 _ ! 13 ;�, I.i.. . .I • I.. , 1-1` I IT • , 1 , I I cJ° . I ' I 1 _ ! I_ __..0ir_.r__n I1 I , I �'' I 1 I I., I 1 II I i ; 1 1 , 1 _ ' 11 _3- -22.\ . , . I I1ITrr.-_'% . GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS: PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE 3500 BLOCK OF N.E. 2ND STREET AND ON • MONROE AVENUE N.E. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED . WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION' . Vinj 0 King County LLit3Y CEVELOPMEW CEPI+RTtrit- Department of Public Works CITY kkx x xo>uxxx OF RENTON 900 King County Administration Bldg. AUG I) 500 Fourth Avenue 5 1988 Seattle,Washington 98104(206) 296-6500 E Cr� LS II t August 5, 1988 Mr. Richard C. Houghton, Director Department of Public Works City of Renton Renton City Hall 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 RE: Public Hearing August 9, 1988 Rezone R-037-88 Dear Mr. Houghton: Pursuant to the referenced Public Hearing, please be cognizant of the minimal traffic impact that will be generated with the construction of Phase I. The only personnel being relocated to the Consolidated Office and Repair Facility (CORF) will be will the Materials Laboratory personnel . The entire staff consists of only (8) employees. Some of these employees will opt to car pool or commute by Metro as a mode of transportation. The relocation is programmed for the first quarter of 1989. Construction of Phase II in the near future will accommodate the relocation of Contract Management and Inspection (CM&I) to (CORF) from the King County Administration Building located in Seattle. The entire staff consists of only thirteen (13) employees. They would share the same transportation oppor- tunities mentioned under Phase I. Should you have any question please feel free to contact me at extension 296-6504. Sincerely, O.J. Saltarelli Facilities Manager OJS:cic (DO)L13 cc: Donald Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator Paul Tanaka, Acting Director Louis J. Haff, P.E. , County Road Engineer _f NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON HEARING EXAMINER_ RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON AUGUST 9, 1988, AT 9: 00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: DOUGLAS PRELLWITZ Continuation of public hearing to review a revised application for preliminary plat approval to allow a thirteen (13) lot single family subdivision on 2 . 965 acres of property. Property located in the 2300 block of N.E. 13th Place and 2225 N.E. 16th St. (ECF-10-87; PP-013-87) DAN SWANSON SHORT PLAT Application for Short Plat approval to subdivide approximately 0.86 acre into four (4) single family residential lots. Located at the intersection of N.E. 13th Place and Camas Avenue N.E. (SH-PL-057-88) CITY OF RENTON, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, KING COUNTY PROPERTY REZONE Application to rezone a 36 acre parcel of property G-1, General Use to P-1, Public Use. Subject property is a contiguous 36 acre site, including a parcel owned by the City of Renton which is addressed on the 3500 block of N.E. 2nd Street and a parcel owned by King County addressed at Monroe Avenue N.E. ECF-037-88; R-037-88 Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Building and Zoning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON AUGUST 9, 1988, AT 9 : 00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. Published: July 29, 1988 Law Offices John R.Allison Bruce H.Hurst Russell M.Aoki Lucia E.McDonald BE.l„z,S Frederick V.Betts S.Thomas Magnuson Jonathan G.Basham Mark M.Miller John P.Braislin Kenneth S.McEwan Martin T.Collier Kim C.Pflueger PA'ITERSON Tracy L.Brown Michael Mines Meredith A.Copeland Richard S.Ralston Paul D.Carey James D.Nelson Michael J.Cranston Karen M.Sutherland Charles W.Davis Dale Riveland Lucy E.Eggertsen Michael B.Tierney A Professional Service Corporation William P.Fite James P.Solimano Paul M.Feinsod Jack R.Wallace 800 Financial Center Francis S.Floyd Thomas A.Sterken Karen J.Feyerherm Margaret E.Wetherald 1215 Fourth Avenue Steven Goldstein Donald L.Thoreson Joel G.Green Seattle,Washington 98161-1090 Jeffrey C.Grant Christopher W.Tompkins David L.Hennings Of Counsel Telecopier: (206)343-7053 Carl H.Hagens Livingston Wernecke Martinus L.Johnson,Jr. John C.Patterson (206) 292-9988 Ingrid W.Hansen Richard S.Lowell August 1, 1988 r� . P i ES Mr. Fred Kaufman Renton Hearing Examiner 1g 6th Floor, 200 Mill Avenue South AUG Renton, WA 98055N re al RE: City of Renton -- Public Works touva Expansion of Public Works Facilities ECF-038-88 CU-038-88 Dear Mr. Kaufman: We represent Thomas McMahon, the owner of the property directly to the southwest of the property which is the subject of the abovereferenced proposal. Our review of the Building and Zoning Department' s file indicates that a mitigated Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) may have been issued on July 13, 1988 and published on July 18 , 1988 . If in fact the mitigated DNS was issued, our client did not receive notice of the DNS. Accordingly, we are requesting an extension of the deadline for filing an appeal of this mitigated DNS in the event it has been issued. Alternatively, in the event that the mitigated DNS was issued on July 13, 1988 , we wish to protect our client' s interests by notifying you that we wish to appeal the mitigated DNS . The grounds for this appeal include, without limitation, the lack of proper notice to our client of the mitigated DNS and the Building and Zoning Department' s determination that the proposal will not have a probable signficant adverse impact on traffic along the streets and highways serving the proposal site. An Environmental Impact Statement should be required to adequately discuss the adverse traffic and transportation effects on the proposal. • Mr. Fred Kaufman August 1, 1988 Page Two Because, after reviewing the Building and Zoning Department' s file, it is unclear whether or not the mitigated DNS was actually issued on July 13, 1988 , we have not enclosed a check to cover the filing fee. We, are prepared to do so in the event that the mitigated DNS has in fact been issued. Please advise accordingly. Very truly yours, Karen . Feyerherm KJF:klm cc: Renton Building and Zoning Department Mr., Thomas McMahon k'Ii" ,NOTICE QaR!`i ffbNMENTAL DETERMI • xt+ r f 4NATION Environmental Review Committee r 4Y,Renton,Washington • The Environmental Review Committee AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION ERC)has`ssued a Determination of Non Significance for;the following projects): Jody L:Thompson Rezone n f + . Audrey Benner Rezone 329 acres of property from R-2,; ,being first duly sworn on oath states Low Density Hesidentiel Use ,to R 3 Medi- that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the m Density Residential Use.Property)ocat•, d at 1222 &",1224 Kirkland'Avenue N.E. ECF-04 -88, 045-88 ' °"4 '^ '�,y. .i4. f�at�1e�.��Ylh�`os,. t7�ir�#�'����;; City 6f"Rnton, Public Works Depart- VALLEY DAILY NEWS ment,King CountyProperty Rezone • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition Application to rezone a 36 acre parcel of property fromG-1, General Use to P-1, ,Public Use. Subject property is a contigu- Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week.That said newspapers 'ous 36 acre site, including a parcel owned are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six by the City of Renton which is addressed months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published .on the 3500 block of N.E.2nd Street and a parcel owned by King County addressed at in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King Monroe Avenue N.E. ECF-03788, R-037=` County,Washington.The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for Further information regarding this action King County. is Available-In the Building and Zoning' Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. This Determination is FINAL. There is a 14 day appeal period The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the Kent Edition which will end at 5:00 p.m. on August 1, , , Renton Edition X , Auburn Edition , (and not in 1988. Any appeal of this decision may be supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers made to the City's Hearing Examiner and must state clearly, in writing, why the during the below stated period.The annexed notice a Determination should be revised and must Notice of Environmental Determination 'be' accompanied by,a non-refundable $75.00 filing fee. July 18 , 19 8 8 R5 0 81 'Published:July-18,,,1988 Valley Daily News was published on R5081 AccoUnt#51067 The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $ 2 6 .5 0 Subscribed and sworn to before me this 2 7 thday of July 19 N ry Public for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, King County, Washington. VDN#87 Revised 11/86 vak-.5w- • AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On, the itIAL day of ck.1,14 , 1988, I deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing emnronv.4.44 chalimAs o rd documents. This information was sent to: dc4ex-ft-watt6," NAME:t • REPRESENTING: • • t)e.-t. of s e ,e JJc . Rdels Gcyoad 1.4ko.rbcl - ZW\cl _ ay. Divtsiw.. GY 1\, ash M ro VLia -6 She NF Giby • SIGNED BY: Z. ' SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this 7 day of DUL`1 • , 1988. • 11' CBEF� F �, Notar Public in and fo the State of Washington, eo;z 0 • , residing at "--"cE d , therein. .o + o;zk :� •o 1� Pr to▪©� .zr Number: Joc,i L. "Thornpsan ( R.. 615 - 88 v 47. . • OF C;-}y • cf Penir,,P1lc Works (s- 031-8b P (eu.. 038-88, K Ccu apt �Ik, Wovks CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO.: ECF-037-88 APPLICATION NO(S): R-037-88 PROPONENT: City of Renton, Public Works Department LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Subject property is a contiguous 36 acre site, including a parcel owned by the City of Renton which is addressed on the 3500 block of N.E. 2nd Street and a parcel owned by King County addressed at Monroe Avenue N.E. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Building & Zoning Department The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of an expanded environmental checklist and preliminary site plan on file with the lead agency. There is no comment period for this DNS. Responsible Official; Environmental Review Committee Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator • Building & Zoning Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 APPEAL: You may appeal this determination in writing to Renton Hearing Examiner no later than August 1, 1988. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. PUBLICATION DATE: July 18, 1988 DATE OF DECISION: July 13, 1988 • SIGNAT T: ,1 nald G. Nelson Larry rii' g-r Building Manager Planni _ Divisio anag:1 ichard C. H ghton Public Works Director _ 7J 4$ 0. CITY OF RENTON "LL BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor - Ronald G. Nelson, Director July 15, 1988 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section Mail Stop PV-11 Olympia, WA 98504 Re: Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith are copies of Environmental Determinations issued on July 13, 1988: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE Jodi L. Thompson Rezone (ECF-045-88; R-.045-88) ✓City of Renton-Public Works, Rezone of Public Works Facilities (ECF-037-88; R-037-88) The Determinations are final and may be appealed to the City's Hearing Examiner no later than 5:00 p.m. on May 9, 1988. Any appeal must state clearly in writing why the Determination should be revised and must be accompanied by a non-refundable $75.00 filing fee. DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED King County-City of Renton, Expansion of Public Works Facilities (ECF-038-88; CU-038-88) The fifteen (15) day comment period for these projects will end on August 2, 1988. Following the end of the comment period, the City will finalize it's Determination unless comments received require a reevaluation. Following the finalization of the Determination, there is a required 14 day appeal period. If you have questions, please call Jeanette Samek-McKague or me at 235-2550. 411111— Donald K. Erickson, ICP Zoning Administrator pc: Mr. Gerald W. Marbett, King County Bldg. & Land Division Mr. Gregory M. Bush, Metro DKE:sr 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 • 4$ , CITY. OF RENTON "LL BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director • July 15, 1988 Joe Robels Department of Fisheries Habitat Management Division Room 115 Olympia, WA 98504 Re: Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith are copies of Environmental Determinations issued on July 13, 1988: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE Jodi L. Thompson Rezone (ECF-045-88; R-045-88) City of Renton-Public Works, Rezone of Public Works Facilities (ECF-037-88; R-037-88) The Determinations are final and may be appealed to the City's Hearing Examiner no later than 5:00 p.m. on August 1, 1988. Any appeal must state clearly in writing why the Determination should be revised and must be accompanied by a non-refundable $75.00 filing fee. DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED • King County-City of Renton, Expansion of Public Works Facilities (ECF-038-88; CU-038-88) • The fifteen (15) day comment period for these projects will end on August 2, 1988. Following the end of the comment period, the City will finalize its Determination unless comments received require a reevaluation. Following the finalization of the Determination, there is a required 14 day appeal period. If you have questions, please call Jeanette Samek-McKague or me at 235-2550. ,�Si rely Dona d K. Erick n, AICP Zoning Administrator • cc: Department of Wildlife 16018 Mill Creek Blvd Mill Creek, WA 98012 DKE:sr 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 4% CITY OF RENTON .AL BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director July 15, 1988 Richard C. Houghton, Director Public Works Department City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South • Renton, WA 98055 Re: . . Application to rezone an 36 acre parcel of property from G-1 (General Use) to P-1 (Public Use) to accommodate existing public works facilities and to enable future expansion of those facilities. (R-037-88) Dear Dick, This letter is to inform you that the Environmental Review Committee reconsidered their Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated issued for the above referenced project. The Committee at their meeting on July 13, 1988, issued a Determination of Non-Significance for the proposal since it is a non-project action and the previous conditions can be obtained through subsequent project actions anticipated on the site in the near future Because there were no mitigation conditions, this Determination is final and may be appealed to the City's Hearing Examiner no later.than 5:00 p.m. on August 1, 1988. Any appeal must state clearly in writing why the Determination should be revised and must be accompanied by a non-refundable $75.00 filing fee. If you have any questions, please call me or Jeanette Samek-McKague at 235-2550. Si , Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE:sr 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton. Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 'r i yrT`T,f` f des 1 '�49".tt,'„�'' 1 ENVIRONMENTAL , DEcLARATION . APPLICATION NO. ECF-037-88, R-037-88 APPLICANT City of Renton, Public Works Department, King County Property Rezone PROPOSED ACTION Application to rezone a 36 acre parcel of property is a contiguous 36 acre site, GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS A parcel owned by the City of Renton which is addressed on the 3500 block of N.E. 2nd Street and a parcel owned by King County address at Monroe Avenue N.E. POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (E.R.C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES >iZt DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL [WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY August 1, 1988 - AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION. NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION Environmental Review Committee Renton, Washington The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance for the following project(s) : Jody L. Thompson Rezone Rezone . 329 acres of property from R-2 , Low Density Residential Use, to R-3 Medium Density Residential Use. Property located at 1222 & 1224 Kirkland Avenue N.E. ECF-045-88 ; R-045-88 City of Renton, Public Works Department, King County Property Rezone Application to rezone a 36 acre parcel of property from G-1, General Use to P-1, Public Use. Subject property is a contiguous, 36 acre site, including a parcel owned by the City of Renton which is addressed on the 3500 block of N.E. 2nd Street and a parcel owned by - King County addressed at Monroe Avenue N.E. ECF-037-88; R-037-88 Further information regarding this action is available in the Building and Zoning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235- 2550. This Determination is FINAL. There is a 14 day appeal period which will end at 5:00 p.m. on August 1, 1988. Any appeal of this decision may be made to the City's Hearing Examiner and must state clearly, in writing, why the Determination should be revised and must be accompanied by a non-refundable $75. 00 filing fee. . Published: July 18, 1988 0 • King County Solid Waste Division Department of Public Works 450 King County Administration Building 500 Fourth Avenue Seattle,Washington 98104 D w 0- kA— July 11, 1988 ,?-,' Z Mr. Ronald G. Nelson, Director Building and Zoning Department City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 _ RE: Determination of Non Significance (mitigated) ; R-037-88 Dear Mr. Nelson: We have received a copy of the City of Renton Notice of Determination of Non-Significance (mitigated) for the project named Rezone of King County Public Works Facilities, application number R-037-88. We noted that one of the mitigation measures recommended was for the applicant to install ground water monitoring wells around the existing Renton Transfer Station. We request that you reconsider this recommendation for the reasons discussed below. R. W. Beck and Associates has sent to you for preliminary review a letter dated June 3, 1988 with plans showing two schematic design alternatives for our proposed Renton Transfer Station Sewer Improvement Project. The project generally includes the construction of an asphalt parking area for ten solid waste transfer trailers and miscellaneous improvements to the storm drainage system and the on-site sewerage system. These improvements include the construction of an extension to the City's sewerage system and abandonment of the existing on-site septic system. As part of the proposed improvements, stormwater runoff from areas affected by solid waste operations is proposed to be directed to the sanitary sewer system. The two alternate approaches prepared by R. W. Beck generally differ in the method and quantity of stormwater discharges to the sanitary sewer. In both cases, the objective is to minimize the quantity of stormwater discharged to the sewer system while maintaining an acceptable water quality in stormwater discharges to natural drainage courses. With the above proposed improvements and knowing that the transfer station is .� not situated on any old solid waste landfill , we see no extraordinary need for groundwater monitoring. In addition, we are not aware of any basis to identify the transfer station as presenting risks of contamination beyond Ethose �f., presented by similarity situated industrial or urban land uses. )We acreAa hling,N, to particiapte in appropriate comprehensive programs to monitor the quali=ty5ofil >°t nimic as • L,,, &'-/ 1-1 Li PT . Mr. Ronald G. Nelson July 11, 1988 Page Two Renton's ground water aquifer. However, we believe the installation of ground water monitoring wells around the station should not be required as an incidental part of this rezone application. Should you like to discuss this matter further, please contact James Chu at 296-4411 or Mike Giseburt of R. W. Beck and Associates at 441-4962. Thank you for your consideration of these comments. S' ere y� - i Roll y G. Hansen, Ph.D. , P.E. Manager RGH:JC:mw jc047 cc: Dennis Cearns, R.W. Beck and Associates Mike Giseburt, R.W. Beck and Associates Paul Tanaka, Acting Director, Department of Public Works 0. J. Saltarelli , Facilities Administrator Deborah P. Lambert, Engineering Services Manager, Solid Waste Division ATTN: Kevin Kiernan, Supervising Engineer James Chu, Senior Engineer CMETRo I, Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle Exchange Building • 821 Second Ave. • Seattle,WA 98104-1598 July 5, 1988 Environmental Review Committee Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator City of Renton Department of Building and Zoning 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 7 Determination Non-Si nificance File No. : E 037-88 C ty of Renton Dear Mr. Eri son: Metro staff has reviewed this proposal and anticipates no significant impacts to its wastewater facilities. Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment. Sincerely, Gregory M. Bush, Manager Environmental Planning Division GMB:wsg Public Notice NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL • AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION DETERMINATION Environmental Review Committee Renton,Washington The Environmental Review Committee Audrey a nne r ,being first duly sworn on oath states (ERC) has issued a DETERMINATION OF that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED for the following project(s) under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. The Appli- cant(s) have completed a mitigation pro- VALLEY DAILY NEWS cess pursuant to WAC 197-11-350. City of Renton, Public Works Depart- • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition ment, King County Property Rezone Appli- cation to rezone a 36 acre parcel of proper- Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week.That said newspapers ty from G-1, General Use to P-1, Public Use. Subject property is a contiguous 36 are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six acre site, including a parcel owned by the months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published City of Renton which is addressed on the in the English language continuallyas dailynewspapers in Kingown block King N.E.Countynd Street saed a parcelKent, owned by addressed at Mon- County,Washington.The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal roe Avenue N.E. R-037-88. newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for This decision will be finalized in 15 days. Written comments received after 5:00 p.m. King County. July 12, 1988, will not be considered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period will com- mence following the finalization of DNS. The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the Kent Edition The mitigation measures imposed by the Renton Edition X Auburn Edition City of Renton's Environmental Review (and not in Committee are available at the Building supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers and Zoning Department, Municipal Build- during the below stated period.The annexed notice a ing, Renton,Washington. Phone 235-2550. Published in the Valley Daily News June P ua 1 i c Notice 27, 1988.Acct.#51067.R3021 was published on Juae 27 , 1988 R302i The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $25 .00 :Z. 0‘.‘1". 1:0 Subscribed and sworn to before me this 'i t.1 day of .I ul y 194 Notary ublic for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, King County, Washington. VDN N87 Revised 11/86 • - 7. 04 J CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO.: ECF-037-88 APPLICATION NO(s).: R-037-88 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application to rezone a 36 acre parcel of property from G-1, General Use to P-1, Public Use. This is a non- project, programmatic rezone at the present time. Plans for future use of the site include: 1) the expansion of public works maintenance shops and addition of a Fire Department Training area for the City of Renton and King County; 2) King County District Court; 3) King County Transfer Station; 4) King County Health Department; 5) King County Parks Department. PROPONENT: City of Renton, Public Works Department LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Subject property is a contiguous 36 acre site, including a parcel owned by the City of Renton which is addressed on the 3500 block of N.E. 2nd Street and a • parcel owned by King County addressed at Monroe. Avenue N.E. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department. The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 42.32c.030(2) (C). This decision was made after review of an expanded environmental checklist and preliminary site plan, on file with the lead agency. Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-2822 (D) Renton Municipal Code (see attached sheet). These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340. The lead agency will not act on this proposal for fifteen (15) days from June 27, 1988. Any interested party may submit written comments which must be submitted by 5:00 p.m., July 12, 1988, in order to be considered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period will commence following the finalization of the DNS. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055 • Phone: 235-2550 DATE OF DECISION: June 24, 1988 PUBLICATION DATE: June 27, 1988 `/ Aiiittadmiewe onald G. Nelson arry . .ringer Building and Zoning Director Policy D: • opment D�N ctor Richard C. Ho}, ton Public Works );2kr ctor sigltr NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON ON AUGUST 9, 1988 , AT 9:00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: CITY OF RENTON PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT/KING COUNTY, FILE NO. R-037-88 • APPLICATION TO REZONE A 36 ACRE PARCEL OF PROPERTY FROM G-1, GENERAL USE, TO P-1, PUBLIC USE. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. IS A CONTIGUOUS 36 ACRE SITE, INCLUDING A PARCEL OWNED ! . BY THE CITY OF RENTON WHICH IS ADDRESSED ON THE.3500 BLOCK OF N.E. 2nd STREET AND A PARCEL WHICH IS ADDRESSED AT MONROE AVENUE N.E. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Building and Zoning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON AUGUST 9, 1988 , AT 9:00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. (_sPOSTEO": NW-) Ronald G. Nelson Building and Zoning Director CERTIFICATION I. OEKR1 T. HEREBY CERTIFY THAT _ , CuR (4 ) COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS WERE POSTED BY ME IN ( ,CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON OR NEARYBY THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and forthe State of Washington residing in L on - the /s>- day of -Wet 4 u.rr . /1 erf ci)ett4,14_,:o )/• (--dr2-44J SIGNED: �J11 .(AMA__ #214 j DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE MITIGATION MEASURES PROJECT: Rezone of Public Works Facilities , ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF-037-88 APPLICATION NUMBER: R-037-88 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application to rezone a 36 acre parcel of property from G-1, General Use to P-1, Public Use. This is a non-project, programmatic rezone at the present time. Plans for future use of the site include: 1) the expansion of public works maintenance shops and addition of a Fire Department Training area for the City of Renton and King County; 2) King County • District Court; 3) King County Transfer Station; 4) King County Health Department; 5) King County Parks Department. • LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Subject property is a contiguous 36 acre site, including a parcel owned by the City of Renton which is addressed on the 3500 block of N.E. 2nd Street and a parcel owned by King County addressed • at Monroe Avenue N.E. RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. That the applicant install ground water monitoring wells around the transfer station. • 2. That the applicant ensure that the steam cleaning facility be hooked up to the sanitary sewer system if the facility is not already on sanitary sewer. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEL AGENDA June 22, 1988 Third Floor Conference Room Commencing at 10:00 a.m. NEW PROJECTS City of Renton, Policy Development-Hazardous Substances Zone Designation Ordinance Development of a Hazardous Substance Zone Designations Ordinance for the purpose of implementing state mandated requirements to allow hazardous waste treatment and storage facilities in zones where the handling and processing of hazardous substances is not prohibited, except residential zones. ECF-046-88 City of Renton, Public Works Department, King County Property Rezone Application to rezone a 36 acre parcel of property from G-1, General Use to P-1, Public Use. This is a non-project, programmatic rezone at the present time. Plans for future use of the site include: 1) the expansion of public works maintenance shops and addition of a Fire Department Training area for the City of Renton and King County; 2) King County District Court; 3) King County Transfer Station; 4) King County Health Department; 5) King County Parks Department. Subject property is a contiguous 36 acre site, including a parcel owned by the City of Renton which is addressed on the 3500 block of N.E. 2nd Street and a parcel owned by King County addressed at Monroe Avenue N.E. R-037-88 DISCUSSION Econo Lube N'Tune ECF-028-88 Letter from Sherwin Lisker, RE: mitigation measures. Dalpay ECF-030-88; R-030-88 Letter from Roger Blaylock regarding proposed limitation of uses for rezone and request for reconsideration. TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE • AGENDA June 1, 1988•. Third Floor Conference Room Commencing at 10:00 a.m. TIME/KEY PARTICIPANTS NEW PROJECTS • Herbert Williams & Harry Dolleman A rezone application for 2.56 acres lying east of 3717 N.E. 6th Street and an adjacent 4.98 acres of land located at 3717 N.E. 6th St. from G-1, General Use to R-2, Low-Density Multi-Family Residential Use. This is a non-project rezone application. The property is presently developed with one single-family residence which is occupied, and with several accessory structures. Property located east of 3717 N.E. 6th Street. The property is south of N.E. 6th Street and west of Union Avenue. ECF-004-88; R-004- 88. City of Renton, Parks & Recreation-Panther Creek Weklands Mosquito Abatement. Application for environmental review to allow the abatement of mosquitos within the 65 acres of the Panther Creek Wetlands with a specific pesticide ("biologicals") Bacillus Thuringiensis by power spreader. Located east of SR-167 (Valley Freeway) and between I- 405 and S.W. 43rd Street within approximately 65 acres of the Panther Creek Wetlands. ECF 036-88. City of Renton, Department of Public Works-Maplewood Creek Restoration Project. Application for environmental review and Shoreline Master Permit to construct drainage improvements to an unnamed tributary, referred to as Maplewood Creek, situated in the Cedar River Basin. Maplewood Creek is located within the lower Cedar River • Basin and passes through the Maplewood Golf Course. The Golf Course is located at 4000 Maple Valley Highway. ECF-035-88; SM-035-88 DISCUSSION ONLY King County Public Works Facilities. An application for a Conditional Use Permit to improve Public Works Facilities by: 1) construction of new storage building; 2) expansion of existing building/services for crew use; and 3) construction of new materials testing laboratory. ECF-038-88; CU-038-88. City of Renton Public Works Department An application to rezone 18 acres of property from G-1, General X Use, to P-1 (Public Use) for the purpose of zoning the property to its actual use and to enable future necessary expansion of public service facilities at this location. At present 13 acres of land are developed; 5 acres are undeveloped. ECF-037-88; R-037-88) i c� 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET � Cl/gti. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: C i+i ll rttS �j -41. t, DATE CIRCULATED: 5/12 COMMENTS DUE: 5/26 �V'i� O EFC - 037 _ 88 yeti , O APPLICATION NO(S). : R 037-88 04 PROPONENT: City of Renton/King County Public Works je PROJECT TITLE: Rezone of Public Works/Services Property BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:Apolication to rezone. 18 acres (13 acres presently developed with City services & 5 acres being purchased for service facilities) from G-1 (General Use) to P-1 (f ubl i-c Use) fat the pur Huse of Lun i rLy the pr oiler Ly Lu its actual use and to enable future necessary expansion of public services facilities at this lnratinn_ LOCATION: At and in the vicinity of 3555 N.E. 2nd Street; adjacent to Monroe Avenue SITE AREA: 18 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: �F u,s01›.1 414 PI/ e °/ )) ' 7/// / We have r:viewed t ' pplication with particular attention to those areas we have expe tise i and e identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional infor t'o s needed to properly assess this proposal. /2ô / Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Form A r ' RENTON'BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 037- - 88 APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE : R-037-88 PROPONENT : CITY OF RENTON/KING COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. PROJECT TITLE : REZONE OF PUBLIC WORKS/SERVICES PROPERTY BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE' 18 ACRES (13 ACRES PRESENTLY DEVELOPED WITH CITY SERVICES & 5 ACRES BEING PURCHASED FOR SERVICE FACILITES) FROM G-1 (GENERAL USE) TO P-1 (PUBLIC USE) FOR THE PURPOSE OF ZONING THE PROPERTY TO ITS ACTUAL USE AND TO ENABLE FUTURE NECESSARY EXPANSION OF PUBLIC SERVICES LOCATION : FACILITES AT THIS LOCATIO LOCATED AT AND IN THE VICINITY OF 3555 N.E . 2nd ST: ADJACENT TO MONROE AVE . TO : PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : ENGINEERING DIVISION n TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 21.1.1TILITIES ENG , DIVISION El FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU n PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT n BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT n POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FlOTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BB 5: 00 P .M. ON MAY 26 , 1988 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : (Jt7IL1TV ID P7 n APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED TEE Exi s i sacs4-ci a tie 5" NP -NE '026 Pa `g), c/Ec uP1,,w-A z o F rtJE 19,zo6 A Q ya FCa- ' 26ZeCT/o , rim . towed. TIC finPoce D A PA O o,i./entc&- ,AA/° T'6 P2aPoSc,O 14AZ"-7,1-1- Zo1 0E51G/or?iotiS 7E}L-`5C C I/G-)eb16-4175 wo(4u-O No-r iQ-c.c,omlc50, . ►F 14(5 PnaP6fazi vit 6 to 00 26 Zol4C-0 ro P-I zocJiu& 705-a\ T C- eXiS7iMG r4crc.;776S ;fry voeu .F 4TL4 o Ftge-6 0tieNT -54Da-to A SL46,1 r To a a,„oj r av_s 1 7,06r 6vosT/Mcp uN��-620,46ho Tn/tcs 6G SC-L0A- .Z12'G/ C / T4,a6D (pia 779,ves') S i ,u a&- 2CGu- ' Scse67��1CG S„ ,426 u3E50 .4No7 5rZ2C? 2, �x(s?(N(� ,4i o.JE GRo c/J N Nnc;�G�tv��`�o fiat S00�oV� c S'C-G(5,,10�1LA-( Cor�r I ( No- Friu2C S12fl,26 - 1 N 3. ALL -0.c.� p2 wash Oo.✓nc /a26.6S sflouc.l) . cv�crir4�'3 A lO 561a4 ��l- IN/Tai.' St-u/61L 4, "TOG T?z J-SFi32 S7e!o°s4 Scfou(-O LC- Selo 2E0 50 {2uN=OFF G ou.- nloi O/,IUL Tv SoiLS Au- 01 ►2c.(uc.49(oAls ran— z G- Z OF- AP d2p/N 1CL Sl co_o 66- me1 [r ( . omroetaG k,✓5c�s 5iloL409 }3G trs-SiAcc.t-� r0/ ileVF/cA��^4 . �j lb?kr DATE: 5/4/08 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 „,., 1 R7 2149N,. 1 (T '4 �'9` `�` ��rti ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET `i , , REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 1re. ?re..%JeAkW\ ' ' q� J9 DATE CIRCULATED: /12 COMMENTS DUE: 5/26 ®.�� c99 EFC - 037 _ 88 tp`j 1 3 l�u� �FA APPLICATION NO(S). : R 037-88 ). • PROPONENT: City of Renton/Kin4 County Public Works r �` PROJECT TITLE: Rezone of Public Works/Services Property BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:Application to rezone 18 acres (13 acres presently developed with City services & 5 acres being purchased for service facilities) from G-1 (General Use) to P-1 ( le future necessary expansion of public services facilities at this lncatinn_ LOCATION: At and in the vicinity of 3555 N.E. 2nd StrUet; adjacent to Mnnrne Avenue SITE AREA: 18 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities A - COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. /4/ >X// ,6-0 ✓_3 /988 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Form d RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMeIT **.j. 0 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW S1E E % 4:4440 ÷ ECF - 037- - 88 ®4.e 0 APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE : R-037-88 PROPONENT: CITY OF RENTON/KING COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. PROJECT TITLE : REZONE OF PUBLIC WORKS/SERVICES PROPERTY BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE 18 ACRES (13 ACRES PRESENTLY DEVELOPED WITH CITY SERVICES & 5 ACRES BEING PURCHASED FOR SERVICE FACILITES) FROM G-1 (GENERAL USE) TO P-1 (PUBLIC USE) FOR THE PURPOSE OF ZONING THE PROPERTY TO ITS ACTUAL USE AND TO ENABLE FUTURE NECESSARY EXPANSION OF PUBLIC SERVICES LOCATION : FACILITES AT THIS LOCATIC LOCATED AT AND IN THE VICINITY OF 3555 N.E . 2nd ST: ADJACENT TO MONROE AVE . TO: 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : ENGINEERING DIVISION OTRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION TykFIRE PREVENTION BUREAU OPARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT OBUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT OPOLICE DEPARTMENT OPOLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OOTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT B3 5:00 P .M. ON MAY 26. 1988 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : fvie.. preVeACIAL APPROVED OAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED ,.d/Z .a, DATE : J 3 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET G4 V A /11, REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: TraiG DATE CIRCULATED: 5/12 COMMENTS DUE: 5/26 NI) '% _ 037 _ 88 �s� � EFC yy APPLICATION NO(S). : R 037-88 �44� PROPONENT: City of Renton/King County Public Works PROJECT TITLE: Rezone of Public Works/Services Property BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:Apolication o rezone 1S acres (13 acres rre�ently� developed with City services & 5 acres being purchased for service facilities) from G-1 -(General Use) to P-1 (Public Use) fur the purpose of curiiny Lhe property Lu its dctudl use and to enable future necessary expansion of public services facilities at this lnratinn_ LOCATION: At and in the vicinity of 3555 N.E. 2nd Street; adjacent to Monroe Avenue SITE AREA: 18 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 4`'- 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use f/ 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: i3 -5/ ,b--a, %tom' e74, � 1 - , --_ -4/6). / id s (7-- € 1,5 ��R., •ems l' f g-P Ll <nee.61. .o ram , ( v A, ,_crir Vfr IV) V) r-4) c®c.Jd J-� e, s o ` ` .1-0 NE 4--f?s A- We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. 9 7,..) p,o) ose Signature of Director or /Authorized Representative Date Form A , RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPAk r MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 037- - 88 APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE : R-037-88 PROPONENT: CITY OF RENTON/KING COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. PROJECT TITLE: REZONE OF PUBLIC WORKS/SERVICES PROPERTY BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION. TO REZONE 18 ACRES (13 ACRES. PRESENTLY DEVELOPED WITH CITY SERVICES & 5 ACRES BEING PURCHASED FOR SERVICE FACILITES) FROM G-1 (GENERAL USE) TO P-1 (PUBLIC USE) FOR THE PURPOSE OF ZONING THE PROPERTY TO ITS ACTUAL USE AND TO ENABLE FUTURE NECESSARY EXPANSION OF PUBLIC SERVICES LOCATION : FACILITES AT THIS LOCATIC LOCATED AT AND IN THE VICINITY OF 3555 N.E. 2nd .ST: ADJACENT TO MONROE AVE. TO: 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : Ei ENGINEERING DIVISION STRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT ❑ POLICE DEPARTMENT OPOLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT wB 5: 00 P .M. ON MAY 26 , 1988 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : El APPROVED 0 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS r ON T .APPROVED re- /ys EID it f4G; d s c'?,5' ,s5:6/e a P.0 6 egg- — j 0 F �. "' ��' `y7 ' \a,' -fir _ DATE: )' g SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHOR ZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 40 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ®� 1�� 'bO REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: C in Yr �� VDATE CIRCULATED: 5/12 COMMENTS DUE: 5/269j.ø 037 _ 88 .y�� EFC - . � APPLICATION NO(S). : R 037-88 0NIS PROPONENT: City of Renton/King County Public Works y° PROJECT TITLE: Rezone of Public Works/Services Property BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:Application to rezone 18 acres (13 acres presently developed with City services & 5 acres being purchased for service, facilities) from G-1 (General Use) to P-1 ( • enable future necessary expansion of public services facilities at this lnratinn_ LOCATION: At and in the vicinity of 3555 N.F. 2nd Street; adjacent to Mnnrne Avenue SITE AREA: 18 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water (./ 4) Plants 5) Animals `. 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: H ' , We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to//properly assess this proposal. Signature of Dir or or Authorised Representative Date Form d RENTOry`BUILDING & ZONING DEPAk rMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 037- - 88 APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE : R-037-88 PROPONENT: CITY OF *RENTON/KING COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. • PROJECT TITLE : REZONE OF PUBLIC WORKS/SERVICES PROPERTY BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE 18 ACRES (13 ACRES PRESENTLY DEVELOPED WITH CITY SERVICES & 5 ACRES BEING PURCHASED FOR SERVICE FACILITES) FROM G-1 (UNEELL USE) TO P-1 (PUBLIC USE) FOR THE. PURPOSE OF ZONING THE PROPERTY TO ITS ACTUAL USE AND TO ENABLE FUTURE NECESSARY EXPANSION OF PUBLIC SERVICES LOCATION : FACILITES AT THIS LOCATIC LOCATED AT AND IN THE VICINITY OF 3555 N.E . 2nd ST: ADJACENT TO MONROE AVE . TO: ❑ PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : ENGINEERING DIVISION 0 TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : • a UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU 0 PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT • BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT ▪ POLICE DEPARTMENT • POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BNB 5:00 P .M. ON MAY 26 . 1988 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : OAPPROVED El APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS SNOT APPROVED ,,9( VeTc-4)-fr 6"c-- 7 ;. Z ./c 3 5e" d i()�j (')/\..- � .^-.� = r / * ' U I:�► at, s s sue . •ic-s 1-4-e riLf. N‘- (-) At- DATE: _5-1/4)l e- SIGNATURE OF DIRECT R R AUTHORIZE REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 �_� ,o.) . . ,.. - r; CITY OF RENTON 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET RE ' FVE : REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: F11c-.6 Die,veicrimerr JUN � '� �988 DATE CIRCULATED: 5/12 COMMENTS DUE: 5/26 EFC - 037 _ 88 r-- lkDrT/50r? 11 DEPT. APPLICATION NO(S). : R 037-88'� PROPONENT: City of Ren`t�on/ Anti County Public Works ill 886t £ 1 OW 1 PROJECT TITLE: Rezone of Public Works/Services Property N011438 dO A110 '1`•wc.'_:! 1;':iVdd013/;3Q A0110d BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:Application to rezone 18 acres (13 acres presently developed with City services & 5 acres being purchased for service facilities) from G-1 (General Use) to P-1 ( le future necessary expansion of public services facilities at this 'oration_ LOCATION: At and in the vicinity of 3555 N.F. 2nd Street; acl.jarent to Mnnrne Avenue SITE AREA: 18 acres ' BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY y :%F.;•ram.: • 1) Earth w 2) Air :• 3) Water > "(, 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health ✓\ 8) Land and Shoreline Use i‹. 