Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES 4360CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
RESOLUTION NO. 4360
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING BY
REFERENCE THE CURRENT CAPITAL FACILITIES PLANS FOR KENT, ISSAQUAH, AND
RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICTS.
WHEREAS, under Section 4-1-190 of Chapter 1, Administration and Enforcement, of Title
IV (Development Regulations), the City of Renton has heretofore collected school impact fees on
behalf of the Kent, Issaquah, and Renton School Districts; and
WHEREAS, the Kent, Issaquah, and Renton School Districts each have requested that the
City of Renton adopt their District's current Capital Facilities Plans; and
WHEREAS, as established in the current Kent School District Capital Facilities Plan, the
school impact fee rates for the Kent School District have been calculated at $5,397 per single
family dwelling unit, and $2,279 per new multi -family dwelling unit, an increase from the prior
rates of $5,235 and $2,267, respectively; and
WHEREAS, as established in the current Issaquah School District Capital Facilities plan,
the school impact fee rates for the Issaquah School District have been calculated at $15,276 per
single family dwelling unit, and $4,399 per new multi -family dwelling unit, an increase from the
prior rates of $8,762 and $3,461, respectively; and
WHEREAS, as established in the current Renton School District Capital Facilities Plan, the
school impact fee rates for the Renton School District have been calculated at $6,877 per single
family dwelling unit, and $2,455 per new multi -family dwelling unit, a decrease from the prior
single family dwelling unit rate of $7,772 and an increase from the prior multi -family dwelling
unit rate of $1,570; and
1
RESOLUTION NO. 4360
WHEREAS, the rate charged on behalf of each District is listed in the City of Renton Fee
Schedule;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO
RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. The City Council of the City of Renton hereby adopts by reference as if fully
set forth herein the following Capital Facilities Plans, including adopting the school impact fee
rates set forth in those Capital Facilities Plans to take effect on January 1, 2019, and which will
be listed in an updated City of Renton Fee Schedule:
2018;
A. The Kent School District Capital Facilities Plan 2018-2019 - 2023-2024, dated April
B. The 2018 Capital Facilities Plan of Issaquah School District No. 411, dated May 23,
2018; and
C. The 2018 Capital Facilities Plan of Renton School District No. 403, dated May 2018.
SECTION II. Copies of each Capital Facilities Plan adopted herein by reference will be
on file with the City Clerk.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 19th day of November, 2018.
JasorVA. Seth, Oily Clerk
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 19th day of November, 2018.
Denis Law, Mayor
2
RESOLUTION NO. 4360
Approved as to form:
Shane Moloney, Cit ttorney
RES:1784:10/2/18:scr
2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
Issaquah School District No. 411
Issaquah, Washington
Adopted May 23, 2018
Resolution No. 1116
The Issaquah School District No. 411 hereby provides this Capital Facilities
Plan documenting present and future school facility requirements of the
District. The plan contains all elements required by the Growth Management
Act and King County Council Ordinance 21-A.
Table of Contents
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.........................................................................3
STANDARD OF SERVICE.......................................................................4
TRIGGER OF CONSTRUCTION..............................................................5
DEVELOPMENT TRACKING...................................................................5
NEED FOR IMPACT FEES......................................................................6
ENROLLMENT METHODOLOGY.............................................................8
TABLE ONE:
ACTUAL STUDENT COUNTS 2009-10 through 2017-18
ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS 2018-19 through 2032-33 ...................9
TABLE TWO: STUDENT FACTORS - SINGLE FAMILY ............................10
TABLE THREE: STUDENT FACTORS - MULTI -FAMILY ...........................1
1
INVENTORY AND EVALUATION OF CURRENT FACILITIES ......................12
SITE LOCATION MAP..........................................................................13
SIX -YEAR CONSTRUCTION PLAN........................................................14
TABLE FOUR: PROJECTED CAPACITY TO HOUSE STUDENTS .............14
SCHOOL IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS.................................................15
BASIS FOR DATA USED IN SCHOOL IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS .........16
APPENDIX A: 2017-18 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CAPACITIES...................17
APPENDIX B: 2017-18 MIDDLE SCHOOL CAPACITIES ............................18
APPENDIX C: 2017-18 HIGH SCHOOL CAPACITIES...............................19
APPENDIX D: 2017-18 DISTRICT TOTAL CAPACITIES ............................
20
APPENDIX E: SIX -YEAR FINANCE PLAN...............................................21
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") has been prepared by the Issaquah
School District (the "District") as the District's primary facility planning document, in
compliance with the requirements of Washington's Growth Management Act and King
County Council Code Title 21A. This Plan was prepared using data available in May,
2018.
This Plan is an update of prior long-term Capital Facilities Plans adopted by the Issaquah
School District. However, this Plan is not intended to be the sole Plan for all of the District's
needs. The District may prepare interim and periodic Long Range Capital Facilities Plans
consistent with board policies, taking into account a longer or a shorter time period, other
factors and trends in the use of facilities, and other needs of the District as may be
required. Any such plan or plans will be consistent with this Six -Year Capital Facilities
Plan.
In June 1992, the District first submitted a request to King County to impose and to collect
school impact fees on new developments in unincorporated King County. On November
16, 1992, the King County Council first adopted the District's Plan and a fee implementing
ordinance. This Plan is the annual update of the Six -Year Plan.
King County and the cities of Issaquah, Renton, Bellevue, Newcastle and Sammamish
collect impact fees on behalf of the District. Most of these jurisdictions provide exemptions
from impact fees for senior housing and certain low-income housing.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Growth Management Act, this Plan will be updated on
an annual basis, and any charges in the fee schedule(s) adjusted accordingly.
STANDARD OF SERVICE
School facility and student capacity needs are dictated by the types and amounts of space
required to accommodate the District's adopted educational program. The educational
program standards which typically drive facility space needs include grade configuration,
optimal facility size, class size, educational program offerings, as well as classroom
utilization and scheduling requirements and use of re -locatable classroom facilities
(portables).
Different class sizes are used depending on the grade level or programs offered such as
special education or the gifted program. With the passage of Initiative 728 in November
2000, the Issaquah School Board established new class size standards for elementary
grades K-5. The Board and District Administration will continue to keep class sizes near
the levels provided by 1-728; this will be done via local levy funds. There is also legislation
that requires the State to fund Full -Day Kindergarten by 2018. The District provided Full -
Day Kindergarten for the 2016-2017 school year. A class size average of 20 for grades
K-5 is now being used to calculate building capacities. A class size of 26 is used for
grades 6-8 and 28 for grades 9-12. Special Education class size is based on 12 students
per class. For the purpose of this analysis, rooms designated for special use, consistent
with the provisions of King County Council Code Title 21A, are not considered classrooms.
Invariably, some classrooms will have student loads greater in number than this average
level of service and some will be smaller. Program demands, state and federal
requirements, collective bargaining agreements, and available funding may also affect this
level of service in the years to come. Due to these variables, a utilization factor of 95% is
used to adjust design capacities to what a building may actually accommodate.
Portables used as classrooms are used to accommodate enrollment increases for interim
purposes until permanent classrooms are available. When permanent facilities become
available, the portable(s) is either moved to another school as an interim classroom or
removed.
The King County decision to no longer allow schools to be built outside the Urban Growth
Boundary Line (UGBL) means District owned property planned for a new elementary
school and middle school cannot be used. The District recently sold this planned site to
a third party. The District will need to locate alternative sites inside the UGBL. The State
does not provide funding for property purchases.
Approved Bond funding provides for a new high school, new middle school, two new
elementary schools, a rebuild/expansion of an existing middle school and additions to six
existing elementary schools.
4
TRIGGER OF CONSTRUCTION
The Issaquah School District Capital Facilities Plan proposes construction of a new high
school, a new middle school, two new elementary schools, the re-build/expansion of an
existing middle school and additions to five existing elementary schools to meet the needs
of elementary, middle school and high school capacity needs. The need for new schools
and school additions is triggered by comparing our enrollment forecasts with our
permanent capacity figures. These forecasts are by grade level and, to the extent
possible, by geography. The analysis provides a list of new construction needed by school
year.
The decision on when to construct a new facility involves factors other than verified need.
Funding is the most serious consideration. Factors including the potential tax rate for our
citizens, the availability of state funds and impact fees, the ability to acquire land, and the
ability to pass bond issues determine when any new facility can be constructed. The
planned facilities will be funded by a bond passed on April 26, 2016, school impact fees
and reserve funds held by the District. New school facilities are a response to new housing
which the county or cities have approved for construction.
The District's Six -Year Finance Plan is shown in Appendix E.
DEVELOPMENT TRACKING
In order to increase the accuracy and validity of enrollment projections, a major emphasis
has been placed on the collection and tracking data of known new housing developments.
This data provides two useful pieces of planning information. First, it is used to determine
the actual number of students that are generated from a single family or multi -family
residence. It also provides important information on the impact new housing
developments will have on existing facilities and/or the need for additional facilities.
Developments that have been completed or are still selling houses are used to forecast
the number of students who will attend our schools from future developments. Generation
rates for elementary school, middle school and high school student per new single-family
residence and new multi -family housing is shown on page 10 and page 11.
NEED FOR IMPACT FEES
Impact fees and state matching funds have not been a reliable source of revenue.
Because of this, the Issaquah School District asked its voters on February 7, 2006 to fund
the construction of an elementary school, one middle school, expand Maywood Middle
School, expand Liberty High School, and rebuild Issaquah High School. District voters
also approved on April 17, 2012 a ballot measure that provided funding to expand two
elementary schools, rebuild/expand two additional elementary schools, add classrooms
to one high school and rebuild/expand one middle school. Due to the high cost of land
and the limited availability of a parcel large enough to accommodate a middle school
program, the School Board reallocated the moneys designated to build the middle school
to expand the capacity of Issaquah and Skyline high schools. On April 26, 2016 voters
approved bond funding for the construction of a new high school, a new middle school
and two new elementary schools, the rebuild/expansion of an existing middle school and
additions to six existing elementary schools.
As demonstrated in Appendix A, (page 17) the District currently has a permanent
capacity (at 100%) to serve 8288 students at the elementary level. Appendix B, (page
18) shows a permanent capacity (at 100%) for 4480 students at the middle school level
Appendix C (page 19) shows a permanent capacity (at 100%) of 5580 students at the
high school level. Current enrollment is identified on page 9. The District elementary
projected Oct 2018 FTE is 9658. Adjusting permanent capacity by 95% leaves the
District's elementary enrollment over permanent capacity at the elementary level by
1784 students (Appendix A). At the middle school level, the projected Oct 2018
headcount is 5034. This is 778 students over permanent capacity (Appendix B). At the
high school level the district is over permanent capacity by 479 students (Appendix C).
Based on the District's student generation rates, the District expects that 0.763 students
will be generated from each new single family home and 0.24 students will be generated
from each new multi -family dwelling unit.
Applying the enrollment projections contained on page 9 to the District's existing
permanent capacity (Appendices A, B, and C) and if no capacity improvements are made
by the year 2023-24, and permanent capacity is adjusted to 95%, the District elementary
population will be over its permanent capacity by 1986 students, at the middle school level
by 1117 students, and will be over its permanent capacity by 1382 at the high school level.
The District's enrollment projections are developed using two methods: first, the cohort
survival — historical enrollment method is used to forecast enrollment growth based upon
the progression of existing students in the District; then, the enrollment projections are
modified to include students anticipated from new developments in the District.
6
To address existing and future capacity needs, the District's six -year construction plan includes the
following capacity projects:
Facility
Projected
Location
Additional
Expansions
Completion Date
Capacity
New High School
2021
Issaquah
1600
New Middle School
2021
Issaquah
850
Rebuild/Expand Pine Lake Middle
2018
Sammamish
242
New Elementary #16
2020
Issaquah
680
New Elementary #17
2021
Sammamish
680
Expand Cougar Ridge Elementary
2018
Bellevue
120
Expand Discovery Elementary
2019
Sammamish
120
Expand Endeavour Elementary
2019
King County
120
Expand Maple Hills Elementary
2020
King County
120
Expand Sunset Elementary
2018
Bellevue
120
Creekside Elementary Portable
2018
Sammamish
40
Maple Hills Elementary Portable
2018
King County
40
Challenger Elementary Portable
2018
Sammamish
40
Pine Lake Middle School Portable
2018
Sammamish
56
Sunny Hills Elementary Portables
2018
Sammamish
80
Issaquah Middle School Portables
2018
Issaquah
208
Issaquah High School Portable
2018
Issaquah
56
Maywood Middle School Portable
2018
King County
56
Based upon the District's capacity data and enrollment projections, as well as the student generation
data, the District has determined that a majority of its capacity improvements are necessary to serve
students generated by new development.
The school impact fee formula ensures that new development only pays for the cost of the facilities
necessitated by new development. The fee calculations examine the costs of housing the students
generated by each new single family dwelling unit or each new multi -family dwelling unit and then
reduces that amount by the anticipated state match and future tax payments. The resulting impact
fee is then discounted further. Thus, by applying the student generation factor to the school project
costs, the fee formula only calculates the costs of providing capacity to serve each new dwelling unit.
The formula does not require new development to contribute the costs of providing capacity to address
existing needs.
The King County Council and the City Councils of the Cities of Bellevue, Issaquah, Newcastle, Renton
and Sammamish have created a framework for collecting school impact fees and the District can
demonstrate that new developments will have an impact on the District. The impact fees will be used
in a manner consistent with RCW 82.02.050 - .100 and the adopted local ordinances. Engrossed
Senate Bill 5923, enacted in the 2015 Legislative Session, requires that developers be provided an
option to defer payment of impact fees to final inspection, certificate of occupancy, or closing, with no
fees deferred longer than 18 months from building permit issuance. The District adopts the positions
that: (1) no school impact fee should be collected later than the earlier of final inspection or 18 months
from the time of building permit issuance; and (2) no developer applicant should be permitted to defer
payment of school impact fees for more than 20 dwelling units in a single year. The District's recent
and ongoing student growth, coupled with the need for the timely funding and construction of new
facilities to serve this growth, requires strict adherence to this position.
ENROLLMENT METHODOLOGY
Two basic techniques are used, with the results compared, to establish the most likely
range of anticipated student enrollment:
1. The student 3-2-1 cohort survival method. Examine Issaquah School District
enrollments for the last 5 years and determine the average cohort survival for the
consecutive five-year period. Because cohort survival does not consider students
generated from new development it is a conservative projection of actual
enrollment. For the same reason, these projections are also slow to react to actual
growth.
2. Based on information from King County, realtors, developers, etc., seek to
establish the number of new dwelling units that will be sold each year. The new
dwelling units are converted to new students based on the following:
a) The number of actual new students as a percentage of actual new dwellings
for the past several years.
b) Determine the actual distribution of new students by grade level for the past
several years, i.e., 5% to kindergarten, 10% to first grade, 2% to 11th grade,
etc.
c) Based on an examination of the history shown by (a) and (b) above, establish
the most likely factor to apply to the projected new dwellings.
After determining the expected new students, the current actual student enrollments are
moved forward from year to year with the arrived at additions.
One of the challenges associated with all projection techniques is that they tend to always
show growth because the number of houses and the general population always increases.
Enrollments, however, can and do decrease even as the population increases. The
reason is as the population matures, the number of kindergartners will go down as the
number of 10th graders is still increasing. To adjust for this factor, the number of school
age children per dwelling is examined. When this number exceeds expectations, it is
probably because the District is still assuming kindergarten growth, while the main growth
is actually moving into middle school. When this happens, a reduction factor is added to
kindergarten to force it to decrease even though the general population continues to grow.
A precise statistical formula has not been developed to make this adjustment.
After all of the projections have been made and examined, the most likely range is
selected. An examination of past projections compared with actual enrollment indicates
the cohorts tend to be more accurate over a ten-year time span while dwelling units tend
to be more accurate over a shorter period. The probable reason is that over a ten-year
period, the projections tend to average out even though there are major shifts both up and
down within the period.
Enrollment projections for the years 2018-2019 through 2032-2033 are shown in Table
One. Student generation factors are shown in Table Two and Table Three.
TABLE ONE:
ACTUAL STUDENT COUNTS 2009-10 through 2017-18
ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS 2018-19 through 2032-33
FTE EnrGUment
Yea
K
1ST
ZVD
M
SIH
5M
6TH
7TH
ETH
9M
IM
11IH
12TH
TOW
K-5
64
9-li
Total
2DR9-la
593
1319
1351
12M
1371
12M
IM
179
I255
1325
1171
1IT!
1147
MUM
7NIJ
3UO
477
15))07
291D-11
613
LM
1355
1385
1319
1400
IM
Md
12PE
1326
1333
RID
1015
Idim
741M
3M
4783
14.➢38
2011-12
6W
1396
1423
1374
1417
1346
14'
L311
L146
I34I
1319
I?U
1021
Memo
7545
4C"
4934
16.w
2012-13
651
136I
1467
1496
1440
1448
1,02
1447
1339
1412
1353
IZ25
U46
17
2013-14
654
1499
1414
1536
149E
1477
14w-
1391
1463
L444
14W
12D
111
17A*
M59
4316
5091
17,96
2014-15
6W
1494
1552
1478
L%5
1555
1312
1*1
I432
105
13M
3292
1115
16,406
8317
4435
5
ISX6
ZOW16
661
1547
155E
MS
1548
1iM
I600
I55?
IP-0
14T2
1489
11B}
1116
WAS
m
46'rl
1254
IRAO,
24i6-19+
1403
1423
16Y3
1609
1650
IW4
I626
IW-6
iiW
1565
14.
MO
MR
"AN
9376
4907
53.93
19,6D6
2U"B
14r.
1%1
153f
101
1611
163D
I627
1655
I692
1E9
1545
1243
116'
ZRP"
95>6
49B
5
*aAim
2018-19
13-4'
1611
1617
1590
1716
1678
170
1551
16?7
Iff"
1619
Il37L
111
n;,M
a76a
5M
5720
MA72
2019-26
1311
I610
16M
1675
1&4
1753
1711
1733
UEO
171.3
1670
M6
1243
29P6
971D
5i23
60B
2m895
2021-21
1406
I530
1670
1739
1723
160
I7PO
1739
17D
Mb
1?W
1474
1306
21XW
971P,
r^._E
=D
ZI"
IM 22
1398
15M
1539
l72?
1760
1752
I693
1815
I7S
IlV5
1706
1505
1350
21r1%'3
9791
52-2
63a5
21,41E
2922-23
1396
1556
1611
11547
1757
1796
1779
1719
IM
1?9i
1792
15U7
1376
21 n
9773
53M
040
2115M
2623-24
1535
1557
IM
1678
1673
1795
=5
I805
1743
19 r
1'S7
159_'
13.
n OR
935E
5m
663E
21AM
2021-25
15.8
1695
1616
JM
17.11
1717
=5
1851
U00
1779
1SE
Il594
1464
njM
9954
55W
dM9
EZ160
MS-26
IW
17E9
1754
1673
170S
1749
1747
1851
EM
1866
1768
IM7
1467
W71
10131
5474
67P
W71
2026 27
1557
I707
1761
1811
1705
1743
rrm
1772
rv6
19II
1$55
1373
22fi84
laM
54 T
W9
22,587
2"728
156E
1716
1765
1818
IM
1742
ITT2
1834
I73r7
1911
"M
1660
1445
22,70
1045T_
5373
d9I5
22,7Aa
202E-29
1550
1729
1775
1922
1850
18SIl
ITT?
179S
1129
IM
ON
1707
221973
im
533
WE
Z"75
7CGG.29-30
1553
1710
1786
W2
1954
1M
1910
I79S
12M
IM
=
1?06
L5V
ZRAU
10623
Ml
W.,
ZJAU
2430,31
1555
I713
1768
1843
18M
184-
1919
I936
I323
IBM
IRU
1673
153
232"
106i5
-w-
6916
7szr
2031,32
1536
I715
1771
1825
I875
NM
190-1
19"
L961
1953
1.847
IIC69
23,333
106"
ms
73333
203223
1556
1716
1773
I=
1837
1913
1931
1947
L90
M 6
184?
16M
1531
TZ1 3
IN"
5S4
, M"
23"
M r♦r `7 Era;mEr11 m(If= She 3d1116n Li .'tZE FLMdM F111 COaj MCEWrIlE
TABLE TWO: STUDENT FACTORS -SINGLE FAMILY
2017-18 Single Family
Single Family Development
Belvedere
Cavalia
Cedarcroft
Claremont @ Renton
Forest Heights
Glencoe, Preswick & Kinlock @ Trossachs
Heritage Estates
Highcroft @ Sammamish
Issaquah Highlands
Issaquah Highlands - Ichijo Sun Ridge
Lawson Park
Liberty Gardens
Overlook @ Brookshire
Summit Pickering/Inneswood Estates
Rivenwood
Shorelane Vistas
Symphony Ridge (new area)
TOTALS
SINGLE FAMILY
Elementary School
Middle School 6 - 8
High School 9 -12
TOTAL
STUDENTS
# Planned
# Sold
K-5 6-8 9-12 Total
94
92
42
17
20
79
49
49
21
12
22
55
27
4
0
0
1
1
91
91
18
3
12
33
24
6
0
1
0
1
211
198
80
45
76
201
86
86
57
20
18
95
121
120
48
19
27
94
311
236
42
27
61
130
35
35
11
5
12
28
31
31
20
6
8
34
36
36
3
1
5
9
38
36
7
2
1
10
30
21
10
9
11
30
52
52
20
8
13
41
38
38
8
6
13
27
57
51
19
6
9
34
1331
1182
406
187
309
902
0.343
0.158
0.261
0.763
These developments are currently under construction or have been completed within the past five years
10
AVERAGE PER UNIT
K-5
6-8
9-12
Total
0.457
0.185
0.217
0.859
0.429
0.245
0.449
1.122
0
0
0.25
0-25
0.198
0.033
0.132
0.363
0
0.167
0
0.167
0.404
0.227
0.384
1.015
0.663
0233
0.209
1.105
0.4
0.158
0.225
0.783
0.178
0.114
0.258
0-551
0.314
0.143
0.343
0.8
0.645
0.194
0.258
1.097
0.083
0-028
0.139
0.25
0.194
0.056
0.028
0.278
0.476
0.429
0.524
1.429
0.385
0.154
0.25
0.788
0.211
0158
0.342
0.711
0.373
0-118
0.176
0.667
0.343 0.168 0.261 0.763
TABLE THREE: STUDENT FACTORS - MULTI -FAMILY
2017-18 Multi Family STUDENTS AVERAGE PER UNIT
Multi Family Development
# Planned
# Sold
K-5
6-8
9-12
Total
Avalon Bay
900
7
3
0
1
4
Issaquah Highlands -View Ridge
38
38
10
8
7
25
Issaquah Highlands -The Brownstones
175
175
19
11
15
45
Lake Boren Townhomes
56
56
2
1
1
4
Lakehouse
41
17
4
0
1
5
Overlook @ Brookshire
42
42
2
1
0
3
Talus: Spring Peak
28
28
0
0
1
1
TOTALS
1280
363
40
21
26
87
MULTI FAMILY
Elementary School
Middle School 6 - 8
High School 9 -12
TOTAL
0.110
0.058
0.072
0.240
These developments are currently under construction or have been completed within the past fire years.
