HomeMy WebLinkAboutSTAFF REPORT_D253_RMF-2 Rezone with Comp Plan Amendment
Community & Economic Development // Planning Division
STAFF REPORT
#D-253: RMF-2 Rezone with Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Staff: Angelea Weihs, Senior Planner, aweihs@rentonwa.gov, 425-430-7312
Date: June 12, 2026
Applicant or Requestor: Staff
GENERAL DESCRIPTION
The City of Renton proposes zoning map amendments and corresponding Comprehensive Plan map
amendments for two (2) geographically distinct sites (See Attachment A – Exhibit 1). Site 1 is located
at SW Sunset Blvd & Maple Ave SW, within the City Center Community Planning Area. Site 2 is located
at 433 & 450 Bremerton Ave NE, within the Highlands Community Planning Area. The proposal would
rezone properties currently zoned Commercial Arterial (CA) to Residential Multi-Family 2 (RMF-2).
Concurrently, the Comprehensive Plan land use designation for each site would be amended from
Commercial Mixed Use (CMU) to Residential High Density (RHD).
The RMF-2 zone allows residential densities of approximately 20 to 40 dwelling units per net acre and
is intended for areas with existing attached residential development or where conditions support
more intensive multi-unit housing near transit, commercial services, and employment areas.
The purpose of the proposal is to:
• Facilitate infill development on underutilized parcels, including properties where
commercial viability is limited or impractical due to site constraints;
• Encourage redevelopment of nonconforming uses; and
• Support housing growth in areas with proximity to transit and existing infrastructure.
PROPOSAL SUMMARY
The following table summarizes the proposed rezone sites, including general location, community
planning area, proximity to major transit service, and existing and proposed zoning and
Comprehensive Plan designations. Both sites are proposed for rezone to Residential Multi-Family 2
(RMF-2) with a corresponding Comprehensive Plan amendment from Commercial Mixed Use (CMU)
to Residential High Density (RHD).
Site General Location
Community
Planning
Area
Distance
To Transit
Stop
Existing
Zoning
Proposed
Zoning
Existing Comp
Plan
Designation
Proposed
Comp Plan
Designation
1 SW Sunset Blvd & Maple Ave SW City Center 0.00 miles CA RMF-2 CMU RHD
2 433 & 450
Bremerton Ave NE Highlands 0.32 miles CA RMF-2 CMU RHD
#D-253 Page 2 of 18 June 12, 2026
CRITERIA FOR REZONES REQUIRING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
RMC 4-9-020.F Review Criteria or the Comprehensive Plan Adoption and Amendment Process lists
three (3) review criteria for Comprehensive Plan Amendments. The three (3) criteria are as follows:
1. All Comprehensive Plan amendments will be evaluated on their merits based upon the following:
a. The effect upon the rate of growth, development, and conversion of land as envisioned in
the Comprehensive Plan;
b. The effect upon the City’s capacity to provide adequate public facilities;
c. The effect upon the rate of population and employment growth;
d. Whether Comprehensive Plan objectives are being met as specified or remain valid and
desirable;
e. The effect upon general land values and housing costs;
f. Whether capital improvements or expenditures, including transportation, are being made or
completed as expected;
g. Whether the initiated amendment conforms to the requirements of the GMA, is internally
consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, and is consistent with the County-wide Planning
Policies for King County;
h. The effect upon critical areas and natural resource lands;
i. Consistency with locational criteria in the Comprehensive Plan and application
requirements established in this section;
j. Consistency with the policies set forth in the Comprehensive Plan;
k. The effect upon other considerations as deemed necessary by the Department.
2. All applications must meet at least one of the following criteria:
a. The request supports the vision embodied in the Comprehensive Plan; or
b. The request supports the adopted business plan goals established by the City Council; or
c. The request eliminates conflicts with existing elements or policies; or
d. The request amends the Comprehensive Plan to accommodate new policy directives of
the City Council.
3. Proposals that include a concurrent rezone proposal shall also comply with the decision criteria
for a change of zone classification in RMC 4-9-180.
