Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutFinal Agenda Packet AGENDA City Council Regular Meeting 7:00 PM - Monday, August 6, 2018 Council Chambers, 7th Floor, City Hall – 1055 S. Grady Way 1. CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. ROLL CALL 3. PROCLAMATION a) Farmers Market Week - August 5 - 11, 2018 4. SPECIAL PRESENTATION a) Department of Commerce GSCA Award Presentation for Sartori Elementary School b) 2018 Planning Awards Program Presentation: Comprehensive Plan-large City Award for Civic Core Vision and Action Plan c) Public Safety Outcomes of 4th of July activities - updated from RPD & RRFA 5. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT 6. AUDIENCE COMMENTS • Speakers must sign-up prior to the Council meeting. • Each speaker is allowed five minutes. • When recognized, please state your name & city of residence for the record. NOTICE to all participants: Pursuant to state law, RCW 42.17A.555, campaigning for any ballot measure or candidate in City Hall and/or during any portion of the council meeting, including the audience comment portion of the meeting, is PROHIBITED. 7. CONSENT AGENDA The following items are distributed to Councilmembers in advance for study and review, and the recommended actions will be accepted in a single motion. Any item may be removed for further discussion if requested by a Councilmember. a) Approval of Council Meeting minutes of July 16, 2018. Council Concur b) AB - 2192 City Clerk reports appeal of the Hearing Examiner's final decision regarding the Wilson Park 1 Preliminary Plat (LUA-09-140) filed by Robert & Doravin Wilson, accompanied by required fee. The consideration of the closed record appeal by the City Council shall be based solely upon the record, the Hearing Examiner's report, the notice of appeal and additional arguments based on the record by parties (RMC 4-8-110.F.6.). (No new evidence or testimony allowed.) Refer to Planning & Development Committee c) AB - 2194 City Clerk reports the results from the July 31, 2018 bid opening for the Falcon Ridge Lift Station Replacement and Force Main Improvements project to Road Construction Northwest, Inc., in the amount of $926,502.50; and transfer $250,000 from the Thunder Hill Interceptor Rehabilitation project to this project to cover the budget gap. Refer to Utilities Committee d) AB - 2184 Administrative Services Department requests authorization to execute the En Point Technology purchase order in the amount of $157,730.17 for the renewal of Microsoft Enterprise Licenses True-up. Refer to Finance Committee e) AB - 2187 Administrative Services Department requests approval to execute Consortium Project Agreement 73, an interlocal agreement with the members of the Community Connectivity Consortium, regarding the Eastside Rail Corridor (ERC) fiber optic feasibility study. City of Renton share of the cost is $10,000. Refer to Finance Committee f) AB - 2189 Administrative Services Department recommends adopting a resolution to amend Resolution 4217, to revoke the City's former Administrative Services Administrator's permissions to make amendments, changes, and alterations to the "Local Government Investment Pool (LGIP) Transaction Authorization Form" and authorize the Administrative Services Administrator, by title, to make the appropriate amendments, changes and alterations to said form. Council Concur g) AB - 2180 Police Department recommends adoption of an ordinance that repeals and replaces Renton Municipal Code 6-3 that updates language and processes needed to support a modern burglar alarm reduction program, including holding alarm users responsible for their use of alarm systems. Refer to Public Safety Committee h) AB - 2185 Transportation Systems Division submits the Main Ave S (S 3rd St to Mill Ave S) project; and recommends acceptance of the project subject to receiving the required certifications. Council Concur i) AB - 2188 Transportation Systems Division recommends adopting a resolution authorizing the temporary complete closure of East Valley Road between 1701 East Valley Road and 2501 East Valley Road and SW 19th St. between 200 SW 19th St. and 204 SW 19th St. for up to four calendar days between August 24 and August 27, 2018 to construct the Rolling Hills Creek Culvert crossing as part of the I-405/SR 167 Interchange Direct Connector project. Refer to Transportation (Aviation) Committee j) AB - 2190 Transportation Systems Division Department requests ratification of the Indemnification Agreement and First Addendum with The Boeing Company allowing them to occupy a portion of Renton Municipal Airport's Taxiway "B" for up to 90 days. Council Concur k) AB - 2191 Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a resolution to adopt the annual updates to the 2019-2024 Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program. Refer to Transportation (Aviation) Committee; Set Public Hearing on 8/20/2018 l) AB - 2181 Utility Systems Division recommends approval of Change Order No. 1 to CAG- 17-174, with Laser Underground & Earthworks, Inc., in the amount of $302,406.79, for the rebuilding of Cedar Ave S. Refer to Utilities Committee m) AB - 2186 Utility Systems Division recommends approval of an agreement with Murraysmith, Inc., in the amount of $683,735, for design services for Phase 2 of the Downtown Utility Improvement project. Refer to Utilities Committee 8. UNFINISHED BUSINESS Topics listed below were discussed in Council committees during the past week. Those topics marked with an asterisk (*) may include legislation. Committee reports on any topics may be held by the Chair if further review is necessary. a) Committee of the Whole: CAC Polling Report 9. LEGISLATION Resolution: a) Resolution No. 4349: Authorized Individual Delegated to Administer City Monies in the Local Government Investment Pool (LGIP) 10. NEW BUSINESS (Includes Council Committee agenda topics; visit rentonwa.gov/cityclerk for more information.) 11. ADJOURNMENT COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING AGENDA (Preceding Council Meeting) 5:00 p.m. - 7th Floor - Conferencing Center Hearing assistance devices for use in the Council Chambers are available upon request to the City Clerk CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS ARE TELEVISED LIVE ON GOVERNMENT ACCESS CHANNEL 21 To view Council Meetings online, please visit rentonwa.gov/councilmeetings DenisLawMayorWfiereas,Washington’sfarmersmakeanessentialcontributiontoourlocalcommunitiesandtothewell-beingofourcitizens;andWfiereas,theRentonFarmersMarketiscelebratingitsseventeenthyearofoperation,openeachTuesdayfromJunethroughSeptemberfrom3:00to7:00p.m.inRenton’sbeautifulDowntownPiazzaPark;andW’fiereas,theFarmersMarketprograminRentonisdedicatedtosupportingWashington’sfamilyfarmsandtoprovidingopportunitiesforthecitizensofRentonandsurroundingcommunitiestomeetlocalproducersandgainaccesstothebountyofWashington-grownproductsinalltheirdiversity,freshfromfamilyfarms;andWtzereas,theFarmersMarketbenefitslocalbusinessesandcontributestoeconomicvitalitybyattractingthousandsofpatronseachweek;andWfiereas,theFarmersMarketbenefitscommunitymembersexperiencingfoodinsecuritybyprovidingaccessandincentivesforthoseusingfoodassistanceprograms,anddonatingtothelocalfoodbank;and‘14)fiereas,thecongenialatmosphereoftheFarmersMarketinRentonappealstocitizensofallagesandbackgrounds,createsapositivesocialexperience,andprovidesnutritionalandeconomicbenefits;Wow,tñerefore,I,DenisLaw,MayoroftheCityofRenton,doherebyproclaimtheweekofAugust5-11,2018,tobe¶FarmersMarkçtWeekintheCityofRenton,andIurgeallcitizenstojoinmeinrecognizingthemanybenefitsofourlocalFarmersMarket.InwitnesswfierecfIhavehereuntosetmyhandandcausedthesealoftheCityofRentontobeaffixedthis6thdayofAugust,2018.DenisLaw,MayorCityofRenton,WashingtonProctamationRentonCityHaIl,7thFloor1055SouthGradyWay,Renton,WA98057.rentonwa.govAGENDA ITEM #3. a) July 16, 2018 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES  MINUTES  City Council Regular Meeting  7:00 PM ‐ Monday, July 16, 2018  Council Chambers, 7th Floor, City Hall – 1055 S. Grady Way    CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE     Mayor Law called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order at 7:00 PM and led the  Pledge of Allegiance.    ROLL CALL    Councilmembers Present:  Ed Prince, Council President  Ryan McIrvin  Ruth Pérez  Armondo Pavone  Don Persson  Carol Ann Witschi  Councilmembers Absent:  Randy Corman                     MOVED BY PRINCE, SECONDED BY WITSCHI, COUNCIL EXCUSE ABSENT  COUNCILMEMBER RANDY CORMAN. CARRIED.    ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF PRESENT    Denis Law, Mayor  Robert Harrison, Chief Administrative Officer  Cheryl Beyer, Senior Assistant City Attorney   Megan Gregor, Deputy City Clerk  Cliff Long, Economic Development Director   Gregg Zimmerman, Public Works Administrator  Commander Charles Karlewicz, Police Department      ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT    Chief Administrative Officer Robert Harrison reviewed a written administrative report  summarizing the City’s recent progress towards goals and work programs adopted as part of  its business plan for 2018 and beyond. Items noted were:   The state’s Office of Financial Management has released official population totals.  Renton’s population is now 104,100, an increase of 1,400 from 2017. Renton ranks as  the state’s eighth largest city and the fourth largest city in King County.     AGENDA ITEM #7. a) July 16, 2018 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES  CONSENT AGENDA  Items listed on the Consent Agenda were adopted with one motion, following the listing.   a) Approval of Council Meeting minutes of July 9, 2018. Council Concur.   b) AB ‐ 2183 City Clerk reported the official population of the City of Renton as of 4/1/2018 to be  104,100, ranking eighth in the state by population size, as calculated by the State of  Washington Office of Financial Management. None; Information Only.   c) AB ‐ 2182 Community & Economic Development Department recommended approval of the  2018 Lodging Tax Fund allocation of $50,000 for the City of Maple Valley Ironman Triathlon  Bid, and requested authorization to execute the contract with the City of Maple Valley in the  amount of $50,000 for this proposed marketing initiative. Council Concur.    MOVED BY PRINCE, SECONDED BY PAVONE, COUNCIL CONCUR TO APPROVE THE  CONSENT AGENDA, AS PRESENTED. CARRIED.    UNFINISHED BUSINESS   a) Finance Committee Chair Persson presented a report concurring in the staff recommendation to  authorize the reclassification of the existing Lead Water Utility Pump Station Mechanic position  (Pay Grade a18, Step E) to a newly created Lead Electrical/Control Systems Technician position  (Pay Grade a25, Step E) with the estimated fiscal impact of up to $7,372 in 2018.  The fiscal  impact will be to the Water Utility enterprise fund and will not have any impact on the general  fund.  The Water Maintenance Section has sufficient funding in its 2018 budget to absorb the  increase in salary and will include a budget adjustment for the increase as part of the next  quarterly budget adjustment ordinance. The Committee further recommended that the Lead  Water Utility Pump Station Mechanic job classification be eliminated.     MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY PÉREZ, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE  COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED.   b) Finance Committee Chair Persson presented a report concurring in the staff recommendation to  hire the Capital Project Coordinator – Park Planning at Pay Grade a28, Step E.  The position is  currently budgeted at Pay Grade a28, Step C. The position has been advertised five times within  the last year, with over 20 applicants being interviewed during the recruitment processes. One  candidate met all of the qualifications of the position and has extensive municipal experience in  parks, recreation, natural areas, and trails planning, acquisition, community engagement and  grant writing. There will be no fiscal impact in 2018.  The seven month vacancy in salary savings,  in the amount of $65,395, will be applied to the Step increase at a cost of $4,801.     MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY PÉREZ, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE  COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED.   c) Finance Committee Chair Persson presented a report concurring in the staff recommendation to  approve a 50‐percent waiver of the eligible development and mitigation fees as provided in  Renton Municipal Code (RMC) 4‐1‐210C4 for the Sunset Mixed Use development. This project  includes 35 market rate apartment units and 5,000 square feet of office/retail space located at  1409 Monroe Ave NE in the Sunset Area. The subject property is 0.52 acres and located within  the Center Village (CV) zoning designation. The estimated total fees requested to be waived for  the Sunset Mixed‐Use development project are $193,249.    MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY PÉREZ, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE  COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED.   AGENDA ITEM #7. a) July 16, 2018 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES  d) Finance Committee Chair Persson presented a report concurring in the staff recommendation to  approve the authorization by the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the United Way of King County  Grantee Agency Funding Contract from June 1, 2018 to August 31, 2018 from United Way of King  County, and allocate the $8,000 grant award to support the 2018 Summer Meals Program in King  County.     MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY PÉREZ, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE  COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED.   e) Finance Committee Chair Persson presented a report concurring in the staff recommendation to  award the construction contract for the Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park Structural Repairs  project, as advertised through the Daily Journal of Commerce, to Quigg Brothers, Inc., in the  amount of $2,376,000.00 to complete the project. The Committee further recommended that  the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute the contract.     MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY PÉREZ, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE  COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED.    LEGISLATION   Resolution(s):   a) Resolution No. 4348: A resolution was read adopting the amended 2017/2018 City of Renton  Fee Schedule.     MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY WITSCHI, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION  AS READ. CARRIED.   Ordinance for second and final reading:   b) Ordinance No. 5885:  An ordinance was read amending the City of Renton Fiscal Years  2017/2018 Biennial Budget as adopted by Ordinance No. 5824 and thereafter amended by  Ordinance Nos. 5835, 5850, 5864 and 5880 in the amount of $969,621.     MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY PAVONE, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE  AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED.    NEW BUSINESS   Please see the attached Council Committee Meeting Calendar.    ADJOURNMENT    MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY PRINCE, COUNCIL ADJOURN. CARRIED.   TIME: 7:12P.M.    Jason A. Seth, CMC, City Clerk  Megan Gregor,CMC, Recorder  Monday, July 16, 2018  AGENDA ITEM #7. a) Council Committee Meeting Calendar July 16, 2018 July 23, 2018 Monday NO MEETINGS Council Holiday July 26, 2018 Thursday CANCELLED Utilities Committee, Chair Witschi CANCELLED Planning & Development Committee, Chair McIrvin July 30, 2018 Monday NO MEETINGS Fifth Monday August 6, 2018 Monday CANCELLED Transportation Committee, Chair Corman CANCELLED Community Services Committee, Chair Pérez 5:00 PM Committee of the Whole, Chair Prince – Conferencing Center 1. CAC Polling Report 2. Budget Workshop/CIP Prioritization AGENDA ITEM #7. a) AB - 2192 City Council Regular Meeting - 06 Aug 2018 SUBJECT/TITLE:Appeal of Hearing Examiner's Final Decision dated 7/15/2018 regarding the Wilson Park 1 Preliminary Plat. (File No. LUA-09-140) RECOMMENDED ACTION:Refer to Planning & Development Committee DEPARTMENT:City Clerk STAFF CONTACT:Jason Seth, City Clerk EXT.:6502 FISCAL IMPACT SUMMARY: n/a SUMMARY OF ACTION: Appeal of the Hearing Examiner’s Final Decision (dated July 15, 2018) on the Wilson Park 1 Preliminary Plat (File No. LUA-09-140) was filed on July 25, 2018 by Robert & Doravin Wilson, accompanied by the required $500.00 appeal fee. Any additional documents filed in response to this appeal will be forwarded to the Planning & Development Committee and to all Parties of Record. EXHIBITS: A. City Clerk’s letter (7/30/2018) B. Appeal – Robert & Doravin Wilson (7/25/2018) C. HEX’s Final Decision upon Reconsideration (7/15/2018) D. City’s Reply in Support of its limited Motion for Reconsideration (7/11/2018) E. Wilson’s Response to City’s Limited Motion for Reconsideration (7/9/2018) F. HEX’s Olbrechts’ email with timelines (7/2/2018) G. City’s Limited Request for Reconsideration (07/02/2018) H. HEX’s Olbrechts’ Final Decision (06/27/2018) I. Wilson’s Request for Extension of Wilson Park 1 (06/07/2018) J. HEX’s Olbrechts’ email re: Request for Extension (05/31/2018) K. HEX’s Olbrechts’ email re: Request for Extension (05/22/2018) L. City’s Request for Denial (05/22/2018) M. Wilson’s Request for Additional Time (05/03/2018) N. HEX’s Kaufman’s Decision (04/01/2010) O. Staff Report to HEX (03/16/2010) P. ERC Report (02/22/2010) Q. DNS Mitigation Measures (02/22/2010) STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Take action on the Wilson Park 1 Preliminary Plat (File No. LUA-09-140) appeal. AGENDA ITEM #7. b) Denis Law Mayor IR July 30, 2018 City Clerk-Jason A.Seth,CMC APPEAL FILED BY: Robert & Doravin Wilson RE: Appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision dated July 15, 2018, regarding Wilson Park 1 Preliminary Plat. (File No. LUA-09-140 PP, ECF) To Parties of Record: Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Renton City Code of Ordinances, written appeal of the Hearing Examiner's decision on the Wilson Park 1 Preliminary Plat has been filed with the City Clerk. In accordance with Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110F, within five days of receipt of the notice of appeal, or after all appeal periods with the Hearing Examiner have expired, the City Clerk shall notify all parties of record of the receipt of the appeal. Other parties of record may submit letters limited to support of their positions regarding the appeal within ten (10) days of the date of mailing of this notification. The deadline for submission of additional letters is by 5:00 p.m., Thursday, August 9, 2018. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the written appeal and other pertinent documents will be referred to the City Council's Planning and Development Committee. You will be notified by Julia Medzegian, Council Liaison (425-430-6501), once the hearing date has been set. Any recommendation regarding this appeal made by the Planning and Development Committee will be presented for consideration by the full Council at a subsequent Council meeting. Copy of the appeal and the Renton Municipal Code regarding appeal of Hearing Examiner decisions or recommendations is attached. Please note that the City Council will be considering the merits of the appeal based upon the written record previously established. Unless a showing can be made that additional evidence could not reasonably have been available at the prior hearing held by the Hearing Examiner, no further evidence or testimony on this matter will be accepted by the City Council. 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98057 • (425)430-6510/Fax (425)430-6516 • rentonwa.gov AGENDA ITEM #7. b) For additional information or assistance, please call Jason Seth, City Clerk, at 425-430-6510. Sincerely, Jason A. S th, CMC City Clerk Please note that if you signed up to be a Party of Record for this matter you are receiving a copy of this letter as a courtesy. Attachments cc: Hearing Examiner Chip Vincent, CED Administrator Jennifer Henning, Planning Director Vanessa Dolbee, Current Planning Manager Brianne Bannwarth, Development Engineering Manager Kyle Wunderlin, Planning Technician Judith Subia,Administrative Assistant Craig Burnell, Building Official Leslie Clark, Assistant City Attorney Ed Prince, City Councilmember Ryan Mclrvin, P& D Committee Chair Julia Medzegian, City Council Liaison Robert& Doravin Wilson, Appellants Parties of Record (10) AGENDA ITEM #7. b) 7/30/2018 Print Preview 4-8-110 APPEALS: A. SCOPE AND PURPOSE: This Section provides the basic procedures for processing appeals to the Hearing Examiner and City Council of land use and development-related decisions. Specific requirements are based upon the type/level of appeal and the appeal authority. (Ord. 5154, 9-26-2005; Ord. 5157, 9-26- 2005; Ord. 5450, 3-2-2009; Ord. 5676, 12-3-2012) B. REVIEW AUTHORITY: RMC 4-8-080G, Land Use Permit Procedures, lists the development permits reviewed by the City and the review authority responsible for open record appeals, closed record appeals and judicial appeals. RMC 4-9-070R, Environmental Review Procedures, Appeals, lists additional actions subject to appeal to the Hearing Examiner. (Ord. 4587, 3-18-1996; Amd. Ord. 4660, 3- 17-1997; Ord. 4963, 5-13-2002) C. GENERAL INFORMATION APPLICABLE TO APPEALS: The following applies to appeals to the Hearing Examiner and City Council unless otherwise provided elsewhere in the RMC or by state law: 1. Standing: Only the applicant, City or a person who has been made a party of record prior to the issuance of a decision may appeal the decision. In order to appeal, the person shall be aggrieved or affected by the decision pursuant to RCW 36.70C.060. 2. Time to File: Except for final EIS decisions, all appeal periods shall be fourteen (14) calendar days, which shall begin either three (3) calendar days after the date of mailing of the decision to the parties of record via U.S. Postal mail by the City Clerk, or the date the decision is electronically transmitted, posted or emailed to the appellant and parties of record by the City Clerk, if such electronic transmittal method has been previously approved or agreed to by the parties. The appeal period for a final EIS shall be twenty (20) calendar days from the publication of the final decision. (Ord. 5676, 12-3-2012) 3. Required Form for and Content of Appeals: Any appeal shall be filed in writing with the City Clerk. The written notice of appeal shall fully, clearly and thoroughly specify the substantial error(s) in fact or law which exist in the record of the proceedings from which the appellant seeks relief. If the appeal is unclear and does not sufficiently explain the basis for the appeal, an order requiring the appellant amend the appeal within ten (10) calendar days of the date of the order may be issued. If the appeal is not satisfactorily amended within the time allowed, it shall be dismissed. (Ord. 4353, 6-1-1992) 4. Filing of Appeal and Fee: The notice of appeal shall be accompanied by a fee in accordance with the City of Renton fee schedule. (Ord. 3658, 9-13-1982; Ord. 5660, 5-14-2012; Ord. 5688, 5-13-2013) http://www.codepublishing.com/wA/Renton/cgi/menuCompile.pl 1/6 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) 7/30/2018 Print Preview 5. Facsimile Filings: Whenever any application or filing is required under this Chapter, it may be made by facsimile. Any facsimile filing received at the City after five o'clock (5:00) p.m. on any business day will be deemed to have been received on the following business day. Any facsimile filing received after five o'clock (5:00) p.m. on the last date for filing will be considered an untimely filing. Any party desiring to make a facsimile filing after four o'clock (4:00) p.m. on the last day for the filing must call the City Clerk's office and indicate that the filing is being made by facsimile and the number to which the facsimile copy is being sent. The filing party must ensure that the facsimile filing is transmitted in adequate time so that it will be completely received by the City before five o'clock (5:00) p.m. in all instances in which filing fees are to accompany the filing of an application, those filing fees must be received by the City before the end of the business day on the last day of the filing period or the filing will be considered incomplete and will be rejected. (Ord. 4353, 6-1-1992) 6. Motions: The Hearing Examiner may dismiss an appeal to the Hearing Examiner, without hearing, when it is determined by the Hearing Examiner to be untimely, without merit on its face, incomplete, or frivolous. Any application to the Hearing Examiner for an order shall be by motion which, unless made during a hearing, shall be in writing, stating the reasons for the request and setting forth the relief or order sought. Written motions shall be received at least five (5) business days in advance of the hearing. 7. Parties: The parties in appeal hearings shall be the City, the applicant, and the appellant(s), if different from the applicant or the City. No other persons shall be allowed to testify unless serving as an expert witness for one of the parties. 8. Notice of Appeal Filed and Public Hearing: If an appeal is filed with the City Clerk, the City Clerk shall notify all parties of record to the decision subject to the appeal. Notice shall be sent within five (5) calendar days via U.S. Postal mail by the City Clerk, or on the date the application of appeal is received if electronic transmittal (email) had been previously approved or agreed to by the parties, and at least ten (10) days prior to the public hearing. A hearing for the appeal shall be set within twenty one (21) days after acceptance of a complete application for appeal. 9. Restrictions on Subsequent Actions: Any later request to interpret, explain, modify, or retract the decision shall not be deemed to be a new administrative determination creating a new appeal period for any new third party to the permit. (Ord. 4168, 8-8-1988) 10. Limit on Number of Appeals: Pursuant to RCW 36.70B.050 and 43.21C.075, the City has consolidated the permit process to allow for only one open record appeal of all permit decisions associated with a single development application. There shall be no more than one appeal on a procedural determination or environmental determination such as the adequacy of a determination of significance, nonsignificance, or of a final environmental impact statement. Any appeal of the action of the Hearing Examiner in the case of appeals from environmental determinations shall be joined with an appeal of the substantive determination. (Ord. 3891, 2- 25-1985; Ord. 4587, 3-18-1996; Ord. 4660, 3-17-1997; Ord. 5608, 6-6-2011) http://www.codepublishing.com/WA/Renton/cgi/menuCompile.pl 2/6 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) 7/30/2018 Print Preview 11. Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies: No person may seek judicial review of any decision of the City unless that person first exhausts the administrative remedies provided by the City. D. (Repealed by Ord. 5853, 8-7-17) E. APPEALS TO HEARING EXAMINER: 1. Format of the Appeal Hearing: The appeal hearing will be of an informal nature, but organized so that testimony and other evidence can be presented efficiently. An appeal hearing shall include at least the following: a.An introductory outline of the procedure by the Hearing Examiner. b. Presentation by the appellant, including any witnesses. c. Cross-examination, if any, of appellant and appellant's witnesses. d. Presentation by City staff, summarizing the staff analysis and including any witnesses for the City. e. Cross-examination, if any, of City staff and staff's witnesses. f. Presentation by the project applicant, if different from appellant, including any witnesses. g. Cross-examination of any of the project applicant and applicant's witnesses. h. Rebuttal testimony and closing by City staff. i. Rebuttal testimony and closing by applicant, if different from appellant. j. Rebuttal testimony and closing by appellant. 2. Prehearing Conference: The Hearing Examiner may schedule and hold a prehearing conference when it appears that the orderly and efficient conduct of the hearing will be served, or that settlement of the appeal through such a conference is likely. A prehearing conference may, among other things, consider: a. Simplification of the issues. b. The existence of undisputed facts to which the parties are willing to stipulate. c. The identification of witnesses and documentary or other evidence to be presented at hearing. d.Any reasonable needs any party may have for discovering the details of the case the other party intends to present. e. The imposition of reasonable time limits. http://www.codepublishing.com/WA/Renton/cgi/menuCompile.pl 3/6 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) 7/30/2018 Print Preview Based upon the discussions and agreements at such a conference, the Hearing Examiner may enter a prehearing order, which shall govern subsequent proceedings. If the case is settled at such a conference, the Hearing Examiner shall enter an order reciting the terms of the settlement and dismissing the appeal. 3. Content of the Record: The record of an appeal hearing conducted by the Hearing Examiner shall include at least the following: a. The notice of appeal and any amendments. b. The staff analysis responding to the appeal and all accompanying documents, including the papers that comprise the record of the decision subject to appeal. c.Additional documentary or physical evidence received and considered, including all exhibits filed. d. The Hearing Examiner's decision. e. Electronic recordings of the proceedings and/or an accurate written transcription thereof. 4. Hearing Examiner Decision: a. Substantial Weight: The procedural determination by the Environmental Review Committee or City staff shall carry substantial weight in any appeal proceeding. The Hearing Examiner shall give substantial weight to any discretionary decision of the City rendered pursuant to this Chapter/Title. b. Hearing Examiner Decision Options and Decision Criteria: The Hearing Examiner may affirm the decision or remand the case for further proceedings, or it may reverse the decision if the substantial rights of the applicant may have been prejudiced because the decision is: i. In violation of constitutional provisions; or ii. In excess of the authority or jurisdiction of the agency; or iii. Made upon unlawful procedure; or iv.Affected by other error of law; or v. Clearly erroneous in view of the entire record as submitted; or vi.Arbitrary or capricious. c. Time for Hearing Examiner's Decision: Each final decision of a Hearing Examiner, unless a longer period is mutually agreed to in writing by the applicant and the Hearing Examiner, shall be rendered within ten (10) business days following conclusion of all testimony and hearings. http://www.codepublishing.com/WA/Renton/cgi/menuCompile.pl 4/6 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) 7/30/2018 Print Preview d. Collateral Estoppel (Issue Preclusion): The Hearing Examiner may deny a party's request to relitigate one or more issues or determinative facts decided or ruled upon in a previous litigation if the party against whom the collateral estoppel doctrine is to be applied had a full and fair opportunity to litigate the issue in the prior proceeding. The party requesting application of the collateral estoppel doctrine must establish by a preponderance of the evidence that (1)the issue decided in the earlier proceeding was identical to the issue presented in the later proceeding; (2)the earlier proceeding ended in a judgment on the merits; (3) the party against whom collateral estoppel is asserted was a party to, or in privity with a party to, the earlier proceeding; and (4) application of collateral estoppel does not work an injustice on the party against whom it is applied. The Hearing Examiner may apply collateral estoppel, sua sponte. e. Res Judicata (Claim Preclusion): The Hearing Examiner may apply a prior ruling or summarily decide an action or appeal if the current, pending or proposed action or appeal is substantially identical to a prior action or appeal in four(4) respects: (1)the same persons and parties or a person or party in privity with the prior person or party; (2) causes of action that substantially involve the same rights or interest, the same evidence, an infringement of substantially the same rights or interests, or the two (2) actions or appeals arise out of substantially the same facts; (3) subject matter is identical or substantially the same; and (4) at least one or more of the parties are bound by the prior judgment or ruling. The party requesting application of the res judicata doctrine does not have to prove each factor, but must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that application of res judicata is appropriate. The Hearing Examiner may apply res judicata, sua sponte. f. Full and Fair Opportunity: Failure to seek or obtain evidence or information that existed at the time of the prior proceeding does not establish that a party did not have a full or fair opportunity to litigate an issue or change the subject matter of an action or appeal. (Ord. 3454, 7-28-1980; Ord. 3891, 2-25-1985; Ord. 3992, 5-19-1986; Ord. 4168, 8-8-1988; Ord. 4346, 3-9-1992; Ord. 4351, 5-4-1992; Ord. 4401, 5-3-1993; Ord. 4521, 6-5-1995; Ord. 4551, 9-18-1995; Amd. Ord. 4827, 1-24-2000; Ord. 4899, 3-19-2001; Ord. 5153, 9-26- 2005; Ord. 5558, 10-25-2010; Ord. 5675, 12-3-2012; Ord. 5706, 3-24-2014) F. APPEALS TO CITY COUNCIL: 1. Standing and Parties to the Appeal: See subsection C of this Section. 2. Time to File: See subsection C of this Section. 3. Notice of Appeal: See subsection C of this Section. 4. Council Review Procedures: No public hearing shall be held by the City Council. No new or additional evidence or testimony shall be accepted by the City Council. The cost of transcription of the hearing record shall be borne by the applicant. If a transcript is made, the applicant is required to provide a copy to the City Clerk and the Renton City Attorney at no cost. It shall be presumed that the record before the City Council is identical to the hearing record before the Hearing Examiner. (Ord. 5675, 12-3-2012) http://www.codepublishing.com/WA/Renton/cgi/menuCompile.pl 5/6 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) 7/30/2018 Print Preview 5. Burden: The burden of proof shall rest with the appellant. 6. Council Evaluation Criteria: The consideration by the City Council shall be based solely upon the record, the Hearing Examiner's report, the notice of appeal and additional arguments based on the record by parties. 7. Findings and Conclusions Required: If, upon appeal of a decision of the Hearing Examiner and after examination of the record, the Council determines that a substantial error in fact or law exists in the record, it may modify or reverse the decision of the Hearing Examiner accordingly. Ord. 5675, 12-3-2012) 8. Decision Documentation: The decision of the City Council shall be in writing and shall specify any modified or amended findings and conclusions other than those set forth in the report of the Hearing Examiner. Each material finding shall be supported by substantial evidence in the record. 9. Council Action Final: The action of the Council approving, modifying or rejecting a decision of the Hearing Examiner shall be final and conclusive, unless timely appealed. (Ord. 3658, 9-13- 1982; Ord. 4389, 1-25-1993; Ord. 4660, 3-17-1997; Ord. 5558, 10-25-2010; Ord. 5853, 8-7-17) G. RESERVED H. (Repealed by Ord. 5853, 8-7-17) I. (Repealed by Ord. 5853, 8-7-17) J. (Repealed by Ord. 5853, 8-7-17) http://www.codepublishing.com/WA/Renton/cgi/menuCompile.pl 6/6 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) CITY OF RENTON July 24, 2018 JUL 2 4 2018 r~ RECEIVED t City of Renton 16 CITY CLERK'S OFFICE City Clerk 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 Appeal of Hearing Examiner Decision to City Council Pursuant to City of Renton Code 4.8.110(F) Dear Members of the Renton City Council: Thank you for this opportunity to submit an appeal of the Hearing Examiner's decision dated June 27, 2018, denying our request for an extension of the August 16, 2018 preliminary plat approval expiration date for the Wilson Park 1 Preliminary Plat, LUA 09-140 ("Wilson Park 1"). As explained below, our appeal is premised upon undisputed"unusual circumstances" warranting an extension pursuant to City of Renton Code ("RMC") 4-7-080(L)(2). Standing and Procedural Background We are Robert and Doravin Wilson, owners of Wilson Park 1 as well as the related Wilson Park 2 Preliminary Plat, LUA 12-013 ("Wilson Park 2"). We built a home, raised a family, and lived on Wilson Park 1 from 1977 to 2005 and are now retired. We are the applicants for the Wilson Park 1 preliminary plat approval, and on May 3, 2018, we applied to the Hearing Examiner for an 11-month extension of the Wilson Park 1 approval, which is set to expire on August 16, 2018. We agreed to proceed without a hearing and provided written submissions to the Examiner. On June 27, 2018, the Examiner issued a decision denying our request for an extension but granting a limited three-month extension, extending the plat approval to November 16, 2018. On July 2, 2018, the City filed a Motion for Reconsideration, asking the Examiner to revoke the limited extension. On July 15, 2018, the Examiner granted the City's motion, revoked the limited extension, and reinstated the plat expiration date to August 16, 2018. Factual Background Wilson Park l's approval was set to expire on August 16, 2018. RMC 4-7-080(L)(2) provides that the Examiner may grant an extension of a preliminary plat approval "if the applicant can show need caused by unusual circumstances or situations which make it unduly burdensome to file the final plat . . . ." In our request to the Examiner, we requested an 11-month extension of Wilson Park l's approval, extending the approval from August 16, 2018 to July 5, 2019. The related Wilson Park 2 approval expires on July 5, 2019. Thus, if granted, our request would synch the validity of the two interrelated plats. The following timeline explains the unusual circumstances surrounding Wilson Park 1 and 2: 1 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) On August 2010, the Hearing Examiner approved Wilson Park 1. This preliminary plat approval was based upon obtaining an access and utility easement across adjacent property.' On October 2010, the adjacent property, across which we had our access and utility easement, was foreclosed and transferred by Trustee's Deed. This foreclosure jeopardized Wilson Park l's access and utility easement rights, and thus triggered the need to negotiate acquiring the adjacent property from the bank. On March 2011, we purchased the adjacent property from the bank. This acquisition triggered both the need and the opportunity to re-evaluate plat design to develop both parcels with common access, utility, and stormwater infrastructure and grading to maximize the ability to balance cuts and fills on the combined property. On July 2012, the Hearing Examiner approved Wilson Park 2 (the preliminary plat for the adjacent property we had acquired from the bank). On June 2014, the City of Renton signed and stamped our final engineering drawings for Wilson Park 1 and 2 combined as one overall project. On December 2014, the Soos Creek Water District approved and signed the final design drawings for the overall 22-lot development. On July 26, 2015, the City of Renton granted our request for a one-year extension for Wilson Park 1, extending the plat approval to August 16, 2018. Under RMC 4-7- 080(L)(1), the City may grant an extension if the applicant demonstrates good faith effort to obtain final plat approval. In our request to the Examiner, we included Declarations from Steve A. Beck and Darrell Offe, two professionals who have extensive experience working on plats and who worked on Wilson Park 1 and 2. Both professionals opined that this project was unusually difficult and burdensome compared to other projects in their experience, and Wilson Park l's timeline exceeded the average timeline for obtaining approvals for a project of this type and scale. Mr. Offe, our engineer for Wilson Park 1 and 2, explained the difficulties and delays that arose when designing, engineering, and obtaining approvals for Wilson Park 1 and 2. As Mr. Offe explained, after we had obtained the Wilson Park 1 approval, the foreclosure and need to coordinate development between Wilson Park 1 and 2 consumed a considerable portion--4.5 years—of Wilson Park l's approval period. For 4.5 years, we were unable to market or pursue final plat approval for Wilson Park 1. Mr. Beck, our broker and advisor, testified that we aggressively marketed the property, continually lowered the price to below market price and had at least six deals. Nevertheless, Supporting documents and exhibits such as the Easement were attached to our May 3,2018 request to the Examiner,which is attached as Attachment A. 2 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) because the market was still recovering at the time, we were unable to close any deals. Potential buyers have informed Mr. Beck that they would be interested only if Wilson Park 1 and 2 are sold together, because the two sites are linked and interrelated. As shown above, we have invested significant good faith effort, money, and time into Wilson Park 1 and 2. If Wilson Park l's approval expires, we will lose our investment in both. However, potential buyers have informed Mr. Beck that if Wilson Park l's approval were extended to July 2019 to coincide with Wilson Park 2's approval, the extension would afford sufficient time to complete construction of improvements and obtain final plat approval for both preliminary plats. Appeal Arguments In his decision,the Hearing Examiner found that the foreclosure and coordinated development issues with Wilson Park 2 constituted"good unusual circumstances."However, the Examiner ultimately denied our request because the Examiner found that most of the development issues had been resolved by December 2014 (when Soos Creek Water District approved final design), with 3.5 years of the approval period remaining. The Examiner also found that our difficulties marketing the property were not sufficient justification for further extension. We believe that our undisputed facts and testimony do show sufficient justification for a brief, 11-month extension, and therefore the Examiner's denial of our request was an error. First, the Examiner expressly found that we had shown unusual circumstances and delays for at least the first 4.5 years of Wilson Park l's approval period, during which we could not market or pursue final approval. Although 3.5 years remained, 3.5 years is considerably less than the standard five-year validity period for preliminary plats.2 In effect, our unusual circumstances significantly shortened Wilson Park 1's validity period, and the Examiner erred by not considering this shortened period as a burden justifying extension. Second,the Examiner erred by not considering the market and economic conditions as potentially relevant justification. On several occasions during and after the recent recession, the Legislature considered the economic downturn as justification for statutorily extending the plat approval period.3 Although Wilson Park 1 received an additional two years through the Legislature's extension, the time spent incorporating Wilson Park 2 consumed more than twice that period, depriving us of the benefit of the Legislature's extension. Moreover, as Mr. Beck attested,the market was still recovering from the recession after we obtained the approvals for Wilson Park 2. The slow market, compounded with our shortened approval period, created an additional burden justifying extension. Further, while we did have the option of developing the property ourselves, as the Examiner pointed out, we also had legitimate reasons to believe that we would be able to obtain a buyer before the expiration date. As Mr. Beck stated, we lowered the price until it reached below market, and we had a number of interested buyers. Additionally, my wife and I are now retired, are not commercial developers, and would frankly find it difficult to develop the property ourselves. The number of deals and interested buyers gave us reason to expect we could secure a buyer and to hold off on doing the construction ourselves. 2 See RMC 4-7-080(L)(1)(providing a five-year validity period for preliminary plats). 3 2010 c 79 § 1; Washington Final Bill Report,2013 Reg. Sess. H.B. 1074. 3 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) We understand that since Wilson Park 1 and 2's approval, the City has revised its development regulations on retaining walls and other matters, and the Examiner considered the revised regulations as indication of"public detriment" in granting the extension. Because Wilson Park 1 and 2 vested to the prior regulations, we are not familiar with the revised regulations. However, no City employee has ever raised concerns about the safety or soundness of Wilson Park 1 or 2's design. In fact,the Examiner found that the revised regulations related to "community aesthetics,"not to safety or public health.4 Therefore, we do not believe that Wilson Park 1 and 2, which have already received the necessary approvals from the Examiner and the City, causes any public detriment or impact. In fact, as Mr. Beck also stated, we believe the project will add valuable housing inventory to the City and will help meet the current high demand for single- family homes. Finally, the tone and the arguments in the City's filings are striking and indicative of the City's arbitrary and capricious opposition to our project. For example, the Examiner's original decision had granted only a limited three-month extension, recognizing that the pendency of our extension request created delay and uncertainties surrounding the plat's expiration date. The City asked the Examiner to revoke that limited extension, created more delay and uncertainties, and ultimately left us with only one month of our plat approval period remaining. In its motion to revoke the limited extension,the City argued that the extension should be revoked to deprive us of the opportunity to construct improvements and obtain final plat approval. Notwithstanding that Wilson Park 1 is valid, approved, and vested, the City's apparent position is that the project should be stopped, and we should not obtain final approval. Conclusion We respectfully request that the City Council re-examine the record in light of our arguments above, and grant our request to extend the Wilson Park 1 approval to July 5, 2019, synching the expiration dates of Wilson Park 1 and 2. This request represents a brief, 11-month extension of the current expiration date (August 16, 2018), and if granted, will allow us sufficient time to obtain final plat approval. Please let us know if you require any additional information to support our request. Thank you, Robert and Doravin Wilson 72ó / )4;g-vc-v - Exhibits from the record (attached for reference): Attachment A: Wilsons' Request for Additional Extension Pursuant to Renton Municipal Code 4-7-080; Attachments A—F, filed May 3, 2018 Attachment B: City's Request for Denial of May 3, 2018 Request, filed May 22, 2018 J Attachment H at p. 1. 4 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) Attachment C: Wilsons' Reply in Support of Request for Additional Extension; Declaration of Steven A. Beck; Declaration of Darrell Offe, filed June 7, 2018 Attachment D: Hearing Examiner's Final Decision, filed June 27, 2018 Attachment E: City's Limited Motion for Reconsideration, filed July 2, 2018 Attachment F: Wilsons' Response to City's Limited Motion for Reconsideration, filed July 9, 2018 Attachment G: City's Reply in Support of Its Limited Motion for Reconsideration, filed July 11, 2018 Attachment H: Hearing Examiner's Final Decision upon Reconsideration, filed July 15, 2018 5 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) A Tta4 Pkep-} Robert and Doravin Wilson (owners) 21703 60th St. E Lake Tapps, WA 98391 May 3, 2018 Mr. Phil Olbrechts Renton Hearing Examiner 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 Ref: (1) Request for Additional Extension Pursuant to Renton Municipal Code 4-7-080 2) Wilson Park 1 Preliminary Plat LUA 09-140, PP, 12 lots 3) Wilson Park 2 Preliminary Plat LUA 12-013, PP, PUD, 10 lots Dear Sir: We are Robert and Doravin Wilson, owners of the referenced properties. We bought the property of Ref 2, built a home and lived there from 1977 to 2005, raised a family, and now are retired. We are requesting an 11 month extension to the period of validity for Wilson Park 1, from the current date of August 16, 2018 to July 5, 2019 per provisions of the Renton City Code 4-7-080, Paragraph L.2 "Additional Extensions." July 5, 2019 is the current ending date for the period of validity for Wilson Park 2, Ref 3. This extension would allow both projects, referenced above, to be completed and recorded concurrently as one total project, which has been the intent since final engineering approval by the City of Renton in the 2014 time period as one plat of 22 lots. The final engineering design is based on combined development of both plats. This letter explains the unusual circumstances surrounding the two separate preliminary plat applications and the need to combine the two preliminary plats into a single development proposal, thus satisfying the code requirements for an additional extension. The following timeline details the progress of the referenced project: 1 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) Artac-I Exp- A- 1.1. August , 2010— Hearing Examiner approval of Wilson Park 1 Preliminary Plat, City File No. LUA 09-140. This preliminary plat approval was based upon an access and utility easement across adjacent property. A copy of this easement is attached to this letter as Attachment A. 2. October, 2010—Trustee's deed transferring the adjacent property across which we had our access and utility easement pursuant to bank foreclosure. This foreclosure jeopardized access and utility easement rights and thus triggered the need to negotiate acquisition of the adjacent property from the bank to protect access. A copy of that Trustee deed to the bank is attached to this letter as Attachment B. 3. March, 2011— We purchased adjacent property from the bank. A copy of the Bargain and Sale deed to us from the bank is attached to this letter as Attachment C. This acquisition triggered both the need and the opportunity to re-evaluate plat design to develop both parcels with common access, utility and stormwater infrastructure and grading to maximize ability to balance cuts and fills on the combined property. 4. July, 2012 — Hearing Examiner approval of Wilson Park 2 Preliminary Plat the property we acquired from the bank), City File No. LUA 12-013. 5. June, 2014— City of Renton signed and stamped our Final Engineering drawings for Wilson Park 1 and 2 combined as one overall project. A copy of the final engineering drawings is attached as Attachment D. 6. December, 2014— Soos Creek Water District approved and signed design drawings for the overall 22 lot development. Attachment E. 7. July 26, 2015 — City of Renton granted a one- year extension for Wilson Park 1 per our request. Attachment F. As this summary timeline and the attached documents demonstrate, we had to buy the Wilson Park 2 property in 2011 because a bank was foreclosing on the previous owner. We found out that our easement rights to put the road across the now Wilson Park 2 property to Wilson Park 1 would be eliminated by the foreclosure. 2 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) These circumstances delayed us in preparing final engineering for Wilson Park 1 for about a year and a half. We hired engineering to file a preliminary plat of the Wilson Park 2 property and began final engineering of the combined properties into one overall development. Combining development of the two parcels facilitated access, grading, utilities and stormwater design as an integrated project. The requested additional extension for Wilson Park 1 validity period will allow Wilson Park 1 and 2 to continue to be linked together for overall development. It has always been planned that the two properties will be constructed together, thereby allowing optimum grading of the roadway slopes and building pads without need for import or export of grading materials. A structural wall is required at the curve linking both properties, and the storm water vault serving both properties is located on Wilson Park 2. These are further illustrations the two properties are interdependent. The two properties have always been marketed together as one total package of 22 lots. Given the interrelated design, including the topographical challenges of the site, we have been unable to successfully market the plat in the original time periods for preliminary plat approval, despite dropping the selling price significantly over the past two years during a time when home and finished lot prices continue to rise dramatically. More interest is now being shown with our current land pricing plus the effect of rising home sales prices. Recent feedback from possible buyers, though, suggest that the timing of completion of the Wilson Park 1 portion of the development before the expiration date of August 16, 2018 is a real concern. We believe, with feedback from buyers, if Wilson Park 1 expiration date of Aug. 16, 2018 can be extended 11 months to July 5, 2019 coinciding with Wilson Park 2 validation, near term sale of the properties can be accomplished. This extension would allow development of both plats, as always intended. With the current lack of inventory of buildable land and new homes, the City of Renton will benefit sooner if we can make this happen. We have spent a very significant amount of time and effort and money to bring these two properties through preliminary plat approval at different times, and AGENDA ITEM #7. b) Atf ekkeaf A then combining them into one project through final engineering and approval by the City of Renton. The unexpected risk to our original access easement caused by the 2010 foreclosure presents the type of unusual and unexpected circumstances that your code specifies for our additional extension request. Obviously, we do not want to lose our investment by allowing Wilson Park 1 period of validity to expire. If Wilson Park 1 expires, Wilson Park 2 can't be built either. The two parcels are combined into one project for final engineering and construction as described above. This linkage between the two plats, one that expires in 2019 and one that expires in 2018 also creates an unusual circumstance beyond our control. We are sincerely asking you for your consideration and approval of this request for an 11 month extension of the period of validity for Wilson Park 1 preliminary plat approval from August 16, 2018 to July 5, 2019. This will synch the deadlines for these two interrelated plats. If you require any of this information to be submitted in the form of a sworn declaration, we would be happy to work with our land use attorney, Jay Derr, to prepare one. However, he indicated that the city code provision for extensions does not require a new evidentiary hearing and thus suggested that for simplicity and because time is of the essence, we submit our request directly. Please let us know if you require any additional information to support our request. Thank You, Robert and Doravin Wilson — Owners (253-208-3263) Cc: Jay P. Derr, C.E."Chip" Vincent, Jennifer T. Henning, Shane Moloney, Ed Prince, Ryan Mclrvin, Steve Beck Attachments: 6 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) ro 44473 , 2©ry (e ffev) AFTER RECORDING MAIL TO:1 ROBERT D.WILSON 20080327002018 COMMONWEALTH L EAS 45.00 720 SO. 55TH ST.N91176711 1g117 RENTON,WA 98055 KING COUNTY, WA E2338944 03/27/2008 13:08 KING COUNTY, WA TAX 51,429.00 SALE 0,000.00 PAGE001 OF 001 ROAD AND UTILITY EASEMENT ROAD AND UTILITY EASEMENT executed this 24th day of March, 20 , by and between ERIK DORMAIER, a single man, (hereinafter referred to as "Grantor"), and ROBERT D. WILSON and DORaVIN A. WILSON, husband and wife, (hereinafter referred to as Grantees"). WHEREAS; Grantor is the owner, in fee simple, of that certain real property situate in the City of Renton, King County,Washington, legally described as follows: The East 317 feet of the \Vest 1,003 feet of the South 318 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 31, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in King County, Washington; Said document(s) were filed for record EXCEPT County Road. by Commonwealth Land Title as accommodation hereinafter referred to as "Parcel A") only. It has not been examined as to proper Tax Parcel Number: 312305-9119-00 execution or as to its effect upon title. AND WHEREAS; Grantees are the owners, in fee simple, of that certain real property commonly known as 720 South 55th Street,Renton,Washington, legally described as follows: Parcel 3, King County Short Plat No. 674217, recorded under Recording No. 7603170525, in King County,Washington. hereinafter referred to as "Parcel B") Tax Parcel Number: 312305-9125-02 AND WHEREAS; the parties hereto do hereby desire to grant a non-exclusive easement for ingress, egress and utilities over, under, upon, across and through a portion of the said Parcel A,for the benefit of the said Parcel B; Road and Utility Easement-Page 1 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) To ,May 3, Le r) WITNESSETH _ NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION of the sum of Eighty Thousand and No/100 Dollars, ($80,000.00), and the mutual promises, covenants and agreements contained herein, and the mutual benefits to be derived therefrom, the parties hereto do hereby promise, covenant and agree as follows: 1. Grantor does hereby grant and convey to the owners of the said Parcel B, their heirs, executors, successors and/or assigns, a non-exclusive easement for ingress, egress and utilities over, under,upon,across and through that portion of the said Parcel A, described as follows: An easement for ingress, egress and utilities lying 25 feet on each side of the following described centerline: Beginning at the Southeast Corner of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 31, Township 23 North, Range 5 East,W.M.,in King County,Washington; Thence North along the East Line of said Section 31 to the Northeast Corner of the South 318 feet of said Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 31; Thence West along the North Line of the South 318.00 feet of the said Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 31, a distance of 497.37 feet to the Point of Beginning of this description; Thence South along a line parallel with the East Line of the East 317.00 feet of the West 1003.00 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 31 to a point on the South Line of said Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 31 and the terminus of this description, extending and shortening the side lines as to terminate at the property line; EXCEPT County Roads. hereinafter referred to as "Road and Utility Easement") 2. The parties hereto acknowledge that both Parcel A and Parcel B are being marketed for sale. In the event that both Parcel A and Parcel B are sold to or acquired by the same party or related entities of the same party, then Erik Dormaier, a single man, shall refund to Robert D. Wilson and Doravin A. Wilson, husband and wife, all consideration paid for this Road and Utility Easement. 3.The owners of the said Parcels A and B shall be equally responsible for and shall each pay 50% of the costs and expenses of the installation, maintenance, repair, replacement and/or improvement said Road and Utility Easement until such time as said Road and Utility Easement becomes a dedicated City of Renton Street; provided, the owners of Parcel B shall have no obligation for such costs and expenses until said Road and Utility Easement is being used by them and for the benefit of said Parcel B; provided further, in the event said Road and Utility Easement is used only for utility purposes, the obligation referred to herein above shall be limited to those related to the utility purposes and shall not include obligations, expenses etc., as relate to ingress and egress. The parties acknowledge their intent to make improvements to said Easement so that the City of Renton will accept said improved right of way as a city street; provided, Robert D. Road and Utility Easement-Page 2 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) To May 3 zoik //t),;) Wilson and Doravin A.Wilson shall have no personal liability for any of the aforementioned costs and expenses. 4. The owners of Parcel B shall have the right to grant utility easements over, under and across said Easement to any and all providers including, but not limited to, electrical power, natural gas, water and sewer,cable and other or related utilities etc. 5. The parties hereto shall cooperate in taking all necessary steps in dedicating or otherwise transferring said roadway to the City of Renton as a public right of way as soon as the road improvements have been completed in accordance with the requirements of the City of Renton. And as part of the development of either of the parcels described hereinabove (Parcel A and/or Parcel B), when the said Easement has been dedicated to the City of Renton as a public right of way, then this Easement, with the exception of provisions contained in Paragraph 2 above, and the right of contribution contained in Paragraph 3 above, shall immediately terminate and shall be of no force and effect. 6.Covenant Running with Lands/Attorney's Fees. This Agreement shall be a covenant punning with the Iands described herein, and shall inure to the benefit of the parties hereto, their heirs, executors, successors and/or assigns. In the event that any party to this Agreement, their heirs, executors, successors and/or assign, retains the services of an attorney to enforce any provision of this Agreement, the prevailing party in such enforcement proceedings shall be entitled to recover their reasonable attorney's fees and costs incurred therein. LN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have hereunto set their hands the date and year first above written. ERIK DORMAIER bc),A4c\-` q7' ROBERT D.WILSON DORAVIN A. WILSON Road and Utility Easement-Page 3 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) TA l, aWil__ A r0 Atay ;, 2.04Le/fe ) STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. COUNTY OF KING On this day personally appeared before me, a notary-public, Erik Dormaier,to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the within instrument and acknowledged that he signed the same as his free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes herein mentioned. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND OFFICLAL SEAL this day of March, 2008. tt+ rf' OS` 5ONc 4 'y 0:4\b01 44;W `, PrintW:< : Craig D. hielbar 0. NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at Puyallup i54'y+ r 0130 9 p: My Commission Expires: 8/30/200980- l/` t' AS` 11 STATE OF WASHINGTON .) ss. COUNTY OF KING On this day personally appeared before me, a notary public, Robert D. Wilson and Doravin A. Wilson, to me known to be the individuals described in and who executed the within instrument and acknowledged that they signed the same as their free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes herein mentioned. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL thise day of March, 2008. O krr C _ . 0TA,Q 4 •, 15 +-- • . Printer •'!•" raig D. - ielbar NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of i Washington,,residing at Puyallup r ` ++i..iiv ..••`. My Commission Expires: 8/30/2009 Road and Utility Easement-Page 4 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) 111100111111111102--°/f'L trey-) After recording return to: 20101027000645 Patrick K.McKenzie ARH 0MUNF 3TD 64.00 Marsh Mundorf Pratt Sullivan+McKenzie,P 10/27/2010 12:00 16504 9th Avenue SE, Suite 203 KING COUNTY, WA Mill Creek,WA 98012 E2464251. 10/27/2010 12:00 KING COUNTY, UA TAX 1 . SALE 0.00 PAGE-001 OF 001 Document Title:Trustee's Deed Reference No. 20061229002003 Grantor: Marsh Mundorf Pratt Sullivan+McKenzie,P.S.C.,Trustee Grantee: Prime Pacific Bank N.A. Legal Des:PTN SEC 31, TWP23 N,R 5 E Assessor Parcel No. 312305-9119-00 TRUSTEE'S DEED The Grantor, Marsh Mundorf Pratt Sullivan + McKenzie, P.S.C., as successor Trustee under that Deed of Trust, as hereinafter particularly described, in consideration of the premises and payment recited below, hereby grants and conveys, without warranty, to Prime Pacific Bank,N.A., Grantee, that real property, situated in the County of King, State of Washington, legally described as follows: THE EAST 317 FEET OF THE WEST 1,003 FEET OF THE SOUTH 318 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 31,TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH,RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY,WASHINGTON; EXCEPT COUNTY ROAD 1. This Conveyance is made pursuant to the powers, including the power of sale, conferred upon said Trustee by that certain Deed of Trust between Eric Dormaier, as Grantor, to Prime Pacific Bank.N.A.,as Beneficiary,dated December 22,2006,and recorded on December 29, 2006 under King County Recording No.20061229002003,records of King County, Washington. 2. Said Deed of Trust was executed to secure, together with other undertakings, the payment of a promissory note in the principal sum of$785,000.00 with interest thereon, according to the terms thereof, in favor of Prime Pacific Bank,N.A. and to secure any other sums of money which might become due and payable under the terms of said Deed of Trust. AGENDA ITEM #7. b) en 1 3r41. f., T& /VI? Jz 213i1 Le iteY, 3. The described Deed of Trust provides that the real property conveyed therein is not used principally for agricultural or farming purposes. 4. Default having occurred in the obligations secured and/or covenants of the Grantor as set forth in "Notice of Trustee's Sale" described below, which by the terms of the Deed of Trust made operative the power to sell, the thirty day advance "Notice of Default" was transmitted to the Grantor, or his successor in interest, and a copy of said Notice was posted or served in accordance with law. 5. Prime Pacific Bank N.A., being the holder of the indebtedness secured by said Deed of Trust, delivered to said Trustee a request directing said Trustee to sell the described property in accordance with the law and the terms of said Deed of Trust. 6.The defaults specified in the "Notice of Default" not having been cured,the Trustee, in compliance with the terms of said Deed of Trust,executed and on June 28, 2010 recorded in the office of the King County Recorder, a "Notice of Trustee's Sale" of said property under recording No. 20100628000192. 7.The Trustee, in its aforesaid "Notice of Trustee's Sale" fixed the place of sale at the main entrance, King County Administration Building, 500 Fourth Avenue, Seattle, Washington on October 15, 2010, at 10:00 o'clock a.m., and in accordance with law, caused copies of the statutory Notice of Trustee's Sale" to be transmitted by mail to all persons entitled thereto and either posted or served prior to ninety days before the sale; further, the Trustee caused a copy of said "Notice of Trustee's Sale" to be published between the thirty-fifth and twenty-eighth day before the date of sale, and once between the fourteenth and seventh day before the date of sale; and further, included with this Notice, which was transmitted or served to or upon the Grantor or their successor in interest, a "Notice of Foreclosure" in substantially the statutory form, to which copies of the Grantor's Note and Deed of Trust were attached. 8. During foreclosure, no action was pending on an obligation secured by said Deed of Trust. 9. All legal requirements and all provisions of said Deed of Trust have been complied with,as to acts to be performed and notices to be given,as provided in Chapter 61.24 RCW. 10. The defaults specified in the"Notice of Trustee's Sale"not having been cured eleven days prior to the date of Trustee's Sale and said obligation secured by said Deed of Trust remaining unpaid, on October 15, 2010 the date of sale, which was not less than 190 days from the date of default in the obligation secured, the Trustee then and there sold at public auction to said Grantee, the highest bidder therefore,the property hereinabove described. AGENDA ITEM #7. b) AA 70 ; 2v,A L el f er DATED this 18th day of October,2010. MARSH MUNDORF PRATT SULLIVAN MCKENZIE,P.S.C. c1102 By: Patrick K.McKenzie, Secretary Trustee STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH ) On this day personally appeared Patrick K. McKenzie, to me known to be the person described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument as Secretary of Marsh Mundorf Pratt Sullivan +McKenzie, P.S.C. and on oath stated that he was authorized to execute said instrument on behalf of the corporation, and acknowledged the same to be the free and voluntary act of said entity, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. GIVEN under my hand and official seal on October 18th, 2010. 0/ osp,N L. 0S e,wSISSIDlyffe444/ tiXi 1\107,4Ry t< Print name: i9 4., COPi L c Fr P ry Notary Public in and for the State of o.;OJ3\\:;- .20J3 Washington,residing at . trit c . G O My commission expires: /j—/(7_ /3 W'VASH&N C?rtrr PacSc 8a11.'Fsk K.W tnniev:s D¢ddoc AGENDA ITEM #7. b) tit a/ 3/ z„,k' se!ter) 11111111111111111111111 112011031700037Afterrecordingjreturnto: NORTHPOINT ESC D 63.00 Robert Wilson and Doravin Wilson 03/17/2011 1OF 2:04 21703 60th Si E KING COUNTY, WA Lake Tapps, WA 98391 E2482673 03/17/2011 12:02 KING COUNTY, WA TAX 4,455.00 SALE 250,000,00 PAGE-001 OF 001 Reference: 30048506-326-3G1 oiestrow+tide orderorder no. 0 p BARGAIN AND SALE DEED( p THE GRANTOR(S) Prime Pacific Bank, N.A., a National banking association for and in consideration of Two hundred fifty thousand and no/100 Dollars ($250,000.00), in hand paid, bargains, sells, and conveys to Robert Wilson and Doravin Wilson, husband and wife the following described real estate,situated in the County of King, state of Washington: THE EAST 317 FEET OF THE WEST 1,003 FEET OF THE SOUTH 318 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST,W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT COUNTY ROAD; SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING,STATE OF WASHINGTON. Abbreviated Legal: (Required if full legal not inserted above) PTN OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 31,TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M Tax Parcel Nurnber(s): 3123059119 Bargain and Sale Deed Page 1 of 2 LPB-15-05(Itr) (rev. 4/2009) AGENDA ITEM #7. b) To /+try 3 2(..,1i Le1f'c - Dated: March4. 2011 Prime Pacific Bank, N.A. . J By:cx...k O- : Its:Sc.:. t1 r State of Washington , nohorn5 ss. County of I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that [, -u K 2 Z)D is the person who.appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that (he/she) signed this instrument, on oath stated that(he/she) is authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the aft.Yt2 E of Prima Pacific Bank, N.A.to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned In the instrument. Dated: & - Of f Given under my hand and official seal the day and year last above written. a.ekkJa--) Notary Public in nd for the State of VV 1L Residing at 4 4L 3410MyAppointmentexpires: Oar" // C. M. PICKRELL NOTARY PUBUC STATE OF WASHINGTON COMMISSION EXPIRES JUNE 9,2011 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) M ffirt v mhy aNnmc w I C/C i Ds noHS xD.7 3 :M r10_ W I Jamin+rE v ufo M / N 0 .1/1A 3 Zd i? Le fet-) wx 'E uI: jr ? mag j 1.,Q i r> i,.. J om3w® ot=wpo x=w[ ce i Z Z ai Y:/ ` W 7 W: O ool- wrz 36111 Zc 3 zxt/x e e e S ,,,,)„,17, y42a Z y Zia z3Ka i_...„, KnI"W.. W Z J 4' .Z -NO 2;j Z mnWOa (Wi zrl l-0 Z 8 tl7O NgaW Oa¢O <OLa F YlC 1-W Z VI O Q m G 4y . z-.Ji' 0_000 m otn i N.J..d 2 limo ct 4J J N...:n to O N o an S ScLgLL 3 ^ L}zzzoQ aeoaoo H- otn- ° LLWLLZZZ N Q ari>OOEMMCLt''-M, r Vll t" LLwcc¢oulv,tnFOO Z ww i w, ,' ooh> QL" FW'ozw z U O N wl L. ¢L p \ JC, QWW O J o aQQ > tz - 1' 01E A eIL_, Voo8 a f..3 LL tJI z o-Nrra N mN,<,u,r .s 2. ciW n ` y,i. 3.. C01-: cowct t3% air 7 1 1..{. Z a ii 53 J I SII. Z 06 4 0 2% 'i W 14 N Z 'w Om tn rn s 1 I_, 1 i 1 Ti-ll 0 V 1 3S 311N3LV Puzo t o K x e W 0_2 Z I I WOir, e gf41o J i m fla y99hPLACESCCfl, ti 3R .i r 3 G covJ 0 5,1' it I ; r O J Cao yo 5tn I s mI S hZ OWU QO W 0 w mz¢ 5 i j CU) OU 9B/F/ OZU JO_ q'§;c i 1 LL J G co v Wa Wok L a yyO f,) V4L" cwW Lci Ce 0 u, I-- ao0 I Ist r W } Q m ' o yf41. Z Uj unos cvoa lour! az twin 1 z g-k:,. z On 1 VIII 4?_ $ia s W W D Z ' E q ; eta 00 co 1 z .66 .-6„ " ze z 0 w F LL g L z c gc !R o y ` rV " LL 0 v=im < e O Q a y `.1rsi #-a zo W J H oJ_ N 0.07v),01•9L9ZM„Zb,£L105 n i 4N; LI i` z m solo: 1 3U t'`''','- Z w v' n 1 _ '"3o Cr) w 5 2 w'`Q' e. v-hNN,,, N do zI A X I w?aI ice= \NLzcU W u.ag z 0_e 3 W.12 - L11 war w„I -- ,bS'1F£1 i$'1F£!3.BY,ac ooN_____ I I NN o A1 2 4 ooz o wooz o e 13 ,i- ,' 1.-1 [Ds Hw^' '-'4'' ce,:l.. m u NN =2 Is QrO WO' rj 0 U In al 12 w, N 1z9r OOaU WI OSU 2 U 14, NiL ry122 C QZ U n oho= U N opz o L I I z OU7x!"F w u a Y"w u ,„ a pn SO'SZ£i ;,v 3; Q Nu.,Q-w : - r 477V),OfOS9Z 3.S,Fb.GOr z nooy rz nmz (AB z nx ' mzo ? EW.naf o mo-' w d J 3 4v`"i'bs ax §,E,7,0 in3 0 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) oG e n^ - m a a do oN;stn T n r+ gzr " jwrQ N B muu aii I Z Y Jv`'Ed a w b WI6tA a m U 00WI 5.- , i,,g'0 A f s m m N01- 0 og_Agc - a 70 4 y 3evil' 1.€.-ter) Y =-I r h44 appri 3rA C.0J t h 4n R% a.- u C Q S. y mai_ J 1,Z ilII5 I n 57.0' SQ0' 50.0. 50.0' , Q 20700' 5ori3'a_zw °'I yx. W 1 4 1 15.00' -- 92.0' 4 3. m, c"3 n I 51.6' , W 63.9' 89.0' wi I i C7 76S' I N ni x ci c1 a. o os I i',.,'1o o d o I ';''a. Z 12 a -. 0 O o e\ I - @ I O 89.0' 76.5' .Icol I az 3 111 Po N 89.0' 69.5' `l I m 'o y0N \I I I W a 55.0' 55.0' I 55.0' fI 55 0' 56.3' Esi J I ' IOdsso1 1 I 1 I 94.7' myJ1' IZ1Iai-, w! G' o Q o 0o a En g 1 z o C V^ r I 1 s, 1iroi0l11sj o 3 i 1 i I I IW I iof ry swwIm 39-i.9S.0N .9L90Z C II Zi I I a. r '- G. wivl 1 ' O o al' n a3, b a, oI 4, q' d 61 ' c 4t$:.A.:.: Oa o I! s 0 0 o O 9 o O iI 0 I N o„ it, I r 0 oo: omi I h pl.': Er; 1 r I 0 20' REAR BS.9.L- I1- m5 , o < r 6C.0' 56.0' 56.0'56.0' c0 0'x 2 z 5 53— : 'eu r' 1 , CI)En"W I N i Ci a 6• oc i swi z Ztm to , rn n i W§ J6jaCzz7k32I-r j a gii m - z']" . , rF0gO r in OL!r I ' j I t 1-.;11,2, ,'-2, W'Z_. '"' "..,.p''sc" ct- am wm J o' J t -13 30Wt poi g=800008 p cz 4mnrvn w I i"( V ov J UUtJ00 0 ZW 1 \i/• uoc V f 00Rn LL0 N O AGENDA ITEM #7. b) o 1 2 8 8 8 1 21-+ a r it a a 2 i etel CC i N a 1 U o a i ' a w JO ts-Li4 1 zZ¢¢ ooa o OOI-Z 1i.`f'' 7 i="."_ F. ica<w e, m m to t/)cA O s W W, = 3 z To a 3 hr letter/ '•, m W '3: ^ cc n6/—cEr1. P., i 3 F v J LU 12 a` .' Z r 0 ccuz o 00-' 37o" sg o SY l rte. n C air-,-..;.r.1 ` A L X51..,`c 3o0 a il Q r y asW11-...•-•:'''—/_„( k I r s t r Ys Z f , - or x In 21r CO L __-- ave -4----r---. i` -._ zea ro 1_: cv F i\ i 2is sjar/ 42a c,_ NW c;::-----------4-----',i : 6am _— _ may-% 7 CI- a: e. I _ I //, !1I Z ..Rte' ra. -t,77-____",•"----,iv----FP' 11 v`_ _ jlvlt c.-aamlc 'T'_ :3- j off 1 CO 2- tz-- -f- i`,f! y \ i C0fAl7Armitflitilili_.....Tif ..7.,: elj'esia,......... ..,,,,„,...„,F- sir`i'`'` %[/r j• 7 I D o 7/g w€ 4 ice. ,.' I o,.n d c+'.• e' etJ., .. y%fl)4 1'JNIW3i,^, -3NI1 Attl3dCiid SIc I' k'_ ggI tea- i r n V J ion ae u W ul=z b'o <a W.53 Zn . tlm a; 6.66 <E z R. ? Hca IT, d7 s. Z < Lcgo i o n$xS S W C.. 03 13 rT, ZG6 zo W FV p2 O r~ J i O w c;,-._\----"' Y aW oJ AGENDA ITEM #7. b) 6` 2\ Toif..1ay 3, zo/ /e fre)-) jJ% / \7 2 — eem2T ` 72 2ti0_5 \ (c 70g ggk 2.3 j/ C j\ E 5 . 6 P. V. 2) j \% @ 7 f ƒ° )/\ \\ 3 /¥ # $ TIf // 8052 / 9 k/]/ (\ƒ r ' 3 / /f E t$ 5 k 0 -}/§ \ 2% e 2 /-Q - fe9 2 \ 27b\ /7 \ E 22 U ) 0'\ @a\\« 72. — r 2 § 2\ _=- :, a; :; j\ _a. k e - < 2 ( §«t co & /\ 94 7/3 ) c_, ca_ - X395§ g } })k (/ [\°\}\ \ I-Q li < ±1 g < vme J / \\ 2j _ } ))\ / / ` , ` AGENDA ITEM #7. b) r - Ta tea/ 3 -2.D!Y /f / ) 72 2 1-7,.. j / \ }\ IS/ \ 7 27 F„ 1,,-”:,.,1- 1 E 57 — 21g51)j \\ Kƒ & d / aa , cr.\ \ k Ejee ± [ 3f %\ z4, AGENDA ITEM #7. b) t O A, r 3/ zo E lk-r)41A 441 . TI e t NC!'.1.-N.IX3 t.Ili,i d-t_ 101aLSICI 2J3M3SV CINV 2:1DIVAA N:70 SOOS 7. C•47;:, 1 io-3, i Imf, •—: 1 I 1 7---i'r'fi.2 ."'-'-1-.'":,.. -:,', 4, r".-.'-., ''..'5::-. - =';''-: IF4I71 p Z..tC. t ; 3 15 i, :1-,--: i-e-i. 1•.-= T f-J,-',i', -!::. '`,,i': =-----: . t -LS:: i =7,--_;, '..1.---- -7 , -.-_-_-=. ,•-: IT 7. 7 . z s. ?.... 40 L--- :-. 7:, li 1 A ...\: -: ,-.'-'• - I.t- I .12 1 -- ', ''','•--..:-,„ _ L__. __i_, 11, ,,,- ,7.7-7>, ",--.1, ,"g-• R..t .---- _-_--`• : , i ."7-7."--"7--:-.;-."':- K- 4JD I i- VI r 41 i in 0 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) To May 3j 2m9 /E' IiLcr) daPS Denis Law Mayor December 12,2016 Community&Economic Development C.E."Chip"Vincent,Administrator Robert Wilson 21730 60th Street East Lake Tapps,WA 98391 Via email: doravin@comcast.net SUBJECT:Expiration Dates for Wilson Park 1&2 Preliminary Plats(LUA 09-140,PP,and LUA 12-013,PP,PUD) Dear Mr.Wilson, You have requested a letter from the City indicating the period of validity for the Wilson Park 1 Preliminary Plat(LUA09-140)and the Wilson Park 2 Preliminary Plat and Planned Urban Development(PUD) (LUA12-013, PP, PUD). Wilson Park 1. Renton Municipal Code allows for a period of validity of 5 years for Preliminary Plats. However,the Washington State Legislature approved an extension to the period of validity to seven (7)years for plats approved on or after January 1, 2008 and before January 1, 2015. Wilson Park 1 Preliminary Plat was approved by the Hearing Examiner on August 16,2010 and because of the extension provided by the Washington State Legislature,was valid for a total of seven(7)years, until August 16,2017. In addition,the applicant requested a one-time one- year extension to the preliminary plat,as provided for in Renton Municipal Code. This extension for Wilson Park 1 was granted on July 26,2015. Therefore,Wilson Park 1 Preliminary Plat is valid for a period of eight(8)years and will expire on August 16,2018. Wilson Park 2. Renton Municipal Code allows for a period of validity of 5 years for Preliminary Plats,and allows for applications submitted with the preliminary plat to expire at the same time as the preliminary plat. In addition,the Washington State Legislature approved an extension to the period of validity to seven (7)years for plats approved on or after January 1, 2008 and before January 1,2015. Because the Wilson Park 2 Preliminary Plat and PUD was approved by the Hearing Examiner on July 5, 2012, both approvals are valid for a total of seven (7)years, until July 5,2019. The Final Plat and Final PUD must be submitted prior to the expiration of the preliminary approvals. Please also note that the Renton Municipal Code allows for the applicant to request an additional one-year extension if requested at least 30 days prior to expiration and provided the applicant demonstrates that he/she has attempted in good faith to submit the final plat within the approved time period. If you have further questions, please feel free to contact me at 425-430-7286 or ihennine@rentonwa.gov. 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98057• rentonwa.gov AGENDA ITEM #7. b) December 12,2016 4]-i cA wte-d F, Page2 k) /I/14r3/ 2" /ette) Sincerely, t V.;` .,i fru, 1 1-s=f 1 . — v N of a—, Jennifer T. Henning,AICP Planning Director cc: Chip Vincent,CED Administrator Brianne Bannwarth,Development Engineering Manager Vanessa Dolbee,Current Planning Manager Jan Illian,Plan Reviewer 02FR• C:\Usersksmirante\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\Temporary Internet Files Content.Outlook\L40R7PID\Wilson Park 1 d 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98057 • rentonwa.gov AGENDA ITEM #7. b) Attach kti e Denis Law Mayor a` o- r Community&Economic Development C.E."Chip"Vincent,Administrator May 22, 2018 Mr. Phil Olbrechts Renton Hearing Examiner 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 Subject: Wilson Park 1 Preliminary Plat LUA 09-140, PP, 12 lots Wilson Park 2 Preliminary Plat LUA 12-013, PP, PUD, 10 lots Request for Denial of May 3, 2018 "Request for Additional Extension Pursuant to Renton Municipal Code 4-7-080" submitted by Robert and Doravin Wilson Dear Mr. Olbrechts: The City of Renton Community & Economic Development Department ("CED") respectfully requests that the Hearing Examiner dismiss the May 3, 2018 request by Robert and Doravin Wilson for an "Additional Extension Pursuant to Renton Municipal Code 4-7-080" for land use approvals associated with the development sites referenced above, Wilson Park 1 and Wilson Park 2. As explained below, the Wilsons' request for an 11-month extension for Wilson Park 1 should be denied. The Applicants Have Not Met Their Burden to Prove "Unusual Circumstances or Situations which Make It Unduly Burdensome"to Justify Obtaining a Nine-Year Extension The Wilsons' request an 11-month "additional extension"for the preliminary plat of Wilson Park 1, arguing that circumstances occurring since the Hearing Examiner's August 2010 preliminary plat approval justify an additional extension to July 5, 2019. The Wilsons' focus on the relatively short (11-month) extension deemphasizes that the Wilson Park 1 preliminary plat was approved eight years ago, in 2010. The Wilsons' new request would extend the delay between preliminary plat and final plat to a total of nine years. The Wilsons' request for a nine-year preliminary plat period fails to meet RMC 4-7-080.L.2's criteria for the applicant to show that "unusual circumstances or situations" have made it unduly burdensome" for the applicant to have timely submitted for final plat approval. 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98057• rentonwa.gov AGENDA ITEM #7. b) Mr.Phil Olbrechts Page 2 of 2 May 22,2018 First,the Wilsons' have not proved "unusual circumstances or situations"justifying a nine-year platting period. If the acquisition of the Wilson Park 2 property had only recently become necessary, the Wilsons' might have demonstrated sufficient unusual or circumstances. But, here,the Wilsons' acquired the Wilson Park 2 property seven years ago, in 2011. There are no current or recent circumstances or situations justifying an additional extension. Second,the Wilsons' have not proved that it was "unduly burdensome"for them to file a final plat within eight years of preliminary plat approval. Rather than alleviate a burden, the Wilsons' request indicates that delaying the Wilson Park I timeline to align with the Wilson Park II timeline is based in convenience to the applicant and marketability of a combined development. The Wilsons' should not gain advantage by tying the earlier Wilson Park I timeline to the later- platted Wilson Park; if the Wilsons' prefer to take the two plats simultaneously through the final platting process, it should be done so on the earlier Wilson Park I timeline. The Wilsons' acquired the Wilson Park 2 property in 2011—they have had ample time to bring the Wilson Park I platting action timeline in line with Wilson Park 2. Granting an additional extension for Wilson Park 1 would extend the life of a preliminary plat that, in the face of code amendments, no longer conforms to provisions of the Renton Municipal Code including but not limited to, zoning, stormwater, critical areas, tree standards, street standards, and retaining wall heights. Since the date of approval of Wilson Park 1 the City has adopted a new comprehensive plan including new development standards associated with the residential zones. Furthermore, the public concern related to retaining walls that stemmed from an appeal associated with this project resulted in the City considering and then adopting new retaining wall height regulations. For the above reasons, the City respectfully requests that the Hearing Examiner deny the Wilsons' request for an additional extension of the Wilson Park I preliminary plat. Sincerely, Ci tHiti Jennifer Henning Planning Director cc: Robert and Doravin Wilson Chip Vincent,CED Administrator Ed Prince,Renton City Council President Leslie Clark,Senior Assistant City AttorneyRyanMclrvin,Renton City Councilmember Jay P.Derr Jason Seth,City Clerk Steve Beck Shane Moloney,City Attorney File—LUA09-140 iT Y p^. NTO 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98057 • rentonwa.gov AGENDA ITEM #7. b) June 7, 2018 VIA EMAIL Mr. Phil Olbrechts Renton Hearing Examiner 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 Ref: (1) Request for Additional Extension Pursuant to Renton Municipal Code 4-7-080 2) Wilson Park 1 Preliminary Plat LUA 09-140, PP, 12 lots 3) Wilson Park 2 Preliminary Plat LUA 12-013, PP, PUD, 10 lots Dear Sir: This letter is in support of our Request for Additional Extension Pursuant to Renton Municipal Code 4-7-080, and in reply to the City's Request for Denial. Preliminarily, our request is not for a"nine-year extension,"as the City calls it, but rather for a limited and brief 11-month extension of the validity of the Wilson Park 1 Preliminary Plat, which is set to expire on August 16, 2018. Our request seeks to extend the approval to July 5, 2019 only, which coincides with the Wilson Park 2 approval period. The Code allows for additional time extensions of preliminary plat approvals "if the applicant can show need caused by unusual circumstances or situations which make it unduly burdensome to file the final plat . . ." As explained in our request, the Wilson Park 1 preliminary plat approval faced unusual circumstances, such as the need to obtain approvals and develop plans incorporating a second preliminary plat. Although the two plats are interdependent and necessary, the time spent on the second plat consumed a significant portion of the Wilson Park 1 approval period. To further explain some of the challenges we faced, attached are Declarations from Steve A. Beck and Darrell Offe, who worked on the plats. Both professionals opined that this project was unusually difficult and burdensome compared to other projects in their experience. Further. contrary to the City's characterizations of our efforts, the Declarations demonstrate that we have been working diligently and in good faith to file the final plat. The City previously granted a one-year extension under the Code, indicating that the City believed we demonstrated good faith effort. (See Code 4-7-080.L.1 (allowing a one-year extension if the applicant demonstrates good faith effort)). We believe that, if granted,the limited 11-month extension will allow us sufficient time to obtain final plat approval. Please let us know if you require any additional information to support our request. Thank you, Robert and Doravin Wilson AGENDA ITEM #7. b) A tracX t4- C 1 2 3 ' 4 5 6 7 BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON 8 9 In the Matter of the"Request for Hearing Examiner File Additional Extension Pursuant to Renton 10 Municipal Code 4-7-080" submitted by Robert and Doravin Wilson: j DECLARATION OF STEVEN A. BECK 11 IN SUPPORT OF REQUEST FOR Wilson Park 1 Preliminary Plat LUA 09- ADDITIONAL EXTENTION 12 I 140, PP, 12 Lots i 13 Wilson Park 2 Preliminary Plat LUA 12- 14 013, PP,PUD, 10 Lots 15 1 16 I, Steven A. Beck, declare and state as follows: 17 18 1. I am over eighteen years of age, have personal knowledge of the matters 19 herein, and am competent to testify regarding all matters set forth herein. 20 2. I have over 40 years of experience working as a real estate broker in the 21 State of Washington. My work has been primarily concentrated in the Renton/Southeast 22 King County arca. 23 3. I am currently a broker with John L. Scott Real Estate. Previously, I was 24 25 the founder and owner of a real estate research company called New Construction DECLARATION OF STEVEN A. BECK - IVan NessIFeldman ,„ 719 Second Avenue, Suite 1150 Seattle, WA 98104 206) 623-9372 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) 1 Services. I sat on the Regional Real Estate Board for King County in the 1980s, and in 2 1992 1 was the President of the Northwest Multiple Listing Service, a nonprofit, member- 3 owned organization of real estate professionals. In 1991 I sat on the first surface water 4I manual development committee, representing both the May Valley and the Cedar River 5 basins and the Highlands Redevelopment Committee with the City of Renton. I have been6 7 involved in land development since the mid-1980s, and I worked on some of the first large 8 developments in the Renton area. I have been involved in over 30 subdivision 9 developments in various capacities such as overseeing acquisition, and I have been 10 involved as a developer in approximately 15 subdivisions, such as a 32-lot development 11 off of Northeast 4t1' Street, called Beclan Place. 12 I 13 4. When working on development projects, I act an end product advisor, 14 seeing the end product and working it back to the dirt stage. I monitor and am involved in 15 I various aspects of the development, ranging from soils analysis; stormwater management, 16 design, and best management practices; lot layout and design; and access and road 17 standards. Through my experience in land development, I have become familiar with the 18 : regulations relating to civil construction and plat approval. 19 5. I first began working on this project with Robert and Doravin Wilson 20 around 2010. In my career working in land development, this project has been the most 21 22 t I complicated subdivisions I have ever been involved with and has faced unusual, 23 unforeseen circumstances. The site of the first preliminary plat, Wilson Park 1, had 24 attractive features such as quality soils and potential for views, but also had some site 25 DECLARATION OF STEVEN A. BECK-2 Van Ness Feldman 719 Second Avenue, Suite 1150 Seattle, WA 98104 206) 623-9372 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) 1 difficulties at the outset. For example, the site had challenging topography and required 2 heavy cut and fills on-site to meet grading requirements. 3 6. After we received the preliminary plat approval, we discovered the 4 property adjacent to Wilson Park 1 was going through foreclosure. The preliminary plat 5 approval for Wilson Park 1 depended on an access and utility easement across the 6 adjacent property. The foreclosure jeopardized the access and utility easement rights. 8 Consequently, to preserve the easement rights for Wilson Park 1, on March 2011 the 9 Wilsons purchased the adjacent property, which became the subject of the second 10 preliminary plat, Wilson Park 2. 11 7. The Wilson Park 2 site had complicated zoning issues, with an overlay and 12 different zoning designations on portions of the site. To modify some of the development 13 14 i standards, the Wilsons applied for planned urban development approval in addition to the 15 preliminary plat approval. This process was an additional unforeseen step, and though the 16 Wilsons acted quickly, the application process took over a year and received approval on 17 July 2012. 18 8. With the Wilson Park 2 site, we had to relook at engineering plans from 19 scratch to combine the two sites into one integrated project. Thus, we could not complete 20 final engineering for the Wilson Park 1 site until more than three years after the Wilson 21 22 Park 1 preliminary plat approval. 23 9. We received approval of our final engineering drawings and water plans 24 from the City and from Soos Creek Water and Sewer District on December 2014. At this 25 DECLARATION OF STEVEN A. BECK-3 Van Ness Feldman,„ 719 Second Avenue, Suite 1150 Seattle, WA 98104 II 206) 623-9372 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) 1 point, because of the need to incorporate Wilson Park 2, we had used up four years of the 2 Wilson Park 1 approval period and were unable to market or pursue final plat approval 31 during this time. 4 10. When we received final engineering approval, the housing market was just 5 coming out of the doldrums. We went to market very shortly after we received the6 7 engineering approval. We initially listed the property for approximately $90,000 per unit, 8 which was an appropriate starting price close to market price for this property and its 9 characteristics. We have had over six deals, though the deals fell through, in part because 10 of the economic conditions, the site's challenging topography, and the costs of 11 constructing improvements. 12 11. We have listed the property eight times, and each time we continually 13 14 dropped the price until it has now reached under $50,000 per unit, which is an extremely 15 ' competitive price. For comparison, one comparable undeveloped property within a few 16 hundred feet of the Wilson Park site closed in 2015 for a price of approximately $58,300 17 per lot. Despite this price, potential buyers have been reluctant to close on the property 18 ' because of the upcoming expiration of the Wilson Park 1 preliminary plat approval. 19 Moreover, the City no longer accepts bonds in Iieu of construction, which limits our 20 21 options to market the property and increases the uncertainty for potential buyers. 22 12. Potential buyers who have expressed interest in the site have informed me 23 that if Wilson Park 1's expiration date were extended to July 2019 to coincide with 24 25 DECLARATION OF STEVEN A. BECK-4 Van Ness Feldman 719 Second Avenue. Suite 1150 Seattle, WA 98104 206) 623-9372 Ii AGENDA ITEM #7. b) 1 Wilson Park 2's expiration, the extension would afford sufficient time to complete 2 construction of improvements and obtain final plat approval for both preliminary plats. 3 13. In my opinion, and based on the feedback from potential buyers, Wilson 4 Park 1 and 2 must be approved and marketed as a single development project, because the two sites are linked and dependent upon each other. For example, the stormwater design 6 7 is dependent on developing both sites together—the stormwater drainage vault for Wilson 8 Park 1 was originally planned to be within Wilson Park II, and was later revised to 9 accommodate both Wilson Park 1 and 2. This unusual linkage, combined with the site's 1 0 engineering challenges, made this a particularly difficult project and required substantially 11 more time and effort than any other subdivision development I have ever been involved 12 i with. 13 14. Moreover, because of the linkage, if the Wilson Park 1 plat approval were 14 15 to expire, the Wilsons will lose their significant investment in both Wilson Park 1 and 2. 16 15. Despite the challenges this project has faced, I believe that if the extension I 17 is granted, the project will be ready for final plat approval in time. I also believe the 18 project will add valuable housing inventory to the City and will help meet the current high 19 demand for single-family homes. 20 21 22 // 23 24 25 DECLARATION OF STEVEN A. BECK-5 Van Ness Feldman 1 719 Second Avenue, Suite 1150 Seattle, WA 98104 206) 623-9372 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) 1 I declare under the penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington 2 that the foregoing is true and correct. 3 4 6 Steven A. Beck, Declaran 7 8 9 10 11 12 li 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 1 22 23 24 25 DECLARATION OF STEVEN A. BECK-6 Van Ness Feldman,„ 719 Second Avenue, Suite 1150 Seattle, WA 98104 206) 623-9372 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) Alte?e Pt C 1 T 3 4 5 6 7 BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON S 9 In the Matter of the"Request for Hearing Examiner File Additional Extension Pursuant to Renton 10 Municipal Code 4-7-080" submitted by Robert and Doravin Wilson: 11 DECLARATION OF DARRELL OFFS IN Wilson. Park 1 Preliminary Plat LUA 09- j SUPPORT OF REQUEST 7OR 12 140, PP, 12 Lots ADDITIONAL EXTENSION 1' Wilson Park 2 Preliminary Plat LUA 12- 14 013, PP, PUD, 10 Lots 15 16 I, Darrell Offe, declare and state as follows: 17 18 1. I am over eighteen years of age, have personal knowledge of the n atters 19 herein, and am competent to testify regarding all matters set forth herein. 20 2. I have over 40 years of construction experience,ranging from single - ily 21 residential projects to high rise commercial office buildings to heavy civil construct on. I 77 have been a Registered Professional Engineer in the State of Washington since O4tober 23 1990 (28 }ears) and in the State of Wyoming since November 2009. 24 2 DECLARATION OF DARRELL OFFE- 1 Van Ness Feldman :_- 719 Second Avenue, Sui e 1150 Seattle, WA 98104 206) 623-9372 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) I 1 3. Since becoming a Professional Engineer, the large majority o my 2 experience has been in single family residential development, and I have worked on large number of projects. I have worked on projects in King County, City of Redmond, Sit), of 4 Auburn. City of Kent, City of Renton, City of Puyallup, City of Seattle, City of ercer 5 Island, City of Bellevue, City of Kirkland, City of Clyde Hill and City of Burien. N. table 6 7 projects include 1994 Street of Dreams — Summit Ridge (Bellevue); Pinnacle Point 8 (Bellevue); Rainier Shadows/Willow Park (Auburn); The Parks (Lake Desire/Shady lake) 9 (King County) and View Point at Maple Ridge(Renton). 10 4. My commercial experience includes providing civil engineering and s pport 11 for design and construction on numerous projects in Redmond such as the Pro Sports Club. 12 the Lakeridge office development, the Daytona and Laguna Office projects fo Hart 13 14 Properties. and Microsoft's campus. My heavy construction experience includes eavy 15 equipment operation and construction surveying for projects in Wyoming and Utat. and 16 acting as project engineer for construction on Shuster Parkway (I-705) from 1-5 to Dock 17 Street—Tacoma. 18 5. I am the engineer who signed and stamped the final approved engin;ering 19 drawings for Wilson Park I and 2. combined as one 22-lot development, and I wor•-d on 20 the preliminary plat and planned unit development ("PUD") approval for Wilson Par 2. 21 6. In my opinion, based on my experience, this project faced a num ,er of 23 unusual delays and circumstances. The timeline for obtaining the preliminary pla 'UD 24 25 DECLARATION OF DARRELL OFFS-2 Van Ness Feldman 719 Second Avenue, Sui e 1150 Seattle, WA 98104 206) 623-9372 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) 1 approval and the approval of the final engineering and design plans exceeded the a erage 2 timeline for obtaining approvals for a project of this type and scale. 7. For example, although the Wilson Park 1 and 2 sites are within the lity of 4 Renton water service area, the City granted permission to Soos Creek Water and '.ewer 5 District to be the water purveyor for the sites. This process took an additional two n onths 6 of negotiations between the Wilsons,the City, and the District,and the District had to .pply g for and obtain approval for the expanded service area. 9 8. Additionally, the Wilson Park 2 site had an overlay and different .lining 10 designations on various portions of the site. We spent considerable time working wi h the 11 City to determine how to handle the split zoning issues and what process the City 'ould 12 use, which led to the need to apply for a PUD in addition to the preliminary plat. Wh le the 13 end result was productive, the process extended the timeline for obtaining approvals. 14 1 9. The City also wished to condition approval for Wilson Park 2 upon 16 providing pedestrian linkage to the nearest Renton School District bus stop. The con ition 17 was unusual given the project's size (10 lots) and the confusing layout of school bus r utes.y 18 Thej'Peroct is close to the boundary between the Renton and Kent School District , and 19 both districts had school buses operating in the area. Determining the actual locations of 20 the routes and stops for the two districts, and determining the City's requirements .r the 21 walkway,required multiple conversations. We then needed to bring in a surveyor to p *vide 23 additional topographical information for the pedestrian walkway design. This process alone 24 5 DECLARATION OF DARRELL OFFE-3 Van Ness Feldman 719 Second Avenue, Sui e 1150 Seattle, WA 98104 206) 623-9372 it AGENDA ITEM #7. b) 1 took four months from the time we began working to meet the condition to the topographic survey. 3 10. After we received the preliminary plat/PUD approval and the engin ering 4 plans were ready for review, additional delays occurred. The plans were reviewed nder 5 the direction of three different supervisors. One of the supervisors refused to provid. final 6 7 approval based on the location of the stormwater vault. The vault's location had been shown 8 on the preliminary plat application and on every set of plans we had submitted to th- City. 9 so the refusal to approve came as a surprise. After the Stormwater Utility Dep. ment 10 approved the location, the supervisor conceded and gave verbal approval, but the process 11 of attempting to negotiate took considerable time. Further,the supervisor required than three 12 access ports be provided on the vault,although the Code only required two access po s. In 13 this case, we revised the plans to accommodate the supervisor's requirement. This p ocess14 15 of working with the City on these matters consumed an additional six weeks, beyoi d the 16 normal time period for review and approval of the final plans. 17 1 1. Despite the challenges this project has faced, I believe that if the extension 18 is granted, the project will be ready for final plat approval in time. 19 I declare under the penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washing-ten that 70 the foregoing is true and correct. 21 23 24 25 DECLARATION OF DARRELL OFFE-4 Van Ness Feldman 719 Second Avenue, Sul e 1150 Seattle, WA 98104 206) 623-9372 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) e. z A` arrell Offe, Deel 3 6/7/74 4 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1' 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 7j 24 25 DECLARATION OF DARRELL OFFE-5 Van Ness Feldman 719 Second Avenue, Suite 1150 Seattle, WA 98104 206) 023-9372 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) k- -cac4 cyh-t 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR THE CITY OF RENTON 9 10 RE: Wilson Park 1 FINAL DECISION I 1 Request for Extension of Plat Expiration 12 13 14 Robert and Doravin Wilson have requested extension of the August 16, 2018 preliminary 15 plat approval expiration date for the Wilson Park 1 subdivision to July 5, 2019. The request is denied. However, preliminary plat expiration is extended to November 16, 2018 to account for the 16 uncertainties attributable to the decision-making process in addressing this extension request. The Wilsons first submitted their request for extension by letter dated May 3, 2018. The17 City filed a response dated May 22, 2018 in which the City requested denial of the extension 18 request. The Wilsons submitted a reply dated June 7, 2018. Requests to extend the expiration of preliminary plat approvals are governed by RMC 4-7- 19 080(L)(2), which authorizes extensions by the hearing examiner to approve up to one year extensions "...if the applicant can show need caused by unusual circumstances or situations which20makeitundulyburdensometofilethefinalplat..." The standard five year expiration period was 1 extended by the state legislature an additional two years in recognition of the Great Recession that occurred in 2008. The Wilsons have also already acquired an administratively approved one-year 22 extension authorized by RMC 4-7-080(L)(1). The currently proposed extension would extend the expiration period from eight years to nine years. Wilson Park I acquired preliminary plat approval23inAugust, 2010. 24 The Wilsons raise some good unusual circumstances that occurred in the first few years of the proposal. Most notably, access to Wilson Park 1 was across adjoining property that went into 25 foreclosure. To maintain their access rights, the Wilsons ultimately purchased the adjoining property and then developed it into a second subdivision, Wilson Park 2. In addition to delays 26 PLAT EXTENSION REQUEST - 1 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) I caused by the foreclosure, additional delay can be attributable to coordinating development between Wilson Park 1 and 2. 2 The foreclosure and coordinated development issues certainly qualify as unusual 3 circumstances, but the record does not establish a need to go beyond the additional time created by the state legislative expansion of the expiration period from five to seven years and the additional 4 one-year extension already approved. The timeline in the Wilson's May 3, 2018 request for extension shows that most of the problems caused by the foreclosure and need to coordinate 5 development were resolved by December, 2014, by which time final engineering design had been 6 approved by both the City of Renton and Soos Creek Water District. Beyond December, 2014, there isn't much in the record to explain why it's taken an additional three and a half years for the 7 Wilsons to acquire final plat approval. Some declarations in the Wilson reply identify undated issues regarding stormwater design, but these do not appear significant enough to justify another 3.5 8 years of delay. The additional two years granted by the legislature was intended to address delays 9 created by the Great Recession, which likely encompasses the problems the Wilsons incurred due to the foreclosure of the adjoining property. Problems in marketing the property are not a sufficient 10 justification for further extension, since the Wilsons always had the alternative to develop the property as required for final plat approval, notwithstanding any financial obstacles to this objective. 11 In assessing whether the obstacles faced by the Wilsons makes it "unduly burdensome" to 12 meet final plat deadlines, it is appropriate to consider the public detriment in authorizing the extension. In their May 22, 2018 response the City identified numerous code revisions that have 13 occurred since Wilson Park 1 was approved, including amendments to retaining wall standards that was a matter of considerable public concern in part due to the Wilson subdivisions. Given these 14 public impacts, it is not considered unduly burdensome to the Wilsons to deny the request. It is recognized that the Wilsons development plans may have been put on hold to a certain 15 extent as they waited for a decision on their extension request. To mitigate against this impact to 16 the Wilsons, the Wilson Park 1 preliminary plat expiration is extended to November 16, 2018. 17 18 DATED this 27th day of June, 2018. 19 r 20 21 City of Renton Hearing Examiner 22 23 24 Appeal Right and Valuation Notices 25 The RMC does not identify whether a hearing examiner decision on plat expiration requests is appealable to the City Council. If the Wilsons wish to appeal, they should consult with their 26 attorney and the City's Planning Department to ascertain their appeal rights. In the absence of PLAT EXTENSION REQUEST - 2 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) 1 clear appeal rights, a common strategy is to appeal both administratively (in this case the City 2 Council) and judicially (under the Land Use Petition Act, Chapter 36.70C RCW). City Council appeals must be filed within 14 days of the issuance of this decision and judicial appeals must be 3 filed within 21 days of the issuance of this decision. A request for reconsideration to the hearingexaminermayalsobefiledasoutlinedinRMC4-8-100(1). 4 Affected property owners may request a change in valuation for property tax purposes5 notwithstanding any program of revaluation. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 PLAT EXTENSION REQUEST - 3 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) gra CITY OF RENTON Al aCIi Aienf E , JUL 0 2 2018 RECEIVED 1 CITY CLERK'S OFFICE 2 3 4 5 6 7 BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER OF THE CITY OF RENTON 8 9 RE: Wilson Park I City of Renton's Limited Motion for Reconsideration i0 Request for Extension of Plat Expiration 11 12 13 14 The City of Renton (the "City") respectfully submits this limited motion for 15 reconsideration of the Hearing Examiner's June 27, 2018 Final Decision (the "Decision") on the Wilson Park I subdivision's request for extension of preliminary plat expiration. 16 Scope of Motion 17 The City agrees with the Decision's analysis supporting the denial of the request to 18 extend the Wilson Park I expiration date. In this limited motion for reconsideration, the City 19 challenges only the Decision's grant of a three-month plat extension (to November 16, 2018) 20 that the Decision made "to account for the uncertainties attributable to the decision-making 21 process in addressing this extension request." Decision at 1:15-16. For the reasons discussed 22 below,the City respectfully requests that the Hearing Examiner reconsider the Decision and 23 issue a modified decision that (1) denies the extension request in full and (2) retains the August 24 16, 2018 preliminary plat approval expiration date for Wilson Park I. 25 Wilson Park I Renton City Attorney City's Motion for Reconsideration-1 1055 South Grady Way RN Renton,WA 98057 Phone: 425.430.6480 Fax: 425.430.6498 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) 1 suspended their plat-related activities while waiting for the Decision, such suspension would 2 not have been reasonable. Nothing in the code authorizes a "tolling" of the expiration date 3 pending the outcome of a request for plat extension. Without such a provision, in CED's 4 experience, it is routine that a plat's interested parties (i.e., both applicants and the local 5 government) rely on the specified plat expiration date unless and until that date is actually 6 extended. Finally,the unsupported three-month extension could allow the very consequences that7 compelled the City to urge denial of the extension request in the first place. For example within8 the three-month period, extensive site clearing and mass grading could commence resulting in9 tree removal, as well as construction of retaining walls, all of which would not be permitted10 under current code. 11 In sum, because the Decision's three-month extension violates the criteria of RMC 4-7-12 080.1.2 and could have significant negative consequences to the City,the City respectfully13 requests that the Hearing Examiner issue a modified decision that(1) denies the extension 14 request in full and (2) retains the August 16, 2018 preliminaryplat approval expiration date for 15 Wilson Park I.1 16 Respectfully submitted this day of July, 2018. 17 18 e , C. E. "Chip"Vincent 19 Administrator Community& Economic Department20 City of Renton 21 22 23 1 Even if the Hearing Examiner disagrees with the City's analysis and denies this limited motion for 24 reconsideration,the City urges the Hearing Examiner to not add additional time to the plat expiration as a consequence of the time taken to decide this motion. 25 Wilson Park I Renton City Attorney City's Motion for Reconsideration-3 as 1055 South Grady Way S Renton,WA 98057 Phone: 425.430.6480 Fax: 425.430.6498 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) cli ri,ent F, July 9, 2018 VIA EMAIL Mr. Phil Olbrechts Renton Hearing Examiner 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 Ref: Wilsons' Response to City of Renton's Limited Motion for Reconsideration of Examiner's Decision on Request for Extension (Wilson Park 1, LUA 09-140) Dear Sir: We are writing to oppose the City of Renton's Limited Motion for Reconsideration, filed July 3, 2018. Although we believe the record supported granting our request for an extension to July 5, 2019 in full, the Examiner's Final Decision (which essentially preserved the original plat approval period and extended the plat approval only as needed to mitigate for the time spent on our extension request) was not an improper abuse of discretion, was supported by the record, and should not be reconsidered as the City requests. As the Examiner found, we faced"uncertainties" and put our plans "on hold to a certain extent as we] waited for a decision" on our extension request.' The extension, if granted, would have lowered the risks associated with construction and obtaining final plat approval and would have increased the property value. Thus, no buyers were willing to close or settle on a purchase price until we knew whether we had an extension. Further, although we considered our options if the extension were denied, we did not want to give up the value of the entitlements or rush to begin construction ourselves, in case the extension was later granted. In short, both we and potential buyers remained in limbo and unable to act until we knew the plat's expiration date. At heart, the City's arguments fault us for being proactive and putting good faith effort into the plat and our request. The City argues that the Code allows a requestor to submit an extension request up to 30 days before plat expiration, and the fact that we received the Final Decision before the Code's submission deadline means we cannot show any burden from the decision- making process. But the Code's 30-day submission deadline is a deadline, not a recommended or wise practice. The City should not be punishing requestors who submit their extension request before the deadline, precluding that party from claiming any burdens suffered during the decision-making process. The City also argues we suffered no burden because the City received recent inquiries from potential buyers of the plat, suggesting that marketing continued. But as discussed above, buyers were unwilling to close until the plat's expiration date was decided, and the uncertainties surrounding the plat's expiration date burdened our efforts. Again,the City should not be punishing parties for exerting good faith (though impaired and unsuccessful) efforts to work toward final plat approval while an extension request is pending. 1 Final Decision at p. 1, lines 15-16;p.2,lines 15-16. AGENDA ITEM #7. b) Finally,the City suggests the Examiner should reconsider the Final Decision because there is a chance we may construct the improvements necessary to obtain final plat approval. The City's argument is absurd. The City granted preliminary plat approval for Wilson Park 1; that approval remains valid and has not yet expired; and we are undisputedly entitled to construct and work toward final plat approval. The Examiner's limited extension to November 16, 2018 only preserved our plat approval and maintained the status quo, extending the approval only as needed to mitigate for the time spent on our extension request. On the other hand, the City's Motion for Reconsideration effectively cuts into our plat approval period. First, if granted, the City's Motion would deprive us of the time during which we were unable to move forward while awaiting a decision on our extension request and the City's Motion. Second, even if the Motion is denied,the time taken to resolve the Motion re-raises the uncertainty surrounding the expiration date and burdens our ability to move forward. We therefore request additional time to mitigate for the time spent resolving the City's Motion. In conclusion, the City's Motion is troubling,particularly its suggestion that potential construction and final plat approval is cause for concern and grounds for revising the Final Decision. The Motion demonstrates that the City's focus is not on our unusual circumstances or burdens, but rather on stopping this project. Although the City has revised its development regulations, the undisputed fact is that Wilson Park 1's approval is valid, approved, and vested to the prior regulations. Moreover, no City employee has ever raised concerns to us about the safety or soundness of Wilson Park 1 or 2's design. The City's desire to impose its revised regulations on Wilson Park 1 is not grounds for cutting the plat approval period short or arguing that construction should not commence. Therefore, we respectfully request that you deny the City's Motion and grant additional time to mitigate for the time spent resolving the City's Motion. Additionally, in the spirit of reconsideration and in light of the positions and motives expressed in the City's Motion, we respectfully request that you reconsider your decision to deny our original extension request, and grant our request to extend the plat approval expiration date to July 5, 2019 to coincide with the expiration of Wilson Park 2. Please let us know if you require any additional information, and thank you for your consideration. Thank you, Robert and Doravin Wilson fl AGENDA ITEM #7. b) ei4+CITY OF RENTON JUL 112018 ( V 1 RECEIVED 12.•21 /m CITY CLERK'S OFFICE 2 3 4 5 6 7 BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER OF THE CITY OF RENTON 8 9 RE: Wilson Park I City of Renton's Reply in Support of Its Limited Motion for Reconsideration 10 Request for Extension of Plat Expiration 11 12 13 14 Introduction 15 This Reply responds to the Wilsons'July 9, 2018 response (the "Response") as to whether the Hearing Examiner's unsolicited three-month plat extension should be reconsidered16 and set aside. As explained in this Reply,the Response.does not successfully refute any issue17 raised by the City, and the City's Limited Motion for Reconsideration (the "Motion") of the 18 Hearing Examiner's June 27, 2018 Final Decision (the "Decision") should be granted. 19 Discussion 20 First,the Response asserts that the Hearing Examiner"found"that the Wilsons faced 21 final platting interruptions while they awaited the Decision. Response, p. 1, para. 2. ("As the 22 Examiner found...") (citing the Hearing Examiner's decision, not the record before the Hearing 23 Examiner). The Hearing Examiner did not make any such finding; rather, the Decision 24 postulates that the Wilsons might have paused their efforts. Decision at 2:14-16 ("It is 25 recognized that the Wilsons development plans may have been put on hold to a certain extent Wilson Park I City's Reply in Support of Its Motion for Reconsideration-1 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) 1 as they waited for a decision on their extension request"). As the City explained in its Motion, 2 such postulation conflicts with the extension standards of RMC 4-7-080.L for two reasons. One, 3 the burden is on the applicant to make an adequate showing of need; here,the Wilsons did not 4 introduce any evidence regarding their actions pending the Decision. In fact,the Decision 5 rejected as inadequate the only evidence that the Wilsons submitted,finding that the evidence 6 showed that all of the significant platting obstacles had been resolved by December 2014 and failed to account for why plat work was not completed in the ensuing 31/2 years. Decision at7 2:4-7. Two,the City explained in its Motion that even if the Wilsons had submitted evidence of8 delayed platting efforts while awaiting the Decision, any such delay was not reasonable and did9 not warrant the Decision's unsolicited three-month extension. Now, in their Response, the 10 Wilsons assert for the first time that they were delayed by the pending Decision;the Hearing 11 Examiner should reject these newly-made assertions. 12 The Wilsons assert that buyers would not close on the property while the 13 extension request was pending. Response at p. 1, para. 2. City's response: The 14 pending decision on an extension request did not deter buyers; it was far more 15 likely the remaining, underlying plat termination date of August 16, 2018 that 16 was deterring buyers. The pending extension request did not jeopardize the 17 Wilsons' position. 18 The Wilsons assert that they did not "want to give up the value of the 19 entitlements or rush to begin construction ourselves." Response at p. 1, para. 2. 20 City's response: These were business judgments that the Wilsons made when 21 they chose to assume the risk that the status quo(the plat expiration date) 22 would shift. Such risk calls do not meet the RMC 4-7-080.L showings for "undue 23 burden" and "unusual circumstances or situations." Next,the Response complains that the Motion "fault[s the Wilsons] for being proactive"24 by filing their extension request before the deadline to do so. Response at p. 1, para. 3. To the25 contrary,the Motion laid out the extension request's timeline to explain that (1)the Decision's Wilson Park I City's Reply in Support of Its Motion for Reconsideration-2 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) 1 timing did not reflect any inappropriate delay and (2) because the Renton Municipal Code 2 allows an applicant to file an extension request until just 30 days before plat expiration, it 3 clearly contemplates that decisions to deny will issue so close to plat expiration dates that 4 applicants must continue to act diligently. The Wilsons are not somehow less entitled to delay 5 their platting efforts because they filed their extension request early; rather, no applicant— whether submitting a request early or on the 30-day deadline itself—is entitled to delay at all6 its platting efforts while its extension request is pending.7 Third, the Response characterizes as "absurd" and "troubling"the City's opposition to8 the three-month extension on the grounds that the extension could allow the plat construction 9 to occur. Response, p. 2, paras. 1 and 3. The City's position is reasonable and grounded in its 10 code and in sound public policy. Due to its prior plat extension, the Wilson Park I preliminary 11 plat had an eight year approval period in which construction could have been commenced and 12 completed. Meanwhile, as the City explained in its May 22, 2018 request to the Hearing 13 Examiner,there have been a myriad of code changes that have occurred since Wilson Park l's 14 approval. As just one example, concerns raised by the public about the retaining walls for this 15 very project resulted in the City amending its retaining wall height regulations. Thus, because 16 the Wilson Park I construction remains unfinished at the end of its eight-year approval period, 17 the City's interest now is in preventing the unjustified tacking on of additional time that would 18 facilitate building out a plat that is materially and detrimentally nonconforming to the City's 19 development regulations. 20 Finally,the Hearing Examiner should deny the Response's two concluding requests for 21 (1) additional time to account for the pendency of the City's Limited Motion for 22 Reconsideration and (2)full reconsideration of the Decision. As to the former,the Wilsons 23 cannot reasonably have interrupted their platting activities because of the pending Motion for all of the same reasons raised in the Motion itself, and no further extension is merited under24 RMC 4-7-0801. As to the latter,the City incorporates by reference its prior arguments: The 25 Decision correctly found that no extension was warranted under RMC 4-7-080.L;the only error Wilson Park I City's Reply in Support of Its Motion for Reconsideration-3 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) acii 'tie4 ti 3 4 5 6 7 8 BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR THE CITY OF RENTON 9 RE: 10 Wilson Park 1 FINAL DECISION UPON 11 Request for Extension of Plat RECONSIDERATION Expiration 12 13 14 The City's motion for reconsideration is granted and the final decision on the Wilson's 15 request for extension of plat alteration is modified to remove the three month extension authorized in the Examiner's June 27, 2018 final decision on the extension request. The Wilson's plat shall 16 expire on August 16, 2018. As background, the Wilson's filed a request on May 3, 2018 to extend the expiration period 17 of the Wilson Park I subdivision. At the time of the request, the Wilson Park I subdivision was due 18 to expire on August 16, 2018 and the Wilsons requested extension of the expiration to July 5, 2019. By decision dated June 27, 2018 the Examiner found no unusual circumstances to justify the 19 requested extension, but agreed to extend expiration for an additional three months to November 16, 2018 in order to mitigate against any delays caused by the decision making process on the Wilson's 20 May 3, 2018 request to extend expiration. The City requested reconsideration of the three month extension on July 2, 2018. The Wilsons responded to the request on July 9, 2018 and the City replied on July 11, 2018. 22 The Examiner's authorization of a three-month extension was largely based upon presumed consent from the City and Wilsons that the extension would constitute a reasonable means of 23 mitigating any delay prejudice the Wilsons may have encountered during the pendency of the Wilson's extension request. However, the Examiner erred in his presumption that the City would24 find such an extension reasonable. The City's position is harsh but fair, as the Wilsons have 25 essentially benefitted from an arguable gap in the City's development standards that enabled them to acquire approval of retaining walls at a height that was not compatible with community aesthetics. 26 The three month extension also would enable the Wilsons to construct their development to PLAT EXTENSION REQUEST - 1 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) I numerous other development standards that are outdated by several years as well. The uncertainties that underly the time in waiting for a plat extension decision certainly can cause additional delays in 2 the construction and planning of a project, but there was nothing unusual about the delays in this 3 extension request that would distinguish the request from any other. The reconsideration process added a little further delay, but the delay overall was minimal as a reconsideration decision was 4 expeditiously issued by the Examiner. Approval of a three month extension solely because of the extension request review process under these circumstances would set a precedent for automatic 5 three month expansion of all extension requests,which was not contemplated in the City's code'. 6 DATED this 15th day of July, 2018. 7 f 8 rit,R7421,1_, 9 City of Renton Hearing Examiner 10 11 12 Appeal Right and Valuation Notices 13 The RMC does not identify whether a hearing examiner decision on plat expiration requests is appealable to the City Council. If the Wilsons wish to appeal, they should consult with their 14 attorney and the City's Planning Department to ascertain their appeal rights. In the absence of 15 clear appeal rights, a common strategy is to appeal both administratively (in this case the City Council) and judicially (under the Land Use Petition Act, Chapter 36.70C RCW). City Council 16 appeals must be filed within 14 days of the issuance of this decision and judicial appeals must be filed within 21 days of the issuance of this decision. A request for reconsideration to the hearing 17 examiner may also be filed as outlined in RMC 4-8-100(I). 18 Affected property owners may request a change in valuation for propertytax purposes 19 notwithstanding any program of revaluation. 20 21 22 23 24 25 ' It is also noteworthy that as far as the Examiner can recall, he hasn't been presented with any other plat extension request in the seven years he has served as Renton's examiner. Consequently, the Wilsons are not being treated 26 differently by the Examiner from any other applicant that has requested an extension request. PLAT EXTENSION REQUEST - 2 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) CITY OF RENTON July 24, 2018 JUL 2 4 2018yg P RECEIVED t0" City of Renton CITY CLERK'S OFFICE City Clerk 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 Appeal of Hearing Examiner Decision to City Council Pursuant to City of Renton Code 4.8.110(F) Dear Members of the Renton City Council: Thank you for this opportunity to submit an appeal of the Hearing Examiner's decision dated June 27, 2018, denying our request for an extension of the August 16, 2018 preliminary plat approval expiration date for the Wilson Park 1 Preliminary Plat, LUA 09-140 ("Wilson Park 1"). As explained below, our appeal is premised upon undisputed"unusual circumstances" warranting an extension pursuant to City of Renton Code ("RMC") 4-7-080(L)(2). Standing and Procedural Background We are Robert and Doravin Wilson, owners of Wilson Park 1 as well as the related Wilson Park 2 Preliminary Plat, LUA 12-013 ("Wilson Park 2"). We built a home, raised a family, and lived on Wilson Park 1 from 1977 to 2005 and are now retired. We are the applicants for the Wilson Park 1 preliminary plat approval, and on May 3, 2018, we applied to the Hearing Examiner for an 11-month extension of the Wilson Park 1 approval, which is set to expire on August 16, 2018. We agreed to proceed without a hearing and provided written submissions to the Examiner. On June 27, 2018, the Examiner issued a decision denying our request for an extension but granting a limited three-month extension, extending the plat approval to November 16, 2018. On July 2, 2018,the City filed a Motion for Reconsideration, asking the Examiner to revoke the limited extension. On July 15, 2018,the Examiner granted the City's motion, revoked the limited extension, and reinstated the plat expiration date to August 16, 2018. Factual Background Wilson Park l's approval was set to expire on August 16, 2018. RMC 4-7-080(L)(2)provides that the Examiner may grant an extension of a preliminary plat approval "if the applicant can show need caused by unusual circumstances or situations which make it unduly burdensome to file the final plat . . . ." In our request to the Examiner, we requested an 11-month extension of Wilson Park l's approval, extending the approval from August 16, 2018 to July 5, 2019. The related Wilson Park 2 approval expires on July 5, 2019. Thus, if granted, our request would synch the validity of the two interrelated plats. The following timeline explains the unusual circumstances surrounding Wilson Park 1 and 2: 1 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) On August 2010, the Hearing Examiner approved Wilson Park 1. This preliminary plat approval was based upon obtaining an access and utility easement across adjacent property. I On October 2010,the adjacent property, across which we had our access and utility easement, was foreclosed and transferred by Trustee's Deed. This foreclosure jeopardized Wilson Park l's access and utility easement rights, and thus triggered the need to negotiate acquiring the adjacent property from the bank. On March 2011, we purchased the adjacent property from the bank. This acquisition triggered both the need and the opportunity to re-evaluate plat design to develop both parcels with common access, utility, and stormwater infrastructure and grading to maximize the ability to balance cuts and fills on the combined property. On July 2012,the Hearing Examiner approved Wilson Park 2 (the preliminary plat for the adjacent property we had acquired from the bank). On June 2014, the City of Renton signed and stamped our final engineering drawings for Wilson Park 1 and 2 combined as one overall project. On December 2014, the Soos Creek Water District approved and signed the final design drawings for the overall 22-lot development. On July 26, 2015, the City of Renton granted our request for a one-year extension for Wilson Park 1, extending the plat approval to August 16, 2018. Under RMC 4-7- 080(L)(1), the City may grant an extension if the applicant demonstrates good faith effort to obtain final plat approval. In our request to the Examiner,we included Declarations from Steve A. Beck and Darrell Offe, two professionals who have extensive experience working on plats and who worked on Wilson Park 1 and 2. Both professionals opined that this project was unusually difficult and burdensome compared to other projects in their experience, and Wilson Park 1's timeline exceeded the average timeline for obtaining approvals for a project of this type and scale. Mr. Offe, our engineer for Wilson Park 1 and 2, explained the difficulties and delays that arose when designing, engineering, and obtaining approvals for Wilson Park 1 and 2. As Mr. Offe explained, after we had obtained the Wilson Park 1 approval, the foreclosure and need to coordinate development between Wilson Park 1 and 2 consumed a considerable portion-4.5 years—of Wilson Park l's approval period. For 4.5 years, we were unable to market or pursue final plat approval for Wilson Park 1. Mr. Beck, our broker and advisor, testified that we aggressively marketed the property, continually lowered the price to below market price and had at least six deals. Nevertheless, Supporting documents and exhibits such as the Easement were attached to our May 3,2018 request to the Examiner,which is attached as Attachment A. 2 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) because the market was still recovering at the time, we were unable to close any deals. Potential buyers have informed Mr. Beck that they would be interested only if Wilson Park 1 and 2 are sold together, because the two sites are linked and interrelated. As shown above, we have invested significant good faith effort, money, and time into Wilson Park 1 and 2. If Wilson Park l's approval expires, we will lose our investment in both. However, potential buyers have informed Mr. Beck that if Wilson Park 1's approval were extended to July 2019 to coincide with Wilson Park 2's approval, the extension would afford sufficient time to complete construction of improvements and obtain final plat approval for both preliminary plats. Appeal Arguments In his decision, the Hearing Examiner found that the foreclosure and coordinated development issues with Wilson Park 2 constituted"good unusual circumstances."However, the Examiner ultimately denied our request because the Examiner found that most of the development issues had been resolved by December 2014 (when Soos Creek Water District approved final design), with 3.5 years of the approval period remaining. The Examiner also found that our difficulties marketing the property were not sufficient justification for further extension. We believe that our undisputed facts and testimony do show sufficient justification for a brief, 11-month extension, and therefore the Examiner's denial of our request was an error. First, the Examiner expressly found that we had shown unusual circumstances and delays for at least the first 4.5 years of Wilson Park l's approval period, during which we could not market or pursue final approval. Although 3.5 years remained, 3.5 years is considerably less than the standard five-year validity period for preliminary plats.2 In effect, our unusual circumstances significantly shortened Wilson Park l's validity period, and the Examiner erred by not considering this shortened period as a burden justifying extension. Second, the Examiner erred by not considering the market and economic conditions as potentially relevant justification. On several occasions during and after the recent recession, the Legislature considered the economic downturn as justification for statutorily extending the plat approval period.3 Although Wilson Park 1 received an additional two years through the Legislature's extension, the time spent incorporating Wilson Park 2 consumed more than twice that period, depriving us of the benefit of the Legislature's extension. Moreover, as Mr. Beck attested, the market was still recovering from the recession after we obtained the approvals for Wilson Park 2. The slow market, compounded with our shortened approval period, created an additional burden justifying extension. Further, while we did have the option of developing the property ourselves, as the Examiner pointed out, we also had legitimate reasons to believe that we would be able to obtain a buyer before the expiration date. As Mr. Beck stated, we lowered the price until it reached below market, and we had a number of interested buyers. Additionally, my wife and I are now retired, are not commercial developers, and would frankly find it difficult to develop the property ourselves. The number of deals and interested buyers gave us reason to expect we could secure a buyer and to hold off on doing the construction ourselves. 2 See RMC 4-7-080(L)(1)(providing a five-year validity period for preliminary plats). 3 2010 c 79 § 1; Washington Final Bill Report,2013 Reg. Sess.H.B. 1074. 3 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) We understand that since Wilson Park 1 and 2's approval,the City has revised its development regulations on retaining walls and other matters, and the Examiner considered the revised regulations as indication of"public detriment" in granting the extension. Because Wilson Park 1 and 2 vested to the prior regulations, we are not familiar with the revised regulations. However, no City employee has ever raised concerns about the safety or soundness of Wilson Park 1 or 2's design. In fact,the Examiner found that the revised regulations related to "community aesthetics,"not to safety or public health.4 Therefore, we do not believe that Wilson Park 1 and 2, which have already received the necessary approvals from the Examiner and the City, causes any public detriment or impact. In fact, as Mr. Beck also stated, we believe the project will add valuable housing inventory to the City and will help meet the current high demand for single- family homes. Finally, the tone and the arguments in the City's filings are striking and indicative of the City's arbitrary and capricious opposition to our project. For example,the Examiner's original decision had granted only a limited three-month extension, recognizing that the pendency of our extension request created delay and uncertainties surrounding the plat's expiration date. The City asked the Examiner to revoke that limited extension, created more delay and uncertainties, and ultimately left us with only one month of our plat approval period remaining. In its motion to revoke the limited extension,the City argued that the extension should be revoked to deprive us of the opportunity to construct improvements and obtain final plat approval. Notwithstanding that Wilson Park 1 is valid, approved, and vested, the City's apparent position is that the project should be stopped, and we should not obtain final approval. Conclusion We respectfully request that the City Council re-examine the record in light of our arguments above, and grant our request to extend the Wilson Park 1 approval to July 5, 2019, synching the expiration dates of Wilson Park 1 and 2. This request represents a brief, 11-month extension of the current expiration date (August 16, 2018), and if granted, will allow us sufficient time to obtain final plat approval. Please let us know if you require any additional information to support our request. Thank you, Robert and Doravin Wilson Exhibits from the record (attached for reference): Attachment A: Wilsons' Request for Additional Extension Pursuant to Renton Municipal Code 4-7-080; Attachments A—F, filed May 3, 2018 Attachment B: City's Request for Denial of May 3, 2018 Request, filed May 22, 2018 4 Attachment H at p. 1. 4 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) Attachment C: Wilsons' Reply in Support of Request for Additional Extension; Declaration of Steven A. Beck; Declaration of Darrell Offe, filed June 7, 2018 Attachment D: Hearing Examiner's Final Decision, filed June 27, 2018 Attachment E: City's Limited Motion for Reconsideration, filed July 2, 2018 Attachment F: Wilsons' Response to City's Limited Motion for Reconsideration, filed July 9, 2018 Attachment G: City's Reply in Support of Its Limited Motion for Reconsideration, filed July 11, 2018 Attachment H: Hearing Examiner's Final Decision upon Reconsideration, filed July 15, 2018 5 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) A 1.