K-5
6-8
9-12
Total
0.429
0.000
0.143
0.571
0.263
0.211
0.184
0.658
0.109
0.063
0.086
0.257
0.036
0.018
0.018
0.071
0.235
0.000
0.059
0.294
0.048
0.024
0.000
0.071
0.000
0.000
0.036
0.036
0.110 0.058 0.072 0.240
INVENTORY AND EVALUATION OF CURRENT FACILITIES
Currently, using the 95% utilization factor, the District has the capacity to house 17431 students in
permanent facilities and 4195 students in portables. The projected student enrollment for the 2018-
2019 school year is expected to be 20472 including K-5 FTE which leaves a permanent capacity
deficit of 3041. Adding portable classrooms into the capacity calculations gives us a capacity of
21626 with a surplus capacity of 1154 for the K-12 student population.
Calculations of elementary, middle school and high school capacities are shown in Appendices A, B
and C. Totals are shown in Appendix D.
Below is a list of current facilities. These facility locations and sites are shown on the District Site
Location Map.
EXISTING FACILITIES LOCATION
GRADE SPAN K-5:
Apollo Elementary
15025 S.E. 1171h Street, Renton
Briarwood Elementary
17020 S.E. 134th Street, Renton
Cascade Ridge Elementary
2020 Trossachs Blvd. SE, Sammamish
Challenger Elementary
25200 S.E. Klahanie Blvd., Issaquah
Clark Elementary
335 First Ave. S.E., Issaquah
Cougar Ridge Elementary
4630 16711 Ave. S.E., Bellevue
Creekside Elementary
20777 SE 16th Street, Sammamish
Discovery Elementary
2300 228th Ave. S.E., Sammamish
Endeavour Elementary
26205 S.E. Issaquah -Fall City Rd., Issaquah
Grand Ridge Elementary
1739 NE Park Drive, Issaquah
Issaquah Valley Elementary
555 N.W. Holly Street, Issaquah
Maple Hills Elementary
15644 204th Ave. S.E., Issaquah
Newcastle Elementary
8440 136th Ave S.E., Newcastle
Sunny Hills Elementary
3200 Issaquah -Pine Lake Rd. S.E., Sammamish
Sunset Elementary
4229 W. Lk. Sammamish Pkwy. S.E., Issaquah
GRADE SPAN 6-8:
Beaver Lake Middle School
25025 S.E. 32"d Street, Issaquah
Issaquah Middle School
600 2"d Ave. Ave. S.E., Issaquah
Maywood Middle School
14490 168th Ave. S.E., Renton
Pacific Cascade Middle School
24635 SE Issaquah -Fall City Rd, Issaquah
Pine Lake Middle School
3200 228th Ave. S.E., Sammamish
GRADE SPAN 9-12:
Issaquah High School
700 Second Ave. S.E., Issaquah
Liberty High School
16655 S.E. 136th Street, Renton
Skyline High School
1122 228th Ave. S.E., Sammamish
Gibson Ek High School
379 First Ave. S.E., Issaquah
SUPPORT SERVICES:
Administration Building
565 N.W. Holly Street, Issaquah
May Valley Service Center
16404 S.E. May Valley Road, Renton
Transportation Center
805 Second Avenue S.E., Issaquah
Transportation Satellite
3402 228th Ave. S.E., Sammamish
12
�.1 to �earl�r
•Calag�
,�
M
Asdeje
wuguAr��fr�r war
9d
w �
• Nexa we
�
..�uY_ Qy
I.
coftef
[ ; 3v ft"
Mayw od
■ Mladle
3w�e+ pentw,wpr.y��R
SITE LOCATION MAP
■ SkyHno High School
' � 0lsavery
5inny Hills
pine Lake Clwillengen
Muddle Babver laic
MMdIe 405
■ Pacific
Cascade Uladie
maplowills
e 6rarod Rklp
■ h9 quab Middf e
■Issaquah High
Ater
R'
S14
■
Echo 6kn
{hiidren{e
agend
■ Bcrwtjrj5dmI
■ Middfi fth Stood
M Adminss *igflI5uppar smic 5
ON I
13
THE ISSAQUAH SCHOOL DISTRICT'S
SIX -YEAR CONSTRUCTION PLAN
The District's Six -Year Finance Plan is shown in Appendix E. Shown in Table Four is the District's
projected capacity to house students, which reflects the additional facilities as noted. Voters passed a
$533 million bond in April 2016 to fund the purchase of land for and construction of a new high school,
a new middle school, two new elementary schools, the rebuild/expansion of an existing middle school
and additions to six existing elementary schools. The District does anticipate receiving State matching
funds that would reduce future bond sale amounts or be applied to new K-12 construction projects
included in this Plan.
The District also anticipates that it will receive $500,000 in impact fees and mitigation payments that
will be applied to capital projects.
The District projects 20,472 FTE students for the 2018-2019 school year and 21,862 FTE students in
the 2023-2024 school year. Growth will be accommodated by the planned facilities. Per the formula in
the adopted school impact fee ordinance, half of the unfunded growth -related need is assigned to impact
fees and half is the local share.
TABLE FOUR: PROJECTED CAPACITY TO HOUSE STUDENTS
Projected Capacity to House Students
Years
2018-19
2019-20
2020-21
2021-22
2022-23
2023-24
Permanent Capacity
17826
18348
18348
19028
22158
22158
High School
56
1600
Middle School
346
850
Elementary School
120
680
680
Gross Totals
18348
18348
19028
22158
22158
22158
*Subtotal (Sum at 95%
Utilization Rate)
17431
17431
18077
21050
210501
21050
Portables @ 95%
4195
4195
4195
4195
4195
4195
Total Capacity
21626
21626
22272
25245
25245
25245
Projected FTE Enrollment"
20472
20896
21199
21418
21571
21862
Permanent Capacity @ 95%
(surplus/deficit
-3041
-3465
-3122
-368
-521
-812
Permanent Cap w/Portables
(surplus/deficit
1154
730
1073
3827
3674
3383
* Permanent Capacity and New Construction calculations are based on the 95% utilization
factors (see Appendix D)
The number of planned portables may be reduced if permanent capacity is increased by a future bond issue.
14
SCHOOL IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS
DISTRICT Issaquah SD #411
YEAR 2018
School Site Acquisition Cost:
((Acres x Cost per Acre)/Facility Capacity) x Student Generation Factor
Student
Student
Facility Cost/
Facility
Factor
Factor
Cost/
Cost/
Acreage Acre
Capacity
SFR
MFR
SFR
MFR
Elementary 7.00 $1,000,000
680'
0.343'
0.110
$3,536
$1,134
Middle/Jr High 10.00 $1,000,000
850 '
0.158'
0.058
$1,861
$681
High 30.00 $1,000,000
1,600 '
0.261 '
0.072
$4,902
$1,343
TOTAL
$10,299
$3,158
School Construction Cost:
((Facility Cost/Facility Capacity) x Student Generation Factor) x
(Permanent/Total Sq Ft)
Student
Student
%Penn/ Facility
Facility
Factor
Factor
Cost/
Cost/
Total Sq.Ft. Cost
Capacity
SFR
MFR
SFR
MFR
Elementary 92.37% $30,000,000
680 '
0.343'
0.110
$13,998
$4,491
Middle/Jr High 92.37% $55,000,000
850 '
0.158'
0.058
$9,456
$3,458
High 92.37% $95,000,000
1,600'
0.261 '
0.072
$14,338
$3,928
TOTAL
$37,791
$11,876
Temporary Facility Cost:
((Facility Cost/Facility Capacity) x Student Generation Factor) x
(Temporary/Total Square Feet)
Student
Student
%Temp/ Facility
Facility
Factor
Factor
Cost/
Cost/
Total Sq.Ft. Cost
Size
SFR
MFR
SFR
MFR
Elementary 7.63% $250,000
80
0.343
0.110
$82
$26
Middle/Jr High 7.63% $250,000
56
0.158
0.058
$54
$20
High 7.63% $250,000
224
0.261
0.072
$22
$6
TOTAL
$158
$52
State Matching Credit:
Area Cost Allowance x SPI Square Footage x District Match % x Student Factor
Student
Student
Current Area SPI
District
Factor
Factor
Cost/
Cosy
Cost Allowance Footage
Match %
SFR
MFR
SFR
MFR
Elementary $225.97 90
8.00%
0.343
0.110
$559
$179
Middle/Jr High $225.97 108
0.00%
0.158
0.058
$0
$0
High School $225.97 130
0.00%
0.261
0.072
$0
$0
TOTAL
$559
$179
Tax Payment Credit:
SFR
MFR
Average Assessed Value
$780,064
$321,036
Capital Bond Interest Rate
3.85%
3.85%
Net Present Value of Average Dwelling
$6,374,447
$2,623,446
Years Amortized
10
10
Property Tax Levy Rate
$1.49
$1.49
Present Value of Revenue Stream
$9,498
$3,909
Fee Summary:
Single
Multi -
Family
Family
Site Acquistion Costs
$10,298.78
$3,157.92
Permanent Facility Cost
$37,790.93
$11,876.49
Temporary Facility Cost
$158.05
$52.08
State Match Credit
($558.85)
($179.28)
Tax Payment Credit
($9,497.93)
($3,908.94)
FEE (AS CALCULATED)
$38,190.99
$10,998.27
Local Share
$22,914.59
$6,598.96
FINAL FEE
$15,276
$4,399
Each city or county sets and adopts the amount of the school impact fee.
For the applicable fee schedule, please consult with the permitting jurisdiction for the development project.
W
BASIS FOR DATA USED IN SCHOOL IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS
SCHOOL SITE ACQUISITION COST:
• Elementary Two new sites are planned for purchase
• Middle School One new site is planned for purchase
• High School One new site is planned for purchase
SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION COST:
• Elementary $30,000,000 is the proportional cost of the project providing additional
elementary capacity
• Middle School $55,000,000 is the proportional costs of the projects providing additional
middle school capacity
• High School $95,000,000 is the proportional cost of the project providing additional
high school capacity
PERCENTAGE OF PERMANENT AND TEMPORARY SQUARE FOOTAGE TO TOTAL SQUARE
FOOTAGE:
Total Square Footage
Permanent Square Footage (OSPI)
Temporary Square Footage
STATE MATCH CREDIT:
Current Area Cost Allowance
Percentage of State Match
16
2,634,410
2,459,774
187,572
$225.97
39.54%
1
0
Z
W
rv/� y`1
'o
W
roe�/�bdb Q/oSWnWjXb�
1
�d'lcob
_
V
Q
C.�����
1
V
bdb, Ibc ko
0
N�
0
O
ONg
r0e)
db'J
SS�Sb1N� �'Sb1N0a
`U)i
NHS/�
li
Q
�B1b��bdb y�A
G
OV
A% y�
W
rZ0,a
W
WooN��y
0 &
1
N
youb�ObN
64l/fib
"bow%
O�SS•`S•ybo%
�O d/bONb1S-yO
*
S7ct
yoS
'T
b
0
o
b
m
�p
O
n
OD
N
b
N
O
!'�
M
n
N
C
M
co
.-
to
M
N
a-
-a
b
N
a
inw
W
m
1
b
m
m
b
m
to
co
0
N
�
O
n
O
�
�
OD
w
M
m
m
N
m
m
m
r
m
M
O
M
m
tb
m
m
O!
m
G1
R
G1
ann
C!
Cl
b
M
r
M
m
M
m
M
r
r
m
a
O
m
m
N
r
r
b
to
t0
m
r
N
m
t0
O
b
O
00
O
N
O
to
t°
t°
Go
m
7
m
O
m
m
m
m
m
m
O
m
m
N
O
m
O
r
N
b
b
m
m
r
b
m
M
r
r
r
M
m
r
m
r
co
Co
P...b
M
P.
m
r
to
N
r
a
O
o
o
o
O
o
o
o
o
O
o
o
O
O
o
o
v
m
m
tb
N
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
O
b
�in
W
N
a
o
n
i
°O
N
m
n
m
n
co
cm
m
n
O
m
m
P<
n
n
aN
m
n
to
M
O
a
a
m
O
m
m
m
m
m
m
0
m
m
N
O
n
N
OD
b
m
b
n
b
m
M
n
n
n
M
m
n
m
cc
CO
n
ID
a
n
m
m
m
m
c0
O
0
0
0
0
0
o
O
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
N
tD
N
Cl)
O
N
0O
N
t0
O
N
N
O
N
Go
t0
V
00
to
to
N
r
N
ao
t0
O
M
O
CO
O
N
O
V
CO
N
a
0)
N
g
a
a
m
a
M
a
n
00
O
m
O
tom
m
m
m
m
0
m
co
N
O
o
m
in
b
A
a
b
m
n
b
P.
b
O
n
n
PAb
CO
O
In
n
n
mm
W
o
N
Go
c0
r
w
O
0
0
0
0
0
0
O
t0
0
N
O
0N
M
t0
M
M
M
M
M
Cl)
M
Cl)
t0
N
to
R
N
M
t°
M
CO
M
M
M
M
O
M
M
t°
'T
c
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
in
t0
t0
W
O
V
N
t0
R
t°
R
to
<
IT
V
ITtt)
W
0
U]
0c0
M
V'
t0
r
O
V7
CO
r
tr
(0
N
w
N
M
N
O
N
.-
M
r
N
I--
N
N
N
N
N
r-
N
N
W
a
N
b
co
W).0
N
t0
M
w
o
CD
it
LU
y
�
�
w
CC�JJ
W
z
S
Z
Z
F
pO,
w
Q
cn
Q
Co
0
0
U
0
U
B
W
0N
2
cn
y
A/o
ti.
..xs�o
J'O'/41
ba'bo N'�y
/blo �bN
%�y8r01?
you,
J
(g�
loll
ffww
v/
W
III
N
/P
loll0.
00
i<III
4
�
J
oN,s
z
0
( 1N,�
a_
0
-,Q'bb ��
g
k
c
'
J
yO
M-
_ o
U
C
"im
r
N
OyJ2i,
O
ti
S
%0& .y
y0
(
d
.Sh' JbdbJ
�ySS0
�, c c c �
�D
s
yO
N U U
U � T
� �
m E c
��xxpp
ym� L ID L 00
Ii
1,1■tlt
lollI
IIi1�1
1�
610
Os>"se6
4 ��1�j y�0y8
O
&0�
/pn 0°b,
�es y'br�
HBO ' .
s''�9y1� pa'da�
ary
0
J
(8�J'�lijb�J Sh'�h,/Xb
CO)
W
C
0%9
1
9
w
(8t'J�b
b
�Ob yo
2
Go
N
CD
byb
J
S'AbOB0
O&
CD
N
�J/Oti
Y O
(82j
bJ
"bO,
Sxv,
�bbyo
i
s100
h'J
syo/
y
N
Y
Y
eN-
N
rn
m
rn
o
m
m
o
to
y
N
N
m
N
O
N
r-
to
N
V
O
to
N
v
O
R
N
m
v
to
to
N
N
tt]
N
t0
N
R
N
r
to
to
tOo
O
O
N
N
N
to
O
O
to
40
In
00
mN
N
e-
N
N
N
N
fD
m
le
tD
N
N
N
m
co
N
O
co
'T
w
Ln
y
N
N
IT
O1
O
00
O
to
v
O
O
N
N
y
coo
to
CD
N
N
Y
N
e-
W
to
b
N
co
IT
CD
m
O
N
N
IT
m
O
to
N
to
N
to
N
m
O
to
y
N
O
N
O
t0
to
r,
to
m
m
Of
to
to
m
W
=
W
Er
0
U)
z
�
y
LU
m
S
J
C7 2
to
F
E�
cq
s��8�02 J
MyO
�0
N
>p
�j
N
U
x
'�iy
dbO�j�
CL
o
(It
�
6d
N
E
g
W_ use W
w
13
m
CL
U
0,Iby �y
V
Q 00 o
Os�
N
~
+
0
Z°y0s
dbb
Q Z
N
x
c
O.
aJ
ASS@
�dbyd J
a
J
N
N
bbab O
CL
cc
c0
Ns b W11q ,
U
N
v
N '�iJ yO
C
a
E
,,,
G
�
c
m
�
m
°d
is
Ole
O/0,
�Lyp
o
-f1/Ob
r
MA
a
bjCc
U
d
.%0
U
kj
c
ca
r
m
a N
U
N
a
0
0
L
D
IO
N
N
C
L
3
N
O
C.
O
L
fC
7
Cr
IO
O
.L tlf
r Q
U
w N N
'�FE�pp
f0 F N
N U
C
r
W
-
W L
300
a�
X
o 0
C N
O � C
Z
LU
=
o0E
l0
Ol
U
Cl - y
^�cc
I.L
N
■�
N
3 N C
LM
3 N
a U 9�
a
Cl
Cl
CD
U 0.6
p7�
G N O
C
N
N f0 L
N U
> 0
? a's
X
N 0 N
O
w w
Q
C j .
> > ° E
Cg
o O
a
Viglammmm
C'
4 m w Y
ulla�6E0
O 0 U
> Tw >.
N
II •E S V 2
2
C a
Q O N
U L N V N
r
N
O
l0 O
C M
> a N
0 _ o
aa)
ca w
� 0
L N
N L
Z
^'
"
N
J
00
O
fA
N
O
a
0
0
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
p
Cn
pO
O
O
pO
O
pO
O
pO
O
pO
O
pO
O
pO
pO
pO
pO
Iff
rn
m
ui
I.
rn
O
C',
�
ai
O
O
�
O
�
O
Si
°D
d9
J
d
0
0
p
O
p
O
p
O
oo
O
p
O
p
p
pp
p
pp
p
8p
0
0
0
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
y a
O
0
O
0
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
a
O
w
m
N
Cl
N
O
o
O
p
Qo
O
N
O
o
p
0000
p
p
p
pN
pCp�
p00
p00
p00
pOO
O
N
O
O
O
O
m
O
aO
d'
�
w
p
l'O
N
p�
p�
p
Op
p
p
p
Op
S
pOp
p6
8
g
pOpp
00
pOpp
00
N00
�-+
Oa
�O
O
�
EH
FA
fA
d9
po
O00
po
po
O
oo
O
pO
O
po
O
pO
O
pO
O
ow
OO
N
pS
O
O
pO
O
pO
O
O
O
O
O
8
C07
N
O
O
�Op
f0
E09
��Opp
E9
fA
V?
�
N
fA
fA
EA
fA
d9
y
pO
pO
pO
pO
pO
pO
pO
pO
pO
pO
pO
O
p
�
CEO;
O
p
C
O
p
00
O
o
00
O
p
00
O
p
00
O
p
O
p
C
O
p
C
O
p
C
O
p
C
p
00
o
p
00
0
w
�
Z
Z
Z
Z
�
����
�2
Z
Z
N
co
h
N
m
�
m
m
m
O
O
L
O
N
'X
�
�
Of
O
6
N
cg
�
�
rn
�
Q
a
nx
9 r
D
�
�
�nX
W
�nx
W
Lb
W
�ax
it
W
W
J
O
Kent School District
Capital Facilities
plan
2016-2019 - 2023-2024
KENT
SCHOOL
DISTRICT
Apri12018
Kent School District
SIX - YEAR CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2018-2019 - 2023-2024
May 2018
Kent School District No. 415
12033 SE 2561h Street
Kent, Washington 98030-6643
(253) 373-7295
[SENT
4I_I-I0'01.I
C11� � F6CC�
BOARD of DIRECTORS
Ms. Maya Vengadasalam, President
Ms. Deborah Straus, Vice President
Mr. Ross Hardy, Legislative Representative
Ms. Karen DeBruler, Director
Ms. Denise Daniels, Director
ADMINISTRATION
Dr. Calvin J. Watts
Superintendent of Schools
Mr. Benjamin Rarick, Executive Director of Fiscal Services
Mr. Fred Long, Executive Director of Facilities Services
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2018
Ke.ut School District-
Sk-Tear Capital Facilities Plan
Ta6Ce of Contents
Section
Page Number
I
Executive Summary
2
11
Six -Year Enrollment Projection & History
4
III
District Standard of Service
9
I V
Inventory, Capacity & Maps of Existing Schools
12
V
Six -Year Planning & Construction Plan — Site Map
17
V I
Portable Classrooms
20
V I I
Projected Classroom Capacity
21
V I I I
Finance Plan, Cost Basis and Impact Fee Schedules
26
I X
Summary of Changes to Previous Plan
33
X
Appendixes
35
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2018
1
Executive Summary
This Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") has been prepared by the Kent
School District (the "District") as the organization's capital facilities planning
document, in compliance with the requirements of Washington's Growth
Management Act, King County Code K.C.C. 21A.43 and Cities of Kent, Covington,
Renton, Auburn, Black Diamond, Maple Valley, and SeaTac. This annual Plan
update was prepared using data available in the spring of 2018 for the 2018-2019
school year.