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation k 15) Public Services - 16) Utilities COMMENTS: re--it • i) fPrope,r is in zavve.2 of P1/4PA. /1 11 uses e eere eo 1-45 IvtcW £`4L-• ^'t • ,i0�^, "- cA-A--� p -Ay'°``t`'e-At /t-?-C .�'.'A-CL" *14a-')/ sty 'vim .64- - IA-i)(-*CI- -a" `Q APA 0.A.ott-A-L-cA--,. J} r tGt,..c. .ws-env . -•� • ,..,4_,,..) / A z�- --e-ek, _LL .�- `(- R- - „A.-4-4- , .4--,C'-- , i-S ro ,w"'-e-d. b ¢ .-a.o a- -Gem-<.- •-ram 0 ta..~1 u� A-A-1 .. 1 1` A.4-e -.t._ .11,e„, c,Ld Z h. `L,Crue -a�.. .4,L, y24,4.,,„,ev.2 L..� (2..L.0-Q-e-ett, 5 a.e.,e - -L- I /06 .-�--6 P-'- pl.ee.1...d.„.3.F_ c,ez,,,,,0 4-0,-, ..e C:� .' f-°�°.` .z-.k.ec &�-e,t-av-e... Cvuei�+ ar.,..,- ./+-e : c. . We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we c-e"—i` 1 have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where , ✓additional info mation is needed to properly assess this proposal. i'V A// f ,;1-:u 4) Q.i,(�/th-(/Lc�� 5--a s- R Signature/of Director or Authorized Representative Date —7) / ' a. z 1 L721L.4- -2" art -e-(-4-- LForm A -� a S . e r ~ RENTON"BUILDING & ZONING DEPAR1 ENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 037- - 88 APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE : R-037-88 PROPONENT : CITY OF RENTON/KING COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. PROJECT TITLE : REZONE OF PUBLIC WORKS/SERVICES PROPERTY BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE 18 ACRES (13 ACRES PRESENTLY DEVELOPED WITH CITY SERVICES & 5 ACRES BEING PURCHASED FOR SERVICE FACILITES) FROM GA. 1GENERAL USE) TO P-1 (PUBLIC USE) FOR THE PURPOSE OF ZONING THE PROPERTY TO ITS ACTUAL USE AND TO ENABLE FUTURE NECESSARY EXPANSION OF PUBLIC SERVICES LOCATION : FACILITES AT THIS LOCATIO LOCATED AT AND IN THE VICINITY OF 3555 N.E . 2nd ST : ADJACENT TO MONROE AVE. TO: 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 0 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : IIUTILITIES ENG . DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT El BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 0 POLICE DEPARTMENT SPOLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT B B 5: 00 P .M. ON MAY 26 , 1988 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : ?0t \, )e_\IPAoi (Y)e OAPPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS Ard NOT APPROVED /az. fi-ueL,4,-:,--gc, 614 I U _, 1'JS067- -iv ILL- , c , .��-e�2 , DATE: 5-- 2`� - e g SIGNATURE F 'SIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 ,, — ,o n 4i 0 CITY OF RENTON isIL POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor MEMORANDUM DATE: May 31, 1988 TO: Environmental Review Committee FROM: Policy Development Department SUBJECT: Reznn`nd CU for City and County Shops R-037-8803.8-88 This department is sensitive to the needs of the City and County for expanded Public Works shop facilities and the lengthy negotiations which have gone into this application. However, recent policy decisions which have been made or are being made in this City should be carefully evaluated under SEPA both to ensure environmental compatibility and consistency in the application of policies and standards. This proposed Rezone and Conditional Use is located in the Aquifer Protection Area in the vicinity of the three fill pits which have recently been permitted. At the time of these Fill Permit applications, extensive information about the Aquifer was required as part of SEPA review. Strict conditions were imposed upon pit operations based upon a finding of potential impacts to groundwater. These conditions included ensuring that materials deposited were not hazardous in nature, ensuring that accessory uses such as vehicle maintenance and re-fueling were not permitted, and requiring groundwater monitoring wells for early detection of possible problems. The fill pits themselves are not inherently a hazardous substance land use. The proposed project for City and County shops is a Hazardous Substance Land Use facility as defined in the proposed Hazardous Waste Zoning Designations. In fact, in terms of hazardous substance use, the County and City shops are among the top 5 percent of users and generators in this City. A list of the substances and quantities currently permitted at these sites according to Fire Department records is attached. The specific uses of concern at these shops include: paint shops, solid waste transfer facility, vehicle maintenance facility, gasoline pumps, a proposed materials testing laboratory, hazardous and regulated substance storage, use, handling and waste generation, and a vehicle steam cleaning facility. Under the proposed Hazardous Zone Designations, this land use would be prohibited at this location. The prohibition would be based on a change to the draft ordinance as requested by Public Works. (See attached letter and draft) 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2552 Rezone & CU for City & County Shops May 31, 1988 Page 2 Under the draft Aquifer Protection Ordinance (5-4-88), the proposed uses are identified as "of concern" (Section 5 (B) 1), and could be prohibited on a case-by-case basis. See attached section. At the very least such land uses would be subject to very strict regulations under a Well Field Operating Permit. To ensure that the City is not subject to charges of arbitrary and capricious decision- making, I would strongly suggest that this Rezone and Conditional Use application be subject to the same rigorous review as any private application. I would also suggest that if any discretionary actions are approved that the findings of fact clearly reflect the rationale for the approval in light of adopted policy for the Aquifer as reflected in the Secondary Containment Ordinance, current SEPA policies based upon the Fill Permit applications, and proposed policies on hazardous substances and aquifer protection. The SEPA application should be expanded with an analysis of land use impacts of permitting the identified uses including the proposed expansions, the groundwater impacts of the uses, evaluation of any current groundwater problems, evaluation of the safety of current hazardous materials use on site, evaluation of policy questions as identified in this memo, exploration of the impacts of the solid waste transfer station which is not presently sewered, impacts of the development on sub-regional drainage, and transportation impacts and mitigation fees. The conditions which could be attached to any approvals include: 1. Secondary containment including retrofitting as necessary of all underground and above ground storage tanks; 2. Secondary containment of all buildings and outdoor areas in which hazardous materials are used, stored, handled, or in which wastes are generated; 3. Ground water monitoring; 4. Prohibition on vehicle maintenance and re-fueling in all newly developed areas and a prohibition on the expansions of such activities in existing use areas; 5. Prohibition of the expansion of any hazardous substance use on site; 6. Bonding as necessary for clean-up of spills; 7. On-site drainage detention for the 100-year storm event as agreed to by Public Works and WSDOT as part of the I-405 understanding; 8. Transportation mitigation consistent with the pending CH2M Hill report for the corridor; 9. Installation of sewers; 10. Collection of all stormwater runoff and leachate from the King County Transfer Station facility to be directed into the sanitary sewer. q'11MAT CITY OF RENTON . 05/12 /88 HIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAZARDOUS MATERIAL LIST PAGE 141 May 1988 Station g 12 Business Name : . CITY . OF` RENTON"' SHOP'S ' Business # 1178 Address : 3555 NE' 2ND ST PERMITS FCL C /W S/D R/G LPG PRODUCT QNTY SIZE FORM STORAGE ACETYLENE 2 TANK COMPRESSED GAS CHAINED OXYGEN 2 TANK COMPRESSED GAS CHAINED UNLEADED GAS 1 10,000 GAL TANK LIQUID UNDERGROUND DIESEL 1 10,000 GAL TANK LIQUID UNDERGROUND WASTE OIL 1 500 GAL TANK LIQUID UNDERGROUND • PROPANE 1 2200 GAL TANK LIQUID ABOVE GROUND SOLVENT 1 15 GAL DRUM LIQUID DRUM, TANK LUBRICATING OIL 12 55 GAL BARREL LIQUID BARREL H.'AZP•1AT CITY OF RENTON • 05/12 /83 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAZARDOUS MATERIAL LIST PAGE 170 May 19 ;335 Station # 12 Business Name : KING COUNTY" ROAD7DEPARTMENT Business # 1032 Address : 155 MONROE AV NE PERMITS C/W LPG FCL S/D PRODUCT QNTY SIZE FORM STORAGE UNLEADED FUEL 1 10,000 GAL TANK LIQUID UNC/GRND #F PROPANE 1 500 GAL TANK GAS OUTSIDE PROPANE 1 100 GAL TANK GAS OUTSIDE THINNER 56 1 GAL CANS LIQUID -CABINET "H" THINNER 2 55 GAL DRUM LIQUID BLDG "H" SOLVENT 3 55 GAL DRUM LIQUID BLDG "H" KEROSENE 3 55 GAL DRUM LIQUID BLDG "H" ACETYLENE 12 103CF CYLINDER GAS CHAINED OXYGEN 16 122CF CYLINDER GAS CHAINED GASOLINE, REG 1 20,000 TANK LIQUID 1978 UNDERGROUND G.ASOLINE , DIESEL 1 20,000 TANK LIQUID 1978 UNDERGROUND OIL, WASTE 1 6,000 TANK LIQUID 1978 UNDERGROUND •v. Q y % tt CITY OF RENTON "LL �k ` PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Richard C. Houghton, Director May 23, 1988 TO: Nancy Laswell Morris, Policy Development FROM: Ron Olsen, Utilities Engineer SUBJECT: Hazardous Waste Zoning Nancy: Your draft looks good but I believe the whole APA (acquifer protection area) should be covered, not just Zone 1. The use of that much regulated substance if there were a spill would be hazardous to the acquifer. This usage would be a greater hazard than the fill sites presently in Zone 2 about which there already is great concern. It should also be noted that approximately 95% of the APA is residential area. Also, control of the entire area of the APA would be similar to that which is proposed in the acquifer protection ordinance. If you have questions, please call. RLO; R91)7 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2569 Revision No. 10 LL A / C-�ovt� • May 2, 1988 with joints and gaskets conforming to American Water Works Association Standard Specifications C151 and C111 . 9 . Closure requirements shall apply to those facili- ties that cease to store, handle, transport, treat, use, or produce regulated substances for a period of more than 365 days or when the owner has no intent within the next year to store, handle, transport, treat, use, or produce regulated sub- stances. During the period of time between cessa- tion of regulated substance storage, handling, transport, treatment, use, or production, and actual completion of facility closure, the ap- plicable containment and monitoring requirements of this Ordinance shall continue to apply. Prior to closure, the facility owner shall submit to the Department a proposal describing how the owner intends to comply with closure requirements. Owners proposing to close a facility shall comply with the following requirements: a. All regulated substances shall be removed from the facility, including residual liquids, solids, or sludges. b. When a containment device is to be disposed of, the owner must document to the Department that proper disposal has been completed. c. An owner of a containment device or any part of a containment device that is destined for reuse as scrap material shall identify this reuse to the Department. The owner of a facility being closed shall demon- strate to the satisfaction of the Department that no unauthorized release has occurred. This demon- stration can be based on the ongoing leak detection monitoring, groundwater monitoring, or soils sampling performed during or immediately after closure activities. B. Zone 2 of an APA. 1. Within Zone 2 of an APA, changes in land use or construction of new facilities that could lead to degradation of groundwater quality may be pro- hibited. Changes in land use or construction of new facilities will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis at the time that a building permit; condi- tional use permit; mining, excavation, fill grading permit; shoreline development permit; site plan se5861/069/13 13 Revision No. 1 , 'May 2, 1988 a'Lai' review, variance, rezone, planned unit development, subdivision, short subdivision, or land use permit application is filed with the City of Renton. The focus of the review will be on activities to be conducted; regulated substances that will be stored, handled, transported, treated, used, or produced; and the potential for these activities or regulated substances to degrade groundwater quality. Those land uses of concern include sur- face impoundments; waste piles; hazardous waste ' treatment, and storage and disposal facilities; hazardous waste landfills; solid waste landfills and transfer stations; surface impoundments; waste piles; septic systems; petroleum product pipelines; • chemical manufacturing facilities; computer parts manufacturing facilities; lumber mills; asphalt plants; wood-treating facilities; and service stations. 2. The storage, handling, transport, treat, use, or production of regulated substances at existing facilities shall be allowed within Zone 2 of an APA upon compliance with the provisions in this subsection and those in Subsection 5A (5) of this Ordinance. 3. Within one (1) year of the effective date of this Ordinance all owners of existing facilities who store, handle, transport, treat, use, or produce regulated substances shall obtain a Well Field Protection Operating Permit from the Department. Owners of new facilities shall apply for a Well Field Protection Operating Permit in conjunction with and at the same time that they apply for site plan review, conditional use permit, or a business license, whichever process occurs first. A permit is required for each facility. All Well Field Protection Operating Permits shall be renewed an- nually thereafter. The permit shall contain all items required by Subsection 5A (3) except for Item b, a list of chemicals to be monitored. 4. The Department may require new and existing facil- ities or changes in land use in Zone 2 whose po- tential to degrade groundwater quality equals or exceeds that of permitted facilities in Zone 1 to comply with the provisions of Subsections 5A(5) and 5A (6) . The Department will make its deter- mination based on the activities conducted at the facility; regulated substances stored, handled, transported, treated, used or produced; and the potential for the activities or regulated sub- stances to degrade groundwater quality. se5861/069/14 14 r.14 +, Revision No. 10 May 2, 1988 ry C. Conditions for Residential Development 1 . Within Zone 1 and Zone 2 of an APA, new residen- tial development shall, as a condition of approval, s' be required to connect to a central sewer system prior to. occupancy. 2 . Within Zone 1 of an APA, the use of heating oil is prohibited in any new residential development. D. Conditions for Fill Sites 1 . All filling activities within Zone 1 or Zone 2 of an APA shall comply with the provisions of the Washington State Minimum Functional Standards for Solid Waste Handling (173-303 WAC) and the King County Board of Health Rules and Regulations No. 8 , Minimum Functional Standards for Solid Waste Handling. Prior to initiat- ing any filling activity, the property owner must submit a report to the Department describing how fill materials will be tested to demonstrate that leaching of these materials will not degrade groundwater quality. During the filling activity the property owner must keep a log identifying the source (s) of all fill materials and where they are placed in the fill. A copy of the log must be submitted to the Department every 6 months until the filling activity is completed. Within 5 days of completing the filling activity a copy of the entire log must be submitted to the Department. SECTION 6 . EXEMPTIONS. A. Ememptien-fer-eentineeue-transit--The-traxspertatea-ef any-reguiated-slabstanee-threagh-Bane-i-of-en-APA-shall be-ellewed-provided-the-transgerting-vehlele- s-ia eentntleus-transit. A. Exemption for use of certain regulated substances--The use of certain regulated substances such as pesticides, herbicides, and fungicides in recreational, agricul- tural, pest control, and aquatic weed control activi- ties shall be allowed provided that in all APAs: 1 . The use is in strict conformity with the use re- quirements as set forth by the EPA and as indicated on the containers in which the substances are sold. 2 . The user applies for a Well Field Operating Permit. B. Exemption for the Use of Nitrates Contained in Fertil- izers--The use of fertilizers containing nitrates shall be allowed in Zone 1 and Zone 2 of an APA provided that: se5861/069/15 15 7 J IJs rv-1.6-W..J -33 (B) 4. Prohibited Uses (e) Off-site Hazardous Waste Treatment and Storage facilities. SECTION 7: Renton City Code (Building Regulations) Title IV, Chapter 7, Section 4-730, Manufacturing Park District (MP) is amended as follows: (B) 2. Accessory Uses: (j) For permittedrises, hazardous substance land uses, including on-site hazardous w to treatment and/or storage facilities, which di net. accumulate are than 20,000 pounds of hazardous substances or wastes or C/ any combination thereof at any one time on site, subiect to the provisions of Section 4-738, except off-site hazardous waste treatment and/or storage facilities. • (B) 3. Conditional Uses (g) For permitted uses, accessory hazardous substance land uses which accumulate more than 20,000 pounds of hazardous substances or wastes or any combination thereof at any one time on site, subiect to the provisions of Section 4-748. (h) Off-site hazardous waste treatment and/or storage facilities, subiect to the provisions of Section 4-748. SECTION 8: Renton City Code (Building Regulations) Title IV, Chapter 7, Section 4-738, Site Plan Review is amended as follows: (B) Applicability (1) For all development in the Manufacturing Park (MP), Office Park (O-P), Public Use (P-1), and Business (B-1) zones, the R-1, R-2, R-3, R-4 Residential zones, all development with the Valley Planning Area, within the Aquifer Protection Area, and for all hazardous substance land uses. (D) Site Plan Review Criteria (5) Aquifer Protection Area (APA) (a) In Zone I of the APA no use, storage, handling, manufacture, production, or other activity involving hazardous substances is permitted except for the use of individually packaged household consumer products in Quantities of less than five (5) gallons and hazardous substances used for the protection of the domestic water supply. (b) No hazardous substance land use facilities shall be located in the APA. 4:110% VREVI2149N EN VIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ( 440070 pNlice, EWING DEPARTMENT: �k4 ���' 5/12 COMMENTS DUE: 5/26 'kn ©, DATE CIRCULATED: T� EFC - 037 _ 88 lb,+4119 APPLICATION NO(S). :_ R 037-88 1F4 PROPONENT: City of Renton/King County Public Works v,®lL PROJECT TITLE: Rezone of Public Works/Services Property 1 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:Apolication to rezone 18 acres (13 acres presently developed with City services& 5 acres being purchased for service facilities) from G-1 (General Use) to P-1 (Public dse) for the pu► pOSe of cuniny the pruperLy Lu its actual use and to enable future necessary expansion of public services facilities at this lnratinn LOCATION: At and in the vicinity of 3555 N.F. 2nd Street; adjacent to Monroe Avenue SITE AREA: 18 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: FT‘ie--e-s. AIC- We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional i formation is eeded to properly assess this proposal. f/Z y /4e, Signature of Director or Allearg4presentative Date Form d • RENTC:_ BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 037- - 88 APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE : R-037-88 PROPONENT: CITY OF RENTON/KING COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. PROJECT TITLE : REZONE OF PUBLIC WORKS/SERVICES PROPERTY BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE 18 ACRES (13 ACRES PRESENTLY DEVELOPED WITH CITY SERVICES & 5 ACRES BEING PURCHASED FOR SERVICE FACILITES) FROM G-1 (GENERAL USE) TO P-1 (PUBLIC USE) FOR THE PURPOSE OF ZONING THE PROPERTY TO ITS ACTUAL USE AND TO ENABLE FUTURE NECESSARY EXPANSION OF PUBLIC SERVICES LOCATION : FACILITES AT THIS LOCATIC LOCATED AT AND IN THE VICINITY OF 3555 N.E . 2nd ST: ADJACENT TO MONROE AVE. TO: 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 1=1 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU • PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT 0 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RPOLICE DEPARTMENT ▪ POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO 'THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BNB 5: 00 P .M. ON MAY 26 , 1988 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : • APPROVED 0 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 0 NOT APPROVED • DATE: SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Frsrm l El2 11. 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET /i40 Es, REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ?CA12 1 COMMENTS DUE: 26 �� " �'DATE CIRCULATED. � �5 f EFC - 037 _ 88. `0' 0 dP 3/4 APPLICATION NO(S).: R 037-88 G PROPONENT: City of Renton/Kin! County Public Works Itok PROJECT TITLE: Rezone of Public Works/Services Property BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:Application to rezone 18 acres (13 acres presently developed with City services & 5 acres being purchased for service facilities) from G-1 (General Use) to P-1 ( le future necessary expansion of public services facilities at this lnratinn_ LOCATION: At and in the vicinity of 3555 N.F. 2nd Street; adjarent to Mnnrne Avenue SITE AREA: 18 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air • 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: /Vo ,Cr '//c' /- G6 e'e ��f IA 2•e. Gahure re(dre 7L1oe.- do ada6-/fit°' < O�r'1�"Qoram- Au GC f��le C- ( /*leo, We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. 26, likr Signatu of Director or Authorized Representative Date Form 4 - RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPAR T MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 037- - 88 APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE : R-037-88 PROPONENT: CITY OF 'RENTON/KING COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. PROJECT TITLE : REZONE OF PUBLIC WORKS/SERVICES PROPERTY BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE 18 ACRES (13 ACRES PRESENTLY DEVELOPED WITH CITY SERVICES & 5 ACRES BEING PURCHASED FOR SERVICE FACILITES) FROM G-1 (GENERAL USE) TO P-1 (PUBLIC USE) FOR THE PURPOSE OF ZONING THE PROPERTY TO ITS ACTUAL USE AND TO ENABLE FUTURE NECESSARY EXPANSION OF PUBLIC SERVICES LOCATION : FACILITES AT THIS LOCATIC LOCATED AT AND IN THE VICINITY OF 3555 N.E . 2nd ST: ADJACENT TO MONROE AVE. TO : 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : OENGINEERING DIVISION DTRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : OUTILITIES ENG . DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT OPOLICE DEPARTMENT OPOLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DOTHERS : . COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE. PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BNB 5:00 P.M. ON MAY 26 . 1988 . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVI'SION : . AI44. Y /reCk-ao `lM. ERIAPPROVED OAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED ,i- Ala or /2•WI i4/UA- 7%' / ( he , 04f?•4 st iC ,ea o,, ,pe tome-/eZof leifrren 7'li "10/7:L" x -z'LL e / 'd'' ,iii/ e igef t / iA.- /71/c.✓ 7 fff6ff Meir— G deft v.c gr, 4 /0G0.,/- e ,lo/g e ./ eveolf, DATE : //1� �6j/e�1� SIGNATUR DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE (y REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: pktiOltDATE CIRCULATED: 12 COMMENTS DUE: 5/26 EFC - 037 _ 88 APPLICATION NO(S). : R 037-88 PROPONENT: City of Renton/King County Public Works PROJECT TITLE: Rezone of Public Works/Services Property BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:Apolication to rezone 18 acres (13 acres presently developed with City services & 5 acres being purchased for service facilities) from G-1 (General Use) to P=1 (Pubiiz. Use) fin the pu► puae Ur Luniny Lhe properLy Lu : iLs dcLudl use dnd to endble future necessary expansion of public services facilities at this lncatinn_ LOCATION: At and in the vicinity of 3555 N.F. 2nd Street; adjacent to Monroe Avenue SITE AREA: 18 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Si na .uie of Director or Authorized Representative Date Fnrm A RENT(,.. BUILDING & ZONING DEPA__ .. ENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 037- - 88 APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE : R-037-88 PROPONENT: CITY OF RENTON/KING COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. PROJECT TITLE: REZONE OF PUBLIC WORKS/SERVICES PROPERTY BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE 18 ACRES (13 ACRES PRESENTLY DEVELOPED WITH CITY SERVICES & 5 ACRES BEING PURCHASED FOR SERVICE FACILITES) FROM G-1 (GENERAL USE) TO P-1 (PUBLIC USE) FOR THE PURPOSE OF ZONING THE PROPERTY TO ITS ACTUAL USE AND TO ENABLE FUTURE NECESSARY EXPANSION OF PUBLIC SERVICES LOCATION : FACILITES AT THIS LOCATIC LOCATED AT AND IN THE VICINITY OF 3555 N.E . 2nd ST: ADJACENT TO MONROE AVE . TO: 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 0 ENGINEERING DIVISION ▪ TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : • UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU 0 PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT 0..BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT El OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BM35: 00 P .M. ON MAY 26 , 1988 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : B L1] 1:1 APPROVED Er APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 0 NOT APPROVED ,V00 6 Cal 1.1r17inf G c id�C/� \� Q-✓GAF- _ ' �4� DATE : l� ® SIGNATUR F DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 1 R 9 � Y. Q� 'ITY OF RENTCNT FILE NO(S): r -58 ` A. ` Ei ..�LDING & ZONING DEPARTI.�.. T - - - `- .0 sgops Opy/thif,+ leeZt , ECC--03-7-:.4-. • MASTER APPLICATION _ NOTE TO APPLICANT: Since this is a comprehensive application form, only those • items related to your specific type of application(s) are to be completed. (Please print or type. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) APPLICANT I . ITYPE OF APPLICATION NAME FEES . City of Renton ADDRESS tED REZONE*(FROM 0-1 TO P-1 ) 200 Mill Avenue South 0 0 SPECIAL PERMIT* CD TEMPORARY PERMIT* . CITY ZIP Renton WA 98055 �1 1 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT* • TELEPHONE • L.J SITE PLAN APPROVAL 0 SPECIAL PERMIT FOR GRADE AND FILL ' 235-2569 No. of Cubic Yards: / ' CONTACT PERSON 0 . VARIANCE* . From Section: NAME * Justification Required Richard C. Houghton • ADDRESS ' SUBDIVISIONS: Same as Above 0 SHORT PLAT CITY ' ZIP 0 TENTATIVE PLAT 0 PRELIMINARY PLAT - . TELEPHONE 0 FINAL PLAT 0 WAIVER (Justification Required) OWNER NO. OF LOTS: NAME PLAT NAME: City of Renton ADDRESS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: Same as Above 0 PRELIMINARY CITY ZIP 0 FINAL TELEPHONE P.U.D. NAME: 0 Residential 0 Industrial 0PARKS:Commercial 0 Mixed LOCATION MOBILE HOME PROPERTY ADDRESS 3555 N.E. 2nd Street D TENTATIVE EXISTING UUSEIC Works PRESENT ZONING 0 PRELIMINARY I' FINAL Maintenance Shops G-1 -.,:. PROPOSED USE PARK NAME: Public Works Maintenance Shops .& Fire .Dept. Training, for NUMBER OF SPACES: King Co. & City of Renton/ , District Court Transfer Station and 0 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE ealth Department. _ SQ. FT. ACRES AREA: 36 Acres TOTAL FEES . CITY OF RENTON STAFF USE ONLY -- ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING DAT ecEIVED APPLICATION RECEIVED BY: MAY 0 n 1988 APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: ',-> 0 Accepted BUILDING/ZONING DEFT.) 0 Incomplete Notification Sent On By: (Initials) DATE ROUTED ADDITIONAL MATERIAL RECEIVED BY: .- 1 - Y APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: S 1 0 Accepted 0 Incomplete Notification Sent On By: (Initials) ROUTED TO: (56 Building Design Eng. 4,Fire Parks Police 4==� Policy Dev. { 0 Traffic Eng. Utilities -'r REVISED 1=31-84 • Le.,2A-ti 4 ascription of property (if more space is required, attach a separate sheet). SEE ATTACHED • AFFIDAVIT cp 6ERT Et e 5 -"CO D , being duly sworn, declare that I am ,authorized representative to act for the property owner,Downer of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge • and belief. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS - G rh- DAY OF � Y , 19 Pr. NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, RESIDING AT _____ ga.r2,6e.z,Ld �OL - Robert E. Bergstom (Name of Notary Public) (Signature of Owner) City of Renton o y& 200 Mill Avenue South (Address) (Address) Renton WA 980.55 (City) (State)" (Zip) (206) 235-2631 (Telephone) Acceptance of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete application. Plans and other materials required to constitute a complete application are listed in the "Application Procedure." Form #174 ruu i i c wurics ria i n Lenance wnop_ City of Renton' of >, ECF: I 03()- 88 4: © z City of. Renton `U' IR- 37-8a 9 • 0 Q ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 1Te0 SE PI Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43,21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for allproposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does - _ not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impacts. Use of Checklist for Nonproject Proposals: (Please Type or Print Legibly) Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), , the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: City/County Shops Site and King Co. Governmental Center Rezone 2. Name of applicant: City of Renton - Lead Agency Jointly with King County 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact.person: 200 Mill Avenue South Richard C. Houghton Renton WA 98055 . 235-2569 • 4. Date checklist prepared: 3/25/88 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton, Building & Zoning/Policy Development 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): As Soon As Possible . CITY OF RENTON 1,• CEIV ED VW( 0 91988 7. Do you have any plans future additions, ,expansions, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? if yes, explain. YES Fire training site and open storage for Renton Public Works; King County Public Works is proposing yard improvements, new material testing labs and expanded lockers/showers for women employee's, and warehouse remodel . 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. NO 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. King County Public Works is corrently applying for a Conditional Use. Permit for their Public Works yard expansion, new material testing labs, warehouse remodel and expanded lockers/showers. 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. NO 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. The ;City owns 13 acres at present which is developed as our City Shop Facility. An additional 5 acres is being pur- chased. It is to be used to extend the Public Works Shop Facility and provide space for a Fire Training site. ,These are all Public uses. The property is presently zoned G-1 and each action requires use permits which are different from zoning. This proposed action will. zone the pro- perty to its actual use. The proposed rezone includes all parcels in Public Ownership: King Co. PW Shops; Solid Waste Transfer Station; King Co Dist. Ct. ; King Co. Parks; King Co. Health Dept. ; and City Shops site. The rezone includes the 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand vacant King the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and Co. properties section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of to the South. area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topography map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. City Shops King Co. Shops 3505 N.E. 2nd St. Monroe Ave. N.E. Renton WA 98056 King Co. District Court See Attached Map King Co. Solid Waste Legal Description King Co.. Parks Dept. King Co. Health Dept. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH • a. General description of the site (circle one); flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 20% on the Southern hillsides - 2 to 5% on upper developed sites c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, caly, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Sand, gravel d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? .If so, describe. No, however, the gravel and sandy soils can be subject to erosion if the ground cover is stripped off and not protected. • _ - 2 - e. Describe the_.�),Irpose, type, and approximate qLr_. ities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. NONE J r l f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. NO g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? NONE - zoning only At present, about 25% of the rezone area is developed. • h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: N/A 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. N/A b. Are there any off-site sources of emission? NO c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: NONE - The present City and County Shops have air pollution control devices on the carpentry shop areas to control saw dust. 3. WATER a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No permanent stream lies within the rezone area. The proposed area is all within the Cedar River Drainage Basin, draining either directly to the South, or westerly via the N/NE 3rd St. corridor. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. NO 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. N/A - 3 - . 4) Will the p .,;.rJSal require surface water withdx an,als or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximately quantities if known. NO 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. NO 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. NO b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and appaoximately quantities if known. NO 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals . . .; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. NONE c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. NONE - zoning only 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. NO - zoning only - 4 - d. Proposed mi___res to reduce or control surface, „Fund, and runoff water impacts, if any: • N/A The existing site drainage systems for both Renton and King Co. use on-site infiltration systems. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: o deciduous tree: alder, maple,.aspen, other o evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other o Shrubs o grass o crop or grain o Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other o water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other o other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? NONE - this is a rezone action only c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. NONE • d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: N/A zoning only The existing public improvements all have landscaped areas as a part of the various governmental uses. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: aw l limn eagle. ongbirds, other Mamma s: deer, bear, elk, ea , other rodents Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. NO c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. NO - 5 - d. Proposed measures to preserve:or enhance wildlife, ir'any: NONE - zoning only • 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. NONE - zoning only b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. NO - zoning only c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: NONE - zoning only 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. NONE - zoning only 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. NONE - zoning only • 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: NONE - zoning only b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? This action is zoning only. - 6 - 2) What types,, .J levals of noise would be created �F or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. • NONE - zoning only 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: NONE - zoning only B. Land and Shoreline Use a. (What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? , Existing on-site uses are: City and County Shops; King Co. District Court; King Co. Solid Waste; King Co. Parks Dept. ; and King Co. Health Dept. Adjacent uses are: Leasure Estates Trailer Park, Greenwood Cemetary, Maplewood Single Family neighborhood, and McMahon/Segalie Gravel Pits. • b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. NO c. Describe any structures on the site. The various existing Public Facilities are shown on the attached maps and photos. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? NONE e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? G-1 f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Public/Quasi-Public, Greenbelt g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No, however, the steep slope areas on the south of the King Co. properties are included in the rezone and often considered sensitive areas. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? NONE - zoning only, however, over 200 people work or report out of this City/county public governmental center. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? NONE k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: NONE - 7 - 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: We are requesting this zoning so the actual and proposed uses are compatable with the City land use plans and policies. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. NONE b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. NONE c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: N/A 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. N/A b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? NONE c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: NONE 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? NONE. The project has existing yard lighting for night and emergency work by public works crews. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? N/A • c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? N/A d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: NONE - 8 - 12. Recreation J a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? NONE The existing City and County Shops areas have open space and picnic areas for employee breaks and outside lunches. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. NO c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: N/A 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. NO - The site was used during WWII as a tank testing area for Pacific Car and Foundary. The upper plateau area of the complex has been disturbed and dug up for 40 years. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, . scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. N/A c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: N/A 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Monroe Ave. N.E. - 4 Lanes - curb, gutter,utilities, street lights, paved. N.E. 2nd St. - 36' wide, curb, gutter, utilities, sidewalks, paved. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximately distance to the nearest transit stop? YES. N.E. 4th & Monroe Ave. N.E. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have?' How many would the project eliminate? NO - zoning only d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). NO - zoning only - 9 - • e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. • NO • f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. NONE - zoning only g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: NONE • 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for • example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. NO - zoning only b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. NONE 16. Utilities a, • Circle u int' rrentl vailabl at_the ite: - - _ natural gas, . • cater use service, elephone, sanitary se = septic sys em ether. All public services are available to the site. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. NONE - zoning only • C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: Name Printed: Robert E. Bergstrom, P.E. Engineering Supervisor • City of Renton - Lead Agency- . - 10 - ii7f 11—R—Ad • D. SUPPLEMENTAL S!- r FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (This sheet should only be used for actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs. Do not use this sheet for project actions.) • Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous sutstances; or production of noise? NONE - No new improvements are proposed in this rezone proposal . Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: N/A 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? No impact Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: No impact 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? NONE. - No new improvements are proposed in this rezone proposal . Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: NONE • 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? No development is proposed at this time for the steep slope areas execpt for the construction of a future Monroe Ave. N.E. roadway extension to Maple Valley. • Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: Any road work proposed in the steep slope area will be separately addressed in separate SEPA review. • - 11 - 5. How would the propusai be likely to affect land and sinoraline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? No Shoreline impacts. The City/County properties are proposed to have future expansion and new facilities. Not all the potential developments have been designed. Considerable portions of the site are held in reserve 11gcrpositclVeaCAMmdgard or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: The King County properties are covered by a Master Plan which is attached. 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? The City and County Shops Complex is a public service complex. These facilities are the primary service centers for many critical public services such as: water,. sewer, storm drainage, flood control , street and road maintenance and solid waste. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. • SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. ?1 Proponent: , Name Printed: Robert E. Bergstrom, P.E. Engineering Supervisor City of Renton - Lead Agency - 12 - All • . c • ) U 'fi._ ,)e# 4.(L) •• .• • .,. U if il 0 ) 0 0 • 0 r-.- ..._.) 0 ® o r4 o o 041" -ii/z" 0 . , .... : N • N '••• 0 •/i (• •• (!)r- C? .,..,. .' . . ., .......;." '' or 0 , ........... ...) 0 ; it . . . , , . IA , . . : 0 0 . , 0 ... . . „' - 01 . S \ \ ,., .• N 0 0 N ' ...„•••• ,, ,•,. • .... --. ,.., . .„ - Y (----\. • ill , •,/,' • 0 0 ,"Ok -) •:" ai , -// g_,b,/-666r . , •••• ... w" 1,4,„___,,1 /co., •-: - -,.-: - 0 voi. •6,,, to 1 0--.---0.0. I sile kl---21--/ ---° it ••_. Q0i ..11/1 k k )0-- -0 '101 01.-4:2-41CRll .. / „., _&fi 0 .. ..... / d I 0 Ow-7°. ti bt) ,_ 0 — ,.....:.. I T z.,.---r7,7--- ...ji ...,..,, .(1.) vi -9 ki ... ...- 05- 4:4 0- %1 :. Z-6°-21 0-d-if ' 0 1 a // dal 'f_04&3-4° I 0 0- S3 CO I 0 • 0 N 0 ..:o 0 c1_ •. . •' ii-'----' \ _l. if a _e_——.0 0 0 „AD caLeg- e° o 0 0.co c 0 1/4C6'• 4,0 ...ow •--41:1/4. • • .. 6\P . •••• -a . )0 )3 4°1 0 k k Q 0 . • t i t 1 .. k • 0, cP„- lir • . .. 80 /o# ... •• 0 •' 090,500 g .._.., . ,a . 0..4,,.,/.._ . N A....) !ii;.•...!.''''''''''ak,„, 0 0 10. • r--) \.._../ (-- ._../ 0 0°4 --„.....,. 0 0 o(--) 0 1` co II (_ --1 • 5 1° 0 ,--N \rl '' U . 4.k. : ,....,,...,. , , 6 .. .... ,..... .,„ .. .. , ro • 4 . •-•••.. ,,,,,,, CO • V{ ,,,, . , ,, U(-• 0 , .-,7 rr \ •,..;...., ,.,.,. . . •*,,,,,, 0 co 1.4 ••. 0 .•• '''...%:,. , .). ...... • •,,,,,• • 0 • w .., • ( --.-„... . ,•..)... , .•..... „.••„, „•••- , k\s ,••<-, ..,.„,/.,7. .,.:,-•:. •-..,... , .4.., '`, .• -- -' '.* ..`. n . •Y.:::.,:,'1..4!:g.'.'..4:,:;',',*.,...,:=;02.,.s. • ..,..„ - ,„„ ..„, ,, .. . ...,..„...... ..,,,,„,:,...„,..„ ..:.: SHEET 6,z,/ e7 45 ills".'