---t-ac- Pk end-" A- Robert and Doravin Wilson (owners) 21703 60th St. E Lake Tapps, WA 98391 May 3, 2018 Mr. Phil Olbrechts Renton Hearing Examiner 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 Ref: (1) Request for Additional Extension Pursuant to Renton Municipal Code 4-7-080 2) Wilson Park 1 Preliminary Plat LUA 09-140, PP, 12 lots 3) Wilson Park 2 Preliminary Plat LUA 12-013, PP, PUD, 10 lots Dear Sir: We are Robert and Doravin Wilson, owners of the referenced properties. We bought the property of Ref 2, built a home and lived there from 1977 to 2005, raised a family, and now are retired. We are requesting an 11 month extension to the period of validity for Wilson Park 1, from the current date of August 16, 2018 to July 5, 2019 per provisions of the Renton City Code 4-7-080, Paragraph L.2 "Additional Extensions." July 5, 2019 is the current ending date for the period of validity for Wilson Park 2, Ref 3. This extension would allow both projects, referenced above, to be completed and recorded concurrently as one total project, which has been the intent since final engineering approval by the City of Renton in the 2014 time period as one plat of 22 lots. The final engineering design is based on combined development of both plats. This letter explains the unusual circumstances surrounding the two separate preliminary plat applications and the need to combine the two preliminary plats into a single development proposal, thus satisfying the code requirements for an additional extension. The following timeline details the progress of the referenced project: 1 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) Arch wiekit- A-- 1.1. August , 2010— Hearing Examiner approval of Wilson Park 1 Preliminary Plat, City File No. LUA 09-140. This preliminary plat approval was based upon an access and utility easement across adjacent property. A copy of this easement is attached to this letter as Attachment A. 2. October, 2010—Trustee's deed transferring the adjacent property across which we had our access and utility easement pursuant to bank foreclosure. This foreclosure jeopardized access and utility easement rights and thus triggered the need to negotiate acquisition of the adjacent property from the bank to protect access. A copy of that Trustee deed to the bank is attached to this letter as Attachment B. 3. March, 2011— We purchased adjacent property from the bank. A copy of the Bargain and Sale deed to us from the bank is attached to this letter as Attachment C. This acquisition triggered both the need and the opportunity to re-evaluate plat design to develop both parcels with common access, utility and stormwater infrastructure and grading to maximize ability to balance cuts and fills on the combined property. 4. July, 2012 — Hearing Examiner approval of Wilson Park 2 Preliminary Plat the property we acquired from the bank), City File No. LUA 12-013. 5. June, 2014— City of Renton signed and stamped our Final Engineering drawings for Wilson Park 1 and 2 combined as one overall project. A copy of the final engineering drawings is attached as Attachment D. 6. December, 2014—Soos Creek Water District approved and signed design drawings for the overall 22 lot development. Attachment E. 7. July 26, 2015 — City of Renton granted a one- year extension for Wilson Park 1 per our request. Attachment F. As this summary timeline and the attached documents demonstrate, we had to buy the Wilson Park 2 property in 2011 because a bank was foreclosing on the previous owner. We found out that our easement rights to put the road across the now Wilson Park 2 property to Wilson Park 1 would be eliminated by the foreclosure. 2 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) These circumstances delayed us in preparing final engineering for Wilson Park 1 for about a year and a half. We hired engineering to file a preliminary plat of the Wilson Park 2 property and began final engineering of the combined properties into one overall development. Combining development of the two parcels facilitated access, grading, utilities and stormwater design as an integrated project. The requested additional extension for Wilson Park 1 validity period will allow Wilson Park 1 and 2 to continue to be linked together for overall development. It has always been planned that the two properties will be constructed together, thereby allowing optimum grading of the roadway slopes and building pads without need for import or export of grading materials. A structural wall is required at the curve linking both properties, and the storm water vault serving both properties is located on Wilson Park 2. These are further illustrations the two properties are interdependent. The two properties have always been marketed together as one total package of 22 lots. Given the interrelated design, including the topographical challenges of the site, we have been unable to successfully market the plat in the original time periods for preliminary plat approval, despite dropping the selling price significantly over the past two years during a time when home and finished lot prices continue to rise dramatically. More interest is now being shown with our current land pricing plus the effect of rising home sales prices. Recent feedback from possible buyers, though, suggest that the timing of completion of the Wilson Park 1 portion of the development before the expiration date of August 16, 2018 is a real concern. We believe, with feedback from buyers, if Wilson Park 1 expiration date of Aug. 16, 2018 can be extended 11 months to July 5, 2019 coinciding with Wilson Park 2 validation, near term sale of the properties can be accomplished. This extension would allow development of both plats, as always intended. With the current lack of inventory of buildable land and new homes, the City of Renton will benefit sooner if we can make this happen. We have spent a very significant amount of time and effort and money to bring these two properties through preliminary plat approval at different times, and AGENDA ITEM #7. b) A±"f-rcitpke + A then combining them into one project through final engineering and approval by the City of Renton. The unexpected risk to our original access easement caused by the 2010 foreclosure presents the type of unusual and unexpected circumstances that your code specifies for our additional extension request. Obviously, we do not want to lose our investment by allowing Wilson Park 1 period of validity to expire. If Wilson Park 1 expires, Wilson Park 2 can't be built either. The two parcels are combined into one project for final engineering and construction as described above. This linkage between the two plats, one that expires in 2019 and one that expires in 2018 also creates an unusual circumstance beyond our control. We are sincerely asking you for your consideration and approval of this request for an 11 month extension of the period of validity for Wilson Park 1 preliminary plat approval from August 16, 2018 to July 5, 2019. This will synch the deadlines for these two interrelated plats. If you require any of this information to be submitted in the form of a sworn declaration, we would be happy to work with our land use attorney, Jay Derr, to prepare one. However, he indicated that the city code provision for extensions does not require a new evidentiary hearing and thus suggested that for simplicity and because time is of the essence, we submit our request directly. Please let us know if you require any additional information to support our request. Thank You, Robert and Doravin Wilson — Owners (253-208-3263) Cc: Jay P. Derr, C.E."Chip" Vincent, Jennifer T. Henning, Shane Moloney, Ed Prince, Ryan Mclrvin, Steve Beck Attachments: 6 4 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) w y tic .! AFTER RECORDING MAIL TO: e T , ROBERT D.WILSON 20080327002018 PAGEONUEOFTO@4 EAS 45.00 720 So. 55TH ST. 03/27/2008 15:17 RENTON,WA 98055 KING COUNTY, WA E2338944 03/27/2008 15:08 KTAG COUNTY, WA$ 1,429.00 SALE 80,0@0.00 PAGE001 OF 001 ROAD AND UTILITY EASEMENT ROAD AND UTILITY EASEMENT executed this 24th day of March, 20 8, by and between ERIK DORMAIER, a single man, (hereinafter referred to as "Grantor"), and ROBERT D. WILSON and DORAVIN A. WILSON, husband and wife, (hereinafter referred to as Grantees"). WHEREAS; Grantor is the owner, in fee simple, of that certain real property situate in the City of Renton, King County,Washington, legally described as follows: The East 317 feet of the West 1,003 feet of the South 318 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 31, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in King County, Washington; Said document(s) were filed for record EXCEPT County Road.by Commonwealth Land Title as accommodation hereinafter referred to as "Parcel A"} only. It has not been examined as to proper Tax Parcel Number: 312305-9119-00 execution or as to its effect upon title. AND WHEREAS; Grantees are the owners, in fee simple, of that certain real property commonly known as 720 South 55th Street, Renton,Washington,legally described as follows: Parcel 3, King County Short Plat No. 674217, recorded under Recording No. 7603170525, in King County,Washington. hereinafter referred to as "Parcel B") Tax Parcel Number: 312305-9125-02 AND WHEREAS; the parties hereto do hereby desire to grant a non-exclusive easement for ingress, egress and utilities over, under, upon, across and through a portion of the said Parcel A,for the benefit of the said Parcel B; Road and Utility 1:sisement-Page 1 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) t TO Mir 3 2-v/P L e O'er') WITNESSETH : NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION of the sum of Eighty Thousand and No/100 Dollars, ($80,000.00), and the mutual promises, covenants and agreements contained herein, and the mutual benefits to be derived therefrom, the parties hereto do hereby promise, covenant and agree as follows: 1.Grantor does hereby grant and convey to the owners of the said Parcel B, their heirs, executors, successors and/or assigns, a non-exclusive easement for ingress, egress and utilities over, under,upon, across and through that portion of the said Parcel A, described as follows: An easement for ingress, egress and utilities lying 25 feet on each side of the following described centerline: Beginning at the Southeast Corner of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 31, Township 23 North, Range 5 East,W.M., in King County,Washington; Thence North along the East Line of said Section 31 to the Northeast Corner of the South 318 feet of said Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 31; Thence West along the North Line of the South 318.00 feet of the said Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 31, a distance of 497.37 feet to the Point of Beginning of this description; Thence South along a line parallel with the East Line of the East 317.00 feet of the West 1003.00 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 31 to a point on the South Line of said Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 31 and the terminus of this description, extending and shortening the side lines as to terminate at the property line; EXCEPT County Roads. hereinafter referred to as "Road and Utility Easement") 2. The parties hereto acknowledge that both Parcel A and Parcel B are being marketed for sale. In the event that both Parcel A and Parcel B are sold to or acquired by the same party or related entities of the same party, then Erik Dormaier, a single man, shall refund to Robert D. Wilson and Doravin A. Wilson,husband and wife, all consideration paid for this Road and Utility Easement. 3. The owners of the said Parcels A and B shall be equally responsible for and shall each pay 50% of the costs and expenses of the installation, maintenance, repair, replacement and/or improvement said Road and Utility Easement until such time as said Road and Utility Easement becomes a dedicated City of Renton Street; provided, the owners of Parcel B shall have no obligation for such costs and expenses until said Road and Utility Easement is being used by them and for the benefit of said Parcel B; provided further, in the event said Road and Utility Easement is used only for utility purposes, the obligation referred to herein above shall be limited to those related to the utility purposes and shall not include obligations, expenses etc., as relate to ingress and egress. The parties acknowledge their intent to make improvements to said Easement so that the City of Renton will accept said improved right of way as a city street; provided, Robert D. Road and Utility Easement-Page 2 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) t e Pjp to 444 3, zo1i- Le My—) Wilson and Doravin A.Wilson shall have no personal liability for any of the aforementioned costs and expenses. 4.The owners of Parcel B shall have the right to grant utility easements over, under and across said Easement to any and all providers including, but not limited to, electrical power, natural gas, water and sewer,cable and other or related utilities etc. 5. The parties hereto shall cooperate in taking all necessary steps in dedicating or otherwise transferring said roadway to the City of Renton as a public right of way as soon as the road improvements have been completed in accordance with the requirements of the City of Renton. And as part of the development of either of the parcels described hereinabove (Parcel A and/or Parcel B), when the said Easement has been dedicated to the City of Renton as a public right of way,then this Easement, with the exception of provisions contained in Paragraph 2 above, and the right of contribution contained in Paragraph 3 above, shall immediately terminate and shall be of no force and effect. 6.Covenant Running with Lands/Attorney's Fees. This Agreement shall be a covenant running with the Iands described herein, and shall inure to the benefit of the parties hereto, their heirs, executors, successors and/or assigns. In the event that any party to this Agreement, their heirs, executors, successors and/or assign, retains the services of an attorney to enforce any provision of this Agreement,the prevailing party in such enforcement proceedings shall be entitled to recover their reasonable attorney's fees and costs incurred therein. LN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have hereunto set their hands the date and year first above written. ERIK DORMAIER er u)ti ROBERT D.WILSON DORAVIN A. WILSON Road and Utility Easement-Page 3 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) 7-0 Alay zoI £e//e ) STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. COUNTY OF KING On this day personally appeared before me, a notary public, Erik Dormaier,to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the within instrument and acknowledged that he signed the same as his free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes herein mentioned. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL this is.i9 day of March, 2008. F +, g810k es.'by 1; 5. C_Via` 01 A.9 'i`i, i Print . . -: Craig D. hielbar zU ` i„ , .• % NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at Puyallup t/.34*' V \G My Commission Expires: 8/30/20099i7. 0- rO l1ffQ4AAS` STATE OF WASHINGTON .) ss. COUNTY OF KING On this day personally appeared before me, a notary public, Robert D. Wilson and Doravin A. Wilson, to me known to be the individuals described in and who executed the within instrument and acknowledged that they signed the same as their free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes herein mentioned. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL this aLeday of March, 2008. f gS10NF+ '+, Wit, s O O AR % : Printer g D. hielbar y raig NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of pi q i BUB-\g 2' Washington,residing at Puyallup i ,''++F` 30-0.`' My Commission Expires: 8/30/2009liftfu ‘NN Road and Utility Easement-Page 4 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) 1-4 - rte,, . lv 2 /?'L firmer) 111111111111011111111111111011 After recording return to: 20101027000645 Patrick K.McKenzie MARSH MUNDORF TD 64.00 PACE-001 DF 003 Marsh Mundorf Pratt Sullivan+McKenzie,P 102»zale 12:Oe 16504 9` h Avenue SE, Suite 203 KING COUNTY, WA Mill Creek, WA 98012 E2464251. 10/27/2010 12:00 KINNG COUNTY, UA• X 10.00 SALE 0.00 PAGE-001 OF 001 Document Title:Trustee's Deed Reference No. 20061229002003 Grantor: Marsh Mundorf Pratt Sullivan+McKenzie,P.S.C.,Trustee Grantee: Prime Pacific Bank N.A. Legal Des:PTN SEC 31, TWP23 N, R 5 E Assessor Parcel No. 312305-9119-00 TRUSTEE'S DEED The Grantor, Marsh Mundorf Pratt Sullivan + McKenzie, P.S.C., as successor Trustee under that Deed of Trust, as hereinafter particularly described, in consideration of the premises and payment recited below, hereby grants and conveys, without warranty, to Prime Pacific Bank, N.A., Grantee, that real property, situated in the County of King, State of Washington, legally described as follows: THE EAST 317 FEET OF THE WEST 1,003 FEET OF THE SOUTH 318 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 31,TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH,RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT COUNTY ROAD 1. This Conveyance is made pursuant to the powers, including the power of sale, conferred upon said Trustee by that certain Deed of Trust between*Eric Dormaier, as Grantor, to Prime Pacific Bank.N.A.,as Beneficiary,dated December 22,2006,and recorded on December 29, 2006 under King County Recording No.20061229002003,records of King County, Washington. 2. Said Deed of Trust was executed to secure, together with other undertakings, the payment of a promissory note in the principal sum of$785,000.00 with interest thereon, according to the terms thereof, in favor of Prime Pacific Bank, N.A. and to secure any other sums of money which might become due and payable under the terms of said Deed of Trust. AGENDA ITEM #7. b) To tiles. J, 2aiJ' Le ffc-) 3. The described Deed of Trust provides that the real property conveyed therein is not used principally for agricultural or farming purposes. 4.Default having occurred in the obligations secured and/or covenants of the Grantor as set forth in "Notice of Trustee's Sale" described below, which by the terms of the Deed of Trust made operative the power to sell, the thirty day advance "Notice of Default" was transmitted to the Grantor, or his successor in interest, and a copy of said Notice was posted or served in accordance with law. 5. Prime Pacific Bank N.A., being the holder of the indebtedness secured by said Deed of Trust, delivered to said Trustee a request directing said Trustee to sell the described property in accordance with the law and the terms of said Deed of Trust. 6. The defaults specified in the "Notice of Default" not having been cured,the Trustee, in compliance with the terms of said Deed of Trust, executed and on June 28, 2010 recorded in the office of the King County Recorder, a "Notice of Trustee's Sale" of said property under recording No. 20100628000192. 7. The Trustee, in its aforesaid "Notice of Trustee's Sale" fixed the place of sale at the main entrance, King County Administration Building, 500 Fourth Avenue, Seattle, Washington on October 15, 2010, at 10:00 o'clock a.m., and in accordance with law, caused copies of the statutory Notice of Trustee's Sale" to be transmitted by mail to all persons entitled thereto and either posted or served prior to ninety days before the sale; further, the Trustee caused a copy of said "Notice of Trustee's Sale" to be published between the thirty-fifth and twenty-eighth day before the date of sale, and once between the fourteenth and seventh day before the date of sale; and further, included with this Notice, which was transmitted or served to or upon the Grantor or their successor in interest, a "Notice of Foreclosure" in substantially the statutory form, to which copies of the Grantor's Note and Deed of Trust were attached. 8. During foreclosure, no action was pending on an obligation secured by said Deed of Trust. 9. All legal requirements and all provisions of said Deed of Trust have been complied with,as to acts to be performed and notices to be given,as provided in Chapter 61.24 RCW. 10. The defaults specified in the"Notice of Trustee's Sale" not having been cured eleven days prior to the date of Trustee's Sale and said obligation secured by said Deed of Trust remaining unpaid, on October 15, 2010 the date of sale, which was not less than 190 days from the date of default in the obligation secured, the Trustee then and there sold at public auction to said Grantee, the highest bidder therefore,the property hereinabove described. AGENDA ITEM #7. b) I r1 , it ,,,,,, e , 7c' /I!7 3 2©1 f z elte,-) DATED this 18th day of October,2010. MARSH MUNDORF PRATT SULLIVAN MCKENZIE,P.S.C. C C142 CLO--&-1:c-- By:Patrick K.McKenzie, Secretary Trustee STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH ) On this day personally appeared Patrick K. McKenzie, to me known to be the person described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument as Secretary of Marsh Mundorf Pratt Sullivan +McKenzie, P.S.C. and on oath stated that he was authorized to execute said instrument on behalf of the corporation, and acknowledged the same to be the free and voluntary act of said entity,for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. GIVEN under my hand and official seal on October 18th, 2010. A6rISSIOIyfi, e 01 07;4Ry '^ Print name: ,1.L z._.- (b tl1..T„ SR!? cn cf,!Notary Public in and for the State ofT., ' 1..•;, cc' Q 3 , Washington,residing at . `IJjc ftt OA. S My commission expires: //—!(1— /3 F WASHING S'1C1catiPra a Pad6c 8aa4'Flc K.OmmuIi\TtWCs Deddot AGENDA ITEM #7. b) Ti /14 at 3/ 2 of f'Ce tier 1111 1111111111 201103170 00372Afterrecordrngjreturnto: NORT!{AOINT ESC D 63.00PAGE-001 OF 002 Robert Wilson and Doravin Wilson 03/17/ZOji 12:04 21703 60th Si E KING Lake Tapps, WA 98391 E2482673 03/17/2011 12:02 KING COUNTY, UA 4,485.00 SALE 250,000.00 PAGE-001 OF 001 Reference: 30048506-326-361, norihpolnt escrow+title BARGAIN AND SALE DEEDorderno.5pp!-;{tp THE GRANTORS) Prime Pacific Bank, N.A., a National banking association for and in consideration of Two hundred fifty thousand and no/100 Dollars ($250,000.00), in hand paid, bargains, sells, and conveys to Robert Wilson and Doravin Wilson, husband and wife the following described real estate, situated in the County of King, state of Washington: THE EAST 317 FEET OF THE WEST 1,003 FEET OF THE SOUTH 318 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST,W.M., IN KING COUNTY,WASHINGTON; EXCEPT COUNTY ROAD; SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. Abbreviated Legal: (Required if full legal not inserted above) PTN OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 31,TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST,W.M Tax Parcel Number(s): 3123059119 Bargain and Sale Deed Page 1 of 2 LPB-15-05(Itr) (rev. 4/2009) AGENDA ITEM #7. b) A i . r f CTD Ailey 3 zoo) Geffen .) Dated: March?4. ZOii Prime Pacific Bank, N.A. cwt// By: CXµO Qp Its:St-i.:•‘ r, '-')' State of Washington , County of oJnohof'Y1/S SS: I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that C.hLU&C is the person who.appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that (he/she) signed this instrument, on;oath stated that(he/she) is authorized to execute the instrument and 1acknowledgeditasthe . SCG of Prima Pacific Bank, N.A.to be the free and voluntary act ofuch party for the uses and purposes mentioned In the instrument. Dated: .3 _i jD/f Given under my hand and official seal the day and year last above written. Notary Public in nd for the State of WIC? Residing at o LL Wo/My Appointment expires: O(,` // C. M. PICKRELL NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF WASHINGTON I COMMISSION EXPIRES JUNE 9, 2011 1 . 1 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) W m,,s M U 7,t ( r mn 5mn8"c "y * IPUi evil- D, woi« a mNgE No f'Y'1 itl,cm El' N 1 Tov !V „X. 3 20!F Le tl're)-) @2r1 p NO^Uz-,A W JlZp Q C Z3w® wJ2w°o s=w> Z2w Lv f i 1 h .;i' >rrrt. V 0 W m4' ; V Z x 0Yr J ago i o3.wP OZxx d• 4' a• 4 yIn( WmoZJ_ W3$ Z.O wONz Zia aoo3 331,(7= WOJ ZOV z_ W¢.z N 0,-- u) p 2yaw o<- o w „ Li',,,, aZ W WZN7 aCrOQ0 JJ n M ON Z En''t vv Z O IY Q '., lJvJJ O 5c _o U< o z.,--z.,--.3E da_Cnno o0aa0-N-' wwwZzz vA pNN ¢ Q w p w}CK 7mmt.LIW2=8 n F- N =JWWO00.N> , ,O 1 z z L>.-, NF;H rgyrrr-,-' o O W N W L1 WO OJa=aW W r >O¢¢Q¢¢.2ZZt2¢tr m ZrOaU6000¢ N17,8 o U O Ln Z YOp3 1 z z -,- 1--1_,,j a' cvnr,n.nocc, Vt7Q 3 N a m 3w Fa- e-,), 3 w 1It g KN A- co lg li•,8a0mss -g = Z QZcJo a z-, 0 u i, d m s v 3s 3f1N3Av PuZOI w w vV N 2 oo as< F g€ j U) Z oNN 1- g Wi' W i, V V pJ/ 0 jw ON ng rig hlz 3 & o koa !$f O I I < 99th PLACE SOUTH Lcn_. C g Z J a oW44 G S oy IOpN0KCS SES)- ti¢O mPhW W _ L Z W mZ CNV yZ4 oU VI Son ZW U WG.M c'" 0 O L LL xo Q n Cn V azz dz gad r N O N_ d O v g w w z Li. z N1f10s Qv021 1081v1 d Z m o z a. g aGCo U 03¢ tii gWFrw > § r< u oW ' t-O W 6 &,,, KZ 0- W W D Z ' m ..se c33 W o s TO Src Y'c u i, _" 'Pg- a g: ! :.g Vieo' IgIWZCeQw 4.-1 :1;11<ti 0z r^ J 0 a oV m 0,971,0),01'9L9Z .Zb£1.10S R :. xM SO"8f£! 4o'£l8 i a7. 1 w Qn ti min n N Y fr A O W •--- ,' '''' W O W U t-,g F ts UU¢ NJIh I j 1I^ ,OW ISINwUuUI ~ yWL`¢ 'S WO 2aN C u> yj Z 4Ha l 024i N w h a . c• 1 o3N W V -a ng m !r4 c,M I CI W 5 t.3 O s NN CI OO HjW zls. WF, ioy 3 w mW NN t lffI 3.96,9£OON 33 1ZNRa o¢H w cMi H NN eJ 4. ''P wa o N 1^ 7.1 rz, gi4. E+Ii uxiF r"i o U m mil 0122 o W ZOV z 33 X033 0 I I MI LI w9pE‹ r 5, _ rc P o o d O zC U U n 2W N NZZ O O at I i jn\L4 Y 1w4'FUU vl .wFL8 a u n SO'SZFI _ _,SO'SZfI _ n W 3vi ut u e e N V H W r 0 z F 4071,9),oi oc9Z 3,t.co.00N 0,__]'J o ¢a naox ni ¢a nogx o ,zo 4 ;SP''.-4 yo zwwi o w_ $ C (Or7, FL ' a a ' 6 s O 3 4.743a '22 31s-n o; 6 N3 1 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) BoFz§ti» C.-) rig II .- 8 $ o o J$ fIWu- J Y4.r ' a i „ tAWXLi' 2 m o - DC ' z Z W- oaa^Zgg t a l YVI .r_f... 1r..1, y0 ` J JL> oy gip Ola 3'y %tfll rc,' ) 3 g 1 000 yO O N J W O Ln'1 E j y( P .tihril..La.- u li f f Z¢N.- 09waagcci2S /rY lli t 0 N fJ' J I- IN lig l\ It: 0.0717).015[9L A4J$0Llos n' c. o J 1+ y' ~ I O i 3 1 nsn- b I '( i'y c 1 f ' i i 9 O f N O in O Os m Os A dl rn s O,27,,,.T:S I d. • 4 91 1- j ” I 57.0' 50.0' 50.0' 50.0' 1 f.r & i n Q 1 _ 207.00' 01'13'42'°W b IWf175.00°92.0'LUtr) 1 F N I57.6' F, 63.9' I u G'I i TZ F o aI o i w N 9Y 6w N t i' I 89.0' ost 76.5' 1 1 m Z i oo il Too b ip O 1, 1 89.0' S n) 76.5•' I 1' 11' 1' 1' 111' 41. R d l ai o S"' Ip N.NII I atnl1J'3\ IZ1 Ooo loo OOo a ____---_U _ —_ `\lss \\ LLa Q O I S I d /I o 4.O N 1 89.0' 69.5' ti i m u N I m U I I o a U) d oIN zIoO` I' 55.0' 55.0' 55.0' 55.0' 66.3' O os 1- z I 94.7' 1155 °N lIY G,Gi- w 7 J6'2 _ 3-fJ xi¢ _ O o ps o U o 6 oaNNaJP co I O S. SS ~ p ,TI' O O O O o O p o J1 ® in ooJIosIOUyflSi0OaU pI_o fo, 2, N,_ s s mlrn3 i W OI oAF N4,\ N i=WW1— JV- N DOo 1 zz f o ' O •o O •o Oi < IAO o J, s 0 ; o4 F ..Q. IfOOmoOAoOAo `n ®I I oVeI tO$ z2rfl ml 1 nom{20' REAR B.S.B.L. 0, ' b a I rn I__ . 1_ 56_0_- 56.056.0 _ 60.0'_L_ - ?, iiz 0.0 IIo z t --2,—ILF;‘:- Ii sNW,,Ia UL= tY n c Iv WUFuUV N ' wa awz Em o WI UODU h Vn N I 1--4 2.),S)-_, 6 xm:-:,o m ` a Fiiii§ zoaiarin-,o a`o W3Z•0 J r 4 I w pyL6k4S-,?;8-8-8 .8 wasIDIn0300000 P d'._. W, ONNr.-N I2 O" a 1 l'''''.S' I t P VEtUUUUUUo.& R17,d ri--- i ' InL O 0ItIet Ie Ra,-, AGENDA ITEM #7. b) aim\ T V ti it ,. A S 8 S S f' n. J a 10 w 11 5 L7QN 4 41 rta Qat' J d W CrCCZZ¢ 4-1- t oQo m m w NNIAO To lety 3/7 ik letter/ ;,, 10,<,©0 0.51-`°0 h j r i rs i a, to Z W ril oo Al? rra g w'000 o' m o V Ot.' Li-'1°,"'"!r? w of 28 O i \, \-\\\\.. C 1ti.a aid, 000 z 3"F 1 /I\.,:':,:\\ y, r — fin J h< 093 ,-y5q -`. T• / 'Yr.,,,`• gf.. I fi W 0 19 12 3 0 a N. \ a w S Q co Of s I]YJ 17-'47 E / I,J;B ILL ti W 47 Lea . .i V ( //""/ \ 1 limas Q y Ojt f \ 1 yon 4S e<v 4., r w 2 ss 41 F. n /--i f Vp--4:.)--;• dad p gl 1 --r. vo: o tial_ 9Or I Llb'ti r poi M z f- yy.___Ai —zlc' ...\ 1 / w g w /— cam °Or 3j o i' — P a. U 6 .' ___________ g-1- 1 30 r - m p 9 I ry. s b Z D y s 1 a i s :p: _ 0, j \ 11 m p 1"1gg L(Jf w m \. i=r ise 1 1— J Y-i -- X ' `a d aOT5 N y.i 7"p 1 V v,. I i_ 3 be ,x.ar Y'_0 hx o i a M sr I rva1,, e 6 g Z aEr` ` ' 1 irs'" 1101111011# 110-1 31$—_.moo_,„ 1 ./` iw'C='•zti QIr 1.`:( ® i m I ..7„, g U LES r\ '6;' y- 91 Sgs• Z LL Z m ffi Re 4z i- lr,'-may 9 1\ droll-_'` CP\'' - a-----------i 1 g-I jai; '' 30 L _ let CkF.AftiNf Of((IYR+ _, '4 `Iii ,5b i ------, . F! ILLS l A sLz--- J• III I 4.K., lrs2,:j- g-gjriC` rl Zsz.' I is o it,... ,„, LLI 4 ; 1N — 0-- -- t N AllerAirillOrl ''Ci.' , i 4 ars—,, / d 704-iire, plity-p affilior._... Ly „,„______ et .-',02t;'^9k- 1..wAtiosi ma pins 3 r oftglyir----t a o 7icmoryg° * l - j/, I oI o y4 :`1.‘".. ...jA...Q. o IPA; I 1" a;?C:••.3 1 ONI211,310 3NI1 A1tl3d0 d tC 2' 6 } bl __4 fit° 8 itia Zd W 00 0Y o y aoz dq `c Jja 3v, 1.7 11 Uma Es d Z.,..6.StO LP a 5 r.PE W( 3p h. = Wmg eG UzX Ifl IGasrnao V) wm S y ijig3rvn uwaond J O O p w s€ z o AGENDA ITEM #7. b) To .tilm), 3' ' '1? /P tier, I( c a c a El s 'vi I c 8"E cv ice e, 8.u0 e a-c 7: = lymoCa 7, - i--.1 W El '-'.9N9V8.aOn w _ '17.4 U 3 c U ^i ' mOa ti ---1 - c C V'O.T W 8 - of.2, o at 73 El s02rywG8 ' !I m T d -E. O,y. m " = 71 o3R x ,..7.-1 -E >,-o W N E oI v; oag - yo_0 Q C> y 00 w U _I0C NOC sN ~ EC ,- 1q " vo TD --0 tea' o a 1 -1 O a ocoop i 1.! Q CS C 0 C..7 L 4 .-. ^I_ w R v E.a v'F j .r .-.I-21 mg toT E. 5. o - O f- ¢ 8 X o - I P c 0 U r W 2 O v V E L: .y • I nl V] C L no 8. C u 7 V410' V C 4. C C -f o; ,. ti I v a V 'JmTyO 'L.o _ _ m C(3 L, C E a p W a C --E1 C 9 CAA 4a7 o a a w a F-? 3 v w -c 7 y y a Q ` c O c h `- C o. v = y _ .r = u m 0.w u 4> a 3 aa o.? a`, m ' I s4A ' L A moano9Oa -. v 7 d a CJ ea. 5 c4UONII. 0 N3 ce n" wa 3 H E AGENDA ITEM #7. b) A 0 May 3, -.a Y jt. f j` ) 4 r V.,• c.) u ; a C N t,. C 0 0. e° 75.i w yu A v o ur, w L P_. .0 p.=a 4' v V .a r _ o 4 6 .iJ >+ E U U 9 ' SCi Z' V c.,,, C —61 ti s M. 0 -— G m a z u g cq.33 m 4 O 5-4 . 0 C.0 5 a V ^. W 2 ^ v N c X r d• cs 9 . n E'E C' 3 ri U_. n'C 'ryp ti C C• C )= of ' w i SFr", dN 4 v,- fil v O fir. G_ c C C. .'= > U S `> N 1J 1 4_,n G ` Ui T v AGENDA ITEM #7. b) t i.(-71 m,::: 71 To MA), 3, zot g let .,-) ld.H1E124 i Vd NOS-1111,r. ... Yir, r',..;?%-` , 1-,,,,,,,',',f,-•..7. `-"V•'-''''',!•'-'•• V•' Q 1.0W1SIG 83M3S CINV!:131VM>13980 SOOS 6%,r.__"-----,,-----,-- -i ';-_--,;:- .. ,',7,,,- --:;.;,-., ,:',,.- '6 w'=', 6' 26=--rit,',...rf:II • 6, g.5.-It",.., :?,,L' 1 , ..4-,q,,I •••'CN; I -,t5,3:-k --,,..:6• L.,,, f•-=,ff ...-,•=. -:-..'"'="! ?jf-',';',i,,,','At•i:= ,% '-,' ' 6•=- --,.T.•'' r,••.- i , 10.-'i,T'1 F--..i-,,LiF= '.=•- •...i,,,i-,t.• -t-,.=6! -=' 41 -1ff..,',---..,,' ,,-_-.._.,;'... 1 1,--,,-,., ',,,,;1: :',-.:i: •,,,'",:i.','. ,'..-;-;:i%.=, 1.2, ..-',Eyg-.--2'.-,,, r..,, ,,,-,:,,,-E. ,,,i„-....'-i,:ri, ,,...,-5,1 - L-:- ,- 1,:1,, .." 5•1 r,,,-....:- t-:",,.9.E: r.i ,,.,..,-,. i I i .,•. ',..::„:1::,:! 7,,,-., •=7... .1.-_•'.' 4...-, 7. 7,;;•"=,qi.=-: ••-•- l'VF ii.,,,- ,6 "i -;•;',.;,, 1 ',';', ----, :•,,..',,, :!:_t=';'-,`. !,:.,-;:.: "-•-•,-,,f. •••,rr-6',.'.=_,:t6 .6..'-', ,,C, '_!2:.r.`,A -•-.•:. I: 1, , -..=, --,-_,, '.-!,;:,7,-:= ',..6rf-.,,, f_.?7,26, ,•••-5.'-',,,,.-.,g5. ,•7=7'. '''',-, ;',.Y.I,'-',',4,7 .7-'61, L',2,-, F,,16:::, =,-.,,,6;- .J.,,,-5,,,j ,,,,,t75,,,.-!'.;-•,7 '6 6••'' .7";' , ''‘,.--:'12 6_77 _Y.! • I 07' 14, Z...,,• z0 o 1 I i •-•J;,-. ,-., ..-.1:2, ,-,,,,,, 2 rc' P',6-6• LI '?..''•--Z t4:1- 1Lx.,`,"; 9.:::,,,-, I ii- irij.,•!-,,i.-22,:1, t-,,,:,.L1,::, ;.--,12 2 c U i5 ,r--,, " z• s.,x7 , c!,. 0 ..,-,.5,-,77 w, ,,-IL). ai' i'.,•=1,_-2 I-i' L. 6 gi: .6,I:1'i'.., T.' 4Erf.,:: Hi' ;''.-!-,3'..,-..; >, i:.: I E: F-----7—--—7----i i:'--z=-,i,--;.• I i--,- : sr., rj: 4.. ...i,..,,h_ .-___---- ,-... 5,- 70,6',5.,7_____,„..,-.„ 7,7-,-,,-.•:: •, 1 , !F. 7 \'96'•' -.6.6. ! , ..•;-, •‘..1 '•,'.., 'ir;41' . I 7'7-7----i - jy-------li•, '-,5 b, ,4• .6,,..i -LI" 1,, ',. i- ',, 6. T-------77-777 I '1I--- i•••=--'-' I 1-I-----,-4,,,4,,,..i.-7,I •.',-lif 1ff-,, t ' !1,6:.,=!t'!=,-71.',..:!-I ‘.,'••., I , i —, ,,-.:,-.7-1 ,,i 1 ,,-I "-'.1 ' . ! I '-:-,"•,--:-. 1 1• co7s=',..-rr.„„ 1_ , ! , Lj, HT----------i,J., . -c-,. 1 --'•••; i'",-- 1-1 • :.- -11-'---'----- 4.z.,.7.-zat7-____---:,,i, / . ,,va`) s,:-..;,,T i L-: h-i ,'• -:777-:;‹,-, - 17 r• - - ,- ' •-- .-= ' -' 1• - -. t- Q .: '. .: •--- ._. 15" — 5 I, ri-E: 8',=' Y::.,- , - 1, -,,-, ,, — ,,,,, 1 ' I-.I ,:____...,--' • 1- 1-: —1 , 2.— I1..... cr,i.i.. 1u., to AGENDA ITEM #7. b) To Aitay zois, /e 4 Denis Law Mayor i December 12, 2016 Community&Economic Development C.E."Chip"Vincent,Administrator Robert Wilson 21730 60th Street East Lake Tapps,WA 98391 Via email: doravin@comcast.net SUBJECT:Expiration Dates for Wilson Park 1&2 Preliminary Plats(LUA 09-140,PP,and LUA 12-013,PP,PUD) Dear Mr.Wilson, You have requested a letter from the City indicating the period of validity for the Wilson Park 1 Preliminary Plat(LUA09-140)and the Wilson Park 2 Preliminary Plat and Planned Urban Development(PUD) (LUA12-013, PP, PUD). Wilson Park 1. Renton Municipal Code allows for a period of validity of 5 years for Preliminary Plats. However,the Washington State Legislature approved an extension to the period of validity to seven (7)years for plats approved on or after January 1, 2008 and before January 1, 2015. Wilson Park 1 Preliminary Plat was approved by the Hearing Examiner on August 16,2010 and because of the extension provided by the Washington State Legislature,was valid for a total of seven(7)years, until August 16,2017. In addition,the applicant requested a one-time one- year extension to the preliminary plat,as provided for in Renton Municipal Code. This extension for Wilson Park 1 was granted on July 26,2015. Therefore,Wilson Park 1 Preliminary Plat is valid for a period of eight(8)years and will expire on August 16,2018. Wilson Park 2. Renton Municipal Code allows for a period of validity of 5 years for Preliminary Plats,and allows for applications submitted with the preliminary plat to expire at the same time as the preliminary plat. In addition,the Washington State Legislature approved an extension to the period of validity to seven (7)years for plats approved on or after January 1, 2008 and before January 1,2015. Because the Wilson Park 2 Preliminary Plat and PUD was approved by the Hearing Examiner on July 5,2012, both approvals are valid for a total of seven (7)years, until July 5,2019. The Final Plat and Final PUD must be submitted prior to the expiration of the preliminary approvals. Please also note that the Renton Municipal Code allows for the applicant to request an additional one-year extension if requested at least 30 days prior to expiration and provided the applicant demonstrates that he/she has attempted in good faith to submit the final plat within the approved time period. If you have further questions, please feel free to contact me at 425-430-7286 or ihenning@rentonwa.gov. 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98057• rentonwa.gov AGENDA ITEM #7. b) December 12, 2016 7-ra/4 F' Page2 To Ad 3, z0/9 /~,t_,-) Sincerely, Jennifer l[ Henning,AICP Planning Director cc: Chip Vincent,CED Administrator Brianne Bannwarth,Development Engineering Manager Vanessa Dolbee,current Planning Manager Jan lIlian,Plan Reviewer cAaoxs\snmmn mm Internet FiR7P'mWimmPark I 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98057 • rentonwa.gov AGENDA ITEM #7. b) Attar'1M e,4P & Denis Law Mayor Community&Economic Development C.E."Chip"Vincent,Administrator May 22, 2018 Mr. Phil Olbrechts Renton Hearing Examiner 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 Subject: Wilson Park 1 Preliminary Plat LUA 09-140, PP, 12 lots Wilson Park 2 Preliminary Plat LUA 12-013, PP, PUD, 10 lots Request for Denial of May 3, 2018 "Request for Additional Extension Pursuant to Renton Municipal Code 4-7-080" submitted by Robert and Doravin Wilson Dear Mr. Olbrechts: The City of Renton Community& Economic Development Department ("CED") respectfully requests that the Hearing Examiner dismiss the May 3, 2018 request by Robert and Doravin Wilson for an "Additional Extension Pursuant to Renton Municipal Code 4-7-080"for land use approvals associated with the development sites referenced above, Wilson Park 1 and Wilson Park 2. As explained below, the Wilsons' request for an 11-month extension for Wilson Park 1 should be denied. The Applicants Have Not Met Their Burden to Prove "Unusual Circumstances or Situations which Make It Unduly Burdensome"to Justify Obtaining a Nine-Year Extension The Wilsons' request an 11-month "additional extension"for the preliminary plat of Wilson Park 1, arguing that circumstances occurring since the Hearing Examiner's August 2010 preliminary plat approval justify an additional extension to July 5, 2019. The Wilsons'focus on the relatively short (11-month) extension deemphasizes that the Wilson Park 1 preliminary plat was approved eight years ago, in 2010. The Wilsons' new request would extend the delay between preliminary plat and final plat to a total of nine years. The Wilsons' request for a nine-year preliminary plat period fails to meet RMC 4-7-080.L.2's criteria for the applicant to show that "unusual circumstances or situations" have made it unduly burdensome" for the applicant to have timely submitted for final plat approval. 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98057• rentonwa.gov AGENDA ITEM #7. b) Mr.Phil Olbrechts Page 2 of 2 May 22,2018 First, the Wilsons' have not proved "unusual circumstances or situations"justifying a nine-yearplattingperiod. If the acquisition of the Wilson Park 2 property had only recently becomenecessary, the Wilsons' might have demonstrated sufficient unusual or circumstances. But,here, the Wilsons' acquired the Wilson Park 2 property seven years ago, in 2011. There are nocurrentorrecentcircumstancesorsituationsjustifyinganadditionalextension. Second,the Wilsons' have not proved that it was "unduly burdensome"for them to file a final plat within eight years of preliminary plat approval. Rather than alleviate a burden, the Wilsons' request indicates that delaying the Wilson Park I timeline to align with the Wilson ParkIItimelineisbasedinconveniencetotheapplicantandmarketabilityofacombineddevelopment. The Wilsons' should not gain advantage by tying the earlier Wilson Park I timeline to the later- platted Wilson Park; if the Wilsons' prefer to take the two plats simultaneously through thefinalplattingprocess, it should be done so on the earlier Wilson Park I timeline. The Wilsons'acquired the Wilson Park 2 property in 2011—they have had ample time to bring the WilsonParkIplattingactiontimelineinlinewithWilsonPark2. Granting an additional extension for Wilson Park 1 would extend the life of a preliminary platthat, in the face of code amendments, no longer conforms to provisions of the Renton Municipal Code including but not limited to, zoning, stormwater, critical areas, tree standards, street standards, and retaining wall heights. Since the date of approval of Wilson Park 1 the City has adopted a new comprehensive plan including new development standards associated with the residential zones. Furthermore, the public concern related to retaining walls that stemmed from an appeal associated with this project resulted in the City considering and thenadoptingnewretainingwallheightregulations. For the above reasons, the City respectfully requests that the Hearing Examiner deny theWilsons' request for an additional extension of the Wilson Park I preliminary plat. Sincerely, tet, t; -1-04 1t-,, - Jennifer Henning Planning Director cc: Robert and Doravin Wilson Chip Vincent,CED AdministratorEdPrince,Renton City Council President Leslie Clark,Senior Assistant City AttorneyRyanMclrvin,Renton City Councilmember Jay P. Derr Jason Seth,City Clerk Steve Beck Shane Moloney,City Attorney File—LUA09-140 c,k1 Y o; 4A4TQ . 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98057 • rentonwa.gov AGENDA ITEM #7. b) A-i-a,4C- June 7, 2018 VIA EMAIL Mr. Phil Olbrechts Renton Hearing Examiner 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 Ref: (1) Request for Additional Extension Pursuant to Renton Municipal Code 4-7-080 2) Wilson Park 1 Preliminary Plat LUA 09-140, PP, 12 lots 3) Wilson Park 2 Preliminary Plat LUA 12-013, PP, PUD, 10 lots Dear Sir: This letter is in support of our Request for Additional Extension Pursuant to Renton Municipal Code 4-7-080, and in reply to the City's Request for Denial. Preliminarily, our request is not for a"nine-year extension,"as the City calls it, but rather for a limited and brief 11-month extension of the validity of the Wilson Park 1 Preliminary Plat, which is set to expire on August 16, 2018. Our request seeks to extend the approval to July 5, 2019 only, which coincides with the Wilson Park 2 approval period. The Code allows for additional time extensions of preliminary plat approvals "if the applicant can show need caused by unusual circumstances or situations which make it unduly burdensome to file the final plat . . ." As explained in our request, the Wilson Park 1 preliminary plat approval faced unusual circumstances, such as the need to obtain approvals and develop plans incorporating a second preliminary plat. Although the two plats are interdependent and necessary, the time spent on the second plat consumed a significant portion of the Wilson Park 1 approval period. To further explain some of the challenges we faced, attached are Declarations from Steve A. Beck and Darrell Offe, who worked on the plats. Both professionals opined that this project was unusually difficult and burdensome compared to other projects in their experience. Further, contrary to the City's characterizations of our efforts, the Declarations demonstrate that we have been working diligently and in good faith to file the final plat. The City previously granted a one-year extension under the Code, indicating that the City believed we demonstrated good faith effort. (See Code 4-7-080.L.1 (allowing a one-year extension if the applicant demonstrates good faith effort)). We believe that, if granted, the limited 11-month extension will allow us sufficient time to obtain final plat approval. Please let us know if you require any additional information to support our request. Thank you, Robert and Doravin Wilson AGENDA ITEM #7. b) A-ttracA 1.4 e`cf c 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON 8 9 In the Matter of the"Request for Hearing Examiner File Additional Extension Pursuant to Renton 10 Municipal Code 4-7-080" submitted by Robert and Doravin Wilson: j DECLARATION OF STEVEN A. BECK 11 f IN SUPPORT OF REQUEST FOR Wilson Park 1 Preliminary Plat LUA 09- ADDITIONAL EXTENTION 12 140, PP, 12 Lots 13 Wilson Park 2 Preliminary Plat LUA 12- 14 013, PP,PUD, 10 Lots 15 16 17 I, Steven A. Beck, declare and state as follows: 18 1. I am over eighteen years of age, have personal knowledge of the matters 19 herein, and am competent to testify regarding all matters set forth herein. 20 2. I have over 40 years of experience working as a real estate broker in the 21 State of Washington. My work has been primarily concentrated in the Renton/Southeast 22 King County arca. 23 3. I am currently a broker with John L. Scott Real Estate. Previously, I was 24 25 the founder and owner of a real estate research company called New Construction DECLARATION OF STEVEN A. BECK- 1 I Van Ness Feldman «„ 719 Second Avenue, Suite 1150 Seattle, WA 98104 206) 623-9372 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) 1 Services. I sat on the Regional Real Estate Board for King County in the 1980s, and in 2 1992 I was the President of the Northwest Multiple Listing Service, a nonprofit, member- 3 owned organization of real estate professionals. In 1991 I sat on the first surface water 4 manual development committee, representing both the May Valley and the Cedar River 5 basins and the Highlands Redevelopment Committee with the City of Renton. I have been 6 7 involved in land development since the mid-1980s, and I worked on some of the first large 8 developments in the Renton area. I have been involved in over 30 subdivision 9 developments in various capacities such as overseeing acquisition, and I have been 10 involved as a developer in approximately 15 subdivisions, such as a 32-lot development 11 off of Northeast 4th Street, called Beclan Place. 12 4. When working on development projects, 1 act an end product advisor, 13 14 seeing the end product and working it back to the dirt stage. I monitor and am involved in 15 various aspects of the development, ranging from soils analysis; stormwater management, 16 design, and best management practices; lot layout and design; and access and road 17 standards. Through my experience in land development, I have become familiar with the 18 regulations relating to civil construction and plat approval. 19 5. I first began working on this project with Robert and Doravin Wilson 20 around 2010. In my career working in land development, this project has been the most 21 22 complicated subdivisions I have ever been involved with and has faced unusual, 23 unforeseen circumstances. The site of the first preliminary plat, Wilson Park 1, had 24 attractive features such as quality soils and potential for views, but also had some site 25 DECLARATION OF STEVEN A. BECK-2 Van Ness Feldman 719 Second Avenue, Suite 1150 Seattle, WA 98104 206) 623-9372 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) 1 difficulties at the outset. For example, the site had challenging topography and required 2 heavy cut and fills on-site to meet grading requirements. 3 6. After we received the preliminary plat approval, we discovered the 4 property adjacent to Wilson Park 1 was going through foreclosure. The preliminary plat 5 approval for Wilson Park 1 depended on an access and utility easement across the 6 7 adjacent property. The foreclosure jeopardized the access and utility easement rights. 8 Consequently, to preserve the easement rights for Wilson Park 1, on March 2011 the 9 Wilsons purchased the adjacent property, which became the subject of the second 10 preliminary plat, Wilson Park 2. 11 7. The Wilson Park 2 site had complicated zoning issues, with an overlay and 12 different zoning designations on portions of the site. To modify some of the development 13 14 standards, the Wilsons applied for planned urban development approval in addition to the 15 preliminary plat approval. This process was an additional unforeseen step, and though the 16 Wilsons acted quickly, the application process took over a year and received approval on 17 July 2012. 18 8.With the Wilson Park 2 site, we had to relook at engineering plans from 19 scratch to combine the two sites into one integrated project. Thus, we could not complete 20 final engineering for the Wilson Park 1 site until more than three years after the Wilson 21 22 Park 1 preliminary plat approval. 23 9. We received approval of our final engineering drawings and water plans 24 from the City and from Soos Creek Water and Sewer District on December 2014. At this 25 DECLARATION OF STEVEN A. BECK-3 Van Ness Feldman 719 Second Avenue, Suite 1150 Seattle, WA 98104 206) 623-9372 1 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) 1 point, because of the need to incorporate Wilson Park 2, we had used up four years of the 2 Wilson Park 1 approval period and were unable to market or pursue final plat approval 3 during this time. 4 10. When we received final engineering approval, the housing market was just 5 coming out of the doldrums. We went to market very shortly after we received the 6 7 engineering approval. We initially listed the property for approximately $90,000 per unit, 8 which was an appropriate starting price close to market price for this property and its 9 characteristics. We have had over six deals, though the deals fell through, in part because 10 of the economic conditions, the site's challenging topography, and the costs of 11 constructing improvements. 12 11. We have listed the property eight times, and each time we continually 13 14 dropped the price until it has now reached under $50,000 per unit, which is an extremely 15 competitive price. For comparison, one comparable undeveloped property within a few 16 hundred feet of the Wilson Park site closed in 2015 for a price of approximately $58,300 17 per lot. Despite this price, potential buyers have been reluctant to close on the property 18 because of the upcoming expiration of the Wilson Park 1 preliminary plat approval. 19 Moreover, the City no longer accepts bonds in lieu of construction, which limits our 20 options to market the property and increases the uncertainty for potential buyers. 21 22 12. Potential buyers who have expressed interest in the site have informed me 23 that if Wilson Park 1's expiration date were extended to July 2019 to coincide with 24 25 DECLARATION OF STEVEN A. BECK-4 Van Ness Feldman h. 719 Second Avenue, Suite 1150 Seattle, WA 98104 206) 623-9372 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) 1 Wilson Park 2's expiration, the extension would afford sufficient time to complete 2 construction of improvements and obtain final plat approval for both preliminary plats. 3 13. In my opinion, and based on the feedback from potential buyers, Wilson 4 Park 1 and 2 must be approved and marketed as a single development project, because the 5 two sites are linked and dependent upon each other. For example, the stormwater design 6 7 is dependent on developing both sites together—the stormwater drainage vault for Wilson 8 Park 1 was originally planned to be within Wilson Park II, and was later revised to 9 accommodate both Wilson Park 1 and 2. This unusual linkage, combined with the site's 10 engineering challenges, made this a particularly difficult project and required substantially 11 more time and effort than any other subdivision development I have ever been involved 12 with. 13 14 14. Moreover, because of the linkage, if the Wilson Park 1 plat approval were 15 to expire, the Wilsons will lose their significant investment in both Wilson Park 1 and 2. 16 15. Despite the challenges this project has faced, I believe that if the extension 17 is granted, the project will be ready for final plat approval in time. I also believe the 18 project will add valuable housing inventory to the City and will help meet the current high 19 demand for single-family homes. 20 21 22 // 23 24 25 DECLARATION OF STEVEN A. BECK-5 Van Ness Feldman 719 Second Avenue, Suite 1150 Seattle, WA 98104 206) 623-9372 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) 1 I declare under the penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington 2 that the foregoing is true and correct. 3 ii4 4 5 1‘, 6 Steven A. Beck, Dcclaran 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 , 22 23 24 25 DECLARATION OF STEVEN A. BECK-6 Van Ness Feldman«n 719 Second Avenue, Suite 1150 Seattle, WA 98104 206) 623-9372 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) Art-e(Gil Yk ektf C 1 7 3 4 7 6 7 BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON 8 9 In the Matter of the"Request for Hearing Examiner. File Additional Extension Pursuant to Renton 10 Municipal Code 4-7-080" submitted by Robert and Doravin Wilson: 11 DECLARATION OF DARRELL OFF- I_N Wilson. Park 1 Preliminary Plat LUA 09- SUPPORT OF REQUEST OR 12 140, PP, 12 Lots ADDITIONAL EXTENSION 13 Wilson Park 2 Preliminary Plat LUA 12- 14 013, PP, PUD, 10 Lots 15 16 I, Darrell Offe,declare and state as follows: 17 18 1. I am over eighteen years of age, have personal knowledge of the n afters 19 herein, and am competent to testify regarding all matters set forth herein. 20 2. I have over 40 years of construction experience,ranging from single .milt' L1 residential projects to high rise commercial office buildings to heavy civil construct on. I 22 have been a Registered Professional Engineer in the State of Washington since October 23 1990 (28 years) and in the State of Wyoming since November 2009. 74 25 DECLARATION OF DARRELL OFFE- 1 Van Ness Feldman 719 Second Avenue, Sui e 1150 Seattle, WA 98104 206) 623-9372 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) 1 3. Since becoming a Professional Engineer, the large majority o my 2 experience has been in single family residential development, and I have worked on large 3 number of projects. I have worked on projects in King County, City of Redmond, Oily of 4 Auburn, City of Kent, City of Renton, City of Puyallup, City of Seattle, City of ercer 5 Island, City of Bellevue, City of Kirkland, City of Clyde Hill and City of Burien. N. table 6 7 projects include 1994 Street of Dreams — Summit Ridge (Bellevue); Pinnacle Point 8 (Bellevue); Rainier Shadows/Willow Park (Auburn); The Parks (Lake Desire/Shady lake) 9 (King County) and View Point at Maple Ridge(Renton). 1 0 4. My commercial experience includes providing civil engineering and s pport it for design and construction on numerous projects in Redmond such as the Pro Sports Club. 12 the Lakeridge office development, the Daytona and Laguna Office projects fo Hart 13 14 Properties, and Microsoft's campus. My heavy construction experience includes eavy 15 equipment operation and construction surveying for projects in Wyoming and Utas, and 16 acting as project engineer for construction on Shuster Parkway (I-705) from 1-5 to Dock 17 Street—Tacoma. 18 5. I am the engineer who signed and stamped the final approved engin:ering 19 drawings for Wilson Park 1 and 2, combined as one 22-lot development, and I wor 4-d on 20 the preliminary plat and planned unit development ("PUD") approval for Wilson Par 2. 21 22 6. In my opinion, based on my experience, this project faced a num er of 23 unusual delays and circumstances. The timeline for obtaining the preliminary pla PUD 24 25 DECLARATION OF DARRELL OFFE-2 Van Ness Feldman 719 Second Avenue, Sul e 1150 Seattle, WA 98104 206) 623-9372 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) 1 approval and the approval of the final engineering and design plans exceeded the a erage 2 timeline for obtaining approvals for a project of this type and scale. 3 7. For example, although the Wilson Park 1 and 2 sites are within the lity of 4 Renton water service area, the City granted permission to Soos Creek Water and '.ewer 5 District to be the water purveyor for the sites. This process took an additional two onths 6 7 of negotiations between the Wilsons,the City,and the District,and the District had to .pply g for and obtain approval for the expanded service area. 9 8. Additionally, the Wilson Park 2 site had an overlay and different .•ping 10 designations on various portions of the site. We spent considerable time working wi h the 11 City to determine how to handle the split zoning issues and what process the City "ould 12 use, which led to the need to apply for a PUD in addition to the preliminary plat. Wh le the 13 14 end result was productive, the process extended the timeline for obtaining approvals. 15 9. The City also wished to condition approval for Wilson Park 2 upon 16 providing pedestrian linkage to the nearest Renton School District bus stop. The con ition 17 was unusual given the project's size(10 lots) and the confusing layout of school bus r utes. 18 The project is close to the boundary between the Renton and Kent School District., and 19 both districts had school buses operating in the area. Determining the actual locations of 20 the routes and stops for the two districts, and detelniining the City's requirements .r the 21 22 walkway,required multiple conversations. We then needed to bring in a surveyor to p •vide 23 additional topographical information for the pedestrian walkway design. This process alone 24 25 DECLARATION OF DARRELL OFFS-3 Van Ness Feldman 719 Second Avenue, Sui e 1150 Seattle, WA 98194 206) 623-9372 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) 1 took four months from the time we began working to meet the condition to the topogi aphic 2 survey. 3 10. After we received the preliminary plat/PUD approval and the engina ering 4 plans were ready for review, additional delays occurred. The plans were reviewed nder 5 the direction of three different supervisors. One of the supervisors refused to provid. final 6 7 approval based on the location of the stormwater vault. The vault's location had been •hown 8 on the preliminary plat application and on every set of plans we had submitted to th• City. 9 so the refusal to approve came as a surprise. After the Stormwater Utility Dep. ment 10 approved the location, the supervisor conceded and gave verbal approval, but the p ocess I1 of attempting to negotiate took considerable time. Further,the supervisor required that three 12 access ports be provided on the vault.although the Code only required two access po s s. In 13 14 this case, we revised the plans to accommodate the supervisor's requirement. This p ocess 15 of working with the City on these matters consumed an additional six weeks, beyor d the 16 normal time period for review and approval of the final plans. 17 11. Despite the challenges this project has faced, I believe that if the extension 1 is granted, the project will be ready for final plat approval in time. 19 I declare under the penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washingt. that 20 the foregoing is true and correct. 21 23 24 25 DECLARATION OF DARRELL OFFE-4 Van Ness Feldman 719 Second Avenue, Sul e 1150 Seattle, WA 98104 206) 623-9372 Ii AGENDA ITEM #7. b) 1 2 i A I V r arrell Offe, Decl 7/7 4 5 6 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 77 24 25 DECLARATION OF DARRELL OFFE-5 Van Ness Feldman „, 719 Second Avenue, Suite 1150 Seattle, WA 98104 206) 623-9372 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) kacAktie`tf 1J. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR THE CITY OF RENTON 9 RE: 10 Wilson Park 1 FINAL DECISION 11 Request for Extension of Plat Expiration 12 13 14 Robert and Doravin Wilson have requested extension of the August 16, 2018 preliminary 15 plat approval expiration date for the Wilson Park 1 subdivision to July 5, 2019. The request is denied. However, preliminary plat expiration is extended to November 16, 2018 to account for the 16 uncertainties attributable to the decision-making process in addressing this extension request. The Wilsons first submitted their request for extension by letter dated May 3, 2018. The 17 City filed a response dated May 22, 2018 in which the City requested denial of the extension 18 request. The Wilsons submitted a reply dated June 7, 2018. Requests to extend the expiration of preliminary plat approvals are governed by RMC 4-7- 19 080(L)(2), which authorizes extensions by the hearing examiner to approve up to one year extensions "...if the applicant can show need caused by unusual circumstances or situations which 20 make it unduly burdensome to file the final plat..." The standard five year expiration period was extended by the state legislature an additional two years in recognition of the Great Recession that occurred in 2008. The Wilsons have also already acquired an administratively approved one-year 22 extension authorized by RMC 4-7-080(L)(1). The currently proposed extension would extend the expiration period from eight years to nine years. Wilson Park 1 acquired preliminary plat approval 23 in August, 2010. 24 The Wilsons raise some good unusual circumstances that occurred in the first few years of the proposal. Most notably, access to Wilson Park 1 was across adjoining property that went into 25 foreclosure. To maintain their access rights, the Wilsons ultimately purchased the adjoining property and then developed it into a second subdivision, Wilson Park 2. In addition to delays 26 PLAT EXTENSION REQUEST - 1 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) 1 caused by the foreclosure, additional delay can be attributable to coordinating development between 2 Wilson Park 1 and 2. The foreclosure and coordinated development issues certainly qualify as unusual 3 circumstances, but the record does not establish a need to go beyond the additional time created by the state legislative expansion of the expiration period from five to seven years and the additional 4 one-year extension already approved. The timeline in the Wilson's May 3, 2018 request for extension shows that most of the problems caused by the foreclosure and need to coordinate 5 development were resolved by December, 2014, by which time final engineering design had been 6 approved by both the City of Renton and Soos Creek Water District. Beyond December, 2014, there isn't much in the record to explain why it's taken an additional three and a half years for the 7 Wilsons to acquire final plat approval. Some declarations in the Wilson reply identify undated issues regarding stormwater design, but these do not appear significant enough to justify another 3.58yearsofdelay. The additional two years granted by the legislature was intended to address delays 9 created by the Great Recession, which likely encompasses the problems the Wilsons incurred due to the foreclosure of the adjoining property. Problems in marketing the property are not a sufficient - 10 justification for further extension, since the Wilsons always had the alternative to develop the property as required for final plat approval, notwithstanding any financial obstacles to this objective. 11 In assessing whether the obstacles faced by the Wilsons makes it "unduly burdensome" to 12 meet final plat deadlines, it is appropriate to consider the public detriment in authorizing the extension. In their May 22, 2018 response the City identified numerous code revisions that have 13 occurred since Wilson Park 1 was approved, including amendments to retaining wall standards that was a matter of considerable public concern in part due to the Wilson subdivisions. Given these 14 public impacts, it is not considered unduly burdensome to the Wilsons to deny the request. It is recognized that the Wilsons development plans may have been put on hold to a certain15 extent as they waited for a decision on their extension request. To mitigate against this impact to 16 the Wilsons, the Wilson Park 1 preliminary plat expiration is extended to November 16, 2018. 17 18 DATED this 27th day of June, 2018. 19 r a. 20 Nlttir_1. ()11„„tts 21 City of Renton Hearing Examiner 22 23 24 Appeal Right and Valuation Notices 25 The RMC does not identify whether a hearing examiner decision on plat expiration requests is appealable to the City Council. If the Wilsons wish to appeal, they should consult with their 26 attorney and the City's Planning Department to ascertain their appeal rights. In the absence of PLAT EXTENSION REQUEST -2 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) r 1 clear appeal rights, a common strategy is to appeal both administratively (in this case the City 2 Council) and judicially (under the Land Use Petition Act, Chapter 36.70C RCW). City Council appeals must be filed within 14 days of the issuance of this decision and judicial appeals must be 3 filed within 21 days of the issuance of this decision. A request for reconsideration to the hearing examiner may also be filed as outlined in RMC 4-8-100(I). 4 Affected property owners may request a change in valuation for property tax purposes5 notwithstanding any program of revaluation. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 PLAT EXTENSION REQUEST -3 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) 0 A?7 c j_ A e p E .. CITY OF RENTON JUL 02 2018 1 RECEIVED CITY CLERK'S OFFICE 2 3 4 5 6 7 BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER OF THE CITY OF RENTON 8 9 RE: Wilson Park I City of Renton's Limited Motion for Reconsideration i0 Request for Extension of Plat Expiration 11 12 13 14 The City of Renton (the "City") respectfully submits this limited motion for 15 reconsideration of the Hearing Examiner's June 27, 2018 Final Decision (the "Decision") on the Wilson Park I subdivision's request for extension of preliminary plat expiration.16 Scope of Motion 17 The City agrees with the Decision's analysis supporting the denial of the request to 18 extend the Wilson Park I expiration date. In this limited motion for reconsideration,the City 19 challenges only the Decision's grant of a three-month plat extension (to November 16, 2018) 20 that the Decision made "to account for the uncertainties attributable to the decision-making 21 process in addressing this extension request." Decision at 1:15-16. For the reasons discussed 22 below,the City respectfully requests that the Hearing Examiner reconsider the Decision and 23 issue a modified decision that (1) denies the extension request in full and (2) retains the August 24 16, 2018 preliminary plat approval expiration date for Wilson Park I. 25 Wilson Park I Renton City Attorney City's Motion for Reconsideration-1 1055 South Grady Way 74 % Renton,WA 98057 Phone: 425.430.6480 Fax: 425.430.6498 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) 1 Discussion 2 The Renton Municipal Code ("RMC") provides that the Hearing Examiner may only grant 3 additional plat extensions if the requestor satisfies strict criteria. Specifically, the requestor 4 must show that "unusual circumstances or situations" caused it to be "unduly burdensome"to 5 proceed without an additional extension. RMC 4-7-080.L.2. These criteria apply to any and 6 every additional extension, including the three-month extension given in the Decision here. However, here,the Decision's analysis explains that the requestors (the Wilsons) did not satisfy7 the applicable code criteria. In other words,the Decision itself does not support its own three- 8 month extension and is,thus, in conflict with RMC 4-7-080.L.2. 9 Nor could the Wilsons reasonably argue now that the Decision's three-month extension 10 satisfies RMC 4-7-080.L.2's criteria for showings of"unusual circumstances or situations" and 11 undue burden." First,there was no undue delay or burden in the processing of the Wilsons' 12 request for extension. They submitted their request on May 3, 2018, and the Decision issued 13 on June 27, 2018, SO days before the plat expiration date of August 16, 2018. Meanwhile,the 14 code allows a requestor to wait until just 30 days before plat expiration to even submit a 15 request for an additional extension. RMC 4-7-080.L.W (request for additional extension must 16 "be filed at least thirty(30) days prior to the plat expiration date"). Here,the decision on the 17 Wilsons' request was issued 5O days before plat expiration. The Wilsons received the Decision 18 20 days before they were even required to submit their request. There was no "unusual 19 circumstance or situation"causing "undue burden." 20 Next,there was no evidence before the Hearing Examiner that the Wilsons suspended 21 their plat-related activities after submitting their request for the additional plat extension, 22 which the Decision's three-month extension appears to assume. In fact, the City's Community Economic Development department ("CED") recently received inquiries from potential23 buyers of the plat, suggesting that marketing of the plat continued. Even if the Wilsons had 24 25 Wilson Park I Renton City Attorney City's Motion for Reconsideration-2 f 1055 South Grady Way i!c. Renton,WA 98057 Phone: 425.430.6480 Fax: 425.430.6498 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) 1 suspended their plat-related activities while waiting for the Decision, such suspension would 2 not have been reasonable. Nothing in the code authorizes a "tolling" of the expiration date g pending the outcome of a request for plat extension. Without such a provision, in CED's 4 experience, it is routine that a plat's interested parties (i.e., both applicants and the local 5 government) rely on the specified plat expiration date unless and until that date is actually 6 extended. Finally, the unsupported three-month extension could allow the very consequences that7 compelled the City to urge denial of the extension request in the first place. For example within8 the three-month period, extensive site clearing and mass grading could commence resulting in9 tree removal, as well as construction of retaining walls, all of which would not be permitted 10 under current code. 11 In sum, because the Decision's three-month extension violates the criteria of RMC 4-7- 12 080.L.2 and could have significant negative consequences to the City,the City respectfully 13 requests that the Hearing Examiner issue a modified decision that (1) denies the extension 14 request in full and (2) retains the August 16, 2018 preliminary plat approval expiration date for 15 Wilson Park I.1 Mf 16 Respectfully submitted this 4,— day of July, 2018. 17 18 e , C. E. "Chip"Vincent 19 Administrator Community& Economic Department 20 City of Renton 21 22 23 ' Even if the Hearing Examiner disagrees with the City's analysis and denies this limited motion for 24 reconsideration,the City urges the Hearing Examiner to not add additional time to the plat expiration as a consequence of the time taken to decide this motion. 25 Wilson Park I Renton City Attorney City's Motion for Reconsideration 3 1055 South Grady Way ION Renton,WA 98057 Phone: 425.430.6480 Fax: 425.430.6498 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) 4t id e f F July 9, 2018 VIA EMAIL Mr. Phil Olbrechts Renton Hearing Examiner 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 Ref: Wilsons' Response to City of Renton's Limited Motion for Reconsideration of Examiner's Decision on Request for Extension (Wilson Park 1, LUA 09-140) Dear Sir: We are writing to oppose the City of Renton's Limited Motion for Reconsideration, filed July 3, 2018. Although we believe the record supported granting our request for an extension to July 5, 2019 in full,the Examiner's Final Decision(which essentially preserved the original plat approval period and extended the plat approval only as needed to mitigate for the time spent on our extension request) was not an improper abuse of discretion, was supported by the record, and should not be reconsidered as the City requests. As the Examiner found, we faced"uncertainties" and put our plans "on hold to a certain extent as we] waited for a decision" on our extension request.' The extension, if granted, would have lowered the risks associated with construction and obtaining final plat approval and would have increased the property value. Thus, no buyers were willing to close or settle on a purchase price until we knew whether we had an extension. Further, although we considered our options if the extension were denied, we did not want to give up the value of the entitlements or rush to begin construction ourselves, in case the extension was later granted. In short, both we and potential buyers remained in limbo and unable to act until we knew the plat's expiration date. At heart,the City's arguments fault us for being proactive and putting good faith effort into the plat and our request. The City argues that the Code allows a requestor to submit an extension request up to 30 days before plat expiration, and the fact that we received the Final Decision before the Code's submission deadline means we cannot show any burden from the decision- making process. But the Code's 30-day submission deadline is a deadline, not a recommended or wise practice. The City should not be punishing requestors who submit their extension request before the deadline, precluding that party from claiming any burdens suffered during the decision-making process. The City also argues we suffered no burden because the City received recent inquiries from potential buyers of the plat, suggesting that marketing continued. But as discussed above, buyers were unwilling to close until the plat's expiration date was decided, and the uncertainties surrounding the plat's expiration date burdened our efforts. Again,the City should not be punishing parties for exerting good faith(though impaired and unsuccessful) efforts to work toward final plat approval while an extension request is pending. 1 Final Decision at p. 1,lines 15-16;p.2, lines 15-16. AGENDA ITEM #7. b) Finally, the City suggests the Examiner should reconsider the Final Decision because there is a chance we may construct the improvements necessary to obtain final plat approval. The City's argument is absurd. The City granted preliminary plat approval for Wilson Park 1; that approval remains valid and has not yet expired; and we are undisputedly entitled to construct and work toward final plat approval. The Examiner's limited extension to November 16, 2018 only preserved our plat approval and maintained the status quo, extending the approval only as needed to mitigate for the time spent on our extension request. On the other hand, the City's Motion for Reconsideration effectively cuts into our plat approval period. First, if granted,the City's Motion would deprive us of the time during which we were unable to move forward while awaiting a decision on our extension request and the City's Motion. Second, even if the Motion is denied,the time taken to resolve the Motion re-raises the uncertainty surrounding the expiration date and burdens our ability to move forward. We therefore request additional time to mitigate for the time spent resolving the City's Motion. In conclusion, the City's Motion is troubling, particularly its suggestion that potential construction and final plat approval is cause for concern and grounds for revising the Final Decision. The Motion demonstrates that the City's focus is not on our unusual circumstances or burdens, but rather on stopping this project. Although the City has revised its development regulations, the undisputed fact is that Wilson Park l's approval is valid, approved, and vested to the prior regulations. Moreover, no City employee has ever raised concerns to us about the safety or soundness of Wilson Park 1 or 2's design. The City's desire to impose its revised regulations on Wilson Park 1 is not grounds for cutting the plat approval period short or arguing that construction should not commence. Therefore, we respectfully request that you deny the City's Motion and grant additional time to mitigate for the time spent resolving the City's Motion. Additionally, in the spirit of reconsideration and in light of the positions and motives expressed in the City's Motion, we respectfully request that you reconsider your decision to deny our original extension request, and grant our request to extend the plat approval expiration date to July 5, 2019 to coincide with the expiration of Wilson Park 2. Please let us know if you require any additional information, and thank you for your consideration. Thank you, Robert and Doravin Wilson 7 ' AGENDA ITEM #7. b) CITY OF RENTON JUL111zone M RECEIVED ' 2 CITY CLERK'S OFFICE 3 4 5 6 7 BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER OF THE CITY OF RENTON 8 9 RE: Wilson Park I City of Renton's Reply in Support of Its Limited Motion for Reconsideration 10 Request for Extension of Plat Expiration 11 12 13 14 Introduction 15 This Reply responds to the Wilsons'July 9, 2018 response (the "Response") as to whether the Hearing Examiner's unsolicited three-month plat extension should be reconsidered16 and set aside. As explained in this Reply, the Response.does not successfully refute any issue17 raised by the City, and the City's Limited Motion for Reconsideration (the "Motion") of the18 Hearing Examiner's June 27, 2018 Final Decision (the "Decision") should be granted.19 Discussion 20 First,the Response asserts that the Hearing Examiner"found"that the Wilsons faced 21 final platting interruptions while they awaited the Decision. Response, p. 1, para. 2. ("As the 22 Examiner found...") (citing the Hearing Examiner's decision, not the record before the Hearing 23 Examiner). The Hearing Examiner did not make any such finding; rather, the Decision 24 postulates that the Wilsons might have paused their efforts. Decision at 2:14-16 ("It is 25 recognized that the Wilsons development plans may have been put on hold to a certain extent Wilson Park I City's Reply in Support of Its Motion for Reconsideration-1 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) 1 as they waited for a decision on their extension request"). As the City explained in its Motion, 2 such postulation conflicts with the extension standards of RMC 4-7-080.L for two reasons. One, 3 the burden is on the applicant to make an adequate showing of need; here,the Wilsons did not 4 introduce any evidence regarding their actions pending the Decision. In fact,the Decision 5 rejected as inadequate the only evidence that the Wilsons submitted,finding that the evidence showed that all of the significant platting obstacles had been resolved by December 2014 and6 failed to account for why plat work was not completed in the ensuing 3'/years. Decision at 7 2:4-7. Two,the City explained in its Motion that even if the Wilsons had submitted evidence of 8 delayed platting efforts while awaiting the Decision, any such delay was not reasonable and did 9 not warrant the Decision's unsolicited three-month extension. Now, in their Response, the 10 Wilsons assert for the first time that they were delayed by the pending Decision;the Hearing 11 Examiner should reject these newly-made assertions. 12 The Wilsons assert that buyers would not close on the property while the 13 extension request was pending. Response at p. 1, para. 2. City's response: The 14 pending decision on an extension request did not deter buyers; it was far more 15 likely the remaining, underlying plat termination date of August 16, 2018 that 16 was deterring buyers. The pending extension request did not jeopardize the 17 Wilsons' position. 18 The Wilsons assert that they did not "want to give up the value of the 19 entitlements or rush to begin construction ourselves." Response at p. 1, para. 2. 20 City's response: These were business judgments that the Wilsons made when 21 they chose to assume the risk that the status quo(the plat expiration date) 22 would shift. Such risk calls do not meet the RMC 4-7-080.L showings for "undue burden" and "unusual circumstances or situations." 23 Next,the Response complains that the Motion "fault[s the Wilsons] for being proactive" 24 by filing their extension request before the deadline to do so. Response at p. 1, para. 3. To the 25 contrary, the Motion laid out the extension request's timeline to explain that (1)the Decision's Wilson Park I City's Reply in Support of Its Motion for Reconsideration-2 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) 1 timing did not reflect any inappropriate delay and (2) because the Renton Municipal Code 2 allows an applicant to file an extension request until just 30 days before plat expiration, it 3 clearly contemplates that decisions to deny will issue so close to plat expiration dates that 4 applicants must continue to act diligently. The Wilsons are not somehow less entitled to delay their platting efforts because they filed their extension request early; rather, no applicant— whether submitting a request early or on the 30-day deadline itself—is entitled to delay at all6 its platting efforts while its extension request is pending.7 Third, the Response characterizes as "absurd" and "troubling"the City's opposition to8 the three-month extension on the grounds that the extension could allow the plat construction 9 to occur. Response, p. 2, paras. 1 and 3. The City's position is reasonable and grounded in its 10 code and in sound public policy. Due to its prior plat extension, the Wilson Park t preliminary 11 plat had an eight year approval period in which construction could have been commenced and 12 completed. Meanwhile,as the City explained in its May 22, 2018 request to the Hearing 13 Examiner,there have been a myriad of code changes that have occurred since Wilson Park I's 14 approval. As just one example, concerns raised by the public about the retaining walls for this 15 very project resulted in the City amending its retaining wall height regulations. Thus, because 16 the Wilson Park I construction remains unfinished at the end of its eight-year approval period, 17 the City's interest now is in preventing the unjustified tacking on of additional time that would 18 facilitate building out a plat that is materially and detrimentally nonconforming to the City's 19 development regulations. 20 Finally,the Hearing Examiner should deny the Response's two concluding requests for 21 (1) additional time to account for the pendency of the City's Limited Motion for 22 Reconsideration and (2)full reconsideration of the Decision. As to the former,the Wilsons 23 cannot reasonably have interrupted their platting activities because of the pending Motion for all of the same reasons raised in the Motion itself, and no further extension is merited under 24 RMC 4-7-080.1. As to the latter,the City incorporates by reference its prior arguments: The 25 Decision correctly found that no extension was warranted under RMC 4-7-080.L;the only error Wilson Park I City's Reply in Support of Its Motion for Reconsideration-3 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) 1 in the Decision was that it proceeded to grant a three-month extension despite its findings. 2 Respectfully submitted this 11th day of July, 2018. 3 4 C. E. "Chip" Vincent 5 Administrator Community& Economic Development 6 City of Renton 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Wilson Park I City's Reply in Support of Its Motion for Reconsideration-4 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) t / ace4 /-I 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR THE CITY OF RENTON 9 10 RE: Wilson Park 1 FINAL DECISION UPON 11 Request for Extension of Plat RECONSIDERATION Expiration 12 13 14 The City's motion for reconsideration is granted and the final decision on the Wilson's 15 request for extension of plat alteration is modified to remove the three month extension authorized in the Examiner's June 27, 2018 final decision on the extension request. The Wilson's plat shall 16 expire on August 16,2018. As background, the Wilson's filed a request on May 3, 2018 to extend the expiration period 17 of the Wilson Park I subdivision. At the time of the request,the Wilson Park I subdivision was due 18 to expire on August 16, 2018 and the Wilsons requested extension of the expiration to July 5, 2019. By decision dated June 27, 2018 the Examiner found no unusual circumstances to justify the 19 requested extension, but agreed to extend expiration for an additional three months to November 16, 2018 in order to mitigate against any delays caused by the decision making process on the Wilson's 20 May 3, 2018 request to extend expiration. The City requested reconsideration of the three month extension on July 2, 2018. The Wilsons responded to the request on July 9, 2018 and the City replied on July 11, 2018. 22 The Examiner's authorization of a three-month extension was largely based upon presumed consent from the City and Wilsons that the extension would constitute a reasonable means of 23 mitigating any delay prejudice the Wilsons may have encountered during the pendency of the Wilson's extension request. However, the Examiner erred in his presumption that the City would 24 find such an extension reasonable. The City's position is harsh but fair, as the Wilsons have 25 essentially benefitted from an arguable gap in the City's development standards that enabled them to acquire approval of retaining walls at a height that was not compatible with community aesthetics. 26 The three month extension also would enable the Wilsons to construct their development to PLAT EXTENSION REQUEST - 1 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) I numerous other development standards that are outdated by several years as well. The uncertainties that underly the time in waiting for a plat extension decision certainly can cause additional delays in2 the construction and planning of a project, but there was nothing unusual about the delays in this 3 extension request that would distinguish the request from any other. The reconsideration process added a little further delay, but the delay overall was minimal as a reconsideration decision was 4 expeditiously issued by the Examiner. Approval of a three month extension solely because of the extension request review process under these circumstances would set a precedent for automatic 5 three month expansion of all extension requests, which was not contemplated in the City's code'. 6 DATED this 15th day of July, 2018. 7 8 r . Pa N.. ()itilvehK 9 City of Renton Hearing Examiner 10 11 12 Appeal Right and Valuation Notices 13 The RMC does not identify whether a hearing examiner decision on plat expiration requests is appealable to the City Council. If the Wilsons wish to appeal, they should consult with their 14 attorney and the City's Planning Department to ascertain their appeal rights. In the absence of 15 clear appeal rights, a common strategy is to appeal both administratively (in this case the City Council) and judicially (under the Land Use Petition Act, Chapter 36.70C RCW). City Council 16 appeals must be filed within 14 days of the issuance of this decision and judicial appeals must be filed within 21 days of the issuance of this decision. A request for reconsideration to the hearing 17 examiner may also be filed as outlined in RMC 4-8-100(I). 18 Affected property owners may request a change in valuation for property tax purposes 19 notwithstanding any program of revaluation. 20 21 22 23 24 25 ' It is also noteworthy that as far as the Examiner can recall,he hasn't been presented with any other plat extension request in the seven years he has served as Renton's examiner. Consequently, the Wilsons are not being treated 26 differently by the Examiner from any other applicant that has requested an extension request. PLAT EXTENSION REQUEST -2 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 PLAT EXTENSION REQUEST - 1 BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR THE CITY OF RENTON RE: Wilson Park 1 Request for Extension of Plat Expiration ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) FINAL DECISION UPON RECONSIDERATION The City’s motion for reconsideration is granted and the final decision on the Wilson’s request for extension of plat alteration is modified to remove the three month extension authorized in the Examiner’s June 27, 2018 final decision on the extension request. The Wilson’s plat shall expire on August 16, 2018. As background, the Wilson’s filed a request on May 3, 2018 to extend the expiration period of the Wilson Park I subdivision. At the time of the request, the Wilson Park I subdivision was due to expire on August 16, 2018 and the Wilsons requested extension of the expiration to July 5, 2019. By decision dated June 27, 2018 the Examiner found no unusual circumstances to justify the requested extension, but agreed to extend expiration for an additional three months to November 16, 2018 in order to mitigate against any delays caused by the decision making process on the Wilson’s May 3, 2018 request to extend expiration. The City requested reconsideration of the three month extension on July 2, 2018. The Wilsons responded to the request on July 9, 2018 and the City replied on July 11, 2018. The Examiner’s authorization of a three-month extension was largely based upon presumed consent from the City and Wilsons that the extension would constitute a reasonable means of mitigating any delay prejudice the Wilsons may have encountered during the pendency of the Wilson’s extension request. However, the Examiner erred in his presumption that the City would find such an extension reasonable. The City’s position is harsh but fair, as the Wilsons have essentially benefitted from an arguable gap in the City’s development standards that enabled them to acquire approval of retaining walls at a height that was not compatible with community aesthetics. The three month extension also would enable the Wilsons to construct their development to AGENDA ITEM #7. b) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 PLAT EXTENSION REQUEST - 2 numerous other development standards that are outdated by several years as well. The uncertainties that underly the time in waiting for a plat extension decision certainly can cause additional delays in the construction and planning of a project, but there was nothing unusual about the delays in this extension request that would distinguish the request from any other. The reconsideration process added a little further delay, but the delay overall was minimal as a reconsideration decision was expeditiously issued by the Examiner. Approval of a three month extension solely because of the extension request review process under these circumstances would set a precedent for automatic three month expansion of all extension requests, which was not contemplated in the City’s code1. DATED this 15th day of July, 2018. City of Renton Hearing Examiner Appeal Right and Valuation Notices The RMC does not identify whether a hearing examiner decision on plat expiration requests is appealable to the City Council. If the Wilsons wish to appeal, they should consult with their attorney and the City’s Planning Department to ascertain their appeal rights. In the absence of clear appeal rights, a common strategy is to appeal both administratively (in this case the City Council) and judicially (under the Land Use Petition Act, Chapter 36.70C RCW). City Council appeals must be filed within 14 days of the issuance of this decision and judicial appeals must be filed within 21 days of the issuance of this decision. A request for reconsideration to the hearing examiner may also be filed as outlined in RMC 4-8-100(I). Affected property owners may request a change in valuation for property tax purposes notwithstanding any program of revaluation. 1 It is also noteworthy that as far as the Examiner can recall, he hasn’t been presented with any other plat extension request in the seven years he has served as Renton’s examiner. Consequently, the Wilsons are not being treated differently by the Examiner from any other applicant that has requested an extension request. AGENDA ITEM #7. b) CIN OF RENTON JUL 112018 (IN 1 RECEIVED CITY CLERK'S OFFICE2 3 4 5 6 7 BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER OF THE CITY OF RENTON 8 9 RE: Wilson Park I City of Renton's Reply in Support of Its Limited Motion for Reconsideration 10 Request for Extension of Plat Expiration 11 12 13 14 Introduction 15 This Reply responds to the Wilsons'July 9, 2018 response (the "Response") as to whether the Hearing Examiner's unsolicited three-month plat extension should be reconsidered16 and set aside. As explained in this Reply, the Responsedoes not successfully refute any issue17 raised by the City, and the City's Limited Motion for Reconsideration (the "Motion") of the 18 Hearing Examiner's June 27, 2018 Final Decision (the "Decision") should be granted. 19 Discussion 20 First, the Response asserts that the Hearing Examiner "found" that the Wilsons faced 21 final platting interruptions while they awaited the Decision. Response, p. 1, para. 2. ("As the 22 Examiner found...") (citing the Hearing Examiner's decision, not the record before the Hearing 23 Examiner). The Hearing Examiner did not make any such finding; rather, the Decision 24 postulates that the Wilsons might have paused their efforts. Decision at 2:14-16 ("It is 25 recognized that the Wilsons development plans may have been put on hold to a certain extent Wilson Park I City's Reply in Support of Its Motion for Reconsideration-1 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) 1 as they waited for a decision on their extension request"). As the City explained in its Motion, 2 such postulation conflicts with the extension standards of RMC 4-7-080.L for two reasons. One, 3 the burden is on the applicant to make an adequate showing of need; here, the Wilsons did not 4 introduce any evidence regarding their actions pending the Decision. In fact, the Decision 5 rejected as inadequate the only evidence that the Wilsons submitted, finding that the evidence showed that all of the significant platting obstacles had been resolved by December 2014 and6 failed to account for why plat work was not completed in the ensuing 31/ 2 years. Decision at 7 2:4-7. Two, the City explained in its Motion that even if the Wilsons had submitted evidence of 8 delayed platting efforts while awaiting the Decision, any such delay was not reasonable and did 9 not warrant the Decision's unsolicited three-month extension. Now, in their Response, the 10 Wilsons assert for the first time that they were delayed by the pending Decision; the Hearing 11 Examiner should reject these newly-made assertions. 12 The Wilsons assert that buyers would not close on the property while the 13 extension request was pending. Response at p. 1, para. 2. City's response: The 14 pending decision on an extension request did not deter buyers; it was far more 15 likely the remaining, underlying plat termination date of August 16, 2018 that 16 was deterring buyers. The pending extension request did not jeopardize the 17 Wilsons' position. 18 The Wilsons assert that they did not "want to give up the value of the 19 entitlements or rush to begin construction ourselves." Response at p. 1, para. 2. 20 City's response: These were business judgments that the Wilsons made when 21 they chose to assume the risk that the status quo (the plat expiration date) 22 would shift. Such risk calls do not meet the RMC 4-7-080.L showings for "undue burden" and "unusual circumstances or situations." 23 Next, the Response complains that the Motion "fault[s the Wilsons] for being proactive" 24 by filing their extension request before the deadline to do so. Response at p. 1, para. 3. To the 25 contrary, the Motion laid out the extension request's timeline to explain that (1) the Decision's Wilson Park City's Reply in Support of Its Motion for Reconsideration-2 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) 1 timing did not reflect any inappropriate delay and (2) because the Renton Municipal Code 2 allows an applicant to file an extension request until just 30 days before plat expiration, it 3 clearly contemplates that decisions to deny will issue so close to plat expiration dates that 4 applicants must continue to act diligently. The Wilsons are not somehow less entitled to delay 5 their platting efforts because they filed their extension request early; rather, no applicant— whether submitting a request early or on the 30-day deadline itself—is entitled to delay at all6 its platting efforts while its extension request is pending. 7 Third, the Response characterizes as "absurd" and "troubling" the City's opposition to 8 the three-month extension on the grounds that the extension could allow the plat construction 9 to occur. Response, p. 2, paras. 1 and 3. The City's position is reasonable and grounded in its 10 code and in sound public policy. Due to its prior plat extension, the Wilson Park I preliminary 11 plat had an eight year approval period in which construction could have been commenced and 12 completed. Meanwhile, as the City explained in its May 22, 2018 request to the Hearing 13 Examiner, there have been a myriad of code changes that have occurred since Wilson Park l's 14 approval. As just one example, concerns raised by the public about the retaining walls for this 15 very project resulted in the City amending its retaining wall height regulations. Thus, because 16 the Wilson Park I construction remains unfinished at the end of its eight-year approval period, 17 the City's interest now is in preventing the unjustified tacking on of additional time that would 18 facilitate building out a plat that is materially and detrimentally nonconforming to the City's 19 development regulations. 20 Finally, the Hearing Examiner should deny the Response's two concluding requests for 21 (1) additional time to account for the pendency of the City's Limited Motion for 22 Reconsideration and (2)full reconsideration of the Decision. As to the former, the Wilsons cannot reasonably have interrupted their platting activities because of the pending Motion for23 all of the same reasons raised in the Motion itself, and no further extension is merited under 24 RMC 4-7-080.L. As to the latter, the City incorporates by reference its prior arguments: The 25 Decision correctly found that no extension was warranted under RMC 4-7-080.L; the only error Wilson Park I City's Reply in Support of Its Motion for Reconsideration-3 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) 1 in the Decision was that it proceeded to grant a three-month extension despite its findings. 2 Respectfully submitted this 11th day of July, 2018. 3 4 C. E. "Chip" Vincent Administrator 5 Community & Economic Development 6 City of Renton 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Wilson Park City's Reply in Support of Its Motion for Reconsideration-4 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) July 9,2018 VIA EMAIL Mr.Phil Olbrechts Renton Hearing Examiner 1055 S.Grady Way Renton,WA 98057 Ref:Wilsons’Response to City of Renton’s Limited Motion for Reconsideration of Examiner’s Decision on Request for Extension (Wilson Park 1,LUA 09-140) Dear Sir: We are writing to oppose the City of Renton’s Limited Motion for Reconsideration,?led July 3, 2018.Although we believe the record supported granting our request for an extension to July 5, 2019 in full,the Examiner’s Final Decision (which essentially preserved the original plat approval period and extended the plat approval only as needed to mitigate for the time spent on our extension request)was not an improper abuse of discretion,was supported by the record,and should not be reconsidered as the City requests. As the Examiner found,we faced “uncertainties”and put our plans “on hold to a certain extent as [we]waited for a decision”on our extension request.‘The extension,if granted,would have lowered the risks associated with construction and obtaining final plat approval and would have increased the property value.Thus,no buyers were willing to close or settle on a purchase price until we knew whether we had an extension.Further,although we considered our options if the extension were denied,we did not want to give up the value of the entitlements or rush to begin construction ourselves,in case the extension was later granted.In short,both we and potential buyers remained in limbo and unable to act until we knew the plat’s expiration date. At heart,the City’s arguments fault us for being proactive and putting good faith effort into the plat and our request.The City argues that the Code allows a requestor to submit an extension request up to 30 days before plat expiration,and the fact that we received the Final Decision before the Code’s submission deadline means we cannot show any burden from the decision- making process.But the Code’s 30-day submission deadline is a deadline,not a recommended or wise practice.The City should not be punishing requestors who submit their extension request before the deadline,precluding that party from claiming any burdens suffered during the decision—makingprocess. The City also argues we suffered no burden because the City received recent inquiries from potential buyers of the plat,suggesting that marketing continued.But as discussed above,buyers were unwilling to close until the p1at’s expiration date was decided,and the uncertainties surrounding the plat’s expiration date burdened our efforts.Again,the City should not be punishing parties for exerting good faith (though impaired and unsuccessful)efforts to work toward ?nal plat approval while an extension request is pending. ‘Final Decision atp.1,lines 15-16;p.2,lines 15-16. AGENDA ITEM #7. b) Finally,the City suggests the Examiner should reconsider the Final Decision because there is a chance we may construct the improvements necessary to obtain ?nal plat approval.The City’s argument is absurd.The City granted preliminary plat approval for Wilson Park 1;that approval remains valid and has not yet expired;and we are undisputedly entitled to construct and work toward ?nal plat approval.The Examiner’s limited extension to November 16,2018 only preserved our plat approval and maintained the status quo,extending the approval only as needed to mitigate for the time spent on our extension request. On the other hand,the City’s Motion for Reconsideration effectively cuts into our plat approval period.First,if granted,the City’s Motion would deprive us of the time during which we were unable to move forward while awaiting a decision on our extension request and the City’s Motion.Second,even if the Motion is denied,the time taken to resolve the Motion re-raises the uncertainty surrounding the expiration date and burdens our ability to move forward.We therefore request additional time to mitigate for the time spent resolving the City’s Motion. In conclusion,the City’s Motion is troubling,particularly its suggestion that potential construction and ?nal plat approval is cause for concern and grounds for revising the Final Decision.The Motion demonstrates that the City’s focus is not on our unusual circumstances or burdens.but rather on stopping this project.Although the City has revised its development regulations,the undisputed fact is that Wilson Park l’s approval is valid,approved,and vested to the prior regulations.Moreover,no City employee has ever raised concerns to us about the safety or soundness of Wilson Park 1 or 2’s design.The City’s desire to impose its revised regulations on Wilson Park 1 is not grounds for cutting the plat approval period short or arguing that construction should not commence. Therefore,we respectfully request that you deny the City’s Motion and grant additional time to mitigate for the time spent resolving the City’s Motion.Additionally,in the spirit of reconsideration and in light of the positions and motives expressed in the City’s Motion,we respectfully request that you reconsider your decision to deny our original extension request,and grant our request to extend the plat approval expiration date to July 5,2019 to coincide with the expiration of Wilson Park 2. Please let us know if you require any additional information,and thank you for your consideration. Thank you, Robert and Doravin Wilson //V/a‘Z:m .’/./(Li/,(/€_{a//,»5/L/ AGENDA ITEM #7. b) 1 Cynthia Moya From:Phil Olbrechts <olbrechtslaw@gmail.com> Sent:Monday, July 02, 2018 5:23 PM To:Cynthia Moya; doravin@comcast.net; Cc: 'Jay Derr'; Clara Park; Steve Beck; Offe Engineers; Jason Seth; Chip Vincent Subject:Re: Wilson Park Reconsideration Request Parties, My understanding is that the Wilsons have received a copy of the City's reconsideration request. The Wilson will have until 5:00 pm 7/9/18 to respond and the City may submit a reply by 7/11/18 at 5:00 pm. The response and reply should be emailed to the parties of this email. On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 5:13 PM, Cynthia Moya <CMoya@rentonwa.gov> wrote: Thank you, Cindy Moya, City Clerk Specialist City of Renton - Administrative Services/City Clerk Division cmoya@rentonwa.gov 425-430-6513 From: Cynthia Moya Sent: Monday, July 02, 2018 5:01 PM To: 'doravin@comcast.net' <doravin@comcast.net> Cc: 'Jay Derr' <jpd@vnf.com>; 'Clara Park' <cpark@vnf.com>; 'Steve Beck' <stevebeck@johnlscott.com>; 'Offe Engineers' <Darrell.offe@comcast.net>; Jason Seth <JSeth@Rentonwa.gov> Subject: RE: Scan_0071.pdf Request for Extension of Wilson Park 1 Approval Mr. & Mrs. Robert Wilson, AGENDA ITEM #7. b) 2 We just received the attached City’s Limited Motion for Reconsideration in the Wilson Park I – Request for Extension of Plat Expiration Thank you, Cindy Moya, City Clerk Specialist City of Renton - Administrative Services/City Clerk Division cmoya@rentonwa.gov 425-430-6513 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) CITY OF RENTON JUL 0 2 2018 1 RECEIVED CITY CLERKS OFFICE 2 3 4 5 6 7 BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER OF THE CITY OF RENTON 8 9 RE: Wilson Park I City of Renton's Limited Motion for Reconsideration 10 Request for Extension of Plat Expiration 11 12 13 14 The City of Renton (the "City") respectfully submits this limited motion for 15 reconsideration of the Hearing Examiner's June 27, 2018 Final Decision (the "Decision") on the Wilson Park I subdivision's request for extension of preliminary plat expiration. 16 Scope of Motion 17 The City agrees with the Decision's analysis supporting the denial of the request to 18 extend the Wilson Park I expiration date. In this limited motion for reconsideration, the City 19 challenges only the Decision's grant of a three-month plat extension (to November 16, 2018) 20 that the Decision made "to account for the uncertainties attributable to the decision-making 21 process in addressing this extension request." Decision at 1:15-16. For the reasons discussed 22 below, the City respectfully requests that the Hearing Examiner reconsider the Decision and 23 issue a modified decision that (1) denies the extension request in full and (2) retains the August 24 16, 2018 preliminary plat approval expiration date for Wilson Park I. 25 Wilson Park I Renton City Attorney 1055 South Grady WayCity's Motion for Reconsideration-1 Renton,WA 98057 Phone: 425.430.6480 Fax: 425.430.6498 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) 1 Discussion 2 The Renton Municipal Code ("RMC") provides that the Hearing Examiner may only grant 3 additional plat extensions if the requestor satisfies strict criteria. Specifically, the requestor 4 must show that "unusual circumstances or situations" caused it to be "unduly burdensome" to 5 proceed without an additional extension. RMC 4-7-080.L.2. These criteria apply to any and every additional extension, including the three-month extension given in the Decision here. 6 However, here, the Decision's analysis explains that the requestors (the Wilsons) did not satisfy 7 the applicable code criteria. In other words, the Decision itself does not support its own three- 8 month extension and is, thus, in conflict with RMC 4-7-080.L.2. 9 Nor could the Wilsons reasonably argue now that the Decision's three-month extension 10 satisfies RMC 4-7-080.L.2's criteria for showings of"unusual circumstances or situations" and 11 undue burden." First, there was no undue delay or burden in the processing of the Wilsons' 12 request for extension. They submitted their request on May 3, 2018, and the Decision issued 13 on June 27, 2018, 50 days before the plat expiration date of August 16, 2018. Meanwhile, the 14 code allows a requestor to wait until just 30 days before plat expiration to even submit a 15 request for an additional extension. RMC 4-7-080.L.W (request for additional extension must 16 "be filed at least thirty (30) days prior to the plat expiration date"). Here, the decision on the 17 Wilsons' request was issued 50 days before plat expiration. The Wilsons received the Decision 18 20 days before they were even required to submit their request. There was no "unusual 19 circumstance or situation" causing "undue burden." 20 Next, there was no evidence before the Hearing Examiner that the Wilsons suspended 21 their plat-related activities after submitting their request for the additional plat extension, 22 which the Decision's three-month extension appears to assume. In fact, the City's Community Economic Development department ("CED") recently received inquiries from potential 23 buyers of the plat, suggesting that marketing of the plat continued. Even if the Wilsons had 24 25 Wilson Park I Renton City Attorney City's Motion for Reconsideration-2 1055 South Grady Way iTS, Renton,WA 98057 Phone: 425.430.6480 Fax: 425.430.6498 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) 1 suspended their plat-related activities while waiting for the Decision, such suspension would 2 not have been reasonable. Nothing in the code authorizes a "tolling" of the expiration date 3 pending the outcome of a request for plat extension. Without such a provision, in CED's 4 experience, it is routine that a plat's interested parties (i.e., both applicants and the local 5 government) rely on the specified plat expiration date unless and until that date is actually extended. 6 Finally, the unsupported three-month extension could allow the very consequences that7 compelled the City to urge denial of the extension request in the first place. For example within8 the three-month period, extensive site clearing and mass grading could commence resulting in9 tree removal, as well as construction of retaining walls, all of which would not be permitted 10 under current code. 11 In sum, because the Decision's three-month extension violates the criteria of RMC 4-7- 12 080.L.2 and could have significant negative consequences to the City, the City respectfully 13 requests that the Hearing Examiner issue a modified decision that (1) denies the extension 14 request in full and (2) retains the August 16, 2018 preliminary plat approval expiration date for 15 Wilson Park I.1 16 Respectfully submitted this!1 day of July, 2018. 17 18 e , C. E. "Chip" Vincent 19 Administrator Community & Economic Department 20 City of Renton 21 22 23 1 Even if the Hearing Examiner disagrees with the City's analysis and denies this limited motion for 24 reconsideration,the City urges the Hearing Examiner to not add additional time to the plat expiration as a consequence of the time taken to decide this motion. 25 Wilson Park I Renton City Attorney City's Motion for Reconsideration-3 w 1055 South Grady Way Renton,WA 98057 Phone: 425.430.6480 Fax: 425.430.6498 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 PLAT EXTENSION REQUEST - 1 BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR THE CITY OF RENTON RE: Wilson Park 1 Request for Extension of Plat Expiration ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) FINAL DECISION Robert and Doravin Wilson have requested extension of the August 16, 2018 preliminary plat approval expiration date for the Wilson Park 1 subdivision to July 5, 2019. The request is denied. However, preliminary plat expiration is extended to November 16, 2018 to account for the uncertainties attributable to the decision-making process in addressing this extension request. The Wilsons first submitted their request for extension by letter dated May 3, 2018. The City filed a response dated May 22, 2018 in which the City requested denial of the extension request. The Wilsons submitted a reply dated June 7, 2018. Requests to extend the expiration of preliminary plat approvals are governed by RMC 4 -7- 080(L)(2), which authorizes extensions by the hearing examiner to approve up to one year extensions “…if the applicant can show need caused by unusual circumstances or situations which make it unduly burdensome to file the final plat…” The standard five year expiration period was extended by the state legislature an additional two years in recognition of the Great Recession that occurred in 2008. The Wilsons have also already acquired an administratively approved one-year extension authorized by RMC 4-7-080(L)(1). The currently proposed extension would extend the expiration period from eight years to nine years. Wilson Park 1 acquired preliminary plat approval in August, 2010. The Wilsons raise some good unusual circumstances that occurred in the first few years of the proposal. Most notably, access to Wilson Park 1 was across adjoining property that went into foreclosure. To maintain their access rights, the Wilsons ultimately purchased the adjoining property and then developed it into a second subdivision, Wilson Park 2. In addition to delays AGENDA ITEM #7. b) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 PLAT EXTENSION REQUEST - 2 caused by the foreclosure, additional delay can be attributable to coordinating development between Wilson Park 1 and 2. The foreclosure and coordinated development issues certainly qualify as unusual circumstances, but the record does not establish a need to go beyond the additional time created by the state legislative expansion of the expiration period from five to seven years and the additional one-year extension already approved. The timeline in the Wilson’s May 3, 2018 request for extension shows that most of the problems caused by the foreclosure and need to coordinate development were resolved by December, 2014, by which time final engineering design had been approved by both the City of Renton and Soos Creek Water District. Beyond December, 2014, there isn’t much in the record to explain why it’s taken an additional three and a half years for the Wilsons to acquire final plat approval. Some declarations in the Wilson reply identify undated issues regarding stormwater design, but these do not appear significant enough to justify another 3.5 years of delay. The additional two years granted by the legislature was intended to address delays created by the Great Recession, which likely encompasses the problems the Wilsons incurred due to the foreclosure of the adjoining property. Problems in marketing the property are not a sufficient justification for further extension, since the Wilsons always had the alternative to develop the property as required for final plat approval, notwithstanding any financial obstacles to this objective. In assessing whether the obstacles faced by the Wilsons makes it “unduly burdensome” to meet final plat deadlines, it is appropriate to consider the public detriment in authorizing the extension. In their May 22, 2018 response the City identified numerous code revisions that have occurred since Wilson Park 1 was approved, including amendments to retaining wall standards that was a matter of considerable public concern in part due to the Wilson subdivisions. Given these public impacts, it is not considered unduly burdensome to the Wilsons to deny the request. It is recognized that the Wilsons development plans may have been put on hold to a certain extent as they waited for a decision on their extension request. To mitigate against this impact to the Wilsons, the Wilson Park 1 preliminary plat expiration is extended to November 16, 2018. DATED this 27th day of June, 2018. City of Renton Hearing Examiner Appeal Right and Valuation Notices The RMC does not identify whether a hearing examiner decision on plat expiration requests is appealable to the City Council. If the Wilsons wish to appeal, they should consult with their attorney and the City’s Planning Department to ascertain their appeal rights. In the absence of AGENDA ITEM #7. b) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 PLAT EXTENSION REQUEST - 3 clear appeal rights, a common strategy is to appeal both administratively (in this case the City Council) and judicially (under the Land Use Petition Act, Chapter 36.70C RCW). City Council appeals must be filed within 14 days of the issuance of this decision and judicial appeals must be filed within 21 days of the issuance of this decision. A request for reconsideration to the hearing examiner may also be filed as outlined in RMC 4-8-100(I). Affected property owners may request a change in valuation for property tax purposes notwithstanding any program of revaluation. AGENDA ITEM #7. b) June 7,2018 VIA EMAIL Mr.Phil Olbrechts Renton Hearing Examiner 1055 S.Grady Way Renton,WA 98057 Ref:(1)Request for Additional Extension Pursuant to Renton Municipal Code 4-7-080 (2)Wilson Park 1 Preliminary Plat LUA 09-140,PP,12 lots (3)Wilson Park 2 Preliminary Plat LUA 12-013,PP,PUD,10 lots Dear Sir: This letter is in support of our Request for Additional Extension Pursuant to Renton Municipal Code 4—7—080,and in reply to the City’s Request for Denial. Preliminarily,our request is not for a “nine-year extension,”as the City calls it,but rather for a limited and brief 11-month extension of the validity of the Wilson Park 1 Preliminary Plat,which is set to expire on August 16,2018.Our request seeks to extend the approval to July 5,2019 only,which coincides with the Wilson Park 2 approval period.The Code allows for additional time extensions of preliminary plat approvals “if the applicant can show need caused by unusual circumstances or situations which make it unduly burdensome to ?le the ?nal plat ...”As explained in our request,the Wilson Park 1 preliminary plat approval faced unusual circumstances,such as the need to obtain approvals and develop plans incorporating a second preliminary plat.Although the two plats are interdependent and necessary,the time spent on the second plat consumed a signi?cant portion of the Wilson Park 1 approval period. To further explain some of the challenges we faced,attached are Declarations from Steve A. Beck and Darrell Offe,who worked on the plats.Both professionals opined that this project was unusually difficult and burdensome compared to other projects in their experience. Further,contrary to the City’s characterizations of our efforts,the Declarations demonstrate that we have been working diligently and in good faith to ?le the ?nal plat.The City previously granted a one-year extension under the Code,indicating that the City believed we demonstrated good faith effort.(See Code 4-7-080.L.l (allowing a one-year extension if the applicant demonstrates good faith effort)).We believe that,if granted,the limited ll-month extension will allow us suf?cient time to obtain ?nal plat approval. Please let us know if you require any additional information to support our request. Thank you, Robert and Doravin Wilson ????/14 wax;Z4/54424:, AGENDA ITEM #7. b) 10 ll 12 l3 l5 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23, 24 25 BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON In the Matter of the “Request for Additional Extension Pursuant to Renton Municipal Code 4-7-080”submitted by Robert and Doravin Wilson: Hearing Examiner File DECLARATION OF STEVEN A.BECK IN SUPPORT OF REQUEST FOR Wilson Park 1 Preliminary Plat LUA 09-ADDITIONAL EXTENTION 140,PP,12 Lots » Wilson Park 2 Preliminary Plat LUA I2- 013,PP,PUD,10 Lots I,Steven A.Beck,declare and state as follows: 1.I am over eighteen years of age,have personal knowledge of the matters herein,and am competent to testify regarding all matters set forth herein. 2.I have over 40 years of experience working as a real estate broker in the State of Washington.My work has been primarily concentrated in the Renton/Southeast King County area. 3.I am currently a broker with John L.Scott Real Estate.Previously,I was the founder and owner of a real estate research company called New Construction DECLARATION OF STEVEN A.BECK -1 VanNess Feldman 719 Second Avenue,Suite 1150 Seattle,WA 98104 (206)623~9372 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) C>\DOO\lO\ ll 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Services.I sat on the Regional Real Estate Board for King County in the 1980s,and in 1992 I was the President of the Northwest Multiple Listing Service,a nonpro?t,member- owned organization of real estate professionals.In 1991 I sat on the first surface water manual development committee,representing both the May Valley and the Cedar River basins and the Highlands Redevelopment Committee with the City of Renton.I have been involved in land development since the mid—1980s,and I worked on some of the ?rst large developments in the Renton area.I have been involved in over 30 subdivision developments in various capacities such as overseeing acquisition,and I have been involved as a developer in approximately 15 subdivisions,such as a 32-lot development off of Northeast 4”‘Street,called Beclan Place. 4.When working on development projects,I act an end product advisor, seeing the end product and working it back to the dirt stage.I monitor and am involved in various aspects of the development,ranging from soils analysis;stormwater management, design,and best management practices;lot layout and design;and access and road standards.Through my experience in land development,I have become familiar with the regulations relating to civil construction and plat approval. 5.I ?rst began working on this project with Robert and Doravin Wilson around 2010.In my career working in land development,this project has been the most complicated subdivisions I have ever been involved with and has faced unusual, unforeseen circumstances.The site of the ?rst preliminary plat,Wilson Park 1,had attractive features such as quality soils and potential for views,but also had some site 1,VanNess ~Feldman DECLARATION OF STEVEN A.BECK -2 719 Second Avenue,Suite 1150 Seattle.WA 98104 (206)623-9372 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) 10 ll 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 difficulties at the outset.For example,the site had challenging topography and required heavy cut and ?lls on—siteto meet grading requirements. 6.After we received the preliminary plat approval,we discovered the property adjacent to Wilson Park 1 was going through foreclosure.The preliminaryplat approval for Wilson Park 1 depended on an access and utility easement across the adjacent property.The foreclosure jeopardized the access and utility easement rights. Consequently,to preserve the easement rights for Wilson Park 1,on March 2011 the Wilsons purchased the adjacent property,which became the subject of the second preliminary plat,Wilson Park 2. 7.The Wilson Park 2 site had complicated zoning issues,with an overlay and different zoning designations on portions of the site.To modify some of the development standards,the Wilsons applied for planned urban development approval in addition to the preliminary plat approval.This process was an additional unforeseen step,and though the Wilsons acted quickly,the application process took over a year and received approval on July 2012. 8.With the Wilson Park 2 site,we had to relook at engineering plans from scratch to combine the two sites into one integrated project.Thus,we could not complete ?nal engineering for the Wilson Park 1 site until more than three years after the Wilson Park 1 preliminary plat approval. 9.We received approval of our final engineering drawings and water plans from the City and from Soos Creek Water and Sewer District on December 2014.At this DECLARATION OF STEVEN A.BECK -3 1 VanNess i FeldmanIL" 719 Second Avenue,Suite 1150 Seattle.WA 98104 (206)623-9372 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) C\O0G\]O\ 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 point,because of the need to incorporate Wilson Park 2,we had used up four years of the Wilson Park 1 approval period and were unable to market or pursue ?nal plat approval during this time. 10.When we received ?nal engineering approval,the housing market was just coming out of the doldrums.We went to market very shortly after we received the engineering approval.We initially listed the property for approximately $90,000 per unit, which was an appropriate starting price close to market price for this property and its characteristics.We have had over six deals,though the deals fell through,in part because of the economic conditions,the site’s challenging topography,and the costs of constructing improvements. 11.We have listed the property eight times,and each time we continually dropped the price until it has now reached under $50,000 per unit,which is an extremely competitive price.For comparison,one comparable undeveloped property within a few hundred feet of the Wilson Park site closed in 2015 for a price of approximately $58,300 per lot.Despite this price,potential buyers have been reluctant to close on the property because of the upcoming expiration of the Wilson Park 1 preliminary plat approval. Moreover,the City no longer accepts bonds in lieu of construction,which limits our options to market the property and increasesthe uncertainty for potential buyers. 12.Potential buyers who have expressed interest in the site have informed me that if Wilson Park l’s expiration date were extended to July 2019 to coincide with 1 VanNess 4'Feldman 719 Second Avenue,Suite115D Seattle.WA 98104 (206)623-9372 DECLARATION OF STEVEN A.BECK -4 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) A-IO\U1 10 ll 12 l3 l4 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Wilson Park 2’s expiration,the extension would afford sufficient time to complete construction of improvements and obtain ?nal plat approval for both preliminary plats. 13.In my opinion,and based on the feedback from potential buyers,Wilson Park 1 and 2 must be approved and marketed as a single development project,because the two sites are linked and dependent upon each other.For example,the stormwater design is dependent on developing both sites together~the stormwater drainage vault for Wilson Park 1 was originally planned to be within Wilson Park II,and was later revised to accommodate both Wilson Park 1 and 2.This unusual linkage,combined with the site’s engineering challenges,made this a particularly difficult project and required substantially more time and effort than any other subdivision development I have ever been involved with. 14.Moreover,because of the linkage,if the Wilson Park 1 plat approval were to expire,the Wilsons will lose their signi?cant investment in both Wilson Park 1 and 2. 15.Despite the challenges this project has faced,I believe that if the extension is granted,the project will be ready for ?nal plat approval in time.I also believe the project will add valuable housing inventory to the City and will help meet the current high demand for single-family homes. // // // §VanNGSS 3 Feldman 719 Second Avenue,Suite 1150 Seattle,WA 58104 (206)623-9372 DECLARATION OF STEVEN A.BECK -5 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 I declare under the penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the foregoingis true and correct. DECLARATIONOF STEVEN A.BECK -6 Steven A.Beck,Declaran VanNBSS Feldman 719 Second Avenue,Suite 1150 Seattle,WA 98104 (206)623-9372 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) LA)\lO\U1-l> ll 12 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 25 BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON In the Matter of the “Request for Additional Extension Pursuant to Renton Municipal Code 4-7-0230”submitted by Hearing Examiner File Robert and Doravin Wilson: DECLARATION OF DARRELL OFFE IN Wilson Park 1 Preliminary Plat LUA 09-SUPPORT OF REQUEST ‘OR 140,PP,12 Lots ADDITIONAL EXTENSION Wilson Park 2 Prelilnjnary Plat LUA 12- 013,PP,PUD,10 Lots 1,Darrell Offe,declare and state as follows: 1.I am over eighteen years of age,have personal knowledge of the matters herein,and am competent to testify regarding all matters set forth herein. 2.I have over 40 years of construction experience,ranging from single family residential projects to high rise commercial office buildings to heavy civil constructlon.I have been a Registered Professional Engineer in the State of Washington since Odtober 1990 (28 years)and in the State of Wyoming since November 2009. DECLARATION OF DARRELL OFFE .1 VanNess Feldman 719 second Avenue.Sul Seattle,WA 98104 (208)623-9372 e1150 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) Lo.)-P\IC\kI1 10 ll 12 13 14 3.Since becoming a Professional Engineer,the large majority of my experience has been in single family residential development,and I have worked on a large number of projects.I have worked on projects in King County,City of Redmond,C Auburn,City of Kent,City of Renton,City of Pnyallup,City of Seattle,City of Mercer Island,City of Bellevue,City of Kirkland,City of Clyde Hill and City of Burien.Ne projects include 1994 Street of Dreams —Summit Ridge (Bellevue);Pinnacle (Bellevue);Rainier Shadows/Willow Park (Auburn);The Parks (Lake Desire/Shady (King County)and View Point at Maple Ridge (Renton). 4.My commercialexperience includes providing civil engineeringand S1 for design and construction on numerous projects in Redmond such as the Pro Sports the Lakeridge office development,the Daytona and Laguna Of?ce projects for Properties,and Microsoft’s campus.My heavy construction experience includes ' table Point lake) pport Club, Hart ieavy equipment operation and construction surveying for projects in Wyoming and Utall,and acting as project engineer for construction on Shuster Parkway (L705)from L5 to Street ~Tacoma. Dock 5.1 am the engineer who signed and stamped the ?nal approved engineering drawings for Wilson Park 1 and 2,combined as one 22-lot development,and I work 1;he preliminary plat and planned unit development (“PUD”)approval for Wilson Par 6.In my opinion,based on my experience,this project faced a numlf unusual delays and circumstances.The timeline for obtaining the preliminary plat DECLARATION OF DARRELL OFFE —2 VanNess Feldman 719 secund Avenue,suite 1150 Seattle,WA 98104 (206)523-9372 ed on (2. /PUD ity of er of AGENDA ITEM #7. b) DJO\U1-l§ 10 11 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 IQLu[\)-P 25 approval and the approval of the ?nal engineering and design plans exceeded the average timeline for obtaining approvals for a project of this type and scale. 7.For example,although the Wilson Park 1 and 2 sites are within the City of Renton water service area the City granted permission to Soos Creek Water and $ewer District to be the water purveyor for the sites.This process took an additional two months of negotiations between the Wilsons,the City,and the District,and the District had to for and obtain approval for the expanded service area. apply 8.Additionally,the Wilson Park 2 site had an overlay and different zoning designations on various portions of the site.We spent considerable time working with the City to determine how to handle the split zoning issues and what process the City would use,which led to the need to apply for a PUD in addition to the preliminary plat.Whilethe end result was productive,the process extended the timeline for obtaining approvals. 9.The City also wished to condition approval for Wilson Park 2 providing pedestrian linkage to the nearest Renton School District bus stop.The con was unusual given the project’s size (10 lots)and the confusing layout of school bus r The project is close to the boundary between the Renton and Kent School District both districts had school buses operating in the area.Determining the actual locati upon dition outes. ,and ns of the routes and stops for the two districts,and determining the City’s requirements for the Walkway,required multiple conversations.We then needed to bring in a surveyor to provide additional topographical information for the pedestrian walkway design.This process DECLARATION or DARRELL om:-3 VanNess Feldman 719 Second Avenue,Suite 1150 Seattle,WA 98104 (206)623-9372 alone AGENDA ITEM #7. b) -J>\lO\U1 took four months from the time we began working to meet the condition to the topogi survey. 10. aphic After we received the preliminary plat/PUD approval and the engineering plans were ready for review,additional delays occurred.The plans were reviewed under the direction of three different supervisors.One of the supervisors refused to provide final approval based on the location of the stormwater vault.The vault’s location had been shown on the preliminary plat application and on every set of plans we had submitted to theiCity, so the refusal to approve came as a surprise.After the Stonnwater Utility Department approved the location,the supervisor conceded and gave verbal approval,but the pl of attempting to negotiate took considerable time.Further,the supervisor required that OCSSS three access ports be provided on the vault,although the Code only required two access ports.In this case,we revised the plans to accommodate the supervisor’s requirement.This process of working with the City on these matters consumed an additional six weeks,beyondthe normal time period for review and approval of the final plans. 11. is granted,the project will be ready for ?nal plat approval in time. Despite the challenges this project has faced,I believe that if the extension I declare under the penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct. DECLARATION or DARRELL om:—4 VanNess Feldman 719 Second Avenue.Suite 1150 Seattle,WA 98104 (206)523-9372 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) DECLARATION OF DARRELL OF FE —5 VanNess Feldman 719 Second Avenue,Sui Seattle,WA 98104 (205)623-9372 e 1150 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) 1 Cynthia Moya From:Phil Olbrechts <olbrechtslaw@gmail.com> Sent:Thursday, May 31, 2018 5:10 PM To:Jason Seth Cc:Cynthia Moya Subject:Re: Request For Extension Please forward to Ms. Henning and the Wilsons. At this point I have not received a request from the City or the Wilsons for a hearing on the Wilson May 3, 2018 request for extension of preliminary plat expiration. Consequently, the Wilsons may email a written reply to the City's May 22, 2018 response, due by 5:00 pm, June 8, 2018. The reply should be emailed to Ms. Moya or delivered to her by that deadline. Ms. Moya is in the Renton City Clerk's Office and her email address is CMoya@rentonwa.gov. On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 8:34 PM, Phil Olbrechts <olbrechtslaw@gmail.com> wrote: Thank you for the information. Please forward this email to the Wilsons and Jennifer Henning, cc'd to all remaining parties of interest (Wilsons or Henning) and myself. If you are unable to acquire an email for the Wilsons, please let me know and I will make other arrangements for addressing the extension request. Parties (Wilsons and Henning): I am in receipt of the May 3, 2018 Wilson request for extension of preliminary plat expiration and the May 22,2018 response to that request. I do not see any requirement in the Renton Municipal Code to hold a hearing for this type of request. If any party believes that a hearing is required, please let me know. In the absence of a hearing mandate we have some flexibility on how to process the extension request. If either party wishes to have a hearing on the request, I will order one held. If both parties are fine relying upon the written materials submitted thus far, I will give the Wilsons an opportunity to submit a written reply to the City's May 22, 2018 response and base my ruling upon the May 3, 2018 extension request, the May 22, 2018 City response and the Wilson's reply. If the parties have some other preference as to how to proceed I am certainly willing to consider alternatives. Please let me know of your preference on how to proceed by 5:00 pm, May 28, 2018 by email to all the parties of this email as well as the Wilsons. If I don't receive any preferences by the May 28, 2018 due date I will set a due date for a Wilson reply and subsequently issue a ruling on the extension request. On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 10:07 AM, Jason Seth <JSeth@rentonwa.gov> wrote: Phil, I received this letter requesting an extension on a short plat application. CED and the Attorney’s office would like to discuss it with you. Thank you, -Jason Jason Seth, CMC AGENDA ITEM #7. b) 2 City Clerk City of Renton 425-430-6502 jseth@rentonwa.gov This communication may be subject to public disclosure laws of the State of Washington (RCW 42.56). AGENDA ITEM #7. b) DenisLawMayorCommunity&EconomicDevelopmentC.E.“Chip”Vincent,AdministratorMay22,2018Mr.PhilOlbrechtsRentonHearingExaminer1055SouthGradyWayRenton,WA98057Subject:WilsonPark1PreliminaryPlatLUA09-140,PP,12totsWilsonPark2PreliminaryPlatLUA12-013,PP,PUD,10totsRequestforDenialofMay3,2018“RequestforAdditionalExtensionPursuanttoRentonMunicipalCode4-7-080”submittedbyRobertandDoravinWilsonDearMr.Olbrechts:TheCityofRentonCommunity&EconomicDevelopmentDepartment(“CED”)respectfullyrequeststhattheHearingExaminerdismisstheMay3,2018requestbyRobertandDoravinWilsonforan“AdditionalExtensionPursuanttoRentonMunicipalCode4-7-080”forlanduseapprovalsassociatedwiththedevelopmentsitesreferencedabove,WilsonPark1andWilsonPark2.Asexplainedbelow,theWilsons’requestforan11-monthextensionforWilsonPark1shouldbedenied.TheApplicantsHaveNotMetTheirBurdentoProve“UnusualCircumstancesorSituationswhichMakeItUndulyBurdensome”toJustifyObtainingaNine-YearExtensionTheWilsons’requestan11-month“additionalextension”forthepreliminaryplatofWilsonPark1,arguingthatcircumstancesoccurringsincetheHearingExaminer’sAugust2010preliminaryplatapprovaljustifyanadditionalextensiontoJuly5,2019.TheWilsons’focusontherelativelyshort(11-month)extensiondeemphasizesthattheWilsonPark1preliminaryplatwasapprovedeightyearsago,in2010.TheWilsons’newrequestwouldextendthedelaybetweenpreliminaryplatandfinalplattoatotalofnineyears.TheWilsons’requestforanine-yearpreliminaryplatperiodfailstomeetRMC4-7-080.L.2’scriteriafortheapplicanttoshowthat“unusualcircumstancesorsituations”havemadeit“undulyburdensome”fortheapplicanttohavetimelysubmittedforfinalplatapproval.1055SouthGradyWay,Renton,WA98057.rentonwa.govAGENDA ITEM #7. b) Mr.PhilOlbrechtsPage2of2May22,2018First,theWilsons’havenotproved“unusualcircumstancesorsituations”justifyinganine-yearplattingperiod.lftheacquisitionoftheWilsonPark2propertyhadonlyrecentlybecomenecessary,theWilsons’mighthavedemonstratedsufficientunusualorcircumstances.But,here,theWilsons’acquiredtheWilsonPark2propertysevenyearsago,in2011.Therearenocurrentorrecentcircumstancesorsituationsjustifyinganadditionalextension.Second,theWilsons’havenotprovedthatitwas“undulyburdensome”forthemtofileafinalplatwithineightyearsofpreliminaryplatapproval.Ratherthanalleviateaburden,theWilsons’requestindicatesthatdelayingtheWilsonParkItimelinetoalignwiththeWilsonParkIItimelineisbasedinconveniencetotheapplicantandmarketabilityofacombineddevelopment.TheWilsons’shouldnotgainadvantagebytyingtheearlierWilsonParkItimelinetothelater-plattedWilsonPark;iftheWilsons’prefertotakethetwoplatssimultaneouslythroughthefinalplattingprocess,itshouldbedonesoontheearlierWilsonParkItimeline.TheWilsons’acquiredtheWilsonPark2propertyin2011—theyhavehadampletimetobringtheWilsonParkIplattingactiontimelineinlinewithWilsonPark2.GrantinganadditionalextensionforWilsonPark1wouldextendthelifeofapreliminaryplatthat,inthefaceofcodeamendments,nolongerconformstoprovisionsoftheRentonMunicipalCodeincludingbutnotlimitedto,zoning,stormwater,criticalareas,treestandards,streetstandards,andretainingwallheights.SincethedateofapprovalofWilsonPark1theCityhasadoptedanewcomprehensiveplanincludingnewdevelopmentstandardsassociatedwiththeresidentialzones.Furthermore,thepublicconcernrelatedtoretainingwallsthatstemmedfromanappealassociatedwiththisprojectresultedintheCityconsideringandthenadoptingnewretainingwallheightregulations.Fortheabovereasons,theCityrespectfullyrequeststhattheHearingExaminerdenytheWilsons’requestforanadditionalextensionoftheWilsonParkIpreliminaryplat.Sincerely,?JenniferHenningPlanningDirectorcc:RobertandDoravinWilson.ChipVincent,CEDAdministratorEdPrince,RentonCityCouncilPresidentLeslieClark,SeniorAssistantCityAttorneyRyanMclrvin,RentonCityCouncilmemberJayP.DerrJasonSeth,CityClerkSteveBeckShaneMoloney,CityAttorneyFile—LUAO9-1401055SouthGradyWay,Renton,WA98057.rentonwa.govAGENDA ITEM #7. b) r Robert and Doravin Wilson (owners) 21703 60th St. E Lake Tapps, WA 98391 May 3, 2018 Mr. Phil Olbrechts Renton Hearing Examiner 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 Ref: (1) Request for Additional Extension Pursuant to Renton Municipal Code 4-7-080 2) Wilson Park 1 Preliminary Plat LUA 09-140, PP, 12 lots 3) Wilson Park 2 Preliminary Plat LUA 12-013, PP, PUD, 10 lots Dear Sir: We are Robert and Doravin Wilson, owners of the referenced properties. We bought the property of Ref 2, built a home and lived there from 1977 to 2005, raised a family, and now are retired. We are requesting an 11 month extension to the period of validity for Wilson Park 1, from the current date of August 16, 2018 to July 5, 2019 per provisions of the Renton City Code 4-7-080, Paragraph L.2 "Additional Extensions." July 5, 2019 is the current ending date for the period of validity for Wilson Park 2, Ref 3. This extension would allow both projects, referenced above, to be completed and recorded concurrently as one total project, which has been the intent since final engineering approval by the City of Renton in the 2014 time period as one plat of 22 lots. The final engineering design is based on combined development of both plats. This letter explains the unusual circumstances surrounding the two separate preliminary plat applications and the need to combine the two preliminary plats into a single development proposal, thus satisfying the code requirements for an additional extension. The following timeline details the progress of the referenced project: AGENDA ITEM #7. b) 1. August , 2010— Hearing Examiner approval of Wilson Park 1 Preliminary Plat, City File No. LUA 09-140. This preliminary plat approval was based upon an access and utility easement across adjacent property. A copy of this easement is attached to this letter as Attachment A. 2. October, 2010—Trustee's deed transferring the adjacent property across which we had our access and utility easement pursuant to bank foreclosure. This foreclosure jeopardized access and utility easement rights and thus triggered the need to negotiate acquisition of the adjacent property from the bank to protect access. A copy of that Trustee deed to the bank is attached to this letter as Attachment B. 3. March, 2011—We purchased adjacent property from the bank. A copy of the Bargain and Sale deed to us from the bank is attached to this letter as Attachment C. This acquisition triggered both the need and the opportunity to re-evaluate plat design to develop both parcels with common access, utility and stormwater infrastructure and grading to maximize ability to balance cuts and fills on the combined property. 