This Plan is consistent with prior long-term capital facilities plans adopted by the
Kent School District. This Plan is not intended to be the sole planning document
for all of the District's needs. The District may prepare interim and periodic Long
Range Capital Facilities Plans consistent with Board Policies, taking into account
a longer or shorter time period, other factors and trends in the use of facilities, and
other needs of the District as may be required.
Prior Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent School District have been adopted by
Metropolitan King County Council and Cities of Kent, Covington, Auburn and
Renton and included in the Capital Facilities Plan element of the Comprehensive
Plans of each jurisdiction. This Plan has also been submitted to cities of Black
Diamond, Maple Valley, and SeaTac for their information and inclusion in their
Comprehensive Plans.
In order for impact fees to be collected in the unincorporated areas of Kent School
District, the Metropolitan King County Council must adopt this Plan and a fee -
implementing ordinance for the District. For impact fees to be collected in the
incorporated portions of the District, the cities of Kent, Covington, Renton and
Auburn must also adopt this Plan and their own school impact fee ordinances.
This Capital Facilities Plan establishes a standard of service in order to ascertain
current and future capacity. While the State Superintendent of Public Instruction
establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, those guidelines do not
account for local program needs in the District. The Growth Management Act, King
County and City codes and ordinances authorize the District to make adjustments
to the standard of service based on specific needs for students of the District.
This Plan includes the standard of service as established by Kent School District.
Program capacity is based on an average capacity and updated to reflect changes
to special programs served in each building. Portables in the capacity calculation
use the same standard of service as the permanent facilities.
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2018
The capacity of each school in the District is calculated based on the District's
standard of service and the existing inventory of permanent facilities. The District's
program capacity of permanent facilities reflects program changes and the state's
mandated reduction of class size to meet the standard of service for Kent School
District. Portables provide additional transitional capacity.
Kent School District is the fifth largest (fte basis) district in the state. Enrollment is
electronically reported monthly to the Office of the Superintendent of Public
Instruction ("OSPI") on Form P-223. Although funding apportionment is based on
Annual Average Full Time Equivalent (AAFTE), enrollment on October 1 is a widely
recognized "snapshot in time" that is used to report the District's enrollment for the
year as reported to OSPI.
The District received authorization from the Office of Superintendent of Public
Instruction to temporarily re -open the former Kent Elementary School at 317 Fourth
Ave South in Kent. This facility will be used to house the kindergarten and early
child education classes for both Kent and Neely -O'Brien Elementary Schools to
alleviate overcrowding at those schools. This building re -opened in fall 2014 as the
Kent Valley Early Learning Center.
The District's standard of service, enrollment history and projections, and use of
transitional facilities are reviewed in detail in various sections of this Plan. The
District plans to continue to satisfy concurrency requirements through the
transitional use of portables.
A financing plan is included in Section VIII which demonstrates the District's ability
to implement this Plan. Pursuant to the requirements of the Growth Management
Act, this Plan will be updated annually with changes in the impact fee schedules
adjusted accordingly.
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2018
9
I I Six - Year Enrollment Projection
For capital facilities planning, enrollment growth projections are based on cohort
survival and student yield from documented residential construction projected over
the next six years. (see Table Z page 8 and map page 37). The student generation factor is the
basis for the growth projections from new developments. (see Page 5)
King County live births and the District's relational percentage average were used
to determine the number of kindergartners entering the system. (See Table 1, page 7)
8.19% of 25,032 King County live births in 2012 is projected for 2,050 students
expected in Kindergarten for October 1, 2017. This is an increase of 402 live births
in King County over the previous year. (See rable2,page 8)
Early Childhood Education students (also identified as "ECE"), "Early Childhood
Special Education ("ECSE") students are forecast and reported to OSPI separately
on Form P-223H for Special Education Enrollment. Capacity is reserved to serve
students in the ECE programs at elementary schools.
The first grade population of Kent School District is traditionally 1-3% larger than
the kindergarten population due to growth and transfers to the District. Cohort
survival method uses historical enrollment data to forecast the number of students
projected for the following year. Projections for October 1, 2017-2022 are from
OSPI Report 1049 — Determination of Projected Enrollments.
Within practical limits, the District has kept abreast of proposed developments.
The District will continue to track new development activity to determine impact to
schools. Information on new residential developments and the completion of these
proposed developments in all jurisdictions will be considered in the District's future
analysis of growth projections. (seemappage37)
The Kent School District serves eight permitting jurisdictions: unincorporated
King County, the cities of Kent, Covington, Renton, and Auburn and smaller
portions of the cities of SeaTac, Black Diamond, and Maple Valley
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2018
STUDENT GENERATION FACTOR
"Student Factor" is defined by King County code as "the number derived by a
school district to describe how many students of each grade span are expected to
be generated by a dwelling unit" based on district records of average actual student
generated rates for developments completed within the last ten years.
Following these guidelines, the student generation rate for Kent School District is
as follows:
Single Family Elementary .398
Middle School .096
Senior High .185
Total .679
Multi -Family Elementary .117
Middle School .028
Senior High .029
Total .174
The student generation factor is based on a survey of 2,757 single-family dwelling
units and 1,831 multi -family dwelling units with no adjustment for occupancy rates.
Please refer to Appendix D on Page 37 of the Capital Facilities Plan for details of
the Student Generation Factor survey.
In preparing the 2017-2018 to 2022-2023 Capital Facilities Plan the District
contracted with Davis Demographics and Planning (DDP) of Riverside California,
a noted expert in demographic studies for school districts, to analyze and prepare
the student generation factor. DDP used a larger sample of single family
residences than the district did in previous plans and included both "garden" and
"urban style" apartments in the calculation for multi -family residences.
Urban style apartments typically have four stories, a central lobby and entrance,
elevator access to all floors and have a central corridor with apartments on each
side. These apartments have little or no surface street parking, with parking located
beneath the building; retail may or may not be included with the building. If there
is retail it will generally be located on the first floor. These apartments seldom have
swimming pools and do not have playgrounds for children.
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2018
Garden style apartments will have very little studio apartments and will have more
three bedroom apartments then the urban style and in theory generate more
students enrolled in school. These apartments will also have lawns, club houses,
swimming pools and places for children to play.
The District felt that it is important to include both styles of apartments for the
student generation factor. Though it is anticipated that few students will come from
the urban style, they are now part of the mix in Kent and thus should be included
in mix of multi -family housing units.
Within the district's boarders there are several low-income and multi -family
housing projects coming on-line during 2017-2018. Once developed and
occupancy occurring the District does recognize that the student generation for
multi -family housing will likely increase for future Capital Facilities Plan updates.
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2018
6
N
o
N
Cl)
o
I�
p
M
00
L'A
p
N
M
0
O
M
O
M
0
N
p
M
LO
I-
�t
00
N
It
O
00
N
r
N
Ln
o0
L7
c
c
O
p
v
O
O
O
r
N
r
r
m
O
O
O
00
00
c•�
2
c
o
m
N
N
a0
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
r
N
N
N
r
r
N
p
E
v
J
U
7
CO
o
o
Cl)
r-
Cl)
LO
LO
Cl)
N
Ln
M
LO
O
O
CU
a
y
w
w
N
M m
I-
r
(D
(D
0)
0)
O
LO
N
N
CD
c9
co
LQr
t`
No
m
at
c
p
O
O
r
r
r
r
0)
O
O
r
O
00
1-
M
i
0
m
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
r
N
N
N
N
r-
N
`m
c
n
LL
O
U)
T
- 6
O
N
L()
�.,�
o
M
O
O
O
a0
V
O
M
U.)
w
N
N
fV
rn
p
O
Ln �t
d'
V
M
(0
I`
w
LO
LO
I-
O
O
CO
V
a,
-0
c
O
M
O
r
O
O
O
O
-
O
M
r
Na
Co
C
N
(n
m
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
•--
N
r
N
N
N
r
N
_
_ N
2
J
Y
—
0
L
U
O'
o
L j
o
O
Il-
O
O
(0
O
M
V'
00
N
(0
N
r
CO
>@
wpm,
N
O m
IT
0)
N_
0)
I-
LO
r
N
O
0)
N
LO
O
h
o
CD
CD
Co c
Z
c
O
M
O
-
O
O
r
O
.-
O
V'
fb
tO
c
W
m
N
N
00
N
N
N
N
r
N
N
N
N
N
N
r
r
N
j
a
r
m 'c
J
LL
a)
L6
0 c
M
J o
N
o
0)
(0
Lo
N
I-
00
0)
(fl
()
(D
M
0)
N
CL
a
2 of
v
0
N
N M
O
r
Lb
LO
N
00
O
I�
V
N
O
Nr
I-
M
LO
CO
r-
m
7
c
X >
C
p
LO M
'It
O
0)
O
O
O
O
V
O
00
V)
v,
NCO
Y
p
m
N
N
tb
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
U
c N
N
OIds
(a
La CD
NCY)
Z o
o
o
�
T
U
@
tT
O
W
Ln
Cl)
I-
�-
LO
O
N
co
O
O
V
4
(0
N
0)
(o
O
co
LO
LO
N
0)
M
()
(0
v
c
c
"O U
c
O
co
co
tO
O
O
O
O
O
O
v
O
0)
(fl
(0
c�
N
m
O
c rn
V
m
N
N
00
N
N
r
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
r
N
a
c
Z
N
O 7
r
D O
'Y
o
Cl)
w
(O
Cl)
V'
It
LO
Ln
N
LO
Oo
U
LU
M
U N
N
N (D
L
W
00
00
00
N
I-
CO
O
I-
h
0)
LL)
(p
Ln
Lp
0
OOL
7 ,O
O
O
LOO
N
N
N
N
N
c
m
N
v
(�
N
N
N
N
p
c
m
J
N
U
U
.(Na O
O
N
J Q o
00
o
o
LO
(0
N
N
(0
(O
LO
LO
(M
O
00
O
V
N
N
W
'N
(O rn
M
V
O
V
O
LO
m
m
m
to
V'
M
IT
O
O
c')
O
O
CL
Ln 0
O
5
O
r
00
O
O
O
m
O
O
V
N
O
(O
N
>"
U
�7 7
O=
m
N
N
r
r
r
N
r
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Lc)
�
N
LO w
y T
C
0
c
G7
U T o
V
o
to
O
r
N
t0
I�
(7
N
1�
CO
N
O
O
V% LO
N
O
Cl)
Cl)
O
(O
(D
I-
LO
O
r
r
t`
r
V'
,
ti
r
U
O
r) 7
N
c
O
v
M
O
O
O
0)
O
O
O
�-
V
N
O
I�
(D
LT
u
N c
cV c
m
N
N
p
r
r
r
r
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
r
N
c
U
T
J
Y
0_ O
N
O
W
0
00
o
m
00
I-
(fl
O
N
N
00
0)
00
0)
00
t
Y
m
Y O
N
O
V
r-
O
N
00
(0
LO
O0
N
IT
r-
V
LO
V
Oo
O
O
r
li
c
O
�j N
t
0')
0)
0)
O
O
O
O
r
LO
N
O
(0
L)
c
O 0_
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
-
Wm
06
=
@
N
CL
N
LL
L)
U)
U) O
O
C
vl
N
_
L
r
V-
!U
(Nu
N N
o
L
lT
LU
N
.�..
m
E
r
N
ML1J
W
d
>
O`
m
O
m
m
(`6)
"O
2
r o
J
C
p
O)
w
o
c
c
U
C (U
N
d
O (V
(1 m
O
II
w
N
m
a)
__
CO
E
O
C
_
U
m
2
J
w m
N
r
N
M
d'
LO
m
i--
00
O`
0 m
E
0
0
�
rr
a)
'c
�
I1J
E
o
c
rn
a)
a)
a)
a)
a)
a)
a)
a)
a)
a)
a)
w
= m
�
�
c0
a
o
a
a
s
-a
-0o
70
70
-a
6
>
2
o w
LI
O
LT
a
m
m
m
m
m
(a
m
m
La
m
m
m
o
—
E
•�
@
LLI :..
Y
Y
Y
C)
U
U
CD
U
U
CD
U
U`
C7
(7
CD
~
>-
U
~
_
N
m
a
U
L
LL
R
.Q
l9
U
m
Lu
}
X_
U)
U
_N
O
O
L
O
C
Y
7
KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415
SIX -YEAR ENROLLMENT PROJECTION
Full Dav Kinderaarten at all Elem LB in 2012 LB in 2013 LB in 2014 LB in 2015 LB Est. 2015 LB Est. 2017 LB Est. 2018
ACTUAL
P R O J E C T 1 0 N
October
2017
1 2018
12019
2020
11 2021
2022
2023
King County Live Births'
25,032
24,910
25,348
25,487
26,011
26,011
26,011
Increase / Decrease
402
-122
438
139
524
0
0
Kindergarten / Birth % 2
8.14%
8.17%
8.07%
8.01%
7.84%
7.82%
7.80%
FD Kindergarten @ 1.0
2037
2,036
2,046
2,042
2,038
2,034
2,030
Grade 1
2056
2,065
2,081
2,077
2,073
2,069
2,065
Grade 2
2077
2,084
2,068
2,107
2,103
2,098
2,094
Grade 3
2143
2,093
2,116
2,092
2,131
2,127
2,122
Grade 4
2218
2,173
2,208
2,135
2,111
2,150
2,146
Grade 5
2189
2,228
2,230
2,223
2,150
2,126
2,165
Grade 6
2119
2,191
2,219
2,239
2,232
2,159
2,135
Grade 7
1922
2,120
2,104
2,210
2,230
2,223
2,151
Grade 8
2043
1,945
1,964
2,125
2,233
2,253
2,246
Grade 9
2006
2,134
2,236
2,150
2,326
2,445
2,467
Grade 10
2080
2,097
1,966
1,985
1,909
2,065
2,171
Grade 11
1823
1,929
1,620
1,704
1,720
1,655
1,790
Grade 12
1810
1,870
1,594
1,420
1,493
1,507
1,450
Total Enrollment Projection 3
26,523
26,965
26,452
26,509
26,749
26,911
27,032
Yearly Increase/Decrease 3
-6
442
-513
57
240
162
121
Yearly Increase/Decrease %
1.67%
-1.90%
0.22%
0.91 %
0.61 %
0.45%
Total Enrollment Projection 1 26,523 1 26,965 26,452 26,509 26,749 26,911 27,032
1 Kindergarten enrollment projection for 2018 is based on Kent SD percentage of live births in King County five years previous.
Live births for King County are estimates for years 2022-2023.
2 Kindergarten projection is calculated by using the District's previous year percentage of King County births five years earlier
compared to actual kindergarten enrollment in the previous year. (Excludes ECSE - Early Childhood Special Education preschoolers
3 Headcount Projections for 2019 - 2023 from OSPI Report 1049 - Determination of Projected Enrollments
4 Oct. 2017 P223 Headcount is 26,523 & FTE 26,113.47. Full Headcount with ECE Preschool & Running Start students = 28,192
G R O W T H P R O J E C T I O N S - Adjustments for current economic factors
For facilities planning purposes, this six -year enrollment projection anticipates conservative enrollment
growth from new development currently in some phase of planning or construction in the district.
April 2018
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 2
8
I I I Current Kent School District "Standard of Service"
In order to determine the capacity of facilities in a school district, King County Code
21A.06 references a "standard of service" that each school district must establish
in order to ascertain its overall capacity. The standard of service identifies the
program year, the class size, the number of classrooms, students and programs
of special need, and other factors determined by the district which would best serve
the student population.
This Plan includes the standard of service as established by Kent School District.
The District has identified schools with significant special needs programs as
"impact" schools and the standard of service targets a lower class size at those
facilities. Portables included in the capacity calculation use the same standard of
service as the permanent facilities. (See Appendix A, 8 & C)
The standard of service defined herein will continue to evolve in the future. Kent
School District is continuing a long-term strategic planning process combined with
review of changes to capacity and standard of service. This process will affect
various aspects of the District's standard of service and future changes will be
reflected in future capital facilities plans.
Current Standards of Service for Elementary Students
Class size for Kindergarten is planned for an average of 23 or fewer students.
Class size for grades 1 - 3 is planned for an average of 23 or fewer students.
Class size for grades 4 - 6 is planned for an average of 27 or fewer students.
Class size for Kindergarten and grades 1, 2 and 3 for schools that qualify for high
poverty funding (14 elementary schools for 2017-18) is planned for an average of
17 or fewer students. The state legislature has provided a one year delay in
compliance with the requirement to have class sizes of 17 or smaller for grades K-
3.
Some special programs require specialized classroom space and the program
capacity of some of the buildings housing these programs is reduced. Some
students, for example, leave their regular classroom for a short period of time to
receive instruction in special programs and space must be allocated to serve these
programs.
Some students have scheduled time in a computer lab. Students may also be
provided music instruction and physical education in a separate classroom or
facility.
Some identified students will also be provided educational opportunities in
classrooms for special programs such as those designated as follows:
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2018
9
English Language Learners (E L L)
Education for Disadvantaged Students (Title I) — Federal Program
Learning Assisted Programs (LAP) — State Program
Highly Capable Students -State Program
Reading, Math or Science Labs
Dual Language Programs in 4 elementary schools
Inclusive Education Service for Elementary and Secondary students with
disabilities may be provided in a separate or self-contained classroom sometimes
with a capacity of 10-15 depending on the program:
Early Childhood Special Education (ECSE) -3-4 yr. old students with
disabilities
Tiered Intervention in Inclusive Education Support Center Programs
Integrated Programs & Resource Rooms (for special remedial assistance)
Self-contained Inclusive Education Support Center Programs (SC)
School Adjustment Programs for students with behavioral disorders (SA)
Adaptive Support Center for Mild, Moderate & Severe Disabilities (ASCDD)
Speech & Language Therapy & Programs for Hearing Impaired students
Occupational & Physical Therapy Programs (OT/PT)
The Outreach Program (TOP) for 18-21 year old secondary students
Some newer buildings have been constructed to accommodate most of these
programs; some older buildings have been modified, and in some circumstances,
these modifications reduce the classroom capacity of the buildings. When
programs change, program capacity is updated to reflect the change in program
and capacity.
Current Standards of Service for Secondary Students
The standards of service outlined below reflect only those programs and
educational opportunities provided to secondary students which directly affect the
capacity of the school buildings.
Class size for grades 7 — 8 is planned for an average of 28.6 or fewer students.
Class size for grades 9 — 12 is planned for an average of 30.6 or fewer students.
Similar to Inclusive Education Programs listed above, many other secondary
programs require specialized classroom space which can reduce the program
capacity of the permanent school buildings.
Identified secondary students will also be provided other educational opportunities
in classrooms for programs designated as follows:
Computer, Multi -Media & Technology Labs & Programs
Technology Academy at Kent -Meridian High School & Mill Creek Middle School
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2018
10
Science Programs & Labs — Biology, Chemistry, Physics, Oceanography,
Astronomy, Meteorology, Marine Biology, General Science, etc.
English Language Learners (E L L)
Music Programs — Band, Orchestra, Chorus, Jazz Band, etc.
Art Programs — Painting, Design, Drawing, Ceramics, Pottery, Photography, etc.
Theater Arts — Drama, Stage Tech, etc.
Journalism and Yearbook Classes
Highly Capable (Honors or Gifted) and Advanced Placement Programs
International Baccalaureate ("IB") Program
JROTC - Junior Reserve Officers Training Corps
Career & Technical Education Programs (CTE - Vocational Education)
Family & Consumer Science — Culinary Arts, Sewing, Careers
w/Children/Educ., etc.
Child Development Preschool and Daycare Programs
Health & Human Services — Sports Medicine, Sign Language,
Cosmetology, etc.
Business Education — Word Processing, Accounting, Business Law &
Math, Marketing, Economics, Web Design, DECA, FBLA (Future
Business Leaders).
Technical & Industry —Woodworking, Cabinet Making, Building
Trades, Metals, Automotive & Manufacturing Technology, Welding,
Drafting, Drawing, CAD (Computer -aided Design), Electronics,
Engineering & Design, Aviation, ASL, etc.
Graphic & Commercial Arts, Media, Photography, Theater & Stage, Ag
& Horticulture.
Kent Phoenix Academy- Performance Learning Center, Gateway, Virtual High
School and Kent Success programs
Space or Classroom Utilization
As a result of scheduling conflicts for student programs, the need for specialized
rooms for certain programs, and the need for teachers to have a work space during
their planning periods, it is not possible to achieve 100% utilization of regular
teaching stations at secondary schools. Based on the analysis of actual utilization
of classrooms, the District has determined that the standard utilization rate is 85%
for secondary schools. Program capacity at elementary schools reflects 100%
utilization at the elementary level.
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2018
11
I V Inventory and Capacity of Existing Schools
Currently, the District has permanent program capacity to house 27,103 students
and transitional (portable) capacity to house 2,085. This capacity is based on the
District's Standard of Service as set forth in Section I 11. Included in this Plan is an
inventory of the District's schools by type, address and current capacity. (See
Table 3 on Page 13). The ratio between permanent capacity and portable capacity
is 94.9%-5.1 %.
The program capacity is periodically updated for changes in programs, additional
classrooms and new schools. Program capacity has been updated in this Plan to
reflect program changes implemented in the Fall of 2015.
For the 2015-2016 school year and beyond the state has a mandated lower class
size in 14 elementary schools that are classified as high poverty. The new class
size in grades K-1, 2 and 3 will be 17 students for every teacher. Compliance with
this new state class size requirement has been delayed to the 2019-20 school
year.
Calculation of Elementary, Middle School and Senior High School capacities are
set forth in Appendices A, B and C. Maps of existing schools are included on Pages
14-16.
For clarification, the following is a brief description of some of the non-traditional
programs for students in Kent School District:
Kent Mountain View Academy serves Grades 3 — 12 with transition, choice and
home school assistance programs. It is located in the former Grandview School in
the western part of the district in Des Moines. This school was originally designed
as an elementary school and is included in the elementary capacity for this Plan.
