The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About05/12/2026 - Agenda Packet • ` � • AG E N DA EQUITY COMMISSION 5:30 PM—Tuesday, May 12, 2026 Conference Room 410,4t" Floor, City Hall-1055 South Grady Way Please note this regular meeting of the Renton Equity Commission is being offered as a hybrid meeting and can be attended in person or remotely via Zoom. Forthose attendingvirtually: Please(1)followthis link or copy/paste it into a browser: https://us06web.zoom.us/j/82138490611?pwd=RZpMGQJmpUwF1 mQjl<GMKa8nu18409.1; (2)call in to the Zoom meeting by dialing 253-215-8782 and entering meeting ID 821 3849 0611 and passcode 620779; or(3) ca11425-430-6546 on the day of the meeting to request an invite with a link to the meeting. Public comment is permitted in person,virtually via the Zoom link above, or may also be submitted in writing to hlmiller@rentonwa.gov before 4:00 p.m. on the day of the meeting.Those providing audience comment will be limited to three minutes each unless an exception is granted by the commission.Attendees will be muted and not audible to the commission except during times they are designated to speak. 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL 3. STAFF COMMENTS 4. AUDIENCE COMMENT Those wishing to address the Equity Commission will be called upon. Each speaker is allowed three (3) minutes. 5. CONSENT AGENDA a. Approval of April 7, 2026, meeting minutes 6. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 7. NEW BUSINESS a. Recreation and Conservation Office Grant Project Applications Jason Lederer, Parks Planning&Trails Manager Ty Hairr,Associate Parks Planner b. Priorities and Performance Ryan Spencer, Organizational Development Manager 8. COMMITTEE MEMBER COMMENTS 9. COMMITTEE CHAIR COMMENTS 10. ADJOURNMENT For more information, please email: hlmillerCa�rentonwa.gov MEMBERS Jayne Ahrens Daniel Helmer Hemant Tanwar Cassandra Baddeley Manami Imaoka Dominic Williams- youth Ali Cohen Camila Lagow Matthew Woolcott • ` � • MINUTES EQUITY COMMISSION 5:30 PM-Tuesday,April 7, 2026 Council Conference Room 720, 7t" Floor, City Hall-1055 South Grady Way 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL Commissioners present: Cassandra Baddeley Daniel Helmer Manami Imaoka Camila Lagow Matthew Woolcott Commissioners attending virtually: Jayne Ahrens Ali Cohen Hemant Tanwar Dominic Williams Staff present: Kristi Rowland, Deputy Chief Administrative Officer Hannah Miller, ESD Administrative Assistant Patrice Kent, Senior Assistant City Attorney Jon Schuldt, Police Chief YoungYoon, ITDirector 3. STAFF COMMENTS 4. AUDIENCE COMMENT Those wishing to address the Equity Commission will be called upon. Each speaker is allowed three (3) minutes. 5. CONSENT AGENDA a. Approval of March 10, 2026, meeting minutes MOVED BY IMAOKA, SECONDED BY BADDELEY TO ACCEPT THE CONSENT AGENDA. CARRIED. 6. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 7. NEW BUSINESS a. Artificial Intelligence Policy Young Yoon, Information Technology Director b. Automated License Plate Readers Jon Schuldt, Police Chief 8. COMMITTEE MEMBER COMMENTS Commissioner Baddeley shared that she enjoyed the Mayor's State of the City address, but the event fell on the same night as a school board meeting. Is there a way to avoid scheduling over this next year? 9. COMMITTEE CHAIR COMMENTS Chair Lagow shared about a concerning incident that happened to her recently in Renton. The Volunteer Appreciation Dinner will be held next Tuesday,April 14 at 5:30 p.m. 10. ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY HELMER, SECONDED BY IMAOKATO ADIOURN THE MEETING. CARRIED. The meeting was adjourned at 6:58 p.m. For more information, please email: hlmillerCa�rentonwa.gov MEMBERS Jayne Ahrens Daniel Helmer Hemant Tanwar Cassandra Baddeley Manami Imaoka Dominic Williams— Ali Cohen Camila Lagow youth position Matthew Woolcott • ecreat � on a n . . onservat � on � ce . ra nt ro ect . . � cat � ons EQUITY COMMISSION MAY 12, 2026 TY HAIRR RCO G ra nt Progra ms ► Renton Parks and Recreation applied for funding for 4 RCO - . Programs ► Washington Wildlife and Recreation Program —Trails . . � , (WWRP Trails) for Northeast Renton Trailhead Park ► Washington Wildlife and Recreation Program — Local Parks (WWRP Local Parks) for Cleveland-Richardson Park • - ' �� ► Aquatic Lands Enhancement Account (ALEA) for Coulon Swim Beach Restoration ► Youth Athletic Facilities (YAF) for Liberty Park Northern Athletic Field Renovation . ' . • • ' Renton Parks and Recreation Grant Projects ► Cleveland-Richardson Park will be ' - - - • ' - developed if funding is received and is located in the highest need - area of the City ► Northeast Renton Trailhead Park is �� located in an area with moderate ,;' , need and will be a novel for Renton ► Liberty Park is centrally located � _; �� - and accessible via different � u , , . modes of transportation and will _ ; provide an amenity that is '�� , �� -� currently not available in Renton ► Coulon Park is the lone regional � � park in Renton and needs � .- . renovations that will improve accessibility, safety, and habitat function • • I � I • � I I 1 � 1 ' . ' . • ' • • • . . ' . • � � � NewcaStlei eN - _ LEGEND Ma CreekPark n --- Futureconnxnonto —EnhancestreamnparianareawrtnGrverse Y Newcastletrannenvork- natrvevegetanonanainztau�argewooayaebriz --- Potennaltutureacquisiuonpa�cel and trail system & ��I for in-stream�aDRat as recommentle0 In ?008 May Creek Drainage antl ReStorahon Plan � Ma Creek � � � � � 'v � Naturepaywitlltllmbingstruttures, Y zipine,sanG pit antl parent seating io' --- 6urtlngzeazonalAralnageteatuce � � � � StormwaterponU RcnicshH[ervnth � �� 6ASUngwetlan0�abita[ seating antl grills� i hrtur2envlronmental � .-�-- - EriSlingeMmtOiWetlan0an�5treamDuffer educanonareawithpotentialior TrailaccesstoMa Creekall neAtoutllize ' Edstln hent etree stewarOsOipauituraigamen � .JT,� � 9 '�.'� 9 � antlou[tloorclassroom �y , existingremnan[ antlaccesscortitlors; � �'�, y� ADAaccessmay0ec�allengingtlue[os[eep �Treecanopy � ' Flexideopeniawnspace� 1 , ■ ' graaes,traiiaccessmaylncmporarestatrz � roreduceeart�work . Nativefaestan0unde�storyresrorabon � (inva5ive specles removal anG native plannngl � � . LargeencloseGott-ieasn�ogarea � ♦ —pro[rctneu�agetrees ; Diversenativeriparianvegetation � - �� GatcdUryaccessto - . � � Wetlanaen�ancementarea . Stormwater ponU "�� \' - �\ z -, �� ` -- � �. In-stream habiUUogs Entrys�gn—'__ \ �, :i ,,y''r" �/�� . .,(•I,�J,Q�a. Open lawn � � ,' " �� Caving fw access matl an0 parking Sldewalk[onnection[o i Newcastietrallnetwork � '� , ��-�-._.. , � FootDnGge(ADAaccesslDle) �' via Duvail Ave NE anG �--}y"r� ; ( �- - y:,,„, . Potentiai opportunity to d CoalCreekDarkwa - ��.' _pwhtlefirzuretrailconnectlon �� Y - �i � / � � --- 5'wqeboartlwalk�ADAaCce55ible) �� meastusing�angieyRiageat � � � .. . � .. %'�� _ _ MayCreekaccezzeasemen[ • yyilAlifevlewingUeck (27Portabl2tolleti_� � BoarOwalkwiTh withenclowre �� __1� —�i�yingplatlorman0 5'wMecruShetlgravHpeMouS[raillADAaccessiblel Varking1or20v¢hltiES�/,^ -- --- intx etivesi na e � � � ._�- --�- P� 9 9 5'wberaWneanUMilslOetrallswrtnstairs anaflrenuCktumarWrM ' ,=� �„ alongstEEpterralnfnotAOAaccessiblel r �� -�- �� . LowlmpattCevNopment �y..\ � � 5'wbepave0trail(ADAaccessioiel �_ ztormwacer treatment at parking—/ _ �� . sucn as ram garGens or swa�es . Future trai�connecvons �• - � - ' �� owimpactnghnngtoi�mrcugntpaiution�� . _ hailnodewithseaurganaoppatuniryforvgnage � , anaemergencyoeaconstoproatlesecuriry �� ♦ � MmicshNterwit�[adesandgrills ., �. Trail�eatlkioskwf[�wayfln0ing . antle0ucationAgnage � Gwtabletoiletendosure � � _ �.�. '-� � ^••• Blkeparking `� ! ugnnng � 7a[IljunctlonhroCe /� P �� vdm interpreUve signage, 2�' Moniwr anU stewarC exlsting, � puWic art Matures � � benche5,an0 wetland views �ealthy(oreste0 areas WayflnOing and Interpre[ive signage 7raAconnMlontoatlacentnH hborhootl �--�� ....,._ ,..,,�, o ,m 9 � Ex s[ng s a.waik aiong eas2 siae of Dwau Ave NE �� Potential future enviwnmental educaaon area � . „�. . � antl Duvall Ave NE siAewalk j ren � � � � • � � � � . • • � . ' . • • • - • - • • � - - - - • . • . - . . • • . �,� � � � Grant Project Limit "' — — -�---�_ _ �l � _ �.� � M�EibtRrrtaNqn y , � _ _ , � � �`�� ti.r✓ l � � -•�� `, 7� .:./ �1 � .. . : � `��. . , .� _� � . �� _ ��Y- .\ . . � �. � Hdtirq Tra�wAn&idp�� ,� �oeu r.•il sr.s.m �'..� commmy caw�.�� "�. -i /r i� . , r�.� �•.a��. .��,..,,�,��. I�,, � ..• O ehnd�nd N�tiv�Prnt � � � � \ .. , - . . MaWowL�M�c+WITyp) .��,,� �• �rop�y�lionlve� - � � sro COUON ,. '� Y C\ � - .f+�� ^� l .. � �,.< . �� . . � ` ��. � �� . � " , • . � _.` [o^•^•�^^r �CirculationPaths �,� 1' �,; � �..m J nmi�ev.,� �. �' � . ' �r�:•.. ' _ � ,/' , ._ �.. _� - . �'�'Staf}/J�bMngBldg �. � -� . . - " ./' ' Con�t.uctw W Wna. � .� �� ///� � . .. � f �` ; . � i �� ;� , . .) S t.. HatilalRMwtion — _ .f�� .�� fl� 'l_``` L o ,'' j \�� H•e�ana.�i«.�w� J "'� Viewpoint- �t. �...i ty „r�.$� _ � ) , � )?. �r /fi. "y'; t� � WooaW�ern�l � �- ' �..,- I J Q f '� ? �\ � ��/ ✓ y �,� � �, '.�_�-L,.:,�, � j - ��'.� '� �j��f:. �s � ;�� ,�. , �.. `� I . � ' w�r,ri.N n«aow. Z�i'! r"• : . ! � . _ ��-. y{ Y' il�'� � -�1r r ..��/ � � � •1 looP Tnl catM.l^9 � �( , .�h V�� BoarOw�iM r�ai . . � "•( � ' p- ' Fe� S. I- + a«./v�wvvcio�. � 17:�� y��M�...I:�,T— v:.wpo�m. � �� 15-9�'i�. 1�ir i�y� 9 l /'Q'E,i .. ..� LL ��`� .: . �'x ~ .' �,� . 'jy\J�ah�r(NIC),��, ��i'. � 3'; -� �. f � .� V 9� 1 c`/ ��. I .. �� :�' ,�i. .. � PLiyAreas-•y. _-�.. � -,_�y�, ,r ) ., , ��_� � �Restroom � .y� . '> I/�brtrt Renor�.ion � ,�,� �� ,! — -- — ��"��i � ��' f�� ,,` .�� . - - — s- ^.-- •`� \�Parking including �� -Reinforced Twf Areas for * . � � - . � . � � Overfbw/Event Staging — �� 1, ( � J �� — — ' - — — — �.I �' �-- ' � i �� o w a- r-��i ._ � I � .i ��=�—� i cw�ua�r sc�c � � • • i � . � ' • . • . . - . � . . . . . Interpretive Signage � � � Grant Project Limit Large Woody Materials ...,.��..,�. Wke Debris Removal:Treated � _ _ � �� /Wood L'rfe Guard Tower • • C New Picnic Table with ADA Access i —�<� s, Fish Mix Gravels � � � \� \ Fill Removal Area " \ � ',\ � Boardwalk with Helical Piers/Piling and Light Penetrating Grating , � � Shoreline Protection Riparian Plantinq Restorotion Fencing 8 Address Stormwater Issues ��'� - " �,�� Habitat Restoration Signs , � -_ Ncw Barbecue and Ash Can Replace Concrete Circulation Paths 8 -- � — � . -- �Furnishings with ADA Access Address ADA Compliance n.,..,.n ,.�.,,,< � _—- ��_ w.,,. ' � - �y - - --__ "' --- _ 'I_� / ,�.,� --_ � —�- \ � . \ Restore Lawn � �.b \ \ � v r.,rn, 'trM✓:. . \ � . v. �� R J° r_ � \ / ` - �� .L[. .�New Receptacle Fumishings � _omA�. � �� nr�_�� I �,ti... � • � � . • � � � • � � • . • . � . , _ , , _; , I --�'Grant Project Limit � � � � � � / �� _, i � - -- - " . i a - i� � � .-Electronic Scoreboa�d Sign � � � � - ._ . " / . �- � � � � � f Field Fencin9(TYP)--- � •.. _..�i m ayiysba /�� ' . • . . ; � : ...��'"��" "O,�`� b� j / • • � �� ",'^�,,�� ' j '•�� / � � � ��.:��` . . e �•2 ••''•� �� , ,. / '�... . . // •• : . � / •' _ Multi-purpoze Field Devebpment . > . _ al� � Q � ; ��, : „ . ..,..o� � � �� ;�' � % , - _. W � . , ... , ,.� I ,, .rt,-�o.�� . ;W: - � � � •'�� % � � �� % �� • --- � �; � / �i •-�� '� �.i„��yr.��.� � ..- � - 6uupen � / '`;,,,,` . / v�<N.wnco,�n. , ' r: Fencing(TYP1 i /� . � : / � ..,�. � V� ' . , �_ % � B . . '- —•-- — - � '•` '-. � � Dugouts and ,,,<,.. . � -_ � �. � ' ' - ' ' I , _ S ectator Areas .�.��. '•� ;i - •��• �II ,�� E.�.cng5lo•ov.elay�., ,,,,,�,,,,.,, ''�y,� �' P / ��eM � � � w.� �_.� �f ti l��'Nwo. �E,ist�ng WMrta^0 /� C�' � `.. z��l � �� ... ,��.�,, ;�� • . Kiosk-- ;;.