4. July, 2012— Hearing Examiner approval of Wilson Park 2 Preliminary Plat the property we acquired from the bank), City File No. LUA 12-013. 5. June, 2014— City of Renton signed and stamped our Final Engineering drawings for Wilson Park 1 and 2 combined as one overall project. A copy of the final engineering drawings is attached as Attachment D. 6. December, 2014—Soos Creek Water District approved and signed design drawings for the overall 22 lot development. Attachment E. 7. July 26, 2015— City of Renton granted a one- year extension for Wilson Park 1 per our request. Attachment F. As this summary timeline and the attached documents demonstrate, we had to buy the Wilson Park 2 property in 2011 because a bank was foreclosing on the previous owner. We found out that our easement rights to put the road across the now Wilson Park 2 property to Wilson Park 1 would be eliminated by the foreclosure. 2 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) c. These circumstances delayed us in preparing final engineering for Wilson Park 1 for about a year and a half. We hired engineering to file a preliminary plat of the Wilson Park 2 property and began final engineering of the combined properties into one overall development. Combining development of the two parcels facilitated access, grading, utilities and stormwater design as an integrated project. The requested additional extension for Wilson Park 1 validity period will allow Wilson Park 1 and 2 to continue to be linked together for overall development. It has always been planned that the two properties will be constructed together, thereby allowing optimum grading of the roadway slopes and building pads without need for import or export of grading materials. A structural wall is required at the curve linking both properties, and the storm water vault serving both properties is located on Wilson Park 2. These are further illustrations the two properties are interdependent. The two properties have always been marketed together as one total package of 22 lots. Given the interrelated design, including the topographical challenges of the site, we have been unable to successfully market the plat in the original time periods for preliminary plat approval, despite dropping the selling price significantly over the past two years during a time when home and finished lot prices continue to rise dramatically. More interest is now being shown with our current land pricing plus the effect of rising home sales prices. Recent feedback from possible buyers, though, suggest that the timing of completion of the Wilson Park 1 portion of the development before the expiration date of August 16, 2018 is a real concern. We believe, with feedback from buyers, if Wilson Park 1 expiration date of Aug. 16, 2018 can be extended 11 months to July 5, 2019 coinciding with Wilson Park 2 validation, near term sale of the properties can be accomplished. This extension would allow development of both plats, as always intended. With the current lack of inventory of buildable land and new homes, the City of Renton will benefit sooner if we can make this happen. We have spent a very significant amount of time and effort and money to bring these two properties through preliminary plat approval at different times, and 3 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) then combining them into one project through final engineering and approval by the City of Renton. The unexpected risk to our original access easement caused by the 2010 foreclosure presents the type of unusual and unexpected circumstances that your code specifies for our additional extension request. Obviously, we do not want to lose our investment by allowing Wilson Park 1 period of validity to expire. If Wilson Park 1 expires, Wilson Park 2 can't be built either. The two parcels are combined into one project for final engineering and construction as described above. This linkage between the two plats, one that expires in 2019 and one that expires in 2018 also creates an unusual circumstance beyond our control. We are sincerely asking you for your consideration and approval of this request for an 11 month extension of the period of validity for Wilson Park 1 preliminary plat approval from August 16, 2018 to July 5, 2019. This will synch the deadlines for these two interrelated plats. If you require any of this information to be submitted in the form of a sworn declaration, we would be happy to work with our land use attorney, Jay Derr, to prepare one. However, he indicated that the city code provision for extensions does not require a new evidentiary hearing and thus suggested that for simplicity and because time is of the essence, we submit our request directly. Please let us know if you require any additional information to support our request. Thank You, Robert and Doravin Wilson— Owners (253-208-3263) i7 Cc: Jay P. Derr, C.E."Chip" Vincent, Jennifer T. Henning, Shane Moloney, Ed Prince, Ryan Mclrvin, Steve Beck Attachments: 6 4 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) q / jj IIII 1 I 1 1, 11 11,1 ,111 AFTER RECORDING MAIL TO: 111 f I I ' 1, i Id 11r 1 1 11,1 IpS' ROBERT D.WISON 20080327002018 COMMONWEALTH L EAS 45.00 720 SO, 55TH ST. PROEM OF 004 03/27/2008 15:17 RENTON..WA 98055 KING COUNTY, WA E2338944 03/27/2008 15:06 KING COUNTY, WA TAX 81,429.00 SALE 80,000.00 PAGE001 OF 001 ROAD AND UTILITY EASEMENT o45/ ROAD AND UTILITY EASEMENT executed this 24th day of March, 20 8, by and between ERIK DORMAIER. a single man, (hereinafter referred to as "Grantor"), and ROBERT D. WILSON and DORAVIN A. WILSON, husband and wife, (hereinafter referred to as Grantees"). WHEREAS: Grantor is the owner,in fee simple, of that certain real property situate in the City of Renton,King County,Washington,legally described as follows: The East 317 feet of the West 1,003 feet of the South 318 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 31, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in King County, Washington; Said document(s) were filed for record EXCEPT County Road. by Commonwealth Land Title as accommodation hereinafter referred to as "Parcel A") only. It has not been examined as to proper Tax Parcel Number: 312305-9119-00 execution or as to its effect upon title. AND WHEREAS; Grantees are the owners, in fee simple, of that certain real property commonly known as 720 South 55th Street,Renton,Washington,legally described as follows: Parcel 3, King County Short Plat No. 674217, recorded under Recording No. 7603170525, in King County,Washington. hereinafter referred to as "Parcel B") Tax Parcel Number: 312305-9125-02 AND WHEREAS; the parties hereto do hereby desire to grant a non-exclusive easement for ingress, egress and utilities over, under, upon, across and through a portion of the said Parcel A, for the benefit of the said Parcel B; Road and Utility Easement-Page 1 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) 44•I v?('..0 r c WITNESSETH _ NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION of the sum of Eighty Thousand and No/100 Dollars, ($80,000.00), and the mutual promises, covenants and agreements contained herein, and the mutual benefits to be derived therefrom, the parties hereto do hereby promise, covenant and agree as follows: 1. Grantor does hereby grant and convey to the owners of the said Parcel B, their heirs, executors, successors and/or assigns, a non-exclusive easement for ingress, egress and utilities over,under, upon,across and through that portion of the said Parcel A, described as follows: An easement for ingress, egress and utilities lying 25 feet on each side of the following described centerline: Beginning at the Southeast Corner of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 31,Township 23 North, Range 5 East,W.M., in King County,Washington; Thence North along the East Line of said Section 31 to the Northeast Corner of the South 318 feet of said Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 31; Thence West along the North Line of the South 318.00 feet of the said Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 31, a distance of 497.37 feet to the Point of Beginning of this description; Thence South along a line parallel with the East Line of the East 317.00 feet of the West 1003.00 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 31 to a point on the South Line of said Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 31 and the terminus of this description, extending and shortening the side lines as to terminate at the property line; EXCEPT County Roads. hereinafter referred to as "Road and Utility Easement") 2. The parties hereto acknowledge that both Parcel A and Parcel B are being marketed for sale. In the event that both Parcel A and Parcel B are sold to or acquired by the same party or related entities of the same party, then Erik Dormaier, a single man, shall refund to Robert D. Wilson and Doravin A. Wilson,husband and wife, all consideration paid for this Road and Utility Easement. 3. The owners of the said Parcels A and B shall be equally responsible for and shall each pay 50% of the costs and expenses of the installation, maintenance, repair, replacement and/or improvement said Road and Utility Easement until such time as said Road and Utility Easement becomes a dedicated City of Renton Street; provided, the owners of Parcel B shall have no obligation for such costs and expenses until said Road and Utility Easement is being used by them. and for the benefit of said Parcel B;provided further, in the event said Road and Utility Easement is used only for utility purposes, the obligation referred to herein above shall be limited to those related to the utility purposes and shall not include obligations, expenses etc., as relate to ingress and egress. The parties acknowledge their intent to make improvements to said Easement so that the City of Renton will accept said improved right of way as a city street; provided, Robert D. Road and Utility Easement-Page 2 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) itac--4‘ Wilson and Doravin A.Wilson shall have no personal liability for any of the aforementioned costs and expenses. 4. The owners of Parcel B shall have the right to grant utility easements over, under and across said Easement to any and all providers including, but not limited to, electrical power, natural gas,water and sewer,cable and other or related utilities etc. 5. The parties hereto shall cooperate in taking all necessary steps in dedicating or otherwise transferring said roadway to the City of Renton as a public right of way as soon as the road improvements have been completed in accordance with the requirements of the City of Renton. And as part of the development of either of the parcels described hereinabove (Parcel A and/or Parcel B), when the said Easement has been dedicated to the City of Renton as a public right of way, then this Easement, with the exception of provisions contained in Paragraph 2 above, and the right of contribution contained in Paragraph 3 above, shall immediately terminate and shall be of no force and effect. 6. Covenant Running with Lands/Attorney's Fees. This Agreement shall be a covenant running with the lands described herein, and shall inure to the benefit of the parties hereto, their heirs, executors, successors and/or assigns. In the event that any party to this Agreement, their heirs, executors, successors and/or assign, retains the services of an attorney to enforce any provision of this Agreement,the prevailing party in such enforcement proceedings shall be entitled to recover their reasonable attorney's fees and costs incurred therein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have hereunto set their hands the date and year first above written. ERIK DORMAIER 7?-444L ROBERT D.WILSON DORAVIN A. WILSON Road and Utility Easement-Page 3 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. COUNTY OF KING On this day personally appeared before me, a notary public, Erik Dormaier, to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the within instrument and acknowledged that he signed the same as his free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes herein mentioned. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL this day of March, 2008. n * ySIOkF, 4 y V` a , r0'q i4y Print Craig D. hielbar 4 1r .. _ ca; NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of ov \G la...-; Washington; residing at Puyallup 8,3 t„t0 My Commission Expires: 8/30/2009 r- qi: 1tiwAs` .: STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. COUNTY OF KING On this day personally appeared before me, a notary public, Robert D. Wilson and Doravin A. Wilson, to me known to be the individuals described in and who executed the within instrument and acknowledged that they signed the same as their free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes herein mentioned. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL this Lday of March, 2008. V. r 1 .d A ' Printer z'!' rain D. ' uelbar NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of N9 iRr'8300 '? Washington,residing at Puyallup iirFO" , N`. Y My Commission Expires: 8/30/2009 Road and Utility Easement-Page 4 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) iIII 1111111111 1111 After recording return to:20101027000645PatrickK.McKenzie MARSH MUNDORF TD 64.00 Marsh Mundorf Pratt Sullivan+McKenzie, Pie z @zelrF1 0e 16504 9th Avenue SE, Suite 203 KING COUNTY, WA Mill Creek, WA 98012 E2464251 10/27/2010 12:00 KING COUNTY, WA TAX SALE 0. 00 PAGE-001 OF 001 Document Title:Trustee's Deed Reference No. 20061229002003 Grantor: Marsh Mundorf Pratt Sullivan+McKenzie,P.S.C.,Trustee Grantee: Prime Pacific Bank N.A. Legal Des:PTN SEC 31, TWP23 N, R 5 E Assessor Parcel No. 312305-9119-00 TRUSTEE'S DEED The Grantor, Marsh Mundorf Pratt Sullivan + McKenzie, P.S.C., as successor Trustee under that Deed of Trust, as hereinafter particularly described, in consideration of the premises and payment recited below, hereby grants and conveys, without warranty, to Prime Pacific Bank, N.A., Grantee, that real property, situated in the County of King, State of Washington, legally described as follows: THE EAST 317 FEET OF THE WEST 1,003 FEET OF THE SOUTH 318 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 31,TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH,RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT COUNTY ROAD 1. This Conveyance is made pursuant to the powers, including the power of sale, conferred upon said Trustee by that certain Deed of Trust between Eric Dormaier, as Grantor, to Prime Pacific Bank.N.A.,as Beneficiary,dated December 22,2006,and recorded on December 29, 2006 under King County Recording No.20061229002003,records of King County, Washington. 2. Said Deed of Trust was executed to secure, together with other undertakings, the payment of a promissory note in the principal sum of$785,000.00 with interest thereon, according to the terms thereof, in favor of Prime Pacific Bank, N.A. and to secure any other sums of money which might become due and payable under the terms of said Deed of Trust. AGENDA ITEM #7. b) 3. The described Deed of Trust provides that the real property conveyed therein is not used principally for agricultural or farming purposes. 4. Default having occurred in the obligations secured and/or covenants of the Grantor as set forth in "Notice of Trustee's Sale" described below, which by the terms of the Deed of Trust made operative the power to sell, the thirty day advance "Notice of Default" was transmitted to the Grantor, or his successor in interest, and a copy of said Notice was posted or served in accordance with law. 5. Prime Pacific Bank N.A., being the holder of the indebtedness secured by said Deed of Trust, delivered to said Trustee a request directing said Trustee to sell the described property in accordance with the law and the terms of said Deed of Trust. 6. The defaults specified in the "Notice of Default" not having been cured,the Trustee, in compliance with the terms of said Deed of Trust,executed and on June 28, 2010 recorded in the office of the King County Recorder, a "Notice of Trustee's Sale" of said property under recording No. 20100628000192. 7. The Trustee, in its aforesaid "Notice of Trustee's Sale" fixed the place of sale at the main entrance, King County Administration Building, 500 Fourth Avenue, Seattle, Washington on October 15,2010, at 10:00 o'clock a.m., and in accordance with law,caused copies of the statutory Notice of Trustee's Sale" to be transmitted by mail to all persons entitled thereto and either posted or served prior to ninety days before the sale; further, the Trustee caused a copy of said "Notice of Trustee's Sale" to be published between the thirty-fifth and twenty-eighth day before the date of sale,and once between the fourteenth and seventh day before the date of sale; and further, included with this Notice, which was transmitted or served to or upon the Grantor or their successor in interest, a "Notice of Foreclosure" in substantially the statutory form, to which copies of the Grantor's Note and Deed of Trust were attached. 8. During foreclosure, no action was pending on an obligation secured by said Deed of Trust. 9. All legal requirements and all provisions of said Deed of Trust have been complied with,as to acts to be performed and notices to be given,as provided in Chapter 61.24 RCW. 10. The defaults specified in the"Notice of Trustee's Sale"not having been cured eleven days prior to the date of Trustee's Sale and said obligation secured by said Deed of Trust remaining unpaid, on October 15, 2010 the date of sale, which was not less than 190 days from the date of default in the obligation secured, the Trustee then and there sold at public auction to said Grantee, the highest bidder therefore,the property hereinabove described. AGENDA ITEM #7. b) DATED this 18th day of October,2010. MARSH MUNDORF PRATT SULLIVAN MCKENZIE,P.S.C. C;30 -0. By:Patrick K.McKenzie,Secretary Trustee STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH ) On this day personally appeared Patrick K. McKenzie, to me known to be the person described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument as Secretary of Marsh Mundorf Pratt Sullivan +McKenzie, P.S.C. and on oath stated that he was authorized to execute said instrument on behalf of the corporation, and acknowledged the same to be the free and voluntary act of said entity,for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. GIVEN under my hand and official seal on October 18th,2010. SvsAN L. Q N07'4RY `m Print name: ,SJ,GS,94 ti) 'u i f Notary Public in and for the State of o.?0j3 Washington,residing at ot,*tt GAO My commission expires: /1—In— /. le'ASHAN SKlwNPtae Pbd&BakWit K,ommiea eeI Aee6Aee AGENDA ITEM #7. b) A± 111111101111111120110317000 3Afterrecordingjreturnto:NORTH?OINT ESC 0 63.00 72 Robert Wilson and Doravin Wilson 03/17//22011F12:04 21703 60th Si E KING COUNTY, WA Lake Tapps,WA 98391 E2482673 03/17/2011 12:02 KING COUNTY, UA TAX 4,455.00 SALE 250,000.00 PAGE-001 OF 001 Reference: 30048506 -326-301 escrow+title order no. BARGAIN AND SALE DEEDorder O p[,p. THE GRANTORS) Prime Pacific Bank,N.A., a National banking association for and in consideration of Two hundred fifty thousand and no/100 Dollars ($250,000.00), in hand paid, bargains, sells, and conveys to Robert Wilson and Doravin Wilson, husband and wife the following described real estate, situated in the County of King,state of Washington: THE EAST 317 FEET OF THE WEST 1,003 FEET OF THE SOUTH 318 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST,W.M.,IN KING COUNTY,WASHINGTON; EXCEPT COUNTY ROAD; SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. Abbreviated Legal: (Required if full legal not inserted above) PTN OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 31,TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST,W.M Tax Parcel Number(s): 3123059119 Bargain and Sale Deed Page 1 of 2 LPB-15-05(ltr) (rev. 4/2009) AGENDA ITEM #7. b) X rA e Dated: March':4. 2011 Prime Pacific Bank, N.A. X By: 4r O.a- Its:Scn:.r (Jrw prerti•t }- State of Washington County of 51.0[/Of'Y7/5 k' SS• nIcertifythatIknoworhavesatisfactoryevidencethatah'U(-x is the person who,appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that(he/she) signed this instrument, on oath stated that(he/she) is authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the ep.160 E 192E.6 , of Prima Pacific Bank, N.A. to be the free and voluntary act of.such party for the uses and purposes mentioned In the instrument.Dated: . -if j O/r Given under my hand and official seal the day and year last above written. Notary Public in nd for the State of IN 1 Residing at o l ` LL 1,1101-My Appointment expires: r& —// C. M. PICKRELL NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF WASHINGTON COMMISSION EXPIRES JUNE 9,2011 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) 0, n M NY U 6,.* u° i E e ) z ZNo '-'_ ::PAPA ¢z 1 c¢ F- zsW® wJNZ i _o pro c'^` , c,1--h--,:,--) 3oa9 zz53lm zF 3d w= c H t~W zg $ 33y< Ngj " o . V1 bFnU! Z ow Wq44 ii ZW Y W i 2. zsoW`=wZw1Z.zZNM r( 5i 8„...azz, 7r ¢,„. w xzr i- , wwccon. 0. ozO > r:i'U OH vi u Jd aa3 W. QC..Qtb_tOwW ZrQ 5gP,I vt; g- Z Y 0 00 a z zZpE–W o N m M ,n 9r, Q - gI- lie A9f f coi F- CO iiWft0 l h , II U, Z z N a k w — Z qS a liqX44 l^a j w y, *0 gi a• 11- 0 9 3s 311N3AY;WO1 0 aco 1!: 7 a.g cT Y &2 Z LJ z oo d« pa o gz 4 P' 99th PLACE SOUTH K s'i 'o & igi w 0 sewCl) ov 9err oz ca eh j A' p o4-rc I siiw 1 r W H aoo azz i W uYi••• ! z Htnos arca MTN N .."•••az wZ w • o g icnIa ;, p3m a a W IIIFoy tii 3 Q,- - , vi W 8 kW _' x B3 u aq a O Z r # 0 v J O 4 iY),0!'9[92:d,ZY,£1.IOS nr 76;A:4. ..,-; SOBf£1l .4ori8 J I a I W. L.i 4 1ry Iai n U 4^ N 5 Q u y.l 'i'',n4 I wO u U JFO pp ff 02,+i ghQ s¢ C! O+.ol U h Q 2341 WU ` L; bcp• brE § , FEZ x m 4S I£f! f ,4S'!F£f 3„86,8SOON I 4. W g goo el I , W, 4n Poi s w' g C N w c=0i m vuyi El n l I Zp a az ,V?' AO i Ell., rn N,,z , J,"., rrl 3Qgv. woo z z o F+1 z o G Z z8-- Gr ; o ti 2, W i ata.,rc w Zz t- P i nt n I omo was o Y. h°u $g x xN,' ; a SO'SZF! _ I .SO'SZ£I I 34; p o c tio«g o <^_ oLLz O.JlY9),0!"C59Z 3.Str,£b.0-0M1' 9Lw1aagarcY ~ F4rrl z Wz f3 z u o I T 1 U a :Z U LL,' N NR a J TA: U ON J NOT ax 3 e-nOi v,3 r 0 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) 86rg ,r I m 2 a 4 flilliN. 1Axai - S 6 = m o a u€ 5a h_. U zzcc D WD OO.Oooy y ?f C`jfa',d m a € co.., d-.1-` p m4N -z o a mr-'q r- f 3 .{ 71— Ca20) Fimn. z "' Caa_aVa u a I 1F m ra r( r I lll 3 N s g4 a3J o)A75[9t x_zan.ws J0 p,",,,..._..`" Y ti 1097E t II p `'` j, i t a La g I ON N ON . 0 ON °s I JE. 2' 4 a 57 0' 50.0' I so.o' 50.0' J W m _ 207.00' 01'73'42.W _ ° p tt1 1775.00'92.0' 6;i. W i 57.6. A. J A ti IF O J 63 4' 1 A.",4 Z G C j 1 aN o1 8 41 N I 89.0 wI 76.5' Q. g I Z Io °J+ o O • I z'a s m o m I Ln C z. 4J 89.0' 76.5' 1 I sz IC611O 1 NI yr a CO Z m O a w 4) gs . a O I N I a ,-1,<,3,; s a U 89.0' 1 69.5' '"'/In w Jm I 1.11 G' p t o p c fit• N GIN O CO e o a 55.0' 55.0' 55.0' 55.0' I 66.3' z N s oi wV 1 94.T and 28 SS JIY G- I M U ILI G, re. Yl d D o ''''P o r muNOoacoSa0a_IN 0 O mo o ` a O o o O o o ON ®: vJ z 0 a\ of J s+ N s ea. Z i 1I-. trig m I z tO i! Op.• 1\ N / is 1 cNwI,i OF7 h J /. I-- t, Iry 3_734,99.00N ,SL'902 9 /" l rt j o ° r G O G ° o ° o G" I ' o 1 N o s s o q,' 1n; Z n N I^ 0-- O OBD 0°C?°i9 G ONS r.--).. N ®I ' n i I“i'V p4Ey°*vnG o r r ^ Om Z 1 I' LLQ J . ..._.. 20' REAR 8S.7.L rni IG a.r'pir,' .5' to f+' 1 I-- 60.0' I S6A__ 560' 56.0' r In m= z.z j- 1_ 60.0'-`_I\ I?<s0oZo HW 0'''it Z F• Z I I y U Ig-c, JpU441 wU Lit,- I i uzg f r.m C W u naGzzzUoI4•J OHmss-' r-,. Inv n ' 9. c._ Z aIg 14m w,nnMn9,iW ° fa).--,. Tj --_ o'4n I tl w a g UUUUV ZjiI ; N G0a tS V oa AGENDA ITEM #7. b) 114.% 6)j 1: ', d S:-. i A:' AI' N7 i r i. ,q 1 1ev'NO o 6_ 1 N n L3yF I Uo got -4 Wo{ a b W HPso an-1—tacA oi ei;c1— D, 0 ,d.:27 ii-i z ra 6+3/I.Cf Lr/ar;?;iv'r t'i jO 0.00.f wf 4 ¢ 4 Sa'Ana r e 0 N ZA LLP', ,o!o N o _ c=ivv w; CM1 w, a E nti.rsc o uirue, $42 v ti:-.,-4-.E7.774,,,,,.-..,4_ c t y„ oak' g U Q f tco i {rT.' v..''; j/ aa' <tet T-,2:','' x 0 Z s. z1 1 ,- ,_ - G`-•i-__ G0_ 9, ! Vii_ F, ' Y @q j a. e. I' 3 t q h -0,..'r" w U i g O 2.- 390 ,!_r-2---cel 2.i, xi ,---..e_ / ,/ f`,C, i 8rc S @ 6 M s..,.'1-! 5,1.!' }"3 I U z 1 Cr.f.0 -kg:4 G.J. 2 — "..// ti ':'.."--.Z., ' 51. o ir// ~ tea, r x o U e' 9' 1 m te -y[2 N i I tL 2' "-Vie.,. '. / r—" a: ., - t a 8 W ct&Rnc ct YsY 1 { h i CO 47?-------_-1 1 \ --, t `' J. iii.?'- ---- v,-.:1., vtY 11 o No lc c,,,- u..1 i,„,k- P••••--`":, .,5''' ._.,--•,_,:- ____:,, 1:10., T' tr. 's, --jaw* ..)---,:ir,.---;:-,,'- i, 1-4116 40,OPC -------/:.-''';'Y I , - o H o h' rj SF 1 7'......• tom' zO4L„,_.„1 I.600' 1 'i 91.116V3133N,1.i1?J3d0tid ttt i O{T I , L fY i j— V LI+ O ¢ r 1orr0. n:i 1 j I`Z•":.q",<I''' v,»o Lp 7g f U E. 'A' d e WNRcnoa s F 1:-z 03 1 ;? Ks I z'6d l; H N `)f =I w 3W,1r3n35Y3 6'3 I 1 i1 N I I O.. C V inn UImD1W W 3 2 2 I .< °. F W t5 il n 01J QU by, Y' F> AGENDA ITEM #7. b) C V V• •'r t1 M a G OUU WP- O .. V _ yO 1.,,A a E'c g 5 m , u U M oQCNV.6 2 n T . V O S PU 1— n - CgO U•CrU ` 17 G- O -I O ' U ryry CD d01cua Jl O O R. u a U V U O u omac 4,- 8a$ 8 ! rlr, a 3N v s4r, .c 176 ,:-° a u 'S.:I V 11:_': r QO of ? O UCO o • ao b0pn_ Y y 0 0 7,1 :-1 c6 3 . 3 a o °7 X o = 'g e o ° aa j - : W 2 -0 U. uU — - v-'4'.—LI'.D) GziiU3I 1 0P-4 ti _ J. ° p n' o iC od w7 vN3C o aw V uou0.E00 = 5;;;.2t h = 7 m O = _ 0.16 ce c_ 2 Ho ,. co a. c. R u Ao ^•v ic c Q a e a- _ - Vsc _ 13'.5•g m0, ii, d 0 w 2 3 E AGENDA ITEM #7. b) 111-11,A;44 22 Z t( E. \ { § vi o \ j 0.\ 2\8 \ 0 \\\ 4 P. 3-g= q % ;73 I\ ° 0.> Fu 4/ _ a _ , ,P _ , 2. .. , 92x \ // 2 $ gi3 Fi s c ; } -Q/\}\ V \ )/ 00VV 2® j±di ) \ ( 2\)2 2 \\\ 0 m \\ /) \ \ /$\\{ AGENDA ITEM #7. b) 44. 1 P4, rOild b191.VA.P, tr, f8V.3N0311M, WNOSN31X3Mb1,11.a3.1.VAI 1‘..! ',..,'•:.•: - — ---= V 1:1 qi .10181SICI 2:13M3S 4-::,‘,,;"• Vs-,` '`"" ' ' ONVeGIVAA>133)30 SOOS 1 i.`21 7:„.--i 1 '041.2 1 I i173,11I “Dig I I I 0 -,, - , ,,,!,.. a'..,-, 1,,,', ?,- ';-', '''',. ,, P;;.--- ',-•."4l'-'. L i' L ''!*' '..,,..,,.:-. .t,:,,,d,..2d i...q It,--,=.,. .;1= 2,,, r•-..1-r12,r, '-'=',1 et 1 c,,,•, ...•I ,-,; -,.., ,j,Th•,, If`,7•q.,==,.=q=1 'I 7Ii-:', ,i,:;','-',-.:i. ':'..-. 7.',' I 1 i 4., - 7.:l' 7' . ;'''-t'.7.7. 77"7-, L7 ''',.t';!``;;: .•`; . dq', ...-',.' %..;:,.. ‘---, ,,',-;' 1 il - ,...,,, •-.,;- s--. ,--,.' g4,- .-",::•2•:,•=1c, -.2 .t,-, ,,t,-,:,.. n,;2- i d..! 7 Z....... al 2 4, P.-• 2 • : I--7 1 ,I,.:;, LI,--..it'',,, 4 2I ,z7,-,.;,,' ,.!; rr r, ea,: •.,,.:::4;.,.'0, .`, , I 7.., :-Ii>' -..1' a •^4L'.- < ...1•-, 0 .:; ',-., <-*, •--,`1'_, 'ilsc- 6 ,f,r,,-.::, cc .= 41. 7- f• z z z 1 Jlc 2.',:',. 1 1 s•--. t 7''''' d ...' 7.: 710 t•;‘1 ----.'"i_ _ ''- ;I 7--- -- I „ V: 'i-is,,.5. 1 ;, --- i 4-A,\`3.- r. 4 „Li7t.,-,- i ----E• .e: sc\ 47 1 i o '.:, _ 1;?: ES-_., I.1/,';,, , L-;-; 17,.. r..,17,-. , I , : 7-''''' .,' %.,-, 1. 7 f..-'‘. I i,- ;,`-1, , :.-.,,_-k- ' ' _ -;, •! — ,-, 1 I a. Ln i CO i AGENDA ITEM #7. b) w th Denis Law Mayor December 12,2016 Community&Economic Development C.E."Chip"Vincent,Administrator Robert Wilson 21730 60th Street East Lake Tapps,WA 98391 Via email: doravin@comcast.net SUBJECT:Expiration Dates for Wilson Park 1&2 Preliminary Plats(LUA 09-140,PP,and LUA 12-013,PP,PUD) Dear Mr.Wilson, You have requested a letter from the City indicating the period of validity for the Wilson Park 1 Preliminary Plat(LUA09-140)and the Wilson Park 2 Preliminary Plat and Planned Urban Development(PUD)(LUA12-013, PP,PUD). Wilson Park 1. Renton Municipal Code allows for a period of validity of 5 years for Preliminary Plats. However,the Washington State Legislature approved an extension to the period of validity to seven(7)years for plats approved on or after January 1, 2008 and before January 1, 2015. Wilson Park 1 Preliminary Plat was approved by the Hearing Examiner on August 16,2010 and because of the extension provided by the Washington State Legislature,was valid for a total of seven(7)years, until August 16, 2017. In addition,the applicant requested a one-time one- year extension to the preliminary plat,as provided for in Renton Municipal Code. This extension for Wilson Park 1 was granted on July 26,2015. Therefore,Wilson Park 1 Preliminary Plat is valid for a period of eight(8)years and will expire on August 16,2018. Wilson Park 2. Renton Municipal Code allows for a period of validity of 5 years for Preliminary Plats,and allows for applications submitted with the preliminary plat to expire at the same time as the preliminary plat. In addition,the Washington State Legislature approved an extension to the period of validity to seven (7)years for plats approved on or after January 1, 2008 and before January 1,2015. Because the Wilson Park 2 Preliminary Plat and PUD was approved by the Hearing Examiner on July 5,2012, both approvals are valid for a total of seven(7)years, until July 5,2019. The Final Plat and Final PUD must be submitted prior to the expiration of the preliminary approvals. Please also note that the Renton Municipal Code allows for the applicant to request an additional one-year extension if requested at least 30 days prior to expiration and provided the applicant demonstrates that he/she has attempted in good faith to submit the final plat within the approved time period. If you have further questions, please feel free to contact me at 425-430-7286 or jhenning@rentonwa.xov. 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98057. rentonwa.gov AGENDA ITEM #7. b) December 12,2016 Page 2 Sincerely, Jennifer T. Henning,AICP Planning Director cc: Chip Vincent,CED Administrator Brianne Bannwarth,Development Engineering Manager Vanessa Dolbee,Current Planning Manager Jan Illian,Plan Reviewer f C:\Userslsmirante\AppData\LocallMicrosoft\Windows\Temporary Internet Files`Content.Outlook\LAOR7PID\Wilson Park I f 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98057 . rentonwa.gov AGENDA ITEM #7. b) 1 Cynthia Moya From:Phil Olbrechts <olbrechtslaw@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, May 22, 2018 8:35 PM To:Jason Seth Cc:Cynthia Moya Subject:Re: Request For Extension Thank you for the information. Please forward this email to the Wilsons and Jennifer Henning, cc'd to all remaining parties of interest (Wilsons or Henning) and myself. If you are unable to acquire an email for the Wilsons, please let me know and I will make other arrangements for addressing the extension request. Parties (Wilsons and Henning): I am in receipt of the May 3, 2018 Wilson request for extension of preliminary plat expiration and the May 22,2018 response to that request. I do not see any requirement in the Renton Municipal Code to hold a hearing for this type of request. If any party believes that a hearing is required, please let me know. In the absence of a hearing mandate we have some flexibility on how to process the extension request. If either party wishes to have a hearing on the request, I will order one held. If both parties are fine relying upon the written materials submitted thus far, I will give the Wilsons an opportunity to submit a written reply to the City's May 22, 2018 response and base my ruling upon the May 3, 2018 extension request, the May 22, 2018 City response and the Wilson's reply. If the parties have some other preference as to how to proceed I am certainly willing to consider alternatives. Please let me know of your preference on how to proceed by 5:00 pm, May 28, 2018 by email to all the parties of this email as well as the Wilsons. If I don't receive any preferences by the May 28, 2018 due date I will set a due date for a Wilson reply and subsequently issue a ruling on the extension request. On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 10:07 AM, Jason Seth <JSeth@rentonwa.gov> wrote: Phil, I received this letter requesting an extension on a short plat application. CED and the Attorney’s office would like to discuss it with you. Thank you, -Jason Jason Seth, CMC City Clerk City of Renton 425-430-6502 jseth@rentonwa.gov AGENDA ITEM #7. b) 2 This communication may be subject to public disclosure laws of the State of Washington (RCW 42.56). AGENDA ITEM #7. b) April 1, 2010 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON Minutes OWNER/APPLICANT: Robert Wilson 21703 60th Street East Lake Tapps, WA 98391 CONTACT: Shupe Holmberg Baima & Holmberg Inc. 100 Front Street Issaquah, WA 98027 Wilson Park Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA 09-140, PP, ECF LOCATION: 720 South 55th Street SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Applicant is requesting approval of a Preliminary Plat for the subdivision of 2.5 acre parcel to encompass 12 lots and 3 tracts for open space. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Development Services Recommendation: Approve subject to conditions. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REPORT: Staff Report was delivered to the Hearing Examiner on March 9, 2010. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Development Services Report, examining available information on file with the application, field checking the property and surrounding area; the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES The following minutes are a summary of the March 16, 2010 hearing. The legal record is recorded on CD. The hearing was opened on Tuesday, March 16, 2010, at 9:32 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of the Renton City Hall. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. AGENDA ITEM #7. b) Wilson Park Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA-09-140, PP, ECF April 1, 2010 Page 2 Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing the original application, proof of posting, proof of publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No. 2: Vicinity Map Exhibit No. 3: Preliminary Plat Map Exhibit No. 4: Boundary/Topography Map Exhibit No. 5: Generalized Utilities/Drainage/ Control/Conceptual Grading/Landscaping Plan Exhibit No. 6: Road Profile Exhibit No. 7: Wall Profiles & Cross Sections Exhibit No. 8: Tree Inventory Exhibit No. 9: Zoning Map Exhibit No. 10: Administrative Policy/code Interpretation Affecting Urban Separator Overlay Regulations, effective January 14, 2010 Exhibit No. 11: Street Modification Letter, dated November 10, 2009 Exhibit No. 12: Plat Map Showing All Zoning Designations Exhibit No. 13: Map Showing Urban Separator Areas in the Talbot Area of Renton Exhibit No. 14: Generalized Utilities and Drainage showing the Retaining Walls Exhibit No. 15: Planter Strips for Sidewalks Exhibit No. 16: Large Sheet Showing Most Recent Drainage and Grading Plan with the Retaining Walls Exhibit No. 17: Right of Way Papers for 55th Street Exhibit No. 18: Existing Easement Document for the Smithers Emergency Access Roadway Exhibit No. 19: Aerial Photo of Existing Area Exhibit No. 20: Going Native Brochure The hearing opened with a presentation of the staff report by Jennifer Henning, Current Planning Manager, Community and Economic Development Division, City of Renton, 1055 S Grady Way, Renton, Washington 98057. The proposed project is a 2.5 acre site, the nearest access street is South 55th Street. The access street is very steep and has several serpentines with a speed limit of 25 MPH. This site has been constrained by trying to get access to it due to the steep slopes. There also have been some difficulties due to City Code because of the Urban Separator Overlay and all the various zoning designations. The final plat has gone through several revisions to meet all requirements, this presentation today has 12 lots suitable for the development of single-family residential homes. There are three open space tracts, Tracts B, C, and D. There is no Tract A. Tract B is greater than a 40% slope and as such is a protected area that cannot be touched. Tracts C and D are open space areas and are split by the zoning designation. R-1 zone is on the west side and R-8 zone is on the east. All open spaces are considered reserved areas and would be planted with trees by the applicant. AGENDA ITEM #7. b) Wilson Park Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA-09-140, PP, ECF April 1, 2010 Page 3 Part of Lot 12, to the north is within the R-1 zone, a portion of this lot would have an easement overlaying it to be considered open space that satisfies the Urban Separator requirements. It is not a separate Tract, but an area that will have an easement over the top. The remainder of the lots in the plat are between 4,500 and 6,270 square feet. There is a lot of topography on the lots and in order to develop the lots there would need to be some retaining walls constructed. The walls would vary in size from 12-20 feet in height. One retaining wall would be located on the eastern border of Lot 7 and the other would be located on the western border of Lot 12. The retaining wall on the east side would be either poured concrete or soil nail composition; the wall on the west side would be poured concrete or stabilized soil. The walls abutting the property both to the north and the west will have some impact to the property owners at least during construction and perhaps during maintenance. The applicant has been required to secure both construction and maintenance easements. The plan is to terrace those walls and landscape them, it has been requested by Staff that those walls be maintained by the Homeowner’s Association. The applicant would like to see the individual homeowners maintain the walls in their particular lot. The Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of Non-Significance – Mitigated with eleven mitigation measures. No appeals were filed. The project is compliant with both Zoning Code and the Comprehensive Plan policies. The density of the proposed plat is 7.99 dwelling units per acre. All lots comply with the minimum width and depth. The plat would be accessed via a new street that would extend from S 55th Street. It would be a 50-foot right-of- way and enters into the plat, makes a curve and becomes S 53rd Place. It eventually ends in a “T” that will eventually extend to the north and south property lines with a gated emergency access at the south property line. All on-site roads will be dedicated rights-of-way. Because of the restraint in this plat, it would be required to have sidewalks and planting strips on one side of the roadway. The sidewalk and planting strip would be located along the west side of the street coming into the plat. There also would be a sidewalk and an 8-foot wide planting strip on the north side of South 53rd Place. The planting strip would be 5 feet wide along the north/south interior road. A tree inventory plan has been submitted, currently there are 101 trees on site, of those 25 must be retained. The applicant has stated that they can only retain 15 trees. The applicant has proposed 60 trees to be planted primarily in the open space areas (Tracts C and D as well as the open space area that is part of Lot 12). Staff has asked for a split rail fence to define these areas. A goal of the Urban Separator is to create corridors of open space for wildlife to roam through. There are only two areas of the City where the Urban Separator applies, the Talbot Hill Area and May Creek. In Talbot, the Urban Separator slices through the hill and takes just portions of the property and this is why Lot 12 has been designed with the open space that will be surrounded with a split rail fence. Police and Fire have indicated that there are sufficient resources to serve this area. The project is located in the Renton School District and they do have sufficient room for the projected new students. This project would be subject to School Impact Fees. AGENDA ITEM #7. b) Wilson Park Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA-09-140, PP, ECF April 1, 2010 Page 4 There have been some letters sent to the City of Renton concerning the safety on S 55th Street and the new driveways that would be taking access onto that street. A safety evaluation was done and it was determined that the roadway was safe based on a higher speed than what is currently allowed on S 55th Street. A drainage report was completed and showed that the parcel to the east drains onto this site and runoff from this site flows to the west into Geneva Court, this flow collects in a drain and flows into the storm system located in the road inside Geneva Court and finally flows into Springbrook Creek. The drainage vault for this project would be located under the roadway with an easement for maintenance. The opening to the vault would not be located in the roadway, but placed into the landscaping or sidewalk areas adjacent to the vault. There has been vandalism where the grates have been removed which creates a grave traffic safety issue. Water service would be provided by Soos Creek, the Certificate of Water Availability has been issued for this site. Sewer service would be provided by the City of Renton with a minimum 8-inch diameter extension required. The public streets would become part of the City System with the exception of the emergency access road. It was requested that a 9th Condition be added indicating that the grate covering the drainage vault be located in the sidewalk or the landscaping. A 15 Minute Recess was taken. The Hearing Resumed at 10:31 am. Shupe Holmberg, 165 NE Juniper Street, Issaquah 98027 stated that if the proposed plat is approved subject to the recommended Staff conditions they believe that the public’s interest in safety and welfare would be met. Condition #5 calls for the Homeowner’s Association to maintain the retaining walls. It would appear to the applicant that the individual homeowners should maintain those walls within their own respective lots. That would involve Lot 7 and 12. The Drainage and Grading plan that was shown today is not the latest version. The north wall would still be a 5- foot high retaining wall. On the east portions of Lots 4-7 there would be two staged rockeries that would be 2 to 6 feet in height with the highest part being at the north end. The retaining wall on the west side is the same on both plans. The retaining wall on Lot 12 would be approximately 20-feet tall. There would be a fence on top of the 20-foot wall. Since the 20-foot wall does cover several parcels, it might be best if the Homeowner’s Association would maintain that particular wall. In the drainage report it does state that the runoff from the site currently runs through Geneva Court. The proposal for this site is to pick up the drainage, pipe it to the detention vault within the off-site roadway and discharge that to the roadside ditch on S 55th Street. Any drainage impacts to Geneva Court would be lessened, no drainage from this site would go to Geneva Court. The 2009 King County Stormwater Manual would apply to installation and operation of the vault. Each individual lot will have a connection and drainage would be piped directly to the conveyance system. AGENDA ITEM #7. b) Wilson Park Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA-09-140, PP, ECF April 1, 2010 Page 5 The emergency access to the site would be paved. Some cut and grading will take place along the road and adjacent lots. Vincent Geglia, 11410 NE 124th St., Ste. 590, Kirkland 98034 stated he had an aerial photo of the site and surrounding areas. The new public road off of S 55th Street to the site was pointed out showing that the new interior road, S 53rd would hit just on the outside corner of the curve giving the optimum sight distance looking in both directions on S 55th. The site distance does meet the City of Renton requirements. Paul Witt, 617 S 53rd Pl, Renton 98059 stated that he lives in Geneva Court, Lot 13. He is not opposed to this project, but does want to make sure that any project in the area is done correctly and safely. This is a challenging project, from his front porch up to the far side of this new site, it is over 110-feet in difference. His concern is to make sure that the retaining walls along the west side are done correctly, he still feels a little vague about exactly what materials are being used to create these retaining walls. He was further concerned about the terminus and vagueness of how far the wall at his corner lot would continue. Going into his back yard and looking up, there would just be a 20-foot wall going straight up, how is that going to look. At that location, the road would be above grade. That roadway could be prone to accidents especially in the snow and ice. He would prefer to see the maintenance kept with the Homeowner’s Association, it sounds great on paper, however, in reality it most likely will not get done. It seems strange to have a Homeowner’s Association responsible for something built on City property. The vault that they are responsible for is not on any property they have vested interest in, it is on a City right-of-way on a dedicated street. It would stand to reason that the engineering would be strong enough to hold large vehicles. Steven Beck, 4735 NE 4th Street, Renton 98059 stated that he is the manager of Amberwood LLC and consultant for Wilson Park Preliminary Plat before the Hearing Examiner today. Lots 4, 5, 6, and 7 to the east will have a rockery on their site. He was involved with the Cherie Lane plat several years ago and recently brought plans to a meeting showing how rockeries and vegetation was handled in the Cherie Land. It was not pretty. They did not want that on this site, so everywhere they can, even on the west side to try to step up and do rockeries and vegetation, it looks much better and is better for the environment. On Lots 4, 5, 6, and 7 where there is approximately a 120-foot depth, the plans include a garage under a two story basement with decks off the main floor. These plans were used in Cherie Lane and worked very well. With that house plan, the back yards can be tiered up with 4-6 foot rockeries at a time and use vegetation on them. Lot 12, they have discussed how to do that, possibly sloping the hill up slowly to the building pad. If a wall is used, it would have to be textured or soil nail used, but the end product would have to look good. Kayren Kittrick, Community and Economic Development stated that Geneva Court has a north connection, a small bit of right-of-way that was reserved for future use. Rockeries four feet and over must be structurally engineered. They require a separate building permit and a separate inspection, there is a special inspection required with a structural engineer on site at the time of the inspection. AGENDA ITEM #7. b) Wilson Park Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA-09-140, PP, ECF April 1, 2010 Page 6 The Examiner stated that the road is pretty much at the south end of the retaining wall leaving no room to create terraced or sloped retaining walls. Ms. Kittrick stated that her concern is that could be a focal point for erosion, she will instruct her staff to pay particular attention to that area. If the wall stops right there, something will have to be placed there to protect the area. The wall and transition would be required to meet building standards. S 55th ideally would be required to have sidewalk, curb and gutter. The problem is that is a third party property and therefore if there were to be any improvements through there it should be associated with designs to accommodate what may be developed on that property. There have been inquiries on that property and it will happen at some time. It is also possible that S 55th should be something that the City is looking at as a general overall plan as opposed to putting it on each individual property. They are not prepared to do that today, but it is on their agenda. Road A will either be called Smithers or Morris, it has not been determined as yet. The preference at this point is to call it Smithers. The north/south connection from S 53rd to S 55th will be subject to traffic and building requirements. The sidewalk is situated next to the slope and will require a pedestrian level barrier or guard rail of some type. There is a possibility that the school bus may pick up children on S 55th that has not been established as yet. The drainage with the walls must meet the 2009 Manual requirements. The vault would be located in the dedicated right-of-way and the grate would be placed outside the traffic right-of-way. The sewer line would run down S 55th Street. Because of the protected area on Lot 12, they can only clear 35%. It seems it may be complicated to build the wall, do the grading and remain at less than 35%. They will also need the permission of Mr. Witt and any other neighbors prior to building this retaining wall. Her opinion is that the maintenance of that particular retaining wall should be spread over the whole group in a Homeowner’s Association. That particular wall on Lot 12 is in essence holding the entire plat in place. It might have to be in an easement where all the property owners have an undivided interest, which may be stronger than putting it on the Homeowner’s Association. There could be a possibility of flipping Lot 12 and making the open area next to the retaining wall rather than the house. Mr. Holmberg stated that he had a Geotech engineer present, but did not have a structural engineer in the room today. The Examiner asked if this wall could be built without disturbing the properties to the west. Permission would be needed to shore it up as it is being built or the piles being driven from the top for the soldier walls and then doing what was necessary. Mr. Holmberg stated that technically they could build the wall on Lot 12 with no off-site easements. It would be a fill behind the wall. It will have impacts on the four lots in Geneva Court because it is going to be a large wall in their backyard. They did look at putting the building area on the west side of Lot 12, there was less of a building envelope doing it that way, but they could revisit that possibility. It could also be a condition that they work with the homeowners of Geneva Court to try to address some of the visual impacts of that wall. AGENDA ITEM #7. b) Wilson Park Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA-09-140, PP, ECF April 1, 2010 Page 7 They are proposing larger lots in this development because of the retaining walls and rockeries that are necessary because of the steep slopes. Lot 12 is a difficult lot. Moin Kadri, 19213 Kenlake Place NE, Kenmore 98028 stated the soil investigation that was done found the soil in that area to be a glacial till and generally has a fairly high sheer strength. If the foundations are built on that native material that can withstand the bearing capacities and even a retaining wall. The report has options for three different types of retaining structures, in this type of environment, taking care of drainage is very important. The Examiner stated that he had some concerns with the retaining wall, its length and height and its affect on the properties to the west as well as supporting anything built on Lot 12. He may impose another condition for Lot 12, in that if it can be built it can be built, but it may actually yield to the Urban Separator. These are steep slopes and adjoin other people’s property, there are a lot of things involved in making sure it is done safely without jeopardizing anybody on this site or adjacent sites. Ms. Henning checked on the requirements for a Hillside Subdivision. Lots are required to be larger than the minimum size. Erosion control, grading and Geotech information seem to be the criteria. This is a difficult site, the applicant has been very responsive in working with the City. The remaining concerns would be how clearing would be accomplished on Lot 12 in order to preserve the number of trees required and accommodate all the improvements. There will be export from the site which does not seem to be severe. The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak, and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 11:36 a.m. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATION Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicant, Robert Wilson, filed a request for an approval of a Preliminary Plat for the subdivision of a 108,884 square foot (2.5 acre) parcel in the R-1, R-8 and R-14 zones and in the Urban Separator Overlay. The original proposal encompassed 13-lots and 4-tracts (for open space and storm detention). The revised proposal encompasses 12-lots and 3-tracts (for open space). 2. The yellow file containing the staff report, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. 3. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the City's responsible official issued a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated (DNS-M). 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. 5. The subject site is located at 720 South 55th Street. The subject site is located north of 55th and does not front directly on that street. The subject site is east of Talbot Road South and is generally south of AGENDA ITEM #7. b) Wilson Park Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA-09-140, PP, ECF April 1, 2010 Page 8 Valley Medical Center and directly south of the eastern portion of the Sikh Temple site. An existing home is located on the eastern end of the parcel. That home would be removed if the plat is approved. 6. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of a variety of residential uses ranging from low density to medium density uses, but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the Plan. 7. The subject site is currently zoned R-1 (Single Family - 1 dwelling unit/acre), R-8 (Single Family - 8 dwelling units/acre) and R-14 (medium density - 14 units/acre). The R-14 portion is only about 10 feet wide. 8. The subject site is also subject to the Talbot Road Urban Separator Overlay requiring preservation of a corridor of open space. The overlay is located near the westernmost portion of the subject site and is the portion zoned R-1. It is approximately 23,795 square feet. An Administrative Interpretation found that only 50 percent of the area defined by the urban separator rather than 50 percent of the entire site should be restricted to open space use. 9. The subject site was annexed to the City with the adoption of Ordinance 3268 enacted in December 1978. 10. The subject site is approximately 2.49 acres or 108,884 square feet. The rectangular subject site is approximately 207 feet wide (north to south) by 510 feet long. The southwest corner of the subject site is approximately 290 feet north of South 55th. 11. The subject site slopes downward over 110 feet from approximately 370 feet in the northeast corner of the site to approximately 254 feet at its western boundary. The slopes range from 13 percent 39 percent with an area exceeding 40 percent east of the southwest corner of the site. Slopes exceeding 40 percent are designated as protected slopes. 12. The site's sloped topography means the site falls within the definition of a Hillside Subdivision. Larger lots and decreased density are permitted in Hillside Subdivisions. 13. The applicant proposes grading the subject site to create building pads for homes as well as appropriate grades for roads to and through the site. The applicant proposes approximately 17,000 cubic yards of cut and approximately 6,000 cubic yards of structural fill. 14. The tree inventory showed 101 significant trees on the subject site. Code requires the retention of 25 trees whereas the applicant proposes retaining 15 trees. The replacement ratio is six (6) trees for each one removed that should have been retained. Sixty new trees would be planted mainly in the open space corridors. Additional street trees would be required 15. Access to the subject site would be provided via a new public roadway that connects S 55th with the subject site across a neighboring, third-party property. This south to north roadway would be paved to a width of 26 feet and have an eight foot planter strip and a 5 foot sidewalk on its west side. It would connect to a new roadway, Road A, through the site that would curve to the east and end in a T- intersection with another north-south road, Road B. This Road B would extend to the north and south AGENDA ITEM #7. b) Wilson Park Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA-09-140, PP, ECF April 1, 2010 Page 9 property lines. The north leg would eventually connect to properties north of the subject site. The south leg would connect to a secondary, gated emergency access easement that connects to S 55th. The emergency road would have 20 feet of paving. Road A, the main road through the site would have a public right-of-way 42 feet wide and would continue the sidewalk on its north side. A modification to reduce Road A to less than 42 feet was denied. 16. The applicant proposes dividing the subject site into 12 lots and 3 tracts (labeled Tracts B, C and D - there is no Tract A). The three tracts are located south of Road A as you enter the plat from the west, followed by Proposed Lots 1, 2 and 3. Proposed Lots 4-7 are located along the eastern edge of the plat, east of Road B. Proposed Lots 8-12 are located along the north side of Road A. Tract B would encompass the critical slopes. Tracts C and D would be open space areas. As initially proposed the eastern portion of Proposed Lot 12 would be an open space easement as it is governed by the Urban Separator overlay. 17. The lots would range in size from 4,500 square feet to 13,006 square feet. Most of the lots would be between 5,400 square feet and just under 6,000 square feet. The different zones have different development standards. Proposed Lots 1 - 11 are subject to the R-8 standards. Proposed Lot 12 is subject to the R-1 standards. There are actually no lots subject to the R-14 standards. Staff noted that the proposed lots appear to meet the appropriate zoning standards. 18. The applicant proposes installing a number of rockeries along the north and east side of the plat to terrace the lots and provide more level building pads or yard areas. These rockeries will vary in height. The initial plans show them as 5 and 6 foot rockeries. 29. The applicant proposes a tall retaining wall along the western boundary of the subject site adjacent to the four (4) lots of the adjacent Geneva Court Plat. The wall will be twenty (20) feet tall. Walls or rockeries will also be provided along the entry road from S 55th to provide suitable grades for a road in the steeper slopes. 20. Construction of walls or rockeries along property lines may require cooperation and even construction easements from adjoining property owners. The applicant cannot enter upon or injure neighboring properties without legal consent. The ERC imposed conditions to address the visual impacts of the large retaining structures. 21. The three zoning districts each have their own density standards and staff calculated that they all comply with their underlying standards. The overall density for the plat would be 7.99 dwelling units per acre after subtracting sensitive areas and roadways. 22. The subject site is located within the Renton School District. The project is expected to generate approximately 5 or 6 school age children. These students would be spread across the grades and would be assigned on a space available basis. The proposal is subject to the Renton School Impact fee. 23. The development will increase traffic approximately 10 trips per unit or approximately 120 trips for the 12 single family homes. Approximately ten percent of the trips, or approximately 12 additional peak hour trips will be generated in the morning and evening. AGENDA ITEM #7. b) Wilson Park Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA-09-140, PP, ECF April 1, 2010 Page 10 24. There was concern about traffic and sight distance issues where the plat's access road intersects S 55th. Accidents along this roadway have been reported, including a fatality. The traffic analysis indicated that there is adequate sight distance on this area of the curving, hilly street. S 55th and the access to the plat may be impaired in inclement, snowy weather. 25. Stormwater from the east drains onto the subject site and then west toward Geneva Court where it is collected and conveyed to 53rd and Talbot. This stormwater will be collected on the subject site and conveyed to an off-site detention vault located under the western roadway that connects the plat to S 55th. The project will have to comply with the 2009 King County Stormwater Manual. 26. Sewer service will be provided by the City. 27. Water service will be provided by the Soos Creek District. CONCLUSIONS: 1. While the division of the subject site into additional lots appears to serve the public use and interest, the twelve lot plat is excessively dense. The proposed plat attempts to maximize the density limitations of the subject site and it does so by sacrificing too much of the natural terrain of the property, particularly, the area designated by the Talbot Urban Separator Overlay. Not only does it sacrifice the natural slopes but it would impose a huge 20 foot tall retaining wall on its neighbors creating an aesthetic blight in the rear yards of four separate homes. Rather than blend this plat's terrain with its western neighbors, it creates an obstacle to neighborliness. Staff calculated that the plat would achieve a density of 7.99 dwelling units per acre. That certainly approaches the permitted density of 8 dwelling units per acre, the upper range, of the R-8 including what should be an R-1 dwelling where the lot size is ordinarily one (1) dwelling unit for an over 43,000 square foot area. The Hillside Subdivision regulations suggest reducing densities on steeper properties. The comprehensive plan suggests making use of the natural contours of a site rather than substantially altering them. The applicant will be substantially altering the grades and slopes of a majority of the property, particularly the easternmost lots. It will also be substantially altering property on either side of the new road connecting the site to S 55th. It does not serve the public use and interest to further alter or damage the natural contours along the westernmost, Urban Separator portion of the property, in addition to the other alterations necessary to develop this otherwise substantially constrained parcel. Proposed Lot 12 and Road A are proposed to occupy too much of what should be protected property. Eliminating Proposed Lot 12 will also reduce the potential issues of a 20 foot wall holding up a large area of slope behind the existing Geneva Court homes. Proposed Lot 12 should be eliminated from the plat and its natural features and slope preserved. 2. An eleven lot plat will serve the public use and interest even though it will still substantially alter the terrain of the site and require engineered rockeries or walls along the road and easternmost lots. It will create eleven new parcels that can provide additional housing choices for residents of the City. It apparently can be served by urban services including domestic water and sewer and storm water. It appears that the stormwater can be contained or controlled by inline systems and an off-site vault under the new road. The access to the subject site might preclude access during inclement weather but it is not the only area subject to such constraints as hilly terrain and steeper roads are the only means of accessing certain parcels. Staff reviewed the traffic report and it appears that while the new access road will be steep it can meet engineering standards and its intersection provides reasonable sight distance for AGENDA ITEM #7. b) Wilson Park Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA-09-140, PP, ECF April 1, 2010 Page 11 all turning directions. 3. The applicant will be providing mitigation fees to offset some of its impacts on emergency services, traffic, parks and schools. The development of eleven new lots should also increase the tax base of the City. The provision of Road B, the eastern north-south road will provide secondary access for emergency vehicles to the south and a potential connector to the north so that if additional development occurs north of the subject site through access might be available on public roads. A sign should be installed warning potential residents that Road B might be a through road with additional traffic in the future. 4. The Zoning, Comprehensive Plan and Urban Separator all recognized that this site would have additional development potential. The development of the subject site will obviously increase traffic on a steep, serpentine road. It will also introduce what should be short-term construction noise and impacts as well as the permanent additional impacts of an increased population on a parcel which now only supports one home. 5. In conclusion, while the development of the subject site was envisioned by the City's Zoning and Policies, the site is also severely constrained by topography and access limitations. Reducing the density by one lot will not unduly limit development of the site, still provide additional housing choices and also retain some of the natural features that the comprehensive plan and the urban separator intended to protect. Reducing the density by one lot will also protect neighboring properties from severe disruption along their eastern boundaries and protect them from an unsightly 20 foot tall wall. RECOMMENDATION: The City Council should approve an ELEVEN LOT plat of the subject site subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the Determination of Non-Significance – Mitigated that was issued by the Environmental Review Committee on February 22, 2020 for Project File No. LUA-09-140, ECF, PP. 2. The applicant shall apply for a demolition permit, remove the existing residence and complete final inspections of the demolition prior to plat recording. 3. A Native Growth Protection Easement (NGPE) shall be recorded over all of Proposed Lot 12 and Tracts B, C, and D and Lot 12 shall be eliminated. The edge of the NGPE shall be delineated with a split rail fence and identified with signage as approved by the Planning Division project manager. A fencing and signage detail shall be submitted to the Planning Division project manager for review and approval at the time of construction permit application. The fencing and signage shall be installed prior to recording the final plat. 4. The applicant shall be required to plant replacement trees as indicated on Exhibit 8 prior to recording of the final plat. 5. The applicant shall establish a Homeowners Association for the maintenance of the NGPE and the AGENDA ITEM #7. b) Wilson Park Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA-09-140, PP, ECF April 1, 2010 Page 12 stormwater vault and each home shall have an undivided interest in the western retaining wall or walls along the road and if Lot 12 is ultimately approved provide the appropriate documents for the review and approval of the Planning Division project manager prior to recording of the final plat. 6. A note shall be placed on the face of the plat which indicates that Lots 3 and 8 shall be oriented to take access from proposed Road A. 7. The applicant shall place signs at the northerly terminus of proposed Road B which alert future property owners that this road may be extended to the north should future development warrant such an exte4nsion. These signs shall be installed prior to recording of the final plat. 8. The applicant shall obtain any necessary construction and maintenance easements for the retaining walls and the stormwater vault subject to review and approval by the City Attorney. 9. The grate covering the drainage vault shall be located either in the sidewalk or the landscaping. 10. All retaining wall, rockeries and transitions shall meet the building standards. ORDERED THIS 1st day of April 2010. FRED J. KAUFMAN HEARING EXAMINER TRANSMITTED THIS 1st day of April 2010 to the following: Mayor Denis Law Dave Pargas, Fire Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer Larry Meckling, Building Official Julia Medzegian, Council Liaison Planning Commission Gregg Zimmerman, PBPW Administrator Transportation Division Alex Pietsch, Economic Development Utilities Division Jennifer Henning, Development Services Neil Watts, Development Services Stacy Tucker, Development Services Janet Conklin, Development Services Marty Wine, Assistant CAO Renton Reporter Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 100Gof the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m., April 15, 2010. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. AGENDA ITEM #7. b) Wilson Park Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA-09-140, PP, ECF April 1, 2010 Page 13 An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 110, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of $250.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. An appeal must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m., April 15, 2010. If the Examiner's Recommendation or Decision contains the requirement for Restrictive Covenants, the executed Covenants will be required prior to approval by City Council or final processing of the file. You may contact this office for information on formatting covenants. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. AGENDA ITEM #7. b) PUBLIC City of Renton Department of Community and Economic Development HEARING PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: PUBLIC HEARING DATE: March 15, 2010 Project Name: Wilson Park Preliminary Plat ApplicantlOwner: Robert Wilson; 21703 50th Street East; Lake Tapps, WA 98391 Contact: Shupe Holmberg; Baima & Holmberg Inc., 100 Front Street; Issaquah, WA 98027 File Number., LUA09-140, PP, ECF Project Manager., Gerald Wasser, Associate Planner Project Summary: The applicant is requesting approval of a Preliminary Plat for the subdivision of a 108,884 square foot (2.5 acre) parcel in the R-1, R-8 and R-14 zones and in the Urban Separator Overlay. The original proposal encompassed 13 -lots and 4 -tracts (for open space and storm detention). The revised proposal encompasses 12 -lots and 3 -tracts (for open space). A portion of proposed Lot 12 would also contain an open space easement. A proposed stormwater vault would be located under the proposed access road. Proposed lots range in size from 4,500 to 1.3,006 square feet with a density of 7.99 dwelling units per acre. The proposed lots are intended for the future construction of single family residences. Slopes generally range from 13`Yo to 39% and the southwestern portion of the site contains a small area of protected slopes (over 40%). Access to the proposed lots would be via a new street off of South 55th Street; a secondary access for emergency vehicles is also proposed. Grading would involve approximately 17,000 cubic yards of cut with approximately 5,000 cubic yards used as structural fill. Approximately 500 cubic yards of crushed rock fill would be used for road construction. Project Location: 720 South 55th Street Project Location Map LUA09-140, ECF, PP AGENDA ITEM #7. b) City of Renton Community and Economic lopment Deportment P inary Report to the Hearing Examiner WILSON PARK PRELIMINARY PLAT LUA09-140, PP, ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE March 36, 203 Page 2 of 13 B. HEARING EXHIBITS: Exhibit 1: Project file ("yellow file") containing the application, reports, staff comments, and other material pertinent to the review of the project. Exhibit 2: Vicinity Map (date stamped 10/16/09) Exhibit 3: Preliminary Plat Map (Baima & Holmberg Inc., Sheet 1/1, revised 01/11/10) Exhibit 4: Boundary/Topography Map, (Baima & Holmberg Inc., Sheet 1/5, revised 01/11/10) Exhibit 5: Generalized Utilities/Drainage/Control/Conceptual Grading/Landscaping Plant (Sheet 2/5, revised 01/11/10) Exhibit 6: Road Profile (Baima & Holmberg Inc., Sheet 3/5, revised 01/11/10) Exhibit 7: Wall Profiles & Cross Sections, (Baima & Holmberg Inc., Sheet 4/5, revised 01/11/10) Exhibit 8: Tree Inventory, (Baima & Holmberg Inc., Sheet 5/5, revised 01/11/10) Exhibit 9: Zoning Map (Sheet 13, East %) Exhibit 10: Administrative Policy/Code Interpretation affecting Urban Separator Overlay Regulations, effective January 14, 2010 Exhibit 11: Street Modification letter, dated November 10, 2009 C. GENERAL INFORMATION. 1. Owner of Record: Richard Wilson 21703 601h Street East Lake Tapps, WA 98391 2. Zoning Designation: Residential —1 du/ac (R-1); Residential — 8 du/ac; Residential —14 du/ac (R-14); Urban Separator Overlay 3. Comprehensive Plan Designation: 4. Existing Site Use: 5. Neighborhood Characteristics: North: East: South: West: 6. Site Area: D. HISTORICAL/BACKGROUND: Action Land Use File No. Annexation N/A Comprehensive Plan N/A Zoning Code N/A E. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1. Utilities: Residential Low Density (RLD); Residential Single Family RSF); and, Residential Medium Density (RMD) Single-family home Vacant (R-1, R-8, and R-14 Vacant (R-4) Vacant and Single Family Home (R-1, R-8, and R-14) Single Family Residential Plat (Geneva Court, R-14) 2.49 acres (108,884 gross square feet) Ordinance No. 3268 5099 5100 Water: Water service is provided by Soos Creek Water and Sewer District. Date 12/13/78 11/01/2044 11/01/2004 LUA09-I40, ECF, PP AGENDA ITEM #7. b) City of Renton Community and Economic Development Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner WILSON PARK PRELIMINARYPLAT LUA09-140, PP, ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE March 16, 2010 Page 3 of 13 Sewer: Sewer service is provided by City of Renton. An 8 -inch diameter sanitary sewer is required to be extended to serve the site. Surface Water/Storrn Water: Storm conveyance is City of Renton. 2. Streets: All streets are within the City of Renton. 3. Fire Protection: City of Renton Fire Department F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE: 1. Chapter 2 Land Use Districts a. Section 4-2-020: Purpose and Intent of Zoning Districts b. Section 4.2.070: Zoning Use Tables c. Section 4-2-110: Residential Development Standards d. Section 4-2-115: Residential Design and Open Space Standards 2. Chapter 4 Property Development Standards a. Section 4-2-030: Development Guidelines and Regulations 3. Chapter 6 Streets and Utility Standards a. Section 4-"60: Street Standards 4. Chapter 7 Subdivision Regulations a. Section 4-7-080: Detailed Procedures for Subdivision b. Section 4-7-120: Compatibility with existing Land Use and Plan — General Requirements and Minimum Standards c. Section 4-7-1.50: Streets — General Requirements and Minimum Standards d. Section 4-7-170: Residential Lots — General Requirements and Minimum Standards e. Section 4-7-220: Hillside Subdivisions S. Chapter 9 Procedures and Review Criteria 6. Chapter 11 Definitions G. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: 1. Land Use Element: Residential Low Density; Residential Single Family; Residential Medium Density 2. Community Design Element: Natural Areas; Urban Separators; New and Infill Development: Site Planning; 3. Environmental Element: Storm Water; Steep Slopes, Landslide, and Erosion Hazards H. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1. Project Description/Background The applicant proposes subdividing an existing 2.49 acre parcel (APN 312305-9125) into 12 lots suitable for the eventual development of detached single family homes and 3 tracts for open space. The resulting parcels would range in size from 4,500 to 13,006 square feet. In addition, the applicant is also LUA09-140, ECF, PP AGENDA ITEM #7. b) Citrof Renton Community and Economic opment Deportment P nary Report to the Hearing Examiner WILSON PARK PRELIMINARY PLAT LUA09-140, PP, ECF PUBLIC NEARING DATE March 16, 2020 Page 4 of 13 proposing that 4,884 square feet of proposed Lot 12 (which is within the Talbot Urban Separator) be designated as a Native Growth Protection Easement. The site is comprised of three zoning classifications: 27,156 square feet in the Residential -1 dwelling units per acre zone (R-1) ; 79,343 square feet in the Residential — 8 dwelling units per acre (R-8) zone; and, 2,384 square feet in the Residential —14 dwelling units per acre (R-14) zone. In addition, the Talbot Urban Separator Overlay is present and corresponds to the R-1 zoning in the western portion of the site. Overall density of the 12 -lot proposal on the site would be 7.99 dwelling units per acre. Primary access to the site would be via a 50 -foot wide access easement from South 55th Street. This access easement is approximately 300 -feet in length and accesses the westerly portion of the site and is identified as "Road A" on the revised site plan. A secondary emergency access on the easterly side of the property is also proposed via a 30 -foot wide access easement and continues to the northerly property line. This access is identified as "Road B" on the Preliminary Plat plan. A stormwater detention vault is proposed off-site and to be located under proposed Road A. The applicant is proposing grading involving 17,000 cubic yards of cut with a pproximately 6,000 cubic yards of it being used as structural fill material with the remainder to be exported. In addition, approximately 500 cubic yards of crushed rock fill would be imported to the project site for road construction. An existing single family residence (3,520 square feet) would be demolished to accommodate the proposed development. Because average slopes are in excess of 20 percent this project is considered a hillside subdivision. 2. Environmental Review Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43.21C, 1971 as amended), on Feb 22, 2010, the Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of Non -Significance Mitigated (DNS -M) for the Wilson Park Preliminary Plat. A 14 --day appeal period commenced on February 26, 2010 and ended on March 12, 2010. No appeals of the threshold determination were filed as of the writing of this staff report. 3. Compliance with ERC Conditions Based on an analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, the Environmental Review Committee ERC) issued the following mitigation measure with the Determination of Non -Significance — Mitigated: 1. The applicant shall place a note on the face of the plat which requires a 15 -foot building setback line from the top of slopes which are 40% or greater. 2. The applicant will be required to comply with the recommendations contained in the Geotechnical Engineering Study, prepared by Liu & Associates, Inc. dated February 20, 2009. 3. The applicant shall clearly mark and fence trees outside the construction area and replant exposed ground as soon as possible after construction activities. 4. That the applicant shall provide a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Plan designed pursuant to the 2005 Department of Ecology's Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements and provide staff with a Construction Mitigation Plan prior to issuance of construction permits. LUA09-140, ECF, PP AGENDA ITEM #7. b) City of Renton Community and Economic Deveoopment Deportment Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner . WILSON PARK PRELIMINARY PLAT LUA09-140, PP, ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE March 16, 2010 Poge 5 of 13 S. Weekly reports on the status and condition of the erosion control plan with any recommendations of change or revision to maintenance schedules or installation shall be submitted by the Project Engineer of record to the Public Works inspector. 6. Grading and foundation activities shall be conducted during the dryer months of the year from April 1 through October 31 unless otherwise approved by the Development Services Division. 7. The final drainage report and design shall be subject to the 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual. 8. The applicant shall be required to pay a Parks Mitigation Fee based on $530.75 per each new single family lot prior to recording the final plat (with credit given for the existing house). The fee is estimated to be $5,838.36. 9. The applicant shall be required to pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee based on $75.00 per each new average daily vehicle trip associated with the proposed project prior to recording of the final plat (with credit given for the existing house). The fee is estimated to be $7,895.25. 10. The applicant shall be required to pay a Fire Mitigation Fee based on $488.00 per each new single family Jot prior to recording the final plat (with credit given for the existing house). The fee is estimated at $5,368.00. 11. The applicant shall submit a sample board indicating the texture and tinting to be used on all visible surfaces of retaining walls for the review and approval of the Planning Division project manager prior to the issuance of construction permits. 4. Staff Review Comments Representatives from various departments have reviewed the application materials to identify and address issues raised by the proposed development. These comments are contained in the official file, and the essence of the comments has been incorporated into the appropriate sections of this report and the Departmental Recommendation at the end of the report. 5. Consistency with Preliminary Plat Criteria Approval of a plat is based upon several factors. The following preliminary plat criteria have been established to assist decision -makers in the review of the plat: a) Compliance with the Comprehensive Plan Designation The site is designated Residential Low Density (RLD), Residential Single Family (RSF), and Residential Medium Density (RMD) on the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. The proposal is consistent with all of the following Comprehensive Plan Land Use policies: Policy CD -1. Integrate development into natural areas by clustering development and/or adjusting site plans to preserve wetlands, steep slopes, and notable stands of trees or other vegetation. Natural features should function as site amenities. Use incentives such as flexible lot size and configuration to encourage preservation and add amenity value. Policy Objective Met 0 Not Met Policy CD -22. During land division, all lots should front streets or parks. Discourage single tier lots with rear yards backing onto a street. Where a singie-tier plat is the only LUA09-140, ECF PP AGENDA ITEM #7. b) City of Renton Community and Economic Iopment Department P inary Report to the Hearing Examiner WIMN PARK PRELIMINARY PLAT LUA09-140, PP, ECF PUBLIC NEARING DATE March 16, 2010 Page 6 of 13 viable alternative due to land configuration, significant environmental constraints, or location on a principal arterial, additional design features such as larger setbacks, additional landscaping, or review of fencings should be required. a. Evaluation of land configuration should consider whether a different layout of streets or provision of alleys is physically possible and could eliminate the need for a single -tier plat. b. Evaluation of environmental constraints should consider whether the location and extent of critical areas prevents a standard plat design. c. Review of fencing should ensure that the development does not "turn its back" to public areas. Policy Objective Met Not Met Policy CD -25. Streets, sidewalks, and pedestrian or bike paths should be arranged an interconnecting network. Dead-end streets and cul-de-sacs should be discouraged. A grid or "flexible grid" pattern of streets and pathways, with a hierarchy of widths and corresponding traffic volumes, should be used. Policy Objective Met Not Met Policy CD -26. Interpret development standards to support plats designed to incorporate vehicular and pedestrian connections between plats and neighborhoods. Small projects composed of single parcels and/or multiple parcels of insufficient size to provide such connections, should include future street stubs. Future street connections should be clearly identified to notify residents of future roadway connections. Policy Objective Met Not Met Policy EN -28. Minimize on-site erosion and sedimentation during and after construction. Policy Objective Met Not Met Policy EN -71. Allow land alteration only for approved development proposals or approved mitigation efforts that will not create unnecessary erosion, undermine the support of nearby land, or unnecessarily scar the landscape. Policy Objective Met Not Met Policy LU -156. Residential Low Density areas may be incorporated into Urban Separators. Policy Objective Met Not Met Policy EN -28. Minimize on-site erosion and sedimentation during and after construction. Policy Objective Met Not Met 6j Compliance with the Underlying Zoning Designation The subject site is designated R-1, R-8, and R-14 on the City of Renton Zoning Map. The proposed development would allow for the future construction of 12 new single-family dwelling units. Density: The density permitted in the R-1 zone is a maximum of 1 dwelling per net acre du/ac). The density range in the R-8 zone is a minimum oof 4.0 up to a maximum of 9_0 du/ac. The density range in the R-14 zone is a minimum of 10.0 and a maximum of 14.0 du/ac. Net density is calculated after public rights -of way, private access easements, and LUA09-140, ECF, PP AGENDA ITEM #7. b) City of Renton Community and Economic Development Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner WILSON PARK PRELIMINARY PLAT LUA09-140, PP ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE March 16, 2010 Page 7 of 13 critical areas are deducted from the gross acreage of the site. The net acreage of the R-1 area of the property is 0.3882 acre (23,795 sf — 5,927 sf of road area and 958 sf of steep slope area = 16,910 sf or 0.3882 ac); the net acreage of the R-8 portion of the property is 63,277 sf or 1.4526 ac (80,632 sf —17,355 sf of road area = 63,277 sf or 1,4526 ac); and the net acreage of the R-14 area of the property is 2,094 sf or 0.0481 acre (2,384 sf — 290 sf of road area= 2,094 sf or 0.0481 acre). The overall net density for the project is 7.99 du/ac. Lot Dimensions: Twelve lots and three tracts are proposed. The minimum lot size required in the R-1 zone is 1 acre or 10,000 sf for cluster developments; minimum lot width in the R- 1 zone is 75 -feet for interior lots and 85 -feet for corner lots and the minimum depth is 85 - feet. The minimum lot size in the R-8 zone is 4,500 sf for parcels greater than one acre in size; the minimum lot width in the R-8 zone is 50 -feet for interior lots and 60 -feet for corner lots. No lots are proposed in the R-14 portion of the property. As proposed and demonstrated in the table below, all lots meet the requirement for minimum width. Lot Area (s4. ft.) Width/Depth (ft. 1 Notes 1 4,594 63/75 R-8 Zone; abuts open space Tracts B &D 2 4,500 60/75 R-8 Zone 3 5,896 80/75 R-8 Zone; corner lot 4 5,993 50/120 R-8 Zone 5 5,979 50/120 R-8 Zone 6 5,964 50/120 R-8 Zone 7 5,782 57/120 R-8 Zone; future road connection to north 8 6,269, 70/90 R-8 Zone; corner lot 9 5,400 60/90 R-8 Zone 10 5,400 60/90 R-8 Zone 11 5,404 60/90 R-8 and R-1 Zones 12 73,006 (net lot area 8,122) 108/90 Ft. R-1 Zone; includes 4,884 sq. ft. of open space B 958 N/A I Steep Slope Open Space Tract C 4,195 N/A Open Space Tract D 2,900 N/A Open Space Tract Setbacks: Proposed Lots 1 -11 are subject to the setback requirements of the R-8 Zone. Lot 12 is entirely within the R-1 Zone, and is, therefore, subject to R-1 setbacks. None of the proposed lots are subject to the requirements of the R-14 zone. R-1 zone setback requirements are a minimum of 30 -feet front yard, 15 -feet side yard and 25 -feet rear yard. R-8 setback requirements are a minimum of 15 -feet for the primary LUA09-140, ECF, PP AGENDA ITEM #7. b) City of Renton Community and Economic . lopment Department P inary Report to the Nearing Examiner WILSON PARK PRELIMINARY PLAT LUA09-140, PP, ECF PUBLIC NEARING DATE March 16, 2010 - Page 8 of 13 structure and 20 -feet for attached garages in the front yard, 5 -feet side yard and 20 -feet rear yard. As proposed, all lots appear to contain adequate area to provide all required setback areas. Compliance with building setback requirements would be reviewed at the time of building permit review. The applicant has indicated that the existing residence on portions of proposed Lots 2, 3, 8, and 9 would be removed. Since the existing house is within the area of several proposed lots and the Road 8, the house will need to be removed prior to recording. Staff recommends as a condition of approval, that the applicant apply for and obtain a demolition permit, remove the existing residence, and complete final inspections of the demolition prior to plat recording. Building Standards:_ The R-1 and R-8 zones permit one residential structure per lot. Each of the proposed lots would support the construction of one detached single family home/ Building height in the R-1 (Lot 12) and R-8 zones (Lots 1 - 11) is limited to 30 feet. The maximum lot coverage in the R-1 Zone (Lot 12) is 35% percent; while the maximum impervious lot coverage in the R-8 Zone is dependent on the lot size. For lots greater than 5,000 square feet (Lots 3 - 11) 35% lot coverage or 2,500 sq. ft. is permitted, whichever is greater; for lots less than 5,000 sq. ft. (tots 1 and 2) 50% lot coverage is permitted. it appears that all of the proposed parcels contain enough area to accommodate single family residential homes that comply with the lot coverage requirements. The building standards for proposed lots would .be verified at the time of building permit review. Proposed Lot 12 contains an open space easement which would be recorded as a part of the Native Growth Protection Easement (NGPE) recommended in this report. d) Community Assets Landscaping: The applicant will be required to provide landscape strips along the internal roads where street trees shall be planted. Proposed Road A within the plat would require an 8 -foot landscape strip between the street and the sidewalk along the north side of the street. The off-site portion of Road A will also require an 8 -foot planter strip between the street and the sidewalk. Proposed (toad B is required to have a 5 -foot planter strip landscaped with street trees. The applicant has submitted a tree inventory and tree retention worksheet which indicates that there are 101 trees on the site. A total of 25 trees must be retained and the applicant is proposing to retain 15 of these trees_ The replacement ratio is six, 2 -inch caliper trees per tree removed. The applicant is proposing to provide 60 replacement trees. The majority of these replacement trees are proposed to be planted within the Urban Separator Area (R-1 zoning) which encompasses the eastern portion of proposed Lot 12, and Tracts B, C, and D. Staff recommends as a condition of approval that a Native Growth Protection Easement (NGPE) be recorded over the eastern portion of Lot 12 and Tracts B, C, and D. The edge of the NGPE shall be delineated with a split rail fence and identified with signage as approved by the Planning Division project manager. A fencing and signage detail shall be submitted to the Planning Division project manager for review and approval at the time of construction permit application. The fencing and signage shall be installed prior to recording the final plat_ In order to ensure that the proposed open space area would be provided with vegetation enhancement, staff recommends as a condition of approval that the applicant be required to plant replacement trees as indicated on Exhibit 8. Staff further recommends as a condition of approval that the applicant establish a Homeowners LUA49-140, ECF, PP AGENDA ITEM #7. b) City of Renton Community and Economic Development Department Preiiminory Report to the Nearing Examiner WILSON PARK PRELIMINARY PLAT LLiA09-140, PP, ECF PUBLIC NEARING DATE March 16, 2010 Page 9 of 13 Association which would be responsible for maintenance of the open space areas within the plat. Open Space: The R-1 zoned portion of the property coincides with the Talbot Road Urban Separator Overlay. RMC 4-3-110 identifies two Urban Separator Overlay areas in the City: the May Valley Urban Separator and the Talbot Road Urban Separator. In the May Valley Urban Separator, entire properties are included in the Urban Separator designation. However, in the Talbot Road Urban Separator only portions of properties are within the Urban Separator. Urban Separators are intended to create contiguous open space corridors within and between urban communities, which provide environmental, visual, recreational and wildlife benefits. The purpose of the Urban Separator is also to protect resources and environmentally sensitive areas. Properties located within Urban Separators are required to dedicate 50 percent of the designated gross area of the property as open space. For properties in May Valley, where entire properties are within the Urban Separator, this is appropriate. However, for properties in the Talbot Road area, where only portions of the sites are within the designated Urban Separator, the requirement for dedicating 50 percent of the area as open space is a hardship. By requiring 50 percent of the area designated as Urban Separator to be dedicated as open space, there is uniformity and fairness between the Talbot Road and May Valley Urban Separator areas. An Administrative Policy/Code Interpretation which became effective on January 14, 2010 states that properties in the Talbot Urban Separator will be required to dedicate 50 percent of the gross land area in the Urban Separator as open space, rather than 50 percent of the gross site area. The area to be dedicated may also include portions of the site abutting the Urban Separator. The area of the project site within the Talbot Road Urban Separator (R-1 zone) is 23,795 sf. Using the Administrative Policy/Code Interpretation cited, above, the applicant would be required to dedicate 11,898 sf of open space. The applicant proposes to provide 12,937 sf of open space (958 sf in Tract B, 4,195 sf in Tract C, 2,900 sf in Tract D, and 4,884 sf in the open space easement as part of proposed Lot 12). e) Compliance with the Subdivision Regulations Streets: Access to the site would require the dedication of a new public street across an abutting property. This street would 26 -feet of paving, an 8 -foot planter strip and a 5 -foot sidewalk. A secondary emergency access across the abutting property to the southeast is required. This emergency access would be gated and is required to have 20 -feet of paving. Residential Blocks: RMC 4-7-160A states that blocks shall be wide enough to accommodate two tiers of lots, except where the location and extent of environmental constraints prevent a standard plat land configurations including size and shape of the parcel. In addition, prior the approval of a single tier of lots, the applicant must demonstrate that a different layout or provision of an alley system is not feasible. The site contains environmental constraints including limited access, steep slopes, and narrow underlying lot width which preclude a double tier of lots or an alley configuration. Furthermore, the applicant initially proposed a different lot layout, with more parcels, and redesigned the plat to conform to the multiple underlying zone classifications and the Urban Separator Overlay. Staff supports the current lot layout. The parcels are ,uniform in size and shape. Lots: The proposed lots are generally rectangular in shape and conform to Code requirements in terms of minimum size and width_ Proposed Lots 3 and 8 would be corner lots and frontage has been determined to be on proposed Road A. Staff recommends as a LUA09-140, ECF, PP AGENDA ITEM #7. b) City of Renton Community and Economic . lopment Department P inary Report to the Nearing Examiner WIL50N PARK PRELIMINARY PLAT LUA09-140, PP, ECF PUBLIC NEARING DATE March 16, 2010 Page 10 of 13 condition of approval that proposed Lots 3 and 8 front on proposed Road A and, therefore, a note shall be placed on the face of the plat prior to recording. D Reasonableness of Proposed Boundaries: Access: Each of the proposed lots and tracts would have access to a public street. The applicant has proposed to extend a new 42 -foot wide public street from South 55` h Street. This street would have 26 -feet of paving, an 8 -foot planter strip, a five-foot sidewalk, curb and gutter along the westerly side of the street. This street would require off-site dedication. Within the plat, Road A would be a 42 -foot wide right-of-way consisting of 26 feet of paving, with and 8 -foot wide landscape strip and 5 -foot wide sidewalk fronting proposed Lots 8 —12. The sidewalk and planting strip would be located on only on the north side of the street fronting Road A. Improvements proposed on proposed Road B fronting Lots 4 — 7 consist of a 5 -foot wide sidewalk and a 5 -foot wide sidewalk and a 5 -foot wide planting strip along the east side of proposed Lot 8. improvements for proposed Road B would end at the northern property line. Staff recommends as a condition of approval that the applicant place a sign at the northern terminus of proposed Road B that alerts future property owners that this road may be extended to the north should future development warrant such an extension. Emergency secondary access would be provided via an emergency vehicle access extending from the southeast terminus of Road 'B' (near Lots 3 and 4) to South 55'h Street. This emergency access would require 20 -feet of pavement. Property owners to the west have expressed concern about the installation of new roads to the proposed project. They are concerned about appropriate setbacks, easements and fences along property lines. Additionally, these property owners are concerned about safety on these roads in inclement weather. The surrounding property owners also suggest a concrete barrier wall for cars travelling southbound (downhill) on proposed Road A. The applicant must address all appropriate City of Renton road safety issues at the time of construction. The property owners to the west are also concerned about traffic on S 551h Street which is serpentine and slopes downward from east to west in the vicinity of the proposed project. While it is acknowledged that vehicle accidents have occurred in this area on S 55th Street, the Traffic Study submitted with the application materials indicates that sight distances at the proposed access point for the proposed project are adequate. This has been verified by City staff. Topography: The site contains areas of protected slopes (greater than 40 percent) in the southwestern portion of the property. The Environmental Review Committee imposed a mitigation measure which requires the applicant to place a note on the face of the plat that requires a 15 -foot building setback line from the top of slopes which are 40 percent or greater. The applicant has indicated proposed retaining walls along the westerly side of proposed Lot 12 (within the R-14 portion of the property) and through proposed Lots S, 6, and 7. These walls range in height from 12 to 20 -feet in height. The retaining wall on the easterly side of the property would be poured concrete or soil nail composition. The retaining wall on the westerly side of the property would be poured concrete or reinforced earth. Because the height of these proposed walls may cause visual impacts to adjoining property owners to the west and northeast, the Environmental Review Committee imposed a mitigation measure to require a combination of texturing and tinting on all visible surfaces LUA09-140, ECF, PP AGENDA ITEM #7. b) City of Renton Community and Economic Development Department Preliminary Report to the Nearing Examiner WILSON PARK PRELIMINARY PLAT LUA09-140, PP, ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE March 16, 2010 Page 11 of 13 of the proposed retaining walls. Because proposed retaining walls would be in close proximity to property lines, staff recommends as a condition of approval that the applicant obtain any necessary construction and maintenance easements for the retaining walls and the stormwater vault. Property owners to the west of the project site have expressed concern about appropriate engineering of the proposed project so that the properties below the site are not compromised by increased danger of landslides or run-off. The Geotechnical Engineering Study prepared by Liu & Associates, Inc., dated February 20, 2009 and the Technical Information Report prepared by Baima & Holmberg, Inc., dated May 5, 2009 address these issues and present recommendations to avoid such consequences. Relationship to Existing _Uses: Single-family residences abut the project site to the west and south with vacant land to the north and east. The detached single-family residences would be compatible with the surrounding development. g) Availability and Impact on Public Services (Timeliness) Police and Fire: Police and Fire Prevention staff indicated that sufficient resources exist to furnish services to the proposed development. Due to limited access staff recommends, as a condition of approval, any future residence constructed within the plat shall be sprinkled unless the requirement is removed by the City of Renton Fire Marshal or his/her designee. A note shall be recorded on the face of the short plat to this effect. The proposal would add new residential units to the City that would potentially impact the City's Police and Fire Emergency Services. Staff recommended through SEPA Environmental Review as a condition of approval to mitigate for these impacts that requires the applicant to pay a Fire Mitigation Fee, based on $488.00 per new single-family residence payable prior to recoding of the final plat. The fire mitigation fee is estimated to be $5,386 (11 new units x $488.00 = $5,386.00) Schools: The project site is served by schools in the Renton School District. It is anticipated that the Renton School District can accommodate any additional students generated by this proposal at the following schools: Benson Hill Elementary, Nelsen Middle School and Lindbergh High School. School impact fees are regulated under RMC 4-1-160 and are in effect at the time of permit application or final plat approval. Currently, the Renton School District required fee is 6,310.00 per each new single-family residence; however, school mitigation and impact fees are updated annually and are subject to change. Surface Water: The applicant submitted a Technical Information Report for Wilson Park, prepared by Baima & Holmberg, Inc. dated May 5, 2009. That report includes an analysis of upstream tributary drainage which states that the parcel to the east drains onto the site. The Level I Downstream Drainage Analysis in the report states that runoff from the site flows west into lots in the adjacent Geneva Court development. The majorities of these flows collect in a drain constructed along the back yards of the western -most lots of the Geneva Court development and then flow into the storm system in South 53rd Place. This flow collects in a stormwater pond/bioswale facility located at the intersection of Talbot Road S and South 53`d Place approximately 750 -feet downstream from the site. This facility outfalls through an 18 -inch pipe to the west side of Talbot Road S into a poorly defined channel flowing into the woods. The flows then pass through a 12 -inch culvert under a walking path and continue to flow west to a wooded wetland area more than a quarter LUA09-240, ECF, PP AGENDA ITEM #7. b) City of Renton Community and Economic opment Deportment Pr )cry Report to the Nearing Examiner WILSON PARK PRELIMINARY PLAT LUA09-140 PP, ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE March 16, 2010 Page 12 of 13 mile downstream from the site. Flows into the ditch along S 551" Street continue west in a rock lined channel along the north side of the street to the intersection of Talbot Road S and S 55`h Street. The channel is eroded and shows signs of flowing into the street. Flows from the ditch along Talbot Road S collect in the storm system about 850 -feet downstream from the site eventually flowing into Springbrook Creek at about 1,800 -feet downstream from the site. Springbrook Creek continues flowing west to about one-half mike downstream of the site where it enters a box culvert crossing SR 167. The Technical Information Report indicates that there are no apparent drainage problems. The plans submitted by the applicant indicate that a proposed storm water detention vault would be located off-site in the easterly proposed access road to control downstream stormwater impacts. The Environmental Review Committee imposed a mitigation measure that requires the final drainage report shall be subject to the 2004 Icing County Surface Water Design Manual. Property owners to the west have expressed concern about changes in drainage due to impervious surfaces created by the proposed project. The applicant proposes to install a stormwater vault within the off-site portion of proposed Road A. Additionally, the applicant would be required to use the 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual in the final drainage report. Water: The applicant proposes to serve the subject subdivision with a public water supply and distribution system managed by the Soos Creek Water and Sewer District. A Certificate of Water Availability, dated November 7, 2008, has been issued by the Soos Creek Water & Sewer District. The applicant will show, during engineering review, the location and distance of all existing fire hydrants within 300 feet of the site. Existing and new hydrants will be required to be retrofitted with Storz "quick disconnect" fittings, if not already in place. Furthermore, the Fire Department requires that all new houses be sprinklered. Sewer: The site is within the City of Renton sewer service area. A minimum 8 -inch diameter sanitary sewer extension is required to serve the site. Streets: The streets within the proposed project would be dedicated public streets and would become part of the City's street system. Improvements required on these streets are described ion the Access section, above. As indicated in that section, the neighboring property owners are concerned about how street safety issues would affect them. The Traffic Study prepared by Traffex, dated June 23, 2004 cites accident history in the project vicinity on South 551h Street between 98th Avenue S and 99t11 Place S. A total of four accidents occurred between January 1, 2004 and December 31, 2008. Two of the accidents were injury accidents with one of them being fatal. None of the accidents occurred at the curve on South 551h Street where the site access is proposed. The Traffic Study indicates that sight distances are adequate for the curves in the vicinity of the proposed project. The adequacy of sight distances has been verified by City staff and has been found to be appropriate for the proposed plat LUAC9-140, FCF, PP AGENDA ITEM #7. b) city of Renton Community and Economic Development Department Preliminary Report to the Nearing Examiner WILSON PARK PRELIMINARY PLAT LUA09-140, PP, ECF PUBLIC NEARING DATE March 16, 20I0 Page 13 of 13 G. RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends approval of the Wilson Park Prellminary Plat, Project File No. LUA09-140, PP. ECF) subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the Determination of Non -Significance — Mitigated that was issued by the Environmental Review Committee on February 22, 2010 for Project File No. LUA09-140, ECF, PP. 2. The applicant shall apply for a demolition permit, remove the existing residence and complete final inspections of the demolition prior to plat recording. 3. A Native Growth Protection Easement (NGPE) shall be recorded over the eastern portion of Lot 12 and Tracts B, C, and D. The edge of the NGPE shall be delineated with a split rail fence and identified with signage as approved by the Planning Division project manager. A fencing and signage detail shall be submitted to the Planning Division project manager for review and approval at the time of construction permit application. The fencing and signage shall be installed prior to recording the final plat. 4. The applicant shall be required to plant replacement trees as indicated on Exhibit 8 prior to recording of the final plat. 5. The applicant shall establish a Homeowners Association for the maintenance of the NGPE, the stormwater vault and the retaining walls and provide the appropriate documents for the review and approval of the Planning Division project manager prior to recording of the final plat. 6. A note shall be placed on the face of the plat which indicates that Lots 3 and 8 shall be oriented to take access from proposed Road A. 7. The applicant shall place signs at the northerly terminus of proposed Road B which alert future property owners that this road may be extended to the north should future development warrant such an extension. These signs shall be installed prior to recording of the final plat. 8. The applicant shall obtain any necessary construction and maintenance easements for the retaining walls and the stormwater vault subject to review and approval by the City Attorney. EXPIRATION PERIODS: The Preliminary Plat approval will expire 5 years from the date of approval. An extension may be requested pursuant to RMC Section 4-7-080.1_. LUA09-140, ECF, PP AGENDA ITEM #7. b) EXHIBIT 2 r .a : A3 5 F`$•a a}' er s' 4 ei ` a r _ S tg ° Bei a! ° o 1i1 b0t,1 C x '• - -- l J rn. E PPS w ^ a y , jIy ;4 Q 0 - 3htl: rr..F c w . i1.1 uj s "- a x • -.T. r.--- H166K " .''F .a, SJ.i Q m 1 c J yypp4tK of 5C'—. /!? . To 'id s g.7 K x 41(D g ar8q m cd 1 pV 4 I = , • p * e 4 y, ,' ' it 4 rYI,.. F.. y 6 I` g c9 jj p_ .^-- Ir GL4 DC7 11 a' zW1 k?7-T101*i p Fl m K - F n - y srw:7- ;ruoauoa ldaa AGENDA ITEM #7. b) W LO Y MO Z Za ch 0 N F— CD ZZ Q SE L)3 id 0 LL Z W tl M y uj T f y L V O Z 99O IL r : 1_ ElLqkfille a oarnc faa nl A,z wlc ri,os 104IC lq I E, &g r3I ------I I 1Gi Fb88 ' Ao' y A09C .Po9i -------- AM f BIZ+Lv enx air Mr' Jt„8 X41,' EXHIBIT 3 x arrmr J I f a Y ELS W LO Y MO Z Za ch 0 N F— CD ZZ Q SE L)3 id 0 LL Z W tl M y uj T f y L V O Z 99O IL r : 1_ ElLqkfille a oarnc faa nl A,z wlc ri,os 104IC lq I E, &g r3I ------I I 1Gi Fb88 ' Ao' y A09C .Po9i -------- AM f BIZ+Lv enx air Mr' Jt„8 X41,' J I f° X41,' J I i bmf w oro yf ra,. mljLOx 4 ea BBF 3_f*-8G.Owr 1 V L-, E IilVd HQS'IUYI 'w oH,*' AGENDA ITEM #7. b) g}g} If EXHIBIT 4 W1 1 11 6 _ Fq I Rtla ppj` ySg b6@ R' 3 2 Affil"cak i9 fide x E.. os v•ah" f2rmJyolataEt rfit'uns4.-------_'.- -------- n E ce r T- ---__ -- - _itm1-=~~~ _- M.,- 7 Wim. --=- rcr - _ "•: i:w co jjj "'.SSS -- .tI 1 • R.'8 '.' 1 _ / ,.L i Fir __C. __ - 'y9j- S ' r • j-M. Lu o ar. TILp .---------- -- - m J . as ' pa ii` C r i .e I Lu qkf - - 1- _ cb•^- __# ,•'F J iv_ ice_.--__ _P`l'9,y-- -•WY_ 'I !/ LLT_----_____ fir- Z+:r± iz p ---` - CyFt -wr 1 b `-. n,ti 't Y—y_•-_--___ _ g a Y _ oor r- ___ -,..-_ -serm - _ ---- r^ij.t I •y. .._`$ -, _-`__F Y ____ r. d f, pm a. cz _ OF -- qtr''' -- ^' Q - - ^ ------ tip µ- r T' r J _w. L12fi[9 dSAI 571 1, 1 y F_~ 74 yo-terat dtl11 1.FidV990dOJ[/ XSVClLlOB way.)IUVd NOSIIM u1r B,R •+rR AGENDA ITEM #7. b) EXHIBIT 5 R lilt I a4pl EailH k oil r i `w { `t `w ! i t j LO Z Z— '\'fol'c '1i ! . Yv-_r. t'.rr,—_...___—:, — o rf`=;•--,r t— _ J , y T_ ''a' a-ti—`------ 1 y` W = - IIIJ ar+---------- V) S 1 1 I' alc -w x w 911 0 Uri LL 0,0 ——---7i•yl _ i j i r N..S rr J r'I J I mc ri V=, iU ,.3 I - I t _ IiIi` _ r '- - -__-~" - r r r 0 41 70 as nlz^ Y _ - ^ \ 30 ` r![ i ,logBz 3"BF,B¢OON -.cr a and elm"os0NYl/Jmiavus r.er 3nm^ Ps r ' on ro-cecz 7YN.d33N00/1MH1W0=- {-'I 9 m, 3 YN11lHR 6 2J 1111 man"ap y+4 6 WIWl,T w+RB ar m a la- NUVd NOSI M rt== m w. .c... an WWF w,na.o o-:so-nsCtw\m-rnrmana AGENDA ITEM #7. b) LU C9 z Z z C9 v 8 z w0 W F— LL z OW LL w0 co U LL z 0 0 a- rer-w q q p w WAL- RSA q t i i i 4 4 FT i EXHIBIT 6 3 I 37fi aaa avoa — -- -_d MUtld MOS—IM '4 6 4LIOH,RlrB r or — AGENDA ITEM #7. b) C W rO V Z B 6 I J r' J fJ , es¢ JJ JJ i it 5 f JJ 7:2 JJJJ JJ I JJJJ-IJ JJ.iJ JJJ i JJ J J JJJJ JJJ C JJJJ JJJ JJJJ JJJ JJJ JJJJ JJJJJ._I JJJJJJ JJJJ JJ JJ JJJ JJ4J J'J JJi J JJJ _ i J 1JJJ_J JJJJJ JJZJ JJJ JJJJ JJJ ysJ JJ JJJ J JJ JJJ JJJ JJ_ JJJ U JJJJJJ a g C W rO V Z B 6 I J r' J fJ , JJ JJ 5 7:2 M JJJJJJJJJJ JJ I JJJJ-IJ JJ.iJ JJJ JJJJ 'JJJ' JJJJ JJJ C JJJ_i J J JJJJ JJ JJJJ _I l JJJJ J JJ JJU EJJJJJJ JJ JJJJJ LL O z 0 O CL B B z b 5 M C b r R9 rYRr 5 5 C b R9 r YRr 5 B B 8 T 6d7fjOi3d l7YM WVd WDS HM VWAGAMMON. T SPH g w m w wm3x 8 8 C b B B 8 T 6d7fjOi3d l7YM WVd WDS HM VWAGAMMON. T SPH g w m w wm3x 8 8 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) yy yy I rA EXHIBIT 8 FE E E 3E EEE • t'EEa<arls>`EEF 3EEEE tib do a?:2k__:kkSkL_aa•.=eR aa,:,ks.:Rk R aJ' Gia zr e Qe EEEEEFF3tom EFEEFEEEF11111glop! IoE o l \ b y titi ,y•. 1 f 7 fa 7Y.1) •af9LDZ ALifxI.I85 p 1` t `3 ^-... •` - -----, J J ! rl-.~ 1 it A „ a--- - -- • - -' /, e LU i..J n --•r'' Y - t - - a ryy ---- vim'-Mk --i'-;q. . 'z, G 1 w - '_ -_ # y . - . x• - oma' 5$ I • 8 N eor .,- - b - * Y - - mor aals 3t.wa7' - i ,' 3{• W LL- SFJ- .Pei w - J 4°! ,* _ -_ J- _SSii EL qr- 4 ® r- -_ y,\ _~ CSF _ ^ - • O{ 1' f -r- _ --__ ^- -- -'- - fes -_ - _ ---i -^_ ` 1-. '-_ -_ -.•', -`- ___.-• Pi='-- __ --_ -- ^_ ` moi^' ryp+ - -- T, y^ -- - -_ -'L-rf _- 251_ -_ __.-,-Zi~ ___ • j4tS , _ r"1 zw 3i' •' -- i - cltrrs ear xtj /1 t - -f. =T - - * - - -- ' -- - - __ - 0'882 3,Br,8t-aaK c -. a- _ fir' • t •. WM yw IAfW i ao-tasT grnd N0tLN3.L9WABOIN3hM 33UL-- = mf m = 5 7ik1Vd HQSIWI ; W ON•r7,Pg _ AGENDA ITEM #7. b) H3 - 30 T23N R5E E 1/2 IM -- EXHIBIT 9 co I IINftci9 S 1 _ _ . CO... R-14 iR-: CO co i 1to cE CarIW co-- 4t/ i ro j I CO RM -F ! 14 6.vane az __ s,wn0 aawta B s -- R-4 co COr C co CO i CO c CO W R-4 N x R -S N g sn a i R-14 ss,a s, R 1 ' t,l L R_4... 3 sw9 R-1 R-4 R-4 4 ZONING MAP.13010K J3 - Ob T22N R5E E 1/2 PW TECHNICAL SERVICES 3PRINTEDON11/13/09 I1 a 200 400 31 T23N R5E E 1/2crtraF.z in Feet f1 r I D_r .. 1:4.800 5331 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) EXHIBIT 14 City of 00000 ri 1 U") Department of Community and Economic Development Planning Division ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY/ CODE INTERPRETATION MUNICIPAL CODE SECTIONS: RMC 4-3-110, Urban Separator Overlay Regulations. REFERENCE: Wilson Park Preliminary Plat (LUA09-140, PP, ECF) SUBJECT: Determination regarding dedication of open space requirements for properties within the Talbot Urban Separator. BACKGROUND, The City received an application for a development proposal on a 2.5 acre site in the R-14, R-1, and R -S Zones. The site includes a portion of the Talbot Urban Separator, which is an overlay intended to create contiguous open space corridors within and between urban communities, which provide environmental, visual, recreational and wildlife benefits. The purpose of the Urban Separator is also to protect resources and environmentally sensitive areas. There are two Urban Separator areas: May Valley and Talbot Road. In the May Valley Urban Separator, entire properties are included in the Urban Separator designation. However, in the Talbot area, only portions of properties are within the Urban Separator, and these are generally portions of the property containing steep slopes. Properties located within the Urban Separator are required per RMC 4-3-110.E2.a to dedicate 50% of the gross land area of the parcel or parcels as a non - revocable open space tract. In May Valley, since the entire property is designated Urban Separator, the dedication of 50% of the gross site area is appropriate. However, in the Talbot Urban Separator where only a very small portion of the site is designated Urban Separator, it is inequitable to require that 50% of the gross site area be retained. JUSTIFICATION: Urban Separator regulations require dedication of 50% of designated properties gross area as open space. For properties in May Valley, where the entire site is within the Urban Separator, this is appropriate. However, for properties in the Talbot area, where only a portion of the site is designated Urban Separator, the requirement for dedication of H:\CED\Planning\Title IV\Docket\Administrative Policy Code Interpretation\CI-06\Code Interpretation.doc Page 1 of 2 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) 50% of the area as open space is a hardship. By requiring 50% of the area designated as Urban Separator to be dedicated as open space, there is uniformity and fairness between the Talbot and May Valley areas. DECISION: Properties in the Talbot Urban Separator will be required to dedicate 50% of the gross land area in the Urban Separator as open space, rather than 50% of the gross site area. The area to be dedicated may also include portions of the site abutting the Urban Separator, in order to create a contiguous open space corridor. PLANNING DIRECTOR APPROVAL: C. E. "Chip" Vincent DATE: January 14, 2010 APPEAL PROCESS: To appeal this determination, a written appeal --accompanied by the required filing fee --must be filed with the City's Hearing Examiner (1055 S. Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057) no more than 14 days from the date of this decision. Your submittal should explain the basis for the appeal. Section 4-8-110 of the Renton Municipal Code provides further information on the appeal process. CODE AMENDMENTS NEEDED TO IMPLEMENT DETERMINATIONS: RMC 4-3-110.E.2 should be amended to read as shown on Attachment A. CE -05 Page 2 of 2 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) Attachment A RMC 4-3-110.E. 2. Dedication of Open Space Required. a. Approval of a plat, and/or building permit on an undeveloped legal lot in the May Valle Urban Separator Overlay shall require dedication of fifty percent (50%) of the gross land area of the parcel or parcels as a non -revocable open space tract retained by property owner, or dedicated to a homeowners association or other suitable organization as determined by the reviewing official. Approval of a 1plat, and/or building permit on an undeveloped le al lot in the Talbot Urban Separator Overlay shall require dedication of fifly percent 50% of the gross land area of that portion of the parcel or parcels located within the Urban Separator as a non - revocable open sace tract retained by the property owner, or dedicated to a homeowners association or other suitable organization as determined by the reviewinq official. In order to satis the dedication requirement, some of the area to be dedicated may consist of land abutting the Urban Separator, as determined b the Planning Director, on a case-by-case basis. Acreage in tracts may include critical areas and/or critical area buffers._ At a minimum, open space shall be connected to another contiguous open space parcel by a fifty foot (50') corridor. b. Existing residences, existing accessory uses and structures, existing above ground utilities located in the tract at the time of designation and new small and medium utilities shall not count toward the fifty percent (50%) gross land area calculation for open space except for storm water ponds designed with less than 3:1 engineered slopes and enhanced per techniques and landscape requirements set forth in the publication the "Integrated Pond" King County Land and Water Resources Division. c. Approval of a building permit for an addition of three hundred (300) square feet for a primary use structure or five hundred (500) square feet for an accessory structure shall require recordation of a conservation easement, protective easement or tract and deed restriction on critical areas and critical area buffers located within the contiguous open space corridor pursuant to RMC 4-3-0501=4, Native Growth Protection Areas. d. Land dedicated as open space shall be located within the mapped contiguous open space corridor unless a modification is approved pursuant to subsection E6 of this Section. AGENDA ITEM #7. b) LawLDenis— F City of EXHIBIT 11Mayor Department of Communityand Economic Development November 10, 2009 Alex Pietsch, Administrator Tom Redding Bairna & Holmberg, Inc. 100 Front Street South Issaquah, WA 98027-3817 Subject: Wilson Park PreliminaryPlat— I_UA09-140 720 South 55a' Street Street Modification requests Dear Mr. Redding.: We have completed our review of your request for modifications to the street standards for the proposed Wilson Park Preliminary Plat located at 724 South S5`'' Street. The proposed residential subdivision is for 13 single family building lots and four additional tracts. Tile subdivision will be served by two access roadways south of the site to South 55th Street, connecting to a rrew street through the - proposed project. You have requested modification for the internal roadway, including eliminating the required sidewalk from one side of the street,'reducing the right-of-way width, and eliminating the requirement far a cul- de-sac. Clarification of the street improvement requirements for the two off-site access roadways is also. requested. The proposal continues to be based on a waiver of the required connection to the north property line. The request to reduce the internal street right-of-way width to 37.5 feet is denied. However, the request to delete the sidewalk from one side of the internal street is approved', subject to providing an eight -foot (8') planting strip between the street and remaining sidewalk. The requirement fora cul-de- sac is modified to allow for a hammerhead turnaround and gated emergency access for secondary access. The proposal to waive the requirement to extend the public street to the north property line is also denied. tity Cade 4-6-060 (Street Standards) requires full street improvements for all adjacent rights-of-way for, within, and dedicated by a plat. The City can modify street improvements for new plats if there are practical difficulties in carrying out the provisions of the Street Improvement ordinance. The Modification Procedures, as defined in Section 4-9-250D, clearly states the criteria for approval by the Department Administrator. In order for a modification to be approved, the Department Administrator must find that a special individual reason make's the strict letter of this'Ordinance impractical, that the modification is in conformity with the intent and purpose of this Ordinance; and that such modification: a) Will meet the objectives and safety, function, appearance, environmental protection and maintainability intended by this ordinance, based upon sound engineering judgment; and b) Will not be injurious to other property(s) in the vicinity; and Renton City Ha[I 9 i o55 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057. • rentonwa.gov AGENDA ITEM #7. b) Mr. Torre Redd"ng Wilson Park Preliminary Plat Page 2of3 , c) Conform to the intent and purpose of the Code; and d) Can be shown to be justified and required for the use and situation intended, and e) Will not create adverse impacts to other properties in the vicinity. The request to reduce the right-of-way width to 37.5 feet cannot be approved. The code allows for consideration of reduction to 42 feet in width in cases where the additional area provides for a more reasonable lot configuration. The reduction to 42 feet in width is approved, but we fail to find justification'to reduce the public right-of-way in this new residential neighborhood to a lesser standard. The request to eliminate the sidewalk along'the southerly side of the new internal roadway can be supported in this situation, provided there are equivalent value amenities provided in exchange for these improvements. This request is granted, subject to the provision of an eight- foot (8') wide planting strip, including landscaping and street trees, on the northerly side of the street with the new sidewalk. The project site will be accessed by a single public street, which requires a cul-de-sac. The proposed secondary access will mitigate the dead-end roadway configuration for emergency vehicles, but will not be available for regular vehicles and delivery trucks. The requirement for a cul-de-sac is hereby waived, subject to providing a full hammerhead turnaround in public right-of-way and emergency secondary access through an approved gated system. The function of a hammerhead turnaround will be provided with the extension of the street to the north property line, as addressed below. The proposed street design for the plat fails to meet the requirement to extend the public street system through the plat to the northerly property line. The property north of the site is large enough for future platting, and will be connected to the public street system approved for this plat. The regbirement far extension of the public street system through the proposed plat to the north property line remains. This extension is to be provided'where Lot 8 is proposed, as an extension of the easterly north -south access roadway. The street improvements required for this preliminary plat, as modified in this decision, are as follows: Westerly off-site access roadway between S. 55t St and the development site: This street section shall be in dedicated public right-of-way. The pavement width can be reduced to 26 feet (26') in width, allowing for parking on one side of the street. Curb and gutter shall be provided along the westerly edge of the pavement_ An eight -foot (8') wide planting strip shall be provided along the west side of the street, with a five-foot (5') wide sidewalk. New internal street syste.m: This street section shall be in a minimum 42 -foot width right-of-way. Additional right-of-way is also required at ail the intersections and turns in the roadway configuration. These radius dedications shall be for a 15 -foot radius. The pavement width can be reduced to 26 feet in width, allowing for parking on one side of the street. Both sides of the street shall be improved with curb and gutter. A sidewalk is not required on the southerly side of the new street. The -face of the curb shall be installed three feet (3') from the southerly edge of the right-of-way. A five-foot (5') wide sidewalk shall be provided along the northerly and "outside" portion of the new internal street, with an AGENDA ITEM #7. b) Mr. Tom Redding Wilson Park Preliminary Plat Page 3 of 3 eight -foot (8') planting strip. The planting strip is to be landscaped, including street trees. Street lighting meeting code with required lighting levels shall be provided on the new internal street system. Street extension to nbrth property line: A public street is required -in the approximate location -of proposed Lot B. This street shall include a minimum of 42 feet in right-of-way. The street improvements for this extension shall include 25 feet of pavement, and curb and gutter along both sides of the street. Sidewalk's are required along both sides of this street section, both five feet (5') in width. The sidewalk on the east side of the street can be constructed adjacent to the new curb. The west side of the street shall include a five-foot (5') planting strip landscaped with street trees. Easterly off-site access roadway between S. 55th St and the development site: This street Section is initially to be used for secondary emergency. access through a private roadway easement. The pavement shall be a minimum of 20 feet in width through this roadway section. An emergency access gate, approved by the Renton Eire Department, can be installed where this roadway enters the new plat. If this private easement is replaced in the future with dedicated public right-of-way, the emergency access gate shall be removed. A note to this effect is to be included on the final plat. You have x4 days from the date.of this letter to appeal the administrative determination in accordance with City code. Appeals are to be filed in writing; with the City Clerk, and require a filing fee in the amount of $250.00. Appeals must be filed with the City Clerk before Tuesday, November 24, 2009, at 5:00 P.M. You may contact Kayren Kittrick at (425) 430-7299 if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, r Neil Watts, Director Development Services Division cc: Alex Pietsch, Community & Economic Development Administrator Chip Vincent, Planning Director Kayren Kittrick, Development Engineering Supervisor Jerry Wasser, Associate Planner AGENDA ITEM #7. b) DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE REPORT ERC MEETING DATE: February 22, 2010 Project Name: Wilson Park Preliminary Plat Owner: Robert Wilson, 21703 601h Street E, Lake Tapps, WA 98391 Applicant: Steve Beck, Amberwood LLC, 4735 NE 4`h Street, Renton, WA 98059 Contact: Shupe Holmberg, Baima & Holmberg Inc., 100 Front Street S, Issaquah, WA 98027 File Number: LUA09-140, ECF, PP Project Manager: Gerald C. Wasser, Associate Planner Project Summary: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and approval of a Preliminary Plat for the subdivision of a 108,884 square foot (2.5 acre) parcel in the R-1, R-8 and R-14 zones and in the Urban Separator Overlay. The original proposal encompassed 13 -lots and 4 -tracts (for open space and storm detention). The revised proposal encompasses 12 -lots and 3 -tracts (for open space). A portion of proposed Lot 12 would also contain an open space easement. A proposed stormwater vault would be located under the proposed access road. Proposed lots range in size from 4,500 to 13,006 square feet with a density of 7.99 dwelling units per acre. The proposed lots are intended for the future construction of single family residences. Slopes generally range from 13% to 39% and the southwestern portion of the site contains a small area of protected slopes (over 40%). Access to the proposed lots would be via a new street off of S 55th Street; a secondary access for emergency vehicles is also proposed. Grading would involve approximately 17,000 cubic yards of cut with approximately 6,000 cubic yards used as structural fill. Approximately 500 cubic yards of crushed rock fill would be used for road construction. Project Location: 720S 551h Street Exist. Bldg, Area SF. 3,520 sf (to be Proposed New Bldg. Area (footprint): N/A removed) Proposed New Bldg. Area (gross): N/A Site Area: 108,884 sf (2.5 ac) Total Building Area GSF: N/A STAFF Staff Recommends that the Environmental Review Committee issue a RECOMMENDATION: Determination of Non -Significance - Mitigated (DNS -M). Revised ERC Report 09-140 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) City of Renton Department of Commun Economic Development E )nmentol Review Committee Report WILSON PARK PRELIMINARY PLAT LUA09-140, ECF, PP Report of February 22, 2010 Page 2 of 12 Project Location Map Revised ERC Report 09-I40.doc AGENDA ITEM #7. b) City of Renton Department of Commun Economic Development mmentol Review Committee Report WILSON PARK PRELIMINARY PLAT LUA09-140, ECF, PP Report of February 22, 2010 Page 3 of 12 PART ONE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION / BACKGROUND The Environmental Review Committee considered the original proposal for this project on November 23, 2009. At that meeting the ERC requested that additional information be submitted prior to rendering a threshold determination. On November 24, 2009, staff placed the project "on hold" and requested the applicant to provide more information regarding: the final preliminary plat layout (including street rights- of-way and improvements); driveway locations and grades; detailed information on grading; and retaining wall location, height and materials. The applicant has submitted additional information and the project was taken "off hold" on February 5, 2010 and rescheduled for review by the Environmental Review Committee. Additionally, an Administrative Policy/Code Interpretation affecting RMC 4-3-110, Urban Separator Overlay Regulations and, specifically the dedication of open space requirements in the Talbot Urban Separator Overlay became effective on January 14, 2010. Urban Separator regulations require dedication of 50% of designated properties gross area as open space. In the May Valley Urban Separator entire properties are designated as Urban Separator so the dedication of 50% of the gross site area is appropriate. In the Talbot Urban Separator only small portions of properties are designated as Urban Separator and, therefore, it is inequitable to require that 50% of the gross area be designated as open space. By requiring 50% of the area designated as Urban Separator to be dedicated as open space, there is uniformity and fairness between the Talbot and May Valley Urban Separator areas. This code interpretation accomplishes this uniformity and fairness. The applicant has submitted calculations which indicate that 50% of the proposed Wilson Park Preliminary Plat area designated as Urban Separator would be dedicated as non -revocable open space. The applicant originally proposed a preliminary plat of 13 single family residential lots and 4 tracts for open space and stormwater detention. The applicant is now proposing a preliminary plat of 12 single family lots and 3 tracts for open space. In addition, the applicant is also proposing that 4,884 square feet of proposed Lot 12 (which is in the Talbot Urban Separator) be designated as an open space easement. The stormwater detention vault is now proposed to be located under proposed Road A. The total site area is approximately 2.5 acres. There are 27,156 square feet in the Residential -1 dwelling units per acre, 79,343 square feet in the Residential — 8 dwelling units per acre (R-8) zone and 2,384 square feet in the Residential —14 dwelling units per acre (R-14) zone. The Talbot Urban Separator Overlay corresponds to the R-1 zoning in the western portion of the site. Overall density on the site is 7.99 dwelling units per acre. Primary access to the site would be via a 50 -foot wide access easement from S 55th Street. This access easement is approximately 300 -feet in length and accesses the westerly portion of the site and is identified as Road A on the revised site plan. A secondary emergency access on the easterly side of the property is also proposed via a 30 -foot easement and continues to the northerly property line and is identified as Road B on the revised site plan. The applicant is proposing grading involving 17,000 cubic yards of cut with approximately 6,000 cubic yards of it being used as structural fill material. In addition, approximately 500 cubic yards of crushed rock fill would be imported to the project site for road construction. Revised ERC Report 09-140.doc AGENDA ITEM #7. b) City of Renton Department of Commun Economic Development E inmental Review Committee Report WILSON PARK PRELIMINARY PLAT LUA09-140, ECF, PP Report of February 22, 2010 Page 4 of 12 The existing single family residence (3,520 square feet) would be demolished to accommodate the proposed development. Comments from surrounding property owners have been received. The concerns expressed were: slope and the statement that appropriate engineering should be included so that property below the site is not compromised by landslide or run-off); trees (with a point raised that trees proposed for removal may weaken the hillside); drainage (with a point raised about an increase in impervious surfaces overburdening existing stormwater facilities); roads and access (with points raised about public safety); and stormwater retention. Code requirements and recommended mitigation measures address these concerns. PART TWO: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW In compliance with RCW 43.21C.240, the following environmental (SEPA) review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. A. Environmental Threshold Recommendation Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommends that the Responsible Officials: Issue a DNS -M with a 14 -day Appeal Period. B. Mitigation Measures 1. The applicant shall place a note on the face of the plat which requires a 15 -foot building setback line from the top of slopes which are 40% or greater. 2. The applicant will be required to comply with the recommendations contained in the Geotechnical Engineering Study, prepared by Liu & Associates, Inc. dated February 20, 2009. 3. The applicant shall clearly mark and fence trees outside the construction area and replant exposed ground as soon as possible after construction activities. 4. That the applicant shall provide a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Plan designed pursuant to the 2005 Department of Ecology's Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements and provide staff with a Construction Mitigation Plan prior to issuance of construction permits. 5. Weekly reports on the status and condition of the erosion control plan with any recommendations of change or revision to maintenance schedules or installation shall be submitted by the Project Engineer of record to the Public Works inspector. 6. Grading and foundation activities shall be conducted during the dryer months of the year from April 1 through October 31 unless otherwise approved by the Development Services Division. 7. The final drainage report and design shall be subject to the 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual. 8. The applicant shall be required to pay a Parks Mitigation Fee based on $530.76 per each new single family lot prior to recording the final plat (with credit given for the existing house). The fee is estimated to be $5,838.36. Revised ERC Report 09-140.doc AGENDA ITEM #7. b) City of Renton Department of Commun Economic Development nmentai Review Committee Report WILSON PARK PRELIMINARY PLAT LUA09-140, ECF, PP Report of February 22, 2010 Page 5 of 12 9. The applicant shall be required to pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee based on $75.00 per each new average daily vehicle trip associated with the proposed project prior to recording of the final plat (with credit given for the existing house). The fee is estimated to be 7,895.25. 10. The applicant shall be required to pay a Fire Mitigation Fee based on $488.00 per each new single family lot prior to recording the final plat (with credit given for the existing house). The fee is estimated at $5,368.00. 