CRITERION 1 ANALYSIS
Per RMC 4-9-020.F.1, all Comprehensive Plan amendments are evaluated on their merits based
upon the following:
a. The effect upon the rate of growth, development, and conversion of land as envisioned in the
Comprehensive Plan;
#D-253 Page 3 of 18 June 12, 2026
The proposed amendments do not alter the overall rate of growth anticipated in the Comprehensive
Plan. Instead, they provide consistency between existing development patterns and zoning
regulations, facilitating infill and reinvestment on underutilized parcels in line with the City’s planned
growth strategy.
b. The effect upon the City’s capacity to provide adequate public facilities;
No adverse effects are anticipated. All sites are already served by existing infrastructure, including
water, sewer, and transportation facilities. Aligning zoning with existing development reduces
uncertainty and allows the City to plan capital improvements more efficiently, consistent with
adopted level-of-service standards.
c. The effect upon the rate of population and employment growth;
The proposed rezonings will not accelerate regional growth beyond adopted targets but will help
direct anticipated population increases to areas designated for higher-density housing. This
improves the City’s ability to meet its growth allocation under the Growth Management Act (GMA)
without dispersing growth into lower-density areas.
d. Whether Comprehensive Plan objectives are being met as specified or remain valid and
desirable;
The amendments support Comprehensive Plan objectives related to infill development, efficient
land use, and directing growth to transit-served areas by aligning zoning with existing development
patterns. The objectives remain valid and desirable, and the rezonings further their implementation
by reinforcing Residential High Density policies.
e. The effect upon general land values and housing costs;
The rezonings are not expected to significantly increase land values or housing costs. By aligning
zoning with existing conditions and facilitating infill on vacant and underutilized parcels, the
amendments provide opportunities to add housing capacity without displacing existing
development. This supports predictable growth and contributes to a broader range of housing
options, consistent with affordability goals.
f. Whether capital improvements or expenditures, including transportation, are being made or
completed as expected;
The amendments do not trigger new capital facility demands, as infrastructure and services are
already established in these areas. Aligning zoning with existing built densities supports efficient use
of current public investments and planned infrastructure.
g. Whether the initiated amendment conforms to the requirements of the GMA, is internally
consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, and is consistent with the County-wide Planning
Policies for King County;
The proposed rezonings are consistent with the Growth Management Act and King County
Countywide Planning Policies. They direct growth to designated high-density areas, support
compact development, reduce vehicle miles traveled, and promote efficient land use within
Regional and Countywide Growth Centers.
h. The effect upon critical areas and natural resource lands;
#D-253 Page 4 of 18 June 12, 2026
No adverse effects are anticipated. All sites are within the urban area and are already developed or
previously disturbed. Critical areas are regulated by existing City development standards, which will
continue to apply.
i. Consistency with locational criteria in the Comprehensive Plan and application requirements
established in this section;
The proposed amendments are consistent with the locational criteria for the Residential High
Density (RHD) designation. RHD applies to areas with access to transit, urban services, and
infrastructure, and where existing development patterns support attached residential housing and
infill opportunities.
Both sites are located within approximately 0.00 to 0.32 miles of a major transit stop and are served
by existing infrastructure. The sites are located along or near arterial and collector roadways and are
in proximity to services and employment areas.
The sites contain one or more of the following:
• Existing multi-family development,
• Underutilized or vacant parcels,
• Limited or constrained commercial development potential, or
• Residential uses that are nonconforming under CA zoning.
The RMF-2 zone is intended for areas with existing multi-unit development and capacity for
additional density in transit-served locations.
The proposed amendments meet these locational criteria.
j. Consistency with the policies set forth in the Comprehensive Plan;
The proposed amendments are consistent with Comprehensive Plan policies supporting infill
development, efficient land use, and directing residential growth to areas with existing infrastructure
and access to transit.
The proposal:
• Aligns zoning and land use designations with existing development patterns;
• Reduces nonconforming uses and split zoning conditions; and
• Facilitates redevelopment of underutilized parcels.
While the Commercial Mixed Use (CMU) designation is intended to support mixed-use
redevelopment, the subject sites exhibit existing development patterns and site constraints that
limit the practicality of achieving that objective.