--�- � .��. .� C��a:ing SLI•�19 F / / ' �, \ {.!�! E,�.i�^v ._Bollards(TYP) / ��/ �� e..we�w�cwn. 1`;," e.�.��y s�a.w,.w � /, ��Y.. ��. � � -� .r 3? ; �� I �� - . � ' . � .:..�i�., „��.�.,,, ,.��.. �- Skateoah.fle�:room.f�yprounE.libnrv.CeEVRive� � ♦ ��..�� ..,. .�� - Faiatl�gVohirg / , Questions ThankYou ForYourSupport! � � Armondo Pavone // Mayor Executive Services // Kristi Rowland, Deputy Chief Administrative Officer May 8, 2026 Recreation and Conservation Office 1111 Washington St. SE Olympia, WA 98501 Letter of Support for Northeast Renton Trailhead Park-WWRP Grant Application On behalf of the Renton Equity Commission, we are pleased to express our support for the City of Renton's application to the Washington Wildlife and Recreation Program (WWRP)for funding to support the development of Northeast Renton Trailhead Park. The Renton Equity Commission works to promote equity, inclusion, and access for all members of our community. Access to parks and natural spaces is an important component of community health, environmentaljustice, and overall quality of life. The development of Northeast Renton Trailhead Park represents an important opportunity to expand access to outdoor recreation while protectingvaluable natural resources. Northeast Renton Trailhead Park will transform approximately 18.5 acres of publicly owned land into a neighborhood park that provides opportunities for recreation, connection with nature, and environmental learning. Planned features such as trails, a restroom, a trailhead, and a parking area will create welcoming opportunities for residents of all ages and backgrounds to enjoy the outdoors. The Equity Commission was also consulted during the development of the city's recently adopted Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Plan. Through that process, the Commission provided input on priorities related to equitable access to parks and nature, inclusive community engagement, and addressing park access gaps across Renton's neighborhoods. Expanding park access in growing areas of the city helps ensure that all residents have opportunities to benefit from nearby outdoor spaces and supports the city's commitment to equitable investment in community infrastructure. 1055 S Grady Way, Renton,WA 98057 // rentonwa.gov Recreation and Conservation Office Page 2 of 2 May 8, 2026 Providing safe and convenient access to parks supports physical health, mental well-being, and community connection. Parks also play an important role in ensuring that residents have opportunities to experience nature close to home. For these reasons, the Renton Equity Commission strongly supports the City of Renton's request for WWRP funding and encourages the Recreation and Conservation Office to support the development of Northeast Renton Park. This project represents an important investment in equitable access to parks, environmental stewardship, and the long-term well-being of the Renton community. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Camila Lagow, Chair Manami Imaoka, Vice Chair City of Renton Equity Commission City of Renton Equity Commission � c ,} � 1055 S Grady Way,Renton,WA 98057 // rentonwa.gov . � � Armondo Pavone // Mayor Executive Services // Kristi Rowland, Deputy Chief Administrative Officer May 8, 2026 Recreation and Conservation Office 1111 Washington St. SE Olympia, WA 98501 Letter of Support for Cleveland-Richardson Park—WWRP Grant Application On behalf of the Renton Equity Commission, we are pleased to express our strong support for the City of Renton's application to the Washington Wildlife and Recreation Program (WWRP) for funding to support improvements to Cleveland-Richardson Park. The Renton Equity Commission works to promote equity, inclusion, and access for all members of our community. Access to parks and natural spaces is a critical component of community health, environmentaljustice, and overall quality of life. Improvements to Cleveland-Richardson Park represent an important opportunity to expand equitable access to safe, welcoming outdoor space in a historically underserved area of Renton. The Cleveland-Richardson Park project will provide access to a neighborhood park to better serve the surrounding community. Planned improvements include a playground, parking area, and a restroom.These investments will help ensure that residents of all ages, abilities, and backgrounds have meaningful access to high-quality outdoor space. The Equity Commission recognizes and appreciates the city's commitment to inclusive community engagement throughout the planning of this project. Ensuring that the voices of historically underrepresented and underserved populations are reflected in park design and programming is essential to advancing equitable outcomes. The Commission also provided input during the development of the city's Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Plan, emphasizing the importance of addressing park access disparities, investing in underserved neighborhoods, and creating inclusive and culturally responsive public spaces.The Cleveland-Richardson Park project directly advances these priorities by improving access to recreation and green space in an area with identified need. 1055 S Grady Way, Renton,WA 98057 // rentonwa.gov Recreation and Conservation Office Page 2 of 2 May S, 2026 For these reasons, the Renton Equity Commission strongly supports the City of Renton's request for VWVRP funding and encourages the Recreation and Conservation Office to fund this important project.This investment will help advance equitable access to parks, environmental stewardship, and the long-term well-being of the Renton community. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, ��/� Camila Lagow, Chair Manami Imaoka, Vice Chair City of Renton Equity Commission City of Renton Equity Commission ` c ,} � 1055 S Grady Way,Renton,WA 98057 // rentonwa.gov . � � Armondo Pavone // Mayor Executive Services // Kristi Rowland, Deputy Chief Administrative Officer May 8, 2026 Recreation and Conservation Office Washington Wildlife and Recreation Program PO Box 40917 Olympia, WA 98504 � Support for ALEA Grant Funding—Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park � The City of Renton's Equity Commission is pleased to express our strong support for the Gene Coulon Beach and Shoreline Walkways Project and its application for funding through the Aquatic Lands Enhancement Account (ALEA) grant program administered by the Washington State Recreation and Conservation Office. The Equity Commission is committed to advancing equity, inclusion, and access for all members of the Renton community, particularly those who have been historically underserved or underrepresented in public investments. We view this project as an important opportunity to ensure that one of the city's most significant public spaces continues to serve a diverse and growing population in a way that is safe,welcoming, and inclusive. Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park is a cherished regional asset that attracts residents and visitors of all backgrounds. As the park ages, it is critical that infrastructure keeps pace in a way that prioritizes accessibility, safety, and equitable user experience.The proposed boardwalk and natural shoreline improvements will enhance the usability of the space without expanding its footprint, ensuring that existing access is improved for people of all ages and abilities. From an equity perspective,we are particularly supportive of the project's focus on improving accessibility and safety along the shoreline corridor. Enhancements to pedestrian pathways and viewing areas will better accommodate individuals with mobility challenges, families with young children, and older adults. At the same time,the project's emphasis on environmental restoration contributes to healthier, more resilient community spaces. 1055 S Grady Way, Renton,WA 98057 // rentonwa.gov Recreation and Conservation Office Page 2 of 2 May 8, 2026 The Equity Commission believes that projects like the Gene Coulon Beach and Shoreline Walkways Project are essential to building a more inclusive and connected city. By improving the quality, safety, and sustainability of an existing and heavily used public space, the city is making a meaningful investment in equitable outcomes for its residents. For these reasons,we strongly support this application for ALEA funding and respectfully encourage favorable consideration. Sincerely, � - Camila Lagow, Chair Manami Imaoka, Vice Chair City of Renton Equity Commission � City of Renton Equity Commission c ,} � 1055 S Grady Way,Renton,WA 98057 // rentonwa.gov . � � Armondo Pavone // Mayor Executive Services // Kristi Rowland, Deputy Chief Administrative Officer May 8, 2026 Recreation and Conservation Office 1111 Washington St. SE Olympia, WA 98501 � Letter of Support for Liberty Park Athletic Field Renovation—YAF Grant Application On behalf of the Renton Equity Commission, we are pleased to strongly support the City of Renton's proposal to renovate the northernmost athletic field at Liberty Park into a synthetic turf, multi-use facility. The Equity Commission is committed to advancing equitable access to public resources, including parks and recreational opportunities that support youth development, health, and communitywell-being. Liberty Park's proximityto downtown Renton, alongwith excellenttransit access and walkability make it one of Renton's most visited and popular parks. However, the current deteriorated condition of the north athletic field and poor drainage limit consistent use and programming opportunities. These conditions disproportionately impact youth and community groups that rely on public facilities for league sports, as the city is unable to reliably program activities such as youth league play. The proposed renovation will create a resilient, all-weather, multi-use field capable of supporting a variety of youth sports and activities year-round. This investment directly addresses a significant service gap in Renton's park system, as the city currently lacks a fully synthetic, lit, multi-use athletic field. By expanding reliable access, the project will reduce cancellations, increase programming capacity, and better serve a diverse range of users and groups, including underserved communities that rely on public facilities for recreation. This project aligns with the city's Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Plan and reflects ongoing efforts to reduce disparities in access to high-quality recreational amenities. Additionally, Liberty Park is located within one of Renton's communities with higher health disparities related to health 1055 S Grady Way, Renton,WA 98057 // rentonwa.gov Recreation and Conservation Office Page 2 of 2 May S, 2026 outcomes, and social and economic determinants. By investing in this centrally located and accessible site, the city is taking a meaningful step toward a more inclusive and equitable park system. For these reasons, the Renton Equity Commission strongly supports this Youth Athletic Facilities grant application and urges the State Recreation and Conservation Office to fund this important project.This investment will expand equitable access to recreation, support youth engagement, and strengthen community connections across Renton. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Camila Lagow, Chair � Manami Imaoka, Vice Chair City of Renton Equity Commission City of Renton Equity Commission c ,} � 1055 S Grady Way,Renton,WA 98057 // rentonwa.gov . • • • . riori � es a n � er orma nce Re nto n Res u lts MAY 12, 2026 - EQUITY COMMISSION RYAN SPENCER, ORGANIZATIONAL DEVELOPMENT MANAGER CITY OF RENTON �O' Business Plan 2026-2031GOAL5 a, , d� ��.