11. The applicant shall submit a sample board indicating the texture and tinting to be used on all visible surfaces of retaining walls for the review and approval of the Planning Division project manager prior to the issuance of construction permits. C. Exhibits Exhibit 1 Vicinity Map Exhibit 2 Zoning Map Exhibit 3 Preliminary Plat Map Exhibit 4 Topography Map Exhibit 5 Generalized Utilities/Drainage Control/ Conceptual Grading/Landscape Plan Exhibit 6 Road Profile Exhibit 7 Wall Profiles and Cross -Sections Exhibit 8 Tree Inventory/Retention Plan Exhibit 9 Street Modification letter dated November 10, 2009 D. Environmental Impacts The Proposal was circulated and reviewed by various City Departments and Divisions to determine whether the applicant has adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated to occur in conjunction with the proposed development. Staff reviewers have identified that the proposal is likely to have the following probable impacts: 1. Earth Impacts: The subject site is located on a broad moderate to steep westerly -sloping hillside. This downward slope is at grades of 13 to 39 percent. The higher gradient portions of the site generally lie within the eastern 100 to 200 feet and the western 150 to 200 feet of the site. The applicant submitted a Geotechnical Engineering Study prepared by Liu & Associates, Inc. dated February 20, 2009. The report identifies the soils on the site as Kame Terrace deposits underlain by Ground Moraine. Kame Terrace deposits consist mostly of silty sand and gravel to cobble. Kame Terrace deposits are of moderately -high to high permeability and can provide good foundation support to structure in their native undisturbed state. The site contains areas of protected slopes (greater than 40%) in the southwestern portion of the property. This area of protected slopes would be contained within Tract B. The report concludes that conventional footing foundations constructed on or into the competent basal soils may be used to support residential buildings and the stormwater detention vault. Geotechnical study Revised ERCReport 09-140.doc AGENDA ITEM #7. b) City of Renton Department of Communi Economic Development E amental Review Committee Report WILSON PARK PRELIMINARY PLAT ' LUA09-140, ECF, PP Report of February 22, 2410 Page 6 of 12 recommendations include a 15 -foot building setback line from the top or toe of slopes with grades of 40% or more. Staff recommends that as a mitigation measure the applicant be required to place a note on the face of the plat which states that a 15 -foot building setback line shall be established from the top of slopes with grades greater of 40% or more. The applicant is creating areas of protected slopes (40% or greater) in the easterly portion of the site on Lots 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9. Pursuant to RMC 4-3-050J.5, these slopes may not be developed. The revised plans submitted by the applicant indicate retaining walls along the westerly side of proposed Lot 12 (and within the R-14 zone) and through proposed Lots 5, 6 and 7. These walls range from 12 -feet to 20 -feet in height. The retaining wall on the easterly side of the property would be poured concrete or soil/nail composition and the westerly retaining wall would pour concrete or reinforced earth. The geotechnical study states that soils at shallow depth on the project site have good to excellent resistance against slope failures. The study concludes that if recommendations are followed the potential for deep-seated landslides would be minimal. Such recommendations include preserving vegetation outside of construction limits, re -vegetating exposed ground as soon as possible after construction activities and controlling runoff from impervious surfaces such as roofs, paved roadways and driveways. Staff recommends as a mitigation measure that the applicant shall clearly mark and fence trees outside the construction area and that exposed ground be replanted as soon as possible after construction activities. The topsoil and loose to medium -dense weathered soils on-site are of low resistance to erosion. Erosion may occur in the weaker surficial soils over the higher gradient areas if they are devoid of vegetation. Progressive erosion can lead to shallow, skin -type mudflows. The geotechnical report recommends preservation and maintenance of vegetation outside of construction limits to mitigate this potential hazard. The study also recommends that concentrated stormwater should not be discharged uncontrolled onto the ground. Stormwater from impervious surfaces should be captured by underground drain line systems connected to roof downspouts or by catch basins installed in roadways and driveways. Temporary erosion control measures are also recommended and these include: a thin layer of quarry spalls placed over excavated areas to protect the subgrade soils from disturbance by construction traffic; silt fences installed along the downhill sides of construction areas to prevent sediment from being transported onto adjacent properties or streets; and ditches or interceptor trench drains installed on the uphill sides of construction areas to intercept and drain away storm runoff and near -surface groundwater seepage. Staff recommends a mitigation measure which requires compliance with the recommendations contained in the Geotechnical Engineering Study, prepared by Liu & associates, Inc. dated February 20, 2009. Staff also recommends that the applicant provide a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Plan designed pursuant to the Department of Ecology's Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements outlined in Volume II of the 2005 Stormwater Management Manual and provide staff with a Construction Mitigation Plan prior to issuance of construction permits. This mitigation measure shall be subject to review and approval of the Development Services Division. Staff further recommends that weekly reports on the status and condition of the erosion control plan with any recommendations of change or revision to maintenance schedules or installation shall be submitted by the Project Engineer of record to the Public Works inspector. Because of Revised ERC Report 09-140.doc AGENDA ITEM #7. b) City of Renton Department of Commun' Economic Development L Pnmental Review Committee Report WILSON PARK PRELIMINARY PLAT LUA09-140, ECF, PP Report of February 22, 2010 Page 7 of 12 moisture -sensitive fine-grained soils mantling the site and the higher gradient areas within the site the geotechnical study recommends that grading and foundation construction be carried out and completed within the dryer period of the year from April 1 through October 31 unless otherwise approved by the Development Services Division. Staff recommends that as a mitigation measure that the applicant adhere to a construction schedule involving grading and foundation work during the dryer period of the year. The geotechnical study discusses excavation and fills slopes. Approximately 17,000 cubic yards of earth material would be cut with approximately 6,000 cubic yards of it used as structural fill. Approximately 500 cubic yards of crushed rock fill would be imported for road construction. Excavation slopes shall not be steeper than the limits specified in local regulations. Permanent fill embankments required to support structural or traffic loads should be constructed with compacted structural fill placed over undisturbed, proof -rolled, firm, native, fresh Kame Terrace and/or lodgement till soils after the unsuitable soils are completely stripped. Mitigation Measures: 1. The applicant shall place a note on the face of the plat which requires a 15 -foot building setback line from the top of slopes which are 40% or greater 2. The applicant will be required to comply with the recommendations contained in the Geotechnical Engineering Study, prepared by Liu & Associates, Inc. dated February 20, 2009. 3. The applicant shall clearly mark and fence trees outside the construction area and replant exposed ground as soon as possible after construction activities. 4. That the applicant shall provide a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Plan designed pursuant to the 2005 Department of Ecology's Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements and provide staff with a Construction Mitigation Plan prior to issuance of construction permits. 5. Weekly reports on the status and condition of the erosion control plan with any recommendations of change or revision to maintenance schedules or installation shall be submitted by the Project Engineer of record to the Public Works inspector. 6. Grading and foundation activities shall be conducted during the dryer months of the year from April 1 through October 31 unless otherwise approved by the Development Services Division. Nexus: SEPA Environmental Regulations; 2005 Department of Ecology Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements 2, Storm Water Impacts: The applicant submitted a Technical Information Report for Wilson Park, prepared by Baima & Holmberg, Inc. dated May 5, 2009. That report includes an analysis of upstream tributary drainage which states that the parcel to the east drains onto the site. The Level 1 Downstream Drainage Analysis in the report states that runoff from the site flows west into lots in the adjacent Geneva Court development. The majorities of these flows collect in a drain constructed along the back yards of the western -most lots of the Geneva Court development and then flow into the Revised FRC Report 09-140.doc AGENDA ITEM #7. b) City of Renton Department of Commune Economic (Development E inmental Review Committee Report WILSON PARK PRELIMINARY PLAT LUA09-140, ECF, PP Report of February 22, 2010 Page 8 of 12 storm system in South 53rd Place. This flow collects in a stormwater pond/bioswale facility located at the intersection of Talbot Road S and South 53' d Place approximately 750 -feet downstream from the site. This facility outfalls through an 18 -inch pipe to the west side of Talbot Road S into a poorly defined channel flowing into the woods. The flows then pass through a 12 -inch culvert under a walking path and continue to flow west to a wooded wetland area more than a quarter mile downstream from the site. Flows into the ditch along S 55th Street continue west in a rock lined channel along the north side of the street to the intersection of Talbot Road S and S 55th Street. The channel is eroded and shows signs of flowing into the street. Flows from the ditch along Talbot Road S collect in the storm system about 850 -feet downstream from the site eventually flowing into Springbrook Creek at about 1,800 -feet downstream from the site. Springbrook Creek continues flowing west to about one-half mile downstream of the site where it enters a box culvert crossing SR 167. The Technical Information Report indicates that there are no apparent drainage problems. The revised submitted plans indicate that a proposed storm water detention vault would be located in the easterly proposed access road to control downstream stormwater impacts. Staff recommends as a mitigation measure that the final drainage report shall be subject to the 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual. Mitigation Measures: 1. The final drainage report and design shall be subject to the 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual. Nexus: SEPA Environmental Regulations; 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual 3. Vegetation Impacts: The applicant submitted a Tree Inventory and Retention Plan and a Tree Retention Worksheet with the project application. There are 101 total trees on the project site. Twenty- three trees would be required to be retained. The applicant is proposing to retain 21 trees and replacing the 2 additionally required trees with twelve 2 -inch caliper trees as required. Lot 12, Tracts C and D, and a portion of Tract B are located in the Talbot Urban Separator Overlay. As stated previously in this report, the purpose of the Urban Separator Overlay includes providing a continuous open space and wildlife corridor. A revised tree retention worksheet and a revised tree replacement plan were submitted by the applicant and indicate that 60 replacement trees would be planted on site. Because the majority of these trees would be planted within the Urban Separator area, the proposed open space area would be provided with vegetation enhancement. Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation is necessary. Nexus: N/A 4. Parks and Recreation Impacts: It is anticipated that the proposed development would generate future residents who would use City park and recreation facilities and programs. Staff recommends that the applicant be required to pay a Parks Mitigation Fee based on $530.76 per each new single family lot to be payable prior to recording the final plat. The fee is estimated at $5,838.36 (12 new lots —1 existing lot x $530.76 = $5,838.36). Revised ERC Report 09-140.doc AGENDA ITEM #7. b) City of Renton Department of Communi Economic Development E nmental Review Committee Report WILSON PARK PRELIMINARYPLAT LUA09-140, ECF, PP Report of February 22, 2010 Page 9 of 12 Mitigation Measures: 1. The applicant shall be required to pay a Parks Mitigation Fee based on $530.76 per each new single family lot prior to recording the final plat (with credit given for the existing house). The fee is estimated to be $5,838.36. Nexus: SEPA Environmental Regulations; Parks Mitigation Fee Resolution No. 3082, Ordinance No. 4527 5. Transportation Impacts: Access to the site would be from S 55t Street via a 50 -foot access easement (Road A) to the west and a 30 -foot emergency access easement to the east (Road B). The applicant has requested a street modification to reduce the internal roadway right-of-way width from 50 -feet to 37.5 -feet. That request was denied by the Development Services Director on November 10, 2009; therefore, the internal roadway is required to be a minimum of 42 -feet of right-of-way. Additional right-of-way is also required at all intersections and turns in the roadway configuration. The pavement can be reduced to 26 -feet in width allowing parking on one side of the street. Both sides of the street would be required to be improved with curb and gutter. A sidewalk is not required on the southerly side of the street; however, the curb shall be installed 3 -feet from the southerly edge of the right-of-way. A 5 -foot sidewalk is required by code and must be provided along the northerly and outside portion of the new internal street with an 8 -foot planting strip (which shall include street trees). Additionally, street lighting is also required. The revised proposed internal street design provides a connection to the property to the north. That property is large enough for future platting. This proposed northerly street extension is depicted on the revised site plan as Road B. Proposed Lots 4 through 7 front on this street. The westerly access roadway must be dedicated as public right-of-way. The pavement may be reduced to 26 -feet in width, allowing for parking on one side of the street. Curb and gutter must be provided along the westerly edge of the pavement. An 8 -foot wide planting strip and a 5 -foot sidewalk must be provided along the west side of the street. The easterly access easement from S 55th Street is initially to be used for secondary emergency access through private road easement. The pavement must be a minimum of 20 -feet in width. An emergency access gate, approved by the Fire Department can be installed where the roadway enters the new plat. The proposal would result in an increase in traffic trips to the City's street system. Therefore, staff recommends that the applicant pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee based on a rate of $75.00 per additional average daily vehicle trip. Each new residence is expected to generate 9.57 trips; credit is given for the existing residence on the subject property. The Traffic Mitigation Fee is estimated to be $7,895.25 (12 new lots —1 existing lot x 9.57 trips x $75.00 = $7,895.25) and would be payable prior to recording the final plat. Mitigation Measures: 1. The applicant shall be required to pay a Traffic Mitigation fee based on $75.00 per each new average daily vehicle trip associated with the proposed project prior to recording of Revised FRC Report 09-140. doc AGENDA ITEM #7. b) City of Renton Department of Communi Economic Development E amental Review Committee Report WILSON PARK PRELIMINARY PLAT LUA09-340, ECF, PP Report of February 22, 2010 Page 10 of 12 the final plat (with credit given for the existing house). The fee is estimated to be 7,895.25. Nexus: SEPA Environmental Regulations; Transportation Mitigation Fee Resolution No. 3100, Ordinance 4527 6. Fire & Police Impacts: Fire apparatus access roads appear adequate. All required roadways must be fully paved and not exceed 15°x6 grade elevation, turning radius is 25 -foot inside and 45 -foot outside. Proposed access gates must meet all requirements for Fire Department standards including Click -2 -Enter control devices. Minimum 20 -foot roadway sections must be signed for "No Parking — Anytime" on each side at maximum 50 -foot intervals. Fire Prevention staff indicates that sufficient resources exist to furnish services to the proposed development subject to the condition that the applicant provides the required improvements and fees. As the proposal could potentially add 13 new residences, staff recommends that the Applicant be required to pay a Fire Mitigation Fee in the amount of $488.00 per each new single family lot with credit given for the existing single family residence. The total fee is estimated to be 5,368.00 (13 new lots —1 existing lot X $488.00 = $5,368.00). Mitigation Measures: 1. The applicant shall be required to pay a Fire Mitigation Fee based on $488.00 per each new single family lot prior to recording the final plat. The fee is estimated at $5,368.00. Nexus: SEPA Environmental Regulations; Fire Mitigation Fee Resolution No. 2913, Ordinance no. 4527 7. Aesthetics Impacts: The applicant is proposing retaining walls on the property along the westerly property line and in the northeastern portion of the subject property and within proposed Lot 7. These proposed retaining walls would range from 12 to 20 -feet in height. The applicant has indicated that the proposed retaining wall on the westerly side of the property would be composed of poured concrete or reinforced earth and the proposed retaining wall in the eastern portion of the property would be composed of poured concrete or soil nail. Because the height of these proposed walls may cause visual impacts to adjoining property owners, staff recommends as a mitigation measure that a combination of texturing and tinting shall be used on all visible surfaces of the retaining walls. A sample board indicating the texture and tinting for the retaining walls shall be submitted for the review and approval of the Planning Division project manager prior to issuance of construction permits. Mitigation Measures: 1. The applicant shall submit a sample board indicating the texture and tinting to be used on all visible surfaces of retaining walls for the review and approval of the Planning Division project manager prior to the issuance of construction permits. Nexus: SEPA Environmental Regulations E. Comments of Reviewing Departments The proposal has been circulated to City Department and Division Reviewers. Where applicable, their comments have been incorporated into the text of this report and/or "Advisory Notes to Applicant." Revised ERC Report 09-140.doc AGENDA ITEM #7. b) City of Renton Department of Commur Economic Development onmental Review Committee Report WILSON PARK PRELIMINARY PLAT LUAO9-140, ECF, PP Report of February 22, 2010 _ Page 11 of 12 Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File and may be attached to this report. Environmental Determination Appeal Process: Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM, March 12, 2010. Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.8 governs appeals to the Hearing Examiner. Appeals must be filed in writing at the City Clerk's office along with the required fee. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the City Clerk's Office, Renton City Hall - 7th Floor, 1055 S. Grady Way, Renton WA 98057. ADVISORY NOTES TO APPLICANT The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the administrative land use action. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for the land use actions. Planning: 1. RMC 4-4-030C2 limits haul hours between 8:30 am and 3:30 pm, Monday through Friday unless otherwise approved by the Community &Economic Development Department. 2. Commercial, multi -family, new single family and other non-residential construction activities shall be restricted to the hours between 7:00 am and 8:0-0 pm, Monday through Friday. Work on Saturdays shall be restricted to the hours between 9:00 am and 8:00 pm. No work shall be permitted on Sundays. 3. A Renton Schools Impact Fee is required and is payable at the time of building permit issuance. 4. The plat is subject to the Urban Separator Overlay Regulations, RMC 4-3-110. 5. The applicant must obtain easements for any off-site construction activities. Fire: 1. A fire hydrant with 1,000 gpm fire flow is required within 300 feet of all new single family structures. If building square footage exceeds 3,600 square feet in area, the minimum fire flow increases to 1,500 gpm and requires two hydrants within 300 feet of the structures. 2. Fire apparatus access roads appear adequate. All required roadways shall be fully paved and shall not exceed 15% grade elevation, turning radius is 25 -foot inside and 45 -foot outside. Proposed access gate shall meet all requirements for Fire department standards including Click -2 -Enter control device. Minimum 20 -foot roadway sections shall be signed for "No Parking—Anytime" on each side at maximum 50 -foot intervals. Water: Soos Creek Water will serve the site. Extension of a water line will be required for domestic and emergency service. Sanitary Sewer: A minimum 8 -inch diameter sanitary sewer is required to be extended to serve the site. 2. The System Development Charge shall be determined by the size of the meter installed per each lot. This fee is payable with the construction permit. Revised ERC Report 09-140.doc AGENDA ITEM #7. b) City of Renton Department of Commun) Economic Development E nmentat Review Committee Report WILSON PARK PRELIMINARY PIAT LUA09-140, ECF, PP Report of February 22, 2010 Page 12 of 12 Surface Water: 1. The System Development Charge shall be at the current rate of $1,012.00 per single family site. This fee is payable with the construction permit. Transportation: 1. All new access roads shall meet City of Renton standards or as modified. 2. A dedicated connection to the northern property line is required. Plan Review —General: 1. All plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. 2. A construction permit is required. When plans are complete three copies of the drawings, two copies of the drainage report, a construction estimate, application and appropriate fee shall be submitted to the City Hall sixth floor counter. Revised ERC Report 09-140.doc AGENDA ITEM #7. b) r jlr r PJ e w+' 1T i la! • c n _ C$:f '.' _ - Ch LSJ II I EXHIBIT 1 w x » a i= p g = - v. a q ' a _r.a ua ree • a Y^s7~',Y FN s JD A w a ^: 1 Y_, FaF u, ° o klb01•S M{R ,' m" cl R ul LLl _ w Is 3O q P5 IE a• Q I i`` J I'S as '3AY- DR ..4HZ I°! a 9y a ° d•' a® ii ' ;IM1I •e.t :s14 '' tl i` Cd LU AU-6 _ —.-. fin• -- T ld Ni66` sem LP W ' Cd ill I ti I d 14 4. i d W o a r St m r Is C11 It' 1 „ N • ' I is Qsa i 08 4 x iC i acd ct: yy[ i fie'' •.L.%,, s lil.2{ON ___ _ 0 A _---- `o UO AGENDA ITEM #7. b) M LU ca EXHIBIT 2 CA co SW 4,p, $; S 1TTn St R-$ Co R-8 R-14 Jf co co co co R-14 co 5 RM -F SW ]M 6, S 1lalh 9 5 R-4 co co co R710 co 4h co co g co W W y o RM -F S R R-8 PAW s, m occ s N s sans R-14 se,eTns : R-14 R-1 R -A M 5$ R-0 R-1 R -q R-4 4 ZONING MAP BOOK J3 - 06 T22N R5E E 1/2 PW TECHNICAL SERVICES PRINTED ON 11/13/09 T 1+j 0 200 400 31 T23N R5E E a./2Feet 1:4,800 5331 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) to]NIac IL .11:101971 74 92 93; 4551'.456- 459 _ _ 461 1 77 B2;--- 21ST2411N RAE- l B 6 7- T24N25T24NR4E-0 R5E i9 T24N R6 28 T24N R5E: 274N R5E.. ' 26 T24N RSE8194W455Wi5 I i j, J4584'` 46(3, 464 Its 1 C2"" 06,C 7R4E:'. 36 T24N R4E 31 T24N R5E ` ryn3fi6 j 307 a'ew 1W$ 3491 - 35T4NR51 r lil l J `,.. Y y... z i D3. tD 4 Vq)77 -Qw 7 D 7f iT73 1 R E t 1 2 g4E ` 6 T23N RSE : T23N_ ih4 T23f 1 R5E2 T23N R5E \ 3 i23N RSE 31 s _ 319 _ 369 CU5$ QG 7 E 12 T23N 4E _1 RSE . f RSE 9T23N RSET I 2 10 T23N-}:. N R5E r' 1325 - 3 21327 , 370 g,ip g - LTi Ll' „ .. ` - - I', _ 45 4 asr Ra8 3 rel3T231ff4E16i23NR5E.,---: 1'7T1z3 - t R5E 16 T23N RSE 1 T23N!R5E 432W 1 I 11 I I X35 33.6 33 = 371 815, J 846 = f 3T234Rdt ' " _ 2, 24 T23r R4E 19 i`Z3N 135E i ' .20T231R51 _y= 21 T23N A5E : - . 22 T23 R5E 23 T23N 2 44 34 6OQ'I, - 601 602 82Q 821 ij 4Hl T23N R4E 25 T23N R4E i', 0 T23N R5E` ''' 29 T23N`R5E - 2S T23N R5E- - T23N R5E 2fi T23N R5E 25' 0 - 'ii 6p4 j EI ; 605 825 826 f _ -- I I d 3 E 36 T23N R4E 31 T23 R5E 11 3223! RSE 33 T23N R 34 T23N R5E 35 T23N R5E 36 607 608 609, '63' 833 J i r22N R4E = j- L V 7 ra1T22Nrti4E6722NR5E5T22N: R5E 4 T22N,E _° 3 T22N R5E 2 T22N RSE 11 T 21 RESIDENTIAL MIXED USE CENTERS INDUSTRIAL rc (RC) Resource Conservation [CV) Center Village IH (IL) Industrial -Light i (R-1) Residential 1 du/ac c -Mf (UC -N 1) Urban Center- North 1 iM (IM) Industrial - Medium f? -a : (R-4) Residential 4 du/ac LcNe (UC -N2) Urban Center- North Z F iL [IH) Industrial - Heavy P-a(R-8) Residential 8 du/ac EE [CD) Center Downtown H (RMH) Residential Manufactured Homes FF, -Ic (R-101Residential10 du/ac COMMERCIAL I;, -.a (R-14) Residential 14 du/ac ----- Renton city Limits aH-= (RM -F) Residential Multi -Family co; (COR) Commercial/Office/Residential _ Y Adjacent City Limits kn-T (RM -T) Residential Multi -Family Traditional EeE (CA) Commercial Arterial Ry -u (RM U) Residential Multi -Family Urban Center co [CO) Commercial Office KROLL PAGE Lc(CIN) Commercial Neighborhood PAG E# INDEXm<_ +focimen• _s a rnnhc r..ese.atM. o: gooro teen Tl,n rwy is or vrsyl, rcases un'y. SECEROwN/pANGE AGENDA ITEM #7. b) r 7g it 4 1.5 1; W Z q Z Z c? Q NF - ZZ i5 dZ . w LL Z 4W wn rO wU L LL O Z o o CL S IF ------- 1 r------, -----, ------- I I I I I 1 1 I I I i I I I I I I 0' La F1U'M, .[19p5 n ,06'OS r------ Cpl$ afire I 'C,m ILbC9 dSJN 7134 6/[ ice I II I II L -------JJ p. b R E m 8m Iwo I br If I II i h! Iry bLO i II 1 L r _MQe _T I IIIl v IIII I T N II I l lam pl I v ire-------- i UVB F B: f N..tlS.V JN afire ILbC9 dSJN 7134 6/[ ice 8 R E m 8m Iwo I br If i h! Iry bLO i 1 L plµ h EXHIBIT 3 R qg qg R'k8 INA lily I' ll F19 U11 ova pg: aB aA fa rl .orn sz.war, Cups afire 8 R E m 8m Iwo I br If ih! Iry bLO i 1 L pl J 9g i UU Rw aa PE L-- — — t W o own it rcwr br If ih! Iry HCl bLO 1 L 69Z pl HdM 31M A9 Iggtall wia ro 14UVd MOSIIM ,• OH• uwa _ x — — ca ru ec:n:eo- IA/ro/m e..oeace.o-u3-100-Le4L\nw\x-east rc, AGENDA ITEM #7. b) EXHIBIT 4 3s i,r wal gE d s - Mh PFL P,u: ..e4 ori ,p € iPd `W" R i5 II y3E 4r a g " mo f47ri7) N Oise M.it.,fLms AVIC Wim W O e y LO N, Uzi} 14 a g " mo I W Z _ _ o _\ _ - MZ IwIz 9 ds,1h ale r/I 2s Y/I 7S ',M/ a;?a :•i S' {}_ - - mow^' - i 'tt Ell I S 1 _ tltla' 31,9 .B M4Vtl oo-cesi 41111 AH"U9OdOLAVVCMO8 — eQaz w xard NOSIWI e W PH +W+B W O N, I W Z _ _ o _\ _ - MZ IwIz 9 ds,1h ale r/I 2s Y/I 7S ',M/ a;?a :•i S' {}_ - - mow^' - i 'tt Ell I S 1 _ tltla' 31,9 .B M4Vtl oo-cesi 41111 AH"U9OdOLAVVCMO8 — eQaz w xard NOSIWI e W PH +W+B AGENDA ITEM #7. b) w 5w EXHIBIT 5 m'" l M 1! M 1! I . • Fr4s4saY 9X q c 8s L A ate- a zE d 3 6Bf477d71arvrszmLzt,rcros ZZ I I f • e C N l it tl ti i 4 a Jed y dR a _ _ Y L I I I•--- I n ' aES Y-. Zvi Z I IL D Nai[ ttLL Om W x I LL I i 41— LL D v'y 4 off _! .j'S 'h/I 'i5 •IY6L M AH. 3 Y`i'p•// At I s = 9wwro sarrv waara9 _--.- I.a, Lw re w a LL O-L892 i+rrua aoanoa oo Yn q OAMPM ..4.tea . ea uho nwV.1 wnR11M -,a 16d M1 6i:t.:LO 60/Y9/9P 6•o 60LLM.......... Z\ewlLoo—exs[\ooSL\ o AGENDA ITEM #7. b) 3 :103d OVOld NHYd M0811M 41¢ yWiw1,9 EXHIBIT 6 k nuc Noun WHEN Enos Emrscom mmosom ME ml s a[ wB K4L2 . 111 3 :103d OVOld NHYd M0811M 41¢ yWiw1,9 EXHIBIT 6 k nuc ia.i er ro e A & Noun WHEN Enos Emrscom mmosom ME ml ia.i er ro e A & AGENDA ITEM #7. b) 8 1 4 EXHIBIT 7 2 w U) 0 NZ w ZZ C')o N F' ZZ M UZ w0 CO LL Z 0W w LL w0 co 0 F - LL 0 Z 0 0 CL I g] 8 R tiY2.5 Ya 4 S g eb 6 aJ Fs\ 4 X11 2 w U) 0 NZ w ZZ C')o N F' ZZ M UZ w0 CO LL Z 0W w LL w0 co 0 F - LL 0 Z 0 0 CL I g] 8 R tiY2.5 Ya 4 S g S 6 aJ 8 r 8 Y s S 8 s 8 8 x R 8 S 8 8 BNOLL 3S-SB N9 _ i 63011d TWA — MMVd N091MM aJ 8 S 8 8 BNOLL 3S-SB N9 _ i 63011d TWA — MMVd N091MM J 8 S 8 8 BNOLL 3S-SB N9 _ i 63011d TWA — MMVd N091MM AGENDA ITEM #7. b) EXHIBIT 8 bpP"&$- 3 W N Wzn aK"e Aessss6 'sa Msix. as got no xmas st sss cetlE e eep JIM Lem— rO19i9d AI.Lt.f1105 uy_ ___—__--_ 1081E —__— W. \ _ Sow `' lter ' rr xw Z Z r u a Ry f 1 pwZ R! LL Z C11- jp0 xDD 3urDa \ I 7.7 LU L= V xa> p 01 syr AE Hi a a l pipyz OSC_ a 11 W9 AOX 83d t/iy c K b .- y` y,' r• ^ice .. _ _._._ __...._ \ *Hz' s-// _ ' r r r r i r r i n s s _., xaer pro x°e aa row loo -Gays KVU MOLLM3137VABOLN3AM 331LL WA Boa f.° NUVd MOSIIM l°"+ N IMI,i B ypd g{:w:to 5o/.also wt.rltu0-.ml-.°0 [eoc\.rw\rw-ce9£\009t\9 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) Denis Law City of EXHIBIT 9 Mayor Department of Community and Economic Development November 10, 2009 Alex Pietsch, Administrator Tom Redding Baima & Holmberg, Inc. 100 Front Street South Issaquah, WA 98027-3817 Subject: Wilson Park Preliminary Plat — LUA09-140 720 South 55th Street Street Modification requests Dear Mr. Redding: We have completed our review of your request for modifications to the street standards for the proposed Wilson Park Preliminary Plat located at 720 South 55th Street. The proposed residential subdivision is for 13 single family building lots and four additional tracts. The subdivision will be served by two access roadways south of the site to South 551h Street, connecting to a new street through the proposed project. You have requested modification for the internal roadway, including eliminating the required sidewalk from one side of the street, reducing the right-of-way width, and eliminating the requirement for a cul- de-sac. Clarification of the street improvement requirements for the two off-site access roadways is also requested. The proposal continues to be based on a waiver of the required connection to the north property line. The request to reduce the internal street right-of-way width to 37.5 feet is denied. However, the request to delete the sidewalk from one side of the internal street is approved, subject to providing an eight -foot (8') planting strip between the street and remaining sidewalk. The requirement for a cul-de- sac is modified to allow for a hammerhead turnaround and gated emergency access for secondary access. The proposal to waive the requirement to extend the public street to the north property line is also denied. City Code 4-6-050 (Street Standards) requires full street improvements for all adjacent rights-of-way for, within, and dedicated by a plat. The City can modify street improvements for new plats if there are practical difficulties in carrying out the provisions of the Street Improvement Ordinance. The Modification Procedures, as defined in Section 4-9-250D, clearly states the criteria for approval by the Department Administrator. In order for a modification to be approved, the Department Administrator must find that a special individual reason makes the strict letter of this Ordinance impractical, that the modification is in conformity with the intent and purpose of this Ordinance, and that such modification: a) Will meet the objectives and safety, function, appearance, environmental protection and maintainability intended by this Ordinance, based upon sound engineering judgment; and b) Will not be injurious to other property(s) in the vicinity; and Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way 9 Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov AGENDA ITEM #7. b) Mr. Tom Redding Wilson Park Preliminary Plat Page 2 of 3 c) Conform to the intent and purpose of the Code; and d) Can be shown to be justified and required for the use and situation intended; and e) Will not create adverse impacts to other properties in the vicinity. The request to reduce the right-of-way width to 37.5 feet cannot be approved. The code allows for consideration of reduction to 42 feet in width in cases where the additional area provides for a more reasonable lot configuration. The reduction to 42 feet in width is approved, but we fail to find justification to reduce the public right-of-way in this new residential neighborhood to a lesser standard. The request to eliminate the sidewalk along the southerly side of the new internal roadway can be supported in this situation, provided there are equivalent value amenities provided in exchange for these improvements. This request is granted, subject to the provision of an eight- foot (8') wide planting Strip, including landscaping and street trees, on the northerly side of the street with the new sidewalk. The project site will be accessed by a single public street, which requires a cul-de-sac. The proposed secondary access will mitigate the dead-end roadway configuration for emergency vehicles, but will not be available for regular vehicles and delivery trucks. The requirement for a cul-de-sac is hereby waived, subject to providing a full hammerhead turnaround in public right-of-way and emergency secondary access through an approved gated system. The function of a hammerhead turnaround will be provided with the extension of the street to the north property line, as addressed below. The proposed street design for the plat fails to meet the requirement to extend the public street system through the plat to the northerly property line. The property north of the site is large enough for future platting, and will be connected to the public street system approved for this plat. The requirement for extension of the public street system through the proposed plat to the north property line remains. This extension is to be provided where Lot 8 is proposed, as an extension of the easterly north -south access roadway. The street improvements required for this preliminary plat, as modified in this decision, are as follows: Westerly off-site access roadway between S. 55th St and the development site: This street section shall be in dedicated public right-of-way. The pavement width can be reduced to 26 feet (26') in width, allowing for parking on one side of the street. Curb and gutter shall be provided along the westerly edge of the pavement. An eight -foot (8') wide planting strip shall be provided along the west side of the street, with a five-foot (5') wide sidewalk. New internal street system: This street section shall be in a minimum 42 -foot width right-of-way. Additional right-of-way is also required at all the intersections and turns in the roadway configuration. These radius dedications shall be for a 15 -foot radius. The pavement width can be reduced to 26 feet in width, allowing for parking on one side of the street. Both sides of the street shall be improved with curb and gutter. A sidewalk is not required on the southerly side of the new street. The face of the curb shall be installed three feet (3') from the southerly edge of the right-of-way. A five-foot (5') wide sidewalk shall be provided along the northerly and "outside" portion of the new internal street, with an AGENDA ITEM #7. b) Mr. Tom Redding Wilson Park Preliminary Plat Page 2 of 3 c) Conform to the intent and purpose of the Code; and d) Can be shown to be justified and required for the use and situation intended; and e) Will not create adverse impacts to other properties in the vicinity. The request to reduce the right-of-way width to 37.5 feet cannot be approved. The code allows for consideration of reduction to 42 feet in width in cases where the additional area provides for a more reasonable lot configuration. The reduction to 42 feet in width is approved, but we fail to find justification to reduce the public right-of-way in this new residential neighborhood to a lesser standard. The request to eliminate the sidewalk along the southerly side of the new internal roadway can be supported in this situation, provided there are equivalent value amenities provided in exchange for these improvements. This request is granted, subject to the provision of an eight- foot (8') wide planting strip, including landscaping and street trees, on the northerly side of the street with the new sidewalk. The project site will be accessed by a single public street, which requires a cul-de-sac. The proposed secondary access will mitigate the dead-end roadway configuration for emergency vehicles, but will not be available for regularvehicles and delivery trucks. The requirement for a cul-de-sac is hereby waived, subject to providing a full hammerhead turnaround in public right-of-way and emergency secondary access through an approved gated system. The function of a hammerhead turnaround will be provided with the extension of the street to the north property line, as addressed below. The proposed street design for the plat fails to meet the requirement to extend the public street system through the plat to the northerly property line. The property north of the site is large enough for future platting, and will be connected to the public street system approved for this plat. The requirement for extension of the public street system through the proposed plat to the north property line remains. This extension is to be provided where Lot 8 is proposed, as an extension of the easterly north -south access roadway. The street improvements required for this preliminary plat, as modified in this decision, are as follows: Westerly off-site access roadway between 5.55`" St and the development site: This street section shall be in dedicated public right-of-way. The pavement width can be reduced to 25 feet (26') in width, allowing for parking on one side of the street. Curb and gutter shall be provided along the westerly edge Rf the pavement. An eight -foot (8') wide planting strip shall be provided along the west side of the street, with a five-foot (5') wide sidewalk. New internal streets stem. This street section shall be in a minimum 42 -foot width right-of-way. Additional right-of-way is also required at all the intersections and turns in the roadway configuration. These radius dedications shall be for a 15 -foot radius. The pavement width can be reduced to 26 feet in width, allowing for parking on one side of the street. Both sides of the street shall be improved with curb and gutter. A sidewalk is not required on the southerly side of the new street. The.face of the curb shall be installed three feet (3') from the southerly edge of the right-of-way. A five-foot (5') wide sidewalk shall be provided along the northerly and "outside" portion of the new internal street, with an AGENDA ITEM #7. b) Mr. Tom Redding Wilson Park Preliminary Plat Page 3 of 3 eight -foot (8') planting strip. The planting strip is to be landscaped, including street trees. Street lighting meeting code with required lighting levels shall be provided on the new internal street system. Street extension to north property line: A public street is required in the approximate location of proposed Lot 8. This street shall include a minimum of 42 feet in right-of-way. The street improvements for this extension shall include 26 feet of pavement, and curb and gutter along both sides of the street. Sidewalks are required along both sides of this street section, both five feet (5') in width. The sidewalk on the east side of the street can be constructed adjacent to the new curb. The west side of the street shall include a five-foot (5') planting strip landscaped with street trees. Easterly off-site access roadway between S. 55th St and the development site: This street section is initially to be used for secondary emergency access through a private roadway easement_ The pavement shall be a minimum of 20 feet in width through this roadway section. An emergency access gate, approved by the Renton fire Department, can be installed where this roadway enters the new plat. If this private easement is replaced in the future with dedicated public right-of-way, the emergency access gate shall be removed. A note to this effect is to be included on the final plat. You have 14 days from the date of this letter to appeal the administrative determination in accordance with City code. Appeals are to be filed in writing, with the City Clerk, and require a filing fee in the amount of $250.00. Appeals must be filed with the City Clerk before Tuesday, !'November 24, 2009, at 5:00 p -m. You may contact Kayren Kittrick at (425) 430-7299 if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, Neil Watts, Director Development Services Division cc: Alex Pietsch, Community & Economic Development Administrator Chip Vincent, Planning Director Kayren Kittrick, Development Engineering Supervisor Jerry Wasser, Associate Planner AGENDA ITEM #7. b) DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY City of AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL (SEPA) DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE MITIGATED (DNS -M) APPLICATION NO(S): LUA09-140, ECF, PP APPLICANT: Steve Beck, Amberwood LLC PROJECT NAME: Wilson Park Preliminary Plat DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and approval of a Preliminary Plat for the subdivision of a 108,884 square foot (2.5 acre) parcel in the R-1, R-8 and R-14 zones and in the Urban Separator Overlay. The original proposal encompassed 13 -lots and 4 -tracts (for open space and storm detention). The revised proposal encompasses 12 -lots and 3 -tracts (for open space). A portion of proposed Lot 12 would also contain an open space easement. A proposed stormwater vault would be located under the proposed access road. Proposed lots range in size from 4,500 to 13,006 square feet with a density of 7.99 dwelling units per acre. The proposed lots are intended for the future construction of single family residences. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 720 S 55th Street LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Environmental Review Committee Department of Community & Economic Development The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on March 12, 2010. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8- 110.6. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. PUBLICATION DATE: DATE OF DECISION: SIGNATURES: February 26, 2010 February 22, 2010 Z Z,7, Gregg zi m rma , Administrator Mark eterson I terim Administrator Public or s D artment Date Fire Emer enc S. ices Terry Higashiyama, Administrator Alex Pietsch, Administrator Community Services Department Date Department of Community & Economic Development 2 .z /0 Date Date AGENDA ITEM #7. b) AB - 2194 City Council Regular Meeting - 06 Aug 2018 SUBJECT/TITLE: Contract Award: Falcon Ridge Lift Station Replacement and Force Main Improvements; CAG-18-120 RECOMMENDED ACTION: Refer to Utilities Committee DEPARTMENT: City Clerk STAFF CONTACT: Jason Seth, City Clerk EXT.: 6502 FISCAL IMPACT SUMMARY: $926,502.50. The total budget for this project is $1,000,000. The budget amount is not sufficient to cover contingency construction costs and the engineering consultant services during construction, therefore a transfer of $250,000 from the Thunder Hill Interceptor Rehabilitation project (426.465495) to this project account (426.465480) is being requested. The engineer's estimate is $960,520. SUMMARY OF ACTION: The City Clerk's Office conducted a bid opening for the Falcon Ridge Lift Station Replacement and Force Main Improvements project on July 31, 2018. In compliance with Council policies, the bid opening met the following three requirements: 1) There was more than one bid; 2) There were no irregularities with the lowest responsible and responsive bid; 3) The lowest responsible and responsive bid was within budget. However, there is insufficient budget to accommodate the contingency construction costs and the engineering consultant services during construction. Therefore, staff recommends Council award the Falcon Ridge Lift Station Replacement and Force Main Improvement project to Road Construction Northwest, Inc., in the amount of $926,502.50; AND refer this item to the Utilities Committee to consider transferring $250,000 from the Thunder Hill Interceptor Rehabilitation project to this project. EXHIBITS: A. Staff Recommendation B. Bid Tab STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Accept the lowest responsible and responsive bid and award the F alcon Ridge Lift Station Replacement and Force Main Improvement project to Road Construction Northwest, Inc., in the amount of $926,502.50; and transfer $250,000 from the Thunder Hill Interceptor Rehabilitation project to this project. AGENDA ITEM #7. c) PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT c«yof MEMORANDUMton DATE: August 1, 2018 CITY OF RENTONTO: Jason Seth, City Clerk AUG 01 2018FROM: Michael Benoit, Wastewater Utility, x7206 CITYC ECEIVEDSUBJECT: Bid Award RK'S OFFICE Falcon Ridge Lift Station Replacement and Force Main Improvements, CAG-18-120 The Public Works Department has reviewed the bids that were submitted for the Falcon Ridge Lift Station Replacement and Force Main Improvements project and we recommend that the bid be awarded to Road Construction Northwest, Inc. We are requesting that an agenda bill for "refer to Utilities Committee" be prepared for the August 6, 2018, Council Meeting. We would further request that the item be scheduled for the August 9th Utility Committee meeting. The bid opening was on Tuesday,July 31, 2018. There were seven bids received. There were no errors of significance on any of the bids. The low bidder is Road Construction Northwest, Inc. with a bid of$926,502.50. The engineer's estimate was $960,520. The project budget amount for the Falcon Ridge Lift Station Replacement and Force Main Improvements project (426.465480) is $1,000,000. The budgeted amount is not sufficient to cover the contingency construction cost and the engineering consultant services during construction. As part of the award, the Wastewater Utility is requesting a budget transfer of$250,000 from Thunder Hill Interceptor Rehabilitation project (426.465495)to Falcon Ridge Lift Station Replacement and Force Main Improvements project (426.465480). The proposed $1,250,000 budget for Falcon Ridge Lift Station Replacement and Force Main Improvements project will be sufficient to cover the bid amount plus an approximate 20%contingency, the engineering contract, and staff time. The project will replace the aging Falcon Ridge Lift Station with a new station that meets our current standards for reliability and maintainability. The project will also provide improvements to the existing force main to improve inspection and maintainability. H:\File Sys\WWP-WasteWater\WWP-27-03939 Falcon Ridge Lift Station Replacement\Bid Document\Awa rd-Clerk- Falcon Ridge Lift Station.doc/MAB AGENDA ITEM #7. c) Mr.Seth Page 2 of 2 August 15,2012 Attached for your reference, is the bid tabulation showing the engineer's estimate,the low bid, and the other bids submitted. If you have any questions, please contact me at 425-430-7206 or by email at mbenoit@rentonwa.gov. Attachments cc: Gregg Zimmerman,PW Administrator Lys Hornsby,Utility Systems Director Dave Christensen,Wastewater Utility Supervisor H:\File Sys\WWP-Waste Water\WWP-27-03939 Falcon Ridge Lift Station Replacement\Bid Document\Award-Clerk- Falcon Ridge Lift Station.doc\JDHah AGENDA ITEM #7. c) Project Title:Falcon Ridge Lift Station City of Renton Road Construction Northwest McClure & Sons BID DATE:DATE Engineers Estimate Bars Item Unit Est.Unit Bid Unit Bid Unit Bid No. No.Description Quantity Price Amount Price Amount Price Amount 1 Mobilization, Demobilization, Site Preparation, Cleanup Lump Sum 1 40,300.00 40,300.00 80,000.00 80,000.00 50,000.00 50,000.00 2 Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Lump Sum 1 6,200.00 6,200.00 11,000.00 11,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 3 Site Utility Work Lump Sum 1 137,700.00 137,700.00 90,000.00 90,000.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 4 Unscheduled Excavation Cubic Yard 30 50.00 1,500.00 40.00 1,200.00 35.00 1,050.00 5 Unscheduled Structural Backfill Ton 60 75.00 4,500.00 40.00 2,400.00 40.00 2,400.00 6 Traffic Control Lump Sum 1 8,400.00 8,400.00 7,500.00 7,500.00 5,200.00 5,200.00 7 Trench Safety and Shoring Lump Sum 1 16,900.00 16,900.00 13,000.00 13,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 8 Air Vacuum Release Assembly Lump Sum 1 8,600.00 8,600.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 12,000.00 12,000.00 9 Forcemain Access Manhole Each 7 3,500.00 24,500.00 6,775.00 47,425.00 11,500.00 80,500.00 10 Radio Frequency Identification Device (RFID) Installation Each 7 600.00 4,200.00 250.00 1,750.00 400.00 2,800.00 11 Radio Frequency Identification Device Data Process and Delivery Lump Sum 1 1,500.00 1,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 12 Road Repair Square Foot 5,500 7.00 38,500.00 2.00 11,000.00 5.00 27,500.00 13 Seal Coat Lump Sum 1 25,600.00 25,600.00 11,000.00 11,000.00 25,000.00 25,000.00 14 Dewatering Lump Sum 1 3,300.00 3,300.00 20,000.00 20,000.00 15,000.00 15,000.00 15 Lift Station Structural Lump Sum 1 87,300.00 87,300.00 143,000.00 143,000.00 110,000.00 110,000.00 16 Electrical Building Structural Lump Sum 1 65,000.00 65,000.00 60,000.00 60,000.00 50,000.00 50,000.00 17 Lift Station Pumps and Motors Lump Sum 1 40,000.00 40,000.00 65,000.00 65,000.00 75,000.00 75,000.00 18 Mechanical Lump Sum 1 46,800.00 46,800.00 37,000.00 37,000.00 65,000.00 65,000.00 19 Electrical Lump Sum 1 149,100.00 149,100.00 146,500.00 146,500.00 180,000.00 180,000.00 20 Automatic Control Lump Sum 1 138,400.00 138,400.00 57,000.00 57,000.00 65,000.00 65,000.00 21 Finishes Lump Sum 1 7,400.00 7,400.00 6,500.00 6,500.00 46,047.00 46,047.00 22 O&M Manuals and On-Site Training Lump Sum 1 2,500.00 2,500.00 2,500.00 2,500.00 2,500.00 2,500.00 23 Construction Records Lump Sum 1 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 24 Minor Change Lump Sum 1 10,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 Subtotal $873,200.00 $842,275.00 $935,997.00 Sales Tax $87,320.00 $84,227.50 $93,599.70 Total $960,520.00 $926,502.50 $1,029,596.70 AGENDA ITEM #7. c) Project Title:Falcon Ridge Lift Station BID DATE:DATE Bars Item Unit Est. No. No.Description Quantity 1 Mobilization, Demobilization, Site Preparation, Cleanup Lump Sum 1 2 Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Lump Sum 1 3 Site Utility Work Lump Sum 1 4 Unscheduled Excavation Cubic Yard 30 5 Unscheduled Structural Backfill Ton 60 6 Traffic Control Lump Sum 1 7 Trench Safety and Shoring Lump Sum 1 8 Air Vacuum Release Assembly Lump Sum 1 9 Forcemain Access Manhole Each 7 10 Radio Frequency Identification Device (RFID) Installation Each 7 11 Radio Frequency Identification Device Data Process and Delivery Lump Sum 1 12 Road Repair Square Foot 5,500 13 Seal Coat Lump Sum 1 14 Dewatering Lump Sum 1 15 Lift Station Structural Lump Sum 1 16 Electrical Building Structural Lump Sum 1 17 Lift Station Pumps and Motors Lump Sum 1 18 Mechanical Lump Sum 1 19 Electrical Lump Sum 1 20 Automatic Control Lump Sum 1 21 Finishes Lump Sum 1 22 O&M Manuals and On-Site Training Lump Sum 1 23 Construction Records Lump Sum 1 24 Minor Change Lump Sum 1 Subtotal Sales Tax Total Gary Harper Construction Award Construction James W Fowler Unit Bid Unit Bid Unit Bid Price Amount Price Amount Price Amount 56,500.00 56,500.00 65,000.00 65,000.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 2,700.00 2,700.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 6,000.00 6,000.00 98,200.00 98,200.00 200,000.00 200,000.00 152,000.00 152,000.00 34.00 1,020.00 135.00 4,050.00 50.00 1,500.00 30.00 1,800.00 42.00 2,520.00 60.00 3,600.00 8,500.00 8,500.00 36,000.00 36,000.00 13,750.00 13,750.00 9,100.00 9,100.00 16,700.00 16,700.00 13,500.00 13,500.00 10,200.00 10,200.00 14,000.00 14,000.00 9,875.00 9,875.00 10,170.00 71,190.00 9,500.00 66,500.00 11,500.00 80,500.00 2,070.00 14,490.00 1,775.00 12,425.00 4,500.00 31,500.00 2,400.00 2,400.00 4,000.00 4,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 5.57 30,635.00 10.50 57,750.00 10.50 57,750.00 8,900.00 8,900.00 6,000.00 6,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 1,300.00 1,300.00 2,100.00 2,100.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 198,500.00 198,500.00 118,000.00 118,000.00 169,000.00 169,000.00 83,100.00 83,100.00 55,000.00 55,000.00 65,000.00 65,000.00 60,000.00 60,000.00 60,000.00 60,000.00 62,950.00 62,950.00 48,100.00 48,100.00 64,000.00 64,000.00 43,125.00 43,125.00 187,500.00 187,500.00 170,000.00 170,000.00 146,782.00 146,782.00 61,200.00 61,200.00 60,000.00 60,000.00 69,000.00 69,000.00 30,200.00 30,200.00 29,000.00 29,000.00 20,000.00 20,000.00 2,500.00 2,500.00 2,500.00 2,500.00 2,500.00 2,500.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 $1,003,035.00 $1,065,545.00 $1,083,332.00 $100,303.50 $106,554.50 $108,333.20 $1,103,338.50 $1,172,099.50 $1,191,665.20 * Red indicates error in bid AGENDA ITEM #7. c) Project Title:Falcon Ridge Lift Station BID DATE:DATE Bars Item Unit Est. No. No.Description Quantity 1 Mobilization, Demobilization, Site Preparation, Cleanup Lump Sum 1 2 Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Lump Sum 1 3 Site Utility Work Lump Sum 1 4 Unscheduled Excavation Cubic Yard 30 5 Unscheduled Structural Backfill Ton 60 6 Traffic Control Lump Sum 1 7 Trench Safety and Shoring Lump Sum 1 8 Air Vacuum Release Assembly Lump Sum 1 9 Forcemain Access Manhole Each 7 10 Radio Frequency Identification Device (RFID) Installation Each 7 11 Radio Frequency Identification Device Data Process and Delivery Lump Sum 1 12 Road Repair Square Foot 5,500 13 Seal Coat Lump Sum 1 14 Dewatering Lump Sum 1 15 Lift Station Structural Lump Sum 1 16 Electrical Building Structural Lump Sum 1 17 Lift Station Pumps and Motors Lump Sum 1 18 Mechanical Lump Sum 1 19 Electrical Lump Sum 1 20 Automatic Control Lump Sum 1 21 Finishes Lump Sum 1 22 O&M Manuals and On-Site Training Lump Sum 1 23 Construction Records Lump Sum 1 24 Minor Change Lump Sum 1 Subtotal Sales Tax Total Harbor Pacific Titan Earthwork Average Bid Unit Bid Unit Bid Unit Bid Price Amount Price Amount Price Amount 75,000.00 75,000.00 130,000.00 130,000.00 79500.00 79,500.00 20,000.00 20,000.00 45,000.00 45,000.00 13100.00 13,100.00 230,000.00 230,000.00 228,961.00 228,961.00 157023.00 157,023.00 48.60 1,458.00 114.00 3,420.00 65.23 1,956.86 35.80 2,148.00 53.00 3,180.00 42.97 2,578.29 75,000.00 75,000.00 50,000.00 50,000.00 27992.86 27,992.86 15,000.00 15,000.00 37,160.00 37,160.00 15208.57 15,208.57 8,100.00 8,100.00 9,000.00 9,000.00 10453.57 10,453.57 9,100.00 63,700.00 13,000.00 91,000.00 10220.71 71,545.00 2,890.00 20,230.00 4,000.00 28,000.00 2269.29 15,885.00 2,300.00 2,300.00 2,800.00 2,800.00 3142.86 3,142.86 11.80 64,900.00 7.40 40,700.00 7.54 41,462.14 14,500.00 14,500.00 10,500.00 10,500.00 12271.43 12,271.43 3,400.00 3,400.00 35,000.00 35,000.00 11685.71 11,685.71 80,000.00 80,000.00 115,000.00 115,000.00 133357.14 133,357.14 110,000.00 110,000.00 37,260.00 37,260.00 65765.71 65,765.71 65,000.00 65,000.00 106,500.00 106,500.00 70635.71 70,635.71 68,884.00 68,884.00 55,775.00 55,775.00 54554.86 54,554.86 160,000.00 160,000.00 121,760.00 121,760.00 158934.57 158,934.57 60,800.00 60,800.00 149,087.00 149,087.00 74583.86 74,583.86 26,000.00 26,000.00 17,620.00 17,620.00 25052.43 25,052.43 2,500.00 2,500.00 2,500.00 2,500.00 2500.00 2,500.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 5000.00 5,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 10000.00 10,000.00 $1,183,920.00 $1,335,223.00 $1,064,189.57 $118,392.00 $133,522.30 $106,418.96 $1,302,312.00 $1,468,745.30 $1,170,608.53 AGENDA ITEM #7. c) Project Title:Falcon Ridge Lift Station BID DATE:DATE Bars Item Unit Est. No. No.Description Quantity 1 Mobilization, Demobilization, Site Preparation, Cleanup Lump Sum 1 2 Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Lump Sum 1 3 Site Utility Work Lump Sum 1 4 Unscheduled Excavation Cubic Yard 30 5 Unscheduled Structural Backfill Ton 60 6 Traffic Control Lump Sum 1 7 Trench Safety and Shoring Lump Sum 1 8 Air Vacuum Release Assembly Lump Sum 1 9 Forcemain Access Manhole Each 7 10 Radio Frequency Identification Device (RFID) Installation Each 7 11 Radio Frequency Identification Device Data Process and Delivery Lump Sum 1 12 Road Repair Square Foot 5,500 13 Seal Coat Lump Sum 1 14 Dewatering Lump Sum 1 15 Lift Station Structural Lump Sum 1 16 Electrical Building Structural Lump Sum 1 17 Lift Station Pumps and Motors Lump Sum 1 18 Mechanical Lump Sum 1 19 Electrical Lump Sum 1 20 Automatic Control Lump Sum 1 21 Finishes Lump Sum 1 22 O&M Manuals and On-Site Training Lump Sum 1 23 Construction Records Lump Sum 1 24 Minor Change Lump Sum 1 Subtotal Sales Tax Total Compared to Engineer Estimate Unit Bid Price Amount 199% 177% 65% 80% 53% 89% 77% 116% 194% 42% 233% 29% 43% 606% 164% 92% 163% 79% 98% 41% 88% 100% 100% 100% 96%AGENDA ITEM #7. c) Project:Falcon Ridge Lift Station Replacement Force Main ImprovementsCAG‐18‐120Date: 7/31/2018CITY OF RENTONBID TABULATION SHEET1 of 3 Bid Total fromProp L&I Bid Schedule of Adden 1 Hour 24 HoursSchedule of PricesTrippl Form Cert Bond Prices No. 1 Sub List Cert of Comp.*Includes Sales TaxAward Construction, Inc.900 Willeys Lake Road1FerndaleX X X X X X X $1,173,099.50WA98248B. ToddVaseyGary Harper Construction, Inc.14831 223rd Street SE2SnohomishX X X X X X X $1,103,338.50WA98296Gary HarperHarbor Pacific Contractors, Inc.19628 144th Avenue NE, Suite A3WoodinvilleX X X X X X X $1,302,312.00WA98072NicholasDeVitisBidderFORMSEngineer's EstimateApprox. $960,520.00 AGENDA ITEM #7. c) Project:Falcon Ridge Lift Station Replacement Force Main ImprovementsCAG‐18‐120Date: 7/31/2018CITY OF RENTONBID TABULATION SHEET2 of 3 Bid Total fromProp L&I Bid Schedule of Adden 1 Hour 24 HoursSchedule of PricesTrippl Form Cert Bond Prices No. 1 Sub List Cert of Comp.*Includes Sales TaxBidderFORMSJames W. Fowler, Co.12775 Westview Drive4DallasX X X X X X X $1,191,665.20OR97338James  FowlerMcClure & Sons, Inc.15714 Country Club Drive5Mill CreekX X X X X X X $1,029,597.00WA98012Les McClure  Road Construction Northwest, Inc.P.O. Box 2286RentonX X X X X X X $926,502.50WA98056MatthewWeagsterEngineer's EstimateApprox. $960,520.00 AGENDA ITEM #7. c) Project:Falcon Ridge Lift Station Replacement Force Main ImprovementsCAG‐18‐120Date: 7/31/2018CITY OF RENTONBID TABULATION SHEET3 of 3 Bid Total fromProp L&I Bid Schedule of Adden 1 Hour 24 HoursSchedule of PricesTrippl Form Cert Bond Prices No. 1 Sub List Cert of Comp.*Includes Sales TaxBidderFORMSTitan Earthwork, LLC.1585 Valentine Avenue SE7PacificX X X X 0 X X $1,468,745.30WA98047BrettMcKenzieEngineer's EstimateApprox. $960,520.00 AGENDA ITEM #7. c) AB - 2184 City Council Regular Meeting - 06 Aug 2018 SUBJECT/TITLE: Microsoft Enterprise Licenses True-up Renewal RECOMMENDED ACTION: Refer to Finance Committee DEPARTMENT: Administrative Services Department STAFF CONTACT: Mehdi Sadri, Information Technology Director EXT.: 6886 FISCAL IMPACT SUMMARY: As part of the 2017/2018 Budget, Council approved funds for the yearly renewal of IT's Microsoft Enterprise Licenses True-up renewal in the amount of $143,391.06 plus tax for a total of $157,730.17. SUMMARY OF ACTION: As part of the 2017/2018 IT Budget, Council approved funds for IT's yearly renewal of the Microsoft Enterprise Licenses True-Up. Yearly cost is $143,391 plus 10% sales tax for a total of $157,730.17. IT requests authorization to renew. EXHIBITS: A. Purchase Order B. Quote STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Authorize and sign En Pointe Technology purchase order in the amount of $157,730.17 for the renewal of Microsoft Enterprise Licenses True-up. AGENDA ITEM #7. d) VENDOR: FOB Polnt: Terms: Req.Del.Date: Special Inst: CITY OF RENTON 1055 S.GRADY WAY RENTON,WA 98057 024305 EN POINTE TECHNOLOGIESSALES.LLC PO BOX 740545 LOS ANGELES,CA 90074-0545 net term 30 Pre-Assigned PO#?:No Unlt Description Unit Price Ext.PriceQuantity W06-01072 CoreCAL ALNG SA MVLPltfITn UsrCAL750 $3899 $29,242 50 269-12442 Of?oeProPlusALNGSA MVL Pltfrm 750 $79 11 $59 332 50 KV3~00353VVlNE3perDVCALNG SA MVL Pltfrm 750 $34 90 $26 175.00 965—0O002AzureAc1|veDrc1ryBscShrdsvr ALNG SubsVL MVLPerUsr 5 $8 64 $43.20 395-02504 ExchgSvrEnt ALNG SA MVL1 $654.48 $654.48 312-02257 ExchgSvrStd ALNG SA MVL 1 $114.30 $114.30 076-01912 PrjctALNG SA MVL1 $105.53 $105.53 H04-00268 SharePointSvrALNGSA MVL1 $1,098.43 $1,098.43 7NQ-00292 SQLSvrStdCore ALNG SA MVL 2Lic CoreLIc24 $579 29 $13,902.96 BILL TO: Account Number E 503 000000 004 5 8.82 4 003 Wurk Order Functlon Number SU BTOTAL TAX FREIGHT TOTAL Amount DATE 7/16/2018 Page1l2 P0 NUMBER 04/000428 Req.No.: Dept: Con?-‘M1 AGENDA ITEM #7. d) am]Eu?|s pazuouunv 8.|l’l]EU5!Sp8I|.l0I?I'|V wnoulv 19¢!“-|"N "0031-"'|§JUNO 310M JOQIIHINaunoazrv LL’0€L'L9L 000 000 LICOELASL ‘lVJ.Ol LHQEHJ XV]. '1VJ.O.l.EHS GU09aq ||!M ‘s,v3 ?unsgxe ,s.Ia ‘<3Klnrem‘-> Jo;ezugod u awuojua ya me oxsnouo s1uauM 9)62921.31-0 DU 0;suoauemuos my map doog eAgpa;,la emmunauoammuoso;szuaumedaxeu:ueo s.Iau1o1sno d |enuue J05 -suuo;daco awxedase;s|dwoo 01 pan mu mmsxeuunsng ‘(LL03 (LL02 ‘SZ‘BIN9/‘D/03149)M9N SQGSLEII-0'5-|9q'-U|'"-I V3 JGDUHSW90-||l0JU9 5U!!5!X3 ox;Janesm mo a?ueuoo1 uuo;(doog)Jeuued [euueqa ;o esueuo2pau?gs 330 501 THE sag?olouqoei azugod L33q?nonp sen?oyouuoel exugod ug uauesaaMeN , $ XEJ_sa|es ‘g 98 OLZS 98'0LZ$L3!'|31°3 9!'I9l "IAINVS 9N'IV 3J°OP3S9lSS|O 0 L€O0'V96 1'|»966 L$LS‘ZV|-$VI»°!'l3J°O 3!'l9t ‘IAWVS E)N'lV 9J°OC|J.SMS'-'W\L9Z00‘W36 09 Z96 SS OL‘V66$6 °!'|9J°C)3!'l9l~ ‘IAINVS 9N'IV 9-'°OOClMSUW\€LZOO‘V36 L150L6$6€'€0€$ ‘E‘IAW VS 9N'1V NC|S|NqnS°JdSA 1-Ll«0O'C|Ll. 9?‘187$6Z‘06$ 9 W/\|N VS ONTV°1d°!5V\69tLO‘l.9G VZZ71-S8L‘Ll-38 3!'|9J°O °!1Z "I/\WVS E)N'|V 910391811355896I-00'NEl6 9911:!V5 9°|«|d Ilu?uo?uasaq nun Kmueno $837000/V0 HBSWDN Od °N 1£.#Od P°U5!55V'°«'d 3N|J.S|HHO 'E|SElElS nouuoo :1doa 2'0"‘boy 101 dlHS 8 L02/9l«A 3.LVO :;su||e|:Iads 19320 ‘I90 ‘boa 09 LUJ9119U :suuaJ_ 91:90-vzooeV0 ‘SEFIEISNVS01 svson X08 Od OT!‘SEFIVSSEIl90‘lONH03.L 3J.NIOd NEI 908720 zuoaua/\ £9086 VM ‘Nomaa AVM AGVH9 '3 99m NO.I.NElH:l0 A.I.IO Ill-|l°d E05 AGENDA ITEM #7. d) City of Renton:YR 2 -8/31/ 20172- Annual Price Year 2 Product Qty Price Extended W06-01072 CoreCAL ALNGSA MVLPltfrm UsrCAL 750 S 3899 3 29,242.50 269-12442 0fficeProP|us ALNGSA MVLPltfrm 750 S 59,332.50 E-00353 WINE3perDVC ALNGSA MVLPltfrm 34.90 26,175.00 965-00002 AzureActiveDrctryBsc Shrdsvr ALNGSubsVL MVLPerUsr 43.20 395-02504 ExchgSvrEnt ALNGSA MVL .654.48 312-02257 Exchgsvrstd ALNGSA MVL .114.30 076-01912 Prjct ALNGSA MVL 105.53 H04-00263 SharePointSVrALNGSA MVL 1,098.43 7NQ-00292 |SQ|SvrStdCoreALNGSA MVL2Lic CoreLic 13,902.96 9EN-00198 SysCtrStdCore ALNGSA MVL2Lic CoreLic 142.24 D87-01159 VisioPro ALNGSA MVL 451.45 VSProSubMSDNALNGSA MVL 910. 1779EA-00273 WinSvrDCCore ALNGSA MVL16Lic CoreLic 8,952.30 9EM-00267 WinSvrSTDCore ALNGSA MVL16Lic CoreLic 1,995.14 9GA-00310 C|SSteStdCore ALNGSA MVL16Lic CoreLic 143,391. POINTE Mehdi Sadri <MSadri@Rentonwa.gov> D DDDUE! UEIDEI DDEIDEI AGENDA ITEM #7. d) AGENDA ITEM #7. d) AB - 2187 City Council Regular Meeting - 06 Aug 2018 SUBJECT/TITLE: Consortium Fiber Optic Project 73 - Feasibility Study Eastside Rail Corridor RECOMMENDED ACTION: Refer to Finance Committee DEPARTMENT: Administrative Services Department STAFF CONTACT: Ron Hansen, Network Systems Manager EXT.: 6873 FISCAL IMPACT SUMMARY: The C3 - Eastside Rail Corridor fiber feasibility study total cost is $109,000, shared between members of the Connectivity Consortium participants. City of Renton's contrib ution is $10,000 which will be absorbed using 2017/2018 IT budget funds. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Council approved an updated and expanded interlocal agreement that consolidates the Eastside Fiber Consortium (ERC) and government agencies in the Valley Cities group into the “Community Connectivity Consortium” (C3) to jointly construct, manage, and share fiber optic resources in August of 2011. The City of Renton and the Fiber Consortium have worked under this Consortium Agreement and partnered on a number of projects which have resulted in many schools and City facilities within the community being connected with high-speed fiber optic connections as well as getting access to fiber and facilities outside the City. The ERC passes through several C3 member cities, and a potential development of fiber optic infrastructure in the ERC could benefit these C3 members. As such, the participants in this project agreement agree to contribute funds toward the completion of the feasibility study. The work to complete this study is fully defined in the Scope of Work (SOW) negotiated between the City of Kirkland (the lead agency) and Columbia Telecommunications Corporation (CTC). EXHIBITS: A. Issue Paper B. Consortium Project Agreement 73 C. Resolution STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Interlocal Agreement and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign Consortium Fiber Proje ct Agreement 73 to be executed with participating agencies. AGENDA ITEM #7. e) ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES M E M O R A N D U M DATE:August 6, 2018 TO:Ed Prince, Council President Members of Renton City Council CC:Denis Law, Mayor Robert Harrison, Chief Administrative Officer FROM:Mehdi Sadri, Information Technology Director STAFF CONTACT:Ron Hansen, Network Systems Manager SUBJECT:Consortium Fiber Project Agreement 73, feasibility study to utilize ERC as a fiber optic infrastructure corridor ISSUE: Should the City approve Consortium Fiber Project Agreement to conduct a feasibility study to utilize the East-side Rail Corridor (ERC) as a fiber optic infrastructure corridor? RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Consortium Fiber Project Agreement. BACKGROUND SUMMARY: Council approved an updated and expanded interlocal agreement that consolidates the Eastside Fiber Consortium and government agencies in the Valley Cities group into the “Community Connectivity Consortium” to jointly construct, manage, and share fiber optic resources in August of 2011. The City of Renton and the Fiber Consortium have worked under this Consortium Agreement and partnered on a number of projects which have resulted in many schools and City facilities within the community being connected with high-speed fiber optic connections as well as getting access to fiber and facilities outside the City. The ERC passes through several C3 member cities, and a potential development of fiber optic infrastructure in the ERC could benefit these C3 members. As such, the participants in this project agreement agree to contribute funds toward the completion of the feasibility study. The work to complete this study is fully defined in the Scope of Work (SOW) negotiated between the City of Kirkland (the lead agency) and CTC. AGENDA ITEM #7. e) Addressee Name Page 2 of 3 Date of Memo Participating agencies obligations: Project Participant Contribution City of Kirkland *$18,000 Lake Washington School District $10,000 King County $25,000 City of Bellevue $10,000 Bellevue School District $10,000 City of Redmond $10,000 City of Renton $10,000 Renton Schools $6,000 C3 Consortium (Contingency Funds)UP TO $10,000 Total (Including Contingency Funds)$109,000 Participating Agencies benefit from this study in the following ways: Receive a copy of final deliverables Better informed on options to achieve a major north-south fiber infrastructure route that is unrestricted, a major C3 goal Ability to shape business and infrastructure strategies that can enhance each participating agency’s mission and contribute to the broader region’s resiliency CONCLUSION: Staff recommends that the City Council approve the Interlocal Agreement and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the Consortium Fiber Project Agreement to be executed with participating agencies. cc: Jason Seth, City Clerk Jan Hawn, Administrative Services Administrator AGENDA ITEM #7. e) Addressee Name Page 3 of 3 Date of Memo AGENDA ITEM #7. e) C3 Project Agreement 73 Page 1 of 21 Consortium Project Agreement 73 City of Kirkland 123 5th Ave Kirkland, WA 98033 City of Bellevue 450 110th Ave NE Bellevue, WA 98004 King County IT CNK-IT-600 401 Fifth Avenue, Suite 700 Seattle, WA 98104 Lake Washington School District P.O. Box 97039 Redmond, WA 98073 City of Redmond 15670 NE 85th St Redmond, WA 98052 City of Renton 1055 S Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 Renton School District 300 SW 7th St Renton, WA 98057 Bellevue School District 405 12111 NE 1st St Bellevue, WA 98005 Community Connectivity Consortium %Bellevue Information Technology 450 110th Ave NE Bellevue, WA 98004 Provides for named C3 members’ participation in the Eastside Rail Corridor (ERC) Fiber Optic Feasibility Study and defines each participating member’s contribution to the study. AGENDA ITEM #7. e) C3 Project Agreement 73 Page 2 of 21 Table of Contents Consortium Project Agreement 73...........................................................................................1 King County IT CNK-IT-600 401 Fifth Avenue, Suite 700 Seattle, WA 98104 ......................................1 Table of Contents.............................................................................................................................2 I. Project Description...........................................................................................................4 A. Project Number........................................................................................................................4 B. Project Name ...........................................................................................................................4 C. Project Description...................................................................................................................4 D. Lead Agency/ Project Manager.................................................................................................5 E. Participating Agencies..............................................................................................................5 F. Agreement Term......................................................................................................................5 II. Description of Project.......................................................................................................5 Scope of Work..................................................................................................................................5 A. Responsibilities of Lead Agency and Project Manager ..............................................................6 B. Responsibilities of Project Participants.....................................................................................6 C. Payment by Project Participants...............................................................................................7 III. Apportionment of and Limitation on Liability...............................................................7 I. Liability .......................................................................................................................................................7 II. Worker Insurance ......................................................................................................................................8 III. General Liability Insurance......................................................................................................................8 IV. Disclaimer, Third Party Components, and Exclusion of Damages ..................................9 V. Project Schedule.............................................................................................................11 VI. Miscellaneous............................................................................................................11 A. Modifications or Amendments...............................................................................................11 B. Counterparts..........................................................................................................................12 C. Authority................................................................................................................................12 VII. Approvals...................................................................................................................13 City of Kirkland...............................................................................................................................13 City of Bellevue...............................................................................................................................13 Community Connectivity Consortium .............................................................................................13 Project Agreement 73 Approvals (continued): ..................................................................................................14 Bellevue School District 405............................................................................................................14 King County....................................................................................................................................14 City of Redmond.............................................................................................................................14 AGENDA ITEM #7. e) C3 Project Agreement 73 Page 3 of 21 Project Agreement 73 Approvals (continued): ..................................................................................................15 City of Renton.................................................................................................................................15 Renton School District....................................................................................................................15 Lake Washington School District.....................................................................................................15 Addendum 1 – Statement of Work (CTC)................................................................................16 Overview............................................................................................................................................................17 Project Tasks......................................................................................................................................................17 Project Communications....................................................................................................................................21 Deliverables .......................................................................................................................................................21 AGENDA ITEM #7. e) C3 Project Agreement 73 Page 4 of 21 I. Project Description A. Project Number 73 B. Project Name C3 participation in ERC Fiber Optic Feasibility Study C. Project Description Following an RFP and negotiations, the City of Kirkland contemplates engaging Columbia Telecommunications Corporation (CTC) to perform a feasibility study to access the viability of building a high-capacity fiber optic infrastructure that runs the length of the Eastside Rail Corridor (ERC). The City of Kirkland, acting as the Lead Agency in this Project Agreement has agreed to collect and aggregate payments from project participants towards the payment of project funds to CTC. This Project Agreement memorializes the financial commitments of the participants, and when executed, will allow the City of Kirkland to execute the final Professional Services Agreement with CTC. The ERC passes through several C3 member cities, and a potential development of fiber optic infrastructure in the ERC could benefit these C3 members. As such, the participants in this project agreement agree to contribute funds toward the completion of the feasibility study. Some segments of the C3 Fiber Optic System currently traverse fiber routes whose traffic is restricted by agreements to non-commercial, public, education and governmental agency use only. Utilization of potential alternate fiber optic routes identified in the ERC could allow C3 members to increase their scope of usage. The work to complete this study is fully defined in the Scope of Work (SOW) negotiated between the city of Kirkland and CTC. Participating Agencies benefit from this study in the following ways: Receive a copy of final deliverables Better informed on options to achieve a major north-south fiber infrastructure route that is unrestricted, a major C3 goal Ability to shape business and infrastructure strategies that can enhance each participating agency’s mission and contribute to the broader region’s resiliency AGENDA ITEM #7. e) C3 Project Agreement 73 Page 5 of 21 D. Lead Agency/ Project Manager City of Kirkland/King County E. Participating Agencies City of Kirkland City of Bellevue Bellevue School District 405 City of Redmond City of Renton King County Lake Washington School District Renton School District F. Agreement Term This agreement will commence on the date of acceptance by all parties named in Section VII – Approvals and will terminate 60 days following delivery and acceptance of the final CTC Feasibility Study by the city of Kirkland. II. Description of Project Scope of Work The Scope of Work (SOW) for this project is fully set out in the agreement between the City of Kirkland and Columbia Telecommunications Corporation (CTC) which is incorporated in this document as Addendum 1. The SOW included in this document is a DRAFT SOW. Signatories to this Project Agreement agree that the Lead Agency and Project Manager have authority to approve the final SOW and make adjustments as needed throughout the life of that contract as long as the changes do not result in substantial material changes to this Project Agreement. CTC will deliver a feasibility study that focuses on the opportunities and long-term vision of the study participants’ utilization of the ERC as well as the expected development costs and timelines to utilize the ERC as a fiber optic infrastructure corridor. Commented [TK1]: The Charter and KCC do not allow an agency to contract to expend funds beyond the current biennium. “Funds” includes monetary payment and the commitment of County staff (whose positions are funded by the approved biennial budget). Will the term of this agreement extend beyond 12/31/18? If yes, then I recommend inserting a termination for non-appropriation clause or having the term end on 12/31/18 but be subject to extension which, KCIT, of course would do. AGENDA ITEM #7. e) C3 Project Agreement 73 Page 6 of 21 The study will deliver the following items: 1.A conceptual technical plan 2.A fiber engineering and cost estimate 3.A high-level business model A. Responsibilities of Lead Agency and Project Manager 1. The Lead Agency is responsible to coordinate the payments towards the project from each participant. 2. The Lead Agency is the responsible party for all matters relating to the contract with CTC. 3. The Project Manager will assist the Lead Agency by working with CTC to coordinate the project schedule. CTC will be responsible for submitting changes to the project schedule to the Lead Agency. 4. The Lead Agency will approve changes to the project scope in its contract with CTC where the Lead Agency determines that these changes are beneficial to the outcome of the project. 5. The Lead Agency may make reasonable changes to the project’s scope and deliverables, as recommended by CTC, without amendment to this Project Agreement so long as these changes do not incur an increase to the project cost or financial commitment of a Project participant. . 6. The Project Manager will assist the Lead Agency by working with CTC to coordinate stakeholder meetings and presentations. 7. The Project Manager will assist the Lead Agency by coordinating all ERC document requests between CTC and Project Participants. 8. The Project Manager’s overall function is to assist the Lead Agency in its administration of the Lead Agency’s contract with CTS. However, it is understood that the Project Manager is not an employee of the Lead Agency and shall remain under the supervisory authority of King County Information Technology, Regional Services, I-Net Business Manager. B. Responsibilities of Project Participants Project participants will contribute towards the completion of the study in the following manners: 1. Participate in stakeholder interviews with CTC to contribute their insights, needs and concerns 2. Provide (where permitted and applicable) any relevant maps, studies, documents or data to CTC for review as part of their work. 3. As needed, participate in conference calls or meetings with CTC and other participants to provide feedback and insights to CTC as part of their study. 4. Participate in the study’s final review process Commented [HD2]: Added clarity for roles and responsibility as it relates to the feasibility study and PM. Commented [PD3]: This addition should address most of Dominic’s input from V3. AGENDA ITEM #7. e) C3 Project Agreement 73 Page 7 of 21 C. Payment by Project Participants The project participants agree to contribute the amounts shown in the table below toward to overall cost of the ERC Feasibility Study. C3 agrees to allocate up to $10,000 as contingency funds for this project to be applied in the event that change orders or contract costs exceed $99,000. Release and payment of C3 contingency funds must be agreed to in writing as an addendum to this agreement by the City of Kirkland, King County, and C3. Payment of contingency funds must also be reported to the C3 Board of Directors at the next regularly scheduled C3 Board Meeting. The participants agree to make their agreed payments within 30 days of invoice receipt from the City of Kirkland. All payment obligations associated with this Project Agreement 73 shall be complete prior to December 31st, 2018 Project Participant Contribution City of Kirkland *$18,000 Lake Washington School District $10,000 King County $25,000 City of Bellevue $10,000 Bellevue School District $10,000 City of Redmond $10,000 City of Renton $10,000 Renton Schools $6,000 C3 Consortium (Contingency Funds)UP TO $10,000 Total (Including Contingency Funds)$109,000 * The City of Kirkland’s contribution of $18,000 includes a $10,000 contribution towards the project from the Pacific NW GigaPop (PNWGP). The partnership between PNWGP and the City of Kirkland is solely between the PNWGP and the City of Kirkland and is noted here to clearly define the overall contribution of the City of Kirkland. III. Apportionment of and Limitation on Liability I. Liability 1.Except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, each party shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the other parties, including their officers, officials, employees, agents, and regents, from and against any claim alleging harm, damage, injury, or loss to any person or property to the extent such claim arises Commented [TK4]: Shouldn’t C3 be a signatory to this agreement if it is agreeing to allocate money for a contingency fund? Commented [TK5]: Is this the amount of the CTC contract? Commented [TK6]: Again, is this payment made before or after 12/31/18? Commented [HD7]: Added clarity for when payment is due and capitalized “city” AGENDA ITEM #7. e) C3 Project Agreement 73 Page 8 of 21 out of or results from its own, or its employees' or agents' negligent acts or omissions, whether during construction or after completion of the project. 2.If a party uses contractors or subcontractors for work pursuant to this Agreement, then either (a) the party agrees that its obligations in Section I above will include responsibility for claims arising from the performance of such contractors and subcontractors, or (b) the party will include in its contract with any such contractor or subcontractor a provision requiring the contractor or subcontractor to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the other parties, including their officials, employees, and agents from and against any claim arising from the contractor's or subcontractor's performance. 3.The indemnity in Section I above is specifically and expressly intended to constitute a waiver of each party's immunity under the Washington Industrial Insurance Act, RCW Title 51, (a) only between and with regard to the parties, (b) only for work done by a party, and (c) only to the extent necessary to provide the indemnified party or parties with a full and complete indemnity of claims made by the indemnitor's employees. The parties acknowledge that these provisions were specifically negotiated and agreed upon by them. 4.Kirkland’s liability shall be limited to providing the service(s) described in this Project Agreement. Kirkland shall not be liable to any third party having a contractual relationship with CTC. II. Worker Insurance Each party to this Agreement shall ensure that it and all persons performing work on its behalf, including without limitation project suppliers and subcontractors, maintain in effect at all times during the Work, coverage or insurance in accordance with the applicable laws relating to worker's compensation and employer's liability insurance (including, but not limited to, the Washington Industrial Insurance Act and the laws of the state in which any such person was hired), regardless of whether such coverage or insurance is mandatory or merely elective under the law. Each party shall furnish such assurance and evidence of such coverage or insurance (such as copies of insurance policies and Certificates of Compliance issued by the Washington State Department of Labor and Industries) as Participating Agencies may request. III. General Liability Insurance. Each party to this Agreement shall maintain in full force and effect throughout Commented [PD8]: County would ask that a similar statement be added to similarly limit King County liability AGENDA ITEM #7. e) C3 Project Agreement 73 Page 9 of 21 the term of this Agreement, a minimum of Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000) liability insurance for property damage and bodily injury, and shall cause its agents, contractors, and subcontractors to maintain the same with regard to work under this Agreement. In satisfying the insurance requirements set forth in this section, a party may self-insure against such risks in such amounts as are reasonable for a municipality or agency of its size or shall obtain a coverage agreement through a Risk Pool authorized by Chapter 48.62 RCW which shall provide liability coverage to the party for the liabilities contractually assumed by the party in this Agreement. At the time of execution of this Agreement, and prior to commencement of performance of any of the Work, each party shall furnish, upon request, a Certificates of Insurance as evidence that policies providing insurance (or self-insurance) with such provisions, coverages and limits are in full force and effect. Lead Agency will insure that CTC includes King County as an additional insured party on their Certificate of Insurance as evidence that policies providing insurance (or self-insurance) with such provisions, coverages and limits are in full force and effect. IV.Disclaimer, Third Party Components, and Exclusion of Damages A. DISCLAIMER. ALL SERVICES AND ACTIVITIES PROVIDED BY A PARTY UNDER THIS AGREEMENT, , AND NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER PROVISION OF THIS AGREEMENT, ARE PROVIDED "AS IS". THE PARTIES ACCEPT SUCH ACTIVITIES, SERVICES AND THE SERVICE EQUIPMENT "AS IS," WITH NO REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, OR NON- INFRINGEMENT OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTY ARISING FROM STATUTE, COURSE OF DEALING, COURSE OF PERFORMANCE, OR USAGE OF TRADE. WITHOUT LIMITING THE GENERALITY OF THE FOREGOING, NO PARTY HAS ANY OBLIGATION TO INDEMNIFY OR DEFEND ANY OTHER PARTY AGAINST CLAIMS RELATED TO INFRINGEMENT OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS B. EXCLUSION OF DAMAGES. TO THE EXTENT ALLOWED BY LAW, AND NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER PROVISION OF THIS AGREEMENT, IN NO EVENT WILL ANY PARTY BE LIABLE TO ANY OTHER PARTY OR TO ANY THIRD PARTY FOR ANY LOST PROFITS (WHETHER DIRECT OR INDIRECT) OR LOSS OF DATA, COVER, SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES, OR FOR INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE, SPECIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES (INCLUDING DAMAGE TO BUSINESS, REPUTATION, OR GOODWILL), OR INDIRECT DAMAGES OF ANY TYPE HOWEVER CAUSED, WHETHER BY Commented [PD9]: King County wishes to add language naming County additional insured by CTC for the project Commented [PD10]: King County wishes to add language naming County additional insured by CTC for the project AGENDA ITEM #7. e) C3 Project Agreement 73 Page 10 of 21 BREACH OF CONTRACT, TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE), OR ANY OTHER LEGAL OR EQUITABLE CAUSE OF ACTION, EVEN IF THE PARTY HAS BEEN ADVISED OF SUCH DAMAGES IN ADVANCE OR IF SUCH DAMAGES WERE FORESEEABLE. AGENDA ITEM #7. e) C3 Project Agreement 73 Page 11 of 21 V. Project Schedule The Project Schedule shown below represents a draft project schedule, assuming that the project begins on September 4, 2018. As noted in the SOW, many of the project tasks listed below will be performed in parallel. The Project Schedule included in this document is a DRAFT Project Schedule. Signatories to this Project Agreement agree that the Lead Agency and Project Manager have authority to approve the final Project Schedule and make adjustments as needed throughout the life of that contract as long as the changes do not result in substantial material changes to this Project Agreement. Task Begin End Project Kick-off Meeting 9/4/18 9/7/18 Conceptual Technical Plan 9/7/18 Stakeholder Outreach 9/7/18 Engagement with permitting authorities and other agencies and governments Fiber Engineering and Cost Estimate Survey and document fiber routes Cost estimates Develop scope and responsibilities for portions of the route Development of a High-Level Business Model Business case analysis Benchmark pricing Data collection with potential customers Study Delivery Study Draft Review Process Final Study Acceptance Project Completion 12/31/18 VI. Miscellaneous A. Modifications or Amendments No modification to or amendment of the provisions of this Agreement shall be AGENDA ITEM #7. e) C3 Project Agreement 73 Page 12 of 21 effective unless in writing and signed by authorized representatives of the parties to this Agreement. The parties expressly reserve the right to modify this Agreement, from time to time, by mutual agreement as called for in the Project Agreement Template Policy. B. Counterparts This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which so executed will be deemed to be an original and such counterpart together will constitute on and the same agreement. C. Authority Each party hereby represents and warrants to the other parties that it has the right, powers, and authority to enter into this Agreement and to fully perform all of its obligations hereunder. AGENDA ITEM #7. e) C3 Project Agreement 73 Page 13 of 21 VII. Approvals IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Project Agreement on the respective dates indicated below. City of Kirkland __________________________ ______________ Signature Date __________________________ Name (Printed) __________________________ Title (Printed) City of Bellevue __________________________ ______________ Signature Date __________________________ Name (Printed) __________________________ Title (Printed) Community Connectivity Consortium __________________________ ______________ Signature Date __________________________ Name (Printed) __________________________ Title (Printed) AGENDA ITEM #7. e) C3 Project Agreement 73 Page 14 of 21 Project Agreement 73 Approvals (continued): Bellevue School District 405 __________________________ ______________ Signature Date __________________________ Name (Printed) __________________________ Title (Printed) King County __________________________ ______________ Signature Date __________________________ Name (Printed) __________________________ Title (Printed) City of Redmond __________________________ ______________ Signature Date __________________________ Name (Printed) __________________________ Title (Printed) AGENDA ITEM #7. e) C3 Project Agreement 73 Page 15 of 21 Project Agreement 73 Approvals (continued): City of Renton Renton School District __________________________ ______________ Signature Date __________________________ Name (Printed) __________________________ Title (Printed) Lake Washington School District __________________________ ______________ Signature Date __________________________ Name (Printed) __________________________ Title (Printed) AGENDA ITEM #7. e) C3 Project Agreement 73 Page 16 of 21 Addendum 1 – Statement of Work (CTC) July 6, 2018 Ms. Brenda Cooper Chief Information Officer Information Technology Department City of Kirkland 123 5th Ave. Kirkland, WA 98033 Subject: Revised expanded scope of work for Eastside Rail Corridor Feasibility Study Dear Brenda: As you requested, I’ve revised our scope of work to reflect your comments and those of your colleagues. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you would like to talk further. We look forward to working with you and your colleagues on this important initiative. Best regards, Joanne S. Hovis | President AGENDA ITEM #7. e) C3 Project Agreement 73 Page 17 of 21 Overview The project stakeholders (collectively referred to here as “the ERC Partners”) seek to assess the viability of building a high-capacity fiber optic infrastructure that runs the entire length of the Eastside Rail Corridor (ERC) to the northern border of King County, including the Redmond spur.1 This statement of work outlines the tasks that CTC Technology & Energy (CTC) proposes to undertake on the ERC Partners’ behalf to comprehensively examine the project requirements and opportunities, and to identify a fiber implementation plan and business model and sources of funding. CTC proposes to develop a technical and business analysis, conceptual designs and cost estimates, and a business model to help guide the project future steps. The goal of this effort is to enable the ERC Partners to capitalize on the construction within the ERC right-of-way and to bring a valuable resource to the ERC owners. CTC will provide the strategic analysis, recommendations, and constraints the ERC Partners need to understand whether such an initiative is realistic and feasible in terms of both technical and financial requirements. The ERC Partners’ consideration of this project is forward thinking. The development of the ERC project presents a unique, time-sensitive opportunity to share costs on a significant fiber backbone in a region where a lack of adequate fiber access may have a negative impact on local businesses and economic development. The feasibility study will not include examination or assessment of property rights or property interests along the ERC. CTC’s will use our extensive knowledge of the experiences, best practices, and results of similar initiatives in other communities nationwide for this study. Project Tasks Following a project kick-off meeting to introduce stakeholders (including representatives of any stakeholders that the ERC Partners’ project team chooses) and to establish the project’s goals and schedule, our engineer and business planner will review any relevant maps, studies, documents, or data that these stakeholders can share with us. Our review will focus on understanding the opportunities and long-term vision, as well as the expected development timeline and processes. Based on this initial information gathering, we will proceed with the primary project tasks—a series of interrelated steps that will be conducted in parallel, but that we list separately here for ease of review. 1 See, for example: “Creating Connections: Recommendations on the Eastside Rail Corridor from the Regional Advisory Council,” October 2013. See also: “Eastside Rail Corridor from the Regional Advisory Council,” http://www.kingcounty.gov/operations/erc-advisory-council.aspx AGENDA ITEM #7. e) C3 Project Agreement 73 Page 18 of 21 Task 1: Conceptual Technical Plan In this task, we will identify the required infrastructure and other technical considerations for providing services along the corridor and to adjacent areas. We will develop a high- level design and cost estimate for deploying a future-proof middle-mile fiber network that not only has sufficient capacity to meet the ERC Partners’ technical requirements for fiber-based broadband connectivity in this area, but also features excess fiber capacity that will enable future use and the corresponding long-term revenue that such future uses might provide. Stakeholder Outreach As a prerequisite to developing the fiber conceptual design and cost estimate, we will have on-site discussions with project stakeholders to establish a clear definition of the broadband connectivity requirements that the project will address, and to identify geographic and other considerations (e.g., underground construction) that will guide the network design. Drawing on our experience supporting numerous broadband network developments for many cities, counties, states, and non-profit entities, we will also seek to meet with representatives of other potential stakeholders and partners that might in the future want to partner on construction or become a fiber lessee. We will also engage with representatives of permitting authorities and other agencies government regarding the issues of planning fiber infrastructure deployment during other capital projects as a way to minimize costs. (We have in the past worked with ERC team members to develop long-term planning strategies for installing conduit for telecommunications.) We will address important factors such as: Developing ongoing relations and agreement with telecommunications providers Installing shared access points Creating shared equipment hubs Ensuring proper maintenance support This task will create the foundation for the following tasks and the recommendations we present in our final deliverable. Throughout this task we will be in regular contact with ERC Partners’ staff. Fiber Engineering and Cost Estimate We will develop a fiber plan (i.e., a map illustrating the potential placement of fiber throughout the corridor and adjacent target areas), a conceptual design, and a budgetary cost estimate for the fiber construction. We will identify candidate locations for last-mile service interconnection, recommend splice points, and determine whether there would need to be a peering point for service providers and municipal customers. AGENDA ITEM #7. e) C3 Project Agreement 73 Page 19 of 21 The primary focus of our conceptual design will be to develop a cost estimate for building fiber in the ERC to meet the needs of potential current and future users, with specific attention paid to optimizing economic development and supporting competitive services. We will develop a high-level design that is optimized to support the needs of the ERC Partners and other potential stakeholders, as well as to enable the ERC Partners access to fiber for future uses. The design will thus include excess fiber in the backbone to enable the ERC Partners to explore options for future expansion and service provisions. To survey candidate fiber routes and develop cost estimates, CTC engineers will perform both filed surveys and a desk survey of candidate fiber routing using ERC Partners-provided maps, Google Earth, and other data sources. We will include in our engineering analysis existing infrastructure (including rights-of-way access and locations for network hubs and other necessary infrastructure) that we believe the ERC Partners can use to support the backbone deployment. Among the issues we will address are the regulatory and permitting costs required to start construction, and a high-level assessment of how long construction might take. We will provide estimates in the form of a cost range, with the lower-end estimates representing most likely costs, and the higher-end representing budgetary estimates with suitable contingencies included. Budgetary estimates will include any studies or permits that are likely to be necessary. Our planning will also seek to ensure that the ERC Partners understand the scope of what it will need to build so that the infrastructure is future-proof and does not require retrofitting to move to new technologies. This will include addressing questions such as how the responsibility for specific portions of the construction might be divided among the ERC Partners, other public and non-profit stakeholders, and others that may share an interest in the initiative. To be clear, we will not be providing a blueprint-level network design. Rather, we will be providing a conceptual design and system-level overview of the potential infrastructure—which in turn will become a roadmap for future decisions, including detailed engineering and contracting for the fiber build-out along the ERC. Task 2: High-Level Business Model In collaboration with the ERC Partners, we will conduct meetings with potential private partners. For those potential partners that are local, the meetings would ideally be face to face; we would generally reserve telephone discussions for companies in other parts of the country that we have worked with on behalf of other municipal or county clients. The goal of this effort will be to determine whether there is a potential strategy to offset AGENDA ITEM #7. e) C3 Project Agreement 73 Page 20 of 21 the ERC Partners’ risk by sharing costs or enabling private sector deployment—or by some other mechanism that achieves the public sector goals of this initiative (i.e., meeting public sector communications needs, enabling use of excess fiber for last-mile deployment, and increasing the attractiveness and viability of the ERC) while mitigating public sector risk. We will then develop a business case analysis and high-level business model that provides recommendations and guidance on the likely roles of the ERC Partners and other stakeholders’ in project funding, ownership, and operation of the network infrastructure defined in the previous tasks.2 Our business planning will also include benchmarking pricing based on dark fiber pricing we see in comparable markets elsewhere. We will develop a financial model to determine the viability of the effort as a breakeven enterprise. In other words, we will seek to determine whether the revenues from dark fiber leases would potentially cover the ERC Partners’ costs, and whether it would be possible to make this effort work financially by offsetting costs through public – private partnerships of various sorts. The proposed business model will reflect our understanding of the ERC Partners’ position— driven by a mission to enhance community economic growth and job creation, but interested in identifying private sector motivation to develop this infrastructure. To the extent that we identify a public sector role, we will focus on also identifying a cost recovery model (whether short- or long-term) over time. We will also attempt to collect data through interviews with potential fiber customers, property developers, and the commercial real estate community along the corridor; we will gauge their interest in gaining access to new competitive service providers on a wholesale or retail basis and to gain insight into related issues of importance to these sectors. (We would request the ERC Partners’ help in making those connections, and would undertake one or two group meetings with these stakeholders if possible.) Throughout this task, we will be focused on developing the cost and revenue inputs for our high-level financial analysis. Customer insights gathered in this stage can also be further leveraged at a later time for marketing purposes. Drawing together all of the research, analysis, and recommendations developed in the previous steps, we will then prepare a high-level financial model that describes, based on a range of clearly identified assumptions, the potential revenue (if any) that the ERC Partners or a partner might see over the course of its fiber construction and operations. We will pay particular attention to evaluating the ERC Partners’ risk over time, and to 2 CTC is not qualified to provide legal advice. We recommend that the ERC Partners and other project stakeholders seek qualified legal counsel on any issues related to local or state laws or regulations as they relate to network planning. AGENDA ITEM #7. e) C3 Project Agreement 73 Page 21 of 21 answering the overarching question of whether there is a reasonable potential for cost recovery. To complement the financial and business model analysis, we will also develop a high- level strategic analysis of how this infrastructure, if it were deployed, would address many of the digital and broadband equity concerns of the public sector partners. To this end, we will review their digital inclusion and equity plans; conduct up to six calls with the stakeholders; and seek to build into the pricing plan and business recommendations strategies that would hopefully help to move the needle on digital equity matters. Project Communications As we discussed extensively on the phone, we commit to scheduling biweekly check-in calls with your project team to provide timely feedback and insight into what we find during our engineering process. We will also establish a file-sharing mechanism (e.g., SharePoint, Dropbox, FTP) for the ongoing, two-way transfer of data and maps. One of the goals of these ongoing communications will be to enable your project team to track emerging risks and challenges as we identify them—and to ensure that the final report does not include any surprises in terms of potential construction risk. While it is impossible to predict whether we will uncover any significant issues (such as significant environmental concerns) that might make the project financially infeasible, flagging any such issues early on will create the opportunity for an off-ramp for the project. That is, you will not have to proceed with subsequent stages of planning if we identify an issue that you determine might be a showstopper. Deliverables Our final deliverable will be a technical and business strategy with a conceptual network design, construction cost estimates, and fiber plan (map). We will identify strategic points of presence and describe potential business models (including a list of plausible partners). Our written report will include a clear and concise narrative supported by charts, tables, graphics, and maps, as appropriate. We will attribute and provide sourcing for our research. We will provide the ERC Partners’ identified reviewers with an electronic draft of our report for initial review. We will incorporate feedback and edits from reviewers within one week of receipt, and will deliver an electronic version of the final report. We will also present our strategic plan and recommendations via teleconference and in person at up to five meetings, to be scheduled following acceptance of the report. AGENDA ITEM #7. e) 1  CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON    RESOLUTION NO. _______    A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE  MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO ENTER INTO AN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WITH THE  CITY OF BELLEVUE, CITY OF KIRKLAND, CITY OF REDMOND, KING COUNTY,  BELLEVUE SCHOOL DISTRICT 405, LAKE WASHINGTON SCHOOL DISTRICT, AND  RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT, ENTITLED “CONSORTIUM PROJECT AGREEMENT 73,”  REGARDING THE EASTSIDE RAIL CORRIDOR (ERC) FIBER OPTIC FEASIBILITY  STUDY, WITH SUCH STUDY BEING A PROJECT OF THE COMMUNITY  CONNECTIVITY CONSORTIUM WHICH WAS PREVIOUSLY FORMED BY  INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT.     WHEREAS, in 2011, the City of Renton, together with other local governments and state  agencies, and pursuant to Chapter 39.34 RCW, entered into the Interlocal Agreement  Establishing the Community Connectivity Consortium, which entity was formed under the  authority of RCW 35.21.730 through 35.21.759 (“Consortium”); and  WHEREAS, since its creation, several other jurisdictions have joined the Consortium, and  the current members are the Cities of Renton, Algona, Auburn, Bellevue, Federal Way, Kent,  Kirkland, Milton, Newcastle, Pacific, Redmond, Seattle, and Tukwila, King County, Bellevue  College, Bellevue School District, Federal Way Public Schools, Lake Washington School District,  Northshore School District, Renton School District, University of Washington, Evergreen Hospital,  Valley Medical Center, NORCOM, South Sound 911, Valley Communications Center, and South  Correctional Entity (SCORE); and  WHEREAS, the purpose of the Consortium is to acquire, construct, operate, manage and  maintain a regional communications network that meets the needs of community institutions,  including but not limited to government agencies, hospitals, schools and universities; and  AGENDA ITEM #7. e) RESOLUTION NO. _______  2  WHEREAS, the Consortium has periodically executed project agreements for specific  regional projects, some of which do not require participation by all members of the Consortium;  and  WHEREAS, presently, certain members of the Consortium, namely the Cities of Renton,  Bellevue, Kirkland, Redmond, King County, Bellevue School District 405, Lake Washington School  District, and Renton School District (“Project Agreement Members”), intend to enter into  Consortium Project Agreement 73, which provides for participation in the Eastside Rail Corridor  (“ERC”) Fiber Optic Feasibility Study and defines each participating member’s contribution to the  study (“Project Agreement”); and  WHEREAS, the ERC passes through certain Consortium member cities, and a potential  development of fiber optic infrastructure in the ERC could benefit the Project Agreement  members.  As such, the participants in the Project Agreement intend to each contribute funds  toward the completion of the study; and  WHEREAS, the City of Kirkland, acting as the lead agency in the Project Agreement has  agreed to collect and aggregate payments from project participants towards the payment of  project funds.  The Project Agreement memorializes the financial commitments of the  participants, and when executed, will allow the City of Kirkland to execute the final professional  services agreement anticipated in the Project Agreement;   NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO  RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:  AGENDA ITEM #7. e) RESOLUTION NO. _______  3  SECTION I. The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to enter into an interlocal  agreement with the Project Agreement members entitled Consortium Project Agreement 73,  attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and incorporated by this reference.   PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this ______ day of _____________________, 2018.        ______________________________  Jason A. Seth, City Clerk         APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this ______ day of _____________________, 2018.        ______________________________  Denis Law, Mayor            Approved as to form:      ______________________________  Shane Moloney, City Attorney    RES:1778:7/18/18:scr     AGENDA ITEM #7. e) RESOLUTION NO. _______  4                  EXHIBIT “A”  CONSORTIUM PROJECT AGREEMENT 73  AGENDA ITEM #7. e) C3 Project Agreement 73 Page 1 of 21 Consortium Project Agreement 73 City of Kirkland 123 5th Ave Kirkland, WA 98033 City of Bellevue 450 110th Ave NE Bellevue, WA 98004 King County IT CNK-IT-600 401 Fifth Avenue, Suite 700 Seattle, WA 98104 Lake Washington School District P.O. Box 97039 Redmond, WA 98073 City of Redmond 15670 NE 85th St Redmond, WA 98052 City of Renton 1055 S Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 Renton School District 300 SW 7th St Renton, WA 98057 Bellevue School District 405 12111 NE 1st St Bellevue, WA 98005 Community Connectivity Consortium %Bellevue Information Technology 450 110th Ave NE Bellevue, WA 98004 Provides for named C3 members’ participation in the Eastside Rail Corridor (ERC) Fiber Optic Feasibility Study and defines each participating member’s contribution to the study. AGENDA ITEM #7. e) C3 Project Agreement 73 Page 2 of 21 Table of Contents Consortium Project Agreement 73 ........................................................................................... 1  King County IT CNK‐IT‐600 401 Fifth Avenue, Suite 700 Seattle, WA  98104 ...................................... 1  Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................. 2  I. Project Description ........................................................................................................... 4  A. Project Number ....................................................................................................................... 4  B. Project Name ........................................................................................................................... 4  C. Project Description .................................................................................................................. 4  D. Lead Agency/ Project Manager ................................................................................................ 5  E. Participating Agencies ............................................................................................................. 5  F. Agreement Term ..................................................................................................................... 5  II. Description of Project ....................................................................................................... 5  Scope of Work ................................................................................................................................. 5  A. Responsibilities of Lead Agency and Project Manager .............................................................. 6  B. Responsibilities of Project Participants .................................................................................... 6  C. Payment by Project Participants .............................................................................................. 7  III. Apportionment of and Limitation on Liability ............................................................... 7  I. Liability ....................................................................................................................................................... 7  II. Worker Insurance ...................................................................................................................................... 8  III. General Liability Insurance. ..................................................................................................................... 8  IV. Disclaimer, Third Party Components, and Exclusion of Damages .................................. 9  V. Project Schedule ............................................................................................................. 11  VI. Miscellaneous ............................................................................................................ 11  A. Modifications or Amendments .............................................................................................. 11  B. Counterparts ......................................................................................................................... 12  C. Authority ............................................................................................................................... 12  VII. Approvals ................................................................................................................... 13  City of Kirkland .............................................................................................................................. 13  City of Bellevue .............................................................................................................................. 13  Community Connectivity Consortium ............................................................................................. 13  Project Agreement 73 Approvals (continued): .................................................................................................. 14  Bellevue School District 405 ........................................................................................................... 14  King County ................................................................................................................................... 14  City of Redmond ............................................................................................................................ 14  AGENDA ITEM #7. e) C3 Project Agreement 73 Page 3 of 21 Project Agreement 73 Approvals (continued): .................................................................................................. 15  City of Renton ................................................................................................................................ 15  Renton School District ................................................................................................................... 15  Lake Washington School District .................................................................................................... 15  Addendum 1 – Statement of Work (CTC) ................................................................................ 16  Overview ............................................................................................................................................................ 17  Project Tasks ...................................................................................................................................................... 17  Project Communications .................................................................................................................................... 21  Deliverables ........................................................................................................................................................ 21    AGENDA ITEM #7. e) C3 Project Agreement 73 Page 4 of 21 I. Project Description A. Project Number 73 B. Project Name C3 participation in ERC Fiber Optic Feasibility Study C. Project Description Following an RFP and negotiations, the City of Kirkland contemplates engaging Columbia Telecommunications Corporation (CTC) to perform a feasibility study to access the viability of building a high-capacity fiber optic infrastructure that runs the length of the Eastside Rail Corridor (ERC). The City of Kirkland, acting as the Lead Agency in this Project Agreement has agreed to collect and aggregate payments from project participants towards the payment of project funds to CTC. This Project Agreement memorializes the financial commitments of the participants, and when executed, will allow the City of Kirkland to execute the final Professional Services Agreement with CTC. The ERC passes through several C3 member cities, and a potential development of fiber optic infrastructure in the ERC could benefit these C3 members. As such, the participants in this project agreement agree to contribute funds toward the completion of the feasibility study. Some segments of the C3 Fiber Optic System currently traverse fiber routes whose traffic is restricted by agreements to non-commercial, public, education and governmental agency use only. Utilization of potential alternate fiber optic routes identified in the ERC could allow C3 members to increase their scope of usage. The work to complete this study is fully defined in the Scope of Work (SOW) negotiated between the city of Kirkland and CTC. Participating Agencies benefit from this study in the following ways:   Receive a copy of final deliverables  Better informed on options to achieve a major north-south fiber infrastructure route that is unrestricted, a major C3 goal  Ability to shape business and infrastructure strategies that can enhance each participating agency’s mission and contribute to the broader region’s resiliency AGENDA ITEM #7. e) C3 Project Agreement 73 Page 5 of 21 D. Lead Agency/ Project Manager City of Kirkland/King County E. Participating Agencies City of Kirkland City of Bellevue Bellevue School District 405 City of Redmond City of Renton King County Lake Washington School District Renton School District F. Agreement Term This agreement will commence on the date of acceptance by all parties named in Section VII – Approvals and will terminate 60 days following delivery and acceptance of the final CTC Feasibility Study by the city of Kirkland. II. Description of Project Scope of Work The Scope of Work (SOW) for this project is fully set out in the agreement between the City of Kirkland and Columbia Telecommunications Corporation (CTC) which is incorporated in this document as Addendum 1. The SOW included in this document is a DRAFT SOW. Signatories to this Project Agreement agree that the Lead Agency and Project Manager have authority to approve the final SOW and make adjustments as needed throughout the life of that contract as long as the changes do not result in substantial material changes to this Project Agreement. CTC will deliver a feasibility study that focuses on the opportunities and long-term vision of the study participants’ utilization of the ERC as well as the expected development costs and timelines to utilize the ERC as a fiber optic infrastructure corridor. AGENDA ITEM #7. e) C3 Project Agreement 73 Page 6 of 21 The study will deliver the following items: 1. A conceptual technical plan 2. A fiber engineering and cost estimate 3. A high-level business model A. Responsibilities of Lead Agency and Project Manager 1. The Lead Agency is responsible to coordinate the payments towards the project from each participant. 2. The Lead Agency is the responsible party for all matters relating to the contract with CTC. 3. The Project Manager will assist the Lead Agency by working with CTC to coordinate the project schedule. CTC will be responsible for submitting changes to the project schedule to the Lead Agency. 4. The Lead Agency will approve changes to the project scope in its contract with CTC where the Lead Agency determines that these changes are beneficial to the outcome of the project. 5. The Lead Agency may make reasonable changes to the project’s scope and deliverables, as recommended by CTC, without amendment to this Project Agreement so long as these changes do not incur an increase to the project cost or financial commitment of a Project participant. . 6. The Project Manager will assist the Lead Agency by working with CTC to coordinate stakeholder meetings and presentations. 7. The Project Manager will assist the Lead Agency by coordinating all ERC document requests between CTC and Project Participants. 8. The Project Manager’s overall function is to assist the Lead Agency in its administration of the Lead Agency’s contract with CTS. However, it is understood that the Project Manager is not an employee of the Lead Agency and shall remain under the supervisory authority of King County Information Technology, Regional Services, I-Net Business Manager. B. Responsibilities of Project Participants Project participants will contribute towards the completion of the study in the following manners: 1. Participate in stakeholder interviews with CTC to contribute their insights, needs and concerns 2. Provide (where permitted and applicable) any relevant maps, studies, documents or data to CTC for review as part of their work. 3. As needed, participate in conference calls or meetings with CTC and other participants to provide feedback and insights to CTC as part of their study. 4. Participate in the study’s final review process AGENDA ITEM #7. e) C3 Project Agreement 73 Page 7 of 21 C. Payment by Project Participants The project participants agree to contribute the amounts shown in the table below toward to overall cost of the ERC Feasibility Study. C3 agrees to allocate up to $10,000 as contingency funds for this project to be applied in the event that change orders or contract costs exceed $99,000. Release and payment of C3 contingency funds must be agreed to in writing as an addendum to this agreement by the City of Kirkland, King County, and C3. Payment of contingency funds must also be reported to the C3 Board of Directors at the next regularly scheduled C3 Board Meeting. The participants agree to make their agreed payments within 30 days of invoice receipt from the City of Kirkland. All payment obligations associated with this Project Agreement 73 shall be complete prior to December 31st, 2018 Project Participant Contribution City of Kirkland * $18,000 Lake Washington School District $10,000 King County $25,000 City of Bellevue $10,000 Bellevue School District $10,000 City of Redmond $10,000 City of Renton $10,000 Renton Schools $6,000 C3 Consortium (Contingency Funds) UP TO $10,000 Total (Including Contingency Funds) $109,000 * The City of Kirkland’s contribution of $18,000 includes a $10,000 contribution towards the project from the Pacific NW GigaPop (PNWGP). The partnership between PNWGP and the City of Kirkland is solely between the PNWGP and the City of Kirkland and is noted here to clearly define the overall contribution of the City of Kirkland. III. Apportionment of and Limitation on Liability I. Liability 1. Except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, each party shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the other parties, including their officers, officials, employees, agents, and regents, from and against any claim alleging harm, damage, injury, or loss to any person or property to the extent such claim arises AGENDA ITEM #7. e) C3 Project Agreement 73 Page 8 of 21 out of or results from its own, or its employees' or agents' negligent acts or omissions, whether during construction or after completion of the project. 2. If a party uses contractors or subcontractors for work pursuant to this Agreement, then either (a) the party agrees that its obligations in Section I above will include responsibility for claims arising from the performance of such contractors and subcontractors, or (b) the party will include in its contract with any such contractor or subcontractor a provision requiring the contractor or subcontractor to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the other parties, including their officials, employees, and agents from and against any claim arising from the contractor's or subcontractor's performance. 3. The indemnity in Section I above is specifically and expressly intended to constitute a waiver of each party's immunity under the Washington Industrial Insurance Act, RCW Title 51, (a) only between and with regard to the parties, (b) only for work done by a party, and (c) only to the extent necessary to provide the indemnified party or parties with a full and complete indemnity of claims made by the indemnitor's employees. The parties acknowledge that these provisions were specifically negotiated and agreed upon by them. 4. Kirkland’s liability shall be limited to providing the service(s) described in this Project Agreement. Kirkland shall not be liable to any third party having a contractual relationship with CTC. II. Worker Insurance Each party to this Agreement shall ensure that it and all persons performing work on its behalf, including without limitation project suppliers and subcontractors, maintain in effect at all times during the Work, coverage or insurance in accordance with the applicable laws relating to worker's compensation and employer's liability insurance (including, but not limited to, the Washington Industrial Insurance Act and the laws of the state in which any such person was hired), regardless of whether such coverage or insurance is mandatory or merely elective under the law. Each party shall furnish such assurance and evidence of such coverage or insurance (such as copies of insurance policies and Certificates of Compliance issued by the Washington State Department of Labor and Industries) as Participating Agencies may request. III. General Liability Insurance. Each party to this Agreement shall maintain in full force and effect throughout the term of this Agreement, a minimum of Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000) liability AGENDA ITEM #7. e) C3 Project Agreement 73 Page 9 of 21 insurance for property damage and bodily injury, and shall cause its agents, contractors, and subcontractors to maintain the same with regard to work under this Agreement. In satisfying the insurance requirements set forth in this section, a party may self-insure against such risks in such amounts as are reasonable for a municipality or agency of its size or shall obtain a coverage agreement through a Risk Pool authorized by Chapter 48.62 RCW which shall provide liability coverage to the party for the liabilities contractually assumed by the party in this Agreement. At the time of execution of this Agreement, and prior to commencement of performance of any of the Work, each party shall furnish, upon request, a Certificates of Insurance as evidence that policies providing insurance (or self-insurance) with such provisions, coverages and limits are in full force and effect. Lead Agency will insure that CTC includes King County as an additional insured party on their Certificate of Insurance as evidence that policies providing insurance (or self-insurance) with such provisions, coverages and limits are in full force and effect. IV. Disclaimer, Third Party Components, and Exclusion of Damages A. DISCLAIMER. ALL SERVICES AND ACTIVITIES PROVIDED BY A PARTY UNDER THIS AGREEMENT, , AND NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER PROVISION OF THIS AGREEMENT, ARE PROVIDED "AS IS". THE PARTIES ACCEPT SUCH ACTIVITIES, SERVICES AND THE SERVICE EQUIPMENT "AS IS," WITH NO REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, OR NON- INFRINGEMENT OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTY ARISING FROM STATUTE, COURSE OF DEALING, COURSE OF PERFORMANCE, OR USAGE OF TRADE. WITHOUT LIMITING THE GENERALITY OF THE FOREGOING, NO PARTY HAS ANY OBLIGATION TO INDEMNIFY OR DEFEND ANY OTHER PARTY AGAINST CLAIMS RELATED TO INFRINGEMENT OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS B. EXCLUSION OF DAMAGES. TO THE EXTENT ALLOWED BY LAW, AND NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER PROVISION OF THIS AGREEMENT, IN NO EVENT WILL ANY PARTY BE LIABLE TO ANY OTHER PARTY OR TO ANY THIRD PARTY FOR ANY LOST PROFITS (WHETHER DIRECT OR INDIRECT) OR LOSS OF DATA, COVER, SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES, OR FOR INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE, SPECIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES (INCLUDING DAMAGE TO BUSINESS, REPUTATION, OR GOODWILL), OR INDIRECT DAMAGES OF ANY TYPE HOWEVER CAUSED, WHETHER BY BREACH OF CONTRACT, TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE), OR ANY OTHER AGENDA ITEM #7. e) C3 Project Agreement 73 Page 10 of 21 LEGAL OR EQUITABLE CAUSE OF ACTION, EVEN IF THE PARTY HAS BEEN ADVISED OF SUCH DAMAGES IN ADVANCE OR IF SUCH DAMAGES WERE FORESEEABLE. AGENDA ITEM #7. e) C3 Project Agreement 73 Page 11 of 21 V. Project Schedule The Project Schedule shown below represents a draft project schedule, assuming that the project begins on September 4, 2018. As noted in the SOW, many of the project tasks listed below will be performed in parallel. The Project Schedule included in this document is a DRAFT Project Schedule. Signatories to this Project Agreement agree that the Lead Agency and Project Manager have authority to approve the final Project Schedule and make adjustments as needed throughout the life of that contract as long as the changes do not result in substantial material changes to this Project Agreement. Task Begin End Project Kick-off Meeting 9/4/18 9/7/18 Conceptual Technical Plan 9/7/18 Stakeholder Outreach 9/7/18 Engagement with permitting authorities and other agencies and governments Fiber Engineering and Cost Estimate Survey and document fiber routes Cost estimates Develop scope and responsibilities for portions of the route Development of a High-Level Business Model Business case analysis Benchmark pricing Data collection with potential customers Study Delivery Study Draft Review Process Final Study Acceptance Project Completion 12/31/18 VI. Miscellaneous A. Modifications or Amendments No modification to or amendment of the provisions of this Agreement shall be effective unless in writing and signed by authorized representatives of the parties AGENDA ITEM #7. e) C3 Project Agreement 73 Page 12 of 21 to this Agreement. The parties expressly reserve the right to modify this Agreement, from time to time, by mutual agreement as called for in the Project Agreement Template Policy. B. Counterparts This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which so executed will be deemed to be an original and such counterpart together will constitute on and the same agreement. C. Authority Each party hereby represents and warrants to the other parties that it has the right, powers, and authority to enter into this Agreement and to fully perform all of its obligations hereunder. AGENDA ITEM #7. e) C3 Project Agreement 73 Page 13 of 21 VII. Approvals IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Project Agreement on the respective dates indicated below. City of Kirkland __________________________ ______________ Signature Date __________________________ Name (Printed) __________________________ Title (Printed) City of Bellevue __________________________ ______________ Signature Date __________________________ Name (Printed) __________________________ Title (Printed) Community Connectivity Consortium __________________________ ______________ Signature Date __________________________ Name (Printed) __________________________ Title (Printed) AGENDA ITEM #7. e) C3 Project Agreement 73 Page 14 of 21 Project Agreement 73 Approvals (continued): Bellevue School District 405 __________________________ ______________ Signature Date __________________________ Name (Printed) __________________________ Title (Printed) King County __________________________ ______________ Signature Date __________________________ Name (Printed) __________________________ Title (Printed) City of Redmond __________________________ ______________ Signature Date __________________________ Name (Printed) __________________________ Title (Printed) AGENDA ITEM #7. e) C3 Project Agreement 73 Page 15 of 21 Project Agreement 73 Approvals (continued): City of Renton __________________________ ______________ Signature Date __________________________ Name (Printed) __________________________ Title (Printed) Renton School District __________________________ ______________ Signature Date __________________________ Name (Printed) __________________________ Title (Printed) Lake Washington School District __________________________ ______________ Signature Date __________________________ Name (Printed) __________________________ Title (Printed) AGENDA ITEM #7. e) C3 Project Agreement 73 Page 16 of 21 Addendum 1 – Statement of Work (CTC)   July 6, 2018 Ms. Brenda Cooper Chief Information Officer Information Technology Department City of Kirkland 123 5th Ave. Kirkland, WA 98033 Subject: Revised expanded scope of work for Eastside Rail Corridor Feasibility Study Dear Brenda: As you requested, I’ve revised our scope of work to reflect your comments and those of your colleagues. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you would like to talk further. We look forward to working with you and your colleagues on this important initiative. Best regards, Joanne S. Hovis | President    AGENDA ITEM #7. e) C3 Project Agreement 73 Page 17 of 21 Overview  The project stakeholders (collectively referred to here as “the ERC Partners”) seek to assess the viability of building a high-capacity fiber optic infrastructure that runs the entire length of the Eastside Rail Corridor (ERC) to the northern border of King County, including the Redmond spur.1 This statement of work outlines the tasks that CTC Technology & Energy (CTC) proposes to undertake on the ERC Partners’ behalf to comprehensively examine the project requirements and opportunities, and to identify a fiber implementation plan and business model and sources of funding. CTC proposes to develop a technical and business analysis, conceptual designs and cost estimates, and a business model to help guide the project future steps.   The goal of this effort is to enable the ERC Partners to capitalize on the construction within the ERC right-of-way and to bring a valuable resource to the ERC owners. CTC will provide the strategic analysis, recommendations, and constraints the ERC Partners need to understand whether such an initiative is realistic and feasible in terms of both technical and financial requirements. The ERC Partners’ consideration of this project is forward thinking. The development of the ERC project presents a unique, time-sensitive opportunity to share costs on a significant fiber backbone in a region where a lack of adequate fiber access may have a negative impact on local businesses and economic development. The feasibility study will not include examination or assessment of property rights or property interests along the ERC. CTC’s will use our extensive knowledge of the experiences, best practices, and results of similar initiatives in other communities nationwide for this study. Project Tasks  Following a project kick-off meeting to introduce stakeholders (including representatives of any stakeholders that the ERC Partners’ project team chooses) and to establish the project’s goals and schedule, our engineer and business planner will review any relevant maps, studies, documents, or data that these stakeholders can share with us. Our review will focus on understanding the opportunities and long-term vision, as well as the expected development timeline and processes.   Based on this initial information gathering, we will proceed with the primary project tasks—a series of interrelated steps that will be conducted in parallel, but that we list separately here for ease of review. 1 See, for example: “Creating Connections: Recommendations on the Eastside Rail Corridor  from the Regional Advisory Council,” October 2013. See also: “Eastside Rail Corridor from the  Regional Advisory Council,” http://www.kingcounty.gov/operations/erc‐advisory‐council.aspx   AGENDA ITEM #7. e) C3 Project Agreement 73 Page 18 of 21 Task 1: Conceptual Technical Plan In this task, we will identify the required infrastructure and other technical considerations for providing services along the corridor and to adjacent areas. We will develop a high- level design and cost estimate for deploying a future-proof middle-mile fiber network that not only has sufficient capacity to meet the ERC Partners’ technical requirements for fiber-based broadband connectivity in this area, but also features excess fiber capacity that will enable future use and the corresponding long-term revenue that such future uses might provide. Stakeholder Outreach As a prerequisite to developing the fiber conceptual design and cost estimate, we will have on-site discussions with project stakeholders to establish a clear definition of the broadband connectivity requirements that the project will address, and to identify geographic and other considerations (e.g., underground construction) that will guide the network design. Drawing on our experience supporting numerous broadband network developments for many cities, counties, states, and non-profit entities, we will also seek to meet with representatives of other potential stakeholders and partners that might in the future want to partner on construction or become a fiber lessee. We will also engage with representatives of permitting authorities and other agencies government regarding the issues of planning fiber infrastructure deployment during other capital projects as a way to minimize costs. (We have in the past worked with ERC team members to develop long-term planning strategies for installing conduit for telecommunications.) We will address important factors such as:  Developing ongoing relations and agreement with telecommunications providers  Installing shared access points  Creating shared equipment hubs  Ensuring proper maintenance support This task will create the foundation for the following tasks and the recommendations we present in our final deliverable. Throughout this task we will be in regular contact with ERC Partners’ staff. Fiber Engineering and Cost Estimate We will develop a fiber plan (i.e., a map illustrating the potential placement of fiber throughout the corridor and adjacent target areas), a conceptual design, and a budgetary cost estimate for the fiber construction. We will identify candidate locations for last-mile service interconnection, recommend splice points, and determine whether there would need to be a peering point for service providers and municipal customers. AGENDA ITEM #7. e) C3 Project Agreement 73 Page 19 of 21 The primary focus of our conceptual design will be to develop a cost estimate for building fiber in the ERC to meet the needs of potential current and future users, with specific attention paid to optimizing economic development and supporting competitive services. We will develop a high-level design that is optimized to support the needs of the ERC Partners and other potential stakeholders, as well as to enable the ERC Partners access to fiber for future uses. The design will thus include excess fiber in the backbone to enable the ERC Partners to explore options for future expansion and service provisions. To survey candidate fiber routes and develop cost estimates, CTC engineers will perform both  filed surveys and a desk survey of candidate fiber routing using ERC Partners‐provided maps,  Google Earth, and other data sources.   We will include in our engineering analysis existing infrastructure (including rights‐of‐way  access and locations for network hubs and other necessary infrastructure) that we believe the ERC Partners can use to support the backbone deployment.   Among the issues we will address are the regulatory and permitting costs required to start construction, and a high-level assessment of how long construction might take.  