Applying the Residential High Density designation better reflects existing conditions and supports
anticipated development patterns.
k. The effect upon other considerations as deemed necessary by the Department.
The Department of Community and Economic Development has not identified any additional
considerations.
CRITERION 2 ANALYSIS
#D-253 Page 5 of 18 June 12, 2026
Per RMC 4-9-020.F.2, all applications must meet at least one of the following criteria:
a. The request supports the vision embodied in the Comprehensive Plan; or
b. The request supports the adopted business plan goals established by the City Council; or
c. The request eliminates conflicts with existing elements or policies; or
d. The request amends the Comprehensive Plan to accommodate new policy directives of
the City Council.
Staff Comment:
The proposed amendments meet Criterion 2(a), as they support the vision embodied in the
Comprehensive Plan by aligning land use designations and zoning with existing development
patterns and directing residential growth to appropriate urban locations.
The Residential High Density (RHD) land use designation applies to areas where access and
surrounding conditions support a range of housing types, including multi-family development, and
where infill opportunities exist near transit and services. The RMF-2 zone implements this
designation and is intended for areas with existing multi-unit development or where additional
density is appropriate.
Policy LU-15 and Policy LU-16 provide direction for the application of the Residential High Density
(RHD) and Commercial Mixed Use (CMU) designations, as follows:
• Policy LU-15: Residential High Density (RHD) – Apply to lands where access, topography,
and adjacent land uses create conditions appropriate for a variety of housing unit types,
support cost-efficient housing, facilitate infill development, have close access to transit
service, and efficiently use urban services and infrastructure.
• Policy LU-16: Commercial Mixed Use (CMU) – Apply to lands with established commercial
and office uses near principal arterials and support redevelopment of strip commercial areas
into cohesive mixed-use districts through the maximization of uses and coordinated site
planning.
The subject sites exhibit characteristics consistent with Policy LU-15. The subject sites are located
within approximately 0.00 to 0.32 miles of a major transit stop, are served by existing infrastructure,
and include a mix of multi-family housing, nonconforming residential uses, and underutilized
parcels.
While currently designated CMU, the subject sites do not exhibit development patterns consistent
with Policy LU-16. The properties have not developed with the level of commercial intensity,
coordinated site planning, or mixed-use character anticipated under the CMU designation.
Furthermore, site characteristics such as shallow lot depth, anticipated right-of-way dedication, and
site topography limit the feasibility of redevelopment consistent with a coordinated mixed-use
corridor.
The proposed amendments advance these policies by:
• Aligning zoning and land use designations with existing development patterns where mixed-
use development is not occurring;
• Reducing nonconforming uses and split zoning conditions; and
#D-253 Page 6 of 18 June 12, 2026
• Facilitating infill development on underutilized parcels in transit-served areas where site
constraints limit viable mixed-use redevelopment.
Collectively, the proposal supports the Comprehensive Plan by applying the RHD designation in
locations where it is most appropriate and consistent with existing and anticipated development
patterns.
CRITERION 3 ANALYSIS
Per RMC 4-9-020.F.3, proposals that include a concurrent rezone proposal shall also comply with
the decision criteria for a change of zone classification in RMC 4-9-180.
Because this proposal requires a Comprehensive Plan Amendment, it is governed by RMC 4-9-
180.F.1, which subjects the rezone to the Comprehensive Plan Amendment review process. To
satisfy the site-specific requirements of a zone change and avoid circular logic, the proposal is
further evaluated against the substantive standards of RMC 4-9-180.F.2 and the required findings
for a rezone.
The proposed rezonings meet the decision criteria for a change of zone classification in RMC 4-9-
180.F.2, as follows:
a. The rezone has merit and value for the community, and will not adversely affect public
health, safety, and welfare;
The proposed rezonings have merit and value for the community by enabling additional housing
capacity in transit-served areas and aligning zoning with existing development patterns. The
proposal reduces nonconforming uses and facilitates reinvestment and infill on underutilized
parcels without adversely affecting public health, safety, or welfare.
b. The rezone will not be materially detrimental to the uses or properties located in the
immediate vicinity thereof;
The surrounding areas include a mix of multi-family residential, single-family residential, and low-
intensity commercial uses. The RMF-2 zone is compatible with this context, reflects existing multi-
family development patterns, and does not introduce a level of intensity beyond what is already
present or established in the surrounding area.