� YF��.? ' r�' � ,. -:, .� ,. T.� .. �'� , ,� . �� : a.,�+� -..., ,3z� • • • Ou r Priorities . _ What Guides Us? . ' - ' : . . . . - �.. e. _ .i• �IM�O� ► Cityof Renton Business Plan _ . - � ,. N� � • • : . �.� ► Biennial Budgeting Proces . � .. � _ � � - __ � � �_ . ; ' �- i '3 . . ► Cit Council / Ma orPriorities `y�� _ �t � . : y y �� ti � .. _ -�� - o 0 ► Community Priorities - � � o ° ,�� .�.�-.�,a:.� .�.�..� ,��,....�,.�., ..�.e�.��, �.�,��..,� A�....�..�.�., a�n.�.�r�a i�.,�wma�a www '.emtfi�.,n� .a.�.....�ew.`w ��an,t�.ar wrwe.�..e '..�`.�"�`°'"""'"'^ mrvdtama� `°am..�w.�+.'.: n�,�an a+aat �`a�.��.w w...>.K•�. �,.w�.r�.+. �w:,,,�,r tes..e.w..w.a a.a r...�w+....sdw+...+� +�.:w..�m..r. �.a..r .....a�.`r � � � • • • . • - - � - �1�I�J lrt=��LK=�IK��1=�--��i�11 j��1■i��r�.•��►��-t- Is a safe and seaxe community t 0 � � � � • � Walkable and pedestrian frie�dly 7 5 � Has quabry housing cho�ces for people of all ages and income ;3 Balances devebpment with envirvnmental protection 7�� • � � • . Works creatively,partners,and invests 6 7 I Is accessible to me 6 7 Invites me to engage in two way dlalogue with the City 6 6 � � : I � • . • I , Fosters development of vibrant mixed-use neighborhaods 6 6 Nurtures entrepreneurship and suocessful partnerships 6.�3 Has a dynamic,diversified employment base 6� � � � Promotes our community as acoepting and opportunity-rich 6 0 � Understand and celebrate the diversity of Renton 5 8 Attracts and retains a highly skilled workforce 5 7 Has bold strategies for economic devebpment 5 5 Leverages public�private resources 5-1 Closer Look CommunitySurvey ► Conducted every 2-4 years ► Reaffirm city priorities align with community priorities ► Understand the community's experience with city services and programs ► I nform ou r performa nce- based budgeti ng process ► Guidedecision makingforfuture projectsand programs Closer Look CommunitySurvey ► Key Driver Ana lysis identifyi ng factors with greatest i m pact on residents' overall impression of Renton as a place to live ► G ro u p i n gs i n ove ra l l d r i ve rs : ❑ Public Safety ❑ Well Planned Community ❑ Live, Work, & Play ❑ Transportation & Mobility ❑ Diversity & Support ❑ Communication & Civic Engagement ❑ Environmental Stewardship Closer Look Results Based Accountability ( RBA) ► Adopted philosophy for organizational alignment ► Focuseson achievementratherthan activity ► Demonstrates how people are better off ( impact/value) ► C o m m u n i c a t i o n Powe r / P roxy Powe r / D a t a Powe r . - ' . • • • � � � � � • � � � • � • What's the quantity? What's the quality? �� 0 w a� � s � �n � � s � c�• � � �a a E a� s � �n r � L � Closer Look Results Based Accountability ( RBA) � . � . • How well did we provide e provide the service? Quadrant 1 Quadrant 2 . How are people better off because of what we did? Quadrant 3 Quadrant 4 Closer Look Results Based Accountability ( RBA) � . � . How well did we do it? , . Response respon Time . # of fires kept to % of fires kept to room of origin room of origin Is anyon better off? Closer Look Results Based Accountability ( RBA) � . � . How well did we do it? , Percent of staff erson with training/ treated certification Number of Percent of � clients off of clients off of alcohol & drugs alcohol & drugs Is anyon better off? Closer Look Results Based Accountability ( RBA) Measure Communication Power Proxy Power Data Power ' , � - . . . - � � • ' • ' • • • ' ' � • ' • Seeki n You r Feed back Renton Resu lts ► Are the performance measures : ❑ Meaningful/valuabletothecommunity ❑ Representing the full picture ❑ Demonstrati ng eq u ity effectively ❑ Hitting the mark or missing the mark . • � � � � • � • r-;.� .. -r -..- ., - _ -_'S . ��- -- � . .- , � . • . - _ �i -.. -_ -- � . <`j . �. �' , ,,.. . :'. . � `�. _ -��:-4..�l� .� <.'., .. "^ ! '.;`.��'r�� _ `� .� .ff - ` - --_� x�� -:� �... :,, �;�� _.�- . � . r �.' ' ; ,�� .. r� �r.. � ¢t_ - f " '�+'k�- ' �� .* ' a. ; --v' �:., - ��! • �x� ` _�_ ^�� _�� -S' �1.� _ ��v �. ,� . �--,--�: f � �`� t ' ��^� H y� '�^�- - . 1�, `� ` t lF` `��.Y-. . �, � '`��l� ys:.=- Y�'�' � _�� "i -��_ �y' �- -� - �l ;��_ � R ti �fi.',�•' _ ;•�: �Z�� . . t i;�� \` .� � � 1� . �� a t � . i � . Priorities & Performance Matrix ��N�oN REs��rs � �coNT�N�oUs iMPeo�� CITY OF RENTON CITY SERVICE AREAS COMMUNITY SURVEY KEY PERFORMANCE BUSINESS PLAN RESULTS PERFORMANCE MEASURES (budgeting priorities) I N D I CATO RS (or�anizational priorities) (community priorities) � ■ Prepare compLete and adequate discovery in all Per capita spending for Human Services Residents ratingfeeling somewhat or very safe Number of warrants processed by staff. cases,as measured by motions granted bythe (Human Services Funders ColLaborative duringthe day in the downtown area. Residents rating feeling somewhat or very safe during the court for inadequate discovery. application process). day in their neighborhood. Number of arrests due to Special Operations' Residents ratingfeeling somewhat or very safe Building reviewfor single family applications Increase the total number of Housing Repair identification and investigation of repeat during the night in the downtown area. completed within 2 weeks. services provided. offenders and/or trends of criminal activity. Residents rating of approachability of police Building reviewfor commercial appLications Total number of households that received Number of citations processed by staff. officers as"good"or better. completed within 4weeks. Housing Repair services. I Residents ratingfeeling somewhat or very safe duringthe Number of public/private partnerships engaged night in their neighborhood. Average response time(in minutes)to Priority II by Emergency Management Program Human Services generalfunds forthe Human calls(urgent;offense just occurred;possible Number of orders process by staff. employees and volunteers increasing Services Funders Collaborative application threat to life/property). community investment in the Emergency process. Management mission. Average response time(in minutes)to Priority Average percent of traffic safety camera Permit processingfor revisions or issuance of a III calls(non-emergency;no immediate threat notices of violation are provided within building permit is completed within 3 days. I Provide a safe, Residentsratingfeelingsomewhatorverysafeincityand tolife/property). fourteendays. health and vibrant Safet and Health Public Safet neighborhoodparks. Averageresponsetime(inminutes)toPriority Average number of training hours per Inspection requests receive response within 24 Y� Y y IV calls(non-emergency;welfare checks;noise com m u n ity. disruptions;lost property). commissioned empLoyee. hours. Percentage of compliance audits and I Codecomplianceisachievedwithin3weeksof Averagenumberoftraininghourspernon- investigations performed annually,as a percent date of initial request. commissioned employee. oftotalaccounts. Annualpercentofsuccessfulresolution orclearance of Provide Electronic Home Detention(EHD) assigned cases. Composite of results from survey of New Concealed Pistol Licenses will be services to reducejail costs.EHD referrals and probationer's understandingof probation completed within 30 days. revenue increases,resulting in a cost savings process reflected as"good"or better. to the inmate house budget. Percent of collision incidences resolved by Average response time(in minutes)to Priority I calls Increase the scope and extent of electronic Number of public records requests(police Patrol Services during regular hours of service (urgent;offense in progress;immediate threat to exchanges of information,including discovery, specific). to reduce resources needed in Patrol life/property). to the Defense Attorney. Operations. Number of Emergency Management Accredidation Program Number of Human Services programs awarded (EMAP)standards that are met as a measure of emergency Number of cases processed by staff. Be prepared for hearings and trials in all cases. fundingthrough the Human Services Funders I management excellence and indication of preparedness. Collaborative application process. Number of businesses/public/private Process land use applications requiring a Residentsratingtheirsenseofcommunityand relationshipsengagedandprovidingsupportto Residents ratingthe city's livability as"good"or better. decision bythe Hearing Examiner within 12 belonging as"good"or better. produce Renton River Days and Holiday Lights weeks of receipt of complete application. events is maintained or increased. The city's annual sales tax revenue growth rate(excluding Percentage of occupancy rate for swimming Number of visitors and people served by Process land use applications requiring an one-time items). lesson registrations. outreach(Museum). administrative decision within 8 weeks. Building an inclusive HenryMosesAquaticCentercustomersrate Diversity and Support Annualpropertytaxrevenueassociatedwithnew Totalnumberofroundsplayedannuallyat and informed citywith p theirexperienceandsatisfactionas"good"or P construction increases. Ma lewood Golf Course. Livable Community p� better. equitable outcomes Residentsratingthecleanlinessandappearanceofparks AverageFarmer'sMarketboothspace Totalnumberoflessonsprovidedannuallyat Live,Work, a nd Play and trail systems as"good"or better. occupancy as percentage of available space. Maplewood Golf Course. for all. Total number of Youth Academy and PGAIr. Maintain or increase the number of officially recognized Average daily attendance at the Senior Center. League golfers annually at Maplewood Golf neighborhoods/associations paHicipating in the program. Course. Percent of attendees at Renton River Days and Golf course customers rate their overall Total number of employees working in Renton(measured Holiday Lights events that report overall experience and satisfaction as"good"or by FTE)increases year overyear. experience satisfaction of 3 or better on a 1-5 better. scale. I I Customer satisfaction surveys rate the Residents ratingthe city's environmental stewardship Reduce annual average per capita water Maintain valid public water system annual range/type of park amenities offered as"good" efforts as"good"or better. consumption. operating permit with highest category ranking. or better. Water qualityto meet or exceed federal and state Infrastructure project plan review is completed Average Utility Billing aged accounts receivable Support planned regulatoryrequirements. withinanaverageof3weeks. (over90days)aspercentofannualbilling. growth and influence Develop Utility Systems workforce by providing Increase residential recycling annuaLtons collected per Development plans and permit reviews decisions to foster Utilities and Environmental trainingopportunitiestoaminimumpercentage capita completed within 5 business days of receipt. of employees annually. environmental Environment Stewardship sustainability and Increaseresidentialorganicsannualtonscollectedper Requestsforwastewatersysteminformation Utilitycostsatmidpointorlesswhencompared capita. provided within 2 business days of receipt. to other localjurisdictions. preservation. Maintain a Community Rating System(CRS) New Utility Billing accounts will be setup within Restore water service within 4 hours during emergency classification rating of 6 or betterwhich results 5 business days of notification(via final permit, shutdowns. in a 20%or more discount on federalflood email,etc.)