Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutD_Admin_Report_Weatherly_Inn_Mod_181211.pdfDEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Project Location Map D_Admin_Report_Weatherly_Inn_Mod_181211 A. ADMINISTRATIVE MODIFICATION REPORT & DECISION Decision: APPROVED APPROVED SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS DENIED Report Date: December 11, 2018 Project File Number: PR18-000010 Project Name: Weatherly Inn Bicycle Parking and Garbage Enclosure Modifications Land Use File Number: LUA18-000647, MOD Project Manager: Matt Herrera, Senior Planner Owner: Weatherly Inn – Renton LLC, 606 Columbia St NE, Olympia, WA 98501 Applicant/Contact: Frank Durocher, RJ Development, 401 Central St SE, Olympia, WA 98501 Project Location: 4500 Talbot Rd S Project Summary: The applicant is requesting two modifications from the City Wide Property Development Standards related to the refuse and recyclables enclosure and bicycle parking requirements. The applicant received Hearing Examiner Site Plan Approval on August 15, 2018 for a development that would provide 116 assisted living units, 19 memory care units, 132 surface parking spaces, and associated improvements on a 4.62 acre property located at 4500 Talbot Rd S. The Hearing Examiner decision included conditions of approval to provide revised site plan and details for a code- compliant refuse and recyclables enclosure and bicycle parking area with the building permit application or submit a formal modification request. Site Area: 4.62 acres DocuSign Envelope ID: 2828A270-EB33-49FD-8FCE-E9678358D84F City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Weatherly Inn Bicycle Parking and Garbage Enclosure Modifications Administrative Modification Report & Decision LUA18-000647, MOD Report of December 11, 2018 Page 2 of 8 D_Admin_Report_Weatherly_Inn_Mod_181211 B. EXHIBITS: Exhibit 1: Administrative Modification Decision Exhibit 2: Trash Enclosure Modification Request Justification Exhibit 3: Bicycle Parking Modification Request Justification Exhibit 4: November 28, 2018 applicant email correspondence with trash compactor manufacturer Exhibit 5: November 29, 2018 applicant email correspondence with facility owner regarding age of residents C. FINDINGS OF FACT (FOF): 1. The Planning Division of the City of Renton accepted the above master application for review on October 19, 2018 and determined the application complete on that date. The project complies with the 120-day review period. 2. The applicant’s submittal materials comply with the requirements necessary to process the modification request (Exhibits 2 and 3). 3. The project site is located 4500 Talbot Rd S. 4. The project site is currently undeveloped and forested. 5. Access to the site would be provided via a new driveway generally aligned with S 45th Pl. A portion of the driveway would be located on the northern abutting property (4512 Talbot Rd S) within an existing shared driveway easement. 6. The property is located within the Commercial Mixed Use (CMU) Comprehensive Plan land use designation. The eastern portion of the property is located within the Residential Low Density Comprehensive Plan land use designation. However, this portion of the property will remain undeveloped. 7. The site is located within the Commercial Office (CO) zoning classification. The eastern portion of the property is located within the Residential-1 (R-1) zoning classification, but will remain undeveloped. 8. There are approximately 306 trees (252 significant trees) located on-site, of which the applicant is proposing to retain a total of 43 significant trees. 9. The site is mapped with Geologically Hazardous Areas, specifically sensitive slopes and protected slopes with potential landslide and erosion hazards. Critical areas analysis was provided in the staff report to the Hearing Examiner for the project’s site plan review application. 10. The applicant is proposing to begin construction in the first quarter of 2019 with approximately 15 months of construction. 11. Representatives from various city departments have reviewed the application materials to identify and address issues raised by the proposed development. These comments are contained in the official file, and the essence of the comments has been incorporated into the appropriate sections of this report and the Departmental Recommendation at the end of this report. 