c. Since the original zoning or most recent rezone of the subject property, conditions affecting
the subject property have substantially changed as a result of, but not limited to, public
improvements or permitted private development;
Conditions affecting the subject properties have changed since the original zoning, including the
development of multi-family housing within commercially zoned areas, persistence of
nonconforming residential uses, and limited commercial reinvestment on certain parcels. These
changes support a transition from commercial to residential zoning.
d. The property subject to rezone was not specifically considered for a rezone at the time of
the last area land use analysis and area zoning;
The subject properties were not specifically considered for a rezone at the time of the last area-
wide land use analysis and zoning. This proposal reflects updated site-specific analysis of existing
development patterns, parcel configuration, and redevelopment constraints.
e. The characteristics of development upon the land subject to the rezone application are
compatible with the purpose and intent of the proposed zone as well as the zone-specific
policy of the proposed zone, as provided by the Comprehensive Plan; and
#D-253 Page 7 of 18 June 12, 2026
Existing development on the subject sites is already generally consistent with RMF-2 development
patterns, and remaining underutilized parcels are capable of redevelopment at similar intensity
based on lot configuration, access, surrounding development, and available infrastructure. The
proposed zoning is consistent with the purpose and intent of the RMF-2 zone and the Residential
High Density designation.
f. The rezone does not conflict with the governing Community Plan, if one was adopted for the
Community Planning Area in which the property subject to the rezone is located.
Site 1 is located within the City Center Community Planning Area, which has an adopted
Community Plan. The proposed rezone and corresponding Comprehensive Plan map amendment
are consistent with the City Center Community Plan by supporting residential development in
proximity to transit, services, employment opportunities, and existing urban infrastructure.
Site 2 is located within the Highlands Community Planning Area, which does not have an adopted
Community Plan. Therefore, this criterion is not applicable to Site 2.
SITE 1 – SW SUNSET BLVD & MAPLE AVE SW
SITE DESCRIPTION:
Site 1 is located at the intersection of SW Sunset Blvd and Maple Ave SW within the City Center
Community Planning Area (See Attachment A – Exhibit 3). The site is located west of the Fred Meyer
store on Rainier Avenue South and includes multiple parcels totaling approximately 1.63 acres. The
site is currently developed with a mix of nonconforming commercial and residential uses, including
auto sales, dog grooming/daycare services, single-family residential development, and vacant
properties. Existing development within the site reflects a fragmented pattern of low-intensity
commercial activity and residential occupancy that is inconsistent with the long-term intent of the
Commercial Mixed Use (CMU) designation and Commercial Arterial (CA) zoning district. The City
also received a request from the property owner to rezone Site 1 to RMF-2 (See Attachment B).
The site is located directly on a major King County Metro transit stop and is served by existing urban
infrastructure, including transit, utilities, and arterial roadway access. Surrounding development
includes a mix of commercial uses along SW Sunset Blvd, multi-family residential development, and
other urban residential uses within the City Center area. The site functions as a transitional area
between commercial corridor activity and surrounding residential development.
The existing zoning of the site is Commercial Arterial (CA) with a Commercial Mixed Use (CMU)
Comprehensive Plan land use designation. The proposed rezone would change the zoning
designation to Residential Multi-Family 2 (RMF-2), with a corresponding Comprehensive Plan map
amendment to Residential High Density (RHD). The proposed amendments would align the zoning
and land use designations with existing development patterns and facilitate future infill residential
development in proximity to transit, services, and employment areas.
PARCEL TABLE:
The following table provides parcel-specific information including addresses, current uses, year
built, and existing zoning.
Parcel Number Address Current Use Year
Built Density Current
Zone
#D-253 Page 8 of 18 June 12, 2026
SITE-SPECIFIC JUSTIFICATION:
The following justification identifies the planning principles and site-specific conditions that support
the proposed rezone from Commercial Arterial (CA) to Residential Multi-Family 2 (RMF-2). These
factors demonstrate how the rezone is consistent with Comprehensive Plan policies, surrounding
land use patterns, and citywide housing objectives.