-accounts are setup upon issuance insurance rates. and activated upon final date. Residentsratingtheconnectivitytolocalandregional Annualfundingobtainedthroughgrantstofund Reduceormaintainthenumberofinsurance centers via transit,sidewalks,and trails as"good"or transportation investment projects and claims against the city resulting from road better. programs. damage. Percent of Leasable airport property that is Minimize signal downtime as measured by annual count of Maintain safe bridges by completing biennial Promote economic Well Planned leasedtoaviationbusinessand/oraircraft failures of traffic signals and beacons. condition inspections on all city bridges. owners. vitality and Community M obi lity Number of takeoff or landing delays for any strated ICB�� 1 OSItl011 & aircraftlongerthan30minutesdueto b y r Maintain safe bridges by having zero bridges Annual number of feet of sidewalk added or replaced. inclement weather,routine surface rated in poor condition. Renton for the future. Transportation maintenanceoperations,thepresenceof Forei¢n Obiect Debris IFODI.or wildlife. Percentage of resident requests referred to Maintain a reasonable Overall Condition Index(Pavement) Public Works bythe Mayor's Office will be rating. 1 respondedtowithintherequestedtimeframe. Recognized/received the Government Finance Employee engagement rating per internal Number of public records requests(city general Annual cost of service per capita. Officers Association(GFOA)Distinguished Number of training courses provided by HR/RM. survey. requests/non-police). Budget Presentation Award. Number of findings by the Office of the Percentage of new hires and promoted Percent of cost recovery of empLoyee salary Residents rating the value of services forthe taxes paid to Washington State Auditor in the areas of Number of business days to recruit and fill non- employees who rate the hiring process as expenses spent processing public records Renton as"good"or better. financial statements,accountability,single civil service positions. "good"orbetter. requeststhroughrecordsfees/charges. audit(federal grants). Number of internal documents(contracts Residents ratingthe direction the city is heading as"good" Percentage of hiring managers who rate the Percentage of IT CIP projects that are Increase number of new hires over previous including lease agreements,MOU's,etc.)that or better. hiring process as"good"or better. completed within budget and on schedule. year. are executed andrecorded. Percentage of the total cost of Renton River Residents rating the city's performance of keepingthe ResidenYs satisfaction with understandingthe Routine legislation review wilL be performed Maintain or reduce the annual number of Days and Holiday Lights events that is funded community informed as"good"or better. court infraction process. within 7 calendar days of receipt. Workers Compensation Claims. bysponsors. Composite increase in residents'rating for M eet servi ce p Y Y each of the city's various information resources Complete routine contract review within 7 Vendors will be paid within 45 days of invoice Square feet of coverage per employee(IFMA Hours of service rovided annuall b volunteers. provided bythe Communications Division(e- calendar days of receipt. date. 60th percentile). demands and provide Representative communication,print,advertising,andmedia). Communiation Efforts high-qualitycustomer Government � DefendanYssatisfactionwiththeabilityto Maintain or improve the city's credit rating of AA(S&P's)for Complete routine contract addendums, p obtain access to court record information Percent of uptime for community-facing Number of Facilities Help Desk projects service with p( general obligation bonds and AA+(S&P's)for revenue amendments,and change orders within 2 related to infraction processing is rated"good" applications and services. completed. Civic Engagement bonds. orbetter. businessdaysofreceipt. measurable Internal Support Defendantsatisfactionwiththeir Numberofemployees(unique/different Propertyandtechnicalservicesreviewof o utco m es. Average customer satifaction rating of IT Division services Number of training hours per FTE provided to understanding of the criminal case process is individuals)attendingtraining/professional development proposals are processed within 2 per internal customer survey. court employees. rated as"good"or better. development opportunities provided. weeks. Defendant's satisfaction with the ability to Coordinate and leverage civic engagement Internally provided training and development Percent of system availability(network"uptime")as obtain access to court record information opportunities to conserve financial resources Minimize Fleet"comeback"repairs,as a opportunities are rated as"good"or better by provided by System Services. related to criminal case processing is rated through use of volunteers,resulting in annual percentage of the total repairs. attendees. "good"orbetter. costavoidance-valueofvolunteerservice. Number of organizations in which CED staff Ongoingjuror surveys reflect an approval rating Information requests/concerns from residents represents the city in local,regional,and that indicates satisfaction and understanding are acknowledged/assigned to the proper Percentage of Fleet work orders completed in Training hours/learning opportunities provided per FTE. statewide organizations focused in areas such of thejury experience by non-criminal citizens department for resolution within three business less than 72 hours. as Land use,economic development,and of Renton. days. building regulation. Recognized/received the Government Finance Number of legislative documents(agenda, Complete a safety inspection of each city-owned facility Officers Association(GFOA)Certificate of Percentage of new hires or promotions retained minutes,ordinances,resolutions,etc.) annually. AchievementforExcellenceinFinancial pasttheirprobationaryperiod. published&available. Reporting. Reco �� (,�'(Y O� + + Study questions or want more info? 'Q�c N T p� City of Renton - 2025 Community Survey Contact Ryan Spencer at Reco �� (,�'(Y O� + + Study questions or want more info? 'Q�c N T p� City of Renton - 2025 Community Survey Contact Ryan Spencer at ReconMR : , . . . , . _ . . . . . Reta�n�ivance Ma�rt Rr•;�:rch Why conduct a survey? This kind of research measures the satisfaction of residents with their city and the services offered by local agencies, while enabling the monitoring of progress over time. The information gathered from this survey is valuable for making decisions, allocating resources, and setting priorities. It is best practice to conduct such surveys every two years to stay connected with the community's changing needs. Overview of inethodology • 659 completed surveys. • Postcard invites mailed to a randomized sample of 16,000 Renton addresses with QR Code linked to the online survey and an individual Survey ID for each household. • Invites and reminders sent by multiple modes of contact: text, email, and phone calls. • The city conducted outreach to include hard-to-reach respondents. • Survey available online and over the phone; 28 surveys completed by phone. • The survey was available in 5 languages in addition to English. • Margin of error +/- 3.8% at 95% confidence level. This means that if the study were duplicated in the same time frame, with the same methodology, with a different set of respondents, 95 times out of 100, the results would be the same (+/- 3.8%). o ,� . . . . . - . ., . . i . , ,. ReconMR _ . . . . , _ . . , � Reta�n�ivance Ma�rt Rr•;�:rch Unweighted Weighted Demographics Survey data are not perfectly representative of the 18-34 10% 33% 33% populations of interest; thus, the data were 35-54 35% 3��ro s7�ro weighted based on four demographic factors: Age 55-64 23% 14% 14% 65+ 32% 16% 16% 1 .Age Z.Gender Male 50% 50% 50°/o Gender 3.Race Female 50% 50% 50% 4.1 ncome White alone(non-Hispanic) 63% 42% 42% Race Same other race or combination of races 37% 58% 58% The tables to the right provide the unweighted and Lessthan$50k 14% 29% 29% weighted proportions compared to the population data. $50k to less than $100k 26% 30% 30% I n co m e $100k to less than$150k 25% 18% 18% $150k to less than 200k 13% 11% 11% 200k+ 23% 12% 12% Race from Decennial Census Table P1 Income from 2021:ACS 1-Year Estimates SubjectTable 51901 Age within genderfrom 2021:ACS 1-Year Estimates SubjectTables 50101 o � . . . . . - . .y • • 1 • . .. ReconMR . - . . . . . - . . . . . . . - - . . . - Reta�n�ivance Ma�rt Rr•;�:rch Random Targeted Demographics A total of 16,000 Address Based Sample records 18-34 10% ,2�ro 33% were pulled. 12,000 of them were randomly 35-54 33% 3o�ro s7�ro selected from across the city. Age 55-64 27% 2s�ro 14% Additionally, ReconMR worked with the city's ss+ 31% 32��0 16% demographer to identify census block groups that Male 55% 5��ro 5o�ro Gender contained traditionally under-represented Female 45% 43% 5o�ro populations. An additional 4,000 addresses were Whitealone(non-Hispanic) 66% s2�ro 42�ro pulled from specifically within these census block Race Same other race or combination of races 34% 38% 58% groups. Lessthan$50k 13% 18% 29% The table to the right shows the unweighted $50k to less than $100k 26�ro 23�ro so�ro demographics from the random sample and the Income $100ktolessthan$150k 2s��o 2s��o ,s��o targeted sample. $150k to less than 200k 14% 9% 11% 200k+ 22% 23% 12% Race from Decennial Census Table P1 Income from 2021:ACS 1-Year Estimates SubjectTable 51901 Age within genderfrom 2021:ACS 1-Year Estimates SubjectTables 50101 o � . . . . . - . .y • • 1 • . .. ReconMR � , . _ . . Reta�n�ivance Ma�rt Rr•;�:rch While weighting data typically changes the mean score by a few tenths of a point, or a few percentage points on the distribution, it doesn't change the overall story that the data tells. For example, when we look at the weighted vs. unweighted daytime safety ratings, the narrative remains the same: that three-quarters of Renton residents feel safe in their neighborhood during the day. Weighted Unweighted , . , , ' � 7-Completely safe , � 6 a 5 4 • ' � 3 � 2 � 1 - Not safe at all 2,�o�o O Mean Score 20% 9% 8% 10% 8% � � �� Daytime Neighborhood Daytime Neighborhood Safety Safety o � . . . . . - . .y • • 1 • . .. ReconMR _ � _ . _ _ . _ Reta�n�ivance Ma�rt Rr•;�:rch The 2025 Community Survey utilized a 7-point Likert scale to measure satisfaction, confidence, and agreement on a variety of topics. Seven poi nt Li kert sca le i - � � �. �� .... � � � � „ • • p ^ � _ `.. ' Unfavorable Neutral - • - • - ' o ,� . . . . . - . ., . . i . , ,. Reco �� (,�'(Y O� + + Study questions or want more info? 