We will provide estimates in the form of a cost range, with the lower-end estimates representing most likely costs, and the higher-end representing budgetary estimates with suitable contingencies included. Budgetary estimates will include any studies or permits that are likely to be necessary. Our planning will also seek to ensure that the ERC Partners understand the scope of what it will need to build so that the infrastructure is future-proof and does not require retrofitting to move to new technologies. This will include addressing questions such as how the responsibility for specific portions of the construction might be divided among the ERC Partners, other public and non-profit stakeholders, and others that may share an interest in the initiative. To be clear, we will not be providing a blueprint-level network design. Rather, we will be providing a conceptual design and system-level overview of the potential infrastructure—which in turn will become a roadmap for future decisions, including detailed engineering and contracting for the fiber build-out along the ERC. Task 2: High-Level Business Model In collaboration with the ERC Partners, we will conduct meetings with potential private partners. For those potential partners that are local, the meetings would ideally be face to face; we would generally reserve telephone discussions for companies in other parts of the country that we have worked with on behalf of other municipal or county clients. The goal of this effort will be to determine whether there is a potential strategy to offset AGENDA ITEM #7. e) C3 Project Agreement 73 Page 20 of 21 the ERC Partners’ risk by sharing costs or enabling private sector deployment—or by some other mechanism that achieves the public sector goals of this initiative (i.e., meeting public sector communications needs, enabling use of excess fiber for last-mile deployment, and increasing the attractiveness and viability of the ERC) while mitigating public sector risk. We will then develop a business case analysis and high-level business model that provides recommendations and guidance on the likely roles of the ERC Partners and other stakeholders’ in project funding, ownership, and operation of the network infrastructure defined in the previous tasks.2 Our business planning will also include benchmarking pricing based on dark fiber pricing we see in comparable markets elsewhere. We will develop a financial model to determine the viability of the effort as a breakeven enterprise. In other words, we will seek to determine whether the revenues from dark fiber leases would potentially cover the ERC Partners’ costs, and whether it would be possible to make this effort work financially by offsetting costs through public – private partnerships of various sorts. The proposed business model will reflect our understanding of the ERC Partners’ position— driven by a mission to enhance community economic growth and job creation, but interested in identifying private sector motivation to develop this infrastructure. To the extent that we identify a public sector role, we will focus on also identifying a cost recovery model (whether short- or long-term) over time. We will also attempt to collect data through interviews with potential fiber customers, property developers, and the commercial real estate community along the corridor; we will gauge their interest in gaining access to new competitive service providers on a wholesale or retail basis and to gain insight into related issues of importance to these sectors. (We would request the ERC Partners’ help in making those connections, and would undertake one or two group meetings with these stakeholders if possible.) Throughout this task, we will be focused on developing the cost and revenue inputs for our high-level financial analysis. Customer insights gathered in this stage can also be further leveraged at a later time for marketing purposes. Drawing together all of the research, analysis, and recommendations developed in the previous steps, we will then prepare a high-level financial model that describes, based on a range of clearly identified assumptions, the potential revenue (if any) that the ERC Partners or a partner might see over the course of its fiber construction and operations. We will pay particular attention to evaluating the ERC Partners’ risk over time, and to 2 CTC is not qualified to provide legal advice. We recommend that the ERC Partners and other  project stakeholders seek qualified legal counsel on any issues related to local or state laws or  regulations as they relate to network planning.  AGENDA ITEM #7. e) C3 Project Agreement 73 Page 21 of 21 answering the overarching question of whether there is a reasonable potential for cost recovery. To complement the financial and business model analysis, we will also develop a high- level strategic analysis of how this infrastructure, if it were deployed, would address many of the digital and broadband equity concerns of the public sector partners. To this end, we will review their digital inclusion and equity plans; conduct up to six calls with the stakeholders; and seek to build into the pricing plan and business recommendations strategies that would hopefully help to move the needle on digital equity matters. Project Communications As we discussed extensively on the phone, we commit to scheduling biweekly check-in calls with your project team to provide timely feedback and insight into what we find during our engineering process. We will also establish a file-sharing mechanism (e.g., SharePoint, Dropbox, FTP) for the ongoing, two-way transfer of data and maps. One of the goals of these ongoing communications will be to enable your project team to track emerging risks and challenges as we identify them—and to ensure that the final report does not include any surprises in terms of potential construction risk. While it is impossible to predict whether we will uncover any significant issues (such as significant environmental concerns) that might make the project financially infeasible, flagging any such issues early on will create the opportunity for an off-ramp for the project. That is, you will not have to proceed with subsequent stages of planning if we identify an issue that you determine might be a showstopper. Deliverables Our final deliverable will be a technical and business strategy with a conceptual network design, construction cost estimates, and fiber plan (map). We will identify strategic points of presence and describe potential business models (including a list of plausible partners). Our written report will include a clear and concise narrative supported by charts, tables, graphics, and maps, as appropriate. We will attribute and provide sourcing for our research. We will provide the ERC Partners’ identified reviewers with an electronic draft of our report for initial review. We will incorporate feedback and edits from reviewers within one week of receipt, and will deliver an electronic version of the final report. We will also present our strategic plan and recommendations via teleconference and in person at up to five meetings, to be scheduled following acceptance of the report. AGENDA ITEM #7. e) AB - 2189 City Council Regular Meeting - 06 Aug 2018 SUBJECT/TITLE: Local Government Investment Pool (LGIP) - Signing Authority RECOMMENDED ACTION: Council Concur DEPARTMENT: Administrative Services Department STAFF CONTACT: Jamie Thomas, Fiscal Services Director EXT.: 6929 FISCAL IMPACT SUMMARY: n/a SUMMARY OF ACTION: The City invests a portion of its cash assets in the Local Government Investment Pool (LGIP), which is administered by the Office of the State Treasurer. In Resolution 4217, passed by Council on June 23, 2014, Iwen Wang, former City Administrative Services Administrator was authorized, by name, to make all amendments, changes, and alterations to the "Local Government Investment Pool Transaction Authorization Form". Iwen retired from the City in July 2016. Staff is proposing an amendment to Resolution 421 7 which continues to grant authorization to the Administrative Services Administrator, by title, and removes Iwen Wang's delegation as the LGIP authorized individual due to her retirement and termination of employment with the City of Renton. EXHIBITS: A. Resolution STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve the amendment to resolution 4217, revoking Iwen Wang's name as the LGIP authorized individual and grant the Administrative Services Administrator, by title, as the LGIP authorized individual. AGENDA ITEM #7. f)   1  CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON    RESOLUTION NO. _______    A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, REVOKING THE CITY  COUNCIL’S DELEGATION OF IWEN WANG AS THE AUTHORIZED INDIVIDUAL  DELEGATED TO ADMINISTER THE INVESTMENT OF CITY OF RENTON MONIES IN  THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT INVESTMENT POOL, AND DESIGNATING THE  ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES ADMINISTRATOR, BY TITLE, AS THE AUTHORIZED  INDIVIDUAL.    WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 294, Laws of 1986, the Legislature created a trust fund to  be known as the public funds investment account (commonly referred to as the  Local  Government Investment Pool (“LGIP”)) for the contribution and withdrawal  of money by an   authorized governmental entity for purposes of investment by the Office of the State Treasurer;  and  WHEREAS, the City Council, by Resolution No. 4217, passed on June 23, 2014, authorized  the contribution and withdrawal of City monies in the LGIP in the manner prescribed by law, rule,  and prospectus; and  WHEREAS, the City Council, by Resolution No. 4217, designated Iwen Wang, the former  Administrative Services Administrator, as the “authorized individual” to contribute or withdraw  City of Renton funds in the LGIP, and to authorize all amendments, changes, or alterations to the  Local Government Investment Pool Transaction Authorization Form (“Form”) or any other  documentation including the designation of other individuals to make contributions and  withdrawals on behalf of the City; and  WHEREAS, as required by Section IV of Resolution No. 4217, the City Council is required  provide written notice that the authorized individual has been terminated or that his or her  delegation has been revoked;  AGENDA ITEM #7. f)   RESOLUTION NO. ________  2  NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO  RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:  SECTION I.  The City Council hereby revokes its delegation of Iwen Wang as the LGIP  authorized individual due to her retirement and termination of employment with the City of  Renton.  SECTION II.  The City hereby designates the Administrative Services Administrator, by  title, as the “authorized individual” to contribute or withdraw City of Renton funds in the LGIP,  and to authorize all amendments, changes, or alterations to the Form or any other  documentation including the designation of other individuals to make contributions and  withdrawals on behalf of the City.   SECTION II. The City will cause to be filed a certified copy of this resolution with the  Office of the State Treasurer as written notice of the revocation and new designation.  PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this ______ day of _______________________, 2018.        ______________________________  Jason A. Seth, City Clerk       APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this ______ day of _______________________, 2018.        ______________________________  Denis Law, Mayor            AGENDA ITEM #7. f)   RESOLUTION NO. ________  3  Approved as to form:      ______________________________  Shane Moloney, City Attorney    RES:1779:7/25/18:scr  AGENDA ITEM #7. f) AB - 2180 City Council Regular Meeting - 06 Aug 2018 SUBJECT/TITLE: Repeal and Replace Chapter 6-3 of the Renton Municipal Code, Amending Alarm System Regulations RECOMMENDED ACTION: Refer to Public Safety Committee DEPARTMENT: Police STAFF CONTACT: Dave Leibman, Commander EXT.: 7573 FISCAL IMPACT SUMMARY: N/A SUMMARY OF ACTION: To replace the City of Renton alarm ordinance with language and processes that support modern false alarm reduction programs. The current City of Renton alarm ordinance supported a police department burglar alarm reduction program that ceased to exist once the program software became obsolete and inoperable in 2016. Responding to and processing alarms cost the city an average of $350,000 in unproductive staff ti me per year, over the last three years. The new ordinance supports changes in practice that will enable the City to reduce the number of false alarms and associated costs by establishing reasonable expectations of alarm users and alarm companies, and to ensure that alarm users are held responsible for their use of alarm systems. EXHIBITS: A. Ordinance STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve the recommended repeal and replacement of Renton Municipal Code 6 -3 AGENDA ITEM #7. g) 1  CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON    ORDINANCE NO. ________    AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, REPEALING AND  REPLACING CHAPTER 6‐3 OF THE RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE, AMENDING ALARM  SYSTEM REGULATIONS, AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND ESTABLISHING  AN EFFECTIVE DATE.     WHEREAS, excessive false alarms unduly burden the City of Renton Police Department’s  limited law enforcement resources; and  WHEREAS, the purpose of this ordinance is to establish reasonable expectations of alarm  users, and alarm companies, and to ensure that alarm users are held responsible for their use of  alarm systems; and  WHEREAS, the Council deems it necessary to replace the current RMC Chapter 6‐3  (Burglar Alarms) relating to false alarm regulations; and  WHEREAS, the Council has determined that it would be beneficial to delegate the  enforcement responsibilities for excessive false alarms;  NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO  ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:  SECTION I. Chapter 6‐3 of the Renton Municipal Code is repealed in its entirety and  replaced with the following language:  CHAPTER 3  ALARM SYSTEM REGULATIONS  SECTION:  6‐3‐1:    Purpose  6‐3‐2:    Definitions  6‐3‐3:    Authority; Funds  6‐3‐4:    Alarm Permit Required  6‐3‐5:    Duties Of An Alarm User  6‐3‐6:    Duties Of An Alarm Company  AGENDA ITEM #7. g) ORDINANCE NO. ________  2  6‐3‐7:    Violations  6‐3‐8:    Suspension Of Response  6‐3‐9:    Reinstatement Of Response  6‐3‐10:  Appeals Process    6‐3‐1 PURPOSE:  It is the intent of this chapter to reduce the number of false alarms occurring  within the City and to minimize the resulting waste of City resources by providing  for corrective administrative action to hold alarm users and alarm companies  responsible for proper use of alarm systems.  6‐3‐2 DEFINITIONS:  The following words, terms and phrases, when used in this chapter, shall have the  meanings ascribed to them, except where the context clearly indicates a different  meaning:   A. Alarm Administrator: Person or persons designated by the City to  administer the provisions of this chapter.  B. Alarm Company: Person or company, firm, and/or a company engaged in  the selling, leasing, installing, servicing or monitoring alarm systems.  C. Alarm Dispatch Request: A notification to a law enforcement agency that  an alarm, either manual or automatic, has been activated at a particular alarm  site, which results in a request for law enforcement action.  D. Alarm Permit: A permit issued to an alarm user allowing the operation of  an alarm system within the City.   E. Alarm Signal: A detectable signal, audible or visual, generated by an alarm  system, which is intended to elicit a response from the City.   AGENDA ITEM #7. g) ORDINANCE NO. ________  3  F. Alarm System: Any single device or assembly of equipment designed to  signal the occurrence of an illegal or unauthorized entry, or other illegal activity  requiring immediate attention, and to which law enforcement is requested to  respond by an alarm company, but does not include motor vehicle or boat alarms,  fire alarms, or alarms designated to elicit a medical response.   G. Alarm User: Any person, corporation, partnership, proprietorship,  government, or educational entity or any other entity owning, leasing, or  operating an alarm system, or on whose premises an alarm system is maintained  for the protection of such premises.   H. Alarm User Awareness Class: A class conducted for the purpose of  educating alarm users about the responsible use, operation, and maintenance of  alarm systems and the problems created by false alarms.  I. Automatic Dial Protection Device: An automatic dialing device or an  automatic telephone dialing alarm system that includes any system which, upon  being activated, automatically initiates to the Renton Police Department a  recorded message or code signal indicating a need for law enforcement response.   J. Cancellation: The process by which an alarm dispatch request response is  terminated when the alarm company (designated by the alarm user) notifies the  Renton Police Department that there is not an existing situation at the alarm site  requiring police response.  If cancellation occurs prior to police arriving at the  scene, no fine will be assessed.  K. City: The City of Renton, Washington, or its designee.   AGENDA ITEM #7. g) ORDINANCE NO. ________  4  L. False Alarm:  1. A false alarm  includes the following:  a. The activation of an alarm system through mechanical or electronic  failure; malfunction; improper installation; negligence of alarm user, his/her  employees or agents that either directly or through a third party/object summons  law enforcement personnel; and  b. Upon inspection by the Renton Police Department, evidence  indicates that no unauthorized entry, burglary, or other such crime was  committed or attempted in or on the premises which would have activated a  properly functioning alarm system.  2. A false alarm shall not include:  a. An alarm which can reasonably be determined to have been caused  by conditions of nature;   b. Other extraordinary circumstances not reasonably subject to  control by the alarm user;   c. An alarm in which an alarm dispatch request response from the City  is cancelled by the user’s alarm company before the City arrives at the alarm  location; or  d. Intentional activation of the alarm system because of the  reasonable, but mistaken, belief that a crime is being or about to be committed.   M. Permit Year: A twelve (12)‐month period beginning on January 1st of each  year which the alarm permit is issued.    AGENDA ITEM #7. g) ORDINANCE NO. ________  5  N. Runaway Alarm: An alarm system that produces repeated alarm signals  that do not appear to be caused by separate human action or that produces three  (3) separate false alarm signals within a twenty‐four (24) hour period.   O. Verify: An attempt by the monitoring company, through telephone  verification, or its representative, to determine whether an alarm signal is valid  before requesting law enforcement dispatch, in an attempt to avoid an  unnecessary alarm dispatch request. Telephone verification means, at a  minimum, that a second call be made to a different number if the first attempt  fails to reach an alarm user who can properly identity themselves to determine  whether an alarm signal is valid before requesting law enforcement dispatch.   P.  Violator: Any alarm user that violates any provisions under this chapter  including but not limited to any alarm user upon whose property a false alarm  occurs.   6‐3‐3 AUTHORITY; FUNDS:  A. Responsibility for administration of this chapter is vested with the Chief of  Police.  B. The Chief of Police shall designate an alarm administrator to carry out the  administrative duties and functions described in this chapter.  C. The Chief of Police has the authority to review and recommend to the City  Council false alarm fees set forth in the City of Renton Fee Schedule.   D. The Chief of Police has the authority to delegate the City’s rights and  responsibilities delineated by this chapter to a third party.  AGENDA ITEM #7. g) ORDINANCE NO. ________  6  6‐3‐4 ALARM PERMIT REQUIRED:  No person shall own, lease or operate an alarm system without first obtaining a  permit for such alarm system from the City.  A separate alarm permit is required  for each alarm site.  A fee is required for the initial alarm registration.  No fee will  be charged for annual renewals. Each alarm permit shall be assigned a unique  permit number, and the alarm user or alarm company may be required to provide  the permit number to facilitate law enforcement dispatch and enforcement of this  chapter. Each alarm permit shall expire on December 31 of the year issued and  must be renewed annually by submitting an updated application to the City.  A  late fee will be assessed if the renewal is more than thirty (30) days late. An alarm  permit cannot be transferred to another person or alarm site.    A. Application: Each alarm user has a duty to obtain an application from the  City and apply for each permit on a form provided by the City.  B. Transfer of Possession: When the occupancy or possession of the  premises at which an alarm system is maintained is transferred, the alarm user  obtaining possession of the property shall file an application for an alarm permit  within thirty (30) days of obtaining possession of the property. Alarm permits are  not transferable.  C. Reporting Updated Information: Whenever any information provided on  the alarm permit application changes, the alarm user shall provide correct  information to the City within thirty (30) days of the change.  AGENDA ITEM #7. g) ORDINANCE NO. ________  7  D. Multiple Alarm Systems: If an alarm user has one (1) or more alarm  systems protecting two (2) or more separate structures having different addresses  and/or tenants, a separate permit shall be required for each structure and/or  tenant.  E. Failure to Register, Renew, or Update Information: Failure to initially  obtain or renew a permit under this chapter or report any updated information  within thirty (30) days of change shall result in a fine as set forth in the City of  Renton Fee Schedule.  F. Unpermitted Alarm Signal: If an alarm signal is originated from the  property of an alarm user who does not possess a current permit and such signal  results in an alarm dispatch request, the alarm user shall pay a fine for failure to  register as described in RMC 6‐3‐4.E, in addition to any other applicable fines and  fees.  6‐3‐5 DUTIES OF AN ALARM USER:  A. Comply with all applicable provisions of this chapter;  B. Maintain the premises and the alarm system in a manner that will reduce  or eliminate false alarms;  C. Provide the permit number to the alarm company to facilitate dispatch;  D. Refrain from manually activating an alarm for any reason other than the  occurrence of an event that the alarm system was intended to report. An alarm  user must not manually initiate a False Alarm;  E. Obtain an alarm permit for each alarm system;  AGENDA ITEM #7. g) ORDINANCE NO. ________  8  F.  Renew permit(s) annually;  G. Update the City with any changes to information contained on an alarm  permit application within thirty (30) days of the change.  H. Failure of alarm user to comply with the duties of this chapter may result  in a fine as set forth in the City of Renton Fee Schedule.  6‐3‐6 DUTIES OF AN ALARM COMPANY:  A. Any person engaged in the alarm business in the City shall comply with the  following:  1. Obtain and maintain the required state, county and/or city license(s).  2. Provide the City most current name, address, and telephone number  and other available information of the alarm user or a designee, who can be called  in an emergency, twenty‐four (24) hours a day, and contact a key holder or other  emergency contact who will be requested to respond immediately if necessary.  B. Ninety (90) days after enactment of this chapter, each alarm company  shall, on all new and upgraded installations, use only alarm control panels which  meet current industry standards.  C. Prior to activation of the alarm system, the alarm company must provide  to each alarm user:  1. Instructions explaining the proper operation of the alarm system; and  2. Written information of how to obtain service from the alarm company  for the alarm system.  D. Any alarm company doing business within the City of Renton shall:  AGENDA ITEM #7. g) ORDINANCE NO. ________  9  1. Attempt to verify, by calling the alarm site and/or alarm user by  telephone, to determine whether an alarm signal is valid before requesting  dispatch. Telephone verification shall require, at a minimum, that a second call be  made to a different number, if the first attempt fails to reach an alarm user who  can properly identify themselves to attempt to determine whether an alarm signal  is valid, except in the case of a panic, silent, duress or burglary and/or robbery‐in‐ progress alarm, or in cases where a crime‐in‐progress has been verified by video  and/or audible means.  2. Provide each address and alarm permit number to the communications  center to facilitate dispatch and/or cancellations.  3. Communicate any available information about the location of the  alarm.  4. Communicate a cancellation to the law enforcement communications  center as soon as possible following a determination that a response is  unnecessary.  E. Failure of an alarm company to comply with the duties under this chapter  may result in a fine as set forth in the City of Renton Fee Schedule.  6‐3‐7 VIOLATIONS:  A. It shall be a violation of this chapter:  1. For a false alarm to occur on an alarm user’s property;  2. To install, maintain, or use an audible alarm system which sounds  continually for more than fifteen (15) minutes;  AGENDA ITEM #7. g) ORDINANCE NO. ________  10  3. To install, maintain, or use an automatic dial protection device that  reports, or causes to be reported, any recorded message to the Renton Police  Department;  4. To fail to obtain a permit for an alarm system;   5. To fail to provide updated information to the City as described in this  chapter; or  6. To fail to comply with any other requirement of this chapter.  B. The alarm user will be responsible for violations under this chapter  whether or not the alarm user individually caused the violation to occur.  C. It shall be a violation of this chapter for an alarm company to violate any  requirements of this chapter.   D. Any violation of this chapter shall result in a fine, as determined by the City  of Renton Fee Schedule.  6‐3‐8 SUSPENSION OF RESPONSE:  A. The City may discontinue response of City emergency services if the City  determines that:  1. There is a false statement or omission of material fact made to the City  or contained in a permit application.  2. An alarm system meets the definition of a runaway alarm.  3. An alarm system has generated in excess of eight (8) false alarms  during any calendar year.  AGENDA ITEM #7. g) ORDINANCE NO. ________  11  4. The alarm user has failed to make payment of any fine or fee assessed  under this chapter within ninety (90) days of the assessment.  5. An alarm user commits any other violation of this chapter.  6‐3‐9 REINSTATEMENT OF RESPONSE:  A. The City may resume City emergency services response upon the alarm  user submitting satisfactory proof of compliance of one (1) or more of the  following:  1. Proof that the alarm system has been inspected and the measures  taken to ensure the alarm system is in good working order. Measures taken may  require the alarm user to repair, upgrade or modify the alarm system to be  compliant with this chapter.  2. Proof the alarm user has been retrained on the use of the alarm system  and procedures for contacting the alarm company in the case of false activation.  3. The alarm user successfully completes an online alarm user awareness  class and test.  4. All fees and fines are paid in full including a reinstatement fee as set  forth in the City of Renton Fee Schedule.  6‐3‐10 APPEALS PROCESS:  A. If the City assesses a fine, suspends, denies the issuance, renewal or  reinstatement of the alarm permit, the City or its designee shall send written  notice of the action and a statement of the right to an appeal to the aggrieved  party.   AGENDA ITEM #7. g) ORDINANCE NO. ________  12  B. Any party fined in accordance with this chapter may appeal an assessment  of a fine, a suspension of an alarm permit, or other enforcement action to the City  by mailing the appeal to the address as shown on the notice within fifteen (15)  days after receipt of the notice. The appeal must set forth in writing the reasons  for the appeal and any evidence that should be considered. The failure to give  notice of appeal within fifteen (15) days shall constitute a waiver of the right to  contest the violation(s) or enforcement action(s).  C. If a hearing is requested, written notice of the time, place, and manner of  the hearing shall be mailed to the address of the alarm user as contained in the  alarm permit, at least fifteen (15) days prior to the date of the hearing, which shall  be held no more than thirty (30) days after the request for hearing is filed.  D. The appeal shall be administered by the Chief of Police or his/her designee  (Hearing Officer). The alarm user and a representative of the Police Department  shall have the right to present written and/or oral evidence. If the Hearing Officer  determines, after the presentation of evidence, that any violations have occurred,  the Hearing Officer shall issue written findings and record the findings in the alarm  user’s record within thirty (30) days, and the fines shall be paid, including an  additional appeal fee. If the Hearing Officer determines that no violation has been  committed, the appeal fee and associated fine, if already paid, shall be refunded  within thirty (30) days, and no finding of violation may be entered on the alarm  user’s record.  AGENDA ITEM #7. g) ORDINANCE NO. ________  13  E. The appeal decision made by the Hearing Officer may be appealed to the  King County Superior Court within thirty (30) calendar days from the date the  decision is issued.   SECTION II. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or work of this  ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court or competent jurisdiction,  such invalidity or unconstitutionality thereof shall not affect the constitutionality of any other  section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or word of this ordinance.  SECTION III. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after  publication of a summary of this ordinance in the City’s official newspaper.  The summary shall  consist of this ordinance’s title.      PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this _______ day of ___________________, 2018.                         Jason A. Seth, City Clerk    APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this _______ day of _____________________, 2018.                         Denis Law, Mayor    Approved as to form:             Shane Moloney, City Attorney  Date of Publication:      ORD:2006:6/20/18:scr  AGENDA ITEM #7. g) AB - 2185 City Council Regular Meeting - 06 Aug 2018 SUBJECT/TITLE: Project Acceptance: Main Avenue South (South 3rd Street to Mill Avenue South), CAG-16-117 RECOMMENDED ACTION: Council Concur DEPARTMENT: Transportation Systems Division STAFF CONTACT: Keith Woolley, Transportation Design Project Mananger EXT.: 7318 FISCAL IMPACT SUMMARY: The initial contract with the contractor Jansen Inc. was for $1,957,257.53. Change orders increased the final amount 25.2% to $2,450,416.24. The total project budget is $3,430,846 and the final contract amount falls within the budget. The project budget for the construction phase was comprised of a $1,178,463 Transportation Improvement Board grant and $1,807,184 of City funds. SUMMARY OF ACTION: This project consisted of: 1. Constructing a new raised intersection. 2. Traffic signal. 3. Storm drainage. 4. Paving. 5. Curb and gutter. 6. Sidewalk. 7. Street lighting. 8. Channelization. 9. Landscaping. The project reconfigured Main Avenue South and Bronson Way South from a one-way to a two-way operation. Improvements were also made to the City’s water and sewer utilities. The project started February 7, 2017 and was completed February 26, 2018. A total of 18 change orders were issued during the project. Change Order No. 2 compensated the contractor $81,000 for additional working days when the construction phasing was revised from the contract. Irrigation and pedestrian illumination on Main Avenue South were added via two change orders totaling $105,000. Change Orders No. 13 and No. 14 compensated the contractor $272,809 for additional work and equitable adjustment due to unidentified underground utility conflicts. The City Council previously approved the identified change orders. Despite the City's issuance of change orders accounting for what it believes to be full and fair compensation for all work performed on the project, the contractor, Jansen Inc., protested the City's determination of compensation owed. After the City denied its protests and related claim, the contract or filed a complaint in King County Superior Court against the City on May 4, 2018, in which it seeks additional compensation for its work on the project. The City is actively defending that lawsuit while attempting to negotiate a mutual resolution. Due to the dispute surrounding the demand for additional compensation, the contractor declines to sign project documents, including change orders, progress payments and the final contract voucher certificate. Notwithstanding the ongoing dispute regarding compensation and the contractor's refusal to agree to final paperwork, the project is completed to the City's satisfaction and acceptance by Council is requested. Under state law, the City AGENDA ITEM #7. h) must close out the project and pay final authorized outstanding invoices and withheld funds. The Council's action to accept completion of the project does not affect the ongoing litigation. EXHIBITS: A. Notice of Completion of Public Works Contract with Release of Retainage Bond of Contractor B. Final Contract Voucher Certificate and Cover Letter C. May 15, 2018 Letter to Jansen, Inc. D. Final Progress Payment No. 12 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to unilaterally accept completion of the Main Avenue South (South 3rd Street to Mill Avenue South) Project, CAG-16-117 with Jansen, Inc., subject to receiving required certifications. AGENDA ITEM #7. h) MOriginal Revised # NOTICE OF COMPLETION OF PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT Date:Contractor's UBI Number:600 039 614 Name &Mailing Address of Public Agency Department Use Only "CityoFRTanton Assigned to: 1055 S Gradv Wav Renton.WA 98057 Date Assigned: UBI Number:177 000 094 Notice is hereby given relative to the completion of contract or project tlexeribetl below project Name Contract Number Job Order Contracting Main Ave S (S 3rd Street to MillAvenue S)CAG—16-117 Yes l7lNo Description of Work Done/Include Jobsite Address(es) Project Location:Main Ave S /S 2nd St intersection,Main Ave S (S 3rd St to MillAve S). Improvements include new traf?c signal system,illumination,pavement removal,new curb/gutter/sidewalk/concrete/pavement,water/storm/sewer utilities,signing &striping. Federally funded transportation project?Yes M No (if yes,provide Contract Bond Statement below) Contractor's Name E-mail Address Af?davit lD* Jansen Inc jansen@jansen—inc.com 780069 Contractor Address Telephone # 1215 W.Holly Street,Bellingham,WA 98225 (360)933-4807 if Retainage is not witlilielrl,please select one oftlte following and List Surety‘s Name &Bond Number. Retainage Bond Contract/Payment bOI‘lCl(yalid for federally lilnded transportation projects) Name:Berkeley Insurance Company Bond Number:0213071 Date Contract Awarded Date Work Commenced Date Work Completed Date Work Accepted January 9 2017 February 7,2017 Auguste,2018 my a February 26,2018 Contract Amount 1,94o,532_o4 Additions (+)$535,761.90 Liquidated Damages $000 Reductions (-)$57 603,12 Amount Disbursed $2,450.416,24 Sub-Total $2 418 83532 Amount Retained $0.00 Sales Tax Rate 95 ,10-0 % (lt‘various rates apply,please send :1 breakdown) Sales Tax Amount 3 31580_42 TOTAL 5 2 450 “E 24 TOTAL 3;2,450,416.24 NOTE:These two totals must be equal Comments: .\'ote:The Disbursing Ollicer must submit this completed notice llIlll1C(.lialCl)'nller acceptance of the work done under this contract. NO PAYMENT SHALL BE MADE l-‘ROW RETAINED FUNDS until receipt otiall release eertilicotes. Submitting Form:Please suhrnit the completed form by email to all three agencies below, Contact Name:Natalie vwssbmu Title:Accounting Asst IV Email Address:nwissbrod@rentonwa.gov Phone Number:425-430-6919 Department of Revenue wsminqcm Slate Depamnent at ‘E'“l’'°V’'‘°"‘5”°“'“V Publicworks Section Labor 3,industries f :°Pt""'““."‘I _ ($601704-5650 Contract Release u-"°“""“‘°§'"“""?"tPWC@dDr.wa.9ov (355)545-8153,oplion#4 $9’3‘“.;‘‘“'”‘°°°"""““°“ ConlractRe|ease@LN|WA GOV (3:0)5023450 pub|tcwurks@esd.wa.gov REV 31 00l0e(l0/Z6/15)FZIS-038-000 10-201'-l AGENDA ITEM #7. h) AGENDA ITEM #7. h) RELEASE OF RETAINAGE BOND OF CONTRACTOR Bond No.021307 I KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:That we lzmscn,Inc. (hereinafter called Principal),and Berkley Insurance Company a corporation organized and doing businessunder and by virtue of the laws of tl1estate of Delaware and duly licensed for the purpose of making,guaranteeing or becoming sole surety upon bonds or undertakings required and authorized by the State of Washington,(hereina?er called Surety), as Surety,are held ?rmly bound unto City of Renton ,(hereina?er called Obligee)in the just and full sum ofOne Hundred Twew-oneThousand Six Hundred And No/IOOTHS §|2l .600-00 1plus 5%of any increasesin the contract amount that have occurred or may occur,due to change orders,increases in the quantities or the addition of any new item of work THE CONDITIONSOF THIS OBLIGATION ARE SUCH TI-IAT,Whereas,the said Principal on the day of ,entered into a written contract with the said obliges for Main Avenue S (S 3rd Street to Mill Avenue S) which said contract is hereby referred to and made a part hereof by reference. WHEREAS,Pursuant to Chapter 60.28 RCW,the above named Principal has requested release of retained percentage earned or which may be earned under said contract,and, WHEREAS,the obligee is willing to release retained percentage in advance of contract terms relating to payment providedthe principal shall ?le bond to indemnify the obligee for all loss, cost or damages whichthe obligee may sustain by reason of payment of retainage to the principal,which bond shall be subject to all claims and liens in the same manner and same priority as apply to the retainage percentage released,or to be released, NOW,THI-IREFORE,the condition of this obligation is such that if the principal shall indemnify the obligee for all less,gog?darnagcs vyl1ic_h_the_Qbligeemay sustainby reasonof payment of ,retained percentage to the principal then this obligation shall be null and void unless otherwiseto remain in full force and effect. lN WITNESS WHEREOF,said principal and said Surety have caused these presents to be duly signed and sealed '5 12th day of March ,2()I8 Jansen,Inc. 3,;/ Principal Berkley Insurance Company By:Vi/IW7/74MarySANQWEH Attorney—in-Fact AGENDA ITEM #7. h) AGENDA ITEM #7. h) Final Contractvoucher Certificate Contractor Jansen,Inc. Street Address l2l5 W Holly St City 2 7 2 state K ' Zip 2 bate Bellingham WA 98225 4 May 4,2018 State Project Number Federal-Aid Project Number Highway Number TIB 8—l—102(036)—l n/a n/a Contract Title Main Avenue S —S 3'”Street to Mill Avenue S (SR 900);CAG—l6-117 Date Work PhysicallycompletedW 7 W Final Amount 7 7 February 26,2018 $2,450,416.24 Contractor's Certification I,the undersigned,having ?rst been duly sworn,certify that I am authorized to sign for the claimant;that in connection with the work performed and to the best of my knowledge no loan,gratuity or gift in any form whatsoever has been extended to any employee of the City of Renton Washington nor have I rented or purchased any equipment or materials from any employee of the City of Renton;I further certify that the attached ?nal estimate is a true and correct statement showing all the monies due me from the City of Renton for work performed and material furnished under this contract;that I have carefully examined said ?nal estimate and understand the same and that I hereby release the City of Renton from any and all claims of whatsoever nature which I may have,arising out of the performance of said contract,which are not set forth in said estimate. x /,L,.£.m/ on rac o utnorized signature Required v\/I\ Printed Signature Name City of Renton Certification I certify the attached ?nal estimate to be based upon actual measurements,and to be true and correct.Apprciv te}I ranspoat esign 2:er Signatufe 5 City of Renton Acceptance The City of Renton hereby accepts the completed contract,pursuant to Section 1»O5.12 of the Contract Provisions. X Pu5 ic Worlis Administrator Date or Council Acceptance Contractor's claims,if any,must be included,and the Contractors Certi?cation must be labeled indicating a claim attached. AGENDA ITEM #7. h) Denis Law Mayor Public Works Department -Gregg Zimmerman,P.E.,Administrator May 4,2018 GrantJansen President Jansen,inc. 1215 W.Holly Street Bellingham,WA 98225 RE:Main Avenue S (S 3”‘Street to Mill Avenue 5)Project,CAG-16-117,Final Contract Voucher Certificate Grant Jansen: Attached is the Final Contract Voucher Certificate.Please sign and return it at your earliest convenience.If you refuse or are unable to sign,please let us know.if you do not respond within 14 days of the date of this letter,we will proceed with unilateral acceptance. Sincerely, ?t/vul/"’\—$ Robert M.anson,.E. Transportation Design Manager City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98057 -rentonwa.gov AGENDA ITEM #7. h) _6 Denis Law Mayor $ May 15'2018 Public Works Department —Gregg Zimmerman,P.E.,Administrator Grant Jansen President Jansen,Inc. 1215 W.Holly Street Bellingham,WA 98225 RE:Main Avenue S (S 3”‘Street to Mill Avenue 5)Project,CAG-16-117,Notice of Establishment of Completion Date and Unilateral Project Acceptance Sent via US Postal Service Certified Mail Grant Jansen: This letter notifies you of the impending establishment of a Completion Date for the above-mentioned project.In accordance with WSDOT Standard Specification 1-093,the City will establish a project Completion Date and unilaterally accept completion of the contract.The City hereby provides the required 30 calendar days from the date of your receipt of this notice.After the 30 day period,the City will proceed with final acceptance. ert M.Hanson,P.E. Transportation Design Manager City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98057 -rentonwagov AGENDA ITEM #7. h) ProgressPayment#Cuto[[Date.Contractor:ContractedAmountOriginalContract$1,957,257.53ChangeOrders$543,378.34CurrentlyContracted$2,500,635.87Thisprogresspaymentestimateshallnotbeusedasevidenceofperformanceorquantitiesnorconstruedasacceptanceofonyworkunderthecontract.Thisprogresspaymentestimateservesonlyasobasisforthepartialpaymentindicatedherein.12t-31/20h50JPERTEETansenInc.1215WHollyStreetBellingham,WA98225ContractorReg#JANSEI*088BAPhone#360-933-4807Project:505FifthAve.S.Suite300,Seattle,WA,98105P206.4360515MainAvenueS(53rdStreettoMillAvenue5)CityofRentonProjectNumber:CAG-16-117TIBNumber:8-1-102(036)-iPROGRESSPAYMENTSUMMARYAmountThisProgressTotalAmounttoDatePaymentContractBidItemWork$2,418,835.82$569.99MaterialsonHand$-$SalesTaxStvteDORRulelllIncludedinunitbidpricesinSchec/uleA.$31,580.42$LessRetainoge(5%)$(120,941.78)$(28.50)PaymenttoContractor$2329474.46$541.49PreparedbyJon1/nHowe,OfficeEngineer(Periet)afrl.DateReviewedby:Reviewedby:Reviewedby.:Approvedby:Approvedby:Dateft/ti.CameronTravers,VicePresident(Jonsenmc)ShownShirey.ResidentEngineer(Perteet)&t(JdeUB,llMitchehProjectManager!Perteet),tetJ—Ke,thPtoJejer(OtyoffdQ?iHasoTosportto0gMoge(CtyofReton)Date”Date:Date:Date:/‘/y()AGENDA ITEM #7. h) ProgressPayment#CutofiDate:Contractor:1/31/201512Project:0PERTEET505FifthAve.S.Suite300,Seattle,WA,98105IP206.436.0515ContractedAmountOriginalContract$1,957,257.53ChangeOrders$543,378.34CurrentlyContracted$2,500,635.87PROGRESSPAYMENTSUMMARYAmountThisProgressTotalAmounttoDatePaymentContractBidItemWork$2,418,835.82$569.99MaterialsonHand$-$-SaleslaxStatDORRul171Includedinunitbidprice.sinScheduleA.$31,580.42$-LessRetainage(5%)$(120,941.78)$(28.50)PaymenttoContractorJ_$2,329,474.46_J_$541.49Preparedby:Reviewedby:Reviewedby:Revievedby:Approvedby:Approvedby:JordanHowe.OfficeEngineer(Perteet)CameronTrovers,14cePresident(/onsenlao)ShownShireyResidentEngineer(Perteet)BillMitchellProjectManagerPerteet)KeithWoo/Icy.ProjectManager(CityofRenton)BobHanson,TransportationDesignManager(CityofRentan)Date:Dote:Date:Dote:Date:Date:Thisprogresspaymentestimateshallnotbeusedasevidenceofperformanceorquantitiesnorconstruedasacceptanceofanyworkunderthecontract.Thisprogresspaymentestimateservesonlyasabasisforthepartialpaymentindicatedherein.JansenInc.1215WHollyStreetBellingham,WA98225ContractorReg#JANSEI*088BAPhone#360-933-4807MainAvenueS(53rdStreettoMillAvenue5)CityofRentonProjectNumber:CAG-l6-117TIBNumber:8-1-102(036)-IAGENDA ITEM #7. h) Progress Payment #2 P E RT E E r CusffDte /31/2018 SOS Fjfth S S?3OO,WA.98O4 P2O.436 OI5 Progress Poyment Details Contracted:P,evous Total to Date:This Estitttote:Total to Date: P,eojoo Qmotity to P,eo:oa Total A,oooot To Qooty Th:s PetoettltnoNoDpt:ot Units Qty.UmtPt.ce CatttootedAotooot Data Dato Estieate AtooetThEstieata:Q.aotitytoDote Complete TotolAmoostToDate ShdlA R dw phnp mit —I M ,:...han9e EST I $50,00000 $50,00000 1056,95 $0,56195 -829468 $(8,29468)226727 5%$2,267.272RoodmoySoooey:q LS $8,495.92 $18,495.92 I 00 $8,495.92 000 $100 00%$8,495.923RecotdDtamsogs(M.::’.,,”8sd$5.O00)CS $5,000.00 $5,00000 000$-0.00$0.00 0%$-4 SPCC Rae LS I $2,65455 $2,654.55 100 $2654.55 000 $.00 00%$2,654.555TypeBPtogtessSchedolefM.n:momB:d$5,000).5 l $5,000 00 $5,000.00 1.00 $5.00000 0.00 $-.00 00%$5,000.006Mob:booot:osc IS I —$90,000 00 $90,000.00 .00 $90,00000 000 $1.00 00%$190,000007PtojectTcmpota,yTtoll:cCoetsol 1.5 I $242,5)7.00 $242,517.00 .00 $242,517.00 0.00 $-1.00 100%$242,517 008Ttaf{:cCoettolSupeso:sos tS $41,99337 $41,993.37 1.00 $41,99337 0.00 $1.00 00%41,993.379UcdotttsedPol:ceOlt.ce,HR 40 $11680 $4,672.00 000 $-000 $-0.00 0%-10 Remooal at Stsocto,e aed Obstsoct:ae 1.5 I $35,329.37 $35,32937 1.00 $35,32937 0.00 $1.00 100%35,329.3711RoodmayEocacot:oa ccl,Hod CV 910 $42,11 $38,320.10 614.80 $67,999.23 0.00 $‘1614.80 177%67,999.2312C:oshed Swfac:tsg Bose Cousse TON 1,130 $25.99 $29,368.70 929.63 $24,16108 0.00 $-92963 82%24,161.0813HMACLI/2PG64-22 TON 900 $0386 $93,474.00 1117.26 116,03862 0.00 $-1117.26 124%116,0386214RotoogBuommousPooemeetSY2230$4.83 $0,770.90 2224.50 $10.74434 000 $-222450 100%0,74434ISTemposcoyPoaemettTON50$170.62 $8,531.00 20559 $34,736.53 0.00 $-20359 407%34,7365316CesceatCoecPocemeetCV250$394.76 $98,690.00 232.70 91,860.65 0.00 $-232.70 93%91,860.6517CulosedCeteeetCoecPocemeotACV32$85505 $27,361.60 30.20 $25,822.51 000 $-30.20 94%25,822 5118ColosedCemectCoacPaoe,eeot B CV 50 $87863 $26,35890 2810 $24,689.80 0.00 $-28.10 94%24.6895019CetceatCoecF:)Wall CS I $4,488 06 $4,488.06 I 00 $4,488.06 000 $-.00 100%4.4880620DteI.oa5tosmSeooesRpe8ln.D:oes.CF 30 $69.66 $11,658.40 27800 $24,931.04 000 $‘278.00 214%24,9310421Duct.le l,ae Stotm Semet Pipe 12 Ia.D:am.CF 180 $10483 $8,869.40 229.00 $24,006.07 0.00 $-229.00 127%24,0060722Cu,scgotedPolyethyleeeStotmSeeesP:peI2le.D:om CF 260 $58.32 $15,163.20 56.00 $3,265.92 000 $-56.00 22%$3,265.9223BockRuaGtavellosTtettchBockt:Il TON 180 $2679 $4,822.20 156.90 $4,203.35 000 $-56.90 87%4.2033524CatchBas:t Type I EA 6 $959.37 $5,756.22 900 $8,634.33 0.00 $.9.00 150%8,634.3325CatchBaseTypeILEA3$1.061 02 $3,183.06 300 $3,183.06 0.00 $‘3.00 00%$3,1830626CatchBootType248aDoom.EA I $2,581.93 $2,581.93 000 $‘000 $-0.00 0%$-27 CotchBoseType254ln.Doom EA 1 $3,888.00 $3,888.00 1.00 $3,888.00 0.00 $‘00 100%3,888.0028AdjostStotmDta:eage St,uctuse EA IS $200.70 $3,010.50 400 $80280 0.00 $-4.00 27%8028029AdjostStosmCieoooattoG.ode BA 2 $18816 $376.32 100 $188.16 0.00 $-1.00 50%188.1630Ceeeect:ot to Dsa:noge Sttoctu,e EA 4 37631 $1,505.24 500 $1,881 55 0.00 $-500 125%1,881.5531Esos,oe/Wote,PoIlot:oc Coettol EST I 35,00000 $35,000.00 9100.31 $9,100.31 000 $-9100.31 26%$9,100.3132PsopettyResiotot:on EST I 5,000.00 $5,00000 2066.24 $2,066.24 0.00 $-2066.24 41%5 2,066.2433Topso,ITypeA CY 75 $56.23 $4,217.25 8030 5 4,515 27 0.00 $-80.30 107%$4,515.2734Botko.Wood Ch:p Molch CV 5 76.87 $461.22 0.40 $79945 000 $-10.40 173%$799.4535PSAmeloech.et oem ‘jFS’ARB’/Spoeg Flutsy Seso:cebetty,2 5 Cal -12-14’Ht BA 3 356.59 $069.77 3.00 $1,06977 0.00 $-3.00 100%$1,069.7736PSFothesg:lIo gatdee.:‘Blue Moo’)Bloc Moo Dmo:l Fotheg:lIo;2 Gal.Coat BA 9 21.75 $195.75 9.00 $19575 000 $-9.00 100%$195.7537PSHekeoeomala‘Pu:pusea Nuca’/Dmotl Hebe BA 16 $23.01 $368.16 1600 $36816 0.00 $-6.00 00%$368.1638PSSp:taealapoe:co’Voa’.’DcublePloyGoldSp:seo;2Gol Coat EA 7 $24.64 $172.48 7.00 $17248 0.00 $7.00 100%$172.4839PSWe:gelo lloc:do ‘El0::0,’M,dc:.3ht Watt We:gela,2 Gal.Coos.EA 17 $22.34 $37978 1700 $37978 0.00 $-17.00 100%$379.7840PSPeee.sctomotseetale’KasleyRose’/RokFoocta:tGsoss,2Gol.Coet.BA 7 $2464 $172.48 7.00 $17246 0.00 $7.00 100%$172.48 AGENDA ITEM #7. h) Progress Poyment #12 CctaftDaie.’1/31/2018 0 ?‘ SOSFthbA,’e S Sccte300 Seo,tle WA.98104P2064360515 Progress Payment Details —Coottocted:Pteo,ocs Total to Dote:This Estitetote:Total to Date: P,ec:oos Qcont:ty to P,ecocs Total A,nccnt To Qoantity Th:s Pe,onotIteonNo.Desce:ptioo Uiti Qty.Una Pnoe Conttootad Ansocot Date Dote:Estanote Ao,oott This Est:tnate’Qcant:ty to Dote Contplete Total Ao,ocot To Dote41P5Seslacaact001:5 Actcocn Moot Gto5s;2001.Cont.EA 18 $2175 $39150 1800 $39150 0.00 $.18.00 00%$391.5042P5Heme:ocall:s ‘Pasple d’Oto/Potpie d’Oto Doyldy;I Gal.Coot.EA 25 $1543 $38575 25.00 $38575 0.00 $-2500 100%5 3857543PSlccocaeono’My.etocoRoby’/MytetatotRobyWieterHeoth.lGol.Cont EA 26 $15.15 $393.90 2600 $39390 000 $-2600 00%3939044PSVeott:copcdcnccIot:s’Geotg:aBlue/GeoegtaBlceSpeednsell,lGol.Cont EA 50 $15.43 $77150 5000 $77150 000 $-5000 100%771.5045CetceotConc.TtalhcCctbondGuttet LF 640 $32.31 $2067840 0.00 $-0.00 $.000 0% 46 CetoentConc.VolleyCutb IF 340 $24.01 $8,16340 0.00 $.0.00 $-0.00 0%-47 lntegtolCccb LF 31 $107.96 3,346.76 0.00 $0.00 $-000 0%48 Eat,cdedCccb LF 30 $36.14 1,084.20 30.00 $1,084.20 0.00 $-3000 00%1,084.2049CenteotCoocPlontetBood15ISO$2409 3.613 50 000 $-000 $-000 0% 50 Cecnent Coon.Dt:oeonoy Enttance —SY 220 $92.45 $20,339.00 193.80 $17,916.81 0.00 $-9350 88%17,9;6 8;SI Psecost Banspec Cctb EA 4 $132.87 53148 4.00 $53148 0.00 $-400 00%$5314852Ro:td Ponetnent Matket Type 1 HUND 20 $372.04 $7,44080 2000 $7,44080 0.00 $-2000 100%$7,440.8053RacedPooementMatke,Type 2 HUND 2 $531.49 06298 2.00 $1,06298 0.00 $-200 00%$1,0629854Mooc:tceytCoseaodCocet EA 2 $537.96 $1,07592 2.00 $1,075.92 000 $-2.00 00%$1,0759255CententCooc,5:dentalk SY 800 $55.92 44736.00 0.00 $.QQQ $‘000 0%$-56 Th,ckeoedtdge5:deonolk LF 370 $786 $2,908.20 0.00 $‘0.00 $-000 0%-57 Medcsm Sandblast F:n:sh SP 2150 $4.59 9,86850 858.00 $3,938.22 C 00 $.85800 40%3,938.2258AccentConctetePaoetSF135$74.22 10,01970 124.00 $9,20328 000 $.12400 92%9,203.2859CementConc.CobRampTypePetpendoaloeA EA 2 $1.28841 2,57682 000 $.000 $-0.00 0% 60 CententConc CccbRotnpTypeS:ngleD:tect:onA EA I $1,80702 $1,807.02 0.00 $-000 $‘0.00 0%-61 Detectable Wo,e:nq Sasfoce SF 130 $21.24 $2,761.20 40.00 $2,973.60 000 $.40.00 08%2,973.6062MjostGasVo!oe EA 2 $210.85 $421.70 1.00 $210.85 000 $‘00 50%210.8563AdjostF,ooch:se Ut:I:ty VanS/Manhole EA 8 $21084 $1,68672 2.00 $42168 000 $-200 25%4216864ReplocententciEc,st:ng Tsolt:c 5,gnal Systent at Moe AceS 8 5 2nd St Inte,sect:oe,C:IS I $296,61389 $296,613.89 I 00 $296,613.89 000 $-1.00 00%296,613.8965Mod:t:cat:co nt Eo.s:ng T:cS,c S:gocl Systeon at Mo:o Ace S&S 3d St lnte:sect.oo,Co LS I $16,70266 $6,702 66 100 $16,70266 0.00 $.1.00 100%670256 66 LoopReploce:neetntWe.sAce5&S2ndStlnte:sect:on,Cotnplete L5 I $5,102.32 $5,10232 0.33 $1,70076 .0.33 $(1,700.76)0.00 0%67 Ecm:nat:on Systeen,Ccncplete L5 I $52,715.48 $52,715 46 1 00 $52,71548 000 $-1.00 100%52,715.4866CEDUp;:ghtLnntnaaeSpstem,Coneplete CS 1 $5,787.95 $5,7y7.95 100 $5,78795 0.00 $-00 100%5,787.9569Mod4cot:onnllntetconnectondFbetOpscSystetes,Contplete IS 1 $16,999.23 $6,959.23 .00 $6,99923 0.00 $-100 100%16,999.2370PetmonentS:gn:ng LS I $21.836,70 $21,83670 100 $21,83670 0.00 $.1,00 100%21,836.7071StteetNanteS:gns 1.3 I 5 2.65746 $2,657.46 00 $2,657 46 0.00 $100 100%2,6574672Plast.cStcpC:ne CF 250 $6.91 $1,72750 28000 $.93480 000 $-280.00 12%1.9348073PlatteCossoalkL:ne SF 770 $4.25 $3,272.50 770.00 $3,272.50 000 $-77000 00%3,272.5074HasteTtaff:cAttons EA 26 $132.87 $3,454.62 23.00 $3,056.01 0.00 $-2300 88%3.056 0175Platt:c Ra:i,ood Conss:ng Symbd EA 4 $1,03641 $4,14564 400 $4,145.64 000 $.400 00%4.1456476PontOne,4 In.I.E 60 $532 $319.20 150.00 $79800 0.00 $‘150.00 250%$7980077Plast.c L:ce,4 In.IF 320 $475 $1,52960 266.00 $1,27148 0.00 $‘26600 83%I,27 48‘78 RemaongEo:st:ngPaoetnernMatketgs LS 1 $5,686.96 $5,686.96 1.00 $5,68696 0.00 $00 100%5,686.9679WasteReceptacleEA4$67245 S 2,68980 4.00 $2,68980 0.00 $400 100%2,689.8060DoonntonsnGatentayStgnLS1$12 543.58 $12,543.58 1.00 $12,54358 0.00 $-1 00 00%$2.5435681UhhtyCab:netBasWtop LS I $1,062.95 $1,062.96 0.00 $-0.00 $-0.00 0%$AGENDA ITEM #7. h) PROJECT TOTALS WITHOUT CHANGE ORDERS Progress Payment #12 CutoufDQfe /31/2018 0 505 Ft A Ane.S.Sa.o300,Scenic WA.98104 P206 436 0615 Progress Poyment Detois Contracted:Previous Total to Dote:Tho Est:mote:Total to Dote: Precious Quont:ty to P,naouc Total Antourt To Quantity Th:s PercentIteesNa.Deecription Units Qty.UoitP,oe ControotedAntourt Dote Dora:Est:ntote AntountTh:sEsti,note:QuantitytoDote Complete TotalAntountToDote82ConcteteSootWoilISI21,641.18 $21,64118 00 21,64118 000 $‘100 00%21.641 1883ArtScupltuteFoundor:on LS 1 S 0,84213 $1084213 000 $000 $COO 0%84 LottdscopeSt,:pFenc:ttg CF (IS $25772 $29,637.80 11500 $29,63780 000 $-11500 100%29,6378085StmeetscopeFeoc,mtg LF 65 $25566 $16,617.90 7200 $8,407.52 000 $7200 111%18.4075286Veh,culot Bollstd [A 4 $47286 $1,89144 400 $1,891.44 0.00 $.4.00 100%1,8914487Resolut:ottofUt:L:tyCottli:cts [ST I $25,000 00 $25,000.00 000 $000 $-0.00 0%-85 Ut:l:tyPothdotg [ST I $5,000.00 $5,000.00 1126759 $11,267.59 000 $-11267.59 225%11,26759iSL’:tiO Pci 6.k [A 2 $1,891.43 $3,78286 2.00 $3,76286 0.00 $-200 100%3,782.86ShdIBWiImpmet 99 Ab,cjsv 1.cs::i5 Wro:Syston’(S I $5,134.18 $5,134.18 .00 $5.13418 0.00 $-100 00%5,1341891Duct:IeltsnF.pets:Ws’r:Mo:n,CIoss52:ncludingResttatnedjo:etF:tt:ngs,41n Don LF 42 $75.96 $3,038 40 4000 $3,038 40 000 $.40.00 (30%3,038 4092Doct:Ie (ton Rye ot Water Mo:n,C(ass 52 tttclud:ng Resttotttodlotnr F:tt:ngs,8 In D:or CF 90 $86.82 $7,81380 5000 $4,341.00 000 $.50.00 56%4,341 0093Duct:Ieltott Rpe Ion Wotet Mo:n,Clots 52 tncluding Restto:nedJonnt F:rtnngs,12 Itt.DAt CF 660 $12134 $80,084 40 660.00 $80,084 40 0.00 $‘66000 100%80,084.4094Shotnegot[otto Escooat:on Ttench LS I $5,30923 $5,309.23 I 00 $5,309.23 000 $-1.00 (00%5,309.2395BankRunGtocellotT,e0ch Bock/I TON 520 $23.57 $12,25640 591.61 $13,944.25 000 $-59161 114%3,944.2596Connect,on to Eonst,ng Wore:Mo:n EA 6 $944.19 $5,66514 600 $5,66514 0.00 $‘6.00 00%5,5651437ConctetelotThnustBock:ng and Deed-Mon Block CV 5 $310.27 $1,55135 1100 $3,41297 0.00 $-11.00 220%3,4129798GoteVo!oeAssentbly4ln.[A I $71378 $713.78 1.00 $7(3.78 0.00 $-1.00 00%—7(37899GoteVolceAssembly8lo[A 2 $1,12046 $2,240.92 200 $2,240.92 000 $-2.00 130%2,24092TOOGoteVolocAssemkIyl2InEA7$2,254 87 $15,784.C9 700 $15,784.09 000 $-7.00 100%15,78409CIAd1stEusr:ng Wotee Voloe Boo [A 14 $21084 $2.95175 1.00 $2,319.24 0.00 $.1100 79%2,319.24102AdjustEo:sf:ng Water Monhde EA I $421.69 $42169 0.00 $000 $-0.00 0%—323 HydtontAssembly EA 2 $4,510.50 $9,02100 2.00 $9,02100 000 $-2.00 100%9,021.0004Ro’:S..ce and Soluo9o Lost ig Hydtont [A 2 $75263 5 1,506.26 2.00 $505.26 0.00 $-200 100%I 505.26(05 Nno5n:sceConvecr,on2ie,D:om EA I $4,564 43 $4,564 43 100 $4,564 43 000 $.1.00 00%4,564.43106NonCottvecrnovin.Dam.LA 4 $1,914.57 $7,65988 6.00 $11,45982 0.00 $-600 50%11,48982ICSewImJ_______a,107 A,’,,:ti Some,Msnhclo [A 2 $421.69 $84338 100 $42169 000 5 -100 90%42169108As’.,::Snoet C:ronocn oGeade EA 3 $28112 $84336 300 $84336 0.00 $-3.00 130%8433609PV%S.,:,:s:ySeoen Rpel2 In.D,ont.CF 5 $249.33 $3,739.95 2000 5 4,986 60 0.00 $-20.00 33%4,386 60ITOSny..e:n5V’:SsntorySewerTee EA 2 $1,206 04 $2,412.08 200 $2,412.08 000 $-2.00 100%2,412.38III2a::s..,s.n,lorTteochBockl,Il TON 40 $2311 $92440 40.00 $92440 0.00 $-4000 100%924.40Mat.tloksOn H ai I Iu jii1II Schedule A $1,766.20316 $1,625,760.41 $(9,995.44)91.48%$1,615,76497ScheduleB$165,715.71 $168,56811 $-101 72%$168,568.11SolesToo2953,(LVcml CotnpfetedondPotd2’L 17ot 33/17)$1611768 $1611777 $-I00.OO9A S 1611777So/no Taot3 9,5%(WøtL Ccttrp/ered2’[’t7to 3/31.77 but poptnnet made o,t,onvferted often)$.$(73061)5 .NA $(73061)Saks Tont4tIOO%(‘Wad Compkiedofte-4’7,77)I $1394,40 $68980 S ..16729%$659.80 AGENDA ITEM #7. h) Progress Payment #12 &,taflD,ste 1/31/2018 0 SOSF,tthAoa S So,ta300,Sosttte.WA,98104:P2064t60515 Progress Payment Details Contracted:Ptevious Total to Date:Tb:s Eot:toote:Total to Dote: Preaiaus Quantity to Preotout Total Amoont To Qsoot:ty Tht PetoentItentNo.Deturiptioo Un.ta Qty Oat Ptioe Contracted Atttsoot Dote Dot Ettitnote Atnoor Ths Ettottot Qooot:ry to Dote Contplete Total Atnaaot Ta DattScheduleCS8763.17 $9.58813 $-109 4//$9.58813SaksTao45t95%(Wtk Completed and Potd2/li 77 to 3/31,77,1 5 228.52 S 228.53 $100 00%$228.53SaksToolit9.5.5 (WotkCompleted24/77to3,3t’l7buspatpmentmadeortranslerredolte)$.$3/635 $P/A $31635SaksTos@IO.QS (Watt Campletedafte,4/1/17)I $63577 $38525 $.60 60%S 38525 Total Bid Item Work (Sched.AB+C)$1 940,682.04 $803,9665 $(9,995.44)92 44/0 $1,793 92121SolesToo@95%(Work Completed and Po:d 2/1/17 to 3/31 17)$15546,20 $/6 34o 30 5 00 00($/5546130SolesTax@95%(Work Completed 2/1/17 to 3/31/17 but payment mode or transferred after)5 S (4/426.)$-N:A $(4/426.SolesTox@10.0%(WorkCompletedofter4/1/l7)$24/37 $/04505 $43297%S /04505 “oral $1,957,269.61 $820,89374 $(9,995 44)92 520’$610898.30 $1,957,269 61 $1,820,893.74 $(9,995.441 Ii’1,810,898.30 Clrorr9rd.t#1 (Boacutad) 450)Ce,vvr’Cst,;T:o:Cs,korO-o’:e:LF .640 $3231 $(20678401 000 $.007$300 011$4601 Crrvro’Crc Vo’ny CotS LF -340 2401 $(8,163.40)003 $.0.00 $000 0%$47r:lrteq:o:Cotit CF -31 $107.96 $(3,346 76)000 $.000 $‘0.00 0%-490 005,tr:r toss Pionte,tori LF ISO $24.09 $(3 6)3 10)000 $000 $-000 0/a55.0)/r,rorrtsvc 5:/toxIc 5 .800 55.92 $144,73600)0.00 $.000 $.0.00 0%o’ç.:T;,/rnvndEs’:jo5:dolk LF -370 7.86 $(2,90820)000 $.0.00 $.0.00 0%$56.01 Cament Coos.Cutb RompType Perpeo:oo.s:A EA .2 1,288 41 $(2,576 82)0.00 $.0.00 $.0.00 0%6050)CernentCono.CatbRompTypeStngleDtrecttot,A BA .t 1,807.02 $(1,807.02)000 $‘0.00 $-0.00 0%-COl.90 CementConc TtolltcCcctbondGuttet-4000PSI CF 640 32.47 5 20,78080 84550 $27453.39 0.00 $.845.50 32%$27,453.39CO1-9l Cement Cone VolleyCctb -4000 PSI CF 340 24.27 $8,25]80 6950 $1,686.77 0.00 $‘69.50 20%1,68677C01-92 Integral Cutb -4000 P51 LF 3]108.08 $3,350.48 3100 $3,350.45 000 $‘31.00 100%3,350.48COl-93 CemeotCooc.PlontetBand-4000PSI CF 150 24.17 $3,625.50 1700 $2,827.89 000 $.117.00 78%2,827.89CCi94CementConc,$tdentolk’4000P51 SY 800 56.41 $45,128 00 800.20 $45,139.28 0.00 $-800.20 100%45,139.28(tOSS okrord Edt1o Scdeoolb -4000 PSI CF 370 7.97 $2,94890 92.00 $733.24 0.00 $-9200 25%733.24C5°55o Cr,vrr:Cos;Oath RompTypePetpendtcalotA-4000 PSI BA 2 .294.53 $2,589.06 2.00 $2,589.06 0.00 $-2.00 100%$2,589.06001-97 Cv--,rrtCoss CatbRompTypeSngleDttecttonA.4’0CDPSI EA 1 1,81592 $1,815.92 300 5 5,447.76 0.00 $‘3.0 300%$5,447.76ChangeOedee#2 1 Eo.cut.d)I I_________03299 I6s-r.::Osohrsd Eoteea000lCcmyls:ot,ord0ri:o:D::osr555:rd:ectCost5lotAck WD 18 4,500.00 $81,000.00 18.00 $81,000.00 0.00 $-18.0 lOOXI 81,000.00ChangeOctet#3 (Eoecuted)—I(103-SSIRvssvdSo’rsThsRs’e EST I 3,00000 $3,000.00 0.00$-0.00$-000 O%jChangeOtter#6 (Eo.cut,d) Change O,dee #5 (Eoecuted) /00500 Igoot:Sx:rr’EST 1 25,000.00 $25,000.00 20620.08 $20.62008 0.00 $-20620.0 82%[20,620.08ChangeOtter#6 (Eoacutet) . 005101 Ad-/rd Pvgott,.s o::555 P/os EST I 76,000.00 $76,00000 70962.7 $70,962.76 0.00 $70962.7 93%$70,962.76005102/5 s’:vg Lo:,ss 5 5/v Boo %ns:x.ort E57 I 4,000 00 $4,000.00 131383 $13,13837 000 $.13138.3 32 $13,138.37ChangaOtter#7 (Boecuted)I AGENDA ITEM #7. h) Progress Payment #12 Cm,tfD,i 1/31/2018 0 PROJECT CHANGE ORDER TOTALS (EXECUID PROPOSED) Schedule A ($381.20422 $46685806 $I0.565.43 I I 25 24%I $4flA2349 — £OSFdthA.S S.te3OO SeeWA.98!O4 P2O6.436OI5 Progress Payment Details —Contacted:PreviousTotol to Dote:This Estimoie Total to Date: I PecouQuaet:tyto PouiooTotoIA,oooetTo Quoo:tyTha PoetIte,e No Dcsceptoe Uo.te Qty.Uoit P,ioa Coet,acted A,eouet Data DotS:Eteooft A,eouet This Etceote Quaetity to Dot Coepdt.Total A.eouat To Data•EöD3 T,alEcCoot:ol Rec:s:ons LS I 49,168 95 5 4t168.99 DO $49,168 99 QOD S -I 00 30%5 4d168 99l:::ps:u:yPuceet TON 5 17262 $85310 5 00 S 85310 000 6 500 00%5 8510c:d #BfE t U) A a :‘-i:W3/:9 DeleteA:ScuptueFocndot:on LS -1 10,84213 $(l0.8423)0 00 $•000 $COO 0%5CCtC4RelocotePolmESTI20,00000 5 20,000 00 9123 81 S 19.123 81 0.00 S 1912381 96%$912381C08-•05 ::tollCocdu:tondlunct:oe8oo £51 1000.00 $1,00000 54C56 $540.56 000 $-54056 54%$540.56CO8i055/culR :S:oesotMaoAoeSaodHouiaWoyS EST I 7000.00 $7,00000 584290 $5,842.90 0,00 $.5842.90 83%$5,842.90Ctd#9(E —I -‘FL ...SI 09 P:CST 8umpeCoab EA 4 132.87 $531 48 4 00 S 531.48 0.00 $-4.00 I00%[s 531.4852CtRo.ed Pavement Ma4et Type 1 HUND 2.2 372.04 $818 49 2 20 5 818.49 0.00 5 .2.20 I00%[S 818.4953C9Ru.sedPaoemaatMo!keaType2 HUND 1.2 J 531,49 1.20 S 637.79 0.00 $.20 T0ä[637.797209PLo’oStopLne LF 24 I 6.911 $65.84 24.00 $65.84 0.00 $‘24.00 00%$165.847309RustsCtoss*olk Lone SF 425 I $225.25 53.00 $22525 0.00 $.53.00 00%$225.257409PostsT:off,cA,to CA 6 J 32.87 797.22 6.00 $797.22 0.00 $‘600 100%$79722C09.107 Add:r,ocol ToII:c Sgns EST 1 ]1,000.00 1,000.00 40705 $407.05 0.00 $-407.05 41%$40705CO9-108 Shot-Curb Trolls Separator EST —I 3.500 ooj 3,500.00 3012.35 $3,012.35 0.00 $3012 35 36%$3,012 35CO9-l09 R::ob,,oerc sstollAddrt:oeaolPrecastBcmperCrab EST I —1.50000 $1,500.00 23200 $1,232.00 0.00 $‘23200 82%$.23200 angrd 461El IL fCGII-1’O RrsrDr,CleaaondGrub,andReptocethBo:ks:WoodChpMckh EST 1 1,000.00 000.00 497.0 $497.01 0.00 $-4°70’s’:I $457010hn9eOrd.r#12(Eoecui.dl 312 HMAC:2 ‘PC 04 2 TON I 103.86 $1,142.46 1100 $1,142.46 0 ocj $.12T ‘:os $42454,12 Pus::;5”:,::::/cemeer SY 91 4.83 $439.53 98.4 $475.27 0 oJ $98.4,,J,‘05%$47527hong.Or4t*i3 IC t dl I C013-lIl tsp:::,..3’.:,t:0:oetConflrcts LS 1 83.33005 83,330.05 10 $83.33005 0 0’$‘Cu ‘61%S 60,33605CO’3112 sso:r Wars uneCoelbcts S 1 115,05716 $115,057.16 1.00 $115,057.16 0.00 $.0 ‘20%$“505715c#l4(Ea I I_____ —CC’.4/3 AdOed ,oork to ,esoloe COellrC?Sbotsrcs prcpcrd P5rts seus ord ut eu S 1 26,920.66 26,920.66 .0 $26,920.66 0.0 $.1.0 10’3’4 $6WQ 661014-114 Added sorE to resolce cenSors betarro p:sprrd o..to,I,:rr sed 5oct.04 :.:.::sc 8e%oe .5 1 29,156.82 29,756.82 1.0 $29,156.82 0.0 $..0 00%$29,156.82co4-1I5 Addedsorktoresoloeconfl:ctsbetse p:Wuu :,cu::c.rg:t’te,:Af:s:.25 1 3,698.83 $3,698.83 .0 $3,698.83 0.0 $.1.0 00%$3,698 83C—.. 6015.116 Dedoct,oe foe leeorrectly issro1ed 8ce:tosd Luc 59t .S (3,813.30)$(3,8)3.30).0 $(3,813.30)0.0 $‘1.0 00%$(3,813.30)C0W7DedoctrIorIncorrec,Iylns:o:’odR:se:sondCos’su .5 1 -5 ‘1.0$-0.0$‘1.0 100%$601508 Deductroelor Incorrectly Iestoflnd R:se:condCosr:ngs LS 1 (421.69)(421,69)1.0 $1421.69)0.0 $-.0 00%$(421.69)Change Ot 6516 L:ssReploceerett’orWtllsAeeS&S2ndStlntersectron,Complere cS -I 5,102.32 $(5,102.32)1 0.0 $-0.0 $0.0 0%$6010118 5 I 2,270.75 $2,270.75 0.0 5 -.0 5 2,270.75 .0 00%$2,270.75ChangeOrder#17 (Eoecuted) .‘‘ .CC7.20 A1d04 5sC::’:go W,L::pett.cb.:::S:rneyMatkrngs EST 1 9,000.00 $9,000.00 0.0 $-8294.6 $8,294.68 8294.6 92%$8.294 68 AGENDA ITEM #7. h) Schedule B Progress Payment #12 Cord/Dote’/31/2018 $ 0 r 00 00%$(47,91281 Project Totals With Change Orders (Suited AcBsC)$2.469.377 38 Sales Tan @95%(Work Completed and Paid 2/I’ll to 3:31 (71 S /654620 Sales Tao @9.5%(Work Completed 2 (/17 to 3/31.57 but payment made or Irons/erred after I 5 24:568 Soles Taa @100%(Work Completed after 4/1 (7)$/207480 Total $2.500,7(4 06 $2,418,26583 $/6,34630 $2.35564 5 /3878.48 $2,449.846.25 $56g99 $ $56999 97.95%$2.4(8,83582 (0000’4 $/6.346.30 N:A $3355.64 (06.660.$/287348 97 99:’$2,45041624 H $2.500,714.d1 $2,449,846.25 $569.99 I $2,450,41 SOSEdIt,Am S So.te300 Smile WA,95/04 iP206 4W 05/5 Progress Payment Details Cotrracted:PreeiousTotal to Dote:This Estimate:Toto(to Dote: Precious Quantity to Precious Total Amount To Quantity Ths PercentItemNo.Description Ueits Qty.Unit Price Cootracted Amoonr Date Data,Estimate Amount Thu Estimate:Quantity to Date Corny/etc Total Amount To Date 147,91281 $147.9(2.81 $ Safes Tos 11.Y5%(Work C8setpktedondPard2.i”/lto 33ft77,1 $.5 .$.#LSV/O’$ Soles T00 (/i9,5%(Work C’ocnplered2/b7?ra 3.3t l7bsut payment made ortro,rsferred altec)5 391568 $2,769.90 5 .tI/A $276990 Safes Tao9)100.%lWorkCompktedoIter4’Z ‘I S 1)87560 S 1787560 5 10000%5 /787560ScheduleC$(421 69)$(421 69)$0 00%$(421 69) Saks Tae(795%(Work Canrpkred and Pa,d2’Z’l7to 331/3 $.$-PD?VOl $ Sales Tan 9>9.5/n (Work Cc4feted21 l7to 3’Si llbut payment made or traces/erred after)5 .$.$1>14 $ Saks Tao(7?0 0%(Work Completed after 4.)I $i42131 5 /4217 $.100 000 $(4217/ Total Change Order Work (Suited AcBsC)$52869534 S 6(4 349/8 $056543 /18 20:’S 624,91461 Soles Tao @9 5%(Work Completed and Paid 2.1,17 to 3/31/17)$I $$#D(V ‘0 5SalesTaa@95%(Work Completed 2,1,17 to 3/31.17 but payment mode or transferred after)5 29)568 $479990 5 N:A 5 2..°69 90 SolesToa@l0.0%(WorkCompletedofter4/M7)3 1185343 I 1183343 $00000.(/85343 Total $643,44445 $628,9525)$10,56643 117680.$639.5/794 $543,444.45 $628,952 $—10,56543 II $639,517.94 PROJECT TOTALS WITH CHANGE ORDERS Schedule A $2.147,407.38 $2.092.61847 $56999 97 48%$2,093.18846ScheduleB$313,628.52 $316,480.92 $‘(00 91%$3(6,48092 Saks Tan (795%(WorkCompleted and Pa,d2’O’??ta 3/31,7?)$161/768 $16,117.77 $-10000%5 /511777 Safes Tax (895,/n (Work Completed2’Z/Uto 3i3177bnr payment made or transferred after)5 29/568 $2.039 29 $NA 5 2039.29 Sales Tar(7?00%’(Work C’ampktedaber 4,7/77)$/748(20 $/2.535 40 $-109/8%$1353540ScheduleC$8,34(48 $9,16644 $‘109 89%$9,16644 Saks Tas (795%(Work Completed and Pa,d2’l.l7to 3.3173 $22852 $22853 5 /00 00%$228.53 Sales T00 3195%(WarkContpleied2 Z’l?tai’3t l?bt payment mode or transferred after.”$-$3/635 $NA $31635 Safes Too (5100%)Work Compkred after 47/3 I $59350 —$,,34308 $5780%$34308 AGENDA ITEM #7. h) AB - 2188 City Council Regular Meeting - 06 Aug 2018 SUBJECT/TITLE: Temporary Complete Closure of the Intersection of East Valley Road and SW 19th Street RECOMMENDED ACTION: Refer to Transportation (Aviation) Committee DEPARTMENT: Transportation Systems Division STAFF CONTACT: Jim Seitz, Transportation Systems Director EXT.: 7245 FISCAL IMPACT SUMMARY: There is no fiscal impact to the City by adopting the resolution. SUMMARY OF ACTION: The Washington State Department of Transportation’s (WSDOT) I-405/SR167 Interchange Direct Connector project will install a new culvert that carries Rolling Hills Creek under SR 167 and East Valley Road. The current culvert was deemed a fish barrier and is being replaced with a new fish passable aluminum structural plate arch pipe. The plan calls for the plate arch pipe to cross SR 167 and end at an 8-foot by 18-foot precast maintenance vault that falls within the intersection of East Valley Road and SW 1 9th Street. In order to construct these elements of the culvert East Valley Road between 1701 East Valley Road and 2501 East Valley Road and SW 19th Street between 200 SW 19th Street and 204 SW 19th Street must be completely closed. This will allow heavy equipment to safely occupy the intersection to excavate and set the maintenance access vault and culvert which lie within the road way limits. Access to nearby businesses will be maintained and there are alternative routes for affected residents and business clients to travel around the intersection closure. The temporary complete closure of the intersection is anticipated to occur for a period of up to four calendar days between August 24 and August 27, 2018. EXHIBITS: A. Vicinity Map B. Street Closure Limits C. Resolution STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the resolution authorizing the temporary complete closure of East Valley Road between 1701 East Valley Road and 2501 East Valley Road and SW 19th Street between 200 SW 19th Street and 204 SW 19th Street for up to four calendar days between August 24 and August 27, 2018 to construct the Rolling Hills Creek Culvert crossing at East Valley Road as part of the WSDOT I-405/SR167 Interchange Direct Connector project. AGENDA ITEM #7. i) Exhibit A Vicinity Map azna 5x omu 3:vmmLutnumg.»V5,“)J‘ Renton 5'(RiverecyciersRHFares!. 1» V >andVi/‘eklvianii 5 My mum I ‘ \ King County South “Treatmen1P|ant 5 9 9 TugdllaFgmil9FunCgnler8.... 6‘T E5)LA ROSA MEADOWS SOUTHCENTER , ‘BestBuy9 AGENDA ITEM #7. i) :._!zzoranuz.o<»mn_<ox>m._._<>HE.._KOFUMZZOUEmmavnzumuz<:umm~z_5.mm.ma!winSEE.xo?swx.nwmh.E:€mo.u...zonua?mzoumomamma?mx.._>5..5....3...z.nwxouzu.oz._.SEnzwnmuE355.5a.ux.u.muaHVHIB.5.Etc...“:5ax:..wu.::..ma:.§.§:§....=.s..=.§.uvmas.3:2OF<-m02.003..D(0K)w..._<>.Ndpwwlum1.Euwnm‘Sauna.:_n_z:.m..z=>.9..........._.z_....M._.....m..._.......,.,,.._........9u_....:.atwwmuu<AI...£..5...?5.5.25.=5...2.9..._mE=__,.magma,®:3,a_;e.;..8._.._.3:9.«scan.0..o:umxE_Ln.:3:556.2.25...35.:.:_....9.s...§..:.a..oz_23.;:_.__..:..=.2:..=(1.11xmot,.nnzmum..anAlzmnzu+IV:an®.3®.3@m._m._._uIWm=PEa_Tm_=D.—mD_:3.5.5.89.25oz=zws.u.E=_E5......E9....:.85c._:U_wmm:335.55:82......5.......o:58.6..<...,mm~.=859.8.ozzzwzwié.3.3.3E5;...3.3.9.535.;3.232u:z_9a8.E.25..5528u_..s...a_§=:mz85.$233.2.;z9§s282.2...:mm225..35.....§3d2.5.9.2..9...:.9...z...2%3:.1.5..9253..zo:$.m..o2.85.9.2585..z_mm:5.»9.2....EE....3.9.HEEXE3......3.35.565..W...mzo?9...3....52.E522m:59:.mzo_.6o...§_5......us...::mu...1:.9.2.5...5.8..1032...m.u2_u.&m2%9:.5.,2.a::n..o$5:._Eox2.52.4:Iaz_ou<.:muse...mmmuu<4_b.99..w_$....%._........_.Jis.e©%..\e@@,.\.\®@.M.I..|..I..l.Iv.I..Iv.l.Iv.I..Iv.2.:27Wem3.dmonWwngm?wnzm?§Em>sS.ESmw:E_._$.:4wO_OEmbmmEexm$235..wzo.mn<u_E.<...3Aunizo._m..z=a:_»m5.3.5zo=.E.T.S-34...:....§..__...._........2.H......._.......u...3...\.5.3..59.sag_Sued..sw...2.:my....:.w..3:.5::..2.®..3.....2.....3.....5.EB:..33.....3..22.::.5..3SW3525....5:.)wzwxi:92:5;m_._=>:a55...«.:xD»5;....25...._main:n:5.1...7m.::«mu<._.__7::on»aduunu.«uun.5owna.«‘myaaxa<.ux<w5omn<mx(u_mu_<zh_.E=.—.S<nunuau51xzeo.»(<n._x.3es..2.52©..3...2.....2.....2...52.53.2.aimed29.9.>m._._<>uzwzzzc:uumxm:..an.25.:1.5.._><nz:u5uc<nnu:E26..542.::.$9.PCMS#2PCMS81AGENDA ITEM #7. i) CITYOF RENTON,WASHINGTON RESOLUTIONNO. A RESOLUTIONOF THE CITYOF RENTON,WASHINGTON,AUTHORIZING THE TEMPORARY TOTAL CLOSURE OF THE INTERSECTIONOF EAST VALLEYROAD AND SW 197"STREET,BETWEEN1701 EASTVALLEYROAD AND 2501 EASTVALLEYROAD TO THE NORTH AND SOUTH,AND 200 SW 19"“STREETAND 204 SW 19”‘STREETTO THE EASTAND WEST. WHEREAS,the Washington State Department of Transportation ("WSDOT”)plans to install a culvert that conveys Rolling Hills Creek under East Valley Road,at the approximate address of 1801 East Valley Road;and WHEREAS,this construction activity will require temporary street closure along East Valley Road,between 1701 East Valley Road to 2501 East Valley Road,as well as SW 19"‘Street between 200 SW 19"‘Street and 204 SW 19"‘Street;and WHEREAS,pursuant to City Code section 9-9-3 the City Council is to authorize such closures by means of a resolution; WHEREAS,the City wishes to provide full and adequate notice to the public of the extent and nature of such closure; NOW,THEREFORE,THE CITY OF RENTON,WASHINGTON,DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTIONI.The City Council does hereby authorize the temporary total closure of the intersection of East Valley Road and SW 19"‘Street,between 1701 East Valley Road and 2501 East Valley Road to the north and south,and 200 SW 19"‘Street and 204 SW 19"‘ AGENDA ITEM #7. i) RESOLUTIONNO. Street to the east and west,for up to four calendar days,anytime during the period of August 24,2018 to August 27,2018,to allow WSDOT to install the culvert. PASSED BYTHE CITYCOUNCILthis day of 2018. Jason A.Seth,City Clerk APPROVED BYTHE MAYOR this day of 2018. Denis Law,Mayor Approved as to form: Shane Moloney,City Attorney Date of Publication: RES:1780:7/26/18:scr AGENDA ITEM #7. i) AB - 2190 City Council Regular Meeting - 06 Aug 2018 SUBJECT/TITLE: Ratification of an Indemnification Agreement and First Addendum to the Indemnification Agreement with The Boeing Company for Occupation of a Portion of the Renton Municipal Airport's Taxiway "B" RECOMMENDED ACTION: Council Concur DEPARTMENT: Transportation Systems Division STAFF CONTACT: Gregg Zimmerman, Public Works Department Administrator EXT.: 7311 FISCAL IMPACT SUMMARY: The Boeing Company will pay the city a monthly fee of $12,929.58 for up to three months (90 days), for a total of up to $38,788.74, less allowance for prorating of the first payment. The first payment is due to the city within 14 days of the effective date. SUMMARY OF ACTION: On July 26, 2018, The Boeing Company contacted the City of Renton Airport and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) requesting, on a temporary basis, to store airplanes on a portion of Taxiway “B” due to a production challenge. Its requested use of the taxiway will necessitate closure of a portion of Taxiway “B” to other uses for up to 90 days. Due to the urgent nature of Boeing’s need, the City entered into an indemnification agreement, which is subject to ratification by the City Council. Within the agreement, Boeing agreed to indemnify Renton from any liability associated with its use of the taxiway for airplane storage, and also to pay for this space at the current land lease rate. Boeing will also compensate the City for any costs it incurs as a result of its use of the taxiway. The first addendum to the indemnification agreement outlines parameters to allow Boeing personnel to provide appropriate security on Taxiway “B” during times in which airplanes are stored on the taxiway. The FAA has been participating in this situation to maintain safety at the airport. The FAA assisted with the wording of the airport’s Notices to Airmen (NOTAMs) that were issued to the flying public to make pilots aware of the closure of a portion of Taxiway “B,” and of the requirement to obtain a 2-hour prior approval from the airport for the takeoff or landing of airplanes with a wingspan greater than 89 feet. Boeing will inform the City of its actions to move airplanes onto Taxiway “B” on an ongoing basis while the indemnification agreement is in effect. EXHIBITS: A. Indemnification Agreement B. First Addendum to the Indemnification Agreement STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Ratify the Indemnification Agreement and the First Addendum to the Indemnification Agreement w ith The Boeing Company allowing airplanes to occupy a portion of Renton Municipal Airport’s Taxiway “B” for up to 90 days. AGENDA ITEM #7. j) INDEMNIFICATIONAGREEMENTTHISINDEMNIFICATIONAGREEMENT(“Agreement”),datedforreferencepurposesasJuly27,2018,ismadebyandbetweenTheBoeingCompany,aDelawarecorporation(“Boeing”),andCityofRenton,aWashingtonmunicipalcorporation(“Renton”).Forandinconsiderationofthcmutualbcncfitstobederivedandothervaluableconsiderationthesufficiencyofwhichisherebyacknowledged,thepartiesherebyagreeasfollows.1.RENTONFORBEARANCEOFENFORCEMENTACTIONSSubjecttoobjectionorcontraryguidanceissuedbytheFederalAviationAdministration,RentonagreesthatBoeingmayoccupytheportionofTaxiway“B”locatedattheRentonMunicipalAirportdepictedinExhibitA(the“Property”),andRcntonshallthenforbearfromtakingenforcementactionagainstBoeingforsuchoccupancyduringthetermofthisAgreement,RentonconfirmsithasissuedorwillissueoneormoreNoticestoAirmen(“NOTAM”)coveringBoeing’sactivityauthorizedunderthisAgreement.Anysuchoccupancyshallbesubjecttothefollowinglimitations:(a)Boeing’soccupancyofthePropertyshallbeincommonwithRentonandalllicenseesandtenantsofRenton,eachofwhichshallhavethecontinuingrightofaccesstotheProperty.(b)Boeingshallimmediatelyrelocateand/orremoveanyandallofitsproperty(includingbutnotlimitedtoaircraft,aircraftparts,machinery,andotherequipment)fromthePropertyifrequestedtodosobyRentonduetoRenton’soperationalneedssuchasmaintenance,repair,inspection,passage(whetherbyRentonoranyotherentityorperson),mitigationofsafetyorsecurityconcerns,oranyotherairportpurpose.(c)BoeingshallexerciseallreasonableeffortstoassureanyactivitiesonthePropertyshallnotresultinanydamageorinjurytotheProperty.BoeingshallberesponsibleforanydamagearisingfromtheactivityofBoeingontheProperty,andshallrepairsuchdamageor,inlieuthereofifmutuallyagreedbyRentonandBoeing,makeacashsettlementtherefor.(d)BoeingshallnotmakeanyimprovementsoralterationstotheProperty.BoeingshallholdRentonandthePropertyharmlessfromandagainstanyliensofcontractors,subcontractors,orotherpersonssupplyinggoods,services,equipment,materials,orlabortooronbehalfofBoeingattheProperty.AttherequestofRenton,Boeingshalldischargeanysuchliens.RenionMunicipalAirport—TheBoeingCompany—IndemnificationAgreementPage1of12AGENDA ITEM #7. j) (e)InitsoccupancyoftheProperty,theBoeingshallnotviolateanyapplicablelaw,ordinance,deed,restrictionorregulationaffectingthePropertyoranypartthereof.Boeingissolelyresponsibicforobtainingallnecessarypermits,licenses,andapprovalsrequiredfromanygovernmentalauthorityoragencyandshallconductitsbusinessatthePropertystrictlyinconformancewithallrequirementsofanyapplicablepermits,licenses,andapprovals.(f)BoeingisherebyadvisedthatthefollowingactivitiesareamongthoseprohibitedonRenton’sproperty,includingtheProperty:useoftobaccoproductsofanykind;possessionandlorconsumptionofalcoholicbeverages;possessionand/oruseoffirearmsorexplosives;possessionand/oruseofcontrolledsubstancesandrelatedparaphernalia.BoeingshalltakesuchstepstoenforcesuchprohibitionsasRentonshallreasonablyrequestfromtimetotime.(g)BoeingmayerectsignsorbarricadesonthePropertyonlywiththepriorwrittenconsentofRcnton,whichRentonmaywithholdinitssolediscretion.AnysignsorbarricadesallowedbyRentonshallberemovedbyBoeingattheterminationofthisAgreement.(h)Boeingwillnotconductanyfueling,maintenance,orrepairactivityofanykindonanyvehiclesorotherequipmentontheProperty.BoeingwillnotconductanywashingorcleaningofvehiclesoranyotherequipmentontheProperty.(i)NotwithstandingitsagreementtoforbearenforcementactiontopreventBoeing’suseoftheProperty,RentonreservestherighttoregulateUSCoftheRentonMunicipalAirport,includingtheProperty,therunwayandothercommonareasoutsideoftheProperty,inaccordancewithFederalAviationAdministrationrecommendationsandregulations,andwithfederallaw,aswellasenactingothersafetyandsecuritymeasuresdeemedadvisablebyRentontomitigateagainstriskscreatedbyBoeing’soccupancyoftheProperty.AsfurtherdetailedinSection7.B,BoeingagreestoreimbursetheCityforcertaincostsRentonincurstakingsuchmitigationactions.2,TERMThisAgreementshallcommenceontheEffectiveDateandshallcontinue(unlesssoonerterminatedpursuanttothisAgreement)fortheensuingninety(90)days.EitherpartymayterminatethisAgreementearlyatanytimebygivingnoticeofsuchterminationtotheotherparty,statinginsuchnoticethedateonwhichsuchterminationshallbeeffective.Inaddition,thisAgreementshallautomaticallyterminateuponanydeterminationbytheFederalAviationAdministration,whetherformalorinformal,RcntonMunicipalAii’port—ThcBoeingCompanyIndeinnilicutionAgreementPage2of12AGENDA ITEM #7. j) writtenorunwritten,thatBoeing’soccupancyofthePropertyviolatesorpotentiallyviolatesanyapplicablefederalregulationorlaw.3.FEEBoeingshallpayRcntonamonthlyfeeintheamountofTWELVETHOUSANDNINEHUNDREDTWENTY-NINEAND58/100DOLLARS(Si2,929.58)foroccupancyoftheProperty,withthefirstpaymentproratedandduetoRcntonwithinfourteen(14)daysoftheEffectiveDate,andsubsequentpaymentspayablepromptlyinadvanceonthefirstdayofeachandeverymonthduringthetermofthisAgreement.AllsuchpaymentsshallbemadetotheCityofRenton,AirportAdministrationOffice,RentonMunicipalAirport,616WestPerimeterRoad,UnitA,Renton,Washington98057.4.CONDITIONIS“ASIS,WHEREIS”;DISCLAIMERSANDWAWERS;EXCLUSIONSOFLIABILITYA.“ASIS,WHEREIS”CONDITIONWITHOUTWARRANTY.RENTONMAKESNOWARRANTIESWHATSOEVERASTOTHECONDITIONORSUITABILITYOFTHEPROPERTY.ITISSUBJECTTOTHISAGREEMENTONAN“ASIS,WHEREIS”CONDITION.B.EXCLUSIONOFCONSEOUENTIALANDOTHERDAMAGES.NEITHERRENTONNORANYRENTONPARTY(DEFINEDINSECTION4.E)SHALLHAVEANYOBLIGATIONORLIABILITYTOBOEING,WHETHERARISINGINCONTRACT(LNCLUDINGWARRANTY),TORT(INCLUDINGACTIVE,PASSIVEORIMPUTEDNEGLIGENCE)OROTHERWISE,FORLOSSOFUSE,REVENUEORPROFITORFORANYOTHERINCIDENTALORCONSEQUENTIALDAMAGES.C.WaiverofClaimsforDamagetoBoeing’sProperty.WithoutlimitingthegeneralityofanyotherprovisionofthisSection4,BoeingdoesherebyreleaseRentonfrom,andwaive.Boeing’sentireclaimofrecoveryforlossofordamagetopropertyarisrngoutoforincidenttofire,lightningoranyotherperilsnormallyincludedinan“allrisk”propertyinsurancepolicywhensuchpropertyislocatedontheProperty,whetherornotsuchlossordamageisduetothenegligenceofRenton,oritsrespectiveagents,employees,guests,licensees,invitcesorcontractors.D.WaiverofSubrogation.BoeingshallcauseitsinsurancecarrierstowaiveallrightsofsubrogationagainstRentontotheextentofBoeing’sundertakingssetoutinSection4.C.RentoriMunicipalAu-port—TheBoeingCompany—IndemnificationAgreementPage3of[2AGENDA ITEM #7. j) E.Definition.“RentonParty”meansRentonandeveryofficer,employee,agent,contractor,orinvitceofRenton(otherthanBoeing,itsdirectors,officers,employees,agents,contractors,andinvitees)andtheirsuccessorsandassigns.5.ENVIRONMENTALMATTERSA.Definitions.AsusedinthisAweernent.theterm“HazardousSubstances”meansanyhazardous,toxic,chemical,ordangeroussubstance,pollutant,contaminant,wasteormaterial,includingpetroleum,whichisregulatedunderanyandallfederal,state,orlocalstatute,ordinance,rule,regulation,orcommonlawrelatingtochemicalmanagement,environmentalprotection,contamination,orcleanupincluding,withoutlimitation,theComprehensiveEnvironmentalResponse,Compensation,andLiabilityActof1980asamended(42U.S.C.§9601etseq.),theResourceConservationandRecoveryActasamended(42U.S.C.§6901Ctseq.)oranyotherfederal,state,county,orcitylaw,oranyotherordinanceorregulationexistingorwhichmayexist.AsusedinthisAgreementtheterm“EnvironmentalLawsandRequirements”meansanyandallfederal,state,locallaws,statutes(includingwithoutlimitationthestatutesreferredtointhefirstparagraphofthisSection5.Aabove),ordinances,rules,regulationsandlorcommonlawrelatingtoenvironmentalprotection,contamination,therelease,generation,production,transport,treatment,processing,use,disposal,orstorageofHazardousSubstances,andtheregulationspromulgatedbyregulatoryagenciespursuanttotheselaws,andanyapplicablefederal,state,and/orlocalregulatoryagency-initiatedorders,requirements,obligations,directives,notices,approvals,licenses,orpermits,includingbutnotlimitedtothoseforthereporting,investigation,cleaning,orremediationofHazardousSubstancesontheProperty.B.CompliancewithLawsandRequirements.ExceptasotherwiseagreedbyRentoninwriting,Boeingshallbesolelyresponsibleatitsexpenseforobtaininganypermits,licensesorapprovals,andforpreparing,maintainingandsubmittinganyrecordsorreports,asrequiredunderapplicableEnvironmentalLawsandRequirementsforitsoperationshereunder.BoeingshallcomplywithanyandallEnvironmentalLawsandRequirementsandshallnotcause,permitorallowthepresenceofandshallnotgenerate,release,store,ordepositanyHazardousSubstancesonoraboutthePropertyinviolationofanyEnvironmentalLawsandRequirements,orinamannerwhichmaygiverisetoliabilityforenvironmentalcleanup,damagetoproperty,orpersonalinjurytoRenton,oranyotherperson.BoeingshallnotreleaseanyHazardousSubstancesintothesoil,water(includinggroundwater)orairofthePropertyorRcnconMunicipa’AitpoitThcRocingCompany—todemnilicacionAgiecmcncPagc4of12AGENDA ITEM #7. j) ontoanyotheradjoiningpropertyinviolationofEnvironmentalLawsandRequirements.orinamannerwhichmaygiverisetoliabilityforenvironmentalcleanup,damagetoproperty,orpersonalinjurytoRentonoranyotherperson.IntheeventofaspillorotherreleaseofHazardousSubstancescausedbyBoeing,itsagents,cniploycs,contractorsorinvitccsatorfromtheProperty,Boeingshallundertakeimmediateresponseasrequiredbylaw,includingbutnotlimitedtoreportingtoappropriateagencies,andshallnotifyRcntonofsameassoonaspossible.6.CONDITIONATTERMINATIONAttheterminationofthisAgreement,BoeingshallleavethePropertyinthesameorbetterconditionasatthecommencementofthisAgreement.7.INDEMNIFICATIONANDINSURANCEA.Indemnity.Boeingwillindemnify,defend,andholdharmless,RcntonandeveryRentonParty(asdefinedinSection4.E)(hereinafter“Indemnitees”)fromandagainstallactions,causesofaction,liabilities,claims,Suits,penalties,fines,judgments,liens,awards,damages,orlosses(includingbutnotlimitedtolossofgrantfunds,obligationstorepaygrantfunds,orlossofotherrevenues)ofanykindwhatsoever(hereinafter“Claims”),forinjurytoordeathofanyperson(includingwithoutlimitationclaimsbroughtbyemployeesorinviteesofBoeingoremployeesorinviteesofanycontractorofBoeing(hereinafter“Contractor”))ordamagetoorlossofanypropertyorcleanupofanydischargeorreleasebyBoeingoranyContractororviolationorallegedviolationofanylaworregulation,andexpenses,costsoflitigation,andreasonableattorneys’feesrelatedthereto,orincidenttoestablishingtherighttoindemnification,totheextentsuchClaimsariseoutoforarcinanywayrelatedtothisAgreementorthepresenceonthePropertybyBoeing,anyContractorortheirrespectiveemployeesorinvitees.BoeingexpresslywaivesanyimmunityunderindustrialinsurancewhetherarisingfromTitle51oftheRevisedCodeofWashingtonoranyotherstatuteorsource,totheextentoftheindemnitysetforthinthisparagraph.IntheeventthatBoeingissuccessfulinprovingthattheforegoingindemnityislimitedbyRCW4.24.115,Boeingshalldefend,indemnifyandholdharmlesstheIndemniteestothefullextentallowedbyRCW4.24.115.TnnoeventshallBoeing’sobligationshereunderbelimitedtotheextentofanyinsuranceavailabletoorprovidedbyBoeing.BoeingshallrequireeachContractorwhodesiresaccesstothePropertytoprovideanindemnity,enforceablebyandforthebenefitoftheIndemnitees,tothesameextentrequiredofBoeing.NothinginthisSection7.AisintendedtorequireBoeingtoindemnify,defend,orholdharmlessfromanyClaimstotheextenttheyariseoutofthesolenegligenceorwillfulmisconductofanyoftheIndemnitees.RentonMunicipalAiiport—TheRocingCompany—IndemniuicationAieemenLPage5of12AGENDA ITEM #7. j) Inadditton,totheextentnotalreadycoveredbytheprecedingparagraph,Boerngshallalsoindemnify,holdharmless,anddefendRenton,anditsdirectors,officers,employees,agents,assigns,andattorneysfromanyandallclaims,losses,damages,responsccosts,andcxpcnscsarisingoutoforinanywayrelatingtotheviolationofanyEnvironmentalLawsandRequirements,ortothegeneration,release,storage,depositordisposalofHazardousSubstances,totheextentcausedbyBoeing,itsagents,employees,contractorsandinvitecsorarisingoutofBoeing’soccupancyoftheProperty,includingbutnotlimitedto:(I)claimsofthirdparties,includinggovernmentalagencies,fordamages(includingpersonalinjuryand/orpropertydamage),responsecosts,fines,penalties,injunctiveorotherrelief(2)thecost,expense,orlosstoRentonofanyinjunctivereliefincludingpreliminaryortemporaryinjunctiverelief,applicabletotheRentonortheProperty;and(3)theexpenseofreportingtheexistenceofHazardousSubstancestoanyagencyofanystategovernmentortheUnitedStatesasrequiredbyapplicablelawsorregulations,beforeandafteranytrialorappealtherefromwhetherornottaxableascosts;allofwhichshallbepaidbyBoeingwhenaccrued.B.PaymentofCosts.AsanimplementationofBoeing’sobligationsinSection7.A,BoeingagreestobeliableforandtopayRenton,upondemandbyRentori,allcostsincurredbyRentoninconnectionwiththeenforcementofRenton’srightsunderthisAgreement,includingbutnotlimitedtothevalueoftimespentaswellasactualcostsandfeesincurredbyanyRentonPartyenforcingoractingupontheprovisionsofSections1(a)through1(i)(includingcostsincurredinthetakingofsafetyandsecuritymeasures,andreasonablefeesanddisbursementsofRenton’sin-houseattorneysand/orretainedlegalcounsel).SuchliabilityshallsurvivetheterminationofthisAgreement,theentryintothePropertybyRcnton,andthecommencementofanyactionbroughtunderorrelatingtothisAgreement.AllamountsnotpaidtoRentonwhendueshallbearinterestattheannualrateoftwelvepercent(12%)or,ifless,themaximumratepermittedbylaw.C.Insurance.Boeing,atBoeing’sowncostandexpense,willprovideandkeepinfullforceandeffectduringtheTerm,commercialgeneralliabilityinsurancewithlimitsofnotlessthan$1,000,000coveringbodilyinjurytoanyperson,includingdeath,andlossofordamagetorealandpersonalproperty,orshallself-insureforthesame.InsuranceprovidedhereundermaybeprovidedunderBoeing’sblanketliabilityinsurancepolicy.DuringtheTermRentonshallhenamedasanadditionalinsuredunderinsurancecarriedpursuanttothisSection7.CtotheextentofBoeing’sundertakingsetforthinSection7andwillprovidetoRentonamemorandumevidencingsuchinsurance.RentonMunicipalAirport—TileRocintiCompany—[ndcrnnilicaiionAgicemeniPage6of12AGENDA ITEM #7. j) 8.DEFAULTOFBOEINGThefollowingshallconstituteeventsofdefaultbyBoeing:(a)Boeing’sfailuretomaintaininforceorpaythepremiumforanypolicyofinsuranccrcquircdtobeobtainedormaintainedbyBoeingpursuanttothisAgreement;or(b)AnydefaultbyBoeingofitsobligationsunderSection5(EnvironmentalMatters);or(c)Boeing’sfailuretoobserveandperformanyotherprovision,termorconditioninthisAgreementwithinfour(4)hoursafterRentondeliverswrittennoticeofthefailuretoBoeing,orimmediatelyafterRentondeliverswrittennoticeofthefailuretoBoeingifRentondeemsthefailureanimminentrisktopublichealthorsafety.9.REMEDIESOFRENTONA.TerminationandRemovalbyRenton.IntheeventofaBoeingdefault,Rentonmayinadditiontoallotherlegalorequitableremedies,(a)terminatethisAgreementbydeliveringwrittennoticeofterminationtoBoeing,andthatactionshallconcurrentlyterminateanyrightsofBoeingunderthisAgreementandreleaseRentonfromitsenforcementforbearanceunderthisAgreement,or(b)withorwithoutterminatingthisAgreement,entertheProperty,andbyanylawfulmaimer,removeBoeing.B.LiquidatedDamaLtes.BoeingacknowledgesthatanyoccupancybyBoeingofthePropertyaftertheterminationofthisAgreementwillcauseRentontoincursubstantialeconomicdamagesandlossesoftypesandinamountswhichareimpossibletocomputeandascertainwithcertaintyasabasisforrecoverybyRentonofactualdamages,andthatliquidateddamagesrepresentafair,reasonableandappropriateestimatethereof.Accordingly,inlieuofactualdamages,BoeingagreesthatliquidateddamagesmaybeassessedandrecoveredbyRentonasagainstBoeing,intheeventthatBoeingcontinuestooccupythePropertyaftertheterminationofthisAgreementandwithoutRentonbeingrequiredtoprescntanyevidenceoftheamountorcharacterofactualdamagessustainedbyreasonthereof;thereforeBoeingshallheliabletoRentonforpaymentofliquidateddamagesintheamountofEightThousandDollars($8,000)foreachdaythatBoeingoccupiesthePropertyaftertheterminationofthisAgreement.Suchliquidateddamagesareintendedtorepresentestimatedactualdamagesandarenotintendedasapenalty.RenionMunicipalAirport—TheBoeingCompanyIndemnificationAwccrncniPage7o112AGENDA ITEM #7. j) C.RemediesCumulative.EachrightandremedyprovidedforinthisAgreementshallbecumulativeandshallbeinadditiontoeveryotherrightorremedyprovidedforinthisAgreementornoworhereafterexistingatlaworinequityorbystatuteorotherwise,andtheexerciseorbeginningoftheexercisebyeitherpartyofanyoneormoreoftherightsorremediesprovidedforinthisAgreementornoworhereafterexistingat1aworinequityorbystatuteorotherwiseshallnotprecludethesimultaneousorlaterexercisebysuchpartyofanyorallotherrightsorremediesprovidedforinthisAgreementornoworhereafterexistingatlaworinequityorbystatuteorotherwise.10.NOWAIVERNofailurebyeitherpartytoinsistuponthestrictperformanceofanyagreement,term.covenantorconditionhereofortoexerciseanyrightorremedyconsequentuponabreachthereof,andnoacceptanceoffuflorpartialrentbyRentonduringthecontinuanceofanysuchbreach,shallconstituteawaiverofanysuchbreachorofsuchagreement,term.covenant,orcondition.Noagreement.term.covenant,orconditionhereoftobeperformedorcompliedwithbyeitherparty,andnobreachthereof,shallhewaived,alteredormodifiedexceptbyawritteninstrumentexecutedbytheparties.NowaiverofanybreachshallaffectoralterthisAgreement,buteachandeveryagreement,tenn,covenantandconditionhereofshallcontinueinfullforceandeffectwithrespecttoanyotherthenexistingorsubsequentbreachthereof.Ii.MISCELLANEOUSA.SuccessorsandAssigns.SubjecttotheprovisionsofthisSection11,alloftheprovisionsofthisAgreementshallhindandinuretothebenefitofthepartiesandtheirrespectiveheirs,legalrepresentatives,successorsandassigns,butBoeingshallnotassignthisAgreementinwholeorinpartwithoutthepriorwrittenconsentofRenton,whichRentonmaywithholdinitssolediscretion.B.Notices.Whereprovisionismadehereinfornoticeofanykind,itshallbedeemedsufficient,ifsuchnoticeisaddressedasshownbelow:Renton:AirportManagerRentonMunicipalAirport616WestPerimeterRoad,UnitARenton,Washington98057RentonMunicipalAüpoi-t—ThcRocingCompany—IndemnificationAgreementPage8of12AGENDA ITEM #7. j) Boeing:TheBoeingCompanydoMBGConsulting,Inc.BoeingLeaseAdministrationTeam980N.MichiganAvenue,Suite1000Chicago.IL606J(-4521Allsuchnoticesshallbegiveneitherbyhandorbyrecognizedovernightdeliveryservice,withallfeesfornextbusinessdaydeliveryprepaid.Noticesshallbedeemedgivenwhendeliveredifgivenbyhandor24hoursafterdeliverytoanovernightdeliveryservicewithnextbusinessdaydeliverychargesprepaid.Formalnoticemaybeaccompaniedbyacourtesynoticedeliveredviatelephonecallorelectronicmail.C.Severahili’.Ifacourtofcompetentjurisdictionshalldetermine,toanyextent,thatanyprovision.termorconditionofthisAgreementshallheinvalidorunenforceable,thatdeterminationshallnotaffecttheremainderofthisArccmcnt,andeachprovision,termorconditionintheremainderofthisAgreementshallbevalidandenforceabletotheextentpermittedbylaw.D.NoInterestinProper.BoeingagreesthatithasnorightinthePropertyandthatnoneiscreatedbythisAgreement.E.Attorneys’FeesandDisbursements.ExceptforactionsbyRentonpursuanttoSection9ofthisAgreementuponadefaultbyBoeingandexceptforBoeing’sindemnificationobligationsunderSection7ofthisAgreement,ifadisputebetweenRentonandBoeingarisesunderthisAgreement,eachpartyshallbearitsowncosts,includingbutnotlimitedtoattorneys’fees.F.Captions.ThemarginalheadingsortitlestothesectionsofthisAgreementarenotapartoftheAgreementbutareinsertedonlyforconvenience.TheyshallhavenoeffectontheconstructionorinterpretationofanypartofthisAgreement.G.TimeisoftheEssence.TimeisoftheessenceintheperformanceofallcovenantsandconditionsofthisAreernentinwhichtimeisafactor.RentonMurncipalAirport—TheBoeingCompanyIndemniticationArccmcnPage9of12AGENDA ITEM #7. j) IT.Counterparts.ThisAgreementmaybeexecutedinanynumberofcounterparts.eachofwhichwhenexecutedanddeliveredshallconstituteanoriginalAgreement,butallofwhichtogcthershallconstituteoneandthesameAgreement.1.ChoiceofLaw.ThisAgreementshallbegovernedbytheLawsoftheStateofWashington,withoutreferencetoitschoiceoflawrules.J.NoRecordjna,Neitherpartyshall,recordthisAtrecnient.noranymemorandumofthisAgreement.K.SuHvaLBocin’sindemnificationohlieationssetforthinthisArecmcntshallsurvivetheexpirationorearlyteiminationofthisAgreementandshallnotbelimitedbyanyprovisionofthisAgreement.L.CompleteAgreement.ThisAgreement.includingExhibitA,containstheentireandcompleteagreementbetweenthepartieshereto,withallpreviousnegotiations,warranties,covenants.conditionsandpromisesbeingmergedherein.RcntonandBoeingfurtheragreethai.noalteration,amendmentormodificationtothisAgreementshallbebindinguponRcntonorBoeingunlesssameisfirstreducedtowritingandsignedbybothRcntonandBoeing.M.EffectiveDate.ThisAgreementshalltakeeffectonthedatesignedlastsignedbelowbytheparties(the“EffectiveDate”).N.RentonCityCouncilRatification.ThepartiesagreethatthisAgreementrespondstoanemergencysituationcausingRentontohaveexecutedthisAgreementpriortoreviewbytheRcntonCityCouncil.Accordingly,thisAgreementissubjecttoRentonCityCouncilconsideration,andRentonwillpresenttheAgreementtotheRentonCityCouncilatitsfirstavailabilityaftertheExecutionDate.iftheRenLonCityCouncilconsiderstheAgreementanddoesnotratifyit.thentheAgreementwillautomaticallytcnriinatewithnoliabilityorfurtherobligationarisingonthepailofRenton.RntonMunicipalAirpoit—Tlict3ociiigCompany-fndemniflcaionAgieemcnPagc10o112AGENDA ITEM #7. j) Eecutedbytheparties:TheBoeingCompanya:Ert+T.N1oItsDateSigned:722/TheCityofkentonBy:5eq41/cGreiiimcrrnan,P.E.For:DenisLawitsMayorDateSigned:2-7,,2O)’ifRcnionMunicipalAtiport—TheBoein(ompanvIndemnilicationAgreementPare11of12AGENDA ITEM #7. j) EXHIBITAI--ReritonMunicipalAirport—TheBoeingCompany—TndernniicatonAgicementPage12o112AGENDA ITEM #7. j) \300’OFFRUNWAY200’0FFRUNWAY\49200’OFFRUNWAY46‘\•,N4948N,‘A50••---1-‘,-4950•---AU•.,‘,N’--48-•-9’AGENDA ITEM #7. j) Renton Municipal Airport – The Boeing Company – First Addendum to Indemnification Agreement Page 1 of 2 FIRST ADDENDUM TO INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT THIS FIRST ADDENDUM (“Addendum”), made on the last date written below, amends that certain Indemnification Agreement made by and between The Boeing Company, a Delaware corporation (“Boeing”), and City of Renton, a Washington municipal corporation (“Renton”), dated July 27, 2018 (“Agreement”). For and in consideration of the mutual benefits to be derived and other valuable consideration the sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby agree as follows. 1. Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 1(f) or any other provision contained in the Agreement, Boeing shall have the right to provide reasonable protection at the Property for its employees, visitors, contractors, and all other persons visiting or working at the Property and for its aircraft and equipment located at the Property. Renton acknowledges that Boeing’s efforts to provide protection may include the presence at the Property of armed security personnel, subject to the following requirements. Armed personnel (who may include employees of Boeing and/or contracted personnel) may carry concealed or open carry weapons but all such personnel: (i) shall possess, carry, and use weapons in compliance with all applicable legal requirements; (ii) shall be authorized by Boeing's chief security officer to provide security services; (iii) shall have received appropriate training on weapons safety and on the appropriate use of force; and (iv) shall be identified with a security badge or marking and shall be distinguishable from law enforcement personnel. Boeing’s protection actions shall not risk the safety or security of any other user of the Property. Boeing is solely responsible for verifying that the activities allowed hereunder are permitted under all applicable legal requirements. If Boeing or contractor personnel deploy weapons at the Property, Boeing shall immediately provide oral notification to Renton and shall file a written incident report with Renton no later than the next business day. Boeing acknowledges that its indemnification obligations under the Agreement extend to any Claims that arise out of or are in any way related to this paragraph. 2. Boeing acknowledges that any persons on the Property will be in a movement area of the Renton Municipal Airport and, accordingly, shall coordinate with the airport tower, monitor a radio for air traffic, or both. Boeing shall train and control all personnel and vehicles to comply with the requirements of this paragraph. 3. As amended by this Addendum, the Agreement continues in full force and effect in accordance with its terms. This Addendum is executed by Boeing and Renton as of the dates written below. AGENDA ITEM #7. j) Renton Municipal Airport – The Boeing Company – First Addendum to Indemnification Agreement Page 2 of 2 The Boeing Company The City of Renton By: ______________________ By: __________________________ Gregg A. Zimmerman, P.E. Erik T. Nelson For: Denis Law Its VP, Field Operations and Delivery Its Mayor Date Signed: _______________ Date Signed: ___________________ AGENDA ITEM #7. j) AB - 2191 City Council Regular Meeting - 06 Aug 2018 SUBJECT/TITLE: 2019-2024 Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program RECOMMENDED ACTION: Refer to Transportation (Aviation) Committee DEPARTMENT: Transportation Systems Division STAFF CONTACT: Heather Gregersen, Program Development Coordinator EXT.: 7393 FISCAL IMPACT SUMMARY: N/A SUMMARY OF ACTION: The City is required by law to annually review the Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and adopt the update to the program by Resolution. Changes from the 2018-2023 TIP include the following: 1. Interactive Online Map (http://www.rentonwa.gov/TIPMap): In addition to having a map index in Section B, there is an interactive online map of the 2019 -2024 TIP. When a user clicks on a project within the map, a dialog box opens up with information about that project and a link to the individual TIP sheet . 2. Reorganized TIP Numbering Framework:The TIP project numbering system starts with standard transportation system programs that have been in place for many years. This way, the TIP numbers for these programs will remain the same for future TIPs. The next grouping of projects in alphabetical order consists of projects with full or partial funding secured, such as with federal or state grants, developer contributions, or where the City has a financial co mmitment to implementing within the 6-year period. The last group of projects, where the projects start over in alphabetical order, are unfunded local projects or outside agency led projects, that have been identified in other long -range plans for the City. 3. Page Layout of Reports: The format of the report has been changed to a portrait layout so the reader does not have to change direction when reading from front to back. 4. The Arterial Rehabilitation Program (TIP No. 2) and Walkway Program (TIP No. 3) annual expenditures have been used as the local match for grant applications.If the City is awarded those grants, the project TIP numbers will be a sub-project associated with the relevant program. 5. Increased funding for the Traffic Safety Program (TIP No. 6), Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Program (TIP No. 8) and Barrier Free (TIP No. 11) to help address growing service demand. 6. Revised cost estimates for existing capital projects and programs. 7. Updated grant allocations for new grant awards for Rainier Avenue South/North Phase 4 (TIP No. 21), South 2nd Street Conversion (TIP No. 24), SW 43rd Street Pavement Preservation (TIP No. 2.2), Bronson Way Bridge – Seismic Retrofit and Painting (TIP No. 15), Houser Way Bridge – Seismic Retrofit and Painting (TIP No. 17) and Williams Avenue Bridge – Seismic Retrofit and Painting (TIP No. 25). 8. Updated funding source for the Park Avenue North Extension project (TIP No. 20) to be almost fully funded by Local Revitalization Funding (LRF) and programmed the current $650,000 in traffic AGENDA ITEM #7. k) mitigation fees to the project Williams Avenue South and Wells Avenue South Conversion project (TIP No. 26). 9. Updated prioritization of projects. 10. Added the following new projects: a. Bronson Way North Bridge Repair (TIP No. 15). b. Houser Way North Bridge Repair (TIP No. 17). c. Renton Connector (TIP No. 22). d. Williams Avenue North Bridge Repair (TIP No. 25). e. Houser Way South/North Non-Motorized Improvements (TIP No. 28). f. Nile Avenue NE Bridge Repair (TIP No. 37). g. Renton Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Improvements (TIP No. 39). h. Transit Master Plan (TIP No. 40). Possible revisions to the draft TIP are anticipated pending review by the City Council, Mayor, City Administration and public comments made during the public hearing, which is set for August 20, 2018. EXHIBITS: A. Draft 2019-2024 Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program B. Resolution STAFF RECOMMENDATION: 1. Approve the annual updates to the 2019-2024 Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program. 2. Set August 20, 2018 as the public hearing date for the 2019-2024 Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program. 3. Present the Resolution for reading and adoption. AGENDA ITEM #7. k) Transportation Improvement Program 2019—2024 | Six-Year Adopted August 2018 Department of Public Works Transportation Systems Division AGENDA ITEM #7. k) Acknowledgements Mayor Denis Law City Council Ed Prince, Council President Don Persson, Council President Pro-tem Randy Corman Ryan McIrvin Armondo Pavone Ruth Pérez Don Persson Carol Ann Witschi Chief Administrative Officer Robert Harrison Public Works Gregg Zimmerman, Public Works Administrator Jim Seitz, Transportatfon Systems Director Vangie Garcia, Transportatfon Planning & Programming Manager Bob Hanson, Transportatfon Design Manager Chris Barnes, Transportatfon Operatfons Manager Eric Cutshall, Transportatfon Maintenance Manager Heather Gregersen, Program Development Coordinator 2019 – 2024 Transportation Improvement Program 1 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) Table of Contents Section A – Introduction Purpose of the Transportatfon Improvement Program 4 Renton Business Plan 5 Section B – Map and Location Transportatfon Improvement Program Map 8 Map Index 9 Section C – Development and Prioritization TIP Development Actfvitfes 11 General Programming Criteria 13 Summary of Projects and Prioritfzatfon 15 Section D – Expenditures and Revenues Funding Sources - Itemized 19 Section E – Project Descriptions Detailed Project Descriptfons 26 Section F – Appendix Abbreviatfons and Acronyms Resolutfon to Adopt Six-Year 2019-2024 TIP 2019 – 2024 Transportation Improvement Program 2 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) Section A Introduction 2019 – 2024 Transportation Improvement Program 3 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) City of Renton | 2019 - 2024 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Purpose of the Transportation Improvement Program The purpose of this document is to update the City of Renton’s future plans for transportatfon improvement programs and projects. This document is Renton’s comprehensive transportatfon program for the ensuing six calendar years and is mandated by the Revised Code of Washington and Washington Administratfve Code. The Transportatfon Improvement Program (TIP) is a multf-year planning tool for the development of transportatfon facilitfes within the City that: support the Mission and Vision of the City of Renton help achieve the goals of the Renton Business Plan reflect the involvement of City Citfzens and Elected Officials. The Transportatfon Improvement Program is a vital part of planning under the Growth Management Act and city projects must be included in the TIP to be eligible for state and federal grant programs. The Transportatfon Systems Division uses the TIP to coordinate projects and programs with other jurisdictfons and agencies. 4 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) Provide a safe, healthy, vibrant community Promote safety, health, and security through effective communication and service delivery Facilitate successful neighborhoods through community involvement Encourage and partner in the development of quality housing choices for people of all ages and income levels Promote a walkable, pedestrian and bicycle- friendly city with complete streets, trails, and connections between neighborhoods and community focal points Provide opportunities for communities to be better prepared for emergencies Promote economic vitality and strategically position Renton for the future Promote Renton as the progressive, opportunity- rich city in the Puget Sound region Capitalize on opportunities through bold and creative economic development strategies Recruit and retain businesses to ensure a dynamic, diversified employment base Nurture entrepreneurship and foster successful partnerships with businesses and community leaders Leverage public/ private resources to focus development on economic centers Support planned growth and influence decisions that impact the city Foster development of vibrant, sustainable, attractive, mixed-use neighborhoods in urban centers Uphold a high standard of design and property maintenance Advocate Renton’s interests through state and federal lobbying efforts, regional partnerships and other organizations Pursue transportation and other regional improvements and services that improve quality of life Balance development with environmental protection Building an inclusive informed city with opportunities for all Improve access to city services, programs and employment, and make residents and businesses aware of opportunities to be involved with their community Build connections with ALL communities that reflect the breadth and richness of the diversity in our city Promote understanding and appreciation of our diversity through celebrations and festivals Provide critical and relevant information on a timely basis and facilitate two-way dialogue between city government and the community Meet service demands and provide high quality customer service Plan, develop, and maintain quality services, infrastructure, and amenities Prioritize services at levels that can be sustained by revenue Retain a skilled workforce by making Renton the municipal employer of choice Develop and maintain collaborative partnerships and investment strategies that improve services Respond to growing service demands through partnerships, innovation, and outcome management Renton Business Plan 2019–2024 GOALS The City of Renton, in partnership and communication with residents, businesses, and schools, is dedicated to:MISSION Providing a safe, healthy, welcoming atmosphere where people choose to live Promoting economic vitality and strategically positioning Renton for the future Supporting planned growth and influencing decisions that impact the city Building an inclusive informed city with opportunities for all Meeting service demands through high quality customer service, innovation, a positive work environment, and a commitment to excellence Renton: The center of opportunity in the Puget Sound Region where families and businesses thrive VISION RENTON. AHEAD OF THE CURVE. 5 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) Section B Map and Location 2019 – 2024 Transportation Improvement Program 6 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) City of Renton | 2019 - 2024 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Map and Location This sectfon contains a list of all the projects listed in the 2019 - 2024 Transportatfon Improvement Program (TIP), listed by TIP number. The TIP project numbering system starts with programmatfc actfvitfes that typically have annual financial allocatfons. With this in mind, the TIP numbers for these programs will remain the same for future TIPs. The next grouping of projects in alphabetfcal order are projects with full or partfal funding secured, such as with federal or state grants or developer contributfons, or where the City has a financial commitment to implementfng within the six-year period. The last group of projects, where the projects start over in alphabetfcal order, are unfunded local projects or outside agency-led projects, that have been identffied in other long-range plans for the City. INTERACTIVE ONLINE MAP In additfon to having a map index to the map of 2019-2024 TIP projects, there is an interactfve online map where a user can click on a specific project and a dialog box opens with informatfon about that project with a link to the individual TIP sheet. The web address is: http://www.rentonwa.gov/TIPMap 7 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) City of Renton | 2019 - 2024 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2.1 38 18 35 32 2.2 21 24 26 25 15 17 37 20 41 31 29 19 45 16 36 34 47 23 27 30 28 22 42 33 46 43 39 Maintenance and Preservatfon Corridor Projects Traffic Operatfons and Safety Non-Motorized Projects TIP Number # City-wide projects are not identified on this map. TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM MAP 44 8 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) City of Renton | 2019 - 2024 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TIP No. Project Title 1 Street Overlay 2 Arterial Rehabilitatfon Program 2.1 Renton Avenue S Resurfacing, S 130th St to Taylor Ave NW 2.2 SW 43rd St Resurfacing, SR 167 to west City Limits 3 Walkway Program 4 Roadway Safety and Guardrail Program 5 Intersectfon Safety & Mobility Program 6 Traffic Safety Program 7 Traffic Operatfon Devices Program 8 Intelligent Transportatfon Systems (ITS) Program 9 Sidewalk Rehabilitatfon and Replacement Program 10 Bridge Inspectfon & Repair Program 11 Barrier-Free Transitfon Plan Implementatfon 12 Project Development & Pre-Design Program 13 Arterial Circulatfon Program 14 1% for the Arts Program 15 Bronson Way N Bridge Repair, across Cedar River 16 Duvall Ave NE Roadway Improvements, NE 7th St to Sunset Blvd NE 17 Houser Way N Bridge Repair- Seismic Retrofit and Paintfng 18 Lake Washington Loop Trail, perimeter of the Renton Airport 19 NE Sunset Boulevard (SR 900) Corridor Improvements, I-405 to east City Limits 20 Park Ave North Extension, Logan Ave N to Southport 21 Rainier Ave S/N Corridor Improvements Phase 4, S 3rd St to NW 3rd Pl 22 Renton Connector, S 2nd St to S 5th St 23 116th Ave SE Improvements, Puget Drive SE to the south City Limits 24 South 2nd Street Conversion Project, Rainier Ave S to Main Ave S 25 Williams Ave N Bridge - Seismic Retrofit and Paintfng 26 Williams Ave S and Wells Ave S Conversion Project, S Grady Way to N 1st St 27 Carr Road improvements, Lind Ave SW to 116th Ave SE 28 Houser Way S/N Non-Motorized Improvements, Mill Ave S to Bronson Way S 29 Houser Way North Widening and Realignment, N 8th St to Lake Washington Blvd 30 Lake to Sound (L2S) Trail, East-West Trail connecting Lake Washington to Puget Sound 31 Lake Washington Blvd N/ Southport Access Improvements, Park Ave N to Gene Coulon Park 32 Lind Ave SW Roadway Widening, SW 16th St to SW 43rd St 33 Logan Ave North Improvements, S 2nd St to Park Ave N 34 Maple Valley Highway Barriers, vicinity of western edge of Riverview Park 35 Monster Road SW/68th Ave S Roadway Improvements, Monster Rd Bridge to City Limits 36 NE 3rd Street / NE 4th Street Corridor Improvements, Sunset Blvd N to the east City Limits 37 Nile Ave NE Bridge Repair, across May Creek 38 Rainier Ave N Corridor Improvements Phase 5, NW 3rd Pl to City Limits 39 Renton Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Improvements, S Renton Village Pl extension to S Grady Way 40 Transit Master Plan 41 South 3rd Street Conversion Project, Rainier Ave S to Main Ave S 42 South/Southwest 7th Street Corridor Improvements 43 South Grady Way Multf-Modal Improvements, Talbot Rd South to Rainier Ave South 44 South Lake Washington Transit Stop, vicinity of Southport Dr N and Garden Ave N 45 Sunset Area Green Connectfons, vicinity of Sunset Area Revitalization Area 46 SW 27th Street/Strander Boulevard Connectfon 47 Talbot Road S / S 177th St Signalizatfon and Roadway Improvements, adjacent to Valley Medical Center MAP INDEX 9 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) Section C Development and Prioritization 2019 – 2024 Transportation Improvement Program 10 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) City of Renton | 2019 - 2024 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TIP Development Activities TIP project and financial development actfvitfes are intricately intertwined and involve interactfons with many groups and agencies at the local, regional, state and federal levels. Within the Transportatfon Systems Division of the City of Renton, project development involves year-round coordinatfon between the Transportatfon Operatfons and Transportatfon Maintenance Sectfon, the Transportatfon Planning and Programming Sectfon and the Transportatfon Design Sectfon. The Transportatfon Operatfons and Maintenance Sectfon compiles accident and traffic count data, performs level-of-service calculatfons needed to identffy operatfonal/congestfon problems and tracks all transportatfon -related complaints, suggestfons and requests that come into the City. The Transportatfon Design Sectfon, through the TIP’s Overlay Program and Bridge Inspection and Repair Program, work closely with the Maintenance Services Division to establish structural ratfngs for the City’s roads and bridges. These and other data are being used by the Planning and Programming Sectfon to develop transportatfon improvement projects, prepare grant applicatfons, interface with ongoing state and federal transportatfon programs and develop a TIP that supports the goals of the City’s long-range Comprehensive Plan and current business plan. The Transportatfon Planning and Programming Sectfon works with Washington Department of Transporta- tfon, King County Metro Transit, Puget Sound Regional Council, Sound Transit and other groups and agencies to assure consistency between Renton’s transportatfon policies and programs and those of the region. Such consistency is required by the Growth Management Act and related legislatfon and by federal and state grant programs. With on-going changes to I-405 and SR 167 as well as the expansion of the Sound Transit network, especially the I-405 Bellevue to Renton Bus Rapid Transit, the City of Renton must look to creatfng and maintaining an infrastructure system to support these changes to the transportatfon system to promote economic vitality as well as providing a safe and healthy community. Ongoing transportatfon planning actfvitfes, such as updatfng the Transportatfon Element in the Comprehensive Plan and the development of sub-area plans, play an important part in identffying and prioritfzing transportatfon improvement projects. In recent years, long-range planning efforts have played a key role in the development of transportatfon projects for the City: Downtown Civic Core Vision & Action Plan, City Center Community Plan, Sunset Area Transformation Plan, and the Renton Trails and Bicycle Master Plan. All City of Renton departments and City Council are solicited each year to provide input, discuss and comment on the Six-Year TIP. Additfonal input is also gathered through interactfons with other public and private organizatfons and through public meetfngs held in the community concerning specific transportatfon projects and programs. 11 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) City of Renton | 2019 - 2024 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM At all levels of government - City, State and Federal - there are new laws and regulatfons that create the need for new or different kinds of transportatfon projects and programs that have tremendous impacts on the de- velopment and costs of transportatfon projects. Examples include the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century Act (MAP-21), the Growth Management Act, the Clean Air Act, the Commute Trip Reductfon law, the Endangered Species Act and the Surface Water Management Ordinance. Within the City of Renton, there are actfons and interactfons involving other departments and divisions, the private sector, the City Council and Administratfon, which strongly influence the directfon of the transportatfon program. For example, the transportatfon system is significantly impacted by land use decisions, private development proposals and by public water and sewer extensions which increase transportatfon demand by making possible higher density and/or intensity of land uses. Such proposals need to be monitored and analyzed in regard to how they individually and collectfvely create the need for transportatfon improvements. In summary, with its heavy dependence on many different and unpredictable sources of external funding and with the significant impacts created by ongoing local and regional land use decisions, transportatfon project development is a contfnuous actfvity comprised of a multftude of diverse elements. 12 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) City of Renton | 2019 - 2024 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM General Programming Criteria The yearly update of the Six-Year Transportatfon Improvement Program (TIP) is part of an ongoing process intrinsically linked with the development of the City’s Capital Improvement Program. The Six-Year TIP is also linked with various state and federal funding programs, regional/inter-jurisdictfonal planning and coordina- tfon processes and the City’s Growth Management Act Comprehensive Land Use Plan. Projects are developed and prioritfzed based on community needs, specific goals to be achieved and on gen- eral programming consideratfons. The general programming consideratfons include the following: PRIORITY – As shown on pages 15-17 the projects and programs are prioritfzed by type prepared by City staff with final approval by the City Council during the annual update of the TIP. The prioritfzatfon as- sists staff in assigning the limited resources to projects and programs and reducing resources during funding shortialls. In general, staff expends more resources on higher priority projects in the first three years of the TIP, and when applying for grants staff will consider these projects first unless oth- er lower priority projects better meet the partfcular criteria of a grant program. PLANNING – How, at a local and regional level, a project fits with or addresses identffied future trans- portatfon goals, demands and planning processes must be evaluated. This is strongly influenced by ongoing land use decisions and by regional highway and transit system plans. FINANCING – Many projects are dependent upon external grants, formatfon of LID’s or the receipt of im- pact fees. Prioritfzatfon has to take into account the peculiaritfes of each of the various fund sources and the probabilitfes of when and how much money will be available. SCHEDULING – If a project is interconnected with, or interdependent on, other projects taking place, this is reflected in their relatfve prioritfes. PAST COMMITMENT – The level of previous commitment made by the City in terms of resources, legis- latfve actfons or inter-local agreements must be taken into consideratfon in prioritfzing TIP projects. In additfon to the general consideratfons discussed above, there are five specific project categories through which the TIP is evaluated and analyzed. The categories include the following: Maintenance and Preservatfon of Existfng Infrastructure Corridor Projects Operatfons and Safety Non-Motorized Projects Other Programs These categories provide a useful analysis tool and represent goals developed through an evaluatfon of the City’s transportatfon program in response to input from citfzens and local officials and to state and federal legislatfon. 13 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) City of Renton | 2019 - 2024 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Taken as a whole, the five categories provide a framework for evaluatfng projects both individually and as part of a strategy that seeks to meet and balance the transportatfon needs of Renton during a tfme of in- creasing transportatfon demand, decreasing revenues, and growing environmental concerns. Although each project can be identffied with an important concern that allows it to be classified into one of the five categories, most projects are intended to address and are developed to be compatfble with multfple goals. Maintenance and Preservation of the Existing Infrastructure is a basic need that must be met by the program. The Mayor and City Council have emphasized the importance of sustaining strong programs in this project category and maintaining our current infrastructure. Therefore, more than half of the Transporta- tfon’s City Funds have historically been allocated under this category. The State Growth Management Act also requires jurisdictfons to assess and address the funding required to maintain their existfng transporta- tfon systems. The City of Renton owns and maintains 250 centerline miles of streets. Corridor Projects are oriented toward moving people through a balanced transportatfon system that in- volves multfple modes of transportatfon. Included are facilitfes that facilitate the movement of transit and carpools. The Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21), the State and Federal Clean Air legislatfon and the State Commute Trip Reductfon Act (CTR) have added momentum to regional efforts and placed requirements on local jurisdictfons such as Renton to promote these transportatfon elements. Operations and Safety projects and programs are developed through ongoing analyses of the transporta- tfon system and are directed mainly toward traffic engineering concerns such as safety and congestfon. Pro- jects are identffied not only by analysis of traffic counts, accident records and geometric data, but also through review and investfgatfon of citfzen complaints and requests. Non-Motorized Projects have been developed with major emphasis on addressing community quality of life issues by improving and/or protectfng residentfal livability while providing necessary transportatfon sys- tem improvements. Bicycle and pedestrian projects are included in this category. Other Programs involve planning of transportatfon improvements necessitated by new development and new transportatfon capital improvements. 14 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) City of Renton | 2019 - 2024 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Summary of Projects and Prioritization The prioritfzatfon of the TIP is influenced by the interconnectfon and/or interdependence among TIP projects and with projects by other City departments and by other jurisdictfons as well as the tfming of those transportatfon projects. Equally important to the prioritfzatfon below is the likelihood, the tfme frame, and the amount of outside funding that will be obtainable to finance transportatfon projects. The prioritfzatfon lists below are sorted by the category type of the projects. Priority TIP No. Project Title Community Planning Area Maintenance and Preservation of the Existing Infrastructure 1 1 Street Overlay Citywide 2 2 Arterial Rehabilitation Program Citywide 3 2.1 Renton Avenue S Resurfacing, S 130th St to Taylor Ave NW City Center 4 2.2 SW 43rd St Resurfacing, SR 167 to west City Limits Valley 5 15 Bronson Way N Bridge Repair, across Cedar River City Center 6 17 Houser Way N Bridge Repair, across Cedar River City Center 7 25 Williams Ave N Bridge Repair, across Cedar River City Center 8 9 Sidewalk Rehabilitation and Replacement Program Citywide 9 37 Nile Ave NE Bridge Repair, across May Creek East Plateau 10 10 Bridge Inspection & Repair Program Citywide 11 4 Roadway Safety and Guardrail Program Citywide 15 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) City of Renton | 2019 - 2024 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Priority TIP No. Project Title Community Planning Area Corridor Projects 1 26 Williams Ave S and Wells Ave S Conversion Project, S Grady Way to N 1st St City Center 2 20 Park Ave North Extension, Logan Ave N to Southport City Center 3 21 Rainier Ave S/N Corridor Improvements Phase 4, S 3rd St to NW 3rd Pl City Center 4 16 Duvall Ave NE Roadway Improvements, NE 7th St to Sunset Blvd NE Highlands & E. Plateau 5 24 South 2nd Street Conversion Project, Rainier Ave S to Main St City Center 6 19 NE Sunset Boulevard (SR 900) Corridor Improvements I-405 to east City Limits Highlands 7 23 116th Ave SE Improvements, Puget Drive SE to the south City Limits Benson 8 41 South 3rd Street Conversion Project, Rainier Ave S to Main St City Center 9 22 Renton Connector, S 2nd St to S 5th St City Center 10 44 South Lake Washington Transit Stop, vicinity of Southport Dr N and Garden Ave N City Center 11 27 Carr Road improvements, Lind Ave SW to 116th Ave SE Talbot & Benson 12 39 Renton Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Improvements, S Renton Village Pl extension to S Grady Way City Center 13 42 South 7th Street Corridor Improvements, Rainier Ave South to Talbot Road South City Center 14 31 Lake Washington Blvd N/ Southport Access Improvements, Park Ave N to Gene Coulon Park City Center 15 43 South Grady Way Multi-Modal Improvements, Talbot Rd South to Rainier Ave South City Center 16 38 Rainier Ave N Corridor Improvements Phase 5, NW 3rd Pl to City Limits City Center 17 29 Houser Way North Widening and Realignment, N 8th St to Lake Washington Blvd City Center 18 33 Logan Ave North Improvements, S 2nd St to Park Ave N City Center 19 36 NE 3rd Street / NE 4th Street Corridor Improvements, Sunset Blvd N to the east City Limits Highlands & E. Plateau 20 32 Lind Ave SW Roadway Widening, SW 16th St to SW 43rd St Valley 21 35 Monster Road SW/68th Ave S Roadway Improvements, Monster Rd Bridge and City Limits Valley 22 46 SW 27th Street/Strander Boulevard Connection Valley 16 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) City of Renton | 2019 - 2024 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Priority TIP No. Project Title Community Planning Area Operations and Safety 1 5 Intersection Safety & Mobility Program Citywide 2 6 Traffic Safety Program Citywide 3 8 Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Program Citywide 4 7 Traffic Operation Devices Program Citywide 5 34 Maple Valley Highway Barriers, west edge of Riverview Park Cedar River 6 47 Talbot Road S / S 177th St Signalization and Roadway Improvements, adjacent to Valley Medical Center Talbot Non-Motorized Projects 1 18 Lake Washington Loop Trail, south perimeter of the Renton Airport City Center 2 30 Lake to Sound (L2S) Trail, East-West Trail connecting Lake Washington to Puget Sound Valley & City Center 3 28 Houser Way S/N Non-Motorized Improvements, Mill Ave S to Bronson Way S City Center 4 11 Barrier-Free Transition Plan Implementation Citywide 5 3 Walkway Program Citywide 6 45 Sunset Area Green Connections, vicnity of Sunset Area Revitilzation Area Highlands Other Programs 1 13 Arterial Circulation Program Citywide 2 12 Project Development & Pre-Design Program Citywide 3 40 Transit Master Plan Citywide 4 14 1% for the Arts Program N/A 17 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) Section D Expenditures and Revenues 2019 – 2024 Transportation Improvement Program 18 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) City of Renton | 2019‐2024 Transportation Improvement Program TIP No. Project Title 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Six‐Year Period  Total 1 Street Overlay $1,090,000 $1,170,000 $2,070,000 $2,170,000 $2,260,000 $2,360,000 $11,120,000 2 Arterial Rehabilitation Program $1,540,000 $1,610,000 $1,680,000 $4,830,000 2.1 Renton Avenue S Resurfacing $550,000 $550,000 2.2 SW 43rd St Resurfacing $220,000 $1,820,000 $2,040,000 3 Walkway Program $200,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $1,450,000 4 Roadway Safety and Guardrail Program $25,000 $25,000 $30,000 $30,000 $35,000 $35,000 $180,000 5 Intersection Safety & Mobility Program $250,000 $200,000 $350,000 $350,000 $350,000 $350,000 $1,850,000 6 Traffic Safety Program $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $900,000 7 Traffic Operation Devices Program $120,000 $120,000 $120,000 $120,000 $120,000 $120,000 $720,000 8 Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Program $60,000 $60,000 $60,000 $60,000 $60,000 $60,000 $360,000 9 Sidewalk Rehabilitation and Replacement Program $100,000 $110,000 $110,000 $110,000 $110,000 $110,000 $650,000 10 Bridge Inspection & Repair Program $90,000 $50,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $540,000 11 Barrier‐Free Transition Plan Implementation $60,000 $80,000 $80,000 $80,000 $80,000 $80,000 $460,000 12 Project Development & Pre‐Design Program $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $900,000 13 Arterial Circulation Program $145,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $895,000 14 1% for the Arts Program $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $90,000 15 Bronson Way N Bridge Repair $420,000 $2,510,000 $2,930,000 16 Duvall Ave NE Roadway Improvements $1,512,139 $1,512,139 17 Houser Way N Bridge Repair $470,000 $2,531,900 $222,550 $3,224,450 18 Lake Washington Loop Trail $340,000 $1,425,000 $1,200,000 $950,000 $3,250,000 $7,165,000 19 NE Sunset Blvd (SR 900) Corridor Improvements $459,000 $2,750,000 $7,550,000 $6,850,000 $6,450,000 $6,250,000 $30,309,000 20 Park Ave North Extension $5,825,000 $625,000 $6,450,000 21 Rainier Ave S/N Corridor Improvements Phase 4 $1,500,000 $1,951,323 $8,800,000 $5,850,000 $150,000 $18,251,323 22 Renton Connector $278,700 $621,300 $3,963,000 $8,850,000 $13,713,000 23 116th Ave SE Improvements $1,600,000 $3,700,000 $2,600,000 $2,200,000 $10,100,000 24 South 2nd Street Conversion Project $100,000 $1,350,000 $7,800,000 $7,800,000 $17,050,000 25 Williams Ave N Bridge Repair $470,000 $2,740,450 $3,210,450 26 Williams Ave S and Wells Ave S Conversion Project $1,933,800 $6,348,269 $8,282,069 27 Carr Road improvements $50,000 $50,000 28 Houser Way Non‐Motorized Improvements $385,000 $836,000 $966,000 $2,187,000 29 Houser Way North Widening and Realignment $1,065,000 $1,560,000 $2,340,000 $4,965,000 30 Lake to Sound (L2S) Trail $2,800,000 $2,800,000 31 Lake Wash. Blvd N/Southport Access Improvements $2,000,000 $2,000,000 32 Lind Ave SW Roadway Widening $400,000 $1,650,000 $2,350,000 $4,400,000 33 Logan Ave North Improvements $1,240,000 $10,000,000 $11,240,000 34 Maple Valley Highway Barriers $299,035 $2,838,865 $3,137,900 35 Monster Road SW/68th Ave S  Improvements $50,000 $8,000,000 $8,050,000 36 NE 3rd Street / NE 4th Street Corridor Improvements $20,000 $20,000 $750,000 $4,190,000 $5,180,000 $3,200,000 $13,360,000 37 Nile Ave NE Bridge Repair $50,000 $200,000 $250,000 38 Rainier Ave N Corridor Improvements Phase 5 $100,000 $2,000,000 $2,100,000 39 Renton Bus  Rapid Transit (BRT) Improvements $3,195,000 $9,052,500 $9,052,500 $21,300,000 40 Renton Master Transit Plan $300,000 $200,000 $500,000 41 South 3rd Street Conversion Project $4,000,000 $6,500,000 $10,700,000 $21,200,000 42 S/SW 7th Street Corridor Improvements $200,000 $1,600,000 $10,364,000 $3,608,928 $15,772,928 43 South Grady Way Multi‐Modal Improvements $550,000 $1,760,000 $1,690,000 $4,000,000 44 South Lake Washington Transit Stop $4,350,000 $4,350,000 45 Sunset Area Green Connections $3,600,000 $10,700,000 $7,900,000 $22,200,000 46 SW 27th Street/Strander Boulevard Connection 47 Talbot Road S / S 177th St Improvements TOTAL EXPENDITURES $20,804,939 $23,801,942 $35,905,285 $57,030,165 $80,475,500 $75,577,428 $293,595,259 SUMMARY OF PROJECT EXPENDITURES 19 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) City of Renton | 2019‐2024 Transportation Improvement Program TIP No. Project Title 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Six‐Year Period  Total 1 Street Overlay $700,000 $710,000 $720,000 $730,000 $740,000 $750,000 $4,350,000 2 Arterial Rehabilitation Program 2.1 Renton Avenue S Resurfacing 2.2 SW 43rd St Resurfacing 3 Walkway Program 4 Roadway Safety and Guardrail Program 5 Intersection Safety & Mobility Program 6 Traffic Safety Program 7 Traffic Operation Devices Program 8 Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Program 9 Sidewalk Rehabilitation and Replacement Program 10 Bridge Inspection & Repair Program 11 Barrier‐Free Transition Plan Implementation 12 Project Development & Pre‐Design Program 13 Arterial Circulation Program 14 1% for the Arts Program 15 Bronson Way N Bridge Repair 16 Duvall Ave NE Roadway Improvements 17 Houser Way N Bridge Repair 18 Lake Washington Loop Trail 19 NE Sunset Boulevard (SR 900) Corridor Improvements 20 Park Ave North Extension 21 Rainier Ave S/N Corridor Improvements Phase 4 22 Renton Connector 23 116th Ave SE Improvements 24 South 2nd Street Conversion Project 25 Williams Ave N Bridge Repair 26 Williams Ave S and Wells Ave S Conversion Project 27 Carr Road improvements 28 Houser Way Non‐Motorized Improvements 29 Houser Way North Widening and Realignment 30 Lake to Sound (L2S) Trail 31 Lake Washington Blvd N/ Southport Access Improvements 32 Lind Ave SW Roadway Widening 33 Logan Ave North Improvements 34 Maple Valley Highway Attenuator 35 Monster Road SW/68th Ave S Roadway Improvements 36 NE 3rd Street / NE 4th Street Corridor Improvements 37 Nile Ave NE Bridge Repair 38 Rainier Ave N Corridor Improvements Phase 5 39 Renton Bus  Rapid Transit (BRT) Improvements 40 Renton Master Transit Plan 41 South 3rd Street Conversion Project 42 S/SW 7th Street Corridor Improvements 43 South Grady Way Multi‐Modal Improvements 44 South Lake Washington Transit Stop 45 Sunset Area Green Connections 46 SW 27th Street/Strander Boulevard Connection 47 Talbot Road S / S 177th St Improvements TOTAL VEHICLE FUEL TAX $700,000 $710,000 $720,000 $730,000 $740,000 $750,000 $4,350,000 RESOURCE: VEHICLE FUEL TAX 20 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) City of Renton | 2019‐2024 Transportation Improvement Program TIP No. Project Title 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Six‐Year Period  Total 1 Street Overlay $390,000 $460,000 $490,000 $530,000 $560,000 $600,000 $3,030,000 2 Arterial Rehabilitation Program $510,000 $530,000 $550,000 $1,590,000 2.1 Renton Avenue S Resurfacing $275,000 $275,000 2.2 SW 43rd St Resurfacing $220,000 $820,000 $1,040,000 3 Walkway Program $200,000 $250,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $850,000 4 Roadway Safety and Guardrail Program $25,000 $25,000 $30,000 $30,000 $35,000 $35,000 $180,000 5 Intersection Safety & Mobility Program 6 Traffic Safety Program $130,000 $70,000 $200,000 7 Traffic Operation Devices Program $120,000 $120,000 $120,000 $120,000 $120,000 $120,000 $720,000 8 Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Program 9 Sidewalk Rehabilitation and Replacement Program $100,000 $110,000 $110,000 $110,000 $110,000 $110,000 $650,000 10 Bridge Inspection & Repair Program $90,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $340,000 11 Barrier‐Free Transition Plan Implementation $60,000 $80,000 $140,000 12 Project Development & Pre‐Design Program $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $900,000 13 Arterial Circulation Program $145,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $895,000 14 1% for the Arts Program $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $90,000 15 Bronson Way N Bridge Repair 16 Duvall Ave NE Roadway Improvements $30,000 $30,000 17 Houser Way N Bridge Repair, 18 Lake Washington Loop Trail $75,000 $75,000 19 NE Sunset Boulevard (SR 900) Corridor Improvements $32,975 $32,975 20 Park Ave North Extension 21 Rainier Ave S/N Corridor Improvements Phase 4 $100,000 $450,000 $550,000 22 Renton Connector 23 116th Ave SE Improvements 24 South 2nd Street Conversion Project $100,000 $100,000 25 Williams Ave N Bridge Repair $122,550 $122,550 26 Williams Ave S and Wells Ave S Conversion Project 27 Carr Road improvements 28 Houser Way Non‐Motorized Improvements 29 Houser Way North Widening and Realignment 30 Lake to Sound (L2S) Trail 31 Lake Washington Blvd N/ Southport Access Improvements 32 Lind Ave SW Roadway Widening 33 Logan Ave North Improvements 34 Maple Valley Highway Barriers 35 Monster Road SW/68th Ave S Roadway Improvements 36 NE 3rd Street / NE 4th Street Corridor Improvements $20,000 $20,000 $40,000 37 Nile Ave NE Bridge Repair 38 Rainier Ave N Corridor Improvements Phase 5 39 Renton Bus  Rapid Transit (BRT) Improvements 40 Renton Master Transit Plan 41 South 3rd Street Conversion Project 42 S/SW 7th Street Corridor Improvements 43 South Grady Way Multi‐Modal Improvements 44 South Lake Washington Transit Stop 45 Sunset Area Green Connections 46 SW 27th Street/Strander Boulevard Connection 47 Talbot Road S / S 177th St Improvements TOTAL B & O Share $1,782,975 $2,017,550 $2,135,000 $2,215,000 $1,820,000 $1,880,000 $11,850,525 RESOURCE: BUSINESS LICENSE AND BUSINESS & OCCUPATION 21 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) City of Renton | 2019‐2024 Transportation Improvement Program TIP No. Project Title 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Six‐Year    Period Total 1 Street Overlay 2 Arterial Rehabilitation Program 2.1 Renton Avenue S Resurfacing 2.2 SW 43rd St Resurfacing $1,000,000 $1,000,000 3 Walkway Program 4 Roadway Safety and Guardrail Program 5 Intersection Safety & Mobility Program 6 Traffic Safety Program 7 Traffic Operation Devices Program 8 Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Program 9 Sidewalk Rehabilitation and Replacement Program 10 Bridge Inspection & Repair Program 11 Barrier‐Free Transition Plan Implementation 12 Project Development & Pre‐Design Program 13 Arterial Circulation Program 14 1% for the Arts Program 15 Bronson Way N Bridge Repair $420,000 $2,510,000 $2,930,000 16 Duvall Ave NE Roadway Improvements $1,049,039 $1,049,039 17 Houser Way N Bridge Repair $406,550 $2,531,900 $2,938,450 18 Lake Washington Loop Trail $340,000 $1,042,961 $1,382,961 19 NE Sunset Boulevard (SR 900) Corridor Improvements $426,025 $426,025 20 Park Ave North Extension 21 Rainier Ave S/N Corridor Improvements Phase 4 $1,192,475 $1,358,000 $5,800,000 $8,350,475 22 Renton Connector 23 116th Ave SE Improvements 24 South 2nd Street Conversion Project $1,200,000 $1,200,000 25 Williams Ave N Bridge Repair $406,550 $2,517,900 $2,924,450 26 Williams Ave S and Wells Ave S Conversion Project $1,453,800 $2,396,200 $3,850,000 27 Carr Road improvements 28 Houser Way Non‐Motorized Improvements 29 Houser Way North Widening and Realignment 30 Lake to Sound (L2S) Trail 31 Lake Washington Blvd N/ Southport Access Improvements 32 Lind Ave SW Roadway Widening 33 Logan Ave North Improvements 34 Maple Valley Highway Barriers 35 Monster Road SW/68th Ave S Roadway Improvements 36 NE 3rd Street / NE 4th Street Corridor Improvements 37 Nile Ave NE Bridge Repair 38 Rainier Ave N Corridor Improvements Phase 5 39 Renton Bus  Rapid Transit (BRT) Improvements 40 Renton Master Transit Plan 41 South 3rd Street Conversion Project 42 S/SW 7th Street Corridor Improvements 43 South Grady Way Multi‐Modal Improvements 44 South Lake Washington Transit Stop 45 Sunset Area Green Connections 46 SW 27th Street/Strander Boulevard Connection 47 Talbot Road S / S 177th St Improvements TOTAL GRANTS AWARDED $5,694,439 $12,356,961 $8,000,000 $26,051,400 RESOURCE: GRANTS AWARDED 22 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) City of Renton | 2019‐2024 Transportation Improvement Program TIP No. Project Title 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Six‐Year    Period Total 1 Street Overlay 2 Arterial Rehabilitation Program 2.1 Renton Avenue S Resurfacing 2.2 SW 43rd St Resurfacing 3 Walkway Program 4 Roadway Safety and Guardrail Program 5 Intersection Safety & Mobility Program $250,000 $200,000 $450,000 6 Traffic Safety Program $10,000 $80,000 $90,000 7 Traffic Operation Devices Program 8 Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Program $60,000 $60,000 $120,000 9 Sidewalk Rehabilitation and Replacement Program 10 Bridge Inspection & Repair Program 11 Barrier‐Free Transition Plan Implementation 12 Project Development & Pre‐Design Program 13 Arterial Circulation Program 14 1% for the Arts Program 15 Bronson Way N Bridge Repair 16 Duvall Ave NE Roadway Improvements $322,475 $322,475 17 Houser Way N Bridge Repair 18 Lake Washington Loop Trail $307,039 $307,039 19 NE Sunset Boulevard (SR 900) Corridor Improvements 20 Park Ave North Extension 21 Rainier Ave S/N Corridor Improvements Phase 4 $307,525 $593,323 $700,000 $945,000 $150,000 $2,695,848 22 Renton Connector 23 116th Ave SE Improvements 24 South 2nd Street Conversion Project 25 Williams Ave N Bridge Repair 26 Williams Ave S and Wells Ave S Conversion Project 27 Carr Road improvements $50,000 $50,000 28 Houser Way Non‐Motorized Improvements 29 Houser Way North Widening and Realignment 30 Lake to Sound (L2S) Trail 31 Lake Washington Blvd N/ Southport Access Improvements 32 Lind Ave SW Roadway Widening 33 Logan Ave North Improvements 34 Maple Valley Highway Barriers 35 Monster Road SW/68th Ave S Roadway Improvements 36 NE 3rd Street / NE 4th Street Corridor Improvements 37 Nile Ave NE Bridge Repair 38 Rainier Ave N Corridor Improvements Phase 5 39 Renton Bus  Rapid Transit (BRT) Improvements 40 Renton Master Transit Plan 41 South 3rd Street Conversion Project 42 S/SW 7th Street Corridor Improvements 43 South Grady Way Multi‐Modal Improvements 44 South Lake Washington Transit Stop 45 Sunset Area Green Connections 46 SW 27th Street/Strander Boulevard Connection 47 Talbot Road S / S 177th St Improvements TOTAL MITIGATION $1,000,000 $1,240,362 $700,000 $945,000 $150,000 $4,035,362 RESOURCE: MITIGATION (IMPACT FEES) 23 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) City of Renton | 2019‐2024 Transportation Improvement Program TIP No. Project Title 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Six‐Year    Period Total 1 Street Overlay 2 Arterial Rehabilitation Program 2.1 Renton Avenue S Resurfacing 2.2 SW 43rd St Resurfacing 3 Walkway Program 4 Roadway Safety and Guardrail Program 5 Intersection Safety & Mobility Program 6 Traffic Safety Program 7 Traffic Operation Devices Program 8 Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Program 9 Sidewalk Rehabilitation and Replacement Program 10 Bridge Inspection & Repair Program 11 Barrier‐Free Transition Plan Implementation 12 Project Development & Pre‐Design Program 13 Arterial Circulation Program 14 1% for the Arts Program 15 Bronson Way N Bridge Repair 16 Duvall Ave NE Roadway Improvements 17 Houser Way N Bridge Repair 18 Lake Washington Loop Trail 19 NE Sunset Boulevard (SR 900) Corridor Improvements 20 Park Ave North Extension $5,825,000 $625,000 $6,450,000 21 Rainier Ave S/N Corridor Improvements Phase 4 $2,100,000 $4,455,000 $6,555,000 22 Renton Connector 23 116th Ave SE Improvements 24 South 2nd Street Conversion Project 25 Williams Ave N Bridge Repair 26 Williams Ave S and Wells Ave S Conversion Project 27 Carr Road improvements 28 Houser Way Non‐Motorized Improvements 29 Houser Way North Widening and Realignment 30 Lake to Sound (L2S) Trail $2,800,000 $2,800,000 31 Lake Washington Blvd N/ Southport Access Improvements $2,000,000 $2,000,000 32 Lind Ave SW Roadway Widening 33 Logan Ave North Improvements 34 Maple Valley Highway Barriers 35 Monster Road SW/68th Ave S Roadway Improvements 36 NE 3rd Street / NE 4th Street Corridor Improvements 37 Nile Ave NE Bridge Repair 38 Rainier Ave N Corridor Improvements Phase 5 39 Renton Bus  Rapid Transit (BRT) Improvements 40 Renton Master Transit Plan 41 South 3rd Street Conversion Project 42 S/SW 7th Street Corridor Improvements 43 South Grady Way Multi‐Modal Improvements 44 South Lake Washington Transit Stop 45 Sunset Area Green Connections 46 SW 27th Street/Strander Boulevard Connection 47 Talbot Road S / S 177th St Improvements TOTAL OTHER SOURCES $10,625,000 $625,000 $2,100,000 $4,455,000 $17,805,000 RESOURCE: OTHER (Developer Contributions, Other Agencies, etc) 24 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) Section E Project Descriptions 2019 – 2024 Transportation Improvement Program 25 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019 - 2024 TIP No. 1 Project Title:Street Overlay Community Planning Area:Citywide Fund: Functional Classification:Local and Collector Project: Project Length:various Contact: Project Description: Justification: Status: Changes: Funded:Unfunded: Spent 2017 2018 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Expenditures: Planning - - - - - - - - - - Preliminary Engineering 28,000 - 4,000 24,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 R-O-W (includes Admin)- - - - - - - - - - Construction 14,161,226 1,671,226 1,730,000 10,760,000 1,030,000 1,110,000 2,010,000 2,110,000 2,200,000 2,300,000 Construction Services 455,947 63,947 56,000 336,000 56,000 56,000 56,000 56,000 56,000 56,000 Post Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenses 14,645,173 1,735,173 1,790,000 11,120,000 1,090,000 1,170,000 2,070,000 2,170,000 2,260,000 2,360,000 Source of Fund: Vehicle Fuel Tax 5,680,000 660,000 670,000 4,350,000 700,000 710,000 720,000 730,000 740,000 750,000 Business & Occupation Share 3,395,173 75,173 290,000 3,030,000 390,000 460,000 490,000 530,000 560,000 600,000 Fund Balance 30,000 - 30,000 - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (1)- - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (2)- - - - - - - - - - Mitigation 800,000 - 800,000 - - - - - - - Bonds / LID's Formed - - - - - - - - - - Other (Gen Fund Transfer)1,000,000 1,000,000 - - - - - - - - Other (2)- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Undetermined 3,740,000 - - 3,740,000 - - 860,000 910,000 960,000 1,010,000 Total Sources 14,645,173 1,735,173 1,790,000 11,120,000 1,090,000 1,170,000 2,070,000 2,170,000 2,260,000 2,360,000 122108 317 Street Overlay Project Expenditures & Resources Programmed Michelle Faltaous 425-430-7301 Annual program for repairing and resurfacing existing roadways. Installation of ADA compliant curb ramps has been incorporated into the Street Overlay Program in accordance with federal requirements. This program funds overlays on neighborhood streets and collector streets while the Arterial Rehabilitation Program (TIP No. 2) funds principal and minor arterials. This program allocates $100K/yr for the overlay of alleyways. Asphalt concrete pavement (ACP) overlay and slurry seal of streets provide for improved driving surface and are highly cost-effective ways of avoiding expensive repairs and reconstruction. The Pavement Management System and biennial survey of roadway conditions greatly improve the efficiency of the Overlay Program. The 2016 "Pavement Management Program State of the Streets Report" rated the average Pavement Condition Index (PCI) as 68. According to the report, $78M will need to be invested in pavement rehabilitation in the next 10 years to bring the PCI to 70 and maintain it at that level. The City will be conducting an updated street survey through the summer of 2018. Due to increasing ADA regulations starting in 2019, the annual design and contract award will be prepared by a Consultant. The ADA required curb ramps may be split out into its own contract. 