• Limited Commercial Redevelopment Potential: Site characteristics, including shallow lot
depth, parcel configuration, existing development patterns, and anticipated right-of-way
dedication along SW Sunset Blvd, limit the practicality of redevelopment consistent with the
Commercial Mixed Use (CMU) designation and Commercial Arterial (CA) zoning objectives. The
proposed rezone better reflects existing site conditions and anticipated long-term development
patterns.
• Infill Housing Opportunity: The site contains underutilized parcels and nonconforming
residential uses capable of supporting additional multi-family residential development within an
urbanized area served by existing infrastructure and services. Rezoning to RMF-2 would facilitate
infill residential redevelopment and support City housing targets.
• Transit Access: The site has direct access to a major King County Metro transit service, providing
access to local and regional transit connections. Higher-density residential zoning at this
location supports transit-oriented development principles by encouraging housing growth in
areas with access to public transportation and existing infrastructure.
• Consistency with Surrounding Development: Surrounding development includes commercial
corridor uses, multi-family residential development, and urban residential neighborhoods within
the City Center area. The proposed RMF-2 zoning is compatible with the surrounding
development pattern and would reinforce the existing residential character present within
portions of the site and surrounding vicinity while maintaining proximity to services and
employment areas.
• Reduction of Nonconforming Uses: Portions of the site contain existing residential uses that
are nonconforming under the current Commercial Arterial (CA) zoning designation. The
proposed rezone would reduce zoning nonconformities by aligning the zoning designation more
closely with the established residential-oriented development pattern.
SITE 2 – 433 & 450 BREMERTON AVE NE
2143700030 420 Lind Ave SW Single-Family 1946 NA (1-Unit) CA
2143700011 420 Lind Ave SW Vacant NA NA CA
2143700012 420 Lind Ave SW Vacant NA NA CA
2143700055 315 SW Sunset Blvd Nonconforming Auto Sales and
Single-Family
1930 NA CA
2143700021 215 SW Sunset Blvd Nonconforming Auto Sales 1913 NA CA
2143700019 203 SW Sunset Blvd Nonconforming Fuzzy Friends Dog
Grooming & Doggie Daycare Inc
1946 NA CA
#D-253 Page 9 of 18 June 12, 2026
SITE DESCRIPTION:
Site 2 is located at 433 and 450 Bremerton Ave NE within the Highlands Community Planning Area
and Commercial Arterial (CA) Zone (See Attachment A – Exhibit 5). The site includes four parcels
totaling approximately 2.5 acres and is currently developed with multi-family residential uses,
associated surface parking areas, and vacant property. The site has limited access and visibility from
the NE 4th St arterial corridor, and the surrounding development pattern is predominantly residential
in character. As a result, the site has limited potential for redevelopment consistent with the
Commercial Mixed Use (CMU) designation and Commercial Arterial (CA) zoning objectives.
The site is located approximately 0.32 miles from a major King County Metro transit stop, providing
access to local and regional transit service. Surrounding development includes a mix of multi-family
residential uses, commercial development along NE 4th St., and institutional and service-oriented
uses within the broader Highlands area. The site is situated along Bremerton Ave NE in an area
characterized by existing residential development patterns and established urban infrastructure.
The existing zoning of the site is Commercial Arterial (CA) with a Commercial Mixed Use (CMU)
Comprehensive Plan land use designation. The proposed rezone would change the zoning
designation to Residential Multi-Family 2 (RMF-2), with a corresponding Comprehensive Plan
amendment to Residential High Density (RHD). The proposed amendments would align the zoning
and land use designations with the existing residential-oriented development pattern and support
future infill residential development in proximity to transit and services.
PARCEL TABLE:
The following table provides parcel-specific information including addresses, current uses, year
built, and existing zoning.
SITE-SPECIFIC JUSTIFICATION:
The following justification identifies the planning principles and site-specific conditions that support
the proposed rezone from Commercial Arterial (CA) to Residential Multi-Family 2 (RMF-2). These
factors demonstrate how the rezone is consistent with Comprehensive Plan policies, surrounding
land use patterns, and citywide housing objectives.