'Q�c N T p� City of Renton - 2025 Community Survey Contact Ryan Spencer at ReconMR _ _ - _ . , . � Reta�n�ivance Ma�rt Rr•;�:rch Overall Impressions: The majority of residents rated their overall quality of life and the city's direction favorably, with particularly high marks from senior residents (65+). Residents aged 55 and older also expressed a stronger sense of community and belonging compared to younger residents. Neighborhoods and Parks: Neighborhood satisfaction remains high, with two-thirds of respondents giving a score of five or higher when asked to rate their neighborhood as a place to live on a seven-point scale. Six in 10 residents give high marks to the city's parks and outdoor recreation opportunities, and a similar number feel their city tax dollars are being used responsibly when it comes to Parks and Recreation maintenance and services. City-Sponsored Special Events: Although reported participation numbers were lower in 2025 compared to 2023, Renton's special events remain a valued part of civic life, with three-quarters of those who attended feeling these events build a sense of community, highlight Renton's diversity, and are a good use of public resources. Inclusion Efforts: The 2025 data suggests a shift in perceptions surrounding the city's effort to eliminate cultural barriers and provide equitable access to decision-making. The ratings gap between groups for equitable decision-making access narrowed, with White residents no longer significantly out-rating Asian, Black, and Native residents, as was the case in 2023. City employees received the highest ratings in the survey, reflecting strong public appreciation for their service and responsiveness. Nearly half of respondents said they had interacted with a city employee within the past 12 months, most of those taking place in-person. o ,� . . . . . - . ., . . i . , ,. ReconMR � , � . _ . � . _ _ Reta�n�ivance Ma�rt Rr•;�:rch Safety and Security: Safety remains a top priority and top concern for residents, with issues such as crime, theft, reckless driving, and encampments frequently cited as reasons for not feeling safe in neighborhoods, parks, and along trails. There is a notable proportion of residents who do not feel safe in their neighborhoods, particularly after dark (38% rated nighttime safety in their neighborhood as a three or lower on a seven-point scale). Although six in 10 residents expressed confidence in the Renton Police Department's abilityto respond promptly and enforce the law—consistent with 2023—there is still room to strengthen public trust and ensure all neighborhoods and communities feel secure. Walkability: "Easily and safely walk where needed" is the second-most important community priority and received the lowest scores out of all transportation questions. This is a moderately strong driver of overall satisfaction with Renton. In some neighborhoods, the issue may be more about pedestrian infrastructure; in others, it's more about feeling safe from crime or encampments while walking. To address this, the city should integrate operational police data with resident feedback to identify where sidewalk improvements are needed, where speeding and reckless driving violations are most frequent, and where safety concerns are limiting walkability. Housing and Affordability: This remains on the list of the top three most significant challenges facing Renton and is the third most important community priority overall. It is especially important to 18-34 year-olds, seniors (65+), and renters. While one-quarter of those concerned with affordable housing have seen progress in the past few years, 20% do not know what the city is doing to remedy this issue, and 48% perceive that the issue is getting worse. While housing affordability is a complex issue playing out in every city in America, the City of Renton could more clearly communicate its progress and path forward to the public. o ,� . . . . . - . ., . . i . , ,. ReconMR . _ - _ _ , _ _ . _ . _ _ . . . . . . - Reta�n�ivance Ma�rt Rr•;�:rch The 2025 survey reveals a persistent generational divide in Renton, with 18-34 and 35-54 year-olds consistently rating key aspects of life in Renton lower than their 55-64 and 65+ counterparts. There are statistically significant age group disparities on many topics, including quality of life, sense of community, perceived direction of the city, satisfaction with how tax dollars are used, Renton as a place to live, work, and raise children, confidence in public safety agencies, and ratings given to the city for its efforts to listen to residents and engage in two-way dialogue. While this trend includes 35-54 year-olds, 18-34 year-olds consistently stand out as the most dissatisfied. The 18-34 year-olds are also the least likely to be engaged with local information and news. The City of Renton has an opportunity to transform the growing dissatisfaction and disengagement among its younger workers, voters, taxpayers, parents, and residents into a powerful force for change. This opportunity comes when Renton faces significant challenges—crime, housing affordability, congestion, and people experiencing homelessness. Can the City of Renton tap into the fresh ideas, energy, and creativity of its youngergenerations to address these issues with renewed vigor? Converting cynicism into active participation is a two-way street. The first step is simple: initiate more conversations with these age groups. What are their concerns, ideas, and aspirations for their community? What do they need to feel a sense of purpose, ownership, and pride in their community? How do we get them involved? o ,� . . . . . - . ., . . i . , ,. ReconMR _ � _ . , , � . , . - _ . _ Reta�n�ivance Ma�rt Rr•;�:rch Key Driver Analysis: What is it? � � ' � � � � � . , -. . .. - Key Driver Analysis uses a combination of factor and regression analysis to identify factors with the greatest impact on residents' Overall Impression of Renton as a place to live. Groupings in Overall Drivers • Overall Impression of Renton is a calculated variable, based on ratings like Quality . . of Life, Sense of Community, City Direction, and more. . � • Key Driver Analysis measures the correlation between specific ratings as the .� � . � predictor variable, and Overall Impressions of Renton as the outcome variable. � . ' " ' ' ... " ' ' ' ' ' Why it's useful • Identifies what is most important to residents. • Identifies strengths to maintain and areas for improvement. Low impact/Above-Average Performance: High Impact/Above-Average Performance: Monitor Maintain Key Insights • Strength: Neighborhood quality is highly rated and strongly influences positive perceptions of Renton. Action: Continue fostering neighborhood safety and cohesion. • Opportunity: Safe pedestrian access is important, bUt I'2C21V2d IOW2f" f"dtlllgS. Low Impact/Below-Average Performance: High Impact/Below-Average Performance: Action: Evaluate why pedestrians aren't feeling safe in Renton. Solving this problem Invest Improve will likely boost residents' overall perception of Renton. o ,� . . . . . - . , . . i . , ,. ReconMR � - � , • - . � - Reconnaissance Market Research Low Im act/Above-Avera e Performance:Monitor Hi h Im act/Above-Avera e Performance:Maintain Groupings where the Cit� Environmental Stewardship of Renton is doing well: � Personal Safety Safety (specifically in � neighborhoods during the day) Work and Live • Live, Work, and Play (specifically neighborhoods a� and recreation � Diversity and Support • opportunities) o � a� � Room for improvement: Well Planned � Communication Efforts • Transportation (specifically pedestrian and cyclist safety) Communication (specifically two-way Travel in Rento dialogue with residents) • . Low Impact/Below-Average Performance:Invest Importance High Impact/Below-Average Performance:Improve c ,� '� Study questions or want more info? . City of Renton - 2025 Community Survey Contact Ryan Spencer at rentonsurvev(c�rentonwa.gov ReconMR � - � . - . . . � . Reconnaissance Market Research Low Im act/Above-Avera e Performance:Monitor Hi h Im act/Above-Avera e Performance:Maintain Where the City of Renton is doing well: Your nei hborhood as a place to live • Neighborhood livability Room for improvement: As a place to work • Renton as a place to �—Availability and variety of recreation activities raise children � � � 18-34 year-olds and 35-54 0 year-olds are more likely to � give unfavorable ratings to Renton ps p place to rpise As a place to raise children children, compared to 55+ residents. Hispanic residents are also more likely to give unfavorable ratings, compared to Asian, Black, Employment opportunities in Renton Native, and White residents. • . Low Impact/Below-Average Performance:Invest Importance High Impact/Below-Average Performance:Improve c ,� '� Study questions or want more info? . City of Renton - 2025 Community Survey Contact Ryan Spencer at rentonsurvev(c�rentonwa.gov ReconMR � - � . � - . . . - Reconnaissance Market Research Low Im act/Above-Avera e Performance:Monitor Hi h Im act/Above-Avera e Performance:Maintain Where the City of Renton is Neighborhood during the day doing well: � Neighborhood safety during the day Room for improvement: Safety along trails and � neighborhoods at night � � �a� � In Renton's parks and natural areas Along Renton's trails • Neighborhood at night • . Low Impact/Below-Average Performance:Invest Importance High Impact/Below-Average Performance:Improve c ,� '� Study questions or want more info? . City of Renton - 2025 Community Survey Contact Ryan Spencer at rentonsurvev(c�rentonwa.gov ReconMR � - � . . - . - . . . Reconnaissance Market Research Low Im act/Above-Avera e Performance:Monitor Hi h Im act/Above-Avera e Performance:Maintain Where the City of Renton is Maintaining parks and trail systems doing well: � Maintaining parks and trail systems Room for improvement: Preserving open space � and providing access to it � � 0 � a� d Protecting and restoring Renton's natural streams, lakes, and wetland • Preserving open spaces a d providing access to them Protectin water ualit in Renton's a uife" r nearb lakes stre ms and rivers 9 q Y q , Y , , . Low Impact/Below-Average Performance:Invest I m portance High Impact/Below-Average Performance:Improve c ,� '� Study questions or want more info? . City of Renton - 2025 Community Survey Contact Ryan Spencer at rentonsurvev(c�rentonwa.gov ReconMR � - � , � - . . . . . Reconnaissance Market Research Low Im act/Above-Avera e Performance:Monitor Hi h Im act/Above-Avera e Performance:Maintain Where the City of Renton is Including its diverse cultural and language populations doing well: • Cultural coor�ination efforts Including its diverse cultural population Informing:s diverse cultural and language populations of services pro ided by the city Cultural event coordination a� U Room for improvement: � � � Providing support for � Eliminating racial, economic, and soci�l barriers in city practices and policies people in need Providing opportunities to underserved and underrepresented groups Providing equitable opportunities to influence city decisi n making • to influence decision- making Providing support for people in need • . Low Impact/Below-Average Performance:Invest Importance High Impact/Below-Average Performance:Improve c ,� '� Study questions or want more info? . City of Renton - 2025 Community Survey Contact Ryan Spencer at rentonsurvev(c�rentonwa.gov ReconMR � - � . . . . . . Reconnaissance Market Research Low Im act/Above-Avera e Performance:Monitor Hi h Im act/Above-Avera e Performance:Maintain Where the City of Renton is Ease of car travel in Renton doing well: � Easy car travel around the city Room for improvement: Pedestrian safety a� � Adequacy of local roads to support new residentia and business developments Cyclist safety � � � � Connectivity to local and regional centers via transit, sidewalks, and tr ils Discussion question: � � � Why might pedestrians and • Traffic light timin cyclists feel unsafe along Incorporating pedestrian and bicycle design in city planning Renton's ropds? Is it Ipck of Easily and safely walk where needed sidewalks or bike lanes? � Speeding vehicles? Traffic patterns? Encampments? Easily and safely bicycle where needed • . Low Impact/Below-Average Performance:Invest Importance High Impact/Below-Average Performance:Improve c ,� '� Study questions or want more info? . City of Renton - 2025 Community Survey Contact Ryan Spencer at rentonsurvev(c�rentonwa.gov ReconMR � - � , . , . . Reconnaissance Market Research Low Im act/Above-Avera e Performance:Monitor Hi h Im act/Above-Avera e Performance:Maintain Where the City of Renton is Providing residents with accurate information doing well: � Providing accurate and timely information to Communicating information to residents in a timely manner residents • Room for improvement: a� U Engaging in two-way � dialogue with residents o that results in change � Communicating a clear ity vision and strategy for the future • Listening to residents and active y seeking involvement and input Engagi g in two-way dialogue with residents that results in change� . Low Impact/Below-Average Performance:Invest I m portance High Impact/Below-Average Performance:Improve c ,� '� Study questions or want more info? . City of Renton - 2025 Community Survey Contact Ryan Spencer at rentonsurvev(c�rentonwa.gov Reco �� (,�'(Y O� + + Study questions or want more info? 