10,905,173 3,740,000 Programmed Pre-2019 Six-Year Program 26 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019 - 2024 TIP No. 2 Project Title:Arterial Rehabilitation Program Community Planning Area:Citywide Fund: Functional Classification:Principal and Minor Arterial Project: Project Length:various Contact: Project Description: Justification: Status: Changes: Funded:Unfunded: Spent 2017 2018 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Expenditures: Planning - - - - - - - - - - Preliminary Engineering - - - - - - - - - - R-O-W (includes Admin)- - - - - - - - - - Construction 3,240,000 - - 3,240,000 - - - 1,030,000 1,080,000 1,130,000 Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Post Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Other (City Match)1,590,000 - - 1,590,000 - - - 510,000 530,000 550,000 Total Expenses 4,830,000 - - 4,830,000 - - - 1,540,000 1,610,000 1,680,000 Resources: Vehicle Fuel Tax - - - - - - - - - - Business & Occupation Share 1,590,000 - - 1,590,000 - - - 510,000 530,000 550,000 Fund Balance - - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (1)- - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (2)- - - - - - - - - - Mitigation - - - - - - - - - - Bonds / LID's Formed - - - - - - - - - - Other (1)- - - - - - - - - - Other (2)- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Undetermined 3,240,000 - - 3,240,000 - - - 1,030,000 1,080,000 1,130,000 Total Sources 4,830,000 - - 4,830,000 - - - 1,540,000 1,610,000 1,680,000 Arterial Rehabilitation Program 1,590,000 3,240,000 Project Expenditures & Resources Programmed Programmed Pre-2019 Six-Year Program The 2016 "Pavement Management Program State of the Streets Report" rated the average Pavement Condition Index (PCI) as 68. According to the report, $78M will need to ne invested in pavement rehabilitation in the next 10 years to bring the PCI to 70 and maintain it at that level. The City was awarded a $1,020,700 STP grant for the Renton Ave Extension and $1,000,000 was awarded to SW 43rd St. Expenditures and Funds for years 2019, 2020, & 2021 are reflected in individual TIP project sheets for Renton Ave Resurfacing (TIP #2.1) and SW 43rd Preservation (TIP #2.2). 317 Michelle Faltaous 425-430-7301 This program provides for the rehabilitation of principal and minor arterial streets. Installation of ADA-compliant curb ramps has been incorporated into the annual Arterial Rehabilitation and Overlay programs according to new federal requirements. This program will provide funding for the City match for larger federally funded projects. The Overlay Program (TIP #1) concentrates to a great degree on maintaining residential streets, where relatively small traffic volumes and less truck and bus traffic make standard asphalt overlays a long term means of maintenance. Arterial streets can often deteriorate rather quickly and often require more costly rehabilitation measures and/or costly temporary repairs to avoid more extensive deterioration. 122186 27 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019 - 2024 TIP No. 2.1 Project Title:Arterial Rehabilitation - Renton Ave S Resurfacing Community Planning Area:West Hill Fund: Functional Classification:Minor Arterial Project: Project Length:0.60 mi Contact: Project Description: Justification: Status: Changes: Funded:Unfunded: Pre-2018 2018 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Expenditures: Planning - - - - - - - - - - Preliminary Engineering 78,310 78,310 - - - - - - - - R-O-W (includes Admin)- - - - - - - - - - Construction 1,875,390 - 1,325,390 550,000 550,000 - - - - - Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Post Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenses 1,953,700 78,310 1,325,390 550,000 550,000 - - - - - Resources: Vehicle Fuel Tax - - - - - - - - - - Business & Occupation Share 505,655 78,310 152,345 275,000 275,000 - - - - - Fund Balance 427,345 - 152,345 275,000 275,000 - - - - - Grants Awarded (STP)1,020,700 - 1,020,700 - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (2)- - - - - - - - - - Mitigation - - - - - - - - - - Bonds / LID's Formed - - - - - - - - - - Other (1)- - - - - - - - - - Other (2)- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Undetermined - - - - - - - - - - Total Sources 1,953,700 78,310 1,325,390 550,000 550,000 - - - - - Arterial Rehabilitation - Renton Ave S Resurfacing 1,953,700 - Project Expenditures & Resources Programmed Programmed Pre-2019 Six-Year Program The construction of this project is being coordinated with development construction along Renton Ave S to minimize construction impacts and cost. 317 Hebe Bernardo 425-430-7232 This project will resurface 0.60 miles of Renton Ave S from S 130th St (west City Limits) to Hardie Ave SW and upgrade ADA ramps to current standards. The roadway is classified as a T-2 truck route carrying 5.8 million tones of freight annually. The overall condition of the pavement will be improved and the project will extend the pavement life (12-15 years). Renton Ave S is also an alternate route to SR-900, connecting Renton to the Skyway area and South Seattle. The City was awarded a $1,020,700 STP grant for Pavement Preservation in 2016. Design is underway and will be completed in the Fall of 2018. Construction to be completed in 2019. 122185 28 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019 - 2024 TIP No. 2.2 Project Title:Arterial Rehabilitation - SW 43rd St Pavement Preservation Community Planning Area:Valley Fund: Functional Classification:Principal Arterial Project: Project Length:1.17 mi Contact: Project Description: Justification: Status: Changes: Funded:Unfunded: Pre-2018 2018 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Expenditures: Planning - - - - - - - - - - Preliminary Engineering 220,000 - - 220,000 - 220,000 - - - - R-O-W (includes Admin)- - - - - - - - - - Construction 1,820,000 - - 1,820,000 - - 1,820,000 - - - Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Post Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenses 2,040,000 - - 2,040,000 - 220,000 1,820,000 - - - Resources: Vehicle Fuel Tax - - - - - - - - - - Business & Occupation Share 1,040,000 - - 1,040,000 - 220,000 820,000 - - - Fund Balance - - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (STP Preservation)1,000,000 - - 1,000,000 - - 1,000,000 - - - Grants Awarded (2)- - - - - - - - - - Mitigation - - - - - - - - - - Bonds / LID's Formed - - - - - - - - - - Other (1)- - - - - - - - - - Other (2)- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Undetermined - - - - - - - - Total Sources 2,040,000 - - 2,040,000 - 220,000 1,820,000 - - - 2,040,000 - Project Expenditures & Resources Programmed Programmed Pre-2019 Six-Year Program Arterial Rehabilitation - SW 43rd St Pavement Preservation 317 NEW Michelle Faltaous 425-430-7301 This project will resurface the roadway from the western city limits to the SR 167 Ramps, except where there are existing concrete panels. This project will also upgrade all intersection ramps to current ADA standards as well as install and replace all delineation to City of Renton standards. Also included in this project are the adjustment or evaluation for replacement of existing features affected by resurfacing such as monuments, catch basins, or drainage grates. This principal arterial and T-1 truck route is a major east-west corridor that serves and directly connects to the Sounder Station. SW 43rd St connects directly to SR 167 and is used as a main access to Valley Medical Center, IKEA, and other major employment centers. Resurfacing this roadway will improve the overall condition of the pavement and the project will extend the pavement life (12-15 years) of this key east-west South County corridor. New project. The City was awarded a $1,000,000 STP grant for Pavement Preservation in 2018. 29 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019 - 2024 TIP No. 3 Project Title:Walkway Program Community Planning Area:Citywide Fund: Functional Classification:various Project: Project Length:various Contact: Project Description: Justification: Status: Changes: Funded:Unfunded: Spent 2017 2018 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Expenditures: Planning 32,000 - 2,000 30,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 Preliminary Engineering 150,000 - - 150,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 R-O-W (includes Admin)- - - - - - - - - - Construction 1,231,088 73,088 8,000 1,150,000 150,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 Construction Services 120,000 - - 120,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 Post Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenses 1,533,088 73,088 10,000 1,450,000 200,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 Resources: Vehicle Fuel Tax - - - - - - - - - - Business & Occupation Share 933,088 73,088 10,000 850,000 200,000 250,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 Fund Balance - - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (1)- - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (2)- - - - - - - - - - Mitigation - - - - - - - - - - Bonds / LID's Formed - - - - - - - - - - Other (1)- - - - - - - - - - Other (2)- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Undetermined 600,000 - - 600,000 - - 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 Total Sources 1,533,088 73,088 10,000 1,450,000 200,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 933,088 600,000 Project Expenditures & Resources Programmed Programmed Pre-2019 Six-Year Program Walkway Program With the cost of design and construction of sidewalk projects exceeding the annual funding for this program, this program was used as match funding for grant applications in 2018. 317 120009 Hebe Bernardo 425-430-7232 This program provides for the design and construction of non-motorized transportation facilities for pedestrians as well as provide City match funding for larger federal and state funded projects. Projects are identified and prioritized using criteria from the Comprehensive Citywide Walkway Study, Council direction, and through coordination with the City's Neighborhood Program. Providing safe and convenient non-motorized facilities is an integral part of a complete transportation network. Specific improvements will respond to the needs of school children, the aged and persons with disabilities, and support increased use of transit. The Comprehensive Citywide Walkway Study was completed in 2009 and is being used to select projects that move into the design and construction phases. 30 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019 - 2024 TIP No. 4 Project Title:Roadway Safety and Guardrail Program Community Planning Area:Citywide Fund: Functional Classification:various Project: Project Length:various Contact: Project Description: Justification: Status: Changes: Funded:Unfunded: Spent 2017 2018 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Expenditures: Planning - - - - - - - - - - Preliminary Engineering 21,000 - 3,000 18,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 R-O-W (includes Admin)- - - - - - - - - - Construction 175,000 714 24,286 150,000 20,000 20,000 25,000 25,000 30,000 30,000 Construction Services 14,000 - 2,000 12,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 Post Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenses 210,000 714 29,286 180,000 25,000 25,000 30,000 30,000 35,000 35,000 Resources: Vehicle Fuel Tax - - - - - - - - - - Business & Occupation Share 210,000 714 29,286 180,000 25,000 25,000 30,000 30,000 35,000 35,000 Fund Balance - - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (1)- - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (2)- - - - - - - - - - Mitigation - - - - - - - - - - Bonds / LID's Formed - - - - - - - - - - Other (1)- - - - - - - - - - Other (2)- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Undetermined - - - - - - - - - - Total Sources 210,000 714 29,286 180,000 25,000 25,000 30,000 30,000 35,000 35,000 210,000 - Project Expenditures & Resources Programmed Programmed Pre-2019 Six-Year Program Roadway Safety and Guardrail Program 317 120110 Chris Barnes 425-430-7220 This program will provide guardrail improvements each year and improve the safety of the roadside environment. This program will implement roadside safety improvements including barrier systems and hazardous object removal. This program will develop a policy and standardized criteria for barriers and selection of projects. 31 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019 - 2024 TIP No. 5 Project Title:Intersection Safety & Mobility Program Community Planning Area:Citywide Fund: Functional Classification:various Project: Project Length:N/A Contact: Project Description: Justification: Status: Changes: Funded:Unfunded: Spent 2017 2018 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Expenditures: Planning - - - - - - - - - - Preliminary Engineering 314,000 - 44,000 270,000 45,000 45,000 45,000 45,000 45,000 45,000 R-O-W (includes Admin)- - - - - - - - - - Construction 1,380,000 99,652 30,348 1,250,000 150,000 100,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 Construction Services 356,000 - 26,000 330,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 Post Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenses 2,050,000 99,652 100,348 1,850,000 250,000 200,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 Resources: Vehicle Fuel Tax - - - - - - - - - - Business & Occupation Share 200,000 99,652 100,348 - - - - - - - Fund Balance - - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (1)- - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (2)- - - - - - - - - - Mitigation 450,000 - - 450,000 250,000 200,000 - - - - Bonds / LID's Formed - - - - - - - - - - Other (1)- - - - - - - - - - Other (2)- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Undetermined 1,400,000 - - 1,400,000 - - 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 Total Sources 2,050,000 99,652 100,348 1,850,000 250,000 200,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 650,000 1,400,000 Project Expenditures & Resources Programmed Programmed Pre-2019 Six-Year Program Intersection Safety & Mobility Program 317 122601 Chris Barnes 425-430-7220 This program will install new traffic signals, software systems to improve traffic signal timing operations, central signal system upgrades or make improvements to existing signals identified by the Transportation Systems' Traffic Signal Priority List. The Priority List is determined by citizen concerns, intersection safety, mobility needs, and intersections that meet MUTCD traffic signal warrants. Historically, one traffic signal is designed and constructed every two-three years to meet safety and mobility needs. This program budgets for projects needed to meet increasing demand, and the need for signalized traffic control. Elements used to prioritize project intersections may include vehicular approach volumes, accident analysis, signal-warrant analysis, and pedestrian volume. Preliminary engineering and design will begin for SW 41st St. and Oakesdale Ave SW in 2018 and construction completed in 2020. 32 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019 - 2024 TIP No. 6 Project Title:Traffic Safety Program Community Planning Area:Citywide Fund: Functional Classification:various Project: Project Length:various Contact: Project Description: Justification: Status: Changes: Funded:Unfunded: Spent 2017 2018 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Expenditures: Planning 34,905 34,905 - - - - - - - - Preliminary Engineering 139,000 - 19,000 120,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 R-O-W (includes Admin)- - - - - - - - - - Construction 948,904 160,904 68,000 720,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 Construction Services 63,000 - 3,000 60,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 Post Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Other (Trans to 503)11,000 11,000 - - - - - - - - Total Expenses 1,196,809 206,809 90,000 900,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 Resources: Vehicle Fuel Tax - - - - - - - - - - Business & Occupation Share 345,000 55,000 90,000 200,000 130,000 70,000 - - - - Fund Balance 113,259 103,259 - 10,000 10,000 - - - - - Grants Awarded (1)- - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (2)- - - - - - - - - - Mitigation 95,000 5,000 - 90,000 10,000 80,000 - - - - Bonds / LID's Formed - - - - - - - - - - Other (Landing Reimb)43,550 43,550 - - - - - - - - Other (2)- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Undetermined 600,000 - - 600,000 - - 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 Total Sources 1,196,809 206,809 90,000 900,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 596,809 600,000 Project Expenditures & Resources Programmed Programmed Pre-2019 Six-Year Program Traffic Safety Program 317 122115 Chris Barnes 425-430-7220 This ongoing yearly program provides funding for special small-scale traffic safety improvements that are identified and require materials, labor or equipment. This program includes converting school zone signs to electronic operation, installation of pedestrian safety traffic signals including Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFB), and Hawk hybrid beacon signals, bulbouts and radar speed signs for traffic calming. Historically, this level of traffic safety improvements are required on an annual basis. This program budgets for safety projects to address these needs. Projects are typically identified through citizen concerns, analysis of accident records or observation by City Traffic Operations personnel. School speed zone flashing beacons and speed radar signs will be installed for traffic calming. 33 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019 - 2024 TIP No. 7 Project Title:Traffic Operation Devices Program Community Planning Area:Citywide Fund: Functional Classification:N/A Project: Project Length:N/A Contact: Project Description: Justification: Status: Changes: Funded:Unfunded: Spent 2017 2018 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Expenditures: Planning - - - - - - - - - - Preliminary Engineering - - - - - - - - - - R-O-W (includes Admin)- - - - - - - - - - Construction 999,000 135,763 143,237 720,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Post Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenses 999,000 135,763 143,237 720,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 Resources: Vehicle Fuel Tax - - - - - - - - - - Business & Occupation Share 902,000 62,000 120,000 720,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 Fund Balance 97,000 73,763 23,237 - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (1)- - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (2)- - - - - - - - - - Mitigation - - - - - - - - - - Bonds / LID's Formed - - - - - - - - - - Other (1)- - - - - - - - - - Other (2)- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Undetermined - - - - - - - - - - Total Sources 999,000 135,763 143,237 720,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 999,000 - Project Expenditures & Resources Programmed Programmed Pre-2019 Six-Year Program Traffic Operation Devices Program 317 122904 Eric Cutshall 425-430-7423 The City of Renton owns and operates 135 traffic signals, 4800+ street lights, 700+ lane miles and 12,000+ signs. This program replaces failed video detection cameras, signal heads, signal cabinets, UPS batteries and LED indications as needed based on the findings from yearly maintenance programs. This program also provides for new/replacement of signs that are obsolete, faded or that do not meet retro reflectivity requirements, replacement of damaged luminaire and signal poles. This program also replaces pavement markings and failed C-curbing with a more maintenance friendly composite curbing. Most of Renton's traffic signals and UPS systems require extensive maintenance and replacement programs to keep traffic signals operating as efficiently as possible. Signage requires a maintenance program to maintain retro reflectivity requirements. Pavement deterioration has increased the number of failed loops throughout the City and as loops fail they are replaced with video detection cameras and associated equipment. Ongoing based on findings of yearly maintenance programs and engineering work orders. 34 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019 - 2024 TIP No. 8 Project Title:Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Program Community Planning Area:Citywide Fund: Functional Classification:N/A Project: Project Length:N/A Contact: Project Description: Justification: Status: Changes: Funded:Unfunded: Spent 2017 2018 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Expenditures: Planning - - - - - - - - - - Preliminary Engineering 65,000 - 5,000 60,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 R-O-W (includes Admin)- - - - - - - - - - Construction 300,000 38,015 21,985 240,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 Construction Services 65,000 - 5,000 60,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 Post Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenses 430,000 38,015 31,985 360,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 Resources: Vehicle Fuel Tax - - - - - - - - - - Business & Occupation Share 60,000 30,000 30,000 - - - - - - - Fund Balance 10,000 8,015 1,985 - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (1)- - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (2)- - - - - - - - - - Mitigation 120,000 - - 120,000 60,000 60,000 - - - - Bonds / LID's Formed - - - - - - - - - - Other (1)- - - - - - - - - - Other (2)- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Undetermined 240,000 - - 240,000 - - 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 Total Sources 430,000 38,015 31,985 360,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 190,000 240,000 Project Expenditures & Resources Programmed Programmed Pre-2019 Six-Year Program Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Program An additional $30,000/yr has been allocated to this program. 317 122162 Eric Cutshall 425-430-7423 Provides for improvements to the operational efficiency of the roadway system, including development and implementation of signal coordination programs, Adaptive Signal Control, installation of fiber communication, PTZ cameras, Radar signs, LED signs, transit signal priority, Intelligent Traffic Systems (ITS) Master Plan and signal improvements such as protective/permissive phasing. Improving the capacity and efficiency of the existing roadway system is a cost effective element of the transportation program. Installing fiber communication creates higher bandwidths so PTZ cameras can be installed. Fiber optic communication provides the Traffic Management Center with real time traffic conditions, adaptive signal control and ability to view video detection systems. The goal is to have fiber installed to all 135 traffic signals. This program is currently in the process of installing fiber communications and expanding adaptive signal control which affects 70% of the City's traffic signals. 35 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019 - 2024 TIP No. 9 Project Title:Sidewalk Rehabilitation and Replacement Program Community Planning Area:Citywide Fund: Functional Classification:various Project: Project Length:N/A Contact: Project Description: Justification: Status: Changes: Funded:Unfunded: Spent 2017 2018 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Expenditures: Planning 204 204 - - - - - - - - Preliminary Engineering 61,822 61,822 - - - - - - - - R-O-W (includes Admin)- - - - - - - - - - Construction 1,498,537 361,679 486,858 650,000 100,000 110,000 110,000 110,000 110,000 110,000 Construction Services 11,467 11,467 - - - - - - - - Post Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenses 1,572,030 435,172 486,858 650,000 100,000 110,000 110,000 110,000 110,000 110,000 Resources: Vehicle Fuel Tax - - - - - - - - - - Business & Occupation Share 850,000 100,000 100,000 650,000 100,000 110,000 110,000 110,000 110,000 110,000 Fund Balance 722,030 335,172 386,858 - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (1)- - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (2)- - - - - - - - - - Mitigation - - - - - - - - - - Bonds / LID's Formed - - - - - - - - - - Other (1)- - - - - - - - - - Other (2)- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Undetermined - - - - - - - - - - Total Sources 1,572,030 435,172 486,858 650,000 100,000 110,000 110,000 110,000 110,000 110,000 1,572,030 - Project Expenditures & Resources Programmed Programmed Pre-2019 Six-Year Program Sidewalk Rehabilitation and Replacement Program The 2019 program funding will be used to repair the sidewalk along Rainier Ave between S 2nd St and Tobin. 317 122801 Michelle Faltaous 425-430-2270 This program provides for the replacement of existing curb and gutter, sidewalks, and curb ramps where such facilities have deteriorated or have been damaged. In order to address deficiencies and provide safe and convenient non-motorized facilities for pedestrians in neighborhoods, the City must have a program to analyze, repair or replace damaged or deteriorated curb and gutter, sidewalks, and curb ramps. There are some places where curb ramps do not exist or are not to current ADA standards and they will be upgraded through this program. Staff continue to receive location requests from the public and other staff for review and prioritization. 36 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019 - 2024 TIP No. 10 Project Title:Bridge Inspection & Repair Program Community Planning Area:Citywide Fund: Functional Classification:N/A Project: Project Length:N/A Contact: Project Description: Justification: Status: Changes: Funded:Unfunded: Spent 2017 2018 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Expenditures: Planning - - - - - - - - - - Preliminary Engineering 385,056 88,056 87,000 210,000 30,000 20,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 R-O-W (includes Admin)- - - - - - - - - - Construction 162,000 - 15,000 147,000 20,000 17,000 20,000 35,000 20,000 35,000 Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Post Construction Services 218,000 - 35,000 183,000 40,000 13,000 40,000 25,000 40,000 25,000 Other - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenses 765,056 88,056 137,000 540,000 90,000 50,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 Resources: Vehicle Fuel Tax - - - - - - - - - - Business & Occupation Share 450,000 50,000 60,000 340,000 90,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 Fund Balance 115,056 38,056 77,000 - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (FEMA)- - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (State Share)- - - - - - - - - - Mitigation - - - - - - - - - - Bonds / LID's Formed - - - - - - - - - - Other (1)- - - - - - - - - - Other (2)- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Undetermined 200,000 - - 200,000 - - 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 Total Sources 765,056 88,056 137,000 540,000 90,000 50,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 565,056 200,000 Project Expenditures & Resources Programmed Programmed Pre-2019 Six-Year Program Bridge Inspection & Repair Program 317 120106 Derek Akesson 425-430-7337 The Transportation Division inspects 27 bridge structures owned by the City of Renton, every two years. The purpose of these inspections is to monitor the condition of bridge elements in order to identify structural deficiencies in need of repair. The goals of the program are to keep the bridges open and safe for public use, preserve bridge infrastructure by maximizing the useful lie through active maintenance, retrofitting and rehabilitation, and replace bridges with reliable new structures when repair or rehabilitation is not feasible. Per Federal Regulations, the City is required to perform a bridge condition inspection for all bridges, located in the public right-of-way and open for public use, that span 20-ft or more. WSDOT recommends condition inspections be performed on all short span and pedestrian bridges, located with the public right-of-way and open for public use. In order to qualify for Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) bridge funding, the City must stay in compliance with the Federal Regulations. Funds shown under construction are for minor repairs to bridge structures. 37 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019 - 2024 TIP No. 11 Project Title:Barrier Free Transition Plan Implementation Community Planning Area:Citywide Fund: Functional Classification:N/A Project: Project Length:N/A Contact: Project Description: Justification: Status: Changes: Funded:Unfunded: Spent 2017 2018 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Expenditures: Planning 65,000 - 5,000 60,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 Preliminary Engineering - - - - - - - - - - R-O-W (includes Admin)- - - - - - - - - - Construction 416,000 5,171 46,829 364,000 44,000 64,000 64,000 64,000 64,000 64,000 Construction Services 39,000 - 3,000 36,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 Post Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenses 520,000 5,171 54,829 460,000 60,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 Resources: Vehicle Fuel Tax - - - - - - - - - - Business & Occupation Share 175,171 5,171 30,000 140,000 60,000 80,000 - - - - Fund Balance 24,829 - 24,829 - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (1)- - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (2)- - - - - - - - - - Mitigation - - - - - - - - - - Bonds / LID's Formed - - - - - - - - - - Other (1)- - - - - - - - - - Other (2)- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Undetermined 320,000 - - 320,000 - - 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 Total Sources 520,000 5,171 54,829 460,000 60,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 200,000 320,000 Project Expenditures & Resources Programmed Programmed Pre-2019 Six-Year Program Barrier Free Transition Plan Implementation An additional $30,000 for 2019 and $40,000/yr for years 2020-2024 have been allocated to this program. 317 122705 Dan Hasty 425-430-7217 This program provides funding for designing and building features on an "as needed" basis in response to individual requests to improve access for individuals with special needs. A project list has been developed based upon sites identified in the Transition Plan section of the City of Renton Comprehensive Citywide Sidewalk Study. This program implements projects that support the City's effort to transition pedestrian facilities within the right-of-way into conformity with provisions contained in the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Guidelines. The ADA Transition Plan has been adopted on May 18 2015. A programmatic approach is required to ensure compliance with federal law. Maintenance of the GIS database to continue Self Evaluation of existing curb ramps, newly constructed curb ramps, annexations, capital improvement projects, and/or physical condition changes is ongoing. 38 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019 - 2024 TIP No. 12 Project Title:Project Development & Pre-Design Program Community Planning Area:Citywide Fund: Functional Classification:N/A Project: Project Length:N/A Contact: Project Description: Justification: Status: Changes: Funded:Unfunded: Spent 2017 2018 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Expenditures: Planning 766,795 77,233 89,562 600,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 Preliminary Engineering 343,204 13,204 30,000 300,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 R-O-W (includes Admin)- - - - - - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Post Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenses 1,110,000 90,438 119,562 900,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 Resources: Vehicle Fuel Tax - - - - - - - - - - Business & Occupation Share 1,110,000 90,438 119,562 900,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 Fund Balance - - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (1)- - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (2)- - - - - - - - - - Mitigation - - - - - - - - - - Bonds / LID's Formed - - - - - - - - - - Other (1)- - - - - - - - - - Other (2)- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Undetermined - - - - - - - - - - Total Sources 1,110,000 90,438 119,562 900,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 1,110,000 - Project Expenditures & Resources Programmed Programmed Pre-2019 Six-Year Program Project Development & Pre-Design Program The Trails and Bicycle Master Plan Update is anticipated to be completed in the end of 2018. Once the Trails and Bicycle Master Plan is complete, staff will work on updating the Comprehensive Citywide Walkway Study (last updated in 2009). 317 122150 Vangie Garcia 425-430-7319 Perform critical activities needed for the development of transportation projects that will best serve the needs of Renton and be eligible for grant applications. Also provides for the monitoring of active grant projects for compliance with State and Federal laws, regulations and specifications. Other critical activities to develop future capital improvement projects consist of but are not limited to project scoping, cost estimates, pre-design, interlocal agreements, analyses of existing and projected transportation problems, local and regional mobility goals and deficiency analysis. This program includes small studies funding. Transportation, in partnership with Parks Division is updating the Trail and Bicycle Master Plan. 39 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019 - 2024 TIP No. 13 Project Title:Arterial Circulation Program Community Planning Area:Citywide Fund: Functional Classification:N/A Project: Project Length:N/A Contact: Project Description: Justification: Status: Changes: Funded:Unfunded: Spent 2017 2018 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Expenditures: Planning 1,095,000 53,454 146,546 895,000 145,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 Preliminary Engineering - - - - - - - - - - R-O-W (includes Admin)- - - - - - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Post Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenses 1,095,000 53,454 146,546 895,000 145,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 Resources: Vehicle Fuel Tax - - - - - - - - - - Business & Occupation Share 1,093,454 53,454 145,000 895,000 145,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 Fund Balance 1,546 - 1,546 - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (1)- - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (2)- - - - - - - - - - Mitigation - - - - - - - - - - Bonds / LID's Formed - - - - - - - - - - Other (1)- - - - - - - - - - Other (2)- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Undetermined - - - - - - - - - - Total Sources 1,095,000 53,454 146,546 895,000 145,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 1,095,000 - Project Expenditures & Resources Programmed Programmed Pre-2019 Six-Year Program Arterial Circulation Program Transportation will develop a work plan to create a Transit Master Plan. 317 120029 Vangie Garcia 425-430-7319 This program provides for the short and long-range planning and traffic analyses required to evaluate and update proposed transportation improvements projects, to assess the impacts of new development proposals, and to recommend local and regional transportation system improvements for all modes of travel. This program also covers programmatic activities to maintain eligibility for grant funding, such as assuring that project specifications and management comply with current State and Federal standards and regulations, Title VI reporting and ADA Transition Plan implementation. This program will also provide coordination with the I-405 project team, to assure it provides the maximum benefits and minimum problems for Renton's transportation system. State and Federal government regulations and legislation, the Growth Management Act (GMA), and the Puget Sound Regional Council Vision 2040 highlight the increasing importance of making sure that local and regional transportation plans are coordinated to the benefit of Renton make ongoing multi-modal planning a high priority need. In order to meet the City's Business Plan Goals, transportation will play a key role with public and private partnerships to promote economic vitality. This project will fund the ongoing planning work which will lead to refinement and/or adjustment of the of improvement projects on the arterial network identified in the Transportation Element of the City's 2015 Comprehensive Plan and other long-range planning documents. 40 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019 - 2024 TIP No. 14 Project Title:1% For The Arts Program Community Planning Area:N/A Fund: Functional Classification:N/A Project: Project Length:N/A Contact: Project Description: Justification: Status: Changes: Funded:Unfunded: Spent 2017 2018 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Expenditures: Planning 133,823 28,823 15,000 90,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 Preliminary Engineering - - - - - - - - - - R-O-W (includes Admin)- - - - - - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Post Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenses 133,823 28,823 15,000 90,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 Resources: Vehicle Fuel Tax - - - - - - - - - - Business & Occupation Share 133,823 28,823 15,000 90,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 Fund Balance - - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (1)- - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (2)- - - - - - - - - - Mitigation - - - - - - - - - - Bonds / LID's Formed - - - - - - - - - - Other (1)- - - - - - - - - - Other (2)- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Undetermined - - - - - - - - - - Total Sources 133,823 28,823 15,000 90,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 133,823 - Project Expenditures & Resources Programmed Programmed Pre-2019 Six-Year Program 1% For The Arts Program 317 122112 Heather Gregersen 425-430-7393 Funding is tied to the calculated share of eligible types of transportation projects and transportation funding subject to the City's 1% for the Arts Program. All gateway project proposals under this program are subject to approval of the Arts Commission. This program transfers funds to Fund 125, which is being managed by the Department of Community and Economic Development. Program is now based on actual design and construction costs. $11,151 was transferred in 2013 for 2012 capital expenditures. $10,454 was transferred in 2014 for 2013 capital expenditures. $9,344 was transferred in 2015 for 2014 capital expenditures. $16,767 was transferred in 2016 for 2015 expenditures. $28,823 was transferred in 2017 for 2016 expenditures. 41 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019 - 2024 TIP No. 15 Project Title:Bronson Way Bridge - Seismic Retrofit and Painting Community Planning Area:City Center Fund: Functional Classification:N/A Project: Project Length:N/A Contact: Project Description: Justification: Status: Changes: Funded:Unfunded: Pre-2018 2018 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Expenditures: Planning - - - - - - - - - - Preliminary Engineering 620,000 - 70,000 550,000 420,000 130,000 - - - - R-O-W (includes Admin)- - - - - - - - - - Construction 1,950,000 - - 1,950,000 - 1,950,000 - - - - Construction Services 430,000 - - 430,000 - 430,000 - - - - Post Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenses 3,000,000 - 70,000 2,930,000 420,000 2,510,000 - - - - Resources: Vehicle Fuel Tax - - - - - - - - - - Business & Occupation Share - - - - - - - - - - Fund Balance - - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (FHWA Bridge 3,000,000 - 70,000 2,930,000 420,000 2,510,000 - - - - Grants Awarded (2)- - - - - - - - - - Mitigation - - - - - - - - - - Bonds / LID's Formed - - - - - - - - - - Other (1)- - - - - - - - - - Other (2)- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Undetermined - - - - - - - - - - Total Sources 3,000,000 - 70,000 2,930,000 420,000 2,510,000 - - - - 3,000,000 - Project Expenditures & Resources Programmed Programmed Pre-2019 Six-Year Program Bronson Way Bridge - Seismic Retrofit and Painting 317 NEW Derek Akesson 425-430-7337 The Bronson Way Bridge was built by WSDOT in 1939. Ownership was transferred to the City in January 2018 as part of the SR-900 turnback agreement. It is a three span bridge that crosses over the Cedar River. The project will remove the existing paint from the steel girders, repair corrosion damage and apply a new protective paint system. The project will also perform a seismic analysis and retrofit along with other improvements. The main span is carried by steel girders. The girders are coated with paint to protect the steel from corrosion. Corrosion causes section loss which results in a reduced load carrying capacity of the girders. The existing paint is failing. The bridge is located in a zone of moderate to high liquefication susceptibility during seismic events. New project. In April 2018, the project was awarded $3,000,000 of Washington State funding (2018 Supplemental Transportation Budget) to perform a seismic retrofit and painting of the bridge. No local match is required. 42 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019 - 2024 TIP No. 16 Project Title:Duvall Ave NE - NE 7th St to Sunset Blvd NE Community Planning Area:Highlands & East Plateau Fund: Functional Classification:Minor Arterial Project: Project Length:0.67 mi Contact: Project Description: Justification: Status: Changes: Funded:Unfunded: Pre-2018 2018 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Expenditures: Planning - - - - - - - - - - Preliminary Engineering 1,044,136 353,250 335,435 355,451 355,451 - - - - - R-O-W (includes Admin)- - - - - - - - - - Construction 4,559,488 - 3,576,000 983,488 983,488 - - - - - Construction Services 900,200 - 727,000 173,200 173,200 - - - - - Post Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenses 6,503,824 353,250 4,638,435 1,512,139 1,512,139 - - - - - Resources: Vehicle Fuel Tax - - - - - - - - - - Business & Occupation Share 90,000 - 60,000 30,000 30,000 - - - - - Fund Balance & Held Reserve 649,121 90,838 447,658 110,625 110,625 - - - - - Grants Awarded (TIB 74.285%)3,468,289 262,412 3,205,877 - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (DOE 75%)1,223,939 - 174,900 1,049,039 1,049,039 - - - - - Mitigation 1,072,475 - 750,000 322,475 322,475 - - - - - Bonds / LID's Formed - - - - - - - - - - Other (Water Dept)- - - - - - - - - - Other (2)- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Undetermined - - - - - - - - - - Total Sources 6,503,824 353,250 4,638,435 1,512,139 1,512,139 - - - - - 6,503,824 - Project Expenditures & Resources Programmed Programmed Pre-2019 Six-Year Program Duvall Ave NE - NE 7th St to Sunset Blvd NE The City was awarded a TIB grant in the amount of $3,468,289 (2015) for the roadway reconstruction between NE 10th St and NE 12th St, curb, gutter, sidewalk and streetlights on the west side and channelization from NE 12th St to south of the intersection with NE Sunset Blvd. The City was also awarded a Department of Ecology (DOE) grant (2018) in the amount of $1,223,939 for water quality improvements via the installation of water quality treatment facilities. A future phase will install non-motorized improvements along the east side of Duvall Ave NE, from NE 7th St to NE 12th St. This project is anticipated to be ready for construction in early 2019. 317 122702 Flora Lee 425-430-7303 Reconstruction/resurfacing of roadway, including new pavement, curb, gutter, sidewalk, street lights, storm drainage, channelization and bike lanes from NE 7th St to Sunset Blvd NE. Complete roadway improvements, bicycle lanes and sidewalks on Duvall Ave NE, from NE 7th St to Sunset Blvd NE. Condition of the existing roadway pavement requires road reconstruction in segments of the roadway. Project will enhance safety for pedestrians, bicyclists and vehicular along this corridor. 43 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019 - 2024 TIP No. 17 Project Title:Houser Way Bridge - Seismic Retrofit and Painting Community Planning Area:City Center Fund: Functional Classification:N/A Project: Project Length:N/A Contact: Project Description: Justification: Status: Changes: Funded:Unfunded: Pre-2018 2018 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Expenditures: Planning - - - - - - - - - - Preliminary Engineering 620,000 - 70,000 550,000 420,000 130,000 - - - - R-O-W (includes Admin)50,000 - - 50,000 50,000 - - - - - Construction 2,189,450 - - 2,189,450 - 2,189,450 - - - - Construction Services 435,000 - - 435,000 - 212,450 222,550 - - - Post Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenses 3,294,450 - 70,000 3,224,450 470,000 2,531,900 222,550 - - - Resources: Vehicle Fuel Tax - - - - - - - - - - Business & Occupation Share - - - - - - - - - - Fund Balance 72,900 - 9,450 63,450 63,450 - - - - - Grants Awarded (FHWA Bridge 2,999,000 - 60,550 2,938,450 406,550 2,531,900 - - - - Grants Awarded (2)- - - - - - - - - - Mitigation - - - - - - - - - - Bonds / LID's Formed - - - - - - - - - - Other (1)- - - - - - - - - - Other (2)- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Undetermined 222,550 - - 222,550 - - 222,550 - - - Total Sources 3,294,450 - 70,000 3,224,450 470,000 2,531,900 222,550 - - - 3,071,900 222,550 Project Expenditures & Resources Programmed Programmed Pre-2019 Six-Year Program Houser Way Bridge - Seismic Retrofit and Painting 317 NEW Derek Akesson 425-430-7337 The Houser Way Bridge was built by the City of Renton in 1960. It is a three span bridge that crosses over the Cedar River. The project will remove the existing paint from the steel girders, repair corrosion damage and apply a new protective paint system. The project will also perform a seismic analysis and retrofit and replace/upgrade the bridge rails along with other improvements. The main span is carried by steel girders. The girders are coated with paint to protect the steel from corrosion. Corrosion causes section loss which results in a reduced load carrying capacity of the girders. The existing paint is failing. The bridge is located in a zone of moderate to high liquification susceptibility during seismic events. The bridge rail has been damaged. New project. In late 2017, the project was awarded a Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) grant of $2,999,000 to perform a seismic retrofit and painting of the bridge. A 13.5% local match is required for Preliminary Engineering and ROW. If construction is authorized by December 2020, the project is eligible for 100% FHWA funding for the eligible costs. 44 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019 - 2024 TIP No. 18 Project Title:Lake Washington Loop Trail Community Planning Area:City Center Fund: Functional Classification:varies Project: Project Length:N/A Contact: Project Description: Justification: Status: Changes: Funded:Unfunded: Pre-2018 2018 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Expenditures: Planning - - - - - - - - - - Preliminary Engineering 2,261,301 597,219 314,082 1,350,000 - - 1,200,000 150,000 - R-O-W (includes Admin)670,000 - 670,000 - - - - - - - Construction 4,880,000 - 530,000 4,350,000 300,000 1,350,000 - - 200,000 2,500,000 Construction Services 1,492,000 - 27,000 1,465,000 40,000 75,000 - - 600,000 750,000 Post Construction Services - - - - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenses 9,303,301 597,219 1,541,082 7,165,000 340,000 1,425,000 - 1,200,000 950,000 3,250,000 Resources: Vehicle Fuel Tax - - - - - - - - - - Business & Occupation Share 124,984 49,984 - 75,000 - 75,000 - - - - Fund Balance + Held Reserve - - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (TAP)346,000 329,855 16,145 - Grants Awarded (STP ROW)575,000 - 575,000 - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (Ped/Bike Program - PE Phase 3)426,000 217,380 208,620 - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (Ped/Bike Program - CN)430,000 - 370,659 59,341 59,341 - - - - - Grants Awarded (STP - CN Phase 3 1,694,278 370,658 1,323,620 280,659 1,042,961 - - - - Mitigation 307,039 - - 307,039 - 307,039 - - - - Bonds / LID's Formed - - - - - - - - - - Other (1)- - - - - - - - - Other (2)- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Undetermined 5,400,000 - - 5,400,000 - - 1,200,000 950,000 3,250,000 Total Sources 9,303,301 597,219 1,541,082 7,165,000 340,000 1,425,000 - 1,200,000 950,000 3,250,000 3,903,301 5,400,000 Project Expenditures & Resources Programmed Programmed Pre-2019 Six-Year Program Lake Washington Loop Trail Phase 3 construction is expected to start in the fall or winter of 2019. 317 122802 Michelle Faltaous 425-430-7301 The project will construct approximately 1.3 miles of pedestrian and bicycle facilities to complete a gap in the Lake Washington trail system. Improvements include a 12-foot wide combined pedestrian/bicycle path, a landscaped buffer separating the path from the travelled roadway, pedestrian level lighting. For the segment located along Airport Way, the facilities will include a bike track and sidewalk, which will involve removing one westbound lane of traffic on Airport Way. The project will separate pedestrians and bicyclists from the vehicular traffic, enhancing safety and encouraging residents to use active transportation modes. The City was awarded the following grants: TAP = $346,000 (2013); STP Non-Motorized = $575,000 (2015); Ped & Bike = $426,000 (2015); STP = $1,694,278; Ped & Bike Safety = $ 430,000 (under recommendation for 2017). Construction has been implemented in phases, with Phases 1 and 2 completed. Phase 3 (Logan Ave N/Cedar River to Rainier Ave N) design is underway.Phase 4 is from Airport Way/Rainier Ave N intersection to north City limits (programmed in 2020-2022). 45 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019 - 2024 TIP No. 19 Project Title:NE Sunset Boulevard (SR 900) Corridor Improvements Community Planning Area:Highlands Fund: Functional Classification:Principal Project: Project Length:3.0 mi Contact: Project Description: Justification: Status: Changes: Funded:Unfunded: Pre-2018 2018 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Expenditures: Planning 200,000 200,000 - - - - - - - - Preliminary Engineering 3,500,833 501,831 990,002 2,009,000 209,000 - 1,000,000 600,000 200,000 - R-O-W (includes Admin)3,300,000 - - 3,300,000 250,000 2,750,000 300,000 - - - Construction 20,000,000 - - 20,000,000 - - 5,000,000 5,000,000 5,000,000 5,000,000 Construction Services 5,000,000 - - 5,000,000 - - 1,250,000 1,250,000 1,250,000 1,250,000 Post Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenses 32,000,833 701,831 990,002 30,309,000 459,000 2,750,000 7,550,000 6,850,000 6,450,000 6,250,000 Resources: Vehicle Fuel Tax - - - - - - - - - - Business & Occupation Share 312,866 2,364 277,527 32,975 32,975 - - - - - Fund Balance + Held Reserve 324,032 74,032 250,000 - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (STP/CMAQ)1,313,935 425,435 462,475 426,025 426,025 - - - - - Grants Awarded (2)- - - - - - - - - - Mitigation - - - - - - - - - - Bonds / LID's Formed - - - - - - - - - - Other (REET)200,000 200,000 - - - - - - - - Other (2)- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Undetermined 29,850,000 - - 29,850,000 - 2,750,000 7,550,000 6,850,000 6,450,000 6,250,000 Total Sources 32,000,833 701,831 990,002 30,309,000 459,000 2,750,000 7,550,000 6,850,000 6,450,000 6,250,000 2,150,833 29,850,000 Project Expenditures & Resources Programmed Programmed Pre-2019 Six-Year Program NE Sunset Boulevard (SR 900) Corridor Improvements 30% Design of the corridor improvements is completed. WSDOT is currently reviewing the channelization plan. Project will be on hold until ROW funding can be identified. 317 122902 Keith Woolley 425-430-7318 This project will seek to address pedestrian, transit and bicycle needs. This corridor needs a series of key improvements to improve traffic operations such as channelization, traffic signal modifications, signal treatments, possible queue jumps, access management through installation of medians. The corridor limits are from I-405 on the west and to the east City limits. This corridor has strong potential for non-motorized and transit usage. The Sunset area is experiencing residential and retail growth. The Sunset Area Planned Action EIS prepared in 2011 delineated transportation needs along Sunset Blvd from N Park Dr to Monroe Ave NE (estimated at $33M). The project has received a STP/CMAQ grant in the amount of $1,313,935 for design and is on the PSRC contingency list for ROW funding. Transportation will continue to look into other funding sources, such as TIB, for the ROW and construction phases. 46 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019 - 2024 TIP No. 20 Project Title:Park Avenue North Extension Community Planning Area:City Center Fund: Functional Classification:N/A Project: Project Length:0.23 mi Contact: Project Description: Justification: Status: Changes: Funded:Unfunded: Pre-2018 2018 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Expenditures: Planning - - - - - - - - - - Preliminary Engineering 1,000,000 100,091 649,909 250,000 250,000 - - - - - R-O-W (includes Admin)1,500,000 - 300,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 - - - - - Construction 4,000,000 - - 4,000,000 3,500,000 500,000 - - - - Construction Services 1,000,000 - - 1,000,000 875,000 125,000 - - - - Post Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Other (BNSF/Gate)- - - - - - - - - - Total Expenses 7,500,000 100,091 949,909 6,450,000 5,825,000 625,000 - - - - Resources: Vehicle Fuel Tax - - - - - - - - - - Business & Occupation Share - - - - - - - - - - Fund Balance - - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (1)- - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (2)- - - - - - - - - - Mitigation 100,091 100,091 - - - - - - - - Bonds / LID's Formed - - - - - - - - - - Other (LRF)7,399,909 - 949,909 6,450,000 5,825,000 625,000 - - - - Other (Developer)- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Undetermined - - - - - - - - - - Total Sources 7,500,000 100,091 949,909 6,450,000 5,825,000 625,000 - - - - Park Avenue North Extension 7,500,000 - Project Expenditures & Resources Programmed Programmed Pre-2019 Six-Year Program 317 122190 Hebe Bernardo 425-430-7232 The project will extend Park Ave N to the north of Logan Ave N, to provide access to Southport, PSE property and The Boeing Company. Improvements include bicycle and pedestrian facilities, illumination, landscaping. With the additional development growth in the North Renton area, which includes The Landing and the Southport residential/hotel/office development, this project will construct improvements to improve accessibility. The design work will be completed in 2019 and the project is scheduled to go to bid in June of 2019. 47 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019 - 2024 TIP No. 21 Project Title:Rainier Ave S/N Phase 4 - S 3rd Street to NW 3rd Pl Community Planning Area:City Center Fund: Functional Classification:Principal Project: Project Length:0.51 mi Contact: Project Description: Justification: Status: Changes: Funded:Unfunded: Pre-2018 2018 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Expenditures: Planning - - - - - - - - - - Preliminary Engineering 3,000,000 543,395 1,505,282 951,323 500,000 451,323 - - - - R-O-W (includes Admin)3,500,000 - - 3,500,000 1,000,000 1,500,000 1,000,000 - - - Construction 10,500,000 - - 10,500,000 - - 6,000,000 4,500,000 - - Construction Services 3,300,000 - - 3,300,000 - - 1,800,000 1,350,000 150,000 - Post Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenses 20,300,000 543,395 1,505,282 18,251,323 1,500,000 1,951,323 8,800,000 5,850,000 150,000 - Resources: Vehicle Fuel Tax - - - - - - - - - - Business & Occupation Share 709,600 56,387 103,213 550,000 - - 100,000 450,000 - - Fund Balance 239,552 39,552 100,000 100,000 - - 100,000 - - - Grants Awarded (STP PE)2,600,000 447,456 1,302,069 850,475 750,475 100,000 - - - - Grants Awarded (STP ROW)3,000,000 - - 3,000,000 442,000 1,258,000 1,300,000 - - - Grants Awarded (STP CN)4,500,000 - - 4,500,000 - - 4,500,000 - - - Mitigation 2,695,848 - - 2,695,848 307,525 593,323 700,000 945,000 150,000 - Bonds / LID's Formed - - - - - - - - - - Other (TIB Grant)*6,555,000 - - 6,555,000 - - 2,100,000 4,455,000 - - - - - - - - - - - - Undetermined - - - - - - - - - - Total Sources 20,300,000 543,395 1,505,282 18,251,323 1,500,000 1,951,323 8,800,000 5,850,000 150,000 - 20,300,000 - Project Expenditures & Resources Programmed Programmed Pre-2019 Six-Year Program Rainier Ave S/N Phase 4 - S 3rd Street to NW 3rd Pl Phase 4 of the Rainier Ave S Corridor Improvements has been separated into two phases due to cost and feasibility. Currently, there is a Renton Airport Master Plan process that may affect the alignment of Airport Way, which is at the northern end of Phase 4. This grant request is to fund the construction of Phase 4A from S 3rd St to S Tobin St. The City of Renton will construct Phase 4B after the Airport Master Plan is final and approved. *Transportation plans to also apply for a TIB grant for the construction of Phase 4A. Previous phases of Rainier were constructed with TIB funds but if this phase does not receive TIB funding, the City will use local funds to construct the project. 317 122195 Michelle Faltaous 425-430-7301 This is Phase 4 of the Rainier Ave Corridor Improvements, and will extend the improvements from S 3rd St to NW 3rd Pl. Project elements include sidewalk widening with streetscaping, adding pedestrian-scale illumination, adding a pedestrian actuated traffic signal, upgrading existing traffic signals, transit facility improvements, planted buffer strips and landscaped medians. Also includes a ped/bike path on the east side of Rainier Ave N, between Airport Way and NW 3rd Pl. Rainier Ave is a critical corridor in central Renton with existing operational problems and in need of infrastructure enhancements to provide greater ease of non-motorized and transit-based travel. It also provides improved access to the Renton Airport and Boeing's Renton Plant. Improvements will enhance traffic flow and reduce accidents. A STP grant in the amount of $2,600,000 was awarded (2014) for design of Phase 4 and design is currently underway. Additional STP grants were awarded for Right-of-Way for $3,000,000 and for construction of Phase 4A for $4,500,000. 48 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019 - 2024 TIP No. 22 Project Title:Renton Connector Community Planning Area:City Center Fund: Functional Classification:Urban Collector Project: Project Length:0.5 mi Contact: Project Description: Justification: Status: Changes: Funded:Unfunded: Pre-2018 2018 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Expenditures: Planning - - - - - - - - - - Preliminary Engineering 1,500,000 - - 1,500,000 - - 278,700 621,300 600,000 - R-O-W (includes Admin)- - - - - - - - - - Construction 12,213,000 - - 12,213,000 - - - - 3,363,000 8,850,000 Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Post Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenses 13,713,000 - - 13,713,000 - - 278,700 621,300 3,963,000 8,850,000 Resources: Vehicle Fuel Tax - - - - - - - - - - Business & Occupation Share - - - - - - - - - - Fund Balance - - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (1)- - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (2)- - - - - - - - - - Mitigation - - - - - - - - - - Bonds / LID's Formed - - - - - - - - - - Other (1)- - - - - - - - - - Other (2)- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Undetermined 13,713,000 - - 13,713,000 - - 278700 621,300 3,963,000 8,850,000 Total Sources 13,713,000 - - 13,713,000 - - 278,700 621,300 3,963,000 8,850,000 - 13,713,000 Project Expenditures & Resources Programmed Programmed Pre-2019 Six-Year Program Renton Connector 317 NEW Vangie Garcia 425-430-7319 The Renton Connector project will install a continuous non-motorized facility along Burnett Ave S. between S. 2nd St and S. 5th St via separated walkways, protected bicycle lanes (cycle track), and a multi-use path. This project will also include reduced travel lanes, landscaped medians, and reconfigured public parking areas in order to provide opportunities to incorporate art, play spaces, and resting areas along the connector. Intersection improvements will include traffic signalization improvements and curb ramp upgrades to ADA standards. As a key element of the Downtown Civic Core Vision and Action Plan, The Renton Connector is a new urban trail, or "greenway", that creates a signature Civic Core and Downtown green spine and regional trail connection between the Cedar River Trail, Lake to Sound Trail, Lake Washington Loop Trail, and the Eastside Rail Corridor for pedestrians and cyclists between the Cedar River, City Hall and the South Renton Transit Center to the South. New Project. Project is pending funding availability. Transportation has applied for grants to begin design and will continue to look into other funding sources. 49 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019 - 2024 TIP No. 23 Project Title:116th Ave SE Improvements Community Planning Area:Benson Fund: Functional Classification:Minor Arterial Project: Project Length:2.5 mi Contact: Project Description: Justification: Status: Changes: Funded:Unfunded: Pre-2018 2018 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Expenditures: Planning - - - - - - - - - - Preliminary Engineering 1,313,179 113,179 - 1,200,000 - - 600,000 600,000 - - R-O-W (includes Admin)2,800,000 - - 2,800,000 - - 1,000,000 1,800,000 - - Construction 5,315,028 615,028 - 4,700,000 - - - 1,000,000 2,000,000 1,700,000 Construction Services 1,547,102 147,102 - 1,400,000 - - - 300,000 600,000 500,000 Post Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenses 10,975,309 875,309 - 10,100,000 - - 1,600,000 3,700,000 2,600,000 2,200,000 Resources: Vehicle Fuel Tax - - - - - - - - - - Business & Occupation Share 221,638 221,638 - - - - - - - - Fund Balance - - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (CMAQ+SRTS)653,671 653,671 - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (2)- - - - - - - - - - Mitigation - - - - - - - - - - Bonds / LID's Formed - - - - - - - - - - Other (1)- - - - - - - - - - Other (2)- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Undetermined 10,100,000 - - 10,100,000 - - 1,600,000 3,700,000 2,600,000 2,200,000 Total Sources 10,975,309 875,309 - 10,100,000 - - 1,600,000 3,700,000 2,600,000 2,200,000 875,309 10,100,000 Project Expenditures & Resources Programmed Programmed Pre-2019 Six-Year Program 116th Ave SE Improvements Transportation applied for a FY 2020 WSDOT Pedestrian-Bicycle grant for the design of a walkway and a bike lane on the west side of 116th Ave SE, between SE 168th St and SE 160th St. 317 122117 Flora Lee 425-430-7303 Widen roadway to provide a 3-lane roadway with bike lanes along 116th Ave SE and Edmonds Way SE, including new pavement, curb, gutter, sidewalk, street lights, traffic signals, storm drainage, channelization and landscaping from Puget Drive SE to the southern City limits. Benson Hill Community Plan recommended improvements for a first phase, based on the neighborhood needs. The priority, cost and schedule for the phased improvements will be determined based on available funding. 116th Ave SE is classified as a minor arterial. Non-continuous segments of sidewalk exist along the roadway. Improvements will enhance vehicular, bicycle and pedestrian safety along this important north-south transportation corridor. The corridor improvements are estimated at $33M. Phase 1 Improvements (SE Petrovitsky Rd to SE 168th St) are shown as programmed for 2020-2024. Staff will be developing scope, cost and schedule for future phases. 50 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019 - 2024 TIP No. 24 Project Title:South 2nd Street Conversion Project Community Planning Area:City Center Fund: Functional Classification:Principal Project: Project Length:0.5 mi Contact: Project Description: Justification: Status: Changes: Funded:Unfunded: Pre-2018 2018 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Expenditures: Planning - - - - - - - - - - Preliminary Engineering 1,450,000 - - 1,450,000 100,000 1,350,000 - - - R-O-W (includes Admin)- - - - - - - - - - Construction 12,000,000 - - 12,000,000 - - - 6,000,000 6,000,000 - Construction Services 3,600,000 - - 3,600,000 - - - 1,800,000 1,800,000 - Post Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenses 17,050,000 - - 17,050,000 - 100,000 1,350,000 7,800,000 7,800,000 - Resources: Vehicle Fuel Tax - - - - - - - - - - Business & Occupation Share 100,000 - - 100,000 - 100,000 - - - - Fund Balance - - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (STP)1,200,000 - - 1,200,000 - - 1,200,000 - - - Grants Awarded (2)- - - - - - - - - - Mitigation - - - - - - - - - - Bonds / LID's Formed - - - - - - - - - - Other (WSDOT Turnback)364,931 - - 364,931 - - 150,000 214,931 - - Other (2)- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Undetermined 15,385,069 - - 15,385,069 - - 7,585,069 7,800,000 - Total Sources 17,050,000 - - 17,050,000 - 100,000 1,350,000 7,800,000 7,800,000 - South 2nd Street Conversion Project 1,664,931 15,385,069 Project Expenditures & Resources Programmed Programmed Pre-2019 Six-Year Program The City was awarded $1.2M STP funds for preliminary engineering in the PSRC Countywide competition. There is $300,000 for this project that is third in line on the Regional project contingency list. 317 Vangie Garcia 425-430-7319 The South 2nd Street Conversion Project will be improving multimodal mobility in around the downtown core by converting an existing 4–lane one-way roadway to a roadway with one through-lane in each direction between Main Ave South and Rainier Ave South. This project also includes pedestrian and bicycle facilities, traffic operations improvements, and transit upgrades that will provide better traffic operation and circulation for all modes of transportation. The improvements include a westbound bypass transit lane from just west of Logan Ave S to just east of Lake Avenue. Transit facility upgrades include new RapidRide stops and a transit queue jump at the new traffic signal at the Shattuck intersection. This project is one of the strategies identified in the City Center Community Plan as well as the Downtown Civic Core Action Plan. The project enhances downtown Renton as a destination area, while improving circulation and enhancing pedestrian safety and environment. The intersection of S 2nd St and Burnett is key connection to The Renton Connector Project (TIP No. 22) Since grant funding for design is for FY 2021, we hope to request advance construction funds to get started on design in order to apply for more grant opportunities. 51 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019 - 2024 TIP No. 25 Project Title:Williams Ave Bridge - Seismic Retrofit and Painting Community Planning Area:City Center Fund: Functional Classification:N/A Project: Project Length:N/A Contact: Project Description: Justification: Status: Changes: Funded:Unfunded: Pre-2018 2018 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Expenditures: Planning - - - - - - - - - - Preliminary Engineering 620,000 - 70,000 550,000 420,000 130,000 - - - - R-O-W (includes Admin)50,000 - - 50,000 50,000 - - - - - Construction 2,175,450 - - 2,175,450 - 2,175,450 - - - - Construction Services 435,000 - - 435,000 - 435,000 - - - - Post Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenses 3,280,450 - 70,000 3,210,450 470,000 2,740,450 - - - - Resources: Vehicle Fuel Tax - - - - - - - - - - Business & Occupation Share 132,000 - 9,450 122,550 - 122,550 - - - - Fund Balance 163,450 - - 163,450 63,450 100,000 - - - - Grants Awarded (FHWA Bridge 2,985,000 - 60,550 2,924,450 406,550 2,517,900 - - - - Grants Awarded (2)- - - - - - - - - - Mitigation - - - - - - - - - - Bonds / LID's Formed - - - - - - - - - - Other (1)- - - - - - - - - - Other (2)- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Undetermined - - - - - - - - - - Total Sources 3,280,450 - 70,000 3,210,450 470,000 2,740,450 - - - - 3,280,450 - Project Expenditures & Resources Programmed Programmed Pre-2019 Six-Year Program Williams Ave Bridge - Seismic Retrofit and Painting 317 NEW Derek Akesson 425-430-7337 The Williams Ave Bridge was built by the City of Renton in 1954. It is a three span bridge that crosses over the Cedar River. The project will remove the existing paint from the steel girders, repair corrosion damage and apply a new protective paint system. The project will also perform a seismic analysis and retrofit along with other improvements. The main span is carried by steel girders. The girders are coated with paint to protect the steel from corrosion. Corrosion causes section loss which results in a reduced load carrying capacity of the girders. The existing paint is failing. The bridge is located in a zone of moderate to high liquefication susceptibility during seismic events. New project. In late 2017, the project was awarded a Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) grant of $2,985,000 to perform a seismic retrofit and painting of the bridge. A 13.5% local match is required for Preliminary Engineering and ROW. If construction is authorized by December 2020, the project is eligible for 100% FHWA funding for eligible costs. 52 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019 - 2024 TIP No. 26 Project Title:Williams Ave S and Wells Ave S Conversion Project Community Planning Area:City Center Fund: Functional Classification:Principal Project: Project Length:N/A Contact: Project Description: Justification: Status: Changes: Funded:Unfunded: Pre-2018 2018 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Expenditures: Planning - - - - - - - - - - Preliminary Engineering 1,147,300 128,030 1,019,270 - - - - - - - R-O-W (includes Admin)130,000 - 130,000 - - - - - - - Construction 7,547,000 - 2,364,931 5,182,069 1,233,800 3,948,269 - - - - Construction Services 2,100,000 - - 2,100,000 500,000 1,600,000 - - - - Post Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Other (BNSF CM Agreement)1,000,000 - - 1,000,000 200,000 800,000 - - - - Total Expenses 11,924,300 128,030 3,514,201 8,282,069 1,933,800 6,348,269 - - - - Resources: Vehicle Fuel Tax - - - - - - - - - - Business & Occupation Share 220,000 - 10,000 210,000 30,000 180,000 - - - - Fund Balance 540,000 128,030 411,970 - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (1)- - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (STP)3,850,000 - - 3,850,000 1,453,800 2,396,200 - - - - Mitigation 1,157,965 - 407,965 750,000 450,000 300,000 - - - - Bonds / LID's Formed - - - - - - - - - - Other (WSDOT Mitigation)319,335 - 319,335 - - - - - - - Other (WSDOT Turnback)2,364,931 - 2,364,931 - - - - - - - Other (Utilties Reimb)- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Undetermined 3,472,069 - - 3,472,069 - 3,472,069 - - - - Total Sources 11,924,300 128,030 3,514,201 8,282,069 1,933,800 6,348,269 - - - - 8,452,231 3,472,069 Project Expenditures & Resources Programmed Programmed Pre-2019 Six-Year Program Williams Ave S and Wells Ave S Conversion Project The City was awarded a STP grant in the amount of $3,850,000 in 2016. Design starting in 2017 and construction is anticipated to start in 2019. 317 122908 Keith Woolley 425-430-7318 The project provides pedestrian and bicyclists facilities and enhancements, traffic operation and circulation improvements in Downtown. The improvements include adding signalized raised intersections with bulb outs, lighting, street furniture, streetscape, bike racks, signage and converting Williams Ave S and Wells Ave S to two-way traffic operations. This project is one of the strategies identified in the City Center Community Plan. The project enhances downtown Renton as a destination area, while improving circulation, reducing traffic speeds and enhancing pedestrian safety. A feasibility study, including a Downtown Circulation Traffic Analysis for the conversion to two-way operations was completed. 53 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019 - 2024 TIP No. 27 Project Title:Carr Road Improvements Community Planning Area:Talbot & Benson Fund: Functional Classification:Major Arterial Project: Project Length:N/A Contact: Project Description: Justification: Status: Changes: Funded:Unfunded: Pre-2018 2018 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Expenditures: Planning 50,000 - - 50,000 50,000 - - - - - Preliminary Engineering 784,421 666,866 117,555 - - - - - - - R-O-W (includes Admin)- - - - - - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Post Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenses 834,421 666,866 117,555 50,000 50,000 - - - - - Resources: Vehicle Fuel Tax - - - - - - - - - - Business & Occupation Share - - - - - - - - - - Fund Balance 78,424 78,424 - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (Fed Safety)660,000 542,445 117,555 - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (2)- - - - - - - - - - Mitigation 95,997 45,997 - 50,000 50,000 - - - - - Bonds / LID's Formed - - - - - - - - - - Other (1)- - - - - - - - - - Other (2)- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Undetermined - - - - - - - - - - Total Sources 834,421 666,866 117,555 50,000 50,000 - - - - - 834,421 - Project Expenditures & Resources Programmed Programmed Pre-2019 Six-Year Program Carr Road Improvements 317 122920 Vangie Garcia 425-430-7319 A corridor study prepared by King County in 2003 identified the need for roadway improvements from Lind Ave SW and SW 43rd St intersection and extend east crossing SR 167 and ending at 116th Ave SE. Potential improvements vary from roadway realignment/widening at several locations to address geometric deficiencies, widening to 5-lane roadway (2 lanes westbound, 3 lanes eastbound), including bicycle lanes on new alignment. The total project cost is estimated as $80M. Carr Road is classified as a principal arterial. It has four lanes of traffic with left-turn lanes at intersections. Improvements are necessary to enhance vehicle traffic capacity and safety for vehicles, bicycles, and pedestrians on this major east-west transportation corridor. Future roadway improvement options include spot safety improvements, bicycle and pedestrian improvements, roadway widening and roadway on new alignment. Staff will be developing scope, cost and schedule for the intersection of Talbot Rd near Valley Medical Center. 54 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019 - 2024 TIP No. 28 Project Title:Houser Way S/N Non-Motorized Improvements Community Planning Area:City Center Fund: Functional Classification:Principal Arterial Project: Project Length:0.36 mi Contact: Project Description: Justification: Status: Changes: Funded:Unfunded: Pre-2018 2018 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Expenditures: Planning - - - - - - - - - - Preliminary Engineering 220,000 - - 220,000 - - - 220,000 - - R-O-W (includes Admin)165,000 - - 165,000 - - - 165,000 - - Construction 750,000 - - 750,000 - - - - 400,000 350,000 Construction Services 900,000 - - 900,000 - - - - 360,000 540,000 Post Construction Services 152,000 - - 152,000 - - - - 76,000 76,000 Other - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenses 2,187,000 - - 2,187,000 - - - 385,000 836,000 966,000 Resources: Vehicle Fuel Tax - - - - - - - - - - Business & Occupation Share - - - - - - - - - - Fund Balance - - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (1)- - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (2)- - - - - - - - - - Mitigation - - - - - - - - - - Bonds / LID's Formed - - - - - - - - - - Other (1)- - - - - - - - - - Other (2)- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Undetermined 2,187,000 - - 2,187,000 - - - 385,000 836,000 966,000 Total Sources 2,187,000 - - 2,187,000 - - - 385,000 836,000 966,000 - 2,187,000 Project Expenditures & Resources Programmed Programmed Pre-2019 Six-Year Program Houser Way S/N Non-Motorized Improvements 317 NEW Vangie Garcia 425-430-7319 This project would install a separated bike facility on the north side of Houser Way S/N, between Mill Ave S. and Bronson Way N. Intersection crossings would be improved at Cedar River Park Drive and Mill Ave S. The project will include planing and pavement overlay, channelization, and intersection crossing improvements. For feasibility and constructibility issues, the roadway and pedestrian bridge sections would not be part of this project. The feedback during the public engagement process for the Trails and Bicycle Master Plan update identified Houser Way as the route for the Eastside Rail Corridor alignment. With the development of the Civic Core Plan, development of this section of the bicycle network creates an important connection point for bicycle traffic between the north and south portions of the City's urban growth center. Creating a bike facility down to Mill Ave S creates a connection to the Cedar River Trail. The crossing at Cedar River Park Drive is a connection point for people connecting from Liberty Park to the Renton Community Center. New Project. 55 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019 - 2024 TIP No. 29 Project Title:Houser Way North - North 8th Street to Lake Washington Blvd Community Planning Area:City Center Fund: Functional Classification:N/A Project: Project Length:N/A Contact: Project Description: Justification: Status: Changes: Funded:Unfunded: Pre-2018 2018 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Expenditures: Planning - - - - - - - - - - Preliminary Engineering 900,000 - - 900,000 - - - 900,000 - - R-O-W (includes Admin)165,000 - - 165,000 - - - 165,000 - - Construction 3,000,000 - - 3,000,000 - - - - 1,200,000 1,800,000 Construction Services 900,000 - - 900,000 - - - - 360,000 540,000 Post Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenses 4,965,000 - - 4,965,000 - - - 1,065,000 1,560,000 2,340,000 Resources: Vehicle Fuel Tax - - - - - - - - - - Business & Occupation Share - - - - - - - - - - Fund Balance - - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (1)- - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (2)- - - - - - - - - - Mitigation - - - - - - - - - - Bonds / LID's Formed - - - - - - - - - - Other (1)- - - - - - - - - - Other (2)- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Undetermined 4,965,000 - - 4,965,000 - - - 1,065,000 1,560,000 2,340,000 Total Sources 4,965,000 - - 4,965,000 - - - 1,065,000 1,560,000 2,340,000 317 Houser Way North - North 8th Street to Lake Washington Blvd Bob Mahn 425-430-7322 This project will widen and realign the existing one lane roadway to a two-lane roadway and includes intersection improvements to convert Houser Way N to a two-way operation. Includes new roadway, curbs, pedestrian-bicycle path, drainage, signals, lighting, signing and channelization. The City of Renton travel demand model predicts traffic volumes increasing significantly in the North Renton Area in the near future. One of the recommendations to improve northbound access to Lake Washington Blvd is to convert Houser Way N to a two-way operations, between N 8th St and Lake Washington Blvd. A conceptual layout of the two-way approach to the intersection of Houser Way and Lake WA Blvd has been completed. This project will coordinate with the Southport Development improvements to the Southport entrance at the Lake WA Blvd/Coulon Park intersection. - 4,965,000 Project Expenditures & Resources Programmed Programmed Pre-2019 Six-Year Program 56 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019 - 2024 TIP No. 30 Project Title:Lake to Sound (L2S) Trail Community Planning Area:Valley & City Center Fund: Functional Classification:Minor and Principal Arterial, and Other Project: Project Length:1.6 mi Contact: Project Description: Justification: Status: Changes: Funded:Unfunded: Pre-2018 2018 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Expenditures: Planning - - - - - - - - - - Preliminary Engineering 800,000 800,000 - - - - - - - - R-O-W (includes Admin)110,000 110,000 - - - - - - - - Construction 2,240,000 - - 2,240,000 2,240,000 - - - - - Construction Services 560,000 - - 560,000 560,000 - - - - - Post Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenses 3,710,000 910,000 - 2,800,000 2,800,000 - - - - - Resources: Vehicle Fuel Tax - - - - - - - - - - Business & Occupation Share - - - - - - - - - - Fund Balance - - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (1)- - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (2)- - - - - - - - - - Mitigation - - - - - - - - - - Bonds / LID's Formed - - - - - - - - - - Other (KC+CMAQ Grant)3,710,000 910,000 - 2,800,000 2,800,000 - - - - - Other (2)- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Undetermined - - - - - - - - - - Total Sources 3,710,000 910,000 - 2,800,000 2,800,000 - - - - - 3,710,000 - Project Expenditures & Resources Programmed Programmed Pre-2019 Six-Year Program Lake to Sound (L2S) Trail If L2S uses BNSF ROW for central section, the alignment would likely be on the south side, lower bank. Downtown Civic Core team prefers alignment with city-owned Houser Way section along the south side of ROW. Alignment within BNSF would require King County to purchase ROW and new bridges to cross roadways. An alignment on 7th Street can be developed as a reasonable alternative or parallel route as a trail within railroad ROW is developed (TIP #42). 317 122903 Vangie Garcia 425-430-7319 The Lake to Sound (L2S) Trail is a joint partnership between the cities of Renton, SeaTac, Tukwila, Burien and Des Moines, in coordination with King County. The 17-mile L2S Trail will provide an east-west connection between the shoreline of Lake Washington (Renton) and the shoreline of Puget Sound (Des Moines). Phase A goes from Naches Ave SW (Renton) to Fort Dent Park (Tukwila). The length between Naches Ave SW and Mill Ave S are future phases. Phase A will connect Fort Dent (Tukwila) to the larger system of regional trails in South King County, including the Green River Trail, the Interurban Trail and the Cedar River Trail. Phase A will provide a 12-foot wide asphalt paved multi-use trail, with 2-foot gravel shoulders. In the Downtown Civic Core Plan, the L2S Trail connects to the Eastside Rail Corridor (ERC) and the Renton Connector (TIP #22). This project received a $950,000 CMAQ grant for construction of Phase A (Naches Ave SW to Fort Dent Park inTukwila), in 2014. No City match is required. King County is leading the design for construction of Phase A, Fort Dent Park Connection. Construction of Phase A is anticipated to be completed in 2019. City staff will be developing scope, cost and schedule for future phases. 57 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019 - 2024 TIP No. 31 Project Title:Lake Washington Blvd N - Park Ave N to Gene Coulon Memorial Park Community Planning Area:City Center Fund: Functional Classification:Collector Project: Project Length:N/A Contact: Project Description: Justification: Status: Changes: Funded:Unfunded: Pre-2018 2018 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Expenditures: Planning 14,899 14,899 - - - - - - - - Preliminary Engineering 28,460 28,460 - - - - - - - - R-O-W (includes Admin)- - - - - - - - - - Construction 1,973,821 373,821 - 1,600,000 1,600,000 - - - - - Construction Services 410,363 10,363 - 400,000 400,000 - - - - - Post Construction Services 15,934 15,934 - - - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenses 2,443,477 443,477 - 2,000,000 2,000,000 - - - - - Resources: Vehicle Fuel Tax 2,807 2,807 - - - - - - - - Business & Occupation Share 2,734 2,734 - - - - - - - - Fund Balance 8,828 8,828 - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (1)149,501 149,501 - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (2)- - - - - - - - - - Mitigation 258,353 258,353 - - - - - - - - Bonds / LID's Formed - - - - - - - - - - Other (Dev. Expend)2,000,000 - - 2,000,000 2,000,000 - - - - - Other (Dev. Reimb)21,253 21,253 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Undetermined - - - - - - - - - - Total Sources 2,443,476 443,476 - 2,000,000 2,000,000 - - - - - 2,443,476 - Project Expenditures & Resources Programmed Programmed Pre-2019 Six-Year Program Lake Washington Blvd N - Park Ave N to Gene Coulon Memorial Park Last Phase underway. Design for Lake Washington Blvd is complete. Construction to start in the summer of 2018 and be completed by the end of 2019. 317 122121 Bob Hanson 425-430-7319 This project includes road widening, traffic signals, railroad crossings, drainage, curb, gutter, sidewalks and bicycle lanes. Developer to design and construct improvements, and get credit toward mitigation contribution. The developer is completing the project in 3 phases. This project will serve the development and access needs to Coulon Park and the Southport Development. Agreement with developer to credit traffic mitigation towards the costs of certain improvements. The hotel tower was complete in 2018. The office towers are under construction. This project will be funded by the development of Southport. The costs shown below are for the estimated mitigation credit, per agreement with the developer. 58 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019 - 2024 TIP No. 32 Project Title:Lind Ave SW - SW 16th St to SW 43rd St Community Planning Area:Valley Fund: Functional Classification:Minor Arterial Project: Project Length:1.69 mi Contact: Project Description: Justification: Status: Changes: Funded:Unfunded: Pre-2018 2018 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Expenditures: Planning - - - - - - - - - - Preliminary Engineering 650,000 - - 650,000 - - - 400,000 250,000 - R-O-W (includes Admin)- - - - - - - - - - Construction 3,200,000 - - 3,200,000 - - - - 1,200,000 2,000,000 Construction Services 550,000 - - 550,000 - - - - 200,000 350,000 Post Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenses 4,400,000 - - 4,400,000 - - - 400,000 1,650,000 2,350,000 Resources: Vehicle Fuel Tax - - - - - - - - - - Business & Occupation Share - - - - - - - - - - Fund Balance - - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (1)- - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (2)- - - - - - - - - - Mitigation - - - - - - - - - - Bonds / LID's Formed - - - - - - - - - - Other (1)- - - - - - - - - - Other (2)- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Undetermined 4,400,000 - - 4,400,000 - - - 400,000 1,650,000 2,350,000 Total Sources 4,400,000 - - 4,400,000 - - - 400,000 1,650,000 2,350,000 - 4,400,000 Project Expenditures & Resources Programmed Programmed Pre-2019 Six-Year Program Lind Ave SW - SW 16th St to SW 43rd St 317 120024 Bob Mahn 425-430-7322 Widen existing roadway to five lanes where required. Includes new roadway, curbs, sidewalks, drainage, signals, lighting, signing and channelization. Increasing traffic demands in the Valley due in part to development will create the need to increase the capacity of this major north/south arterial. A potential project is a signal installation at the intersection at Lind Ave SW and SW 34th St (currently unsignalized). Additionally, improvements may result from future WSDOT I-405 plans which include an interchange at Lind Ave SW (currently unfunded). The needs, priorities and schedules for improvements on Lind Ave SW will be determined through Arterial Circulation studies. 59 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019 - 2024 TIP No. 33 Project Title:Logan Ave North Improvements Community Planning Area:City Center Fund: Functional Classification:Principal Arterial Project: Project Length:0.76 mi Contact: Project Description: Justification: Status: Changes: Funded:Unfunded: Pre-2018 2018 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Expenditures: Planning 39,760 39,760 - - - - - - - - Preliminary Engineering 3,245,616 1,005,616 - 2,240,000 - - - - 1,240,000 1,000,000 R-O-W (includes Admin)9,033,266 33,266 - 9,000,000 - - - - - 9,000,000 Construction 5,108,330 4,908,330 200,000 - - - - - - - Construction Services 1,167,070 1,081,070 86,000 - - - - - - - Post Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenses 18,594,042 7,068,042 286,000 11,240,000 - - - - 1,240,000 10,000,000 Resources: Vehicle Fuel Tax - - - - - - - - - - Business & Occupation Share 27,065 27,065 - - - - - - - - Fund Balance 59,090 20,111 38,979 - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (STP)3,074,943 2,988,943 86,000 - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (TIB)3,912,242 3,751,221 161,021 - - - - - - - Mitigation 200,000 200,000 - - - - - - - - Bonds / LID's Formed - - - - - - - - - - Other (Integra Phone)53,702 53,702 - - - - - - - - Other (Boeing Lot)27,000 27,000 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Undetermined 11,240,000 - - 11,240,000 - - - - 1,240,000 10,000,000 Total Sources 18,594,042 7,068,042 286,000 11,240,000 - - - - 1,240,000 10,000,000 Logan Ave North Improvements 7,354,042 11,240,000 Project Expenditures & Resources Programmed Programmed Pre-2019 Six-Year Program Project has been closed out for Phase 1. 317 122303 Vangie Garcia 425-430-7319 Phase 1 (Cedar River Bridge to N 6th St) is complete. Phase 2 (N 6th St to Park Ave N) will add a NB lane, new curb, gutter, sidewalks (on the east side), landscaped buffer, and a pedestrian/bicycle trail (west side), streetlights, pedestrian scale illumination, crosswalks, channelization. The increase in traffic and the new RapidRide transit have warranted widening to add a northbound lane. Included with the improvements are urban roadway amenities to implement "Complete Streets" practice per City code. Project is on hold until the Boeing Company is in a position to dedicate property to the project. 60 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019 - 2024 TIP No. 34 Project Title:Maple Valley Highway Barriers Community Planning Area:Cedar River Fund: Functional Classification:Principal Arterial Project: Project Length:N/A Contact: Project Description: Justification: Status: Changes: Funded:Unfunded: Pre-2018 2018 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Expenditures: Planning - - - - - - - - - - Preliminary Engineering 522,970 - - 522,970 - - 274,035 248,935 - - R-O-W (includes Admin)156,300 - - 156,300 - - 25,000 131,300 - - Construction 1,804,160 - - 1,804,160 - - - 1,804,160 - - Construction Services 654,470 - - 654,470 - - - 654,470 - - Post Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenses 3,137,900 - - 3,137,900 - - 299,035 2,838,865 - - Resources: Vehicle Fuel Tax - - - - - - - - - - Business & Occupation Share - - - - - - - - - - Fund Balance - - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (1)- - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (2)- - - - - - - - - - Mitigation - - - - - - - - - - Bonds / LID's Formed - - - - - - - - - - Other (1)- - - - - - - - - - Other (2)- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Undetermined 3,137,900 - - 3,137,900 - - 299,035 2,838,865 - - Total Sources 3,137,900 - - 3,137,900 - - 299,035 2,838,865 - - - 3,137,900 Project Expenditures & Resources Programmed Programmed Pre-2019 Six-Year Program Maple Valley Highway Barriers 317 Chris Barnes 425-430-7220 This project includes two barriers: One is to install a concrete median barrier between east and westbound travel lanes of the SR 169 S-Curve between the Riviera Apartments and S. 5th Street including associated roadway widening to add the barrier. The second barrier improvement will remove the existing concrete barrier end treatment located eastbound (east of the Riviera Apartments) and replace with 2 new concrete barriers extending west. Maple Valley Highway (SR 169) is a principal arterial carrying 44,000 vehicles per day. This project will improve safety for traffic on Maple Valley Highway (SR 169) at this location, which has been the site to numerous collision impacts. The design report for the Cedar River half bridge is complete and was funded by the Roadway Safety and Guardrail Program (TIP # 4). Final design and construction pending funding availability. 61 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019 - 2024 TIP No. 35 Project Title:Monster Road SW/68th Ave S Roadway Improvements Community Planning Area:Valley Fund: Functional Classification:N/A Project: Project Length:0.92 mi Contact: Project Description: Justification: Status: Changes: Funded:Unfunded: Pre-2018 2018 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Expenditures: Planning 50,000 - - 50,000 - - - - 50,000 - Preliminary Engineering 5,000,000 - - 5,000,000 - - - - - 5,000,000 R-O-W (includes Admin)3,000,000 - - 3,000,000 - - - - - 3,000,000 Construction - - - - - - - - - - Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Post Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenses 8,050,000 - - 8,050,000 - - - - 50,000 8,000,000 Resources: Vehicle Fuel Tax - - - - - - - - - - Business & Occupation Share - - - - - - - - - - Fund Balance - - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (1)- - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (2)- - - - - - - - - - Mitigation - - - - - - - - - - Bonds / LID's Formed - - - - - - - - - - Other (1)- - - - - - - - - - Other (2)- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Undetermined 8,050,000 - - 8,050,000 - - - - 50,000 8,000,000 Total Sources 8,050,000 - - 8,050,000 - - - - 50,000 8,000,000 - 8,050,000 Project Expenditures & Resources Programmed Programmed Pre-2019 Six-Year Program Monster Road SW/68th Ave S Roadway Improvements 317 Vangie Garcia 425-430-7319 Widen existing roadway to four lanes plus two-way-left-turn-lane where needed and bike lanes. Realign Beacon Coal Mine Road approach to intersection with the Monster Road SW roadway. Includes new roadway, curbs, sidewalk, drainage, street lighting, traffic signals, channelization, retaining walls and widening the existing bridge. Will serve growing north-south traffic demand. A preliminary design study was completed in 1999. The project cost is estimated at $32M, with the City's share estimated at $13M and King Co. at $19M. Phase 1 of improvements will address drainage problems between the Monster Rd Bridge and the City limits. Scope, cost and implementation schedule to be determined. Project is pending future grant funding availability. Cost beyond 2024 not shown. 62 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019 - 2024 TIP No. 36 Project Title:NE 3rd Street/NE 4th Street Corridor Improvements Community Planning Area:Highlands & East Plateau Fund: Functional Classification:Principal Project: Project Length:2.2 mi Contact: Project Description: Justification: Status: Changes: Funded:Unfunded: Pre-2018 2018 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Expenditures: Planning 258,420 218,420 - 40,000 20,000 20,000 - - - - Preliminary Engineering 2,276,917 776,917 - 1,500,000 - - 750,000 750,000 - - R-O-W (includes Admin)684,024 84,024 - 600,000 - - - 600,000 - - Construction 10,816,803 2,316,803 - 8,500,000 - - - 2,500,000 4,500,000 1,500,000 Construction Services 3,042,921 322,921 - 2,720,000 - - - 340,000 680,000 1,700,000 Post Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenses 17,079,085 3,719,085 - 13,360,000 20,000 20,000 750,000 4,190,000 5,180,000 3,200,000 Resources: Vehicle Fuel Tax - - - - - - - - - - Business & Occupation Share 462,831 422,831 - 40,000 20,000 20,000 - - - - Fund Balance 1,024,433 1,024,433 - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (TIB)1,495,542 1,495,542 - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (2)- - - - - - - - - - Mitigation 373,700 373,700 - - - - - - - - Bonds / LID's Formed - - - - - - - - - - Other (KC WD#90)352,541 352,541 - - - - - - - - Other (Franchise Reimb)50,038 50,038 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Undetermined 13,320,000 - - 13,320,000 - 750,000 4,190,000 5,180,000 3,200,000 Total Sources 17,079,085 3,719,085 - 13,360,000 20,000 20,000 750,000 4,190,000 5,180,000 3,200,000 3,759,085 13,320,000 Project Expenditures & Resources Programmed Programmed Pre-2019 Six-Year Program NE 3rd Street/NE 4th Street Corridor Improvements The estimated cost for all corridor improvements (Sunset Blvd N to the east City limits) is $46M. Programmed expenses (2021-2024) are placeholders for future phases. Programmed expenses in 2019-2020 are for developing scope, cost and schedule for next phases. Future phases are pending future grant funding availability. Increased estimated costs from previous TIP for inflation. 317 122176 Keith Woolley 425-430-7318 This project involves a series of improvements in this corridor to improve traffic operations such as rechannelization and traffic signal modifications, possible transit priority signal treatments and queue jumps. This project will seek to meet pedestrian, transit and bicycle needs. Phase 1 constructed a new signal and other improvements at NE 4th St and Whitman Ave NE. This corridor has a strong potential for transit usage and is experiencing rapid residential and retail growth. The NE 3rd/4th Corridor Study was adopted in May 2005. The study refined the corridor transportation needs and costs, including pedestrian, transit, bicycle improvements, as well as streetscape enhancement. 63 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019 - 2024 TIP No. 37 Project Title:Nile Ave NE Bridge Replacement Community Planning Area:East Plateau Fund: Functional Classification:N/A Project: Project Length:N/A Contact: Project Description: Justification: Status: Changes: Funded:Unfunded: Pre-2018 2018 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Expenditures: Planning - - - - - - - - - - Preliminary Engineering 250,000 - - 250,000 - 50,000 200,000 - - - R-O-W (includes Admin)- - - - - - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Post Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenses 250,000 - - 250,000 - 50,000 200,000 - - - Resources: Vehicle Fuel Tax - - - - - - - - - - Business & Occupation Share 50,000 - - 50,000 - 50,000 - - - - Fund Balance - - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (1)- - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (2)- - - - - - - - - - Mitigation - - - - - - - - - - Bonds / LID's Formed - - - - - - - - - - Other (1)- - - - - - - - - - Other (2)- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Undetermined 200,000 - - 200,000 - - 200,000 - - - Total Sources 250,000 - - 250,000 - 50,000 200,000 - - - 50,000 200,000 Project Expenditures & Resources Programmed Programmed Pre-2019 Six-Year Program Nile Ave NE Bridge Replacement 317 NEW Derek Akesson 425-430-7337 The Nile Ave NE Bridge was built by King County in 1951. Ownership was transferred to the City in 2009 as part of the MacKay Annexation (Ord #5456). It is a single span bridge that crosses over May Creek. The initial phase of this project will evaluate replacement options with a type, size and location (TS&L) study. The bridge is 17 years beyond its original design life of 50 years. It will very likely need to be replaced or significantly retrofitted within the next 10 years. The main span is comprised of precast concrete girders. The girders are supported on treated timber piles with a timber caps. Some of the timber piles are showing signs of deterioration. New project. To date the project has not received grant funding for replacement. However, with a TS&L study, the City will be in a very good position to apply for Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) funding when the bridge condition qualifies for replacement funding. 64 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019 - 2024 TIP No. 38 Project Title:Rainier Ave N Corridor Improvements (Phase 5) Community Planning Area:City Center Fund: Functional Classification:N/A Project: Project Length:0.76 mi Contact: Project Description: Justification: Status: Changes: Funded:Unfunded: Pre-2018 2018 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Expenditures: Planning 100,000 - - 100,000 - - - - 100,000 - Preliminary Engineering 2,000,000 - - 2,000,000 - - - - - 2,000,000 R-O-W (includes Admin)- - - - - - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Post Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenses 2,100,000 - - 2,100,000 - - - - 100,000 2,000,000 Resources: Vehicle Fuel Tax - - - - - - - - - - Business & Occupation Share - - - - - - - - - - Fund Balance - - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (1)- - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (2)- - - - - - - - - - Mitigation - - - - - - - - - - Bonds / LID's Formed - - - - - - - - - - Other (1)- - - - - - - - - - Other (2)- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Undetermined 2,100,000 - - 2,100,000 - - - - 100,000 2,000,000 Total Sources 2,100,000 - - 2,100,000 - - - - 100,000 2,000,000 - 2,100,000 Project Expenditures & Resources Programmed Programmed Pre-2019 Six-Year Program Rainier Ave N Corridor Improvements (Phase 5) 317 Vangie Garcia 425-430-7319 This is Phase 5 of the Rainier Ave Corridor Improvements, and will extend the improvements from NW 3rd Pl to north City limits. Project elements include widening of sidewalks with streetscaping, adding pedestrian-scale illumination and planted buffer strips. The street may be narrowed from 5 to 3 lanes where feasible. On the east side of Rainier Ave the new multi-use trail will be installed (Lake Washington Loop Trail), (as shown on TIP #18). Rainier Ave is a critical corridor in Renton with existing operational problems and in need of infrastructure enhancements to provide greater ease for non-motorized and transit- based travel. Funds shown in 2023 are for planning to determine the roadway cross section. Project cost estimated at $31.5M and is unfunded. Costs beyond 2024 not shown. 65 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019 - 2024 TIP No. 39 Project Title:Renton Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Improvements Community Planning Area:City Center Fund: Functional Classification:TBD Project: Project Length:TBD Contact: Project Description: Justification: Status: Changes: Funded:Unfunded: Pre-2018 2018 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Expenditures: Planning - - - - - - - - - - Preliminary Engineering - - - - - - - - - - R-O-W (includes Admin)- - - - - - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Post Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Other 21,300,000 - - 21,300,000 - - - 3,195,000 9,052,500 9,052,500 Total Expenses 21,300,000 - - 21,300,000 - - - 3,195,000 9,052,500 9,052,500 Resources: Vehicle Fuel Tax - - - - - - - - - - Business & Occupation Share - - - - - - - - - - Fund Balance - - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (1)- - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded(2)- - - - - - - - - - Mitigation - - - - - - - - - - Bonds / LID's Formed - - - - - - - - - - Other (1)- - - - - - - - - - Other (2)- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Undetermined 21,300,000 - - 21,300,000 - - - 3,195,000 9,052,500 9,052,500 Total Sources 21,300,000 - - 21,300,000 - - - 3,195,000 9,052,500 9,052,500 Renton Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Improvements - 21,300,000 Project Expenditures & Resources Programmed Programmed Pre-2019 Six-Year Program 317 NEW Vangie Garcia 425-430-7319 New transit access road improvements from I-405 exit 3 (Talbot Rd) to South Renton Transit Center. Includes reconfiguration of Grady Way, Lake Ave S and S Renton Village Place to accommodate transit. With current traffic conditions and configurations, improvements will be needed to ensure speed and reliability of the BRT system into and out of the South Renton Transit Center. This transit hub is currently and will remain a key connection point for transit users for both Metro and Sound Transit. Proximity to the Sounder Station and future increase of parking availability also plays a key role in improvement accessibility needs. New Project. Estimated cost in Regional Transportation Plan is $21,300,000. Design and Construction should be implemented and coordinated with South Renton Transit Center, development of Renton Village, and implementation of I-405 Bus Rapid Transit. 66 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019 - 2024 TIP No. 40 Project Title:Transit Master Plan Community Planning Area:Citywide Fund: Functional Classification:N/A Project: Project Length:N/A Contact: Project Description: Justification: Status: Changes: Funded:Unfunded: Pre-2018 2018 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Expenditures: Planning 500,000 - - 500,000 - - 300,000 200,000 - - Preliminary Engineering - - - - - - - - - - R-O-W (includes Admin)- - - - - - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Post Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenses 500,000 - - 500,000 - - 300,000 200,000 - - Resources: Vehicle Fuel Tax - - - - - - - - - - Business & Occupation Share - - - - - - - - - - Fund Balance - - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (1)- - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (2)- - - - - - - - - - Mitigation - - - - - - - - - - Bonds / LID's Formed - - - - - - - - - - Other (1)- - - - - - - - - - Other (2)- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Undetermined 500,000 - - 500,000 - - 300,000 200,000 - - Total Sources 500,000 - - 500,000 - - 300,000 200,000 - - - 500,000 Project Expenditures & Resources Programmed Programmed Pre-2019 Six-Year Program Transit Master Plan 317 NEW Vangie Garcia 425-430-7319 The Transit Master Plan provides the city with a means to influence decisions made by regional transit authorities. It also provides a basis on which to begin advancing proposed capital projects for further study, design and prioritization, and position them to be strong competitors for grant funding. The plan establishes scalable short- and long-term strategies, and identifies projects that will foster a high-quality transit system to meet Renton’s needs. Although the City does not operate its own transit service, the role of transit in Renton is evolving and becoming more of a priority in the region. The current regional vision allows cities and other urban service providers prioritized maximizing the use of existing infrastructure, making more efficient and less costly investments in new infrastructure, and minimizing the environmental impact of urban growth. This prioritization made transportation a key role in the region by creating improved accessibility and mobility for walking, biking, and transit. Regional growth centers are envisioned as major focal points of higher density population and employment, served with efficient multimodal transportation infrastructure and services. Linking these centers with a highly efficient transportation system allows the region to take actions to reduce the rate of growth in vehicle miles traveled, especially by providing and expanding transportation choices. New project. 67 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019 - 2024 TIP No. 41 Project Title:South 3rd Street Conversion Project Community Planning Area:City Center Fund: Functional Classification:Principal Project: Project Length:N/A Contact: Project Description: Justification: Status: Changes: Funded:Unfunded: Pre-2018 2018 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Expenditures: Planning - - - - - - - - - - Preliminary Engineering 4,000,000 - - 4,000,000 - - 4,000,000 - - - R-O-W (includes Admin)- - - - - - - - - - Construction 13,200,000 - - 13,200,000 - - - 5,000,000 8,200,000 - Construction Services 4,000,000 - - 4,000,000 - - - 1,500,000 2,500,000 - Post Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenses 21,200,000 - - 21,200,000 - - 4,000,000 6,500,000 10,700,000 - Resources: Vehicle Fuel Tax - - - - - - - - - - Business & Occupation Share - - - - - - - - - - Fund Balance - - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (1)- - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded(2)- - - - - - - - - - Mitigation - - - - - - - - - - Bonds / LID's Formed - - - - - - - - - - Other (1)- - - - - - - - - - Other (2)- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Undetermined 21,200,000 - - 21,200,000 - - 4,000,000 6,500,000 10,700,000 - Total Sources 21,200,000 - - 21,200,000 - - 4,000,000 6,500,000 10,700,000 - South 3rd Street Conversion Project - 21,200,000 Project Expenditures & Resources Programmed Programmed Pre-2019 Six-Year Program 317 Vangie Garcia 425-430-7319 The project provides pedestrian and bicyclists facilities and enhancements, traffic operation and circulation improvements in Downtown. The improvements include adding raised intersections with bulb outs, parklets, pedestrian plaza, lighting, street furniture, streetscape, bicycle blvd, bike racks, signage, wayfinding and converting S 3rd St to two-way operations. This project is one of the strategies identified in the City Center Community Plan. The project enhances downtown Renton as a destination area, while improving circulation, reducing traffic speeds and enhancing pedestrian safety. A feasibility study, including a Downtown Circulation Traffic Analysis for the conversion to two-way operations was completed. This is the last project of the Downtown Conversion to a two-way operations. It will continue the downtown improvements, further enhancing the pedestrian and bicyclists environment. Project is pending future grant funding availability. 68 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019 - 2024 TIP No. 42 Project Title:S/SW 7th Street Corridor Improvements - Naches Ave S to Talbot Road S Community Planning Area:City Center Fund: Functional Classification:Minor Arterial Project: Project Length:1.16 mi Contact: Project Description: Justification: Status: Changes: Funded:Unfunded: Pre-2018 2018 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Expenditures: Planning 32,270 32,270 - - - - - - - - Preliminary Engineering 2,311,842 311,842 - 2,000,000 - - 200,000 800,000 1,000,000 - R-O-W (includes Admin)1,725,124 25,124 - 1,700,000 - - - 800,000 900,000 Construction 11,362,668 975,141 14,599 10,372,928 - - - - 7,264,000 3,108,928 Construction Services 1,999,882 299,882 - 1,700,000 - - - - 1,200,000 500,000 Post Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenses 17,431,786 1,644,259 14,599 15,772,928 - - 200,000 1,600,000 10,364,000 3,608,928 Resources: Vehicle Fuel Tax - - - - - - - - - - Business & Occupation Share 52,115 52,115 - - - - - - - - Fund Balance + Reserve 72,164 60,401 11,763 - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (STP)497,241 494,405 2,836 - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (TIB)613,338 613,338 - - - - - - - - Mitigation 424,000 424,000 - - - - - - - - Bonds / LID's Formed - - - - - - - - - - Other (1)- - - - - - - - - - Other (2)- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Undetermined 15,772,928 - - 15,772,928 - - 200,000 1,600,000 10,364,000 3,608,928 Total Sources 17,431,786 1,644,259 14,599 15,772,928 - - 200,000 1,600,000 10,364,000 3,608,928 1,658,858 15,772,928 Project Expenditures & Resources Programmed Programmed Pre-2019 Six-Year Program S/SW 7th Street Corridor Improvements - Naches Ave S to Talbot Road S Added costs for the SW 7th St Sidepath. It is assumed that no ROW would be required. 317 122151 Vangie Garcia 425-430-7319 Widening the existing S 7th St from Talbot Road S to Rainier Ave S roadway to 3 lanes (2 lanes EB and 1 lane WB) and a separated multi-use trail. Includes new curb, gutter, wider sidewalks, street lighting, landscaping, channelization and upgrades to traffic signals. The S 7th St Project - Traffic Analysis Report provided alternatives for corridor improvement options. This project also includes a sidepath on SW 7th St between Rainier Ave S and Naches Ave S. The segment of the S 7th St corridor connects Talbot Rd S (SR 515) with Rainier Ave S (SR 167). The segment of S 7th St is part of a designated east-west ped/bike route through the City's commercial core and an important link between regional trails. The South Renton Neighborhood Study has identified South 7th St as needing streetscape improvements. The Trails and Bicycle Master Plan Update identified SW 7th St/S 7th St as a good alternate/parallel route as the L2S Trail (TIP #30) is developed. With the expansion of the South Renton Transit Center and Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) implementation, S 7th St is important non-motorized link to downtown core. Costs incurred are for Phase 1, which added a traffic signal and an eastbound right-turn lane at the intersection of S 7th St and Shattuck Ave S. Project is pending future grant funding availability. 69 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019 - 2024 TIP No. 43 Project Title:South Grady Way - Talbot Rd South to Rainier Ave South Community Planning Area:City Center Fund: Functional Classification:N/A Project: Project Length:N/A Contact: Project Description: Justification: Status: Changes: Funded:Unfunded: Pre-2018 2018 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Expenditures: Planning - - - - - - - - - - Preliminary Engineering 750,000 - - 750,000 - - 550,000 200,000 - - R-O-W (includes Admin)- - - - - - - - - - Construction 2,500,000 - - 2,500,000 - - - 1,200,000 1,300,000 - Construction Services 750,000 - - 750,000 - - - 360,000 390,000 - Post Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenses 4,000,000 - - 4,000,000 - - 550,000 1,760,000 1,690,000 - Resources: Vehicle Fuel Tax - - - - - - - - - - Business & Occupation Share - - - - - - - - - - Fund Balance - - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (1)- - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (2)- - - - - - - - - - Mitigation - - - - - - - - - - Bonds / LID's Formed - - - - - - - - - - Other (1)- - - - - - - - - - Other (2)- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Undetermined 4,000,000 - - 4,000,000 - - 550,000 1,760,000 1,690,000 - Total Sources 4,000,000 - - 4,000,000 - - 550,000 1,760,000 1,690,000 - - 4,000,000 Project Expenditures & Resources Programmed Programmed Pre-2019 Six-Year Program South Grady Way - Talbot Rd South to Rainier Ave South 317 Vangie Garcia 425-430-7319 This project will perform a comprehensive analysis of multi-modal transportation improvements, including review of potential transit improvements along Grady Way, such as Business Access and Transit (BAT) lanes and Traffic Signal Priority (TSP). The project will remove the islands at the intersections of S Grady Way with Lake Ave S and Shattuck Ave S, to allow for a continuous eastbound lane from Rainier Ave S to Talbot Rd S. Included are modifications to the traffic signal, new pedestrian crossings and channelization. The improvements will add much needed capacity to the S Grady Way corridor. Project is pending future grant funding availability. 70 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019 - 2024 TIP No. 44 Project Title:South Lake Washington Transit Stop Community Planning Area:City Center Fund: Functional Classification:N/A Project: Project Length:N/A Contact: Project Description: Justification: Status: Changes: Funded:Unfunded: Pre-2018 2018 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Expenditures: Planning - - - - - - - - - - Preliminary Engineering 600,000 - - 600,000 - - 600,000 - - - R-O-W (includes Admin)- - - - - - - - - - Construction 3,000,000 - - 3,000,000 - - 3,000,000 - - - Construction Services 750,000 - - 750,000 - - 750,000 - - - Post Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenses 4,350,000 - - 4,350,000 - - 4,350,000 - - - Resources: Vehicle Fuel Tax - - - - - - - - - - Business & Occupation Share - - - - - - - - - - Fund Balance - - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (1)- - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (2)- - - - - - - - - - Mitigation - - - - - - - - - - Bonds / LID's Formed - - - - - - - - - - Other (1)- - - - - - - - - - Other (2)- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Undetermined 4,350,000 - - 4,350,000 - - 4,350,000 - - - Total Sources 4,350,000 - - 4,350,000 - - 4,350,000 - - - - 4,350,000 Project Expenditures & Resources Programmed Programmed Pre-2019 Six-Year Program South Lake Washington Transit Stop 317 Vangie Garcia 425-430-7319 This project will implement a Bus Transit Station at Park Ave. N and Garden Ave N. The project includes a new transit stop, with passenger amenities such as shelters, lighting, benches, litter receptacles, bicycle racks and lockers. The project is proposed to meet recent travel demand growth in the area and as a part of the connectivity of the regional transit system. This transit hub will provide service to a 17.5 acre mixed use site consisting of 730,000 sq.ft. of office space, 43,000 sq.ft. of meeting space, 30,000 sq.ft. of retail, 383 apartment units and a 347 unit hotel. Other new development in the area includes two hotels. In addition, a large manufacturing company's employees will benefit from the transit hub's location as well as visitors to The Landing and the 57 acre Gene Coulon Park. The preliminary planning for this transit project will be incorporated into the N Park Ave Extension Project (TIP #20). 71 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019 - 2024 TIP No. 45 Project Title:Sunset Area Green Connections Community Planning Area:Highlands Fund: Functional Classification:N/A Project: Project Length:N/A Contact: Project Description: Justification: Status: Changes: Funded:Unfunded: Pre-2018 2018 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Expenditures: Planning - - - - - - - - - - Preliminary Engineering 2,600,000 - - 2,600,000 - - - 2,600,000 - - R-O-W (includes Admin)1,000,000 - - 1,000,000 - - - 1,000,000 - - Construction 16,000,000 - - 16,000,000 - - - - 9,200,000 6,800,000 Construction Services 2,600,000 - - 2,600,000 - - - - 1,500,000 1,100,000 Post Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenses 22,200,000 - - 22,200,000 - - - 3,600,000 10,700,000 7,900,000 Resources: Vehicle Fuel Tax - - - - - - - - - - Business & Occupation Share - - - - - - - - - - Fund Balance - - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (1)- - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (2)- - - - - - - - - - Mitigation - - - - - - - - - - Bonds / LID's Formed - - - - - - - - - - Other (CED)- - - - - - - - - - Other (2)- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Undetermined 22,200,000 - - 22,200,000 - - - 3,600,000 10,700,000 7,900,000 Total Sources 22,200,000 - - 22,200,000 - - - 3,600,000 10,700,000 7,900,000 - 22,200,000 Project Expenditures & Resources Programmed Programmed Pre-2019 Six-Year Program Sunset Area Green Connections 317 Vangie Garcia 425-430-7319 This project will construct multi-modal improvements identified in the Sunset Area Community Planned Action Study. Roadways will be widened/extended/realigned to provide for future traffic flows. Several residential streets will be developed as "green connections" improving pedestrian mobility and enhance the neighborhood. Roadways included are NE 10th St, NE Sunset Lane, Harrington Ave NE, NE 12th St, Edmonds Ave NE, Jefferson Ave NE, Kirkland Ave NE and Glennwood Ave NE. Improvements to these streets are key to support the redevelopment of the Sunset Area Community in the Highlands area, bounded by NE 21st St on the north, Edmonds Ave NE on the west, NE 7th St on the south, and Monroe Ave NE on the east. The City in partnership with the Renton Housing Authority aspires to redevelop the Sunset Terrace public housing community and encourage private delopment in the Planned Action Study area over a 20-year period. The total cost of the project is estimated at $22.2M. Schedule, cost and selection of streets to be improved to be determined. Significant cost participation will be required from development. Surface Water is leading this project and has completed two projects along Harrington Ave NE. 72 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019 - 2024 TIP No. 46 Project Title:SW 27th Street/Strander Boulevard Connection Community Planning Area:Valley Fund: Functional Classification:Minor Arterial Project: Project Length:1.27 mi Contact: Project Description: Justification: Status: Changes: Funded:Unfunded: Pre-2018 2018 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Expenditures: Planning - - - - - - - - - - Preliminary Engineering 5,030,912 5,030,912 - - - - - - - - R-O-W (includes Admin)3,842,563 3,842,563 - - - - - - - - Construction 16,798,111 16,748,111 50,000 - - - - - - - Construction Services 2,435,829 2,435,829 - - - - - - - - Post Construction Services 3,009,442 3,009,442 - - - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenses 31,116,857 31,066,857 50,000 - - - - - - - Resources: Vehicle Fuel Tax - - - - - - - - - - Interfund Loan 700,000 700,000 - - - - - - - - Gen & Prop Fund Balances 2,638,698 2,588,698 50,000 - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (State & Fed 2,408,422 2,408,422 - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (FMSIB)7,697,425 7,697,425 - - - - - - - - Mitigation 1,413,835 1,413,835 - - - - - - - - Bonds / LID's Formed 2,799,500 2,799,500 - - - - - - - - Other (Sound Transit & FRB)4,687,421 4,687,421 - - - - - - - - Other (STP & TIB)7,346,536 7,346,536 - - - - - - - - City of Tukwila Reimburse 1,000,000 1,000,000 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PW Utilities (Water/Surf Wat)425,020 425,020 - - - - - - - - Undetermined - - - - - - - - - - Total Sources 31,116,857 31,066,857 50,000 - - - - - - - SW 27th Street/Strander Boulevard Connection 29,691,837 - Project Expenditures & Resources Programmed Programmed Pre-2019 Six-Year Program The City of Tukwila has taken the lead for future phases. 317 122239, 122240 Keith Woolley 425-430-7318 The project will provide a grade-separated crossing at the Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) and Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) railroad tracks. Bicycle and pedestrian connections will be provided to the Tukwila Station and the Interurban Trail. Phase 1 - Seg 2a - 2 lane roadway from Naches Ave SW to the Sounder Station, including a BNSF bridge is completed. This project provides a critical four/five-lane arterial that will serve as a connector to West Valley Highway (SR 181) and East Valley Road, as well as an arterial connector to SR 167 from the south. A new east-west arterial roadway will connect the cities of Renton and Tukwila and provide significant congestion relief to existing arterials. The new road will provide access to the Tukwila Train/Sound Transit Station. The new grade separated arterial (UPRR and BNSF railroads) will provide significant benefits to both freight mobility and general motorists. 73 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019 - 2024 TIP No. 47 Project Title:Talbot Road S / S 177th Street Signalization & Roadway Improvements Community Planning Area:Talbot Fund: Functional Classification:Major Collector Project: Project Length:N/A Contact: Project Description: Justification: Status: Changes: Funded:Unfunded: Pre-2018 2018 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Expenditures: Planning - - - - - - - - - - Preliminary Engineering - - - - - - - - - - R-O-W (includes Admin)- - - - - - - - - - Construction 1,000,000 - 1,000,000 - - - - - - - Construction Services 25,000 - 25,000 - - - - - - - Post Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenses 1,025,000 - 1,025,000 - - - - - - - Resources: Vehicle Fuel Tax - - - - - - - - - - Business & Occupation Share - - - - - - - - - - Fund Balance - - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (1)- - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (2)- - - - - - - - - - Mitigation - - - - - - - - - - Bonds / LID's Formed - - - - - - - - - - Other (Dev. Expenditure)1,025,000 - 1,025,000 - - - - - - - Other (Dev. Reimb)- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Undetermined - - - - - - - - - - Total Sources 1,025,000 - 1,025,000 - - - - - - - Talbot Road S / S 177th Street Signalization & Roadway Improvements 1,025,000 - Project Expenditures & Resources Programmed Programmed Pre-2019 Six-Year Program 317 Vangie Garcia 425-430-7319 This project involves installing a traffic signal and various roadway improvements including meeting pedestrian transit and bicycle needs. This project is proposed to meet recent traffic demand through this intersection and surrounding area as a result of the expansion of Valley Medical Center. The project is currently in design and will be starting construction in 2018 once they receive an approved permit. 74 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) Section F Appendix 2019 – 2024 Transportation Improvement Program 75 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) City of Renton | 2019 - 2024 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 25 Abbreviations and Acronyms The following list defines the abbreviated words and/or acronyms used in the City of Renton’s Six -Year Transportatfon Improvement Program. ACP Asphalt Concrete Pavement ADA American Disability Act BAT Business Access Transit BNSF Burlington Northern Santa Fe BRAC Bridge Replacement Advisory Committee CBD Central Business District CIP Capital Improvement Program CMAQ Congestfon Mitfgatfon and Air Quality CTR Commute Trip Reductfon (State Act) DOE Department of Ecology EB Eastbound ECL East City Limits EIS Environmental Impact Study ER Emergency Relief FHWA Federal Highway Administratfon FMSIB Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board GIS Geographic Informatfon System GMA Growth Management Act HOV High Occupancy Vehicles ITS Intelligent Transportatfon System LF Linear Feet LID Local Improvement District LOS Level of Service MAP-21 Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act METRO Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle MOU Memorandum of Understanding MUTCD Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices NCL North City Limits NB Northbound PMS Pavement Management System Precon Preconstructfon Engineering/Administratfon (design phase of project) PS&E Plans, Specificatfons, and Estfmates ROW Right-of-way RTA Regional Transit Authority SB Southbound SCATBd South County Area Transportatfon Board SCL South City Limits SOV Single Occupant Vehicle ST Sound Transit STP Surface Transportatfon Program TDM Transportatfon Demand Management Program TIB Transportatfon Improvement Board TIP Transportatfon Improvement Plan UPRR Union Pacific Railroad UPS Uninterruptfble Power Supple WB Westbound WCL West City Limits WSBIS Washington State Bridge Inventory System WSDOT Washington State Department of Transportatfon 76 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) 1  CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON    RESOLUTION NO. ________    A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, UPDATING AND  EXTENDING RENTON’S SIX‐YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM  FOR 2019 – 2024.     WHEREAS, the City of Renton has adopted a Six‐Year Transportation Improvement  Program (“TIP”) pursuant to RCW 35.77.010 (Perpetual advanced six‐year plans for coordinated  transportation program expenditures), and the TIP has been updated, amended and modified  from time to time as authorized and required by law; and   WHEREAS, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing on August 20, 2018,  for the  purpose of considering updates to the TIP; and   WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the work accomplished under the TIP,  considered any public testimony given at the public hearing held on August 20, 2018, considered  proposed updates to the TIP, and determined current City transportation needs;   NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO  RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:   SECTION I. The City of Renton’s 2019‐2024 Six‐Year Transportation Improvement  Program, attached as Exhibit A and fully incorporated herein by this reference, is adopted as the  City’s updated and extended TIP.     SECTION II. The updated and extended TIP, as attached, shall be and constitute  Renton’s 2019‐2024 Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program for purposes of compliance  with RCW 35.77.010, and shall remain in full force and effect until further revised, amended, and  modified as provided by law.  AGENDA ITEM #7. k) RESOLUTION NO. ________  2   SECTION III. The Administrator of the Public Works Department and the City Clerk are  authorized and directed to file this resolution, together with Exhibit A, with the Washington State  Secretary of Transportation within 30 days of its adoption.  PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this ____ day of _________________, 2018.                             Jason A. Seth, City Clerk    APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this ____ day of ___________________, 2018.                              Denis Law, Mayor    Approved as to form:              Shane Moloney, City Attorney    RES.1774:7/26/18:scr  AGENDA ITEM #7. k)               EXHIBIT A      2019 – 2024   TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM  AGENDA ITEM #7. k) Transportation Improvement Program 2019—2024 | Six-Year Adopted August 2018 Department of Public Works Transportation Systems Division AGENDA ITEM #7. k) Acknowledgements Mayor Denis Law City Council Ed Prince, Council President Don Persson, Council President Pro-tem Randy Corman Ryan McIrvin Armondo Pavone Ruth Pérez Don Persson Carol Ann Witschi Chief Administrative Officer Robert Harrison Public Works Gregg Zimmerman, Public Works Administrator Jim Seitz, Transportatfon Systems Director Vangie Garcia, Transportatfon Planning & Programming Manager Bob Hanson, Transportatfon Design Manager Chris Barnes, Transportatfon Operatfons Manager Eric Cutshall, Transportatfon Maintenance Manager Heather Gregersen, Program Development Coordinator 2019 – 2024 Transportation Improvement Program 1 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) Table of Contents Section A – Introduction Purpose of the Transportatfon Improvement Program 4 Renton Business Plan 5 Section B – Map and Location Transportatfon Improvement Program Map 8 Map Index 9 Section C – Development and Prioritization TIP Development Actfvitfes 11 General Programming Criteria 13 Summary of Projects and Prioritfzatfon 15 Section D – Expenditures and Revenues Funding Sources - Itemized 19 Section E – Project Descriptions Detailed Project Descriptfons 26 Section F – Appendix Abbreviatfons and Acronyms Resolutfon to Adopt Six-Year 2019-2024 TIP 2019 – 2024 Transportation Improvement Program 2 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) Section A Introduction 2019 – 2024 Transportation Improvement Program 3 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) City of Renton | 2019 - 2024 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Purpose of the Transportation Improvement Program The purpose of this document is to update the City of Renton’s future plans for transportatfon improvement programs and projects. This document is Renton’s comprehensive transportatfon program for the ensuing six calendar years and is mandated by the Revised Code of Washington and Washington Administratfve Code. The Transportatfon Improvement Program (TIP) is a multf-year planning tool for the development of transportatfon facilitfes within the City that: support the Mission and Vision of the City of Renton help achieve the goals of the Renton Business Plan reflect the involvement of City Citfzens and Elected Officials. The Transportatfon Improvement Program is a vital part of planning under the Growth Management Act and city projects must be included in the TIP to be eligible for state and federal grant programs. The Transportatfon Systems Division uses the TIP to coordinate projects and programs with other jurisdictfons and agencies. 