Kent Phoenix Academy is a non-traditional high school opened in fall 2007 in the
renovated site and building that formerly served Sequoia Middle School. Kent
Phoenix Academy has four special programs including the Performance Learning
Center, Gateway, Virtual High School and Kent Success.
iGrad - In partnership with Green River College, Kent School District has pioneered
the Individualized Graduation and Degree Program or "iGrad". iGrad offers a
second chance to students age 16-21 who have dropped out of high school and
want to earn a high school diploma. iGrad is not included in this Capital Facilities
Plan because it is served in leased space at the Kent Hill Plaza Shopping Center.
Over the past three years, enrollment in the iGrad program has averaged over 300
students.
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2018
KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No.415
INVENTORY and CAPACITY of EXISTING SCHOOLS
SCHOOL Year ABR ADDRESS
Opened
2017-18
Program
Capacity
Carriage Crest Elementary
1990
CC
18235 - 140th Avenue SE, Renton 98058
428
Cedar Valley Elementary
1971
CV
26500 Timberlane Way SE, Covington 98042
360
Covington Elementary
1961
CO
17070 SE Wax Road, Covington 98042
478
Crestwood Elementary
1980
CW
25225 - 180th Avenue SE, Covington 98042
408
East Hill Elementary
1953
EH
9825 S 240th Street, Kent 98031
464
Emerald Park
1999
EP
11800 SE 216th Street, Kent 98031
477
Fairwood Elementary
1969
FW
16600 - 148th Avenue SE, Renton 98058
386
George T. Daniel Elementary
1992
DE
11310 SE 248th Street, Kent 98030
432
Glenridge Elementary
1996
GR
19405 - 120th Avenue SE, Renton 98058
431
Grass Lake Elementary
1971
GL
28700 - 191 st Place SE, Kent 98042
428
Horizon Elementary
1990
HE
27641 - 144th Avenue SE, Kent 98042
477
Jenkins Creek Elementary
1987
JC
26915 - 186th Avenue SE, Covington 98042
384
Kent Elementary
1999
KE
24700 - 64th Avenue South, Kent 98032
454
Kent Valley Early Learning Center
2014
KV
317 ---4th Ave S, Kent, WA 98032
318
Lake Youngs Elementary
1965
LY
19660 - 142nd Avenue SE, Kent 98042
497
Martin Sortun Elementary
1987
MS
12711 SE 248th Street, Kent 98030
455
Meadow Ridge Elementary
1994
MR
27710 - 108th Avenue SE, Kent 98030
454
Meridian Elementary
1939
ME
25621 - 140th Avenue SE, Kent 98042
497
Millennium Elementary
2000
ML
11919 SE 270th Street, Kent 98030
478
Neely -O'Brien Elementary
1990
NO
6300 South 236th Street, Kent 98032
454
Panther Lake Elementary
2009
PL
20831 - 108th Avenue SE, Kent 98031
497
Park Orchard Elementary
1963
PO
11010 SE 232nd Street, Kent 98031
463
Pine Tree Elementary
1967
PT
27825 - 118th Avenue SE, Kent 98030
487
Ridgewood Elementary
1987
RW
18030 - 162nd Place SE, Renton 98058
477
Sawyer Woods Elementary
1994
SW
31135 - 228th Ave SE, Black Diamond 98010
477
Scenic Hill Elementary
1960
SH
26025 Woodland Way South, Kent 98030
454
Soos Creek Elementary
1971
SC
12651 SE 218th Place, Kent 98031
360
Springbrook Elementary
1969
SB
20035 - 100th Avenue SE, Kent 98031
396
Sunrise Elementary
1992
SR
22300 - 132nd Avenue SE, Kent 98042
477
Elementary TOTAL 12,848
Cedar Heights Middle School
1993
CH
19640 SE 272 Street, Covington 98042
895
Mattson Middle School
1981
MA
16400 SE 251st Street, Covington 98042
787
Meeker Middle School
1970
MK
12600 SE 192nd Street, Renton 98058
832
Meridian Middle School
1958
MM
23480 - 120th Avenue SE, Kent 98031
792
Mill Creek Middle School
2005
MC
620 North Central Avenue, Kent 98032
916
Northwood Middle School
1996
NW
17007 SE 184th Street, Renton 98058
926
Middle School TOTAL 5,148
Kent -Meridian High School
1951 KM 10020 SE 256th Street, Kent 98030
1,904
Kentlake Senior High School
1997 KL 21401 SE 300th Street, Kent 98042
1,957
Kentridge Senior High School
1968 KR 12430 SE 208th Street, Kent 98031
2,277
Kentwood Senior High School
1981 KW 25800 - 164th Avenue SE, Covington 98042
2,159
Senior High TOTAL 8,297
Kent Mountain View Academy 1997 MV/LC 22420 Military Road, Des Moines 98198 396
Kent Phoenix Academy 2007 PH 11000 SE 264th Street, Kent 98030 414
DISTRICT TOTAL 1 27,103
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Tablg 3 April 2018
Kent School District Fall 2016/17 Demographic Report
N
O
O
D > A
O m >
1 z m
m y
5 0 x
Z D x
� �
o x -D
_2
F N o
p> m
z r O
N O
m
m K m
y
y
y
N M
m
Cr
m
M
s
N
x m
D
N O
p O
O O
O z
O O
N
m m
r.
m m
y
z
m
C.
x
r
y
>
=m
> x
� m
m o O
m
z
D
zN
O y
C m x
O Z
3 y p
m M
C1
y
N m
m
N
= m
m y
y
D A v>
O m
D m
F z M
m m a
`<
= c
x
f O m
x x m O
=
O m
p
s
O m y
D m
x x z
o y
c m m
MC;
m
y
y y
N
C
z
N N y
9 O O
x O m
Z y z
y
m
C7 O O
CO x
N
T
m —
O m
O x
x m m
m N y
y
April 19, 2017
14
Kent School District Fall 2016/17 Demographic Report
J,
Z
O
3 3
p m
3 3 0
m y m
N
z
o
m
m
g
Q
N
O
m
G
O
z 3
ai 3
m
3
V7
CI)O
W
-
3
y O
LI
rri
m
p
vn)�f�
........�
N
E
in
v.�,u.Vi
w •C ^. D
�,•,,..q
L
_
' •iJ
�Z
April 19, 2017 -
15
Kent School District Fall 2016/17 Demographic Report
rn
M M
M
CA
C)
z
z z
z
0
--I -1
E 1
0 >
7z
-1
3
M
0
0
0 M
M
>
U)
CI)
z
Cf)
.3 P,
C)
T, 7
CD
P
Cj ;7,
z
April 19, 2017
im
V Six -Year Planning and Construction Plan
In November 2017, the voters of the Kent School District approved a bond
measure for $252 million. This new bonding authority will provide for a
replacement for Covington Elementary school (with increased capacity due to
growth), a new elementary school in the Kent Valley (site to be determined),
twenty additional classrooms throughout the district as well as other
infrastructure projects.
At the time of preparation of this Plan in spring of 2017, the following projects to
increase capacity either are in the planning phase or will start in spring 2017.
• Planning is complete for a replacement school for Covington Elementary School
in first quarter of 2019. The project will start in spring of 2017 with planned
completion in fall 2018.The project is funded with a combination of bond funds
(bonds issued in February 2017), state assistance and impact fees.
• Planning is in progress for an additional elementary school in the Kent Valley in
2020 or beyond. The project will be funded with bonds funds and impact fees.
• Planning is in progress to add an additional 20 classrooms to elementary
schools. The locations will be determined by need. The project will be funded
with bonds funds and impact fees.
• Enrollment projections reflect future need for additional capacity at the
elementary school level. Future facility and site needs are reflected in this Plan.
• Some funding for lease or purchase of additional portables may be provided by
impact fees as needed. Sites are based on need for additional capacity.
As a critical component of capital facilities planning, county and city planners and
decision -makers are encouraged to consider safe walking conditions for all
students when reviewing applications and design plans for new roads and
developments. This should include sidewalks for pedestrian safety to and from
school and bus stops as well as bus pull-outs and turn-arounds for school buses.
Included in this Plan is an inventory of potential projects and sites identified by the
District which are potentially acceptable site alternatives in the future. (See Table a on
Page 18 & Site map on Page 19).
Voter approved bond issues have included funding for the purchase of sites for
some of these and future schools, and the sites acquired to date are included in
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2018
17
KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No.415
Site Acquisitions and Projects Planned to Provide Additional Capacity
SCHOOL / FACILITY / SITE LOCATION Type I Status
Map I ELEMENTARY
Map
Projected
Projected
% for
Completion
Program
new
Date
Capacity
Growth
Replacement construction
5 Replacement for Covington Elementary SE 256th Street & 154th Ave SE Elementary in Progress Fall 2018 630 24%
Covington Elem - Capacity to be replaced 9/18 17070 SE Wax Road, Covington Elementary Utilized -478
Elementary
New Elementary School Kent Valley Addition Planning 2020-2021 600 100%
Elementary
20 Additional Permanent Classrooms Various schools where needed Addition Planning 2019-2022 480 100%
MIDDLE SCHOOL & SENIOR HIGH
No new projects required for Secondary Schools at this time & Secondary Schools are excluded from Impact Fee formula.
TEMPORARY FACILITIES Additional
Capacity
PortablesTBD - For placement as needed New Planning 2018+ 24-31 each 100%
# on
y
OTHER SITES ACQUIRED
Land Use
I I
Land Use
Map
Designation
Type
Jurisdiction
4
Covington area North (Near Mattson MS)
SE 251 & 164 SE, Covington 98042
Urban
Elementary
City of Covington
5
Covington area West (Halleson-Wikstrom)
SE 256 & 154 SE, Covington 98042
Urban
Elementary
City of Covington
3
Ham Lake area (Pollard)
16820 SE 240, Kent 98042
Rural
Elementary
King County
8
SE of Lake Morton area (West property)
SE 332 & 204 SE, Kent 98042
Rural
Secondary
King County
2
Shady Lk area (Sowers, Blaine, Drahota, Paroline)
17426 SE 192 Street, Renton 98058
Urban
Elementary
King County
12
South Central site (Yeh-Wms)
SE 286th St & 124th Ave SE, Auburn 98092
Urban
TBD
King County
Notes:
' TBD - To be determined - Some sites are identified but placement, timing and/or configuration of portables has not been determined.
2 Numbers correspond to sites on Site Bank Map on Page 19. Other Map site locations are parcels identified in Table 7 on Page 29.
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 4 April 2018
18
�
Gil
eon
�
s
E§
-RE
0
cr
!!
k§!§
© &
33�
° R,A
! D
�k � �
J
| 4
�
��_
`
%
2
2 �
Rae eDISVI cts #CaptiFac A#P�n
q=_mm
2{
,!SE
�
j
k
)
;_mm
0�
Me
19
this Plan. Some funding is secured for purchase of additional sites but some may
be funded with impact fees as needed. Not all undeveloped properties meet
current school construction requirements and some property may be traded or sold
to meet future facility needs. The Board of Directors has started the process to sell
surplus property in the spring of 2015.
The Board will continue annual review of standard of service and those decisions
will be reflected in the each update of the Capital Facilities Plan.
V I Portable Classrooms
The Plan references use of portable as interim or transitional capacity and facilities.
Currently, the District utilizes portables to house students in excess of permanent
capacity and for program purposes at some school locations. (Please see Appendices A,
a, c )
Based on enrollment projections, implementation of full day kindergarten
programs, lower state mandated class size, program capacity and the need for
additional permanent capacity, the District anticipates the need to purchase or
lease additional portables during the next six -year period.
During the time period covered by this Plan, the District does not anticipate that all
of the District's portables will be replaced by permanent facilities. During the useful
life of some of the portables, the school -age population may decline in some
communities and increase in others, and these portables provide the flexibility to
accommodate the immediate needs of the community.
Portables may be used as interim or transitional facilities:
1. To prevent overbuilding or overcrowding of permanent school
facilities.
2. To cover the gap between the times of demand for increased
capacity and completion of permanent school facilities to meet
that demand.
3. To meet unique program requirements.
Portables currently in the District's inventory are continually evaluated resulting in
some being improved and some replaced.
The Plan projects that the District will use portables to accommodate interim
housing needs for the next six years and beyond. The use of portables, their
impacts on permanent facilities, life cycle and operational costs, and the
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2018
20
interrelationship between portables, emerging technologies and educational
restructuring will continue to be examined.
V I I Projected Six -Year Classroom Capacity
As stated in Section IV, the program capacity study is periodically updated for
changes in special programs and reflects class size requirements, class size
fluctuations etc. As shown in the Inventory and Capacity chart in Table 3 on Page
13, the program capacity is also reflected in the capacity and enrollment
comparison charts. (see Tables 5 & 5 A-B-C on pages 22-25).
Enrollment is electronically reported to OSPI on Form P-223 on a monthly basis
and funding apportionment is based on Annual Average FTE (AAFTE). The first
school day of October is widely recognized as the enrollment "snapshot in time" to
report enrollment for the year.
Kent School District continues to be the fifth largest district (both FTE and
headcount basis) in the state of Washington. Kent School District continues to be
the fifth largest district (both fte and headcount basis) in the state of Washington.
P-223 Headcount for October 2017 was 26,523 with kindergarten students
counted at 1.0 and excluding ECSE and college -only Running Start students. A
full headcount of all students enrolled in October 2017 totals 28,192, which include
ECSE and college -only Running Start students.
In October 2017, there were 1,118 students in 11th and 12th grade participating in
the Running Start program at different colleges and receiving credits toward both
high school and college graduation. Five hundred ninety-three of these students
attended classes only at the college ("college -only") and are excluded from FTE
and headcount for capacity and enrollment comparisons. Kent School District has
one of the highest Running Start program participation rates in the state.
Based on the enrollment forecasts, permanent facility inventory and capacity,
current standard of service, portable capacity, and future additional classroom
space, the District plans to continue to satisfy concurrency requirements through
the transitional use of portables. (see Table 5 and Tables 5 A-B-C on Pages 22-25).
This does not mean that some schools will not experience overcrowding. There
may be a need for additional portables and/or new schools to accommodate
growth within the District. New schools may be designed to accommodate
placement of future portables. School attendance area changes, limited and costly
movement of portables, zoning changes, market conditions, and educational
restructuring will all play a major role in addressing overcrowding and
underutilization of facilities in different parts of the District.
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2018
21
KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415
PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY
TOTAL DISTRICT
SCHOOL YEAR
2017-18
2018-19
1 2019-20
1 2020-21
1 2021-22
1 2022-23
Actual
P R O J E C T E D
Permanent Program Capacity27,103
Changes to Permanent Capacity
Capacity Increase (F)
Replacement school with projected increase in capacity:
Covington Elementary Replacement (u) 2
To Replace current Covington Elementary capacity
New Elementary School in Kent Valley3
Additional Permanent Classrooms
27,103 27,103 27,103 27,323 27,443
630
-478
600
120 120 120 120
Permanent Program Capacity Subtotal 27,103 27,103 27,375 27,223 28,043 27,563
Interim Portable Capacity 4
Elementary Portable Capacity Required 1,656 1,728 1,440 1,248 456 336
Middle School Portable Capacity Required 7 0 0 0 0 0 0
Senior High School Portable Capacity Required 7 0 0 0 0 0 0
1,656 1,728 1,440 1,248 456 336
TOTAL CAPACITY 28,759 1 28,831 1 28,815 1 28,471 1 28,499 27,899
TOTAL ENROLLMENT/ PROJECTION e 26,523 1 26,965 1 26,452 1 26,509 1 26,749 26,911
DISTRICT AVAILABLE CAPACITY' 2,236 1 1,866 1 2,363 1 1,962 1 1,750 1 988
t Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes.
2 Replacement school for Covington Elementary will increase capacity and will be built on a different existing urban site.
3 New Elementary School on site in Kent Valley to be determined.
4 2016-17 total classroom portable capacity is 1440. Some additional relocatable used for program purposes.
5 Actual October Headcount Enrollment with Projections from OSPI Report 1049 - Determination of Projected Enrollments.
6 School capacity meets concurrency requirements and no impact fees are proposed for secondary schools.
April 2018
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5
`l0:
KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415
PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY
ELEMENTARY - Grades K - 6
SCHOOL YEAR
2017-18 1
2018-19
2 119-20
1 2020-21
1 2021-22
1 2022-23
2023-24
Actual
P R O J E C T E D
Elementary Permanent Capacity' 13,244
Changes to Elementary Capacity
Covington Elementary Replacement (U) 3
Will replace current Covington Elementary capacity
New Elementary School in Kent Valley
Additional Permanent Classrooms4
13,244 13,244 13,516 13,636 14,356 14,476
630
-478
600
120 120 120 120 120
Subtotal 13,244
13,244
13,516
13,636
14,356
14,476
14,596
Portable Capacity Required' 1656
1728
1440
1248
456
336
336
TOTAL CAPACITY 112
14,900
14,972
14,956
14,884
14,812
14,812 1
14,932
Adjusted for FULL Day Kindergarten Headcount
ENROLLMENT / PROJECTION 5 14,910 14,968 14,915 14,838 14,763 14,757 1 14,757
SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY 1 -10 4 41 46 49 55 1 175
Number of Portables Required 69 72 60 52 19 14 14
1 Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes.
2 Kent Mountain View Academy is a special program serving students in Grades 3 - 12.
The school building (formerly Kent Learning Center & Grandview Elem.) was designed as an elementary school.
3 Replacement school for Covington Elementary will increase capacity and is planned for a different existing urban site.
4 Additional classrooms will be placed at schools with the greatest need for aleve overcrowding
5 Actual October Headcount Enrollment with Projections from OSPI Report 1049 - Determination of Projected Enrollments.
Enrollment & Projections reflect FULL Day Kindergarten at ALL Elementary schools @ 1.0 & exclude ECSE Preschoolers.
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 A April 2018
23
KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415
PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY
MIDDLE SCHOOL - Grades 7 - 8
SCHOOL YEAR
2017-18
2018-19
1 2019-20
1 2020-21
1 2021-22
1 2022-23
Actual
P R O J E C
T
Middle School Permanent Capacity' 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148
lNo Changes to Middle School Capacity
Subtotal 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148
Portable Capacity Required' 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL CAPACITY ' & 3 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 51148
ENROLLMENT / PROJECTION 2 1 3.986 4.068 4.335 4.463 4.476 4.397
SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY 1,162 1,080 813 685 672 751
Number of Portables Required 0 0 0 0 0 0
No Classroom Portables required at middle schools at this time. Some Portables used for classroom and program purposes.
1 Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program &
2 Actual October Headcount Enrollment with Projections from OSPI Report 1049 - Determination of Projected Eni
3 Surplus capacity due to grade level reconfiguration - All 9th grade students moved to the high schools in F
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 B April 2018
24
KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415
PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY
SENIOR HIGH - Grades 9 - 12
SCHOOL YEAR
2017-18
1 2018-19
1 2019-20
1 2020-21
1 2021-22
1 2022-23
Actual P R O J E C
T
Senior High Permanent Capacity' 8,711 8,711 8,711 8,711 8,711 8,711
Includes Kent Phoenix Academy 2
No Changes to High School Capacity
Subtotal b,11 1 b,111 t5, 111 b, / "I "I b, / "I "I b, / "I "I
Portables Capacity Required 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL CAPACITY' 8,711 8,711 8,711 8,711 8,711 8,711
ENROLLMENT / PROJECTION 3 I 7,536 7,416 7,259 7,448 7,672 7,878
SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY 1,175 1,295 1,452 1,263 1,039 833
Number of Portables Required 0 0 0 0 0 0
No Classroom Portables required at this time. Some Portables used for classroom and program purposes.
' Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program &
2 Kent Phoenix Academy opened in Fall 2007 serving grades 9 - 12 with four special programs.
3 Actual October Enrollment with Projections from OSPI Report 1049 - Determination of Projected Enrollments.
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 C April 2018
25
V I I I Finance Plan
The finance plan shown on Table 6 demonstrates how the Kent School District plans to
finance improvements for the years 2017-2018 through 2022-2023. The financing
components include secured and unsecured funding and impact fees. The plan is based
on future bond issues, state school construction assistance, collection of impact fees
under the State Growth Management Act and voluntary mitigation fees paid pursuant to
State Environmental Policy Act.
The plan calls for the replacement of Covington Elementary in 2018-19 which will increase
the capacity of the current school by approximately 20%. Some impact fees will be utilized
as part of the finance plan.
The plan also includes an additional elementary school in the Kent Valley and the siting
will be determined at a later date. The district does have two sites where the school could
be placed and a decision has not been made. This new school will increase the capacity
at the elementary level by 600 students. Some impact fees are scheduled to be part of the
overall finance plan.
To address overcrowding at our elementary schools, the plan also includes twenty
additional permanent classrooms at the schools of the greatest need. A decision as to the
placing of these classrooms has not been made. These classrooms will be at the schools
with the most overcrowding. Some impact fees are scheduled to be part of the overall
finance plan.
In November 2016, the District held a special election to approve the authorization of
$252,000,000 in bonding authority. The projects described above are part of this
authorization. The first series of bonds ($80 million) were issued in February 2017, which
will fund the replacement of Covington Elementary as well as other infrastructure projects.
The Finance Plan includes new portables to be purchased or leased to provide additional
capacity and some may be funded from impact fees.
Enrollment projections reflect future need for additional capacity at the elementary level
and unfunded facility needs will be reviewed in the future and reported in annual updates
of the Capital Facilities Plan. No impact fees are requested for secondary schools in this
Plan.
For the Six -Year Finance Plan, costs of future schools are based on estimates from Kent
School District Facilities Department. Please see pages 27-28 for a summary of the cost
basis.
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2018
26
V I I I Finance Plan - Cost Basis Summary
For impact fee calculations, construction costs are based on cost of the last
elementary school, adjusted for inflation, and projected cost of the future
elementary schools and additional classrooms.
Elementary School
Cost
Projected Cost
Cost of Panther Lake Elementary
Replacement (Opened in Fall 2009)
$26,700,000
Projected cost - Covington Elementary
Replacement (Projected to open in 2018)
$46,077,470
Projected cost of New Elementary School
Kent Valley (Projected to open in 2020)
$46,000,000
20 Additional permanent Classrooms
$16,829,000
Site Acquisition Cost
The site acquisition cost is based on an average cost of sites purchased or built
on within the last ten years. Please see Table 7 on page 29 for a list of site
acquisition costs and averages.