'Q�c N T p� City of Renton - 2025 Community Survey Contact Ryan Spencer at ReconMR � . , _ . _ . - . _ Reta�n�ivance Ma�rt Rr•;�:rch Most important priorities: • Safety and securit� Is a safe and secure community 10 • Top priority for all Walkable and pedestrian friendly 7.5 • Walkabilitv Has quality housing choices for people of all ages and in 7.3 • Higher priority for Balances development with environmental protection 7.0 residents under 55, Works creatively, partners, and invests 6.7 homeowners, and middle Is accessible to me 6.7 to high income households Invites me to engage in two-way dialogue with the City 6.6 Fosters development of vibrant mixed-use neighborhoods 6.6 • Quality housing for all ages and Nurtures entrepreneurship and successful partnerships 6.4 incomes Has a dynamic, diversified employment base 6.0 • Higher priority to young people, seniors, renters, Promotes our community as accepting and opportunity-rich 6.0 and low to middle income Understand and celebrate the diversity of Renton 5.8 households Attracts and retains a highly skilled workforce 5.7 Has bold strategies for economic development 5.5 How to interpret importance scores: An"importancescore"iscalculatedforeachcitypriorityand Leverages public/private resources 5.4 together all the scores add up to 100. This metric shows how much more important any one city priority is from another,in the opinions of respondents. o � . . . . . - . .y • • 1 • . .. � � � � Priorities - Age Comparison : . . .. . Is a safe and secure community Is a safe and secure community Is a safe and secure community Is a safe and secure community Walkable and pedestrian friendly Works creatively, partners,and Housing for all incomes and ages invests to improve delivery of city Housing for all incomes and ages services Works creatively, partners,and � invests to improve delivery of city services Fosters development of vibrant Nurtures entrepreneurship and Works creatively, partners,and -use neig d ages successful partnerships invests to improve delivery of city services Nurtures entrepreneurship and ' Fosters development of vibrant ' successful partnerships mixed-use neighborhoods mixed-use neighborhoods Housing for all incomes and ages Is accessible to me Works creatively, partners,and : invests to improve delivery of city Is accessible to me services � Fosters development of vibrant Is accessible to me Attracts and retains a highly mixed-use neighborhoods skilled workforce � Promotes our community as Has bold strategies for economic Leverages public/private Has a dynamic, diversified accepting and opportunity-rich development resources employment base �� Study questions or want more info? ��' City of Renton - 2025 Community Survey Contact Ryan Spencerat �FNTo? � � � � Priorities - Income Comparison , , „ „ „ ,. � Is a safe and secure community Is a safe and secure community Housing for all incomes and ages Housing for all incomes and ages Fosters development of vibranf '..�,. mixed-use neighborhoods , Fosters development of vibrant Housing for all incomes and ages mixed-use neighborhoods Housing for all incomes and ages Works creatively, partners,and Works creatively, partners,and Works creatively, partners,and Has bold strategies for economic . invests to improve delivery of city invests to improve delivery of city invests to improve delivery of city services services services r��i�nnnent�[p,rotectiar� Nurtures entrepreneurship and Promotes our community as Works creatively, partners,and ' successful partnerships accepting and opportunity-rich invests to improve delivery of city services � Fosters development of vibrant Nurtures entrepreneurship and Nurtures entrepreneurship and Nurtures entrepreneurship and mixed-use neighborhoods successful partnerships successful partnerships successful partnerships � Promotes our community as Is accessible to me accepting and opportunity-rich �� Study questions or want more info? ��' City of Renton - 2025 Community Survey Contact Ryan Spencerat �FNTo? � � � � Priorities - Homeowners and Renters . �- Is a safe and secure community Is a safe and secure community Housing for all incomes and ages � Works creatively, partners,and invests to improve delivery of city services Is accessible to me ' Fosters development of vibrant mixed-use neighborhoods . Balances development with environmental protection : Nurtures entrepreneurship and successful partnerships Works creatively, partners,and invests to improve delivery of city services • Fosters development of vibrant mixed-use neighborhoods u ures en repreneurs ip an success u pa ners ips � �� Study questions or want more info? ��' City of Renton - 2025 Community Survey Contact Ryan Spencerat �FNTo? Reco �� • Most significant challenges facing Renton (,�'(Y O� + + Study questions or want more info? 'Q�c N T p� City of Renton - 2025 Community Survey Contact Ryan Spencer at ReconMR . . , , _ . _ Reta�n�ivance Ma�rt Rr•;�:rch The majority of residents feel Renton is facing very complex challenges of crime, congestion, housing affordability, and homelessness. The affordability of housing is more widely reported as a challenge by 18-34 year-olds, renters, and low-income households. Roughly half of residents see encampments and providing services to those in need as a significant challenge. What do you see as the most significant challenges facing the City of Renton in the next 5 years. Please select all that apply. Crime 70% Traffic 57% Affordable housing 55% Addressing encampment cleanliness and safety concerns 50% Providing mental health, addiction, and sheltering services 44% Infrastructure maintenance 43% Dilapidated/rundown properties 35% Protecting our environment 26% Providing equitable access to services 26% Responding to growing service demands 25°/o o ,� . . . . . - . ., . . i . , ,. Reco �� • Quality of life • Responsible use of tax dollars • Direction city is headed • Environmental stewardship efforts • Sense of community • Traffic and transportation • Comparability to other communities ' Walkability by neighborhood • Other livability traits (,�'(Y O� + + Study questions or want more info? 'Q�c N T p� City of Renton - 2025 Community Survey Contact Ryan Spencer at ReconMR � . � _ Reta�n�ivance Ma�rt Rr•;�:rch Two-thirds of residents gave a rating of 5 or higher when asked to rate their quality of life in Renton. Ratings are higher among senior residents (65+) than residents younger than 65. There are no differences when looking at income, race, or other demographics. How would you rate your overall quality of life in Renton? Using a scale from 1 to 7 where "1"means the quality of life in Renton "does not meet your expectations at all"and "7"means the quality of life "greatly exceeds your expectations." . - Greatly exceeds my expectations 40% � 6 40% I 5 - . 4 3 � 2 ,� 1 - Does not meet my expectations at all 23% o O Mean Score 19/o 10% 13% 6% 3% 3% 4% 2023 2025 o � . . . . . - . .y • • 1 • . .. ReconMR • - • - . • - • Reta�n�ivance Ma�rt Rr•;�:rch Half of residents gave a rating of 5 or higher when asked what direction Renton is headed. Senior residents have more optimism about Renton's direction, compared to younger groups. Overall, would you say that Renton is headed in the right or wrong direction? Using a scale from "1"to "7"where "1"means "strongly headed in the wrong direction" and 7 means "strongly headed in the right direction. '�' � ' . 7- Strongly headed in the right direction 27% o � 6 27/o � 5 ` 4 3 25% o I' 2 21 /0 1 - Strongly headed in the � wrong direction OMean Score 10% 15% 9% 9% 8% 6% 2023 2025 o � . . . . . - . .y • • 1 • . .. ReconMR - - • • Reta�n�ivance Ma�rt Rr•;�:rch Sense of community is strongest among long-time residents and lower to middle income households. There is opportunity to foster a sense of community among younger age groups and new residents. Overall, how would you rate the sense of community and belonging you feel in Renton? Using a scale from "1"to "7"where "1"means "no sense of community"and 7 means "strong sense of community." .� . ' - Greatly exceeds your '# �` expectations � 6 � 5 20% 21% 4 3 2 22% 21% 1 - Does not meet your � expectations at all OMean Score 17% 17% 10% 15% 7% 6% 2023 2025 o � . . . . . - . .y • • 1 • . .. ReconMR • • . . • • • - • - Reta�n�ivance Ma�rt Rr•;�:rch Over half of residents gave a rating of 5 or higher when asked how Renton compares to other cities and towns. Seniors and residents who have lived in the area longer gave the highest ratings. Compared to other cities and towns, how would you rate Renton as a place to live? Using a scale from 1 to 7 where 1 means "significantly worse than other cities and towns"and 7 means "significantly better than other cities and towns." . 7- Significantly better than other cities and towns 30% • 6 30% 5 4 3 � 2 25% o . 1 - Significantly worse than 22�° other cities and towns OMean Score 14% 16% 6% 5% 4% 3% 2023 2025 o � . . . . . - . .y • • 1 • . .. ReconMR - - . . . - - . . . . . Reta�n�ivance Ma�rt Rr•;�:rch Six in 10 residents' expectations are exceeded when it comes to how funds are being used for parks and recreation, wastewater, and water utility services. All ratings are consistent with 2023. Do you feel your City tax dollars are being used responsibly and correctly in the following areas? Using a scale from 1 to 7, where 1 means "does not meet my expectations at all"and 7 means "greatly exceed my expectations" 7 2023 6 • 2025 5 4.8 4.8 4.9 4.8 4.9 4.7 4.4 4.4 - - - - - - - - - - 4.1 - �- -�� - - - - 4.1 - �.g - - - - 3.� - Scalemidpoint 4 - - - - - 3.8- - - 3.7- - - - 3 2 1 Parks/rec Wastewater Water Garbage and Public safety Court services Road Development maintenance utilities utilities recycling maintenance services and services services o ,� . . . . . - . , . . i . , ,. ReconMR • - . - . • • Reta�n�ivance Ma�rt Rr•;�:rch Two-thirds of residents gave favorable ratings (5 or higher) to Renton's park and trail system maintenance, preservation of open space, and protection of water. West Hill residents gave the highest ratings to park stewardship and open space access, compared to those who live in other areas. Please rate Renton's environmental stewardship efforts in the following areas. � Using a scale from 1 to 7, where 1 means "very poor"and 7 means "excellent" 2023 g • 2025 5 4.8 4.9 4.5 4.6 4.8 4.5 4.4 4.5 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Scalemidpoint 3 2 1 Maintaining parks Protecting and Protecting water Preserving open and trail systems restoring Renton's quality in Renton's spaces and providing natural streams, aquifer, nearby access to them lakes, and wetlands lakes, streams, and rivers o ,� . . . . . - . , . . i . , ,. ReconM R . . • . • • . • Reta�n�ivance Ma�rt Rr•;�:rch Ratings for traffic and transportation questions are consistent with 2023. The bottom three ratings center around safety and infrastructure for pedestrians and cyclists. Walkability received the second-highest importance score in the priority analysis. � How would you rate Renton on each of the following? Using a scale from 1 to 7, where 1 means "very poor"and 7 means "excellent" 2023 6 • 2025 5 4.4 4.3 4.2 4.0 4.0 4 - - - - - - 3.9- - - - - -3-8- - - - - � - �-�- - - - -�Z - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Scalemidpoint - - - ��- 3.4 - ��- - 3.2 �.