12. Modification Analysis: The applicant is requesting a modification from RMC 4-4-090D.1.a and E.3 in order to reduce the required minimum for recyclables and refuse deposit areas from the required 622 square feet to a modified 432 square feet. The multi-family minimum that would be applied to the assisted living component of the project would require a minimum of 1.5 square feet of space per unit for recyclables and three (3) square feet of refuse space per dwelling unit totaling a minimum of 522 square feet of DocuSign Envelope ID: 2828A270-EB33-49FD-8FCE-E9678358D84F City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Weatherly Inn Bicycle Parking and Garbage Enclosure Modifications Administrative Modification Report & Decision LUA18-000647, MOD Report of December 11, 2018 Page 3 of 8 D_Admin_Report_Weatherly_Inn_Mod_181211 deposit area space. The institutional minimum that would be applied to the memory care component of the project would require a minimum of two (2) square feet per every 1,000 square feet of building gross floor area be provided for recyclables deposit areas and a minimum of four (4) square feet per 1,000 square feet of building gross floor area be provided for refuse deposit areas, but a total minimum area of 100 square feet shall be provided for recycling and refuse deposit areas. The memory care portion of the project would default to a minimum of 100 square feet of total deposit area. The proposal is compliant with the following modification criteria, pursuant to RMC 4-9-250. Therefore, staff is recommending approval of the requested modification per the analysis below: Compliance Modification Criteria and Analysis  a. Substantially implements the policy direction of the policies and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element and the Community Design Element and the proposed modification is the minimum adjustment necessary to implement these policies and objectives. Staff Comment: The applicant contends that providing a 622 square foot enclosure would result in modifying the proposed retaining walls along the eastern portion of the site, which could impact tree retention and the need for further disturbance of the sensitive slopes conflicting with policies L-35 and L-56. Staff concurs the requested modification to reduce the area of refuse and recyclables would substantially implement the policy direction of the Comprehensive Plan as it continues to ensure that new development is designed to be functional and attractive (Goal L-BB). The reduction in refuse and recycling space will create less of an impact to the area along the east portion of the property set aside for tree retention and protection of the sensitive slopes. A larger sized enclosure area would likely result in additional grading and higher retaining walls to accommodate the enclosure and needed garbage truck maneuvering space. The modification is the minimum adjustment necessary to accommodate the proposed trash compacter and recycle bins. The applicant has coordinated with Republic Services, the City’s contracted servicer, to ensure adequate space is provided.  b. Will meet the objectives and safety, function, appearance, environmental protection and maintainability intended by the Code requirements, based upon sound engineering judgment. Staff Comment: The applicant contends that the use of a trash compacter reduces the space needed for refuse by 50 percent (50%). Coordination with Republic Services to design an enclosure space of 432 square feet that includes the required clearances for access and gate configuration has occurred. Staff concurs the proposed modification would meet the objectives of function and maintainability intended by the code requirements as the applicant would be utilizing a trash compacter that would provide greater capacity than a typical dumpster. The applicant has coordinated their planning with Republic Services and the compactor manufacturer (Exhibit 4) to ensure their enclosure would meet their requirements and provide the capacity needed for the assisted living/memory care facility.  c. Will not be injurious to other property(ies) in the vicinity. Staff Comment: The applicant contends the enclosure reduction would not be injurious to properties in the vicinity. DocuSign Envelope ID: 2828A270-EB33-49FD-8FCE-E9678358D84F City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Weatherly Inn Bicycle Parking and Garbage Enclosure Modifications Administrative Modification Report & Decision LUA18-000647, MOD Report of December 11, 2018 Page 4 of 8 D_Admin_Report_Weatherly_Inn_Mod_181211 Staff concurs that the reduction in the enclosure size would not impact other properties on the vicinity. The enclosure is located behind the building and away from public view. The reduction in enclosure size would be mitigated through the use of a compactor that would provide greater capacity.  