District Adjustment
The impact fee calculations on pages 31 and 32 include a "District Adjustment"
which is equal to the amount of increase that the impact fee formulas total for this
year and adjusted for the increase in the Consumer Price Index (2.6%) for the
Seattle metropolitan area.
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2018
27
LO
It
O Z
Z J
�a
U_
Q'
I-
0
O
O
x
U
U)
I—
Z
w
Y
O
O
O
O
O
O
o
O
O
o
LO
LO
O
o
O
o
r
�
O
O
'cY
LO
t0
r-
to
Cli
E
_
v3
N
- LL
LL
6%
V)
(i)
to
O
O
a U
N
a
O
O
O
O
UJ
O
O
`o
E
O
O
O
O
C: N
c d
CO
CD
� m
w
W
It
v3
v
v3
rn
O
a m
r`
CD2
co
v_
O
m
U
^
LO
V-
m
a) m
L)
n
O
ri
LO
O
M
69
2
fR
J
6q
ffi
O
O
O
O
O
O
C
J
Vi
O
O
n
N
Q
r-
o
o
rn
oo
LO
F
r
O
O
O
O
N
W
LO
N
t0
EA
tf)
Ef?
fA
m
cq
N
O
E
O
H9
7
N
U)
N
m
m
O
LO
O
N
LO
O
cq
O
CD
N
~O
0
uj
N
'-
N
....
C
d3
'IT
N
O
EA
N
y
N
Q)
U
O
O
LO
CD
a_
o
w
O
Nrl-
toN
N
O
N
o
a)O
O
N
O
CD N
C,
No
E
U
co
N
(
c
cn
a
w
E
o
E
a
m
CD
O
LO
@
0
T
E
N
O
OO
-00
O
W
O
r a
O
N
'N
N
O
O
o
m
M r
CD
(n
N
N
'Cc:
w
a
N
Y
V
M a
r
'U
„O.
O
m
fi>
W M
LO
m
c
O
a)N
b9
LL
.0
a
C
O
f0
E
2
T
m
m
0
0
I-
7
LO
N
O y
O N
O
�
o
",=
N
C
E
N
c
-
N
W
h
r
O
.)
O
U
`p
N
O
N
N o
V.
U
CD
p
•0
CO
V
a
C
O•
O
7
ER
b9
C
2
C
N
0
7
U
N
j
LL
L
N
m
r
LL
LL
LL
c
o
a
o
U
N
O
E
O
j
O
E
N
U)
"
E
O
3
N
co
C
w
�C
N
N
N
EO
N
'C...
w
v
O
01
C
U)
W
H
N
-
U
O
p
M
a
m
>
N
>
U
a
N
F
J
m
i
m
O
N
m
J
cn
N
O
N
0
0)
C
O
N
J
U
N
cu
C
.{i
m
N
U
U
N
l]
G
w
U
m
a
Q
LL
m
c
U
m
Q
m
Q
to
c
m
a�
N
m
Q
ani
Y
O
.N
o
Ll
o
0_
w
(B
N
a
Z
O
N
H
Z
O
~
II
Q
N
N
E
O
L
0
O
7
QO
c
cn
Q
E
m
m
U
U
a)L,
E
O
N
(n
Ll
_
=p
N
U
N
a0
N
W
m
C
w
U)
N
@
W
Q
CO
a:
C
L1
W
N
C
C
N
E
Z.
C
O
a
C
LL
m
LI
H
a)'U
N
N
CD
W
N
_0
N
H
m
FL-
LL
O
LL
3
E
Q
LL
O
N
V
N
UZ
Z
U
Z
W
N
z
m
H
fn
N
cU
m
LL
W
Q
m
U
`m
}
Ln
n
O
O
C
U
Cn
C
Y
28
Ln
T- S
O
Z 0 s
U U
F- to 0
0 O `
J UN ri
O'Sz
Q cr
V (
U Q
Z a
W
Y �
U
a
0
a
U
d
('')
d
d
m
co rn
°
OD 00
�'
�
a
m
Y
�
U
Y
Q
O
co
to
N
a
64
E
69
a
64
=
G
N
LO
w
LO
rn
r`
m
0
N
O
O
O
00
Cfl
Q
.--
M
CO
M
00
L()
U
w
p_
I--
Cl)
N
000
N
0
~
_O
N
69-
69
69
69-
O
U
01
a
co
0
O
O
O
CO
CO
O
O
0
M
O
L.n
CO
CO
O
O
N
v
O
Cn
CA
O
14
00
00
O
O
y
M
p.
LO
�
Cl)
O
Co
't
It
O
O
o
r•
N
00
It
U)
co
0
d'
d'
r•
U
It
CA
O
Cl)
00
00
00
CO
M
O
O
U
r•
0
ell
6q
M
M
N
.-
69
64
63
64
6)
m
ami
U
r•
61
a
m
O
O
O
0
V)
Cl)
M
r•
r•
m
0
CV
Q
W
CDcoN
r•
0
0
H
O
CV
•-
CO
m
m
m
0
N
O
O
O
W
o
w
U)U)
a
a
co
U)
U)
o
U
o
L...
U)d
U)
U)c
.co
C
O
Z
Y
0
O
a)
co
N
0
Co
L
N
2
c
Y
c
U
O
m
CA
U
o
O
m
N
c
o
J
co
Y
m
>
co
N
w
(D
co
N
L
N
m
U
N
w
w
c
w
U)
r
U)
a)
Y
N
m
(n
O
0
w
10
co
0
N
0
N
't
Cl
r
O
(n
N
'O
a)
O
O
{
cn
00
(O
N
N
m
7
N
m
l0
0)
m
L O
O
O
O
O
O
°6
2m
O
O
O
O
O)
N
N
N
N
N
N
a
m
tL
o
O
L
tL
N
O
O
a
L_
C
m
N
O)
o
y
m
_
0
`m
co
CO
U)E
r
CD
m
O
N
'�
o
c
a)
IL
w
yE
U)i
o(5
co
0
0
oQ
m
U
C
m
(O
_
Q
cT
U
N
O
.2
Q
O
L
m
0
o
E
N
Y
O
0
a
.6
m
N
m
W
U)
C
CD
Y
cu
O
00
(D
Q
U)
d
`°
o
m
n
C
>
a
\
.0
O
0'S
�,
m
�
U
0
m
N
�
'o
co
-
_
C
Q
a)
`a
m
L
m
a)
CO
r
(6
N
(n
L
m
�
0
t!U
N
N
=
w
�
d
c0
3
0
U
m
m
m
0
n
Z
'C
o
E
r`
_
o
0
c
�'
D
m
0
a)
Uj
N
0
>
O
m
a)
a>
N
(n
N
Y
Cl)
V
U)
aa)
L)
o.
o
Y
m
m
J
m
_
Y
ca
CoCn
o
p
m
m
J
J
J
m
Uj
Y
3
0
0-
E
o
a
N
c
a`mi
p)
=
En
a�
c
>
U
2
m
L
N
N
N
o
N
O
N
a)
a)
a)
a)
tL
C
a
C
W
C
a
O
O
C
CA
Y
C
5
_
a
o
U
in
C
in
U)
in
C
U)
C
Q
�t3 m
fl
o
9
U
a)
m
m
m
a
T�
o
Z
E
_
�
co
O
N
.n
a
cu
LL
:co
w
Q
m
U
`m
a)
U)
U
N
O
O
Cl)
Y
29
KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT
FACTORS FOR ESTIMATED IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS
Student Generation Factors - Single Family
Student Generation Factors - Multi -Family
Elementary (Grades K - 6)
0.398
Elementary
0.117
Middle School (Grades 7 - 8)
0.096
Middle School
0.028
Senior High (Grades 9 - 12)
0.185
Senior High
0.029
Total
0.679
Total
0.174
Projected Increased Student Capacity
OSPI - Square Footage per Student
Elementary
2,516
Elementary
90
Middle School
0
Middle School
117
Senior High Addition
0
Senior High
130
Special Education
144
Required Site Acreage per Facility
Elementary (required)
11
Average Site Cost / Acre
Middle School (required)
21
Elementary
$109,967
Senior High (required)
32
Middle School
$686,883
Senior High
$524,564
New Facility Construction Cost
Elementary * $46,077,470
Middle School $0
Senior High * $0
" See cost basis on Pg. 26
Temporary Facility Square Footage
Elementary
142,980
Middle School
10,736
Senior High
22,192
Total 5.1%
175,908
Permanent Facility Square Footage
Temporary Facility Capacity & Cost
Elementary @ 24 $125,000
Middle School @ 29 $0
Senior High @ 31 $0
State Funding Assistance Credit
District Funding Assistance Percentage 56.96%
Construction Cost Allocation
CCA - Cost/Sq, Ft. (Effective July 2016) $213.23
Elementary (Includes KMVA) 1,470,543
Middle School 660,904 District Average Assessed Value
Senior High 1,110,415 Single Family Residence $328,047
Total 94.9% 3,241,862
Total Facilities Square Footage
Elementary
1,613,523
Middle School
671,640
Senior High
1,132,607
Total
3,417,770
Developer Provided Sites / Facilities
Value 0
Dwelling Units 0
District Average Assessed Value
Multi -Family Residence $143,332
Bond Levy Tax Rate/$1,000
Current / $1,000 Tax Rate $1.03
General Obligation Bond Interest Rate
Current Bond Interest Rate 3.95%
CPI Inflation Factor 2.60%
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan
30
April 2018
KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT
IMPACT FEE CALCULATION for SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
Site Acquisition Cost per Single Family Residence
Formula: ((Acres x Cost per Acre) / Facility Capacity) x Student Generation Factor
Required Site Acreage
I Average Site Cost/Acre I
Facility Capacity I
Student Factor
A 1 (Elementary) 11
$109,967
630
0.398
A 2 (Middle School) 21
$0
1,065
0.070
A 3 (Senior High) 32
$0
1,000
0.138
0.606
A
Permanent Facility Construction Cost per Single Family Residence
Formula: ((Facility Cost / Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Permanent/Total Square Footage Ratio)
$764.19
$0
$0
$764.19
Construction Cost
I Facility Capacity I
Student Factor I
Footage Ratio I
B 1 (Elementary)
$46,077,470
630
0.398
0.903
$26,285.66
B 2 (Middle School)
$0
900
0.096
0.984
$0
B 3 (Senior High)
$0
1,600
0.185
0.998
$0
0.679
B
$26,285.66
Temporary Facility Cost per Single Family Residence
Formula: ((Facility Cost / Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Temporary / Total Square Footage Ratio)
Facility Cost
Facility Capacity I
Student Factor I
Footage Ratio
C 1 (Elementary)
$125,000
24
0.398
0.097
$201.07
C 2 (Middle School)
$0
29
0.070
0.016
$0
C 3 (Senior High)
$0
31
0.138
0.02
$0
0.606
C
$201.07
State Funding Assistance
Credit per Single Family Residence (formerly
"State Match")
Formula: Area Cost Allowance
x SPI Square Feet per student x Funding
Assistance % x Student Factor
Construction Cost Allocation I
SPI Sq. Ft. / Student I
Assistance % I
Student Factor
D 1 (Elementary)
$225.97
90
0.5696
0.398
$4,610.48
D 2 (Middle School)
$225.97
117
0
0.096
$0
D 3 (Senior High)
$225.97
130
0
0.185
$0
D
$4,610.48
Tax Credit per Single Family Residence
Average SF Residential Assessed Value $366,437
Current Debt Service Rate / $1,000 $1.03
Current Bond Interest Rate 3.95%
Years Amortized (10 Years) 10 TC b $2,220.95
Developer Provided Facility Credit Facility / Site Value I Dwelling Units
0 0 FC b 0
Fee Recap
A = Site Acquisition per SF Residence
$764.19
B = Permanent Facility Cost per Residence
$26,285.66
C = Temporary Facility Cost per Residence
$201.07
Subtotal
$27,250.92
D = State Match Credit per Residence
$4,610.48
TC = Tax Credit per Residence
$2,220.95
Subtotal
-
$6,831.44
Total Unfunded Need
$20,419.48
50% Developer Fee Obligation
$10,210
FC = Facility Credit (if applicable)
0
District Adjustment (see page 28 for explanation)
(4,813)
Net Fee Obligation per Residence
- Single Family
$5,397
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2018
31
KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT
IMPACT FEE CALCULATION for MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENCE
Site Acquisition Cost per Multi -Family Residence Unit
Formula: ((Acres x Cost per Acre) / Facility Capacity) x Student Generation Factor
I Required Site Acreage
I Average Site Cost/Acre I
Facility Capacity I
Student Factor
A 1 (Elementary)
11
$109,967
630
0.117
A 2 (Middle School)
21
$0
1,065
0.028
A 3 (Senior High)
32
$0
1,000
0.029
0.174
A
Permanent Facility Construction Cost per Multi -Family Residence Unit
Formula: ((Facility Cost / Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Permanent / Total Square Footage Ratio)
$224.65
$0
$0
$114.ti5
Construction Cost
I Facility Capacity I
Student Factor I
Footage Ratio I
B 1 (Elementary)
$46,077,470
630
0.117
0.903
$7,727.19
B 2 (Middle School)
$0
1,065
0.028
0.984
$0
B 3 (Senior High)
$0
1,600
0.029
0.998
$0
0.174
B
$7,727.19
Temporary Facility Cost per Multi -Family Residence Unit
Formula: ((Facility Cost / Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Temporary / Total Square Footage Ratio)
Facility Cost
Facility Capacity
Student Factor
Footage Ratio
C 1 (Elementary)
$125,000
24
0.117
0.097
$59.11
C 2 (Middle School)
$0
29
0.028
0.016
$0
C 3 (Senior High)
$0
31
0.029
0.02
$0
0.174
C
$59.11
State Funding Assistance Credit per Multi -Family Residence (formerly "State Match")
Formula: Area Cost Allowance x SPI Square Feet per student x Funding
Assistance % x Student Factor
Area Cost Allowance
I SPI Sq. Ft. / Student I
Equalization % I
Student Factor
D 1 (Elementary)
$225.97
90
0.5696
0.117
$1,355.34
D 2 (Middle School)
$225.97
117
0
0.022
$0
D 3 (Senior High)
$225.97
130
0
0.039
$0
D
$1,355.34
Tax Credit per Multi -Family Residence Unit
Average MF Residential Assessed Value $143,332
Current Debt Service Rate / $1,000 $1.03
Current Bond Interest Rate 3.95%
Years Amortized (10 Years) 10 TC b $1,156.85
Developer Provided Facility Credit Facility / Site Value I Dwelling Units
0 0 FC 0
Fee Recap
A = Site Acquisition per Multi -Family Unit
$224.65
B = Permanent Facility Cost per MF Unit
$7,727.19
C = Temporary Facility Cost per MF Unit
$59.11
Subtotal
$8,010.95
D = State Match Credit per MF Unit
$1,355.34
TC = Tax Credit per MF Unit
$1,156.85
Subtotal
$2,512.19
Total Unfunded Need
$5,498.76
50% Developer Fee Obligation
$2,749
FC = Facility Credit (if applicable)
0
District Adjustment (see page 28 for
explanation)
($412)
Net Fee Obligation per Residential
Unit - Multi -family
$2,279
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan
32
April 2018
IX Summary of Changes to June 2018 Capital Facilities Plan
The Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") is updated annually based on previous
Plans in effect since 1993. The primary changes from the May 2018 Plan are
summarized here.
Changes to capacity continue to reflect fluctuations in class size as well as
program changes. Changes in portables or transitional capacity reflect use, lease
or purchase, sale, surplus and/or movement between facilities.
The student headcount enrollment forecast is updated annually. All Elementary
schools now have Full Day Kindergarten so six -year Kindergarten projections were
previously modified to meet the requirements for Full Day Kindergarten programs
at all elementary schools.
The district expects to receive some State Funding Assistance (formerly called
"state matching funds") for projects in this Plan and tax credit factors are updated
annually. Unfunded site and facility needs will be reviewed in the future.
The impact fees for 2018 will increase by the percentage increase of the
consumer price index for the Seattle metropolitan area in. For 2017, the increase
was 3.1 %. For single-family residences, the fee will increase by $162 to $5,397.
The impact fee for multi -family units will increase by $69 to $2,279.
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2018
33
Changes to Impact Fee Calculation Factors include:
ITEM I Grade/Type FROM TO I Comments
Student Generation Factor
Elem
0.257
0.398
Single Family (SF)
MS
0.070
0.096
SH
0.138
0.185
Total
0.465
0.679
0.214Increase
Student Generation Factor
Elem
0.111
0.117
Multi -Family (MF)
MS
0.022
0.028
SH
0.039
0.029
Total
0.172
0.174
0.002Increase
State Funding Assistance Ratios ("State Match")
56.96%
56.96%
Per OSPI Website
Area Cost Allowance
$213.23
$225.97
Per OSPI Website
Average Assessed Valuation (AV)
SF
$307,784
$366.437
Puget Sound ESD
AV - Average of Condominiums & Apts.
MF
$123,109
$143,332
Puget Sound ESD
Debt Service Capital Levy Rate / $1000
$1.398
$1.0269
Per King Co. Assessor
Report
General Obligation Bond Interest Rate
3.27%
3.95%
Bond Buyers 20 year GO
Index
Impact Fee - Single Family
SF
$5,235
$5,397
Increase of $162 or 3.1%
Impact Fee - Multi -Family
MF
$2,210
$2,279
Increase of $69 or 3.1 %
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2018
34
CD
N
W
U) J
da
o w
z p
F— '-
U p
O
F-
J Z
pw
o>
SZ
U ,
N }}
F— I—
W U
Y a
a
a
ci
_ >
O
a
c
m 00 c
o ID
N v E
� = O
O N C
r N W
IL
(D W C
N
N LL E
M
O N O
C
a W
0 _T
d
U R W
o O.
R
m U N
E a
O a
O N
N R
(a (a0
c� a
E
R N
O
a` 0
n E a
ro O n
N Q. R
U
m E w
U 0 U
d
m CL
0
U a U
a
w L)
m U
m 0
() T N
co N
_rn C'
Lm
= R m
v U N
� N
fa
a
`o U E
O
O
O y
R
Z a U
m
m
Q
Y
J
z 0
w =
Y w (f
W
z} z z I } a z} I %' z z 71 >. �. z}> I z i. >. i. I i. %' z z l r } %- z z
O
M
m M
N
W
M W
m
n to
O
n
N
n w
O
O M O
O
M m
n
a
a
m
V
m
m
n
w
V m
N
w
m O
N
O m N
O
m
w O
V
m N n
M
N m u)
O
m
a
N
N
V
N
� V
,0
v
M N
V
V V •f
U7
N
V
O N
m
N t0 w
N
v V V
m
M
N
to—
m
O
O U]
O
O
O O
m
O O m
O
O
u)
O O
O
O O O
w
O M O
M
M
O
N
O
m
O
O
O N
O
o
O O
m
O O N
w
O
N
O O
O
O O O
N
O O O
O
O
O
O
O
uj
m
m
M
w
m
V m
N
u7
m
w
M w
m O
w
w
n m _n
O m
m
O
A
O
m
n w
w O
N
V
m M M
m w n
m
N
N m
N m 00
t0
M
m
a
a4
N
N
V
N
n
m
V
N
u]
w
v
M N
V
V V V
m
N
V
w N
m
w m w
w
7 V V
W
M
W
m
r
v
V
V m
N
V
V w
V m
w
tD w
N
v V O
w
N m
w
w
m
m
V
O
N
N V
n
N
N V'
N
O N V
V
O
O
m V
n
N a N
n v O
tr0
v
m
v
O
O
r
r N
M
r
r N
r
O r N
N
O
O
V N
M
r W 10
N
M N O
n
N
It
N
O
O N N MI v N N MI r N r Cl) V O N M VI V N '7 'V'I M r r OI IO N M CO O I Onl
a
m
N
O
m
m m
n O
w
m
n
n
m M
m M
M
m n V
N n m
v
N
w
n
m
N N
w w
n
m
w
I-w
n
m
M
m
n
w
n rn
n n
V
N
O
m
m
n
n
m
m
N F
V
M
V V
V
V
M V
v
V V M
V
M
V
v a
V
V
a a
a
a
V V
st
0
M
M
V
M
rj <
r
i
O
O
V O
O
O
O a
O
O V
O
O
O
O
V w
o
of
O O
v
O
O o
w
O
O
O
o
O
N
N
N
N
N V
N
N w
N
N
N
N
r
w
N
r
m
N U
i
O
u)
m
u) V
N
N
M N
a
V N I-
M
O
n
M W
M
M
W W
Ih
V
r N
10
a
s
N
M
N
r
u
C
P
C
V
m
o
o
v
V m
m o
a
m
n
n
m m
m o
M
m n O
O V.- v
w
n
M w
I-w
N
h n
o
n
n n
w
a
w
n
M
m
m A
V
M
V V
v
V
M st
et
V V M
v V
M
V
a M
V
a
s a
a
a
V V
M
M
M
V
M
N C
U
U
C
4
m
N
ON m
ON
n w
m
m 2
O
a
m n
oN
0N
m c'
r
r
N
r
r N
N
r
N
r
N
N
N
N N
r
r
N
r
� a
2
U>
03:
x
n.
3 w
w
w c)
Iu
>>
(n
w
J
o J
o
�-
3 3
x
U
m
m>
Y
x
J
rL Cr
cL
Z M
m
a
m m
N
to
to
w
gIc
3
F
U
c
E
E
E
c Cc
6
y
al
J
W
T
@
u
F
E
E
Q
tQ
O(
.0
N
F L
N
T
Y
R
N
C
w
ul
7 'D
E
w
0 0
'6
'O
Y
N
Z' I
N
N
K
0
N D
N
T
m
t'
N
N
R
O0
N
CO
~
T
N U
N
R
0
N 3
C
?
m J
`
00
x
:'.
C
j
-
'a
V
J
O
`
aa)i
OI 3
2
R
O O)
02
N O C
w
>
Y
C O
'O
R
C
a,
m
O
F-
N
U
U
m
N
E
'O
C
'j
y
N
C O
y
C
R
O
>`
�
O
C
74
N
O
R
O
NN
d C
Cd
.