• Limited Commercial Redevelopment Potential: Site characteristics, including parcel
configuration, shallow lot depth, and the surrounding residential context, limit the
practicality of redevelopment consistent with the Commercial Mixed Use (CMU) designation
and Commercial Arterial (CA) zoning objectives. The proposed rezone better reflects existing
site conditions and anticipated long-term development patterns.
PARCEL
NUMBER
ADDRESS CURRENT USE YEAR
BUILT
DENSITY CURRENT
ZONE
1023059066 450 Bremerton Ave NE Vision House Multifamily
Housing
2004 21
DU/ACRE
CA
1023059065 450 Bremerton Ave NE Vision House Multifamily
Housing
2004 16
DU/ACRE
CA
1023059086 450 Bremerton Ave NE Vision House (Vacant) NA NA CA
1023059054 433 Bremerton Ave NE Vision House (Vacant) Vacant NA CA
#D-253 Page 10 of 18 June 12, 2026
• Infill Housing Opportunity: The site includes developed and underutilized areas capable of
supporting additional multi-family residential development in an urbanized area with existing
infrastructure and services. Rezoning to RMF-2 would facilitate future residential
reinvestment and support City housing targets through infill development.
• Transit Access: The site is located 0.32 miles from a major King County Metro transit service,
providing access to local and regional transit connections. Higher-density residential zoning
at this location supports transit-oriented development principles by encouraging housing
growth in areas with access to public transportation and existing infrastructure.
• Consistency with Surrounding Development: Surrounding development includes multi-
family residential uses, institutional and service-oriented uses, and commercial
development along the NE 4th St. corridor. The proposed RMF-2 zoning is compatible with
the surrounding development pattern and would reinforce the existing residential character
of the area while maintaining proximity to neighborhood services and employment areas.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the proposed zoning map amendments and corresponding
Comprehensive Plan amendments for two (2) geographically distinct sites currently zoned
Commercial Arterial (CA) with a Commercial Mixed Use (CMU) Comprehensive Plan land use
designation, to Residential Multi-Family 2 (RMF-2) and Residential High Density (RHD), respectively.
The proposed amendments are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, support citywide housing
objectives, and meet the applicable criteria for Comprehensive Plan amendments and rezones
under RMC 4-9-020 and RMC 4-9-180.F.2. Adoption of the proposed amendments would reduce
zoning inconsistencies, facilitate higher-density infill development in appropriate urban locations,
and support long-term housing growth in areas with access to transit, services, and existing
infrastructure.
#D-253 Page 11 of 18 June 12, 2026
Attachment A – Exhibit 1
RMF-2 Rezone Map
SITE 1
SITE 2
LEGEND
REZONE TO RMF-2
RESIDENTIAL INDUSTRIAL
RC IL
R-1 IM
R-4 IH
R-6 COMMERCIAL
R-8 CN
R-10 CV
R-14 CA
RMF CD
RMF-2 CO
RMH COR
UC-1
UC-2
#D-253 Page 12 of 18 June 12, 2026
Attachment A – Exhibit 2
RMF-2 Comprehensive Plan Map
Amendment
SITE 1
SITE 2
#D-253 Page 13 of 18 June 12, 2026
COMMUNITY
PLANNING AREA
DISTANCE TO
MAJOR TRANSIT
STOP
EXISTING
ZONING PROPOSED
ZONING
City Center 0.00 miles CA RMF-2
Attachment A – Exhibit 3
SITE 1 – SW Sunset Blvd & Maple Ave SW
Rezone Map
LEGEND
REZONE TO RMF-2
RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL
R-8 CN
R-10 CV
R-14 CA
RMF CD
RMF-2 CO
Single
Family Vacant
Auto Sales
Single Family
Auto Sales
Dog
Grooming/
Daycare
#D-253 Page 14 of 18 June 12, 2026