d. Conforms to the intent and purpose of the Code. Staff Comment: The applicant contends the reduction would conform to the intent and purpose of the code Staff concurs that the intent and purpose of the Code would be maintained with the proposed modification. The garbage enclosure space requirements are meant to ensure adequate area is set aside for refuse and recyclables and that garbage and recyclable material does not piled up outside the enclosure or scattered throughout the property. The applicant would utilize a compactor to increase the capacity of the space thereby reducing the overall need for a larger enclosure. See comments under criterion ‘b’.  e. Can be shown to be justified and required for the use and situation intended; Staff Comment: The applicant contends the design of the enclosure has been vetted with Republic Services. Staff concurs the reduction is justified and required as the City’s contracted garbage hauler has indicated that the proposed compacter would not require the 622 square feet of space that is required by code. The reduction of overall enclosure space maintains a refuse and recyclable deposit area that is required for all new development per RMC 4-4-090.A. See comments under criterion ‘b’.  f. Will not create adverse impacts to other property(ies) in the vicinity. Staff Comment: See comments under criterion ‘c’. 13. Modification Analysis: The applicant is requesting a modification from RMC 4-4-080.F.11.a and b in order to reduce the minimum required 60 bicycle parking spaces and provide six (6) bicycle parking spaces in an uncovered outdoor rack. The assisted living units (attached dwellings) would be required to provide 0.5 bicycle parking spaces per one dwelling unit or 58 spaces. The memory care would be required to provide bicycle parking equaling 10 percent (10%) of the required off-street vehicle parking spaces or two (2) spaces. The proposal is compliant with the following modification criteria, pursuant to RMC 4-9- 250, if all conditions of approval are met. Therefore, staff is recommending approval of the requested modification, subject to conditions as noted below: Compliance Modification Criteria and Analysis Compliant if condition of approval is met a. Substantially implements the policy direction of the policies and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element and the Community Design Element and the proposed modification is the minimum adjustment necessary to implement these policies and objectives. Staff Comment: The applicant contends that their project is not a typical multi-family project that would generate the need for 60 bicycle parking spaces as the residents are typically in their 70s and 80s (Exhibit 5) and not as able-bodied to utilize active transportation as other residential developments. The proposed reduction in spaces and location would not impact the policy direction of the Comprehensive Plan as the development maintains a quality design per Goal L-FF. DocuSign Envelope ID: 2828A270-EB33-49FD-8FCE-E9678358D84F City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Weatherly Inn Bicycle Parking and Garbage Enclosure Modifications Administrative Modification Report & Decision LUA18-000647, MOD Report of December 11, 2018 Page 5 of 8 D_Admin_Report_Weatherly_Inn_Mod_181211 Staff concurs that a reduction of bicycle parking spaces would not impact the policy direction of the Comprehensive Plan. However staff finds it is not the minimum adjustment necessary to implement the policies. A reduction of bicycle parking spaces to 10 percent (10%) of the requirement assumes that those healthy residents, staff members, or visitors have no interest or ability to utilize active transportation. Talbot Rd S is identified as a bicycle lane route on the Renton Trails and Bikeways Map and the applicant will be providing a section of bicycle lane with their required frontage improvements. Comprehensive Plan Goal L-EE promotes, in part, community resiliency through healthy lifestyles and active transportation. There is space on the property and within the building to provide an additional six (6) bicycle parking spaces that are secure and protected from weather. Therefore, staff recommends as a condition of approval, the applicant provide six (6) additional bicycle parking spaces within the building for staff and resident use that meet the location, space, and design requirements of RMC 4-4-080F.11.c. The additional spaces shall be shown on a floor plan sheet with the building permit application to be reviewed and approved by the Current Planning Project Manager prior to permit issuance. Compliant if condition of approval is met b. Will meet the objectives and safety, function, appearance, environmental protection and maintainability intended by the Code requirements, based