� - - - - - - 3 2 1 Ease of car travel Adequacy of local Connectivity to Traffic light Incorporating Easily and safely Easily and safely in Renton roads to support local and regional timing pedestrian and walk where needed bicycle where new developments centers via bicycle design in needed transit, city planning sidewalks, and trails o ,� . . . . . - . ., . . i . , ,. ReconMR , , . � _ . � . . . . Reta�n�ivance Ma�rt Rr•;�:rch Walkability ratings vary by neighborhood. Safety data suggests that in some neighborhoods, walkability ratings may be more impacted by a lack of sidewalks and lighting, while in other areas, it may be more about street crime. For example, Highlands residents were significantly more likely to cite lack of sidewalks and reckless driving as reasons for feeling unsafe in their neighborhood. Cedar River and City Center residents were more likely to cite homeless encampments, but less likely to cite a lack of sidewalks. East Plateau residents were more likely to cite a lack of police presence. 7 How would you rate Renton on: Easily and safely walk where needed Using a scale from 1 to 7, where 1 means "very poor"and 7 means "excellent" 6 5 4.4 4.1 4 3.7 3.6 3.4 3.4 3.3 3 3.0 2 1 Talbot City Center Benson Kennydale Highlands West Hill Cedar River East Plateau o ,� . . . . . - . , . . i . , ,. ReconMR • - . • . Reta�n�ivance Ma�rt Rr•;�:rch The majority of residents view Renton as a good place to live, work, and play. Long-term residents rate Renton more favorably as a place to work than newer residents. All ratings are consistent with 2023. How would you rate Renton on the following? 7 Using a scale from 1 to 7, where 1 means "very poor"and 7 means "excellent" 2023 6 • 2025 5 4.8 4.9 4.7 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.3 4�4 4 2 4.3 4 � 4.2 Scale midpoint 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.9 3.9 3.g 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3 2 1 Your As a place to Recreation As a place to Vibrant Well-planned Well-planned Providing Employment neighborhood work opportunities raise children downtown business residential support for opportunities as a place to districts neighborhoodspeople in need in Renton live o ,� . . . . . - . , . . i . , ,. Reco �� (,�'(Y O� + + Study questions or want more info? 'Q�c N T p� City of Renton - 2025 Community Survey Contact Ryan Spencer at ReconMR • _ . . _ . _ . . � , . Reta�n�ivance Ma�rt Rr•;�:rch Renton's most popular activities center around getting outside, whether it's going to a park, hiking, or attending the Farmer's Market. In the past 12 months, have you or anyone in your household done any of the following? Showing "Yes, me personal/y" + "Yes, someone in my household" Visited a park City trails Farmer's Market River Days, Holiday Lights 91 % 73% 62% 58% o ,� . . . . . - . , . . i . , ,. ReconMR • _ . . _ . _ . . � , . Reta�n�ivance Ma�rt Rr•;�:rch Survey data suggests higher participation in city recreation programs among women compared to men. Multilingual households were more likely to have attended an arts or performance event. Renton History Museum has higher participation among those with a mobility, sensory, or other disability or chronic condition. In the past 12 months, have you or anyone in your household done any of the following? Showing "Yes, me personally" + "Yes, someone in my household" City recreation program Attended an arts event City coordinated volunteering Renton History Museum 36% 30% 19% 19% o ,� . . . . . - . ., . . i . , ,. ReconMR � _ , _ . . . , . . Reta�n�ivance Ma�rt Rr•;�:rch Fifty-six percent of residents gave a rating of 5 or higher to Renton's culturally-focused event coordination efforts, consistent with 2023. Please rate the City of Renton's coordination efforts on culturally focused community engagement and/or experiences provided by Renton. Using a scale from 1 to 7 where "1"means "Very poor"and "7"means "Excellent" • 7 � 6 . � 5 4 3 2 28% 23% . 1 OMean Score 17% 18% 12% 11% 5% 9% 8% 7% 2023 2025 o � . . . . . - . .y • • 1 • . .. ReconMR - , � , . , _ , _ Reta�n�ivance Ma�rt Rr•;�:rch Reported participation levels have decreased since 2023. Hispanic residents were significantly less likelyto have participated compared to Asian and Black residents. Have you participated in an of these culturally focused events and/or experiences provided by the City of Renton? � � ' � ' , , � ' � Yes my household has . s � • � , � ' ' participated No, have not participated 93% 0 0 80% 67% 78/0 78/0 72% 71% 2023 2025 Native American, Asian American Black or African Hispanic, Latino, or White Alaskan, or Pacific American Spanish origin Islander o ,� . . . . . - . ., . . i . , ,. ReconMR , _ . , _ , _ Reta�n�ivance Ma�rt Rr•;�:rch Three-quarters of residents who have participated in Renton's culturally-focused special events feel that they build a sense of community, celebrate the community's diversity, and are a good use of public resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree that city sponsored special events and activities... Using a scale from 1 to 7 where "1"means "Strongly disagree"and "7"means "Strongly agree" Build a sense of community Highlight and celebrate our diversity Are a good use of public resources � , ' ' • ' , � , � � ' • Don't know • 5 or higher 4 midpoint � � ' . , ' � ' � � � � I 3orlower , , 13% 14% 13% 0 10% o 20% 16% 21% 15% 19% 17% No, have not Yes, my household No, have not Yes, my household No, have not Yes, my household participated has participated participated has participated participated has participated o ,� . . . . . - . , . . i . , ,. Reco �� (,�'(Y O� + + Study questions or want more info? 'Q�c N T p� City of Renton - 2025 Community Survey Contact Ryan Spencer at ReconM R . . . . Reta�n�ivance Ma�rt Rr•;�:rch Communication ratings are consistent with 2023. The majority feel the city is doing a good job of providing accurate and timely information. There is room for improvement on communicating a clear vision and engaging with residents in a way that results in change. How would you rate Renton on each of the following? Using a scale from 1 to 7, where 1 means "very poor"and 7 means "excellent" 7 2023 6 • 2025 5 4.6 4.7 4.4 4.5 4 � 3.8 4.1 3.9 3.7 3.5 3.7 3 2 1 Providing Communicating Communicating Listening to Engaging in residents with information to a clear city residents and two-way accurate residents in a vision and actively dialogue with information timely manner strategy for seeking residents that the future involvement results in and input change o ,� . . . . . - . , . . i . , ,. ReconMR , . , . _ , . _ , . _ Reta�n�ivance Ma�rt Rr•;�:rch Twenty-eight percent of survey respondents live in a multilingual or non-English speaking household. English (n= 643) Spanish (n= 56) 72% Chinese (n= 37) Japanese (n= 27) Tagalog (n= 25) Vietnamese (n= 21) Korean (n= 18) 28��0 OtherAsian (Including Hindi, Thai, Malaysian, Hmong, etc.) �n= 12) Other Indo-European (Including Portuguese, �n- 11) Italian, French, etc.) American Sign Language (ASL) (n= 7) Speak English only Multilingual or no Russian, Polish, and Other Slavic (n= 4) English o ,� . . . . . - . ., . . i . , ,. ReconMR . _ . . � _ _ , . , . _ . . , , . Reta�n�ivance Ma�rt Rr•;�:rch Fifty-two percent of residents gave a rating of 5 or higher to the city's job communicating its services to the diverse cultural and language populations in Renton. Residents from multilingual or non-English-speaking households gave ratings consistent with that of English-only residents. How would you rate Renton on: Informing its diverse cultural and language populations of services provided by the City. Using a scale from 1 to 7, where 1 means "very poor"and 7 means "excellent" . � 5 or higher 4 midpoint � 3 or lower � O Mean Score 24% 14% Speak English only Multilingual or no English o � . . . . . - . .y • • 1 • . .. ReconMR . , . � , � _ . _ Reta�n�ivance Ma�rt Rr•;�:rch Ratings for inclusion of diverse populations have decreased from 2023, while ratings for elimination of barriers and equitable access to decision-making remain consistent. Ratings are consistent between English-only households and multilingual households. How would you rate Renton on each of the following? � Using a sca/e from 1 to 7, where 1 means "very poor"and 7 means "excellent" 2023 6 • 2025 5 4.9 4.5 4.5 4.2 4.2 4.0 4 � 3 2 1 Including its Eliminating racial, Providing equitable diverse cultural and economic, and social opportunities to language populations barriers in city influence city practices and decision making policies o ,� . . . . . - . , . . i . , ,. ReconMR . , . � , � _ . _ _ . _ . : - , _ Reta�n�ivance Ma�rt Rr•;�:rch The 2025 data suggests shifting perceptions. Native American, Alaskan, and Pacific Islander residents reported improved views on elimination of barriers and access to decision-making access compared to 2023 (p value = 0.03 and 0.04). While sample sizes for this group are small (n=18 in 2023, n=37 in 2025), this shift is statistically significant. The rating gap between groups for equitable decision-making access narrowed, with White residents no longer significantly outrating Asian, Black, and Native residents, as was the case in 2023. However, Hispanic residents continue to report lower ratings than all other groups on the elimination of barriers to city practices and policies. 2023 Ratings 2025 Ratings � Native American, Alaskan, or Pacific Islander 5.4 5.0 • Asian American 4.64.54.0 4.0 4 7 4.5 4'84.64 4 4,54 34 � 4.7 4 2 4.3 4.4 • Black or African American 3�9 3.7 3.8 3 g 3�9 Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish 3.1 3.3 3.3 origin 2.7 2.9 2.7 White 2.0 ' 1 Including its Eliminating racial, Providing equitable Including its Eliminating racial, Providing equitable diverse cultural and economic, and social opportunities to diverse cultural and economic, and social opportunities to language populations barriers in city influence city language populations barriers in city influence city practices and decision making practices and decision making policies policies o ,� . . . . . - . , . . i . , ,. ReconMR . _ . - , . . . , . Reta�n�ivance Ma�rt Rr•;�:rch How much attention do you pay to news and events about Renton? The majority of residents are paying at least some attention to local news and �� events, and one-quarter pay a great deal . 7- Pay a great deal of attention of attention. Homeowners and those • 6 who have lived in Renton longer are .