C
(y
UR
U U
w
u_ 0
0
_
Y
Y
3
m m
�U
E
z a
a
a
T (n
U)
(n
U)
U
Y
�
t.m
35
I-
Z
w
J
J
O
ix
Z
W
F-
Z
n
O
U
0
a
W
C
m
w
F-
I]-
w
U
Q.'
W
O N O E E
UO O
O N C
= w
m w c
o H u
N LL E
M O
O N C
a w
Y Cd
M U 43
Co m
O O N
c0
� U m
E In
O N
0 (D
U) t:f
m O
v a
E a` )
(6 IU .0
p) N (D
0 = tf
a 0
E w
16
O O N
o n
N 0-
°
M M m r m m m
(D M O m N V (D
(D M ID M O M
N
(OO V C::,
O "t ON O N
(V N m r U-)m O O
(D m O O N V ,lVO
m (D 0IO c0 (D
O O O N � O I co
O O O - N O I co
N V O 'V O O I O
U
o
It, I'-
m co
N
co
N
m
CO
m
N
w
O r
N
r
m
m
N
M
N
,D
W
CO
X
E -2:�
"
0
m m
m N
j
O' v IO co If)
(NO
Z
Q 0 cm
o
t` N m V m
V
LLI
cn 0- Um
d
a
U E E
E
Q
4' m N
(1
N
M I!7 v V' n
cn a
v
0
LU
T
N
CL
w
t`
m
(D
IO
m
)O
O
m
U
\
�
a
w w
U
co
(D
co
LO
LO
N
co
o_
p
m
T
N
u
O
j
C)N
IT
0)
T
CO
CO
cCp m
N
r
LO
I-
CD
(D
(D
W
U U
(6
m
In
O
E
C)
'7
m
(D
M
m
CO
(n
M
N
N
N
M
M
U
co
U
0
Z
0
U
O
O
O
O
L
_N
O
L
U
U
0 LU
O
L
(Li
1
I
N
U o
(j
U
m
a
Y
U
a
a
N
o
(D
o
m
3
z
lc
U
a
a):o
�
U
2
Z
2
(n
_
c, C
C
C
r O
O
p
N
7
O
E
O
m
O
O
co
r
N
CO
O
M
m
m
@ 7
I y
m
,UO
m
V
O
O
m
N
O
t`
O) U
N
IO
O
N
C
N
•--
'�
w
2
w
c 0
N
7 O
w
O
(O
O
N
L
U
O
CDff
N
LL
(fl
v
O
co
cD
00O
-
C,
a')
"O
t`
M
O
(�
O
(`�
It
(D
O
N
(D
O
C,
r
U
7
CO
N
m
M
O
-
-
O
N
O
V
T
U
N
L j
--
(V
r
Lx (p
w
N
m
Z
U
(If
(U
C)
N
m
n0
co00
Lo
p
M
M
O
O
Ib
LO
1n
Ci
@
U
m
E
In
O
cn
w
In
w
OD
O
N
(D
O
W
fn
f6
D
tf
O
v
o_
E
m
O
N
c-
O
N
v
O
a`
7
'OC
0
a
r
E
N
w
�
E
N
Cl)
O
O)
U
(O
=
7
O
m
if
m
t`
N
(O
w
Q
h
O
O
0
CL
(O
_
n
.-
.-
N
N
a)
(U
V
Z
co
U
N
N
d
U
�
U
o X o
E w .N
co
m m co 0
0 r O N r- Lr
CL
Z C D
O_ O (0 o N CO V' V W N w
(n
a
U
m
=
0.,
(n
Q
(D
0)
€
C-4
(D
oo
o
E
(D
(n
CL
d
N
N
O
(D
00
U
o
C
w
W
�
r- f-
co
(0
N
00
O
a)
�
�
m
w
m
m
LO
n
U
m
�
(U
m
a
J
Ncli
ce)w
r
_
(n
U
T
m
L
m
v
CDw
N
o
=
M
(D
co
M
O
1-
If)
m
('
r
N
O
O
C)
c
p_
N
7 V
V
r
(O
(0
(D
m
N
N
e-
-
(n
CD
N
U)
U
@
O
E
Q
CN
(n
rn
(D
LO
00
(O
(O
CD
O
(O
(y3
Z
M
N
m
U
rn
(u
l
Y
Y
Y
Y
C
d
w
_m
2
(7
o
rn
L
rn
=
J
O
c
_m
1:
`o_
o
(n
I
O
CO
C:
m
aY
)
a
w
(D
U
U
IU
N
Y
IT
00
m
0
C
C
C
C
Y
Y
Y
Y
T Q)
E N J
U <
Q c°)i O
X L
.0 7 Q
O 2
L C
a O `o
c
Y w N
N
r
O
w
E
LL U
C 0 od
m
C
a
C
LL Q
N
o d
N
C
O 4%
CL
T Q
c
N Q
`m
CL 4-
V) 0
0
O 0
CL
p C M 1
N <
76 (14 cn
3 N (L 1
N U +
7 _
) o Ca O
o c
i 1'c ° 1
j O O N A
U 7
3 f° LL, o
i N LL T
�T LL - (
S
U C m
O O
L c6 Q) N
3 U 'C - Z
(
O CL C`
3 v E i
n U) O1 n
U o E
i cn w 0
a
a)
LL
m
:Q
N
U
c0
}
in
U
m
0
0
O
L
U
T
C
N
Y
36
Kent School District Fall 2016/17 Demographic Report
M-191, St Renton
Riverton
Heights
l7q-yi3ly 51e Tukwila-S't; `- x Maplewood >� Elliott
m % S
_ - f Renton taalc +i.
McMickon - - C.
Heights fn
ldcVan Cedar
Nountain
0, y
S
t f o
Orltlfa ' 1eO'
� "�%i L•:kt• R:f
•F.Arh St
Seatac
sl --
:^fill: St '� r
167.'
e -
.• c SE 2080. S_
S z1211t st = O Brien
S 22511: St
Midway
_` r
9
Kent
•1
P
y 416
Star Lako
L'
�W, 11. Sl.4e.,w�gi
INlI
Thom s
Meredith 'v
•�n
_ 2Hti11, 5t
_
3*1"S: >l:•: a
•r.
- Christopher
- 3E 30•1u. St
Lea HIII
_ - SE 31211, St
Sialr. St
Auburn y.
J
1511• St SVJ tw
1 1J
'r �1pA
r �fn :4ay S
SC itit
Apartment
Multi -family attached
Single family detached
District
ApdI 19, 2017
tiF 2560, St
a,'•
169• ' In`
Cedar Grove G-"'ram
f
a'
SE 22::1+ S:
s
r
SF- 2'9th,51—
Meridian r •;
Heights
c
Covington
SF 2a2nrl St Maple Vall
Wilderness
1 Village
W- SE 172::r. St
n
Barrydale
to e
t^4+a:nopr: gA
O
y'
Green River
SE Grn.
v
0 -1 2 3 4
WWONWIMM Miles
N
r..
Cherokee
Bay Park
;Easall, st
37
2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
Renton School District No. 403
Board of Directors
Lynn Desmarais, President
Gloria Hodge, Vice President
Dr. Avanti Berquist
Alisa Louie
Pam Teal
Dr. Damien Pattenaude, Superintendent
AAJ
May 2018
enton
SLH4oL oasYFEIct
i#�YICF EXCIELL9711CF I F94JIF7
Approved by the Renton School District Board of Directors on June 6, 2018
2018
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
Renton School District No. 403
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................... 1
II. CAPACITY METHODOLOGY .................................. 5
III. INVENTORY AND CAPACITY OF FACILTIES ................... 9
IV. ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS ............................... 13
V. ENROLLMENT DRIVEN FACILITY NEEDS .................... 15
VI. SIX -YEAR FINANCE PLAN .................................. 17
VII. IMPACT FEES ............................................. 19
VIII. APPENDICES ............................................. 23
2018 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403
I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") was prepared by Renton School District
(the "District") in compliance with the requirements of the Washington State Growth
Management Act (GMA, the Act), King County Code Title 21A.43, and applicable
ordinances of the cities of Bellevue, Newcastle and Renton. It is the District's intent that
the Plan be adopted by King County and the cities of Bellevue, Newcastle and Renton as a
sub -element of their respective Capital Facilities Plans, and that that those jurisdictions
assess and collect school impact fees on behalf of the District, as empowered by the GMA.
This Plan, however, is not intended to be the sole planning instrument developed by the
District to determine its capital facility needs.
The GMA was adopted by the State legislature in 1990 in response to rapidly increasing
development; most notably in King County and the surrounding central Puget Sound area.
The Act requires state and local governments to manage Washington's growth by
developing and implementing comprehensive land -use and transportation plans, by
designating Urban Growth Areas, and by protecting natural resources and environmentally
critical areas.
The Capital Facilities Plan is one element of a County or City's Comprehensive Plan that
addresses existing public facility capacities, forecasts future public facility needs, presents
a plan for expanding existing facilities or constructing new facilities to meet those needs,
and indicates how those public facility improvements are to be financed. The GMA
empowers jurisdictions to assess and collect impact fees as one means of financing new
public facilities necessitated by private development.
This Capital Facilities Plan addresses the impact of growth on public school facilities by
examining:
1. anticipated growth of the District's student population over the next six years;
2. the ability of existing and proposed classroom facilities to adequately house those
students based on the District's current Standard of Service;
3. the need for additional enrollment driven capital facilities;
4. the method of financing those capital improvements; and
5. calculation of school impact fees based on, among other variables, the number of
students generated by recent residential development (student generation factors).
This plan is updated annually and submitted to local governments for inclusion as a sub -
element in their Capital Facilities Plans. Past Plans have been adopted by King County and
the Cities of Bellevue, Newcastle and Renton. The District is currently engaged in
- 1 -
2018 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403
dialogue with the cities of Tukwila and SeaTac regarding implementation of impact fees
within their jurisdictions.
Enrollment Projections:
Enrollment projections provided by the Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction
(OSPI), as adjusted by Renton School District, indicate a moderate overall increase in K-12
enrollment of 2.9% over the next six years. While there is a 10.8% increase at the high
school level over this period of time, the projections show a decrease of 2.2% at grades K-
5, with an increase of 4.5% at the middle schools. The total net increase in student
enrollment over the next six years is projected to be 448 students.
A 2015 independent study of enrollment trends and projections prepared by Educational
Data Solutions for Renton School District, reports less conservative outcomes. Taking into
account King County birth rates, population growth and housing starts, K — 12 student
enrollment over the next six years is projected to increase by as much as 2,560 on the high
end, to as few as 1,203 on the low end, with a recommended projection of 1,851 additional
students. For the purposes of this Capital Facilities Plan we used the more conservative
projections based on OSPI's cohort survival method.
Current Capacity:
Student capacity of existing, permanent K-12 facilities, excluding special education
facilities and facilities housing alternative learning environments, is 14,302. Based on
current enrollment (October 1, 2017 headcount), the District is showing a permanent
facility deficit of 1,244 at the elementary level. While the opening of the new Sartori
Elementary School this fall will greatly reduce that number, the remaining deficit will still
equal the capacity of one elementary school.
With the opening of Risdon Middle School this school year, middle school capacity now
exceeds current student enrollment, but only by a margin of 50, while high school capacity
continues to exceed enrollment, with an excess of 222.
Elementary school capacity is the District's greatest challenge. Relying heavily on the use
of relocatable classrooms (portables) to accommodate the ever-increasing and fluctuating
student population, portables at elementary schools now accounting for over 23% of the
District's total K — 5 facility capacity. Portables are, however, not considered permanent
structures and are not included in the inventory of permanent facilities. They are viewed as
a short-term solution for managing enrollment fluctuation and housing students on a
temporary basis, until permanent facilities can be constructed. They are not considered a
long-term solution.
Enrollment Projections and Future Capacity:
Based on OSPI's conservative projections, K-12 enrollment growth will be slowing down,
with an overall increase of 448 students over the next six years. While high school and
middle school enrollment show increases of 464 and 166, respectively, elementary
enrollment shows a decrease of 166 students over the same period of time.
-2-
2018 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403
The current high school surplus capacity of 222 will be constantly decreasing until the
school year 2022-23, when a deficit of 124 is projected. Similarly, the surplus capacity at
the middle school level may become a deficit as soon as the 2018-2019 school year.
Options on addressing mitigation of secondary facility deficits will need to be considered,
but are not addressed in this Plan.
Even with the opening of the new Sartori Elementary School, scheduled for the 2018-19
school year, and the decrease in elementary enrollment foreseen by the enrollment
projections, a significant deficit exists, and will continue to exist, at elementary schools.
The challenge of adequately housing grades K — 5 is further aggravated by the forthcoming
reduction in K-3 class size. Without the addition of any new facilities, we are looking at a
2024 deficit of 1,360, the equivalent of two elementary schools.
Capital Construction Plan:
For the next six years, one of the District's highest priority will be the construction of new
school facilities to accommodate past and projected growth, recognizing and
acknowledging the major capacity deficit at the elementary school level. This includes:
• Completion of Sartori Elementary School, the District's first urban elementary
school, funded by the 2016 Capital Levy, a STEM school, drawing students from
throughout the District.
• Acquisition of land for future development.
• Construction of an additional elementary school, and/or expansion of existing
elementary school campuses.
• Acquisition of additional relocatable classrooms (portables) and/or the
redistribution of existing relocatables, as necessary.
Other high priority capital improvements will fall into one or more of the following major
categories; Safety and Security, Energy Conservation, Site Improvements, and Building
Upgrades. Improvements will occur district -wide, affecting nearly all District facilities,
achieving and maintaining the level of service necessary to provide safe, healthy, and
nurturing learning environments for all students. Not all of these projects are enrollment
driven.
The District will also be exploring options for future expansion of its high school facilities.
As an alternative to constructing a fourth high school, the feasibility of expanding existing
facilities at the Lindbergh High School and Renton High School sites will be considered.
Finance Plan:
The primary funding sources for capital facilities projects over the next six years include
remaining funds from the 2012 bond measure and 2016 capital levy; school impact fees
currently being collected by King County and the cities of Bellevue, Newcastle and
Renton; state funding available through the Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction;
and, future bond initiatives.
-3-
2018 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403
Estimated expenditures for enrollment driven projects are over the next six years are
$92,300,000, of which approximately 32% are secured by the 2012 Bond and 2016 Capital
Levy, Impact Fees, and State Construction Assistance Program. The remaining 68% is
unsecured.
Impact Fees:
Impact fees were calculated in conformance with King County Council Ordinance 11621,
Attachment A. One factor contributing to the increase in the multi -family fee while
reducing of the single-family fee was the change in the overall student generation factors
(SGF). While the SFG for single-family homes increased by a healthy 10.11%, the multi-
family GFC jumped 66% above the previous year's factor.
A comparison of current and last year's fees is shown below.
2017
2018
Change
Single -Family
$7,772
$6,877
$ 895
Multi -Family
$1,570
$2,455
$885
2018 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403
II. CAPACITY METHODOLOGY
STANDARD OF SERVICE
The Renton School District Standard of Service is the standard adopted by the District that
identifies the program year, school organizational structure, student/teacher ratios by grade
level (taking into account the requirements of students with special needs), daily class
schedule, types of facilities and other factors identified by the District to be beneficial in
supporting its educational programs and objectives. The Standard of Service is the major
determining factor, together with the number of classrooms (or teaching stations) in
calculating facility capacity.
The District has adopted a traditional elementary/middle/high school organizational
structure that houses kindergarten through Grade 5 in elementary schools, Grades 6 through
8 in middle schools, and Grades 9 through 12 in high schools. The school -year calendar
adopted by the District is also traditional; typically beginning in late August and ending in
mid -June. Similarly, the District maintains a fairly traditional daily schedule, with classes
beginning between 7:20 and 9:30 a.m. and ending between 2:03 and 3:10 p.m., depending
on grade level.
The District and the Renton Education Association recognize that reasonable class size is
necessary for optimum learning, and have established the following student/teacher ratios:
Grade Levels K-1
20:1
Grade Level 2
22:1
Grade Level 3
24:1
Grade Levels 4-12
29:1
The 29:1 ratio at the secondary level applies to all Language Arts, Social Studies, Science,
Math, World Languages, World Language Exploratory and Health classes. Other ratios
apply as follows:
Band/Orchestra
40:1
Choir
50:1
Middle School PE
35:1
High School PE
40:1
All other classes
31:1
For the purposes of this report, the student /teacher ratio for special education classes held
in self-contained classrooms within comprehensive elementary and secondary facilities is
assumed to be 12:1. Educational facilities dedicated solely to special education or other
-5-
2018 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403
specialized programs are excluded from capacity calculations, as are associated student
headcounts.
In response to new State and District graduation requirements, beginning with the 2018-
2019 school year, all District high schools will change from the current semester system to
a trimester system, initiating the following changes:
• Three 12-week terms instead of two 18-week terms
• Five 72-minute periods per day instead of six 57-minute periods
• Reduction of classroom efficiency from 82% to 80%, reducing facility capacity
Student/teacher ratios referenced above are applicable to both permanent and relocatable
classrooms. However, inasmuch as relocatable facilities do not generally allow for the full
range of educational activities promoted by the District, they are generally viewed as
temporary or interim housing, necessary to accommodate enrollment fluctuations and
development driven enrollment increases, but only until such time as permanent facilities
can be financed and constructed. For those reasons, relocatable classrooms capacities are
calculated, but not used in the analysis of future facility needs.
PRACTICAL CAPACITY MODEL
The Practical Capacity Model calculates building capacity based on limitations that
existing facilities place on enrollment as a result of current educational program needs,
operating policy and contractual restrictions.
The calculation is made by reviewing the use of each room in each facility. For every
room housing students, a calculation is made, assigning a maximum number of students per
room. Sometimes the capacity of core facilities, such as the cafeteria or gym, or the
quantity of restroom fixtures, may limit facility capacity to a level below that calculated by
collective classroom capacity levels.
Capacity at the secondary school level is further limited by class scheduling restrictions and
student distribution among elective classes. Based on a typical six -period day, if
classrooms are utilized by staff for planning, then capacity is reduced by 17 percent (one -
sixth) of theoretical capacity. Since secondary schools offer a variety of elective courses, it
is not practical to assume that these classrooms will reach 100 percent of their maximum
capacity, without compromising the curriculum.
Another factor that has influenced facility capacity at the elementary school level is the
transition from half -day to full -day kindergarten. Beginning with the 2014-2015 school
year, all kindergarten classes throughout the District were extended to full -day. This
change alone resulted in a decreased elementary school capacity of 692, the equivalent of
more than one entire elementary school. This change was mitigated primarily by providing
additional temporary, relocatable classrooms throughout the District, and by converting
other specialized educational spaces, such as computer labs, into traditional K-5
classrooms.
2018 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403
In addition to full -day kindergarten, reduced student/teacher ratios as prescribed by the
McCleary Act will significantly impact building capacity for grades K-3. A recent survey
conducted as part of the K-3 Classroom Reduction Grant Program, authorized by SSB 6080
and validated under the auspices of OSPI, indicated that Renton School District will require
an additional 42 classrooms to meet the required K-3 student/teacher ratio of 17:1. This
Plan assumes that, beginning in 2020, the District Standard of Service will include a K -3
student teacher ratio of 17:1.
7-
2018 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403
2018 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403
III. INVENTORY AND CAPACITY OF FACILITIES
Renton School District's capital facilities include both permanent structures and relocatable
(portable) classrooms. Permanent facilities are further categorized as either K-12
(traditional elementary, middle and high school configurations), Special Instructional Use
or Non -instructional Support Facilities. The District maintains a total of 30 permanent and
55 relocatable facilities serving a total student population of 15,453 (October 2016
headcount).
The District's permanent K-12 facilities include 14 elementary schools, 4 middle schools,
and 4 high schools. Two Special Instructional Use facilities house the District's early
childhood, special education and alternative learning programs. Support facilities include
the Kohlwes Education Center (admin.), Transportation Center, Facilities Operations and
Maintenance Center, Nutrition Services/Warehouse, Renton Memorial Stadium and the
Lindbergh Swimming Pool. Total permanent facilities encompass 2,518,466 square feet,
with 2,240,456 square feet (93%) devoted to K-12 and instructional special use. See
Appendix A for District Maps.
The District's relocatable K-12 facilities are used primarily to address enrollment
fluctuations and to house students on a temporary basis until permanent facilities can be
constructed. For those reasons they are not considered a long-term solution for housing
students, and are not acknowledged in the calculation of the capacity of K-12 facilities. Of
the 55 relocatable facilities in the District's inventory, 44 are "double portables" containing
two classrooms, and 11 are singles. Combined, they provide the District with a total of 99
relocatable classrooms encompassing 88,720 square feet of additional instructional space.
Table 1 below summarizes existing K-12 facility capacity. A complete inventory of
District facilities, including undeveloped property, follows. Facility capacity worksheets
may be found in Appendix B.