upon sound engineering judgment. Staff Comment: The applicant contends the proposed six (6) outdoor bicycle parking spaces would provide adequate space for the facilities employees that would commute via bicycle. The rack would be located near the rear entrance where employees are required to enter. Staff finds the modification request assumes no visitors to the facility would arrive via bicycle as there would not be an obvious location to park a bicycle with the exterior rack located in the rear of the building. As mentioned previously, the property is located on a future bike lane route and the City promotes active transportation in the Comprehensive Plan. By not providing an obvious bicycle parking area near the front of the building it could result in a bicycle obstructing a pathway or entrance. Therefore, staff recommends as a condition of approval the applicant provide a bicycle rack near the front of the building that provides parking for a minimum of four (4) bicycles and does not obstruct a pedestrian connection or entrance to the building. The bicycle rack shall meet the standards of RMC 4-4-080F.11.b. The rack shall be located on the site plan submitted with the building permit application to be reviewed and approved by the Current Planning Project Manager prior to permit issuance.  c. Will not be injurious to other property(ies) in the vicinity. Staff Comment: The applicant contends the requested modification would have no impact on other properties in the vicinity. Staff concurs that the proposed reduction and recommended conditions of modification approval would not be injurious to other properties in the vicinity. The siting of the bicycle parking spaces would be a part of the overall construction of the facility and would not require any heavy equipment to install. Compliant if condition of approval is met d. Conforms to the intent and purpose of the Code. Staff Comment: The applicant contends that providing the reduced spaces for the facility employees satisfies the intent of the code as it was not intended for an assisted living facility to provide 60 bicycle parking spaces. DocuSign Envelope ID: 2828A270-EB33-49FD-8FCE-E9678358D84F City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Weatherly Inn Bicycle Parking and Garbage Enclosure Modifications Administrative Modification Report & Decision LUA18-000647, MOD Report of December 11, 2018 Page 6 of 8 D_Admin_Report_Weatherly_Inn_Mod_181211 Staff concurs that providing 60 bicycle parking spaces for an assisted living facility would likely not be needed or fully utilized. However there would likely be some interest from those residents that are able to and enjoy riding bicycles as well as from visitors and staff to the facility. As conditioned, the facility would provide parking for 16 bicycles with a minimum of six (6) spaces inside the building protected from weather. See comments under criterion ‘b’. Compliant if condition of approval is met e. Can be shown to be justified and required for the use and situation intended; and Staff Comment: The applicant contends they are providing bicycle parking as required but not in the amount required by code as there will be little interest in bicycles at the facility Staff finds the reduction in spaces and additional spaces per the recommended conditions of approval will provide sufficient parking for residents, employees, and visitors. See comments under criterion ‘b’.  f. Will not create adverse impacts to other property(ies) in the vicinity. Staff Comment: See comments under criterion ‘c’. E. DECISION: The proposal satisfies six (6) of the (6) criteria listed in RMC 4-9-250D.2 for approval of modifications. Therefore, the Weatherly Inn Bicycle Parking and Garbage Enclosure Modifications File No. LUA18-000647, MOD, is approved and is subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall provide six (6) additional bicycle parking spaces within the building for staff and resident use that meet the location, space, and design requirements of RMC 4-4-080F.11.c. The additional spaces shall be shown on a floor plan sheet with the building permit application to be reviewed and approved by the Current Planning Project Manager prior to permit issuance. 