•••• AZE1 ,560' 6 • , 4 (6 r�1 err _ ,i _ 2" CLOSED a — — SEE,OET. /4 .5NT. 39 , o ` �O G(o Q` n� § 8 . m/ 1 ,� /fir I 95 Q gil �/ 6 --,c , ®_ T . .;. , i ®.@® , iz, . . ri t O Sri ® N �� ® � 5/ _ �y�r 4 1 1 • 6 b+ a/ DTI H O O • '3 /2 r ' 0/2- /�t Q a erl = e"e 8a os:OGrr • B / 42 • d o � ® a_ Qarl ® ,r o ® ay B 31 ® 9.. 1� ® Ba �f I zj ti B,r • 8" / rr rfr ._aem wexA�.egy.a».em..wu .. vi • . , ,y, y, �/ a---___, \ V ? '��` f • %,,..\\, -'\--. .,,,,:z.;,?..,,,..--..l."'"'•%N„.._''''-', '".... t/(",, C)/ 4'',--...; g l) \ ;. ® y . . • ��\� �� �� • E LWEET 23 SHEET 18 REI//5Ea .5//, 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: DATE CIRCULATED: 5/12 COMMENTS DUE: 5/26 EFC - 037 _ 88 APPLICATION NO(S). : R 037-88 PROPONENT: City of Renton/King County Public ,Works • PROJECT TITLE: Rezone of Public Works/Services Property BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:Application to rezone 18 acres (13 acres presently developed with City services & 5 acres being purchased for service facilities) from G-1 (General Use) to P-1 ( le future necessary expansion of public services facilities at this location_ LOCATION: At and in the vicinity of 3555 N.F. 2nd Street; adjacent to hMnnrne Avenue SITE AREA: 18 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants • 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services__ 16) Utilities COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Form 4 RENTC, .BUILDING & ZONING DEPAL-_ _,_MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW. SHEET ECF - 037- :- 88 APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE : R-037-88 PROPONENT: CITY OF 'RENTON/KING COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. PROJECT TITLE : REZONE OF PUBLIC WORKS/SERVICES PROPERTY BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE 18 ACRES (13 ACRES PRESENTLY DEVELOPED WITH CITY SERVICES & 5 ACRES BEING PURCHASED. FOR SERVICE FACILITES) FROM G-1 (GENERAL USES TO P-1 (PUBLIC USE) FOR THE PURPOSE OF ZONING THE PROPERn TO ITS ACTUAL USE AND TO ENABLE FUTURE NECESSARY EXPANSION OF PUBLIC SERVICES LOCATION : FACILITES AT THIS LOCATIC LOCATED AT AND IN THE VICINITY OF 3555 N.E . 2nd ST : ADJACENT TO MONROE AVE . TO : PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT . SCHEDULED ERC DATE : OENGINEERING DIVISION OTRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION OFIRE PREVENTION BUREAU OPARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT OBUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT ❑ POLICE DEPARTMENT OPOLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT B)B 5: 00 P.M.. ON MAY 26 , 1988 . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : . OAPPROVED OAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED DATE: SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 �.,.,.... 1 Q / Public works Maintenance Snop City of Renton OF R4, A, ECF: I 0. n- 6b t% z City of Renton n '`r� O w p° tr ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 0,91 eo SEP*1 'e Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43,21 C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for allproposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. • Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impacts. Use of Checklist for Nonproject Proposals: (Please Type or Print Legibly) Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D).. For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: City/County Shops Site and King Co. Governmental Center Rezone 2. Name of applicant: City of Renton - Lead Agency Jointly with King County 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact.person: 200 Mill Avenue South Richard C. Houghton Renton WA 98055 . 235-2569 • 4. Date checklist prepared: 3/25/88 • 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton, Building & Zoning/Policy Development 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): As Soon As Possible CITY OF R@TON '11:!•• ECE1 V tis MAY 0 9 19g8 .-w 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, ,expansions, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? if yes, explain. YES Fire training site and open storage for Renton Public Works; King County Public Works is proposing yard improvements, new material testing labs and expanded lockers/showers for women employee's, and warehouse remodel. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. NO 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. King County Public Works is corrently applying for a Conditional Use Permit for their Public Works yard expansion, new material testing labs, warehouse remodel and expanded lockers/showers. 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. NO 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. The City owns 13 acres at present which is developed as our City Shop Facility. An additional 5 acres is being pur- chased. It is to be used to extend the Public Works Shop Facility and provide space for a Fire Training site. These are all Public uses. The property is presently zoned G-1 and each action requires use permits which are different from zoning. This proposed action will zone the pro- perty to its actual. .use. The proposed rezone includes all parcels in Public Ownership: King Co. PW Shops; Solid Waste Transfer Station; King Co Dist. Ct. ; King Co. Parks; King Co. Health Dept. ; and City Shops site. The rezone includes the 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand vacant King the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and Co. propertie section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of to the South. area, provide the range or boundaries' of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topography map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. City Shops King Co. Shops 3505 N.E. 2nd St. Monroe Ave. N.E. Renton WA 98056 King Co. District Court See Attached Map King Co. Solid Waste Legal Description King Co. Parks Dept. King Co. Health Dept. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one); flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 20% on the Southern hillsides - 2 to 5% on upper developed sites c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, caly, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Sand, gravel d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No, however, the gravel and sandy soils can be subject to erosion if the ground cover is stripped off and not protected. - 2 - e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. NONE f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. NO g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? NONE - zoning only At present, about 25% of the rezone area is developed. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: N/A 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. N/A b. Are there any off-site sources of emission? NO c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: NONE - The present City and County Shops have air pollution control devices on the carpentry shop areas to control saw dust. 3. WATER a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No permanent stream lies within the rezone area. The proposed area is all within the Cedar River Drainage Basin, draining either directly to the South, or westerly via the N/NE 3rd St. corridor. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. NO 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. N/A - 3 - M1 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximately quantities if known. NO 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. NO 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. NO b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and appaoximately quantities if known. NO 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from . septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals . . .; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. NONE c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. NONE - zoning only 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. NO - zoning only - 4 - d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: N/A The existing site drainage systems for both Renton and King Co. use on-site infiltration systems. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: o deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other o evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other o Shrubs o grass o crop or grain o Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other o water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other o other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? NONE - this is a rezone action only c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. NONE d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: N/A zoning only The existing public improvements all have landscaped areas as a part of the various governmental uses. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: stun eagle ongbirds, other Mamma s: deer, bear, elk, other rodents Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. NO c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. NO - 5 - d. Proposed measures to preserve, or enhance wildlife, if any: NONE - zoning only 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. NONE zoning only b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. NO - zoning only c. What kinds of energy conservation features are;included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: NONE :- zoning only 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. NONE - zoning only 1) ' Describe special emergency services that might be required. NONE - zoning only 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: NONE - zoning only b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? This action is zoning only. - 6 - 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by-ur associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. NONE - zoning only 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: NONE - zoning only 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Existing on-site uses are: City and County Shops; King Co. District Court; King Co. Solid Waste; King Co. Parks Dept. ; and King Co. Health Dept. Adjacent uses are: Leasure Estates Trailer Park, Greenwood Cemetary, Maplewood Single Family neighborhood, and McMahon/Segalie Gravel Pits. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. NO c. Describe any structures on the site. The various existing Public Facilities are shown on the attached maps and photos. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? NONE e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? G-1 f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Public/Quasi-Public, Greenbelt g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No, however, the steep slope areas on the south of the King Co. properties are included in the rezone and often considered sensitive areas. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? NONE - zoning only, however, over 200 people work or report out of this City/county public governmental center. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? NONE k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: NONE - 7 - 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: We are requesting this zoning so the actual and proposed uses are compatable with the City' land use plans and policies. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. NONE b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. NONE- c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: N/A 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. N/A b. What views in the immediate,vicinity would be altered or obstructed? NONE c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: NONE 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? NONE. The project has existing yard lighting for night and emergency work by public works crews. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? N/A c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? N/A d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: NONE - 8 - 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? NONE The existing City and County Shops areas have open space and picnic areas for employee breaks and outside lunches. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. NO c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: N/A 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. NO - The site was used during WWII as a tank testing area for Pacific Car and Foundary. The upper plateau area of the complex has been disturbed and dug up for 40 years. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, . scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. N/A c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: N/A 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Monroe Ave. N.E. - 4 Lanes - curb, gutter,utilities, street lights, paved. N.E. 2nd St. - 36' wide, curb, gutter, utilities, sidewalks, paved. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximately distance to the nearest transit stop? YES. N.E. 4th & Monroe Ave. N.E. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? NO - zoning only d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). NO - zoning only - 9 - • e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. NO f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. NONE - zoning only g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: NONE 1.5. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. NO - zoning only b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. NONE 16. Utilities a. Circle ut' . '- rrentl availabl- I- ite: _ - - .__ natural gas, - ater,refuse services elephone,CEMM, septic sys em ether. All public services are available to the site. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. NONE. - zoning only C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. . Proponent: Name Printed: Robert E. Bergstrom, P.E. Engineering Supervisor City of Renton - Lead Agency - 10 - D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHtt i' FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (This sheet should only be used for actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs. Do not use this sheet for project actions.) Because these questions are very general. it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal. or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. i. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous sutstances; or production of noise? NONE - No new improvements are proposed in this rezone proposal . Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: N/A 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish. or marine life? No impact Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: No impact 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? NONE - No new improvements are proposed in this rezone proposal . Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: NONE 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? No development is proposed at this time for the steep slope areas execpt for the construction of a future Monroe Ave. N.E. roadway extension to Maple Valley. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: Any road work proposed in the steep slope area will be separately addressed in separate SEPA review. - 11 - • 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? No Shoreline impacts. The City/County properties are proposed to have future expansion and new facilities. Not all the potential developments have been designed. Considerable portions of the site are held in reserve l crpOislaimeeadMs omggid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: The King County properties are covered by a Master Plan which is attached. 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? The City and County Shops Complex is a public service complex. These facilities are the primary service centers for many critical public services such as: water, sewer, storm drainage, flood control , street and road maintenance and solid waste. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. > / Proponent: .rC�2 —/ Name Printed: Robert E. Bergstrom, P.E. Engineering Supervisor City of Renton - Lead Agency - 12 - iejALC —Cgr D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (This sheet should only be used for actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs. Do not use this sheet for project actions.) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. • When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at.a,greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous sutstances; or production of noise? 1v•1ct s E eDF .S t4 1•1'►,12-`1 5 EWE2 440 S'ib R.M SE'Wee- DIScH.c� ' a p , As e-E1-0rVED Tel) A -Es i o EZNIT1-04.L. f t2.d 1 Er.T- o tJ 1--'{ nk�2 vet L I�C-��c� .tT t��►.-`( �i "�� Trz+��tc. P is%to14 S W ILA dV-C'Ll ,. t.� f RaUc tcn or.) bP USE 1-6 x I c- MST L'Z-I L . Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: N aN QU 14eEb, 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or,�marine life?' • E x i s r(►�M 1 3 vi L�- em l�l►J , Fi nl is f 4-t L►,_�`► S cJ CAE rrAveo wrl--E ►J°NE royeelgri IS NaT pz 01Lc) I IT i' EKc-Lr°T -claps occlrs1ON fas614&E c SoN(4 (at)<S, . • Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: • 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? (jJ'u. USE El\lett.,N n►.cb N>? uvt P bu'zz.E otJLsy h t caM1,10.) To 06-\I pM l- OF i4 tees I bct.ITI ate- t° A Ezr, Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: kibt4E v.Etzu 1 e€X 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? W�}u L-10 ►Jc U E XFF"zT" Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: 1J irE IeEoSlvlleer:=N, - 11 - o, 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? g ZLIr•nE (2EST24 c11 S - ppPi...1 cm&l..L pfAuESTw Z 4"4" IS CcMepTr-I gL'E W l il'r Etc usEs.. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: Nam. Q.E- U I c2 En, E .coon . C.Q''1 fot-`f („j 1 '1,21 STIv4r)ea2ra.i' 5U04- f , -sEssAcK-S/ L b.cJ Sc-P►PI t.R.1 S c 12t:L tSi iJ' ,1 erc.,' 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? (Id&u L iniciecitr5g DErslwo5 or) 772A-AJstb2T?.rioN. , Pcia.(A .. Sci&Ic5i, MC UTI L.I rl Es, f}S Jt .M Ic. . 'fit) A-N! S/M/Liam tee-S 1 71°rc- reo • Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: • IUO/Jts- Ul2Ec f�LL uT/L►r/E,5 / E /rl �L14cLr� E77 fQ - orJ �°- pdbe r Ta 77 s '/ AM O Fr)LL %Pee 74T1dNJ4 L . oNi: �ocK 1b Trfc E T' 7-I+E f' o e T`t /s s J� Y t�� ss;. See 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. 140. • SIGNATURE • • I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is. true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: To t7/ G. Tf•70,9Plat) Name Printed: 8 y L,4W,2.evice M- CA749P,5E- j ,-1/1 CFait T7tt P/4.9Po4,DnrT� - 12 - D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (This sheet should only be used for actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs. Do not use this sheet for project actions.) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. • When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal; or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a,greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous sutstances; or production of noise? 1 -ENE Srt< IT►,12.1/4-1 P4•10 5rrotais4 5E lvJeg- . DI Sc.H ta•a. a N►-�1 , As f-E tD To A ?-Es I b f O 4 i t r a -'t nb2.IM A.L.- 1(2 (t .„41_ IhU.-`? 6.7Ew\524'*T j12 PF=IG et"1155toP4S VJIl.l� Qz;, 1oROckx_ tor) usF c>F AxI - Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: Jar QJ I UElo. 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, o marine life?... ExIsrIjt-t yas I1� gem*IQ , FI1iIst+-ep L sc I i r,Jtr,c__ I� wr E pk7 co (91+ ki a►'1E r�a„� tz�, IS Na ),1 � (=d t.�I c tit 1 I T i , E 1(c�io T . Tt•� �0 o N I�c. OCES E 4 cE oI= SoNcs,(3 . Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: • 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? t.-t. USE Et\ -c,,`i h Pc burar-ES osJL1 At coMmet) c i O Mel'- of 10. 2Es i o fl n�` ,�►z���-r, Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: l•(e)t.'E eEZu 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? I,,fOut-d ►Jc USE FE t Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: N dt.rE - 11 - 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including . • whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? `• ,%J (1ESTIZt cc-1 cpPL.1 Wit I , Rf AUESTW ZcN4114 LI 1S Ppr16cE W 71.1r USE-5, Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: N&k. RFGGU I c2.Eb/ EX c PF CO M(0t4 c.J t T`1=4 -edli 114•21 •Sucy- pis , 5ES�3F�ciLS LA-h1 ScPtt-nn, ScIeact•iiir,1 'rc.,' 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? • ("I6Li DL.FMp,-rtrl oil 772A4 nwri0PJ1 Aigc4C. S ✓I«, A4C) Uri LAriEs, PrS /J M►a-c_ ii-NY g26- t c,j/r7 L. • Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: kaltr AV_ UT(Li r/3 , E l rl f LI°.c6, E7774• • orl 01° 6 a coc J g•fr• re) P / s Y MLA �3us NS J/c S t� 71 E'cr T1+E P� 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. II O. SIGNATURE . I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: :To pI G. 7-1,0/1P50rt) Name Printed: ay GA-W,2-ewcE CA-K, 3E-6(- A-14 . - 12 - D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (This sheet should only be used for actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs. Do not use this sheet for project actions.) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal; or.the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at,a,greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. • 1. How would the proposal be likely to Increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous sutstances; or production of noise? Nc.(2.01rs E &iF St'l 17*,2`I 5 Ev l P 40 5TO RIt SE - . Ds Sc.1-4.42 6vEt o N L`l , As e_E1- To A ¢es►e EoJ'n PR-0 Esc-7. o ►kx241 E?�"Q•0,1-iO 12.EPi lk"11ZSf014S IA ILL CC,l.Ie... t� 1°pz O 4cn old bk- Li S E` T-x I c- 1 P L , Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: NottE ic-EQUigE», • 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, o marine life? EX►srI v fJILL. Rem►41r.1 Ff1Jisµ-tes unsc4*4'I�.1�-, p1U f'0 t4t4 E ►J ate* r.1 a„J ism, P1c.operliN EKc or fas E D 1= se*y(3 1 rz 5. . Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: KleAlz ar.0 IQ CD 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? W 1 l-l. U S E ET\I yN isrte. ?qv-N.14 .f_ bu12c.E , O tJ I.4 A t caMM on) T-a c)6..\1 6").-a?M \4‘.11-- 6? rt51. Pe I oE-►.m ar` yolasaFe-r. • Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? 1,J c.)u L-10 ►J c;; u S E d`P- FEL-1-7 Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: - 11 '- 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? `• PEST12I cTlonl S IS fl'PPL1 ci L E PeAUEETEn Zr-3 i►r4 c1 I S C_cIs1 PPT 16 c-E W Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: NBtJE R�GiuIr2EU/ EKdeer To cem t4tf-4 ►at S77,rtoP cts 5uc44- prs -Sty 6Hc.ILS L11i-I Scb►PI / scI2.e t'Il Nrci E'T=,.' 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? - lNc2C E D>_ PsrrO5 614 772g14�1R:f2-7-a.riON] PUBLIC. see✓ica, MD UT/L.I TI Esc Pre› 1 s 1 M/Liam 12E-SiceNtr7 prt_ Pa fizsr, Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: IUdlJcj /26 flu U77 Li riE3 Alec /r/ pLP,c.61 E777fE 2 a!J ol? f J Ta s Ts; A� F�u.Y 6/192 ►-noN'4�.. : oN6 ec,oc,. T Trf�c cEt ersr TrF£ PRaP6'T`9 IS s J� 13Y M &; s Jl 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. . N o.. . , SIGNATURE • I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: :To p G. T77'4MP10t1 Name Printed: 8 y L,4-cll,2PvcE M, CA-/VP4C j A-IA • • - 12 - D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (This sheet should only be used for actions involving decisions on policies; plans and programs. Do not use this sheet for project actions.) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or-the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at,a-greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous sutstances; or production of noise? I►�GREN.EE 5nN iT►+t2`i s p.43 nro R_m SE - . DgScH#.2.y ' d N►-,4 As e_E L- r E0 To A ?-Es I b EN1'n-0+L. ¢s2d ExT- is u( I�R iM c e.srr NiU-ti? 02 p, 12 -FF c. l �M Is s t o rJ S W i L-4.. acc,u e-. lowoucnoi r use' xfc.- Mpr- rac..% Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: NON 61uI4eE17, 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, o marine life?' EXIsrc yYt 01..4_ R&-iihsiJ Firlis14-ep uv S cssrina , L.JIi-( - In etpioeo wt+e a€ ►J d►4E rSa„) r OrPer2SN Is tAdr ps do LoLV 1410,144.�T�4i', E Kcefer F . 1-1Afi occVrsIoNmL etas 614 cE sc,t4 I ros, . Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? �J'u. USE EN S( nr•to N>+ ✓L PP--spuv2.c s ct.) P T caMMorJ �-d o&J 6-1-O?M&4•, OF 14- Pei o T i Pgit'aEe-r. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: NEE Fe u t►eec 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? 6.0 ►is i- USE dYz F"L"' Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: N o*tE le_E-MuI i2ecx. - 11 - 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including , whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? (2EST121 c.ric41 S pr t.l cog&LI R+izuUES1 W 7 11rtq Is c.omro '-i -E WIr} EK1ST1P-4C+, USE-S . Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: Nb g.F U I ft c , E .crEer It c.QM PL( tnl i S? (D qs pis SESSF'jc.►t-S I L.IdiJ DSc-AA Nal, S c le i+J'�1 E-'1 •' 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Wain INc2cbsE p(FM Ov.ttG5 orJ 772A4SrtneTin01.1 Ala c_ S c/ica, MO UT)L I T1 Es, Arc' aM l -L. ?'C1 P t ' Si M I Loa . lees 1 ceNt r7 ego J Mr. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: IUOIic A4tii RED AU- UT/Li rIE5 ,4 /r✓ f' c£'l EiTN£72- otJ ol° Jr - �„ T't 5 , A Fc1 U &Pcep-m f4L oN6 aC.oc . rti 171c Emir- Tlf£ p2oe r`/ /s se2J� 13Y M bus ScS�J� 7.... Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. • N o. . , r . SIGNATURE • I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: :TO p/ G. Tff'fPSort) Name Printed: 8 y LA-W gewce M. CA-'JP E-L- A-IA IreT M# 77t P/1.07"vwT� - 12 - D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS . (This sheet should only be used for actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs. Do not use this sheet for project actions.) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. • When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal; or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at greater greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous sutstances; or production of noise? Nc.(201rse &iF St,rt 1'7K21/4-1 5 ENNI FAO 5fTti RM SE*1JE2.• . Dl SCN 2 L a r4►--( , As f-Ei—M To P g-Es 0 ETJT-1-0*%... ftLO i Er-r. a L-� ►,kxtvti►e t_ �C--�►w .tn�a��-�( 67i "a-K i rz.+.wF►c, A eti5rdrJs tAl dcc,ue.. Q O12,60acrt J ram- List' c`fF 1`6 K 1 c_ M4,-rez4�c�S Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: NONE it-EQUII . 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life?... £X►Sn 'art 63 Ali'-►- (�elvi►ttl FiPJ►sk4-tp LibItINDsc ►r.R-, U tt r e-• erploeo t.-J -ca€ ►J dNEt1a„� Iz � roperey is Na.r .. 1,oI ►Ti'r, Kc_LY T F - Tiips occ lots toN PaSet cE SoNy(3 I WD(s. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: KI4ipts recZU 1 te. • Eb , 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? • b.) L-L USE EN t nNt•c) 1Jn ijt't4 c.. P bUI2.c.Ez OtJLY ht CaMMdd TO c &J E O?Met.1-- OF 1- ,fie I 06-t.rr A E r. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: N 6 e utrat 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? �..1 ou`O ►J c'i LL E XFFELT;' Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: rJatfE ieElall,1l2ec==,• • - 1 1 - no 4 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? S QL{r./J PEST12 I c flc p S. 14 e\-- fy.(›Q civaLts , R€ Uesrso ? �rt" Is cc3•1 eP r'I B t-E W ► y1-} Ex I S TD4' , u S�S, Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: P.FGW I c2 E01 ES(c icbr COM PLY . tn/1 -eat i f i ST,st(D+oCzt� 5t/cf!- f - sHc.ILs, Liac.IosG�►�-,, ScI2. tr,1 ,,' ' 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? • W&u(-IC) iNcierfer5g D WC5 onJ, I q a c scievt«� fa+10 ur L I t-I R-S f}rly S/M/L.I3 . /2ES I peNtr7 1°y-t... Pao J Ez-T: Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: 100MM6- oc2Mcil READ f3-� UTl Li r1E5 �2 - l PLpyc� �777f 01. 1 J Tb s / T��£' ,ono Fv w 1' o/' ATI() IA . oNL Bct�c� r 'Pic Elmer tf T £ PR Pert iS s�2J� !3y NE1 s3us S JIc�S 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. W O. • SIGNATURE • I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: :To pi L. 77/4 4PSo'J Name Printed: f3 y LAW, xJcE //9. CA07,4E-G j 7 T M,c TZI-C" P/to'Pen p vT) - 12 - D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (This sheet should only be used for actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs. Do not use this sheet for project actions.) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. I. How would the proposal be likely to Increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous sutstances; or production of noise? 1v,1cR sE & S!'.N vrk..zy SEv\le2 P.1(3 'nem ?IA 5E KsJJB&.• . DISCH,42.L t. d N u� , AS f_E I To Ps g-Es i 0 f tLd 4 E - d 0 1>i ►�jR fM la L 12C- tc� •ntat • �'T4-‘1-1 112-+WF1c F ►SsIo►J S W I LL, dcc,u . fpopucr iot,) t U cr ,-x I c May at LA%• Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: JoN L-E CPU U . 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, o marine Ex►Sr►+� i�'2 4iL 12em►wt . FIP4i -I s -ep LrtscJ►t'R-, L.J►t-� 13E etP1e0 &-Jtl-� PJ NN f a� �''�Is� P 1s NaT- I1V€ I tTW , EKcaoT (=�R Tt's occ.yrs1oN eas*t4cE F se*c.(1IAs) • • Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: Ne,tIEclU I k Eb • 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? UJ'w UsE ET &( ( Mo l.Mrt►vze R�buft,c E,s otJ(...Y At coN1 Td c)eJ16 -aPMet.;— OF A- pe i 0E-•.rr i PCB P►aSS EZ.r. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: t 1 Ut46 eEmAlit►2EC� 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? L-C) ► c U E — 1FCcT: " Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: r1 drr 1e€ l e€, - 11 - 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, . including whether it would allow or encourage, land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? . , +• S 0.{ ReST i c flc *1 s p,.9f L.►ci Pg34UirSTED Z.c* rJ cI S c M PpT-I g c-E Usi 'Sly S K IS Ti 1-1Cs, USES.. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: Nam. (2-cIU I col ex coPr lc c-t pLy l n-4 /rat S'11644,0 AC2.ns 'SUc SES�Ac.l�-S LA4,1DSCapI s cgetrri�� . �7E.•' . 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? . N L-4CD A/c/261,6,5E D Ers10514 orl 7I2A-44Ab -T?.no.J, Ai&C ►C_ See✓lCa 14o u•rr c,i ri s, PrS �zyM�-c.. A-14y s i M i c_W i2ES/CENT7 P3- . Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: IUDtits" REr) • A-c-L u77 Li n Alec l►J fobc61 7 N£'2 f9dJr e �, T s -� , ° Fc�u. ( df m-rnd J4�. : oN6 acoc, . Tro Tic Ersr Tt f Pe T-/ /.s s e2J� B Y M� S�✓/ 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. . No.. . SIGNATURE . I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: J o p/ OMPSok) Name Printed: 8 y 674 w Z n/cE M• CA P,B j f1-1,�( C/1--gear 7reT Foot T7 P/1-opa.�iv7� - 12 - _ t D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (This sheet should only be used for actions involving decisions on policies; plans and programs. Do not use this sheet for project actions.) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal; or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a.greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous sutstances; or production of noise? Nc(2Ehsr✓ &F srlo 1-c-kr4-1 say.1e62 ADO 5'i`tQM SE•-1i Q. . DIScH+4 -c� a 1.1 L� As e_ELK rso To A R-es e EIT 'n.,,vt.- f es5 es t-`i nkY21/1 A-L his '�2+w i c.. A.►4,0 A IS S r Lk) Ra puce blZ- CSC c7F X.I c- t-IA-rez-"L . Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: NONE KEQUIgErs. 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, o marine life?•••• EXtsrc►�-� . �Yt c�IL L gemOtt►J . F1ri is p L scv 4*1t•17-1 p�E est,Deo wr4 t IJ dME rJ a 4 ls- , PibaPtezcly is N 51- ., p1 1ccLk I- rt3iT�4i', EKc..&PT F -c-vps Ode.VrstoNM- OfEsei4cE D F SoN c.,(3 . • Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: NeIE a&U I IQEO , • • 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? W t u. (.1sE Et\letti hnto t\M71.a✓z. RL=sbu Ez otJL'( P c caMMot) T-d 0E'1 61-OP h i& i df= i4 pes I n'l'T i tOgsS a Fe-Ts. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: NEE emu 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? L,4 OLA ►J G i USE XFFEcr.- Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: -J IE RtyIV2�. - 11 - V 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? 0 ME RESTI21 cricx4 S IS h't' p,.PPL.1 c* R¢A1.11rS7'E2, ZA4ir!" IS Cc-11aPT.IB( E J1Tlr EKI%11'46, USE'S. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: Nam. RFC U I(e El)/ EX caP'(_ cal P°k-`r LA/1 n4 -4614,W • S7`»KDroC2-o.S 5uc44.. -sET►spc.v..S L1=4rlDSC4PI1.11., SGgEL'4.1W,, Efc,..' 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? • b,i /Nc2G"trE DL I�rtC6 o►J 772gr/son1, PUP.cd►c. sdiet/ Ica , ta-,1 ur c,I TI s, PA-S rbnaMla t- 4' S,M/L I e... "26- t DeNtii1°rc- Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: IUDIJts- j ctI126 fl-U- UTI Li r/E3 ,2E 114 onf-s o!`/ d°l` ,Jr � r T s , J M : -us NSA✓Icy , r° Tic Erys7' Tr+£ fR_oPE72T`9 7.,, Identify, if possible, whether,the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. kJ o. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: :To pI G. 77/0MP3-00 Name Printed: B y W RevcL M. C.4747/0,6 - /4-14 C4-4O14-1 /err Fax77i pAopixrpt,r) - 12 - D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (This sheet should only be used for actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs. Do not use this sheet for project actions.) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. • When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at.a_greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to Increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous sutstances; or production of noise? 1v.1c(2,E s E iF o 1 T►+2`1 5 EA NAO STtto 2:M SE"weQ.. . DI Sc_H•hR-IDIE• a N►-�1 As EL3,,rD To A ?_E5 o e: r1*.L ft&d 020,' J Ty2_orcaFtc f104,4 ISMtsStop4 Wiuu f RdOuK-Ti oh) tom- USE`. VO K c- M t/5$L . Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: NaN'e Iles. 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, o marine life?• . E x t s rt ia ILL R eM ot , FI P4 1 s'4-e 3 L l S t nR-, If e" riplo eo W rt- E d t,E rJ 6.4 is T�. p?2P QSr{ IS Near 1b Iw 1F€ t IT EKcooT (-se(Z- 7-144g OccOrstON L { SEAcE 0,F soN c,„A t rams, . Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: P l lE 'Ea.( k , 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Nrco . Ny37\.1v3M.-- RLc-SbUrar—Es otJI✓'( A t caMr-ton) 'To c6-\I pe i O6-*.rn 10,E.SEzr, Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: Nb'(E VeEUt t2€ 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? OuL-0 KIc i XFF L-77 Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: jrai. E 12E 1.1,12€. - 11 - 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? 0 +• (ZESTI21 S p,-PPLt cm&u,L PkAUESTE0 Z l"\IcI IS Cr)MP14T'It_E W ►'n} EKIST)'`lG, (.ISES. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: NbWE Ra U I Fe.e°, sx 66:Pr' CO-1 P-'1 t^/1 n-4 s7r +z2.►as (Suc i4- tas , -5ETer>=-ItS Lp-c.1 o soaps ,, S c rearnl)rrei 1 E7'c.•' 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? W�u DErslo,tro5oiJ 772g-HJset) -T r,oNI, (ciautc., se-e✓Ica, to to unc..1 ii , Pr5 R' S/M/( /26- r pEtr7 Pr- pad Ezr, Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: • IUOtJr 0q:?,QUi26 • A•U- of Li r cs fi,2E /r/ f' ftr ", E7771E1 of,/ o - Jir - rb T s rr -, s M eus Ns J/ r° Tifc ems 7- rrF: lopoeEAe `1 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. . Np.. , SIGNATURE • I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: :TO Q/ G. T//cfl?Sort.) Name Printed: ay 6,4cvRevcE M• CA-fP,gE-G j ,--(4 C4-4-C'GH f 77t r°/tioPo -r) - 12 - - •71 i'. I' I• , • I4 �'•'' I• / 1 I 7' Y i �' -'AAIUN4 ..,..•:: . ... Nc �_ - . - a y�ws-iwrfCIIYE'o eurav o o 0 -nr- =-K 37Ry1T 6 - N,E. /.3 Z''-STREET 4. 0 0 iG) ;�+ k�j I - z 4, -��..4 .24L__ m_z7.,:t. . .'•0" - +sue }6 60.00' .14, .t r ,1 -ter _-. (� *_ - • r__r = - : - _-==-_=': � . ,•: �y .: \ ---_----_ - - - _-Ty--: r 1. a • --DRlvewAY �� 1 •' lyl p 1 II f6--41 • `.1 =DR/vel•YAy 1 • A .• - rE si /°LAN SCALE: /H2O' "•J' NOTE : S#ADED AREA DES/QNATES VT( of REQUESTED A'6701/6 • • BEGINNING OF FILE FILE TITLE � , , YV __ d. O6 de, • • • • • • May 4'. 1992 Renton City Council Minutes &A.a. GX B Page 196 Planning: Planning/Technical Services Division requested amendment to Resolution Comprehensive Plan #2878, Comprehensive Plan and Area-Wide Zoning Process (adopted & Area-Wide Zoning 1/27/92), to allow specific projects to be exempt from the resolution. Amendment (Res. Refer to Planning and Development Committee. #2878) Latecomer Agreement: Technical Services and Utility Systems Division submitted request for Little, Maple Ave. latecomer agreement, Thomas W. and Laura Little, for fire hydrant and NW, Fire eight-inch watermain installed in Maple Avenue NW, south of vacated Hydrant/Watermain NW Third Place. Refer to Utilities Committee. (LA-002-92) Public Works: Transportation Division requested approval of agreement with U.S. West Maintenance Cables & Communications to restate ownership and repair/replacement Conduit, Airport, responsibilities for wood conduits located underneath Airport runway, and U.S. West establish maintenance responsibility for additional cables and conduit. Refer to Transportation (Aviation) Committee. Public Works: Transportation Division requested authorization to increase maintenance Maintenance Staff staff (1.0 FTE) to maintain existing service levels and handle increased Increase, Valley Corn service requests from Valley Com; required expenditure $34,000, revenue generated $34,000. Refer to Transportation (Aviation) Committee. Streets: Soos Creek Transportation Division requested approval of agreement with INCA Plateau & Kent- Engineers, Inc. to prepare a route design and environmental impact report Renton Valley and to obtain corridor establishment for the construction of a section of Corridor, INCA Eng. new main arterial that will improve east-west accessibility between Soos Creek Plateau and Kent-Renton Valley; required expenditure $199,914.00. Refer to Transportation (Aviation) Committee. CAG: 90-079, Lk. Utility Systems Division submitted Task Order #8, CAG-079-90, with Washington #2 Lift RH2 Engineering, PS, to perform an engineering evaluation of Lake Station, RH2 Eng. Washington #2 lift station to determine replacement station type and layout, and prepare construction plans, specifications, and estimate for implementation of proposed replacement; required expenditure $75,753. Refer to Utilities Committee. Public Works: 1992 Utility Systems Division submitted 1992 Mosquito Abatement Program Mosquito Abatement Entomologist/Pest Control consultant agreement for Panther Creek Program Wetland. Refer to Utilities Committee. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS. AMENDED. CARRIED. Removed Items: Administrative Services requested approval of biennial budgeting Item 8.d: approach for the City of Renton. MOVED BY STREDICKE, Budget Biennial SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL REFER THIS Budget MATTER TO THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE. CARRIED. Item 8.q: Development Services Division requested approval of contract Planning: amendments with Bill Stalzer for completion of work on the PACCAR PACCAR/Orchards and Orchards Project and planning assistance on an on-call basis; (CAG-033-91) & Plan expenditure required $17,455 for PACCAR/Orchards project & $20,000 Review, Stalzer for as needed planning services. • (CAG-027-,91) CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Al #: g Submitting Data: PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS For Agenda of: May 4, 1 992 Dept/Div/Board.. PLANNING/TECHNICAL SERVICES DIVISION Staff Contact. KAY SHOUDY, PLANNING DIRECTOR Agenda Status Consent Subject: Public Hearing... AMENDMENT TO COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2878 - Correspondence.. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND AREA-WIDE ZONING PROCESS Ordinance Resolution X Old Business Exhibits: New Business ISSUE PAPER (ATTACHED) Study Sessions.... Other Recommended Action: Approvals: .Refer to Planning and Development Committee. Legal Dept X Finance Dept... Other Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated Summary of Action: Resolution 2878 passed by the City Council in January was intended to incorporate rezones and comprehensive plan amendments into a single process culminating in adoption of an interim land use element and area-wide zoning in December, 1992. At the time the resolution was adopted in January, 1992, a number of rezones were underway with a substantial investment in the projects. The proposed amendment would allow specific projects to be exempt from the Resolution and to continue forward in the review process. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Amendment to Resolution No. 2878 including list of exempt projects. ww/agnbillform/bh-jw CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: May 4, 1992 TO: City Council VIA: Mayor Clymer FROM: Lynn Q5.tt ann, Administrator Plan n 'glilding/Public Works STAFF CONTACT: Kay Shoudy, Planning Director SUBJECT: PROJECTS AFFECTED BY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2878 (COMP. PLAN PROCESS) Background Resolution 2878 was passed by the City Council on January 27, 1992, to incorporate proposed rezones and comprehensive plan amendments into a single process that would culminate with the adoption of the Interim Land Use Element and Areawide Zoning in December, 1992. At the time the Resolution was adopted, there were a number of rezone projects substantially underway ("in the pipeline") that would be affected by the procedures in the Resolution.. Issue The Long Range Planning Section has reviewed the "pipeline" projects to determine which should be exempt from Resolution 2878. Criteria used to identify exempt projects were: a. filing of a complete application and completion of all or a portion of the SEPA review; or b. completion of a public hearing or scheduling for a public hearing. Projects which had been formally withdrawn by the applicant will not be considered to be exempt from the Resolution. A list of projects proposed to be exempt are attached as Exhibit B. A draft amendment to the Resolution has also been prepared by the City Attorney (Exhibit A) to exempt projects these projects from the requirements of the Resolution. Recommendation The Planning Division staff recommends that the City Council adopt the proposed amendment to Resolution 2878, and that the attached list of projects be exempt from the process in the Resolution (Exhibit B). EXHIBIT A CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 2878 BY EXEMPTING CERTAIN APPLICATIONS FROM THAT RESOLUTION. WHEREAS, the City of Renton adopted Resolution No . 2878 which established a single process for rezones and comprehensive plan amendments until adoption of the new comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, certain projects were well advanced in the review and permitting process such that the city had received materially complete applications and the projects had undergone SEPA review; and WHEREAS, including those advanced projects within Resolution No . 2878 would work a hardship on the projects; and WHEREAS, it would be equitable to exempt those projects from the projects to be handled under Resolution No. 2878 . NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS : SECTION I . The above recitals are found to be true and correct in all respects . SECTION II . Land use amendments or rezones for which complete applications were received and substantial progress has been made in processing the application, including SEPA review, prior to the adoption of Resolution No . 2878 on January 27 , 1992 , will not be part of the area-wide zoning process under that Resolution but will proceed unaffected by that Resolution under the normal city scheduling process . A list of the projects to be 1 RESOLUTION exempted is attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein as if fully set forth. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 1992 . Marilyn J. Petersen, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 1992 . Earl Clymer, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RES . 206 : 4/18/92 :as . 2 EXHIBIT B Pipeline Projects To be Exempted from Resolution 2878 May 4, 1992 1. Book Bales Rezone (110-91) 1726 Duvall Rezone from G-1 to R-2 with Conditional Use STATUS: Scheduled for Hearing Examiner on April 14, 1992. 2. Tall Firs Townhomes (056-91) 4808 NE Sunset Blvd. 37 Townhomes Rezone from G-1 to R-2 STATUS: Scheduled for. the Hearing Examiner on April 14, 1992. 3. The Orchards (138-90) NE 8th and Duvall Ave. NE. 275 Multi-family units, 121 single family lots, 68 townhomes, 28,000 s.f. of commercial/office Contract rezone to R-3 STATUS: Scheduled for the Hearing Examiner on April 7, 1992 for Site Plan approval. 4. Kennydale Apartments (085-90) 4100 Block of Lincoln NE 198 units. of multi-family Rezone from G-1 to R-3 STATUS: Approved by the Hearing Examiner; Council put on hold (conditioned on Fire Benefit Zone). • 5. Malesis Rezone and Short Plat (050-90) 2202 Smithers Ave. So. Single family residential Rezone from G-1 to R-1 STATUS: Approved by Hearing Examiner; approval expires 9/18/92. 6. The Bluffs, east of L. Wash Blvd., west of 1-405 167 units multi-family Rezone from R-1 to R-3 STATUS: EIS completed; project not expected to proceed. • 7. Bakke, Inc. (107-88) N.E. 4th and Union Ave. SE 111 multi-family units Rezone from G-1 to R-3 and B-1 STATUS: Aproval will expire in April; have requested two-year extension from Hearing Examiner. 8. Forest Creste (093-88) Duvall and SE 124th 200 multi-family units Rezone from G-1 to R-3 STATUS: DEIS will be completed within month. 9. Dodi Thompson (045-88) 1222/1224 Kirkland Ave NE Rezone from R-2 to R-3 STATUS: Hearing Examiner recommended approval with restrictive covenants. 10. Sunset Gardens II/Crystal Heights (073-91) Rezone STATUS: (See attached letter from applicant). Sound • lanning `ter^ COrpO aLIon 10717 NE Fourth Street - Bellevue,WA 98004 Fax:206/646-9694 206/455-1822 n! ,};,in !ei, "l it April 13 , 1992 APR2 1992 Mrs Kay Shoudy. Manager Planning & Technical Services Department of Planning, Building and Public Works City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 • RE: CRYSTAL HEIGHTS/R-SA-073-91 EXEMPTION FROM RESOLUTION 2878 Dear Mrs . Shoudy: Thank you for taking a moment on Wednesday, April 8th, to discuss the impact of the implementation of Resolution 2878 on my client . I understand that you are requesting that the City Council specifically exempt certain land use applications that were in the planning process prior to January 1 , 1992 . My client, Cliff Mull , approached me back in June 1991 to prepare the rezone application for a multiple family project on the west side of Sunset Boulevard N.E. . His project known as "Crystal Heights" was submitted in October and assigned a file number of R-SA-073-91 . At our preliminary review, Mr. Don Erickson, requested that because of the geographic location, shape, size, topography, and history of neighborhood development that we attempt to enlarge the project to include the adjacent property owners . Over the last 6 months we have been proceeding and have expended over $35 , 000 . 00 in funds in following the request by staff . My client ' s reflect specific site and building design details that were required as part of the site plan submission. Presently, he is expending another $4, 000 . 00 for the conceptual storm water drainage plans. Since our time schedule would call for construction and occupancy by the summer of 1993, we would request that we be included your request for as an exemption to Resolution 2878 . Sincerely, Roger J . B aylock im. CITY OF RENTON planning/Buildii ''ublic Works Department _ Lynn Guttmann, Administrator Earl Clymer, Mayor PLANNING DIVISION CITY OFRENTON April 13, 1992 APR 1 3 1992 ECEIVED Roger Blaylock 10717 NE 4th Street, Suite 9 Bellevue, Washington 98004 Re: Your June 27, 1991 Application for Rezone and Site Plan Approval Crystal Heights Apartment Project--File #R-SA-ECF-073-91 Dear Mr. Blaylock: This letter is sent to formally advise you that we need additional information in order to further process the above-referenced Rezone/Site Plan Approval application. In July of last year we requested additional information (i.e. storratage plan wndreepmed rt) and recommended several revisions to the above-referenced application. the package to you, you indicated that revisions would be returned within a few weeks. To date, we have not yet received these revisions or the additional information we requested. Since it has been several months since your original application was submitted to us, we will need to return your application fees (80%) and close out the file if we do.not receive a complete application package by May 13, 1992. d As you know, we are presently working on a Comprehensive Laapplications.Use e.Playoprdate anu the on City Council has revised the rezone process through Technical Services.Division is closed out, you will have to re-apply the Planning (Long Range Planning) and await the final disposition of the Land Use Plan and associated zone changes. I have enclosed the current City of Renton "Rezone" and "Site Plan Approval Submittal Requirements". Please review the instruction sheets and let me know if you have any questions about the additional information that we require in order to expedite review of your Rezone/Site-Plan Approval application package. I can be reached at 235-2550. Sincerely, 6e,e7(.1-1 ¢:- Laureen Nicolay /% Associate Planner • enclosures • cc: Don Erickson Kay Shoudy. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 CITY OF RENTON P utsLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT REQUEST FOR INFORMATION OR CONCURRENCE DATE: April 21, 1992 TO: Larry Warren, City Attorney FROM: Lynn Guttmann CONTACT PERSON: Kay Shoudy (5546) SUBJECT: Amendment to Resolution No. 2878 Attached for your review, changes and/or comments is the agenda.'bi l l and attachments , am 2878 Please return to staff contact person for subsequent action by April 24 , 1992 Thank you. REVIEWER #1 CONCURRENCE: Name Date (orrna/concurgt/bh �% 0 CITi OF RENTON Office of the City Attorney Earl Clymer, Mayor Lawrence J. Warren. March 28, 1991 iNgEN • TO: Dick Anderson, Utility Systems Manager c\P R I 1991 FROM: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney CITY OF RENTON Engineering Dept RE: Jodi L. Thompson Rezone Restrictive Covenants Dear Dick: The Restrictive Covenants, as forwarded to me, are approved as to legal form. C--77;=-e-1J. Warren LJW:as . cc: Mayor Clymer A8 . 6 8 : 14 . PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON APR 9 1991 RECEIVED • • Post Office Box 626- 100 S 2nd Street-Renton,Washington 98057- (206) 255-8678 4 0 CITY OF RENTON Office of the City Attorney Earl Clymer, Mayor, Lawrence J. Warren. RECEIVED 3-a i-ckA PUIBUC WORKS PI . March 20, 1991 CffY OF RENTON TO: Lynn Guttmann, Administrator Department of Planning/Building/Public Works FROM: Anne Santos, Administrative Assistant RE: Jodi L. Thompson Rezone Dear Lynn: I am enclosing a copy of a letter from Melville Monheimer dated March 19 , 1991 concerning the Thompson rezone. This is the matter which Larry discussed with you -at the Mayor's Staff Meeting. 4-4 Anne Santos LJW:as . Encl . A8 . 67 :56 . . pLA�1�11`IG plVIS10�1 C1TY GF�tEN�®IU Post Office Box 626 - 100 S 2nd Street-Renton, Washington 98057- (206) 255-8678 • • r. (I M. MONHEIMER ' ` ' ATTORNEY AT LAW • 1 - Qn t•- - 802 EAST LYNN STREET MARp 1 9 1991 .SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98102 TELEPHONE:'(206)323-6985 March 19, 1991 MR. Lawrence J. Warren 100 S. Second St. PO Box 626 Renton. WA 98057 RE: Jodi L. Thompson Rezone Dear Larry. • I am writing this letter to set forth the suggestion which I made to you in our telephone conversation of this afternoon. . At the outset. I should state that the original application stated that the property► which was to be divided into two lots . contained 14.333 sq. ft.; the easterly lot. upon which Thompson planned to build, was to contain 7 ►200 sq. ft. , leaving 7 ►133 sq. ft in the other lot. Actually, the Assessor' s Map shows • •that there is only 14►322. 81 sq. ft. in the entire parcel . This would leave the easterly lot at 7 ,200 sq. ft. and the westerly lot at 7122. 81 sq. ft. . . . Thompson has followed your suggestion that he obtain a sur- vey to show the actual footage in the two lots. The surveyor has informed Thompson that it will take as much as two to three weeks before he can complete and prepare his survey. In an effort to save time. Thompson agrees that the survey will provide 7 .20.0 sq. ft. in the easterly► and whatever is left over will belong to the westerly lot, and when the survey is completed. Paragraph 2 of the Restrictive Covenants should be amended to conform to the survey. • With this understanding. Thompson asks for permission to proceed with his application for a building permit today, without having to wait until the survey. is completed and the amendment :of the Restrictive Covenants. It would be appreciated if you would give us an answer at your earliest convenience. Very truly yours, Melville Monheimer ~ - R-045-88 r Oct . 14 , 1988 CITY OF RENTON • TO: City of Renton OCT 2 6 1988 200 Mill Avenue South Ln Renton , Washington 98055 RECEIVED CITY CLERK'S OFFICE Cr ATTN : Maxine E. Motor - City Clerk U7RE: ,Jodi L. Thompson Rezone !"4 Rezone . 329 acres of property from R-2 , Low Density Residen- ,� tial Use , to R-3 Medium Density Residential Use. Property 00 located at 1222 & 1224 Kirkland Avenue N .E. ECF-045-88; R-045 p -88. Execution of RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS reflecting the follow- ing conditions : 1 . Not more than a total of six units shall be constructed on the subject site , which shall consist of the existing duplex , renovated or replaced by a new duplex on the westerly lot, and not more than four additional units to be constructed on the easterly lot.. • • 2. The applicant receive a lot line adjustment resulting in the westerly lot containing a total of 7, 133 square feet and the eastern lot : containing a total of 7 , 200 square feet . If the two individual lots are combined into one (1) legal lot , then this condition shall not be applicable 3. The development of any additional housing units on either lot shall be subject to Site Plan review. This condition shall apply whether the two . (2) lots are combined , or remain separate as per condition 2 . above . Legal Description of property is as . follows : Corrected Lot 1 , Block 11 .Fre =.bve Plat , Renton Highlands No . 2 according " to plat recorded in Vol . 57 of plats pages 92-98, in King County , Washington; except the easterly 60 feet . Together with: East 60 feet of Lot 1 , Block 11 , Corrective Plat , Renton Highlands No . 2 , according to the plat recorded in Vol . 57 of plats , pages 92-98 inclusive , in King County , Washington. Together with an ease- ment for ingress , egress and utilities over the following descri- • bed property: Beginning at the.- Northwest corner of the above de- scribed ; thence south 40 feet; thence west 40 feet; thence north 40 feet ; thence east 40 feet to the true point of beginning . • The above three (3) conditions are approved and ` tbb-th'ble as 40.195 11=1 written . RECCE P 6. 00 CASHSL 4:4:$::+4;.on // 55 . iov z• A• /he,if>,ra-t/ FHB FOR REUUH,I AT REQUESTDF: Jodi L. Thompson Date /0 /c.?6 /cPc ' . OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK RENTON MUNICIPAL BLDG. 200 MILL AYE.SO. a ,,� /N e7 RENTON,WA98855 �'� • • STATE OF ,4 t7L • ee xt/F CITY OF RENTON _+L Office of the City Attorney r Clymer, Mayor Lawrence J. Warren C.\-4; CITY Or RENTON March 20 , 1991 MAR % 1199 TO: Lynn Guttmann, Administrator Department of Planning/Building/Public Works t:::•;=EVEL) ._;IT'Y CLERK'S OFFICE FROM: Anne Santos, Administrative Assistant RE : Jodi L. Thompson Rezone Dear Lynn: I am enclosing a copy of a letter from Melville Monheimer dated March 19 , 1991 concerning the Thompson rezone . This is the matter which Larry discussed with you at the Mayor ' s Staff Meeting. 4,eziek Anne Santos LJW: as . Encl . A8 . 67 : 56 . T�nct rcc; o Rnv g7^ _ inn c 'JTri C+.- At _ TJAritrrn Wne}linntnn OQns? - OM) 'Sc_Rtc7$ M. MONHEIMER i- \` '(�, ATTORNEY AT LAW • 802 EAST LYNN STREET MAR 1 9 1991 SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98102 TELEPHONE:(206)323-6985 March 19, 1991 MR. Lawrence J. Warren 100 S. Second St. PO Box 626 Renton, WA 98057 RE: Jodi L. Thompson Rezone Dear Larry, I am writing this letter to set forth the suggestion which I made to you •in our telephone conversation of this afternoon. At the outset, I. should state that the original application stated that the property, which was to be divided into two lots , contained 14, 333 sq. ft. ; the easterly lot, upon which Thompson planned to build, was to contain 7 , 200 sq. ft. , leaving 7 ,133 sq. ft in the other lot. Actually, the Ass.essor ' s Map shows that there is only 14,322 . 81 sq. ft. in the entire parcel.. This would leave the easterly lot at 7 , 200 sq. ft . and the westerly lot at 7122. 81 sq. ft. . Thompson has followed your suggestion that he obtain a sur- vey to show the actual footage in the two lots . The surveyor has informed Thompson that it will take as much as two to three weeks before he can complete and prepare his survey. In an effort to save time, Thompson agrees that the survey will provide 7 ,200 sq. ft. in the easterly, and whatever is left over will belong to the westerly lot, and when the survey is completed, Paragraph 2 of the Restrictive Covenants should be amended to conform to the survey. With this. understanding. Thompson asks for permission to proceed with his application for a building permit today, without having to wait until the survey is completed and the amendment of the Restrictive Covenants . It would be appreciated if you would give us an answer at your earliest convenience . Very truly yours, Melville Monheimer •. 7 P I R-045-88 Oct . 14 , 1988 • CITY OF FIENTON TO: City of Renton • OCT 2 6 1988 200 Mill Avenue South Renton , Washington 98055 • CITY RE KISOFUFICE .14 ATTN : Maxine E. Motor — City Clerk 0 113 RE : Jodi L. Thompson Rezone • Rezone . 329 acres of property from R-2 , Low Density Residen- • tial Use , to R-3 Medium Density Residential Use . Property located at 1222 & 1224 Kirkland Avenue N .E. ECF-045-88 ; R-045 CO -88 . Execution of RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS reflecting the follow- ing conditions : . . ' ' 1 . Not more than a total of six units shall be constructed on the subject site , which shall consist of the existing duplex , renovated or replaced by a new duplex on the westerly lot , and not more than four additional units to be constructed on the easterly lot'. • 2 . The applicant receive a lot line adjustment resulting in the westerly lot containing a total of 7 , 133 square feet and the eastern lot : containing a total of 7 , 200 square feet . If the two individual lots are combined into one . ( 1) legal lot , then this condition shall not be applicable 3. The- development of any additional housing units on either lot shall be subject to Site Plan review. This condition shall apply whether the two . (2) lots are combined , or remain -separate as per condition 2 . above . • Legal Description of property is as . follows : • Corrected • Lot 1 , Block 11 "G' .art =Fve Plat , Renton IIighl.ands No .. 2 according • " to plat recorded in Vol . 57 .of plats pages 92-98, in King County , ` Washington ; except the easterly 60 feat . Together with : . East 60 feet of Lot 1 , Block 11 , Corrective Plat , Renton Highlands • No . 2 , according to the plat recorded in Vol . 57 of plats , pages 92-98 inclusive , in King County , Washington . Together with an ease- • ment for ingress , egress and .utilities over the following descri- • bed property : Beginning at the.. Northwest corner of the above de- • • . scribed ; thence south 40 feet ; thence west 40 feet ; thence north 40 feet ; thence east 40 feet to the true point of beginning . The above three (3) conditions are . approved and }be,.C�pp.•thble as 1004195 11= written . RECC' F £. Gild CRSHSL >►:.:4::1:F,.no i / L/, . •Vo� [, .L_ . / �' -,,A.) FitEJ FOR RCCUI;U AT REQUEST UF: Jodi L . ThoMps6n Date /Q /o? lcs . OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK • .c % RENTON MUNICIPAL BLDG. ''y"`' 20O MILL AYE.S0. a g iN c"X" ;, RENTON,WA 98855 • STATE OF 445 1 Planning/Building/Public Works Department City of Renton Memorandum Date: September 25, 1990 To: Fred J. Kaufman Hearing Examiner From: Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator Lenora Blauman Project Manager Subject: Thompson Rezone (R 045-88) (AAD 095-90) This memorandum is written to address an appeal of a determination concerning the reclassification of the property at 1222 Kirkland Avenue North and 1224 Kirkland Avenue North from R-2 to R-3 to enable future development of the subject parcel (s) with multi-family residential uses. The subject of the appeal is a request for clarification as to requirements established (in conjunction with reclassification) for site plan approval for new development on the property. The project files indicate that, at the time of the review and public hearing for reclassification, staff recommended this rezone action be supported with the intended condition that any change to type or density of use, including each/all new development and/or redevelopment of the property be subject to site plan review. The purpose of this condition was to ensure that development on this site would be consistent with existing development on the property and with uses on neighboring properties. If you have questions, or would like additional information please contact me or Lenora Blauman at Ext. 2550. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, Renton, Washington, on September 25, 1990 at 3:00 p.m. to consider the following petitions: Jody Thompson Rezone AAD-095-90 Rezone .329 acres,of property from R-2, Low Density Residential Use, to R-3, Medium Density Residential Use.. Property includes site currently developed with two duplex units. This is a nonproject, programmatic rezone; however, the applicant's stated intent is to add two new four-plexes to this site and to upgrade the existing duplexes. The project is located at 1222 and 1224 Kirkland Avenue Northeast. All interested persons to said petitions are invited to be present at the Public Hearing on September 25, 1990 at 3:00 p.m.to express their opinions. Publication Date: September 14, 1990 Account No.51067 1 ;yw",_ CITY OF RENTON a „u. �i Hearing Examiner — Fred J.Kaufman Earl Cl1�mer, Mayor / 4-dal/ l August 21, 1990 Weldon Thompson 0C 528 Rainier Avenue South #36 Renton, WA 98055 'Re: Appeal of Determination for Site Plan Approval of Kirkland Avenue/Thompson Four-Plex File #R-045-88 AAD-095-90 Dear Mr. Thompson: We are in receipt of your letter of August 8, 1990 setting out an alleged basis for an appeal of the above determination. The hearing date for this appeal has now been scheduled for 3 : 00 P.M. on Tuesday, September 25, 1990. The hearing will be held in the council chambers located on the second floor of the Renton Municipal Building. Due to time constraints of all parties, it is important that the above date and time be adhered to by everyone. If there are any questions, please contact this office. Sincerely, • FRED J. UFMAN HEARING EXAMINER FJK/dk cc: Lawrence Warren, City Attorney Planning Department Building Department • nonce _ (' A \ q CITY 'IF RENTON Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann, Administrator July 30, 1990 Weldon Thompson 6820 51st Avenue South Seattle, Washington 98118 SUBJECT: Kirkland Avenue/Thompson Four-Plex--Approval Process Required City file#R-045-88 Dear Mr.Thompson: As you requested, I have reviewed your preliminary project plans and made a determination as to the process necessary to obtain a building permit for the above-referenced project. You will need to obtain administrative site plan approval for the project prior to submitting a building permit since site plan approval was required by the City Council as a condition of approving a 1988 rezone for the site. The August 16, 1988 Planning Department staff report to the Hearing Examiner included a recommendation that the Hearing Examiner recommend approval of the rezone provided that any future development be subject to site plan approval (see page 5 of the staff report, attached). The August 24, 1980 Hearing Examiner's Report and Recommendation also included a recommendation that"the development of any additional housing units on either lot shall be subject to Site Plan Review" (see recommendation#3, Page 4 of the report, attached). The City Council conditionally approved the rezone on November 14, 1988, subject to the findings, conclusions and decision of the Hearing Examiner. Condition #3 of the restrictive covenants (filed with King County in 1988, #881 1 1 50495, attached) states that"the development of any additional housing units on either lot shall be subject to site plan review." Although site plan review is not mandatory for all four-plexes, it is my interpretation that the Council wanted site plan review for this site in order to assure"sensitive, compatible development"with the surrounding property. This interpretation is also consistent with both the Planning Staff and Hearing Examiner recommendations. Appeals of this administrative determination must be filed with the City's Land Use Hearing Examiner, along with the required $75.00 filing fee,within fourteen days of this letter. If you have any questions regarding this administrative determination or the appeal process, please contact Laureen Nicolay at 235-2550. e Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator cc: preapplication file °Mile#R-045-88 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2631 �$ ': CITY OF RENTON FINANCE DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk February 20, 1989 Ms. Jodi L. Thompson 6820 51st Avenue South Seattle, Washington 98118 RE: Jodi L. Thompson Rezone - R-045-88 Dear Ms. Thompson: Enclosed is a copy of your restrictive covenants recorded under King County Auditor's number 8811150495. If we can be of further assistance in this matter, please feel free to call. Sincerely, CITY OF RENTON M ilyn J. Petersen, CMC Deputy City Clerk cc: Lawrence Campbell, Architect Hearing Examiner Planning-Current Public Works Department Enclosure MJP/gn 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2501 24 9 16 lITY OF RENTON,WASHING ORDINANCE NO.4187 An Ordinance of the City of Washington changing the zoning ciassrfica- tion of certain properties within the City of AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Renton from R-2, Low Density Residential Use, to R-3, Medium Density Residential Use(Thompson—R-045-88). IV Audrey Benner ,beingfirst dulysworn on oath states WHEREAS, under Chapter 7, Title o. (Building Regulations) of Ordinance No. that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the 1628 known as the "Code of General Ordi- nances of the City of Renton," as amend- ed, and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the property herein- VALLEY DAILY NEWS below described has heretofore been zoned as R-2, Low Density Residential • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition Use;and WHEREAS, a proper petition for change Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week.That said newspapers of zone classification of said property has are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six been filed with the Planning Division on or months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published about May 26, 1988, which petition was in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King duly referred to the Hearing Examiner for County,Washington.The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal investigation, study, and public hearing, and a Public Hearing having been held newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for thereon on or about August 16, 1988, and King County. said matter having been duly considered by the Hearing Examiner, and said zoning request being in conformity with the City's The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the Kent Edition Comprehensive Plan, as amended, and the , Renton EditionAuburn Edition City Council having duly considered alls x , (and not in matters relevant thereto, and all parties supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers having been heard appearing in support duringthe below statedperiod.The annexed notice a thereof or in opposition thereto; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUN- Ordinance No. 4187 CIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASH- INGTON,DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: was published on biov'mbA-r 1A-, 1_988 B3245 SECTION I: The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby rezoned to R-3, Medium Density Residen- tial Use, as hereinbelow specified, subject to the findings, conclusions, and decision The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the of the Hearing Examiner dated August 24, 1988; the Planning Manager is hereby sum of $5 4 •`=U authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance, as amend- ed,to evidence said rezoning,to-wit: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and �/��/� made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein. (Said property, 0.329 acres, being locat- ed at 1222 and 1224 Kirkland Avenue N.E.) Subscribed and sworn to before me this 29 th dayof Nov 19 8 8 and subject further to Restrictive Cove- nants filed under Auditor's File No. 8811150495. SECTION II: This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and five days after its publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 14th day of November, 1988. Maxine E.Motor,City Clerk Notary Public for the State of Washington, APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 14th residing at Federal Way, day of November, 1988. Earl Clymer,Mayor King County, Washington. Approved as to form: Lawrence J.Warren,City Attorney VDN#87 Rev,sed 11 86 Date of Publication: November 18, 1988 EXHIBIT"A" Lot 1, Blk 11 Corrected Plat of Renton Highlands No. 2 according to Piat recorded in Vol 57 of Plats Page 92-98 in King Coun- ty,Washington. Published in the Valley Daily News Nov. 18, 1988. R3245.Acct.#50640 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 4187 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM R-2, LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL USE, TO R-3, MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL USE (THOMPSON - R-045-88) . WHEREAS, under Chapter 7, Title IV (Building Regulations) of Ordinance No. 1628 known as the "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, " as amended, and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the property hereinbelow described has heretofore been zoned as R-2, Low Density Residential Use; and WHEREAS, a proper petition for change of zone classification of said property has been filed with the Planning Division on or about May 26, 1988, which petition was duly referred to the Hearing Examiner for investigation, study, and public hearing, and a Public Hearing having been held thereon on or about August 16, 1988, and said matter having been duly considered by the Hearing Examiner, and said zoning request being in conformity with the City' s Comprehensive Plan, as amended, and the City Council having duly considered all matters relevant thereto, and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I : The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby rezoned to R-3, Medium Density Residential Use, as hereinbelow specified, subject to the findings, conclusions, and decision of the Hearing Examiner dated August 24, 1988; the Planning 1 ORDINANCE NO. 4187 Manager is hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to evidence said rezoning, to-wit: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein. (Said property, 0 . 329 acres, being located at 1222 and 1224 Kirkland Avenue N.E. ) and subject further to Restrictive Covenants filed under Auditor's File No. 8811150495 SECTION II : This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and five days after its publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 14th day of November 1988 . Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 14th day of November 1988 . Earl Clymer, Mat" App ed as to form: Lawrence J. arren, City Attorney Date of Publication: November 18, 1988 ORD.57 : 9-14-88 :as . 2 Ordinance No. 4187 EXHIBIT "A" Lot 1, Blk 11 Corrected Plat of Renton Highlands No. 2 according to Plat recorded in Vol 57 of Plats Page 92-98 in King County, Washington LU.'L.L.i 0 • q . . 40+\'' ti) LU •4',...!.N.1)it5i.ti 1:44 I.1 .. i' L. . ". .• !.. .. . .*. • ., . 7 g ii,/ > tt. tics) 43- %\- , 0. 1A9‘ 1::4 - - > . 3.80-4-..; E 40.44 1.. 7 4 • -- - • ' .. • . • .. 0 < •n) 13 T11.rL. . . • ,..... . . 0 /2 3•8 3 • ... . -7.13- • 75-48 . " . ." \ • •N • ,.• . • r. N 0 . . o A 6 4 1- .4.' ::... „00 . z ..r.T..' . .. :....,, .... . .. • 0 \c.° •:'' 0. .• • .- n. Of /67a 14" .1:° , Z' . : 0 (2+ .. • Z 0 (A° "KB c3--1-Z-14 E 0 7,5:4.t••••••! rg ... ' io7:5--- • v. . --• S. ... NO9- 4 fq . (:)..9 ' .....•: . P.Z ' 0.E__ . 1 • /3 0 CC /40•4•Z• 7 * 0 .• . V 0 N° • 01:10.0 . . oa i 6.• " •I LLJ 1,, r -Ii6 ••• . 4 . . • /62 5 Li_ 6. .., 15°5- < • • 3 • • • •• • ' cti/3 . • ' • • ' • 7.4". '?Cf:7't .. .' Ai :... . 1 . u_ „ ,, . ( 4 *) LI I .. /4'1 .. //7. 7 f l r1::'. t•S)4.Arrtif.'7 $11.. ,.., stAi ,,L-. . . .. . .. ... tz, 8 X see-..I'X-/ig hfiq.79 -340.• :-.?,. ...s. . • .. •4:.......1.. ' . 00 . ....._ .......• Ar TN: pl.... :.1 • . A c.--- ' ^.- •-• 7e#Pr:.. i . .- •••• • • 74- ?.5.04 :. ' • 4- ,i I • • • /2_ 13'i '3 tp---- 0 .--. . ,. .. • ... . \. • 0 f • ., .. • 15' t1.519 .., . .Ye * N ; 1.. • . 161f) co • . , • Ali' - ., ...- -': ' • - 9• P. 0• ' ,,.4" .,...40 .r+I. • :''' 1b35 t‘f na.6 6 t` ' ..... . ...x.., , . 15,- .. - . ,5 IC. (47 0 ..; • ,, ... . P' • •:,,...i :.• . • .N It 3 a.' h • N L . . .e • a) to . N .- is •I 0 " • 70•5''f-; ,0 . •,. • ' "•o N 9 6 ‘1 . 03 ' 01 ........-.1 \ 04 • ‘ • . of 1 .4'1' • .! // - . ,.; of •./60..i 4 - '4 " '• . • i.d lA . ';'. . •• • t:,•• • .,. • .o, ,I.61'" .ril .. • 0,3 i ti- tO S. • „ CI,° .• . . . . `. S(113 r;TO . . .0 o2 • \ too ,5‘ ' • 7.`• /slo \ v 11. V ' 1, :4•.. ..; i 4 •. o w4/ift z.e.' it_ 1 ' % " ' •A • 7 . :. / 4.i3 .'° • 3 • /o2.8 7 i' .70-.1" ' ,5--- ' • 74'/7 • S.1,...:1-E.• ',". . .,. S T.-,. ... ,. • . g . --- . il • .. . 4..% 1i/ •. ..' .. ..• .. .'' 4 . • 4/ -•."' I.% ' -t t.Y::._...I.. -'i0n ••'`•.0e' 8q1 4A 6 i\ •; .. :,.., "• ' - •:".4''.'('..4A`..i'., nit'•:,•.-1-6I7I.'7•7A4/.ATv..Ailo. . . * I T0 ' . . . .a • • . . 4"` , /645 , 14 _. 'I- - /50 2.0% ...!.•"""; .. . •,.• L44t4 .01)0.s, --- • ' 0-) • I..; . S, ‘I- . • ''•'..,;*.• • 09" • . 1.6 -- 1‘) l . .. //A 2. '1- • 1\9 _ . . - ,. fi -• o . I- -. e_Ajialig,.:La& ,.; ,.,../1. , • 4. ., 457.4/•'. . 1 N i 4.:- 4:- - • . /8 4 •- '04 ' 0 51 . . _ .. . . S. 0 ,3 • Nii , , . , 9 At. o- ..•-•- j...isi a.-.• • * ..,.. , 1 II,- '47.., °' rn )3 ki as - \ •; u•N cv 4 \co __*...,._ _ _ __ _ . p i°8127. 44 1,. • o% I, . • * ' % 1°\ 1 .. ..... , I. -li 0) • 0. \ .• ig. • • I. s '.' , .r '..'%..• -I .• . . • 0 • •• '' i °Li i.:'•-• • '' A-I-A-Si , 1 ° . AC. „^)0 • .. • •••. • f i."1- 0, 0 • ., /8A t . .. `.4. • •,.. • ., , N: ' ' ' • . . .. • 61 ol ' (2 ./ A-cr ; ‘< r''- 0''''" :' •a . : 74- k.) .... 1 it • ,• 00' :.4e. I-- /6515 • - : •.,i. 1014..1. :•• V% •3 •. .,. I-. .. • .,.). Nin, t EN • , o• • 30.34 i/3 0 'o f Ne9-22-40.e.' .; . :J. 4-1 ' ....•:Ito'f'd:4'44 r.' ----7 ' . • () •. . •- f • 'i.i'' re- . . . ' 4-2,11t*/ • ''.•!. '';( . As-/.op -, ' l'P / ,.. • ' '`; ••• ,oe .• •-• ottsi ^Ni °.- o 1 ,• ^ • • P°R• . 01664 ':.c: ' (0. it . A Ac'' '6. --•••;ri. .-,- -0.::''• 4i , '11.• all' ' ? - .14 '• 1.5 24" re 1 t..•.---7 415':L1.1•-•• •-1" . 4-6A 11 -,,1 - . •ft.. 4-.1,.:. '• b- 1 \N'St3,•r•-.,. lo'N.•.3,, 6,1.1- 4'. - ['le.° '...'.1"•1 • . ..4.1:•-•'t 1 1./• .01 .. ,„:/p4'.... • : ).'.,...‘• • .., 511* .v.rt. , ,.1 '• NI . • .' i'''''''...- 4t5•' ' -1-H• . .'14 .4C2r. ....41':•. '•• .)r,•..1.: .9, .,,. 7.,...., CITY OF R E N T O N .. - . ,,•>c,,,...,147,-5-. . AT .„..5% ‘._,) . -. ..‘i •i •). .vi.....,. 4 '-...... ,.. .4:v.['t • - . i ..7 . --'`. r-. •. ..- L . .Z t. - ..• .--:- ,. 4,;•.,.,..• :.-....,, . :Az-FA: '• ••• ,-.i<:.-.7-.,-.--.,....‘7. - .......,. ••%p.c., ..3f.I••••.. ". 1 . • t...'',. ; -.•'..• ,•,...,:,... . • .• •.'"•,'.;". ' , ...„..:..,.,.,it ••; ' sf /V .... DIFARTMAINT OF ru•Lic WORKS Exhibit Map For R 045-88 ------ ' --" , a THOMPSON . • . •:‘,.u..t.._ ...t....• .40 i -.7k-• • •• ' % . 1 .•.! .. • li....• Ni 2 :. : \ • L : k DICSIONIO DATE-- IOU(HO. ? • ` l... . . 1 ''. . , . . . DRAWN ' ' - • • CIOICIWO 'MALI /IRO•00.L---1.•%-.. APPROVID etIEWT-0?-- _. 40 CITY OF REN1ON iS IBA • 'ti FINANCE DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk November 17, 1988 Jodi L. Thompson 6820 51st Avenue South • Seattle, Washington 98118 Re: Jodi L. Thompson Rezone - R-045-88 Dear Ms. Thompson: The Renton City Council at its regular meeting of November 14, 1988, adopted Ordinance No. 4187 changing the zoning classification from R-2, Low Density , Residential, to R-3, Medium Density Residential. A copy of the ordinance is enclosed for your records. Please contact this office if you have further questions. Yours truly, CITY OF RENTON {� Maxine E. Motor, CMC City Clerk • cc: Lawrence Campbell, Architect Weldon Thompson Hearing Examiner • Zoning Division Enclosures 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2501 Department of Assessments ATTENTION: Abstract St .on - Al Martin O F R� 709F King County Adminy ,.-:ration Building Seattle, WA 98104 �j, OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK 0 PUBLIC RECORDS DIVISION C$ ® 1 rn The attached material comes to you in 94 qp• response to your recent request. O9gT�D SEPTE���Q Ordinance No. 4187 November 17, 1988 CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVENUE SOUTH RENTON, WA 98055 PHONE (206) 235-2500 Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk • • • • • • • • • • • • • :s: 4 November 14. 1988 Renton City Council Minute!- Page 323 Board/Commission: The Council and Commission discussed the Planning Division's existing work Planning Commission program as it continues into 1989. Beginning second quarter 1989, staff will 1989 Work Program have time available to begin new projects. Committee of the Whole concurred with the Commission's recommendation that the next project will be an update of the City-wide Comprehensive Plan. Staff will work with the Commission during first quarter 1989 to prepare a draft scope of work for that project for presentation to Council. Council concur. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL ADOPT THE CONSENT AGENDA WITH DELETION OF ITEM 4.f.. CARRIED. Item 4.f., Letter from Ralph Evans, 3306 NE 11th Place, Renton, referenced request CORRESPONDENCE: from Darlene Lang for 1989 Housing and Human Resources funding for the Appeal: Good Shepherd Good Shepherd group home proposal at 19th and Shelton, referred to Group Home Rezone Committee of the Whole (Budget Committee) on 11/7/88. Mr. Evans (Olympia Avenue NE), disputed information contained in the letter which referred to sharing of H & R-015-88 HR funds between the referenced group home and the proposed group home on Olympia Avenue NE. He indicated his finding that the two group homes are established under two separate and distinct corporations, and are related to two separate HUD contracts. In view of these findings, Mr. Evans felt that any delays relating to the Olympia site should not have any impact on the 19th Street site. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY KEOLKER- WHEELER, COUNCIL REFER THIS MATTER TO COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE (Budget Committee). Zoning: Legislation for Added: City Attorney requested review of zoning standards for establishments Topless Dancing and offering topless dancing and adult video booths. MOVED BY KEOLKER- Adult Video Booths WHEELER, SECONDED BY TRIMM, COUNCIL REFER THIS MATTER TO PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE. CARRIED. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways and Means Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke presented a report Committee recommending concurrence in the Mayor's appointment of Mr. Ruben Appointment: Personnel Hernandez Nieto. Mr. Nieto will begin his new duties on January 1, 1989. Director MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE MAYOR'S APPOINTMENT. CARRIED. Mr. Nieto expressed pleasure in joining the City of Renton and returning to the Pacific Northwest. Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke presented a report recommending the following ordinances for second and final reading: Ordinance #4185 An ordinance was read amending Chapter VI of Title VI (Police Regulations) Police: Animal Control of City Code entitled animals and fowls at large by combining sections, Legislation for Dangerous adding clarifying language, increasing and establishing fees, adding Dogs regulations of potentially dangerous dog and dangerous dog, and establishing an appeal process. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance #4186 An ordinance was read amending portions of Chapter 7 (Zoning) of Title IV Zoning: Hazardous Waste (Building Regulations) of City Code designating zoning requirements for Facility Zone hazardous waste treatment and storage facilities. MOVED BY STREDICKE, Designations SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance #4187 An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of property located Rezone: Thompson, R- at 1222 and 1224 Kirkland Avenue NE from R-2, low density multifamily 045-88 residential, to R-3, medium density multifamily use; Thompson; File No. R- 045-88. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke presented the following • ordinances for first reading: _ Vacation: VAC-88-003, An ordinance was read vacating a portion of Pelly Place North (102nd Place Pelly Place N., Friends of SE) lying north of N. 26th Street and east of Lake Washington Boulevard for Youth Friends of Youth; VAC-003-88. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. • :t WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT NOVEMBER 14, 1988 APPOINTMENT OF RUBEN HERNANDEZ NIETO, PERSONNEL DIRECTOR (Referred 11/7/88) The Ways and Means Committee recommends concurrence in the Mayor's appointment of Mr. Ruben Hernandez Nieto. Mr. Nieto will begin his new duties on January 1, 1989. ORDINANCES The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following ordinances for second and final reading: Animal Control Legislation for Dangerous Dogs Hazardous Waste Facility Zone Designation Ordinance Thompson Rezone, R-045-88, from R-2 to R-3 at 1222 and 1224 Kirkland Avenue NE to upgrade existing units and add two units on site The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following ordinances for first reading: Pelly Place N. Street Vacation (Friends of Youth) VAC-88-003 Latecomer Agreement Ordinance MOVING EXPENSES FOR NEWLY-HIRED DEPARTMENT HEADS (Referred 11/7/88) The Ways and Means Committee recommends a policy whereby moving expenses for department heads may be allowed when reasonable and appropriate up to a maximum of $2,000 after recommendation by the Mayor and review and approal by the City Council on a case-by-case basis. A_ a .r • Ways and Means Committee Committee Report November 14, 1988 Page Two CITY ATTORNEY BUDGET ADJUSTMENT (Referred 11/7/88) The Ways and Means Committee recommends concurrence in the request of the City Attorney for an adjustment of $7,500. Due to a major increase in prosecutions stemming from increased enforcement and anti-abortion actions, the budget for the prosecutor will be inadequate for the remainder of the year. 1989 COST OF LIVING INCREASE FOR NON-REPRESENTED EMPLOYEES • (Referred 11/7/88) The Ways and Means Committee recommends approval of a 3.3% increase for non-represented . employees for 1989. BUDD LATECOMER AGREEMENT The Ways and Means Committee recommends that this matter be referred to the Ways and Means Committee for proper legislation. 1;1100 Richard Stredicke, Chairman IltiAttibiliffV/AIAD Nancy Math s CYGtAi ,4-- Robert J. Hughes 0 DLCr'� -� \ c CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 4187 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM R-2, LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL USE, TO R-3, MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL USE (THOMPSON - R-045-88) . WHEREAS, under Chapter 7, Title IV (Building Regulations) of Ordinance No. 1628 known as the "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, " as amended, and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the property hereinbelow described has heretofore been zoned as R-2, Low Density Residential Use; and WHEREAS, a proper petition for change of zone classification of said property has been filed with the Planning Division on or about May 26, 1988, which petition was duly referred to the Hearing Examiner for investigation, study, and public hearing, and a Public Hearing having been held thereon on or about August 16, 1988, and said matter having been duly considered by the Hearing Examiner, and said zoning request being in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan, as amended, and the City Council having duly considered all matters relevant thereto, and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS : SECTION I : The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby rezoned to R-3, Medium Density Residential Use, as hereinbelow specified, subject to the findings, conclusions, and decision of the Hearing Examiner dated August 24, 1988; the Planning 1 • ORDINANCE NO. 4187 Manager is hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to evidence said rezoning, to-wit: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein. (Said property, 0 . 329 acres, being located at 1222 and 1224 Kirkland Avenue N.E. ) and subject further to Restrictive Covenants filed under Auditor's File No. 8811150495 SECTION II : This Ordinance shall • be effective upon its passage, approval, and five days after its publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 14th day of November 1988 . Maxine E . Motor, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 14th day of November 1988 . Earl Clymer, Mato`z• Appr ed as to form: )) Lawrence J. arren, City Attorney Date of Publication: November 18, 1988 ORD.57 : 9-14-88 :as . 2 Ordinance No. 4187 EXHIBIT "A" Lot 1, Blk 11 Corrected Plat of Renton Highlands No. 2 according to Plat recorded in Vol 57 of Plats Page 92-98 in King County, Washington > ' /4 0 1 o 0 > B/6/� • a S 0-4 -/4 E /a°•4•1. • : •. . ‹.0 Q • • (0 /371/.11. /2 : { 7 s 7s•49 - • 311c h \boo O. ti� . •0ti� .°` t... ' - o ti /62o a /� ts1' NB9-..1 E ° ° N. O) •aa ---. Z N. • 1v89-z i; '40t • vI � i /x042 o s co /3 a 7 q O,,'kp ' i,, °1�t1 4..: . W Z • I. . 41451 r rt q ^j`' ` �7 10 8 Cry 589-sR-'.4E }8q•79 38.3 . .T �:.:.!.�. r . ' . 74- 7J.A4 1.. h ,• o /s 'c ` /Z. �� 6'' 0 0� / �' � `' ' : 5s. • 1< I 1635 //4.1i6 N 61 9 ^ y 0\'. D 9 :. . _ '3,y1T �0 , .r ia' /30 . n . ' • fIt ..: ;°. • • /6, 14. k v 9y /,y('0 ^ ' 1 N 1 t13�1.6 4; // .. . _ .— M /d'01 q. '.. ' - O °0 ' , 15 .. /690 1 V -�1 60 k ��zo • ` co- o25s • -; • 3�.13 • /3 to ` t (n /09.87 i l0.S' • 7s ' 74./{7 • ` S••./•.T E.. _ .:ti p1 ° S T: 1.. N- E. • I �H. ,.: .• • • -. . • ;� I . ---. - o • /8/.22 '•�� 19 T m- •/.�..3q. /oo . -i. 14? 1 '-t0,A. o • a4gd ., ,91.A, �� 60 .. i . _.... /64s �. 0 •1 i �, '^ v T • I•. N 1-,,.: -. /50 1� �,}1 .. 2.p� ..sr: P • ./ 9,6'�`IQ5 1 b�gt4.� ._. _I 1 ay 0% • ///.L 0� tu 1�— '' J1.41 • _3 Bh'tS4•1Q /S/•4/ ' 4� / �;.. 4 /8 v v�B `053�Q,'�N • i.. .. 1 49 At . • . z o. , . r I.. /651 •' /af1..x7' , D` r, n °4 \°' —' S.- - _ . — 1 �4 a;; _,R. • fit ' •tiro\ ..... ... :. • ° T' 1 /•°,1.:. •-.• . .. /sisto I oa, .31A I. , o /8A g o 4 �^ v 0 a ) '1 ^K 30.34 1/30 n .-ri,....j 1, '0y �•. qF NB9-22•AQ•!C • . - h 't:r-.:.765%04 . .' • ; Ill..... re o qb$� a, • 1 b a,l* . �r ,!; • . . „ •/�� rl ..Q• •`0 `4 A`•, nA� �1.