COMMUNITY
PLANNING
AREA
DISTANCE TO
MAJOR
TRANSIT STOP
EXISTING
COMP PLAN
DESIGNATION
PROPOSED
COMP PLAN
DESIGNATION
City Center 0.00 miles CMU RHD
Attachment A – Exhibit 4
SITE 1 – SW Sunset Blvd & Maple Ave SW
Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment
LEGEND
Comprehensive Plan Map
Amendment
Comprehensive Land Use
Commercial & Mixed Use (CMU)
Commercial Office Residential (COR)
Employment Area (EA)
Residential Low Density (RLD)
Residential Medium Density (RMD)
Residential High Density (RHD)
#D-253 Page 15 of 18 June 12, 2026
Vision House Transitional Housing
COMMUNITY
PLANNING AREA
DISTANCE TO
MAJOR TRANSIT
STOP
EXISTING
ZONING PROPOSED
ZONING
Highlands 0.32 CA RMF-2
Attachment A – Exhibit 5
SITE 2 – 433 & 450 Bremerton Ave NE
Rezone Map
LEGEND
REZONE TO RMF-2
RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL
R-8 CN
R-10 CV
R-14 CA
RMF CD
RMF-2 CO
Vision House
Transitional Housing
Vacant
Vacant
#D-253 Page 16 of 18 June 12, 2026
COMMUNITY
PLANNING
AREA
DISTANCE TO
MAJOR
TRANSIT STOP
EXISTING
COMP PLAN
DESIGNATION
PROPOSED
COMP PLAN
DESIGNATION
City Center 0.00 miles CMU RHD
Attachment A – Exhibit 6
SITE 2 – 433 & 450 Bremerton Ave NE
Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment
#D-253 Page 17 of 18 June 12, 2026
From: Campbell Mathewson <cmathewson@cmrepartners.com>
Sent: Friday, May 8, 2026 1:20 PM
To: Angie Mathias <AMathias@Rentonwa.gov>
Cc: Matthew Herrera <MHerrera@Rentonwa.gov>; Clark Close <CClose@Rentonwa.gov>
Subject: Rezone request: 425 Maple Ave SW
Hi Angie. I hope you are well. This email is intended to provide a formal request for a rezone of the
property owned by my family located at 425 Maple Ave SW, more specifically identified in the table
below. My grandparents lived on this property for many decades and it is where my father, Kirk
Mathewson, grew up. Since 2019 we have unsuccessfully attempted to redevelop the property
under the current CA zone. Unfortunately, the commercial requirement has hindered our ability
because the market simply hasn’t been there to support its use. As you may know, the immediate
neighborhood is comprised of dense residential uses including many parcels that were recently
rezoned to RMF-2. The commercial uses that are nearby are very dilapidated in nature. For these
reasons, and since significant commercial is available in the Fred Meyer shopping center within
walking distance to the east, we respectfully request a rezone for the six properties below from CA
to RMF-2. Please let me know if you have any questions or require additional information.
Parcel
Number
Address Bldg SF Land SF Land Acre Owner Current
Zoning
Requested
Zoning
Renton, WA
214370-
0030-03
420 Lind Ave SW 1,285 9,300 0.21 Ditty
Properties LP
CA RMF-2
214370-0011 313 SW Sunset
Blvd
5,995 0.14 Ditty
Properties LP
CA RMF-2
214370-
0012-05
315 SW Sunset
Blvd
6,650 0.15 R. Kirk
Mathewson
CA RMF-2
214370-
0055-03
425 Maple / 315
SW Sunset Blvd
1,250 25,850 0.59 R. Kirk
Mathewson
CA RMF-2
214370-
0021-04
215 SW Sunset
Blvd
4,538 17,190 0.39 Ditty
Properties LP
CA RMF-2
CAUTION: This email originated from outside the City of Renton. Do not click links, reply or open
attachments unless you know the content is safe.
Attachment B
Property Owner Request
#D-253 Page 18 of 18 June 12, 2026
214370-
0019-08
203 SW Sunset
Blvd
2,304 5,836 0.13 Ditty
Properties LP
CA RMF-2
70,821
1.63
Sincerely,
Campbell Mathewson | Vice President | Ditty Properties, Inc., the General Partner of Ditty
Properties LP
& Authorized Representative for R. Kirk Mathewson
11647 NE 8th Street, Bellevue, WA 98005
M 206.910.2448 | E cmathewson@cmrepartners.com