2. The applicant shall provide a bicycle rack near the front of the building that provides parking for a minimum of four (4) bicycles and does not obstruct a pedestrian connection or entrance to the building. The bicycle rack shall meet the standards of RMC 4-4-080F.11.b. The rack shall be located on the site plan submitted with the building permit application to be reviewed and approved by the Current Planning Project Manager prior to permit issuance. DATE OF DECISION ON LAND USE ACTION: SIGNATURE: Jennifer Henning, Planning Director Date TRANSMITTED on December 11, 2018 to the Owner/Applicant/Contact: Owner: Applicant/Contact: Alex Bunn, Weatherly Inn – Renton LLC, 606 Columbia St NE, Olympia, WA 98501 Frank Durocher, RJ Development, 401 Central St SE, Olympia, WA 98501 DocuSign Envelope ID: 2828A270-EB33-49FD-8FCE-E9678358D84F 12/11/2018 | 2:44 PM PST City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Weatherly Inn Bicycle Parking and Garbage Enclosure Modifications Administrative Modification Report & Decision LUA18-000647, MOD Report of December 11, 2018 Page 7 of 8 D_Admin_Report_Weatherly_Inn_Mod_181211 TRANSMITTED on December 11, 2018 to the Parties of Record (from LUA18-000011): Swanson Gardener Meyers PLLC 4512 Talbot Rd S Renton, WA 98055 Alice Daniels 4702 Morris Ave S Renton, WA 98055 Austin Groves 401 Central St SE Olympia, WA 98501 Caleb Perkins 401 Central St SE Olympia, WA 98501 David Smith PO Box 50010 Renton, WA 980585010 Denny Bullock 501 S 46th Pl Renton, WA 98055 Jim Godfrey Chateau Retirement Communities 15029 Woodinville Redmond Rd Woodinville, WA 98072 Joe Carlson Chateau Retirement Communities 15029 Woodinville-Redmond Rd NE, 200 Woodinville, WA 98072 Nancy Osborn 4635 Morris Ave S, #F Renton, WA 98055 Rebecca Davidson John C Radovich Dev Co 2835 82nd Ave SE, S-1 Mercer Island, WA 98040 Todd Gardner Swanson Gardner Meyers PLLC 9545 Lake Washington Blvd NE Bellevue, WA 980045408 TRANSMITTED on December 11, 2018 to the following: Chip Vincent, CED Administrator Brianne Bannwarth, Development Engineering Manager Amanda Askren, Property Services Vanessa Dolbee, Current Planning Manager Rick Marshall, Fire Marshal K. LAND USE ACTION APPEALS, REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION, & EXPIRATION: The administrative land use decision will become final if the decision is not appealed within 14 days of the decision date. APPEAL: This administrative land use decision will become final if not appealed in writing to the Hearing Examiner on or before 5:00 PM on December 26, 2018. An appeal of the decision must be filed within the 14- day appeal period (RCW 43.21.C.075(3); WAC 197-11-680), together with the required fee to the Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. RMC 4-8-110.B governs appeals to the Hearing Examiner and additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the City Clerk’s Office, (425) 430-6510. EXPIRATION: The Modification decision will expire two (2) years from the date of decision. A single one (1) year extension may be requested pursuant to RMC 4-9-250. RECONSIDERATION: Within 14 days of the decision date, any party may request that the decision be reopened by the approval body. The approval body may modify his decision if material evidence not readily discoverable prior to the original decision is found or if he finds there was misrepresentation of fact. After review of the reconsideration request, if the approval body finds sufficient evidence to amend the original decision, there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action must file a formal appeal within the 14-day appeal time frame. THE APPEARANCE OF FAIRNESS DOCTRINE: provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning the land use decision. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial decision, but to Appeals to the DocuSign Envelope ID: 2828A270-EB33-49FD-8FCE-E9678358D84F City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Weatherly Inn Bicycle Parking and Garbage Enclosure Modifications Administrative Modification Report & Decision LUA18-000647, MOD Report of December 11, 2018 Page 8 of 8 D_Admin_Report_Weatherly_Inn_Mod_181211 Hearing Examiner as well. All communications after the decision/approval date must be made in writing through the Hearing Examiner. All communications are public record and this permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence in writing. Any violation of this doctrine could result in the invalidation of the appeal by the Court. DocuSign Envelope ID: 2828A270-EB33-49FD-8FCE-E9678358D84F CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATIVE MODIFICATION REPORT & DECISION EXHIBITS Project Name: Weatherly Inn Bicycle Parking and Garbage Enclosure Modifications Land Use File Number: LUA18-000647, MOD Date of Report December 11, 2018 Staff Contact Matt Herrera Senior Planner Project Contact/Applicant Frank Durocher RJ Development 401 Central St SE, Olympia, WA 98501 Project Location 4500 Talbot Rd S The following exhibits are included with the Administrative Modification Report: Exhibit 1: Administrative Modification Decision Exhibit 2: Trash Enclosure Modification