EXISTING FACILITY CAPACITY
Type
YP
Elementary
Schools
Middle
Schools
High
Schools
Total
Permanent
6,384
3,408
4,510
14,302
Relocatable
1,943
552
120
2,615
Total
8,327
3,960
4,630
16,917
Table 2
sox
2018 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403
INVENTORY AND CAPACITY OF PERMANENT FACILITIES
NAME
LOCATION
AREA (ft2)
CAPACITY
Benson Hill
18665 - 116TH Ave. SE, Renton, WA 98058
67,533
536
Bryn Mawr
8212 S 118th St., Seattle, WA 98178
49,157
358
Campbell Hill
6418 S 124th St., Seattle, WA 98178
57,072
356
Cascade
16022 - 116th Ave. SE, Renton, WA 98058
59,164
386
J
O
Hazelwood
7100 - 116th Ave. SE, Newcastle, WA 98056
66161
597
O
Highlands
2727 NE 7th St., Renton, WA 98056
60,000
567
vUi
Honey Dew
800 Union Ave. NE, Renton, WA 98059
54,620
324
Kennydale
1700 NE 28th st., Renton, WA 98056
65,169
648
zLakeridge
7400 S 115th St., Seattle, WA 98178
52,958
286
2
Maplewood Heights
130 Jericho Ave., Renton, WA 98059
56,220
456
�
Renton Park
16828 - 128th Ave. SE, Renton, WA 98058
65,955
536
w
Sierra Heights
2501 Union Ave. NE, Renton, WA 98058
53,992
478
Talbot Hill
2300 Talbot Road, Renton, WA 98055
57,844
480
Tiffany Park
1601 Lake Youngs Way, Renton, WA 98058
58,758
376
Total Grades K-5 Capacity
824,603
6,384
Dimmitt
12320 - 80th Ave. S, Seattle 98178
109,070
884
J J
McKnight
2600 NE 12th St., Renton, WA 98056
126,706
872
O
p O
Nelsen
2403 Jones Ave. S, Renton, WA 98055
124,234
791
U
Risdon
6928 - 116th Ave SE, Newcastle, WA 98056
136,582
861
F�
Total Grades 6-8 Capacity
496,592
3,408
�
Hazen
1101 Hoquiam Ave. NE, Renton, WA 98059
327,395
1,420
p
Lindbergh
16426 - 128th Ave. SE, Renton, WA 98058
242,662
1,128
NRenton
400 S 2nd St., Renton, WA 98057
278,373
1,524
=
Talley
7800 S 132nd St., Renton, WA 98178
70,831
438
=
Total Grades 9-12 Capacity
919,261
4,510
Total Grade Levels K-12
2,240,456
14,302
Meadow Crest ECC 1800 Index Ave. NE, Renton, WA 98056 68,752 464
HOME Program - Spring Glen
2607 Jones Ave. S, Renton, WA 98055
7,005
84
J Z
Q Q
Renton Academy - Spring Glen
2607 Jones Ave. S, Renton, WA 98055
24,837
48
w
J
Total Instructional Special Use
100,594
596
Total Instructional Facilities
2,341,050
14,898
N
Facilities Operations Center
7812 S 124th St., Seattle, WA 98178
21,894
LU
u
Kohlwes Educational Center
300 SW 7th St., Renton, WA 98055
57,000
wLindbergh
Pool
16740 - 128th Ave. SE, Renton, WA 98058
13,600
`"
H
Nutrition Services/Warehouse
409 S Tobin St., Renton, WA 98057
27,466
O
Renton Memorial Stadium
405 Logan Ave. N, Renton, WA 98055
37,213
a
Transportation Center
420 Park Ave. N, Renton, WA 98057
20,243
Ln
Total Support Services
177,416
Total All Permanent Facilities
2,518,466
-10-
2018 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403
INVENTORY AND POTENTIAL CAPACITY OF RELOCATABLE CLASSROOMS
NUMBER OF
SCHOOL
AREA (sq.ft.)
STUDENT
BLDG.ID
LOCATION
CLASSROOMS
NO(S).
CAPACITY
53
McKnight Middle
2
7/8
1,792
48
54
Nelsen Middle
2
7/8
1,792
48
55
Nelsen Middle
2
5/6
1,792
48
56
Nelsen Middle
2
3/4
1,792
48
57
Nelsen Middle
2
1/2
1,792
48
59
Lindbergh High
1
2
896
24
60
Lindbergh High
1
3
896
24
61
Lindbergh High
1
4
896
24
62
Ta I bot Hi I I El ementa ry
1
2
896
29
64
Ta I bot Hi I I El ementa ry
1
1
896
29
65
Dimmitt Middle
1
3
896
24
66
Dimmitt Middle
1
4
896
24
69
Honey Dew Elementary
2
3A/3B
1,792
58
70
Ta I bot Hi I I El ementa ry
1
3
896
29
72
McKnight Middle
2
3/4
1,792
48
73
La keri dge El ementa ry
2
5/6
1,792
58
74
Sierra Heights Elementary
2
5/6
1,792
58
77
McKnight Middle
2
5/6
1,792
48
78
McKnight Middle
2
1/2
1,792
48
79
Dimmitt Middle
2
1/2
1,792
48
80
Honey Dew Elementary
2
2A/2B
1,792
58
81
Cascade Elementary
2
1/2
1,792
58
82
Sierra Heights Elementary
2
1/2
1,792
58
83
Lindbergh High
2
5
1,792
48
84
Maplewood Heights Elementary
2
5/6
1,792
58
85
Dimmitt Middle
1
5
896
24
86
Dimmitt Middle
1
6
896
24
87
Dimmitt Middle
1
7
896
24
88
Bryn Mawr Elementary
2
1/2
1,800
58
89
Bryn Mawr Elementary
2
3/4
1,800
58
90
Honey Dew Elementary
2
4A/4B
1,792
58
91
Honey Dew Elementary
2
1A/1B
1,792
58
92
Tiffany Park Elementary
2
1/2
1,792
58
93
Spring Glen
2
1/3
1,792
48
94
Spring Glen
2
2/4
1792
48
95
Campbell Hill Elementary
2
2A/2B
1,792
58
96
Campbell Hill Elementary
2
1A/1B
1,792
58
97
Cascade Elementary
2
3/4
1,792
58
98
Cascade Elementary
2
5/6
1,792
58
99
La keri dge El ementa ry
2
7/8
1792
58
100
La keri dge El ementa ry
2
3/4
1,792
58
101
Campbell Hill Elementary
2
3A/3B
1,792
58
102
Campbell Hill Elementary
2
4A/4B
1,792
58
103
Maplewood Heights Elementary
2
1/2
1,792
58
104
Maplewood Heights Elementary
2
3/4
1792
58
105
Maplewood Heights Elementary
2
7/8
1,792
58
106
Sierra Heights Elementary
2
3/4
1,792
58
107
Sierra Heights Elementary
2
7/8
1,792
58
108
Tiffany Park Elementary
2
3/4
1792
58
109
Bryn Mawr Elementary
2
5/6
1,792
58
110
Hazelwood Elementary
2
1A/1B
1792
58
111
Maplewood Heights Elementary
2
9/10
1792
58
112
Maplewood Heights Elementary
2
11/12
1792
58
113
Ta I bot Hi I I El ementa ry
2
1A/1 B
1792
58
114
Ta I bot Hi I I El ementa ry
2
2A/2 B
1792
58
Total
99
88,720
2,711
- 11 -
2018 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403
RELOCATABLE FACILITY CAPACITY BY SITE
AREA
LOCATION
ADDRESS
RELOCATABLE FACILITY ID
(sq. ft.)
CAPACITY
ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS
Bryn Mawr
8212 S 118th St., Seattle 98178
88, 89, 109
5,392
174
Campbell Hill
6418 S 124th St., Seattle 98178
95, 96, 101, 102
7,168
•
232
Cascade
16022 116th Ave. SE, Renton 98058
81, 97, 98
5,376
174
Hazelwood
7100116th Ave. SE, Newcastle 98056
110
1,792
58
Honeydew
800 Union Ave. NE, Renton 98059
69, 80, 90, 91
7,168
232
Lakeridge
7400 S 115th St., Seattle 98178
73, 99, 100
5,376
174
Maplewood Heights
130Jericho Ave. SE, Renton 98059
84, 103, 104, 105, 111, 112
10,752
348
Sierra Heights
2501 Union Ave. NE, Renton 98059
74, 82, 106, 107
7,168
232
Talbot Hill
2300Talbot Rd. S, Renton 98055
62, 64, 70, 113, 114
6,272
203
Tiffany Park
1601 Lake Youngs Way SE, Renton 98058
92,108
3,584
116
Elementary School Total
60,048
1,943
MIDDLE SCHOOLS
D i m m i tt 12320 80th Ave. S, Sea ttl e 98078 65, 66, 79, 85, 86, 87 6,272 168
McKnight 1200 Edmonds Ave. NE, Renton 98056 53, 72, 77, 78 7,168 192
Nelsen 2403 Jones Ave. S, Renton 98055 54, 55, 56, 57 7,168 192
Middle School Total 20,608 552
HIGH SCHOOLS
Lindbergh 16426 128th Ave. SE, Renton 98058 59, 60, 61, 83 4,480 120
High School Total 4,480 120
INSTRUCTIONAL SPECIAL USE
Spring Glen 2706 Jones Ave. S, Renton 98055 93,94 3,584 96
Special Education Total 3,584 96
TOTAL ALL RELOCATABLE CLASSROOMS 88,720 2,711
UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY
Skyway Site 4.18 acres NW corner S Langston Rd. & 761h Ave. S
-12-
2018 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403
IV. ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS
Renton School District six -year enrollment projections through the 2023-24 school year are
based on data published by the Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction (OSPI).
OSPI utilizes the cohort survival method to forecast student enrollment projections for a
six -year period based on actual student headcounts documented for the previous six years.
Enrollment reports prepared by the District are submitted to OSPI on a monthly basis. The
District's October 1, 2016 Enrollment Report and OSPI Report No. 1049, dated March 12,
2018, are included in Appendix C.
Renton School District six -year enrollment projections, found on the following page,
reflect adjustments to OSPI's report based on the following:
1. Report structure has been modified to reflect middle school versus junior high
school grade level configuration.
2. Headcount includes only K-12 students attending comprehensive instructional
facilities and excludes students attending special education facilities or facilities
dedicated to alternative learning experiences.
As shown in Table 3 below, current projections indicate a modest overall increase in
student enrollment of 2.9% over the next six years. This includes a substantial 10.8%
increase in enrollment at the high school level, offset by a 2.2% decrease at the elementary
grade levels K — 5. Middle school grade levels 6 — 8 should experience a moderate
increase of 4.5% over the same period of time.
PROJECTED ENROLLMENT GROWTH
OCT.2017
HEADCOUNT
2023-24
PROJECTION
ENROLLMENT
INCREASE
PERCENT
INCREASE
ELEMENTARY
7,628
7,462
-166
-2.2
MIDDLE
3,358
3,508
150
4.5
HIGH
4,288
4,752
464
10.8
TOTAL
15,274
15,722
448
2.9
Table 3
-13-
2018 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403
RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 403
ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS BY COHORT SURVIVAL*
(KK Linear Projection)
--HEADCOUNT--
AVE. %
- - - - PROJECTED ENROLLMENTS ----
Oct. 2017
SURVIVAL
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Kindergarten
1,248
1,262
1,256
1,251
1,245
1,239
1,233
Grade 1
1,278
102.19
1,275
1,290
1,284
1,278
1,272
1,266
Grade 2
1,248
98.95
1,265
1,262
1,276
1,270
1,265
1,259
Grade 3
1,330
98.52
1,230
1,246
1,243
1,257
1,251
1,246
Grade 4
1,297
98.44
1,309
1,210
1,226
1,224
1,238
1,232
Grade 5
1,227
99.05
1,285
1,297
1,199
1,215
1,212
1,226
Total K-5
7,628
7,625
7,561
7,479
7,489
7,477
7,462
Grade 6
1,126
96.81
1,188
1,244
1,255
1,161
1,176
1,174
Grade7
1,134
99.92
1,125
1,187
1,243
1,254
1,160
1,175
Grade 8
1,098
100.01
1,134
1,125
1,187
1,243
1,255
1,160
Total 6-8
3,358
3,447
3,556
3,685
3,658
3,590
3,508
Grade 9
1,086
102.35
1,124
1,161
1,152
1,215
1,272
1,284
Grade 10
1,076
99.70
1,083
1,120
1,157
1,148
1,211
1,268
Grade 11
1,015
91.00
979
985
1,020
1,053
1,045
1,102
Grade 12
1,111
105.01
1,066
1,028
1,035
1,071
1,106
1,097
Total 9 - 12
4,288
4,252
4,295
4,363
4,487
4,634
4,752
Total K-12
15,274
15,324
15,411
15,528
15,634
15,702
15,722
CHANGE
50
87
116
107
68
20
%CHANGE
0.3%
0.6916
0.8910
0.7%
0.4916
0.1%
* Information adapted from OSPI Enrollment Projects Report No. 1049, January 13, 2017. Headcount and
projections do not include enrollment at Special Use facilities.
-14-
2018 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403
V. ENROLLMENT DRIVEN FACILITY NEEDS
Table 4 compares the current permanent capacity of Renton School District facilities to
current and projected enrollment for the next six years.
At the elementary level, the opening of the new Sartori Elementary School in October,
2018, will drastically reduce the current deficit of 1,244 to 506. Beginning in 2020,
however, with the implementation of the reduced K-3 teacher/student ratio, the deficit will
rise again to 1,377. Even with an overall decrease in elementary enrollment projected over
the next six years, the permanent capacity deficit in 2023 is still anticipated to be 1,360.
Opening of the new Risdon Middle School in 2017 resulted in a permanent capacity surplus
of 50 for grade levels 6-8. By the start of the 2018 school year, however, we expect that
surplus to become a deficit of 39, and by 2023, that deficit is anticipated to grow to 100.
At the high school level, the District shows a decreasing surplus capacity until 2023, when
enrollment finally overtakes capacity, resulting in a deficit of 73.
In addition to the current and future projected permanent facility deficits, portable classroom
capacity at existing elementary and middle school sites is reaching its maximum.
PROJECTED STUDENT CAPACITY 2017-2023
2017
2018
2019
2020'
2021
2022
2023
PERMANENT CAPACITY
6,384
7,119
7,119
6,102
6,102
6,102
6,102
ELEM.
STUDENT ENROLLMENT
7,628
7,625
7,561
7,479
7,489
7,477
7,462
K-5
SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY3
(1,244)
(506)
(442)
(1,377)
(1,387)
(1,375)
(1,360)
PERMANENT CAPACITY
3,408
3,408
3,408
1 3,408
3,408
3,408
1 3,408
MIDDLE
STUDENT ENROLLMENT
3,358
3,447
3,556
3,685
3,658
3,590
3,508
6-8
SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY
50
(39)
(148)
(277)
(250)
(182)
(100)
PERMANENT CAPACITY
4,510
4,510
4,510
4,510
4,510
4,510
4,510
HIGH
STUDENT ENROLLMENT
1 4,288
1 4,252
1 4,295
1 4,363
1 4,487
1 4,634
1 4,752
6-8
SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY
1 222
1 258
1 215
1 147
1 23
1 (124)
1 (242)
Table 4
1. Does not include relocatable facilities (portables)
2. Reflects implementation of reduced K-3 class size per
3. Includes Sartori Elementary, which opens September 2018
While the projected deficits at the middle and high school levels may not warrant the
construction of new facilities, expansion of existing campuses may be a viable alternative.
At the elementary level, even ignoring the reduction of K-3 class sizes, a new elementary
school seems eminent. Taking reduced class size into account, additional facilities will most
likely be required.
Renton School District is currently establishing a Citizen Facilities Advisory Committee
whose responsibility it will be to develop recommendations for a long-term capital facilities
plan. Integral to this plan will be the prioritization of facility needs to be presented to the
Board of Directors for inclusion in a 2019 Bond measure. Among the topics to be addressed
-15-
2018 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403
by the Committee will be enrollment driven needs as supported by this document and other
data presented by the District and its consultants, the extent to which portables can be
expected to accommodate future growth, and the need to acquire real property for future
school construction. The bond measure is scheduled to go before the voters in February
2019.
-16-
2018 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403
VI. SIX -YEAR FINANCE PLAN
Capital facilities capacity improvements identified in this Plan will be funded by a 2016
Capital Levy, remaining funds from a 2012 Bond measure, impact fees assessed and
collected by King County and the cities of Bellevue, Newcastle and Renton, and possible
future bond initiatives or other unsecured funding. The District may also be eligible for
funding through the OSPI School Construction Assistance Program (SCAP).
The District's intent in structuring its capital improvement programs is to maintain a
constant level of construction throughout the program period in order to optimize the
utilization of its management capabilities. The District utilizes a combination of in-house
project management (Capital Projects Office) and outside management consultants.
Estimated expenditures for capacity improvement projects over the duration of the Plan are
indicated in Table 5 below.
SIX -YEAR FINANCE PLAN
Capacity Improvement Projects
PROJECT
Estimated Expenditures) ($1,000s)
Funding ($1,000s)
2018-19
2019-20
2020-21
2021-22
2022-23
2022-23
Total
Secured
Unsecured
Risdon Middle School
2,500
2,500
2,500
Sartori Elementary
19,500
2,500
22,000
22,000
Elementary No. 16
500
14,000
23,000
9,200
46,700
46,700
Relocatable Classrooms
2,540
1,270
1,270
5,080
2,540
2,540
Land Acquisition
2,670
2,670
2,670
2,670
2,670
2,670
16,020
2,900
13,120
Total
27,210
6,940
17,940
25,670
11,870
2,670
92,300
29,940
62,360
Table 5
1. Estimated expenditures based on tota I project cost inc I uding hard and soft costs.
2. Secured funding includes 2012 bond and 20161evy monies, previously collected school impact fees, and OSPI SCAP
funds.
3. Unsecured funds includeOSPI School Construction Assistance, future school impactfees and future bond initiatives.
-17-
2018 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403
MRIM
2018 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403
VII. IMPACT FEES
The GMA empowers jurisdictions to assess and collect impact fees as a means of
supplementing the funding of additional public facilities necessitated by new development.
In the case of public schools, impact fees are assessed only on residential development.
To determine an equitable school impact fee throughout unincorporated King County, King
County Code 2 1 A was adopted, establishing an impact fee formula that has in turn been
adopted by the cities of Bellevue, Newcastle and Renton, in their respective enabling
ordinances. The formula requires that school districts establish "Student Generation
Factors" that estimates the number of students generated by each new single or multi-
family residential unit constructed, and to establish district -specific construction costs that
are unique to that district. Refer to Appendix G for substantiating documentation on
Student Generation Factors.
Other factors influencing impact fees include:
Site Acquisition Costs - the estimated cost per acre to purchase property.
Building Acquisition Cost - the estimated cost to construct facilities unique to the
district. New Facility Cost Models are provided in Appendix G.
Temporary Facility Cost - the estimated cost per classroom to purchase and install a
relocatable classroom, including site work and utilities.
State Funding Assistance Credit - the amount of funding provided by the State, subject
to District eligibility, based on a construction cost allocation and funding assistance
percentage established by the State.
Beginning in 2013, the District introduced a Voluntary District Fee Adjustment component
into the prescribed impact fee formula in response to the declining, and then slowly
recovering, economy. This was discontinued in 2016 given improved economic
conditions, especially within the construction industry.
Based on the Growth Management Act and King County Code 21 A, impact fees for the
plan year 2018 are:
Single -Family Units $ 6,877
Multi -Family Units $ 2,455
Single -Family and Multi -Family Fee Calculation spreadsheets follow.
-19-
2018 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403
SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE FEE CALCULATION
SITE ACQUISITION COST
FACILITY SITE AREA
COST PER ACRE
STUDENTS
STUDENT FACTOR
COST
Al Elementary 8
650,000
600
0.359
$3,111
A2 Middle 0
650,000
850
0.128
$0
A3 High 0
650,000
1250
0.126
$0
A Total
0.613
$3,111
BUILDING ACQUISITION COST
COST IN 2018 $
STUDENTS
STUDENT FACTOR
COST
B1 Elementary 93.21%
29,640,000
600
0.382
$17,589
B2 Middle 95.88%
46,499,860
850
0.144
$0
B3 High 99.52%
0
1250
0.149
$0
B Total 96.31%
0.675
$17,589
TEMPORARY BUILDING ACQUISITION COST
COST PER CLASS
STUDENTS
STUDENT FACTOR
COST
C1 Elementary 6.79%
171,600
29
0.382
$153
C2 Middle 4.12%
171,600
26
0.144
$39
C3 High 0.48%
171,600
26
0.149
$0
C Total 3.69%
0.675
$193
STATE FUNDING ASSISTANCE CREDIT
COST INDEX
SPI SQ FT
MATCH %
STUDENT FACTOR
CREDIT
D1 225.97
90
0.3822
0.382
($2,969)
D2 225.97
117
0.3822
0.144
$0
D3 225.97
130
0.3822
0.149
$0
D Total
0.675
($2,969)
TAX CREDIT (TC)
AVERAGE ASSESSED VALUE (AAV)
427,300
INTEREST RATE FOR BONDS (i)
3.85%
TERM (t = MAXIMUM 10)
10
TAX RATE (r)
0.00119417
TC Total
($4,169.82)
($4,170)
FACILITY CREDIT
$0
TOTAL FEE $13,754
50%DEVELOPER FEE OBLIGATION $6,877
IMPACT FEE $6,877
* TAX CREDIT (TC) = NPV (net present value) x AAV x r
1+it-I
where: NPV =
i (I + i)t
AAV =
Average Assessed Value
r =
Tax Rate
i =
Bond Interest Rate as of 03/2017
t =
Bond Term
-20-
2018 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403
MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENCE FEE CALCULATION
SITE ACQUISITION COST
FACILITY
SITE AREA
COST PER ACRE
STUDENTS
STUDENT FACTOR
COST
Al Elementary
8
650,000
600
0.132
$1,144
A2 Middle
0
650,000
850
0.052
$0
A3 High
0
650,000
1250
0.065
$0
A Total
0.249
$1,144
BUILDING ACQUISITION COST
COST IN 2018 $
STUDENTS
STUDENT FACTOR
COST
B1 Elementary 93.21%
29,640,000
600
0.132
$6,078
B2 Middle 94.59%
46,499,860
850
0.052
$0
B3 High 99.52%
0
1250
0.065
$0
B Total 96.75%
0.249
$6,078
TEMPORARY BUILDING ACQUISITION COST
COST PER CLASS
STUDENTS
STUDENT FACTOR
COST
C1 Elementary 6.79%
171,600
29
0.132
$53
C2 Middle 5.41%
171,600
26
0.052
$19
C3 High 0.48%
171,600
26
0.065
$0
C Total 3.25%
0.249
$72
STATE FUNDING ASSISTANCE CREDIT
COST INDEX
SPI SO FT
MATCH %
STUDENT FACTOR
CREDIT
D1 225.97
90
0.3822
0.132
($1,026)
D2 225.97
117
0.3822
0.052
$0
D3 225.97
130
0.3822
0.065
$0
D Total
0.249
($1,026)
TAX CREDIT (TC)
AVERAGE ASSESSED VALUE (AAS)
139,108
INTEREST RATE FOR BONDS (i)
3.85%
TERM (MAXIMUM 10)
10
TAX RATE (r)
0.00119417
TC Total
($1,357.49)
($1,357)
FACILITY CREDIT
$0
FEE
$4,910
50%DEVELOPER FEE OBLIGATION
$2,455
IMPACT FEE
$2,455
1+it-1
* TAX CREDIT (TC) = NPV (net present value) x AAV x r where: NPV = i (1 + i)t
AAV = Average Assessed Value
r = Tax Rate
i = Bond Interest Rate as of 03/2017
t = Bond Term
-21 -
2018 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403
-22-
2018 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403
XIII. APPENDICES
APPENDIX A: DISTRICT MAPS ....................................... 25
APPENDIX B: CAPACITY WORKSHEETS...............................27
APPENDIX C: HEADCOUNT & PROJECTIONS ...........................29
APPENDIX D: STUDENT GENERATION FACTORS .......................31
APPENDIX E: SCHOOL COST MODELS ................................ 33
APPENDIX F: CHANGES FROM PREVIOUS PLAN .......................37
-23-
2018 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403
-24-
2018 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403
APPENDIX A
RSD BOUNDARY MAP - MUNICIPALITY OVERLAY
Renton Srhoc I Ulstrict Map Legend
. Bellevue M Renton
0 Kefit 0Seatac
. icing County Tukwila
Newcastre - City Limits
of Renton
KC U
Albbreviations
EEarmaorary S PrLdK Schools:
$e cwiAsry $ lKmAp:
BHE
Beoxn Hill EleinPOtary
Oh1S Ornmilt piddle $drool
BME
B yo M&,Ai Elemimlwy
FIr#$ Haler, High Sqhaal
CES
Cascade Elementary
!H$ Lud6ergh Hgh $chao-
QHE
Campbell Hill Eleme-nLary
MM$ MdKnrghl Midine $chop
HIDE
Hon63Gew Bensmary
NW Nelsen MdGa �r.hpgl
I IES
Hazlewood Ekemwmry
RH$ Rarem 3egh Schw
ALE
FlghLands ELemeetary
AN'$ Risdon lAdpy $Ghngl
KOE
1Gerrnydaia Elermemary
TH$ Talley HV $Ghrol
LRE
Lskandge Elerwnlay
MEC
#&Ma 3wtiLttEarly Learning
MHE
Mop"aud heyhis V&wwrlary
RAS
RenlauAndamy
RPE
Rdnldu Park Ekrnareary
SES.