� 5 more likely to be tuned in. 4 ' 3 27% 2 290�0 � 1 - Do not pay any attention 16% O Mean Score 19% 14% 20% 16% 6% 12% 13% 10% 10% 6% 0 6% 5/0 3% � � 3% _ Less than 5 years 5-10 years 10-20 years 20+ years Years lived in Renton o ,� . . . . . - . ., . . i . , ,. ReconMR . , _ . , - _ _ _ _ Reta�n�ivance Ma�rt Rr•;�:rch How do you prefer to get information Website: most widely utilized information resource, consistent use across all about news and happenings in Renton? demographic categories. City website 47% Cable access channel: Least utilized, consistent across demographics. "This Week in Renton" E-Newsletter 46% E-Newsletter: More popular among older residents, long-time residents, and homeowners. O�portunity to get new residents and renters looped into the newsletter Social media 44% Renton Reporter: More popular among longtime residents. The "Renton Reporter" 39% Utility bill: More popular among older residents, longtime residents, homeowners, and multilingual households (39% of multilingual households prefer the utility bill, compared "Let's Go Renton" brochure 35% to 26% of English-only households) Information in utility bill 30% Social media: more popular among under residents under 65, women, and high-income earners (200k+). Word of mouth (family, neighbors, etc.) 30% Insight: Lean into marketing the E-Newsletter and Renton Reporter to young people and new residents. Perhaps recruit readers from social media targeted ads? Cable Access Channel 21 5% "Hey, sick of doom-scrolling? Want relevant news about your community?Sign up to receive the Renton newsletter." Other information source 13% o ,� . . . . . - . , . . i . , ,. Reco �� (,�'(Y O� + + Study questions or want more info? 'Q�c N T p� City of Renton - 2025 Community Survey Contact Ryan Spencer at ReconMR . . _ _ - . _ , _ , , _ Reta�n�ivance Ma�rt Rr•;�:rch Six in 10 of residents gave favorable ratings to timely response and consistent enforcement of the law. The mean ratings for police performance are consistent with 2023. Older residents, those who have lived in the area longer, and higher income-earners gave higher ratings. Hispanic respondents gave lower ratings to "consistently enforces the law," compared to Asian, White, and BIPOC residents. Talbot residents gave higher ratings to police, compared to those who live in East Plateau, Highlands, and City Center. How confident are you in the following aspects of the Renton Police Department? 7 Using a scale from 1 to 7, where 1 means "not at all confident"and 7 means "very confident" 2023 g • 2025 5 4.7 4.8 4.2 4.2 4 3 2 1 Able to respond to Consistently enforces emergencies in a the laws timely manner o ,� . . . . . - . , . . i . , ,. ReconMR • � , . , , . . - . _ , _ Reta�n�ivance Ma�rt Rr•;�:rch Sixty-three percent of residents gave favorable ratings (5 or higher) to police approachability, consistent with 2023 ratings. Older residents, those who have lived in Renton longer, homeowners, and higher-income earners gave higher ratings. 7 How would you rate the approachability of Police Officers in Renton? Using a scale from 1 to 7, where 1 means "not approachable at all"and 7 means "very approachable" 2023 • 2025 6 5.1 5 4.8 4 3 2 1 o ,� . . . . . - . , . . i . , ,. ReconMR � , _ - _ � , _ . _ Reta�n�ivance Ma�rt Rr•;�:rch Confidence ratings for Renton's disaster preparedness remain below the scale midpoint. There is opportunity to communicate with the public on how the city is prepared for earthquakes, floods, and other major disasters. How confident are you that Renton is prepared to respond to major disasters such as earthquakes, floods, and/or other major disasters? � 7-Very confident � 6 22% • 5 19% � 4 3 � 2 �8% �8% � 1 - Not at all confident OMean Score 17% 18% 14% 12% 16% 18% 2023 2025 o � . . . . . - . .y • • 1 • . .. ReconMR . . _ . _ _ Reta�n�ivance Ma�rt Rr•;�:rch Code enforcement ratings remain below the scale midpoint (3.4 out of 7, consistent with 2023 ratings). While mean ratings are relatively consistent between neighborhoods, there is nuance in the distribution of responses. Respondents who live in City Center gave higher proportions of "very poor" ratings. Please rate Renton's efforts to enforce codes related to property maintenance issues. � �� • 6°io �� 46% � 7 - Excellent 17% � 5% 7% � 6 29% ' 5 15% � 18% 6/0 13% + 4 17% 24% 9% � 3 10% 23% 9% 2 27% 13% 19% 0 1 -Very poor 33/0 18% O � Mean Score 0 39% 36% 17/o � 21% 26% 36% o 15/o 14% � 5% 21% o 18% 19/o 13% $% �12% 9% � � � � 0 L � Talbot Cedar River Benson West Hill Kennydale East Plateau City Center Highlands o � . . . . . - . .y • • 1 • . .. ReconMR � , _ , _ _ . _ . Reta�n�ivance Ma�rt Rr•;�:rch Overall, daytime safety ratings in Renton are high, although have decreased slightly from 2023. This change is statistically significant and should continue to be monitored. � Safety-7 � Safety-6 � Safety-5 Safety-4 •'� Safety-3 � �: Safety-2 � Safety- 1 OMean Score 21% 19% 9% 8% 10% 5% 0 �� 4% 2023 2025 o � . . . . . - . .y • • 1 • . .. ReconMR � , _ , _ � _ . � . . . . Reta�n�ivance Ma�rt Rr•;�:rch � �, � Safety- 7 �, �� Safety-6 � I Safety-5 Safety-4 . , . Safety-3 . • , . Safetv-2 .�. O Mean Score :'. Series 1 29% 25% 24% 22% 30% 15% 25% 15% � 6% 4% 7% 12% 0 33% 13% 7/o 9% 25% - 4% 70�0 � 5% 0 30�0 10% 13% 8/0 17% 4% 0 7% 2% 4% 3% 4% _ 4% � � 39� � 3°�0 4% City Center Talbot Benson Highlands Kennydale Cedar River West Hill East Plateau o � . . . . . - . .y • • 1 • . .. ReconMR . . . _ _ , _ . . _ . . Reta�n�ivance Ma�rt Rr•;�:rch Twenty-six percent of residents gave a rating of four or less on the 1-7 safety scale when asked to rate safety in their neighborhood during the day. These respondents were asked to indicate the reasons why they don't feel completely safe. The most common mentioned concerns were theft and crime. A higher proportion of Highlands residents reported speeding/reckless driving, theft, and graffiti, compared to those who live in other areas. A higher proportion of Kennydale residents reported noise issues and lack of police presence. (n=148) respondents Vehicle or property theft 67% Crime 67% Speeding/reckless driving 52% Lack of police presence 50% Homeless encampments 48% Graffiti/Cleanliness 48% Lack of sidewalks 30% Noise or Disruption 29% Lack of lighting 22% Other (please tell us) 19% o ,� . . . . . - . ., . . i . , ,. ReconMR . _ , _ _ . _ . Reta�n�ivance Ma�rt Rr•;�:rch Overall, nighttime safety ratings in Renton neighborhoods have shifted slightly in a positive direction. The proportion of residents who feel "not safe at all" decreased from 20% in 2023 to 11 % in 2025. .. � Safety--Very safe � Safety-6 Safety-5 Safety-4 1�o�o Safety-3 2�% ,� Safety-2 � Safety-- Not safe at all 14% O Mean Score 18% 15% 18% 10% 9% 20% 11% 2023 2025 o � . . . . . - . .y • • 1 • . .. ReconMR . _ , _ � _ . � . . . . Reta�n�ivance Ma�rt Rr•;�:rch :' •� :' �� :' � Safety--Very safe 10% � Safety-6 ., � Safety- 5 :�, Safety-4 6% Safety- 3 28% � Safety-2 � � 17% 8% �6% �9% � t Safety-- Not safe at all 46% O Mean Score 38% ' � 35% 0 ° 19% 16% 16% 20% 8% 16% 18% 18% o go�a 13/o 27% 28% 18% 9% 11% 10% 16% 24% 5% 4% o 15/0 12% 13% 6% 6% 8% 6% 3% Talbot East Plateau Kennydale Benson Highlands City Center West Hill Cedar River o � . . . . . - . .y • • 1 • . .. ReconMR . . . _ _ , _ , . Reta�n�ivance Ma�rt Rr•;�:rch Fifty-six percent of residents gave a rating of four or less on the 1 -7 safety scale when asked to rate safety in their neighborhood after dark. They were then asked to indicate the reasons why they don't feel completely safe. The most common mentioned concerns were crime, speeding, and property theft. A higher proportion of Highlands residents reported crime, speeding/reckless driving, and lack of sidewalks. Of the 39 respondents who live in City Center and don't feel safe at night, 28 cited homeless encampments. n = 362 Crime 73% Speeding/reckless driving 58% Vehicle or property theft 58% Lack of police presence 45% Homeless encampments 39% Lack of lighting 38% Graffiti/Cleanliness 36% Noise or Disruption 32% Lack of sidewalks 26% Other (please tell us) 14% o ,� . . . . . - . ., . . i . , ,. ReconM R , . _ Reco�n�ivance Markrt Rr•;�:rch � � • � � Residents were asked to rate how safe they feel along Renton's trails and outdoor recreational areas. Safety ratings for parks and natural areas were higher than ratings along trails. :� ;� , � 7 -Completely safe � 7- Completely safe � 6 � 6 5 5 24% 4 � � 4 3 3 _ 2 � 2 1 - Not safe at all 25% � 1 - Not safe at all �$% O Mean Score O Mean Score 17% 13% 6% 13% 13% 5% 6% Safety along Safety in Renton's Renton's trails parks and natural areas o � . . . . . - . .y • • 1 • . .. ReconMR , , _ � _ . � . . . . Reta�n�ivance Ma�rt Rr•;�:rch , � .� �� ;,, � Safety-- Completely safe • � Safety-6 Safety- 5 Safety-4 � '. � 24% Safety- 3 24% 18% Safety-2 � 29% 32% � Safety-- Not safe at all OMean Score 25% 17% 17% : 22% 11% � 13% 32% 16% 31% 23% 12% 14% 9% 34% � 11% 12% 7% 4% 3% 15% � 8% 28% 15% 6% 30�0 17% 21% 0 14% ° 7% 4% West Hill City Center Highlands Talbot Kennydale Benson Cedar River East Plateau o � . . . . . - . .y • • 1 • . .. ReconMR - , , _ . _ . . . . . . Reta�n�ivance Ma�rt Rr•;�:rch �, .� �� Safety-- Completely safe � Safety-6 • Safety- 5 23% Safety-4 34% 33% Safety- 3 � : , � � Safety-2 38% � � Safety-- Not safe at all 26% 19% � ' Series 1 210�0 3g��o O Mean Score 35% 23% 15% 13% 16% 16% 0 24% 7% 16/o ° 5/o 14% 6% 13% � 7% 8% 11% 17% 9% 5% ' � o 3% 11% 3% 8% 30�0 7% 5%� � 4%� � 4% 3o/p � West Hill City Center Highlands Benson Kennydale Cedar River Talbot East Plateau o � . . . . . - . .y • • 1 • . .. ReconMR . . . _ _ , _ , , , , . , Reta�n�ivance Ma�rt Rr•;�:rch When asked to rate safety along Renton's trails, 51 % of residents gave a rating of 4 or less on the 1-7 scale. For parks, this proportion was slightly less, with 38% giving a less than favorable rating. The most common mentioned concerns were crime and homeless encampments. City Center residents were more likely to cite homeless encampments. n = 332 Crime 70% Homeless encampments 62% Vehicle or property theft 45% Graffiti/Cleanliness 41% Lack of police presence 40% Lack of lighting 28% Speeding/reckless driving 27% Noise or Disruption 19% Lack of sidewalks _11% Other (please tell us) _9% o ,� . . . . . - . , . . i . , ,. Reco �� (,�'(Y O� + + Study questions or want more info? 'Q�c N T p� City of Renton - 2025 Community Survey Contact Ryan Spencer at ReconMR . , , � . _ _ Reta�n�ivance Ma�rt Rr•;�:rch Nearly one half of respondents contacted a city employee within the past year. These interactions mostly took place in person. In the past 12 months, have you or anyone in your household had contact with an employee of the City of Renton? Mode of most recent contact No: 47% In person 56% Phone 21% Don't know: 6% Email 9% Renton Responds/SeeClickFix 10% Other (Please specify) 4% Yes: 47% o ,� . . . . . - . , . . i . , ,. ReconMR - _ , . . . , Reta�n�ivance Ma�rt Rr•;�:rch The most common reason for contacting a city employee was in regards to parks and recreation, events, and permitting/licensing. The most common "other" answers centered around reporting crimes such as graffiti and noise violations, inquiries related to city infrastructure and utilities such as tree removal, street sweeping, and water main leaks, and requests for stop signs, changes to traffic light timing at intersections, and other traffic improvement and traffic calming requests. What was the reason for this most recent contact? Parks, recreation, or city events 20% Permitting and licensing 16% Code enforcement (junk cars, dilapidated properties) 10% Discussions with elected officials 10% Utilities 9% Law enforcement 7% Health and safety 3% Animal Control 3% Encampments 2% Transportation 2% Neighborhood services 0% Code enforcement 0% Other (Please specify) �7% o ,� . . . . . - . , . . i . , ,. ReconMR . _ _ _ - , . � � . Reta�n�ivance Ma�rt Rr•;�:rch City of Renton employees are knowledgable, responsive, and courteous. The vast majority of residents who interact with city employees walk away with a positive impression. Ratings are consistent with 2023. . � . � ; � � 7- Excellent � 6 5 4 3 2 � 1 -Very poor �,. O Mean Score 11% 13% 15% 15% 16% 12% 9% 0 9% 9% 3% 20�0 4% 3% 3% 4% � 4% � 5% � Overall impression Friendliness and Overall customer Overall knowledge Responsiveness courteousness service o � . . . . . - . .y • • 1 • . ..