Request Justification Exhibit 3: Bicycle Parking Modification Request Justification Exhibit 4: November 28, 2018 applicant email correspondence with trash compactor manufacturer Exhibit 5: November 29, 2018 applicant email correspondence with facility owner regarding age of residents DocuSign Envelope ID: 2828A270-EB33-49FD-8FCE-E9678358D84F RJ Development 401 Central St SE – Olympia, WA 98501 (360) 528-3343 – www.rjdevelopment.com WEATHERLY INN RENTON MODIFICATION REQUEST: TRASH ENCLOSURE AREA 4500 Talbot Rd S – LUA18-000011 Please accept this letter as our justification for a Modification Request to the trash enclosure area requirements per RMC 4-4-090, which states the following: • Dimensions of the refuse and recyclables deposit areas shall be of sufficient width and depth to enclose containers for refuse and recyclables, and to allow easy access. • Garbage dumpsters, refuse compactor areas, and recycling collection areas must be fenced or screened. A six foot (6') wall or fence shall enclose any outdoor refuse or recyclables deposit area. In cases where Zoning Code fencing provisions conflict with the six foot (6') wall or fence requirement, the Zoning Code provisions shall rule. Refuse and recyclables deposit areas located in industrial developments that are greater than one hundred feet (100') from residentially zoned property are exempted from this wall or fence requirement. • Enclosures for outdoor refuse or recyclables deposit areas/collection points and separate buildings used primarily to contain a refuse or recyclables deposit area/collection point shall have gate openings at least twelve feet (12') wide for haulers. In addition, the gate opening for any separate building or other roofed structure used primarily as a refuse or recyclables deposit area/collection point shall have a vertical clearance of at least eleven feet (11'), but no more than fourteen feet (14'). According to the Staff Report from the Site Plan Review approval, the guidelines for the new community are to have 622 total square feet dedicated to the management of trash and recycling, broken down as follows: • 100 square feet of space for the Memory Care portion of the community • 174 square feet of space for recycling for the Assisted Living portion of the community • 348 square feet of space for trash for the Assisted Living portion of the community We have worked with Hilsia Rogers from the city’s contracted garbage collector, Republic Services, and confirmed that the space required can be reduced by 50% with the use of a trash compactor. We have coordinated the design of a 432 square foot enclosure that meets their requirements with regard to clearances inside the enclosure, access requirements for the service vehicle, and a door/gate configuration that allows servicing of the compactor and recycling receptacles. This design has been engineered by a licensed architect and will be installed according to approved plans by a licensed General Contractor. This is the maximum size for an enclosure in the available space, as any design that is larger would require changes to retaining walls, which would also potentially impact tree retention on the undisturbed portion of the project site. EXHIBIT 2PLANNING DIVISION DocuSign Envelope ID: 2828A270-EB33-49FD-8FCE-E9678358D84F RJ Development 401 Central St SE – Olympia, WA 98501 (360-528-3343) – www.rjdevelopment.com In addition to a 15 yard trash compactor, the enclosed design also outlines that we will be utilizing two separate, wheeled, four-yard receptacles inside the enclosure for the community’s recycling needs. A representative from Republic Services will roll the recycling receptacles through the large swinging gates on the enclosure to be serviced and returned to their location. The proposed design meets city code requirements for screening with wall height, door height, and roof clearance and will not have any impact or be injurious to any surrounding properties or neighbors. As such, we request that the city approves this new design to allow us to move forward with the permitting process. Figure 1 - Compactor specs as provided by Republic Services Figure 3 - Access Clearance on Site Plan Figure 2 - Trash Enclosure Details DocuSign Envelope ID: 2828A270-EB33-49FD-8FCE-E9678358D84F RJ Development 401 Central St SE – Olympia, WA 98501 (360) 528-3343 – www.rjdevelopment.com WEATHERLY INN RENTON MODIFICATION REQUEST: BICYCLE PARKING SPACES Please accept this letter as our justification for a Modification Request to the bicycle parking requirements per RMC 4-4-080F.11.a, which states the following: • (For the Memory Care portion of the building) The number of bicycle parking spaces shall be equal to