Sancti Elmeantary
SHE
Slftm Heights Elernenlary
THE
Talhol Hill Elernnmh5ry
TPE
TPany dark Elen khiy
-25-
2018 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403
APPENDIX A
-26-
2018 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403
APPENDIX B
=1 4 =1►Ti I =1 ki 11 r_1: &*41: I r &*l F"111 L'7
ASSUMPTIONS StudentlTeacher Ratios:
\ Grades K - 1
20:1
Grade 2
22:1
Grade 3
24:1
Grades 4 - 5
29:1
Scheduling Efficiency
1.00
Program Efficiency
1.00
SCHOOL
PERMANENT TEACHING STATIONS
RELOCATABLE CLASSROOMS
TOTAL
CAP
TOT
K-1
2
3
4.5
SPED
OTHER
CAP
TOT
K-1
2
3
4.5
SPED
OTHER
CAP
BENSON HILL
31
8
4
3
6
3
7
536
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
536
BRYN MAWR
23
8
4
4
0
1
6
358
6
0
0
0
6
0
0
174
532
CAMPBELL HILL
24
7
4
3
0
4
6
356
8
0
0
1
6
0
1
198
554
CASCADE
28
8
4
4
0
3
9
386
6
1 0
0
0
6
0
0
174
560
HAZELWOOD
30
8
5
4
7
2
4
597
2
0
0
0
2
0
0
58
655
HIGHLANDS
30
9
4
4
7
0
6
567
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
567
HONEY DEW
21
8
1 4
2
0
1 2
5
324
8
0
0
2
1 6
1 0
0
1 222
1 546
KENNYDALE
31
9
4
5
8
2
3
648
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
648
LAKERIDGE
24
6
3
3
0
2
10
286
6
0
0
0
6
0
0
174
460
MAPLEWOOD HEIGHTS
26
11
6
2
0
4
3
456
1 12
1 0
0
4
8
0
0
328
784
RENTON PARK
30
8
4
3
6
3
6
536
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
536
SIERRA HEIGHTS
27
8
4
3
4
3
5
478
8
0
0
1
4
0
3
140
618
TALBOT HILL
25
8
3
1
6
4
3
480
4
0
0
3
0
0
1
72
552
TIFFANY PARK
24
7
4
2
2
3
6
376
4
0
0
0
3
0
1
87
463
TOTAL
374
113
57
43
46
36
79
6,384
64
0
0
11
47
0
6
1627
1 8011
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CAPACITY 2020 - 2023
ASSUMPTIONS StudentfTeacher Ratios:
\ Grades K - 1
17:1
Grade 2
17:1
Grade 3
17:1
Grades 4 - 5
29:1
Scheduling Efficiency
1.00
Program Efficiency
1.00
SCHOOL
PERMANENT TEACHING STATIONS
RELOCATABLE CLASSROOMS
TOTAL
CAP
TOT
K-1
2
3
4.5
SPED
OTHER
CAP
TOT
K-1
2
3
4.5
SPED
OTHER
CAP
BENSON HILL
31
8
4
3
6
3
7
471
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
471
BRYN MAWR
23
8
4
4
0
1
6
286
6
0
0
0
6
0
0
174
460
CAMPBELL HILL
24
7
4
3
0
4
6
294
8
0
0
1
6
0
1
191
485
CASCADE
28
8
4
4
0
3
9
314
6
0
0
0
6
0
0
174
488
HAZELWOOD
30
8
1 5
4
7
1 2
4
520
2
0
0
1 0
1 2
0
0
58
578
HIGHLANDS
30
9
4
4
7
0
6
492
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
492
HONEY DEW
21
8
4
2
0
2
5
266
8
0
0
2
6
0
0
208
474
KENNYDALE
31
9
4
5
8
2
3
566
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
566
LAKERIDGE
24
6
3
3
0
2
10
232
6
0
0
0
6
0
0
1 174
406
MAPLEWOOD HEIGHTS
26
11
6
2
0
4
3
379
12
0
0
4
8
0
0
300
679
RENTON PARK
30
8
1 4
3
6
1 3
6
471
1 0
1 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
471
SIERRA HEIGHTS
27
8
4
3
4
3
5
413
8
0
0
1
4
0
3
133
546
TALBOT HILL
25
8
3
1
6
4
3
434
4
0
0
3
0
0
1
51
485
TIFFANY PARK
24
7
4
2
2
3
6
321
4
0
0
0
3
0
1
87
408
TOTAL
374
113
57
43
46
36
79
5,459
64
0
0
11
47
0
6
1550
7009
-27-
2018 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403
APPENDIX B
MIDDLE SCHOOL CAPACITY
ASSUMPTIONS Student/Teacher Ratios
Core Classes
29:1
Band/Orchestra
40:1
Choir
50:1
PE
35:1
All Other
31:1
SPED
12:1
Scheduling Efficiency
0.80
Program Efficiency
0.95
SCHOOL
PERMANENT TEACHING STATIONS I CLASSROOMS
RELOCATABLES
TOTAL
TOTAL
GEN.
SCI
PE
DRAMA
COMP
CTE
ART
MUSIC
SPED
OTHER
CAP.
TOTAL
SPEC. USE
CAP.
CAPACITY
DIMMITT
43
19
5
3
0
2
2
1
2
5
4
884
7
0
154
1038
WKNIGHT
43
17
7
4
0
2
2
1
3
4
3
872
8
0
176
1048
NELSEN
53
14
6
4
1
3
3
1
2
9
10
791
8
0
176
968
RISDON
49
18
6
3
1
3
2
1
3
3
9
861
0
0
0
861
TOTAL
139
68
24
14
2
10
9
4
10
21
26
3408
23
0
507
3915
HIGH SCHOOL CAPACITY
ASSUMPTIONS Student/Teacher Ratios
Core Classes
29
Band/Orchestra
40:1
Choir
50:1
PE
40:1
All Other
31:1
Scheduling Efficiency
0.80
Program Efficiency
0.90
PERMANENT TEACHING STATIONS/CLASSROOMS
RELOCATABLES
TOTAL
SCHOOL
TOTAL
GENERAL
SCI
PE
DRAMA
COMP
CTE
ART
MUSIC
SPED
OTHER
LAV.
TOTAL
SPEC. USE
CAP.
CAPACITY
HAZEN
77
48
6
5
3
6
4
3
2
9
0
1420
0
0
0
1420
LINDBERGH
59
34
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
5
0
1128
5
0
104
1232
RENTON
78
44
6
5
6
7
5
3
2
5
0
1524
0
0
0
1524
TALLEY
27
19
1
1
1
2
1
1
0
1
5
438
0
0
0
438
TOTAL
241
145
17
15
14
19
13
10
7
20
5
4510
5
0
104
4614
SPECIAL EDUCATIONAL FACILITY CAPACITY
ASSUMPTIONS Student/Teacher Rations
General
24:1
Pre K - 3
17:1
Special Ed.
12:1
Program Efficiency
0.95
PERMANENT TEACHING STATIONS/CLASSROOMS
RELOCATABLES
TOTAL
SCHOOL
TOTAL
I GENERAL
SPEC.ED.
Pre K-3
CAPACITY
TOTAL
SPEC. USE
CAPACITY
CAPACITY
SPRING GLEN
9
2
7
0
132
4
2
72
204
MEADOW CREST
21
0
1
20
352
0
0
0
352
TOTAL
30
2
8
20
484
4
0
72
556
im
2018 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403
APPENDIX C
z
p
z
W
ac
4
Wb
�
iY
i'J
I'Y
TY
iY
IY
rY
SO
N
N
Y11
Q
Ill
r-1
1u�"�yy
n
,,
• +
- i
{
T+
.--i
mar
.a
rl
iy
N
N
I''1
rl
c
Yiwp
u'Y
%M
44pp
Ow
W
I�
iP1
g
In
�
#
v
JY
+4'F
4
44
ri
P`
YfY
A'F
O
'+I
+Y
Fl
ri
Ip
r1
�
O
-r
O
-r
'8k
lyb5
8
�
WmI1'�+
�V�Op4
r4+
m
m
C4
od+
O
O
O
O
4
h
1
�
�
N
4
IL
f�M1
fWYS
.rt
F
4
ti
�u"7
j
V4
�
�Q
Rs
ifY
T
iY
M
G
r'i}
T-1
!'T
ri
Q5
N
J
s
r
!J
i'hY
F4
M
N
�
M
�
M
�
A
rl
rl
�
Q
t•
G
.rt
rl
�¢
rl
rl
�
F/
rF
rl
rl
QY
�
��
-I J
S
i
G
++
N
w5
;
yI
Yo
N
d
m
r+
w
Jj
I �
Ili
LA
U
qw
p4
y4
q
ww
4
#J
4
yV�
5A�
fG
yn
�p
O
w
MOM
2018 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403
APPENDIX C
Q
uD
W
ry
il-
r4
c4
r4
�Ln
m
75
MN
ti
r+i
eN
ry
O
4
Q
Ch
eN
,--i
4
tD
p
rn
,--i
01
.ppad�
ni
rol
C.
r--
SO
od
U5
ry
rw
n
m
OS
#
M
rri
m
11
a
--
O
ry
fm
*r
ey
rri
ry
.y
o8
rah
+Y
#
.y
ra
T
tp
hk
ry
r-1
Iti
O
h
r
�-
c
ev
a6
4
r-1
ry
r�
rQ
N
O
Q
ry
Q
►+
1
-1
Ch
�+
h-
u3
-C
r 4
ra
n*.
Gs
87
-r
n,
Ik
iw
uA
,-I
r-
UD
00
rti
Z
rw
05
6
D
Lo
-1
M
O
N
,-1
T
h
W
Q
#�
�
Gti
,
Oti
T-4
-
R
71
N
rA
T
h
ID
S
G
a v
sp
c
co
q
u-.
rl
ri
av
rw
�,
ri
fn
V
'I
rtf
UN
u's
r-r
US
m
T
ry
h
Q5
w5
m
Q
I'+
u'S
f4
rw
ry
Iw
u3
a¢
ry
m
oq
v,
m
rw
ti
Ln
,--i
r "i
rl
2 C
2
r-1
r-I
r-1
W
..
2
z
g�qj
tO
V_
Y
C
l.3
H
H
C
2
[C
J
-30-
2018 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403
APPENDIX D
STUDENT GENERATION FACTORS
The formula for determining school impact fees, as established by King County Council
Ordinance 11621, Attachment A, requires that school districts provide "student factors
based on district records of average actual student generation rates for new developments
constructed over a period of not more than five years prior to the date of the fee
calculation." The Ordinance also provides that, in the event this information is not
available in the District, "data from adjacent districts, districts with similar demographics,
or county -wide averages must be used."
King County currently assesses and collects impact fees on behalf of eleven school
districts, including Renton School District. Of those eleven districts, seven districts
conduct their own surveys to develop their unique student generation factors based on
district records and actual development data. The remaining four districts, including
Renton, rely on averages of student factors developed by other districts.
In accordance with King County Ordinance 11621, Attachment A, the District has chosen
to use a county -wide average based on all districts that have performed their own student
generation factor surveys as well as those that have similarly relied on county -wide data.
The Student Generation Factors in the table below represent an average of the student rates
calculated by the other ten school districts.
STUDENT GENERATION FACTORS
ELEMENTARY
MIDDLE SCHOOL
HIGH SCHOOL
TOTAL
(K-5)
(6-8)
(9-12)
SINGLE-FAMILY
0.382
0.144
0.149
0.675
MULTI -FAMILY
0.132
0.052
0.065
0.250
TABLE 6
The table on the following page details the student generation factors developed by the
Districts referenced above, and the averages used in this Plan's impact fee calculations.
-31-
2018 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403
APPENDIX D
COUNTY -WIDE STUDENT GENERATION FACTORS
DISTRICT
SI NGLE-FAMI LY
MULTI -FAMILY
K-5
6-8
9-12
TOTAL
K-5
6-8
9-12
TOTAL
Auburn
0.193
0.077
0.073
0.343
0.103
0.031
0.044
0.178
Enumclaw
0.345
0.130
0.135
0.610
0.083
0.031
0.033
0.147
Federal Way
0.220
0.120
0.143
0.483
0.597
0.237
0.323
1.157
Fife
0.325
0.136
0.137
0.598
0.127
0.057
0.066
0.250
Highline
0.152
0.026
0.065
0.243
0.093
0.047
0.070
0.210
Issaquah
0.354
0.153
0.148
0.655
0.119
0.063
0.075
0.257
Kent
0.398
0.096
0.185
0.679
0.117
0.028
0.029
0.174
Lake Washington
0.424
0.171
0.119
0.714
0.058
0.019
0.019
0.096
Northshore
0.331
0.108
0.081
0.520
0.036
0.013
0.009
0.058
Riverview
0.345
0.130
0.135
0.610
0.083
0.031
0.033
0.147
Snoqualmie Valley
0.389
0.162
0.134
0.685
0.089
0.041
0.047
0.177
Tahoma
0.345
0.130
0.135
0.610
0.083
0.031
0.033
0.147
TOTAL
3.821
1.439
1.490
6.750
1.588
0.629
0.781
2.998
AVERAGE
0.318
0.120
0.124
0.675
0.132
0.052
0.065
0.250
-32-
2018 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403
APPENDIX E
FACILITY COST MODELS
Facility cost models are a calculation of the cost to construct educational facilities unique
to the District. This is accomplished by utilizing both District specific data as well as
information available from OSPI.
OSPI constants are factors established by OSPI as part of its School Construction
Assistance Program. State Funding Assistance Percentages are unique to individual school
districts while the Construction Cost Allocation (per square foot of construction) is
constant throughout the state. The State Area Allocation (per student) is used solely by
OSPI to determine a District's eligibility for state funding. It is not meant to represent or
reflect the unique spatial needs of a District necessary to provide its adopted programs and
standard of service.
The District Area Allocation utilized in the cost models reflects historical data from
previously constructed facilities, or facilities currently under construction, adjusted to
reflect current programs, anticipated funding and other topical issues. The applied Cost per
Square Foot is an average of recently bid school projects of similar grade levels in the
Puget Sound Region, as reported by OSPI.
Elementary and Middle School Cost Models follow.
-33-
2018 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403
APPENDIX E
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL COST MODEL
FACILITY INFORMATION
Building
Site Work
Student capacity
600
Area (acres)
8
SF per student
116
Cost per acre
$600,000
Generic classrooms
30
Right-of-way LF
2,000
Gym and cafeteria
Separate
Right-of-way cost per LF
$440
Building area (SF)
69,600
Utility improvements
$350,000
Cost per SF
$325
Demolition
Site Preparation
Area (SF)
50,000
Area (acres)
8
Cost per SF
$15
Cost per acre
$30,000
CONSTRUCTION COST
Demolition
$750,000
Site prep
$240,000
Building
$22,620,000
Site work
$4,800,000
Right-of-way improvements
$880,000
Off -site utility improvements
$350,000
Subtotal $29,640,000
Cost per SF $426
SOFT COSTS
Professional fees
10.0%
$2,964,000
Sales tax
10.0%
$2,964,000
Change Order Contingency
7.0%
$1,830,395
Permits
2.0%
$522,970
Special inspections
1.0%
$261,485
Art
0.0%
$0
Work under separate contract
0.5%
$130,743
Temporary Facilities/Moving & Storage
0.5%
$130,743
Furniture, fixtures & equipment
8.0%
$2,091,880
Project management
2.0%
$522,970
District administration
1.5%
$392,228
Mitigation
2.0%
$522,970
Project contingency
7.0%
$2,074,800
51.5%
Subtotal $14,409,183
CONSTRUCTION COSTS + SOFT COSTS 1 $44,049,183
ESCALATION Year
Inflation Rate
Amount
2019
2.62%
$45,203,271
2020
2.79%
$46,464,442
2021
2.74%
$47,737,568
2022
2.85%
$49,098,089
2023
2.86%
$50,502,294
2024
2.89%
$51,961,810
Note: Amounts do not include property acquisition
-34-
2018 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403
APPENDIX E
MIDDLE SCHOOL COST MODEL
FACILITY INFORMATION
Building
Site Work
Student capacity
850
Area (acres)
15
SF per student
140
Cost per acre
$400,000
Generic classrooms
31
Right-of-way LF
1,000
Building area (SF)
119,000
Right-of-way cost per LF
$350
Cost per SF
$325
Utility improvements
$231,000
Demolition/Abatement
Site Preparation
Area (SF)
52,924
Area (acres)
15
Cost per SF
$15
Cost per acre
$30,000
CONSTRUCTION COST
Demolition
$793,860
Site prep
$450,000
Building
$38,675,000
Site work
$6,000,000
Right-of-way improvements
$350,000
Off -site utility improvements
$231,000
S u btota 1
$46, 499, 860
Cost per SF
$391
SOFT COSTS
Professional fees
10.0%
$4,649,986
Sales tax
10.0%
$4,649,986
Change Order Contingency
7.0%
$1,830,395
Permits
2.0%
$522,970
Special inspections
1.0%
$261,485
Art
0.0%
$0
Work by separate contract
1.0%
$261,485
Temporary Facilities
0.5%
$130,743
Moving and Storage
0.5%
$130,743
Furniture, fixtures & equip.
10.0%
$2,614,850
Project management
1.0%
$261,485
District administration
1.5%
$392,228
Mitigation
2.0%
$522,970
Project contingency
7.0%
$3,254,990
53.5%
S u btota 1
$19,484, 315
CONSTRUCTION COSTS + SOFT COSTS
$65,984,175I
ESCALATION
Year Inflation Rate
Amount
2019 2.62%
$67, 712, 960
2020 2.79%
$69,602,152
2021 2.74%
$71,509,251
2022 2.85%
$73,547,264
2023 2.86%
$75,650,716
2024 2.89%
$77,837,022
Note: Amounts do not include property acquisition
-35-
2018 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403
APPENDIX E
-36-
2018 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403
APPENDIX F
CHANGES FROM PREVIOUS PLAN
PERMANENT
STUDENT CAPACITY
2017
2018
CHANGE
Elementary
6,172
6,384
212
Middle
2,990
3,408
418
High
4,679
4,510
-169
Tota 1
13,841
14,302
461
ACTUAL STUDENT ENROLLMENT (October Headcount)
2017
2018
CHANGE
Elementary
7,622
7,628
6
Middle
3,216
3,358
142
High
4,279
4,288
9
Tota 1
15,117
15,274
157
IMPACT FEES
2017
2018
CHANGE
Single -Family
7,772
6,877
(895)
Multi -Family
1,570
2,455
885
STUDENT GENERATION FACTORS
2016
2017
CHANGE
Single -Family
Elementary
0.359
0.382
0.023
Middle
0.128
0.144
0.016
High
0.126
0.149
0.023
Total
0.613
0.675
0.062
Multi -Family
Elementary
0.091
0.132
0.041
Middle
0.027
0.052
1 0.025
High
0.032
0.065
0.033
Total
0.150
0.249
0.099
ADDITIONAL IMPACT FEE FACTORS
2016
2017
CHANGE
Land Acquisition/Acre
550,000
650,000
100,000
Temp Bldg Acquisition
171,600
177,000
5400
State Match Percentage
0.3822
0.3822
0
Ave. Assessed Value - Single
375,989
427,300
51,311
Ave. Assessed Value - Multi
123,175
1 139,108
1 15,933
Bond Interest Rate
3.95%
3.85%
(0.00)
Tax Rate / $1000
2.64198
1.19417
(1.44781)
37
2018 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403
APPENDIX F