4 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) Provide a safe, healthy, vibrant community Promote safety, health, and security through effective communication and service delivery Facilitate successful neighborhoods through community involvement Encourage and partner in the development of quality housing choices for people of all ages and income levels Promote a walkable, pedestrian and bicycle- friendly city with complete streets, trails, and connections between neighborhoods and community focal points Provide opportunities for communities to be better prepared for emergencies Promote economic vitality and strategically position Renton for the future Promote Renton as the progressive, opportunity- rich city in the Puget Sound region Capitalize on opportunities through bold and creative economic development strategies Recruit and retain businesses to ensure a dynamic, diversified employment base Nurture entrepreneurship and foster successful partnerships with businesses and community leaders Leverage public/ private resources to focus development on economic centers Support planned growth and influence decisions that impact the city Foster development of vibrant, sustainable, attractive, mixed-use neighborhoods in urban centers Uphold a high standard of design and property maintenance Advocate Renton’s interests through state and federal lobbying efforts, regional partnerships and other organizations Pursue transportation and other regional improvements and services that improve quality of life Balance development with environmental protection Building an inclusive informed city with opportunities for all Improve access to city services, programs and employment, and make residents and businesses aware of opportunities to be involved with their community Build connections with ALL communities that reflect the breadth and richness of the diversity in our city Promote understanding and appreciation of our diversity through celebrations and festivals Provide critical and relevant information on a timely basis and facilitate two-way dialogue between city government and the community Meet service demands and provide high quality customer service Plan, develop, and maintain quality services, infrastructure, and amenities Prioritize services at levels that can be sustained by revenue Retain a skilled workforce by making Renton the municipal employer of choice Develop and maintain collaborative partnerships and investment strategies that improve services Respond to growing service demands through partnerships, innovation, and outcome management Renton Business Plan 2019–2024 GOALS The City of Renton, in partnership and communication with residents, businesses, and schools, is dedicated to:MISSION Providing a safe, healthy, welcoming atmosphere where people choose to live Promoting economic vitality and strategically positioning Renton for the future Supporting planned growth and influencing decisions that impact the city Building an inclusive informed city with opportunities for all Meeting service demands through high quality customer service, innovation, a positive work environment, and a commitment to excellence Renton: The center of opportunity in the Puget Sound Region where families and businesses thrive VISION RENTON. AHEAD OF THE CURVE. 5 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) Section B Map and Location 2019 – 2024 Transportation Improvement Program 6 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) City of Renton | 2019 - 2024 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Map and Location This sectfon contains a list of all the projects listed in the 2019 - 2024 Transportatfon Improvement Program (TIP), listed by TIP number. The TIP project numbering system starts with programmatfc actfvitfes that typically have annual financial allocatfons. With this in mind, the TIP numbers for these programs will remain the same for future TIPs. The next grouping of projects in alphabetfcal order are projects with full or partfal funding secured, such as with federal or state grants or developer contributfons, or where the City has a financial commitment to implementfng within the six-year period. The last group of projects, where the projects start over in alphabetfcal order, are unfunded local projects or outside agency-led projects, that have been identffied in other long-range plans for the City. INTERACTIVE ONLINE MAP In additfon to having a map index to the map of 2019-2024 TIP projects, there is an interactfve online map where a user can click on a specific project and a dialog box opens with informatfon about that project with a link to the individual TIP sheet. The web address is: http://www.rentonwa.gov/TIPMap 7 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) City of Renton | 2019 - 2024 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2.1 38 18 35 32 2.2 21 24 26 25 15 17 37 20 41 31 29 19 45 16 36 34 47 23 27 30 28 22 42 33 46 43 39 Maintenance and Preservatfon Corridor Projects Traffic Operatfons and Safety Non-Motorized Projects TIP Number # City-wide projects are not identified on this map. TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM MAP 44 8 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) City of Renton | 2019 - 2024 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TIP No. Project Title 1 Street Overlay 2 Arterial Rehabilitatfon Program 2.1 Renton Avenue S Resurfacing, S 130th St to Taylor Ave NW 2.2 SW 43rd St Resurfacing, SR 167 to west City Limits 3 Walkway Program 4 Roadway Safety and Guardrail Program 5 Intersectfon Safety & Mobility Program 6 Traffic Safety Program 7 Traffic Operatfon Devices Program 8 Intelligent Transportatfon Systems (ITS) Program 9 Sidewalk Rehabilitatfon and Replacement Program 10 Bridge Inspectfon & Repair Program 11 Barrier-Free Transitfon Plan Implementatfon 12 Project Development & Pre-Design Program 13 Arterial Circulatfon Program 14 1% for the Arts Program 15 Bronson Way N Bridge Repair, across Cedar River 16 Duvall Ave NE Roadway Improvements, NE 7th St to Sunset Blvd NE 17 Houser Way N Bridge Repair- Seismic Retrofit and Paintfng 18 Lake Washington Loop Trail, perimeter of the Renton Airport 19 NE Sunset Boulevard (SR 900) Corridor Improvements, I-405 to east City Limits 20 Park Ave North Extension, Logan Ave N to Southport 21 Rainier Ave S/N Corridor Improvements Phase 4, S 3rd St to NW 3rd Pl 22 Renton Connector, S 2nd St to S 5th St 23 116th Ave SE Improvements, Puget Drive SE to the south City Limits 24 South 2nd Street Conversion Project, Rainier Ave S to Main Ave S 25 Williams Ave N Bridge - Seismic Retrofit and Paintfng 26 Williams Ave S and Wells Ave S Conversion Project, S Grady Way to N 1st St 27 Carr Road improvements, Lind Ave SW to 116th Ave SE 28 Houser Way S/N Non-Motorized Improvements, Mill Ave S to Bronson Way S 29 Houser Way North Widening and Realignment, N 8th St to Lake Washington Blvd 30 Lake to Sound (L2S) Trail, East-West Trail connecting Lake Washington to Puget Sound 31 Lake Washington Blvd N/ Southport Access Improvements, Park Ave N to Gene Coulon Park 32 Lind Ave SW Roadway Widening, SW 16th St to SW 43rd St 33 Logan Ave North Improvements, S 2nd St to Park Ave N 34 Maple Valley Highway Barriers, vicinity of western edge of Riverview Park 35 Monster Road SW/68th Ave S Roadway Improvements, Monster Rd Bridge to City Limits 36 NE 3rd Street / NE 4th Street Corridor Improvements, Sunset Blvd N to the east City Limits 37 Nile Ave NE Bridge Repair, across May Creek 38 Rainier Ave N Corridor Improvements Phase 5, NW 3rd Pl to City Limits 39 Renton Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Improvements, S Renton Village Pl extension to S Grady Way 40 Transit Master Plan 41 South 3rd Street Conversion Project, Rainier Ave S to Main Ave S 42 South/Southwest 7th Street Corridor Improvements 43 South Grady Way Multf-Modal Improvements, Talbot Rd South to Rainier Ave South 44 South Lake Washington Transit Stop, vicinity of Southport Dr N and Garden Ave N 45 Sunset Area Green Connectfons, vicinity of Sunset Area Revitalization Area 46 SW 27th Street/Strander Boulevard Connectfon 47 Talbot Road S / S 177th St Signalizatfon and Roadway Improvements, adjacent to Valley Medical Center MAP INDEX 9 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) Section C Development and Prioritization 2019 – 2024 Transportation Improvement Program 10 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) City of Renton | 2019 - 2024 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TIP Development Activities TIP project and financial development actfvitfes are intricately intertwined and involve interactfons with many groups and agencies at the local, regional, state and federal levels. Within the Transportatfon Systems Division of the City of Renton, project development involves year-round coordinatfon between the Transportatfon Operatfons and Transportatfon Maintenance Sectfon, the Transportatfon Planning and Programming Sectfon and the Transportatfon Design Sectfon. The Transportatfon Operatfons and Maintenance Sectfon compiles accident and traffic count data, performs level-of-service calculatfons needed to identffy operatfonal/congestfon problems and tracks all transportatfon -related complaints, suggestfons and requests that come into the City. The Transportatfon Design Sectfon, through the TIP’s Overlay Program and Bridge Inspection and Repair Program, work closely with the Maintenance Services Division to establish structural ratfngs for the City’s roads and bridges. These and other data are being used by the Planning and Programming Sectfon to develop transportatfon improvement projects, prepare grant applicatfons, interface with ongoing state and federal transportatfon programs and develop a TIP that supports the goals of the City’s long-range Comprehensive Plan and current business plan. The Transportatfon Planning and Programming Sectfon works with Washington Department of Transporta- tfon, King County Metro Transit, Puget Sound Regional Council, Sound Transit and other groups and agencies to assure consistency between Renton’s transportatfon policies and programs and those of the region. Such consistency is required by the Growth Management Act and related legislatfon and by federal and state grant programs. With on-going changes to I-405 and SR 167 as well as the expansion of the Sound Transit network, especially the I-405 Bellevue to Renton Bus Rapid Transit, the City of Renton must look to creatfng and maintaining an infrastructure system to support these changes to the transportatfon system to promote economic vitality as well as providing a safe and healthy community. Ongoing transportatfon planning actfvitfes, such as updatfng the Transportatfon Element in the Comprehensive Plan and the development of sub-area plans, play an important part in identffying and prioritfzing transportatfon improvement projects. In recent years, long-range planning efforts have played a key role in the development of transportatfon projects for the City: Downtown Civic Core Vision & Action Plan, City Center Community Plan, Sunset Area Transformation Plan, and the Renton Trails and Bicycle Master Plan. All City of Renton departments and City Council are solicited each year to provide input, discuss and comment on the Six-Year TIP. Additfonal input is also gathered through interactfons with other public and private organizatfons and through public meetfngs held in the community concerning specific transportatfon projects and programs. 11 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) City of Renton | 2019 - 2024 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM At all levels of government - City, State and Federal - there are new laws and regulatfons that create the need for new or different kinds of transportatfon projects and programs that have tremendous impacts on the de- velopment and costs of transportatfon projects. Examples include the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century Act (MAP-21), the Growth Management Act, the Clean Air Act, the Commute Trip Reductfon law, the Endangered Species Act and the Surface Water Management Ordinance. Within the City of Renton, there are actfons and interactfons involving other departments and divisions, the private sector, the City Council and Administratfon, which strongly influence the directfon of the transportatfon program. For example, the transportatfon system is significantly impacted by land use decisions, private development proposals and by public water and sewer extensions which increase transportatfon demand by making possible higher density and/or intensity of land uses. Such proposals need to be monitored and analyzed in regard to how they individually and collectfvely create the need for transportatfon improvements. In summary, with its heavy dependence on many different and unpredictable sources of external funding and with the significant impacts created by ongoing local and regional land use decisions, transportatfon project development is a contfnuous actfvity comprised of a multftude of diverse elements. 12 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) City of Renton | 2019 - 2024 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM General Programming Criteria The yearly update of the Six-Year Transportatfon Improvement Program (TIP) is part of an ongoing process intrinsically linked with the development of the City’s Capital Improvement Program. The Six-Year TIP is also linked with various state and federal funding programs, regional/inter-jurisdictfonal planning and coordina- tfon processes and the City’s Growth Management Act Comprehensive Land Use Plan. Projects are developed and prioritfzed based on community needs, specific goals to be achieved and on gen- eral programming consideratfons. The general programming consideratfons include the following: PRIORITY – As shown on pages 15-17 the projects and programs are prioritfzed by type prepared by City staff with final approval by the City Council during the annual update of the TIP. The prioritfzatfon as- sists staff in assigning the limited resources to projects and programs and reducing resources during funding shortialls. In general, staff expends more resources on higher priority projects in the first three years of the TIP, and when applying for grants staff will consider these projects first unless oth- er lower priority projects better meet the partfcular criteria of a grant program. PLANNING – How, at a local and regional level, a project fits with or addresses identffied future trans- portatfon goals, demands and planning processes must be evaluated. This is strongly influenced by ongoing land use decisions and by regional highway and transit system plans. FINANCING – Many projects are dependent upon external grants, formatfon of LID’s or the receipt of im- pact fees. Prioritfzatfon has to take into account the peculiaritfes of each of the various fund sources and the probabilitfes of when and how much money will be available. SCHEDULING – If a project is interconnected with, or interdependent on, other projects taking place, this is reflected in their relatfve prioritfes. PAST COMMITMENT – The level of previous commitment made by the City in terms of resources, legis- latfve actfons or inter-local agreements must be taken into consideratfon in prioritfzing TIP projects. In additfon to the general consideratfons discussed above, there are five specific project categories through which the TIP is evaluated and analyzed. The categories include the following: Maintenance and Preservatfon of Existfng Infrastructure Corridor Projects Operatfons and Safety Non-Motorized Projects Other Programs These categories provide a useful analysis tool and represent goals developed through an evaluatfon of the City’s transportatfon program in response to input from citfzens and local officials and to state and federal legislatfon. 13 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) City of Renton | 2019 - 2024 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Taken as a whole, the five categories provide a framework for evaluatfng projects both individually and as part of a strategy that seeks to meet and balance the transportatfon needs of Renton during a tfme of in- creasing transportatfon demand, decreasing revenues, and growing environmental concerns. Although each project can be identffied with an important concern that allows it to be classified into one of the five categories, most projects are intended to address and are developed to be compatfble with multfple goals. Maintenance and Preservation of the Existing Infrastructure is a basic need that must be met by the program. The Mayor and City Council have emphasized the importance of sustaining strong programs in this project category and maintaining our current infrastructure. Therefore, more than half of the Transporta- tfon’s City Funds have historically been allocated under this category. The State Growth Management Act also requires jurisdictfons to assess and address the funding required to maintain their existfng transporta- tfon systems. The City of Renton owns and maintains 250 centerline miles of streets. Corridor Projects are oriented toward moving people through a balanced transportatfon system that in- volves multfple modes of transportatfon. Included are facilitfes that facilitate the movement of transit and carpools. The Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21), the State and Federal Clean Air legislatfon and the State Commute Trip Reductfon Act (CTR) have added momentum to regional efforts and placed requirements on local jurisdictfons such as Renton to promote these transportatfon elements. Operations and Safety projects and programs are developed through ongoing analyses of the transporta- tfon system and are directed mainly toward traffic engineering concerns such as safety and congestfon. Pro- jects are identffied not only by analysis of traffic counts, accident records and geometric data, but also through review and investfgatfon of citfzen complaints and requests. Non-Motorized Projects have been developed with major emphasis on addressing community quality of life issues by improving and/or protectfng residentfal livability while providing necessary transportatfon sys- tem improvements. Bicycle and pedestrian projects are included in this category. Other Programs involve planning of transportatfon improvements necessitated by new development and new transportatfon capital improvements. 14 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) City of Renton | 2019 - 2024 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Summary of Projects and Prioritization The prioritfzatfon of the TIP is influenced by the interconnectfon and/or interdependence among TIP projects and with projects by other City departments and by other jurisdictfons as well as the tfming of those transportatfon projects. Equally important to the prioritfzatfon below is the likelihood, the tfme frame, and the amount of outside funding that will be obtainable to finance transportatfon projects. The prioritfzatfon lists below are sorted by the category type of the projects. Priority TIP No. Project Title Community Planning Area Maintenance and Preservation of the Existing Infrastructure 1 1 Street Overlay Citywide 2 2 Arterial Rehabilitation Program Citywide 3 2.1 Renton Avenue S Resurfacing, S 130th St to Taylor Ave NW City Center 4 2.2 SW 43rd St Resurfacing, SR 167 to west City Limits Valley 5 15 Bronson Way N Bridge Repair, across Cedar River City Center 6 17 Houser Way N Bridge Repair, across Cedar River City Center 7 25 Williams Ave N Bridge Repair, across Cedar River City Center 8 9 Sidewalk Rehabilitation and Replacement Program Citywide 9 37 Nile Ave NE Bridge Repair, across May Creek East Plateau 10 10 Bridge Inspection & Repair Program Citywide 11 4 Roadway Safety and Guardrail Program Citywide 15 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) City of Renton | 2019 - 2024 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Priority TIP No. Project Title Community Planning Area Corridor Projects 1 26 Williams Ave S and Wells Ave S Conversion Project, S Grady Way to N 1st St City Center 2 20 Park Ave North Extension, Logan Ave N to Southport City Center 3 21 Rainier Ave S/N Corridor Improvements Phase 4, S 3rd St to NW 3rd Pl City Center 4 16 Duvall Ave NE Roadway Improvements, NE 7th St to Sunset Blvd NE Highlands & E. Plateau 5 24 South 2nd Street Conversion Project, Rainier Ave S to Main St City Center 6 19 NE Sunset Boulevard (SR 900) Corridor Improvements I-405 to east City Limits Highlands 7 23 116th Ave SE Improvements, Puget Drive SE to the south City Limits Benson 8 41 South 3rd Street Conversion Project, Rainier Ave S to Main St City Center 9 22 Renton Connector, S 2nd St to S 5th St City Center 10 44 South Lake Washington Transit Stop, vicinity of Southport Dr N and Garden Ave N City Center 11 27 Carr Road improvements, Lind Ave SW to 116th Ave SE Talbot & Benson 12 39 Renton Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Improvements, S Renton Village Pl extension to S Grady Way City Center 13 42 South 7th Street Corridor Improvements, Rainier Ave South to Talbot Road South City Center 14 31 Lake Washington Blvd N/ Southport Access Improvements, Park Ave N to Gene Coulon Park City Center 15 43 South Grady Way Multi-Modal Improvements, Talbot Rd South to Rainier Ave South City Center 16 38 Rainier Ave N Corridor Improvements Phase 5, NW 3rd Pl to City Limits City Center 17 29 Houser Way North Widening and Realignment, N 8th St to Lake Washington Blvd City Center 18 33 Logan Ave North Improvements, S 2nd St to Park Ave N City Center 19 36 NE 3rd Street / NE 4th Street Corridor Improvements, Sunset Blvd N to the east City Limits Highlands & E. Plateau 20 32 Lind Ave SW Roadway Widening, SW 16th St to SW 43rd St Valley 21 35 Monster Road SW/68th Ave S Roadway Improvements, Monster Rd Bridge and City Limits Valley 22 46 SW 27th Street/Strander Boulevard Connection Valley 16 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) City of Renton | 2019 - 2024 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Priority TIP No. Project Title Community Planning Area Operations and Safety 1 5 Intersection Safety & Mobility Program Citywide 2 6 Traffic Safety Program Citywide 3 8 Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Program Citywide 4 7 Traffic Operation Devices Program Citywide 5 34 Maple Valley Highway Barriers, west edge of Riverview Park Cedar River 6 47 Talbot Road S / S 177th St Signalization and Roadway Improvements, adjacent to Valley Medical Center Talbot Non-Motorized Projects 1 18 Lake Washington Loop Trail, south perimeter of the Renton Airport City Center 2 30 Lake to Sound (L2S) Trail, East-West Trail connecting Lake Washington to Puget Sound Valley & City Center 3 28 Houser Way S/N Non-Motorized Improvements, Mill Ave S to Bronson Way S City Center 4 11 Barrier-Free Transition Plan Implementation Citywide 5 3 Walkway Program Citywide 6 45 Sunset Area Green Connections, vicnity of Sunset Area Revitilzation Area Highlands Other Programs 1 13 Arterial Circulation Program Citywide 2 12 Project Development & Pre-Design Program Citywide 3 40 Transit Master Plan Citywide 4 14 1% for the Arts Program N/A 17 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) Section D Expenditures and Revenues 2019 – 2024 Transportation Improvement Program 18 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) City of Renton | 2019‐2024 Transportation Improvement Program TIP No. Project Title 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Six‐Year Period  Total 1 Street Overlay $1,090,000 $1,170,000 $2,070,000 $2,170,000 $2,260,000 $2,360,000 $11,120,000 2 Arterial Rehabilitation Program $1,540,000 $1,610,000 $1,680,000 $4,830,000 2.1 Renton Avenue S Resurfacing $550,000 $550,000 2.2 SW 43rd St Resurfacing $220,000 $1,820,000 $2,040,000 3 Walkway Program $200,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $1,450,000 4 Roadway Safety and Guardrail Program $25,000 $25,000 $30,000 $30,000 $35,000 $35,000 $180,000 5 Intersection Safety & Mobility Program $250,000 $200,000 $350,000 $350,000 $350,000 $350,000 $1,850,000 6 Traffic Safety Program $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $900,000 7 Traffic Operation Devices Program $120,000 $120,000 $120,000 $120,000 $120,000 $120,000 $720,000 8 Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Program $60,000 $60,000 $60,000 $60,000 $60,000 $60,000 $360,000 9 Sidewalk Rehabilitation and Replacement Program $100,000 $110,000 $110,000 $110,000 $110,000 $110,000 $650,000 10 Bridge Inspection & Repair Program $90,000 $50,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $540,000 11 Barrier‐Free Transition Plan Implementation $60,000 $80,000 $80,000 $80,000 $80,000 $80,000 $460,000 12 Project Development & Pre‐Design Program $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $900,000 13 Arterial Circulation Program $145,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $895,000 14 1% for the Arts Program $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $90,000 15 Bronson Way N Bridge Repair $420,000 $2,510,000 $2,930,000 16 Duvall Ave NE Roadway Improvements $1,512,139 $1,512,139 17 Houser Way N Bridge Repair $470,000 $2,531,900 $222,550 $3,224,450 18 Lake Washington Loop Trail $340,000 $1,425,000 $1,200,000 $950,000 $3,250,000 $7,165,000 19 NE Sunset Blvd (SR 900) Corridor Improvements $459,000 $2,750,000 $7,550,000 $6,850,000 $6,450,000 $6,250,000 $30,309,000 20 Park Ave North Extension $5,825,000 $625,000 $6,450,000 21 Rainier Ave S/N Corridor Improvements Phase 4 $1,500,000 $1,951,323 $8,800,000 $5,850,000 $150,000 $18,251,323 22 Renton Connector $278,700 $621,300 $3,963,000 $8,850,000 $13,713,000 23 116th Ave SE Improvements $1,600,000 $3,700,000 $2,600,000 $2,200,000 $10,100,000 24 South 2nd Street Conversion Project $100,000 $1,350,000 $7,800,000 $7,800,000 $17,050,000 25 Williams Ave N Bridge Repair $470,000 $2,740,450 $3,210,450 26 Williams Ave S and Wells Ave S Conversion Project $1,933,800 $6,348,269 $8,282,069 27 Carr Road improvements $50,000 $50,000 28 Houser Way Non‐Motorized Improvements $385,000 $836,000 $966,000 $2,187,000 29 Houser Way North Widening and Realignment $1,065,000 $1,560,000 $2,340,000 $4,965,000 30 Lake to Sound (L2S) Trail $2,800,000 $2,800,000 31 Lake Wash. Blvd N/Southport Access Improvements $2,000,000 $2,000,000 32 Lind Ave SW Roadway Widening $400,000 $1,650,000 $2,350,000 $4,400,000 33 Logan Ave North Improvements $1,240,000 $10,000,000 $11,240,000 34 Maple Valley Highway Barriers $299,035 $2,838,865 $3,137,900 35 Monster Road SW/68th Ave S  Improvements $50,000 $8,000,000 $8,050,000 36 NE 3rd Street / NE 4th Street Corridor Improvements $20,000 $20,000 $750,000 $4,190,000 $5,180,000 $3,200,000 $13,360,000 37 Nile Ave NE Bridge Repair $50,000 $200,000 $250,000 38 Rainier Ave N Corridor Improvements Phase 5 $100,000 $2,000,000 $2,100,000 39 Renton Bus  Rapid Transit (BRT) Improvements $3,195,000 $9,052,500 $9,052,500 $21,300,000 40 Renton Master Transit Plan $300,000 $200,000 $500,000 41 South 3rd Street Conversion Project $4,000,000 $6,500,000 $10,700,000 $21,200,000 42 S/SW 7th Street Corridor Improvements $200,000 $1,600,000 $10,364,000 $3,608,928 $15,772,928 43 South Grady Way Multi‐Modal Improvements $550,000 $1,760,000 $1,690,000 $4,000,000 44 South Lake Washington Transit Stop $4,350,000 $4,350,000 45 Sunset Area Green Connections $3,600,000 $10,700,000 $7,900,000 $22,200,000 46 SW 27th Street/Strander Boulevard Connection 47 Talbot Road S / S 177th St Improvements TOTAL EXPENDITURES $20,804,939 $23,801,942 $35,905,285 $57,030,165 $80,475,500 $75,577,428 $293,595,259 SUMMARY OF PROJECT EXPENDITURES 19 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) City of Renton | 2019‐2024 Transportation Improvement Program TIP No. Project Title 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Six‐Year Period  Total 1 Street Overlay $700,000 $710,000 $720,000 $730,000 $740,000 $750,000 $4,350,000 2 Arterial Rehabilitation Program 2.1 Renton Avenue S Resurfacing 2.2 SW 43rd St Resurfacing 3 Walkway Program 4 Roadway Safety and Guardrail Program 5 Intersection Safety & Mobility Program 6 Traffic Safety Program 7 Traffic Operation Devices Program 8 Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Program 9 Sidewalk Rehabilitation and Replacement Program 10 Bridge Inspection & Repair Program 11 Barrier‐Free Transition Plan Implementation 12 Project Development & Pre‐Design Program 13 Arterial Circulation Program 14 1% for the Arts Program 15 Bronson Way N Bridge Repair 16 Duvall Ave NE Roadway Improvements 17 Houser Way N Bridge Repair 18 Lake Washington Loop Trail 19 NE Sunset Boulevard (SR 900) Corridor Improvements 20 Park Ave North Extension 21 Rainier Ave S/N Corridor Improvements Phase 4 22 Renton Connector 23 116th Ave SE Improvements 24 South 2nd Street Conversion Project 25 Williams Ave N Bridge Repair 26 Williams Ave S and Wells Ave S Conversion Project 27 Carr Road improvements 28 Houser Way Non‐Motorized Improvements 29 Houser Way North Widening and Realignment 30 Lake to Sound (L2S) Trail 31 Lake Washington Blvd N/ Southport Access Improvements 32 Lind Ave SW Roadway Widening 33 Logan Ave North Improvements 34 Maple Valley Highway Attenuator 35 Monster Road SW/68th Ave S Roadway Improvements 36 NE 3rd Street / NE 4th Street Corridor Improvements 37 Nile Ave NE Bridge Repair 38 Rainier Ave N Corridor Improvements Phase 5 39 Renton Bus  Rapid Transit (BRT) Improvements 40 Renton Master Transit Plan 41 South 3rd Street Conversion Project 42 S/SW 7th Street Corridor Improvements 43 South Grady Way Multi‐Modal Improvements 44 South Lake Washington Transit Stop 45 Sunset Area Green Connections 46 SW 27th Street/Strander Boulevard Connection 47 Talbot Road S / S 177th St Improvements TOTAL VEHICLE FUEL TAX $700,000 $710,000 $720,000 $730,000 $740,000 $750,000 $4,350,000 RESOURCE: VEHICLE FUEL TAX 20 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) City of Renton | 2019‐2024 Transportation Improvement Program TIP No. Project Title 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Six‐Year Period  Total 1 Street Overlay $390,000 $460,000 $490,000 $530,000 $560,000 $600,000 $3,030,000 2 Arterial Rehabilitation Program $510,000 $530,000 $550,000 $1,590,000 2.1 Renton Avenue S Resurfacing $275,000 $275,000 2.2 SW 43rd St Resurfacing $220,000 $820,000 $1,040,000 3 Walkway Program $200,000 $250,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $850,000 4 Roadway Safety and Guardrail Program $25,000 $25,000 $30,000 $30,000 $35,000 $35,000 $180,000 5 Intersection Safety & Mobility Program 6 Traffic Safety Program $130,000 $70,000 $200,000 7 Traffic Operation Devices Program $120,000 $120,000 $120,000 $120,000 $120,000 $120,000 $720,000 8 Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Program 9 Sidewalk Rehabilitation and Replacement Program $100,000 $110,000 $110,000 $110,000 $110,000 $110,000 $650,000 10 Bridge Inspection & Repair Program $90,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $340,000 11 Barrier‐Free Transition Plan Implementation $60,000 $80,000 $140,000 12 Project Development & Pre‐Design Program $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $900,000 13 Arterial Circulation Program $145,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $895,000 14 1% for the Arts Program $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $90,000 15 Bronson Way N Bridge Repair 16 Duvall Ave NE Roadway Improvements $30,000 $30,000 17 Houser Way N Bridge Repair, 18 Lake Washington Loop Trail $75,000 $75,000 19 NE Sunset Boulevard (SR 900) Corridor Improvements $32,975 $32,975 20 Park Ave North Extension 21 Rainier Ave S/N Corridor Improvements Phase 4 $100,000 $450,000 $550,000 22 Renton Connector 23 116th Ave SE Improvements 24 South 2nd Street Conversion Project $100,000 $100,000 25 Williams Ave N Bridge Repair $122,550 $122,550 26 Williams Ave S and Wells Ave S Conversion Project 27 Carr Road improvements 28 Houser Way Non‐Motorized Improvements 29 Houser Way North Widening and Realignment 30 Lake to Sound (L2S) Trail 31 Lake Washington Blvd N/ Southport Access Improvements 32 Lind Ave SW Roadway Widening 33 Logan Ave North Improvements 34 Maple Valley Highway Barriers 35 Monster Road SW/68th Ave S Roadway Improvements 36 NE 3rd Street / NE 4th Street Corridor Improvements $20,000 $20,000 $40,000 37 Nile Ave NE Bridge Repair 38 Rainier Ave N Corridor Improvements Phase 5 39 Renton Bus  Rapid Transit (BRT) Improvements 40 Renton Master Transit Plan 41 South 3rd Street Conversion Project 42 S/SW 7th Street Corridor Improvements 43 South Grady Way Multi‐Modal Improvements 44 South Lake Washington Transit Stop 45 Sunset Area Green Connections 46 SW 27th Street/Strander Boulevard Connection 47 Talbot Road S / S 177th St Improvements TOTAL B & O Share $1,782,975 $2,017,550 $2,135,000 $2,215,000 $1,820,000 $1,880,000 $11,850,525 RESOURCE: BUSINESS LICENSE AND BUSINESS & OCCUPATION 21 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) City of Renton | 2019‐2024 Transportation Improvement Program TIP No. Project Title 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Six‐Year    Period Total 1 Street Overlay 2 Arterial Rehabilitation Program 2.1 Renton Avenue S Resurfacing 2.2 SW 43rd St Resurfacing $1,000,000 $1,000,000 3 Walkway Program 4 Roadway Safety and Guardrail Program 5 Intersection Safety & Mobility Program 6 Traffic Safety Program 7 Traffic Operation Devices Program 8 Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Program 9 Sidewalk Rehabilitation and Replacement Program 10 Bridge Inspection & Repair Program 11 Barrier‐Free Transition Plan Implementation 12 Project Development & Pre‐Design Program 13 Arterial Circulation Program 14 1% for the Arts Program 15 Bronson Way N Bridge Repair $420,000 $2,510,000 $2,930,000 16 Duvall Ave NE Roadway Improvements $1,049,039 $1,049,039 17 Houser Way N Bridge Repair $406,550 $2,531,900 $2,938,450 18 Lake Washington Loop Trail $340,000 $1,042,961 $1,382,961 19 NE Sunset Boulevard (SR 900) Corridor Improvements $426,025 $426,025 20 Park Ave North Extension 21 Rainier Ave S/N Corridor Improvements Phase 4 $1,192,475 $1,358,000 $5,800,000 $8,350,475 22 Renton Connector 23 116th Ave SE Improvements 24 South 2nd Street Conversion Project $1,200,000 $1,200,000 25 Williams Ave N Bridge Repair $406,550 $2,517,900 $2,924,450 26 Williams Ave S and Wells Ave S Conversion Project $1,453,800 $2,396,200 $3,850,000 27 Carr Road improvements 28 Houser Way Non‐Motorized Improvements 29 Houser Way North Widening and Realignment 30 Lake to Sound (L2S) Trail 31 Lake Washington Blvd N/ Southport Access Improvements 32 Lind Ave SW Roadway Widening 33 Logan Ave North Improvements 34 Maple Valley Highway Barriers 35 Monster Road SW/68th Ave S Roadway Improvements 36 NE 3rd Street / NE 4th Street Corridor Improvements 37 Nile Ave NE Bridge Repair 38 Rainier Ave N Corridor Improvements Phase 5 39 Renton Bus  Rapid Transit (BRT) Improvements 40 Renton Master Transit Plan 41 South 3rd Street Conversion Project 42 S/SW 7th Street Corridor Improvements 43 South Grady Way Multi‐Modal Improvements 44 South Lake Washington Transit Stop 45 Sunset Area Green Connections 46 SW 27th Street/Strander Boulevard Connection 47 Talbot Road S / S 177th St Improvements TOTAL GRANTS AWARDED $5,694,439 $12,356,961 $8,000,000 $26,051,400 RESOURCE: GRANTS AWARDED 22 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) City of Renton | 2019‐2024 Transportation Improvement Program TIP No. Project Title 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Six‐Year    Period Total 1 Street Overlay 2 Arterial Rehabilitation Program 2.1 Renton Avenue S Resurfacing 2.2 SW 43rd St Resurfacing 3 Walkway Program 4 Roadway Safety and Guardrail Program 5 Intersection Safety & Mobility Program $250,000 $200,000 $450,000 6 Traffic Safety Program $10,000 $80,000 $90,000 7 Traffic Operation Devices Program 8 Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Program $60,000 $60,000 $120,000 9 Sidewalk Rehabilitation and Replacement Program 10 Bridge Inspection & Repair Program 11 Barrier‐Free Transition Plan Implementation 12 Project Development & Pre‐Design Program 13 Arterial Circulation Program 14 1% for the Arts Program 15 Bronson Way N Bridge Repair 16 Duvall Ave NE Roadway Improvements $322,475 $322,475 17 Houser Way N Bridge Repair 18 Lake Washington Loop Trail $307,039 $307,039 19 NE Sunset Boulevard (SR 900) Corridor Improvements 20 Park Ave North Extension 21 Rainier Ave S/N Corridor Improvements Phase 4 $307,525 $593,323 $700,000 $945,000 $150,000 $2,695,848 22 Renton Connector 23 116th Ave SE Improvements 24 South 2nd Street Conversion Project 25 Williams Ave N Bridge Repair 26 Williams Ave S and Wells Ave S Conversion Project 27 Carr Road improvements $50,000 $50,000 28 Houser Way Non‐Motorized Improvements 29 Houser Way North Widening and Realignment 30 Lake to Sound (L2S) Trail 31 Lake Washington Blvd N/ Southport Access Improvements 32 Lind Ave SW Roadway Widening 33 Logan Ave North Improvements 34 Maple Valley Highway Barriers 35 Monster Road SW/68th Ave S Roadway Improvements 36 NE 3rd Street / NE 4th Street Corridor Improvements 37 Nile Ave NE Bridge Repair 38 Rainier Ave N Corridor Improvements Phase 5 39 Renton Bus  Rapid Transit (BRT) Improvements 40 Renton Master Transit Plan 41 South 3rd Street Conversion Project 42 S/SW 7th Street Corridor Improvements 43 South Grady Way Multi‐Modal Improvements 44 South Lake Washington Transit Stop 45 Sunset Area Green Connections 46 SW 27th Street/Strander Boulevard Connection 47 Talbot Road S / S 177th St Improvements TOTAL MITIGATION $1,000,000 $1,240,362 $700,000 $945,000 $150,000 $4,035,362 RESOURCE: MITIGATION (IMPACT FEES) 23 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) City of Renton | 2019‐2024 Transportation Improvement Program TIP No. Project Title 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Six‐Year    Period Total 1 Street Overlay 2 Arterial Rehabilitation Program 2.1 Renton Avenue S Resurfacing 2.2 SW 43rd St Resurfacing 3 Walkway Program 4 Roadway Safety and Guardrail Program 5 Intersection Safety & Mobility Program 6 Traffic Safety Program 7 Traffic Operation Devices Program 8 Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Program 9 Sidewalk Rehabilitation and Replacement Program 10 Bridge Inspection & Repair Program 11 Barrier‐Free Transition Plan Implementation 12 Project Development & Pre‐Design Program 13 Arterial Circulation Program 14 1% for the Arts Program 15 Bronson Way N Bridge Repair 16 Duvall Ave NE Roadway Improvements 17 Houser Way N Bridge Repair 18 Lake Washington Loop Trail 19 NE Sunset Boulevard (SR 900) Corridor Improvements 20 Park Ave North Extension $5,825,000 $625,000 $6,450,000 21 Rainier Ave S/N Corridor Improvements Phase 4 $2,100,000 $4,455,000 $6,555,000 22 Renton Connector 23 116th Ave SE Improvements 24 South 2nd Street Conversion Project 25 Williams Ave N Bridge Repair 26 Williams Ave S and Wells Ave S Conversion Project 27 Carr Road improvements 28 Houser Way Non‐Motorized Improvements 29 Houser Way North Widening and Realignment 30 Lake to Sound (L2S) Trail $2,800,000 $2,800,000 31 Lake Washington Blvd N/ Southport Access Improvements $2,000,000 $2,000,000 32 Lind Ave SW Roadway Widening 33 Logan Ave North Improvements 34 Maple Valley Highway Barriers 35 Monster Road SW/68th Ave S Roadway Improvements 36 NE 3rd Street / NE 4th Street Corridor Improvements 37 Nile Ave NE Bridge Repair 38 Rainier Ave N Corridor Improvements Phase 5 39 Renton Bus  Rapid Transit (BRT) Improvements 40 Renton Master Transit Plan 41 South 3rd Street Conversion Project 42 S/SW 7th Street Corridor Improvements 43 South Grady Way Multi‐Modal Improvements 44 South Lake Washington Transit Stop 45 Sunset Area Green Connections 46 SW 27th Street/Strander Boulevard Connection 47 Talbot Road S / S 177th St Improvements TOTAL OTHER SOURCES $10,625,000 $625,000 $2,100,000 $4,455,000 $17,805,000 RESOURCE: OTHER (Developer Contributions, Other Agencies, etc) 24 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) Section E Project Descriptions 2019 – 2024 Transportation Improvement Program 25 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019 - 2024 TIP No. 1 Project Title:Street Overlay Community Planning Area:Citywide Fund: Functional Classification:Local and Collector Project: Project Length:various Contact: Project Description: Justification: Status: Changes: Funded:Unfunded: Spent 2017 2018 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Expenditures: Planning - - - - - - - - - - Preliminary Engineering 28,000 - 4,000 24,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 R-O-W (includes Admin)- - - - - - - - - - Construction 14,161,226 1,671,226 1,730,000 10,760,000 1,030,000 1,110,000 2,010,000 2,110,000 2,200,000 2,300,000 Construction Services 455,947 63,947 56,000 336,000 56,000 56,000 56,000 56,000 56,000 56,000 Post Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenses 14,645,173 1,735,173 1,790,000 11,120,000 1,090,000 1,170,000 2,070,000 2,170,000 2,260,000 2,360,000 Source of Fund: Vehicle Fuel Tax 5,680,000 660,000 670,000 4,350,000 700,000 710,000 720,000 730,000 740,000 750,000 Business & Occupation Share 3,395,173 75,173 290,000 3,030,000 390,000 460,000 490,000 530,000 560,000 600,000 Fund Balance 30,000 - 30,000 - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (1)- - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (2)- - - - - - - - - - Mitigation 800,000 - 800,000 - - - - - - - Bonds / LID's Formed - - - - - - - - - - Other (Gen Fund Transfer)1,000,000 1,000,000 - - - - - - - - Other (2)- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Undetermined 3,740,000 - - 3,740,000 - - 860,000 910,000 960,000 1,010,000 Total Sources 14,645,173 1,735,173 1,790,000 11,120,000 1,090,000 1,170,000 2,070,000 2,170,000 2,260,000 2,360,000 122108 317 Street Overlay Project Expenditures & Resources Programmed Michelle Faltaous 425-430-7301 Annual program for repairing and resurfacing existing roadways. Installation of ADA compliant curb ramps has been incorporated into the Street Overlay Program in accordance with federal requirements. This program funds overlays on neighborhood streets and collector streets while the Arterial Rehabilitation Program (TIP No. 2) funds principal and minor arterials. This program allocates $100K/yr for the overlay of alleyways. Asphalt concrete pavement (ACP) overlay and slurry seal of streets provide for improved driving surface and are highly cost-effective ways of avoiding expensive repairs and reconstruction. The Pavement Management System and biennial survey of roadway conditions greatly improve the efficiency of the Overlay Program. The 2016 "Pavement Management Program State of the Streets Report" rated the average Pavement Condition Index (PCI) as 68. According to the report, $78M will need to be invested in pavement rehabilitation in the next 10 years to bring the PCI to 70 and maintain it at that level. The City will be conducting an updated street survey through the summer of 2018. Due to increasing ADA regulations starting in 2019, the annual design and contract award will be prepared by a Consultant. The ADA required curb ramps may be split out into its own contract. 10,905,173 3,740,000 Programmed Pre-2019 Six-Year Program 26 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019 - 2024 TIP No. 2 Project Title:Arterial Rehabilitation Program Community Planning Area:Citywide Fund: Functional Classification:Principal and Minor Arterial Project: Project Length:various Contact: Project Description: Justification: Status: Changes: Funded:Unfunded: Spent 2017 2018 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Expenditures: Planning - - - - - - - - - - Preliminary Engineering - - - - - - - - - - R-O-W (includes Admin)- - - - - - - - - - Construction 3,240,000 - - 3,240,000 - - - 1,030,000 1,080,000 1,130,000 Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Post Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Other (City Match)1,590,000 - - 1,590,000 - - - 510,000 530,000 550,000 Total Expenses 4,830,000 - - 4,830,000 - - - 1,540,000 1,610,000 1,680,000 Resources: Vehicle Fuel Tax - - - - - - - - - - Business & Occupation Share 1,590,000 - - 1,590,000 - - - 510,000 530,000 550,000 Fund Balance - - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (1)- - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (2)- - - - - - - - - - Mitigation - - - - - - - - - - Bonds / LID's Formed - - - - - - - - - - Other (1)- - - - - - - - - - Other (2)- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Undetermined 3,240,000 - - 3,240,000 - - - 1,030,000 1,080,000 1,130,000 Total Sources 4,830,000 - - 4,830,000 - - - 1,540,000 1,610,000 1,680,000 Arterial Rehabilitation Program 1,590,000 3,240,000 Project Expenditures & Resources Programmed Programmed Pre-2019 Six-Year Program The 2016 "Pavement Management Program State of the Streets Report" rated the average Pavement Condition Index (PCI) as 68. According to the report, $78M will need to ne invested in pavement rehabilitation in the next 10 years to bring the PCI to 70 and maintain it at that level. The City was awarded a $1,020,700 STP grant for the Renton Ave Extension and $1,000,000 was awarded to SW 43rd St. Expenditures and Funds for years 2019, 2020, & 2021 are reflected in individual TIP project sheets for Renton Ave Resurfacing (TIP #2.1) and SW 43rd Preservation (TIP #2.2). 317 Michelle Faltaous 425-430-7301 This program provides for the rehabilitation of principal and minor arterial streets. Installation of ADA-compliant curb ramps has been incorporated into the annual Arterial Rehabilitation and Overlay programs according to new federal requirements. This program will provide funding for the City match for larger federally funded projects. The Overlay Program (TIP #1) concentrates to a great degree on maintaining residential streets, where relatively small traffic volumes and less truck and bus traffic make standard asphalt overlays a long term means of maintenance. Arterial streets can often deteriorate rather quickly and often require more costly rehabilitation measures and/or costly temporary repairs to avoid more extensive deterioration. 122186 27 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019 - 2024 TIP No. 2.1 Project Title:Arterial Rehabilitation - Renton Ave S Resurfacing Community Planning Area:West Hill Fund: Functional Classification:Minor Arterial Project: Project Length:0.60 mi Contact: Project Description: Justification: Status: Changes: Funded:Unfunded: Pre-2018 2018 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Expenditures: Planning - - - - - - - - - - Preliminary Engineering 78,310 78,310 - - - - - - - - R-O-W (includes Admin)- - - - - - - - - - Construction 1,875,390 - 1,325,390 550,000 550,000 - - - - - Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Post Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenses 1,953,700 78,310 1,325,390 550,000 550,000 - - - - - Resources: Vehicle Fuel Tax - - - - - - - - - - Business & Occupation Share 505,655 78,310 152,345 275,000 275,000 - - - - - Fund Balance 427,345 - 152,345 275,000 275,000 - - - - - Grants Awarded (STP)1,020,700 - 1,020,700 - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (2)- - - - - - - - - - Mitigation - - - - - - - - - - Bonds / LID's Formed - - - - - - - - - - Other (1)- - - - - - - - - - Other (2)- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Undetermined - - - - - - - - - - Total Sources 1,953,700 78,310 1,325,390 550,000 550,000 - - - - - Arterial Rehabilitation - Renton Ave S Resurfacing 1,953,700 - Project Expenditures & Resources Programmed Programmed Pre-2019 Six-Year Program The construction of this project is being coordinated with development construction along Renton Ave S to minimize construction impacts and cost. 317 Hebe Bernardo 425-430-7232 This project will resurface 0.60 miles of Renton Ave S from S 130th St (west City Limits) to Hardie Ave SW and upgrade ADA ramps to current standards. The roadway is classified as a T-2 truck route carrying 5.8 million tones of freight annually. The overall condition of the pavement will be improved and the project will extend the pavement life (12-15 years). Renton Ave S is also an alternate route to SR-900, connecting Renton to the Skyway area and South Seattle. The City was awarded a $1,020,700 STP grant for Pavement Preservation in 2016. Design is underway and will be completed in the Fall of 2018. Construction to be completed in 2019. 122185 28 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019 - 2024 TIP No. 2.2 Project Title:Arterial Rehabilitation - SW 43rd St Pavement Preservation Community Planning Area:Valley Fund: Functional Classification:Principal Arterial Project: Project Length:1.17 mi Contact: Project Description: Justification: Status: Changes: Funded:Unfunded: Pre-2018 2018 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Expenditures: Planning - - - - - - - - - - Preliminary Engineering 220,000 - - 220,000 - 220,000 - - - - R-O-W (includes Admin)- - - - - - - - - - Construction 1,820,000 - - 1,820,000 - - 1,820,000 - - - Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Post Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenses 2,040,000 - - 2,040,000 - 220,000 1,820,000 - - - Resources: Vehicle Fuel Tax - - - - - - - - - - Business & Occupation Share 1,040,000 - - 1,040,000 - 220,000 820,000 - - - Fund Balance - - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (STP Preservation)1,000,000 - - 1,000,000 - - 1,000,000 - - - Grants Awarded (2)- - - - - - - - - - Mitigation - - - - - - - - - - Bonds / LID's Formed - - - - - - - - - - Other (1)- - - - - - - - - - Other (2)- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Undetermined - - - - - - - - Total Sources 2,040,000 - - 2,040,000 - 220,000 1,820,000 - - - 2,040,000 - Project Expenditures & Resources Programmed Programmed Pre-2019 Six-Year Program Arterial Rehabilitation - SW 43rd St Pavement Preservation 317 NEW Michelle Faltaous 425-430-7301 This project will resurface the roadway from the western city limits to the SR 167 Ramps, except where there are existing concrete panels. This project will also upgrade all intersection ramps to current ADA standards as well as install and replace all delineation to City of Renton standards. Also included in this project are the adjustment or evaluation for replacement of existing features affected by resurfacing such as monuments, catch basins, or drainage grates. This principal arterial and T-1 truck route is a major east-west corridor that serves and directly connects to the Sounder Station. SW 43rd St connects directly to SR 167 and is used as a main access to Valley Medical Center, IKEA, and other major employment centers. Resurfacing this roadway will improve the overall condition of the pavement and the project will extend the pavement life (12-15 years) of this key east-west South County corridor. New project. The City was awarded a $1,000,000 STP grant for Pavement Preservation in 2018. 29 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019 - 2024 TIP No. 3 Project Title:Walkway Program Community Planning Area:Citywide Fund: Functional Classification:various Project: Project Length:various Contact: Project Description: Justification: Status: Changes: Funded:Unfunded: Spent 2017 2018 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Expenditures: Planning 32,000 - 2,000 30,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 Preliminary Engineering 150,000 - - 150,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 R-O-W (includes Admin)- - - - - - - - - - Construction 1,231,088 73,088 8,000 1,150,000 150,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 Construction Services 120,000 - - 120,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 Post Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenses 1,533,088 73,088 10,000 1,450,000 200,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 Resources: Vehicle Fuel Tax - - - - - - - - - - Business & Occupation Share 933,088 73,088 10,000 850,000 200,000 250,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 Fund Balance - - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (1)- - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (2)- - - - - - - - - - Mitigation - - - - - - - - - - Bonds / LID's Formed - - - - - - - - - - Other (1)- - - - - - - - - - Other (2)- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Undetermined 600,000 - - 600,000 - - 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 Total Sources 1,533,088 73,088 10,000 1,450,000 200,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 933,088 600,000 Project Expenditures & Resources Programmed Programmed Pre-2019 Six-Year Program Walkway Program With the cost of design and construction of sidewalk projects exceeding the annual funding for this program, this program was used as match funding for grant applications in 2018. 317 120009 Hebe Bernardo 425-430-7232 This program provides for the design and construction of non-motorized transportation facilities for pedestrians as well as provide City match funding for larger federal and state funded projects. Projects are identified and prioritized using criteria from the Comprehensive Citywide Walkway Study, Council direction, and through coordination with the City's Neighborhood Program. Providing safe and convenient non-motorized facilities is an integral part of a complete transportation network. Specific improvements will respond to the needs of school children, the aged and persons with disabilities, and support increased use of transit. The Comprehensive Citywide Walkway Study was completed in 2009 and is being used to select projects that move into the design and construction phases. 30 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019 - 2024 TIP No. 4 Project Title:Roadway Safety and Guardrail Program Community Planning Area:Citywide Fund: Functional Classification:various Project: Project Length:various Contact: Project Description: Justification: Status: Changes: Funded:Unfunded: Spent 2017 2018 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Expenditures: Planning - - - - - - - - - - Preliminary Engineering 21,000 - 3,000 18,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 R-O-W (includes Admin)- - - - - - - - - - Construction 175,000 714 24,286 150,000 20,000 20,000 25,000 25,000 30,000 30,000 Construction Services 14,000 - 2,000 12,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 Post Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenses 210,000 714 29,286 180,000 25,000 25,000 30,000 30,000 35,000 35,000 Resources: Vehicle Fuel Tax - - - - - - - - - - Business & Occupation Share 210,000 714 29,286 180,000 25,000 25,000 30,000 30,000 35,000 35,000 Fund Balance - - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (1)- - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (2)- - - - - - - - - - Mitigation - - - - - - - - - - Bonds / LID's Formed - - - - - - - - - - Other (1)- - - - - - - - - - Other (2)- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Undetermined - - - - - - - - - - Total Sources 210,000 714 29,286 180,000 25,000 25,000 30,000 30,000 35,000 35,000 210,000 - Project Expenditures & Resources Programmed Programmed Pre-2019 Six-Year Program Roadway Safety and Guardrail Program 317 120110 Chris Barnes 425-430-7220 This program will provide guardrail improvements each year and improve the safety of the roadside environment. This program will implement roadside safety improvements including barrier systems and hazardous object removal. This program will develop a policy and standardized criteria for barriers and selection of projects. 31 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019 - 2024 TIP No. 5 Project Title:Intersection Safety & Mobility Program Community Planning Area:Citywide Fund: Functional Classification:various Project: Project Length:N/A Contact: Project Description: Justification: Status: Changes: Funded:Unfunded: Spent 2017 2018 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Expenditures: Planning - - - - - - - - - - Preliminary Engineering 314,000 - 44,000 270,000 45,000 45,000 45,000 45,000 45,000 45,000 R-O-W (includes Admin)- - - - - - - - - - Construction 1,380,000 99,652 30,348 1,250,000 150,000 100,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 Construction Services 356,000 - 26,000 330,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 Post Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenses 2,050,000 99,652 100,348 1,850,000 250,000 200,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 Resources: Vehicle Fuel Tax - - - - - - - - - - Business & Occupation Share 200,000 99,652 100,348 - - - - - - - Fund Balance - - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (1)- - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (2)- - - - - - - - - - Mitigation 450,000 - - 450,000 250,000 200,000 - - - - Bonds / LID's Formed - - - - - - - - - - Other (1)- - - - - - - - - - Other (2)- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Undetermined 1,400,000 - - 1,400,000 - - 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 Total Sources 2,050,000 99,652 100,348 1,850,000 250,000 200,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 650,000 1,400,000 Project Expenditures & Resources Programmed Programmed Pre-2019 Six-Year Program Intersection Safety & Mobility Program 317 122601 Chris Barnes 425-430-7220 This program will install new traffic signals, software systems to improve traffic signal timing operations, central signal system upgrades or make improvements to existing signals identified by the Transportation Systems' Traffic Signal Priority List. The Priority List is determined by citizen concerns, intersection safety, mobility needs, and intersections that meet MUTCD traffic signal warrants. Historically, one traffic signal is designed and constructed every two-three years to meet safety and mobility needs. This program budgets for projects needed to meet increasing demand, and the need for signalized traffic control. Elements used to prioritize project intersections may include vehicular approach volumes, accident analysis, signal-warrant analysis, and pedestrian volume. Preliminary engineering and design will begin for SW 41st St. and Oakesdale Ave SW in 2018 and construction completed in 2020. 32 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019 - 2024 TIP No. 6 Project Title:Traffic Safety Program Community Planning Area:Citywide Fund: Functional Classification:various Project: Project Length:various Contact: Project Description: Justification: Status: Changes: Funded:Unfunded: Spent 2017 2018 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Expenditures: Planning 34,905 34,905 - - - - - - - - Preliminary Engineering 139,000 - 19,000 120,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 R-O-W (includes Admin)- - - - - - - - - - Construction 948,904 160,904 68,000 720,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 Construction Services 63,000 - 3,000 60,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 Post Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Other (Trans to 503)11,000 11,000 - - - - - - - - Total Expenses 1,196,809 206,809 90,000 900,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 Resources: Vehicle Fuel Tax - - - - - - - - - - Business & Occupation Share 345,000 55,000 90,000 200,000 130,000 70,000 - - - - Fund Balance 113,259 103,259 - 10,000 10,000 - - - - - Grants Awarded (1)- - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (2)- - - - - - - - - - Mitigation 95,000 5,000 - 90,000 10,000 80,000 - - - - Bonds / LID's Formed - - - - - - - - - - Other (Landing Reimb)43,550 43,550 - - - - - - - - Other (2)- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Undetermined 600,000 - - 600,000 - - 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 Total Sources 1,196,809 206,809 90,000 900,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 596,809 600,000 Project Expenditures & Resources Programmed Programmed Pre-2019 Six-Year Program Traffic Safety Program 317 122115 Chris Barnes 425-430-7220 This ongoing yearly program provides funding for special small-scale traffic safety improvements that are identified and require materials, labor or equipment. This program includes converting school zone signs to electronic operation, installation of pedestrian safety traffic signals including Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFB), and Hawk hybrid beacon signals, bulbouts and radar speed signs for traffic calming. Historically, this level of traffic safety improvements are required on an annual basis. This program budgets for safety projects to address these needs. Projects are typically identified through citizen concerns, analysis of accident records or observation by City Traffic Operations personnel. School speed zone flashing beacons and speed radar signs will be installed for traffic calming. 33 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019 - 2024 TIP No. 7 Project Title:Traffic Operation Devices Program Community Planning Area:Citywide Fund: Functional Classification:N/A Project: Project Length:N/A Contact: Project Description: Justification: Status: Changes: Funded:Unfunded: Spent 2017 2018 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Expenditures: Planning - - - - - - - - - - Preliminary Engineering - - - - - - - - - - R-O-W (includes Admin)- - - - - - - - - - Construction 999,000 135,763 143,237 720,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Post Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenses 999,000 135,763 143,237 720,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 Resources: Vehicle Fuel Tax - - - - - - - - - - Business & Occupation Share 902,000 62,000 120,000 720,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 Fund Balance 97,000 73,763 23,237 - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (1)- - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (2)- - - - - - - - - - Mitigation - - - - - - - - - - Bonds / LID's Formed - - - - - - - - - - Other (1)- - - - - - - - - - Other (2)- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Undetermined - - - - - - - - - - Total Sources 999,000 135,763 143,237 720,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 999,000 - Project Expenditures & Resources Programmed Programmed Pre-2019 Six-Year Program Traffic Operation Devices Program 317 122904 Eric Cutshall 425-430-7423 The City of Renton owns and operates 135 traffic signals, 4800+ street lights, 700+ lane miles and 12,000+ signs. This program replaces failed video detection cameras, signal heads, signal cabinets, UPS batteries and LED indications as needed based on the findings from yearly maintenance programs. This program also provides for new/replacement of signs that are obsolete, faded or that do not meet retro reflectivity requirements, replacement of damaged luminaire and signal poles. This program also replaces pavement markings and failed C-curbing with a more maintenance friendly composite curbing. Most of Renton's traffic signals and UPS systems require extensive maintenance and replacement programs to keep traffic signals operating as efficiently as possible. Signage requires a maintenance program to maintain retro reflectivity requirements. Pavement deterioration has increased the number of failed loops throughout the City and as loops fail they are replaced with video detection cameras and associated equipment. Ongoing based on findings of yearly maintenance programs and engineering work orders. 34 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019 - 2024 TIP No. 8 Project Title:Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Program Community Planning Area:Citywide Fund: Functional Classification:N/A Project: Project Length:N/A Contact: Project Description: Justification: Status: Changes: Funded:Unfunded: Spent 2017 2018 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Expenditures: Planning - - - - - - - - - - Preliminary Engineering 65,000 - 5,000 60,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 R-O-W (includes Admin)- - - - - - - - - - Construction 300,000 38,015 21,985 240,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 Construction Services 65,000 - 5,000 60,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 Post Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenses 430,000 38,015 31,985 360,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 Resources: Vehicle Fuel Tax - - - - - - - - - - Business & Occupation Share 60,000 30,000 30,000 - - - - - - - Fund Balance 10,000 8,015 1,985 - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (1)- - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (2)- - - - - - - - - - Mitigation 120,000 - - 120,000 60,000 60,000 - - - - Bonds / LID's Formed - - - - - - - - - - Other (1)- - - - - - - - - - Other (2)- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Undetermined 240,000 - - 240,000 - - 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 Total Sources 430,000 38,015 31,985 360,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 190,000 240,000 Project Expenditures & Resources Programmed Programmed Pre-2019 Six-Year Program Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Program An additional $30,000/yr has been allocated to this program. 317 122162 Eric Cutshall 425-430-7423 Provides for improvements to the operational efficiency of the roadway system, including development and implementation of signal coordination programs, Adaptive Signal Control, installation of fiber communication, PTZ cameras, Radar signs, LED signs, transit signal priority, Intelligent Traffic Systems (ITS) Master Plan and signal improvements such as protective/permissive phasing. Improving the capacity and efficiency of the existing roadway system is a cost effective element of the transportation program. Installing fiber communication creates higher bandwidths so PTZ cameras can be installed. Fiber optic communication provides the Traffic Management Center with real time traffic conditions, adaptive signal control and ability to view video detection systems. The goal is to have fiber installed to all 135 traffic signals. This program is currently in the process of installing fiber communications and expanding adaptive signal control which affects 70% of the City's traffic signals. 35 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019 - 2024 TIP No. 9 Project Title:Sidewalk Rehabilitation and Replacement Program Community Planning Area:Citywide Fund: Functional Classification:various Project: Project Length:N/A Contact: Project Description: Justification: Status: Changes: Funded:Unfunded: Spent 2017 2018 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Expenditures: Planning 204 204 - - - - - - - - Preliminary Engineering 61,822 61,822 - - - - - - - - R-O-W (includes Admin)- - - - - - - - - - Construction 1,498,537 361,679 486,858 650,000 100,000 110,000 110,000 110,000 110,000 110,000 Construction Services 11,467 11,467 - - - - - - - - Post Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenses 1,572,030 435,172 486,858 650,000 100,000 110,000 110,000 110,000 110,000 110,000 Resources: Vehicle Fuel Tax - - - - - - - - - - Business & Occupation Share 850,000 100,000 100,000 650,000 100,000 110,000 110,000 110,000 110,000 110,000 Fund Balance 722,030 335,172 386,858 - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (1)- - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (2)- - - - - - - - - - Mitigation - - - - - - - - - - Bonds / LID's Formed - - - - - - - - - - Other (1)- - - - - - - - - - Other (2)- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Undetermined - - - - - - - - - - Total Sources 1,572,030 435,172 486,858 650,000 100,000 110,000 110,000 110,000 110,000 110,000 1,572,030 - Project Expenditures & Resources Programmed Programmed Pre-2019 Six-Year Program Sidewalk Rehabilitation and Replacement Program The 2019 program funding will be used to repair the sidewalk along Rainier Ave between S 2nd St and Tobin. 317 122801 Michelle Faltaous 425-430-2270 This program provides for the replacement of existing curb and gutter, sidewalks, and curb ramps where such facilities have deteriorated or have been damaged. In order to address deficiencies and provide safe and convenient non-motorized facilities for pedestrians in neighborhoods, the City must have a program to analyze, repair or replace damaged or deteriorated curb and gutter, sidewalks, and curb ramps. There are some places where curb ramps do not exist or are not to current ADA standards and they will be upgraded through this program. Staff continue to receive location requests from the public and other staff for review and prioritization. 36 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019 - 2024 TIP No. 10 Project Title:Bridge Inspection & Repair Program Community Planning Area:Citywide Fund: Functional Classification:N/A Project: Project Length:N/A Contact: Project Description: Justification: Status: Changes: Funded:Unfunded: Spent 2017 2018 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Expenditures: Planning - - - - - - - - - - Preliminary Engineering 385,056 88,056 87,000 210,000 30,000 20,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 R-O-W (includes Admin)- - - - - - - - - - Construction 162,000 - 15,000 147,000 20,000 17,000 20,000 35,000 20,000 35,000 Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Post Construction Services 218,000 - 35,000 183,000 40,000 13,000 40,000 25,000 40,000 25,000 Other - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenses 765,056 88,056 137,000 540,000 90,000 50,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 Resources: Vehicle Fuel Tax - - - - - - - - - - Business & Occupation Share 450,000 50,000 60,000 340,000 90,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 Fund Balance 115,056 38,056 77,000 - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (FEMA)- - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (State Share)- - - - - - - - - - Mitigation - - - - - - - - - - Bonds / LID's Formed - - - - - - - - - - Other (1)- - - - - - - - - - Other (2)- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Undetermined 200,000 - - 200,000 - - 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 Total Sources 765,056 88,056 137,000 540,000 90,000 50,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 565,056 200,000 Project Expenditures & Resources Programmed Programmed Pre-2019 Six-Year Program Bridge Inspection & Repair Program 317 120106 Derek Akesson 425-430-7337 The Transportation Division inspects 27 bridge structures owned by the City of Renton, every two years. The purpose of these inspections is to monitor the condition of bridge elements in order to identify structural deficiencies in need of repair. The goals of the program are to keep the bridges open and safe for public use, preserve bridge infrastructure by maximizing the useful lie through active maintenance, retrofitting and rehabilitation, and replace bridges with reliable new structures when repair or rehabilitation is not feasible. Per Federal Regulations, the City is required to perform a bridge condition inspection for all bridges, located in the public right-of-way and open for public use, that span 20-ft or more. WSDOT recommends condition inspections be performed on all short span and pedestrian bridges, located with the public right-of-way and open for public use. In order to qualify for Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) bridge funding, the City must stay in compliance with the Federal Regulations. Funds shown under construction are for minor repairs to bridge structures. 37 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019 - 2024 TIP No. 11 Project Title:Barrier Free Transition Plan Implementation Community Planning Area:Citywide Fund: Functional Classification:N/A Project: Project Length:N/A Contact: Project Description: Justification: Status: Changes: Funded:Unfunded: Spent 2017 2018 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Expenditures: Planning 65,000 - 5,000 60,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 Preliminary Engineering - - - - - - - - - - R-O-W (includes Admin)- - - - - - - - - - Construction 416,000 5,171 46,829 364,000 44,000 64,000 64,000 64,000 64,000 64,000 Construction Services 39,000 - 3,000 36,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 Post Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenses 520,000 5,171 54,829 460,000 60,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 Resources: Vehicle Fuel Tax - - - - - - - - - - Business & Occupation Share 175,171 5,171 30,000 140,000 60,000 80,000 - - - - Fund Balance 24,829 - 24,829 - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (1)- - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (2)- - - - - - - - - - Mitigation - - - - - - - - - - Bonds / LID's Formed - - - - - - - - - - Other (1)- - - - - - - - - - Other (2)- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Undetermined 320,000 - - 320,000 - - 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 Total Sources 520,000 5,171 54,829 460,000 60,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 200,000 320,000 Project Expenditures & Resources Programmed Programmed Pre-2019 Six-Year Program Barrier Free Transition Plan Implementation An additional $30,000 for 2019 and $40,000/yr for years 2020-2024 have been allocated to this program. 317 122705 Dan Hasty 425-430-7217 This program provides funding for designing and building features on an "as needed" basis in response to individual requests to improve access for individuals with special needs. A project list has been developed based upon sites identified in the Transition Plan section of the City of Renton Comprehensive Citywide Sidewalk Study. This program implements projects that support the City's effort to transition pedestrian facilities within the right-of-way into conformity with provisions contained in the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Guidelines. The ADA Transition Plan has been adopted on May 18 2015. A programmatic approach is required to ensure compliance with federal law. Maintenance of the GIS database to continue Self Evaluation of existing curb ramps, newly constructed curb ramps, annexations, capital improvement projects, and/or physical condition changes is ongoing. 38 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019 - 2024 TIP No. 12 Project Title:Project Development & Pre-Design Program Community Planning Area:Citywide Fund: Functional Classification:N/A Project: Project Length:N/A Contact: Project Description: Justification: Status: Changes: Funded:Unfunded: Spent 2017 2018 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Expenditures: Planning 766,795 77,233 89,562 600,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 Preliminary Engineering 343,204 13,204 30,000 300,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 R-O-W (includes Admin)- - - - - - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Post Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenses 1,110,000 90,438 119,562 900,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 Resources: Vehicle Fuel Tax - - - - - - - - - - Business & Occupation Share 1,110,000 90,438 119,562 900,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 Fund Balance - - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (1)- - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (2)- - - - - - - - - - Mitigation - - - - - - - - - - Bonds / LID's Formed - - - - - - - - - - Other (1)- - - - - - - - - - Other (2)- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Undetermined - - - - - - - - - - Total Sources 1,110,000 90,438 119,562 900,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 1,110,000 - Project Expenditures & Resources Programmed Programmed Pre-2019 Six-Year Program Project Development & Pre-Design Program The Trails and Bicycle Master Plan Update is anticipated to be completed in the end of 2018. Once the Trails and Bicycle Master Plan is complete, staff will work on updating the Comprehensive Citywide Walkway Study (last updated in 2009). 317 122150 Vangie Garcia 425-430-7319 Perform critical activities needed for the development of transportation projects that will best serve the needs of Renton and be eligible for grant applications. Also provides for the monitoring of active grant projects for compliance with State and Federal laws, regulations and specifications. Other critical activities to develop future capital improvement projects consist of but are not limited to project scoping, cost estimates, pre-design, interlocal agreements, analyses of existing and projected transportation problems, local and regional mobility goals and deficiency analysis. This program includes small studies funding. Transportation, in partnership with Parks Division is updating the Trail and Bicycle Master Plan. 39 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019 - 2024 TIP No. 13 Project Title:Arterial Circulation Program Community Planning Area:Citywide Fund: Functional Classification:N/A Project: Project Length:N/A Contact: Project Description: Justification: Status: Changes: Funded:Unfunded: Spent 2017 2018 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Expenditures: Planning 1,095,000 53,454 146,546 895,000 145,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 Preliminary Engineering - - - - - - - - - - R-O-W (includes Admin)- - - - - - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Post Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenses 1,095,000 53,454 146,546 895,000 145,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 Resources: Vehicle Fuel Tax - - - - - - - - - - Business & Occupation Share 1,093,454 53,454 145,000 895,000 145,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 Fund Balance 1,546 - 1,546 - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (1)- - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (2)- - - - - - - - - - Mitigation - - - - - - - - - - Bonds / LID's Formed - - - - - - - - - - Other (1)- - - - - - - - - - Other (2)- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Undetermined - - - - - - - - - - Total Sources 1,095,000 53,454 146,546 895,000 145,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 1,095,000 - Project Expenditures & Resources Programmed Programmed Pre-2019 Six-Year Program Arterial Circulation Program Transportation will develop a work plan to create a Transit Master Plan. 317 120029 Vangie Garcia 425-430-7319 This program provides for the short and long-range planning and traffic analyses required to evaluate and update proposed transportation improvements projects, to assess the impacts of new development proposals, and to recommend local and regional transportation system improvements for all modes of travel. This program also covers programmatic activities to maintain eligibility for grant funding, such as assuring that project specifications and management comply with current State and Federal standards and regulations, Title VI reporting and ADA Transition Plan implementation. This program will also provide coordination with the I-405 project team, to assure it provides the maximum benefits and minimum problems for Renton's transportation system. State and Federal government regulations and legislation, the Growth Management Act (GMA), and the Puget Sound Regional Council Vision 2040 highlight the increasing importance of making sure that local and regional transportation plans are coordinated to the benefit of Renton make ongoing multi-modal planning a high priority need. In order to meet the City's Business Plan Goals, transportation will play a key role with public and private partnerships to promote economic vitality. This project will fund the ongoing planning work which will lead to refinement and/or adjustment of the of improvement projects on the arterial network identified in the Transportation Element of the City's 2015 Comprehensive Plan and other long-range planning documents. 40 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019 - 2024 TIP No. 14 Project Title:1% For The Arts Program Community Planning Area:N/A Fund: Functional Classification:N/A Project: Project Length:N/A Contact: Project Description: Justification: Status: Changes: Funded:Unfunded: Spent 2017 2018 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Expenditures: Planning 133,823 28,823 15,000 90,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 Preliminary Engineering - - - - - - - - - - R-O-W (includes Admin)- - - - - - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Post Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenses 133,823 28,823 15,000 90,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 Resources: Vehicle Fuel Tax - - - - - - - - - - Business & Occupation Share 133,823 28,823 15,000 90,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 Fund Balance - - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (1)- - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (2)- - - - - - - - - - Mitigation - - - - - - - - - - Bonds / LID's Formed - - - - - - - - - - Other (1)- - - - - - - - - - Other (2)- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Undetermined - - - - - - - - - - Total Sources 133,823 28,823 15,000 90,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 133,823 - Project Expenditures & Resources Programmed Programmed Pre-2019 Six-Year Program 1% For The Arts Program 317 122112 Heather Gregersen 425-430-7393 Funding is tied to the calculated share of eligible types of transportation projects and transportation funding subject to the City's 1% for the Arts Program. All gateway project proposals under this program are subject to approval of the Arts Commission. This program transfers funds to Fund 125, which is being managed by the Department of Community and Economic Development. Program is now based on actual design and construction costs. $11,151 was transferred in 2013 for 2012 capital expenditures. $10,454 was transferred in 2014 for 2013 capital expenditures. $9,344 was transferred in 2015 for 2014 capital expenditures. $16,767 was transferred in 2016 for 2015 expenditures. $28,823 was transferred in 2017 for 2016 expenditures. 41 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019 - 2024 TIP No. 15 Project Title:Bronson Way Bridge - Seismic Retrofit and Painting Community Planning Area:City Center Fund: Functional Classification:N/A Project: Project Length:N/A Contact: Project Description: Justification: Status: Changes: Funded:Unfunded: Pre-2018 2018 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Expenditures: Planning - - - - - - - - - - Preliminary Engineering 620,000 - 70,000 550,000 420,000 130,000 - - - - R-O-W (includes Admin)- - - - - - - - - - Construction 1,950,000 - - 1,950,000 - 1,950,000 - - - - Construction Services 430,000 - - 430,000 - 430,000 - - - - Post Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenses 3,000,000 - 70,000 2,930,000 420,000 2,510,000 - - - - Resources: Vehicle Fuel Tax - - - - - - - - - - Business & Occupation Share - - - - - - - - - - Fund Balance - - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (FHWA Bridge 3,000,000 - 70,000 2,930,000 420,000 2,510,000 - - - - Grants Awarded (2)- - - - - - - - - - Mitigation - - - - - - - - - - Bonds / LID's Formed - - - - - - - - - - Other (1)- - - - - - - - - - Other (2)- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Undetermined - - - - - - - - - - Total Sources 3,000,000 - 70,000 2,930,000 420,000 2,510,000 - - - - 3,000,000 - Project Expenditures & Resources Programmed Programmed Pre-2019 Six-Year Program Bronson Way Bridge - Seismic Retrofit and Painting 317 NEW Derek Akesson 425-430-7337 The Bronson Way Bridge was built by WSDOT in 1939. Ownership was transferred to the City in January 2018 as part of the SR-900 turnback agreement. It is a three span bridge that crosses over the Cedar River. The project will remove the existing paint from the steel girders, repair corrosion damage and apply a new protective paint system. The project will also perform a seismic analysis and retrofit along with other improvements. The main span is carried by steel girders. The girders are coated with paint to protect the steel from corrosion. Corrosion causes section loss which results in a reduced load carrying capacity of the girders. The existing paint is failing. The bridge is located in a zone of moderate to high liquefication susceptibility during seismic events. New project. In April 2018, the project was awarded $3,000,000 of Washington State funding (2018 Supplemental Transportation Budget) to perform a seismic retrofit and painting of the bridge. No local match is required. 42 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019 - 2024 TIP No. 16 Project Title:Duvall Ave NE - NE 7th St to Sunset Blvd NE Community Planning Area:Highlands & East Plateau Fund: Functional Classification:Minor Arterial Project: Project Length:0.67 mi Contact: Project Description: Justification: Status: Changes: Funded:Unfunded: Pre-2018 2018 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Expenditures: Planning - - - - - - - - - - Preliminary Engineering 1,044,136 353,250 335,435 355,451 355,451 - - - - - R-O-W (includes Admin)- - - - - - - - - - Construction 4,559,488 - 3,576,000 983,488 983,488 - - - - - Construction Services 900,200 - 727,000 173,200 173,200 - - - - - Post Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenses 6,503,824 353,250 4,638,435 1,512,139 1,512,139 - - - - - Resources: Vehicle Fuel Tax - - - - - - - - - - Business & Occupation Share 90,000 - 60,000 30,000 30,000 - - - - - Fund Balance & Held Reserve 649,121 90,838 447,658 110,625 110,625 - - - - - Grants Awarded (TIB 74.285%)3,468,289 262,412 3,205,877 - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (DOE 75%)1,223,939 - 174,900 1,049,039 1,049,039 - - - - - Mitigation 1,072,475 - 750,000 322,475 322,475 - - - - - Bonds / LID's Formed - - - - - - - - - - Other (Water Dept)- - - - - - - - - - Other (2)- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Undetermined - - - - - - - - - - Total Sources 6,503,824 353,250 4,638,435 1,512,139 1,512,139 - - - - - 6,503,824 - Project Expenditures & Resources Programmed Programmed Pre-2019 Six-Year Program Duvall Ave NE - NE 7th St to Sunset Blvd NE The City was awarded a TIB grant in the amount of $3,468,289 (2015) for the roadway reconstruction between NE 10th St and NE 12th St, curb, gutter, sidewalk and streetlights on the west side and channelization from NE 12th St to south of the intersection with NE Sunset Blvd. The City was also awarded a Department of Ecology (DOE) grant (2018) in the amount of $1,223,939 for water quality improvements via the installation of water quality treatment facilities. A future phase will install non-motorized improvements along the east side of Duvall Ave NE, from NE 7th St to NE 12th St. This project is anticipated to be ready for construction in early 2019. 317 122702 Flora Lee 425-430-7303 Reconstruction/resurfacing of roadway, including new pavement, curb, gutter, sidewalk, street lights, storm drainage, channelization and bike lanes from NE 7th St to Sunset Blvd NE. Complete roadway improvements, bicycle lanes and sidewalks on Duvall Ave NE, from NE 7th St to Sunset Blvd NE. Condition of the existing roadway pavement requires road reconstruction in segments of the roadway. Project will enhance safety for pedestrians, bicyclists and vehicular along this corridor. 43 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019 - 2024 TIP No. 17 Project Title:Houser Way Bridge - Seismic Retrofit and Painting Community Planning Area:City Center Fund: Functional Classification:N/A Project: Project Length:N/A Contact: Project Description: Justification: Status: Changes: Funded:Unfunded: Pre-2018 2018 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Expenditures: Planning - - - - - - - - - - Preliminary Engineering 620,000 - 70,000 550,000 420,000 130,000 - - - - R-O-W (includes Admin)50,000 - - 50,000 50,000 - - - - - Construction 2,189,450 - - 2,189,450 - 2,189,450 - - - - Construction Services 435,000 - - 435,000 - 212,450 222,550 - - - Post Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenses 3,294,450 - 70,000 3,224,450 470,000 2,531,900 222,550 - - - Resources: Vehicle Fuel Tax - - - - - - - - - - Business & Occupation Share - - - - - - - - - - Fund Balance 72,900 - 9,450 63,450 63,450 - - - - - Grants Awarded (FHWA Bridge 2,999,000 - 60,550 2,938,450 406,550 2,531,900 - - - - Grants Awarded (2)- - - - - - - - - - Mitigation - - - - - - - - - - Bonds / LID's Formed - - - - - - - - - - Other (1)- - - - - - - - - - Other (2)- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Undetermined 222,550 - - 222,550 - - 222,550 - - - Total Sources 3,294,450 - 70,000 3,224,450 470,000 2,531,900 222,550 - - - 3,071,900 222,550 Project Expenditures & Resources Programmed Programmed Pre-2019 Six-Year Program Houser Way Bridge - Seismic Retrofit and Painting 317 NEW Derek Akesson 425-430-7337 The Houser Way Bridge was built by the City of Renton in 1960. It is a three span bridge that crosses over the Cedar River. The project will remove the existing paint from the steel girders, repair corrosion damage and apply a new protective paint system. The project will also perform a seismic analysis and retrofit and replace/upgrade the bridge rails along with other improvements. The main span is carried by steel girders. The girders are coated with paint to protect the steel from corrosion. Corrosion causes section loss which results in a reduced load carrying capacity of the girders. The existing paint is failing. The bridge is located in a zone of moderate to high liquification susceptibility during seismic events. The bridge rail has been damaged. New project. In late 2017, the project was awarded a Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) grant of $2,999,000 to perform a seismic retrofit and painting of the bridge. A 13.5% local match is required for Preliminary Engineering and ROW. If construction is authorized by December 2020, the project is eligible for 100% FHWA funding for the eligible costs. 44 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019 - 2024 TIP No. 18 Project Title:Lake Washington Loop Trail Community Planning Area:City Center Fund: Functional Classification:varies Project: Project Length:N/A Contact: Project Description: Justification: Status: Changes: Funded:Unfunded: Pre-2018 2018 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Expenditures: Planning - - - - - - - - - - Preliminary Engineering 2,261,301 597,219 314,082 1,350,000 - - 1,200,000 150,000 - R-O-W (includes Admin)670,000 - 670,000 - - - - - - - Construction 4,880,000 - 530,000 4,350,000 300,000 1,350,000 - - 200,000 2,500,000 Construction Services 1,492,000 - 27,000 1,465,000 40,000 75,000 - - 600,000 750,000 Post Construction Services - - - - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenses 9,303,301 597,219 1,541,082 7,165,000 340,000 1,425,000 - 1,200,000 950,000 3,250,000 Resources: Vehicle Fuel Tax - - - - - - - - - - Business & Occupation Share 124,984 49,984 - 75,000 - 75,000 - - - - Fund Balance + Held Reserve - - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (TAP)346,000 329,855 16,145 - Grants Awarded (STP ROW)575,000 - 575,000 - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (Ped/Bike Program - PE Phase 3)426,000 217,380 208,620 - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (Ped/Bike Program - CN)430,000 - 370,659 59,341 59,341 - - - - - Grants Awarded (STP - CN Phase 3 1,694,278 370,658 1,323,620 280,659 1,042,961 - - - - Mitigation 307,039 - - 307,039 - 307,039 - - - - Bonds / LID's Formed - - - - - - - - - - Other (1)- - - - - - - - - Other (2)- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Undetermined 5,400,000 - - 5,400,000 - - 1,200,000 950,000 3,250,000 Total Sources 9,303,301 597,219 1,541,082 7,165,000 340,000 1,425,000 - 1,200,000 950,000 3,250,000 3,903,301 5,400,000 Project Expenditures & Resources Programmed Programmed Pre-2019 Six-Year Program Lake Washington Loop Trail Phase 3 construction is expected to start in the fall or winter of 2019. 317 122802 Michelle Faltaous 425-430-7301 The project will construct approximately 1.3 miles of pedestrian and bicycle facilities to complete a gap in the Lake Washington trail system. Improvements include a 12-foot wide combined pedestrian/bicycle path, a landscaped buffer separating the path from the travelled roadway, pedestrian level lighting. For the segment located along Airport Way, the facilities will include a bike track and sidewalk, which will involve removing one westbound lane of traffic on Airport Way. The project will separate pedestrians and bicyclists from the vehicular traffic, enhancing safety and encouraging residents to use active transportation modes. The City was awarded the following grants: TAP = $346,000 (2013); STP Non-Motorized = $575,000 (2015); Ped & Bike = $426,000 (2015); STP = $1,694,278; Ped & Bike Safety = $ 430,000 (under recommendation for 2017). Construction has been implemented in phases, with Phases 1 and 2 completed. Phase 3 (Logan Ave N/Cedar River to Rainier Ave N) design is underway.Phase 4 is from Airport Way/Rainier Ave N intersection to north City limits (programmed in 2020-2022). 45 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019 - 2024 TIP No. 19 Project Title:NE Sunset Boulevard (SR 900) Corridor Improvements Community Planning Area:Highlands Fund: Functional Classification:Principal Project: Project Length:3.0 mi Contact: Project Description: Justification: Status: Changes: Funded:Unfunded: Pre-2018 2018 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Expenditures: Planning 200,000 200,000 - - - - - - - - Preliminary Engineering 3,500,833 501,831 990,002 2,009,000 209,000 - 1,000,000 600,000 200,000 - R-O-W (includes Admin)3,300,000 - - 3,300,000 250,000 2,750,000 300,000 - - - Construction 20,000,000 - - 20,000,000 - - 5,000,000 5,000,000 5,000,000 5,000,000 Construction Services 5,000,000 - - 5,000,000 - - 1,250,000 1,250,000 1,250,000 1,250,000 Post Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenses 32,000,833 701,831 990,002 30,309,000 459,000 2,750,000 7,550,000 6,850,000 6,450,000 6,250,000 Resources: Vehicle Fuel Tax - - - - - - - - - - Business & Occupation Share 312,866 2,364 277,527 32,975 32,975 - - - - - Fund Balance + Held Reserve 324,032 74,032 250,000 - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (STP/CMAQ)1,313,935 425,435 462,475 426,025 426,025 - - - - - Grants Awarded (2)- - - - - - - - - - Mitigation - - - - - - - - - - Bonds / LID's Formed - - - - - - - - - - Other (REET)200,000 200,000 - - - - - - - - Other (2)- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Undetermined 29,850,000 - - 29,850,000 - 2,750,000 7,550,000 6,850,000 6,450,000 6,250,000 Total Sources 32,000,833 701,831 990,002 30,309,000 459,000 2,750,000 7,550,000 6,850,000 6,450,000 6,250,000 2,150,833 29,850,000 Project Expenditures & Resources Programmed Programmed Pre-2019 Six-Year Program NE Sunset Boulevard (SR 900) Corridor Improvements 30% Design of the corridor improvements is completed. WSDOT is currently reviewing the channelization plan. Project will be on hold until ROW funding can be identified. 317 122902 Keith Woolley 425-430-7318 This project will seek to address pedestrian, transit and bicycle needs. This corridor needs a series of key improvements to improve traffic operations such as channelization, traffic signal modifications, signal treatments, possible queue jumps, access management through installation of medians. The corridor limits are from I-405 on the west and to the east City limits. This corridor has strong potential for non-motorized and transit usage. The Sunset area is experiencing residential and retail growth. The Sunset Area Planned Action EIS prepared in 2011 delineated transportation needs along Sunset Blvd from N Park Dr to Monroe Ave NE (estimated at $33M). The project has received a STP/CMAQ grant in the amount of $1,313,935 for design and is on the PSRC contingency list for ROW funding. Transportation will continue to look into other funding sources, such as TIB, for the ROW and construction phases. 46 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019 - 2024 TIP No. 20 Project Title:Park Avenue North Extension Community Planning Area:City Center Fund: Functional Classification:N/A Project: Project Length:0.23 mi Contact: Project Description: Justification: Status: Changes: Funded:Unfunded: Pre-2018 2018 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Expenditures: Planning - - - - - - - - - - Preliminary Engineering 1,000,000 100,091 649,909 250,000 250,000 - - - - - R-O-W (includes Admin)1,500,000 - 300,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 - - - - - Construction 4,000,000 - - 4,000,000 3,500,000 500,000 - - - - Construction Services 1,000,000 - - 1,000,000 875,000 125,000 - - - - Post Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Other (BNSF/Gate)- - - - - - - - - - Total Expenses 7,500,000 100,091 949,909 6,450,000 5,825,000 625,000 - - - - Resources: Vehicle Fuel Tax - - - - - - - - - - Business & Occupation Share - - - - - - - - - - Fund Balance - - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (1)- - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (2)- - - - - - - - - - Mitigation 100,091 100,091 - - - - - - - - Bonds / LID's Formed - - - - - - - - - - Other (LRF)7,399,909 - 949,909 6,450,000 5,825,000 625,000 - - - - Other (Developer)- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Undetermined - - - - - - - - - - Total Sources 7,500,000 100,091 949,909 6,450,000 5,825,000 625,000 - - - - Park Avenue North Extension 7,500,000 - Project Expenditures & Resources Programmed Programmed Pre-2019 Six-Year Program 317 122190 Hebe Bernardo 425-430-7232 The project will extend Park Ave N to the north of Logan Ave N, to provide access to Southport, PSE property and The Boeing Company. Improvements include bicycle and pedestrian facilities, illumination, landscaping. With the additional development growth in the North Renton area, which includes The Landing and the Southport residential/hotel/office development, this project will construct improvements to improve accessibility. The design work will be completed in 2019 and the project is scheduled to go to bid in June of 2019. 47 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019 - 2024 TIP No. 21 Project Title:Rainier Ave S/N Phase 4 - S 3rd Street to NW 3rd Pl Community Planning Area:City Center Fund: Functional Classification:Principal Project: Project Length:0.51 mi Contact: Project Description: Justification: Status: Changes: Funded:Unfunded: Pre-2018 2018 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Expenditures: Planning - - - - - - - - - - Preliminary Engineering 3,000,000 543,395 1,505,282 951,323 500,000 451,323 - - - - R-O-W (includes Admin)3,500,000 - - 3,500,000 1,000,000 1,500,000 1,000,000 - - - Construction 10,500,000 - - 10,500,000 - - 6,000,000 4,500,000 - - Construction Services 3,300,000 - - 3,300,000 - - 1,800,000 1,350,000 150,000 - Post Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenses 20,300,000 543,395 1,505,282 18,251,323 1,500,000 1,951,323 8,800,000 5,850,000 150,000 - Resources: Vehicle Fuel Tax - - - - - - - - - - Business & Occupation Share 709,600 56,387 103,213 550,000 - - 100,000 450,000 - - Fund Balance 239,552 39,552 100,000 100,000 - - 100,000 - - - Grants Awarded (STP PE)2,600,000 447,456 1,302,069 850,475 750,475 100,000 - - - - Grants Awarded (STP ROW)3,000,000 - - 3,000,000 442,000 1,258,000 1,300,000 - - - Grants Awarded (STP CN)4,500,000 - - 4,500,000 - - 4,500,000 - - - Mitigation 2,695,848 - - 2,695,848 307,525 593,323 700,000 945,000 150,000 - Bonds / LID's Formed - - - - - - - - - - Other (TIB Grant)*6,555,000 - - 6,555,000 - - 2,100,000 4,455,000 - - - - - - - - - - - - Undetermined - - - - - - - - - - Total Sources 20,300,000 543,395 1,505,282 18,251,323 1,500,000 1,951,323 8,800,000 5,850,000 150,000 - 20,300,000 - Project Expenditures & Resources Programmed Programmed Pre-2019 Six-Year Program Rainier Ave S/N Phase 4 - S 3rd Street to NW 3rd Pl Phase 4 of the Rainier Ave S Corridor Improvements has been separated into two phases due to cost and feasibility. Currently, there is a Renton Airport Master Plan process that may affect the alignment of Airport Way, which is at the northern end of Phase 4. This grant request is to fund the construction of Phase 4A from S 3rd St to S Tobin St. The City of Renton will construct Phase 4B after the Airport Master Plan is final and approved. *Transportation plans to also apply for a TIB grant for the construction of Phase 4A. Previous phases of Rainier were constructed with TIB funds but if this phase does not receive TIB funding, the City will use local funds to construct the project. 317 122195 Michelle Faltaous 425-430-7301 This is Phase 4 of the Rainier Ave Corridor Improvements, and will extend the improvements from S 3rd St to NW 3rd Pl. Project elements include sidewalk widening with streetscaping, adding pedestrian-scale illumination, adding a pedestrian actuated traffic signal, upgrading existing traffic signals, transit facility improvements, planted buffer strips and landscaped medians. Also includes a ped/bike path on the east side of Rainier Ave N, between Airport Way and NW 3rd Pl. Rainier Ave is a critical corridor in central Renton with existing operational problems and in need of infrastructure enhancements to provide greater ease of non-motorized and transit-based travel. It also provides improved access to the Renton Airport and Boeing's Renton Plant. Improvements will enhance traffic flow and reduce accidents. A STP grant in the amount of $2,600,000 was awarded (2014) for design of Phase 4 and design is currently underway. Additional STP grants were awarded for Right-of-Way for $3,000,000 and for construction of Phase 4A for $4,500,000. 48 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019 - 2024 TIP No. 22 Project Title:Renton Connector Community Planning Area:City Center Fund: Functional Classification:Urban Collector Project: Project Length:0.5 mi Contact: Project Description: Justification: Status: Changes: Funded:Unfunded: Pre-2018 2018 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Expenditures: Planning - - - - - - - - - - Preliminary Engineering 1,500,000 - - 1,500,000 - - 278,700 621,300 600,000 - R-O-W (includes Admin)- - - - - - - - - - Construction 12,213,000 - - 12,213,000 - - - - 3,363,000 8,850,000 Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Post Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenses 13,713,000 - - 13,713,000 - - 278,700 621,300 3,963,000 8,850,000 Resources: Vehicle Fuel Tax - - - - - - - - - - Business & Occupation Share - - - - - - - - - - Fund Balance - - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (1)- - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (2)- - - - - - - - - - Mitigation - - - - - - - - - - Bonds / LID's Formed - - - - - - - - - - Other (1)- - - - - - - - - - Other (2)- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Undetermined 13,713,000 - - 13,713,000 - - 278700 621,300 3,963,000 8,850,000 Total Sources 13,713,000 - - 13,713,000 - - 278,700 621,300 3,963,000 8,850,000 - 13,713,000 Project Expenditures & Resources Programmed Programmed Pre-2019 Six-Year Program Renton Connector 317 NEW Vangie Garcia 425-430-7319 The Renton Connector project will install a continuous non-motorized facility along Burnett Ave S. between S. 2nd St and S. 5th St via separated walkways, protected bicycle lanes (cycle track), and a multi-use path. This project will also include reduced travel lanes, landscaped medians, and reconfigured public parking areas in order to provide opportunities to incorporate art, play spaces, and resting areas along the connector. Intersection improvements will include traffic signalization improvements and curb ramp upgrades to ADA standards. As a key element of the Downtown Civic Core Vision and Action Plan, The Renton Connector is a new urban trail, or "greenway", that creates a signature Civic Core and Downtown green spine and regional trail connection between the Cedar River Trail, Lake to Sound Trail, Lake Washington Loop Trail, and the Eastside Rail Corridor for pedestrians and cyclists between the Cedar River, City Hall and the South Renton Transit Center to the South. New Project. Project is pending funding availability. Transportation has applied for grants to begin design and will continue to look into other funding sources. 49 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019 - 2024 TIP No. 23 Project Title:116th Ave SE Improvements Community Planning Area:Benson Fund: Functional Classification:Minor Arterial Project: Project Length:2.5 mi Contact: Project Description: Justification: Status: Changes: Funded:Unfunded: Pre-2018 2018 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Expenditures: Planning - - - - - - - - - - Preliminary Engineering 1,313,179 113,179 - 1,200,000 - - 600,000 600,000 - - R-O-W (includes Admin)2,800,000 - - 2,800,000 - - 1,000,000 1,800,000 - - Construction 5,315,028 615,028 - 4,700,000 - - - 1,000,000 2,000,000 1,700,000 Construction Services 1,547,102 147,102 - 1,400,000 - - - 300,000 600,000 500,000 Post Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenses 10,975,309 875,309 - 10,100,000 - - 1,600,000 3,700,000 2,600,000 2,200,000 Resources: Vehicle Fuel Tax - - - - - - - - - - Business & Occupation Share 221,638 221,638 - - - - - - - - Fund Balance - - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (CMAQ+SRTS)653,671 653,671 - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (2)- - - - - - - - - - Mitigation - - - - - - - - - - Bonds / LID's Formed - - - - - - - - - - Other (1)- - - - - - - - - - Other (2)- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Undetermined 10,100,000 - - 10,100,000 - - 1,600,000 3,700,000 2,600,000 2,200,000 Total Sources 10,975,309 875,309 - 10,100,000 - - 1,600,000 3,700,000 2,600,000 2,200,000 875,309 10,100,000 Project Expenditures & Resources Programmed Programmed Pre-2019 Six-Year Program 116th Ave SE Improvements Transportation applied for a FY 2020 WSDOT Pedestrian-Bicycle grant for the design of a walkway and a bike lane on the west side of 116th Ave SE, between SE 168th St and SE 160th St. 317 122117 Flora Lee 425-430-7303 Widen roadway to provide a 3-lane roadway with bike lanes along 116th Ave SE and Edmonds Way SE, including new pavement, curb, gutter, sidewalk, street lights, traffic signals, storm drainage, channelization and landscaping from Puget Drive SE to the southern City limits. Benson Hill Community Plan recommended improvements for a first phase, based on the neighborhood needs. The priority, cost and schedule for the phased improvements will be determined based on available funding. 116th Ave SE is classified as a minor arterial. Non-continuous segments of sidewalk exist along the roadway. Improvements will enhance vehicular, bicycle and pedestrian safety along this important north-south transportation corridor. The corridor improvements are estimated at $33M. Phase 1 Improvements (SE Petrovitsky Rd to SE 168th St) are shown as programmed for 2020-2024. Staff will be developing scope, cost and schedule for future phases. 50 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019 - 2024 TIP No. 24 Project Title:South 2nd Street Conversion Project Community Planning Area:City Center Fund: Functional Classification:Principal Project: Project Length:0.5 mi Contact: Project Description: Justification: Status: Changes: Funded:Unfunded: Pre-2018 2018 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Expenditures: Planning - - - - - - - - - - Preliminary Engineering 1,450,000 - - 1,450,000 100,000 1,350,000 - - - R-O-W (includes Admin)- - - - - - - - - - Construction 12,000,000 - - 12,000,000 - - - 6,000,000 6,000,000 - Construction Services 3,600,000 - - 3,600,000 - - - 1,800,000 1,800,000 - Post Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenses 17,050,000 - - 17,050,000 - 100,000 1,350,000 7,800,000 7,800,000 - Resources: Vehicle Fuel Tax - - - - - - - - - - Business & Occupation Share 100,000 - - 100,000 - 100,000 - - - - Fund Balance - - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (STP)1,200,000 - - 1,200,000 - - 1,200,000 - - - Grants Awarded (2)- - - - - - - - - - Mitigation - - - - - - - - - - Bonds / LID's Formed - - - - - - - - - - Other (WSDOT Turnback)364,931 - - 364,931 - - 150,000 214,931 - - Other (2)- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Undetermined 15,385,069 - - 15,385,069 - - 7,585,069 7,800,000 - Total Sources 17,050,000 - - 17,050,000 - 100,000 1,350,000 7,800,000 7,800,000 - South 2nd Street Conversion Project 1,664,931 15,385,069 Project Expenditures & Resources Programmed Programmed Pre-2019 Six-Year Program The City was awarded $1.2M STP funds for preliminary engineering in the PSRC Countywide competition. There is $300,000 for this project that is third in line on the Regional project contingency list. 317 Vangie Garcia 425-430-7319 The South 2nd Street Conversion Project will be improving multimodal mobility in around the downtown core by converting an existing 4–lane one-way roadway to a roadway with one through-lane in each direction between Main Ave South and Rainier Ave South. This project also includes pedestrian and bicycle facilities, traffic operations improvements, and transit upgrades that will provide better traffic operation and circulation for all modes of transportation. The improvements include a westbound bypass transit lane from just west of Logan Ave S to just east of Lake Avenue. Transit facility upgrades include new RapidRide stops and a transit queue jump at the new traffic signal at the Shattuck intersection. This project is one of the strategies identified in the City Center Community Plan as well as the Downtown Civic Core Action Plan. The project enhances downtown Renton as a destination area, while improving circulation and enhancing pedestrian safety and environment. The intersection of S 2nd St and Burnett is key connection to The Renton Connector Project (TIP No. 22) Since grant funding for design is for FY 2021, we hope to request advance construction funds to get started on design in order to apply for more grant opportunities. 51 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019 - 2024 TIP No. 25 Project Title:Williams Ave Bridge - Seismic Retrofit and Painting Community Planning Area:City Center Fund: Functional Classification:N/A Project: Project Length:N/A Contact: Project Description: Justification: Status: Changes: Funded:Unfunded: Pre-2018 2018 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Expenditures: Planning - - - - - - - - - - Preliminary Engineering 620,000 - 70,000 550,000 420,000 130,000 - - - - R-O-W (includes Admin)50,000 - - 50,000 50,000 - - - - - Construction 2,175,450 - - 2,175,450 - 2,175,450 - - - - Construction Services 435,000 - - 435,000 - 435,000 - - - - Post Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenses 3,280,450 - 70,000 3,210,450 470,000 2,740,450 - - - - Resources: Vehicle Fuel Tax - - - - - - - - - - Business & Occupation Share 132,000 - 9,450 122,550 - 122,550 - - - - Fund Balance 163,450 - - 163,450 63,450 100,000 - - - - Grants Awarded (FHWA Bridge 2,985,000 - 60,550 2,924,450 406,550 2,517,900 - - - - Grants Awarded (2)- - - - - - - - - - Mitigation - - - - - - - - - - Bonds / LID's Formed - - - - - - - - - - Other (1)- - - - - - - - - - Other (2)- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Undetermined - - - - - - - - - - Total Sources 3,280,450 - 70,000 3,210,450 470,000 2,740,450 - - - - 3,280,450 - Project Expenditures & Resources Programmed Programmed Pre-2019 Six-Year Program Williams Ave Bridge - Seismic Retrofit and Painting 317 NEW Derek Akesson 425-430-7337 The Williams Ave Bridge was built by the City of Renton in 1954. It is a three span bridge that crosses over the Cedar River. The project will remove the existing paint from the steel girders, repair corrosion damage and apply a new protective paint system. The project will also perform a seismic analysis and retrofit along with other improvements. The main span is carried by steel girders. The girders are coated with paint to protect the steel from corrosion. Corrosion causes section loss which results in a reduced load carrying capacity of the girders. The existing paint is failing. The bridge is located in a zone of moderate to high liquefication susceptibility during seismic events. New project. In late 2017, the project was awarded a Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) grant of $2,985,000 to perform a seismic retrofit and painting of the bridge. A 13.5% local match is required for Preliminary Engineering and ROW. If construction is authorized by December 2020, the project is eligible for 100% FHWA funding for eligible costs. 52 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019 - 2024 TIP No. 26 Project Title:Williams Ave S and Wells Ave S Conversion Project Community Planning Area:City Center Fund: Functional Classification:Principal Project: Project Length:N/A Contact: Project Description: Justification: Status: Changes: Funded:Unfunded: Pre-2018 2018 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Expenditures: Planning - - - - - - - - - - Preliminary Engineering 1,147,300 128,030 1,019,270 - - - - - - - R-O-W (includes Admin)130,000 - 130,000 - - - - - - - Construction 7,547,000 - 2,364,931 5,182,069 1,233,800 3,948,269 - - - - Construction Services 2,100,000 - - 2,100,000 500,000 1,600,000 - - - - Post Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Other (BNSF CM Agreement)1,000,000 - - 1,000,000 200,000 800,000 - - - - Total Expenses 11,924,300 128,030 3,514,201 8,282,069 1,933,800 6,348,269 - - - - Resources: Vehicle Fuel Tax - - - - - - - - - - Business & Occupation Share 220,000 - 10,000 210,000 30,000 180,000 - - - - Fund Balance 540,000 128,030 411,970 - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (1)- - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (STP)3,850,000 - - 3,850,000 1,453,800 2,396,200 - - - - Mitigation 1,157,965 - 407,965 750,000 450,000 300,000 - - - - Bonds / LID's Formed - - - - - - - - - - Other (WSDOT Mitigation)319,335 - 319,335 - - - - - - - Other (WSDOT Turnback)2,364,931 - 2,364,931 - - - - - - - Other (Utilties Reimb)- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Undetermined 3,472,069 - - 3,472,069 - 3,472,069 - - - - Total Sources 11,924,300 128,030 3,514,201 8,282,069 1,933,800 6,348,269 - - - - 8,452,231 3,472,069 Project Expenditures & Resources Programmed Programmed Pre-2019 Six-Year Program Williams Ave S and Wells Ave S Conversion Project The City was awarded a STP grant in the amount of $3,850,000 in 2016. Design starting in 2017 and construction is anticipated to start in 2019. 317 122908 Keith Woolley 425-430-7318 The project provides pedestrian and bicyclists facilities and enhancements, traffic operation and circulation improvements in Downtown. The improvements include adding signalized raised intersections with bulb outs, lighting, street furniture, streetscape, bike racks, signage and converting Williams Ave S and Wells Ave S to two-way traffic operations. This project is one of the strategies identified in the City Center Community Plan. The project enhances downtown Renton as a destination area, while improving circulation, reducing traffic speeds and enhancing pedestrian safety. A feasibility study, including a Downtown Circulation Traffic Analysis for the conversion to two-way operations was completed. 53 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019 - 2024 TIP No. 27 Project Title:Carr Road Improvements Community Planning Area:Talbot & Benson Fund: Functional Classification:Major Arterial Project: Project Length:N/A Contact: Project Description: Justification: Status: Changes: Funded:Unfunded: Pre-2018 2018 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Expenditures: Planning 50,000 - - 50,000 50,000 - - - - - Preliminary Engineering 784,421 666,866 117,555 - - - - - - - R-O-W (includes Admin)- - - - - - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Post Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenses 834,421 666,866 117,555 50,000 50,000 - - - - - Resources: Vehicle Fuel Tax - - - - - - - - - - Business & Occupation Share - - - - - - - - - - Fund Balance 78,424 78,424 - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (Fed Safety)660,000 542,445 117,555 - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (2)- - - - - - - - - - Mitigation 95,997 45,997 - 50,000 50,000 - - - - - Bonds / LID's Formed - - - - - - - - - - Other (1)- - - - - - - - - - Other (2)- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Undetermined - - - - - - - - - - Total Sources 834,421 666,866 117,555 50,000 50,000 - - - - - 834,421 - Project Expenditures & Resources Programmed Programmed Pre-2019 Six-Year Program Carr Road Improvements 317 122920 Vangie Garcia 425-430-7319 A corridor study prepared by King County in 2003 identified the need for roadway improvements from Lind Ave SW and SW 43rd St intersection and extend east crossing SR 167 and ending at 116th Ave SE. Potential improvements vary from roadway realignment/widening at several locations to address geometric deficiencies, widening to 5-lane roadway (2 lanes westbound, 3 lanes eastbound), including bicycle lanes on new alignment. The total project cost is estimated as $80M. Carr Road is classified as a principal arterial. It has four lanes of traffic with left-turn lanes at intersections. Improvements are necessary to enhance vehicle traffic capacity and safety for vehicles, bicycles, and pedestrians on this major east-west transportation corridor. Future roadway improvement options include spot safety improvements, bicycle and pedestrian improvements, roadway widening and roadway on new alignment. Staff will be developing scope, cost and schedule for the intersection of Talbot Rd near Valley Medical Center. 54 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019 - 2024 TIP No. 28 Project Title:Houser Way S/N Non-Motorized Improvements Community Planning Area:City Center Fund: Functional Classification:Principal Arterial Project: Project Length:0.36 mi Contact: Project Description: Justification: Status: Changes: Funded:Unfunded: Pre-2018 2018 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Expenditures: Planning - - - - - - - - - - Preliminary Engineering 220,000 - - 220,000 - - - 220,000 - - R-O-W (includes Admin)165,000 - - 165,000 - - - 165,000 - - Construction 750,000 - - 750,000 - - - - 400,000 350,000 Construction Services 900,000 - - 900,000 - - - - 360,000 540,000 Post Construction Services 152,000 - - 152,000 - - - - 76,000 76,000 Other - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenses 2,187,000 - - 2,187,000 - - - 385,000 836,000 966,000 Resources: Vehicle Fuel Tax - - - - - - - - - - Business & Occupation Share - - - - - - - - - - Fund Balance - - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (1)- - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (2)- - - - - - - - - - Mitigation - - - - - - - - - - Bonds / LID's Formed - - - - - - - - - - Other (1)- - - - - - - - - - Other (2)- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Undetermined 2,187,000 - - 2,187,000 - - - 385,000 836,000 966,000 Total Sources 2,187,000 - - 2,187,000 - - - 385,000 836,000 966,000 - 2,187,000 Project Expenditures & Resources Programmed Programmed Pre-2019 Six-Year Program Houser Way S/N Non-Motorized Improvements 317 NEW Vangie Garcia 425-430-7319 This project would install a separated bike facility on the north side of Houser Way S/N, between Mill Ave S. and Bronson Way N. Intersection crossings would be improved at Cedar River Park Drive and Mill Ave S. The project will include planing and pavement overlay, channelization, and intersection crossing improvements. For feasibility and constructibility issues, the roadway and pedestrian bridge sections would not be part of this project. The feedback during the public engagement process for the Trails and Bicycle Master Plan update identified Houser Way as the route for the Eastside Rail Corridor alignment. With the development of the Civic Core Plan, development of this section of the bicycle network creates an important connection point for bicycle traffic between the north and south portions of the City's urban growth center. Creating a bike facility down to Mill Ave S creates a connection to the Cedar River Trail. The crossing at Cedar River Park Drive is a connection point for people connecting from Liberty Park to the Renton Community Center. New Project. 55 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019 - 2024 TIP No. 29 Project Title:Houser Way North - North 8th Street to Lake Washington Blvd Community Planning Area:City Center Fund: Functional Classification:N/A Project: Project Length:N/A Contact: Project Description: Justification: Status: Changes: Funded:Unfunded: Pre-2018 2018 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Expenditures: Planning - - - - - - - - - - Preliminary Engineering 900,000 - - 900,000 - - - 900,000 - - R-O-W (includes Admin)165,000 - - 165,000 - - - 165,000 - - Construction 3,000,000 - - 3,000,000 - - - - 1,200,000 1,800,000 Construction Services 900,000 - - 900,000 - - - - 360,000 540,000 Post Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenses 4,965,000 - - 4,965,000 - - - 1,065,000 1,560,000 2,340,000 Resources: Vehicle Fuel Tax - - - - - - - - - - Business & Occupation Share - - - - - - - - - - Fund Balance - - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (1)- - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (2)- - - - - - - - - - Mitigation - - - - - - - - - - Bonds / LID's Formed - - - - - - - - - - Other (1)- - - - - - - - - - Other (2)- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Undetermined 4,965,000 - - 4,965,000 - - - 1,065,000 1,560,000 2,340,000 Total Sources 4,965,000 - - 4,965,000 - - - 1,065,000 1,560,000 2,340,000 317 Houser Way North - North 8th Street to Lake Washington Blvd Bob Mahn 425-430-7322 This project will widen and realign the existing one lane roadway to a two-lane roadway and includes intersection improvements to convert Houser Way N to a two-way operation. Includes new roadway, curbs, pedestrian-bicycle path, drainage, signals, lighting, signing and channelization. The City of Renton travel demand model predicts traffic volumes increasing significantly in the North Renton Area in the near future. One of the recommendations to improve northbound access to Lake Washington Blvd is to convert Houser Way N to a two-way operations, between N 8th St and Lake Washington Blvd. A conceptual layout of the two-way approach to the intersection of Houser Way and Lake WA Blvd has been completed. This project will coordinate with the Southport Development improvements to the Southport entrance at the Lake WA Blvd/Coulon Park intersection. - 4,965,000 Project Expenditures & Resources Programmed Programmed Pre-2019 Six-Year Program 56 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019 - 2024 TIP No. 30 Project Title:Lake to Sound (L2S) Trail Community Planning Area:Valley & City Center Fund: Functional Classification:Minor and Principal Arterial, and Other Project: Project Length:1.6 mi Contact: Project Description: Justification: Status: Changes: Funded:Unfunded: Pre-2018 2018 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Expenditures: Planning - - - - - - - - - - Preliminary Engineering 800,000 800,000 - - - - - - - - R-O-W (includes Admin)110,000 110,000 - - - - - - - - Construction 2,240,000 - - 2,240,000 2,240,000 - - - - - Construction Services 560,000 - - 560,000 560,000 - - - - - Post Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenses 3,710,000 910,000 - 2,800,000 2,800,000 - - - - - Resources: Vehicle Fuel Tax - - - - - - - - - - Business & Occupation Share - - - - - - - - - - Fund Balance - - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (1)- - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (2)- - - - - - - - - - Mitigation - - - - - - - - - - Bonds / LID's Formed - - - - - - - - - - Other (KC+CMAQ Grant)3,710,000 910,000 - 2,800,000 2,800,000 - - - - - Other (2)- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Undetermined - - - - - - - - - - Total Sources 3,710,000 910,000 - 2,800,000 2,800,000 - - - - - 3,710,000 - Project Expenditures & Resources Programmed Programmed Pre-2019 Six-Year Program Lake to Sound (L2S) Trail If L2S uses BNSF ROW for central section, the alignment would likely be on the south side, lower bank. Downtown Civic Core team prefers alignment with city-owned Houser Way section along the south side of ROW. Alignment within BNSF would require King County to purchase ROW and new bridges to cross roadways. An alignment on 7th Street can be developed as a reasonable alternative or parallel route as a trail within railroad ROW is developed (TIP #42). 317 122903 Vangie Garcia 425-430-7319 The Lake to Sound (L2S) Trail is a joint partnership between the cities of Renton, SeaTac, Tukwila, Burien and Des Moines, in coordination with King County. The 17-mile L2S Trail will provide an east-west connection between the shoreline of Lake Washington (Renton) and the shoreline of Puget Sound (Des Moines). Phase A goes from Naches Ave SW (Renton) to Fort Dent Park (Tukwila). The length between Naches Ave SW and Mill Ave S are future phases. Phase A will connect Fort Dent (Tukwila) to the larger system of regional trails in South King County, including the Green River Trail, the Interurban Trail and the Cedar River Trail. Phase A will provide a 12-foot wide asphalt paved multi-use trail, with 2-foot gravel shoulders. In the Downtown Civic Core Plan, the L2S Trail connects to the Eastside Rail Corridor (ERC) and the Renton Connector (TIP #22). This project received a $950,000 CMAQ grant for construction of Phase A (Naches Ave SW to Fort Dent Park inTukwila), in 2014. No City match is required. King County is leading the design for construction of Phase A, Fort Dent Park Connection. Construction of Phase A is anticipated to be completed in 2019. City staff will be developing scope, cost and schedule for future phases. 57 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019 - 2024 TIP No. 31 Project Title:Lake Washington Blvd N - Park Ave N to Gene Coulon Memorial Park Community Planning Area:City Center Fund: Functional Classification:Collector Project: Project Length:N/A Contact: Project Description: Justification: Status: Changes: Funded:Unfunded: Pre-2018 2018 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Expenditures: Planning 14,899 14,899 - - - - - - - - Preliminary Engineering 28,460 28,460 - - - - - - - - R-O-W (includes Admin)- - - - - - - - - - Construction 1,973,821 373,821 - 1,600,000 1,600,000 - - - - - Construction Services 410,363 10,363 - 400,000 400,000 - - - - - Post Construction Services 15,934 15,934 - - - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenses 2,443,477 443,477 - 2,000,000 2,000,000 - - - - - Resources: Vehicle Fuel Tax 2,807 2,807 - - - - - - - - Business & Occupation Share 2,734 2,734 - - - - - - - - Fund Balance 8,828 8,828 - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (1)149,501 149,501 - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (2)- - - - - - - - - - Mitigation 258,353 258,353 - - - - - - - - Bonds / LID's Formed - - - - - - - - - - Other (Dev. Expend)2,000,000 - - 2,000,000 2,000,000 - - - - - Other (Dev. Reimb)21,253 21,253 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Undetermined - - - - - - - - - - Total Sources 2,443,476 443,476 - 2,000,000 2,000,000 - - - - - 2,443,476 - Project Expenditures & Resources Programmed Programmed Pre-2019 Six-Year Program Lake Washington Blvd N - Park Ave N to Gene Coulon Memorial Park Last Phase underway. Design for Lake Washington Blvd is complete. Construction to start in the summer of 2018 and be completed by the end of 2019. 317 122121 Bob Hanson 425-430-7319 This project includes road widening, traffic signals, railroad crossings, drainage, curb, gutter, sidewalks and bicycle lanes. Developer to design and construct improvements, and get credit toward mitigation contribution. The developer is completing the project in 3 phases. This project will serve the development and access needs to Coulon Park and the Southport Development. Agreement with developer to credit traffic mitigation towards the costs of certain improvements. The hotel tower was complete in 2018. The office towers are under construction. This project will be funded by the development of Southport. The costs shown below are for the estimated mitigation credit, per agreement with the developer. 58 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019 - 2024 TIP No. 32 Project Title:Lind Ave SW - SW 16th St to SW 43rd St Community Planning Area:Valley Fund: Functional Classification:Minor Arterial Project: Project Length:1.69 mi Contact: Project Description: Justification: Status: Changes: Funded:Unfunded: Pre-2018 2018 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Expenditures: Planning - - - - - - - - - - Preliminary Engineering 650,000 - - 650,000 - - - 400,000 250,000 - R-O-W (includes Admin)- - - - - - - - - - Construction 3,200,000 - - 3,200,000 - - - - 1,200,000 2,000,000 Construction Services 550,000 - - 550,000 - - - - 200,000 350,000 Post Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenses 4,400,000 - - 4,400,000 - - - 400,000 1,650,000 2,350,000 Resources: Vehicle Fuel Tax - - - - - - - - - - Business & Occupation Share - - - - - - - - - - Fund Balance - - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (1)- - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (2)- - - - - - - - - - Mitigation - - - - - - - - - - Bonds / LID's Formed - - - - - - - - - - Other (1)- - - - - - - - - - Other (2)- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Undetermined 4,400,000 - - 4,400,000 - - - 400,000 1,650,000 2,350,000 Total Sources 4,400,000 - - 4,400,000 - - - 400,000 1,650,000 2,350,000 - 4,400,000 Project Expenditures & Resources Programmed Programmed Pre-2019 Six-Year Program Lind Ave SW - SW 16th St to SW 43rd St 317 120024 Bob Mahn 425-430-7322 Widen existing roadway to five lanes where required. Includes new roadway, curbs, sidewalks, drainage, signals, lighting, signing and channelization. Increasing traffic demands in the Valley due in part to development will create the need to increase the capacity of this major north/south arterial. A potential project is a signal installation at the intersection at Lind Ave SW and SW 34th St (currently unsignalized). Additionally, improvements may result from future WSDOT I-405 plans which include an interchange at Lind Ave SW (currently unfunded). The needs, priorities and schedules for improvements on Lind Ave SW will be determined through Arterial Circulation studies. 59 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019 - 2024 TIP No. 33 Project Title:Logan Ave North Improvements Community Planning Area:City Center Fund: Functional Classification:Principal Arterial Project: Project Length:0.76 mi Contact: Project Description: Justification: Status: Changes: Funded:Unfunded: Pre-2018 2018 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Expenditures: Planning 39,760 39,760 - - - - - - - - Preliminary Engineering 3,245,616 1,005,616 - 2,240,000 - - - - 1,240,000 1,000,000 R-O-W (includes Admin)9,033,266 33,266 - 9,000,000 - - - - - 9,000,000 Construction 5,108,330 4,908,330 200,000 - - - - - - - Construction Services 1,167,070 1,081,070 86,000 - - - - - - - Post Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenses 18,594,042 7,068,042 286,000 11,240,000 - - - - 1,240,000 10,000,000 Resources: Vehicle Fuel Tax - - - - - - - - - - Business & Occupation Share 27,065 27,065 - - - - - - - - Fund Balance 59,090 20,111 38,979 - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (STP)3,074,943 2,988,943 86,000 - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (TIB)3,912,242 3,751,221 161,021 - - - - - - - Mitigation 200,000 200,000 - - - - - - - - Bonds / LID's Formed - - - - - - - - - - Other (Integra Phone)53,702 53,702 - - - - - - - - Other (Boeing Lot)27,000 27,000 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Undetermined 11,240,000 - - 11,240,000 - - - - 1,240,000 10,000,000 Total Sources 18,594,042 7,068,042 286,000 11,240,000 - - - - 1,240,000 10,000,000 Logan Ave North Improvements 7,354,042 11,240,000 Project Expenditures & Resources Programmed Programmed Pre-2019 Six-Year Program Project has been closed out for Phase 1. 317 122303 Vangie Garcia 425-430-7319 Phase 1 (Cedar River Bridge to N 6th St) is complete. Phase 2 (N 6th St to Park Ave N) will add a NB lane, new curb, gutter, sidewalks (on the east side), landscaped buffer, and a pedestrian/bicycle trail (west side), streetlights, pedestrian scale illumination, crosswalks, channelization. The increase in traffic and the new RapidRide transit have warranted widening to add a northbound lane. Included with the improvements are urban roadway amenities to implement "Complete Streets" practice per City code. Project is on hold until the Boeing Company is in a position to dedicate property to the project. 60 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019 - 2024 TIP No. 34 Project Title:Maple Valley Highway Barriers Community Planning Area:Cedar River Fund: Functional Classification:Principal Arterial Project: Project Length:N/A Contact: Project Description: Justification: Status: Changes: Funded:Unfunded: Pre-2018 2018 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Expenditures: Planning - - - - - - - - - - Preliminary Engineering 522,970 - - 522,970 - - 274,035 248,935 - - R-O-W (includes Admin)156,300 - - 156,300 - - 25,000 131,300 - - Construction 1,804,160 - - 1,804,160 - - - 1,804,160 - - Construction Services 654,470 - - 654,470 - - - 654,470 - - Post Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenses 3,137,900 - - 3,137,900 - - 299,035 2,838,865 - - Resources: Vehicle Fuel Tax - - - - - - - - - - Business & Occupation Share - - - - - - - - - - Fund Balance - - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (1)- - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (2)- - - - - - - - - - Mitigation - - - - - - - - - - Bonds / LID's Formed - - - - - - - - - - Other (1)- - - - - - - - - - Other (2)- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Undetermined 3,137,900 - - 3,137,900 - - 299,035 2,838,865 - - Total Sources 3,137,900 - - 3,137,900 - - 299,035 2,838,865 - - - 3,137,900 Project Expenditures & Resources Programmed Programmed Pre-2019 Six-Year Program Maple Valley Highway Barriers 317 Chris Barnes 425-430-7220 This project includes two barriers: One is to install a concrete median barrier between east and westbound travel lanes of the SR 169 S-Curve between the Riviera Apartments and S. 5th Street including associated roadway widening to add the barrier. The second barrier improvement will remove the existing concrete barrier end treatment located eastbound (east of the Riviera Apartments) and replace with 2 new concrete barriers extending west. Maple Valley Highway (SR 169) is a principal arterial carrying 44,000 vehicles per day. This project will improve safety for traffic on Maple Valley Highway (SR 169) at this location, which has been the site to numerous collision impacts. The design report for the Cedar River half bridge is complete and was funded by the Roadway Safety and Guardrail Program (TIP # 4). Final design and construction pending funding availability. 61 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019 - 2024 TIP No. 35 Project Title:Monster Road SW/68th Ave S Roadway Improvements Community Planning Area:Valley Fund: Functional Classification:N/A Project: Project Length:0.92 mi Contact: Project Description: Justification: Status: Changes: Funded:Unfunded: Pre-2018 2018 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Expenditures: Planning 50,000 - - 50,000 - - - - 50,000 - Preliminary Engineering 5,000,000 - - 5,000,000 - - - - - 5,000,000 R-O-W (includes Admin)3,000,000 - - 3,000,000 - - - - - 3,000,000 Construction - - - - - - - - - - Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Post Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenses 8,050,000 - - 8,050,000 - - - - 50,000 8,000,000 Resources: Vehicle Fuel Tax - - - - - - - - - - Business & Occupation Share - - - - - - - - - - Fund Balance - - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (1)- - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (2)- - - - - - - - - - Mitigation - - - - - - - - - - Bonds / LID's Formed - - - - - - - - - - Other (1)- - - - - - - - - - Other (2)- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Undetermined 8,050,000 - - 8,050,000 - - - - 50,000 8,000,000 Total Sources 8,050,000 - - 8,050,000 - - - - 50,000 8,000,000 - 8,050,000 Project Expenditures & Resources Programmed Programmed Pre-2019 Six-Year Program Monster Road SW/68th Ave S Roadway Improvements 317 Vangie Garcia 425-430-7319 Widen existing roadway to four lanes plus two-way-left-turn-lane where needed and bike lanes. Realign Beacon Coal Mine Road approach to intersection with the Monster Road SW roadway. Includes new roadway, curbs, sidewalk, drainage, street lighting, traffic signals, channelization, retaining walls and widening the existing bridge. Will serve growing north-south traffic demand. A preliminary design study was completed in 1999. The project cost is estimated at $32M, with the City's share estimated at $13M and King Co. at $19M. Phase 1 of improvements will address drainage problems between the Monster Rd Bridge and the City limits. Scope, cost and implementation schedule to be determined. Project is pending future grant funding availability. Cost beyond 2024 not shown. 62 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019 - 2024 TIP No. 36 Project Title:NE 3rd Street/NE 4th Street Corridor Improvements Community Planning Area:Highlands & East Plateau Fund: Functional Classification:Principal Project: Project Length:2.2 mi Contact: Project Description: Justification: Status: Changes: Funded:Unfunded: Pre-2018 2018 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Expenditures: Planning 258,420 218,420 - 40,000 20,000 20,000 - - - - Preliminary Engineering 2,276,917 776,917 - 1,500,000 - - 750,000 750,000 - - R-O-W (includes Admin)684,024 84,024 - 600,000 - - - 600,000 - - Construction 10,816,803 2,316,803 - 8,500,000 - - - 2,500,000 4,500,000 1,500,000 Construction Services 3,042,921 322,921 - 2,720,000 - - - 340,000 680,000 1,700,000 Post Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenses 17,079,085 3,719,085 - 13,360,000 20,000 20,000 750,000 4,190,000 5,180,000 3,200,000 Resources: Vehicle Fuel Tax - - - - - - - - - - Business & Occupation Share 462,831 422,831 - 40,000 20,000 20,000 - - - - Fund Balance 1,024,433 1,024,433 - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (TIB)1,495,542 1,495,542 - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (2)- - - - - - - - - - Mitigation 373,700 373,700 - - - - - - - - Bonds / LID's Formed - - - - - - - - - - Other (KC WD#90)352,541 352,541 - - - - - - - - Other (Franchise Reimb)50,038 50,038 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Undetermined 13,320,000 - - 13,320,000 - 750,000 4,190,000 5,180,000 3,200,000 Total Sources 17,079,085 3,719,085 - 13,360,000 20,000 20,000 750,000 4,190,000 5,180,000 3,200,000 3,759,085 13,320,000 Project Expenditures & Resources Programmed Programmed Pre-2019 Six-Year Program NE 3rd Street/NE 4th Street Corridor Improvements The estimated cost for all corridor improvements (Sunset Blvd N to the east City limits) is $46M. Programmed expenses (2021-2024) are placeholders for future phases. Programmed expenses in 2019-2020 are for developing scope, cost and schedule for next phases. Future phases are pending future grant funding availability. Increased estimated costs from previous TIP for inflation. 317 122176 Keith Woolley 425-430-7318 This project involves a series of improvements in this corridor to improve traffic operations such as rechannelization and traffic signal modifications, possible transit priority signal treatments and queue jumps. This project will seek to meet pedestrian, transit and bicycle needs. Phase 1 constructed a new signal and other improvements at NE 4th St and Whitman Ave NE. This corridor has a strong potential for transit usage and is experiencing rapid residential and retail growth. The NE 3rd/4th Corridor Study was adopted in May 2005. The study refined the corridor transportation needs and costs, including pedestrian, transit, bicycle improvements, as well as streetscape enhancement. 