ten percent (10%) of the number of required off-street vehicle parking spaces. • (For the Assisted Living portion of the building) One-half (0.5) bicycle parking space per one dwelling unit. With 116 units of Assisted Living and 30 beds of Memory Care, the code guidelines above would require a total of sixty (60) bicycle parking spaces. We understand that the code was written to generally address the needs of facilities where able-bodied individuals will need equitable access to safe spaces to secure their bicycles. However, the very nature of Assisted Living and Memory Care facilities like the Weatherly Inn is to care for residents that are no longer physically or mentally able to participate in the level of physical activity that would enable them to have a bicycle that would need to be secured on-site. Conversely, employees of the Weatherly Inn may, regularly or occasionally, desire to commute to work via bicycle. At peak shift change, the Weatherly Inn is expected to have 35 employees on-site, and we propose to install six (6) bicycle parking spaces at the rear main entrance where all employees will be required to enter and exit. These spaces will be in very close proximity to the employee break room and time clock. Providing six (6) spaces to secure bicycles should be more than adequate as it would cover at least 17% of on-site employees at any time (including both Assisted Living and Memory Care operations). The proposed bicycle parking spaces are to be designed by a licensed architect and installed according to approved plans by a licensed General Contractor. The proposal of six (6) bicycle parking spaces as outlined above is expected to have zero impact on the neighboring businesses and properties as they would only be used by staff for the Weatherly Inn. Please see Figure 1 on the next page for a diagram of the proposed location. Frank Durocher Project Manager RJ Development frank@RJDevelopment.com “Seniors Housing Delivered” ™ EXHIBIT 3PLANNING DIVISION DocuSign Envelope ID: 2828A270-EB33-49FD-8FCE-E9678358D84F RJ Development 401 Central St SE – Olympia, WA 98501 (360-528-3343) – www.rjdevelopment.com Figure 1 - Proposed Location For Bicycle Parking Spaces DocuSign Envelope ID: 2828A270-EB33-49FD-8FCE-E9678358D84F From: Frank Durocher <frank@rjdevelopment.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2018 4:06 PM To: Matthew Herrera Subject: FW: Trash Compactor Guidelines for New Development Matt, please see Todd’s email below. Hilsia only told me 2:1 compactor ratio, but Todd is saying here that even the smallest of these compactors does around 3:1. Frank Durocher Project Manager RJ Development 401 Central St SE Olympia, WA 98501 D ▪ (360) 810-8359 O ▪ (360) 528-3343 Email: frank@rjdevelopment.com “Seniors Housing Delivered” ™ From: Todd Johnson <toddj@blankenshipequipment.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2018 3:42 PM To: Frank Durocher <frank@rjdevelopment.com>; 'Rogers, Hilsia' <HRogers@republicservices.com> Subject: RE: Trash Compactor Guidelines for New Development Hey Frank. I’ve attached an updated sheet for the 15yd compactor. The Wastequip 265XP “Precision Series” replaced the “SealPak” and they are great compactors. I included the dimensions for the 15yd too. For compaction ratios on garbage, these self-contained roll-off compactors have been getting from 3-to- 1 up to 4-to-1 compaction ratio depending on the make-up of the specific material. I’ve attached a sheet on the WasteQuip Accu-Pak compactor that is smaller. For garbage, these compactors would be right around 3-to-1 compaction ratio. Todd Todd Johnson Account Manager Blankenship Equipment 800.765.5811 Toll Free 253.288.8434 Fax 206.890.9791 Mobile EXHIBIT 4 DocuSign Envelope ID: 2828A270-EB33-49FD-8FCE-E9678358D84F toddj@blankenshipequipment.com www.blankenshipequipment.com http://blankenship.balers.bramidan.us Confidential Communication: This message and any attachments are the property of Blankenship Equipment Repair, Inc. It is intended only for the private and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain information that is non-public, proprietary, privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law and/or may be considered an intellectual properties or work product. If the reader of this message or its attachments is not the intended recipient and/or you have received this email in error, you must take no action based on the information in this email and you are hereby notified that any dissemination, misuse or copying or disclosure of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by phone or email and delete the original message and/or attachments. From: Frank Durocher [mailto:frank@rjdevelopment.