„p -1 ••' �; • •'31g6 ` �,,.ra- x� I3 6. I '�-7 .6_ IF•M:�:"1 , 5.• �• i • i�6 op, ' ,"p �!:;_ ....... V.►o 411 • ts FAT........7 .;.'-< f..�• _H H. . ? "d.v^ " r`;: :, CITY OF R E N T O N •,•,. /. :y• l: • • .• • 1 „ DtrA11TMtNT Or rU�LIC WORKS • } :� +; . ',r tr ��,-.:;<:�. i�, ',i.I • Exhibit Map For R 045-88 �. �,^ _ ' ; :..: .,c ,..:ati. ; • �. THOMPSON ..(e 'i 1, . . DS•IONSD OATS PILS NO. s DRAWN CNRCKSO •CALS 'ORD.00• P•••_ A►r110VSD •N••i O►_—_ —_ 2I!I(12&41➢lllin➢a al S — R-045-88 Oct . 14, 1988 CITY OF RENTON TO: City of Renton OCT 2 6 1988 200 Mill Avenue South • Renton, Washington 98055 RECEIVED 0) CITY CLERK'S OFFICE Tr ATTN: Maxine E. Motor - .City Clerk . 1/7 RE: Jodi L. Thompson Rezone !'� Rezone . 329 acres of property from R-2, Low Density Residen- T4 tial Use , to R-3 Medium Density Residential Use . Property located at 1222 & 1224 Kirkland Avenue N.E. ECF-045-88; R-045 ao • -88. Execution of RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS reflecting the follow- ing conditions : . _ 1 . Not more than a total of six units shall be constructed on the subject site , which shall consist of the existing duplex, renovated or replaced by a new duplex on the westerly lot , and not more than four additional units to be constructed on the easterly lot . 2. The applicant receive a lot line adjustment resulting in the westerly lot containing a total of 7, 133 square feet and the eastern lot containing a total of 7, 200 square • feet . If the two individual lots 'are combined into one ( 1) legal lot, then this condition shall not be applicable • . ' 3 . The development of: any additional housing units on either lot shall be subject to Site Plan review. This condition shall apply whether the two (2) lots are combined, or remain separate as per condition 2. above. Legal Description of property is as . follows : Corrected Lot 1 , Block 11. FF kve .Plat , Renton Highlands No . 2 according -to plat recorded' in Vol . 57 of plats pages 92-98, in King County, Washington; except the easterly 60 feet. Together with: East 60 feet of Lot 1 , Block 11 , Corrective Plat , Renton Highlands No . 2 , according to the plat recorded in Vol. 5,7 of plats , pages 92-98 inclusive , in King County , Washington. Together with an ease- ment for ingress , egress and utilities over the following descri- .. bed property: Beginning at the Northwest corner of the above de- scribed ; thence south 40 feet; thence "west 40 feet ; thence north 40 feet ; thence east 40 feet to the true point of beginning . The above three (3) conditions are approved and atCVpttile as *O495 itR written. RECC' F E. 00 CPSH=•L ti:ro: :^i:r , 0 • ,/ob L • I iie,sly�tw FILED FOR REM�i AT REQUEST if: Jodi L. Thompson Date ,(� / �'� /d�� . OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERKz AeL--63;:d.„.-..,2RENTON MUNICIPAL BLDG. /� 200 MILL AYE SO. / /tT ev✓ a e RENTON,WA 98055 - - 4 • • STATE OF }H- ss. County of /'c.5 q On this s2(v a day of Cc' ,A. D. 19i f,before me,the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of V✓ r4,0 r7T4' , duly commissioned and sworn personally appeared 4• 2•7A es - 57.:7-41./P�,r1 to me known to be the individual who executed the foregoing instrument as attorney in fact of =. / i;. �rf �PS,0.r� n therein described, and acknowledged to me that he signed and sealed the said instrument as such attorney in fact n for said principal, freely and voluntarily, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that the power 1 of attorney authorizing the execution of this instrument has not been revoked and that the said z,' X. NP_5:e2ai is now living. r4WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year in this certificate first above written. JONotary Public in and for the State of- 4 an residin S (Acknowledgment by Attorney in Fact. TICOR TITLE INS RAN E'COMPANY. Form L 30) - r ,_r. C. ;r-,,,•,, • . 4 • 1 . • i TO: I^CIA 6.114- 1 DATE: )p-(.1 438 FROM: CITY CLERK'S OFFICE SUBJECT: n�� ^ . ! ko-yvA st-y, Er:?_eync._ 2- V`1--C 88 Please furnish the following to the City Clerk's Office: Certification of Posting Legal Description Certification of Valid Petition Map Deed Pro Rata Share of Costs • Easement Restrictive Covenants Verify. Content THANK YOU! Requested by: .,, Oct . 14, 1988 CITY OF RENTON TO: City of Renton OCT 2 6 1988 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 RECEIVED CITY CLERK'S OFFICE ATTN: Maxine E. Motor - City Clerk - RE: Jodi L. Thompson Rezone ' Rezone . 329 acres of property from R-2 , Low Density Residen- tial Use, to R-3 Medium- Density Residential Use. Property located at 1222 & 1224 Kirkland Avenue N.E. ECF-045-88; R-045 -88. Execution of RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS reflecting the follow- _ ing conditions : 1 . Not more than a total of six units shall be constructed on the subject site , which shall consist of the existing duplex, renovated or replaced by a new duplex on the westerly lot , and not more than four additional units to be constructed on the easterly lot. . 2. The applicant receive a lot line adjustment resulting in the westerly lot containing a total of 7, 133 square feet and the eastern lot containing a total . of 7 , 200 square feet . If the two individual lots are combined into one ( 1) legal lot , then this condition shall not be applicable 3. The development of any additional housing units on either lot shall be subject to Site Plan review. This condition shall apply whether the two (2) lots are combined , or remain separate as per condition 2. above . Legal . Description of property is as follows : Lot 1 , Block 11 Ga=re.=t--a Plat , Renton Highlands No . 2 according .."'"to plat recorded in Vol . 57 of plats pages 92-98, in King County, Washington; except the easterly 60 feet . Together with: East 60 feet of Lot 1 , Block 11 , Corrective Plat , Renton Highlands No . 2 , according to the plat recorded in Vol . 57 of plats , pages 92-98 inclusive , in King County , Washington . Together with an ease- ment for ingress , egress and utilities over the following descri- bed property: Beginning at the Northwest corner of the above de- scribed; thence south 40 feet ; thence west 40 feet ; thence north 40 feet ; thence east 40 feet to the true point of beginning . The above three (3) conditions are approved and acceptable as written. '\/Ov 1, A' 7D /2sa� BY: Jodi L. Thompson jj3 Date /0 /c:R6 /2cF2 • r / l I s STATE OF 1 f ss. County of /'4.5 g �q I On thiq � day of vC I ,A.D. 19&j before me,the undersigned,a Notary Public in and for the State of V✓ /,A1�Te,'v , duly commissioned and sworn personally appeared o to me known to be the individual who executed the foregoing instrument as attorney in fact of therein described, and acknowledged to me that __he signed and sealed the said instrument as such attorney in fact for said principal, freely and voluntarily, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that the power of attorney authorizing the execution of this instrument has not been revoked and that the said <' _4vai is now living. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year in this certificate first above written. 1 F I �i�flC.g f Notary Public in and for the State of ��-4 r I, reaidin , (Ackn(Acknowledgment by Attorney in Fact. TICOR TITLE INS RAENC owledgment Form L 30) September 26, 1988 Renton City Council Minute., Pane 277 Rezone: Figgins, An ordinance was read changing the.zoning classification of property located R-017-88 at 4444 NE Sunset Boulevard from B-1, business, with existing restrictive covenants, to B-1, business, with amended restrictive covenants for Floyd and Jean Figgins; File No. R-017-88. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. Rezone: Thompson, An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification for property located R-045-88 at 1222 and 1224 Kirkland Avenue NE from R-2, low density multifamily residential use, to R-3, medium density multifamily residential use, for Thompson; File No. R-045-88. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. Vouchers Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke presented a report recommending approval of Vouchers 55242-55550 in the amount of $944,896.78, having received departmental certification that merchandise/services have been received or rendered; Vouchers 55248-55250 machine voided. Hearing Examiner: Upon inquiry by Chairman Stredicke regarding the Council's authority in the Modification of absence of an appeal to modify a recommendation issued by the Hearing Recommendation by Examiner, Assistant Attorney Kellogg indicated that Council is at liberty to Council accept or not accept the recommendations of the Hearing Examiner, and make changes if desired. NEW BUSINESS Council President Keolker-Wheeler encouraged everyone to join the City of: "..,. Issaquah Salmon Days Issaquah in celebrating Salmon Days this coming Saturday and Sunday. ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL ADJOURN. CARRIED. Time: 7:45 p.m. MAXINE E. MOTOR, CMC, City Clerk Recorder: Marilyn Petersen 09/26/88 • • • • 1 WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT SEPTEMBER 26, 1988 ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following ordinance for second and final reading: Ordinance Amending Ordinance #4098 Rezoning Certain Properties from Light Industrial (L-1) to Business District (B-1) (E & H Properties, R-016-87) by Modifying a Condiition Thereto The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following ordinances for first reading: Clark/Kauzlarich/Boyden Rezone, R-013-88, from R-1 to B-1 located at 420, 508, 500, and 504 S. Tobin Street Figgins Rezone, R-017-88, from B-1 with Existing Restrictive Covenants to B-1 with Amended Restrictive Covenants Thompson Rezone, R-045-88, from R-2 to R-3 at 1222 and 1224 Kirkland Avenue NE to upgrade existing units and add two units on site APPROVAL OF VOUCHERS The Ways and Means Committee recommends approval of Vouchers No. 55242 through No. 55550 in the amount of $944,896.78; having received departmental certification that merchandise/services have been received or rendered; Vouchers No. 55248 through No. 55250 machine voided. Richard Stredicke, Chairman g 14/(-614.12-(A Nancy Mat s September 12, 1988 Renton City Council Minute: Page 257 Citizen Comment: Nisco - Nikki Nisco, 4200 NE 5th Street, Renton, submitted petitions containing 39 Closure of NE 5th Street signatures of residents urging closure of NE 5th Street one block east of Union Avenue NE to prohibit traffic generated from 380 new apartments units from traveling through the existing neighborhood. Ms. Nisco advised that purchase of her home was based upon promises by the developer that a small park was to be built across the street and the access road would remain a cul-de-sac. In addition to the 380-unit Windsor Apartment complex, another multifamily development is proposed to the south. She requested that to protect the safety of neighborhood children, NE 5th Street be barred to all through traffic except emergency vehicles.in a similar manner as Grant Street on Renton Hill was blocked when the Woodcliffe Apartments were constructed. MOVED BY REED, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL REFER THIS MATTER TO THE TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE AND ADMINISTRATION TO REPORT BACK. CARRIED. Councilman Stredicke asked that the report from the administration contain information regarding the proposed multifamily development referenced by Ms. Nisco. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the Consent Agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. Latecomer Agreement: City Clerk transmitted request for latecomer agreement from Gary A. Young, Polygon Corporation, the Polygon Corporation, to share in cost of installation of 12-inch water Sunpointe III main along Sunset Boulevard SW for Sunpointe III development, #W-969. Refer to Utilities Committee. Housing & Human Community Development Department/Housing and Human Resources Resources: 1989 Block Division submitted 1989 Housing and Human Resources Block Grant Program Grant Program for review and public hearing. Refer to Community Services Committee and set public hearing for 10/3/88. Claim: Thompson, Claim for damages in an undetermined amount filed by Norman Thompson, CL-42-88 13026 SE 102nd, Renton, for paint damage to vehicle caused by exploding spray can unsecured by City crews working at NE 12th Street and Sunset Boulevard NE (8/23/88). Refer to City Attorney and insurance service. Claim: Rogers, CL-43-88 Claim for damages in an undetermined amount filed by Richard and Lynette Rogers, 13515 SE 173rd Place, Renton, for vehicle damage allegedly caused when City truck backed into it at stop sign at Maplewood Golf Course (8/3/88). Refer to City Attorney and insurance service. Claim: Bainton, CL-44-88 Claim for damages in the amount of $298.62 filed by Irene Bainton, 2300 NE 9th, Renton, for flood damage to basement allegedly caused by sewage backup from blocked sewer lines (6/18/88). Refer to City Attorney and insurance service. Court Case: Gentry Court case filed on behalf of Beverly Gentry for alleged false arrest while picketing at Mark 'n Pak grocery store (8/3/88). (Claim for Damages #CL- 22-86.) Refer to City Attorney. Court Case: Vacca Court case filed on behalf of Nicholas A. Vacca for alleged wrongful demotion by Renton Fire Department from lieutenant to firefighter prior to approval of disability leave (9/9/82). Refer to City Attorney. Finance: Utility Finance Department requested utility collections agreement between City of Collections Agreement Renton and U.S. Bank. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Finance: Housing Finance Department requested approval of Housing Authority bond issue Authority Senior Citizen ordinance authorizing placement of $5.5 million bond issue for low income Housing Bond Issue senior housing units on November ballot. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. (See later action.) —Rezone: Thompson, Hearing Examiner recommended approval of rezone request for Jodi _13,A45-88 Thompson from R-2 to R-3 at 1222 and 1224 Kirkland Avenue NE to upgrade existing units and add two units on site. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Plat: Preliminary, Hearing Examiner recommended approval of preliminary plat for Douglas Prellwitz, PP-013-87 Prellwitz (Swanson Homes) for 12 single family lots at the 2300 block of NE 13th Place. Council concur. King County: Waste Planning Division requested authorization to execute contract with King Reduction/Recycling County for waste reduction/recycling matching grant program agreement. Funding Contract Refer to Ways and Means Committee. (See later action.) For:use By City Clerk's Office Only A. I . # AGENDA ITEM • RENTON CITY COUNCIL MEETING SUBMITTING Dept./Div./Bd./Comm. HEARING EXAMINER'S OFFICE For Agenda Of September 12, 1988 (Meeting Date) Staff Contact FRED J . KAUFMAN (Name) Agenda Status: SUBJECT: R-045-88 - JODI L. THOMPSON - 1222 and Consent 1224 Kirkland Ave. NE - Request to approve a Public Hearing Correspondence rezone from R-2 to R-3 for upgrading current Ordinance/Resolution units and adding two new units on the site. Old Business Exhibits: (Legal Descr. , Maps, Etc.)Attach New Business A. See yellow file. Study Session Other B. C. Approval : Legal Dept. Yes No_ N/A COUNCIL ACTION RECOMMENDED: Finance Dept. Yes No. N/A REFER TO WAYS ANDNEANS COMMITTEE Other Clearance FISCAL IMPACT: Amount Appropriation- Expenditure Required $ Budgeted $ Transfer Required $ L SUMMARY (Background information, prior action and effect of implementation) (Attach additional pages if necessary.) This proposal is recommended for appcval by the City Council subject to no more than six units on the site, a lot line adjustment on the westerly lot and additional units to be subject to Site Plan review. PARTIES OF RECORD/INTERESTED CITIZENS TO BE CONTACTED: see yellow file SUBMIT THIS COPY TO CITY CLERK BY NOON ON THURSDAY WITH DOCUMENTATION. %i CITY OF RENTON Na l HEARING EXAMINER Earl Clymer, Mayor Fred J. Kaufman September 8, 1988 Weldon Thompson 6820 51st South Seattle, Washington 98118 RE: Jodi L. Thompson File No. R-045-88 Dear Mr. Thompson: The Examiner' s Report and Recommendation regarding the referenced request has not been appealed within the time period established by ordinance. Therefore, this matter is being submitted to the City Clerk this date for transmittal to the City Council for review. You will receive notification of final approval, as well as a copy of the enacting ordinance, from the City Clerk upon adoption by the City Council. You will be notified of all action taken by the City Council upon approval of the request. Please feel free to contact this office if further assistance or information is required. Sincerely, FRED J. KAUFMAN Agrc • HEARING EXAMINER FJK:dk cc: 'City Clerk Building Division Planning Division 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2593 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )ss. County, of King ) DOTTY KLINGMAN being first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and states: 24th August That on the day of , 1988 affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this c'o-) day of 54 (1 c•, 1988 N tary lic in ilSnd fqr the State of Washington, residi a therein. Application, Petition, or Case #: R-045-88 - JODI L. THOMPSON (The minutes contain a list of the parties of record.) August 24, 1988 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION APPLICANT: JODI L. THOMPSON File No: R-045-88 LOCATION: 1222 and 1224 Kirkland Avenue N.E. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Request for approval of a non-project, programmatic rezone of .329 acres of property from R-2 to R-3 for future upgrade plans on the two units currently on this site and the possible addition of two new four-plex units to the site. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Planning Division Recommendation: Approval with conditions. PLANNING DIVISION REPORT: The Planning Division Report was received by the Examiner on August 9, 1988 PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Division Report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES The hearing was opened on August 16, 1988 at 9:35 A.M. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: • Exhibit #1 - Yellow File containing application, proof of posting and publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit #2 - Comprehensive Plan and Context. Exhibit #3 - Assessors Map Exhibit #4 - Site Plan The hearing opened with a presentation of the staff report by the Zoning Administrator, Don Erickson, who presented the following information on the proposal. The original application shows two lots on the eastern portion of the site, but it is not known if these lots are recorded with King County and considered legal lots. The applicant had been asked to provide information to clear up this point but to date staff has not received said information, and that request will be a condition of approval; staff looked at the application with possible grandfathering; the lot on the eastern portion is 5,678 sq. ft. with the lot to the west where the current duplex exists is 8,651 sq. ft.,(assuming there are two legal lots). Future plans may include upgrading of the current units on the site with the zoning request placing a higher density on the property; the surrounding area consists mostly of commercial uses, with other duplex structures located in close proximity; public utilities are available to the site. In his review of the rezone criteria, Mr. Erickson stated the request appears to be timely as the zoning was placed in this area in 1982 but there is nothing to indicate a specific rezone request for this property was sought at that time; the request meets the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan; schools and parks are in the area; open space will be protected should future development occur, and public utilities have been available to the site for a number of years. The additional housing would add approximately 2 students to the school district, 48 vehicle trips per day, and 16 to 20 additional residents. There have been many other duplex-type units developed in the area and Erickson noted this is not a clearly established multi-family zoned area. This site could accommodate 8 dwelling units with this rezone and the site, if evenly divided, would not meet the current minimum lot size of the R-3 zone • Jodi L. Thompson - R-045-88 August 24, 1988 Page 2 which is 7200 sq. ft.. Also, if future development is to be directed toward the eastern portion of the site, Mr. Erickson said it was staff's belief that that portion of the site should have a minimum size of 7200 sq. ft. which would raise the question of future development on the western portion as it would contain less than the minimum 7200 sq. ft.. Assuming the grandfathering provisions creating the existing plat would carry over, the applicant could then construct the 4-plex on any size lots. Considering the above information it was staff's recommendation that this proposal be recommended for approval by the Hearing Examiner, to the City Council, subject to the conditions that any future development on either property be submitted to the City for Site Plan review, and prior to the development or redevelopment of the site documents should be provided to show the date of segregation of the lots and their size to in some way ensure the grandfathering provision on minimum size lot is not carried forth. Lawrence Campbell, Architect. 1609 South Central. Suite A-1, Kent. 98032, representing the applicant, noted concurrence with the conditions set out by staff. He commented about the several existing duplexes in the area that were built in about 1943 and said it is felt this proposal will encourage the upgrading of some of the older housing in the area. The existing duplex will be either upgraded with new units added to the east half of the site, or the existing duplex would be removed and new units built on the whole site (considering the site as one entity instead of separate pieces of property). He said the request is a mirror image of what now exists to the north and west in terms of matching buildings; the property is now under one ownership even though it was purchased separately in two different time periods. The Examiner stated the City's concern is whether two legal lots have ever existed on the site and whether possible prior ownerships sold off the property without legally segregating the parcels. He suggested a title search. Mr. Campbell said the maximum units on the site would be 8, which would include the parking requirements also, and in no case will there be more than 8 units. He said the Site Plan review condition is acceptable. Also wishing to respond was Weldon Thompson, 6820 51st Street So:, Seattle, 98118, father of the applicant. Mr. Thompson stated this property was quit claim deeded to his daughter in 1982; originally he purchased the eastern 60 ft. of the property in 1974 with the western parcel purchased in 1977. Don Erickson suggested if single ownership is what is being dealt with at this time, and the applicant concurs, it may be easier to condition the rezone for a maximum of 6 dwelling units at this time. The other duplexes in the immediate area were again reviewed by Mr. Campbell. Mr. Campbell also requested that this rezone be conditioned upon approval of a Site Plan rather than a preconceived number of 6 units as he feels the plans should be studied by City departments first. Under the code they would be permitted to build 8 units, but whether or not they can achieve that number is not certain at this time. He would rather not be conditioned for only six units as this may impose an unfair economic condition on the applicant. He explained they intend to retain the present units to the west and put in a townhouse 4-plex to the east, and with the upgrading of the western building it would tie into the new building to the east - but does not feel there should be a limit on the number of buildings (up to 8) if in fact the property offers a better total development. He had no further comments. The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak, and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 10:10 A.M. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicant, Jodi L. Thompson, filed a request for approval of a reclassification of approximately .329 acres of property from R-2 (Duplex Residential) to R-3 (Medium Density Multiple Family). 2. The yellow file containing the staff report, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. 3. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the City's responsible official issued a Declaration of Non-Significance (DNS) for the subject proposal. 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. 5. There was no opposition from the public regarding the subject proposal. 6. The subject site is located at 1222 and 1224 Kirkland Avenue N.E. The site is located on the southeast corner of Kirkland and N.E. 13th Street. N.E. 13th runs no further east than the / • — Jodi L. Thompson R-045-88 August 24, 1988 Page 3 eastern boundary of the subject site. It dead-ends at that point and has been vacated west of Kirkland. It is only open for the stretch along the site's north property line. 7. The site is just off of Sunset Boulevard N.E. which is a major arterial. 8. The subject site is part of the original townsite of the City of Renton. The zoning was probably attached with the original adoption of zoning by Renton in 1953. 9. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of medium density multiple family uses, but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the Plan. The Comprehensive Plan was last updated in 1982. 10. A single duplex building is located on the site. The building contains two dwelling units. 11. The site is comprised of two separate lots. The western lot is approximately 8637.79 square feet, while the other, the eastern lot, is approximately 5679 square feet. 12. The zoning in the vicinity of the subject site is characterized as a mixture of residential and commercial districts. The subject site and property immediately south are zoned R-2. North of the site is additional R-2 property and R-3 property, the category requested by the applicant. 13. Immediately east of the site and abutting what would be the existing rear (east) property line is a B-1 (Business/Commercial) district which runs along Sunset at this location. The intersection of Sunset and 12th is a major commercial node along Sunset. 14. Across Kirkland is an R-2 parcel and south of that a B-1 commercial parcel. The public library is west of that B-1 parcel. Along the south side of 12th, just south of the subject site, is additional B-1 zoning along Sunset as it runs diagonally southwest. Kirkland intersects Sunset one block south of the subject site. 15. Additional scattered parcels of medium density development are located generally north and west of the subject site. 16. R-1 zoning (Single Family; Lot size - 7,200 sq. ft.) is also located in the area northwest of the site. 17. The R-3 zoning requested permits up to 25 units per acre. The subject site would, therefore, support up to 8 units on the .329 acre site. 18. The site and surrounding area was developed during the 1940's. The area consists almost predominantly of duplexes similar to the subject site. 19. The applicant's tentative proposal would be to maintain the duplex along Kirkland so that it would match the duplex development immediately across the street, and develop the eastern portion of the site as an R-3 development to reflect and mirror the development immediately to the north. The idea would be to have similar densities facing one another. 20. The site is essentially level with a slight topographical break along the east property line. 21. Hillcrest, McKnight and Hazen are the schools serving the site. Hazen High School is fartherest from the site being located at approximately 1.25 miles. 22. The site actually consists of two lots although staff could not confirm the legality of the subdivision. The western lot contains the existing duplex while the eastern lot is vacant. 23. Eight units on the site would generally produce approximately 2 students, approximately 48 vehicle trips per day and approximately 16 to 20 persons. The development of new units would be offset by the existing units. 24. Staff recommended that the applicant provide documentation regarding prior divisions of the site; that the site be developed subject to Site Plan approval to assure sensitive, compatible development; and that the lot lines be adjusted to accommodate legal development. The last condition would have the applicant re-divide the site so that the western lot would be just under the minimum 7,200 square foot limit, but with existing development which could be replaced. The resulting eastern lot would contain 7,200 square feet capable of containing a density of 4 units. • /, Jodi L. Thompson R-045-88 August 24, 1988 Page 4 25. Staff indicates that utilities and roads could serve the additional development without being burdened. CONCLUSIONS 1. The proponent of a rezone must demonstrate that the request is in the public interest, that it will not impair the public health, safety and welfare and in addition, complies with at least one of the criteria found in Section 4-3010, which provides in part that: a. The subject site has not been considered in a previous area-wide rezone or land use analysis; or b. The subject site is potentially designated for the new classification per the Comprehensive Plan; or c. There has been a material and substantial change in the area in which the subject site is located since the last rezoning of the property or area. The requested classification is warranted subject to conditions enumerated below. 2. The zoning on the site has not been reviewed since the adoption of the latest Comprehensive Plan in 1982 nor since the application of the original R-2 zoning in 1953. 3. The zoning requested, R-3, is compatible with the designation of the site for medium density multiple family uses in the Comprehensive Plan. 4. While changes to the immediate area have been slow, the site is quite close to Sunset (one block removed) which has undergone considerable changes in the last 25 years. Sunset is now a major arterial, and the node at Sunset and 12th immediately south of the site is developed with a wide variety of commercial uses. Immediately east is the rear of a shopping complex. 5. The additional six units which might be built will not adversely affect the underlying infrastructure. Water, sewer and storm sewers are all sufficient to serve the site. 6. Again, with two units existing, the increase of up to six units probably would not tax the roads although it might permit the encroachment of too much development. The site is not unlike other sites in the immediate vicinity and these generally offer relatively copious open space. Attempting to shoehorn in additional dwelling units in this area could introduce incompatibilities vis a vis densities, building types and uses fronting other uses. Therefore, staff's recommendation that not more than six units in total, the existing duplex, renovated or replaced by a new duplex, and four additional units, appears reasonable to maintain the openness of the area and compatibility between opposing units. 7. In conclusion, the proximity of the site to Sunset and 12th, the common lot line with a B-1 zone, the patterns of development on the immediate block and across both frontage roads justify reclassifying the site as requested. 8. The City Council should, therefore, reclassify the subject site from R-2 to R-3 subject to the limitation on density to a total of six units. • RECOMMENDATION The City Council should reclassify the subject site from R-2 to R-3 subject to the limitation on density to a total of six units, and subject to the execution of Restrictive Covenants reflecting the following conditions: 1. Not more than a total of six units shall be constructed on the subject site, which shall consist of the existing duplex, renovated or replaced by a new duplex on the westerly lot, and not more than four additional.units to be constructed on the easterly lot. 2. The applicant receive a lot line adjustment resulting in the westerly lot containing a total of 7,133 square feet and the eastern lot containing a total of 7,200 square feet. 3. The development of any additional housing units on either lot shall be subject to Site Plan review. / Jodi L. Thompson R-045-88 August 24, 1988 Page 5 ORDERED THIS 24th day of August, 1988. 4--3 FRED J. K MAN i/r4 HEARING E AMINER TRANSMITTED THIS 24th day of August, 1988 to the parties of record: Lawrence Campbell, Architect 1609 South Central, Suite A-1 Kent, Washington 98032 Weldon Thompson 6820 51st South Seattle, Washington 98118 TRANSMITTED THIS 24th day of August, 1988 to the following: Mayor Earl Clymer Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator Richard Houghton, Public Works Director Members, Renton Planning Commission Larry M. Springer, Planning Manager Glen Gordon, Fire Marshal Ronald Nelson, Building Director Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney John Adamson, Developmental Program Coordinator Gary Norris, Traffic Engineer Renton Record-Chronicle Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 P.M. September 7, 1988. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of $75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. • . . , • --- . .„. ...• ,.•.• . .-:.-•;• „.: . . . , .:., . . ,• . , :...:. .:•:1.• . ., . ,.... . . . :.:., ..,.. .,, ,,,, . • . ...... •,.. .... , ...., :• •:;,' .• :.::: , . . , ....:. : • ;, : '..::;:.; .4% . . • .• • .,•• ..,-, • . . ... . ••• . . .,. •!:. ,..... ... * - : .'•; ••,..• ..., . , • i p.,.,/' 1 7 . .-- .• '..... ---. . ::•:.•-:•.:.::...:.:::•...s! ..;;:::...?.,' .i:'•',"i•.;.:.i..t:i..iy.,.::::*:....:..i::: ::m....::i;:.:, .. ... an,-An'Aco ve.a-,C.,-/AN -°, • :/ N.C. a xt.smeer • •_____ .... --- •• 11-'1- . ..0.• ''g . .:. . • : ',. ."'"-f,'.''''"::Y:'"..!rs":!:.'......:''.2.0'..4:''..''''';';''''jw1594....'4'. • . RAI .....:_. --,7.------ •-- -- IP -,..7.1.,- .---- -.T—..,-._. ::- .",-., :,;......:.,--..•.- ••,.- ••-.-: •, .• ,. . • _ . I 0 I . • ' : : . • . .7A'14...i lik '' • ' ":''''.;...'...:-..".11e4"..r . - .., . . •O :..r.:::,; '. . \ ::', .,..E.4:::.,,i.,..1;.'k,7i:4,1;:tir File'',: • r.v ,.. *.!;*•? 1 ...."_!: • '' ; _•..... : ::.;:t.ir,•;Z. I 1-litipaff.4:44.-Wsl...44::•.,-iir. • :;...,.:,: '.. • .-%- , .:,:E-c'..;;i:gif.:;:i. li i:g li i* ':' :•.:..... . — TY!. . -IFe' 1114 .:•.: 1.1:.i . • '- :'...: --+-1 •-':''.'!". t.';1.: **0:4:t."4 rell. "`"''''' .:;i: '',...... • I OD ..:... ,:....; 51'...;: r • - . - ,- A :7!:.:::.,..7..,:nr.:7ni77.:,-;13:14 . . . -.:..p..,._:.....:::..z.:::;:::::-.:1 .• r•r,.1 •- • • .-•-• '..••••frAr. ;;, .'.,, 1-4. “• .• ..-:-.'i.f:;1:\:!;": •.::.::-: :t.;2.:‘;:i , .,i r • . 41._ . •. • ..,.---..-Jr-lAst-i', "'4a..*-a)'..);-/''''.,-;,•jr, . ...•... :,..i• • ,-. ?4,,,;;...i.,4,. .•,..;.•;41,-::: 1:• •,..„, , .....---,... --•,•-,,,,,,,,...., gr....,,. -•.-9,--,--....0,- i ', In 4114 :;': telt____ -- •--, .I • _::-.±—,-.4 u L ..; ".1S . -"( "."• 1 eot.‘„ • • • .,,,,...:,--- . ), ;,. .,. . ., . - "•:. .., . • .,...i .4-4. I I:: • ._ .... • • "i,:ti.i.:N, ' ' . .:.::' . . . ' i 11, • : '::'; *. • • . ,..‘ . _,41 ..:•., !: ,, . . . ....., .. :.,...: :..,..., :.,.... • . . ..... „, ____f_ . ,„ §., .,..,.: • • ...f.:: k,,: :.,... :,.I. ..,. ••,.... , ..sire PLAN JCALC:/...,[0. , , •C :f::; • 0e04771. NO (:SI/ADeD 4Ae4 DevywAret 3/PC Q.,/revemsreo ,d-zo,re., . . , . . . • JODI L. THOMPSON CP . . . R-045-88 , ECF-045-88• N . . . . . APPLICANT JODI L. THOMPSON TOTAL AREA _329 ACRES PRINCIPAL ACCESS KIRKLAND AVENUE N.E . . . • EXISTING ZONING R-2 , LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL USE EXISTING USE TWO DUPLEX UNITS PROPOSED USE ADD TWO NEW 4-FLEXES . • COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN . . ,COMMENTs LOCATED AT 1222 & 1224 KIRKLAND AVENUE N.E • . . • . . . . . .•. • • .. . ., . . . . . . . •, . „ - - . •• . • • . . v • • *I:•.* •.... ..... ..„ ....... ..., :. .. ..,:-..:. _ • /... ,:.,,:.......:.........,.: :•.•:.: ::.... ..............:-. ....,.. -:-...... ..: ..... -:f..:. ......„...: ::::::;•:. ...;,.... ,.. :..... ......,: ....,,... - ...:.?..... .:•i: : • t 7.......:. '. ..,‘..*.:' C.;•': .:c.:• .:.. • ...':. • ..:••••••-'. •t•: i ) lil c e .. t.•c : • • 0..! r ,.....3., .'AWN.•. : Alt ii . .::....‘... '...., • *r ii .o ...... -L. ;!:*: ..;:l.•. ”: .L. . _ . _ ...., •__ 4037P. ,:,„. . . . . • ..:,...,,..,......;.::............„,..:/,.......:.,.,,............::.,....,,:.„,,.,.......,:,:...„._::„....„,‘„..„...,...:.....,.......:;.......,, ,..„ .... ...... ... •.. (...' . .:..; 6 • 0 0 0 iR'-/dSt.o..00 VEZZ:-rec.)", • h -1:2Z._..4:c.:y-r P.'Sl'Ave 7' ::•I N.C. /3 rale•S7,4 e e r • ---- - ._ •• 0 . 0 • . .. -0 . , 2 ,.::: '.....::,I .4 ..: .......).•;;;;•L.,:-....,...r:i.1".'.::::::r.,•:.-',:'.-z1,'....:".....4...:::.il 1.••••;':•.,::•:':::,4l'..'"!..,v:t 5:*-.I'sit k‘,.;-:.:4.'i•ir:••:.'i,',::".•:ta:sz':•;,+.7';‘:'i''.'.'.:...:t 1;-.-....:01 +z.t.4.0..V.27'.41' i 4 -_ ... ',E ,Go.00•• 11, . .:.! .4.., _ _ ••• • t4toi, _......._:--.4-----...,- -......,_...,..„_ ..--.--z.----.7hr ..'• :-,-",:-f7--,•-:, •‘._ •%......_-I „ 1, •:. ....... '', '• --'' :':-(I ....•.-:......:........ ..*,'"---isinrscr.:.o...wrY.A..ir. .. ''''‘ ••:A I • ... I •- • • • 27...: ,. '.-..• ;::f.“'..„..:..., - '.1'.;-.-lt ::•.:' I:...; - ' I .--• ; : '1'.. •i.,: . . . Y.•e' •-•-- -: •:- • • — .,..1,, 4::.: ,,,,::., - 1 7._, ........, . 1 ::.• ,..'Z4.41'.0.1 . .. • :. .- •' - ."'-'•;7:4 '7'-::....1. .F.4 1 11 re Z::"!: ;•:.I.:.g • •• ' '' 'V;''' I-• -C4:.''./..-tT.:7 $. \ _. '-; •.......:. -.4 2 . • -/ 7.•;2.-1„.,6 .'1-• :•-- ?Ili r ... ,....... 1 .... ...:,...,... —4...x.t i....:,-.;:.,:;.'.'4: "7t1-,f,.i.f"Z. 7- . i.:::. :-..:;-.':, • . .. - x. ...,,---:,-.,;,--..--. =•-•f--..-,--,-.; r • - '.,..7-; " 4, •1-.. .-• ,.• 0 ' f v*i • .:t ••••:•-.•;!r._-_. ...,;..,--__Ii:,,,,,=,..,2_,-..,,,.-..,,,-.:-.:„.„.--,-.L• • •-•-• . . • . . . . . . •I. •--:-1.. •-•;--L-i--:•,;:t'i•-:-..;--/... il 1 0° .•:::::::::: - --• - • ‘-•:.-• ;-.-7-..e...i.•@:- TC,Vt_tri'l -':::;-::?--:t.:ESX:r2:•'i::::C-5;:- : il •-. -,...y ,,\ rir,"•-.;.•,,,,. 17=1"-,-,..:.... • . • • .....:•••: .......if, . • - . . •------e+FAL 7,- .,-.1. ..:-..7.----,7'1, 1 , . • ..,:...-.-r--...-kr • • --ii, -N - t.4e...,t1 -,,T• • •,....'..; I.:-,..:. : • ., . .. 13" Irr."; .7„. .. .....`• ; .4'.* !PIA '"'It:-i-717-:.;'la:"e`i. ,';'44••'•''.r -. .-- . •• • ,*jilt dill,.7111111F1 `...;•.: f‘4.-4..._ ... . • " m..:)P '•'-1r•.'- e•Z e ‘4 P 1 • . .:•.-.. - • ,e 7/.%/' 1 -W. -"' o — -,e' 4.--• - I. \ 1 1 . ..; !.•:-., ::-•,„1: . ..‘.'.....7,..,.,-----' :..,.....s., t. .,...411. ,::..., ......:: .-.-„.!, , t.-., .......,. , • e7"if • f"Z 30-'--• 4.;:: •.11;•.'i 'AAA,Ami 414111 '•....; •, .-:.• , ' -0... '-•• '::..i.91, .!•.:: *.**. , ..*;;;;•:; • _ ..,, •• ,... I. • :j•:::: . . ..r • • :::•-: i.,.. ..'i ._.. - ......:... t+; .,._•;'...;: $. ,-,-. ----- :.... 1 DA/veq....ty I :i ,st,', '..r.,.;.. • - • --, - _ _ ' • 5. : . ••. • r.--.:".; .c .:•:i: ':::::. IC j !:•:1. 5'/FE' PLAN SCA 22*: /%20' • W_OATI/- N •";..- L' :...:2' ;':•3 • NOTE : SHAPED AA'64 GICS/4'N/ITCJ' ..r/TC ofi A'C.9e./eS/r.e9 AC-2.04,6- '.*..'... ,..,.. '.•••':. 1.:**4 "i*:;,• , ., ....1:. ..., ::*:-... . ..:!.-.. . I . , .(....::; •..., • •• .!, o •, • ‘1••• c .it.,;.....s t •-.. :4., ef.;•••:':•1,. -% L: . \ .,,. ,,,;(4444::._ce,It:, ,,,,. • ,;'s..... •r? ,':• ••,•-:-• ',;•••:• •.:'• •:-,•-:...,:.•. '--•':'..-'r,'••••;".';:vi..::•;.:7„ ..':,-. , I,k•,': •• 41 '. '•;r."'...:, ,:••,'•,••••• :. •'•'. r.,-; ,:;:-.• ..(7.,,.:;.17 ril- ...",•,•,,i.,,..;17.'..%..,..s:.:•1-:"::..:4::.:•:...3'.::,,•"..; . . '• 4",';,t"...!:;•'-'' ., ..... •,, ., ..::5..:'::::'.Z':.c.-,...;.%::•,.;ff 1..,:.:,1':...:S.,',..,'-'.;f:::"„:A.. . ... •. •,••: if •...Z.. re,, ,:*....n.;,'...:.:".."••:.'•1,,E.,..,•..e: •,,' ,::•.C:;;;;:f...:•;:.:,V.F';76....:V. •':•ee. .....: ::"A. . ... ..... 7 -G ••-• , .'...:.....irCI;N'.:•:•••:....!:V,...,•,',.••,:: .- ''...c•e*".r",!....0..!•••SZ.S.; p.e:'f.l. •..Z...'0"..C.....,.1,•'crr4••:,'., Scale 1 y g IN NEI 4 -.....,..5...*.,,,...„.....,,,,...,-••• • ,„ lig IN;-;55'.:-,,,;:.. .....c., :.:::•,,,,,,-:-_,:, :-:;' .. ,-,::•••Fsf..;;•-•,:,•,.-;•,',':.:--..s.-: -::3,:s.. .,:::-..,..... . • 1115o . L ...5.,,..c., ...,. ..„. .,..•,. ,z...... .„.•• , -.e.c,.......,:i0.-..• ,....„ •-.0 ,. ......v.sc, •- ,74,4.•-‘ c,c,...-...,.......,.... ',A .:. al .. . ......„,,, ......,„ ....,•.e:: .., '41'2'''.",-..--CI''''''''73•/;,-.4.••* - .'''••,'.. ..•-. .,....• 4,,t,..„,,...........0........., 1111,-, ...• .......00. , .,.. 00 1111 ''.•, ...., ,..s-4.viA •...,:c!..,,,..-,-.--... •::C...',•:::•,•-••-f,,, MIN • " AT •4A::::::... : .. .)\. ,.. 11111.11. iiiiiii 1 • 1. k '',.:49 ••;i::.:.:::::::•... :•':•'....:•:'•;,k v... k . /44 .*01 ,_:;•::•::'::i.:f•: :•;:.:;..;.;.i ......;; •3.-'E'l'3. t.• ,,,,.0' finit::::.±.•.:.:;t,)`.c,:i:r;;:r v.1•:.:•:••;,(,,••.C'f r(:. -3'. T.e••••', I VA - :•1:;•:;•.: 1.../ '',11:1. -,•., . 111 0.14 ...:.......• ,i. ‘. •'''',I.t.::',`:':. • I% N ,,,;. . i , .c, „ ::••••:•. - .)3 ::-:•:::.:. ,,,,.. .,...„ =is- ••••.. 111111iMO ..71 --1. : ''' • •,,z• • .'' rigA, Oki III , •• minnow ::.:•:•:•••' tallow! • ' ---1 i•••A• . Immo ::,. wive • -7i ... • oir;4:).:-. 11111) • •0000. .'..: .. • ilow,s iti•••• milliill •", a0000 •.. , .,upir gg •11111•Ell F.I.H.wi .0. , • -1 l'.-0-0 0 0 ....---,•• --.•III leiii by,-.•••1 „, • il Ir'.4`)?4' •' lit 1,0 0 0 0.0,it.. :••.*i'...; i,.„,..,4. .•. Willi Una .o. .• • ,a, • •• IIII L .... .-__...... r•-_, • 1 :DARPA% -- ':! I tiliti:iiil:':•••*6-4M ...0°0°0°0°0°0°. ._ •., ._. .__ __._ • • -;... - * • • '•tty . III td ii:•.i i'.:.::40::.:.:.:.:::.:.::::*e.-..miip,Ili • "" " • • • • • •A.,•••_„•••1V3•_ ... .•-,4, MN • • • • • • 1;1,''',•r• 4 :c ::•.:•:•:.. 00000000. to. • • • • • • •' '• ••' :::•i•••::•::::::::•:•:.ra.1116.7.Z. *::::'ilig gi: '.•42‘,Allori••!.; 4 ,7 714 INS. 000000 •00000. .fr•'''-'' II • • • • • II • 'r, .. ' :•:•:•:•:• ...,:::•:•:•:f.•:.;alms MMMMMM 000000 ,4;..a; 0 0 0 000. • • • • • ••• '4.'s ..,;,_ I :.:•:•.•• ••:.--....Ili:pc'1 =II 1.2114 111I o • • • • • \• • • ,•,-,c:;;•,' ;:i::,:i:i:i:i to w "iittiiii-7,1 111- -- -- ..,.,•31?' • • • • • • IIA • • *. ;.•, .X:i:K:::tag 1111.1„51616. •*::.... 4,111.17,-V ilidiallai, 11. b • • • • • • • • ."• iiii.:i.:iliili:. • ... .•;:trt 4 rblini i.___ M • ° • . • • • • • • • • • • •?;. ::::::::::::::. 1. 0 •• • • • • • • • • ,. NI filLin 0 \; l...--s • • • • • • • • • • ::i•i*i:: • .-•-• -• • I • • • • • • • • ci.,. . ":::::::. li IIIIIIIN5.•••• re,e • • • • • • • • •• ,. .if::. ro 7---,--7.1---.-00 . •00...00.00 1. •.6.°•°. ••••••°•°.e. •''',,: '„ I AlIL lie . • • • • .__•• . .. .... ,,,k,... ...•No .•:.:::::::...... > • • • • • • • • • •:s . %II .0°..OP . il;. ...•.•.....•.....•.•. .4 ':•:::::::::.•:;•:::: ::•.:: ::.%ilk P.,01 • • • • • • • • • ., A • • • • • • • •' • I.,. %, • ..........ii.::::::::::....... ' •• • • ••••••••• .....„ ‘. :•.•..... ........... • • • • , „ •:::::•::::::.:• ...:•:•:•:•:•••:•:•:••.• ....... ..........,... .....„... •ii ..•It 11. .•.•.•••.• ',f!.:i\ w‘aligt It . IN `q\N ::***:„ , ----*--•• • • • • • ' , . 1111111 0 ..-.. MI ow \ , ,,,.,......„.,:.,......../III ... • • • • •1 ii %.0. • 1.01,pni*:Ill IP , ,1 AL .0• 1 1 $.:::::::,i. • ''Aikii:0011111 • • • • • P,Aii'' 41, ,•°,--;,-,„V :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::i*i:::::::: i •••••••• It •• iii.ii0_,...f2,;,:•.z.:,.:_,_••wall: qv. •ii.hla, :?..•:*;::.... eihn • II • . f ......00.... :::::::::::::.:.:.;.:::.:::.....::.:.:::::::::::::............:...........:::: .......4.1..MMMMM i?,.;;LIIIIIVELit Int.'si?) ''crir IN4*‘• ., .e....r A I.,...•••••• '.... . Ismilliiiiiiiiiii- ..1r---..sol ::.:......•••••••FA CHINE )o• .''''o•'-'•-•'-'7 -.isiii- r'""" 1") .,..,i),*‘',`, --' ‘.41....e.r.:77,i;T:ii:::•i7••••' ..r Hilt•••o•..000• i it 1 ::::::.:...timum .::::::•:*?.:;:•:- 11111111r11111 :)? 'q. NI. • V•o kg ;kw: y •:.:•:..:.:.:.:.:::::::::.:::.:....:,,....