63 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019 - 2024 TIP No. 37 Project Title:Nile Ave NE Bridge Replacement Community Planning Area:East Plateau Fund: Functional Classification:N/A Project: Project Length:N/A Contact: Project Description: Justification: Status: Changes: Funded:Unfunded: Pre-2018 2018 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Expenditures: Planning - - - - - - - - - - Preliminary Engineering 250,000 - - 250,000 - 50,000 200,000 - - - R-O-W (includes Admin)- - - - - - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Post Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenses 250,000 - - 250,000 - 50,000 200,000 - - - Resources: Vehicle Fuel Tax - - - - - - - - - - Business & Occupation Share 50,000 - - 50,000 - 50,000 - - - - Fund Balance - - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (1)- - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (2)- - - - - - - - - - Mitigation - - - - - - - - - - Bonds / LID's Formed - - - - - - - - - - Other (1)- - - - - - - - - - Other (2)- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Undetermined 200,000 - - 200,000 - - 200,000 - - - Total Sources 250,000 - - 250,000 - 50,000 200,000 - - - 50,000 200,000 Project Expenditures & Resources Programmed Programmed Pre-2019 Six-Year Program Nile Ave NE Bridge Replacement 317 NEW Derek Akesson 425-430-7337 The Nile Ave NE Bridge was built by King County in 1951. Ownership was transferred to the City in 2009 as part of the MacKay Annexation (Ord #5456). It is a single span bridge that crosses over May Creek. The initial phase of this project will evaluate replacement options with a type, size and location (TS&L) study. The bridge is 17 years beyond its original design life of 50 years. It will very likely need to be replaced or significantly retrofitted within the next 10 years. The main span is comprised of precast concrete girders. The girders are supported on treated timber piles with a timber caps. Some of the timber piles are showing signs of deterioration. New project. To date the project has not received grant funding for replacement. However, with a TS&L study, the City will be in a very good position to apply for Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) funding when the bridge condition qualifies for replacement funding. 64 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019 - 2024 TIP No. 38 Project Title:Rainier Ave N Corridor Improvements (Phase 5) Community Planning Area:City Center Fund: Functional Classification:N/A Project: Project Length:0.76 mi Contact: Project Description: Justification: Status: Changes: Funded:Unfunded: Pre-2018 2018 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Expenditures: Planning 100,000 - - 100,000 - - - - 100,000 - Preliminary Engineering 2,000,000 - - 2,000,000 - - - - - 2,000,000 R-O-W (includes Admin)- - - - - - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Post Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenses 2,100,000 - - 2,100,000 - - - - 100,000 2,000,000 Resources: Vehicle Fuel Tax - - - - - - - - - - Business & Occupation Share - - - - - - - - - - Fund Balance - - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (1)- - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (2)- - - - - - - - - - Mitigation - - - - - - - - - - Bonds / LID's Formed - - - - - - - - - - Other (1)- - - - - - - - - - Other (2)- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Undetermined 2,100,000 - - 2,100,000 - - - - 100,000 2,000,000 Total Sources 2,100,000 - - 2,100,000 - - - - 100,000 2,000,000 - 2,100,000 Project Expenditures & Resources Programmed Programmed Pre-2019 Six-Year Program Rainier Ave N Corridor Improvements (Phase 5) 317 Vangie Garcia 425-430-7319 This is Phase 5 of the Rainier Ave Corridor Improvements, and will extend the improvements from NW 3rd Pl to north City limits. Project elements include widening of sidewalks with streetscaping, adding pedestrian-scale illumination and planted buffer strips. The street may be narrowed from 5 to 3 lanes where feasible. On the east side of Rainier Ave the new multi-use trail will be installed (Lake Washington Loop Trail), (as shown on TIP #18). Rainier Ave is a critical corridor in Renton with existing operational problems and in need of infrastructure enhancements to provide greater ease for non-motorized and transit- based travel. Funds shown in 2023 are for planning to determine the roadway cross section. Project cost estimated at $31.5M and is unfunded. Costs beyond 2024 not shown. 65 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019 - 2024 TIP No. 39 Project Title:Renton Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Improvements Community Planning Area:City Center Fund: Functional Classification:TBD Project: Project Length:TBD Contact: Project Description: Justification: Status: Changes: Funded:Unfunded: Pre-2018 2018 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Expenditures: Planning - - - - - - - - - - Preliminary Engineering - - - - - - - - - - R-O-W (includes Admin)- - - - - - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Post Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Other 21,300,000 - - 21,300,000 - - - 3,195,000 9,052,500 9,052,500 Total Expenses 21,300,000 - - 21,300,000 - - - 3,195,000 9,052,500 9,052,500 Resources: Vehicle Fuel Tax - - - - - - - - - - Business & Occupation Share - - - - - - - - - - Fund Balance - - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (1)- - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded(2)- - - - - - - - - - Mitigation - - - - - - - - - - Bonds / LID's Formed - - - - - - - - - - Other (1)- - - - - - - - - - Other (2)- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Undetermined 21,300,000 - - 21,300,000 - - - 3,195,000 9,052,500 9,052,500 Total Sources 21,300,000 - - 21,300,000 - - - 3,195,000 9,052,500 9,052,500 Renton Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Improvements - 21,300,000 Project Expenditures & Resources Programmed Programmed Pre-2019 Six-Year Program 317 NEW Vangie Garcia 425-430-7319 New transit access road improvements from I-405 exit 3 (Talbot Rd) to South Renton Transit Center. Includes reconfiguration of Grady Way, Lake Ave S and S Renton Village Place to accommodate transit. With current traffic conditions and configurations, improvements will be needed to ensure speed and reliability of the BRT system into and out of the South Renton Transit Center. This transit hub is currently and will remain a key connection point for transit users for both Metro and Sound Transit. Proximity to the Sounder Station and future increase of parking availability also plays a key role in improvement accessibility needs. New Project. Estimated cost in Regional Transportation Plan is $21,300,000. Design and Construction should be implemented and coordinated with South Renton Transit Center, development of Renton Village, and implementation of I-405 Bus Rapid Transit. 66 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019 - 2024 TIP No. 40 Project Title:Transit Master Plan Community Planning Area:Citywide Fund: Functional Classification:N/A Project: Project Length:N/A Contact: Project Description: Justification: Status: Changes: Funded:Unfunded: Pre-2018 2018 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Expenditures: Planning 500,000 - - 500,000 - - 300,000 200,000 - - Preliminary Engineering - - - - - - - - - - R-O-W (includes Admin)- - - - - - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Post Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenses 500,000 - - 500,000 - - 300,000 200,000 - - Resources: Vehicle Fuel Tax - - - - - - - - - - Business & Occupation Share - - - - - - - - - - Fund Balance - - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (1)- - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (2)- - - - - - - - - - Mitigation - - - - - - - - - - Bonds / LID's Formed - - - - - - - - - - Other (1)- - - - - - - - - - Other (2)- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Undetermined 500,000 - - 500,000 - - 300,000 200,000 - - Total Sources 500,000 - - 500,000 - - 300,000 200,000 - - - 500,000 Project Expenditures & Resources Programmed Programmed Pre-2019 Six-Year Program Transit Master Plan 317 NEW Vangie Garcia 425-430-7319 The Transit Master Plan provides the city with a means to influence decisions made by regional transit authorities. It also provides a basis on which to begin advancing proposed capital projects for further study, design and prioritization, and position them to be strong competitors for grant funding. The plan establishes scalable short- and long-term strategies, and identifies projects that will foster a high-quality transit system to meet Renton’s needs. Although the City does not operate its own transit service, the role of transit in Renton is evolving and becoming more of a priority in the region. The current regional vision allows cities and other urban service providers prioritized maximizing the use of existing infrastructure, making more efficient and less costly investments in new infrastructure, and minimizing the environmental impact of urban growth. This prioritization made transportation a key role in the region by creating improved accessibility and mobility for walking, biking, and transit. Regional growth centers are envisioned as major focal points of higher density population and employment, served with efficient multimodal transportation infrastructure and services. Linking these centers with a highly efficient transportation system allows the region to take actions to reduce the rate of growth in vehicle miles traveled, especially by providing and expanding transportation choices. New project. 67 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019 - 2024 TIP No. 41 Project Title:South 3rd Street Conversion Project Community Planning Area:City Center Fund: Functional Classification:Principal Project: Project Length:N/A Contact: Project Description: Justification: Status: Changes: Funded:Unfunded: Pre-2018 2018 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Expenditures: Planning - - - - - - - - - - Preliminary Engineering 4,000,000 - - 4,000,000 - - 4,000,000 - - - R-O-W (includes Admin)- - - - - - - - - - Construction 13,200,000 - - 13,200,000 - - - 5,000,000 8,200,000 - Construction Services 4,000,000 - - 4,000,000 - - - 1,500,000 2,500,000 - Post Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenses 21,200,000 - - 21,200,000 - - 4,000,000 6,500,000 10,700,000 - Resources: Vehicle Fuel Tax - - - - - - - - - - Business & Occupation Share - - - - - - - - - - Fund Balance - - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (1)- - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded(2)- - - - - - - - - - Mitigation - - - - - - - - - - Bonds / LID's Formed - - - - - - - - - - Other (1)- - - - - - - - - - Other (2)- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Undetermined 21,200,000 - - 21,200,000 - - 4,000,000 6,500,000 10,700,000 - Total Sources 21,200,000 - - 21,200,000 - - 4,000,000 6,500,000 10,700,000 - South 3rd Street Conversion Project - 21,200,000 Project Expenditures & Resources Programmed Programmed Pre-2019 Six-Year Program 317 Vangie Garcia 425-430-7319 The project provides pedestrian and bicyclists facilities and enhancements, traffic operation and circulation improvements in Downtown. The improvements include adding raised intersections with bulb outs, parklets, pedestrian plaza, lighting, street furniture, streetscape, bicycle blvd, bike racks, signage, wayfinding and converting S 3rd St to two-way operations. This project is one of the strategies identified in the City Center Community Plan. The project enhances downtown Renton as a destination area, while improving circulation, reducing traffic speeds and enhancing pedestrian safety. A feasibility study, including a Downtown Circulation Traffic Analysis for the conversion to two-way operations was completed. This is the last project of the Downtown Conversion to a two-way operations. It will continue the downtown improvements, further enhancing the pedestrian and bicyclists environment. Project is pending future grant funding availability. 68 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019 - 2024 TIP No. 42 Project Title:S/SW 7th Street Corridor Improvements - Naches Ave S to Talbot Road S Community Planning Area:City Center Fund: Functional Classification:Minor Arterial Project: Project Length:1.16 mi Contact: Project Description: Justification: Status: Changes: Funded:Unfunded: Pre-2018 2018 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Expenditures: Planning 32,270 32,270 - - - - - - - - Preliminary Engineering 2,311,842 311,842 - 2,000,000 - - 200,000 800,000 1,000,000 - R-O-W (includes Admin)1,725,124 25,124 - 1,700,000 - - - 800,000 900,000 Construction 11,362,668 975,141 14,599 10,372,928 - - - - 7,264,000 3,108,928 Construction Services 1,999,882 299,882 - 1,700,000 - - - - 1,200,000 500,000 Post Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenses 17,431,786 1,644,259 14,599 15,772,928 - - 200,000 1,600,000 10,364,000 3,608,928 Resources: Vehicle Fuel Tax - - - - - - - - - - Business & Occupation Share 52,115 52,115 - - - - - - - - Fund Balance + Reserve 72,164 60,401 11,763 - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (STP)497,241 494,405 2,836 - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (TIB)613,338 613,338 - - - - - - - - Mitigation 424,000 424,000 - - - - - - - - Bonds / LID's Formed - - - - - - - - - - Other (1)- - - - - - - - - - Other (2)- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Undetermined 15,772,928 - - 15,772,928 - - 200,000 1,600,000 10,364,000 3,608,928 Total Sources 17,431,786 1,644,259 14,599 15,772,928 - - 200,000 1,600,000 10,364,000 3,608,928 1,658,858 15,772,928 Project Expenditures & Resources Programmed Programmed Pre-2019 Six-Year Program S/SW 7th Street Corridor Improvements - Naches Ave S to Talbot Road S Added costs for the SW 7th St Sidepath. It is assumed that no ROW would be required. 317 122151 Vangie Garcia 425-430-7319 Widening the existing S 7th St from Talbot Road S to Rainier Ave S roadway to 3 lanes (2 lanes EB and 1 lane WB) and a separated multi-use trail. Includes new curb, gutter, wider sidewalks, street lighting, landscaping, channelization and upgrades to traffic signals. The S 7th St Project - Traffic Analysis Report provided alternatives for corridor improvement options. This project also includes a sidepath on SW 7th St between Rainier Ave S and Naches Ave S. The segment of the S 7th St corridor connects Talbot Rd S (SR 515) with Rainier Ave S (SR 167). The segment of S 7th St is part of a designated east-west ped/bike route through the City's commercial core and an important link between regional trails. The South Renton Neighborhood Study has identified South 7th St as needing streetscape improvements. The Trails and Bicycle Master Plan Update identified SW 7th St/S 7th St as a good alternate/parallel route as the L2S Trail (TIP #30) is developed. With the expansion of the South Renton Transit Center and Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) implementation, S 7th St is important non-motorized link to downtown core. Costs incurred are for Phase 1, which added a traffic signal and an eastbound right-turn lane at the intersection of S 7th St and Shattuck Ave S. Project is pending future grant funding availability. 69 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019 - 2024 TIP No. 43 Project Title:South Grady Way - Talbot Rd South to Rainier Ave South Community Planning Area:City Center Fund: Functional Classification:N/A Project: Project Length:N/A Contact: Project Description: Justification: Status: Changes: Funded:Unfunded: Pre-2018 2018 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Expenditures: Planning - - - - - - - - - - Preliminary Engineering 750,000 - - 750,000 - - 550,000 200,000 - - R-O-W (includes Admin)- - - - - - - - - - Construction 2,500,000 - - 2,500,000 - - - 1,200,000 1,300,000 - Construction Services 750,000 - - 750,000 - - - 360,000 390,000 - Post Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenses 4,000,000 - - 4,000,000 - - 550,000 1,760,000 1,690,000 - Resources: Vehicle Fuel Tax - - - - - - - - - - Business & Occupation Share - - - - - - - - - - Fund Balance - - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (1)- - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (2)- - - - - - - - - - Mitigation - - - - - - - - - - Bonds / LID's Formed - - - - - - - - - - Other (1)- - - - - - - - - - Other (2)- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Undetermined 4,000,000 - - 4,000,000 - - 550,000 1,760,000 1,690,000 - Total Sources 4,000,000 - - 4,000,000 - - 550,000 1,760,000 1,690,000 - - 4,000,000 Project Expenditures & Resources Programmed Programmed Pre-2019 Six-Year Program South Grady Way - Talbot Rd South to Rainier Ave South 317 Vangie Garcia 425-430-7319 This project will perform a comprehensive analysis of multi-modal transportation improvements, including review of potential transit improvements along Grady Way, such as Business Access and Transit (BAT) lanes and Traffic Signal Priority (TSP). The project will remove the islands at the intersections of S Grady Way with Lake Ave S and Shattuck Ave S, to allow for a continuous eastbound lane from Rainier Ave S to Talbot Rd S. Included are modifications to the traffic signal, new pedestrian crossings and channelization. The improvements will add much needed capacity to the S Grady Way corridor. Project is pending future grant funding availability. 70 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019 - 2024 TIP No. 44 Project Title:South Lake Washington Transit Stop Community Planning Area:City Center Fund: Functional Classification:N/A Project: Project Length:N/A Contact: Project Description: Justification: Status: Changes: Funded:Unfunded: Pre-2018 2018 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Expenditures: Planning - - - - - - - - - - Preliminary Engineering 600,000 - - 600,000 - - 600,000 - - - R-O-W (includes Admin)- - - - - - - - - - Construction 3,000,000 - - 3,000,000 - - 3,000,000 - - - Construction Services 750,000 - - 750,000 - - 750,000 - - - Post Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenses 4,350,000 - - 4,350,000 - - 4,350,000 - - - Resources: Vehicle Fuel Tax - - - - - - - - - - Business & Occupation Share - - - - - - - - - - Fund Balance - - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (1)- - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (2)- - - - - - - - - - Mitigation - - - - - - - - - - Bonds / LID's Formed - - - - - - - - - - Other (1)- - - - - - - - - - Other (2)- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Undetermined 4,350,000 - - 4,350,000 - - 4,350,000 - - - Total Sources 4,350,000 - - 4,350,000 - - 4,350,000 - - - - 4,350,000 Project Expenditures & Resources Programmed Programmed Pre-2019 Six-Year Program South Lake Washington Transit Stop 317 Vangie Garcia 425-430-7319 This project will implement a Bus Transit Station at Park Ave. N and Garden Ave N. The project includes a new transit stop, with passenger amenities such as shelters, lighting, benches, litter receptacles, bicycle racks and lockers. The project is proposed to meet recent travel demand growth in the area and as a part of the connectivity of the regional transit system. This transit hub will provide service to a 17.5 acre mixed use site consisting of 730,000 sq.ft. of office space, 43,000 sq.ft. of meeting space, 30,000 sq.ft. of retail, 383 apartment units and a 347 unit hotel. Other new development in the area includes two hotels. In addition, a large manufacturing company's employees will benefit from the transit hub's location as well as visitors to The Landing and the 57 acre Gene Coulon Park. The preliminary planning for this transit project will be incorporated into the N Park Ave Extension Project (TIP #20). 71 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019 - 2024 TIP No. 45 Project Title:Sunset Area Green Connections Community Planning Area:Highlands Fund: Functional Classification:N/A Project: Project Length:N/A Contact: Project Description: Justification: Status: Changes: Funded:Unfunded: Pre-2018 2018 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Expenditures: Planning - - - - - - - - - - Preliminary Engineering 2,600,000 - - 2,600,000 - - - 2,600,000 - - R-O-W (includes Admin)1,000,000 - - 1,000,000 - - - 1,000,000 - - Construction 16,000,000 - - 16,000,000 - - - - 9,200,000 6,800,000 Construction Services 2,600,000 - - 2,600,000 - - - - 1,500,000 1,100,000 Post Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenses 22,200,000 - - 22,200,000 - - - 3,600,000 10,700,000 7,900,000 Resources: Vehicle Fuel Tax - - - - - - - - - - Business & Occupation Share - - - - - - - - - - Fund Balance - - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (1)- - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (2)- - - - - - - - - - Mitigation - - - - - - - - - - Bonds / LID's Formed - - - - - - - - - - Other (CED)- - - - - - - - - - Other (2)- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Undetermined 22,200,000 - - 22,200,000 - - - 3,600,000 10,700,000 7,900,000 Total Sources 22,200,000 - - 22,200,000 - - - 3,600,000 10,700,000 7,900,000 - 22,200,000 Project Expenditures & Resources Programmed Programmed Pre-2019 Six-Year Program Sunset Area Green Connections 317 Vangie Garcia 425-430-7319 This project will construct multi-modal improvements identified in the Sunset Area Community Planned Action Study. Roadways will be widened/extended/realigned to provide for future traffic flows. Several residential streets will be developed as "green connections" improving pedestrian mobility and enhance the neighborhood. Roadways included are NE 10th St, NE Sunset Lane, Harrington Ave NE, NE 12th St, Edmonds Ave NE, Jefferson Ave NE, Kirkland Ave NE and Glennwood Ave NE. Improvements to these streets are key to support the redevelopment of the Sunset Area Community in the Highlands area, bounded by NE 21st St on the north, Edmonds Ave NE on the west, NE 7th St on the south, and Monroe Ave NE on the east. The City in partnership with the Renton Housing Authority aspires to redevelop the Sunset Terrace public housing community and encourage private delopment in the Planned Action Study area over a 20-year period. The total cost of the project is estimated at $22.2M. Schedule, cost and selection of streets to be improved to be determined. Significant cost participation will be required from development. Surface Water is leading this project and has completed two projects along Harrington Ave NE. 72 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019 - 2024 TIP No. 46 Project Title:SW 27th Street/Strander Boulevard Connection Community Planning Area:Valley Fund: Functional Classification:Minor Arterial Project: Project Length:1.27 mi Contact: Project Description: Justification: Status: Changes: Funded:Unfunded: Pre-2018 2018 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Expenditures: Planning - - - - - - - - - - Preliminary Engineering 5,030,912 5,030,912 - - - - - - - - R-O-W (includes Admin)3,842,563 3,842,563 - - - - - - - - Construction 16,798,111 16,748,111 50,000 - - - - - - - Construction Services 2,435,829 2,435,829 - - - - - - - - Post Construction Services 3,009,442 3,009,442 - - - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenses 31,116,857 31,066,857 50,000 - - - - - - - Resources: Vehicle Fuel Tax - - - - - - - - - - Interfund Loan 700,000 700,000 - - - - - - - - Gen & Prop Fund Balances 2,638,698 2,588,698 50,000 - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (State & Fed 2,408,422 2,408,422 - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (FMSIB)7,697,425 7,697,425 - - - - - - - - Mitigation 1,413,835 1,413,835 - - - - - - - - Bonds / LID's Formed 2,799,500 2,799,500 - - - - - - - - Other (Sound Transit & FRB)4,687,421 4,687,421 - - - - - - - - Other (STP & TIB)7,346,536 7,346,536 - - - - - - - - City of Tukwila Reimburse 1,000,000 1,000,000 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PW Utilities (Water/Surf Wat)425,020 425,020 - - - - - - - - Undetermined - - - - - - - - - - Total Sources 31,116,857 31,066,857 50,000 - - - - - - - SW 27th Street/Strander Boulevard Connection 29,691,837 - Project Expenditures & Resources Programmed Programmed Pre-2019 Six-Year Program The City of Tukwila has taken the lead for future phases. 317 122239, 122240 Keith Woolley 425-430-7318 The project will provide a grade-separated crossing at the Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) and Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) railroad tracks. Bicycle and pedestrian connections will be provided to the Tukwila Station and the Interurban Trail. Phase 1 - Seg 2a - 2 lane roadway from Naches Ave SW to the Sounder Station, including a BNSF bridge is completed. This project provides a critical four/five-lane arterial that will serve as a connector to West Valley Highway (SR 181) and East Valley Road, as well as an arterial connector to SR 167 from the south. A new east-west arterial roadway will connect the cities of Renton and Tukwila and provide significant congestion relief to existing arterials. The new road will provide access to the Tukwila Train/Sound Transit Station. The new grade separated arterial (UPRR and BNSF railroads) will provide significant benefits to both freight mobility and general motorists. 73 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019 - 2024 TIP No. 47 Project Title:Talbot Road S / S 177th Street Signalization & Roadway Improvements Community Planning Area:Talbot Fund: Functional Classification:Major Collector Project: Project Length:N/A Contact: Project Description: Justification: Status: Changes: Funded:Unfunded: Pre-2018 2018 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Expenditures: Planning - - - - - - - - - - Preliminary Engineering - - - - - - - - - - R-O-W (includes Admin)- - - - - - - - - - Construction 1,000,000 - 1,000,000 - - - - - - - Construction Services 25,000 - 25,000 - - - - - - - Post Construction Services - - - - - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenses 1,025,000 - 1,025,000 - - - - - - - Resources: Vehicle Fuel Tax - - - - - - - - - - Business & Occupation Share - - - - - - - - - - Fund Balance - - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (1)- - - - - - - - - - Grants Awarded (2)- - - - - - - - - - Mitigation - - - - - - - - - - Bonds / LID's Formed - - - - - - - - - - Other (Dev. Expenditure)1,025,000 - 1,025,000 - - - - - - - Other (Dev. Reimb)- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Undetermined - - - - - - - - - - Total Sources 1,025,000 - 1,025,000 - - - - - - - Talbot Road S / S 177th Street Signalization & Roadway Improvements 1,025,000 - Project Expenditures & Resources Programmed Programmed Pre-2019 Six-Year Program 317 Vangie Garcia 425-430-7319 This project involves installing a traffic signal and various roadway improvements including meeting pedestrian transit and bicycle needs. This project is proposed to meet recent traffic demand through this intersection and surrounding area as a result of the expansion of Valley Medical Center. The project is currently in design and will be starting construction in 2018 once they receive an approved permit. 74 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) Section F Appendix 2019 – 2024 Transportation Improvement Program 75 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) City of Renton | 2019 - 2024 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 25 Abbreviations and Acronyms The following list defines the abbreviated words and/or acronyms used in the City of Renton’s Six -Year Transportatfon Improvement Program. ACP Asphalt Concrete Pavement ADA American Disability Act BAT Business Access Transit BNSF Burlington Northern Santa Fe BRAC Bridge Replacement Advisory Committee CBD Central Business District CIP Capital Improvement Program CMAQ Congestfon Mitfgatfon and Air Quality CTR Commute Trip Reductfon (State Act) DOE Department of Ecology EB Eastbound ECL East City Limits EIS Environmental Impact Study ER Emergency Relief FHWA Federal Highway Administratfon FMSIB Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board GIS Geographic Informatfon System GMA Growth Management Act HOV High Occupancy Vehicles ITS Intelligent Transportatfon System LF Linear Feet LID Local Improvement District LOS Level of Service MAP-21 Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act METRO Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle MOU Memorandum of Understanding MUTCD Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices NCL North City Limits NB Northbound PMS Pavement Management System Precon Preconstructfon Engineering/Administratfon (design phase of project) PS&E Plans, Specificatfons, and Estfmates ROW Right-of-way RTA Regional Transit Authority SB Southbound SCATBd South County Area Transportatfon Board SCL South City Limits SOV Single Occupant Vehicle ST Sound Transit STP Surface Transportatfon Program TDM Transportatfon Demand Management Program TIB Transportatfon Improvement Board TIP Transportatfon Improvement Plan UPRR Union Pacific Railroad UPS Uninterruptfble Power Supple WB Westbound WCL West City Limits WSBIS Washington State Bridge Inventory System WSDOT Washington State Department of Transportatfon 76 AGENDA ITEM #7. k) AB - 2181 City Council Regular Meeting - 06 Aug 2018 SUBJECT/TITLE: Change Order No. 1 to CAG-17-174 with Laser Underground & Earthworks, Inc. for the Renton Hill Utility Replacement Project RECOMMENDED ACTION: Refer to Utilities Committee DEPARTMENT: Utility Systems Division STAFF CONTACT: John Hobson, Wastewater Utility Engineer EXT.: 7279 FISCAL IMPACT SUMMARY: Funding for Change Order No. 1 to CAG-17-174 with Laser Underground & Earthworks, Inc. for $302,406.79 is available through the approved 2018 Wastewater Utility, Water Utility, and Surface Water Utility Capital Improvement Program budgets for the Renton Hill Utility Replacement Project (426.465475, 425.455170, 427.475509). There is sufficient funding in the respective utility budgets for this change order. SUMMARY OF ACTION: The city is replacing water, sewer and storm pipelines in the Renton Hill neighborhood. The original project plan was to permanently patch all utility trenches and then the utility budgets would pay for the overlay of the affected streets as part of the 2019 street overlay program. Therefore, the asphalt overlay for this portion of Cedar Avenue South is not paid for in this project. Due to the narrow roadway and extensive utility replacement work on Cedar Avenue South between South 4th Street and South 6th Street, there was not enough of the original roadway asphalt remaining to properly patch the new utility trenches and await a full street overlay in 2019. In order to restore this portion of Cedar Avenue South to meet city standards, the remaining asp halt roadway, along with the temporary trench patches, have been completely removed and replaced with new crushed rock subgrade and asphalt. This construction work has been completed. The original estimate to patch the road this year then overlay next year for this portion of the project was approximately $243,600. The road has been completely rebuilt. Therefore there will no longer be a need for the utilities to provide funding to overlay the road as part of the 2019 asphalt overlay contract. Consi dering this future savings, the actual added cost to the utilities is approximately $58,807 [$302,407 (cost of change order rounded up), less $243,600 (estimated cost of road patching in 2018 and overlay in 2019)]. An added benefit is that the rebuilt road is sturdier than the original road was prior to excavating for the utility work. EXHIBITS: A. Change Order No. 1 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Execute Change Order No. 1 to CAG-17-174 with Laser Underground & Earthworks, Inc. in the amount of $302,406.79 for the rebuilding of Cedar Avenue South. AGENDA ITEM #7. l) H:\File Sys\WTR - Drinking Water Utility\WTR-27 - Water Project Files\WTR-27-03824 - 2015 Water Main Replacement\Pay Estimates\Change Orders\Change Order #1 - Renton Hill Utility Replacement.doc\JHmc CITY OF RENTON Public Works Department CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER AGREEMENT CONTRACT: Renton Hill Utility Replacement CAG-17-174 C.O.# 1 CONTRACTOR: Laser Underground & Earthworks, Inc. SUMMARY OF PROPOSED CHANGE: Provide all labor, equipment, subcontracting, bonding, insurance for the complete work required for the extra work as outlined below and shown in the contractor’s proposal dated May 22, 2018: ITEM Additional Quantities Under This Change Order Unit Qty. Unit Price Total Price A34. NEW ITEM: Surface Water Utility portion of costs to rebuild Cedar Ave S between S 4th St and S 6th St. Work to include removal of temporary trench patches, remainder of existing asphalt and existing subgrade material. Placement of new subgrade CSTC, new asphalt pavement and raising all utility covers to grade. LS 1 $74,227.12 $74,227.12 B31. NEW ITEM: Wastewater Utility portion of costs to rebuild Cedar Ave S between S 4th St and S 6th St. Work to include removal of temporary trench patches, remainder of existing asphalt and existing subgrade material. Placement of new subgrade CSTC, new asphalt pavement and raising all utility covers to grade. LS 1 $79,725.43 $79,725.43 C29. NEW ITEM: Water Utility portion of costs to rebuild Cedar Ave S between S 4th St and S 6th St. Work to include removal of temporary trench patches, remainder of existing asphalt and existing subgrade material. Placement of new subgrade CSTC, new asphalt pavement and raising all utility covers to grade. LS 1 $120,962.71 $120,962.71 Sub Total $274,915.26 Sales Tax (10.0%) $27,491.53 Total $302,406.79 ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT CURRENT CONTRACT AMOUNT ESTIMATED NET CHANGE THIS ORDER ESTIMATED CONTRACT TOTAL AFTER CHANGE $5,048,703.20 $5,048,703.20 $302,406.79 $5,351,109.99 SIGNATURES: Contractor: ____________________________________________________________________ Date: _______________ Project Engineer: _______________________________________________________________ Date: _______________ Approved By: __________________________________________________________________ Date: _______________ Lys Hornsby, Utility Systems Director Approved By: ___________________________________________________________________ Date: _______________ Gregg Zimmerman, PW Administrator Approved By: ___________________________________________________________________ Date: _______________ Denis Law, Mayor Approved By: ___________________________________________________________________ Date: _______________ Shane Moloney, Renton City Attorney Attest: ___________________________________________________________________ Date: _______________ Jason Seth, City Clerk AGENDA ITEM #7. l) 20417 87th Avenue SE, Snohomish, WA 98296 Phone: (425) 251-1636 Fax: (425) 251-1656 LASER UNDERGROUND & EARTHWORKS, INC. May 22, 2018 Cedar Ave S Road Reconstruction Meeting Roadway Reconstruction Mass Excavation/Paving Preparation - $92,623.57 - $26.46/SY • Remove asphalt (3,500SY) o Solo trucking required due to site limitations o Haul broken asphalt to stockpile yard • Lower utilities • Cut dirt to subgrade (3,500SY) o Solo trucking required due to site limitations o Haul dirt to stockpile yard • Place CSTC (3,500SY) o Solo trucking required due to site limitations o Haul CSTC from stockpile yard • Fine grading (3,500SY) • Sawcut perimeter as necessary • Raise utilities to grade after paving Stockpile Yard Import/Export - $55,200.99 – $15.77/SY • Stage CSTC with truck and trailers to stay ahead of mass ex • Haul off dirt and broken asphalt with truck and trailers Roadway Paving - $101,290.70 - $28.92/SY • Pave back 4” HMA (3,500SY) Utility Trench Patching Prep - $25,800.00 @ 3,500sy =$7.37/SY • Removed HMA • Removed Dirt • Placed CSTC The total cost for Cedar Ave Roadway Reconstruction is $274,915.26 plus applicable WSST. AGENDA ITEM #7. l) Page 1 of 3 FORCE ACCOUNT CHANGE ORDER Date of Work:Invoice Date: Owner: Project: Change #: Description: Work Type: LABOR Name Reg hrs OT hrs Total hrs Rate/hr Total Operator Foreman Lead 24 16 40 79.15$ =3,569.25$ Pipelayer 24 16 40 60.95$ =2,769.63$ Topman 24 16 40 59.61$ =2,705.46$ Equipment Operator 24 16 40 73.68$ =3,307.54$ Equipment Operator 24 16 40 73.68$ =3,307.54$ Equipment Operator 24 16 40 73.68$ =3,307.54$ Truck & Trailer Driver Lead 24 16 40 77.98$ =3,513.45$ Truck & Trailer Driver 24 16 40 75.07$ =3,373.94$ Truck & Trailer Driver 24 16 40 75.07$ =3,373.94$ Traffic Control Supervisor 24 16 40 55.44$ =2,506.25$ Flagger 24 16 40 51.66$ =2,325.45$ Subtotal - Labor 264 176 440 34,060.00$ EQUIPMENT Reg hrs Standby Rate/hr Total 2004 John Deere - 200LC Excavator W/Buckets @ 115.44$ =-$ 2014 John Deere - 135G Excavator W/Buckets 40 @ 98.24$ =3,929.60$ 2014 John Deere - 85G Excavator W/Buckets 40 @ 66.15$ =2,646.00$ 2013 John Deere - 85D Excavator W/Buckets @ 66.15$ =-$ 2016 John Deere - 35G Excavator W/Buckets @ 36.79$ =-$ 1994 Excavator Case 9020B - Excavator W/Hoe Pac and Buckets @ 88.56$ =-$ 1995 Case 650G Crawler Dozer @ 55.30$ =-$ 2012 John Deere 544 Loader 80 @ 55.28$ =4,422.40$ 2005 John Deere 310 SG Loader Backhoe 4x4 Extendahoe 40 @ 39.89$ =1,595.60$ 2005 John Deere 310 SG - Compactor Attachment 40 @ 7.23$ =289.20$ Breaker Attachment (per day)5 @ 475.00$ =2,375.00$ 2006 John Deere 310 SG Loader Backhoe 4x4 Extendahoe @ 39.89$ =-$ 2006 John Deere 310 SG - Compactor Attachment @ 7.23$ =-$ Breaker Attachment (per day)@ 475.00$ =-$ 2015 John Deere 310 SK Loader Backhoe 4x4 Extendahoe @ 42.71$ =-$ 2015 John Deere 310 SK - Compactor Attachment @ 7.23$ =-$ Breaker Attachment (per day)@ 475.00$ =-$ 2016 Peterbilt Dump Truck 80 @ 69.81$ =5,584.80$ 1999 Kenworth T-800 Dump Truck 40 @ 67.80$ =2,712.00$ 1988 International 5 Yard Dump Truck 40 @ 62.80$ =2,512.00$ 1996 Tiltbed Trailer (25 Ton)@ 18.00$ =-$ 1998 Sturdy Weld Pony Trailer - 4 axle pup @ 16.35$ =-$ 2015 20' Load T (4 Ton Trailer)@ 18.87$ =-$ 1999 F250 - (Delivery) - gold @ 23.00$ =-$ 2002 Service Truck - F350 Ford P/U - Truck & Tools (4WD)40 @ 32.52$ =1,300.80$ 2005 Chevy 1500 (4WD)40 @ 32.52$ =1,300.80$ 2006 F350 SuperDuty Truck & Tools (Delivery) - blue @ 34.68$ =-$ 2007 F450 SuperDuty Flatbed (Delivery) @ 36.52$ =-$ 2008 Chevy 1500 (4WD)@ 32.52$ =-$ Laser Underground City of Renton Change Orders Roadway Reconstruct Standard Laser Underground AGENDA ITEM #7. l) Page 2 of 3 FORCE ACCOUNT CHANGE ORDER 2014 GMC Sierra Truck & Tools (4WD)@ 39.00$ =-$ 2015 F350 SuperDuty Truck & Tools (4WD)40 @ 41.68$ =1,667.20$ 2001 Bomag BW 120 Roller @ 10.52$ =-$ 2002 Bomag BW 900 Roller @ 11.52$ =-$ 2003 Water Wagon - 2 Axel Trailer, 500gl Tank, Pump & Sprayer @ 15.72$ =-$ 2015 Water Wagon - 2 Axel Trailer, 500gl Tank, Pump & Sprayer 40 @ 15.72$ =628.80$ 2003 Lay Mor Power Sweeper @ 16.85$ =-$ 2016 Lay Mor Power Sweeper 40 @ 18.94$ =757.60$ 2004 Asphalt Zipper 480S W/Trailer @ 121.15$ =-$ 1992 Ingersol Rand Air Compressor @ 28.53$ =-$ 2016 Sulivan Air Compressor @ 32.84$ =-$ 2011 Vac Trailer 400-750 Gallon FX30 @ 35.67$ =-$ Speed Shore, Pump, Pump Can, Fin Form & Accessories @ 44.00$ =-$ Gravel Box - 5 Yd Skiff @ 18.00$ =-$ Traffic Plate ( 8 x 10)@ 10.00$ =-$ Traffic Plate ( 8 x 12)@ 12.00$ =-$ Traffic Plate ( 8 x 15)@ 15.00$ =-$ Traffic Plate ( 8 x 20)@ 20.00$ =-$ 2014 Interstate 20' Enclosed Tool Trailer 40 @ 15.00$ =600.00$ 2015 Interstate 20' Enclosed Tool Trailer @ 15.00$ =-$ Traffic Control Devices (Signs, Cones, Barricades, Etc)40 @ 22.00$ =880.00$ Jumping Jack/Plate Compactor @ 3.68$ =-$ Hole Hog @ 27.48$ =-$ @ = @ = Subtotal - Equipment 33,201.80$ DIRECT MATERIAL COST HMA Export @ 4" = 795 Cy Subtotal - Direct Material Cost -$ SUBCONTRACTORS 3,600.00$ 3,000.00$ 1,000.00$ Subtotal - Subcontractors 7,600.00$ Laser Underground Dirt Export @ 6" = 735 Cy Crushed Top Surfacing Import @ 6" = 1,100 Tons Truck and Trailer Rental - 5 days HMA Paving @ 4" = 795 Tons Laser Underground Seatac Sweeping Grading @ 2 days Sawcutting AGENDA ITEM #7. l) Page 3 of 3 FORCE ACCOUNT CHANGE ORDER Labor Subtotal 34,060.00$ + 29% Markup 9,877.40$ Total Labor 43,937.40$ Equipment Subtotal 33,201.80$ + 21% Markup 6,972.38$ Total Equipment 40,174.18$ Direct Material Cost Subtotal -$ + 21% Markup -$ Total Direct Material Cost -$ Subcontractors Subtotal 7,600.00$ + 12% Markup 912.00$ Total Subcontractors 8,512.00$ Subtotal Labor, Equipment, Direct Material Cost, Subcontractors 92,623.57$ + 0% Markup -$ Total 92,623.57$ 3515.666667 DETAILS 26.35$ Laser Underground Cedar Ave Reconstruction AGENDA ITEM #7. l) Page 1 of 3 FORCE ACCOUNT CHANGE ORDER Date of Work:Invoice Date: Owner: Project: Change #: Description: Work Type: LABOR Name Reg hrs OT hrs Total hrs Rate/hr Total Operator Foreman Lead 0 79.15$ =-$ Pipelayer 0 60.95$ =-$ Topman 0 59.61$ =-$ Equipment Operator 32 32 73.68$ =2,357.63$ Equipment Operator 0 73.68$ =-$ Truck & Trailer Driver Lead 0 77.98$ =-$ Truck & Trailer Driver 0 75.07$ =-$ Delivery Driver 0 41.61$ =-$ Traffic Control Supervisor 0 55.44$ =-$ Flagger 0 51.66$ =-$ Flagger 0 51.66$ =-$ Subtotal - Labor 32 0 32 2,357.63$ EQUIPMENT Reg hrs Standby Rate/hr Total 2004 John Deere - 200LC Excavator W/Buckets @ 115.44$ =-$ 2014 John Deere - 135G Excavator W/Buckets @ 98.24$ =-$ 2014 John Deere - 85G Excavator W/Buckets @ 66.15$ =-$ 2013 John Deere - 85D Excavator W/Buckets @ 66.15$ =-$ 2016 John Deere - 35G Excavator W/Buckets @ 36.79$ =-$ 1994 Excavator Case 9020B - Excavator W/Hoe Pac and Buckets @ 88.56$ =-$ 1995 Case 650G Crawler Dozer @ 55.30$ =-$ 2012 John Deere 544 Loader 32 @ 55.28$ =1,768.96$ 2005 John Deere 310 SG Loader Backhoe 4x4 Extendahoe @ 39.89$ =-$ 2005 John Deere 310 SG - Compactor Attachment @ 7.23$ =-$ Breaker Attachment (per day)@ 475.00$ =-$ 2006 John Deere 310 SG Loader Backhoe 4x4 Extendahoe @ 39.89$ =-$ 2006 John Deere 310 SG - Compactor Attachment @ 7.23$ =-$ Breaker Attachment (per day)@ 475.00$ =-$ 2015 John Deere 310 SK Loader Backhoe 4x4 Extendahoe @ 42.71$ =-$ 2015 John Deere 310 SK - Compactor Attachment @ 7.23$ =-$ Breaker Attachment (per day)@ 475.00$ =-$ 2016 Peterbilt Dump Truck @ 69.81$ =-$ 1999 Kenworth T-800 Dump Truck @ 67.80$ =-$ 1988 International 5 Yard Dump Truck @ 62.80$ =-$ 1996 Tiltbed Trailer (25 Ton)@ 18.00$ =-$ 1998 Sturdy Weld Pony Trailer - 4 axle pup @ 16.35$ =-$ 2015 20' Load T (4 Ton Trailer)@ 18.87$ =-$ 1999 F250 - (Delivery) - gold @ 23.00$ =-$ 2002 Service Truck - F350 Ford P/U - Truck & Tools (4WD)@ 32.52$ =-$ 2005 Chevy 1500 (4WD)@ 32.52$ =-$ 2006 F350 SuperDuty Truck & Tools (Delivery) - blue @ 34.68$ =-$ 2007 F450 SuperDuty Flatbed (Delivery) @ 36.52$ =-$ 2008 Chevy 1500 (4WD)@ 32.52$ =-$ Laser Underground City of Renton Change Orders Stockpile Materials Standard Laser Underground AGENDA ITEM #7. l) Page 2 of 3 FORCE ACCOUNT CHANGE ORDER 2014 GMC Sierra Truck & Tools (4WD)@ 39.00$ =-$ 2015 F350 SuperDuty Truck & Tools (4WD)@ 41.68$ =-$ 2001 Bomag BW 120 Roller @ 10.52$ =-$ 2002 Bomag BW 900 Roller @ 11.52$ =-$ 2003 Water Wagon - 2 Axel Trailer, 500gl Tank, Pump & Sprayer @ 15.72$ =-$ 2015 Water Wagon - 2 Axel Trailer, 500gl Tank, Pump & Sprayer @ 15.72$ =-$ 2003 Lay Mor Power Sweeper @ 16.85$ =-$ 2016 Lay Mor Power Sweeper @ 18.94$ =-$ 2004 Asphalt Zipper 480S W/Trailer @ 121.15$ =-$ 1992 Ingersol Rand Air Compressor @ 28.53$ =-$ 2016 Sulivan Air Compressor @ 32.84$ =-$ 2011 Vac Trailer 400-750 Gallon FX30 @ 35.67$ =-$ Speed Shore, Pump, Pump Can, Fin Form & Accessories @ 44.00$ =-$ Gravel Box - 5 Yd Skiff @ 18.00$ =-$ Traffic Plate ( 8 x 10)@ 10.00$ =-$ Traffic Plate ( 8 x 12)@ 12.00$ =-$ Traffic Plate ( 8 x 15)@ 15.00$ =-$ Traffic Plate ( 8 x 20)@ 20.00$ =-$ 2014 Interstate 20' Enclosed Tool Trailer @ 15.00$ =-$ 2015 Interstate 20' Enclosed Tool Trailer @ 15.00$ =-$ Traffic Control Devices (Signs, Cones, Barricades, Etc)@ 22.00$ =-$ Jumping Jack/Plate Compactor @ 3.68$ =-$ Hole Hog @ 27.48$ =-$ @ = @ = Subtotal - Equipment 1,768.96$ DIRECT MATERIAL COST HMA Export @ 4" = 795 Cy 8,347.50$ 6,180.68$ 8,250.00$ 18,560.00$ Subtotal - Direct Material Cost 41,338.18$ SUBCONTRACTORS Subtotal - Subcontractors -$ Laser Underground Dirt Export @ 6" = 735 Cy Crushed Top Surfacing Import @ 6" = 1,100 Tons Truck and Trailer Rental - 4 days x 4 trucks Laser Underground AGENDA ITEM #7. l) Page 3 of 3 FORCE ACCOUNT CHANGE ORDER Labor Subtotal 2,357.63$ + 29% Markup 683.71$ Total Labor 3,041.35$ Equipment Subtotal 1,768.96$ + 21% Markup 371.48$ Total Equipment 2,140.44$ Direct Material Cost Subtotal 41,338.18$ + 21% Markup 8,681.02$ Total Direct Material Cost 50,019.20$ Subcontractors Subtotal -$ + 12% Markup -$ Total Subcontractors -$ Subtotal Labor, Equipment, Direct Material Cost, Subcontractors 55,200.99$ + 0% Markup -$ Total 55,200.99$ 3515.67 DETAILS 15.70$ Laser Underground Cedar Ave S Materials AGENDA ITEM #7. l) Page 1 of 3 FORCE ACCOUNT CHANGE ORDER Date of Work:Invoice Date: Owner: Project: Change #: Description: Work Type: LABOR Name Reg hrs OT hrs Total hrs Rate/hr Total Operator Foreman Lead 32 32 79.15$ =2,532.82$ Pipelayer 32 32 60.95$ =1,950.34$ Topman 0 59.61$ =-$ Equipment Operator 32 32 73.68$ =2,357.63$ Equipment Operator 0 73.68$ =-$ Truck & Trailer Driver Lead 0 77.98$ =-$ Truck & Trailer Driver 0 75.07$ =-$ Delivery Driver 0 41.61$ =-$ Traffic Control Supervisor 32 32 55.44$ =1,774.03$ Flagger 16 16 51.66$ =826.51$ Flagger 16 16 51.66$ =826.51$ Subtotal - Labor 160 0 160 10,267.83$ EQUIPMENT Reg hrs Standby Rate/hr Total 2004 John Deere - 200LC Excavator W/Buckets @ 115.44$ =-$ 2014 John Deere - 135G Excavator W/Buckets @ 98.24$ =-$ 2014 John Deere - 85G Excavator W/Buckets @ 66.15$ =-$ 2013 John Deere - 85D Excavator W/Buckets @ 66.15$ =-$ 2016 John Deere - 35G Excavator W/Buckets @ 36.79$ =-$ 1994 Excavator Case 9020B - Excavator W/Hoe Pac and Buckets @ 88.56$ =-$ 1995 Case 650G Crawler Dozer @ 55.30$ =-$ 2012 John Deere 544 Loader 16 @ 55.28$ =884.48$ 2005 John Deere 310 SG Loader Backhoe 4x4 Extendahoe 16 @ 39.89$ =638.24$ 2005 John Deere 310 SG - Compactor Attachment @ 7.23$ =-$ Breaker Attachment (per day)@ 475.00$ =-$ 2006 John Deere 310 SG Loader Backhoe 4x4 Extendahoe @ 39.89$ =-$ 2006 John Deere 310 SG - Compactor Attachment @ 7.23$ =-$ Breaker Attachment (per day)@ 475.00$ =-$ 2015 John Deere 310 SK Loader Backhoe 4x4 Extendahoe @ 42.71$ =-$ 2015 John Deere 310 SK - Compactor Attachment @ 7.23$ =-$ Breaker Attachment (per day)@ 475.00$ =-$ 2016 Peterbilt Dump Truck @ 69.81$ =-$ 1999 Kenworth T-800 Dump Truck @ 67.80$ =-$ 1988 International 5 Yard Dump Truck @ 62.80$ =-$ 1996 Tiltbed Trailer (25 Ton)@ 18.00$ =-$ 1998 Sturdy Weld Pony Trailer - 4 axle pup @ 16.35$ =-$ 2015 20' Load T (4 Ton Trailer)@ 18.87$ =-$ 1999 F250 - (Delivery) - gold @ 23.00$ =-$ 2002 Service Truck - F350 Ford P/U - Truck & Tools (4WD)@ 32.52$ =-$ 2005 Chevy 1500 (4WD)@ 32.52$ =-$ 2006 F350 SuperDuty Truck & Tools (Delivery) - blue @ 34.68$ =-$ 2007 F450 SuperDuty Flatbed (Delivery) @ 36.52$ =-$ 2008 Chevy 1500 (4WD)@ 32.52$ =-$ Laser Underground City of Renton Change Orders Paving Standard Laser Underground AGENDA ITEM #7. l) Page 2 of 3 FORCE ACCOUNT CHANGE ORDER 2014 GMC Sierra Truck & Tools (4WD)@ 39.00$ =-$ 2015 F350 SuperDuty Truck & Tools (4WD)32 @ 41.68$ =1,333.76$ 2001 Bomag BW 120 Roller @ 10.52$ =-$ 2002 Bomag BW 900 Roller @ 11.52$ =-$ 2003 Water Wagon - 2 Axel Trailer, 500gl Tank, Pump & Sprayer @ 15.72$ =-$ 2015 Water Wagon - 2 Axel Trailer, 500gl Tank, Pump & Sprayer @ 15.72$ =-$ 2003 Lay Mor Power Sweeper @ 16.85$ =-$ 2016 Lay Mor Power Sweeper @ 18.94$ =-$ 2004 Asphalt Zipper 480S W/Trailer @ 121.15$ =-$ 1992 Ingersol Rand Air Compressor 16 @ 28.53$ =456.48$ 2016 Sulivan Air Compressor @ 32.84$ =-$ 2011 Vac Trailer 400-750 Gallon FX30 @ 35.67$ =-$ Speed Shore, Pump, Pump Can, Fin Form & Accessories @ 44.00$ =-$ Gravel Box - 5 Yd Skiff @ 18.00$ =-$ Traffic Plate ( 8 x 10)@ 10.00$ =-$ Traffic Plate ( 8 x 12)@ 12.00$ =-$ Traffic Plate ( 8 x 15)@ 15.00$ =-$ Traffic Plate ( 8 x 20)@ 20.00$ =-$ 2014 Interstate 20' Enclosed Tool Trailer @ 15.00$ =-$ 2015 Interstate 20' Enclosed Tool Trailer @ 15.00$ =-$ Traffic Control Devices (Signs, Cones, Barricades, Etc)16 @ 22.00$ =352.00$ Jumping Jack/Plate Compactor @ 3.68$ =-$ Hole Hog @ 27.48$ =-$ @ = @ = Subtotal - Equipment 3,664.96$ DIRECT MATERIAL COST Subtotal - Direct Material Cost -$ SUBCONTRACTORS 1,440.00$ 73,140.00$ Subtotal - Subcontractors 74,580.00$ Laser Underground HMA Paving @ 4" = 795 Tons Laser Underground Seatac Sweeping AGENDA ITEM #7. l) Page 3 of 3 FORCE ACCOUNT CHANGE ORDER Labor Subtotal 10,267.83$ + 29% Markup 2,977.67$ Total Labor 13,245.50$ Equipment Subtotal 3,664.96$ + 21% Markup 769.64$ Total Equipment 4,434.60$ Direct Material Cost Subtotal -$ + 21% Markup -$ Total Direct Material Cost -$ Subcontractors Subtotal 74,580.00$ + 12% Markup 8,949.60$ Total Subcontractors 83,529.60$ Subtotal Labor, Equipment, Direct Material Cost, Subcontractors 101,209.70$ + 0% Markup -$ Total 101,209.70$ 3515.67 DETAILS 28.79$ Laser Underground Cedar Ave S Paving AGENDA ITEM #7. l) Page 1 of 3 FORCE ACCOUNT CHANGE ORDER Date of Work:Invoice Date: Owner: Project: Change #: Description: Work Type: LABOR Name Reg hrs OT hrs Total hrs Rate/hr Total Operator Foreman Lead 16 16 79.15$ =1,266.41$ Pipelayer 16 16 60.95$ =975.17$ Topman 16 16 59.61$ =953.69$ Equipment Operator 16 16 73.68$ =1,178.82$ Equipment Operator 16 16 73.68$ =1,178.82$ Truck & Trailer Driver Lead 16 16 77.98$ =1,247.73$ Truck & Trailer Driver 16 16 75.07$ =1,201.04$ Delivery Driver 0 41.61$ =-$ Traffic Control Supervisor 16 16 55.44$ =887.02$ Flagger 0 51.66$ =-$ Flagger 0 51.66$ =-$ Subtotal - Labor 128 0 128 8,888.69$ EQUIPMENT Reg hrs Standby Rate/hr Total 2004 John Deere - 200LC Excavator W/Buckets @ 115.44$ =-$ 2014 John Deere - 135G Excavator W/Buckets 16 @ 98.24$ =1,571.84$ 2014 John Deere - 85G Excavator W/Buckets @ 66.15$ =-$ 2013 John Deere - 85D Excavator W/Buckets @ 66.15$ =-$ 2016 John Deere - 35G Excavator W/Buckets @ 36.79$ =-$ 1994 Excavator Case 9020B - Excavator W/Hoe Pac and Buckets @ 88.56$ =-$ 1995 Case 650G Crawler Dozer @ 55.30$ =-$ 2012 John Deere 544 Loader @ 55.28$ =-$ 2005 John Deere 310 SG Loader Backhoe 4x4 Extendahoe 16 @ 39.89$ =638.24$ 2005 John Deere 310 SG - Compactor Attachment @ 7.23$ =-$ Breaker Attachment (per day)@ 475.00$ =-$ 2006 John Deere 310 SG Loader Backhoe 4x4 Extendahoe @ 39.89$ =-$ 2006 John Deere 310 SG - Compactor Attachment @ 7.23$ =-$ Breaker Attachment (per day)@ 475.00$ =-$ 2015 John Deere 310 SK Loader Backhoe 4x4 Extendahoe @ 42.71$ =-$ 2015 John Deere 310 SK - Compactor Attachment @ 7.23$ =-$ Breaker Attachment (per day)@ 475.00$ =-$ 2016 Peterbilt Dump Truck 16 @ 69.81$ =1,116.96$ 1999 Kenworth T-800 Dump Truck 16 @ 67.80$ =1,084.80$ 1988 International 5 Yard Dump Truck @ 62.80$ =-$ 1996 Tiltbed Trailer (25 Ton)@ 18.00$ =-$ 1998 Sturdy Weld Pony Trailer - 4 axle pup @ 16.35$ =-$ 2015 20' Load T (4 Ton Trailer)@ 18.87$ =-$ 1999 F250 - (Delivery) - gold @ 23.00$ =-$ 2002 Service Truck - F350 Ford P/U - Truck & Tools (4WD)@ 32.52$ =-$ 2005 Chevy 1500 (4WD)@ 32.52$ =-$ 2006 F350 SuperDuty Truck & Tools (Delivery) - blue @ 34.68$ =-$ 2007 F450 SuperDuty Flatbed (Delivery) @ 36.52$ =-$ 2008 Chevy 1500 (4WD)@ 32.52$ =-$ Laser Underground City of Renton Change Orders 1 Utility Trench Patch Prep Standard Laser Underground AGENDA ITEM #7. l) Page 2 of 3 FORCE ACCOUNT CHANGE ORDER 2014 GMC Sierra Truck & Tools (4WD)@ 24.81$ =-$ 2015 F350 SuperDuty Truck & Tools (4WD)16 @ 41.68$ =666.88$ 2001 Bomag BW 120 Roller @ 10.52$ =-$ 2002 Bomag BW 900 Roller @ 11.52$ =-$ 2003 Water Wagon - 2 Axel Trailer, 500gl Tank, Pump & Sprayer @ 15.72$ =-$ 2015 Water Wagon - 2 Axel Trailer, 500gl Tank, Pump & Sprayer @ 15.72$ =-$ 2003 Lay Mor Power Sweeper @ 16.85$ =-$ 2016 Lay Mor Power Sweeper @ 18.94$ =-$ 2004 Asphalt Zipper 480S W/Trailer @ 121.15$ =-$ 1992 Ingersol Rand Air Compressor @ 28.53$ =-$ 2016 Sulivan Air Compressor @ 32.84$ =-$ 2011 Vac Trailer 400-750 Gallon FX30 @ 35.67$ =-$ Speed Shore, Pump, Pump Can, Fin Form & Accessories @ 44.00$ =-$ Gravel Box - 5 Yd Skiff @ 18.00$ =-$ Traffic Plate ( 8 x 10)@ 10.00$ =-$ Traffic Plate ( 8 x 12)@ 12.00$ =-$ Traffic Plate ( 8 x 15)@ 15.00$ =-$ Traffic Plate ( 8 x 20)@ 20.00$ =-$ 2014 Interstate 20' Enclosed Tool Trailer @ 15.00$ =-$ 2015 Interstate 20' Enclosed Tool Trailer @ 15.00$ =-$ Traffic Control Devices (Signs, Cones, Barricades, Etc)@ 22.00$ =-$ Jumping Jack/Plate Compactor @ 3.68$ =-$ Hole Hog @ 27.48$ =-$ @ = @ = Subtotal - Equipment 5,078.72$ DIRECT MATERIAL COST 3,375.00$ 3,392.22$ Subtotal - Direct Material Cost 6,767.22$ SUBCONTRACTORS Subtotal - Subcontractors -$ Laser Underground CSTC HMA Haul Off Laser Underground AGENDA ITEM #7. l) Page 3 of 3 FORCE ACCOUNT CHANGE ORDER Labor Subtotal 8,888.69$ + 29% Markup 2,577.72$ Total Labor 11,466.41$ Equipment Subtotal 5,078.72$ + 21% Markup 1,066.53$ Total Equipment 6,145.25$ Direct Material Cost Subtotal 6,767.22$ + 21% Markup 1,421.12$ Total Direct Material Cost 8,188.33$ Subcontractors Subtotal -$ + 12% Markup -$ Total Subcontractors -$ Subtotal Labor, Equipment, Direct Material Cost, Subcontractors 25,800.00$ + 0% Markup -$ Total 25,800.00$ DETAILS Laser Underground Utility Trench patching prep. Remove and dispose of asphalt. Place CSTC. AGENDA ITEM #7. l) AB - 2186 City Council Regular Meeting - 06 Aug 2018 SUBJECT/TITLE: Agreement for Downtown Utility Improvement Project, Phase 2 Preliminary Engineering and Design RECOMMENDED ACTION: Refer to Utilities Committee DEPARTMENT: Utility Systems Division STAFF CONTACT: Abdoul Gafour, Water Utility Engineering Manager EXT.: 7210 FISCAL IMPACT SUMMARY: Funding for this agreement in the amount of $683,735 is available from the approved 2018 Water, Wastewater, and Surface Water Utility Capital Improvement Program budgets for the Downtown Utility Improvement Project. There is sufficient funding in the respective budgets to cover this agreement: • Water Utility (425.455590) - $136,947 budgeted, total project budget of $500,000. • Wastewater Utility (426.465517) - $273,394 budgeted, total project budget of $2,900,000. • Surface Water Utility (427.475510) - $273,394 budgeted, total project budget of $6,568,536. SUMMARY OF ACTION: The Water, Wastewater, and Surface Water utilities have identified existing infrastructure in the downtown area associated with the proposed roadway improvements to convert existing one-way roadways to two-way roadways. The old utility infrastructure needs to be replaced and upsized to accommodate future economic development and redevelopment projects in the downtown corridor to facilitate revitalization of the area. Replacement of the utilities in advance of the conversion of downtown streets from one-way to two-way streets will allow the roadway improvements to proceed without delay or conflict with utility infrastructure improvements. In March 2017 the city solicited proposals and statement of qualifications for engineering services for the Downtown Utility Improvement Project through the Municipal Rese arch Services Center (MSRC) Consultant Roster and selected Murraysmith, Inc. to perform the work for all phases of the project. Murraysmith, Inc. has completed Phase 1 of the project (CAG-17-066) which consisted of the development of the Conceptual Design Report including identification of system deficiencies, determination of alternative improvements and planning level cost estimates. Under this agreement for Phase 2, Murraysmith, Inc. will advance the conceptual design to a 50% design level for the proposed utility improvements. The work will include: 1. Topographical surveying for preparation of base maps. 2. Potholing existing utilities to verify for potential conflicts. 3. Coordination with other public and private utility companies. 4. Performing public outreach. 5. Developing preliminary layout of the utilities. AGENDA ITEM #7. m) 6. Development of the 30% and 50% design plans and specifications. EXHIBITS: A. Agreement STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Execute the agreement with Murraysmith, Inc. in the amount of $683,735 for Phase 2 of the Downtown Utility Improvement Project. AGENDA ITEM #7. m) AGREEMENT FOR DOWNTOWN UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT – PHASE 2: PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING AND DESIGN THIS AGREEMENT, dated _______________________, is by and between the City of Renton (the “City”), a Washington municipal corporation, and Murraysmith, Inc (“Consultant”), an Oregon corporation. The City and the Consultant are referred to collectively in this Agreement as the “Parties.” Once fully executed by the Parties, this Agreement is effective as of the last date signed by both parties. 1. Scope of Work: Consultant agrees to provide consultant services as specified in Exhibit A, which is attached and incorporated herein and may hereinafter be referred to as the “Work.” 2. Changes in Scope of Work: The City, without invalidating this Agreement, may order changes to the Work consisting of additions, deletions or modifications. Any such changes to the Work shall be ordered by the City in writing and the Compensation shall be equitably adjusted consistent with the rates set forth in Exhibit D or as otherwise mutually agreed by the Parties. 3. Time of Performance: Consultant shall commence performance of the Agreement pursuant to the schedule(s) set forth in Exhibit B. All Work shall be performed by no later than August 31, 2019. 4. Compensation: A. Amount. Total compensation to Consultant for Work provided pursuant to this Agreement shall not exceed $683,735.00, plus any applicable state and local sales taxes. Compensation shall be paid based upon Work actually performed according to the rate(s) or amounts specified in Exhibits C & D. The Consultant agrees that any hourly or flat rate charged by it for its Work shall remain locked at the negotiated rate(s) unless otherwise agreed to in writing or provided in Exhibit D. Except as specifically provided herein, the Consultant shall be solely responsible for payment of any taxes imposed as a result of the performance and payment of this Agreement. B. Method of Payment. On a monthly or no less than quarterly basis during any quarter in which Work is performed, the Consultant shall submit a voucher or invoice in a form specified by the City, including a description of what Work has been performed, the name of the personnel performing such Work, and any hourly labor charge rate for AGENDA ITEM #7. m) PAGE 2 OF 10 such personnel. The Consultant shall also submit a final bill upon completion of all Work. Payment shall be made by the City for Work performed within thirty (30) calendar days after receipt and approval by the appropriate City representative of the voucher or invoice. If the Consultant’s performance does not meet the requirements of this Agreement, the Consultant will correct or modify its performance to comply with the Agreement. The City may withhold payment for work that does not meet the requirements of this Agreement. C. Effect of Payment. Payment for any part of the Work shall not constitute a waiver by the City of any remedies it may have against the Consultant for failure of the Consultant to perform the Work or for any breach of this Agreement by the Consultant. D. Non-Appropriation of Funds. If sufficient funds are not appropriated or allocated for payment under this Agreement for any future fiscal period, the City shall not be obligated to make payments for Work or amounts incurred after the end of the current fiscal period, and this Agreement will terminate upon the completion of all remaining Work for which funds are allocated. No penalty or expense shall accrue to the City in the event this provision applies. 5. Termination: A. The City reserves the right to terminate this Agreement at any time, with or without cause by giving ten (10) calendar days’ notice to the Consultant in writing. In the event of such termination or suspension, all finished or unfinished documents, data, studies, worksheets, models and reports, or other material prepared by the Consultant pursuant to this Agreement shall be submitted to the City, if any are required as part of the Work. B. In the event this Agreement is terminated by the City, the Consultant shall be entitled to payment for all hours worked to the effective date of termination, less all payments previously made. If the Agreement is terminated by the City after partial performance of Work for which the agreed compensation is a fixed fee, the City shall pay the Consultant an equitable share of the fixed fee. This provision shall not prevent the City from seeking any legal remedies it may have for the violation or nonperformance of any of the provisions of this Agreement and such charges due to the City shall be deducted from the final payment due the Consultant. No payment shall be made by the City for any expenses incurred or work done following the effective date of termination unless authorized in advance in writing by the City. 6. Warranties And Right To Use Work Product: Consultant represents and warrants that Consultant will perform all Work identified in this Agreement in a professional and workmanlike manner and in accordance with all reasonable and professional standards AGENDA ITEM #7. m) PAGE 3 OF 10 and laws. Compliance with professional standards includes, as applicable, performing the Work in compliance with applicable City standards or guidelines (e.g. design criteria and Standard Plans for Road, Bridge and Municipal Construction). Professional engineers shall certify engineering plans, specifications, plats, and reports, as applicable, pursuant to RCW 18.43.070. Consultant further represents and warrants that all final work product created for and delivered to the City pursuant to this Agreement shall be the original work of the Consultant and free from any intellectual property encumbrance which would restrict the City from using the work product. Consultant grants to the City a non- exclusive, perpetual right and license to use, reproduce, distribute, adapt, modify, and display all final work product produced pursuant to this Agreement. The City’s or other’s adaptation, modification or use of the final work products other than for the purposes of this Agreement shall be without liability to the Consultant. The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. 7. Record Maintenance: The Consultant shall maintain accounts and records, which properly reflect all direct and indirect costs expended and Work provided in the performance of this Agreement and retain such records for as long as may be required by applicable Washington State records retention laws, but in any event no less than six years after the termination of this Agreement. The Consultant agrees to provide access to and copies of any records related to this Agreement as required by the City to audit expenditures and charges and/or to comply with the Washington State Public Records Act (Chapter 42.56 RCW). The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. 8. Public Records Compliance: To the full extent the City determines necessary to comply with the Washington State Public Records Act, Consultant shall make a due diligent search of all records in its possession or control relating to this Agreement and the Work, including, but not limited to, e-mail, correspondence, notes, saved telephone messages, recordings, photos, or drawings and provide them to the City for production. In the event Consultant believes said records need to be protected from disclosure, it may, at Consultant’s own expense, seek judicial protection. Consultant shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City for all costs, including attorneys’ fees, attendant to any claim or litigation related to a Public Records Act request for which Consultant ha s responsive records and for which Consultant has withheld records or information contained therein, or not provided them to the City in a timely manner. Consultant shall produce for distribution any and all records responsive to the Public Records Act req uest in a timely manner, unless those records are protected by court order. The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. 9. Independent Contractor Relationship: A. The Consultant is retained by the City only for the purposes and to the extent set forth in this Agreement. The nature of the relationship between the Consultant and the City AGENDA ITEM #7. m) PAGE 4 OF 10 during the period of the Work shall be that of an independent contractor, not employee. The Consultant, not the City, shall have the power to control and direct the details, manner or means of Work. Specifically, but not by means of limitation, the Consultant shall have no obligation to work any particular hours or particular schedule, unless otherwise indicated in the Scope of Work or where scheduling of attendance or performance is mutually arranged due to the nature of the Work. Consultant shall retain the right to designate the means of performing the Work covered by this agreement, and the Consultant shall be entitled to employ other workers at such compensation and such other conditions as it may deem proper, provided, however, that any contract so made by the Consultant is to be paid by it alone, and that employing such workers, it is acting individually and not as an agent for the City. B. The City shall not be responsible for withholding or otherwise deducting federal income tax or Social Security or contributing to the State Industrial Insurance Program, or otherwise assuming the duties of an employer with respect to Consultant or any employee of the Consultant. C. If the Consultant is a sole proprietorship or if this Agreement is with an individual, the Consultant agrees to notify the City and complete any required form if the Consultant retired under a State of Washington retirement system and agrees to indemnify any losses the City may sustain through the Consultant’s failure to do so. 10. Hold Harmless: The Consultant agrees to release, indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City, elected officials, employees, officers, representatives, and volunteers from any and all claims, demands, actions, suits, causes of action, arbitrations, mediations, proceedings, judgments, awards, injuries, damages, liabilities, taxes, losses, fines, fees, penalties, expenses, attorney’s or attorneys’ fees, costs, and/or litigation expenses to or by any and all persons or entities, arising from, resulting from, or related to the negligent acts, errors or omissions of the Consultant in its performance of this Agreement or a breach of this Agreement by Consultant , except for that portion of the claims caused by the City’s sole negligence. Should a court of competent jurisdiction determine that this agreement is subject to RCW 4.24.115, (Validity of agreement to indemnify against liability for negligence relative to construction, alteration, improvement, etc., of structure or improvement attached to real estate…) then, in the event of liability for damages arising out of bodily injury to persons or damages to property caused by or resulting from the concurrent negligence of the Consultant and the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers, Consultant’s liability shall be only to the extent of Consultant’s negligence. AGENDA ITEM #7. m) PAGE 5 OF 10 It is further specifically and expressly understood that the indemnification provided in this Agreement constitute Consultant’s waiver of immunity under the Industrial Insurance Act, RCW Title 51, solely for the purposes of this indemnification. The Parties have mutually negotiated and agreed to this waiver. The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. 11. Gifts and Conflicts: The City’s Code of Ethics and Washington State law prohibit City employees from soliciting, accepting, or receiving any gift, gratuity or favor from any person, firm or corporation involved in a contract or transaction. To ensure compliance with the City’s Code of Ethics and state law, the Consultant shall not give a gift of any kind to City employees or officials. Consultant also confirms that Consultant does not have a business interest or a close family relationship with any City officer or employee who was, is, or will be involved in selecting the Consultant, negotiating or administering this Agreement, or evaluating the Consultant’s performance of the Work. 12. City of Renton Business License: The Consultant shall obtain a City of Renton Business License prior to performing any Work and maintain the business license in good standing throughout the term of this agreement with the City. Information regarding acquiring a city business license can be found at: http://www.rentonwa.gov/cms/One.aspx?portalId=7922741&pageId=9824882 Information regarding State business licensing requirements can be found at: http://dor.wa.gov/doing-business/register-my-business 13. Insurance: Consultant shall secure and maintain: A. Commercial general liability insurance in the minimum amounts of $1,000,000 for each occurrence/$2,000,000 aggregate for the Term of this Agreement. B. In the event that Work delivered pursuant to this Agreement either directly or indirectly involve or require Professional Services, Professional Liability, Errors and Omissions coverage shall be provided with minimum limits of $1,000,000 per occurrence. "Professional Services", for the purpose of this section, shall mean any Work provided by a licensed professional or Work that requires a professional standard of care. C. Workers’ compensation coverage, as required by the Industrial Insurance laws of the State of Washington, shall also be secured. D. Commercial Automobile Liability for owned, leased, hired or non-owned, leased, hired or non-owned, with minimum limits of $1,000,000 per occurrence combined single AGENDA ITEM #7. m) PAGE 6 OF 10 limit, if there will be any use of Consultant’s vehicles on the City’s Pr emises by or on behalf of the City, beyond normal commutes. E. Consultant shall name the City as an Additional Insured on its commercial general liability policy on a non-contributory primary basis. The City’s insurance policies shall not be a source for payment of any Consultant liability, nor shall the maintenance of any insurance required by this Agreement be construed to limit the liability of Consultant to the coverage provided by such insurance or otherwise limit the City’s recourse to any remedy available at law or in equity. F. Subject to the City’s review and acceptance, a certificate of insurance showing the proper endorsements, shall be delivered to the City before performing the Work. G. Consultant shall provide the City with written notice of any policy cancellation, within two (2) business days of their receipt of such notice. 14. Delays: Consultant is not responsible for delays caused by factors beyond the Consultant’s reasonable control. When such delays beyond the Consultant’s reasonable control occur, the City agrees the Consultant is not responsible for damages, nor shall the Consultant be deemed to be in default of the Agreement. 15. Successors and Assigns: Neither the City nor the Consultant shall assign, transfer or encumber any rights, duties or interests accruing from this Agreement without the written consent of the other. 16. Notices: Any notice required under this Agreement will be in writing, addressed to the appropriate party at the address which appears below (as modified in writing from time to time by such party), and given personally, by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, by facsimile or by nationally recognized overnight courier service. Time period for notices shall be deemed to have commenced upon the date of receipt, EXCEPT facsimile delivery will be deemed to have commenced on the first business day following transmission. Email and telephone may be used for purposes of administering the Agreement, but should not be used to give any formal notice required by the Agreement. CITY OF RENTON David M. Christensen 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 Phone: (425) 430-7212 dchristensen@rentonwa.gov Fax: (425) 430-7241 CONSULTANT Jeff Kreshel, P.E. 520 Pike Street, Suite1350 Seattle, WA 98101 Phone: (206) 462-7030 Jeff.Kreshel@murraysmith.us Fax: (866) 274-9807 AGENDA ITEM #7. m) PAGE 7 OF 10 17. Discrimination Prohibited: Except to the extent permitted by a bona fide occupational qualification, the Consultant agrees as follows: A. Consultant, and Consultant’s agents, employees, representatives, and volunteers with regard to the Work performed or to be performed under this Agreement, shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color, sex, religion, nationality, creed, marital status, sexual orientation or preference, age (except minimum age and retirement provisions), honorably discharged veteran or military status, or the presence of any sensory, mental or physical handicap, unless based upon a bona fide occupational qualification in relationship to hiring and employment, in employment or application for employment, the administration of the delivery of Work or any other benefits under this Agreement, or procurement of materials or supplies. B. The Consultant will take affirmative action to insure that applicants are employed and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, creed, color, national origin, sex, age, sexual orientation, physical, sensory or mental handicaps, or marital status. Such action shall include, but not be limited to the following employment, upgrading, demotion or transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination, rates of pay or other forms of compensation and selection for training. C. If the Consultant fails to comply with any of this Agreement’s non-discrimination provisions, the City shall have the right, at its option, to cancel the Agreement in whole or in part. D. The Consultant is responsible to be aware of and in compliance with all federal, state and local laws and regulations that may affect the satisfactory completion of the project, which includes but is not limited to fair labor laws, worker's compensation, and Title VI of the Federal Civil Rights Act of 1964, and will comply with City of Renton Council Resolution Number 4085. 18. Miscellaneous: The parties hereby acknowledge: A. The City is not responsible to train or provide training for Consultant. B. Consultant will not be reimbursed for job related expenses except to the extent specifically agreed within the attached exhibits. C. Consultant shall furnish all tools and/or materials necessary to perform the Work except to the extent specifically agreed within the attached exhibits. D. In the event special training, licensing, or certification is required for Consultant to provide Work he/she will acquire or maintain such at his/her own expense and, if AGENDA ITEM #7. m) PAGE 8 OF 10 Consultant employs, sub-contracts, or otherwise assigns the responsibility to perform the Work, said employee/sub-contractor/assignee will acquire and or maintain such training, licensing, or certification. E. This is a non-exclusive agreement and Consultant is free to provide his/her Work to other entities, so long as there is no interruption or interference with the provision of Work called for in this Agreement. F. Consultant is responsible for his/her own insurance, including, but not limited to health insurance. G. Consultant is responsible for his/her own Worker’s Compensation coverage as well as that for any persons employed by the Consultant. 19. Other Provisions: A. Approval Authority. Each individual executing this Agreement on behalf of the City and Consultant represents and warrants that such individuals are duly authorized to execute and deliver this Agreement on behalf of the City or Consultant. B. General Administration and Management. The City’s project manager is David M. Christensen. In providing Work, Consultant shall coordinate with the City’s contract manager or his/her designee. C. Amendment and Modification. This Agreement may be amended only by an instrument in writing, duly executed by both Parties. D. Conflicts. In the event of any inconsistencies between Consultant proposals and this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall prevail. Any exhibits/attachments to this Agreement are incorporated by reference only to the extent of the purpose for which they are referenced within this Agreement. To the extent a Consultant prepared exhibit conflicts with the terms in the body of this Agreement or contains terms that are extraneous to the purpose for which it is referenced, the terms in the body of this Agreement shall prevail and the extraneous terms shall not be incorporated herein. E. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be made in and shall be governed by and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington and the City of Renton. Consultant and all of the Consultant’s employees shall perform the Work in accordance with all applicable federal, state, county and city laws, codes and ordinances. F. Joint Drafting Effort. This Agreement shall be considered for all purposes as prepared by the joint efforts of the Parties and shall not be construed against one party or the AGENDA ITEM #7. m) PAGE 9 OF 10 other as a result of the preparation, substitution, submission or other event of negotiation, drafting or execution. G. Jurisdiction and Venue. Any lawsuit or legal action brought by any party to enforce or interpret this Agreement or any of its terms or covenants shall be brought in the King County Superior Court for the State of Washington at the Maleng Regional Justice Center in Kent, King County, Washington, or its replacement or successor. H. Severability. A court of competent jurisdiction’s determination that any provision or part of this Agreement is illegal or unenforceable shall not cancel or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement, which shall remain in full force and effect. I. Sole and Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the Parties and any representations or understandings, whether oral or written, not incorporated are excluded. J. Time is of the Essence. Time is of the essence of this Agreement and each and all of its provisions in which performance is a factor. Adherence to completion dates set forth in the description of the Work is essential to the Consultant’s performance of this Agreement. K. Third-Party Beneficiaries. Nothing in this Agreement is intended to, nor shall be construed to give any rights or benefits in the Agreement to anyone other than the Parties, and all duties and responsibilities undertaken pursuant to this Agreement will be for the sole and exclusive benefit of the Parties and no one else. L. Binding Effect. The Parties each bind themselves, their partners, successors, assigns, and legal representatives to the other party to this Agreement, and to the partners, successors, assigns, and legal representatives of such other party with respect to all covenants of the Agreement. M. Waivers. All waivers shall be in writing and signed by the waiving party. Either party’s failure to enforce any provision of this Agreement shall not be a waiver and shall not prevent either the City or Consultant from enforcing that provision or any other provision of this Agreement in the future. Waiver of breach of any provision of this Agreement shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any prior or subsequent breach unless it is expressly waived in writing. N. Counterparts. The Parties may execute this Agreement in any number of counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original, and all of which will together constitute this one Agreement. AGENDA ITEM #7. m) PAGE 10 OF 10 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have voluntarily entered into this Agreement as of the date last signed by the Parties below. CITY OF RENTON By:_____________________________ CONSULTANT By:____________________________ Denis Law Mayor Jeffrey S. Kreshel, P.E. Principal Engineer _____________________________ Date _____________________________ Date Attest _____________________________ Jason A. Seth City Clerk Approved as to Legal Form _____________________________ Shane Moloney Renton City Attorney Contract Template Updated 04/10/2018 AGENDA ITEM #7. m) City of Renton MURRAYSMITH DUIP – Phase 2 June 2018 1 H:\EVT_Projects\16\1883 - Renton Downtown Utility Improvement\122 Phase II Scope Development\Old\20180626 Phase 2 DUIP SOW.docx EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF SERVICES DOWNTOWN UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT – PHASE 2: PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING AND DESIGN CITY OF RENTON Statement of Understanding Under the Agreement for the Downtown Utility Improvements Project, Phase 1 Conceptual Analysis & Design CAG-17-066 dated February 1, 2017 and Amendment No. 1 dated June 14, 2017 between the City of Renton (City) and Murraysmith, Inc. (Consultant), the Consultant developed design criteria, the basis of design, and the conceptual design for the water, sewer, and stormwater improvements. Amendment No. 2 extended the Time of Performance from January 31, 2018 to April 30, 2018. The improvements are necessary due to age and capacity need. This Phase 2 Preliminary Engineering and Design Scope of Services is based on our understanding of the desired Phase 2 work to advance the conceptual design developed in Phase 1 of the water, sewer, and stormwater improvements to a 50 percent design level for the identified Project Improvements. The Project Limits, illustrated and defined in Attachment A, include the cross streets and the South 2nd Street and South 3rd Street intersections at Rainier Avenue North, but do not include the Williams and Wells Avenues South and Rainier Avenue North areas being designed by KPG, P.S. The Preliminary Engineering and Design work includes: ▪ Clearly defined water, sewer, and stormwater improvements that will be the basis of the 90 percent and Bid Documents developed in a subsequent phase of the project. ▪ Topographic surveying and base map preparation performed by KPG, P.S. ▪ Potholing of existing utilities performed by LineScape of Washington, LLC ▪ Public information and outreach performed by EnviroIssues AGENDA ITEM #7. m) City of Renton MURRAYSMITH DUIP – PHASE 2 June 2018 2 H:\EVT_Projects\16\1883 - Renton Downtown Utility Improvement\122 Phase II Scope Development\Old\20180626 Phase 2 DUIP SOW.docx Scope of Services The Scope of Services tasks are further detailed via the following four components, where applicable: 1. Subtasks: specific project elements and efforts that will be completed by the Consultant 2. Consultant Deliverables: the finished product that will be delivered to the City via electronic and/or hard copy 3. City Responsibilities: tasks that will be completed and/or elements or information that will be provided by City staff 4. Assumptions: assumptions used to develop each task Task 101 - Project Management Provide for management of Phase 2 of the project and coordination with the project team. The following work elements are included in this task as specifically defined below. Subtasks: 101.1 Project Status Reporting – Report status of work activities, data needs and issues requiring City input through e-mails and phone calls to City Project Manager & Utility Project Managers. 101.2 Staff/Consultant Team Management – Manage project staff/consultant team to ensure services are in conformance with the Scope of Services, budget, and schedule. 101.3 Invoices and Budget Oversight – Monitor project costs and manage budget and billing tasks, including preparation and submission of monthly invoices and progress reports. 101.4 Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) –Manage and coordinate in-house quality assurance reviews of all deliverables. Consultant Deliverables: ▪ E-mail project status reports. ▪ Correspondence, e-mails and other documentation. ▪ Monthly invoices and progress reports. AGENDA ITEM #7. m) City of Renton MURRAYSMITH DUIP – PHASE 2 June 2018 3 H:\EVT_Projects\16\1883 - Renton Downtown Utility Improvement\122 Phase II Scope Development\Old\20180626 Phase 2 DUIP SOW.docx City Responsibilities: ▪ Review project status reports, invoices, and schedule and provide comments to Consultant. Assumptions: ▪ Anticipated notice to proceed is June 25, 2018. ▪ Complete design services according to the schedule contained in this Scope of Services. Task 102 - Project Meetings and Coordination Provide for project meetings and coordination with City staff. Correspondence with others including the City, other utilities, etc. will be performed via phone conversations and e-mail or meetings and include communication of project decisions, project progress and status, work activities, and issues requiring coordination for design of the City’s system improvements. The following work elements are included in this task as specifically defined below. Subtasks: 102.1 Phase 2 Kick-Off Meeting – Prepare for and conduct project kick-off meeting with City staff and key team members to discuss project, review project schedule and discuss key elements of the project. Prepare a meeting agenda and summary. 102.2 General Project Meetings/Coordination – Prepare for and conduct up to two (2) in person general project coordination meetings and up to two (2) GoTo Meetings or similar with City staff and key team members to discuss project, review project schedule and discuss key elements of the project. Prepare a meeting agenda and summary. 102.3 Water Utility Design Meetings/Coordination – Prepare for and conduct up to two (2) in person design coordination meetings and up to two (2) GoTo Meetings or similar with City water utility staff and key team members to discuss project, review project schedule and discuss key elements of the project. Prepare a meeting agenda and summary. Provide for project and design coordination with City water utility personnel. All communication will be coordinated through the City Water Utility Project Manager. Correspondence with the City Water Utility Project Manager via phone conversations and e-mail will include the communication of project decisions, project status, work activities, and issues requiring City input. 102.4 Sewer Utility Design Meetings/Coordination – Prepare for and conduct up to two (2) in person design coordination meetings and up to two (2) GoTo Meetings or similar with City sewer utility staff and key team members to discuss project, review project schedule and discuss key elements of the project. Prepare a meeting agenda and summary. AGENDA ITEM #7. m) City of Renton MURRAYSMITH DUIP – PHASE 2 June 2018 4 H:\EVT_Projects\16\1883 - Renton Downtown Utility Improvement\122 Phase II Scope Development\Old\20180626 Phase 2 DUIP SOW.docx Provide for project and design coordination with City sewer utility personnel. All communication will be coordinated through the City Sewer Utility Project Manager. Correspondence with the City Sewer Utility Project Manager via phone conversations and e-mail will include the communication of project decisions, project status, work activities, and issues requiring City input. 102.5 Surface Water Utility Design Meetings/Coordination – Prepare for and conduct up to two (2) in person design coordination meetings and up to two (2) GoTo Meetings or similar with City surface water utility staff and key team members to discuss project, review project schedule and discuss key elements of the project. Prepare a meeting agenda and summary. Provide for project and design coordination with City surface water utility personnel. All communication will be coordinated through the City Surface Water Utility Project Manager. Correspondence with the City Surface Water Utility Project Manager via phone conversations and e-mail will include the communication of project decisions, project status, work activities, and issues requiring City input. 102.6 Concurrent City Projects Coordination – Provide up to 40 hours of coordination with the City’s Roadway Design Consultant and the City regarding the Rainier Avenue Street Improvements Project and the Williams and Wells Intersection Improvements Project. 102.7 City Departments Correspondence and Coordination – Provide up to 40 hours of coordination with various City departments (e.g. transportation, maintenance division, and Community & Economic Development) with interest in the project. 40 hours are budgeted for this task. 102.8 Franchise Utilities Coordination – Provide up to 40 hours of coordination with franchise utilities (e.g. Seattle City Light, Puget Sound Energy, Comcast Cable, Century Link, and Frontier Communications NW) with facilities within the vicinity of the project. Contact appropriate utilities to confirm presence or absence of facilities in the project corridor and obtain pertinent information and record drawings. 102.9 Seattle Public Utilities (SPU) and King County Coordination – Provide up to 40 hours of coordination with SPU and King County regarding the Cedar River Pipelines and Eastside Interceptor, respectively. Consultant Deliverables: ▪ E-mail summaries of coordination discussions. City Responsibilities: ▪ Coordinate with design team and attend meetings as appropriate and required. AGENDA ITEM #7. m) City of Renton MURRAYSMITH DUIP – PHASE 2 June 2018 5 H:\EVT_Projects\16\1883 - Renton Downtown Utility Improvement\122 Phase II Scope Development\Old\20180626 Phase 2 DUIP SOW.docx Assumptions: ▪ One (1) kick-off meeting will be attended by up to two (2) Consultant team members. ▪ The above referenced general project meetings are anticipated to be held jointly with City water, sewer, and surface water utility staff to facilitate coordination of Phase 2. ▪ The above identified number of general project and individual utility design coordination meetings (either in person at City or other office or remotely via GoTo Meeting or similar) with the City and/or others will be attended by up to two (2) Consultant team members. Task 201 – Field Survey & Base Map Development Provide topographic surveying and base map preparation for the Project Limits illustrated and defined in Attachment A. Within the project limits, KPG, P.S. has recently mapped portions for use in other projects, including portions of Rainier Ave S, S 2nd Street, S 3rd Street, Williams Avenue S, Wells Avenue S, Main Avenue S, and Houser Way S. The mapping for this task consists of approximately 9,100 lineal feet of roadway within the Right of Way corridor. The following work elements are included in this task as specifically defined below and in the subconsultant’s proposal included as Attachment B – KPG, P.S. Proposal. 201.1 Coordination with KPG, P.S. – Coordinate survey work with KPG. 201.2 Coordination with City – Coordinate with City regarding City review and verification for accuracy and completeness of existing utility systems. Consultant Deliverables: ▪ A survey base map of the project area in AutoCAD Civil 3D format of the project to Murraysmith CADD standards. The scale of the survey drawing shall be 1-inch = 20-feet. Base map to include information collected as described above and incorporate the prior mapped areas to create one composite base map. City Responsibilities: ▪ Review and provide comments on base map for accuracy and completeness relative to existing utility systems information. Assumptions: ▪ Base map will be updated based on City review and verification for accuracy and completeness of existing utility systems. ▪ Included in this task are: signal loops, utility locate paint marks, surface features (valves, manholes, catch basins, junction boxes, vaults, etc.). AGENDA ITEM #7. m) City of Renton MURRAYSMITH DUIP – PHASE 2 June 2018 6 H:\EVT_Projects\16\1883 - Renton Downtown Utility Improvement\122 Phase II Scope Development\Old\20180626 Phase 2 DUIP SOW.docx ▪ Irrigation systems will not be included. ▪ If required, Traffic Control Services Inc. will be hired to provide traffic control plans and traffic control. Two days of traffic control is allocated, including plans preparation, flagging personnel, all required trucks and equipment and uniformed officer for one day. Task 202 – Potholing Perform potholing for up to 100 locations. The following work elements are included in this task as specifically defined below and in the subconsultant’s proposal included as Attachment C – LineScape of Washington, LLC Proposal. 202.1 Coordination with LineScape of Washington, LLC – Coordinate with potholing subconsultant. Consultant Deliverables: ▪ Provide PDF file with pictures for all potholes and an Excel spreadsheet showing location of all potholed utilities, description and size of utilities, material type, depth of utilities measured from existing grade to top and to bottom of utilities or actual elevations, direction of utilities, thickness of existing asphalt or concrete roadway, type of soils encountered at various depth. City Responsibilities: ▪ Assist with coordination with King County Metro, if required, for work near the Bus Depot. Assumptions: ▪ Pricing is for Non-Prevailing Wage. If project deemed to require state Prevailing Wage rates, additional cost-plus administration fees will need to be added. ▪ LineScape to use EZStreet for the restoration related to their potholing. Task 300 – Horizontal Alignment Analysis & Preliminary (30 percent) Layout Develop horizontal piping alignments for each of the water, sewer, and stormwater utility system improvements to a 30 percent design level. ▪ Horizontal Alignment Analysis and Preliminary Layouts – Perform horizontal alignment analysis and develop preliminary (30 percent) layouts for each of the individual utility system improvements utilizing the base mapping topographic and existing utility information developed in Task 201 along with other project information developed in the previous tasks and Phase 1 – Conceptual Design. Preliminary design drawings will be AGENDA ITEM #7. m) City of Renton MURRAYSMITH DUIP – PHASE 2 June 2018 7 H:\EVT_Projects\16\1883 - Renton Downtown Utility Improvement\122 Phase II Scope Development\Old\20180626 Phase 2 DUIP SOW.docx prepared to a 30 percent design completion level, showing plan views and major project elements only. ▪ Conflict Analysis – Perform a conflict analysis to determine the location of the potholing work to be performed in Task 202. ▪ Existing Utilities Condition Assessments Coordination/Inclusion – Coordinate with the City regarding the City performed existing utilities condition assessments. ▪ Separation Requirements – Determine location where the 10-foot horizontal separation between water, sewer, and stormwater utilities cannot be maintained, and determine methods to mitigate the reduced spacing that meet regulatory requirements. ▪ Horizontal Alignment Analysis Documentation – Prepare a brief technical memorandum documenting the analysis and basis used to develop 30 percent horizontal piping alignment for the water, sewer, and stormwater piping improvements, including construction constraints. ▪ Engineer’s Opinion of Probable Construction Cost (OPCC) – Prepare an AACE International Class 3 OPCC with an expected accuracy range of -20 percent to +30 percent. The following individual tasks are further defined below. Task 301 – Water System Improvements (30%) Prepare draft horizontal piping alignments and perform other related efforts described under Task 300 above to 30 percent level for the water utility system improvements, including the mains only. Include a preliminary profile layout of the portion of the new 12 -inch diameter water main in Whitworth Ave S that will cross under SPU's pipelines. Tie-ins to existing infrastructure, hydrants, and service connections to be designed under Task 400. Task 302 – Sewer System Improvements (30%) Prepare draft horizontal piping alignments to 30 percent level and perform other related efforts described under Task 300 above for the sewer utility system improvements, including mains and interceptors only. Tie-ins to existing infrastructure and service laterals to be designed under Task 400. Task 303 – Surface Water System Improvements (30%) Prepare draft horizontal piping alignments to 30 percent level and perform other related efforts described under Task 300 above for the stormwater utility system improvements, including trunk conveyance lines only. Surface collection and connections to trunk lines to be designed in future project phase. AGENDA ITEM #7. m) City of Renton MURRAYSMITH DUIP – PHASE 2 June 2018 8 H:\EVT_Projects\16\1883 - Renton Downtown Utility Improvement\122 Phase II Scope Development\Old\20180626 Phase 2 DUIP SOW.docx Consultant Deliverables ▪ 30 percent level horizontal piping alignment half-size (11x17) drawings for the water, sewer, and stormwater utility system improvements, technical memorandum documenting the analysis and basis for the 30 percent design, and OPCC in electronic format (PDF) for review and comment. City Responsibilities: ▪ Complete review of existing utilities condition assessments and provide relevant information and input as it relates to the existing utilities requiring replacement to be incorporated into the project improvements. ▪ Complete review of the horizontal piping alignments, technical memorandum, and OPCC for the project utility system improvements and provide one compiled written set of comments. Assumptions: ▪ Sewer interceptor modeling and sizing determination/verification will be provided by the City’s hydraulic modeling consultant. ▪ For the 30 percent level horizontal alignment drawings, only the plan views are included for the sewer and stormwater drawings. Water plans to include a profile plan on the same plan sheets showing the existing grade of the streets. A breakdown of the number of sheets for each of the individual utilities for the Task 300 work is as follows: - Water System – 7 sheets - Sewer System – 10 sheets - Stormwater System – 10 sheets ▪ Drawings will be developed at 1-inch = 20-feet scale in AutoCAD electronic format. ▪ City review period is assumed to be 10 working days. ▪ Only one (1) set of review comments will be received from the City. Task 400 – Preliminary (50 percent) Design Develop preliminary plan and profile drawings to the approximately 50 percent design completion level as described below. AGENDA ITEM #7. m) City of Renton MURRAYSMITH DUIP – PHASE 2 June 2018 9 H:\EVT_Projects\16\1883 - Renton Downtown Utility Improvement\122 Phase II Scope Development\Old\20180626 Phase 2 DUIP SOW.docx ▪ General Drawings (50 percent design completion level) – Prepare preliminary design general sheets to a 50 percent design completion level, using the project information developed in the previous tasks and Phase 1 – Conceptual Design. ▪ Utility Plan & Profile Drawings (50 percent design completion level) – Prepare preliminary design drawings to a 50 percent design completion level, showing plan and profile views and major project elements, using the project information developed in the previous tasks and Phase 1 – Conceptual Design. Drawings will be developed at 1-inch = 20-feet scale in AutoCAD electronic format. Applicable City Standard Details will be identified and summarized as appropriate for the project. ▪ Specifications Outline – Prepare a preliminary specifications outline listing the anticipated specifications to be used in the project. Specifications will be developed using the City’s Standard Specifications along with the 2018 WSDOT Standard Specifications. ▪ Engineer’s Opinion of Probable Construction Cost – Prepare an AACE International Class 2 Opinion of Probable Construction Cost with an expected accuracy range of -15 percent to +20 percent. ▪ Project Schedule Update – Develop and updated project schedule including consideration of project phasing and implementation. The following individual tasks are further defined below. Task 401 – Water System Improvements (50%) Prepare water utility system improvements design drawings to a 50 percent design completion level, including tie-ins to existing infrastructure, hydrants, and service connections and perform other related efforts described under Task 400 above. Task 402 – Sewer System Improvements (50%) Prepare sewer utility system improvements preliminary design drawings to a 50 percent design completion level and perform other related efforts described under Task 400 above for the sewer utility system improvements, including tie-ins to existing infrastructure and service laterals. Task 403 – Surface Water System Improvements (50%) Prepare stormwater utility system improvements preliminary design drawings to a 50 percent design completion level, including surface collection and connections to trunk lines to be designed in future project phase. and perform other related efforts described under Task 400 above for the stormwater utility system improvements. AGENDA ITEM #7. m) City of Renton MURRAYSMITH DUIP – PHASE 2 June 2018 10 H:\EVT_Projects\16\1883 - Renton Downtown Utility Improvement\122 Phase II Scope Development\Old\20180626 Phase 2 DUIP SOW.docx Denote any additional repairs or replacement needed based on condition assessment conducted through TV inspection by the City’s Surface Water Maintenance Division. Work on this task requires prior authorization from the Surface Water Utility. Consultant Deliverables: ▪ 50 percent preliminary plans per the Preliminary Drawing List, half size (11x17), in electronic format (PDF) for review and comment. ▪ Specifications Outline. ▪ OPCC in electronic format (PDF) for review and comment. ▪ Update project schedule City Responsibilities: ▪ Complete review of the preliminary design drawings, specifications outline, and Engineer’s Opinion of Probable Construction Cost with one compiled written set of comments. ▪ Conduct TV inspection of all pipes in the project that do not require upsizing. ▪ Provide markups of the extents of repairs needed. Assumptions: ▪ Preliminary design drawings will include general and plan and profile drawings only (as identified in the attached Preliminary Drawing List) to a 50 percent level design. Details will not be prepared. ▪ Preliminary design does not include the following: demolition, traffic control, and restoration. ▪ A single (1) plan set and OPCC will be developed under this task. ▪ City review period is assumed to be 10 working days. ▪ Only one (1) set of review comments using Bluebeam review format will be received from the City. ▪ Contract (Front End) Documents and Technical Specifications will not be prepared as part of the preliminary design efforts. ▪ City to provide condition assessment information on existing water, sewer, and stormwater utilities within 15 days of notice to proceed. Repairs determined from condition assessment information to generally be designated on plans and/or profiles through construction notes. Details (such for adapters or connectors) may also be needed. AGENDA ITEM #7. m) City of Renton MURRAYSMITH DUIP – PHASE 2 June 2018 11 H:\EVT_Projects\16\1883 - Renton Downtown Utility Improvement\122 Phase II Scope Development\Old\20180626 Phase 2 DUIP SOW.docx ▪ Roadway drainage and conveyance piping is included. Roadway drainage system based on assumptions and/or information provided by the City regarding future roadway conditions. ▪ No water quality facilities are included in design. ▪ TIR to be developed in Phase 3. Task 501 – Public Involvement Provide public information and outreach assistance as requested by the City during Phase 2 of the project. The following work elements are included in this task as specifically defined below and in the subconsultant’s proposal as Attachment D – EnviroIssues Proposal. Subtasks: 501.1 Coordination with EnviroIssues – Coordinate public involvement work with EnviroIssues and the City, including development of the stakeholder list, website content, fact sheet, and outreach graphics. Consultant Deliverable(s): ▪ Project stakeholder list, website content, fact sheet, outreach graphics, and meeting summaries City Responsibilities: ▪ Provide project area research and information necessary for project stakeholder list ▪ Coordination of meetings for downtown business and residents ▪ Coordination of City public event ▪ City webmaster will format and populate the project website with content and graphic provided by Consultant and EnviroIssues. ▪ Reproduction and distribution of project materials. Assumption(s): ▪ Participation in meetings and public events is limited to those defined under this task. Task 601 – Phase 3 – Final Design Scope Development Prepare for and meet with City personnel to review and discuss the desired/required subsequent phase (Phase 3) for final design work in support of the project’s continued development, desired AGENDA ITEM #7. m) City of Renton MURRAYSMITH DUIP – PHASE 2 June 2018 12 H:\EVT_Projects\16\1883 - Renton Downtown Utility Improvement\122 Phase II Scope Development\Old\20180626 Phase 2 DUIP SOW.docx consultant assistance, as well as to develop/verify/refine a scope of work and budget for the project. Subtasks: 601.1 Phase 3 Scoping – Prepare for and meet with the City to develop Phase 3 (Final Design) requirements. Develop Draft Phase 3 Scope of Services and budget for City review. Incorporate City comments on Draft Scope of Services and budget and submit Final Phase 3 Scope of Services and budget. Consultant Deliverable(s): ▪ Phase 3 Scope of Services and budget, draft and final City Responsibilities: ▪ Review and provide comments on the Draft Scope of Services and budget Assumption(s): ▪ None Schedule Work will begin upon receipt of a signed contract amendment and notice to proceed, or other agreeable written authorization. We will begin our work and proceed in a timely manner with an anticipated completion of Phase 2 of the project by no later than March 31, 2019, assuming notice to proceed is given by the end of July 2018. This schedule is based on timely input and information from City staff and others including the collection of requisite information and documentation, staff input, and feedback regarding draft document(s) or other project matters. AGENDA ITEM #7. m) City of Renton MURRAYSMITH DUIP – PHASE 2 June 2018 13 H:\EVT_Projects\16\1883 - Renton Downtown Utility Improvement\122 Phase II Scope Development\Old\20180626 Phase 2 DUIP SOW.docx Preliminary Drawing List Sheets Drawing Name 1 G-1 Cover, Title Sheet, Vicinity Map, and Index of Drawings 2 G-2 Symbols, Legend, Abbreviations and Designations 3-4 G-3, G-4 General Notes 5 G-5 Survey Control Plan and Notes 6-7 G-6 – G-7 TESC Plan and Notes 8-10 G-8 – G-10 Water, Sewer, & Stormwater Improvements, Key Maps 11-12 G-11 – G-12 Potholing Tables 13-19 W-1 – W-7 Water Plan & Profile (400 feet per sheet) 20-21 W-8 – W-9 Water Details (NOT INCLUDED IN THIS SCOPE OF SERVICES) 22-35 SS-1 – SS-14 Sewer Plan & Profile (450 feet per sheet) 36-40 SS-15 – SS-19 Sewer Details (NOT INCLUDED IN THIS SCOPE OF SERVICES) 41-52 SW-1 – SW-12 Stormwater Conveyance Plan & Profile (450 feet per sheet) 53-56 SW-13 – SW-16 Stormwater Collection Profiles (6 per sheet) and Stormwater Details (STORMWATER DETAILS ARE NOT INCLUDED IN THIS SCOPE OF SERVICES) Attachments: ▪ A – Project Limits ▪ B – KPG, P.S. Proposal (dated 6/20/2018) ▪ C – LineScape of Washington, LLC Proposal (dated 3/09/2018) ▪ D – EnviroIssues Proposal (dated 5/31/2018) AGENDA ITEM #7. m) %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%!!2 !!2 "" """" "" "" ""!!2 !!2 ""!!2 "" "" "" !!2 "" !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2"" !!2 "" "" "" !!2 "" """" "" "" "" !!2 !!2 !!2!!2 "" "" "" !!2 !!2 "" !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 "" "" "" !!2 !!2 "" "" "" !!2 "" "" "" "" !!2 !!2 !!2 ""!!2 !!2 "" "" !!2 "" "" !!2 !!2 "" !!2 "" "" """" """" "" !!2 "" !!2 """" "" "" "" !!2 !!2 "" !!2""!!2 "" """" !!2 !!2 "" "" !!2!!2 "" !!2 "" !!2"" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" !!2 !!2 "" "" "" !!2 ""!!2 "" "" "" !!2 "" !!2 !!2 "" !!2 "" !!2 !!2 "" !!2"" !!2 "" "" !!2 "" !!2 "" "" "" "" "" "" ""!!2!!2 !!2 "" !!2 """" "" "" "" !!2 "" !!2 !!2 !!2 "" "" !!2 "" !!2 "" !!2"" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" !!2 !!2 !!2 "" "" "" !!2 "" !!2 "" "" ""!!2 "" "" !!2 "" "" ""!!2 "" !!2 !!2 !!2"" "" "" "" "" """" "" "" "" "" !!2 "" "" !!2 "" !!2 ""!!2 !!2 !!2 "" !!2 "" !!2 "" "" "" !!2 !!2 "" "" "" "" !!2 "" "" "" !!2 !!2 """"!!2 !!2 "" !!2 !!2 !!2 """" "" !!2 "" !!2 "" "" !!2 "" !!2 "" "" "" "" "" "" "" !!2 "" !!2 !!2!!2 "" "" "" "" "" "" "" !!2 !!2 "" "" "" !!2"" "" "" !!2 "" "" "" !!2 !!2 !!2 "" "" !!2 "" "" "" "" "" "" !!2"" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" !!2 "" "" !!2!!2 "" !!2 "" """" !!2 "" "" "" "" "" !!2 "" !!2 "" !!2 "" !!2 !!2 "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" !!2 "" "" !!2 "" !!2 "" "" !!2 !!2 !!2 "" "" "" "" !!2 "" "" !!2 "" "" !!2 "" "" !!2 !!2 "" "" "" !!2 !!2 !!2 "" "" "" "" !!2 !!2 !!2 "" ""!!2 "" "" "" "" ""!!2 !!2 "" "" "" "" "" !!2 "" !!2 "" "" !!2 !!2 "" "" !!2"" !!2 "" "" !!2 "" !!2 "" "" "" "" "" !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" ""!!2 "" "" !!2 "" !!2"" !!2 "" "" !!2 !!2 "" "" !!2 "" !!2 "" "" "" "" "" "" "" !!2 "" !!2 !!2 !!2 "" "" !!2 "" !!2 "" "" """" "" "" !!2 "" "" !!2 "" !!2 "" "" !!2 "" "" "" "" !!2 !!2 "" "" "" "" !!2 "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" !!2 "" "" "" "" "" "" "" """" "" "" !!2"" !!2 !!2 "" "" !!2 !!2 !!2 "" !!2 "" ""!!2 "" "" "" "" "" !!2 "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" !!2 "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" !!2 "" "" "" "" !!2 "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" !!2 "" "" "" "" "" "" "" !!2 "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" !!2 """" "" "" !!2 "" "" "" !!2 "" !!2 "" "" !!2 "" "" !!2 "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" """" !!2 "" "" "" "" "" "" "" !!2 "" "" "" !!2 "" "" """" !!2 "" "" "" !!2 "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" !!2 "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" !!2 !!2!!2 !!2 "" !!2 !!2 !!2 "" "" !!2 "" !!2 !!2 !!2 "" !!2 !!2 "" !!2 !!2!!2 "" !!2!!2 "" "" !!2 "" "" "" "" "" !!2 "" "" "" "" "" !!2 "" "" "" "" !!2 "" !!2 "" "" !!2 !!2 !!2 "" !!2 "" "" !!2 !!2 "" "" !!2 "" "" "" !!2 "" !!2 !!2 "" "" !!2 "" !!2 "" "" !!2 "" "" "" "" !!2 !!2 !!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 "" "" "" !!2 "" "" "" "" !!2 "" !!2 "" "" "" !!2 !!2 !!2 "" !!2 "" !!2"" !!2"" !!2 "" !!2 "" ""!!2 !!2 "" "" !!2 !!2 "" "" "" !!2 ""!!2 !!2 "" !!2 !!2 "" "" "" !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 "" !!2 "" !!2 !!2 "" !!2 !!2 !!2 "" "" !!2 "" "" "" "" "" !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 "" "" !!2 "" "" !!2 "" !!2 !!2 """" !!2 !!2 "" !!2 "" !!2 "" !!2 !!2 !!2 "" !!2 "" "" !!2 "" "" "" !!2 "" !!2 "" !!2 !!2 "" "" !!2 "" !!2 !!2 "" "" !!2"" """" !!2 !!2 "" "" "" "" "" !!2 "" "" !!2 !!2 !!2 "" "" "" "" "" "" "" !!2 !!2 !!2 "" "" "" "" !!2 "" "" "" !!2 "" "" "" !!2 "" !!2 "" ""!!2 "" "" "" "" "" "" "" """" "" !!2 "" "" "" !!2 "" "" "" !!2 !!2 "" "" !!2 !!2 "" "" "" !!2 "" "" "" !!2 !!2 "" "" "" "" !!2 !!2 "" "" !!2 !!2 """" "" """" """""" "" !!2 !!2 "" "" "" "" "" "" !!2 !!2 "" "" "" "" !!2 !!2 "" !!2 !!2 "" !!2 "" !!2 "" "" !!2 "" "" """" !!2 """""" !!2 "" "" "" "" !!2 "" "" !!2 "" "" !!2 "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" !!2 "" "" "" "" "" !!2 ""!!2 """" "" """" "" "" "" "" "" !!2 !!2 "" !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 "" "" !!2 "" "" "" "" "" "" "" """" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" !!2 "" "" "" "" !!2 "" !!2 "" "" "" !!2 "" "" "" """" "" "" "" """" "" !!2 "" !!2 "" "" "" "" "" !!2 !!2 "" "" "" "" "" "" "" """" "" "" "" !!2 "" "" "" "" !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 "" "" !!2 "" !!2 "" "" """" "" "" "" !!2 "" "" !!2 "" !!2 "" "" !!2 "" "" "" !!2 "" "" !!2 !!2 !!2 "" "" !!2 """" "" "" "" !!2 "" !!2 "" "" "" "" !!2 "" "" !!2 "" "" !!2 !!2 !!2 """" """" "" "" "" !!2 !!2 !!2 "" !!2 "" !!2 "" "" "" "" !!2 !!2 "" "" !!2 !!2!!2 """" """" !!2 !!2 !!2 "" "" """" """" !!2 "" ""!!2!!2 !!2 !!2 "" !!2!!2 !!2 """" """" """"""!!2 "" !!2!!2 "" !!2"" !!2!!2 !!2!!2 "" """" """""""" !!2 !!2 """" "" "" !!2!!2 "" !!2 "" "" "" !!2 "" "" "" !!2 !!2"" !!2 !!2 "" ""!!2 "" !!2 "" """" "" "" "" "" !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 "" !!2 """" !!2 !!2!!2 G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!.G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!.G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!.G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!.G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!.G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!.G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!.G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!.G!. G!. G!. G!.G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!.G!. G!. G!.G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!.G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!.G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!.G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!.G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!.G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. $¬+ $¬+ $¬+ $¬+ $¬+ $¬+ $¬+ $¬+ $¬+ $¬+ $¬+ $¬+ $¬+ $¬+ $¬+ $¬+ $¬+ $¬+ $¬+ $¬+$¬+ $¬+ $¬+ $¬+ $¬+ $¬+ $¬+ $¬+ $¬+ $¬+ $¬+ $¬+ $¬+ $¬+ $¬+ $¬+ $¬+ $¬+ $¬+ $¬+ $¬+ $¬+ $¬+ $¬+ $¬+ &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2&S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2&S2 &S2&S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2&S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2&S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2&S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2&S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2&S2&S2&S2&S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2&S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2&S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2&S2&S2&S2 &S2&S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2&S2 &S2 &S2 &S2&S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2&S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2&S2&S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2&S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2&S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2&S2 &S2 &S2 &S2&S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2&S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2&S2 &S2 &S2 &S2&S2&S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2&S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2&S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2&S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2&S2&S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2&S2 &S2&S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2&S2&S2 &S2 &S2 &S2&S2&S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2&S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2&S2 &S2 &S2&S2&S2&S2 &S2 &S2 &S2&S2 &S2 &S2&S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2&S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2&S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2&S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 &S2 S 3rd St S 2nd StS 2nd StS 134th St S 3rd St Main Ave SLogan Ave SBurnettAve SMill Ave SBronson Way SMain Ave SShattuck Ave SE P e r im e te r R d Smithers Ave SS Tobin St S 4th StShattuckAve SLindAve NWWilliams Ave SWhitworthAve SI-405 FWYHouser W ay SLake Ave SWilliams Ave NRai ni er Av e SMorris Ave SS 3 r d P l Wells Ave SWhitworthAve SRainier Ave NCedar Ave SAccess RdAirport Way S Tillicum St Burnett Pl SRentonHS AcRdI-405 FWYW Perimeter Rd 6 6'' S P U C R P L # 3 66'' SPU CRPL #1 55.5'' SPU CRPL #2 108'' KC EASTSIDE INTERCEPTOR108'' KC EASTSI DE I NTERCEPTORH:\EVT_Projects\16\1883 - Renton Downtown Utility Improvement\CAD\GIS\Conceptual Design\Contract Project Limits.mxd 6/5/2018 9:32:32 AM Spencer.OgdenC i t y o f R e n t o n D U I PWater, S e w e r , a n dStormwater I m p r o v e m e n t s C o n t r a c t P r o j e c t L i m i t sDRAFT© EXISTING UTILITY SYSTEMS & BASE DATA: CITY OF RENTON 2017, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. KING COUNTY INTERCEPTOR DATA: KING COUNTY 2017. DATA SOURCE SUPPLIED MAY NOT REFLECT CURRENT OR ACTUAL CONDITIONS. THIS MAP IS A GEOGRAPHIC REPRESENTATION BASED ON INFORMATION AVAILABLE. IT DOES NOT REPRESENT SURVEY DATA.NO WARRANTY IS MADE CONCERNING THE ACCURACY, CURRENCY, OR COMPLETENESS OF DATA DEPICTED ON THIS MAP. Proposed Utilities Stormwater Main Water Main Sewer Main Stormwater Main Water Main &S2 Manhole $¬+Clean Out G!.Hydrant ""Catch Basin - Type 1 !!2 Catch Basin - Type 2 SPU Cedar RiverPipeline %KC EastsideInterceptor Existing Utilities Existing StructuresSewer Main (2A) 0 250 500125 Scale in Feet ATTACHMENT A - PROJECT LIMITS Survey limits to 5' beyond ROW; at intersections, survey limits go 50' beyond adjacent ROW Project limits including cross streets between S 2nd St and S 3rd St from Rainier Ave S to Mill Ave S, and Shattuck Ave S from S 3rd St to Houser Way S KPG project extents not to be included in Murraysmith DUIP work KPG project extents not to be included in Murraysmith DUIP work AGENDA ITEM #7. m) KPG Phase 2 Survey Base Map (6/20/18) Project Limits The Project Limits are within the public rights of way. The Project Limits for the purpose of this task is: Rainier Avenue S (western boundary), Mills Avenue S (eastern boundary), S 2nd Street (northern boundary), and S 3rd Street (southern boundary). Together with Shattuck Avenue S from S 3rd Street to Houser Way S. The Project Limits is outlined in a figure dated March 2nd, 2018 entitled “Figure 1 Water Study Area”. Mapping shall extend five (5) feet beyond road rights-of-way. On cross streets mapping shall extend fifty (50) feet from the edge of right-of-way. The diagonal SPU right of way is excluded from the Project Limits except where it crosses City right of way. Within the Project Limits, the Survey Consultant has recently mapped portions for use in other projects. These include portions of Rainier Ave S, S 2nd Street, S 3rd Street, Williams Avenue S, Wells Avenue S, Main Avenue S, and Houser Way S. New mapping will consist of approximately 9,100 lineal feet. Field survey of planimetric features and utilities. Topographic mapping of the existing ground will be taken at approximately at 25-ft intervals (to 1-ft. contour intervals). The streets will have complete survey out to approximately five (5) feet behind the right-of-way. Included in this task are: signal loops, utility locate paint marks, surface features (valves, manholes, catch basins, junction boxes, vaults, trees, curbs, planters, driveways, etc.). Irrigation systems will not be included. Perform observation and measure-downs of existing storm drain catch basins and manholes and sewer manholes. The approximate size, type (brick, concrete), and approximate size and location of pipes will be documented. These observations will be made from the surface. Geotechnical borings and utility potholes shall be surveyed as needed. Finished floor elevations shall be obtained for commercial and residential buildings within the mapping limits. The Consultant shall coordinate utility locates, identification, survey, and other work, as necessary, to locate franchise underground utilities in order to identify any potential conflicts with the proposed improvements. Consultant shall subcontract with a utility locating company to paint utility locations within the project limits so that they can be surveyed. The Consultant shall coordinate with David Christensen and Gregg Seegmiller, City of Renton, to request locates for City-owned utilities. Consultant will request utility companies record drawings and update utility mapping. Consultant shall conduct CADD mapping work to prepare 1”=20’ topographic base map and digital terrain model (DTM) in AutoCAD format of the project within the limits described above. Right-of-way will be determined from available survey records (surveys, right-of-way plans, etc.). Parcel lines will utilize available GIS linework and will only be approximate. Supplemental Services A provisional budget allowance not to exceed $10,000 is included in anticipation of supplemental survey AGENDA ITEM #7. m) services which may be requested during the design phase of the project. Deliverables: A survey base map in AutoCAD Civil 3D format of the project to KPG Murraysmith or City of Renton cad standards. The scale of the survey drawing shall be as specified by the Engineer. The base map will include information collected as described above and will also incorporate the prior mapped areas to create one composite base map. Assumptions: If required, Traffic Control Services Inc. will be hired to provide traffic control plans and traffic control. Two days of traffic control is allocated, including plans preparation, flagging personnel, all required trucks and equipment and uniformed officer for one day. AGENDA ITEM #7. m) Murraysmith, Inc. Renton Downtown Utility Improvements Project Phase 2 - Topographic and Utility Mapping 6/20/2018 Hours Rate Amount Task 1 Topographic and Utility Mapping Topo mapping 220.00 $165.00 $36,300.00 Utility mapping 80.00 $165.00 $13,200.00 Basemap preparation 290.00 $112.00 $32,480.00 Utility and ROW research and coordination 80.00 $137.00 $10,960.00 Supplemental Services $10,000.00 Sub-Total Mapping $102,940.00 Expenses Utility locates $25,000.00 Traffic control $2,000.00 Mileage $1,400.00 Sub-Total Expenses $28,400.00 Total $131,340.00 KPG AGENDA ITEM #7. m) AGENDA ITEM #7. m) Date 3/9/2018 **All estimates good for one month** Budget Proposal for: City of Renton DUIP Project - Non PW Customer Job Site Location Contact City of Renton DUIP Project Phone Email Address City, State, Zip Scope of Work to be Performed Qty Unit Unit Price Subtotal 100 HR $1,630.00 $163,000.00 10%Sales Tax $16,300.00 BID TOTAL: Qty Unit Unit Price Subtotal 100 HR $1,196.00 $119,600.00 10%Sales Tax $11,960.00 BID TOTAL: If you have any questions please feel free to contact me. Thank you, Kemp Garcia Please sign below and email back to accept and schedule work. Signature Date Jim Walton J Morrow 206-920-0013 Kemp Garcia 206-920-3722 MurraySmith Adam Schuyler Below is a per pothole price for up to 100 requested potholes at the unit price below depending on if a UPO is required. Pricing includes white lining/ 811 call for locates, crew and equipment to perform the pothole work. Pricing includes cost for Traffic Control, and Flagging. Backfill and Surface Restoration of 5/8" minus and cold patch. Backfill will be imported and soil that is pulled out of the hole during the vac excavation process. Deliverable will be in a spreadsheet, Bluebeam file with pictures. Pricing is for Non-Prevailing Wage. If project deemed Prevailing Wage, additional cost plus admin fees will be added. adam.schuyler@murraysmith.us Notice of Liability The use of high pressure jetting has inherent risks. Any damage to property, systems and loss of equipment will be the customer's responsibility. Linescape will not guarentee that high pressure jetting will solve the problems that exist in a system. Linescape employees will not jet lines that are not identified by know structures or identified by a camera. Linescape will not jet into the public main line without a city provided as-built. Payment due upon completion of work. All past due balances will be billed a monthly finance charge of 1% (12% APR). Service Per Pothole Price (UPO Not Included) $131,560.00 LineScape to provide: Service Per Pothole Price (UPO included) $179,300.00 Kemp@linescapellc.com Business Development - Vactor Jim@linescapellc.com Owner 206-794-9823 Jmorrow@linescapellc.com Project Manager - Drilling (206) 794-6040 PO Box 81243 | Seattle WA 98108 Page 1 of 1 ATTACHMENT C - LINESCAPE PROPOSAL AGENDA ITEM #7. m) Renton Downtown Utility Improvements Project May 31, 2018 Public Outreach Scope – EnviroIssues Page 1 Renton Downtown Utility Improvements Project - Phase 2 Scope of Services, May 31, 2018 Project Overview and Background In general, this work is intended to evaluate the existing water, sewer, and stormwater utility systems including identifying deficiencies, determining alternatives (if applicable), developing a conceptual design and making recommendations for system improvements to be implemented to address the future developed condition within the defined study area of downtown Renton. The Project Limits focuses on S 2nd Street and S 3rd Street and varies as defined per the following: • Water System – Rainier Avenue S (western boundary), Mills Avenue S (eastern boundary), S 2nd Street (northern boundary), Houser Way S (southern boundary). • Sewer System – Rainier Avenue S (western boundary), Mills Avenue S (eastern boundary), S 2nd Street (northern boundary), and S 3rd Street (southern boundary). • Stormwater System – Shattuck Ave S (western boundary), Mills Avenue S (eastern boundary), S 2nd Street (northern boundary), and Houser Way S (southern boundary). Replacing, rehabilitating, and/or upsizing the individual utilities are anticipated due to age, capacity needs, condition and/or maintenance requirements. S 2nd Street and S 3rd Street are major arterial roadways located within the City’s Center Downtown area and are lined by a variety of commercial businesses, Renton High School, and numerous other mixed use properties and contain several other utilities, both public and private. Phase 2 Duration The second phase of this project is expected to last approximately 6 months, from June 25 through December 31, 2018. Task 1 Public Information and Outreach Purpose: Provide public information and outreach assistance as requested by the City during Phase 2 of the project. • Prepare Project Stakeholder List: Based on project area research and information provided by the City, prepare a project stakeholder list and recommended contact methods. • Develop Project Information Material: Develop and design public information materials, which could include: o Website content: Prepare content for a project webpage that includes background information and links to key materials (e.g., project fact sheet). Consultant will coordinate with the City’s webmaster who will manage the webpage. o Project fact sheet: Prepare fact sheet with project overview, schedule, anticipated fieldwork details, and project contact information to post on the website and to share electronically, by mail, and at in-person events and meetings. ATTACHMENT D - ENVIROISSUES PROPOSAL AGENDA ITEM #7. m) Renton Downtown Utility Improvements Project May 31, 2018 Public Outreach Scope – EnviroIssues Page 2 • Provide Community Outreach Support: Attend existing area meetings and provide community feedback summaries. Events could include: o Attending up to two (2) downtown business and resident meetings. Appropriate groups to brief could include, for example, the Renton Downtown Partnership Board of Directors. o Attending up to one (1) City public event, as needed. • Prepare Monthly Progress Reports and Invoices. Prepare and submit progress reports and monthly invoices showing activities completed, budget, and schedule status, and identifying key issues. Deliverable(s): • Project stakeholder list • Project website content and one update • Project fact sheet • Project outreach graphics to include in materials (up to two) • Community meeting public input summaries • Monthly progress reports / invoices Assumption(s): • Participation in meetings and public events is limited to those defined under this task. Consultant participation will include attending existing meetings and preparing a brief public input summary after each event. City or other team member(s) will make the presentation. • City webmaster will format and populate project website with content and graphics provided by Consultant. • Draft deliverables will be provided for up to two rounds of City review prior to finalization. • City will be responsible for reproducing and distributing project materials. AGENDA ITEM #7. m) Renton Downtown Utility Improvements Project May 31, 2018 Public Outreach Scope – EnviroIssues Page 3 Cost Estimate Staff Ryan Orth Assoc. 3/PM Assoc. 1 Project Coord. Graphics Billing Rate $140.51 $95.66 $80.72 $95.66 TOTAL HOURS 6 30 11 5 52 TOTAL LABOR COST $843.06 $2,869.80 $887.92 $478.30 $5,079.78 TOTAL DIRECT COST $172.50 TOTAL $5,251.58 Task 1 Public Information and Outreach Total Hours 6 30 11 5 52 Total Labor $843.06 $2,869.80 $887.92 $478.30 $5,079.78 Direct Costs Item Quantity Cost Each Item Cost Black and white copies 200 $0.10 $20.00 Color copies 50 $0.89 $44.50 Mileage 200 $0.54 $108.00 AGENDA ITEM #7. m) City of Renton MURRAYSMITH DUIP – Phase 2 June 2018 1 H:\EVT_Projects\16\1883 - Renton Downtown Utility Improvement\122 Phase II Scope Development\20180702 Phase 2 DUIP SOW.docx EXHIBIT B TIME SCHEDULE OF COMPLETION DOWNTOWN UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT – PHASE 2: PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING AND DESIGN CITY OF RENTON Preliminary Estimate Schedule Murraysmith shall begin work immediately upon receipt of Notice to Proceed from the City and proceed according to the preliminary estimated schedule presented below. However, the schedule may change due to factors beyond Murraysmith's control. Preliminary Design Tasks Estimated Completion Phase 2 Notice to Proceed Early August 2018 Task 101 - Project Management August 2018 – March 2019 Task 102 - Project Meetings and Coordination August 2018 – March 2019 Task 201 – Field Survey & Base Map Development August 2018 – October 2018 Task 202 – Potholing October 2018 – December 2018 Task 300 - Horizontal Alignment Analysis & Preliminary Layout (30%) October 2018 – January 2019 Task 400 - Preliminary Design (50%) January 2019 – March 2019 Task 501 - Public Involvement August 2018 – March 2019 Task 601 - Phase 3 Final Design Scope Development January 2019 – March 2019 AGENDA ITEM #7. m) ESTIMATED FEES Discipline Breakdown Principal Engineer IV Principal Engineer III Professional Engineer V Engineering Designer II Technician III Administrative I Hours Direct Labor Loaded Labor Total Kreshel Schuyler Arifin Ogden Williams Bostic Fee Fee KPG, P.S.LineScape EnviroIssues Task 101 - Project Management -$ -$ -$ Task 101.1 - Project Status Reporting 2 12 18 32 1,377$ 4,666$ -$ -$ 4,666$ 933.14$ 1,866.27$ 1,866.27$ Task 101.2 - Staff/Consultant Team Management 4 12 12 28 1,611$ 5,461$ -$ -$ 5,461$ 1,092.16$ 2,184.33$ 2,184.33$ Task 101.3 - Invoices and Budget Oversight 2 6 6 18 32 1,199$ 4,064$ -$ 100$ 4,164$ 832.77$ 1,665.53$ 1,665.53$ Task 101.4 - Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC)77 77 5,652$ 19,153$ -$ -$ 19,153$ 3,830.55$ 7,661.09$ 7,661.09$ Task 101 Subtotal 85 30 18 0 0 36 169 9,839$ 33,343$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 100$ 33,443$ 6,689$ 13,377$ 13,377$ Task 102 - Project Meetings and Coordination Task 102.1 - Phase 2 Kick-Off Meeting 3 4 4 2 1 14 741$ 2,513$ -$ 32$ 2,545$ 509.02$ 1,018.05$ 1,018.05$ Task 102.2 - General Project Meetings/Coordination 8 16 16 8 4 52 2,672$ 9,056$ -$ -$ 9,056$ 1,811.18$ 3,622.37$ 3,622.37$ Task 102.3 - Water Utility Design Meetings/Coordination 6 12 12 2 2 34 1,862$ 6,310$ -$ 65$ 6,375$ 1,275.01$ 2,550.02$ 2,550.02$ Task 102.4 - Sewer Utility Design Meetings/Coordination 6 12 12 2 2 34 1,862$ 6,310$ -$ 65$ 6,375$ 1,275.01$ 2,550.02$ 2,550.02$ Task 102.5 - Surface Water Utility Design Meetings/Coordination 6 12 12 2 2 34 1,862$ 6,310$ -$ 65$ 6,375$ 1,275.01$ 2,550.02$ 2,550.02$ Task 102.6 - Concurrent City Projects Coordination 1 16 16 5 2 40 2,025$ 6,861$ -$ 65$ 6,926$ 1,385.14$ 2,770.28$ 2,770.28$ Task 102.7 - City Departments Correspondence and Coordination 1 16 16 5 2 40 2,025$ 6,861$ -$ 65$ 6,926$ 1,385.14$ 2,770.28$ 2,770.28$ Task 102.8 - Franchise Utilities Coordination 1 16 16 5 2 40 2,025$ 6,861$ -$ 65$ 6,926$ 1,385.14$ 2,770.28$ 2,770.28$ Task 102.9 - SPU and King County Coordination 1 16 16 5 2 40 2,025$ 6,861$ -$ 65$ 6,926$ 1,385.14$ 2,770.28$ 2,770.28$ Task 102 Subtotal 33 120 120 36 0 19 328 17,098$ 57,943$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 486$ 58,429$ 11,686$ 23,372$ 23,372$ Task 201 - Field Survey & Base Map Development 144,474$ 144,474$ -$ 144,474$ 28,894.80$ 57,789.60$ 57,789.60$ Task 201.1 - Coordination with KPG, Inc.1 4 10 4 8 27 1,140$ 3,865$ -$ 209$ 4,073$ 814.69$ 1,629.37$ 1,629.37$ Task 201.2 - Coordination with the City 1 4 10 4 19 874$ 2,961$ -$ -$ 2,961$ 592.10$ 1,184.20$ 1,184.20$ Task 201 Subtotal 2 8 20 8 8 0 46 2,014$ 6,825$ 144,474$ -$ -$ 144,474$ 209$ 151,508$ 30,302$ 60,603$ 60,603$ Task 202 - Potholing 0 -$ 197,230$ 197,230$ -$ 197,230$ 39,446.00$ 78,892.00$ 78,892.00$ Task 202.1 - Coordination with LineScape 1 4 10 4 19 874$ 2,961$ -$ 65$ 3,025$ 605.06$ 1,210.12$ 1,210.12$ Task 202 Subtotal 1 4 10 4 0 0 19 874$ 2,961$ -$ 197,230$ -$ 197,230$ 65$ 200,255$ 40,051$ 80,102$ 80,102$ Task 300 - Horizontal Alignment Analysis & Preliminary (30%) Layout -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Task 300 Subtotal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Task 301 - Water Utility 30 percent Horizontal Alignment 12 17 67 72 6 174 6,065$ 20,554$ -$ 1,578$ 22,133$ 22,132.87$ Task 301 Subtotal 0 12 17 67 72 6 174 6,065$ 20,554$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,578$ 22,133$ 22,133$ -$ -$ Task 302 - Sewer Utility 30 percent Horizontal Alignment 25 34 133 143 11 346 12,115$ 41,056$ -$ 2,856$ 43,913$ 43,912.57$ Task 302 Subtotal 0 25 34 133 143 11 346 12,115$ 41,056$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,856$ 43,913$ -$ 43,913$ -$ Task 303 - Stormwater Utility 30 percent Horizontal Alignment 25 34 133 143 11 346 12,115$ 41,056$ -$ 2,856$ 43,913$ 43,912.57$ Task 303 Subtotal 0 25 34 133 143 11 346 12,115$ 41,056$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,856$ 43,913$ -$ -$ 43,913$ Task 400 - Preliminary (50%) Design -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Task 400 Subtotal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Task 401 - Water Utility 50 percent Horizontal Alignment 12 17 67 72 6 174 6,065$ 20,554$ -$ 1,578$ 22,133$ 22,132.87$ Task 401 Subtotal 0 12 17 67 72 6 174 6,065$ 20,554$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,578$ 22,133$ 22,133$ -$ -$ Task 402 - Sewer Utility 50 percent Horizontal Alignment 25 34 133 144 12 348 12,171$ 41,243$ -$ 2,874$ 44,118$ 44,117.66$ Task 402 Subtotal 0 25 34 133 144 12 348 12,171$ 41,243$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,874$ 44,118$ -$ 44,118$ -$ Task 403 - Stormwater Utility 50 percent Horizontal Alignment 25 34 133 144 12 348 12,171$ 41,243$ -$ 2,874$ 44,118$ 44,117.66$ Task 403 Subtotal 0 25 34 133 144 12 348 12,171$ 41,243$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,874$ 44,118$ -$ -$ 44,118$ Task 501 - Public Involvement 5,777$ 5,777$ -$ 5,777$ 1,155.35$ 2,310.70$ 2,310.70$ Task 501.1 - Coordination with EnviroIssues 1 8 16 8 16 4 53 2,134$ 7,233$ -$ 520$ 7,754$ 1,550.71$ 3,101.42$ 3,101.42$ Task 501 Subtotal 1 8 16 8 16 4 53 2,134$ 7,233$ -$ -$ 5,777$ 5,777$ 520$ 13,530$ 2,706$ 5,412$ 5,412$ Task 601 - Phase 3 - Final Design Scope Development -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Task 601.1 - Phase 3 Scoping 2 12 16 4 4 38 1,833$ 6,211$ -$ 32$ 6,243$ 1,248.67$ 2,497.35$ 2,497.35$ Task 601 Subtotal 2 12 16 4 0 4 38 1,833$ 6,211$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 32$ 6,243$ 1,249$ 2,497$ 2,497$ TOTAL - ALL TASKS 124 306 370 726 742 121 2389 94,495$ 320,224$ 144,474$ 197,230$ 5,777$ 347,481$ 16,031$ 683,735$ 136,948$ 273,394$ 273,394$ Direct Salary Cost (DSC)94,495$ Overhead Cost 202.57%191,419$ Subtotal (DSC + Overhead)285,914$ Net Fee 12%34,310$ Subconsultants 347,481$ Direct Non-Salary Costs 16,031$ Grand Total 683,735$ EXHIBIT C CITY OF RENTON DOWNTOWN UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT PHASE 2: PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING AND DESIGN FEE ESTIMATE Storm LABOR CLASSIFICATION (HOURS) Subconsultants ExpensesSubconsultant Total SewerWater CITY OF RENTON JUNE 2018 H:\EVT_Projects\16\1883 - Renton Downtown Utility Improvement\122 Phase II Scope Development\Renton DUIP Phase 2 Fee Est FINAL Murraysmith, Inc. Engineers/Planners DUIP PHASE 2: PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Page 1 AGENDA ITEM #7. m) City of Renton MURRAYSMITH DUIP – Phase 2 June 2018 1 H:\EVT_Projects\16\1883 - Renton Downtown Utility Improvement\122 Phase II Scope Development\20180702 Phase 2 DUIP SOW.docx EXHIBIT D SCHEDULE OF CHARGES DOWNTOWN UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT – PHASE 2: PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING AND DESIGN CITY OF RENTON Personnel Labor will be invoiced by staff classification at the following hourly rates, which are valid from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018. The City agrees to allow the Consultant and sub- consultants to adjust rates on an annual basis in January of each year. Principal Engineers $208.00 – $248.00 Professional Engineers $147.00 – $190.00 Engineering Designers $129.00 – $192.00 Technicians $100.00 – $143.00 Administrative $87.00 – $107.00 Direct Expenses Expenses incurred in-house that are directly attributable to the project will be invoiced at actual cost. These expenses include the following: Computer Aided Design and Drafting .......................... $18.00/hour GIS and Hydraulic Modeling ............................$10.00/hour Mileage ..........................................................................Current IRS Rate Postage and Delivery Services .....................................At Cost Printing and Reproduction ...........................................At Cost Travel, Lodging and Subsistence ..................................At Cost Outside Services: Outside technical, professional, and other services will be invoiced at actual cost plus 10 percent to cover administration and overhead. AGENDA ITEM #7. m)   1  CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON    RESOLUTION NO. _______    A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, REVOKING THE CITY  COUNCIL’S DELEGATION OF IWEN WANG AS THE AUTHORIZED INDIVIDUAL  DELEGATED TO ADMINISTER THE INVESTMENT OF CITY OF RENTON MONIES IN  THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT INVESTMENT POOL, AND DESIGNATING THE  ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES ADMINISTRATOR, BY TITLE, AS THE AUTHORIZED  INDIVIDUAL.    WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 294, Laws of 1986, the Legislature created a trust fund to  be known as the public funds investment account (commonly referred to as the  Local  Government Investment Pool (“LGIP”)) for the contribution and withdrawal  of money by an   authorized governmental entity for purposes of investment by the Office of the State Treasurer;  and  WHEREAS, the City Council, by Resolution No. 4217, passed on June 23, 2014, authorized  the contribution and withdrawal of City monies in the LGIP in the manner prescribed by law, rule,  and prospectus; and  WHEREAS, the City Council, by Resolution No. 4217, designated Iwen Wang, the former  Administrative Services Administrator, as the “authorized individual” to contribute or withdraw  City of Renton funds in the LGIP, and to authorize all amendments, changes, or alterations to the  Local Government Investment Pool Transaction Authorization Form (“Form”) or any other  documentation including the designation of other individuals to make contributions and  withdrawals on behalf of the City; and  WHEREAS, as required by Section IV of Resolution No. 4217, the City Council is required  provide written notice that the authorized individual has been terminated or that his or her  delegation has been revoked;  AGENDA ITEM # 9. a)   RESOLUTION NO. ________  2  NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO  RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:  SECTION I.  The City Council hereby revokes its delegation of Iwen Wang as the LGIP  authorized individual due to her retirement and termination of employment with the City of  Renton.  SECTION II.  The City hereby designates the Administrative Services Administrator, by  title, as the “authorized individual” to contribute or withdraw City of Renton funds in the LGIP,  and to authorize all amendments, changes, or alterations to the Form or any other  documentation including the designation of other individuals to make contributions and  withdrawals on behalf of the City.   SECTION II. The City will cause to be filed a certified copy of this resolution with the  Office of the State Treasurer as written notice of the revocation and new designation.  PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this ______ day of _______________________, 2018.        ______________________________  Jason A. Seth, City Clerk       APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this ______ day of _______________________, 2018.        ______________________________  Denis Law, Mayor            AGENDA ITEM # 9. a)   RESOLUTION NO. ________  3  Approved as to form:      ______________________________  Shane Moloney, City Attorney    RES:1779:7/25/18:scr  AGENDA ITEM # 9. a)