HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-27-2026 - Fury Site Works Protest Letter - Highlands Reservoir Wtr Main11Page
F
SITE WORKS INC
March 27, 2026
VIA EMAIL ONLY
Ken Srilofung
Project Manager
Public Works Department
CITY OF RENTON
1055 South Grady Way
Renton WA 98055
ksrilofung(a. rentonwa. Azov
RE: Bid Protest
Highlands Reservoir Water Main Improvements Project
Bid Date: 3/25/2026
Dear Mr. Srilofung:
Fury Site Works, Inc. ("FSW") hereby submits this bid protest to the City of Renton regarding the
Highlands Reservoir Water Main Improvements Project ("Project").
FSW submitted a proposal in response to the City's call for bids on the Project. The bids were opened on
March 25, 2026. The bid submitted by the apparent low bidder, Earthworks Solutions, LLC ("Earthworks") did
not conform to the bid requirements and must be deemed nonresponsive. FSW is the next lowest bidder and
should be awarded the Project in accordance with RCW 39.04.
Background Facts.
Bid proposals on the subject project were due on March 25, 2026. FSW timely submitted a proposal in
response to the City of Renton's call for bids. Attachment A. The City conducted a bid opening at 2 pm on
March 25. The bid results were as follows:
1. Earthworks Solutions, LLC
$
6,567,108.39
2. Fury Site Works, Inc.
$
7,441,169.95
3. Roundbush Earthworks
$
7,684,150.12
4. RW Scott Construction
$
7,904,074.01
5. Cecanti
$
8,462,305.26
6. Karvel Construction
$
8,808,971.22
21Page
7. JW Fowler $ 8,955,307.61
8. Goodfellow Bros. $ 8,996,378.13
9. Rodarte $ 9,024,830.50
10. Laser Underground $ 9,372,065.65
Timeliness & Standing.
The City provided bidders with copies of all bids in accordance with RCW 39.04.105. FSW is
submitting this protest on March 27, 2026, within two full business days of receipt of the copies of all bids.
FSW has standing to file this protest as it is the lowest responsive and responsible bidder.
Basis for Protest.
The basis for this bid protest is (1) Earthworks' failure to provide a copy of its certificate of registration;
and (2) Earthworks' failure to provide proof of registration of the electrical subcontractor with whom the
bidder, if awarded the contract, will directly subcontract.
The bidder's proof of registration and proof of certain subcontractors' registration(s) are required by the
City's bid documents and by Washington law. Specifically, the bid documents directed bidders to provide their
own "DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIES CERTIFICATE OF REGISTRATION" as well as a
"SUBCONTRACTOR LIST". See Attachment A. The City's "Bidder's Checklist" states that it is "the
responsibility of each bidder to ascertain if all the documents listed in the attached index are included," and
asks, "Have you submitted the Subcontractor's List and proof of licenses? ... Have you submitted Dept. of
Labor and Industries Certificate of Registration Form?" (Emphasis added.)
In addition, the Specifications include a document entitled, "Subcontractor List To Be Submitted with
the Bid Proposal" which directs bidders: "In accordance with RCW 39.30.060 as amended by House Bill 1633:
For all public works contracts exceeding $1,000,000 the bidder shall submit with the bid the names of the
licensed subcontractors and proof of license". (Emphasis added.)
The City's Division 1 General Requirements state that "the Bidder shall submit" a completed
Subcontractor List Form containing "1. Subcontractors who will perform the work of structural steel
installation, rebar installation, heating, ventilation, air conditioning, and plumbing ... 2. The Work those
subcontractors will perform ... and the proof of license when required as described in RCW 39.30.060".
Division 1 General Requirements at 7 (emphasis added). "A proposal will be considered irregular and will be
rejected if: ... (e) The Bidder fails to submit or properly complete a subcontractor list (WSDOT Form 271-
015), if applicable". Id. at 10 (emphasis added).
The referenced statute, RCW 39.30.060(1), states:
Every invitation to bid on a prime contract that is expected to cost $1,000,000 or more for the
construction, alteration, or repair of any public building or public work of the state or a state
agency or municipality under RCW 39.04.010 ... shall require each prime contract bidder to
submit: (a) at the published bid submittal time, the names of the licensed subcontractors and
proof of license with whom the bidder, if awarded the contract, will subcontract for performance
of the work of: HVAC ... ; plumbing ...; and electrical ..., or to name itself for the work, if it
is licensed to perform the work for which it has named itself.
3 1 P a g e
(Emphasis added.)
Based on the above, FSW submitted a copy of its certificate of registration issued by the Department of
Labor and Industries with its bid proposal. In addition, FSW submitted a Subcontractor List which included an
electrical subcontractor falling within RCW 39.30.060(1), as well as two other subcontractors in the structural
steel and rebar installation categories. For each listed subcontractor — including the electrical subcontractor,
West Coast Signal Inc. — FSW provided proof of license obtained from the Department of Labor and Industries'
website. See Attachment A.
Earthworks did not satisfy the bid documents. It did not submit its Department of Labor and Industries
Certificate of Registration. Moreover, Earthworks' subcontractors' list included an electrical contractor, Service
Electric Co., Inc., along with its license number, but no additional proof of licensing was provided. Attachment
B.
RCW 39.30.060 plainly requires more than just a license number; it requires "proof of license".
Similarly, the City's bid proposal instructions require the subcontractor's list (which includes a space for
"Contractor's WA License No.") and "proof of licenses". "Proof of license" is not simply a contractor's license
number, because a license may be invalid, suspended or revoked. A contemporaneous print-out from the L&I
website showing the contractors' current license status is therefore required. The information submitted by
FSW, for example, is dated and time -stamped as of the date of the bid submittals: "3/25/26" at "12:30 PM" and
"12:31 PM".
The City has authority to waive "informalities and irregularities" in bid proposals if the variance is not
material, i.e., if it does not confer a substantial advantage or benefit not enjoyed by other bidders. Quinn
Construction Co., LLC v. King County Fire Protection Dist. No. 26, 111 Wn. App. 19, 27 (2002). Washington
law does not, however, authorize municipalities to waive material violations or to convert mandatory bid
submittals into optional guidelines after opening.
Here, RCW 39.30.060(1) requires that proof of licenses be submitted at bid -time. It does not authorize
post -opening submission of omitted proof. The City's bid documents repeatedly warned that the proof must be
submitted and that it was in addition to the completed Subcontractors' List: "Have you submitted the
Subcontractor's List and proof of licenses?" The bid documents also required bidders to submit a certificate of
registration.
Earthworks did not comply with either of the requirements discussed above. Therefore, its bid must be
rejected as non -responsive. FSW requests that the City sustain its protest, reject Earthworks' bid and find FSW
to be the lowest responsive and responsible bidder, and award the contract to FSW.
Very truly yours,
FURY SITE WORKS, C.
Mike Day
Vice President
Attachments A-1, A-2, B