-• .•o 0• - ....=.... .o.opooci0000000000co, i i ::::::::::.,".---ZI. ......:::::::::*':*• ,4t' 4111114 0 ......... „my tt„oh,-:.. .:::.:::;R:::g.:iii::::.... ..,..,.::::iii :0:0°87.00.0.000.00....0.00.000.00.0.0000, • .. .7.1,.....i .:::: ::ill.::::::mi:: ....::::ii.:::mailii:. 44••1•111P 11110,.•. es, mis;mir g.,:tirili eiliiia ' ::::i::•:•.' ...:.::??:::.•&::: 0000 00 0 00 0.0000000000.00000000C 0::::;i:::::':::.:;• .\,......, :•:•.i::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::...,.... riplotte a" '144 4.4.:11, ": •. ...,:ig:gii:.:.:::2:•2 .vovito°00°100:.000°0000.°00.00°0°.. •••••••::.::i:::::.*:.*:...:•:•::::K:K:ft:Kg:::......:m:.::.::.••• . tfbkv.-' ter 1111113rniri iir•• ! ;,....,,, ,, .:...c, . •,....„ 1, L . .,00.00.0„0.0 , :„.....„...:,,:::::::::: ,., 7000.0.00.0000.0. ., .,.................... ,,,.., . 1 •0 •000 0,A :,,..... V ILIIII VIM A:relor Ash ,.....;,...5:„,•••:•'s •::::::::::::::::::::::*::if::::::::: 00.00.000•00000.0000 ,.......:.: .00 -. .,.. ...,4••••.401.. . ,. c70 •:i.:::.:::i:::.:::;x::.:mi •00.000000.0.0000000. ..:......,....... ''''''''''.... ...::: : :::::::::: : ::::::: :°07::::::::°0°5:00:0::0::::°0:00;ii:0::::::I,`........i:::.1.1.....°......:.:.: ..x.x.:.... '...r,,,...•:••• •••••• ••• .Doc.0 . ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: WM000000000000000• L..:.:•:::•:•........: p." r ., ir.,.... 44,,,,Er.,-• .,..) ,,/, di, .; lik intellik ..11 9INI NV• ,• . d. . •°°°<' I; :•••<-:••••:•:-...:•:•:•••••••:-:. •000000000.00.....00. .......................... 1 iii••••. ,,:, ,,,••••r.r. 110:Iniieg...fi.•?-i.ey •1.,,t.„.. .., ,..,. ,i,:....:.,i::::::,,,i,:,:,:,:::. 91 000000000 A• ..:.•.•.•:;............. •64 i'•74 0000.000. ...... .. Ik•111•1111111..fitk(72C,1`.. ,...3,4116i.:•:;"Pr.:4:,„.•&‘;,.• `', ("::3 •,•;''A :"' •••;i::**•••••::::.:1:1:**%•:%:'%.*:.:. •*,/‘:•' .•°00°00°0°00. ..4•' ....••••••••• .........• .. Ell 01.0.1.1111.41 ..°0.7 •••• •••• iir,,,:,:? i:i.:In . .::,:e:iiiii•::,ini: j:if.,:i:.•n .•0 0• .,r2.1.,i. ::::::::•::::::::u::. ,.;_3 11 ',"". C :•:•:•:•:•:•:•:,..:•:•:•:. • .r , .,,,,1-3. 011..."0".111 0 0 o,', --• ' '•.$"41111111111..'i% #4i . ::::::::::::::::::::::::: 'r3.Y..i'.0)1,'et•'•f, ..;:•.';-.4 .:-..:.......:.:.:.:.:.:.: !),,. op ....11....... .. MI IIINNVIINNIII . , •••••,..„, •••.4 _ , .,., .:::$1:1 . :.:•:::.:::::::::.:::::. ,. 'Pp,.I,,..'.,:.V.../*,;,1:6-j.!!„-,., :.................:.:....... 1.11 eisemsrv:;" -,• A.,.,- - gutk;',1;:,,;zu.-,;..-, .s.14' Yr?•••••••: :-..',..:'•'";..:.C.•).44;i4., .,.1-1,;:f?';- ''i,.?:;',.f.;),2'.:/* :::.:::::::.:::.:::::::::: :: iii. '..).. ). Mit __ .•_.• 111111:11:1yi 35..••',.‘;.s .c:.'sTit,,,,,,,.,,:.- .!`:,''?4,-....4.:?f,;.,.-.,,i;•;(!:.,.;:;,..,..,_fi,:g f,•,•,i->;,,,•:,9,4:•?-,:.,:s: 2:.,..,',?,,,,,..:i.,- ••::::::::::•.::•::::::::::::::. e,. nil.011!,41101111 i.:••:•..‹..L; Yr,' ;r:e.,4,4\.:(C.) Ilk,4.'t-:-:„.0'ii •f.!-;?;!fq.,.,C.')'.'2;;‘.1:9 r-s4::-,.;:!:::;:".9.9:r:r ri rp:',(-. '.'.•••:•:•:::•::: 1111101.- 'k• 0.4. Ws.4-"II!!! ;,2:0;•(,).•••.:.:-Iskvii,44.9.6,, Imi•,.. :',61..!',,I.-:a.i.:,:-Je7,:t5is,`P.,ri ' •' "••=•*'D•scn't ''0..4 iej,..,.:• .". fjita,..,•;,,I.., .. 9!•i3' ' 41111100. ....r...,,..o.r4 (• •NNININ1b. d. -..., •,p.. '.Ct'oC5?i',;,c.., A.-.'',:sci,.,,P •911.11. kb/..,.(3- ., ..A:V;'t•• 7,,s ..b-u`.4c).ei• • ..:1 0,to g. • •.-ri • ,...,.:,•••): :., , --.0. • • .,.,,., • ,-. •41 Ve....ef5;qr.31,. ' "n:.f•';'. ';',. ....119!•''- ••• MMil ..,- :4•NIIIPI4P •.''..17. ".(..)C‘(Pe 1 .. . ." "' ..-'' •::::i Pa. ,t?,.5',.. IN )4,',... : • ••10.7.- 1J,.e.q`.'i•,... b0k.. rIci,. r‘,..,.:•t:..-ii-r...4ii. ...i.,..„..:Y.:.,,,,,•ir,...,,,,...e..,-,..- •(":,-, :..-', ..s-zi., .... '. p 174'.'"'•-•r,' • 'M;.. II ." 0, •I'r' l''.1,• .. ),. „n, , IV% --• ..;,';',1:'••t*,co..•-:`,. ., ••, •..-.'el;IP t,;.11'6.: 14;441- 4-'0411.4!',1,0,.....SPA..-.cr_ter.-..1"),•IT'•-•w. Off,, ••••••&41 •,. •ill:q„.t),.,?•,':,.1?...il ...q.'o 't.01,1".••r4i.s •l•-••- • c•-e'N'. ' '-' 1411:', Ilk . ''''.0: `1M;ell.i.? 11•‘ft.,'Lib 00.•': q••• ,„9.15141,... -'il.. .e'r•• ••eV( :.•006.-r:0 ;,,.• , . VI ______ -;*.cr.:- • ,,,._. .._ me-, ,. •r•• !-..,....-.. .1 .,,Nrsizi•44kkl 4131111011 / • ..ds ,. . „3„..• v.-,„, , u ...;. •000: ,7 LAND USE ELEMENT. •,,,,.,•„,. „ ..,,,T,,,,s,,i. ,,. c . ..„:„52,••••.,,,•<,,,•,,,, . , .P.1.' •,..k... 1:• 0:r.1?,:(A 11'''• , )• '.•,5',,,,., '',01,r' ,.‘.;,".;Iv ii,V:0 no,:,ol ' i ::::::::•:.....' ..0 6,5. • , .......,,,*....1::.:. . q,..:,...:.,re,-.....,-.•:. . !h, • ..::.:.:.*:.::.:::.:.:.:.::.. .,. ,c°v.',.,'.:;.!,•,t',:g.-;•,,....4,:•%;.:.z.,.0.., ...fg'..,.,01.-0 ..0... ';', I ti- . .:::?.:.i..iiiii:K:i::iiii:Iiiii::Iwor.•?,,,;,,,.,....1,..,.......••, 0.000... NI . . . .. so i Commercial ..,-.....,,,,, .000.. Single Family .mii:ii:iiiiii:if:*i*:•*::: ,... „.••,-;:3•- vc.,:.•-•0: .-0.0. ...: .8,00.04 . s . ,. „,„,,,,,,,,,,,,„,:,::::::::::•:::•:.:.:.„ ,...4.,. • „„,;4),. . • .. .. .... ... i• . sr- • :,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.1..„-z,,,,:,:i.,;',:;Y:0:', .•-,.':..z.',:=.''".",,.-.•1 i:.::::::ii:iiii.::ii Low Density - Office / Office Park 1 N1144%...:1. .!.. !,:::::!. ::-:•:::..:••.*:...::: : Multi-Family 1 . „.:::.•.,-. ..00...0.00.0.0.0; ..... a. ...e:::.: "!•.••,.: t. ,.;.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.,1 Medium Density .0..0.00000. .v, i 0. ::•::•::if::•::•:::.. ,:;.4 0000. .,,,,,,,,,,...,,,, \t\\, Nig,..0000000o• •"••••••••••• Multi-Family•J .0.0.0.000.0.00, Public/Quasi-Public as. 0°0°0 ---...*::'"x.:':'::.• - witi:i:*i:ifs3::Y:::: • Light Industrial - %) .., ,... ,., '::: 01...:::ii..:. .. I High Density .........."._.... .„.:,. .. NNW ,...., • --- ::::•if::::•ononon.°0°.°0 ',A . '''''''''''''A'" Multi-Family • 1 •••.•, r:,•,-..,.,:. 1-,i, ::i::iiiii.00.0000.000.0 .• .., ,, -CCP 6 . .000ocoov000. •-,..0...,Is, , „r •000000. 'A rSo. I • • • • "V:, U • :"•ec-C•7.,cf .', .:, ......... •'.•,? ' .64'. Recreation ", ..0000.0.00.0o 4••••el Heavy Industrial ''' , .•••...0 lig • • • ., .,? • . 6. •,....,„ ., ,.., ' - •'4 I • . . .. .m., . i ,'5?4, • c'•. '11..if,',.nt,fi• n Ma ufacturing Parka c., ./.• . ,?••.<1., .'f.,•••4 g,f;z•••'''••• Greenbelt . -_-__-__-___ ____ ____ ____ • re, ."e.9.w A,r • ?qe'E,-of • __ i•••• . . .. .11k, ••73 • i ...„3,..:,.. . / Multiple Option II ',. 1 t\ •.'N'':,,,,,,A,N.--\- ... .. Co CITY OF RENTON POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor MEMORANDUM cze,. „..ro 0, -\-z O August 15, 1988 Qj�'�H��fG TO: Fred Kaufman Hearing Examiner FROM: Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: Thompson Rezone (R-045-88) The above-referenced application is scheduled for public hearing before the Hearing Examiner on August 16, 1988. The Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner was submitted on August 9, 1988. Since that time, staff has obtained additional information concerning this application which necessitates modifications to the project description and an additional condition included as part of the staff's recommendation of approval of the rezone. Staff believe that the amended materials improve the accuracy of the report and justify the revised Departmental Recommendation. However, these changes are not believed by staff to result in. any significant change to the application, such that a new review would be required or that the scheduled public hearing should be postponed. These items are detailed below in this memorandum. 1. Section A should state: Applicant seeks to obtain a non-project, programmatic rezone of .329 acres of property from R-2, Low Density Residential Use, to R-3, Medium Density Residential Use. Property is currently developed with a duplex; future plans may include the upgrading of these units and the addition of up to two new four-plexes to this site. 2 . Section B(8) of the Preliminary report should state:. the western section of the property is developed with a duplex; the eastern section of;.the property is vacant. • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2552 Memo re Thompson Rezone August 15, 1988 Page Two 3 . Section G(1) , paragraph 2 , should state: This property is presently partially developed, with the western section of the site developed with one duplex. There are future plans for upgrading the existing units and for the construction of a maximum of two four- plexes on the subject property. 4. A new paragraph should be added to Section G(5) , to state as follows: Additionally, staff notes that the subject property consists of two lots, one of 8, 644 square feet and one of 5, 678 square feet. A utilities/access easement of 1600 square feet also exists along a portion of the northern property line. If these lots have been legally platted then under City regulations each of the lots could be developed with a four-plex. Staff recommends that, in conjunction with future site development, the applicant be required to modify the lot boundaries of each parcel to provide a 7200 square foot lot on the eastern portion of the property and of 7133 square feet on the western portion of the property. Furthermore, development on those lots should be restricted to a density of two units on the smaller lot and four units on the larger lot. These limitations are recommended to ensure conformance with other development in the neighborhood. 6. A second Departmental Recommendation should be added to state: That prior to upgrading the existing development or prior to any new development/redevelopment proposal, the applicant shall be required to provide documentation as to the date and method of property segregation of the existing Lot 1, Block 11 corrected plat, Renton Highlands No. 2, and shall be required to apportion the lots so that the eastern parcel is 7,200 square feet in size and the western parcel is 7, 133 square feet in size. The larger lot shall be permitted to be developed with no more than four units; the smaller lot shall be permitted to be developed with a maximum of two units. Note: The application for the reconfiguration of the lots may be submitted at the same time the applicant requests site plan review. If you have questions or need further information, please contact me. Thank you. DKE:lwb:adk CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA COMMENCING AT 9:00 A.M., August 16th, 1988 COUNCIL CHAMBERS, SECOND FLOOR, RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING The applications listed are in order of application number only and not necessarily the order in which they will be heard. Items will be called for hearing at the discretion of the Hearing Examiner. First City Developments Corporation Application for short plat approval to subdivide approximately 17. 6 acres of property zoned 0-P, Office Park, into four (4) lots. Subject property is known as Phases IV and V of the Black River Corporate Park. Located east of Oakesdale Ave. S.W. and south of S.W. 7th Street. ShP1-016- 88 Jodi L. Thompson Rezone Rezone . 329 acres of property from R-2, Low Density Residential Use, to R-3 Medium Density Residential Use. Property located at 1222 &1224 Kirkland Avenue N.E. ECF- 045-88 ; R-045-88. BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING August 16, 1988 APPLICANT: Jodi L. Thompson FILE NUMBER: ECF-045-88 ; R-045-88 LOCATION: 1222 & 1224 Kirkland Ave. N.E. A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: Applicant seeks to obtain a non-project, programmatic rezone of . 329 acres of property from R-2 , Low Density Residential Use, to R- 3 , Medium Density Residential Use. Property is currently developed with two duplex units; future plans include the upgrading of these units and the addition of two new four-plexes to this site. B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record: Jodi L. Thompson 2 . Applicant: Jodi L. Thompson 3 . Existing Zoning: R-2 , Low Density Multi-Family Residential 4 . Existing Zoning in the Area: R-2, Low Density Residential; R- 3 , Medium Density Residential; B- 1, Commercial. 5. Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Medium Density Residential Use 6 . Size of Property: . 329 acres 7 . Access: Kirkland Avenue N.E. serves property at 1222 Kirkland Avenue N.E. and 1224 Kirkland Avenue N.E. ; N.E. 13th Street serves 1224 Kirkland Avenue N.E. 8 . Land Use: Each of the two properties is developed with one duplex unit. 9 . Neighborhood Characteristics: North: Property is primarily zoned for low density residential use; there is also some property zoned for medium density residential use. These properties are typically fully developed. East: Property is zoned for and developed with commercial uses. South: Property is zoned for R- 2, Low Density Residential Use and B-1, Commercial Use. The majority of properties are developed; there is a limited amount of vacant property. PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER August 16, 1988 Jodi L. Thompson Rezone - Page 2 West: Property is zoned for and generally developed with low density and medium density housing. There is some vacant property. C. HISTORICAL/BACKGROUND: Action File Ordinance Date The subject property is part of the original township of the City of Renton. D. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1. Utilities a. Water: The property is served by a ten (10) inch water line along Kirkland Avenue N.E. and ,a six (6) inch water line along N.E. 13th Street. b. Sewer: The property is served by eight (8) inch lines along both Kirkland Avenue N.E. and N.E. 13th Street. c. Storm Water Drainage: The property is served by twelve (12) inch pipelines along Kirkland Ave. N.E. 2 . Fire Protection: Provided by the City of Renton as per ordinance requirements. 3 . Transit: METRO line #111 serves the property via Kirkland Avenue N.E. 4 . Schools: a. Elementary Schools: Hillcrest Elementary is located approximately 0. 50 miles from the subject site. b. Middle Schools: McKnight Middle School is approximately 0. 50 miles from the subject site. c. High Schools: Hazen High School is located approximately 1. 25 miles from the subject site. 5. Recreation: North Highlands Park is approximately one-quarter mile from the subject property. Kiwanis Park is approximately two-thirds of a mile from the site. E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1. Section 4-708, R-2, Low Density Residential Use. 2 . Section 4-709A R-3 , Medium Density Residential Use 3 . Section. 4-3014 (C) Change of Zone Classification (Rezone) F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT: 1. Comprehensive Plan Compendium, March 1986, General Policies - Residential Element, pp. 14-15. 2 . Comprehensive Plan Compendium, March 1986, Area Specific . Policies - Northeast Renton, pp. 55-61. PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER August 16, 1988 Jodi L. Thompson Rezone Page 3 G. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1. The applicant, Jodi L. Thompson, seeks approval for a non- project, programmatic rezone of a parcel of property approximately . 329 acres, from R-2, Low Density Residential to R-3 , Medium Density Residential. , This property is presently partially developed, with each of the two sites hosting one duplex. There are future plans for upgrading of the existing units and for construction of one new four-plex on each of the sites. 2 . Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43 . 21 (C) , 1971, as amended) the Environmental Review Committee, the responsible official, issued a Determination of Non-Significance on July 18, 1988. 3 . Section 4-3014 (C, 1) lists three criteria that the Hearing Examiner is asked to consider along with all other relevant information in making a decision on a rezone application. a. That substantial evidence was presented demonstrating the subject reclassification appears not to have been specifically considered at the time of the last area land use analysis and area zoning. The subject property was part of the original township of the City of Renton. It was developed with the now existing low- density residential uses in approximately 1940. The property was designated for Medium Density Residential Use in the Comprehensive Plan which was adopted in 1982 . However, no changes were made in land use zoning in the area at that time. There is no information which indicates that the subject property has been specifically evaluated in conjunction with any areal land use analysis since that time. The Long-Range Planning Division has indicated that the Comprehensive Plan designation currently in place continues to be valid. The evidence, indicates that the application for rezone,. therefore, conforms to the Comprehensive Plan and that the subject property is appropriate for rezoning to uses shown on the Land Use Map. b. That the property is potentially classified for the proposed zone being requested pursuant to the policies set forth in the Comprehensive Plan and conditions have been met which would indicate the change is appropriate. The subject property has been extremely stable with respect to zoning, development and use since its original incorporation into the City of Renton. Land use action has been confined to construction and maintenance of the residential units now existing on the property. In general, there has been increased and diverse development in the area. Development within two miles of the site includes multi-family residential uses, commercial uses, office uses and public uses. The Comprehensive Plan indicates that this trend is anticipated to continue and to intensify -- the . Northeast Section of Renton, in which the site is located, is experiencing a greater level of growth than any other section of the City. PRELIMINARY REPORT TO ' HEARING EXAMINER August 16, 1988 Jodi L. Thompson Rezone Page 4 Public utilities, street improvements and public services are adequate to serve the site and other developments presently located in the area. These amenities can be improved upon to accommodate future developments on the subject property and in the vicinity. c. That since the last previous land use analysis of the area zoning of the subject property, authorized public , improvements, permitted private development or other circumstances affecting the subject property have undergone significant and material change. ' Reclassification of the subject property to conform to the Comprehensive Plan designation would be consistent with the City's present development goals, and current, as well as likely future, development trends. While the present application is for a non-project, programmatic rezone, the proposed reclassification would allow implementation of a tentative plan for future development of additional multi-family residential uses on this site, to serve the growing number of persons interested in housing in the Northeast Section of Renton. Generally, existing public utilities and services (e.g. electricity, telephones, fire service, police service, water mains, sewer lines, storm drainage systems, schools and recreational developments) are adequate to serve this site and the local community. The rezone action will not effect any utilities or services. With future development, the applicant can and may be required to implement specific mitigation measures tied to a specific proposal, and to improve utilities and services, as appropriate, to any proposed development. 4 . The final test to determine whether a rezone is appropriate is to address the question of timeliness. Is it appropriate to rezone the subject property at this time? The subject property is located in an area which generally includes a mix of uses. Multi-family housing is the predominant use. The area also includes single-family residences, commercial uses. Offices and public uses are located within two miles of the site. There are some tracts of land zoned for residential use which are not presently developed, however, the majority of residential properties are developed. The Comprehensive Plan designates this property for Medium Density residential use. A rezone would permit development at a level of density which is consistent with the type and level of neighborhood development which is now present and which is anticipated to occur. 5. Representatives of City departments have been generally accepting of the application to rezone. The Public Works Department, Long-Range Planning, and Fire Prevention Bureau have recommended that the applicants enter into agreements with the City, at the time of future development, to participate in improvements to utilities, roadways and public services, as deemed appropriate by the City, in order to ensure adequate services to the site and the surrounding community. Long-Range Planning and Parks and Recreation have also suggested that future development be subject to design review to ensure compatibility with the residential character of the local community. PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER August 16, 1988 Jodi L. Thompson Rezone Page 5 H. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION: Based upon the above analysis, it is recommended that the Hearing Examiner recommend to the City Council the approval of the rezone to R-3, Medium Density Residential Zone, file 045-88, with the following conditions: 1. That any future development on either property be submitted to the City for site plan review. Note: Typically any use in the R-2 or R-3 zone is required to go through site plan review pursuant to Section 4-738 of the City's Building Regulations unless it is SEPA exempt. It is conceivable that the development of two four-plexes at different times on different lots would be exempt from SEPA and therefore, site plan review. • :::// , .., • • • •-:LIN./AWL,VPD ICCT/av _ 9' O •O { ___O = µ N.f. /S •STACIT . �.: .._. ..._ • • • I0 a It, _,„.....•..,........r. 1 ...., -, ............':f ;:.. 7 7 7:.:... .4::::';'z.:qn1". ,):!.... • �'. -•" fit;.:1a^,,,}?;:1'" '1� •� I _.__. • _ — - iK0 .u�.SLi:xuc1....Yk'.aL:1! ._. '}im • • • .. ,- tat^•^``.':_, , —�.a/_.c . 1�', • i in . . •:•;!: . 1 I i1~tVt6'Y•4••••�ili'' 1�� w. 1 YL .f'w�,i i'A ♦1 .41 ; . Y,-r //,'/ . eo' Ja.'_ • • / • 1 r • �}•�,.. OA/vf WAy 1 • �r 2 ' 'Sire PLAN� r� � JCAL f:/'•20'_ k A'OATH sig., NOTE:SHADED AAC.f DES/4'NATff sire of RCQQESTfD A'EZO,Y CP JODI L. THOMPSON R-045-88 , ECF-045-88 • • N •. . , . . . , ' APPLICANT JODI L. THOMPSON . TOTAL AREA .329 ACRES PRINCIPAL ACCESS KIRKLAND AVENUE N.E. EXISTING ZONING R-2 , LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL' USE EXISTING USE TWO DUPLEX UNITS PROPOSED USE ADD TWO NEW 4-PLEXES COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN COMMENTS LOCATED AT 1222 & 1224 KIRKLAND AVENUE N.E • r ' ,J.:: ._. 0 I--- • '4- '':,;....,-.. ..4.„‘ '-•. '' ' ct :1., ••, AI •- ••, Fe..ii;:::&:. .' • .. ,,,,:..... ... .. ., . _ . ... • :•:1..c.c,...,•,•,.7.1:,...,..,....:::::.1......„/.1:-., .. \ . . . . .. ..„..,:.,.?.,-;,;.„, O•..::. ••-::.i•-",,- .:4.i .,. .. •••••• - --.•••-• : •••;••••:?.. -4- •if*,:,....„-;;i._.•....•-,.-...•:•c:4,"•1•1:-:,-,... - ( 4 :' r'.• ' .,:::2‘4;.:'..7...%.6V.fr C.:''. , t, . 7.-:•::•Ei.....i'.-.,::::r.:..7•.,..-,-;._ ....::9;, ..„5,...;.5.....g.,1:r...e., . ,:.:.:-.....r.•:.%•7,, ..:•,:,c• ••••• 4•:.;•P'P..:"',.;,ec.` ,..',I.?.V•..V g',.:.., ,•-.1 ,,c.F;•••;•:5,..‘...:;•••••••...e;', "-..,,,:-••••,,...e:'A •C....0C% . , . 5 Y Scale 1 .,, , . ,. ,. 1 I •'''c'•-••••'•,;."tr„;•.-„..,,,-;:14 r.... • ::;..... .... '1131151t L-- ''7•5'..j. 57.0‘...r...;.....'i :'•';*i• .0c;::':-::j-::•. .,.4 ;1`:;:,.: .7....7i3' . iillii 1 1.8 .c!*:'-'"(b."....'Zi'V•Y:!:,,i::, ..i'";•.'. ,:',,-•?...;:!:;;,:--%,.''..:-.::: ..,7,:-.:.6.:1'.,.0,:.,`",/.1,' 1;;;:•••?,.%; 1..?,'•°;=:),.;:,?..;...7?:::::,1/4„.., , _ , . • .'°...:7,f-i,'..^:S,,'•E--.. ri:"r6't•-•''''..c• 0-,• .9'•-NI ;\ • ;1,c-• , • - - •• . „..7...7,,•-....ty,.,.. ,,,:,.. 411..c.,.., .. - .,,•,,j ... t• '::•••:•,."1:...1...f. h.,..ftS.% WNW&I •%, •1411.4,„ 400111•N .... ,. turip00000000• w- ... —rr .. itkto.$, • I ....,...q.„. i_., s.,.• , $4:,.....,.. •,..,•,.G.r-•*.-- --- %\ •:::*.,-?.:$ (,•'„,...,...„.../..r. Ili .,. cil,„..„. ....,...„z.Y" -4 Wli•:,:„ ..4.: 0:-;1_1;•,... .:, . ,VSV:if..• .: :'...'f.t.A 1 1 Vit,f0 ...:::i::.:•:.i.:::*:•:-:•:-. .-.1:::, --th ....it b . . ,... ..s.:.:::., _ -,),:, ,•,:, .. /... , •••,) ' 1..°0%.OA::.:•:.:. ..' ••• ' L""..;.• ,.. 44......• i, N. ••••.'• - 111 Air 1 • v,4r, . . . ..--!: ...:„ ,N ::::. — ,; dl. ;. i::::::::::::. . . ..119,.... ..;d1 igrig;t••7:.-- --‘,?..1;•,..ti.; . , .,,,• , ri.,...„ ... ' vA• .*:::. 1 1•••Ft, .. .:— 0 • c: ., - •i^•;••••• visl _pi-,. ••• .000. -... •. .. itsw.. igiN•ss, • I, •^- ' - • ^-1••--: lint . •-.) c,0000 ••• • :: ;,-,JP IN CitlinlE1 d PIILIILIA.1 .°. . *•13214.0y1„,.... MC ':.... I oc'oeciPok""•f7::••:,,•:c I "4 141: I Illiiiiillph,"_..d7S8Mag . 0 ,,.. • ./.- [....,..,3, 11111, ii.r..6 •.::•,,,:::::: .1-z•:. •" • • CP, • . •. !MIMI . •• • • e ir- -‘ir '•c- 111F.:ii.:i ••aa...•17,:i I - "..-:::::i:i.:.. .- ..0.:.-100.•• - ,,...,,..,. a • • • • • .*-"No ...., • li . .0.°0.°7°0830°°0°°10°: r:'' • • • • • • * .•(..• ' :-:-:-... - ::i:i..x..:.:•::::i::::r, Agoras,. 1,•4.... • • • • • • •' '• :.:iiii:::%::::::iglIviiia •• :.:::.:i::i.:1:::.lilu:Itni; ars , 711/5, di din 00.0.0 •000.0. •iy,;a.), , • • • • • • • :-•-. . :::::::::: _twilit '::::i:X:i:i::earmar,a•rei 000000 • • • • • • • '-` ii:iiii:ii ,ffia,ININI I ...i:v..Mtal Viiiiill *El\VA Elms •copc.00. 00000c, ,,,,•:p ..., ."'t.' 11 • • • • • \• • .0 „- (;i: ::::•.?: ,.. .....„,_"1.1111[ .::i.. I AIII/(di ill!iallb f.. 11- • is • • • • o\s• • .. . /.:::::.:::::::../ . ••.i:.. me v •..,0.+ 1 • • • • • • a :• ::::::::::::::::. . '''''''' •itii: .1 . . . • • • • • • • i;D • • •,.. iiii:::i::iiii: 1, Aiummer1/4:94. "1" i 1....../ I •• • • • • • • • • f .......:•:•:.: ....% 1 • •• • • • • • • • • ' • .::M DAV iiihin,N • .——. -• • • I • • • • • • • • i•,. %:,,,, I :.:•:. —IN-..Q.1,2,1,!;) 111 . w D. .0.0.0. .0.• •••••• ;1;:.•, :Ir.' 7-c-•-•1--el MIL . .., :00°00.000.00.000„*„00.0.0.1 • • .. • • • • • • •• • , ...,.. . .0000... 0 . I . • • • ILO ' • ••••11 ,'•fe,,'•• 0 1111 •:•:::::::•:•.• <1> • • • • • • • • • •-• ..„ :000... soll r.. • • • • • • • • e,, .x.•-• 00.Ens% Aae . . ••••••:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•. . r.i • • • • • • •I • "1,, •00 W• • ..... "••••••'..... .. .......:;:§4kAti to et ...mix • • • le • .... ‘ a .I ........:.:.:• ...... ::.::::.:, ....,..,• r••• •1 • . . . •••• ••••• .?,. • ,• • • • • • .• ......, ‘ . pp •e: ' ' .... .. A ‘II Ili 11.. :.: :.1111.11=1114A111111 ; p....:411:1110.761:12%i:::.: • _ %:•:•:),...4.„.••••••.:•:•,,,,..di: • • • 11 • '.,. . ORM=' w I :iiiMii!:ii:i1011• • • • • \• :: , ,,, lidill .-. N. °0'• 'tala. ''•••'''.:k- • 'filiininiiiill ,..• • • • jib. v43 ii -----ii ....., • :::,:::::::::::::•::::::::,;mu •,,Aw. •elt VP Ar ii 1'1 .... .... • em.---.01•307•4 mill% • to •1• • • • . • if 41 " I 1 &Midi: ...:::.::::::.:„.., .....„....a, " -• ,...........„ :„..:,,, ,,,r--.,., .„;,..;;:::::.::::;.•*'*':' Po ill-.--''2".--"4411;1; r ...i .:: All ;i:'114..'.•?%...;::::::11:: :•:.:: :•-••• ..•0: RHO' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OCOV I Or". i :::::::::,...-,,... ......::::::::::::::::::::::::::51V IMP SI 74,"iiIIIIIIiim•: lit''.... NW tp 4,„„,„,,, •:. ::,:,,,:,,,:,:,:„„,:,„ ...:::::.: ..00000.0.00.00...000,00....0.000: . ,,,,,..., __, .:::::::::::,:::::::::„.„,:,:5„,,,,,,,,::::::::::::::::::: •„0g.1 .10. gli, el, g*;,, 4,.;:•gii... .; ••:::::::::::::•:••• ..:.a..:::::. ..3,::,c,c,000.0.0000..0.0,000000000,000,0,, :•:::,...:•:•:,:,..,:: •N A:::::::::::::::icg.:111•:.ii.::::EN..-::1-:::::::• tilis,:-• vsz• a i."'V • .ii SMINA I. .: ::... ...::::ili.:.:1:1:::*:::::.* V 0°0°0°0 0 0 0 0•0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 VI ii .4er ...s.. ••:•z:•:•:•Kw • ...:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:••.•:•:•: •000000000•00000000 • ,ocl ..?°: I rirlopille (:),....., ...-: ..,..,..,r• 00000.00000.0...00(powomoo.„.. :::::::: :00c,. ..:.:.:.:.:.... . •• •••••• • .,,. ,4: 4.., Elks .ostiii1111111111 IN . .t 4 li: • ....';'''''.'.. '''''''' .:.::!.::: ::NE:. •A°6°c°o°,P&PcP•Wo°o°o°0°10o°00y, 1 Li::::: "A':. 4441 ii141110,1-,---Li 400,1•:,' ••VA, '•• .t:.:::MiliiiiMii.i.i °09 °0:07,00:0:0:800.00.00.00.• i l'.:•••.a.............. ..1,.:-. in....; 'I7 y m•; o o o o ., ...,:::::::::::::MK:K: .o°o°oVociocn o o o o o o o o o o o• ,•;•::',f.::::::::::: ;1, Itingt011iillni' .• r a,: -0.000% ... i:::.:::::::::::.::::::::::,:::::: •0000.0000.0.0000000.000.00. ............................... 1 .•1•1'•,....r. •• . •IIIIIIL_,,..,„"1,,•!'' „,•,,,•••P't .•;.1 ', L 1 %c.c.. :....,:.:.:.:.:...:::.:. .. .00.0000.:,• . •...:......x............ •000.•,...c. •.0.) ...,........:.... 1,4 . 0.3.c.c.oc.c.c. . .........,....:.......... oc.c.......c.• • •is.uniu.s7,4,' • •,.-7 ........,c;:e.. ....' 'E:t :::::::::::::::::::::::::::: .3 a000000• ,t• ..... •••••• 4.3-.;•1111 ii,elasysiisompet''.47,e, .'•:.•••:0••••,.., ,', '''''jail ir..1••••11•••/•••.;:s. .., •,Q..66.1.....a.-jok , •• •": •0000000 .4._..'• :....:-.......x.: ••• NI tIMIIIMMIIINIFdi •0• .,.., ... . •••• ft. : **i:'::::iigf:':'::::i:::: J:P,2.;1,3 •'00• ..,:j.1,! .:::::::::::.;.;.:.:.:. :.;63 art Imoimill MI.4.00,0y-.. ..,,.. .1 la II."111111 lq"• . '1.1"Tigrkillill:'-':..9% .1„ a laiNg .. '/-4. •I'':'?j.'''C.1):•.1.j':lir'''.'...":4..o.,":15:4 ::::'....::::".....:::::::::::::::1....:::::: 100 ..;MI IIIIIIMMIIIIII . '" •..... ell 11111111.1111.i...•:;°: ''.'.• .-."111114fr''''al.i .k" '',. ..:.:::::::::::.:..".'‘'..e?',?•:(‘';;.'5. -",'"(%. ?f.',.'1> ::::::::::::::?....::::::: .1.. .....1.0...01,1.•......... '•'el;•,. , . r..,,.,..i.,•, ,t,0)• . r.:' .s.„.n e i r.-$:.':.,-.) ,•.e?•..., :•:•:•:•....•••:.:•:.: '' ..`:" irt 1140181111?1 l'AV.` ...:4:11t.b:PC2. .I'll'f::ii(.1 4..;::C i:N'::.:?:';r 4:.'CI;?.45''''?;.7 i'rt:..".1i;:.1-:::.'..';;?q:C;;:-'97;!7...- s." ..:::::::nU 0 •,G 4..' , or.•2!!!!!1•1! "no •..o. ••3'kef:-••••Ar•,-..(2,. Inlb.'61)1.1,1- ,6 I.)!tf).•4,'...)...,q.•.••4•,-•r;r);.;:v,•-•...1 a../.1•,,,-.._, ............: ,,• . f •c-•• 9;',.v,•c1-.•• •v.--rf"texv,^,1,, Ismi,•••,„0•,.„,•,-531.:,. •-.-,f:••-,,,,$-. - ,,qv).3t.- .,•,--,c1.,„, (,-,-A.,,,,:z...:, .,,, c,.43, -gliii g .,c•-•,.,-0? :i,,., ""S•-:,•:.457:,( '1,11a, d•.;;-,(if.P'• '•i Iri;.,..f:• ,r,c. ,...c i...); .. ....•..",".-"CI-6AC)..4"' ' 4 :i . ..i. • e *.:'..,9';',... -7•,`,fir•.-(:7 . -me lib. •-• _ --__. . pm. • c, , "'',V- e&4•Z•gi,:•.,„, .:i'A,,.'u6:e;-.1,Y,;*/.7-1A;1,J r?.'1:ii',..r..'; • • .. /fp..": ' • . ..ip. .„,..,...,,,..:.,,,\....;..,-., :.,,, .....,,,V.,`C;;::'6,•.li*" ilit 7,'."*.•C•tf-1-/--•••••••,•••,.., et;...J. 4,11 AM'4 '' •`11,,,-•1:!,I!";:`;':.).e..1. ::..1.,.....r......1 0 m'Y•••'.6". '..N „..t4 0r.t..etT -1),‘Pi- . 1;;$.411: Ilk .•irv ,,,ip..,.,e.:pi,q,0..,.ri 0,0 ,. ;•,,,t . ta...11.0.:Atot.eco( •4,66n....";. •..,... ., lihi ,c , c In.,.... oca••,.,(.0 ...s.0., .. .. • -:4411: • . it' • 7-4..•- •CO•I'SMC.PirSia AMMO . .r,,:;,•i, 11 my' i ••o o o o o• N 0000• 1.,•::/"ZIT`: . . t ,• • i ,•,5y.%(..!'). :'.i ' . P..:c',E... °.• . N i,p --,et't.r'. '6:,'P'''iii''''':k•..P LAND USE ELEMENT • „..; ‹.,-. ,O.•^ .:', •'11'0;to.1,,,,.;.,•,(;..c.• , • ,::iiffiiiii::;.... ,6,--,•0•,1-..•.-•:.•o•,.::-••-•-•,4'2..1,3:- ;•,"t-Afi-;;•'' NI ,4 1 ,'..:::::.:::Mi:-iinii".:11iiiiill':•0133•.*:•$.,1•;,..•,I.„.. o 0.0%. . . .7 .,„ ,,;,3,-,...,..•"1.- c-0.00• " .aigriii.•:i::i.i11::i.M: , .,•S•;.7.,•.':_•••g.0..••. • 0008)00006e. c I Single Family • i Commercial . ..3••• :-::-W!:::-:;•,-,•;:wi,:;•••,;••., -,.:,.1,i.s...-- ' ,...e.::?. .00.°0°. -,..,.\.,?00.1„,,. . .0... ,•0_,. 00.. • ;-;.,• 1,9,:• ••••::::::•••••::•:•,:•:....:•::::•:•:•:•:• ,,, .,,,.....,?... 00.0: ..!,;,:.•c, -.0, '.f" .• ..,...'::i•::i:::::i*i.:::::.::::::::::::::::::::::::•-• .•,•;•',-.4. ••--..•"(;,.cs,'•. • -• •••..••••• •-•0.•,••-•--- • • •:' 4 :•'.:.:.:.:•:•:•:•:, ' ..!=Q"ai::".aiiM'4•••-•,•••1•"‘r•-°-'.,3;•••••N"`A'“••••'....• 0.-...4 -:::•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:: Low Density .... •••••••••• •- 4, :.:::.:.:•:•:•:.:•:.: 'iv • ••••••••••••••••••,• Am.,.:0`20%°...le, ::::::::::::::::::::: Multi-Family Office / Office Park : ::•1 ii ..‘,:i.-,;::::•G‘. lIllrIMr‘s 0°0 •:•:. i 0 '!..i:s.•!--v.,• !" Frri............. :•::: 1 000. ...:•R:c...,.;•::::::•: :. 1 .0 :::::::::::::.. .:,! .• ....... .......... Medium Density ........................... ........ .0.00.0. •‘3. .. 00 ••:.:•:•::::•:•. ,..t. ...00.0.0.00. , c80 "•!, Public/Quasi-Publi .5., ""•••"••" Multi-Family .000.00.00.0.00, •• .00 0,::•:•:•:•••••• , ...,:,.' .i..12...:;.:::::::•:•:;i::-./.:. • •::•::::::..••••:-...::. 7.,...- .,:l:iiimiira • „ .:::....• ig:.::....::.::.:..i ::....--.1-,, i:G. i ..,iiiiiiiimmi High Density • . . :::.:• ..:::i.„,-.-0.00 1111111 --L•mi:mg : Multi-Family Light Industrial -)„.. - ., 'e.....,••••tc..i.; --.-- •::::::::0.0..00 „...„,,, 0.00.0.00.000 .3 •,•,, 0• ..r...CT 6 • • ) .„ •000000• .L. 1•.'4"r•,.4. C” • "(..., • • • _. •; •000000. ''''"q Recreation I. • -..7:00.0000°.°00. - At• -, • ...I Heavy Industrial .I? IN11111 .. . W.. • • • _____ .'Vl 6.•.‘ .7 D• .4,...,6 t„,•_:,:•„. . I 4. ,':.g 4, Greenbelt ---_ _-_-_-_- p:, •%, ,-,•.12., c.q.i --6/ ---- Manufacturing Park .,, IN. , , „ . . • / Multiple Option . ,.., . . • • • • • • �.YD23Y P�1S?,2Apy.Jo 21/S .fp1VN&/S2O YJYY O)oVNS : .P1oN • //1 Yolk • !•••, .oz.,, :""'P A/V 7 o/ 31/S:: 'c ;o • i _ 1 4Y41 RA,Y0 ., ;t • • r 1 1 ' it r •, ' I OlAy�—,-or ,or, I ,Ili--04 ;ly�f. r 1 i . .4i I _ ov•o9 0 \I �\ I Ar.»niyv i ? . . — L AIL •I, As).V]oj' • ) j....:_'1..-i'- -'.-:: -' -- .\_ - - f ... :::,•: IN 1/4.04 • Ari�•/.+, ^,_ -' _._:1:: ' 1 `s '_ _ --.-- .y •:. • I o / iI j • ;i,y :,.....1...::1.' . \W. 1 4 4�1t,. '. • 1 a :o: O - f:, • • 1pJYtS•gx IV -1 iY i_ 0 - gp. ill.-:.-.% - ' • : iY Y 1 :1 (: • 1 • i . • • • • 1 , ZEVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVI IG.„ Fire re...\len-kwi n APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS EINOT APPROVED • Any development and/or construction shall comply with current Fire and Building Codes and Ordi- nances. A second means of approved access is required. Fire Department access reads/lanes shall be paved ninimum width 20'; minimum height 13' 6". Yes. , No Preliminary fire flow calculatio Is show a fire fir.w �t dit teA. f3vd,v v is .equired. 0711 - hydrant:: a itinirratiii fl:Y.:; of ..........._ /ivy. gpm each s required. • Primary hydrant is required to be within _/err) : ..feet of the structure. secondary hydrants are required to be within ._ . . �—"W .:_....� feet of the structure. An approved automatic sprinkler system is required to protect the total structure. Yes o AlI fire department access roads are to be paved and installed prior to construction: Yes No— All fire;hydrants are required to be installed and approved prior to co;Istructi,n. Yes No DATE: . SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE • REVISION 5/1982 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; �C.-17( n APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS n NOT APPROVED n _/ . 4 G� (1 � DATE: —7 ) ,P SIGN TGRE` OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE . .- ___-- REVISION 5/1982 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : f)O\\( eJJe_k ,pnl — R APPROVED n APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS n NOT APPROVED .A.+.Vk - - /1-'-a-2 vA.0-0-Q.g. -;LA. • Le ;1 - DATE: 6 ✓o- j/ �. SIGNATURE DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE cAIC� z 1 • CITY OF It°:t!F,')N . 11:3 in ini U N I) • l.-.l JUr'N 2 01C A9 r.i1H L'.i:w€.!i)flli. r. We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of additiona information properly .-' needed toprobable impact or areas where assess4-74:-.Z7.-k--r;f::_,....„4 this proposal.. 'Signa ure of DirectorA r/or Authorized Representative Date y/ Form 4 EVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; Z,OA)f \)(7 () IUJ51Qti4 APPROVED I IAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ONS ElNOT APPROVED 71-E, Su66 a,1 PI ppu c Ayloiu t S S N Arl lat) ary i Iid pkr I-te,eN Si µC N r pt L suiZR,00ry bov& Ll-NO U,S /s• • • IGNATURE OF DIR TOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVEDATE , �Q �,� • REVISION 5/1982 :VIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; // JJ Pnrm 'R' L/Tl 4/Ty ►EN6-/IVA- .0 APPROVED E APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 0 NOT APPROVED UTIUTr APPROVAL SUOIECT TOJ � LATE COMERS AGREEMENT-vi 1?w't �' , LATE COMERS AGREEMENT-SEVER i i0 ��� SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-WATER ,E od �T y,Es, /7S.- .L�t7 u.Ywt—X �ce.„,4- , z 700.e o SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-SEWER; v c� l7•S ov 14.,u2.. �� , `• ' SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE-WATER ddAjo IE)0 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE-SEWER //p !� / •°O APPROVED WATER PLAN / • '_APPROV E PLAN APPROVED FIRE HYDRANT LOCATIONS ��`� g BY F1RE DEFT. . ,� Y4 FIRE FLG.Y ANALYSIS - ...... FIRE *_.<'' _ DATE ; / 70bGNATURE F DIRE TOR. R AIIuHnpl7Fn Rr'DDcerwrATT•i•- ` /gt tsir, ZEVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISIC a"e / E APPROVED 'N APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS r1 EINOT APPROVED aei rse >4h to ,0 ilee4 Pty. ilk- lll���j-J e dam✓ILL!e C j 41. //JG`CQf r . it6e de/W.? / ' 714, /6',`/ r/fie � g /1( 7a41144/ ‘vf'/l rave a/e f ��rGyuGi'/o4..l 7//€l�l v�,1 mil. fh 2 y_r.0 4" IGNAT OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE /j!/'e 2 /y�d` REVISION 5/1982 Fnrm 1 p ) VIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : /✓a IA. E/7/-7 APPROVED qi APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS n NOT APPROVED • S 7 VIE/ II `` l z-r_ 5"1-'Q_U � ��z C1� M E 13 Irk J a y DATE: 7 i/� SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : APPROVED APPROVED WITH DITIONS 1I1 "NOT APPROVED . • er_dvizc___ ( t�J 4,5 2—2--X •? •:0---v-Ley c �C— • k (1(/2_ /YZ 1/71` 7 Ye/(. i q, TE: SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR'.AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE • CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO.: ECF-045-88 APPLICATION NO(S): R-045-88 PROPONENT: Jodi L. Thompson Rezone LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Rezone .329 acres of property from R-2, Low Density Residential Use, to R-3 Medium Density Residential Use. Property includes site currently developed with two duplex units. This is a non-project, programmatic rezone; however, the applicant's stated intent is to add two new 4-plexes to this site and to upgrade the existing duplexes. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Building & Zoning Department The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of an expanded environmental checklist and preliminary site plan on file with the lead agency. There is no comment period for this DNS. Responsible Official; Environmental Review Committee Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator Building & Zoning Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 APPEAL: You may appeal this determination in writing to Renton Hearing Examiner no later than August 1, 1988. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. PUBLICATION DATE: July 18, 1988 DATE OF DECISION: July 13, 1988 SIGNAJRJR S: . 15nald G. Nelson Building Manager Larr ri e Plann g Divisi Ma er ichard C. H g i n Public Works Director NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON,WASHINGTON AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUN- CIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND Audrey Benner ,beingfirstdulyswornonoathstates FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RENTON,WASH that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the ' INGTON, ON AUGUST 18, 1988, AT 9:00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: Jody L.Thompson Rezone VALLEY DAILY NEWS Rezone .329 acres of property from R-2, Medi- • • • umw Density Residential Use, to R-3 Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition DensityResidential Use.Property locat- ed at 1222 & 1224 Kirkland Avenue N.E. Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week.That said newspapers I ECF-045-88;R-045-88. First City Development Corporation are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published Application for short plat approval to sub- in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King divide approximately 17.6 acres of property County,Washington.The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal zoned O-P, Office Park, into four (4) lots. newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for Subject property is known as Phases IV g and V of the Black River Corporate Park. King County. Located east of Oakesdale Ave. S.W. and south of S.W.7th Street.ShP1-016-88. Legal descriptions of the files noted The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the Kent Edition above are on file in the Renton Building Renton Edition X Auburn Edition _, (and not in anALL d Zoning Department. supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers PETITIONS ARE INVITED ED PERSONS BE PRE- during the below stated period.The annexed notice a SENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON AUGUST 16, 1988, AT 9:00 A.M. TO Notice of P ubJJ c i earin g EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. Published in the Valley Daily News was published on __A-ugus_t 5- 9-88 R38 August 5, 1988.R3090 The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $ 2 5 .60 Subscribed and sworn to before me this 1 2±h day of A ug_us_t__ 19._8_8 29 vee Nota ublic for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, King County, Washington. VDN#87 Revised 11-86 - AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the ��✓ day of Aui , 1988, I deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing He�nra E, o.nt ner ocuments. This information was sent to: NAME: REPRESENTING: d0di rn� 6826 Sisf �uex,ue s Law re )ecR_ C -ip SIGNED BY: SUBSCRIBED AN SWO to before me thisTILL- day of , 1988. N tart' ublic in and for the State of Washington, resid.n at ( ,O , therein. Project Name and Number: J j1 L. -lkornp&trr R-046 -8 _. - rr. - enton & Zoning Department Avenue South 'F S . A 98055 , w V+r _-;.. • v.,.�. _ � tom. • ipfr•.n : . +. :.+dw+.i` t ,:a':av v.F,a <r _� a r +. sc._ _.... ._R+•. + .ar e J 4C , ` ! ' hiE TER t .001660 * xa•ir�-.ti.,w•M,v.ti L., awsYl++sV.T2rVW:.d+-,m:w«+�aap' i_/4.�aTYTW' .--,sti ✓•.1tie s ._... ..a... ..-AM .- _. +,KYY.+.' .•iNk.r...•a:r�,. + Xwl4,'N! .�IW?WY', 'NKh1�Yl�t ^:.itmitypri•fear ' ..... -... are.. .. ..,,. ^_«P..-vs�.Y+-Y�+^T-Fxwe%T+^:-_-r^r._�+.'..e....-�^x,ter ei-i.T ,:k:.r_,_..._...-.--a >. ,a.w.+..w,...1d.Y•[.w a.wryir:,T.s•ia�. ,,.�._,T,.wnr....- ,.,. .a+a. s w....�al'-,WJt�..-'Y 9mr.4,. 4*-.<. i.•%. ..,,.H a.... _.v.-.--_F1M. r.^`WrS.•eiTs•.Vfw,•Vi+t. %. .n. --a.---- --. -. -... _- -- �. ♦, - .,-„--_,,.... .. .-.. .-. .s ..r ..: .. .. .... 1. ...�. . rS ,.... .a-: ..r ,:.• • ,.'. a, r M. c y :a ..,... x � sf:° .., 'r r r w x ,s:<- i w, C ztx• ir."�..<.K._a1,nh...-...�..�-.,�.:. .•. __s.•4ra .uF.,t'. �: ., i` ,�` �,,_._ ;, <+F x.�:�_: a :.^ "�. a. ... - `v.? ,N '�..V, �' .a < k -•Fo _.,...... ., a. .., t�a -....s�,tA" .".6. r :.'c`�iw. _, ,.. .. .,ta.�.+. ,, '•r. �-. id °�s: �k., a .�•`�w,:•�c.,a- �:+,k rjr....�a r.a,�.,•.- ati ��+..-��. ;:.�.J .:,e fit,.,F a '�;u _ _ -•`n`' # .u...,;-.K_ j .Y3- � t t - ,ti ¢K t. .sir .,. a .2y.xn4 k. per.;-•�.�:.. m.._..:•y _..-.,:., 1.... - �,- ..,...�,: -':' =^x ':i - "b'� ..f a.yWa�»--S.,A .._ • ^ =r'�+-_ +�.� ,,=a SS \O VikkSlk _ -. _�^a_.- . _ . __ s,a...-. -_..� ,-.- - ,c- k?`..: :::x. _�.- -.P _ •�c.::� ti _ -r' .1 �' -p: _' s ,'r5`-,:z -i? .7 2_.� .. JODI L. THOMPSON '- 6820 51st AVENUE SOUTH 1 SEATTLE , 98118 it x :icy a %:x- T. ;^k '+Cs, s t i x �M„a'y �mrti• : ~ i Ar - • F CLASS M���' --- __ ...- 'en ton 1 .--,„<:-.,-,--_,---,„---,&-------..- : • & Zoning Department . _ _ • 1,. stsiTo7;?-\ c•-••:..).-<•.........7 - 's ' U'' POSTAbEl:k"-, -• , _ _ . - _ .• .. .. ._.. , ,• ,...,-..:-• . ...- • :: - . --•-„,..- ••--: . i ,.. ..:..,.,z;•._, .. • _...,.,.* , ._._ .-_,,, i ti'•-•;-'• •- i . , ,.: ...s rr .,7, * , Avenue South - 11. -is . A 98055 huG 9 .13 ,i....:"...... ,..i.,. . a_ . ,. WA '‘. -- 7:::-.. -7‘.F.:30'Eceriti.50 ',14: _., 4:* I, -. .. ._,-... ,...„,.. .. • . _,... .....-..-- „.„ . .. - . , .-,...,...,,,.. ..,.. „:...- _ . _. _.... ..,....., . ,...,.-. , - -- . .;-- . ,* .. . -'''%'''..-.:•45r.:''''','N-.;*4".