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2018 2:17 PM To: Todd Johnson; 'Rogers, Hilsia' Subject: RE: Trash Compactor Guidelines for New Development Hello Todd and Hilsia, I have filed for a modification request with the city of Renton to allow us to move forward with a little less space than what their code requires. In order to do so, I needed to write out a “modification request” that outlines what the code says versus what we are asking for them to approve. To accompany my narrative, the city would like to have something in writing (or email) from one of you that states what the compacting ratio is. On the phone, I believe Hilsia told me that even the smaller ones compact 2:1. We have decided to design the enclosure around a 15yd 265x-WQ SealPak (see attached spec sheet that one of you provided to me for reference). Are we talking about a 2:1 compacting ratio for this? Maybe closer to 3:1? Frank Durocher Project Manager RJ Development 401 Central St SE Olympia, WA 98501 D ▪ (360) 810-8359 O ▪ (360) 528-3343 Email: frank@rjdevelopment.com “Seniors Housing Delivered” ™ DocuSign Envelope ID: 2828A270-EB33-49FD-8FCE-E9678358D84F From: Frank Durocher <frank@rjdevelopment.com> Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2018 1:18 PM To: Matthew Herrera Subject: FW: FW: Weatherly Inn Modifications Matt, here is a (very thorough!) response from the owner. I hope this helps! Please let me know if you need anything else, Frank Durocher Project Manager RJ Development 401 Central St SE Olympia, WA 98501 D ▪ (360) 810-8359 O ▪ (360) 528-3343 Email: frank@rjdevelopment.com “Seniors Housing Delivered” ™ From: Alex Bunn <alex@weatherlyinn.com> Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2018 12:45 PM To: Frank Durocher <frank@rjdevelopment.com> Cc: Karla Shaw <karla@weatherlyinn.com> Subject: Re: FW: Weatherly Inn Modifications Frank, The average age of our customers in our Tacoma mixed-use building is 85.74. Independent living average 84.24 years old, Assisted Living average 86.07, and Memory Care average 86.09. >5% are under 70 years old. 13% are between 70 and 80 years old. Three residents are over the age of 100. Aging in place is our mission, meaning people range from some levels of independence to total care. In 22 years experience, I only had one individual with a bike. It was a three-wheeler and she kept it in our enclosed courtyard. She never used it on the city street. Our local streets in Tacoma would be much more conducive for biking than the Talbot Road site. Renton has more hills nearby with fewer amenities and much more traffic. Our WAC's do not restrict our services by age or need. We do not want to restrict ourselves either. We usually have 0-1 employees who ride a bike to work. None presently. Let me know if you have any other questions. Sincerely, Alex On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 9:24 AM Frank Durocher <frank@rjdevelopment.com> wrote: EXHIBIT 5 DocuSign Envelope ID: 2828A270-EB33-49FD-8FCE-E9678358D84F Hey guys, Matt from the city is asking if the WI Renton will have a minimum age for the residents. It’s kind of a bogus request, if you ask me, because I don’t think a 65yo resident in Assisted Living is any more or less capable of riding a bicycle than an 85yo resident in Assisted Living. But I have to play the game sometimes! (I will address the trash compactor question separately) Frank Durocher Project Manager RJ Development 401 Central St SE Olympia, WA 98501 D ▪ (360) 810-8359 O ▪ (360) 528-3343 Email: frank@rjdevelopment.com “Seniors Housing Delivered” ™ From: Matthew Herrera <MHerrera@Rentonwa.gov> Sent: Monday, November 26, 2018 9:33 AM To: Frank Durocher <frank@rjdevelopment.com> Subject: Weatherly Inn Modifications Good Morning Frank, Hope you had a good Thanksgiving weekend. I will finally have an opportunity to look at your two modifications this week and I have a couple of questions. The first is regarding the refuse and recycling mod. Do you have an email or other correspondence with Republic that we can use as an exhibit that references their acceptance of the reduced area for the garbage compactor? The other is the age of the DocuSign Envelope ID: 2828A270-EB33-49FD-8FCE-E9678358D84F residents. Is there a minimum age for residents at Weatherly Inn? This would be used for justification of the reduced bicycle parking. Hope to get this out to you this week. Thanks! –Matt Matt Herrera, AICP - Senior Planner City of Renton Community & Economic Development 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98057-3232 425.430.6593 -- Alex Bunn President and CEO Weatherly Inn (360) 789-3046 DocuSign Envelope ID: 2828A270-EB33-49FD-8FCE-E9678358D84F