*,r.n.,,,t', "-'.,,,.-.2*1.''?4,'!"^-,.,-..4:',.. ..; '., ,-.--,,1141.r.„..,,,, .-,..........yi:',,, '''r• - 'V-'-' .... 4,....----••'' ' , , ' . ' ,..,'--1:4-...''''.--1.,t.i.e......,:.: '=:,..-';',......';'-Vki.-WV",$:: 443— ..61.r?..,1,-,'iieelikal'Atteltt.4=4". ...44-'•".??-7'14 ! ':".....-..... •:''..'..-7.--„7.--,--.:-- --_::.-,=.,,.-....'-'-,,.-,-..-.',-,7.--.?'•',,,;',..:-.......:,---..-.,,-,, .--,....,-,..`',',,,:j•: ..'4,4,1-,, ,i-,' .•.,,t,..4. ...6i.c.. 1....,-,:ze -•,.---1A2-...,•y# ',-1•:. ... 2. --;•fitj-4t4's'fi,r;?' "? :; =---'jet'''..72'''•....:-'i-t'•!.---*,:74--;.1 4:.'"''''.., ..' '''''' ''''''''''.'"';-"I''• ..4,,-•.......,.... 1'..• 7?f,-,,,- •-•,'t '';'--- ',-,,,":....1,....., i',,-.?"..,'•' ..-.:,. . :.. .. '". . ', ,.. , . , ..-----,:. .--,:'••...•,,. ' '...- ' ';-•p-''' '''r' '•A., '''' `i' ''''. .V"..07.,t-elf, : ,.., ,,, ".T..!:,•"- ":.`: , —- . --- . .•-• ' - ,,.," -- .,..;..... ' -.---:,...-;',;..-',._:,'"..."., , -.' . -'-r",.-- ,,-- -* -„'' -.tee''Ll.',.,..4.--.. ,..i..24,"'...**A'''t-t.',--"'.,:r•':--. ;''''"....-..''' ' - . -.:••• _,. ,..-. -. --.... . ....__....... . .. . . _ .. . 0. . , . - • . , .' • ..- .. , , .‘4\i,.. . , • _ . . . 1;1‘ .14'*j .• . L.. _ .. "".1;/.5..,,i,i14,,,A,"4,41-''''.,:l.,.:.:,-,.'-'"'''''V'L"-..-...., :,,'"- .' .- 1...''-?,..74.1....,''' '="T"' --.'1.7:.,7,*.'''- ' ,.,•/'- - '-'''T".... S.: i 4._ _. . , _., _..., .;._.. . , : ,,.„ _ .: ' .-, . , ...., . ., - •-..----. i ._, , , . •'' ,,,.. ,..;.\--',,;,,_, •-,,;'','''• ;.'.'- -; -,' ...."...:_;:z1,1.-4:-. ;;;":7-4,- -,-- --T.,-;:::"7...--7-•,•,-- -"t--!7_:2,-::::: :, ,,i.., :!r1::_4V...t...--...,:.,;4•W7.-;T..-iti:,,I;77,-4;: .. _ _., , • ..., -„,,, . --„_•- , _ . ..., t,•.,L „..t-„,gs7';,e-4,-,&.-04-;4,4-•:---••„4-,'.-4'-i--'',•,.1'1"7-"-_-.. ;'-;; .,,Z-,i.i..,.:A-'..l::.:,A•.;•,',--,-..g:-x.,;:;;,-,-.-,-_,.=.-"-.-7..--e---,-4•-,-,..i,,,.y;,.''.,f-•-,,'"--,:,-'.,.-,-,-,-"`',i.„,,-..-,: 7--,ii•"t:k:4.,.--,„;&,.-'"-"--,-1-:•1-:'..•.4-,-14-'.4-,---l--; , t LAWRENCE M. CAvPBELL -. X ,-'r•X--,;-•7t;--S.Z-.i-. ,^7.._.?5!.Z.r,:I--..;.-`-..-.i-/.-,,";-".V1.'„.7-7.4:7,.71,"-,•,.4, ...,..._. __. :.... . . : _ -- • - . . .. . . . . . _,.. .......:. . ., . ...,-. .. „ ... -. •--.- .. . 1609, SOUTH CENTRAL AVENUE , STE A-1 _ , .,:_,,. . ... _._..... ..--i.,..- _ _: .:,---7.--...,-.,, , :f.,..- ,::: ::,:._..--, . . . .., KENT WA 98032 -,,J. ..4-, '';'.'' , ' _... .t.i.1".....ttrilS'i''';.:;2".. .1.57 4..*7”..•.-.72.t.t..,: •••.-....,,-;...-',--.'.'-':."`-t-•:-.‘=..;:;',- ...2...--..... -2.,.4...s.,-..---;`:.."27-2 .:.----•-•----i-:A.Y.k...,, ..--••.',..i. ,:fe?.-,=- ,,,,:a:!;,,..,i,.......„., ,,„-.:,••_: -,4,i.-4-1,,,,ii,-;-:;,-xev,",..,10-,,',,:a',>,..,:"--.•;',-,•2t-4.-:,,,,- , •-•"-'''-'7'''-;,-,;%"--Z-f--"-"-,•;•, -;:i:*---,,'",--,i'••••"-7.'"'-'2‘,-":---,4,',..le,,k V .?','0-,. •. ",,I.,..tV.-.4.t‘,. ,,,,-_•-..„..v..F.i447,;_;.„.,,,tr- '' ..,.,-.,i:-'-,.;;.,-;•i,:,,-4.-- '4'-'''.'s'--ir.!,'-'''''n-7:•1'-'-*"" .-- i.::-1--'. . . ,,.,,,-.40;:i(g• ,',',,,, ",= ,-7.i1`,47-•i•i '-', ,-,-,--- , '-'-'‘1:•-''''::-!5'''''''-'-r----,.'-'';', 7-',_:4`-':7-::'---•'t•-•'',.:',...''7:''':;--7"'":1.-;'-'.'''''''''''' ''.;?;1''F-r'-': ,;-''''t-4:-'•:-','''f-:"':-•::.Z--'',,'','"..t---•5•-r,,-----/"...4','-!--1•-!.'7'----,;-,.,-,-,;.-,:,-,47:, ,., ,. _ ., . ._ ,. __ _-_- -_-,-_,-.',-- ,.---, ..- , • ,- - - ',A.---=', ,,e*4.,',4--'''','''',L.,- Y.'.AT .".'"..-,,,,,',- .)61,4.f,"•:.A.,;*".L.c..514,',' . ,...rYtelt.`i,--,...,;,,-,,:-._, ..., - .,...-.:-:.,''. ..,:-.,,,'*;:,`,....:5,...,.:',;':',T,'7,.''''''"?.'''..,i7.,74,s44%f&:,1‘.51-4,--wf.-,,--4r,§4V-:"-7-',.. ',,r,,,,-7, -a‘,4-•,„..,.- -=-&-,t --,-- F-'-'''''''"-'' - . - _ , , ,. . ,. _. ..•-- • •••,,,,,,,1-',',---..;',4,",:,,,,-!", --'2-9.'•:,--1","'".'_-27,:‘,.k."-'-•,•tf`",...',-'-''''"''''''-;‘,--..5:,,--,',:-4---.,...:-1",,,.'.';',-,.:,,..4,,-;',,,,,r_-,,,t•+--x-f-44.4.74-:•+,;-•.-,,.,-,,R-.7-.*.i',.:.'5f:ti-,f4,...4._:?,-,,,,"_,..41r. "'4,"'''''W-r'''''-'`''''' '''-.'44..,':'' ,'%,^jt.'....'''-'`"'''''''.:,;, ... ..jii,c,..4";Jt.,.."71n„..,-..1.,,Ia•, "...4...F,:.,`,,a,f„;r/t-Ter0,....,-„,.,-,,..i..,:',,,...„,.,_,,-...,,,;,.,-,e,, ,,,,...:.,.,.-..'r..g, ' '',,,41,,,,-:;.;..)..,.-,.-,,,,.-..;-.,,-4- "aSe,".?lt....'.,,,....-.7,4"t .,f!V•,.,..---?*-ArA-'.,..-- "4:''.••,'''''''''4''''''''''''''',';-''''''''!"."1,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,e3m,,,,l,V..'ilit.:ii'Y".'." '." ' '.,,,,,,,,„,._:.„,--,,,, .,," ..,..,,,,,,,,...74.s.-.:7.-....,-;.,..,t-,-, .,.,.:.,....;.•-f.,........,,,,,...,...'i...,,"•:-.1... .--7-4,,...:,:..,1,4:...,-,...,_,...T0,-,A•,,p..-<.1. ...:,4,.,.,.... •,,,, i:•••,,,-;.,..-.. . . ._.„. •...,,,.,.,, -..-,4-•••• 04e.44t.r.44,4401.?..-..-w;• ...*-oi,.2.1,-. ... ',44-4i,---,--- . .-•4-,'.q.l ',,,It'•-•,..,.,--411-t.:,g4;z,.2:•"--' •-.--2--zt•-vr,v2r2r-z. 1-.2...:-.,4,;-:,-.7- 2--,/,'..,•>2.•.:•.7.2---,..••i.4..,".2,-...-,•-'•'•,-- ,,•-'•'•''',•-^- ,--2,-.2-,!".•t.-..--•.-2-'7F,',7-.,- - - -_ -•;,"!.:•.• ...•,- :.,:•,--.'---•••,_.,..,'•'N,...-,---:.,•••:-..,'',",t--... •-2--•.4.-,fo,-T':;4,-?.,...i1.2".....-:-i"--•••';•-•-:•24.;. .t.,174-3,..ii4•4 V40,0grf;42,31..i •'.."-•:-N•c•! "- ''' *AIA .-'1".',. -.-'0-' '..` il'tT.,"'',..., '-,. ..r.'---,-',.',-..`i!'''',--1...-.,e7'.,,,,,--riy.:/..,-.,-:=',3:.".:,;.--,.,::,,,,,,.--..•:.---,,,,71.,,,, ,,„. :--,,,:i,-,:.-„,•,,,..„-„,,-,,,,,,...,,,,:,?.. ..-.-,,,,,,,,,-,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,. •. , , ),,d -,;r:',.;.,•-,:-- 477:.;:.- ', ...' ,., ,t,a,,,„*..-. -4,3:, , . - - ,,: - - : :7-:,..'',.,--;,...vk...,-,t, 4--.----4,--L,41.-,.'",------7,:-.":,'-s._4•.-,_.4. - - ,..-.-.-- -. --,:,-. ---...-,,,,-*1.-.....4, -_- , .4.t..,-.. ., ._ , ., , ' ,-_-,...;:a'-*-....------,-=!,.'04.,..-,:-.•.'",-.,..1-,7; ,,,,r.-.F._11.,...--,...-`•....-4.0----z-..!,:'---2.',,;-'i.g.--,..',..-.''2,:ii:::.-2.2?-.`i-<:iwyz•-t-e.,'-$24%..i: .4rrV•i'Irr'•-.•.".••••-:'-",'!4'•!;'..ih'b.'..-:.--;;;,=.',.c.---•','..-'•'`,. 4.4,-. - -..-j.`,":.fliG':.-1,-- :,?,- . ItT,44 •- .-,,rd' -V-2..4v-..,., •4- ie.•.,,,,I•- ., .... .... .,...i., . .,:.,„,,,..t,-,..,, s•q_.,„-,.•5.. .,1,942,,,,,,,....„ :••?".z-::;;-4"-..---;-:-.,,i-A,,N,,, ---t- : ".",:_f_ r.•-:i.,„,-'„,-;',0-,.-7-;atiV,N. ..r„- ,,,:e.!'_-, ,. .',;:yra-.A.,'.,,-,..-..-7--_,...5?,,. tv„,•,,,,,',....,.._ ,..A-",„,-r--4,;;;;.;,--.-':',...:-,-, ; , .. , _ . ,.. _ _ , . - - - •-, _- ..-•_, :.„,,,..,.- ' --..'. __-„,..,:::-• ."':. :' . . . _ „ - , -, '„-,y • - ' '-"'"-,::--"-----':_,, "---,,„ .-7,-,:-. .-•-• -..-„:„....,;,,..-::_:.:f.;,';2:,.i,-,:-.f..-. •- ‘..,..•.-.-:-.--...:2,--.2-.. -•"...-:,2,I.,:i---',-:,;;;:'-^- .P.'''''.„-,,,-:,4..-',24'^',.1*-',..,.,:a.'..3414-- - ._ ....... . ,- . .. ' ,-.• ':' ..'' ':' .- ' r- ' , '_ . ., ,,. ,... .„, -..,:,..,..,....;,' _..::-:..'.:'..:..-7.'....'''''-'',7' : . 1.-''''•''F''-;,':'-7'-.: r`--''' s'.'- ".-',,,:--•--;,,:Y.fr----,—.'."-'- ,-.4-..i-'4, 4 ',•---:'.,V 74, -,-i-,,:i, W.,-,'.-: "il:,k,•,_e;,,,q'„.17,.f.4..',;;;'0'''.5 ..4,4'' - -'4211-:-.'2.----,•‘•r , , . r7, ' - -•,,",-,.4.,,,,.„-;,':''',,',r,.:,,.,,.''_.4,."i.,,,',!,!e":F.,,,,,,,l ,i.i.",.A.„...i Z,,,,T•,,,,,.,..:f.-',i,,&..,'.4.,-.. 4„(,,;,,„,.„,•-,,,,,,..,,.,i g, ..,:„.-44,W-r'---,• v•,,,o,,,g,,;'‘;,,,•,-;r.--,•'•:-'2 ,...'•',.(-,'-'2•7 ±-.';'''',1`," -;-'•-•"_47- 1:-'-:•::',---'•'•-;:::'''''.-'-:'''','•'-'s-'- *1''-''' ' --r'''''''"7',''.-. ":r•- '''•-,n •.',-'-2.2.-"' - •-.2-----•, •-' ' •-.----.:-.- ' - ,••-• ':•'-:'.':','!!".'''''"-.1f)-.' `-•;,:••:-...17',,.----:-I: -.-..-.„.•:-., .,," 2, -2,::--i..1'.:., :-. ---,-,..---.,,,,,:•-•:,,,...1 r=-2,.*A•'.. . .-7.=.1,'•,,..........„.-',•-,--r•.;:N:74--,-..•......-44r.. ...._.:,..-•.“22.-,..;r-: ....w4v..---g•-,-,7---.,i,-....„.,v_..-,.,-:-.7,, .„ •-,1),;•-• _A-41.•• ...,_ f ii,• ,',.7..?4'''"'..'. , ,'''''4'' ''''''''' ,..."'4'-'''''1'2.^-#?, ,:i,:- .,,,...''''..-4X-,'-';',.?y,,,:fi. ,,,,,,,'-.'"-t,'-;Q!..4,. 3-',.44.',.:-.;, **1-3VZ.,.., ...tr.T. '-''''...-,'"i-1.":4.ti7A,It-^.;•,,i'.''.--,^....14*-,-.4..-'0.';.1.,T11.A.c.,,,er.4.17 ';'744'" .-;:.."41.;.,,,. ' ttitli. . ....-..gl`',...........-.......- --.-..,•,,::.' -'.-.'',,"'..-''',.,....-'''.',"•-,--.,-,--7,-.-..t.r.....'..'.,.'-''.':..t ' - '••'''-'4'....''-'',;4,4',-,-,...f- '' ..i',.''',-..''..4..1,' „.''''... .‘ .!...,-1.7.---.-4,-; `',---,,'-t..,::'''A-.----,,,,,,*,--,''''.' z-is...'" 1.-.:,:',":.k:'. .--;v:.k'42.44",";"..,?..;',,tggire,..-7,4 •-•`.1.1`..;4..,.. .:,:'!'"'"."'qr.ti:,',.'- ',.."".'''''..I'-'"f.."-rc...-:'f-::'-'.a'ir.- ...4-.?-',....!.7,-'..i.--,z,'$'1:,,,-;....7,.. .......,-.Y.;,,,,,....-..-.7::',.'",'""''.t'-',..',-4-..,,...:,:i7';',..,'",'",,..,!f•-...-'-r,;•.:.r.,:f.-.-..".,..,•:-.•_ .7',.:`.....;':,,,F"..--..7...,,fit,,,,,•....",.'..'_...,,,--.2,-7.„..Y.-;:,..-,,,,.7!,..r...-..;:•....2....:,.2-,,.....,.„:„„,--;.,,f,;.-,-..,,A, •,,,__,,•• -„--- ..--, ,,--,--;_„-, :.--';';';'''''`:'...**61-71'7"r'''V''''' '' i.!.'' '''-'..65r9'';'• ':.r-7.!''''''71-6-'/'''''f'''-''''''--:'''''''':-787"-';:e't'''''•:•'''''.7-*-•-•tfj.- ---- 7"-'''''v‘`''''''7''''-'''''' •'-••" 't•'-':''''''7 -:--77 '-'' •,',--'-',,;-`-'-'-: '-'!'.-,Z'--':--•--:.-''''7.,,;?.77.2i:••,:,...2,•:-:;-;*;••,,_,:•,•.;2,.'.-,.V.22.:,'.'...•:- 2..., ...A•sg-I;42.,,2A,n..,-;:-.5.A!2,.T.-,-..,•_-,.-:,-,:-. -.„..,,,f,„,.;- ,,... .•-,:, „-e,.,„,. ,,••_.1,,„ ,,. -2?..,,,i.2f.(4. • 2.•__- -;. . „z.,.-'..-',...•t„.:•-nwo„-.22.3:?F.;•....Atf.....-,•••,...--:•---,•7":2.*--",,.2'...•••----'-;-",-.''4,P-' .-2-t-t7:. - , :":'-',27.f 7.' 1..''', ''':.,,i-'",-,...;,',,L', ''''':''''':',.....' -,-'.- ''-:' ' ''''‘ ..:' 't. ..'`'''...1...X.;-';,,....'',,•:;:f;;'..i.7:4;4i,,'..,''::-.",-;-,-,,,,-,-.;...Y-n-4,,,i,-t,--::'-::_.; :,,,'!":7,.."•,,A---f"--,4- --'"----'-' ,z-„-',2;'IT,i,-..:".:;:l-.7",•.4'1",:.•,..:,Z:.,•:„„-,','*-•,.,]i•:.--i,"-_,:-.4,-- -i,,".,I:4-_,--,... -",":4'.."1 -"I'0-'4'.:1,+"'rz-. 4t0.-M-••:'."•, • - . ., - ' -''.-7''-'--',.'•:::1•-.7,1.;'-t''-:'-'f,f'''-,-,';'','±' ...''':-.1',-- ' .'. :;-"-,,-i','•-:•;:.:".,:,,--.- -'„-:. ,:- -"."-,:.'i-:'.--'",-7-s.-'"cs".:-.7„-.:--".' .':,--:',-..l..;',',-,-,,;"...-;,;':-.:-.;•. . L.„:,_,:;,::-,. „, • - - , •,.; ',... ' *:' '%.' - '' .,.;' X,t'SSttr,V',?77:'‘.....7?:' :l: - ' -- '- '-:-;.-,,,-2:',,-..,-„;-,..,,•F 7-.f-t-t,,,,-.-1='---'-',.-5%.•.:-.4.?. "-f:i.',.:..',...,....,-.:,.-1.-::" :2._''. .,:,;,..,••••:- !. . , .. :::;',.,.....,...,....-.-: ".:-..,i-f',.;--__:-";.,..;,.',,'7., ,,,,2',.•72...",`..2;-,.-7-„•;.,• -- • .•-,-.;,27,-,.-•'-2-2-.;-'N'•-•-''ff0c..1":-'-':".•,'''--'.7!--.7-'-''•_:,i-•`--C••,7-'-,"--.' - - --',----.: -.-', -.-: --..--'• -'"..'"-i•-•'"--':,,..----.''''':--''-'t'---.''-L''-''-','--• -' ''-''":=--'-''7"..:,';:=7:, '-' ' '''. ti‘ ,,, -,-,:::,."--:,,I._ '.,,,,:,'-•-_-..,,,,',,,,,,;:i,`,.;,,,,, t,i,,,.:,,j-; 4,,W71;4,--Ai*-7-5,k-',-4?-kr7'7.-3, .**-` : , . „ , . .. .., . _• ketc t . . ._ . __ t NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON ON AUGUST 16 , 1988 , AT 9:00 A.M. T O CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: Jody L. Thompson Rezone Rezone . 329 acres of property from R-2 , Low Density Residential Use, to R-3 Medium Density Residential Use. Property located at 1222 & 1224 Kirkland Avenue N. E. ECF-045-88 ; R-045-88 Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Building and Zoning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON AUGUST 16, 1988 , AT 9:00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. PUBLISHED : AUGUST 5 , 1988 Ronald G. Nelson Building and Zoning Director CERTIFICATION I 1k1-<R ! . t I OD , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT FIVE (5 ) COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS WERE POSTED BY ME IN FIVE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON OR NEARYBY THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. A T T EST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a 19C6 2—"T - Notary Public, i and fo the S ate of Washington residing in on the ,S4k day o SIGNED:_ T- 1)010( #214 CITY OF RENTON POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor August 3, 1988 Ms. Jodi L. Thompson 6820 - 51st Avenue South Seattle, WA 98118 RE: Jodi L. Thompson Rezone File No. ECF-045-88, R-045-88 Dear Ms. Thompson: A public hearing before the City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner has been scheduled for August 16, 1988 . The public ' hearing commences at 9: 00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. The applicant, or representative(s) of the applicant, is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you before the hearing. If you have any questions, please call 235-2550. ely, Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE/adk cc: • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2552 I t% VI "{ CITY OF RENTON kY POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor August 3, 1988 Mr. Lawrence M. Campbell 1609 South Central Avenue, Suite A-1 Kent, WA 98032 RE: Jody L. Thompson Rezone File No. ECF-045-88, R-045-88 Dear Mr. Campbell: A public hearing before the City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner has been scheduled for August 16, 1988. The public hearing commences at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. The applicant, or representative(s) of the applicant, is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you before the hearing. If you have any questions, please call 235-2550. Sincerely, ,I•a ' i Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE/adk cc: I 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2552 S 1 •1`M, -.C x,. k,.,rYe.C"JY w,C' ,ASS'! 'n"�'4 0 W F ?�F -1. ry' P'._ `{',E '�'" =f5 •4«S;S `.• 'Cj �� Oy c lx f ,,wi W: . ...,,, Sri E c ". , '' '4 r1. , i� x.., fi " 2 O9ATD SEPSE�"P r. City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner will hold a rI. • I in CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL . ON AUGUST 16, 1988 BEGINNING AT 9: o0A.M. P.M. CONCERNING: JODIO45 L. THOMPSONSREZONE REZONE OF . 329 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM R-2, LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL USE, TO R-3, MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL USE. PROPERTY INCLUDES SITE CURRENTLY DEVELOPED WITH TWO DUPLEX UNITS. THIS IS A NON—PROJECT, PRGRAMMATIC REZONE, HOWEVER, THE • APPLICANT'S STATED INTENT IS TO ADD TWO NEW 4—PLEXES TO THIS SITE AND TO UPGRADE THE EXISTING DUPLEXES. i i [ 1 , 1 \'''"--7/71 : . _ .V.,.((ANO AVCNBC�14f.-. ...J r C 1 Y L,• MO •'V , • ( • :i::-,1,..ii:.:.'. :,:iyirti). 1 4,,,;.:.::•::;;.:.--.c .:i:i,::.:,,,..:,;::..,.,!,.,:,.,... ,,,.'::!r. 'i' .. : .:,: spr . .._ • ‘1.,,.., , : ,4 :.: ?.., . • . 1 !I i.i.4.; 0:f.. i,..,. II (p �, r,_ ^I i' :• '1 is i Y . • GENE : •__ .•..iI dR L .4kmo 41f..•r!.^.i1t•►A.J..• . ••_ _ ---_--___ ••_ _•• AL • LOC •Yn .:rrTA;t3!�w V^.:.1 2 / ADDRES , . PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1222 & 1224 KIRKLAND AVENUE N.E. • FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF .RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 • THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED -WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Y NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON AUGUST 16, 1988, AT 9: 00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: ,i( Jody L. Thompson Rezone /\Rezone . 329 acres of property from R-2, Low Density Residential Use, to R-3 Medium Density Residential Use. Property located at 1222 & 1224 Kirkland Avenue N.E. ECF-045-88 ; R-045-88 First City Developments Corporation Application for short plat approval to subdivide approximately 17. 6 acres of property zoned 0-P, Office Park, into four (4) lots. Subject property is known as Phases IV and V of the Black River Corporate Park. Located east of Oakesdale Ave. S.W. and south of S.W. 7th Street. ShP1-016-88 . Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Building and Zoning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE . INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON AUGUST 16, 1988, AT 9: 00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. Published: August 5, 1988 NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMI- NATION Environmental Review Committee • AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION The enton,Washington Environmen al Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non- Significance for the following project(s): Audrey be nn e r ,being first duly sworn on oath states Jody L.Thompson Rezone Rezone .329 acres of property from R-2, that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the Low Density Residential Use, to R-3 Medi- um Density Residential Use.Property locat- ed at 1222 & 1224 Kirkland Avenue N.E. ECF-045-88; VALLEY DAILY NEWS City of Renton, 8 Public Works Depart- • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition ment,King CountyProperty Rezone Application to rezone a 36 acre parcel of Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week.That said newspapers property from G-1, General Use to P-1, u- are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six Public Use.crSubject property is a l owned gous 36 acre site, including a parcel owned months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published by the City of Renton which is addressed in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King on the 3500 block of N.E.2nd Street and a parcel owned by King County addressed at County,Washington.The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal Monroe Avenue N.E. ECF-037-88; R-037- newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for 88 King County. Further information regarding this action is available in the Building and Zoning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the Kent Edition Washington, 235-2550. This Determination , Renton Edition X , Auburn Edition , (and not in is whichFIN willl There atis a 01 day appeal Aupegust , end 5:00 p.m. on August 1, supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers 1988. Any appeal of this decision may be during the below stated period.The annexed notice a made to the City's Hearing Examiner and Notice of Environmental Determination muststate clearly, inwriting, why the Determination should be revised and must 18, 1988 :t i J d l be accompanied by a non-refundable was published on July $75.00 filing fee. Published:July 18, 1988 Valley Daily News R5081 Account#51067 The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $ 2 6 .S U Subscribed and sworn to before a thi kday of July 1988 Not Public for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, King County, Washington. VDN#87 Revised 11/86 cjA-4.,C).-c.kr AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING • On the /6+41 day of CIAA4 , 1988, I deposited in the mails of the United Skates a sealed envelope containing cnv,romeewA chcc.V.his and documents. This information was sent to: ddxrnnolcchcar% NAME: REPRESENTING: Dept cic 14;1d I;• e t)ep-t. -Fshen JToc.. Recs Ge road W. Mo-r6e* an,4 ay. D,•lisivv.. C-/ve Binh Metro • • SIGNED BY: ��in�40. �•SUBSCRIBED AND AND SWORN to before me this g day of DU L4 , 1988. �d�� . BE 1 ... EXP'• �1,��:�5`'\ ; Notar Public in and forthe State of Washington, ;o;Z4 OVARY • residing at R it) &) , therein. •o + ..- 6C:z� Pr4.j6ag( aiti,." "►��Number: Jodi L. 'fhompsdn ( R- Oq5 - 8o) . ..44tkei," CAN of Remo,,No c \IorkS (R- 031- s ) ,V"\ Cdu41 Dept c Mott, Wovics (C:4 Q CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE • ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO.: ECF-045-88 APPLICATION NO(S): R-045-88 PROPONENT: Jodi L. Thompson Rezone LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Rezone .329 acres of property from R-2, Low Density Residential Use, to R-3 Medium Density Residential Use. Property includes site currently developed with +, two duplex units. This is a non-project, programmatic rezone; however, the applicant's stated intent is to add two new 4-plexes to this site and to upgrade the existing duplexes. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Building & Zoning Department • The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of an expanded environmental checklist and preliminary site plan on file with the lead agency. There is no comment period for this DNS. Responsible Official; Environmental Review Committee Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator Building & Zoning Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 APPEAL: You may appeal this determination in writing to Renton Hearing Examiner no later than August 1, 1988. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. PUBLICATION DATE: July 18, 1988 DATE OF DECISION: July 13, 1988 SIGNAT R 5�,��y nald G. Nelson Larr ri e Building Manager Plann g Divisi Ma er ichard C. H g n �.— • Public Works Director to 0a CITY. OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT ' Earl Clymer, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director July 15, 1988 Washington State Department of Ecology •• Environmental Review Section Mail Stop PV-11 Olympia, WA 98504 Re: Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith are copies of Environmental Determinations issued on July 13, 1988: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE ✓Jodi L. Thompson Rezone (ECF-045-88; R-045-88) City of Renton-Public Works, Rezone of Public Works Facilities (ECF-037-88; R-037-88) The Determinations are final and may be appealed to the City's Hearing Examiner no later than 5:00 p.m. on a. 9 1988. Any appeal must state clearly in writing why the Determination should be revised and must be accompanied by a non-refundable $75.00 filing fee. DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED King County-City of Renton, Expansion of Public Works Facilities (ECF-038-88; CU-038-88) The fifteen (15) day comment period for these projects will end on August 2, 1988. Following the end of the comment period, the City will finalize it's Determination unless comments received require a reevaluation. Following the finalization of the Determination, there is a required 14 day appeal period. If you have questions, please call Jeanette Samek-McKague or me at 235-2550. Donald K. Erickson,'ICP Zoning Administrator pc: Mr. Gerald W. Marbett, King County Bldg. & Land Division Mr. Gregory M. Bush, Metro • DKE:sr 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 40 CITY OF RENTON "LL BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director • July 15, 1988 . Joe Robels Department of Fisheries Habitat Management Division Room 115 Olympia, WA 98504 Re: Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith are copies of Environmental Determinations issued on July 13, 1988: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE /Jodi L. Thompson Rezone (ECF-045-88; R-045-88) City of Renton-Public Works, Rezone of Public Works Facilities (ECF-037-88; R-037-88) The Determinations are final and may be appealed to the City's Hearing Examiner no later than 5:00 p.m. on August 1, 1988. Any appeal must state clearly in writing why the Determination should be revised and must be accompanied by a non-refundable $75.00 filing fee. DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED King County-City of Renton, Expansion of Public Works Facilities (ECF-038-88; CU-038-88) The fifteen (15) day comment period for these projects will end on August 2, 1988. Following the end of the comment period, the City will finalize its Determination unless comments received require a reevaluation. Following the finalization of the Determination, there is a required 14 day appeal period. If you have questions, please call Jeanette Samek-McKague or me at 235-2550. �,,Si rel`y Dona d K. Erick n, AICP Zoning Administrator cc: Department of Wildlife • 16018 Mill Creek Blvd Mill Creek, WA 98012 DKE:sr 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington. 98055 - (206) 235-2540 !l4 J BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE STAFF REPORT July 13, 1988 A. BACKGROUND: APPLICANT: Jody L. Thompson PROJECT: Jody Thompson Rezone ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF-045-88; R-045-88 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Rezone . 329 acres of property from R-2, Low Density Residential Use, to R-3 Medium Density Residential Use. Property includes site currently developed with two duplex units. This is a non-project, programmatic rezone; however, the applicant's stated intent is to add two new 4-plexes to this site and to upgrade the existing duplexes. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Property located at 1222 & 1224 Kirkland Avenue N.E. B. ISSUES: 1. Whether the proposed rezone is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan for the City of Renton? The proposed rezone is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan which designates the property for Medium-Density, Multi- Family Residential development. 2 . Whether the proposed rezone is compatible with zoning designations and land uses in the vicinity of the site? The property in the immediate vicinity of the site is zoned for multi-family residential development, including R-3, Medium-Density Use, and R-2 , Low-Density Use. Property in the area is zoned for various types of residential development and for commercial development. Land uses in the area are compatible with zoning designations. Therefore, the granting of the applicant's rezone request would be congruent with the requirements established in the City's Zoning Code for rezoning of property. 3. Whether the development tentatively proposed in conjunction with the non- project rezone is consistent with area development? While the application submitted is for a non-project rezone action, the applicant has submitted tentative future development plans for a four-plex for each of the two contiguous properties. Staff reviewers have determined that these plans would likely be generally acceptable for the site and appropriate Technical Advisor Committee Staff Report Jody Thompson Rezone Page 2 July 13, 1988 to the local community, based upon City codes and areal development trends. Site plan review will be required, under City ordinance, for any specific development application for this site. Note: Reviewing staff have expressed concern that any development of the site be required to provide for adequate public services to the site and on-site amenities. These improvements can be and are routinely required to be included in conjunction with site plan agreed to at the time a project action is submitted to the City. 4. Whether a restrictive covenant should be placed upon the property to require it to revert to R-2 , Low-Density Multi- Family Housing, if a specific site plan for development is not submitted within a reasonable time period? In view of the fact that the proposed rezone is congruent with the Comprehensive Plan, City's and with community land uses, and in view of the fact that no development will be permitted on the site until a site plan has been approved by the City, there appears to be no cause nor any legal justification to place a restrictive covenant upon the property to limit the duration of the rezone action. C. RECOMMENDATIONS: It is recommended that the ERC issue a' Determination of Non-Significance with respect to this non-project, rezone application. D. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS: Various City departments have reviewed and commented upon the project. These comments are as follows: Police Department: Land Use: No comments. Environmental: No comments. Fire Prevention Bureau: Land Use: Approved with conditions. (See file) Environmental: No comments. Design Engineering: Land Use: Environmental: Traffic Engineering: Land Use: Technical Advisor Committee Staff Report Jody Thompson Rezone Page 3 July 13, 1988 Environmental: Utility Engineering: Land Use: Approved with conditions. Rezone only. Environmental: No comments. Parks and Recreation: Land Use: Environmental: Building Division: Land Use: No comments. Environmental: No comments. Zoning Division: Land Use: The subject application is compatible with the land use designation on the Comprehensive Plan and with the actual surrounding land uses. Environmental: Recommend a DNS. Policy Development: Land Use: Should be accompanied by site plan. Approve with time limit? Revert if a site plan is not submitted within a reasonable time. Environmental: Recommend that site plan accompany the application. With buildings & parking will there be any "open space" (usable) left on site for passive enjoyment? Will there be any play areas on site for children? Is the drainage system adequate in the area? Land use appears to be generally compatible. The checklist is incomplete-needs non- project information. ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION APPLICATION NO. ECF-045-88 , R-045-88 APPLICANT Jody L. Thompson Rezone PROPOSED ACTION Rezone . 329 acres of property from R-2 , Low Density Residential Use, to R-3 Medium Density Residential Use GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS • • 1222 & 1224 Kirkland Avenue N.E. POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (E.R.C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES PRI.DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL 74cWILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY Auguet 1, 1988 • AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., . FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT AT 235-2550. • DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION. NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION • Environmental Review Committee Renton, Washington The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance for the following project(s) : Jody L. Thompson Rezone Rezone . 329 acres of property from R-2, Low Density Residential Use, to R-3 Medium Density Residential Use. Property located at 1222 & 1224 Kirkland Avenue N.E. ECF-045-88; R-045-88 City of Renton, Public Works Department, King County Property Rezone Application to rezone a 36 acre parcel of property from G-1, General Use to P-1, Public Use. Subject property is a contiguous 36 acre site, including a parcel owned by the City of Renton which is addressed on the 3500 block of N.E. 2nd Street and a parcel owned by King County addressed at Monroe Avenue N.E. ECF-037-88;. R-037-88 Further information regarding this action is available in the Building and Zoning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235- 2550. This Determination is FINAL. There is a 14 day appeal period which will end at 5: 00 p.m. on August 1, 1988. Any appeal of this decision may be made to the City's Hearing Examiner and must state clearly, in writing, why the Determination should be revised and must be accompanied by a non-refundable $75. 00 filing fee. Published: July 18, 1988 TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA July 13, 1988 Third Floor Conference Room Commencing at 10:00 a.m. TIME/KEY PARTICIPANTS NEW PROJECTS k Jody L. Thompson Rezone Rezone .329 acres of property from R-2, Low Density Residential Use, to R-3 Medium Density Residential Use. Property includes site currently developed with two duplex units. This is a non-project, programmatic rezone; however, the applicant's stated intent is to add new 4-plexes to the site and to upgrade the existing duplexes. Property located at 1222 7 1224 Kirkland Avenue N.E. ECF-045-88; R-045-88. •. City of Renton Public Works Department-I-405 Storm Drain Crossing • Application to construct storm drain improvements to improve drainage capacity at the I-405 culvert near N.E. 44th Street. Property located North of I-405 at N.E. 44th Street ECF-031-88 • D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (This sheet should only be used for actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs. Do not use this sheet for project actions.) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal; or.the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at.a•greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous sutstances; or production of noise? I�GRE►°ts E CIF Selo i T*,2y S EA et2. P+1O 5rret R.M 5E'1-1e2- . DI ScHo.R.t ' O rJ►-4( , As e_EL-4i D To A g.E's i a E oJT-T-►.L. Pe-6 4 EZ17 ►\b(a i►e-L. Q TiAu-� 67 �-i'* TY2045Ftc R►se, @MIS%►o S (AIU.- 1412.6OUCri ot,) t-. USE.. �F ¶X I c- 1.-161 a rt L,S , Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: N ONE. It-E QU I RED, 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, o marine life?' EXISrt01 �,1ILrL, (ZeM►ht►-3 , 1=►1 lS L sce►f fz- ICE ►toioeo wt+NzE tJ dNE r.,a�l r--a sl`( Is Naj-- ., 1R LA)I LinLUF 010re,L'C� r, EKc„ter (-'X occvYsIo JftSL f*E € OF soNG.,(3 ►rpS, . • Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: NEE aza-4 12 Eb • 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? ()-)1 l-l. USE EN&y\.( n rco N ►2-►rc� P bu .cJ"S o tJ LY A T Cdti To c6-\161-oPM - Of~ A- Pt% 10Eti,rfl p, A E -r, Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: ko4e 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? OuLAO ►jc USE O`(z X=F-LT" Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: �.1arfE g lyll2.etc::.. • - 11 - •' 5. How would the propoL. be likely .to affect land and. sF line use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline LLbc5 incompatible with existing plans? 0 ` SOB e ME REST12 l CJ L1 P45Mu✓STED zr...*irJci 1s ParI6(.E mArEKISSl Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: NbE RFc u IpaEo, ex c f c,6M Pc-y w t 7.-m•cr.),ptans 5Ue.44- p,� / 5t-T4P,c.le-S L A-Nl o scApi S c Int l Nre., 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? W u I AlG2GterE D 't 05o rJ 772A-nl sfct2r ri orf, t°U LI c. screVices, two uri I T'i , PrS A-nr ' s/M i c-rase. i2ES(q6-+•ri'71°rc- P JET: Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: war g 12E0 , A-_ UTI LirtEs • pj2E lrl eL , V774£2 0n1 0l° j J Tb 74£ S TE/ AO Fu LL ( dPeemnoIJ4ta. : oNL e.dct: fro Trf+F E r Tr+g f,QoPe2T`9 /S s J6D 8Y M .rr3US, Sea-✓1 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. gyp.. . • SIGNATURE • I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may. withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: 70 p/ G. TN n,°So,t) Name Printed: B y l,4W,12-e-vct M, C.4iYlP13E-G j /4-14 C4-,c eth 7 T Tttc-- i°/toPo v • • • - 12 - 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Ipbitte. • DATE CIRCULATED: 6/15/88 COMMENTS DUE: 6/29/88 EFC - p4s - 88 APPLICATION NO(S). : Rezone 045-88 PROPONENT: Jodi L. Thompson PROJECT TITLE: Thompson Rezone BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Rezone .329 acres of property frnm R-2, low flensity Residential Use, to R-3 Medium Density Residential Use. Property includes site currently developed with two duplex units.` ' This is a non-project, programmatic • rezone; however, the applicant's stated intent is to add twQ-41P-ul-4.p..1_e-Y--to-4.bk,site t� ade the existing duplexes. OLA1 1222 & 1224 Kirkland Ave. N.E. SITE AREA: 14,333 /.329 acre BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW'ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION • IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: 2:/t1) ,(4 • (7); ' 11 • - 0,0.. J t}}}}FF.�gggg rcyyc�, olgAR We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additiona informatio - needed to properly assess this proposal. • ._ _._ / /� /yy Signs ure of Director or Authorized Representative Date///�� ' • Form 4 RENTON. .:'1JILDING & ZONING DEPAR'i MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 045 _ 88 APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE :R-045-88 PROPONENT : JODI L. THOMPSON PROJECT TITLE : THOMPSON REZONE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: REZONE . 329 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM R-2 , LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL USE., TO.:R-3 ,. MEDIUM DENSITY. RESIDENTIAL USE. PROPERTY INCLUDES SITE CURRENTLY DEVELOPED WITH TWO DUPLEX UNITS. THIS . IS A NON-PROJECT, PROGRAMMATIC RETGNET-Hos .STATED INTENT IS TO ADD T70 NEW 4-PLEX TO THE LOCATION : SITE & TO UPGRADE THE EXISTING DUPLEX- LOCATED AT 1222 & 1224 KIRKLAND AVENUE N.E . ES . TO : PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 0 ENGINEERING DIVISION n TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : n UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION n FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU 0 PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT n .BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 15, POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 111 OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED - IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M, ON JUNE 29, 1988 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : n APPROVED n APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 0 NOT APPROVED • OF S? g,, iTTP3CA Mill pi JUN RolgAR DATE: SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 2149N ENVVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET • REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 10\1weSc DATE CIRCULATED: 6/15/88 COMMENTS DUE: 6/29/88 • EFC - 04r; - .RR APPLICATION NO(S). : Rezone 045-88 PROPONENT: Jodi L. Thompson PROJECT TITLE: Thompson RP7onP BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Rezone .32R acres of prnpPrty frnm R-2, Inw Tensity Residential Use, to R-3 Medium Density Residential Use. Property includes site Lurreilly developed with two dupla units.` ' This is a non-project, programmatic rezone; however, the applicant's stater) intent is to add - site .ade the existing duplexes. 1222 & J224 Kirkland Ave. N.E. SITE AREA: 14,333 /.329 acre BUILDING AREA (gross): 01 IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION • IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air /) 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: CD REGO MEND A 0 fl)Z . CIrTY OF DEMON G LIB EE ..ev. J 141g8 We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. uve,6le -(40 2.4 —66 Signature of Dire.tr or Authorized Representative Date Form 4 RENT°. aUILDING & ZONING DEPAF, 1-,1ENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 045 - 88 APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE :R-045-88 PROPONENT : JODI L. THOMPSON PROJECT TITLE : THOMPSON REZONE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: REZONE . 329 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM..R-2 , LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL USE., TQ..R-3 ,. MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL USE. PROPERTY INCLUDES SITE CURRENTLY DEVELOPED WITH TWO DUPLEX UNITS. THIS IS A NON-PROJECT, PROGRAMMATIC RtIZUiE: HOWEVER, THE APPLICANT'S STATED INTENT IS TO ADD TWO NEW 4-PLEX TO THE LOCATION : SITE & TO UPGRADE THE EXISTING DUPLEX- LOCATED AT' 1222 & .1224 KIRKLAND AVENUE N.E. ES. TO: 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE.: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : Ei UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION r-] FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU . [1] PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT ' �CTYl°! nTONtE O� <� 5l�v g BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT El POLICE DEPARTMENT j'-' JUN24141 OPOLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT - • OOTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED ' IN WRITING , PLEASE ,PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :00 P .M. ON JUNF 29 19RR REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Z00N1ru& IJIUI5)0K1 % APPROVED I ] APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED Sc-tr53e.cr PS opu c k1 oiu 15 Ga►m prWlstr6cZ waif PO --PlroD u% oes l GA)PAW aro i I C ompite Hdau sikotc- RAKil 1sitoo uu rr1m TmmE. INCrur.L S01-UtoOrUcol iao UPiNO u1/45T,5 , DATE: CO ,24 -68 SIGNATURE OF DIKSTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 . 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET rf® o REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ( 1-k `1-1.4, ' DATE CIRCULATED: 6/1 r,/88 COMMENTS DUE: •/29 #4,44_EFC - Oar)* - 88 4kh _ °�APPLICATION NO(S). : Rezone 045-88 '/�+,, mo Zvi. PROPONENT: Jodi L. Thompson PROJECT TITLE: Thompson RP7one BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Rezone .329 acres of property from R-2, low nensity Residential Use, to R-3 Medium Density Residential Use. Property includes site currently developed with two dupt un s. This is a non-project, programmatic rezone: however, the applicant's stated intent is to add WIL-13P-AAL-44-1P-X—t-0--c-ak,Site Lade the existing duplexes. 1222 & 1224 Kirkland Ave. N.E. SITE AREA: 14,333 /.329 acre BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants / 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare if 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: • • We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have ide tified areas of probable impact or areas where . additional informat(i is neede:• to properly assess this proposal. 4 -11 ; Lio Signature of Direct6r or authorized Representative Date 6-20-S7P Form 4 RENTC,.. BUILDING & ZONING DEPAn r"ANENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 045 - 88 APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE :R-045-88 PROPONENT : JODI L. THOMPSON PROJECT TITLE : THOMPSON REZONE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: REZONE . 329 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM..R-2 , LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL USE., TQ. R-3 ,. MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL USE. PROPERTY INCLUDES SITE CURRENTLY DEVELOPED WITH TWO DUPLEX UNITS . THIS . IS A NON-PROJECT, PROGRAMMATIC RE' ON ' : HOWEVER, THE APPLICANT ' S STATED INTENT IS TO AD5 TWO NETT +T - .LEX THE LOCATION : SITE & TO UPGRADE THE EXISTING DUPLEX- LOCATED AT 1222 & 1224 KIRKLAND AVENUE N.E . ES . TO : Ell PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : El ENGINEERING DIVISION n TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : r4 UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT n POLICE DEPARTMENT n POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED ' IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON JUNE 29 1988 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Orl.L/ry ,EA/6-/A .E-,E'E n APPROVED X' APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS FA NOT APPROVED • ,�,,�.ZD'A,l.E OWL)' " UTiLl1Y APPROVAL swECT'T J v LATE COMERS AGREEMENT-tri-Jr:€t Lit/0 F LATE CORERS AGREEMENT-SEWER j SYSTEM DE IELOPMERT CHARGE-WATER }/,ES /�$;°®�et7�'�r r wf-k i/u.�c y 2 y$700•eO T SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-SEWER yEs J'Jt. '2 ) tz,,,u2t, 8f goo " `r A' SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE-WATER go 4/z/0€ oo - SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE-SEWER IVD APPROVED WATER PLAN , APPROVED SEWER PLAN Amapa.- APPROVED FIRE HYDRANT LOCATIONS , �.�BY FIRE DEPr. . Yesik FIRE FLEW ANALYSIS DATE: (1,/ 7 her SIGNATURE F DIRE TOR R AU HORIZED REPRESENTATIVE 6-2o.PPrik REVISION 5/1982 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET 4`>G a �� REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Intel s�®i ��< '� 2 i, • DATE CIRCULATED: CO FAT UE , 6/2y/88 �d' 6/15/88 r f�l'i7E ElN C�„-ayi���u�� �' ,f4) .!kt EFC - par; - 88 CITY OF RENTON ®� APPLICATION NO(S). : Rezone 045-88 1W 1' 5 1988 94 PROPONENT: c.an E c C��i rc' p U`�� E B S ao�i PROJECT TITLE: Thompson Rezone BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Re7nne .329 acres of prnpPrty from R-2, low nencity Residential Use, to R-3 Medium Density Residential Use. Property includes site curreoLly developed with two duplex units.` ' This is a non-project, programmatic rezone; however, the applicant's stated intent is to add - site Iltdowade the existing duplexes. 1222 & 1224 Kirkland Ave. N.E. SITE AREA: ' 14,333 /.329 acre BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air L./ 3) Water 1/ 4) Plants 5) Animals r/ 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing +� 10) Aesthetics ✓/ 11) Light and Glare ./ 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation f 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: • We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional info ation is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signatur10/2r of irector r Au horized Representative ` F --- p entative Date • Form A ►' 4 RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT c DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 045 - 88 APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE :R-045-88 PROPONENT : JODI L. THOMPSON PROJECT TITLE : THOMPSON REZONE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:. REZONE . 329 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM..R-2 , LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL USE., TO..R-3 ,. DIUTvt.DENSITY RESIDENTIAL USE. PROPERTY INCLUDES SITE CURRENTLY DEVELOPED WITH TWO DUPLEX UNITS . THIS . IS A NON-PROJECT, PROGRAMMATIC REZONE : HOWEVER, THE APPLICANT' S STATED INTENT IS TO A . T, 4-PLEX TO THE LOCATION : SITE & TO UPGRADE THE EXISTING DUPLEX- LOCATED AT 1222 & 1224 KIRKLAND AVENUE N.E . ES. TO: 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 'ENGINEERING DIVISION riTRAFFIC ENG, DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : OUtILITIES ENG., DIVISION F-1 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU OPARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT OBUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT n POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OOTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED ' IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P .M. ON JTUNE 29, 198R REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : OAPPROVED n APPROVED WITH DITIONS TNOT APPROVED 46) iordv,,,g., r_ fi„, 64...-T, f,st 7- • Cam- Ac" k.r TE: SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE • REVISION 5/1982 t 1 . �p\ 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET674. rt /,, REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: TratiL 11 / cP / ` irg DATE CIRCULATED: 6/15/88 CObfirJE'M7=S=LD,UE: i L�E6,.r"t2't r,'8 ��,�. 9(Q� CITYOF REiaTON EFC - flLU - R8 ® APPLICATION NO(S). : Rezone 045-88 '5 J U L i 5 1988 �, /X/ PROPONENT: Jodi L. Thompson I Pl E C E U E PROJECT TITLE: Thompson RP7one BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: RP7one .329 acres of prnperty frnm R-2, low Density Residential Use, to R-3 Medium Density Residential Use. Property includes site ourrenLly developed with two dupla units.` ' . This is a non-project, programmatic rezone; however, the applicant's stater) intent is to add - • site dpr;ade the existing duplexes. 1222 & 1224 Kirkland Ave. N.E. SITE AREA: 14,333 /.329 acre BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air v 3) Water 4) Plants • z 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing Lam. 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: St r I� Lf ,-&-, s E �, N,E, 13 Y ST/7 P. • We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized-' epresentative Date Form a . • RENTON.BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT ( DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 045 - 88 APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE :R-045-88 PROPONENT : JODI L. THOMPSON PROJECT TITLE : THOMPSON REZONE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: REZONE . 329 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM..R-2 , LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL USE., TO..R-3 ,. MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL USE. PROPERTY INCLUDES SITE CURRENTLY DEVELOPED WITH TWO DUPLEX UNITS. THIS IS A NON-PROJECT, PROGRAMMATIC REZONE : HOWEVER, THE APPLICANT' S STATED INTENT IS TO ADD 'IRO NEW 4-PLEX TO THE LOCATION : SITE & TO UPGRADE THE EXISTING DUPLEX- LOCATED AT 1222 & 1224 KIRKLAND AVENUE N.E. ES. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : OUTILITIES ENG . DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT fl BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OOTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED ' IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P .M. ON JUNF 29, 1988 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : <-z APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS fiNOT APPROVED d e-s." d"'" C,',4 A yy 5-5 ��� DATE: 7/ii SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AberHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE V REVISION 5/1982 • 4eibk 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET NA . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Vojks ar4 Re.c VEttv\-(mk 414, e/ DATE CIRCULATED: 6/15/88COMMENTS DUE: 6/29/8r6l ' 4) 44i5 �,+� 1� EFC - OQti - - 88 '�? 86 0 APPLICATION NO(S). : Rezone 045-88 ��r PROPONENT: Jodi L. Thompson PROJECT TITLE: Thompson Re7nne BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: RP7one .329 acres of property from R-2, low Density Residential Use, to R-3 Medium Density Residential Use. Property includes site LurrenLly developed with two dup'tex units.' ' This is a non-project, programmatic rezone; however. the applicant's stated intent is to add two new 4-nlex to , th site iota ,ade the existing duplexes. 1222 & 1224 Kirkland Ave. N.E. SITE AREA: 14,333 /.329 acre BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2). Air 3) Water • 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources : 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics _ )(k, 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: -ice,/, ajz.---4.0-0/aI/e /'wore heel ee c /( // 6 e-• /!?cre tjea //dLULvC/" d,f de/Are ea,j iicrcere /°'1d- /4 hhel %ort i/e �e/1`�e74r /svec& u e S / a,I 6vi1d�i reff - herd 720 6e fare#46ll/ ithened atted exe«/e..oC a6A Cu e OL 4Cifr.4 w!rJ�f We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. p--A4e 21; 1f.r•� Sign !,r of Director or Authorized Representative Date Form 4 • RENTOIi DUILDING & ZONING DEPAR r MENT4F DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW S® J ` � � Pil ., y febECF - 045 - 88 ,p APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE :R-045-88 PROPONENT: JODI L. THOMPSON PROJECT TITLE : THOMPSON REZONE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: REZONE . 329 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM...R-2 , LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL USE.,, TO..R-3 ,. MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL USE. PROPERTY INCLUDES SITE CURRENTLY DEVELOPED WITH TWO DUPLEX UNITS . THIS IS A NON-PROJECT,p� PROGRAMMATIC REZONE : HOWEVER, THE APPLICANT' S STATED INTENT IS TO ADD TWO NEW 4-PLEX TO THE LOCATION : SITE & TO UPGRADE THE EXISTING DUPLEX- LOCATED AT 1222 & 1224 KIRKLAND AVENUE N.E. ES. TO : El PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : OENGINEERING DIVISION F-1 TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : n UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU �,�/ PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT OBUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT OPOLICE DEPARTMENT OPOLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1-10THERS : . COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED ' IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M. ON JUNE 29, 1988 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 11424/ /[mac,- '7` G APPROVED [21 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 0 NOT APPROVED 4kaee6 dt ee f ,if-/i QSSe 7'h c lrrzcw,l'rl d llde,erl e de✓ >1(C r 1e& j/�6/-,Qil Tt e Q'e,frn,M1/ 4-. G4`e '/ r-r/e /940n( ' a/ ‘(„/liereafWe, 74'ic" 9eil, ;Ace G1�rGLrU ion ri apt `✓ / eew- thoddy f1 w 4 74 /f,11P-s the l'Je!rh�ee--dUae,( e, I recx7'L DATE: (ire 21/y7"` SIGNAT OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 cry _ CITY OF RENTON 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REC" FI ,FD REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: �el� �. jj n,�yy� y► ,. DATE CIRCULATED: --�6/15/88 COMMENTS DUE:mi,642 /,88 -. EFC - 0L - 88 ro)BUILd111C 7 g! 0�. i DEPT. APPLICATION NO(S). : Rezone 045-88 J U N 1 4 1988 I PROPONENT: Jodi L. Thompson t1� C II Phi PROJECT TITLE: Thompson RP7one BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: RP7one .329 acrec of property from R-2, low nencity Residential Use, to R-3 Medium Density Residential Use. Property includes site currently develuped with two duplex units.` This is a non-project, programmatic re7one: however, the applic-ant'c ctated intent is to add two new 4 lex to litaagade the existing duplexes. 1222 & 1224 Kirkland Ave. N.E. SITE AREA: 14,331 /.329 acre BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water k 4) Plants Y 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use �( 9) Housing X, 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation • 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: A-Le-c6 j .n iil, pe-ce../ aeh.e-find ow -ALL A. pvt. Cam. Ot4.0.4.r=4 . Ja-4 1 S-k,,,., --)LQ-I143/ /2-Lt I We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional info tion is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Form 4 RENTOn BUILDING & ZONING DEPA ©' E ;1n DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 045 - 88 APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE :R-045-88 PROPONENT : JODI L. THOMPSON PROJECT TITLE : THOMPSON REZONE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: REZONE . 329 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM..R-2 , LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL USE., TO..R-3 ,. MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL USE. PROPERTY INCLUDES SITE CURRENTLY DEVELOPED WITH TWO DUPLEX UNITS. THIS • IS A NON-PROJECT, PROGRAMMATIC REZONE : HOWEVER, THE APPLICANT'S STATED INTENT IS TO An TWO NEW 4-PLEX TO THE LOCATION : SITE & TO UPGRADE THE EXISTING DUPLEX- LOCATED AT 1222 & 1224 KIRKLAND AVENUE N.E. ES. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : ENGINEERING DIVISION OTRAFFIC ENG, DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : OUTILITIES ENG , DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU OPARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT OBUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT OPOLICE DEPARTMENT OPOLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED ' IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M. ON JUNF 29, 1988 , REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 1-)4„._,„, 1- 2� Ylik ® APPROVED OAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS fl NOT APPROVED 64- comic -oe 141 / • 14) o_e,e A DATE: f��. )� SIGNATURE DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 . OC>1). 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: u,;,\. L( 44 c/ °44.10 DATE CIRCULATED: 6/15/88 ' 4' 40'1/ COMMENTS DUE: 6/2wt EFC - pati - 88 -tp R9, APPLICATION NO S . : Rezone 045-88 As�i PROPONENT: Jodi L. Thompson v PROJECT TITLE: Thompson RP7onP ' BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Re7one .329 acres of prnperty from R-2, low nensity Residential Use, to R-3 Medium Density Residential Use. Property includes site curreriLly developed with two dupi units.` ' This is a non-project, programmatic rezone; however. the applicant 's staters intent is to add two new 4-p-1-e �1.L72site Ilauwade the existing duplexes. 1222 & 1224 Kirkland Ave. N.E. SITE AREA: 14,333 /.329 acre BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing • 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: • We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional . ormation is needed to properly assess this proposal. Sir ua a of Director or Authorized Representative Date Fnrm A • • RENTOri BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 045 - 88 APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE :R-045-88 PROPONENT : JODI L. THOMPSON PROJECT TITLE : THOMPSON REZONE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: REZONE . 329 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM...R-2 , LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL USE., TO..R-3 ,. MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL USE. PROPERTY INCLUDES SITE CURRENTLY DEVELOPED WITH TWO DUPLEX UNITS . THIS IS A NON-PROJECT, PROGRAMMATIC 1 'LDNE : HOWEVER, THE APPLICANT'S STATED INTENT IS TO ADD TWO NEW 4-PLEX TO THE LOCATION : SITE & TO UPGRADE THE EXISTING DUPLEX- LOCATED AT 1222 & 1224 KIRKLAND AVENUE N.E . ES, TO: 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : OENGINEERING DIVISION OTRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU OPARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BU I LDI I G & ZONING DEPARTMENT OPOLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 00THERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED ' IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P .M, ON JUNE 29 19RR REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : ?e-- -a • APPROVED n APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS n NOT APPROVED C- DATE: SIGN R /OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 • 2149N ' ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SH .�." ° OC "J- , 4::k �b. Or4i,r REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: fire.e. fG�va4 w. /,AA /1// • DATE CIRCULATED: 6/15/88 COMMENTS DUE: 6/29/80 4 1 EFC - ,� ,• `� � - - "ems . 401 ��+,r 8 n4'- 88 APPLICATION NO(S). : Rezone 045-88 ' ��� � �� `g'`� , N0 PROPONENT: 111 t e' A �� Jodi L. Thompson Aj. PROJECT TITLE: Thompson RP7onP BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Re7nnP .329 acres of property from R-2, low Tensity Residential Use, to R-3 Medium Density Residential Use. Property includes site cur-r:enLly developed with two dupl"a units.` ' this is anon-project, programmatic • rezone; however, the applicant's stated intent is to add two nevi 4- lex tn_.th site AjWagade the existing duplexes. 1222 & 1224 Kirkland Ave. N.E. SITE AREA: 14,333 /.329 acre BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR .INFORMATION • 0 IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air • 3) Water • 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing • 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation • 14) Transportation . 15) Public Services ,/ 16) Utilities COMMENTS: • • • • We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. dezie-e /J /9",Y • Signa ure of Director or Authorized Representative to Form A -4 w RENTL-._ BUILDING & ZONING DEPA.,�-. MENT ,, DEVELOPMENTS APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET "F _ 045 _ 88 ',f :f'PLICATION NO(S) : REZONE :R-045-88 , 'PROPONENT : JODI L. THOMPSON r PROJECT TITLE : THOMPSON REZONE F_ BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: REZONE .329 ACRES OF. PROPERTY FROM..R-2 , LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL USE., TO..R-3 ,. .MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL USE. PROPERTY INCLUDES SITE CURRENTLY DEVELOPED WITH TWO DUPLEX UNITS . THIS . IS A NON-PROJECT, PROGRAMMATIC REZONE : HOWEVER., THE APPLICANT' S .STATED INTENT IS TO ADD TWO NEW 4-PLEX TO THE LOCATION : SITE & TO UPGRADE THE EXISTING DUPLEX- LOCATED AT 1222 & 1224 KIRKLAND AVENUE N.E. ES . TO : 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 0 ENGINEERING DIVISION n TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU OPARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT El BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT • OPOLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED ' IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P ,M, ON JUNE 79, 198R REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVI ION : Fire rpfexier1'6611 OAPPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 0 NOT APPROVED Any development and/or construction shall comply with current Fire and Building Codes and Ordi- nances. A second means of approved access is required. Fire Department access roads/lanes shall be paved minimum width 20'; minimum height 13' 6". Yes,.__._,. ko Preliminary fire flow calculation show a fire fl,w , hf O . CiA472,04rAti is required dig-6- hydria;iL ..ii.>1 a iEinirra,i'di f :': of 1 ' ' .gem each is required. • Primary .hydrant is required to be.within e. 'o' . ,,......,.V,.W.�....,;,�.,feet.of the structure. Secondary hydrants are required to be within -� 0o . N .feet of the structure. An approved automatic sprinkler system is required tO protect the total structure. Yes o All fire department access roads are to be paved and installed prior to construction; Yes No— All fire hydrants are required to be installed and approved prior to CO:isituct.in. Yes No DATE: SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE . fEVI&ION 5/1982 • 11-cY" o 1f- .TY OF RENTO' T FILE NO(S): -'p '- 8) BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT EcrJ Dog 66 a MASTER APPLICATION . . NOTE TO APPLICANT: Since this is a comprehensive application form, only those items; related to your specific type of application(s) are to be. completed. J (Please print or type. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) APPLICANT S • TYPE OF APPLICATION NAME FEES Too/ L. • T61oMPSON o i i co. REZONE*(FROM R-Z TO /Z-3 ) d. ADDRESS .I 682.o s/ $r. AcVG", SO. • 0 SPECIAL PERMIT* ' CITY ZIP 0 TEMPORARY PERMIT* S LGA-rrE6 1 W;4 98//8 Q CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT* TELEPHONE • ' • SITE PLAN APPROVAL Q SPECIAL PERMIT FOR GRADE AND FILL 723 '3 36 No. of Cubic Yards: CONTACT PERSON ' Ct. VAFroNCSe *` . From Section: * Justification'Required. NAME LAWiZ4WGC Ai. CA-M l36-6L. a ADDRESS SUBDIVISIONS: , ED I 07 5o. C6wr/z.4-1 c AVe, J)frE.4 l SHORT PLAT CITY ZIP Q TENTATIVE PLAT /<.6`v T( WA Cf 803 Z Q PRELIMINARY PLAT TELEPHONE 0 FINAL PLAT 85-1-- 2-14-7® El WAIVER (Justification Required) FOWNER NO..OF LOTS: NAME PLAT NAME: TO 0/ L, TRto/'/PSaf ADDRESS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: 69 _,0 57 si .,4 v6, So, Q PRELIMINARY CITY .3 .i A-7 7"�C/ WA 719118 ZIP FINAL P.U.D. NAME: TELEPHONE Z Z 3 3 1 3 1' Q Residential Q Industrial Commercial El Mixed LOCATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: PROPERTY ADDRESS 0 ZZ.Z 4 l Z 2,,t_• kbut 4eA".0 A-V6. N. E . 0 TENTATIVE EXISTING USE PRESENT ZONING CD PRELIMINARY l ea. DUPeeX UAJ f 7- R --a• L__.J FINAL PROPOSED USE PARK NAME: AhPO / ea, . .- /'66l ON/t TV 3 e 7-' NUMBER OF SPACES: r ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE CA °- 0 SQ. FT. ACRESUzi" AREA: /1-/ 3 3 3 0. 3Z7 R y�J N, 4 2691 TOTAL FEES 9)(1)2 CITY OF REN ATM F USE ONLY -- ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING DATE hIPIE D APPLICATION RECEIVED BY: �� `�'j ���261988 APPLZCf�TION DETERMINED TO BE: 42/ 1hGo�Ji Accepted 0 Incomplete Notification Sent On By: (Initials),aL.fnINC !,,13CN:nn DE PT. DATE ROUTED ADDITIONAL MATERIAL RECEIVED BY: APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: CO " 15 - ED 0 Accepted 0 Incomplete Notification Sent On By: (Initials) ROUTED TO: IN Building (.21 Design Eng. �4 Fire 0 Parks I1 Police MI Policy Dev. M Traffic Eng. 031 Utilities REVISED 1=31-84 Legal description of property (if more,space is required, attach a separate sheet). L_o-1' II Stook 11 Govvec-J-ive Pla4, •1(9• 2 aGGov3v‘o 40 pia-4 rec..ov.Aed ! Vol . 57 0--P p1ot.4-5 poles 92"9 S ) )fri K i' j 60L l SAS iH�j1 i j e�-� �h e easTe'v/v ea° , ee'(• • Coo t Carl-' 0-P 104 /, B 100 k I I / ekovs,"44ve P1 , R47,4 4011 -- - y 17 I4vl d 5 A/0. 2 / a.CCo v ;110 70 - e, p/ar`T rieco vci J "i fd/. S7 a 1a� , /2Ot �s 92 , 98 ���lr�S/'Ye /h �/'H Gouv,r Ii/a54/t,L . `Te eJ4ev c1)411 oiv, eas-e.1 1 1 ress , eovess a /47�/''/i h'es ov-ei/ -!'1i �I1owl�I� c escvib-ed+ frotadi cr'/ i lov+li tAtes4 covheV o e above. J e cc /bec ; soN-frh ditoj wes+ Me- nov4 4c) ,Peo. j -/j ems L cceet d-o' • -1-1/14e, p oui O"r IC7e o/N41%19 Q. AFFIDAVIT ,,)02.e.,a 4,4,4 /5 1, „lob,' G, 745i ' o 4y i/a,) E) r4sri;° being duly sworn, declare that I am authorized representative to act for the property ownerrowner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFOREC- ME THIS • �4 DAY . OF Octe"U-f"_ 19( 7 . NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, RESIDING y; AT • • ( e of Notary Public) (Signature of Owner) ao,.q ��,�� (Address) Cam)''^- -Q-f-� C 6 7 (Address) • (City) -(State) fj .(Z p')> , C;09 7c7.23---.?/_/4" (Telephone) Acceptance of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete application. Plans and other materials required to constitute a complete application are listed in the "Application Procedure." Foxm #174 JUSTIFICATION FOR THE REZONE The rezone of the subject property from R-2 to R-3 would' be appropriate because it will bring the property into conformity with the Ci.Ly of Renton's Comprehensive Plan for this particular site. (Refer to attached comprehensive plan, Sheet A-2). The existing housing in the area is mostly duplex type units, with 4--plex units inter-mingled with them. Across the streets to the north and west, 4-plex and duplex units exist, which give a mirror image along both streets (in terms of land use) to our proposal. It is our intent then to build a new 4-plex townhouse type unit as well as to upgrade the existing duplex unit currently on the site, which, as a result, will hopefully encourage others in the neighborhood to also upgrade their buildings. The quality of housing is one of our concerns, so the design of the new structure will meet the Washington State Energy Code and also take advantage of common walls between units to further reduce energy consumption. The design and arrangement of the building will allow all dwelling units to take advantage of the common open space which will be oriented generally to the southerly area of the site. The site is convenient for future residential construction because all re- quired utilities are in place and operational, such as water, sewer, tele- phone and electricity. The site is also in an excellent location for access to all conveniences for the residents. It is adjacent to a commercial shopping area and is within two blocks of banking and post office facilities. One block to the east is Sunset Boulevard, an arterial that offers residents access to Metro Bus services. In reference to housing density objectives, (stated in the Compendium for the City of Renton, dated January 1985) our proposed medium density multi- family housing will serve as a buffer between the duplex (low density, multi- family) type unit to the west and the commercial area to the east. In order to reduce any negative impacts this development might have on the surrounding area, the proposed 4-plex unit will be wood framed, and of a residential scale common to the surrounding area. In conclusion, we believe that the rezone of this parcel to R-3 is not only justifiable but quite desirable. In concept it will match the housing pattern that currently exists on the opposite side of the streets to the north and west. As stated previously, the rezone of this parcel will bring it into conformity with the comprehensive plan for this specific area. CITY OF RENTON RECEIVED MAY 2 61988 BUILDING/ZON!NG DEPT. i 'F..`4i)•� {„: �s. •\ ,...4, � .n.0 erne RAnWV IV■RUV JIl■wr• �, +;,a?'^i r41".• • ,;, .. • Fir irnerican Title .. ,;:}t•;4 F�; `,',A ,. IN----ANCE . C M A I r, �'vtt ryc� j. L • .f�r• • ti`5i7;i nt Filed for Record of ::::::ti: 'v` ; 4�t f i 4. . Request of o o' a.a.. . ii 7.. #gec • f,...,,..}c • . ' �1�.�4. Name J b... •..••:....••-•.....-•i ji•»•St.. . 92/07/14 N06 E s RECD F 3.00 ),• 1pp k,.A,:rci,, Addreu... C.e&......00K .46.L. . n............................. 3.................... ...... 22 ' t " >F XIf'y I . n45; � ‘;',.'SA ,a ff � ;, ,,� Quit Claim Deed 1 A ij' THE GRANTOR F. TiTew. sta.v ' . - i", Wf� 1144 $ i for and in consideration of ,u 4 eh.,0 i� + 1,.; rot*J a ! rrr,"y 0 AltAr g�pC�A 1rIO,tJ tk /�/ ,• qt t�:..:„' ?`g;, ; '�,p.�! #i conveys and quit claims to Job L.. �Oareseiv_ A s;a«7ie �C►Orw✓ `j ' t , t 'ale »,d f t�%;.y;3 ,, • the following described real estate, situated in the County of State of Washington, r,- �0.. . V. 1P.,:. together with all after acquired title of the`rantor(s) therein`' 'd 4 µa;?r �C't.�q • a, ! � °`") r#it�,'''; . //yy di AvIvoatN or t /2 2 2 40'/.2.2 c/ 41,41,y401w 42e.. tyr i �,'� a',:i. y k'+ail r T� 'rf. /� i 41 }.- , ',;n'i f ,4 "Re4vet4! IV A S K r.v Y fl '. fit'.. l,/ ,t='�'�"4;Iiit,i'. `��, t .�' r � re. ev( pia"- iQnnct�� �9 /iw►®s AA 2 t n,.z¢r,!r"h`to • c F `. Lb4; a obvi * phree°/de1 'Ai L�S7e phi/ Eitf''y+ ,h, ;L- t , 1 _ ' �. tg , 9 9r .. . (30A, u)��QIN,b P�V�t . Ntrr,,rYi .# : ''',VA!4-J.i Fk'. i� "x9 s x..;x.--; ::, .,, NIV AX cl; A • . :. ,‘,.1'60..,',4`?.4i':=.10,t t t '1 t4.- 1155'.°'t,F3-d. t t`5'•ti :j Y1` �� • v a � , Dated this l day ofiY, ,(_}(,/� i ;putt' 4. 6f-11 t • 1 �a• . ...//...,., rL.. .�}..�. w..r�. . _' '4 L P Gk aMT ,sX• • ..».+......—..mow--..�..... i'`4...V ` . F' , '� ' ' • ( 1. grr- k'7 t K ,v,,., %jSiSTE OF WASHINGTON. t{w + y • County of ilia— 1 •( � , r t a� On this daypersonally ■ neared before me t ," k?t.• �4 ;� p f/Ul� /�Yd�t� C—, ��j l�wrSD>t� y • yt,Y�;<+ , #, �it, yti ;,' Y_n�,t ,•.,; to me known to be t e individual described in and who.executed the within and foregoing instrument. and �, , 33'a ' `: �'• acknowk that slimed . ;P: Z4 Ni; ged geed the same as / .s free and voluntary act and deed.for the ,'.,., r' uses and purposes Tn mentioned. t '` ';y* ?z'<r, CITY CF RENTO?I .� r „.6 vb GIVEN uk ! F� a tom► day of .QY • 1 r -1 ;a '� 51-r^ ')' p/j nn�J ° (r� JO V ►Y PM in end •►Me to of pas 1' .'r i 1 '4t.,t-':5+.'i r' •,. It l!1 2 u 1988 „residing et +� .�' ti q y BUILDING/ ON!N� DEPT. ,� {� i eJA es ' rV Britt � 1:Y..J, i 3{ ;,,,.,,„,„,. , .., r � ,,�_ �t� ; Fir- 14merte8� Title ` �• u� 3 J t�: : . �s� 'n.: IN. ANCE COMPANY,. I • i '`' 4;,,T4,, 'z ''` Rod for;Record at Request ufcig �j '� } " `;�'^ '0,3 gli I wt9 t 44, '�;��',I Name �Q�t.{ e,,.. � RECD F 3.co `� 's�;� �. t "h ' } IliCASFISL *�*3.;00 xTt aa,h # '' a: Y F�; Addna.•.J.�Y, *.Q176 .s.,•,i ge,-?If„ «,.« .�. Z2 1 ; ��k fl* . Ili • y Z City.ad'ale. awls•rl fr• Il. l n�. i....•««....«•..... , t'?' '` i to ,a%°s 7 77s w '? kiiii,24i , kl , '��' ' Quit Claim Dead y J. ` i �v ',?., 4 THE GRANTOR ��L dam✓ EXCI ai '''' .. • • _,,t,,d _i, f..4.,u; ,, lit....,,,,,-;..,.. .... „? for and in corolderation of �0 CON*eO ,Q ��yy'11 JUL4 "t`-"+''';,i,. `s ( i R conveys and quit claims to,�j s ; b...a ,,, the followingdescribed real estate, situated in the Countyof `' State of Washington, . a3�i �� � ! together with all after acquired tide of the grantor(s) therein: 7' y ,��'���.,�' Y / t pit,'1 i. 44,+ • iy�4 -itV14 9y (, SIlS$$`-i7�11}.,.:. "3.\ rat''; t •i[' / /0 / L DD ...;Y,p ,}` qi,,'s,; ,. ' /AtaeN, 0OI roe leOpA,e Rom! �/'44. �' r,i' ''ar�� ,t, ,�,;z4; / aS`JaY� :« £ / /I Pe'bCA /N ski. S/�B /� h ' i v,ftf„q-�,t r Fk:-.44 y` :, .l� tK/ /N/EiNI �L•!y' (LJ�e`�,.w.:,-/ :; ., .{ f. ..'.s; r a s°�5 ,r' r lu/ q.tJ fp.�0ivJ.v7� / at :' t� < aid { i� N /� ` A 4,- AT. p���ss'gvtOq/../..fvsow,- IF `tiar ' ��tt� F'.�'kt ``• ks9®rip j►• �p/Ni{I.N.'A Q r_ �4 0MIr71 ✓�r #,�i.r} �d&�{ c � 1� �y y� r �/ ^ �/t,`-? " et 4OvC I►�SC•rr�Apr/ "/ i j �Il> � 701 TJV r"�. :�� �,,*''�� O r Nf� o Nct ? ;, ;.{�}},,tir M S� 7r� wI�J' .ve /vOr C�t� OVID � 7�r 7� kJ r4",,,, ,1,•% .l.. lam"` ' ?� 6,�, ,,, o ,, l,a k If- .+; `"al t w ,k wt Lam, >ft.i rF k 91 pily .,�, R at fiu�s 4: ; i� is� 4} ' k� t r,> t Dated this ))� 1, � 5 rt,5 ..,,:. J / day of ;Pe Y /a1Z-e/? . 4„ t`,� -Ia. .-. ,, '', n• s STATE OF WASHINGTON• ~ ' ' y; ' . apt . ` ,. < �4 tr ar . tKit3 County of ✓/�(j— J �� Y�y v�n�r- ,�S a Fj?' ` On this day personally appeared before me /� s r 4t x fi ,�4 to me known to he the Indk'idual described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and . '¢itLrt 1 , };" +4``` '"' acknowle that 4a' '' _'.„'',,�j i, mentioned. d the same u 4 free and voluntary act and deed,for the q : , uses and purposes therein mentioned. / S t k'' '2 r `Ir, t• CIVENcrTd`� ci n / a Ya.}M1 ' r � �offkial seal thb�f day of lt'!/�M i C ;19 r� ' +� ' d Jj j t ^ S.i `l 7tt"tl L"��'7 ,' �.�, .^ �..44{ .4... }' i i f rr Pnbik . of the State o/IssAi `' �3<," .V -0 .r s 4 WA_„ MAY 2 6 988 nntlinast• s,�e''.r� � '` /d"tq c , vo . rerr 4.,, •P 0.• I,. iii-, • . . '6,1, ./4 /.,,,t '1, ... ,„ $� 'J 1987 COPYRIGHT BY WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE REGISTER INC SEATTLE WASHINGTON (206) 282-3359. WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE REGISTER BELIEVES THE INFORMATION BEL6W TO BE CORRECT, BUT DOES NoT WARRANT ITS ACCURACY. THIS INFORMATION IS LEASED FROM AND REMAINS THE PROPERTY OF WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE REGISTER, INC. -N KING COUNTY PARCEL DIST 9 Qt�N-T Y AC� _�17�11RAT P� T 1987-MA21110N 722780-RENTON HIGHLANDS 8 2 CORRECT PLATRENTON VOL 57 PG 92 ,R ACCT-NO OWNER NAME SITUS ADDRESS LEVY 1 USE UN SALE-DATE PRICE LAND IMP TOTAL-Av •STY SOFT YR A W MAILING ADDRESS IST*W_: G ___1::_R LEGAL QEScRi i1ON Y_ A w 2EL 87TAX ACR� 2 0240-0581 LAFRANCHIA M -1i'' KIRKIAND AV NE�-_ 2100 2 10� 2 24.300 26.000 50,300 2481.0 1440543 801 GRANT AVE VICTORON WA 98055 _ 4*9 U-SW-04-2ss-oo5 ,2 0245 UFM 5 RP 1:�•, KIRKLANO AV NE 2100 2 1_0?~2 830331 59,950 24,300 34.100 58 400 1.0 1750 43 C 21 SW 1 3R0 ST*SEATTLE W 98166 1*10 U-SW-04-2 5 7�5.94 .18 2 0250-02 KOVACH LESTER i JOANNE K 3109 NE 14TH ST 2100 2 103 3 780628 49.500 24,300 49,200 73 22808.82 861 0 10017 191ST ST E / TALL FIRS*PUYALLUP WA 98373 2*10 U-SW-04-23-05 -.-2 0255-07 WEEKS STANLEY E 3100 NE 13TH ST 2100 3 104 4 77081b 67.500 27,600 97,700 125 300 NE 17031 N SHR FAD*TAHUYA WA 98588 3*10 U-SW-04-23-05 1600.46 .21 :-2. 0260-00 HALLESY HAROLD W 1318 KIRKLAND AV NE 2100 2 SOZ 2 810310 56,000 24,300 34,500 58,800 1.0 1750 43 - 4741 SCU°ERSET DR SE*BELLEVUE WA 98006 4*10 U-SW-04-2 5 751.05 .20 O -- 0265-05 THOMPSt4 WELDON E 1222 KIRKLAND AV NE 2100 2 ��022 2 780303 30,000 24.300 31.400 57i70061.0 1442043 - 6715 5 THAYER*SEATTLE WA 98178 1*11 U-SW-04-23-05 LESS ELY 60 FT 2 10266-04 THOmPSON WELDON 2100 2 901 741024 1.500 15,000 0 15 000 528 RAINIER AVE S R36*RENTON WA 98055 1*11 U-SW-04-23-05 ELY 60 FT1YR 191.59 .13 a .- 0270-08 VANDERMAY RICHARD L.HEIDI 9 1214 KIRKLAND AV NE 2100 2 10 2 860317 57.000 24,300 35,800 60,100 1.0 151067.66 143 1216 KIRKLAND AVE N*RENTON WA 8056 2*11 U-SW-04-23-OSOc - 0275-03 DANIELSON LESTER I 1208 KIRKLAND AV NE 2100 2 1_02 2 730924 24,300 33.100 57 400 1.0 1440 43 - 2204 NE 24TH ST*RENTON WA 98055 3*11 U-SW-04-2s3-005 7�3.17 .33 0( - 0280-06 DANIELSON LESTER I 3030 NE 12TH ST 2100 6 1022 2 31,000 21.700 52,700 1.0 1440 43 WA 2 2204 NE 24TH ST*RENTON98055 4*11 U-SW-04-23-0S LESS POR TO CITY 6/3.14 .20 2100MX 0285-01 THE SOUTHLMD CCORP 3002 SUNSET g�, NE 2100 5 3-0 760202 38.504 110.500 64.800 175 300 0. 0. 2 Y TAX DEPT 18951*2828 NORTH HASICELL*DALLAS TX 75204 11A* U-NW-09-23-OS LESS S12239.11 .46 p r �i 0425-02 RENTON SCH DIST 403 3000 NE 4TH ST _ co M 2 189 00p 0 189,000 co POR*16A U-SWW-09-23-OS LESS 7TH AVE N CONY AUD S41b641 LESS POR NLY OF SD IO.Qd O, 0426-01 REORGANIZED CH JESUS CHRIST 2100 1 901 1,800 0 1 800 "' "m C-•-d A 2 C/0 J T SIMPSON-REIN 02080-010*4820 S MORGA 98118 POR*16A U-SW-09-23-05 POR SLY 1/2 OF VAC 7TH AVE N NLY OF 7TH AVE N AS DE ,1 J 0450-00 RENTON SCHOOL DIST 403 ----'-' '� `° 435 MAIN AVE S*RENTCN WA 98055 *17 1 3- 39,600 0 39.600 T7 U-SW-09-23-OS LESS ST L POR VAC STS ADJ2.04; hi-_ Qf 0475-0 RENTON SCHOOL DIST 403 210209.12N5 1 qp1 85.500 0 85,500 - " • `` 43 MAIN AVE S*RENTON WA 98055 *18 U-SW-09-23-O5 L POR VAC STS ADJ 4.46 °�`` t 2 0500-00 RENTON SCHOOL DIST 403 3000 NE 4TH ST 2100 9 682 768.000 4,710.900 5,478,900 (?- '" *19-20 U-SW-09-23-O5 LESS ST L POR VAC STS ADJ 14.00 t 0600-09 WHISLER ROBERT J 556 INDEX AV NE 2100 2 ;0-g5 2 790925 75,000 25,200 45.500 701,700 1.0 2210 59 4511 141ST Pt SE*BELLEVUE WA 98006 1*23 U-SW-09-23 903.05 .18 a 0605-04 ROWLEE J L I S S 2907 NE 6TH ST 2100 2 102 2 25.200 31,400 5600 6 1.0 1340 59 5906 47TH AVE SW*SEATTLE WA 98136 2*23 U-SW-09-23-05 7f2.95 .19Oc 0610-07 MILLER ROBERT F 2915 NE 6TH ST 2100 2 SFD 1 �-- 2915 NE 6TH ST*RENTON WA 98055 3*23 U-SW-09-23-05 25.200 22,800YR 46i30001.0 1090856 oc ,1 06 S' i OF R4, A � ECF: I -04 -88 I �% 4 z City of Renton LU: [P-o4g- ,J-7 8� ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 044,fD SEPSE-OQ Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). chapter 43.21 C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for allproposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal. if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the 'questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer. or if a question does not apply to your proposal. write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to,explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impacts. - Use of Checklist for Nonproject Proposals: (Please Type or Print Legibly) Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: CV k IAN\d Avemte, 2. Name of applicant: • .304.i L. --n.v w, o-1 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact-person: 628,20 51 /7 AV1a so. 5 ! vVA. 181I8 • (2010) -723- 31340 4. Date checklist prepared: 9- Ocj-6L ev /967 S. Agency requesting checklist: G 4.1 .� F1- h — euo to n 4 2 '%; t>• v- •-i- 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): S-rUY o CA v\S#U G4-I vv; -- Sp,-i+nok VI . CITY OF RENTO I Er; VED 7Y2 6 1 5B8 . 7. .. Do you have any pla or future additions, expansions, o P. )rther activity related • to or connected with this proposal? if yes, explain. NO y4 B. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. 14Ohe, • 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Sn,i IdL►� peArPvi,-�' , Re—zov,e P_4,4 , viovwiW) l'ca.1 -el-eav-icell vvt%v+s, ow, 5-}v'ee4 '-tce- 0.0.444-1 11. Give brief, complete description of.your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. 9 � -I � q The 7VOG1a5Gv 1 15 Gt frl //rho r�vr ., tM/ NAnti'�t �Lt�'y,l;c� v`-'1 & pvox. -4 Soo-sy. 44 (du,„ ,.as 240-o s �� �,6✓) sr z� cr,c s,+e, is /4,32 9 st 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topography map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. I , '1 P fraposc�/ i s iO d ��, i 2 S•ICU. 1/4 o 42 S-e c. . 9 ^ 4 1J• Iv V4 cj S Q/ -23--5 . I, S!e is Loyd-eve.; tot Ave. .L d , -�1�� tAke4-j J N- L vto V 4 1. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH • a. General description of the site (circle one); CBI, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other _ . b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? /•eSS +h 1 2%, c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, caly, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of.agricultural, soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. . ,v✓d av►� T Y � soy') d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so. describe. Ni cv - 2 - e. Describe the rpose, type, and approximate qu<. :.ies of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. — , 11 ►4oT reljvire . ter - vwL.e'✓ vecl ai�eGS f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. I'1JO g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? • 51.E4/0 h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: 'ffs-1-oYLv1 S-etA,44v S S . 2. AIR a: What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e.1, dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when, the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. veS/ l?ail Ge t4.. a 6--t nv b. Are there any off-site sources of emission? c: Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Omit. re1 Ve2 3. WATER a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what.stream or river it flows into. Do-es ►io 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. 'Does 14.64- o pJ - 3 - 4) Will the pr ;al require surface water withdr s or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximately quantities if known. fin . w 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. 1�1 O 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. 140 b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and appaoximately quantities if known. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals . . .; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. 140 c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. ,fix is -��� s4prim s_ew-ev s 4elAel ►kl pi ac i Ic;+.klktet Avg N I . � atso PLA 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. �o - 4 - d. Proposed me___:es to reduce or control surface, -_jnd, and runoff water impacts, if any: Yeli,v.rect 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: . 'Et" deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen,o herj o evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other t Shrubs grass o crop or grain o Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other o water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other o other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Gts.2 vL�n.-/v p l '7� " pYe bos2dt f /41-1,J pJi i . 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: Hawk, heron, eagle Kongbird-R other Skiiq// Lircis Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Do eS ►10 apIoi vJ - 5 - d. Proposed m ires to preserve or enhance wildlif any: Does &4 -- a"1"pl` . 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufaOturing, etc. lev}rl ,( 4. n�w rS availl1k 4 • b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. 110 c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: �II(�i++l ��I✓l� („ i 1 6e, �-2S� 1� 4 1414, I 1 G-LLY wal,S in t ✓1 f5 4-vin (-6>rt SeVV cil (es k VYI��f�/J . Cl✓1G�Ltct 1r-4 1 A h1 ct 1 J 14 u IA,44 5 Ass Cif 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. 1�10. 1) Describe special e emergency services that might be required. II — pi /f� 5 ke v/ve L rest d etN¢t r ,I Co vt Sv-l1rt t o- , 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: ovi-e- re"vt'rec . b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment,I operation, other)? )) IWOYkt44 ) `�tvee� hoiS.e, 4/!s� // aCCIAVY /bl 11'• Si dew r✓! (t v`eA-S' - 6 - 2) What types a .ovals of.noise would be created b :r associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise, would come from the site. 11 �l I r 6j�oY� 48Yh'l - rio rk icvi GO Ycs 7V .v1-o,• ire ec lo't S-e axj 4-81/14,1 o1vk+1oc / Y'eSi do4-,4oJ wiSE 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: 0014c Ar-e1 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties?o D N�l-e X -GEC trs 4cz av/ LtreS 4— St A-P o.�'" s-e V�SA-- o' c:4f c vve v4 Vth-C- 0 - • films 144,4 9144 i s Pc,.e/oho (.S�vi� of sr-be, . JJ* C4 p-upe✓41-es -- 2..fo4i- So(4'L, avlj I S4- — 1 1ple kowSi�� , — vt4rAill Si-vono,� cdt.lzox b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. "No c. Describe any structures on the site. X 1141410 ctwo 1x `aC A/W cs Sl'�-e. o -P d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? ry e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? R-2, f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? R-3 g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? v Ines �p i o p . h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. • MO i. Approximately how many people would reside- or work in the completed project? ± people. . j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Nb- e .. - 7 - 1. Proposed r iures to ensure the proposal is cc. _,itible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: n proposal LA, �II cofri, ti d-ii w.;43 /601,V 41,451 les-6 14101 1.4'1. jeSi n{(e-5 • ('1 l 9. Housing 611/1 1:2%-3 a. Approximately how many ' units would, be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Apped 3 pro I hk 4 peiss/ k vt,t 5 /A -the l h cowi.e. V e. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate v whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Na v►ee c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Pro 'I 4s halksi;.� 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. e/01/ - 2 31 e4 . (4 pe. 5 Lvo ) cAtio" , b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? I\lI°Nc c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Sire hull\ tow sc n.p.¢4 c-t,w2 . )'5 614 G( ibC l ows i�t (A,/4 • 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? C2t,'y kill/di is iio y 4,// 1^ec, d e(41,: er b. Could light or. glare from the finished .project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No• c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? l. e0 vh 044 ar-A a v!/0 144, j 4'loYts.f.,/I 4vwA✓d H -e pit-1)i°;44 d. Proposed measures to reduce ort'bntrol light and glare impacts, if any: I`t c1l se v-el U.l'V'ect , - 8 - 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? /I;11 ct(s� ich Salad p lJ o yeak d 3'/z bi-o«,kS no- cr.T ►e b.= . Would the.proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: e vel(.4,'vect . • 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation ' ' a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. goes i4Al? . b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to'the site. tees. friA- ci pp)� c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Do-es i1o4 14. Transportation, a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site,•and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Vteci4- ,.cGPSS a kl`Y�G I4.01A A vie- L 4-0 e S-21- G� 'S p1ewl. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximately --- distance to the nearest transit stop? /Bus bhp o.1op0VAx I-2 ►oloo ks sou4kn ec -s4- o (Bus 461) c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? 2 c9,cL's -�v� vGt es-. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). O. - 9 - e. Will the prOct use (or occur in the immediateeinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No • • 'f: ' `How many vehicular trips per day would be' generated 'by 'the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. . /q p v cL C A •ksy�Q,.- l°1444,,,,' .Dep : Peak l4 w'vs— '7: oo —a:oD 414.1 4%30 •+0 5: P1►i Call c.,act. TV✓d, , g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: 1Jome IA ve.1 , • 15; Public Services • a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Ito- �vowld place, la,.'1- be cv++�.ev, a,n s.evv,c.s - let4 war,. lci. 1�e I40Yl,i4 1 Qz AA-tAlvti 'clew--L' b�,,' I� '6�%► -1%le evve .. V`GSr al � 9 IM b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Noll Vey vecl • 16. Utilities a. Cir e utilities current available at the site: gectricity)natural gas, 4612IP refuse service#telephone ,41:11132D septic system, other. So S .Yw� $eyvev. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might.be needed. U*'I eteckvici4ii — Eq P°wV W4A. v 4 Sdv✓wt Sec v� el/— c.4 o C. SIGNATURE . I, the undersigned,'state°.that,to the best of,my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead• agency may withdraw any \declaration of non-significance that it• might issue in reliance'upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: t iD1.� • /i®r.7s 0 e ,�..' , hvie Name Printed: Vnbr f210.5f ) hv we 1r/7iU ; ,� ._ „�o� her A i /� '"`G'-lf- - 10 - #176 11-8-84 a 2149N ENV1RONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: DATE CIRCULATED: 6/15/88 COMMENTS DUE: 6/29/88 EFC - Oaci - 88 APPLICATION NO(S). : Rezone 045-88 PROPONENT: Jodi L. Thompson PROJECT TITLE: Thompson Rezone BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Rezone .329 acres of property from R-2, low nencity__ Residential Use, to R-3 Medium Density Residential Use. Property includesLsite ` `; wo_ ,up. a n _ s,. �_. is is a non-prof ec , programma_ti c rezone;. however, the appl i rant'e ctatarl i ntent i c tCLa�1rl t new a_„1 ex to nth site &, .ade the existing duplexes. 1222 & 1224 Kirkland Ave. N.E. SITE AREA: 14,333 /.329 acre BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Form 4 - RENTO ;BUILDING & ZONING DEPAI-. ;RENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF 045 - 88 APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE :R-045-88 PROPONENT: JODI L. THOMPSON PROJECT TITLE : THOMPSON REZONE BRIEF DESCRIPTION. OF PROJECT: REZONE . 329 ACRES OF. PROPERTY FROM..R-2 , LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL USE., TO. R-3 ,. `MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL USE. PROPERTY INCLUDES SITE CURRENTLY DEVELOPED WITH TWO DUPLEX UNITS. THIS. IS A NON-PROJECT, PROGRAMMATIC REZONE : HOWEVER, THE APPLICANT'S STATED INTENT IS TO ADD TTO NEW 4-PLEX TO THE LOCATION : SITE & TO UPGRADE THE EXISTING IDUPLEX LOCATED AT:.1222 & 1224 KIRKLAND AVENUE N.E. ES . TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : El UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU 0 PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT 0 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT El POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :00 P .M. -ON JUNE 79, 198.8 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : APPROVED El APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS [1] NOT APPROVED DATE: SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982